cp05-23-1989 cHUTCHINSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK. OF
May 21 (TO May 27 �
i983
WEDNESDAY
-24-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Hall
4:30 P.M. - Board of Review
for Assessments
at City Hall
5:00 P.M. - Tree Board Meet
at Library Conf
ence Room
SUNDAY
-21-
THURSDAY
-25-
Noon - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns Manor
MONDAY
-22-
Noon - Safety Council Meeting
at Fire Station
U
VACATION:
FRIDAY
-26-
JO RUNKE - May 22 -26
HAZEL SITZ - May 22 -26
04
�4
�l
TUE AY
-2 -
2:00 P.M. - Open Bids at City
Hall for Transit
Bus
4:30 P.M. - City Council Inter-
views with Architee
tural Firms Re.
Remodeling/Replace-
ment of City Hall
7:30 P.M. - City Council Meet
at City Hall
SATURDAY
-27-
AOBKDe
RBGULAR KBBTIIG - HDTCHIISOX GITY COUICIL
TUESDAY, NAY 23, 1989
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.K.
2. Invocation - Rev. Lavern Johnson, Bethlehem United Xethodist Church
3. Consideration of Xinutes - Regular Xeeting of Nay 9, 1989; Bid Openings
o any , 1989 and Nay 15, 1989
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - April 1989
2. HRA Board Ninutes of April 18, 1989
3. Airport Commission Kinutes of Kay i, 1989
4. Planning Commission Ninutes of April 18, 1989
5. Hospital Board Xinutes of April 18, 1989
(b) Renewal of Set -Up License for Little Crow Bowling Lanes
(c) Reduced Refuse Rate for Senior Citizen
Action - Notion to order report and minutes filed, issue license
and approve reduced rate
5. Public Rearing - 8_00 P.X.
(a) Letting Yo. 3, Project No. 89 -03 (Downtown Sprinkling System)
Action - Notion to close hearing - Notion to reject - Notion to approve
and order preparation of plans and specifications - Notion to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 9008
(b) Assessment Roll No. 250 - Letting No. 2, Project Bo. 89 -02
Action - Notion to close hearing - Notion to reject - Notion to approve
and adopt Assessment Roll Ho. 250 and award contract - Notion to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9006 8 9007
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
i(a) Status Report On Hutchinson Hotel Project
Action -
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - HAY 23, 1989 0
(b) Consideration of Request for Hutchinson Lions Club to Operate Portable
Food Wagon In West River Park During Water Carnival Weekend
Acton - Notion to reject - Notion to approve request
7. Resolutions And Ordinances
(a) Resolution Ho. 9002 - Resolution for Purchase
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Request To Operate Food Concession In Library Square
During Summer Months (DEFERRED MAY 9, 1989)
Action - Motion to reject - Notion to approve and enter into agreement
(b) Consideration of Public Parking Lot for North Main Street Under The
Developnent District Program/Tax Increment Finance Plan of 1980
(DEFERRED APRIL 25, 1989)
Action - 0
(c) Consideration of Sewer And/Or Water Hook -Up Fee Policy
Action -
(d) Report By Consultant Engineer On South Grade Road Sidewalk
Action -
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Notion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Proposed Street Light Projects In 1989
Action - Notion to reject - Motion to approve and refer to Utilities
(c) Consideration of Payment Adjustnemnt To Henards for Construction of
Airport Hangar
Action - Notion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution 9009 0
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 23, 1989
(d) Consideration of Rejecting Bids for Letting No. 4, Projects No. 89 -05,
89 -08, 89 -07 & 89 -12
Action - Notion to reject bids - Notion to approve - Notion to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 9005
(e) Consideration of Authorization for Temporary Bridge Construction
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve
(f) Consideration of Accepting Parkland Donation of Lot 10 In Block 21,
South Half In Townsite of Hutchinson
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve and accept donation
(g) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to Move Garage To 533 Huron
Requested By Wilma Ross with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Notion to approve - Motion to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9003
. (h) Consideration of Request To Rezone From R -3 To C -4 Property In Casa
Addition Along Texas Avenue And California Street By Jerry Bird with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve - Motion to waive first
reading of Ordinance and set second reading
(i) Consideration of Vacation of Utility Basement In Casa Addition with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first
reading of Ordinance and set second reading
(j) Consideration of Variance Requested By Clark Miller For Car Wash On
Highway 7 Bast (A &W Site) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve - Motion to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9004
(k) Consideration of Lot Split In Lot 1, Block 1, Casa Addition with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve lot split
(1) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By Roy Lund (Two Nile Radius)
with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County with no objection
3
CITY COUNCIL AGHHDA - NAY 23, 1989 .
(m) Discussion of Burger Bing Site Plan with Recommendation of Planning
Commission to Direct Staff to Begin Process of Downzoning Property
Action -
(n) Consideration of Jay Freedland Fence Proposal with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve
(o) Consideration of BRV Update with Recommendation of Planning Commission
to Authorize Bill Veber to Prepare Zoning Ordinance for Codification
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve
(p) Consideration of Airport Fixed Base Operator (FBO) Contract with Tom
Parker with Recommendation of City Airport Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve and enter into agreement
(q) Consideration of Agreement Between City of Hutchinson And Engineer for
Professional Service
Action - Notion to reject - Notion to approve and enter into agreement
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Notion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
4
0
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHIMSOZ CITY CODICIL
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carle, John Mlinar,
and Marlin Torgersson. Absent: Alderman Pat Mikulecky. Also present: City
Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Consultant Engineer Marlow V. Priebe and City
Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Lavern Johnson.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of April 25, 1989 and bid opening of
April 24, 1989 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - APRIL 1989
2. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES - MARCH 23 AND APRIL 11, 1989
3. POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES - APRIL 26, 1989
4. FINANCIAL REPORT - MARCH 1989
(b) SHORT -TERM 1101 SALE" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
HUTCHINSON HUSKIES BASEBALL ASSN. AT VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK CONCESSION
STAND FOR KAY - AUGUST 1989
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman xlinar
and unanimously carried, to order report and minutes filed and issue
the license.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY PRUDENTIAL TO OFFER CITY EMPLOYEES 457
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS AS VOLUNTARY PAYROLL DEDUCTION
The motion was made by Alderman xlinar, seconded by Alderman Carle and
unanimously carried, to approve.
is (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO OPERATE FOOD CONCESSION IN LIBRARY SQUARE
DURING SUMMER MONTHS
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 9, 1989 •
The owner of Peter's Restaurant requested permission to sell food in
Library Square or in front of his establishment at various times. Fol-
lowing discussion, Alderman Carle moved to defer to the next meeting
for additional information from the City Attorney. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY, INC. TO USE CIVIC
ARENA AND RECREATION CENTER FACILITIES FOR COMPANY PICNIC ON JULY 15
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the request and
seconded by Alderman Carle. Motion amended by Alderman Carle to waive
the deadline of 10:00 P.M. for liquor in the park and extend set -ups
until 11:00 P.M. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unani-
mously carried. Main motion carried unanimously.
(d) DISCUSSION OF STATUS OF TRAILER REMOVAL AT MIDVEST TRAILER COURT
Attorney Anderson reported that the Court would sign the order on Fri-
day (May 12) that the City may begin removing the trailers from the
premises within the next week.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON ASSEMBLY OF COD CHURCH TO USE
LIBRARY SQUARE ON JULY 16, 1989 FOR OUTDOOR CONCERT
Motion made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unani-
mously carried, to approve the request.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 8998 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carle
and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8998.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL FEES FOR R.C.N. CONTRACT
(DEFERRED APRIL 25, 1989)
Following discussion, Alderman Carle moved to approve and pay the bill.
Notion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF T.A. 15 SOUTH LEFT -TURN LANE PLAN AND ACCESS PLAN IN
VICINITY OF SOUTH END OF LYNN ROAD
Engineer Priebe reviewed the proposed plans and drawings for the
project. Following discussion, Alderman Carle moved to request per-
mission from the State to construct a left -turn lane off T.H. 15 at
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 9, 1989
0
Clinton and for an indeterminate period of time the south end of Lynn
Road to be left open but not at an angle and leave the median on South
Grade Road in place. Notion seconded by Alderman Xlinar and unani-
mously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF NEV DIMENSION PLATING LOAN TO COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT FUND
Mr. DuVayne Peterson, Chairman of the HCDC Finance Committee, presented
the recommendation of HCDC to enter into an agreement with Community
Reinvestment Fund to purchase the loan the City has with New Dimension
Plating, subject to a review by the City Attorney regarding recourse,
to be effective June 1, 1989.
Following discussion, Alderman Xlinar moved to approve the sale and
enter into an agreement, with the City Attorney to check that there is
no recourse. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously car-
ried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF HUTCHXOBILE SCHEDULE AND POLICIES
Following discussion, Alderman Carls made the motion, seconded by Ald-
erman Nlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the schedule and poli-
cies.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF MAIN STREET HAMMERS
Following discussion, Alderman Nlinar moved to approve the 32 banners
on Main Street. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously
carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AVARDING BID FOR NURSING HOME REVENUE BOND
Bond Consultant Bill Fahey and Larry Graf, Nursing Home Board Chairman,
recommended awarding the bid to Miller Securities, Inc. Following dis-
cussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve the sale
and award the bid to Miller Securities, Inc. and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8999 with the recommended changes. Notion second-
ed by Alderman Xlinar and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF YOUTH CENTER LOCATION AND CONCEPT OF SIX -XONTH TRIAL
PERIOD
The Council was presented with a petition containing approximately 150
signatures of youth in the community. Mr. Jim Mills, Community Educa-
tion Director, presented a proposal for a youth center in the former
Spanky's facility. Several youth spoke in support of the center.
Following lengthy discussion, it was determined to renegotiate the
terms with the owner of the facility. Alderman Carls moved that the
City make a tentative commitment of $2,500 a month up to a period of
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 9, 1989 0
six months to fund the youth center and activities associated with it.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar. Alderman Carle amended the motion
to include a management plan with a youth counsel. Amended motion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. Main motion
carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF OFFER FOR ASSESSMENT PAYMENTS ON ANDERSON /BEELER
PROPERTY
Following discussion of payments on deferred assessments, Alderman Tor -
gerson moved to reduce the interest rate to three percent and compute
the figures to make an offer to the owner. Motion seconded by Alderman
Carls and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING SETTLEMENT REGARDING KORNGIEBEL/PINSKE
LITIGATION
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to accept the settlement of
$812.10 for the pending litigation on the recreation center /pool. No-
tion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND LEAGUE INSURANCE
TRUST .
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the settle-
ment agreement of $9,514.41 with League Insurance Trust. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Miinar and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF RENTAL/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FROM GOPHER STATE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve option one for
550 /month.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING NEGOTIATED BID FOR $500,000 IN FINANCING FOR
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Administrator Philip Graves and Finance Director Frank Seivert present-
ed the proposal and Resolution authorizing the issuance of a Hospital
Revenue Note in the amount of $500,000 over a five -year period. It was
recommended to award the sale of the revenue note to First Midwest
Lease Corporation.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the recommenda-
tion and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9000, conditioned upon
final approval by the City Attorney and Bond Counsel Briggs 8 Morgan.
Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO DO CALCIUM CHLORIDE TREATMENT ON LES KOUBA
PARKWAY IN 1989
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - HAY 9, 1989
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve treatment on
Les Rouba Parkway at City cost and the Clifton Heights area at cost to
the residents. Motion seconded by Alderman Carle and unanimously
carried.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF FIRE DEPARTMENT SELLING EXCESS EQUIPMENT
Following discussion, Alderman Carle made the motion, seconded by Ald-
erman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve advertising the ex-
cess equipment for sale.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF PERMANENT PART -TIME POSITION IN FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Following discussion, Alderman Nlinar moved to approve the position.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carle and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz commented on the six proposals received to
renovate City Hall. It was the consensus of the Council to interview
three of the firms on May 23, 1989 starting at 4:30 P.M., at half -hour
intervals.
Mr. Plotz stated that the uneven sidewalk along Main Street was part of
the State project, which was paid for by them.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar commented about temporary posts on Third Avenue. He
thought there should be signs along the railroad to prevent anyone from
driving into the river.
Alderman Nlinar expressed concern about the parking lot located at the
bowling alley site. He wondered what would happen to the parking for
the remainder of the building if bowling alley portion of the building
is being sold.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson inquired about the status of the house and excava-
tion fill on the Hornick property. The City Attorney reported that be
bad prepared an order for signature by the Mayor and City Administra-
tor which will be served upon the property owner.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CONSULTANT ENGINEER MARLOV V. PRIEBE
Engineer Priebe commented that there would be a report on the hook -up
charges for the May 23 Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL XIIUTES - XAY 9, 1989 0
It was reported that the Engineering Department had inspected the con-
dition of the sod on Hain Street between Fourth Avenue and Fifth Ave-
nue. Engineer Priebe stated the damage was due to salt, etc., from
winter weather conditions, and it was not the contractor's fault. If
the area were to be resodded, it would still be under the estimated
cost for the project.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROX CITY ATTORNEY
Attorney Anderson requested Council approval of the settlement and
easement with Delmer and Doris Sturges regarding the ditch dispute.
Following discussion, Alderman Carla moved to approve. Notion seconded
by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYXENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Carla, seconded by Alderman Minar, to
approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Xotion unan-
imously carried.
12. ADJOURIXENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:19 P.X.
0
E
0
0
MI17TBS
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, MAY 9, 1989
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.X.
Also present were Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson and Bond Consultant
Bill Fahey of Ehlers & Associates.
The following bids were opened for the $830,000 Nursing Home Revenue Bonds,
Series 1989, for the City of Hutchinson:
ACCOUNT MANAGER
Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Yost, Inc
Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc.
Killer Securities, Inc.
Moore, Juran & Company, Inc.
The bids were referred to Bill Fahey for review
2:05 P.M.
INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
5653,345.00 8.0809
697,682.50 8.6293
639,195.00 7.9059
680,050.00 8.4112
The meeting adjourned at
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, MAY 15, 1989
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.X.
Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 3986, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No, 4,
Project No. 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12 was dispensed with. The following bids
were opened and read:
W. Mueller b Sons, Inc.
Hamburg, XN $88,133.00
Baueriy Bros., Inc.
Sauk Rapids, MN 84,970.06
Mid Minnesota Hot Mix
Annandale, IN 81,759.56
The bids were referred to the Engineering Department for review.
The bid opening adjourned at 2:05 P.M.
A.
E
E
e
APRIL
0 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1989 APRIL
APRIL YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
TAXES
0.00
26378.46
1278791.00
1252412.54
2.1%
LICENSES
1825.00
9247.50
19825.00
10577.50
46.6%
PERMITS AND FEES
5331.67
15484.76
90000.00
74515.24
17.2%
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
0.00
110289.42
1549218.00
1438928.58
7.1%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
35798.62
124964.97
515362.00
390397.03
24.2%
FINES & FORFEITS
3731.72
12511.19
35500.00
22988.81
35.2%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
8581.88
36181.36
156556.00
120374.64
23.1%
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
7.00
75007.00
426000.00
350993.00
17.6%
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
288.28
283.54
200.00
-83.54
141.8%
TOTAL
55564.17
410348.20
4071452.00
3661103.80
10.1%
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
1971.86
11867.99
32940.00
21072.01
36.0%
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
10243.65
51067.30
141512.00
90444.70
36.1%
ELECTIONS
0.00
0.00
2768.00
2768.00
0.0%
FINANCE
19208.76
80375.25
225914.00
145538.75
35.6%
MOTOR VEHICLE
5531.01
23768.78
64074.00
40305.22
37.1%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
20700.00
20700.00
0.0%
LEGAL
2696.00
10398.25
41000.00
30601.75
25.4%
PLANNING
1145.40
6523.94
12475.00
5951.06
52.3%
CITY HALL
1989.17
12058.94
41856.00
29197.06
28.8%
RECREATION BUILDING
3249.13
14051.28
57366.00
43314.72
24.5%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
58751.10
302186.75
836667.00
534480.25
36.1%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
2966.40
26533.41
104915.00
78381.59
25.3%
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
1965.22
9112.55
30482.00
21369.45
29.9%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
0.00
0.00
22039.00
22039.00
0.0%
BUILDING INSPECTION
4572.02
21686.96
61908.00
40221.04
35.0%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
157.50
157.50
13238.00
13080.50
1.2%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.0%
FIRE MARSHALL
3009.44
15506.41
50840.00
35333.59
30.5%
ENGINEERING
14517.62
64107.39
224454.00
160346.61
28.6%
STREETS & ALLEYS
33097.29
121871.55
366040.00
244168.45
33.3%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
3757.50
18527.58
89900.00
71372.42
20.6%
LIBRARY
678.07
31952.49
68791.00
36838.51
46.4%
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
10276.59
26595.04
82860.00
56264.96
32.1%
PARK /REC. ADMIN.
3607.70
22891.49
95151.00
72259.51
24.1%
RECREATION
5689.08
31180.07
153472.00
122291.93
20.3%
CIVIC ARENA
8710.66
56762.61
112411.00
55648.39
50.5%
PARK DEPARTMENT
22801.31
105312.77
409116.00
303803.23
25.7%
CEMETERY
3076.88
14144.49
49132.00
34987.51
28.8%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2221.23
11095.42
33150.00
22054.58
33.5%
DEBT SERVICE
8500.00
13000.00
57000.00
44000.00
22.8%
:AIRPORT
112856.45
116423.74
55075.00
- 61348.74
211.4%
6080.88
31364.93
129016.00
97651.07
24.3%
.TRANSIT
ENERGY COUNCIL
3023.98
10298.08
30000.00
19701.92
34.3%
S.C.D.P. COORDINATRO
2230.71
15068.45
0.00
- 15068.45
0.0%
UNALLOCATED
96735.32
128875.36
355040.00
226164.64
36.3%
TOTAL 455317.93 1404766.77 4071452.00 2666685.23 34.5%
;I-e?, 1/4
D 081461
0 REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1989 APRIL
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
LIQUOR SALES
31142.14
127473.22
447800.00
320326.78
WINE SALES
8656.56
34911.79
160300.00
125388.21
BEER SALES
49522.65
182097.12
700300.00
518202.88
BEER DEPOSITS
- 114.09
- 251.38
0.00
251.38
MISC. SALES
2510.35
9582.99
45000.00
35417.01
INTEREST
493.87
1649.11
5600.00
3950.89
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
- 121.95
- 228.04
- 2800.00
- 2571.96
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS
CAPITAL OUTLAY
TRANSFERS
COST OF SALES
• OTHER
TOTAL
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
WATER SALES
WATER '.METER SALES
REFUSE SERVICES
SEWER SERVICES
EPA SALES
PENALTY CHARGES
INTEREST EARNED
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
OTHER
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
92089.53 355234.81 1356200.00 1000965.19
8952.25
47275.15
133169.00
85893.85
40.75
238.29
4700.00
4461.71
3005.87
6706.66
39800.00
33093.34
3.00
3.00
8900.00
8897.00
450.00
1238.32
29000.00
27761.68
0.00
0.00
110000.00
110000.00
65834.50
260629.69
1032600.00
771970.31
0.00
0.00
- 2300.00
- 2300.00
78286.37 316091.11 1355869.00 1039777.89
28.5%
21.8%
26.0%
29.4%
26.2%
35.5%
5.1%
16.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.2%
0.0%
23.3%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
010%
35236.90
152389.62
506000.00
353610.38
30.1%
625.00
3990.30
6500.00
2509.70
61.4%
29607.50
132299.75
412000.00
279700.25
32.1%
117269.16
445254.05
1147000.00
701745.95
38.8%
0.00
0.00
0.00
1861134.44
39.4%
1160.61
4785.01
11000.00
6214.99
0.0%
6767.39
26945.38
60000.00
33054.62
44.9%
111.00
1913.32
2000.00
86.68
0.0%
100.69
20059.69
2000.00
- 18059.69
1003.0%
190878.25 787637.12 2146500.00 1358862.88 36.7%
REFUSE
37299.80
179724.30
411438.00
231713.70
43.7%
22936.48
193076.99
853683.00
660606.01
22.6%
•WATER
S£rER
441937.93
779833.59
1805816.00
1025982.41
43.2%
WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT.
