cp12-22-2015HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2015
CITY CENTER — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by city staff, committees and boards. Many
decisions regarding agenda items are based upon this information as well as: City policy and practices, inputfrom constituents,
and other questions or information that has not yet been presented or discussed regarding an agenda item)
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M.
(a) Approve the Council agenda and any agenda additions and/or corrections
2. INVOCATION — Congregational UCC
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. RECOGNITION OF GIFTS, DONATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE TO THE CITY
PUBLIC COMMENTS
(T is is an opportunity or members of the public to address the City Council on items not on the current agenda. Ifyou have a
question, concern or comment, please ask to be recognized by the mayor state your name and address for the record. Please
keep comments under 5 minutes. Individuals wishing to speakfor more than five minutes should ask to be included on the agenda
in advance of the meeting. All comments are appreciated, butplease refrain from personal or derogatory attacks on individuals)
5. CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(a) Truth in Taxation Hearing Minutes of December 3, 2015
(b) Regular Meeting of December 8, 2015
CONSENT AGENDA
(The items listedfor consideration will be enacted by one motion unless the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a city
staff member requests an item to be removed. Traditionally items are not discussed.)
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA I
(a) Consideration for Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to Build a Pole Type Building in a C-4
Zoning District Located at 1385 Hwy 7 West With Favorable Planning Commission
Recommendation (Adopt Resolution No. 1450 1)
(b) Consideration for Approval of a Vacation of a Portion of City Right -of -Way Near 470 High
Street at Hwy 7 East With Favorable Planning Commission Recommendation (Adopt Resolution
No. 14502)
(c) Resolution No. 14495 — Resolution Adopting 2016 Fee Schedule
(d) Resolution No. 14496 — Resolution Transferring Funds to 2015 Construction Fund and General
Fund
(e) Resolution No. 14499 — Resolution to Sell at Auction Surplus Property from the Compost
Facility
(f) Resolution No. 14450 — Resolution Supporting the Designation of a Portion of Trunk Highway 7
with McLeod County as the Michael Alan Hogan Memorial Highway
(g) Resolution No. 14503 - Resolution Establishing Location for Traffic Control Devices
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 22, 2015
(h) Consideration for Approval of 2016 License Renewals
(i) Appointments to Boards/Commissions
- Haley Jacobsen to Public Arts Commission to August 2016 (Filling Tinea Graham's
unexpired term)
- Kay Voigt and Grego Jodzio to Public Arts Commission to August 2018
- Ronald Kalenberg to Planning Commission to March 2021 (Filing Dave Johnston's term)
0) Consideration for Approval of Items for Water Tower (Golf Course Road) Reconditioning
Project — Letting No. 4, Project No. 16-04
- Resolution No. 14504 - Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report on Improvement
- Resolution No. 14505 - Resolution Receiving Report and Calling Hearing on Improvement
- Setting Public Hearing for January 12, 2016, at 6:00 p.m.
(k) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:00 P.M.) - NONE
COMMUNICATIONS REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
e purpose oJ this portion oJ the agenda is to provide the 77777 with information necessary to craft wise policy. Includes
items like monthly or annual reports and communications from other entities.)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. Approve/Deny Ordinance No. 15-748 - An Ordinance Approving the Codification of the Hutchinson
City Code (Second Reading and Adoption)
NEW BUSINESS
9. Approve/Deny Resolution No. 14498 — Resolution Adopting 2016 Compensation Plan and Position
Classification Table and Pay Grid
10. Approve/Deny Resolution Nos. 14485 — 14494 — Adopting 2016 City of Hutchinson Budgets and
Tax Levies
11. Approve/Deny Adoption of Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan
12. Approve/Deny City of Hutchinson Complete Streets Policy
13. Approve/Deny City Staff Involvement in the Development of the Dakota Rail Trail Master Plan
GOVERNANCE
(The purpose o t is portion of the agenda is to deal with organizational development issues, including policies,
performances, and other matters that manage the logistics of the organization. May include monitoring reports, policy
development and governance process items.)
14. MINUTES FROM COMMITTEES, BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS
(a) Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority Board Minutes from November 17, 2015
(b) City of Hutchinson Financial Report and Investment Report for November 2015
(c) Planning Commission Minutes from November 17, 2015
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 22, 2015
MISCELLANEOUS
15. STAFF UPDATES
16. COUNCIL/MAYOR UPDATE
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
DECEMBER 3, 2015
CALL TO ORDER — 6:00 P.M.
Members Present: Mayor Gary Forcier, Bill Arndt, Mary Christensen, Chad
Czmowski and John Lofdahl
Others present: Andy Reid, Finance Director and Matt Jaunich, City Administrator
2. TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Mayor Forcier opened the hearing at 6:00 p.m
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator, presented before the Council. Mr. Jaunich
explained the budget process the City has used to date. Five work sessions have been
held over the past eight months. The Council adopted the preliminary budget and tax
levy in September and last month truth in taxation notices were mailed to all City
property owners. Mr. Jaunich explained the purpose for tonight's hearing is to
enhance public participation in the property tax system by allowinu a public forum to
discuss the budget, discuss the proposed tax levy, explain the increases and hear
public comments and questions on the budget and tax levy. If the hearing needs to be
continued it will continued at the next Council meeting on December 8, 2015, and the
final budget and tax levy is expected to be adopted by the Council on December 22,
2015. Mr. Jaunich briefly explained market valuations and how they relate to a
property's tax. Mr. Jaunich also explained that the preliminary budget set in
September showed a tax increase of 2.4%. The revised budget now shows a 2% tax
levy increase. The City has adjusted its revenue projections and eliminated roughly
$48,500 in expenses since its preliminary budget was adopted.
Hutchinson's 2015 average City tax rate ranked the second lowest in McLeod
County, however is the second highest among other outstate regional centers.
Hutchinson is the lowest of all outstate regional centers for the poverty level, 4th
highest of all outstate regional centers for median household income, eighth highest
of all outstate regional centers for median home value and is the third lowest of all
outstate regional centers in LGA payments. These statistics are among 17 outstate
regional centers. Mr. Jaunich provided information on variables used in calculating
local government aid and provided a brief overview on property taxation and
homestead exclusion. Mr. Jaunich also provided an overview on the history of
market values. Mr. Jaunich provided various reasons as to why property taxes may
vary from year to year.
Mr. Jaunich then reviewed the City's mission statement and six core areas of focus.
Mr. Jaunich reviewed the proposed tax levies for 2016 which is a 2% increase for the
City's portion and a .1% increase for the EDA and HRA levies, for a total increase of
2.1%. The proposed 2016 tax levy will have the first increase in the general fund
portion of the levy since 2011. Compared to 2010, the City's total tax levy has
increased by 10%. The average annual tax levy increase since 2010 has been 1.6%.
The 2016 city tax levy accounts for a per capita tax of $481, up from $471 in 2015.
Mr. Jaunich reviewed the general fund revenues and expenses. Mr. Jaunich explained
that the general fund revenues do not include any "new" revenue outside of the 2.5%
tax levy increase and additional $37,500 in LGA for the proposed facility manager
position, property taxes account for 40% of the general fund revenues, ueneral fund
revenues include the restoration of the transfer from the WC, the City is expecting
most of the other revenue sources to remain relatively flat, there is no significant
change in transfer-ins from the enterprise funds, the 2016 budget does include a
$119,000 transfer from the City's self-insurance fund to help cover HSA contribution
costs and a 1% tax levy increase to the general fund is equivalent to $44,794. Mr.
Jaunich also explained that wages and benefits increased 1.5% in 2016 (these include
performance and other annual adjustments, two new positions — facility manager and
park maintenance equipment operator, costs for having the Rec Center open five days
a week, a 7% increase in health insurance premiums and not filling other positions in
finance and engineering), wages and benefits account for 66% of general fund
expenses, costs for services & charges increased by 6.5% (includes $45,000 for a job
compensation study, some city positions have not been filled and have been replaced
with contracted services, budget does include a reduction in recreation expenses due
to the pool closure), inflation, elections, etc. make up the additional increases and the
2016 budgeted expenses are balanced with revenues.
Mr. Jaunich explained that he received notification yesterday from the State of
Minnesota that they will not be granting the City's variance request this year to have
the DMV open 32 hours per week and will require the office to be open 40 hours per
week. The DMV office is in process of applying to be a passport agency, which will
help offset the costs of being open an additional day of the week.
Mr. Jaunich then reviewed the enterprise funds — consisting of the liquor, compost,
refuse, water, sewer and stormwater funds. All of these funds are cash flowing and
are healthy funds. Mr. Jaunich noted that the Liquor Hutch and Creekside continue to
do well and will contribute $585,000 to the general fund in 2016. Creekside is
assuming a reduced production model focusing on higher margin products. There
will be no increases in garbage, water and sewer rates. All enterprise funds are
expected to have a positive cash flow with healthy fund balances. There will be a
slight rate increase to stormwater rates of 8.3%. There will be no significant changes
in transfers to the general fund from the enterprise funds.
Mr. Jaunich reviewed the 2016 capital improvement plan budget. The CIP plan for
2016 is budgeted at $8,993,053. The largest portion of the entire CIP plan goes for
infrastructure. Park & Recreation and the enterprise funds get the majority of the
remaining budget. The funds for the capital improvement plan come from enterprise
funds, taxes, grants, debt, assessments and special funds/reserves. Some of the major
capital items for 2016 include the outdoor pool/aquatic center, water tower
reconditioning on Golf Course Road, street/infrastructure & facility improvements
and fire truck replacement.
Mr. Jaunich reviewed the debt management plan and the current projected debt levy.
The target debt levy is $2.2 million. Mr. Jaunich noted there are no significant
staffing cuts and/or changes in service. There are no new programs/services being
added. Staffing costs and capital needs are the biggest "driver" of the City's budget.
Fund balances continue to remain high and the fiscal condition of the City is healthy.
The State's budget forecasts continue to remain good ($1.87 billion surplus) and there
should be any fiscal restraints at the State that would impact the City's LGA. Home
values are increasing and the local economy appears to be improving from the
recession years. Mr. Jaunich provided information on workforce data, rental/housing
data, housing data, and building permit data. This data shows the unemployment rate
is down, vacancy rates for rental property is low, median sales price of homes is up,
home resales are up and home foreclosures are flat, construction valuation is up and
new home construction is slowly increasing from 2011.
Jim Bobier, 20926 Skyview Avenue, presented before the Council. Mr. Bobier spoke
of concerns about HTI being bought out by TDK and what the impact may be to the
City if that company is no longer part of the community. Mr. Bobier urged the
Council to do scenario planning should HTI/TDK no longer be in operation and
contributing to the tax base.
Mr. Bobier asked if there were claimed benefits from art and bicycle trails. Lofdahl
noted the only statistic that he is aware of is that an average bicyclist that rides in to
town spends an average of $100. Mr. Bobier suggested the Council survey new
residents on the top three reasons that they moved to Hutchinson, as well as surveying
those residents who move from the city. Mr. Bobier also commented that with the
various enterprise funds, the City should have the lowest tax rate. Mr. Bobier also
commented that he learned the City of Litchfield will be building a new aquatic
center. Mr. Bobier asked if any businesses have expanded since the construction of
the trail. He also asked if there is any data of the number of users of the trail. The
Council noted that the paved trail has only been opened for a short time so there is no
strong data to show the number of users.
Motion by Czmowski, second by Christensen, to close public hearing at 7:20 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
I_��lili►1
Following the public hearing, the meeting was adjourned.
ATTEST:
Steven W. Cook Marc A. Se ora
Mayor Interim City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2015
CITY CENTER — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
(The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in advance by city staff, committees and boards. Many
decisions regarding agenda items are based upon this information as well as: City policy and practices, inputfrom constituents,
and other questions or information that has not yet been presented or discussed regarding an agenda item)
1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER— 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Gary Forcier called the meeting to order. Members present were Mary Christensen, Chad
Czmowski, Bill Arndt and John Lofdahl. Others present were Matt Jaunich, City Administrator, Marc
Sebora, City Attorney and Kent Exner, City Engineer
(a) Approve the Council agenda and any agenda additions and/or corrections
Motion by Lofdahl, second by Czmowski, to approve the agenda as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
2. INVOCATION — Congregational UCC
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. RECOGNITION OF GIFTS, DONATIONS AND COMMUNITY SERVICE TO THE CITY
PUBLIC COMMENTS
(]his is an opportunity or members of the public to address the City Council on items not on the current agenda. Ifyou have a
question, concern or comment, please ask to be recognized by the mayor state your name and address for the record. Please
keep comments under 5 minutes. Individuals wishing to speakfor more than five minutes should ask to be included on the agenda
in advance ofthe meeting. All comments are appreciated, butplease refrain from personal or derogatory attacks on individuals.)
5. CITIZENS ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL
6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
(a) Regular Meeting of November 24, 2015
(b) Workshop of November 24, 2015
Motion by Christensen, second by Lofdahl, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried
unanimously.
CONSENT AGENDA
(The items listedfor consideration will be enacted by one motion unless the Mayor, a member of the City Council or a city
staff member requests an item to be removed. Traditionally items are not discussed.)
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA I
(a) Resolution No. 14484 - Resolution In Support of Increasing Local Government Aid in the 2016
Legislative Session
(b) Consideration of Change Order No. 4 —Letting No. 3, Project No. 15-03
(c) Consideration of Board Appointments
- Steve Hahn to Airport Commission to September 2017 (Filling Joel Schwarze's Unexpired
Term
- Don Schroeder and Kay Yoch to Senior Advisory Board to January 2019
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 2015
(d) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register A
Items 7(a) and 7(d) were pulled for separate discussion
Item 7(a) had further discussion. Lofdahl noted increased funding from the state of Minnesota to
all cities based on a complex formula that could reduce local property taxes
Item 7(d) had further discussion. Lofdahl noted large payments on this months' register which
would tie into the Local Government Aid (LGA) support and encouraged residents to contact
legislature.
Motion by Lofdahl, second by Czmowski to approve consent agenda I. Motion carried
unanimously.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA II
(a) Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments — Register B
Motion by Arndt, second by Christensen, to approve the consent agenda II. Motion carried
unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (6:00 P.M.)
9. Approve/Deny Ordinance No. 15-748 - An Ordinance Approving the Codification of the Hutchinson
City Code (First Reading, Second Reading and Adoption set for December 22, 2015)
City Attorney, Marc Sebora presented before the Council. Sebora explained the purpose for this
ordinance is to update our code book of ordinances; to make it consistent and readable. This process is
done with a contracted company. Regulatory changes, liquor, licensing and zoning ordinances need to
be incorporated in the ordinance book. Anything the Council has passed through an ordinance is
included in this book. Statutes now need to be added to our ordinances and will be through this process.
Motion by Arndt, second by Christensen to close the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously
Motion by Lofdahl, second by Christensen to approve the First Reading and set the Second Reading for
December 22, 2015. Motion carried unanimously.
purpose of this portion of the agenda is to provide the Council with information necessary to craft wise policy. Includes
like monthly or annual reports and communications from other entities.)
10. Discussion of Seeking Grants for the Historic Interpretive Signage and "Founders' Park" Idea —
Steve Cook
Former Mayor Steve Cook presented before the Council. Hutchinson celebrated its 160th
Anniversary in November and Cook feels there are a lot of stories to tell about Hutchinson. Cook is
asking for the Council's blessing to work with City staff and other organizations to work on grant
applications for signage at different sites in Hutchinson. The signage would give the interpretive
information at these historical sites. Cook is looking to work with the Park and Rec Department,
Public Arts Commission, Historical Society, Historic Hutchinson, Hutchinson Center for the Arts
and Chamber of Commerce.
11. Review of Truth in Taxation Hearing
City Administrator Matt Jaunich presented before the Council. Jaunich explained that the variance
for part time hours of operation in the Motor Vehicle Department was not approved for 2016. In the
past it was granted due to economic hardship with the layoffs at HTI. The Department of Motor
Vehicle will be open five days a week with the possibility of being open into the evening one of
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 2015
those days. Jaunich also explained the possibility of becoming a Passport Acceptance Agency on
limited days which could bring in revenue to offset some of the costs of being open more hours.
Council members suggested Monday nights as the evening to be open. Steve Cook suggested
keeping the existing Thursdays as the evening to be open as this is what the residents are used to.
12. Review of City Snow and Ice Removal Service
John Olson, Public Works Supervisor, presented before the Council. Olson presented Snow
Removal Operations and Snow and Ice Policy. Olson emphasized on overnight parking in the
downtown area. There are 11 municipal parking lots and 7 of the 11 have designated overnight
parking stalls with new signage. When these areas need to be cleaned, a temporary sign is placed
over the permanent signaue and will be cleaned sometime between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Olson
recommended to those using the designated parking, to get a parking permit from the police
department or City Center free of charge.
In regards to mailboxes and snow removal, Olson stated effort will be made to work with the post
office on location of the mailboxes. The City does have a policy in place to replace a damaged
mailbox up to $250.00. Exner thanked Olson, streets department, parks department, Creekside,
water/wastewater departments and engineering staff on their efforts of snow removal and high level
of service. Olson noted the pride he takes in team effort; nobody is done until everyone is done.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13. Follow Up Regarding the City of Hutchinson Acting as Fiscal Host for Elks Inclusive Play Park
City Administrator Matt Jaunich presented before the council. Regarding improvements to Elks
Park and the City acting as a "fiscal host" for the project, the City is authorized by State law to
accept donations for public purposes by either individuals or entities. The difficulty arises in using
those funds for the completion of a project. Once the money has been deposited with the City it in
effect becomes "city money" and the City must abide by the rules and laws involving proper public
expenditures.
Tammy Lehn, representative from the Elks, presented before the Council. Lehn asked the Council
to table this topic to allow her to look at other options. She contacted McLeod County United Way
and is waiting for a response. Lehn will contact Jaunich when she has more information.
NEW BUSINESS
14. Approve/Deny Fire Relief Association Contribution Policy
City Administrator Matt Jaunich presented before the council. Jaunich explained the purpose is to
have a policy in place that states a purpose for the City's contribution ($2,500 per active firefighter)
to the Hutchinson Fire Relief Association and sets an annual amount that will assist the City with
budgeting. It also increases the monthly benefit amount from $15 a month per year of service to
$17 a month per year of service. This would be the first increase since 2008. This will be paid by
the Hutchinson Fire Relief Association monies.
Jim Brodd, Fire Relief Association Board Member and retired firefighter, and Brandon Vik,
President of the Fire Relief Association and firefighter informed the Council there are 57
firefighters drawing pension. Currently the Hutchinson Fire Department has 28 active firefighters
and three rookie firefighters.
Motion by Christensen, second by Czmowski to approve Fire Relief Association Contribution
Policy. Motion carried unanimously.
15. Approve/Deny Participating in the Voluntary Assessment for the CGMC Wastewater Legal and
Regulatory Program
City Engineer Kent Exner presented before Council. Exner explained the Coalition of Greater
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 2015
Minnesota Cities (CGMC) is requesting the consideration of its members to contribute, via
voluntary assessment, for the support of a CGMC Wastewater Legal and Regulatory Program. The
amount would be $1.00 for each wastewater hookup. Exner explained expensive and generally
unfunded mandates are being enforced to city water/wastewater facilities and this could be
problematic for communities
Motion by Lofdahl, second by Czmowski, to approve participating in the Voluntary Assessment for
the CGMC Wastewater Legal and Regulatory Program. Motion carried unanimously.
GOVERNANCE
(T e purpose o t is portion of the agenda is to deal with organizational development issues, including policies,
performances, and other matters that manage the logistics of the organization. May include monitoring reports, policy
development and governance process items.)
16. MINUTES FROM COMMITTEES, BOARDS OR COMMISSIONS
(a) Resource Allocation Committee Minutes from December 1, 2015
(b) 2016 Residential Leaf Vacuum Service Report
MISCELLANEOUS
17. STAFF UPDATES
Kent Exner —City Engineer Exner thanked staff and Council for their work on the solar project. Mr.
Exner also informed the Council that MNDOT had a bike and pedestrian workshop last week and it
went well. Exner walked around with the pedestrian consultant expert and they were very
complimentary of the City's downtown. Exner also informed the Council of the 2016 Infrastructure
Improvement Program and identified the streets that are currently proposed to be addressed within the
2016 Pavement Management Program.
Mr. Exner also talked about upgrading the sidewalk on the north side of South Grade Road and
upgrading it to a trail from Dale Street to Hwy 15. This would make a current five-foot sidewalk a ten
foot trail. Exner said he would look into Safe Routes to School grants.
Marc Sebora — City Attorney Sebora announced the Charter Commission met and approved the Charter
revisions by way of ordinance. This will be on the agenda the first meeting in January.
18. COUNCIL/MAYOR UPDATE
Bill Arndt — Council Member Arndt asked what the reason was for cuttinu down the cedar trees on
Hwy 15. Olson explained it was for visibility reasons and the trees were initially planted in clumps of
three and were touching and became unhealthy. The healthy cedar trees were saved.
John Lofdahl — Council Member Lofdahl informed everyone that Council Members Mary Christensen,
Bill Arndt, and former Mayor Steve Cook went to the State Capitol Preservation Workshop.
Mary Christensen — Council Member Christensen had some citizens ask who is responsible for the
lights on top of buildings downtown; some are on and some are off. Through discussion it was learned
that the prod ect has switched hands a few times and Sebora informed everyone some property owners
do not want lights on their building. Christensen also reminded everyone of the downtown activities on
Saturday, December 12th and encouraged everyone to attend. Activities include clip clop trolley, Santa
at the Historic Church, Farmers Market sales at the Depot, Center for the Arts has ornament making,
and all the downtown shops will be open.
Gary Forcier — Mayor Forcier encouraged everyone to be safe in their travels.
.19
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 8, 2 01 S
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Arndt, second by Lofdahl, to adjourn at 7:23 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL c'=y-fAa�
Request for Board Action 7AL =-ft
Agenda Item: Consideration of C.U.P. to Build a Pole Building at 1385 HWY 7 W.
Department: Planning
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Dan Jochum
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Dan Jochum
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Excelsior Homes is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a pole building at 1385 Highway 7 West. Section
154.123, of the Zoning Ordinance requires a conditional use permit for buildings of pole type construction.
Nobody from the public spoke regarding this request. A representative from Excelsior Homes spoke briefly regarding
the plan for the pole building.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved the request.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Conditional Use Permit.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
DIRECTORS REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT r
To:
From:
Date:
Application
Applicant
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Dan Jochum, AICP
December 10, 2015, for December 15, 2015, Planning Commission Meeting
Consideration of a request for a Conditional Use Permit to a Pole Building at 1385
Highway 7 West.
Jeff Munsell/Excelsior Homes
CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT
Excelsior Homes is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a pole building at 1385
Highway 7 West. Section 154.123, of the Zoning Ordinance requires a conditional use permit
for buildings of pole type construction.
Existing Zoning:
Property Location:
Lot Size:
GENERAL INFORMATION
C-4 Fringe Commercial
1385 Highway 7 West
1.76 Acres
Existing Land Use: Commercial
Conditional Use Permit
Excelsior Homes —1385 Highway 7 West
Planning Commission —12/15/15
Page 2
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Zoning History:
Applicable
Regulations:
Building:
Analysis:
C-4 to East R-2 to West and North
Commercial
Commercial
Section 154.123
The proposed building is 2,000 sq. ft.
The purpose of the building is to store vehicles and equipment. The building is proposed to be
located on the northern portion of 1385 Highway 7 West. It will be located approximately 57
feet from the residential zoning area to the north. There are already some large evergreen trees
that will provide screening from the adjacent residential properties. Staff proposes adding three
more evergreen type trees at least 6 feet tall to fill in the gaps between the existing evergreen
trees to the north to provide more screening for the building. (See aerial photo attached).
Conditional Use Permit:
The Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is required for pole type building construction.
The following are standards for granting a conditional use permit:
(a) The proposed building or use at the particular location requested is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public
convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or
community;
(b) The proposed building or use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon
adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility
facilities and other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare; and
(c) The proposed building or use will be designed, arranged and operated so as to permit
the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable
district regulations.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following recommendations:
The standards for granting a conditional use permit would be met, subject to the
conditions stated.
Conditional Use Permit
Excelsior Homes —1385 Highway 7 West
Planning Commission —12/15/15
Page 3
2. The proposed building and site improvements shall comply with the standards of the
C-4 district and the Zoning Ordinance, as well as all other City regulations.
3. The use must meet all applicable building and fire code regulations.
4. The conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions required by
the permit are observed. Any expansion or intensification of a conditional use
requires approval of a new conditional use permit.
5. If the proposed use fails to start operation within one year of the conditional use
permit being granted, the conditional use permit shall be deemed null and void and a
new conditional use permit must be applied for.
6. The Applicant must obtain all necessary permits for any construction that would be
needed.
r
r
M
.Akr_
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
FOR EXCELSIOR HOMES
OEEO PESE OTT FIX PMJ:M A
Tfpr pw m la+ 4. l.nNn 3j, 7pamn0 I I7 I Pm" 30 wall .1 an. 9+4 MKPW Pft S
4-00 m +eevar.
(yernhK M E.ylnaeal grnAr .1 ape Gawmwm Lar L' V,Anea rMnxlr• ebnp m. B -
wef vl aWp� 41 +rvaaa+ Lvl .. o dnNaaa .1 3.'10.00 i.er. nrrc. nxlheHr• PxpI1N mn IN Ea+
kw m aW6 GPwaawM Lvlo!: el A10.00 f4.r w m. Pews el "owl" m IM bap n be
APuiwc Ph— Kpnl.�yPp nslnx1" ptraMi .a+h fa6 Em+ W.. IM wrarxe— P h Rw 9
INE m Na amen li0.o0 Nn al a OeaHaaxx w1 k: IMnpa 17..+xty. eWnP ma Ine wW Seax
Inf. a Mnrx,e. m = MK M.. 9eNM.gr. pw9aa Neh yb E.ar law. N a port "w h.r
ryenn M IM lwpl l- el "d O --m lm l a. m "'"' pm~ -M Imp E.n i": +M .
(na+wb, Vx l NIn aaW aw+n N. el Oewnnanr Le+ 4. fe IM Pw,r el OrpNnq
OMD OElOPpRpF FOP PAKM 6
lnm pvi H Oewmwn+ Lar s, S.CPre ]0, T.amhq I17 lffa+n, Mp W ahaal. d—, oa
hMPC
aolpA.el� Wcoenwp H W tn Ll e:I+h.nM k Ph 4 Mr ilkne.4— 3W MY. Awner wu+A {iG il 91 1rK
nM: Hwne..Pal E00 fen +e Ina 9ehl ee Gwpxnp.
OFID GEHCPI OW FOP PAACEL e
lope pen m u.narPnlarr ler a, 9.Pebn 3% T—t" 117 1lxln, >kaga 30 vn.l. 4sw*w W
rWWkc
bpKwp m a P.Itt en Hw wish 1wf M:W Y ,w p Lar 4 e ill , ..1 WO }.m —1 al n.
a0awwfl exon' el .W OeaxxMw MI .: -MP— Ibre00 ra.e: "NI -?70 Nac PI K
aPaaA 4]0 W, rMne. — 100 eefl w Te "P H PePnAPq.
f
nuI aw.r rn ePPr kleMee Ina e.nrke m enr Iw.
carp. Mt4bM pawMeN. aneekbel x
ex�ar ioaP mab�+vlms°euir.'mn% liY0f1i+
easrpwnl mexnri I elna epwm
Joo�
0�� N
�L
baa t3
E�
PAflCF1 c I�
3�
` STATE HIGHWAY NO. 7 8 NO. 22
2
I❑ i SUNSET 8
r r+PksE
Z
4
RIpGE
wnre.paee n.�ww.a„a
3 I z
.�"`w fh x! rf ti Pae .., w 4ww•we
PA qM A
F.wi+alMrn
-elrwr
� ---
wnao
-�..•.
Joo�
0�� N
�L
baa t3
E�
PAflCF1 c I�
3�
` STATE HIGHWAY NO. 7 8 NO. 22
I
3 I z
I
I
I
r E
1�
Iit
I
tlf
0
...
F
I
�~~~
wew,e.NeEwe
I
i
_ _ ------
----_—
aw,w,P
E=AST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
1V
----------------- -------------------�----------------
9'-' I-, g- °——s'-o�— ----a--o- e4r d- 9,-o•
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
E I I
I � I
E I
i I !
I I i
L-------- ----------------------------- - - - - - - -
-
I ! I I I
I I I I I
i I I I
i I {
------------� I
! ! I
' I
I o
I
I o
E
' I
i
I
I
WEST ELEVATION
I
---------------------------------�
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MCLEOD COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 14501
RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND REASONS FOR APPROVAL OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A POLE TYPE BUILDING IN A C-4 ZONING
DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1385 HWY 7 W, JEFF MUNSELL, APPLICANT.
FACTS
1. Mr. Jeff Munsell is the owner of a parcel of land located at 1385 HWY 7 W, Hutchinson Minnesota;
and,
2. The subject property is legally described as: Section 35-117-30 — S'/z - Half Section
3. Mr. Jeff Munsell has applied to the City for a conditional use permit to construct a pole type building,
located at 1385 HWY 7 W, Hutchinson MN.
4. The Planning Commission met on December 15, 2015, and held a public hearing on the request and
considered the effects of the proposal on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the
surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in
the surrounding area and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and hereby recommends approval
of the request subject to the following findings and conditions:
The standards for granting a conditional use permit would be met, subject to the
conditions stated.
b. The proposed building and site improvements shall comply with the standards of the C-4
district and the Zoning Ordinance, as well as all other City regulations.
C. The use must meet all applicable building and fire code regulations.
d. The conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions required by the
permit are observed. Any expansion or intensification of a conditional use requires
approval of a new conditional use permit.
e. If the proposed use fails to start operation within one year of the conditional use permit
being granted, the conditional use permit shall be deemed null and void and a new
conditional use permit must be applied for.
f The Applicant must obtain all necessary permits for any construction that would be
needed.
5. The City Council of the City of Hutchinson reviewed the requested conditional use permit at its
meeting on December 22, 2015, and has considered the recommendation and findings of the Planning
Commission and hereby does recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the
following findings and conditions:
a. The standards for granting a conditional use permit would be met, subject to the
conditions stated.
b. The proposed building and site improvements shall comply with the standards of the C-4
district and the Zoning Ordinance, as well as all other City regulations.
C. The use must meet all applicable building and fire code regulations.
Findings of Fact — Resolution # 14501
1385 HWY 7 W Conditional Use Permit
Page 2
d. The conditional use permit shall remain in effect as long as the conditions required by the
permit are observed. Any expansion or intensification of a conditional use requires
approval of a new conditional use permit.
e. If the proposed use fails to start operation within one year of the conditional use permit
being granted, the conditional use permit shall be deemed null and void and a new
conditional use permit must be applied for.
f The Applicant must obtain all necessary permits for any construction that would be
needed.
APPLICABLE LAW
6. The conditional use permit request meets the following standards as required in Section 154.123 of
the City of Hutchinson Municipal Code:
(a) The proposed building or use at the particular location requested is necessary or desirable to
provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and will
contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community;
(b) The proposed building or use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent
property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facilities and other matters
affecting the public health, safety and general welfare; and
(c) The proposed building or use will be designed, arranged and operated so as to permit the
development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district
regulations.
CONCLUSIONS OF THE LAW
7. The requested conditional use permit is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
8. The proposed use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property,
character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facilities and other matters affecting the
public health, safety and general welfare.
9. The proposed use will be designed, arranged and operated so as to permit the development and use of
neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations
10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, that the application to issue a conditional use permit allowing the construction of a pole
type building, located at 1385 HWY 7 W, Hutchinson MN is hereby approved with the stated
conditions.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 2015.
ATTEST:
Matt Jaunich
City Administrator
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci vof 0, a_ �
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Consideration of a Vacation of a Portion of City ROW near 470 High St NE
Department: Planning
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Dan Jochum
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Dan Jochum
Reviewed by Staff F1
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes):
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
The City of Hutchinson is requesting to vacate a portion of City right-of-way near 470 High St.NE and Highway 7 East
because the City does not need the property for right-of-way purposes. The City is then planning on selling the
property to the abutting property owner. The property owner at 470 High St. has always maintained this portion of
property and it is essentially a part of their lot.
Nobody from the Public spoke regarding this request.
The Planning Commission unanimously approved this request.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of resolution 14502 vacating the Right-of-way.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
DIRECTORS REPORT - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
To:
From:
Date:
Application
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Dan Jochum, AICP
December 10, 2015, for December 15, 2015, Planning Commission Meeting
Consideration of a request for a vacation of a portion of City right-of-way
near 470 High St. NE at Highway 7 East.
Applicant: City of Hutchinson
VACATION OF EASEMENTS
Brief Description:
Vacated Portion
HIGHWAY 7 E
The City of Hutchinson is requesting to vacate a portion of City right-of-way near 470 High
St.NE and Highway 7 East because the City does not need the property for right-of-way purposes.
The City is then planning on selling the property to the abutting property owner. The property
owner at 470 High St. has always maintained this portion of property and it is essentially a part of
their lot.
Existing Zoning:
GENERAL INFORMATION
C-4 Fringe Commercial
Property Location: 470 High St. NE
Vacation of Right -of -Way
470 High St. NE and Highway 7 East
Planning Commission -December 15, 2015
Page 2
Lot Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Land Use
and Zoning:
Comprehensive Land
Use Plan:
Zoning History:
Applicable
Regulations:
Analysis and
Recommendation:
Approximately .088 acres
Right -of -Way (undeveloped)
C-4 Fringe Commercial
Commercial
N/A
Section 14.05 Vacation of Streets - City Charter
Staff recomments approval of the vacation of right-of-way.
` •� /NORTH HALF /, B16 _",,, STREET VACATION EXHIBIT FOR
e10 -�� - f THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
7 Northerly right of way B74 Northam; right of way
°"
y fl ,�,gRTM+ENT OF TRA NSPORTA TION r r
MI&AESO TA
dine Highray 7 2 _� —
r.r • / Y t R/W x u1q`�RO�N^•� �_ -- T
r 4J-4 7
z IR GHT OF WA Y P
TRUNK
HIGHWAY 7, & 22 1j
• r
r scale in feet
pr0rt '03" • - sa'tha r r�ig�t M woy_J 71
a
Ea
B2 _R.Ltt .7856'-- B19 PROPOSVACATION QE9CRIP110N
Svuth2r1Ltght of way— �- 0,94 P► Ir Vecote that port of Fifth Avenue Northeast, formerly Second Street, lying northeasterly
512'"h
et H earmr bf „ h PYroM deeded to I of aria odidnin the northeoete Nae o} Lok 1. hack 75, NORTH WLL.F OF
Lot 1 1S ry
CRY or HutohTnaori li �N 9 rtY
H 1/2 NUfCtilk30H/ [Qac Hv, 4162.94] HLIiCHII�IS ,according to the recorded plot thereof, described oe follows:
�Ir f Commencing at the most easterly tamer of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly, along the
/ Part al former Highway right of way as arraJ�n + northeasterly line of said Let 1 a distenes of 8.61 Feet to the pOZ of be inning of
( R on UNJP4MWA DEPARTMENT OF TRAHSPpRp1,T said FITth Arenua Northeast being vacated; thence North 03 degraee 7 7 minutes 31
y aeconds West, assuming the southeasterly line of said Lot 1 has a bearing of North 38
on "b¢ �j� R�FR OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-i7 rMnee��to the Ir degrees 47 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 56.07 feet the centerline of said
Cky of by Rsloove No, 1428, Canevl,Cectivne I Fifth Avenue Northeast; thence northwesterly, along void centerline of Fifth Avenue
4302 & 4308, dated 04/01/2010y I! Northeast 51.76 feet to the intersection with a line parallel with and distant 75.00 feet
southerly of the conterlins of Trunk Highway No. 7 and 22 as shown on MINNESOTA
rJ C j a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PIAT NO. 43-47, according to the
JVL recorded plat thereof (sold centerline of Trunk Highwa No. 7 and 22 being shown as
the aequlaltion Ilne thereon); thence westerly, along said parolkA line, 59.76 feet to the
A_�y z intsreection with the northeasterly proiongotion of the northwesterly Ilne of sold Lot 1;
"rc� ti O ••� +Ir w thence southwesterly, olong acid northeasterly prolongation to the moat northerly
/qiP �� Moot EH comer F Domer of void Lot 1; thence southeosteriy, along the northeasterly line of said lot 1 to
/ ^ • N f�2 HUok TCH N ,,� the paint of beginning.
j re'e000`0/ The City of Hutchinson reserves an easement for utility purposes over, under and across
/ 4v,
`•� S that part of riTth Avenue NE being here vacated.
OF HUTCHINSON d I hrrsby cerilTy that Thls Surrey. Plan or
Report was pr spur sd by ms or under my direct
supsrrie fan and that 1 am a duly liter,, sd
PISi,LUM I.AirID SURVEYING, INC •` Minneeotaaysr under rh■ laws of Tae state of
P0Box33 �� /�
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 �w
Phone (ata] 1187-47891 Oafs:.�ri/7 s�✓S L c, No. �' Sf3�g
Pon [3203 587-3752 / `r �•`
JOB NO I&A" BK P-397 Pg 5 / U
RESOLUTION NO. 14502
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF CITY RIGHT OF WAY
NEAR 470 HIGH ST NE AT HWY 7 E, HUTCHINSON.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
I 1►1��'SI
1. The City of Hutchinson., property owner, petitioned for the vacation of dedicated City rights of way near
470 High ST NE AT HWY 7 E. The areas are legally described as:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATED RIGHT -OF - WAY:
Vacate that part of Fifth Avenue Northeast, formerly Second Street, lying northeasterly of and adjoining
the northeasterly line of Lot 1, Block 15, NORTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON, according to the recorded
plat thereof, described as follows:
Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly, along the northeasterly line
of said Lot 1 a distance of 8.61 feet to the point beginning of said Fifth Avenue Northeast being vacated;
thence North 03 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds West, assuming the southeasterly line of said Lot 1 has a
bearing of North 38 degrees 47 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 56.07 feet the centerline of said
Fifth Avenue Northeast; thence northwesterly, along said centerline of Fifth Avenue Northeast 51.70 feet
to the intersection with a line parallel with and distant 75.00 feet southerly of the centerline of Trunk
Highway No. 7 and 22 as shown on MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT
OF WAY PLAT NO. 43-47, accordinu to the recorded plat thereof (said centerline of Truck Hiuhway
No. 7 and 22 being shown as the acquisition line thereon); thence westerly, alone said parallel line, 59.76
feet to the intersection with the northeasterly prolongation of the northwesterly line of said Lot 1; thence
southwesterly, along said northeasterly prolongation to the most northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence
southeasterly, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning.
The City of Hutchinson reserves an easement for utility purposes over, under and across that part of Fifth
Avenue NE being here vacated.
2. The City Council has the Planning Commission recommendation for approval and has found that the
public interest will still be served by disposing of Right -Of -Way that is not needed and will benefit the
adjoining landowner.
3. The City Council has determined that this vacation is in keeping with the general planning of the City.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council hereby approves the vacation of Right -of -Way as described above.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
ATTEST:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action
79 M-W
Agenda Item: Resolution 14495 Adopting the 2016 Fee Schedule
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Attached is the 2016 Fee Schedule for City operations with all changes shown in red font.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution 14495 Adopting the 2016 Fee Schedule
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14495
ADOPTING 2016 FEE SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is empowered by previously passed ordinances to
impose fees for services, and
WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of costs for providing the services for
various city departments
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THAT THE FOLLOWING FEE SCHEDULES ARE ADOPTED AND
THAT THESE FEE SCHEDULES REPLACE ANY FEE SCHEDULES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL.
