cp03-24-1987 c1--IUTCHINSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
bl.n ai '<'2 - TO Marcel 28
.1997
WEDNESDAY
-25-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meet
at City Hall
SUNDAY
-22-
THURSDAY
-26-
5:30 P.M. - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
MONDAY
-23-
FRIDAY
-27-
VACATION & SEMINAR
RANDY DEVRIES - March 23-27
GARY PLOTZ - Comp. Time
March 25-27
DEAN O'BORSKY - Police Chiefs
Seminar - March 24-26;
Vacation March 27 -April 17
TUE35AY
-24-
2:00 P.M. - Open Bids at City
Hall for 1987 Im-
provement Projects
7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting
at City Hall
SATURDAY
-28-
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 1987
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Walter D. Marth, Peace Lutheran Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 10, 1987; Bid
Openings of MarchT77--an-d March 18, 1987
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - February 1987
2. Library Board Minutes dated March 10, 1987
3. Tree Board Minutes dated February 4, 1987
4. Planning Commission Minutes dated February 17, 1987
5. Hospital Board Minutes dated February 17, 1987
(b) Request For Reduced Trash And Refuse Rate
• (c) Use of Library Square For Summer Band Concert Series
Action - Motion to order minutes and report filed, approve rate
reduction and use of Library Square
5. Public Hearing - 8_00 P.M.
None
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Update On Library Square Renovation Project By City Forester
Action -
(b) Consideration Of Reimbursement For Training For Engineering Technician
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) Consideration Of Request For Street Light On Rolling Greens Lane
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and refer to Utilities
(d) Consideration Of Special Recognition For Retiring Firefighters
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to present "Certificate Of
Appreciation" and Coat of Arms plaque
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 24, 1987 0
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 8470 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration Of Awarding Bid For Skid Steer Loader
(DEFERRED MARCH 17, 1987)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid
(b) Consideration Of Awarding Bid For Two Police Patrol Cars
(DEFERRED MARCH 17, 1987)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid
(c) Consideration Of Request By Galen Witte For Authorization To Haul
And Dispose Of Construction And Other Materials Within City Limits
(DEFERRED MARCH 10, 1987)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve authorization •
(d) Consideration Of Establishing A Special City Council Meeting Date
To Review And Award Police Station Bids
Action -
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) Consideration Of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration Of Date Of June 19, 1987 For Board Of Review Meeting
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve date and time
(c) Consideration Of Modification To Aeration Room Ventilation at Water
Treatment Plant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve proposal
(d) Consideration Of Executing Agreement For Force Main Easement Between
Lorraine Treinen And City Of Hutchinson
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement
Q
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 24, 1987
(e) Consideration Of "Consent To Release Of Funds" To James H. Schaefer By
Frank J. Fay And Curtis E. Burckhardt
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and authorize release of
funds
(f) Consideration Of 1987 Proposal For Hutchinson Senior Center Nutrition
Program
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract
(g) Consideration Of Entering Into Farm Program Agreement With Chris
Kadelbach For City -Owned Property
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and authorize signing
agreement
(h) Consideration Of Payment For Removal Of Parking Lot Light At Big Bear
Site
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve payment by City
• (i) Consideration Of Amendment To Zoning Ordinance No. 464, Section 6.01
And 6.02 With Favorable Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive first reading
of Ordinance and set second reading April 14, 1987
(j) Consideration Of Review Of Comprehensive Plan With Favorable
Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plan with change
(k) Consideration Of Annexation Proposed By Frank Fay With Favorable
Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve referral to Minnesota
Municipal Board - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8469
(1) Consideration Of Renewal Of Intoxicating Liquor Licenses:
1. Spankys/D'Vinci's
2. Gold Coin
3. O'Tooles
4. The Sheep Shedde
5. The Victorian Inn
6. Peter's On The Park
• Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue licenses
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 24, 1987
(m) Consideration Of Merit Requests For First Quarter Of 1987
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve recommendations
(n) Consideration Of Section Breakdown For Mapping And Planning
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve work
(o) Consideration Of Hercules Incorporated Use Of Extra Capacity In
Hutchinson's New Wastewater Treatment Plant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve on temporary basis
(p) Consideration Of Approving Plans And Specifications For 1987
Improvement Projects And Ordering Advertisement For Bids
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifications
and open bids April 22, 1987 at 2:00 P.M. - Motion to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8471
(q) Consideration Of New Well And High Service Pump For Water Department
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement
with RCM
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
4
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1987
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Alderman Mike Carl s, Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Mar-
lin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Mikulecky and Mayor Paul L. Ackland. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering Marlow V.
Priebe, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Walter D. Marth.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of February 24, 1987 and special meeting/
workshop of February 24, 1987 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1987
2. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES DATED JANUARY 27, 1987
• (b) REQUEST FOR REDUCED TRASH AND REFUSE RATE
(c) GAMBLING LICENSE FOR GOPHER CAMPFIRE AT VICTORIAN INN
(d) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS:
1. PLANNING COMMISSION - WILLIAM CRAIG (MARCH 1990)
2. CITY TREE BOARD - DON SCHUMACHER (MARCH 1990)
3. LIBRARY BOARD - DELORES BRUNNER (APRIL 1990)
BILL SCHERER (APRIL 1990)
ROXANNE WIGEN (APRIL 1990)
4. HOSPITAL BOARD - ROBERT DURFEE (MARCH 1989)
DORI JOHNSON (MARCH 1990)
DIANE GILMER (MARCH 1991)* *NEW
RICHARD MYERS (MARCH 1992)* APPOINTMENTS
REV. THOR SKEIE (MARCH 1993)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to order the minutes and report filed, approve rate reduction, issue
license and ratify appointments. Motion unanimously carried.
. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
None.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 10, 1987
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) PRESENTATION OF PAYROLL DEDUCTION PLAN FOR SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH
INSURANCE
Jon Hansen and Bruce Kopesky, of American Family Life Assurance Com-
pany, presented a payroll deduction plan for supplemental health insur-
ance. It was the consensus of the Council that 10 percent of the full-
time employees, or approximately eight employees, must enroll in the
plan to make it effective.
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the payroll deduction plan for sup-
plemental health insurance. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and car-
ried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF VOLUNTARY PAYROLL DEDUCTION FOR TAX SHELTER ANNUITIES
Following discussion of Prudential's voluntary payroll deduction in-
vestment program, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to approve the
voluntary payroll deduction. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and
unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 8468 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Alderman Torgerson moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8468. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO POST SIGN FOR YEARLY
SWAP MEET
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded
by Alderman Mikulecky, to approve the sign for the March 1987 swap
meet. Motion unanimously carried.
Alderman Carls moved that the request be made annually and conform to
the City ordinance in effect. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky
and carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY GALEN WITTE FOR AUTHORIZATION TO HAUL AND
DISPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER MATERIALS WITHIN CITY LIMITS
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls to refer the
request to the City Attorney for a recommendation. Alderman Mlinar
seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 10, 1987
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO HOLD SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING TO REVIEW BIDS
ON POLICE FACILITIES
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to review the bids at
the regular meeting on March 24, 1987. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF WAGE ADJUSTMENT FOR TREASURER OF FIRE DEPARTMENT
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the wage adjustment. Motion seconded
by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTING AGREEMENTS FOR FORCE MAIN EASEMENTS
1. J. HAROLD & MYRLE BEYTIEN
2. GOEBEL FIXTURES COMPANY
3. CLARICE A. MCKIMM
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, to approve and enter into agreements. Motion carried unani-
mously.
• City Attorney Anderson reported the problem with the title for the
Treinen property would be resolved shortly, and the easement agreement
would be ready for the next meeting. Also, the purchase agreement for
the Dennis Potter property was ready for signature.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF RURAL FIRE PUMPER AGREEMENTS WITH TOWNSHIPS
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve and enter
into 10 -year agreements. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and car-
ried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT/
AMENDMENT FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Mayor Ackland read a news release which stated the City of Hutchinson
would receive a $6,943,995 Step 3 construction grant from the U.S. EPA.
in addition to a separate $285,000 grant from the State of Minnesota.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to approve and authorize signing the agreement. Motion unanimously
carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
• City Administrator Plotz reported on a recent meeting with Donohue &
Associates regarding the financing for the wastewater treatment plant.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 10, 1987
Administrator Plotz commented on the airport land agreement with Eugene
Birk and that he was in arrears on his lease payment to the City. To
date, Mr. Birk had not requested to rent the land for 1987. There-
fore, Mr. Plotz questioned if he should advertise the airport farmland
for rent in 1987. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to
authorize the City Administrator to proceed. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Carls and carried unanimously.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS
Alderman Carls inquired about the status of applicants for the City
Engineer position. Also, he asked if the March 31 and April 1 City
Council joint meetings with the Utilities Commission and County Board
officials respectively were still scheduled. In addition, Alderman
Carls wanted to know when the Planning Commission would review the sign
ordinance.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Anderson reported he had been contacted by one other bar
owner regarding the liquor license at Spankys and whether it was in
compliance. If the Council was agreeable, he would provide the Le-
Fevere law firm with information and obtain an opinion from them. At- •
torney Anderson thought an independent party should write the Attorney
General for a legal opinion on the matter.
Alderman Torgerson moved to discuss the issue in two weeks if there was
an answer. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Priebe reported on a recent meeting with the County Board re-
garding the County Ditch 18 issue. He hoped to have some additional
information for the next Council meeting.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland stated he had received a request for a "Children Playing"
sign to be posted in the vicinity of the Credit Union on Adams Street.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Motion
unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT •
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:26 P.M.
4
mng=
• BID CPENING
7 MSDAY, MARCH 17, 1987
2:00 P.M.
n
LJ
•
Mayor Paul Ackland called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
Present in addition to Mayor Ackland were City Administrator
Gary Plotz, Finance Director Ken Merrill, Maintenance Director
Ralph Neumann and Motor Pool Supervisor Doug Meier.
Mayor Ackland waived reading of the Advertisement for Bids
and asked City Adninistrator Plotz to open bids for (1) Police
Car and (2) Skid Steer Loader.
Results of the bids are recorded on the attached Bid Tabulation
sheets.
Bids were referred to Maintenance Director Neumaim for review
and reoamiendation to the City Council on March 24, 1987.
Meeting was adjourned at 2:25 p.m.
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTING NO.
PROJECT POLICE GAR
DATE 3-17-87
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
Plo man's, Inc.
26,264 less
(20,414 net)
I
recd late
1:35 o.m.
rec'd late
1:50 n.m.
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTING NO.
DATE 3-17-87
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
1) -
#1 Steven Perschau
2) -
3) 1239
1) 17,650
#2
2) 14,500
Lano Eq igmnt
3) -
Norwood M
1) -
Prieve Landscaping & Nursery
2) -
#3 Hutchinson, M[4
3) 1550
L & P Supply Co.
1) 17,952.25
Hutchinson, MDI
2) 15,259
#4
3) -
1) 16,093
14,593
Bong Lake Ford Tractor
3)
2073 W. Wayzata Blvd, Lang lake
1) 15,824.55
KortvEm's Sales , Service, Fen
2) 13,324.55
5839 Hw1, 12 West
3)3) 2500
Hanle Plain, IV 55344
1) -
Farm Rite Equipment
2) 12,672
1-1. avy 12, Box 26
3)
Dassel, MN 55325 Bid -1
faun Rite Equj�xmt Bid -L
1) -
2) 16,064
3) -
Litchfield Irmlenent
1) 16,949
Litchfield, Du
2) 13,449
3) -
Carlson Tractor & Equignent Co.
1) 16,400
15125 So. Robert Tr.
2) 15,200
Rosanount, 141 55068
3) -
1) -
#11 Don Alsleben
2) -
3 2001
Ll
•
• MINUTES
BID OPENING
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18, 1987
1J
•
City Administrator Plotz called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.M. Present
were: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill,
Committee Chairman Dick Burgart, Virgil Florhaug of CAM, and Administrative
Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
Following the reading of the Notice of Advertisement, the bid opening for the
police station was turned over to Mr. Florhaug from Construction Analysis And
Managment Inc.
A listing of the bid tabulations are available for review in City Hall. The CAM
firm will present a recommendation to the City Council within the next week.
■
FEBRUARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1987
FEBRUARY
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
9814.26
MONTH -FEB.
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
1319.25
1314700.00
13133BO.75
0.00
LICENSES
1370.00
1425.00
16950.00
15525.00
0.08
PERMITS AND FEES
2333.81
2653.81
66900.00
64246.19
0.04
INTER -GOVERNMENT REVENUE
7192.50
21986.00
1087494.00
1065508.00
0.02
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
19406.66
54644.65
508144.00
453499.35
0.11
FINES & FORFEITS
2942.90
5764.83
29600.00
23835.17
0.19
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
9849.85
17120.10
131800.00
114679.90
0.13
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
2703.42
0.00
429000.00
429000.00
0.00
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
127.16
136.04
500.00
363.96
0.27
TOTAL
43222.88
105049.68
3565088.00
3480038.32
0.03
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
,�-t,M
MAYOR & COUNCIL
2021.94
8350.03
31467.00
23116.97
0.27
CITY ADM./CITY CLERK
9814.26
24646.46
133954.00
109307.54
0.18
ELECTIONS
0.00
0.00
4850.00
4850.00
0.00
FINANCE
16621.24
32443.12
197266.00
164824.88
0.16
MOTOR VEHICLE
6572.95
14506.07
66037.00
51530.93
0.22
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
19700.00
19700.00
0.00
LEGAL
6249.68
7991.54
32807.00
24815.46
0.24
PLANNING
178.00
10318.27
11375.00
1056.73
0.91
CITY HALL
2703.42
6448.64
40083.00
33634.36
0.16
•
RECREATION BUILDING
3121.03
7444.00
66470.00
59026.00
0.11
POLICE DEPARTMENT
51765.06
130704.42
741043.00
610338.58
0.18
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1653.41
12226.17
91585.00
79358.83
0.13
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
1994.02
5678.40
37650.00
31771.60
0.16
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
5997.50
16013.83
81346.00
65332.17
0.20
CIVIL DEFENSE
0.00
0.00
825.00
825.00
0.00
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
FIRE MARSHALL
2757.BO
7232.42
41023.00
33790.5B
0.18
ENGINEERING
12455.69
32401.33
192643.00
160241.67
0.17
STREETS & ALLEYS
19813.83
47626.18
359103.00
311474.82
0.13
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
5534.64
11681.74
70700.00
59018.26
0.17
LIBRARY
1004.74
14496.25
64696.00
50199.75
0.22
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
3200.14
7700.53
53690.00
45969.47
0.14
PARK/REC. ADMIN.
5701.37
15003.75
87392.00
72388.25
0.17
RECREATION
6693.08
15248.01
128122.00
112873.99
0.12
CIVIC ARENA
14083.71
28758.33
114172.00
85413.67
0.25
PARK DEPARTMENT
18300.19
53731.12
362092.00
30B360.6B
0.15
CEMETERY
2244.67
5384.95
43790.00
38405.05
0.12
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2052.97
6069.36
33150.00
27080.64
0.18
DEBT SERVICE
1500.00
3000.00
50396.00
47396.00
0.06
AIRPORT
8896.57
13087.88
50572.00
37484.12
TRANSIT
5460,65
1.3787.39
121734.00
107946.61
0.1i
COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
690.85
1870.27
0.00
-1870.27
ER.R0R
UNALLOCATED
1456.35
34206.84
255203.00
220996.16
0.13
•
TOTAL
220739.16
5BB259.30
3585088.00
2996828.70
0.16
,�-t,M
dr -G
FEBRUARY CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1987 FEBRUARY
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
532.31
MONTH -FEB.
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
LIQUOR SALES
28309.16
59586.30
390000.00
330413.70
0.15
WINE SALES
8834.09
17983.06
135000.00
117016.94
0.13
BEER SALES
37447.21
76942.69
635000.00
558057.31
0.12
BEER DEPOSITS
-115.32
-12.94
0.00
12.94
53299.62
MISC. SALES
2385.42
4673.29
0.00
-4673.29
0.00
INTEREST
254.69
254.69
5200.00
60000.00
0.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
-219.02
-400.33
0.00
400.33
0.00
kalm l
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
SUPPLIES. REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
DEBT SERVICE
TRANSFERS
COST OF SALES
• OTHER
TOTAL
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER/FUND
76896.23 159026.76 1165200.00 1006173.24 0.14
9505.26
27371.76
141670.00
114298.24
0.19
504.50
532.31
4800.00
4267.69
0.11
1205.13
2329.11
35640.00
33510.89
0.06
0.00
273.00
9100.00
B827.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
42500.00'
42500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ERROR
0.00
0.00
110000.00
110000.00
0.00
53299.62
122775.05
877000.00
754224.95
0.14
5289.76
0.00
6604.00
6604.00
0.00
64514.51 153281.23 1227514.00 1074232.77 0.12
FEDERAL GRANTS
608.00
608.00
0.00
-608.00
0.00
WATER SALES
35749.24
69454.64
460000.00
390545.16
0.15
WATER METER SALES
225.00
450.00
7000.00
6550.00
0.06
REFUSE SERVICES
29136.48
52711.334
328000.00
275288.66
0.16
SEWER SERVICES
43731.18
86269.37
615000.00
528730.63
0.14
EPA SALES
36952.55
733395.55
450000.00
PENALTY CHARGES
703.67
1710.24
7000.00
5289.76
0.00
INTEREST EARNED
0.00
0.00
60000.00
60000.00
0.00
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
643.00
2000.00
1357.00
0.00
OTHER
643.99
835.11
150.00
-685.11
5.57
TOTAL
147750.11
286077.45
1929150.00
1643072.55
0.15
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER%FUND
REFUSE
27521.65
55043.30
325000.00
269956.70
0.17
WATER
26B49.87
45253.32
884040.00
838786.68
0.05
• SEWER
76390.47
184505.95
688483.00
503977.05
0.27
TOTAL
130761.99
284802.57
1897523.00
1612720.43
0.15
March 10, 1987
•The library board met at 5:00 P.M. in the library meeting room with the following
members present: Ralph Bergstrom, Elaine Clay, Terry Eilertson, Larry Ladd,
Albert Linde, and Mary Henke.
The tree renovation project for Library Square was outlined by Mark Schnobrich,
city forester, and Jerry Brown, Tree Board chairman. The condition of the trees
in the park is deteriorating rapidly and a seven year renovation plan is being
proposed. The 1928 landscaping plans for the square were shown and the new project
would restore the park to its original condition. The project would be done in
seven phases:
Phase 1 East to west walk leading to the library entrance on Main St.
Phase 2 South side of park
vJesr
Phase 3 East side of the park
Phase 4 North side of the park
Phases 5-7 Crosswalks
Plans for the renovation project are being kept in the library workroom for exam-
ination by library board members unable to attend the meeting. Firstate Federal
• Savings and Loan Association will fund the entire renovation project. Elaine moved
we approve the plan as presented by Mark and Jerry. Larry seconded the motion. The
motion was voted on and passed.
The need for art work above the fireplace was the next item of business. Ralph asked
the board to consider possibilities and bring ideas to the next board meeting.
Paintings done by Ruth Peterson for Citizen's Bank were going to looked into.
Myron Clapp, library custodian, submitted bids he has received for cleaning the
carpeting and washing the windows in the upper level of the library, for the
board's consideration. Bids were received from Norton's Special Tasks, Dave's
Tri -Minnick, and Pro P:aintenance. After discussion, 'ferry moved we award the carpet
cleaning job to Pro Aaintenance who submitted the low bid of ii 625.46, as recommended
by Clapp. Elaine seconded the motion. The motion was voted on and passed. Terry
then moved we award the window washing job to Dave's Tri -Minnick who submitted the
low bid of -4 75.00, as recommended by Clapp. Larry seconded the motion. The motion
was voted on and passed.
•
4-4. (02)
Ralph reported thea small refrigerator had been purchased for the staff lounge. He
also recognized the efforts of Norita Levy for her work with the Aid association for
Lutherans Benefit Fund and Mary Henke and Linda Willmsen for their work on the
Sno-Break Art Show.