33647.92
57167.68
0.00
- 57167.68
TOTAL
535822.13
1209802.56
3070937.00
1861134.44
39.4%
110TCH I NSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
APRIL 18, 1989
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: 2:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM PARK TOWERS APARTMENTS
Chairman John Paulsen called the meeting to order.
Members present -John Paulsen, Don Krasen, Tammy Wendlandt,
Richard Peterson, Pat Mikulecky, and Jean Ward.
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF MARCH 21, 1989 REGULAR BOARD MEETING
There being no additions or corrections to the minutes, Pat
Mikulecky moved the minutes be approved as mailed. Richard
Peterson seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF ACCOUNTS FOR PARK TOWERS AND
HHRA GENERAL FUND
Disbursements included $455.22 to Anderson Interiors for craftroom
vertical blinds and border; $405.00 to Reid Floor Covering to
replace kitchen tile and recarpet elevators; and McLeod County
Auditor (PILOT) Payment in Lieu of Taxes. Don Krasen Moved that
the financial statements be approved as submitted. Pat Mikulecky
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
IV. SECTION 23 /PARK TOWERS PROJECT
1. The Annual Audit conducted by Betts 6 Hayes, Ltd. revealed
no findings.
2. Open House plans for Park Towers 15 year anniversary are being
finalized. Invitations have been sent out, speakers for the
program beginning at 2:00 P.M. are as follows: John Paulsen,
Reverand Thor Skeie, and Ancher Nelsen, craftroom remodeling
is scheduled to be finished by the Open House date and an
apartment to be shown to the public will be furnished by
Hennen's for a $75.00 rental fee. The Open House will be held
on Sunday, April 23, 1989 at 2:00 P.M.- 4:00 P.M.
3. The Director informed the Board that Park Towers currently
has four vacancies.
V. OTHER BUSINESS
1. Dorothy Knutson - Executive Director of the Willmar BRA
described the programs administered by their HRA.
2. The Director contacted Tom Kuhn at HUD for information on their
Section 202 Program. The program is designed for the very low
income ($10,850) elderly, handicapped or disabled individual.
Outside of the Twin Cities area, funds will be provided only for
the housing of the mentally ill.
3. The MHFA programs that the task force consisting of John
Paulsen, Tammy Wendlant, and Jean Ward recommends that the HRA
become involved in are as follows: Rehabilitation Loan Program,
Home Energy Loan Program, and Home Improvement Loan Program.
The First Bank of MN has recently become involved in the Home
Improvement Loan Program and the Home Energy Loan Program. The
Director was asked to contact the person in charge of these programs
4_� ?-60
Hutchinson HRA -Board Meeting Minutes, April 18, 1989
Page 2
at First Bank Minnesota and invite that person to our May Board
meeting.
4. Goals and Objectives were discussed with several areas mentioned
as being projects the HRA may want to become involved in. These
areas are as follows: 1.) Congregate Housing 2.) Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency Programs 3.) Hotel Project 4.) Family Housing (3- bedroc
5.) Meals at Park Towers. Board members were asked to study these
areas and amend and prioritize at the next HRA meeting.
Vl. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business Chairman John Paulsen declared the
meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director
Next regular meeting, May 16, 1989
Pat Mikulecky, Secretary /Treasurer 0
0
MINUTES
• HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
Monday, May 1, 1989
Meeting called to order by Chairman Doug McGraw at 8:10 p.m.
Members present: Chairman Doug McGraw, Mayor Paul Ackland, John Miller, Don
Pankake, Dennis Kahl and Dave Skaar.
Motion made by Dave Skaar, Seconded by John Miller to rescind the motions passed
at the Airport Commission meeting dated Monday, April 17, 1989, and for the
hangar rental rates to remain as previously stated $125.00 per month for the (2)
two new enclosed large hangars, $75.00 per month for the (6) six new enclosed
small hangars, $45.00 per month on old enclosed hangars and $25.00 per month on
the open hangars, also that out of town renters be charged the surcharge of
$10.00 additional for the enclosed hangars and $5.00 additional for the open
hangars. The motion passed 4 to 2 with Doug McGraw and Dennis Kahl voting
against the motion.
See attached copy of Airport Commission minutes from April 17th, 1989, meeting.
The five year capital improvement program was reviewed and updated by the
Airport Commission. This report will be submitted to the state by Chairman Doug
McGraw.
Fred Steinhaus from Prior Lake, MN, gave a presentation concerning the FBO
. position at the Hutchinson Airport.
The next regular Airport Commission meeting will be held on May 30th, 1989, at
8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Meeting adjourned 11:45 p.m.
Submitted by Doug Meier
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
Monday, April 17, 1989 FOR YOUR INFORNAM
Meeting called to order by Chairman Doug McGraw at 8:00 p.m.
Members present: Chairman Doug McGraw, Don Pankake, Dennis Kahl, and Dave
Skaar.
Members absent: John Miller and Mayor Paul Ackland.
Motion made by Dave Skaar, seconded by Doug McGraw to establish the hangar rent
at $75.00 per month for the new small hangars and $125.00 per month on the (2)
two new large hangars and also to eliminate the additional hangar rent surcharge
for out of town residents. The old hangar rent is to remain as is. The motion
passed unanimously. NOTE: See Hangar Cost Analysis submitted by Ken Merrill.
Motion made by Dennis Kahl, seconded by Don Pankake to delete free hangar rent
for the Civil Air Patrol (C.A.P.) due to revenue required for hangar payments.
The C.A.P. will retain their priority on the hangar waiting list and the $50.00
hangar deposit required to be on hangar list has been waived for the C.A.P.
only. The motion passed 3 to 1 with Dave Skaar voting against the motion.
Tom Parker indicated to the commission that he was available for the FBO
position at the Hutchinson Airport.
Next Airport Commission meeting will be held on May 1, 1989, at 8:00 p.m.
Meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Submitted by Doug Meier
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 18, 1989
0 1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m, with
the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, Marlin Torgerson,
ElRoy Dobratz, Larry Romo, Tom Lyke and Chairman Craig. Also present: Building
Official Jim Marka and City Attorney Barry Anderson. Chairman Craig opened the
meeting by welcoming Mr. E1Roy Dobratz unto the Planning Commission.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated
Tuesday, March 21, 1989. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF EXTENDING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CLARK
MILLER ON THE A & W RESTAURANT SITE
Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend approval of the extention to City
Council, seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OT "MAC SUBDIVISION" (2 mile radius)
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat to
City Council, seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF BEGINNING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ON TRACT NI SECTION
1 LYNN TOWNSHIP OFF OF SOUTH GRADE RD.
Mr. Ron Hansen, affected property owner, voiced his opposition to the
proposal for many reasons with the main concern being the tax
increase.
Mr. Warren Nelson, property owner, stated opposition concerning his
lot being locked -in from Dale St. and Kay St.
Building Official Jim Marka explained staff recommendations for the
annexation.
Mr. Hansen commented on the fact everything has been platted around
his property that can be platted.
Discussion followed on the prior annexing of the surrounding property.
Mrs. Ron Hansen commented on the annexation proceedings. Discussion
followed on "forced annexation ".
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the issue of the
Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Craig commented on the property and the
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/18/89
usage of metered water out -side city limits. •
City Attorney Barry Anderson stated the city could provide services
outside the city siting two possible problems:
1) collection problems could exsist
2) property should be brought into the city for servicing
utilities
Attorney Anderson also commented on the uniqueness of this situation.
Discussion followed on the effect of deferred assessments.
Mr. Ebent moved not to proceed with the annexation, seconded by Mr.
Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF BEGINNING (REVISED) ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ON THE
MCDONALD PROPERTY
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the revised
annexation to City Council, seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried
unanimously.
(e) DISCUSSION OF DOUG YERKS RECYCLING PROPOSAL
There was no discussion since Mr. Yerks was not present. Mr.
Torgerson moved to continue discussion when appropriate information is
provided. Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried unanimously.
5. OLD BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF BURGER KING SITE
Building Official Marka stated it has been one year, ten months since
the original plan and rezoning. He commented on information and
promises from Mr. Hornick on his plan.
City Attorney Anderson commented on the following:
1) a pretrial set in May
2) frustration with Mr. Hornick and his promises
3) filing a Chapter 463 proceeding to fill the open excavation to
the north of Gas and Grocery
4) Mr. Hornick's conversations stating development proceedings
are beginning with Burger King
5) look at the long -term zoning plan, BRW may propose commercial
zoning of the property
6) consider the possibility of the development agreement and
possible down - zoning.
Discussion followed on the removal of the house on 35 - 4th Ave NW.
Mr. Craig Reese, neighboring property owner, voiced objection to
giving Mr. Hornick any more time.
2
0
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/18/89
Mr. Torgerson moved that the Planning Commission advise the City
Council that the yellow house located at 35 - 4th Ave. NW is in
violation of the Building Ordinances since it has been vacant more
than six months. The house is to be removed and the open excavation
filled by May 1, 1989, bringing the lot to a buildable status. Also,
the open excavation to the North of Gas and Grocery is to be filled
and restored to a buildable condition within 20 days of notice or the
city will fill at owners expense. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion
carried unanimously.
Discussion followed on the zoning of the property.
Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend that a site plan be available by
May 1, 1989, to be considered at the May 16, 1989, meeting or
downzoning of the property will begin. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the
motion carried unanimously.
(b) BRW UPDATE
Building Official Marka stated the proposal was more extensive than
the city needs. Discussion followed on contract zoning, and as the
growth in Hutchinson is slowing the zoning ordinance should possibly
be only partially reviewed.
(c) FREEDLAND FENCE PROPOSAL
Mr. Freedland was not present for discussion.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
Building Official Marka commented on the park land dedication fee by the
School. Discussion followed on the school having a public recreation area.
The item is to be discussed and recommendation made by the Park Board.
There will be a possible conditional use permit application submitted at
the May meeting regarding a Bed and Breakfast on Main St.
7. ADJOURMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
3
Ilk. HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - April 18, 1989
Large Conference Room - 5:30 PM
Present: Dori Johnson, Vice President; Diane Gilmer, Secretary; Rev Thor Skeie,
Trustee; Dr. Robert Hegrenes, Chief of Medical Staff; Rich Myers,
Trustee; Mike Carls, Trustee
Absent: Bob Durfee, President
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator; Francis P. Seivert, Director of
Finance; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Gib Lehman,
Construction Coordinator; Robyn Erickson, Director of Education and
Marketing; Pat Halverson, Director of Mental Health Services; Cathy
Nevanen, Hutchinson Leader; Bob Walters, KDUZ /KKJR Radio; Laurie
Hulkonen, Recording Secretary
The meeting was called to order at 5:50 PM by Vice President Johnson.
Minutes of Past Meetings. Minutes of the March 21, 1989, regular meeting were
approved as presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Hegrenes, to approve the
March 21, 1989, minutes of the regular meeting of the Board of
Directors. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes. Minutes of the March Medical Staff meeting and
the Executive Committee meeting were presented by Dr. Hegrenes.
New Business
A. Physician Recruitment Committee. The Board reviewed minutes of the
meeting of the Physician Recruitment Committee. The Committee
recommendations to hire a second staff psychiatrist and discuss an
arrangement with Dr. John Fluegel for psychiatric services were received.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Gilmer, to authorize the hiring
of a second staff psychiatrist and discuss an agreement with Dr. John
Fluegel for psychiatric services. All were in favor. Motion carried.
It was noted that the Committee will begin recruitment efforts, as well, for
a physician to replace Dr. Craig Belcourt at the Dassel Clinic, who will
leave the practice at the end of June. The Board expressed their
appreciation for Dr. Belcourt's considerable efforts in building the
practice in Dassel.
B. Medical Staff Applications. A recommendation from the Executive Committee
of the Medical Staff for appointment of five weekend Emergency Room
physicians was received. Credentials were reviewed. Following discussion:
— ( —(5-) `
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/18/89
Page Two
B. Medical Staff Privileges (continued)
Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Myers, to grant consulting staff
privileges to Christine I. Traxler, MD; Dana S. Mann, MD; Richard A.
Chilgren, MD; Paul E. Thompson, MO; and David R. Hartden, MD. All were
in favor. Motion carried.
C. Medical Office Building Progress. An update on the Hutchinson Medical
Center's planning process was heard. The physician group expects to receive
results of the process within the next six -to -eight weeks. A decision on
their preference to remain in their present location or move to a new clinic
building will be reached and brought to the board. This decision will
direct the Hospital's next step in the expected overall remodeling /expansion
project.
D. Ambulance Garage. A proposal to build a new six -stall ambulance and service
vehicle garage south of the present garage was presented. A larger garage
is needed because of the size of the new ambulance to be delivered next
week. One row of parking spaces in the South employee parking lot would be
lost.
The Hospital currently has four garage stalls which are used to house the
/ two ambulances, the pick -up, and a station wagon; garage space is being
rented for the Hospital's van.
The present garage will be remodeled to serve as storage space for the
Purchasing Department. Supplies are currently delivered and moved to the
lower level; the main level storage space will allow more efficient
materials management.
This item was considered for board action in tandem with the request for
additional employee parking.
E. Additional Parking. A proposal to expand parking space South and East of
the Hospital was next considered. The current South parking lot would be
expanded by an additional 50 parking spaces, and an additional lot
containing 141 parking spaces, at an approximate cost of $1,000 per space,
is planned for employee and possibly patient use (depending on the final
location of the Medical Center).
The board questioned why the proposed East parking lot allowed access from
Century Avenue but did not access freemont Avenue. Concern was relayed that
access from both streets might encourage people to use the parking area as a
thoroughfare to drive from one street to another, rather than driving around
the Medical Office Building and Hospital. Accompanying concerns for patient
and employee safety and prevention of nuisance noise have been discussed
with City officials, who have informed the Hospital of their desire for
access from both streets.
L
0
llke� Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/18/89
Page Three
E. Additional Parking (continued)
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Carls, seconded by Myers, to request authority from
the City Council to proceed with construction of a six -stall ambulance
garage and expansion of parking to provide 50 additional spaces in the
South parking lot and 141 additional parking spaces in an East parking
lot. All were in favor. Motion carried.
F. First Ouarter Status Report. The first quarter status report on 1989
institutional objectives was reviewed. No unusual comments were made.
The first quarter status on 1989 Governing Board objectives was reviewed.
No unusual comments were made.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to accept the status
reports as presented.
Skeie expressed his appreciation for the work done by the Hospital's
Administrator and staff in the level of achievement toward reaching these
objectives.
G. Board Education Opportunities. The board members present were reminded of
three upcoming education opportunities, including the LifeSpan annual
meeting on April 27; the National Trustee Conference in Orlando, FL, in
June; and the State Trustee Conference taking place July 7 -9 at Arrowwood.
Anyone interested in attending the conferences were asked to contact Graves
for further registration information.
H. Other. No other items were discussed.
Statistical Report. The statistical report for March was reviewed. Occupancy
for the month was 51 %. Average daily census was 34.2, up almost five patients
per day over previous months and one year ago. Average length of stay was five
days. Admissions were down by 4.5% from one year ago.
Accounts Payable. The accounts payable were presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Gilmer, to approve the attached
listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements in the amount of
$945,896.84. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Financial Statements. The financial statements were presented. For the second
time, the Hospital exceeded $1 million in gross patient revenues. Net patient
revenues were $907,000. Operating income for the month was $101,095.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. Minutes of the February and March Auxiliary meetings
were presented. No unusual comments were made.
�3 �
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/18/89 is
Four
Patient Satisfaction Surveys. Surveys received since the last meeting were
reviewed by those present. No unusual comments were made.
AdJournment. Motion was made by Carls to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was
adjourned at 7:20 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
LA ulkonen Diane Gilmer
Recording Secretary Secretary
LH
i
IV,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
LAST YEAR COMPARISONS - NATURAL CATEGORIES
For Four Months Ended April 30, 1989
CURRENT PERIOD YEAR -TO -DATE
1988 1989 VARIANCE PATIENT REVENUE 1988 1989 VARIANCE
Daily Hospital Service
S 190,082 S 247,125 $ 57,043 Medical Nursing Units
78,060 90,033 11,973 Mental Health Unit
562.120 747.662 185.542 Ancillary
S 830,262 $1,084,820 $ 254,558 Gross Patient Revenue
( 92.902) (122.294) (29.392) Less: Discounts & Allow
S 737,360 S 962,526 $ 225,166 Net Patient Revenue
16.370 24.020 7.650 Other Operating Revenue
S 753.730 $ 986.546 $ 232.816 Total Operating Revenue
C
S 315,109 S 408,989 $ 93,880
56,088
82,202
26,114
50,570
76,422
25,852
11,555
11,610
55
22,875
30,374
7,499
95,429
95,436
7
13,983
13,234
(749)
12,180
7,429
(4,751)
4,309
7,980
3,671
8,159
8,802
643
293
1,209
916
24,211
29,573
5,362
14.636
13.466
(1.170)
OPERATING EXPENSES
Salaries
Employee Benefits
Medical & Other Fees
Raw Food
Drugs
Medical & Other Supplies
Utilities
Building & Equipment
Rental Expense
Insurance
Interest
Depreciation
Other Expenses
S 724,473 $ 919,646 S 195,173
254,535
343,313
88,778
2,154,430
2,740,886
586.456
44,651
50,730
6,079
$3,133,438
$4,003,845 S
870,407
(369,654)
(512,736)
(143,082)
70,197
69,605
(592)
$2,763,784
$3,491,109 $
727,325
74,398
96,519
22,121
$2,838,182
53,581,628 S
749,446
$1,250,809 $1,570,877 S 320,068
231,926
307,268
75,342
156,621
286,715
130,094
44,651
50,730
6,079
88,639
105,386
16,747
351,790
372,288
20,498
70,197
69,605
(592)
Repairs 32,343
28,861
(3,482)
15,850
24,685
8,835
33,953
35,903
1,950
5,392
5,492
100
97,794
113,548
15,754
72.819
74.898
2.079
S 629.397 S 786.726 S 157.329 Total Operating Expense $2.452.784 $3.046.256 S 593.472
S 124,333 $ 199,820 f 75,487 Operating Income S 385,398 S 541,372 S 155,974
Add (Deduct)
Non- Operatina Revenue (Expense)
Price -Level Depreciation
(32.675) (40.0231 (7.348) And Working Capital (130,700) (160.092) (29.392)
91.658 S 159.797 S 68.139 Excess Revenue Over Exp. $ _254.698 S 381.280 S 126.58
riiLASTYR.ARP
(5
1
0
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
PHONE 617 - 2866158 LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION
333 SIBLEY a STr PAUL, MN 56101
APPLICATION FOR CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY ISET UPI PERMIT
PERMIT FEE $150.00
5442 IF NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN ARE
PUBLIC
NOT CORRECT, MAKE CHANGES IN
SPACES BELOW
Little Crow Bowling Lanes Inc.