2016 Building Permit Fee Schedule
2016 Compost/Transfer Facility Fee Schedule
2016 Event Center Fee Schedule
2016 Evergreen Reservation Fee Schedule
2016 Finance Department Fee Schedule
2016 Fire Department Fee Schedule
2016 HRA Fee Schedule
2016 Legal Department Fee Schedule
2016 Licenses and Permits Fee Schedule
2016 Liquor License Fee Schedule
2016 Mapping and Printing Service Fee Schedule
2016 Parks, Recreation, and Community Education Fee Schedule
2016 Planning and Land Use Fee Schedule
2016 Police Department Fee Schedule
2016 Public Works Fee Schedule
* Fee Schedules attached
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
2016 FEE SCHEDULE
DRAFT - 12/22/2015 Council Meeting
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Schedule includes the following (in alphabetical order)
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 2 of 21 12/14/2015
Page
- Building/Plumbing/Mechanical permits
3
- Creekside
5
- Event Center
5
- Evergreen Senior Dining
6
- Finance
7
- Fire Department
7
- HRA
7
- Legal
8
- Licenses (general and liquor)
8
- Mapping/Printing
9
- Parks, Recreation, Community Education
10
- Plan Reviews
13
- Planning/Land Use
13
- Police Department
14
- Public Works: Engineering
16
Water
17
Sewer
18
Stormwater
19
Garbage
19
Cemetery
20
HATS Facility
21
Airport
21
Operations & Maintenance
21
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 2 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2015 Fees
%
Last
Chane
Change
Building/Plumbing/Mechanical Permits
Fixed Fees:
1 & 2 Family Residential Reroofing
$50.00
plus surcharge fee
$50.00
0.0%
2011
1 & 2 Family Residential Residing
$50.00
plus surcharge fee
$50.00
0.0%
2011
1 & 2 Family Residential Window/Door
$50.00
plus surcharge fee
$50.00
0.0%
2011
Replacement
Manufactured (Mobile) Home Install
$185.00
plus surcharge fee. Separate mechanical & plumbing permit
$185.00
0.0%
2011
required.
Utility Sheds
$50.00
under 200 sq. ft - surcharge does not apply.
$50.00
0.0%
2011
$21.29 /sq.ft.
Sheds over 200 sq. ft. valuation of $21.29 / sq. ft.
$20.88 /sq.ft.
2.0%
Moving Permit
$175.00
plus surcharge fee, includes excavation permit fee,
$175.00
0.0%
2011
if applicable
Demolition Permit
$50.00
Residential remodels & accessory structures
$50.00
0.0%
2015
$125.00
Residential demolition
$125.00
$250.00
lCommercial demolition
$250.00
Residential Square Foot Valuation:
Dwellings
$100.26 /sq.ft.
Rate x Sq. Ft. to arrive at the
$98.16 /sq.ft.
2.1%
2015
Basements
Finished
$10.00 /sq.ft.
Construction Valuation which is
$10.00 /sq.ft.
0.0°k
2011
used to calculate the actual fee
Semi -Finished
$10.00 /sq.ft.
(see fee rates under Construction Valuation)
$10.00 /sq.ft.
0.0%
2011
Unfinished
$20.00 /sq.ft.
Example: 100 sq. ft. 3 -Season Porch
$20.00 /sq.ft.
0.0%
2011
Porches
3 Season Porch
$70.18 /sq.ft.
Construction Valuation = $70.18 x 100 sq. ft
$69.16 /sq.ft.
1.5%
2015
4 Season Porch
$100.26 /sq.ft.
Construction Valuation = $7,018
$98.16 /sq.ft.
2.1%
2015
Screened Porch
$40.10 /sq.ft.
Fee ($2,001 - $25,000 valuation range)
$39.26 /sq.ft.
2.1%
2015
Garages
Attached
$38.56 /sq.ft.
1 st $2,000 of value: $76.35
$37.81 /sq.ft.
2.0%
2015
Detached
$21.29 /sq.ft.
Remaining value $5,018/1000 x $14.70 $73.76
Total Fee $150.11
$20.88 /sq.ft.
2.0%
2015
Gazebo
$19.00 /sq.ft.
$19.00 /sq.ft.
0.0%
2011
Deck
$10.00 /sq.ft.
$10.00 /sq.ft.
0.0%
2015
Construction Valuation:
$1 -$1,200
$49.88
minimum valuation and permit amount
$49.88
0.0%
2011
$1,201 - $2,000
$53.03
for the first $1,200 plus $3.20 for each additional $100
$53.03
0.0%
2011
or fraction thereof to and including $2,000
$2,001 - $25,000
$76.35
for the first $2,000 plus $14.70 for each additional $1,000
$76.35
0.0%
2011
or fraction thereof to and including $25,000
$25,001 - $50,000
$431.35
for the first $25,000 plus $10.61 for each additional $1,000
$431.35
0.0%
2011
or fraction thereof to and including $50,000
$50,001 - $100,000
$709.74
for the first $50,000 plus $7.35 for each additional $1,000
$709.74
0.0%
2011
or fraction thereof to and including $100,000
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 3 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
$100,001 - $500,000
$1,095.61
for the first $100,000 plus $5.88 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof to and including $500,000
$1,095.61
0.0%
2011
$500,001 - $1,000,000
$3,565.21
for the first $500,000 plus $5.00 for each additional $1,000
or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000
$3,565.21
0.0%
2011
$1,000,001 and Up
$6,183.65
for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.31 for each additional
$1,000 or fraction thereof.
$6,183.65
0.0%
2011
Penalty Fee
Double the Permit Fee - per City Administrator's
memo of 5-17-88
Refund Policy
Refunds may be available at the discretion of the
Building Official.
Plumbing Permit Fees:
Fixture of Item Fee 1$12.00 $12 per roughed -in fixture or item. Minimum of $50.00 1$12.00 1 0.0% 2011
Mechanical Permit Fees:
Gas Conversion Connection (switch) $125.00 plus surcharge fee $125.00 0.0% 2011
Gas Appliance Replacement $50.00 plus surcharge fee $50.00 0.0% 2011
Mechanical Fee 1.25% Valuation X 1.25% - plus State surcharge. 1.25% 0.0% 2011
Minimum of $50.00 plus State surcharge.
Miscellaneous Fees:
Rental registration/inspection
$20.00 /unit
Initial inspection and 1 follow up inspection, if needed.
$10.00 /unit
100.0%
2010
Rental Unit Reinspection
$50.00 /unit
Double the cost of
previous inspection
Second follow-up inspection
Subsequent additional/follow-up inspections
$50.00 /unit
Double the cost of
previous inspection
Failure to Appear at Scheduled Rental Inspection
$50.00
Fee for not showing up at scheduled inspection
$50.00
Rental Complaint Inspection
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2011
Existing Home Inspection (FMHA)
$75.00
$75.00
0.0%
2011
Parkland Dedication
Per subdivision ordinance
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
Refundable Deposit
Add'I staff time and follow-up is required for temp C.O.s.
Deposit of $500.00 required and will be refunded if final
within timeframe established by Building Department
Refundable Deposit
Temporary Permits, including footing and foundation
permits and preconstruction demolition
$125.00
Temporary permits allow limited work to be done prior to
complete plan submittal and review
$125.00
0.0%
2011
All other non-specified inspections'
$60.00
Minimum fee plus State surcharge
or the total hourly costs of the jurisdiction, whichever is
the greatest. The cost shall include supervision, overhead
equipment, hourly wages, and fringe benefits of the
employees involved.
$60.00
0.0%
2011
Fire Sprinkler Fees:
New or Additional Fire Sprinkler Systems
1.25%
Fee is equal to 1.25% (.0125) of the total fire sprinkler
contract amount, plus a State surcharge.
Minimum of $50 plus State surcharge.
1.25%
0.0%
2011
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 4 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Last
I
Chane
Change
Creekside
Gate Fee:
McLeod County resident leaves, grass clippings,
No Charge
ID required and bags emptied
No Charge
2001
and brush (under 6" in diameter)
Commercial Leaves and Grass Clippings
$10.00 /ton
$10.00 /ton
0.0%
2001
(bio-corp/paper bag - no plastic)
Commercial Leaves and Grass Clippings (plastic)
Not Accepted
Plastic determination is at the discretion of the monitor
Not Accepted
2001
and determined on a per load basis
Commercial Brush (under 6" in diameter)
No Charge
No Charge
2001
Logs (6" diameter or greater)
No Charge
No Charge
2001
Pallets and Crates
$24.00 /ton
$24.00 /ton
0.0%
2001
Stump Chips
No Charge
No Charge
2001
Clean Wood
No Charge
No Charge
2001
Concrete (Dirty)
$5.00 /ton
as determined by Creekside staff review
$5.00 /ton
0.0%
2001
Asphalt (Dirty)
$5.00 /ton
as determined by Creekside staff review
$5.00 /ton
0.0%
2001
Event Center
Great Room: Monday - Thursday
$325.00
Seating up to 525 dinner or 1,100 theatre
$325.00
0.0%
2014
Friday, Saturday, Holidays
$600.00
$600.00
0.0%
2014
Sunday
$400.00
$400.00
0.0%
2014
Linen Service Fee
$95.00
$95.00
0.0%
2013
Half Great Room: Monday - Thursday
$180.00
Seating up to 250 dinner or 550 theatre
$180.00
0.0%
2014
Friday, Saturday, Holidays
$350.00
$350.00
0.0%
2014
Sunday
$275.00
$275.00
0.0%
2014
Linen Service Fee
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2013
Quarter Great Room: Monday - Thursday
$90.00
Seating up to 100 dinner or 125 theatre
$90.00
0.0%
2001
Friday, Saturday, Holidays
$225.00
$225.00
0.0%
2014
Sunday
$150.00
$150.00
0.0%
2014
Linen Service Fee
$25.00
$25.00
0.0%
2013
Meeting Room: Ambassador
$20.00
Seating for 40 - two hour minimum
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Westlund
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2001
McCormick
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Program Room: Cash Wise
$125.00
Seating for 75 - two hour minimum
$125.00
0.0%
2013
MidCountry
$20.00
Seating for 15 - two hour minimum
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Steans
$20.00
Seating for 15 - two hour minimum
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Hoefer
$20.00
Seating for 15 - two hour minimum
$20.00
0.0%
2001
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 5 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 6 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
LCD Projector 3500 Lumen
$300.00
$300.00
0.0%
2001
LCD Projector 1100 Lumen
$100.00
$100.00
0.0%
2001
Overhead Projector
$27.00
$27.00
0.0%
2001
Slide Projector
$27.00
$27.00
0.0%
2001
Front Truss Screen 9X12
$83.00
$83.00
0.0%
2001
Rear Truss Screen 9X13
$117.00
$117.00
0.0%
2001
Podium
$10.00
$10.00
0.0%
2001
Podium with Microphone
$35.00
$35.00
0.0%
2001
Wireless Microphone
$35.00
$35.00
0.0%
2001
TV & VCR Lap top
$30.00
$30.00
0.0%
2001
VCR/DVD/CD Player
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Internet Connection
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2001
Piano
$25.00
$25.00
0.0%
2001
Security
$51 /hr/officer
For events with alcohol, we require at least one Hutchinson
police officer on duty until the end of the event (minimum of 4
hours). For groups of 250 or more, a second officer may be
required for the final 4 hours of the event. The fee for each
officer is $51 /hr. Please refer to "Rental Policy".
$51 /hr/officer
0.0%
2012
Refundable Damage Deposit
$300 /event
$300 /event
0.0%
2014
White Board/Stand 3X4
$11.00 /day
$11.00 /day
0.0%
2001
White Board/Stand 4X6
$14.00 /day
$14.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Coffee
$15.00 /30 cups Hutchinson Event Center catered events
$20.00 /50 cups Non HEC catered events
$15.00 /30 cups
$20.00 /50 cups
0.0%
0.0%
2014
2014
Tripod Screen 6'
$10.00 /day
$10.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Tripod Screen 8'
$15.00 /day
$15.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Food Fee -Large Group
$75.00 /day
$75.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Food Fee -Small Group
$50.00 /day
$50.00 /day
0.0%
2014
China/Flatware
$1.00 /place setting
Food vendor may add additional fees
$1.00 /place setting
0.0%
2013
Draper Easels
$5.00 /day
$5.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Speaker Phone
$20.00 /day
$20.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Evergreen Senior Dining
Dining Room & Kitchenette
$100.00
$100.00
0.0%
2009
Carpeted Room
$60.00
$60.00
0.0%
2009
After Hours Open or Lock-up
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2007
Damage Deposit
$100.00
Separate check to be returned when keys are returned
and if rooms are cleaned up and no damage has occurred
$100.00
0.0%
2007
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 6 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Finance
Returned check from the bank (NSF or Closed Account) $30.00 Covers bank charge $30.00 0.0% 2010
Returned electronic payment (ACH) from the bank $30.00 Covers bank charge $30.00 0.0% 2010
Returned on-line bank payments (Utility Billing) $35.00 Covers bank charge $35.00 0.0% 2014
Lodging Tax - City of Hutchinson 3.00% per City ordinance 116.01 3.00% 0.0% 1989
Lodging Tax - penalty for late payment 10.00% per City ordinance 116.22 10.00% 0.0% 1989
Local Option Sales Tax:
Applied to debt service on water and sewer facilities.
Local Sales Tax Rate
0.50%
On retail sales made within, or delivered within, the city limits
of Hutchinson. The tax applies to the same items that are
taxable under the Minnesota sales and use tax laws.
0.50%
0.0%
2012
Local Excise Tax
$20.00
Per new or used vehicle sold by a dealer located within
Hutchinson in lieu of Local Sales Tax Rate.
$20.00
0.0%
2012
Fire Department
Fire Engine $200.00 /hr each hour on scene $200.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
Grass Truck/Unit $100.00 /hr each hour on scene $100.00 /hr 0.0% 2010
HERT Trailer (Haz-Mat) $50.00 /hr Plus material and/or equipment used $50.00 /hr 0.0% 2010
Incident Commander (IC) $50.00 /hr each hour on scene $50.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
Certified Firefighter $30.00 /hr each hour on scene $30.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
Platform Truck $350.00 /hr each hour on scene $350.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
Rescue $200.00 /hr First hour on scene $200.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
$100.00 /hr Each hour after the first hour on scene $100.00 /hr 0.0% 2014
Water Tanker Truck $150.00 /hr each hour on scene $150.00 /hr 0.0% 2010
Fireworks:
Fireworks Only Business & Tent Sales $350.00 License fee is non-refundable, cannot be prorated, $350.00 0.0% 2010
(Jan 1 - Dec 31) and cannot be waived (Jan 1 - Dec 31)
Other retailers $100.00 License fee is non-refundable, cannot be prorated, $100.00 0.0% 2010
(Jan 1 - Dec 31) land cannot be waived (Jan 1 - Dec 31)
HRA
Pre Energy Audit $250 Post Energy Audit $150
$400.00
$450.00
-11.1 %
2015
Subordination Request Processing Fee
$100.00
$100.00
0.0%
2003
Duplicate Document Fee
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2007
Loan Processing:
CRPI Rehab Loan Admin Fee
CRNPI Rehab Loan Document Preparation
$2,600.00
$350.00
Owner match to CRPI
$2,600.00
$350.00
0.0%
0.0%
2015
2015
GMHF & CRV Gap Loan Admin Fee
$350.00
$350.00
0.0%
2006
SCDP Rental Rehab Project Loan Admin Fee
13.00%
% of SCDP Loan
13.00%
0.0%
2015
HRA Entry Cost Loan Admin Fee
$400.00
$400.00
0.0%
2014
Revolving New Const. Gap Loan Admin Fee
$700.00
N/A new in 2016
2016
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 7 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Credit Report Fee
$15.00
$15.00
0.0%
2000
Lead Risk Assessment
Single Family housing (1-4 units)
$475.00
$450.00
$550.00
single request
per unit, 2 or more requests at a time
MHFA Rehab Loan Program (additional samples required)
$450.00
$450.00
$450.00
5.6%
0.0%
22.2%
2008
2008
2008
Lead Clearance Testing
$250.00
$75.00
for one unit
for additional units up to 4 units
$150.00
$350.00
66.7%
-78.6%
2008
2015
MHFA Rehab Loan Program Admin Fee
14.00%
% of loan amount (changed from specific dollar amount)
14.00%
0.0%
2008
City Deferred Grants Administration Fee (TIF)
10.00%
% of loan amount
N/A new in 2016
2016
FUF/CFUF & HHILP Title Search Fee
$25.00
$25.00
0.0%
2008
FUF/CFUF & HHILP Loan Document Preparation Fee
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2008
FUF/CFUF & HHILP Loan Origination Fee
1.00%
% of loan amount
1.00%
0.0%
2008
HRA HILP Loan Application Fee
$350.00
N/A new in 2016
2L
Legal
Attorney's Fees for Litigation $100.00 /hr Charged per 1/4 hour $100.00 /hr 0.0% 2008
Paralegal's Fees for Litigation $50.00 /hr Charged per 1/4 hour $50.00 /hr 0.0% 2008
Contract Review Fee $100.00 /hr Charged per 1/4 hour $100.00 /hr 0.0% 2008
Attorney's Fees for Rental Registration Prosecution $100.00 /hr Charged per 1/4 hour $100.00 /hr 0.0% 2008
Paralegal's Fees for Rental Registration Prosecution $50.00 /hr Charged per 1/4 hour $50.00 /hr 0.0% 2008
Dangerous Dog Designation Hearing Up to $1,000.00 Up to $1,000.00 0.0% 2008
Licenses
Carnival
$525.00
Refundable deposit
$525.00
0.0%
2009
Dance Permit
$55.00
Short Term
$55.00
0.0%
2009
Short -Term Gambling
$30.00
Short Term
$30.00
0.0%
2009
Garbage & Refuse Haulers:
Commercial
Residential
Recycling
Recycling
$125.00
$125.00
$55.00
$30.00 /day
January 1 - December 31
January 1 -December 31
January 1 -December 31
Per Day
$125.00
$125.00
$55.00
$30.00 /day
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
2009
2009
Massage Services
$175.00
January 1 - December 31
$175.00
0.0%
2009
Motorized Golf Cart
$10.00
January 1 -December 31
$10.00
0.0%
2009
ATV
$45.00
3 year license
N/A new in 2016
2016
Notary Fee
$1.00
Per Notarized Item
$1.00
0.0%
2009
Peddler/Solicitor/Transient Merchant
$125.00
Per License
$125.00
0.0%
2009
Pawn Shops and Precious Metal Dealers
Second Hand Goods Dealers
$125.00
$125.00
January 1 -December 31
January 1 -December 31
$125.00
$125.00
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
Shows/Exhibitions
$100.00
Short Term
$100.00
0.0%
2010
Tattoo License
$175.00
January 1 -December 31
$175.00
0.0%
2009
Taxi Cab License (per cab)
1 $5.00 /cab
jJanuary 1 -December 31
1 $5.00 /cab
1 0.0%
1 2009
Tobacco License
1$175.00
1January 1 -December 31
1$175.00
1 0.0%
1 2009
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 8 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 9 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Rental Housing Registration
$10.00 /unit
$10.00 /unit
0.0%
2009
Food Cart
$125.00
$125.00
0.0%
2013
Liquor:
Club Liquor License
Under 200 Members
201 - 500 Members
501 - 1000 Members
1001 - 2000 Members
2001 - 4000 Members
4001 - 6000 Members
Over 6000 Members
$300.00
$500.00
$650.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
Maximum fee amount set by state statute
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
January 1 - December 31
$300.00
$500.00
$650.00
$800.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
Consumption & Display
$250.00 January 1 - December 31
$25.00 /event Temporary
$250.00
$25.00 /event
0.0%
0.0%
2012
Wine License
$425.00
January 1 - December 31
$425.00
0.0%
2009
On -Sale Intoxicating Malt Liquor & Wine License
$600.00
January 1 -December 31
$600.00
0.0%
2009
On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License
$2,000.00
January 1 -December 31 (prorate; refundable)
$2,000.00
0.0%
2015
On -Sale Sunday Intoxicating Liquor License
$125.00
$100.00
January 1 -December 31
Temporary License (One Day)
$125.00
$100.00
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License
$425.00
$75.00
January 1 - December 31 (nonrefundable)
Short Term
$425.00
$75.00
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2013
Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License
$300.00
January 1 -December 31 (nonrefundable)
$300.00
0.0%
2009
Temporary Liquor License
$125.00 minimum
$125.00 minimum
0.0%
2013
Intoxicating Liquor Investigations
$375.00
Nonrefundable
$375.00
0.0%
2009
3.2 Malt Liquor Investigations
$125.00
Nonrefundable
$125.00
0.0%
2009
Caterer's Permit
$100.00 Per Event
$300.00 Annual
$100.00
$300.00
0.0%
0.0%
2010
2010
Brewer (off -sale)
$375.00 Annual
$375.00
0.0%
2014
Brew pub off -sale
$375.00 Annual
$375.00
0.0%
2014
Taproom (on -sale)
$600.00
Annual
$600.00
0.0%
2014
Mapping and Printing
Comprehensive Plan
Book
DC
Color Copy with Foldouts
Web Copy
$25.00
$15.00
$75.00
No Charge
Four books
$25.00
$15.00
$75.00
No Charge
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
2009
Subdivision Ordinance
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2009
Zoning Manual
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2009
Zoning/Shoreland/Subdivision Manual
$40.00
$40.00
0.0%
2009
Joint Planning Area Zoning Manual
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2009
Subdivision Agreement
$1.00 /page
$1.00 /page
0.0%
2009
8 1/2" X 11"- Black & White print
$0.25 /page
$0.25 /page
2009
8 1/2" X 11"- Color print
$1.50 /page
$1.50 /page
0.0%
2009
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 9 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 10 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type 2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Legal or Tabloid Size - Black & White print
$1.00 /page
$1.00 /page
0.0%
2009
Legal or Tabloid Size - Color print
$3.00 /page
$3.00 /page
0.0%
2009
18" X 24" - Black & White print
$1.50 /page
$1.50 /page
0.0%
2009
18" X 24" - Color print
$4.50 /page
$4.50 /page
0.0%
2009
24" X 36" - Black & White print
$3.00 /page
$3.00 /page
0.0%
2009
24" X 36" - Color print
$9.00 /page
Small city zoning map
$9.00 /page
0.0%
2009
36" X 36" - Black & White print
$4.50 /page
$4.50 /page
0.0%
2009
36" X 36" - Color print
$14.00 /page
$14.00 /page
0.0%
2009
36" X 48" - Black & White print
$6.00 /page
$6.00 /page
0.0%
2009
36" X 48" - Color print
$18.00 /page
$18.00 /page
0.0%
2009
Roll Paper Printing
$1.50 /sq.ft.
$1.50 /sq.ft.
0.0%
2009
Specialty Map preparation
$27.50 /hr Map printing at charges noted above; one hour minimum,
1/4 hour increments thereafter; must be approved by
the City IT Director
$27.50 /hr
0.0%
2009
81/2"X11"
$5.00
Color orthophoto prints
$5.00
0.0%
2009
Legal or Tabloid
$9.00
Color orthophoto prints
$9.00
0.0%
2009
18" X 24"
$20.00
Color orthophoto prints
$20.00
0.0%
2009
24" X 36"
$30.00
Color orthophoto prints
$30.00
0.0%
2009
36" X 36"
$40.00
Color orthophoto prints
$40.00
0.0%
2009
36" X 48"
$50.00
IColor orthophoto prints
$50.00
0.0%
2009
Digital Data Orthophoto
$550 /sq.mile
Minimum charge of $550.00
$550 /sq.mile
0.0%
2009
Digital Data Contours
$550 /sq.mile
Minimum charge of $550.00
$550 /sq.mile
0.0%
2009
Digital Data Planimetrics
$250 /sq.mile
Minimum charge of $250.00
$250 /sq.mile
0.0%
2009
Purchase a combination of all three data sets for $1,350 /sq.mile not to exceed a maximum charge of $18,100
Special mapping requests = Data Price + $50 /hr
All data is provided in Arcview Shape File format on a CD
An additional $50 charge will be applied to digital data converted to a .dxf format for CAD systems
The City reserves the right to waive fees by Council direction for other governmental organizations. Commercial -type printing of private,
non -city materials (i.e. building plans, site drawings, etc) or map preparation for private use is not allowed.
Parks, Recreation & Community Education
Youth Sports/Activities:
Adaptive Recreation
$4.00 /session
per session
$4.00 /session
0.0%
2009
T -Ball / Baseball (K - Grade 2)
$40.00
14 sessions
$40.00
0.0%
2013
Girls Softball (Grades 1 - 4)
$40.00
14 sessions
$40.00
0.0%
2013
Baseball (Grades 2 - 5)
$40.00
14 sessions
$40.00
0.0%
2013
Basketball: Preschool
K - Grade 2
Grades 3 - 4
Grades 5 - 6
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$70.00
7 sessions
7 sessions
14 sessions
24 sessions
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$70.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2011
2011
2013
2013
Football: Flag
Tackle
$30.00
$50.00
7 sessions
14 sessions
$30.00
$50.00
0.0%2013
0.0°k
2013
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 10 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Last
Chane
Change
Soccer: Indoor
$25.00
6 sessions
$25.00
0.0%
2013
Outdoor: Grades K-3
$35.00
6 sessions
$35.00
0.0%
2011
Outdoor: Grades 4-6
$40.00
12 sessions
$40.00
0.0%
2013
Figure Skating: Tots -Delta
$57.00
14 sessions
$57.00
0.0%
2013
Sunday Practice
$67.00
14 sessions
$67.00
0.0%
2013
Open Skating Pass: Students/Seniors
$45.00
$45.00
0.0%
2011
Adults
$55.00
$55.00
0.0%
2011
Families
$75.00
$75.00
0.0%
2011
Open Skating: Sunday
$2.00 /day
per youth per day
$2.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Non -School Days
$3.00 /day
per adult per day
$3.00 /day
0.0%
2001
School Days
$2.00 /day
per adult per day
$2.00 /day
0.0%
2001
School Days
$3.00 /day
per family per day
$3.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Family Hour
$3.00 /day
per adults
$3.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Family Hour
$5.00 /day
per family
$5.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Swimming Lessons
$38.00
10 lessons
$38.00
0.0%
2011
Open Swim
$3.00 /day
per person per day
$3.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Open Swim Family Hour
$6.00 /day
per family
$6.00 /day
0.0%
2001
Swim Package
$25.00
10 swims
$25.00
0.0%
2001
Swim Package
$30.00
senior citizen
$30.00
0.0%
2001
Household Swim Package:
1 member
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2011
2 members
$60.00
$60.00
0.0%
2011
3 members
$70.00
$70.00
0.0%
2011
4 members
$80.00
$80.00
0.0%
2011
5 members
$90.00
$90.00
0.0%
2011
6 members
$100.00
$100.00
0.0%
2011
7 members
$110.00
$110.00
0.0%
2011
Adult Sports:
Men's Basketball
$12.00
per game per team
$12.00
0.0%
2013
Slowpitch Softball (Umpired Leagues)
$12.00
per game per team
$12.00
0.0%
2013
Volleyball: Co-Rec
$12.00
per match per team
$12.00
0.0%
2013
Men's
$12.00
per match per team
$12.00
0.0%
2013
Sand
$50.00
per team 10 matches
$50.00
0.0%
2013
Women's
$12.00
per match per team
$12.00
0.0%
2013
Open Basketball
$2.00
per person
$2.00
0.0%
2001
Open Hockey
$5.00 /day
per person per day
$5.00 /day
0.0%
2001
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 11 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Other Fees:
West River Park Camping:
Electric Hook -Up
Water, Sewer, Electric
$20.00
$25.00
$20.00
$25.00
0.0%
0.0%
2014
2014
Field Rental
$15.00
1 1/2 hours
$15.00
0.0%
2014
VMF Field: Day Game
Night Game
$40.00
$80.00
$40.00
$80.00
0.0%
0.0%
2014
2014
Shelter reservation
$20.00
$40.00
per day
or or
$20.00
$40.00
0.0%
0.0%
2007
2014
Depot building rental - 25 Adams St SE
$10.00 /hr
4 hour minimum
N/A new in 2016
2016
Church rental - 105 2nd Ave SE
$50.00 /hr
2 hour minimum
N/A new in 2016
2016
Bleachers
$20.00
per 3 rows
$20.00
0.0%
2007
Picnic Tables
$15.00
With three-day rental, will move tables; four table minimum
$10.00
50.0%
2007
Garden Plot
$35.00
10' x 20'
$35.00
0.0%
2009
Open Gym Daily
$3.00
per person
$3.00
0.0%
2014
Open Gym Pass
$45.00
per person
$45.00
0.0%
2014
Indoor Playground: Child
Family
$2.00
$3.00
per child
per family
$2.00
$3.00
0.0%
0.0%
2009
2009
Family Playground Pass
$45.00
$45.00
0.0%
2014
Rec Center and Civic Arena (dry floor):
First Full Day
Half Day
Additional Day
Youth
$600.00
$350.00
$300.00
$40.00 /hr
per day
1/2 day
each additional day
per hour
$600.00
$350.00
$300.00
$40.00 /hr
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2001
2010
2001
2013
Rec Center: Basketball Rental
Volleyball Rental
Swimming Pool
Lobby
$20.00
$17.50
$60.00
$15.00
per court per hour
per court per hour
per hour
per hour
$20.00
$17.50
$60.00
$15.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2013
2009
2009
2009
Civic Arena: Ice Time
Summer Ice
$150.00 /hr
$150.00 /hr
per hour
per hour
$150.00 /hr
$150.00 /hr
0.0%
0.0%
2013
2013
Roberts Park Tournament Fee
$45.00
per field per day
$45.00
0.0%
2013
Transfers
$4.00
per person per class
$4.00
0.0%
2010
Cancellations
$4.00
deducted from refund
$4.00
0.0%
2010
***Team Fees Are Non -Refundable'
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 12 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Last
I
Chane
Change
Plan Review
Plan Review is 65% of the building permit fee
Plan Review Fee for similar plans is 25% of Building Permit Fee (per MN Rule 1300.0160)
All other non-specified valuations to be determined by Building Official.
State Surcharge Fee:
Permits with Fixed Fees
$5.00
Surcharge for mobile home, demolition, moving, excavation,
$5.00
0.0%
2011
$1.00 after 6/30/2015
residential reroof, residential reside, residential window or
door replacement, and utility sheds over 200 sq.ft.
Valuation up to $1,000,000
Mil (.0005) X
Mil (.0005) X Valuations up to $1,000,000
Mil (.0005) X
2011
Valuations
Valuations
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000
Valuation -
Valuation - $1,000,000 X.0004 + $500.00
Valuation -
2011
$1,000,000 X.0004
$1,000,000 X.0004
+$500.00
+$500.00
$2,000,000 to $3,000,000
Valuation -
Valuation - $2,000,000 X.0003 + $900.00
Valuation -
2011
$2,000,000 X.0003
$2,000,000 X.0003
+$900.00
+$900.00
$3,000,000 to $4,000,000
Valuation -
Valuation - $3,000,000 X.0002 + $1,200.00
Valuation -
2011
$3,000,000 X.0002
$3,000,000 X.0002
+$1,200.00
+$1,200.00
$4,000,000 to $5,000,000
Valuation -
Valuation - $4,000,000 X.0001 + $1,400.00
Valuation -
2011
$4,000,000 X.0001
$4,000,000 X.0001
+$1,400.00
+$1,400.00
$5,000,000 and over
Valuation -
Valuation - $5,000,000 X .00005 + $1,500.00
Valuation -
2011
$5,000,000 X.00005
$5,000,000 X.00005
+$1,500.00
+$1,500.00
Planning and Land Use
Variances
$300.00
Includes recording fees
$300.00
0.0%
2011
Conditional Use Permits
$300.00
Includes recording fees
$300.00
0.0%
2011
Rezoning
$375.00
Includes recording fees
$375.00
0.0%
2011
Vacation of street, alley, or easement
$375.00
Includes recording fees
$375.00
0.0%
2011
Lot Splits (Single and Two Family)
$175.00
Includes recording fees
$175.00
0.0%
2011
Lot Splits (Multiple Family, Commercial, Industrial)
$250.00
Includes recording fees
$250.00
0.0%
2011
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
$300.00
$300.00
0.0%
2011
Planned Unit Development
$500.00
Includes recording fees
$500.00
0.0%
2011
Platting: Preliminary Plat
$400.00
Plus recording and legal fees
$400.00
0.0%
2011
+ $10 per lot
+ $10 per lot
Final Plat
$200.00
Plus recording and legal fees
$200.00
0.0%
2011
+ $10 per lot
+ $10 per lot
Site Plan
$250.00
$250.00
0.0%
2011
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 13 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 14 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Annexation
$450.00
Includes annexation fee to be paid to State
$450.00
0.0%
2011
+ $5 per acre
+ $5 per acre
Sign Permit
$1.00 /sq.ft.
$60.00 minimum
Per square foot with a minimum fee of $60.00
$1.00 /sq.ft.
$60.00 minimum
0.0%
2011
Sandwich Board Sign Permit
$60.00
Per year
$60.00
0.0%
2011
Portable/Temporary Sign Permit
$60.00
Per permit, three permits per calendar year
$60.00
0.0%
2011
Fence Permit
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2011
After the Fact
Double permit fee
Double permit fee
Special Meeting
Double permit fee
Includes $30 payment to Planning Commissioners
in attendance
Double permit fee
Zoning Letters
$30.00
Per property address
$30.00
0.0%
2011
Flood Zoning Letters
$30.00
Per property address
$30.00
0.0%
2011
Trees
$300.00
Per tree
$300.00
0.0%
2012
Residential Curb Cut, Driveway Apron, and Hard
Surfacing Driveway Permit
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2011
Commercial Parking Lot overlay
$150.00
N/A new in 2016
2016
Commercial Parking Lot Reconstruction
$300.00
N/A new in 2016
2016
NOTE: Application fees include public hearing publication, preparation of maps, public notice mailings, agenda preparation, meetings, site visits,
filing fees for the County, administrative expenses, etc.
Police Department
Animal License Tag (Dog/Cat)
$10.00
$10.00
0.0%
2007
Dangerous Dog Designation Registration
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2009
Animal Impound
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2007
Animal Maintenance/Kennel Fee:
Initial kennel fee - first day
Dogs - kennel fee after first day
Cats - kennel fee after first day
Vaccination fee
Testing fee
$35.00
$16.00 /day
$11.00 /day
$5.00
$25.00
applies to both cats and dogs
per day following the initial kennel fee
per day following the initial kennel fee
applies to both cats and dogs
applies to cats only
$35.00
$16.00 /day
$11.00 /day
$5.00
$25.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
Vehicle Impound Storage
$10.00 /day
Per day
$10.00 /day
0.0%
2007
Court Ordered Breath Tests
$25.00 /week
Per week
$25.00 /week
0.0%
2007
Finger Printing
$20.00
$20.00
0.0%
2007
Police Report Copies:
Walk In
Mail or Fax
$0.25 /page
$5.00
Per page
$0.25 /page
$5.00
0.0%
0.0%
2007
2007
Police Service of Papers
$45.00
$45.00
0.0%
2015
Photographs
$2.00 /page
Per page
$2.00 /page
0.0%
2007
Audio/Video Magnetic Media
$30.00 /item
Per item
$30.00 /item
0.0%
2007
Bicycle Licenses
$5.00
$5.00
0.0%
2007
Automated Pawn Services
$1.50
1
$1.50
0.0%
2007
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 14 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 15 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Citizen Weapon Storage
$1.00 /day New state law allows citizens to bring personal weapons into
the Police Department for safekeeping.
$1.00 /day
0.0%
2015
The following are court assessed fees for violation of specific ordinances.
ATV Traffic Control Regulations
$125.00
73.15
$125.00
0.0%
2012
City Parking Lots & Rams
$25.00
72.08
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Dog at Large
$50.00
Ordinance No. 93.18
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Dog Without License
$25.00
93.18
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Drive through private property to avoid traffic control device
$85.00
71.08
$85.00
0.0%
2012
Emergency Parking Prohibition
$100.00
72.05
$100.00
0.0%
2012
Equipment Requirements/Muffler
$50.00
73.03
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Excessive Vehicle Noise Prohibited
$85.00
71.11
$85.00
0.0%
2012
Fail to Remove Animal Waste
$30.00
93.01
$30.00
0.0%
2012
Fire Lanes; Rush Hour Traffic
$50.00
72.13
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Loading Zone
$25.00
72.09
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Moto r-home/Trai le r/Rec vehicle park restriction
$25.00
72.07
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Motorized Scooters
$85.00
73.17
$85.00
0.0%
2012
No Burning Permit in Possession
$100.00
92.62
$100.00
0.0%
2012
No Parking
$25.00
Ordinance No. 72.04 (b) 3
$25.00
0.0%
2012
No Parking -Bike Lane
$25.00
70.05
$25.00
0.0%
2012
No Parking -Snow Emergency
$50.00
72.15
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Nuisance Parking
$25.00
Ordinance No. 92.19
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Parallel Parking
$25.00
72.02
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Parking for Advertising or Sale Prohibited
$50.00
72.11
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Parking/Standing/Stopping Prohibited
$25.00
72.01
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Physically Handicapped Parking
$200.00
72.12
$200.00
0.0%
2012
Possession of uncased loaded firearm
$125.00
130.05
$125.00
0.0%
2012
Residential zoning district violation
$40.00
154.056
$40.00
0.0%
2012
Traffic Congestion Street/Restriction/Exemption
$25.00
71.06
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Truck Parking Restricted
$25.00
72.06
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Use of Bike/Skateboards/Rollerskates/Like
$25.00
73.31
$25.00
0.0%
2012
U -Turns Restriction
$25.00
71.04
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Vehicle repair on street/public parking lot restriction
$85.00
72.1
$85.00
0.0%
2012
Violate Angle Parking Ordinance
$25.00
72.03
$25.00
0.0%
2012
Violate motorized golf cart ordinance
$50.00
173.16
$50.00 1
0.0% 1
2012
Violation of Time Limit Parking
$25.00
172.04
$25.00 1
0.0% 1
2012
Water Shortages/Rest Use/Hours
$100.00
jordinance No. 52.06
$100.00 1
0.0% 1
2012
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 15 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Last
Chane
Change
Public Works
Engineering:
" Design Review
3.00%
Review of site and grading plans and/or plans and
3.00%
0.0%
2002
specifications prepared by developer, or preliminary
engineering of reconstruction plans.
Final Design
6.00%
Preparation of project plans and specifications in-house.
6.00%
0.0%
2002
Construction Review and Staking
6.00%
Includes on-site and off-site construction services. Private
6.00%
0.0%
2002
developers must provide survey control and may complete
this work with a consultant approved by the City and pay
these costs directly.
" Preliminary Development
1.00%
Plan review, City approval process, and preparation of
1.00%
0.0%
2002
developer, subdivision and/or development agreements.
Contact Administration
2.00%
Assessment roll preparation, MN Statute 429 review, and
2.00%
0.0%
2002
contract administration and review.
" Comprehensive Planning
2.00%
Comprehensive/infrastructure/system planning and
2.00%
0.0%
2014
improvement project studies/reports.
Topographic Mapping
1.00%
GIS system and topographic mapping administration.
1.00%
0.0%
2014
" Housing needs fund
1.00%
Funding for HRA program supporting housing needs within
1.00%
0.0%
2002
the community. The HRA Board may waive this fee on
projects meeting HRA Housing goals. Not applied to
reconstruction or trunk utility improvements.
