cp12-22-1987 cr
#..**OG
.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1987
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Ken Veal, Seventh Day Adventist Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 8, 1987, Special
Meeting of December 11, 1987 and Bid Opening of December 17, 1987
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - November 1987
2. Nursing Home Board Minutes of November 19, 1987
3. Planning Commission Minutes of November 17, 1987
(b) Applications for Renewal of 1988 Gambling License
(c) Applications for Renewal of 1988 Cigarette License
- No am
(d) Applications for Snow Removal Permit
1. Martin Barnes 4. Steve Sturges
2. Florian Thode 5. Randy Blake
3 Stan Ristow 6. Rodney Rouch
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and issue permits
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
(a) 1988 Small Cities Development Program Applications for Funding
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
funding application
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Recognition of Stearnswood And Hutchinson Telephone Company for
Contribution to Purchase Equipment for Hutchinson Police Department
Acton -
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No, 8670 - Transferring $30,000 from Liquor Store to
General Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 22, 1987
(b) Resolution No. 8671 - Release of Pledged Security to First Bank of
Minnesota
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(c) Resolution No. 8672 - Resolution Adopting Federal Revenue Sharing
And Economic Development Loan Fund Budgets for Fiscal Year 1987
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(d) Resolution No. 8663 - Resolution for Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Furnishings In Police Station
(DEFERRED DECEMBER 17, 1987)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid
(b) Consideration of Establishing An Advisory Committee On "Design Review"
Prior to Building Permit Issuance In Downtown Area (DEFERRED 12-8-87)
Action - Lotion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8666
(c) Consideration of Job Description And Grade Classification for 1988
Budgeted Employee In Park & Recreation Department (DEFERRED 12-8-87)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of McLeod County Heritage And Cultural Center Requests
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve requests
(c) Consideration of Improvements On T.H. 22 from Fair Avenue to Biscay
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(d) Consideration of PUD/Conditional Use Permit Submitted By Koosman
& Rice Co. with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
2
CITY C UIC I L AGERDA - DECEMBER -212, 1987
(e) Consideration of Preliminary* Plat Submitted By Lowell Brecht with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission (Within Two bile
Radius)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County with no objection
(f) Consideration of Preliminary Plat Submitted By Roger Siemsen with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission (Within Two Mile
Radius)
Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection
(g) Consideration of Subdivision Agreement for Siemsen Estates
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(h) Consideration of Joint Meeting Between Hospital Board and City Council
to Consider Multi Hospital Affiliations
Action -
(i) Consideration of Recommendation for Annual Wage Adjustment
Action -
(j) Consideration of Designating 1985 Ford Squad Car As Police Chief's
Unmarked Car And Authorizing Preparation of Specifications And Bidding
Process for 1988 Squad Car
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(k) Consideration of Purchasing Four Transcriber Recorders And Four Hand
Held Tape Recorders for Police Department
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve purchase
(1) Consideration of Recommendation of McLeod Regional Rail Authority for
$2,500 Annual Payment Towards State/Federal Grant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(m) Consideration of Decertifying Previously Certified Tax Deficiencies for
1986 And 1988 Collection for S & L Rehab (101 Park Place)
Action -
(n) Consideration of Surfacing for T.H. 7 East Improvements
Action -
3
s
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 22, 1987
(o) Consideration of Establishing Special City Council Meeting for
January 4, 1988 at 5:00 P.M.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve meeting date
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
4
M I MITES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1987
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, John Mlinar,
Marlin Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky. Also present: City Administrator Gary
D. Plotz, Director of Engineering Eugene Anderson and City Attorney G. Barry
Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Stanley Hart.
3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of November 24, 1987 and bid opening of
November 25, 1987 were approved as distributed,
PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES: Mayor Ackland presented Garey Knudsen and G. Barry
Anderson with plaques in appreciation of their serving on City boards.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - NOVEMBER 1987
2. POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 23, 1987
3. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 30, 1987
4. HOSPITAL BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 20, 1987
(b) APPLICATION FOR SNOW REMOVAL PERMITS
1. DAVID BLAKE
2. LLOYD CHRISTENSEN
3. MILT HANSON
4. DICK EVERT
5. STEVE VACAK
6. RHONDA CROTTEAU
7. EDWIN KARG
The notion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, to approve the report and minutes and to issue permits Motion
carried unanimously.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
None.
6, COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) UPDATE REPORT BY C.A.M. ON POLICE STATION AND CHANGE ORDER FOR DOOR
POSITION SWITCH
Mr. Vergil Florhaug of C.A.M. reported on the following regarding the
police station project:
1 1� f
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1987
1, Allied Mechanical Contract - The bid and contract recognized and
accepted the three addendums which made for the change. Allied
Mechanical will be doing the work.
2. Installation of Cricket to Drain Near Roof Parapet - Left off the
plans.
Add: Schatz Construction $350.00
Pinske Builders, Inc. N.C.
3. Credit for Deleting Door Position Switch from Door 117B -
Subtract: Straughn Hardware ($ 85.00)
4. Credit for Two Wall Racks Not Required - Specified in two sections.
Subtract: Lau Sales ($ 88.00)
5. Caulking of Joint Between Pre -Cast Plank And Non -Bearing Masonry
Walls In Basement
Add: Carciofini Caulking Co. $275.00
E.J. Pinske Builders, Inc. N.C.
6. Change Order - Provide Lock & Door Position Switch On Door 125 A
Add: Straughn Hardware $565.00
Schatz Construction 28.80
McNerney Industries 215.00
$808.80 TOTAL
7. Fire Damper for Revised Duct Work
Add: Allied Mechanical $216.77
8. Soffitt Vents to Relieve Air from Attic -
Standard Roof Vent (13) 109 - 130
Installation 468.00
9. Cupola Area Designed In Wood (3) $ 77.00
10. Credit On Hollow Metal ($ 92.75)
11, Tempered Glass - Proposal Request No. 7
Add: At Entry $108.00
Doors #120 & #122 180.00
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1987
A question was raised on the last billings received from C.A.M. It was
reported that an access panel was needed and billed under general con-
ditions for a cost of $36.04. Precast concrete for a bearing support
was ordered from Rockite Silo in September 1987.
Mayor Ackland commented on C.A.M.'s letter dated November 29, 1987.
The City Attorney stated he felt the architect had some responsibility.
Following discussion, Alderman Carla moved to approve the change orders
as presented by C.A.M. this evening. Alderman Torgerson seconded the
motion and unanimously carried.
Mr. Florhaug reported the contractor will begin sheetrocking next Mon-
day, and the project should be close to completion deadline of Febru-
ary 1, 1988. The State has approved the plan for the police station.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 14/87 - AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO INCLUDE CERTAIN UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY
BORDERED BY LAND WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS AND ABUTTING THEREON
(DEFOREST WAGNER ANNEXATION)
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carla, to
waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 768. Motion unanimously
carried.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 8663 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Following discussion, Alderman Carla moved to defer Resolution No. 8663
to the next meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 8664 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING LIQUOR FUND, WATER/SEWER/
REFUSE FUND AND CENTRAL GARAGE FUND BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1988
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carla,
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8664. Motion unanimously
carried.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 8665 - RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
NO. 4; DIRECTING THE MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR TO DISTRIBUTE THE CAPTURED
ASSESSED VALUE OF TAX INCREMENT AREA FOUR AMONG AFFECTED TAXING
DISTRICTS IN 1988
The notion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Carla
and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8665. Motion carried unanimously.
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 8667 - TRANSFERRING $30,427 FROM THE 1985 TAX INCREMENT
CONSTRUCTION FUND TO 1985 TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1987
The motion, was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8667. Motion unanimously
carried.
(f) DEBTLSERVVNICEOFUND6TO 1982 TAX DEBTRSERVIICEIFUNDTAX INCREMENT
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8668. Motion carried
unanimously.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ROAD WAY EASEMENT ALONG SOUTH BORDER OF CITY WATER
TOWER PROPERTY FOR KEVIN FROEMING (DEFERRED NOVEMBER 24, 1987)
Upon the request of Mr. Froeming, Alderman Carls moved to defer to the
next Council meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF MERGER OF NORTH AMERICAN CABLE SYSTEMS AND STAR
MIDWEST, INC. (DEFERRED NOVEMBER 24, 1987)
The City Attorney stated he had checked with other cities, and he saw
no reason not to approve the merger. Alderman Carls moved to approve
and authorize signing the transfer form. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR WELL AND WELL HOUSE 10. 7
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 25, 1987)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to ap-
prove awarding the bid to the low contractor, LTP Enterprises of Fargo,
North Dakota, in the amount of $145,317. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON "DESIGN REVIEW"
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE IN DOWNTOWN AREA
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 10, 1987)
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
defer. Motion unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY REPORT ON 1988 PROJECTS
(DEFERRED DECEMBER 2, 1987)
Director Anderson presented a report on the cost of proposed 1988 proj-
ects, starting with part 3, Following discussion, the City Engineer
was directed to prepare a report showing the projects mentioned for
1988 consideration, with a breakdown of costs.
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1987
RECESS: The City Council adjourned at 9:20 P.M. for a 15 minute recess.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF STURGES DITCH DISPUTE
City Attorney Anderson stated he was still working on obtaining a writ-
ten statement that verbal permission was given to put in the disputed
ditch and that the party was aware the project was underway. No action
was taken.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS TO REFURBISH 1971 WARD LAFRANCE
PUMPER FIRE TRUCK
Fire Department members Brad Emans and Craig Almquist appeared before
the Council to request permission to advertise for bids to refurbish a
1971 pumper fire truck.
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve and advertise
for bids to be opened on December 30, 1987 at 5:00 P.M. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF STAFFING/JOB DESCRIPTIONS/GRADES/ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
FOR WATER/WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
Personnel Director Hazel Sitz and Director Randy DeVries presented data
on seven items for consideration. Following lengthy discussion, Alder-
man Carle moved to approve items 1-7 with the recommendations contained
in the memorandum from Directors Sitz and DeVries. Notion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF BID FROM MINNESOTA BODY FOR 1976 HUTCHMOBILE
It was reported two bids were received for the 1976 Hutchmobile. The
Minnesota Department of Transportation approved the high bid, with 90
percent of the sale price going to MN/DOT since the bus was purchased
as part of a demonstration project, and 10 percent to the City.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carle, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to approve the bid from Minnesota Body in the
amount of $850. Motion unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING POLICY ON STATE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ON
EITHER CONCRETE OR ASPHALT SURFACING
Following discussion, Alderman Carle moved to approve concrete surfac-
ing for the Highway 22 project only, with no policy change. Notion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR CROP DAMAGE FROM PROJECT 10. 87-17
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1.987,
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, sec-
onded by Alderman Carl:, to approve payment of 1500 each to Carl Ricke-
man and Deforest Wagner. Motion unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL BY LARRY BETHKE FOR CHANGE IN SITE PLAN IN
HELLAND'S FIRST ADDITION
Following discussion, Alderman Torgersoni moved to approve the change in
the site plan. Motion seconded by Alderman Carla and carried unani-
mously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carla, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to approve the status quo of policy in place in the
past to close City offices at 3:00 P.M. on Christmas Eve. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF VOTING MACHINE REPLACEMENTS
Following discussion, Alderman Carla moved to get the opinion of the
election judges on the optical scan voting machines. Motion seconded
by Alderman, Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF JOB DESCRIPTION AND GRADE CLASSIFICATION FOR 1988
BUDGETED EMPLOYEE IN PARK & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Following lengthy discussion regarding the job description and pay
grade for a new position in the Park & Recreation Department, Alderman
Mlinar moved for the staff to bring back a new recommendation to the
City Council. Motion seconded by Alderman Carla and carried unani-
mously.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reported a non -jury court hearing was held to-
day regarding the Sam Ulland lawsuit. The Judge granted Mr. Ulland a
60 -day extension in which to repair sewer, water, electrical and gas
services in the Midwest Trailer Court to meet City codes and require-
ments.
Mention was made that Mayor Ackland had inquired when the Council
should consider the annual wage adjustment. Mr. Plotz stated he was
ready to make a recommendation. It was the consensus of the Council to
put this item on the December 22, 1987 Council agenda.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS
Alderman Carla asked about the arrangements for Wednesday night's
1#1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 8, 1987
interviews with the three finalists for police chief.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland commented on the agreement with Johnson for property he
purchased and asked about the dollars escrowed.
The Mayor stated he would like to see the City Engineer's five percent
pay increase at the end of his six month probation period put into ef-
fect and be retroactive to his anniversary date. The motion was made
by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky, to approve the five
percent retroactive pay increase. Motion unanimously carried.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky asked about the deferred assessments being put on
the computer. The City Attorney stated it was being done, but some
policy decisions needed to be made.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Carle, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:27 P.M.
7
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1987
The special meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 5:00 P.M. The fol-
lowing were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, John Mlinar
(arrived at 5:08 P.X.), Marlin Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky. Also present: City
Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Director of Engineering Eugene Anderson.
P0BLIC 110I10 - P' BCT 10, 87-58
The public hearing for Project No. 87-38 was called to order, and Mayor Ackland
read Publication No. 3761.
Ms. Elizabeth Brusehaver, manager of Greencastle, raised a question on the
buildings north of Greencastle and if the assessment amount was for only the one
property.
Engineer Anderson stated everyone in the area was notified of the hearing, but
be thought only Greencastle would be assessed for the cost of the hydrant. The
former owner, Mr. Newell Veed, was supposed to install the fire hydrant, which
• was never done. No assessment roll had been prepared at this time inasmuch as
no bids had been received.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to close the hearing at 5:07 P.M. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
Alderman Carls moved to approve Project No. 87-38 and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 8669. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unani-
mously.
APPOIIITM OF POLICE CHIEF
Mayor Ackland reported the three finalists for the position of police chief had
been interviewed by the Council. It was his recommendation to make an offer to
Steven Madson of Mason City, Iowa to become police chief, effective January 4,
1988.
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unani-
mously carried, to appoint the police chief according to the terms arrived at
with Steven Madson.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:10 P.M.
•
2
0
•
•
MINUTES
BID OPENING
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1987
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at 10:00 A.M.
Also present were: Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, Alderman Marlin Torger-
son, Sgt. John Gregor, Architect John Korngiebel, and Administrative Secretary
Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No, 3766, Advertisement for Bids, Furnishings for
Hutchinson Police Station, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened
and read:
Family Rexali Drug
Hutchinson, MN $21,228.96
Marco Business Products
St. Cloud, MN 22,163.00
Berg Office Supplies
St. Cloud, MN 20,943.58
Allen Office Supplies
Hutchinson, MN 17,374.00
Bennett Office Supplies
Villmar, MN 23,094.95
The bids were referred to Korngiebel Architects for a recommendation at the City
Council meeting of December 22, 1987.
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 A.M.
�Z,
4 -ql (4
NOVEMBER
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FINANCIAL REPORT - 1987
NOVEMBER
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
NOV.
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
0
ACTUAL
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
881086.29
1314700.00
433613.71
0.67
LICENSES
12.00
18137.66
16950.00
-1187.66
1.07
PERMITS AND FEES
8933.46
127806.76
66900.00
-60908.76
1.91
INTER -GOVERNMENT REVENUE
-5182.66
794035.99
1087494.00
293458.01
0.73
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
21024.07
490319.06
508144.00
17824.94
0.96
FINES & FORFEITS
4176.24
37665.82
29600.00
-B065.B2
1.27
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
22682.17
146285.85
131800.00
-14485.85
1.11
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
60262.50
287762.50
429000.00
141237.50
0.67
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
565.18
1010.68
500.00
-510.68
2.02
TOTAL
112472.94
2784112.61
3585088.00
800975.39
0.78
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
671.37
29378.88
31467.00
2088.12
0.93
CITY ADM./CITY CLERK
4700.93
118205.81
133954.00
15748.19
0.68
ELECTIONS
401.69
7133.20
4850.00
-2293.20
1.47
FINANCE
8181.46
181514.43
197266.00
15753.57
0.92
MOTOR VEHICLE
2988.86
68233.88
66037.00
-2196.68
1.03
ASSESSING
19700.00
20300.00
19700.00
-600.00
1.03
LEGAL
2387.21
50231.26
32807.00
-17424.26
1.53
PLANNING
280.16
11928.80
11375.00
-553.60
1.05
ITY HALL
1551.05
31331.08
40083.00
8751.92
0.78
ECREATION BUILDING
1005.24
37631.17
66470.00
2BB36.63
0.57
POLICE DEPARTMENT
37032.40
706051.93
741043.00
34991.07
0.95
FIRE DEPARTMENT
2013.B9
92656.43
91585.00
-1071.43
1.01
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
1183.73
30635.84
37650.00
7014.16
0.81
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
2020.57
65333.53
61346.00
16012.47
0.60
CIVIL DEFENSE
0.00
116.78
825.00
708.22
0.14
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
FIRE MARSHALL
1458.96
36183.06
41023.00
4639.94
0.88
ENGINEERING
6830.51
170748.99
192643.00
21894.01
0.89
STREETS & ALLEYS
16110.29
303B04.72
359103.00
55298.28
0.85
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
6178.41
54514.13
70700.00
16185.87
0.77
LIBRARY
366.88
58936.59
64696.00
5759.41
0.91
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
1966..32
64450.51
53690.00
-10760.51
1.20
PARK/REC. ADMIN.
3363.70
77163.83
87392.00
1022B.17
0.88
RECREATION
2950.06
113284.98
128122.00
14837.02
0.86
CIVIC ARENA
9902.69
112434.45
114172.00
1737.55
0.98
PARK DEPARTMENT
14359.61
333561.87
362092.00
28530.13
0.92
CEMETERY
1223.95
39944.97
43790.00
3845.03
0.91
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2809.51
29134.7B
33150.00
4015.22
0.88
DEBT SERVICE
1500.00
48896.10
50396.00
1499.90
0.97
AIRPORT
561.11
49051.41
50572.00
1520.59
0.97
TRANSIT
2679.10
104530.10
121734.00
17203.90
0.86
COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
1082.58
15554.79
0.00
-15554.79
UNALLOCATED
1086.62
183365.45
253203.00
71837.55
0.72
0TAL
158748.86
3246243.63
3585088.00
338844.25
0.91
4 -ql (4
> NOVEMBER
0REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1987 NOVEMBER
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
NOV. YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
LIQUOR SALES
35087.38
351642.57
390000.00
38357.43
0.90
WINE SALES
13389.46
120153.85
135000.00
14846.15
0.89
BEER SALES
44583.35
5B9053.18
635000.00
45946.82
0.93
BEER DEPOSITS
-160.72
-984.84
0.00
984.84
0.07
MISC. SALES
2989.81
37816.45
0.00
-37616.45
0.00
INTEREST
544.17
5230.42
5200.00
-30.42
1.01
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
1138.00
0.00
-1138.00
0.96
CASH DISCOUNTS
-148.98
-2114.90
0.00
2114.90
-0.19
TOTAL
96284.47
1101934.73
1165200.00
63265.27
0.95
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
6177.62
126821.75
141670.00
14848.25
0.90
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
521.92
3146.61'
4800.00
1653.39
0.66
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
586.33
25765.07
35840.00
10074.93
0.72
MISCELLANEOUS
12.00
674.00
9100.00
6426.00
0.07
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
4820.42
42500.00
37679.58
0.00
TRANSFERS
60000.00
80000.00
110000.00
30000.00
0.73
COST OF SALES
72409.06
838205.00
877000.00
38795.00
0.96
OTHER
-1225.51
6604.00
7829.51
-0.19
*TOTAL
139706.95
1078207.34
1227514.00
149.306.66
0.88
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER/FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
2352268.00
0.00
-235226B.00
0.00
WATER SALES
39962.35
485475.07
460000.00
-25475.07
1.06
WATER METER SALES
720.00
5169.70
7000.00
1830.30
0.74
REFUSE SERVICES
35128.57
320527.35
328000.00
7472.65
0.98
SEWER SERVICES
44189.19
498335.30
615000.00
116664.70
0.81
EPA SALES
37275.98
424925.46
450000.00
PENALTY CHARGES
657.32
10019.67
7000.00
-3019.67
0.00
INTEREST EARNED
32409.49
104485.33
60000.00
-44485.33
1.74
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
1793.00
6253.73
2000.00
-4253.73
0.00
OTHER
15800.00
17382.74
150.00
-17232.74
115.88
TOTAL
207935.90
4224842.35
1929150.00
-2295692.35
2.19
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER/FUND
REFUSE
32868.70
329123.40
325000.00
-4123.40
1.01
WATER
15814.02
481494.86
864040.00
402545.14
0.54
SEWER
20670.77
886875.98
688483.00
-198392.98
1.29
WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT.
1183074.51
6557093.59
0.00
-6557093.59
TOTAL
1252446.00
8254587.83
1897523.00
-6357064.83
4.35
BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME
Minutes - November - 1987
The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home
met Thursday, November 19, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. in the Annex Day Room.
President Larry Graf presiding.
Members present: Larry Graf Jim Mills
Marge Putney Mavis Geier
Ancher Nelsen
Gloria Dansereau
Members absent: David Jensen
John Mlinar
Kay Peterson
Guests: Bob Stearns - Chairman of the Burns Manor
Memorial Foundation Committee.
Mayor Paul Acklund
MINUTES OF PAST MEETING
A motion was made by Gloria Dansereau and seconded by Jim Mills
to approve the minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
A motion was made by Marge Putney and seconded by Ancher Nelsen
to approve the bills in the amount of $49,111.09. All in favor.
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL REPORT
• Financial Report was given by Mavis Geier, Administrator, due
to the absence of David Jensen. The memorial fund gifts of $500.00
from Fred and Mary Nemitz and $10.00 from Richard and Jean Peterson
were acknowledged.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Memorial Committee: Bob Stearns reviewed the activities of
the Memorial Foundation Committee. He discussed the basic plans that
had becn developed by Patch, Erickson, Madson, Watrson, Inc. in 1981.
The impact of expansion on operating costs and rate structure were
obtained by Ancher Nelsen and Bob Stearns in an interview with Maria
Gomez, Assistant Commissioner, MN. Department of Human Services. A
reappraisal of the building would be done and the rate adjusted accord-
ingly. A motion by Jim Mills to allow the committee to move forward
with the remodeling of Burns Manor. Seconded by Ancher Nelsen. All
in favor. Motion carried. Don Erickson, architect and Chuck Osell
of the state auditor office will be invited to meet with the Memorial
• Committee and Burns Manor Board, December 22, 1987.
B. Salaries: Following a discussion on salary increases for
directors of nursing and the administrator, a motion was made by
Gloria Dansereau for a 3% increase for this group. Seconded by
Marge Putney. All in favor. Motion carried.
November Minutes
Page 2
OLD BUSINESS CONT.
C. Medication Administration Program for Unlicensed Personnel: •
State law mandates a minimum of thirty-six (36) class -room instruction
hours for unlicensed personnel to administrate medications. The stu-
dents from Burns Manor were not receiving class instruction as man-
dated by law. This is in the process of being corrected.
D. Office: A motion by Ancher Nelsen and seconded by Gloria
Dansereau to relocate the beauty shop to tiie basement and business offic
to existing beauty shop according to remodeling plans of the main-
tence supervisor. Discussion. All in favor. Motion carried.
E. Low/No Useage of Sick Time: Rewarding an employee for low/
no useage of sick time will be tabled indefinitely.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Consultants Salaries: A motion by Jim Mills and seconded
by Gloria Dansereau to increase the consultants salaries 3%,
January 1, 1988. All in favor. Motion carried.
B. Certification: Certification for Title XIX for 1988 has
been received from MN. Department of Health. •
22 (Title 18/19) Skilled Nursing Beds
93 (Title 19)
14 (ICF1) Intermediate Nursing Beds
C. Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A policy of Sexual
Harassment will be developed that will adhere to the policy adapted
by the City Council.
D. Salary adjustment: A motion by Gloria Dansereau and second-
ed by Marge Putney to increase the salary $.05/hour for certified
nursing assistants that have been imployed before August 31, 1987.
All in favor. Motion carried.
E. Reemployment Rights of Armed Forces: A former employee
has been released from services under honorable condition and wishes
to be reemployed at Burns Manor. The Reemployment Rights Act was
discussed. The person was reemployed according to the provisions of
P.L. 87-391, Act of October 4, 1961.
F. Goals and Objectives: The Goals and Objectives of the
Activities department and Administration were read and discuss
PATIENT SATISFACTION forms were available for discussion.
There being no further business, President Larry Graf adjourn
.+e ""'ting.
November Minutes
Page 3
The Burns Manor Board of Directors will meet Tuesday,
. December 22, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. in the Arts & Crafts area.
ATTEST:
Larry Graf, President
•
0
Respectfully submitted:
Mavis J. Geier; Secretary
Ll
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, November 17, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas Lyke at 7:30 p.m. with
the following members present: Spencer Beytien, Marlin Torgerson, Bruce
Drahos, Roland Ebent, Bill Craig, Larry Romo and Chairman Lyke.
Also present: Building Official Jim Marks, Director of Engineering Gene
Anderson, City Administrator Gary Plotz, Fire Marshal George Field and City
Attorney Barry Anderson.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, October 20, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF SORENSEN'S ADDITION
SUBMITTED BY LARRY SORENSEN
• Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:32 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3755 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, November 59 1987. The request is for the platting of a
parcel of property to be known as Sorensen's Addition.
Discussion followed on the platting of a lot 4 which is the 188 ft.
north of the proposed plat. Because of the complication of platting
that land, the request was withdrawn by staff.
Chairman Lyke commented that he had received word from Hutch Utilities
stating that a level 6" of grade would be required and the requirement
should be placed in the subdivision agreement.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Torgerson the
hearing closed at 7:38 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend
approval of Lots 1, 2, and 3 as shown on the preliminary and final
plats with the utilities recommendation of a 6" level grade. Seconded
by Mr. Romo the motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR VARIANQE REQUESTED BY WALTER
HOMBACH, BUILDING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN, VFW.
• Chairman Lyke reopened the hearing at 7:40 p.m. with the reading of
publication 03743 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
11/17/87
Thursday, October 89 1987. The request is for a variance to allow the
VFW to provide off-street parking on property located at 247 -1st Ave.
S.E.
Mr. Day, Reflections Architectural Studio, opened by explaining that
they were at a standstill with the owners of the property between the two
lots owned by the VFW. He stated that they have negotiated on the lot
to the west and have succeeded in obtaining that property for parking.
Mr. Day commented on the fact that with this additional lot the VFW
would have 82 of the required 94 spaces and are asking for a variance
for the 14 spaces that they are lacking at this time.
Mr. Hombaeh explained that they would rather not have a lease across
the Hwy. on the Railroad property but would rather obtain their own
parking sites.
Building Official Marks sited the benefit of accessability for the
handicapped in the new facility.
Mr. Homach explained that parking area was to be all hardtop surface.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Craig the hearing closed at 7:53 P.m. Mr. Torgerson moved to
recommend approval to the city council with the stipulation that all
property acquired in the future be also parking area. Seconded by Mr. •
Homo the motion carried unanimously.
5. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF JONATHAN'S SUBD1USION SUBMITTED BY
PAUL BETKER (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval to city council with
no objection. Seconded by Mr. Drahos the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY GERRIT SMITH (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Homo made a motion to recommend approval to the city council with
no objection. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY MIKE COMMERFORD (2 MILE
RADIUS)
Mr. Romo moved to recommend approval to city council with no
objection. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROGER SIEMSON (2 MILE
RADIUS)
Mr. Beytien made a motion to recommend approval to city council with •
no objection. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously.
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
11/17/87
0(a) DISCUSSION OF SITE PLAN FOR 5 ACRES SOUTH OF ST. ANASTASIA CHURCH
PRESENTED BY REDMAN REAL ESTATE.
June Redman of Redman Real Estate, introduced Mr. Dan Koosman and
Mr. Larry Rice of Willmar MN who are developing the Beeler/Anderson
land.
Mr. Rice presented a sketch of the proposal for the property,
explaining that it would be a self-contained development. He stated
there will be 40-44 dwellings within 10 units containing 4 single family
dwellings each. There will be an amenities package including a gazebo
and swimming pool. These will be high-end rental units.
Mr. Koosman explained the proposed cul-de-sac which will be 1001 wide
to 1701 deep and elongated. The maintenance will be handled by
management with strict covenants.
Mr. Torgerson asked input from the City Engineer and Building Official
on dead ends and cul -de -saes.
City Engineer Anderson stated that there has been much interest in the
property by developers and that the city discouraged cul-de-sacs. He
stated that it cost the city more to maintain those streets.
Mr. Rice explained it would be maintained as a private street not a
. public street.
