cp11-10-86 cHUTCHINSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
November 9 T 0 November 15�
-1986'
WEDNESDAY
-12-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Hall
Td WAY
VETERANS DAY
Closq,
All City Offices
IL
jar ::k 1 Ft s•, 7 > s
r
r;
w
THURSDAY
-13-
6:30 P.M. - Hutchinson Community
Energy Council Meet-
ing at City Hall
7:30 P.M. - City Council.
Meeting at City
Hall
FRIDAY
-14-
VACATION:
KEN MERRILL - November 10
SATURDAY
-15-
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1986
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Father Peter Zafe, St. Anastasia Catholic Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of October 28, 1986
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Building Official's Report - October 1986
2. Hospital Board Minutes of September 18, 1986
(b) Snow Removal Permits:
1. Gene Betker
2. Del Crotteau - C & C Snow Removal
3. Lloyd Christensen
4. Jamie Emans
•
S.
6.
7.
B.
9.
10.
Dick Ewert
Jim Haasl
Calvin Johnson
Mark Shoutz
Richard Smykalski
Florian Thode
Action - Motion to order minutes and report filed and issue permits
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
None
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Consideration of Replacement Drainage for Affected Property At
Maplewood Academy
Action -
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Ordinance No. 25/86 - Ordi
Ordinance Code Of The City
Adding Subdivision No. 21
• Regulations"
Action - Motion to reject
nance Amending Section 710:10 of the 1974
Of Hutchinson, Entitled "Stop Streets" By
- No. 24 Thereto, Relative To "Traffic, Local
Motion to waive second reading and adopt
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 10, 1986
(b) Resolution No. 8415 - Resolution Determining The Necessity For And 40
Authorizing The Acquisition Of Certain Property By Proceedings In
Eminent Domain
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(c) Resolution No. 8416 - Resolution for Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(d) Resolution No. 8417 - Transferring $20,000 from Liquor Store to
General Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(e) Resolution No. 8418 - Resolution Appointing City Administrator As
Contact Person For Sewage Treatment Plant Construction Grant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Deferred Assessments
Action - 0
(b) Consideration of Subdivision Agreement for Santelman's Second Addition
(DEFERRED OCTOBER 14, 1986)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve subdivision agreement
(c) Consideration of Setting Assessment Hearing Date for Project No. 86 -14,
Assessment Roll No. 223
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to set hearing date for Assessment
Roll No. 223 - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
(d) Discussion of Strengthening Control of Junk Cars By Ordinance
(DEFERRED OCTOBER 28, 1986)
Action -
(e) Consideration of Highway 15 South Improvement - Project No. 87 -06
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve project - Motion to waive
reading and adopt Resolution
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) Consideration of
Replacing
Microwave Oven for
Senior Center
Action - Motion
to reject
- Motion to approve
request
rA
•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 10, 1986
(b) Consideration of Subdivision Agreement for Campbell Lake Addition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve subdivision agreement
(c) Consideration of Authorizing Installation of Fan And Blower for
Aeration At Water Plant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve installation
(d) Consideration of Disbursement of Forestry Revenue
Action -
(e) Consideration of Appointing Charles Bailly & Company As 1986 Auditors
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve appointment and enter
into contract
(f) Consideration of Fire Hydrants
Action -
(g) Consideration of Electro Watchman Agreements for Sewer And Water
• Department and Our Savior Lift Station
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and sign agreements
(h) Consideration of Amending Dental Insurance Coverage To Include 25 -Year
Old Students
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve amendment
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
0
3
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• TUESDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1986
i. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Mar-
lin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Mikulecky and Mayor Paul L. Ackland. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering Marlow Y.
Priebe, and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the bid openings of October 13 and 21, 1986 and regular meet-
ing of October 14, 1986 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - SEPTEMBER 1986
2. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 6, 1986
• 3. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 1986
4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to order the minutes and report filed.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) MN /DOT HIGHWAY 15 SOUTH IMPROVEMENT - PROJECT NO. 87 -06
Mayor Ackland adjourned the meeting at 8:00 P.M. to reconvene in the
City Hall Auditorium at 8 :10 P.M., at which time he read Publication
No. 3626.
Mr. Gene Setrum of MN /DOT reviewed the background of the 1984 plan
for the Highway 15 South improvement project which had been presented
to the Council for approval and some changes were subsequently made.
He then commented on the revised plan and showed on the wall map
where entrances and turn lanes would be added. Mr. Setrum explained
the method for determining the City and State costs for the project.
He reported the project would be let for bids in July 1987 and start
construction in 1988.
Mr. Dick Lennes, representing HAVTI, asked which streets would be closed
during construction and the accessibility to various areas. He was
. told there might be a two -week period during which the road would be
closed; however, there would be access by some other means.
1
N
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
•
Atty. Bill Haas, 102 Main Street South, questioned how Main Street
would be rated after it was resurfaced. He was told it would become a
10 -ton roadway. Mr. Haas then asked if the character of the road would
be changed or just have a different surface. MN /DOT responded that the
street width would remain the same, ie., a two lane roadway. At pres-
ent the downtown area is restricted to seven ton, but it would become a
10 -ton street and increase the load capacity. Atty. Haas then ques-
tioned if there were a need to resurface the street other than to do
the project. He felt the surface was adequate at the present time and
did not need to be resurfaced. Mr. Setrum pointed out there would be
a gap that would not allow the trucks to move through town. MN /DOT
did not want to come back in a few years to complete a small stretch of
roadway. Mr. Haas stated Seventh to Fifth was for truck traffic. It
was his opinion that the road was being upgraded for service of the
highway and not for the benefit of the area or property owners. He,
therefore, did not favor the resurfacing of the Main Street area be-
cause it was not for the benefit of the property owners in that area,
but rather to move the traffic on Highway 15 South.
Mr. Setrum stated there would be a three inch overlay which would re-
sult in reducing the shoulder width by one foot. Without replacing
part of the surface to get back to the original grading, DOT would lose
the line of the roadway across the curb and gutter. •
Mayor Ackland stated that the City Council was not in favor of the Main
Street project, but they also did not want to see the Main Street area
done five years from now.
Atty. Haas remarked the City would have to prove a need and benefit if
the project was questioned. The improvement was to the commercial
property to the south. It could not be considered a City street or
residential street but rather a highway designed to service the entire
City. Therefore, it was not unreasonable to ask the entire City to pay
for the assessment.
City Engineer Priebe reported he had broken down the project into nine
different letters to address the individual property owner's situation.
An unidentified lady inquired if the City would assess for benefit to
the property owner. Six months out of the year she cannot use her
front lot due to no parking. Also, the City snow plows blow snow back
onto the sidewalk so that it has to be cleaned frequently. The highway
did not benefit her, but the alley was her main roadway for traveling.
She also inquired about the plans for a by -pass around the City.
Engineer Priebe commented the State abandoned the by -pass in 1967.
Mr. Mark Keehr, 726 Main Street South, stated he had a tree that might •
be removed because of the project and wondered if it would be necessary
to take it out. He questioned if the road had to be widened at that
point. Mr. Keehr commented on the Highway 7 West project and asked if
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
• reducing the speed on the Highway 15 South curve would be considered.
Mr. Gene Setrum reported the first two trees on the corner would be
affected by the construction. The design speed would come down to
30 -35 m.p.h. because of the restrictions put there.
Ms. Janel Reiter, Hutchinson Mall Coordinator, inquired what provision
would be made to continue the traffic flow to and from the Mall. She
also asked what portion would be Mall expense.
Mr. Setrum stated that alternate traffic routes would be provided. A
frontage road and construction of lanes would be considered.
City Engineer Priebe remarked that the cost had not been determined.
The final cost to the City would be relative to the area, and the sub-
division agreement with Developers Diversified regarding what portion
can be assessed will be reviewed. He stated the assessment hearing
would be held after the State had taken bids and notified the City of
its costs for the project. They would not be acquiring any new right -
of -way for building.
Mr. Mary Gieseke of MN /DOT commented the street would be in better con-
dition than before when it is used for a service road.
• Mr. Roger Lund, a representative of Edna Lund at 1016 Hwy. 15 South,
commented that no sidewalk was previously mentioned. He wondered what
benefit the sidewalk would be when people walk on the other side of the
road. He questioned why the sidewalk wasn't on the median.
An unidentified lady stated she owned property from South Grade Road to
the Mall entrance. She wondered who would clean off the snow from the
proposed sidewalk.
A gentleman who lived on Main Street South asked for a reason to widen the
street and go around the bend on Main Street. The proposed street
would cut into the existing service road. He pointed out that the
speed limit drops from 40 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. in this area. He felt
the street was wide enough and did not want his frontage reduced. At
present the snow plow throws slush up onto his house. It was his sug-
gestion to slow down the traffic.
Mr. Setrum responded the intent of the design was to slow the traffic
down by dividing the traffic. The speed is based on the car ahead of
it. He stated there was no problem on the curve after Seventh Avenue
to Franklin Street for passing, other than the speed limit. The new
bridge would reduce the amount of truck traffic through the downtown
area.
Ms. Darlene Murphy, 827 Main Street South, reported she was losing a
. street due to the highway design and questioned if this could be done.
She would have a boulevard but no street.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
Mr. Mark Schnobrich, City Forester, asked if the trees could be saved
by eliminating the median. He also inquired if the trees involved at
the South Grade Road and Century Avenue medians would be removed or
saved.
Mayor Ackland inquired if at one time the plan had been to have an
entrance onto the highway at Echo Drive. He felt it would take the
pressure off the intersection. Engineer Priebe reported the plan was
removed to eliminate the purchase of property, but perhaps it could be
done at a later date.
Mr. Bob Evans, 516 Main Street South, stated he had owned his property
for 30 years. He did not use Main Street. He had a car totaled out
that was parked in front of his property. Mr. Evans complained about
snow removal along Main Street. He asked what would be involved in the
reconstruction of the street and if he would be assessed.
City Engineer Priebe explained state aid streets and funding available
for the cost of the project.
Mr. Tom Nelson commented he felt it was a good project. Regarding the
cemetery outlet, he thought the traffic should be considered. Also,
the crowning in the road created a problem. The road would have to be
improved to be a 80,000 pound roadway. Mr. Nelson stated the City .
would be wasting money not to do the road properly and extend the proj-
ect to Main Street South.
Following extensive discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to close the
hearing at 10:16 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and car-
ried unanimously. No action was taken on the project.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
REGARDING SPECIAL EVENTS IN LIBRARY SQUARE DURING HOLIDAY SEASON
Ms. Carol Haukos outlined the proposed special events for the holiday
season to be held in Library Square and the cost for each event. She
requested approval from the City to allow the events to take place in
Library Square, to have the Parks and Recreation Department coordinate
the events, and to provide funding to the Association to help defray
some of the costs of the projects.
During discussion, it was pointed out that the City cannot own a nativ-
ity scene. Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the special events and
$750 for the purchase of lights for the two spruce trees facing Main
Street. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, •
that the Parks and Recreation Department be responsible for the light-
ing and that the lights be City- owned. Motion carried unanimously.
4
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT ON THIRD AVENUE NORTHWEST
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the request
and refer it to the Hutchinson Utilities. Motion seconded by Alderman
Carls and unanimously carried.
(c) UPDATE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT BY DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES
Mr. Jim Miller of Donohue & Associates presented an update on the
wastewater treatment plant project. He reported on a reduction of Step
III engineering fees due to the removal of the filters from the plan
and specifications, an amendment to Step II Engineering Agreement for
increased costs, and the establishment of an advertisement date in mid
December with bid opening in late January and construction start by
April 1, 1987.
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve Amendment No. 1
to Step II Engineering Agreement increasing the City's cost from $633,-
000 to $657,000. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
Alderman Carls moved to approve the Engineering Agreement for Step III
Construction and Operation Related Services with the new figure quoted
• by Donohue for a reduction to the City of $1,054,000 (including a fixed
fee of $128,000). Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unani-
mously.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to proceed with the next step of preparing the plans and specifications
for advertising for bids, with a cap of $30,000. Motion unanimously
carried.
Mr. Miller commented that there would be an upper limit of an addi-
tional $3,000 cost to finalize the draft grant package for grant ap-
proval by November 24. This cost would be non - fundable from MPCA.
Following discussion, no action was taken by the Council.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 8412 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8412.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF APPRAISALS FOR EMMA LAKE PROPERTY (DEFERRED 10- 14 -86)
• Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to authorize advertising
for bids to remove or demolish the house at 115 Franklin North. Motion
seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
60
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
(b) CONSIDERATION OF WATER SUPPLY TO GOPHER CAMPFIRE SANCTUARY
(DEFERRED OCTOBER 14, 1986)
This agenda item was tabled.
(c) DISCUSSION OF STRENGTHENING CONTROL OF JUNK CARS BY ORDINANCE
(DEFERRED OCTOBER 14, 1986)
Alderman Mlinar moved to defer action. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY FOR EXTRAORDINARY WASTEWATER RELEASES
(EXAMPLE: LACTOSE) (DEFERRED OCTOBER 14, 1986)
Discussion was given to the treating of waste from Hercules and the
cost involved. It was recommended to implement the following policy
regarding waste releases: "The City shall be reimbursed the actual
costs of treating the waste; plus fines, if any; plus a surcharge of
$500 or 10% of the (actual cost plus fine), whatever is greater."
Alderman Torgerson moved to accept the policy regarding wastewater re-
leases. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION INCREASING AUTHORITY OF UTILITIES •
COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF A "POWER AUTHORITY" (DEFERRED 10- 14 -86)
Attorney Richard Peterson and Ivan Larson reported on a meeting held
with City staff and bond consultants to discuss the utilities bond
sale. It was pointed out that the proposed Resolution No. 8414 re-
quested bonding authorities beyond what was listed in the City Char-
ter and was for continuous authority for an indefinite period of time.
Attorney Peterson stated that if the Council chose to rescind the auth-
ority given under Resolution No. 8414, it could do so in the future.
Following extensive discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to adopt Reso-
lution No. 8414, Resolution Concurring In Resolution Of Municipal Power
Commission Authorizing The Exercise Of Certain Powers Of A Municipal
Power Agency Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 453.51 to 453.62, ex-
pressly eliminating Minnesota Statute, Section 453.57 referred to in
Minnesota Statute, Section 453.55, Subdivision 8, with the inclusion of
the proposed revision: "except, however, for that part of Minnesota
Statute, Section 453.55, Subdivision 7, which authorizes the sale of
bonds or notes at private sale." Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and carried four to one, with roll call vote of Aldermen Carls, Mlinar,
Torgerson, Mayor Ackland voting aye and Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
(f) DISCUSSION OF AIRPORT APPRAISALS
City Administrator Plotz reported on the appraisals received for the •
airport land. After discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to authorize
the City Administrator to contact the State for advice on proceeding
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR CEMETERY BACKHOE (DEFERRED 10-21 -86)
Director Ralph Neumann reported the low bid from Teply Equipment was
for a 1982 unit which did not meet the specifications. Therefore, it
was his recommendation to award the bid to the second lowest bidder,
Carlson Lake State Equipment Company in the amount of $24,439, less a
$1,000 trade -in.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve and award bid to Carlson Lake State
Equipment Company. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously
carried.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
authorize discontinuation of service on Monday, November 3, 1986 except
where special arrangements were made. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SEWER CHARGES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
• Alderman Mikulecky moved to defer for a revised report. Motion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING NEW MEETING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 11, 1986 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING DUE TO VETERAN'S DAY
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to set
the Council meeting date for Monday, November 10, 1986 at 7:30 P.M.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNS
1. NORTH EXIT OF COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE AND CALIFORNIA STREET
2. SEVENTH AVENUE N.W. AND SCHOOL ROAD
3. EIGHTH AVENUE N.W. AND SCHOOL ROAD
4. ROLLING OAKS LANE AND SCHOOL ROAD
5. NO PARKING SIGN ON SCHOOL ROAD NORTH
Alderman Carls moved to approve the traffic signs and waive first
reading of Ordinance No. 25/86 and set second reading November 10,
1986. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
REQUESTED BY JOHN MILLER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
• COMMISSION
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the final
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
plat and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8413. Motion seconded
by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE SUBMITTED BY KDUZ /KNJR TO COUNTY (WITHIN TWO
MILE RADIUS) WITH NO OBJECTION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson, to recommend to the County with no objection. Mo-
tion unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF MERIT INCREASE REQUESTS FOR SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the recommen-
dations of the Directors. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and car-
ried unanimously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF NAMING EHLERS & ASSOCIATES AS FINANCIAL CONSULTANT
FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT
After discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to solicit proposals from
several financial consultant firms for the wastewater treatment plant
project. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS •
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reported the State had been contacted regard-
ing the Midwest Mobile Home Court. The owner has operated without a
license for some time, and the Department of Health would assist in
closing down the court providing the City notified all occupants that
they had 60 days to move prior to water shut -off in the court. Alder-
man Torgerson moved to authorize the City Administrator to write let-
ters to owners and /or occupants of the court that they have 60 days to
look for a new location or remain if the owner of the court paid the
delinquent water bill. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
Mr. Plotz suggested the Council hold a special meeting to discuss the
1987 budget for enterprise funds, liquor store fund and sewer and water
fund, in addition to a report on the satellite liquor store, the sanc-
tuary well, and Tax Increment District No. 4. It was the consensus of
the Council to meet on November 20, 1986 at 7:00 P.M.