Standard City Rate:
Redevelopment/Newly Annexed
21.00%
Redevelopment and newly annexed (does not include
21.00%
0.0%
2014
"Housing Needs Fund")
New Development
22.00%
New development (includes "Housing Needs Fund"). The
22.00%
0.0%
2014
City retains the right to approve which projects will be
completed utilizing municipal financing based on guidelines
approved by the City Council.
Developer Designed & Financed Rate
7.00%
Minimum rate, including all items noted with asterisk (').
7.00%
0.0%
2014
Private development projects utilizing more City services will
be charged based on rates noted above.
Hutchinson HRA may waive the 1 % Housing Needs Fund fee
based on low-income housing being included in the project.
Engineering: Plans & Specs (paper)
$80.00
Per set fee
$80.00
0.0%
2002
Engineering: Plans & Specs (download set)
$20.00
Per set fee
$20.00
0.0%
2002
The City retains the right to engage a consultant to complete a portion of the Engineering and Project Administration. The developer shall have the
preliminary and final plat approved prior to work commencing on final design. Financial assurance/bonding may be required for improvement being
completed by private developers. The developer shall meet all design standards and financial surety requirements of the City.
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 16 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Typical Residential Improvement Assessment Rates:
Total street reconstruction $80.00 Per adjusted front foot $80.00 0.0% 2010
Partial street reconstruction $65.00 Per adjusted front foot $65.00 0.0% 2013
Street rehabilitation $52.50 Per adjusted front foot $52.50 0.0% 2013
Mill/overlay of street $30.00 Per adjusted front foot $30.00 0.0% 2010
Water service lateral $3,000.00 or based on actual construction costs $3,000.00 0.0% 2010
Sewer service lateral $3,000.00 or based on actual construction costs $3,000.00 0.0% 2010
SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) $2,300.00 Residential per MCES criteria & Commercial/Industrial per $2,300.00 0.0% 2011
MCES with initial unit + 50% of additional units
WAC (Water Availability Charge) $1,750.00 Residential per MCES criteria & Commercial/Industrial per $1,750.00 0.0% 2011
MCES with initial unit + 50% of additional units
Assessment Search $30.00 $30.00 0.0% 2011
Water Rates:
Base charge
$7.35
Per water meter
$7.35
0.0%
2011
Usage (Residential, Retail, Commercial, Industrial)
To 150,000 gallons per month
151,000 to 3,000,000 gallons per month
Over 3,000,000 gallons per month
$4.34
$3.18
$2.36
$4.34
$3.18
$2.36
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2011
2011
2011
Water Service Repair
$0.50
Per water meter per month
$0.50
0.0%
2011
Bulk water
$45.00
Deposit for key rental
$45.00
0.0%
2011
Key rental fee (Month or partial month)
$45.00
Month or partial month
$45.00
0.0%
2011
Lost key
$585.00
$585.00
0.0%
2011
Set up fee
$25.00
Set up fee for putting a metered valve onto a hydrant for bulk
water loading / use
N/A new in 2016
2016
Per load
$20.00
South Park loaded by City staff
$20.00
0.0%
2011
Per load
$20.00
2 load/day, hydrant fills
$20.00
0.0%
2011
Load Charge
$8.00
per 1,000 gallon (rounded to nearest 1,000 ga.)
$20 minimum
$8.00
0.0%
2015
Disconnect/Reconnecting Accounts
Leaving for Winter, or foreclosures (scheduled)
Delinquent Accounts
Reconnect after hours, weekends, holiday
$30.00
$40.00
$100.00
$30 for disconnect; $30 for reconnect
$40 for disconnect; $40 for reconnect
$30.00
$40.00
$100.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2011
2011
2011
Water Meter Fees:
3/4" X 5/8" $265.00 Connections and flanges included $140.00 89.3% 2011
1" $360.00 ' meter pricing includes water meter transmitter $235.00 53.2% 2011
1.5" Turbo $1,075.00 $830.00 29.5% 2015
1.5' Compound $1,510.00 $1,180.00 28.0% 2015
2" Compound $1,730.00 $1,600.00 8.1% 2011
2" Turbo $1,250.00 $915.00 36.6% 2014
3" Compound $2,150.00 Water department staff will approve/disapprove or $2,150.00 0.0% 2011
3" Turbo $1,540.00 require application of turbo or compound meters. $1,200.00 28.3% 2014
4" Compound $3,550.00 $3,250.00 9.2% 2011
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 17 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 18 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
I Change
4" Turbo
$2,775.00
Water department staff will approve/disapprove or
require application of turbo or compound meters.
$2,400.00
15.6%
2011
6" Compound $6,000.00
$5,900.00 1.7%
2011
6" Turbo $4,890.00
$3,900.00 25.4%
2014
Water meter testing fee
$50.00
Plus all direct costs for testing by others
$50.00
0.0%
2012
Water meter transmitter
1$125.00
jAs needed, determined by the Water Dept.
$125.00
1 0.0%
1 2015
Telecommunications Application Fee:
Single User per frequency pair
$336.00
$336.00
0.0%
2012
Multi-user PCS
$775.00
$775.00
0.0%
2012
Multi-user ESMR
$1,059.00
$1,059.00
0.0%
2012
Lease rates
Negotiated
Negotiated
Sewer Rates:
Base charge (CATEGORY A)
$6.41
Per connection
$6.41
0.0%
2011
Usage (CATEGORY A)
$6.42
Based upon January/February 30 day avg water usage
$6.42
0.0%
2011
Base charge (CATEGORY B)
$6.41
Per connection
$6.41
0.0%
2011
Usage (CATEGORY B)
$5.75
Based upon January/February 30 day avg water usage
$5.75
0.0%
2011
Load charges:
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
Total Kjedahl Nitrogen (TKN)
Suspended Solids
Phosphorous (P)
$0.43
$1.16
$0.40
$5.82
Greater than 140 mg/I
Greater than 50 mg/I
Greater than 310 mg/I
Greater than 6 mg/I
$0.43
$1.16
$0.40
$5.82
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2010
2010
2010
2010
Industrial Pretreatment Program Fees:
New permit application fee
Sewer users < 25,000 gals/day and Haulers
Sewer users > 25,000 gals/day
$100.00
$400.00
Permit application fee
Permit application fee
$100.00
$400.00
0.0%
0.0%
2006
2006
Annual Permit Fee
Haulers
Sewer Users < 25,000 gals/day
Sewer Users 25,000 to 100,000 gals/day
Sewer Users > 100,000 gals/day
Annual site inspection fee
$100.00
$700.00
$1,400.00
$2,100.00
$100.00
per year
per year
per year
per year
$100.00
$700.00
$1,400.00
$2,100.00
$100.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
Sampling and Lab costs
at Cost
at Cost
2006
State and Legal Costs
at Cost
at Cost
2006
Limits Exceedance Fees
$150.00
per pollutant per sampling period
$150.00
0.0%
2006
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 18 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
I Change
Hauling Waste Fees
Portable Toilets Waste
Truck tipping fee
$6.00
per 100 gallons
$6.00
0.0%
2006
Municipal WWTP Sludge
Truck tipping fee
Sludge volume fee
$50.00
$325.00
per truck load
1per dry ton
$50.00
1$325.00
0.0%
1 0.0%
2006
1 2006
Storm Water Utility:
Golf Course, Park, Open Space $5.24 $4.84 8.3% 2015
Single & Two -Family Residential $4.03 $3.72 8.3% 2015
Public/Private School & Institutional $20.36 $18.79 8.4% 2015
Multi -Family Residential & Church $28.94 $26.71 8.3% 2015
Commercial & Industrial $51.78 $47.80 8.3% 2015
Lots 1 to 2 acres $7.01 $6.47 8.3% 2015
Lots 2 to 3 acres $12.23 $11.29 8.3% 2015
Lots 3 to 4 acres $17.43 $16.09 8.3% 2015
Lots 4 to 5 acres $22.66 $20.92 8.3% 2015
Lots over 5 acres See Resolution No. 11637
Drainage/Erosion Control permit $35.00 Drainage connection $35.00 0.0% 2012
$35.00 < 5,000 ft 2 disturbed $35.00 0.0% 2012
$100.00 5,000 ft2 - 1 acre disturbed $100.00 0.0% 2012
$200.00 1 to 5 acres disturbed $200.00 0.0% 2012
$300.00 More than 5 acres disturbed $300.00 0.0% 2012
Garbage Rates:
Standard weekly service
30 -gallon container
60 -gallon container
90 -gallon container
$20.12
$29.02
$39.92
per month charge
per month charge
per month charge
$20.12
$29.02
$39.92
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2008
2008
2008
Standard bi-weekly service
30 -gallon container
60 -gallon container
90 -gallon container
$14.16
N/A
N/A
per month charge
not available
not available
$14.16
N/A
N/A
0.0%
2008
Weekly valet service
30 -gallon container
60 -gallon container
90 -gallon container
$28.46
$37.36
$48.26
per month charge
per month charge
per month charge
$28.46
$37.36
$48.26
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2008
2008
2008
Senior Citizens/Low Income Rate
Bi -weekly standard service
Bi -weekly valet service (low income)
Senior citizen reduced rate (low income)
Senior citizen reduced valet
Senior citizen reduced bi-weekly valet
$14.16
$19.79
$2.50
$10.84
$6.67
30 -gallon container; per month charge
30 -gallon container, per month charge
per month charge
per month charge
1per month charge
$14.16
$19.79
$2.50
$10.84
$6.67
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1 0.0%
2008
2008
2008
2008
2008
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 19 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
Cemetery:
Flush marker grave space
$750.00
$750.00
0.0%
2012
Upright memorial grave space
$980.00
$980.00
0.0%
2012
Second right of interment
$410.00
$410.00
0.0%
2012
Baby section grave space
$135.00
$135.00
0.0%
2012
Flush marker cremation grave space
$410.00
$410.00
0.0%
2012
Upright memorial cremation grave space
$980.00
$980.00
0.0%
2012
Cremation grave space
$410.00
$410.00
0.0%
2012
Columbarium Niches Upper 3 rows
Lower 2 rows
Columbarium Shelter - all units
$1,650.00
$1,295.00
$1,950.00
$1,650.00
$1,295.00
$1,950.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2012
2012
2015
Replacement Bronze Plaque
$360.00
$360.00
0.0%
2012
Weekday interment
$750.00
$750.00
0.0%
2012
Weekend/Holiday interment
$980.00
$980.00
0.0%
2012
Winter weekday interment
$880.00
$880.00
0.0%
2012
Winter weekend/holiday interment
$1,085.00
$1,085.00
0.0%
2012
Weekday Baby interment
$285.00
$285.00
0.0%
2012
Weekend/Holiday Baby interment
$515.00
$515.00
0.0%
2012
Winter weekday Baby interment
$570.00
$570.00
0.0%
2012
Winter weekend/holiday Baby interment
$620.00
$620.00
0.0%
2012
Weekday cremation in -ground inurnment
$395.00
$395.00
0.0%
2015
Weekend/Holiday cremation in -ground inurnment
$625.00
$625.00
0.0%
2015
Winter weekday cremation in -ground inurnment
$510.00
$510.00
0.0%
2015
Winter weekend/holiday cremation in -ground inurnment
$735.00
$735.00
0.0%
2015
Vaulted cremains (additional charge)
$230.00
$230.00
0.0%
2012
Inurnment - Columbaria: Weekday
Weekend/Holiday
Winter weekday
Winter weekend/holiday
$360.00
$570.00
$465.00
$670.00
$360.00
$570.00
$465.00
$670.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2015
2015
2015
2015
Disinterment
$1,550.00
$1,550.00
0.0%
2012
Holding vault fee
$130.00
$130.00
0.0%
2012
Stone setting permit
$80.00
$80.00
0.0%
2012
Cemetery deed transfer
$15.00
Rate set by Statute
$15.00
0.0%
2008
Chapel rental
$260.00
Per 1/2 day
$260.00
0.0%
2012
Memorial Bench Program
Single bronze plaque
Double bronze plaque
Engraved name/date per space
$520.00
$725.00
$260.00
$520.00
$725.00
$260.00
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2012
2012
2012
Commemorative Bench Program
No memorial on bench; placed by Cemetery
Recording fee
$2,375.00
$80.00
$2,375.00
$80.00
0.0%
0.0%
2012
2012
Affidavit of Ownership
$80.00
IClaim of ownership by decent of title
$80.00
0.0%
2012
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 20 of 21 12/14/2015
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 21 of 21 12/14/2015
City of Hutchinson
2016 Fee Schedule
Fee Type
2016 Fees
Notes
2016 Fees
%
Chane
Last
Change
H.A.T.S. Facility:
Building Service Charge (Hutchinson)
$99,755.00
per year
$96,850.00
3.0%
2015
Building Service Charge (Mn/DOT)
$76,735.00
per year
$74,500.00
3.0%
2015
Building Service Charge (McLeod)
$79,310.00
per year
$77,000.00
3.0%
2015
Fuel Charges
$0.12
$0.12
0.0%
2009
Airport:
City -owned hangars:
Hangars #1 /9-1/18
$40.00
Per month.
$40.00
0.0%
2014
Hangars #2/1-2/8
$85.00
Per month.
$85.00
0.0%
2015
Hangars #3/2-3/4; 3/6-3/8
$120.00
Per month.
$120.00
0.0%
2014
Hangars #3/1 & 3/5
$210.00
Per month.
$210.00
0.0%
2014
Hangars #4/1-4/8
$110.00
Per month.
$110.00
0.0%
2015
City -owned storage spaces - Hangar #4
$40.00
Per month.
$40.00
0.0%
2014
Privately -owned hangar spaces:
General Aviation
$0.0380
per sq. ft. every other year (next adjustment in 2018)
$0.0363
4.7%
2014
Commercial
$0.1260
per sq. ft. every other year (next adjustment in 2018)
$0.1202
4.8%
2014
Operations & Maintenance:
Labor rate
$50.00 /hr Add $20/hr for premium/overtime pay
$50.00 /hr
0.0%
2012
Administrative fee
$50.00
$50.00
0.0%
2010
Mailbox reimbursement
$250.00
Reimbursement to property owners for damaged mailbox not
200.00
25.0%
2015
repaired by City staff.
Asphalt patching material
$270.00 /ton
Per ton
$250.00 /ton
8.0%
2012
Other materials
Quoted
IQuoted
Equipment rental rates
Minimum Charge - See most recent FEMA reimbursement
rates + 20% + Operator Cost + Fuel
I:\Finance\FEE SCHEDULES\2016 Fee Schedule\2016 Fee Schedule - Preliminary Page 21 of 21 12/14/2015
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Resolution 14496 Transfer Funds to 2015 Construction Fund and General Fund
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes):
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
This resolution identifies transfers from various funds to the 2015 Construction Fund to finance project costs that
were not financed by assessments, bond proceeds or other aid dollars. Also identified is a transfer from the 2015
Construction Fund to the General Fund to cover the City's engineering fees that were factored into the project costs.
Lastly, a transfer from the 2015 Construction Fund to the Capital Projects fund as the funding source for future
comprehensive planning and other planning projects as approved by council from time to time. The two transfers out
of the 2015 Construction Fund are funded by the bond proceeds.
The transfers from the enterprise funds help to keep our annual bonding requirement at the level dictated by our Debt
Management Plan. Without enterprise fund transfers, we would either have to reduce our project scope for street
projects or increase our debt.
All transfers in this resolution were reviewed by Public Works, Finance and Administration and presented to the
Resource Allocation Committee as the annual improvement projects were discussed.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve fund transfers per Resolution 14496.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14496
TRANSFERRING FROM WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER,
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT AND CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
TO THE 2015 IMPROVEMENT BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND
AND
FROM THE 2015 IMPROVEMENT BOND CONSTRUCTION FUND
TO THE GENERAL FUND & CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
FOR ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION FEES
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT, $233,913 is hereby transferred from the Water Fund to the 2015 Construction Fund.
THAT, $35,880 is hereby transferred from the Sewer Fund to the 2015 Construction Fund.
THAT, $127,454 is hereby transferred from the Storm Water Fund to the
2015 Construction Fund.
THAT, $111,369 is hereby transferred from the Community Improvement Fund to the
2015 Construction Fund.
THAT, $218,766 is hereby transferred from the Capital Projects Fund fund to the
2015 Construction Fund.
THAT, $419,058 is hereby transferred from the 2015 Construction Fund to the
General Fund for Engineering Fees.
THAT, $92,452 is hereby transferred from the 2015 Construction Fund to the Capital Projects
Fund for the purpose of Comprehensive Planning and other planning needs.
THAT, said transfers are hereby effective and apply to the 2015 fiscal year.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Sale of Surplus Property Resolution #14499
Department: Compost
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Kosek
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes):
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Creekside's Compost Dept/Fund has a 2009 Kafka Truck unloading conveyor in it's fleet that is not currently utilized,
and has not been utilized for several years. In 2009, the unit was purchased from Kafka Mfg in Mosinee, WI for
$49,999. At the end of 2015, the unit will have a book value of $17,486. Staff is confident that the unit has a market
value of $25,000, or more, yet today due to it being in excellent condition with minimal hours. There are no plans or
intentions of replacing this unit with a same or similar unit.
It is staffs recommendation to sell the 2009 Kafka Conveyor and the proceeds from the sale be credited to the
Compost fund. Upon approval, staff will seek out the best means of selling the unit, sealed bid or auction, to capture
the most return possible based on the specialized use of this equipment.
Also, Creekside's Compost Dept/Fund has a 1990 Chev 1/2ton 4X4 w/ snow plow that is no longer utilized. This
vehicle has been offered to other departments for further use but due to its age and condition, there is no interest in
retaining it in the fleet. It has been determined that it should be excluded from the fleet.
It is staffs recommendation to sell the 1990 Chev 1/2ton 4X4 PU w/ plow at auction. The proceeds from sale will be
credited to the Compost Fund.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Resolution
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
RESOLUTION NO. 14499
RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION
SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Compost Department has accumulated surplus property; and
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides, pursuant to Section 91, for the sale at auction
of surplus City property; and
WHEREAS, the Compost Department has determined that it is in possession of surplus property
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
That the following surplus City property be sold at auction and proceeds from the sale be
credited to the appropriate account:
2009 KAFKA 48"X55' Truck Unloading Conveyor,
Serial # SC4855MN709E260DL
2. 1990 CHEV 1/2ton 4x4 P/U with straight blade plow, Unit #874
Vin # 2GCEK14K8L1144874
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 2015.
Gary Forcier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 14500
Resolution Supporting the Designation of a Portion of Trunk Highway 7 with McLeod
County as the Michael Alan Hogan Memorial Highway
WHEREAS, Patrol Officer Michael Alan Hogan was a 15 year veteran of the Hutchinson Police
Department who was shot and killed on December 15, 1989, while in the performance of his
duties responding to a shoplifting call at a local retail store; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Hutchinson Police Department and the people of Hutchinson
to honor the memory of Patrol Officer Hogan; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature may dedicate state highways for this cause, provided
there is no financial obligation on behalf of the State; and
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Transportation may adopt a design or erect a sign to mark or
memorialize a highway or bridge, pursuant to designation by the legislature, provided there are
available funds from non -state sources sufficient to pay all costs related to designing, erecting,
and maintaining the signs; and
WHEREAS, Hutchinson Police Services and the citizens of Hutchinson will be requesting the
2016 Minnesota Legislature to designate a to -be -determined portion of Trunk Highway 7 within
McLeod County as Michael Alan Hogan Memorial Highway.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hutchinson City Council supports the
designation of this segment of Trunk Highway 7 with McLeod County as the Michael Alan
Hogan Memorial Highway.
Adopted this 22nd day of December 2015
Gary Forcier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 14503
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, the Police Chief, City Engineer and Public Works Manager agree that the following areas
have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locates as points where traffic
control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1 of the Hutchinson City Code,
and;
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson shall coordinate placement of devicess with McLeod County and the
Minnesota Department of Transportation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes the following traffic control devices shall be installed and enforced:
1. Move "Vehicle Noise Laws Enforced" sign on Highway 15 N, north approximately 2,700
feet north of its current location.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 2015.
Gary Forcier
Mayor
ATTEST:
Matt Jaunich
City Administrator
eurrtNt Ip r&dfiftms
y , -Aw
j r '
j .•� I,i•
rd
je
ll
JAK
LAIM
i:l� �. • ,
Print Date: December 14, 2015
,, ,. N 1:9,045
%• A
VeklefI�� o Se w� ori Coes
a
#VPhitI!
n►•isc Laws fkdfiwteo) r
to ollatio n A
LOGI S
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Stephanie Nelson, Admin Technician
Date: December 15, 2015
Subject: License Renewals for 2016
The following establishments have applied for 2016 license renewals. The appropriate paperwork has been
submitted. Please approve the following licenses:
On -Sale Intoxicating Sunday Liquor License Wine/Strong Beer License
Applebee's Applebee's Country Kitchen
Buffalo Wild Wings Buffalo Wild Wings Tokyo Grill AA, Inc
Crow River Golf Club Crow River Golf Club
El Loro's
Landy Lodge Bar & Grill
Little Crow Bowling Lanes
Main Street Sports Bar
Sonora's
Zella's
Massage Services
Balance Center LLC
Catherine's Massage
Genesis Salon & Enso Spa, LLC
Hutchinson Therapeutic Massage Center
Main Massage LLC
Liz Lindemeier
Club On -Sale Intoxicating
Hutchinson Elks
V.F.W. Post 906
On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor
Hutchinson Huskies Baseball
Tara Tepley - The Paint Factory
Pawn Licenses
Security Coin & Pawn Shop Inc
Taxi Cab
Eric Labraaten (ACC Midwest Trans)
Duane Buske (Quality Transportation)
Hutch Cab Company, LLC
Garbage/Haulinn Licenses
Renville -Sibley Sanitation, LLC
Waste Management
West Central Sanitation, Inc
El Loro's
Hutchinson Elks Inc.
Landy Lodge Bar & Grill
Little Crow Bowling Lanes
Main Street Sports Bar
V.F.W. Post 906
Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor
Kwik Trip
Northern Tier Retail LLC (SA -West)
Viking Oil Corp (SA -East)
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Tobacco
Casey's
Coborn's Inc - Cash Wise Foods
Coborn's Inc - Holiday Station
Crow River Golf Club
Hutchinson Co -Op —Adams
Hutchinson Co -Op - Hwy 7
Hutchinson Outpost, Inc
Hutchinson Smokes4Less
Hutchinson Tobacco & Accessories Plus
Kwik Trip
Landy Lodge Bar & Grill
Kwik Trip
Main Street Sports Bar
Murphy Oil
Northern Tier Retail LLC (SA -West)
Viking Oil Corp (SA -East)
Walgreens
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Food Vendor
Taqueria Del Buen Pastor
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action
79 M-W
Agenda Item: Items for Water Tower (Golf Course Road) Reconditioning Project (L4/P16-04)
Department: PW/Eng
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Kent Exner
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Kent Exner
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Consent Agenda
Time Requested (Minutes): 0
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
City staff requests that the City Council approve the appropriate Resolutions to set
a Public Hearing for the above
referenced letting at their January 12th meeting.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of Resolutions
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost: $ 600,000.00
Total City Cost: $ 600,000.00 Funding Source: Water Fund
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
RESOLUTION NO. 14504
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 4/PROJECT NO. 16-04
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve:
Water Towner (Golf Course Road) Reconditioning: Exterior/interior coatings removal and
replacement, structural improvements, and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
THAT, the proposed improvement, called Letting No. 4/Project No. 16-04, be referred to the Engineer for
study and that that person is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council
in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible;
whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated
cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual
assessments for affected parcels.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Mayor: Gary Forcier
City Administrator: Matt Jaunich
HUTCHINSON PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Hutchinson City Center/111 Hassan St SE/Hutchinson MN 55350-2522/320-234-4209/FAX 320-234-4240
ENGINEERING REPORT & FEASIBILITY STUDY
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Kent Exner, DPW/City Engineer
DATE: December 22, 2015
SUBJECT: Letting No. 4/Project No. 16-04
I have studied the following proposed improvements and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it
be constructed:
L4/P16-04 Water Tower (Golf Course Road) Reconditioning: Exterior/interior coatings removal and replacement,
structural improvements, and appurtenances.
ESTIMATED COST TOTAL
Construction Cost $525,000
Engineering $60,000
Administration $15,000
ESTIMATED TOTAL $600,000
ESTIMATED FUNDING
TOTAL
Assessable Costs
$0
State Aid
$0
City - Bonding
$0
Cit - Water Funds
$600,000
City - Wastewater Funds
$0
Cit - Stormwater Funds
$0
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$600,000
RESOLUTION NO. 14505
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 4/PROJECT NO. 16-04
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted December22nd, 2015, a report has been
prepared by Kent Exner, Public Works Director/City Engineer with reference to the following proposed
improvements:
Water Towner (Golf Course Road) Reconditioning: Exterior/interior coatings removal and
replacement, structural improvements, and appurtenances; and
said report was received by the Council on December 22nd, 2015.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will considerthe improvement in accordance with the report at an estimated total cost
of the improvement of $600,000.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 12th day of January 2016, in
the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Mayor: Gary Forcier
City Administrator: Matt Jaunich
PUBLICATION NO. 8144
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 4
PROJECT NO. 16-04
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the
Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at 6:00 pm on the 12th day of January 2016,
to consider the making of an improvement of Letting No. 4/Project No. 16-04, an improvement of:
2015 Pavement Management Program: Golf Course Road NW from School Rd to North
High Dr (CSAH 12) and Shady Ridge Road NW from State Trunk Highway 7 to
approximately 350 LF north of 7th Ave NW; roadway reconstruction/rehabilitation by
construction of curb and gutter, draintile installation, bituminous/concrete surfacing,
stormwater/drainage, water distribution, sanitary sewer, street lighting, sidewalk,
landscaping, restoration and appurtenances;
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111.
The estimated City cost of said improvement is $600,000.00 and an Assessable cost of $0.00 for the total
estimated cost of $600,000.00. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the
hearing. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this
meeting.
Dated: 12/22/2015
Matt Jaunich, City Administrator
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR
AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 30TH, 2015 AND
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6TH, 2016.
CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATE FROM 12/22/2015 - 12/22/2015
Check Date
-------------------
12/22/2015
Check
--------------
188930
Vendor Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
ACE HARDWARE
Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SAFETY CHAIN
Amount
-------------------
2,475.18
12/22/2015
188931
VOID
0.00
12/22/2015
188932
ACTION FENCE, INC
INSTALL SWING GATE TO EXISTING FENCE AT
1,410.00
12/22/2015
188933
ACTIVE NETWORK INC
CLASS MAINT SUPPORT RENEWAL
1,736.43
12/22/2015
188934
AEM MECHANICAL SERVICES INC
INSTALL 2 1" COLD WATER DROPS IN GARAGE
2,330.40
12/22/2015
188935
ALLIED PRODUCTS
4X6 MN & POW NYLON FLAG
89.85
12/22/2015
188936
ALPHA WIRELESS
MAINT ON CONSOLE & FIXED TRANSMITTERS -DE
848.19
12/22/2015
188937
AMERICAN BOTTLING CO
MISC BEVERAGES
109.92
12/22/2015
188938
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN
MEMBERSHIP DUES 12/1/15-11/30/16 E.LEVIN
462.00
12/22/2015
188939
AMERIPRIDE SERVICES
TOWEL BAR WHITE, MOP
89.53
12/22/2015
188940
ANCHOR PROMOTIONS
HELMETS
489.79
12/22/2015
188941
ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & SERVICES
SUPER TALON ULTRA ANIMAL CATCHER KIT
1,708.50
12/22/2015
188942
ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER ON CROW RIVER
CAT & DOG BOARDING
731.00
12/22/2015
188943
ARCTIC GLACIER USA INC.
ICE
148.34
12/22/2015
188944
ARNESON DISTRIBUTING CO
DEC PURCH
608.35
12/22/2015
188945
ARROW TERMINAL LLC
ROUND LED WORKLAMP, CABLE TIE
312.70
12/22/2015
188946
ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
DEC PUCH
1,184.03
12/22/2015
188947
AUTO VALUE - GLENCOE
HY08-08RA, 06MP
344.74
12/22/2015
188948
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO
WTP COMPUTER HARDWARE & SOFTWARE UPGRADE
96,951.00
12/22/2015
188949
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO
REMOTE ACCESS ETHERNET MODEM
1,409.25
12/22/2015
188950
B & C PLUMBING & HEATING INC
INFRA -RED HEATER IN GARAGE FOR PARKS DEP
1,865.40
12/22/2015
188951
BARGEN INC
REPAIR CRACKS ON 5TH AVE SE BRIDGE & ADA
7,895.00
12/22/2015
188952
BARNUM GATE SERVICES INC
TRENCH LOOPS & INSTALL BOWED WIND TRUSS
1,974.49
12/22/2015
188953
BAYSINGER, KYLE
NOZELE FORWARD CLASS, EDEN PRAIRIE
291.12
12/22/2015
188954
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS
REPLACE EAST ARENA FLOORING
5,726.46
12/22/2015
188955
BELLBOY CORP
WING C/S, LEMON
1,334.32
12/22/2015
188956
BERNICK'S
MISC BEVERAGES
207.80
12/22/2015
188957
BOCK, CINDY
PANTS
31.99
12/22/2015
188958
BOLTON & MENK INC.
TAXIWAY & APRON
72,000.00
12/22/2015
188959
BP
LATE FEE & DELIVERY FEE
3.50
12/22/2015
188960
BRANDED SOLUTIONS
FITTED HPD HATS & CAPS
697.50
12/22/2015
188961
BRANDON TIRE CO
2 GOODYEAR WRANGLER
1,490.51
12/22/2015
188962
BREITKREUTZ, JERILYN
REIMB LICENSE PLATES
32.00
12/22/2015
188963
BUFFALO CREEK ENTERPRISES
BLOODY MARY SEASONING, MARGARITA SALT
49.56
12/22/2015
188964
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
HP Q2612ATONER
3,092.00
12/22/2015
188965
C & L DISTRIBUTING
DEC PURCH
31,127.02
12/22/2015
188966
CARPETSPLUS COLOR TILE
CTA 49
28.00
12/22/2015
188967
CARTER, RON
SAFETY GLASSES
146.98
12/22/2015
188968
CASH DRAWER #4
PETTY CASH RECONCILIATION
29.94
12/22/2015
188969
CENTRAL MCGOWAN
HIGH PRESSURE CYL
493.14
12/22/2015
188970
CMK SERVICES LLC
SNOW BLOWING CITY CENTER SI
320.00
12/22/2015
188971
COLD SPRING GRANITE CO
NS -3 COMP NICHE PLAQUE
223.00
12/22/2015
188972
COMDATA CORPORATION
FLOWERS- M. WILLERS
61.20
12/22/2015
188973
CREEKSIDE CASH DRAWER
BALANCE OF CASH DRAWER
24.39
12/22/2015
188974
CROW RIVER AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR
OIL CHANGE- 2004 FORD RANGER
268.91
12/22/2015
188975
CROW RIVER FLORAL & GIFTS
BLOOMING PLANT-J.BEFFERT
52.50
12/22/2015
188976
CROW RIVER WINERY
DEC PURCH
486.87
12/22/2015
188977
CULVER'S OF HUTCHINSON
MEAL FOR FF WORKING THE WILDLAND FIRE @
70.20
12/22/2015
188978
DANIELS SHARPSMART INC
CITY SHARPS CONTAINER DISPOSAL
160.77
12/22/2015
188979
DAVE'S PALLET SERVICE
#2 4 WAY PALLET
2,730.00
12/22/2015
188980
DEHN, PETER
SAFETY FOOTWEAR
170.00
12/22/2015
188981
DON STEVENS INC
MANITOWOC PRIMARY FILTER
306.88
12/22/2015
188982
DOWNHOLE WELL SERVICES
RVCVIDEO INSPECTION
1,500.00
12/22/2015
188983
DPC INDUSTRIES INC
SODIUM HYPO
1,186.99
12/22/2015
188984
DROP -N -GO SHIPPING INC
NORTHSHORE ANALYTICAL
79.65
12/22/2015
188985
E2 ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC
SWAP E -BALLAST IN FIXTURES
784.29
12/22/2015
188986
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
COCKROACH/RODENT PROGRAM
204.31
12/22/2015
188987
ELECTRO WATCHMAN
FIRE & SECURITY ALARM
1,510.08
12/22/2015
188988
ENERGY SALES INC
PRESSURE SWITCH FOR TWIN FIRE, MOTOR BLO
692.00
12/22/2015
188989
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT
UNI PRO BLACK
268.69
12/22/2015
188990
FASTENAL COMPANY
BIG BOOT, MSTCLNWIPE
199.64
12/22/2015
188991
FENSKE'S STUMP REMOVAL
STUMP REMOVAL
11,074.00
12/22/2015
1188992
IFIRST CHOICE FOOD & BEVERAGE SOLUTI
COL 1.5 FP CASE
228.00
CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATE FROM 12/22/2015 - 12/22/2015
Check Date
-------------------
12/22/2015
Check
--------------
188993
Vendor Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ALUM DISH FLUTED
Amount
-------------------
284.89
12/22/2015
188994
FREIGHT QUOTE.COM
BAGS OF SOIL
450.00
12/22/2015
188995
G & K SERVICES
TOWL,
270.89
12/22/2015
188996
GAVIN WINTERS TWISS THIEMANN & LONG
FLAT FEE AGREEMENT NOV
3,200.00
12/22/2015
188997
GEB ELECTRICAL INC
WEIGHT RM, MOVE SW, INSTALL RECEP, REMOV
234.40
12/22/2015
188998
GOPHER STATE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.
ANNUAL INSP & CERT 5# & 10# AMEREX
139.75
12/22/2015
188999
GRAINGER
REPLACEMNT SHOWER TESTER FUNNEL
381.78
12/22/2015
189000
GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INC
DEC PURCH
538.50
12/22/2015
189001
GRATKE, TIM
SAFETY FOOTWEAR REIMB
315.72
12/22/2015
189002
HACH COMPANY
SPADNS2 FLUORIDE RGT
936.38
12/22/2015
189003
HANSEN TRUCK SERVICE
REPAIR EXHAUST LEAK IN FLEX TUBE
2,597.75
12/22/2015
189004
HANSEN-TELECKY, ASHLEY
DAMAGE DEPOSIT
300.00
12/22/2015
189005
HANSON & VASEK CONSTRUCTION
SNOW HAULING
908.00
12/22/2015
189006
HART'S AUTO SUPPLY
CAPRICE FRT ROTOR
354.00
12/22/2015
189007
HAWK PERFORMANCE SPECIALITIES
IMPELLER W/W PUMP
157.00
12/22/2015
189008
HEATMOR INC.
FLEXIBLE SHAFT COUPLINGS
214.82
12/22/2015
189009
HI -LINE INC
SCOTCH
40.30
12/22/2015
189010
HILLYARD / HUTCHINSON
TOWEL ROLLS
847.73
12/22/2015
189011
HJERPE CONTRACTING
HAULSNOW & 2015-2016 RETAINING FEE
5,284.50
12/22/2015
189012
HOFF, RANDY
BLUE SILVER WREATH
32.00
12/22/2015
189013
HP INC
ELITEBOOK 800 G1 SFF
11,536.03
12/22/2015
189014
HUTCH CAFE
EDA MEETING
68.72
12/22/2015
189015
HUTCHFIELD SERVICES INC
COMMERCIAL JANITORIAL -DEC
1,512.28
12/22/2015
189016
HUTCHINSON CO-OP
FUELS & LUB
6,505.59
12/22/2015
189017
HUTCHINSON LEADER
ADVERTISING
6,733.30
12/22/2015
189018
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
NOV UTILITIES 10/30 - 11/30/15
94,305.30
12/22/2015
189019
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
WATER SERVICE 11/1-11/30/15
5,128.78
12/22/2015
189020
INTOXIMETERS INC
MOUTHPIECE ASIV OR ECIR
200.00
12/22/2015
189021
J & B PALLET
WRONG UNIT PRICE PAID ON ORIGINAL INVOIC
3,660.00
12/22/2015
189022
J & N SPECIALTY IMPORTS LLC
DEC PURCH
345.18
12/22/2015
189023
JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT
TEX-TROP LADIES CHOICE DARK NAVY
1,993.36
12/22/2015
189024
JACOBSEN, SEPTEMBER
PIANO WHEELS FELL OFF, REPLACE W/ DOLLY
199.99
12/22/2015
189025
JJ TAYLOR DIST OF MN
DEC PUCH
7,395.07
12/22/2015
189026
JLR GARAGE DOOR SERVICE
PUT CHAIN ON OPENER
370.00
12/22/2015
189027
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
DEC PURCH
26,981.88
12/22/2015
189028
JOHNSON, SCOTT
UB refund for account: 1-786-0265-0-00
66.93
12/22/2015
189029
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
SNOW HAULING 12/2/15, RETAINING FEE 444,
21,919.80
12/22/2015
189030
KDUZ KARP RADIO
MINN VIKINGS FOOTBALL
638.00
12/22/2015
189031
KERI'S CLEANING
CLEANING 12/1-12/15
1,875.00
12/22/2015
189032
KOMPTECH USA INC
SCREENER RENTAL
6,000.00
12/22/2015
189033
KRIS ENGINEERING
JOMA
2,575.68
12/22/2015
189034
L & P SUPPLY CO
CHAIN
61.88
12/22/2015
189035
LABAT, SHAWN
UB refund for account: 2-310-9640-5-01
42.82
12/22/2015
189036
LAKELAND BROADCASTING
ADVERTISING
470.10
12/22/2015
189037
LEXISNEXIS
NOVEMBER 2015 USER
151.41
12/22/2015
189038
LIESTMAN, CALYN
MILEAGE TO BANK
77.05
12/22/2015
189039
LITIN PAPER COMPANY
WASHER, SHOULDER BOLT
378.16
12/22/2015
189040
LOCHER BROTHERS INC
DEC PURCH
12,632.55
12/22/2015
189041
LYNDE & MCLEOD INC.