Mr. Torgerson addressed the single car garages and problems with
parking on the street but if there was a covenant it would be
addressed in that document.
Mr. Rice explained that off street parking is to a addressed.
There was much discussion on the property being a Planned Unit
Development since R-3 zoning is not advised. Mr. Ebent feels this is
a good project but there could be a problem with 4 -unit dwellings in
an R-2 district.
Mr. Romo stated there could be opposition by neighboring property
owners. He suggested educating those property owners as to the
project proposal in advance of the public hearing.
Discussion followed as to the character of the buildings and on the
ingress and egress of the property. Building Official Marka was asked
to check on the PUD or R-2 status and requirements.
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the process of application for
a Conditional Use Permit asking for a Planned Unit Development.
Discussion followed with favorable comments on the conditions of a PUD
giving more control of the development to the city.
• The consensus of the planning commission is that a PUD is the only
3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
11/17/87
feasible way of going ahead with the project. They also feel that •
the covenant should include the development always be privately
owned.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF STREET LAY -OUT SYSTEM AND NAMING AS PRESENTED BY JIM
MARKA
Building Official Marks explained the layout of the street collection
process. He stated there should be a preliminary layout according to
the comprehensive plan with some type of guideline to have a focus on
traffic.
Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend approval of the proposal by staff as
to names and numbers of the streets. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the
motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF KAMLIN VIEW SUBMITTED BY AL
KOGLIN (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend approval to city council with no
objection. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSALS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Chairman Lyke commented on the four firms that made presentations to •
the planning commission. It was the consensus of the planning
commission that the firm of BRW made the best impression. Mr. Craig
suggested calling Mr. Weber of BRW for another presentation.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to contact the firm of
BRW to update the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Hutchinson.
Seconded by Mr.' Beytien the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Torgerson also moved to recommend that city staff review the
options to be included in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of
Hutchinson and bring back to the December planning commission meeting.
Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSAL BY LARRY BETHKE FOR A CHANGE IN PUD IN
HELLAND'S 1ST ADDITION
Mr. Bethke explained the proposal of the apartments in the PUD to be
changed from 8 - 8 unit apartments to 4 - 16 unit apartments. He
stated that the apartment would not exceed 2 stories.
Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend approval of the change in the PUD.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
•
u
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
11/17/87
. 7. ADJOURMENT
There being no father business the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
•
•
5
1988 Bingo License
** Elks Lodge
1988 Gamblina Devices License
** American Legion Auxiliary
American Legion
** Elks Codge
Gopher Campfire
** Hutch Baseball Assoc.
** Hutch Hockey Assoc.
** Lions Club
VFW (will be in Monday, Dec. 21)
• '7FY1'CQ6tt25
Hutchinson Jaycees 1. O'ToolGoldCoin
2. Tooles
** Have not responded with an application as of December 18, 1987.
0
•
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE• December 21, 1987
TO: Hutchinson City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Bonnie Baumetz
------------------------------
SUBJECT• Gambling License Renewals
------------------------------
The following gambling license renewals have been approved by
Ron Kirchoff:
Y.F.W.
Gopher Campfire Club (Victorian Inn)
American Legion Post 96
Hutch Jaycees 1. Gold Coin
2. O'Toole's Pub
0
•
s
*Peter 8rynildson
K. E. Aus, Mgr.
*Charles Boettcher
Curt Bradford
Miriam Rahn
*John A. Buytaert
*Wallace Pettit, Pres.
City of Hutchinson
Michael J. Comerford
Michael J. Comnerford
Jean C. Davison
Barbara Flom
Carol Fransen
Dennis Hanson
Edward Harper
Ward Haugen
R. C. Hornick
Don Erickson
Eric Johnson
Walter L. Kelley
Ralph Kerr
David Kramer
*Orville V. Lambert
Brad Larson
+William C. Leung
Charles Nelson, Mgr.
Glen Bloomer
Mark J. Peterson
Scott Plowman
* Brian L. Reckow, Mgr.
Emil C. Rix
Cliff Roiger, Mgr.
Bruce Santelman
Mark J. Peterson
**Clayton Shoutz
*Manager
George M. Thelen
Thomas Williamson
Keith Weber
*Joseph Wesley
Tom Paque
Myron E. Wigen, Jr.
Don Wetter (St. Cloud)
Peter Adams
Vern Showalter
POPCORN STAND PERMIT:
Mark D. Mc raw
1988 CIGARETTE LICENSES
Tefer s
K Mart Corporation
The Big C
Prairie House, Inc.
7 West Inc.
J's Pizza Garten
Tom Thumb Food Market
City Hall
Mike's Mobil Service
Southtown Mobil
Davison North Side Grocery
Elks Lodge No. 2427
Carol's Cafe
The Sheep Shedde
West Side Grocery
Carquest Auto Parts Inc.
One Stop Gas & Grocery
Red Owl
County Market
Hutch Cafe
V.F.W. Post #906
Coast to Coast
Lambert's Standard Service
Little Crow Bowling Lanes Inc,
Gold Coin Chinese Restaurant
Hutch. Mun. Liquor Store
3M Magnetic Media
Erickson's Oil Products
Plowman's
Crow River Country Club
Downtown Standard
American Legion Post 96
Country Kitchen
Erickson Oil Products
7 -West Wash & Dry
Happy Chef
George's Food -N -Fuel
More 4
3M Tape Plant
Wesley's Pharmacy
Shopko
Wigen Chevrolet
Cash Wise Foods
Sodbuster Saloon
Papa Vern's Neighborhood Grill
Popcorn Stand
S.W. Corner of
**Mailing Address: Rt. 2, Box 51, Dassel,
Cash Wise Foods - Hutchinson
Coborn's Inc.
Mr. Don Wetter,
P.O. Box 6146
1455 E. Hwy. 23
St. Cloud, MN
Exec. Y.P.
56302
101 1st Ave. S.E.
1090 Hwy. 15 S.
204 4th Ave. N.W.
Hwy. 15 S.
Hwy. 7 West
16 Main St. N.
1115 Hwy. 7 West
37 Washington Ave. W.
105 Main St. N.
903 Hwy. 15 S.
578 Prospect
225 Washington E.
40 Main St. N.
Hwy. 7 East
502 Harrington St.
107 1st Ave. N.E.
4th Ave. NW & N. Main
242 Main St. S.
1105 Plaza 15
122 Main St. S.
247 1st Ave. S.E.
105 E. Washington
N. Main & 4th N.E.
Hwy. 7 West
45 Main St. N.
117 Main St. N.
Hwy. 22 S.
1100 Hwy. 15 S.
Hwy. 7 West
Box 9
104 Main St. N.
35 2nd Ave. S.
Hwy. 7 East
11 4th Ave. N.E.
Hwy. 7 West
Hwy. 7 West
600 Adams S.
140 1st Ave. S.E.
Hwy. 22 S.
34 Main St. S.
1065 Plaza 15 S.
Hwy. 7 East
S. Hwy. 15
18 Main N
Hwy 7 W.
831 2nd Ave. S.W.
Public Square
MN 55325 (No delivery at business)
* Have not responded with an application.as of December 18, 1987. /,
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1987
• PUBLICATION N0. 3765
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON 1988 SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
APPLICATION FOR FUNDING
Mainstreet And Uptown Rehabilitation Program
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
To Whom It May Concern:
Notice is hereby given that the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota will be
conducting a public hearing on Tuesday, December 22, 1987 at 8:00 P.M. in
the Council Chambers located in the City Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West,
Hutchinson, Minnesota.
• The purpose of the public hearing is to review the proposed Small Cities
Development Program Mainstreet and Uptown Rehabilitation Program on file for
public inspection in the office of the City Administrator, City Hall, and the
office of the Hutchinson Community Development Corporation, 45 Washington
Avenue East, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350, and to solicit public comment on
the program prior to submission to the Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development for funding approval.
RJ
Gary D. Tlotz
City Administrator
0
.a 0
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DETERMINING THE
PROJECT AREA AS MEETING THE
"SLUM & BLIGHT" DEFINITION
WHEREAS; the area bounded by the river on the north, Fourth Avenue South on the south, the
west side of Hessen Street on the east, and the east side of Franklin Street on the west in the
Central Business District all a part of a previously designated Redevelopment District persuient
to M.S. 273.73 Sub. 10, shall be the "Project Area".
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED; that the City of Hutchinson hes assessed and evaluated the
buildings in the "Project Area" and found them to be i n a deteriorating condition by reason of
dilapidation, obsolescence, faulty arrangement or design, overcrowding, lack of ventilation,
under or over heating of building, electrical and plumbing in disrepair, structural deficiencies
in the exterior envelope, poor energy efficiency and handicap excessability. Serious
deterioration of buildings will require extensive: cleaning, painting, mortar & masonry repair
and patching, stabilization of foundation, restore architectural features, roof and well
insulation, roof repair and rain leaders, replace single pan windows with energy units, furnace
& air conditioner repair and update, calk and repair windows where appropriate, improve rear
building access to code, sprinkling building for fire protection, upgrade antiquated plumbing and
electrical, energy doors, awnings, removal of non -original materials, inside layout to take
advantage of restored buildings. Due to corrosion and erosion new water entrances and entrances
to supply adequate water for fire protection to meet life safety code is required.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; the condition do exist in the "Project Area" as descri bed in
M.S. 273.73, Sub. 10.
"Redevelopment district" mean a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a
project, or portion of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one of the
following condition reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists:
70 Percent of the parcels in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other
improvements and 20 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard and an additional 30
percent of the buildings are found to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to
remove such existing condition as: inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use
relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete
buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion, or other indentified hazards to the health,
safety and general well being of the community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; the City of Hutchinson proposed to provide rehabilitation assistance
via the Main Street and Uptown Rehabilitation Program in the "Project Area" Using public and
private sector findings.
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED based on the content of M.S. 273.73, Sub 10 and the deficiencies
listed above, the City of Hutchinson finds the "Project Area" is a "Sl um & Blight" area.
0
IJ
TRADE
DEPARTMENT OF XAWt ;4 AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Division of Community Development
9th Floor, American Center Building es
150 East Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55101
Small Cities Development Program (SCOP)
The Small Cities Development Program is the state -administered portion of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community Development Block Grant
program. The SCDP, as administered by the Minnesota Department of Energy and
Economic Development, is a competitive program designed to develop viable small cities
by providing decent housing and suitable living environment and expanding economic
opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate -income.
Who is Eligible to Apply
Small Cities Development Program grants are available to all smaller general purpose
local units of government. In the context of this grant program, "small" is defined as
cities and towns with populations under 50,000 and counties with populations under
200,000. Indian tribal governments, which can receive funds directly from HUD, are
ineligible for this program.
How Can the Program be Used? 0
The program is designed to address a broad range of community development needs.
State program rules subdivide the available grant funds into three general categories.
Those categories are:
1. Housing Grants. Typically, SCOP funds are granted to a local government, who, in
turn, establishes a revolving loan fund for the purpose of rehabilitating the local
housing stock. Loans may be made for owner -occupied housing, rental housing,
single-family, or multiple -family housing. Loan agreements may be established to
allow for deferred payments or immediate monthly payments. Interest rates may
vary. In all cases, housing projects are directed to low- and moderate -income
persons.
2. Public Facilities Grants. The public facilities category covers a very broad range
of community development activities. Under the public facility category, grants
have been awarded for sewage treatment and disposal, including collection systems
and treatment plants; water systems, including wells, water towers, and distribution
systems; storm sewer projects; street projects; fire halls; and senior centers.
3. Comprehensive Grants. As the name suggests, comprehensive projects frequently
involve both housing and public facility components. In addition, comprehensive
projects may include an economic development component, which consists of loans
from the grant recipient to businesses for building construction/renovation,
purchase of equipment, or working capital.
When to Apply
An annual application cycle has been established, whereby all eligible applicants are
simultaneously notified of grant availability and are invited to submit an application by
a prescribed deadline, usually the end of January.
Minimum Requirements
In order to be considered for funding, an applicant must meet one of three federal
objectives. Those objectives are:
1. Benefit to low- and moderate -income persons;
2. Elimination of slum and blight; or
3. Elimination of threats to public health or safety.
In addition, an application must be for an eligible activity; project costs must be
reasonable; and the general public must be involved in the application preparation.
Rating
Applications are rated by SCDP staff according to criteria established for the program
and published in the "State Register." All applications receive a numerical rating and
grants are offered based on the final scores.
How to Get Started
First, you need to develop your community development pians and decide if your
community needs outside financial assistance. Next, contact the Department of Energy
and Economic Development's Community Development Division at (612) 296-5005. SCDP
staff will answer your questions, provide you with program -related manuals and
application forms, and direct you to available resources that can help you prepare an
application.
Further Notes
Because the SCOP is a competitive program, it is very important to put together a
thorough and thoughtful application. The success of an application is dependent on the
extent of the community development needs, how well those needs are identified, and
the extent to which the infusion of SCDP funds will meet the needs. Before preparing
an application, please discuss your ideas with the SCDP staff. This brief exercise
could save you valuable time and effort.
/pb
F VI/5-CP
SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (SCOP)
POTENTIAL SOME$ Am USES
TO REHABILITATE TARGETED AREA OF MAIN STREET
PROJECT COST $QURCES TE FUNDS
,pR1YAtE
1. t ttlity use: Webr Subject to
ontronea to all bulldinp A! "Mon by City Council
ani lata to "Project Ares' $717,000 $220,000 (water fund)
Sprinktlnd all bsesments 203,000 194,000 (Revolving Fund)
2. Hutch Hotel
Rshsb 2nd & 3rd floor for
LOW& modsrab Income housing 625,000
& RoMb 2nd floor uptown.spertneMa
IS spertmsnts 1$7,500 a 112,500
4 Commercial Rehab
2S bulldinpe o $20,000 m 500,000
Administration Expense 500000
Project Director 650000
$2,272,500
$414,000
312,500
47,812
212,500
$572,812
0
312,500
64,688
287,500
$0,000
00
$1,285,688
J
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MAINSTREET REHAB GRANT & LOAN PROGRAM
DEIGN OUIDELINES
• The purpose of the City of Hutchi neon's Melastreet Rehab GrantA Una Program is to encourage
preservation and beautification of uptown builds no3 bu enhancino their original characteristics
through restorative improvements to the exterior facade Each project seeking finenical
assistance through this Program will be reviewed according to Design Guldeli nes set forth
herein. Review will be done by the City Building Official, Moinstrest Design Review Committee
and Development Director.
I. RENTAL HOUSING REHABILITATION
A. Rehabilitation guidelines for apartments will generally follow the guidelines a
described herein for the commercial rehab.
B. Rehabilitation should include life safety and building code, plumbing, electrical,
energy related improvements, heating, security, handicap consideration, at.
11. EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS EMPHASIS AND BUILDING PRESERVATION
A. Exterior Emphasis
Exterior facade improvement should include mosonrycleening or painting, window
repair or replacement, entryvey remodeling, signage, removal of non -original
materials such as al uminum sheeting, and restoration of the building's original
appearance. In addition, project cost may then be used to reinforce structural stability
and/or waterproof integrity of the roof, walls, floors, and ceilings. To the extent
possible, such reinforcement should be concealed so as not to detract from building's
appearance.
B. Preserving Original Building Character
Maintain the original form, integrity, historic character, and distinguishing
materials of a building or site. Avoid alterations which have no historical basis
and seek to recreate an earlier era, or, which promote a stylistic cliche, such as
rustic, 'Western,' 'Colonial,' etc. Also avoid visual impact on facades by air
conditioners, vents, etc.
When ropointing mortar joints, duplicate existing mortar in composition, color,
texture, joint size, tooling pattern, and joint profile as much as possible. High time
mortar, for example, is often appropriate for late 19th century downtown buildings.
Repair rather than replace deteriorated architectural features whenever possible.
If replacement is necessary, match the new material in composition, design, color,
texture, etc. to the original material. Base repair or replacement of missing archi-
tectural features on historically accurate duplications.
C. Surface Cleaning and Painting
L
No stodhla bog. Im", use milder treatments, such a slow water wahiag, low
graowr waler vaMP4, or slam 6%Waq.
Use paint to preserve Soft brick or if surface cleaning will otherwise damage the
building Use appropriate surface prep--iratt�A to Dond the masonry and paint.
D. Building Color
the emonal catorino or select subdued colors -- subdued reds, brawna, tiled •
yellows, grays.
Suggested Color Theme:
1) body color for exterior wail surfaces
2) a second color to highlight the u ; ,: si columns or barna of the storefront, and,
the same or similar color for frames and trim outlining openings and panels.
3) accent colors for special details such as stamped and relieve rosettes, cornice
or am details, medallions, and perhaps the front door.
DOORS, WIND0YY5- AND DISPLAY AREAS
A. Entrance
Restore origi nal proportions and design to entryway and door. Use appropriately
sized and designed solid hardwood doors or insulated steel doors rather then standard
issue aluminum.
Whenever possible, provide for handicapped access with sloped welk to the entrance
rather then steps and a door that is easy to open.
B. Windows & Window Display Arps
When possible, design window display ares to allow daylight to penetrate i nto the
shop and to allow a view to the interior from the street.
Use incandescent spotlighting rather than fluorescent (which gives a harsh, cold
effect) for display and storefront lighting.
Situate signboards in a specifically designated spot above the transoms (check old
photos), between the storefront and the upper story. As a general rule, use a sign-
board not more than two feet high and lettering between 6 and 15 inches in height
with 6098 of the signboard devotedto lettering. Plastic is generally undesirable
for lettering.
For sign lighting, use smell incandescent (non- NO no) spotlighting rather than
back -lighted plastic bubble signs.
For awnings, use canvas that is either retractable or stationary. Awning color
should coordinate with building color, evoidi ng glossy or loud patterns.
9
0
C17Y Of HUTCHINSON
MAINSTREET REHAB GRANT & LOAN PROGRAM
PROGRAM GUIDELINES
The Mainstreet Rehab Grant & Loan Program created by the City of Hutchineen for the Uptown
Central Business District is intended to encourage the preservation and beautification of our
uptown buildings by enhancing their original character in order to create a more attractive,
i mriti ng uptown shopping envi ronment.
Applications are available at the Hutchinson Community Development Corporation (HCDC)
office at 45 Washington Ave. E.
Below are guidelines for program participation.
------------------------------------------------------------------
WHO CAN APPLY?
Any owner or tenant manager (with owner
consent) of an uptown commercial building.
HOW MUCH GRANT & LOAN MONEY COULD
i APPLY FOR?
Commercial Rehabilitation - Financial
Formula based on a project cost of up to
=50,000.00. Based on the program guideli nos
the Design Committee may approve a larger
sum on corner lots and on buildings covering
more then the equivalent of one city lot.
Rental Housing Rehabilitation - Financial
Formula based on a housing fund cost of up to
Si 5,000.00/apartment unit.
Construction dollars used to add area may
be considered as private fi nencing under the
formulas for repayment terms.
(Sea formulas as set forth in the section
entitled WHAT ARE THE REPAYMENT TERMS)
WHAT REHAB EXPENSES COULD BE PAID
WITH GRANT & LOAN MONEY?
1. Construction material.
2. Labor ( but not owner, applicant, or
employee labor) at the Federal Prevailing
Wage Schedule.
3. Architect or engineer fees.,
4. Building permit.
Any work that improves the exterior appear -
awe ofthe building - restoring, replacing
or repairing its original materials or
architectural features.
I addition, work may include:
1. Improvements to the structural stability
and waterproof i ntegrity of the roof, wells,
floors, and ceilings.
2. Remodeling wordingtoDosignGuidelina
masonry cleaning, repainting, patching;
energy- related i mprovements such as
insulation, thermal pane windows, weather
stripping; appearance relatedimprovs-
ments such as new wni rgs, doors,
windows, frames, repainting; etc.
3. Life Safety Code improvements on 13t and
2nd floors.
4. Removal and replacement of non -
original materials and architectural
features in order to facilitate restoration
of the building's original appearance or
remodeling in conformance with Design
Guidelines.
5. Costs associated with making connector
corridors between buildings for customer
convenience shoppi ng and or mini - mall
concept.
WHAT EXPENSES WOULD HUT BE ELIGIBLE?
`�- i;. Remodeling for rear entrance.
i. Exaatingd0t refinand%,worktngcapitai,
or Iffie 1.
2. Acquisition.
3 Work involving movable furniture or
fixtures not allowed under IRS regulations to oe aepreciated
WHAT ARE THE REPAYMENT TERMS?
Deferred loan - become grant if property is held by same I s%
owner for six or more years.
IF SOLD WITHIN:
REPAYMENT OF GRANT PORTION
0 - 3 YEARS
100%
4th YEAR
7556
5th YEAR
50%
6th YEAR
25%
HELD OVER 6 YEARS
NO REPAYMENT
20 year loon at 0% i nterest 42.5%
Private financing (below market interest will be available) 42.51
1009
VITIA0.11IF1221VA11. ; qlm%, 71110A lil::N111U1:11KAI iNGI
i
1.Meet with the Community Development
Director to discuss project, get ap-
plication form and a copy of the Program
Rules and Design Guidelines.The Mai nstreet
Design & Review Committee an assist the
applicant in preparing a preiimibory plan,
identifying the original building materials
or architectural features for renovation,
preparing a preliminary statement of
work to be done and estimating 1k_
Proximate project est. (The ap-
plicant should have final plans, spec-
ifications, and costs prepared pro-
feasionelly, however.)
The City Building Official will inspect
the building to insure that it is struc-
turally sound and that the proposed im-
provement will be a cat effective in-
vestment. He will also identify any life -
safety code violations needing correction.
3. The Building Official, Community De-
velopment Director, and Design Review
Committee will review project drawings,
plans, and specifications. They -rill re-
commend approval or state conditions
required for approval, in writing, to
the applicant.
WHAT CRITERIA WILL BE USED TO REVIEW
MY APPLICATION?
t. CKhrlllucstriUi bawflgiaMOMiMM
Cade.
2 Extent to which project would enhance
appearance of the buildi nq and uptown
1. Preliminery drawiaga and specifications
includingexterior elevations, first floor
plan changes and specification narritive
addressing design guideline requirements.
2. Signature of building owner beside 'Owner
Consent Statement' on application if ap-
plicant is not the owner.
3. Application forma
NO REHABILITATION MAY BE STARTED UNTI l
GRANT DOLLARS ARE MADE AVAILABLE
(Approximately Sept. 1, 19ea)ORTHAT
PART OF THE PROJECT WILL BE INELIGIBLE
FOR FUNDING.
WHEN WILL THE GRANT & LOAN MONEY
BE PAID OUT?
1. Grant will be submitted to $tete on
Jen 29, 1988.
2. if approved by state, notice will be given
approximately ray 1, 1988.
3. Grant start up time, an additional 90 -
120 days.
4. Grant monies will be available
approximately Sept. 1, 1988.
C-1
*II
CITY Of HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
MAINSTREET REHAB GRANT & LOAN APPLICATION
GEYERAL IYFORMATION
i
1. Applicant:
(Name)
2. Property Owner:
3. Site:
( Address)
(Meme) (Address)
(Business Hame)
e a
DATE
(Address)
1. The rehabilitation will include (check es many es apply):
(Phone !)
(Phone 0)
Cledning of building
_ Painhave(building.
Work on facade, such es mortar rapai r, restoration or replacement of architectural
features, etc.
Facade work will include: — Front Facede _ Rear facade _. Both
_ Work on the entryway, to i nclude: _ front Entry — Rear Entry _Both
so
_ Work on display windows and/or window display arses.
Signage chews.
— Awning installation or renovation. Awningvnll be: —Retractable
.Stationary
_ Reinforcemeat of structural stability of roof, walls, floors, or ceilings. Please
explain:
_ Other. Plessedescnbe:
2. Please indicate the contractor (s) who will be doing the work:
Please attach: Copy of specifications, plan or drawings for the work, including cost Quotes
• for materials, labor, architectural fees, building permits, etc.
Esti mated protect cost: S
Amount Bloated to interior improvements, e.g. structural work on roof, wells, floor,
etc.: S
Grant &Lan amount applying for: $
I hereby affirm that ell information above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
I have read and agree to abide by City of Hutchinson Mainstreet Rehab Grant & Loan Program
Guidelines and the Program's Design Guidelines.
Signature Dote
BUILDING OWNER CONSENT (If OWNER IS NOT APPLICANT)
I, , owner of the property mentioned
in this application, have reviewed the proposed project with the applicant and consent to hove
the work done as proposed. In addition, l agree to sign the Repayment Agreement with respect to
this project.
Signature
Date
W
0,
01 RESOLUTION
Publication Number
WHEREAS, the Community of Hutchinson has a need and desire to
rehabilitate the central business district, and, WHEREAS, the
appearance and design of downtown buildings is important to any
rehabilitation effort in the Community of Hutchinson, and,
WHEREAS, a committee with authority to offer non-binding recom-
mendations regarding design and appearance would be helpful in pro-
viding uniformity and establishing a unified theme throughout the
central business district of the City of Hutchinson;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson does
hereby authorize the creation of the main street design review com-
mittee to be composed of representatives of merchants, building
owners and municipal building officials for the purpose of reviewing
and approving construction and building rehabilitation in the
central business district. The committee shall have the authority
to review the proposed rehabilitation and design of buildings .
located within the central business district but shall act in an
advisory capacity only and shall have no authority to alter the
plans and specifications. Committee review shall be for the purpose
of determining whether or not the proposed improvement is consistent
with the overall goals of the City of Hutchinson in the long-term
development of the central business district. The committee's
geographical responsibilities shall be limited to the area between
Fourth Avenue South and the Crow River and between Hassen Street and
Franklin Street but in any event shall not include area beyond Tax
Increment Districts I and II.
Paul L. Ackland
Attest:
Gary Plotz
Meeting with Presidents of Four Finanical Institutions
September 17, 1987
7:30 AM, Victorian Inn
T.A. (Buzz) B rich
M.W. Wise
Don 6106
Lowell Wakefield
.John Bernhagen
The four agreed to cooperate in financing of downtown renovation
projects.
1. Below market rate financing on qualifying projects.
2. Would went individuals to use their own financing first where possible.
3. Because of bank examiners requirements, guarantees would be needed
to support bank low interest lows.
4. They want a commitment from borrowers to revitilize end work
toward cooperative effort to obtain favorable terms on loans.
5. Would consider giving =2500/institution towards a Min Street
coordinator program for three years.
6. If loan guarantees can be established they would be willing to consider
loaning money to qualified borrowers, using city deposits now
receiving approximately 5X interest, for 72 and turning those proceeds
(22) over to the Main Street coordinator program.
0
0
ff
12)587.5!51
TY OF HUTCHINSON
ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
rn: MINN 55350
M E M O
DATE: November 25, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Downtown water Distribution Project
As was recently presented to the Council by the Executive Director of the
Hutchinson Community Development Corporation, in conjunction with the
downtown revitalization project, we recommend that water service pipes to
all buildings be replaced, due to the corrosion and erosion problems
experienced on Main Street in the past ten years. A portion of the project
cost could be funded through a Small Cities Development Program Grant and
the balance by the Nater Fund, assessments and/or the improvement bond.
A preliminary plan and cost estimate has been prepared for installation of
new water services to buildings within the project area which is bounded by
the river on the north, Fourth Avenue South on the south, the west side of
Hassan Street on the east, and the east side of Franklin Street on the
west. The goal of the plan is to install sprinkler services to all buildings
not presently served thusly and whose basements are larger than 1500 square
feet, as required by the Life Safety Code, a portion of which is attached.
However, the scope of the plan was enlarged to provide sprinkler service to
all buildings and buildable sites in the project area, thereby foregoing the
potential need to excavate Main Street in the future to do so.
J
costs were determined for installation of 4" water services from the main in
the street to the building. Services would generally be installed side-by-side,
within three or four feet of each other, and would approach buildings thusly in
cairs in line with the common wall of the buildings. Near the buildings the
services would be redirected so that one pipe would be installed to one building
and the other pipe to the adjacent building. The 4" service would function as
a sprinkler service. A connection would be made to the sprinkler service just
outside of the building and a shut-off provided for the domestic water service.
Both service pipes would be installed through the foundation wall or into the
basement, as the case may be, for connection by t^e property owner. A waiver
of tresspass or similar document will be needed fror. each owner to allow
installation into the building. it is unlikel: t.. -:at the point of service thus
provided will mated the existing point if ser.,ice, so it can be assumed that
at the very least, the domestic water service will need tc be reconnected inside
^e building. Exhibits "A" through "D" show the pro used installations in the
street. one disadvantage of installing services in the street is the disruption
of traffic. An advantage to this method of installation is that the sidewalk
will be maintained for pedestrian traffic the majority of the time.