Mention was made that the City Charter Commission wished the City Coun-
cil to attend their next meeting scheduled for Nov ?tuber 19, 1986, at
which time the Commission will be discussing the City Manager's role.
Administrator Plotz requested retroactive permission for officer Ring- •
strom to attend a special course on October 27 -28. The motion was made
by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson, to approve the re-
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
• quest for Police Officer Ringstrom to attend the course. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
Mr. Plotz stated he had contacted MN /DOT regarding the cost for apprai-
sals on the service road property along Highway 7 West, and they could
not give him a price. Alderman Mikulecky moved to direct the City Ad-
ministrator and City Engineer to contact the property owners on Highway
7 West for consideration of the service road easements for a $1.00 do-
nation. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
It was reported that the Mayor, City Attorney, City Administrator, City
Engineer, and Donohue & Associates representative would attend the Has-
san Valley Township meeting at the Biscay Town Hall on October 29 to
discuss the easements required for the new wastewater treatment plant
si te.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar informed the Council that he had talked to Newell Weed
today regarding the Greencastle project. Mr. Weed had shown some will -
ingness to pay for the installation costs of the fire hydrants on the
south and north by the assessment method. The sunken curb and gutter
was being worked on.
• (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson commented he had received a call regarding the
Klockmann property. City Attorney Schaefer reported he was working on
it and waiting for the time limit to expire.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky requested a report from the City Attorney on the
parking appeals from the downtown parking program.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Priebe asked for permission to attend the M.P.W.A. Conference
November 19 -21 in Minneapolis. Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the
request. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland stated the City Attorney had determined the City Council
could hold a closed meeting to discuss how to proceed with the police
station situation. The date of October 30, 1986 at 5:15 P.M. was es-
tablished for the meeting, 4ith the Council members, City Administrator
and City Attorney in attendance.
• 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
•
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds.
Motion unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:03 A.M.
•
•
L
0
•
•
�alpaA ONE ra. aasrntw. Asst, Ewms 0. . hew
Vanua C-44
per is which
WAS",
sanNts Issued
PLEASE MAIL ON Oft THE 4TH DAY O9 THE MONTH
Y.a eaae ae f«a census t
au
REPORT OF BUILDING OR ZONING
iPlanamwotwy«rwmamwwarwaf
PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL
PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION
103500 27 8 9999 0811 1 0
1 26 9999 02730
CENSUS USE ONLY
HOVER PITTNAM BLDG OFF
CITY MALL 37 WISMINETON AVE MELT
NUTCHINSON NN 35350
Has the paugrell severMe of this Steel;
syat" changed deris0 this sealed?
® No ❑ Yes — Explain in comments
If M permits we Issued dorinp %is
MAIL Bureau of the Causes
lease mad the instructions before
sealed, eater (I) in box and :grim
f0"a ❑
COPY TO 1201 1201 East Tooth Streat
omPleting form. For further help.
3afiersoovillo Ind. 47132
call collect (301) 763 -7244.
Section I — NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSE-
I PRIVATELY
VEXED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
KEEPING BUILDINGS AND
Ian's
Nu"
valuation of
NueAW
vainum of
Nina
XewhN
sul
MOBILE HOMES
an
contraction
�
NI
hl
?
Want
(4)
IN
fN
1 1
One - family houses, detached
101
6
1 6
389,176
One - family houses attached, each unit
separated from adjoining unit(s) by a
wall that extends from ground to roof
102
Twc.fx - -.11y buildings
103
Three- and four - family buildings
101
• ive -.rmme faoiily buildings
105
TOTAL (Sum of 101 -105)
1091
6
6
389,176
Mobile homes
112
-- - - - --
Section 11 — NEW RESIDENTIAL NON-
I PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
HOUSEKEEPING
Itau
Noma
VmaNlanw
NmASr
Vmuatbn of
BUILDINGS
Nd
Roans
(o�natro.naj
ildirys
Room
(Ven cons)
s)s)
(s)
(bl
10
td)
tot
m
11
Hotels, motels, and tourist cabins
intended for transient accommodations
213
Other nonhousekeeping shelter
214
Section III — NEW NONRESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY
OWNED
Pusucky
OWNED
BUILDINGS
Na
Nuft
ValwOOnof
NipWer
Valuation of
Ildl na
ous.
unity
Build
ant
wnlr
conabumion
faaYt anal
(saturation
!Darr osnrsl
(a)
lbl
lc1
Ih�l
lal
10
(tl
Amusement and recreational buildings
318
Churches and other religious buildings
319
Industrial buildings
320
Parking rarares (open to general public)
321
1
Service stations and repair laraZes
322
Hos itaIs and other institutional buildings
3
ORice, bank, and Professional buildings
324
Public works and utilities buildings
325':'":'..
Schools and other educational buildings
326
,' *';..°
and other mercantile buildings
.._
327
'c. VAI'Idinngs
32B
_
IV �IID
- -i AL IERA110NS
Pn in, ire.., n' 'ho number of Lousing
-
.. units (in the housing units column,
c n enter only the number of additional
'a r units)
433
^
No change in the number of
'+
a «
housing units
434
—c
A decrease in the number of housing
o ^
units (in the housing units column,
enter only the number of decreased
units)
435
Residential garages and cwporus
(attached and detached)
436
•e.
All other buildings and structures
437
4
34,550
1
?' - `
800
—o.Vua PLEASE CONTRNIE OR REVSW DOE �►
38 Permits — $460,309.00 Total Valuation
4Q(s)
Settle. V — CONVERSIONS
PRIVATELY OONIO
PUBLICLY OEM
VNuallen of
Nu.Mr
Yalualler of
ion^
Na.
ulldmil.
Noral
IldMga
R.-H,17ft
eenabYtllon
conatructlM
fOVrlr
enita
(a)
Ibl
fit)
le)
(1)
(11
Nonresidential and nonhousekeeping
buildings to housekeeping buildings
540
Housekeeping buildings to nonresidential
and nonhousekeeping buildings
541
Sates.. VI — DEMOLITIONS AND
RAZING OF BUILDINGS
One- family buildings attached
and detached 1 P
St
645
2
2
-'•
- ->•„
Two - family buildings
616
Three- and four - family buildings
647
Five -or -more family buildings
618
All other buildings and structures
649
Section VII — ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS OF $500,000 OR MORE
Please provide in the space below, additional information for each individual permit valued at 5500,000 or more
entered in sections I through V.
tin"
Name aM address of
Ownership
Valuati n of
Number of
humor
S.C.
fOp
Description
pWMI p builder
Me /h (X)
construction
housing
of
I —V
pne
romf.1.)
units
buildings
lal
111
(c)
Id)
let
I0
(a)
Kind of building
------------------------
❑Private
___
Lk address
______ ________
❑Public
f
Kind of Wilding
_______________________
❑Private
Site addles.
add
------------------------
❑Public
Kind of Wilding
_______________________
❑Private
_____
Site Mdress
_______________________
F1 Public
KIM of building ,
_______________________
E3 Private
Site address
_______________
E] Public
KIM of building
❑Private
---------------------------------------
Site address
❑ Public
Kid of building
_______ ________
C] Private
site address
___________ ____________
❑Public
KiM of building
________
E3 Private
Site address -- ----- - - - - --
ED Public
1I of Wildmg
❑ Private
Site address
❑ Public
Kid of building
_____________
Site address
IEprivate
❑ Public
Comments
Name of person to contact regarding this report
Telephone
code
Number
Extension
Hopei an Hopi Pittm iluea
Title
Building Official
61
7111
vo•� uo. a -ns.:
•
•
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
• REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - September 18, 1986
Large Conference Room - 5:15 PM
Present: Rev. Thor Skeie, President; Joan Ewald, Vice President;
Rolly Balke, Secretary; Mike Carls, Trustee; Dori Johnson,
Trustee; Dr. Carl Bretzke, Chief of Staff
Absent: Bob Durfee, Trustee
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, ADministrator; Willard H. Rosenow;
Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Frank Seivert, Director
of Finance; Jane Hodgins, Hutchinson Leader; Virginia Penk, KDUZ /KKJR
Radio; Sherrie Krueger, Recording Secretary
Prior to the regular board meeting Graves reviewed with the trustees
the proposed 1987 institutional objectives. He compared the listing
of priorities that the Department Heads had developed at their retreat
earlier in the day with the listing that the trustees had developed
at their planning retreat. The objectives were reviewed individually,
giving board members opportunity to comment, question or make
changes. All changes that were indicated will be made and the
objectives will be brought before the board for action at their
• October meeting.
The meeting was called to order by President Skeie at 7:00 PM.
Minutes of Past Meeetings. The minutes of the August 19, 1986, regular
board of directors meeting were presented. Skeie asked for an update
on the hospice program. Lien indicated that two speaking engagements to
the community had already been arranged and a training program for volunteers
will be scheduled in late October or early November. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Carls, seconded by Ewald, to approve
as presented the minutes of the August 19, 1986, regular
board of directors meeting. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes. Bretzke presented the minutes of the
September Medical Staff and Executive Committee meetings. He noted
the recommendation from the medical staff to implement the Medical
Management Analysis process, a system of Quality Assurance Data Collection.
Graves indicated that this will be necessary to meet JCAH requirements
and that this will require an additional staff position, which was included
in the budget.
d Business.
Johnson indicated to the board that the hospital auxiliary would be
• appropriating funds for the two capital expenditure requests presented
at the August meeting, those being the purchase of clocks for 44 patient
rooms and the purchase of a biological hood for use when mixing chemotherapy
drugs. The board thanked the Auxiliary for their continued support and
this generous donation. Skeie instructed the recording secretary to
send a letter of thanks to the Auxiliary members.
Page Two Directors Meeting •
Regular Board X986
September 18,
(Continued). from Glencoe
Oldgld B with representatives He exp
Graves hVen t approach for homeregarding e' their
next month
A• !2� the joint for the board at
regarding from them within the
to hear and will have a recommendation
committment members that
that Point' board Dr. John Zenk,
Graves informed the
Dr. Zen" A lication. doing a credentials che"is application
B ital is currently an excelleee °of the Medicalbodrd
the hose Dr. Zenk is doing to the Scott
the Executive .11 be submitted
willistresented t° and then board that Or.
will be P informed the is also being
approval- Graves also application at their October meeting and his aPP rivileges until his
for their egun practicing temporary P
Rysdahl has �s currently on
processed: he is completed.
application P
NewNew B board that
Ex enditures. Graves indicated to the •
A Ca ital does cover the Medical
S stems U date. system
Fire Alarm final fire alaexpanded area, several of the
l• newly Also, replacement
although the °g and the area- Anglin'
Office Building too large an area. Dennis Anfire
fire zones Conseq date the
now unavailable- that we up 1986 budget
Parts are iS recommending in the the °PP°rtunitY
Chief Engineer, was included
system. This item Car Is indicated that bid on this
alarm Y sented• ualif.ed suppliers to
Two bids were pre
for all q
should be given discussion
Following Johnson, to invite
project. Seconded by the fire
alarm
made by Carls. to bid on not to
Motion was, local suppliers the final accepted bid
all qualified cost of the Motion carried.
system, with the All were in favor• board
exceed $4,650. anded
S stem. Graves advised the
S rinkler indicated that the newly exp
if it is to be used for storage
2 Installation of S rinkler systems and
that the Fire Marshall has install P Graves recommended
area must be sprinklered Stem.
in Hutchins bid on this sy and Heating, be
Only two firms Plumbing
they both Were �bid,efrm Krasen
that the lowest discussion:
ted- Following Carls, to accept
accep Ewald, seconded bY. provide a •
made by Plumb. and Hetareato All were
Motion w s Krasen new storage
the bid system
for the
sprinkler Motion carried.
in favor.
•
Page Three
Regular Board of Directors Meeting
September 18, 1986
New Business (Continued).
3. Medical Office Building Parking Lot Improvement. A portion of
the parking lot of the Medical Office Building needs to be
cemented. A list of all qualified bidders in town was obtained
from the City Engineer and all were invited to bid. The tenants
of the Medical Office Building will be paying for this improvement.
Graves recommended acceptance of the bid from Jim Hanson Construction
Company for approximately $8,100 plus bituminous patching.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Carls, seconded by Ewald, to accept
the bid of Jim Hanson Construction Company for Medical
Office Building parking lot improvement. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
B. Privileges for Dr. Wolf. Graves pointed out the recommendation from
the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff regarding privileges
for the active staff for Dr. Tracy Wolf. Dr. Wolf will now have
courtesy privileges at St. Mary's Hospital in Winsted. Graves
indicated that Dr. Wolf is seeking another physician to work with
him in the Dassel area and has made a verbal committment to affiliate
with Hutchinson. Graves informed the board that Meeker County Hospital
in Litchfield is also recruiting very actively for the Dassel area.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Carls, seconded by Ewald, to grant active
staff privileges to Dr. Tracy Wolf. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
C. Health Care Pac. Graves informed the board the MHA is spearheading
their annual PAC (Political Action Committee) drive and has set a goal
of $100 for Hutchinson Hospital. This would be a way for board members
or department heads to make a political contribution, through the PAC.
The board discussed the advantages and disadvantages of Political
Action Committees. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Johnson, seconded by Skeie, that Hutchinson
Community Hospital make a $100 unrestricted donation to
the Health Care Pac. Johnson, Skeie and Ewald were in favor.
Carls voted against. Motion carried.
Statistical Report. The report was presented. The percentage of occupancy
was approximately the same as it was last year at this time. Our
outpatient services continue to show a large increase.
Accounts Payable. The listing of accounts receivable was presented.
• Following discussion:
Motion was made by Ewald, seconded by Carls, to approve for
payment the attached listing of accounts payable and cash
disbursements in the amount of $933,456.45. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
Page Four
Regular Board of Directors Meeting
September 18, 1986
•
Financial Reports. Financial reports for the month of August were
distributed. Operating income for the month was $54,000 with a
gain of $31,000. The Mental Health Unit showed a $600 gain for the
month. Graves noted that receivables are high due to the computer
conversion and that the number of days outstanding will be dropping
again soon.
Departmental Reports.
A. Director of MHU. The report was presented. No unusual comments
were made.
B. Education Coordinator. The report was presented. No unusual
comments were made.
C. Dietitian. The report was presented. No unusual comments
were made.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. Minutes of the August Auxiliary meeting and
Executive Committee meeting were presented. No unusual comments were made.
Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Patient satisfaction surveys received
since the August meeting were distributed and reviewed.
Other.
A. Graves informed the board members that a proposal has been submitted •
to Greencastle condominiums for services. If our proposal is
accepted we would need to add personnel. A slight profit was
"built into" the proposal.
B. Graves also informed board members that our malpractice and general
liability insurance has been increased from $46,000 to $85,000.
C. Thirdly, Graves informed board members that the Leon Boyd lawsuit
will be coming to trial on October 20th.
