Loading...
cp10-25-1983 cHUTCH INSON CITY CALENDAR WEEK OF I' October 23 T 0 October 29 f1 r ?:003 V!EDRESDAY -26= 7:30 A.M. - Community Develop- ment Corp. Board Meeting at City Hall SUNDAY -23- a y. MONDAY -24- UNITED NATIONS DAY THURSDAY FRIDAY -27- -2g- ;t TUESDAY -25- k 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meet - ing at City Hall SATURDAY -29- W11", r r _ Ll i AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1983 A. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. /2. Invocation - Reverend Larry Baumann, St. Anastasia Catholic Church ,J3. Consideration of Minutes - Bid Opening of October 10, 1983 and Regular Meeting of October 11, 1983 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to approve as amended 4. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. J(a) Consideration of Ordinance Proposed by Committee of Electors and Petition Submitted for Sale of Intoxicating Liquor On Sunday Action - Motion to close hearing ✓(b) Consideration of Project 84 -03 - Stoney Point Addition Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve project and waive reading and adopt Resolution 5. Communications Requests and Petitions J(a) Update On Proposed Library Addition and Referendum with Presentation by Library Board Members Action - ,/(b) Consideration of Request by Hutchinson Rotary Club to Use Library Square to Operate A Food Stand for Crazy Days In July 1984 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request ,J(c) Consideration of Request for City Engineer to Attend Minnesota Public Works Association Fall Conference November 17 -18, 1983 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject J(d) Consideration of Request for City Administrator and Director of Engineering to Attend Annual Planning Institute On December 1, 1983 Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 25, 1983 6. Resolutions and Ordinances ,/(a) Resolution No. 7548 - Resolution Accepting Pledged Security from First State Federal Savings 5 Loan Association of Hutchinson, Minnesota Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt /(b) Resolution No. 7553 - Resolution for Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt VI (c) Resolution No. 7555 - Resolution of Appreciation to the Aid Association of Lutherans Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 7. Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions ✓(a) Monthly Financial Report - September 1983 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing V(b) Minutes of Library Board dated October 13, 1983 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing , c) Minutes of Planning Commission dated September 20, 1983 Action - Order by Mayor received for filing 8. Unfinished Business ,/(a) Consideration of Parks and Playground Contribution by Richard Schmidtbauer (DEFERRED OCTOBER 11, 1983) Action - Ab) Discussion of Cameo Cleaners Request for Extension of Time to Occupy Plowman Building (Requested by Pat Smith) Action - V(c) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Demolition of Plowman Building (DEFERRED OCTOBER 11, 1983) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid -2- L rl 6 COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 25, 1983 J (d) Consideration of Approval of A Portion of Project 84 -01 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution 9. New Business ✓(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service ;/(b) Consideration of Application for License to Sell Cigarettes at Retail By Allan E. Otremba for Scalawags Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue license J(c) Consideration of Request for Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance As Submitted By Gordon Hedlund with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading of Ordinance No. 21/83 and set second reading for November 8, 1983 f(d) Consideration of Request for Conditional Use Permit As Submitted by Slyter Builders for Kenneth Baumann with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7549 ,/(e) Consideration of Request for Variance As Submitted by Slyter Builders for Kenneth Baumann with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7550 ,/(f) Consideration of Request for Final Plat for Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition As Submitted by Bethke Construction, Inc. with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.,7551 -3- COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 25, 1983 ,/(g) Consideration of Request for Vacation of Easement As Submitted by Bethke Construction, Inc, with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion tyeject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading o Ordinance No. 22/83 and set second reading for November 8, 1983 ,(h) Consideration of Request for Conditional Use Permit As Submitted by Hutchinson Public Schools with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission with contingencies Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7552 �(i) Consideration of Request for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 4, As Submitted by Staff with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first" reading of Ordinance No. 19/83 and set second reading for November 8, 1983 V(j) Consideration of Final Plat for South Grade Road Subdivision with favor- able recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to approve - Motion to reject , /(k) Consideration of Proposed Legislation,HR4103 Cable Legislation Action - /(1) Consideration of Application for Snow Removal Permit 1. Harvey F. Getz 2. Lloyd Christensen 3. Leslie Johnson 4. Tony Forcier Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue permit ,/(m) Consideration of. Approving Plans and Specifications for Project 84 -02 and Ordering Advertisement for Bids Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifications and call for bids on December 12, 1983 - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7554 -4- r h COUNCIL AGENDA OCTOBER 25, 1983 10. Miscellaneous �(a) Communications from City Administrator • ✓(b) Communications from Director of Engineering 11. Claims Appropriations and Contract Payments �(a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds J12. Adjournment -5- # a MINUTES BID OPENING MONDAY, OCTOBER 10, 1983 The bid opening was called to order by City Administrator Plotz at 2:00 P.M. The following were present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Administra- tive Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 3152, Advertisement for Bids for Fire Barn Park- ing Lot, was dispensed with. The following bids were received and opened: J. W. Hanson Construction Co. Hutchinson, MN $15,990.25 The bid was referred to City staff for review. There being no further business, the bid opening adjourned at 2 :02 P.M. 0 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1983 1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor DeMeyer at 7:30 P.M., with the fol- lowing present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Kenneth Gruenhagen, Alderman Ted Beatty, and Mayor James G. DeMeyer. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer Marlow-V. Priebe, and City Attorney James Schaefer. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend Larry Baumann. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the bid openings of September 26, 1983, October 4, 1983 and October 6, 1983; Board of Review of September 27, 1983; and regular meeting of September 27, 1983 were approved as presented upon motion by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried. unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARING - 8 :00 P.M. (a) PROJECT 84 -02 Mayor DeMeyer called the hearing to order at 8:05 P.M. City Engineer Priebe presented a report on the six sections included in project 84 -02. He stated the subdivider had requested the improvements, at an estimated cost of $422,300. It was moved by Alderman Mlinar to close the hearing. Motion seconded by Alderman Beatty . and approved unanimously. Alderman Mlinar made the motion to approve the project and to waive read - ing and 'adopt Resolution No. 7539. Alderman Carls seconded the motion, and it unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLLS FOR PROJECT-83-02, OAKWOOD ADDITION: 1. ROLL NO. ".1Y2 The public hearing was called to order by.Mayor DeMeyer with the reading of Publication No. 3145. The Director of Engineering reported on the improvement of Oakwood Ad- dition by the construction;of sanitary sewer and appurtenances. The estimated cost of the project was $23,236.30. e COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 The motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen, seconded by Alderman Beatty, to close the hearing. Motion unanimously approved. 2. ROLL NO. 174 Publication No. 3146 was read by Mayor DeMeyer. A report was presented by the City Engineer on the improvement of Oakwood Addition by the construction of trunk storm sewer and appurtenances. It was stated the estimated cost would be $24,803.80. Alderman Gruenhagen moved to close the hearing. Motion seconded by Ald- erman Beatty and carried unanimously. 3. ROLL NO. 175 Mayor DeMeyer read Publication No. 3147 for Assessment Roll No. 175. City Engineer Priebe reported on the improvement of Oakwood Addition by the construction of lateral storm sewer and appurtenances, at an esti- mated cost of $7,861.30 for the project. It was moved by Alderman Gruenhagen, seconded by Alderman Beatty, to close the hearing. Motion approved unanimously. 4. ROLL NO. 176 Publication No. 3148, for Assessment Roll No. 176, was read by Mayor DeMeyer. The City Engineer reviewed the improvement for California Street, School Road and County Road 12 by construction of trunk storm sewer and appur- tenances. The estimated cost of the improvement was $169,320. The motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen to close the hearing. Motion seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously carried. 5. ROLL NO. 177 Publication No. 3149 was read by Mayor DeMeyer. It was reported by the Director of Engineering that the proposed assess- ment for the improvement of California Street, School Road and County Road 12 would be for construction of lateral storm sewer and appurtenances. The estimated cost of the project was $8,583.27. Alderman Gruenhagen moved to close the hearing. Alderman Beatty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. -2- i • COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 Alderman Beatty made the motion to approve Assessment Rolls No. 172, 174, 175, 176 and 177 and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 7540 - No. 7544. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and approved unanimously. City Engineer Priebe reported that bids were received on September 12, 1983 for Project 83 -02 and 83 -02 S.A.P. It was his recommendation to award the contract to Juul Contracting in the amount of $102,445 for Project 83 -02 and to Burschville Construction, Inc. in the amount of $68,789.25 for Project 83 -02 S.A.P. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 7546 and No. 7547 to award contracts. Motion unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF ISSUANCE OF "ON SALE" INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE TO ALLAN E. OTREMBA, PROSPECTIVE OWNER OF SCALAWAGS Mayor Delleyer opened the hearing with the reading of Publication No. 3155. There was no one present to object to the issuance of an "on- sale" intoxicating liquor license to Allan E. Otremba, prospective owner of Scalawags. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to close the hearing at 8:25 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously approved. Alderman Carls moved that based on the report received from the Police Department, to approve the application and issue an intoxicating liquor license. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. (d) REVIEW OF PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION OF T.H. 15 FROM SOUTH CITY LIMITS TO LINDEN AVENUE Mayor DeMeyer read a letter received from Roger L. Lund in which he pro- tested the proposed reconstruction of highway 15. His main concern was the driveway serving the residence of Edna A. Lund, located between South Grade Road and the east entrance into the Hutchinson Mall on the west side of T.H. 15. The State alignment map showed the driveway would be closed off, with no apparent alternative access to the property. Two representatives from the IN/DOT District 8 Willmar office were present at the meeting; namely, Ben Sieck, Design Engineer and Gene Setrum, Pre- liminary Design Engineer. Mr. Setrum reviewed the proposed plan on the map. He stated this was a safety improvement project rather than reconstruction. He explained there would be a raised concrete island erected to divide the two lanes of traf- fic, starting at Linden Avenue and continuing to Baltimore Street, with the provision for a left turn lane. There would be a semi -four traffic control at South Grade Road intersection. -3- w COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 There was discussion of realigning Brown Street and Echo Drive to allow for an intersection for traffic to flow to and from and across highway 15. On the south end of Main Street there was the possibility of three property owners losing access to the street in front of their houses. It was the consensus of the Council that the three property owners should be made aware of the situation. The City cost for the project was estimated at $200 - 250,000. It was pointed out that Federal Aid Urban funding could be applied to the im- provement. The State's goal was to have a construction letting in July 1985, with construction in 1986. At this time the State requested pre- liminary approval of the plans, and a finalized plan would be presented to the Council at a later date, with a hearing held for public input. An inquiry was made regarding a sidewalk or walkway crossing in the area of the Hutchinson Mall. The response was that no sidewalk was planned by the State inasmuch as it would be the responsibility of the City to pro- vide one. There would, however, be a push button crossing. City Engineer Priebe stated the City would consider a sidewalk after the curbing was in place. Alderman Mlinar moved to close the hearing at 9:15 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and approved unanimously. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to approve the proposed improvement of T.H. 15 and to waive reading and adopt Reso- lution No. 7545. Motion carried unanimously. 5. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) CONSIDERATION OF INITIATIVE PETITION CONCERNING SUNDAY SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR City Administrator Plotz reported that a petition with 447 signatures was submitted last Friday, and an additional petition of 65 signatures was sub- mitted on Monday. The names on the petitions had been verified for 15 per cent of the registered voters from the last City election. Following discussion, Alderman Beatty moved to set a public hearing for October 25, 1983 at 8:00 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unani- mously approved. 6. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 12/83 - AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE LICENSING OF PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF -4- • 0 COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Beatty, to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 673. The motion carried with roll call vote of Aldermen Gruenhagen, Beatty, Carls and Mlinar voting aye and Mayor DeMeyer voting nay. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 20/83 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LOCATED IN ROLLING OAKS FOURTH ADDITION Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Beatty to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 674. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and approved unanimously. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 7536 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $62,500 FROM THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION After discussion, Alderman Beatty made the motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7536. Motion seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and unanimously carried. (d) RESOLUTION NO. 7537 - TRANSFERRING $20,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL FUND Following discussion, it was unanimously approved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7537 upon motion by Alderman Gruenhagen and seconded by Alderman Beatty. (e) RESOLUTION NO. 7538 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SECURITIES TO FIRST BANK MINNEAPOLIS After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7538. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and car- ried unanimously. 7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (a) BUILDING OFFICIAL'S MONTHLY REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1983 There being no discussion, the report was ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. (b) MINUTES OF HOSPITAL BOARD DATED AUGUST 16, 1983 AND SEPTEMBER 7, 1983 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (c) MINUTES OF LIBRARY BOARD DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 1983 -5- COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. (d) MINUTES OF NURSING HOME BOARD DATED AUGUST 18, 1983 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be received for filing. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF PARKS AND PLAYGROUND CONTRIBUTION BY RICHARD SCHMIDTBAUER (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983) The motion was made by Alderman Beatty to defer this item to the next Council meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and unanimously approved. (b) CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT 84 -01, HILLTOP ADDITION (DEFERRED SEPT. 27, 1983) City Attorney Schaefer stated the subdivision agreement for Hilltop Addi- tion was valid and showed how assessments were to be appropriated. At this point the City has two viable alternatives: 1) The City could take the position that the subdivision agreement was valid, and it had nothing to do with the agreement, or 2) The City could take over that portion of the special assessment that would be re- assessed so that no one paid a higher assessment than what the subdivision agreement called for. City Engineer Priebe explained the background of the addition. He stated all the proposed costs had been lumped together for an equal total. One other option would be for the City to discontinue the project until such time as it was determined how the costs would be assessed. The motion was made by Alderman Beatty to approve the project and assess it on the basis of the subdivision agreement and to set a public hearing date for October 25, 1983 at 8:00 P.M. The motion died for lack of a second. Alderman Gruenhagen moved to defer action to the first City Council meet- ing in November. The motion was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried, with Aldermen Gruenhagen, Carls, Mlinar and Mayor DeMeyer voting aye and Alderman Beatty voting nay. (c) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR DEMOLITION OF PLOWMAN BUILDING (DEFERRED OCTOBER 4, 1983) City Attorney Schaefer reported he had received a telephone call from At- torney Roger Gilmer requesting this item be deferred to the next Council meeting. His client, Pat Smith, is in the process of locating another COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 0 site for his dry cleaning business and might need to ask for an extension of time to remain in the Plowman Building after his lease expires. It was moved by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, to defer the item to the next Council meeting. Motion unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MASONIC TEMPLE PARKING LOT (DEFERRED OCTOBER 6, 1983) City Engineer Priebe reported one bid was received for the Masonic Temple parking lot improvement. The bidder was J. W. Hanson Construction Com- pany in the amount of $20,650. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to approve and award the bid to J. W. Hanson Construction Company. Motion carried, with the Chair abstaining from voting. (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY JEFF HAAG, WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION, WITH CONTINGENCY (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 27, 1983) The Director of Engineering reported the applicant had submitted addi- tional material on his proposed four -unit condominium. It was recommended to allow Jeff Haag to proceed with construction, contingent upon approval of the County Recorder, with no sale or occupancy to take place prior to the association papers being submitted to the City Council for review. After discussion, Alderman Beatty moved to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 7528, with the stipulations stated above. Motion seconded by the Chair and approved unanimously. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES TASK FORCE CONCERNING PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND RECREATION FACILITY, AND PRESENTATION BY REPRESENTA- TIVES OF TRUCKER DEVELOPMENT INC., REQUESTING TO BE DESIGNATED DEVELOPER OF PROJECTS FOR SIX MONTHS WITH AN INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO BE SET Prior to the presentation, City Attorney Schaefer commented on two areas of concern he had regarding the proposed project; namely, the feasibility of the City entering into a long -term lease and the necessity to comply with competitive bidding statutes. Mr. Michael Saxton, Development Director for Trucker Development Inc, pre- sented a report on the four properties involved in their company's pro- posed project. He stated Frank Fay would be a partner for the project -7- COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 to renovate the Hutch Hotel. The first floor of the hotel would be re- modeled for commercial retail space, while the second and third floor would be used for residential condominium housing. However, parking space was needed for initial benefits. In conjunction with the hotel renovation, Trucker Development had secured an option to purchase for the Leader building and the Vision Center building. The underground area of the Leader building would provide a garage facility for hotel parking, while the Vision Center property would release the easement across the parking lot property needed to erect a public administration building. It was proposed that Trucker Development would also acquire the old fire station from the City at the appraised value of $134,000 to be used as a garage for the new 4,400 square foot, two -story City building. A lease back arrangement would be made available to the City. It was also proposed that Trucker Development be designated to work on the construction of a two -stage recreation facility. The company was prepared to begin architectural drawings and to develop a financing plan for presentation at a public hearing and for Council ap- proval. They would not request any reimbursement of the expenditures to prepare the finance plan. Trucker Development would act as construction manager of the project, with everything bid locally. Mr. Saxton requested that Trucker Development be given a six month exclu- sive developer agreement,whereby there would be no cost to the City and the City would be under no obligation to the developer. The appropriate hearings would be held for public input, with the Council to set a public hearing date within 30 days from today. Trucker Development would be re- questing an industrial revenue bond at the hearing. He further stated, the company would be willing to work with a committee appointed by the Council to design the building, with possible construction in 1983. Alderman Beatty made the motion to accept the recommendations of the Pub- lic Facilities Task Force and sub - committee to designate Trucker Develop- ment Inc. as developer of the two projects, public administration build- ing and recreation building, for a six month period, with exclusive de- velopment rights. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously car- ried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF 1984 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND MCLEOD COUNTY The 1984 Assessment Agreement between the City of Hutchinson and McLeod County was presented. The assessment services would cover 3,540 parcels at a rate of $5.20 per parcel for a total cost of $18,408. After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen, to approve and enter into a contract with McLeod County. Motion approved unanimously. -8- v � • 0 0 COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR City Administrator Plotz reported two more candidates had filed for the November 8 election, namely Pat Mikulecky and Marlin Torgerson for the position of alderman. Mr. Plotz stated there was interest in holding a workshop on the proposed maintenance assessments prior to the public hearing scheduled for Octo- ber 17, 1983. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Council mem- bers not to hold another workshop. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING City Engineer Priebe reported one bid was received for the fire barn park- ing lot from J. W. Hanson Construction Co. in the amount of $15,990.25. It was his recommendation to award the contract. Alderman Carls moved to approve awarding the contract to J. W. Hanson Construction. Motion seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Schaefer stated he had been successful in negotiating two additional commitments for option of property for the West River Park project. He then reported on the conditions of the contracts for parcels 6 and 7. Out of 10 parcels in the project, there were seven property owners to date who have agreed to sell to the City, which was 64 per cent of the entire project. It was moved by Alderman Beatty to approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign contracts for parcels 6 and 7. Motion seconded by Ald- erman Gruenhagen and unanimously approved. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN TED BEATTY Alderman Beatty inquired about the status of the Bretzke garage property. He was informed by the City Administrator that the City's proposal of an agreement had been completed, and we were awaiting a response from the Li- brary Square Partnership. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MLINAR Alderman Mlinar pointed out that on page 3, Section 4 (k) of Ordinance No. 673, the filing fee had not been determined. It was the recommenda- tion of the City Attorney to set the filing fee at $25, which would be applied toward the cost of the appropriate license fee. In the event COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1983 the license was not awarded, the fee would not be refunded. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the filing fee of $25. Motion seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried, with the Chair abstaining from voting. An inquiry was made by Alderman Mlinar regarding subdivision agreements. He wondered if there could be uniformity to them. After discussion, the City Engineer was instructed to give the Council copies of those sub- divisions still in effect. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS Alderman Beatty moved to approve the payment of verified claims, from the appropriate funds. Motion seconded by Alderman Gruenhagen and carried] with the Chair abstaining from voting. 12. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:12 P.M. upon motion by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Carls and approved unanimously. -10- 0 0 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER THURSDAY, OCTOBER 13, 1983 PUBLICATION NO. 3164 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 25, 1983 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of City Hall for the purpose of: Consideration of the following Ordinance which has been proposed by a committee of electors and submitted by petition to the City Council: "The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 340.14 Subd. 5 authorizing issuance of special licenses permitting hotels, restaurants or clubs as defined by MSA 340.07 having facilities for serving not less than 30 guests at one time to serve intoxicating liquors between the hours of 12 o'clock noon and 12 o'clock midnight on Sundays in conjunction with the serving of food and the attendant regulatory provisions of Minnesota Statutes 340.14 Subd. 5 are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance as if fully set out herein." This hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson. At such hearing, all persons interested may be heard. A D. G�y D. P z City Clerk Dated: October 12, 1983 -// -a, I Published in the H hinson Leader on Tuesday, Oct *r 11th, 1983, and on Tuesday, October 1 , 1983• NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 84 -03 Publication No. 3150 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. on the 25th day of October, 1983, to consider the making of an improvement on Boulder Street from School Road to Roberts Road by construction of Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wear f„ourse and Appurtenances; and on Boulder Circle from Boulder Street to West Termini by the construction of Grading, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Wear Course and Appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the property benefited. The estimated cost of such improvement is $24,450.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. y6 � City Cl' k Dated: September 27th, 1983 PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS BEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. mil/ • �,,,r\o617181g2 2 p � Ss83 gjECdVED October 12, 1983 Mr. James DeMeyer, Mayor City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Mayor, The Hutchinson Rotary Club would like a permit or permission to set up and operate a temporary food stand on the day that is commonly called "Crazy Days" by the merchants association. This request is for 1 day and the location to be in the downtown library square area. Our purpose is to raise funds for our club projects, many of which benefit the City of Hutchinson. Our intention is to offer a pancake breakfast for the many shoppers that come out for the merchants promotion. If you would kindly favor us with a permit, please contact the writer or Mr. Vince Ross, our club president. If further information is needed, please call me at 587- 3797 days or 693 -7807 nights. Si�Y you Gary Ob rg, Clu Secretary Hutchinson Rotary Club 40 West Highland Park Hutchinson, MN 55350 ffW efy1FJSON 37 WASNIN6TON AVENUE WEST NUTCNINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: October 13th, 1983 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Engineering RE: MPWA Fall Conference Request permission to attend Minnesota Public Works Association Fall Conference in Brooklyn Park on November 17th and 18th. This is a budgeted conference. MVP /pv Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering 1, .t. i k t! - MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS OFFICIALS 59.18 MK FALL CONFERENCE Sheraton Inn Northwest November 16 -18, 1983 REGISTRATION FORM Brooklyn Park';' �,z3 Se ;t Name P R T P. S. P MIA R L O W 472 22 .585- 2 ; a (Last) , (First) - Social Security Number ( for CEUs) City d9c t7V1F' City of Hutchinson ? Work Address CitySHalt l 37 Washington Ave Wes Hutchinson. MN' 55350-, tree City State Z p Code) •'Work Phone (612) 587 - 5151 _ _'" Position ''birectoroof Fniinenrincr QS1 IX ,, 59 -188 I enclose S75 (check or money order payable to the University of-- Minnesota) in full payment of-the fee for the MPWA Fail Conference.,a4'r „i QS2 59 -18 I enclose 5125 in full payment of ttie fee for,Effective Management htu w� Techniques and the MPWA'Fall.Conference; ,y , L1 Enclosed is 5 (include. 515 for each additional guest ticket to the banquet Thursday evening; November:�7), ky name or guest$.. r My fee will be paid by`myzemployer•`,Enclosed'is a` ^Metter authorization and /on arpurchase -order number tp bill,for the',above amount,�i,J MAIL TO: Registrar, Department of Conferences,, University. of Minnesotai,,'2S3 Nolte Center, MM sl 315 Pillsbury Drive S,E , Minneapolis, MN 55455.0118 v d y '4r . y }.. �,W i ^.,, A 'C ,� ru k�., N ^ Jt-t 1 �' p ; •� ll l 4 v i jy ff ' i �. •j1 a.'1 1 ;i ,�1 5 t}i Fil�'y F 0 0 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gard D. Plotz, City Administrator — _ — _ _ — SUBJECT: Annual Planning—Institute — ------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — Attendance of the Annual Planning Institute Workshop in Owatonna on December 1, 1983 is requested. This is a budgeted item. Both Marlow Priebe and myself would like to attend. Attachment /ms F O R F U R T H E R Regarding Program Vicki Dettwiler Government Training Service 202 Minnesota Building 46 East Fourth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/222 -7409 or Minnesota toll free 800/652 -9719 I N F O R M A T I O N Regarding Real Estate Education Credit Information Only Thomas Musil Director of Real Estate Education University of Minnesota 337 Nolte Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 612/376 -8846 REGISTRATION FORM Land Use Planning Workshops Annual Planning Institutes Nacre Gary D. Plotz Organization/ Jurisdiction /Firm City of Hutchinson Title City Administrator Phone (612 ) 587 -5151 Business Address 37 Washington Avenue West City /State /Zip Hutchinson, MN 55350 Enclosed is the $25 registration fee (make checks, vouchers, or purchase orders payable to the Government Training Service) for the following: (check one) LAND USE PLANNING WORKSHOPS ANNUAL PLANNING INSTITUTES ❑ November 5th -- Chisholm ❑ November 16th -- Detroit Lakes ❑ December 1st -- Owatonna ❑ December 9th -- Owatonna ❑ November 5th -- Chisholm ❑ November 16th -- Detroit Lakes 19 December 1st -- Owatonna ❑ December 9th -- Owatonna ❑ Please send me further information regarding overnight accommodations. Return this form to: Government Training Service, 202 Minnesota Building, 46 East Fourth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101 at least one week prior to the workshop date. 5 - LAND USE PLANNING WORKSHOPS FOR COMMUNITY DECISION MAKERS AND REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS © Sponsored By: My Minnesota Planning Association Real Estate Education Program Department of Conferences ,. Continuing Education and Extension r. University of Minnesota Ln, - _ in cooperation with Government Training Service FOUR DATES — FOUR LOCATIONS NOVEMBER 5, CHISHOLM DECEMBER 1, OWATONNA NOVEMBER 16, DETROIT LAKES DECEMBER 9, TWIN CITIES ANNUAL PLANNING INSTITUTE FOR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS AND ELECTED OFFICIALS Sponsored By: j Government Training Service ('�� • i , t • RESOLUTION NO. 7548 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITY FROM FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the First State Federal Savings & Loan Association of Hutchinson, a duly designated depository of the City, has pledged the following security: GNMA - Pool 4168345 GNMA - Pool #62473 GNMA - Pool 110007 FHLMC - Group 1118 -3926 Due 5 -15 -98 Due $2,012 at 12% Due $2,013 at 12% Due $2,007 at 8.25% $ 507,702.00 290,930.54 323,039.75 317,545.54 $1,439,217.83 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the City Treasurer is hereby authorized to accept said pledged security being held at Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of October, 1983. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk James G. DeMeyer Mayor 6 -a. RESOLUTION NO. 7553 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR 20 - 3/4" x 8" x 7' Curved 5D9559 $ 66.73 ea. Street Yes Ziegler Inc. 100 - Nuts & Bolts (Gr.8 ) 48.00 100 Extra Blades for 2 - 1/2 "x6 "x5' Double Front End Loader Bevel Curved 24.16 ea. and Grader 1 - 3/4 "x10 "x8'8" Flat Center Punch 157.43 ea. 3 - 3/4 "x8 "x7' Flat 64.65 3 - 3/4 "x8 "x6' Flat 55.55 ea. The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM Date Approved: Motion made by: Seconded by: COST PURPOSE I DEPT. IBUDGET I VENDOR Resolution submitted for Council action by: � --:, 0 d F 0 ii£i,S, the Aid Assnriatian of £nthrrans has prnuidrd funding fnr the fnllaming Titg park prajerta: fandsraping at £hirm Park £xrrrise Trail at RnbPrls Park Plaggrnnnd £quipmrnt at t?nrth ':lark ?VOID TH£it£3Oii£, BE 3T RE50fTED BV TH£ T36P T( UNC3i Oy T:£ T3TUT d3 fll3NNTSOTA: T�1i+T dPPp apprPriatinn is hrrrhg rxprrssed to said Aid Yssnrinfinn of iuthrrans fnr their afnrrmrntinnrd rnntributinns, and thr gratitude of llulzhinsnn and the riti=rns fhrrrnf is hPrrhg rxprrssrd. AdnptPd bg thr Titg Tnunril this 25th dag of (9rtnhrr, 1483. 3ames l5. i�PPiPger SEPT. 16 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAAPORT - 1983 SEPT. REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND SEPT. YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 451329.15 947331.00 496001.85 0.48 LICENSES 1022.00 14803.06 16400.00 1596.94 0.90 PERMITS AND FEES 9609.80 49140.29 36700.00 - 12440.29 1.34 INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE 204978.53 598418.59 988115.00 389696.41 0.61 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 32534.36 188092.69 283138.00 95045.31 0.66 FINES & FORFEITS 2247.96 15826.54 30000.00 14173.46 0.53 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9832.09 137710.74 185300.00 47589.26 0.74 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 62500.00 210074.50 373000.00 162925.50 0.56 REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES 756.79 2853.17 200.00 - 2653.17 14.27 TOTAL 323481.53 1668248.73 2860184.00 1191935.27 0.58 EXPENSE REPORT GENERAL FUND MAYOR & COUNCIL 2733.64 24522.04 32157.00 7634.96 0.76 CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK 11575.74 80945.52 104249.00 23303.48 0.78 ELECTIONS 0.00 75.75 6300.00 6224.25 0.01 FINANCE 13789.16 120371.12 154829.00 34457.88 0.78 MOTOR VEHICLE 6332.62 45303.86 56019.00 10715.14 0.81 ASSESSING 0.00 9081.80 18164.00 9082.20 0.50 LEGAL 1893.86 23557.81 29631.00 6073.19 0.80 PLANNING 0.00 2072.10 3375.00 1302.90 0.61 CITY HALL 3486.57 28430.12 42492.00 14061.88 0.67 OLD ARMORY 274.98 11093.20 25112.00 14018.80 0.44 POLICE DEPARTMENT 62978.12 436000.84 567555.00 131554.16 0.77 FIRE DEPARTMENT 7196.51 45876.12 73355.00 27478.88 0.63 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER 3457.54 23303.47 30376.00 7072.53 0.77 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 4533.93 31634.50 42375.00 10740.50 0.75 CIVIL DEFENSE 38.50 435.89 475.00 39.11 0.92 SAFETY COUNCIL 0.00 150.00 150.00 0.00 1.00 FIRE MARSHALL 3568.68 25400.48 34950.00 9549.52 0.73 ENGINEERING 16199.44 113287.26 146010.00 32722.74 0.78 STREETS & ALLEYS 22972.51 209826.44 307882.00 98055.56 0.68 STREET MAINTENANCE A/C 5801.51 51695.00 65725.00 14030.00 0.79 LIBRARY 11808.01 38062.79 56285.00 18222.21 0.68 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 1932.75 26522.38 14357.00 - 12165.38 1.85 PARK /REC. ADMIN. 5842.72 43981.65 58893.00 14911.35 0.75 RECREATION 6318.72 61803.40 68185.00 6381.60 0.91 CIVIC ARENA 6793.25 65840.69 99056.00 33215.31 0.66 PARK DEPARTMENT 24226.00 222415.92 274539.00 52123.08 0.81 CEMETERY 5091.37 28758.84 38499.00 9740.16 0.75 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 361.60 4507.14 6400.00 1892.86 0.70 LAWCON 637.70 5724.99 114055.00 108330.01 0.05 DEBT SERVICE 2235.22 97127.76 104558.00 7430.24 0.93 AIRPORT 1354.24 38364.40 50625.00 12260.60 0.76 TRANSIT 4540.98 45531.19 70712.00 25180.81 0.64 UNALLOCATED 248.06 158569.99 162839.00 4269.01 0.97 TOTAL 238223.93 2120274.47 2860184.00 739909.53 0.74 EXPENSE REPORT LIQUOR FUND PERSONEL SERVICES 14212.78 93042.56 117918.00 24875.44 SEPT. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1983 SEPT. 2143.53 ENTERPRISE FUNDS OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 1296.81 10082.36 REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND SEPT. YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE USED 529.00 ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING CAPITAL OUTLAY LIQUOR SALES 31966.58 277325.69 476100.00 198774.31 0.58 0.61 WINE SALES 7657.53 73941.09 121900.00 47958.91 105518.69 0.81 BEER SALES 49989.31 446481.31 552000.00 614285.12 883450.00 BEER DEPOSITS - 118.48 - 1795.40 0.00 1795.40 0.00 MISC. SALES 1770.69 14946.70 0.00 - 14946.70 109063.16 CASH DISCOUNTS - 254.42 - 2159.21 0.00 2159.21 TOTAL TOTAL 91011.21 808740.18 1150000.00 341259.82 0.70 EXPENSE REPORT LIQUOR FUND PERSONEL SERVICES 14212.78 93042.56 117918.00 24875.44 0.79 SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 17.20 1956.47 4100.00 2143.53 0.48 0.35 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 1296.81 10082.36 28550.00 18467.64 0.08 MISCELLANEOUS 15.00 529.00 6650.00 6121.00 0.00 CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 7157.79 0.00 - 7157.79 5110.00 0.00 DEBT SERVICE 0.00 20000.00 0.00 60000.00 5110.00 110000.00 50000.00 0.55 TRANSFERS COST OF SALES 73521.37 614285.12 883450.00 269164.88 0.70 OTHER 0.00 0.00 11487.00 11487.00 0.00 TOTAL 109063.16 787053.30 1167265.00 380211.70 0.67 REVENUE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND FEDERAL GRANTS 748.00 25957.00 0.00 - 25957.00 109582.58 0.00 0.74 WATER SALES 44724.82 316217.42 425800.00 0.80 WATER METER SALES 741.00 19890.96 3979.55 164720.24 5000.00 230000.00 1020.45 65279.76 0.72 REFUSE SERVICES SEWER SERVICES 48329.82 390151.66 507500.00 117348.34 0.77 PENALTY CHARGES 481.92 4810.56 0.00 - 4810.56 0.00 INTEREST EARNED 2248.26 33542.17 55000.00 21457.83 0.61 REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 959.00 0.00 - 959.00 0.00 OTHER 160.00 993.12 4000.00 3006.88 0.25 TOTAL 117324.78 941330.72 1227300.00 285969.28 0.77 EXPENSE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND OPERATIONS 158612.09 699342.74 1043253.00 343910.26 0.67 WATER 7008.48 625613.18 123206.00 - 502407.18 5.08 SEWER 15291.99 140589.57 167318.00 26728.43 0.84 TOTAL 180912.56 1465545.49 1333777.00 - 131768.49 1.10 0 0 October 13, 1983 The library board met on October 13, 1983, with the following members present: Ralph Bergstrom, Paul Ackland, Kathy McGraw, Albert Linde, Gena Iverson, Sally Cone. The minutes of the previous meeting were read and approved. The purpose of the meeting was to bring the board up -to -date on progress of the campaign to promote the library referendum. The League of Women Voters have invited the board to present the referendum information at a candidates meeting on Oct. 24 at 8:00 p.m. A sheet for names of supporters of the referendum was passed out to be used in a newspaper ad. Brochures with voting information have been prepared. A meeting to address them will be held on Monday evening, Gct. 17. The meeting was adjourned. f Secretary MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 20, 1983 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Larry Romo at 7:30 P.M., with the following members present: Ted Beatty, Don Erickson, Shu -Mei Hwang, Thomas Lyke, Roland Ebent and Chairman Romo. Members absent: Elsa Young. Also present: City Engineer Marlow V. Priebe, City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Fire Marshal George Field and City Attorney James Schaefer. 2. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting dated August 16, 1983, were approved as presented upon motion by Mr. Erickson. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATTING OF SHADY RIDGE ESTATES AS SUBMITTED BY LYNDON GERNAND Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of Publication #3126 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 8, 1983. The request is for approval of the platting of Shady Ridge Estates, which is the replatting of Lots 5 and 6, Block 2, Rolling Oaks Fourth Addition. City Engineer Priebe explained the request. The replatting is necessary as the property owners will become part of an association. Association papers have been submitted. After discussion, Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing at 7:34 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Beatty, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Beatty made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY RAYMOND STRASMANN Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of Publication #3131 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 8, 1983. The request is for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 14' by 20' addition to an existing, non - conforming garage on the property located at 760 Spruce Street. Mr. Strasmann was present to explain the request. It was noted that the addition meets all required setbacks. / "( w Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 20, 1983 Page 2 Mr. Beatty made a motion to close the hearing at 7:38 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. [bent made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit to allow the 14' by 20' addition to the existing garage on the property located at 760 Spruce Street. Seconded by Mr. Beatty, the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR PLATTING ROLLING OAKS FIFTH ADDITION AS SUBMITTED BY GARY MILLER Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of publication #3136 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 8, 1983. The request is for the preliminary and final platting of Rolling Oaks Fifth Addition, a replatting of Lot 12, Block 2, Rolling Oaks Fourth Addition. Originally, this lot was part of a PUD that consisted of a several unit condominium -type building. As time has shown better chance of marketing for twin homes, the lot has been replatted for 5 lots on which twin homes would be built. City Engineer Priebe explained the request. Mr. Miller was present to answer any questions. After discussion, Mr. Beatty made a motion to close the hearing at 7:45 F Seconded by Mr. Ebent, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Beatty made motion to recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat as presented. Seconded by Mr. Ebent, the motion carried unanimousl) (d) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR VACATION OF THE EASEMENT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 10 AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 11, BLOCK 2, ROLLING OAKS FOURTH ADDITION AS SUBMITTED BY GARY MILLER Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of publication #3137 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 8, 1983. City Engineer Priebe and Gary Miller were present to explain the request, which will allow the lot line between lots 10 and 11 to be moved. After the lot line is moved and a survey made, a new 6' easement will be determined. Mr. Priebe explained that the new easement had already been drawn up. After discussion, Mr. Beatty made a motion to close the hearing at 7:47 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Beatty made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the vacation of easement as requested, with the contingency that the new 6' easement be made. Seconded by Ebent, the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4 -UNIT CONDOMINIUM SUBMITTED BY JEFF HAAG Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of Publication #3135 as pushed in the Hutchinson Leade* Thursday, September 8, 1983. i • Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 20, 1983 Page 3 Mr. Jeff Haag was present to explain the request which will allow the construction of a 4 -unit condominium in an R -2 Zone on the property located at 860 Dale Street. After discussion, it was the consensus of the staff and planning commission that a PUD is not necessary because there is only one structure proposed; however, Mr. Haag was directed to review the proposal with Mr. Priebe and answer any questions usually required for a PUD that pertain to his proposal. Mr. Jim DuHamel was present to ask about how much fill might be put in and if-it would cause a drainage problem for his property located south of the proposed site. Mr. Priebe explained that that area was being watched for drainage problems. Mr. Haag explained that he didn't expect to add much fill. As the area is developed, it will be served by the southwest storm sewer. Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing at 8:05 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Beatty the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Beatty 'made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as requested provided that Association papers are submitted to City Council and that Mr. Haag and Mr. Priebe review the points of PUD papers that pertain to Mr. Haag's proposal. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF THE REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY LITTLE LAMBS PRESCHOOL Chairman Romo opened the hearing with the reading of Publication #3138 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 8, 1983. The request is for a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a preschool on the property located at 4th and Glen Streets (Peace Lutheran Church Education Building). Mr. Paul Berg was present to answer any questions about the proposed preschool. It was.noted that the building meets all code requirements at this time. Mr. Beatty made a motion to close the hearing at 8:07 P.M. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City - Council approval of the conditional use permit as requested by Little Lambs Preschool. Seconded by Mr. Beatty, the motion carried unanimously. 4. Old Business (a) PLATTING AND COUNTY ZONING SUBDIVISION ZONING ADMINISTRAT R G City Engineer Priebe was present to explain the request which was referred to the City for approval as the property is within two -miles of the City. The plat consists of two lots which face South Grade Planning Commission Minutes Tuesday, September 20, 1983 Page 4 Road. Rezoning will be from agricultural to rural residential to allow the development of single- family, non -farm dwellings. Mr. Priebe noted that both requests (platting and rezoning), conform to the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Beatty made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the requests for platting and rezoning and that the recommendation be passed on to the County Zoning Administrator. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (b) REVIEW OF NEW WORDING PROPOSED FOR ZONING ORDINANCE (DOG KENNEL) Following a complaint about dogs being bred as a business at a local residence, City Attorney Schaefer composed a definition for the word "kennel" to be part of and an amendment to Zoning Ordinance 464. After discussion, it was the consensus of the commission that the definition of "kennel" should be stated as follows: "KENNEL: Any premises used by a person, firm, partnership or corporation engaged in the business of breeding, buying, selling or boarding dogs." Mr. Beatty made a motion to authorize City staff to set a public hearing to consider amending Zoning Ordinance 464 to include the above listed definition of the word kennel. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. 5. New Business (a) REVIEW OF PROPOSED REZONING BY GORDON HEDLUND City Engineer presented a letter he received from Mr. Hedlund explaining his proposal to extend the mobil home park. The land he proposes to buy is presently zoned R -3. It would have to be rezoned R -5 to continue as a mobil home park. Mr. Priebe :explained that the rezoning Would just be an_eytension of tract :already zoned R 75. It was the consensus of the planning commission that Mr. Hedlund should pursue the rezoning if he so desires. Mr. Priebe will notify Mr. Hedlund of the recommendation. 6. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 P.M. (� on a motion by Mr. Beatty. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried V unanimously. !" 12) 587 -5151 CITY OF NuTcr-HAISON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350 M E M 0 DATE: October 12th, 1983 TO: City Attorney FROM: Director of Engineering RE: Cedar Acres Attached is a copy of the Subdivision Agreement for the above - referenced plat. MVP /pv attac ment cc: City Council s Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering 9— /. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth here- _ inafter by and between Richard Schmidtbauer and Noell Investment, hereinafter called the "Subdivider," and the City of Hutchinson, a municipal corporation in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a certain subdivison known as Cedar Acres, which is located in Tot 17 of Auditors plat_ of Section 7- 116-29 to the City of Hutchinson and - WHEREAS, Ordinances 235 and 328 'require subdividers to make certain - =- improvements and the parties are desirous of entering into an agreement with respect to such improvements which are set forth, togeather with the estimate-. cost thereof. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLIOWS: 1. The _Subdivider hereby petitions the City to construct Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Base, Curb, and Gutter and Bituminous Surfacing for the entire plat. 2. The Subdivider shall grade all Streets to Subgrade, the full width of the right of way prior to the construction_ of utilities. 3. That the City shall construct the petition items pursuant to the regular method of making public improvements; that E special- assessments may be levied therefor, in which event, they shall be payable within 'a five (5) year period. That the Subdivider shall deposit with the City a cash escrow'in the amount of 10% of the total cost of the public improvements, which have been estimated by the City Engineer to be in the amount of $16,400.00 for the Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer to be constructed in 1970• Such deposit shall be applied'' by the City to payment of the improvements for the Subdivision. Such Cash Escrow Deposit shall be made within fifteen (15) days after receiving notice from the City of Hutchinson that a con--' tract has been let for said installations. The Subdivider shall pay to the City interest in the amount of seven (7) percent ` per annum on tho unpaid balance owing for said improvements. Said interest to commence 15 days after receiving notice frog - the City that a contract has been let for said improvements ; y and on said interest would be payable one (1) year thereafter --,� from the, date thereafter from the date thereof. 4. It is understood and agreed that the amounts set forth in this Agreement are estimated, that the Subdivider ahall pay the entire cost for all the improvements, that all sums shall be paid within a five (5) year period from date of notification from the City of Hutchinson, and that a contract has been let for the improvements. 5. It is understood and agreed that the public improvements may be let under several contracts and a separate notice, cash escrow and five (5) year period of payment will be required for each contract. -1- _. 4 6. The total cost of the public-improvements has been estimated by the City Engineer to be in the amount of $51,700.00 for Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Curb, and Gutter; Bituminous Base, and Surfacing. 7. It is understood and agreed that subsequent to receiving notice or notices from the City that a contract or contracts have been let for the public improvements, the Subdivider shall within fifteen (15) days, deposit with the City cash equal to 125% of the total estimated assessment'for each lot that has been sold and thereafter deposit with the City cash equal to 125% of the total estimated assessment for each lot at such time as each remaining lot is sold; that such deposits shall be made until such'time as the total cost of the improvements is on deposit. In the event the " total cost is not on deposit within the five year period from date of each notice, the Subdivider shall deposit the balance due within i fifteen (15) days after receiving notice from the City of the amount due. 8. In the event that the Subdivider, his heirs, successors or assigns, violate any of the covenants and agreements herein contained, the City is hereby ganted the right and privilege to declare the , entire sum covered by this agreement due and payable in full with the real estate taxes due and payable in the year following the breach of any provision of the Agreement and the City may immediately bring legal action against the Subdivider to collect the sums covered by this Agreement; the Subdivider shall be personally responsible for the payment of the sums set forth in this Agreement, including special assessments. 9. Subdivider agrees to pay to the City reasonable` attorney's fees, to be fixed by the Court, in the event that suit or action is brought to enforce the terms of this agreement, it being understood that before any suit or action is commenced, the City shall give the Subdivider thirty (30) days prior written notice during which time- said Subdivider shall have the opportunity to correct or pay up to date any payments which may be in default.herein. - 10. The improvements as described in paragraph one to be constructed by the City, shall be made under a contract let by the City and it constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer and approved by the City Council. 11. It is hereby agreed that the Subdivider say install by contract any public improvements, at his expense, provided he has plans and' _ - specifications approved by the City Engineer. 12 It is hereby agreed that payment of 861600.00 to the City meets requirements for the contribution to the Parks. and Playgrounds. 13. It is understood and agreed that the Sanitary Sewer, Waterman, Storm Sewer, and Street Improvements completed, to date, by the City will be assessed to the property. 14. This Agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. - -2- 0 IN WITIF_SS *,HEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this 27th day of October , 1971• IN THE PRESENCE OF: BY r i 't ✓1ts�.L'Z2c t/ ,.' im - • • CITIY��L�Tr T :RuJCST COO October 25, 1983 Mr. Patrick Smith Cameo Cleaners 2nd Avenue SE and Hassan St. So. Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Dear Mr. Smith: This letter will serve as our commitment to provide the funds necessary to purchase the building located at 37 North Main Street, according to the terms of the purchase agreement dated October 17, 1983. This commitment is predicated upon you providing the funds necessary for relocation of the physical plant. Sincerely yours, Connee Thomas F. ll Sr. Vice President TFO /cml OFFICES: 102 MAIN ST. SO. • HIGHWAY 15 SO. • HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 • PHONE: 612, 587 -2233 1 f - Ail l'r'L -Oni,e Cops' V VURCHASE AGREEME ' P K —Seller 'syCopy Copy October 1.7...._..........._19$3..... Hutchins an..........._ rzi„n., .._ _ ._.. _......._... . RECEIVED OF Patric k Smith and Rachel..Smith.s...husbandandwife., ....................... r t .,. ... .. .............. . . ..- .- ($.1.00 00....) DOLLARS the sum of One'.3uF� -reed and no %100 ,..._... .,., -- .... check .................................. ........................... :.as earnest money and in part payment for the purchase of property at (Cheek, Cash or Nate —State which) - 3.Z..N.....MainHutchinson ........... ........................situated in the .r... ............................................... ............ County of......... MCL!:A .................... State of Irlmesom, and legally described as follows, to -wit: The North one -third (1/3) of Lot Nine (9), Block Forty -nine (49), North one -half (2), City of Hutchinson. including all garden bulbs, plants, shrubs and trees, all storm sash, storm doors, detachable vestibules, screens, awnings, window shades, blinds (including venetian blinds), curtain rods, traverse rods, drapery rods, lighting fixtures and bulbs, plumbing fixtures, hot water tanks and heating plant (with any burners, tanks, stokers and other equipment used in connection there- with), water softener and liquid gas tank and controls (if the property of seller), sump pump, television antenna, inciner- ator, built -in dishwasher, garbage disposal, ovens, cook top stoves and central air conditioning equipment, if any, used and located on said premises and including also the following personal property: all of which property the undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of: Fifty thous.and..and..no.( 100- ....... -. -.- ...... ........ DOLLARS, which the buyer agrees to pay in the following manner: 15 1984 Earnest money herein paid $!100. 00, .. and $- 9..,80.0.•.00 , cash, on or-before . Jan_......, rite date of closing. The remaining balance of $40,000.00 shall be payable in monthly contract for deed installments of $506.71, which amount includes interest thereon at 9% per annum. The first installment shall be due and payable February 1, 1984 with a like amount due and payable on the first day of each month thereafter until February 1, 1994, at which time any remaining principal balance including interest thereon is due in lump sum. Interest shall commence January 1, 1984. Buyers agree to assume and pay when due an existing parking assessment. This agreement is contingent upon buyers obtaining the following (cont. at * on attached) Subject to performance by the buyer the seller agrees to execute and deliver a .__. ...... ............. — Warranty Deed (to be joined in by spouse, if any) conveying marketable ride to said premises subject only to the following exceptions: (a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations. (b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of premises without effective forfeiture provision. (c) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota. (d) Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements. (e) Rights of tenants as follows: (unless specified, not subject to eppancies) The buyer shall pay the real estate taxes due in the year 194 d any unpaid installments of special assessents payable therewith and thereafter. Seller warrants that real estate taxes due in the year 19 0-2 -. will be non- classification ( full, partial or non - homestead — state which) Neither the seller nor the seller's agent make any representation or warranty whatsoever concerning the amount of real estate taxes which shall be assessed against the property subsequent to the date of purchase. Seller covenants that buildings, if any, are entirely within the boundary lines of the property and agrees to remove all personal property not included herein and all debris from the premises prior to possession date. SELLER WARRANTS ALL APPLIANCES, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING, WIRING AND PLUMBING USED AND LOCATED ON SAID PREMISES ARE IN PROPER WORKING ORDER AT DATE OF CLOSING. The seller further agrees to deliver possession not later than January. .1.,._.1986.... provided that all conditions of this agreement have been complied with. Unless otherwise specified this sale shall be closed on or before 60 days from the date hereof. In the event this property is destroyed or substantially damaged by fire or any other muse before the dosing date, this agreement shall become null and void, at the purchasers option, and all monies paid hereunder shall be refunded to him. The buyer and seller also mutually agree that pro rata adjustments of rents, f crest iRsµrgnce and city water, and, in the case of income property, current operating expenses, shall be made as of ......_. J. anuary_. 1.,... �70. 4 ..............___.... ....__....__.............____.. The seller shall, within a reasonable time after approval of this agreement, furnish an abstract of title, or a Registered Property Abstract certified to dare to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, and State and Federal judgments and liens. The buyer shall be allowed 10 days after receipt thereof for examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto, said objections to be made in writing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are so made the seller shall be allowed 120 days to make such title marketable. Pending correction of tide the payments hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within 10 days after written notim to the buyer, the parties shall perform this agreement according to its terms. If said title is not marketable and is not made so within 120 days from the dam of written objections thereto as above provided, this agreement shall be null and void, at option of the buyer, and neither principal shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other principal. All money theretofore paid by the buyer shall be refunded. If the tide to said property be found marketable or be so made within said time, and said buyer shall default in any of the agreements and continue in default for a period of 10 days, then and in that case the seller may terminate this contract and on such termination all the payments made upon this contract shall be retained by said seller and said agent, as their respective interests may appear, as liquidated damages, time being of the essence hereof. This provision shall not deprive either parry of the right of enforcing the specific performance of this contract provided such contract shall not be terminated as aforesaid, and provided action to enforce such specific performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise. It is understood and agreed that this sale is made subject to the approval by the owner of said premises in writing and that the under- signed agent is in no manner liable or responsible on account of this acreement, except to return or account for the earnest money paid under this contract. The delivery of all papers and monies shall be made ac the office of: 1, the undersigned, owner of the above land, do hereby approve the above agreement and the sale thereby trade. ................... Melon e1<ter.