Hwy 7 We Box 2U3
Hutchinson, MN 5535U
NOTE: ALL CLUB'ON -SALE[ INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSEE'S ARE EXEMPT FROM APPLYING.
nPr. 9:'n— ii:•Tr�jno �lr— ;i:edrne. cam --
1 Nain• o• 9�A
7L�1 U
( C�'Lt .l'CL.aJ_�1nrSya
tlu,nell S
//lr•• Paarl.<or BO. unn,
State
`L(
K")rt7'�Cia YI ✓1. J�250
P Ami TTT P •N <•
�p ea•. uon(reie. r•nl,
Lgndnl<Sun.M<
L_JRi.•1•Clu. &1
(i IN re
C r
Clup M•na
//
</9t
Maw•<f 11Mnapar
R.'-ou-1
�✓.��
Aware al owns
�o F' �.� l)uOTHER
UINESS ESTABLISHMENT! f'I R
Its.., LJNa
TO THIS BUSINESS FOR HIS LOCATIONr L,. LI 1
(�Y., nNn
IS YPPLIC AI'i -I,ON V
ORIGINYL I RFNFwgL'I<l. TRgNSiER❑
Ii TRAN$ R, OPM R LICENSEES NAME AND BUSINESS TRADE NAME
FOR A PUBLIC BUSINESS:
R a PaNnerM•o. State the Name and A• nHi of Ewh Pa•tmr: Ile Corlwration, Stale IM Name and Aallnaf nt Exh 011irrr
sa.
rY�r
3Jfr a r ^ � <<e
P.rin.gD�r[e•
Ph1r% �Pil4+H ✓�
Aadr n
Qi
tluf..eH nlnlp.11lor
AadNH
FOR APRIVATE CLUB
<H Clue reania•d
Nump•r of Mlmperf Amoonl of DWf M•mpNMla Rpui••m• tle
m9 n n up
AI Pr•Hnt L [algn'
b CIUD Bulltlin9
Own•a or R•nfro!
Dorf CIUD Maml•in Lnabn
Fw nMmbrl 10 $1.I t-1
n. ❑Nn
Pp mur n•Dm •m•
ged.m
wp r .<arr n...r Nam•
Aaa.a•
auo 011-11111.0.1 Name
wameH
Has applicant; if partnership, any partner; it corporation, any officer or director; if club, any club officer or director, ever
had a license under the Minnesota Liquor Control Act revoked or suspended or been convicted for any violation of State
Laws or local ordinances; if so, give date and details
cae nnr nmle Ina, me dand" nua of "own knowledge add uMe.... W the, Ina B,., of INU mlarmaaon or In 9wlNre to T„a wNmnl mfwn idde.
nnuuf uuH Iw n.au0on of Mn o.•mn. ANY PERMIT ISSUED HEREUNDER DOES NOT ALLOW THE SAL E'INTOAICATING LIQUOR.
NO CONSIDERATION WILL BE GIVEN TO THIS APPLICATION
UNLESS APPROVED AS PROVIDED BELOW: _ .
IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A COUNTY •1811- AB N rcMrl par.
IF A CLUB ATTACH A COPY OF THE CONSTITUTION AND
APO•naa cnu•wrwn coPnh aqua or R•andeam.B[• Dal. BYLAWS OF THE CLUB AND A CURRENT LIST OF
MEMBERS.
IF THE BUSINESS IS LOCATED IN A MUNICIPALITY
CASH
APwom] Ceum,l Pr,od•ntm ReP�IHntaluf 0
CHECK
P$ 9Wl lr MI
W-1-1
0
0
EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1989
AFFIDAVIT
n.'ee '7" ode, e- .r AM OVER 65 YEARS
OF AGE, OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN:
FAMILY SIZE
�l
2
INCOME
$?,560
$9,180
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF$11,05 FOR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE WOULD
IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION;
OF THE CHARGE TO $1,50,
SIGNATURE
STREET ADDRESS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
To: WATER DEPARTMENT
DATE S1 ' li 9 ACCOUNT NUMBER -26 0 - b
DATA CHANGE
To: CITY COUNCIL DATE
COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, MAY 11TH, 1989, AND ON
THURSDAY, MAY18THo 1989.
NOTICE OF HEARING
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 89 -03
Publication No. 3994
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the
23rd day of May, 1989, to consider the making of an improvement of the
Downtown Area of Hutchinson between Franklin Street and Hassan Street from the
Crow River to 4th Avenue South by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain, Service Leads, Sprinkler Systems and Appurtenances, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be
assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property
owners shall receive mailed notice.
The estimated City /State Cost of said improvement is $762,785.00, with an
estimated Assessable Cost of $59,215.00, for the Total Estimated Cost of
$822,000.00
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement
will be heard at this meeting.
Dated: May 9th, 1989 �A.u4?lt
City Adkinist tor
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, Wfflrn= YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION-
0
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 9008
PROJECT NO. 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 25th day of
April, 1989, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of
the Uptown Area of Hutchinson between Franklin Street and Hassan Street from
the Crow River to 4th Avenue South by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain, Service Leads, Sprinkler Systems and Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon
on the 23rd day of May, 1989, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 25th day of April, 1989.
2. The Director of Engineering is hereby designated as the Engineer for
this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of
such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
Mayor
City Administrator
61 '
`J
James G. DeMeyer 1004 Highway 15 South
• P.O. Box 428
Hwchinwm Mwwaota 55350
Telephone: 612/587,3191
REQUEST THAT THIS COMMUNICATION
BE READ AT THE MAY 23 PUBLIC HEARING
May 23, 1989
T0: Mayor, Aldermen and/or City Clerk AY 1989
City of Hutchinson�y lr.D a
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350 By 'r -tip
FROM: James G. DeMeyer Ci68L3
364 Larson Street
P.O. Box 4.2.8
Hutchinson,,MN 55350
You are hereby notified that objection is made in connection with
Letting #3, Project # 89 -03, Downtown Sprinkling.
In reviewing the article "Counsel adjusts assessment plan to reduce
sprinkling costs to businesses ", Hutchinson Leader dated 4 /27/89,
. Page 6A, reference is made that $252,500 would came from the City
water fund, that $25,000 would cane from the City sewer fund, and that
the City cost is $12,000 as it relates to the downtown sprinkling
project, with a public hearing scheduled for 8:00 p.m., May 23, 1989.
I have not received a notice of an assessment regarding this arrangement.
It continues to be the same rhetoric. The cotmunity not only has given up
large amounts of taxes from the tax base for the downtown area but now, as
I understand the article, we again are reaching out and taxing the citizens
of Hutchinson by taking from the water and sewer fund. The $12,000 cost
stated, in my judgment, can be a tangible cost which I have no objections to.
Recent developments and activities by the Council, in my judgment, are
not giving the citizens specific notice of what is going on and what
effects this type of government will have on our city 5 -10 years from
now. It seems as though too many in public office today feel it is
a privilege and they do not have to be accountable for what they
obviously feel are dumb citizens. The machinery developed which makes
many matters omplex and the average citizens left in the dark,
from my point of view, does not justify that elected officials extend
burdens to its citizens unjustly.
. C1James G`D`Myer� >
Received this 23rd Day of May, 1989
t
v
5
x
Council adjusts assessment plan to
reduce sprinkling costs to businesses
By JANE HODGINS
Staff Writer
Action Tuesday by the Hut-
chinson City Council carried the
city one step closer to a final
decision on downtown base-
ment sprinkling
The long- debated issue
became a topic when the Min-
nesota State Fire Code man-
dated that commercial
basements exceeding 1,500
square feet in size must be
equipped with sprinkling
devices.
Aimed at diminishing proper-
ty loss in the event of fire, com-
pliance with the mandate was
accompanied by a price many
downtown merchants said they
couldn't pay.
The city's application for a
Small Cities Development grant
was originally intended to pro-
vide financial assistance to mer-
chants installing the devices.
While the grant provided fun-
ding for other downtown
revitalization efforts, the
amount of funding alloted in the
grant to sprinkling was drastical-
ly reduced from the original ap-
plication.
Prior to Tuesday's meeting
with the council, members of
the Hutchinson Community
Development Corp. (HCDC)
finance committee met in an ef-
fort to find a way to reduce a
proposed assessment of $85,000
to be split among the 49 proper-
ty owners with basements ex',
ceeding the 1,500 'square-foot
limit. The group also sought to
reduce the amount of a propos-
ed deferred assessment of
$87,500 which was to be divided
among 38 property owners with
smaller basements and who are
not legally required to install
sprinklers.
The' finance committee
ultimately determined . that
money in the city's revolving
loan fund, which was already
calculated to provide $238,000
for the project, could be used to
offset decreases in the
assessments.
According to the HCDC pro-
DOWNTOWN SPRINKLING
i
Total Estimated Cost: $822,000
Funding Sources:
City revolving loan $373,285
City water fund $252,500
SCDG funding*
Assessable g6st $37,215
City sewer fund
$25,000
Property owners improvement — $22,000
City cost 1 $12,000
rr — Small Cities Development Grant
posal approved by the council,
money from the revolving loan
fund would allow the city to
reduce the active $85,000
assessment by $76,195, leaving
assessments to each property
owner at $300. The proposed
deferred assessment would be
reduced by $59,000, leaving that
assessment at $300 per property
as well The total assessable
cost of the project would 'be
$37,215.
According to the HCDC pro-
posal, $135,285 in additional
revolving loan funds would be
dedicated to the sprinkling pro-
ject.
The council approved the fun-
ding system with one amend-
ment relating to deferring
assessments for properties with
basements smaller than the size
affected by the fire code.
City,Attorney Barry Anderson
said that because the new water
service would not be exclusively
tot sprinkling, the city will be
able to prove benefit and col -
ldct the assessment. -
Property owners would be
assessed for the cost of the new
water entrance and installation
of a valve necessary to install a
sprinkling system.
Because the city succeeded in
significantly decreasing the cost
of the assessment, Alderman
Marlin Torgerson said he would
be in favor of making all
assessments on the project ac-
tive. The council concurred.
The sprinkling project is
estimated to cost $822,000. Fun-
ding sources include the Small
Cities grant, assessments against
property as well as a sliding
scale of improvement costs
charged to property owners,
money from the city's general
fund and water and sewer ac-
counts, and the revolving loan
fund.
The sliding scale hinges on in-
dividual property owners' par-
ticipation in revitalization ef-
forts. Property owners will be re-
quired to pay a per -foot cost of
the actual sprinkling system in-
stallation based on whether
they implement other renova-
tions.
A public hearing on the issue
is scheduled for 8 p.m. May 23.
•
11
Gamnu� I rcLm[
ALBERT LEA
ALEXANDRIA
ANOKA
AUSTIN
BEMIDA
BRAI NERD
BROOKL +N PARK
CANBY
DE?RO..* LAAE5
DULUTH
EAST GRAND FORKS
EDEN PRAIRIE
EVELETH
FARIBAULT
GRANITE FALLS
HIBBING
HUTCHINSSON
JACKSON
MANKATO
MINNE PGL5
MOORHEAD
FINE CITY
PIPESTONE
RED WING
ROCHESTER
ROSEMOUNT
ST CLOUD
ST PAUL
STAPLES
THEE RIVER FALLS
WABENA
WHITE BEAR LAKE
WILLMAR
WINONA
0
t I *w
Ainnesota Technical Institute System
aa•6o.ro of Vtica T E ",
strry
aa� aa�. • ase 1110
May 9, 1999
George Field, Fire Marsha(
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Field:
FOR YOUR INF_ORMAim
Thank you for your F.I.R.E. Center Information Request concerning inadvertent
discharge from Automatic Sprinklers. We answer more than a thousand questions
per year, and yours was a first. But I think we have found the answers you need.
Automatic Sprinkler activation, except in the case of a fire, is VERY rare. A
Federal Emergency Management Agency publication cites a National Fire Protection
Association survey which found an accidental discharge less than once per million
heads per year.
We also contacted the Automatic Sprinkler trade association and they cite an even
better record of one per SIXTEEN MILLION per Year. This translates to a building
with 10,000 sprinklers expecting one accidental discharge sometime in the next
1,600 years.
These figures do not allow for human - related" problems such as letting pipes freeze
Or (as you explained) mechanical damage through vibration and metal fatigue. Most
Automatic Sprinkler problems and failures are human-related ... the systems an
VERY reliable. . -`y't"
Many cities around the country require Automatic Sprinkler systems in all
below -grade areas. I have seen unsprinklered basement fires progress and
overwhelm firefighting forces just because the firefighters could not get within
range of the fire. The results were significant losses to the communities. I applaud
your council's efforts at improving.,Hutchinson's fire safety.
Regardless of the source of information, you can be assured that unwanted sprinkler
activations are very, VERY infrequent.
If we can be of any further help, please let me know.
Sincerely,
KifbyfliBfer, Fire Service Specialist
Fire Information Research & Education (F.I.R.E.) Center
(612) 296 -6516
An Equal Opportunity EDUCATOR and EMPLOYER
�_4.
-56-
In fact, most sprinkler leakage incidents are caused by
abuse of the system -- allowing pipes to freeze or overheat,
or breaking pipes or sprinklers -- according to a five -year
study of claims summarized in NFPA's Fire Protection Handbook.
NFPA estimates that an accidental sprinkler opening due to
equipment defect occurs in less than one sprinkler per million
per year.32 These statistics suggest that water damage incid-
dents due to home sprinklers would not add significantly to
the current rate of plumbing - related water damage episodes.
In fact, sprinkler systems receive more thorough testing -- for
leakage, water hammer, sensitivity to heat and cold, vibration
and strength of frame -- than any other part of a building's
water system. ,
Additional protection against water damage could result
from current research now being conducted to produce a sprinkler
that will shut itself off when the temperature drops below a
certain point (indicating successful extinguishment) instead
of requiring manual shut off as with current sprinkler systems.
New sensing devices have greater flexibility and should be
able to operate after sprinkler activation has occurred. Fire
Administration research on more effective water distribution
patterns also should help on this problem.
Perceptions About Need For Sprinklers Are A Problem
As with detectors, reducing sprinkler cost to a more
manageable level for the average homeowner is not sufficient
to attract those who do not perceive fire to be a real threat
to them. Results of the Rolf Jensen, Inc. /Schirmer Engineering
Corporation study, conducted in 1977, indicated "a general lack
of awareness or concern for the residential fire problem"
among the potential users of home sprinklers who were inter-
viewed. About 30 percent did not consider fire a threat to
them.33 This 30 percent group is roughly the same size as
the group of non - owners of detectors who believe fire is no
threat. Public and private efforts, like those involving
detectors, must be encouraged to address this fatalistic attitude
if residential sprinkler technology is to fulfill its potential
of saving lives and property from fire.
Residential Water Supply And Pressure Are A Problem For Some
An additional obstacle to the use of residential sprinklers
is that water supplies and pressures required for effective
operation are not practical In residences in some areas. For
example, problems exist in rural localities where water is
supplied from wells instead of distributed under pressure
through pipes. Research is needed to determine how many people
are affected by this problem and to identify alternate water
supplies (e.g., water tanks or water from solar energy systems)
or distribution technologies suitable for sprinkler operation
in these areas.
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY,
MAY 9TH9 1989.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PUBLICATION NO. 3992
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 250
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT NO. 89 -02
Hutchinson, Minnesota
May 5th, 1989
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on the 23rd day
of May, 1989, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota,
to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Graham Street from
the North Line of the Wagner Development Corporation Plat to 8th Avenue
Southwest; Wagner Street, Larson Street, and Kay Street from the North Line of
the Wagner Development Corporation Plat to Goebel Street; Goebel Street from
the East Line of the Wagner Development Corporation Plat to Kay Street; and
8th Avenue Southwest from Dale Street to the West Line of Lot 18, Block 10,
Wagner Development Corporation Plat by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer,
Water Main, Sewer and Water Services to all Buildings or Buildable Sites,
Storm Sewer, Grading, Aggregate Base, Street Lighting, and Appurtenances.
You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County
Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to
the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1989. You may, at anytime
thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or
interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you
decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of
interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay
the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1989.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
$261,620.01. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such
notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual
assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected
property owners as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following
procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify
by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits.
After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to
ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until
neither side has further questions.
j� t
Publication No.
Page 2
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call
witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same
procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with
the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they
may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of
evidence or testimony presented to the Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new
evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may,
in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it
would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special
assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that
law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any
assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution
adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment,
apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for suoh deferral of payment
of this special assessment on his property.
Gary D. PVotz, Cibt Administrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
0
0
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 9006
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 250
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of Graham Street from the North Line of the
Wagner Development Corporation Plat to 8th Avenue Southwest; Wagner Street,
Larson Street, and Kay Street from the North Line of the Wagner Development
Corporation Plat to Goebel Street; Goebel Street from the East Line of the
Wagner Development Corporation Plat to Kay Street; and 8th Avenue Southwest
from Dale Street to the West Line of Lot 18, Block 10, Wagner Development
Corporation Plat by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Water Main, Sewer and
Water Services to all Buildings or Buildable Sites, Storm Sewer, Grading,
Aggregate Base, Street Lighting, and Appurtenances.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1990, and shall bear
interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of
this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from October 1st, 1989, until the 31st day of
December, 1990. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1989; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November
15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next
succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists
of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the
same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
City Administrator Mayor
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
RESOLUTION NO. 9007
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT N0. 89 -02
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Graham Street from the North Line of the Wagner Development Corporation Plat
to 8th Avenue Southwest; Wagner Street, Larson Street, and Kay Street from the
North Line of the Wagner Development Corporation Plat to Goebel Street; Goebel
Street from the East Line of the Wagner Development Corporation Plat to Kay
Street; and 8th Avenue Southwest from Dale Street to the West Line of Lot 18,
Block 10, Wagner Development Corporation Plat by the Construction of Sanitary
Sewer, Water Main, Sewer and Water Services to all Buildings or Buildable
Sites, Storm Sewer, Grading, Aggregate Base, Street Lighting, and
Appurtenances; bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder
Amount Bid
Juul Contracting Company
Part A
$
209,942.75
Part B
$
9,906.00
N. H. Snider Construction Co.
Part A
$
248,066.40
Part B
$
11,727.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Juul
Contracting
Company of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible
bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY
THE CITY
COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract with Juul Contracting Company of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for Part A of
the improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the City
Administrator.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder
shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May 1989.
Mayor
City Administrator
11
i
0
MEMO
Date: may 19, 1989
Fran: John Korngiebel
To: Connie Mangen
Re: Main Place
pKroomglebel Architecture
�I
SuhS% �Z
46 WaMnyton Awnw Eat
Nutchlmon, Mkmesole
66960
Dear Ms. Mangen
I wish to inform you of my continued interest in the rehabilitation of the
Jorgenson Hotel and progress thus far.
I have an option on the property and have the biding documents 508 complete.
The Finance Committee of the Community Developement Corp. has held a prelimin-
ary meeting on the project and has outlined the financial information they
will require from me.
I have talked to members of the banking community and they have indicated a
willingness to cooperate on 1/3 of the financing package.
The project proposal remains basicly the same as outlined in the Cunt proposal
with 22 one bedroom and 1 three bedroom apartments being added, and the exist-
ing commm_rcail space being retained as is with only exterior retrofit.
