The URL can be used to link to this page

cp06-22-1982 c cCITY CALENDAR V WEEK OF .JUNE 20 '"'0 JUNE 26 -�q (2)2 is EDNESDAY -23- El 7 :30 p.m. Community Development Corp at New Fire Hall SUNDAY -20- FATHERS' DAY Dad 0 `Nary Special. THURSDAY -24- MONDAY -21- p.m. Bids for 1982 Improvement Program 3 FRIDAY -25- 1r TUESDAY -22- 4 p.m. City Council /Street & I Park Employees 7:30 p.m. City Council Meets SATURDAY -26- v v AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1982 LX. Call Meeting to Order - 7:30 p.m. 11. Invocation - Reverend Maynard Johnson A. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of June 8, 1982 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to approve as amended �4. Public Hearing None 5. Communications, Requests and Petitions '►� °� V�(a) Communication from Dorsey Law Firm Regarding Legal Responsibility �1 �n on Questions Concerning Tax Increment Financing and Industrial D d Revenue Bonds - Presented by City Administrator Plotz Action - ,/(b) Consideration of Request for Increased Residential and Commercial Refuse Rates by July 1, 1982, from Junker Sanitation Action - J(c) Consideration of Request fo Block off a Section of McLeod Avenue for an Auction by Fahey Sales Agency Inc. Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject `,/(d) Consideration of Request for City Accountant to Attend Training Session for Election Supervisors on June 30. Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject J(e) Consideration of Claim by Mary Lou Fuchs for Compensation for Sewer Backup. Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject J(f) Consideration of Request for Randy DeVries to Attend Minnesota Wastewater Operators Association Institute on August 3,4,5. Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject v � 4 COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 22, 1982 Page 2 V(g) Consideration of Request from Millpond Community Players for Use of Old Firehall for (1) Storage (2) Set Construction (3) Presentation of Play, in Summer 1982. Action - �(h) Consideration of Request by Tim Krasen for Repairs to Oakwood Lane (by Appearance before Council)�� Action - 6. Resolutions and Ordinances ✓(a) Consideration of Ordinance No. 6/82 - An Ordinance to Allow Parking on the East Side of Franklin Street between Washington Avenue and First Avenue Southwest (West Side of Old Fire Station) �a�A an �tn�daM (to be provided by City Attorney) Action - Waive first reading and set second reading for 7 -13 -82 /(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 7195 - Resolution to Purchase Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject �) Consideration_of Resolutions Numbers 7141 through 7167 - Resolutions Ordering Preparation -of- Assessment Rolls Numbers 125 through 151 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject /(d) Consideration of Resolutions Numbers 7168 through 7194 - Resolutions for Hearings on Proposed Assessment Rolls Numbers 125 through 151 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject 7. Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions ,/(a) Minutes of Planning Commission dated May 18, 1982 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing �b) Minutes of Senior Advisory Board dated April 28, 1982 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing ,lC�l .� W� P�T I R `a. if 0 0 0 COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 22, 1982 Page 3 8. Unfinished Business �(a) Consideration of First Avenue Southwest, Nemitz Property (DEFERRED 6 -8 -82) Action - 9. New Business J(a) Consideration of Purchase of Portable Radios and Police Scanner Radio Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject Ab) Consideration of Request for Conditional Use Permit Submitted by Jack Kjos, with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject J(c)- Consideration of Request for Conditional Use Permit Submitted by Mr. Hoversten /Mr. Cornell with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to approve with. - Contingencies - Motion to reject A(d) Consideration of Request Submitted by Staff for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 464 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject J) Consideration of Delinquent [dater and Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service ►/(f) Consideration of Authorization to Advertise for Bids for Lighting Southeast and Southwest Fields of Fred Roberts Park Action--Motion to approve - Motion to reject �g) Consideration of Authorization to Accept Low Bid for Resurfacing High School Tennis Courts Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject ✓(h) Option for Consideration of Scheduling Tax Increment Hearing on Park Square Properties, Ed McCormick and Ron McGraw, Partners, Commonly Known as the S &L Project (Requested by Mayor DeMeyer) Action - COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 22, 1982 Page 4 10. Miscellaneous /(a) Communications from City Administrator 11. C1aimA, Appropriations and Contract Payments ,/(a) Verified claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds /12. Adjournment w 0 0 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 1982 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Mayor DeMeyer at 7:30 P.M., with the :following present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, and Alderman Ted Beatty, in addition to Mayor James G. DeMeyer. Absent: Alder4nan Ken Gruenhagen. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Attorney James Schaefer and City Engineer Marlow V. Priebe. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Rev. Curtis Peterson. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the Regular Meeting dated May 25, 1982, were approved as amended and the minutes of the Bid Opening dated June 1, 1982, were approved as presented on*a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman John Mlinar and carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - None. 5. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) OPTION TO REVIEW PAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING AND REPORTS OF LAST CITY COUNCIL MEETING (REQUESTED BY MAYOR DEMEYER) Mayor DeMeyer stated that a family emergency had required that he be absent from the previous Council meeting. He requested that City Administrator Plotz review for him a number of items from that meeting. City Administrator Plotz stated that action was taken concerning a Public Hearing for Industrial Revenue Bonds for the S &L Project involving Jim and Dick McClure. Since that time, it has been determined that there are additional limited partners involved in the project and it will be necessary to start the Public Hearing process over again, with the Public Hearing to be held on July 13, 1982. City Administrator Plotz further reported concerning the Amendment to the Tax Increment Financing Plan, stating that Attorney Mahoney had responded to questions. With changes and deletions, a total of $135,000 was approved. Mayor DeMeyer and,City Attorney Schaefer then reviewed the information that only a full time law firm specializing in tax increment can be considered "expert" in the area. The Dorsey law firm serves as our bond consultant and in this capacity represents the city to the extent of drafting marketable documents. It is their responsibility to make 3, COUNCIL MINUTES ,TUNE 8, 1982 Page 2 sure th e: documents are legal. They do not render judgments as to whether projects are "good" or "bad." At the request of Mayor DeMeyer, Attorney Schaefer then read the Tax Increment Law from _M:S.A. 273.74, Subd. 3 and 4. Referring to a finding on project classification determinations which had been prepared earlier by Clarence Simonowicz, Mayor DeMeyer stated his belief that the City should have proceeded according to a different process. In response to a question by Mayor DeMeyer, City Administrator Plotz pointed out that the difference between general obligation and revenue bonds had been discussed by consultant Fahey, and that on a project the size of the S &L Project, the interest would be about $20,000 more on a revenue bond. There ensued further lengthy discussion concerning the definition of development districts vs. redevelopment districts and the need for clarification on this point as it affects Hutchinson's 4 areas in Redevelopment District No. 4. Members of the audience entered into a discussion with Council members and the City Attorney concerning litigation in another city, past state legislative actions, and the laws governing tax increment. City Attorney Schaefer stated that this Council is being asked to review an administrative decision of a prior Council. He advised this Council must be careful in examining a prior action, since there is legitimacy in a prior action and it is dangerous to second guess a prior Council decision. Both consultants advised at the last Council meeting that Hutchinson's district is in fact "redevelopment." At the conclusion of further dialogue, Mayor DeMeyer read an exerpt from a League of Cities publication on the powers of city councils and reiterated that it is the Council's obligation to run-the City legally. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR SENIOR CENTER COORDINATOR TO ATTEND INSTITUTE ON AGING, JUNE 9 -10, 1982. Following discussion, the request was approved on a motion by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, and carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FIRE MARSHAL TO ATTEND INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ARSON INVESTIGATORS MINNESOTA CHAPTER AND FIRE MARSHALS ASSOCIATION MEETINGS ON JUNE 9, 1982. Following discussion, the request was approved on a motion by ` Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Beatty, and carried unanimously. r • COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 8, 1982 Page 3 • (d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE BY CARMEN FEDIE, A communication was received from Carmen Fedie, 136 Washington Ave., requesting permission to set up an art stand in Library Square to display her paintings and- drawings. Ms. Fedie was not present to answer questions concerning the times she might wish to do this. In the absence of adequate information concerning the request a motion was made by Alderman °Mliner to reject the request. Motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE FOR PORK COOKOUT KING CONTEST ON JUNE 19, 1982 A communication was received from the McLeod County Pork Producers for the use of Library Square for the Pork Cookout King Contest during the Water Carnival. Request was approved on a motion by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Beatty, and carried unanimously. 6. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES None 7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (a) BUILDING OFFICIAL'S MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1982 There being no discussion, the report was ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (b) MINUTES OF PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD DATED APRIL 7, 1982, APRIL 23, 1982, AND MAY 5, 1982 There being no discussion, the minutes-.were or &red by the Mayor to be received for filing. (c) MINUTES OF NURSING HOME BOARD DATED APRIL 22, 1982 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) SIX EAST REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (DEFERRED MAY 25, 1982) Receipt of a complete report on assistance which the City of Hutchinson has received from Six East Regional Development Commission was noted. City Administrator Plotz provided this report which showed that the City had benefited either directly or indirectly from the assistance and resources of Region 6E in the amount of at least $1,882,378 since late 1976. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 8, 1982 Page 4 Alderman Beatty moved to reject the County Commissioners' request that Hutchinson withdraw from Region 6E. Motion was seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously. City Administrator Plotz was instructed to send a copy of the report to the County Commissioners. (b) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST AVENUE SOUTHWEST, NEMITZ PROPERTY (DEFERRED MAY 25, 1982) Item deferred to next regular.meeting. (c) CONSIDERATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (S &L PROJECT) Due to the addition of limited partners in the S. &L Project, it is necessary to set a new public hearing date for the project. Date was set for July 13, 1982 at 8:00 p.m. on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MAINTENANCE OF NORTHWEST (GOLF COURSE) WATER TOWER (DEFERRED JUNE 1, 1982) Low bid received for maintenance of the northwest water tower was from Odland Protective Coatings of Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the amount of $13,950.00. Bid was awarded on a motion by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Beatty, and carried unanimously. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CIVIC ARENA TWO -YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 423 AND CITY OF HUTCHINSON Terms of the two -year lease agreement were summarized by City Administrator Plotz. Rental for 1982 -1983 will be $9625, with a 10% increase in .1983 -84, subject to continuation of the hockey program. The new contract has more flexibility in scheduling hours than past contracts. Alderman Beatty made a motion to approve and authorize signing of the agreement. Motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously. (b)CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS There were no requests for extension of payment period. Alderman Mlinar made a motion to discontinue service at 12:00 noon on Monday, June 14, for accounts 20- 0065 -0 - -00 and 26- 0215 -0 -00. Motion was seconded by Alderman Carls and - carried unanimously. W. • 9 COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 8, 1982 Page 5 (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR "BLANKET" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE BY JAYCEES FROM JUNE 12 TO AUGUST 29, 1982 _ Communications with the Chief of Police indicate his concern with City responsibility for an "on- sale" situation in parks and buildings when minors are present. On recommendation of the Chief.of Police, Alderman Carls moved to reject the request. Motion was _ s -econded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF RESERVE POLICE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT The Chief of Police requested that two individuals.be added to the roster of (unpaid) Police Reserves. They are Michael J. Buske and Jeffrey M. Kaping. Request was approved on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Carls, and carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING OPTION CONTRACT FOR MASONIC TEMPLE PROPERTY, Jim McClure addressed the Council, stating that with the planned restaurant facility in the S &L project, additional parking ' is -a need. It would be advantageous to do parking lot construction concurrently with the other building. Alderman Beatty moved.to authorize taking an option on the Masonic Temple property for not more than $100 and amended the motion to state that the purchase price should be no more -than the $160,000 appraised value. Motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously. City Administrator Plotz and City Attorney Schaefer were directed to negotiate a lower price, if possible. (f) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING OPTION CONTRACT FOR FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN, PARCELS A,B, AND C, INCLUDING LEASE -HOLD AND FIXTURE APPRAISALS After discussion, Alderman Mlinar made a motion to authorize an option contract for no more than $100. Motion was amended to separate any or all parcels. Motion was,seconded by Alderman Beatty, and carried unanimously. City Administrator Plotz and City Attorney Schaefer were authorized to negotiate the contract. (g) CONSIDERATION OF PARK DEPARTMENT WEED EATERS Parks & Recreation Director Ericson reported on the poor condition of the Weed Eaters. He recommended replacement with two Toro machines for a total of $558. Since it is not a budgeted item, it would be paid from the contingency account. Request was approved on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 8, 1982 Page 6 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ENGINEER PRIEBE City Engineer Priebe presented a brief discussion on the 1983 section of the current 10 -year public works improvemen program and noted that it would be further discussed at the next regular Council meeting. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR PLOTZ City Administrator Plotz reported he has discussed City insurance coverage with Madson insurance Agency. Additional coverage which might be considered includes umbrella, police officer liability, and pollution liability. Quotes will be made available on the various coverages. City Administrator Plotz further reported that a morning meeting time would be established to discuss the request of the Chief of Police for needed items in the police department. Concerning improvement project 82 -41 (Second Avenue) at $154,000 cost, the City Administrator reported that due to this project's being dropped, reimbursement from improvement bonds for engineering costs would be $8,000 less than the first_ projection. It was noted that total improvement projects planned for 1984 will be considerably less than the current year. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE RALPH NEUMANN Maintenance Director Neumann reported the City street crews are presently doing repairs on Washington Avenue in conjunction with the railroad. , (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY SCHAEFER City Attorney Schaefer reported cbncerning the lawsuit by Building Constructors Inc. (BCI). Toe final hearing before the judge has been held and the City Attorney has entered into an informal agreement with attorney for BCI not to appeal the judge's decision in order to expedite settlement. After the judge's decision, the City could rebid the project or award the contract to the winner. • COUNCIL MINUTED JUNE 89 1982 Page 7 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS, AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS it With the exception of a claim from Elecgro- Watchman which is to be further verified, claims were approved for payment from appropriate funds on a motion by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. on a motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously. 0 M ( 612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON % 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 June 11, 1982 Mr. Jerry Mahoney, Attorney Mr. Jerry Gilligan, Attorney Dorsey, Windhorst, Hannaford, Whitney & Halladay 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Attorneys Gilligan and Mahoney: On June 8, 1982, the City Council discussed the topic of tax increment financing. There were some additional questions raised that I request your written response on by June 17th: EXISTING PLAN 1) Is the City of Hutchinson Tax Increment District No. 4 a Redevelopment District? 2) Specifically, was: District 4 considered in "totality" in applying the formation criteria of Minnesota Statutes 273..73, Subd. 10? 3) In the event the characteristics and criteria of the entire district are legally tied in " totality," as the attached Project Classification Determination.( legally constructed to properly meet at least one and/or more of the statutory tests of Minnesota Statutes 273.73, Subd. 10? 4) On August 28, 1979, the City originally established District 3 (Industrial Park area) as an economic development district. Thereafter, was it legal to consolidate District 3 along with Districts 1, 2, and the shopping center /mall area into�a total redevelopment designation for District 4? (2) 5) Can a TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT have both an economic development and redevelopment area within it, thereby splitting the district to allow for both redevelopment and economic development designations? 6) If Area 3 or 4 of District 4 were dropped, does this affect the contractual relationship of the bondholders of the Senior Citizens Center /Railroad Connector Tract project(s)? If it is possible to drop Area 3 or 4 of District 4, what nn � Mr. Jerry Mahoney, Attorney Mr. Jerry Gilligan, Attorney Page 2 is the effective date of a newly formed economic development district and the date utilized for the certification of value(s)? Furthermore, what are the potential revenue ramifications in relation to the full faith and credit of the City on the bonds? S &L TAX INCREMENT RESOLUTION 1) Does the approved tax increment amendment (attached) need any further clarification as to findings listed in Minnesota Statutes 273.74, Subd. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)? (See attached.) 2) Does the 105% rule on tax increments need to be cited in the amendment? 3) Please compare the format of amending Resolution No. 6551 and 6626 (attached) that Clarence Simonowicz utilized with the recently approved Resolution No. 7140 (attached) for the S &L Project, prepared by Ehlers Associates and Dorsey. Please indicate if the latter is sufficient. 4) Since there is going to be a "re- start" of the public hearings for the industrial revenue bonds for the inclusion of limited partner(§)., will the limited partner(s) be required to be named in the resolution? What is the disclosure require- ment, if any? 5) In view of the re -start of procedures for the industrial revenue bonds, does any part of the tax increment proceeding need to be done over, changed, or amended in view of the limited partnership inclusion and /or the 5% equity position of Jim and Dick McClure? Looking forward to hearing from you by June 17, so we can enclose your response in the council packet. Thank you. Sincerely, enclosures G� Gary D. Plotz hs City Administrator (1) and (2)This document was reviewed with Attorney Mahoney, Bill Fahey, Clarence Simonowicz, Ken Merrill and myself at a meeting prior to the amendment to the Plan for the consolidation of Districts 1, 2, & 3 and the addition of Area 4 within District 4. It was also reviewed again by Clarence Simonowicz and the City Council, prior to the consideration of the designation and adoption of Redevelopment District 4. 