- lsytr. Lla Glen 'I'I!IS IS A f By............ ............................... 1 hereby agree ro purchase upon the ,ter sIbove emit herein exprcC7!CP r C for the price and to all condition LLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD, SRfiK COMPETENT .ADVICE. ,10- 0 three items: 0 (a) A $10,000.00 operating, relocation and installation loan from a lending institution; (b) Relocation expenses from the City of Hutchinson in the amount of $5,000.00; (c) extension to January existing lease with the City of In the event one or all of contingencies are not met, all funds paid by buyer to seller shall be refunded and this agreement shall become null and void. 2) 587 -5151 ' ECn Y OF mul ec'rr!'LIS01V 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: October 17th, 1983 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Engineering RE: Hilltop Addition Project 84 -01 The previous hearing held for this project for the area North of Hilltop Addition was proper and I recommend approval of same. The cost report for that portion was $36,400.00. The Hilltop Addition area cost report was $26,000.00. According to the Subdivision Agreement and the Subdivision Ordinance, the total cost shall be paid by the property owners. I recommend that the City notify said property owners that if they desire to have their street improved, they submit a signed petition with each property owners share of the cost. If they cannot agree on same, the street remains gravel and the maintenance assessment is made. They have been notified of same and would be removed if the project proceeds. Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering MVP/PV RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 84 -01 Resolution No. 7519 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted August 23rd, 1983, a report has been prepared by Marlow V. Priebe with reference to the improvement of Hilltop Lane and Connecticut Street in Hilltop Addition and Connecticut Street and Campbell Lane in Clark's 2nd addition and McClure's Addition by the construction of Gravel Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances, and this report was received by the council on August 23rd, 1983. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: t. The council will consider the improvement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $62,400.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 25th day of October, 1983, in the council chambers of the city hall at 8:00 P.M. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Clerk Adopted by the council this 11th day of .October, 1983. Mayor (612) 879 -231 1 r CITY OF HUT C04INSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 25, 1983_ TO: — — Mayor & City Council — — — _ — — — — — — — FROM: — — Water Billing_Dept _ — — — — — — — — — — — SUBJECT: — — Delinquent water Accounts — — _ _ — — — — — Attached is a listing of the delinquent water accounts for the month of October. Recommend water service be discontinued on October 31, 1983 at 12:00 Noon unless otherwise stated. *Service Address 9 -Q. 605 Main St. S. 26 Grp St�S. - Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutch son MN 55350 *605 Main St. S. *26 Grove St. $78.19 $82.97 02- 0370 -5 -00 10- 1195 -6 -00 Jerry Eischens Gary Degn 831 Hennepin Ave. 616 Grove St. S. Glencoe, MN 55336 Hutchinson, MN 55350 *756 Ivy Lane *616 Grove St. S. $11.91 $48.46 cc: Harold Elder cc: Luann Sing 02- 0560 -2 -00 07- 0075 -2 -00 02- 0215 -0 -00 Steve Rowley Mrs. Hazel Reynolds 616 Franklin St. S. 441 Main St. S. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutchinson, MN 55350 *616 Franklin St. S. *441 Main St. S. $84.00 $72.51 cc: Wm. James 02- 0280 -1 -00 p 8- 0840 -1 -00 Alton Wicklund C arles Pearson 605 Main St. S. 26 Grp St�S. - Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutch son MN 55350 *605 Main St. S. *26 Grove St. $78.19 $82.97 02- 0370 -5 -00 10- 1195 -6 -00 Jerry Eischens Gary Degn 831 Hennepin Ave. 616 Grove St. S. Glencoe, MN 55336 Hutchinson, MN 55350 *756 Ivy Lane *616 Grove St. S. $11.91 $48.46 cc: Harold Elder cc: Luann Sing 02- 0560 -2 -00 11- 0100 -5 -00 Robert Hatten Larry Hillman Route 2 322 Water St. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutchinson, MN 55350 *436 Hassan St. *322 Water St. $28.04 $14.50 cc: Todd Schnobrich cc: Ford Rolfe Promises to pay 11/01 04- 0625 -2 -00 Richard Sturges 35- 0194 -0 -00 425 Third Ave. S.E. Gary Miller Hutchinson, MN 55350 1290 Rolling Oaks Lane *425 Third Ave. S.E. Hutchinson, MN 55350 $34.79 *1286 Rolling Oaks Lane $15.90 04- 1105 -3 -00 Janice Ahles Silver Lake, MN 55381 *646 Second Ave. SE $41.09 cc: Victoria Weishert 05- 0180 -0 -00 Christy's 18 Main St. N. Hutchinson, MN 55350 *18 Main St. N. $122.30 Promises to pay $50.00 11/04, $72.30 11/10 is 0 k� 6tate of Ninne�ota, City utchinson Y......._......... _of......_._...._ ............ .......... ........_.............. County o f ........ McLeod .. ..... .............._.._..._._.. ........ ..._ _ ..... .4ppUcation No Application for License to Sell Cigarettes at Retail ............._..._........._o Hutchinson .........- ........__, The undersigned resident__.. of the. ........ ..__._.._ ... --city. ......._. f__.......... in the count o McLeod ........................... State of Minnesota, HEREBY 17.4KE__.. IPPLIC.4- T70.1" FOR LICENSE to be issued to........... Allan _..._..........._ . E. ......... Ot......r_....e...mba ..... ............................ ............................. .. ...................................... _ to sett cigarettes and cigarette papers and wrappers at retail at .... Scalawags Hwy. 7 West ........................_........................._........................ ...........__.._......._._.._.. _ __... in the- __.. ...._...City_............. ......... .... .o f.._....... Hutchinson ._ ........ .........__.._.in said county and state for the term, of .. ............ . 3 Months be rnnin with the 2..th day o October gi g y f . _._... 19.83. _, subject to the laws of the State of .Vinnesota and the ordinances and regulations of said City o Hutchinson pertaining thereto, and herewith deposit ............................ f._...................... - ... .- _......... $ 5.00 __,.._......._in payment of the fee therefor. ... _ .... ............. Dated...... October _ 17 ......................_......, 19...83... ......__..... .... _ .............. Im (612) 587 -5151 /'HUTC�r�' CITY Y O 6: U CI.111JS0iv r' 37 WA SHING TON A VENUE WES T HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning as submitted Py Gordon 0. Hedlund Pursuant to Section 6.06, CA, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HTSTnRY On September 23, 1983, a request was submitted by Mr. Gordon Hedlund to rezone the following property located at California Street from R -3, Multiple Family Residence zone, to R -5, Mobile Home Park Zone. Legal Description: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, HELLAND'S FIRST ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly, along the south line of said Lot 10 a distance of 150.02 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence northerly, parallel with the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 300.48 feet; thence easterly, deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes a distance of 1020.59 feet to the intersection with the northerly extension of the east line of Tract A of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 15; thence southerly, along said northerly extension, a distance of 27.00 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract A: thence westerly, southerly, and westerly, along the southerly line of said Lot 1, to the point of beginning. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 189 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was filed and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983• 3. Staff felt that this request for rezoning is appropriate because it adjoins property already zoned R -5. q& I, z f (N.1 NU ( J 5.33: F Ll 'i 'CC. 4ENDA'i TO�7 It i. the roc olamenda..ir, th= ni)lr 'I ;c, -, that the aforementioned area'be rezon:ad fro_, B -3 y submitted, - L)e! "t, Vice - Chairman I ii;c+"-_on Flanning Commission H w ra+: 4 1 f Y ` CALOG5NIA SiREEr 7 _ -- , b ORDINANCE NO. 21/83 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 464 CONCERNING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING M,&P THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -3 Multiple Family Residence District to R -5 Mobile Home Park. That part of Lot 1, Block 2, Helland's First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly, along the south line of said Lot 1, a distance of 150.02 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence northerly, parallel with the west line of said Lot 1, a distance of 300.48 feet; thence easterly, deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes a distance of 1020.59 feet to the inter- section with the northerly extension of the east line of Tract A of Reg- istered Land Survey No. 15; thence southerly, along said northerly exten- sion, a distance of 27.00 feet to the northeast corner of said Tract A: thence westerly, southerly, and westerly, along the southerly line of said Lot 1, to the point of beginning. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of November, 1983. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk James G. DeMeyer Mayor (612) B79-2311 CITY OF NuYCI411PLIS N 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FROM: Planning Commission _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit -Submitted by Slyter Builders for Kenneth Baumann Pursuant to Section 6.07, C.5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. uTCTnov On September 21, 1983, an application was submitted by Slyter Builders for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of an 18' by 24' addition to an existing- nonconforming garage, on the property located at 115 5th Ave. N. W. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 18, 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. 4. This request also.requires a variance. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the conditional use permit be granted. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice- Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission �� DESCRIPTION is Half of Lot 2, Block 7, alf of the City of Hutch- except that part thereof ed as follows; ng at a point on the east said Lot 2 a distance of "eet north of the southeast 3f said lot; thence west - a right angle to said east 3istance of 4.00 feet; iortherly, parallel with 5t line, a distance of a_et; thence easterly at angle to said east line ance of 4.00 feet to said '-ne; thence southerly, along -st line, a distance of :feet to the point of beginning. am OI N to N i .....7 7.30 -- i 47 m r - 24 -- �PROPOSED� ,ADDITION 24 EXISTING m N GARAGE 24 I Co 17.5 0 J m 10.7 v EXISTING a HOUSE NO. 115 36.5 —74.00-- R=5064.74 c O O I EXI STING N GARAGE concrete apron O CWseled X 7n cone O tF _ t0 BF DECKI O 4IFTH AVAE NORTHWEST i RESOLUTION NO. 7549 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07, C.5 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING, NON - CONFORMING GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: F T NT) T NCS 1. Slyter Builders of Hutchinson, on behalf of Kenneth Bauman, has made ap- plication to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the construction of an 18' x 24' addition to an existing, non - conforming garage on property located at 115 Fifth Avenue North- west, with a legal description of: East half of Lot 2, Block 7, North half of the City of Hutchinson, except that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2 a distance of 106.80 feet north of the southeast corner of said lot; thence westerly at a right angle to said east line a distance of 4.00; thence northerly, parallel with said east line, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence easterly at a right angle to said east line a distance of 4.00 feet to said east line; thence southerly, along said east line, a distance of 26.00 feet to the beginning. 2. The .City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Com- mission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic condi- tions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the ef- fect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate sur- rounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. PnNCT.T1 S T nw The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above.- Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of October, 1983. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk James G. DeMeyer, Mayor 'rte (612) 879 -2.411 yUr�Jr U11 Y OF NU) e1o.PL'S0iV 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST 'G `V HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 18, 1983 T0: Hutchinson Cit,K Council_ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ — — FROM: Planning Commission _ _ _ — _ _ — _ _ _ _ — SUBJECT: Variance _Request as submitted by Slyter Builders- for Kenneth Baumann Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom- mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On September 30, 1983, an application was submitted by Slyter Builders for a variance to reduce the sideyard setback from 6' to 3' to allow the con- struction of an 18' by 24' addition to an existing, non - conforming garage, on the property located at 115 5th Ave. N. W. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 18, 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. 3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that driving into the addition would be a problem if constructed at a different angle, and that the addition as proposed would be the most conducive to the neighborhood. It was noted that the 3' setback was in conformance with the old ordinance when the original structure was built and this is an addition to that structure. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be approved as requested. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice- Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission q 0 RESOLUTION NO. 7550 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05, B.3 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW REDUCTION OF REQUIRED SETBACK TO ALLOW AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING, NON - CONFORMING GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. Slyter Builders of Hutchinson, on behalf of Kenneth Bauman, has applied for a variance from Section 6.05, B.3 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 for a var- iance to allow the reduction of the sideyard setback from six feet to three feet to allow the construction of an 18' x 24' addition to an existing, non - conforming garage on property located at 115 Fifth Avenue Northwest, with the following legal description: The East half of Lot 2, Block 7, North half of the City of Hutchinson, except that part thereof described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2 a distance of 106.80 feet north of the south- east corner of said lot; thence westerly at a right angle to said east line a distance of 4.00; thence northerly, parallel with said east line, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence easterly at a right angle to said east line a distance of 4.00 feet to said east line; thence southerly, along said east line, a distance of 26.00 feet to the beginning. 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the application is granted. 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the pro- posed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply gen- erally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. 9_Zlr RESOLUTION NO. 7550 PAGE 2 CONCLUSION The application for variance for the purpose designated is granted based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of October, 1983. ATTEST: ry D. Plotz City Clerk ames G. DeMeyer Mayor 0 12) 587 -5151 C/t Y 0;- ;-.Ut CI:1[LfSOfV 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 18, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Final Plat for Bethke's Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition as submitted by Bethke Construction, Inc. Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for approval of a final plat. RTSTnRY On September 29, 1983, an application was submitted by Bethke Construction, Inc., for a final plat to be known as Bethke's Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 18, 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983• 3. City Engineer Priebe explained the plat is the second phase of a total plan that had been reviewed earlier. No changes were made. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the final plat be approved as presented. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice - Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 1� 104D lo_ 0 r 4 00, i A. I f i r DD A Bethke's Rolling Greene Second Townhouse MINNONA Addition «LLlF «U! l 14«1N Av LMUI i I nuT 4 0 1 � i ANN [TA[[T F2AC [[[ i �NT POM SONS " 6 9 � [ [ T w, ✓ °F LUOTNE LANE °\, i � T.,,, «9 rFi• ° ! 1 004 F 0 a • i RESOLUTION NO. 7551 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT FOR ROLLING GREENS SECOND TOWNHOUSE ADDITION WHEREAS, Mr. Larry Bethke of Hutchinson, owner and subdivider of the land proposed to be platted as Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition, has submitted his application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all pro- ceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the Laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordi- nance of the City of Hutchinson and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in McLeod County, Minnesota, to -wit; That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 30 West, McLeod County, Minnesota, de- scribed as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said North- west Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 55 minutes 45 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the north line of said Northwest Quarter, 1068.51 feet; thence South 1 degree 57 minutes 15 seconds West, 279.65 feet; thence South 0 degrees 04 minutes 15 seconds West, 150.00 feet; thence South 88 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds East, 177.60 feet; thence South 47 de- grees 37 minutes 30 seconds East, 95.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 47 degrees 37 min- utes 30 seconds East, 105.82 feet; thence South 26 degrees 06 minutes 13 seconds East, 222.07 feet to the northwest corner of Bethke's Rolling Greens Townhouse Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence North 72 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East, along the north line of said Addition; thence northerly 436.23 feet along the east line of Block 1 of Greens View Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, to a point 7.00 feet southerly from the northeast corner of said Block 1; thence South 50 degrees 50 minutes 30 seconds West, 331.94 feet to the point of beginning. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That said plat of Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition is hereby ap- proved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordi- nances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota. 2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution in the office of the County Recorder for their use as required by M.S.A. 462.358(3). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon said RESOLUTION NO. 7551 PAGE 2 plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of October, 1983. ATTEST: James G. DeMeyer Mayor Gary D. Plotz City Clerk 0 �7 -(612) 587.5151 HUTCH CITY OF 1 O e L!3 hISON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Vacation of Easement - Sidelot Easements on Greens View Addition Submitted by Bethke Contstruction, Inc. Pursuant to Section 5.962 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 4669 the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for easement vacation. HISTORY On September 30, 1983, a petition was submitted by Larry H. Bethke to vacate the sidelot easements of GREENS VIEW ADDITION. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 18, 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was filed and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983 and Thursday, October 11, 1983• 3. The request is necessary as new plat overrides GVA. New easements have been established on the new plat. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the vacation of the easements as petitioned for be granted. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice - Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Ig 0 0 ORDINANCE NO. 22/83 AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE SIDELOT EASEMENT LOCATED IN GREEN S VIEW ADDITION THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and it was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to vacate said sidelot easement. SECTION 2. That sidelot easement is described as follows: Greens view Addition SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication and upon filing certified copy thereof with the proper County officers as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of November, 1983. James G. DeMeyer Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Clerk (612) 587 -5151 �17- 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST ��/ HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Submitted Hutchinson Public Schools Pursuant to Section 6.07, C.5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On September 29, 1983, an application was submitted by Hutchinson Public Schools for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 24' by 24, wood framed garage as an accessory building to a concrete block building on the property located at 980 Second Ave. S.E., which is located in and I -1 Zone. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 18, 1983, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. It was noted that this was identical to the request made by the Hutchinson Public Schools in October of 1982. The structure was not started withing the 6 month time frame stipulated in a conditional use permit, so a new permit request was required. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. 3. The request is necessary because the property is located in an I -1 zone. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the conditional use permit to allow the aforementioned request be granted, contingent upon the following conditions: The building must be moved off the site upon sale of the land, the building must have a foundation, and the color combination should be the same as the main existing building. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice- Chairman 1� Hutchinson Planning Commission $� , oAISa oV� i e 4T.w&L Mn IS u , 1 < 1r l 1 I I n W LVT'AiRCNO ' . i rrk fu 1 � 6c nl I paov,�,11 r .tic: I i no 0 • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 7552 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07, C.5 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A WOOD- FRAMED GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. The Hutchinson Public Schools of Hutchinson has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordi- nance No. 464 to allow construction of a twenty -four foot by twenty -four foot (24' x 24') wood - framed garage as an accessory building to a concrete block build- ing in a I -1 zone, with a common description of 980 Second Avenue Southeast and a legal description of: Lot 2, except the Southerly 17.00 feet thereof, and Lot 1 in Block 1, Hutchinson Industrial District, according to the plat thereof on file 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Com- mission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic condi- tions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the ef- fect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate sur- rounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above, with the stipulations the build- ing be moved off of the site upon sale of the land, the building have a foundation, and the color combination be the same as the main existing building. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of October, 1983. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk James G. DeMeyer, Mayor q�lvf (672) 587 -5151 CITY OF FSU i "CI uL'SOfal 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 submitted PX City Staff Pursuant to Section 6.06 C.1, og Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request. HISTORY At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on September 20, 1983, a public hearing was set for October 18, 1983 for the consideration of amending Section 4: Definitions, by adding the following definition: KENNEL: ANY PREMISES USED BY A PERSON, FIRM, PARTNERSHIP, OR CORPORATION ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BREEDING, BUYING, SELLING OR BOARDING DOGS. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the zoning ordinance have been complied with. 2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 69 1983. 3. The proposal was deemed to be appropriate and in the best interest of the community. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the definition listed above be added to Zoning Ordinance No. 464, Section 4: Definitions. Respectfully submitted, Roland Ebent, Vice - Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 9.,1t� PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 19/83 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 464 CONCERNING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: Ordinance No. 464, City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Zoning Ordinance Section Four is amended to include: KENNEL: Any person, firm, partnership or corporation engaged in the business of breeding, buying, selling or boarding dogs. Passed this ATTEST Gary D. Plotz day of 1983. James G. DeMeyer, Mayor (612) 587 -5151 OF MUFCHMISON WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST �' NUTCHlNSON, MINM 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: October 19, 1983 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: Final Plat for South Grade Road Subdivision Submitted by County Zoning Administrator Ed Homan At the regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission on October 18, 1983 the above referenced plat was considered. City Engineer Priebe noted that it is the same as the sketch plan and preliminary plat submitted at earlier meetings. He also stated that the plat as proposed is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive plan. The plat has been rezoned from agricultural to Rural Residential by the County. The plat is outside of City limits but has been referred to the City because it is withing the two -mile radius. It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the final plat be approved as submitted. 9_,� North line of NW I/4 of Sec.12 N; 20.00 East (o5sumed bearing) r� f - 333.70--- N COUNTY HIGHWAY NO. 82 (SOUTH GRADE ROAD) a 171.22 1 co 0 N I i BLOCK i ul �OI mo ti N 1w QD M ro I in a M l e LOT 1 I zl I I I I 20� �10 I I 10 1_ I � I N 161.43 T 0 -•-322.14 - 584°45'00`E 0 160.75 N I I I ONE:W I Mo co O O Ito O O LOT 2 ro v a Iz I F20 i 1 I - - I 160.71 0 0 -J s-- _L 1. Name of Applicant Address 2. Organization Address 3. Place to be Held 6 v i 4. Band Already Booked I D rQ� 5. Name of Band 6. Have you run dances in Hutc 7. Date Dance to be Held: before? N b Elsewhere? n� s 8'. I understand that according to Minnesota Statutes, Ch. 624, Sec. 624.50: 'OFFICER MUST ATTEND ALL PUBLIC DANCES. It shall be incumbent upon the person to whom such permit is issued to have an officer of the law present at every public dance to be given or held thereunder dur- ing all the time the public dance is being held. In the case of a pub- lic dance to be held or given in a city, village, or borough, such offi- cer of the law shall be designated by the chief peace officer thereof. In all other cases such officer of the law shall be designated by the sheriff of the county. In all cases the fees and expenses of such offi- cer of:,the law shall be paid in advance by the person to whom the permit has been issued. In case any person, not a public officer, shall be designated as such officer of the law, the person to whom the permit has been issued shall be responsible for his acts and conduct and there shall be no liability for his acts and conduct on the part of the officer desig- nating him under the provisions of Section 624.42 to 624.54. Signature of Applicant 9. Recommendation of Chief of Police` 10. Action of City Council tie �4�� - z 1 - 3 11. Fees and Expenses of Officer* *(Payable in Advance) ., PM /0 -ot , APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO HOLD PUBLIC DANCAil FEE $5.00* _CXC7Y0HUT' -'4GN 1. Name of Applicant Address 2. Organization Address 3. Place to be Held 6 v i 4. Band Already Booked I D rQ� 5. Name of Band 6. Have you run dances in Hutc 7. Date Dance to be Held: before? N b Elsewhere? n� s 8'. I understand that according to Minnesota Statutes, Ch. 624, Sec. 624.50: 'OFFICER MUST ATTEND ALL PUBLIC DANCES. It shall be incumbent upon the person to whom such permit is issued to have an officer of the law present at every public dance to be given or held thereunder dur- ing all the time the public dance is being held. In the case of a pub- lic dance to be held or given in a city, village, or borough, such offi- cer of the law shall be designated by the chief peace officer thereof. In all other cases such officer of the law shall be designated by the sheriff of the county. In all cases the fees and expenses of such offi- cer of:,the law shall be paid in advance by the person to whom the permit has been issued. In case any person, not a public officer, shall be designated as such officer of the law, the person to whom the permit has been issued shall be responsible for his acts and conduct and there shall be no liability for his acts and conduct on the part of the officer desig- nating him under the provisions of Section 624.42 to 624.54. Signature of Applicant 9. Recommendation of Chief of Police` 10. Action of City Council tie �4�� - z 1 - 3 11. Fees and Expenses of Officer* *(Payable in Advance) ., PM /0 -ot , n G 0 0 $ 232.19 *I Retetirement Corp. OCTOBER 25, 1983 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING phone charges 7121.09 WATER & SEWER FUND Sec. Sec. $216.88 *Hutchinson Telephone Co. phone charges 859.3S *State Treasurer Sec. Sec. 325.02 *State Treasurer PERA 67.00 American Water Works Assn. AWWA dues 992.54 Blue Cross Blue Shield Nov. med. ins. 557.96 Central Garage repair jobs 44.63 Firemans Fund Schools Inc. Nov. LTD ins. 50.00 Floor Care Supply cleaning supplies 33.97 Fitzloff Hardware supplies 44.02 Mn. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Nov. life ins. 253.75 Miller Davis Co. office supplies 27.60 Kenneth Merrill logis meeting 38.77 Midwest Bus. Products binders 6.92 Plaza OK Hardware supplies 127.29 Power Process Equipment supplies 150.00 RCM testing 332.99 State Treasurer PERA 290.40 Zep Mfg. Co. chemicals 38.00 Zins Machining repairs 1762.08 Water Products Inc. meters $ parts 217.10 Canada Life Assurance Co. Sept. -Oct dental ins. 4969.50 Layne Mn. Company repairs to pump 248.54 Van Bergen 4 Markson parts $ 11,438.91 GENERAL FUND employer contribution $ 232.19 *I Retetirement Corp. 2530.52 *Hutchinson Telephone Co. phone charges 7121.09 *State Treasurer Sec. Sec. 3662.66 *State Treasurer PERA 3.00 Badge A Minit supplies 51.70 Air Repair Inc. oil 204.95 AMI Inc. parts 4.00 Asphalt Institute publications 392.04 Burns Manor proceeds 1794.45 Carrs Tree Service tree removal etc. 30.40 City of Hutchinson bldg permit 832.52 Fahey Sales Agency auction expenses 8.37 Master Lock Co. 8 keys 406.44 Midland Lines Inc. $ of bus income 20.00 Mn. Instr. Mat. Center publications 112.81 Sec. State Bank parts assessment search refund 2.00 Tri Co. Abstract Co. 3984.00 Hanson Gravel $ Fill dirt fill 164.06 STewart Sandwiches arena supplies 117.50 Alaskan Air Cond. repairs 290.40 Busse Garden Center plants 2619.16 Canada Life Assurance Co. Se t- Oct.dental ins. p 10.00 Gene Baasen $safety shoes -2- Richard Euerle subpoena fee 10.40 Clint Gruett Mn.Fire Chief conv. 139.84 Eugene Havelka refund variance (check lost) 5.00 Doug Meier gasoline 4.00 Martin Prieve 6 spruce trees 150.00 Richard Popp Mn.Fire Chief Conv 84.62 JOe Sic mini stage construction 50.00 George Nelson repairs 153.00 Amoco Oil Co. gasoline 165.39 Atkinson Blacktop Inc. street materials 369.25 Accuease registration forms 290.00 Brinkman Studio 15.00 Blue Cross Blue Shield Nov. medical ins. 12,465.79 Central Garage auction proceeds 6822.69 Central Garage repair jobs 5680.13 Coast to Coast supplies 17.48 Copy Equipment supplies 15.85 Co. Treasurer airport taxes last half 1550.45 Co. Treasurer dl fees for county 82.50 Div. of Boiler Inspection boiler license permits 125.00 Earl F. Anderson 4 Assoc. signs 619.50 Firemans Fund Schools Inc. Nov. LTD ins. 547.94 1st Bank of Minnesota- parts 36.83 1st Bank of Minnesota repairs 61.15 Floor Care Supply supplies 1579.30 Fitzloff Hardware supplies 170.90 Pamida supplies 49.78 Gopher Sign Co. sings 36.75 Great Plains Supply supplies 14.07 Geo. Field Mn.Fire Chief Conv. 235.88 Holmsten Ice Rinks supplies 207.09 HAVTI auction proceeds 774.74 Henrys Candy Co. supplies arena 123.60 Hutch Community Hospital laundry 5.40 Hutch Iron 4 Metal pipe 34.00 Hutch Utilities auction proceeds 137.35 Hutch Fire $ Safety inspections 35.30 Orlin Henke Mn.STate Fire Chief Conv. 119.27 ICMA Retirement Corp. employer contribution 154.79 Ind. School Dist. 423 1983 yearbook 20.00 Jerabek Machine parts 13.11 Johnson Super Valu soda 2.14 Juul Contracting demolition of structure 1450.00 Krasen Plbg. & Htg. parts 10.00 Lamberts Hi Way car maintenance 3.00 Mn. Toro Inc. repairs $ parts 776.08 Mn.Mutual Life INS. Nov. Life ins. 454.77 Mankato Mobile Radio parts 59.00 Kenneth Merrill finance officers mtg. 82.65 Morton Salt salt 1068.06 McGarvey Coffee police coffee 48.80 Northland Beverages arena acct. 48.77 Plaza OK Hardware supplies 91.50 Gary Plotz voter reg. mileage 26.00 r 3- Marlow Priebe seminars The Patco Co. grader blade Quades repairs R.L.Polk Co. reg. manual Schlueters Refrigeration repairs Shell Oil Co. gasoline Simonson Lbr Co. supplies State Treasurer PERA James Schaefer z Oct. $ extra legal fees U 0 f Mn. registration fees Wm. Mueller $ Sons street materials *Commissioner of Revenue arena Sept. sales tax *U.S. Postmaster postage for meter BOND FUNDS 1981 Parking Rev. Bonds Bennie Carlson contract payment Co. Treasurer last half taxes Co. Treasurer last half taxes Penfield Inc. appraisals Gopher Sign signs Bonds of 1981 Ronald Nystrom assessment refund Thomas Bipes assessment refund BONDS OF L983 1st Natl Bank of Mpls. public funds charges Norwest Bank of Mpl.s fee for initial acceptance Juul Contracting valve box top 34.10 89.50 9.00 20.00 926.00 122.58 230.07 3682.76 1846.37 75.00 276.20 75.45 800.00 70,075.20 $ 669.30 4046.92 759.06 7280.00 434.20 $13,189.48 $ 128.00 220.00 $ 348.00 $ 8.00 S00.00 15.00 $523.00 r 41 0 a 0 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE $2932.66 Ed Phillips $ Sons wine $ liquor 2226.59 Twin City Wine Co. wine $ liquor 1581.32 Twin City Wine Co. wine $ liquor 1829.57 Griggs Cooper Co. wine $ liquor 635.61 Ed Phillips $ Sons wine $ liquor 756.69 State Treasurer Soc. Sec. 209.30 State Treasurer PERA 4052.40 City of Hutchinson payroll $ 14,224.14 1. 2 3 MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 1983 ALL TO ORDER FOR YOUR INFORMATION The regular meeting of the Hutchinson Planning Commission was called to order by Vice - Chairman Roland Ebent at 7:30 P.M., with the following members present: Don Erickson, Shu -Mei Hwang, Thomas Lyke, Elsa Young (7:45 p.m.), and Chairman Ebent. Members absent: Ted Beatty and Larry Romo. Also present: City Engineer Marlow V. Priebe, City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Fire Marshal George Field and City Attorney James H. Schaefer. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting dated September 20, 1983, were approved as presented upon motion by Mr. Erickson. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AS SUBMITTED BY GORDON HEDLUND Vice Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:31 P.M., with the reading of Publication 03156 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6; 1983. The request is to rezone the property located at California Street from R -3, Mulitple Family Residence Zone, to R -5, Mobile Home Park Zone. City Engineer Priebe was present to explain that the request will allow the property owner to expand the Mobile Home Park already there. It was noted that the 27' strip will allow for larger mobile homes in the existing park. Mr. Hedlund will present a new proposed layout for this area if the rezoning is permitted. Dr. Lyke made a motion to close the hearing at 7:33 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. Dr. Lyke made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the request for rezoning the property listed from R -3 to R -5. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY SLYTER BUILDERS FOR KENNETH BAUMANN Vice Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:34 P.M. with the reading of Publication #3157 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. The request is for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of an 18' by 24, addition to an existing, non - conforming garage on 0 • Planning Commission - Minutes October 18, 1983 Page 2 the property located at 115 5th Ave. N. W. City Engineer Priebe noted that the existing garage conformed to the former ordinance requirements for a 3' setback. Mr. Slyter and Mr. and tars. Baumann were present to explain the request. Mrs. Baumann stated that they felt the addition would accomodate their storage and garage needs in a way that would be the most conducive to the neighborhood. It was pointed out that putting the addition in a different place would require the removal of a nice maple tree and it would make access into the garage difficult. Fire Marshal Field asked if the addition would make the structure larger than the ordinance allows. After discussion, staff was directed to locate this stipulation in the ordinance and the hearing remained open. After reviewal, City Engineer stated that there was a requirement of this type in the former ordinance. When the ordinance was reviewed and updated in 1974, it appears this requirement was dropped. When comparing structure size to total square feet in the lot, the structure meets the requirements of the ordinance. After discussion, Mrs. Young made a motion to close the hearing at 8:08 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as requested. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. (n) CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE AS SUBMITTED BY SLYTER BUILDERS FOR KENNETH BAUMANN Vice - Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:10 P.M. with the reading of Publication 43160 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. The request is for a variance to reduce the sideyard setback from 6' to 3' to allow the construction of an 18' by 24' addition to an existing, non - conforming garaage, on the property located at 115 5th Avenue N.W. This request was considered during the discussion for the conditional use permit for the same structure. Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing at 8:11 P.M. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the variance as requested. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT FOR ROLLING GREENS SECOND TOWNHOUSE ADDITION AS SUBMITTED BY BETHKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. A 0 Planning Commission - Minutes October 18, 1983 Page 3 Vice - Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:45 P.M. with the reading of Publication 03158 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. The request is for approval of the final plat for Bethke's Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition. City Engineer Priebe explained that this was the second phase of proposed plan. No changes had been made from total plan submitted before. After discussion, Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing at 7:49 P.M. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the Final Plat for Bethke's Rolling Greens Second Townhouse Addition. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF SIDELOT EASEMENTS OF GREEN'S VIEW ADDITION AS SUBMITTED BY BETHKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Vice Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:50 P.M. with the reading of publication 03159 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. City Engineer Priebe explained that the new plat overrides the old plat and the old easements must be vacated. New easements have been designated on the new plat. The configuration of the land must fit with building lines. After discussion, Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. Dr. Lyke made a motion to recommend to City Council approval for vacating the sidelot easements of Greens View Addition. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY HUTCHINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS Vice - Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:55 P.M. with the reading of publication 53162 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983• The request is for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 24' by 24' wood framed garage as an accessory building to a concrete block building located in an I -1 zone at 980 Second Avenue Southeast. Mr. Jim Mills was present to explain that the request was identical 0 Planning Commission - Minutes October 18, 1983 Page 4 0 to the request submitted and approved in October of 1982. There was a problem with obtaining the Certificate of Title, so the permit was not recorded and the structure was not started within the month time frame, so a new request was required. He stated that the school will comply with any and all contingencies to the permit as stated previously. After discussion, Dr. Lyke made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Young made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the same contingencies as stated before. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE - SECTION 4, AS SUBMITTED BY STAFF Vice - Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:12 P.M. with the reading of publication 43161 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1983. The request is to amend the ordinance by adding the following definition to Zoning Ordinance 4464, Section 4: Definitions: KENNEL; ANY PREMISES USED BY A PERSON, FIRM, PARTNERSHIP, OR CORPORTATION ENGAGED IN THE BUSINESS OF BREEDING, BUYING, SELLING OR BOARDING DOGS. City Administrator Plotz explained that the wording had been changed as discussed at the September 20 meeting. The change was prompted by a complaint about a dog kennel in a residential zone. City Attorney Schaefer commented that the City Council may go on to establish further requirements in a separate dog ordinance, but Zoning Ordinance amendments must go through the Planning Commission. After discussion, Mr. Hwang made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. Dr. Lyke make a motion to recommend to City Council adoption of the new definition of "kennel ", and that the definition be added to the zoning ordinance. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. There was a question from the audience about if this referred to veterinarians. City Attorney Schaefer responded that holding a dog after treatment would not be considered "boarding ". 4. Old Business (a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT FOR "SOUTH GRADE ROAD SUBDIVISION" SUBMITTED BY ED HOMAN, COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 0 t Planning Commission - Minutes October 18, 1983 Page 5 0 City Engineer Priebe commented that this final plat was the same as the sketch plan and preliminary plat considered and recommended for approval at the previous meetings. It was referred to the Planning Commission as it is outside City limits but within the two -mile radius. Mr. Priebe commented also that it conforms with the City's Comprehensive Plan. It was rezoned to Rural Residential. After discussion, Dr. Lyke made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the final plat as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. 5. NEW BUSINESS City Engineer Priebe commented about Land Use Planning workshops offered by the State in early December. He noted that they are often worthwhile for planning commission members. He plans to attend. City Administrator Plotz noted that funds are budgeted for that purpose. Anyone interested in attending should contact Mr. Plotz. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 P.M. upon motion by Mr. Erickson. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. • • ^1��,92� 1222��Q pCTI'33 N � BVI league of minnesota cities October 19, 1983 TO: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks From: Don Slater, Executive Director Cathy Quiggle, Research Assistant RE: Cable Legislation Attached is a summary of HR 4103, the Cable Telecommunications Act of 1983, introduced October 6 by Rep. Tim Wirth, Chairman of the House Telecommunications Subcommittee. The bill is contrary to the League policy which provides for local control of cable television. The major problems with the bill are that it: -- Prohibits local governments from regulating basic cable television rates, unless the community has less than four television stations; -- Provides for a presumption and expectancy of renewal of cable television franchises, with a de novo court review should local government try to award franchise to a competitor of the existing company; -- Permits the abrogation of contract provisions covering facilities and equipment and cable services; and - -Fail to completely grandfather existing franchises. ` The House is expected to hold hearings on this bill in late October. The %nY cable industry is lobbying intensely in favor of this bill, thus it is crucial for concerned city officials to contact congressional representatives and for strong opposition to.the bill. You may also want to request an opportunity to testa y against the bill and thereby delay action. In any case, House members need to hear the views of city officials right away. For more information contact Cathy Quiggle at the League office; (612) 227 -5600. I 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 [61 23 227 -5600 H.R. 4103 allows the FCC to establish different regulations when systems have at least 36 channels and 70 percent of the households are subscribers. Franchise fees. As in the Senate bill, franchise fees could not exceed five percent of gross revenues. Franchise fees include assessments and taxes but do not include taxes of general applicability and franchise enforcement requirements such as bond, penalties, and liquidated damages. Services. The bill grandfathers service requirements in existing franchises. The operator could remove a particular service if a significant change in circumstances occurred. Whether such removal was justified would be settled through litigation. The cable operator would not need to replace the service with a similar service. Facilities. A city could require certain cable system facilities (channel capacity) and access- related facilities (studios). After negotiating with the city, an operator could remove such facilities if a significant change in circumstances occurred. The city and the operator would submit any unresolved disputes to binding arbitration. Municipal ownership. When a franchise expires, a city could buy a cable system for fair market value, resolving price disputes through binding arbitration. The bill does not set a minimum price when a franchise is terminated for cause, however the operator would be entitled to de novo court review of the basis for termination. The bill requires an independent board or management company to make programming decisions for a municipally owned system. No elected or appointed official could serve on the board. Industrial Development Bonds In an effort to raise tax revenues, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dan Rostenkowski proposed (with administration support) a state by state volume cap on the issuance of all private - purpose industrial development bonds. The plan would cut IDB volume in half by limiting private- purpose IDBs to $100 per capita. This cap would not apply to mortgage revenue bonds. Some tax committee members support this proposal because it does not restrict particular types of projects, rather it restricts the volume, leaving controversial decisions on appropriate uses of IDBs with the state legislatures. The main provisions of the proposal include limiting private - purpose IDBs to $100 per capita. State and city issuers would split this volume cap based on 1983 experience. Thus, governmental units that issued large amounts of IDBs in 1983 would get a larger portion of the volume cap than those with relatively small issuances. Some interpret the bill as authorizing the state legislatures to change these allocations, but this authority is not clear. Governmental units could transfer all or a portion of.their allocation. In 1983 Minnesota has already used 182 percent of its proposed 1984 cap. If passed, this proposal would result in a significant reduction of projects. Rep. Pickle is opposed to restricting IDBs solely on the basis of population. Instead he supports allocations based on economic distress or need for economic development. In response to the volume cap proposal, Pickle has H.R. 4103 allows the FCC to establish different regulations when systems have at least 36 channels and 10 percent of the households are subscribers. Franchise fees. As in the Senate bill, franchise fees could not exceed five percent of gross revenues. Franchise fees include assessments and taxes but do not include taxes of general applicability and franchise enforcement requirements such as bond, penalties, and liquidated damages. Services. The bill grandfathers service requirements in existing franchises. The operator could remove a particular service if a significant change in circumstances occurred. whether such removal was justified would be settled through litigation. The cable operator would not need to replace the service with a similar service. Facilities. A city could require certain cable system facilities (channel capacity) and access - related facilities (studios). After negotiating with the city, an operator could remove such facilities if a significant change in circumstances occurred. The city and the operator would submit any unresolved disputes to binding arbitration. Municipal ownership. when a franchise expires, a city could buy a cable system for fair market value, resolving price disputes through binding arbitration. The bill does not set a minimum price when a franchise is terminated for cause, however the operator would be entitled to de novo court review of the basis for termination. The bill requires an independent board or management company to make programming decisions for a municipally owned system. No elected or appointed official could serve on the board. to • • APPLICATION FOR-__.�Ha�_E�jlaAL PERMIT a -0 CITY COUNCIL TOth-6 ..... I ..................... . .............. ......................... . .... . ................................... . .................... . ...... .. I ......................................... . .......... ................. ....... .. -- of the ..... CITY HUTCHINSON ..................... . .............. in the County Of . ........................ I ............ ............. . ................. of . . . ...................... .... . .. ..... ... . .. ................... MC LEOD ..................... .......................... ............ .......... ...................... I State of Minnesota: The undersigned owner whose addreas JS� �- G; ....................... . ...... . ..................... . ... . ... ........... ...... . .................. .... .............. . . ............................... hereby applies for a permit to....RQW.-AND - -- -.---- REMOVE SNOW WITH .................................... . ................... .v .. 2.1- 5.2.... ------- . ....................... . ....................... . ................ . . ... ...... upon that ocriain, tract of land described as follows: Lot.._ ...... ................ .................... ; Block ........................................ .. plator addition ............. ....... ......... ............................... . ........... ........ address................. .. ......................_......-° -- . . . ............. .... -- which is of 14 following size and area; width...._...._.__ _.__........ ...... ._.feet; length . .......... .. ..... ..... . ... feet; area . ...... WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS .. ...... I .... .................. - ----- ......................................... ...... — -- ... ................. .......... ........ ... . . ......... - ........ ........................... .. ... . and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and spe-clfwations therefor herewith submitted and with all the ordinances of said .......... CITY .... OF ... HU.TCH.1.N.S.ON ....... .. . ..................... ........... ......... . .. .... . . . ............... . .... ------ ..... ......... . .. . ...... applicable thereto. .4ppZicant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specified as follows: APPLICATION FOR__ show rr�oynL PERMIT To the ...... CITY COUNCIL ....... . ............................ ...... ................... _ ........................ _ ................ ............................. .................... ............. .............. ........ _..... ........... _ .......... _.. of the ...... _..... CITY.._ ....... ........ f HUTCHINSON in the County of o ........._.........._ ...................................... ............................... MC LEOD .................. State of Ati� caota; _...._..- ........ ......................_..... _ ....._......... l// The undersigned caner whose address i a .............................. CL ' �.. Y�� .............hereby ¢ppl' for a permit to...._PL..OW._ AND ........... C 1 REMOVE SNOW WITH �- / ............ .................. ...._.__.................._.... :.._ :....._._!rL_Cr S'. �.1._....... i - ..u`.3V..... �yvlcG'c:.... t' -..c4 i upon that certain tract of land described as follows: Lot_. ------- .._... ........................... ....: Block ......... ..._ .................. .._ _...., plator addition. --- ........ ............. .._ ... ... ._ ..... ............... ... ....... _ ............. ._; address ................................. -- - -- - .................._...-- _ ...._......; which is of the following size and area; width_ ............ ....__-- ._._...__- ---- -- - - - -- feet; length__ ....... - ------- ... .... ___._. _ feet; area ......WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS ....._........._ . ...... ................__....... - ........_. and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor herewith submitted and with all the ordinances of said ......... CITY OF HUTCHINSON ................................................... -. -.............._...................I. .._..__._..._------ .......__... . applicable thereto. .Applicant further agrees to pay fees or assessmente at the time and in the amounts apealf+ed as follows: .......................... _ .................... - .............. ..... ..... ....- -- - ..._._..._.. ........ Owner APPL6ATION FOR -_ sNgH r� Ia'nWERMIT To the ........ CITY COUNCIL ........... ....... _ ..... ......... ............................................................................ .... . of the- ..... ..._CITY f SON......----..._ _ ......................... .............................in the County of ..._ ............... ....... _ .........._.......... -o ..._...... HUTCHIN .............. S ..................... MC._ LEOD .................... .... ........................... ., State o inneeota,: undersigned owner whose address is ....................... ` 1 _ ........ ............... - -- --- ----------- - ------ _.._....._......- ......._..._ .................. _..._------_.._........ .--.--- ........._...__.._.L._!V ._..._...... reby applies for a permit to ..... SNOW WITH ...........-._ ...................-...............__......_......._....._......._-....._..............._......-...__...._.............................. ................_.............. - -- -.- upon that certain tract of land described as follows: Lot ...... --- ........... - ... ................... ; Block .............. - ......... ............... _.._.; plator a ddition._- ..................._.....:.......-.........._._.- ............................_.; address .... ......._ ---- .--- ---------- --- .. ------------- _.. ...---------- --- .---- _- ___....; which is of the following size and area; width ---------- _._..._...... .... ___ .......... feet; length._ ..... ..........._....._.__._....... - feet; area ... ... WITHIN._THE CITY LIMITS ............_......-- ........... ..............�..j..-- --- --- --- ....... -... and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor herewith submitted and with all the ordinances of said........ CITY OF HUTCHINSON ..... .......... _ ........................... _......................... . applicable thereto. ✓Ipplieant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the anounts specified as follows: $1.00 (:0 APPLICATION FOR__sNOw_aEoy __PEF.MIT To the ....... CITY COUNCIL .................................... ..... _ .............. __- .............................. ............................... of the ......_.._CITY ............... Of- ------ _HUTCHINSON ........................................ .......- ........._............ in the County of ..................... MC... LEOD.--..._......... _._..__....................__., State of Minnesota: The undersigned owner whose address is.... Q._I.L..X.._....... v ��......... hereby applies for a permit _.._PLOW._AND_--.__- ........ ........_......- ....._......... \ I REMOVE SNOW WITH t' '� %�..1....___............ - ......................OW..._..... ._- .......................L�F�. -i_ ........._c c7 t ................... upon that certain tract of land described as follows: Lot.-.....-.. ............... .---------- - --.....; Block .......... ---------------- -------- .- plator addit ion............ - .......................... - -- ... ....._..........-- ..._........; address ................................. ........................................ ..... _ -- ... ; . which is of the following size and area; width ......... _......... - . .... ...._- ----------- - feet; length _. _..._.....- -___...___.. -... feet; area ....._WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor herewith submitted and with all the ordinances of said......... CITY OF HUTCHINSON ...................................... ............... ........ .... _... . applicable thereto. Applicant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specified as follows: ��(UHINSOy � • � //I IS iES Hutchinson Utilities Commission October 20, 1983 Hutcninscn, winneso,a Marlow Priebe 2H m o oa- street 55350 City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 553$0 H.W. Filk President E. "Bud" Daggett Vice President Thomas B.Lyke Secretary R.H. Alexander General Manager Tel. 612 /587 -4746 Re: Easement for Pad Mounted Equipment Dear Mfr. Priebe: Hutchinson Utilities long range plans to bury all electrical facilities downtown, bring the need to secure ample area to place multiple transformers and switchgear on the ground. We have immediate need for a space north of the State Theatre. The attached sketch explains the area requested. We request an 8 foot x 32 foot area. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. 1p Enclosure Sincerely, HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION J �. R. H. Alexander General Manager GAS NE TjPf%NJ o -x ea r,e 11 Ju,:7ci+ GE�9,Q 0 0 • Yr. Harlow V. Priebe 37 Washington Ave. _ Hutchinson, Mn. Dear Yr. Priebe: 0 20 October 1983 I have not had an answer from you regarding our conversation on the telephone, about three weeks ago. If you remember corectly, I informed you of the water line ease- ment between my house and the Michael Schmidt home, which crosses Hilltop Drive. The water line hasn't ever frozen in five winters and a couple were very cold. I am concerned about what you intend to do about the level of the street and your putting it back in a "filled in" depth to keep our water line protected from freezing. I suggest that you either fill up the trench you built, or purchase the easement. I will expect a very prompt reply. CC: Michael Schmidt Mayor James DeMeyer Thank You, (/ 7rT`- 41ri0. SWENSOlr— 105 Garden Ed. Hutchinson, Mn. DATE: /`7, /9g3 BY: TITLE: �r�'S • �� COMPANY: Juul Contracting Company CITY: s. Mayor City Clerk CITY OF HUICHINSON, MINNESOTA PROJECT 83 -02 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR PROJECT 83 -08 ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 12" Class 3 R.C.P. L.F. 90 $ /S so- $ 13g5- 8' -10' Deep 2 12" Class 3 R.C.P. - L.F. 60 /(o So q 90.0 10' -12' Deep 3 12" Class 3 R.C.P. - L.F. 40 /% — _- 121-14' Deep_ 4 Cut into Manhole EACH 1 C6 SO JO.00 5 Standard Storm Sewer EACH 1 G75 °b 6 75.0� Manhole 6' Deep 6 Extra Depth in Storm L.F. 3.0 oe 10 Sewer Manhole TOTAL ------ $ 110611.00 DATE: /`7, /9g3 BY: TITLE: �r�'S • �� COMPANY: Juul Contracting Company CITY: s. Mayor City Clerk T 7 J • J 1\ 1] I] C r�� f � t l• ! i 1 Y[ '�. t'._ ��__ � LV-c -C 1. L� _tY ITT 'r• + - I 02 I 2 11i 1 is — r.. �(> 7 d L4 I rv; r, ! .j ao - .rat - My [� 7d_ 6a , .1 1 —i brl - d41- �S' 1 >= r,1I- oY - '1-. .3 3 i� ��7 7 r _ _ 111 II L9 _ II C11 3q '21L 111111 of '_..� -'1 __I �'I ?Ii I!(7I 9 >•9 - X51 _ _ T r 65, 1t.-1 t _ _ '!I I' II �' -- - - I -r I I I ..I I Ij 3. 3if9 Sah a5 T Illeg � 19 b'I zz tC,' n d of 11b .L. II r c7 "i r, 7i L °b . 4 s�� ,try _.I l3jN�' �J ti.. LY ' 1 4.IYd3 7l5 V. 13 '1 �' z 331 lit ".lie _. i 4 `y _ _ .'lIll ' b9 i5� -?�v{ 412 Apic 1 £5_2 �\ 19 I cll --,� - _ b y I IIII u23 '� {I? I /78S" (i I I- I1� r— 11 ^(?1 JY 811 _ II E 173 - I -. I' r T' _; , �T q, _ 37 ' Si I/7] I f ;,: _ 1 ra - tt v/- A .7 It Sa' - Sd- 31',... 