cp09-28-1993 cNUTCNINSON
C/ TY
CALENDAR
Wook of
Sept. 26 to Oct. 2
1 9 9 3
WEDNESDAY
-29-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meet
at City Halle
SUNDAY
-26-
MONDAY
-27-
Noon - Safety Council Meeting
at Heritage Center
1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commis
Meeting at Utilities
TUESDAO
-28-
7:00 P.M. - Airport Commission 7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at Airport Meeting at City Hall
Lobby
THURSDAY (, FRIDAY SATURDAY
-30- 1- -2-
VACATION /CONFERENCE:
DIANE OLSEN - Sept. 27 -28
DOLF MOON - Sept. 29-
Oct. 1
RANDY DEVRIES - Sept. 29 -
Oct. 1
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Thor Skeie, Faith Lutheran Church
3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting of September 14, 1993 and Special Meeting of
September 22, 1993
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - AUGUST 1993
2. PARKS, RECREATION, COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY
• COUNCIL MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
3. HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MINUTES OF AUGUST 17, 1993 AND SEPTEMBER 21, 1993
4. HUTCHINSON HOUSING, INC. MINUTES OF AUGUST 17, 1993
(b) REPORT OF CITY INVESTMENTS
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON JAYCEES FOR CITY
ASSISTANCE REGARDING MAIN STREET CHRISTMAS LIGHTING
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
1 J
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 •
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 93 -91 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA,
INCORPORATING AND ANNEXING CERTAIN TRACTS AND PARCELS OF
LAND INTO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET
OUT IN SAID ORDINANCE (MCKIMM PROPERTY)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second
reading and adopt
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 10054 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 10055 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS •
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR HCVN -TV TO LOCATE IN NEW
CITY HALL (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 14, 1993)
Action -
(b) DISCUSSION OF COSTS FOR PARTNERS IN FRIENDSHIP SPACE IN
NEW CITY HALL (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 14, 1993)
Action -
(c) DISCUSSION OF SETTLEMENT WITH STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES
(DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 14, 1993)
Action -
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING 1988 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODES
(DEFERRED AUGUST 24, 1993)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
•
2
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period
- Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
(b) DISCUSSION OF DENTAL AND HEALTH INSURANCE RENEWAL
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) CONSIDERATION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE
Action -
(d) CONSIDERATION OF WATER HEATER REPLACEMENT AT CIVIC ARENA
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PHASE II
AIRPORT EXPANSION
• Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
•
(f) DISCUSSION OF AIRPORT FUEL TANK CLEANUP INVESTIGATION
Action -
(g) DISCUSSION OF RELOCATION FUNDING FOR FLOOD ZONES
Action -
(h) DISCUSSION OF WATER TOWER NO. 3 CONSTRUCTION
Action -
(i) CONSIDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
RUST ENVIRONMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BIOSOLIDS
MANAGEMENT FACILITIES PLAN AMENDMENT (SLUDGE)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into contract
(j) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY UPDATES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 •
(k) CONSIDERATION OF LEASING PAGERS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(1) CONSIDERATION OF COMPUTER PURCHASE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(m) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF ISLAND
VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION SUBMITTED BY WDH LAND INC.
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
(n) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON
TECHNOLOGY INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
(o) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE A 1976 •
MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT IN COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE REQUESTED BY
ANN ROGERS WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
(p) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENTS IN WALNUT RIDGE
ESTATES REQUESTED BY RALPH SCHMITZ, BSK OF HUTCHINSON,
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive first reading of Ordinance No. 93 -92 and set second
reading for October 12, 1993
(q) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY COMPTON -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION
CO. FOR LOT SPLIT LOCATED ON DALE STREET WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
4
0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 28, 1993
(r) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY COMPTON -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION
CO. TO REZONE PROPERTY LOCATED ON DALE STREET FROM R -2 TO
R -3 WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive first reading of Ordinance No. 93 -93 and set second
reading for October 12, 1993
(s) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY COMPTON -ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION
CO. FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT FOUR -PLEX ON
DALE STREET WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
(t) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUNNYSIDE FIRST
ADDITION WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS (HUTCHINSON TOWNSHIP)
SUBMITTED BY LEROY CHRISTENSON WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
0 Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
12.
r1
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
5
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen
John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson, and Don Erickson. Absent:
Councilman Craig Lenz. Also present: City Administrator Gary
D. Plotz, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, Director of
Engineering John Rodeberg, and City Attorney G. Barry
Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of August 24, 1993 were
approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - AUGUST 1993
2. HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 25, 1993
AND SEPTEMBER 1, 1993
3. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 1993
4. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF AUGUST 18, 1993
5. HOSPITAL /NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF JUNE 15, 1993
AND JULY 20, 1993
(b) APPOINTMENT TO HOSPITAL /NURSING HOME BOARD- -TOM DAGGETT
The motion to order the report and minutes filed and to
ratify the appointment was made by Councilman Erickson,
seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
. (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY AMERICAN LEGION TO USE
LIBRARY SQUARE FOR FLAG DESTRUCTION CEREMONY
4�,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 0
7
The motion to approve the request was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO USE LIBRARY SQUARE AS
STARTING POINT FOR "TAKE BACK THE NIGHT" MARCH ON
SEPTEMBER 27, 1993
The motion to approve the request was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani-
mously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHTING ON
CONNECTICUT STREET
The motion to approve the request was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 93 -91 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA,
INCORPORATING AND ANNEXING CERTAIN TRACTS AND PARCELS OF Is
LAND INTO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET
OUT IN SAID ORDINANCE (MCKIMM PROPERTY)
The motion to waive first reading and set second reading
for September 28, 1993 was made by Councilman Torgerson,
seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 10047 - PRELIMINARY 1994 TAX LEVY FOR CITY
OF HUTCHINSON
Finance Director Merrill reviewed the tax increases for
a preliminary 1994 tax levy.
Following discussion, the motion to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 10047 setting the preliminary tax
levy at 15% was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and carried three to one, with roll
call vote of Mayor Ackland, Councilmen Torgerson and
Erickson voting aye, and Councilman Mlinar voting nay.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 10048 - RESOLUTION REJECTING BID, LETTING
NO. 4, PROJECT NO. 93 -05
The motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
2
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
10048 was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Coun-
cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR HCVN -TV TO LOCATE IN NEW
CITY HALL (DEFERRED AUGUST 24, 1993)
Following discussion, the motion to defer to the
September 28, 1993 meeting was made by Councilman Mlinar,
seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(b) DISCUSSION OF COSTS FOR PARTNERS IN FRIENDSHIP SPACE IN
NEW CITY HALL
Following discussion, no action was taken.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF HEALTH INSURANCE RENEWAL
• Withdrawn from agenda.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION MANAGER CARE
SERVICES
Withdrawn from agenda.
(c) DISCUSSION OF SETTLEMENT WITH STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES
Following discussion, the motion to direct the City
Attorney to contact the attorney for Structural
Specialties and to defer to the September 28, 1993 City
Council meeting was made by Councilman Torgerson,
seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(d) DISCUSSION OF WATER RATES
Following discussion of a preliminary meeting with 3M
officials and City staff regarding water rate increases,
no action was taken.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR 1994 ONE -HALF TON
PICKUP FOR WATER DEPARTMENT
Following discussion, the motion to approve and to award
the bid to Myron Wigen Motor Co. for $11,400 was made by
• Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 •
unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR
WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES
Following discussion, the motion to approve the sub-
division agreement with original wordage and deletion of
paragraph 10 was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded
by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR
SANTELMAN'S THIRD ADDITION
The motion to defer to the September 28, 1993 City
Council meeting was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded
by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING ADDENDUM TO SCHMIDTBAUER'S
FOURTH ADDITION SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR VILLAGE
COOPERATIVE
The motion to defer to the September 28, 1993 City •
Council meeting was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded
by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF G.I.S. COORDINATOR POSITION
Following discussion, the motion to approve the position,
effective September 27, 1993, was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried.