Adjournment. Motion was made by Carls, seconded by Ewald, to adjourn
the meeting. President Skeie adjourned the meeting at 7:45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Sherrie Krueger Rolly Balke
Recording Secretary Secretary
•
HUTC HnVDC7N OCMINITY HOSPITAL
BUDGET COMPARISONS - NATURAL CATEGORIES
FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1986
ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE
$135,985 $118,811 $ 17,174
43,270 36,795 6,475
379,207 296,795 82,412
$558,462 $452,401 $106,061
YEAR -TO -DATE
Daily Hospital Service
Medical Nursing Units $1,172,103 $1,253,574 $(81,471)
Mental Health Unit 362,661 372,415 (9,754)
Ancillary 3,059,620 2,725,420 334,200
Gross Patient Revenue $4,594,384 $4,351,409 $242,975
62,472) (3,748) (58,724) Less: Discounts & Allowances (238,664) (120,918) (117,746)
495,990 448,653 47,337
26,465 15,419 11,046
$522,455 $464,072 $ 58,383
$266,755 $252,151 $ 14,604
33,889
47,887
(13,998)
5,868
24,058
2,810
,597
9,349
(752)
,138
9,475
8,663
47,186
41,578
5,608
16,864
16,706
158
7,430
6,386
1,044
4,488
3,925
563
12,517
5,418
7,099
2,675
2,949
(274)
20,695
23,435
(2,740)
13,233
8,530
4,703
Net Patient Revenue 4,355,720 4,230,491 125,229
Other Operating Revenue 148,858 141,063 7,795
Total Operating Revenue
Salaries
Employee Benefits
Medical & Other Fees
Raw Food
Drugs
Medical & other Supplies
Utilities
Building & D3uiparent Repairs
Rental Expense
Insurance
Interest
Depreciation
Other Expenses
$4,504,578 $4,371,554 $133,024
$2,280,742
$2,290,965
$(10,223)
396,573
427,887
(31,314)
221,954
233,006
(11,052)
76,640
86,407
(9,767)
120,827
79,795
41,032
433,543
402,574
30,969
144,835
153,755
(8,920)
54,537
64,329
(9,792)
32,330
28,630
3,700
55,307
48,762
6,545
25,516
26,541
(1,025)
175,983
211,315
(35,332)
93,259
109,343
(16,084)
$479,335
$451,847
$ 27,488
Total Operating Expense
$4,112,046
$4,163,309
$(51,263)
43,120
12,225
30,895
Operating Incare
392,532
208,245
184,287
$(23,721) $(23,721) - --
19,399 (11,496) 30,895
•
Add (Deduct)
Non - Operating Revenue (Expense)
Price -Level Depreciation
And Working Capital $(213,489
Excess Revenues over Expenses
213,489) - --
179,043 (5,244) 184,287
1612) 587.5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 5, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ralph Neumann, Maintenance Operations Director
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Snow Removal Permits
------------------------ - - - - --
The following individuals have made application and paid the fee for
snow removal permits:
I�L
1. Gene Betker
2. Del Crotteau - C & C Snow Removal
3. Lloyd Christensen
4. Jamie Emans
5. Dick Ew*ert
6. Jim Haasl
7. Calvin Johnson
8. Mark Shoutz
9. Richard Smykalski
10. Florian Thode
I recommend issuing snow removal permits.
/ms
r�
L_J
BRADFORD & PROCHNOW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
• lib NORTH FRANKLIN STREET - RIVERSIDE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
C JRTIS M. BRADFORD
DANK PROCHNOW
October 30, 1986
Hutchinson City Council
City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
TELEPHONE
16111 5871720
V 1% V ;\
P
19ft o
ar
Re: Maplewood Academy
Dear Council Members:
Please be advised that the undersigned represents
the Maplewood Academy with regard to County Ditch 18. As
you are aware, the City interrupted lateral 1 when it
developed the land east of Highway 15. This obstruction
was committed without a prior hearing or consent of the
• County Board. The City's action has caused significant
damage to the property of Maplewood Academy.
A proposal had been made to connect the affected
Maplewood property to the City's storm sewer. However, it
is now my understanding that this proposal has been tabled.
Demand is hereby made that the City propose, enact, and
construct replacement drainage for the affected property
at the Maplewood Academy. To the extent that the proposal
and enactment are not completed within the next 30 days,
Maplewood Academy will seek appropriate remedies and damages
as permitted by the applicable law.
I look forward to your favorable response.
very truly yours,
BRADFORD & PROCH�NOW
Dan K. Prochnow
DKP:jas
• cc: Lyndon Furst
• ORDINANCE NO. 25/86
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 710:10 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED "STOP STREETS"
BY ADDING SUBDIVISION NO. 21 - NO. 24 THERETO, RELATIVE TO
"TRAFFIC, LOCAL REGULATIONS"
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 710:10 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of
Hutchinson, entitled "Stop Streets" is hereby amended by adding thereto Sub-
division No. 21 - No. 24, which shall be as follows:
Subd. No. 21. That the following named street to -wit:
North Exit of Country Club Terrace at the intersection of
California Street and the same is hereby declared, estab-
lished and made a stop street.
Subd. No. 22. That the following named street to -wit:
Seventh Avenue Northwest at the intersection of School Road
• and the same is hereby declared, established and made a stop
street.
•
Subd. No. 23. That the following named street to -wit:
Eighth Avenue Northwest at the intersection of School Road
and the same is hereby declared, established and made a stop
street.
Subd. No. 24. That the following named street to -wit:
Rolling Oaks Lane at the intersection of School Road and the
same is hereby declared, established and made a stop street.
Section 2. Penalty. Any person violating the provisions of this ordi-
nance shall be guilty of a penal offense and upon conviction shall be pun-
ished by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300) or by imprison-
ment for not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
publication.
Adoptei by the City Council this 10th day of November, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
L. Ackland, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 8415
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
BY PROCEEDINGS IN EMINENT DOMAIN
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore
determined that the City of Hutchinson should construct a
Wastewater Treatment Facility and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore
determined that in order to carry out the purpose described
above, it is necessary to acquire certain easements which
would permit connection of the existing Wastewater Treatment
Facility with the proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
• OF HUTHCINSON, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. Acquisition of an easement by the City over,
on and under the following described property is necessary for
the purpose of construction, erection, operation and
maintenance of underground sanitary sewer /wastewater treatment
force main and undgerground watermain on, along, over,
through, across or under said lands.
a. Parcel one: West 23 feet of Lot 24 of Auditor's Plat of
the West Half of Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29
West, McLeod County, Minnesota; and West 23 feet of Lot 28
of Auditor's Plat of the West Half of Section 5, Township
116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod County, Minnesota.
b. Parcel two: West 23 feet of Lot 30 of Auditor's Plat of
the West Half of Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29
West, McLeod County, Minnesota.
•
7-1-,
f. Parcel six: A 66.00 foot wide strip of land across Lots
9, 10, 12 and 15 of Auditor's Plat of the West Half of
Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said 66.00 foot wide
strip being described as beginning at the Northwest Corner
of said Lot 10; thence South 5 degrees 28 minutes 41
seconds West a distance of 436.46 feet to the Northerly
right -of -way line of the Dakota Rail right -of -way and said
centerline there terminating. (For the purpose of this
description, the West line of said Lot 10 is assumed to
have a bearing of South 0 degrees 44 minutes 18 seconds
West.)
g. Parcel seven: That part of Outlot A in Hutchinson
Industrial District lying East of the following described
c. Parcel three: West 23 feet of Lot 34 of Auditor's Plat of
the West Half of Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29
West, McLeod County, Minnesota; and West 23 feet of the
NA of the NW; of Section 8, Township 116 North, Range 29
West, McLeod County, Minnesota, lying North of State
Highway No. 22.
d. Parcel four: The East 40 feet of the NE; of the NEk of
Section 7, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota lying North of State Highway No. 22.
e. Parcel five: The Easterly 40 feet along the East line of
Section 6, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, commencing
at the Southeast corner of Section 6; thence North 1
degree 50 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 2300 feet
and there terminating said described property being a part
of Lots F and A of Auditor's Plat of the South One -Half
('k) Section 6, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod
•
County, Minnesota.
f. Parcel six: A 66.00 foot wide strip of land across Lots
9, 10, 12 and 15 of Auditor's Plat of the West Half of
Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said 66.00 foot wide
strip being described as beginning at the Northwest Corner
of said Lot 10; thence South 5 degrees 28 minutes 41
seconds West a distance of 436.46 feet to the Northerly
right -of -way line of the Dakota Rail right -of -way and said
centerline there terminating. (For the purpose of this
description, the West line of said Lot 10 is assumed to
have a bearing of South 0 degrees 44 minutes 18 seconds
West.)
g. Parcel seven: That part of Outlot A in Hutchinson
Industrial District lying East of the following described
• line: Beginning at a point on the South Line of Outlot A,
165.00 feet East of the Southwest Corner of Outlot A;
thence North parallel to the West Line of Outlot A to a
point on the Northeasterly Line of Outlot A.
K. Parcel eight: A 66.00 foot wide strip of land across Lots
16, 17 and 18 of Auditor's Plat of the West Half of
Section 5, Township 116 North, Range 29 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said 66.00 foot wide
strip being described as commencing at the West Quarter
Corner of said Section 5; thence South 89 degrees 32
minutes 42 seconds East along the East -West Quarter Line,
a distance of 106.92 feet, thence North 9 degrees 16
minutes 48 seconds East to a point on the North Line of
Lot 16, said line also being the Southerly Right -of -way
line of the Dakota Rail Right -of -way, said point being the
• point of beginning; thence South 9 degrees 16 minutes 48
seconds West to the South line of said Lot 17 and said
centerline there terminating.
2. The City Attorney is authorized and directed
on behalf of the City to acquire said easements to the real
estate above described by the exercise of the power of eminent
domain pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 117, and is
specifically authorized to notify the owners of intent to take
possession pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042.
The City Attorney is further authorized to take all actions
necessary and desirable to carry out the purposes of this
resolution.
Adopted by the City Council this day of
1986.
Mayor Paul Ackland
ATTEST:
•
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 8416
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
•
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Polymer
2845.80
Sludge Treatment
Sewer
Yes
Nalco Chemical
Chemical
B564.00
Mosquito Control
Park
1987
Clark Outdoor
Spraying
- The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
i
Date Approved:
• Motion made by:
Seconded by:
November 10, 1986
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
11
Fund.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8417
TRANSFERRING $20,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT $20,000.00 is hereby transferred by the Liquor Store to the General
Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of November, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
•
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
7— 6;� r
RESOLUTION NO. 8418
• RESOLUTION APPOINTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR AS CONTACT PERSON
FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION GRANT
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Hutchinson, a
municipal corporation, to file applications for federal and state
grants for Construction of the City's wastewater treatment
facilities under EPA's and the Minnesota's Construction Grants
Program; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to designate a representative for
the City in connection with these applications;
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, that the City Administrator, Gary D. Plotz, is desig-
nated as the representative of the City for the purpose of filing
these applications and that he is further authorized and
empowered to do all necessary things and take all necessary steps
in connection with the applications.
THEREFORE, be it further resolved, that the City Adminis-
trator, Gary D. Plotz, maintain the federal and state mandated
records regarding the projects in receipt of federal and state
• grants.
THEREFORE, be it further resolved, the City of Hutchinson
hereby authorizes the filing of an application for the construc-
tion grants to cover a portion of the cost of the construction of
a wastewater treatment facility.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1986.
ATTEST:
C i e r
•
Mayor
7 — ,E,
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
'HINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 10, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
--------------------- --- - - - - --
FROM: Marilyn Swanson, Administrative Secretary
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 26/86
------------------------ - - - - --
After the City Council packet had gone out, it was brought to my attention
40 7 that agenda item 9 -(d) in the October 28, 1986 Council minutes would require
two ordinances instead of only the one listed for "Stop Streets." Therefore,
I have prepared Ordinance No. 26/86 for the "No Parking Sign" on School Road
North and revised the minutes accordingly.
Inasmuch as this sign is already in place, it is important that Ordinance
No. 26/86 be adopted posthaste!
Attachment
0
q'
/
y
REVISED COPY
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
with this issue. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR CEMETERY BACKHOE (DEFERRED 10- 21 -86)
Director Ralph Neumann reported the low bid from Teply Equipment was
for a 1982 unit which did not meet the specifications. Therefore, it
was his recommendation to award the bid to the second lowest bidder,
Carlson Lake State Equipment Company in the amount of $24,439, less a
$1,000 trade -in.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve and award bid to Carlson Lake State
Equipment Company. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously
carried.
9. NEW BUSINESS ='
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
authorize discontinuation of service on Monday, November 3, 1986 except
where special arrangements were made. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SEWER CHARGES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Alderman Mikulecky moved to defer for a revised report. Motion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING NEW MEETING DATE FOR NOVEMBER 11, 1986 CITY
COUNCIL MEETING DUE TO VETERAN'S DAY
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to set
the Council meeting date for Monday, November 10, 1986 at 7:30 P.M.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNS
1. NORTH EXIT OF COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE AND CALIFORNIA STREET
2. SEVENTH AVENUE N.W. AND SCHOOL ROAD
3. EIGHTH AVENUE N.W. AND SCHOOL ROAD
4. ROLLING OAKS LANE AND SCHOOL ROAD
5. NO PARKING SIGN ON SCHOOL ROAD NORTH
Alderman Carls moved to approve the traffic signs, waive first reading
of Ordinances No. 25/86 and No. 26/86, set second reading November 10,
1986. Alderman Torgerson secon e e motion and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
REQUESTED BY JOHN MILLER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the final
7
R
C
0
ORDINANCE NO. 26/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 715:40 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED "TIME LIMIT, PARKING ZONES"
BY ADDING SUBDIVISION NO. 14 THERETO
THE CI'T'Y OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 715:40 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of
Hutchinson is hereby amended with the following additions:
Subd. 14. No vehicle of any kind shall be left standing or parked on
either side of School Road North commencing with the intersection of High-
way 7 West to the intersection of County Road 12 between the hours of 2:00
A.M. and 6:00 A.M. during the period November 1 to May 1.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and
publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of November, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
!'
' (612) 587.5151
f/UTCH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
3i WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MILAN 55350
November 5, 1986
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Deferred Assessments
The city has no written policy on determining costs payable at the
time deferred assessments are activated. I have met with the City
Finance director, and I submit the following:
DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS
When deferred assessments are activated by the City Council the original
• cost plus the interest charged for the bond issues shall be added, not to
exceed the "present day" cost of installing the project.
If the deferred assessment is older than the life of the bond issue,
(bond issues generally being ten (10 years the new principa orlg—lnab
cost plus interest) shall have an additional continuing interest cost
thereafter, of 5% per annum; this is—' to compensate the city for the loss of
interest if the assessment would have been paid off at the end of the bond
issue. In no case shall the principal plus accumulated interest charges
exceed the "present day" cost of installing the improvement project.
r- Q,
•
•
L
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCH/ASON, MINA. 55350 Q
M E M O
DATE: November 4, 1986
TO: City Administrator
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Santelman's Second Addition
I have reviewed the deferred assessments for Santelman's Second Addition, as
per our meeting this date.
A copy of the proposed Subdivision Agreement is attached for your information.
The original costs were as follows:
Roll
No.
58
- $3.95 per lineal
foot -
Michigan St.
Roll
No.
59
- $0.03 per square
foot -
Storm Sewer Only
(Trunk)
Roll
No.
73
- $20.00 per lineal
foot -
Michigan St.
Roll
No.
60
- $12.88 per lineal
foot
- Watermain - Hilltop
Drive & Pauls Rd.
- $13.06 per lineal
foot
- Sanitary Sewer
- Hilltop Drive
Roll
No.
90
- $13.74 per lineal
foot -
Sanitary Sewer
- Paul's Road
Roll
No.
92
- $0.1105 per square foot
- Lateral Storm
Sewer - Service for
Paul's Road Area
A cost comparison on all items is difficult, since we have not had similar projects
in recent years.
Our 1986 street construction cost for grading, gravel base, curb and gutter and
surfacing was $35.47 per lineal foot. This would be the same as for Roll No.
58 and 73. Based on the original cost and a maximum of 10 years interest, the
present cost is as follows:
Roll No. 58
$3.95 plus 0.07 x 10 x 3.95 = 3.95 + 2.77 = $ 6.72
Roll No. 73
$20.00 plus 0.70 x 8 x 20.00 = 20.00 + 11.20 = $31.20
Total - --
$37.92
Based on the above, the actual rates to be used should be as follows:
Roll No. 58 - $ 6.29 per lineal foot
Roll No. 73 - $29.18 per lineal foot
City Administrator
Santelman's Second Addition
November 4, 1986
Page 2
Storm Sewer improvements in new areas the last few years, similar to the project
assessed on Roll No. 59 to Mr. Santelman, have been included with other
improvements. This makes it difficult to make a cost comparison. It is my
opinion that the $0.03 per square foot for Trunk Storm Sewer on Roll No. 59 is
lower than todays cost. The cost of $0.1105 for Lateral Storm Sewer on Roll No.