041 n _- JI T{ __ ._ L I.T1.,:J 17 _ q1I 1 2 G y�L15 dpi °:' 303 1] Q7 I✓j9i f41123 1 '.J -�--�I i •r �'7 i L IVIUINIL.If hL 1 II Vnl '4`.L OFOCFRS ASSOCIATION 7 eK 7J� Qr YOUR 11,!1 iiRiiY1ATI0N THE ISSUE: STATE -BY -STATE 1OLUVIE CAPS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVEIJOP\IEW BOND E1MDWED BY HOUSE PANEL. In a closed door session, the U.S. House ]Nays and ',leans Committee approved a $150 per capita volune limit on tax - exempt industrial development bonds (IDBs). This restriction on the annual level of bond issuance will apply to IDBs issued for rental housing, pollution control, small issues, industrial parks and such public - purpose facili- ties as ports and airports. Excluded from the list are student loan bonds, mortgage revenue bonds, and bonds issued by 501(c)(3) organizations (hospitals and educational facili- ties). Restrictions on cost recovery for IDB- financed property are also included. AC71CN NEEDED: Contact your Congressional delegation especially those %lembers that serve on tax - writing committees (see list below) to oppose volume caps. Encourage your Congressmen to speak to their colleagues on ways and Means and Senate Finance. If you have any questions concerning the legislation, do not hesitate to contact Cathy Spain or Cathie Eitelberg in the NIFOk Washington office at (202) 466 -2014. Do not delay. House action may occur as early as the week of October 24th. BACKGIOUNp: Under pressure to limit IDB volume and raise revenues to finance the popular Mortgage Revenue Bond Program, the House Ways and Means Comnittee approved a volume cap beginning in 1984. The proposal provides for a two -year phase -in adjustment for those jurisdictions whose 1983 volume exceeds the 1984 cap. Each state's cap will be allocated 50 percent to the state and 50 percent to local issuers on the basis of population, unless the state legislature or the governor determines an alternate method of allocation. A special allocation for hone -rule cities will be available. Refinancing of outstanding issues (so long as maturity is not extended) and rollover of short - term construction financing will not count towards the cap. Other changes include the extension of the depreciation period of sewage and solid waste disposal facilities and air and pollution control facilities. The use of IDBs for the purchase of land or existing facilities will be eliminated unless: purchaser is using proceeds for substantial rehabilitation. or proceeds are used by a first -time farmer /ranchers where no more than $250,000 in IDB financing per principal user is outstanding after issuance. The bill will also: Limit the amount of small -issue IDBs outstanding after issuance to $40 million; - over - • S • Deny tax exemption for bond issues with Federal guarantees such as FSLIC -and FDIC- insured bonds, but excluding VA, FIR and student loan guarantees; • Apply limits on small -issue IDBs to entire projects, rather than each user (e.g., multi -story buildings); • Extend mortgage subsidy bond arbitrage rules to IDBs; and • Eliminate use of tax - exempt bonds for liquor stores, sky- boxes, airplanes and gambling establishments. As a matter of policy, the..IFM supports Congressional efforts to restrict the issuance of tax - exempt, small -issue conduit bonds and IDBs issued for exempt facilities that do not serve a public purpose. However, the Association has said it opposes federal legislative proposals which would impose state -by- state volume limits on the issuance of tax - exempt bonds. 'We object to this policy option and, in particular, the current proposal before Congress because State -by -state volume caps do not distinguish between those bonds issued to serve a public purpose and those that provide lower cost financing for private purposes. There- fore, public - purpose, exempt facilities such as ports and airports cane under the cap. As the years go by, new Congresses may further reduce the cap and include other types of tax-exempt bonds under the cap. Some jurisdictions in need of economic development may be denied the opportunity to issue IDBs while others with lesser needs might be encouraged to use their portion of a limit and issue the bonds. Setting state -by -state volume caps at the federal level is a relatively simple task. However, the allocation of that cap within a state among state and local issuers would be extremely difficult. Allocations determined by the state legislature may place politically unpopular projects at a competitive disadvantage. Caps impose additional reporting and administrative re- quire;llents on state and local officials. Senate Finance Conmittee Republicans Democrats Robert Dole (Kan.) - Chairman R 11 Bob Packwood (Ore.) William Y. Roth, Jr. (Del.) John C. Danforth (Mo.) John H. Chafee (R.I.) John Heinz (Pa.) Malcolm Wallop (Wyo.) David Durenberger (Minn.) William L. Armstrong (Colo.) Stever. 0. Symms (Idaho) Charles E. Grassley (Iowa) usse 6. Long (La.) - Ranking Minority Member Lloyd Bentsen (Texas) Spark M. Ma Lscnana (Hawaii) Daniel P. Moynihan (N.Y.) Max Baucus (Mont.) David L. Boren (Okla.) Bill Bradley (N.J.) George J. Mitchell (Maine) David Pryor (Ark.) All members of Congress can be reached at: 202/224 -3121. House Rays and Means Calmittee Democrats Republicans Dan Rostenkowski (111.) - Chairman Sam M. Gibbons (Fla.) J. J. Pickle (Texas) Charles B. Rangel (N.Y.) Fortney H. (Pete) Stark (Calif.) James R. Jones (Okla.) Andrew Jacobs, Jr. (Ind.) Harold E. Ford (Tenn.) Ed Jenkins (Ga.) Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.) Thomas J. Downey (N.Y.) Cecil (Cec) Heftel (Hawaii) Wyche Fowler, Jr. (Ga.) Frank J. Guarini (N.J.) James M. Shannon (Mass.) Marty Russo (111.) Donald J. Pease (Ohio) Kent Hance (Texas) Robert T. Matsui (Calif.) Beryl F. Anthony, Jr. (Ark.) Ronnie G. Flippo (Ala.) Byron L. Dorgan (N.D.) Barbara B. Kennelly (Conn.) Barber B. Conable, Jr. (N.Y.) - Ranking Minority Member John J. Duncan (Tyne.) Bill Archer {Texas) G1 :er Jagt (Mich.) Philip M. Crane (111.) Bill Frenzel (Minr.I James G. Martin (N.C.) Richard T. Schulze (Pa.) Willis 0. Gradi son, Jr. (Ohio) W. Henson Moore (La.) Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. (S.C.) (C William M. Thomas alif.) t i Thorsen Campbell Rolando & Lehne RicTard D Thorsen, C.PA. Robert S. Campbell, C F.A. Cha -Les L. Rola.-r9o, ]r_ C.P.A. Floyd ]. Leh. C.P.A. Deno. D. McGJI, C.P.A. ;.I., 1. Oml, C P.A. Suite 300 Parkdale Four 5353 Gamble Drive Minneapolis MN 55416 (612) 546 -0404 1- 800- 742 -5684 (Minnesota only) Certified Public Accountants �J D October 10, 1983 FOR YOUR INFORMATION To Our Clients and Friends: We want you to know about some very exciting things that are happening here at the firm. We have just completed arrangments to combine our accounting practice with the practice of Charles Bailly & Company. Our new combined firm will be one of the largest regional firms in the Northwest and will have offices in Minneapolis, Hutchinson, Fargo, Sioux Falls, Bismarck and Great Falls. We are especially excited because we believe that our combined strengths will enable us to serve our clients even better. Both firms have had extensive experience in a wide variety of industries, but we are especially known for our work in banking, construction, and (in the case of Charles Bailly & Company) in the health care field. All of us here at Thorsen, Campbell, Rolando & Lehne will continue to be available to serve you, but we will also have the full resources of Charles Bailly & Company to call upon. Our Managing Partner, Dick Thorsen, will continue as the Administrative Partner of the Minneapolis office of the firm. In addition, Dick will serve on the three - person Executive Committee of Charles Bailly & Company, the name we will practice under. Charles Bailly & Company was formed in 1978 by the partners of the Fargo and Bismarck offices of Broeker Hendrickson & Co. when they withdrew from that firm rather than joining in a merger with a large semi- national firm. The current Managing Partner of Charles Bailly & Company is Reed Stigen, who had been a partner with Adrian S. Helgeson & Company prior to joining Broeker Hendrickson & Co. We are pleased to be associated with Reed Stigen once again - -he originally started as a staff accountant with our firm of Anderson,,Helgeson,. Lieser & Thorsen. Our previous ties were broadened further through our mutual memberships in The American Group of C.P.A. Firms where we shared professional resources and development programs. In addition, our firm conducted a peer review at Charles Bailly & Company for the AICPA Division of C.P.A. Firms in which the firm received an unqualified opinion. - We plan to talk with you in person about our new association. In the meantime if you have any questions, we welcome you to call us at the same number that you have always used in the past. We look forward to continue serving you in the years to come. erel The Partners of Thorsen�Campbell, R Lando & Lehne (Now partners in the combined firm of Charles Bailly & Company) Member of The Amencan Group of C.P.A. Firms with offices in principal cities 0 Dear Mr. Plotz: 0 THE WHITE HOUSE 'L• p,T _o _ WASHINGTON 1 (; October 11, 1983 FOR YOUR INFORMATION It was good of you to send President Reagan the resolution regarding the brutal Soviet massacre of 269 innocent civilians on board Korean Air Lines Flight 007. The President has put the Kremlin on notice: When it comes to standing in the face of such a barbaric act there are no longer Republicans or Democrats -- only Americans united and determined to protect our freedom and secure the peace. The continuing response of our country and the international community to this wanton act demonstrates the Soviets' isolation from the civilized world. President Reagan deeply appreciates your thoughtfulness in sending this expression of outrage and resolve. He knows that with your support, as well as that of millions of other Americans, the lessons of this tragedy will be ingrained in the memory of the people of all free nations. With the President's best wishes to you and the members of the Hutchinson City Council, Sincerely, Za., 44�� Anne Higgins Special Assistant to the President and Director of Correspondence Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Clerk City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 October 7, 1983 The Hutchinson City Council RE: City Garbage Contract / Junder Sanitation Dear Councilmembers: OCTt3Q3 `o T FOR YOUR INFORMATION I have been asked to comment on the following questions: 1. Is a mobile home park a commercial account or individual residential account? and; 2. May the City Council assist Junker and certify to taxes a refuse billing that is sent by and owed to Junker Sanitation? The exclusive contract entered into by Junker Sanitary Service, Inc. and the City of Hutchinson provides that "for residential structures containing two or more dwelling units and for each commercial, industrial, educational and religious establishment (Junker's) shall receive from the City of Hutchinson the base sum'of $5.10 for such structure or establishment and shall negotiate with the owner of such structure or establishment, the balance of such charges for garbage and refuse pickup at said structure." The contract goes on to say "(Junker's) shall assume the responsibility for the billing of multiple dwelling, commercial, industrial, educational or religious establishment for charges beyond the base price." This contract has been in effect since July 1, 1980. Although it provides no definition of "commercial establishment" the practice for the entire existence of the contract has been to consider mobile home parks as a "commercial establishment." This was justified by comparing mobile home parks to multiple residence dwellings, ie apartment complexes. Mobile hhme parks are under one owner, operated as a business, and have residents that are of a transient nature. The City has no practical way to determine for billing purposes the number of individual residences in a mobile home park at any one time. For these reasons mobile home parks were included, without apparent objection, as commercial establishments. I can see no legal justification for departing from this practice at this time. Under the terms of the contract Junker is to negotiate a rate with the commercial establishments and is then responsible for billing those establishments. Responsibility for billing Hutchinson City Council October 7, 1983 Page Two implies responsibility for collections. I feel that the city should not utilize its taxing power to enforce private agree- ments. In this particular instance Junkers is claiming an unpaid obligation of over $1,700 while Hedlund contends nothing is owed. The City should not become involved in what is essentially a private contractual dispute. There are alternatives feels the rates charged by may register that complaint appropriate action. He may service and haul the refuse else to haul the refuse. to both parties. If Mr. Hedlund Junker's are unreasonably high, he to the Council who can take also discontinue the collection himself. He may not hire anyone If Junkers are not satisfied with the rates Hedlund is willing to pay, they may discontinue service. If they feel there is a balance owing they may take appropriate legal action to initiate collection procedures. JHS:dlp Sincerely yours, SCHAEFER LAW OFFICE By/ 1 James H. Schaefer Hutchinson City Attorney 0 0 �.vk October 6, 1983 ^IS Mr. Gary Plotz l; Hutchinson, MN 55350 % Dear Gary Plotz and City Council Members: ICi (�� }v ��g91011�2y OCT-f9 FOR Y George Field has done an excellent job educating Hutchinson preschoolers and elementary students about the role of firefighters and the prevention of fires. Last year he gave a ten minute demonstration, used firefighting equipment, and brought the truck to the elementary school for special education students and first graders. The special education preschool students completed the unit by touring the fire station. TIOR Good news among preschool teachers spreads fast concerning this fantastic teaching experience offered by our community's fire marshall. With the increase in early childhood education programs in our city it is difficult for one person to educate preschoolers in addition to the following: kindergarteners, special education students, private and public school elementary students. Hutchinson offers preschool education in the following ways: Little Lambs 30 students (4 demonstrations) Learning Hutch 120 students (6 presentations) Headstart 20 students (1 presentation) Family Day Care 40 students Montessori 20 students (2 presentations) Special Needs Preschool 25 students (2 presentations) Most of the above early childhood educators have contacted George Field, but have been told that there is not time to present the Fire Prevention program to them. I can teach the unit, but is not as effective as when Firefighter George shares the real equipment and experiences. Fire Prevention Week is important for community awareness, through the education of preschool and school age children this information can be shared with their families. Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter. Sincerely, 44�t" &)a6 d Donna Cooper Coop- Preschool Special Education Instructor Learning Hutch Director ROGER L. GILMER Attorney At Law October 19, 1983 0 0 GILMER LAW OFFICE 95 Second Avenue S.E. P.O. Box 338 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator City Hall 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 OCT'. RWFIVED 8Y Area Code 612 Telephone 587 -3757 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Dear Gary: The reason I was withholding payment of my water bill is my disappointment with the service of Junker Sanitation. The first 9 -10 months I was in my location there was no pickup. When I set out what had accumulated, they would only take 3 of the 12 plastic bags. Two months ago we had another problem when we set out several furniture type baxes. They took the 3 plastic bags out of the boxes but left the 6 or 7 cardboard boxes. Both situations were ultimately resolved after several calls to Stillwater. My concern is that my commercial rate is once per month for 3 plastic bags when the residential pickup is weekly without any limitations on amount or kind of refuse. The cost of the 2 services is the same but the benfit derived is vastly different to the point that it is discriminatory. I wanted to bring my concerns up at the hearing on the proposed rate increase but this would be fruitless in that the city is bound by contract to the present level of service and rates. I have enclosed my check. Cordially, GILMER LAW OFFICE Roger L, Gilmer RLG /slj Encl. cc: Esther Quest 1. Surplus Store 2. Lorraine Meyer 3. Theater 4. Coast to Coast 5. Heil Fashions 6. Main Bank *Bank - South Part 8. Drive -in Bank 9. Kamrath 10. Hutch Cafe 11. Sears 12. Quast - Cor. Prop. 13. Quast - Gilmer Law Office n U PREPARED BY: Gerald A. McKinzie Penfield, Inc. September 1983 DOWNTOWN PARKING DISTRICT APPEALS BEFORE AFTER BENEFIT $ 30,500 $ 32,000 5% $ 1,500 $144,000 $151,900 5.5% $ 7,900 $271,500 $297,300 9.5% $ 25,800 $ 91,200 $100,300 10% $ 91100 $ 87,000 $ 93,100 7% $ 6,100 $405,000 $425,300 5% $ 20,300 $230,000 $241,500 5% $ 11,500 $106,500 $109,800 3% $ 3,300 (5 %xLand) $ 54,500 $ 57,500 5.5% $ 3,000 $109,000 $118,800 9% $ 9,800 $ 93,000 $ 98,600 6% $ 5,600 $ 63,000 $ 67,400 7% $ 4,400 $ 61,000 $ 64,100 5% 3,100 $111,400 CITY $ 2,066.44 $ 8,460.49 $ 27,559.48 $ 11,154.14 $ 3,898.49 $ 22,406.51 $ 14,379.15 ($ 2,680.24) Credit $ 3,154.34 $ 11,497.71 $ 6,485.95 $ 5,055.20 $ 3,020.51 $116,458.17 ME -27.4% - 6.6% - 6.4% -18.4% +56.5% - 9.4% -20% UP/ 5 980.24 - 4.9% -14.8% -13.7% -13% 2.6% UWN 4.34% . • 5T �6,kN 21222 i Minnosota Pollution Control A 6' `J OCT 13 1983 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Mr. Jim Welday, P.E. Rieke - Carroll - Muller Associates, Inc. Box 130 i 1011 First Street South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Welday: Re: Sewer System Evaluation Survey for City of Hutchinson EPA Project No. C271363 -01 We are returning the Sewer System Evaluation Survey for the above referenced project to your office with no review. The Agency is not reviewing nor approving these studies without submittal of a Facilities Plan since eligibility of the proposed rehabilitation work is dependent on the approved method of treatment. This is no indication of disagreement with the quality of work, included in this report, but in an .effort to keep our records up to date we request that you hold the Survey and resubmit the Survey with the submittal of the facility plan. This Agency will be providing you with comments concerning the Pretreatment Program in the future. The limits on the incompatible pollutants will be based on not only chronic and acute toxicity but also protection of the wastewater treatment process, sludge treatment process, and sludge disposal. Information regarding the treatment plant design will probably be needed from you before these limits can be set. This evaluation may result in pretreatment limits being placed on the industries discharging the incompatible pollutants but should not affect the design of the treatment facility. Phone: (612) 296 -7204 1935 West County Road R2, Roseville, Minnesota 551 13 2785 Regional Offices • Duluth: Brainerd Detroit Lznves;Marshal! Rochester E,ca! G,..ortaay .o�sRm Mr. Jim Welday Page 2 UT 11 -a'3 The limits for compatible pollutants must agree with those used in the design of the municipal treatment plant. Neither the Facilities Plan or Pretreatment Program can be approved until they are consistent. If you have any questions on the above please contact Mr. David L. Axtmann at (612)296 -7204. Sid e els , f � John E. Supervis.,-, E �ineerin- Unit Technic.-_ - e-iew Sectic- Division of :•,ater Qua1_ty G W/DLAX:njm Enclosure cc: The ;r. n-arle J=es DeMeyer, Mayor, City of Hutchinson Hutch_nson City Council, c/o Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator • • FOR YOUR INFORMATION Oct. 8. 1983 I dont mind the raise,Eut when the city first started to pickup gardage they sent us a letter stating if it would be a hard ship on senior citizens to pay the full price we were to send it back.What hapened with that.We live on a fix income.Last week we revived a letter from the city that we have to pay for street inppovment and they wont all the seniors citizens to live in there own home as long as they can. On Sep.22 I pulled out 4 tomatoe vines and insted of puting them in the gardage can i put them along side of the can and when the man drove up I waited forf him and went out to throw them in the small truck and he said to me he wasant going to take them Iasked him why he said that I was suppose to have them tied in a bundel I said I know that but I dint expect him to throw them on I wws going to.11ad the fork standing along side of the garage he said that dint make any differanc he just was going to let me throw them in the truck all the while he said telling me about all rules I had them loaded 2 little piles he got datn smart with me. I just came home from the hospital after a aperation but I still loaded the vines.I am reel carful what I put in the gardage cans and I got them on the side of the garage with a cover on them so they dont fill up with water when it raines,I told him that I was going to call the city hall and talk to mr junker and he said that he was mr junked I dint know him. I dont wont to complain but when a man wont to be good to some one he gets kicked in the face. )ont know who to send this to. )6A,fl Alfred J vicha 141 5th sue N.E. Hutchinson N �STIg� ea SZ 0 0 CENTRAL PRAIRIE RAILWAY ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 81 Hutchinson, MN 55350 OP JQ - October, 1983 - F®-f) 1,04 i147 Vz 1041� YOUR BUSINESS IS AN ESSENTIAL ASSET TO THE CMZYRAL PRAIRIE RAILWAY ASSOCIATION THE CENTRAL PRAIRIE RAILWAY ASSOCIATION IS AN ESSENTIAL ASSET TO YOUR BUSINESS. In February 1981, the Agri - Business Committee of the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce began the early steps to save Burlington Northern service between Hutchinson and Wayzata by forming a Task Force. They gathered information from users along the line and presented their findings to Burlington Northern. These findings clearly indicated that the line was viable. However, reclassification in the spring of 1982 put the line in jeopardy of abandonment. The Task Force continued their efforts with Burlington Northern and in the spring of 1983, the line was again classified into a more favorable category, giving us some breathing space% On June 22, 1983, the Task Force incorporated and formed the Central Prairie Railway Association with their prime goal being a pursuit of all avenues to save the line. Many Association members and users are combining their efforts and talents to make everyone aware of the economic advantages to the communities along the line and to seek out other potential users. Former Congressman Ancher Nelson and former County Commissioner Clifford Popp have been recruited to be the Corporation's spokesmen and to act as liaison people between the users and Burlington Northern. Through their efforts and valuable contacts with key people in State and Federal government and Burlington Northern, we believe we will see positive results in the near future. At the present time users are being contacted to fill out a second survey of past, current, and potential use of the railway service. This information will be used by the Department of Transportation and Region 6E in developing data on viability of the continued use of the line. WE URGE YOU to become a member of the Central Prairie Railway Association and add your business clout to the efforts of the Corporation. There are three classifications of membership... Users, Associates, and Governmental. The fee for membership is: User $100.00 Associate 100.00 Governmental 500.00 Please indicate your decision by your check and a letter to the above address. THANK YOU! Ray Zimmerman, President Central Prairie Railway Association To the Hutchinson City ouncil; • MR YOUR INFORMATION• and copy to the Hutchinson Leader; On one of my recent visits to the Citizens Bank where I have been a good or bad patron for 60 or more years I could not believe my eyes that my bank could give up I doz of the best possible parking spaces for their custdmers it would be possible to have after being the main pushers of destroying the old Armory because of the very bad parking condition in their area. Money talks,Politics rule,and we have very nice trees in the public square. A need to be informed citizen OCT 1 2 1983 Public Forum Nutrition for thought To The Egitor: I just beg to make a few comments on the financing of nutrition meals in our country and what better place to start than.right at home. In the first place have our senior citizens ever requested from our elected government that they want nutrition meals to be paid for by the taxpayers of our country? Just who does want the nutrition program? Is it being pushed onto the people by commission -type government that in this area is Region 6E of the Com- munity Action Agency? When about 5 percent of the hundred might need a nutrition meal in Hutchinson, out of approximately 3,000 does that that are announcing the nutrition menus each day when we need loy- alty to the majority of the people in our city and our country? When we are supporting commission -type government in Minnesota that are forcing taxpayers to pay and sup- port programs that benefit less than 5 percent of our people is that de- mocracy or dictatorship? Besides supporting low principles of loyalty to our country in its hour of need the nutrition program is an excellent op- portunity for graft in our society. We have the best country in the world but the least appreciated by our people and the excellent sun- shine in our lives is leaving a shadow in the life of the next generation. show need for emergency funding that has to be paid in part by other Ralpph Coffin senior citizens? 