COMPOST SALES
132.27
12/22/2015
189042
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
RULE FOLDING SCALE, NYLON BAG TIES
96.50
12/22/2015
189043
M -R SIGN
WHITE BOARDER ON GREEN HIP
118.25
12/22/2015
189044
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
JETTER PARTS- SWIVEL, HANDLE
439.31
12/22/2015
189045
MANUFACTURING INFORMATION SYSTEMS I
USER LICENSES, BASIC OPERATIONS
1,485.00
12/22/2015
189046
MARKGRAFF-EGGE, DARLYN
DAMAGE DEPOSIT
152.00
12/22/2015
189047
MARTIN-MCALLISTER
PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT-SALAZAR.M
450.00
12/22/2015
189048
MATHESON TRI -GAS INC
ACETYLENE, HIGH PRESSURE
14.55
12/22/2015
189049
MAYTAG LAUNDRY & CAR WASH
LAUNDRY 11-6,11-10,11-21
235.05
12/22/2015
189050
MCILRATH, MIKAYLA
CLOTHING & FOOTWEAR REIMB
199.98
12/22/2015
189051
MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURER
2ND HALF PROP TAXES MID COUNTRY PARKING
958.72
12/22/2015
189052
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
SATISFACTION OF MORT A. JERGENS, EASEMEN
92.00
12/22/2015
189053
MCLEOD PUBLISHING INC
SUPPLEMENT
115.20
12/22/2015
189054
MCLEOD SOCIAL SERVICES
PRCE REIMB GIRLS BASKETBALL- NOT ABLE TO
70.00
12/22/2015
1189055
IMECA
2016 MECA MEMBERSHIP
50.00
CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATE FROM 12/22/2015 - 12/22/2015
Check Date
-------------------
12/22/2015
Check
--------------
189056
Vendor Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
MEDI CA
Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------
JAN MEDICAL INSURANCE
Amount
-------------------
119,216.34
12/22/2015
189057
MEEKER WASHED SAND & GRAVEL
WASHED SAND & DELIVERY
6,736.49
12/22/2015
189058
MENARDS HUTCHINSON
PWR STRP, RUST SPRAY
1,662.92
12/22/2015
189059
MES - MIDAM
WESCODYNE PLUS BOTTLES
33.18
12/22/2015
189060
MESSAGE MEDIA
MONTHLY ACCESS FEE DEC
30.00
12/22/2015
189061
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
PRODUCT RENEWAL- FERTILIZER & REGISTRATI
225.00
12/22/2015
189062
MILLNER HERITAGE VINEYARD & WINERY
DEC PURCH
712.80
12/22/2015
189063
MINI BIFF
RENT REG BLUE MINI BIFF
105.18
12/22/2015
189064
MINNESOTA DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
REGISTRATION -FERTILIZER PRODUCTS & AMEND
1,200.00
12/22/2015
189065
MINNESOTA SECRETARY OF STATE
RENEWAL NOTARY- M. STARKE
120.00
12/22/2015
189066
MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB
NITROGEN
1,388.40
12/22/2015
189067
MMC
REPLACE BEARING ASSEMBLY FOR BLDG 90 CIR
7,860.58
12/22/2015
189068
MN BCA-CJTE
PREDATORY OFFENDER- A.NORTROM 12/7/15
125.00
12/22/2015
189069
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY/CODE
ELV05917 ELEVATOR ANNUAL OPER
100.00
12/22/2015
189070
MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION
2016 FIRE OFFICER SCHOOLTICKETJ. STURG
200.00
12/22/2015
189071
MORAN USA LLC
UNIVERSAL BEER RINGS, SINGLE REEL
175.59
12/22/2015
189072
MPPOA
ANNUAL DUES- ASSN#8030
288.00
12/22/2015
189073
MUSCO LIGHTING
REPLACEMENT SPORTS LIGHTS FOR POLE A & B
22,408.00
12/22/2015
189074
MWOA
TWO YEAR MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- R. CZECH
75.00
12/22/2015
189075
NARTEC INC.
NARTEC MEHT AMPULES
85.00
12/22/2015
189076
NATIONAL APPRAISAL GUIDES
ACCT#384895 RENEWAL ORDER #1595148
186.00
12/22/2015
189077
NERO ENGINEERING
AUTOCAD DRAFTING SERVICE- WELL #4
693.35
12/22/2015
189078
NEW FRANCE WINE
DEC PURCH
792.00
12/22/2015
189079
NEWCOMB, LUCY
MUSIC ADAPTIVE REC 12/1/15
100.00
12/22/2015
189080
NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC
PUG10 ECONOMY GRAY POLYURETHANE PALM
27.00
12/22/2015
189081
NORTH CENTRAL LABORATORIES
NALGENE 10 -LITER
71.81
12/22/2015
189082
NORTHERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS
INK, BOWL, PLATE
690.45
12/22/2015
189083
NORTHERN GREEN EXPO
ANNUAL EXPO
180.00
12/22/2015
189084
NORTHERN SAFETY & INDUSTRIAL
THERMO GLV
235.50
12/22/2015
189085
NU -TELECOM
DEC SERVICES
4,275.13
12/22/2015
189086
O'REILLY AUTO PARTS
RED PSA DISC
145.31
12/22/2015
189087
OFFICE DEPOT
HOLDER LEAFLET
244.35
12/22/2015
189088
PARKS, RECREATION & COMM ED
ADVERTISING- 2016 WINTER BROCHURE
275.00
12/22/2015
189089
PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
DEC PURCH
2,635.66
12/22/2015
189090
PEAT INC.
CY SPHAGNUM FINE
6,556.50
12/22/2015
189091
PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING
SURVEY & CERT 5TH AVE NE BLOCK 15 & 16
690.00
12/22/2015
189092
PHB CONSULTING, CO
ON SITE CONSULTATION
728.00
12/22/2015
189093
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
DEC PURCH
20,817.89
12/22/2015
189094
PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL
ANNUAL BILL DEC -AUG
165.25
12/22/2015
189095
POSTMASTER
FIRST CLASS PRESORT
1,925.00
12/22/2015
189096
PRO AUTO MN INC.
CHECK & REPAIR BRAKE LINE LEAK AMBULANCE
621.50
12/22/2015
189097
PTM DOCUMENT SYSTEMS
1099 FORMS
42.30
12/22/2015
189098
QUADE ELECTRIC
REPLACE PARTS AT THE NATIONAL GUARD
58.95
12/22/2015
189099
QUILL CORP
BP CNETER PULL TOWEL
354.88
12/22/2015
189100
RDO EQUIPMENT CO.
4WD LOADER
1,249.42
12/22/2015
189101
RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE
MIRROR- LADDER 1
340.61
12/22/2015
189102
REDLINE SYSTEMS INC.
BOBCAT BLADES RE -SIT W/STEEL
150.00
12/22/2015
189103
REFLECTIVE APPAREL FACTORY INC
ANSI WATER RESISTANT
695.12
12/22/2015
189104
REINER ENTERPRISES INC
FLATBED TRUCKING 11/13/15
26,147.51
12/22/2015
189105
RIDGEWATER COLLEGE
CPR COURSE 10/13 & 10/27
1,560.00
12/22/2015
189106
RKO ENTERPRISES
ANODIZED 6 WHEELER
80.00
12/22/2015
189107
ROYAL TIRE
FS TRANS A/T OWL LRE
549.56
12/22/2015
189108
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
TRAILER BALL, WIPER BLADE,ENGINE OIL
802.71
12/22/2015
189109
SCARCELY LTD
CITY REVOLVING PROG- N.KRUGER 466 BLUFF
450.00
12/22/2015
189110
SCHUETTE, DONOVAN
PANTS
151.95
12/22/2015
189111
SEH
HUTCH 2015 ANTENNA PROJECT
7,777.16
12/22/2015
189112
SEPPELT, MILES
BUILDINGS 2030 WORKSHOP SCIENCE MUSEUM
95.58
12/22/2015
189113
SHOPKO STORES OPERATING CO, LLC
WRLSS OPTCL, LED MICRO CABLE, CASE
73.43
12/22/2015
189114
SHRED -IT USA INC
ON-SITE DEC
95.25
12/22/2015
189115
SCRENSEN'S SALES & RENTALS
CORE DRILL
84.00
12/22/2015
189116
SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF MN
DEC PURCH
9,779.80
12/22/2015
189117
SPARTAN STAFFING
WK ENDING 11/22/15
6,702.87
12/22/2015
1189118
ISPS COMMERCE INC
WEBFORMS
178.00
CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CHECK DATE FROM 12/22/2015 - 12/22/2015
Check Date
-------------------
12/22/2015
Check
--------------
189119
Vendor Name
--------------------------------------------------------------
STANDARD PRINTING
Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTARY DIE- C.LIESTMAN
Amount
-------------------
34.95
12/22/2015
189120
STANLEY ACCESS TECH LLC
TRAVEL, LABOR, SAFETY BEAM
389.10
12/22/2015
189121
STAPLES ADVANTAGE
2016 CAL, PADS
96.51
12/22/2015
189122
STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY
OPERATING SUPPLIES
496.26
12/22/2015
189123
STREICH TRUCKING
PLAISTED TO CREEKSIDE 11/30-12/04/15
4,780.00
12/22/2015
189124
STUART NELSON BUILDERS
REPLACE 2 BROKEN HEADS BY DRIVEWAY FROM
132.37
12/22/2015
189125
SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION
FIRE SPRINKLER STAND PIPE IN FIRE TRAINI
2,150.00
12/22/2015
189126
TASER INTERNATIONAL
CARTRIDGE BATTERY PACK
1,937.75
12/22/2015
189127
THOMSON REUTERS-WEST
WEST INFORMATION CHARGES
1,755.50
12/22/2015
189128
TITAN MACHINERY
CHANGE FRONT AXLE OIL
630.08
12/22/2015
189129
TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE
TRAILER TUBE
6.80
12/22/2015
189130
TRI COUNTY WATER
RENTAL WATER COOLER
190.75
12/22/2015
189131
TRIMBO, DAVID
SHAMPOO CARPETS PD DEPT
395.00
12/22/2015
189132
TWO WAY COMMUNICATIONS INC
NEW PAGER, FIXED VOLUME ALERT "OFF" TOM
756.51
12/22/2015
189133
U.S. WATER SERVICES
LIQUID POLYMER
4,128.46
12/22/2015
189134
UNITED PACKAGING & DESIGN
40X48X.22 SLIP
6,210.41
12/22/2015
189135
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA
JAN LIFE & LTD INSURANCE
2,036.22
12/22/2015
189136
USA BLUE BOOK
BLAZE POWDER GLOVES
443.03
12/22/2015
189137
VERIZON WIRELESS
OCT24-NOV23'15 USAGE
3,089.17
12/22/2015
189138
VIKING BEER
DEC PURCH
10,004.51
12/22/2015
189139
VIKING COCA COLA
MISC BEVERAGES
1,054.80
12/22/2015
189140
VINOCOPIA INC
DEC PURCH
1,266.16
12/22/2015
189141
VIVID IMAGE
PROJECT PROGRESS PAYMENT
2,220.00
12/22/2015
189142
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN
BIO REACTOR LIQUIDS
5,279.30
12/22/2015
189143
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
NEW RESIDENT VISITS
60.00
12/22/2015
189144
WELLS FARGO
MISC PURCH
1,398.86
12/22/2015
189145
WENDLANDT TREE SERVICE INC.
40X48 4 WAY PALLET #2
1,680.00
12/22/2015
189146
WEST CENTRAL SANITATION INC.
1400 ADAMS 8 YD
291.50
12/22/2015
189147
WINE COMPANY, THE
DEC PURCH
926.85
12/22/2015
189148
WINE MERCHANTS INC
NOV PURCH
793.13
12/22/2015
189149
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
DEC PURCH
20,956.69
12/22/2015
189150
WM MUELLER & SONS
SIZE A BLACKT
117.16
12/22/2015
189151
WONDERLIC
ANNUAL SYSTEM ACCESS FEE
250.00
12/22/2015
189152
WSB & ASSOC
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
3,441.00
12/22/2015
189153
ZEP SALES AND SERVICE
ZEP METER MIST
119.59
12/22/2015
189154
ZWILLING, TROY
MWOA MEETING
66.00
Grand Total
I
1
842,287.10
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Codification of the Hutchinson City Code
Department: Legal
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Marc Sebora
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Marc Sebora
Reviewed by Staff ✓❑
Unfinished Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 0
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
The City periodically has our code of ordinances reviewed and recodified so that our code is up to date and recent
ordinance amendments or adoptions are included in our code book.
During the course of this year, staff has been working with the City's ordinance codifier, American Legal Publishing,
on codifying the City's current city code. The ordinance included in the packet is proposed to adopt all of the
ordinance updates and codify the set of ordinances. The last recodification of our ordinances occurred in 2004.
No major changes have been made to the ordinances. Overall, references to state law or publications have been
removed or updated as applicable. Specific updates to note include changing the term "non-intoxicating malt liquor"
to "3.2% malt liquor"; mirroring policy language pertaining to delinquent accounts; removing reference to appealing to
the City Building Code Board of Appeals, which we have not had for many years, in cases of challenging
interpretations of the State Building Code - all appeals will now go to the State; removing reference to the "Housing
Advisory and Appeals Board" and replacing with "Property Maintenance Code Board of Appeals" - this is to comply
with the International Property Maintenance Code that the City has already adopted; removed reference to
Administrative Offenses since that program was repealed several years ago; updated snowmobile equipment
requirements since the former regulations were from 1970; no longer require photograph being submitted with
transient merchant/peddler application, but rather at time license is issued - this is to avoid allegations of
discrimination; no tattooing of a minor regardless of whether parental consent is given in compliance with state law;
and pawnbrokers must now keep records for seven years to comply with federal laws.
Please note that because the codification process began the end of 2014, ordinances that were adopted after October
28, 2014, are not included in this codification. Those ordinances will be included in the first supplement to the code
that will be completed in the first quarter of 2016.
No changes have been made to the ordinance since the first reading held at the last City Council meeting.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 15-748 - Approving the Codification of the Hutchinson City Code
Fiscal Impact: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
FTE Impact: 0.00 Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
Ordinance No. 15-0748
An Ordinance Enacting a Code of Ordinances for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
Amending, Restating, Revising, Updating, Codifying and Compiling Certain Ordinances of
the City Dealing With the Subjects Embraced in the Code of Ordinances, and Providing
Penalties for the Violation of the Code of Ordinances.
WHEREAS Minnesota Statutes Sections 415.02 and 415.021 authorize the city to cause its
ordinances to be codified and printed in a book,
NOW THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereby ordains:
Section 1. The general ordinances of the City as amended, restated, revised, updated, codified
and compiled in book form, including penalties for the violations of various provisions thereof,
are herby adopted and shall constitute the "Code of Ordinances of the City of Hutchinson". This
Code of Ordinances also adopts by reference certain statutes and administrative rules of the State
of Minnesota as named in the Code of Ordinances.
Section 2. The Code of Ordinances as adopted in Section 1 shall consist of the following titles:
I.
General Provisions
III.
Administration
V.
Public Works
VII.
Traffic Code
IX.
General Regulations
XI.
Business Regulations
XIII.
General Offenses
XV.
Land Usage
Section 3. All prior ordinances, pertaining to the subjects treated in the Code of Ordinances,
shall be deemed repealed from and after the effective date of this ordinance, except as they are
included and re -ordained in whole or in part in the proposed Code of Ordinances; provided, this
repeal shall not affect any offense committed or penalty incurred or any right established prior to
the effective date of this ordinance, nor shall this repeal affect the provisions of ordinances
levying taxes, appropriating money, annexing or detaching territory, establishing franchises, or
granting special rights to certain persons, authorizing public improvements, authorizing the
issuance of bonds or borrowing of money, authorizing the purchase or sale of real or personal
property, granting or accepting easements, plat or dedication of land to public use, vacating or
setting the boundaries of streets or other public places; nor shall this repeal affect any other
ordinance of a temporary or special nature or pertaining to subjects not contained in or covered
by the Code of Ordinances. All fees established in prior ordinances codified in this Code shall
remain in effect unless amended in this code or until an ordinance or resolution adopting a fee
schedule is adopted or amended.
Section 4. This ordinance adopting the Code of Ordinances shall be a sufficient publication of
any ordinance included in it and not previously published in the city's official newspaper. The
Clerk of the City shall cause a substantial quantity of the Code of Ordinances to be printed for
general distribution to the public at actual cost and shall furnish a copy of the Code of
Ordinances to the local library. The official copy of this Code of Ordinances shall be marked
and kept in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 5. The Code of Ordinances is declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City
and shall be received in evidence as provided by Minnesota Statutes by the Courts of the State of
Minnesota.
Section 6. This ordinance adopting the Code of Ordinances, and the Code of Ordinances itself,
shall take effect upon publication of this ordinance in the City's official newspaper.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 2015.
Gary T. Forcier, Mayor
Attest:
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Resolution No. 14498 - 2016 City Compensation Plan/Classification Table
Department: Administration
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Brenda Ewing
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Brenda Ewing
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Attached is Resolution No. 14498 the proposed 2016 Compensation Plan for the City of Hutchinson. Please note
that this policy, proposed to be effective on January 1, 2016, will replace the current 2015 Compensation Plan.
The pay grid included in the policy reflects the 2.0% annual market adjustment that has been recommended and
incorporated as part of the 2016 budgeting process. Please note that this market increase adjusts the pay grid but
does not result in comprehensive across the board market increases for all regular employees. Market increases are
only proposed for those employees whose pay would fall below the minimum of the grid when the adjustment is
applied on January 1, as is indicated in Section I of the plan. This affects six (6) regular full time employees and ten
(10) regular part time employees, and one (1) temporary part time employee.
The Plan also includes a new section, Section G - Promotion, Position Reclassification, and Demotion Pay Rate
Adjustment. This language is added to provide a consistent process to determine pay rate changes when these
employment related actions occur.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Consideration and approval of Resolution No. 14498 City of Hutchinson 2016 Compensation Plan and Adoption of the
Position Classification Table and Pay Grid
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source: General Fund and Enterprise Fund Budgets
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: Yes
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
RESOLUTION NO. 14498
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
2016 COMPENSATION PLAN
RESOLUTION ADOPTING POSITION CLASSIFICATION
ASSIGNMENT TABLE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2016
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the existing classification of positions
for the City of Hutchinson and the current economic conditions,
BE IT RESOLVED, that a Position Classification Plan is hereby adopted. All positions
covered by this Resolution shall be grouped in grades having a definite range of difficulty
and responsibility. For each position there shall be a title; and there shall be shown
examples of work which are illustrative of duties of positions, as well as requirements as to
knowledge, abilities and skills necessary for performance of the work; and a statement of
experience and training desirable for recruitment into a position.
A. Plan Objectives
• To establish and maintain a compensation plan that enables the City of Hutchinson to
be highly competitive within our defined market.
• To lead or exceed the market in attracting and retaining qualified, reliable and motivated
employees who are committed to quality and excellence for those we serve.
• To ensure, subject to the financial condition of the City, that employees receive fair and
equitable compensation in relation to their individual contributions to the City's success.
• To follow the principles of pay equity in establishing and maintaining pay relationships
among positions based on the categories of the Stanton Point Factor System.
• To ensure program flexibility necessary to meet changing economic, competitive,
technological, and regulatory conditions encountered by the City.
• To balance compensation and benefit needs with available resources.
B. Plan Structure
The compensation plan specifies salary range minimums and maximums. The intent of
each salary grade is to fall within 80% and 115% of identified market for positions within the
grade. (See Attachment B)
Each numbered pay grade in the basic table consists of the following:
1. Salary Minimum: The lowest amount paid to an employee in a specific job
grade or class. No employee will receive less than the minimum rate. (80% of
market)
2. Salary Mid -point: The middle of the salary range. (97.5% of market)
3. Market Rate: The market rate represents the competitive rate for an employee who
is fully functional within their current position. (100%)
4. Salary Maximum: The difference between the salary market rate and the salary
maximum represents merit pay for employee performance above that expected of a
particularjob. No employee will be paid above the maximum of the salary range.
(115% of market).
C. Open Salary Range
The City shall adopt an Open Salary Range compensation plan that will allow for maximum
flexibility and in -range salary administration since there are not defined or pre -calculated
"steps". Employee movement within the pay grade range to which their position is assigned
is based solely on performance. The open salary range concept rewards good and
exceptional performers and advances employees to the market rate more quickly. (See item
I. [4])
D. Position Classification Assignment
The assignment table shall assign all of the various positions in the Position Classification
Plan to the appropriate pay grade (See Attachment A).
The City Administrator and Human Resources Director may jointly approve a
reclassification of a position provided the reclassification does not exceed two grades
upward or two grades downward from the current pay grade. To initiate consideration of
this type of reclassification, the department director shall submit in writing the specific
reasons for the reclassification.
Any changes to the classification of a position of more than two pay grades shall be
approved by the City Council. Requests for reclassification are normally brought before the
Council with the annual budget process, and at other times of the year, as needed. To
initiate such a reclassification request, the department director shall submit a written request
for consideration to the City Administrator and the Human Resources Director. The request
shall include a description of significant or considerable changes to the position that warrant
a reclassification. The City Administrator and Human Resources Director will determine if
the reclassification request is to be forwarded to the City Council for consideration.
E. Allocation Of New Positions
When a new position is created for which no appropriate description exists or when the
duties of an existing position are sufficiently changed so that no appropriate description
exists, the City Council, after recommendation of the Human Resources Director, shall
cause an appropriate job description -specification to be written for said position.
F. Pay Grades
1. Exempt Employees
Each position is assigned a pay grade. The normal beginning rate for a new
employee will be the minimum rate. After satisfactory completion of twelve months
probation, an increase may be granted as warranted by the annual performance
appraisal. Thereafter, consideration for increases may be given annually on a
standardized date established by the City. The City Administrator reserves the
discretion to adjust individual rates within the assigned pay grades as required. The
Council will determine any pay increase for the City Administrator.
2. Non -Exempt Employees
Each position is assigned a pay grade. The normal beginning rate for a new
employee will be the minimum rate. After satisfactory completion of twelve months
probation, an increase may be granted as warranted by the annual performance
appraisal. Thereafter, consideration for increases may be given annually on a
standardized date established by the City. The City Administrator reserves the
discretion to adjust individual rates within the assigned pay grades as required.
3. Police Patrol Positions
The position of full time police patrol officer is assigned to Grade 5 on the pay plan.
Temporary assignments will be made from these positions as needed for the
investigative function for the department. With said assignment, there will be an
additional $200.00 per month premium on top of the employee's patrol officer pay
grid assignment.
4. Part -Time Liquor Store Clerk, Part -Time Custodial and Part -Time Compost Site
Monitor Positions
The part-time positions of liquor store clerk, custodian, and compost site monitor
have been placed in separate pay plans that recognize the specific industry labor
markets in which they work.
The City Administrator and the Human Resources Director, as directed by the
Administrator, shall maintain the discretion to hire at any point within the range based on the
qualifications, experience, market conditions or other relevant factors, to secure the best
candidate for the position.
G. Promotion, Position Reclassification, and Demotion Pay Rate Adjustment
1. When an employee is promoted or the position to which they are appointed is
reclassified upward, the employee's pay rate will be adjusted as follows:
a. If the promotion or reclassification results in a one grade adjustment upward, the
employee shall be compensated within the higher salary range at a rate that is
equal to the compa ratio of the employee's pay rate in their current range.
b. If the promotion or reclassification results in more than a one grade adjustment
upward, the employee's pay rate will be adjusted by using one of the following
methods:
To at least the minimum of the higher salary range for classified staff
positions; or
If the employee's current pay rate is at or above the minimum of the
promotional or reclassified position, the pay rate may be increased to a level
within the salary range or budgeted pay rate amount that is equitable, based
on the employee's related experience, qualifications and the pay rates of the
other employees in the same position; or, the appropriate pay rate based on
market conditions and competition. Generally, this pay rate increase ranges
from 5% to 10%; or,
iii. To a level within the higher salary range that is equal to the compa ratio of the
employee's pay rate in the current range if the increase does not exceed
10%.
2. When an employee is demoted or the position to which they are appointed is
reclassified downward, the employee's salary will be adjusted as follows:
a. If the employee's current pay rate is within the salary range of the resulting
position, the pay rate will remain unchanged.
b. If the employee's current pay rate is above the maximum of the salary range, the
current pay rate may be maintained, but frozen until the pay rate falls within the
salary range as a result of adjustments to the pay grid, or may be lowered to the
maximum pay rate of the lower pay grade.
When making salary adjustment decisions, the following may be considered:
• market condition trends, such as inflation and the current salary rates for the external
market
• employee performance to reward increased productivity and performance
improvements
• available resources, salary maximums, and other restrictions to ensure that the
increase is allowable and that funds exist to cover it
The City Administrator will normally discuss the proposed pay adjustment with the
director/department head and the Human Resources Director. The City Administrator
must approve any pay rate adjustment due to promotion, reclassification or demotion
and may vary from this policy and approve a different pay rate adjustment, per his/her
discretion.
Definitions
Promotion - A promotion is the appointment of a current, active regular employee to a
position in a higher salary range than the one to which the employee is presently
assigned. Most promotions will occur as a result of a job posting or a departmental
reorganization. A promotion is also advancement to a position that requires performing
accountabilities of increased complexity or responsibility.
Demotion - A demotion is the appointment of a current, active regular employee to a
position in a lower salary range than the one to which the employee is presently
assigned. Most demotions will occur as a result of a departmental reorganization or
disciplinary action. A demotion is also an appointment to a position that requires
performing accountabilities of decreased complexity or responsibility.
Reclassification — A reclassification is the placement of a current position in a higher or
lower salary grade because the position evaluation criteria have changed and now meet
the requirements of a higher or lower pay grade.
H. Apprenticeship Program
The City has implemented an apprenticeship program for those Water and Wastewater
Department positions subject to identified employee development including required
licensures/demonstrated skills, experience /longevity, and maturation in a position that
directly affect the department's ability to deliver municipal services.
I. Performance Evaluations
1. For all regular full time and part time employees, a performance appraisal or
evaluation will be made on, at minimum, an annual basis and per city policy No.
3.08. An evaluation made by the employee's supervisor shall be submitted in writing
to the employee and to the City Administrator/Human Resources Director. All
evaluations will be forwarded to Human Resources for filing in the employee files.
2. Evaluations shall be based upon the performance of the individual in the position
measured against established job performance criteria. Such criteria may include
level of knowledge, skills, ability, and quality of work, personal work traits,
compliance with established City or departmental rules and regulations or any other
criteria that is indicative of performance.
3. The performance appraisal process is the application of performance standards to
past performance. In appraising an employee, these are the basic levels of
performance:
Outstanding - Performance is exceptional in all areas and is recognizable as being
far superior to others.
Exceeds Job Requirements - Results clearly exceed most positions requirements.
Performance is of high quality and is achieved on a consistent basis.
Meets Job Requirements - Competent and dependable level of performance.
Meets performance standards of the job.
Needs Improvement - Performance is deficient in certain area(s). Improvement is
necessary.
Unsatisfactory - Results are generally unacceptable and require immediate
improvement.
4. Results
The results of the employee's evaluation will normally have the following effect on
his/her salary per the following Merit Increase Guide:
Merit Increase Guide for Open Salary Ranges
Achievement Level
*Compa-ratio refers to the location of the individual in the range relative to the market.
Merit/performance increases for eligible regular full time and regular part time
employees will be effective on the first date of the first full pay period commencing
0 to
1.1 to
2.0 to
2.76 to
3.51 to
4.26 to
Compa-Ratio*
1.0
1.99
2.75
3.5
4.25
5.0
80.0-84.9
0%
0%
4%
5%
6%
7%
85.0-89.9
0%
0%
4%
5%
6%
7%
90.0-94.9
0%
0%
3%
4%
5%
6%
95.0-99.9
0%
0%
2%
3%
4%
5%
100.0
— 104.9
0%
0%
0%
2%
3%
4%
105.0
— 109.9
0%
0%
0%
1 %
2%
3%
110.0
— 115.0
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
3%
*Compa-ratio refers to the location of the individual in the range relative to the market.
Merit/performance increases for eligible regular full time and regular part time
employees will be effective on the first date of the first full pay period commencing
on or after March 1, except for newly hired employees. For 2016, the effective date
is Sunday, March 13, 2016. New employees are eligible for consideration for a
merit/performance increase after one year of continuous employment, generally, the
first year anniversary date. In subsequent years, eligible employees will be eligible
for consideration for the merit/performance increase as specified previously and at
the discretion of the department director. Application of merit/performance increases
for employees appointed to the position of full time police patrol officer is subject to
collective bargaining.
5. Market Conditions
Notwithstanding any language to the contrary, the City Council retains the right to
deviate from the pay plan when, in the sole judgment of the City Council, market
conditions or other circumstances dictate such a decision.
The City Administrator and Human Resources Director maintain final approval responsibility
for salary increases.
J. Annual Market Adjustment Consideration
As part of the budget preparation process, an annual market adjustment, expressed as a
percentage increase, is recommended to the City Council for review and consideration for
approval.
In determining a recommendation for an annual market adjustment, at least the following
information shall be considered:
1. U.S., Midwest, and Minneapolis/St. Paul consumer price index changes (CPIU & CPIW)
2. Social Security calculation of cost of living increase
3. Unemployment rate
4. Employee turnover rate
5. Area wage survey
6. Legislative growth factor constraints
An approved market adjustment is applied only to the City Pay Grid, and no individual
market increases will be granted in 2016. If an adjustment to the pay grid results in a regular
employee's wages being below the minimum rate of the grid, the wages for the affected
employee(s) will be increased to the newly established minimum rate effective January 1St
K. Modification of the Plan
The City Council reserves the right to modify any or all of the components or to vary from
any of the components of the Compensation Plan at its discretion and at any time.
L. Review of the Plan
As often as necessary to assure continued correct classification, the Position Classification
Plan shall be reviewed by the Human Resources Director and necessary adjustments
recommended to the City Council. It is recommended that a comprehensive review be
completed at least every three years.
M. Filing of the Plan
Upon adoption of the Resolution, a copy of the Position Classification Plan approved by the
City Council shall be placed on file with the City Administrator. The plan so filed and
subsequently adjusted by the Council shall be the Position Classification Plan of the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
That the following table is hereby adopted as the City Position Classification Assignment
Table, to be reviewed from time to time, assigning the various positions in the Position
Classification Plan to the appropriate pay grades in the table. Pay grades for regular part
time (PT) positions are assigned according to job responsibilities at the discretion of the City
Administrator and Human Resources Director.
Aynda T.*m 01
City of Hutchinson New Nisilk.%
Position Classification Table
January 2016
Grade
Position Title
Grade
Position Title
1
PT Office Specialist (Event Center)
5
Executive Assistant/Paralegal
PT Compost Scale Operator
Information Technology Specialist
PT Custodian
Parks Maintenance Specialist
PT PRCE Receptionist
Police Officer (FT/PT)
Maintenance Lead Operator/Supervisor
2
Compost Laborer
Sales & Marketing Specialist
Permit Technician
Senior Engineering Specialist
PT Human Resources Administrative Technician
Server/Network Technician
PT Liquor Sales Clerk
PT Licensing Clerk
6
Compost Coordinator
PT Recreation Facility Maintenance Technician
Recreation Services Coordinator
3
Administrative Secretary (Engineering)
7
Operations & Maintenance Supervisor
Administrative Secretary (Public Works)
Project/Environmental/Regulatory Manager
Compost Equipment Operator
Senior Accountant
General Maintenance Worker (Event Center)
General Maintenance Worker (HATS)
8
Building Official
Heavy Equipment Operator
Facilities Supervisor
Hospital Security Guard (FT/PT)
Motor Vehicle Deputy Registrar
Parks Maintenance Equipment Operator
Parks Supervisor
Plant Equipment Mechanic I
Police Sergeant
Police Records Specialist
Recreation Facilities Operations Manager
Police Supplemental Services Specialist
Water Supervisor
Water Maintenance Technician
Wastewater Supervisor
Senior Liquor Sales Clerk
Wastewater Services Operator
10
Police Lieutenant
Water/Wastewater Office/Laboratory Specialist
Fire Chief
Senior Accounting Specialist
Utility Billing Specialist
11
Public Works Manager
4
Arborist
12
Compost Manager
Building Inspector
Economic Development Director
Compost Operations Specialist
Finance Director
Emergency Dispatcher (FT/PT)
Human Resources Director
Engineering Specialist
IT Director
Equipment Mechanic
Liquor Sales Manager
Lab Technician/WW Operator
Planning Director
Payroll/Benefits Specialist
PlanniRg and Building SpeGialis
14
Police Chief/Emergency Management Director
Police Investigations Specialist
PRCE Director
Plant Equipment Mechanic II
Senior Public Works Maintenance Specialist
16
City Attorney
Water Plant Operator
Public Works Director/City Engineer
5
Event Center Coordinator
19
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
Position Classification Table
January 2016
Grade
Position Title
Grade
Position Title
1
PT Office Specialist (Event Center)
5
Information Technology Specialist
PT Compost Scale Operator
Parks Maintenance Specialist
PT Custodian
Police Officer (FT/PT)
PT PRCE Receptionist
Maintenance Lead Operator/Supervisor
Sales & Marketing Specialist
2
Compost Laborer
Senior Engineering Specialist
Permit Technician
Server/Network Technician
PT Human Resources Administrative Technician
PT Liquor Sales Clerk
6
Compost Coordinator
PT Licensing Clerk
Recreation Services Coordinator
PT Recreation Facility Maintenance Technician
7
Operations & Maintenance Supervisor
3
Administrative Secretary (Engineering)
Project/Environmental/Regulatory Manager
Administrative Secretary (Public Works)
Senior Accountant
Compost Equipment Operator
General Maintenance Worker (Event Center)
8
Building Official
General Maintenance Worker (HATS)
Facilities Supervisor
Heavy Equipment Operator
Motor Vehicle Deputy Registrar
Hospital Security Guard (FT/PT)
Parks Supervisor
Parks Maintenance Equipment Operator
Police Sergeant
Plant Equipment Mechanic I
Recreation Facilities Operations Manager
Police Records Specialist
Water Supervisor
Police Supplemental Services Specialist
Wastewater Supervisor
Water Maintenance Technician
Senior Liquor Sales Clerk
10
Police Lieutenant
Wastewater Services Operator
Fire Chief
Water/Wastewater Office/Laboratory Specialist
Senior Accounting Specialist
11
Public Works Manager
Utility Billing Specialist
12
Compost Manager
4
Arborist
Economic Development Director
Compost Operations Specialist
Finance Director
Emergency Dispatcher (FT/PT)
Human Resources Director
Engineering Specialist
IT Director
Equipment Mechanic
Liquor Sales Manager
Lab Technician/WW Operator
Planning Director
Payroll/Benefits Specialist
Planning and Building Specialist
14
Police Chief/Emergency Management Director
Police Investigations Specialist
PRCE Director
Plant Equipment Mechanic II
Senior Public Works Maintenance Specialist
16
City Attorney
Water Plant Operator
Public Works Director/City Engineer
5
Event Center Coordinator
19
City Administrator
Executive Assistant/Paralegal
Attachment A
City of Hutchinson
2016 Compensation Plan - Pay Grid (2% increase)
Mid -Pt. Mid -Pt. Market Market
Grade 80% 80% 97.5% 97.5% 100% 100%
115% 115%
19
$7,887
$45.504
$9,613
$55.458
$9,859
$56.880
$11,338
$65.412
18
$7,600
$43.847
$9,263
$53.439
$9,500
$54.809
$10,925
$63.030
17
$7,313
$42.190
$8,912
$51.419
$9,141
$52.738
$10,512
$60.648
16
$7,024
$40.524
$8,561
$49.388
$8,780
$50.655
$10,097
$58.253
15
$6,738
$38.872
$8,211
$47.375
$8,422
$48.589
$9,685
$55.878
14
$6,450
$37.210
$7,860
$45.350
$8,062
$46.512
$9,271
$53.489
13
$6,162
$35.548
$7,509
$43.325
$7,702
$44.435
$8,857
$51.101
12
$5,874
$33.891
$7,159
$41.305
$7,343
$42.364
$8,444
$48.719
11
$5,585
$32.221
$6,806
$39.269
$6,981
$40.276
$8,028
$46.317
10
$5,298
$30.564
$6,456
$37.249
$6,622
$38.205
$7,615
$43.935
9
$5,010
$28.902
$6,105
$35.224
$6,262
$36.128
$7,201
$41.547
8
$4,722
$27.241
$5,754
$33.199
$5,902
$34.051
$6,787
$39.158
7
$4,434
$25.584
$5,404
$31.180
$5,543
$31.979
$6,374
$36.776
6
$4,148
$23.931
$5,055
$29.166
$5,185
$29.914
$5,963
$34.401
5
$3,858
$22.256
$4,701
$27.124
$4,822
$27.820
$5,545
$31.993
4
$3,573
$20.613
$4,354
$25.122
$4,466
$25.766
$5,136
$29.631
3
$3,282
$18.937
$4,000
$23.080
$4,103
$23.672
$4,718
$27.222
2
$2,995
$17.280
$3,650
$21.060
$3,744
$21.600
$4,306
$24.840
1
$2,707
$15.619
$3,299
$19.035
$3,384
$19.523
$3,892
$22.452
PT Custodian
$13.63
$16.61
$17.04
$19.60
PT Liquor Store Clerk
$10.33
$12.59
$12.91
$14.85
PT Compost Monitor
$9.70
$11.82
$12.12
$13.94
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of
ATTEST:
Matthew Jaunich, City Administrator
December , 2015. (This replaces Resolution No. 14467)
Gary Forcier, Mayor
Attachment B
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: 2016 Budget & Tax Levy Approvals
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 10
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Attached are the 2016 Budgets and Tax Levies for council's review and approval.
The following budgets have had no major changes made since the Truth in Taxation Meeting:
- Liquor Fund
- Water Fund
- Sewer Fund
- Storm Water Fund
- Refuse Fund
- Compost Fund
The General Fund budget was adjusted downward, reducing expenses by $22,895 and in turn reducing the tax levy
from 2.5% to a 2.0% increase. We were able to reduce our prior projections for wages & benefits by replacing the
Building Official position at a lower wage rate than previously budgeted, resulting in a savings of $16,645. Fuel
expense was also reduced due to the significant drop in gas prices. The current budget assumes a very conservative
decrease of 7.5%, or roughly $11,250 for the general fund.
The current General Fund budget also reflects a $5,000 addition to address holiday lighting in the downtown area.
The following levies are presented for your review and approval:
- General Fund Levy (2% incr) & Debt Levy (1% incr) - $6,769,035; total levy increase of 1.7%
- HRA Levy (2.9% incr) - $160,141
- EDA Levy (2.9% incr) - $156,939
I've also attached the analysis that shows the impact the total City levy has on the median home value. Option #2 is
what we are currently proposing. Option #3 was shown at the Truth in Taxation meeting and Option #4 is the
preliminary levy set by council in September. The final levy cannot increase from September but can decrease.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve each Budget and set each Tax Levy per resolution, or with any changes as council may decide.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: 0.00 Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
December 22, 2015
To the Honorable Mayor Gary Forcier and
City Council Members of the city of Hutchinson
RE: 2016 Budget Message
Dear Mayor Forcier and Council Members:
Office of the City Administrator
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522
320-234-4241/Fax 320-234-4240
The following material constitutes the proposed general fund, enterprise funds, debt service
funds and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the city of Hutchinson for 2016. There have
been a couple of minor changes since the truth -in -taxation hearing that was held on December 3,
but nothing substantial. The budget package before you for consideration represents extensive
work done by the department directors and their staff, finance director Andy Reid, myself, and
you, the Mayor and City Council. The budget development process began in late April and
continued throughout the summer into September when the preliminary budget and tax levy was
adopted. The preliminary budget included a deficit of $65,639. The department directors worked
on reducing that deficit during the months of September through November. The budget was
subsequently revised and reprioritized by myself and Andy Reid over the last month. The 2016
final budget and tax levy numbers being presented to you today is the culmination of 8 months of
work by the great staff of the city of Hutchinson that included five work sessions and a public
hearing with the city council.
Our budget is driven by several different factors. The primary factor is the type and level of
services we want to provide the community as a whole. It is your role as the Mayor and council
members and policymakers to determine what types, and to what extent, services will be
provided to the citizens of Hutchinson regarding public safety; streets and highways; culture and
recreation; general government; water, sewer and garbage services; as well as the airport,
cemetery, library services, liquor store and Creekside. Another factor that goes into developing a
local municipal budget has to do with how affected the City is by unfunded mandates made at
the State and Federal levels of government. Some of those requirements may be good, some may
be bad, and some may be questionable in value. Still, many times local governments have no
choice to meet these requirements and pay the associated costs. Unfunded mandates can range
from personnel practices to water and wastewater treatment standards, with the costs of these
mandates being covered by the taxpayers.
When it comes to developing a budget, it is my belief that the annual budget, which includes a 5 -
year capital plan, is one of the biggest policy decisions a city council can make. The policy of a
budget more or less drives the "work" of the city and is one of the forces behind achieving the
City's Mission Statement and funding its six core areas of focus. My philosophy in helping to
develop this budget and future budgets is to balance the needs of the City Council, department
directors and staff with the costs associated with the desired service levels and needs of the
public, all the time being aware of the desire to keep the tax levy low to encourage growth within
the community. Ultimately, the needs versus the wants are decided by you, the elected officials.