92, is about the same cost today. Based on the original cost and a maximum of
10 years interest, the present cost would be as follows:
Roll No. 59
$0.03 plus 0.07 x 10 x 0.03 = 0.03 + 0.021 = $0.051
Roll No. 92
$0.1105 plus 0.105 x 5 x 0.1105 = 0.1105 + 0.0580 = $0.1685
Based on the above, the actual rates to be used should be as follows:
Roll No. 59 - $0.051 per square foot - Trunk
Roll No. 92 - $0.1105 per square foot - Lateral
The cost of $12.88 per lineal foot for Watermain and $13.06 per lineal foot for
Sanitary Sewer on Roll No. 80, as well as the $13.74 per lineal foot for
Sanitary Sewer on Roll No. 90, are probably in line with today's cost. We have
not had any in the last few years that are comparable. Our recent Sanitary
Sewer and Watermain projects, have been in new areas included with other work.
Based on the original cost and interest to date, the present cost would be as
follows:
Roll No. 80
$12.88 plus 0.07 x 6 x 12.88 = 12.88 + 5.41 = $18.29
$13.06 plus 0.07 x 6 x 13.06 = 13.06 + 5.49 = $18.55
Roll No. 90
$13.74 plus 0.105 x 5 x 13.74 = 13.74 + 7.21 = $20.95
Based on the above, the actual rate to be used should be as follows:
Roll No. 80
$12,88 per lineal foot - Watermain
$13.06 per lineal foot - Sanitary Sewer
Roll No. 90
$13.74 per lineal foot - Sanitary Sewer
Based on this information, the deferred assessments would be as follows:
Roll No.
Original Principal
Present Principal
58
$ 140.63
$ 223.92
59
$ 305.04
$ 518.57
73
$ 623.58
$ 909.83
80
$9,621.34
$9,621.34
90
$6,663.90
$6,663.90
92
$5,165.88
$5,165.88
•
11
•
City Administrator
Santelman's Second Addition
November 4, 1986
Page 3
•
Cost per lot in Santelman's Second Addition would be as follows:
Roll No.
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3 Interest Rate
58
$ 31.98
$ 95.97
$ 95.97
59
$ 74.09
$ 222.24
$ 222.24
73
$ 129.95
$ 389.93
$ 389.93
80
$1,374.48
$4,123.43
$4,123.43
90
$ 951.98
$2,855.96
$2,855.96
92
$ 737.98
$2,213.95
$2,213.95
The revised data is based on our present policy.
Lot 1 is a standard size lot in new additions and the above costs total
$2,300.46. Based on future improvements for street in this plat, the
additional cost would be $3,100.00. The total cost for the lot would then
be $4,400.46. This compares to a cost of approximately $6,000.00 for a lot
of this size in a new addition, with all improvements to be installed.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
•
MVP /pv
L
/ o
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year met forth
hereinafter, by and between Kenneth E. 6 Marcella C. Santelman, hereinafter
called the "Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation
in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a certain
subdivision known as SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION, which is located in the City
of Hutchinson, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires subdividers to make
certain improvements in the Subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is understood and agreed that water and sanitary sewer mains are
inplace on Paul's Road and Hilltop Drive, that will serve all lots in
this Subdivision.
2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider will install sanitary
sewer and water service leads to all lots of this Subdivision by
November 1, 1986. 40
3. It is understood and agreed that all grading in the rear and side
yard utility easements will be completed by the Subdivider before a
Building Permit is issued for any lot in the Subdivision.
4. It shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to clear trees
and /or debris from utility easements, as per the request of the
utility prior to installation of the facility.
5. It is understood and agreed that all electrical and gas lines in
easements that may have to be moved by request of the property owner,
will be done at said property owners expense.
6. It is understood and agreed that the grading and gravel sub -base,
curb and gutter and surfacing improvements on Hilltop Drive are
programmed and that the costs that are assessable to the Subdivision
will be assessed as follows:
Lot 1 - 1/7
Lot 2 - 3/7
Lot 3 - 3/7
Said improvements may be completes under more than one contract.
Each contract shall be assessed as shown.
7. It is understood and agreed that the grading, gravel base, surfacing
and curb and gutter improvements of Paul's Road are programmed for
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
•
PAGE 2
1989 and that the costs that are
assessable to the Subdivision will
be assessed on a front foot basis.
8. It is understood and agreed that
future storm sewer will be
constructed in the area of Santelman's First Addition that will serve
part of Santelman's Second Addition, the cost assessable to
Santelman's Second Addition will
be on a square foot basis.
9. It is understood and agreed that
the following improvements have been
completed by the City and the assessments shown have been deferred:
Roll
Original Date
No. Type
Interest Principal Adopted
58 Grade 6 Gravel
7.00% $ 829.85 8 -12 -75
59 Watermain, Sanitary Sewer
8 7.00% $ 1,800.00 8 -12 -75
Storm Sewer
73 Curb 6 Gutter 8 Bituminous
7.00% $ 3,677.53 8 -22 -78
Surfacing
80 Sanitary Sewer A Watermain
7.00% $ 269159.64 8 -26 -80
•
90 Sanitary Sewer A Appurt.
10.50% $ 6,663.90 6 -30 -81
92 Lateral Storm Sewer
10.50% $ 5,165.88 7 -28 -81
It is understood and agreed that
the following, present principal
assessment amounts for the above
- referenced improvements, will be
activated and charged to Santelman's Second Addition.
Roll No. Original Principal
Present Principal
58 $ 140.63
$ 248.92
59 $ 305.04
$ 539.92
73 $ 623.58
$ 972.78
80 $ 9,621.34
$13,662.30
90 $ 69663.90
$10,162.45
92 $ 5,165.88
$ 7,877.97
It is understood and agreed that
the above - mentioned activated
present principal assessment amounts will be assessed on each lot as
•
follows:
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PAGE 3
Roll No.
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
58
$
35.56
$
106.68
$
106.68
59
$
77.14
$
231.39
$
231.39
73
$
138.96
$
416.91
$
416.91
So
$
1,951.76
$
5,855.27
$
5,855.27
90
$
19451.77
$
4,355.34
$
4,355.34
92
$
1,125.43
$
39376.27
$
31376.27
Interest Rate
7.005
7.005
7.005
7.005
10.505
10.505
The assessments may be certified over a ten year period. Each years
certification will be 105 of the present principal, plus interest,
based on the rate for each roll.
The Subdivider hereby waives all rights to a public hearing and
appeal to the above - reference assessments to be activated for each
lot in the Subdivision. The waiving of all such rights shall be
binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and
successors of the Subdivider.
10. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider will make a cash
contribution to the City of Hutchinson for Parks and Playground for
Santelman's Second Addition in the amount of $478.94, which is for
one dwelling unit per lot. Charges for additional dwelling units per
lot will be due at the time a Building Permit is issued and the cost
will be according to the City Fee Schedule for additional units at
the time said permit is issued.
11. It is understood and agreed that to fulfill City Policy, two trees
will be provided in the margin (boulevard) of each lot. The
Subdivider or property owner shall purchase from the City and pay one
half the cost of said trees and the City's portion of the payment for
the trees shall not exceed $10.00 per tree. Said trees shall be
planted by the property owner.
The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to install two trees per lot
and assess the properties in the subdivision, the cost less allowed
City's portion of said cost. Said installation to be included in the
last assessable improvement to be installed for the subdivision. All
trees installed at the time of said last assessable improvement will
be credited to the properties where the trees are located.
•
•
Species selection will be determined by the Tree Board. Should the
Subdivider or property owner wish to plant a tree which deviates from •
the selected specie list, he /she must present his /her request to the
Tree Board.
•
u
•
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PAGE 4
The City will, at no charge to the property owner, replace any tree
which dies within one year of the time of planting.
12. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
13. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office
and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is
recorded.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said Kenneth E. Santelman and Marcella C. Santelman,
have hereunto set their hands this _ day of , 19_
Kenneth E. Santelman Marcella C. Santelman
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19_, by Kenneth E.
Santelman and Marcella C. Santelman, husband and
wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
Approved by the City Council on the _ day of 19_•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Paul L.
Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
(612) 587.5151
yvrcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: October 31, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Project 86 -14
Bids were received on October 13th, 1986, for the Drainage Line, Inlets and
Berm to be constructed on the property East of Robert's First Addition.
Attached for your information, is a copy of the "Engineer's Report ".
The bid received for the construction cost of said project was in the amount
of $5,727.50. A copy of said bid is attached.
• To proceed on this project, I assume some reduction in cost will have to be
made. Also, we should obtain an easement from the property owners.
MVP /pv
attachment
cc: City Attorney
•
W ey -
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
r (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: November 4, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Project 86 -14
If it is decided to proceed with this project, awarding of the contract
should not be made until we hold an assessment hearing.
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP /pv
V
Is
•
•
u
•
U
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
DATE: August 129 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: Drainage Improvement Project
Gentlemen:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is
feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a
hearing be held on the 9th day of September, 1986.
PROJECT NO. 86 -14: Construction of Drainage Line, Inlets and Berm on Property
East of Robert's First Addition
Construction Cost
4,400.00
Engineering
308.00
Fiscal and Miscellaneous
308.00
Land Acquisition
0.00
Capitalized Interest
352.00
TOTAL---- --------- ---- -------- -- - - - --$
5.368.00
Assessable Cost $
59368.00
Deferred Assessable Cost
0.00
City Cost
0.00
TOTAL-- ------- --- ----- -------- ---- - --$
5.368.00
Respectfully submitted,
Marlow Y. Priebe
Director of Engineering
City Clerk
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson, Mn 55350
Va. the undersigned. doing business as �/u uX �a f�r��74
and hereinafter known as the Bidder, hereby propose and, if this proposal is •
accepted, agree to enter into an agreement with the City of Hutchinson on a
form to be provided by and acceptable to the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, to
furnish all labor, machinery, equipment and tools and other means of
construction necessary for the complete construction of the work, all in
strict accordance with the plans and specifications entitled "CONSTRUCTION
PLANS FOR STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES - LETTING NO. 14 - PROJECT NO. 86 -14."
LETTING NO. 14 - PROJECT NO. 86 -14
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
1.
8" Perforated P.V.C. Drain Tile
L.F.
326
$ 'V 7S
$ ag 5d.So
2.
8" P.V.C. Tee
EACH
3
35.00
/06.00
3.
8" P.V.C. Riser /Beehive Grate
EACH
3
GD.00
IJFO. 00
4.
27" Dia. Catch Basin /Beehive
EACH
1
10.00
10.00
Grate
5.
Clearing
L.S.
1
/6400.oe,
/000.00
6.
Common Borrow
C.Y.
80
2 -50
400.00
7.
Construct Earth Berm
L.S.
1
ao•oo
oo•oo
8.
Crushed Rock
C.Y.
40
17.00
G ke.00
TOTAL
$ 6727. so
The undersigned agrees, that, upon written acceptance of this bid, he will, •
within ten (10) days of receipt of such notice, execute a formal Contract
Agreement with the City of Hutchinson, and that he will provide the Bonds or
guarantees, as required. The undersigned agrees that if awarded the Contract,
he will commence the work within thirty (30) calendar days after the date of
receipt of written notice to proceed, that he will complete the construction
as specified in the Special Provisions.
Accompanying this proposal is the Bid Security required to be furnished by the
Contract Documents, the same being subject to forfeiture in event of default
by the undersigned.
In submitting this bid, it is understood, that the right is reserved by the
City to reject any or all bids, and it is agreed that this bid may not be
withdrawn for a period of sixty (60) days from the opening thereof.
If a corporation, what is the State of Incorporation? /uJn
If a partnership, state full names of all co- partners.
Official Address: Firm Name: TuaP (o- eAyE�ina: ro .
/�u�cliinso.� /� 5536-0 Title: �.
Dated: Title S @L . �/ f�
s
•
•
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
July 1, 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland and the
Hutchinson City Council
RE: STORAGE OF ABANDONED OR JUNKED CARS AND TRUCKS
Dear Mayor Ackland:
At the last Hutchinson City Council meeting I was
asked to research the possibility of amending our current
ordinance dealing with unlicensed, wrecked or junked cars or
car bodies. This topic is currently dealt with in Section
1025:10 Subdivision 4 of our ordinances. I am enclosing a
copy of that ordinance for your inspection.
The League of Minnesota Cities provides a Model
Nuisance Ordinance. Section 13 of that model ordinance deals
with automobile bodies as a nuisance. I am enclosing -_a _cry_
of that section for comparison with our current ordinance. I
m
a also enclosing a copy of a more detailed ordinance
regulating junked motor vehicles. This model ordinance is
taken from volume 1B of Matthews Municipal Ordinances. I
believe that this ordinance is more in keeping with the
Council's desires to have a more detailed set of regulations
governing junked or abandoned motor vehicles. You will note
that Section 2 of this proposed ordinance specifically makes
it a separate violation to remove a junked motor vehicle from
one prohibited area and move it to any other area upon which
storage would not be permitted or unto a public highway or
other public property for purposes of storage. This prevents
an owner from playing "musical chairs" with the junked or
abandoned cars.
The question was raised as to the proper method of
handling the so- called "classic cars ". I suggest that the
proposed ordinance specifically exempt classic cars registered
under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 168.10 if such
properly registered cars are stored in compliance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes 168.10 Subd. 1E. This
subdivision permits outdoor storage of pioneer, classic,
collector vehicles, or street rods, licensed or unlicensed,
l
Y_ ,
Mayor Paul kland
July It
1986 Ac
Page Two
iii 4V
operable
inoperable
0
ems - -a nea,, .. - b ",� ..._ riate
:onstitute ublic view a local agency •or
ro
or other appropriate with
from ordinar trees the to comply
ca idl rowin that failure from the
also indicates owner of his removed these
section may inform an the vehicles with
and may order fails to comply It
authority uirement if the owner after the warning• with
that storage area (20) days when combined only
outdoor within twenty ordinance, with not
requirements the proposed deals The City
to me that 168.10 adequate cars the State
seems Statutes the so-called cars but not
Minnesota but of classic if they are
junked vehicles. the storage removed ears to be
Pro us us to have them that app that
may not P view• Since with
authorizes public Taint, compliance
Statute from ordinary P comp and local residents.
screened of the nuisance municipality and are stor
the thrust satisfy the municiP are classic ubli
should the automobiles from ordinary P or
section even if they are screened a health or
Of course, in which de r fact constitute vermin),
rats, mice or other
in a
manner Lhe vehicles maintain
view if hazard (attract prop
erly me
required to be removed or P P and provide
environmental
may still be w these various sections
\/ Please review this matter•
-j with Your thoughts
L. Sincerely Yours,
OF HUTCHINSON
CIT
By/
James H. I
Schaefer
Hutchinson CI Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosures
•
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
/ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
1-1 H/NSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: November 7, 1986
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Marlow V. Priebe, Director of Engineering
—
- ---------------------- - - - ---
SUBJECT: —Reconstruction of Streets
— ------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
To my knowledge the City has only reconstructed one street, that being
Main Street from Fifth Avenue South to Fourth Avenue North (T.H. 7), which
was done in 1968. The surfacing and curb and gutter assessment for the
residential portion was $7.09 per front foot. Other street improvement
projects at that time were $11.60 per front foot.
A few years ago one block of Main Street North from Fourth Avenue North to
Fifth Avenue North was widened and overlayed by the Department of Transpor-
tation. No assessment was made for the City's share of the project because
it was not considered reconstruction.
Earlier this year some streets that were scheduled for an overlay were found
to be in very poor condition. It was determined that an overlay was not cost
effective. Itwas decided to provide reasonable maintenance on them for about
three years and then reconstruct them. At that time it was determined that
an assessment policy would have to be formulated before the reconstruction
of these streets occurred.
It is my opinion that the work programed on T.H. 15 South is a reconstruction
project, at least as far as the City share of the cost is concerned.
Based on the fact that Chapter 429 will probably be used for most reconstruc-
tion projects and that funding will be provided by bonding, at least 20% of
the cost will have to be assessed. Therefore, an assessment policy for street
reconstruction could be adopted that would assess 20% of the cost to proper-
ties based on the short side frontage of the property.