Librarian Mary Henke brought up the need for display boards on which to hang art
works. She will obtain more information on tie display boards and present it
at the next board meeting.
Elaine moved the meeting be adjourned. Terry seconded the motion. Motion passed.
Respectfully submitted,
l*?� ms*/_ ,
Secretary Pro -Tem
•
0
1]
TREE BOARD MINUTES
February 4, 1987
Recreation Center
4:30 PM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Roy Johnsen, Pat Mikulecky, Murray Swenson, Don Schumacher,
Jerry Brown, Mark Schnobrich
LIBRARY SQUARE LIGHTING
The lighting in Library Square was well received by the public during the
Christmas season of 1986-87. Five elms and two spruce trees were lit up with
numerous small white lights. The city is hoping that the light display can be
added to each year.
HAZARDOUS TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
A new form was adapted to notify homeowners of trees on their property that are
considered a hazard to people or property. The notice is just to inform them
.that a tree is a potential hazard. The city has no authority to fine or force
removal of the tree by serving the notice. It's intent is to request the tree
owner to take action to eliminate the problem.
•
1987 TREE ORDER
The Arbor Day boulevard tree order for spring 1987 has been made. Due to the
purchase of larger B & B size trees for the city owned downtown parking lot
located at 1st Avenue Southwest and Franklin, the city was not able to plant as
many trees on the boulevards this spring as in the past.
TREE BOARD PARTICIPATION IN SPRING LEAF & GRASS
Tabled until next meeting
LIBRARY SQUARE MASTER PLAN
The adopted Master Plan by the Tree Board was agreed upon and the plan will be
forwarded to the Parks & Recreation Board for their approval. Don Schumacher
suggested contacting all the branches of Aid Association for Lutherans for
possible funding to help reach the goal of $2,500. The $2,500 will be used to
purchase 18 flowering crab trees which will be planted after the removal of
approximately 6 trees from the park.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:35 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Schnobrich
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 17, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Roland Ebent at 7:30 p.m.
with the following members present: Bruce Drahos, Spencer Beytien, Tan
Lyke, Larry Romo, Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young and Chairman Ebent. Also
present: City Engineer Marlow Priebe, City Administrator Gary Plotz
and City Attorney Barry Anderson.
MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, January 20, 1987. Seconded by Dr. Lyke the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY BRIAN HUDSON
Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:31 pm. with the reading of
publication #3653 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
February 5, 1987. The request is for a Con�dit�iona-T Use Permit to
• allow the owner to move a 1984, 14'x76' Schult mobile home on
property located at 488 California St.
Engineer Priebe explained the reason for conditional use permits
requested on California St.
After discussion Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing. Seconded
by Mr. Drahos, the hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Romo made a
motion to recommend approval to the City Council. Seconded by Mrs.
Young the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE REQUEST SUBMITTED
BY DON HANTGE, TRI -COUNTY WATER
Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3648 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
January 8, 1987 and the reading of pub aTriction #3654 as published in
the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, February 5, 1987. A conditional
use permit requested to allow the owner to relocate Tri -County
Water to property located on Hwy 7 West. A variance was requested to
reduce the setback from 65' to 50' for a loading dock on proposed
construction on the south side of property located at Hwy 7 West.
Staff was questioned on the recommendation for a 55' variance.
• Engineer explained that a 55' setback would keep the trucks parked at
the loading dock off the roadway.
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
2/17/87
Mr. Hantge explained that there would be expansion problems to the •
north with a 55' setback.
Discussion followed. Mr Torgerson moved to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mr. Beytien the hearing closed at 7:40 pm. Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the 50' setback to
the City Council. Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried with a 5
to 2 vote.
Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend approval of the conditional use
permit to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried
unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF PORTABLE SIGN ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED BY HOMER PITTMAN
Mr. Plotz opened discussion by explaining the reasons for using the
Zoning Administrator as the enforcement person for the portable sign
ordinance and that a 90 day time limit would be easier to administer
than a 30 day or 60 day limit.
Discussion followed. Mr. Torgerson suggested ordering a booklet put
out by the National Electric Sign Association pertaining to the sign
problems. It was the consensus of the commission to table discussion •
until staff had time to look at the booklet and make recommendations
to the Planning Commission.
5. NEW BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF ZONING ADMINISTRATION ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED BY HOMER
PITTMAN
It was the consensus of the Commission to ammend the ordinance as
recommended by staff. Attorney Anderson explained the penalty change
from $300 to $700 as being consistent with the misdemeanor laws.
Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend approval of the ammendment to City
Council and set a Public Hearing. Seconded by Dr. Lyke the motion
carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY TO REVIEW THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Engineer Priebe explained the request by Hutchinson Technology for a
roadway off Hwy. 7. This would necessitate a change in the
Comprehensive Plan from commercial to industrial the area by Wigen's
Chevrolet.
Mr. Plotz stated his understanding of Hutchinson Technology's .
thoughts of expansion and also suggested that changing the
2
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
2/17/87
• Comprehensive Plan could possibly help in the annexation process
should the need arise in that area.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend the staff revise
the Comprehensive Plan for presentation at the March meeting.
Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried unanimously.
(c) DISCUSSION OF EXPANSION AT TACO JOHN'S
The manager of Taco John's presented the Commission with drawings of
the proposed expansion at the restaurant. After discussion it was
the consensus of the Commission to go ahead with the plan by
consulting with the City Engineer as to the permits and applications
that are necessary for the expansion.
(d) ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Chairman Ebent moved to elect Dr. Lyke as the new chairman of the
Hutchinson Planning Commission. Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to elect Mr. Romo as the vice chairman.
Seconded by Mrs. Young the motion carried unanimously.
• Mrs. Young moved to elect Mr. Drahos as secretary. Seconded by Mr.
Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
•
6. OTHER BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF MEMO BY GARY PLOTZ CONCERNING STAFFING AT PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETINGS
Mr. Plotz opened discussion by giving reasons for suggesting that
the Building Official represent staff at Planning Commission
meetings with the Engineer, Fire Marshall and City Administrator
attending as needed.
(b) COUNTY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SCHMELING REZONING
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to refer to council with no objection the
rezoning requested by F.H. Schmeling. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the
motion carried unanimously.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no futher business the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
M
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
• REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - February 17, 1987
Large Conference Room - 5:15 PM
Present: Mike Carls, President; Joan Ewald, Vice President; Rev. Thor Skeie,
Trustee; Bob Durfee, Trustee, Dr. Carl Bretzke, Chief of Medical
Staff
Absent: Dori Johnson, Secretary (excused); Rolly Balke, Trustee (excused)
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator; Jane Lien, RN -Director
of Nursing Services; Frank Seivert, Director of Finance;
Jane Hodgins, Hutchinson Leader; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording
Secretary
Prior to the meeting, Jane Lien presented a short informational program
on AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome).
She quoted World Health Organization (WHO) statistics saying 40,000 cases
of AIDS in 91 countries have been reported. Within the next five years,
between 500,000-3,000,000 cases of AIDS, and 100,000 deaths, are expected
worldwide. The Center for Disease Control has projected 270,000 cases
will be reported within the next five years and 179,000 deaths will occur
• in the United States alone.
The AIDS syndrome is characterized by a defect in the body's immune -fighting
system, and illnesses then take the opportunity to invade the weakened
immune system. The AIDS virus attacks the body's white blood cells, using
as its "host". AIDS antibodies - substances produced when the virus has
been introduced into the body - will be present when a person has been
exposed to the disease. A blood test is used to determine the presence
of the antibodies and, therefore, indicates whether or not a person has
the disease.
Lien showed a graphic illustration of an iceberg, representing the numbers
of AIDS cases expected. The tip of the iceberg, the only portion showing
"above water", was labeled as the number of cases actually verified to date.
The remainder of the iceberg, which was shown under the water line, signified
the projected number of cases to be reported within the next several years.
Questions that might be asked of board members were next discussed.
Does our hospital accept AIDS patients? Yes, Lien answered, it is hospital
policy to accept those patients and any patients requiring medical treatment.
Would someone, as a patient, be placed in a room with an AIDS patient?
Lien answered no, that AIDS patients would be placed in private rooms
under isolation conditions, to prevent spread of the disease. Would the
AIDS blood tests be confidential? Yes, Lien answered, because only key
laboratory personnel, the physician and the patient would know the results
is
of the blood tests. The results would remain confidential because hospital
personnel, in all instances, would be expected to maintain strict
confidentiality and to give the patient the support necessary to deal
with such an illness.
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Two
•
Lien told the board that guidelines are expected to be forthcoming from
both the State Department of Health and the Center for Disease Control
as more is learned about the disease.
The board thanked Lien for her presentation, and the meeting was called
to order by President Carla at 6:25 PM.
Minutes of Past Meetings. The minutes of the January annual meeting were
presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Ewald, to approve
the minutes of the January 21, 1987, annual meeting of the
Hutchinson Community Hospital board of directors as presented.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
At this point, President Carla requested the board discuss recommendations
of potential candidates for hospital trustee. The process to be followed
included the board making a recommendation to the mayor for replacement
of the out -going trustees. If the mayor approves the recommendations, the
administrator will then approach the individuals named to learn of their
interest in serving on the board. If they accept, the mayor will make
the appointment; if not, alternative candidates will be sought and
approached. •
Durfee suggested someone from Hutchinson Technology, Inc. (HTI) be
recruited for the board in light of that company's growing impact on
the community. The board members agreed, during discussion, that the
replacements should be either one male and one female, or two females,
to keep or improve the balance of gender on the board. Candidates
must also meet the residency requirements of the ordinance stating
no more than two board members may reside outside the city limits.
Another suggestion was heard that a business person or someone who is
responsible for many employees be added to the board.
The board then returned to the agenda items for the meeting.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes. The minutes of the regular and committee
meetings of the Medical Staff for February, 1987, were next presented by
Dr. Bretzke. No unusual comments were made.
•
Z
E
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Three
Old Business
A. Capital Expenditure Budget. A summary of capital budget items versus
items actually purchased during the past nine years was distributed by
Seivert. The board then considered a request from the administrator
for authorization to make capital purchases under $3,000, up to the
amount of $91,000 budgeted for 1987. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Skeie, to annually
review capital purchases of $3,000 or less (at time of
annual budget review) and to establish policy to give the
administrator the authority to spend up the the amount budgeted
for that fiscal year.
Following further discussion:
Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Skeie, to amend the
previous motion to allow the Administrator to spend up to
$100,000 for Fiscal Year 1987 on capital expenditures of
$3,000 or less. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Following further discussion:
• Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Skeie, to approve
addition of the amendment to the first motion and to approve
the first motion, so stated. All were in favor. Motion
carried.
Alternative methods of financing capital expenditures will be discussed
at a future meeting.
B. New Board Members and Board Composition. The board then resumed the
discusion of potential candidates to replace out -going hospital board
trustees. Graves left the meeting, at the request of board members,
to contact the president of HTI to obtain names of potential candidates
who might best represent HTI consumers. Following his return, the
following names were considered by the board:
Beatrice Grayczyk
Scott Schaefer
Rich Meyers
John Inglemann
Julie Inglemann
Jacque Glas
(of Silver Lake)
June Knutson
Dorothy Desens
Walt Clay
Wayne Fortun
Terry Fortun
Roxanne Wigen
The board then considered all potential candidates named during the
meeting and those from past discussions, and made the following motions
of recommendation for the mayor's consideration:
3
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Four
is
(B.) Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Ewald, to recommend
June Knutson to the mayor as a potential candidate for
hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Skeie, to recommend
Rich Meyers to the mayor as a potential candidate for
hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Ewald, to recommend
John Inglemann to the mayor as an alternate candidate for
hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Durfee, to recommend
Jacque Glas to the mayor as an alternate candidate for
hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Ewald, seconded by Skeie, to recommend
Dorothy Desens to the mayor as a second alternate candidate
for hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Durfee Carls
Motion was made by s, seconded by Pnr€ee, to recommend �'�
ms
Walt Clay to the mayor as a second alternate candidate for
hospital board trustee. All were in favor. Motion carried.
These recommendations will be relayed to the mayor by the hospital
administrator, in order of priority as recommended by the board
members.
The board then discussed the format of appointments suggested by the
City's administrative secretary, Marilyn Swanson. This format includes
(a) extension of Durfee's and Skeie's terms because they were
appointed to complete the unexpired terms of former board members,
and (b) making the two new appointments for a four-year term and
a five-year term to insure that no more than one board member
would be leaving the board during any one year. Following
discussion:
Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Bretzke, to
recommend adoption of the above-described format of
hospital board trustee appointments to the mayor.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
This recommendation will be relayed to the mayor by the hospital
administrator.
New Business
A. Medical Staff Appointments. The board members next considered
appointments of a cardiologist and several radiologists to the •
consulting staff of the hospital. Following discussion:
At
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Five
• (A.) Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Ewald, to accept
the recommendations of the Executive Committee of the
Medical Staff and grant Consulting Staff privileges to
the following physicians:
Robert A. Van Tassel, MD, Cardiology
William J. Boardman, MD, Radiology
John F. Cardella, MD, Radiology
Stefan D. Laxdal, MD, Radiology
David L. Moody, MD, Radiology
Joseph M. Meland, MD, Radiology
Arnold 0. Rholl, MD, Radiology
David A. Larson, MD, Radiology
All were in favor. Motion carried.
B. Cardwriter Embosser. The board considered a request from the Business
Office to purchase a DataCard 300 cardwriter embosser in place of the
Addressograph model previously authorized for purchase. While the cost
of the DataCard model would be $2,000 higher than the cost of the
Addressograph, the greater reliability of the machine would
eliminate the need for a maintenance contract (according to
information received from hospitals owning a DataCard system).
• This would mean the cost of the DataCard 300 model at $12,000
would compare favorably to the cost of the Addressograph model
at $10,100 plus the annual $2,300 maintenance agreement cost.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Ewald, seconded by Durfee, to resubmit
a request to the City Council for approval to purchase
the DataCard 300 cardwriter embosser in the amount of
$12,000. All were in favor. Motion carried.
C. Word Processor. Graves informed the board of the hospital's intent
to replace typewriters, as necessary, with word processing equipment
in the future. The administrative secretaries are planning to
use the finance director's IBM-PCXT for word processing, and monies
budgeted for word processing in Administration, then, will be
used to purchase a new computer for the finance director.
Graves also informed the board that a laser printer would be placed
on order for the administrative secretaries' use. Following
discussion:
Motion was made by Durfee, seconded by Ewald, to approve
the purchase of a Compaq computer in the amount of
approximately $5,700 for use by the director of finance.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
• D. Five -Year Development Plan. Graves reviewed a listing of space needs
submitted by various departments of the hopsital. He asked the board
for authorization to hire an architect to draft a five-year
5
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Six
•
(D.) Development plan addressing these space needs. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie to hire an architect to draft a
five-year development plan addressing space need of the
hospital at a cost not to exceed $10,000. Motion failed
for lack of a second.
Following further discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Bretzke, to hire
Horty, Elving 6 Associates to draft a five-year development
plan addressing space needs of the hospital.
Prior to a vote on this motion, President Carla requested that there
there be more than one architectural firm contacted on the development
plan project rather than specify a particular architect in the motion.
The previous motion was then withdrawn. Following further
discussion:
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Ewald, to
authorize the hospital administrator to hire an architect
to draft a five-year development plan consistent with
institutional operational objective fPP1, which addresses
the space needs of the hospital. All were in favor. •
Motion carried.
E. HMO Gold. Graves informed the board that Blue Cross and Blue Shield
of Minnesota has been discussing moving their HMO outstate to compete
with PHP in our area. Graves met with representatives of HMO Gold
to negotiate a fixed -fee -per -stay agreement. Negotiations with
PHP are continuing for the same type of agreement. Any proposal
offering the hospital less than reimbursement for billed charges
will be brought back to the hospital board for consideration.
F. Other. No other items were discussed at this time.
Statistical Report. The percentage of occupancy for January, 1987, was the
same as the previous year at this time. Length of stay increased slightly.
Outpatient services continue to increase.
Accounts Payable. The accounts payable listing for the month of January
was presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Ewald, seconded by Bretzke, to approve for
payment the attached listing of accounts payable and cash
diesbursements in the amount of $634,394.70. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
Financial Staements. The hospital realized a net gain of $63,000 after •
funding price level depreciation and working capital requirements.
E
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - February 17, 1987
Page Seven
Departmental Reports. The Director of Mental Health Unit report was
presented. The board received notification of the Director's resignation
with regret.
Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Patient satisfaction surveys received
since the last board meeting were reviewed by those present. No unusual
comments were made.
Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned by President Carla at 8:21 PM.
Respectfully
submitted,
Laurie Hulkonen Dori Johnson
Recording Secretary Secretary
LH
7
HUTCHM6M•• O • v
BU)GET •OP • • ••S - NAWLTML Y• DQMY M
1• TWO MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1987
CUMM • F• CV
ACMAL BUDGEr VARIANCE 1PATIEV F&MMUE
Daily Hospital Service
$164,253 $130,495 $ 33,758 Medical Nursing Units
67,920 23,071 44,849 Mental Health Unit
433,892 281,573 152,319 Ancillary
$666,065 $435,139 $230,926 Goss Patient Revenue
(27,191) (30,697) 3,506 Less: Discounts & Allowances
638,874 404,442 234,432 Net Patient Revenue
15,557 16,086 (529) Other Operating Revenue
$654,431 $420,528 $233,903 Total Operating Revenue
$264,085 $258,285 $ 5,800
44,769
43,242
1,527
^q,786
18,120
12,666
,793
7,450
3,343
16,702
10,889
5,813
54,792
41,815
12,977
14,443
16,092
(1,649)
5,380
7,065
(1,685)
3,231
3,661
(430)
8,906
8,652
254
2,078
1,789
289
20,847
23,794
(2,947)
12,221
14,358
(2,137)
Salaries
Ewloyee Benefits
Medical & Other Fees
Raw Food
Medical & Other Supplies
Utilities
BmU ing & P�Fni4m ant R*ai rs
Rental Else
Interest
Depreciation
Other Expenses
$489,033
$455,212
$33,821
Total OPerating Expense
165,398
(34,684)
200,082
Operating Inco'e
•
$340,825
$295,298
$ 45,527
117,295
62,848
54,447
878,041
634,151
243,890
21,211
17,659
$1,336,161
$992,297
$343,864
(75,529) (61,394) (14,135)
1,260,632 930,903 329,729
28,282 34,238 (5,956)
$1,288,914 $965,141 $323,773
$536,571
$534,280
$ 2,291
93,073
92,370
703
72,199
39,567
32,Q
21,211
17,659
3,
36,475
23,697
12,778
127,101
97,513
29,588
28,424
35,084
(6,660)
10,329
14,125
(3,796)
7,042
7,221
(179)
17,470
17,304
166
4,613
3,965
648
41,693
48,154
(6,461)
37,866
34,970
2,896
$1,034,067 $965,909 $68,158
254,847 (768) 255,615
Add (Deduct)
Non -{derating Revenue (Mgmse)
Price -Level Depreciation
(26,214) (26,214) --- Arra Working Capital (52,428) (52,428) ---
$139,184 ($60,898) $200,082 Excess Revenues over Expenses $202,419 ($53,196) $255,615
•
a
0
•
0
EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 9, 1986
AFFIDAVIT
I Ie r r`; c <,— Sv o b c) d c�— AM OVER 65 YEARS
OF AGE, OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN:
FAMILY SIZE
2
INCOME
$?,560
$9,180
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $8.60 FOR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE WOULD
IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION
OF THE CHARGE TO $1.50.
SIGNATURE
STREET ADDRESS
FUR OFFICE USE ONLY
To: WATER DEPARTMENT
DATE
DATA CHANGE
To: CITY COUNCIL
ACCOUNT NUMBE
COUNCIL ACTION: AFPROVED
DATE
DISAPPROVED
OF AGE,
EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 91 1986
AFFIDA.VI?
4 /Pl 4 AM OVER 65 YEA
OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THETNANIAL SECURIT
ADMINISTRATION,
AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS
rAMILY S'ZE_
2
ICE WOULD
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $8.60 FOR TRASH ANDREFUSE ASN
REDUCTIO
IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE
OF THE CHARGE TO $1.50.