(j) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 1994 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the proposed 1994 improve-
ment projects. No action was taken.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT WITH RUST ENGINEERING FOR
SOUTHWEST AREA OTTER LAKE UTILITY CROSSING
Following the engineer's explanation of the project, the
motion to approve and enter into a contract with RUST
Engineering was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
•
4
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
(1) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
NO. 287, WAIVING HEARING AND ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ROLL,
AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LETTING NO. 9, PROJECT NO.
93 -16, 93 -18, 93 -19, AND 93 -21
Following discussion, the motion to approve assessment
roll No. 287, to waive a public hearing, to award the
contract to Juul Contracting Company for $147,055.10, and
to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 10049, 10050,
and 10051 was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
1. ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONDEMNATION
Attorney Anderson requested an amendment to Resolu-
tion No. 10000 adopted August 24, 1993, to show that
all of the subject property is within the 1974 bound-
aries.
Following discussion, the motion to adopt the amended
Resolution No. 10000 was made by Councilman Torger-
son, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
2. WIRING CONTRACT FOR NEW CITY HALL
It was reported vendor bid proposals were received
for doing the voice, radio, network and LOGIS cabling
in the new City Hall. LOGIS evaluated the bids and
recommended the firm of Jurgens /Ebright Communica-
tions at a cost of $15,536.12.
Following discussion, the motion to approve and award
the contract to Jurgens /Ebright was made by Council-
man Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and
unanimously carried.
3. CHANGE ORDER FOR NEW CITY HALL
It was reported the existing PVC rain leaders needed
to be replaced with 6" cast iron piping to comply
with code requirements of plenum space at a cost of
$3,394.00.
I.".
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 •
Following discussion, the motion to approve the
replacement item was made by Councilman Torgerson,
seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried.
4. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LETTER REGARDING ARTS & CRAFTS
FESTIVAL
The Chamber letter outlining the arrangements for the
arts and crafts festival was reviewed. Engineer
Rodeberg will check with the Chamber regarding addi-
tional parking.
5. NOTICE TO REPAIR OR REMOVE
The City Attorney reported the property located at
167 Third Avenue NW was in need of repair or should
be razed.
Following discussion, the motion to approve the
Notice to Repair or Remove as prepared by the City
Attorney was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded •
by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
6. REHABILITATION OF SHEPPARD HOUSE AT 15 FRANKLIN
STREET NORTH
Administrator Plotz reported the Housing & Community
Development Coordinator had estimated the cost of
rehabilitation of the Sheppard House to be $20,300.
He also stated the advertisement and specifications
for the purchase, removal and relocation, and /or
repair of the house had been prepared.
7. COMMUNICATION FROM DON TODNEM
Don Todnem inquired about enforcement of handicap
codes. He noted the bathrooms at the Underground
restaurant were not handicap accessible.
S. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
The City Administrator stated Junker's deposition was
today. Attorney Morgan Godfrey has reviewed the
City's records regarding the litigation.
It was reported the delay in the brick order has
changed the occupancy date for the new City Hall to .
6
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
the end of December.
The HCDC meeting was held last night. The HCDC Board
has narrowed down the list of candidates for the HCDC
Director position.
Mr. Plotz stated the Crow River Quality Council would
hold a breakfast meeting tomorrow.
It was noted the County Commissioners discussed a
household hazardous waste building to be located in
Hutchinson. Some of the property owners in the area
had been contacted, and about 70 citizens attended
the meeting. The County's conditional use permit to
construct the facility will expire September 23,
1993, and an extension of the permit will require
Planning Commission action.
9. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN JOHN MLINAR
Councilman Mlinar inquired about the status of the
• retaining wall on Tom Carrigan's property. He also
commented on the future use of the old City Hall
building.
The motion to put the City Hall building up for sale
and /or demolition was made by Councilman Mlinar,
seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried.
10. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Councilman Torgerson asked about the status of the
City /County /State joint facility. He was informed
the County was looking at estimates, and the City
site was a potential location.
11. COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN DON ERICKSON
Councilman Erickson commented on cars parked over
night on a City street. He requested that the Police
Department review the matter.
12. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Anderson reported the Court had issued
the order on the Klockmann property. Perhaps at the
rh
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 14, 1993 •
next meeting the City Council can award the bid for
demolition.
13. COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg requested approval of the plans and
specifications and advertising for bids on Letting
No. 1, Project No. 94 -01.
The motion to approve the plans and specifications,
to advertise for bids, and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 10052 was made by Councilman Mlinar,
seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried.
The City Engineer briefed the Council on the upcoming
"Bicycle and Pedestrian Friendly Development" seminar
to be held in Hutchinson on October 18 -19, 1993. A
delegation will come from Finland, Washington, D.C.,
and Sister Cities of Kerava and Oulu, Finland.
Approximately 150 -200 participants are expected.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS •
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion to approve the claims and authorize payment
from the appropriate funds was made by Councilman Torger-
son, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
10:05 P.M.
0
91
MINUTES
• SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
The special meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor
Ackland. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig
Lenz, Marlin Torgerson, and Don Erickson. Absent: Councilman John
Mlinar. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and
Building Official James Marka.
1. CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED
BY MCLEOD COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
FACILITY
Following discussion, the motion to approve the recommendation
of the Planning Commission for extension of the conditional
use permit was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
2. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A PERMANENT
COLLECTION LOCATION FOR HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
• Administrator Plotz asked the Council to consider adoption of
Resolution No. 10053 to be presented at the next County
meeting which would support the concept of the facility.
Following discussion, the motion to approve and adopt
Resolution No. 10053 was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
3. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER FOR WATER TOWER PROJECT
Administrator Plotz reported there were two deletions and one
add -on to the change order for the water tower project. The
deletions would be well No. 1 (credit of $6,980.00) and
exterior tower flood lighting (credit of $2,600.00).
The engineering firm RCM and the City staff approve the
utilities change order recommendation to consolidate
electrical service at the park and provide new transformers at
a total cost of $9,931.40. With the credit deductions, the
total net increase would be $351.40.
Following discussion, the motion to approve the change orders
was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman
Torgerson and unanimously carried.
•
N
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 22, 1993
PAGE 2 •
4. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CROW RIVER ARTS FOR ASSISTANCE TO
MOVE SIGN TO NEW LOCATION
Administrator Plotz stated the Crow River Arts Director had
requested assistance from the City to take down and to put up
the building sign at their new location.
Following discussion, the motion to approve the request was
made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and
unanimously carried.
5. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:55
P.M.