0�) Couna*1,r'en§ ases axincre en t, fi By JULIE HAAG Staff Writer Marathon sessions — entwined with frequent disputes — have monopolized the Hutchinson Ci- ty Council in recent months and Tuesday night's meeting was no exception. The most heated debate stemmed from the pro- posed use of tax increment financing for the development of the S & L site in downtown Hut- chinson. For more than one hour the issue was the "hot potato" — tossed between council members, city staff, fiscal consultant Bill Fahey, developer Jim McClure and audience member Gayle Wick. �It's been about five months since we first ap- ached the council," said McClure, represen- ting Miller, Miller and Mac Construction of Hut- . chinson. "We now have a sound, workable pro- ject." Two-thirds of the proposed tenants of the building have been identified, he said, adding that his firm is now interested in completing the base- ment and helping the tenants finish off their areas. Because of this, Miller, Miller and Mac re- quested an additional $400,000 in industrial revenue bonds to finance the additional im- provements. "Industrial revenue bonds are not related to the tax increment proposal," fiscal consultant Bill Fahey said in response to a question by Mayor J im DeMeyer. The bonds stand on the merit of the company with the property used for security, he added. The city's involvement entails lending its name and tax exempt status to the bonds, DeMeyer felt the increase was too 'substantial when considering the added improvements. However, in a 4 -1 vote, the council approved the Miller, Miller and Mac request. Most of the debate centered on tax increment financing for the project with the following break down: property acquisition, $160,000 less $70,000 for the sale of the . property; utility service, $10,000; beautification, $40,000; cost of issuance, $7,000 and capitalized interest, $28,000. Council members Ken Gruenhagen, John Mlinar, Ted Beatty and Mike Carls questioned the $40,000 beautification cost' but expressed will- ingness to advance the proposal to the public hearing where it could be resolved. "It could probably be 'done on an assessment na:n- basis but for the purposes o ,the�`hearing 1 don't see any problem with including it in the process," Beatty said. "I have a feeling that no matter what happens in the area of tax increment financing there won't be anything done that will be approved by our mayor simply because maybe he has a feeling against tax increment. But mainly my belief is he'd just as soon not see anything done in the downtown development area. "I don't think we'll get anything done until the term of J im DeMeyer has expired," he added. The mayor responded to Beatty's assertions. "I have asked time and time and-time again about the status of documents concerning this ci- ty and I am still burdened with many unanswered See Council /Page 3 I• � y x .. . . 4 ' na:n- basis but for the purposes o ,the�`hearing 1 don't see any problem with including it in the process," Beatty said. "I have a feeling that no matter what happens in the area of tax increment financing there won't be anything done that will be approved by our mayor simply because maybe he has a feeling against tax increment. But mainly my belief is he'd just as soon not see anything done in the downtown development area. "I don't think we'll get anything done until the term of J im DeMeyer has expired," he added. The mayor responded to Beatty's assertions. "I have asked time and time and-time again about the status of documents concerning this ci- ty and I am still burdened with many unanswered See Council /Page 3 C' Council continued from page 1 questions," DeMeyer said. "I'm not against the downtown. If 1 could get a clean slate you'd see me perform. As it sits, the questions are unanswered and we're marching on." "May I ask the mayor why these questions aren't answered ?" Wick said from the audience. He referred to Fahey, City Attorney Jim Schaefer and City Administrator Gary Plotz as experts in the area. - r "Why don't you get those. questions answered right now ?" Wick continued. "Either they can answer them or they're not experts." Wick cautioned council members about Fahey's advice. "Bond people push these things' because they get a commission," he said. "If you use him as an advisor remember his business is selling bonds. He isn't against,lhe project but would like to see tax increment used in the proper perspective so the city isn't on the tail end for collateral, Wick 0 "Who's running this meeting ?" Carls asked the mayor. "I'll take the chair," DeMeyer said. Wick finished his sentence and sat down. All four aldermen voted to proceed with the public hearing with the mayor voting against the motion. ' "I'm not against the downtown. If could get a dean slate you'd see me, perform." — Mayor Jim DeMeyer. The council also moved to refer the amend- ment to the tax increment plan to the Hutchinson Planning Commission, School Board, Downtown Development Advisory Board and McLeod Coun- ty Board of Commissioners. DeMeyer cast the lone vote against the action. W Z s n - n r N N ' In other the action the council: _ But mainly my belief is he'd just as 'Granted a 1Qyear franchise to Mark McGraw to in soon not" See anything done in the operate a popcorn and concession stand Library Square during the summer months. downtown development, area_." — DeMeyer voted against the action objecting to the length of the franchise: Alderman Ted Beatty. •Granted a 60 -day demolition permit extension to Melvin Klockmann. Snow fencing must be placed Both Schaefer and Plotz said they were willing around the area and a $1,000 deposit will be re- to answer any questions. Council members were in to both men. quired. •Set a new hearing date of May 11 for a number. asked to submit questions writing The only written inquiries thus. far came from of 1982 improvement projects. •Reviewed bids for the Water Treatment Plant ad Mlinar, Schaefer said, adding that they required a dition. The bids will be let May 11. great deal of research. ' "How long have you had those questions from *Awarded the bid for the concession stand at Mr. Mlinar ?" Wick asked. 1 Roberts Park to C & R Grocery. •Approved five amendments to the Comprehen- "Since April 8," Schaefer replied. "Experts in the field shouldn't take more than a day to answer them," Wick said. "Either that or sive Plan. - •Approved the hiring of Daniel T. Hatten as a you don't know the subject." -_ Wick asserted much of the financial dif- part -time police officer. *Authorized City,Engineer Marlow V. Priebe to also ficulties of school districts in the state were caus- prepare specifications and plans for a turn lane at the intersection' of South Grade Road ,and Dale ed by tax increment districts: "Tax increment with the general obligation , Street. Delmar Pittman has offered to donate the feature is dangerous," he said. "There are schools property needed. *Allocated up to $500 to the research committee affected right now." Mlinar made a motion to set the public hearing on the old armory. increases for city employees for the project May 25 and Beatty seconded the *Tabled any merit due to the state of the budget. motion. - , _ _. DeMeyer once again asked for discussion. Carls *Approved a motion to send a payment of $10,000 to,Ken Lever, one of the developers of the questioned Fahey about the affects of tax incre- ment on, the school district. The only portio of _ Evergreen complex, within five days. The pay - stemmed from cost of excavating manmade local school funding influencedd is capital outlay — used to purchase equipment and maintenance,' ment obstacles from the site. The council, authorized its last meeting. However, according to Fahey. to respond to the�staternent and the payment at DeMeyer instructed city staff'to delay mailing the Wick rose there was once again an exchange of words check until the city receives a release of its the site. The council opted to seek between he and council members. obligations'for the of liability but to pay the bill, conten- "Call the question," Beatty said. - "Excuse me Mr. Beatty, but I have the floor," release ding other funds had been withheld for that pur- DeMeyer cast the lone vote against the mo - Wick retorted. .. � pose. "Point of order. The discussion is now up here � tion - 1 m chaefe_r a.�_eit�attornex throuu�h _ amongst council members," Beatty said, • 'APP ointed .L5 'Dec "Point` of "order,".Widc, answere8. "I fiave the 31:, - "nor. You're out of order -Mr. Beatty: I'll-call you - `odd ' from !igfe j ?, tiaa'= t ' .�...' �wi n f� �� f t. k.YT'..u. .a 1 -.. f.�s.a •✓ . r..- .w... w..6 rs iur... I� '... � .. .., r. ... -... ... _i.:i� w- .,.,..b� '.se• r A. egal opinion.s.,, ray JULIE HAAG Staff Writer Legal opinions of a bond counselor and an attorney from the state auditot's office will be sought to try to resolve ques - !ions concerning the pledging of j tax increment bonds in Hutchin- son. The City Council took the ac- tion during a special meeting Wednesday following a two- ho presentation by fiscal con - sv Bill Fahey, representing the firm of Ehlers and Associates Inc. of Minneapolis. Fahey discussed avenues to provide tax increment financing f sought 1 n x incre ent'.bonds for the development of the S & L site proposed by Miller, Miller and Mac Construction of Hut- chinson, However, some questions have to' be answered first, accor- ding to Mayor Jim DeMeyer. lie is not attempting to block the project, the mayor said, but a satisfactory interpretation ' of language used on the face of the bond must be given before he will sign anything. DeMeyer was referring to a section on the face of the bond stating "the City has agreed to pledge all tax increment revenue derived from the District to the payment of the bonds." It's the word "all" that concerns the mayor. According to that wording no other tax increment financing can be used until the bonds sold to develop the Evergreen /Senior Citizen Center complex are paid, according to DeMeyer. "I can't proceed until the principal holders of these bonds give the green light," he said. Fahey doesn't feel it is the in- tent of tax increment to be used one project at ra time. Similar language is used by cities throughout the state, he said. The problem appears to deal. .._.. . only wth the wording on the face of the bond. A section in the bond resolution states the city reserves the right to sell ad- ditional bonds, Fahey pointed out, An amendment passed .in' June 1981 also broadens the tax increment power of the city. However, because the amend- ment was passed after the Evergreen bonds were pledged, DeMeyer feels its not proper, "As far as I'm concerned there's no amendment," he said. "The only people who can amend it are the bond holders." In recent months, DeMeyer has proposed a procedural audit by the state auditor's office to answer the questions. However, council members are hesitant to seek the audit since the cost of the procedure is not known. Fahey said the council's ques' tions should be addressed to the bond counsel because they per- tain to legal interpretations. City Attorney Jim Schaefer outlined three options the council could take. *Present formal, written ques- tions to the Dorsey firm and have them respond in writing. •Cet a second legal opinion. *Request a procedural audit. .,y r I The council chose to combine two of Schaefer's suggestions. The opinion of the Dorsey, Win - dhorst, Hannaford, Whitney and Halladay office was included r since they are reputable and authored the wording on the face of the bond. The state auditor's office was included to provide an impartial opinion. Cost of the inquiry is not to ex- ceed $1,000. 1 , #„ Council members were asked to 'submit questions concerning., tax increment bonds to City Hall* by Monday. Inquiries will be for- warded to the bond counsel and the state auditor's office. 3r&L.fi*nance p council,.. backing Staff Writer '91cm" Miller, Miller and Mac Inc.'s plans for redeveloping the S &L site in downtown Hutchinson for retail, restaurant and office space received a financial go ahead Tuesday from the Hutchinson City Council. Followin g two P 6 public hearings, the council approved $135,000 in tax increment financing for the project and $900,000 in industrial revenue bonds. It was a major hurdle for developers Jim and Dick McClure. He was "very pleased" with the council's actions, Jim McClure aid. With the city's backing, the industrial revenue bond portion of the plan will be submitted to the state for approval of the tax ex- empt status and the developers also will finalize financing of the project. If all goes well, construction should begin in July, according to ' McClure. He also identified a number of possible retail tenants for the first floor of the building including an electronics business, ' barber, beautician, magazine and tobacco store, optometrist and a gift shop. " The basement of the structure is expected to house Le Bistro Cafe. It would be the newest addition to a group of restaurants cur- rently operating in Minneapolis, St. Paul and Rochester, Le Bistro's will feature a lounge, banquet room and dining area. g Retail stores should be ready for occupancy Nov. 1 followed by F the restaurant Dec. 1 and second floor offices Feb. 1, 1983, McClure said. Gayle Wick was the only member of the audience to speak dur- ing the public hearing. rr "I have a few questions about the district itself," he said. re Wick asked bond counselor Jerry Mahoney, of the Dorsey Law H Firm and fiscal consultant Bill Fahey, of Ehlers and Associates Inc., c about the difference between tax increment redevelopment and economic development districts. He told the council he'd been in fr contact with a man in Eden Prairie who sued that city concerning a tax increment plan. t Both Fahey and Mahoney declined to answer Wick's questions m directly. Alderman Ken Gruenhagen, chairing the meeting in the absense of Mayor Jim DeMeyer, reminded Wick that this was a fr hearing before the council. sa Fahey later discussed the Eden Prairie situation with council cr 71' aeveiopment district was a corn field. Following a ruling by a ennepin County judge, the city appealed the decision with the ase progressing to the Minnesota Supreme Court, Eden Prairie eventually changed the description of the district om redevelopment to development and the lawsuit was dropped. In a related agenda item, Pat Mikulecky questioned Mahoney on he difference between'tax increment revenue bonds and tax incre- ent general obligation bonds. Revenue bonds are payable solely from tax increments derived om the district. General obligation bonds are repaid in much the me manner. However, a municipality also pledges its full faith,, edit and taxing power if the increments don't generate enough to Mahoney said it is rare that tax dollars are used. Often a city Will make up the difference from another fund until the district generates the necessary profits to repay the debt. — The majority of cities in Minnesota use general obligation bonds because it provides an extra security to bondholders and allows a municipality to receive a lower interest rate -- usually about 2 per- cent. In the case of S &L, a difference of about $20,000. . Industrial bonds are not related to tax increment financing, ac- cording to Fahey. The city's involvement entails lending its name and tax exempt status to the bonds which stand on the merit of the company with the property used for security, 'a -er de've1opmen,t,,,"dh:`,' S -Y P4, HYCHUCKWARNER' ty'as the dominant commercial' excIusl'on o .mobile/,` preli'minary4,; plat 'i':fdr',1tL1pke,, Publisher force within it's serviqe area." - f h rade" A S&L commercial develop. The Hutchinson City Council*,.', cifles The 'amended state'-�'Roacl from the Civic Aren`a',.Thel-,Y. ment in relation to the city's is considering revising Its tax In- i"s, 'il6n h regula becomes 'effective!,," I lull comprehensive plan, a 'change crement developmL-nt program;, August .0 bank,. The,,"attorney noted, that 1 41-0 in state law - -in regard to and finance manufactured -- n . , . � ~^� would ' - - � ' _' . ' '' . -_--,-�- .-`-.' ---,_- -----''--- —_'-_—� ok — '—- for land going toward a nt�et ' He presented the,, homes are uf6`.6ab|e and there 1 � two ' � extention, and a review of Commission with a fact sheet.� -is speed ' preliminary plat for Wright The city would pay $160,000 to."., 'site without: the, diloys 'iccom% street extensiori, which yyei�f eeO,� I-states were featured In Tues- acquire the land which In turn panyIng constructinga home on Is no benefit to us," FlynnKtold (lay's meeting of the Hutchinson would be sold to the devel'oper site.' H6w said-Upkeshould 'not have I to., I'llanning Commission, for $70,000,, The \- remaining It was noted tha"Vion'es. with I n1l., City Administrator Gary Plotz $90,000—along with $10,000 for the city are reserved for certain pay for the streeti but instead explained* Miller, Miller' and%'.' utility service to the property;., ,types, of... structures.;-: single', ,"should receive $9,000'for the Mac's proposal for the,'S&L $40,000 for sidewalks, lighting,,' family, , m6litiple, familyl- com-..�, land which would be taken up, building in downtown Hutchin-'�; 'trees; $7,000 cost of Issuance; 1, merical industrial,. etc. The of-`,� by the street, son. Plans call for a restaurant in and $28,000 capltallzed� �.flcials ,to Ahe:,,, Noting that, there 'has,, not the basement area, five retail interest—would be taken care',�',�:commisslo I n, 'and -.the - Z commis-� been a, practice of,,compen- . outlets on the ground floor and of as, part of,the clevelopmenC.":'sion urged the.,cit council to'!`.'.sating for streets,. the, commis-�' offices on the second floor. district tax increment financing', 'reserve some zones for, homes,�'. sion approved the, prellminary,'`f According to the city's com-,,,,,. plan, which �1,me,et .-the't Uniform "'plat but refused'to go along with,) prehensive plan and the The. commlssloq' de'�6'rrm6ed!'-,�:'Building Code;',;.ist'a61ish ". R-4 "I'l" Flynn's request for the $9,0010' downtown study, issued in 1977, that the S&L pl�n,',fit Into the'O�,zone for'mixed hbuslng where a'',-' Wrlghtls, Estate$r:� I$ OUtslde] ' '"^^ said. "The major u""' ^~^r'~'^^^'~^ plan, °^~ '^ ~~^ i` ---~ ' ~^^ ~"^~. . stated | ��e | | to � ,,,,,advanced to, the.' council tn' own tne . the concentration of , �e situated; := the city, Cityl, desirable commercial, govern- com' mission didddnot issue an establish , R-5 �zone for , mobile 'Engineer Priebe stated it might mental and other appropriate opinion as to the financing of, rhome park'i. In a mobile home be wise to clustcoat the street, park the,.owner of the mobile, but he recommended approval,. development In the downtown the project,' . "I I area, to reinforce existing ac- Hutchinson currently has ;,a'n',-' home in most instances'do6 nQt,'f,'tlt yyas granted,i' tivities and discourage Jurther,,'orclinance governing location of 'own the land,-. fragmentation and de* central iza,', , mobile homes, At its last ses- Pat Flynn, -.'attorne " y for - John` tion of commercial activities,,tsion, the Minnesota Legislature' Lipke'and The, First State'Bank.1 passed a law which prohibits the'., of Stewart,. presented the"; and to aid in maintaining the ci-',i ICI 07^ 'l0/u � �� , ~ I/ ), I • • City reviews S&L tax increme, 0 proposal with , count schools financing, neither the school district nor county receive any the additional tax revenue from the property until the project is paid for. I I.- . •Because of the frozen tax base, some commissioners and school board officials have ob- jected to tax increment pro- posals in the past — feeling Three local government units set aside time Tuesday to hear presentations and ask questions concerning tax increment finan- cing. While the City Cpuncil listen- ed to a general overview of tax` " `increment financing, City Ad- ministrator Cary.Plotz and fiscal consultant Bill Fahey outlined a .f: tinancing tool was designed for projects like this.. "It's healthy for everyone in the county when development occurs," Because the S & L site has been unoccupied for a number of year, its assessed value is on the decline. Latest figures set it at $21,000. _ ,+ The county will benefit specu rc proposal for school and their constituents outside of because the tax increments county officials.. Hutchinson are subsidizing the won't. be frozen until the Plotz and Fahey zeroed in on ' city with the deferred taxes. $36,000 mark. =' the use of the financing tool for Supporters of tax increment "This will bring 'it back up to the development of the S, & L ` financing have countered this $36,000," Fahey said., 'At least site in downtown Hutchinson. argument, contending that you're gaining back everything Miller, Miller and Mac, everyone benefits in the long that was developers of the S & L site, run because of new jobs and the McLeod County, commis - have requested $175,000 in tax ' increase in tax base. ;' sioners didn't sa Yes or Tw s- increment financing. The School board member _john day hen they 'sal y proposal was redevelopment -, project is .. Ball noted that the 102.3 mill presented. Faced with three op- estimated to cost $1.2 million rate-'in 1981 would have been tions '- yes; -no or no action — with the remaining- funds 100.9 without tax increment the commissioners'chose the lat- primarily coming from the sale financing. "Because of things ` ter.` of industrial revenue bonds.. like this, the mill rate goes" up Michael Auger of- the Min- Under the proposed agree- and it makes it harder to pass a nesota Energy, Planning and ment, the city will purchase the ' referendum for the schools, ", he `said. Development Agency discussed building for $160,000 and sell it �, d with the City the pur- `''to ^Miller, Miller' 'and Mac `for . , Although he would like to see 'Council. poses and history of,tax incre- $70,000.. The remainder of the the project completed, he ment financing.' = taz increment funds' are re would like to have it be financ- It's a tool cities can use to in quested ,_ for , finishing work, ed another way. His motion to itiate a project•primarily when a sewer, utility- service and oppose tax increment financing private owner. can't afford or r beautification for lighting, - failed for lack of a _ second. isn't interested �n ' r'edevelop- sidewalk and trees. ', Other board members noted "ment. Tax increment financing Several of . the council that not voting against the finan- falls into three categories — members objected ` to cing didn't mean they approved ° h o u s' i n g, " e c'o n, o m i c' or beautification and utility * ser- of it. No further action was redevelopment with the cityn vice costs included as part of taken. volved in a regulatory manner, tax increment. However, they The city is obligated to seek according to Auger. ..:.,� voted April '37 to advance the the certification of the school In response to questions from package, to 'a public hearing : district and county boards the council, Auger said he- May, 25 when the' request before 'proceed i ng with the pro- wasn't familiar enough with the -for $175,000 may be reduced. ject. However,' it may proceed h" laws governing the use of ft— assessed value of the pro- ` even if both government units 'object crements for public buildings to perty will be frozen at $36,000 the proposal. , : give-'a specific answer: However, with the future assessed value t "Its a good use of tax- exempt it is "reasonable" to use the estimated 'at $261,500. Under money," Fahey told '. county financing for certain beautifica- the provisions of tax increment commissioners, adding the : tion purposes, he added.' Tau increment ,' caps council debate :again' By JULIE HAAG "".2' , staff Writer ,, Ij•r �„ `i+ ti Tax increment tai Once, again dominated , the ;discussion at" Tuesday night's meeting of the Hutchinson City Council. The matter was placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Jim DeMeyer who was 'absent from the May 45 council meeting when'a "tax Increment' financing plan for development of the S &L site was approved. There are still a number of ' questions plaguing• the mayor concerning past tax increment financing procedures,.._ "It's come to the point I have:-, to ask the council and the'com j munity to help resolve these' issues, DeMeyer, 'said. "I can't '• ",, proceed as it stands," r About 45 minutes was spent '' rehashing! the; •events of the i previous ' council meeting,, y However, the'majority of discus sion centered pn a question pos- ed by audience member Pat Mikulecky',,;conCerning ',the;;,`„ designation of tax increment area four =- The Mall -- as a redevelopment area. He contends the area falls In, ; to the category of 'economic development and therefore should be included in the tax in• crement district for eight years instead of the 25 years involved with a redevelopment project... The' elght�yceri''Fdeslgnation;• would all ow. theschool, district, .''! county and city .