I anticipate the completion of the financial package and bid documents in the
next two months, with construction begining in Fall.
cc; John Bernhagen
Mayor & Council m----
Gary Plotz
JWK /mh
May 17, 1989
Hutchinson City Council
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Hutchinson City Council Members:
HUTCHINSON
LIONS CLUB
HUTCHINSON, MN
W
i
The Hutchinson Lions Club has received permission from John Alrick
and the Hutchinson Jaycees to sell concessions during the 1989
Water Carnival weekend. The Lions Club is a nonprofit organization
which owns its own portable food wagon. We have in the past sold food
items such as mini- donuts, hot dogs, Polish sausage, barbeques, onion
rings, french fries, cheese curds, pop, and slush drinks. We are
seeking permission from the City of Hutchinson to set up the food wagon
on city property and have access to an electrical hookup for the food
wagon. Since the carnival will be located at West River Park, we would
like the food wagon to be near the building adjacent to the boat landing
by West River Park. The Hutchinson Lions Club has elected to operate
the food wagon on Friday and Saturday evening, 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.,
and Sunday from approximately 3:00 p.m. until after the fireworks. The
food wagon requires 110V electrical hookup.
We appreciate your assistance in this Lions fundraiser. All proceeds
from Lions projects are returned to the public in the form of donations,
financial assistance for the needy, scholarships, etc.
Please feel free to contact me should any questions arise.
I look forward to your reply and thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Keith R. Kamrath, D.C.
KRK /gmt
y
• WATER USE
The purpose of using the winter quarter as the quarter to
establish sewer rates for the remaining three quarters is that it
is normally the best estimate of the quantity of wastewater
generated by a residential user. Usually the winter quarter will
be the quarter of lowest water use.
This has not been the case at Country Club Terrace. As shown
above the lowest quarterly water use ( *) varied from 1986 through
1988. Also, the tenants at CCT are not permanent. The recent
layoff at HTI created several vacancies. HTI's shaky employment
status may also create additional vacancies.
• We do not feel that it is fair to lock in to one quarter and use
it as a basis for future sewer rates. We feel that the
theoretical sewer use rate established last year
(15,000 /home /qtr.) is a fair rate in line with normal residential
housing in Hutchinson. Again, we are not asking for free water.
We will pay for all water that passes through our meter.
We have corrected several sources of leakage since our last
appearance before the City Council. The sources have been the
connections between the water service line and the thermaline
riser. In one case the line was completely disconnected.
We will continue to closely monitor our property for sources of
water leakage and make quick, permanent repairs.
We are making an effort to hold down rents in a community where
there are many low paying ,jobs. We want to pay our fair share of
expenses and do not wish to be subsidized by the City. However,
we do not want to pass on expenses that we feel are unfair.
Thank you for you consideration this evening.
HUTCH, INC.
dba COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
William R a Block
President
COUNTRY
CLUB TERRACE MHP
5/23/89
(1,000 GAL.)
1989 1988
1987
1986
Winter
Qtr.
12/01 -02/28
4,282 4,128
2,917*
2,833
Spring
Qtr.
03/01 -05/30
5,044
3,068
2,602*
Summer
Qtr.
06/01 -03/30
7,135
3,291
2,844
Fall
Qtr.
09/01 -11/30
3,412*
3,685
2,495
The purpose of using the winter quarter as the quarter to
establish sewer rates for the remaining three quarters is that it
is normally the best estimate of the quantity of wastewater
generated by a residential user. Usually the winter quarter will
be the quarter of lowest water use.
This has not been the case at Country Club Terrace. As shown
above the lowest quarterly water use ( *) varied from 1986 through
1988. Also, the tenants at CCT are not permanent. The recent
layoff at HTI created several vacancies. HTI's shaky employment
status may also create additional vacancies.
• We do not feel that it is fair to lock in to one quarter and use
it as a basis for future sewer rates. We feel that the
theoretical sewer use rate established last year
(15,000 /home /qtr.) is a fair rate in line with normal residential
housing in Hutchinson. Again, we are not asking for free water.
We will pay for all water that passes through our meter.
We have corrected several sources of leakage since our last
appearance before the City Council. The sources have been the
connections between the water service line and the thermaline
riser. In one case the line was completely disconnected.
We will continue to closely monitor our property for sources of
water leakage and make quick, permanent repairs.
We are making an effort to hold down rents in a community where
there are many low paying ,jobs. We want to pay our fair share of
expenses and do not wish to be subsidized by the City. However,
we do not want to pass on expenses that we feel are unfair.
Thank you for you consideration this evening.
HUTCH, INC.
dba COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
William R a Block
President
RESOLUTION NO. 9002
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
16 Doz. Softballs
1492.20
Recreation Program
Rec.
Yes
Kokesh Athletic
Nalco Chemical 8448
5564.00
Wastewater Treatment
WWTP
Yes
Nalco Chemical Co.
Trees
3585.0
Tree Plantings
Forestr
Yes
Walker Tree Servic
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM I COST I PURPOSE I DEPT. BUDGET I VENDOR
Date Approved: May 23, 1989
00 tion made by:
Seconded by:
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
�I�
tit
APR 1959 w
RECEIVED
ru
4/24/89 Si .01
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council
This letter is to express my desire to operate a
food concession in the park adjacent to Peter's during the
summer months. I believe that this could enhance many of
the events taking place there and also help me when these
events consume all of the available parking around our
restaurant. I can ensure that the portable unit will be
attractive and operated in a businesslike manner.
eapectfu� �
Peter Brynildso
Peter's Restaurant & Lounge
0
ua
0
RECITALS:
1. This agreement is made and entered into this day of
May, 1989, by and between the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, ( "City ") and Peter Brynildson the owner and
operator of a restaurant located in the 101 Park Place building
known as Peter's Restaurant & Lounge ( "Peter's ").
2. Peter's has requested permission from the City to sell
food products outside the building known as 101 Park Place.
3. This agreement governs the terms under which the City will
permit the sale and consumption of food products outside of the
licensed premises currently occupied by Peter's.
THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Peter's shall be permitted to set up a vending cart or
booth on the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the north side of the
101 Park Place building. At Peter's option, Peter's may also set
up outside tables for the service of food.
2. Peter's shall not block the public sidewalk preventing the
public from using the sidewalk for the purpose for which it was
constructed and installed.
3. No alcoholic beverages may be served as a result of the
execution of this agreement.
4. Peter's shall at all times have control of the area
-1-
governed by this agreement and shall be responsible for keeping the
area in a clean and orderly condition.
5. Peter's agrees and acknowledges that it acquires no rights
under this agreement against the City, whether by prescriptive
easement, adverse possession or any other theory of law.
6. This agreement may be revoked by the City without cause
at any time. Revocation of rights under this agreement shall
become effective upon the mailing of notice by the City
Administrator of the revocation to the following address:
Peter Brynildson
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
7. The operations contemplated by this agreement are strictly
limited to those evenings during which formal events have been
scheduled and are conducted in Library Square Park.
8. This agreement shall expire on August 1, 1989.
Dated
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Peter Brynildson, d /b /a
Peter's Restaurant & Lounge
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
-2- 0
0
0
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 18th, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council ✓
FROM: City Engineer
RE: Franklin Avenue North Parking Lot
Between 1st and 2nd Avenue
Attached is the cost estimate for basic construction of the above— referenced
parking lot.
MVP /pv
attachment
!O • ias��'
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
ca
NORTH FRANKLIN STREET PARKING LOT ESTIMATE
LOT/ 768
Remove 3 trees and prune 4 trees
Backhoe to remove tree stumps and misc. concrete
Outside contractor backhoe 8 hrs. @ ;65.00 /Hr.
Front end loader 32 hrs. @ $75.00 /Hr.
3 Trucks 48 hrs. @ 535.00 /Hr.
Grader 4 hrs. @ ;70.00 /Hr.
300 Yard of Class 5 Gravel @ 52.85 /yard
Skid steer loader 8 hrs. @ $45.00
Nan hours total of 128 hours of which 96 hours are
equiment hours that include operator. This leaves
a balance of 32 hours of man hours at an average
hourly wage of ;12.00 /hour.
$ 260.00
$ 520.00
$ 2,400.00
$ 1,680.00
$ 280.00
$ 855.00
$ 360.00
$ 384.00
Total Cost-- ---- -- $ 6,739.00
Outside Contractor costs $ 520.00
Cost to City for Class 5 $ 855.00
Out of Budget Expense Total $1,375.00
0
0
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
l3"U991
DATE: May 17th, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council ✓
FROM: City Engineer
RE: Hook -up Fee
Since 1967, the City has used a hook -up fee for sanitary sewer and water in
those areas where the City has constructed said facilities as follows:
1. Regular size lines, but not following 429 procedure.
2. Trunk lines and not following 429 procedure.
3. Areas served prior to annexation by either a regular size or trunk
line.
I discussed this policy with Barry. Since the League does not have data,
Barry and I agree that the policy for Hutchinson should be whatever the City
Officials believe is a fair and equitable charge relative to costs being
paid by other property owners for the same type of installation.
MVP /pv
L J
r'
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
The hook -up fee has been
calculated by using the
frontage of the property and
one -half of the cost per
foot to install a normal
size water or sanitary sewer
line, plus interest from
time of installation to
hook -up. Such hookup fee
should not exceed the cost of such improvement at
the time of hook -up.
I discussed this policy with Barry. Since the League does not have data,
Barry and I agree that the policy for Hutchinson should be whatever the City
Officials believe is a fair and equitable charge relative to costs being
paid by other property owners for the same type of installation.
MVP /pv
L J
r'
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 18, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
RE: South Grade Road Sidewalk
T.H. 15 to Dale Street
The estimated construction cost for installing sidewalk on the north side only,
is $48,700.00. This includes the removal to new sites of 37 trees.
I recommend we consider installing sidewalk from T.H. 15 sidewalk west to
entrance to Mall at Merrill Street on the south side of South Grade Road.
This sidewalk would intersect the highway at the cross -walk where the pedestrian
button for activating the signal light is located. This would cost an
additional $11,700.00.
It is recommended that a 10 foot easement be obtained across private property
on the north side to permit the sidewalk to be installed without moving the
trees. We may need a short section of easement on the south side near the
highway. By placing the sidewalk in an area so as not to move the trees, we
can reduce the cost by $3,500.00, as well as retaining the beauty of the trees.
If the sidewalk is to be placed on the right -of -way, there is not sufficient
room for the trees.
MVP /pv
0
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
(612) 587 -5151
• WASHJWHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
INGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 23, 1989
TO: Mayor $ City Council
FROM: Water Billing Department
—
------ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: Delinquent water and sewer accounts for May
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of May. Recommend water service be discontinued
on Tuesday, May 30th, 1989 at Noon.
•
•
?—a,
r
a
REFERENCE T0: Tom Fossum (Renter)
Account No. 3- 970- 0322 -019
It is the request of Mr. Rolfe that the $15 turn -on fee be waived
in this case.
MAY 1989
sy______I
�_l #
Promises 6/05/89
Wade Serfling
Debbie Schmidt
Todd Anderson
630 Second Av SE
646 Second Av SE
197 Third Av NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
630 Second Av SE
646 Second Av SE
197 Third Av NW
3 -030- 0630 -068
3- 030 - 0646 -089
3- 040 - 0197 -099
140.95
87.40
76.25
cc: Vicky Klabunde
cc: Vicky Klabunde
cc: Dean Dietel
Rt 1 Box 218
Rt 1 Box 218
845 Second Av SE
Brownton MN 55312
Brownton MN 55312
Hutchinson MN 55350
Keith Woodford
Miles Willhite
William Lueck
605 Third Av SE
136 11th Av NE
346 Adams St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
605 Third Av SE
136 11th Av NE
346 Adams St S
3- 045 - 0605 -009
3 -130- 0136 -041
3- 210- 0346 -031
55.25
155.23
105.25
cc: Stan Koci
Promises $25 /week
525 Fourth Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 5/31/89
•
Schafer /Zander
Hutch Inc
James Reilein
570 Adams St S
369 E Kellogg Blvd
481 Clark St
Hutchinson MN 55350
St Paul MN 55101
Hutchinson MN 55350
570 Adams St S
460 California St
481 Clark St
3- 210- 0570 -006
3- 275 - 0460 -132
3- 320 - 0481 -052
23.30
3059.81
123.10
cc: Bernard Rappa
16724 Kismit
Stillwater MN 55082
Rick Giese
Papa Verns
Vince Jahner
730 Hwy 7 W
Box 565
712 Hilltop Dr
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
780 Hwy 7 W
1150 Hwy 7 West
712 Hilltop Dr
3- 505 - 0780-003
3 -505- 1150-184
3- 530 - 0712 -021
32.71
636.26
567.58
cc: Hutch Mfg Co
cc: Tom Dolder
cc: James Schlagel
720 Hwy 7 W
1204 Fairway Av
656 Juul Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55314
William Mattsfield
Brian Midtling
Dale Schlueter
James St
430 Kouwe St
336 Monroe St S
tchinson M 0
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
j463
3 t
430 Kouwe St
336 Monroe St S
0- 0463 -061
3- 500 - 0430 -085
3- 735 - 0336 -011
126.
69.53
151.66
Promises 6/05/89
James Deragon
540 Monroe St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Monroe St S
3- 735 - 0540 -031
169.51
Promises 5/30/89
Rodney Markgraf
575 Peterson Circle
Hutchinson MN 55350
575 Peterson Circle
3 -800- 0575 -012
183.79
Les Stroklund
PO Box 162
tchins0n M 55350
5 Brown
1 -27 0 0 -034
145.0
cc: Richa Larson
64 Adams St
tchinson MN 55 0
Tom Fossum
322 Water St
Hutchinson MN 55350
322 Water St
3- 970 - 0322 -019
94.54(Promises 6/02/89)
cc: Ford Rolf
844 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Total Balance $158.82
Ted Weiby
835 Oak St
Hutchinson MN
835 Oak St
3 -765- 0835 -002
126.67
Tom Carrigan
105 Pauls Rd
55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
105 Pauls Rd
3- 795 -0105 -071
130.24
D I arrigan
577 Prospect
HuNlarkk 55350
57St
3 -
10
ccn
52Hu 5350
Ron Willhite
Box 115 Route 3
Hutchinson MN 55350
227 Third Av NW
3- 040 - 0227 -032
108.01
cc: Ford Rolf
844 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Cedar Crest
225 Shady Ridge Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
225 Shady Ridge Rd
3- 870 - 0225 -002
558.05
•
Charles Rothmeier
479 Connecticut St
Hutchinson MN 55350
479 Connecticut St
3- 340 - 0479 -052
168.87
cc: Statesmen Mortgage Cc
6590 Powers Ferry Rd
Atlanta GA 30339
Total Balance $294.66
(Owner requests water to be turned off
Wed. May 24th, 1989)
(612) 587 -5151
JWHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 19, 1989
TO: Mayor & City Council — — — — —
— —
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------------
SUBJECT: —Summary And Breakdown—of Street
— --------------------
Lighting —
— — — — — —
NUMBER
COST
Sunset Ridge Addn.
6
$ 4,362.60
Park Island Drive
4
2,917.00
Plaza Heights
3
2,181.30
Hwy. 7 /Main to California (Fiberglass)
72
59,960.00
(Contract - Out) (Steel)
138,048.00
Campbell Court
2
1,454.20
*Wagner (1989 only) (4 in 1990; 4 in 1991)
4
5,989.89
Waller Drive
4
2,908.40
Bluff Street
22
16,093.00
Delaware Street
3
2,194.50
Third Avenue N.W. from Main to Glen
5
2,677.00
School Road North of Seventh Avenue N.W.
20
14,630.00
to County Road 12, and Eighth Avenue N.W.
*New Junior High School
7
5,120.50
Hwy. 7 /California to Shady Ridge
70
58,290.00 Approx.
(Contract Out)
Texas Avenue
2
1,454.00
0
TOTAL
$180 =232.39
* The items starred ($11,110.39) could be delayed until 1990. We should
have some Council action on the other items so that we do not run into the
delay (winter) problems we experienced on Hwy. 15 South.
1�
r (612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 17th, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
RE: New Hangar
Until we get all items cleared up relative to the new hangar, I recommend
we retain 5%, as per the contract. Payment would be $99,655.00 with
$5,245.00 being retained.
El
MVP/PV
cc: Ken Merrill, Finance Director
Menard's, Inc.
L J
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
Cc
RESOLUTION APPROVING
8 UNIT T— HANGAR FINANCING
RESOLUTION NO. 9009
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson desires to build an 8 Unit T— Hangar, and
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson and the State, by and through its
Commissioner, will be entering into agreements.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT, the Mayor, Paul L. Ackland, and City Administrator, Gary D. Plotz,
be and the same are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Mn /DOT
Contract No. 65467 "Hangar Financing and Repayment Agreement" on behalf of said
City of Hutchinson and to execute and affix their signatures to any and all
further required documents pertinent thereto and all amendments.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
City Administrator
Mayor 0
9 �fi.
J
MnIDOT TP-06110-03 (4/87) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AERONAUTICS DIVISION
417 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155
PHONE: (612) 296 -SM
HANGAR FINANCING AND REPAYMENT AGREEMENT
Municips6ry Hutchinson
State Project No. T.H. 76
Federal Project No. ----
Contract No. 65467
This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, hereafter referred to as State, by and through its Commissioner of
Transportation, hereafter referred to as Commissioner, and Hutchinson
hereafter referred to as Municipality. (City, County, Municipality, Airport Commission)
WHEREAS, the Municipality owns and operates an airport and desires to improve that airport by constructing and
operating 8 Unit T— hangar for storage of aircraft; and
WHEREAS, the State desires to provide hangar financing in accordance with Minnesota Statute 306.305. Subdivision 4(7):
and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 360.035, Subdivision 4(7) provides that the Municipality shall make repayment to the State as
determined by the Commissioner;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. The Municipality will prepare the site for and construct a hangar, designed and erected in accordance with plans and
specifications approved by the Commissioner. Any changes in the plans or specifications are subject to prior approval by
the Commissioner.
2. Work on the hangar construction project shall be started on or before notice to proceed
and the project shall be completed no later than June 15, 19`99
in accordance with plans and specifications as approved by the Commissioner.
3. The contract for hangar construction shall be awarded by the Municipality on the basis of the following costs:
104 , 900.00 -0- Total Project
Contract $ Engineering $ Cost $
104,900.00
4. The City of Hutchinson Municipal Engineer, Marlow V. Priebe
(Architectural Firm, Engineering Firm or Municipal Engineer) will be the municipality's designee responsible for the
engineering supervision and inspection and is authorized to sign all estimates for this project. The approved engineering
costs of plans and supervision shall be considered as approved project costs.
5. The total cost to the State from the State Hangar Construction Revolving Fund shall not exceed 80 %
of the approved project costs and in no event more than $ 83,920.00 . The proportionate shares of approved
project costs shall be: State 80 % and Municipality 20 %. No state funds are committed
under this agreement until they are properly encumbered by the Minnesota Department of Finance.
6. The municipality will make all disbursements to the contractor. The State will reimburse the Municipality for the State's
share of approved costs upon submittal of Certification of Final Acceptance by the Municipality's designee and certified
cost estimates on a form prescribed by the Commissioner and upon approval of the work by the State.
7. The Municipality will make repayment to the State of S 83,920.00 in 119 monthly installments of S 700.00
each, and an 120th installment of S 620.00 , with the first installment to be due and payable on the
first day of the month following receipt of hangar financing monies from the State.
8. The Municipality shall not sell or transfer title to the hangars which are the subject of this Agreement for a period of 20
years from the date of the Certificate of Final Acceptance.
9. The Municipality presently has available sufficient unencumbered funds to pay its share of the project; and It shall be
responsible in the execution of this Agreement that all provisions of its municipal charter and applicable state and
federal laws have been strictly followed.