0
•
•
AUGUST 1993
EVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
LIQUOR SALES
WINE SALES
BEER SALES
BEER DEPOSIT
MISC. SALES
LOTTERY SALES
INTEREST
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
BOND SALES
CASH DISCOUNTS
1141flim
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1993
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
AUGUST YEAR TO
ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL
42,246.88 320,018.90
12,535.39 92,428.01
80,421.66 556,411.66
(32.13) (416.00)
6,745.41 42,230.88
38.00 1,945.43
5,045.05 11,540.72
0.00 699.69
0.00
(590.39) (7,057.53)
ADOPTED
BUDGET
530,000.00
156,000.00
860,000.00
0.00
54,000.00
4,000.00
1,500.00
0.00
350,000.00
(2,100.00)
AUGUST 19
BALANCE PERCENTAG
REMAINING USED
209,981.10
60.4%
63,571.99
59.2%
303,588.34
64.7%
416.00
ERR
11,769.12
78.2%
2,054.57
48.6%
(10,040.72)
769.4%
(699.69)
ERR
350,000.00
0.0%
4,957.53
336.1%
146,409.87 1,017,801.76 1,953,400.00 935,598.24 52.1%
PER30NEL SERVICES
10,550.33
105,290.85
140,708.00
35,417.15
74.8%
EPAR & MAINTENANCE
988.80
3,370.73
2,300.00
(1,070.73)
146.6%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
5,500.29
39,299.35
42,250.00
2,950.65
93.0%
MISCELLANEOUS
144.9%
698.82
17,600.00
16,901.18
4.0%
DEBT SERVICE
4,702.50
0.00
17,000.00
17,000.00
0.0%
TRANSFERS
1,067.00
0.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
0.0%
OST OF SALES
59,143.41
829,641.07
1,223,100.00
393,458.93 -
67.8%
HER
0.00
100.00
4,500.00
4,400.00
2.2%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
1,616.97
314,701.28
438,000.00
123,298.72
0.0%
TOTAL
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
RECYCLE BAGS
WATER SALES
WATER TREATMENT SURCHARGE
WATER METER
REFUSE SERVICES
REFUSE SURCHARGE
REFUSE STICKER SALES
COMPOST CREDIT
SEWER SERVICES
PENALTY CHARGES
INTEREST EARNED
S C O R E
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
PROCEEDS FROM BOND SALE
OTHER
TOTAL
aPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
REFUSE
WATER
SEWER
TOTAI
77,799.80 1,293,102.10 2,005,458.00 712,355.90 64.5%
(45.00)
810.45
0.00
(810.45)
0.0%
42,378.70
321,835.07
540,000.00
218,164.93
59.6$
1,644.30
(3,960.50)
790.00
11,594.00
8,000.00
(3,594.00)
144.9%
40,881.20
276,098.24
418,000.00
141,901.76
66.1%
4,702.50
31,742.51
50,000.00
18,257.49
63.5$
215.00
1,067.00
(687.10)
(1,202.11)
146,774.40
1,203,250.25
1,590,000.00
386,749.75
75.7%
1,198.10
11,962.03
15,000.00
3,037.97
79.7%
2,801.90
21,184.13
120,000.00
98,815.87
17.7%
0.00
77,843.35
113,040.00
35,196.65
68.9%
62.50
6,755.94
3,000.00
(3,755.94)
225.2%
64.50
64.50
700,000.00
699,935.50
0.0%
45.00
3,340.62
2,000.00
(1,340.62)
167.0%
240,826.00
1,962,385.48
3,559,040.00
1,596,654.52 -
55.1%
33,233.78 498,535.09 413,040.00 (85,495.09)
130,259.38 684,343.84 1,556,053.00 871,709.16
77,622.57 857,553.21 1,953,220.00 1,095,666.79
0.00
241.1.15.73 2.040.432,14 3.922.313.00 1.881.880.86
120.7%
44.0%
43.9%
S?-O%
AUGUST 1993
ROUE REPORT - GENERAL
TAXES
LICENSES
PERMITS AND FEES
INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FINES & FORFEITS
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1993
AUGUST YEAR TO ADOPTED
ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET
AUGUST 1993
BALANCE PERCENTAGE
REMAINING USED
0.00 606,521.37 1,897,032.00 1,290,510.63
370.00
14,005.00
22,650.00
8,645.00
15,848.39
177,652.59
127,400.00
(50,252.59)
28,672.86
1,077,261.70
1,258,800.00
181,538.30
54,614.69
401,993.14
783,575.00
381,581.86
5,687.60
36,536.11
50,800.00
14,263.89
22,162.53
128,735.52
140,301.00
11,565.48
3,095.00
178,196.34
517,000.00
338,803.66
1,250.24
1,722.60
250.00
(1,472.60)
131,701.31 2,622,624.37 4,797,808.00 2,175,183.63
32.0%
61.8%
139.4%
85.6%
51.3%
71.9%
91.8%
34.5%
689.0%
54.7%
MAYOR & COUNCIL
10,135.60
35,337.10
44,800.00
9,462.90
78.9%
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
14,184.40
128,031.00
184,722.00
56,691.00
69.3%
ELECTIONS
31.90
1,331.90
5,980.00
4,648.10
22.3%
FINANCE
19,589.60
188,644.40
262,239.00
73,594.60
71.9%
MOTOR VEHICE
6,628.40
57,994.50
67,056.00
9,061.50
86.5%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
23,000.00
23,000.00
0.0%
LW3,278.00
37,331.70
53,800.00
16,468.30
69.4%
P ING
681.40
5,042.30
6,950.00
1,907.70
72.6%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
98,863.90
839,511.10
1,151,811.00
312,299.90
72.9%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
2,853.50
25,459.30
36,130.00
10,670.70
70.5%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
0.00
35.50
1,750.00
1,714.50
2.0%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.0%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
39,165.10
108,904.10
160,139.00
51,234.90
68.0%
FIRE MARSHAL
1,666.20
12,458.40
29,969.00
17,510.60
41.6%
BUILDING INSPECTION
7,947.20
71,765.00
104,208.00
32,443.00
68.9%
ENGINEERING
21,823.40
184,358.80
306,651.00
122,292.20
60.1%
STREETS & ALLEYS
36,492.30
271,189.30
459,801.00
188,611.70
59.0%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
6,121.50
44,387.30
80,000.00
35,612.70
55.5%
CITY HALL
3,184.10
29,470.40
49,203.00
19,732.60
59.9%
PARK /REC ADMIN.
11,935.20
83,588.70
111,859.00
28,270.30
74.7%
RECREATION
21,362.00
139,532.10
181,008.00
41,475.90
77.1%
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
6,432.30
57,866.20
92,572.00
34,705.80
62.5%
CIVIC ARENA
6,188.10
93,828.10
130,304.00
36,475.90
72.0%
PARK DEPARTMENT
49,863.60
390,344.90
489,603.00
99,258.10
79.7%
RECREATION BUILDING
10,963.80
60,074.70
71,871.00
11,796.30
83.6%
STREAMBANK PROGRAM GRANT
0.00
5,378.30
0.00
(5,378.30)
0.0%
LIBRARY
2,161.90
62,206.90
85,204.00
22,997.10
73.0%
CEMETERY
6,714.10
39,874.50
66,976.00
27,101.50
59.5%
DEBT SERVICE•
700.00
12,600.00
43,235.00
30,635.00
29.1%
AIRPORT
10,739.10
110,924.50
51,750.00
(59,174.50)
214.3%
TRANSIT
11,885.70
77,510.60
114,640.00
37,129.40
67.6%
CWNITY DEVELOPMENT
2,003.70
41,976.50
32,570.00
(9,406.50)
128.9%
S P. COORDINATOR LOAN
14,475.10
70,410.50
0.00
(70,410.50)
ERR
UNALLOCATED
51,320.50
262,090.30
406,932.00
144,841.70
64.4%
TOTAL
479,391.60
3,549,458.90
4,906,983.00
1,357,524.10
72.3%
L
AUGUST 1993
• REVENUE REPORT
MEMBERSHIPS
ADMISSIONS
VIDEO GAMES
POP
CANDY
CHIPS, ETC.
INTEREST
BLDG RENTS
FUND RAISERS /GRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
PERSONNEL SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS
•CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
YOUTHCTR
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS
AUGUST 1993
YOUTH CENTER - "DRY DOCK"
8,378.75
66.4%
AUGUST
YEAR TO
4,300.00
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
ACTUAL
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ERR
0.00
1,084.50
1,000.00
(84.50)
108.5%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ERR
0.00
351.20
1,700.00
1,348.80
20.7%
0.00
381.49
1,200.00
818.51
31.8%
0.00
335.09
3,900.00
3,564.91
8.6%
0.00
186.56
0.00
(186.56)
ERR
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
27.00
25,448.34
34,000.00
8,551.66
74.8%
27.00 27,787.18 41,800.00 14,012.82 66.5%
1,976.36
16,546.25
24,925.00
8,378.75
66.4%
12.50
986.80
4,300.00
3,313.20
22.9%
198.27
6,104.16
10,500.00
4,395.84
58.1%
0.00
51.39
825.00
773.61
6.2%
0.00
825.00
1,250.00
425.00
2,187.13
24,513.60
41,800.00
17,286.40
58.6;
ATTENDANCE ATTENDANCE
CURRENT Y.T.D
DATES 1250
The City has shut down operations of the Youth Center building. Special events will continue
to be operated from this budget for the balance of 1993.
n
U
MINUTES
• Parks Recreation Community Education Advisory Council
September 1, 1993
Member present: Lee Cox, Mike Schall, John Mlinar, Bruce Rosenow, Doug Brown,
J.P. Auer and Linda Martin. Also present were Dolf Moon and Karen McKay.