Downtown Water Distribution Project
November 25, 1967
Page 2
Costs were also determined for installing water mins in the sidewalk on both
sides of the street, cross connecting those mains to the Main Street water main
with services installed to buildings and buildable sites as described above.
Exhibits "E" throuch "G" show the proposed installations in the sidewalk. An
advantage of installing the mains in the sidewalk area is that vehicular traffic
can be maintained for the majority of the project duration, albeit one lane in
each direction, which will increase congestion problems. Some disadvantages of
this alternative are disruption to pedestrian traffic for lengthy periods of
time, and increase water main footage with associated maintenance, while the
Main Street water main exists nearby.
Accompanying is a cost estimate for each alternative, and for a combination of
the two alternatives, which includes the least cost of each. Also, included is
the estimated cost for installing water mains on certain side streets contiguous
to Main Street. Those streets are Second Avenue North from Hassan Street to
Franklin Street, Franklin Street from First Avenue Northwest to Second Avenue
Northwest, Washington Avenue from Main Street to Franklin Street, Second Avenue
Southwest from Main Street to Franklin Street, and Third Avenue Southeast from
Hassan Street to Main Street. In addition to providing sprinkler service to
establishments for system looping, thereby enhancing reliability of the
distribution system. All estimated costs include 221 for City expenses.
There have been discussions in the past of removing the sidewalks along Main
Street as part of the revitalization improvement and constructing decorative
sidewalk, such as with paving brick or granite slabs, or of providing an
exposed aggregate surface. If that were to occur, the sidewalk replacement may
be totally grant eligible, in which case the estimated water main cost could be
reduced as follows:
Estimated Total Sewer and Water Cost
Less Estimated Sidewalk Reconstruction Cost
Estimated Net Sewer and Water Cost
Combination of
Street and
Under Sidewalk Sidewalk
$ 798,200 $ 717,400
S 59,900 $ 24,400
S 738,300 S 693,000
Presentiv, a number of buildings fronting on Main Street are served from the water
main in the alley west of Main Street. We recommend that in conjunction with Main
Street revitalization and improvement project, those buildings be reconnected to
services that will be provided from the Main Street water main or from a side
street main, as t:^.e case may be. In so doing, the City would be able to ultimatei::
abandon the alle-, water mains.
wins in t^e alleys cresent problems from the standpoint of maintenance and main
sr ser%ice freeze -ups. These problems are magnified in the Central Business
:.strict Where cam mains, telephone cables, and electrical conductors. are alread_:
cressn.' in t-._ alley, making an,, need for maintenance excavation diffic:it.
'nsta a atic:. of new mains in the allevs is not recommended for the same reason=_,
and because the proximity of building on either side or both:^ sides of the alleys
confine available working space and the buildings themselves or their foundstioos
could sustain damage during construction.
Downtown Water Distribution Project
November 25, 1987
?ace 3
Dix block of sanitary sewer must be reconstructed or rehabilitated. The sewer
is on plain Street from Second Avenue North to the river. Costs incurred are
evidently not eligible for grant funding.
An estimate of cost for sprinkling only the basement of the building in the
project area is attached. A cost near the lower estimated figure could be
expected if all of the owners hired one contractor, or possibly two or three,
to do the work. On the other hand, if each owner hired a different contractor,
the cost would likely be near the higher figure.
The downtown water main improvement project could be completed in 1989.
Suggested sources of funding are the small cities grant assuming the City's
application is accepted, the water fund, the revolving loan fund, and the
improvement bond.
Respectfully submitted,
Eugen Anderson
Director of Engineering
EA/pv
attachments
cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
James Narks, Building Official
George F. Field, Fire Marshal
Randy DeVries, Dir. Water/Wastewater Operations
Dick Nagy, Water Systems Supervisor
John Bernhagen
0
ESTIMATED WATER MAIN AND SERVICE COST ON MAIN STREET
FROM THE RIVER TO 4TH AVM1UE SOUTH
Bridge to 2nd Avenue North
2nd Avenue No. to 1st Avenue No.
1st Avenue No. to Washington A!lnue
Washington Avenue to 1st Arenue So.
1st Avenue So. to 2nd Avenue So.
2nd Avenue So. to 3rd Avenue So.
3rd Avenue So. to 4th Avenue So.
Estimated Sanitary Sewer Cost on Main
Street from the River to 2nd Avenue North
In Street In Sidewalk
In Street and
in Sidewalk
Combination
$ 27,100 $
27,1061)$
27,100
52,000
117,100
52,000
172,900
147,300
147,300
65,500
52,200
52,200
132,000
143,000
132,000
37,600
42,30Q1)
37,600
18,100
18,1088
18,100
$ 505,200 $ 547,100 $ 466,300
ESTIMATED WATER MAIN AND SERVICE COST ON CONTIGUOUS
SIDE STREETS
8" Loop 2nd Ave. No. -Hassan to Franklin & 1st Ave. No.
1st Ave. No. -Franklin to Main St.
1st Ave. No. -Main to Hassan St.
Washington Ave. -Franklin to Main St.
Washington Ave. -Main to Hassan St.
1st Ave. So. (Nemitz Paint)
2nd Ave. So. -Main to Hassan St.
2nd Ave. So. -Main to Franklin St.
3rd Ave. So. -Main to Hassan St.
$ 25,000
$ 60,1062)
16,800
19,30 40,700
4,800
3,400
4,5092)
48,4
28,100
$ 226,100
main Street Water Main
S 505,200 $
547,100 S
466,300
Main Street Sanitary Sewer
25,000
25,000
25,OOC
Side Street Water Main
226,100
226,100
226,10C
Estimated Total Cost
S 756,300 S
798,200 $
717,400
Estimated Cost for 91 Service Items OnI.. S 322,800 S 157,000 S 242,30C
Vote: All costs include 22% for Citv Errense.
(1) Cost snown is for service installaticn to watermain in the street.
(2) According to present policy, the sajority is City Cost, approximately $140,000
tectal.
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGE AND HIGH/LOW COST FIGURES
`ic. 313cS.
(Basemen,:'
91,075
$ 45,629
$
Over 1500 S.F.
No. Less Than
Total
51,961
Basement
(Basement)
1500 S.F.
Bldgs.
Block
Square Footage
$ 3,840
$
11
(1)
13
8
43,434
11
(1)
12
12
34,118
9
11
13
24,094
2
6
27
6,351
1
4
28
24,552
1
7
42
2,560
8
(3)
15
49
27,334
7
(4)
15
50
18,392
0
0
31
-
03
32
-
50
86
180,835
0
Low+ Cost High Cost)
$ 87,800
$
91,075
$ 45,629
$
68,442
$ 36,141
$
51,961
$ 9,526
$
14,289
$ 24,552
$
36,828
$ 3,840
$
5,760
$ 28,975
$
43,462
$ 25,124
$
37,686
$ 261,587 $ 349,503
If work is done under one contract, it could be possible to get a low cost of $177,761 and
a high cost of $266,641.
Cal
SECOND AVENUE N
t'0 7 O �tw
W*.. .
`
I
hr•Iq..
C.Wy
_
i O,Ni.
I
I
'—
II
S..r.
I
R
!- R113
�
I
�
31
ri.
1.
StoddardI
NII
L
G.T.C.
I
t
ISO
R. IINr..
j
1'
�iiij
Sa.n
t
�1
rF
.1
I
,
R S T ��._,*x"VF1mr"`
does, comm, -- --if
ON
�
e
O+il.
T... •
I,
1
P 1 U •
.01. .pl.
come,., ..,.
t'0 7 O �tw
W*.. .
P 1
' Mgat0 wHlUtp. it �vi, L14-
.
r.ua
c.o.tT j
s.be'.
e1.11a!
B
•afrow
e.+ selp —
'�►/4#00
P
!
I
P
fee
_I
W
the
t.
lu
.
010. Is
tIa"**
I
Ci;ie
rvryL Visits GNU
96
NO
NO
!solo.
efrlT .
11. Jose"
C•ristT'.
Joy visa.
...n4lq
c..f U
Moe. B.a../
8 I
' r',�..
Noblesse
so
Me.1.M1
I
a
f l
111
M�
'
l .Iles
Iwamoto
'
'' L
s
ruIUBU Lip«
40
��
Star
sordes
store
'
' (star-
B. sell)
WA's
DN•IeV.R
sre.NN
bit Y o
ea=
P.T.C. ie
teNit
l.ei
' 47.ra1
WASHINGTON
r
!
ITe•. •Mile
Cmawv
' f
RI. Col. ..T.
hre id/
Cos"
Creams '
Vest Gstret servi?
witevil
ttenelul .wx«T
a
..f� !�
Tit:
Crew . w Cable
• L—
T.. ss. o.« p
!ryY lT.eY !NU j •Ll
'aw••e cosh_
j I % r.
DNHf: i f Co.
Per afl.re
tea ler H•. seal I • � �--_
i +r• s ea. s�
AVENUE I�c y800 ilii l
f
Ci;ie
rvryL Visits GNU
96
Grl"i.is
40t shoe
!solo.
efrlT .
11. Jose"
C•ristT'.
Joy visa.
...n4lq
c..f U
Moe. B.a../
•Nen.•
Bolter sass
-�. lar$•__"
WASHINGTON
r
!
ITe•. •Mile
Cmawv
' f
RI. Col. ..T.
hre id/
Cos"
Creams '
Vest Gstret servi?
witevil
ttenelul .wx«T
a
..f� !�
Tit:
Crew . w Cable
• L—
T.. ss. o.« p
!ryY lT.eY !NU j •Ll
'aw••e cosh_
j I % r.
DNHf: i f Co.
Per afl.re
tea ler H•. seal I • � �--_
i +r• s ea. s�
AVENUE I�c y800 ilii l
f
a
CI9T 0011 ►.11s.
$0611..
./ ye, I**
WASHINGTON
Matta
..11
o16.I.Ns "glob NNN
Load., ha V"s..V•ca
W
st , s» a0
9Nokr.i f/11i10
N9yf.6s 911.91
01./11
Wesley's Dreg
P r.N.
7.uioi
9,699 i
FIR;
i
��•!
'T.. ffN
T6MU.
�
i
r
�i r
_�■
��
1
46
9.M.h
TB. brfN9►;oN
AVENUE
411118640 Book '
klrld'6 .
'I
F—jp.,o% Core
i
I
lop ossify ' Call, S
.vr• ■swlal„
ro• . Trove
vnlole $&o.
f 0460..
J..sir
IR Mares v,"',
•066•
SEFONt�Y•e
N.
L.
CC
lot porkplaso
Spr•nrc4d '��
ftiorem
1.11r9N ■ I
161.1108
1 I
N1H r �
1.060
51
. , Er;
$s.•, 1Cr
S A" 3r10, $felly,
hl.. 1
r Y,"c stile
ammor goes _N. � mosim, 6ommus slop. sees, Amm .1.n,
AVENUE
S c
1= —
(i Iads ilfe
I 11. f ••u.• Well"
Ilew.elt Ledge
SECOND
.....� gM ir•..11.
•.erre � _ .
I .rte
safe., o.,t
II
J great ete.•
Z)
Q
gee
out
1 ',
Us
I
hgnBN
f 1 • gree• *bko"
nate I
,� I w•a � I �I� i
0.•el
AVENUE '� 80U
I�
O' I IIe H.HeM I I
ii
�1 P
I
Zf;ZF '
'
M^•at(MM Q
IL •rises•. I l�
— notable Ne ie.eHl U)
_
••Llan Q
o L.•.
LegiM f I
� ►eef OHise '
Century 21
falser
orAI#*
F•U■ Lager•.
Cg.rat Partial
C„1.LJ-"T_'
,I
1
li
i gnat
II
Century 21
falser
orAI#*
F•U■ Lager•.
Cg.rat Partial
C„1.LJ-"T_'
Fief
��
i gnat
I�
j F.(el
j...r-ter
^S
I
Century 21
falser
orAI#*
F•U■ Lager•.
Cg.rat Partial
C„1.LJ-"T_'
SECOND
11a41Pirw
111.1.6.4 NrHsa..
C.oHT
Goode's
Partist
a
NrPNa
Ca.at..a
tt.aNra
seat, �� seat stole, ��411111111!e
FIRST
N.r.Vi vial.. Caau. I
l.ralaa
It Jas.as
Cbtw� .
Jay's Pisa.
■avutly
C41atar
Ns.o 9as•ry
T
WASHING ON
I
If
AVENUE
LtNN
II l�
I f-
I ' tea
l.LC. ltar
tsNlt
Goes
IIS
Two !
Cost"
IBWA awe A, lit
Tore
a 1:40 IL
West Castro tww
t.►. p II
:ray
IlasNtw .�■... i
....„ �I Fit
u.. ...ltd
Tr. Nor Caw = j
ty ltaW flog* i
TUNfr. I C•_
l.bala Co
Po.saor.
Ta• 941...1• seat
AVE NUE I
tl.tf► pato fill
l,c,t -
a I Y:.'trt 791 •. a,
reveal.
FIR ,T
rill clliUN
•Nl 'Per also
I,
� am aN r• .ate ._
I
I I
-4e
L
iK•m.alT I
SECOND
citta•.: seek
-Too sees ftm oil
sets ON" oleo. 0
..«t.a
•eeNo ' ) e.•.
rarn
e•e
V60 seroma Pion
AVENUE
1(
•
I
of
w
►Ir10 app
M`
`
R ►eltraN
nue
j. i
ZZ7
wsretroose
c
«►i
1000tailfte
ce r
C Its Kati
►We•
►•rP••e
...... ,..
�'
•tell«
I
WASHINGTON
Me1se YNN
q :
Leader
a
-
Meteors •O •se
Htake" •teat•
slaye's •Epee•
'
>•N6
parle
Pete
re•i'll, •re•
pCereeie
Tsl Magi
li
h�Ne
'
area.;
reveal.
FIR ,T
rill clliUN
•Nl 'Per also
I,
� am aN r• .ate ._
I
I I
-4e
L
iK•m.alT I
SECOND
citta•.: seek
-Too sees ftm oil
sets ON" oleo. 0
..«t.a
•eeNo ' ) e.•.
rarn
e•e
V60 seroma Pion
AVENUE
1(
•
I
of
w
►Ir10 app
M`
`
R ►eltraN
r.• o, Cote
ry --o-sift
ZZ7
wsretroose
•o.:A trero,
Meer
Jendt's
Mahan Ya'4)
.edge
a Peters
p �
► al so
"
.Mar•« ,
i
Mpcker e '
Lose 1�
Cesatrt Y's Sf
0
E
e hsc
foe's Cs.
rT
S It • o'osn stamps ��
P,s Z. elj
Y.sm Sto•s i
AVENUE --Kong,
among,
41
1 • 11...t. veto" ►
SECOND
s
Met.. i =s N, hM.bw
2
.J •r... M.w.
YF.r•i..iwt
Zl
not Out
� l
l
-i'
41. got
AVENUE
i
7"11i
I
„...,.,,,,,.
s•.wt s..F1y
IL •rue...
THIRD
C..try 21
.Ori..•
1.611..
AVENUE S.
! F•11. Lul•.r1.
C..rr. ►.r.iwt
1
• 11a1 Perot
i
Iwr
J�11
also
[IN1n.lee
SECOND
FIRST
AVENUE
•
;
,
•_•
1.?60
p• 1
R
11.rrryi view 3,212
720
C.r..i.ee
11eee/r 1169.
1.926
1111..1..
vp
`--i
1111_ 1..r9„Ne
AVENUE
I.sulease" � w.e.6
NM C.1. Tim gody
Ne.
312
Kirby 1 1,4w.
wNa, &.WMrf
aebw
c...wn
/,842
It.. feet ,1111..
sm
NO;
SECONO
FIRST
llmlel
t8J 1.760
■
Jil Wy{ p ■ N•tMaGe
IL 4000" ts
Is"
SOSO
ont e.n a■«
tot
WWr
n
n r•Re
WASHMOTON
AVENUE
I L;,
AVENUE
AV E N`Y E
FIRST
I,2W w. •
taut■.:•
sNW■o's a+
a.•
soots
3,040,
�Mtly
ar•a•r
1.97 ams.
M•tM •NN
LOW
O: 5 t1/d•r
• 3, m
1,770 s•.YWr'•
2 a
'• I
Craig
• 2,024
l,ON
3rs7s iw•d••1 si..•
t60
1.206
•M
jar's wino
[1•
1•� I
Too soot acct
*solos• •■M+
1,.RQ s••tNtlq
�r171 f tMM
W
ttrtr N■•s 2 7d2
:. w. s••■rr
s.00a 1
W
* e
` '
Noai
1•r•.M•
City MNI hUO
am.•
1, •'
�—
L. Mille,
h
rt• s•r•N•
OI•M
1.956
WASHINGTON
-AVENUE
FIRST
e,�do
taut■.:•
sNW■o's a+
a.•
soots
3,040,
�Mtly
Mol■■Mw•
M•tM •NN
LOW
O: 5 t1/d•r
2.000 R ht•no•
f
2 a
'• I
.••....1w•
• 2,024
l,ON
3rs7s iw•d••1 si..•
1.206
two 1,a1
1
[1•
1•� I
Nol
' MNI. I,S;4
*solos• •■M+
1.711'
�r171 f tMM
s.00a 1
* e
` '
Noai
FIRST
SECOND
e,�do
taut■.:•
sNW■o's a+
a.•
soots
3,040,
�Mtly
124 s . M .r•H •WOOS
dtaoot
LOW
Nd spddci i
2.000 R ht•no•
rob sof•
2 a
�\\`\
2,020 rq uour
• 2,024
World THSN 2• }
1.206
.IWdo s•or
r
Mgoro 1,584
Nol
' MNI. I,S;4
*solos• •■M+
1.711'
�r171 f tMM
SECOND
ME
RP
AVENUE
8,510 ■pr+ tried
N NAsI•oo
1r11d p
ItN•M I,Sb
sw•r•n 2,530 �`�
Ytorl•ro
�
i
i
stet•
soots
3,040,
124 s . M .r•H •WOOS
dtaoot
./INl's 2.4w
Nd spddci i
3
•
ME
RP
AVENUE
8,510 ■pr+ tried
N NAsI•oo
1r11d p
ItN•M I,Sb
sw•r•n 2,530 �`�
Ytorl•ro
�
i
■
soots
3,040,
124 s . M .r•H •WOOS
dtaoot
./INl's 2.4w
dt■sd0 Semi
AVENUE
i■i
one sletMm#me _' !
1
Mr#s frees# 1.
losses seem 1.206
O1rSN
MN '
M.h'0 t.SM
1. b!
.5.120 LLeNs
tesssle Oe
SECOND
•s
sgser arms
.Kr3611
fro" "as
ae6 Out
►e.ite
r
"OIL
�u
FOURTH
<
a
THIRD AVENUE S. -
Neter .# 0 r\ rIFF
'
/s#te Lookers*
NNM surely.
letter
----------
pee
LeNero
coarse ------- - - - - --
AV
.
AV E. S.
leestre a'.
K NMi
•
p
Mwe
6 =1
sN
3.010 .
ail New.et.ae
s 2.l00
no Fro
Nest 2.200
AVENUE
$OUT
<
a
THIRD AVENUE S. -
Neter .# 0 r\ rIFF
'
/s#te Lookers*
NNM surely.
letter
----------
pee
LeNero
coarse ------- - - - - --
AV
.
AV E. S.
aL
r612) 587-5151
Hirb� CITY Of HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 24, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: REPORT ON COPPER WATER SERVICE CORROSION AND EROSION
During at least the past ten years the city has experienced a problem with
copper water services leaking due to the pipes becoming thin or porous.
Although incidents have occurred throughout the city, the most notable
occurrences have been on Main Street at the following locations:
- The former North Star Gas Station in 1977
- Post Office at 245 Main St. S. in 1981
- Lang's Wig Shop at 2 Main St. N. in 1985
- Mike's Mobil at 105 Main St. N in 1986
- Gold Coin at 35 Main St. N. in 1987
In judging pipe samples obtained from the most recent leak at Gold Coin, it
appears that the city is experiencing a corrosion and/or erosion problem. In a
report prepared for the influent (inflow) at the waste treatment plant and of
domestic sewage discharge at various points in the city's sewage collection
system showed abnormally high concentrations of suspended copper in the sewage.
Concentrations were of such magnitude in domestic sewage that, given allowable
copper concentrations in the treatment plant effluent (outflow) as established
Dy the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the efficiency of the treatment
plant in removing suspended copper, no suspended copper can be allowed in the
industrial sewage, thus placing a burden on industries to attempt to remove all
copper from its effluent. The elevated concentrations of dissolved copper were
not present in samples obtained from the treated water at the water treatment
plant, and are evidence of the erosion and corrosion of copper water services.
Ll
Memo - 11/24/87
Sources of Information
In an effort to determine causative factors of the apparent erosion/corro-
sion problem, various sources of information were consulted. Among them are
"Copper For Hot and Cold Portable Water Systems", a Penton/IPC Reinhold Publica-
tion; "Conditions Contributing to Underground Copper Corrosion% a paper
published in the American Water Works Association Journal; "Mitigating Copper
Pitting Through Water Treatment", a paper published in the American Water works
Association Journal; "Mitigation of Copper Tube Cold Water Pitting By Water
Treatment", a paper prepared for the 1984 International Corrosion Forum; and the
"Copper Water Service Corrosion Study" prepared for the City by RCM Associated,
Inc. Also the problem was discussed with local contractors and personal obser-
vations were made at Gold Coin.
Potential Factors Causing Erosion/Corrosion
Some or all of the following factors may be contributing to the loss of
copper in water services.
1. Agressive soils, usually soils high in organic content. This is not a
problem on Main Street where sand, gravel, or small amounts of clay are
prevalent, which seldom possess the properties associated with corrosion. A
high water table, also not present on most of Main Street, is also needed to
allow corrosion to occur.
2. Varying types of soil through which a copper service is installed can
cause an electrochemical corrosion to occur. However, since in the vast
majority of city projects the soils are similar in a given area, and backfill
operations require uniformity of soils in the pipe zone, the effects of varying
soils are all but.eliminated.
3. Stray direct current, such as from high voltage direct current
transmission systems, welding facilities and cathodic protection systems, can
flow in the earth through paths other than those intended. Should stray
currents flow onto an underground structure such as a water line, corrosion loss
would occur at the point where the direct current leaves the water line and re-
enters the earth. Although such corrosion would not result in copper being lost
to the water supply, this type of corrosion could have contributed to the
problem at Mike's Mobile where the underground fuel tanks have a cathodic
protection system.
4. Alternating current action on the corrosion of copper pipe is not yet
well understood. Investigators disagree
corrosion is enhanced in copper pipes by
that it is reasonable to assume that the
electrical systems to underground copper
Unfortunately such a practice is present'
code. Corrosion by this occurrence woulc
contribute to high copper concentrations
as to whether, and to what extent,
alternating current. But many believe
commonly used practice of grounding
water systems can lead to corrosion.
y required by the state electrical
be on the pipe exterior and would not
in the water.
5. Workmansnip and materials used during pipe installation can effect
longevity. Residual burrs left on pipe seating surfaces can cause turbulence in
the water flow that may erode the pipe. Certain soldering flux compounds can
have a corrosive effect or, CODper. Copper material itself could have
manufacturing deficiencies that could cause problems under certain circumstances
2
Nemo - 11/24/87
but over ail the industr considers copper to be an excellent material due to
its immunity to corrosion.
6. The concentration of dissolved carbon dioxide in the water can have a
detrimental effect if above a certain threshold. In the case of the city's
water supply, dissolved carbon dioxide is two to three times greater than levels
considered to exist in nonaggressive waters. Decreasing dissolved carbon
dioxide would decrease pitting corrosion on the interior of the pipe.
Pit initiation, investigators believe, seems to be connected with
intermittent use where the system remains stagnant for several hours, like
overnight in a residential situation. This tends to reinforce the findings of
the Pace report in which high copper concentrations were found in domestic
sewage outflow. Installations where there is a continuous demand for water are
less likely to experience pitting corrosion.
7. Water hardness will not usually determine whether a water is corrosive,
but if the level of hardness is slightly greater than the level the water can
hold some of the mineral hardness will form on the pipe interior. Investigators
believe the coating to be beneficial in deterring pitting corrosion and erosion
because of the protective barrier it forms.
8. Excessive flow velocity of water within the pipe can result in
deterioration of the pipe. Water whose chemistry may not be quite sufficient to
cause a problem at a low velocity may create a problem at a higher velocity.
The protective scale normally observed in copper pipes exposed to stable water
can be eroded away by fast flowing water leaving the underlying copper surface
unprotected. The pipe can then literally erode away.
Although erosion and corrosion of copper pipes can be caused by any one or
a combination of these factors, and possibly more, the City's problem would seem
to be due to inordinately high concentrations of diss&lved carbon dioxide and by
high flow velocities. Several past repairs, including that at Gold Coin, showed
the pipe badly deteriorated in the five or six feet nearest to the water main,
while the balance of the water service was in good condition. The portion of
the water service near the main is subject to turbulent flows which, when
combined with the water chemistry can and have eroded and corroded away the
pipe.
Grounding of electrical services to water systems could have a detrimental
effect but sources disagree as to whether such grounding causes a problem and if
so to what degree. The State Electrical Inspector does not believe that
grounding causes a problem.
Proposed Solutions
The concentration of dissolved carbon dioxide should be reduced to make the
water less aggressive. One attempted solution was initiated at the water treat-
ment plant this summer, that being a better more thorough means of aerating the water
prior to it entering the distribution system. In so doing the intent was to
release excessive amounts of dissolved carbon dioxide. However improved aera-
tion had little if any effect. The addition o` caustic chemicals to the water
at the treatment plant will result it a reduction of dissolved carbon dioxide.
Included in the water department's 1988 budget request was $26,000. for equip
• ment to store and to feed caustic 'nt� the water. The estimated annual chemical
cost at present day cost is $84,000., Vwhich .translates to aoout $1.09 per capita
per quarter assuming average useage. An alternative solution to the aggressive
Memo - 11/24/87
water problem is the addition of phosphates to the water which would neutralize
the electrcal nature of the corrosion process. Equipment to store and to feed
the chemicals should cost less than $5,000., and the chemicals themselves about
$8,000. per year. The basic difference between the processes is that the first
mitigates corrosion at the water treatment plant while the second process acts
to minimize corrosion throughout the system. Inbalances in flows and usage
throughout the system could make the second alternative less dependable, al-
though the estimated annual cost is about one-tenth that of the caustic chemical
alternative.
A -second solution to the problem is to reduce the velocity of flow in the
water service to a level that would be unlikely to cause pipe deterioration.
One way of so doing is to install larger diameter service pipes. The
engineering department began installing 1" diameter water services to homes on
construction projects in 1987. Previously the standard service size was 3/40.
Summary
The copper erosion/corrosion that the city is experiencing is a complicated
problem. But from all indications, reducing system velocities and altering the
chemistry of the water will, if not cure the problem, greatly prolong service
life.
We will continue to investigate this problem in an effort to determine any
other possible causes, and whether other potential solutions could be effected.
Respectfully submitted,
Eugen nderson
Director of Engineering
EA/bb
cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
James Marka, Building Official
Georae F. Field, Fire Marshal
Randy De'2ries, -__Jr. Water/Wastewater operations
Dick Nacy, Nater Systems Supervisor
Join Bernhaaen
1
0
0
ANALYSIS
OF
OPINION SURVEY
COMMUNITY OF RUTCRINSON
Compiled by: Amy Koren
Mary Baumgarten
BUSINES-z TO BUSINESS
TELEMARRFTIN, PROGRA`".
Marke: Research '�pt'o❑
Technical institute of Hutchinson
2WC.OM yA"nw.MulehinWn.MN36750-7183
,i
The occupations of those surveyed show strong representation
of the retired, clerical. management and professionals.
Making note of the fact that a large portion of the
population of Hutchinson is laborers and farmers, these not
being represented proportionately in the survey. 40,
F 78
P.
E 65
Q
U 52
E
N 39
C
Y 26
13
OCCUPATION
SURVEY ■
C
• • • r A '� • r O r A '�
'O Y , I ■, r • M 6
YYY¢P A ,
Y � 4
n
n
z
Analysis of the survey shows that those completing the survey
have lived in Hutchinson an extended length of time or have
moved to the city in recent years.
TIME IN HUTCHINSON
SURVEY W
1 SIG
L J
0
The survey conducted with the citizens of the City of
Hutchinson resulted in feedback from an audience of 391
• participants.
Following is a graph depicting the distribution of responses
to the survey according to location.