10. The Municipality shall maintain such records and provide such information on request of the State so as to permit the
Department of Transportation, the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor to examine those books, records, and account -
ing procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to this contract pursuant to Minn. Stat. 168.06 Subd. 4.
11. The Municipality shall save and hold harmless the State from any claims, liabilities, or damages including but not limited
to costs and attorneys' fees arising out of the project which is the subject of this Agreement.
12. The Municipality agrees that it shall not utilize any state or federal financial assistance received pursuant to this Agrw
ment to compensate either directly or indirectly any contractor, corporation, partnership, or business however organized,
which is disqualified or debarred from entering into or receiving a Minnesota Department of Transportation contract. This
restriction applies regardless of whether the disqualified or debarred party acts in the capacity of a general contractor, a
subcontractor, or as an equipment or material supplier.
13. The Murticlpafity agrees that all contracts for materials, supplies, or work performed under this agreement shall comply
with the equal employment opportunity requirements of Minn. SM. § 161.59.
1. MUNICIPALITY
By:
Paul L. Ackland
Title: Mayor
By:
Gary D. Plotz
Title: City Administrator
3. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Assistant Commissioner, Aeronautics
Date:
Distribution: Original — Finance
Copy 1 — Municipality
Copy 2 — Aeronautics
2. Approved as to Form A Execution
Special Assistant Attorney General
4. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
Authorized Signature
Date: i
5. COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE
Authorized Sgnalure
Date:
0
(612) 587 -5151
CITY Of H UTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 16th, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
RE: Letting No. 4
I have reviewed the bids received on May 15th on the above - referenced project,
with Barry Anderson. We agree that it may be in the City's best interest to
reject all bids again and rebid. This is based on the following:
1. Mid Minnesota Hot Mix bi(i. of $81,759.56, corrected amount.
Bid Bond was only 5 %, instead of 10% required.
0 2. Bauerly Bros., Inc. bid 184,970.06, but submitted same at 1:50 P.M.,
twenty minutes late. Thts should not be considered.
3. Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc. bid of $88,133.00 was submitted properly
in all respects.
I recommend we call for new bids on Monday, June 5th, 1989, with bid opening
at 2:00 P.M.
MVP /pv
0
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
9J_)
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTING NO. 4 r
PROJECT 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12
DATE May 15th, 1989
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
Duininck Bros., Inc.
No. Co. Rd. 1
P.O. Box 208
Prinsburg, MN 56281
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
831 Park Ave.
Hamburg, MN 55339
10% Bond
$88,133.00
Bauerly Bros., Inc.
4787 Hwy. 23 N.E.
Sauk Rapids, MN 56379
107 Bond
84,970.06
(Received
1:50 P.M.)
Burress Construction Co., Inc.
Route 3, Box 153
Mora, MN 5505±
Mid Minnesota Hot Mix
Hwy. 55
Annandale, MN 55302
59 Bond
?7,799.56
g �d.
0
•
RESOLUTION REJECTING BIDS AND ORDERING READVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
iLETTING NO. 4
PROJECT NO. 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -079 89 -12
Resolution No. 9005
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 25th day of April,
1989, ordered the Advertisement for Bids for the improvement of Texas Avenue
from California Street to 4051 East of California Street by Construction of
Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Connecticut Street
from Shady Ridge Road to the South Line of Hilltop Addition and on Westwood
Road from Connecticut Street to the West Terminus by Construction of Curb and
Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Carolina Avenue from 180' East
of School Road to Arizona Street and Arizona Street from Carolina Avenue to
School Road by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and
Appurtenances; and Keith Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue,
Sunset Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue and Chicago Avenue from
Sunset Street to Keith Street by Construction of Bituminous Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, said bids were received, opened and tabulated on May 15th,
1989,
AND WHEREAS, in tabulating said bids, discrepancies and ommissions were
found;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The City Council hereby determines to reject all bids.
2. The City Engineer shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official newspaper, and advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under approved specifications. The advertisement shall be
published for 10 days; shall specify the work to be done; shall state that
bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on June 5th, 1989, in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota, by the City Administrator
and Engineer; will then be tabulated; and will be considered by the Council at
the regularly scheduled Council Meeting at 7:30 P.M. on June 13th, 1989, in
the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
City Administrator
Mayor
9- d'
V (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 15, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
RE: Temporary Bridge
Attached is the proposal by Structural Specialties for Construction of the
temporary bridge. I understand a portion of this cost is to be paid by
McKimm Transit, Inc.
We expect to get approval from DNR to make the installation by June 1st.
MVP /pv
attachment
0
W"/� y
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
q ' 25
STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES INC.
P.O. BOX 502
N
MUTCNINSON, MN 55350
1612)567.6716
MARCH 30, 1988
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES, INC. WILL FURNISH MATERIAL, LABOR
AND EQUIPMENT TO BUILD A BY PASS BRIDGE FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
TO USE WHILE BRIDGE # 4913 IS BEING REBUILT ON HIGHWAY 22 SOUTHEAST
OF HUTCHINSON. UPON COMPLETION OF THE NEW BRIDGE STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES,
INC. WILL REMOVE THE BY PASS BRIDGE. THE MATERIAL FROM THE BRIDGE
WILL THEN BECOME THE PROPERTY OF STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES, INC.
THE BRIDGE WILL BE 15' WIDE AND 40' LONG. THE LOAD LIMIT
ON THE BRIDGE WILL BE 30 TON, THIS SHOULD ACCOMADATE THE MAJORITY OF
THE HAULING BY THE CITY. THE BRIDGE WILL BE BUILT 200' TO 300' SOUTH
OF THE BRIDGE TO BE REBUILT. THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON WILL BUILD THE
ROAD TO THE BRIDGE ON BOTH ENDS.
accepted by
date
STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES, INC. WILL DO THE JOB FOR $ 15,000.00.
STRU TURAL SPECIALTIE ,INC.
date
- /4 -�'y
LJ
0
%F
E
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
GARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. HARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN 5. HOGE
LAURA E. PRETLAND
DAVID A. HRUEGOEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
RICHARD G. WOKE
May 4, 1989
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
.
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
5881 GEDAH LARK ROAD
Or 0017 391.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-1492
rV P/J WILLIAM W. CAMERON
PAUL D. DOVE
(612) 545 -8000
I`
-., 1.'
MN TOLL FREE 600 - 343 -4545
`
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
GABLE MGLAw MINNEAPOLIS \.
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(012) 389 -2214
TELECOPIER (612) 545 -1793
TELECOPIER(612) 308 -5506
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Benton Property -- N eh `
i
Our File No.: 3188 -88 -0092
Dear Gary:
101 PARR PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587 -7575
TEL£COPIER(612) 587 -4096
1,��q 1516173
N o
cc
� nh4Yt929
REUIVED
Lp
L.
I have your memorandum of May 1, 1989 regarding the acceptance of
parkland donation for Lot 10, Block 21, South 1/2 of the City of
Hutchinson. I am enclosing for your information a copy of the
Title Opinion which I prepared on January 4, 1989. In connection
with that Title Opinion, I pointed out that there are several
judgments of record against Donald R. Kramer which have not been
satisfied of record. If the City accepts the donation of the
property in question, the property will at least arguably be
subject to these very small judgments. The total amount due and
owing on the judgments still of record, even with accumulated
interest, is something less than $1,000. The City does not become
liable for the judgment amount; rather, the judgment holders may
have some interest in the real estate in terms of ability to retain
an attorney, have a sheriff's sale and otherwise attempt to collect
the amounts that are due and owing. As a practical matter,
subsequent judgment holders and ultimately the City might have to
pay the judgment holder for the purpose of preserving their
interest.
I did write Mr. Benton in late January and at that time I asked him
for a copy of the Contract for Deed between him and Mr. Kramer.
He did not respond to my letter.
However, upon receipt of your memorandum, I discussed this matter
with him at some length. He was not aware of the judgments and it
appears in fact that he drafted the Deed without the aid of an
attorney.
q- F
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
May 4, 1989
Page 2
It would be my recommendation that the City accept the Deed to the
property. If any of the judgment holders do take any action with
respect to an attempt to preserve their rights, the City can
address at that time whether or not it wishes to continue to hold
onto the property or reach some kind of an agreement with the
judgment holder. It is extremely unlikely that the City will hear
from these individuals, but I suppose anything is possible.
On the assumption that the City does wish to go ahead and accept
the donation of the Lot 10 in Block 21 in the townsite of
Hutchinson, I have prepared a Quit Claim Deed and sent it to Mr.
and Mrs. Benton for their signature along with a self- addressed,
stamped envelope. When the Deed is returned, we will make
arrangements for recording and notify the tax office that the
property is now tax exempt although there will be non - homestead
taxes due and payable in 1989 amounting to approximately one half
of the base amount (which is $176).
I suggest that this matter be placed on the agenda for the purpose
- °� of accepting the parkland donation.
If you have any questions or problems in connection with the
foregoing, you certainly should feel free to contact me.
Thank you.
Very ruly
ARI D & N
G. Ba A
GBA /lls
11
0
0
DAVID IL vMOLD
OM4BLRR L CARMICRAZL
DART D. MaDOORLL
STRVZN A. ANDRRSOM
0. DAUNT ANURRSON
STRVRR S. BOOR
CIfARLRS L. NAZI. JR.
LAURA R. FRRTLAND
DAVID A. DRUROORMANII
JOSRFH M. FAIRMZNT
JAMRR UTLRT
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
RICHARD 0. HoOSR
January 4, 1989
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ArrouNsys AT Lsw
seal C=D&n L&xz RorD r
MIMMRwroLIR. MI71xmou 5 5416 -140 8
(a Is) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FRHR soo -040-4545
C�DLH MCLAW MINNLFOLIS
TRLRCOFIRR (015)4 -1900
Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Purchase of Property legally
described as Lot Ten (10) in
Block Twenty -One (21) in the
Townsite of Hutchinson, South
Half
Subject: Title Opinion
Our File No.: 3188 -88 -0092
Dear Mr. Plotz:
m 0000551.
WILLI" W. CAVINA M
501 SOUTH FOURTH STBRRT
FRIIICRTON. MINNSSOT4 soon
(610) oe0 -5014
101 PARK FLACK
BUTCHINSON. MIN'RSOTA "a"
(610) 587-vela
At your request, 2 have examined the Abstract of Title to the above -
described property. The Abstract as presented for examination con-
sisted of 65 entries numbered from 1 to 65 inclusive and was continued
to the 28th day of December, 1988 at 8:00 -a.m. by Lynn Ette Schrupp,
Deputy McLeod County Recorder. According to my examination of the
Abstract, fee simple title to the property was owned by Richard P.
Benton. Said ownership was subject to the following:
3.
4.
x�3
Subject to the rights of any person or persons in possession of
the premises above described.
Subject to the rights of any person or persons to claim a lien on
the premises herein for work performed or materials furnished in
the improvement of said premises within the 120 days preceding the
date of certification of the Abstract.
Subject to all encroachments, easements and other matters that
might be ascertained by an actual survey and inspection of the
premises above described.
Subject to existing zoning and building regulations and ordinances.
F
1.
t
2.
3.
4.
x�3
Subject to the rights of any person or persons in possession of
the premises above described.
Subject to the rights of any person or persons to claim a lien on
the premises herein for work performed or materials furnished in
the improvement of said premises within the 120 days preceding the
date of certification of the Abstract.
Subject to all encroachments, easements and other matters that
might be ascertained by an actual survey and inspection of the
premises above described.
Subject to existing zoning and building regulations and ordinances.
F
v 1 .
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
January 4, 1989
Page 2
r
0
S. Subject to unpaid installments of special assessments now levied
but not yet due and payable, if any.
6. Subject to chattel fixture liens, if any, arising under BCC,
Chapter 336 of Minnesota Statutes.
7. Subject to taxes as follows: Taxes for 1988 and prior years have
been paid in full. Taxes for 1989 are not yet known but the base
tax amount of 1988 was $176. The taxes are assessed in the name
Of Richard P. and Suzette Benton and the property has been given
a parcel identification number of 23- 050 -1740, all according to
certificates attached to the Abstract dated December 29, 1988.
8. Appearing at entry number 65 of this Abstract is a quit claim
deed dated June 17, 1985 and filed for record in the office of
the McLeod County Recorder on June 17, 1985. This quit claim
.deed runs from Donald R. Kramer to Richard P. Benton and Suzette
Benton, the fee owner and spouse of the fee owner of the subject
property and appears in Book 198 of Deeds at Page 562 in the
Office of the McLeod County Recorder. Donald R. Kramer is a
stranger to title as his name does not appear anywhere else in
the record. Our office requested a judgment search which
revealed several small judgments against a Donald Kramer prior t
the date of the Deed, specifically, $55 on February 2, 1979, $133
on June 24, 1980 and $381.36 on March 15, 1983. There was a 1985
judgment after the date of the stray deed which can be ignored.
Mr. Kramer's interest in the property is not clear; prior to
accepting the deed to the property, inquiry should be made
regarding Mr. Kramer's interest in the property and the reason
for the 1985 quit claim deed. Please understand that if the City
accepts title to this property, the City does not become per-
sonally responsible for these small judgments. Rather, the City
will stand behind those specific judgment creditors in any sale
of the property. The judgment. creditors would also be entitled
to interest from the date of their judgment. We will write to
the fee owner of the property and inquire as to Mr. Kramer's
involvement with the property.
9. According to the certificate attached to the Abstract dated
December 28, 1988, there are no blanket federal or state tax
liens on file against the above - described fee owner of the pro-
perty nor against Donald R. Kramer, the judgment debtor referred
to in the proceeding paragraph. There are no mortgages of record
against the above - described property.
Thistitle
connection
Thank you.
opinion is for your use only. If you have any questions in
with the foregoing, do not hesitate to contact me.
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
7 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, A41NN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Wilma Ross of 533 Huron
Pursuant to Section 6.07, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation
with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On April 25, 1989, Wilma Ross, 533 Huron, submitted an application for a
conditional use permit to allow her to move a 20'4" x 20'4" garage on property
located at 533 Huron. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission on Tuesday, May 16, 1989, at which time there was no one
present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 1989.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
0
9- G
� I _
0
13 ;,
e:
!a
L
i
0
0
9 -(;-,
RESOLUTION NO. 9003
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO MOVE A GARAGE ONTO
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 533 HURON ST.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Wilma Ross, 533 Huron, has made application to the City Council for a
Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.03 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow
them to move a 20'4" x 20'4" garage on property located at 533 Huron St. with
the following legal description:
Legal description: Lot 14 in Block 64 in the Townsite of Hutchinson
South Half
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and
the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is
granted.
Approved by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. P otz
City Administrator
(612) 587 -5151
37 V✓A.S,I-IINGTON AVENUE WES T
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson Citv Council
FR91: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R -3 TO C -4 PROPERTY
IN CASA ADDITION ALONG TEXAS AVE. AND CALIFORNIA ST. BY JERRY
BIRD HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPLY
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning.
HISTORY
On April 25, 1989, Jerry Bird, Hillyard Floor Care Supply, requested to rezone
property located on Texas Ave. and California St. in Casa Addition from R -3
(Multiple family residence) to C -4 (Fringe Commercial District). A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday,
May 16, 1989, at which time there was no one present who objected to the
request, however, two short notes of objection were read from Mr. Gary Miller
and Mr. John Miller, neighboring property owners.
FIVOINGS OF FACT
1. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 1989.
2. It was the consensus of the of the Planning Commission that the request
was appropriate for the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request to rezone be granted based on the findings set forth above subject to
th,e understanding that at the time of the building permit the loading docks on
California St. be closed.
Respectfully submitted,
Willia- -raig, Cnai --ian
Hutchinson ?lac i ^„ Ca7missi --n
- 9- N.
0515- to
r
m
6
I
• 2
4 �
III4 •
1�
,p iexae Avenue
Area to be rezo
w R -3 to C -4
W
,s
i
�I
�i
Fi
Q �
tJ2(�j L-IM(,)P/ "I n Z
�o.JiH ��+0 0�" 1%e ��js ^r(,__ b ✓•10- ,Vc�_� �<i,,y. =_ �
Imo_ .. _
East
°- . -•'k i J 0 7 -. .-
TEXAS
AVENUE
JJ1. y/ 4
1
I
1w
I Ilp
IM
I-
C�
O = I
I
; lr
0 6\
L
7M
"E p c 1
m
"
_ _N89'12'5y
Q
f
r •
{ 104.00
0 to I%D
e y, 4D 'in
rJ
c]
I.J
2 I-
O 1 I
l.J
tj
W
I
n-
I
..
0 n
v
-�
17
z It L
•- 125.00•-
,
'
�)
J.
N 9.12'58"
I:
O
Q
, •
0
C
LO
_ n
W
•
r
. ♦
.
0
O
.
0
I
-125.00•
-
I'Sw cor. of
N89.12'5E
NW I/4 of SE 1/4 .45.1
II
AVENUE
JJ1. y/ 4
1
I
1w
I Ilp
IM
I-
C�
BLOCK I 10
to 10
p 10 1�
50 10 1—
IN I
I
O I I
O 1 110
.01 I ,
' 208.00• 1 South one of NW
E, I 2` .. 1 -of Sec 36. r II;
1 \
)0.. f �\ \J
- `\ v-
O = I
I
; lr
7M
"E p c 1
OD
"
_ _N89'12'5y
f
r •
{ 104.00
M1
•.�
I
n-
BLOCK I 10
to 10
p 10 1�
50 10 1—
IN I
I
O I I
O 1 110
.01 I ,
' 208.00• 1 South one of NW
E, I 2` .. 1 -of Sec 36. r II;
1 \
)0.. f �\ \J
- `\ v-
(612) 587 -5151
37 WASHING TON A VENUE WES T
_ HUTCHINS0N. MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Plannino Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN CASA ADDITION
Pursuant to Section 5.972 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submittting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for vacation of
utility easement in Casa Addition.
HISTORY
On April 25, 1989, Mr. Jerry Bird, Hillyard Floor Care Supply, submitted
an petition for the vacation of the Southerly 6' utility easement of the
Easterly 119.0 feet of the Westerly 125.0 fee;tz. of Lot 1 Block 1 in Casa
Addition. The public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of May 16, 1989, at which time there was no one present who objected
to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published
in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 1989 and Tuesday, May 9, 1989.
2. The vacation is necessary to construct an addition onto the present
building.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the vacation of the
aforemetioned utility easement be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, C` airman
Hutchinson Planni-,i Commission
9-rI
s 9
CASA ADDITION
I
Io
East
- •332.97 -•
TEXAS AVENUE
r�
°
332.97 0
—
110
I.J
l_ J
O
CD
\`
�N
p M
IM
I
.,
lco
,.
�...
uj
I
L!J
.
2 —
I
In
O I
I
I-
V
,
+ EASEMENT TO BE
` VACATED- If
o =
I
tv t tj
u
P W
- --
N 89 °12. 58 E 0 a
-- -- - - - - --
I
a)
I
�Y
East
- •332.97 -•
TEXAS AVENUE
r�
°
332.97 0
—
110
O
CD
\`
�N
p M
IM
I
.,
lco
CV) l0
�...
I
lip
.
2 —
I
In
O I
I
I-
V
Y' :
+ EASEMENT TO BE
` VACATED- If
o =
I
tv t tj
u
P W
- --
N 89 °12. 58 E 0 a
-- -- - - - - --
I
a)
O
h.�.� ..�.- �._.►.�.+'
�-Z N89 °12'S8'E
--- - - - --� - --
t'0
= 0 --
-�
K,
�'
� •--125.00••- "'�
-
f
- -- --- -
104.00 L-. - - -- °
,•
M L
N89012'58" E
104.00
I
0
0
I
BLOCK 1
I
:O
--'
q
_
p
0
l0
O
�
O
10
00
10
la
o ,
W
Vl N
IN
I
I
O
00
1
0
110
JNWI/4
125.00 '.