•to ''reap the ' benefits' of. the Increased . tax base 17 years, garller, ' he. said,,, (Under *tax lncrement•financi,ng,,,{• the tax ' base;' of a ±;district, , is ,fr'ozen at an assessed ya I ue and any' increas: jis kept within, the district to fi�a�nce tax increment!z_ �projects,),� , . , Mikuletlt and DeMeyer's contention},,�ontrast the deck slon. rea5hed by a former City , Council;�which designated the ..,# area, redevelopment based on' ,ii411 criteria outlined under Min �), nesota statute, f ,It's very dangerous to. s'e•�f,�� t:ond. guess, a former , council,,,,', decision,:' "city attorney ; Jim Schaefer , iaid.' Any , decisions,• could be` overturned by the next, ,I council, therefore making it difO :: '' ficult•.to implement, long -term „',l Projects,,,, Since all'of the city tax in'cre{ ment areas; fall in one district<< „,l the,.S &L prpject could feel the'•�� consequence. The council now , faced', with three options,'4 4 ,maintain, the redevelopment~,. designation on area four, change the entire district to the,? V / �/ • the, iLse,*of..Libraryb;Square ,for clty iOlor:Coq� u yKing gonkestjune. 9 �.. •Seta pu4llc hearing July 13 for' `c e1 ontinued�frompa$i,;•�,�,; ,� r authorizing - Industrial Y• revenue `•i i eight -year economic develop bonds for the S &L project.: A se- or or — if possible — cond public hearing is necessary I designate., areas one tvyp•,and cince- therefore limited partners ' three as redevelopment and Involvbd with; the projet:t,� ► - area four as economic develop-� •Awarded a bid . for .'the "ment. maintenance' of the northwest n b lie',' t r t wer low, bid 'inns �;� .;,No • action was, take „ y .F ,Yva �. ,�Q �+�Th+f: -+ bid,, Was , council. City,admYi ttratprQery`.;,,about ++ $7,000 ►.bflpw. s` the Plotz and. Schaefer ,were, asked:.:( budgeted” cost ofi the project';,''~ research the ,questlon,;:pf�'~;•Approved p,twatyeojr leasq.with''i spliting a tax Increment district the, Hutchinson, school, district; to allovy,, for„ both, redevelop. for use of the Civic.Arena, ,;.`,, o) : R ment i and , economic ;.develop- •Denied a "blanket',,' ;►, non 't ment,designations, into lcating malt, liquor, license j In other action the council;,'., byjthe, jaycees•4or, june 12,to'' ,*Denied a request from the',' August.29, ,. Lj,,W �•, McLeod County Board to sup - ; .*Approved ;,,,the),. addition. H of port, the; Cpmmissjoners.in an,pt• Michaeld. Buske.and jeffrey M. ttempt to call for a publl� hear -• Kaj ing to' the;l <, Hutchinson j ing to dissolve Six East Regional, reserye police force,►,i,l :, II Development" Commission. The *Authorized an- option icontrac ' Council cited the assistance Hut- ) I for the purchase of the Masonic ,r ?chinson has received from the' Temple property,': 'Region Win mgving to deny, "•Authorized, an, option contract' I.L !request, - 'fQr. three parcels owned by First (*Approved a request 'to 'allow ,,J State..Federal Savings and Loan., *,' �` i • RESOLUTION NO. 6551 RESOLUTION FORTING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN, DECLARING PUBLIC PURPOSE, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE, PROVIDING FOR FILING, ADMINISTRATION, AND SPECIAL ACCOUNT WHEREAS: A. It has been proposed that the City of Hutchinson form a development district and adopt a development program and tax increment financing plan therefor under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A and Sections 273.71 to 273-.78 (the Act);- - B. In accordance with the provisions of tie Act, the City Council has consulted with the Planning Commission and the member of the Board of Commissioners of Mc Leod County and the School Board of Independent School District No. 423; C. Said proposal has heretofore been given preliminary-approval by the City Council; and D. A public hearing was duly held on said proposal on this date June 10, 1980 in accordance with the provisions of the Act; - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson as follows: _ 1. Development District. There is established in the City o u c nson a eve opment district to be known as "Development District No. 4, " the boundaries of which are fixed and determined as shown on the attached Exhibit A Incorporated herein by reference. 2. Development Program. The development program for each area of e development district is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is adopted as the Development Program for Development District No. 4. 3. Tax Increment .Financing Plan. T ement financing plan as se or n sa report /is ad as the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Development District No. 4, and the City Council makes the following findings: G' & 0 (a) Development District No. 4 is a redevelopment project as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, thi!- specific basis for such determination being former action by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson regarding Development District No. 1 and No. 2 previously adopted, the attached report and City Council knowledge of the area (b) The Development Program for Development District No. 4, in the opinion of the City Council, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; (c) The Tax Increment. Financing Plan conforms to the general plan -for development or redevelopment -of the City of Hutchinson as a whole; and W- -The Tax Increment-Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City of Hutchinson as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Development District No. 4 by private enterprise; and (e) The City-of Hutchinson elects the method of tax Increment computation *set forth in the Tax-Increment -- Finance Plan. 4. Public Pur ose. The formation of Development District_ No; 14 and a op ion of the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the .State and thereby serves a public purpose. 5. Certification. The Auditor of Mc Leod County is o c requested Ver i y e on anal assessed value of Area 4 of Development District No. � as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original assessed value has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may s ecify, together with a list of all properties within Area of Development District No. 4 for which building permits �-; have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding �J the adoption of this Resolution. C 6. Special Account, There is created a special account des gna a eve opment District No. 4 Tax Increment Account" to be held by the City Treasurer separate and apart from all other accounts of the City into which shall be credited all tax increments received with respect to Development District No. 4 to be used in accordance with the Act and the Tax Increment Financing Plan. 7. Filing. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Development District No. 4 with the State Planning Agency. 8. Administration. The administration of Development District No. s ass gned -to the City- Administrator who shall _ from time to time be granted such powers and duties pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 472A.O9 and 472A.1O as the City Council may deem appropriate. Adopted by the City Council this 16th day of June, 1980. alp D. 4We and Mayor ATTEST: A`e%4G11121 i l� • , City Clerk �f - • 0 M TO RESOLUTION FORMING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN, DECLARING PUBLIC PURPOSE, REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF ORIGINAL ASSESSED VALUE, PROVIDING FOR FILING, ADMINISTRATION, AND SPECIAL ACCOUNT WHEREAS: A. The'City of Hutchinson has formed a development district and adopted a development program and tax increment financing plan therefor under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A and Sections 273.71 to 273.78 (the Act); B. It is proposed that the boundaries of said District be expanded and the Tax Increment Finance Plan be amended; C. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, the City Council has consulted with the Planning Commission and the members of the Board of Commissioners of Mc Leod County and the School Board of Independent School District No..-423; D. Said proposal has heretofore been given preliminary approval by the City Council; and E. A public hearing was duly held on said proposal on this date October 14, 1980 in accordance with the provisions of the Act: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson as follows: 1. Development District. The established Development District in the City o Hu c inson, a .d.evel.opmein.t_ district to be known as "Development District No. 4," is hereby amend- ed in terms of the boundaries of which are fixed and de- termined as- shown -on the attached Exhibt A incorporated herein by reference. 2. Development Program. The amended development program for each area of the development district is on f ile in the office of the City Clerk, is adopted as the Development Program for Development District No. 4. 3. Tax Increment Financing Plan. The tax increment financing plan as set forth in sa report is adopted as the �-, Tax Increment Financing Plan for Development District No. 4, and the City Council reaffirms the following findings: 0 * • (a) Develop ent District No. 4 is a redevelopment project as defined in Ifinnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, the specific bads for such determination being former action by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson regarding Development District No. 1 and No. 2 previously adopted, the attached report and City Council knowledge of the area (bj The Development Program for Development District No. 4, in the opinion of the City Council, would-not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; (c) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for development or redevelopment of the City of Hutchinson as a whole; and (d) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with-the sound needs of the City of Hutchinson as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Development District-No. 4-by private enterprise; and (e) The City of Hutchinson elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in the Tax Increment Finance Plan. 4. Public Purpose. The formation of Development - District - N_o an a op ion of the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up to provide employment opportunities to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves -a public purpose. 5. Certification. The Auditor of Me Leod County is requested to certi y the original assessed value of the amended Development District No. 4 as described in the Tax Increment Financing Plan, and to certify in each year there- after the-amount by which the original assessed value has increased or decreased in accordance with the Act; and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the added area of- Development District No. 4 for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this Resolution. C created a special is cre 6, Special Account. !� Tax Increment account ��des gna a evelopment District No. Account to be held by the City Treasurer whiPhrahalland beapart from all other accounts of the City respect to credited all tax increm. 4s toeDeiusedwinhaccordance with Development District No. Plan. the Act and the Tax Increment Financing 7, Filing. The City Clerk is further authorized and directed to a copy of the Tax Increment Financing A ency. for Development District No. � with the State Planning g e administration of Development $, Administration. Th asp ned to the City Administrator who hall District No. i�- g y owers and duties pursuant to from time to time be granted sueb powers and I}72A.10 as the City Minnesota Statutes' appropriate. Adopted 7 _ Council may deem app p Adopted by the City Co,nncil- this 14th day of October, 1980z— ATTEST: Gary D Plotz City Clerk Ralp D. Westlund- -- May or G • • PROJECT CLASSIFICATION DETER1,11NATIONS The state law regarding tax increment financing requires the city to make a finding that the area included in the tax increment financing plan is either a "Redevelopment Project or, an Economic Development Project or a Housing Project ". It is recommended that the City Council of the - City of Hutchinson make a finding that Development District Flo. 4 is a "Redevelopment Project ". This will then allow the city maximum flexibility in terms of the length of bonds that it can issue. In order to make a finding that the area is a "Redevelopment Project ", certain conditions have to be found which are reasonably distributed throughout the project area. There are=- three.criteria contained in the Mate law -which permit _a project -to be considered a-- - - redevelopment project. These are -'as follows: 1. The land is predominately occupied by - - buildings, streets, utilities or-other improvements and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including out- buildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring renovation or clearance; or - - 2. The land is- predominately occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and 20 percent of the _ buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 30 percent of -the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other Identified hazards to the health, safety and general well being of the community; or 3. The land is not predominantly occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements,--but at least 80 percent of -1- 0 • the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the protect which, when added to the estimated cost of preparing-the land for uses utilities, if any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of said preparation; or 4. The property consists of underutilized air - rights existing over a public street, high - w,ay or right -of -way. Previously the City Council reviewed the conditions which existed in Development (Districts) Areas No. I ad resolution, that they were Redevelop - No. 2 and found, byc was based upon the following ment Projects. This finding informat ion,. 1 contains 81 principal structures, Development- Area No. substantial of these; 77-have been identified as requiring 2 contains_ renovation or- clearance. _ Development Area No. identified The 98 principal structures of which �3 as requiring substantial renovation or clearance. location and distribution of these structures are shown on the attached maps, A as an improved Development_Area No. 3 was identifie 4- -1 any structures in- the deficient- area not con category.- Development Area No. "Redevelopment Project ". following information and knowledge of the affected The - residential properties adjoining Trunk Highway 15 and Gouthgrade Road, which consist of two homesteads, containing a large number of substandard and deficient structures. One of the two principal structures is classified as deficient to a degree requiring renovation or clearance to place it in a desirable marketable els condition. in addition, the two p a contain 11 free - standing out- bujAdinair, 10 of which are in a state lack of_ use or misuse. of the above condition provides that these responsible basis for a finding of being properties fall into the category deficient and in need of renovation. 4 is considered This finding is - the councilmen's area. to be a based upon the general' 1. -2- 2. The larger acerage within Development Area No. 4, exclusive of the homesteads, is a Redevelopment Area falling within the redevelopment criteria based upon the following: a. Partially completed streets and utilities have been built on this acerage based upon a preliminary plat which has now been disregarded. The partial streets and utilities which have been constructed in this area are of an oversized characteristic. Their original design was to accommodate a trailer court,.consequently, excessive utility connections have been installed and wider than normal streets were programmed._7.-Tn its current condition the existence - of__these unused and over— sized public - facilities increase the value of the land beyond economic value for a reasonable use. Their existence is also considered a blight on the land. Qbecause -of the inability of a prudent - developer to put them to an economic use.- b. The area -in its current state is considered to be a blighting influence on the entire community in as much as the lack-of development of the acerage impedes the extension of utilities and other activities which would allow for the normal growth of the community. C. The proposed plan for the use of this property as a shopping center document the need to remove existing streets and utilities. The proposal also documents the need for a major site grading activity which would allow for.the proper drainage of the area and to create on the site a visual amenity desirable--for the proposed use. 0 0 d. The proposed shopping center of 200,000 square feet or more is con - sidered to be of such magnitude that it will have a negative impact (blight • influence) upon the entire commercial community in Hutchinson. The major adverse impace is expected to be on Development Areas 1 and 2. e. Additionally, the area proposed for use by the major shopping center is set back from all major streets and highways. Intermediary housing is proposed to remain which will cause a land use conflict_which will have - serious_ negative impact 'on the existing homesteads. Bayed upon this analysis areas,and itcity is recommended that knowledge of the affected the City Council make a finding that Development District No. 4 is a "Redevelopment Project within the meaning of Cthe Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act. _ Area ,l 27.9 acres Area 2 29.8 acres Area 3 73.5 acres Area 4- - 40.0 acres TOTAL: 171.2 acres 4 -4- 273.73 TAXES; LISTING, ASSESSMENT cessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other identified hazards to the health, safety and general well being of the community; or (3) The land is not predominantly occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements, but at least 80 percent of the total acreage of such land has a fair market value upon inclusion in the project which, when added to the estimated cost of preparing the land for use, including utilities, if any, exceeds its anticipated fair market value after completion of said preparation; or (4) The property consists of underutilized air rights existing over a public street, highway or right -of -way. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean con - taining defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. "Predominantly occupied" shall mean at least 50 percent of the parcels comprising at least 50 percent of the acreage. Subd. 11. Housing project. "Housing project" means a project, or that part of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title 11 of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Ti- tle V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future feder- al, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. Subd. 12. Economic development project. "Economic development project" means any project not meeting the requirements found in the definition of redevelop- ment project or housing project, but which the authority finds to be in the public interest because: (a) It will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their op- erations to another state; or (b) It will result in increased employment in the municipality; or (c) It will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the munici- pality. Subd. 13. Administrative expenses. "Administrative expenses" means all expen- ditures of an authority other than amounts paid for the purchase of land or amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real Js property in the district, relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons resid- ing or businesses located in the district, or amounts used to pay interest on, fund a re- serve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 273.77. [l979c322s3j 273.74 Establishing, modifying tax increment financing plan, annual accounts. Subdivision 1. Tax increment financing plan. A tax increment financing plan shall contain a statement of objectives of an authority for the improvement of a district. The plan shall contain a statement as to the development program for the district, in- cluding the property within the district, if any, which the authority intends to acquire. It shall also contain estimates of the following: cost of the district, including administration expenses; amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; sources of revenue to finance or otherwise pay public costs; the most recent assessed value of taxable real property within the district; the estimated captured assessed value of the district at completion; and the duration of the district's existence. The plan shall also contain a statement of the authority's estimate of the impact of tax increment financing on the assessed values of all taxing jurisdictions in which the district is located in whole or in part. Subd. 2. Consultations; comment and filing. Before formation of a tax incre- ment financing district, the authority shall provide an opportunity to the members of the county boards of commissioners of any county in which any portion of the proposed dis- trict is located and the members of the school board of any school district in which any TAXES; LISTING, ASSESSMENT 273.74 portion of the proposed district is located to meet with the authority. The authority shall present to the members of the county boards of commissioners and the school boards its estimate of the fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district. The members of the county boards of commissioners and the school boards may present their comments at the public hearing on the tax increment financing plan required by subdivision 3. Upon adoption of the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall file the same with the state planning agency. Subd. 3. Municipality approval. No county auditor shall certify the original as- sessed value of a tax increment financing district until the tax increment financing plan proposed for that district has been approved by the municipality in which the project is located. If an authority which proposes to establish a tax increment financing district and the municipality are not the same, the authority shall apply to the municipality in which the district is proposed to be located and shall obtain the approval of its tax incre- ment financing plan by the municipality before the authority may use tax increment fi- nancing. The municipality shall approve the tax increment financing plan only after a public hearing thereon after published notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least once not less than ten days nor more than 30 days prior to the date of the hearing. This hearing may be held before or after the approval or creation of the project or it may be held in conjunction with a hearing to approve the project. Before or at the time of approval of the tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make the following findings: (a) That the project comprising the proposed tax increment financing district is a redevelopment project, a housing project or an economic development project and the specific bases for such determination. (b) That the proposed development or redevelopment, in the opinion of the mu- nicipality, would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably for - seeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (c) That the tax increment financing plan conforms to the general plan for the de- velopment or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. (d) That the tax increment financing plan will afford maximum opportunity, con- sistent with the sound needs of the municipality as a whole, for the development or rede- velopment of the district by private enterprise. (e) That the municipality elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in section 273.76, subdivision 3, clause (b), if applicable. When the municipality and the authority are not the same, the municipality shall approve or disapprove the tax increment financing plan within 60 days of submission by the authority, or the plan shall be deemed approved. When the municipality and the au- thority are not the same, the municipality may not amend or modify a tax increment fi- nancing plan except as proposed by the authority pursuant to subdivision 4. Once ap- proved, the determination of the authority to undertake the project through the use of tax increment financing and the resolution of the governing body shall be conclusive of the findings therein and of the public need for such financing. Subd. 4. Modification of plan. A tax increment financing plan may be modified by an authority, provided that any reduction or enlargement of geographic area, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, increase in the portion of the cap- tured assessed value to be retained by the authority, increase in total estimated tax incre- ment expenditures or designation of additional property to be acquired by the authority shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. The geographic area of a tax increment financing district may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original as- sessed value by the county auditor or five years from August 1, 1979, for tax increment financing districts authorized prior to August I, 1979, except that development districts created pursuant to chapter 472A prior to August 1, 1979 may be reduced but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of designation of such district. Subd. 5. Annual disclosure. For all tax increment financing districts, whether created prior or subsequent to August 1, 1979, on or before July I of each year, the au- thority shall submit to the county board, the school board, the state planning agency Ll • JUNE 10, 1982 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA RE: COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL REFUSE ROMOVAL RATES DEAR SIRS: DUE TO THE RISING COSTS OF OUR OPERATING EXPENSES, AND A SURMOUNTABLE INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF GARBAGE, JUNKER SANITATION'SERVICE IS REQUESTING A RESIDENTIAL INCREASE OF $.45 PER MONTH EFFECTIVE'JULY 1, 1982. THIS REQUEST IS INCLUSIVE OF THE $.10 PER CUBIC'YARD INCREASE THAT WE RECEIVED FROM MCLEOD COUNTY LANDFILL AND WAS EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 1982. IF WE ARE AWARDED THIS INCREASE IT WOULD FIGURE TO BE ABOUT 6% WITHOUT THE LAND- FILL INCREASE TO US. WE ARE ALSO REQUESTING $1.00 PER MONTH PER CONTAINER ON COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS. -FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE WE ARE ENCLOSING-BOTH THE OLD AND NEW RATE SCHEDULE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND COOPERATION IN THIS'MATTER. SINCERELY, JAMES L.