The URL can be used to link to this page

cp07-28-1981 cHUTCHINSON CITY CALENDAR WEEK OF JULY 26 TO AUGUST 1 1981 WEDNESDAY -29- 8:00 p.m. Joint Airport Meeting at Litchfield Civic Arena SUNDAY -26- THURSDAY -30- 7:00 a.m. City Council meets with Directors 8:00 a.m. City Council meets with Dept. Heads MONDAY -27= Noon - Hutchinson Safety Counci 2:00 p.m. Open Bids for Sale of Old Armory 2 :00 p.m. Utilities Commission FRIDAY -31 - VACATIONS: Ralph Neumann (30th -31st) TUESDAY -28- 2:00 p.m. Open Insurance Bids 17:30 p.m. City Council Nee SATURDAY -1- 1 1 i i • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1981 1. Call Meeting to Order - 7:30 p.m. 2. Invocation - Reverend James P. Lauer ,/3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of July 14 and Special Meeting of July 13 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to approve as amended 4. Public Hearing None 5. Communications, Requests and Petitions ✓(a) Consideration of Request for Reduced Trash and Refuse Rates by Emily E. Johnson Action - Motion to approve request - Motion to reject 6. Resolutions and Ordinances (a) (ITEM DELETED) �(b) Consideration of Ordinance No. 11/81 - An Ordinance to Vacate an Alley in Block 52 of the S.1 /2 of City Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt ,/(c) Consideration of Ordinance No. - -9/81 - An Ordinance Amending Section 520 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled Building Permit Fees (DEFERRED 7- 14 -81) Action - Motion to reject -- Motion to waive first reading and set second reading for August 11, 1981 VI(d) Consideration of Resolutions Relative to Establishing a City Garage Fund (1) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Approve Resolution No. 6881 Establishing City Garage Fund (2) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Approve Resolution No. 6882 Authorizing Transfer of Automotive Equipment to Central Garage Fund (3) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Approve Resolution No. 6883 Transferring $5,000 from the General Fund to the Central Garage Fund (4) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Approve Resolution No. 6884 Clearing and Closing the Bridge Fund Balance to the Central Garage Fund. • 11 COUNCIL AGENDA JULY 28, 1981 7. Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions ✓(a) Minutes of Nursing Home Board dated June 18, 1981 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing ,/ b) Minutes of Hutchinson Safety Council dated June 29, 1981 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing , (c) Minutes of Planning Commission dated June 16, 1981 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing 8. Unfinished Business A a) Consideration of Request Submitted by Richard Schmidtbauer for Preliminary Plat for Schmidtbauer's Second Addition with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Adopt Resolution /b) Consideration of Preliminary Plat Submitted by Richard Larson for Kimberly's Country Estates with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to Adopt Resolution 9. New Business a) Consideration of Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuance of service „/(b) Consideration of request for Conditional Use Permit submitted by Robert L. Miley with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution Ac) Consideration of request for a variance submitted by Geoffrey Docken with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action = Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution ✓(d) Consideration of sign variance submitted by "Prairie House, Inc." with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution -2- COUNCIL AGENDA JULY,28, 1981 ✓(e) Consideration of request for variance submitted by Angela Amundson with unfavorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution ✓(f) Consideration of request submitted by Richard Larson for preliminary plat of Kimberly's Country Estates with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution (g) Consideration of request submitted by Richard Schmidtbauer for preliminary plat for Schmidtbauer's Second Addition with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution �(h) Consideration of revising the park contribution schedule amending zoning Ordinance #464 with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - motion to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second reading for August 11, 1981 J(i) Consideration of Proposed Sign Changes Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second reading for Agjgust 11, 1981 Jj) Consideration of approval of installation of circle drive under conditional use permit for June Redman with favorable recommendation of Director of Engineering Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject -//(k) Consideration of Appointment to HHRA Board Action - Appointment by Mayor d(1) Consideration of establishing a bid opening date of August 20 at 2:00 p.m. for fire station facility Action - Motion to approve ✓(m) Consideration of authorization to'enter into shade tree contract Action - Motion to approve contract - Motion to reject -3- COUNCIL AGENDA JULY ?8, 1981 10. Miscellaneous �(a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments v/(a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Ad j ournment -4- le .1 0 0 AGENDA ADDITION REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1981 V6. Consideration of Minutes - Special Meeting of July 27, 1981 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to approve as amended 6. Resolutions and Ordinances v(e) Resolution No. 6913 - Transferring $10,000 from Liquor Store to General Fund Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt ,/(f) Ordinance No-14/81 - Ordinance Amending Section 715:20 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled "No Parking Areas" By Adding Sub- division No. 9 Thereto, Relative to "Parking, Local Regualtions" Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt 7. Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions V(d) Minutes of Tree Board dated June 17, 1981 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing ./(e) Monthly Financial Report - June 1981 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing 8. Unfinished Business ✓(c) Consideration of Assessment Roll No. 92 (DEFERRED JULY 14, 1981) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution ✓(d) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Old Armory Property (DEFERRED JULY 27, 1981) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to award bid v/(e) Consideration of Awarding Bid(s) for Group Health and Life I M urance (DEFERRED JULY 28, 1981) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to award bid(s) 9. New Business ,,/(i) Delete from Agenda (See Item 6 -f) J(n) Consideration of Construction of Four Manholes In Pishney Lane Area Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve if - 6 0 COUNCIL AGENDA ADDITION JULY 28, 1981 ✓(o) Consideration of Request by Farmers Elevator to Haul 80,000 Pound Loads of Grain on Arch and Michigan Street to Highway 7 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request „/(p) Consideration of Request by Farmers Elevator for Street Lights on South End of Michigan and East Side along Arch to Farmers Elevator Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to Hutchinson Utilities *�q) Consideration of 1980 Assessment Rolls No. 111 -124 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to set public hearing for August 25, 1981 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions -2- i r MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JULY-13, 1981 The special meeting of the Hutchinson City Council was called to order by Mayor Westlund at 7:30 a.m. on Monday, July 13, 1981. Council members present were Mayor Westlund, Aldermen Gruenhagen, Beatty, Lueneburg. Absent was Alderman B. Peterson. City Administrator Plotz was also in attendance. The City Council discussed the purchase of the building commonly known as the Wigen Building located at First Avenue Southwest. It was noted that an appraisal has been completed on the property showing a current market value of $101,340. The property would have a proposed use of public parking, pursuant to the Hutchinson Downtown Parking Plan. It was noted that the Hutchinson Parking Advisory Committee included this parcel as a high priority for acquisition. Mayor Westlund stated that he has been in contact with the Citizens Bank, the present owner, which is willing to sell at the appraised price. One of the conditions of the sale is that in the event the City changes the use of the property from public parking to any other use, the bank would be-offered the opportunity to repurchase the property at the current market value. The terms and conditions of the proposed supplemental agreement were reviewed by the Mayor. There was a motion by Ken Gruenhagen, seconded by Ted Beatty to purchase the property,(described as follows) including supplemental agreement. [Lot 6, except the West 62.70 feet thereof, and Lot 7, except the West 62.70 feet of the South 4.00 feet thereof, all in Block 8 in the South Half, City of Hutchinson.] Motion was carried unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00 a.m. 3. k • • MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 14, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor Westlund at 7:30 P.M., with the following members present: Aldermen Gruenhagen, Lueneburg and Beatty, in addition to Mayor Westlund. Absent: Alderman Peterson. Also present: City Engineer Priebe, Assistant City Attorney Schaefer and City Administrator Plotz. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend James P. Lauer of Peace Lutheran Church. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the Special Meeting of June 15, 1981, Regular Meeting of June 23, 1981, and Special Meetings of June 30 and July 1, 1981 were approved as read upon motion by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARING None 5. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) ITEM DELETED FROM AGENDA (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY MCLEOD COUNTY LIVESTOCK EXHIBITORS ASSOCIATION FOR "ON SALE" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR AUGUST 13, 1981 After discussion, on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and carried unanimously, the request was approved. (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PERMIT TO DISTRIBUTE AND SELL JOURNALS DOOR TO DOOR The Minnesota Conference of Seventh Day Adventists requested a permit to distribute and sell journals concerning drugs, alcohol and smoking, door to door in Hutchinson. Two local (rural) residents will distribute the materials. Mayor Westlund asked if the Ministerial Association had any comment on the request. Pastor James Lauer responded, no comment. On a motion by Alderman Gruenhagen, seconded by Alderman Beatty, carried unanimously, the request was approved. 3 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY,14, 1981 (d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR "ON- SALE" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR JULY 23, 1981 The Elks Club requested a permit to sell non - intoxicating malt liquor at the Oak Ridge Boys concert at the Civic Arena. Police Chief O'Borsky recommended that beer not be sold one -half hour before the first show ends nor between performances to facilitate movement of people out of the building quickly; also, no beer taken out, and plastic cups only to be used. After discussion, a motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen to approve the request with the stipulations as noted by Chief O'Borsky. Motion ar was seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried,-with Alderman Beatty votg "nay. (e) CONSIDERATION OF LETTER OF RESIGNATION FROM ALDERMAN BRUCE PETERSON Mayor Westlund read a letter of resignation which had been received from Alderman Bruce Peterson just prior to the Council meeting. Alderman Peterson wrote that he has appreciated the opportunity to serve on the City Council for the past five years and hopes he has contributed something to the progress of the community over this time. He further wrote that time constraints and job growth in his present employment make it necessary to resign from the City Council effective Friday, July 17, 1981. Alderman Beatty made a motion to accept the resignation with regret and authorize Resolution of Appreciation. Seconded by Lueneburg, carried unanimously, (f) PRESENTATION BY JON. GEISS,PRESIDENT OF HUTCHINSON INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION Jon Geiss, President of Hutchinson Industrial Corporation appeared before the City Council to present information on the status of the chemical dumpsite used by Hutchinson Industrial Corporation in the early 1970's. He requested the--support and counsel of the City Council in resolving the situation. Mr. Geiss stated that from 1971 to 1974 Hutchinson Industrial Corporation disposed of about 13,000 gallons of waste chemicals in an abandoned gravel pit two miles south of Hutchinson on County Road 25, about 12 mile west of Highway 22, on property owned by Harold Molls. This procedure was standard industrial practice at the time, approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. In 1974, technologies became available to dispose of waste in other ways and the dumping practice was discontinued. Present waste disposal is accomplished in compliance with EPA and MPCA regulations. The location and nature of the disposal site was voluntarily disclosed to MPCA in April, 1981 and testing and cleanup procedures were initiated. In June, 1981, MPCA made a press release concerning the situation, giving no opportunity for prior briefing of local officials. Hutchinson Industrial Corporation has made arrangements with the present landowner, Mr. McCormick, to test the soil and plans to test well water within a one -mile radius of 0 -2- 0 'COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 the site. Hutchinson Industrial Corporation takes responsibility for the situation and will keep Hassan Valley Township officials informed. After brief questioning for further details by members of the City Council, Mayor Westlund thanked Mr. Geiss for presenting the report and for assuming responsibility for resolving the problem. 6. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION NO. 6877 - ACCEPTING $62,500 FROM THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMM. After discussion, on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, Resolution No. 6877 transferring $62,500 from Hutchinson Utilities Commission to the General Fund was unanimously adopted. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 11/81 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE AN ALLEY IN BLOCK 52 of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE CITY (ITEM TABLED PENDING COMMUNICATION FROM PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH) (c) ORDINANCE NO. 9/81 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 520 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED BUILDING PERMIT FEES (DEFERRED JUNE 23, 1981) City Engineer Priebe reported that alternate methods of changing the permit fee would be to change to the Uniform Building Code Schedule of fees at this time, or to make the increase in two equal steps, one now and one a year from now. DuWayne Dickey commented from the audience that he objects to raising building permit fees and questions whether fees should be expected to pay the whole cost of operating the building department. After further discussion by the City Council, Alderman Gruenhagen made a motion to reject a building fee increase at this time. The motion died for lack of a second. Alderman Beatty made a motion to waive first reading of the two step increase recommendation and set second reading for July 28, 1981. The motion died for the lack of a second. Alderman Lueneburg made a motion to increase fees in the amount of 30 percent of the difference between the present schedule and the new schedule. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously carried. (d) RESOLUTION NO. 6878 - TRANSFER OF GENERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR SUPPORT OF HUTCHINSON GENERAL FUND After discussion, Alderman Beatty made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 6878, Transfer of General Revenue Sharing Funds for Support of -3- COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 Hutchinson General Fund, in the amount of $87,947. Motion was seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously. (e) ORDINANCE NO. 12/81 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 730:00 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION Police Chief O'Borsky provided information recommending a change in City Ordinance for unreasonable acceleration, from a Misdemeanor to a Petty Misdemeanor. This would assist the police department in dealing with the violation and related court appearances. Judge Yost is in agreement with the changes. After discussion, Alderman Lueneburg made a motion to waive second reading and adopt the Ordinance. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty -and carried unanimously. (f) ORDINANCE NO. 13/81 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 8 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP. After discussion, Alderman Gruenhagen made a motion to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 13/81. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and carrued unanimously. (g) RESOLUTION NO. 6879 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE Resolution No. 6879 for Purchase of equipment was approved, on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and carried unanimously. 7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (a) BUILDING OFFICIAL'S MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1981 There being no discussion, the report was ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (b) MINUTES - PARK AND RECREATION BOARD DATED JUNE 3, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (c) MINUTES - SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER ADVISORY BOARD DATED JUNE 2, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (d) MINUTES OF HOSPITAL BOARD DATED MAY 19, 1981 There being no discussion, be received for filing. the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to -4- • -COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 (e) MINUTES OF LIBRARY BOARD DATED JUNE 25, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 92 (DEFERRED JUNE 30, 1981) A memorandum from City Engineer Priebe to Assistant City Attorney Schaefer was distributed to the Council, along with a map with elevations relating to the lateral storm sewer serving Clifton Heights. It is the Engineer's recommendation that the storm sewer project be reduced to serve only Clifton Heights for the present, due to the objections of Kables Furniture, Velvet Coach and 7 Hi Motel, which are presently served by a private drainage system. John Mlinar of Clifton Heights commented from the audience that drainage is needed in the area and questioned the elevations in the plan. Lee Stritesky of Clifton Heights asked for further consideration of this change. Mayor Westlund commented that he believes further study of this project is needed and that it should be referred back to Engineer Priebe. On a motion by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Beatty, carried unanimously, the matter was tabled. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF TWO NEW TRUCKS FOR MOTOR POOL Ralph Neumann, Director of Maintenance Operations, requested that specifications be prepared and bids advertised for one pickup truck and one one -ton truck, which are budgeted replacement items for the Motor Pool. Alderman Lueneburg made a motion to approve the request. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING IBM COMPUTER IN PLACE AT HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL. Communication from Hospital Administrator Graves stated that the option exists to purchase IBM System 34 computer equipment which has been rented for two years, with rental credits applicable to the purchase. It would be advantageous to exercise the'buy -out option at this time, since the equipment has worked extremely well and further rental payments would not apply to the $22,941 buy -out price. The Hospital Governing Board is in favor of the purchase. On a motion by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen, the request was unanimously approved. -5- COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 (c) CONSIDERATION OF HYDRANT AND CURB ALIGNMENT ON EAST SIDE OF T. H. 15 NORTH OF 5TH AVE NE City Engineer Priebe recommended realigning the fire hydrant and curb on the east side of T.H. 15 (Main Street) immediately north of 5th Avenue N.E. as a safety improvement necessary due to the street widening presently being done at that intersection by the state. Cost to the City would be $1,127.00. After discussion, Alderman Gruenhagen made a motion to approve work. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF MERIT INCREASES FOR EMPLOYEES rr Personnel Coordinator Sitz reported that performance reviews for employees have been completed. Most employees have been recommended for one step, one -half step, or zero changes in rate. Exceptions to this are two recommendations for reclassification, namely Wastewater Plant Operator to IV -3/8 range with one step increase Finance Clerk to III -3/8 range with one step increase In addition, due to reclassification in the 1981 Pay Plan, two employees are being recommended by department heads for two step increases, namely, Secretary, Parks and Recreation to II -4 Secretary, Engineering /Insp. to II -6. After discussion Alderman Beatty moved to approve the increases for July. Motion was seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED SIGN CHANGES Police Chief O'Borsky recommended changes in allowed parking at Fair Avenue to alleviate congestion at Fair Avenue and Adams Street during the county- -fair and at 3M shift changes. No parking would be allowed on the north side of Fair Avenue near Adams Street and a right turn lane would be marked instead. , After discussion, Alderman Beatty moved to waive first reading of the Ordinance and set second reading for July 28, 1981. Alderman Gruenhagen seconded the motion which was carried unanimously. (f) DISCUSSION OF JOINT HUTCHINSON - LITCHFIELD AIRPORT At 8:00 P.M. Mayor Westlund moved the Council meeting to the upstairs meeting room in order to accommodate the approximately 125 people who had an interest in the airport topic. Mayor Westlund then introduced the discussion with a summary of efforts to date. He stated that the City of Litchfield had asked for consideration of a joint airport and that as a result of this, a Joint Airport Commission has been studying the question for the past five months. This Commission has now asked the two City Councils to consider four items in order to • 0 -6- - COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 determine whether to continue at this time to form a joint powers agreement. The matters which such a joint powers agreement would address are (1) Site Selection (2) Appraisal (3) Property Negotiation (4) Exercise of Eminent Domain Mayor Westlund then introduced Consultant Richard Beckman of Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, who has been working with the City of Litchfield,and asked him to summarize the status of the airport. Mr. Beckman reported that the Litchfield airport has serious deficiencies as shown in a 1980 study. In February, 1981, Litchfield tabled their study to proceed with the joint airport study. The advantages of a joint airport are that half as much land would have to be provided by each city and the costs would be shared; based craft (30 from Litchfield, 15 from Hutchinson) would be combined in one location, giving a fixed base operator a better potential for a successful operation. Presently, Litchfield has the required amount of traffic to justify the larger facility, while Hutchinson alone does not. It is customary for communities to provide incentives to attract and keep business and industry, as an airport would do. Studies show direct and indirect income to communities from airports although there are no hard numbers to prove that industry is attracted by airports. A new airport would provide the desirable low- density population safety zone. Mr. Beckman summarized the disadvantages of a joint airport; one of them being unpopularity. Others are displacement of property owners, increased noise level, and the loss of wildlife. For the City of Hutchinson, proceeding could cost more than doing nothing. Only four cities in the state plan to keep their present 3,200 foot runways at the present length; most cities have plans to lengthen runways in the future. Mr. Beckman concluded that Litchfield must improve their airport. Their City Council favors relocation; if to a joint facility, then sites 2,3,4, or 6 are most probable choices. If Litchfield builds alone, favored sites are near Johnson Brothers property or at the VOR. If Litchfield bdilds alone at a site within a 30- minute drive from Hutchinson, this will make Hutchinson ineligible for federal money for any future airport. Mayor Westlund stated there would be a cost to Hutchinson of $200,000 or $300,000 if a joint facility were built. In 1980, our present airport had revenues of $57,000 and expenses of $69,000. He then called for comments from the floor. Gary Hoff Presented a petition with 740 to 750 signatures gathered in the City of Hutchinson during the past few days, asking the'City Council not to enter into a joint airport agreement with the City of Litchfield. -7- COUNCIL_ MINUTES JULY, 14, 1981 Jerome Waters Meeker County Commissioner 5th District - Cedar Mills Mr. Hoff commented that noise reduction is needed. At site 6, the residence is very close. Is it really feasible that an airport will bring industry? He has heard the City of Hutchinson has options on property so the present airport could extend to 4,000 feet. Is this true? One cannot compare the local situation to Austin and Duluth airports. More than 6 families would be affected by a joint airport. Is a pilot. Meeker County Commissioners' feel the use figures for the Litchfield airport are optimistic. Meeker County Board has informed E Litchfield they want no part of the airport. Industry is kept out by the Minnesota tax climate, not by lack of an airport. If a site is chosen, he will ask for an environmental impact statement. Mayor Westlund then called on Larry Wendorff, a McLeod County Commissioner who was also in the audience and asked for his comments. Larry Wendorff Does not believe the joint airport is needed. If 3M had requested it, heimight feel differently. J. Harold Beytien Asked how far Litchfield is from Willmar. Richard Beckman More than the 30 minute driving limit. J. Harold Beytien Hates to see Hutchinson losing its airport. It could expand to 4,000 ft. Mayor Westlund then called on Consultant Beckman for specific comments•on noise. Mr. Beckman stated that federal standards define what is a noise problem. - -Noise levels might increase and yet not be defined as a problem. Jerome Waters The source of federal money is the taxpayer. Mayor Westlund called on City Administrator Plotz for comment on any options to buy additional land at the Hutchinson Airport site. Mr. Plotz stated that at present the City of Hutchinson owns 257 acres at the airport and has no options on any other land. Perhaps there has been confusion with a contract for deed, which the City does have. In further response to Mayor Westlund: Richard Beckman A 4,000 foot runway at Litchfield is the longest they can go. Jim Schaefer If there were a joint powers contract and if neither Assistant City Attorney side takes action, the contract would be dissolvable. -8- 0 COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 • Richard Beckman The acquisition procedure is for appraisal and then - acquisition. The state appraises, and a landowner can request a second appraisal. At that time, hopefully a price can be agreed upon. If a selling price is not agreed, the cities could further negotiate a price, but federal money would not pay anything above the appraised value. Chuck Warner Asked for more information on a joint powers agreement. Is "divorce" possible once underway? Jim Schaefer There would be the possibility of a lawsuit if such an agreement were broken. Richard Beckman Litchfield does not want to go through a long process and then have the agreement dissolve. At this point, Mayor Westlund stated that no more than 30 minutes longer would be used for comments from the floor. Gerry Wright Speaks for the pilots at the Hutch airport. Hutchinson can expand to 4,000 feet and remain compatible with the farming surrounding it. Gary Hiedabek Operates an implement business and wants farming to prosper. Does not want condemnation and requests a decision not to go to a joint facility. George Runke Has worked at the Hutchinson airport for many years. Hutchinson has not been strongly air - minded. The present Hutchinson.airport is sufficient. Bernie Knutson Doesn't want all comments to be negative. Is a flyer and has safety concerns. The city is expanding to the south and the airport must move either now or later due to this expansion. Mayor Westlund then stated that the Council would accept one more comment from the floor. Gary Hoff Requests that the Council please vote "No" on the joint airport. Richard Beckman Responds concerning any interest his firm has in the venture, stating that as consultants they would be dealing with more controversy with a joint airport than with a single facility. Mayor Westlund turned discussion of the issue back to the Council at this time. The Council must consider what would the economic impact be. The question is COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 14, 1981 not "Litchfield or Hutchinson." Hutchinson is a hub for the area and to keep it as such, the Mayor favors expansion for both present and future. There are industries looking at Hutchinson as a place to locate now and if they were here, they would bring better markets for farm produce. It is true that 3M Company does not demand services from the city, yet they have contributed much. Alderman Beatty The question is, is Hutchinson ready to go with the four points brought by the joint commission. He feels the airport is needed; the use of local money and the joint powers agreement are accept- able, but he cannot support condemnation of property. Mayor Westlund Acknowledges receipt of the petition with several hundred signatures on it. Personally, he has received only one negative comment. X, Alderman Gruenhagen States that voters expect decisions, and he leans toward moving the airport. He has a farm background and understands the problems involved. But the farmers' children cannot all farm. Some will need good jobs in town. The next step should be selection of a site, with help from the rural people. We should negotiate peacefully for acquisition. Alderman Lueneburg This is a difficult decision. Has a problem with "per standard procedure" in guidelines and cannot accept condemnation as standard procedure. If this can be modified, then there is a possibility for progress. Mayor Westlund called for a motion. A motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen to join Litchfield to continue efforts in pursuing construction of a joint airport facility; first select a site, negotiate, and if it can be purchased, then enter into a joint powers agreement. The motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty. Motion carried with Aldermen Gruenhagen and Beatty voting "aye" and Alderman Lueneburg voting "nay." After further discussion of the motion, it was stated that the motion did not recognize or address the issue of eminent domain at this time. Consultant Richard Beckman stated that he anticipates Litchfield's reaction. They want a joint powers agreement now and don't want to proceed unless there is a guarantee of the completion of the many steps. We are years away from land acquisition and must have a joint powers agreement first. Mayor Westlund moved the meeting back to the Council Chambers at 9:45 P.M. -10- Ll COUNCIL MINUTES JULY,14, 1981 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR 0 City Administrator Plotz reported that a meeting with--the joint task force is scheduled for 7:00 A.M. Thursday, July 16 at the Central District Office Building. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE MAYOR Mayor Westlund asked that the City Council meet at 7:00 A.M. on Friday, July-:17 to appoint a replacement for Alderman Bruce Peterson. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY Assistant City Attorney Schaefer reported that he has reviewed the claim of Buffalo Bituminous concerning awarding of a bid for a project on which they were low bidder. Attorney Schaefer has responded to their claim informing them that the City Council has the discretion to award to the lowest responsible bidder and thus properly awarded the bid. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ENGINEER City Engineer Marlow Priebe reported that a meeting will be held with Rieke Carroll Mueller concerning the Step 1 study during the first week in August. John Mlinar spoke from the audience and asked about meetings concerning Clifton Heights storm sewers with residents, the City Engineer and the contractor. Mayor Westlund advised him that discussions with City staff and residents would be held. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS Verified claims were approved and payment authorized from appropriate funds on a motion by Alderman Gruenhagen, seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. 12. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Westlund at 11:00 P.M. -11� s 0 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JULY 27, 1981 The special meeting was called to order by Mayor Westlund at 2 :05 P.M. Present were: Alderman Beatty and Mayor Westlund. Absent: Aldermen Lueneburg and Gruen - hagen. Also present: City Administrator Plotz and City Accountant Merrill. Mayor Westlund dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 2782, Invitation for Bids for the Old Armory property. The one bid received was opened and read. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. $135,000.00 (plus contribu- Hutchinson, MN tion to City to- ward construction of community facil- ity; amount negoti- able and unspecified) The bid was deferred to the July 28, 1981 Council meeting for action. There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was declared adj ourned. 6� I 0 r� AFFIDAVIT 4 ' I v Lam` AM OVER 65 YEARS OF AGE,. OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME IS LESS THAN $5,000 PER YEAR- THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $5.25 FOR TRASH AND REFUSE. SERVICE WOULD IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION OF THE CHARGE TO $1.50 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY TO: WATER DEPARTMENT Date Account Number Data Change TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE Council Action: Approved Disapproved MANAGER'S OFFICE 6 16' BUSINESS OFFICE Phone 587 -2409 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY Phone 587 -2323 30 Second Avenue Southwest • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 July 17, 1981 Mr. Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Vacation of Alley Dear Marlow; In reference to your letter dated July 16, 1981 concerning the vacation of the alley by the Peace Luthern Church, I would like to submit the current information.. All of Hutchinson Telephone Company's underground cable facilities have been relocated two years ago. We do not have any objection to the Resolution for vacating the alley. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please contact me at our offices. WSC /lmj cc: Mr. Delton Haag 191 Sincerely yours, �jj— ---f—! -- Walter S. Clay Treasurer PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 520 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED BUILDING_PERMIT FEES THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. Section 520:05 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson, entitled Building Permit Fees, is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 520:00. Building Permit Fees. Subd. 1. A fee for each building permit shall be paid to the Clerk as set forth in the table in Section 520:05. Subd. 1. The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the Building Official. The valuation to be used in computing the permit and plan -check fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other permanent work or permanent equipment. Section 520:05. Schedule of Fees. The following shall be the schedule of fees for building permits in this municipality: Total Valuation Fee Up to $250.00 No Fee - Surcharge Only. $251.00 - $500.00 $6.50 $501.00 - $2,000.00 $6.50 for the 1st $500 plus $1.15 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000. $2,001.00 - $25,000.00 $23.75 for the 1st $2,000 plus $4.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000. $25,001.00 - $50,000.00 $129.55 for the lst $25,000 plus $3.45 for for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50.000. $50,001.00 - $100,000.00 $215.80 for the 1st $50,000 plus $2.30 for for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100.000. $100,001.00 and up $330.80 for the 1st $100,000 plus $1.80 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council this day of 1981 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Ralph D. Westlund / City Clerk Mayor � / / / (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July-23,-1981 TO: _ _ Mayor and City Council ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FROM: Ken Merrill ________!______________^ SUBJECT: _ _ Central Garage Fund _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ •_ _ _ _ We have been operating for the past six months the Central Garage Fund. The fund has been operating from a functional point but not from a bookkeeping function. With the four attached resolutions - # 1 establishing the fund we could begin the operation under proper authorization. The second resolution places all vehicles now listed in the general fixed asset area into the central garage where we will begin depreciation of the trucks and operate the fund similar to an enterprise fund. The fund would consider this as donated or contributed capital to begin operations. The third resolution transfers $5,000 cash from the general fund, for day to day operation; to the central garage fund. If this is approved, the transfer would be from contingency and be a permanent transfer to the central garage fund. This transfer will allow for cash flow which would otherwise unnecessarily burden the other funds for its operations. The fourth resolution transfers the balance from the bridge fund to the central garage fund. The money will be used for equipment purchases in 1981. � "L' 0 RESOLUTION NO. 6881 • RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY GARAGE FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT a fund - said Central Garage Fund is duly authorized to create accounts and bank accounts as necessary for its operation. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 1981. Ralph D. Westlund Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 RESOLUTION NO. 6882 0 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT TO CENTRAL GARAGE FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT - staff is authorized to transfer all automotive equipment located in the General Fixed Asset account to the Central Garage Fund. THAT - all automotive equipment shall be assigned at a value as deter- mined by staff and then depreciated over the estimated life of the equipment. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 1981. Ralph D. Westlund Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator z r RESOLUTION NO. 6883 9 TRANSFERRING $5,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE CENTRAL GARAGE FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $5,000.00 is hereby permanently transferred from the General Fund to the Central Garage Fund. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 1981. Ralph D. Westlund Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 3 0 RESOLUTION NO. 6884 9 RESOLUTION CLEARING AND CLOSING THE BRIDGE FUND BALANCE TO THE CENTRAL GARAGE FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the fund balance some $71,777.00 plus interest is hereby transferred to the Central Garage for vehicle replaced as designated in 1981. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 1981. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Ralph D. Westlund Mayor i)j Fund. .6 6 RESOLUTION NO. 6913 TRANSFERRING $10,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL FUND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT $10,000.00 is hereby transferred by the Liquor Store to the General Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 1981. Ralph D. Westlund Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk • BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME Minutes - June 1981 1o��'i2 iy.is� 1$17! The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home met Thursday June 18, 1981, at Burns Manor, 12:00 noon, President Leslie Linder presiding. All members were present except Eldred Miller and Esther Kuehl. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as presented. A motion to approve the minutes was made by Keith Duehn, seconded by Bruce Peterson and carried. A motion by Keith Duehn, seconded by Larry Graf, and carried to approve the bills as presented, a copy of which is attached to the minutes on file and made a part thereof. An additional $3.50 was approved to the State of Minnesota for laundry specifications. There is a possibility that the Private/Welfare rate lawsuit that is to be heard June 22, 1981 will be delayed in order to receive information from the U. S. Department of Health. Glenhaven Nursing Home has submitted a Certificate of Need for a new facility of 110 beds to be built ajoining the Glencoe hospital. The second emergency network warning civil defense receiver has been received and installed. A relay station has been installed in the basement. Omnibus Appropriations Bill: The bill is suppose to contain,9 hospital leave days (bed will be paid for and reserved for the welfare patient); increases the State's "Cap" on nursing home reimbursement to a maximum of 10°9 per year. Bond payment due $129242.50 to the City of Hutchinson. A motion by Larry Graf, seconded by Gloria Dansereau, and carried to make the bond payment to the City of Hutchinson. I -OL Page 2 June Minutes 1981 Workman's Compensation: After evaluating time lost by employees and noting that some chiropractors are very generous in issuing "no work" slips,, employees will be returned to work as soon as practicable. The M.D. and Chiropractor will be made aware of provisions for light, work duty for the affected employee* There being no further business, a motion by Larry Graf, seconded by Bruce Peterson, and carried, meeting adjourned to reconvene July 22, 1981, Wednesday noon,, at Burns Manor, Respectfully submitted, ATTEST: Leslie Linderg President 9 10 i 0 THE HUTCHINSON SAFETY COLIXiL The Hutchinson Safety Council rte` June 299 19811, at 12:0C noon at the Prairie 4ouse in KjItchinson. There were 12 member's present. pr=e,ident. Nyron Johnson opened the reeting with a silent pryer. the y minutes were approved as road. The allowing bil as were appm)ved by �ticn: 1 ro,; Johnson - Guest luncheon and ride to State Conference - $36.05, Lor°el-Ita i=. Pisihney - 1)st�'Le - x,7.17, Joyce Rir - postage - $41.80. Pr,, iderrt Myron John on spo a on the workshops he al tencled at the Gone =rno - Conference re;l.,Aing drum driving, 55 MPH speed limit, Neat belts, better, controll of medication whil; driving acid put driving restrictions on xedication mottles. Warren Kerropfer°t of the �w Co. stated he went to a v ..ry information seminar on industrial safety. Mike 1,6g( is chm,'i ing 00 Cable TV regarding storm tairnings and (lien ?cal disaster informction. Myron l ,:o reps -ted on the war€, of the Highway Patrol with wnaker ds on specia' roads and on F, .fficier;� in vjr district, Re: Fair- - we Nill bra using a slide presentation and need more slides. A generzil discussit,i was held as to iaca lion (new bldg). traffic pattern, etc. RE: Cabl, ri. The local cable TV was contaeced for a prograa on .the Hutchinson Safety Council. ,'fro.. Johnson will heck 'into this along iii th Mike Mange. the Bicycl. Sa.�'ety Officer is checking or, riding cn fain Street- and has been giving warnings to bi.:e riders. Also discuss:(, was the traffic situation near the P`i:a�?a 15 shopping cneter and the new shopping cen,. . area. T)he ration wa.,, tiide and seconded wa pay for the l unchaoii for our guest speaker. The nest meeti ;- g 4i y l be July 27, 1981. The maetirg rfja . �. ;.7ourner4 by mo'tior,. Sins -,ii t teal: Myron kh- mason, Pra.,.'O'dent Loretta F. Pishney, Svc, - •Trews., TREASURER'S REPORT Balance on hand fa. 1-11 94. lu W Johnson - ,36.05 E. Pishney - 7.17 J! fix - 4.BO Balance co hand 6- 30-8; - �-6.41F 7 - -&' MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 16, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Don Erickson at 7:34 P.M. with the following members being present: Bill Backen, Ted Beatty, Roland Ebent, Larry Romo and Elsa Young in addition to chairman Erickson. Absent: Clint Tracy. Also attending were City Administrator Gary Plotz, Director of Engineering, Marlow Priebe, Building Official Homer Pittman, Fire Marshal George Field and Assistant City Attorney Jim Schaefer. 2. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting dated May 19, 1981 were unanimously approved on motion by Ted Beatty and seconded by Elsa Young. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY MR. JAMES DEMEYER. The hearing was opened at 7:35 P.M. by Chairman Erickson with the reading of publication #2763 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. Jim DeMeyer commented that a few changes had been made from the original proposal such as the driveway had been widened and the distance between the buildings had been increased. Mr. DeMeyer presented letters from area residents indicating they favored the project. They were put in the file for future reference. Mr. Steve Bruhn, 924 Merrill, was present stating he felt it was a good plan. Mr. Roland Ebent pointed out the setback on the north is 22' in a C -4 zone and the requirement is 25'. -After discussion and consult- ing with the Assistant City Attorney, it was felt no variance was necessary based on the fact the site is in both a R -3 and C -4 zone and the sideyard in the R -3 portion is only 6'. Mr. George Field, Fire Marshal, also requested a fire hydrant be placed in the center of Heritage Square. The hearing was closed at 7:51 P.M. on motion by Bill Backen. Second- ed by Ted Beatty, the motion carried unanimously. 7_C1 I Hutchinson Planning Commission Page 2 June 16, 1981 Mr. Ted Beatty then made the motion to recommend approval to the City Council for the conditional use permit request providing a fire hydrant is placed in the center of Heritage Square and it should be noted the 22' setback on the north is considered adequate. Seconded by Roland Ebent, the motion unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY RICHARD LARSON FOR "KIMBERLY'S COUNTRY ESTATES" The hearing was opened by Chairman Don Erickson at 7:52 P.M. with the reading of public hearing # 2764 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. Erickson asked Mr. Plotz to update the Commission on what has happened since the last meeting. Mr. Plotz explained that the PUD which was approved last month by the Commission was tabeled by the Council. They had several requests of Mr. Larson. Meetings were held with residents and park location was discussed. The PUD request was then withdrawn by Mr. Richard Larson. He now is requesting a preliminary plat. A letter has been received from Mr. Larson requesting a variance from the Sub. Ord. #466 for a 40' street right -of -way rather than the required 60' street right -of -way. Mr. Richard Larson commented the park had been provided as requested and that the 40' street right -of -way was in harmony with the rest of the streets in the area. A road to the east was also provided as requested. Mr. John Mlinar, 704 Hilltop Drive, stated he felt more variances were necessary. He felt there were other requirements that were not complied with. Mr. Dave Bruzek, 111 Mark Drive, was concerned about the exit to the East and also felt 40' streets would present a real problem. Mr. Richard Larson used as an example the area of Shady Ridge which has had a lot of development with only one exit and it didn't seem to cause any problem with traffic. This area in fact is much larger than the one he is proposing. Mr. Mlinar referred to section # 5.213 of the Sub. Ord. #466 where it states one exit shall not be permitted. It was determined, however, that Mr. Larson had two exits with a third proposed for the future so this section did not apply to his proposal. Mr. Roman Haas, 113 Mark Drive, questioned if the City had the auth- ority to determine where the roads are to be placed outside of the city limits. Hutchinson Planning Commission Page 3 June 16, 1981 Mr. Ted Beatty explained this is the reason for our Mapped Street Act in which you can designate areas for streets. After being questioned on the subject of fire safety, George Field stated 40' streets were sufficient. Mr.