The development of the 2016 budget included the consideration of five long-term goals that will
be an emphasis on budget planning in the years to come. Those goals are as follows:
1. What should current and future tax levies look like?
2. What levels of services should the City perform and provide now and in the future?
3. What is an acceptable level of debt?
4. What is our level of investment in technology and equipment, and what period of
payback is acceptable?
5. What are our future infrastructure needs (roads, utilities, buildings, etc.) and how are we
going to pay for them?
This coming year represents the third straight year that the City will see its Local Government
Aid (LGA) increased. Our 2016 LGA payment is expected to be at $2,286,660, a $16,143
increase from our 2015 amount. Even with the slight increase in LGA next year and the fact that
this is the third straight year of an increase, our amount is still $145,917 (6%) less than the
amount we received in 2006. As a matter of fact, LGA has been quite volatile over the past 15 or
so years. Since 2000, including next year, we will have seen our LGA raised 8 different times
with significant increases in 2002 ($728,479), 2006 ($452,309) and 2014 ($428,927). However,
we have also seen our LGA lowered 4 times during that same period with significant decreases
in 2003 ($374,467), 2008 ($509,456) and 2010 ($268,501). Our peak years for total LGA
received were in 2002 ($2,305,717), 2006 ($2,432,577) and 2007 ($2,371,950). Our valley years
were 2010 to 2013 when our LGA amount was set at $1,784,272.
As we look to the future, I believe it will continue to be important for the City to continue its
efforts to encourage growth throughout all aspects of the City. Obviously it's important to see
continued growth within the housing and commercial markets. However, the greatest impact to
the City would be to see new industrial growth; something our EDA is currently working on.
More property taxpayers mean everyone pays less if the overall tax levy stays constant. More
commercial and industrial growth will lower the tax burden on all other properties due to their
higher tax classification. Therefore, budgets and levies that grow with inflation and/or new
spending can remain stable on individual taxpayers due to more taxpayers sharing the burden.
Unless the tax base grows faster than the rate of inflation plus new spending, the individual tax
burden will grow if we increase the tax rate.
Fortunately for the City, our tax base is growing and our tax levy increases continue to remain
relatively low allowing us to keep our tax burden steady if not lower than previous years. From
2014 to 2015 we saw our overall market value increase by 2.9% from $840,826,100 to
$865,629,000; the third straight year of an increase. The largest area of growth was seen in our
residential values which experienced a 4.6% growth. Along with our market values increasing,
we have also seen our total tax capacity increase from $9,111,340 in 2014 to $9,323,770; an
increase of 2.3%. One thing to be aware of when setting tax levies in Hutchinson is the fact that
the city's value (56.46%) and tax capacity (45.44%) is wrapped up mostly in our residential
homesteaded property. While Hutchinson's residential homesteaded property values and tax
capacity is lower than the state average, it is the fifth -highest (out of 17) among outstate regional
2
centers we compare ourselves too. As noted previously, the more commercial and industrial
property a city has; the lower the tax burden will be on residential homes. Identifying
opportunities to expand our commercial and industrial tax base will help to ease the tax burden
not only to our residential properties but to all of our properties.
And with that, here in detail are more specifics regarding the 2016 municipal budget.
Tax Levy
The tax levy for the general fund has been set at $4,569,035 up by $89,589 from 2015; an
increase of 2.0 percent. This will be the first increase to the general fund tax levy since 2011.
The debt service levy for 2016 has been set at $2,200,000; an increase of 1% ($22,807) and the
third straight year of an increase. The EDA and HRA tax levies are also increasing by 2.9% in
2016. Overall, the total tax levy impact to a Hutchinson resident has been set at $7,086,115, up
by $121,481 from 2015; an increase of 1.7%. For comparison purposes, the 2015 total tax levy
increased by 1.6% from 2014. The biggest reason for the tax levy increase is to cover costs
associated with increases to wages and benefits. Some of this is normal growth; some of it is
related to new positions and extended hours at certain facilities. The tax increase for next year
will represent at least the third straight year of a municipal tax increase which includes our
general fund and debt fund levies. Since 2010 our total property tax levy impact has increased on
an average basis by 1.5%. Even with the tax levy increase, the proposed average city tax rate for
next year will be at 72.60%, down from 74.42% in 2015. A home valued at $144,000 will see an
estimated city tax increase of $51 (6.3%) in 2016; however most of this increase will be due to
increased median home values. For comparison purposes, a 0% tax levy increase would have still
resulted in a likely property tax increase of $37 due to those increased values.
General Fund Revenues and Expenditures
The General Fund is the primary operation fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial
resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The general fund is balanced
with revenues of $11,463,235 and expenditures of $11,463,235 leaving a budgeted surplus of $0.
The need for additional budget reserves is not needed at this time due to a healthy general fund
balance. 2014 audit numbers showed that the City had a general fund balance of $6,734,527,
approximately 60% of the general fund budget for 2015. The State Auditor has recommended to
cities that their general fund balance should be in the range of 30% to 50%. With that in mind,
the Council needs to be aware of the fact that we are planning on using roughly $1 million in
general fund balance reserves over the next two years to help cover costs associated with
construction of the new outdoor pool/aquatic center. That will likely lower our general fund
balance to about 50% of budgeted expenditures if all other factors remain the same.
Outside of the general fund tax levy increase and minor LGA increase, there were a few notable
additional changes to general fund revenues. The 2016 budget includes the restoration of the
PILOT payment (based on 2.75% of the utilities revenue) from Hutchinson Utilities and will be
an increase of $569,350 from what we received in 2015. The general fund also includes an
$119,000 transfer from our self-insurance fund to help cover the City's employee HSA
contribution costs. Generally speaking, property taxes account for 40% of all general fund
revenues, 20% comes from charges for service (DMV, recreation and community education fees,
etc.), and 20% comes from transfers -in (HUC, Liquor, Creekside, Hospital, etc.). The general
fund revenues of $11,463,235 are a budget increase of 2.5% from 2015.
With regard to general fund expenditures, the biggest reason for the increase derives from
increases in employee salary and benefits. This is a combination of two things; one being normal
growth due to performance evaluations; the other factor being from the addition of new positions
and extended hours at certain facilities. In regards to our salary and benefit package, the City
continues to offer an attractive wage and benefit package to assist in the recruitment and
retention of capable and well-qualified employees. This will be an important issue for the City as
we move forward into the baby -boom retirement years where we'll see more competition
between all industries for well-qualified skilled workers.
Minor needs like additional costs associated with next year's elections, inflation, and costs for a
job and classification study also influenced the increase in budgeted expenses. Generally
speaking, public safety accounts for 34% of all budgeted expenditures in the general fund; 26%
goes to general government; 21% goes to culture and recreation, and 17% goes to streets and
highways. Those percentages are roughly the same as our 2015 budget. Overall, budgeted
general fund expenditures increased by 0.9% from $11,365,002 (amended) in 2015 to
$11,463,235 in 2016.
Public Enterprise Funds
Liquor Hutch, Creekside, water, sewer, storm water and refuse (garbage) funds all comprise the
City's public enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are
financed and operated in a manner similar to that of a private business enterprise. Public
enterprise funds should be self-sufficient with user charges (revenues) supporting the
expenditures. That is the case in Hutchinson as our public enterprise funds remain healthy with
good fund balances. It is estimated that 2015 year-end numbers will show the liquor fund with a
cash balance of $307,707; the water fund with a cash balance of $3,495,371; the sewer fund with
a cash balance of $4,321,937; the storm sewer fund with a cash balance of $1,198,166; the refuse
fund with a cash balance of $1,205,360; and the Creekside fund with a balance of $2,140.329.
Five of the six enterprise funds will have cash balances well above their targeted amount, which
is based on 25% of their operating costs plus one year of debt service payments, except for the
liquor fund.
The 2016 budget for the six enterprise funds projects sufficient revenue to cover the expenses of
every fund outside of depreciation. With that being said, revenues and expenses for next year are
expected to remain relatively steady in the water, sewer and refuse funds with none of those
funds experiencing a rate increase. Garbage rates were last increased in 2008 with water and
sewer rates last being increased in 2011. Budgeted water revenues are set at $3,126,000 in 2016,
down from $3,159,153 (1%) in 2015. Budgeted water expenses are set at $3,974,989 in 2016,
down from $4,101,749 (3%) in 2015. Budgeted sewer revenues are set at $4,026,000 in 2016,
slightly down from $4,040,153 in 2015. Budgeted sewer expenses are set at $5,117,234 in 2016,
down from $5,518,302 (7%) in 2015. Both the water and sewer funds are seeing reduced costs
due the automatic meter reading system; a restructured department; and the solar array project
(sewer) that was all implemented by the City in 2015. Budgeted refuse revenues are set at
$1,164,500 in 2016, up from $1,148,700 (1%) in 2015. Budgeted refuse expenses are set at
$1,259,941 in 2016, down from $1,320,767 (5%) in 2015. The refuse fund is seeing reduced
costs due to the City switching garbage haulers. Budgeted storm water revenues are set at
$862,867 in 2016, up from $796,200 (8%) in 2015. Budgeted storm water expenses are set at
$867,111 in 2016, slightly down from $871,085 in 2015. The storm water fund has budgeted for
a rate increase of about 8.3%.
0
Liquor Hutch is projecting revenue to grow from $5,698,000 in 2015 to $5,871,000 in 2016. This
revenue growth is the result of a projected sales growth of 3%. Liquor Hutch is also projecting
expenses to grow from $5,713,752 in 2015 to $5,891,676 in 2016. This growth in expenses of
about 3% is due to an increase in wages and benefits and the cost of product. Creekside is
projecting revenue to decrease from $2,793,660 in 2015 to $1,701,296 in 2016, a 39% drop in
revenue. This drop in revenue is due to a lower production model that will focus on higher
margin products. The loss of revenue with a lower production model will also decrease expenses
at Creekside. The 2016 budget shows expenses coming in at $1,817,748, a decrease from the
2015 budget of $3,115,046 (42%)
The 2016 budget for the City's enterprise funds are expected to see a positive cash now within
all funds, which should result in a growth of an already healthy fund balance for each fund.
Liquor Hutch ($475,000) and Creekside ($110,000) continue to be a valuable asset to the City
and will contribute $585,000 to the general fund in 2016. Overall, the enterprise funds are
expected to transfer $726,290 to the general fund in 2016, up from $716,290 in 2015 (1.4%).
These fund transfers continue to assist the City as a means to soften the tax burden to the
residents of Hutchinson. The City would have to raise its property taxes or lower its expenses by
over 10% to replace this revenue if these transfers did not exist.
Debt Service Funds
Debt service funds are maintained to account for the payment of principal and interest related to
debt issued by the City. Fund balances of these funds are restricted to debt service requirements
and are not available for current expenditure purposes until the debt is retired. Debt service
payments for next year will cost the City $2,598,524, a 30.6% decrease from 2015 ($3,745,611).
Revenue collected for these payments will amount to $2,942,000 of which $2,200,000 will come
from property taxes through our debt levy. Additional revenues for debt service payments come
from special assessments, interest, and construction fund transfers. Debt service related to water,
sewer, and storm water are not included within the debt service funds, but are accounted for
within those respective enterprise funds. The total long term debt of the City is currently at
$16,780,000, down from $17,940,000 in 2015.
Capital Improvement Plan
On an annual budgeting basis, the City develops a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to
assist in the financing of major capital needs of the city. The CIP is a budget document that
realistically projects city needs, outlines means by which those needs can be met, and provides
prioritization of those needs. The capital planning process provides the City with a framework to
make decisions regarding current and future city needs considering the city's financial capability.
The CIP commits the City to a long term capital plan that ensures that expenditures can be made
to add or replace capital items when needed, without significant fluctuations in the property tax
levy. Capital planning enables the City to maintain a stable property tax rate, prevents peaks and
valleys in its debt retirement program, and establishes and thereafter improves its credit rating.
The plan is based upon numerous long-range planning documents that are updated regularly by
several different committees and staff members.
Next year's five-year CIP is valued at $49,987,017, an increase of 5.5% from last year's
$47,364,233 five-year plan. The 2016 budget portion of that plan is set at $9,205,628, a decrease
of 9% from our 2015 budgeted amount. The five-year plan accounts for various investments
throughout many different levels of city government. 61 % of the five-year plan will go to
investments in the City's infrastructure system (new construction, reclaims, partial
reconstruction); 18% will be spent on park and recreation activities (new aquatic center, civic
arena, parks, etc.); 11 % will be spent on enterprise related activities (Creekside, Liquor Hutch,
water, sewer, etc.); with the remaining dollars being spent on various public works projects,
public safety and general government. In regards to the 2016 budget, 43% of the CIP will go to
pay for infrastructure projects; 30% will be spent on park and recreation and activity; and 14%
will be spent on enterprise related projects. The largest projects slated for next year include the
start of the aquatic center ($5 million over two years); a water tower reconditioning project on
Golf Course Road, various other street and infrastructure projects; and heavy equipment
upgrades to various departments. Funding for the five-year CIP will come from various sources.
The largest source will come from the revenue generated from some of our enterprise funds to
the tune of roughly 23% of the CIP. Property taxes (21 %), city -issued debt (20%), State and
Federal aid/grants (19%), and special assessments (12%) make up the majority of the rest of the
funding. Probably one of the more anticipated projects for next year will be the new aquatic
center/outdoor pool. The proposed funding sources for that project will not come from any
property taxes, but from a variety of non -designated funds and reserves.
Conclusion
As with past years, developing budgets is an on-going process of balancing costs with the desired
levels of needs and wants of the community, elected officials and department directors. Having
to balance the wants of the community and sometimes their unwillingness to pay for those wants
is always a challenging aspect of the city budgeting process. Budgets that require property tax
increases are difficult for me to recommend. Excessive taxes are an impediment to economic
development and growth. Many residents will question the value of services they do not use. The
difficult part as public policy makers is helping them to understand the overall value of those
services to the community as a whole, and not as individuals. With that being said, I do not
believe the proposed tax levy is excessive and history will show that the City has always been
very conscientious when it comes to the tax burden it's willing to put on its residents. However,
the costs of "doing business" as a city does not seem to be decreasing or getting any easier.
Because of this, I believe it is appropriate to recommend a modest tax increase of roughly 1.7%
for 2016. With that being said, I am recommending that you approve the resolutions setting the
tax levies and budgets for 2016.
I would like to think that the future of the City is quite bright. The greatest relief to a City's tax
burden is growth and more importantly, growth within the commercial and industrial tax bases.
Signs are pointing to that growth occurring within the City. The City's average monthly
unemployment rate for 2015 (through November) was at 4.5%, the lowest it's been since 2006.
Our average monthly employed numbers for 2015 (through November) was at 7,184, the highest
it's been since 2008. Vacancy rates for our market rate rental units are at historic lows and our
median sales price of our residential homes have raised from their lows of $101,400 in 2012 to
$145,925 through November of 2015. Home resales in 2014 and 2015 were at levels we have not
seen since 2006 and home foreclosures (lack thereof) are at levels we have not seen since the
early to mid -2000s. We've also seen an uptick in commercial construction and new homes
construction from the down years of 2009 to 2012. While these numbers are great, we are also
starting to see some of the side effects of a very competitive job market. The EDA reported that
during the past year that between 30 to 40 high paying jobs were left vacant at our area
manufacturers due to a lack of qualified skilled workers. With the baby boom generation retiring
in large numbers over the next 3-5 years we know that the demand in town will continue to
increase for qualified skilled workers.
G'1
Finally, I would like to thank the department directors; more importantly finance director Andy
Reid, and the Mayor and City Council for your assistance in this budget planning process. Your
involvement in this process is valuable to the citizens of Hutchinson. With this being my first
year with the City, it was comfortable to know the depth of knowledge and the policies and
procedures that exists to make this a "well-oiled machine" in regards to the budget process. We
are blessed as a community to have those who work for us knowing the hard work they put into
their job every day. The City is well positioned to not only handle growth, but any challenges
that may present themselves in the future. I hope the information provided to you is useful in
helping you understand the 2016 Hutchinson Municipal Budget and I look forward to going
through this budget process again next year!
Sincerely,
f
Matthew Ja nich
City Administra or
VA
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14485
ADOPTING 2016 LIQUOR FUND BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Liquor Fund Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Liquor Sales $ 1,978,000
Beer Sales 2,852,000
Wine Sales 927,000
Miscellaneous Sales 111,000
Other Revenues 3,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 5,871,000
EXPENSES
Cost of Sales
$ 4,398,810
Wages & Benefits
568,211
Supplies
17,400
Services & Charges
198,350
Miscellaneous Expenses
5,650
Depreciation Expense
80,200
Capital Outlay
20,000
Debt Service
128,055
Transfers -Out
475,000
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ 5,891,676
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ (20,676)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matt Jaunich
City Administrator
REVENUES:
Sales - Liquor
Sales - Beer
Sales - Wine
Sales - Other
Total Sales
Other Revenues
TOTAL REVENUES
Gross Margin %
EXPENDITURES:
Cost of Sales
Wages & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Miscellaneous Expenses
Depreciation Expense
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Transfers -Out
Liquor Fund
Summary Budget
Approved Proposed
Actual Budget Budget
2014 2015 2016
2015 / 2016 Change
Amount %
1,902,029
1,907,000
1,978,000
71,000
3.7%
2,732,853
2,753,000
2,852,000
99,000
3.6%
913,682
925,000
927,000
2,000
0.2%
64,167
110,000
111,000
1,000
0.9%
5,612,731
5,695,000
5,868,000
173,000
3.2%
3,117 3,000 3,000 - 100.0%
5,615,848
24.5%
5,698,000
25.0%
5,871,000
25.0%
173,000 3.2%
4,236,118
4,271,071
4,398,810
127,739
3.0%
524,203
521,408
568,211
46,803
9.0%
17,626
16,600
17,400
800
4.8%
206,559
196,793
198,350
1,557
0.8%
3,572
5,500
5,650
150
2.7%
77,965
82,075
80,200
(1,875)
-2.3%
-
27,000
20,000
(7,000)
-25.9%
32,045
128,305
128,055
(250)
-0.2%
450,000
465,000
475,000
10,000
2.2%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,548,088 5,713,752 5,891,676 177,924 3.3%
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) 67,759 (15,752) (20,676) (4,924)
Reconciliation to Cash Flow:
Net Revenue
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation)
Net Change in Cash for Year
(20,676)
80,200
59,524
Estimated Cash Balance 307,707 367,231
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14486
ADOPTING 2016 WATER BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Water Fund Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Water Revenues $2,306,000
Local Sales Tax Revenue 685,000
Charges for Services 50,000
Interest Earnings 30,000
Reimbursements 55,000
TOTAL REVENUES $3,126,000
EXPENSES
Wages & Benefits
$ 479,983
Supplies
122,400
Services & Charges
507,350
Miscellaneous Expenses
13,500
Depreciation
1,150, 000
Debt Service
1,408,611
Capital Outlay
250,000
Transfers -Out
43,145
TOTAL EXPENSES
$3,974,989
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ (848,989)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Water Fund
Summary Budget
Approved
Actual Budget
2014 2015
REVENUES:
Proposed
Budget 2015 / 2016 Change
2016 Amount %
Local Sales Tax
661,476
725,000
685,000
(40,000)
-5.5%
Water Sales
2,324,418
2,300,000
2,306,000
6,000
0.3%
Intergovernmental Revenue
-
-
-
-
0.0%
Charges for Services
48,454
50,000
50,000
-
0.0%
Investment Earnings
48,924
34,153
30,000
(4,153)
-12.2%
Reimbursements
8,176
50,000
55,000
5,000
10.0%
Other Financing Sources
11,326
-
-
-
0.0%
Fund Balance
835,319
-
-
-
0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 3,938,093 3,159,153 3,126,000 (33,153) -1.0%
EXPENDITURES:
Wages & Benefits
424,594
500,766
479,983
(20,783)
-4.2%
Supplies
105,214
123,250
122,400
(850)
-0.7%
Services & Charges
515,568
457,724
507,350
49,626
10.8%
Miscellaneous Expenses
10,800
16,700
13,500
(3,200)
-19.2%
Depreciation
1,093,809
1,104,000
1,150,000
46,000
4.2%
Debt Service
417,019
1,312,414
1,408,611
96,197
7.3%
Capital Outlay
-
543,750
250,000
(293,750)
-54.0%
Transfers -Out
315,507
43,145
43,145
-
0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,882,511 4,101,749 3,974,989 (126,760) -3.1%
NET REVENUES 1,055,583 (942,596) (848,989) 93,607
Reconciliation to Cash Flow:
Net Revenue (848,989)
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation) 1,150,000
Net Change in Cash for Year 301,011
Estimated Cash Balance 3,495,371 3,796,382
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14487
ADOPTING 2016 SEWER BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Sewer Fund Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Sewer Revenues $ 3,213,000
Local Option Sales Tax Revenue 685,000
Permits 7,000
Charges for Services 4,000
Investment Earnings 35,000
Reimbursements 82,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 4,026,000
EXPENSES
Wages & Benefits $ 622,085
Supplies 236,100
Services & Charges 742,550
Miscellaneous Expenses 24,500
Depreciation 1,530,000
Debt Service 1,568,854
Capital Outlay 350,000
Transfers -Out 43,145
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 5,117,234
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $(1,091,234)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Sewer Fund
Summary Budget
Actual Budget Final 2015 / 2016 Change
2014 2015 Budget Amount %
REVENUES:
Local Sales Tax
661,821
725,000
685,000
(40,000)
-5.5%
Sewer Sales
3,237,624
3,203,000
3,213,000
10,000
0.3%
Permits
6,700
7,000
7,000
-
0.0%
Charges for Services
7,691
4,000
4,000
-
0.0%
Investment Earnings
65,487
39,153
35,000
(4,153)
-10.6%
Reimbursements
33,113
62,000
82,000
20,000
32.3%
Other Financing Sources
11,410
-
-
-
0.0%
Fund Balance
573,254
-
-
-
0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 4,597,101 4,040,153 4,026,000 (14,153) -0.4%
EXPENDITURES:
Wages & Benefits
605,415
679,626
622,085
(57,541)
-8.5%
Supplies
196,910
249,300
236,100
(13,200)
-5.3%
Services & Charges
746,169
762,511
742,550
(19,961)
-2.6%
Miscellaneous Expenses
31,900
24,000
24,500
500
2.1%
Depreciation
1,571,081
1,495,000
1,530,000
35,000
2.3%
Debt Service
373,716
1,573,470
1,568,854
(4,616)
-0.3%
Capital Outlay
-
691,250
350,000
(341,250)
-49.4%
Transfers -Out
147,520
43,145
43,145
-
0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
3,672,709
5,518,302
5,117,234
(401,068)
-7.3%
NET REVENUES 924,391 (1,478,149) (1,091,234) 386,915
Reconciliation to Cash Flow
Net Revenue (1,091,234)
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation) 1,530,000
Net Change in Cash for Year 438,766
Solar grant proceeds received in 2016 958,000
Estimated Cash Balance 4,321,937 5,718,703
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14488
ADOPTING 2016 STORM WATER UTILITY BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Storm Water Utility Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Storm Water Revenues $ 855,867
Interest Earnings 5,000
Other Revenues 2,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 862,867
EXPENSES
Wages & Benefits $ 243,986
Supplies 43,925
Services & Charges 164,100
Miscellaneous Expenses 11,250
Depreciation 133,000
Debt Service 150,850
Capital Outlay 120,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 867,111
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ (4,244)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Storm Water Fund
Summary Budget
Actual Budget Final 2015 / 2016 Change
2014 2015 Budget Amount %
REVENUES:
Storm Water Sales
729,105 790,200 855,867
65,667 8.3%
Permits
1,780 - -
- 0.0%
Charges for Services
- - -
- 0.0%
Investment Earnings
12,230 5,000 5,000
- 0.0%
Reimbursements
4,888 1,000 2,000
1,000 100.0%
Fund Balance
559,630 - -
- 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 1,307,633 796,200 862,867 66,667 8.4%
EXPENDITURES:
Wages & Benefits
177,918
241,318
243,986
2,668
1.1%
Supplies
35,845
34,175
43,925
9,750
28.5%
Services & Charges
130,748
146,350
164,100
17,750
12.1%
Miscellaneous Expenses
8,642
11,250
11,250
-
0.0%
Depreciation
124,220
116,000
133,000
17,000
14.7%
Debt Service
42,328
193,992
150,850
(43,142)
-22.2%
Capital Outlay
-
128,000
120,000
(8,000)
-6.3%
Transfers -Out
-
-
-
-
0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 519,702 871,085 867,111 (3,974) -0.5%
NET REVENUES 787,931 (74,885) (4,244) 70,641
Reconciliation to Cash Flow:
Net Revenue (4,244)
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation) 133,000
Net Change in Cash for Year 128,756
Estimated Cash Balance 1,198,166 1,326,922
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14489
ADOPTING 2016 REFUSE FUND BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Refuse Fund Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Refuse Services $1,149,500
SCORE - County reimbursement of scale monitoring costs 12,500
Other Revenues 27500
TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,164,500
EXPENSES
Wages & Benefits $ 190,804
Supplies 62,400
Services & Charges 704,727
Miscellaneous Expenses 3,750
Depreciation 124,000
Capital Outlay 95,000
Debt Service 24,260
Transfers -Out 55,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 1,259,941
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ (95,441)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Summary Budget
Refuse Fund
Approved Proposed
Actual Budget Budget
2014 2015 2016
2015 / 2016 Change
Amount %
REVENUES:
Intergovernmental Revenue 12,600 12,500 12,500 - 0.0%
Refuse Sales 1,142,108 1,133,700 1,149,500 15,800 1.4%
Miscellaneous Revenues 13,602 2,500 2,500 - 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
Wages & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Miscellaneous Expenses
Depreciation
Capital Outlay
Debt Service
Transfers -Out
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET REVENUE
1,168, 310 1,148, 700 1,164, 500 15,800 1.4%
171,718
179,288
190,804
11,516
6.4%
65,474
65,400
62,400
(3,000)
-4.6%
740,906
702,650
704,727
2,077
0.3%
3,068
3,250
3,750
500
15.4%
121,877
131,500
124,000
(7,500)
-5.7%
-
159,418
95,000
(64,418)
-40.4%
2,984
24,261
24,260
(1)
0.0%
55,000
55,000
55,000
-
0.0%
1,161,026 1,320,767 1,259,941 (60,826) -4.6%
Reconciliation to Cash Flow:
Net Revenue
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation)
Net Change in Cash for Year
7,284 (172,067) (95,441) 76,626
(95,441)
124,000
28,559
Estimated Cash Balance 1,205,360 1,233,919
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14490
ADOPTING 2016 COMPOST FUND BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT the annual Compost Fund Budget for the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal
year 2016, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the
City Council is hereby adopted. The total of said budget and major division thereof
being as follows:
REVENUES
Sales $ 1,636,796
Other Charges & Fees 58,500
Other Revenues 6,000
TOTAL REVENUES $ 1,701,296
EXPENSES
Cost of Goods Sold
$ 1,117,265
Inventory Adjustment
(525,746)
Wages & Benefits
559,899
Supplies
70,257
Services & Charges
188,573
Miscellaneous Expenses
13,500
Depreciation
134,000
Capital Outlay
150,000
Transfers -Out
110,000
TOTAL EXPENSES
$ 1,817,748
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ (116,452)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Summary Budget
Compost Fund
TOTAL REVENUES 3,187,594 2,793,660 1,701,296 (1,092,364) -39.1%
EXPENDITURES:
Approved
Proposed
Actual
Budget
Budget
2015 / 2016 Change
(1,240,235)
2014
2015
2016
Amount %
REVENUES:
528,822
-50.1%
Wages & Benefits
699,553
Compost Sales
3,007,552
2,729,160
1,636,796
(1,092,364) -40.0%
Charges for Services
142,856
58,500
58,500
- 0.0%
Other Revenues
37,187
6,000
6,000
- 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 3,187,594 2,793,660 1,701,296 (1,092,364) -39.1%
EXPENDITURES:
Cost of Goods Sold
2,357,752
2,357,500
1,117,265
(1,240,235)
-52.6%
Inventory Adjustment
(1,122,409)
(1,054,568)
(525,746)
528,822
-50.1%
Wages & Benefits
699,553
797,164
559,899
(237,265)
-29.8%
Supplies
174,182
154,500
70,257
(84,243)
-54.5%
Services & Charges
445,672
344,350
188,573
(155,777)
-45.2%
Miscellaneous Expenses
43,943
13,500
13,500
-
0.0%
Depreciation
132,600
142,600
134,000
(8,600)
-6.0%
Capital Outlay
-
250,000
150,000
(100,000)
-40.0%
Transfers -Out
102,847
110,000
110,000
-
0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
2,834,139
3,115,046
1,817,748
(1,297,298)
-41.6%
NET REVENUE 353,455 (321,386) (116,452) 204,934
Reconciliation to Cash Flow:
Net Revenue (116,452)
Add non-cash activity (Depreciation) 134,000
Net Change in Cash for Year 17,548
Estimated Cash Balance 2,140,329 2,157,877
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14491
ADOPTING THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the annual General Fund budget of the City of Hutchinson for fiscal year 2016
which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the City Council is
hereby Adopted; the total of said budget and the major division thereof being as follows:
APPROPRIATIONS
Wages & Benefits $ 7,595,480
Supplies 770,593
Services & Charges 2,461,936
Miscellaneous Expenses 525,226
Transfers -Out 100,000
Capital Outlay 10,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 11,463,235
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ -
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
GENERALFUND
CURRENT REVENUES
Taxes
$ 4,581,035
Other Taxes
272,000
Licenses & Permits
271,500
Intergovernmental Revenue
1,284,330
Charges for Services
2,350,666
Fines & Forfeitures
55,000
Miscellaneous Revenues
291,300
Transfers -In
2,332,404
Fund Balance
25,000
TOTAL REVENUES
$ 11,463,235
APPROPRIATIONS
Wages & Benefits $ 7,595,480
Supplies 770,593
Services & Charges 2,461,936
Miscellaneous Expenses 525,226
Transfers -Out 100,000
Capital Outlay 10,000
TOTAL EXPENSES $ 11,463,235
NET REVENUE / (LOSS) $ -
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
General Fund
Summary Budget
Actual Budget 2016
2014 2015 Final
REVENUES:
2015 / 2016 Change
Amount %
Taxes
4,500,826
4,491,446
4,581,035
89,589
2.0%
Other Taxes
271,034
257,500
272,000
14,500
5.6%
Licenses & Permits
283,487
267,900
271,500
3,600
1.3%
Intergovernmental Revenue
1,172,473
1,225,766
1,284,330
58,564
4.8%
Charges for Services
2,064,088
2,031,070
2,350,666
319,596
15.7%
Fines & Forfeitures
59,737
55,000
55,000
-
0.0%
Miscellaneous Revenues
706,882
666,225
291,300
(374,925)
-56.3%
Transfers -In
2,121,653
2,160,537
2,332,404
171,867
8.0%
Fund Balance
-
25,000
25,000
-
0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 11,180,179 11,180,444 11,463,235 282,791 2.5%
EXPENDITURES:
Wages & Benefits
Supplies
Services & Charges
Miscellaneous Expenses
Transfers -Out
Capital Outlay
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
6,865,625
7,491,996
7,595,480
103,484
1.4%
788,237
782,636
770,593
(12,043)
-1.5%
2,286,618
2,310,846
2,461,936
151,090
6.5%
597,829
498,116
525,226
27,110
5.4%
143,776
96,850
100,000
3,150
3.3%
13,800
184,558
10,000
(174,558)
-94.6%
10,695,885 11,365,002 11,463,235 98,233 0.9%
NET REVENUES 484,294 (184,558) - 184,558
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14492
2016 FINAL TAX LEVY FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THAT A NET tax levy for the City of Hutchinson for 2016 is hereby set in the amount
of: $6,769,035.
The detail for this levy is as follows:
LEVY Amount
General Fund $ 4,569,035
Improvement Bonds:
2004
452,656
2006
516,591
2007
74,508
2008
161,244
2009
179,583
2010
105,876
2011
160,645
2012
135,231
2013
137,669
2014
128,934
2015
147,063
Total Improvement Bonds
$ 2,200,000
TOTAL TAX LEVY $ 6,769,035
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
"PreliminaryTax Levy
y
PRELIMINARY 2016
Adopted 2015 Option #1 Option #2 Option #3 Option #4
General Fund levy: 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%
Debt levy: 5.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%
TAX CAPACITY
$ 9,111,340 $
9,323,770 $
9,323,770 $
9,323,770 $
9,323,770
% Change
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
2.3%
Tax Levy - General Fund
4,479,446
4,479,446
4,569,035
4,591,430
4,613,829
Tax Levy - Debt Service
2,177,193
2,177,193
2,200,000
2,200,000
2,200,000
TOTAL LEVY
$ 6,656,639 $
6,656,639 $
6,769,035 $
6,791,430 $
6,813,829
(24,300)
Total Levy % Increase over 2015
(24,300)
0.0%
1.7%
2.0%
2.4%
Tax Rate
74.416%
71.394%
72.600%
72.840%
73.080%
PRELIMINARY 2016
Homestead Property: Adopted 2015
Option #1
Option #2
Option #3
Option #4
Median Home Value $
135,000
$
144,000
$
144,000
$
144,000
$
144,000
Homestead Exclusion
(25,100)
(24,300)
(24,300)
(24,300)
(24,300)
Net Taxable Value $
109,900
$
119,700
$
119,700
$
119,700
$
119,700
% Change
8.9%
8.9%
8.9%
8.9%
Tax Capacity (1 %) $
1,099
$
1,197
$
1,197
$
1,197
$
1,197
Estimated City Tax
818
855
869
872
875
Change from 2015
$
37
$
51
$
54
$
57
% Change
4.5%
6.3%
6.6%
7.0%
Change based on Comparable Valuation
$
(33)
$
(20)
$
(17)
$
(15)
Change due to Higher Valuation
$
70
$
71
$
71
$
72
Net Change
$
37
$
51
$
54
$
57
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14493
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
SETTING 2016 FINAL TAX LEVY
FOR
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT
HUTCHINSON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS the City of Hutchinson hereby establishes a special taxing district
for the purpose of Hutchinson Housing Redevelopment Authority (Hutchinson HRA)
and the financing of such district as authorized under Minn. Statute 469.033.
WHEREAS the Minn Stat 469.033 authorizes a levy to be set for an HRA special tax of
.000185 times estimated market value of the city.
AND for 2016 the authorization yields: .000185 x $865,629,000 = $160,141; the HRA
Board requests for 2016 a levy of $160,141.
THAT the City of Hutchinson hereby establishes a final tax levy for the
above named special taxing district of:
$160,141
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 14494
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
SETTING 2016 FINAL TAX LEVY
FOR
SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT
HUTCHINSON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS the City of Hutchinson hereby establishes a special taxing district
for the purpose of Hutchinson Economic Development Authority (Hutchinson EDA)
and the financing of such district as authorized under Minn. Statute 469.107.
WHEREAS the Minn Stat 469.107 authorizes a levy to be set for an EDA special tax of
.0001813 times estimated market value of the city.
AND for 2016 the authorization yields- .0001813 x $865,629,000 = $156,939; the EDA
Board requests for 2016 a levy of $156,939.
THAT the City of Hutchinson hereby establishes a final tax levy for the
above named special taxing district of:
$156,939
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December 2015.
Gary T. Forcier
Mayor
ATTESTED:
Matthew Jaunich
City Administrator
December 22, 2015
To the Honorable Mayor Gary Forcier and
City Council Members of the city of Hutchinson
RE: 2016 Budget Message
Dear Mayor Forcier and Council Members:
Office of the City Administrator
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522
320-234-4241/Fax 320-234-4240
The following material constitutes the proposed general fund, enterprise funds, debt service
funds and the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the city of Hutchinson for 2016. There have
been a couple of minor changes since the truth -in -taxation hearing that was held on December 3,
but nothing substantial. The budget package before you for consideration represents extensive
work done by the department directors and their staff, finance director Andy Reid, myself, and
you, the Mayor and City Council. The budget development process began in late April and
continued throughout the summer into September when the preliminary budget and tax levy was
adopted. The preliminary budget included a deficit of $65,639. The department directors worked
on reducing that deficit during the months of September through November. The budget was
subsequently revised and reprioritized by myself and Andy Reid over the last month. The 2016
final budget and tax levy numbers being presented to you today is the culmination of 8 months of
work by the great staff of the city of Hutchinson that included five work sessions and a public
hearing with the city council.
Our budget is driven by several different factors. The primary factor is the type and level of
services we want to provide the community as a whole. It is your role as the Mayor and council
members and policymakers to determine what types, and to what extent, services will be
provided to the citizens of Hutchinson regarding public safety; streets and highways; culture and
recreation; general government; water, sewer and garbage services; as well as the airport,
cemetery, library services, liquor store and Creekside. Another factor that goes into developing a
local municipal budget has to do with how affected the City is by unfunded mandates made at
the State and Federal levels of government. Some of those requirements may be good, some may
be bad, and some may be questionable in value. Still, many times local governments have no
choice to meet these requirements and pay the associated costs. Unfunded mandates can range
from personnel practices to water and wastewater treatment standards, with the costs of these
mandates being covered by the taxpayers.
When it comes to developing a budget, it is my belief that the annual budget, which includes a 5 -
year capital plan, is one of the biggest policy decisions a city council can make. The policy of a
budget more or less drives the "work" of the city and is one of the forces behind achieving the
City's Mission Statement and funding its six core areas of focus. My philosophy in helping to
develop this budget and future budgets is to balance the needs of the City Council, department
directors and staff with the costs associated with the desired service levels and needs of the
public, all the time being aware of the desire to keep the tax levy low to encourage growth within
the community. Ultimately, the needs versus the wants are decided by you, the elected officials.
The development of the 2016 budget included the consideration of five long-term goals that will
be an emphasis on budget planning in the years to come. Those goals are as follows:
1. What should current and future tax levies look like?
2. What levels of services should the City perform and provide now and in the future?
3. What is an acceptable level of debt?
4. What is our level of investment in technology and equipment, and what period of
payback is acceptable?
5. What are our future infrastructure needs (roads, utilities, buildings, etc.) and how are we
going to pay for them?
This coming year represents the third straight year that the City will see its Local Government
Aid (LGA) increased. Our 2016 LGA payment is expected to be at $2,286,660, a $16,143
increase from our 2015 amount. Even with the slight increase in LGA next year and the fact that
this is the third straight year of an increase, our amount is still $145,917 (6%) less than the
amount we received in 2006. As a matter of fact, LGA has been quite volatile over the past 15 or
so years. Since 2000, including next year, we will have seen our LGA raised 8 different times
with significant increases in 2002 ($728,479), 2006 ($452,309) and 2014 ($428,927). However,
we have also seen our LGA lowered 4 times during that same period with significant decreases
in 2003 ($374,467), 2008 ($509,456) and 2010 ($268,501). Our peak years for total LGA
received were in 2002 ($2,305,717), 2006 ($2,432,577) and 2007 ($2,371,950). Our valley years
were 2010 to 2013 when our LGA amount was set at $1,784,272.
As we look to the future, I believe it will continue to be important for the City to continue its
efforts to encourage growth throughout all aspects of the City. Obviously it's important to see
continued growth within the housing and commercial markets. However, the greatest impact to
the City would be to see new industrial growth; something our EDA is currently working on.
More property taxpayers mean everyone pays less if the overall tax levy stays constant. More
commercial and industrial growth will lower the tax burden on all other properties due to their
higher tax classification. Therefore, budgets and levies that grow with inflation and/or new
spending can remain stable on individual taxpayers due to more taxpayers sharing the burden.