0
F 102
R
E 85
Q
U 68
E
N 51
C
Y 34
17
E
SOURCE OF SURVEY
SURVEY ■
y Vtl r r M
a - L •O
M b h •! • N !�
w ■ P C 1� '<
N .a r • Y 4
i fA a w w 3
» : •1 w .J
M A •�
0 • r
� w
Y
The information was gathered from the elder segment of the
population, with the majority of those surveyed being over
the age of 40.
F a E.
R
n
II e4
E
N 43
1 AG
if
A
AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSE
SURVEY ■
O � J � •J. J n
•� wl O O O r
7
3
Housing is a major concern for those sampled. The following
graphs depict these needs and concerns being market rate
rental apartments, low cost rental apartments, single family
rental houses, and single family owned houses.
HOUSING NEEDED
NO RESF
IPI
NO
80
YES
120
MARKET RATE RENT APT -
HOUSING NEEDED
SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE
OWNERSHIP
YES
173
NO
�b
NO YES
172RESF H170
41
HOUSIt1G NEEDED
HOUSING NEEDED
LOM COST RENTAL APT.
HOUSING NEEDED
SINGLE FAMILY P,ENTAL
HOUSE
TOWNHOUSE OR CONDO
NI7 RESP
[it7
NO RESP
122
NOM
RESP
•,
7
E
0
0
F 342
R
E 285
0
Ll 228
E
M 1'1
C
v 114
57
0
100KING FOR HOUSING
SURVEY 0
An important point to note from the survey is that 11.5% of
those polled are looking for different housing at the present
time.
Most of the audience polled feel that Hutchinson, as a whole,
provides adequate stores in which to shop.
F 22'
k
p
II 15Z
E
h 114
i r G
N
ADEQUATE STORES_
SURVEY ■
But the market sampled shows dissatisfaction with the
downtown shopping district with shopping preference being at
the Mall and out of town.
F
R
E
0
U
E
N
C
Y
126
185
84
63
42
21
WHERE WE SHOP
The following graph shows that lack of variety, inconvenient
store hours, parking, and unreasonable prices are the major
problem areas of the downtown shopping district.
PROBLEMS IN DOWNTOWN
NO RESP IM
NO
F 22e
R
E 190
Q. 152
E
N 114
C
Y 76
30
ca
F C
G
q
F
R
..
..
Y
R
O
-
p
<
O
y
q
ID
'C
C
�+
y
a
S
s
c
r
Y
a`N
The following graph shows that lack of variety, inconvenient
store hours, parking, and unreasonable prices are the major
problem areas of the downtown shopping district.
PROBLEMS IN DOWNTOWN
NO RESP IM
NO
F 22e
R
E 190
Q. 152
E
N 114
C
Y 76
30
ca
F C
G
q
F
-
Y
R
O
-
p
<
O
y
q
ID
'C
C
�+
y
S
x
W
0
Those concerned with the future of the downtown shopping
district think that more retail. more restaurants, and more
specialty shops should be considered.
F 216
E 180
U 144
N 198
Y 72
M
6
FUTURE OF [DOWNTOWN
NO RESP Ail
YES
NO Qa
G O
w •
p
n
O
O
h ..
N N
•7
O
c
�
•
�
P
•
'.
•
7
P
a
•
•
..
<
w
?
O
O
�
n
n
r
Listed below are the most frequently listed responses to the
opinion questions within the Business & Commercial section of
the survey. (Note the large number of nonresponse to these
questions.)
III. B. What types of stores or services should Hutchinson
have that is not now provided?
Stores Most Requested Tallies
1. Variety 27
2. Target 23
3. Department Store 22
4. Discount Building ;tore 2"
5. Steak House 15
• 242 did mot respond
IIT. D. Why would you shop out of town? e`
Reasons Most Requested Tallies
1. Better Variety 83
2. Selection Greater 81
3. Better Prices 73
• 197 surveyed did not respond
IIL. G. Please feel free to list any other areas that you
would like to see changed. *
Areas To Be Changed Tallies
1. Steak House 10
2. Revitalization of Downtown 9
* 328 surveyed did not -respond
Listed below are the most frequently listed responses to the
opinion questions within the General section of the survey.
IV. A. What do you like about Hutchinson?
Liked Tallies
1. Clean Town so
2. Nice Size 80
3. Friendly 75
* 117 did not respond
IV. B. What do you dislike about Hutchinson? *
Dislike Tallies
1. Traffic 28
2. Parks as Hang Out/Library 20
3. City Government 19
6. High Property Taxes 19
5. Deterioration of Downtown 17
* 219 surveyed did not respond
IV. C. List one or two things you think Hutc'inson should be
improved upon.
d;d nct respcnd
Improvements
Ta:lie_
1.
ReStaUr3ntS
-7
Traffic
22
3.
Transportation
20
6.
Better Stores Downtown
16
5.
Cospetttire Liquor Store
t2
5.
Youth Center
12
d;d nct respcnd
!.
i
0
Building Survey - Hutchinson
Completed: December 1987
By: Doug Jost, Energy
Coordinator
Based
on condition of:
1.
Exterior Walls
7.
2.
Foundation
8.
3.
Plumbing
9.
4.
Wall Insulation
10.
5.
Exterior Doors
11.
6.
Roof
Graded 1. New
HVAC System
Foundation Insulation
Exterior Windows
Electrical System
Roof Insulation
2. Good - Above Average
3. Fair - okay, Average - Acceptable
4. Poor - In disrepair - part of it may need replacement
(substandard)
5. Replace - definitely needs replacement or shouldn't
exist as is.
Numbers on map are averages of above 11 conditions. A 3.0 is all
right; a 3.1 or higher is substandard or is substantially deficient.
H.C.D.C. Downtown Survey Results
Structures W/Deficiencies/Total # Structures
Zones 1-12
1. 2/3
3. 5/5
5. 14/18
7. 9/12
9. 2/5
11. 1/2
Total 69/96
72%
2. 4/7
4. 13/14
6. 8/12
B. 8/11
10. - 2/6
•
to
COS b
TP'
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8670
TRANSFERRING $30,000 FROM STORE TO GENERAL FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT $30,000 is hereby transferred by the Liquor Store to the General
Fund.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
P
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8671
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SECURITIES
TO FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, First Bank of Minnesota of Hutchinson, a duly designated
depository of the City, has requested the release of the following security:
U.S. Treas Notes 04/30/88 $200,000
which has heretofore been pledged as collateral security for the account of
the City with such depository is hereby released.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Treasurer is hereby authorized to release and return to said
depository the security requested.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 1987.
ATTEST:
• Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ri
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8672
RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING AND ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT LOAN FUND
BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON:
THAT the annual budget of the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal year be-
ginning January 1, 1987, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and
modified and approved by the City Council is hereby adopted; the totals of said
budget and the major divisions thereof being as follows:
FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING
Ravanua
Federal Government Transfer $2,882.00
(No disbursements are budgeted for 1987)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN
Revenues
Loan Repayment $19,484.00
(No disbursements are budgeted for 1987)
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 1987.
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
f .5151
{61Z 587
;vurcH ' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST .
DECEMBER 15, 1987
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
-----------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 1987 BUDGETS FOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
--------------------------------------------------------------
A budget for our special revenue funds for 1987 must be approved
by the city council. We have two such funds - federal revenue
sharing and Economic Development Loan.
The accompanying resolution adopts a budget for each of these
funds for 1987. As you notice they are budgets without any
expeditures. In 1988 we will be adopting a proposed budget for
federal revenue sharing to use the funds in the police facility. •
Our Economic Development Loan will continue to grow for at least
a couple of more years to allow the dollars to build.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8663
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
LDEPT
BUDGET
VENDOR
1,000 Gals. road oil
4,440.0
Street Maintenance
I
Street
Yes
Koch Materials Co.
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Date Approved:
•Motion made by:
Seconded by:
December 8, 1987 Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
(6 Id-) 587.5151
CITY Or HUTCHINSON
37 d✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
H. UTCHINSON..MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: rkP rAmh r 11 . 1gR7
Ken Merrill and Cit�Cot}ngiL——— -— -—— — — — — ——
Lard Kar j — Street Supervisor
PURCHASE OF ROAD OIL
I am requesting the purchase of 6000 gallons of RC 800 road
oil. This amount will replenish the supply that we started with
at the start of the 1987 construction season. In conversation with
the supplier, they indicate that the price will certainly be rising.
This is a budget item for which there are still funds available.
There was a purchase order made out and this item was on the
December 8th Council Agenda, Resolution No. 8663.
We request authorization to proceed with the purchase before
January 1st.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Larry Karg
Street Supervisor
E
•
7-d
0
P
.•
December 17, 1987
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Hutchinson Police Station Furnishings
Comm. No. 8718
Mr. Plotz:
Kan~ Ar&Aectwe
LOO
�
sWe.3o2
Washington IWC,. East
Hutehimon, Min2Ota
50
812/587-2483
w T c
DEC 1987
RECEIVED
sY
I have reviewed the bids received today on the furnishings for the
new police facility, and recommend the acceptance of the Allen
Office Supply bid of $17,374.00.
Sincerely yours,
John W. Ko
Korngiebel
JWK/mjr
Enclosure
iebel, AI11
chitecture
DECEOER 17, 1987
BID TAB - FURNISHINGS - HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION
0
•
BASE BID
Family Rexall Drug
$21,228.96
Marco Business Products
22,163.00
Berg Office Supplies
20,943.58
Allen Office Products
17,374.00
Bennett Office Supplies
23,094.95
•
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL B. Le BARON
GARY D. M�DOWRLL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOGE
CHARLES 1. NAIL. JR.
LURA R. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
December 14, 1987
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
301 PARR PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Aveneu West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(812)587-7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Main Street Review Committee
Our File No. 3188-87-0052
5881 CEDAR LARK ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. HINNE50TA 55610
(812)545 8000
MN TOLL PREP 800-343-4545
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(012)388-2214
o Oar. ;9E7 N
O) N
00 RECEIVED
J
LO v)
,`yi
Dear Gary:
• As you may recall, the City Council at its last meeting deferred
action on the resolution that I drafted creating a nonbinding
architectural review committee. I have now heard from John
Piper, the Duluth Downtown Renaissance Program Administrator and
I am enclosing the following documents which, along with this
letter, the Council may be interested in reviewing prior to the
next City Council meeting:
1. Piper's letter of November 18, 1987;
2. The Duluth Downtown Renaissance Brochure;
3. A general information page dealing with the downtown
store front renovation and loan programs;
4. The operational guidelines for the duties of a program
administrator for store front revitalization;
5. A copy of the conditional agreement to lend.
I have also received a variety of other documents from Duluth
that may be helpful to Senator Bernhagen in the administration
of the Hutchinson version of this project and by carbon copy of
this letter, I am notifying him that he might be interested in
coming over to our office at his convenience and reviewing these
• documents.
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
December 14, 1987
Page A2
If you have any questions in connection with the foregoing,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLDfIC;cOWELL
G. Bar n erson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
CC Senator John Bergnhagen
•
•
0
November 18, 1987
Mr. Barry Anderson
City Attorney
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Barry:
Sorry I'm a little tardy in getting this information out to you. I am enclosing
some forms we developed over the past few years for our Storefront Program.
As you can see, a great deal of work has gone into this program but it has been
very rewarding. To date, I have fifty—six buildings in the Program under various
stages of construction and completion. We have loans totaling approximately $3.5
million. The maximum loan we allow at 3% is $300,000. There is no minimum,
although we try to discourage loans under $3,000 to $4,000 but there have been
exceptions.
I am enclosing a typical project for the Oreck's Building. This will give you an
approximate sequence, although there is a lot of work between the lines. I an also
enclosing some typical "Exhibit A's" that will'give you examples of different
buildings.
Working with the owner, architect and if possible, the contractor, I make up an
estimate for construction. I break this down into the different categories,
public eligible, any related code work and private eligible. Public eligible is
the related work on the exterior of the building. This is what the owner can
receive the 3% loan on. We will also include any related code work on the
interior at equal to the cost of the public. To receive the full amount of the 3%
monies available for the exterior, the owner must match that amount with interior
work. This is an incentive for the owner to fix up his whole building. If the
owner wants to do nothing but the exterior we will loan one half of the total cost.
There are many more things I can go into but I think you should go over some of
the information and start to develop your program, tailoring it to your needs.
I would be very pleased to answer any questions that arise.
Yours ru y,
i
• John W. Piper
Program Administrator
JWP:mp:1202
Office of Business Development, 400 City Hall, Duluth, Minnesota 55802 (218) 723-3558 (% .
Storefront Renovation • Streetscape • Building Cleaning • Skywalks • Redevelopment 0
,
' 3�
x 4:
Y
Mi
What dN Cky Has to N/Ai . .
The City of Duluth hopes to
improve the overall appear-
ance of the downtown 'through
its Storefront Renovation and
Downtown Renaissance Loan pro-
grams.
Through the Storefront Renova-
tion Program, an ai_cl tect
un3e-r contract with the City
will consult you and prepare
preliminary drawings and cost
estimates for improving your
storefront. This service is
free of charge and you are
under no obligation.
The Downtown Renaissance Loan
Pro�r11 provides low-interest
ini" ancing for your storefront
renovation. improving your
storefront qualifies you for
additional low interest fi-
nancing for:
- skywalk improvements
- exterior building repairs
and cleaning
- code -required improvements
7.,1,.-1.
no
.JlntJ
•
Private, leasehold improve-
ments can also be financed in
an amount equal to the total
spent on the "public -related"
improvements listed previous-
ly.
Examples of "private" improve-
ments include:
- fixtures (i.e., shelving)
- equipment (i. e., cash regis-
ters, lighting)
- building additions
How the Fkt&wd p Wwks.. .
The City has made a pool of
money available through local
banks to be loaned at 3% an-
nual interest for one half
the qualifying loan amount.
The other half of the loan
amount would be funded at mar-
ket rate from the participat-
ing bank or privately by the
loan applicant. A typical
loan in early 1983, then,
would carry a combined inter-
est rate of approximately 8e.
The bank will determine the
length of the loan up to 20
years and service it. The
following local banks will be
handling the loans for the
City:
First Bank - Duluth
North Shore Bank of
Commerce
Norwest Bank
St. Louis County Federal
First Federal savings 6
Loan
• I `
Federat Tax Creeps
With substantial rehabilita-
tion o�roperty, you
may qualify for federal in-
vestment tax credits:
25% for qualified historic
structures
20% for any building over
40 years old
15; for any building 30-40
years old.
The City will assist any in-
terested property owner or
tenant located downtown.
(See map on back)
To participate or learn more
about the programs, contact.
John W. Piper
Office of Business Development
723-3568
D -U -L -U -T -H
Office of Business Development, 400 City Hall, Duluth, Minnesota 55802 218/723-3556
DOWNTOWN STOREFRONT RENOVATION AND LOAN PROGRAMS
PURPOSE: To stimulate building renovation and improve the overall appearance
oofthe downtown's many historic and architecturally -interesting buildings.
This program provides the financial tools necessary to allow building owners
and tenants to repair, rehabilitate, and protect these structures.
ELIGIBLE USES: Provide low-interest financing for one-half the cost of
storefront renovation, code -required improvements, and owners' share of
skywalk construction. Emphasis is given to storefront renovation including
building cleaning, signage, use of colors, window replacement, and kneewall
areas.
This program calls for a matching amount of private improvements in order
to maximize the amount of the low-interest loans for the storefront, code,
and skywalk work. Private matching costs include any expenditures for
the building or business except building purchase, inventory, or refinancing
of existing debt.
The City provides an architect to consult with participants and prepare
preliminary drawings and cost estimates for improving the storefronts.
There is no obligation, and this service is free of charge.
STRUCTURE: The City has made a pool of money available through local banks
to be loaned at 3% annual interest for one half of the qualifying loan amount.
The remaining half of the loan amount is funded at market rate from the
participating bank, or privately by the loan applicant. The bank will
determine the length of the loan, take all fiduci3-cy responsibility, and
service the loan. This program is funded by tax increment financing and is
available for properties located in the Downtown Development District #2.
CONTACT: Office of Business Development
City Hall, Room 400
Duluth, MN 55802
(218) 723-3556
RENAISSANCE
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES
Duties of Program Administrator for Storefront Revitalization:
a) Distribute approved loan application forms to potential
Borrowers under the Program.
b) Explain Program requirements, eligibility, eligibility of
costs and other factors relating to the Program to poten-
tial Borrowers.
c) Receive loan applications and supporting documentation
from potential Borrowers.
d) Conduct an initial review of the application and support-
ing materials for sufficiency, as set forth below, for
submission to other reviewing entities.
e) Transmit a copy of the application and supporting documen-
tation to the Loan Review Committee, the Design Review
Committee for the storefront and building exterior program,
the Program Architect, the City Building Inspector, and
the City Fire Marshal for review.
f) Provide advice to the Loan Review Committee in its deliber-
ations.
g) Issue a Conditional Agreement to Lend to Borrower if autho-
rized by the Loan Review Committee and condition said Agree-
ment as said Committee shall direct.
h) Authorize draw -down on loans extended as provided for in
the terms of the various Loan Agreements and Notes evidenc-
ing said loans if said draw -down is approved by the Project
Architect and if lien waivers for the work in question have
been provided.
i) Review plans and specifications for sufficiency of descrip-
tion of the work to be performed on the Subject Property
and review the estimates for the cost of each element of
said Work for accuracy.
j) Monitor the construction performed pursuant to any loan
extended under the Program for conformance of the Work
with that approved on the City's Loan Agreement and Note.
k) Approve draw -down requests as set forth in Paragraph 6.10
below.
•
•
0
0
CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT TO LEND
TO:
(Borrower)
Pursuant to the Authority created in me by Duluth City Council Resolution
No. 82-0826 and to the approval of the Loan Review Committee, the City of
Duluth does hereby agree to lend to Borrower the sum of not to exceed
($ ) for
the performance of the entire Program of Work as shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof, said Work to be performed on or in the following
described property:
The Loan to be extended by the City shall bear an interest rate of three
percent (3i) and the term and payment schedule thereof shall run coextensively
with that of the bank financing a portion of the remaining costs of performing
the Work shown on Exhibit A.
This Agreement to Lend is conditioned as follows:
1. Receipt of a loan by a participating lending agency to finance a por-
tion of the Work to be done in or on the building which, when taken together
with Borrower's equity participation and the City Loan, shall be sufficient to
complete the Program of Work set forth in Exhibit A.
2. The final amount of the City's Loan will not exceed fifty percent
(50%) of the final or actual costs of performing the Work and, where deter-
minable, shall be no more than the Public -Eligible Costs of the Work done.
AG00002 -1-
3. In the event that the Scope of the Work in the building is cut the
following elements shall remain in the Program of Work to be performed in order
for Borrower to qualify for the extension of the City Loan:
4. The agreement of Borrower to perform elements of the Program of Work
as shown on Exhibit A which are not being financed by the City and which have
costs at least equal to or greater than the amount of the City Loan.
5. Borrower shall agree to complete the entire Scope of Work on or
before the day of , 198_. •
6. Borrower's agreement to authorize Agency, in writing, to give City's
Trustee access to all information pertaining to Borrower possessed by a lending
agency upon reasonable demand by the Trustee and allowing the Trustee to call
the City Loan in the event that the Borrower refuses to give Trustee such
access.
7. Other conditions as listed in the Downtown Renaissance Loan Program
Operational Guidelines.
8. Such other provisions or conditions as the Loan Review Committee
shall deem reasonable and appropriate.
Those portions of the Work, the costs of which are Public -Eligible Costs
and Private -Eligible Costs are so denominated on Exhibit A.
CITY OF DULUTH
Program Administrator
Downtown Renaissance Loan Program •
Date
AG00002 -2-
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8666
WHEREAS, the Community of Hutchinson has a need and desire to
rehabilitate the central business district, and, WHEREAS, the
appearance and design of downtown buildings is important to any
rehabilitation effort in the Community of Hutchinson, and,
WHEREAS, a committee with authority to offer non-binding recom-
mendations regarding design and appearance would be helpful in pro-
viding uniformity and establishing a unified theme throughout the
central business district of the City of Hutchinson;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson does
hereby authorize the creation of the main street design review com-
mittee to be composed of representatives of merchants, building
owners and municipal building officials for the purpose of reviewing
and approving construction and building rehabilitation in the
central business district. The committee shall have the authority
to review the proposed rehabilitation and design of buildings
located within the central business district but shall act in an
advisory capacity only and shall have no authority to alter the
plans and specifications. Committee review shall be for the purpose
of determining whether or not the 'proposed improvement is consistent
•
with the overall goals of the City of Hutchinson in the long-term
development of the central business district. The committee's
geographical responsibilities shall be limited to the area between
Fourth Avenue South and the Crow River and between Hassen Street and
Franklin Street but in any event shall not include area beyond Tax
Increment Districts I and II.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of December, 1987.
Attest:
Gary Plotz
City Administrator
Ll
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
(612) 587.5151
HvrcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
December 16, 1987
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Attached is a job description which we have developed for the
position of PARK MAINTENANCE, GENERAL. This would be a Grade VII
position, with starting pay of $7.46. This job description
details less skill and responsibility than the PARK MAINTENANCE
OPERATOR classification presently in use.
. Authorization is requested to advertise to fill the position
of PARK mAIWENANCE, GENERAL. We would follow the normal procedure
of advertising publicly, screening and interviewing before selecting
an employee.
E
TITLE
DEPARTMENT
PARR MAINTENANCE, GENERAL
PARRS 6 RECREATION
SUPERVISED BY DIRECTOR OF PAW AND RECREATION
jobdes59
12-87
VII
-as-
SUMMARY THIS IS WORK INVOLVING MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES IN THE PARRS
AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
1 Provides limited supervision of seasonal employees who are assigned to
maintenance duties.
2 Performs turf maintenance including mowing, seeding and aerating and
fertilizing park areas.
3 Maintains decorative areas such as flower beds and shrubs.
Y Maintains all recreational athletic playing surfaces (softball, baseball,
football, hookey, ate.)
5 Maintains public buildings to include shelters, rest rooms, warming
houses, Civic Arena and Recreation Center.
6 Operates and maintains a variety of light equipment related to
maintenance duties.
7 Performs a variety of maintenance and repair duties as needed.
8 Assists with forestry duties such as tree trimming, pruning and planting.
9 Performs duties related to special occasions such as installing
Christmas deoorationa, flags, set up for Water Carnival, special events
at the Civic Arena and Recreation Center, Arts and Crafts, Sno-Break and
other community related events.
10 Operates necessary equipment for the mosquito control program.
11 Performs necessary maintenance of playground equipment
12 May assist other departments (street, engineering, etc.) as required.
13 Performs related duties as required.
EQUIPMENT
All liqht equipment and machinery of the Parks/Recreation Department.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge and experience in operation of equipment. Knowledge or experience
in maintenance of athletic facilities. Willingness to accept a variety of
duties. Ability to work well with fellow employees and the public.
WORKING CONDITIONS
Considerable contact with the public. Inside and outside work in all weather.
Unscheduled hours for snow removal and special events. Participation in a
rotating shift involving evenings and weekends.
0
•
(612) 587-5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 22, 1987
T0: Mayor $ City Council
FROM:
Water Billing Department
-------- --------------------
SUBJECT: Delinquent water $ sewer accounts for the month of December
-----------------------------
Attached is a listing of the delinquent accounts for water, sewer
and refuse for the month of Dec. Recommend water service be dis-
continued on Tuesday, December 29th, 1987 at Noon.
E
Ll
Mae Siemsen Wy Aanderu Jane Mulligan
14 Century Ave E 12 Centu Ave E 595 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutc i on MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
14 Century AV E 120 ury Ave E 595 Franklin St S
1-295-0014-061 1- 5-01 -072 1-395-0595-023
80.35 9.49 69.23
Promises 12/29 Promises 12/31
Ricky Grant Anton Kopitski Jon Kaping
115 Glen St S 530 Glen St S 706 Glen St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
115 Glen St S 530 Glen St S 706 Glen St S
1-420-0115-027 1-420-0530-092 1-420-0706-071
115.30 109.56 129.15
cc: Loren Lickfelt
137 Garden Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
Kenneth Albrecht Douglas Winn •
732 Grove St S 506 Main St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
732 Grove St S 506 Main St S
1-455-0732-031 1-685-0506-092
60.25 19.43
Sharri Rasco Donald Yaeger Len Rieman (Broaster)
140 Washington AV E 726 Churchill St 620 Hwy 7 E
Hutchinson MN 55350 Eau Claire WI 54701-03 Hutchinson MN 55350
646 Second AV SE 512 California St 640 Hwy 7 E
3-030-0646-087 3-275-0512-037 3-500-0640-055
56.48 222.19 34.85
cc: Vicky Klabunde cc: Jim Reid Promises 1/4/88 •
Route 1 Box 218 357 Shady Ridge Rd
Brownton Mn 55312 Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 1/8/88
•
•
1987
McLeod County Heritage & Cultural Center a '`
Highway 7 and School Road Mr Br
Hutchinson, Minnesota
November 30, 1987
Mayor Paul Ackland
Hutchinson City Council
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Mayor Paul Ackland:
Re: McLeod County Heritage & Cultural Center
Please consider this agenda item for the December 22nd, 1987 council meeting.
The McLeod County Histroical Society is very pleased that the Heritage and
Cultural Center became a reality in 1987. We feel that it will be a very
Positive addition to McLeod County and also to the city of Hutchinson. A special
Thank You is in order to the city of Hutchinson for their assistance during the
construction phase.
We are still in those painful growing stages and therefore, we are asking the
city of Hutchinson for the following:
1. Cutting and trimming of grass on our property. The seeding and sodding
has not taken place at this time, but is scheduled as a spring project.
2. Snow removal on driveway and parking lot.
3. Financial assistance in our operating budget for the next two years. Our
goal is to be self-sufficient in the near future, but we feel that we need
financial assistance for the first two years. Our request from the city of
Hutchinson is $ 5,000.00 annually for two years. We estimate that our budget
will be $ 50.000.00 annually. Other sources of income for our budget are
listed below;
1.
McLeod County
2.
Cities in McLeod County
3.
Fourteen Townships
4.
Membership dues
5.
Fund Raisers
6.
Gift Shop
7.
Research charges
8.
Grants Available
Your consideration for the above items will be appreciated.
Sincerely, /
Everett Hantge, Pres.
McLeod County Historical Society
R
5.5
,, ,Y CITY OF HU TCHINSON
;ti GSc.rr.,•_ T ••ti 4 v -NU -NES'
M E M O
DATE: December 16, 1987
TO: '"Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director. of Engineering
RE: Snow Removal Requested by McLeod County Historical Society
With regard to the Historical Society's request of the City to clear snow
from their driveway and parking lot, we have four misgivings.
1. Budget constraints are not conducive to adding to the workload
of the Street Department.
2. Limited available manhours would, for reasons of public interest,
best be utilized on public right-of-way.
3. Other private entities may request, if not expect, snow removal
on their private property, in the event the City accomodate the
Historical Society's request.
4. Should the Citv assume the snow removal work, liabilities for
property damage would be incurred to which the City's insurance
carrier may object.
We recommend that the requested snow removal be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
^-Lk-'-'i 4—q
Eugene Anderson.
_irector of Engineerina
_taco en=
-_. Dc -,:T :,:eisr
Lary- Kar --
11
V,Y PARKS a RECREATION a FORESTRY
900 Harrington Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 587-2975
SENIOR CENTER CIVIC ARENA
587-6564 587-4279
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Bruce Ericson
DATE: December 18, 1987
SUBJECT: McLeod County heritage and Cultural Center Mowing Request
I have reviewed the site plan for the facility and estimate
that there is approximately 2h- 3 acres which will need to be
maintained. By comparing this to some existing parkland of equal
size, I feel this would require approximately 75 mowing hours per
year. The cost to the city for these hours including operators
cost and mower cost (gas, oil, repair, etc) would be approximately
$575/year.
I would anticipate this would need to be done on a weekly
basis. We do have some areas on a weekly schedule, which at times
becomes difficult, depending on weather and growing conditions,
this needs to understood by the Heritage Center. However, barring
any major breakdowns, I feel this could be accomplished if the
decision is to maintain this property.
klm
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 10, 1987
TO: -111M�yor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Improvements on T.H. 22 from Fair Avenue to Biscay
Attached for the Council's consideration is a resolution that requests MN/DOT
to proceed with design of the referenced project, which is scheduled for
construction in 1989. By adopting the resolution, the Council is, also,
resolving its intention of entering into a cooperative agreement with MN/DOT,
which agreement would, among other things, provide for participation by the
• City in its share of the cost. A preliminary estimate of the City's cost has
been determined by MN/DOT to be $90,000, which cost could be funded by
Municipal State Aid or possibly, Federal Aid Urban Allocations, and assessments.