Not present: Loretta Pishney, Mary Ann Kasich, Rev. Brian Brosz, Mike Cannon and
Robert Hantge.
The meeting was called to order at 5:23 p.m.
Members of the Council introduced themselves, and identified their special interest if
any for participating on the Council.
The Board reviewed options for meeting dates and times. The Council agreed on the
first Thursday of the month, at 5:15 p.m. the location being the Library Conference
. Room, an alternate site will be the Central Office.
Term Accignmentc
There are ten positions from the community at large, one representative from the
School Board and one representative from the City Council and two youth
representatives.
The term assignments varied this first time, four (4) three year, three (3) two year and
three (3) one year positions were filled. Term assignments were established as follows
three year terms: Lee Cox, Bruce Rosenow, Loretta Pishney and Robert Hantge. Two
year terms: J.P. Auer, Mike Schall and Mike Cannon. One year terms: Linda
Martin, Mary Ann Kasich and Rev. Brian Brosz.
This item was deferred until the council is in full attendance. Positions to consider
include Chair, Vice Chair and possibly a Second Vice Chair.
is
.11_4, (zr
MINUTES •
Parks Recreation Community Education Commission
September 1, 1993
As of July 1st Dolf has been dividing his day half time in the Parks and Recreation
Office and half time in the Community Education Office. Communications are
working out well. Some City personnel have new responsibilities. The Fall /Winter
brochures have been distributed for each organization, further meetings will determine
if the brochures will be combined in the future.
The Council raised questions regarding future facilities for the Community Education
Office. They felt that the Rec Center was a more accessible site or perhaps there was
room in the new City Hall facility.
The Council would also like the opportunity to meet with and see a brief biography of
the staff of both organizations.
Advisory Council Member It ms 0
Dolf presented the Council with information regarding the formation of two committees
one to study /develop programming and the other to study facility usage, scheduling and
fee structure.
The Council received copy of correspondence regarding the FinnRa Grant. The
program is giving Hutchinson National and International recognition.
Budget information will be distributed to the Council as soon as it is available.
The Civic Arena updates will be addressed by the Council in conjunction with the
Facility Committee.
V.M.F. field has been reseeded, the grass is coming along; the dike project has been
approved.
Thursday, October 7th 5:15 p.m. in the Library Conference Room
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:18 p.m.
E
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
AUGUST 17, 1993
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: 2:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM CHAMBER BUILDING
Chairman John Paulsen called the meeting to order. Members
present -Don Erickson, Tammy Wendlandt, Lyle Van Hale and
Shirley Wass. Members absent -none.
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING JULY
20, 1993
There being no .additions or corrections, Don Erickson moved
the minutes be approved as submitted. Lyle Van Hale
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF ACCOUNTS FOR PARK TOWERS
PROJECT AND GENERAL FUND
Budget status and monthly disbursements were reviewed. Lyle
Van Hale moved that the financial statements be approved as
submitted. Shirley Wass seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
IV. SECTION 23 PARK TOWERS
1. There are no vacancies or rent receivables at Park
Towers.
2. The Director reported that the CLAP window replacement
project has been delayed due to unacceptable window caulking
joints. New window headers have to be ordered from the
factory and there will be at least a two week delay.
3. The Director submitted for Board review a copy of the
application to the Minnesota Board on Aging for an on -site
coordinator grant for Park Towers with funding availability
October 1, 1993.
4. The 1994 draft Budget for Park Towers was presented for
discussion. Salary increases in the draft budget for Park
Towers employees were set at 3.0% cost of living and lI
merit; please note justification by documentation from Hazel
Sitz, City of Hutchinson Personnel Director.
V. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
1. Rental Rehab Report - The wage determination has been
,11-A (1ii
0
Page Two
Hutchinson Hra Regular Board Meeting 8/17/93
received and is effective until the end of January, 1994.
The Valley Vista Project can now proceed with owner
authorization. The 1065 Jefferson rehab project is waiting
for a structural engineering report because the retaining
walls are pulling away and need to be secured.
2. The Small Cities Grant Application will be put on hold
until 1994 to allow for close -out of the current project.
3. The Computer system has been ordered; the software to
track rehab loans and projects will be installed in
September.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
1. A tax levy of .0131 S of taxable market value has been
requested of the City Council for HRA operations. Ed Ide,
McLeod County Auditor has clarified that he will not show
the HRA levy as a separate line item; the HRA levy will be
contained within the City Levy. Willmar handles their HRA
levy in this manner; however, New Ulm Hra levy is shown as a
separate line item.
2. The application for the Farmers Home Site Loan program
is proceeding; however, some of the McDonald property is in
the flood plain. Fill can be added, however, Farmers Home
will be contacted about potential flood plain restrictions
for their program. Other sites will also be investigated.
3. The Publicly Owned Neighborhood Land Trust Application
has been submitted but there has been no word from MHFA
about our application.
4. There were two responses from developers concerning our
letter requesting acknowledgement of interest in developing
the luxury rental townhouses or apartment project as
recommended in the Maxfield Research Rental Market analysis.
One response stated using essential function bonds as the
financing mechanism with the HRA as owner; the other
response indicated interest in TIF gap financing for the
project. These developers will be invited to our next
Board meeting; in addition, a meeting will be scheduled with
the HCDC housing committee to elicit their input regarding
the study.
5. The Director is serving on a Senior Services Task force
which has been formed to develop a vision and implementation
plan for HCH /BMNH in the delivery of services to seniors in
the Hutchinson area; conclusions should be formulated and
Page 3
Hutchinson HRA Regular Board Meeting, August 17, 1993
presented by November. The feasibility of offering some
assisted living units at Park Towers will be looked at by
Patty McCullough, the consultant hired from Health Planners,
Inc.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, John Paulsen declared the
meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director
• Tammy Wendlandt, Secretary Treasurer
0
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 21, 1993
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER: 1:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM CHAMBER BUILDING
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING
AUGUST 17, 1993
III. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF ACCOUNTS FOR PARK TOWERS
PROJECT AND GENERAL FUND
IV. SECTION 23 /PARK TOWERS PROJECT
1. Park Towers Monthly Report
2. 1992 Ciap Window Project update
3. 1993 Ciap Request Status
4. 1994 Park Towers Budget
V. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR REPORT
1. Rental Rehab update
2. Computer System update
3. Small Cities Close- out status
4. MURL Program Application
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
1. HRA Tax Levy Request update
2. Publicly Owned Neighborhood Land Trust Award by
MHFA and letter from Conworth, Inc. regarding
relocation.
3. Farmers Home Site Loan Program Application
4. Commencement of Minnesota City Participation
Program on September 16, 1993.
5. Presentation by Dunbar Development Corportation,
Frank Dunbar and Carole Kron.
6. Presentation by Brad Johnson, Lotus Realty.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
9
.0
• HUTCHINSON HOUSING, INC.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
AUGUST 17, 1993
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: CHAMBER BOARD ROOM
President Don Erickson called the meeting to order. Members
present -John Paulsen, Tammy Wendlandt, Lyle Van Hale and
Shirley Wass. Members absent -none.
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF JULY 20, 1993
There being no additions or corrections, Shirley Wass moved
that the financial report be approved as submitted. Lyle
Van Hale seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
III. FINANCIAL REPORT
The financial report was reviewed. John Paulsen moved that
the financial report be approved as submitted. Shirley Wass
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS
. 1. The computer has been ordered for the HRA Chamber office
but has not yet arrived.