1
- 2 08. 00
South ime of NV
of Sec 3G, T li
Sw cor. of N89° 12'58'E'
\
of SE 1/4 .45.00.1
I
�\
t. N
co
0
TO
FROtI
SUBJECT
(612) 587.5151
i C;T7 0a NUTC ^-r PJSO,11J
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
Hutchinson City Council
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Variance Request as Submitted by Clark Miller,
P 0 11 C41- U. .- i r
Q- Petrol on the
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
HISTORY
On April 27, 1989, Mr. Clark Miller, Q- Petrol, submitted an application for a
variance to allow him to reduce the frontyard setback from 15' to 5' of green
area at property located on Hwy 7 East the former A & W Restaurant site. A
public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
Tuesday, May 16, 1989, at which time there was no one present who objected to
the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 1989.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be
granted based on the findings set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Pianni,ng Commission
9- J-1
;
r
C
:+
N
Kev :aecl Si-Fc van
; 4-em sd
Nesset ARCHITECTURE 0
197 Third Street Excelsior, Mn 55331
612- 474 -1240
r SL'
� w „vs tunas
CA
rbRTH
� 4 I le l0 I Z2i ?A�k 3
D
IT'E RAO
I
HI&HWA'*r IF
0
9 -T
RESOLUTION NO. 9004
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO
REDUCE THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 15' TO 5' FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
CONVENIENCE STORE /GAS STATION /CARWASH ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT HWY 7 EAST
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Clark
Miller, Q- Petrol, has applied for a variance from Section
10.03 of the Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce side yard setback
from 15' to 5' for
construction of a convenience store /gas station /carwash
located on Hwy 7 East
the former A & W site with the following legal
description:
That part of Lot 10 of Auditor's Plat of Lot 14 of Auditor's
Plat of West Half of Section 32, Township 117 North, Range
29 West, described as follows:
Beginning at a point 209 feet South and 542 feet West of the
northwest corner of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 32, Township 117, Range 29; thence South 250
feet; thence East 125 feet; thence North 250 feet; thence
West 125 feet to the point of beginning.
Also the East 20.00 feet of the North 175.00 feet of Lot 1,
Block 2, SANTELMAN'S ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof.
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a variance and
has recommended to the City Council that the application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the
values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed
variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to
the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply
generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is
located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demon-
strable hardship or difficulty.
9- T
CONCLUSION 0
The application for variance for the purpose designated is granted based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 1989.
Paul Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
LI
0
(612) 587 -5151
,� CITY OF HU7CHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO- Hutchinson City Council
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM• Hutchinson Planning Commission
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: — CONSIDERATION OF—LOT—IN LOT 1 BLOCK 1 CASA ADDTTLO D — — —
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Lot split to
City Council subject to an 8' utility easement. be provided on
East side of a line 125' East of and parallel with the hest
line of Lot 1, Block 1 Casa Addition as requested by Hutch Utilities.
9 -X
CASA ADDITION
i
£o , ime of ROLLING OAKS SECOND ADDITION
South
1
j:.
v:
Z o
0.00
..
- 166.38--
o
50.00
N
- -- ---- '- a v
30.00
10
I
m
I
Ii
w
CD
z
IVI
lD
CAD
__- l0
lO
p N
tr O
co
1
I
'I
m
,6
N to
. tb
I
,
/�✓
X
o° r*i_4!30.00
- 150.00-
5.00
�:
D
_
210.00
-I
�6 61
I
1
I
I
I
IZ
IW
Iw
O I
I
�1D
— I N
It0
OI
01
IN
I
J
I
D
c I
I
I
1
/
I
N
O
I
m
;
m
0
m
rI
Z
I
-i 0.00
m
I North
Z
_I
Im
01
to
��
D!
12
O6 61(P
1 113?
I
In
.10
0
145.00
0
0
_ J
136.82 0
30.00 1,,
- 311.82-
oIm
°
North
I
A
-
_?
_
to oo�
W I
N p
N
y
J
9
•
f
t
�t
If
I
1
�E
9� E
17�
(612) 587 -5151
H�rcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
' 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson City—Council
FROM: _Hutchinson Planning —Commission _ _ _ _
SUBJECT: —CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH—PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROY LUND (2 mile Radius)
The Planning Commission recommends approval with no objection.
�21314J15�16�j�:9
cc h" 1Y 1989
RECEIVED N
��6-'O£62tzC
R.R.3, Stahl's Lake
Hutchinson, MN 55350
May 5, 1989
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Roy Lund Sketch Plan
Dear Mr. Plotz:
This is to inform you that Roy Lund made an appearance before the
Board of Supervisors of Acoma Township at our regular monthly meeting
on Tiuesday, May 2, 1989, seeking approval of the sketch plan of Roy
Lund. After some duscussion, a motion was made, seconded and unanimously
carried to approve the sketch plan subdividing the lot.
If you have any furthur questions regarding this matter, please feel
free to contact David R. Popp, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors.
Your truly,
p C � Q) -,�u�
Dorothy Bullert
Appointed Clerk
Acoma Township
•
q--. 4,
ACOMA
TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE -I RANGE 30 WEST
MEEKER co
LYNN
s
�± I
IRAGE 51
3
i
O
4
9/�I
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
.c rcl
•....
c., .c
e
>
i
��+
.
u- ._r.."'•
:
u
�(�
__
<
ate::.
Air
(
.._
n::••.._
i
_
6�trw
(
.^•u.y 4.1
er�s_r
4
9/�I
s
IT .
PC /
AlG 'e70
°7y
4P' 37' F D INAGE BOUND Y-- - — -
=Y
I °
6iu
b y�
\' o COMM R—CIAC i \ccr�rJEti'clgL �°
i H
SE2UIC
e„Le�F C �rsere- cMp ca
s.v COI? , SK 15< 111714, R 3a W
C3(CeK Z'--" "JCimOn'j .1dd; Tian {fu7`C.%inse.< I77n. �'wn e.r•: /boy .C"nd 7e /e L!
a - 97y- Val-"
(612) 587.5151
jffjH AT Y O F HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CNINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
—
-------------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF BURGER KING SITE
------------------------ - - - - --
The Planning Commission recommends rezoning back to R -2 the parcel
which was rezoned to accomodate the the Burger King site plan.
Planning Commission also recommended that the City Attorney proceed
with procedures to remove the vacant yellow house at 35 4th Ave. NW.
0
9 -M,
C (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
T0: —Hutchinson City—Council
— ----------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: — —Planning Planning Commission
— --------------- — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: —CONSIDERATION—OF FREEDLAND FENCE PROPOSAL
— -------------------- — — — — — — —
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed fence
contingent upon the fence being constructed of factory pre- finished
material with a treated wood frame, also, a sketch being provided
at the time the building permit is issued.
0
9'Al
t
STATE
DEPARTMENT
P.O. BOX 457, SPICER,
PHONE NO.
(612)796 -6272
March 3, 1989
Jim Marka
Building Official
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Jim:
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MN 56288
FREEDLAND CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
FILE NO.
I am writing concerning Jay Freedland's, Hutchinson Iron and Metal
Inc., proposal to place a fenced storage yard within the 100 year
flood plain. The Department has 3 major concerns regarding this
proposal.
1. The facility is required to be located entirely in the
flood fringe district and completely outside of the
floodway.
2. Materials stored on site do not represent hazard to human
safety and the river ecosystem as a result of inundation
by flood waters on the site (PCA approval should be
obtained).
3. Fences constructed to screen the site should be
constructed of materials that have a low flood damage
potential and to allow passage of flood waters.
Please contact me if you have any questions concerning the above.
Sincerely,
DIVISION OF WATERS
Skip Wright
Area Hydrologist
bjf
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
0
0
0
9 =i✓
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
February 15, 1989
Mr. Jay Freedland
Hutch Iron 8 Metal
304 -1st Avenue S.E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Jay:
FOR YOUR 11vruRh1ATi4i1
Confirming our phone conversation this morning, I have placed your request to
construct a staggered steel type fence on the property formerly owned by Ms.
Emily Verosta on the March 1989 Planning Commission Agenda.
Because you have prior committment and cannot attend the February Planning
Commission Meeting, I would gladly forward any drawings or models you have
available to both the Planning Commission and City Council. Please note, that
formal consideration and action cannot take place until the March 21st and
28th meetings. Please plan on attending both of these meetings to present
your proposal.
Be regards, m
Jam s G. M1i ��
Building Official
JGM /pv
cc: ✓ 6yor and City Council
Planning Commission
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
0
(612) 587.5151
� CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 17, 1989
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE CODIFICATION BY MR. BILL WEBER, WEBER URBAN PLANNING
—Ai7D— - IGtt — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The Planning Commission approved Mr. Weber's proposal to revise
the city's zoning ordinance contingent on Mr. Weber providing
a certificate of insurance to the City Administrator and release
the city from any legal complications from BRW as our original
contract was with BRW.
L J
WEBER URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN
3824 Huntington Avenue St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416
(612) 920 -1749
May 8, 1989
Mr. James Marka, Building Official
Members of the Hutchinson City Planning Commission
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Mr. Marka and Members of the City Plannning Commission:
As you requested, I have revised my work program and cost esti-
mate for updating the Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance. I have
deleted a portion of Task 4.0 addressing the Flood Plain Ordi-
nance and have also deleted four review meetings with the
Planning Commission. These changes have reduced my not -to- exceed
cost by $1,000 to $4,980 as indicated by the attached budget. I
am confident that I can still produce a document with which you
will be quite pleased.
In anticipation of being given the go -ahead for this work, I have
been working with your secretary Bonnie Baumetz to resolve a
technical problem involving your word processing technology and
mine. I think we have this straightened out and I can proceed as
soon as we can sign a formal contract.
Thank you for your interest in my services.
SSi�ince�rreely, !
William C. Weber, AICP
Urban Planner
0
q_�
HUTCHINSON ZONING ORDINANCE REVISION
PROJECT BUDGET
MAY 8, 1989
PERSON -HOURS
TASK
Professional
Clerical
COST
1.0 Review with staff
4
0
$160
2.0 Residential districts
2.1 Draft Revisions
10
2.2 Review with Staff
4
2.3 Submit Revised Draft
2
4
$720
3.0 Com. and Ind. Districts
3.1 Draft Revisions
8
3.2 Review with Staff
2
3.3 Submit Revised Draft
2
4
$560
4.0 PD.; General and Special Provisions
4.1 Draft Revisions
8
4.2 Review with Staff
2
4.3 Submit Revised Draft
2
4
$560
5.0 Administration, etc.
5.1 Draft Revisions
16
5.2 Review with Staff
4
5.3 Submit Revised Draft
4
3
$1,020
6.0 Compile full draft
4
2
$200
3
7.0 Review with City Attorney
2
0
$80
8.0 Revise, submit to PC
2
3
$140
9.0 Review full draft with PC
6
6
$360
10.0 Revise and resubmit
2
4
$160
11.0 Attend public hearing
6
0
$240
12.0 Revise draft, prepare index
5
4
$280
Totals
95
37
Hourly Rate
$40.00
$20.00
$4,480
Photocopying
$150
Mileage and meals
$350
Not -to- Exceed Cost
$4,980
Note: This cost estimate includes
2 meetings with
the City Planning
Commission and /or City Council.
Additional
meetings would result
in additional charges at the
hourly rate stated
above.
Photocopy
charges include a sufficient
number of copies
for City
staff,
Planning Commission, and City
Council but not
for general
distribution to the public.
Clerical charge
rate equals
my
direct (outside) cost.
q,�
(612) 587 -5151
HarcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, M1NN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
Date
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: James Marka, Building Official
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
SUBJECT: MAY 16, 1989, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING UPDATE
Planning Commission Agenda Items:
3(a) - Approved as proposed - little discussion
May 18, 1989
3(b), 3(c), 4(a) - Proposal from Floor Care Supply is to construct a
conforming loading berth off of Texas Ave. Please note that both John and Gary
Miller (adjacent property owners) are opposed to the rezoning from R -3 to C -4,
but the owners of both 4- plex's included in the rezoning expressed NO
dissatisfaction (Mr. Dean Bemis and D &K Central). Hutchinson Utilities requested
an 8'0" Utility Easement on the Westerly side of the proposed Easterly property
line. The planning commission approved the rezoning contingent that Floor
Care's California St. docks be permanently closed. The Engineering Dept. is
aware of Texas St. loading design change and will accomodate.
3(d) - Approved drainage to be approved by engineering, stacking and
parking to be verified by staff, buffer trash and vaccum, completely curbed
site, NO propane sales, shield lighting if necessary. 25' sideyard setbacks
required not 22'0 ".
4(b) - Approved - little discussion
5(a) - I have received a Registered Land Survey, and a request for a
Building Permit Application to construct a "convenience store" only. NO Burger
King Site plan has been received. Planning Commission recommends rezoning back
to R -2 the parcel which was rezoned to accomodate the Burger King site plan.
Planning Commission also recommends the City Attorney proceed with procedure to
remove the vacant yellow house at 35 Hwy 7 W.
5(b) - Mr. Freedland's fence was approved contingent that it be factory
painted, a earthtone color and rust resistant.
E
Page 2
5(c) - Referred back to Staff. The Hansen's are to provide me with a list
of questions and concerns by June 1, 1989, so staff can respond. I felt the
following questions needed to be addressed:
1) Actual tax difference on 2.56 acres (Ron Hansen porperty) is
approximately ;178.00 /year.
2) Do the fuel barrels have to be removed /relocated?
3) All zoning non - confroming Land -use issues.
4) Deferred assessments - when do they become active and the status
of them.
5(d) - The Planning Commission approved Mr. Weber's proposal to revise
Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance contingent that Mr. Weber provide a Certificate of
Insurance to the City Administrator and release the city from any legal
complications from BRW as our original contract was with BRW. I discussed this
with Mr. Weber who informed me that he has NO liability insurance on himself but
exposure is minimal and if he works thru BRW the cost is approximately $30.00
per hour more or approximately double. I need some direction on this matter if
we are to proceed.
cc: Marlow Priebe
Barry Anderson
Gary Plotz
Bill Weber, BRW
Bill Craig, Planning Commission Chairman
JM /bb 9
0
(612) 587.5151
HarcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 19, 1989
TO: Mayor & City Council
----------------- ------- - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Reference Check On Tom Parker - Proposed Contract for Fixed
-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Base Operator At Hutchinson Airport
iI
have checked the four references
provided
by Tom Parker. Three of
the
references
termed him an excellent
mechanic,
dependable, trustworthy,
self -
motivated,
and honest. The fourth
reference
was a bank reference in
Anoka
since 1973.
Both his checking and
business
account have been termed
"OK:"
The Police Department is checking the state computer information system,
and they will provide me with information by Tuesday night.
/ms
cc: Airport Commission
11
q- P
John Miller
227 South Main Street
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
612 -587 -6500
April 28, 1989
Mr. Thomas Parker
408 106th Ave. NW
Coon Rapids, MN
Dear Tom:
n 4
We have received your proposal and it will
be discussed at a special meeting we are
having on Monday, May 1, 1989.
I will be in contact with you, but the terms
of your proposal look very reasonable to me.
Thank you for your response.
Sincerely,
John Miller
JM:cs
1]
0
0
40
0 x��o
5.
7.
Q8.
I' OK 3.
{iJ1iHI.'3 J:d .l ?.?. °.)T P "•� :pt'•.iAL ��r�A�D ._ ".HJ: i;9 ?.��:�':i
Servi,es I expect to provid at Hutc'rina :n Kuni Apt.as Hu'.ocinson
tlilht service,'
:�YOrs :e a .-•uil y3rvi.e ??O no -::ale ?usso r.ours, glee 1.'ar
rental nirara:t s'rialA'le as .r,rrart..: •3 3a..
'13 Sin .roc _)nsl "ina:cial ra;,ords.
rtiJJ7Er :i °.; Ia L.. .. ;') in; etrlta-ie9 to i.i.i )AIs aiz.77rt
....dn so_, PiIA sna tLiraract ssp ?lies _ ?? i :aai, `saah to a-o.in-� gill
And zvps.
lhinv I noed to zaintain FFS for the first year and
aasure f i^.sncial stability.
du'.e.,dizad ree. for the big hanger 1.:J;d by Lee city. Cil-
iboo
5u }:s' ciaod west .'sr t?w Dig hanger 4% by the airy srd » by sS, 40
'.)r six :�otuAh3 :.f the year, !Jot. thro %qh %ar. mop _C�.�
J
3.ui : :.n ;; & heating systom to De .aaintsined by fue city, alsa:.i> g
to ear Sena
':;IM !:a ;3v9 the use of oi'.°i4o and lo+m.;e bldg. oleani 3g :o be d:na 14
H?S and to It d.)as by the city.
Preride space for xehils hyxs end noox uo far sn:Js, P-3 to
?rur:!e capa.r._ie entrance to els.trie room f.r the city eaplsylvo,
Fiev:+e -b VS with a gis her to Bell or use tue1 as needed.
Cont act to have FiJ day termination olouss to pro act both
parties in event of a breesh of contract.
oaa._ year- isa s*_"- theatwsgetista...-- -_. - -. _.- - --
11. Lxaluvive right to all airport services exept where HFS is
not able to provide thi needed services.
12. Sutsidiasd sales and aarketipg program.
ALb 'PH133 " Z . AR$ 3tf3igC: 2q 4saai2a2FCH[. Y3AW TxTULY xoMy
Thomas Ptrsey'��i
0
AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
THIS AGREEMENT made this _ day of April, 1989, by and
between the City of Hutchinson ( "City ") and Marlow V. Priebe, doing
Y
business as Priebe Engineering
g g , is for the
purpose of outlining the rights and responsibilities of the various
parties to this agreement. The Engineer will serve as the City's
professional engineering representative and the City will pay the
Engineer and provide such other benefits, and only such other
benefits, as are set out in this agreement.
The Engineer and City agree as follows:
1. The Engineer will perform professional design and
supervision services in connection with various municipal projects,
including but not limited to normal civil, structural, mechanical
and electrical engineering services in connection with various
municipal projects. It is the intention of the parties that the
services performed by the Engineer will be similar to and include
the services typically performed by a staff director of
engineering for Hutchinson.
2. The Engineer shall attend all Council, Planning and other
meetings regularly attended by the staff director of engineering.
The Engineer will provide assistance and reports as needed or
directed by the City Administrator, the City Council or the
Planning Commission of the City of Hutchinson. The Engineer shall
provide assistance to all other City departments and to residents
and others in all phases of the Engineer's duties and
responsibilities
The Engineer shall be required to provide the
services described in this agreement between the hours of 8:00 A.M.
and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, except when the Engineer's
attendance is required at meetings held outside of regular business
hours. In the event the Engineer's services are required at a
meeting outside of regular business hours and outside of the
meetings the Engineer is otherwise required to attend, the City
shall compensate the Engineer at the rate of $ 7 7, J D per hour
for time actually spent in attendance at the meeting.
3. Conflicts of Interest. It is understood that the Engineer
has, in the past, provided services to properties within the city
limits of Hutchinson and to property which may someday become part
of the City of Hutchinson. It is understood and agreed that the
avoidance of a conflict of interest is a critical and material
element of this agreement. The Engineer shall provide,
contemporaneous with the execution of this agreement, a list of the
developers and a list of the.projects now underway in the City of
Hutchinson for whom the Engineer has worked in the past. It is
understood and agreed that the Engineer shall not calculate
assessment rolls for any parcel so listed or any parcel in which
the Engineer has or had an interest. As to these parcels, the
Engineer shall provide only those services requested by the City.