- Mlinar. referred to Section 5.216 of the Subdivision Ordinance # 466 where it states residential blocks shall normally be of suf- 'ficient width for two tiers of lots. He felt with 25' setbacks cars would almost be in the streets that are parked in the drive- ways. Mr. Plotz stated our Director of Maintenance, Mr. Ralph Neumann, was concerned about snow removal. If we have a lot of snow it could be thrown on the cars. Should sidewalks ever be put in that too could be a problem. Mr. Ebent questioned Mr. Larson as to why he chose 40' streets in- stead of 60'. Mr. Larson replied one of the reasons was because of the 40' width streets already in and to keep 10,000 sq. feet per lot. Greater setbacks were then discussed to give more room for cars parked in the driveway. Mr. Lee Stritesky, 709 Hilltop Drive, was concerned -about-this -set- ting a precedent for future developers. Mrs. Ann Haas, 113 Mark Drive, felt the situation at present is not ideal so why continue in this manner. On motion by Elsa Young, the hearing was closed at 8:53 P.M. Second- ed by Ted Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. Mr. Larry Romo then made a motion to recommend approval of the pre- liminary plat contingent upon all front yard setbacks be 35'. Elsa Young seconded the motion and the motion carried with Bill Backen-, Ted Beatty, Don Erickson, Larry Romo and Elsa Young voting in favor and Roland Ebent being opposed. (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SUBMITTED BY SAYLES WALDRADTH The hearing was opened at 8:55 P.M. by Chairman Don Erickson with the reading of publication # 2765 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. Waldradth come forth and explained his request stating a new porch was necessary as the old one was rotting. Since the original porch was built the road had been widened. Mr. Waldradth also explained because of the location of his driveway he also needed a variance to build a garage 3' from the sideyard lot line rather than the required 6'. .Hutchinson Planning Commission Page 4 June 16, 1981 The variance request is to reduce the front yard setback from 25' to 13.5' and to reduce the sideyard setback from 6' to 3'. No one was present voicing any objection to his requests. Mr. Ted Beatty made a motion to close the hearing at 9:00 P.M. Seconded by Bill Backen, the motion unanimously carried. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council for the requested variances. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO (PUD) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MR. DELMAR PITTMAN "SOUTHDALE APARTMENTS" The hearing was opened at 9:02 P.M. by Chairman Don Erickson with the reading of publication #2766 as -published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. Plotz explained it was an agreement by the City to close Neal Ave. as a part of the PUD hearing in April 1979. However, it is the request of our Fire Chief, Mr. Lloyd Schlueter, to leave the access as is for better fire protection. At the time of the earl- ier hearing, Mr. Schlueter had not been properly consulted. A petition was presented of signatures of people in favor of leaving it open. Mr. Michael Carls, 915 Neal Avenue, felt that traffic was a problem and was concerned about the safety of children in the area. Mr. Michael Jaster, 815 Neal Avenue, pointed out that the property owner Mr. Pittman had complied with the fence and the playground area but the City had neither put up the "No Parking" signs or closed the Neal Avenue access as was agreed upon. Mr. Orville Kuiken, Mgr. of Southdale Apts., felt the residents of the apartment hardly used this access. A break -away barrier was suggested but it was determined that would be a problem with snow removal. After extensive discussion and numerous suggestions, the hearing was closed at 9:25 P.M. on motion by Elsa Young and seconded by Ted Beatty. The motion unanimously carried. Elsa Young then made a motion to ha open with the following conditions: 2) Signs reading "Do not Enter" and Yellowing of curb along Neal Avenue restrictions such as speed bumps if the motion carried unanimously. 0 ve the access on Neal Avenue remain 1) Sign "Fire Lane" be erected; "Oc not Exit" be erected; and 3) as well as any other necessary necessary. Seconded by Bill Backen, 0 Hutchinson Planning Commission Page 5 June 16, 1981 (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST SUBMITTED BY RICHARD SCHMiDTBAUER FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "SCHMIDTBAUER'S SECOND ADDITION" The hearing was opened at 9:40 P.M. with the reading of publicat- ion # 2767 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. James Black,, 15 Century Avenue, inquired why two hearings were held on this. Mr. Priebe, City Engineer, explained the first hearing was for the rezoning only. At the time of the Final plat request all easements will be listed. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to close the hearing at 9:45 P.M. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the preliminary plat of "Schmidtbauer's Second Addition ". Seconded by Bill Backen, it unanimously carried. (f) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 SECTION 8 ZONING DISTRICTS & ZONING MAP The hearing was opened at 9:46 P.M. with the reading of publication # 2768 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5, 1981. Mr. Plotz explained that most of the residentail property that comes into the City is rezoned to R -2 by request. By having it come in as R -2 rather-than R -1, it would save having so many hearings. Elsa Young questioned if we would have-any future R -1 in the City if we changed it. Mr. Priebe stated if the developer requests- R -1 zoning we could hold a hearing at that time. The hearing was closed at 9:48 P.M. on motion by Roland Ebent. Second- ed by Larry Romo, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the stated change in the zoning ordinance to have annexed areas come into the city as R -2 rather than R -1. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion unanimously carried. 4. OLD BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION ON SECTION 9 - ZONING ORDINANCE # 464 (SETBACKS) At the request of staff, this item was tabeled until the July meeting. Hutchinson Planning Commission _Page 6 June 16, 1981 (b) REVIEW OF DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED LANDSCAPE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Due to the fact the incorrect information was mailed to Mr. Priebe, he requested this item be tabeled until a later date. 5. NEW BUSINESS (a) REVIEW OF PARK DONATION SCHEDULE Mr. Plotz explained the park contribution schedule had not been reviewed for three years. With the rising cost of land it is becoming more difficult to purchase land for parks. He went on to say we are trying to arrive at a dollar figure that is closer to the land value. a 10% increase is proposed. Mr. Schmidtbauer stated if its too cheap you won't have many parks in the City. Elsa Young made a motion to set a public hearing date for the proposed park contribution schedule. Seconded by Ted Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board at this time, the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. on motion by Ted Beatty and seconded by Bill Backen. The motion unanimously carried. 0 40 40 • TREE BOARD MINUTES June 17, 1981 City Hall Council Chambers 0 Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. Members present were Mrs. Axel Jensen, Roy Johnsen, Ivan Larson and Mark Schnobrich. Members absent were Jerry Brown and Bruce Peterson. Fall planting in 1981 was discussed with action tabled until further clari- fication could be made of the 1981 Forestry Budget. Ivan Larson suggested that a title page with itemized figures be included for ease of reviewing the 1981 budget. Ivan Larson questioned Mark Schnobrich on the lack of action with the trans- planting of a 3 inch sugar maple to the Harry Blake boulevard. Last report was that Hutchinson Landscaping was to tree spade the tree from Mrs. E.W. Schmitz boulevard at 553 Jurgens to Harry Blake boulevard at 568 Jurgens. Schnobrich explained it was a mistake on his part. He stated that if Thody could guarantee the survival of the maple if transplanted this time of the year, that he would have the tree transplanted as soon as possible. If Hutchinson Landscaping could not guarantee the maple's survival, trans- planting would take place in the fall. Roy Johnsen made a motion, Ivan Larson seconded, to have Bruce Ericson be in attendance at the Tree Board Meetings. Ivan Larson requested Schnobrich to ask Ken Merrill to attend the next meeting to discuss the 1981 and 1982 budget. Roy Johnson stated Mr. Merrill should approve a time if the scheduled date of July 15, at 7:00 p.m. did not fit in with his schedule. Schnobrich stated that the injection equipment was still available this season and he suggested that this equipment could be loaned out to private tree owners for injection of.their elms. Ivan Larson stated that due to the expense of the equipment, loaning out of it should be on a fee basis with city personnel in attendance as a technical advisor. Also, written permission from the DNR, who owns the equipment, must be obtained. With those stipulations, the Board felt it would be a feasible project. Meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Respectfully, Mrs. Axel Jensen /Mark Schnobrich Secretary REVENUE REPORT Description GENERAL FUND TAXES LICENSES • PERMITS & FEES INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE CHARGES FOR SERVICES CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND FINES & FORFEITS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS REVENUE. FOR OTHER AGENCIES WATER & SEWER FUND WATER & SEWER UTILITIES CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JUNE, 1981 Current Adopted Month Budget $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 e 75.00 4,241.84 448.60 40,088.57 700.00 2,752.50 24,003.81 000 (455.12) $ 71,855.20 83,394.48 687,595.00 12,010.00 33,700.00 976,647.00 294,845.00 000 25,000.00 147,880.00 361,500.00 500.00 $2,539,677.00 $ 783,600.00 Year to Date Amount $0,000,000.00 17,831.3'3 9,979.00 20,011.84 179,015.28 127,714.33 2,000.00 28,766.46 95,119.28 82,500.00 Remaining Balance $0,000,000.00 669,763.67 2,031.00 13,688.16 797,631.72 167,130.67 (2,000.00) (3,766.46) 52,760.72 279,000.00 $ 562,982.40 $1,976.284.36 429,051.08 354,548.92 Percentage Used 2.6% 83.1% 59.4% 18.3% 43.3% 115.1% 64.3% 22.8% 54.8% �t EXPENSE REPORT Description GE'NCRAL FUND MAYOR 6 COUNCIL ADMINISTRATOR /CLERK /TREASURER OICTIONS FINANCE MOTOR VEIIICLE ASSESSING LEGAL PLANNING CITY IIALL OLD ARMORY SLICE DEPT. FIRE DEPT. COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS CIVIL DEFENSE SAFETY COUNCIL FIRE MARSHALL ENGINEERING CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JUNE, 14�R1,_� Current Adopted Year To Month Budget Date Amount $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 Remaining Balance $0,0000000.00 Percenthge Used i 5,952.90 27,567.00 19,463.56 8,103.44 70.6% 13,673.91 85•,916.00 50,869:50 35,046.50 59.2% 000 7,715.00 1,503.03 6,211.97 19.5% 10,534.03 133;712.00 67,994.07 65,717.93 .50.9% 4,621.58 X9,551.00 21,985.96 17,565.04 55.6% 000 15,150.00 7,600.50 7,549.50 50.2% 3,487.28 21,526.00 12,394.67 9,131.33 57.6% 246.19 1,825.00 941.49 883.51 51.6% 2,593.31 34,440:00 18,450.58 15,989.42 53.6% 1,781.72 25,420:00 12,568.78 12,851.22 49.4% 53,906.62 469,366.00 254,470.32 214,895.68 54.2% 2,990.03 80,650.00 21,310.66 59,339.34 26.4% 3,150.50 .20,509.00 10,163.64 10,345.36 49.6% 5,108.35 59,166.00 20,454.58 38,711.42 34.6% 000 950.00. 000 950.00 000 250.00 000 250.00 3,209.56 29,259,00 14,626.56 14,632.44 50.0% 15,173.17 129,882.00 71,226.61 58,655.39 54.8% 5XPENSE REPORT CONTINUED Current Adopted Year To Remaining Percentage I Description Month Budget Date Amount Balance Used $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 s,rREETS & ALLEYS 22,158.43 313,102.00 161,692.27 151,409.73 51.6% MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT 4,703.59 75,900.00 29,799.00 46,101.00 39.3% CONSERVATION OF HEALTH 000 300.00 000 300.00 LIBRARY 10,436.81 49,280.00 34,292.77 14,987.23 69.6% PARK $ RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 4,988.41 43,659.00 21,034.96 22,624.04 48.2% RECREATION 12,147.11 73,360,00 29,427.40 43,932.60 40.1% CIVIC ARENA 9,032.87 78,086.00 55,048.09 23,037.81 70.5% PARK DEPARTMENT 38,446.10 247,629-..00, 133,724.15 113,914.85 54.0% CEMETERY 3,651.28 30,541..00 14,683.17 15,857.83 48.1% DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT 100.00 300.00 1,497.34 ( 1,1D7.34) LAWCON 2,905.81 85,512.00 13,482.14 72,029.86 15.8% DEBT SERVICE 4,485.22 46,783.00 44,825.44 1,957.56 95.8% AIRPORT 4,770.15 49,775.00 29,549.21 20,225.79 59.4% TRANSIT 5,660.53 66,865-:00 26,248.97 40,616.03 39.3% UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPENSE 4,124.10 92,.221.•00 18,189.80 74,031.20 19.7% H RA 3,309.24 000 15,524.34 (15,524.34) $257,348.80 $2,466,167.00 $1,235,043.56 $1,201.133.34 WATER 6 SEWER FUND WATER &.SEWER OPERATIONS - ADM. 127,545.90 765,319. 00 350,849.57 4.14,469.43 45.8% WATER PLANT OPERATIONS 9,931.73 6,,03,900. 00 36,001.11 567,898.89 6.0% SEWER PLANT OPERATIONS 145,028.62 1,49Q,9.19..00 452,205.00 1,038.714.00 30.3% $ 282,506.25 $ 2,860.138 .00 $839,055. 68 $2,021.082.32 0 (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: July 10, 1981 TO: Planning Commission City Council FROM: Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections RE: Kimberly's Country Estates Preliminary Plat Dated July, 1981 Certificate of Approval As per Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the following data is hereby submitted: 0 Section 3.10 - Due to previous meetings with City, requirements have been met. Section 3.20 - Requirements have been met. Section 3.30 - Preliminary Plan Data Section 3.3101 - Larger scale meets requirements. Section 3.3102 - Data is shown. Section 3.3103 - Data is shown. Section 3.3104 - Data is shown. Section 3.3105 - Acreage is shown. Section 3.3106 - Zoning is shown. Section 3.3107 - Contours are shown. Section 3.3108 - Data is shown. Section 3.3109 - Data is shown. Section 3.3110 - Data is shown - Final street names to be approved by Planning Commission as per past policy. Section 3.3111 - Data is shown. - Section 3.3112 - Data is shown. Section 3.3113 - Data is shown. Section 3.3114 - Data is provided and lines not shown as requested by staff. Section 3.3115 - Data is shown. Section 3.3116 - Not required by staff. Section 3.3117 - None as per statement. Section 3.3118 - Development plans meet general requirements of City. Section 3.40 - Preliminary Plat Procedures Section 3.43 - Completed. Section 3.44 - Requirement being addressed with this report. r 0 0 -Planning Commission & City Council July 10, 1981 Kimberly's Country Estates Page 2 Section 5.20 - Street and Block Layout Section 5.201 - Requirements met. Section 5.202 - Requirements met. Section 5.203 - Layout completed as per abutting property owners request. Section 5.204 - Terrain is such grade requirement is no problem. Section 5.205 - Requests of City have been met. Section 5.206 - Requirements met. Section 5.207 - Not applicable in this case. Section 5.208 - Not applicable in this case. Section 5.209 - Requirements met except in area variance requested. Section 5.210 - Not applicable. Section 5.211 - Not applicable. Section 5.2111 thru 5.2113 - Not applicable Section 5.212 - Not applicable. Section 5.213 - Not applicable, three exits meets requirements. Section 5.214 - Meets requirements. Section 5.215 Section Section Section Section Section Section 5.216 Section 5.217 Section 5.218 5.2151 - Meets requirements. 