Based on 1986 grading, base and surfacing assessment cost of $25.79 per front
foot for residential property and $50.92 per front foot for commercial property,
the assessment for Main Street would be $5.16 and $10.18 per front foot re-
spectively. Inasmuch as funds other than bonds are available, the assessment
cost could be rounded off to $5.00 and $10.00.
/ms
0
lu: Mayur 8 CiLy CuunciI
From: Bruce Ericson
Barb Haugen
Date: October 7, 1986
The Senior Advisory Board purchased a Microwave Oven for the
Senior Center on February 6, 1986. The oven cost was $249.00
and was purchased at Fitzloff Hardware.
• On May 21, 1986 the Senior Center was vandalized and the Microwave
Oven was stolen. The incident was reported to the police.
We are requesting that the City replace the Microwave Oven.
Fitzloff Hardware has the same model available.
The Senior Advisory Board is instrumental in fund - raising for
the Senior Center and the majority of the Center's equipment has
been purchased with this fund - raising money.
Thank you for your consideration.
n
LJ
9 -a�
%(612) 587 -5151
r CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 f,'ASHfNGTON P,�`�NU -` WEST
H' TCHIN'S�) r nv41NN 55350
November-
jQ%
TO: MAYOR ?
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
M E M O
DATE: October 30, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Campbell Lake Addition
Subdivision Agreement
Attached is the proposed Subdivision Agreement for the Campbell Lake Addition
for you review and approval.
•
MVP /pv
attachment
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
r `1
U
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between John E. Miller and Sedona E. Miller, hereinafter
called the "Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation
in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of Lot 1, Block 3,
Clark's Second Addition, to be known as CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires subdividers to make
certain improvements in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is understood and agreed that the sanitary sewer, watermain,
street grading, gravel base and curb and gutter has been installed
for part of the plat and has been assessed on Assessment Roll No. 202
and 215.
2. It is understood and agreed that the sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
watermain, street grading, gravel base and sewer and water service
leads are being installed under Project No. 86 -13.
3. It is understood and agreed that the original amount assessed on Roll 0
No. 202 was x18,972.05, and that of said cost ,33062.00 will be
apportioned to Lot 1 and $3,162.01 will be apportioned to Lots 2, 3,
4, 5 and 6.
4. It is understood and agreed that the original amount assessed on Roll
No. 215 was $6,016.20 and that of said cost, $1,002.70 will be
apportioned to each lot.
5. It is understood and agreed that there is a deferred cost of x555.00
per dwelling unit, plus interest at the rate of 7.6%. from October 1,
1985, for the inplace Lift Station in Clark's Second Addition, that
serves this Subdivision, as per Assessment Roll No. 202.
It is understood and agreed that the cost, plus interest, shall be
paid at the time a Building Permit is requested.
It is understood and agreed that this payment shall be binding upon
and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of
the Subdivider.
6. It is understood and agreed that the costs for Improvement Project
No. 86 -13 will be assessed on a per lot basis in an equal amount to
each lot in the Subdivision.
0
IOWA
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
PAGE 2
7. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider hereby petitions for
the following additional improvements to the Subdivision:
A. Curb and Gutter
B. Surfacing
It is understood and agreed that said improvements will be
constructed under two contracts beginning in 1987 or later, as deemed
feasible by Subdivider and City. The Subdivider waives all rights to
Public Rearing and appeal for the cost of the improvements. The
waiveing of all such rights shall be binding upon and extend to the
heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the Subdivider.
It is understood and agreed that the total costs of each improvement
that is assessable to CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION, will be assessed on a
per lot basis in an equal amount to each lot in the Subdivision.
8. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider has fulfilled the
Parks and Playground Contribution by the dedication of Park Land in
Clark's Second Addition.
9. It shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to clear trees
• and /or debris from utility easements, as per the request of the
utility prior to installation of the facility.
10. It is understood and agreed that all electrical and gas lines in
easements that may have to be moved by request of the property owner,
will be done at said property owners expense.
11. It is understood and agreed that to fulfill City Policy, two trees
will be provided in the margin (boulevard) of each lot. The
Subdivider or property owner shall purchase from the City and pay one
half the cost of said trees and the City's portion of the payment for
the trees shall not exceed $10.00 per tree. Said trees shall be
planted by the property owner.
The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to install two trees per lot
and assess the properties in the subdivision, the cost less allowed
City's portion of said cost. Said installation to be included in
the last assessable improvement to be installed for the subdivision.
All trees installed at the time of said last assessable improvement
will be credited to the properties where the trees are located.
Species selection will be determined by the Tree Board. Should the
Subdivider or property owner wish to plant a tree which deviates from
the selected specie list, he /she must present his /her request to the
Tree Board.
• The City will, at no charge to the property owner, replace any tree
which dies within one year of the time of planting.
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
PAGE 3
12. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
13. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office
and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is
recorded.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said John E. Miller and Sedona E. Miller, have
hereunto set their hands this _ day of 19_.
John E. Miller Sedona E. Miller
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by John E.
Miller and Sedona E. Miller, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
Approved by the City Council on the day of , 19_. •
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Mayor
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Paul L.
Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
0
3
(612) 587 -5151
J-0"HUTCH/NSON, CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 5, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
— --------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: Ralph Neumann, Maintenance Operations Director
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Additional Circulation In Water Department Aeration Room —
The City Council requested Chuck Barger of RCM to analyze the corrosion
of copper water lines in the downtown area.
• As part of his report, he indicated higher than normal carbon dioxide levels
in our water supply. His recommendation would be to add additional air to
the aeration room by installing another air intake and air blower at an esti-
mated cost of $2,800 to $3,000.
I recommend that we proceed with this project.
/ms
•
9 -c.
V,Y Parks • Recreation • Forestry • Civic Arena
900 Harrington Street • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 • (612) 587 -2975
4h*1S20
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Tree Board
DATE: November 5, 1986
RE: Disbursements of Forestry Revenue
The City of Hutchinson provides trees to homeowners
for planting on city boulevards at a nominal cost.
Traditionally the revenues from those sales have been
returned to the general fund along with revenues from
firewood sales and tree injections.
The 1986 city budget saw appropriation of $2,500
for the purchase of boulevard trees and concurrently
saw $566 returned in tree sales, $434 from firewood and
$90 from tree injection.
The Hutchinson Tree Board recommends the City
Council allow future forestry revenues be used for add-
itional tree purchases instead of being returned to the
general fund. This would allow the city the opportunity
to plant more trees without increasing the city's budget.
The Tree Board feels this appropriation provides
better use of forestry revenues than it's present
appropriation which is to regenerate the general fund.
CC: Bruce Ericson
•
q,t I
%(612) 587.5151
f1!/TCH % CITY OF HUTCHINSON
3 7 O ASH!N�.ON N VE.NUE WEST
MA;N 55350
November 5, 1996
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: APPOINTING CHARLES BAILLY & CO AS 1986 AUDITOR
Attached is a proposal letter for the 1986 audit. Charles
Bailly & Co. has been doi.nq ot_tr audit over the years. In the
proposal the not to exceed dollar caf F18,000 is $750 less than
our 19R5 quote.
It would tie the recommendation to accept this proposal for
the 1986 audit from Charles Bailly & Co.
•
•
q -E.
A -53970
Parkdale Four, Suite 300
5353 Gamble Drive
M)nneapolu, Minnesota 55416
Telephone (612) 5464404
October 22, 1986
Charles Bailly & Company
Certifiedt Public Accoul�tants
J
Mr. Gary Plotz
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Gary:
offices in Minnesota,
Moutana, North Dakota
and South Dakota
Associates in principal cities
of United States, Canada,
Mexico, Europe
and Avis
We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide
for the City of Hutchinson for the year ended December 31, 1986. We will
audit the general purpose financial statements of City of Hutchinson as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1986. Also, we will include in your report
the following supplemental information that will be subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements:
1. Combining statements
•, 2. Individual statements
3. Schedules
our audit will be made in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and will include tests of the accounting records of the City of
Hutchinson and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express
an unqualified opinion that the financial statements are fairly presented in
confirmity with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
If our opinion is other than unqualified, we will fully discuss the reasons
with you in advance.
Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the
transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical
existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain
other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals,
creditors, and banks. We will request written representations from your
attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to
this inquiry. At the conclusion of our examination, we will also request
certain written representations from you about the financial statements and
related matters.
An audit is based primarily on the selective testing of accounting records and
related data; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of
transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. Because we will not
perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that
• material errors, irregularities, or illegal acts, including fraud or
defalcations, may exist and not be detected by us. We will advise you,
however, of any matters of that nature that come to our attention.
?-E.
We understand that you will provide us with the basic information required for
our audit and that you are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of
that information. We will advise you about appropriate accounting principles
and their application and will assist in the preparation of your financial
statements, but the responsibility for the financial statements remains with
you. This responsibility includes the maintenance of adequate records and
related controls, the selection and application of accounting principles, and
the safeguarding of assets.
We understand that your employees will type all cash or other confirmations we
request and will locate any invoices selected by us for testing.
Our examination is not specifically designed and cannot be relied on to
disclose material weaknesses in accounting controls. However, during the
audit, if we become aware of such material weaknesses in internal accounting
control or ways that we believe management practices can be improved, we will
communicate them to you in a separate letter.
Our fees for these services will be based on the actual time spent at our
standard hourly rates, plus travel and other out -of- pocket costs such as
report production, typing, postage, etc. Our standard hourly rates vary
according to the degree of responsibility involved and the experience level of
the personnel assigned to your audit. Our fee for this engagement will not
exceed $18,000.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of Hutchinson and
believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our
engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with
the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the
enclosed copy and return it to us.
Sincerely,
CHARLES BAILLY & COMPANY
�' G C.P.A.
Vern C. Grabow
This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
NAME AND TITLE DATE
•
•
EM DING COMM9 INC.
People With Experience Who Care
*FFICE. TWELVE OAKS CENTER SUITE 1009 P.O. BOX 129 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612) 473-4765
October 31, 1986 ti°3o3, t Ss'89
w L %V 1986
Mr. Gary D. Plotz N RECEIVED
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Gary: Re: Fire Hydrants
At a meeting at the City Hall last year on November 15, 1985 we
were in agreement regarding the installation of two new hydrants
on Century and Freemont Avenues.
One hydrant that is approximately 50 feet from the Southeast
corner of the building has already been installed. Has it been
tested to be sure it is in operating condition?
The second one was to be installed approximately 100 -150 feet
from the Northwest corner of our building just across Freemont
in front of the three story white apartment building. This one
• has not as yet been installed. I am sure we all agree it should
be put in as soon as possible so that we will not run across
frozen ground conditions.
At the November 15, 1985 meeting there was also a discussion as
to payment and it was, I believe,understood that these hydrants
as others in Hutchinson, would be assessed to the property
,,owners benefiting from the protection.
We have discussed this with our property owners that have bought
thus far and they have agreed to taking their fair share of such
items through assessment or whatever the appropriate procedure
is. We, of course, as developers own the unsold units and I
confirm again that we will be willing to pay for those items
assessed to us.
The new Southeast corner hydrant serves mainly Greencastle and
while it would assist some on the backside of the home owners
on Bradford we would be willing to take the entire assessment for
this cost without involving others. For the one on the Northwest
corner just across Freemont, it is obvious that it serves equally
for protection to the two apartment buildings on the North side
of Freemont as well as to Creencastle. I believe there is only
one owner for both those buildings and if it would help I will be
glad to discuss the matter with him.
• I am suggesting that to avoid the delays of the hearing, the
proper petition form be drawn up which I and the other home owners
of Greencastle would sign along with the owner of the apartments
across the street. This would confirm that we would each take our
SPECIALIZING IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RETIREMENT HOUSING & SERVICES / 'F
Mr. Gary D. Plotz •
October 31, 1986
Page 2
share of the assessment for this hydrant.
I believe hydrants cost from approximately $1,200 to $1,500 and
I understand that the water main is in and available for the
hydrant on Freemont. I hope this can expedite the installation
of the Freemont hydrant which I believe is very important for fire
protection for all three multi- family dwellings, Greencastle
and the two apartments.
Sincerely,
Newe11Py,: Weed, Jr.
President
cc: Mayor Ackland •
Jeffrey Stebbins
Elizabeth Brusehaver
John Keefe
C�
PROPERTY PROTECTION SINCE 1922
1
BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEMS FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS
I
• G. L. ANDERSON M. E. BERTRAM B. L. BOWES R. F. BERTRAM
PROTECTIVE ALARM SERVICE AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made this tat day of November , 19 86 , by and between Electro Watchman.
Inc., hereinafter called "E. W., Inc.," and Hutchinson Sewer 6 Water Department
hereinafter called "Subscriber."
1. INSTALLATION. E. W., Inc, agrees to install and service without liability and not as an insurer, during the term of this
Agreement, the protection, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "System," set forth below, on Subscriber's premises:
Hutchinson HN 5535U B79 -2311
Stl t Add -n CM. Sus., ZIP Coda Pnav
Type of System jN9pW (Central) Alarm: to Hutchinson Police Dept. For Equipment Failure Alarms
2. SCHEDULE OF PROTECTION. for Sewage Treatment Plants Water Treatment Plant 6 4 Lift
Stations
It is understood and agreed that the System, including all devices, instruments, appliances, connections, wires, conduits and
other materials associated therewith, except telephone company lines, is and shall at all times remain the sole property of
E. W., Inc.
3. TERM AND PAYMENT. Subscriber hereby agrees to pay to E. W., Inc., its agents or assigns, the sum o1
______ .____ p
Dollars o j upon completion of said installation,
and to pay in addition the sum of -Seven hundred ninety -two and 00/100 - - - -- Dollars I$ 792.00 )
Par annum, payable (d18WA A (quarterlyl in the amount of One hundred ninety -eight and 0I /100 -
Dollars I$ 19R. nn ) in advance, plus any taxes, including sales taxes, fees or charges that are imposed by any
governmental body relating to the installation or service provided under this Agreement, for a period of two
1 2 1 years from the date said installation is completed. Thereafter, this Agreement shall continue in force and
effect from month to month and shall be terminable upon thirty 130) days' written notice by registered or certified mail
given by either party hereto to the other,
• 4. ENTIRE UNDERSTANDING. Subscriber acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Agreement. This Agreement contains
the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes any other oral or written agreements or representations.
5. E. W., INC. IS NOT AN INSURER - LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. It is understood and agreed by and between the
parties hereto that E. W., Inc. is not an insurer nor is this Agreement intended to be an insurance Policy or a substitute for an
insurance policy. Insurance, if any, will be obtained by Subscriber. Payments provided for herein are based solely upon the
value of the services provided for, and are unrelated to the value of Subscriber's Property or the property of others on
Subscribers premises. The amounts payable by Subscriber are not sufficient to warrant E. W., Inc. assuming any risk of
consequential or other damages to Subscriber due to E. W., Inc.'s negligence or failure to perform. Subscriber does not desire
this Agreement to provide for the liability of E. W., Inc., and Subscriber agrees that E. W., Inc. shall not be liable for loss or
damage due directly or indirectly to any occurrence or consequences therefrom which the System is designed to detect or
avert. If E. W., Inc. should be found liable for loss or damage due to a failure on the part of E. W., Inc. or the System, in any
respect, its liability shall be limited to the refund to Subscriber of an amount equal to six 161 times the total monthly charge
shown herein, or to the sum of Two Hundred Fifty 1$250.001 Dollars, whichever sum shall be less, and this liability shall be
exclusive. The provisions of this Paragraph shall apply in the event loss or damage, irrespective of cause or origin, results
directly or indirectly to person or property from the Performance or non - performance of the obligations set forth by the
terms of this Agreement, or from negligence, active or otherwise, of E. W., Inc. Its agents, or employees.
6. E. W., INC: S LIABILITY. E. W., Inc. does not represent or warrant that the System may not be compromised or
circumvented: that the System will prevent any loss by burglary, hold -up, fire or otherwise; or that the System will in all cases
provide the protection for which it is installed or intended. Subscriber acknowledges that E. W., Inc. is not an insurer, that
Subscriber assumes all risk for loss or damage to Subscriber's premises of to its contents, that E. W., Inc. has made no
representations or warranties, nor has Subscriber relied on any representations or warranties, express or implied, except as set
forth herein, and Subscriber acknowledges that he has read and understands this Agreement, particularly Paragraph 5 above
which sets forth E. W., Inc.'s obligation and maximum liability in the event of any loss or damage to Subscriber. E. W„ INC.