The portion of T.H. 22 within the corporate limits is currently planned to be
52 feet in width with curb and gutter on both sides. Such a width is needed to
accommodate turning movements, especially trucks.
We recommend that the resolution be adopted.
EA/pv
attachment
0
Respectfully submitted,
EugeneoAnderson
Director of Engineering
•
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, proposes
to oke certain improvements on a portion of Trunk Highway No. 22 located in the
City of Hutchinson in McLeod County, upon and along
Adams (Street) Mme): and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the city that such improvements of said
roadway along said street be extended to greater width and capacity than is
necessary to accommodate normal -trunk highway traffic, from 0.1 mile East of
Bridge 4913 (Crow River) to Fair Avenue
(a distance of approximately 2600feet).
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Hutchinson that the State
• of Minnesota, Department of Transportation -is requested to provide for i.^_;rove-
ments on the aforesaid portion of Trunk Highway No. 22 _ consisting particularly
Of: CURB & GUTTER, STORM SEWER, GRADING AND SURFACING
and considered as construction and improvement of said roadway to greater width
and earacity than is necessary to accormodate normal trunk highway traf'ic.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that following approval by the Slinnesota "e;a rt-
ment of Transportation of pians and specifications for said inprovenents of said
trunk hi^.hway and before a contract is awarded for the eonstrnctinn of
i ,+rnvements, the city shall enter into an a reenent with the State whic-
_.rnvide that the :itj sr?ll ^?y its >h;ire ^f the cost of the ra'uested --re-
to rents as determined by the state in keeping with its latest edition of !7:.'"()T
Directives - Basic Policies and Procedures, Cooperative Construction Projects
greet 1 rf
with Municipalities (a copy of which has been received from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation's District Engineer) and, that if the State lets
the construction contract, the municipality will deposit with the State upon .
demand, after the execution of the agreement and before the start of construc-
tion, a sum equal to an estimate of the city share as prepared by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation.
The city shall, in addition to paying its proportionate share of the
cost of the proposed work, obtain at its sole cost and expense all necessary
right of way easements and construction permits for the work to be performed
outside the limits of the trunk highway or established city streets and roads,
together with all drainage outlet rights where necessary. Such easements,
permits and rights shall be obtained and certified copies of them furnished the
Department of Transportation before any contract for the proposed work is awarded.
fyote: Furnish Itinnesota Department of
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF M WESOTA
)
COUNTY OF McLeod
)
CITY OF Hutchinson
)
I hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution is a true and correct
copy of a Resolution
presented to and adopted
by the City of Hutchinson
by the City Council at a meeting thereof held
in the City of Hutchinson
Minnesota, on the
day of
, 19_ as disclosed by the
records of said city
in my possession. Dated
this day of 19
(SFAL)
City
Clerk
fyote: Furnish Itinnesota Department of
0
December 21, 1987
Mayor & City Council
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson-, MN
ATTENTION: Mr. Gary Plotz:
We would like a continuation status put on the hearing
for our proposed P.U.D. project to allow us time for further
study and planning.
you.
•
40
We appreciate your cooperation on this matter. Thank
heKoosman
Chief Executive Officer
(612) 587.5151
►TY OF HUTCHINSON
VASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
,HINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 16, 1987
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Koosman & Rice Co.
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
HISTORY
On November 30, 1987, Koosman & Rice Co., submitted an application for a
• conditional use permit to allow construction of a planned unit development of
40-44 units in 4 -unit buildings on property located at 1010 and 1012 Roberts
Road. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, December 15, 1987, at which time there were many
neighboring property owners who objected to the request.
E
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, December 3, 1987.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas Lyke, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
9-d-
• •w
J
(612) 587-5151
• HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCH/NSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December.16, 1987
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
------------------------------
SUBJECT: — spy,SlAERgl'I tLQF3aFLIIIIUU2LAT-UiMLIT LU _LOIoIELI_BBECHT (2 mile radiu
. The Planning Commission recommended to reject the preliminary plat
as submitted subject to receiving recommendation from the DNR on the
flood plain.
0
(612) 587.5151
Hdr�y' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST •
HUTCHh'VSON. MINN 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 16, 1987
i
TO: Planning Commission and City Council✓
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Preliminary Plat of Brecht Riverside
As Submitted by Lowell Brecht (2 mile radius)
I hereby certify that the Preliminary Plat complies with the Subdivision
Ordinance requirements pertaining to "Preliminary Plat" data, except that
the DNR has informed the City, through the Office of the County Zoning
Administrator, that Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision may in part or in
total, be within the floodplain. A Subdivision Agreement providing for •
future improvements and Parks and Playground Contribution will be prepared
prior to Final Plat.
Respectfully submitted,
�
t v1rL L r�
Eugenio Anderson
Director of Engineering
EA/pv
cc: Lowell Brecht
File
40
BRECHT RIVERSIDE Preliminary Plat I
0.
I
1 J
r
OTTER, •LGKE :DRIVE
3]111
—p4
;•a
1- 32 WE
-12 T]
�VS'
LL
r
°
s:
O
/
1
•
n
i
I
N
1
I
I,
1
,
Vj.'
de
0.
I
1 J
r
OTTER, •LGKE :DRIVE
3]111
—p4
;•a
r
�VS'
LL
r
°
s:
O
/
i
I
N
1
I
,
Vj.'
de
C r
/
O
'
H
/
3a
•• b,�-----------------
_
_L
o
•
A
n
r
LYNN
TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH CODE -5 RANGE 30 WEST
ACpAA IPAGE 0 FAR
1
'M33 NM 1 A M MXe N �y ]e •3 HANM)e T�M2e. Y02®TKARM
.�A $ • IIWIY �� } M'ER
MI[H 1.
�.^"'FR r�- 1 G4CrA41Gw-�w LlEMr
KFMETH , 7s+cf
WNEHL • J 162 »«sax .. 2UMLUI s—tM15:OV 68 CK'1
�___;, 156?S ' ]9 1 AI ✓.N.ELBAC��♦� soiLww OTTER
1 ♦�( 9 E MDC Fail) ♦ NOL.[ tUEOTKNFIV EN B GILBERf 5965 _ _ X \
MERE rl CMMA 1
06 ISe r� 202 S ADREr ' •)N/rtNCVSON♦
XOTT '31 ;:UETTMMN
'0 D f ROBERT RLFA B DLAPoA 100 J JOHNSON LAME
Ia95Y ; r60 A FUFAHL 15950 rt0]5 • 124 - 1
a!p'�an �G Q y■1 5. w1L8uR B�iiill 1D C e , i-' ♦ 4 I
E� SAM LFONnFO 19HCLDONTRADE ) aSON Fc'�MRIYN RUSLN I NORMAN 6 tTLE '�6•`, ® \ \
4 !EwES •B JOAN A 9 �.Ti 120 .w vfN0.]PI DONALD S \
CUR1155 J ,J LAAIC.[ �MNM RICHARD CARL
MIB?.
�1 I 190)5, r♦EWH[M nLrt M IIO n I BAl1Mf i1 6 r SXLL I
•A d 16C J�•%' 158 666? �,-- 323 _ X20_ I I BO I, AP[12Y• AC
C
R' I Frn� /s• n 0.i I ^ ] KNNIS
10 ( ROtANo 6 19333 �� MA
[fin^ 1 LARRY 8 EL4'AfiE111 INA sON G
r-- CONNIE .. T46q MCIIARD b F. J B 1 e
RpvnvH (aASEh OELORES ANNE A
r% a.uC.EP I $CI IINJLEP Sy WTNDh0T11 )050 nirr I 3
156 260 ppLLgRlI 262 ` 200 BI IIB.) 5 BD 80 1 50"AA
V-MENBNJGH '� i ENLI1RALEM �N B �T� B LWO L l7 I l A ITT OF 3
1 LILLIAN BA[H "• I iKK AL(RED CIIWiON ♦-
A_1 V 160 I 6D NEEFE ) ® DENNIS ADKR AMR, AIRPOFT- I
���eiC(l`hNC��rppMvp�.MPDB ® L HWB 1 I OLIVFR5 YIN
ALBERTSON II!IµAN+�[
'DAAAZ) JOAN
n R. R AI^.L r.tr ECA[R200C� 1 ��- I SCIIMJD OT395i'T]r 420 B0 ] _ 1601 I 160 15
rMq6j� D B 18MEPLYN b STERU&FTIN ZELLA B 1j 1 ! +cs-_ " 1 ' PHI ( W
RASCjKF MILLERT (;`J RETTMAN i<3 [! f� ••ARSLD 8 IJ.0'DER K R.h�S,
0. SON
Q�6(yF EUA M ]• L (I [quK BO' 6350
1]650 Pl A[NN 2A0 )5 u]"i� •: •'L••r 9 A 2OT !�s^�y' RECWN OGG610A 1
'A 15015 I _ 80 ISO 1 160 ;}',.1 (t. �1 a 160 1 '.E 60
TON y J N 11ss [ � TY B DONALD 1 L DALE Q ;.. IIE<IlaGw I T JUDYKIMBr fl1C11 N n
5[Ie2Rr TXEURING DARLENE "
OL
FLAISANCE !
_ _ ® DERHARD J 8 GCRJME 8 TO K ROBE T B a0 <C' Y SO
CELORES • GLCNNA IW 0 ZELLA ERWIN DL PATM021D AB 15 r CCB C
' OUESTEAnOEFT gEINCR� pMNr irti RETTMAN ®BATH EIN
L E POF HL FF53 EARL b OIKiA MC FORMEK
A€/•y� ! BO sa� ® 120 IAO 88 220 OLSON B� 1s9A0 12
OUYCF 6 ALLEN S It
Q AJ
R2 ! •h�ei- a ECWARD I RRAL I M
J I^1HERFCRTE •x SaO A (REL 82925 KY'"'R B80 SCnMpT 120 I LAPLX 79 `A [T J I79
M Z#C���1� ALD a TO war c a +OHNE 8 .�
'^ y fA.'.r r.�N ( r�` I.ARRIET OTTO ALYAu C"0 NA SHIRLEY NRLETI 1 JOANNE ✓.
R 2` 'FFI12 (b0 •.~yrs EO'EFru�`.YY-`• 80� a ,n :1 t20 i9 15950 .11 ',?. ao aN aIGHT 1 ;M
T ✓jcG EALI 60 s
!: EO (J5 O WPYEY „ORMN
DONALDN J B ` EWENE B;
a y �' I SCMMOT .wuw[f�Il
. L _ RASFV$[N� Su9c[3 P
MARTENS L'TX
JO
1
'SCHMLT If l:• OTTO V ETT NN I'.' I C A.10 BI 1
-0)50 1 Zia 101♦550 2[25 rtl[ I_': Q.
ISO
BO 60� EPN5T 6 '� (A�j LvTun NtgLp r _ 1 L '�^•G5 LE VERN J
HERMAN ZIPF nAL•1NA 1 s LAME 1 l RNN n 9) �iEASM
a UES'ERhCEFTI MARTENS It�NW wursaM e�LL �' r JENSEN
^ ¢ WL.EM- '✓ 160. 590 �` ' UO I••r 9e SFi Mu .6 B01 120
ED
RG 3. ELME 0'TO IJOnN50� ��OUE � • ] ". RICHARD B
160 2 DONALD 2 13
996L `90A 60 170 Ifi0 I 1
_ oro-] 80 120 Ila
�• T
FVPr AR'nUR B � l � — — C STACML
00 0 B ' A
\- RK DEAN I c�� SON CLESEk LYLE 8i ELME9 H w
EJAx3.E 80 1 '`•: ALNE li)' MINXES SERTMA
IM9aY �tiV 80. RANNOW HOMF ¢g t_:
O—� `2�' KPPfEE •. `l -� ]�ARKGWF OLESON r =Le4L J rcr z.
IQ1095 'iL E EST RD /_ 1'333 160 125` KNUTSONI
TR2: IY
ELME 9 � 1� < �N,T •ob+LLG KKAAC
� 255 11 8 "1 • N`AA1
A4i t KNUTSON "LJ BA A'$. N[A[a
19 XSP��T� A E `F MINI[$DT`-� ) )BI INADRGIAL Bo 1 Cao
IAOBENTB'? 19 AL MII!Ee0A 'SO I 0• DEAN ADOLPh b ]9 E u5 --FCe
N"hrE �N`3TTD D [ 3 LYDIA IM 6} KeW [ R
iSTFGICH ! ��.{ ^519 V •AE• �OLE60N �L
60 T9 55 V r 2 rtA t^ •y0 EE Nit 80 �' RiD u]nNa.
COLLINS (PAGE 91 • TAR
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
-_ .. _. __ .. _ c..a♦ ....
A 1—
f M •
■ � - .- 0 IN L m .. • Rin m'
tl �• I
• T j 1
(612) 587.5151
f/U1CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
- HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
•
•
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 16, 1987
T0: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
------------------------------
SUBJECT:_gg$jpEIzgTlDtLQF_pgELltlUpy2LT_FLUiluT-ELB-YB0.iU-aiEMaEN (2 mile radiu-
The Planning Commission recommends approval to City Council with no objection.
STEMSEN ESTATES
0
Dr enwpr ane Wbry Emrrnrm
I
yg�I
Line of flees
•+e. Ane of
rl
_2 of SW 1/4
man ' CasmmPll dranva\'
' I
I Ni
A
A
I
I
12"dra R. C.P =
N end in eer'. 766'`'.
S end inwrr-762'
11
1
1y`\
4
'I
1
4
F ,
�arMr S!%2
.aa 34. 7 r1 ;R30
^sr ,on Momune t)
1 oeswee
r , ✓Iw,min�•T s.,�a�•a .oneu �•r
Seed lings ` f
I ;
I
M Yna" aNMM
I ,
r
--- IB"afa CMP
I 1 •_ .' Was' end mrert. 745'
i I Eau end 'hoary. 7 3.8'
I
I
v lEasy Lne of .esr 20 acres of Su
^� Line parallel wrrh .*or hno of S 1.
I
I I
! \ I
I \ I
y 1 4� \ \ 1
N I
'BLOCK
� I
LOT I
2a'
i
I
i
I
Ih\
A
�Powrr line
l'n .'
l
I 111i ~Po.el pole
I !I Ceaterbno of graral arr.e
I (APProe. 14 'wide gravel surfan)
I
rn li
l \�
1
I,P i
e
• .BENCH MARK:
4J SPrke m south face of power pole.
<e , Elerotmna 1080.91 foot
Keme• A. of ,
a!d vel .."Inc.
' J6" 2,0 = M P
Nr 31 end Aver' 755
,IV end'hilly TQB
Wes' 2�6E79-
o Be --Dedlcu"d -- _
West
IB•dra CAI P
•� North and mart: 74.6
South end /nrelb 74.3'
RI
hE:• enc :e•'. =N
?—F
W37'WASHINGTON
(612) 587.5751
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AVENUE WEST
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
M E M 0
DATE: December 10, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Subdivision Agreement
Siemsen Estates (2 mile radius)
The accompanying Subdivision Agreement pertains to a parcel of property for
which a Preliminary Plat has been submitted. The parcel is located in Acoma
Township, with the two mile radius purview of the Subdivision Ordinance. The
agreement has been submitted to the City Attorney and to the Subdivider for
approval.
• Approval of the Council is respectfully requested.
Respectfully submitted,
Eugene,.Anderson
Director of Engineering
EA/pv
attachment
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SIEMSEN ESTATES
ACOMA TOWNSHIP
CITY OF HUTCBIHSOE, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between Roger Siemsen and Russell Laraway, hereinafter
called the "Subdivider", and the City of Butchinson, a Municipal corporation
in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a tract of land in
the South Half of the Southwest quarter of Section 34, Township 117 North,
Range 30 West, a parcel of which to be known as SIEMSEN ESTATES, which is
located in Acoma Township in McLeod County, Minnesota, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance 464 and 466 requires subdividers to make certain
improvements and park donation in or for the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Subsequent to annexation of SIEMSEN ESTATES into the City, sanitary
sewer mains, sanitary sewer service leads, watermain and water
service leads shall be installed to serve each lot in the
Subdivision. Lateral storm sewer shall be constructed within the
Subdivision to provide adequate drainage of the Subdivision and of
property immediately adjacent thereto. It will be necessary to
grade, construct aggregate base, construct concrete curb and gutter,
and construct a permanent road surface on C.S.A.H. No. 14 in the
Subdivision and on any other streets abutting the Subdivision.
2. It is understood and agreed that the improvements required in
Paragraph No. 1 may be constructed under a single contract or several
contracts and may be completed during several construction seasons.
3. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the sanitary
sewer main system and sanitary sewer service leads for the entire
Subdivision will be under one contract and that part of the
improvement cost will be assessed to the Subdivision.
4. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the watermain
system and water service leads for the entire Subdivision will be
under one contract and that part of the improvement cost will be
assessed to the Subdivision.
5. It is understood and agreed that any cost assessable to the
Subdivision for the extension of the City's sanitary sewer system and
water main system to the Subdivision to serve the Subdivision will be
assessed to the Subdivision.
6. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the lateral
storm sewer system within the Subdivision will be under one contract
and that part of the improvement cost will be assessed to the
Subdivision.
0
•
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SIEMSEN ESTATES
• PAGE 2
7. It is understood and agreed that the improvement of C.S.A.H. No. 14
in the Subdivision and any other street abutting the Subdivision, by
grading and aggregate base, will be under one contract and that part
of the improvement cost will be assessed to the Subdivision.
8. It is understood and agreed that the construction of curb and gutter
on C.S.A.H. No. 14 in the Subdivision and on any other streets
abutting the Subdivision, will be under one contract, and that part
of the improvement cost will be assessed to the Subdivision.
9. It is understood and agreed that the construction of a permanent road
surface on C.S.A.H. No. 14 in the Subdivision and on any other
streets abutting the Subdivision, will be under one contract and that
part of the improvement cost will be assessed to the Subdivision.
10. It is understood and agreed that any trunk storm sewer system that is
constructed by the City that will serve the Subdivision will be
assessed by the City to all properties served by the system. The
SIEMSEN ESTATES SUBDIVISION will be assessed according to the City's
assessment policy for trunk storm sewer systems at the time said
system is built.
• 11. The Subdivider hereby waives all rights to a public hearing and
appeal for the cost of all improvements referenced herein in
Paragraphs 1 through and including 10. The waiving of all such
rights shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns, and successors of the Subdivider.
12. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivision will be required to
make a Parks and Playground Contribution to the City in accordance
with the City's Parks and Playground Contribution Schedule Cost at
the time of annexation. Said payment schedule is for one (1)
dwelling unit per lot. Additional dwelling units per lot will
require an additional payment.
13. Any future re -subdivision into smaller city lots shall require a new
plat and new Subdivision Agreement therefor. Said Agreement shall
include all sections and paragraphs deemed necessary and appropriate
from this agreement.
14. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivision will be used for
residential purposes only. No commercial or industrial land use will
be permitted.
15. It is understood and agreed that no lots can be subdivided into
smaller lots by metes and bounds. Any such subdividing shall be
accomplished in accordance with Paragraph No. 14 hereof.
• 16. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties hereto.
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SIEMSEN ESTATES
PAGE 3
18. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office
at the time the Final Plat is recorded and return a copy of the
recorded agreement to the City Engineer's Office.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said Roger Siemsen and Russell Laraway, have hereunto
set their hands this ` day of , 19_.
Roger Siemsen Russell Laraway
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this _ day of , 19_, by Roger Siemsen.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this ` day of , 19_9 by Russell Laraway.
E
Notary Public, County, Minnesota •
My Commission Expires -
Approved by the City Council on the ` day of , 19_.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument Was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this_day of , 19_, by Paul L.
Acklan, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
G. Barry Anderson
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
101 Park Place •
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Telephone No. (612) 587-7575
Attorney I.D. #1561
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, December 15, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas Lyke at 7:30 p.m. with
the following members present: Marlin Torgerson, Bruce Drahos, Roland
Ebent, Bi 11 Craig, Larry Romo and Chairman Lyke. Absent: Spencer Beytien
Also present: Building Official Jim Marka and Director of Engineering Gene
Anderson.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, November 15, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE/PUO SUBMITTED BY KOOSMAN & RICE CO.
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:32 pm. with the reading of
publication 63762 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
• December 3, 1987. The request is for a con i iona-1use permit to
allow construction of a planned unit development of 40-44 units in 4 -
unit buildings on property located at 1010 and 1012 Roberts Road.
Mr. Larry Rice, Koosman & Rice Co., explained the proposal commenting
on the architecture of the buildings, lanscaping and off-street
parking. He described the covenant and form of management.
Several neighboring property owners were present to voice their
concerns with the development.
Roger Reinhart, 545 Larson, asked what figures "top rental" would be
and if the garages were single car, where would the other cars be
parked. Mr. Rice quoted a figure of possibly $550 for rent and there
would be off-street parking available.
John Paulson, a representative for property owners in Town and Country
Estates, questioned the height of the buildings as to two story or
split level. He also stated concern of property owners with the
density having 40 units in that size area. Mr. Rice explained that
the buildings would be split level and fit in with the surrounding
area.
Phil Bergstrom, 535 Larson, was concerned with the traffic entering on
Roberts Rd. and how the natural landscaping would be affected. He
• also asked about the construction schedule. Mr. Rice stated that the
existing landscaping would be maintained and that the project would be
contructed in one or possibly two phases.
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
12/15/87
Wayne Scott, 525 Larson, was concerned with the height of the •
buildings and entrances into the buildings, the grading of the
terrain and the drainage and the density of population entering onto
Roberts Rd. He is also concerned with the direction of the storm
sewer if it would enter onto Roberts Rd.
Merrill Wendlandt, 555 Larson, has concerns with the fire protection
of that many units and the cul-de-sac. He also mentioned the drainage
problems and that the project does not fit the area.
Discussion followed on the reasons for the PUD and not a rezoning of
the property.
Harlow Stillings, 562 Graham, is concerned with the parking in the
area and the traffic going onto Roberts Rd. Mr. Rice again explained
the plan for off-street parking.
Mr. Rice and Mr. Koosman explained that this type of development
should be placed in a homeowner/residential atmosphere to appeal to
some individuals.
Discussion followed by the planning commission members on their
concerns of the project in that area. The members noted advantages
and disadvantages of the project.
June Redman, Redman Real Estate, questioned the street proposals to •
the south of the property.
Mr. Romo made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Torgerson
the hearing closed at 8:43 pm. Mr. Romo moved to recommend the
request for the conditional use permit be denied. Seconded by Mr.
Ebent the motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
5. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY LOWELL BRECHT (2 mile
radius)
City Engineer, Gene Anderson commented on a letter to the County
Zoning Administrator from the DNR regarding the fact that the plat
appears to be partially in the 100 yr. flood plain. County Zoning
Administrator Homan recommends that lot 2 not be part of the develop-
ment until the 100 yr. flood plain is determined.
Mr. Torgerson moved to reject the preliminary plat as submitted •
subject to receiving recommendation from the DNR on the flood plain.
Seconded by Mr. Drahos the motion carried unanimously.
2
MINUTES - PLANNING COMMISSION - 12/15/87
• (b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT AS SUBMITTED BY ROGER SIEMSEN (2
mile radius)
Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat
with no objection to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion
carried unanimously.
(c) DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUBMITTED BY STAFF
The Planning Commission had favorable comment on the options chosen by
the staff and directed Building Official, Jim Marka to contact the
firm of BRW to make a presentation on those options at the January
meeting.
(d) REVIEW PARK CONTRIBUTIONS FOR APARTMENT DWELLINGS AS REQUESTED BY
DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING GENE ANDERSON
Director of Engineering, Gene Anderson commented on the possibility of
updating the Park Contribution schedule specifically in regard to
multiple dwelling units. Mr. Anderson stated that parks and
playgrounds would potentially be used more by families living in this
type of housing.
Mr. Ebent recommended that staff revise the fee scale of the
contribution scheduling. City Engineer Anderson was directed to check
. on the land values and possibly how park contributions are addressed by
other cities the size of Hutchinson.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF A MEAT MARKET/BUTCHER SHOP BUSINESS REQUESTED BY GRANT
AND LUANN HATTEN AND MARK SING
Mr. Hatten explained the type of business he would be operating having
both retail and private butchering. He stated that there would not be
a large amount of animals per week being slaughtered and that the
USDA would be inspecting the operation frequently. The building would
be required to meet USDA standards. Mr. Hatten also explained that
the animals, for the most part, would be butchered immediately. He
mentioned that there would be a need for a 4'x4' smoke house that
would create a minor amount of odor.
Building Official Marka questioned if this business would need a
conditional use permit and was directed by the planning commission
to contact City Attorney, Barry Anderson as to what permits are
necessary for this type of business in a C-3 zone.
7. ADJOURMENT
• There being no futher business the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
3
(612) 587.5151
• H�rcH'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
14UTrHINSON 'V WN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 17, 1987
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Marilyn Swanson, Administrative Secretary
SUBJECT: Joint Meeting with Hospital Board
------------------------------
. The Hospital Board would like to hold a joint meeting with the City Council
to hear a presentation on multi hospital affiliations.
0
The suggested date is Tuesday, January 19, 1988, with dinner at 6:00 P.M.,
followed by a meeting. Both would be held at the hospital.
Prior to the Council/Hospital Board meeting, the Board will be meeting with
the County Commissioners, who will also join the Council for dinner.
(612) 587-5151
• ;va�cy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, M/NN 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 18, 1987
TO: Mayor& City Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
— ------------------ — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: Annual Wage Adjustment And Limiti g Merit — — — — — — _ — —
The annual wage adjustment I recommend is two percent (2%).
• Secondly, I would recommend limiting the over-all merit average within any de-
partment to a figure of not to exceed ,x..25% of payroll. This means some indi-
viduals may get zero or some a maximum of 2%, however the overall average
would not exceed 1.25%, excluding employees under mid -point.
In comparison locally, we understand that the Utilities Commission agreed to
a 3.25% increase (second year of contract) and the hospital employees will
receive 2% plus approximately 1% (merit or longevity) for a total in the
area of 3%.
•
I have been asked to check on what 3M may do in 1988; however, this determin-
ation we understand will not be made until March 1988. In regards to Hutchin-
son Technology, we understand there probably will be some wage adjustments;
however, no decision has been made.
I do intend to meet with several City employee groups to advise them of the
process and my recommendation(s). This will provide opportunity for comment;
however, some may attend the Council meeting on their own accord.
Marlin and I will be meeting with the liquor store employees late Mondav
afternoon. In view of the fact many (4) of these employees are in high levels
within their grade (level 6 and up), we will be discussing freezing wages or
maybe these individuals may have a better idea or alternative.
/ms
FCCITY
12) 587-5151
OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
-'_'IVINN 55350
DECEMBER 13, 1987
TOc GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROMa KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECTS PAYROLL COSTS FOR 1987
-------------------------------------------------------------
The following adjustments were made to the payroll in 1987 by
fund.
Cost Cost MERIT ADJUSTMENTS
0
1987 total general fund eupeitures for cost of living and merit adjustments are
$55.211
1987 Contingency dollars in the General Fund were $130,000
1988 Contingency dollars in the General Fund are $130,000.
r�
U
�--T
of
Merit
Living
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr Total
GENERAL FD
$42,196
$4,843 $5,164
$29562
$446 $13,0150
WATER/SEWER
3.926
549 19315
606
- 29473
LIQUOR
2,886
- -
286
- 286
CENTRAL GARAGE
594
- -
142
- 142
Dollars reflect wages
and FICA/PERA cost
to city.
1987 total general fund eupeitures for cost of living and merit adjustments are
$55.211
1987 Contingency dollars in the General Fund were $130,000
1988 Contingency dollars in the General Fund are $130,000.
r�
U
�--T
(612) 587.5151
/TY OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
,HINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 21, 1987
TO: — Gari Plotz, City Administrator
FROM: Randy DeVries, Director of Water and Wastewater
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Cost of living and merit increase --------------------------
The staff of the water department and the staff of the
wastewater treatment plant have reviewed your recommendation
on cost of living and merit increases. We all feel that the
is
increase is fair.
RD/ds
(612) 587-5151
HUTCH• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
Decenber 22, 1987
MEMORANDUM
•.• r• •w • 04 u••• N ks)
•: • • •a ,e1D
i have checked with local employers concerning 1988 wage adjustments.