- JUNKER, PRESIDENT L/ J "Your Garbologist" James Junker.417 So. Martha St.. Stillwater, Mn. 55082.612 439-7135 COST OF COMMERCIAL CONTAINER SERVICE FOR HUTCHINSON EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1981 1 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $29.00 12 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------ $34.00 2-YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $39.00 3 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $44.00 4 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $49.00 6 -YARD CONTAINER ------------- - - - - -- $64.00 8- YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $79.00 EFFECTIVE JULY 10 1982 PER MONTH PER MONTH PER MONTH PER MONTH PER MONTH PER MONTH PER MONTH 1 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $30.00 PER MONTH - 12 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------ $35.00 -PER MONTH 2 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $40.00 PER MONTH 3 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $45.00 PER MONTH 4 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $50.00 PER MONTH 6 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $65.00 PER MONTH 8 -YARD CONTAINER ------------------- $80.00 PER MONTH I "Your Garbologist" James Junker.417 S*ortha St.. Stillwater, Mn. 55& • 612 439-7135 Jim' AHSALES •/ (J`�.. ('_ti �� - Farms — Hanes Business Places — Appraisals JOE F A H E Y SONS REALTORS and AUCTIONEERS �M -- _- � >__.� r 4 t'?- s+ '9c"1'�.�.�= �a..� ='•ia.�- ._.'�: a_� _<<�._��. �i_f..: s*i "' ��_.__��.�'r, .___.sue .___. 1115 HWY. 7 WEST 121 NORTH MERIDIAN STREET HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 k BELLE PLAINE, MINN. 56011 PHONE Office (612) 5BT3510 ...tw `f! PHONE Office 1612! 873-0467 RESIDENCE 879 -4490 RESIDENCE 873-2857 or 873-6562 V ��June City of Hutchinson 10, 1982 37 Washington Ave We __ -- S1" Hutchinson, Minnesot 5 350 ear City Council; nclosed please find an auction poster for the a tes of Edwin and Sophie ahs.on Saturday June 26. The location of the auctio will e t 46 McLeod venue in Hutchinson. We are requesting permission to block off a short section of eod Avenue so we can conduct part of the auction on the street. -'', We wo d like the street bl eked off from 8 :30 AM until the completion of the au ion sometime that of ernoon. Th action would only effect one nieghbor direc ly accross the street from the ahs home. The owner of this home has given us his permission to go ahead with our plans. Ple a direct this request through the prop r channels and call me at our H chinson office if you have any question I am sure you will have no obj ions. Thank you for your actions on t s matter. tfu l ly; D. Fahey Sales Agency, Inc. ft P if L$ it ii 6 {ll W .✓ L k a f kv IwJP h M ■ n L �n rn e n t -j ousehold - FL#jscellaneous e 4 arge Barg to Fs fat e LOCATED: 46 McLeod Avenue, Hutchinson, Minnesota Vol& IR *% & Z" r �. UA ' _:ommencin 9 at 10 a.m. Sharp 1982 ANTIQUES Oak Rocker Round Back Rocker Wood Drop Leaf Table 2 Old Wood Kegs Depot Bench Leather Top Coffee Table Assorted Small Tables and Stands Kerosene Lamp and Lantern Crusader Steamer Trunk (Ciean) Twin Bed Set 3 Crocks Speckled Crock Bowl Floor Lamps; Candle Holders; 4 Pieces of Carnival Glass ;WWI German Helmet; 2 Cream Cans; Cup and Saucer Sets; Assorted White and Red Glass; 2 Old Van. triioquist Dummys; Cast Iron Kettles; Scythe; Old Torch; Wood Plane; Pewter, Picture Frames and Mirrors; Plus Much More! AUCTIONEERS NOTE: This sale will start at 10 a.m. sharp. Please be on time and plan to spend the dayl Everything is in good condition and must be sold. Be sure to attend as there is something for everyone. LAWN AND GARDEN - "John Deere" -56 6 h.p. Riding Lawn Mower with 30 inch Cut, Like New! "Toro" 24 inch, 5 h.p. Snow Blower - Used Twice! "Wards" 3.5 h.p. Rear Bag Thatcher Mower - New In Box! "Lawn Boy" 19 Inch Power Lawn Mower •• Honda" 5 h.p. Power Lawn Tiller • Cleani Garden Cultivator Garden Tools Garden Fence Lawn Ornaments Scott Fertilizer Spreader WheelBarrow Lunch on Grounds HOUSEHOLD AND MISt;tLUAIVCUU� "General Electric" Refrigerator - Freezer "General Electric" Double Range with Built -In Fan "Zenith" 23 inch Color Console Television (Clean) "Kenmore" Automatic Clothes Washer. (3 Years Old) "General Electric" Clothers Dryer Chest Type Freezer IHC Refrigerator r - 2 Maytag Wringer Washers Duncan Phyfe Tables and Chairs; Kitchen Table and Chairs; Brown Sofa and Chair, Brown Recliner, 5 Drawer Chest; 6 Drawer Chest; Writing Desk; 2 Metal Ward- robes; "White" Electric Sewing Machine in Cabinet; "Westinghouse" Electric Roaster, "Electrolux" Vacuum with Attachments; 2 Electric Brooms; Humidifier, Dehumidifier; Card Tables; Folding Chairs; Roll -Away Bed; Single Bed; "Cold meow Ai Conditioner, re Assorted Kitchen Appliances; Cooker; Many Sets of Dishes; Pots, Pans, Silverware, Pictures, Pitchers, Glasses and Glassware; A Very Large Assortment of Bedding, Blankets, Sheets, Rugs, Pillows, Etc.; Huge Assortment of Yarn and Sewing Supplies; Assorted Towels and Dresser Scarves; Por- table Radios; Assorted Watches and Jewelry; 2 Metal Tables; Bowling Ball; Pole Lamps; Table Lamps; Assor- ted House Plants; Record Player and Records; 8mm Movie Camera, Projector and Screen; Assorted Cameras; Hamper, Assorted Books; Shelves; Clocks, Mirrors, Knick- Knacks, Placques, Etc.; Weber Grill; Large Assortment of Metal and Plastic Coolers; "Junger" OII Stove; Barrel Wood Stove; Lawn Chairs; Cleaning Supplies; Window Fans; AAssorted Christmas Battery Charger; Luggage; Decorations; Bird Bath; Garden Hose; Picnic Table; Car Vacuum; Snare Drum, Tom -Tom and Cymbal; 5 ft., 6 ft. & 12 ft. Step Ladders; Large Assortment of Tupperware; Portable Typewriter In Case; Double Wash Tubs; Hot Plates; Gas Cans; Garbage Cans; Saw Horses; Electric Motors; Plus Hundreds of Other Itemsl EDWIN and SOPHIE MAHS ESTATE, AUCTIONEERS: TERMS: Cash Day of Sale CLERK Fahey Sales Agency, Inc. Cols. Joe Fahey & Sons Realtors and Auctioneers tj% •,� PHONES: Belle Poaj NQ(W Frag7 a (662) 758-4112 j on (612) 587 35'.0, c Tim 70-07 Jim 4317 LICENSE NUMBERS: Joe Sr- 72.342, JoeJr.72 -341, Terry 70.03, , "When you're selling a lifetime, Don't sell it short =Call Fahey's "- 1: t a S t ,./ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: • POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Chief of Police Dean M. O'Borsky Request to block off McLeod Avenue 6 DATE 6-11 -82 have no objection to blocking off the street as requested by James Fahey in the attached memo. He should be advised to contact Ralph Neumann to obtain barricades the night before the auction. I �(612) 587 -5151- - - -- CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 -M .E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 16, 19 82 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, CITY ACCOUNTANT -- - -- r- -- - - -- -- - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- SUBJECT: ELECTION TRAINING -------------------------- - - - - -- The County Auditor has designated the City of Hutchinson as responsible for the training of election judges. This has been my responsibility over the past several years. As part of the requirement, a training session is conducted by the Secretary of State which should be attended to learn of law changes and review of procedures. I would request authorization to attend a one -half day training session on June 30 in St. Cloud. S cQ ----- - - - - -- - -- - -- 7(612) 587 -5151 ITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 16, 1982 'O: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL � FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR gUBjECT= WATER BACKUP - -------------------------------- t Mary Lou Fuchs and her sister had d-a sewer system back up occur when the power was lost at the sewer plant. This problem has since been corrected with the switching to emergency power generator in of power failure. A claim was filed with the City's insurance carrier -which has been denied. The claim is for $66.40 for lost time the Fuchs incurred. I 0 6 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOC@ The Minnesota Wastewater Operators Association is proud to announce it's sixth Annual MWOA Wastewater Operators Institute to be held in St. Paul-, Mn. at the Radisson Hotel on August 4 -6, 1982. The - Institute will be composed of workshops aimed at improved maintenance of collection systems, improved plant operations and problems encountered in the management of waste treatment operations. Since it's inception in 1956 the Minnesota Wastewater Operators Association has grown from less than 50 to over 700 members. The MWOA exists for the advancement of the knowledge of wastewater collection and treatment, as well as the protection of the waters of Minnesota. , The Certification Council will grant training hours for attendance at the Institute for certificate renewal. t TECHNICAL PROGRAM - Tuesday Aug. 3, 1982 Registration for early arrivals _ 6:30 - 8:00 PM - Wednesday Registration Aug. 4, 1982 Welcome and opening address 8:00 - 5:00 Pollution Control in Minnesota today Water the never ending Compound SESSION A SESSION B Pump Alignment & Operation Tour of Metro Plant Pump Curve & Operation Energy Conservation Piping Materials Thursday Nursing an old plant Chlorine leak repair Aug. 5, 1982 Starting a new plant Bearing selection & tub 8:00 - 5:00 Gravity Filtration Odor Control - Sludge Disposal Certifiaction Selection of cleaning Equip. Equipment Display Equipment display Friday _ Plant operation at a paper Selection of protective coating Aug. 6, 1982 mill - Benefits of I/I 8:00 - 12:00 MPCA Viewpoint of an operator Confined space entry. Municipal viewpoint of MPCA. Setting up a Maint. Program Selection of Lubricants S �. t To: Hutchinson City Council - From: Brad Burch, President Millpond Community Players Gentlemen: It is my hope that at this time you would give consideration to a three. part proposal regarding the old fireball. My first request is for space_ to store the theater's set pieces, makeup, etc. This would only re_qutre- the area to the far south and would not use much area i_n that most of the materials can be set against the wall. These materials are safe and require no special treatment. My second request is for the same area to be used for set construction for a summer play. There are a lot of considerations in this area that would have to be ironed out, but I am confident that they could be worked out. The third and last request is the possibility of a play being done at the firehall. This would be a colorful and exciting place to work in and barring technical and legal problems I'm sure it would go over in a big way. The requests I've made here are extensive and will raise many questions so I will attend the council meeting on June 22, 1982 to answer some of these questions. Thank you in advance. gre %31415116- Ur, � N . ( e '�� 9g2 N Brad Burch 6a 8Z L Copy of above letter provided to Building Official and Fire Marshall 6 -18-82 01- t� Gentlemen: We, the undersigned residents of Oakwood Lane, request repairs to the damaged portion of Oakwood Lane to enable us to have a seal coat of G -S:S1 road tar applied to Oakwood Lane in an effort to control the dust problem. We understand that we are responsible for the application "'and cost of the seal coat. i` i '.'� -- /I- " / RESOLUTION NO. 7195 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Nalclear #7122 12 drums 7,142. OSewage Treatment Sewer Yes Nalco Chemical Co. 2 valves 1,069. 2 Sewage Plant Sewer Yes Worthington McGraw The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM I COST I PURPOSE I DEPT. !BUDGET I VENDOR Date Approved: Motion made by: Seconded by: Resolution submitted for Council action by: RESOLUTION NO. 7141 • RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 125 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Bluff Street from 200' to 1,200' North of Waller's Drive by the construction of: the construction of watermain, sanitary sewer, sewer lift station and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. I City Clerk Mayor R 1 � • RESOLUTION NO. 7142 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 126 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. I City Clerk Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7143 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 127 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Atlanta Ave. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment- in-his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. I City Clerk Mayor s RESOLUTION NO. 7144 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 128 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: T.H. 15 from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 12" watermain and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or-parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment,'notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7145 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 129 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7146 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 130 WHEREAS, cost.has been determined for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 6" watermain and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7147 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 131 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 10" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7148 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 132 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7149 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 133 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to 1pe $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in-his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. I City Clerk Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7150 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 134 WHEREAS, cost.has been determined for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk 9 9 RESOLUTION NO. 7151 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 135 WHEREAS, cost.has been determined for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 18" storm sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk • • RESOLUTION NO. 7152 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 136 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7153 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 137 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every- assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7154 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESS24ENT Assessment Roll No. 138 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ Al so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7155 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 139 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7156 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 140 WHEREAS, cost.has been determined for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, -as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. I City Clerk Mayor . 0 • RESOLUTION NO. 7157 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 141 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subd. ' by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, -as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed- assessment in his office for - public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. City Clerk Mayor • 9 RESOLUTION NO. 7158 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 142 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, -and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. "7159 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 143 WHEREAS, cost.has been determined for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7160 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 144 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7161 i RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 145 WHEREAS, cost,has been determined for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within -the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he _ shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7162 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 146 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7163 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 147 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Graham St. from Robert's Road to Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7164 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll 148 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7165 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 149 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Atlanta Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7166 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 150 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Boston St. from Century Ave. to Atlanta Ave. in Paden`s FIkst Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED-BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk 0 RESOLUTION NO. 7167 • RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 151 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Burns Manor by the construction of: surfacing of driveway and parking area; and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $- , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $ 2. The City. Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall -file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public - inspection. 3. The Clerk shall,upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7168 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 125 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bluff Street from 200' to 1,200' North of Waller's Drive by the construction of: watermain, sanitary sewer, sewer lift station and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982. Mayor City Clerk 6 -Q' RESOLUTION NO. 7169 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 126 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, -the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 xxxx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. .Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7170 • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 127 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Baltimore Ave. from Atlanta Ave. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982, in the City Hall at 8 :00 axxx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7171 0 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 128 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of .improving: T.H. 15 from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden`s First Add. by the construction of: 12" watermain and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this _22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June , 1982 . • RESOLUTION NO. 7172 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 129 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's'Second Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 axxx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June 1982. Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7173 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 130 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 19 82 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Countiy Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 6" watermain and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8 :0p axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 19 82 . Mayor City Clerk • • RESOLUTION NO. 7174 is RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 131 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden`s First Add. by the construction of: 10" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 nxnx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . City Clerk I Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7175 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 132 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St.'to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. . 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of - June 1982 . City Clerk I Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7176 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 133 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspectign, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at S :Op axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment _ and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7177 0 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 134 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: I. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 arc (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7178 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 135 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St.'to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 18" storm sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July 1982, in the City Hall at 8 :0p ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll-not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of - June , 1982 . City Clerk Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7179 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 136 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 arc (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June , 1982. RESOLUTION NO. 7180 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 137 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's'Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1 A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July 1982 . in the City Hall at 8:00 axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June 1982 . City Clerk I Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7181 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 138 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of . July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8 :00 axmx (p.m.) to pass upon.such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement._ He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment-roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June , 1982 . RESOLUTION NO. 7182 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 139 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 19 82 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 axmx (P.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION N0. 7183 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 140 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 to . in the City Hall at 8 :00 ax= (p.m.) pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described -in -the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June 1982 . City Clerk N Mayor i RESOLUTION NO. 7184 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 141 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8 :00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk i Y RESOLUTION NO. 7185 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 142 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St, to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at 8 :Op axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June 1982 . RESOLUTION NO. 7186 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 143 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 . in the City Hall at 8 :00 axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982. City Clerk 9 Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 7187 1 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 144 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbatier's First and Second Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 , in the City Hall at 8:00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June , 1982 . RESOLUTION NO. 7188 • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 145 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 , in the City Hall at 8 :00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk s RESOLUTION NO. 7189 • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 146 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public Inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 in the City Hall at 8:00 sxmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7190 • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 147 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Graham St. from Robert's Road to Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 axmx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of Mayor City Clerk June 1982 . r � • RESOLUTION NO. 711_ • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 148 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 Sx= (P.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7192 • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 149 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 , the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Atlanta Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July . 1982, in the City Hall at 8:00 ax= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. Zlc)i • RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 150 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Boston St. from Century Ave. to Atlanta Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982, in the City Hall at 8 :00 xx= (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 7194 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Assessment Roll No. 151 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on June 22nd, , 1982 the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Burns Manor by the construction of: surfacing of driveway and parking area; AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of July , 1982 , in the City Hall at -8:00 axnx (p.m.) to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of June , 1982 . Mayor City Clerk PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOISON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES04, ON THURSDAY, TUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2939 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -01 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 125 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bluff Street from 200' to 1,200' North of Waller's Drive by the construction of: watermain, sanitary sewer, sewer lift station and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with*the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUT* SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES *, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2940 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -03 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 126 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCO SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2941 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -04 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 127 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Atlanta Ave. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUT(*SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES*, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2942 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -05 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 128 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: T.H. 15 from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 12" watermain and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Datedi June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCi SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNEA, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2943 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -06 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 129 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 8" watermain and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC•SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES10, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2944 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -07 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 130 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 6" watermain and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES01 ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2945 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -08 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 131 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 10" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such- notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of:the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Datedt June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC #SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESO, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2946 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -09 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 132 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden`s First Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESie, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2947 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -10 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 133 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCIWON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESS, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2948 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -11 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 134 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subdivision by the construction of: 8" sanitary sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Datedt June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES91 ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2949 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -15 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 135 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8 :00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: 18" storm sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of .the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Datedi June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCI&ON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES* ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2950 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -16 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 136 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this spgcial assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCWON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESde, ON 'THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2951 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -17 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 137 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: 15" storm sewer and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this spacial assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC 9SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES0 ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2952 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -19 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 138 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCI&;ON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESO ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2953 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -20 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 139 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30'days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC *SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES0, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2954 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -21 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 140 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Datedt June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESl, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2955 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -22 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 141 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: grading and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC4WON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES* ON THURSDAY, lTJNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2956 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -24 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Baltimore Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal-an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota--- - Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or -Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCWON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, .INNES ,, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2957 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -25 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 143 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Boston St. from Atlanta Ave. to Baltimore Ave. in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES., ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2958 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -26 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 144 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Sherwood St. between Schmidtbauer's First and Second Add. by the construction of: gravel basen and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within -ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUT' SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNES101 ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2959 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -27 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 145 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer's Second Add. by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes - Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCOSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, 14I'NESo, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2960 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -28 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 146 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Lindy Lane in Kimberly's Country Estates by the construction of: gravel base and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of-the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; - however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 ~ PUBi.,ISHED IN THE HUTC•SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, IMINNEA, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2961 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -32 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 147 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Graham St. from Robert's Road to Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTC.SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, 1-1I!'Nf -: *, ON THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2962 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -33 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. -14g Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Milwaukee Ave. in Town and Country Estates Subd. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however; no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 • PUBLISHED IT! '..BE HUTASON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNEA, ON `THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2963 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -37 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 149 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Atlanta Ave. from Boston St. to T.H. 15 in Paden's First Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing-such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of ..the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 P`TBLISHED IN THE HUTC *SON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MIPINES6, OPT THURSDAY, JUNE 24TH, 1982. PUBLICATION NO. 2964 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 -38 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 150 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that.the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Boston St. from Century Ave. to Atlanta Ave. in Paden`s First Add. by the construction of: bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner- may appeal an- assessment -to- District Court pursuant to -- Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dateds June 22nd, 1982 P11BTJGHED Its T11F YJtj'i C ovN LEADER, HUTCHINSON, t�lIC�NE;,�, t' 'j'HiJRSDAY, .TUNE 24TH, PUBLICATION NO. 2965 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PROJECT NO. 82 =47 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 151 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 22nd, 1982 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on Tuesday, July 13th, 1982, at City Hall to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Burns Manor by the construction of: surfacing of driveway and parking area; The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed indivicual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any indivicual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. Uner Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $ Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated; June 22nd, 1982 • .L 1. CALL TO ORDER MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1982 The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to order by Vice - Chairman Larry Romo at 7:31 P.M. with the following members present: Ted Beatty, Roland Ebent, Jim Johnson, Larry Romo, Clint Tracy and Elsa Young. Absent: Don Erickson. Also attending were City Administrator Gary Plotz, City Attorney Jim Schaefer and Director of Engineering Marlow Priebe. 2. MINUTES . The minutes of the regular meeting dated April 20, 1982 were unanimously approved on motion by Jim Johnson and seconded by Ted Beatty. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "LIPKE ADDITION" The hearing was opened at 7:32 P.M. with the reading of publication 12926 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1982. Vice - Chairman Larry Romo then asked City Engineer Marlow Priebe for comments. Mr. Priebe stated a conditional use permit had been issued for a portion of the plat allowing C -2 zoning, namely Lot 2, Block 2. The remainder is zoned R -2. Mr. Pat Flynn, attorney for Likpe, referred to a letter requesting compensation for the dedication of Sunset Street either by a re- duction in park and playgrounds contribution or a reduction in future assessments. Lengthy discussion followed and section 5.201 of subdivision ordinance #466 was referred to and it was decided this section -- justified Mr. Priebe's request for the extension of Sunset Street. Mr. Ebent questioned Mr., Flynn as to whether or not Mr. Lipke hadn't noticed the curb cuts off of South Grade Road indicating Sunset Street would be someday extended. Mr. Flynn remarked he couldn't answer for Mr. Lipke. Mr. Romo then referred to section 5.213 of sub. div. Ord. #466 where it indicates one exit shall not be-permitted. The hearing was closed at 7:55 P.M. on motion by Roland Ebent. Seconded by Clint Tracy, the motion unanimously carried. A�1 J-i Hutchinson Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat for Lipke Addition based on the fact it meets all the requirements of subdivision # 466 and provided the dev- eloper meets the park contribution recommended by the City Eng- ineer. Mr. Roland Ebent then amended the motion to include that Mr. Lipke meet all the items listed in the subdivision agree- ment preliminary draft. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion car- ried unanimously. 4. OLD BUSINESS 5. (a) DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION There was brief discussion on this item since it was felt it was related to item 5(b). Mr. Priebe, City Engineer, stated some area in the city should be designated for mobile homes either by zoning or designating standards for dwellings in districts. NEW BUSINESS (a) REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR "WRIGHT ESTATES" Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission a hard surfaced roadway would be best. Motion was made by Roland Ebent to recommend to the City Council to forward a recommendation to the county planning commission approval of the plat with the suggestion of hard surfaced road. Seconded by Ted Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. (b) REVIEW OF NEW STATE LAW ON MANUFACTURED HOUSING - UPDATE BY MR. JIM SCHAEFER, CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Jim Schaefer, City Attorney, explained that as of August 1, 1982 a new law will be in effect stating "No regulations or single family zoning ordinance may prohibit.... manufactured homes built in conformance with section 327.31, Subd. 6, or any other single family dwellings that comply with all other zoning ordinances promulgated pursuant to this section." He went on to say this can be dealt with in various ways. Certain districts could be set aside for mobile /manufactured housing and or a mixed district could be formed for both manufactured homes and site built homes. Also the City could design certain standards for dwellings in residential districts such as minimum width, mini - mun square footage, etc. IV • • Hutchinson Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 Discussion followed and it was determined that the City staff should work together to construct an amendment to the zoning ordinance and set a public hearing for June's regular meeting. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion the City staff set a public hearing for June 15, 1982 and construct an amendment to the zoning ordinance that provides districts that contain structures that meet the Uniform Building Code, create districts that per- mit manufactured homes as defined by M.S. 327.31- 327.35 (not required by law to meet the Uniform Building Code) as well as site built homes which meet the Uniform Building Code, i.e. mixed district, and a mobile home park district- Seconded by Roland Ebent, the motion carried unanimously. (c) REVIEW OF COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNED FOR S & L BUILDING City Administrator, Gary Plotz, took the floor explaining to the Commission that they may review any planned major dev- elopment in the downtown area, in light of the Comprehensive Plan. He went on to say Mr. McClure plans to renovate the S & L building. He then showed floor plans showing five retail businesses-for-the first floor,.a restaurant for the basement and the top floor being used for office space: Mr. Plotz briefly went over the financial aspect of the project. However, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission they were not concerned with that portion of the project but rather the concept. Mr: Jim Johnson then made a motion to recommend to the City Council that we as a Planning Commission accept the concept of the proposal and that it does fit the Comprehensive Plan. Seconded by Clint Tracy, the motion unanimously carried. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourned at 8:48 P.M.'on motion by Ted Beatty and seconded by Clint Tracy. Motion carried unanimously. 