SIGNATURE I
STREET ADDRESS
FOR 0vGifF S ONLY� F : • -
T0: WATER DEPARTMENT
DATE __--
DATA CHANGE
TO: CITY COUNCIL
ACCOUNT NUMBER
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED
DAT
DISAPPROVED
•
•
�'s
0
March 13, 1987
Hutchinson Recreation Department
Park Board - Lyle Block
900 Harrington
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Sir:
This letter is a request to use Hutchinson Library
Square for a summer band concert series.
The proposed dates will be Thursday evenings.
Dates - June 11, 18, and 25th.
July 9, 16, 23, and 30th.
. August 6 and 13th.
Please note we do not plan on having a concert July 2nd.
The concerts will start approximately 7:00 p.m. and run
for about 1} hours. We would however like to reserve Library
Square from 5:00 p.m. on, in order to give the bands and
musicians ample time in which to set up.
I would appreciate hearing back from you regarding this
matter.
Sincerely,
Carol J. Stark
Summer Band Concert
Chairperson
587-2233 or 587-4327
n
LJ
(612) 587-5151
;varcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
i 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
a � u � w tie. • •i• i
Larry Huhn is attending an 8 -week course in computer-aided
drafting at the Minneapolis School of Drafting on Thursday
evenings, beginning March 5, for the purpose of expanding his
drafting skills with muter technology.
He has requested that the City consider paying for all or part
of the $480 tuition at the completion of this course.
• I believe this course will be helpful to him and that. the city
will benefit from his increased skills. I therefore support
his request for reimbursement.
copy: H. Sitz, Personnel Coordinator
r1
U
4 -�4
• MAR 198)
Ig er
March 9, 1987
Rolling Greens Townhouse Association
964 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland
and City Council Members
City of Hutchinson
37 W. Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, MN 55350
The Rolling Greens Townhouse Association (Bethke units on the
golf course) held their annual meeting Thursday, February 19, 1987.
All twenty (20) units with a combined value of approximately two
million dollars are now sold and occupied creating a substantial
• tax base for the City of Hutchinson.
Our two streets require no city expenditure for maintenance or
snow removal as this expense is paid through the association.
However, the now completed east/west street is extremely dark. We
respectfully request the city council authorize Hutchinson Utilities
to install a street light mid -way in this block eliminating a
dangerous situation.
Thank you for your consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
ROLLING GREENS TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION
4-1_� (�,
Judy Ellis
Secretary
4 -t
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Special Recognition
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
H UTCH I N SON, MINNESOTA 55350
Chief: Orlin "Butch" Henke
DATE: March 14, 1987
Request that the Mayor and Council give special recognition to
firefighters that have recently retired from the Fire Department.
• These men have given a large amount of their time to make Hutch
a safer place to live, shop, and work.
Listed below are the Firefighters I'm requesting special recognition
for.
Dale McLain
22
Years
of
service
Shannon Beem
20
Years
of
Service
Lemoine V Grams
10
Years
of
Service
The fire departments annual banquet is scheduled for Mach 28th
at the Crow River Country Club this is the evening I would like
to have these men recognized for their service to Hutchinson.
RESOLUTION NO. 8470
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
- --- -- -
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET
Replacement Parts 053.501 Toro Mower (Park Yes
Air Tester 490.00 Measurement of Oz Fi I Yes
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM I COST I PURPOSE I DEPT. I BUDGET
Date Approved: March 24, 1987
• Motion made by:
Seconded by:
VENDOR
Distributing Co.
cess Systems Corp
VENDOR
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
IW
(612) 587-5151
f/UTI-I' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Bids were opened at 2:00 p.m. March 17, 1987, for replacement of
our Bobcat Skid Steer Loader. In reviewing the results, it is our
reconrendation to award the bid to KOAIVEhl'S SALES for a new Model
#675 John Deere with a net bid with trade-in of $13,324.55.
Fanm-Rite Equipment's bid on a Bobcat Model 743 did not meet
specifications.
• Generally speaking, we felt the bids came = lower than we had
anticipated.
•
r " d 1,
INDIVIDUAL OR CCMPANY
BRAND
1987 NEW
SKID STEER LOADER
BID WITH
TRADE-IN
CASH PURCHASE BID
CN USED BOBCAT
L & P Supply Co.
John Deere
Model 675
17,952.25
15,259.00
-0-
Lano Equipment Co.
Bobcat
Model 843
17,650.00
14,500.00
-0-
Long Lake Ford
New Holland
Model L555
16,093.00
14.593.00
-0-
Farm -Rite Equipment
Bobcat
Model 743
-0-
12,672.00
-0-
Faun -Rite Equipnent
Bobcat
Model 843
-0-
16,064.00
-0-
Kortvem's Sales
John Deere
Model 675
15,824.55
13,324.55
2,500.00
Litchfield I-Tlenexit
John Deere
Model 675
23,958.00
13,449.00
-0-
Carlson Tractor
New Holland
Model L555
16,400.00
15,200.00
-0-
Prieve Landscaping
-0-
-0-
-0-
1,550.00
Steven Perschau
-0-
-0-
-0-
1,239.00
Don Alsleben
-0-
-0-
-0-
2,001.00
FWm
9
(612) 587-5151
HUTCHCITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 19, 1987
TO: Mayor & CityCouncil
-----------------------------
FROM: Ralph Neumann and Doug Meier
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Awarding of Police Squad Car Bid
— --------------------- — — — — — — — —
Bids were opened at 2:00 P.M. March 17, 1987 for replacement of two squad cars
• for the Police Department.
An "Invitation for Bids" was supplied to Wigen Chevrolet, Plowman's Inc.,
and Swanke Motors. Plowman's Inc. was the only dealer submitting a bid.
Two 1987 Crown Victories
Total Price Bid $26,264.00
Trade -In Bid
Vehicle #1 - 1985 Victoria 2,600.00
Trade -In Bid
Vehicle 012 - 1985 Victoria 2,600.00
Trade -In Bid
Vehicle 113 - 1982 Malibu 650.00
After reviewing the bids, it is our recommendation to accept Plowman's bid
and trade in the two 1985 Crown Victorias for a net price to the City of
Hutchinson of $21,064.00. The new vehicles will be painted a new color com-
bination as recommended by Council discussion.
The 1982 Malibu was a former squad car inherited by the Engineering Department
and used by City staff for out -of -tow n travel. It is not a heavily used ve-
hicle and the $650.00 offer makes it an inexpensive vehicle to hang onto for
• another year. This can be reviewed next year when the Police Sergeant's squad
car is up for replacement.
•
REQUEST FOR CONFIRMATION OF RIGHT TO HAUL AND
DISPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER MATERIALS
TO: Honorable City Council
City of Hutchinson
The undersigned, Galen Witte, requests confirmation from the City Council
of the City of Hutchinson of his right to haul rocks, sod, dirt, and/or
construction materials in the City of Hutchinson and to dispose of same. This
request is made on the basis that such items are not "garbage" or "refuse" as
defined in Section 225 of the Hutchinson City Code. Furthermore, the existing
contract with Junker Sanitary Service, Inc., provides that Junker Sanitary
Service, Inc., will not be required to haul rocks, sod, dirt, or construction
materials from contractors.
The undersigned owns and operates a covered, mechanized, packer type refuse
truck to be used where required and the other necessary trucks and equipment to
haul such rocks, sod, dirt, or construction materials. The undersigned also
carries liability insurance to protect the public.
It, therefore, is requested that the right of the undersigned to haul
rocks, sod, dirt, and construction materials be confirmed by the City Council
endorsing the acknowledgment on the copy of this request and returning it to
the undersigned.
• Dated this day of March, 1987.
Galen Witte Gt/A
The right of Galen Witte to haul rocks, sod, dirt, and construction materials
as recited in the foregoing request without a permit under Section 225 of the
Hutchinson City Code is hereby acknowledged.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By
aye or
m
0
•DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL B. LEBANON
GARY D. MCDOWELL
FAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON
DANIEL J. BERENS
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K. FRETLAND
CHARLES L. NAIL. JR.
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
•
March 18, 1987
AiiNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT I.Aw
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(012)587-7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Garbage and Refuse Hauling Contract
Our File No. 3188-87-0001
Dear Mr. Plotz:
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55418
(012)545-8000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(e 12) 388- 2214
714 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336
(612) 664-0111
MAR 1987
REMVED
Z
I have at your request reviewed the July 1st, 1980 Agreement
between Junker Sanitary Service, Inc. and the City of Hutchinson
with respect to a recent request from Galen Witte to haul dirt,
earth, boulders and apparently used lumber as to whether or not
Mr. Witte's proposed hauling practices violate paragraph 12 of
the aforementioned agreement. I have been independently advised
by council representatives and others that Mr. Witte's proposed
hauling practices are followed by other contractors.
Paragraph 12 of the Agreement between the City and Junker Sanitary
Service, Inc. provides "the party of the first part is hereby
given an exclusive contract to remove commercial garbage and refuse
in the City of Hutchinson. The party of the first part shall assume
the responsibility for billing the individual commercial unit served.
Commercial garbage and refuse accounts may haul their own garbage
and refuse."
The term "commercial" is not defined in the Agreement. It is
interesting to note that the Agreement specifically provides,
in paragraph 4, "It is agreed that the party of the first part will
not be required to haul rocks, sod, dirt or construction materials
from contractors."
. Under these circumstances and based on my review of the Agreement
and the facts as they have been presented to me to date, it is my
opinion the proposed hauling arrangement by Mr. Witte does not
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
March 18, 1987
Page #2
violate the July 1, 1980 Agreement and, in fact, appears to be
specifically excluded from the Agreement.
If you have any questions in connection with this opinion, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNO &/M DOWELL
,� ill
G. Br�y 1 n ersoq
GBA:lm
I-
L-1
0
JW(612) 587-5751
'yL1TZ,y'CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON.4VENUEWEST
TCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 20, 1987
TO: Mayor —and City Council
-----------------------------
FROM: Marilyn Swanson, Administrative Secretary
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Bids for Police Station
------------------------------
• The bids on the police station were opened March 18. However, due to the
volume of bids and breakdown of the project, the consultant did not feel
he could have a recommendation ready by March 24 for the regular Council
meeting.
0
Chairman Dick Burgart felt it would be necessary to hold a special meeting
to review and award the bids. He has suggested a date during the week of
March 30 or the first week in April.
,�iiUjL JY /� d C ! a d' L a` ! .+' `§✓ s er { i.� ed �+� € iii
/ 3i WASN(NG ON AVENUE v ✓EST
NUiCHINSON, MINK 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 24, 1987
TO:Mayor $ City Council
--—————————————————————— — — — — ——
FROM•Water Billing Department
--—————————————————————— — — — — ——
SUBJECT•Delinquent Accounts for the month of March
--—————————————————————— — — — — ——
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water accounts for the month
of March, Recommend water service be discontinued on Monday,
March 30, 1987 at 'boon.
•
91-
r�
u
Randy Mulligan Kenneth Albrecht Kenneth Wornson
595 Franklin St S 732 Grove St S 305 Hassan St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson IIN 55350
595 Franklin St S 732 Grove St S 305 Hassan St S
1-395-0595-023 1-455-0732-031 1-480-0305-091
101.59 13.37 43.04
Promises $20/wk
C W Hanson
Afyon Yickl d
Jerry Carlson
533 Hassan St
S
60 in S
3I5 Washington
Av W
Hutchinson MN
55350
Hutch 'n n MN 55350
Hutchinson MN
55350
533 Hassan St
S
605 M St S
315 Washington
Ave
1-480-0533-031
1-6 -060 91
1-965-0315-011
46.48
16 .02
98.14
•
Mark Brock
Chris Peterson
607 Roberts Rd
S
6 Main St S
Hutchinson MN
55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
607 Roberts Rd
S
550 Harmony Ln
2-830-0607-092
2-465-0550-083
50.00
157.80
cc: Marion Kahl
Bob Wohlford
607 Roberts Rd
S
320 Boulder Cir
Hutchinson MN
55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 4/15
Pi
arw Of
MCLEOD COUNTY ASSESSOR
O. (Tony] Victorian Court House TELEPHONE
�UNTY ASSESSOR 83011th Street East 864.5551
Glencoe, Minnesota 65336
Mahch 6, 1981
Ctak o6 City on Township:
Enctozed is .the nonce o5 .time set bon the meeting o6 youA
Local Boated o6 Review and atso the nece6sany assessment notice btank.6
which must be posted and pub2.i.6hed at .beast 10 days prion to the date
o6 the meeting.
16 this meeting date and time set 6o)L your. 1wtizdicti.on
conjZiets in some way, pteaze tet this o66.iee know at once so that a
new date may be set. This, is dmpontant because att "Notices o6
Assessment and Equd nation" 6onms that Late mailed to the taxpa.yeu
. wilt .inaeude the meeting date and time on them. A nev.iew date change
cannot be made a6te). the notices ante sent out.
VouA cooperation in this matte). wiU be appneedated. Thank
you.
S.ince)Lety,
0.6,.L; -L -/"LL
A. 0. V.ictoti.an
County Assessor
AOV/an>/
Enc;
McLeod County J—'
Equal Opportunity Employer
A.F. 4—No ioe to (]st of Meetm` or ewM Of
OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR
TO THE CLERK OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON
a IRC81 fa* ,nk,IN5 D
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the 19TH day of JUNE
at__111_o'clock_A�.M., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Review—ef4W*;4 W9W
(strike out w)
—in your C I TY for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law.
Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.1, you are required to give notice of said
meeting by publication and posting, not later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting.
Given under my hand thin 6TH day of MARCH 2987
MC L E O D County, Minnesota
•Applies mly to cities whose charter PwAdm for a Board Of EQuaBranoo iosteed of a Brod of Review.
0
(612) 587-5151
f1UTlN'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 18, 1987
T0: Mayor $ City Council
— -------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM• Mr. Dick Nagy, Water Department
SUBJECT: Modification to Aeration Room Ventilation
— ------------------------- — — ——
• Find attached a bid for installation of the additional ventilation
equipment at the water treatment plant needed to lower the carbon
dioxide level in our water.
Of the three contractors provided with plans, Miller, Miller €, Mac
was the only one to submit a quote. The dollar amount is within
the estimated cost from RCM and I recommend approval.
Since
1934
MILLER, MILLER & MAC, INC.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
P. D. Box 248
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA
S S S S 0
March 10, 1987
Richard Nagy
Chief Water Plant Operator
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Richard,
We propose to furnish labor and material to
enlarge opening and install a new louver (model
EL304C 24" x 3211). To cut a hole in roof and
install a new Jenn Air 121SCR blower, to connect
electric as per plans.
Estimated Amount: $2,859.00
Sincerely yours,
Dalton Watson
DW:clt
Tel. 587-3008
•
•
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
•DAVID
B. ARNOLD ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5881 CEDAR LEE ROAD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL 101 PARE PLACE
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55410
MICHAEL B-L.BARON
(812)545-9000
OARY D. MIDOwELL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
PAYE ENOMLES (612)587-7575
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
50 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
G. BARRY ANDERSON RESIDENT ATTORNEY
INCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
DANIEL J. BERENS G. BARRY ANDERSON /q� -�
STEVEN S. HOGE
(B 389.2214
LAURA E. FRETLAND /
714 TENTH STREET EAST
CHARLES
OLENCOIN� 581'A 55338
DAVID ARUEOGEMANN �
(61P2)MINNESOTA
B
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
March 11, 1987 „ib�
f0�' ,1„�v�
189101112j�
PI
K
1114j? 19 s�
^y 8 ~
Mr. Gar Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West �'e►r�
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
1 !zg�SZgZ�22
Re: Wastewater Treatment Plant
1�
Our File No. 3188-87-0004
tM^
•
Dear Gary:
I enclose herewith a Notice of Adverse Claim with
regard to the
Treinen easement. Please have the Mayor execute
this Notice of
Adverse Claim and I believe we have also provided
to you the
original easement executed by Lorraine Treinen.
That document
s ou a execute as we .
Please let me know if you have any pro lems with
any of the fore-
going. MS
Thank you. Best personal regards. Cr
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELLj
'G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
r 1
U
NOTICE OF ADVERSE CLAIM .
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §508.70
1. The adverse claimant, namely, the City of Hutchinson, a
municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
has entered into an easement agreement with Lorraine Treinen,
dated February 19, 1987, a copy of which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and is incorporated herein specifically by reference.
2. The subject land is located in the County of McLeod,
and is described as follows:
Outlot "A" of Hutchinson Industrial District, according to
the recorded plat thereof. Said land being registered land,
Certificate of Title No. 1352, Volume 6, Page 9, Files of
the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County. •
3. Said Certificate of Title shows that the registered
owners of said land are Harlan C. Langholz and Marie Langholz.
4. Said property was sold to the State of Minnesota for
failure to pay taxes, Auditor's Tax Certificate, Document No.
5133, Files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County.
5. The State of Minnesota conveyed its interest in the
above-described land to Wayne Kenning and Willard Exsted.
6. The deed of conveyance from the State of Minnesota to
said parties has never been filed.
7. Said Wayne Kenning and
Willard
Exsted conveyed,
by
quit claim deed, their interest
in the
above-described land
to
said Lorraine Treinen.
8. The deed of conveyance of the above-described land in .
favor of Lorraine Treinen was never filed.
• 9. That on February 19, 1987, the owner; namely, Lorraine
Treinen, executed an easement in favor of the City of Hutchinson,
a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
over a part of the above-described land (See Exhibit A).
10. That the failure of prior record owners to file deeds
of conveyance and to conduct a proceeding subsequent to initial
registration has prevented the adverse claimant herein from
filing its easement (on Certificate of Title No. 1352) in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County.
11. The address (to comply with the "residence" requirement
of Minn. Stat. §580.70) of the adverse claimant is: The City of
Hutchinson, City Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson,
Minnesota, 55350.
• 12. The designated place at which all notices may be served
upon the adverse claimant: The City of Hutchinson, City Hall, 37
Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota, 55350.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
SS.
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Mayor of
the City of Hutchinson; that he has read the foregoing statement
and knows the contents thereof; that the same is true of his own
• knowledge except as to those matters therein stated on informa-
tion and belief and as to such matters he believes them to be
true.
2
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor of the •
City of Hutchinson
Subscribed and sworn to before me
this day of , 1987
Notary Public
Approved for Filing
Date:
Examiner of Titles, McLeod County
2811NOO1.A58
rJ
•
Pi
E A S E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the
day of , 1986, by and between Lorraine Treiinen,
single hereinafter known as grantor and the City of
Hutchinson, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota,
hereinafter known as City:
WITNESSETH:
THAT, for and in consideration of the sum of One
Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuahlp considerati,nns, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
grantor does hereby give and grant in perpetuity to the City
and easement, right-of-way, privilege and authority to
construct, repair, maintain and operate an underground
sanitary sewer/waste water treatment force main and
underground water main on, along, through, across or under the
following described lands lying and being in the County of
McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
That Part of Outlot A in Hutchinson Industrial
• District lying East of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the South Line of Outlot A,
165.0 feet East of the Southwest Corner of Outlot A,
thence North parallel to the West Line of Outlot A to
a point on the Northeasterly Line of Outlot A.
Together with the right of the City, its heirs or
assigns, to construct, repair, maintain and operate said
underground sanitary sewer/waste water treatment force main
and underground water main, adding thereto from time to time,
across, through or under the above-described premises, to cut
and remove from said premises any trees or other obstructions
which may endanger the safety or interfpr- with the use of
said sanitary sewer/waste water treatment force main and
underground water main, and the right of ingress and egress to
and over said above-described premises for the purpose of
repairing, renewing or adding to said sanitary sewer/waste
water treatment force main and underground water main, and for
doing anything necessary, useful or convenient for the use of
the easement herein granted; also the privilege of removing at
any time any or all of said improvements.
It is further agreed as follows:
1) The City agrees that the work of installing and
• maintaining said sanitary sewer/waste water treatment
0
force main and underground water main shall be performed
and completed in a good and workmanlike manner and in
accordance with plans and specifications as prepared by
City.