= V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business; Don Erickson declared the
meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director
Tammy Wend an t, Secretary Treasurer
0
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES
OF DEPOSIT
•
September
20, 1993
Date
Date
Interest
Of
Of
Institution
Description
Rate
Purchase
Maturity
Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TREAS BONDS
644136
7.18%
12/12/91
2/15/2001
373,500.00
TREAS BONDS
644137
7.13%
12/12/91
10/15/98
307,312.50
Firstate
41- 1214999 -8
3.70%
12/30/92
12/30/93
500,000.00
Smith Barney
CMO 80AP9
7.380%
2/15/93
5/1/2018
188,173.75
Smith Barney
GNMA 865M7
7.363%
2/15/93
8/10/2002
195,000.00 **
Marquette
22644
3.65%
05/27/93
10/14/93
300,000.00
Firstate
41- 1211694 4
3.60%
6/10/93
9/30/93
500,000.00
Firstate
41 121829 6
3.50%
7/14/93
10/14/93
300,000.00
Firstate
42- 117375 -6
3.55%
8/12/93
11/24/93
400,000.00
•
Marquette
30017743
3.75%
8/26/93
12/16/93
100,000.00
Marquette
30017735
3.75%
8/26/93
11/10/93
400,000.00
Firstate
41 121821 3
3.75%
08/12/93
12/16/93
200,000.00
Firstate
41 121820 5
3.65%
09/19/93
10/28/93
100,000.00
Firstate
42- 120527 -7
3.65%
09/16/93
10/28/93
300,000.00
Firstate
41 121749 6
3.65%
09/16/93
11/10/93
100,000.00
Firstate
41 121814 8
3.65%
09/16/93
11/10/93
200,000.00
-----------------
;4,463,986.25
*CMO purchase
anticapted payback is
4.332 years with
a yield of
7.328%
This instrument receives
payments
monthly and depending
on speed of payment of
mortgagages
the yield could increase or decrease
** A GNMA with
fixed maturity but has a call date
of 8/12/97
I[]
//l
0
u
DEAR CA �
THE CHrNM�1- of CcmM,-ty-C*-
AND �v nH /NSOnI 3c'S ATk 60fi0IN)N c
�p;��-c5 ,/,j A ,.T-cy--T Tu HIGNUG>}T
1 41- -jZcoFToes Ctf mA/NS,92;-�T
- t-JITH 04MSTI-MS L(-tfTS.
G44gnip,�jL FFrrS TRt kt T ALC.
_. _.BL)ILDiNG cwNr;Ls A"z> Tiff SCS
HpiT_2 /-r, AS or_ -
Tim C 1 T Y - IS __tm 10 _ DwAT
TH E EL EuTTRIG T}�_ USF-D
—i H ti _ C H7Z1577r k3 _ S�eASO� • _ -
_TL'ijo-L -,i 7'_ THi S CnJ '>uR
t'-� CAD A Fez T H L 9-M'-73
- ...
CtuAKI L mcj;-T,NC- AND ?- 1,1rLL
C.xPL(} /n1 - ►n; _Mo�`L ��Tf+IL _ -
f'ti THrtT -Ft 1N �.
KICM
�' A l
E
ORDINANCE NO. 93 -91
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, COUNTY OF MCLEOD,
STATE OF MINNESOTA, INCORPORATING AND ANNEXING CERTAIN
TRACTS AND PARCELS OF LAND INTO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET OUT IN SAID ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, certain parcels of land as more particularly
described abut or adjoin the City of Hutchinson;
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Municipal Board pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 414 has approved the following annexation;
WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to annex and
incorporate said lands into the City of Hutchinson;
NOW THEREFORE, the City of Hutchinson does ordain:
SECTION 1. That the lands hereafter described shall be, and
the same hereby are, annexed to the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota
• municipal corporation, located in the County of McLeod and State of
Minnesota and from and after passage and publication of this
ordinance, said lands shall be annexed to and become a part of and
included in the corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson:
Auditor's Plat, Section 7- 116 -29, Lot 1, Except East
378.2' (3.00 acres)
Auditor's Plat, Section 7- 116 -29, East 378.2' of Lot 1
(6.81 acres).
Total of 9.81 acres of land.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective from and
after publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
• Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
7- AI
• RESOLUTION NO. 10051
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering and the Police Chief
agree that the following areas have traffic control concerns which
warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to
establish locations as points where traffic control devices shall
be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1 of the
Hutchinson City Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON:
A. That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control
device known as a 'No Parking Here To Corner' sign shall be
erected at the following location:
• 1. On the east side of Lynn Road, 45 feet south of 5th
Avenue SW.
2. On the south side of 5th Avenue SW, 45 feet east of Lynn
Road.
B. That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control
device known as a "Stop" sign shall be erected at the
following locations:
1.
On
3rd Avenue SE at Huron Street (1 sign)
2.
On
3rd Avenue SE at Ontario Street (1)
3.
On
High Street at 4th Avenue NE (1)
4.
On
Water Treatment Facility Entrance at 5th Ave NE (1)
5.
On
Peterson Circle at 6th Avenue NE (1)
6.
On
Waller Drive at 6th Avenue NE (1)
7.
On
Delaware Street at TH 7W (1)
8.
On
Gauger Street at TH 7 E (1)
9.
On
Sherwood Street SE at Jorgenson Street SE (2)
10.
On
Darrel Drive at McDonald Drive SW (1)
11.
On
Loretta Lane SW at McDonald Drive SW (1)
12.
On
Earl Road SW at McDonald Drive SW (1)
13.
On
Glenda Lane SW at McDonald Drive SW (1)
14.
On
Goebel Street SW at Milwaukee Avenue SW (1)
• 15.
On
Milwaukee Avenue SW at Graham Street SW (1)
-7cb)
Resolution No.
Page 2 of 2
•
16.
On
Keith Street
at Neal Avenue SW (1)
17.
On
Spruce Street
at Northwoods Avenue NE (1)
18.
On
Maple Street
at Northwoods Avenue NE (1)
19.
On
Oak Street at
Northwoods Avenue NE (2)
20.
On
Oak Street at
9th Avenue NE (1)
21.
On
Oak Lane SE at
Jorgenson Street SE (1)
22.
On
Selchow Street
SE at Jorgenson Street SE (1)
23.
On
the TH 7 East
Service Road at the entrance to HTI (aka
Avenue SW (1) •
West Highland Park
Drive) (1)
C. That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control
device known as a "Yield" sign shall be erected at the
following locations:
1.
On
10th Avenue NE
at
Maple Street (1)
2.
On
10th Avenue NE
at
11th Avenue NE (1)
3.
On
11th Avenue NE
at
Maple Street (1)
4.
On
Griffin Avenue
at
Ash Street (2)
5.
On
Ash Street at
Northwoods Avenue (1)
6.
On
Highland Park
Drive at TH 7 E Frontage Road (1)
7.
On
Kay Street at
Lea
Avenue SW (1) •
D. That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control
device known as a "l Hour Parking, 7:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.,
School Days)" sign shall be erected at the following location:
On the south side of Roberts Road, from a point 140 feet
west of Kay Street to the easternmost entrance to the
Senior High School.
Adopted this 13th day of July, 1993 by the City Council of
Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Mayor - Paul L. Ackland
City Administrator - Gary D. Plotz
•
-A)
•
RESOLUTION NO. 10055
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Install 6 Compact
Blacktop
7,900.0
Road Surface
Cemeter,
Yes
Mid -MN Hot Mix Inc.
The- =following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
Date Approved: September 28, 1993
+Motion made by:
Seconded by:
PURPOSE
DEPT. ]BUDGET I VENDOR
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
7-2.
September 27, 1993
AR \OLD & rICDO-%vELL
ATTORNEYS AT L.AW
101 PARK PLACE
H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350-2563
Mr. John Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(612) 587-7575
FAX (612) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Structural Specialties, Inc.
vs. City of Hutchinson
Our File No. 3188 -93251
Dear John:
OP COUNSEL
xMI IAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. TALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545
FAX (612) 545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389- 2214
PAX (612) 389-5506
FOR YOUR MEQRMATION
k � t
SEPIS93
RECEIVED
oy-
• Enclosed please find a revised Notice of Hearing indicating that
this matter will be head at the Hutchinson Community Hospital on
=November 15, 1993 if it is not otherwise settled or disposed of.