MAKES NO OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS FOR A PURPOSE. E. W., INC. SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR DIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES. YOU, THE SUBSCRIBER, MAY CANCEL THIS TRANSACTION AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO
MIDNIGHT OF THE THIRD BUSINESS DAY AFTER THE DATE OF THIS TRANSACTION. SEE THE ATTACHED
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION FORM FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THIS RIGHT.
Accepted:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON/
St. Paul Nr.vnmhne 1 19 R(.
- sudn. lea.
(�ys -ELECTRO WATCHMAN, INC.
• By / / /R.1iI�J > G •f� By
Its �.Peg�s� THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED ON REVERSE
SIDE THIS AGREEMENT AnZ INCORPO
Submitted by Marjorie E. Bertram ANOBYFREFERENCEMADE APARTHEREOFpATED HEREIN
WHITE: OFFICE CANARY: SUBSCRIBER
�_
W �(I�wrliJ� PROTECTION INC INCE 12
S 2 ALARM$Y$TEM$
1 �� PROPERTY FIRE
SYSTEMS
BERTRAM
BURGLAR ALARM B, L. BOWES
M. E. BERT RAM Inc..
G. L. ANDERSON MONITORING AGREEMENT by and between Electr0 Watchman,
19�-•
day 01 cant Ade.oz
ent is made this to Sulo"iber's 9"miaas at called
This Agreement %led '•E W.. Inc.:' and d
lter w •• with respect MN 553 0 ¢h °mw Icated above
hereinafte
here in Iled'•Subscrib"otchinaon the he system, I sPec%fred celoH
r
hereinafter ca ,v cod. to be Provided at ..the system, d
I cause One Nundre
atv. ss.u. rees to Provide �'� cna —rge °t
SYSTEM. E `W., Inc. a9 ns the connection charge
well as the month V I
sometimes relerred to herein a
^¢coons l 158.10 1
T. THE S nd /or con its ¢gents or assi9 __ --
ses'9 Me services a Inc.. -- ollars l$� Ddyors at the service
"the Premi bsc" 6 1W11 to pa- E.W ------ _- D overtime body relate
TheeMonthly charges
2. PAFift -El hL S 1 i100-' _ osed by aI'9° installation. The
E le , completion of 'be 5132,00 Annual lyl
100- -- -� -� ar9e5 Mat are imP
No es, lees or chat 'ce
Eleven sales tax �ar5¢ Is payable upo aeme,
vexes indudin9 nt The C° ^tt¢ction etiod of shin Agr
t yearlsl from the date a deer
plus any teeme in am, lot the P for a period of lads until Party IntaMe of such
this provided under Annuall 1811 force and eNect ¢idler pam
a PaVaMa e11 remain thereafter lot adduce term nua P
In also inated by
er Is A9reertlent sh auto ticallV
ma ,t may
shall continue is A9reente
Part
to the o ,bar.
B, TERM. Th remises eiNer P
is operative hereunder, andvacate Me P delivered by YICE.
riber LNG SER enti
partV- Sh°uld $ubsc�I daYS' written ,once shall MONITOR fission Equ1Pm
'nations, MirtY l ••Signal Transm
term) OF MAINTENANCE ANDIOR
q, SCHEDULE
ling $VStem
of Protective Signa
TVPa Maintenance Service fitted
signals to be trartsm arse
Number sign Service ResP hone lines 01
Inc. Emergency 1
E. W anon
KeV Service in u•s Central h for notification over Subscriber's to ¢ bscriber's
Al ng U,it to be osed Name'
•Connection t�e'r'I'ansm urisdiction. lA9encV E.W.•
Central Station ove
tic O l lnc.•6
Automa nt A9e,cV be mused lot notification o
�— Law Enforcenne
Digital Communicator to
telePb °^e lines.
rocedmes. Me0
mandard° ehanhave
n accordance wira their tmieg station, is and ce
Me selephoce comPa^Y+ all 5e Installed bV rM1em're<eiving xW �Prany eas°n vMat er, �necnessvilV
ce
Me associated meemanv for any r w
mom an f Mrs A9 erenom wmthovt liahih
On terminanon O . marl M
•limsleesednan anel han014idn Premise elnegmp Mea re
_ es end '^p° mi
1 EW :s Durres ra
• rem+nTPN an or 5ubscd This Agr¢nmmt c
IMPO ape ontom
Me night �a �nta Me oar _ reern parties hereto Mat
to Ma premires m do ^9 s°' of tms Pg ¢ If any.
r % ¢tlgas ne�agreemenIs myreeresentanons. eed M and between M y. Imurance
knave and air mumnce Po ¢ n d to
LNG. �Oxll, 1t is uncle tote 1 ces Pr -ded tor, ae ar rt' ent to
UNDERSTAND es any ocher onl or BIAS stood
S, ENTIREo UN eartins and weer LIMITATION OFto h¢ao Inn" 1auooai rvalu� °t MS pavatle bl S'hsc' r not op mmf
ding AR INSURER— t intended d zde V The emoun 1nu s nW -nice Man^ wrh
undrsp^ C IS NOT Mn Aar•w^°n d for bon"n a 5ceps riba� s pmmmses. due to E.W Met E W
S. E.W., IN 'murer rim 1a menu prov,,R on to $Yllae endr5ubt ^cer °area s designed to "'101 i 11ebi1mwlMTl of I. E W.. 1n is nos �' PmpertV ark O1 P�nse9uenti 1pmon Pleb me9 E,W„ I Irum stem i . m u'n h. other
salned _ icM1 Me 5v
1iN ° a Mere Imo_ a MaMSVOStemerem.or t f cam of 1 aPD1Y mn Me
veil M 1 Sow" rs harga I any Me value °W .. 1 ^P'� , . thn Agreard^ya to enV occu fenu 61 'be, dte I I loss lvmecThe Prw onsp ope.N noor E W ,1hC' b agent.
warransy. eces no . _.w„ Or indirec _ u.mngn d...... n six _._..ran be exe _n., co ceaa! ;° ti oMerwise.
5t
his
m.
IFI
re
•
pPCeptad: • 19 B�
Se tember 26
Ss.Pwl INC. Ausnorimd RePmesanNTAI •
IATCHMAN, BV NTA,,, T REVERSE
ELECTRO ITIONS �LaCpPPORATED HEREIN
- THE TERM5 AND CONO
y REFERENCE MADE A PART HERE OF.
SIDE OF THIS AGREEMENT pR
By AND
President RISER -�
to p• Bert 0 _-
Richard CAa1ARY'SUBSC
SvpnlstetlM WHITE: OFFICE
(612) 587.5151
jffHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 6, 1986
TO: MAYOR & — CITY COUNCIL
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: — DENTAL INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR 25 YEAR OLD STUDENTS — — —
Our dental insurance company, Sun Life, currently provides dental
coverage for full time students but not the age 25 as we had under
the Canada Life program. We have been working over the past several weeks
to try and get this corrected.
• Sun Life tells us the specs, which we prepared, did not have the coverage
to age 25. Our agent, Bob Martin & Assoc., also has verified this to us.
Sun Life now will make an adjustment for the coverage but at a cost of
28. According to the letter from Bob Martin & Assoc. the new rates would
be $23.12 for family coverage and $10.80 for single coverage. If this
had been their original bid the Sun Life company would still be low
bidder.
•
It appears to maintain the same coverage we should agree to this adjustment.
a
BOB MARTIN & ASSOCIATES
01412 Soo Line Building, Fifth & Marquette
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Group Insurance Brokers
Mr. Kenneth B. Merrill
Finance Director
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Merrill:
fJJf�� 6121333 -7320
r
October 28, 1986
re: Group Dental Insurance
Sun Life of Canada (policy #48407)
In accordance with our telephone conversation of this morning,
you will find enclosed a copy of a letter we received from Sun Life
of Canada regarding the contract definition of 'dependent'. This letter
• was sent in response to Gary Plotz' 10/1/86 request to change the
dependent coverage (copy enclosed). In order for Sun Life to match the
definition that was used by your previous carrier, Canada Life, Sun
would require a 2% increase in rates. The rate structure would be
affected as follows:
Bid Rate Bid Rate + 2%
Single coverage 10.59 10.80
Family coverage 22.67 23.12
According to our notes on the bid opening, even with the 2%
increase, Sun Life's family rate still represents the lowest bid, and the
single rate remains strongly competitive in comparison to the other bids.
As we discussed on the phone, it is difficult to ascertain whether the
other bids would have matched the Canada Life definition of eligible
dependent (age 21 for non — students, age 25 for dependent, full —time
students), since there was no reference to the definition of dependent
in the specifications provided to the bidders. I have taken the liberty
to call several of the bidders to ask them for their standard definition
of dependent. In all cases, coverage for non — student dependents (other
than disabled dependents) terminated at age 19. For full —time students,
half of the companies I contacted said they had a maximum age limit of
23 and the others said age 25. This appears to be a flexible item,
• however, the age 19 limit for non — students seemed firm in all cases.
?_#1
K. Merrill
—2— October 28, 1986
Another item worth noting is that the carrier prior to Canada
Life, Crown Life, covered eligible dependents to age 19 for non — students
and to age 23 for dependent full —time students. This definition, which
is identical to the one included in the present contract with Sun Life at
the original bid rates,was the definition used in the City's dental
contract until the changeover to Canada Life effective 8/1/83.
Mr. Merrill, please let us know if we can be of any further
assistance. We have spoken with the people at Sun several times regarding
this matter -- their final answer is that they are willing to adjust
their definition for a 2% rate increase. Don't hesitate to call me if
you have any questions or need clarification on any of this.
We appreciate the opportunity to continue to be of service to the City!
Sincerely,
C
Terry M Glynn �����VZ"t—
/tjm
encl
0
0
S
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING November 10, 1986
•
WATER & SEWER FUND
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
social sec. contribution
*PERA
_,,r;loyer contribution
$252.11
*D.O.E.R.
social sec. contribution
429.37
*U.S. Postmaster
postage for water bills
142.50
Patrice Vander Veen
seminar lunch
6.79
Berger P1bg & Htg.
2 service calls
38.68
Maguire Iron Inc.
contract payment
38,860.00
Willard Pellinen
survey & sketch
330.00
HCI of Hutchinson
power strip
59.95
Big Bear
supplies
16.23
Cash Drawer #4
postage & fuses
27.93
Coast to Coast
supplies
140.10
Electro Watchman
contract payment
478.21
Farm & Home
supplies
19.42
Floor Care Supply
cleaning supplies
46.64
GTC Auto Parts
supplies
1.92
G & K Services
uniform rental
151.80
Fitzloff Hardware
supplies
30.87
Hutch Cennex
gasoline
909.95
Hutch Iron & Metal
supplies
19.20
Hutch P1bg & Htg.
part
9.00
Hutch Telephone
phone service
231.90
Hutch Utilities
gas & electricity
14,349.33
Wholesale Supply
supplies
9.67
•Hutch
Junker Sanitation
refuse chgs.
27,462.50
McLeod Co. Sanitary Landfill
Oct. dumping charges
35.00
Plaza OK Hardware
supplies
17.98
Quades
parts
2.20
Sorensen Farm Supply
rental & supplies
63.70
Water Products
meters & parts
3578.80
$ 87,721.75
employer contribution
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
social sec. contribution
*PERA
supplies
*D.O.E.R.
supplies
Crysteel Dist. Inc.
timber
Southwest Battery Inc.
parts
Structural Specialties
parts
Thill Track & Tractor
repairs & parts
Orvis Wahl
parts
Brandon Tire
parts & tools
GTC Auto Parts
parts
Hutch Wholesale Supply
repairs & parts
Jerabek Machine Shop
parts
MTI Dist. Co.
•Road
Machinery
Plaza OK Hardware
parts
Plowmans
supplies
Sorensen Farm Supply
$ 87,721.75
employer contribution
$ 42.91
social sec. contribution
72.20
supplies
14.18
supplies
86.00
timber
75.84
parts
2850.00
parts
24.00
repairs & parts
263.00
parts
2870.89
parts & tools
400.72
parts
5.01
repairs & parts
212.35
parts
1021.26
supplies & tools
10.23
parts
115.97
supplies
40.53
$ 8,105.09
//-a I
-2-
GENERAL FUND
*University of Minnesota
registration fee
$ 85.00
•*ICMA Retirement Corp.
employer contribution
146.47
*PERA
employer contribution
4104.97
*D.O.E.R.
social sec. contribution
3529.19
*Dept. of Natural REsources
snowmobile reg. fees
66.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
snowmobile reg. fees
76.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
ORV reg. fees
18.00
Sedona Miller
election judge
48.58
Phyllis Weseloh
election judge
48.58
DeLaine Rolfe
election judge
48.58
Evelyn Prochnow
election judge
48.58
Margaret Sorensen
election judge
48.58
Darlene Knigge
election judge
49.41
Doris Daggett
election judge
49.41
Pat Kuester
election judge
49.41
Laverna Miller
election judge
49.41
Marie T. Antony
election judge
49.41
Arliss F. C1abo
election judge
49.41
Sharon Rostberg
election judge
49.41
Lillias J. Gilhousen
election judge
49.41
Norma D. Schepers
election judge
49.41
Harriet Wixcey
election judge
49.41
Fern Frank
election judge
45.23
Norma Totushek
election judge
11.73
Verna Anderson
election judge
56.95
Mary Wangerin
election judge
56.95
Flaa
election judge
56.95
•Juleen
Rosina Johnson
election judge
56.95
Eva S. Maas
election judge
56.95
Grace Kottke
election judge
50.25
Mildred Nelson
election judge
50.25
Rose Kadlec
election judge
50.25
Irma Kreie
election judge
50.25
Mary J. Brummond
election judge
50.25
Hazel Dasher
trip refund
25.00
Robert Ringstrom
seminar
69.87
Nancy Buss
Posse VI training
61.15
Jean Gray
seminar
52.99
Patrice Vander Veen
seminar lunches
14.04
Judith Thiesfeld
skating refund
24.00
Norman Wright
safety boots
30.00
Jason Brown
football coach
72.00
Jason Reece
football coach
16.00
Dan Peerine
football referee
120.00
Richard Popp
State Fire Chief conf.
7.55
J.David Nelson
gas key refund
30.00
Alexander Mfg. Co.
parts battery
81.24
Dept. of Labor
boiler certificates
115.00
Fire Engineering
subscription 1 yr.
18.95
HUTCH HI School
1986 -87 annual
20.00
HCVN Channel 10
3'i hr. instruction fee
35.00
Channel 10
Nov. franchise paymtnet
750.00
•HCVN
Mn.Dept of Health
food licenses
142.50
Police Officers Grievance Bulletin
bulletin
39.95
Redman Travel
canvas repair fire dept.
10.00
-3a
Seq ucia Pacific System Corp.
election supplies
349.23
SherwoodCorp.
gas masks
762.75
Union
message to DC
11.20
•Western
A & B Electric
repairs
35.00
Allen Office Products
supplies
31.73
_ Am.Welding Inc.
welding gas
16.95
Atkinson Blacktop
supplies
69.00
Am. Public Works Assn.
dues
105.00
Big Bear
supplies
24.70
Bulleyes REloading
supplies
128.00
Bennett Office Supplies
repairs and supplies
24.94
John Bernhagen
nov. compensation
1662.50
Ben Franklin
construction paper
2.76
Cash Wise
supplies
.89
Cash Drawer #4
supplies
71.57
Crow River Vet Clinic
oct. boarding dogs
315.00
Coast to Coast
supplies
203.64
Coca Cola Bottling
supplies
487.00
Chamber of Commerce
office rental & copier rental
159.87
Carneys
instructor fee
12.00
McLeod
dlpferes
923.580
CCommmmof
tt
CoomiganaWa?erA�ondors
mon ?nly service & salt
4MB
E -Z Sharp Inc.
supplies
184.22
Erickson More 4
supplies
25.19
Family RExall Drug
office supplies
23.90
Farm & Home
supplies
195.79
Floor Care Supply
cleaning supplies etc.