2) City assumes and agrees to pay for all loss, damage,
injury or death, including costs and expenses incident
thereto, caused to any person including grantor, or to the
property of any person including grantor, by or during the
construction of said sanitary sewer/waste water treatment
force main and underground water main or by the
maintenance and repair thereof, or by its presence or use
of the property of grantor; and. City shall indemnify
grantor against and save him harmless from all liability
for any such loss, damage, injury or death. In case any
suit shall be brought against grantor on account of any
such loss, damage, injury or death, the City agrees at its
own expense to assume the defense thereof and to pay any
and all judgments recovered against grantor, or costs
incurred by him on account of any such suit; provided,
however, that in case any suit be brought against grantor
for any such loss, damage, injury or death, grantor,
providing he has been served with proper summons, shall •
give notice in writing of any such suit and of such
service to the City Clerk of City in order that City may
make a proper defense.
3) The City agrees that it shall be responsible for any
destruction of or damage to crops, trees, shrubbery,
fences, improvements, and the land itself, resulting
directly from the activities authorized under this
easement, either by restoring or repairing such damage or
by making a cash settlement with the grantor, his heirs or
assigns, in lieu thereof.
n) City agrccs that this easement Shall not affect grantor'--
right
rantor'sright of ingress and egress over the property above
described.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and
seals and acknowledge this instrument to be our free and
voluntary act for the uses and purposes herein set forth.
Dated:
Lorraine Treinen
•
9
•
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss
COUNTY OF MC LEOD )
I, Kathleen A. Mikula , a Notary
Public in and for said County and State, do hereby certify
that Lorraine Treinen, single personally known to me to be the
same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing
instrument, and appeared before me this date in person and
acknowledged that they signed, sealed, and delivered said
instrument as their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes herein sit forth.. Given Under m, 'maid and notarial
seal this 19 day of February , 1987.
Kathleen A. Mikula
S E A L Eau Claire County
My commission expires: 6/19/88
ACCEPTANCE
The City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal
corporation does hereby accept the foregoing grant and
easement and the terms and conditions thereof. In witness
whereof the City of Hutchinson has caused this Acceptance to
be executed by its Mayor and City Clerk pursuant to authority
granted by its City Council.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By
Paul Ackland, Its Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF MC LEOD )
I, r a Notary
Public in and for said County and State, do hereby certify
that Paul Ackland and Gary Plotz, personally known to me to be
the same persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing
instrument, and appeared before me this date in person and
ac'knowled od that they ciyneu, scaled, and delivered said
instrument as their free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes herein set forth. Given under my hand and notarial
seal this day of , 1986.
S E A L
0
•
•
March 16, 1987
Mr. Steve Ward
R. J. McGraw Law Firm
Citizens Bank Building
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Schaefer vs. Fay & Burckhardt
Our File No. 3188-87-0006
• Dear Steve:
It is my understanding that your office represents Frank Fay and
Curtis Burckhardt in connection with the above entitled litigation.
Jim Schaefer has presented to me executed Consents to the release
of funds and has asked that the City Council authorize payment of
his invoice in the amount of $1,116 from funds returned to the City
by the State of Minnesota.
I have placed this matter on the City Council agenda for the next
regularly scheduled City Council meeting which will be Tuesday,
March 24, 1987. It is my understanding from reviewing the Consent
that Mr. Fay and Mr. Burckhardt also agree to release the City from
any liability with regard to the withholding or payment of the
$1,116 and that both parties understand that the sum of $1,116 will
be deducted from the $5,000 sent to the City by the appropriate
state agency.
If my understanding is not correct, or if you are not representing
the parties mentioned or if there is some other problems, please
advise. Otherwise, I will suggest to the Council that it is appropriate
to pay Mr. Schaefer's bill from the funds in question.
Incidentally, I have provided Mr. Fay with copies of documents dealing
with expenses he still owes the City of Hutchinson in connection with
• the Parkview Plaza/Hutch Hotel project. I have suggested to him that
it would be appropriate to get some of those expenses paid and perhaps
there would be a way to resolve the dispute. I recognize this is not
a high priority with anyone, but perhaps at your convenience, you
could visit with Mr. Fay and if necessary Mr. Burckhardt and let me
know how they wish to handle this matter.
9-E.
AnwOLD Bc MCDOWELL
•DAVID
B. ARNOLD
ATTORNEYS &T LAW
EIRI CEDAR LEE ROAD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
101 PARE PLACE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
MICHAEL e. L.BARON
(6IR)545.0000
GARY D. MCDOwELL
HVTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
MN TOLL "ME 000-343.4645
PAYE KNOWLES
(612)587-7575
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
O. BARRY ANDERSON
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 551071
DANIEL J. BERENS
O. BARRY "DENSON
(ale)360.1s14
STEVEN S. HOOF
LAURA R. FRETLND
714 TENTH STREET EAST
CHARLES L NAIL, JR.
OLENCOE, MINNESOTA 56306
DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN
(RIs) 564.6111
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
March 16, 1987
Mr. Steve Ward
R. J. McGraw Law Firm
Citizens Bank Building
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Schaefer vs. Fay & Burckhardt
Our File No. 3188-87-0006
• Dear Steve:
It is my understanding that your office represents Frank Fay and
Curtis Burckhardt in connection with the above entitled litigation.
Jim Schaefer has presented to me executed Consents to the release
of funds and has asked that the City Council authorize payment of
his invoice in the amount of $1,116 from funds returned to the City
by the State of Minnesota.
I have placed this matter on the City Council agenda for the next
regularly scheduled City Council meeting which will be Tuesday,
March 24, 1987. It is my understanding from reviewing the Consent
that Mr. Fay and Mr. Burckhardt also agree to release the City from
any liability with regard to the withholding or payment of the
$1,116 and that both parties understand that the sum of $1,116 will
be deducted from the $5,000 sent to the City by the appropriate
state agency.
If my understanding is not correct, or if you are not representing
the parties mentioned or if there is some other problems, please
advise. Otherwise, I will suggest to the Council that it is appropriate
to pay Mr. Schaefer's bill from the funds in question.
Incidentally, I have provided Mr. Fay with copies of documents dealing
with expenses he still owes the City of Hutchinson in connection with
• the Parkview Plaza/Hutch Hotel project. I have suggested to him that
it would be appropriate to get some of those expenses paid and perhaps
there would be a way to resolve the dispute. I recognize this is not
a high priority with anyone, but perhaps at your convenience, you
could visit with Mr. Fay and if necessary Mr. Burckhardt and let me
know how they wish to handle this matter.
9-E.
Mr. Steve and
March 16, 1987
Page #2
Thank you- Best personal regards'
Very truly yours.
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lmB• Schaefer
CC James
Gary Plotz
0
•
0
CONSENT TO RELEASE OF FUNDS
0
I, Curtis E. Burckhardt, hereby consent to the payment of One
Thousand One Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($1,116.00) by the City
of Hutchinson, Minnesota to James H. Schaefer for his services
in connection with the hotel project within Development District
Number 4.
This Consent is given in full settlement of James H. Schaefer's
claim in the case entitled James H. Schaefer, Plaintiff vs.
Frank J. Fay and Curtis E. Burckhardt, d/b/a Parkview Plaza
Limited Partnership, Frank J. Fay and Curtis E. Burckhardt,
General Partners, Defendants. This Consent shall not be deemed
• to be an admission of the allegations set forth in the Complaint.
This release is given upon the condition that James H. Schaefer
upon receipt of the sum of One Thousand One Hundred Sixteen
Dollars ($1,116.00) shall dismiss the aforementioned action
with predjudice and without cost to either party.
Dated this day of March, 1987.
C�Irfls E. BurckIar4t
•
.e : ,. . A I
It Frank J. Fay, hereby consent to the payment of one Thousand One Hundred
Sixteen Dollars ($1,116.00) by the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota to James
H. Schaefer for his services in connection with the hotel project within
Development District Number 4.
This Consent is given in full settlement of James H. Schaefer's claim in
the case entitled James H. Schaefer, Plaintiff vs. Frank J. Fay and Curtis
E. Burckhardt, d/b/a Parkview Plaza Limited Partnership, Prank J. Fay and
Curtis H. Burckhardt, General Partners, Defendants. This Consent, shall not
be deemed to be an admission of the allegations set forth in the Complaint.
This release is given upon the condition that James H. Schaefer upon
receipt of the sum of One Thousand One Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($1,116.00)
shall dismiss the aforementioned action with prejudice and without cost to
either party.
Dated this day of , 1987.
Frank T. Fay
0
•
Attorneys at Law
JAMES S. HOLMES
DAVID L. GRAVEN
JR.
NFEFNVIE N
DANIEL R. )
BARBARA L.
/T
FbR YOUR 1NFOR%JAT1ON
HOLMES & GRAVEN,
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 ROBERT J. DEIKE
MARK A. LINDGREN
(612) 337-9300 LAURA K. MOLLET
BRUCE A. KOHN
Rap Sax (612) 337-9310 STEWART D. GREGG
CHRISTINE M. CHALE
Telecopier(612) 337-9311 MARY G. DOBBINS
V MARY J. BRENDE.N
STEVEN T. HETLAND
PATRICIA A. BLOODOOOD
2200 Nonhwesrern Financial Center, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 ��! TIMOTHY E. MARX
ERIC A. SHORT
(612) 893-9400 JOHN R. GREEN
N \ V
555 Park Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 5510J� \ \\ >
(612) 228-0889 ry J
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL r^ ! C1)
(612)337-9267
March 20, 1987
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W. HU125-1
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Sir or Madame:
There is an outstanding balance of $3,845.74 due on an
invoice dated 11-15-85 re the City of Hutchinson,
F & T Project. We have been attempting to collect this
bill from Frank Fay; however, per the attached
correspondence from Mr. Fay, it appears that the city
of Hutchinson may be holding these funds.
Please advise if you can settle this account. Thank
you for your cooperation.
Sincerely yours,
Stephanie Scheu
Bookkeeper
9�
Frank J. Fay
Realty
FRANK J. FAY REALTY INC. 126 Main South Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Telephone (612) 587.2341
0
March 10, 1987
Credit Protective Service of I. C. System, Inc.
444 East Highway 96
P.O. Box 64378
St. Paul, MN 55164
Re: Holmes & Graven
#0011-H75o4561
Dear Sir:
I received your letter of March 6, 1987, today and really do not understand why
you are billing me for this individually. According to the printout of Holmes
and Graven, the client was City of Hutchinson involving the matter of F & T
Project. At the time at these services were started, January 15, 1985, F & T
Joint Ventures was a partnership of Trucker Properties II, James L. Trucker,
President and myself. After that time, and about March of 1985, my partner
was Curtis E. Burkhardt, as a partner of Parkview Plaza of Hutchinson, Ltd.
Partnership.
The City of.Hutchinson is withholding funds to take care of expenses such as this;
so I, therefore, would recom-rend that you submit this bill to the City of
Hutchinson for collection rather than to me individuaIly.
Please contact me if you have any further questions regarding this matter.
9_r-
March 12, 1987
Holmes & Graven
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
M111I1I1I111111I11II
1. C. SYSTENI, INC.
G NATIONAL INFORMATION CENITE-7i
444 East Highway 96
P.O. Box 64137
St. Paul, Minnesota 5.5164-0137
Phone.: 612/483-8201
WAYS: 800-328-9595
RE: Mr Frank Fay
NO: 0011-H7504561
BALANCE DUE: $3,845.74
- This account is being disputed. ---We will not -contact this debtor
until you provide verification of the indebtedness. Please read
the attached and return this file with a separate explanation and
invoice. Your exact response will be forwarded to the debtor.
Sincerely,
Customer Service
ST15OC:125
0011-9117-2086
Enclosure
ESTABLISHED IN 1938
AGREEMENT
•
THIS AGREEMENT, between the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation and political subdivision
of the State of Minnesota (the City), and F & T Joint Ventures
, a Minnesota Partnership (the Applicant),
provides as follows:
1. Among the matters of mutual inducement which
have resulted in this Agreement are the following:
(a) The City is authorized and empowered by the
provisions of Chapter 474, Minnesota Statutes, as amended
(the Act), to issue revenue bonds to defray, in whole
or in part, the costs of a project as defined in the
Act.
(b) The Applicant has proposed that the City,
pursuant to the Act, issue its revenue bonds to defray,
in whole or in part, the costs to be incurred in connection
with a project under the Act (the Project), and that
the City and Applicant enter into a lease, sale or loan
agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements
of the Act (the Revenue Agreement).
• (c) As required by Section 474.01, Subdivision
7b of the Act, the City, after notice published as required
by that Section, will conduct a public hearing on the
proposal to undertake and finance the Project and issue
�j revenue bonds under the Act in an amount not exceeding
0$x$;46 (the Bonds), to defray in whole or in part,
.�/ydsthe costs of the Project.
�r7rZ 55 (d) The Bonds shall be special obligations of
the City and the principal of and interest on the Bonds
shall be payable solely out of the revenues derived
from amounts payable to the City by the Applicant pursuant
to the provisions of the Revenue Agreement and from
other revenues or property specifically pledged to the
payment thereof.
(e) The Applicant has requested that the City,
subsequent to the scheduled public hearing, adopt a
resolution giving preliminary approval to the Project
and the issuance of the Bonds (the Preliminary Resolution),
in order to constitute "some other official action"
toward the issuance of the Bonds within the meaning
of Treasury Regulations, Section 1.103-8(a)(5)(iii)
promulgated under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended.
•
9 -JE,
2. The Applicant acknowledges and agrees that
if the City adopts the Preliminary Resolution, such Preliminary .
Resolution does not in any manner whatsoever constitute a
contract between the Applicant and the City and obligate
the City in any manner and that the City is under no obligation
to issue the Bonds and reserves the right to decline to issue
the Bonds, without obligation.
3. The Applicant agrees that it will reimburse
the City for all reasonable and necessary direct out-of-pocket
expenses which the City may incur, including the fees and
expenses of the City Attorney and of Dorsey & Whitney of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, bond counsel to the City, arising
from the holding of the public hearing and adoption of the
Preliminary Resolution and from the execution of this Agreement
and the performance by the City of its obligations hereunder
without regard to whether or not the Bonds are issued by
the City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered
into this Agreement this 28 day of August , 1984.
(SEAL)
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
• �Jv.. ` .
[APPLICANT]
F & T JOI T VENTURES
01
FraA Fay
-2-
James Trucker
•
/(612) 587-5151
71U71Hf/3 ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
__ ---- / HTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 19, 1987
T0: Mayor and City Council — —
----------------
FROM: Bruce Ericson, Parks & Recreation Director
— ----------------------- — — — — — —
SUBJECT: Senior Nutrition Program In Senior Center
-- ——
--------------------------
• The Community Action Agency Senior Nutrition Program has submitted its
1987 proposal for leasing the Senior Center to implement the program.
There are no significant changes from the 1986 contract, and I would
recommend approving the lease agreement.
/ms
9-F
LLP.JL
THIS LEASE, Made this
24.h day of November 1986
Cit of Hutchinson
hereinafter referred to as
between
Lessor, and Senior Nutrition Program sponsored by Community Action Agency, a •
Minnesota non-profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as Tenant.
WITNESSETH:
REAL ESTATE
In consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained,
Lessor does hereby demise, lease and let unto Tenant. and Tenant does hereby hire
d in the
and takeeoa om Lessor the premise
Statof Minn sota, described cated and eas follows:County of
McL
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITY AND LOCATION
Hutchinson Senior n r
115 Jefferson Street
Hutchinson, !L< 55350
THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND COVENANTS GOVERNING THIS LEASE AND THE
PARTIES HERETO ARE AS FOLLOWS: •
1. TERM OF LEASE. The term of this lease shall be in effect beginning
Janus. j987 and continuing until either party deems it
fic&tion stated in hlease. in the
lease my to change edci either party upon60days written notice
thereof to the other.
2. EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT. Tenant shall pay to Lessor the annual sum of
$2,4&3 DOLLARS, for costs incurred by the Lessor because
eeof the
enant s use including utilities. Sum payable, p
er paymnts in Thise
eclause shall cnot n behnegotiable e first yatfless than each rannual ter rterm.
frequency.
3. CASUALTY INSURANCE. The Lessor will insure the prer,ises against loss
or damage by fire, casualty and extended coverage risks;and
d Tenart
shall not be liable for injury to the premises by
other
casualty so covered by this type of insurance, no matter how caused,
it being understood that in case of such injury Lessor shall look.
solely to the insurer for reimbursement and not to Tenant.
4. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Lessor shall provide and keep in force during
The term hereof and any renewal terms a public liability policy of
insurance not cancelable without at least ten days' notice to Tenant,
to persoath
ns andeda ages tonant and properssor ty occurrainst ingiin oty r upon the demr injury or esed •
premises.
?-F
devised prerises in a terartablt state of repair' 9 s in( save ,a .t
hereof.
the tire of the commencerent of this lease. durin the term
shallLessor also be t maintenance,he repair.
replacementof the plumbing, (includingseptic tanks and connecting
lessor shall be responsible
lines), electrical and heating systems.
the structural portions of the
for the repair and maintenance of
building and the foundation, exterior walls. floors, sidewalks, roofs
and parking area.
6.
USE OF PREMISES. Tenant may use these premises during the hours of
hot and
5:00 a - 2:0o r for the purpose of providing meals
for the elderly. Lessor consents to protect and
social services
tenants right to possession of such premises pursuant to the
preserve
terms of this lease.
7b.
TELEPHONE . Tenant will maintain telephone service for project use.
S
TENANT Nal MITH LWS. h at he shall
regulations
conformOwith federal, statetandrlocal lawstand
leased in the operation of his business
governing the premises
therein, not requiring structural changes, additions or remodeling,
which latter are the obligations of Lessor.
9.
TRADE FIXTURES. Lessor agrees that all goods, chattels, fixtures,
equipment and personal property belonging to Tenant which are or may
at all times belong to
be put in or upon the demised premises shall
the sole property of Tenant and may at any time and from
and remain
time to time be removed or substituted.
10.
MAINTENANCE. Premises and equipment shall be kept in clean and
for by both
•
orderTy condition satisfactorily by Lessor and Tenant use
parties.
11.
LESSOR'S SPECIAL USE. lessor upon 2 weeks advance notice to Tenant
hours specified
may use the premises leased hereunder during the
for special activities, in which event Tenant may use the
herein
at some other acceptable, comparable period of time for its
premises
purposes or .expense reimbursement shall be pro -rated based on us.
destruction of tenants equipment, fixtures, and
Loss, damage, or
supplies shall be solely and completely replaced by the Lessor when
resulting from such use or letting of usage to other groups.
12.
WAIVER OF CLAIM. Lessor and Tenant hereby mutually waive as against
loss, cost,
each other any claims, actions or causes of action for any
during the term of this lease as a
damage or expense which may arise
of perils covered by the Minnesota State Fire
result of the occurrence
Insurance Policy and extended coverage endorsements. This waiver
shall
applyshall Tcompany an insurance
coveringsu h perils onbehalf ofcLessor or Tenant during the term
hereof.
13. POSSESSION UPON TERMINATION. Upon the termination of the term of this
lease, or upon any earlier termination thereof, Tenant shall peaceably
the of the demised premises to Lessor
and quietly surrender possession
in s ood condition as the now are except for wear l
•
remove emove aly
and casualty. Tenant, on or before said date, shallame
tear
all
property from the leased premises belonging to Tenant, and
property not se removed shall be deemed abandoned by Tenant.
2
14 days notice thereof tc the other.
eement shall be
15. �porSiEt the partieNnYUG sh eretoSUCCESSORS.
theirThis
respective successors, SSigns. and
provisions of Paragraph 12 hereof.
heirs subject, however, to the
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have set their hands this 0
day Of
LESSOR:
TENANT:
Community Action Agency Senior Nutrition
Program, a division thereof.
BY
By
Marilyn D.
11
0
I
I , owner of farm /
and operated by agree that he will be
operating my farm for the 1987 crop year. By signing this statement,
I agree that advance payments for the 1987 crop year will be advanced
to him and that he will be receiving all benefits from the program.