Unless the tax base grows faster than the rate of inflation plus new spending, the individual tax
burden will grow if we increase the tax rate.
Fortunately for the City, our tax base is growing and our tax levy increases continue to remain
relatively low allowing us to keep our tax burden steady if not lower than previous years. From
2014 to 2015 we saw our overall market value increase by 2.9% from $840,826,100 to
$865,629,000; the third straight year of an increase. The largest area of growth was seen in our
residential values which experienced a 4.6% growth. Along with our market values increasing,
we have also seen our total tax capacity increase from $9,111,340 in 2014 to $9,323,770; an
increase of 2.3%. One thing to be aware of when setting tax levies in Hutchinson is the fact that
the city's value (56.46%) and tax capacity (45.44%) is wrapped up mostly in our residential
homesteaded property. While Hutchinson's residential homesteaded property values and tax
capacity is lower than the state average, it is the fifth -highest (out of 17) among outstate regional
2
centers we compare ourselves too. As noted previously, the more commercial and industrial
property a city has; the lower the tax burden will be on residential homes. Identifying
opportunities to expand our commercial and industrial tax base will help to ease the tax burden
not only to our residential properties but to all of our properties.
And with that, here in detail are more specifics regarding the 2016 municipal budget.
Tax Levy
The tax levy for the general fund has been set at $4,569,035 up by $89,589 from 2015; an
increase of 2.0 percent. This will be the first increase to the general fund tax levy since 2011.
The debt service levy for 2016 has been set at $2,200,000; an increase of 1% ($22,807) and the
third straight year of an increase. The EDA and HRA tax levies are also increasing by 2.9% in
2016. Overall, the total tax levy impact to a Hutchinson resident has been set at $7,086,115, up
by $121,481 from 2015; an increase of 1.7%. For comparison purposes, the 2015 total tax levy
increased by 1.6% from 2014. The biggest reason for the tax levy increase is to cover costs
associated with increases to wages and benefits. Some of this is normal growth; some of it is
related to new positions and extended hours at certain facilities. The tax increase for next year
will represent at least the third straight year of a municipal tax increase which includes our
general fund and debt fund levies. Since 2010 our total property tax levy impact has increased on
an average basis by 1.5%. Even with the tax levy increase, the proposed average city tax rate for
next year will be at 72.60%, down from 74.42% in 2015. A home valued at $144,000 will see an
estimated city tax increase of $51 (6.3%) in 2016; however most of this increase will be due to
increased median home values. For comparison purposes, a 0% tax levy increase would have still
resulted in a likely property tax increase of $37 due to those increased values.
General Fund Revenues and Expenditures
The General Fund is the primary operation fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial
resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The general fund is balanced
with revenues of $11,463,235 and expenditures of $11,463,235 leaving a budgeted surplus of $0.
The need for additional budget reserves is not needed at this time due to a healthy general fund
balance. 2014 audit numbers showed that the City had a general fund balance of $6,734,527,
approximately 60% of the general fund budget for 2015. The State Auditor has recommended to
cities that their general fund balance should be in the range of 30% to 50%. With that in mind,
the Council needs to be aware of the fact that we are planning on using roughly $1 million in
general fund balance reserves over the next two years to help cover costs associated with
construction of the new outdoor pool/aquatic center. That will likely lower our general fund
balance to about 50% of budgeted expenditures if all other factors remain the same.
Outside of the general fund tax levy increase and minor LGA increase, there were a few notable
additional changes to general fund revenues. The 2016 budget includes the restoration of the
PILOT payment (based on 2.75% of the utilities revenue) from Hutchinson Utilities and will be
an increase of $569,350 from what we received in 2015. The general fund also includes an
$119,000 transfer from our self-insurance fund to help cover the City's employee HSA
contribution costs. Generally speaking, property taxes account for 40% of all general fund
revenues, 20% comes from charges for service (DMV, recreation and community education fees,
etc.), and 20% comes from transfers -in (HUC, Liquor, Creekside, Hospital, etc.). The general
fund revenues of $11,463,235 are a budget increase of 2.5% from 2015.
With regard to general fund expenditures, the biggest reason for the increase derives from
increases in employee salary and benefits. This is a combination of two things; one being normal
growth due to performance evaluations; the other factor being from the addition of new positions
and extended hours at certain facilities. In regards to our salary and benefit package, the City
continues to offer an attractive wage and benefit package to assist in the recruitment and
retention of capable and well-qualified employees. This will be an important issue for the City as
we move forward into the baby -boom retirement years where we'll see more competition
between all industries for well-qualified skilled workers.
Minor needs like additional costs associated with next year's elections, inflation, and costs for a
job and classification study also influenced the increase in budgeted expenses. Generally
speaking, public safety accounts for 34% of all budgeted expenditures in the general fund; 26%
goes to general government; 21% goes to culture and recreation, and 17% goes to streets and
highways. Those percentages are roughly the same as our 2015 budget. Overall, budgeted
general fund expenditures increased by 0.9% from $11,365,002 (amended) in 2015 to
$11,463,235 in 2016.
Public Enterprise Funds
Liquor Hutch, Creekside, water, sewer, storm water and refuse (garbage) funds all comprise the
City's public enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are used to account for operations that are
financed and operated in a manner similar to that of a private business enterprise. Public
enterprise funds should be self-sufficient with user charges (revenues) supporting the
expenditures. That is the case in Hutchinson as our public enterprise funds remain healthy with
good fund balances. It is estimated that 2015 year-end numbers will show the liquor fund with a
cash balance of $307,707; the water fund with a cash balance of $3,495,371; the sewer fund with
a cash balance of $4,321,937; the storm sewer fund with a cash balance of $1,198,166; the refuse
fund with a cash balance of $1,205,360; and the Creekside fund with a balance of $2,140.329.
Five of the six enterprise funds will have cash balances well above their targeted amount, which
is based on 25% of their operating costs plus one year of debt service payments, except for the
liquor fund.
The 2016 budget for the six enterprise funds projects sufficient revenue to cover the expenses of
every fund outside of depreciation. With that being said, revenues and expenses for next year are
expected to remain relatively steady in the water, sewer and refuse funds with none of those
funds experiencing a rate increase. Garbage rates were last increased in 2008 with water and
sewer rates last being increased in 2011. Budgeted water revenues are set at $3,126,000 in 2016,
down from $3,159,153 (1%) in 2015. Budgeted water expenses are set at $3,974,989 in 2016,
down from $4,101,749 (3%) in 2015. Budgeted sewer revenues are set at $4,026,000 in 2016,
slightly down from $4,040,153 in 2015. Budgeted sewer expenses are set at $5,117,234 in 2016,
down from $5,518,302 (7%) in 2015. Both the water and sewer funds are seeing reduced costs
due the automatic meter reading system; a restructured department; and the solar array project
(sewer) that was all implemented by the City in 2015. Budgeted refuse revenues are set at
$1,164,500 in 2016, up from $1,148,700 (1%) in 2015. Budgeted refuse expenses are set at
$1,259,941 in 2016, down from $1,320,767 (5%) in 2015. The refuse fund is seeing reduced
costs due to the City switching garbage haulers. Budgeted storm water revenues are set at
$862,867 in 2016, up from $796,200 (8%) in 2015. Budgeted storm water expenses are set at
$867,111 in 2016, slightly down from $871,085 in 2015. The storm water fund has budgeted for
a rate increase of about 8.3%.
4
Liquor Hutch is projecting revenue to grow from $5,698,000 in 2015 to $5,871,000 in 2016. This
revenue growth is the result of a projected sales growth of 3%. Liquor Hutch is also projecting
expenses to grow from $5,713,752 in 2015 to $5,891,676 in 2016. This growth in expenses of
about 3% is due to an increase in wages and benefits and the cost of product. Creekside is
projecting revenue to decrease from $2,793,660 in 2015 to $1,701,296 in 2016, a 39% drop in
revenue. This drop in revenue is due to a lower production model that will focus on higher
margin products. The loss of revenue with a lower production model will also decrease expenses
at Creekside. The 2016 budget shows expenses coming in at $1,817,748, a decrease from the
2015 budget of $3,115,046 (42%)
The 2016 budget for the City's enterprise funds are expected to see a positive cash flow within
all funds, which should result in a growth of an already healthy fund balance for each fund.
Liquor Hutch ($475,000) and Creekside ($110,000) continue to be a valuable asset to the City
and will contribute $585,000 to the general fund in 2016. Overall, the enterprise funds are
expected to transfer $726,290 to the general fund in 2016, up from $716,290 in 2015 (1.4%).
These fund transfers continue to assist the City as a means to soften the tax burden to the
residents of Hutchinson. The City would have to raise its property taxes or lower its expenses by
over 10% to replace this revenue if these transfers did not exist.
Debt Service Funds
Debt service funds are maintained to account for the payment of principal and interest related to
debt issued by the City. Fund balances of these funds are restricted to debt service requirements
and are not available for current expenditure purposes until the debt is retired. Debt service
payments for next year will cost the City $2,598,524, a 30.6% decrease from 2015 ($3,745,611).
Revenue collected for these payments will amount to $2,942,000 of which $2,200,000 will come
from property taxes through our debt levy. Additional revenues for debt service payments come
from special assessments, interest, and construction fund transfers. Debt service related to water,
sewer, and storm water are not included within the debt service funds, but are accounted for
within those respective enterprise funds. The total long term debt of the City is currently at
$16,780,000, down from $17,940,000 in 2015.
Capital Improvement Plan
On an annual budgeting basis, the City develops a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to
assist in the financing of major capital needs of the city. The CIP is a budget document that
realistically projects city needs, outlines means by which those needs can be met, and provides
prioritization of those needs. The capital planning process provides the City with a framework to
make decisions regarding current and future city needs considering the city's financial capability.
The CIP commits the City to a long term capital plan that ensures that expenditures can be made
to add or replace capital items when needed, without significant fluctuations in the property tax
levy. Capital planning enables the City to maintain a stable property tax rate, prevents peaks and
valleys in its debt retirement program, and establishes and thereafter improves its credit rating.
The plan is based upon numerous long-range planning documents that are updated regularly by
several different committees and staff members.
Next year's five-year CIP is valued at $49,987,017, an increase of 5.5% from last year's
$47,364,233 five-year plan. The 2016 budget portion of that plan is set at $9,205,628, a decrease
of 9% from our 2015 budgeted amount. The five-year plan accounts for various investments
throughout many different levels of city government. 61 % of the five-year plan will go to
investments in the City's infrastructure system (new construction, reclaims, partial
reconstruction); 18% will be spent on park and recreation activities (new aquatic center, civic
arena, parks, etc.); 11 % will be spent on enterprise related activities (Creekside, Liquor Hutch,
water, sewer, etc.); with the remaining dollars being spent on various public works projects,
public safety and general government. In regards to the 2016 budget, 43% of the CIP will go to
pay for infrastructure projects; 30% will be spent on park and recreation and activity; and 14%
will be spent on enterprise related projects. The largest projects slated for next year include the
start of the aquatic center ($5 million over two years); a water tower reconditioning project on
Golf Course Road, various other street and infrastructure projects; and heavy equipment
upgrades to various departments. Funding for the five-year CIP will come from various sources.
The largest source will come from the revenue generated from some of our enterprise funds to
the tune of roughly 23% of the CIP. Property taxes (21%), city -issued debt (20%), State and
Federal aid/grants (19%), and special assessments (12%) make up the majority of the rest of the
funding. Probably one of the more anticipated projects for next year will be the new aquatic
center/outdoor pool. The proposed funding sources for that project will not come from any
property taxes, but from a variety of non -designated funds and reserves.
Conclusion
As with past years, developing budgets is an on-going process of balancing costs with the desired
levels of needs and wants of the community, elected officials and department directors. Having
to balance the wants of the community and sometimes their unwillingness to pay for those wants
is always a challenging aspect of the city budgeting process. Budgets that require property tax
increases are difficult for me to recommend. Excessive taxes are an impediment to economic
development and growth. Many residents will question the value of services they do not use. The
difficult part as public policy makers is helping them to understand the overall value of those
services to the community as a whole, and not as individuals. With that being said, I do not
believe the proposed tax levy is excessive and history will show that the City has always been
very conscientious when it comes to the tax burden it's willing to put on its residents. However,
the costs of "doing business" as a city does not seem to be decreasing or getting any easier.
Because of this, I believe it is appropriate to recommend a modest tax increase of roughly 1.7%
for 2016. With that being said, I am recommending that you approve the resolutions setting the
tax levies and budgets for 2016.
I would like to think that the future of the City is quite bright. The greatest relief to a City's tax
burden is growth and more importantly, growth within the commercial and industrial tax bases.
Signs are pointing to that growth occurring within the City. The City's average monthly
unemployment rate for 2015 (through November) was at 4.5%, the lowest it's been since 2006.
Our average monthly employed numbers for 2015 (through November) was at 7,184, the highest
it's been since 2008. Vacancy rates for our market rate rental units are at historic lows and our
median sales price of our residential homes have raised from their lows of $101,400 in 2012 to
$145,925 through November of 2015. Home resales in 2014 and 2015 were at levels we have not
seen since 2006 and home foreclosures (lack thereof) are at levels we have not seen since the
early to mid -2000s. We've also seen an uptick in commercial construction and new homes
construction from the down years of 2009 to 2012. While these numbers are great, we are also
starting to see some of the side effects of a very competitive job market. The EDA reported that
during the past year that between 30 to 40 high paying jobs were left vacant at our area
manufacturers due to a lack of qualified skilled workers. With the baby boom generation retiring
in large numbers over the next 3-5 years we know that the demand in town will continue to
increase for qualified skilled workers.
9
Finally, I would like to thank the department directors; more importantly finance director Andy
Reid, and the Mayor and City Council for your assistance in this budget planning process. Your
involvement in this process is valuable to the citizens of Hutchinson. With this being my first
year with the City, it was comfortable to know the depth of knowledge and the policies and
procedures that exists to make this a "well-oiled machine" in regards to the budget process. We
are blessed as a community to have those who work for us knowing the hard work they put into
their job every day. The City is well positioned to not only handle growth, but any challenges
that may present themselves in the future. I hope the information provided to you is useful in
helping you understand the 2016 Hutchinson Municipal Budget and I look forward to going
through this budget process again next year!
Sincerely,
Matthew Ja nich
City Administra or
VA
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: 5 Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP Plan)
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
Attached are the Department and Funding Source reports reflecting the 5-year (2016— 2020) Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP). The entire document, consisting of several reports and details of each project, will be placed on the City
website upon approval by City Council. The 5-year Capital Improvement Plan serves as a guide that lays out on-going
capital expenditures over the next 5 years and the potential funding sources for those expenditures. The CIP plan is
meant as a guide for Council and Management but does not give authorization for the projects until formally approved
based on purchasing authorization thresholds.
The 5-year CIP plan is a fluid document that is updated on an annual basis. Some projects get pushed back to later
years, some projects drop off and some projects move up years depending on priorities. Ultimately, the funding of
potential projects is a major factor in determining which projects within the 5-year CIP plan get completed. In addition,
the Facilities Committee, Fleet Committee and Resource Allocation Committee are instrumental in continually shaping
the priorities of several major components of the 5-year CIP.
If there are any questions ahead of time or the council would like to see further details of the 5-year CIP plan please
let me know.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve and adopt the five-year capital improvement plan.
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
2016-2020
Final Report to Council December 22, 2015
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - CAPITAL PLAN
Administrative Summary
VISIONS AND GOALS
Each year, as part of the annual budgeting process, the City of Hutchinson prepares a five-year
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that includes the following years' capital budget. The CIP
identifies projects that will support existing and projected needs in the following areas:
transportation, parks & recreation and public safety, etc. It is based upon numerous long range
planning documents that are updated regularly as identified by the Facilities Committee, Fleet
Committee, Resource Allocation Committee and City staff. The CIP prioritizes the use of
limited resources that are available for capital items by identifying which projects will be funded,
how they will be paid for and when they will be purchased. It establishes a comprehensive
development program that is used to maximize outside revenue sources and effectively plan for
the growth and maintenance of the City's infrastructure.
POLICIES
Criteria identified for inclusion of capital items in the CIP plan are as follows:
1) Capital Item must have a minimum cost of $10,000
2) Project must define year proposed
3) Funding source should be identified
4) Detail should include annual operating costs or savings for proposed capital item
5) Department priority should be established
6) Must have a useful life of three years or greater
The plan encompasses projects using the following priority levels:
Priority 1: (Urgent) Projects currently underway or those that are considered essential to the
departments of City operations, and should not be delayed beyond the year requested. Failure to fund
these projects will seriously jeopardize City's ability to provide service to the residents and/or expose the
City to a potential liability and negative legal exposure.
Priority 2: (Very Important) Projects that are needed by a department or the City to improve or
maintain their operations, and to delay would cause deterioration or further deterioration of their current
operation and/or level of service to the residents of the City. These should not be delayed beyond the
year requested.
Priority 3: (Important) Projects that are needed by a department or the City to improve or maintain
their operations, and should be done as soon as funds can reasonably be made available.
Priority 4: (Less Important) Projects, which are desirable, but needing further study.
Priority 5: (Future Consideration) Projects, which sometime in the future will need to be funded to
maintain operations, safety or infrastructure desired within the community.
CIP PROCESS
1. Finance distributes CIP forms and the prior year's data to departments for updating. Any
new capital items should be requested at this time.
2. Departments add, remove and update CIP data from the prior year's report.
3. Finance updates the CIP database with recommendations made by the department
directors and the Fleet, Facility and Resource Allocation committees.
4. Initial draft is reviewed with City Administrator and Department directors; corrections or
adjustments are made.
Preliminary CIP plan is submitted to City council by June 1st
6. Final CIP plan is reviewed and adopted by City council by year-end.
PROCESS CALENDAR
March/April - Departments work on updating CIP Plan. Any new capital items should be
requested at this time. The Facilities, Fleet and Resource Allocation Committees begin meeting
to review and prioritize potential improvement projects submitted by Departments.
May - Departments return updated CIP items. The Facilities and Fleet Committees submit a
recommended five year plan to the City Administrator. An initial CIP draft is reviewed with
Department directors and corrections or adjustments are made. Current year CIP items are
incorporated into the early stages of the budgeting process during this time frame.
June 1 st — Per Section 7.05 of the Hutchinson City Charter, the City Administrator shall submit
to the council a recommended CIP Plan no later than June 1st of each year.
December 31st - Final CIP plan is adopted by City council prior to year-end.
City of Hutchinson, MN
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - CAPITAL PLAN
2016 tinu 2020
DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
Department 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Administration
50,000
50,000
100,000
Airport
300,000
1,000,000
1,300,000
Cemetery
10,000
10,000
10,000
94,413
35,504
159,917
Civic Arena
140,000
1,095,000
370,000
1,605,000
Compost
130,000
543,000
159,227
180,000
430,000
1,442,227
Engineering
28,644
29,504
26,663
84,811
Event Center
200,000
200,000
Fire
500,000
159,000
659,000
Information Technology
82,000
54,586
18,000
154,586
Infrastructure Improvements
3,966,950
5,528,095
6,216,040
5,830,455
9,136,310
30,677,850
Library
80,000
80,000
Liquor Fund
20,000
20,000
Parks
93,000
167,314
582,500
122,500
145,000
1,110,314
Police
117,000
227,797
259,628
132,048
161,269
897,742
Pool & Recreation Building
2,500,000
2,500,000
250,000
50,000
640,000
5,940,000
Public Works
27,583
25,000
52,583
Refuse
268,178
145,374
85,000
91,500
590,052
Storm Water
20,000
20,000
118,346
195,579
20,000
373,925
Streets
483,000
278,546
45,895
365,641
71,875
1,244,957
Wastewater
198,000
31,827
339,123
402,659
531,300
1,502,909
Water
627,500
638,644
120,000
27,500
377,500
1,791,144
TOTAL 9,205,628
11,646,410
9,258,263
8,021,295
11,855,421
49,987,017
City of Hutchinson, MN
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - CAPITAL PLAN
2016 thra 2020
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Administration
Downtown Wayfnding Signage
ADMIN -1601
3
50,000
50,000
100,000
Administration Total
50,000
50,000
100,000
Airport
T -Hangar Site Preparation
AIRP 01
3
300,000
300,000
T -Hangar Construction
AIRP 02
3
1,000,000
71000,000
Airport Total
300,000
1,000,000
1,300,000
Cemeter
Cemetery mower
CEMT001
4
25,504
25,504
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe
CEMT002
3
84,413
84,413
Cemetery Fencing/Roadway
CEMT01
3
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
50,000
Cemetery Total
10,000
10,000
10,000
94,413
35,504
159,917
Civic Arena
Replace Dehumidification Units
CA -1501
2
400,000
400,000
Replace East Rink Roof
CA -1502
1
300,000
300,000
East Rink Insulation Resurface
CA -1504
2
200,000
200,000
Replace East dasher boards
CA -1505
3
170,000
170,000
West Rink low emissivity ceiling
CA -1507
2
90,000
90,000
East Rink Locker Room Improv
CA -1509
3
80,000
80,000
HVAC system upgrades
CA -1510
2
225,000
225,000
New Ice Resurfacer
CA -1601
2
140,000
140,000
Civic Arena Total
140,000
1,095,000
370,000
1,605,000
Compost
Bituminous Improvements
COW 1503
3
50,000
50,000
100,000
Bagging Line Upgrades
COW 1504
3
30,000
35,000
65,000
Truck, semi -tractor 9300
COW 1603
3
50,000
50,000
Skidsteer Loader
COW 1604
3
51,227
51,227
Grinder replacement
COW 1703
3
400,000
400,000
Mack truck (used)
COW 1704
4
58,000
58,000
Turner - Face Replacement
COW 1803
3
50,000
50,000
Mack truck (used)
COW 1804
4
58,000
58,000
Stacking Conveyor (2 used)
COW 1901
4
100,000
100,000
Walking Floor Trailer
COW 1902
4
80,000
80,000
160,000
McCloskey Screener replacement
COMP -2020
3
350,000
350,000
Compost Total
130,000
543,000
159,227
180,000
430,000
1,442,227
Engineering
1/2 ton work truck
ENGR 001
3
28,644
28,644
Department Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
1/2 ton work truck
ENGR 002
3
29,504
29,504
Replace SUV
ENGR 003
3
26,663
26,663
Engineering Total
28,644
29,504
26,663
84,811
Event Center
Event Center Carpet
EC -1901
3
200,000
200,000
Event Center Total
200,000
200,000
Fire
High Pressure Rescue Tools
FD -1601
1
32,000
32,000
New Engine/Heavy Rescue
FD -1701
3
430,000
430,000
New Command Vechicle
FD -1703
3
38,000
38,000
Exhaust Capture System
FD -1801
3
55,000
55,000
Rescue 8 - 1 ton truck
FD -1901
3
80,000
80,000
Rescue 8 - slide -in skid unit
FD -1902
3
24,000
24,000
Fire Total
500,000
159,000
659,000
Information Technology
New Minivan
lT 1501
4
24,586
24,586
Replace/Add Door Security Systems
/T 1601
3
66,000
66,000
Large Format Printer - Scanner
lT 1602
2
16,000
16,000
Generator City Center
lT 1701
4
30,000
30,000
Virtual Server Refresh
IT -1801
4
18,000
18,000
Information Technology Total
82,000
54,586
18,000
154,586
Infrastructure Improvements
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
2
6,800,000
6,800,000
South Central Trunk Storm (Pond & Ballfelds)
Newconst 07
3
968,000
968,000
SC Trunk Storm (local storm sewer)
Now const 02
3
726,000
726,000
Bluff St/Northwoods trail
Now const 04
4
544,500
544,500
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
3
1,372,745
1,372,745
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
3
1,725,400
1,725,400
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
3
237,950
237,950
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
3
264,115
264,115
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
3
251,865
251,865
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
3
1,668,205
1,668,205
Pavement Management Program
PMP
2
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000 500,000
2,500,000
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
3
1,478,015
1,478,015
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
3
750,000
750,000
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
3
250,000
250,000
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
3
616,950
616,950
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
3
308,190
308,190
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
3
154,095
154,095
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
3
308,975
308,975
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
3
156,455
156,455
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
3
111,925
111,925
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
3
318,955
318,955
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1 st Av N)
Reclaim 11
3
893,770
893,770
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
3
961,950
961,950
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
3
650,000
650,000
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
3
950,000
950,000
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
3
750,200
750,200
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
3
1,041,810
1,041,810
Department Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
2nd Ave SE Bridge
Recon 01
3
1,149,500
1,149,500
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02
3
2,018,280
Z, 018,280
Pavement sealing/Seal coating
SCFS/RP
3
250,000
250,000
250,000
750,000
Infrastructure Improvements Total
3,966,950
5,528,095
6,216,040
5,830,455
9,136,310
30,677,850
Library
Library carpet replacement
L/8-1901
3
80,000
80,000
Library Total
80,000
80,000
Li uor Fund
Security Camera System Update
LIQ -1601
3
20,000
20,000
Liquor Fund Total
20,000
20,000
Parks
Roberts Park -lighting improvements
PARK -1601
1
350,000
350,000
North Park -tennis court improv
PARK -1602
3
60,000
60,000
1/2 Ton 42 pickup
PARK -1604
3
27,000
27,000
Purchase used Bobcat MT55
PARK -1605
3
18,000
18,000
Ford F550
PARK -1606
3
45,000
45,000
John Deere tractor 4710 44
PARK -1702
3
42,314
42,314
1/2 ton 42 flatbed
PARK -1703
4
29,000
29,000
1/2 ton 44 pickup
PARK -1704
4
39,000
39,000
F350 plow truck & blade
PARK -1801
4
40,000
40,000
1/2 Ton 4X2 pickup
PARK -1802
4
27,000
27,000
1 -ton 4x2w/flat dump
PARK -1803
4
46,000
46,000
1/2 ton 42 pickup
PARK -1804
4
29,500
29,500
1/2 Ton 4X4 Pickup
PARK -1901
4
27,000
27,000
1/2 Ton 4X2 Pickup
PARK -1902
4
27,000
27,000
3/4 -ton 44 pickup
PARK -1903
4
38,500
38,500
Skid steer loader S250 used
PARK -2001
4
42,000
42,000
John Deere mower 12 wide
PARK -2002
4
73,000
73,000
Rail Line Purchase Debt (Exp 2020)
PARK -2020
3
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
150,000
Parks Total
93,000
167,314
582,500
122,500
145,000
1,110,314
Police
Squad car#2 replacement
PD -1401
2
40,314
40,314
Squad car#6 replacement
PD -1402
2
40,314
40,314
Squad Car #3 replacement
PD -1501
2
41,524
41,524
Squad Car#7 replacement
PD -1502
2
41,524
41,524
Police Special Response Vehicle
PD -1503
3
129,000
129,000
Squad car#5 replacement
PD -1601
2
38,000
42,769
80,769
Squad car#8 replacement
PD -1602
2
39,140
39,140
Civil Defense Monitoring Equipment
PD -1603
3
22,000
22,000
Police Rifle Replacement (8)
PD -1604
3
25,000
25,000
Police Pistol Replacement
PD -1605
2
32,000
32,000
Police Firearms Berm Improvement
PD -1701
3
40,000
40,000
Replace Minivan
PD -1703
4
19,657
19,657
PSAP Equipment Upgrade
PD -1801
2
179,000
179,000
Locker room remodel
PD -1901
4
75,000
75,000
New Chief vehicle
PD -1902
4
24,500
24,500
New 3/4 ton 44 crew cab pickup
PD -1903
4
24,500
24,500
SUV, Suburban 44
PD -2001
4
43,500
43,500
Department Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Police Total 117,000 227,797 259,628 132,048 161,269 897,742
Pool & Recreation Buildin
PoolANaterpark improvements
PR -1601
2
2,500,000
2,500,000
51000,000
Recreation Center Roof
PR -1701
2
250,000
250,000
Rec Center/Civic Arena Parking Lot
PR -1702
3
640,000
640,000
Rec Center Flat Roof
PR -1801
3
50,000
50,000
Pool & Recreation Building Total
2,500,000
2,500,000
250,000
50,000
640,000
5,940,000
Public Works
HATS Facility Forklift
HA TS 001
3
27,583
27,583
Water Street Garage Roof
PW -1701
3
25,000
25,000
Public Works Total
27,583
25,000
52,583
Refuse
Skidsteer Loader
REFS -1502
3
48,578
48,578
ECS Control System Upgrade
REFS -1504
3
62,100
62,100
Tipping Building Tin replacement
REFS -1505
2
50,000
50,000
Stacking Conveyor
REFS -1601
3
45,000
45,000
Maintenance Shop Upgrades
REFS -1605
4
62,500
62,500
Leaf Vacuum
REFS -1701
3
45,374
45,374
Office Building Upgrades
REFS -1702
4
50,000
50,000
Airlift Separator for plastics
REFS -1703
3
50,000
50,000
Truck, TA w/hooklift
REFS -1801
3
85,000
85,000
Walking Floor Trailer
REFS -1901
3
91,500
91,500
Refuse Total
268,178
145,374
85,000
91,500
590,052
Storm Water
Leaf Vacuum
STWT 001
3
98,346
98,346
Mechanical Street Sweeper
STWT002
3
175,579
175,579
Storm Sewer System Repairs
STWT01
3
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
100,000
Storm Water Total
20,000
20,000
118,346
195,579
20,000
373,925
Streets
1 Ton 44 w/ aerial bucket
STRT 01
3
108,000
108,000
Heavy snow blower
STRT 02
2
175,000
175,000
Snowplow truck
STRT03
3
200,000
200,000
Brush chipper
STRT04
4
31,297
31,297
Wheel Loader
STRT05
3
187,249
187,249
Wheel Loader
STRT06
3
187,249
187,249
Truck Rehabilitation
STRT07
3
60,000
60,000
1 -ton 44 truck w/ snowplow
STRT08
3
45,895
45,895
Tractor w/ 12' mower
STRT 10
3
35,453
35,453
1 -Ton flatbed truck
STRT 11
4
47,271
47,271
Tandem -axle Dump Truck
STRT 12
3
95,668
95,668
1/2 Ton 44 pickup
STRT 13
3
31,300
31,300
Pneumatic roller
STRT 14
3
40,575
40,575
Streets Total
483,000
278,546
45,895
365,641
71,875
1,244,957
Wastewater
Pumps & Generators
WWTF001
2
15,000
31,827
18,008
64,835
Department Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Minivan
WWTF 002
3
22,000
22,000
Toolcat loader
WWTF 003
3
51,000
51,000
Tractor Mower
WWTF 004
1
19,123
19,123
1 Jon truck w/plow
WWTF 005
2
38,267
38,267
Utility vehicle
WWTF 006
4
10,692
10,692
Utility vehicle
WWTF 007
4
10,692
10,692
Work truck
WWTF 008
3
31,300
31,300
Harmony Ln Lift Station
WWTF 07
4
40,000
40,000
Boiler Replacement (10)
WWTF 02
3
70,000
70,000
MBR Cassette Replacement
WWTF 03
3
250,000
250,000
Boiler Replacement (90)
WWTF 04
4
70,000
70,000
Grit Removal System (30)
WWTF 05
3
225,000
225,000
WWTF SCADA Upgrade
WWTF 06
3
100,000
100,000
Biosolids Handling
WWTF 07
3
500,000
500,000
Wastewater Total
198,000
31,827
339,123
402,659
531,300
1,502,909
Water
Pavement repairs & maintenance
W/WW07
3
27,500
27,500
27,500
82,500
1/2 ton work truck
WA TR 001
3
28,644
28,644
Water Tower Rehab -Golf Course
WA TR 01
3
600,000
600,000
Garage roof replacement
WA TR 02
3
10,000
10,000
Water Meter Replacement Program
WA TR 03
3
600,000
600,000
WATR SCADA Upgrade
WA TR 04
3
100,000
100,000
Roof& building repairs
WA TR 05
3
20,000
20,000
Well Replacement
WA TR 06
3
350,000
350,000
Water Total
627,500
638,644
120,000
27,500
377,500
1,791,144
GRAND TOTAL
9,205,628
11,646,410
9,258,263
8,021,295
11,855,421
49,987,017
City of Hutchinson, MN
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - CAPITAL PLAN
2016 thru 2020
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
Source 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Airport Construction Fund
60,000
60,000
Capital Projects Fund
102,000
70,000
209,000
30,000
30,000
441,000
Capital Projects Fund - Facilities Plan
1,095,000
685,000
475,000
995,000
3,250,000
Capital Projects Fund - Misc Infrastructure Maint
250,000
250,000
250,000
750,000
Community Improvement Fund
50,000
50,000
100,000
Compost Fund
130,000
543,000
146,727
180,000
430,000
1,429,727
Donations
4,000
4,000
Fleet - Heavy > $75K
838,000
376,249
367,330
40,575
1,622,154
Fleet - Small Fleet < $75K
139,000
280,638
298,527
359,272
284,736
1,362,173
G. O. Improvement Bonds
2,101,950
1,629,010
2,282,740
1,761,324
2,043,310
9,818,334
General Fund
68,000
30,000
18,000
116,000
General Fund (Perpetual Care Fund)
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
50,000
Grants - Federal
440,000
500,000
940,000
Grants - Other
4,000
200,000
204,000
Grants - State
1,665,000
3,400,000
5,065,000
HATS Fund (City only)
27,583
27,583
Liquor Fund
20,000
20,000
Municipal State Aid
700,000
600,000
1,100,000
1,000,000
3,400,000
Pool Project - Capital Projects Fund
800,000
800,000
Pool Project - Community Improvement Fund
1,150,000
1,150,000
Pool Project - Facilities dollars
700,000
700,000
Pool Project - General Fund Reserves
450,000
550,000
71000,000
Pool Project - Hospital funds
1,350,000
1,350,000
Refuse Fund
268,178
145,374
97,500
91,500
602,552
Rural Fire Dept Fund
227,000
52,000
279,000
Sale or Trade in of Equipment
7,000
7,000
Special Assessments
1,153,000
1,358,585
1,130,500
1,743,131
660,000
6,045,216
Storm Water Utility Fund
108,000
1,136,500
972,376
359,579
161,000
2,737,455
Wastewater Fund
411,750
293,827
556,008
697,409
1,266,050
3,225,044
Water Fund
813,750
900,644
336,885
294,750
1,084,750
3,430,779
GRAND TOTAL
9,205,628
11,646,410
9,258,263
8,021,295
11,855,421
49,907,017
City of Hutchinson, MN
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - CAPITAL PLAN
2016 tinu 2020
PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
Source Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Airport Construction Fund
T -Hangar Site Preparation AIRP 01 3 60,000 60,000
Airport Construction Fund Total 60,000 60,000
Capital Projects Fund
Rail Line Purchase Debt (Exp 2020)
PARK -2020
3
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
150,000
Civil Defense Monitoring Equipment
PD -1603
3
22,000
22,000
Police Rifle Replacement (8)
PD -1604
3
25,000
25,000
Police Pistol Replacement
PD -1605
2
25,000
25,000
Police Firearms Berm Improvement
PD -1701
3
40,000
40,000
PSAP Equipment Upgrade
PD -1801
2
179,000
179,000
Capital Projects Fund Total
102,000
70,000
209,000
30,000
30,000
441,000
Capital Projects Fund - Facilities Plan
Replace Dehumidification Units
CA -1501
2
400,000
400,000
Replace East Rink Roof
CA -1502
1
300,000
300,000
East Rink Insulation Resurface
CA -1504
2
200,000
200,000
Replace East dasher boards
CA -1505
3
170,000
170,000
West Rink low emissivity ceiling
CA -1507
2
90,000
90,000
East Rink Locker Room Improv
CA -1509
3
80,000
80,000
HVAC system upgrades
CA -1510
2
225,000
225,000
Event Center Carpet
EC -1901
3
200,000
200,000
Exhaust Capture System
FD -1801
3
55,000
55,000
Library carpet replacement
LIB -1901
3
80,000
80,000
Roberts Park -lighting improvements
PARK -1601
1
350,000
350,000
North Park -tennis court improv
PARK -1602
3
60,000
60,000
Locker room remodel
PD -1901
4
75,000
75,000
Recreation Center Roof
PR -1701
2
250,000
250,000
Rec Center/Civic Arena Parking Lot
PR -1702
3
640,000
640,000
Rec Center Flat Roof
PR -1801
3
50,000
50,000
Water Street Garage Roof
PW -1701
3
25,000
25,000
Capital Projects Fund - Facilities Plan
1,095,000
685,000
475,000
995,000
3,250,000
Total
Capital Projects Fund - Misc Infrastru�
Pavement sealing/Seal coating
SCFS/RP
3
250,000
250,000
250,000
750,000
Capital Projects Fund - Misc
250,000
250,000
250,000
750,000
Infrastructure Maint Total
(Community Improvement Fund
Source Project# Priority
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
Downtown Wayfnding Signage
ADMIN -1601
3 50,000
50,000
100,000
Community Improvement Fund Total
50,000
50,000
100,000
Compost Fund
Bituminous Improvements
COW 1503
3 50,000
50,000
100,000
Bagging Line Upgrades
COW 1504
3 30,000
35,000
65,000
Truck, semi -tractor 9300
COW 1603
3 50,000
50,000
Skidsteer Loader
COW 1604
3
51,227
51,227
Grinder replacement
COW 1703
3
400,000
400,000
Mack truck (used)
COW 1704
4
58,000
58,000
Turner- Face Replacement
COW 1803
3
37,500
37,500
Mack truck (used)
COW 1804
4
58,000
58,000
Stacking Conveyor (2 used)
COW 1901
4
100,000
100,000
Walking Floor Trailer
COW 1902
4
80,000
80,000
160,000
McCloskey Screener replacement
COMP -2020
3
350,000
350,000
Compost Fund Total
130,000
543,000
146,727
180,000
430,000
1,429,727
Donations
High Pressure Rescue Tools
FD -1601
1 4,000
4,000
Donations Total
4,000
4,000
Fleet - Heavy > S75K
New Ice Resurfacer
CA -1601
2 140,000
140,000
Tractor/Loader/Backhoe
CEMT002
3
84,413
84,413
New Engine/Heavy Rescue
FD -1701
3 215,000
215,000
Police Special Response Vehicle
PD -1503
3
129,000
129,000
1 Ton 4x4 w/ aerial bucket
STRT 07
3 108,000
108,000
Heavy snow blower
STRT 02
2 175,000
175,000
Snowplow truck
STRT03
3 200,000
200,000
Wheel Loader
STRT05
3
187,249
187,249
Wheel Loader
STRT06
3
187,249
187,249
Truck Rehabilitation
STRT07
3
60,000
60,000
Tandem -axle Dump Truck
STRT 12
3
95,668
95,668
Pneumatic roller
STRT 14
3
40,575
40,575
Fleet - Heavy > S75K Total
838,000
376,249
367,330
40,575
1,622,154
Fleet - Small Fleet < S75K
Cemetery mower
CEMT001
4
25,504
25,504
1/2 ton work truck
ENGR 007
3
28,644
28,644
1/2 ton work truck
ENGR 002
3
29,504
29,504
Replace SUV
ENGR 003
3
26,663
26,663
New Command Vechicle
FD -1703
3 38,000
38,000
Rescue 8 - 1 ton truck
FD -1901
3
40,000
40,000
Rescue 8 - slide -in skid unit
FD -1902
3
12,000
72,000
New Minivan
/T_1501
4
24,586
24,586
1/2 Ton 42 pickup
PARK -1604
3
27,000
27,000
Purchase used Bobcat MT55
PARK -1605
3 18,000
18,000
Ford F550
PARK -1606
3 45,000
45,000
John Deere tractor 4710 4x4
PARK -1702
3
42,314
42,314
Source Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
1/2 ton 42 flatbed
PARK -1703
4
29,000
29,000
1/2 ton 44 pickup
PARK -1704
4
39,000
39,000
F350 plow truck & blade
PARK -1801
4
40,000
40,000
1/2 Ton 4X2 pickup
PARK -1802
4
27,000
27,000
1 -ton 4x2w/flat dump
PARK -1803
4
46,000
46,000
1/2 ton 42 pickup
PARK -1804
4
29,500
29,500
1/2 Ton 4X4 Pickup
PARK -1901
4
27,000
27,000
1/2 Ton 4X2 Pickup
PARK -1902
4
27,000
27,000
3/4 -ton 44 pickup
PARK -1903
4
38,500
38,500
Skid steer loader S250 used
PARK -2001
4
42,000
42,000
John Deere mower 12 wide
PARK -2002
4
73,000
73,000
Squad car #2 replacement
PD -1401
2
40,314
40,314
Squad car #6 replacement
PD -1402
2
40,314
40,314
Squad Car #3 replacement
PD -1501
2
41,524
41,524
Squad Car#7 replacement
PD -1502
2
41,524
41,524
Squad car #5 replacement
PD -1601
2
38,000
42,769
80,769
Squad car #8 replacement
PD -1602
2
39,140
39,140
Replace Minivan
PD -1703
4
19,657
19,657
New Chief vehicle
PD -1902
4
24,500
24,500
New 3/4 ton 44 crew cab pickup
PD -1903
4
24,500
24,500
SUV, Suburban 44
PD -2001
4
43,500
43,500
Brush chipper
STRT04
4
31,297
31,297
1 -ton 44 truck w/ snowplow
STRT08
3
45,895
45,895
Tractor w/ 12' mower
STRT 10
3
35,453
35,453
1 -Ton flatbed truck
STRT 11
4
47,271
47,271
1/2 Ton 44 pickup
STRT 13
3
31,300
31,300
Fleet - Small Fleet < S75K Total
139,000 280,638
298,527
359,272
284,736
1,362,173
G. O. Improvement Bonds
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
2
800,000
800,000
Bluff St/Northwoods trail
New const 04
4
344,500
344,500
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