448.40
•Fitzloff Hardware
supplies
214.68
Gopher Sign Co.
signs
418.54
G & K Services
uniform rental
589.45
Holmsten Ice Rinks
supplies
120.49
Hager Jewelry
ups
2.90
Hutch Coop
gasoline
2416.93
Home Bakery Inc.
election supplies
20.40
Hutch Drug
supplies
2.19
Hutch Iron & Metal
supplies
27.09
Hutch Leader
publications
291.74
Hutch Plbg & Htg.
part
5.35
Hutch Telephone
phone service
2954.39
Hutch Utilities
gas & electricity
10,643.95
Hutch Utilities
lamps
327.73
Hutch Wholesale Supplies
supplies
112.23
Hutch Fire & Safety
service extinguishers
17.50
Ink Spots Inc.
supplies
144.50
Jahnkes Red owl
supplies
8.45
Lamberts Standard
car washing
2.00
Mn. Playground Inc.
2 mesh nets
1015.00
Mankato Mobile Radio
battery
65.71
Mankato Bus. Products
meter charges
40.00
Kenneth B. Merrill
recording fees & parking fees
22.00
Midcontinent Theatre Co.
office rental
350.00
Mpls Star Tribune
help wanted ad
141.60
•McGarvery Coffee
police coffee
147.70
No. American Cable Systems
basic cable
8.31
OZsons Locksmith
repairs
114.00
Plaza OK Hardware
supplies
36.46
Quades
repairs & supplies
260.60
• Rockite Silo Inc.
Rockite Silo INC.
Rutz Plbg. & HGtg.
.Richard Waage
R. E. Mooney & Associates
R & R Specialties
Schlueters Refrigeration
Shopko
Simonson Lbr. Co.
Sorenson Farm Supply
State of Mn.
Sharstrom P1bg.
James Schaefer
Town & Country Tire
Tenemec Co. Inc.
Tri County Water Cond.
Uniforms Unlimited
Xerox
West Pub Co.
Wm. Mueller & Sons
• BOND FUNDS
Bonds of 1986
Hutch utilities
J.W. Hanson Construction
Juul Contractin
Erickson & Templin
Bonds of 2985
Farmers Elevator
Bonds of 1979
Norwest Bank
Bonds of 2977
Norwest Bank
L- -A
supplies
7.06
supplies
38.64
parts
10.80
meeting expenses
120.43
supplies
67.12
supplies
47.98
parts
798.45
supplies
42.93
supplies
23.85
supplies
83.20
motor veh. & traffic law book
39.00
repairs
26.23
;� Nov. compensation
1031.00
repairs
33.32
parts
112.02
salt & rental
40.90
police uniforms
326.85
contract payment
270.92
pocket parts for books
207.00
street materials
1675.36
$42,193.29
street lite $ 410.49
est #1 final 5132.00
est. #2 9201.17
est. #7 247.50
S 14,991.16
lawn seed mix $ 131.25
bond principal,interest & fee $119,117.25
interest and Fee
$5827.20
•
11
-5-
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE FUND
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Ed Phillips & Sons
Eagle Dist. Co.
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Ed Phillips &Sons
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Quality Wine & Spirits
Twin City Wine Co.
Coca Cola Bottling Co.
Bernicks Pepsi Cola
Northland Beverage
Tombstone Pizza Corp.
Henrys Candy Co.
Andy Lundholm
Triple G
Locher Bros.
Lenneman Beverages
Friendly Beverage Inc.
Retail Data System
Nationwide Papers
Minnesota Jaycees
Popps Electrical
Hutch Telephone
Mn. Dept. of Public Safety
Am. Linen Supply Co.
Sprengler trucking
City of Hutchinson
City of Hutchinson
Commissioner of Revenue
D.O.E.R.
PEP-4
City of Hutchinson
mix
$ 18.53
mix
17.76
mix
32.72
mix
17.05
wine & liquor
2180.32
wine & liquor
1845.61
wine & liquor
1798.62
wine & liquor
1409.05
mix
440.45
mix
52.50
mix & rental
285.50
supplies
24.00
supplies
422.06
supplies
86.70
beer & mix
10,345.65
beer & mix
6453.05
beer & mix
15,387.75
beer
1350.50
maintenance contract
1430.22
bags
181.05
advertising
37.50
light repair
50.49
phone
82.49
buyers card
12.00
towel service
32.79
trucking fees
314.11
payroll
4258.62
payroll
4094.04
sept. sales tax
7102.33
social security
280.75
contribution
165.07
insurance and fund transfer
20,960.26
$ 81,153.54
ATM ING ( INC.
People With Experience Who Care
&FILE: TWELVE OAKS CENTER SUITE 1009 P.O. BOX 129 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
October 31, 1986 _
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
4f ti
`K r
FOR YOUR
• (612) 473-4765
luU
er•�`
Dear Gary: Re: Numbers on side of building
it has been suggested by Mayor Ackland and also by your police
staff that it would be helpful to have numbers on the outside
of our buildings to identify condominium units by number.
This is a very good suggestion and I have asked our condominium
manager, Liz Brusehaver,and Margaret Knutson to obtain these
numbers and have them affixed as soon as possible. I have also
asked them to check with you and Dean and the homeowners to
determine the best size and also a exact locations. Presumably
the outside doors of each unit wo ld be the best location.
Sincerely,
ewell P. Weed, Jr.
cc: Mayor Ackland
Elizabeth Brusehaver
Margaret Knutson
SPECNLIZB413 IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RETIREMENT HOUSING 8 SERVICES
(612) 587 -5151
Ha�cyI CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 •
FOR YO
October 29, 1986 UR U 'P1��1�r
Mr. Martin Zieman
887 Oak Street
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Marie C. Ewald
107 Maple Street
Lester Praire, MN 55354
SUBJECT: Boarding and Lodging Home for the Elderly
Dear Marie Ewald:
The Hutchinson Planning Commission discussed correspondence that I sent to
you on October 6, 1986. They have directed me to tell you that they will
limit the number of handicapped who are not elderly, to one person under
existing authorization.
Specifically, I have reported to City Council that one individual is living at
your facility that is not "elderly" other than the caretakers; a handicapped
person that was previously transferred from the Cedar Crest facility.
In conclusion, if you add more than one non - elderly handicapped person under
your permit for "elderly ", you will need to process a seperate application
under city ordinance.
Thank You.
Sincerely,
Gary Dr Plot
City Administrator
cc: I*ayor and Council
Planning Commission
City Staff
City Attorney
GP /bb
(612) 587.5151
ffHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR YOUR INFORMATION
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
= MINN. 55350
In
M E M O
DATE: October 31, 1986 �W
TO: James Schaefer, City Attorney
FROM: Marlow V. Priebe, Director of Engineering
RE: City Sanitary Sewer Project Easement
An easement for sanitary sewer line and appurtenances is needed from the
following property owner:
Leonard & Gertrude Klammer
715 Harmony lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350
A City Project is being programmed, in conjunction with the project being
• handled by Donohue and Associates, that will relocate a section of sewer
line around a house on Harmony Lane.
The description of the easement is as follows:
A 30.00 foot wide strip of land on Lot 2, Klammer's Addition to the
City of Hutchinson.
The centerline of said 30.00 foot wide strip is described as beginning
at a point on the southerly line of said Lot 2, 15.0 feet
northeasterly of the southwest corner of Lot 2; thence northwesterly
to a point on the existing sanitary sewer line and there terminating.
Said point of termination is 45.0 feet northerly of the westerly line
of Lot 2 as measured along the existing sanitary sewer line.
This is the only easement needed for City Projects that are being proposed
in conjunction with a major project handled by Donohue and Associates.
Marlow V. Priebe
18 Director of Engineering
MVP /Pv /
cc: Gary Plotz '/
10 -29 -86
John E. Miller
336 South Main St.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
TO: /Utchinson City Council and Mayor
Planning Commission Members
Park and Recreation Board Members
City Attorney
City Administrator
City Engineer
a Oct
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The October 21 Planning Commission heard an appeal from Gordon Hedlund,
owner of Country Club Terrace, to abandon his playground in favor of putting
in four more mobile home pads. The Planning Commission opposed this request
and rightfully so.
I would urge every person serving on Civic Boards or Commissions that deal
with Parks and Playgrounds to hold the line on the 10% Park contribution. Every
outside developer wants to waive the contribution. What do they care about our
children? If Gordon Hedlund would make that space a viable neighborhood play-
ground his tenants wouldn't vote to close it, and he probably wouldn't have
vandalism, either.
I am very much opposed to a cash contribution in leiu of land. This is
directly in opposition to what our charter writers intended. The idea of a
contribution of 10% in land space was to provide neighborhood playgrounds for
our kids to use. The early Planning Commission adhered strictly to this rule
and that is why we have some wonderful playground areas in the South, the
Southeast, the North and the Northwest parts of our city. Now with the develo-
pers such as DeMeyer, Dickey, Helland, Compton, etc., we have witnessed cash
contributions rather than land. This may be feasible from the city's stand-
point, but it doesn't serve the needs of our children and also the need of
future generations.
I would like to appear before each of your governmental bodies to plead this
case. I think that we have a surplus of Park area and organized recreational
area in town and a shortage of smaller playground areas for our younger children.
Please deal with these guys the way the Charter intended and don't give in
to those who want to make a quick buck and leave our kids playing in the street.
7 Jon E. Mi 1 ler
0
•
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: October 31, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council FOR YOUR INFORMATION
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Hutchinson Water Treatment Plant
Standby Power
Attached is a copy of the Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc. report on the
possible use of the present Standby Power Unit at the Wastewater Treatment
Plant for the Wastewater Treatment Plant for the Water Treatment Plant when
said unit is no longer needed at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
•
MVP /pv
attachment
CC: Ralph Neumann
Dick Nagy
Randy DeVries
40
i
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
rieke
carroll
muller
associates, lnc.
architects
engineers
land surveyors
1011 first street south
post of`ce box 130
hopkins. minnesota 55343
612- 935 -6901
October 27, 1986
FOR YOUR INFORMATION*
Mr. Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Hutchinson Water Treatment Plant
Standby Power
Dear Mr. Priebe:
This letter is a summary of the investigation of the standby power
engine - generator set at the existing wastewater treatment plant. The
existing wastewater treatment plant is scheduled to be replaced with a
new facility and the City is interested in investigating the feasibility of
relocating the generator set to the water treatment plant.
The existing generator set was placed in service in 1968 by Ziegler, Inc.
of Minneapolis. The engine is a Caterpillar Model D343, serial number
62B584 and is fitted with a Woodward UG8 governor. The generator is
an Electric Machinery BEMAC II, 312 kVA, 250 kW, Frame 723 unit with
208, 240, 416, 480 volt characteristics, serial number 1- 68909731.
Information provided by Ziegler, Inc. indicates that the "starting" kVA of
this unit, skVA, is 250% of the running kVA, i.e., 780 skVA.
During the visual examination of the unit in the Fall of 1986 oxidation on
the silencer and exhaust system, oil on the rear of the engine - generator
set, specifically at the generator and in the vicinity of the turbocharger
at the rear of the engine was noted. Deterioration of rubber coolant
lines was apparent and the slab was wet with oil but this may have
accumulated from changing the oil in the engine.
As previously identified, the engine - generator set is capable of providing
250 kW, 312 kVA. Information provided by the Hutchinson Utilities
Commission indicates that the demand presented by the water treatment
plant for the period January, 1984 to September, 1986 ranges from a low
of 208 kW to a high of 320 kW. The maximum demand occurred in
February, 1984, perhaps the result of electric heating, with the second
high period during July, 1984 with a demand of 312 kW. As can be noted,
the generator set is incapable of operating the entire plant under these
conditions.
There are a number of options available to the City of Hutchinson to
provide standby power at the water treatment plant. The options
examined as a portion of this report include (1) installation of a new
standby generator set, (2) installation of the existing generator set in an
C
�J
Mr. Marlow V. Priebe
October 27, 1986
Page two
"automatic" configuration capable of operating the plant at reduced
capacity and (3) installation of the existing generator set in a "manual"
configuration.
These options are expanded in following paragraphs:
1. Installation of a new generator set
Existing records indicate the plant's maximum demand observed to
date is approximatley 320 kW. The demand will increase,
especially as new equipment is added, until the maximum capacity
of the plant is obtained. If it is assumed that the electrical
demand will increase to a maximum of 400 to 450 kW then the
following estimate based on current costs might be made:
450 kW generator set $50,000
Automatic transfer switch 22,500
Installation, fuel tank, misc. 25 000
Total equipment cost, installed 97,500
This estimate includes an outdoor generator in a weather resistant
enclosure with an automatic transfer switch inside the water
• treatment plant in proximity to the electrical equipment.
2. Installation of the existing generator set in an "automatic"
configuration.
This concept would include moving the existing generator set to
the water treatment plant and mounting it outside the facility. A
1600 amp automatic transfer switch would be installed so that the
plant could operate at full capacity when normal utility power is
available. The concept would include relaying that would "lock
out" pre - determined equipment, such as all but one high service
pump and one well pump, when the generator was operating. This
would permit automatic operation of the water treatment plant, at
reduced capacity, in the event of a power outage. Estimated costs
are as follows:
Automatic transfer switch $22,500
Rehabilitation of generator set 9,000
Installation, fuel tank 25,000
Relaying 7 500
Equipment and installation, total 64,000
If options 1 or 2 are pursued the City might consider an automatic
transfer switch with a bypass feature. This feature will permit
servicing of the transfer switch without a power interruption to the
40 water plant. This feature is approximately $18,000 more expensive
Mr. Marlow V. Priebe
October 27, 1986
Page three
than the cost of switch identified. If a transfer switch without the
bypass feature is purchased, a power outage will be required when
the transfer switch is serviced.
3. Installation of the existing generator set in a "manual"
configuration.
This concept includes relocating the generator set to the water
treatment plant. As in the previous example, the unit would be
mounted outside the building in its weather- resistant enclosure. A
manual switch, key interlocked with the main utility source
disconnect would be installed. In the event of a power failure,
operations personnel would have to go to the water treatment
plant, the main utility source disconnect would be opened and
locked out, the generator started and the standby switch closed.
Equipment would then be manually added to meet the demands of
the system within the generator set's capacity. When "normal"
power returned, the plant would manually be transferred to the
utility source.
Costs for this option are as follows:
Rehabilitation of generator set $ 9,000 •
Installation, fuel tank 18,000
Disconnect switch 3 000
Equipment and installation, total 30,000
Several items are of importance concerning the estimated costs.
Rehabilitation of the generator set includes shipping the unit to Ziegler
in Minneapolis and returning it to Hutchinson, the installation of a new
heater and coolant lines, new batteries, the installation of a generator
breaker, repair of the oil leak near the turbocharger, top -end inspection
and general repair and adjustment. The estimate does not include an
overhaul of the engine. At the time of this report parts for the engine
remain readily available. However, since the generator has not been
manufactured for several years, parts for the generator are becoming
scarce, depending on the part.
The estimates anticipate an outdoor unit in a weather- resistant
enclosure. When a unit is housed in this means periodic inspection,
particularly in the winter, and servicing are more difficult. As a result,
it is recommended that the generator set be housed inside an addition to
the building. When mounted inside, personnel can circulate around the
unit on a frequent basis and look for leaks, check oil and cooling levels
more frequently, etc. For conceptual purposes a building addition of
approximately 15 feet by 30 feet is proposed. Such an addition,
consistent in appearance with the remainder of the building is estimated •
to cost $45,000.
Mr. Marlow V. Priebe
October 27, 1986
Page four
•
It is recommended that the City consider the third option, re -use of the
existing machine, in a manual configuration. The generator set is not
capable of running the entire plant but long duration outages have not
been reported. Operating the plant at reduced capacity might be
acceptable for short duration outages. However, if full capacity
operation is determined to be required, the existing machine is not
capable of meeting the requirements. It is also recommended that the
unit be installed inside a building to facilitate inspection and servicing of
the engine - generator. It should be recognized that parts availability,
particularly on the generator, will become a problem and the generator
may need replacement sometime in the future when parts become
unavailable.
We trust this answers your immediate questions. If you require
additrmk41 information please advise.
Sincerel
l 6UL I. t ... LL 'r''
RIEKE CARROLL MULLEf ASSOCIATES, INC.
• PFK:mb
is
THE HUTAHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The Hutchinson Safety Council met at 12:00 noon on September 29, 1986 at the Fire
. Hall. Present were 9 members.
The meeting was called to order by President Gale Boelter, followed by silent
prayer.
The minutes of the July meeting were read and approved. No meeting was held in
August due to the booth at the County Fair. The treasurer's report was read and
filed for audit.