0 CITY OF HUTWINSON MINUTES SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD APRIL 28, 1982 Ll� The meeting of the Senior Advisory Board was called to order by Chairman Carol Haukos at 2:00 p.m. on April 28, 1982. Members present: Carol Haukos Emma Lake Hazel Sitz Lenard Schuft Roy Clabo Jean Peterson John Longley Also present: Barb Haugen, Senior Center Coordinator The minutes of the meeting of March 24 were approved. Staff reports were made: Barb Haugen reviewed the May news flyer which lists activities for the month. Joan Phillips reported on the Nutrition program. Hazel Sitz reported on Hutchmobile operation and on the status of a sign for the senior center on the exterior of the building. Carol Haukos reviewed the status of the distribution of the-monthly news flyer, which is presently distributed to about 500 readers as a handout. Roy Clabo volunteered to further investigate a bulk mailing permit, since this method of providing information was originally approved by the Board. The date of the next meeting will be determined later. Meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m. Hazel Sitz, Secretary 1"e-. WATER & SEWER FUND WATER & CITY OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES $ 74,681.53 $ 917 300.00 FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MAY, 1982 REVENUE REPORT CURRENT ADOPTED YEAR TO MONTH BUDGET DATE AMOUNT $0,000,000.00 $0,000,000.00 $7,000,000.00 Description TAXES 000 855,303.00 000 LICENSES 327.00 11,232.00 13,299.34 PERMITS AND FEES 1,888.65 36,000.00 9,519.97 FINANCING FEES 000 2,000.00 1,000.00 INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE (629.78) 828,673.00 49,698.71 CEMETERY PERPETUAL CARE FUND 200.00 000 650.00 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 23,344.05 29S,059.00 88,808.18 FINES AND FORFEITS 2,260.75 26,000.00 9,766.55 SALE OF EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES 000 60,000.00 000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 16,654.63 164,640.00 68,301.39 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,194.58 372,500.00 83,744.58 REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES 120.40 300.00 " 651.17 $ 45,360.28 $ 2,651,707,00 $ 325,439.89 WATER & SEWER FUND WATER & SEWER UTILITIES $ 74,681.53 $ 917 300.00 REMAINING BALANCE $0,000,000.00 855,303.00 ( 2,067.34) 26,480.03 1,000.00 778,974.29 ( 650.00) 206,250.82 16,233.45 60,000.00 96,338.61 288,755.42 (351.17) $ 384,430.40 $ 532,869.60 PERCENTAGE USED 118.4% 26.4% 50.0% 6.0% 30.1% 37.60 41.5% 22.5% 217.10 12.3% 41.9% t1, EXPENSE REPORT CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MAY, 1982 CURRENT ADOPTED YEAR TO MONTH BUDGET DATE AMOUNT 0,000,000.00 0,000,000.00 0,000.000.00 REMAINGING PERCENTAGE BALANCE USED 0,000,000.00 % DECRIPTION GENERAL FUND MAYOR $ COUNCIL 44014.74 32,157.00 13,755.64 18,401.36 42.8% CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK 113271.75 98,350.00 45,757.23 52,592.77 46.5% ELECTIONS 000 8,678.00 50.20 8,627.80 .6% FINANCE 12,832.07 140,545.00 68,544.42 72,000.58 48.8% MOTOR VEHICLE 6,806.04 50,737.00 24,343.01 26,393.99 48.0% ASSESSING 000 16,874.00 000 16,874.00 -- LEGAL 1,967.77 24,233.00 12,097.61 12,135.39 49.9% PLANNING 90.00' 1,425.00 679.06 745.94 47.7% CITY HALL 2,996.71 38,383.00 183005.00 20,378.00 46.9% OLD ARMORY 1,499.23 20,913,00 11,493.91 9,41909 55.0% POLICE DEPARTMENT 57,800.09 524,784.00 235,893.35 288,890.65 45.0% • FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,736.64 1293255..00 15,100.31 114,154.69 11.7% COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 2,894.68 27,469.00 11,832.62 15,636.38 43.1% PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 43228.85 40,074.00 17,485.88 22,588.12 43.6% CIVIL DEFENSE 000 450..00 104.28 345.72 23.2% SAFETY COUNCIL 000 150.00 000 150.00 -- FIRE MARSHALL 3,443.13 33,112.00 14,241.19 18,870.81 43.0% ENGINEERING 143253.77 137,815.00 59,079.27 78.735.73 42.9% 0 EXPENSE REPORT CONTINUED STREETS 4 ALLEYS STREET MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT CONSERVATION OF HEALTH LIBRARY SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER PARK /RECREATION ADMINISTRATION RECREATION CIVIC ARENA PARK DEPARTMENT CEMETERY DOW14TOWN DEVELOPMENT LAWCON DEBT SERVICE AIRPORT TRANSIT UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPENSE 11RA CURRENT MONTH 00000,000.00 23,350.78 5,034,79 000 248.54 1,269.01 6,245.21 5,416.54 2,752.37 24,824.46 3,937.31 000 7,654.16 4,160.00 2,560.32 4,509.49 1,438.82 5,764.95 $ 223,275.52 ADOPTED BUDGET 0,000,000.00 288,652.00 64,635.00 000 52,537.00 10,268.00 55,668.00 57,852.00 89,093.00 254,646..00 33,726..00 000 110,430.00 55,668.00 47,775.00 65,659.00 143,387.00 000 $2,655,400.00 YEAR TO DATE AMOUNT 0,000,000.00 112,034.35 25,831.87 000 26,249.42 5,790.52 25,045.85 19,300.11 47,405.02 95,704.98 12,185.95 80.25 5,955.05 25,613.44 23,196.22 25,112.32 2,310.33 23,286.69 REMAINING BALANCE $ , 00 0, 00.00 176,617.65 38,803.13 000 26,287.58 4,477.48 30,622.15 38,551.89 41.687.98 158,941.02 21,540.05 `( 80.52) 104,474.95 30,054.56 24,578.78 40,546.68 141,076.78 (23,286.69) $1,023,565.51 $ 1,631,834.49 PERCENTAGE USED 38.80 40.0% 50.0% 56.4% 45.0% 33.4% 53.2% 37.6% 36.1% 5.4% 46.0% 48.6% 38.2% 1.6% 38.6% lAllf"NSE REPORT CONTINUED I)I:SCRIPTION & SEWER FUND EATER & SEWER ADMINISTRATION WATER PLANT OPERATIONS SLIVER PLANT OPERATIONS 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR MAY 1982 CURRENT ADOPTED MONTH BUDGET 0,000,000.00 0,000,000.00 35,131.71 822,026.00 6,519.84 1,305,825.00 11,600.42 135,750.00 $ 53,251.97 $2,263,601.00 YEAR TO REMAINING DATE AMOUNT BALANCE 0,000,000.00 0,000,000.00 PERCENTAGE USED 243,614.32 578,411.68- 29.50 33,987.21 1,271,837.79 2.6% 59,521.12 76,228.88 43.8% $ 337,122.65 $1,926,478.35 14.9% t • POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Chief Dean M. O'Borsky SUBJECT: Communication Equipment DATE June 14, 1982 As per your request I researched the cost of portable radios. I priced portable radios available through Motorola and General Electric. The radio priced was a 5 watt, 4 channel capability portable. The Motorola radio, Model #HT -440 would be equipped as follows: carrying case, fast rate charger and battery, 2 frequencies installed and provisions for a remote microphone. The HT -440 price was quoted as being $1200.00 per unit. The G.E. representative quoted two radios. The radios, models #MPX and #PE are equipped basically the same as the Motorola HT -440. Both have the fast rate charge and remote microphone capabilities. The MPX price was quoted at 2065.00 per unit and the PE at $1800.00 per unit. The quality of all of the above portable radios is comparable. With this information 1 would recommend the purchase of two Motoroal HT -440 radios and chargers. The two outmoded portables that we are replacing have a total value of $200.00. 1 further suggest that we transfer these portables to other city use and that the Council approve the purchase of a new scanner for our console. The scanner can be purchased for $145.00. (See attached) This is the best price on this kind of scanner available and will replace the scanner we currently have which has become inoperable. DMO:nb ►: 17 r6L' �ICY. lodel Telescopic Antenna igh impact ESc Built -in cabinet top mounted els— Select your favorite charm s. speaker —Seeks all the action on High, Lo d UHF bands. he best price/ performance on in any scanner.. On ft, Step 89-95 manu scan Control control switch rystals Extra) Model R -804 This is the full feature udget priced scanner. Rec ' es VHF High, Low and UH public service bands o fight, crystal- _ controlled cha els. - r 29 5 ' 1 � (Cryst s Extra) - -- - -J • 1 1 M del R -106 ystal -controlled scanning 149 95 at home or on the go. ** Ten channels cover all the action on the three basic (Crystals Extra) public service bands, extended UHF and two separate amateur bands. - 1 Model E -106 Crystal - controlled 10 channel scanner with ' –y priority scan. Channel one automatically �ii✓/ �� i t ��'" takes priority over the other channels. Receives three 1 wf, basic public - service bands plus too / extended UHF and amateur bands. �, ti GGGGG�G 169.95 (Crystals Extra) - 7" (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCH/NSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: - June 16, 1982 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROMc Planning Commission 3USJECTe Conditional Use Permit - submitted by Mr. Jack Kjos_ -• - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pursuant to Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On May 28, 1982 an application for a conditional use permit was submitted by Mr. Jack Kjos to allow the addition of a 17' x 14' porch to the west side of his house. This conforms with the zoning, the existing garage/ use of land is non - conforming. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 15,'1982 at which time no one was present objecting to the request. It was pointed out that Mr. Kjos will be in compliance with all the required setbacks. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. 3. Since the existing garage /use of land is non - conforming, a conditional use permit is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be granted. Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission q b RE S07 i10; NO. ;196 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07, C.5 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE ADDITION OF PORCH TO HOUSE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. Mr. Jack Rjos of Hutchinson has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the addition of a 17' x 14' porch to the west side of the house to conform with the existing garage /use of-land, with a common description of 571 Juul Road, and a legal description of: Lot 14, Block 2, Juuls Oak Park, City of Hutchinson 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding prop- erty values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. rnurrncTnu The application-for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. W ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk James G. DeMeyer Mayor / !612) 7 -;� 15 -1 C11-7 0.-- I ,° o f cP:11'." O f 61 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 16, 1982 TO; Hutchinson City Council. - --------------------------------- FROMt Planning Commission SUBJECTt Conditional Use Permit submitted by Mr. Hoversten /Mr. Cornell Pursuant to Section 6.07,-.C.S of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On May 28, 1982 an application for a, conditional use permit was submitted by Mr. Hoversten and Mr. Cornell to allow the construction of a 50' x 100' metal type building to be used for office /warehouse which would be located in a IC -1 zone. A public hearing was held on June 15, 1982 at which time no one was present objecting to the request. Staff requested the building be moved to allow for a road right of way and also requested a warranty deed for that portion of Third Avenue connecting to Hwy. # 7. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as pub- lished in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. 3. Since the property is zoned IC -1, a conditional use permit is necessary. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the Conditional Use Permit requested be granted contingent upon the stipulations listed in the attached letter be met. Respectfully-submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission ;. (672) 537 5757 y�rcH CITY OF % U r Ch 1[1 SON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST_ HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: _ June_31 1982 To: _ _ _Planning Commission Members FROM: __ —Cit,Y Planninq Department _______ ___ _ ___ ___ SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Hoversten /Cornell Recommend approval with the following stipulations: City receives an easement for Third Avenue or warranty deed (preferably warranty deed) thirty (30) feet on the South, sixty (60) feet wide centered on present used surface for that portion of Third Avenue connecting to Hwy. # 7. Building should be located at least five.(5) feet from the proposed South road right of way and existing highway -right of way..(35' from existing south property line) Parking be provided according to the zoning ordinance based on square footage of the building use.- FOR YOUR INFORMATION: Deferred assessments on Third Avenue include sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer improvements. Future assessments include curb, gutter and permanent surfacing. - �e - (�Zv-4 Wit* Mr. ar o z, C Adm. 1 Mr. Homer Pittman, Bldg. Official Mr. Marlow Priebe, City Eng. RESOLUTION NO. 7197 • RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07, C.5 OF ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 464 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF METAL TYPE BUILDING FOR OFFICE /WAREHOUSE USE LOCATED IN IC -1 ZONE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. Mr. Duane E. Hoversten-Qf Buffalo Lake, Minnesota and Mr. Gerald P. Cor- nell of Hutchinson, Minnesota have made application to the City Council for a Con- ditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the construction of a 50' x 100' metal type building to be used for an office /ware- house, located in a IC -1 zone, with property located at Third Avenue Northwest and Highway 7. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding prop - -y values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. romrTA NTON The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is �i�,nted, based upon the findings set forth above, contingent upon the following stipulations being met: 1. City receives an easement for Third Avenue Northwest or warranty deed (preferably warranty deed) thirty (30) feet on the south, sixty (60) feet wide centered on present used surface for that portion of Third Avenue Northwest con- necting to Hwy. V. 2. Building should be located at least five (5) feet from the proposed south road right -of -way and existing highway right -of -way. (35' from existing south prop- erty line.) 3. Parking be provided according to the zoning ordinance based on square footage of the building use. q-61 RESOLUTION NO. 7197 PAGE 2 Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of June, 1982. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk James G. DeMeyer Mayor 0 0 ('612) 56, -6151 %HUTCH% GLYl 011' erul, i'aiAI QN 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DOTE: _ _ _ _ June 16, 1982 _ T _ _ TO; _ _ Hutchinson City Council _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ . FRDMt Planning Commission_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SLIa=: Amendment to Zoning ordinance No. 464 _submitted by City Staff , _ �_Planning COmmlSSlon— Pursuant to Section 6.06 C.1, of Zoning.Ordinance'No. -464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its - finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request. HISTORY City Staff set a public.bearing for June 15, 1982 for the consideration of amending- Section_8:— Zoning Districts and Zoning Map; Section 9: Tabulation - Dimensional Requirements -for Zoning Districts and deleting the entire section 7.14 Mobile Home Park Requirements. The addition of districts R -4 and R -5 allowing for mobile homes and mobile home parks had previously been discussed and city staff had been instructed to establish districts giving specific regulations for such districts. Attached are the-changes approved by the Planning Commission. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the zoning ordinance have been complied with. 2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. 3. The proposal was deemed to bey appropriate and in the best interest of the community. - RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation-of the Planning Commission that the attached amendments to the Zoning Ordinance be approved and section 7.14 Mobile Home Park Requirements be 'deleted. - Respectfully submitted, Mr. Don Erickson, Chr. Hutchinson- Planning Commission ff 0 SF,Ci . NG D Zti P C \ING 'LAP All structures permitted in the R -1, R -2, R -3, IC -1 and PUD Districts shall be constructed in Uniform Building Code as adopted by the State City of Hutchinson. R -4 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT PURPOSE 1] C -1, C -2, C -s, C -4, I -1, accordance with the of Minnesota and the The R -4 RESIDENCE DISTRICT is intended to provide areas offering a broad dev- elopment range in housing units, yet retain the environment and character of less intensive residence areas through carefully established bulk and lot area requirement. The following uses are permitted, as regulated, herein, without special application requirements or conditions attached: Single family detached manufactured homes as defined by M.S. 327.31- 327.35 (not required by law to meet the Uniform Building Code) The following uses are permitted, as regulated, herein, without special application requirements or conditions attached provided they are con- structed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the State of Minnesota and the City of Hutchinson. Single family detached dwellings Two family attached dwellings, duplexes, double bungalows Public or non - profit quasi - public libraries, museums, and art exhibition centers All uses as principle permitted uses in the R -1 district CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USES The following uses are permitted only subject to the issuance of a con- ditional use permit as stipulated in section 6.07 provided they are constructed is accordance with the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the State of Minnesota and the City of Hutchinson. Licensed day care centers; licensed nursing homes Private clubs, Lodges and Fraternal organizations Public or quasi- public accredited educational institutions Mortuaries or funeral homes; cemeteries or memorial gardens Transportable or experimental single family detached housing All uses as conditional uses in R41 district. Any structure, including accessory structures, for which a moving permit is requested except any building not exceeding eight (8) feet in width or twelve (12) feet in length and not being over ten (10) feet in height which are exempt from moving permits, but, require a building permit. 0 • NIL ACCESSORY USES The following uses are permitted only when auxiliary to a principal use permitted above, they may not exist as principal uses in their own stead provided they are constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code as adopted by the Stale of Minnesota and the City of Hutchinson; Accessory uses as listed in the R -1 Residence District Enclosed equipment and vehicle storage areas for non - residential uses (subject to acceptable materials and design) Any accessory use, building or structure customarily incidental to a use permitted above, and located on the same lot therewith. Parking and loading facilities as regulated in Section 10.02 Signs as regulated in Section 10.05. DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS Building height, lot area, bulk and yard setback requirements shall be those set forth in Section 9, TABULATION OF DIMENSIONAL AND SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING DISTRICTS. SPECIAL DISTRICT PROVISIONS Prohibiting storage and dispensing of flammable and combustible liquids above and below ground from fixed equipment into fuel tanks and motor vehicles. Prohibiting home occupations, as defined in section 4. Prohibiting storage of all combustibles as defined /referred to in the Uniform Fire Code except in uncovered areas or accessory buildings. All accessory buildings shall be a minimum of 10 feet from the principal building. All lots or parcels of property to be occupied by a principal building shall have the required frontage on a public street. All manufactured homes as defined by M.S. 327.31 - 327.35 shall be anchored in accordance with the MINNESOTA CODE OF AGENCY RULES - BUILDING CODE DIVISION - SECTION 2 MCAR - 1.904.50 "Stabilizing System for Mobile Homes ". 4 • AMENDMENT TO SECTION 9: TABULATION - DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONING DISTRICTS: Dimensional Regulations for R -4 1. Building Height a. Allowable Stories b. Max. height in ft. c. Max. height acc. structures 2. Lot Area Requirements a. Min. total lot area 3.0 40' 15' SF 6,000 sq. ft. 2F 10,000 sq. ft. MF 15,000 sq. ft. b. Min. lot area /D.U. 5,000 sq. ft. c. Lot width (bldg line) 60' d. Lot depth (minimum) 100' e % of lot coverage 40% • (all structures) 3. Yard Setback: min, required a. Front: bldg line to street line - 25' b. Side: bldg line to street line Each side 8' plus 0.1 foot for each additional 1.0 foot of building length over 50' adjacent to side lot line c. Rear: bldg line to lot line or alley centerline See Note d. Corner: bldg. line to street line e. Setback from "R" District Boundary 25' Front yard setback required for both yd. abutting streets N/A Note: Accessory buildings may be set back a minimum of 6' from side or rear lot line. • R -S MOBILE HOME PARK No mobile home park shall be established except as a conditional use. The conditional use permit for such shall not be issued except after public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.08. No public hearing shall be held until the following information is submitted; a) Location and size of the mobile home park; b) Location and size of each trailer site, dead storage area, recreation area, roadways, parking sites, and all setback dimensions; c) Detailed landscaping plans and specifications; d) Plans for sanitary sewer disposal, surface drainage, water systems, electrical services and fuel systems; e) Such other information as is necessary to insure conformance with the requirements of this ordinance. Overall Minimum Park Regulations: Each mobile home park shall be of sufficient size to contain at least twelve (12) fully developed coach sites and required accessory areas. Each mobile home park shall have access to a public street which is deemed adequate to service the anticipated traffic generated by the park. Each mobile home park shall provide public water and sewer facilities in accordance with standards determined by the City. Each mobile home park shall provide a common central T.V. antenna. All fuel systems shall be maintained from a common central source metered to each individual coach site. At least ten percent (10 %) of the land area within each mobile park shall be designed for development for recreational purposes. Such spaces shall be developed and maintained by the owner of the mobile park. Each mobile home park shall have one or more central community buildings. No mobile home site, off - street parking space, building or street shall be located within thirty (30) feet of the boundary of any mobile home park. This boundary area shall be landscaped and screening may be re- quired by the City. , Identification signs for the park shall be limited to one sign not exceed- ing six (6) square feet for each outside street frontage. Such signs may be illuminated but not flashing. The maximum height of such signs shall be twenty (20) feet. Each mobile home park shall have an office which is distinctly marked and illuminated. Provisions shall be made for an adult caretaker to be on duty at the park at all times. The mobile home park office shall main- tain a registry showing the names and addresses of each resident and the make, type and license of each mobile home and automobile belonging to occupants of the coach sites. Provisions shall- be_made_in_ plans for every mobile home park to provide for a street fronting on each mobile home site. Such streets may be either public or private as agreed upon between the mobile home park developer and the City. Streets shall have a minimum width to be of continuing value as City streets if the area ceases to serve as a mobile home park. In no case shall the City be under obligation to construct additional public streets within mobile home parks except as such streets will be of value to the City in addition to the service they provide to mobile home park areas. All streets shall be of hard surface including complete curb and gutter according to standards specified by the City Eng- ineer. ` Individual Mobile Home Site Requirements: Individual mobile home sites within each mobile home park shall