I am aware that when advance payments are paid on my farm for
1987, that if for some reason he is unable to operate it, these
payments cannot be issued to another operator unless they are
refunded by the operator named above.
ate
•
•
Signature
I`XEMNITY AGREEMENT
Date Aug.._ 13,_1985
This will serve as our agreeinent that Chris Kadelbach will
utilize for far-ing purposes the property known as the Kadelbach
property and Boldt property now owned by The City of Hutchinscn
for a proposed Waste Water Treatment Plant.
For the consideration of free land use, Mr. Kadelbach will
by chemical spray,disc or plow keep noxious weeds to a minir.._a.
The City of Hutchinson can not guarantee that certain portions
of this property will be able to be farmed, however, The Cit•: of
Hutchinson will endeavor to advise Mr. Kadelbach at it's earliest
mcment of pending sale, lease or construction. Under no circ+_ --
stances will The City of Hutchinson be liable for any fertilizer,
seed, crop loss or labor costs arising out of, relating to or in •
connection with The City of Hutchinson acts, whether negligt=t
or otherwise relating to the above described use, in whole or in
part.
It is further agreed that this farm land will be plowed under
in the fall of the year after crops are removed.
This agreement will be for a one year period and reviewed
yearly thereafter. Weed control will begin as of this date .-ith
the first year agreement ending in the fall of 1986.
City of Hutchinson Chris Kadelbac
(612) 587-5151
Hvrcy'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
000# HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 11, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Parking Lot Light
Big Bear Site
The removal was required due to the entrance changes. It eliminated one
entrance and in so doing, moved farther from California Street. The
changes were made in the interest of safety.
• The change was approved by all parties, that being the State, City and two
property owners. The State cannot pay for it, due to the fact, it was on
private property and outside the construction project. The property owner
has not benefited by the removal.
Based on the above, I recommend the City consider payment of the $224.94
invoice.
Attached, for your information, is the last letter received from Greg
Johnson.
MVP/PV
attachment
n
U
�W
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
0 (612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
- WASWNG TON AVENUE WEST
LuTCHWSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE:
March
18,
1987
TO:
Mayor
and
City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Parking Lot Light
Big Bear Site
Since my memo of March 11th on the billing for the above -referenced light,
the City has had a watermain break in the area of Big Bear. The excavation
for the repair was in the area of the former Big Bear entrance. Our repair
costs will be at least $300.00 less, due to the fact that we will not have
to repair the entrance. I submit this information, as another reason to
consider payment of the light removal invoice. 40
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
0
s
Biz Bear Farm Stores, inc: bl-': -
iN SNi A� Nodi
Box 1317
St. C104M. WRONG" li.Ml
i11 -2s1 -MM
february 0; 1957 r
Marlow Priebe
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. y e
Hutchinson, M 55330 xE
RE: Your Letter Hated irebrllary tt2 1957"� k
Dear Mr it lobe -X
Regarding remora�f the 1i't pole` y
struction, you sbould Already knor tbat t1le Vole
almost in the center `v` be proposed driand "i6Aiiy
needed to be mored tom a driveway in'91~ia. Loa
ledged that at our meeting in Hutchinson U the City All
upstairs meeting roam. Secondly, Mr. Guieelado Garai,
MN DOT project engineer out of the Willmar office specifi-
cally instructed our store manager, during�tbe creek of
September 22, 1986, to get Vie pole mored so that eonStr*c-
tion could proceed.'
It is imperative that someone accept the responsollity
for this action and that the contractor, Quade Electric, be
paid for their work. Please expedite this matter and advise
me of the disposition.
An'cerely,
Greg Johnson
Exec. Vice President
GJ/cas
cc: Quade Electric
MN DOT Willmar
Big Bear/Hutchinson
9-N•
Y j
DUADE ELECTRIC
35 -4th Ave. HE
HUICHI1430N. MN. 5515u
I ;c. _ ac
ACCOUNT NU1186
I 11415
SOLD
TO: Sia PEa.1
Hw%. 7 we=_'.
Hutchinson. MN 55Z5(1 t
AMOUNT
To NIAFA! popw - Ml ~
wtwn ■4 Pabm M Ow
AIAIAFIMlM VOMF your PW AML
Normal terms: Net 30 dens
REFERENCE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT BALANCE
9116 11; 3"i 86 s service 225.94
i
•
1
I �
I
i
ALL ACCTS. _ 4 L= ; : FAST DUE �
I �
CODE: 14MME P-0AYMENT F-FMANCE TOTAL
CCAMOUNT WE
MEMO A-DISCOUFR CHARGE i�r.. AMOUWED •..:�. 4ti
D -OR MEMO ALLOWED
"Poo
vc I
Q JADE'S
jectrical
roctors
v
34th Ave- 5 N E
,:HINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
Phone 587.3030
AMOUT
PW }}
MAT�SAL `1!1 Am
TOT% MATERIALS
09116
.os einn+"ocwr�'
EXTRA
-� Cp►fTRACT
DAV WORK _
JACOB r�!
Ae
VoWnpnW OF WOW
6
TOTAL OTHER 9�J�
I Ho. I RATE WNW
TOTAL LABOR ,{
3 `
� TOTAL MATERIALS
TOTAL OTHER ��. I•
i
TAX
}�t a
7pTAL 1
J (b i2) 00 -5151
%f/UTCf7'/' %de Carr f>s'(1?�,�:®rUS0l!
737 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO- Hutchinson City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Planning Commission
SUBJECT: AMMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #464
— --------------------- — — — — — — ——
• Planning Commission recommends approval of the changes
proposed for the Zoning Administration Ordinance, Section
6. (6.01 and 6.02)
6.01 ENFORCEMENT
The Zoning Code'shal1 be administered and enforced by the
En€ereement O€€4eerZonin2 Administrator. The 6ity Goune44 Zoning
Administrator may institute, in the name of the City of Hutchinson,
any appropriate actions or proceedings against a violator as
provided by law.
Any person, firm or corporation, who violates or refuses to comply with
any of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof be subject to a fine of not more
than three hundred de44ars f$390� seven hundred dollars $700) for every
offense or to imprisonment not to excee nine y (90) days. Each day that
a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
6.02 ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
An adm4n4strat4ve staff member des4gnated by the 64ty &aune44
sha44 be the En€ereement O€€4eer and sha44 be respens4b4e for the
• en€ereement of th4s Ord4nanee: The duties of the En€ereement
O€€4eer sha44 be as €e44ews-
The Zoning Code shall be administered and enforced bythe Zoning
Administrator, who shall be thding 0 fid unless the
CitAdmi Council l specifically be re appoints fomeoneTmen T�heZoning
Admimistrator s a e�respon�si6T—e for t� e�orcementof is
Ordinance. he duties o the nindminiTtrator shalTbe as
o�ws� — — — — —
9--z
CITY CF HU7CH1,11S0JV
7 3� w�sr�;ra� T�;v a vEN�F :vrsT
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 5535C
M EM0RAt1 D U M
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO: _ City Council — — — — — — -- — — ——— ————— — — — —
FROM: _ Planning_Eommission — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: _ Comprhensive Plan — — — — — _
--—————— — — — — — —
Planning Commission recommends approval of the Comprehensive
• Plan as explained by Engineer Marlow Priebe with a change
from Commercial to Industrial in the area along Hwy. 7 E.
behind Wigens.
•
%
(cl.2;:i,�i-1i;:-
i
• 1 7 37WA1SHi`ivi
HUTCHiNSON. Mi%N. S5�5
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO: City Council
------------------------- ----
FROM: Planning Commission
------------------------------
SUBJECT: — —Annexation proposed by Frank Fay — — — — _ _ — — — — — —
Planning recommends approval to start annexation procedure
• on property located across from the West Elementary and
Vineyard Methodist Church.
is
ti FEB1987
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION PAI
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA �i��91S751i12�
The undersigned petitioner(s) respectfully represents and states that
he (they) is sole owner of the following described lands:
-e West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (W22 SE"
ZED of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116), Range Thirty
(30) and the West Half of the East Half (Wz E2') of the Southeast Quarter
If the Southeast Quarter (SE4 SEc) of Section Two (2), Township One
:undyed Sixteen (116), Range Thirty (30), excepting therefrom the
following described real estate: The North 700.00 feet of the West 373.37
feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE,' SE4') of Section
Two, Township 116 North, Range 30 West.
and
The East Half of the East Half (E'' ED of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter (SE'y SE'4) of Section Two (2) in Township One Hundred
Sixteen (116) North of Range Thirty (30) West.
And do respectfully request that said lands be annexed to and become
part of and included in the corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson.
Signed:
Frank S. Fay Realty, Inc.
•
•
CI
• RESOLUTION NO. 8469
REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, the following described property is urban in character and
adjoins the City of Hutchinson, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hutchinson hereby requests the
described property to be annexed to the City of Hutchinson, and
WHEREAS, authority to effect such annexation is vested in the Minnesota
Municipal Board,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON:
THAT, the Minnesota Municipal Board is requested to hold hearing and effect
the annexation of the following tract:
The West Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
(Wl/2, SE1/4, SE1/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred
• Sixteeen (116), Range Thirty (30), and the West Half of the East
Half (W1/2, El/2) of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter
(SE1/4, SE1/4) of Section Two (2), Township One Hundred Sixteen
(116), Range Thirty (30), excepting therefrom the following described
real estate: The North 700.00 feet of the West 373.37 feet of the
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4, SE1/4) of Section
Two (2), Township 116 North, Range 30 West.
•
and
The East Half of the East Half (E1/2, E1/2) of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter (SE1/4, SE1/4) of Section Two (2) in Town-
ship One Hundred Sixteen (116) North of Range Thirty (30) West.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of March, 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
S E A L
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 17, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
FOR YOUR INFORMAT1011
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Tom Lyke at 7:30 p.m. with
the following members present: Bruce Drahos, Spencer Beytien, Roland
Ebent, Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young and Chairman Lyke. Absent: Larry
Romo. Also present: City Engineer Marlow Priebe, City Administrator
Gary Plotz and Building Inspector Jim Marka.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, February 17, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF AMMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE 6464 SECTION 6.01 AND
6.02
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:31 p.m. with the reading of
publication 63666 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
• March 5, 1987. The request is for const e� ring n amen ment to
Zoning Ordinance 6464, Section 6 ZONING ADMINISTRATION (Section
6.01 ENFORCEMENT and Section 6.02 ENFORCEMENT OFFICER).
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson,
the hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend approval to the City Council. Seconded by Mrs. Young the
motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Engineer Priebe explained the use of the comprehensive map and
recommended using a color scheme for some buildings. Parks are now
designated by green. He suggested that future parks be shown on the
map and that the park board then be given opportunity to review the
map making changes if necessary.
Engineer Priebe also suggested a review of the Comprehensive Plan
report by a consultant or by staff since the report is 10 years old.
Administrator Plotz agreed that an update should be made.
• Engineer Priebe explained the Industrial/Commercial split in the HTI
area along Hwy 7 E.
1
M114UTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
3/17/87 rhensive Plan to the
40
Mr. Torgerson recommended approval of the Comp
City Council. Seconded by Mrs. Young the motion carried
unanimously. jIM
(b) DISCUSSION OF "SAFE RENTAL PROPERTY" RQTE0imYKMarka as he was
Chairman Lyke introduced Building Inspector, et and information he had
present to explain a renters fact she
compiled. Mr. Marka explained that he was seeking input from the
Disc
ssion
d with
Planning Commission on the handout. I&ionumembers. Mr. eTorgerson
favorable comment by Planning
suggested meeting with realtors to review the letter with staff,
upon agreement the letter could be handed out with final draft copy
going to the commission•
(c) DISCUSSION OF SATELLITE "DISH" ANTENNAS
Mr. Beytien brought up the fact that ish"t year thantennase commission
Administrator
working on an ordinance regarding
Plotz will contact the
citive sthof Mankato e subject and Owatonna asking for
information they m
5. NEW BUSINESS
ITTED BY FRANK FAY
(a) DISCUSSION OF ANNEXATION SUBMproposal for 34 acres
Mr. Fay made a presentation of the annexation
school and the Methodist He ualso reported
west of the new elementary for flexabilitY• property and what
explained the need for R-3 zoning rice of pro P
that there would be some control of the p
goes into the lot. proceed
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend Orahos the motion
that council
with the annexation procedures. Seconded by Mr.
carried unanimously. take
Discussion followed on the zoning of the benrezoned R-3ion c district.
a public hearing to request the property
6, ADJOU_ RANT
Te meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p•m•
There being no futher business th
•
VA
CITY OF HUTCh4INSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
NUTCHINSOk MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 23, 1987
TO: _ —Hutchinson City Council — — _ _ _ _ _
FROM: Bonnie Baumetz z License SecretarrL — _ _ _ _ _ — — — — _
SUBJECT: Liquor License Renewals
------------------------------
• Liquor License applications have been approved by
Chief O'Borsky for the following establishments:
O'Toole's
Peter's on the Park
The Victorian Inn
The Sheep Shedde
Gold Coin
Spankys/D'Vinci's
W37
(612)587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
TCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CTPY COUNCIL
FRCM: HAZEL SITZ, PERSONNEL COOR1)nW! )R
Department heads have made recommendations for merit adjustments for
the first three months of 1987, as listed below.
ACMINISPRATI(N by Gary Plotz
Ann Schumann, Motor Vehicle Clerk (P.T.)
Marlow Priebe, Director of Engineering
George Field, Fire Marshal
FINANCE by Ken Merrill
• Diane Olson
Joleen Ru nke
.II7PaWK E by Ralph Nounann
Dick Ebert, Water Technician
Floyd Groehler, Cemetery Supervisor
Doug Meier, Motor Pool Supervisor
POLICE by Dean O'Borsky
Peter Flucke, Parking Enforcement (P.T.)
Rai Kirchoff, Sergeant
iaM ��• • :, .,
Barb Haugen, Senior Coordinator
Tracy Meisner
MINISTRATION by Gary Plotz
Bonnie Baumetz, Planning Ccnmission Secretary
• (NOTE: Gary Plotz' review date is Feb. 1 -
for Commcil consideration.)
3%
28 (see memo)
2% (see maw)
100/hr
10C/hr
2%
28
4%
28
18
48
4%
Special recommendation
for ornpletion of probation
(see memo)
x'-91
(612) 587-5151
H�ry' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
■ r �• a •• i ■
The following performance reviews were accomplished and camments are
provided:
Marlow has not received a merit increase in many years. Marlow has
been very cooperative with me since our last perfQzmance review, and
especially the last six months. Therefore, I can see a 28 merit.
. It would not be a significant amount of money; however, this cooperation
plus future offer of being available and helpful in upcoming months
causes me to conclude it is a "reasonable" reomm a ndation of mime.
I have found George Field very cooperative to work with over the
past twelve months, and to my knowledge he has handled his public
relations well. He has strived to improve his speaking and has
been in Toastmasters to improve further. He has also expanded
cammmmity training in fire safety and has taught at State Fire School.
The fire marshal position was re-classified, and now George Field
is 2.5% below the midpoint. He is a 9 year employee. Assuming
the posi T ison classified correctly, and finding his performance
over the last 12 months very cooperative, I would recan■end 2%.
He will still be slightly below midpoint in his range if this
increase is granted.
/hs
r
(612) 587-5151
/TY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 19, 1987
MEMORANDUM
Somme Baumetz has been an emmplcyee of the city for 5h years.
She has been a transit dispatcher, city hall receptionist, and now
planning cminission secretary, respectively.
W -en we selected Bonnie for the planning ommission secretary job,
we started her at the very lowest step in her grade (858 level)
because of additional train, needed.
Now that her probationary period has expired, it is appropriate to •
review her job.
Since being the planning commission secretary, she has r idl
caught on to all aspects of the job. She has excelled at rnI g
the camputer, asking gaestions, and following things up. She is
also doing a fine job with the charter cammission.
She has both a professional and friendly approach; very imPortantly
stays neutral on all city issues, and provides the confidentiality
and loyalty throughout her work activities and assignments.
In view of all the above reasons, I recamnend she move from Level
1 to level 3, Grade VI.
um
(612) 587.5151
ff
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHlNSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Section Breakdown
The necessary section breakdown needed for our mapping and planning has been
completed, except for Section 30-Tll7N-R29N. This section was overlooked
when we prepared our cost estimate for the 1987 Budget. The cost for doing
the work is $450.00, as shown on the attached proposal.
• I recommend you consider approval of same.
MVP/pv
attachment
17J
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
9�
(1O Mr. Marlow Priebe
City Hall
FHutchinson, MN 55350
FROM
Pellinen Land Surveying
P.O. Box 35
Hutchinson, MN 55350
SUBJECT Section Breakdown Sec. 30, T 117, R 29 DATE 3 13 7
MlSUAGE
Our cost for Section Breakdown Sec. 309 T 117, R 29 would be $450
For an additional $450 we could also do Sections 29 and 28.
k
11
WHED
SEND PARTS 1 AND ] WITH CARBON WTACT. -PART S WLL K RETUW 1D WITH REPLY.
Redlpme 4S 472
Poly Pak (50.eh) 4P472
J
9 -AJ
i
1
SEND PARTS 1 AND ] WITH CARBON WTACT. -PART S WLL K RETUW 1D WITH REPLY.
Redlpme 4S 472
Poly Pak (50.eh) 4P472
J
9 -AJ
(612) 587-5151
W
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CH/NSON. MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 18, 1987
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Hercules Incorporated
Pure Culture Products Division
Hutchinson, Minnesota
on Wednesday, March 11, 1987, Randy DeVries, Ed Nevers of Donohue, and
myself, representing the City, met with Julius Rainwater and Marvin Livesay
of Hercules Incorporated, relative to the issues in the attached letter from
Julius, dated March 18th. Mr. Nevers expects to have a written response to
• this and may attend the Council Meeting.
MVP/pv
attachment
cc: Randy DeVries
L
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
9�
c
March 18, 1987
Mr. Marlow Priebe
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE:
Dear Sir:
a
Hercules Incorporated
Pure Culture Products Div.
35 Adams Street North
P. O. Box 100
Hutchinson, MN 55350 ,
(812) 587-2481
We request the Hutchinson City Council approve the use of part of the
excess capacity which has been provided for future expansion and is
available in the new waste treatment plant on a temporary basis be-
ginning when the new plant is commissioned and ending June 30, 1990.
This request is necessary at this time because planned waste treatment
facilities for the Hercules plant should be delayed due to changes in
production. Such delay will allow Hercules to improve the design o�
future onsite pretreatment facilities.
We agree that the new characteristic values, BOD, TSS, TKN, and 0/G be
reviewed annually by the city and Hercules for adjustments as necessary.
(Appendix I)
It is our understanding that the charges will be calculated as per
Category B Sewer Service Charge Schedule (Table 4-1) in the "Sewer
Service Charge System for Wastewater Treatment Facilities, City of
Hutchinson", dated January, 1986. We would also need a minimum of 12 -
months prior notice from the City of Hutchinson for cancellation of the
proposed allocations.
We appreciate your cooperation and assistance in this matter. If you
have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
^ y
Irm
Ju ius L. Rainwater
Plant Manager
JLR/jab
Enclosure •
CC: Ed Nevers, Donahue & Associates
M. W. Livesay, Hercules Plaza
D. Keilman, Hercules Plaza
J. Gebhards, Middletown
• APPENDIX I •
HERCULES INCORPORATED
Hutchinson, MN
CHARACTERISTIC
Flow
Biological Oxygen Demand, BOD
Total Suspended Solids, TSS
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN
Oil and Grease, O/G
PH Range
•
Probable Maximum (24 hours)
FROM
Daily
Average (30
days)
UNIT
FROM
TO
CHANGE
mgd
0.095
0.064
-0.031
lb/d
330
502
172
(mg/1)
(417)
(940)
(523)
lb/d
57
201
144
(mg/1)
(72)
(376)
(304)
lb/d
45
68
23
(mg/1)
(57)
(128)
(71)
lb/d
45
C5
0
(mg/1)
(4-6.3)
(4-9.3)
std
6-9
6-9
0
•
Probable Maximum (24 hours)
FROM
TO
CHANGE
0.100
0.070
-0.030
350
604
254
(420)
(1034)
(614)
60
239
179
(72)
(410)
(338)
50
82
32
(60)
(140)
(80)
<5
45
0
(46.0) (<8.5)
6-9 6-9 0
March 19, 1987
Mayor Paul Ackland
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue, West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Hercules Request for Additional Wastewater
Treatment Capacity Allocation
Dear Mayor Ackland:
I have received and reviewed Hercules' letter dated March 18,
1987, which requests temporary allocation of additional waste-
water treatment capacity to Hercules through June 30, 1990. The
new wastewater treatment facilities can accommodate these addi-
tional loadings. Treatment capacity which is planned for future
growth but not used at startup would be utilized. The City would
receive additional revenues in accordance with the sewer service
charge system for the additional waste loadings.