5.2152 - Meets requirements. 5.2153 - Meets requirements. 5.2154 - Not applicable. 5.2155 - Meets requirements. Meets requirements or is not applicable. None recommended. Not applicable. Section 5.30 - Requirements of local street met, except where variance requested. Staff has determined that all streets are local streets. All other requirements relative to street surface with, sanitary sewer, watermains and storm sewer, will be completed as set forth in a subdivision agreement as per past policy. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Preliminary Plat with variance request be approved. 2. Streets be named as follows: a. South street be an extension of Hilltop'Drive. b. North street be an extension of Lindy Lane. c. East street to be determined by commission as per policy adopted in 1970. 3. Lindy Lane from Garden Drive to West line of Block 2 be 50' in width to allow centerline of surface to be 30' from South R/W and 20' from North R/W and be an extension of Lindy Lane West of Garden Drive as per ordinance. MARLOW V. PRIEBE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, PLANNING & PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MVP /pv • Z"'7 17(6'12) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: July 10, 1981 TO: Planning Commission City Council FROM: Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections RE: Schmidtbauer's Second Addition Preliminary Plat Dated July, 1981 Certificate of Approval As per Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the following data is hereby submitted: Section 3.10 - Due to previous meetings with City, requirements have been met. Section 3.20 - Requirements have been met. Section 3.30 - Preliminary Plan Data Section 3.3101 - Scale of 1" = 100' meets requirements. Section 3.3102 - Data is shown. Section 3.3103 - Data is shown. Section 3.3104 - Data is shown. Section 3.3105 - Acreage is shown. Section 3.3106 - Zoning is shown. Section 3.3107 - Contours are shown. Section 3.3108 - Data is shown. Section 3.3109 - Data is shown. Section 3.3110 - Data is shown - street names are as proposed by City when Oak Park Second Addition was approved. -- Section 3.3111 - Data is shown. Section 3.3112 - Data is shown. Section 3.3113 - Data is shown. Section 3.3114 - Data is provided and lines not shown as requested by staff. Section 3.3115 - Not applicable. Section 3.3116 - Not required by staff. Section 3.3117 - None as per statement. Section 3.3118 - Development plans meet general requirements of City. Section 3.40 - Preliminary Plat Procedures Section 3.43 - Completed. Section 3.44 - Requirement being addressed with this report. J ' Planning Commission * =y Council July 10, 1981 "Schznidtbauer's Second Addition Page 2 Section 5.20 - Street and Block Layout Section 5.201 - Requirements met. Section 5.202 - Requirements met. Section 5.203 - Requirements met. Section 5.204 - Terrain is such, grade requirement Section 5.205 - Proposal as per approved plan of M land. Section 5.206 - Requirements met. Section 5.207 - Not applicable in this case. Section 5.208 - Not applicable in this case. Section 5.209 - Requirements met. Section 5.210 - Not applicable. Section 5.211 - Requirements met or not applicable thru 5.2113. is no problem. . Schmidtbauer's total as per Section 5.2111 Section 5.212 - Not applicable. Section 5.213 - Not applicable, the two exits meet requirements. Section 5.214 - Meets requirements. Section 5.215 Section Section Section Section Section Section 5.216 Section.5.217 Section 5.218 5.2151 - Meets requirements. 5.2152 - Meets requirements. 5.2153 - Meets requirements. 5.2154 - Not applicable. 5.2155 - Meets requirements. Meets requirements or is not applicable. None recommended. Not applicable. Section 5.30 - Requirements of local street met. All other requirements relative to street surface, with sanitary sewer, watermains and storm sewer, will be completed as set forth in a subdivision agreement as per past policy. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Preliminary Plat be approved. MVP /pv MARLOW V. PRIEBE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, PLANNING & PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS considered necessary by the City Engineer for the purpose of soil and water con - servation. 5.20 STREET AND BLOCK LAYOUT: The following requirements are applicable to all subdivisions within the City o utchinson. 5.201 The Subdivision shall be so designed as to be in harmony with adjacent Sub- division and provide for the continuation of existing streets. Provisions shall be made for streets through the subdivision for the platting of contiguous property. No strip of unplatted land or portion of street or artifice shall be used or retained by the subdivider to impede the platting of adjacent parcels. 5.202 The street layout shall provide access adequate for emergency and public service vehicles to all lots and parcels of land within the subdivision. 5.203 Where appropriate to the design, streets shat I be established to avoid jogs at intersections and to promote continuity of local streets and those of higher classifications. S -treet jogs with centerline offsets of less than one hundred and twenty -five (125) feet shall be discouraged. 5.204 Streets shall be established to take advantage of the contour of the land so as to produce usable lots, cause a minimum of cutting and filling, and to produce streets with reasonable grades as defined in Section 5.50. 5.205 Certain proposed streets, where appropriate, shall be.extended to the bound - ary line of the tract to provide for adequate circulation of traffic within the vicinity. 5.206 Streets shall intersect other streets as near to a 90o angle as topography and other factors permit. Intersections of streets and arterial or collector streets shall be limited to a minimum angle of 700 unless specifically approved by the Commission. 5.207 Whenever there exists a dedicated or platted portion of a street or alley ad- jacent to the proposed subdivision which conforms to the Official Map, the remainder of the street or alley shall be platted to the prescribed width with- in the proposed subdivision. 5.208 Half -width streets shall be prohibited except where essential to the reason- able development of the subdivision in conformity with the other require- ments of these regulations. Where an existing, half -width street adjoins a portion of the boundary of a proposed subdivision, street dedication in a width needed to make this a full -width street may be required. 13 Ga w r4 fU 0 N-1 fY O lod 101! O 0 / / / (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: — July 28, 1981 — — — — — — TO: Mayor and City Council ---------------------------------- FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator and Ken Merrill, City Accountant SUBJECT: Group Health and Life Insurance --------------------------- - - - - -- The bid opening this afternoon provided us with three bids on health insurance. It would appear the low bid is that of Blue Cross /Blue Shield with a rate of $37.95 single coverage and $111.06 family coverage. The specifications called for a bid of 80% of "usual and customary" and 100% of "usual and customary." The cost difference is $2.94 /month on family coverage. It would be the recommendation to accept the bid of Blue Cross /Blue Shield with a 100% of "usual and customary" charges being paid. Life insurance bids received were five. The low bid was by Minnesota Mutual through Madsen Agency. The low bid was: 34c /1,000 /month for life 040 1,000 /month for AD &D It would be the recommendation to accept the bid of Minnesota Mutual. Our rates in 1980/81 were as follow: Health Life Insurance Single $22.47 4601,000 /month Family 66.93 /ms AD &D Insurance 05c /1,000 /month �7_ N I BID TABULATION GROUP HEALTH /MEDICAL AND LIFE INSURANCE JULY 28, 1981 2:00 P.M. MEDICAL AND HEALTH LIFE INSURANCE MONTHLY RATE FOR EMPLOYEE & DEPENDENT NAME AND ADDRESS OF BIDDER SURETY MONTHLY RATE PER THOUSAND UNDER AGE 65 (gpo) AGE 65 OVER(gpo ALT. #1 ALT. #2 ALT #1 ALT #2 LIFE A D & D G & R Insurance Agency Hutchinson, MN (INA Life) X .42 .05 Equitable Life Assurance Empl. - 38.95 Minneapolis, MN None Depen.- 79.99 118.94 Hutchinson Insurance Agency Hutchinson, MN (St. Paul Insurance) X .40 .05 Harley D. Albers ' Hutchinson, MN Security Life) X .39 .05 (Mutual of Omaha) X Empl. - 44.94 43.81 26.96 26.29 .46 .05 Depen.- 88.92 86.73 53.35 52.04 133.86 130.54 80.31 78.33 Madsen Agency - Hutchinson, MN Blue Cross /Blue Shield (Minnesota Mutual) X .34 .04 Blue Cross /Blue Shield X Empl. - 37.95 37.08 37.95 37.08 Depen.- 73.11 71.04 73.11 71.04 i 111.06 108.12 111.06 108.12 • 0 (612) 879 -2311 H�rcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST 0000 HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: — —July -28-, -laBI- — — — — — — TO: -Da y(?r and Council -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — FROM: -Va-t�r Billing Department — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — SUBJECT: _pelinguent Water Accounts — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —•— — — — 02- 0125 -0 -00 Gingerbread House 209 Main St. S. $75.37 Promised to Pay 07 -29 -81 02- 0130 -4 -00 Jeani Eisenschenk 209 Main St. S. Apt. 1 $16.75 REFUSE ONLY 02- 0280 -1 -00 Alton Wicklund 605 Main St. S. $36.32 Promised to Pay 08 -06 -81 04- 0675 -0 -00 Bondex, Inc. 115 Erie St. S. $31.00 REFUSE ONLY 05- 0180 -0 -00 Christy's 18 Main St. N. $88.79 07- 0135 -1 -00 Preception Graphics 828 Franklin St. S. $25.85 07- 0900 -1 -00 Lindsay vallacher 326 Fourth Ave. S.W. $50.01 12- 1037 -0 -00 Arctic Refrigeration Service 173 Fifth Ave. N.E. $48.75 REFUSE ONLY 40- 0217 -0 -00 Bruss Upholstering Highway 7 & 22 West $15.25 REFUSE ONLY Recommend water be discontinued at 12:00 NOON on Monday, August 3, 1981 except where noted. Refuse charges will be certified to taxes in October if not paid. q- (L. (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCH /NSO/1! 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 22, 1981 TO= Hutchinson Cif Council ________y______`_ FROM: _ _ Planning Commission _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT: _ _ _Conditional Use Permit submitted by Mr.' Robert Miley Pursuant to Section 6.07, C.5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On July 1, 1981 an application for a conditional use permit was submitted by Mr. Robert Miley for the purpose of moving in a newly constructed 8' x 12' storage shed. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 21, 1981 at which time no one was present objecting to this request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as pub- lished in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements for a Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request be granted. ,Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission \ ��b lJ (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: _ July 22, 1981_ _ _ _ _ _ TO: ,JilLtdiiiison City Council__________________ FROM: _YlaenngCommission SUBJECT: _ _ Vnrjance reguest submitted by Mr. Geoffrey Docken Pursuant to Section 6.05, B.3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On June 30,.1981 an application was submitted by Mr. Geoffrey Docken requesting a variance to allow an addition to an existing balcony that is non - conforming. One variance is necessary as the balcony covers a distance of more than one -third (1/3) the length of the building wall; also the balcony projects a distance of more than six (6) feet into the yard. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting held on July 21, 1981 at which time no one was present objecting to this request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as pub- lished in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. It was decided the request would not cause problems to any neighboring property owners. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission to grant the variance(s) requested to allow the addition to the existing balcony which is non - conforming. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission *C_11 _ r- / /_ / (612) 879 -2311 / CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN'. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: _ _ Hutchinson City Council _ _ _ ` FROM: _ _ Planning Commission _ _ _ _ _ — SUBJECT: _ _ Request for Sign Variance from Prairie House Pursuant to Section 6. 05, B.2, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to aforementioned request for a sign variance. HISTORY On July 1, 1981 an application for a sign variance was submitted by the Prairie House for the total area allowed and after reviewal it was determined they would also need a variance on the height of the free standing sign. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting held on July 21, 1981. No one was present objecting to this request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as pub - lished in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. It was determined a large portion of the sign(s) on the building was a part of the decor of the building. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance for the total area be granted. However the variance on the height of the free stand- ing sign was denied as it was determined it would be no problem to raise the sign. (Total area of variance being 86 sq. ft.) Variance was also given for wall sign exceeding (40) square feet. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission I � - / / ,e / (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 22, 1981 ----- ----- - - - - -- TO: _ _ Hutchinson City Council FROM: PlanninK Commission — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — SUBJECT: Variance re uest submitted by Angela Amundson Pursuant to Section 6.05, B.3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend - ation with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On July 1, 1981 an application was submitted by Angela Amundson requesting a variance from the off- street parking setback and the drainage plan of the lot. At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 21, 1981 a public hearing was held at which time no one•was present voicing any opposition to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as pub- lished in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. The property owner pointed out the drainage had to be the way it was because of the location of the sewer. If it,were any lower, there could not be a drain in the basement of the house. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance for the off - street parking setback be rejected as there is space available for a driveway and perhaps at a later date a single car garage. Based on the fact no neighbors were present objecting to the drainage plan, it was deter- mined to leave it as is. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 411 /_ / ,A/ / (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: _ _ _ Jul 23, i 981 TO: _ _ Hutchinson Cif Council_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FROM: _ _ Planning Commission` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT: _ _ Preliminarn► Plat submitted by Mr. Richard Larson to be _ known as "Kimberly's Country Estates " — Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with request to the aforementioned request for a preliminary plat. HISTORY On May 27, 1981 Mr. Richard Larson filed an application for a preliminary plat to be known as "Kimberly's Country Estates ". A public hearing was held June 16, 1981 at which time Mr. Larson requested a variance for the reduction of street right -of -way from 60' to 40' to conform to the streets already in Clifton Heights adjacent to his property. At that time, the Planning Commission approved the preliminary plat contingent upon all front yard setbacks be set at 351. The City Council considered this item on June 23, 1981 and after discussion referred it back to the Planning Commission for further review. Mr. Larson then presented a new plat at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 21, -1981 where he- requested a variance in the reduction in street right -of -way for the extension of Hilltop Drive from 60' to 40' and /or 50' right -of -way. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application, plat maps and appropriate fee were submitted. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners and a public notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981 and Friday, June 5, 1981. 3. A contribution of land was agreed upon for a public park. 4. All easements were shown, underground such as water and sewer were shown and a 60' right -of -way was shown along with two accesses from the subdivision. Q�� 9 0 Page 2 Finding of Fact - Preliminary Plat - Kimberly's Country Estates RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the preliminary plat to be known as "Kimberly's Country Estates" sub- ject to the variance on the extension of Hilltop Drive right -of way from 60' to 40' from easterly right -of -way line of Garden Drive easterly 155' and for a reduction in right -of -way of 60' to 50' from said point 155' east of Garden Drive to 255' east of Garden Drive all as shown on preliminary plat. It was also recommended the City Council consider grading and graveling Hilltop Drive in Santelman's Addition in the near future so there is another outlit in Clifton Heights. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission (612) 879 -2311 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: — — — — July 23, 1981 TO: _j11itShin_5_0n _Qity Council------------ - - - - -- FROM: - -_Plaw n.Lommission SUBJECT: — _ _P=ej;�zillagy Flat submitted by Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer for --- - - - - -- "Schmidtbauer's Second Addition" Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with request to the aforementioned request for preliminary plat. HISTORY On May 29, 1981 an application for a preliminary plat to be known as Schmidtbauer's Second Addition was received from Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 16, 1981 and again on July 21, 1981. No one was present voicing any opposition to this request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application, plat maps and appropriate fee were submitted. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners and a public hea -ring notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, June 5,-- 1981 and Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. A contribution of land was received for a public park. 4. The plat appeared to be in order as easements and water and sewer were all shown, as well as elevations. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission to recommend approval of the preliminary plat to be known as " Schmidtbauer's Second Addition ". Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Comm. • ! (612) 879 -2311 y�"C CITY OF HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON, MINN. 553150 WEST 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DAZE: July 23, 1981 --------- - - - - -- TO: -- Hutchinson City Council------------ - - - - -- FROM: -- Planning _Commission -------------- - - - - -- SUBJECT: — — Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 464 — (Updating Park Contribution Schedule) Pursuant to Section 6.06 C.1, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request. HISTORY At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on June 16, 1981 the Park Contribution Schedule was reviewed. It was the consensus of the Commission and staff that since the schedule had not been reviewed of changed in three years a 10% increase was in order. A public hearing was held on July 21, 1981 at which time it was agreed the increase is necessary. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All procedural requirements for an amendment to the zoning ordinance have been complied with. 2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Friday, July 10, 1981. 3. The proposal was deemed to be appropriate and in the best interests of the community. RECONAENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the 10% increase to the Park Contribution Schedule be adopted by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission �61j' I — 0 — (612) 587 -5151 '/T Y OF HUTCHINSON NASHINGTON AVENUE WEST "HINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections RE: Resolution No. 6557 Conditional Use Permit June Redman I checked the site on July 17, 1981 and found the following conditions relative to the permit stipulation: a. None at the time. b. Garage located as required. c. Condition being met to date. d. The six (6) inch high curb has not been installed. Concrete silo staves surround a portion of the green area. These are laid in two levels at a total height of six (6) inches. A portion of the green area is sodded and the balance of the green area has indoor /outdoor carpet over the concrete. The total green area is at least 600 square feet. e. Two (2) "No Parking" signs are in place. Based on the conditions I found, I propose we approve the installation. Said approval will be completed on August 3, 1981, unless I am notified to the contrary. Sincerely, T CITY OF HUTCHINSON Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections MVP /pv cc: Homer Pittman r � �r w • RESOLUTION NO. 6557 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07, C.5 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW UTILIZATION OF PRESENT STRUCTURE FOR RESIDENCE AND REAL ESTATE OFFICE AND RELOCATE EXISTING GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. June Redman, owner, of Hutchinson has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow present structure to be used for a residence and real estate office and to re- locate an existing garage, located at 225 Fifth Avenue N.E., having the following legal description: The northwesterly 55.0 feet of all that part of Lot 1, Block 3, North half of Hutchinson, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying north of State Highway No. 7. Except the easterly 50.00 feet thereof. The southeasterly line of the above described parcel is parallel with and 55.0 feet southeast- erly of, as measured at right angles to the northwesterly line of said Lot 1. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Com- prehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. rf)wrT.T1STnW The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above, contingent upon the following stipulations: a) No off street parking in front setback, b) Garage be moved as far north as possible, c) No business sign be permitted unless attached to main building, d) applicant pro- vide installation of 6" high concrete curbing surrounding a minimum of green area of 20' x 30' and this not to be used as part of the off street parking, and e) "No Park- ing in Circle Drive" signs be posted in driveway. RESOLUTION NO. 6557 PAGE 2 Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of July, 1980. alph D. Westlund Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. otz City Cle .Se- a /c : ) 20 11140 k` h 145 Aww Ns", • PSC 11140 k` h 145 Aww Ns", • 1 � r e 1 � /! 1, r� �J- _�w ^.•+ _ .�� e � 14 Cc, Q` Qo 1 � r e 1 � /! 1, r� �J- _�w ^.•+ _ .�� e � 14 Cc, HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 133 Third Avenue S.W. • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Telephone: (612) 587 -2168 1 EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY July 22, 1981 Mayor Ralph Westlund Citizens Bank Building Hutchinson Minnesota 55350 Dear Mayor Westlund: I would like to inform you that Warren Macemon has resigned his position as HRA Commissioner effective immediately due to his move outside of the municipal boundaries of the City of Hutchinson. The Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Act requires that any individual who is a commissioner must be a resident of the area of operation of the authority, which in the case of an authority created in and for a city, would be the territorial boundaries of that municipality. The Board of Commissioners has accepted Mr. Macemon's resignation and would like to recommend Mr. Garey Knudsen, Hutchinson Area Vocational Technical Institute Student Personnel Coordinator as his replacement. Mr. Knudsen has been contacted and is willing to accept the appointment as a commissioner. We shall wait to hear from you regarding any questions concerning the above recommendation, or Mr. Knudsen's appoint- ment to the HRA Board by the City Council. Thank you for your time. Very truly yours, iCCi� s� � lG ,e� 1GC-r Carol Haukos Executive Director 17 r 1�., 0 0 The City of Hutchinson, McLeod bids on the construction of a inson, Minnesota. Bids shall Administrator, Hutchinson City August 20, 1981, at which time aloud. 0 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS HUTCHINSON FIRE STATION CITY OF HUTCHINSON HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA County, Minnesota, Will receive sealed New Fire Station for the City of Hutch — be delivered to the Office of the City Hall on or before: 2:00 PM, Tuesday, bids will be publicly opened and read Separate bids will be received for the following Prime Contracts: General Construction Work Mechanical Work Electrical Work Form of Proposal, Drawings and Specifications will be on file at the office of Korngiebel Architects, 102 South Main Street, Hutchinson, Minnesota, Rieke.Carroll Muller Associates, Inc., 1011 South 1st Street, Hopkins, Minnesota, Builders Exchanges at Minneapolis, St. Paul, Mankato, and St. Cloud, Minnesota; and the F.W. Dodge Company, Minneapolis, Minn- esota. Drawings, Specifications and other documents may be obtained at the office of the Architect, Korngiebel Architects,.102 South Main Street, Hutchinson, Minnesota, upon payment of a $100.00 deposit for each set. The deposit will be refunded if all documents are returned in good con- dition within ten (10) days after the bid opening date. In the event the Contractor does not enter a proposal, the cost of-reproduction will be deducted from the amount of deposit. Additional Plans: Additional sets of plans and specifications may be secured upon payment of advertised deposit for each additional set; how- ever, the cost of reproduction will be deducted from these deposits, upon return of the Documents as outlined, whether a Proposal is filed or not. All bids must be accompanied by Guaranteed Bid- Security payable to the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, in an amount equal to five per cent (5 %) of the total amount of the bids. No bid may be withdrawn within forty — five (45) days after the schedul -ed closing time for the receipt of bids without consent of the Owner. The Owner reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities in the bidding. City of Hutchinson Hutchinson, M nnesota By: Ga___11_4 lot City Administrator Date: July 28, 1981 q -� V, ' / f / (612) 879 -2311 �/yUTIH "/ CITY OF MUTCH /NSO/V 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: _ July 24, 1981_______ TO: __ Ma )LO r and Council FROM: Mark Schnobrich, Ken Merrill SUBJECT: __Diseased Tree Program _ _______ __ ___ ______ Attached is the contract for the-State of Minnesota Shade Tree Program for the year 1981. We have estimated the cost and will receive back 25% of the City expenditure. The Budget did not anticipate any money from the State Shade Tree Program, thus we have gained some revenue. At present the tree losses are running higher than anticipated, thus our expense will maybe higher. We are also preparing the rate of subsidy from the City for Council approval early this fall. With shade tree cutbacks and the "DNR" program cut back, the City probably will not be able to fund 100% of the removal cost on private property. It would be requested at this time to be able to sign the attached contract with the State of Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 0( C t t t z �• 160100-SANN DIVISION. STUART- NOOItN CO.. MN Contract No. Shade Tree Program Minnesota DeputneW d AViealture 90 West Plato Boulevard, St. Paul, MN 55107 612- 296 -8580 Trn. No. Account I.D. Organization F.Y. Requisition No. Vendor Number Type Terms Cost Code b C.CD.7 C.CD.2 C.CD. A40 I Cost Code 4 Amount Suffix Object $END TYPE OF TRANSACTION n n Entered by Date Number U U I I Entered by A44 A45 A46 Date Number SANITATION /REFORESTATION AGREEMENT By and Between the MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (Hereinafter "department ") and CITY OF HUTCHINSON (Hereinafter "grantee ") WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. S 18.023 (Supp.,1979) provides funds on certain conditions for grants to local units of government for shade tree sanitation programs on public and private lands and for reforestation on public lands, and WHEREAS, grantee is properly authorized to apply for such grants to finance its share of its costs and represents that the budget for its sanitation and reforestation program for calendar year 81 is $ 93,000 NOW THEREFORE, department and grantee, in consideration of the respective promises contained herein, agree as .follows: 1. This agreement shall cover the period January 1, 1981 to December 31, 1981 2. The total obligation of the department pursuant to -ffis agreement shall not exceed Twenty -three Thousand Two Hundred Fifty dollars ($ 23,250 J. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS CONTAINED ON THE REVERSE OF THIS AGREEMENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: As to form and execution by the O3 ATTORNEY GENERAL: Ot GRANTEE: By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: O STATE AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT: By: By: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION: 08y: Y11101 iS1UrYN1 Date: O6 COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE: ENCUMBERED DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE By: DO D 3. Subject to legislative appropriations and aggregate demand, department shall pay grantee up to 50% of the costs of grantee's sanitation and reforestation program. Subject to the items and conditions set forth under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 18. 4. Grants to certain cities, counties and towns may include 90% of the costs of the first 50 trees planted under the grantee's reforestation program, if the grantee qualifies for such payment under Minn. Stat. § 18.023 (Supp. 1979). 5. Grantee shall submit quarterly, semi - annual or annual requests for payment to the department setting forth all information required by department. 6. Grantee shall fully comply with Minn. Stat. § 18.023 (Supp. 1979) and all rules promulgated pursuant thereto and shall maintain business records in conformance with generally accepted accounting and auditing principles to duly evidence its - costs and expenses and allow department full access thereto. Any costs incurred for an activity not in compliance with such said statute and rules shall be ineligible for reimbursement. Grantee agrees to promptly return all funds which have been paid to grantee by department for any costs incurred in violation of the terms of this agreement or the said statute and rules. 7. Grantee represents that none of its officers or employees has any financial interest in this contract or proceeds payable thereunder. 8. The department may make supplemental grants or setoffs in the event of changes in grantee's budget and actual expenditures. 9. This agreement may be cancelled by the department or grantee at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. In the event of such a cancellation, grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed. 10. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the grantee relevant to this agreement shall be subject to examination by the depart - ment and the legislative auditor. original - Finance Dept. Copy 1 - Grantee Copy 2 - Shade Tree Program Copy 3 - Agency Acctg. Unit Copy 4 - Suspense Copy 0 (612) 879 -2311 Hvrcy" CI T T OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 July 24, 1981 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ralph Neumann Director of Maintenance Re: Second Ave. S.W. Sanitary Sewer line. In reviewing the attached letter from the City Engineer I am in complete agreement with Marlow regarding the steps necessary to solve this overflow problem at the corner of Second Avenue and Dale Street. Permission is requested to work with Juul Contracting in construction of these four manholes. This is not a budgeted item. q-IW. • r(612T587-5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 7 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST ITCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Director of Maintenance Services FROM: Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections RE: Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line Second Avenue S.W. This is a follow up to the meeting you, Finley, and I had on July 15th relative to the problem with the above- referenced line. DATE: a. The 12" line along the river which crosses Second Avenue is an old trunk line built by WPA forces. b. The 15" line from said trunk line going West on Second Avenue was built about 1960 with the express purpose of serving the high school. c. The opening in said 15" line that allows said line to over flow into the storm sewer was in place prior to 1967. d. Since 1967, at least 120 new homes have been added to that part of the sanitary system that is served by the 12" line. e. At least another 60 new homes have been added to said system between 1960 and 1967 that are served through the 15" line into the 12" line. f. All this additional flow has created a capacity problem in the 12" line. g. We are proposing to close the overflow-as part of the storm sewer reconstruction at Dale and Second Avenue. h. Based on the conditions reported by Finley, this may create a flooding of some basements at certain times. i. Finley, also, reported the possible connection of sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems near 4th and Merrill. SOLUTIONS: a. We could continue with the overflow on a permanent basis. To do so, however, we would be ignoring the polluting effect of the rive, as well as the concern of the property owner, Mr. Pat ward at Second and Dale. Director of Maintena* Services Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line - Second Ave. S.W. July 22, 1981 Page 2 b. We could continue with the overflow on a temporary basis and research the most economical construction that can be made to reduce the flow on the old 12" line and not create a problem in some other area. c. We could remove the overflow, as planned, and do research as in "b ". RECOMMENDATION: I would recommend we do "Solution b ". As part of our research we should install four (4) manholes on the existing storm sewer line (old county tile) in Zajicek's Meadow Park Addition and then smoke test the sanitary sewer to try and locate the possible sanitary sewer and storm sewer system connection. I assume we will find a connection and then before we do any major re- routing of sewer flow, we should monitor the flow, in the event our biggest problem has been storm sewer. MVP /pv cc: Finley Mix Cal Rice MARLOW V. PRIEBE Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections ,P � I :F OUR•w AVENJE — C �OSGOOC AVENUE o Pp l I I a 1 LEA AVENUE / AVENUE 5 [J •NOVAS AVENUE UERGENS � iliTw � lam' -- — ROAD m n ; ROAD // In _ I .�F� AvEh_E i y I � I -_�- _ - - -_ L_.J Y'.. Er I AvENJEI Avk - -1 .—.. f— C— I I.,. � ��' 3 "- __ -. -_ inn � � I _— A•�__ kk I Im I E° x x I DEN A�9A A.E. vNDAvE AVE I u, - CRAG .E NEe. AV'E N v m - GRADE EC +J Tlr r 9 I Ia 5 I f _ ERfEMON• T Avf Ni;f , \ 'J4 ERANJAV; _ \ o . LLx7 J4f A•E•!tiE _ —__ _ '� ` - -ENl Rv M � � ,h 4 • < <I o o � �� , 4'Fhy � � o I I I I r- _._. -/� " "/ Fi45T--] A AVE MWJ L Li145T L L1,1 I wARYON - A � I IEt4'• G Gv( C �w I _ .. � �.- w AN( � _,� _ _ill S f \ f I 1 1 SEC - -__— - - p *E1t WE�� - I _ pa/w�� RD 6 FORCE A!N l l r r -- _ I I � � N NaA✓ I z' ►�E AL L_TDEN .VENUE t t � S W I I I : O � � L EOJRTw I I AvENJE I I S. 0 • COOP FARMERS ELEVATOR ASSOCIATION P. 0. Box 158 Phone 587 -4647 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 July 27, 1981 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attention: Gary Plotz Dear Sir: ��26274291100 ti JUL M w c N RECEI M Ln �Nm � The Farmers Elevator would like to request an authorization to haul 80,000# loads of grain. This authorization would be for hauling on Arch and Michigan to Highway 7. Please notify us as soon as you have made a decision. Sincerely, FARMERS ELEVATOR ASSOCIATION Ray Zimmermann General Manager L • COOP FARMERS ELEVATOR ASSOCIATION P. 0. Box 158 Phone 587 -4647 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 July 27, 1981 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attention: Gary Plotz Dear Sir: Subject: Street Lights r ,�2 142g3oUt1981 w N ;,ECOVED v °N s7 to The Farmers Elevator would like to request the installation of street lights on the south end of Michigan and the east side along Arch to the Farmers Elevator property. We feel because of the development that has taken place and the traffic that is generated they are needed for safety and security. Sincerely, Farmers Elevator Association Ray Zimmermann General Manager i (612) 587 -5151 '/T Y OF HUTCHINSON NASHINGTON AVENUE WEST 3HINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O DATE: July 27, 1981 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections RE: Assessments 1980 Projects I have reviewed the assessment rolls for the 1980 Projects with Ken Merrill, City Accountant. He checked with Gary; and our recommendation is that the public hearings for same be scheduled for 8:00 P.M., August 25th at the Regular Council Meeting. Sincerely, CITY OF HUTCHINSON Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering, Planning & Protective Inspections MVP /pv cc: Gary Plotz _ Ken Merrill 9- .w REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING July 28, 1981 WATER & SEWER FUND *State Treasurer Soc.Sec. $ 517.01 * STate Treasurer PERA 300.04 Crown Life Ins. Co. Aug. dental ins. 105.36 Krasen Plbg $ Htg. repairs 65.43 Nott Co. supplies $ repairs 493.60 Zins Machining repairs 81.00 Water Products Co. meter parts 52.56 1,615.00 GENERAL FUND *State Treasurer Soc. Sec. $ 4282.78 *State Treasurer PERA 3388.31 *Citizens Bank & Trust earnest money -Wigen Bldg. 10,000.00 *Laventhol & Horwarth CPA professional fees 12,000.00 *Schon Production Oak Ridge Concert 40,000.00 *Commissioner of Revenue June arena sales tax 119.00 Co. Treasurer dl fees for county 81.50 Crown Life Ins. Co. Aug. dental ins. 1390.76 Electric Motor Inc. repairs to drill 12.50 Family Rexall Drug supplies 120.26 Pamida Inc. supplies 5.34 Gopher Sign Co. signs 64.20 George Field arson seminar 57.59 Ideal Shoe Shop repairs 12.50 Hutch Telephone Co. machine hire 656.25 Hutch Utilities street lite replacement 6020.55 Keefe & Schantzen continue abstract 36.25 Logis computer charges 1305.03 Nott Co. supplies 163.00 Pitney Bowes meter rental 49.50 Gary Plotz meetings F mileage 205.52 Siems supplies 8.80 Standard Printing signs 59.75 Zins Machining repairs 18.00 Wm. Mueller & Sons road materials 1993.86 Ralph Westlund Mayors Day 107.56 Snyder Tree Service tree removal 10,323.50 Century Laboratories Inc. supplies 37.86 Quast Transfer Inc. freight charges 134.02 Forman Ford Paint Inc. paint 310.00 Hickory Lane burlap 8.50 Intl Conf. of Bldg. Officials membership dues 50.00 Jaycee Womens Club meeting room refund 25.00 Bernie Carlson contract payment 669.30 Larry Huhn o safety shoes 10.00 Jerry Dostal Sr. Citizens dance 75.00 Les Linder bus to zoo 130.00 Mrs. Louis Fallon swimming refund 14.00 Karla Reece swimming refund 7.00 Mrs. Duane Pischke swimming refund 7.00 l Y � l •1 -2- Suzanne McClure swimming refund 14.00 Marlys Hoeft reimbursement -craft supplies 9.98 Van Orden Realty appraisal 250.00 $ 94,233.97 BONDS OF 1980 Hutch Utilities street lighting 7159.09 OFF STREET PARKING Keefe $ Schantzen abstract costs 13.25 1st National Bank interest 875.00 Citizens Bank principal & interest 10,875.00 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE 1960.76 Twin City Wine Co. liquor $ wine 379.115 5 379 Midwest Wine Co. wine 1113.77 Griggs Cooper .$ Co. liquor 389.45 Ed Phillips $ Sons' liquor � wine 989.51 Old Peoria Co. liquor 3900.87 Commissioner of Revenue sales tax 3944.0 Ed Phillips $ Sons liquor F, wine 800.00 0 Schlueter Refrigeration compressor 9642.68 City of Hutchinson insurance 1779.59 Old Peoria Co. liquor $ wine 2711.55 Griggs Cooper & Co. liquor 1973.92 Twin City Wine Co. liquor $ wine $ 29,585.31 70491 i • CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (612)587 -5151 FOR YOUR INFORMATION EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE July 22, 1981 NAME AND ADDRESS Stacy Bethke, Route 2, Stewart, MN 55385 JOB TITLE Water Safety Instructor SUPERVISED BY Bruce Ericson - John McRaith EMPLOYMENT STATUS X New Employee Other: Full Time X Part Time or Seasonal PAY RATE $3.90 COMMENTS Replacement for present staff member who is not available for final session of swim instruction. Water Safety Instructor certificate required. (Unable to find local youth qualified to teach.) The above personnel action conforms to adopted personnel policy and to the council approved serectiog- process. pax'tM"t iHea�) /J Personnel Coordinator Yty A& i n i t ator Cy 3 -81 h !NC Z2 S.n \ , ., T Six Months January 1, thru June 30 Income from Residents Operating? Expenses: . administration & General Plant Operation & ;faint. Dietary Laundry & Linen Housekeeping Nursing Service Other Services Total Operating Expenses rOUiNICIPAL NURSING H0111-E North High Drive Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Phone (612)';',587-4919 Al �02122�pl- 1 Wig^ 1079 *r 653,5'1.09 104.,77L.26 54,946.6(- 109,346.38 37,976.51 34,336.59 241,402.51 19,575.23 $ 602,355.74 Operating Income before Dgpreciation w Depreciation Net Income - Operations Other Income Interest and Bond Expenses �`= GAIN 51,203.25 19,040.04 32,1n3.21 13,41.4.01 45,577.22 14,217.16 31,360.06 �D 1 730,711.60 110,079.26 70,713.13 129,625.98 45,029.24 37,477.13 280,611.85 21.228.05 0 694,764.64 35,947.16 ;`, 22,674.00 w 13,273.16 20,565.68 33,83$.84 20,557.75 1 $ 846,519.11 124,1,146.21 75,217.42 24 0, 2.9.4 ,-' 42,;C'.- 45,S4n. 2 24.279.82 501,771.22 44,747.87 21, 372 . G;; ,M 23,375.89 r _a � c•Z �, 1C :d 402139.99 le _ L.4 , 242 . JC 27,947.49 Prepared by; W. W. Kurt �••.. �✓`� yew . s_., � i r. tin and Cone al• r�.:la,iuv.c.� O aa1 r Salaries - Administration O-' °ice Supplies ami Prinwing Commun ica;,ions Travel L.:vertising & Public Relations Professional Services P. E .R..�. . Insurance Ref un3s and I�.iscellarcous Plant Operations & Maintenance: S. °....Lries Fuel Oil :ia.tural Oas 3lectricity �^ & Sewar 4 ttia Repairs Pu:-^c axed Services Supplies Salaries Food Supplies Laundry and Linen: Salaries Purchased Services Supplies nousa'.:eepinq: Salaries Sun ies %UrZ-ln `arvi Z . :< istera,� Nu -ses �icc:.:BeC. 'F'-- .c Vica.l Nurses C`tzer Nursing Personnel Supplies Ot:.er Services: -" u7s Salaries - Physicial 7herpy Supplies V 5 13j"43.30, 1- ,503.L2 1,977.95 1,367.12 649.70 414.00 o,2!2.12 38,814.6r 23,303.20 ti 1(-(, _70 a 104,774.26 16,639.88 421.64 11t431.08 8,475.01 3,161.3.3 6,242.76 59517.99 3,056.07 a 54,946.66 48,359.00 51,271.97 1,715.41 109,346.38 13,774.1.4 22,213.97 1, 988.70 37,976.81 5,2!8 1.83 V 3. , 33� . S9 / 33,C'C Q.5_ '-43,3n5.65 241,402.51 w 920.5. 3 S 19,575.23 MUMCOIPAL NURSING HC ;S North High Drive Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Phone (612) 587 -4919 1.,753.47 1'7,953.63 3,100.40 1,209.07 1,185.58 476.15 7,898.07 45,444.96 17,861.50 1F ^.G' S 110,079.26 w 19,677.63 11,398.24 01630.23 9,398.64 3,9 ^3. 2,377.20 7,227.73 7,530.98 r 70,713.13 u 582210.96 65,232.55 6.182.47 129,625.98 15,921.04. 24,276.50 L•,831.70 S 45,029.24 33,335.27 c' r 37,477.13 62,766.CO 20",C76,17 172,090,10 17.67 280,611.85 072.72 17,765.05 2 VLC�C.2; 21,22b .O5 a -.53 l 1,A.S3 64, C 18,CCC.C13 2_l1. '1. $ 124,?' S.21 v 27.547 - 3,COO.CO 9 1 - I , 044.: n ti 3,53^ ' -G9 7,4 C�. v_. - - I+/Y 1 rt 75,217._2 67;,i/?-:. 6,521 C `r = 40y�:>.! c 15s7c =,.21 2' 17 2. 2 ,":,5C.17 421V-19-'1- - l --i-77. / K 5, -- 4 2. 340, 2.,27;. Oi:7 R North High Drive Hutchinson, fv.inneso;s 55350 Phone (612) 587 -4919 DEP.R.Ci TION iital .."Q� January 1, thru June 30 - ,, c res , 3929 c1 , • S�_, 79 tiJ , J•�.• _; 7 - -. yJ r.• j� Special M—nals 1,847.5 2,091 17 4,0 2.85 n: I, 721, 1,405.71 = ,5co.c7 0. T. Activities 2,682.01 2,267.47 2,110.1.. ';scellanaous 137.57 205.05 1710.b0 P;,3rruacy l,1Gd.so 235.49 1,50�..90 ": ,,Sicare Retroactive Ad j ustments 1,000.7-7 'i, A64.. CO = S 13,414.01 20,565.68 ;q 16,8:4.1C DEP.R.Ci TION iital .."Q� K I 0 40 02 - ,, r ur nishir,� and Equipment 6.,400.02 9,930.00 8, c23.0: r°.:.Q I.provemar t 240.00 282. CJ 19 22 , 21,372.00 I:NCOMF^ AITALYSIS Incorc fron Residents 653,561.99 Exp-.,ses applicable to Services w 629,838.88 rota-, Bad Days 23349 Total Resident Days 23185 Perc,�);:t, Occupancy .0,93 f. er Diem Income 20.19 ?;;r Diem Costs u 27.27 Per Diem Gain 1 02 w • 730,711.80 846,519.11 725,858.52 827,497.10 2347 23349 23175 .987 S 31.53 31.32 .21 2377 . °C7 41, .. 30.37 35.55 . ^2 A/ I .n , E"t CA !�r-i `- G l k ndrin 1 000 miles of branch lines BN may aba _ equip vent that C eredo on 29,300 the d Interstate Intends Commerce Commis efflcie tly expensive Sion gives its approval. mile system and they are to operate, it said. The state has already filed for aban- Instead, BN said, railroad eke botch lines. more of Minnesota more money by letting the grain to elevators On-main lines and operating trains composed of Following railroad is study 8�abandon- jumbo-sized hopper cars. ment: It could take a year or more for the Morris to Browns valley. 46.g miles; Way-ta to railroad to end service on these Hutchinson, 44.2; Elk River to Princeton, 16*1 routes. Fergus Fails to Foxhome, 139; Fertile to Ulen. 32; Bingham to Wllas, 63; St. Cloud to Brook Park 58.3: The lines are in addition to the 219 miles of line in the state that the rail- Burlington Northern Railroad (BN) ngd Friday more t thane 000 miles of branch lines in three states, Including seven' lines totaling 275 miles in Minnesota. The other lines under study for pos- sible abandonment are in North and Outh *oUtranch as many as 74mlles of track on. lines. one line of service. iles in South Dakota may The current system of branch lines is obsolete, the railroad said. They are not fuel- efficient, they p 0 h W Z 00 rn w C O 10 C O J3 ao O .0 C S Y O N m N c� CD m N o acl s? o og 2 as v �'.o c u ►. W 85 o r(x. 0 C3 t=s z$os -4 �ws o a� oig (3 PQ cc W s��a�'� y (A v y C N {0 �s'�s�� a p v Z ffi E E:: "E.. E A019 y© M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 23, 1981 TO: _ _ Myor and City Council FROM: _ _ _Elk's Lodge _# 2427 _ SUBJECT: _ _ _Permit to sell beer at Oak Ridge Boys Concert Mr. Lee Cox, representing the Elk's Club, has asked that the City Council be advised that due to conflicting circumstances, and in the interest of maintaining good relations in the City, the Elks Club prefers not to make use of the beer permit issued them for the Oak Ridge Boys Concert. Thank You Lee Cox cc: Dean O'Borsky • To whom it may concern: In comments regarding our pollution infected society *especially junk mail that our people pay good money for that in the good old days could be discarded usefully but now-a -days is a problem for the waste basket, like newspapers that support unA erican programs and ` commission type government and pimp like city councils, one sided political and news reports given by :pelf appointed udges of the condition and suppresed discussion of m'Dortant issues seems to the writer to be of a yellow tint, and not of the general good for our ailing society. If our news system and our politicians and our people Would insist and support honesty and loyalty in all branches of service to our people, Our people would know the truth and the truth would make them free from hypocrisy,and ` misery and bad fellowship in our good Country.Thank You date JUL 2 3 9981 copy Hutchinson Leader e „ City Council a Ministerial Assc 2�2�22232�2 �G� � 4'OR"YpU STATE OF ro+n M-W DEPARTMENT N DNR INFORMATION (6t) 296 -6157 r�? • OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX 44, CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155 Mark Schnobrich City Forester 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Dear Mr. Schnobrich: July 15, 1981 FILE NO. 6500 -2-1-7 FAR y0 11R Op op, T I can certainly appreciate the City of Hutchinson's predicament in not being able to financially continue its systemic fungicide injection project. Since the federal Dutch elm disease demonstration program has, itself, suffered from monetary cut - backs, this has been one recom- mended management practice that has been reduced or eliminated entirely. As long as the injection equipment is still available to the City, it is acceptable to this program that Hutchinson allow its private citizens to make use of it on a fee basis. The City must abide by four consid- erations, however. They are: 1) Each resident injecting a tree must sign a release which states that systemic fungicides are used as a management tool only, that they are not a guarantee that the tree will remain forever free of a Dutch elm disease infection - that the City will still be respon- sible for condemning any tree on private property, whether or not it has been injected, if it is diseased; 2) All equipment will be used by residents only under the supervision of municipal forestry personnel; 3) All funds collected from the residents for use of this equipment will be credited to the City's Dutch elm disease management program; and, 4) The City will be responsible for replacing or repairing all lost and damaged equipment. I thank you for finding a way to maintain a disease management practice which is the first to suffer from monetary cut-backs. Used with discre- tion, systemic fungicides can give added protection to an elm tree. Please continue to follow the original reccnv endation of program personnel and encourage each individual to inject only those elms which are histor- ically or aesthetically valuable. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER -Mark Schnobrich July 15, 1981 Page Two If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (612) 296-5958. Sincerely, 62t��imisch Supervisor, Federal Dutch Elm Disease Program Division of Forestry MH : kas 4 0 0 To From Subject GNI OI-0ns -nM HOWARD NEEDLES TQMMEN & ' tti 6784 File RDB �151s`, Joint Airport Committee Meeting - Hutchinson Ointeroff Correspondence Date July_14, 1981 i`- t M •i "'C At At the June lot h Public Informational Meeting the Joint Committee indicated to the public that it would attempt to select a preferred site at a meeting on July 8, 1981. RDB attended that July 8th meeting in Hutchinson. The Litchfield contingent of the joint committee had heard indications that the Hutchinson City Council was reluctant to use condemnation for land acquisition and may not be as committed to the joint airport project as had previously been thought. The Litchfield contingent therefore brought to the meeting the attached listing of four items that they recommended be directed to each city council to again determine their level of commitment to this project. It was decided that each city council would meet on Tuesday July 14th to address these four points and reassess their current feelings. The two council meetings were intentionally scheduled at the same time so that action of one council would not influence the action of the other. The July 8th meeting therefore was very short and consisted of a motion to go back to the councils for new or redirection. The meeting then adjourned less than 10 minutes after it started. There were perhaps 80 people in attendance, most-from areas near one of the potential sites and opposed to the joint airport. Naturally this group was disappointed since they had expected to learn what site would be chosen and instead felt that they were getting the run around. We did remain and answer questions much in the same format as those discussed at the June 10th Public Informational meeting for another two hours. I believe that when the people left they at least did not feel that the joint committee was not responding to their questions. After the meeting the Hutchinson Mayor Ralph D. Westlund came up and intro- duced himself to RDB and asked that I attend their council meeting on June 14th. Wayne Carlson was standing nearby and said that he had no problem with my attending the Hutchinson council meeting. Westland said he would like me to make a brief presentation on the project and in particular address five or six points that have been raised in letters to the editor in the Hutcinson paper. He will send me clippings of those letters on July 9th. Councilman Ted R. Beatty also came up after the meeting.and introduced himself and asked for a copy of the June 10 Public Informational Meeting handout. I stated that I did not have any copies with me but could send one. He indicated that he would go to Gary Plotz and get a copy from the City. A copy was also mailed to Mr. Beatty on 7- 10 -81. The Joint Airport Committee decided that if the two city councils agree to pursue the project they will hold their next committee meeting in Litchfield on July 29th. Finally, RDB distributed copies of the memo dated July 8, 1981 and two layouts number 7 and 7A (attached).to the Joint Airport Committee. RDB /dkh cc: W. Carlson G. Plotz J. Groehler HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENOOFF To Files 6784 From RDB Subj�bt .0 V c� GN101 -0775 -25M \ V, interoffice Corr ondence__1_, Date July 20 Meeting of Litchfield, Hutchinson & Mn /DOT Representati ;� n b67 8 9 101j., ,45 Its s A meeting was held at 10 am on 7 -17 -81 at Mn /DOT to disc ,land a M ,� tion procedures, joint power agreements and any recommendations 8z ould have about what action the two cities might next take. Atten were Messrs. R. Keinz, J. Fortman & J. Groehler of Mn /DOT - Aero; Mayors V. Hendrickson& R. Westlund and City Admnrs. W. Carlson & G. Plotz from the two cities and R. Beckman for HNTB. Discussions focused-on the action taken by the two City Councils on July 14, the feelings the two cities have regarding commitment to the project, the normal procedures followed in land acquisition, the way or manner in which the possible eventual use of eminent domain as a last resort is discussed at future meetings, and what recommendations Mn /DOT - Aero would have for further project development. It was agreed that Mn /DOT would review the Council actions taken on July 14 and would then send letters to each City outlining the "normal" site selection, masterplanning, design, land acquisition and eventual construction procedures followed in airport project development. The Councils would then review those procedures and decide to jointly proceed, including adoption of a joint powers agreement, or drop the project. The meeting was very productive in the writer's opinion. I believe it reaffirmed a commitment by all three governmental units to pursue a joint airport, provided more understanding of the concerns of both cities and hopefully will provide means of resolving the critical issues of land acquisition procedures and a joint powers agency agreement. RDB /dkh nyl cc: All attendees. i l CITY OF LITCHFIELD ,- RESOLUTION NO. 81 -90 131415 E\ Cb On motion of Councilman Agren, seconded by Counc4-1 -an Paul Johnson, the following resolution was passed and adopted by the Litchfield City 'b Council at a meeting held July 6, 1981, at the Litchfield City Hall: WHEREAS, the Minnesota Regional Development Commission Act was established in 1969, to provide a system of substate regions; and WHEREAS, the sub -state regions were to provide coordinative A -95 services for the governmental units within their area; and WHEREAS, Region 6E has been established and is providing the A -95 services; and r WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has enacted legislation which allows for governmental units to petition the State Planning Agency by formal resolution for termination of a commission; and WHEREAS, the Litchfield City Council feels that Region 6E Regional Development Commission is not providing any valuable service to our community; and WHEREAS, the Litchfield City Council feels that Region 6E Regional Development Commission is no longer in the public welfare and interest and is not needed to accomplish the purposes of the Regional Development Adt of 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Litchfield City Council hereby petitions the State Planning Agency by resolution to .hold hearings on the termination of Region 6E Regional Development Cc=ission. Adopted this 6th day of July, 1981. Attest: Clerk-Treagurer Approved: Mayor CJ FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HUTCHINSON 308 SOUTH MAIN STREET / HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 Phone'(612) 587 -4959 July 20, 1981 Hutchinson City Clerk Office City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: Hutch Thrifty Flyers, Inc. Larry Notman & Dr. Dan Huebert Gentlemen: F04 ro1,T /'yFQ� 'r It is at the request of the above that the enclosed Cashier's Check No. 106437 in the amount of $16.44 be donated to the City of Hutchinson Airport Fund. Sincerely, y Executive Vice President LAVH:ls enc. 0 OOALITION OF OUI'STATE CITIES a? YO MINUIES o,� Friday, June 12 1981 �4� � Y, /oN Radisson Hotel, St. Paul, MN 1. Call to Order: The meeting was called to order by President John Patton at 7:30 A.M. The following persons were present: Robert Fight, Austin; Jahn Patton, Marty Cassem, Vernon Eriksen,.David Childs, Blue Earth; Robert Malliet, Fairmont; Ralph Westlund, Hutchinson; Arline Brawn, Bill Bassett, Mankato; Linda Berre, Bob Him er, Marshall; Lee Swanson, Norris; Lin 14ilker, North Mankato; Pete Stolley, Northfield; Roberta Anderson, Owatonna; Stevan Kvenvold, Rochester; Phil Lynch, St. Cloud; Mark Sather, Waseca; Earl Laufenburger, Winona; Harlin Owens, Worthington; Lee Munnich, Midwest Research; Peggy Flicker, Don Slater, League of MN Cities. 2. Presentation of Plaques: President Patton, with great pleasure, presented plaques to Roberta Anderson and Tan Mealey in recognition of their dedicated service as President and Secretary of the Coalition during 1980. Roberta Anderson, with equal pleasure, accepted both plaques and thanked those present for the opport- unity she had to be President of the Coalition. 3. Guest Speaker - Lee Munnich Mr. Munnich discussed two papers which he had prepared dealing with the impact of state and federal budget cuts on cities in Minnesota. - He stated that City Goverrunents will need to do longer range fiscal planning in the future than they have been accustomed to doing in the past. Real service cuts by Minnesota cities are virtually certain. The earlier city officials begin planning for these cuts the more flexibility they will have in choosing those cuts which do the least damage to city residents. The next three years will be critical for Minnesota Cities. Difficult decisions about raising taxes, cutting personnel, cutting services and im- proving productivity must be made. Obtaining the solutions will require creativity, honesty and hard work by city officials. Mr. Munnich also stated that for more specific projections of the federal /state iripacts of budget cuts he needs specific financial information fran sore cities and he asked that those present send any financial informa- ticn,they have so that he can carry out further analysis. Meeting adjourned at 10:15 A.M. 0 • MEETING NOTICE COALITION OF OUTSTATE CITIES &P WU Inv This month the City of St. Cloud will be our host for the Meeting. Our tentative schedule is as follows: aoz Thursday, August 13, 1981, Holiday Inn (Highway 15 vision St.) St. Cloud, MN. top 11014 10:00 A.M. Coffee and Polls Alpole 10:30 - 11:30 Morning Session 3Q'r/0jV 11:30 Cash Bar 12:00-1:00 lunch ($6.00) 1:00-2:30 Afternoon Session The agenda of discussion items has not been finalized but there are a number of key items which should be discussed so do plan to attend. Attachments - minutes of June 12, 1981 meting. Thorsen Campbell Rolando & Lehne Richard D Tnorsen,--_.F.A. v Robert Camobe, C.P.A Charles L. Rolando, Jr_. CF A Floyd }. Lehne, C P.A. Dennis D. McGill, CP.A. Roger';. Ocei, C.P.A. FOR ro NFp�� Certified Public Accountants Jul y , 20 1981 t 1 Mr. Leonard A. Metallo '�$y Colonial Western Financial Corporation 6635 S. Dayton, Suite 310 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Dear Mr. Metallo: I am in receipt of the information you sent on July 14, 1981. In ating_ the data, I find that additional information is eeded in order to advis City of Hutchinson whether or QtHutchinson Alcohol Products is a viable project economically. The required information is as follows: 1. Detailed information on the use of the proceeds of the bond issue_ 2. Projected income statements and balance sheets for the project for at least five years. 3. Details as to ownership of the project and who will guaranty the project. If you have any questions about this, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, THORSEN CAMPBELL ROLANDO & LEHNE BY A, (;/ C.P.A. R r J. Ocel Member of The American Group of C.P.A. Firms with offices in principal cities cta C�- ,� l - ;.� %, %. ` C/s e- ' Burlington Northern Total Shipments Sent Total Shipments Received Revenue Projected Use w /wo. Comments 1 Users Tons: Cars: Tons: Cars: 1979 1980 better service 1979 1980 1 1979 1980 1979 1980 1979 11980 1982 1985 Polar Chemical & 600 8 600 800 6 8 ? ? �, 1,000 T 1,500 T Cost $2.00 per ton more by truck. Save the RR. Gas _ Harris Pine Mill 61 44 8- 5 COD COD Lenneman Beverage -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- If truck strike or rates higher 10 C 15 C tchinson Coop 2,800 3,800 28 98,000 144,400 46 C 60 C $6.00 per ton more by truck. 4,600 T 6,000 T Stearnswood,�Inc,,.- - , -0- -0- -0- -0- 597 932 12 f38 36,700 64,100 0 �C (58 CC To receive b truck would cost -� 1) 400 2 , 80� T minimum of 15% Great Plains Supply -0- -0- -0- -0- 54 -0- 3,400 -0- 4 C 6 C 300 T 200 T 18 C Hutchinson Mfg. -0- -0- -0- -0- 200 50 4 1 12,000 2,500 10 C Sales, Inc. Rockite Silo -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- If can rec'v 100 T hoppers 25 C 50 C 2,500 T 5 000 T Schramm Implement -0- -0- -0- -0- 3 - same 3,000 3,600 5 C or 7 C or 14 Combines shipped by truck are double what it is by rail. combines 10 combines combines apiece Hutchinson Farm -0- -0- -0- -0- 60 60 3 3 7 Service Hutchinson Farm 62,851 61,040 116 68 5,786 7,347 60 70 206,000 155,000 54 unit trains RR freight saved us 200,000 Elevator 5 -10 million bushels in 1980 Patchin Fertilizer 2,200 2,100 20 15 2,200 2,100 20 15 33,000 38,000 400 T more ? Little difference in cost if shipped by truck Tonka Corporation 11,773 12,28 486 b'571 -0- -0- 583,200 799,400 14,742,972 17,691,566 RR saved 729,000 in 1979 999,250 in 1980 410 5.7731 ---- Burlington Northern Total Shipments Sent Total Shipments Received Revenue Projected Use w /wo Comments Users Tons: Cars: Tons: Cars: 1979 1980 better service 1979 1980 1979 1980 1979 1980 1979 1 1980 1982 1985 Hutch Cold Storage 360 12,834 60 317 -0- -0- -0- -0- N/A N/A 13,000 T 13,000 T Freight pd by owner of cheese. Hutch Scrap Metal 930 1,040 17 18 -0- -0- -0- -0- 25,000 25,000 1,100 T 1,100 T Maintain current use 1/3 to Canada 2/3 to MN /WI Simonson Lumber -0- -0- -0- -0- N/A N/A 7 6 N/A N/A 8 C 14 C 5 cars if service is same.,, Hutchinson Products -0- -0- -0- -0- 162 15 9 1 7,215 1,100 360 T* 684 T *RR needs to be price cnlo 20 C 38 C etitive. Costs 5% more to receive by truck. Texgas, Inc. -0- -0- -0- -0- N/A N/A 12 6 N/A N/A 10 J 10 J Storage facility for propane jumbos limits our use. Freight is � to � ¢ per al cheaper by RF Pure Culture Products N/A N/A N/A N/A 2,270.8 3,248.2 29J_ 42J N/A N/A 89 J'+ w o __ 89 J+ w o gal. cars - Jumbo better better , expansion planned service service Lester's, Inc. -0- -0- 3 -4 1 -0- -0- 500 3 1,000,000 600 C 800 C RR freight saves us between 250,000 - 400,000 pr. yr. Cominco -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 30 -40 30-40 30 -40 Use remains same - save 16,000 - 20,000 pr. yr. by RR Farmers Coop 100 -0- -0- -0- N/A N/A 927 1,085 1,000,000 T 1,000,000 T Because o service, delays, Lester Prairie truck is cheaper. Need RR. Poly Foam -0- -0- 5 2 -3 -0- -0- -0- -0- 5.0 5 C .-better New Germany -Mayer -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 35 -40 C 35 -40 C Need better service S Feed Mill turn- around time. J.P. Rockvam Boat -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 2 2 2 C 2 C Yard United Bldg. Center -0- -0- -0- -0- 125 90 3 2 4 C 10 C Freight 10% more by truck 0 1 l 4 Burlington Northern Total Shipments Sent Total Shipments Cars: Revenue Projected Use w /wo Comments Users Tons: Cars: Received 1979 1980 better service 1979 1980 1979 1980 Tons: Cars: 1982 1985 1979 11980 1979 1980 insted Farmers No current use but Creamery & Co -op want rail saved. Rable Furniture - Want rail saved. Mayer Lumber Co. 5 May use in future if bldg gets better. Advance Machine May use in future. Spring Park Wouldn't want to loose service. TOTALS 11,840,512 12,362,831 716 230 1,006 435 14,855 18,442.2 1,626 1,642 2,627,515 2,233,100 Without Tonka Corp. 67,102 77,058 2,044,315 1,433,700 U a� U