3m Carpany - John Bergerson, Personnel Manager
Traditionally any adjustment for hourly a plcyees is made in late
March. There has been no discussion and no decision regarding
• 1988 at this time. Any information otherwise is based on rumor only.
Goebel Fixture Co. - Virgil Goebel
Production employees will begin the 3rd year of a 3 -year contract
in June, 1988. Adjustment for them at that time will be 3%.
Office arra administrative enplcyees received an adjustment to be
effective January 1, 1988. He requests that the amount not be
publicised.
HTI - Denise Gabel
(Not available until Dec. 23.)
I-
L-1
q --z-
• HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE December 16, 1987
•
TO Gary Plotz
FROM Ron Kirchoff
SUBJECT Request to place following items on the Council Agenda for 12-22-87
I would like to place the following items on the Council Agenda for,12-22-87.
I would like the Council to approve the plan that has been previously discussed
by the Council and myself, that is, to have our 1985 Ford (Squad 4) painted a
neutral color (preferably light blue) and designated as the unmarked squad to be
utilized by the Chief of Police.
Secondly, I would like authorization to begin the process of purchasing a
1988 vehicle to be utilized as a squad car for the City of Hutchinson.
9_s
• HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE I2-8-87
Mayor & City Council
Ron Kirchoff
SUBJECT Purchase Replacement Equipment
I would like to purchase four hand-held tape recorders to replace the
recorders that the department has purchased approximately 10 years ago. For
your information the four models that were purchased are not in working order.
Of the four that were purchased one is still in use, that one being very poor
quality. The three other models are sitting in a desk drawer and cannot be
repaired. Along with the four hand-helds I would like to replace the four
transcriber recorders that are used by our clerical people in the day to day
operations of the police department. Again the City had purchased three
transcribers some ten years ago. Of the three one is in working condition. I
would like to purchase four transcribers as there is a need to have four units
within the police department clerical section.
Ten years ago the Hutchinson Police Department started using tape
recorders and transcribers on a daily basis. It was felt at that time that
due to the volume of the reports that were being generated, the use of tape
• recorders would allow officers more time to be on patrol. Since then the use
of the tape recorder has become even more apparent. In areas of statements,
detailed reports on the crime scene, use of memos from administrative staff,
the list could go on and on. I'm sure people in your position in professional
fields have also come to realize the use of tape recording equipment is not
only idean but a necessity to complete the ever growing paper jungle that
society has created for itself. As you will note I am not ordering new
equipment, simply replacing obsolete and unusable equipment that has been
purchased by the City in years past. I have enclosed for your review two
quotations from Marco Business Products with a quoted price of $1,830.00; a
second one from Wally Pikal Music Store for $1,440.00 and this one will be
less as the tradeins are not figured on Pikal's estimate. I would recommend
going with Wally Pikal Music Store, not only for the fact that he is low
bidder but he has provided information relating to service where we would not
be billed for mileage on our service calls. For your information I did list
$1,100.00 for new equipment in the 1988 budget request. I would respectively
request you review the need at your earliest possible convenience.
Respectively,
R. Kirchoff
P.S. As I have finalized this memo it has been brought to my attention that
the fourth transcriber is no longer working, so we have no transcribing
• equipment.
WALLY PIKAL MUSIC STORE
" # L" DopW, owner
147 S. Main St.TCHINSON. MN 55350
Phan . 7.3291
A finance charge of I%% per month -1g% per annum is applied
to the balance over 30 days. Min. charge of $1.00.
All a and returned pooch
30948 C
MUST
be bs accompanied by this bell.
ne fit"J �.w ,ws 01471 .
0
0
Messer®�
url�t
w�
`��
®_
TNN
_1
_MM
_PAP
All a and returned pooch
30948 C
MUST
be bs accompanied by this bell.
ne fit"J �.w ,ws 01471 .
0
0
MARCO 111UNWN MOCUCTf
3000 OIWNon str"
• P.O.Bos
St. g
. oue.MlnnMols SM
TNphon.: (6121261.7000
MN Toll Fns: 1-8004W-854
December 2, 1987
Hutchinson Police Department
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attention: Roger, Purchasing Agent
Dear Roger:
This letter is in regards to our conversation last Tuesday regarding your
dictation needs.
You have asked me to give you a quotation on three microcassette transcribers
and four microcassette hand helds. The hand helds have the two features you are
looking for which are conference and dictate mode and also the lock feature so
they will not turn on when they are not in use.
• The dote for this equipment is as follows:
PRICE TOTAL
EACH PRICE
3 - Dictaphone Microcassette Transcribers $495.00 $1,485.00
($595.00 Each List Price)
3 - Dictaphone Microcassette Hand Halos 195.00 585.00
Model 3232
I - Hand Held Exchanged for a New Hand Held NIC NIC
Less Trade of one Thoughtmaster 1880 (240.00)
dictaphone, one Dictaphone hand held, one
Norelco transcriber and one Norelco hand held
TOTAL INVESTMENT: $1,830.00
This quotation is in effect until December 24, 1987. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me at 1-800-892-8548.
Sincerely,
Steve Hary
Marco Business Products
SH/ph
SH1202.1
q, A
/An Enusl Ootunitr Emolovsr
om
IP' (612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
DECEMBER 17, 1987
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-----------------------------------
SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT RECORDING EQUIPMENT
------------------------------------------------------------
Attached is a breakdown of the contingency account for 1987.
Money would be available for this purchase in contingency.
This equipment has been budgeted contingent on available surplus
in 1988. Since the total breakdown of all equipment the need
becomes immediate.
There should be sufficient monies in the 1987 budget to allow for
this purchase.
Cost of the equipment is $1,440 less any trade in value.
•
11
0
0
•
1672 587-5157
yarcH'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
DECEMBER 18, 1987
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: GENERAL FUND CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT
Our budget for 1987 contains an unallocated amount of $130,000
Following is a break down of the money used to this point
TOTAL BUDGETED $130,000
Cost of Living 429196
MERIT
1st quarter 49843
2nd quarter 59164
3rd quarter 2,562
4th quarter 446
Jaycee Contribution 19000
House Demolition 445
Acting Chief wage 19512
Police Chief Settle 449635
C. Bailly audit 19000
PHP contract renewal 49189
Picnic 965
Police Dept Terminal 626
OTHER
TOTAL $109,583
AMOUNT REMAINING $20,497
Because of the illness & retirement in the Motor Vehicle
Department budget will be over
Because of needed additional use of parttime and overtime
police budget will be over
City Council asked for a reserve of $5,000 for 1988
ordinance codification.
0
December 17, 1987
To: Paul Ackland, Mayor
City Council, City of Hutchinson
The State of Minnesota (Department of Transportation) has recommended
that MM line from Hutchinson to Wayzata receive assistance through the
Minnesota State Rail Plan for rehabilitation and also assistance for
acquisition cost of the railroad property from BN.
Before assistance can be granted by the State of Minnesota, DAKR
and/or McLeod County Rail Authority must "pay off" the Contract for Deed
with BN.
Negotiations with BN have resulted in substantial discount of the
purchase price. A payment of $900,000.00 must be made to BN on or before
December 31, 1987, to realize the discount.
The State of Minnesota requires the following:
• (1) McLeod Rail Authority acquire the legal title to real
estate from BN, with a subsequent sale of the same
property to DAKR.
(2) State will not provide funds for acquisition (approximately
$500,000.00) without or unless there is "local matching".
State has agreed that local matching of $200,000.00 by
responsible local parties (private and municipal) payable
$20,000.00 per year is acceptable.
(a) Matching funds would be used to subsidize interest
cash of private financing or rehabilitation. Local
matching funds and State participation would secure
their grant with a lion in railroad right-of-way.
Grant (principal only) would be repayable only in the
event rail transportation ceases.
At a recent meeting of the McLeod Rail Authority, it was decided the
following request for local participation should be as follows:
0
Page #2
December
17, 1987
(1)
Lester's (Butler) -
$ 50,000.00
(2)
3M -
50,000.00
(payable in ten
(3)
Hercules -
25,000.00
equal installments -
(4)
McLeod County -
25,000.00
commencing in
(5)
City of Hutchinson -
25,000.00
December of 1988)
(6)
City of Lester Prairie -
25,000.00
$2000000.00
The purpose of McLeod Rail Authority and DAKR request to appear before
the City Council is to obtain a commitment from the City for a "Grant" of
$25,000.00.
History:
There are forty-four (44) miles of railroad right-of-way from
Hutchinson to Wayzata with approximately six (6) miles of track in
Hutchinson (13'x% of total track is located in Hutchinson).
Approximately $1,800,000.00 has already been spent on the line for
rehabilitation. Most of the rehabilitation has been done with private
funds of DAKR.
As soon as the acquisition is completed, a Grant for rehabilitation of
$1.1 million will be finalized.
Federal Funds - $ 609,280.23
State funds - 143,727.70
DAKR participation - 215,145.00
Shippers loan - 107,572.00
$1,075,724.93
It is anticipated that it will take another $3.5 million to complete
the rehabilitation. The State of Minnesota has indicated that additional
grants or low interest loans will be available. "Local matching" will not
be required for subsequent rehabilitation grants or loans.
Usage of the railroad has met Jerry Ross' original projections.
Shippers have became comfortable with the idea that the railroad is here to
stay. Les Foreman of Lester's indicated in a presentation to the McLeod
County Commissioners that service has been great and rates on freight have
made their Company more competitive in the market place. It has meant jobs
for 10-20 additional employees at Lester's.
Mr. Jim Browne, Rail Program Manager of DOT, stated that if rail •
service was discontinued betvwn Hutchinson and Wayzata, Hutchinson would
be the lasyest City in the State of Minnesota vithout rail service.
•
•
•
MINUTES D R A F T
MCLEOD REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 1091987
Members Present:
Sheldon Nies, Chairman
Leslie Forman, vice Chair
John Bernhagen, Secy-Treas.
Anchor Nelsen
Howard Christensen
Milo Kubasch
Dean Oleson
Larry Graf
Others Present:
Ron McGraw, Attorney
Jerry Rosa, Dakota Rail
Michael Ross, Dakota Rail
Plotz, City
Hazel Sitz, City
Jim Browne, MN/DOT
Barb Kauppa, 314, St. Paul
Leader reporter
Chairman Sheldon Nies called the meeting to order at 10 a.m. in the Citizens
Bank Community Room.
Minutes of the meeting of May 149 1987, were read and approved on a motion by
Howard Christensen, seconded by Milo Kubasch and carried unanimously.
Ron McGraw summarized the status of discussions which have been held
concerning early acquisition of the rail property from BN. BN would accept
$900,000 in calendar year 1987 in full payment for right of way and leased
property in the communities along the track. This is a very favorable price.
Jia Browne reported that the State prefers the purchase now by Dakota Rail so
that BN would have no future interest or rights in the property in the event
of any default. The State can provide a grant of $4509000 to $500,000.
To accomplish the purchase now, the Rail Authority must take an active part in
seeing that $200,000 over a 10 year period be secured as hard match for the
State grant. Private loans could make up the balance of the match. Contingent
upon the purchase, the State has also approved a rehabilitation grant of $1.1
million. The property has already been considerably upgraded by Jerry
Ross/Dakota Rail and the rehabilitation is ahead of schedule.
Discussion by the group indicated that it is consistent with the original
goals of the Rail Authority to pursue the purchase as has been discussed.
MOTION was made by John Bernhagen, seconded by Les Forman and carried
unanimously that the Rail Authority pursue funding from various public and
private entities for up to $209000 per year for a 10 year period to match the
State funds.
It was suggested that the cities of Hutchinson and Lester Prairie and the
county of McLeod each be asked to provide $2500 a year for 10 years as the
local match. 3M would be asked for $5000, Lesters $5000 and Hercules $2500
per year for the same period.
MOTION was made by Larry Graf, seconded by Ancher Nelsen and carried
unanimously that the McLeod Regional Rail Authority accept ownership of all
property from Burlington Northern with immediate transfer to Dakota Rail, with
the Regional Rail Authority holding contingent interest, all subject to review
of final documents.
The meeting was recessed at 11:15 a.m. to b6 reconvened on Wedneoday,
Dsoember 23, 1967, at 10 a.m. at the mate location.
DAWD D. AA"M
SASLSS S. Ci &C"NL
D. LOXAJKOWz= N
D. BeD07161L
PArt BN07IL6s
STSVON A. ANDBSSON
O. DASST ANDBaSON
STSV1W S. BOOB
CU -Sias L.DAIL,JB.
DANIEL J. 32S6N6
"VBA B. PSDTLAIID
DA%0 A. DDOBOOB!(AN11
JOS"" M. PAX6 NB
December 3, 1987
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ArroRNzTs AT LAw
Basi CanAa Iran Roan
MIxxBArOL19, MlxxasarA 55416
W12) 545-9000
MN ToLL Faaa eoo-343.4545
GASLz1 MCLAW MIxmaArous
TSLDCOPIBD, 40M) 546.1760
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: S & L Building Tax Increment Project
(Now 101 Park Place)
Dear Gary:
Om SOOTS 100118 sTBaST
PSINCBTON, BDD1S6Or M On
714 rsNTB STUSST aur
OLBNOOB, NINN6SOTA 66006
roam mG-MD
101 PASS PLACS
BVMBINSON, BDDIBSMA 66060
bNN 657.7070
As you know, the above -referenced matter was raised under "other
business" at the last city council meeting, and at the request of
the council, was deferred to the next regularly scheduled city
council meeting, December 8, 1987. This letter will serve as, I
hope, at least a partial summary of the issues involved in the
dispute between the City of Hutchinson and the principal developer,
Hutch S & L Rehab., which is apparently a partnership.
There are basically two issues that will ultimately require a deci-
sion by the council.
The first issue to dispose of is rather straight -forward. During
the first year of the operation of the facility, a shortfall was
experienced in the tax account between projections and receipts
regarding the 101 Park Place Building. The developer, Miller,
Miller & Mac, Was billed on a regular basis for collection of
this item and has declined to pay it, contending that it is not
owed for reasons set out below. In response to the failure to pay
the amounts described, acting on the advice of the prior city
attorney, the city council chose to certify the amount to the taxes
covering the parcel of property now known as 101 Park Place.
0
9- //,) 1
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
December 3, 1987
Page 2
Both the developer and the principal local lending institution,
Citizens Bank & Trust Company, have approached the city requesting
that the amount be decertified on the grounds that the city does
not have the authority to certify the allegedly deficient amount
to the auditor for the purpose of placing the deficiency on the
tax rolls.
As a general rule, the city must have either statutory or ordinance
authority to certify amounts to the tax rolls. For example, the
basic Hutchinson municipal sewer and water ordinance does provide
that the city shall have the authority to certify amounts repre-
senting unpaid invoices to the tax rules. Another example is found
in Chapter 429 dealing with special assessments which gives the
city certain rights to assess some types of service fees to the tax
rolls.
•
There does not appear to be any clear statutory authority, and
there certainly is no municipal ordinance that addresses this
question, that would allow for the certification of this amount to
the auditor for placement on the tax statement. Under those cir-
cumstances, it would be my recommendation that the city council
decertify amounts previously certified for discrepancies between
projections and receipts insofar as 101 Park Place is concerned. .
This does not mean that the city will be unable to collect the
amounts allegedly owing but it does mean that the city will not be
able to use tax forfeiture as an enforcement mechanism.
The second issue is somewhat more complicated and the council need
not take official action on this issue at this time. This issue
concerns an interpretation of Section 5.02 of the sale and develop-
ment agreement relating to Development District Number 4. Section
5.02 as approved and executed provids "it is estimated that the
principal of and interest on the bonds will come due on the date
specified... and the developer agrees to pay to the city at the
times and subject to the limitations herein provided, the amount
needed in addition to the tax increment to be derived from the ;
district, and any interest earnings thereon available to the city,
to pay the principal of and interest on the developer's bonds when
due." (emphasis added). Put in its simpliest form, the developer
is contending that as long as the district shows a positive cash
flow, the developer cannot be responsible for the shortfall
occuring with respect to the building. To give you a flavor of
what this dispute is all about, I have included in this correspon-
dence a letter received from Miller, Miller a Mac, Inc. dated
September 1, 1987 and I have asked the City Administrator to also
include with the council material a copy of Jerome Gilligan's
letter dated May 21, 1987.
0
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
December 3, 1987
Page 3
As noted above, no action is necessary on the second issue at this
time. Under the circumstances and with an eye to cooperation with
the principal lending institution and the developer, it is my
recommendation that the shortfall be decertified.
Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. If I have not
adequately explained the issues or if additional information is
required, I would be happy to provide it.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARMOLD & MCDOwELL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA/lh
• Enc.
cc: Mr. Jerome Gilligan
Mr. Patrick Stallman
i
L
�Cr OF HUTCHINSON
Es
M E M 0
DATE: December 17, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Surface Determination for T.H. 7 East Improvements
The Minnesota Department of Transportation has requested input from the City
regarding our preferrence of pavement surface on the upcoming T.H. 7 East
project. The improvements entail widening the roadway pavement to 52 feet and
constructing a section of urban design with concrete curb and gutter and
driveway aprons. Project limits would be approximately the railroad crossing
by Rockite Silo on the west, and the corporate limits on the east.
• originally, construction on the project was scheduled to begin in about
September 1988, but concerns by MN/DOT about a late starting date have led them
to consider a 1990 construction project. However, delaying the project for two
years could result in a loss of funding, and ultimate construction being
delayed even further.
Attached is correspondence between this office and %tN/DOT regarding scheduling.
A 1989 project on T.H. 7, as we have requested MN/DCT to consider, hinges upon
MN/DOT finding an acceptable detour, since T.H. 22 reconstructionis,.also,
scheduled for 1989.
As for whether the new roadway surface on T.H. 7 would be asphalt or concrete,
MN/DOT has informed the City that no cost in addition to what the municipality
would normally pay will be incurred by the City as a result of choosing one type
of surfacing over the other. To maintain uniformity with the balance of T.H. 7
in the city, we recommend requesting concrete pavement.
An approximate estimate of the City's share of the Project cost is 5270,000,
which could be defrayed with Federal Aid Urban and Municipal State Aid funds,
aad assessments. More Precise cost estimates will be provided by MN/DOT as
desicn progresses.
Respectfully submitted,
4
Eugene Anderson.
Director of Engineering
dA�hments p/�;
ry ..
ro12) W7-5151
ITY Of HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
December 8, 1987
Mr. Patrick Hughes
District Engineer
Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
P. O. Box 768 '
2505 Transportation Road
Willmar, MN 56201
Dear Mr. Hughes:
Thank you for keeping the City apprised of the proposed construction schedule
on T.H. 7 East, T.H. 15 South, and on T.H. 22 in the southeast part of the
City. We are informed *cork on T.R. 1S is scheduled for 1988, probably
beginning in June, while T.R. 7 would be reconstructed in late 1988 and T.H.
22 in 1989. The intention in the case of the latter two highways is to use
one as the detour route while the other is being reconstructed.
With regard to the T.R. 7 project, during our meeting on November 30th, it was •
explained that MN/DOT is comtesplating rescheduling the project to possibly
1990 to avoid fallconstruction. While I too am concerned about potential
problems with late construction due to unpredictable weather conditions, the
City is concerned that rescheduling construction to 1990 may result in a loss
of funding and the project being postponed indefinitely. In an effort of
realizing reconstruction of T.R. 7 before 1990, the City respectfully suggests
that the 1988 schedule be maintained, or that.both the T.H. 7 and the T.R. 22
projects be constructed in 1989. If both projects were to be constructed
concurrently, a suggested detour, as shown on the enclosed map, is via T.R. 261,
T. H. 212 and T.R. 15, with a secondary detour via C. S. A. R. 4, C. R. 79 and T. B.
15.
The City would appreciate consideration and response as to the feasibility of
this suggestion.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
cl(it;tl t V;
Eugen Anderson
Direcor of Engineering
CC: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator !-
9er .r,acen, Exec. Dir., E' ==hin`-Cr. Comm -;c... Oeve:OCTe.
01~14ESOra
10
\lllln�'�I I(,i
• a UeE���runrnt ut Triinsp(mauc>n
sox 769
kyr Ng 2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
OC TP.> WILLMAR MINNESOTA 5e LJ'
December 14, 1987
Eugene Anderson
Director of Engineering
City of Mitchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, M 55350
Dear W. Anderson:
Thank you for taking the time to write a letter expressing the city's concern
over the possible rescheduling of the construction on T.H. 7 from 1988 to 1990,
and for giving us some suggested detours.
In a follow up conversation, you made us aware that using T.H. 15 in downtown
• Mitchinson during 1989 would interfere with construction Mitchinson has
planned for water main replacement. In the next couple of weeks, we will
follow up on your detour suggestions.
The future progress on T.H. 7 hinges on finding an acceptable detour and our
abilities to complete all the project development requirements. We will keep
you informed if there are any changes in the contract letting date for T.H. 7.
Again, thank you for your suggestions ano expressing your concerns.
Sincerely,
Patrick C. MUghes
District Engineer
JWH: PCH: dkb
N. G. GieseK?
9. i. Si eck
J. W. He��siin
0
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*PERA
employer contribution
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
*Withhold TAx Account
December 22, 1987
79.31
WATER & SEWER FUND
due to 186 audit
156.00
.
*U.S. Postmaster
postage for meter
$ 73.54
Dec. life ins.
*PERA
employer contribution
266.74
169.71
*Withholding Tax Acct.
employer contribution
448.75
Borchert Ingersoll Inc.
Amex
Dec. LTD ins.
32.28
2 mirrors
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
Dec. life ins.
28.83
61.50
Physicians Health Plan
Dec. medical ins.
1078.32
Big Bear
SunLife of Canada
Dec. dental ins.
109.96
parts
Big Bear
supplies
14.99
601.14
Electric Motor Co.
motor repairs
88.06
• ManQueen Equipment
Plowmans Inc.
Hutch Iron & Metal
iron
4.00
parts
J.W. Hanson Co.
sidewalk & curb & gutter
1217.50
46.98
Mn. Valley Testing
testing
68.00
Logis
computer charges
704.20
RCM
professional services
2095.55
Town & Country Tire
repairs
5.00
Wigen Chev. Co.
� ton truck
9548.00
Water Products
meter & parts
89.06
Motor VEhicle
sales tax & reg. & plates
589.00
Diane Olsen
seminar
6.79
General Repair Service
supplies
14.53
Hansen Gravel Inc.
stockpiling gravel
637.50
Mn. Pollution Control AGency
registration fees
120.00
Arcon Construction Co.
construction costs
15,092.42
R. L. Carr Co.
construction costs
774,621.00
General Fund
due to per " 86 audit
29,538.00
$ 836,492.02
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*PERA
employer contribution
$ 47.14
*Withhold TAx Account
employer contribution
79.31
Water & Sewer Fund
due to 186 audit
156.00
Amex Life Assurance Co.
Dec. ltd ins.
7.25
Mn. Mutual Life Ins. Co.
Dec. life ins.
6.82
Physicians Health Plan
Dec. medical ins.
169.71
Sun Life of Canada
Dec. dental ins.
24.26
Borchert Ingersoll Inc.
parts
10.65
Champion Auto Stores
2 mirrors
19.98
Mankato Mack Sales
parts
61.50
Snap on Tools
repairs
76.95
Big Bear
parts
89.98
INTERSTATE Diesel Products
parts
15.64
Jerabek Machine Shop
repair snowbucket
601.14
MTI Dist. Co.
supplies
70.41
• ManQueen Equipment
Plowmans Inc.
parts
parts
84.00
507.79
Swanke Motors Inc.
parts
120.15
Shopko
parts
46.98
Wigen Chev.
repairs & parts
219.41
2,415.07
11 �4
-2 -
GENERAL FUND
*Withhold Tax Account
employer contribution
$3205.11
*Dept. of Natural Resources
snowmobile reg. fees
162.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
76.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
121.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
ORV registration fees
112.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
127.00
*DEPT. OF Natural Resources
snowmobile registration fees
16.00
*Dept. of Natural Resources
boat registration fees
130.00
*U.S. Postmaster
postage for meter
390.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
ORV registration fees
58.00
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
130.00
*Dept. of Natural Resources
snowmobile reg. fees
298.00
*PERA
employer contribution
3673.58
*McLeod Coop Power Assn.
airport electricity
349.70
*Credit Trust of Orville Lund
easement $ agreement
3801.00
Dick Kuttner
expenses
5.50
Marsha Theis
overpayment refund
12.00
Bruce Santelman
refund !� wine license
250.00
Barb Bening
refund
15.00
Susie Decker
skating refund
11.00
Jerilyn Breitkreutz
skating refund
23.00
Pat Buytaert
double payment refund
12.00
Joleen Runke
seminar
6.79
Mary Vieryra
reimbursement
12.00
Mary Rutz
skating overpayment
11.00
Nancy Schwarze
skating overpayment
24.00
• Randy Exsted
basketball official
135.00
Paul Linder
b asketball official
135.00
Bernie Schepers
tour refund
14.00
Harold Juul
tour refund
14.00
Lil Ahlstrom
tour refund
14.00
Viola Klukas
tour refund
20.00
Paul Ackland
mileage & meal
39.17
Allied Mechanical Systems
repairs
240.00
Crystaplex Plastics Inc.
supplies
85.00
Chanhassen Dinner Theatre
46 tickets
1035.00
Cargill Salt
deicing salt
660.06
Clareys Safety Equipment
equipment
66.25
Com. of Transportation
star city signs
355.00
Dodd Technical Corp.
office supplies
31.84
Good News Unlimited
sun catchers
30.68
General Indicator Corp.
repairs
134.22
Hansen Gravel
stockpiling gravel
1462.50
Karen Shaws Fitness Studio
senior fitness class
72.00
Kargs Kustom Kampers
disc rental
45.00
Mn. Pollution Control AGency
certification exam
15.00
Mn. Pollution Control Agency
registration fees
50.00
Mikes Mobil
blade
13.99
Natl Soc. of Prof. Eng.
dues
166.00
Party Place USA
supplies
37.77
Prentice Hall
soils & foundations book
38.74
Priority I realty
double payment refund
2.00
. Safety Council
per 1987 budget
150.00
Hutch Rec. Center
gym rental
18,495.00
Civic Arena
ice time for skating
3,937.50
-3 -
Ag Systems Inc.
supplies
5.00
Amex Assurance Co.
Dec. LTD ins.
599.72
Amoco Oil Co.
gasoline
31.42
Arnold & McDowell
legal fees for Dec.
2358.92
Browns Floral
funeral arrangement & supplies
31.90
Big Bear
supplies
19.08
Bennett Office Supplies
service maint. contract
19.21
Ben Franklin Crafts
supplies
13.89
Central Garage Fund
bal. of 1987 vehicle rental
7002.00
Chamber of Commerce
dec. secretarial
180.00
Copy Equipment
supplies
101.55
Co. Treasurer
dl fees
92.50
County Market
nov. supplies
78.26
Culligan Water Cond.
monthly service
14.00
Dons Foods
supplies
12.83
Display Sales Inc.
decoration supplies
557.20
Doug Jost
energy services $ mileage
446.28
Co. Recorder
recording fees
112.00
Eileen Goeders
contract payment
1500.00
E -Z Sharp Inc.
supplies
46.23
Felskas
supplies
3.50
Gopher Sign
sign
473.41
G F Nemitz Sons
supplies
30.80
George Field
registration fees
9.00
Hager Jewelry
UPS charges
2.73
Hutch Com. Hospital
laundry
4.95
•
Hutch Leader
arena ads
63.45
Hutch Utilities
6 bulbs
120.00
Hutch Utilities
insurance refund
11,697.23
Hutch Fire $ Safety
services
161.50
Ind. School Dist 423
bldg. supervisor
78.00
Johnson Radio Com.
repairs
52.50
Jerabek Machine Shop
repairs
43.84
Juul Contracting
repairs & services
765.00
Joes Sport Shop
plates
6.00
J.W. Hanson Const. Co.
repairs of sidewalk
150.00
K Mart
supplies
23.88
L $ P Supply Co.
repairs & supplies
24.05
Logis
computer charges
3532.06
Marco Bus. Products
repairs
92.88
Mn. Mutual Life Ins. Co.
Dec. life ins.
486.70
Mankato Bus. Products
service contract
45.00
Motorola Inc.
quarterly billing
807.90
Midwest Bus. Products
office supplies
337.81
Mn. Elevator Inc.
elevator service
53.55
Mn. Rec. $ Park Assn.
labels
53.69
McGarvey Coffee
coffee police
116.25
Northwestern Bell
leased phone line
326.50
Northern STate Supply
supplies
10.39
Peterson Bus Service
coach rental
570.00
Physicians Health Plan
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp.