A breach of this covenant shall entitle the City to immediately
and without any further notice terminate the agreement between the
City and Engineer. This right is without prejudice to any other
-2-
is
rights the City may have, in law or equity, as a result of the
presence of a conflict of interest on the part of the Engineer or
the failure on the part of the Engineer to disclose the conflict.
4. Compensation. The City shall pay to the Engineer the sum
of $1100 per week. Compensation shall be paid on a bi- monthly
(every other week) basis.
5. Independent Contractor. It is understood and agreed that
the relationship between the Engineer and the City shall be that
of independent contractor. The City has retained the Engineer for
the provision of professional services and has not hired the
Engineer as an employee. The City shall not be responsible for any
other expenses or benefits typically accorded employees, including
but without limitation to medical benefits, retirement benefits,
and unemployment or severance payments.
6. Liability Coverage. The City shall provide liability
coverage on an errors and omissions basis for the Engineer as if
the Engineer were a staff director of engineering for the City of
Hutchinson. In the event coverage is not available to the City,
the Engineer shall secure such coverage and provide a binder
demonstrating the existence of errors and omissions coverage. In
that event, and only in that event, the City shall reimburse the
Engineer for the expense of errors and omissions coverage and only
for the period of time the Engineer actually performs services for
the City. The City may, at its option, either advance payment for
-3-
errors and omissions coverage or reimburse the Engineer within
thirty (30) days of the termination of Engineer's services to the
City.
7. Length of Agreement and Termination. This agreement shall
be effective for a minimum of sixteen (16) weeks. The Engineer
shall provide services under the agreement commencing within ten
(10) days after the mailing of notice to the Engineer of intent to
commence services under the agreement. The mailing shall be made
by the City Administrator to the Engineer at Rural Route #2, Box
846, LaHacienda Estates, Alamo, Texas 78516. This agreement shall
terminate on November 1, 1989. At any time after the passage of
sixteen (16) weeks following commencement of the agreement, either
party may terminate the agreement upon one (1) week's written
notice to the other party. The City may terminate the agreement
between the parties during the initial sixteen (16) week period for
reasonable cause. Reasonable cause is defined to include but not
be limited to nonperformance or misperformance by the Engineer of
his duties or a failure on the part of the Engineer to perform the
duties or the equivalent of the duties performed by a staff
director of engineering.
8. City Services. The City shall provide office space in
City Hall for the Engineer, as well as secretarial support together
with all the usual customary and necessary equipment and supplies
for the performance of engineering duties. It is understood that
the secretarial support and usual and necessary equipment and
_W
supplies is generally considered to be the secretarial support and
supplies provided to the staff director of engineering. The City
shall also supply a vehicle or vehicles to the Engineer for use
during office hours.
9. Arbitration. All claims, disputes and other matters in
question arising out of, or relating to, this agreement or the
breach thereof, shall be decided by arbitration in accordance with
the construction industry arbitration rules of the American
Arbitration Association then existing. This agreement to so
arbitrate shall be specifically enforceable under prevailing
arbitration law. The award rendered by the arbitrators, as
provided by Minnesota law shall be final and judgment may be
entered upon it in any court having jurisdiction.
10. Document Ownership. All documents, including original
drawings, estimates, specifications, field notes and data are and
remain the property of the City. The Engineer may at his expense
obtain a set of prints of drawings and copies of the
documents.
11. Post Termination. In consideration of the covenants
agreed to, Engineer agrees that following termination, Engineer
will cooperate with the City and representatives of the City in
answering any questions, or providing any documentation relative
to services performed by the Engineer or regarding knowledge of
events or circumstances occurring while the Engineer was an
employee of the City or, as under this agreement, where the
-5-
.gineer was an independent contractor.
12. This agreement shall not be assignable by either party.
is agreement shall not take effect until it has been approved by
the City Council of the City of Hutchinson.
Dated:
m:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By:
Marlow Priebe, d /b /a
Priebe Engineering Ewa- xyF'A-
E
0
•
•
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WATER $ SEWER FUND
*WITHHOLD Tax Account
employer contribution
*PERA
employer contribution
* Withhold Tax Account
employer contribution
Diane Olsen
logis training
Dyna Systems
terminal assortment
NuTech Environmental Corp.
chemicals
Sargent Welch Scientific
gasket B seal kit
Big Bear
supplies
Crow Chemical
weed killer
Curtin Scientific
hand wipes
Dixie Petro Chemical
chemicals
Feed Rite Controls
acid
Hutchinson Coop
gasoline
League of Mn. Cities
registration fees
Logis
computer charges
Mn. Valley Testing Lab.
testing
PERA
employer contribution
City of Hutchinson Dental Ins.
May dental ins.
Mutual Benefit Ins. Co.
May LTD ins.
Donohue & Associates
professional services
Quades Electric
repairs
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*Withhold Tax Acct.
employer
contribution
*PERA
employer
contribution
*Withhold Tax Acct.
employer
contribution
PERA
employer
contribution
City of Hutch Dental Ins.
May dental ins.
Mutual Benefit Ins. Co.
May LTD ins.
MAY 23, 1989
$611.39
328.41
582.54
21.32
102.00
105.50
97.31
17.99
98.60
28.31
67.00
971.85
346.77
75.00
1012.14
135.05
344.75
272.58
108.15
8380.48
199.40
$ 13,906.54
$ 88.23
47.97
84.77
49.93
31.28
11.60
$ 313.78
/ /'c.t
-2-
GENERAL FUND
• * Withhold Tax Account
employer contribution
$3628.19
*Dept. of Natural Resources
DNR registration fees
822.00
*PERA
employer contribution
3996.30
*Blue Earth Co. His. Soc.
tourfees
16.50
*Mankato YWCA
Mankato tour
41.25
*Withhold Tax Account
employer contribution
3713.14
*Commissioner of REvenue
arena sales taxes
432.60
*Dept. of Natural Resources
DNR registration fees
672.00
Mrs. Peter Holm
gymnastics refund
13.00
Maureen Ziemer
Peanuts refund
4.00
Mark Johnson
tennis instructor
90.00
Michael Hogan
League fee overpayment
12.00
Marguerite Bentz
Logis training
9.10
Brian Brown
State Fire School
45.00
Joe Drahos
State Fire School
670.40
Jamie Emans
State Fire School
95.23
Gary Forcier
State Fire School
45.00
Kelly Goranson
State Fire School
68.78
Chuck Lingbeck
State Fire School
45.00
Craig Powell
State Fire School
75.75
Ronald Robinson
State Fire School
45.00
Mike Schmidt
STate Fire School
75.34
James Popp
National Fire Academy
105.00
American Planning Assn.
Planners registry
25.00
Assiniboine Park Zoo
46 tickets
94.05
Clarke Outdoor
part
229.96
• Christensen Repair
chain sharpening
1.00
Dept. of Labor $ Industry
5 pressure vessel.certificates
50.00
Hutch Mfg. $ Sales
repairs
249.50
McLeod Co. Fire Chiefs Assn.
dues
100.00
Mn. Conway Fire & Safety
bunker coat
179.00
MN. IAAI
dues
10.00
M.S. Lord Selkirk
46 tickets
1078.00
Manitou Theatre Mgmt
46 tickets
210.68
Memindex
2 wall planning guides
24.90
Mini Biff
rental
120.00
River Rouge Tours
46 tickets
377.20
Nelson Farms
mystery tour fee
360.00
Traf 0 Teria Systems
2000 envelopes
139.93
Up & Away Balloons
ballonns for Prom
70.00
Victorian Inn
Sr. Prom. banquet
914.10
Am. Risk Services
June counsel services
800.00
Arnold $ McDowell
compensation
2500.00
Big Bear
supplies
112.44
Brinkmans Inc.
film
13.28
Bennett Office
toner
23.20
Chapin Pub. Co.
bid advertising
131.60
Copy Equipment Co.
supplies
18.50
Co. Treasurer
dl fees
111.00
Chas Bailly 8 Co.
audit fees
2450.00
Culligan Water Cond.
repairs
342.00
• Eileen Goeders
contract payment
1500.00
Hager Jewelry
UPS chgs.
14.03
Hutchinson Coop
gasoline
2966.52
Henrys Candy Co.
supplies
376.39
-3-
Hutch Utilities
lamps $ ignators
Hutch Public Schools
bldg. supervisor
Joes Sport Shop
2 plaques
League of Mn. Cities
registration fees
Logis
computer charges
Marco Bus. Products
binders
Mn. Sports Federation
balls
MSF
sanction fees
Mid Central Inc.
gloves
Motorola Inc.
repayment of refund
Mr. Movies
film rental
Northern State Supply
supplies
Peterson Bus Service
coach $ van rental
R F, R Specialties Inc.
parts
St. Paul Book $ Stationery
supplies
PERA
employer contribution
PERA
back deductions- D.Johnson
Templeton Funds Trust
employer contribution
Uniforms Unlimited
police clothing
UBC
supplies
U.S. West Com.
leased phone line
Xerox Corporation
ribbons
West Pub. Co.
law book
City of Hutch Dental Ins.
May dental ins.
Mutual Benefit Ins. Co.
May LTD ins.
Victorian Inn
Sr. Prom banquet
• Donald Johaneson
bldg. official conf.
Virgene Joecks
shelter refund
James Marka
bldg. official conf.
Robert Rossell
morning paper
Victorian Inn
guest skater room
Cash wise sr.center activities
County Market supplies
Great Plains supplies
HCVN 410 cable franchise
Gary Plotz city adm. conf.
Pikal Music Store supplies
Marco Bus. Products typewriter £, printer
BOND FUNDS
Bonds of 1984
First Trust adm. fees
Library Bond Debt Service
First Trust adm. fees
E
$647.65
13.13
7.00
1050.00
4190.04
64.56
3355.34
340.00
129.85
995.00
2.10
37.50
495.00
16.10
406.58
4024.20
552.01
164.08
1638.25
200.42
326.50
33.50
42.00
1892.43
782.29
914.10
15.24
10.00
16.24
12.00
103.78
14.99
83.32
414.45
8306.05
82.78
50.00
953.25
$ 62,694.59
$701.25
$701.25
0
•
I*
-4-
LIQUOR STORE FUND
Quality nine &Spirits Co.
Johnson Brothers Wholesale
Griggs Cooper £, Co.
Ed Phillips F, Sons
WIthhold Tax Account
City of Hutchinson
PERA
PERA
City of Hutchinson
Withhold Tax Account
Commissioner of Revenue
Quality Wine 8 Spirits
JOhnson Brothers Wholesale
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Ed Phillips F, Sons
wine & liquor
$2272.26
wine & liquor
4616.63
wine f, liquor
2277.00
wine $ liquor
2284.33
employer contribution
294.43
payroll
4017.01
employer contribution
165.64
empl oyer contribution
166.60
payroll
4110.08
employer contribution
297.15
April sales taxes
7722.87
wine & liquor
4517.84
wine G liquor
2633.88
wine $ liquor
1565.01
wine $ liquor
4535.55
$ 41,476.28
•
40
DO. COMER (1914 -1967)
RONALD J. MCGBAW
STEVEN L. WARD
JOHN M WARD
May 23, 2989
City of Hutchinson
c/o Arnold & McDowell
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attention: G. Barry Anderson
Dear Mr. Anderson:
McGRAW & WARD, P.A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
P.O. BOX 98
CITIZENS BANK BUILDING
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
TELEPHONE
612 -587-3900
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Re: Bob Hornick - Burger Ring site
The purpose of this letter is to serve as a follow -up to our telephone
conversation earlier today concerning the above-captioned matter.
Based upon the most recent Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and
newspaper articles that followed, there seems to be some confusion regarding the
above - captioned matter. We hope that via this letter much, if not all, of the
confusion will be eliminated.
First, there seems to be a great deal of concern about Mr. Hornick's
submitting a site plan for the proposed Burger Ring. My understanding is that a
site plan was submitted sometime back when the Hutchinson City Council approved
the rezoning of the subject property to commercial status. Mr. Hornick has
assured me that the site plan that was previously submitted is still operative.
Perhaps some of the confusion that has resulted here stems from the fact that the
franchisee who originally wanted to build on this site now has stepped out of the
picture and the Burger Ring corporate headquarters has taken over the intended
construction of the Burger Ring restaurant. As I explained to you during our
telephone conversation, the Burger Ring corporate headquarters are located in
Florida and, consequently, sometimes the lines of communications are not as open
as would be the case if we had a local franchisee. In addition, dealing with a
corporate office does create additional bureaucratic and administrative problems
that would not be present if we were dealing with an individual franchisee. I am
sure that the city fathers can appreciate the difficulties associated with going
through proper bureaucratic channels to obtain approval for various matters.
Notwithstanding the above, it is my opinion that the dispute regarding the site
plan is moot in light of the fact that Mr. Hornick has indicated that the previous
site plan is still operative.
City of Hutchinson
May 23, 1989
Page Two
Second, Mr. Hornick has assured me that the architects for the project are
nearing the completion of their work and he expects that they will finalize their
work within the next two weeks. Mr. Hornick has indicated to me that he expects
to be applying for a building permit sometime within the month of June.
Therefore, it is my opinion that the project is moving along adequately and will
be available for review by the appropriate city officials within the next month.
Based upon that, Mr. Hornick has asked that the city table any discussions
concerning a "rezoning" of the subject property until July 1989, assuming
Mr. Hornick does not meet the above timetable.
Third, Mr. Hornick recognizes the city's concern for the removal of the
yellow house next to his convenience store. Mr. Hornick has asked me to request
from the city an extension of time to remove this building so that it would be
available for storage use during the construction phase of the Burger Ring
restaurant. Mr. Hornick has authorized me to inform you that the removal of the
building would occur before "the snow flies" this winter.
Finally, we recognize the fact that certain members of the community have
opposed this rezoning from the outset, but we continue to maintain that the city
followed the correct path from the outset in zoning the subject property to a
commercial status. All reasonable evidence clearly indicates that the area is
commercial property and the comprehensive plan indicates the same. We applaude •
the legislative action taken by the City of Hutchinson in recognizing the
commercial nature of this area and their subsequent rezoning to commercial status.
We acknowledge the delays in the process of applying for the building permit, but
believe that the project is now in a position to move forward within the next
thirty days. We appreciate your consideration of the proposals we have made above
and look forward to a determination by the council to table discussion of this
matter until July 1989.
We look forward to hearing from the city attorney and /or the city
administrator concerning our suggestion.
very truly yours,
Steven L. Ward
SLW:ab
cc: Bob Hornick
/ (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
M E M 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE: May 19, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Engineer
RE: South Main Street
4th Avenue to 5th Avenue
I have inspected the sod placed last year and it definitely has been winter
killed from the salt, etc..., from the street. We propose to have the
contractor replace same at an estimated cost of $400.00. I understand we
will be still be under contract cost.
Is
MVP /pv
`J
W ® V. e.4
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
'0 HUTCHI SON
W_URTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
/! _HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
iii Chief: Orlin "Butch" Henke
��J�/ FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Re: Your 4 -24 -89 request for my input regarding your proposal
to charge the Rural account for time involved in preparing
fire reports from outside the city limits.
First of all, I would request that the Mayor, Council and you
reconsider whether this is an appropriate charge to the rural
community. Yes, this is a cost directly attributable to fires
outside the city limits for which taxes are not paid to the City of
Hutchinson. However, I feel there must at times be a sharing of costs
or trading of economic benefits in situations such as these. The
rural community does contribute substantially to the economy of the
City of Hutchinson. It may not take the form of direct property taxes
but most certainly it does in retail sales.
Should you decide to implement this proceedure, I believe the
only fair method would be on an actual time basis. Since the Fire
Marshall's position is a twelve month, full -time position, I viould
suggest that the hourly rate be determined by dividing the annual
salary contract by 2.60 days and then by 8 hours per day. The cost
for PERA and FICA would be in addition to the salary cost; however,
I don't feel an additional cost for insurance benefits would be
worthwhile in the calculation. The billing periods could be quarterly,
semi - annually or annually depending on the dollar amounts involved.
I have already presented the 1989 budget to the Town Boards. In
my presentation I detail the costs to the City of Hutchinson... an item
that is reviawPd clnsely. SinrP T havP not inrludPd ? bUdgPtPd emnitnt
for fire report preparation, wou a i mp emen e
►A11D�, until 1.90. This would further give e t ime o
IV ocument the actual time spent on rural fire reports and give me an
estimate of what to budget for 1990. It may also give some relativity
to the appropriateness of this cost.
Respectfully submitted,
Gary L. Henke,, Treasurer
cc: Orlin Henke, Chief
0
0
F(512) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 12, 1989
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marlow V. Priebe, City Engineer
RE: Letting No. 7, 1988
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Before the final surface is placed on the streets for the above- referenced
letting, the catch basin on Grove Street on the South side of 2nd Avenue
S.W. requires a new outlet line to the northeast on 2nd Avenue. Attached is
the layout sketch and estimated cost by Juul Contracting Company, who is the
sub- contractor for Duininck Bros., Inc.
W"& O' &
Marlow V. Priebe
City Engineer
MVP /PV
attachment
cc: Cal Rice
Larry Rarg
JUUL CONTRACTING CO.
LISTING CHART. '`l. ,44
� • � ✓G -
76ef
� •�
/LSe.00
C',.L- 1n4 CS S
3r.
G se'=
So.Oo
C..err,r�0.<l HN ✓�
BFI
e d90�
S9o.0o
//
ass
auso
A'4 E ric.
LS
d."
30.00
CL
St
Si=
2L. if
s0
35s
G 2i�
7700
21aciW. A
�aao, zs
i_ -
League of Minnesota Cities
May 2, 1989 /
183 University Ave. East
St. Paul, 1,55101.2526 FOR YOUR INFORMATION
(61 5600 (FAX: 221.0986)
VVu rRECEIVED 0 1989
_..__..... dSl
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
City Hall: 37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Gary:
In 1983 the Minnesota Court of Appeals was created with the goal of
reducing the significant case load facing the Minnesota Supreme
Court. The creation of the Court of Appeals had an immediate and
direct effect on cities by dramatically increasing the number of
. reported judicial decisions affecting them. What were previously
unreported decisions of three -judge district court panels became
reported pronouncements from the State Court of Appeals.
In reaction to the increased volume of appellate decisions
affecting cities, the League considered and eventually created the
Municipal Amicus Program (MAP). MAP's creation enabled the League
to develop a systematic method of influencing the development of
judge made law in Minnesota. Prior to the creation of MAP the
League only had the resources to file amicus curiae briefs in about
two or three cases a year. Since the creation of MAP in March of
1986 the League has filed briefs in 24 appellate court cases. Of
the cases with final dispositions the Courts have decided 16 in
keeping with some or all of the arguments made in the League's
briefs (See enclosed summary of cases.). Of particular
significance is the fact that we have been a factor in getting the
Supreme Court to overturn eight unfavorable Court of Appeals
decisions. The Supreme Court has quoted us on several occasions.
We believe MAP is meeting its objective of influencing the
development of judge made law affecting Minnesota cities.
As most of you are aware, MAP is funded by separate dues from
cities voluntarily becoming members. Currently, 155 of the 854
cities in Minnesota pay dues to support the efforts of MAP
Of the state's 75 largest cities, 40 are members.
We encourage your city to seriously consider supporting MAP. Its
achievements attest to its value, and we believe it is worthy of
your city's support. We believe larger cities are particularly
benefitted due to the level of their municipal activity and the
consequent increased potential of litigation.