comply with the following requirements: a) Each site shall have a minimum of five thousand (5,000) square feet. b) The minimum width of each site shall be fifty (50) feet'; the minimum depth shall be one hundred (100) feet. Each site shall also have the following: a) Frontage on an approved public or private street b) Landscaping shall provide for at least one tree on each coach site. c) No mobile home shall be set closer than five (5) feet from the side lot line, nor closer than twenty (20) feet from the front line. d) There shall be an open space of at least twenty (20) feet between the sides of adjoining coaches and at least thirty (30) feet between the ends of coaches when parked on the individual sites. e) There shall be at least two parking spaces with an all - weather, hard surface on each coach site: Such space shall not be closer than five (5) feet from either a coach or a lot line. Minimum parking space dimensions shall be eight and one -half feet (830 by twenty (20) feet. f) The occupied area of a coach site shall not exceed sixty (60 %) per cent of the total area of the site. This restriction shall apply to coverage by the mobile home, parking spares and any connecting or attached structures. g) Each site shall have a front yard of not less than twenty (20) feet in depth across the entire frontage. This yard shall be landscaped except for driveway and parking needs which shall not exceed one- half (h) the width of the site. h) No more than ten per cent (10 %) of the sites shall be established for transient occupancy. The remainder of the sites shall be leased to owner coaches for a period of not less than thirty (30) days occupancy. i) Each site shall be identified by number. Building Permit Requirements: Initial permits for construction of mobile home parks will not be issued for the development of less than twelve (12) coach sites. No permit will be issued until the developer provides site and construction plans indicating the following: a) Location and size of the mobile home park. b) Location and size of each trailer site, dead storage area, recreation area, roadways, parking sites, and all setback dimensions. c) Detailed landscaping plans and specifications. d) Plans for sanitary sewer disposal, surface drainage, water systems, electrical services and fuel systems. e) Location and specifications for all streets abutting the mobile home park and proposed driveways from such streets into the park. _ f) All road construction plans and specifications. g) Complete construction plans for all proposed structures. h) Such other information as is necessary to insure conformance with the requirements of this ordinance. - The developer shall provide five copies of the above required plans and shall submit a detailed description of construction plans indicating the time involved, cost estimates, stage developments, if any, and a detailed description of maintenance procedures and ground supervision and methods proposed for disposal of garbage and refuse. The City may require performance bonds in amounts adequate to insure that development proposed in the plan submitted is actually completed. All developers of mobile home parks shall provide evidence that the plans, therefore, have been approved by the State of Minnesota Department of Health and that the developer will comply with all recommendations, suggestions and regulations, specified by thatf department- relative to mobile home park regulations. Mobile home parks shall meet the requirements of Section 8.11 Flood Plain Districts of this Zoning Ordinance. .i / ri:./ �6i � CST CP SF s ♦ r L � "t.�.� �� p 37 SH" GTCN AVENUE b, VEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 22, 1982 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Water Billing Department SUBJECT; Delinquent Water Accounts. - 04- 0240 -0 -00 11- 1100 -2-00 Lynette Miller Daniel Bergstrom 566 Monroe St. S. 855 Oak St. N. $36.61 $32.83 Promised to pay 6 -30 -82 11- 1160 -0 -00 04- 0290 -0 -00. Roy Chaffee Roger Voss 715 Main St. N. 510 Monroe St. S. $51.52 $51.52 Promised to Pay 06 -25 -82 12- 0170 -0 -00 Jerry Carrigan 04- 0370 -2 -00 15 Fifth Ave. N.E. Wilton Soderberg $87.03 206 Monroe St. S. $45.92 12- 0300 -4 -00 Bill Nice 04- 0375 -4 -00 32 McLeod Ave. Dennis McCutchen $63.95 146 Monroe St. St. $68.34 12- 0415 -0 -00 Thomas Brown 04- 0600" -1 =00 614 Elm St. 336 Erie St. S. $88.90 $45.92 Promised to pay 06 -25 -82 04- 0625 -2 -00 12- 1000 -2 -00 Richard Sturges Rodney Markgraf 425 Third Ave. S.E. 565 Clark St. $57.13 $81.43 Promised to pay 06 -30 -82 0 DELINQUENT ?ACCOUNTS CONTINUED 12- 1710 -1 -00 Paul Reid 175 Arch St. $72.08 15- 0097 -0 -00 Alvin Baune 478 Shady Ridge Road $107:59 Promised to pay 6 -25 -82 15- 0142 -0 -00 Debbie Holmquist 400 Shady Ridge Road $49.14 Promised to pay 06 -25 -82 15- 0188 -0 -00 Gary Aanderude 420 Connecticut St. $60.87 Promised to Pay 07 -01 -82 • 16- 0560 -1 -00 Miles Willhite 136 Eleventh Ave. N.E. $88.90 $48.90 Pd 6 -01 -82 $40.00 Promised to pay 06 -30 -82 40- 0086 -0 -00 Modern Building Systems 1115 Highway 7 West $44.70 Recommend service be discontinued at 12:00 Noon, Monday, June 28, 1982 unless otherwise noted. a u' -5151 (612) 587 frUrcy` CITY OF HUTCHINSON ' 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Bruce Ericson, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: June 18, 1982 SUBJECT: Advertising for bids to light fields at Roberts Park We have received our signed project agreement from the Minnesota Department of Energy, Planning and Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section for McDonald's Park, Phase II. The city is not budgeted for any funds for this project this year, however, we will be receiving the State funds shortly, which amounts to $40,125. It has been our plan that we use this money during 1982 to light the southeast and southwest fields in Roberts Park, and complete the project with budgeted money from 1983 and 1984. Therefore, I am re- questing that we advertise for bids to light the remaining fields at Roberts Park. Attachment G � pl June 10, 1982 Mr. Bruce Erickson Parks & Recreation Director 36 -1st Avenue, SE Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: NR 643, McDonald Park City of Hutchinson, McLeod County Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is your copy of the executed State Natural Resources Fund Project Agreement for the above designated project. Sincerely, eff Hanson, Grants Supervisor Parks and Recreation Grants Section /pas Enclosure Planning Division 100 Capitol Square, 550 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55101 612 - 296 -3985 V STATE OF fAIN'NESOTA STATE PLANNING AGENCY OFFICE OF LOCAL AND ORBA N .".FFAIRS STATE NATURAL RESOURCES FUND PROJECT AGREEMENT City of Hutchinson Local Unit of Government riCDONALD PARK Project Title 3123/82 through 12/31/84 Period Covered by this Agreement NR- 643 Project Number McLeod County PROJECT SCOPE: The City of Hutchinson ,rill develop McDonald Park by adding two softball field lighting, picnic shelter /restroom, boat landing, landscaping, seeding, site improvement. Any reference to the Office of Local &Urban Affairs, State Planning Agency contained in the agreement, or in any attachment incorporated thereto, shall hereinafter be considered a reference to the Office of Local Goverrunent, Department of Energy, Planning and DevelcipTien :. Entire Project Stage Covered by this Agreement Total Cost S 91,500.00 Fund Support 44 %_ Fund Amount' $ 40,125.00 The following attachments are hereby incorporated into this agreement: 1. Grant Application (OR -1) 2. 3. *Fund Amount: This is the maximum amc,-^t of state funds that shall be provided on the project. The State of Minnesota, by its dele --;-;'ed official, the State Planning Agency, Office of Local and Urban Affairs, (hereinafter referred to as "State ") a:-•S _ity of Hutchinson (hereinafter referred to as 'local un;-'•) mutually agree to perform this agreement in accordance with Minn. Laws Chap. 810 (1965); Minn. Laws, Cha:=- 867 (1967); Minn. Laws, Chap. 1139 (1969); Minn. Laws, Chap. 3 (Extra Session 1971); Minn. Laws, Chap. 72': (1973) and subsequent laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines of the State Planning Agency. The following terms as used herein sr : `•ave the following definitions: 1. "Director" means Director of t:-r-- Dffice of Local and Urban Affairs, or any representative lawfully delegated the authority to act for said Direr - ,D'- 2. "Funds' means those moneys rr =- available by the State under the State Natural Resources Fund. 3. "Guidelines" means the Natural =f �-jrces Fund Grants-in -Aid Guidelines. 4. "Local Unit" means the politirz s.:bdivision of the State of Minnesota that is the applicant- recipient of the grant pursuant to this agreemen-. 5.- "Project" means the planned ur.r_- - - <ing for outdoor recreation that is the subject of this agreement. 6. "State" means the State of M -'r = ='•a, the Office of Local and Urban Affairs of the State Planning Agency, which administers the State Na---- =:sources Fund program for the State of Minnesota. Page 1 of 6 Paces 9-� 0 7�(612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Bruce Ericson, Parks & Recreation Director DATE: June 18, 1982 SUBJECT: High School Tennis Court Resurfacing The School District 11423 opened bids at 1:30 p.m. June 15th for tennis court resurfacing at the High School. This is a joint project which is being split 50/50 by the school district and the city. The low bid for the resurfacing came from Tennis West of Min- netonka for the sum of $8,850. The Director of Business Affairs for the School District 11423 and myself are recommending that the low bid be accepted and would be completed as scheduled. The city's responsiblity will be $4,425, which falls within the budgeted amount, since we budgeted $7,500 for 1982. This same recommendation is before the School Board for consider- ation this evening, June 22nd. kls Attachment N BID FORM TO: Director of Business Affairs Independent School District No. 423 30 Glen Street North Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Gentlemen: The undersigned, having familiarized himself with local conditions affecting costs and with contract documents including General Provisions, Bid Form, and Detailed Specifications on file in the Director of Business Affairs' office, hereby proposes to furnish items as listed -in the bid, in accordance with the specifications on file. BID TITLE : 1 1 O gawts CvQra- ,RE' P—F4 Ai\1> DUE : dui I�Z �'Pm • Fwual C3Rtf Firm's Name pv�TZ�ruS�s � � WEST C."C1� • __ �i33�827Z Signature Phone Number 11.5% Bid Security Provided es No *NW ��b . Street 41 (4 b -N 8Z Date III. (yes) My company complies with applicable regulation of the State of Minnesota Department.of (no) Human Rights IV.I have received addendums as checked below: Addendum I Add enduni II Addendum III �?n�S • $ `�,�SC�. 00 s`��SZ'• °o 0 u C ^t!'SCiii June 14, 1982 LSD" ^`es ' The Hon. James E. DeMeyer, Mayor City of Hutchinson Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor DeMeyer: We would advise you and the members of the City Council of Hutchinson that the term of Commissioner Clinton Tracy expires August 31, 1982. Mr. Tracy is not eligible for reappointment as he has served the maximum terms as prescribed by the City Charter. The Commission would respectfully request that Mr. Tracy's replacement to the Commission be appointed at your earliest convenience. This would give the new member an opportunity to sit in on several monthly meetings to become acquainted with the workings of the Commission and thus be in a better position to contribute to major policy making decisions when he takes office September 1, 1982. The Commission has carefully considered a number of people as a capable replacement. We wish to place the name of Dr. Thomas Lyke for your consideration for appointment to the Commission. We feel Dr. Lyke has excellent credibility in the community, has shown active interest in the position, and would give a youthful perspective that would blend in well with the present Commission. We have asked Dr. Lyke to prepare a short statement of himself which is attached. We would ask that this be given consideration at the Council Meeting on June 22, 1982. Sincerely, n;n c HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION Vice Pre "O`r-' Clinton Tracy, Secretary C:..:on "racy cc: Aldermen Beatty, Carls, Gruenhagen, Mlinar cc: Commissioners Daggett, Filk, Tracy and Dr. Lyke /O 6 7 A 37 'vA/ASH/NG TON A', VEI,,;v'_- S! HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 WHEREAS, Master Sam Aning, a citizen of Ghana, has been a welcome visitor of Hutchinson for the school year 1981-82, and WHEREAS, Sam Aning has so comported himself to endear him to all the citizens of Hutchinson, and WHEREAS, it is our hope that Sam Aning will ever keep fond memories of his stay here, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, Sam Aning be, and hereby is, made an honorary citizen of the City of Hutch- inson and is designated as ambassador extraordinary for the City wherever he may travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT, said Sam Aning be assured that he shall have and receive all the rights, benefits and responsibilities which shall devolve to said citizenship. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT, the name of Sam Aning shall be inscribed in the records and minutes of this City as a memorial that he is made a citizen, for the edification of posterity. Given under my hand and seal this 23rd day of June, in the year of our Lord, nineteen hundred and eighty two and of our City this one hundred twenty-sixth. James G. DeMeyer Mayor City of Hutchinson 10-'A- r `k i ,o 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 WHEREAS, Marina Bianchi, a citizen of Rome, Italy, has been a welcome visitor to Hutchinson for the school year 1981 -82, and WHEREAS, Marina Bianchi has,.so comported herself to endear her to all the citi- zens of Hutchinson, and WHEREAS, it is our hope that Marina Bianchi will ever keep fond memories of her stay here, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, Marina Bianchi be, and hereby is, made an honorary citizen of the City of Hutchinson and is designated as ambassador extraordinary for the City wherever she may travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT, said Marina Bianchi be assured that she shall have and receive all the rights, benefits and responsibilities which shall devolve to said citizenship. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT, the name of Marina Bianchi shall be inscribed in the records and minutes of this City as a memorial that she is made a citizen, for the edification of posterity. Given under my hand and seal this 23rd day of June, in the year of our Lord, nineteen hundred and eighty two and of our City this one hundred twenty- sixth. James G. DeMeyer Mayor City of Hutchinson /® " ' • • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 22, 1982 I WATER $ SEWER FUND Northwestern National Bank Principal,interest,fee $ 80,211.00 Blue Cross Blue Shield July medical ins. 631.20 Central Garage Fund repair jobs & parts 2588.90 Cash Drawer #4 postage 1.40 Crown Life Ins. Co. July dental ins. 114.00 Electric Motor Co. repair motor 77.28 Equitable Life Assurance Soc. July LTD ins. 60.51 Lake Harriet Florist flowers -Dick Nagy 11.75 State Treasurer = C License -Nagy 15.00 Mn. Mutual Ins. Co. _Class July life ins. 48.64 Finley Mix meeting 6.10 RCM professional services 2017.24 State Treasurer PERA 309.18 Van Waters & Rogers chemicals 662.25 Zins Machining air value 7.00 Xerox Corporation paper 23.54 Gary Hotovec state fire school $ 86,784.99 GENERAL FUND *Twin Ticket Office 6o tickets $ 360.00 Lakeside Roller Rink 40% skating receipts - 508.00 Circulation Department 3 yr subscription 38.00 Airplus locks 20.00 American LaFrance partial payment fire truck 49,150.00 Berger Plbg & Htg. repairs 35.55 Dobratz repair blinds 240.00 Hutchinson Coop Oil 1p gas 7.50 Imperial Bank payment on radio console 2235.22 Joes Sport Shop 12 medals 36.00 Mn. State Armory Bldg. armory payment 7000.00 Sheraton Inn Northwest Chiefs Convention 217.79 Trans McLeod Inc. refund airport gas key 30.00 Warehouse Grocery t.paper 4.03 Judy Thunstrom skating instructor 48.00 Norman Wright % safety shoes 10.00 Gary Hotovec state fire school 75.00 Loren Larson state fire school 348.06 Mike Monge state fire school 75.00 Randy Redmann state fire school 75.00 Shirley Runberg softball refund 15.00 Barbara Stai softball refund 15.00 Nathan Smutka softball refund 15.00 Janet Kilian swimming refund 6.00 Wilma Young swimming refund 8.00 Louise Schroeder swimming refund 8.00 Robert Corl softball refund 230.00 Dan Hoeft baseball registration fee 10.00 Julie A. Moline deposition fee 385.00 James R. Maves deposition fee 216.30 //-a-, -2- Quad State Industries tank gaskets 41.72 Cokato Tractor Salvage manifold 70.00 Pecco Rentals Inc. repairs 41.63 Doug Meier 50 steel posts 92.50 Mary Haugen intown mileage 67.00 Marlys Hoeft supplies 7.50 Shirley Wurdell softball refund 7.00 Michael Carls league of cities 208.01 A $ B Electric repairs 48.87 Browns Greenhouse flowers 46.58 B & R Growers flowers 25.00 Blue Cross Blue Shield july medical ins. 7563.24 Central Garage Fund repair jobs 4 parts 3261.43 Copy Systems Inc. repairs 51.00 Cash Drawer #4 cash expenses 43.85 Central Mn. Communications repairs 14.55 Coast to Coast supplies 3.63 Co. Treasurer dl fees for county 86.50 Crown Life Ins. Co. july dental ins. •1378.96 Anne Stoeckman, Co. Recorder recording fees 10.00 Equitable Life Assurance Soc. july LTD ins. 627.32 Bruce Ericson mileage 113.87 Pamida film $ box 50.96 Great Plains Supply Co. parts 178.60 George Field registration fees 17.58 Henrys Candy Co. arena supplies 356.75 Hutchinson Leader publication costs 429.76 Ind. School Dist. #423 lifeguard,custodian,supervisor 469.20 Itasca Equipment Co. spreader 1590.00 Jahnke Red Owl supplies 7.39 James DeMeyer memorex tapes 14.19 KDUZ concert advertising 600.00 Keefe, Schantzen,Schaefer legal fees 3451.30 Logis computer charges 1678.61 Lake Harriet Florist flowers- Warnke 14.00 Mn. Mutual Ins. Co. july life ins. 514.14 Kenneth Merrill league of cities 289.99 MN Fin. Officers Assn. dues 60.00 Ralph Neuman league of mn. cities 201.87 Northland Beverages May invoices 595.85 Dean O'Borsky expenses 34.49 Pitney Bowes postage meter rental 55.50 Gary Plotz league of mn. cities 110.03 Pikal Music Store supplies 4.19 Mn. State Treasurer boat registrations 302.00 Swanke Motors Inc. 3/4 ton truck 5000.00 Swanke Motors Inc. repairs 982.04 Suziki Sports Center part 3.80 James Schaefer 11 month salary 798.44 Shopko flowers 22.66 State Treasurer PERA 3621.58 University of Mn. film rental 9.00 Xerox Corp. maint.agreement $ paper 829.04 Zins Machining repairs 12.00 West Pub. Co. annual charge for service 40.00 Woolworths curtin rods 7.62 $ 97,224.19 -3- Nursing Home Bonds American National Bank interest 4 service fee 11,205.00 Hospital Bonds of 1977 1st State Bank of St. Paul principal,interest $ service fee 59,604.25 Bonds of 1976 State of Minnesota refund 61.18 NW National Bank of Mpls. principal,interest & service fee 180,547.15 Bonds of 1980 1st National Bank of Mpls. principal,interest & service fee 115,926.30 1980 Tax Increment Bonds Kraus Anderson 10,000.00 1981 Fire Hall Const. Bonds The Circul Air Corp. equipment 9200.00 Lloyd Schlueter paint 202.44 Improvement Bond Fund Bond Fund of 1976 to close out the following bond funds Bonds of 1968,SW Storm Sewer bonds 1969, Bonds of 1969 & Bonds of 1970 202,356.70 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE - Griggs Cooper $ Co. wine & liquor 1397.74 Twin City Wine Co. wine & liquor 1546.12 Old Peoria Co. wine $ liquor 717.68 Old Peoria Co. wine & liquor 1361.64 Griggs Cooper & Co. wine & liquor 2298.90 Ed Phillips $ Sons. wine $ liquor 2592.47 Hutchinson Utilities electricity 476.69 Northland Beverages May invoices 192.20 Coca Cola Bottling May invoices 462.50 Twin City Pricing $ Labels labels 231.33 Junker Sanitation may refuse service 93.00 Schlueter Refrigeration check conditioner 22.70 Nationwide Papers bags 392.78 Internal Revenue Service liquor tax stamp 54.00 City of Hutchinson,general fund payr6l and bal. on 1981 7759.96 Commissioner of Revenue May & June sales tax 7011.35 Midwest Wine Co. wine 773.75 Old Peoria Co. liquor $ wine 1502.05 Ed Phillips & Sons. liquor & wine 2012.18 Griggs Cooper $ Co. liquor $ wine 2830.23 $ 33,729.27 THE HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL FOR YOUR INFORMATION The Hutchinson Safety Council met May 24th at 12:00 noon at the Evergreen Apartment Nutrition Center. There were 13 members present. The meeting was called to order by President Myron Johnson. The April minutes were approved as read. No bills were presented. Old Business: Fair Booth -- Still checking out location and nothing definite yet. Drawing for prizes: Donations only will be accepted and contacts will be made for these items. Jim Hudson will head a committee for these donations. New Business: June meeting will be at the new fire hall, on June 28th. The fire hall open house will be on June 6th and all members are invited to come. Larry Ladd spoke on city and other trucks filling water from pumps in the South Park and not blocking their wheels when children are around or making trucks stationery when filling. Also do they'contain chemicals and /or do they have any spillage. Ralph Neumann will check into this and report at a later meeting. George Field stated that fireworks are not allowed. Rules and regulations will be published in the Hutchinson Leader. The meeting was adjourned by motion. Submitted by: M;ron.Johnson, President Loretta F. Pishney, Secr. Treas. Treasurer's Report: Balance on hand May 1, 1982 163.41 Deposits: none Disbursements: none Balance on hand May 31, 1982 163.41 d (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 _MEMORANDUM AOR YOUR hN DATE. June 16, 1982 FORMATION TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: GARY PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR - , --- - - - - -- - - - - -- SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS - JIM & DICK MCCLURE As per the request of the Mayor, I am placing in writing the information that the city had at the time Jim and Dick McClure requested industrial revenue bonds. First, attached is a copy of the application for $900,000 in bonds (previously in the Council packet).. You may note that the limited partners were not mentioned within the application, therefore, I have contacted Attorney Jerry Gilligan of the Dorsey Law Firm. Attorney Gilligan stated that the application, itself, does not require the listing of the limited partners and it is not customary. Therefore, he stated the application does not have to be redone. Second, the mention of "limited partners" was made at the workshop on the S &L project and possibly_at other times, however, it was not discussed in detail. Third, I would suggest that the City Attorney possibly explain how a "limited partnership" is generally established, in view of a 5% equity interest of the McClures. From information by prior conversation with Attorney Jim Schaefer, a limited partnership generally does not place the liabilities of the project on "limited" partners other than their equity investment. Furthermore, he stated that the general partnership can have a minority equity interest and accept the liabilities of the project, while maintaining the day -to -day operation and control of the project. Again, the City Attorney can further clarify "limited partnership." Fourth, the McClures and restaurant chain have provided financial stat m to the city auditing firm, as per city council resolution policy Past practice has been that this information has been supplied directly from the requester to the accounting firm. The purpose of this consultation with certified accountants is to determine whether or not the general partnership (Jim and Dick McClure) can handle the liabilities of the project. Again, if there needs to be any clarification on the "legality" of where the potential liabilities exist, I defer to Jim Schaefer. MEMORANDUM June 16, 1982 Page 2 Fifth, Gayle Wick has requested to know the names of the limited partners. I contacted Jim McClure on or about June 16th and he stated he would supply this information to the City Council at or immediately preceding the re -start of the Industrial Revenue Bond Hearings scheduled for July 13, 1982. Furthermore, Jim would provide the Council with a partnership agreement at that time, although it has not been drafted at the time of this phone call Sixth, to assure the Mayor and Council that proper disclosure is being made, I have requested Attorney Jerry Gilligan to place in writing the disclosure requirements, if any. ' Seventh, irregardless of the legal ramifications, if any, Jim McClure has made it clear that this information will be provided to the Council at or precedent to the July 13 public hearing. attachments cc: Jim & Dick McClure Jim Schaefer, City Attorney Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey Law Firm. GP /hs r a This Application mut•: be submitted to Comminioner in dupli.