Dec. medical ins.
mail mach/scale
11,112.15
102.00
Rutz Plbg $ Htg.
supplies
27.95
R $ R Specialties Inc.
supplies
230.00
Schlueters Ref.
repairs
34.50
Shopko
supplies
56.05
9
•
•
-4-
Simonson Lbr.
Sun Life of Canada
Tombstone Pizza Corp.
UBC
Viking Signs
West Pub. Co.
Wm. Mueller $ Sons
supplies
Dec. dental ins.
supplies
supplies
signs
supplements to books
street materials
10.81
1596.36
42.00
266.78
330.00
239.50
361.26
$ 88,300.32
•
•
-5-
POLICE CONSTRUCTION FUND
Thorbeck $ Lambert Inc.
professional services
$2977.87
C.A.M.
construction mgement fee
11,484.83
•
West Side Plbg $ Htg.
construction costs
32,445.00
E.J. Pinske Bldrs
construction costs
19,800.00
E & T Contracting Co.
construction costs
2111.89
Allied Mechanical Systems
construction costs
13,664.00
McNerney Ind.
construction costs
13,858.00
Nystrom Inc.
construction costs
630.00
Bladholm Bros.
construction costs
1097.00
Peters Construction
construction costs
7965.00
Schatz Construction Inc.
construction costs
24,507.00
Spring Valley Overhead Door Co.
construction costs
2642.40
Straughn Hardware Co.
construction costs
15,516.00
Trussbilt
construction costs
3276.00
$ 151,974.99
1984 Parking Bonds
General Fund, City Hutchinson
due to per '86 audit
2615.36
Parking Bonds of 1981
due to per 186 audit
17,678.50
Bonds of 1986
Bonds of 1985
due to per '86 audit
432.19
Bonds of 1985
Bonds of 1982
due to
34,000.00
Bonds of 1981
due to per 186 audit
450.36
•
Bonds of 1984
Bonds of 1983
due to per 186 audit
118.00
Bonds of 1976
due to per 186 audit
1,913.57
Bonds of 1983
Bonds of 1976
due to per 186 audit
876.62
Bonds of 1979
due to per 186 audit
1,940.78
Bonds of 1981
due to per 186 audit
1,014.56
Bonds of 1981
1980 Tax Inc. Debt Service
due to
35,000.00
Bonds of 1980
due to per 186 audit
542.75
Bonds of 1980
Bonds of 1981
due to per'86 audit
867.42
Bonds of 1979
due to per '86 audit
1,239.45
Bonds of 1978
1980 Tax Inc. Debt Service
due to
40,000.00
Bonds of 1977
Bonds of 1986
due to
53,000.00
Bonds of 1976
Bonds of 1986
due to
16,000.00
•
Improv. Bond Fund (bds 1976)
Bonds of 1987 Debt Service
assessment payments
21,074.52
-6 -
Bonds of 1987
. Bonds of 1987 Debt Service
1980 Tax INc. Debt Service
Improv. Bond Fund(Bds of 1976)
assessment payments 3,215.56
due to 280,142.42
reimbursement for advancement 5,209.99
Rec. $ Pool Debt Service
Rec. $ Pool Construction Fund due to per 186 audit 4,845.01
Fire Hall Debt Service due to per 186 audit 14,507.31
1980 Tax Inc. Debt Service
General Fund due to per 186 audit 10,847.12
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE FUND
Johnson Brothers Wholesale
Quality Wine & Spirits
Griggs Cooper $ Co.
ED Phillips & Sons
Quality Wine 4 Spirits
Johnson Brothers Wholesale
Ed Phillips $ Sons
Griggs Cooper $ Co.
PERA
Henrys Candy Co.
Coast to Coast
CIty of Hutchinson
Withhold Tax Acct.
City of Hutchinson
Northland Beverage
Hutchinson Telephone
Hutchinson Utilities
American Linen Supply Co.
Electro Watchman Inc.
Junker Sanitation
KDUZ
Hutchinson Leader
Commissioner of Revenue
Quality Wine $ Spirits
Ed Phillips 6 Sons
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Johnson Brothers Wholesale
wine
$ liquor
1105.62
wine
$ liquor
1606.61
wine
F, liquor
2880.95
wine
$ liquor
2658.67
wine
$ liquor
2806.59
wine
$ liquor
1502.87
wine
$ liquor
4021.20
wine
$ liquor
1881.72
employer contribution
179.28
nov.
invoices
993.24
calculator $ shop vac
79.87
dec.
ins. $ cigarette license
1045.68
employer contribution
308.03
payroll
4661.12
nov,
invoices
363.00
nov.
telephone
96.85
nov.
elec $ gas
563.98
nov.
invoices
16.96
quarterly alarm charge
102.00
nov,
service
102.60
nov.
advertising
312.00
Nov.
advertising
202.00
Nov.
sales tax
8063.18
wine
$ liquor
2805.91
wine
$ liquor
2587.94
wine
$ liquor
4131.96
wine
$ liquor
5487.42
$ 50,557.25
DsvIO B. ARNOLD
�
HARLES H. CARMICHAEL
LCHAEL H. L.BARON
DART D. M-DOWELL
PATE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOOE
CHARLES L.NAIL,JR.
DANIEL J. HERENS
LURA E. PRETEND
DAVID A. BHUEOOENANN
JOSEPH Y. PAIEMENT
November 23, 1987
ARNain & McDowEis.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
awl CEDAR LAKE ROAD
101 PARK PLACE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554le
15181 baa -8000
HuTcHmsox. MINNESOTA 55350
'1
Yx To" PREF 600-0M10-aa4b
(812) 587.7575
•\R_71/1�,
TELECOPIER 1)181 546.1790
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
501 SODTR ?09273711 5r3ISET
O. HARRY ANDERSON
nI
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55571
481810)9-8816
11
J1
734 TENTH STREET LST
OLENCOE, YINNESO'[A 655'fe
15181 844.819
Ms. Barb Haugen
Center Coordinator
900 Harrington Street
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Emma Lake Estate
Our File No. 3188-87-0025
Dear Barb:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
It is my understanding that as a result of our meeting this past week,
• you or the Board will be setting up a conference with the Board,
Gopher Campfire, myself and Attorney McGraw all in attendance to
discuss the question of the proper interpretation of the Lake Will.
It is also my understanding that this conference is likely to take
place in early December. Please advise as soon as a date has been
arranged'so that arrangements for attendance can be made. I would
prefer not to meet Wednesday nights if at all possible.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
CC Gary Plotz
Gary: Please include this correspondence for the Council's review
as a "for your information" item.
DAVID a. ARNOLD
•CHARLES
R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL E. LBARON
GARY D. MCDOWELL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. HARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOOE
CHARLES L NAIL. JR.
LURA E. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGOEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
December 20, 1987
AHNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55050
(612) 587-7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: North American Cable Systems
Dear Mr. Plotz:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
8881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 58418
(812)845-2000
MN TOLL FREE 800.343.4545
SOI SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(812) 389-2214
$ " 4 --?
')FC 1987
ftCFJVRD
This letter is solely for the purpose of bringing the Council
and your office up to date on the cable television franchise
• here in Hutchinson. As you know, the City Council approved the
transfer of the franchise as a result of the merger of North
American with the Wisconsin Cable Teleivison Corporation at its
last meeting.
On a totally unrelated note, the local public access channel and
the Vocational School have been engaged in negotiations with
North American to expand programming opportunities on the local
public access channel and in particular, to give the Vocational
School "live" access to the cable television system in
Hutchinson. I am pleased to report that North American has been
very cooperative and helpful in this matter with the result as
outlined in a letter from North American dated December 9, 1987
outlining the terms and conditions of constructing the addi-
tional "head end."
The school board has not yet acted but this appears to be a very
attractive arrangement and I would assume no objections would be
forthcoming.
I should mention that North American has been very cooperative
and helpful, not only with the Board of Directors of the
Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. (HCVN-Channel 10), but
also with this office in connection with the merger and other
issues. As far as I am concerned, North American's continued
presence following the merger (as part of the management team of
the reformed company) is a significant, positive feature of the merger.
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
December 20, 1987
Page #2
If you have any questions in connection with any of the
foregoing, please contact me.
Thank you.
Very rvM,
y yo rs,
ARNOkCD WELL
l�i�
G. Bar tldersop
GBA:lm
9
•
0
DAVID H. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL R. "DAMON
DART D. WDONE"
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. HARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOOF
CRARLES L NAIL, in.
LURA E. FRETLAND
DAVID A. HRUEOOEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
December 20, 1987
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARR PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
United States Fidelity
& Guaranty Company
800 Marquette Avenue
Claims Office
Minneapolis, Mn. 55402
(612) 567-7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. HARRY ANDERSON
Re: Bid Bond issued by USF & G
Gopher State Contractors, Inc.
• Rice, Minnesota
Our File No. 3188-87-0029
Gentlemen:
0
Seel CEDAR LEE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55 le
(el2)645-1000
MM TOLL PREF 900-340-4546
301 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 654171
(e12) 41HR-1214
DEC1981
E
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
I am enclosing herewith a copy of our correspondence to Gopher
State Contractors dated September 15, 1987 which outlines the
basis of a claim of the City of Hutchinson against Gopher State
Contractors, Inc. and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company.
To aid you in your effort in locating the appropriate file, I am
enclosing herewith a copy of the bond dated March 11, 1987.
Please contact me with regard to payment of the bid bond amount
at your earliest possible convenience. Thank you.
Ver 1 yours,
AR McDOWELL
/ j,A
Ci• B y Ander on
GBA: m�
CC , .Gary D. Plotz
DAVID A. ANN*LD
CHARLES R.CARMCSAEL
SICRAEL S. L.RLRWI
OAST D. Y.DOMELL
RATE EDOMLES
RTEVEM A.AMDERSOR
O. ALEFT AMDRRS®7
STEVEN S. SOOE
CHARLES L.NAIL.JR.
DANIEL J. SEREMS
LAURA E. DBETLAND
DAVID A. AECEOOENANN
JG6EFS S. FAIE IE
September 15, 1987
AnNoI.n & MCDowELL
AxxonNaYs AT LAw
101 PARS PLACE
HUTcmxsON, MINNESO?i 55350
(818) 587.7575
RESIDENT ATIORNIM
O. RARRr ANDERSON
Gopher State Contractors, Inc.
P.O. Box 7
Rice, Minnesota 56367
5051 CEDAR LARS ROAD
WINNSAVOL15. WIMMS01A ewe
am 5+5.0555
7O7 TOLL "ER 600.040-4e45
TELECOFIEE "M 545-1700
5o1 SOOTS FoSRrE erssar
FRINCETUR, SINNRSOTA 55071
aw Oee-Rm4
714 TERTS STREET EAST
OLENCOE, W10"" EGTA 55000
as 804 -Out
Re: City of Hutchinson vs. Gopher State Contractors, Inc.
and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company
Our File No. 3188-87-0029
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that this office represents the City of Hutchinson •
in connection with a claim against Gopher State Contractors, Inc.
and its bid bond issued by United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company.
In our opinion, and in the opinion of Construction Analysis and
Management Incorporated (CAM), Gopher State's withdrawal of May 29,
1987 was wrongful and left the City without appropriate coverage for
the labor contract involved in this bid. As you know, Gopher State's
bid was for carpentry installation identified as Bid Package #10 in
the amount of $24,015.00.. As a result of the failure of Gopher State
to carry out its original commitment, it has been necessary for the
City of Hutchinson to secure substitute performance which will now
cost the City the sum of $41,247.00.
In our opinion, Gopher State's failure to perform will make Gopher
State or its bid bond carrier responsible to the City for damages.
The City's damages, at this juncture, appear to be the difference
between the amount for which the work was suppose to be performed
subtracted from the amount the City has now been required to expend
to complete the work.
Please notify your bid bond carrier of this claim and have them get
in touch with me at their earliest convenience. Thank you.
Very 'truly yours,
ARNOLD a MCDOWELL •
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
CC Vergil Florhaug - Construction Analysis
Gary Plotz for distribution to City Council
DAVID H. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL B. L.BARON
GARY D. MCDONELL
FAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. BOOK
CHARLES L. NAIL, JR.
LURA E. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOORMARN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
December 20, 1987
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587-7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. HARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: State of Minnesota (City of Hutchinson)
vs. Melvin Rlockmann
Our File No. 3188-87-0020
Dear Gary:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410
(812)545.9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(512)389.2214
DFC 1981
RECEIVED
sv._._---.—
is
This letter will serve as a summary and an update on the above
referenced file. A Pre Trial Conference was set before the
Honorable L.W. Yost on the two pending criminal charges against
Mr. Rlockmann specifically, maintaining a public nuisance in
violation of Hutchinson City Ordinance No. 1025 and failure to
remove junked motor vehicles.
Mr. Rlockmann sometime ago removed the motor vehicles in
question and the charge relating to the motor vehicles was
dismissed. Rlockmann entered a plea of guilty to maintaining a
public nuisance and paid $40 in court costs. The court has not
sentenced Mr. Rlockmann on the violation with regard to a public
nuisance. Rather, the court has given Mr. Rlockmann thirty days
to finish cleaning the property and filling the hole in question
and to complete these tasks to the satisfaction of the City
Building Inspector in accordance with the Building Inspector's
letter of December 3, 1987 which outlines the deficiencies in
the property. Assuming Mr. Rlockmann completes his respon-
sibilities, the court will in all probability dismiss the
Petition and charge. If Mr. Rlockmann does not complete his
responsibilities within thirty days, upon notice by the City
Attorney, Mr. Rlockmann will be returned to the court for the
purpose of sentencing. The court specifically asked that the
sentencing issue be left open so that the court would have the
• option of imposing jail time if necessary.
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
December 20, 1987
Page A2
By carbon copy of this correspondence, I am notifying the
Building Inspector of the results of the Pre Trial Conference
and if it is not too inconvenient, perhaps he could notify me on
or about January 20, 1988 as to whether or not Mr. Klockmann has
corrected the deficiencies in the property noted in the letter
of December 3, 1987.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any,.
questions, as always, feel free to contact me.
Very tr 1 ours, 1 /\
ARNOL DOWELL 1
G.L)y Anderson
GBA:lm
CC James Marks
E
•
HUTCHINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
George Gordon, Chairmen
to Popp. Clerk
ra Green. Treasurer
December 9, 1987
DuWayne Peterson, Vice Crisman
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 423 Lucille Arlt, Director
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA SS350 Jerry Jones, Director
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
12/11/1987
Eugene Anderson FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Potential Street Across the Northerly Portion of the
West Elementary School Site
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Your letter of December 1, 1987, concerning the above topic,
was reviewed by the Hutchinson School Board on December 8, 1987.
Following school board review and discussion, it was determined
• that the potential street location would be very detrimental to
future planned usage of that area. The area of the potential
street is planned to be used for physical education fields and
playgrounds.
Therefore, it is requested that the street not be located
across school district property. However, if the district can
assist with a north/south street along the east side of district
property (formerly owned by Rickeman) we would be willing to
discuss that with you.
If you have questions concerning above, please contact me.
Since ly,
41
Glenn Matejka
Superintendent of Schools
100ISTRICT OFFICES AREA VOCATIONAL -TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
]a GIOO Sa NOM 200 C.,., Avow
/b6r 6612) 07-2M PbO 1612)507-36M
Rob U*"d 9110 2d A.. SeOlbrwr
Pbw,6121587.2251 Ph.. 16121567-4910
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
JUNIOR HIGHSCHOOL
ROb.0 Rad
ELMWNTARY SCHOOL
1011 GRO S0.1
Ph.. (61 Z) 587.1837
.l�N~ETa
sa �1nui,•.I,rli
u� E��rrtm�•ni ()l T-rE111spwtation
9 f
�y, f¢ sox les
•',1„ �_`� 2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
fo, TQPT'�N-LLMAR MINNESOTA 5620'
December lc, 1987
Eugene Anderson
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, W 55350
Dear At. Anderson:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
•
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
12/15/1987
Thank you for taking the time to write a letter expressing the City's concern
over the possible rescheduling of the construction on T.H. 7 from 1988 to 1990,
and for giving us some suggested detours.
In a follow up conversation, you made us aware that using T.H. 15 in downtown
Hutchinson during 1989 would interfere with construction Hutchinson has
planned for water main replacement. In the next couple of weeks, we will
follow up on your detour suggestions.
The future progress on T.H. 7 hinges on finding an acceptable detour and our
abilities to complete all the project development requirements. We will keep
you informed if there are any changes in the contract letting date for T.H. 7.
Agai thank you for your suggestions and expressing your concerns.
Sincerely,
Patrick C. Hughes
District Engineer
JWH: PCH: dk;,
C-: J. May
M. G. GieSeke
B. J. Sieck
J. w. Henslin
0
(612) 587-5151
JWHUTCHINSON,
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST FOR YOUR INFORMATION
MINN. 55350
December 10, 1987
Mr. Richard Goebel
Goebel Fixture Company
528 Dale Street
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Goebel:
Pursuant to your letter dated August 5, 1987, and at the direction of the City
Administrator, this department has investigated the inplace storm sewers on
Roberts Road and on Lake Street to determine if the pipes are obstructed,
thereby resulting in storm water back-up onto your property. No evidence of
collapsed pipes or obstructions was found.
We have since given the problem preliminary study to determine if and where
• capacity problems may exist in the City's storm sewer system. Our study is
not completed, but we have begun examining the feasibility of installing a new
storm sewer on Lake Street that would drain north to the river. The inplace
storm sewer on Lake Street presently drains south to Roberts Road, and then
west. By installing a pipe on Lake Street that drains north, we could increase
capacity and could replace deteriorated storm sewers on Osgood Avenue, Hayden
Avenue and Fischer Street. A potential problem with the design is the need for
obtaining right-of-way across private property for the pipe outfall into the
river. Alsop assessments would be levied to recover the cost of the project.
Our preliminary design is not complete, and due to the preliminary estimate of
cost of the aforedescribed project and to the schedule for public improvement
projects throughout the City, this project, regretfully, cannot be addressed in
1988. However, we will continue our study, as time permits, of the above
solution and other potential solutions.
If you have any questions in this regard, please call me at 587-5151, Extension
208.
Sincerely,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
�,
� �'VVQ•" �'
• Eugenie E
erson
Director of Engineerinq
v
cc: Mayor and City Council v
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
•
•
HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE December 15, 1987
f_OR YOUR INFORMATION
Gary Plotz
FROM Ron Kirchoff
SUBJECT The Resignation of Parking Enforcement Officer Peter Flucke
Enclosed you will find a copy of the resignation of Peter Flucke. This is
for your information and that of the Mayor and Council. It would be my recommenda-
tion to not fill this position until such time as Chief Steven Madson has a chance
to review the need and job description.-
I am certain we can effectively enforce the parking ordinance by utilizing
our Community Service Officer Roger Bakken during this interim period.
December 14, 1987
Chief Ron Kirchoff
Hutchinson Police Department
Hutchinson, MN
Dear Ron,
Effective January 4, 1988 please accept my resignation from the
position of Parking Enforcement Officer for the City of Hutchinson.
I am resigning because I will be moving to the City of Bloomington
in January.
Sinc rely,
oreter Flucke
PARKS • RECREATION • FORESTRY
900 Harrington Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(812). 587.2975
SENIOR CENTER CIVIC ARES
��•���A 587-8584 587-4279
To: Bruce Ericson
From: Tracy Flucke
Date: December 7, 1987
This is to°inform you that I have accepted a position with the Minnesota
Sports Federation located in Maple Grove Minnesota. I will be leaving my
current position as of Monday, January 4, 1988.
I have enjoyed working here for the past two years and gained much valuable
experience. Hopefully I will get an opportunity to work with you again
through some MSF endeavors.
Thanks again for allowing me to be a part of the Hutchinson Parks and •
Recreation Department, it has been fun.
40
MEMO
' DATE: Deowbor 3d, 1987 AEVIM) 12/09/1997
TO: Fhym and City Cantil FOR Y" DFUM TION
FRIM: Director of agtrmriig
BE: Fbasible 1988 Iuprmanmt Project Hepmt
Following is a synopsis of pojects p:cpoeed fm 1988 mmt=Um with eatimted costa, including 22 pesent for City e:pesa The projects are being proposed due to directim fWm
the Cantil, negssts fhn adjeemt affected popety cruse, for min to reasas, am/m WSW m engineering omside ativ
E 3rDv H) ES77MUED ESf1M TED 0E)FEFM WAM MID
IOUL C11Sr Crry 00541' h4S014HE ASSfSSMWIS SBM RM C1Tf FSA Omm
1. Bituminous arms (art and @rtter i place)
See cep Mddbit -A-
a.) Colorado St. ttm 8th Ave. N.W. to Nmth Tondos,
6th kn. N.W. ttm Srhml FMad to Colasdo. St., and
Colorado Circle from Colorado St. to cul-de-sac, as
requested in a letter fret Mr. Tyrone Mallard.
ar6divisim Age®ent (1986)
b.) Sdml Aged flm 7th Ave. N.N. to (alifania St. as
regaested in a letter hon M•. Tyree Hellard. A
portlm of the cwt is eligible for Mniaipal State
Aid Pins bemse of the street being rdder and ttd
in stnsbre than a local street. City Coat is FSA
eligible. Campbell®
o.) l lane fnaWvdmtely 300 feet north of
Hilltop Lana to Cmrwtimt Street in Claric's 2nd
Addition. Paving the east -wast patim of this street
say need to be delayed mtll utility installation is
ocopleted to the Mxbae propety myth of Cmpbell
na
laand rest of Correction; St., the mbdivldi g of
rMrh is perdirg, bdh ®
this will be studied in re
detail before a final recommdatim. anhdivision
Agreements for Cleric's aid Add. (1978) and QmVball
palm Add. (1987).
E 41,500.00 E
dor
0.00
$ 41,500.00
$ 0.00 E
0.00
E 0.00
E 0.00 E
0.00
76,900.00
33,700.00
43,200.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33,700.00
0.00
19,800.00
4,390.00
15,450.00
2,650.00
0.00
1,700.00
0.00
0.00
EMT4 in
F8 WT®
E3rD4A=
OFFEM
HATFA MID
lorAL OOST
C1T7 COST
Ate?
AS4 SSSS[ 44M3
355 RM
cm
!m
0190
d.)
Tyler St. and MZcnald Drive in Lafaa+ood Terrace
E 24,400.00
E 0.00
S 24,400.00
E 0.00
$ 0.00
E 0.00
E 0.00
S 0.00
Fauath AhHtim. 3bdivisim Agna®art for
McDonald's 2d Add. (1971).
e.)
Lakeview Lare 0m Sdnol Hoed to Roberta Asad.
14,900.00
0.00
14,900.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9uDdivisim Agremmt fbr itoDonald's 2d Add. (1971)
and McDonald's 3d Add. (1971) and itdaald's 7th
Add. (1983).
f.)
Liody lane, Hilltop Drive and Gene's Road in
36,600.00
1,950.00
34,650.00
0.00
0.00
1,950.00
0.00
0.00
Kimberly's Country Rkates. 9ilmvisim Agreaffid
(1983).
g.)
Snrwood St. fr Cmtvy Ave. to 135 Fbet Smth.
4.000.00
0.00
4,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Sibdivlsim Ageem t fbr Srtmldtharr's let Add.
(1980) and Sd�'e 2nd Add. (1981).
Sub -Total
E 218,100.00
E 40,000.00
E 178,100.00
2,65D.00
0.00
E 3.650.00
33 700.00
0.00
2. Qat A GAter A Bibzdmn &rfaairm
Sea
i@pMlibit eW
a.)
ilalant St. and Hillcrwt Road in lava's Eluff Additim.
20,500.00
0.00
20,500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
enhdlvlatan Ageement (1983).
b.)
Slady Rldge fund from T.H. 7 to H111top Lane. 819' of
89,000.00
34,701.00
54,300.00
0.00
0.00
34,70D.00
0.00
0.00
ftmtage is oomnreial, 610' is anti .,t . Rate to
equally allaate oat between assessable frontage and
moble frmtap is ".OD per fkont foot, in
rhirh came the City Cost wmid be $4,689.00. Rate is
338.Go per front foot fbr City Cost shorn.
a.)
Gn tm St. in StilUrg'a.Hoeft Add.
7,400.00
0.00
7,400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
d.)
Keith St. A &meet St. between South Grade Rd. and
58,600.00
0.00
58,600.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
(hump Ave., and 0rioap Ave. frmm Keith St. to
3mat St. in Mesa Helghta Add., as requested by
adJwmt popaty «anal. 39)divisim Avr t (1986)
hSMATED ESrII4M EMINTED OFFII4® WATER AND
TMAL 03sr my Wsf ACQ.CCAam ASSED4?11S 350 RAA) QTY ?m 0.7kn
e.)
Les Rada Parimay ftm line Lim 'hail to T.W. 7, $
45,600.00 E 25,000.00 5 20,600.OD 5 0.00 E 0.00 S 25,000.00 S 0.00 $ 0.00
iWAuffrg irbesection rmligmeht that would regldre
acquisition of' an easesvnt m the Ceno parcel. City
.
Cost shorn is bsoerne policy has been to assess only
the narrow ftmtage of benefitting parcels. Abutting
ftcvbage of the parcels for this project is the lag
aide, approximately 3901 m each side. The City Cost
Wald be abort $17,500.OD.
Grading and agueWte base constnrctim (m art and
4035 Y99,OB ap3,4ep.ep G.6C 049 G.W 6.96 0.09 9.09
ertter and bitnv&mm aaYacirg) m appoximtely
1500 That of Ica Raba P&4w in areas of unstable
soila in peparatim far bibmimn surfacing, in
aoomdwm with hgnt 24th. 1987, m'morludm,
Exhibit 'C1.
f.)
4th Ave. S.W. ftm Fain St. to Lym ped, Including
143,200.00 110,000.00 33,200.00 O.OD 11,270.00 98,800.00 0.00 0.00
4- tater main replaoelart ftm (kava St. to Lynn Road
Rats of asaessant is $49.00 fa• 5961 of assessable
ft'mtem, pan rater sevlce replaoa>eht.
g.)
Grave St. hm ad Asa. S.W. to 5th Ave. S.W..
72.000.00 3B,4m.00 33,600.00 0.00 0.00 38,400.00 0.00 0.00
2rd Ave. S.W. hen Ptaklin St. to lisle St. The Camty
457,500.00 325,000.00 132x500.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00 175,000.00 150,000.00
has Masted $150,000 as its stere of the pvjeat cost.
State Aid regulation r"*iim that far a calm
arterial, which is t}e present ftrMuc ial
nlassuicatim of ad Ave. S.W., with projected trafne
from S,ODD to 10,000 vehicles pa' day, the cut to ort
width be 48 feet with larking m both sales, ar 38 feet
with pwidtg m me aide only. Preset street width
vary fan 40 feet to 46 feet. Any street widening
Wald result in ranov=rg a nffier of boulevard trees.
Rate to egml y allocate ooat bet em assessable
ftmtage aid tmassessable fkmtage is $61.00 per
ftcvb Prot, in which case the Qty Cost Wald be
$91,000.00. Assammumt rate is $38.00 par ftmt fort
fm City Cent shoal. Qty Cmt 13 eligible far
KMW4al State Aid Rnds. The Oonty has budgeted
'150,000.OD, m its stere of the project cost, Ihtch
Will red= the City Cost to $175,000.00.
4^ lett main replacem,t m 2nd Ave. S.W. fmm
Ptwidin St. to Dale St. and m Grore St. ft® Zed
Ave. S.W. to 4th Ave. S.W. Ammed replacamnt of
Water main arcs appatae<aes to be City Cost; assess
service replacement.