Donohue would recommend the City agree to accept these additional
loadings from Hercules on a temporary basis. I have enclosed an
agreement letter which you may choose to sign and send to
Hercules.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Edward S. Nevers, P.E.
ESN/lmg
Enclosure
TR/L/OV8
•
•
Donohue & Associates. Inc.
4738 North 40th Street
Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53083
Engineers & Architects /Y-
414-458-8711 (J
(612) 587-5151
f/�/�// CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 24, 1987
Hercules, Inc.
Pure Culture Products Division
35 Adams Street North
P.O. Box 100
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Mr. Julius L. Rainwater
Dear Mr. Rainwater:
we are in receipt of your letter dated March 18, 1987, which
requests the use of extra municipal wastewater treatment capacity
by Hercules, Inc. We have reviewed your request and determined
that we can accommodate the wastewater loadings defined by Appen-
dix I of your letter from the time the new plant is started until
June 30, 1990. Charges will be calculated as per the Hutchinson
• Sewer Service Charge System for Category B users. Table 4-1 of
the Sewer Service Charge System is an estimated rate schedule
which can be used for planning purposes. This schedule will be
updated as actual construction and operational costs are
available.
The City of Hutchinson agrees to review the revised loading rates
with Hercules for necessary adjustments on an annual basis.
Thank you for your responsible approach to this matter.
Sincerely,
Paul Ackland
Mayor
Gary Plotz
City Administrator
cc: Randy DeVries
Gary Plotz
• Ed Nevers
TR/L/OV5
(612) 587-5151
JWHU,7
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
TCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: 1987 Improvement Projects
The Plans and Specifications have been completed for Projects 87-13, 87-14,
87-15, 87-16, 87-20, 87-23 and 87-32. I recommend approval of the plans
and set a bid date for April 22, 1987.
MVP/PV
•
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
q—
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Resolution No. 8471
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution phased by the council on October 14th, •
19869 the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
following improvements:
Project 87-13 - Service Road East Side of T.A. 15 from Century Avenue to
North Line of First State Federal Site by construction of
Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project 87-14 - From First Avenue S.S. and Erie Street to Washington
Avenue East of Monroe Street by construction of Sanitary
Sewer Trunk Line and Appurtenances;
Project 87-15 - From Fifth Avenue 6 Bluff Street to Fifth Avenue 8 Clark
Street to Sixth Avenue 8 Clark Street to Sixth Avenue 6
Prospect Street by construction of Sanitary Sewer and
Appurtenances;
Project 87-16 - From Old Trunk Seger West of Harmony Lane to Centerline
of Harmony Lane to Old Trunk Sewer North of Harmony Lane
by construction of Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances;
Project 87-20 - West of Wastewater Treatment Plant Site by Grading
Topsoil and Excavating and Stockpiling Granular Material; .
Project 87-23 - Arena Parking Lot by construction of Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project 87-32 - Roberts Road from End of Curb to Roberts Park by
construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances;
and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements
under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be
published for ten day, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that
bids will be opened and considered by the council at 2:00 P.M. on April 22nd,
1987, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's cheek, bid bond or certified check
payable to the City of Huthinson for 10 percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the council this 24th day of March, 1987. •
Clerk Mayor
(612) 587.5151
rr�nry' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
•37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHWSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 18, 1987
TD: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Mater Department
On March 12, 1987, Ken Merrill, Dick Nagy and myself, met with Chuck Barger
of RCM to review the 1987 improvements recommended for the Mater Department.
The major items are a new well and a high service pump, both of which have
been budgeted.
Staff recommends that RCM proceed with plans and specifications to enable
• the City to complete same this year.
A proposal for service is being prepared by Mr. Barger.
MVP/pv
•
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
��r
• March 19, 1987
Mr. Marlow Priebe, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Booster Pump No. 4 and Well No. 7
RCM No. 9717005
Dear Mr. Priebe:
In accordance with our 1986 Water Needs Report and your 1987 budget, the
water supply facilities improvement scheduled for this year should be started
soon. As indicated "the first priority level" includes the installation of the
fourth high service booster pump and the construction of Well No. 7. Space
allocation and inplant piping connections are presently in place to receive
these additions. These units need to be in place and operating to meet next
summer's peak demands.
Hiah Service Booster Pumos
deke The installation of high service booster pump No. 4 includes the installation
earro8muller of a 1,400 gpm short set vertical turbine pump, its associated control check
oc. valves and connecting piping, together with the required extension of the
ociates, inc. 8 8, 8 q
chitects present motor control center and connection to existing control system. Floor
ngineers sleeves, flange connections and cast -in-place conduits are in place for this
land surveyors unit. RCM purposes to provide the engineering services, including
preparation of drawings and specifications, servlces during the bidding phase,
shop drawing review, review of partial payment requests, and periodic
inspection for the installation of high service pump No. 4 for a lump sum fee
of $6,000 plus reimbursable expenses for mileage, printing expense and the
Health Department's review fee. The estimated construction cost for the
installation is $37,800. This fee is based upon using the existing control
system. If additional control work is required, the extra work would be done
on an hourly basis.
Well. Well Pump and Well House
The construction of Well No. 7 includes a new well, a deep set vertical
turbine pump, its associated flow meter, well house and discharge piping,
electrical motor starter, control wiring, and chemical feed equipment. RCM
proposes to provide the engineering services, covering preparation of the
drawings and specifications, bidding services, shop drawing review, partial
payment requests and periodic inspection for a lump sum fee of $18,000 plus
reimbursables as listed above. This fee includes observation of final well test
pumping, and is based upon using the existing control systems. If additional
engineering services are required, we would perform them on an hourly rate
basis.
•
10901 red circle drive
minnetonka. minnesota 55343
box 130
hopkins. minnesota 55343
612-935-6901
y�
• Mr. Marlow Priebe, P.E.
March 19, 1987
Page 2
Reimbursables
In order to provide you with a budget amount, reimbursables will most likely
fall in the range of $500 to $1,000 for the high service booster pump and
$1,000 to $1,500 for the well installation.
Attached is a copy of General Provisions that are part of the agreement for
these two projects.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me.
Obert F. oskop , P.E.
• ACCEPTED:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Im
QI
40
GENERAL PROVISIONS
• Attached to and made a part of LETTER AGREEMENT dated March 19, 1987 between
the City of Hutchinson (OWNER) and Rieke Carroll Muller Associates, Inc.
(ENGINEER) in respect of the Project described therein.
SECTION 1 --BASIC SERVICES OF ENGINEER
I.I. General.
I.I.I. ENGINEER shall perform for OWNER professional engineering services in all
phases of the Project to which this Agreement applies ag hereinafter provided. These
services will include serving as OWNER's professional engineering representative for the
Project, providing professional engineering consultation and advice and furnishing
customary civil, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services and customary
architectural services incidental thereto.
1.2. Study and Report Phase - work completed.
1.3. Preliminary Design Phase - work completed.
1.4. Final Design Phase.
After receipt of acceptance to proceed with the Final Design Phase, ENGINEER shall:
• 1.4.1. Prepare for incorporation in the Contract Documents final drawings to show the
general scope, extent and character of the work to be furnished and performed by
Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Drawings") and Specifications (which will be prepared
in conformance with the sixteen division format of the Construction Specifications
Institute).
1.4.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for OWNER's use
in filing applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of Minnesota Department
of Health.
1.4.3. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project
Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of
the Project or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable
Total Project Costs based on the Drawings and Specifications.
1.4.4. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors
contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where
appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders (all of which shall
be consistent with the forms and pertinent guide sheets prepared by the Engineers' Joint
Contract Documents Committee), and assist in the preparation of other related
documents.
1.4.5. Furnish five copies of the above documents and of the Drawings and
Specifications and present and review them in person with OWNER.
1.5. Bidding or Negotiating Phase.
• After written authorization to proceed with the Bidding or Negotiating Phase,
ENGINEER shall:
1.5.1. Assist OWNER in advertising for and obtaining bids or negotiating proposals for
each separate prime contract for construction, materials, equipment and services; and, •
where applicable, maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding Documents
have been issued, attend pre-bid conferences and receive and process deposits for
Bidding Documents.
1.5.2. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding
Documents.
1.5.3. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of subcontractors,
suppliers and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s)
(herein called "Contractor(s)") for those portions of the work as to which such
acceptability is required by the Bidding Documents.
1.5.4. Consult with OWNER concerning and determine the acceptability of substitute
materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award
of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents.
1.5.5. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in
evaluating bids or proposals and in assembling and awarding contracts for construction,
materials, equipment and services.
1.6 Construction Phase.
During the Construction Phase:
1.6.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with
and advise OWNER and act as OWNER's representative as provided in Articles 1
through 17, inclusive, of the Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract •
No. 1910-8 (1983 edition) of the Engineers' Joint Contract Documeats Committee. The
extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities and authority of ENGINEER as
assigned in said Standard General Conditions shall not be modified. All of OWNER's
instructions to Gontractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority
to act on behalf of OWNER to the extent provided in said Standard General Conditions
except as otherwise provided in writing.
1.6.2 Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of
the work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress:
1.6.2.1. ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the
various stages of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to observe as
an experienced and qualified design professional the progress and quality of the
various aspects of Contractor(s)' work. Based on information obtained during such
visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine in general
if such work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and
ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work.
1.6.2.2. ENGINEER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such observations
of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct or have control over
Contractor(s)' work nor shall ENGINEER have authority over or responsibility for
the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction selected by
Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the work of
Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules,
regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and
performing their work. Accordingly, ENGINEER can neither guarantee the
performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume responsibility •
for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the
Contract Documents.
1.6.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observations,
ENGINEER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s)' work while it is in progress if
ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms
generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design
concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents.
1.6.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary
interpretations and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection
therewith prepare work directive changes and change orders as required.
1.6.5. Shop Drawings. ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate
action in respect of) Shop Drawings (as that term is defined in the aforesaid Standard
General Conditions), samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to submit,
but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with
the information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals, or other
action shall not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of
construction or to safety precautions or procedures of construction or to safety
precautions and programs incident thereto.
1.6.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of
substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s), but subject to the
provision of the second subparagraph 2.1.2.
1.6.7. Inspections and Tests. ENGINEER shall.' have authority, as OWNER's
representative, to require special inspection or testing :of the work, and shall receive and
review all certificates of inspections, testings and approvals required by laws, rules,
regulations, ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine
generally that their content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified
• indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents).
1.6.8. Disputes between OWNER and Contractor. ENGINEER shall act as initial
interpreter of the requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the
acceptability of the work thereunder and make decisions on all claims of OWNER and
Contractor(s) relating to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of the
requirements of the Contract Documents pertaining to the execution and progress of the
work. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or
decisions rendered in good faith.
1.6.9. Applications for Payment. Based on ENGINEER's on-site observations as an
experienced and qualified design professional and on review of applications for payment
and the accompanying data and schedules:
1.6.9.1. ENGINEER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and
recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts. Such
recommendations of payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on
such observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated,
and that, to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, information and belief, the quality
of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract Documents (subject to an
evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial
Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract
Documents and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In the
case of unit price work, ENGINEER's recommendations of payment will include
final determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to any
subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents).
•
1.6.9.2. By recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to
have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations
have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of Contractor(s)'
work as it is furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically
assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement and the Contract Documents.
ENGINEER's review of Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending
payments will not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to supervise, direct or
control such work or for the means, methods, techniques, or procedures of
construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s)
compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders applicable to
their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not impose responsibility on
ENGINEER to make any examina,ion to ascertain how or for what purposes any
Contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price, or to
determine that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to
OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or
that there may not be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that
might affect the amount that should be paid.
1.6.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review
maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of
inspection, tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance
with the Contract Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their
content complies with the requirements of, and in the -case of certificates of inspection,
tests and approvals the results certified indicate :compliance with, the Contract
Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with written comments.
1.6.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is
substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is
acceptable so that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to .
Contractor(s) and may give written notice to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the
work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein expressed), but any such
recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in paragraph
1.6.9.2.
1.6.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts
or omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, of any of the
Contractor(s)' or subcontractor's or supplier's agents or employees or any other persons
(except ENGINEER's own employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or
performing any of the Contractor(s)' work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs
1.6.1 thru 1.6.11, inclusive, shall be construed to release ENGINEER from liability for
failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed by ENGINEER in the
Contract Documents.
SECTION 2 --ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF ENGINEER
2.1. Normal and customary engineering services do not include service in respect of the
following categories of work which are usually referred to as Additional Services.
2.1.1. If OWNER wishes ENGINEER to perform any of the following Additional
Services, OWNER shall so instruct ENGINEER in writing, and ENGINEER shall
perform or obtain from others such services and will be paid therefor as provided in the
Letter Agreement:
•
Preparation of applications and supporting documents for governmental financial
• support of the Project in addition to those required under Basic Services;
preparation or review of environmental studies and related services; and assistance
in obtaining environmental approvals.
Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or
facilities.
Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character
of the Project or major changes in documentation previously accepted by OWNER
where changes are due to causes beyond ENGINEER's control.
J
Providing renderings or models.
Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for work which is not
executed or for out -of -sequence work.
Detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; value
engineering and the preparation of rate schedules, earnings and expense statements,
cash flow and economic evaluations, feasibility studies, appraisals and valuations.
Furnishing the services of independent professional associates or consultants for
other than Basic Services.
Services in connection with field surveys for design purposes and engineering
surveys and staking out the work of Contractor(s).,'
Services during out-of-town travel other than visits to the site.
Preparation of operating and maintenance manuals to supplement Basic Services
under paragraph 1.7.3.
Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness in any litigation, arbitration
or other legal or administrative proceeding except where required as part of Basic
Services.
2.1.2. When required by the Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER's
control, ENGINEER shall perform or obtain from others any of the following
Additional Services as circumstances require during construction and without waiting
for specific instructions from OWNER, and ENGINEER will be paid therefor as
provided in the Letter Agreement:
Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect the
changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic
Services is not commensurate with the additional services rendered.
Services in making revisions to Drawings and Specifications occasioned by the
acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); services after the award of
each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or
excessive number of substitutions proposed by Contractor; and evaluating an
unreasonable or extensive number of claims submitted by Contractor(s) or others in
connection with the work.
Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a
direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages.
Additional or extended services during construction
damage by fire or other causes during construction,
defective or neglected work of any Contractor, (3)
schedule involving services beyond normal working
Contractor.
SECTION 3 --OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
made necessary by (1) work
(2) a significant amount of •
acceleration of the progress
hours, (4) default by any
3.1. OWNER shall provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's
requirements for the Project; designate a person to act with authority on OWNER's
behalf in respect of all aspects of the Project; examine and respond promptly to
ENGINEER's submissions; and give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever
OWNER observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the work.
3.2. OWNER shall also do the following and pay all costs incident thereto:
Furnish to ENGINEER borings, probings and subsurface explorations, hydrographic
surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials and equipment;
appropriate professional interpretations of all _of the foregoing; environmental
assessment and impact statements; property, boundary, easement, right-of-way,
topographic and utility surveys; property descriptions; zoning and deed restrictions;
all of which ENGINEER may rely upon in performing services hereunder.
Guarantee access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public
and private property.
Provide such legal, accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance
counseling services as may be required for the Project, any auditing service required
in respect of Contractor(s)' applications for payment, and any inspection services to
determine if Contractor(s),are performing the work legally.
Provide engineering surveys to establish reference points for construction.
Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction
over the Project.
If more than one prime contractor is to be awarded for construction, designate a
party to have responsibility and authority for coordinating the activities of the
various prime contractors.
3.3. OWNER shall pay all costs incident to obtaining bids or proposals from
Contractor(s).
SECTION 4 --MEANING OF TERMS
4.1. As used herein the term "this Agreement" refers to the Letter Agreement to which
these General Provisions are attached and to these General Provisions, Exhibit A
"Further Description of Basic Engineering Services and Related Matters" and Exhibit B
"Duties, Responsibilities and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project
Representative", as if they were part of one and the same document. •
4.2. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as "Construction
•Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed
and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include ENGINEER's compensation and
expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to, properties
unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER's legal, accounting,
insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in
connection with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to
OWNER pursuant to paragraph 3.2. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising
Total Project Costs which is defined in paragraph 1.2.6.)
4.3. The Salary Costs used as a basis for payment mean salaries and wages (basic and
incentive) paid to all ENGINEER's personnel engaged directly on the Project, including,
but not limited to, engineers, architects, surveyors, designers, draftsmen, specification
writers, estimators, other technical and business personnel; plus the cost of customary
and statutory benefits including, but not limited to, social security contributions,
unemployment, excise and payroll taxes, workers' compensation, health and retirement
benefits, sick leave, vacation and holiday pay and other group benefits.
4.4. Reimbursable Expenses mean the actual expenses incurred by ENGINEER or
ENGINEER's independent professional associates or consultants directly or indirectly in
connection with the Project, such as expenses for: transportation; reproduction of
Drawings, Specifications, Bidding Documents and Health Department review fees.
SECTION 5 --MISCELLANEOUS
• 5.1. Reuse of Documents.
All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared or furnished by
ENGINEER (and ENGINEER's independent professional associates and consultants)
pursuant to this, Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and
ENGINEER shall retain an ownership and property interest therein whether or not the
Project is completed. OWNER may make and retain copies for information and
reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and
others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse
by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse
without written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose
intended will be at OWNER's sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to
ENGINEER, or to ENGINEER's independent professional associates or consultants, and
OWNER shall indemnify and hold harmless ENGINEER and ENGINEER's independent
professional associates and and consultants from all claims, damages, losses and expenses
including attorney's fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such verification or
adaptation will entitle ENGINEER to further compensation at rates to be agreed upon
by OWNER and ENGINEER.
5.2. Opinions of Cost.
Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services
furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER's opinions of probable Total
Project Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of
ENGINEER's experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER's best judgment as
an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction
industry; but ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual
• Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary from opinions of probable cost
prepared by ENGINEER. If prior to the Bidding or Negotiating Phase OWNER wishes
greater assurance as to Total Project or Construction Costs, OWNER shall employ an
independent cost estimator as provided in paragraph 3.2. ENGINEER's services to
modify the Contract Documents to bring the Construction Cost within any limitation •
established by OWNER will be considered Additional Services and paid for as such by
OWNER.
5.3. Other Provisions Concerning Payments.
If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses within
thirty days after receipt of ENGINEER's statement therefor, the amounts due
ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of 1% per month from said thirtieth day, and
in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven days' written notice to OWNER,
si.spend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all
amounts due for services, expenses and charges.
5.4. Termination.
The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be terminated by
either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of substantial failure by the
other party to perform in accordance with,the terms hereof through no fault of the
terminating party. In the event of any termination, ENGINEER will be paid for all
services rendered to the date of termination, all Reimbursable Expenses and termination
expenses.
5.5. Controlling Law.
This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the State of Minnesota.
5.6. Successors and Assigns.
5.6.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors, •
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER (and to
the extent permitted by paragraph 5.6.2. the assigns of OWNER and ENGINEER) are
hereby bound to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party,
in respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
5.6.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under
or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys that may become due or moneys
that are due) this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the
extent that any assignment, subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of
this limitation may be restricted by law. Unless specifically stated to the contrary in
any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the
assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in
this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent professional
associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the
performance of services hereunder.