If you would like to discuss the program or have someone from the
League further describe its benefits to you or the city council,
�4 lease contact me, Stan Peskar or Tom Grundhoefer at the League
ffices.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Si rely,
Vii'' "
Donald A. Slater
Executive Director
0
MUNICIPAL AMICUS PROGRAM
REVIEW
(6/1/86 to 5/1/89)
Since June of 1986 the Municipal Amicus Program (M.A.P.) has
filed 24 amicus briefs. The program has allowed the League to
have greater impact on the increasing volume of appellate court
cases affecting Minnesota municipalities. On a number of
occasions the Supreme Court specifically cited from the League's
brief as a basis for deciding in the cities' favor.
Of the cases in which the League has filed a brief, we have
received 16 favorable decisions, 3 unfavorable decisions and 2 no
decisions. There are currently 3 cases waiting final
disposition. Of particular significance is the fact that we have
been a factor in getting the Supreme Court to overturn 8
unfavorable Court of Appeals decisions. No favorable decision of
the Court of Appeals has yet been reversed by the Supreme Court.
The program has filed briefs or memoranda in the following cases:
1. Lund v. Hennepin County: a case challenging the
constitutionality of the state's property tax system.
Disposition: Case was decided in the County's favor by the
Minnesota Supreme Court. The United Stated Supreme Court
dismissed an appeal.
2. Anderson v. City of Hopkins: a case challenging the right of
a city and its employees to immediately appeal to the Court of
Appeals, from a trial court's wrongful denial of a summary
judgment motion on the issue of qualified immunity.
Disposition: Case was decided in City's favor establishing an
immediate right to appeal. The case allows cities to potentially
avoid burdensome litigation in otherwise frivolous lawsuits.
3. Wesala v. City of Virginia: a case challenging the Court of
Appeals decision holding that a city waives its various statutory
immunities by belonging to the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Disposition: After accepting the case for review, the Minnesota
Supreme Court reversed itself and decided not to hear the appeal.
4. Swanson v. City of Bloomington: a case involving the scope of
judicial review of municipal zoning decisions.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Minnesota
Court of Appeals and held that the scope of judicial review of a
municipal land -use decisions is limited to a review of the record
before the council, if there is a verbatim transcript of that
record and if the public hearing was fair and adequate.
5. City of Eden Prairie v. Leipke: a case involving the extent to
which a city may be estopped from enforcing its zoning ordinance
because of alleged actions of the city's zoning and building
officials.
Disposition: Court of Appeals ruled against the City and
returned the matter to the trial court for further testimony.
6. Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids: a case reviewing the issue of
the whether a city council's decision to undertake a storm sewer
improvement after it has knowledge of the storm- sewer's
inadequate capacity, is a discretionary decision immune from
liability.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Minnesota
Court of Appeals and held that such decisions are discretionary,
and there is no duty to correct the inadequacy.
7. Anderson v. City of Willmar et al: a case addressing the
issue of whether a police civil service commission may lawfully
use independent examiners to conduct examinations and make
recommendations concerning prospective job applicants.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Minnesota
Court of Appeals and found that use of independent examiners was
not an unlawful delegation of authority.
8. Shortridge v. City of Maplewood et al: a special assessment
matter raising the issue of whether a property owner may
challenge a special assessment 4 years after it has been imposed,
on the ground that the notice of hearing contained a defect. The
Court of Appeals held that the property owner could bring the
challenge.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the decision
of the Court of Appeals and held that the property owner could
not challenge the assessment 4 years after it had been adopted.
9. Independent School District #254 v. City of Kenyon: a special
assessment case challenging the City's method of apportioning
assessments for storm trunk sewer projects.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals found against the City.
10. Bahr v. City of Litchfield: a case challenging a civil
service promotion decision. Plaintiffs claimed defects in the
process, but waited approximately 18 months before bringing their
lawsuit.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of
Appeals and found that posting of written notice of the promotion
decision was sufficient to commence the running of the 60 day
period in which to challenge the decision. The Court of Appeals
had required personal service of the notice.
11. city of Minneapolis v. Krawsk : a case challenging the
const tut onal ty of the State's Obstructing Legal Process
statute (M.S. 609.50). The trial court and the Court of Appeals
ruled the statute unconstitutional vague on the basis of City of
Houston v. Hill.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of
Appeals and upheld the State's Obstructing Legal Process
statute.
12. Minnesota Teamsters v. Washington County: a case addressing
the issue of whether health insurance for retirees is a mandatory
subject of bargaining under the Minnesota Public Employees Labor
Relations Act (MPELRA).
Disposition: The Court of Appeals found in favor of the County.
Review was accepted by the Minnesota Supreme Court. The matter
was eventually dismissed when the 1988 Legislature passed a law
on the question.
13. State v. Holmquist: a case involving the doctrine of
discretionary immunity and whether the doctrine applies in
instances of alleged failure to place a no shoulder sign on our
road.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals found against the State. The
Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals and held
that the State was not liable. However, it did not decide the
discretionary immunity issue but ruled for the State on the basis
of causation.
14. Crystal Green v. City of Crystal: a cas
challenge to a road dedication requirement.
brought after the plat had been approved and
to secure plat approval the developer agreed
requirement 'under protest.' The City argued
was brought too late.
e involving a
The challenge was
recorded. In order
to the dedication
that the challenge
Disposition: The Court of Appeals held that the challenge to the
dedication requirement had to have been made prior to plat
approval and recording. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied
further review. The decision assures the finality of the
platting process.
15. Parranto Brothers, Inc. v. City of New Brighton, et al,: a
case addressing the issue of whether a downzoning of property
results in a taking of property. The city down -zoned an area of
property from B -3 to B -1. The downzoning precluded plaintiff's
desired use of the property but permitted other commercial uses.
Plaintiff alleges that the rezoning does not substantially
advance legitimate state interests or afford the owner
economically viable use of its land.
Disposition: The Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in favor of
the city, finding that the downzoning was supported by sound
planning rationale and that the regulation did not deny the
landowner all economically viable use of its property. The
Minnesota Supreme Court turned down the landowner's petition for
further review. Consequently, the Court of Appeals decision
stands as good law.
P 16. Snyder v. City of Minneapolis: A case raising the issue of
the constitutionality of the Municipal Tort Liability Limits.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals applied the limits but did not
specifically rule on their constitutionality. The Supreme Court
has granted further review. The League filed an amicus brief in
support of the tort liability limits.
17. Annandale Advocate v. City of Annandale, et al,: a case
addressing the applicability of the open meeting law and the data
practices act to proceedings involving the termination of a
police chief. The Court of Appeals generally affirmed its
previous decision in in Itasca County Board of Commissioners v.
Olson, 372 N.W.2d 804 (Minn. App. 1985), that private data on
high level employees changes when it is reasonably necessary to
discuss it at an open meeting. In effect, declaring that the
Open Meeting Law overrides the Data Practices Act.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of
Appeals and found that a council must close that portion of a
meeting during which it discussed private data under the data
practices act. The Supreme Court adopted reasoning from the
League's brief.
18. Lienhard v. State of Minnesota,: a case involving a challenge
to the State tort liability limits. The Court of Appeals upheld
the limits against a constitutional challenge.
Disposition: The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the
constitutionality of the state tort liability limits. Thus
implicitly recognizing the validity of the municipal limits.
19. Gorecki v. Ramsey County: a case addressing the issue of
whether a comparable worth job reclassification triggers the need
for a veteran's preference hearing. The employee argued that the
reclassification constituted a demotion.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals held that there was no need
for a veteran's preference hearing. The Supreme Court affirmed
the decisions of the Court of Appeals.
P 20. Countryside Village v. City of North Branch: a case raising
the question of whether the special assessment appeal rights
contained in Minn. Stat. chap 429, apply to an ad valorem tax
levied in a storm sewer improvement district. The trial court
held that such rights exist and that failure to notify the
landowner of the rights invalidates the tax.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals made clear that a tax in a
storm sewer district is not a special assessment. Therefore
there is no requirement to show special benefit. The case is
currently before the Minnesota Supreme Court on the issue of the
proper notice procedures that must be used in establishing a
storm sewer improvement district.
21. Frank's Livestock and Poultry v. City of Wells: a case
alleging negligent firefighting.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals held that the City owed no
duty to take extraordinary measures to put out the fire.
P 22. Dahlheimer v. City of Dayton: a case alleging negligent
firefighting.
Disposition: The case is pending before the Court of Appeals.
23. Lovrien v. City of Shorewood: a case alleging that city
shoreland zoning regulation work an unconstitutional taking of
plaintiffs' property.
Disposition: The Court of Appeals held that the shoreland zoning
regulations furthered a legitimate governmental objective and did
not work an unconstitutional taking of property despite the fact
that the plaintiffs' property could only be used for lake access,
boat docking and other recreational purposes.
24. Anders et al. v. Washington County: a case raising the issue
of whether the County could change the amount it contributed as
its portion of employee health insurance premiums. The employees
alleged that changing the employer contribution with regard to
existing employees resulted in breach of an implied employment
contract.
Disposition: The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed the trial
court which had ruled that a 1988 legislative amendment barred
plaintiffs' action. The Court said that there was no indication
of legislative intent to apply the statute retroactively. The
Court did not specifically rule on the validity of plaintiffs'
underlying cause of action.
P = Pending matter.
0
W II11111 IIIII llI IIIIIIIIIiW� (I�f�l l "��Iliil
- - - - - -- -- - CITY OF MTCXI.YSON - - - -.
-. LIQUOR STORE_ COMPARISON— - -_ - -.. _
APRs. 19RA
FOR YOUR
null ® ',... ...c 11.4 1VO 1, 01. 'M Sf a KNOB
k
APRIL
_ -.
LIQWR
.
_- NINE .. -.
_ BEER - -_..
_.RISC. ti
TOLL. _
6Y - - - - --
A
A�iR.,L _ .
L, quaL
0
(a.7. A,L
C3r<�t.
n1rSQ.
1 0%RL
by
1988
!l
_. -JAI _ _
_ o _
_ -k4•_.
!'
L "1_
I � ! 1
l� el
`98.975{
1
F
�_
4
L-
-WEEK
—
}
��71.
!
6
_fir
j
_ I.E e
I
_ �"
jsv�
f
..11(...
177
E
14
16
c
,3
i5l O.
..
J —` —�—
11�
�.
X71
Nb
.. _.,kEal,_
79</
3ASI
1_:.i.'ZZI.
__�_jk36.
1991 -
,
I
r
1..
'e
-
---
_
! x
2
_
p23.
ai.
6
2ks7
�1c1!
�I
_!_.
_
7
?
—07
�'e
L
1....
I
j
I
I
-
_911
_
..
70
444___4
-1
S
zj
_.a
,
-
n1e
w
slly
s
s
H
z
z
t
.t
-
U
{
tL
_
1
(
—
__
1
1._..
M
rl,
' � j
I
AMRG
MYSA
null ® ',... ...c 11.4 1VO 1, 01. 'M Sf a KNOB
k
April 1989
top Payment Charge
Balance
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
Treasurer's Report Carol Conradi, Treasurer
BUDGET INCOME BUDGET INCOME
MTD YTD BUDGET
$ 89,270.16 $125,383.26
-10.00 -10'00 FOR YOUR INFORMATIO
$ 89,260.16 $125,373.26
Receipts:
Basic State /Federal Aid
58,853.00
256,000.00
Big Stone County
5,522.25
11,044.50
22,089.00
*Chippewa County
18,461.25
36,922.50
*73,845.00
Kandiyohi County
26,534.50
53,069.00
106,138.00
McLeod County
35,145.00
35,145.00
70,290.00
Meeker County
16,305.50
32,611.00
65,222.00
Swift County
8,640.00
17,280.00
34,560.00
Appleton
2,337.50
4,675.00
9,305.00
Benson
4,652.25
9,304.50
18,609.00
Glencoe
6,428.00
12,856.00
25,712.00
Graceville
968.75
1,937.50
3,875.00
Hutchinson
14,035.25
28,070.50
56,141.00
Kerkhoven
997.00
1,994.00
3,988.00
Litchfield
9,993.75
19,987.50
39,975.00
Ortonville
3,197.00
6,394.00
12,788.00
Willmar
21,710.00
43,420.00
86,840.00
Bird Island
1,772.25
3,544.50
7,089.00
*Dawson
Hector
2,455.50
4,911.00
1,617.25
• 9,822.00
6,469.00
*Madison
2,857.25
5,714.50
*11,429.00
Renville
1,928.50
3,857.00
7,714.00
Cash Receipts c Sales Tax
4,303.12
15,944.03
49,500.00
Gifts
74.95
1,962.95
2,000.00
Interest
1,066.78
2,487.99
81000.00
Reimbursements (local govt)
*Chippewa County
8,007.00
16,014.00
*32,028.00
*Dawson
1,368.00
2,736.00
* 5,472.00
*Madison
875.00
1,750.00
* 3,500.00
Benson (materials only)
1,500.00
2,048.00
Chippewa Co.(materials
only) 6,000.00
16,000.00
14,234.00
Montevideo (materials only)
10,000.00
Other Reimbursements
742.95
2,612.85
5,931.00
Other
Total Receipts
206,379.30
454,216.07
1,0`54;613.00
Other Funds
Glencoe Fund
1,532.38
KCWL
1,786.00
Family Ties Fund
4,000.00
4,000.00
6,300.00
Large Print Fund
AL RECEIPTS
$299,639.46
2,615.00
$586,204.33
2,615.00
& BALANCE:
$1,072,846.38
Page 1 (OVER)
April 1989 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM Treasurer's Report (Continued)
EXPENDITURES:
EXPENDITURES
E✓<PENOZTURES,
TO EST
AM-
-ACCT
GA3UP..•
.00
LIBRARY -
PERSONAL SERVICES
SALARIES ANU WAGES
-
35.356.3S
- -- 222.37342. --
-- _-32.86%
1636.120.00
HEALTH INSURANCE
1.330.29
5.413.47
2S.7e%
219CCC.00
Mc ALTH INSURANCE - JSOUCTIPLE
312.98
1,326.29
44.21%
3,OCC.00
RETIREMENT INiUAAt,CE
5,253.03
1l♦1C4.92 --
-35.444-
---- E3,24J.00
ACCT
SROUP...
62,132.65
250,219.70
32.88%
761,060.00.
MATERIALS
- - 1089£ - ADULT _ _ _.. _. _.
_ _. _
___ ;.320.40_
-- -44,-M
.000.00
SCIRS - CHILDREN
291813.35
79444.84
37.22%
209000.00
GENERAL REFERSNCE
19.00
496ac.9C
39.01%
129000.0C
_.- PEUDDICALS- _._..__...__.__
_._ _____...
420.30
_._._29S42.D2-
---1.2 -qtr
- _213000.00
PAMPHLETS
.00
101.07
33.69%-
3CC.00
BENTON LIdRARY MATERIALS
950.95
19473.21
71.93%.
29048.Cc,
CMIPPcNA COUNTY LI4RARY MATERIALS -
-. - -.. __
.. 1.436.52_.
-- .__15..371«92---
.11'8.Q4%-
1402' 4.00__
MJNTEVIOEO MATER14L5
.CO
.00
.00%
10.9000.00.
9M4 E 16MM FILMD
CO .
l,BCC.CO
46.154
3000.00
VIDEO DISCS C TA7c:
345.62
2.334.71 - -
- -- -48.64i
AUDIC DISCS AND TAPES
27.99
95.34
47.67%
2C0.00-
SLIDES ANU FILM STRIPS
.CO
.00
.00%
250.00
MICROFJRMS
- .CO
-.- ___ ..__.O0._
P140ING
.00
222.19
23.39%
950.0C
ACCT
GROU°...
12,109.18
579871.83
34.07%
I699882.0c
. CATALJGiNG
OCLC ANJ JTMER CHARGES
.00
8,549.99
47.50x
1 =89000.00
COM VENDOR CHARGES
59929.46
6,333.12
49.98 %;
129671.06
GROUP...
59929.46
Ilk
- _1883.D.7
Aa -.af_
'0 e671.00
VEHICLES
OPERAtICN AND MAINTENANCE
eo..J7
491C3.90
27.36%
15,00C.D0
INSURANCE _
.00
.19577.19
105.15%..
195CC.00
AMORTIZATION
149385.95
j 239081.45
577.04 %
490CC.0C
ACCT
GROUv...
15,276.02
289762.54
140.31%
20,S,*9 -
COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE AND LI4, CAARGES
791.83
39CC9.97
3S.41%
89500.
T_iMINAL MAINTENANCE
515.CO
550.00
55.00%
I9000.0C
PUSTAG9 AND Sn IPPING
751.50
3,12D.24__
_31.15% .___._83400.00
ACCT
GROUP...
29064.33
69690.71
37.323
1T,9CC.00
EQUIVMSNT
Nc99 EUU1PAihT _
_.
1.495.00
__ - 19189.69___109.48L_--
_2ali00.00
A/V EQUIP.MENT
59.95
651.58
93.OQt
700.00
MAINTENENCE AND CONTAACTS
2,131.26
69692.27
95.77%
A29000.CC
.._. _ACCT
GROUP...
__.. 3,693.21._.
_.- 9.S33.&4_
- X4.85%
IAa700 +00_.
OinEA
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND E9UIPMENT
1lo.12
779.94
77.99%
19000.00
-- SUPPLIES AND PRINTING -.__._ __
_ _...
.__ 99T.81 ..
_-- _-- 16.9A1 -47
3i 9L%
2Q9000.00
PkOMOTIQNAL AND PROGRAMMING ,.
324..5`..
62.6.20,:
129..24x..
500.00..
MILEAGE AWI) MEETINGS - STAFF
t 310.90
1,526.39,
27.75%
59800+00:.'
. _ MILEAGE 'AND MEETINGS TRUSTtx -CL ...
__. ...
_._ 384.98.._-
._- _I9A.51
#.D9f
3.►2CD.00'.
.. PAOF. 'Mf4&ERSHIPS ITRUSTEES3.
9CQ
306,00. - ?"US ._
- 4400.00.
I14SURANC9'
.00
996!6.00 -^
107.62%
990Co.00'.
ADS ABO LEGAL NJTIU S
.CO
13.80
13.802
100.00
AUDITING
19500.00
_ 19300.00___129.0c% .
19200.00 _.
BOOKNEEPINO
462.47
1.15C.60
3x.36%
39000.0C.
CONTINUING* EDUCATION
-
-co
.00
.00%
500.00
-. ACCT
GROUP...
4,168.d3
_23936LC6 --
- 52.63E
-- 549400.00:
SPECIAL
GLENCOE FRIENDS,, 198}
.00
.00
.00%
19532.33
-KCYL. ,.._ _ _ "- -_._ ....__.
_ _
__. ..X00 _
. ___ .._50..00 --------
2- -883
- 1,786.00 -�.
LOCAL EwUIPM -c NT
.00
18C.SO
.00%
.00
AUTOMATION FUND ILOCALI
.00
.00
.00x
.00
STATE SALES TAX _
_
131.97
._666.57 -
" -_ 44.44E
- -- 19500.00
FAMILY TIES "FU40
.00
.00-
.00 %' -;:
293'00.CC
LARGE PAINT s,jNU
.00
.00
.00%
2,613.00
ACCT
GROUP...
131.97
891.07 --
-- 9.22%
.9,733.38
GRG.
TJTAL...-
105.650.35
3929215.52
36.TCA
190689846.38
9
ENDING CASH BALANCE
$193,988.81
$193,988.81
Page 2