In.) Frwiain St. from MmMzgtm Ave. to lst Ave. S.W.,
I nUding mater main replaomuht, etc sews
teplaommtt or eehabilitstim, and angle paridng in
the area of the Fblim Statim. Wstermin
replaemmt is aaurat to be City Q1st; service
replaomont to be assumed. Rete to a4ally allcmte
r o"W oost bemaai amweble nmtap and
nm4smaasle flmtae is $163.00 pa' ftmt foot, in
Which we City Cost fbr rwAW reoanWOtim wmw
be $86,200.00. Assssm nt rete is $38.00 per flint
That far City Cost stxm.
i.) Glen St. fn® koMrgtm Ave. to Zed Ave. S.W. ad
1st Ave. S.W. flm Fterelin St. to mm St.,
inclnditg later main replaommrt m Glen St. fb®
Wacdngtm Ave. to let Ave. S.W. Wates' main
replacement assmad to be (Sty Owt; service
replaomnt to be assayed. late to "Mlly allamte
voe&W cost Wbmml assessable frontage and
rm-aaseamble frmtW is $79.00 per tlmt foot, in
Which came City Cost ftr rca&W reomwtmatim wmld
be $105,600.00. Asmmm t t rate is $38.00 per fkcnt
fbot far City Cmt shwa, ehidh inolvlm w assesmeat
to the adnol district ftxrtW m the wast side of
(Han Street ba=ne that distance is the long dlageim
of the parcel. if the (much dnmms to asoma the
lag x3=1 ftmta®a les 150' abutting iastdrgtm
Avaan, and also, ad Avenn S.W., the City Cost veld
be 313193DO.009 aswWM an amessnaht tete of 338.OD
pa Print tbot.
i 152,000.00 $ 106,500.00 3 45,500.OD $ 0.00 $106,500.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00
123,800.00 113,600.OD 10,200.OD
0.00 14,50D.OD 99,100.00 0.00 0.00
J.) 3rd Ave. N.N. from Main St. to T.H. 7, rcaAay
reomaFnntlm. City Coat was determined ,sing an
assessment rete of $45.00 par hint Pact Crr 3,326
Peet of Aw taV. City Cast is eligible Por EfadnW
State Aid Wads.
Dakota Rdl lnterds to set a dining train on their
trade an tis north side of 3rd Av N.W. beb een
Main Street ad Glen Street. MW will likely be
re7mating angle Parking In the street. The
assessable hostage that was determined does not
inrolude any frontage of railroad rishtWfw.
Stator Sear to sates arms abutting 3rd Ave. N.W. and
WrthMVft m, Mnidn Is eligible fbr SU" Aid
Wading aid pom-Able MA/DDr Pladlrg UTWO a
oaaperetive agreneant. It is aeemal Etat 1%, vhidn
is $64,155.00, of the owt oar be ArKW by ESA and
EN/00f ooapeative agreement. Lwasment retae are
then estimated to be $0.033 Per s*u foot far trunk
atom �, and $0.164 Per spare foot for trunk and
lateal atom saer to achieve w City Cost. Sas
w000paylrg sap far apprmifmate assaameat areas.
It 13 rutamaVW that parcels abutting 3rd Av N.W.
were assessed $0.065 Per sqfoot fir a atom sear
Pr Jest In 1975. Otter propenes in the drainage area
were not reviasd fm pevios awa9eme ta. Mare
pmavtty are defaced assesma is m p wvels abutting
3rd Avenne N.W. from 1968 fog sanitary sewer and water
main that mould be activated.
ESM4AM R3rDv ID ESIWTD OEFEFJM WATFD AND
TOTAL (AST CITY oosr ASSEMN E AS5MOM SBM FLM cm ESA 09NN
$ 390,400.00 $ 240,730.00 f 149,670.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 f 0.00 $240,730.00 $ 0.00
427,700.00 $ 202,555.00 724,945.00 139,700.00 0.00 0.00 64,155.00 0.00
k.) Frontage Hoed South Side of T.H. 7 from Sdnol Riad i--iBf,9BB.BB f---NLr3k1p.BD f--a7,000.GD —m-0. � m-0. $.44r755.G0 j—g,OB
to app dmately 900 feet West of WWI goad,
re0o ahrrotim or the frontage rued, and providing a
mamtim to T.H. 7 about 900 feet West of Sdrool
Hoed as requested by -Mupw Amoria . Mt/DOT approval
est is attained for rombay amneotim to T.H. 7.
City Cost stoma is bawd an estimated assessable
troMaga as deter road from ptosed and passible
Mae platting, and an assessumt rate of
.�
M:rr1M im)
PrIlm'nd)
KirmnL
DIUMUUM
INIM AEU
,
•
TTA!. (1,m
_ MIT (1,1TI'a
-AIML11tR
!Vt , L4wm
"at AM
CM _
MN
(rIMIY
{
•
appemdoately $225.00 per hint root.
N*�Tbtai
$ 1.987.700.00
$ 1.196.785.00
$ 790,915.00
$130,700.00
$132,200.00
W 000.00
srg.W.00
$150,000.00
Total Parts 1 A 2
$ 2.205,800.00
$ 1,236.785.00
$ 969,015.00
$141,350.00
$132,200.00
1)299.650.00
$513,58%00
$150.000.00
3. SsniW7 Salary liter M dn, Stam &e k Qydirg and Amite am
Sae
Mop bhihit v,
a.)
ilesb,md Rand in 3Wet Nid®a Mditim, as reQmted
43,900.00
0.00
43,900.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
by the ftdivida'.
b.)
Carolina Ave. and Atdzaa St. in Holland's 8th Add.
79,300.00
0.00
79,300.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.)
Darnell Drive, Uretta Lane, MoDmold Drive, Parc
165,900.00
0.00
165,900.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
]bland Drive and !trey Thee Road in the 5th Mditfm
'
to lalealood Tertese, as regleated by the 91bdivide•.
d.)
Reith St. and Sliest St. Sufih or Chicago Ave. and
2229,40D.00
0.00
229,400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Clevela i Ave. e d Chsys se St. in Plain flaunts
Add., as requested by the Subdivider.
e.)
Toms Ave. fk® Calirania St. to the Mst Tamtne
50,000.00
0.00
50,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
of Tessa Ave. in Ttdn OWcs Addition, as requasW by
the SObdivida.
r.)
Colamdo St. hr= 7th ave. N.W. to 8th Ave. N.W. The
i-- 4&rIBG.6B
0------440
C=42rmm
9rbdLvidw has requested Etat the City delay oz-ftg
w
these ate to a flrbre year.
&ds Total
$ 568,500.00
$ 0.00
$ 568.500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
r
Total Parts 1, 2 A 3
$ 2,774.300.00
$ 1.236,785.00
$1,53!.515.00
$141,39D.00
132 200.00
$299,650.00
$513,585.00
$15D,000.00
!j
4. Mas ella,r.a
Sea Mp IDdsibit -E-
Ea.)
a.)
QediM stain seam and ante base on Hilltop
41,500.00
0.00
41,500.00
.0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Drive h® Mldnigm St. to Paul's Pond
0
r
ES "TM EnWT D ES MTED 9RFwED WATFD AND
lorAL oosr MY 03sr ASSEMM ASESSOM San RAD CLTY MR COIMDY
b.)
Water min loop an the 9MM aide of T.H. 7 from
4 67,199.96 4 39,459.80 : gr656.06 4 43999 4 33,%g 6 BA9 4 0.09 i 8.00
HLdfl n Ave. to Rtdi St., per 10 Year Dwrvjmaat
(Deleted, awmillg pmjeht will be dame in catb=etim with T.H.T rownstmetim, vMch is asmmad to a after 1988.)
Rugs, to povide far fire protection and mt r
service on the south aide of T.H. 7.
a.)
Sadtary saner and water min on L edtim Ione, as
58,600.00 0.00 58,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
regeated by an abutting pwerty aver. A paVehal
msoment is regdred. No Warred assessments will be
levied it a pavet al easana t oon be obtained to
allow a project route directly west to Owlitwr,la St.
Rate par That would be abort $46.00.
d.)
Sanitary sem and later min reomat, rUm m M31n
236,700.00 199,300.00 3(,400.00 0.00 199,300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
St. So. fmoa 4th Ave. S. to Oddand Ave. in
ovt}emtion with W/Wr T.H. 15 Project. Sanitary
saner Is detaloreted and in [need of rep]acommtl
water min stnuld 1e imwLsad in size fron 6s to 12s.
Assumed to assess only saucer and water sevioes and
aPPrtaancev.
e.)
Sanitary seas^ replacment or rehabilitation avail
70,000.00 70,000.00 0.00 0.00 70,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Reralles site, de to detain ted rlv baic sale
that las higi rates of infiltration. Lining the
aaaer pay be fmalme at an estimated host of 135,000.
f.)
Stora saner in the area of tale St. Iran the Crow
169 am 25,469.68 143,999.88 om 0A9 6.09 X409.98 BAB
River to Roberta Hud, per o=vspmiama f= Goebel
Fixture. An outfall easement is nee(kd. Estimated
mat lmhdes street paving ally as regitred to
testae roedrmr acv dUhrW by at" sass
omshvmtim. State Aid Ride mold be need to detlW
abort 1% of the oust, in which arse the avant
'.
rate would be 10.145 Iger sgave foot. Othawlse, the
rate would be 10.17 per sgere fmt and a typiml
asaasemmat world be 11,700.00 per residential lht.
g.)
Stam ewer and bitnmlme aafacing of the per{dng
i 20.000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 1 87,000.00 E 0.00 1 0.00
lot on the sant side of RsACUn Ave. Nwth of City
0
r
• FST MATED E ff"TED ESMATED OE nMW WAM AND
IMAL COST Cm C= ASSESSABLE ASSESSMS 55M E12D am MSN Omm
Hall, as requested in the aooaperpdng Petition.
Pal" lot assessment Statute 459 required a minima
Of 94 assaSMIDERnt. That statute was repealed in
1987 and to date no net tnfbrmtim has been Wcai ad.
W, Tbtal $ 426,800.00 $ 289.300.00 $ 137.500.00 $ 0.00 300.00 20 000.00 $ 0.00 0.00
MW TUrM $ 3.2111,100.00 $ 1,526,085.00 $1.675.015.00 $141,350.00 t 500.00 $319,650.00 $513,583.00 $150,ODD.00
The City Coat, enrludirg WA and Wahy Eliding is estimated to be $862,500.OD, and 8WIWdtng deferred assessnants is $721,150.00.
The City's current balance in the State Aid Fad is $496,98H,A0, and or anticipated 1988 allotaam is $1992667.00, for a total 1988 CaaUrntim Rrd Eklawa of $696,655.00. Tte
estimated NSA mWditue is $513,585.00.
Sldaallo in the City have been inspected, bat results have not been tabulated for a determination of replao®ant oust. I4attua , W/Wr miry be mmatrwting TIL 7 fuse the
railroad aomirg by lloddte Silo to the east mmporate limits AlUnuer a oust estimate and estimated City partiaipatim have not been dete=LrMp the Citys oost is thaot to be
mENmal, ad could be Raided by assessna is or NSA.
Direction from the Council is requested as to tidrh projects should be pread.
MVw
attachments
ada,o"Ilptl'
Director of Mvhwring
fOR YOUR INFORMATION
PION39UA D LIBRART STSTiM iU&CUrIVB CCMMITTSB MWING
November 9, 1987
•
Present: Steve Boehlks, Montevideo
Representing:
Chippewa County
Lilah Buhr, Stewart
"
McLeod County
Curtis Johnson, Appleton
•
Appleton
Gladys Nelson, Ortonvills
•
Ortonville
Linda Ulrich, Renville
"
Renville
Carol Conradi, Willmar
•
Willmar
Burton Sundberg, Director
Natty Matson, Associate Director
David Lauritsen, Chippewa Couaty Librarian
Absents Howard Turck, Litchfield*
Representing:
Meeker County
Jeanette Buchanan, Willmbre
^
Willmar
*Excused absence
Chairman Boehlke called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. Buhr/Nelson moved to approve
the minutes for the October 12 meeting. Carried. Johnaon/Ulrich moved approval of the
treasurer's report for October. Carried. Mr. Sundberg gave a detailed update of the
1987 budget. Ninety per cent of the funds have been spent through November 1987.
Director's report:
1. Statistics for October showed a decrease in circulation compared to October, 1986.
2. Clippings were passed around.
Six of the Carnegie libraries in PLS'will be receiving free VCRs from the Carnegie
oundation.
4. PLS staff members who attended the retreat at Green Lake Bible Camp October 22 and
23 commented favorably on the program and the opportunity to meet each other informally.
Nelson/Jobnson moved payment of the bills. Carried.
The first meeting of the committee to plan the integration of Renville, Lac Qui Paris,
and Teller Medicine counties into Pionserland in 1990 as required by the equal access
law was held October 27 at the Chippewa County Library in Montevideo. Meeting with
Jan ?eye-Stukas of the LDS office were Ulrich, Jacobson, and Boehlke from the PLS board;
the director and the associate director; Lauritsen, Chippewa County librarian; and Nelson,
Madison librarian. The discussion included the history of county support for public
Libraries in Minnesota, library service in the three counties involved in the integration,
financial aspects, the changes necessary in the Pioneerland agreement, and the types of
library services to be offered in the new counties. The minutes of the meeting and a
fact sheet for each county will be sent to the boards of commissioners of the three
counties asking to meet with them at their convenience. Nelson/Buhr moved to approve
the minutes as the plan of action. Carried.
Communications:
1. LDS has sent grant checks of $279000 and $44,880.
2. Big Stone County has approved payment of $21,937 for 1988 ($152 under request).
3. Letters have been sent to the governing boards regarding the expiration of terms
4 o 14 board members.
The Personnel Committee will meet December 14 at 7 p.m. to review the "stepR" of PLS
staff members in the salary Rchadule for the 1988 budfat.
Other business
1. Bora Fricke who has been the librarian at Spicer for 25 years is retiring at the
end of December. The PLS board is sending her a letter of thanks for her services.
2. The finance committee will meet at 7130 p.m. on December 14.
3. The executive committee will meet at 6 p.m. on December 14.
The meeting was adjourned at 9 p.m.
Idlah Buhr
Secretary
I
•
November 1987
Balance
Receipts:
Basic State/Federal Aid
Big Stone County
*Chippewa County
Kandiyohi County
McLeod County
Meeker County
Swift County
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
Treasurer's Report Curtis Johnson, Treasurer
BUDGET INCOME BUDGET INCOME
MTD YTD BUDGET
$174,565.70 $ 70,273.99
44,880.00
217,321.00
21,937.00
73,845.00
98,168.00
62,994.25
62,227.00
34,560.00
205,000.00
21,937.00
*73,845.00
98,168.00
62,995.00
62,227.00
34,560.00
Appleton
9,305.00
9,305.00
Benson
18,609.00
18,609.00
Glencoe
23,044.00
23,044.00
Graceville
3,568.00
3,568.00
Hutchinson
50,314.00
50,314.00
Kerkhoven
3,988.00
3,988.00
Litchfield
9,534.75
38,139.00
38,139.00
Ortonville
11,773.00
11,773.00
Willmar
80,320.00
80,320.00
Bird Island
6,659.00
6,659.00
*Dawson
9,227.00
* 9,227.00
Hector
6,077.00
6,077.00
*Madison
10,736.00
*10,736.00
• Renville
7,246.00
7,246.00
Cash Receipts
3,941.15
38,910.90
48,000.00
Gifts
3,175.80
2,000.00
Interest
769.17
5,788.41
8,000.00
Reimbursements (local gov't)
*Chippewa County
32,028.00
*32,028.00
*Dawson
5,472.00
* 5,472.00
*Madison
3,500.00
* 3,500.00
Benson (materials only)
1,681.16
1,681.16
Chippewa Co. (materials
only)
5,000.00
5,000.00
Other Reimbursements
666.45
6,263.31
5,401.00
Other
Total Receipts
59,791.52
951,876.83
948,819.16
Other funds
Glencoe Fund
3,742.00
KCWL
1,.7 8 6. 0 0
TOTAL RECEIPTS & BALANCE:
$234,357.22
$1,022,150.82
$954,347.16
i
Page 1 (OVER)
:ovembez 1987 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM TREASURER'S REPORT (Continued)
-RPENDITURESt
NTL YTD >< OF ERP CU%A
•CCT GROve..•
.00
_Ui
.404 ,
.00_
crSONAL SFKVICLS
064v--8
_
WS D0.00
TERMIt.AL MAINTENANCE
000 272.50
SALACIES ANJ AAYFi
S1.0PI.e2
5569V89.90_
80.934
-ili)0�.00
8.400.00
TV. -bT--is-�ie•�
GROUP*.. • • •
�6S•3419
17.900.00
MLALTN 1KSghA14Ct Ug�U0 15LE
445.14
2.461.11
77.652
3.20U.JO
P0000T 14$UkAI.Ce
4 912:.51
53.565.06
95.654
56.77.00
0
-"- �-�.3
- - CLTCK3u ...
A
4
_
960 •6-18.8
.00%
09794.30
:ATtRLALs
.UO
634.40
35.52%
19 7 PAN&O
WKS - ApULT
29896.62
57.478.30
100.29%
•.7.333._00___
8 K- h L K N
305.48 '
14.743.35
92.15%
169000.00
Gi%LPAL PEFERENCE
•00
7.217.89
120.30%
69J00.00
PER 1001CALS
166.38
20946d.93
97.474
219000.00
_
- PAMPHLETS
.JO
155.0
1.4 t
300.00
SeIFT CGU.4TY MATERIALS
•00
405.26
.006
.00
PENSO.Y LIOPARY MATEKIALS
236.11 __
_ 19.66-.79
87.254
-- -1.681.16
-
GNTaPEKA COU�iTY la Ti�"!gTT-c�TICS
1.
•0 •
. .
$9000.00-
FW L 1bMM FILMS
.00
2.600.00
66.674
39V00.30
VIDiD DISCS C TAPcS
30.00
3.339.34
69.S7%
4.600.00_
--AU-1lu i71SL5 -%nD IRKS
.90
120655.
X00000
SLICES AND FILP STRAPS
284.15-
[92.55
117.02%
250.00
MKROF'7AM1
.00
154.50
154.904
100.00
ACCT GROUP... 2964707 1129000.36 95.39% 1179414.16
A•ALOGING
rLLL AND -UVhtK .UV 6.79V.17 '97.9i4 10•YVV.B
COM VCNL*R CHARGES 4.013.06 20.111.79 168.47% 10.671.00
ACCT GROUP... 49.313.06 29.081.98 101.434 28.67 "
OPERATION AwD MAINTENANCE
INS W ANCE
639.35 12.701.33 ".b8% 1590
368.60 904.04 60.271 195
_ •W •VV .VV. 1.YVV.VV
ACCT CROUP... 11007.95 13.605.37 66.371 209500.00
'.4MMUalICLTION
46.44
952.48
-
'TEL iP N7NE--AN7 c i. b
•b • .4
064v--8
_
WS D0.00
TERMIt.AL MAINTENANCE
000 272.50
19.46%
19400.00
POSTAGE AND SNIPPING
730.65 7.396.30
94.95%
8.400.00
- -AECT
GROUP*.. • • •
.4 %
17.900.00
s W 1PME NT
VAINTcNE%CE A+40 CONTRACTS 1.413.54 16.138.34 134.494 129004.00
ACCT GROW... 19547.64 189908.57 128.63% -_ _ 14.700.00
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND ECJIPMENT
46.44
952.48
95.25%
1.000.00
SUPPLIES AND PRINTING
1.179.82
16964B•94
$3.24%
209000.00
--
IIhDPIOTI OVAL 4140 Pk36P*MAl,vG
165.31
920.04
16 4.0 %
500.00
M1LEAbE AND MEE71.44S - STAFF
19601.60
49578.30
83.24%
59500.00
041LEAZE A14D MEEll%GS - TRuSTELS
275.94
29609.19
81.54%
3.20J.00
PROF. NkM.uEwSmliS I71US14 S1
184.00
517.00
234.004
250.00
AJS ANO LcG^L NG% CES
53.44
454.US
50".502
90.00
AUDiTiKG
.00
19403.00
116.679
1920G.00
-• --
`-3D*JR• E' Pll.a --
c . OU
i9472.00
L. i-
.0
CONTIt131N6 EOJCATID.%
25.3.05
19224.39
612.20%
20C.00
ACCT GLnU°... 49.#92.1,0
419154.49
96.30%
429643.00
-
GLENE W FaId40S• 19b3
.00
•00
.00%
39742.30
KCML
.UO
634.40
35.52%
19 7 PAN&O
VAG. TOTAL....
719122.47
8589916.07 90.004
ENDING CASH BALANCE $163.234.75 $163,234.75
Page 2
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, December 7, 1987
The meeting was called to order at 7:45 p.m. The minutes of the previous
meetings were read and approved.
There will be a Christmas party the evening of December 18, 1987. Mike Schmidt
will provide meat with lunch fund money; bring some "munchies". The childrens
Christmas party will be on December 20, 1987 starting at 2:00 p.m. There will
be a magician and Santa Claus. The captains will be putting on the event. A
reminder to keep the annual banquet in mind for dates and places to go. There
was some discussion about the annual meeting and steak fry to be held the first
Monday in January. A motion was made and seconded to hold the meeting and steak
fry at the V.F.W. Motion passed.
We will stuff envelopes for the dance at the 12-14 drill.
John Reynolds reported that the Safety Councils meeting was on fire
extinguishers. George Field reported that we should be watching for salesmen
selling heat and smoke detectors.
The map for the new rural numbering system is being drawn. It will then be
sent out for quotes.
The bid opening for the refurbishment of 1237 will be December 30, 1987 at 5:00
p.m., if the project is okayed by city council.
The following bills and runs were allowed paid from their proper account:
GENERAL ACCOUNT RURAL ACCOUNT
Bruce Precht
CITY
6.00
Randy Redman
9.50
Hager Jewelry
4.80
City of Hutchinson
1,890.00
Bill Arndt
288.50
Mike Schmidt
23.00
U.S. Postmaster
22.00
Don's Foods
57.74
Carr Flowers
12.50
Plowman's
413.60
Uniforms Unlimited
413.20
Total
2,393.84
Total
4 . 0
74-T.70-
Commun. Auditors
Commun. Auditors
48.00
25.97
CITY ACCOUNT
Electro Watchman
132.00
L&P Supply
21.05
Hutch Fire & Safety
122.72
L&P Supply
3.00
Hager Jewelry
6.15
Coast -To -Coast
2.69
Mid -Central
38.98
Coast -To -Coast
1.58
Mid -Central
2.50
Rutz Plb&Htg
22.00
American LaFrance
18.31
Snyder Drug
18.56
Johnson Radio Comm.
Quade Electric
92.50
32.40
Commun. Auditors
Commun. Auditors
48.00
25.97
Interstate Diesel
1,067.66'
Brinkman Studio
8.15
Jim Popp
30.00
Seagrave
18.10
Willmar Tech Inst.
800.00
Coast -to -Coast
8.69
Hutch Medical Ctr
270.00
Hager Jewelry
2.74
Commun. Auditor
48.88
Total
2,842.63
MINUTES-HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPT.
12/7/87
�Tj
11/1
11/1
Boelter
Pachan
11/14
11/14
Radunz
Mutual Aid/Brownton
11/2
Juul Construction
11/16
Busch
11/2
Drill/Meeting
11/16
Drill
11/3
Stueber
11/18
Schwab
11/5
Zavoral
11/20
Goebels
11/6
State Theatre
11/24
Brock
11/6
Buonocore
11/27
Valley Vista
11/9
Drill
11/28
Mutual Aid/Lester Prairie
11/14
Dostal
11/30
Vo -Tech
A motion was made and seconded for the secretary and treasurers salary be paid.
A copy of the treasurer's report for the September 26, 1987 Open House was
handed out and discussed, noting a profit from concessions of $206.,88, total
program cost $1,479.79, and a net department cost of $1,272.91.
A letter was read from Dave Larson thanking us for our help at the football
games, and check was enclosed for $262.50. This money will be used to sponsor
our next years fifth and sixth grade football team.
A letter was read from Rudy Perpich regarding the clean up of Minnesota for
"Celebration Minnesota 1990
Dale McLain thanked us for bringing a fire truck to the Santa Claus parade last
Saturday.
Jamie Emans and Scott Powell were reviewed and voted on after their probationary
year. Both were voted on to the regular department.
The annual election of officers was held. The results are as follows:
Chief:
Butch
Henke
First Asst. Chief:
Brad
Emans
Second Asst. Chief:
Randy
Redman
City Captain:
Craig
Almquist
Ladder Captain:
Dave
Franzen
Rural Captain:
Jim Brodd
Rescue Captain:
John
Reynolds
City Lieutenant:
Jim Popp
Ladder Lieutenant:
Gary
Forcier
Rural Lieutenant:
Tom Pessek
Rescue Lieutenant:
Jeff
Dobratz
Secretary:
Jamie
Emans
Treasurer:
Gary
Henke
After the election was completed, a motion was made and seconded to destroy the
ballots. Motion passed.
0
r
•
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPT.
12/7/87
The following people are nominated for Relief Association positions:
President:
Vice President
Director:
Steve Schramm
Jim Brodd
George Field
Dave Franzen is in the hospital. Butch will be sending flowers.
1233 will go in for service on December 17 or 18, 1987.
The Firefighter 2 program will begin January 19, 1987.
Dick Popp noted that there will be a "Train the Trainer" program at the Hutch
Vo -Tech January 16 and 17, 1988.
Another CIM (First Responder) course will begin in January. Please sign up.
Keep in mind what we should do in the event of an ice break through rescue.
Remember to take the boat and also not to go onto the ice unless instructed to
do so.
Dave Franzen received a bill for pool use for diving class. It will be sent to
Central Minnesota Divers.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:18 p.m.
Sincerely,
Jeff Dobratz
Secretary
a Published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, December 1st, and on Tuesday,
December 8th, 1987.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 87-38
PUBLICATION NO. 3761
TO WHOM 'IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 5.00 P.M. on the 11th
day of December, 1987, to consider the making of an improvement on Freemont
Avenue by the construction of Water Main and Appurtenances, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be
assessed for such improvement is the benefited property. The estimated cost
of such improvement is $2,000.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with
reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting.
0
City Clerk
Dated: November 25, 1987
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND TRIS REARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
i1
U
(612) 587-5151
lTY OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
;HINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: December 3rd, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Freemont Avenue Water Main Improvements
The improvement hearing for the proposed fire hydrant installation at the
east end of Freemont Avenue is scheduled for December 11th, 1987, at 5:00
P.M. A Resolution Ordering Improvement is attached for the council's
consideration following the hearing.
If the project is ordered, this department will obtain a quotation from a
contractor or contractors, with the intent of installing the hydrant this
year, thereby providing for needed fire protection. Restoration cannot be
completed until the spring of 1988, so we may not want to assess the cost
until after that time.
Respectfully submitted,
I
4L,ugennderson
Director of Engineering
EA/pv
attachment
LJ
0
9MINT MEG COKIMMS) CS
People 6Vith Experience TVho Care
OFFICE. TWELVE CAKS CENTER SUITE 1009 P.O. EOX 129 WAYZATA• MINNESOTA 55391 (612) 473.47E:_
• November 30, 1987
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson.
37 Washington Avenue West NN
Hutchinson, MN 5'5350
Dear"Mr. Plotz:
As you are aware,. the Greencastle condominium project in Hutchinson was
originally built -and owned by Retirement Living Communities, Inc. As
of November 1, 1987, eleven units have been sold and thereby owned
individually by the families/individuals purchasing these condominium
units. The remaining unsold units were _still._owned -by
'RLC.
This is to advise the City that -effective November 13, 1987, ownership
of the remaining unsold units was deeded to the First National Bank
of Minneapolis and, therefore, at this time all'of the property is
owned either by the individual owners or the First Bank Minneapolis.
9have received a notice on the hearing at City Hall on December 11,
87 and have forwarded a copy of this notice on to the Bank." We
presume this is with respect to the installation of a fire hydrant on
Freemont Avenue. . .
Until further notice, all correspondence, official notices, etc.
regarding the Greencastle project should be forwarded to the following:
1. Mr. Daniel T. Blomquist
Assistant Vice President, First Bank Minneapolis
Real Estate
Special Loans Division
First Bank Place
Minneapolis, MN 55480
Phone: 612/343-1966"
2. Elizabeth Brusehaver
Manager
Greencastle Condominium Association
250 Freemont
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Phone: 612/587-4040
3. The individual owners•of Greencastle units (a detailed list
of these names is available through Liz Brusehaver, Manager,
if you do nct have the current information).
Mr. Gary Plotz
November 30, 1987
Page Two
If the notice of the present hearing is applicable to the new fire
hydrant installation, I would assume that Mr. Ken Borne, owner of
the Village Apartments on Freemont, is also being notified as an
adjoining property owner (limited partner representative of Lots
9 and 10, Block. -2j Cedar Acres).
If you need any additional information, please advise.
Sincerely,
A 0 r
Newell P. Weed, Jr.
President
NPW:jt
cc: Daniel Blomquist .
Elizabeth Brusehaver
A
40
40
f
I
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT NO. 87-38
Resolution No. 8669
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 24th day of
November, 1987, fixed a date for a council hearing on the improvement of
Freemont Avenue by the construction of Water Main and Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon
on the 11th day of December, 1987, at which all persons desiring to be heard
were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 24th day of November, 1987.
2. Eugene Anderson is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
• Adopted by the Council this 11th day of December, 1987.
City Administrator
E
Mayor