Please mark your calendar accordingly.
•
Thank you. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
emb
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
Gary Plotz
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MDPN£SOT'A STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
DAVID B. ARNOLD
GARY D.WDOWELL
•STEVEN
A. "DER SON
G.BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K. FRET'LAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
RICHARD 0. X<GEE
CATHRYN D. REBER
GINA M. BRANDT
September 27, 1993
AR \OLD & rICDO-%vELL
ATTORNEYS AT L.AW
101 PARK PLACE
H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350-2563
Mr. John Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(612) 587-7575
FAX (612) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Structural Specialties, Inc.
vs. City of Hutchinson
Our File No. 3188 -93251
Dear John:
OP COUNSEL
xMI IAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. TALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545
FAX (612) 545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389- 2214
PAX (612) 389-5506
FOR YOUR MEQRMATION
k � t
SEPIS93
RECEIVED
oy-
• Enclosed please find a revised Notice of Hearing indicating that
this matter will be head at the Hutchinson Community Hospital on
=November 15, 1993 if it is not otherwise settled or disposed of.
Please mark your calendar accordingly.
•
Thank you. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
emb
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
Gary Plotz
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MDPN£SOT'A STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
In the Matter of the Arbitration between
STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES, INC.
-and -
CTTY OF HUPIENSON •
CASE NLZMER: 56E 110 00348 93 Ali=STRATOR: Susan B. Harrow
REVISED NOTICE OP SEARING
Keith E. Simons
Attorney at law
Suite 401
Norwest Bank Building
1011'First Street South
Hopkins, MN 55343
G. Barry Anderson
Arnold & McDowell
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a Hearing in the above - entitled Arbitration will be
held as follows:
At: Hutchinson C=Imriity Hospital
1095 Highway 15 South
Lower Level, Conference Roan E
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Date: November 15, 1993
Time: 9:30 A.M.
Before George E. Hulstrand, Esq.
Please attend praptly with your witnesses and be prepared to present your
proofs. ,
DATE OF NOTICE: September 22, 1993
NOTICE: The arbitrator(s) have arraeed their srhedrle and reserved the above date(s) based on the advice of
the Parties. Therefore, every effort should be made to appear an the date(s) sthediled. In the event that
mfcreseen cirmnstanees make it inpossible to attend the hearing as scheAiled, a party req.estirg a
postp�ent should obtain the agreement of the other Party. If there is no mAial agreeient, the
arbitrator(s) will aske a determination. Alt reaests for postponerents a st be commnicated to the case
adninistrator (rot the arbitrator). There should be no crnmnication between the Parties and the reutral
Arbitrator other than at oral hearings. Postponanarts are subject to an AAA fee assessment, as set forth in
the Rules. In sane instances, postporaments are subject to cancellation fees by the arbitrator. Any Party
wishing a stenographic record a st sake arrangements directly with a stenographer and notify the other Parties
of such arrangements in advance of the hearing.
cc: George E. Hulstrand, Esq.
•
L J
•
City of
771z ,
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Water Billing Department
September 28, 1993
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for the month of
September
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of September. Recommend service be discontinued on
Monday, October 4th, 1993, at Noon.
0
• City Hall Parks &Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
v�
1- 270 - 0835 -023
Gary J Miller
835 Brown St
Hutchinson MN 55350
035 Brown St
131.23
Promises 10 /10
1- 360 - 0215 -034
Darol Wylie
215 Division Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
225 Division Av
117.20
1- 395 - 0316 -003
Heather Clouse
316 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
316 Franklin St S
141.83
Promises 10 /1
1- 395- 0505 -015
Martin Garcia
505 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
505 Franklin St S
=205.54
1- 395- 0565 -086
Judy Kopesky
Box 606 .
Hutchinson MN 55350
565 Franklin St S
166.30
1- 395 - 0645 -022
Andrew Ross
645 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
645 Franklin St S
215.70
Promises 10/8
1- 455- 0316 -071
Gary Piehl
316 Grove St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
316 Grove St S
113.23
PROMISES 10/8/93
3- 560 - 0452 -093
Todd Schneider
Rt 2 Box 142
Stewart MN 55385
452 James St
77.13
PROMISES 10/1/93
1- 455- 0336 -033
Daryl Cacka
336 Grove St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
336 Grove St S
142.99
1- 570- 0016 -004
Sam Poshek
16 Jefferson St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
16 Jefferson St S
89.54
Promises 10/7
1 -570- 0546 -097
Penny Lieder
546 Jefferson St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
546 Jefferson St S
153.80
1- 570- 1315 -062
Dawn Heyer
1315 Jefferson St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
1315 Jefferson St S
115.03
1- 685 - 0556 -082
Judy Kopesky
Box 606
Hutchinson MN 55350
556 Main St S
112.33
1 -685- 0725 -041
Pearl Westlund
725 Main St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
725 Main St S
8.99
Promises 10/3
3- 490 - 0485 -053
Joseph Kopitski
19781 612th Av
Litchfield MN 55355
485 High St
20.10
CC: Cory Billet
485 High St
Hutchinson MN 55350
•
•
C
September 24, 1993
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: DENTAL k HEALTH INSURANCE RENEWAL
Our self funding programs for both dental and health insurance have
been in place for several years. As the attached letter from Mark
Flaten, American Risk Services President, indicates the programs
are working well and 1992 -93 was a very good year for the program.
Mark's recommendation for funding is there NOT be an increase in
funding for either the dental or health insurance program. Dental
• rates would be $16.42 for single, $45.98 for family. Health
insurance rates would be $172.53 single and $386.11 for family.
0
The City currently has been funding 100% of the above coverage
plus a life insurance and long term disability policies for each
employee over 30 hour per week of employment. It might be a good
time for the city to consider capping the contribution. By taking
action at this time their would not be any affect on employees but
would give them notice of future adjustments in health and dental
would require contributions from the employee.
To help in this contribution the city has put in place a flex
benefit program which allows the person to pay for health and child
care cost with pre -tax dollars. The program can also include
contributions for health and dental insurance premiums.
Mark will be at the city council meeting as will Dennis Potter to
discuss the insurance renewals program
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 /
- Printed on recycled paper -
American Risk Services, Inc.
TO: The Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Mark T. Flaten
DATE: September 23, 1993
RE: 09101/93 -94 Medical and Dental Rates
The City has been Self - Insured for their medical and dental
group utilizes the Select Care PPO Network, Blue Cross &
insurance and CC Systems as its Third Party Administrator.
The current provisions are:
Speck stop loss:
Aggregate attachment:
Contract type:
$25,000 per family
125% of expected
Incurred
Major organ transplant coverage: Yes
Conversion privilege: Yes
Northwest Business Campus
3033 Campus Drive, Suite A418
Minneapolis, MN 55441.2667
Tel: (612) 559
Fax: (612)559 -,. v
exposure since 09/01/88. The
Blue Shield for stop loss /aggregate
On 01/01/93 benefit plan changes were made, primarily in the area of increased deductibles
from $100 to $150 per person and family deductibles from $200 to $300.
Currently, the health insurance premium for the employee and their family is paid for 100% by
the City. In virtually all the private sector and the majority of public sector organizations, the
employee pays a portion of the single or family coverage. As an alternative the City continuing
to fund 100% of the cost of benefits, you may want to consider capping the City's contribution
to the current level and any subsequent increase be passed on to the employee.