5.6.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in
this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and
responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive
benefit of OWNER and ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
•
f
P
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING March 24, 1987
. WATER & SEWER FUND
*Withholding Tax Acct.
employer contribution
$438.53
Merle Meece
wasterwater school
4.00
Dizie Petro Chem. Inc.
chemical cylinders
1975.00
Dennis & Suzanne Potter
land purchase
2000.00
Amex Life Assurance Co.
april LTD ins.
49.31
Central Mn. Com. Inc.
repairs
72.99
Fadden Pump Co.
parts
19.66
Hutch Coop
gasoline
85.10
Insurance Planners
insurance
436.00
League of Mn. Cities Ins. Trust
workers comp. ins.
1326.00
League of Mn. Cities Ins. Trust
package insurance etc.
4766.00
Mn. Valley Testing Lab
testing
42.00
Power Process Equipment
parts
374.74
Physicians Health PIan
April med. ins.
998.45
Sorensen Farm Supply
repairs
115.90
Public Employees Retirement
employer contribution
260.66
Sun Life of Canada
April dental ins.
146.61
U.S. Postmaster
post cards
912.58
Zinz Machining
repairs
18.00
Water Products Co.
meter parts
43.23
$ 14,084.76
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*Withholding Tax Account employer contribution $ 77.42
Stearnswood supplies 18.00
Amex Life Assurance Co.. April LTD ins. 6.79
Hutch Coop tire.4 190.95
Physicians Health Plan April med. ins. 157.14
Public Employess Retirement employer contribution 46.01
Sun Life of Canada April dental ins. 22.67
$ 518.98
GENERAL FUND
*Withholding Tax Account
employer contribution
$3129.61
*Midcontinent Theatre Co.
50 tickets
125.00
*Met Center
25 tickets for Ice Show
175.00
*Dept. of Natural Resources
boat registration fees
137.00
Paul Ackland
convention expenses
107.99
Bonnie Baumetz
seminar expenses
27.35
James Marka
2 conferences
30.00
Dorothy Smith
drivers license school
5.14
Jesse O. Bye
winter session lessons
60.00
Ralph Piehl
refund
5.00
Jeffrey Lindwall
court subpoena
10.41
Karen KReger
court subpoena
26.30
• Allied Mechanical Systems
repairs
208.82
Elvin Safety Supply
equipment
208.37
Fitzharris Athletic
football jerseys
180.78
Gopher Stage Lighting
rental
490.00
,'cLeod County
legal services
75.00
Commissioner of Revenue
arena sales tax
227.78
//-9,
-2 -
Met Center
46 tickets
$1196.00
McLeod Co. Fire Chiefs Assn.
2 boxes hazard pads
236.00
Paul Ohlin Sales
batteries
66.32
Potentials Development
subscriptions
64.25
Robinson Appraisal Co.
retainer on appraisals
1000.00
State Document Center
Mn. selected statutes
12.50
Superintendent of Documents
chemical manual
41.00
Victorian Inn
retirement -Marlow Priebe
1068.00
Wilton Corporation
supplies
54.95
Amex Life Assurance Co.
April LTD ins.
598.47
Automatice Supply Co.
supplies
8.13
Arnold & McDowell
legal services
2358.92
Cash Wise
supplies
77.08
Chapin Publishing Co.
publication costs
801.84
Copy Equipment Co.
supplies
212.57
Co. Treasurer
drivers licenses fee for co.
110.00
County Market
supplies
28.48
Condons Supply Co.
supplies
14.26
Douglas Jost
energy program
1274.67
Crow River Glass Co.
repairs
20.27
Eileen Goeders
contract payment
1500.00
More 4 Stores
supplies
4.60
Erickson Oil Products.
supplies
7.59
Great Plains
supplies
94.09
Gopher Sign
signs
87.63
Hager Jewelry
engraving & plaques
18.51
Hutch Coop
gasoline
2003.17
Hutch Drug
supplies
8.48
Hutch Wholesale Supply
supplies & parts
42.40
Hutch Fire & Safety
inspections
110.20
ICMA Retirement corp.
employer contribution
150.14
Insurance Planners
insurance
3514.00
Int'1 Assn. of Chief of Police
dues
20.00
Ideal Shoe Shop
repairs
155.00
Jahnkes Red Owl
supplies
22.81
League of Mn. Cities Ins. Plan
insurance
35,921.50
LEAGUE of Mn. Cities Ins. Plan
insurance
38,456.00
L.N. Sickels Co.
crack filler
220.00
MSF
spring conference
30.00
Miller Miller & Mac
scaffold rental
20.00
Motorola Inc.
equipment
1444.00
Mpls Star & Tribune
eng. ad
94.40
Northwestern Bell
monthly leased phone line
326.50
Homer Pittman
bldg. official conf.
18.57
Peterson Bus Service
passenger coach rental
175.00
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp.
rental
102.00
Physicians Health Plan
April med. ins.
10,298.78
Rite Way Auto Wash
bus & car maintenance
65.00
Rutz P1bg. & Htg.
repairs
20.00
Rockmount Research
supplies
93.65
Schlueters Refrigeration
repairs
28.37
Standard Printing
envelopes
616.75
Public Employees Retirement
employers contribution
3914.64
Sun Life of Canada
April dental ins.
1512.93
U.B.C.
supplies
229.06
Zins Machining
supplies
144.00
Zahl Equipment Co.
repairs
244.68
..est Central Ind. Inc.
supplies
367.80
$ 116,555.51
-3 -
BOND FUNDS
Library Const. Bonds
Silver Burdett Co.
1985 Tax Inc. Debt Service
National City Bank
Police Bldg Const. Funds
Thorbeck & Lambert Inc.
Credit Bureau of Hutchinson
Don Rettmann Construction
LIQUOR STORE FUND
Withholding Tax Account
City of Hutchinson
PERA
Commissioner of Revenue
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Johnson Brothers Wholesale
Quality Wine & Spirits Co.
EdPhillips & Sons
E
educational materials
1986 reporting fees
$228.14
60.27
prof. services 2540.00
demolition of bldg. (Rettmann Const.) 1064.39
demolition & removal of Structures 2019.61
4,666.00
employer contribution $295.23
payroll 4532.07
employer contribution 173.40
Feb. sales tax 6454.89
wine & liquor 3877.33
wine & liquor 2247.33
wine & liquor 2692.73
wine & liquor 4563.58
24,836.56
Minnesota
CG)C
Coalition of Outstate Cities
INFORMATION PACKET FOR ACTIONS
NEEDED BY MARCH 27, 1987
r
CONTENTS
1. Property Tax Relief for Greater Minnesota
This is a summary of why property tax relief and the programs
in H.F. 847 are so important for outstate cities.
2. Sample City Council Resolution
This resolution may be modified to better reflect the views
of your city council or to incorporate examples from your
• community. Send copies of the adopted resolution to your
legislator.
3. Sample Letter to Speaker of the House, Representative Fred
Norton.
This sample letter may be tailored and personalized to in-
clude illustrations from your community. Individualized let-
ters will be more effective. Send copies to your legislator
and to all House Tax Committee members.
4. Names and addresses of House Tax Committee members.
C7:6-33
PROPERTY TAX RELIEF FOR GREATER MINNESOTA
•
House File 847 is a property tax relief proposal that will
provide property tax relief for farmers, small businesses, indus-
tries in distressed areas and for all property taxpayers in cities
with low taxable wealth. The following reasons summarize why prop-
erty tax relief for greater Minnesota must not be ignored in 1987.
1. The Governor's tax and budget proposals would shift
more of the costs for state and local government
to the property tax. These changes will result in
larger than normal increases in local government
levies. The property tax increases hidden in the
Governor's budget proposal range from increased
school district levies required for the receipt of
education aid, to local government levy increases
that would be needed to pay the sales tax on local
government purchases. Some estimates of the impact
of these proposals are local property tax increases
of as much as $200 million or more.
2. Property tax burdens for many taxpayers outside
the metropolitan area are rising dramatically be-
cause of declining local and county tax bases.
Even if local levies remain constant, the rapid
decline in farm land market values will result •
in tax increases of 208 or 308 per year for many
outstate property taxpayers.
3. The combined impact of a declining agricultural
tax base and state budget changes could be disas-
trous for many outstate communities. Property tax
increases of 208 or 308 per year could be devas-
tating for many small businesses and other property
taxpayers that are already struggling for their
economic survival.
It appears that the Governor and the legislature have already
decided that more of the costs of state and local .government will
be shifted to local property taxes. Avoiding an income tax in-
crease may be good for the state and for individuals with high
incomes. However, it is not fair to shift more of the burden
and cost for state and local government to property taxpayers
in communities where incomes and property values are low. The
other tax and spending changes that may be made in 1987 make prop-
erty tax relief and tax base equalization even more important
than in the past.
Prepared by Briggs and Morgan
March 17, 1987
C7:6-24 0
SAMPLE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
• WHEREAS, property taxes for taxpayers in the City of
and other cities in greater Minnesota are rising drama-
tically because of declining local and county tax bases.
WHEREAS, increases in local property tax levies and
local spending have not been a significant cause of the rapid
rise in property tax burdens for taxpayers.
WHEREAS, the governor has proposed and the legislature
is considering major property tax increases.
WHEREAS, the combined impact of a declining tax base
and state budget changes could be disastrous for many outstate
communities because many small businesses and other property tax-
payers are already struggling for their economic survival and
do not have the income or ability to pay these large property
tax increases.
WHEREAS, property tax relief in 1987 is essential for
equity in the state's tax system and for economic recovery in
greater Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the programs contained in House File 847 and
Senate File 878 address these needs by providing property tax
•relief for farmers, small businesses, industries in distressed
regions and for all property taxpayers in cities with low taxable
wealth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of that the City urges the legislature to
pass the property tax relief programs contained in House File
847 and Senate File 878.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the property tax relief
programs contained in House File 847 and Senate File 878 should
be passed even even if funding for these programs must come from
cuts in other state spending, income, sales or other tax
increases, or changes in the homestead credit.
C7:6-31
SAMPLE LETTER
Speaker of the House
Representative Fred Norton
463 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Representative Norton:
I am writing to urge your support for the property tax relief
programs contained in House File 847. These programs address the
needs for property tax relief of farmers, small businesses, indus-
tries and all taxpayers in cities with low tax bases. These needs
must not be ignored in 1987.
Property tax burdens for taxpayers in our city are rising
dramatically because of declining local, school district and
county tax bases. In many cities, the decline in farmland market
values have already resulted in property tax increases of 208 or
30% this year. We anticipate similar increases next year. Making
this worse, the governor has proposed and the legislature is con-
sidering actions that will cause large property tax increases.
Many of our property taxpayers do not have the income or the abil-
ity to pay the huge property tax increases that are occurring
and will continue to occur over the next several years.
0
We understand that property tax relief costs money. However, •
the relief needed in greater Minnesota must not be ignored and
should be a high priority. Equity and fairness in the state's
tax system has been a tradition in Minnesota for many years.
There are many ways that these programs could be funded.
For example, cuts in other state spending programs, income, sales
or other tax increases, or changes in the homestead credit program
could all provide the funding for these essential property tax
relief programs. Avoiding an income tax increase and limiting
the state's cost for property tax relief may be good for the
state. However, it is not fair to shift so much more of the bur-
den and cost for state and local government to property taxpayers
in communities where incomes and property values are low.
Again I urge your support for the programs contained in House
File 847. The relief these programs would provide is of tremendous
importance to the residents and businesses of outstate Minnesota.
Sincerely,
cc: House Tax Committee Members
C7:6-32
•
• HOUSE TAX COMMITTEE
1987
Property Tax Division
Representative Tony Bennett
307 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Kathleen Blatz
259 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Charles Brown
569 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Marvin Dauner
581 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Terry Dempsey
•261 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Don Frerichs
s89 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Joel Jacobs
485 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Bert McKasy
313 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Lona Minne
439 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Ken Nelson
367 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Bob Neuenschwander
337 State Office Building
• St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Tom Osthoff
591 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Elton Redalen
251 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Linda Scheid
583 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Wes Skoglund
409 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Robert Vanasek
459 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
House Tax Committee 1987
Page 2
Tax Laws Division
Representative Joseph Begich
477 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative John Himle
247 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Mike Jaros
559 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Randy Kelly
509 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Dee Long
437 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Marcus Marsh
295 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Peter McLaughlin
577 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Fred Norton
463 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Paul Ogren
449 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Tony Onnen
277 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Sidney Pauly
291 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
p47
Representative Jerome Peterson
597 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Ann Rest
429 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Bill Schreiber
267 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Steve Sviggum
237 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Don Valento
359 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Gordon Voss
443 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Alan Welle
503 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
0
•
•
•
•
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NAME
Louis King
Concession Stand Worker
JOB TITLE
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE March 12, 1987
ADDRESS
116 Monroe, Hutch
I
SUPERVISED BYBcei�O11 et al
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE OTHER:
FULL TIME X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
PAY RATE T 1
COMMEN
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS,
DEPAR T HEAD
�t
PERSONNE OORDINATOR
NAME
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Scott Hanson
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE "larch 18, 1987
ADDRESS
JOB TITLE water/Wastewater Dent. Helper
15 - 4th Ave NE, Hutchinson
0
SUPERVISED BY Randy DeVries, Ralph Neumann
EMPLOYMENT STATUS NEW EMPLOYEE X OTHER:
FULL TIME X PART TIME OR SEASONAL •
returning from seasonal
PAY RATE II- $5employment (1986$5/hr
COMMENTS worked for water/wastewater previously - trained technician
available attain this season.
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
�IQ7S�y o �
Q
DEARTMENZ HEAD,
1
PERSONNEL -COORDINATOR
n
LJ
,NESo,. C9-.223 t
�O 20 ��1lllltE�'S
D�imm(°nl c>f hri�nsExortalion MA
��8rr1987
BOX 768
3 LLLJJ
Fj r�I 2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
TOF TS WILLMAR. MINNESOTA 56201
61 21231-54 66 I6 g 19,
March 11, 1987
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Ms. Marilyn Swanson
Administrative Secretary
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, W 55350
Dear Ms. Swanson:
We have completed a traffic and engineering investigation on T.H. 2217 from the
present 30 mph speed zone near 3rd Avenue N.W. to Shady Ridge Road as requested in
Resolution No. 8431 dated November 25, 1986.
Our study indicates that the present speed limit of 50 mph is still justified. The
physical characteristics have been changed due to the highway construction project
this last year but the speeds sampled have remained virtually unchanged.
Radar checks of speeds were made at four locations in the above mentioned area. The
85th percentile speeds varied from 48 mph to 54 mph except for east bound traffic
sampled 400 ft. from the 30 mph zone in which the 85th percentile speed was 46 mph.
The median speeds ranged from 42 mph to 49 mph.
The 85th percentile is normally the optimum speed limit. The speed check taken after
construction was compared to the speed checks taken before construction and were found
to be the same or two mph higher than before road construction. It is important that
the speed limit reflects the maximum safe speed driven by motorists familiar with the
area under ideal conditions. That speed is generally the 85th percentile.
In light of the data collected along with the physical characteristics of the area
we have determined the present speed limit is appropriate.
We will continue to monitor the area for changes in the future.
Sincerely,
Keith Voss
Assistant District Traffic Engineer
cc: P. Hughes
J. Henslin
R. Kurpius/D. Brannon
An Equal Opportunity Emplover
'?a•
(612) 587-5151
I/ CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
March 20, 1987
Barry Anderson FOR YOUR INFORMATION
City Attorney
101 Main St. So.
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Substandard -Vacant House - Located at 325 Adams Street South
Legal Description: Lot 8, Blk. 36, S 1/2 City Tax No. 23-050-3090
Dear Barry:
The above -referenced property was owned by Kim and Dawn Heyer. County records
now show Federal Mortgage Redemption Assn. as agents. It is further listed to
Duane Kopesky to be sold, if not reclaimed by the owners within six (6) months
from October 30, 1986.
It is my opinion, that the house and storage building on that property, have
• deteriorated or been damaged to a point beyond repair.
The structures are not secured, and are inviting the children in the
community to enter the unsafe structures. Complaints have been received from
residents in that area. I must, also, consider that the buildings are a fire
hazard and a danger to the community.
This is a request to have orders drawn to have the structures removed for
safety purposes.
Copies of previous communications and current pictures are attached.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Respectfully,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
eorge F. ield
Fire Marshal
GFF/pv
enc.
• cc: Butch Henke, Fire Chief
Dean O'Borsky, Police Chief
Homer Pittman, Building Official
Duane Kopesky, County Sheriff
City Council
(412) W4161
D CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MILAN. 55350
March 17, 1986
Eim i Dann Sayer
1315 Jefferson St. So.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
1M: Vacant property at 325 Adams Street
Dear Property Owner:
According to our records, you are the owner of the home at 325 Adams Street
which has been vacant since 8-14-1984.
At this time, the Building Inspections Department would like to inquire as .to
your intentions regarding maintenance of this structure.
0
Please note, that at this time, the structure at 325 Adams Street appears to •
be re -habitable, and is not considered as a public nuisance.
As time lapses, this structure may decay to the point of becoming substandard.
If at this time, coWlaints are filed from neighboring homes, this department
would be required to cite this property as being a public nuisance.
At this point, I feel it would be beneficial to all parties involved that you
contact this office and inform us as to your intentions.
If we may.be of service to you, or if you would like this department to
inspect this structure, we would be happy to oblige.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
CITY of H0ICHIMSOM
sk✓rN.6o ,U ma d
Jaws G. Marks
Building Inspector
JGM/Pv 11a
v.y f' r, ' ,io�Z �o r. �.2 �, •
/01 �� 1 " .
Section 1025 - Nuisances Prohibited
Section 1025:00
• Section 1025:00. Public Nuisance Defined and Forbidden. No person shall commit
or maintain arW public nuisance within the corporate limits of this municipality.
A public nuisance shall be defined as the doing of any act or the maintaining of
any condition which shall endanger the health, peace or safety of the public, or
which shall be offensive to public decency.
Section 1025:05. Endangerj= Health.
Subd. 1. As set forth in the subdivisions which follow, the following are
declared to be nuisances endangering public health.
Subd. 2. The effluence from arW cesspool, septic tank, drain field or sewage
disposal system discharging upon the surface of the ground.
Subd. 3. Accumulation of manure, rubbish, tin cans or other debris.
Subd. 4. The pollution of amy public well or cistern, stream or lake,
canal or body of water by sewage, industrial waste or other substances.
Subd. 5. Outdoor toilets.
Section 1025:10. kering Public Peace and Safety.
Subd. 1. As set forth in the subdivisions *kdch follow, the following are
declared to be nuisances endangering public peace and safety.
• Subd. 2. Trees, hedges, signs, billboards, fences or other obstructions
which interfere with maintenance of right-of-way or which hinder persons
using any right-of-way from seeing traffic.
Subd. 3. The piling, storing or keeping of old machinery, junk or debris.
Subd. 4. The unhoused storage of pipe, lumber, forms, machinery, old
unlicensed wrecked or junked cars or car bodies, other than occupational
materials.
Subd. 5. The unlawful interference with, obstruction, or tendency to
obstruct or render dangerous for passage a lake, stream, lagoon, canal or
basin, or a public park, square, street, alley or highway.
Subd. 6. Any act or condition which, in azu way, renders the public
insecure in life or in its use of property.
Section 1025:15. Dangerous Structures.
Subd. 1. AxW building or structure is a public nuisance which 3s
dangerous to public safety or health or to other property by reason of
conditions set forth in the subdivisions which follow.
0
• Section 1025x1$, Subd. 2
Sabd.
2.
Damage by
fire.
Subd.
3.
Defective
chimneys or decay. •
Subd,
h.
Dilapidated condition or decay.
Subd.
5.
Defective
electric wiring.
Subd.
6.
Defective
gas installation.
Subd.
7.
Defective
heating apparatus.
Subd.
8.
Defective
sewage disposal system or plumbing.
health or
•
r] L
0
Sas A-D*mss
Sas A D*Ks
s4�+0 Ipi %*cr-
0 Afo
3 as INpAwts
-Zvi TEO Wk
a• �
e7
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
-
----_ ��'r'� r . '✓1JNrv. 55350
March 9, 1987
Doug McGraw, Chairman
Airport Commission
725 Harmony Lane
Hutchinson, Mn 55350
SUBJECT: MN LISTING - FIVE YEAR AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Dear Doug,
Attached appears to be an "important" opportunity to schedule airport
improvements between individual cities and MN aeronautics (DOT) from 1988-
1992.