3
712,745
712,745
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
3
65,400
65,400
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
3
128,450
128,450
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
3
143,015
143,015
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
3
135,865
135,865
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
3
351,205
351,205
Pavement Management Program
PMP
2
310,000 310,000
310,000
310,000
310,000
71550,000
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
3
519,015
519,015
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
3
360,000
360,000
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
3
135,000
135,000
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
3
346,950
346,950
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
3
172,690
172,690
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
3
86,295
86,295
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
3
172,975
172,975
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
3
87,955
87,955
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
3
63,025
63,025
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
3
178,955
178,955
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1st Av N)
Reclaim 11
3
600,639
600,639
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
3
540,865
540,865
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
3
385,000
385,000
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
3
565,000
565,000
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
3
421,200
421,200
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
3
588,810
588,810
Source Project# Priority
2nd Ave SE Bridge
Recon 01 3
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02 3
G. O. Improvement Bonds Total
500,000
940,000
4,000
General Fund
High Pressure Rescue Tools
FD -1601 1
Replace/Add Door Security Systems
/T 1601 3
Large Format Printer - Scanner
lT 1602 2
Generator City Center
lT 1707
Virtual Server Refresh
/T 1807
General Fund Total
1,665,000
3,400,000
5,065,000
General Fund (Perpetual Care Fund)
Cemetery Fencing/Roadway
CEMT 01 3
General Fund (Perpetual Care Fund)
Total
27,583
20,000
Grants - Federal
T -Hangar Site Preparation
AIRP 01 3
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01 3
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02 3
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02 3
Grants - Federal Total
(Grants - Other
High Pressure Rescue Tools
FD -1601 1
Bluff St/Northwoods trail
New const 04
Grants - Other Total
(Grants - State
T -Hangar Construction
AIRP 02 3
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3 2
2nd Ave SE Bridge
Recon 01 3
Grants - State Total
HATS Fund (City only)
HATS Facility Forklift
HATS 001 3
HATS Fund (City only) Total
Liquor Fund
Security Camera System Update
LIQ -1601 3
Liquor Fund Total
Municipal State Aid
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
284,500 284,500
78,280 78,280
2,101,950 1,629,010 2,282,740 1,761,324 2,043,310 9,818,334
12,000 72,000
40,000 40,000
16,000 16,000
4 30,000 30,000
4 18,000 18,000
68,000 30,000 18,000 116,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000
4
240,000
50,000
150,000
500,000
240,000
50,000
150,000
500,000
440,000
500,000
940,000
4,000
200,000
4,000
200,000
4,000
200,000
204,000
1,000,000
665,000
3,400,000
11000,000
3,400,000
665,000
1,665,000
3,400,000
5,065,000
27,583
27,583
27,583
27,583
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
Source Project# Priority
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction New Const#3 2
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7) Partial 02 3
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts) Partial 06 3
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE) Reclaim 01 3
2nd Ave SE Bridge Recon 01 3
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson) Recon 02 3
Municipal State Aid Total
Pool Project - Capital Projects Fund
PoolNVaterpark improvements PR -1601 2
Pool Project - Capital Projects Fund
Total
Pool Project - Community Improveme
PoolNVaterpark improvements PR -1601 2
Pool Project - Community Improvement
Fund Total
Pool Project - Facilities dollars
PoolNVaterpark improvements PR -1601 2
Pool Project - Facilities dollars Total
Pool Project - General Fund Reserves
PoolNVaterpark improvements PR -1601 2
Pool Project - General Fund Reserves
Total
(Pool Project - Hospital funds
PoolNVaterpark improvements PR -1601 2
Pool Project - Hospital funds Total
Refuse Fund
Turner- Face Replacement COMP 1803 3
Skidsteer Loader REFS -1502 3 48,578
ECS Control System Upgrade REFS -1504 3 62,100
Tipping Building Tin replacement REFS -1505 2 50,000
Stacking Conveyor REFS -1601 3 45,000
Maintenance Shop Upgrades REFS -1605 4 62,500
Leaf Vacuum REFS -1701 3
Office Building Upgrades REFS -1702 4
Airlift Separator for plastics REFS -1703 3
Truck, TA w/hooklift REFS -1801 3
Walking Floor Trailer REFS -1901 3
Refuse Fund Total
(Rural Fire Dept Fund
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
1,000,000 71000,000
700,000 700,000
600,000 600,000
400,000 400,000
200,000 200,000
500,000 500,000
12,500
700,000 600,000 1,100,000 1,000,000
3,400,000
48,578
800,000
800,000
800,000
800,000
45,000
1,150,000
1,150, 000
45,374
1,150,000
11150,000
700,000
50,000
700,000
700,000
85,000
700,000
450,000
550,000
71000,000
450,000
550,000
11000,000
1,350,000
1,350,000
1,350,000
1,350,000
12,500
72,500
48,578
62,100
50,000
45,000
62,500
45,374
45,374
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
85,000
85,000
91,500
91,500
268,178 145,374 97,500 91,500 602,552
Source Project#
Priority
2016
High Pressure Rescue Tools
FD -1601
1
12,000
New Engine/Heavy Rescue
FD -1701
3
215,000
Rescue 8 - 1 ton truck
FD -1901
3
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Rescue 8 - slide -in skid unit
FD -1902
3
510,000
Rural Fire Dept Fund Total
Partial 03
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
227,000
3
3
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
72,000
3
Sale or Trade in of Equipment
Police Pistol Replacement
PD -1605
2
7,000
Sale or Trade in of Equipment Total
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
7,000
Special Assessments
2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
72, 000
215,000
40,000 40,000
12,000 72,000
52,000
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
2
Storm Water Utility Fund
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
200,000
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
3
SC Trunk Storm (local storm sewer)
410,000
3
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
3
Partial 02
510,000
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
3
3
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
72,000
3
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
3
Pavement Management Program
PMP
79,500
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
3
Reclaim 02
3 20,000
76,000
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
3
500,000
Pavement Management Program
PMP
2
150,000
150,000
150,000
150,000 150,000
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
3
344,000
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
3
250,000
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
3
83,000
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
3
185,000
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
3
93,000
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
3
46,500
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
3
93,000
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
3
47,000
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
3
33,500
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
3
96,000
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1st Av N)
Reclaim 11
3
268,131
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
3
288,585
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
3
200,000
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
3
285,000
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
3
225,000
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
3
310,000
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02
3
600,000
279,000
7,000
7,000
200,000
410,000
510,000
72,000
79,500
76,000
500,000
750,000
344,000
250,000
83,000
185,000
93,000
46,500
93,000
47,000
33,500
96,000
268,131
288,585
200,000
285,000
225,000
310,000
600,000
Special Assessments Total 1,153,000 1,358,585 1,130,500 1,743,131 660,000 6,045,216
100,000
100,000
Storm Water Utility Fund
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
2
South Central Trunk Storm (Pond & Ballfelds)
Newconst 07
3
SC Trunk Storm (local storm sewer)
New const 02
3
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
3
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
3
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
3
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
3
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
3
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
3
Pavement Management Program
PMP
2 10,000
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
3
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
3 20,000
100,000
100,000
968,000
968,000
726,000
726,000
50,000
50,000
60,000
60,000
12,500
72,500
13,900
13,900
13,500
13,500
45,000
45,000
10,000
10,000 10,000 10,000
50,000
15,000
15,000
20,000
Source Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
3
10,000
10,000
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
3
15,000
15,000
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
3
14,200
14,200
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
3
7,100
7,100
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
3
14,500
14,500
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
3
7,200
7,200
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
3
5,130
5,130
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
3
15,000
15,000
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1st Av N)
Reclaim 11
3
5,000
5,000
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
3
28,500
28,500
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
3
13,000
13,000
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
3
20,000
20,000
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
3
24,000
24,000
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
3
31,000
31,000
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02
3
80,000
80,000
Leaf Vacuum
STWT 001
3
98,346
98,346
Mechanical Street Sweeper
STWT002
3
175,579
175,579
Storm Sewer System Repairs
STWT01
3
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
100,000
Storm Water Utility Fund Total
108,000
1,136,500
972,376
359,579
161,000
2,737,455
Wastewater Fund
Replace/Add Door Security Systems
//=7601
3
13,000
13,000
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
2
650,000
650,000
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
3
75,000
75,000
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
3
120,000
120,000
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
3
12,500
72,500
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
3
13,850
13,850
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
3
13,250
13,250
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
3
86,000
86,000
Pavement Management Program
PMP
2
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
3
100,000
100,000
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
3
60,000
60,000
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
3
11,000
11,000
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
3
35,000
35,000
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
3
14,150
14,150
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
3
7,100
7,100
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
3
14,250
14,250
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
3
7,150
7,150
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
3
5,135
5,135
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
3
14,500
14,500
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1st Av N)
Reclaim 11
3
10,000
10,000
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
3
52,000
52,000
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
3
26,000
26,000
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
3
40,000
40,000
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
3
40,000
40,000
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
3
56,000
56,000
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02
3
130,000
130,000
Pavement repairs & maintenance
W/WW 07
3
13,750
13,750
13,750
41,250
Pumps & Generators
WWTF001
2
15,000
31,827
18,008
64,835
Minivan
WWTF002
3
22,000
22,000
Toolcat loader
WWTF003
3
51,000
51,000
Tractor Mower
WWTF 004
1
19,123
19,123
1 Jon truck w/plow
WWTF005
2
38,267
38,267
Utility vehicle
WWTF006
4
10,692
10,692
Source Project# Priority 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
Utility vehicle
Work truck
Harmony Ln Lift Station
Boiler Replacement (10)
MBR Cassette Replacement
Boiler Replacement (90)
Grit Removal System (30)
WWTF SCADA Upgrade
Biosolids Handling
Wastewater Fund Total
Water Fund
WWTF 007 4
WWTF 008 3
WWTF 07 4
WWTF 02 3
WWTF 03 3
WWTF 04 4
WWTF 05 3
WWTF 06 3
WWTF 07 3
Replace/Add Door Security Systems
/T 1601
TH 15/Main St Reconstruction
New Const#3
Roberts St/Rd SW (McDonald to School)
Partial 01
School Rd SW (Roberts -Hwy 7)
Partial 02
Clinton Ave SW (Harrington -Merrill)
Partial 03
Merrill St SW (SGR-Clinton)
Partial 04
Neal Ave SW (Keith -Sunset)
Partial 05
Dale St SW (SGR-Roberts)
Partial 06
Pavement Management Program
PMP
5th Ave SW/SE (Lynn Rd SW - Ontario St SE)
Reclaim 01
Madson (Dale -Lynn)
Reclaim 02
Church St SW
Reclaim 03
West Shore Dr SW
Reclaim 04
Church St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 05
Clinton Ave SW (Merrill -Lynn)
Reclaim 06
Harrington St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 07
Merrill St SW (Clinton -Linden)
Reclaim 08
Neal Ave SW (Dale -Keith)
Reclaim 09
Sunset St SW (SGR-Linden)
Reclaim 10
Hassan St SE/NE (5th Av S to 1 st Av N)
Reclaim 77
Roberts Rd SW (School -Dale)
Reclaim 12
Milwaukee Ave SW (Dale -Dead end)
Reclaim 13
Linden Ave SW (Harrington St SW -Main St S)
Reclaim 14
McDonald Dr SW (Lakewood - School)
Reclaim 15
Northwoods, Spruce, 11th Ave NE
Reclaim 16
Century Ave SE (Hwy 15 -Jefferson)
Recon 02
Pavement repairs & maintenance
W/WW 07
1/2 ton work truck
WA TR 001
Water Tower Rehab -Golf Course
WA TR 01
Garage roof replacement
WA TR 02
Water Meter Replacement Program
WA TR 03
WATR SCADA Upgrade
WA TR 04
Roof & building repairs
WA TR 05
Well Replacement
WA TR 06
10,692
10,692
31,300
31,300
40,000
40,000
70,000
70,000
250,000
250,000
70,000
70,000
225,000
225,000
100,000
100,000
500,000
500,000
411,750 293,827 556,008 697,409 1,266,050
3,225,044
3 13,000
13,000
2
650,000
650,000
3
75,000
75,000
3
120,000
120,000
3
12,500
72,500
3
13,850
13,850
3
13,250
13,250
3
86,000
86,000
2 15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
75,000
3
100,000
100,000
3 60,000
60,000
3 11,000
11,000
3 35,000
35,000
3
14,150
14,150
3
7,100
7,100
3
14,250
14,250
3
7,150
7,150
3
5,135
5,135
3
14,500
14,500
3
10,000
10,000
3
52,000
52,000
3 26,000
26,000
3 40,000
40,000
3
40,000
40,000
3
56,000
56,000
3
130,000
130,000
3 13,750
13,750
13,750
41,250
3
28,644
28,644
3 600,000
600,000
3
10,000
10,000
3
600,000
600,000
3
100,000
100,000
3
20,000
20,000
3
350,000
350,000
Water Fund Total 813,750 900,644 336,885 294,750 1,084,750 3,430,779
GRAND TOTAL 9,205,628 11,646,410 9,258,263 8,021,295 11,855,421 49,987,017
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: Consideration for Approval of City of Hutchinson Complete Streets Policy
Department: PW/Eng
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Kent Exner
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Kent Exner
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 10
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
As mentioned at a past City Council meeting, City staff has been working with staff from the Mid-Minnesota
Development Commission (MMDC) to develop a Complete Streets Policy. Please note that the development of this
policy was originally identified and initiated during the preparation of the City's 2012 Transportation Plan and further
encouraged through the recent Bicycle-Friendly Community designation efforts.
At this point, the City's Resource Allocation Committee has reviewed the draft policy and associated Complete Streets
Priority Corridors drawing (see attachments) and voiced approval of these documents. Also, the City's Pedestrian &
Bicycle Committee was allowed the opportunity to provide input, and their feedback was accounted for within the final
draft. In regards to MMDC's involvement, City staff would like to thank their staff for all the guidance and input that
was provided which came at no cost to the City.
At the City Council meeting, City staff will provide a brief overview of this policy and be available for any questions or
clarifications.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of City of Hutchinson Complete Streets Policy
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost: $ 0.00
Total City Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
December 10, 2015
A. DEFINITION
"Complete Streets" are streets and transportation corridors that are designed and operated to
enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and public
transportation users of various ages and abilities. Safe access includes user ability to move
along or across designated transportation corridors.
B. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
A Complete Streets Policy seeks to provide user accessible streets while taking into account
appropriate land use and context of the street. Users accounted for may include pedestrians,
bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. This Policy is written for City of Hutchinson elected
officials and staff to use in an interdisciplinary approach to designing and constructing
appropriate transportation projects, incorporating the needs of all users into the project.
McLeod County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation will have access to the Policy
to reference and utilize when designing road projects under their jurisdiction within in the City
of Hutchinson.
The Complete Streets concept is an initiative to design, build, and reconstruct roads that
adequately accommodate intended users of the corridor. "Intended users" may include not
only motorists, but also pedestrians, bicyclists, users of mass transit, people with disabilities,
the elderly and the young, freight providers, emergency responders, and adjacent property
owners. This concept provides guidance for appropriate accommodation(s) to be made so that
all modes of transportation may function safely and independently in current and future
conditions.
This Complete Streets Policy aims to fit local community needs and be used to direct future
transportation planning. Such a policy should incorporate community values regarding historic
and natural resources, environmental, aesthetic, and scenic concerns, as well as safety and
mobility concerns. The Policy seeks to integrate a multi -modal evaluation into best
management strategies for land use and transportation for the City's transportation corridors.
Because much of the City of Hutchinson's street infrastructure was developed during a time in
which the personal automobile dominated transportation planning practices and policies, the
City is highly auto -orientated and some areas lack adequate connections to existing amenities
and multi -modal transportation corridors. As a response to trends showing greater community
support of and desire for multi -modal transportation access, the City has made an effort to
provide a network of multi -use trails, sidewalks, and bicycle friendly routes throughout the
community. This includes provisions for pedestrians and bicyclists in Hutchinson's recent
Transportation Plan update (2012). The City plans to continue this trend of increasing
community access to multi -modal forms of transportation.
C. POLICY BENEFITS
There are many benefits to the City adopting and implementing a Complete Streets Policy.
Some of the key benefits are as follows:
1. Safety. A Complete Streets Policy recognizes the safety risks posed to road users of
multi -modal transportation corridors and seeks to address these issues by providing
adequate travelways for intended users to lessen opportunities for accidents and
increase users' sense to safety.
2. Providing options. A Complete Streets Policy seeks to accommodate the approximately
40% of Minnesotans, many of whom live in this community, who do not drive either
because they are too young, too old, cannot afford a car, have a disability, or choose not
to.
3. Health. Increasing access to alternative means of travel, especially biking and walking,
will help to encourage greater use of these forms of travel. Increased levels of walking
and biking may help reduce obesity rates and improve overall health of individuals. With
more community members becoming more physically active through walking and biking
there is the possibility of improving overall community health including lower obesity
rates while reducing health care costs.
4. Community and economic development. Studies have shown that homes in
neighborhoods with increased access to walkable corridors are valued higher and are
more desirable than similar homes in more motor -centric neighborhoods. This can be
seen in "walkability scores" that are popular measures of home value with some major
real estate agencies. Making infrastructure improvements will boost these scores and
perceptions of neighborhoods and may help to attract highly trained professional
workers to the community and local industries. Additionally, businesses in areas with
more forms of accessible transportation attract more customers.
5. Cost effectiveness. Complete Streets aims to design improvement projects with all
users in mind from the beginning. This ensures that projects are built with pedestrians,
bicyclists, and transit riders in mind the first time, rather than retrofitted after a tragedy
has occurred and when costs will most likely be much greater. Also, including amenities
for non -motorists from the beginning of a design project, rather than mid -way or near
the end of a project, may reduce the time and costs related to engineering design.
2
6. Environment. If building better alternative transportation infrastructure means more
community members choose travel by those alternatives rather than by auto, the City
may see reductions in air pollution as a result. Also, reducing the size of paved areas and
providing additional green space amenities that often accompany walking and biking
corridors reduces impervious areas and lessens their negative affect on storm water
quantity and quality.
7. Green Steps Cities program. An integral part of the Green Steps Cities Program that the
City of Hutchinson has implemented is the adoption of a Complete Streets Policy.
D. POLICY
The Complete Streets Policy of the City of Hutchinson is developed to provide guidance for its
residents, decision makers, planners, and designers. The Policy ensures the examination of new
reconstruction and major rehabilitation projects to look at ways of cost effectively improving
upon facility and amenity usability and safety for all modes of transportation. These
considerations shall take place from the very start of planning and design work of appropriate
projects.
I. VISION
The City of Hutchinson seeks to promote the basic concept that transportation corridors will be
designed and operated to be safe, reliable, efficient, integrated, connected, and accessible to all
intended transportation users, whether they are pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, or
vehicular motorists. Hutchinson's transportation projects will be designed and enhanced to
provide safe mobility and support livability and economic development goals in a cost effective
and balanced manner.
II. ALL MODES, PURPOSES AND USERS
The City of Hutchinson's transportation system will work to meet the needs of the users of
various modes of transportation. The Policy shall also account for the needs of adjacent land
owners. This policy recognizes that different users of the transportation system have different
needs. Differences include age, socio-economic status, physical ability, employment, and skill
level.
While it is likely impossible to consider and implement procedures to address the specific needs
of all users, this policy recognizes the importance of planning and designing transportation
systems for a range of modes, purposes, and users.
III. CONNECTIVITY
The City's Complete Streets Policy aim is to balance the needs of different users in an equitable
manner by creating a network of interconnected transportation systems to allow for easy and
safe access to many potential destinations within the City.
IV. JURISDICTION
The State of Minnesota Department of Transportation and Department of Natural Resources,
as well as McLeod County have jurisdiction over a number of roadways and corridors within the
City of Hutchinson. The City will continue to work closely and foster strong relationships with
these jurisdictions while remembering that this policy applies only to the transportation
systems under its jurisdiction. The City of Hutchinson will promote and encourage the state and
county to also follow this Complete Streets Policy when working on projects within the City.
V. PHASES
Because the City is fully developed with transportation and land use systems already in place,
the existing framework may limit the extent to which Complete Streets can be implemented.
Constructing a Complete Streets network will focus on new construction, reconstruction, and
major rehabilitation projects. In the beginning stages of such major transportation projects, the
City shall take into consideration the Complete Streets Policy in examining a wide variety of
improvements and amenities that may serve different users and include many modes.
While smaller scale projects do not afford as many possibilities to inject improvements into
their plans and execution, such projects will likely provide ample opportunity to make small
changes to infrastructure that may increase user access and safety. Minor rehabilitation work,
repairs, and major maintenance projects as well as operations work will be strongly encouraged
to consider implementation of Complete Streets policies. Such improvements could reduce
costs and tragedy down the line if such repairs are mandated after an accident
VI. SCOPE OF APPLICABILITY
The Complete Streets Policy will be examined as part of all city owned transportation projects.
We will also encourage the owners and operators of private transportation projects to consult
the Complete Streets Policy when constructing, reconstructing, or otherwise servicing those
projects. This is in a hope to create safer, more accessible streets throughout the entire City.
For a visual guide to the scope of applicability of the Policy, please reference Figure 1:
"Complete Streets Priority Corridors" map. This map identifies roadways where Complete
Streets implementation will be a focus. It also contains information about which streets within
Hutchinson's borders are outside of the City's jurisdiction. This map is designed to be adaptable
to circumstances as they occur. It is intended to be periodically updated by the City Engineer.
VII. EXCEPTIONS AND FLEXIBILITY
4
While Complete Streets intends to make accommodations for all modes and users of the
transportation network, it is acknowledged that it is not always possible to make such
accommodations. While the City will follow this policy, it is important to allow for exceptions
and flexibility. Exceptions are allowed in the following situations:
1. A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in
serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint
repair, or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on temporary
detour or haul routes.
2. The project involves a roadway that bicyclists and/or pedestrians are prohibited by law,
or it is determined that a project will create relatively high safety risks. When such a
case occurs, greater effort shall be made to accommodate those specified users
elsewhere, including on roadways that parallel or otherwise intersect with the affected
roadway.
3. It is determined that there is insufficient space to safely accommodate new facilities and
a parallel or nearby facility provides a reasonable level of similar accessibility to
destinations.
4. The City Engineer issues a documented exception concluding a project due to the
excessive and disproportionate cost of establishing a Complete Streets enhancement as
part of a project in relation to the anticipated number of users. There is documented
absence of current or future need.
5. The City Engineer determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost
effective because of unforeseen circumstances or significant or adverse environmental
impacts to streams, floodplains, remnants of native vegetation, wetlands, steep slopes,
historic resources or other critical areas, or due to impacts on neighboring land uses,
including impact from right of way acquisition.
The City seeks to address project -level barriers to Complete Streets implementation in ways
that still achieve an environment that is supportive to all intended users.
E. DESIGN
When designing transportation projects in Hutchinson, the City will utilize the wide variety of
design resources available, including the following:
➢ American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO)
➢ Minnesota Department of Transportation
➢ Municipal State Aid Rules—Chapter 8820
➢ Institute of Transportation Engineers
➢ American with Disabilities Act
➢ National Complete Streets Coalition
➢ Safe Routes to School
➢ Public Right -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines.
The City will generally follow accepted or adopted design standards from the sources listed
above, but will also consider innovative or non-traditional design options to fulfill this policy as
long as a comparable level of safety for users is achieved.
In implementing Complete Streets, current related city planning documents will be reviewed for
consistency. The City will either adhere to its Comprehensive Plan, including the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan, or produce written documentation of why, in particular cases, the plan cannot
be followed. Additionally, the City's policies regarding best practices for stormwater and
forestry management will be adhered to regarding planning for transportation corridors.
There are many design options and tools available for the City to utilize when implementing
Complete Streets. Each has their own unique set of benefits and disadvantages. A Complete
Streets design may include, but is not limited to the following examples:
➢ Sidewalks
➢ Multi -use trails
➢ Bike lanes, wide paved shoulders, or separated bicycle paths
➢ Comfortable and accessible public transportation stops
➢ Frequent and safe crossing opportunities
➢ Median islands
➢ Curb extensions/bump outs
➢ Narrower travel lanes/road diets
➢ Roundabouts
➢ Traffic calming improvements
➢ Roadways crossing improvements and systems
➢ Improvements to create safer and more comfortable pedestrian spaces including buffer
space, pedestrian -scaled lighting, street furniture, refuge islands, landscaping and public
art
➢ Bicycle parking facilities at public places
➢ Wayfinding signage
➢ Environmental improvements such as stormwater management, planting trees, and
adding pervious and green space.
11
This policy agrees with Minnesota Complete Streets legislation that states, "Complete Streets
should be designated in a manner that is sensitive to the local context and recognizes that the
needs vary in urban, suburban, and rural settings." This is true in Hutchinson's neighborhoods.
The City may choose to administer Complete Streets Policy differently in residential, industrial,
commercial, and mixed-use neighborhoods. Context sensitivity needs to be considered
alongside network connectivity, flexibility, innovation, and unique needs of various users.
F. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
This Policy encourages the regular gauging and reporting of implementing Complete Streets
through regular monitoring by the City Engineer.
On a more occasional basis, policy performance may be measured by determining if there is an
increased number of persons walking, bicycling, or using transit.
G. FINANCING
The City faces a tough job of maintaining and replacing its aging infrastructure at a level that is
affordable to the citizens of Hutchinson. This challenge does not mean the City cannot take a
unique opportunity to effectively and efficiently alter the City's landscape and system of
networks that Complete Streets represents. Improving the City's transportation system for all
users must be balanced with the responsible use of taxpayer's dollars.
While the inclusion of pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and other improvements adds to the expense
of capital improvement projects, the benefits of these additional improvements must be also
taken into consideration when planning projects. Some Complete Streets implementation steps
can show financial savings over the long term in addition to other benefits that are more
difficult to monetize. Community benefits include increased environmental and personal health
and safety, as well as community and economic development. The benefits are explored in
depth in section C. POLICY BENEFITS.
H. IMPLEMENTATION
Complete Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of
smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time. This policy must work together with
the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, Downtown Plans, and Capital Improvements Plan. Care
must be given that implementation steps fit under the City's overall Comprehensive Plan
concept. The City of Hutchinson may develop implementation strategies that may include
evaluating and revising manuals and practices, developing and adopting network plans,
identifying goals and targets, and tracking measures such as safety and modal shifts to gauge
success.
7
The Complete Streets Policy will become effective upon the approval of the City Council and
may be implemented through the following practices:
1. City street construction, reconstruction projects, and major rehabilitation projects shall
be reviewed by the City Engineer to determine appropriate level of Complete Streets
implementation. Appropriate changes will be made to the City's Project Development
Process, which ensures Complete Streets improvements are considered at the very
beginning of the infrastructure planning process.
2. Developing new design policies and guides for Complete Streets implementation. The
City Code may be amended to provide guidance for proper planning and
implementation of the Complete Streets Policy.
3. Seeking out and apply for grants that can be used to implement this Policy.
4. Implementing a review of feasible funding sources and adopt revisions to the Capital
Improvement Program as necessary and appropriate.
5. Working with McLeod County and the State of Minnesota to encourage incorporation of
the City's Complete Streets Policy into transportation projects under their jurisdiction.
6. Updating the City's Comprehensive Plan to include the Complete Streets Policy.
7. Educating involved staff as well as appropriate Committee members and the City
Council about best practices and cost-effective measures to design and construct
Complete Streets. The City will consider offering workshops and other training
opportunities for their engineering and planning staff.
8. Instituting a means to measure performance and success of the Complete Streets Policy.
I. ADOPTION
This Complete Streets Policy was adopted by City Council Resolution on the of
.2015.
Ej
COMPLETE STREETS PRIORITY CORRIDORS
CITY PRIORITY CORRIDORS
NON -CITY STATE & COUNTY
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: City Staff Involvement in the Development of the Dakota Rail Trail Master Plan
Department: PW/Eng
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Kent Exner
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter: Kent Exner
Reviewed by Staff ❑
New Business
Time Requested (Minutes): 5
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
As discussed at several past Resource Allocation Committee meetings, City staff has recently started to review the
potential of preparing a Dakota Rail Trail Master Plan (from the Carver/McLeod County boundary into the City of
Hutchinson) without having to compensate a consulting firm to deliver this document. This effort is necessary to
satisfy requirements of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks & Trails Commission and to allow public agencies to
apply for grants from the Legacy Parks and Trails Fund.
At their December 1st meeting, the McLeod County Board of Commissioners approved a motion 'to proceed with
development of a Master Plan for the Dakota Trail in McLeod County to be designated as a regional trail'. Based on
discussions with County representatives, it is recommended that the City Council formally authorize the involvement
of City staff (Engineering, Planning, Parks, etc.) in the development of a Dakota Rail Trail Master Plan. At this point,
City staff believes that this effort will be fairly manageable and straight-forward based on past planning efforts for this
corridor.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval of City Staff Involvement in the Development of the Dakota Rail Trail Master Plan
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost: $ 0.00
Total City Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
HRA
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, November 17, 2015, 7:00 AM
Minutes
I. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman LaVonne Hansen called the meeting to order. Members Present: Gary
Forcier, LouAnn Holmquist and Steve Jensen. Staff Present: Jean Ward and Judy Flemming.
2. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING ON OCTOBER 20, 2015
Gary Forcier moved to approve the Minutes of the regular board meeting as written. LouAnn
Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
3. FINANCIAL REPORTS
a. Steve Jensen moved to approve the City Center General Fund payments of $47,109.49 for checks
8703 to 8712. LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
b. LouAnn Holmquist moved to approve the City Center October 31, 2015 Financial Reports. Steve
Jensen seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
c. Steve Jensen moved to approve the Park Towers operating account payments of $45,182.14 for
checks 13410 to 13440 and approval of Park Towers Security Account payments of $1702.19 for
checks 1528 to 1531. LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
d. Steve Jensen moved to approve the September 2015 Park Towers financial statements. LouAnn
Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
4. PARK TOWERS UPDATE
a. Occupancy Report: Currently full.
b. Jean Ward gave the Board an update on the Elevator Project that started November 2, 2015.
c. Fire Alarm Panel Replacement:
• Friday, November 13th, a toilet overflowed and ruined the fire alarm panel. Jean and Lord had
to be on fire watch at night over the weekend.
• Gary Forcier moved to authorize Jean Ward to accept a bid up to $50,000 for the cost to replace
the fire alarm panel. LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
d. Steve Jensen moved to approve Resolution #2015-17 Deleting Items from Depreciation Report.
LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
5. CITY REVOLVING/DEFERRED HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAMS
a. FYI Update: One City Revolving Loan project is under construction. Two City Deferred Grant
applicants are income eligible and are being inspected.
b. LouAnn Holmquist moved to approve revising the approval of the Stone Rehab Loan so that the
Revolving SCDP funding (approved at the September 15, 2415 Board meeting) and/or TIF funds
can be used for the Stone City Home Improvement Loan Program contingent to the Loan Review
Committee's approval. Steve Jensen seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
6. City Downtown Rental Rehab Program
Steve Jensen moved to approve SCDP Rental Rehab Loan #2 — Second Avenue Properties contingent
to Loan Review Committee's approval. LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
November 17, 2015 Minutes Page 1 of 2
7. CONSIDERATION OF REVISED FEE SCHEDULE
Steve Jensen moved to approve the revised fee schedule. LouAnn Holmquist seconded and the motion
carried unanimously.
8. 445 ADAMS STREET
a. Jean Ward told the Board that she will need to ask for an extension from MHFA for the financing at
445 Adams. Steve Jensen moved to approve lowering the Purchase Price to $139,900. LouAnn
Holmquist seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
9. OTHER COMMUNICATIONS
a. Mayor Forcier is working on finding a new HRA Board member.
10. ADJOURNMENT
Steve Jensen moved to adjourn and LouAnn Holmquist seconded. There being no other business,
Chairman LaVonne Hansen declared the meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director
orcier, Secretary/Treasurer
November 17, 2015 Minutes Page 2 of 2
HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL ci=V�f�
Request for Board Action 79 M-W
Agenda Item: November 2015 Financial and Investment Reports
Department: Finance
LICENSE SECTION
Meeting Date: 12/22/2015
Application Complete N/A
Contact: Andy Reid
Agenda Item Type:
Presenter:
Reviewed by Staff ❑
Governance
Time Requested (Minutes): 0
License Contingency N/A
Attachments: Yes
BACKGROUND/EXPLANATION OF AGENDA ITEM:
For Council review, attached are the November Financial Reports for the general fund and enterprise funds. Also
attached is the November Investment Report.
All funds are seeing a substantial savings in fuel cost this year compared due to the drop in gas price. I am estimating
that we will use only 65-70% of our fuel budgets. The mild weather this year is also benefiting departmental budgets
with lower utility and snow removal costs.
I fully anticipate that each fund will end the year strong and will add to cash reserves with the exception of the Water
and Sewer funds. The operations for the Water and Sewer funds are beating projections but the planned capital
expenditures in the two funds are impacting cash reserves. The Water fund will show a slight reduction in cash
reserves due to the automatic meter reading project completed in 2015. The Sewer fund will have a substantial
negative cash flow due to the timing of the solar project grant proceeds. The project costs of $1.51VI have been
incurred in 2015 but the grant dollars of $958,000 aren't expected to be received until early 2016. Our 2015 budget
assumed the grant proceeds would be received in 2015. We will accrue the grant proceeds and reflect a receivable
on the books at year-end so an income statement presentation won't be impacted, only the cash flow.
Feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you.