-at• STATE OF MINNESOTA ` DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE — SECURITIES DIVISION *= APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PROJECT Date Apri l 23, 1482 - To: Minnesota Department of Commerce _ Securities Division • - 500 Metro Square Building SL Paul, Minnesota 55101 The governing body, of HuTGHIw5ol11 County of MGL.�bD Minnesota; hereby app'ies -to _ the Commissioner. of_ the State of Minnesota, Securities Division of the Department -of.- Commerce, -for .approval _of this community's proposed municipal-- Industrial- Revenue Bond issue; as required by Section -1, Subdivision -7; Chapter =474, Minnesota Statutes - ' - We have entered into preliminary discussions with: _ z FIRM RICHARD t. _.and Jpr1lE5 M. MCGLUR6 ADDRESS ! �HWy 1 WIST PO Box 24$' ciTy 141tTGI41A1150N y STATE - M IMM65arA State of Incorporation NIA Anorney -- W. ?�*A$ -=- Address -- CtTt2EAJ5 BANK QL[�S }l�l�lT{l 11SOW - J* _Fame of Project L QLLILDIIJG R6i�EIJEtOPrnEAIT <'. ...� * ^ I'; i - This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): C e-nem _0nS RuC-r "I x rT -�T� G�.M¢,y{.� • --ir .�.��f �"� • t:s?� �•f,Y� �" .+��:i� "�,` -... :3.�- � � i, ; L � .; �; l v r _ '- ' _ .. The funds received from the sale of the Industrial Revenue Bonds will be used to (general nature of project): 'D60ELoP A 4(psen Qa- cat,-4 bulldlna in%o a rt�a l , otfIre fts +auran+ 6e -n4er - It will be located in RUtC,*H )SOA) r MN ' The total bond issue will be approximately S900,000 - to be applied toirvard payment of costs now estimated as follows: - _ Cost Item. - -_ _ _ - Amount Land Acquisition and Site Development S166 000 Construction Contracts 900 Equipment Acquisition and installation Architectural and Engineering Fees _ _Z-3 030 Legal Fees :: '4:_ own Interest during Construction - Initial Bond Reserve Contingencies '' a '� _ ( _ 23 ODD - 0--A ♦ '• .�.,:lC•�/.� ?:_ _ � _ -. (.�. :i.'.•.'s",.:r"t„ *- `- 'r +�~` e ►�y .:X 1,�f• =.2Y►. 6 Li (612; 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 June 9, 1982 Jim Junker Junker Sanitation 417 South Martha Street Stillwater, MN 55082 Dear Jim: Re: Park Barrels POT y oU'I AA'' 0� The City Parks and Recreation Director has reviewed the refuse contract between the City and you, and pointed out that "park barrels" must be emptied by Junker Sanitation. The City requests these pickups to be done effective July 1, 1982. The size of the park barrels is not specified in the contract, so I would assume the barrels (55 gal.) we have been using since we originally entered into the agreement are fine. Sincerely, CITY OF HUTCHINSON Gary D. lotz City Administrator t. copy: Mayor and City Council Bruce Ericson hs N r, u C'%nC6'2C�D I c!t"Y OF f "rU7 -C f /fVS4fV 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (612) 587 -5151 EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL DATE June 18, 1982 —n NAME AND ADDRESS Lori Galles, 734 Harrington, Hutchinson G JOB TITLE T BAIL Coach SUPERVISED BY John McRaith, Bruce Ericson �p EMPLOYMENT STATUS X New Employee Other: (:> Full Time X Part Time or Seasonal Z PAY RATE $3.70 COMMENTS Replacement for a summer employee previously approved who is not now available. The above personnel action conforms to adopted personnel policy and to the council approved selection process. r Hea Personnel CoordThator City Administrator 3 -81 h 1] (612) 587 -5151 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Clerk CITY OF HUTCHINSON Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Gary: June 8, 1982 n �23k567 &y\ FOR YOU R �NFOR M,gr /oN RE: Freitag vs. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 80 -H -58 Since we have heard nothing further from Plaintiffs attorney regarding the possibility of further proceedings in this-Matter, I am-assuming that he has decided against appealing the decision of U.S. District Court Judge Diana E. Murphy to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. As such, I am proceeding to close my file at this time. I am enclosing a bill for services rendered during the year 1982. JHS:ka Enclosure Sincerely yours, ')-a� --A, 4A-0� James H. Schaefer City Attorney I R KEEFE, SCHANTZEN & SCHAEFER � ATTORNEYS AT LAW 246 MAIN STREET SOUTH P.O. BOX 220 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 JOHN E. KEEPS MILTON D. SCHANTZEN JAMES H. SCHAEFER City of Hutchinson Hutchinson, MN 55350 June 8, 1982 S T A T E M E N T r6 s E � � S a HONE 587 -2163 AREA CODE 612 RE: Freitag vs. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 80 -H -58 1 -11 -82 Review documents provided by insurance company. 1.3 1 -12 -82 Review of documents received from Fritz Brown. 1.6 1 -14 -82 Review of Motions, Affidavits, discussion with 18 hours 0A6NQ Total Balance $1,080.00 Molinen; letters to Plotz, Bahr, Swanson. 2.1 1 -19 -82 Call from Molinen, letter to Molinen. .4 2 -3 -82 Obtain signatures of Swanson, arrange for signature of Bahr. 1.0 2 -5 -82 Letter to Molinen .3 2 -15 -82 Review Motions, Memorandum, letter to Plotz. 1.7 2 -23 -82 Review Freitag's reponse to motion. 1.8 3 -3 -82 Conference with Brown in Minnespolis, attend hearing and oral arguments, conference with Brown and Anderson. 7.0 3 -15 -82 Review Order of Dismissal, letter to Plotz .8 18 hours 0A6NQ Total Balance $1,080.00 �- ROW RIVER RErffIONAL LIBRARY / May 10, 1982 A The Crow River Regional Library Board met at the Litchfield Library on May 10, 1982. Present: Dorothy Hinseth, Sunburg Representing: Kandiyohi County Ellen Moench, Eden Valley Meeker County Jeanne Lundstrom, Cosmos 6Z8910j >, Meeker County Harriet Berg, Dassel �c, 2�� Meeker County Albert Linde, Hutchinson �"� �sz� Hutchinson Delores Condon, Litchfield 1982 Litchfield Judy Johnson, Litchfield o REt.j:. Litchfield f 0 Dennis Ulrich, Renville 6 , °° Renville Jeanette Buchanan, Willmar c`'� 8Y.___ __ -- o.L Willmar LeRoy Sanders, Willmar SZ 6Z�2 O John Esbjornson, Willmar Willmar C George Jepson, Winsted McLeod County John Horrocks, Hutchinson Hutchinson Burton Sundberg, Director, CRRL -rT Kathy Matson, Asst. Dir., CRRL Absent: Orlynn Mankell, New London* Representing: Kandiyohi County Jean Stranberg, Atwater Kandiyohi County Earl Mathews, Glencoe McLeod County O DO Lilah Buhr, Stewart* McLeod County Lionel Barker, Glencoe* Glencoe Wayne Hebrink, Renville Kandiyohi County Pauline Reigstad, Bird Island ** Bird Island * Excused absence * * Has resigned and not been replaced. Vice Chairperson George Jepson called the meeting-to order. Jeanette Buchanan was appointed acting secretary for the meeting. Horrocks/Lundstrom moved the April minutes be approved.. Carried. Directorls Report: _ 1.. Systems Directors meeting: a. Concern expressed that Senator Peter Stumpf would not be the Chairperson for the Joint House /Senate Education Subcommittee on Libraries. Board members were to contact Mr. Sundberg regarding any possibilities to fill that vacancy. b. Public Library Goals for Minnesota Libraries - needs to be reviewed and revised. c. Revision and consolidation of Library laws will be sent to all regional boards for review. d. The next System Directorts meeting will include discussion of legislative Platform-to be developed by MfA for next biennium. e. Systems Directors will be meeting with coordinators of multi - library systems to discuss mutual and overlapping roles and responsibilities. - f. Current and future funding of interlibrary loans discussed. Currently LSCA/Federal Funds pay for this. g. State Aid FY 1983 --15% of aid will be delayed until 1st quarter of 1984FY, or after July of 1983. We may have a cash flow problem as a result. 2. Revised statistical report for May was reviewed. 3. Book sales was over $200.00. 4r Glencoe Open House for remodeled facilities will be held early in June. (June 13, 2:00 -5:00 p.m.) 5. Referendum on Grove City Library, etc. next week. (It passed.) 6. June 23 - Workshop to be held at the State Hospital for libraries that use volunteer. Funding was thru a SAMMIE grant. Approximately 5 libraries in the Crow River Regional Library system use volunteers. A librarian and one of the volunteers from these libraries will be attending. Ulrich/Sanders moved bills be approved. Carried. Committee Reports: 1. SAMMIE advisory committee and governing board met. Jeanne Lundstrom/ Harriet Berg attended. Exofficio members are not voting members according to OPLIC. No action was taken on the OCLC terminal grant. Only 1 project may be funded due to financial cut backs. The two applicants for this grant are Crow River Regional Library and Worthington Community College. 2. Staff Policy Committee's next meeting is May 24th. 3. ALTA -WILL Workshop, Minneapolis, Buchanan/Buhr/Barker attended. Mr. Sundberg also was an observer. Jeanette Buchanan highlighted the workshop. Conference book was passed around for Board members to review. 4. Survey Summary - Kathy Matson is currently preparing summaries of the survey. 5. Long Range Plan. The results from the above survey will be used to help develop the long range plan which is due at the OPLIC office by June 30th. This Plan will be mailed to Board members as soon as it is completed to give Board Members time to study it before the June meeting. (Sent with agenda for June.) 6. Question on Limited General Audit. This is a spot check type of audit that does not go into detail for every month. Rather a minimum of 2 or 3" months during given year are specifically audited. It is also limited to the summary of cash receipts and disbursements. Communications: a. MLA will be held in Duluth, May 13 -15._ No Board members planning to attend. b. Letters from Senators Boschwitz and Durenberger were read regarding Mr. Sundberg's letters to them asking their support for LSCA funding. r. Letter from Bea Thompson, Litchfield Library Board member, thanking Crow River Regional Library for sending her to the ALTA -WILL Conference. d! letter of resignation from Pauline Reigstad was read. Bird Island has been unable to replace her as of this date. e. Crow/ River Regional Library system has received the video cassette series "Governors of Minnesota ". This was given to all Regional Libraries by the University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. . f. Letter from Paul London, Editor of West Central Tribune was read along with Mr. Sundberg's response. Mr. London questioned our policy regarding bookmobile service. Mr. Sundberg discussed the current bookmobile stop policy. Unfinished Business -- None. Mr. Sandberg demonstrated data -base searching on a portable terminal which was made available for a short time in the Crow River Regional Library area by SAMMIE funding. New Business: 1. Bookmobile stops. The current bookmobile stop policy has been left to the discretion of the staff. In the past, the Board took action that there should not be any more public school stops added. A motion for the development of a policy regarding bookmobile stops was tabled until the June meeting. Motion by Sanders /Johnson. Carried. 2. Budget for 1983• Budget Committe will be meeting in the near future to finalize the 1983 Budget. 3. New Minnesota `trustees Manuals were distributed to Board members. Materials in the manual will be discussed at future meetings. Meeting adjourned. Jeanette Buchanan Secretary May 1982 CROW RIVER REGIONAL LIBRARY ' Treasurer's Report LeRoy Sanders, Treasurer. INCOME THIS MONTH YEAR TO DATE BUDGET Balance 8(15,1+05.73) S (81340.87) { Receipts: State/Federal Aid 17,396.00 46,618.00 113,000.00 Kandiyohi County 369252.00 72,504.00 Meeker County- 151000.00 50,233.00 McLeod County 55,074.00 McLeod County (1981 Receivable)_ 5,432.08 -0- Willmar . 29,66o.5o 59,321.00 Litchfield 15,394•oo 30,788.00 Hutchinson 211993.50 431987.00 Glencoe 10,073.00 20,146.00 Bird Island 1,524.00 3,048.00 6,o96.00 Renville 3,349•OO 6,698.00 Petty Cash 2,516.10 11,275.14 22,000.00 Gifts 161.22 161.22 -O- Other 209.09 988.21 10,000.00 I Total Receipts: $21,806.41 $199,244.65 &489,847.00 From 1981 Budget _ 5,000.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS & BAIANCE: _ ._. -_ .,• -. .. 8 6,400.68 $190,903.78 w�- sew 8494,847.00 �w wf T -. _'qT) YTD % OF EXP Ci1:.RE'IT EXPE .- biTURES EiP,56 IThRES TO EST i,UL`GET ACCT GROUP... .00 .00 .00% .00 RSONAL SERVICES. SALARI55 '269752.43 1309744.44 41.73% 3129951.00 �'JSPITAL MF5ICAL INSURANCE 11345.10 69725.50 51.73% 139000.00 P=RA ti140•SOCIAL SECUPITY 2.377.50 119770.77 42.04%. 239000.00 ACCT GROUP... 301475.03 1499240.71 42.16% 3531951.00 ERIALS - - ROOKS - ADULT .: 116 ;0.36 129371.Ofl` -.' 2d.07Y •449066.00 9CIKS - CHILDREtJ "" 19179.21 39936.39 24.12% 149000.01 PPI3G I C AL S 164.98 19093.07 13.66; 39000.00 PA4PHL =_TS .00 16.94 6.47% 200.00 AUDIO VISUAL 16.90 329.52 3.241' 49000.00 Ttr`TI S ,- 000 400 .00% 100.00 RINCING .00 .OJ .00% 500.00 NICROFOR4S .00 40.50 13.50% 300.00 ACCT .GROUP... 2.991.35 171787.50 24.96% 71.265.04 '.A I NTENAVICE CUSTiDIAL SUPPLIES AUlD SERVICES 2.2.95 233.35 26.522 810.00 TELP HONE t ERMINAL_ 4 78.62 1.974.61 -._ 42.022 4000.00 VEHICLE OPGRATIDN - I:lCC IkS'r, " >4 750.33 4tl ?1.20 ;: _: _ 37.92% 11100t..G0 ,: "ACCT GROUP...' 1.251.90 6,379.36" -- 33.43% 16,580.v ^0 ',UPPLIES E PRINTING 572.95 21730.15 24.32% 11,000.00 ZQn7TING AND PROGRAMMING 39.88 120.47 12.70% 1,5C0.00 '05T►G� 415.41 29237.64 5U.66% 41P400.03 uILEAGE AlvO MEETINGS - 708.33 2.•350.79; 47.0 ?% , x-,3000.00 vEMBERSHIPS .00 3no.00 5_0.01% 500.30 I ►.SURA'JC° .00 1s894.00 73o.23A 3,22 00.00 EIUIPMENT RENTAL 1.203.28 4.256.3Q 38.69% -1I 000.00 A031TING SERVICES 990.00 990.00 104.21Z' 95C.00 CGDKG£PIMG SERVICES 225.00 1-. 125. 00 41.67% 2,700.00 Cam CATALOG .00 .00 .00% 39003.00 _ ACCT GROUP... 49155 ^35 16.- 064.64 35.42% 459350.00 GAPITAI DUTL4Y � -- -- EAUIPMENT .00 333.54 8.34% 4.000.00 °RANCH AMOTIZATIoN FUND .00 .00 .00: 700.00 YcHICLc AmIRTIZATION FUND .00 .00• .00% 39000.00 SAVI4 COPIER .00 49539.50 .00% .00 ACCT GROUP... .00 4.873.10 63.29% 7,700.00_ OP•G9 TOTAL... 38.873.63 1449345.31 39.27% 4949847.GO Reversal (Voided check) i 15.00 Investments redeemed 36,700.00 170,900.00 Investments purchased 18,920.00 182,166.42 Fhding cash balance (14,692.95) (14,692.95) Savings Pass Book: $28,551.29 as of May 31, 1982 2,646.64 Amortization Minds (not including interest but including 31,197.93 re- payment of $140.00 per month) �S �L`+•. '4 � _`.+i\ �.`n.:�Z 'tj` / 4. sy, Ty ;•.. $t a.'v �#'i"i�'f;i ^. r 'Z_ �•d .s i.4 - ,S .'F. _. wyY t - MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 15, 1982 NF�R�P�t�N FOR Y�uR t 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Don Erickson at 7:30 P.M. with the following members present: Ted Beatty, Larry Romo, Clint Tracy and Elsa Young in addition to Chr. Don Erickson. Absent: Jim Johnson and Roland Ebent. Also attending were City Administrator Gary Plotz, City Attorney Jim Schaefer and Director of Engineering Marlow Priebe. 2. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting dated May 18, 1982 were unanimously approved on motion by Larry Romo and seconded by Ted Beatty. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY MR. JACK KJOS The hearing was opened at 7:31 P.M. by Chairman Erickson with the reading of publication #2934 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. No one was present voicing any objection to thi -s request. It was explained to the Commission by Mr. Plotz that Mr. Kjos has requested to add on a 17' x 14' porch to the west side of his house. He will be in compliance with all the setbacks. The existing garage is non - conforming so therefore, a conditional use permit is necessary. The hearing was closed at 7:32 P.M. on motion by Ted Beatty. Sec - onded by Clint Tracy, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested conditional use permit. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUE5T`FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY MR. HOVERSTEN /MR. CORNELL Chairman Erickson opened the hearing at 7:33 P.M. with the reading of publication #2395 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. 0 Hutchinson Planning Commission Minutes - June 15, 1982 40 3 r Page 2 City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the letter in the packet containing staffs recommendation. It was requested in the letter that the building be moved for the road right of way. Mr. Hoversten commented they plan to expand at a later date and questioned if this would be possible should the building be moved. After discussion and a closer look at the plans, it was determined there would be room for expansion even if the building were moved. Staff also requested a warranty deed for the portion of Third Ave. connecting to Hwy. # 7. Mr. Hoversten stated that wouldn't be a problem. It was also noted that the property owner would then no longer need to pay taxes on the portion of property deeded to the city. On motion by Ted Beatty, the hearing was closed at 7:42 P.M. Seconded by Elsa Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Clint Tracy then made the motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested conditional use permit with the stipulations listed in the letter from staff. Seconded by Ted Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST SUBMITTED BY STAFF FOR AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 The hearing was opened at 7:43 P.M. by Chairman Erickson with the reading of publication # 2936 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 3, 1982. Director of Engineering Marlow Priebe explained the added changes amending the zoning ordinance were establishing newly formed dist- ricts for mobile homes and mobile home parks. He went on to say the R -4 district regulations were similar to those of the R -2 district except that the setbacks were somewhat changed. The larger the mobile home, the greater the setback. Also two park- ing spaces are required for each mobile home. There were no comments from the audience. On motion by Ted Beatty, the hearing was closed at 7:52 P.M. Seconded by Larry Romo, the motion unanimously carried. Mr. Ted Beatty then made a motion to recommend approval of the amendment to the zoning ordinance to the city council and the deleting of section 7.14 Mobile Home Park Requirements. Second- ed by Clint Tracy, the motion carried unanimously. a • Hutchinson Planning Commission Minutes - June 15, 1982 4. OLD BUSINESS None 5. NEW BUSINESS Page 3 (a) DISCUSSION ON STORAGE OF WOOD WITHIN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON Building Official Homer Pittman explained that some cities have ordinances regulating the storage of wood. Discussion followed and it was questioned if there had been com- plaints. Mr. Plotz stated there were none that he knew of. Mr. Pittman stated his concern was that of'rodents possibly making homes in the wood piles. It was the consensus of the Commission that this would be very difficult to enact. They also felt they did not want to discourage the burning of wood. Mr. Pittman was instructed to get more information from other cities pertaining to regulations on the storage of wood. (b) REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION ON POSSIBLY BUILDING A 4 -PLEX IN A PUD IN STONEY POINT THIRD ADDITION Mr. Hal Wehmann spoke stating he felt he was in error coming to the Commission at this time but rather felt he should talk to the staff first.. They agreed to meet with them after the meeting. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ENGINEER Mr. Marlow Priebe pointed out an article in the Hutchinson Leader dated June 15, 1982 indicating that Witte's Appliance Service has moved to his home at 1004 Lewis Ave. S.W. It was questioned if this would be allowed under the present zoning. Discussion followed and some felt he may only be doing service work and special ordering. It was felt that staff should make him aware of what the possibilities are. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meet- ing adjourned at 8:10 P.M. on motion by Ted Beatty and seconded by Larry Romo. Motion unanimously carried. TOR 0 ��2�3�g151617f 9 m JUn 1982 co RECEIVED s L] 1 BURL(hGTON NORTHERN PUBLIC AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT N v V?� 176 East Fifth Street v St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 t� Telephone (612) 9,6-7665 �9 Mr. Gary D. Plotz June 4, 1982 14 City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Plotz: This is in response _to your inquiry as to the classification of the Hutchinson branch line. Our 1982 System Diagram Map will be released in about three weeks. At that time, I would suggest you contact me so we can review the future of this line. Sincerely, Dennis IV McLeod Director, . Branch Line Management C-7 McLeod 0 U Dana L. Reed n County Auditor t Y June 112 1982 Mr. Gary Plotz, Clerk City of Hutchinson City Hall Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Plotz: • GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336 • Phone [612] 864 -5551 ext. 210 This is to certify that the 1981 Estimated Market Value, Assessed Value and Captured Assessed Value for taxes payable_ in 1982 for Hutchinson City Redevelopment Tax Increment area are as follows: Estimated Market Value Assessed Value 10,920,952 4,243,235 Sincerely y J"4 � Dana L. Reed McLeod County Auditor DLR: j dh I Captured Ass'd Value 1,248,430 McLeod County Equal Opportunity Employer T 0 T G =�1 O 4 FOR YOUR INFORMATION MAMMA, - - - -� -, et■'�mm■ ® ®-an -im ■® ■� a �, �� 0 '� �° i° °..�' �Ci��lli 'i i.rs�C u ■.1n �o iC°�'11i �Cii ®i #� r� 'e� � .ui � C u�li n■ , ��ii>!i r r� � � Iur� H I 1 i �U�""1■ONN ■W.! 'o.fill�f .nllfa! ■;.IIIW■ �1i hl�ili '!!' ;t l !� ® �, � ®r Ali 11u i I 1 r " ■ un111■ r . , colt Err ! , r ! n ® >" rlr1t11 1 1 ■� ■ . 1dC !9■ m ■.1°Im !; y ®11 Of ® C n °. °! . , i! OI �r �i i . ■ w Irru � �ii ■;�� rr i �� of �na ■��i ,,��luu, • • ,.W Ir■. �� i1 i�" I�rr1'� , r Ira . ®rr I �ni;� .�.uii. u°n�i,.. unia■� ®1t , n ; to ®a �Cr1 . .. � I ° Ir r :. rr r� ! ' ! ► •,■ u�IS'�!■utl ( ;fir .y :�; ■ ,�; ._ :.! nil li �.rr 1 ' ■ ° u ■.m1 ni; C#°I ®;®1 �1 .z :1 � Nii91 ■ ■. .. i eat N11 o , , r ui � un• ■ �mla.�■ unln■� �� S I11 ■, tF : l.111111 ■i ; , ®a1 1 ,II1 �� r � �a�°... i ! • ° �. ' � iui' '��. :. � /l� '�rr��° il! 1 � � ! I8■i Wes■: In 1 i 1 .j •,