416 A 3rd Ave., S.W. What about pussy -foot news media Hutchinson To whom it may concern= 4g* _11; � -ill cn The undersigned is making an effort to disqualify the funding of a government grant of 823$3,000 for the addition 6f more nutrition meal meals sotu= locations in the Region 6E area of the Community Action Agency for 19$4, I *iy reason is that the program is unneededotrasteful and unamericansdisloyal to ou_° Country and is bordering on dictatorship and taxation without representation. date OCT 111983 r^ i _4 iii'% J Na_; � l .y % r l• y !/ /] t/[/ `u / r uones 0V Controversy developed at Monday night's council meet- ing over a twelve page docu- ment presented to the City Council by the Professional Planning and Development Company of Mankato. The document Is aimed to provide assessment standards for the City of Litchfield and its intent is to give developer guidelines on how the city wants the financing and In- stallation of municipal services In new developments to be handled. In recent years, there has been considerable confusion, and some disagreements be- tween -the council and de- velopers when time comes to put in new streets, water lines, sanitary sewer lines and the like in new residential areas. About six months ago the city commissioned the Pro- fessional Planning and Devel- opment firm out of Mankato to develop an overall policy man- ual governing these situations and Dean Doysher, a member of the firm, presented this document to the council Mon- day night. Doysher recommended that the stipulations of the manual be used as policy guidelines, and not be formed into ordin. ances. With the guidelines set as policy, Doysher said he felt the city would have needed flexibility in dealing with new residential developments. "This will become an im- portant document to the city, and it is a necessary docu- ment;" Doysher commented in presenting the manual. City Attorney George Nep- erud, however, questioned the legal baste of the policy manual developed by Doysher's firm. He recommended that the document take the form of an ordinance to enhance its legal standing, but Doysher took issue with this opinion. Nerpud further stressed that before the manual is adopted even as a policy, it be examined from a legal standpoint. Councilman Ron Ebnet Firstate's raised this question to Attorney Neperud: "We started working on this six months ago when you were present as attorney-- - shouldn't some of these ques- tions you are raising have been brought up then ? ". Neperud responded that he was a part-time attorney and noted he didn't feel a matter like examining the policy manual presented by Doysher was part of his duties under the retainer fee he's paid by the city. I was not asked to do this legal work," Neperud added. Ebner added the comment that "well, here we have what we thought was a finished document - --what do we do with It -- -toss it out the window ?" City Administrator Wayne Carlson suggested that the ac- ceptance of the manual be tabled, "until the city attorney can make his comments and get them down on paper." Carlson added. that he was not aware of the fact that it was necessary to make a specific By Leanne New Editor's Note: This Is Na- tional Business and Profes- sional Women's Week and as a result BPW member Jody Crook is featured In the following article. When Jody Onell Crook took a model office class during her junior year at Litchfield Senior High School ten years ago, she was thinkine about the job she _ firm back in Litchfield. It was then, at just 19, that Jody was appointed manager of the firm's savings office here. "At that time, Firstate Federal in Litchfield was only involved in savings," Jody noted. "In the late 1970's this branch became full service, meaning that we could write loans and offer other added services;' Jody said. _ request of the city attorney to review an agenda item. Mayor Vida Hendrickson noted that "now that we all are thoroughly confused, maybe it's best to table action on this." The action was approved pending further examination of the document by City Admin- istrator Carlson and Attorney Neperud. This discussion out of the way, Doysher took the podium again and outlined to the council in detail, the workings of a tax increment district. The council has received a request from Gerald Kramber to expand the boundaries of the present tax increment district which embraces the new apart- ment complex at the northwest outskirts of town to include a portion of the Pleasant View Estates development. Tax increment revenues in the proposed expansion area would be used for storm sewer development, looping of water mains and park development. Doysher told the connefl these are valid uses of incre- ment financing and a hearing on expanding the tax increment district was set for the council's first meeting In November. An initial hearing date of ,December S was set as a fast step to establishing another tax increment district o ass m iit Hies eve oplimm in the area of the Litchfield Precision Components plant, where a major expansion is slated to start soon. _- -- A major street and drainage improvement - project on East Ripley Street, which has been under the consideration for some time still figures in the city's plan, and City Engineer Joe Bettendorf outlined the present status of this project. Under the plan outlined by Bettendorf Monday night, bi- tuminous surfacing, along with water main, storm sewer, I 0 0 AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1983 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Consideration of Assessment Roll No. 170 - Project 83 -07 Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve assessment roll - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution 3. Adjournment YUriL1J.h C.0 ZP-Tet r1Uii.tlil�i7[`�liEAll @; 1f� "HU "11:n1NSON, !$1I I�_".SU1A, UN lUEJllATj SEPTEMBER 27TH, 1983 PUBLICATION NO. 3133 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 170 Hutchinson, Minnesota September 26th, 1983 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 7:30 P.M. on the 17th day of October, 1983, in the Elementary School Auditorium (use southeast entrance), at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Lakewood Drive from South City Limits to North Termini Sibley Avenue from Lakewood Drive to Roberts Road Roberts Road South from Sibley Avenue to South Termini Roberts Road from Sibley Avenue to Dale Street Jackson Street from McDonald Drive to Roberts Road Lakeview Lane from McDonald Drive to School Road McDonald Drive from School Road to 1600' West School Road from South Grade Road to T.H. 7 Boulder Street from Roberts Road to School Road Stoney Point Road from Roberts Road to School Road Alan Street from Roberts Road to School Road Circle Drive from Alan Street to South Termini Ray Street from Lea Avenue to South Termini Lea Avenue from Alan Street to Larson Street Larson Street from Lewis Avenue to South Termini Roe Avenue from Larson Street to Charles Street Charles Street from Lewis Avenue to Roe Avenue Lewis Avenue from Dale Street to West Termini Lake Street from 2nd Avenue S.W. to Roberts Road Goebel Street from Milwaukee Avenue to South Termini Milwaukee Avenue from East Line Town & Country Estates to 300' East of Merrill Street Goebel Circle from Roberts Road to South Termini Thomas Avenue from Dale Street to Lake Street Osgood Avenue from Fischer Street to Lake Street Hayden Avenue from Fischer Street to Lake Street Fischer Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to Hayden Avenue Fifth Avenue S.W. from Fischer Street to Dale Street Second Avenue S.W. from Lake Street to Main Street Dale Street from Second Avenue S.W. to South City Limits South Grade Road from School Road to Lynn Road Neal Avenue from Dale Street to Sunset Street Keith Street from South Grade Road to Neal Avenue Steven Street from South Grade Road to Neal Avenue Craig Avenue from Sunset Street to West Termini Laura Avenue from Sunset Street to West Termini Sunset Street from South Grade Road to Southview Drive Harrington Street from South Grade Road to Linden Avenue PUBLICATION NO. 3133 Church Street frcoouth Grade Road to Linden Avo Merrill Street from South Grade Road to Linden Avenue Clinton Avenue from Harrington Street to Lynn Road Lyndale Avenue from Merrill Street to Lynn Road Southview Drive from Sunset Street to Linden Avenue Southview Court from Sunset Street to Linden Avenue Juul Road from Dale Street to Lynn Road Fifth Avenue S.W. from Dale Street to Merrill Street Juergens Road from Merrill Street to Lynn Road Fourth Avenue S.W. from Dale Street to Lynn Road Third Avenue S.W. from Lynn Road to West Termini Pishney Lane from Third Avenue S.W. to Second Avenue S.W. East Pishney Lane from Third Avenue S.W. to South Termini West Pishney Lane from Third Avenue S.W. to South Termini Harmony Lane from Second Avenue S.W. to Lynn Road Lincoln Avenue from Harmony Lane to Lynn Road Lynn Road from Washington Avenue to South Grade Road Fifth Avenue S.W. from Lynn Road to Main Street Fourth Avenue S.W. from Lynn Road to Main Street Third Avenue S.W. from Glen Street to Franklin Street Grove Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to North Termini Glen Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to Third Avenue S.W. Glen Street from Second Avenue S.W. to North Termini Franklin Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to Second Ave. N.W. Cedar Avenue from Glen Street to West Termini First Avenue N.W. from Main Street to West Termini Second Avenue N.W. from Main Street to Franklin Street Washington Avenue from Lynn Road to Main Street First Avenue S.W. from Main Street to Glen Street Century Avenue from T.H. 15 to West Termini Boston Street from Century Avenue to Baltimore Avenue Atlanta Avenue from T.H. 15 to Boston Street Baltimore Avenue from T.A. 15 to Boston Street Linden Avenue from Dale Street to Lynn Road Church Street from Linden Avenue to Miller Avenue Miller Avenue from Lynn Road to Harrington Street Harrington Street from Linden Avenue to Fourth Avenue S.W. Century Avenue from T.H. 15 to Jefferson Street Freemont Avenue from Oakland Avenue to Century Avenue Bradford Street from Sherwood Street to South Termini Echo Drive from Oakland Avenue to Freemont Avenue Sherwood Street from Jorgenson Street to South Termini Echo Circle from Echo Drive to East Termini Randall Road from Bradford Street to Century Avenue Jorgenson Street from Century Avenue to Hassan Street Oak Lane from Jorgenson Street to East Termini Sherwood Circle from Jorgenson Street to East Termini Selchow Avenue from Jorgenson Street to Jefferson Street Hassan Street South from Selchow Avenue to Washington Avenue Oakland Avenue & Service Road from Century Avenue to T.H. 22 Main Street South from Oakland Avenue to Washington Avenue T.H. 15 South from Main Street to South City Limits Jefferson Street from South City Limits to Washington Avenue Ivy Lane from Oakland Avenue to Sixth Avenue Seventh Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Hassan Street Sixth Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Jefferson Street Fifth Avenue S.E. from Main Street to East Termini Fourth Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Ontario Street F4 PUBLICATION NO. 3133 Third Avenue &• from Main Street to Ontario reet Second Avenue E. from Main Street to Michig Avenue First Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Huron Street Washington Avenue from Main Street to Monroe Street First Avenue N.E. from Main Street to Bluff Street Second Avenue N.E. from Main Street to East Termini Hassan Street from Washington Avenue to Second Avenue N.E. Jefferson Street from Washington Avenue to First Avenue N.E. Adams Street & T.A. 22 from Washington Avenue to South City Limits Monroe Street from Fair Avenue to Washington Avenue Fair Avenue from Jefferson Street to Monroe Street Erie Street from First Avenue S.E. to South Termini Huron Street from First Avenue S.E. to South Termini Ontario Street from Second Avenue S.E. to Fourth Avenue S.E. Arch Street from High Street to East Termini Michigan Street from High Street to East Termini Hilltop Drive from Pauls Road to Garden Drive Lindy Lane from Pauls Road to 500' East of Garden Drive Garden Drive from T.H. 7 to Hilltop Drive Mark Drive from Lindy Lane to Hilltop Drive Pauls Road from Lindy Lane to Hilltop Drive Fourth Avenue N.E. from Main Street to High Street High Street from Fourth Avenue N.E. to Fifth Avenue N.E. Gauger Street from T.H. 7 to East Termini T.H. 7 from East City Limits to West City Limits Fifth Avenue N.E. from High Street to Main Street Bluff Street from Washington Avenue to North City Limits East Highland Park Drive from Service Road to North Termini Highland Park Drive Service Road Prospect Street from T.H. 7 to McLeod Avenue Main Street North from Washington Avenue to North City Limits Glen Street from Third Avenue N.W. to Fifth Avenue N.W. James Street from Third Avenue N.W. to Fifth Avenue N.W. Water Street from Third Avenue N.W. to Fifth Avenue N.W. Lind Street from Fourth Avenue N.W. to Railroad Third Avenue N.W. from Main Street to T.H. 7 Rouwe Street from Fourth Avenue N.W. to Fifth Avenue N.W. Fifth Avenue N.W. (C.R. 12) from Main Street to West City Limits Ludtke Lane in Johnson Court Oakwood Lane in Oakwood Addition Rose Lane in Johnson's Terrace McLeod Avenue & Sixth Avenue N.E. from Main Street to East Termini Peterson Circle in Peterson's Terrace Waller Drive from Sixth Avenue N.E. to Bluff Street Clark Street from Fifth Avenue N.E. to Sixth Avenue N.E. Carlisle Street from Sixth Avenue N.E. to South Termini Spruce Court North of Sixth Avenue N.E. Hillcrest Road from Sixth Avenue N.E. to North Termini College Avenue from Main Street to Hillcrest Road Griffin Avenue from Main Street to Maple Street Northwoods Avenue from Main Street to East Termini Ninth Avenue from Main Street to Elm Street Tenth Avenue from Eleventh Avenue to Maple Street Eleventh Avenue from Main Street to Maple Street North High Drive (C.R. 76) from East City Limits to West City Limits East Main Street Service Drive from Griffin Avenue to Northwoods Avenue West Main Street Service Drive from College Avenue to Fifth Avenue N.W. Oak Street from McLeod Avenue to Ninth Avenue 3 PUBLICATION NO. 3133 Elm Street from seod Avenue to North High Drive Ash Street from McLeod Avenue to Northwoods Avenue Maple Street from College Avenue to North High Drive Spruce Street from College Avenue to Northwoods Avenue T.H. 7 Service Road from School Road to Les Rouba Parkway Les Rouba Parkway from T.H. 7 to Third Avenue N.W. California Street from T.H. 7 to School Road North School Road North from T.H. 7 to County Road 12 Seventh Avenue N.W. from School Road to Shady Ridge Road Rolling Oaks Lane from School Road to West Termini Shady Ridge Road from T.H. 7 to North Termini Hilltop Lane from Shady Ridge Road to West Termini Connecticut Street from Campbell Lane to South Termini Campbell Lane from Shady Ridge Road to Connecticut Street Delaware Street from T.H. 7 to South Termini Florida Street from T.H. 7 to North Termini Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to North Termini by the construction of Grading, Graveling, Oiling or Otherwise Improving and Maintaining same for 1984, 1985, 1986 and 1987. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at my office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting, but the Council may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any individual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. 1 Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral or payment of this special assessment on his property. The total cost of the improvement is $500,000. ZAUGary D. B %4— inistrator 4 �L 4 � ,•'AIL/ -�-c� �� `�'� 2'L,��.s4 -.�L 3 ,fiecL?F�S> � • U 9� OCT 1983 �f RECEIVF -D �L 4 � ,•'AIL/ -�-c� �� `�'� 2'L,��.s4 -.�L 3 ,fiecL?F�S> � • U • w2ip5 4 9t4% o OCT7983 / N RECEIVED m y L. Z-0-� . '- Z, c� W Fob. es, EDNA TNRAN II 553 PROSPECT ST. HUTCHINSON• HIM. 55350 T WEB OFFSET PRINTERS COMMERCIAL JOB PRINTERS a COMPLETE TYPOGRAPHY SERVICES 'row River Press, Inc. 170 SHADY RIDGE ROAD a P.O. BOX 99 s HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 October 7, 1983 Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Gary: lf' N� o r� DAVID THEIS, General Manager Telephone: (612) 587 -2062 ry OCT1983 m RECEIVED Enclosing copies recently received concerning street maintenance improvements. Is the assessment figure for Lot 1 correct. Lots 2 & 3 assessment figures are 10% of benefited frontage. Sincerely, TENPART CO. w David Theis OFFICERS Dennis Baker, President David Theis, Secretary James Deis, Treasurer DIRECTORS Arlin Albrecht Dennis Baker James Bernath H.W. Cutten James Deis Vernon Madson David Theis Charles Warner 11587-5157 4W ' CITY OF HUTCHINSON ,c _= 170 SHADY RIDGE RD HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 September 30, 1983 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2793.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160180 PROPERTY DESCRIPTI BLOCK 1 ADD. The above assessment figures are not payable until after the adoption of the Assessment Roll by the City Council. September 30, 1983 TENPART CO % DAVE THEIS BOX 99 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 0 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2793.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160180 (612) 587.5151 imm CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 September 30, 1983 1305 HWY 7W HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2794.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160181 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 2 BLOCK 1 TENPART ADD. PROJECT NO. 83 -07 - STREET MAINTENANCE BENEFITED ASSESSMENT PAYABLE IN TYPE OF STREET FRONTAGE 1984 1985 1986 1987 Cl 145.80 $14.58 $14.58 $14.58 $14.58 The above assessment figures are not payable until after the adoption of the Assessment Roll by the City Council. September 30, 1983 TENPART CO DAVE THEISS BOX 99 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2794.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160181 587 -5151 i CITY OF HUTCHINSON September 30, 1983 1301 HWY 7W HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2795.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160182 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: LOT 3 BLOCK 1 TENPART ADD. PROJECT NO. 83 -07 - STREET MAINTENANCE BENEFITED ASSESSMENT PAYABLE IN TYPE OF STREET FRONTAGE 1984 1985 1986 1987 Cl 146.63 $14.66 $14.66 $14.66 $14.66 The above assessment figures are not payable until after the adoption of the Assessment Roll by the City Council. September 30, 1983 TENPART CO % DAVE THEIS Box 99 PRELIMINARY NOTICE 1983 IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENT ROLL NO.170 COUNTY PARCEL NO. 2795.000 CITY PARCEL NO. 3511730160182