BOARD ACTION REQUESTED:
Fiscal Impact: Funding Source:
FTE Impact: Budget Change: No
Included in current budget: No
PROJECT SECTION:
Total Project Cost:
Total City Cost: Funding Source:
Remaining Cost: $ 0.00 Funding Source:
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT YTD BALANCE
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED 1113012014
Fund 100 - General Fund
TAXES
OTHER TAXES
LICENSES & PERMITS
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
TRANSFERS -IN
FINES & FORFEITURES
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 100 -General Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
EVIOUS YEAR
2014 % BDGT
AMENDED BUDGET USED
0.00
2,316,430.84
4,491,446.00
2,175,015.16
51.57
2,295,387.29
4,491,446.00
51.11
29,433.00
228,411.89
257,500.00
29,088.11
88.70
214,810.81
245,000.00
87.68
54,023.15
343,347.65
267,900.00
(75,447.65)
128.16
280,940.20
240,000.00
117.06
7,498.19
1,231,591.59
1,225,766.00
(5,825.59)
100.48
1,137,089.15
1,094,270.00
103.91
115,296.31
1,403,230.29
2,031,070.00
627,839.71
69.09
1,422,114.30
2,045,923.00
69.51
80,522.72
510,986.25
666,225.00
155,238.75
76.70
493,863.26
646,500.00
76.39
0.00
1,153,719.50
2,160,537.00
1,006,817.50
53.40
1,124,241.00
2,066,653.00
54.40
3,753.94
40,415.45
55,000.00
14,584.55
73.48
52,955.11
50,000.00
105.91
0.00
0.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
290,527.31
7,228,133.46
11,180,444.00
517,287.54
6,659,340.90
7,491,996.00
37,642.95
555,410.46
782,636.00
142,509.09
2,045,273.30
2,310,846.00
32,834.17
269,423.52
498,116.00
0.00
192, 563.50
184, 558.00
0.00
96,850.00
96,850.00
730,273.75
290,527.31
730,273.75
(439,746.44)
9,818,861.68
7,228,133.46
9,818,861.68
(2,590,728.22)
11,365,002.00
11,180,444.00
11,365,002.00
(184,558.00)
3,952,310.54 64.65
832,655.10
88.89
227,225.54
70.97
265,572.70
88.51
228,692.48
54.09
(8,005.50)
104.34
0.00
100.00
1,546,140.32
86.40
3,952,310.54
64.65
1,546,140.32
86.40
2,406,170.22 1,403.75
7,021,401.12
6,217,395.52
697,611.92
2,044,082.51
542,954.90
20,047.52
94,030.00
9,616,122.37
7,021,401.12
9,616,122.37
(2,594,721.25)
10,879,792.00 64.54
7,009,709.00
88.70
781,887.00
89.22
2,262,536.00
90.34
533,068.00
101.85
0.00
100.00
96,000.00
97.95
10,683,200.00
90.01
10,879,792.00
64.54
10,683,200.00
90.01
196,592.00 1,319.85
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015 EVIOUS YEAR
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT YTD BALANCE 2014 % BDGT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED 1113012014 AMENDED BUDGET USED
Fund 226 - HATS Operation
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
TRANSFERS -IN
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 226 - HATS Operation:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
6,208.33
144,929.97
151,500.00
6,570.03 95.66
18,802.50
258,548.13
546,000.00
287,451.87 47.35
0.00
6,157.80
3,250.00
(2,907.80) 189.47
0.00
96,850.00
96,850.00
0.00 100.00
141,042.50
147,070.00 95.90
493,830.12
535,000.00 92.30
32,246.26
3,600.00 895.73
94,030.00
94,030.00 100.00
25,010.83
506,485.90
797,600.00
291,114.10
63.50
761,148.88
779,700.00
97.62
4,500.85
56,218.86
57,898.00
1,679.14
97.10
65,802.33
52,235.00
125.97
44,771.02
267,110.04
546,925.00
279,814.96
48.84
486,652.93
536,825.00
90.65
(5,860.21)
132,053.11
159,700.00
27,646.89
82.69
133,588.18
147,500.00
90.57
0.00
60.00
6,550.00
6,490.00
0.92
25.00
5,100.00
0.49
12,960.00
35,910.00
26,527.00
(9,383.00)
135.37
83,276.78
37,960.00
219.38
491,352.01
306,247.99
61.60
98.68
56,371.66
797,600.00
769,345.22
779,620.00
25,010.83
506,485.90
797,600.00
291,114.10
63.50
761,148.88
779,700.00
97.62
56,371.66
491,352.01
797,600.00
306,247.99
61.60
769,345.22
779,620.00
98.68
(31,360.83)
15,133.89
0.00
(15,133.89)
100.00
(8,196.34)
80.00
10,245.43
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED
Fund 601 - Water Fund
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
LOCAL SALES TAX
INVESTMENT EARNINGS
SALES
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 601 -Water Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
2,030.43
49,631.47
50,000.00
6,345.02
40,777.82
84,153.00
48,870.00
496,644.11
725,000.00
0.00
167.58
0.00
189,944.04
2,211,583.24
2,300,000.00
247,189.49
2, 798, 804.22
3,159,153.00
34,140.32
379,960.36
500,766.00
1,459.08
115,472.56
123,250.00
28,255.08
412,068.33
457,724.00
14.63
10,521.14
16,700.00
9,881.50
652,211.30
543,750.00
0.00
0.00
43,145.00
0.00
0.00
1,104,000.00
145,797.00
1,302,686.96
1,312,414.00
219,547.61
2,872,920.65
4,101,749.00
247,189.49
2, 798, 804.22
3,159,153.00
219,547.61
2,872,920.65
4,101,749.00
27,641.88
(74,116.43)
(942,596.00)
368.53
99.26
43,375.18
48.46
228,355.89
68.50
(167.58)
100.00
88,416.76
96.16
360,348.78
88.59
120,805.64
75.88
7,777.44
93.69
45,655.67
90.03
6,178.86
63.00
(108,461.30)
119.95
43,145.00
0.00
1,104,000.00
0.00
9,727.04
99.26
1,228,828.35
70.04
360,348.78
88.59
1,228,828.35
70.04
EVIOUS YEAR
YTD BALANCE 2014 % BDGT
1113012014 AMENDED BUDGET USED
48,641.07
42,500.00
3,448.10
84,192.00
529,886.12
650,000.00
0.00
0.00
2,164,886.90
2,381,500.00
2,746,862.19
3,158,192.00
347, 961.41
427, 480.00
93,027.88
124,250.00
398,947.28
409,618.00
10,252.51
22,000.00
0.00
250,000.00
0.00
43,145.00
0.00
1,105,500.00
1,043,720.15
1,229,916.00
1,893,909.23
2,746,862.19
1,893,909.23
(868,479.57) 7.86 852,952.96
3,611,909.00
3,158,192.00
3,611,909.00
114.45
4.10
81.52
0.00
90.90
86.98
81.40
74.87
97.39
46.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
84.86
52.44
86.98
52.44
(453,717.00) 187.99
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED
Fund 602 - Sewer Fund
LICENSES & PERMITS
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
LOCAL SALES TAX
SALES
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
DEBT SERVICE
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 602 - Sewer Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
0.00
6,100.00
7,000.00
0.00
3,584.08
4,000.00
1,792.35
32,332.61
101,153.00
48,870.00
496,644.12
725,000.00
286,057.67
3,075,152.81
3,203,000.00
336,720.02
3,613,813.62
4,040,153.00
44,906.19
505,473.95
679,626.00
12,469.04
169,545.65
249,300.00
45,512.97
608,373.67
762,511.00
116.22
21,612.65
24,000.00
274,205.41
1,587,529.52
691,250.00
0.00
0.00
43,145.00
0.00
0.00
1,495,000.00
128,996.00
1,508,635.10
1,573,470.00
506,205.83
4,401,170.54
5,518,302.00
336,720.02
3,613,813.62
4,040,153.00
506,205.83
4,401,170.54
5,518,302.00
(169,485.81)
(787,356.92)
(1,478,149.00)
900.00
87.14
415.92
89.60
68,820.39
31.96
228,355.88
68.50
127,847.19
96.01
426,339.38
89.45
174,152.05
74.38
79,754.35
68.01
154,137.33
79.79
2,387.35
90.05
(896,279.52)
229.66
43,145.00
0.00
1,495,000.00
0.00
64,834.90
95.88
1,117,131.46
79.76
426,339.38
89.45
1,117,131.46
79.76
EVIOUS YEAR
YTD BALANCE 2014 % BDGT
1113012014 AMENDED BUDGET USED
6,700.00
7,000.00
6,065.02
7,000.00
27,070.59
84,192.00
530,231.73
650,000.00
2,991,062.05
3,132,000.00
3,561,129.39
3,880,192.00
530,388.20
608,184.00
182,682.00
249,810.00
636,357.62
743,765.00
26,681.31
26,100.00
0.00
350,000.00
0.00
43,145.00
0.00
1,589,300.00
1,362,621.37
1,590,266.00
2,738,730.50
3,561,129.39
2,738,730.50
(690,792.08) 53.27 822,398.89
5,200,570.00
3,880,192.00
5,200,570.00
95.71
86.64
32.15
81.57
95.50
91.78
87.21
73.13
85.56
102.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
85.69
IYA1109
91.78
52.66
(1,320,378.00) 62.29
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT YTD BALANCE
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED 1113012014
Fund 603 - Refuse Fund
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
SALES
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
DEBT SERVICE
COST OF SALES
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 603 - Refuse Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
EVIOUS YEAR
2014 % BDGT
AMENDED BUDGET USED
3,811.50
9,606.02
12,500.00
2,893.98
76.85
5,857.88
12,500.00
46.86
0.00
2,234.79
2,500.00
265.21
89.39
837.39
2,500.00
33.50
95,864.63
1,049,864.31
1,133,700.00
83,835.69
92.61
1,043,751.04
1,138,287.00
91.69
1,061,705.12
92.43
1,153,287.00
91.08
99,676.13
1,148,700.00
86,994.88
1,050,446.31
5,591.76
138,122.08
179,288.00
41,165.92
77.04
153,705.05
153,350.00
100.23
1,642.73
51,742.30
65,400.00
13,657.70
79.12
60,202.49
68,500.00
87.89
58,034.10
585,418.84
702,650.00
117,231.16
83.32
607,859.17
720,873.00
84.32
467.93
3,068.05
3,250.00
181.95
94.40
2,489.96
1,250.00
199.20
0.00
75,083.49
159,418.00
84,334.51
47.10
0.00
110,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
55,000.00
55,000.00
0.00
0.00
55,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
131,500.00
131,500.00
0.00
0.00
116,100.00
0.00
1,136.00
2,138.62
24,261.00
22,122.38
8.82
1,311.92
24,260.00
5.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
720.00
0.00
100.00
855,573.38
465,193.62
64.78
66.14
66,872.52
1,320,767.00
826,288.59
1,249,333.00
99,676.13
1,061,705.12
1,148,700.00
86,994.88
92.43
1,050,446.31
1,153,287.00
91.08
66,872.52
855,573.38
1,320,767.00
465,193.62
64.78
826,288.59
1,249,333.00
66.14
32,803.61
206,131.74
(172,067.00)
(378,198.74)
119.80
224,157.72
(96,046.00)
233.39
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015 EVIOUS YEAR
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT YTD BALANCE 2014 % BDGT
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED 1113012014 AMENDED BUDGET USED
Fund 609 - Liquor Fund
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
SALES
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
DEBT SERVICE
COST OF SALES
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 609 - Liquor Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
556.32 2,838.57 3,000.00
469,707.75 5,173,854.94 5,695,000.00
161.43 94.62
521,145.06 90.85
3,274.73 3,000.00 109.16
4,978,868.45 5,395,000.00 92.29
470,264.07
5,176,693.51
5,698,000.00
521,306.49
90.85
4,982,143.18
5,398,000.00
92.30
41,510.55
472,928.03
521,408.00
48,479.97
90.70
458,102.35
502,400.00
91.18
1,830.91
16,931.90
16,600.00
(331.90)
102.00
16,585.02
15,600.00
106.31
12,823.45
173,886.09
196,793.00
22,906.91
88.36
154,381.26
186,264.00
82.88
20.00
3,919.64
5,500.00
1,580.36
71.27
3,571.99
5,500.00
64.95
22,845.00
24,164.07
27,000.00
2,835.93
89.50
31,677.02
27,000.00
117.32
0.00
0.00
465,000.00
465,000.00
0.00
0.00
450,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82,075.00
82,075.00
0.00
0.00
73,600.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
128,305.00
128,305.00
0.00
0.00
128,385.00
0.00
356,547.73
3,881,447.04
4,271,071.00
389,623.96
90.88
3,739,446.80
4,045,650.00
92.43
4,573,276.77
1,140,475.23
80.04
81.03
435,577.64
5,713,752.00
4,403,764.44
5,434,399.00
470,264.07
5,176,693.51
5,698,000.00
521,306.49
90.85
4,982,143.18
5,398,000.00
92.30
435,577.64
4,573,276.77
5,713,752.00
1,140,475.23
80.04
4,403,764.44
5,434,399.00
81.03
34,686.43
603,416.74
(15,752.00)
(619,168.74)
3,830.73
578,378.74
(36,399.00)
1,589.00
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED AVAILABLE % BDGT YTD BALANCE
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET BALANCE USED 1113012014
Fund 651 - Compost Fund
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
SALES
TOTAL Revenues
WAGES & BENEFITS
SUPPLIES
SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS -OUT
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
COST OF SALES
INVENTORY COST ADJUSTMENT
TOTAL Expenditures
Fund 651 - Compost Fund:
TOTAL REVENUES
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
EVIOUS YEAR
2014 % BDGT
AMENDED BUDGET USED
100.00
19,611.57
58,500.00
38,888.43
33.52
40,753.60
133,500.00
30.53
5,071.00
9,176.96
6,000.00
(3,176.96)
152.95
(271.38)
6,000.00
(4.52)
31,963.22
3,002,968.88
2,729,160.00
(273,808.88)
110.03
2,968,841.83
2,508,850.00
118.33
3,031,757.41
108.52
2,648,350.00
113.63
37,134.22
2,793,660.00
(238,097.41)
3,009,324.05
49,249.07
648,371.09
797,164.00
148,792.91
81.33
503,257.75
571,684.00
88.03
16,410.50
113,758.55
154,500.00
40,741.45
73.63
145,723.91
134,500.00
108.34
17,012.19
233,906.46
344,350.00
110,443.54
67.93
501,209.65
540,555.00
92.72
180.00
9,146.37
13,500.00
4,353.63
67.75
7,727.43
13,000.00
59.44
70,122.90
152,104.03
250,000.00
97,895.97
60.84
129,699.78
157,888.00
82.15
0.00
0.00
110,000.00
110,000.00
0.00
0.00
102,847.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
142,600.00
142,600.00
0.00
0.00
140,500.00
0.00
2,645.70
2,092,114.91
2,357,500.00
265,385.09
88.74
2,301,914.77
1,947,380.00
118.21
(73,005.38)
(871,420.39)
(1,054,568.00)
(183,147.61)
82.63
(1,110,064.44)
(972,802.00)
114.11
82,614.98
2,377,981.02
3,115,046.00
737,064.98
76.34
2,479,468.85
2,635,552.00
94.08
37,134.22
3,031,757.41
2,793,660.00
(238,097.41)
108.52
3,009,324.05
2,648,350.00
113.63
82,614.98
2,377,981.02
3,115,046.00
737,064.98
76.34
2,479,468.85
2,635,552.00
94.08
(45,480.76)
653,776.39
(321,386.00)
(975,162.39)
203.42
529,855.20
12,798.00
4,140.14
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PERIOD ENDING 11/30/2015
ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION
'NOTE: Available Balance 1 Pct Budget Used does not reflect amounts encumbered.
ACTIVITY FOR 2015
MONTH YTD BALANCE AMENDED
1113012015 1113012015 BUDGET
AVAILABLE
BALANCE
% BDGT
USED
YTD BALANCE
1113012014
2014
AMENDED BUDGET
EVIOUS YEAR
% BDGT
USED
Fund 652 - Storm Water Utility
LICENSES & PERMITS
205.00
4,517.00
0.00
(4,517.00)
100.00
1,780.00
0.00
100.00
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
0.00
630.01
0.00
(630.01)
100.00
0.00
1,000.00
0.00
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
150.00
5,280.89
6,000.00
719.11
88.01
3,560.36
1,250.00
284.83
SALES
66,538.06
726,408.67
790,200.00
63,791.33
91.93
667,911.49
719,500.00
92.83
TOTAL Revenues
66,893.06
736,836.57
796,200.00
59,363.43
92.54
673,251.85
721,750.00
93.28
WAGES & BENEFITS
17,295.77
136,333.75
241,318.00
104,984.25
56.50
101,289.58
208,737.00
48.52
SUPPLIES
2,197.39
18,445.67
34,175.00
15,729.33
53.97
35,814.48
33,150.00
108.04
SERVICES & CHARGES
11,336.16
124,138.13
146,350.00
22,211.87
84.82
118,908.73
146,450.00
81.19
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES
10.02
9,230.90
11,250.00
2,019.10
82.05
8,412.61
8,050.00
104.50
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
0.00
128,000.00
128,000.00
0.00
0.00
128,000.00
0.00
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE
0.00
0.00
116,000.00
116,000.00
0.00
0.00
111,200.00
0.00
DEBT SERVICE
4,917.00
149,779.65
193,992.00
44,212.35
77.21
160,149.31
193,932.00
82.58
TOTAL Expenditures
35,756.34
437,928.10
871,085.00
433,156.90
50.27
424,574.71
829,519.00
51.18
Fund 652 - Storm Water Utility:
TOTAL REVENUES
66,893.06
736,836.57
796,200.00
59,363.43
92.54
673,251.85
721,750.00
93.28
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
35,756.34
437,928.10
871,085.00
433,156.90
50.27
424,574.71
829,519.00
51.18
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
31,136.72
298,908.47
(74,885.00)
(373,793.47)
399.16
248,677.14
(107,769.00)
230.75
TOTAL REVENUES - ALL FUNDS
1,573,415.13
24,154,229.81
29,613,910.00
5,459,680.19
81.56
23,805,706.97
28,619,263.00
83.18
TOTAL EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS
2,133,220.33
25,829,064.15
32,803,303.00
6,974,238.85
78.74
23,152,203.91
30,424,102.00
76.10
NET OF REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
(559,805.20)
(1,674,834.34)
(3,189,393.00)
(1,514,558.66)
52.51
653,503.06
(1,804,839.00)
36.21
N
Executive summary
as of November 30, 2015
Asset allocation review
Value on % of
11/30/2015 ($) portfolio
A Cash
3,066,849.81
21.99
Cash
3,066,849.81
21.99
B Fixed Income
10,879,202.44
78.01
us
10,638,384.40
76.28
International
240,818.04
1.73
C Equity
0.00
0.00
D Commodities
0.00
0.00
E Non -Traditional
0.00
0.00
F Other
0.00
0.00
Total Portfolio
$13,946,052.25
100%
Balanced mutual funds are allocated in the
'Other' category
Equity sector analysis
R 0 A
Portfolio does not contain applicable holdings - exhibit
intentionally left blank.
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Expected cash flow
$ Thousands
53
44
35
27
18
9
E
0
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2015 2016 2016
0 Taxable income
Total taxable income: $214,423.47
Total expected cash flow: $214,423.47
Cash flows displayed account for known events such as maturities and mandatory puts.
Credit quality of bond holdings
Value on % of
Effective credit rating Issues 11/30/2015 ($) port.
A Aaa/AAA/AAA 6 4,853,421.78 44.56
B Aa/AA/AA 3 1,533,355.79 14.06
C A/A/A 0 0.00 0.00
D Baa/BBB/BBB
0
0.00
0.00
E Non -investment grade
0
0.00
0.00
F Certificate of deposit
20
4,492,424.87
41.38
G Not rated
0
0.00
0.00
Total
29 $10,879,202.44 100%
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 1 of 3
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
summaryIncludes all fixed-rate securities in the selected porfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass -Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.
as of November 30, 2015
Bond overview
Total quantity
10,799,000
Total market value
$10,834,291.46
Total accrued interest
$44,910.98
Total market value plus accrued interest
$10,879,202.44
Total estimated annual bond interest
$212,498.25
Average coupon
1.97%
Average current yield
1.96%
Average yield to maturity
1.63%
Average yield to worst
1.61%
Average modified duration
3.14
Average effective maturity
4.60
Credit quality of bond holdings
Value on
% of
Effective credit rating Issues 11/30/2015 ($)
port.
A Aaa/AAA/AAA 6 4,853,421.78
44.56
B Aa/AA/AA 3 1,533,355.79
14.06
C A/A/A 0 0.00 0.00
D Baa/BBB/BBB 0 0.00 0.00
E Non -investment grade
0
0.00
0.00
F Certificate of deposit
20
4,492,424.87
41.38
G Not rated
0
0.00
0.00
Total
29
$10,879,202.44
100%
Investment type allocation
Investment type
Taxable ($)
Tax-exempt /
deferred ($)
Total ($)
% of
bond
port.
Certificates of deposit
4,492,424.87
0.00
4,492,424.87
41.29
Municipals
2,017,323.01
0.00
2,017,323.01
18.54
U.S. federal agencies
4,369,454.56
0.00
4,369,454.56
40.16
Total
$10,879,202.44
$0.00
$10,879,202.44
100%
Bond maturity schedule
$ Millions
2.5
18.7% 18.4%
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2026 + Other
0 Effective maturity schedule
Cash, mutual funds and some preferred securities are not included.
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 1 of 2
UBS
n Prepared for City Hutchinson
U L`7 RP 38446 •City of Hutchinson •Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
SIncludes all fixed-rate securities in the selected porfolio. Average yields and durations exclude Structured Product, Pass -Through, Perpetual Preferred, and Foreign securities.
as of November 30, 2015
Summary of bond holdings
Maturity
Year
Issues
Quantity
Est. annual
income ($)
Current Yield to
yield (%) maturity (%)
Yield to Modified
worst (%) duration
Adjusted
cost basis ($)
Unrealized
gain/loss ($) Mkt. value ($) % of bond portfolio maturi
2015
0
0
NA
NA
NA
%
18.78/
%
18.46%
2.22%
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2016 4 865,000 8,772.50 1.01% 0.61 % 0.61 % 0.93 865,000
3,042.65 868,934.521-8.01
2017 7 1,996,000 49,308.75 2.42% 0.90 % 0.90 % 1.36 2,014,791.22
19,398.80 2,049,298.321
2018 3 736,000 9,564.00 1.30% 1.32 % 1.32 % 2.39 736,000
-723.52 737,179.411-6.79%
2019 5 1,327,000 29,145.50 2.17% 1.89 % 1.89 % 3.67 1,332,426.3
9,140.56 1,349,134.211-12.38%
2020 2 1,500,000 30,450.00 2.02% 1.94% 1.80 % 1.57 499,995
1,005,950.00 1,506,786.811-13.9%
2021 2 1,145,000 12,062.50 1.06% NA NA NA 1,144,100
-6,993.85 1,137,381.151-10.5%
2022 2 490,000 10,045.00 2.06% 2.50 % 2.50 % 6.36 490,000
-1,445.50 488,751.841_4.51
2023 2 2,000,000 44,750.00 2.24% 2.38 % 2.38 % 6.90 1,999,250
1,255.00 2,017,584.171
2024 1 500,000 13,000.00 2.69% 3.04 % 3.04 % 7.86 486,750
-3,830.00 483,967.221_446%
2025 1 240,000 5,400.00 2.25% NA NA NA 240,000
184.80 240,184.8010
2026 0 0 NA NA NA
2027 0 0 NA NA NA
2028 0 0 NA NA NA
2029 0 0 NA NA NA
2030 0 0 NA NA NA
2031 0 0 NA NA NA
2032 0 0 NA NA NA
2033 0 0 NA NA NA
2034 0 0 NA NA NA
2035 0 0 NA NA NA
2036 0 0 NA NA NA
2037 0 0 NA NA NA
2038 0 0 NA NA NA
2039 0 0 NA NA NA
2040 0 0 NA NA NA
2041 0 0 NA NA NA
2042 0 0 NA NA NA
2043 0 0 NA NA NA
2044 0 0 NA NA NA
2044+ 0 0 NA NA NA
Other 0 0 NA NA NA
Total 29 10,799,000 $212,498.25 1.96% 1.63 % 1.61 % 3.14 $9,808,312.52
$1,025,978.94 $10,879,202.44
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 1 of 7
UBS
Prepared for City Hutchinson
U RP 38446 •City of Hutchinson •Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Bond holdings - as of November 30, 2015 (continued)
Details of bond holdings
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 2 of 7
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal. g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
10,799,000
1.97%
07/05/2020 NA
$212,498.25
1.63% 3.14
$9,808,312.52
NA
$10,834,291.46
100%
Total Bond Portfolio
1.96%
1.61%
$1,025,978.94
$44,910.98
$10,879,202.44
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2016
AMERICAN EXPRESS C NY US RT
CD
145,000
1.25%
08/09/2016
1,812.50
0.42% 0.69
145,000.00
100.569
145,825.05
1.35%
01.2500% MAT 08/09/16 FIXED
1.24%
0.42%
825.05
561.13
RATE CD /NY
BMW BANK NORTH AME UT US
CD
240,000
0.95%
11/14/2016
2,280.00
0.62% 0.95
240,000.00
100.315
240,756.00
2.22%
RT 00.9500% MAT 11/14/16
0.95%
0.62%
756.00
99.95
FIXED RATE CD /UT
CAPITAL ONE BANK U VA US RT
CD
240,000
1.00%
11/14/2016
2,400.00
0.67% 0.95
240,000.00
100.315
240,756.00
2.22%
01.0000% MAT 11/14/16 FIXED
1.00%
0.67%
756.00
118.36
RATE CD /VA
FIRSTBANK P R SANT PR RT
CD
240,000
0.95%
12/12/2016
2,280.00
0.66% 1.03
240,000.00
100.294
240,705.60
2.22%
00.9500% MAT 12/12/16 FIXED
0.95%
0.66%
705.60
112.44
RATE CD /PR
Total 2016
865,000
1.01%
11/06/2016
$8,772.50
0.61% 0.93
$865,000.00
$868,042.65
8.01%
1.01%
0.61%
$3,042.65
$891.87
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2017
MASSACHUSETTS DEPT TRANS
Aa3/AA-/NR
500,000
2.41%
01/01/2017
12,040.00
1.02% 1.06
505,804.35
101.495
507,475.00
4.68%
TAX SR B RV BE/R/ 2.408
NR/NR/NR
2.37%
1.02%
1,670.65
4,983.22
010117 DTD 113011 /MA
FED FARM CREDIT BANK 04.875
Aaa/AAA/AA+
431,000
4.88%
01/17/2017
21,011.25
0.79% 1.09
443,986.87
104.590
450,782.90
4.16%
% DUE 011717 DTD 010907 FC
NR/NR/NR
4.66%
0.79%
6,796.03
7,762.49
07172007
STATE BK INDIA NY US RT
CD
248,000
2.00%
04/27/2017
4,960.00
0.85% 1.39
248,000.00
101.602
251,972.96
2.33%
02.0000% MAT 04/27/17 FIXED
1.97%
0.85%
3,972.96
462.03
RATE CD /NY
COMENITY BANK DE US RT
CD
200,000
1.15%
06/19/2017
2,300.00
1.38% 1.54
200,000.00
99.642
199,284.00
1.84%
01.1500% MAT 06/19/17 FIXED
1.15%
1.38%
-716.00
170.14
RATE JUMBO CD /DE
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 2 of 7
N
Bond holdings - as of November 30, 2015 (continued)
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Maturing 2018
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
CD
248,000
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
248,429.04
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2017
815.34
/UT
GE CAP BK UT US RT 01.7500%
CD
130,000
1.75%
08/03/2017
2,275.00
1.01% 1.65
130,000.00
101.228
131,596.40
1.21%
MAT 08/03/17 FIXED RATE CD
248,000.00
100.173
248,429.04
2.29%
1.73%
1.01%
1,596.40
162.05
1.30%
/UT
429.04
856.79
FIXED RATE CD /NY
GE CAP RETAIL BK UT US RT
CD
247,000
1.75%
08/03/2017
4,322.50
1.01% 1.64
247,000.00
101.228
250,033.16
2.31%
01.7500% MAT 08/03/17 FIXED
3,240.00
1.59%
2.79
240,000.00
1.73%
1.01%
3,033.16
MAT 10/04/18 FIXED RATE CD
1,397.41
RATE CD /UT
1.36%
1.59%
-1,581.60
230.79
/UT
SUN NATL BK NJ US RT
CD
240,000
1.00%
10/03/2017
2,400.00
0.31% 1.83
240,000.00
101.269
243,045.60
2.24%
01.0000% MAT 10/03/17 FIXED
736,000
1.30%
05/09/2018
$9,564.00
0.99%
0.31%
3,045.60
170.96
6.79%
RATE CD /NJ
1.30%
1.32%
$-723.52
$1,902.93
Total 2017
1,996,000
2.49%
04/19/2017
$49,308.75
0.90% 1.36
$2,014,791.22
$2,034,190.02 18.78%
% of
Underlying rating
2.42%
0.90%
$19,398.80
income ($)/
$15,108.30
cost basis ($)/
Effective rating/
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
Est. annual
Quantity
Adjusted
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
% of
Unreal.g/I ($)
Underlying rating
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2018
ALLY BK UT US RT 01.2500%
CD
248,000
1.25%
02/26/2018
3,100.00
1.17%
2.20
248,000.00
100.173
248,429.04
2.29%
MAT 02/26/18 FIXED RATE CD
1.25%
1.17%
429.04
815.34
/UT
GOLDMAN SACHS BK U NY US
CD
248,000
1.30%
02/26/2018
3,224.00
1.22%
2.20
248,000.00
100.173
248,429.04
2.29%
RT 01.3000% MAT 02/26/18
1.30%
1.22%
429.04
856.79
FIXED RATE CD /NY
ENERBANK UT US RT 01.3500%
CD
240,000
1.35%
10/04/2018
3,240.00
1.59%
2.79
240,000.00
99.341
238,418.40
2.20%
MAT 10/04/18 FIXED RATE CD
1.36%
1.59%
-1,581.60
230.79
/UT
Total 2018
736,000
1.30%
05/09/2018
$9,564.00
1.32%
2.39
$736,000.00
$735,276.48
6.79%
1.30%
1.32%
$-723.52
$1,902.93
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2019
RIVERSIDE CA CMNTY COLGE
Aa2/NR/AA
500,000
2.35%
08/01/2019
11,725.00
1.74%
3.48
505,426.30
102.151
510,755.00
4.71%
TAX SR B BE/R/ 2.345
NR/NR/NR
2.30%
1.74%
5,328.70
3,875.76
080119 DTD 052914 /CA
AMERICAN EXPRESS F UT US RT
CD
247,000
2.15%
11/13/2019
5,310.50
1.99%
3.77
247,000.00
100.618
248,526.46
2.29%
02.1500% MAT 11/13/19 FIXED
2.14%
1.99%
1,526.46
247.34
RATE CD /UT
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 3 of 7
N
Bond holdings - as of November 30, 2015 (continued)
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 4 of 7
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2019
CIT BK SALT LAKE C UT US RT
CD
240,000
2.10%
11/13/2019
5,040.00
1.99% 3.77
240,000.00
100.429
241,029.60
2.22%
02.1000% MAT 11/13/19 FIXED
2.09%
1.99%
1,029.60
234.74
RATE CD /UT
BARCLAYS BK DE US RT
CD
240,000
2.05%
12/17/2019
4,920.00
1.97% 3.83
240,000.00
100.302
240,724.80
2.22%
02.0500% MAT 12/17/19 FIXED
2.04%
1.97%
724.80
2,237.59
RATE CD /DE
AMERICAN EXPRESS C UT US RT
CD
100,000
2.15%
12/18/2019
2,150.00
2.01% 3.83
100,000.00
100.531
100,531.00
0.93%
02.1500% MAT 12/18/19 FIXED
2.14%
2.01%
531.00
971.92
RATE CD /UT
Total 2019
1,327,000
2.20%
10/13/2019
$29,145.50
1.89% 3.67
$1,332,426.30
$1,341,566.86
12.38%
2.17%
1.89%
$9,140.56
$7,567.35
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2020
MASS ST GO CONSOL LN TAX SR
Aa1/AA+/AA+
500,000
2.09%
05/01/2020
10,450.00
1.83% 4.20
499,995.00
101.085
505,425.00
4.67%
B BE/R/ 2.090 050120 DTD
NR/NR/NR
2.07%
1.83%
5,430.00
841.81
052814 /MA
FHLMC NTS 02.000 % DUE
NR/AAA/AA+
1,000,000
2.00%
11/25/2020 02/25/2016
20,000.00
1.99% 1 0.24
0.00
100.052
1,000,520.00
9.23%
112520 DTD 113015 FC
NR/NR/NR
100.00
2.00%
1.78%
1,000,520.00
0.00
05252016
Total 2020
1,500,000
2.03%
09/17/2020
$30,450.00
1.94% 1.57
$499,995.00
$1,505,945.00
13.90%
2.02%
1.80%
$1,005,950.00
$841.81
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal. g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2021
FNMA NTS STEP-UP 01.000 %
Aaa/AAA/AA+
900,000
1.00%
11/19/2021 05/19/2016
9,000.00
NA NA
899,100.00
99.170
892,530.00
8.24%
DUE 111921 DTD 111915 FC
NR/NR/NR
100.00
1.01%
NA
-6,570.00
275.00
05192016
MIZRAHI TEFAHOT BK CA US RT
CD
245,000
1.25%
11/30/2021 05/30/2016
3,062.50
NA NA
245,000.00
99.827
244,576.15
2.26%
01.2500% MAT 11/30/21 STEP
100.00
1.25%
NA
-423.85
0.00
RATE CD /CA
Total 2021
1,145,000
1.05%
11/22/2021
$12,062.50
NA
$1,144,100.00
$1,137,106.15
10.50%
1.06%
NA
$-6,993.85
$275.00
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 4 of 7
N
Bond holdings - as of November 30, 2015 (continued)
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 5 of 7
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2022
DISCOVER BANK DE US RT
CD
245,000
2.45%
11/18/2022
6,002.50
2.50% 6.36
245,000.00
99.702
244,269.90
2.25%
02.4500% MAT 11/18/22 FIXED
2.46%
2.50%
-730.10
197.34
RATE CD /DE
WELLS FARGO BK NA CA US RT
CD
245,000
1.65%
11/23/2022 11/23/2018
4,042.50
0 NA NA
245,000.00
99.708
244,284.60
2.25%
01.6500% MAT 11/23/22 STEP
100.00
1.65%
NA
-715.40
0.00
RATE CD /CA
Total 2022
490,000
2.05%
11/21/2022
$10,045.00
2.50% 6.36
$490,000.00
$488,554.50
4.51%
2.06%
2.50%
$-1,445.50
$197.34
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2023
FHLB BOND STEP-UP 02.000 %
Aaa/NR/AA+
750,000
2.00%
06/20/2023 12/20/2015
15,000.00
NA NA
749,250.00
100.034
750,255.00
6.92%
DUE 062023 DTD 062013 FC
NR/NR/NR
100.00
2.00%
NA
1,005.00
6,666.67
12202013
FFCB BOND 02.380 % DUE
Aaa/AAA/AA+
1,250,000
2.38%
07/24/2023
29,750.00
2.38% 6.90
1,250,000.00
100.020
1,250,250.00
11.54%
072423 DTD 072412 FC
NR/NR/NR
2.38%
2.38%
250.00
10,412.50
01242013
Total 2023
2,000,000
2.24%
07/12/2023
$44,750.00
2.38% 6.90
$1,999,250.00
$2,000,505.00
18.46%
2.24%
2.38%
$1,255.00
$17,079.17
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2024
NEW YORK CITY TRANSITION
Aa1/AAA/AAA
500,000
2.60%
11/01/2024 11/01/2022
13,000.00
3.04% 7.86
486,750.00
96.584
482,920.00
4.46%
TAX C-3 RV BE/R/ 2.600
NR/NR/NR
100.00
2.69%
3.04%
-3,830.00
1,047.22
1 10124 DTD 120412 /NY
Total 2024
500,000
2.60%
11/01/2024
$13,000.00
3.04% 7.86
$486,750.00
$482,920.00
4.46%
2.69%
3.04%
$-3,830.00
$1,047.22
Effective rating/
Est. annual
Adjusted
% of
Underlying rating
Effective Call date/
income ($)/
YTM (%)/ Modified
cost basis ($)/
Market
Mkt. value ($)/
bond
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P)
Quantity
Coupon
maturity Call price ($)
Curr. yield (%)
YTW (%) duration
Unreal.g/I ($)
price ($)
Accr. interest ($)
port.
Maturing 2025
HSBC BANK USA DE US RT
CD
240,000
2.25%
03/11/2025 03/11/2020
5,400.00
NA NA
240,000.00
100.077
240,184.80
2.22%
02.2500% MAT 03/11/25 STEP
100.00
2.25%
NA
184.80
0.00
RATE CD /DE
Total 2025
240,000
2.25%
03/11/2025
$5,400.00
NA
$240,000.00
$240,184.80
2.22%
2.25%
NA
$184.80
$0.00
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 5 of 7
4p*UBS
Bond holdings - as of November 30, 2015 (continued)
Prepared for City of Hutchinson
RP 38446 • City of Hutchinson • Business Service Account
Risk profile: Conservative
Return Objective: Current Income
Effective rating/ Est. annual
Underlying rating Effective Call date/ income ($)/ YTM (%)/ Modified
(Mdy/Fitch/S&P) Quantity Coupon maturity Call price ($) Curr. yield%) YTW%) duration
10,799,000 1.97% 07/05/2020 $212,498.251 1.63% 3.14 $9,808,312.52 NA $10,834,291.46 100%
Total Bond Portfolio 1.96% 1.61% $1,025,978.94 $44,910.98
$10,879,202.44
Adjusted % of
cost basis ($)/ Market Mkt. value ($)/ bond
Unreal. g/I price ($) Accr. interest port.
Report created on: December 01, 2015 Page 6 of 7
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
5:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The November 17, 2015 Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair
Hantge at 5:30 p.m. Members in bold were present Chair Hantge, Commissioner
Kirchoff, Geffifflissienef refl (resigned), Commissioner Norton, Commissioner
Arndt, Commissioner Wick, and Commissioner Fahey. Also present were Dan
Jochum, Planning Director, Marc Sebora, City Attorney and Kyle Dimler Planning
and Building Specialist.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2015
Motion by Commissioner Arndt, Second by Commissioner Fahey to approve.
Motion approved unanimously.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OVE 1,000 SQ. FT. IN SIZE THAT IS ALSO
A POLE BUILDING AT 1485 SOUTH GRADE RD SW INA R-1 ZONING
DISTRICT, DOUGLAS ANDERSON, APPLICANT.
Commissioner Norton read a statement outlining the process that will be followed
for the public hearing portion of the meeting.
Chair Hantge presented the application for consideration.
Dan Jochum, City Planner, addressed the Commission.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the proposed application and the requirements for the
conditional use permit due to the square footage of the proposed structure and the
proposed type of construction.
Mr. Jochum stated staff did not have any concerns with a metal accessory
building in this more rural type setting, even though it is within a residential
zoning district of the City.
Mr. Jochum noted it is Staff's understanding that the previously adopted zoning
ordinance prohibited pole buildings but the City does not have any regulations
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
November 17, 2015
Page 2
regarding the exterior roof and wall finish material. The ordinance was
established to limit the use of unappealing agricultural appearing buildings within
residential zoning districts.
Mr. Jochum stated regulating type of construction is impractical when the finish
materials are not regulated.
Commissioner Norton noted over time the aesthetics of pole buildings has
drastically improved from when the ordinance was first implemented.
Chair Hantge asked to clarify the proposed drive access to this structure.
Mr. Jochum state the proposed access would be an internal gravel drive that
would intersect the existing concrete driveway.
Doug Anderson, 1485 Southgrade Rd. SW addressed the commission. Mr.
Anderson noted the lean-to roof was his original intention but understands there is
concern regarding the lean-to portion of the structure and would like an
explanation of that.
Mr. Jochum noted that the lean-to roof was originally presumed to be within the
1,500 sq. ft. of the building. However, Mr. Anderson clarified that the enclosed
portion of the building is desired to be 1,500.
Mr. Jochum noted that the ordinance considers the entire footprint of the structure
and not simply the enclosed portion of the building.
Commissioner Fahey asked to clarify that the building Staff is recommending
approval of is the building without the lean-to.
Marc Sebora stated he concurs with Mr. Jochum's interpretation of the zoning
ordinance.
Chair Hantge asked if it would be a possibility to apply for a variance from the
square footage limitation to be able to add the proposed lean-to.
Mr. Jochum asked, Interim Building Official Kyle Dimler to clarify based upon
the building code if the lean-to would be considered part of the building.
Mr. Dimler stated because the roof line is one roof line and there are footings
required to support the roof of the lean-to, it is a part of the whole building.
Chair Hantge asked Mr. Jochum to explain what would be required to grant a
variance to exceed the 1,500 sq. ft. maximum.
Commissioner Norton stated a future possibility would be to amend the ordinance
to regulate maximum building size based upon lot size and asked for clarification
on the time line of that process.
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
November 17, 2015
Page 3
City Attorney, Marc Sebora stated the process would be slightly longer than the
process to apply for a variance.
Motion by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Norton to close
hearing at 6:03 p.m.
Commissioner Fahey moved to approve with staff recommendations, seconded by
Commissioner Kirchoff. Motion approved unanimously.
This item will be on the consent agenda at the Tuesday, January 19, 2015 City
Council meeting at 5:30 p.m.
Motion to close hearing — Motion to approve with staff recommendations — Motion to reject
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NONE
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. DISCUSSION REGARDING APPROPRIATE LOCATION FOR MICRO
DISTILLERIES AND COCKTAIL LOUNGES.
City Attorney, Marc Sebora addressed the Commission.
Mr. Sebora shared the City Council desired the Planning Commission to review
appropriate zoning districts for micro -distilleries and cocktail lounges as the
Council recently approved the licensing of such facilities.
Mr. Sebora stated that unlike breweries there is no distinction between large and
small. A micro -distillery is one that produces less than 40,000 of spirits.
Commissoner Kirchoff noted often these micro -distilleries favor being accessible
by food vendors.
Dan Jochum, City Planner, noted perhaps the 40,000 gallons could be the
distinguishing point between being located in a Commercial zoning district and
being located in an Industrial zoning district.
Mr. Sebora noted an applicant is only permitted to have a cocktail room if the
applicant is a micro -distillery.
Mr. Jochum noted it would be logical to mirror the zoning district thresholds of
the micro -brewery ordinance.
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
November 17, 2015
Page 4
B. DISCUSSION REGARDING ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SIZE LIMITS IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.
Mr. Jochum noted that regardless of the limit imposed, there is likely to always be an
applicant that desires to exceed the limit.
Commissioner Norton stated he believes it would be appropriate to have a ratio
developed for building size based upon lot size.
Mr. Jochum asked the Commission if they had a recommendation of a maximum
accessory structure size regardless of lot size.
Mr. Jochum shared that it becomes difficult for staff to enforce a subjectively worded
ordinance.
Chair Hantge asked Mr. Jochum to research and draft some proposed language for a
maximum size and a possible ratio based upon lot.
7. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
A. Upcoming Meetings
Mr. Jochum noted there will be a Planning Commission meeting in December as
there is currently an application for a C.U.P. for a pole -type building.
Mr. Jochum also noted there is a vacation of a right-of-way and a possible site
plan review to be heard at the December Planning Commission meeting.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Arndt, Second by Commissioner Norton to adjourn the meeting
at 6:25 p.m.