For the Plan Year 09/01/93 -94, we are recommending a 0% rate increase for medical and
dental rates. For the expiring Plan Year 09/01/92 -93, the medical plan has a surplus of
$116,867 and the dental plan a surplus of $4,616 to date. At the same time, medical trend is
projected at 12%. •
Risk Managemem . Employee lienerits . Consultants
Medics/
911/92 -93
9/1/93 -94
Single
172.53
172.53 0.00%
Fancily
386.11
386.11 0.00%
Subsequent Year
Policy Period
Budgeted Claims
Actual Claims
Surolus(Deficit)
Rate Increase
• 911188 -89
183,949
205,981
(22,032)
36.81%
9/1/89 -90
222,119
126,033
96,086
6.41%
9/1/90 -91
246,153
162,800
83,353
4.34%
9/1/91 -92
252,879
253,637
(758)
11.70%
911/92-93
282.42 6
61 5,559
116,867
0.00%
Total
1,187,527
914,010
273,517
Proposed Rates
911/92 -93
9/1/93 -94
Single
172.53
172.53 0.00%
Fancily
386.11
386.11 0.00%
Total Annual Costs
353,317
353,317
DenW
/1/92 -93
911/_ 93 -94
Single
16.42
•
Family
45.98
45.98 0.00%
Subsequent Year
Policy Period
Budgeted Claims
Actual Claims
SurplustDeficit)
Rate Increase
9/1/88 -89
37,432
26,644
10,788
0.00%
9/1/89 -90
33,895
24,520
9,375
0.00%
9/1/90 -91
34,549
25,564
8,985
0.00%
911191 -92
34,317
24,855
9,462
5.00%
9/1/92- 7/1/92
28.592
x,976
4,.616
0.00%
Total
168,785
125,559
43,226
•
Proposed Rates
/1/92 -93
911/_ 93 -94
Single
16.42
16.42 0.00%
Family
45.98
45.98 0.00%
Total Annual Costa
41,382
41,382
Prepared By: American Risk Services, Inc.'
0 C
September 24, 1993
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: HEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WORKER'S COMPENSATION MANAGED CARE OPTION
The LMCIT has implemented a manage care option for Cities. This
was discussed at the LMC conference and has been followed up with
a memo from Peter Tritz which is attached.
The program offers a 5% savings in premium plus has the potential
for savings by better management of claims by improved follow up
with a provider network. We have been holding meetings with Select
Care personnel who are offering this managed care service. They
are in a position to offer the program to the City. They are in
negotiations with the Hutchinson Medical Center and Hutchinson
Community Hospital to be part of the managed care network.
Negotiations of a possible contract with Select Care and the City
of Hutchinson have been held with Mark Flaten, Dennis Potter and
myself. Mark and Dennis would like to update the Mayor and City
Council regarding the program and its potential savings.
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper - '
League of Minnesota Cities
August 2, 1993
���gl fl4 1172��'r
ps-CEIVED
3490 Lexington Avenue North kel-9 St Paul, MN 55126 SZVZ�Z22`ti
(612) 490 -5600
To: LMCIT member cities
From: Peter Tritz
Re: Workers compensation managed care
This memo will update cities on developments in managed care for
workers compensation, and answer some specific questions which
have arisen on how LMCIT member cities can implement managed
care plans.
What is managed care?
The 1992 workers compensation reform bill gave cities and other
employers the option to designate a state - certified managed care
plan, and to require that employees receive medical treatment
for job - related injuries through that designated plan. Managed'
care offers an opportunity to reduce workers compensation costs
by using a team of medical care providers who have experience
and expertise in treating work comp injuries, and whose
treatment procedures are designed to rehabilitate the injured
employee and get him or her back to work as quickly and
efficiently as possible.
How is LMCIT implementing managed care?
The LMCIT Board's approach has been to give member cities as
much flexibility as possible in implementing managed care.
Each city can decide whether or not to implement managed care,
and the city is free to select any of several managed care
plans. Cities that adopt an approved and state - certified
managed care plan will receive a 5% credit on their LMCIT
workers compensation premiums. If you implement managed care
mid -term, the credit ie pro- rated.
What costs are involved?
There has been quite a bit of variation among the different
managed care plans as to the types and amounts of charges that
will be involved. Some plans use a monthly per - employee fee;
some make specific charges for specific types of case management
services; some have one -time implementation charges; and so on.
- OVER
Most plans now seem to be moving more toward charging for
specific services rather than using flat monthly or per- capita
fee systems. It's pretty common for managed care plans to
charge an initial implementation fee to cover the cost of
enrolling employers, explaining the concept and the procedures
to employees, etc.
Of course, the hope is that carefully
care provided for an injured employee
and indemnity claim costs by more than
of the plan.
Who pays the managed care costs?
managing and planning the
will help reduce medical
enough to offset the cost
Under LMCIT's approach, any managed care plan charges which
relate to a specific claim are treated as part of the claim.
These costs are paid by LMCIT, just as other claim costs are.
Any fees which the managed plan charges which are not related to
a particular claim are the city's responsibility. This would
include any initial implementation charges, as well as any
per- capita fees for plans that use that approach. of course,
the 5% premium credit LMCIT offers would offset part or all of
these costs to the city.
Where can we get more information about managed care?
Kermine Bender at Berkley Administrators has been following the
managed care issue closely. She can provide a great deal of
information on managed care in general, the certified managed
care plans that are now available, and on the factors the city
should look at in evaluating and selecting a managed care plan.
You can reach her at 612- 591 -7408.
City officials are also invited to attend one of a series of
seminars on managed care which Berkley Administrators is
sponsoring in cooperation with United Health Care /Medica's
WorkerCare plan. A flier showing the dates and locations of
these seminars is enclosed.
WorkerCare is one of the managed care plan options which LMCIT
cities can use, and this is a good opportunity for cities to
learn more about manged care in general and the WorkerCare plan
specifically. Even if you're more interested in one of the
other managed care plans, these seminars will still be a good
source of information about managed care in general.
0
•
•
•
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, P.R.C.E. Director
Mary Haugen, Facilities and Operations Manager/ /L
DATE: September 16, 1993
RE: Water Heater Replacement at Civic Arena
The Civic Arena uses two separate water heaters to meet its hot water
needs. One of the heaters is used to supply hot water for the bathrooms
and the showers in the team rooms. This heater is original equipment
and was installed in 1977. The other water heater is used for
supplying heated water for the ice resurfacer (Zamboni) and for general
ice maintenance. This unit replaced the original heater and is
approximately five years old. The standard warranty on this type of
equipment is only one year. Early failure of this heater is due in part to
its high usage and the large volume of hot water required in the ice
making process.
This past summer both water heaters have failed and are beyond repair.
The tanks in each of them are worn out and leaking.
Estimates have been obtained for two commercial grade water
heaters, sized for each application and are included with this memo.
The low bid is from Hutchinson Plumbing and Heating with a total for
materials and installation quoted at $4264. No dollars had been
budgeted for replacement of these heaters, consequently we are asking
for approval to purchase these items from 1993 contingency funds.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9-;D
Proposal 1
Hutchinson Plumbing & Heating
• Plumbing & Heating Contractors
518 HiWay 7 East Hutchinson, Minn. 55350
Phone 6121587.8439
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: DATE: j
2/3/93
NAME:
City of Hutchinson Civic Arena
STREET,
CITY, STATE:
Hutchinson MN 55350
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: Commercial Gas Water Heater _
1 —State Model SBT- 100 -260 NES
3 Year tank warrant
1 Year parts warranty_
_ $2294.00 Complete
i
1- A.O.Smith Model BT -197
3 Year tank warrant
1 Year Darts warranty
2355.00 Complete
i
1 -Rheem Model RF300 -91
3 Year tank warrant
1 Year parts warrant
$2496.00 Complete
i
�i
We hereby propose to furnish labor ate materials — complete in accordance with the above specifications, for the run al:
dollar (S ) with payment to be me& as fellows:
All material is eueronleed to be as specified. All work to be completed In a workmanlike manner according to standard practice& Any
allocation ar devialiun from above specifications involving eetm cash. will be e[ecuted Only upon written Aden, and will became an extra charge
over and above the climate. All agreements contingent upon strikes. accidents or delays beyond our central. Owner to carry ere, tornado and
other necusrvy insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workman's Compensation Insurance.
Authorized Signature shL�!ncs�
TE: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if net occepted within 30 days.