Our booth at the Fair was discussed at this time and it was decided if we have
the booth next year more will have to be done to attract people. One thing
suggested was a larger area where people could sit down.
The Awareness Program was brought up to see if progress has been made on it. Gary
Blythe has contacted companies for contact people.
Marlin Torgrimson reported that he did not think Hwy. #7 West would be finished
this fall due to the prolonged rain. Gale reported that the City may lose their
• Hackberry trees oh the Main Street curve of Hwy. #15 South when road is done there.
A note was made of the Rail Road Days in Hutchinson on October 18th. and 19th.
Also that 85% of Minnesota people want the 55 speed limit to remain.
Orville Kuiken made a motion for adjurnment, seconded be Loretta Pishney.
The Neat meeting will be October 27, 1986 at 12:00 noon at the Fire Hall.
Submitted By: Gale Boelter, President
Eileen Torry, Sec /Tres.
TREASURER'S REPORT: Balance on Hand as of 9/30/86 $171.24
Total Deposits .00
Disbursements .00
Balance on Hand $171.24
SAVINGS BALANCE as of 10/29/86 $151.87
•
*Excused absence
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Sanders. Buchanan /K.
Kubasch moved and seconded acceptance of the minutes of September 8, 1986.
Carried. Johnson /Buhr moved and seconded acceptance of the treasurer's report
Carried.
4 In addition to the Director's printed report, Mr. Sundberg stated he had hear(
from five governing units, comprising at least 508 of the population served,
I objecting to the 1987 proposed budget. Ms. Matson presented circulation and
registration statistics for September. She also reviewed the Minnesota Library
• Reciprocal Borrowing Compact Report for July, August, and September of 1986.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY
SYSTEM BOARD
MEETING
October
13, 1986
resent:
James Phalen, Graceville
Representing: Big Stone County
Stan Jacobson, Granite Falls
Chippewa County
Wayne Hebrink, Renville
Kandiyohi County
Rebecca Huseby, Pennock
Kandiyohi County
Lilah Buhr, Stewart
McLeod County
Kathleen Kubasch, Winsted
McLeod County
Milo Kubasch, Winsted
McLeod County
Howard Turck, Litchfield
Meeker County
Jerome Waters, Litchfield
Meeker County
Jeanne Lundstrom, Grove City
Meeker County
John Langen, Danvers
Swift County
Curtis Johnson, Appleton
Appleton
Rose Engebretson, Bird Island
Bird Island
Ethelyn Byhaug, Dawson
Dawson
Adelle Jacoby, Hector
Hector
Albert Linde, Hutchinson
Hutchinson
John Horrocks, Hutchinson
Hutchinson
Dale Smolnisky, Litchfield
Litchfield
Gladys Nelson, Ortonville
Ortonville
Linda Ulrich, Renville
Renville
LeRoy Sanders, Willmar
Willmar
Carol Conradi, Willmar
Willmar
Jeanette Buchanan, Willmar
Willmar
Burton Sundberg, Director
Katherine Matson, Associate Director
•
Also present: Robert Furan, Graceville
Absent:
Steve Boehlke, Montevideo*
Representing: Chippewa County
Paula Gilsrud, Montevideo*
Chippewa County
Orlynn Mankell, New London*
Kandiyohi County
Jean Stranberg, Atwater
Kandiyohi County
Kay Frederickson, Murdock*
Swift County
Laurie DeMarce, Benson
Benson
Lionel Barker, Glencoe*
Glencoe
Angelyne Montonye, Graceville*
Graceville
Shirley Schutt, Kerkhoven*
Kerkhoven
Delores Condon, Litchfield*
Litchfield
Anne Maguire, Madison
Madison
*Excused absence
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Chairman Sanders. Buchanan /K.
Kubasch moved and seconded acceptance of the minutes of September 8, 1986.
Carried. Johnson /Buhr moved and seconded acceptance of the treasurer's report
Carried.
4 In addition to the Director's printed report, Mr. Sundberg stated he had hear(
from five governing units, comprising at least 508 of the population served,
I objecting to the 1987 proposed budget. Ms. Matson presented circulation and
registration statistics for September. She also reviewed the Minnesota Library
• Reciprocal Borrowing Compact Report for July, August, and September of 1986.
The Public Library Newsletter and newspaper clippings were passed
staff fall workshop will be held October 30 in Montevideo. Agenda
"How to Forip a Friends of the Library Group" and "Ideas on How to
for Adults."
Hebrink /Conradi moved payment of bills. Carried.
around. A
items are
Do Programs
•
Committee and Project Reports;
1.A report from the "Meeker County Citizens for Library Service" group was
given by Carol Blunt. Total donations received were $4173.34, fund raising
activities raised $1388.97, and large donations totaled $3785.00, for a total
of $9343.31. Of this amount, $6,000 was presented to Pioneerland, making up
Meeker County's 1986 deficit. Congratulations were extended to the Meeker
County Committee for their efforts in this matter, and a word of thanks was
extended to all contributors to the fund.
2. Agreement Study Committee -- Gladys Nelson, chairman of the committee
presented the attached agreement and bylaws. Agreement changes were discussed
in detail. Section III was reviewed in full because Pioneerland would implemen
a two -part operating budget. Discussion followed as to whether operational
costs of the bookmobile should be an item under part I (system wide
expenditures) or under part II (local service expenditures). Bookmobile costs
were compared to the cost of a small library, with bookmobile cost being
approximately $1.00 per circulation. The vehicle is currently 11 years old and
in good condition. Nelson /Conradi moved and seconded that bookmobile service b
an expenditure item under Part I of the budget. Carried (16 ayes, 4 nayes).
Turck /Horrocks moved and seconded that the following be added at end of Sectio
III, 1, a, "Method of said reduction shall be arrived at by consultation
between the library board members and governing bodies of that jurisdiction an
the Pioneerland Library System Director." Carried. Nelson /Ulrich moved an
seconded approval of revised agreement with these changes. Carried. The se
bylaws will be placed on the agenda for the next meeting of the full board.
Mr. Sundberg was directed to take the Agreement as amended and changed to a
lawyer for review prior to sending to governing units.
Communications:
1. A thank you was received from Betty Anderson who just retired after 30 year
as Atwater librarian.
2. A letter was received from LDS that the final 15% of FY86 funds ($27,094)
will be sent to us prior to October 31.
3. Automation Project -- Mr. Sundberg was notified by the Otto Bremer
Foundation that our grant application will be reviewed when trustees meet next
time.
4. Attached are letters from five governing units opposing the 1987 budget
requests.
Old Business:
1. 1987 Budget -- The 1987 budget worksheet was reviewed by Mr. Sundberg. He
noted that even if the 1987 budget would be reduced to the 1986 level, the
amounts requested from governing units would be shifted somewhat due to new
EARC figures. After considerable discussion on how the previous 1987 budget
proposal would be reduced, Hebrink /Ulrich moved and seconded approval of a
revised 1987 budget amount of $942,138, which is $1,138 over the 1986 amount
$941,000 but $34,267 less than the previous 1987 amount.
� 1
U
New Business:
1. Legislative Breakfasts -- K. Matson presented the plans for two breakfasts
to be held Povember 15 at 8 :30 a.m. at the Victorian Inn in Hutchinson and
•November 22 at 8:30 a.m. at the Royale Inn in Montevideo. Included in the
invitation will be local school librarians, SAMMIE coordinator, and Bill Asp.
All board members are encouraged to attend.
2. A letter was read from Mary Doty asking for a volunteer to work on revisin
the Trustees Handbook.
The Executive Board will meet in November.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Jeanette Buchanan
Secretary
•
is
October 1986
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
Treasurer's Report Curtis Johnson, Treasurer
AUTOMATION
INCOME
BUDGET INCOME
BUDGET INCOME
6,660.00
MTD
YTD
MTD
YTD
BUDGET
Hector
188.00
S 34,668.55
S 90,395.34
6,077.00
Balance
Receipts:
332.00
2,684.25
10,737.00
*10,737.00
Basic State /Federal Aid
224.00
69,094.00
203,176.00
205,000.00
Big Stone County
658.00
5,574.25
22,297.00
22,297.00
*Chippewa County
2,123.00
18,318.75
73,275.00
*73,275.00
Kandiyohi County
24,551.25
98,205.00
98,205.00
McLeod County
2,403.00
15,740.00
62,960.00
62,960.00
Meeker County
9,802.25
56,882.00
62,773.00
Swift County
999.00
8,152.75
32,611.00
32,611.00
Appleton
376.00
2,195.00
8,780.00
8,780.00
Benson
548.00
4,390.00
17,560.00
17,560.00
Glencoe
659.00
5,758.00
23,032.00
23,032.00
Graceville
117.00
978.00
3,912.00
3,912.00
Hutchinson
1,387.00
12,571.50
50,286.00
50,286.00
Kerkhoven
114.00
940.75
3,763.00
3,763.00
Litchfield
886.00
9,618.50
38,474.00
38,474.00
Ortonville
382.00
3,227.25
12,909.00
12,909.00
Willmar
2,384.00
20,087.50
80,350.00
80,350.00
Bird Island
206.00
1,665.00
6,660.00
6,660.00
( *Dawson
285.00
2,306.75
9,227.00
* 9,227.00
Hector
188.00
1,519.25
6,077.00
6,077.00
j*Madison
332.00
2,684.25
10,737.00
*10,737.00
Renville
224.00
1,811.75
7,247.00
7,247.00
•
j Cash Receipts
3,354.95
35,398.08
48,000.00
Gifts
6,072.60
6,746.60
j Interest
464.19
5,993.04
9,000.00
` Reimbursements (local govt)
*Chippewa County
8,007.00
32,028.00
*32,028.00
*Dawson
1,348.50
5,394.00
* 5,394.00
*Madison
862.25
3,449.00
* 3,449.00
Benson
700.00
700.00
Other Reimbursements
130.00
4,572.78
6,994.00
Other
Total Receipts
14,171.00
241,226.24
922,701.70
941,700.00
Other funds:
Glencoe Fund
4,022.00
Automation Grant (LSCA)
11,998.00
Swift County Est. Grant (LSCA)
10,175.00
Implementation Grant (1985 - State)
1,840.00
Raymond Project (Bremer Grant &
Mielke Estate)
82,619..13
57,619.13
KCWL
200.00
1,736.00
TOTAL RECEIPTS & BALANCE:
$275,894.79
$1,095,916.17
$1,029,090.13
• Automation Totals
$14,171.00
$19,505.00
TOTAL RECEIPTS, BALANCE, AUTOMATION
MTD & YTD
$275,894.79
$1,110,087.17
$1,048,595.13
Page 1 (OVER)
October 1986 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM TREASURER'S REPORT (Continued)
EXPENDITURESs
_ - -- - ---
MTO
YTO
% OF EXP
CUR !!T
9XNUiTUaF;
-Ptt- 4nf,K?f- TOT_ft
ELw --
-- �
ACCT GROUP..•
•00
.00
•OC%
_00
L181iTiiY
-- -.
PERSONAL SEkVICES
SALARIES AND GAGED
519210.37
511,212.99
82.95;
6199294.00
__
HEALTi9 U;ijkLICE
I
19438-57 6.9 4
72.63%
2 0.00
HEALTH INSURA•,CC - DEDUCTIRLE
219.69
19768.21
0 42.LC%
9V9
49200.00
__ RE?l�'E9£NT
49652.57
46#622.83 46#622.83
83.26%
569000.00
�nf-
yR�P••• r3'f1.1b - $'/6iTi9•'J7�2.0� ---
7024794.00
MATt *IALS
29262.61
57,607.06
101.09%
57,275.00
eGOKS - CHILDREN
314.45
119950.52
?i.3C%
160760.66-
GEVEPAL REFERENCE
375.00
5#815.44
116.11%
59OCC.00
_ !RRIDUICALS_ - _ _
320.93
229147.38
1C5.4ti
219OCO.00
PAMPHL9TS
CO
350.00
__ 116.67%
.30 -6 _ 0.0
SWIFT CGUNTY VAT'KtALS
116.44
5,418.24
90.30%
6,000.00
_ RENSON LIBRARY MATERIALS
19.16
370.03
52.86%
700.00
811M 6 l6MM FILMS
•Qb
_
3,873.00-- 923X- ��ifC0.30
VIDEO DISCS L TAPES
41.42
29210.86
32.51%
6r8C0.00
AUDIC DISCS AND TAPES
.00
66.71
68.714
ICO.00
Li0E5 i�i<3 FILM -tTRIPS
_ .
.00
UCZ -- -150'ZO'
MICROFORMS
.00
125.00
Oct .
.00
B14DINi _
-
.00
660.51
69.53%
950.00
ACCT ROU. ...
3,4 1.11
11Ct6'13-T
.� !izoi
CATALOGING
OCLC AND OT__HER CHARGES
.00
179263.70
95.91 %
18,000.00
Cb" YE1LIUA CHAAGE3
I 99M .61
12 #4 3-6-.-4'4
116.492
9371�6-
ACCT GROUP•..
- 19901.61
29,694.14
103.57%
289671.00
VEHICLES
__
OFEAA'.1017 AGO 9AI.ITE. 4CE
1,359.49
129817. T
S.40f 174500.00
.It. SUP. A%CE -
-
175.32
19445.34
96.42%
195"0
AHORTI'_ATI_N__- _ _ - --
_
.00
8,108.25
202.71%
49 C
ACCT GROUP...
19534.81
22.372.16
99.436
__
22, .00
CONMUNILATICN
___TELEPHONE AND LIVE CHARGES_
829_17_
8,188.78
90.99%
99000.00
TEkriNA1. ifmfth4I CE
.00
.00
.DOX
1,4C0.00
PGSTAG= AND SHIPPING
683.51
69913.36
86.42%
89000.00
ACCT GROUP...
1,512.68
15,102.14
82.08%
1894CO.00
. PfaT
Et1UI
NEW EQUIPMENT -
43.33
1.391.25
69.56%
2.000.00
_ A/V Egl11PMENT
.00
422.00
60.29%
700.07_.
.MAINTE4E4CE AYO CONTRACTS
858.8
11.018.1 -- 9 -----8.B6%
_
ACCT GROUP...
902.16
129831.44
84 .99%
159100.00
OTHER -
_
_
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND EOUtPM. Elul
14T.3�
1,- 0`38.96
103�Of
^-- T-O"O86
SLPPLIES ANG PRINTING
936.23
17.820.69
75.83%
2395CO.00
- PRCNOTICNAL AND PROGRAMMING
343.27
871.52
500.00
MILE /G9 Ahu MEET Inr - STAFF
_ _
� 284.37
_
5.6`"9.39
_174.30%
101.46%
__ _
- 59775.00
MILEAGE AND YE£TINGS - TRUSTEES
513.34
2,6 ?2.78
90.09%
30200.00
PkGF. 'lEkeERSHIPS (TRUSTEES)
.00
560.00
109.80%
SIO.00
INSUPANCE
.00
79491.31
117.05%-
6.400.00
-4o3-A iO- CEGAC"719j'FIL1:T- -
Z45:'0�- X75
- AUDITING -
.00
- 19387.40
115.62%
1,200.00
BOOKKEEPING
225.00
29250.00
75.00 %.
39000.00
C3QTINUI U A N
•
ACCT GROUP...
29489.63
40.695.28
89.69%
459375.00
SPECIAL
- GCEiICUE FiFfETJbf3 i 498
4Y�II2T.-O-0
KCWL '.
.00
.00
.00%
11736.00-
STUDY
.00
1,170.00
63.594
19840.00
_ _SAL..RY
ITUT-OMAnON FUND K CAL)
-- .a0- �:77�.b0�T.SE -- 194505.03
AUTOMATION GRANT ISTAT €)
.00
39323.70
27.7C%
119998.00
THE QAYMOND PROJECT
.CO
82,619.13
143.39%
5796
--
ACCT
96:723 -_
OR9;. TOTAL...
6 *9313.40
9039.505.78
86.16%
1,048,595.13
ENDING CASH BALANCE
$206,581.39
$206,581.39
Page 2
0
Notice is hereby given that the Hutchinson City Council
will meet in closed session at 5:15 p.m. on the 30th day
of October, 1986, at City Hall Council Chambers, 37
Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, MN 55350.
The purpose of said meeting is to discuss with legal counsel
threatened or pending civil litigation involving the office
of Police Chief.
City Ac
tUnistrator