Please study the cost assumptions to assist you in determining the best
improvements for the dollar cost.
Also, several of you may have a copy of the airport "master plan," which
• is dated, nevertheless, it could be somewhat helpful.
I believe Bonnie Baumetz (City Hall) would be able to borrow you a plan,
if you cannot locate your airport master plan.
The City Council may ultimately be involved because these projects
generally will have a local dollar match.
Therefore, I would suggest your list of improvements, if any, be
forwarded thru the City Council, prior to the April 24, 1987 submittal date.
Lastly and not directly related, please be advised that the City Council
approved having a second appraiser review the airport DOT appraisals.
Sincerely,
Gary D. 1 tz
City Administrator
cc: ayor and council
Ralph Neumann
Bonnie Baumetz
• Ken Merrill
encl.
GP/bb
�C�
March 4, 1987
Mr. Gary D. Plots
City Administrator
Care of City Hall
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Plots:
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building,
55350
St. Paul, MN 55155
F-1
L
Peons (612) 296-8046
The Aeronautics Division sees an ever increasing need to do longer -range planning for.
our programs and to better identify the future demands on anticipated financial
resources. Consequently, we are initiating efforts to develop a Five -Year Airport
Development Program. for funding improvements at publicly -owned airports in Minnesota.
e expwwt thatwWis program will provide a better balance among the competing
requests for airport improvement funding in light of needs, revenue resources and
constraints, and social, economic, and environmental impacts.
The Five -Year Airport Development Program will be a statement of the scope and
scheduling of proposed im rovementa to air oris in the state system. The program
w e up a on s yearly basis. However, the process of developing the proposed •
project schedules will be a continuous one. Actual accomplishment of the proposed
projects will depend upon the airport sponsor's improvement intentions, Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) decisions, federal and state funding availability,
priorities, and estimated project costs. The published program will not reflect all
of the individual airport needs and deficiencies known to exist, but those
improvements identified by local government airport sponsors for which they are
seeking state or federal assistance, and which are found to be of the highest
priority to maintain aviation safety and operational characteristics in the state of
Minnesota.
Submittal of the statement of project intentions by the airport sponsor is
advantageous to both the sponsor and our Aeronautics Division. The advantage to the
air ort s onsor is robathe most si nificant. It encourages the sponsor to look
at future seeds of their bl airportallows for optimum planning and funding of
the proposed improvements. The obvious advantage to the Aeronautics Division is the
ability to identify potential new projects and develop a long-range plan to bring
these potential projects to completion. The sponsor's indication of their desire to
pursue a project gives the Aeronautics Division a better opportunity to allocate the
resources to provide for that project's development.
The multi-year program is important not only for internal Aeronautics Division
management but also as a means to better communicate with the FAA, the State
Legislature, local governments, and the general public.
0
An Equal Opportunity Employer
March 4, 1987
• Page 2
Proposals are now before Congress on the reauthorization of the Federal Airway and
Airport Improvement Program. The Administration's proposal includes a block grant
program permitting qualified states to assume administrative responsibility for their
share of the grant funding available. The Administration proposes that 22 percent be
set aside for "other than commercial service airports" and apportioned to the states.
The states would use their share of this money where they desired within the limits
of an agreement between the FAA and them. The FAA would require that:
- the state has an agency capable of administering the block grant;
- the state has a satisfactory airport system planning process;
- the state complies with procedural requirements for administering the block
grant;
- the state has an acceptable programming process; and
- the state supplies the FAA with program information as required.
If a state meets the qualifications to administer these funds, the FAA would have
only an advisory role in their use. The result would be fewer requirements imposed
on the use of block grants than now apply to Airport Improvement Program funds.
Should this proposed legislation pass and be implemented, the Five -Year Airport
Development Program we are formulating will be a necessary element in our
administration of the federal grants.
In an effort to assist you in looking at your airport's future, we have prepared the
•
following attached documentation:
- an airport development checklist, which must be completed by each airport
sponsor and returned to the Aeronautics Division;
- an airport development sheet for your airport from Minnesota's 1981 Airport
Development Guide;
- a list of approximate total costs for various airport improvements; and
- a map identifying the Airport Development Section's regional engineering teams.
P He would like to impress upon you the importance of your participation. This will be
an annual procedure, and we need your input to make this program successful. The
results of this effort will determine the size and timing of capital improvement
projects for airports.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact your regional airport
representatives. They will assist you in filling out the development checklist by
answering questions, resolving problems, or will meet with you to discuss your
airport needs with you.
40
March 4, 1987
Page 3
Please return your completed checklist by April 24, 1987, to:
Harold R. Nemec
Director, Airport Development
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Aeronautics Division
Transportation Building - Room 417
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
v 1Sincerely,
Raymond J ought
Assistant Commissioner
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Aeronautics Division
Enclosure
•
•
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST
( 11E71JR11 .Y APRIL 24, 1967 )
TAL DeROVIDaNT PROGRAM
Fiscal
ye.rs
bag in
July 1 and and I
the
following
Jura 30
WORK PROPOSED
FY
I FY
I FY
I FY
I FY
I ESTIMATED
.........................................................................
88.1.89.1.90-
.............................
.90_
. 89I.
91I.
92.
ICDSTS
Turf runway construction or reconstruction
.....................•--•-••..................._.......•••••.............
I
I
I.....................
Turf runway extension
.........................................................................
....
....
....I....I....I----••--------------
1
Paved runway construction or reconstruction
I_...I....I....I------..------------.
I
I
........................................................................:I_...I..
Paved runway extension
I_...I....I........i....i..---..............._i
........................................................................
Paved runway grooving
.........................................................................I....I....I_...I....
I
I
�....
I
-•----•...._........i
Paved runway overlay
.........................................................................
....I..._
I•
Turf taxiway construction or reconstruction
..........................................
I....L.
....I....I....'..__.....----•-------
---.I....L•
Paved taxiway construction or reconstruction
---•....................•-••---....................................... -
I
I-•--
L...---------------------
I
Pavedtaxiway overlay
......................................................................••-
•--
...I........
..---------•-------Paved I
,--
Paved or turf apron construction, reconstruction, or expansion
........................................................................I........I....�........
...
•• .-I....I....
••
••---••----••-.---�
L.
Paved apron overlay
.........................................................................I....
L...
....I_...
---•-----•-.-•--...I
I-.
Paved or aggregate parking lot construction or reconstruction
L...
L...I".'I--•••--•.---------...I
.........................................................................
Paved parking lot overlay
....................................................................I--.-I....I....,....I..._I--.-------•----------�
. ..
....
Paved or aggregate entrance road construction or reconstruction
I
. . . . ...... . ..... . ... . . . .....
Waved entrance road overlay
I
I
---------------------------------------------------------------•--••----I----I----
HwVar site preparation and/or expansion
...................••--••---.._.._.._.........._....................................I
----
-•.-------•----------I
Terminsl/A/D building construction Including site preparation
.........................................................................
---••----------------I
i '
Maintenance/storage building construction, including site preparation
................................................................•--•---•
'----
I••••---•I----I••--�.--•.••----••••••-•.-I
..:.ding ......ling or expansion
I
�---------------------
•I
Drainage system improvements
...................................•---•--.....-•-----•--•--•-•--...._...........
----I
....
....
....
....
Obstruction Obstruction removals or relocations
-----••--------------•----------._......._...............................
'I'll•---
---------------------
Aerial applicator spray wash facility construction
....
....
....
'....I....I•._---•-------••-----J
.........................................................................
Automated weather station
....
....
----
i
.........................................................................
Fuel facility construction or reconstruction
....
•---
__--
.'..
....
.____.._..----i
.........................................................................I....I....I..
Safety and security fencing...................................+....`....I.___I....,....
I
...I._..I------•••----------•-I
I.....................�
Airport signing
.........................................................................
....
....
....
.....................
Maintenance equipment (Indicate type: )
.........................................................................
..•.
....
.... I._..
I....
I-••--------..--
I
Planning grants (Indicate type: )
.............................................................................I....I7_...I_...I....I---.----------•---...I
I
I
I
Consultant cervices..........................................•I'---I._..,....+--_.
I•---I---------------------I
land acquisition I
.........................................................................
____
....
.._. I_...
I
I
Runway/taxiway lighting system installation or revision
I_........
........ _...I
rack repair and sealing
—'
_..I....I
.....................I
Fogtreatment...........................................................I.._.I._..I....I'-•-I•...,.................----I
i......
I
HANGAR CONSTRUCTION REVOLVING ACCOUNT
WORK PROPOSED SSI ev 19FY 0 1 I i7 I ESTIMATED
91 j
......................................................................... ._.
T. -hangar wore........ I•_. I... I__- " i
Multiple plane storage hangar
............................................ ............................. I ---- I I' I ...I.._•I•-._..._---
PAINT STRIPING PROGRAM
......................................•----....-----.._....._....---.....j. I
Runway and taxiway pavement working ----•---•---•---• --.I
I I
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
....................................•.---...._.....___.......___.........
Taxiway reflectors
Tem; orery Airport Lighting System (TALS) ...._.:..-------
j.....................
Mon•Directionsl Beacon (NDB) installation and/or takeover
....tall instrument ........ .. ...
Runway End identification Lighting System (RE1LS)
____________________•-••...._...__________....__._._.._...__....._.____I•_..I.....•••I____I' ' .....................
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)
... .. ........ . ... .. ........
........ .... .
Medius Approach Lighting System/Runway Alignment indicator Lighting
System (MALS/ RAILS)
......................................................................... _
Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System (ODALS)
-----••-•••____...... ____...... •..... __........ ....... ._........
__....__.
High or Medium Intensity Runway Lighting System (MIRLS or MIRLS) I -••-I--•--•-•.----.----••
....... ____... ___....... __________________________________•_-.....__...__
3 -function radio controller
very high frequency omni range system (VOR)
Precision lending system installation (ILS or MLS) i
......................................................................
Radio uticm aqui paeent
.........................................................................
Beacon installation or repair
...............................................................•---....• I ..I___.I_...I.._.I....
Lighted windsock
..............................•-----.........._......__..__._..._....--- I... -I I..........._......_.....j
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (Indicate say additional projects or information desired)
....I-_..I..__I---------------------
---------------------
----------
. . . . . . . . . . .
..............'--.__................................ I. �•
._..I....I.._.I---------------------i
I.._I....j----------------- - i
1 Mn/DOT TP49249-01 16/60)
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT Minnesota Department of Transportation
(612) 296.1616
N AIRPORT: Hutchinson 1lunicipal
` CITY: Hutchinson
Ir DISTRICT: 8
REGION: 6E COUNTY: _McLeod
NASP NUMBER:
GENERAL COMMENTS:
PLANNING FACTORS
PLANNING PERIOD
YEAR
RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT
1979
1983
2000
BASED AIRCRAFT - TOTAL
19
22
48
SINGLE ENGINE
17
528.0
43
MULTI-ENGfNE PROP < 12,500 LBS.
Extend parallel T/W to R/W 14.32 to Cull length. Install T/W reflectors. Expand
MULTI -ENGINE PROP > 12,500 LBS.
0
0
0
JET
0
0
0
OTHER
ANNUAL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS (0001
15.2
19.2
27.0
ANNUAL ITINERANT OPERATIONS (000)
5.2
9.0
12.0
LOCAL OPERATIONS (000)
10.0
10.2
OPERATIONS OVER 12,500 LBS. (000)-
0.0
0.0
0.5
AIR CARRIER OPERATIONS (000)
U.0
0.0
0.0
ANNUAL INSTRUMENT APPROACHES
72
1 So
674
ENPLANED PASSENGERS (000) AC!GA
./13.7
—/17.2
-/24.3
PEAK HOUR OPERATIONS
36.0
45.0
87.0
PEAK HOUR PASSENGERS
16.0
44.0
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION"
OPERATIONAL CLASSIFICATION'
BU
GU
GU
-.NOT AC **STA TE AIRPORT SYSTEM "*FEDERAL CLASSIFICATION
95
TOTAL COST
YEAR
RECOMMENDED DEVELOPMENT
(1980 DOLLARS)
10001
1981- 1983
Expand hangar area. Security items. Install REIIS and radio controller.
113.5
1984 - 1985
lend acquisition. Extend R/W 14-32 to 4000'x 75'. Expand apron area. Const.
528.0
spray wash facility.
Extend parallel T/W to R/W 14.32 to Cull length. Install T/W reflectors. Expand
1986-2000
apron. Const. and pave new entr rd. and parking lot. Const. A/D bldg. Expand
7 30. 0
hangar area.
95
COST ASSUMPTIONS
( 1"S DOLLARS )
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The following are the general land requirements for airport establishment or expansion.
500 to 1,000 foot runway extension ................................. 40 acres
Newrunway ......................................................... 60 acres
New landing strip airport.........................................200 acres
New intermediate airport..........................................250 acres
New key system airport............................................570 acres
New crosswind runway...........................................80.120 acres
The following land costs are dependent upon airport location and land holdings.
Priam: agricultural lard...........................................5900/acre
Fair agricultural land.............................................700/acre
Moderate agricultural land.........................................500/acre
Scrub or non-agricultural land.....................................300/acre
The following costs are to be used for runways, taxiways, aprons, and hangar sites:
generally; good soils are granular, fair soils are loam mixtures, and poor soils
are clays, peat, marl, or nick.
AIRPORT CLASSIFICATION
SOIL TYPE
COST PER SQUARE YARD
Landing Strip
Good
$2.25
Lending Strip
Fair
2.25
Landing Strip
Poor
2.25
Intermediate
Good
16.75
Intermediate
Fair
28.00
Intermediate
Poor
39.25
Key System
Good
19.00
Key System
fair
30.25
Key System
Pier
41.25
Key - Scheduled Air Transport
Good
22.25
Key - Scheduled Air Transport
Fair
33.50
Key - Scheduled Air Transport
Poor
44.75
when widening a runny, one must calculate s 1 inch overlay for the existing runway.
110 Lbs./sq. yd.
i.e. ( square yards x ------------•----- ) x S25/ton - sq. yd, x 1.375 . cost
2,000 Lb./ton
When strengthing a runway, a 3 inch overlay is used.
i.e. 3 x square yards x 1.375 - 4.125 x square yards : cost
The following are same average airport improvement costs.
Groove runway...........................................$2,000/100 tin. ft.
Establish turf ...................................................1,000/sere
Frost heave correction..........................................67,000 each
Obstruction removal (trees, brush, etc.).........................2,000/acre
Extension obstruction removal ........................... 11,000-112,D00/site
Construct entrance road.........................................11,000/site
Construct parking lot ........................................... 11,D00/site
Pave entrance road..............................................17,000/site
Pave perking lot................................................17,000/site
Pave entrance road and parking lot...............................33,000/site
Construct entrance road and parking lot .........................56,000/site
Arrival and departure building
lending strip.........................................28,000 unit cost
intermediate or key airport...........................39,000 unit cost
key system airport....................................56,000 unit cost
•
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
Maintenance building or harngar............................263,000
unit cost
Maintenance building addition.............................101,000
unit cost
T-hangar........................................................12,500/unit
Multiple plarw storage hangar ...............................
220.224/sq. ft.
Install utilities...............................................13,000/site
•
Drainsgs system.................................................72,000/site
Construct spray wash facility ••..............
........25,000 unit cost
Fuelfacility....................................r.........
Expand fuel facility......••................................9,000
16,000 unit cost
unit cost
Jet fuel facility ......• ..................................34,000
unit cast
Automated weather station..................................57,000
unit cost
Mower ......................................................22,000
unit cost
Snow plow..................................................78,000
unit cost
Snow blower...............................................168,000
unit cost
Security items
unit cost
Larding strip...............................................2,000/site
unit cost
intermediate or key airport.................................6,000/site
unit cost
Airport signing ..................................................2.000/site
lin.ft.
Crack repair and sealing.....................................50.60/lin.
ft.
Fog Treatment ..................................................20.22/sq.yd.
NAVIGATIONAL AIDS
Mediun Intensity Runway Lighting System (MIRLS)..........
$112,000 unit cost
High Intensity Runway Lighting System (HIRLS).............
134,000 unit cost
Extension of M1RLS or HIRLS
500 a 200 feet................................................11,000
1,000 + 200 ft..................................................22,000
1,500 s 200 ft..................................................33,000
Temporary Airport Lighting System (TALS)....................
9,000 unit cost
Runway End Identification Lighting System (REILS).....................5,000
(cost per end, assume both ends)
Omnidirectional approach lighting system ...................
50,000 unit cost
Median Approach Lighting System/Runway At ignment
Indicator Lighting System (MALS/RAILS)...............
140,000 unit cost
Beacon .....................................................30,000
unit cost
Lighted wind sock...........................................5,000
unit cost
3 -function radio controller.................................3,000
unit cost
Taxiway reflectors........................................600/1,000
lin.ft.
Very high frequency omnirange (VOR).......................200,000
unit cost
Land cost ..................................................10,000/site
Non -Directional Resew (NDB)...............................48,000
unit cost
lard cost..................................................10,000/site
Outer Marker (OM)..........................................34,000
unit cost
Middle Marker (MM).........................................34,000
unit cost
lard cost...................................................1,000/site
Compass locator (LOM)......................................34,000
unit cost
land cost ..................................................10,000/site
Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI)......................
..20,000/end
Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) .........................70,000
unit cost
Instrument Landing System (ILS)...........................400,000
unit cost
Microwave Larding System (MLS)............................800,000
unit Cost
Electrical services building...............................10,000
unit cost
•IIILi•M •ROMYL, _�
t �
lilt -.Y• .i _--.�_-.-r-
- - -rMtY � RIVM i V1MIM• '
• LINA RILL!
�MMIII[•
roll"
•
A•& -
TWO
11R1u:
TR•R LARM
IL i .-• I 44 ION III, I' 1 .
1'1•iY • } i } '1}y
RNItR
Mk a"
_______ •
- ItLRY RARIM
• •R[RNM I RIVER
OWN
• Y
N. TOR[ WLL!• I= MN4 MANIOIO _AITNIM
!tRNA MTTLt _• _ _J A/If[
_ �L "-MR-
49%
Yt
►ALU• L :[ . - - ----
M[NMN
•ItCRlI�•� _C --------
_-_____. LpY•
•INATO• - - - - -' - Ot[IITIo00 I. - � UMM ' L MpTMO�
•
- -- - - - - "O �'t nARtIRN I MOORY •!{ aOIA •- •
•
C WRLt
IRTORVILL! KNNIIOOCR 1 �""r1Y
MII[Tpl •
•J WILE" L 1lIOi tIMRALO
•
.OM --
eo TORR
°!• • •.cLT
I CVtltTN-
%IwI" rw
NIMIN /"&Rom
MLY
CL001KT••OYLYTN
r� !NT NARMR
LAN[
- RAROtTW
•
MORA •�
am CITT
• UMTZVIO[D _ _ _ L CRP TAL - ` tZ/ "UL
DAO[O•' • TIY
NNTCMINON •
am
-' - OLIVIA• SLID
WRMIALL_ _ _RtD•000
•
FALLS
TRKT•
III
tLAT7 ■
TAL •. ST. RANI
!bill• • �� ♦M RAW
C101A -
—, _ AI LAKE
[LNO
- [T RtTd • �� . -
JJ ON" Iw YAMRL70 •fMAY1LT
® � •O•ATOMRI
TIAltu•
• 1 D09
�II •RDeNtrnR
WORTHINGTON' r11RYONT •tLLt• l • AN[TIN
• • )•
•
JACR[ON r r •.Nr r LALUOT
[A
•IN
•
RI•IMORO
0
D7>ZE' MM
Harry Nemec
296-3582
NORTH MUM
Dave Nybakken
296-8545
Mike Spielmann
297-1522
Dacmar Runyan
296-3933
CENMAL RDGIGN
Jim Groehler
296-8150
Roti Lloyd
296-7929
SOUTH IMMCN
Rich Wolters
296-8203
Dick Luhrsen
296-2788
•IN
•
RI•IMORO
0