Arrvoplanrs of 11rnpowl
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the
work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
AttrP2PD: Signature
Proposal
Hutchinson Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Plumbing & Heating Contractors
518 HiWay 7 East Hutchinson, Minn. 55350 .
Phone 612!587.8439
FAX 612 -587 -1029
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: DATE: -
9
NAME:
_ �: L�v_E� tir 'HS.sr� — C i'E/�_t�,f' ✓erlst
STREET:
/I1arV- -
CI- TN. r STATE:
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for;
er
_ ed oO
_S-A- .�
vo
- —
I
i
We hereby propose N furnish lobar and material — complete in accordance with the above spcctecottmns, for the sum of:
"Ion (S ) with payment to be male as 1J0 ws:
t
All malarial is guaront la be as specified. All work to be completed m a workmoolike manner according to standard proaices. Any
aMeratian or deviation from above specifications involving estro casts, will be e.ecuted only upon written orders, and will become an smim charge
over end above the aslimab. All agroements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry get, !entries mad
other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation lnsaronce.
ti
Authorized Signature�4 - -st:
NOTE: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if net accepted within
Arrrplatlrr of f rapaeal
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the
work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
/� j
Atrtpl[L: Signature
V
C,
September 28, 1993
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Airport Expansion - Phase II Engineering Services
At the Airport Commission meeting in August, the Airport Commission
unanimously recommended that the City proceed with the work
necessary for Phase II of the proposed airport expansion. Attached
for your review is a copy of the estimated project costs and the
Consultant's (TKDA) estimate of costs for a Project Work Scope
Formulation.
• The Phase II expansion generally includes the addition of the
following:
Terminal Building
FBO Hanger
T- Hanger
Maintenance Equipment and Storage
Parking Lot /Entrance
Aircraft Apron
The Estimated cost is $ 2,100,000 with an estimated City share of
$ 450,000.
The Airport Commission would like to complete the Project Work
Scope Formulation so that the project can be programmed for
funding. At this point, funding may not be available for several
years, but the sooner this work is completed, the higher on the
priority list the project would be.
This is being presented for your review prior to approving the 1994
budget. Formal approval of the contract would be proposed after
your review of the facts, figures and budget.
• City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 n
- Printed on recycled paper - "I e
RING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
SOCIATZS, INCORPORATED
SNEERS- ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS
•
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
SEPTEMBER 14, 1993
COMMISSION NO. 9946
DZ,YZ
Q MRMT TTFM
ITEM
COST
FEDERAL
SHARE
STATE
SHARE
LOCAL
SHARE
1.
Aircraft Apron
$ 525,000
$472,500
$
$ 52,500
2.
Apron Floodlighting
35,000
31,500
3,500
3.
Entrance Road Grading s Paving 33,000
29,700
3,300
4.
Parking Lot Grading 6 Paving
105,000
70,000
35,000
5.
Parking Lot Lighting
30,000
20,000
10,000
6.
ORALS
80,000
72,000
8,000
7.
Security Fencing
20,000
18,000
2,000
8.
Maintenance Equipment
150,000
100,000
50,000
9.
Snow Removal Equipment Bldg.
80,000
53,300
26,700
10.
Well
15,000
10,000
5,000
• 11.
Septic System
15,000
10,000
5,000
12.
FBO Hangar
225,000
180,000*
45,000*
13.
T- Hangar Site Preparation
50,000
33,300
16,700
14.
T- Hangar (8 -Unit)
165,000
132,000*
33,000*
15.
Terminal Building
125,000
83,300
41,700
16.
Relocate Fuel System
15,000
10,000
5,000
Sub -Total
$1,668,000
$623,700
$701,900
$342,400
Engineering 6 Testing
312,000
116,600
131,400
64,000
Legal s Administration
20,000
9,700
6,700
3,600
Contingency
100.000
30.000
30.000
40.000
TOTAL COST - PHASE xi
$2,100,000
$780,000
$870,000
$450,000
•
* STATE SHARE IS A NO INTEREST LOAN FROM ITS HANGAR LOAN FUND.
THE SPONSOR REPAYS THE LOAN OVER A 10 YEAR PERIOD.
ATTB -1
ATTACHMENT A - SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
EXPANSION PHASE lI
PROJECT WORK SCOPE FORMULATION
The Project consists of reviewing the Hutchinson Municipal Airport Study followed by defining
current priorities, construction phasing, estimated costs, funding criteria, procedural steps
and subsequent agreements all related to obtaining Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants
and Minnesota Department of Transportation - Office of Aeronautics (MnDOT) state -aid needed to
complete the expansion of the Hutchinson Municipal Airport.
I • ':• D � y.l y 1. :�M
• The CONSULTANT shall:
A. Provide coordination, input and recommendations to assist the OWNER in defining a
development program sequence for Phase II of the Airport Expansion.
B. Refine the Order of Magnitude Cost Estimate, Attachment B, for each of the 16 potential
development items and others as they are identified.
C. Identify time constraints and establish a tentative schedule leading to the start of
construction.
•
D. Meet with the OWNER, FAA and MnDOT in a project formulation conference.
E. Identify related funding criteria and potential sources of financial participation and
amounts.
F. Prepare a Preliminary Engineer's Report, Cost Estimate and Program Sketch.
G. Assist the City in its preparation of public relations materials prior to an election
seeking approval of bonding authority to finance airport construction.
ATTA -1
Since the services provided by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement are generally of
an overview nature, the items listed below are outside of the scope of this Agreement,
but, if determined necessary, could be included in subsequent agreements.
A. Master Plan, Airport Layout Plan and airport zoning revisions.
B. Environmental assessments.
C. More than four (4) trips to Hutchinson during the period of this Agreement.
D. Preparation of construction plans and specifications.
E. Construction administration services.
F. Assistance in preparation of public relations materials in excess of $8,000.
Sul' g•
Payment to the CONSULTANT for services described in this ATTACHMENT A shall be on a "Cost
Reimbursement Plus Fixed Fee" basis as described in Agreement Article 3.A.2, subject to the
• following additional conditions:
A. The Overhead Rate to be applied to this Agreement shall be 1.38 times Direct Salary Costs.
E
B. The Fixed Fee for this Agreement shall be $3,215.
C. The maximum payment under this Agreement shall not exceed the amount listed hereinafter
without amendment as may be necessary to cover any increases in the scope of work and/or
level of effort required to complete the scope of work described.
Total Reimbursable Costs $21,635
Fixed Fee $ 3.215
Total Contract Ceiling Amount $24,850
ATTA -2
• C
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM:
RANDY
DEVRIES,
DIRECTCR OF WATER AND WASTEWATER OPERATIONS
SUBJECT:
WATER
TOWER #
3 CONSTRUCTION UPDATE
I. Update on Water Tower # 3 is as follows:
A. The physical construction of the tower- is complete.
B. The painting contractor is on site, and the interior is being painted
now.
C. Quades Electric, and Hutchinson Utilities will be coordinating power
to the site 9/23/93.
D. Grading and site work should be finished within the next two weeks.
E. At the present time, the project is about 2 weeks behind schedule,
but if the weather cooperates, the contractor should finish by the
October 29th completion date.
cc: Gary Plotz
Ken Merrill
John Rodeberg
Dick Nagy
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper-
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
N/4
. C
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE.
TO: Mayor and City Council
September 22, 1993
FROM: Randy DeVries, Director of Water and Wastewater Operations
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Rust Environment and
Infrastructure for Biosolids Management Facilities Plan
Amendment
In February 1993 the U.S. E.P.A. Published Rule 503 for
the disposal of biosolids (sludge) in all wastewater
treatment facilities of the United States.
Our facility does fall under the 503 rule and must be in
compliance one year after the February 1993 date. The
scope of services for this project is broad and will
address our current situation and will address long term
sludge storage needs, with cost effective alternatives.
At the finish of the project a final report will be
furnished to the City of Hutchinson and the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. I recommend approval of this
agreement.
cc: Gary Plotz
John Rodeberg
Ken Merrill
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9 -z
9
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PROJECT NAME: Biosolids Management Facilities Plan Amendment
[The Project is more fully described in Attachment P hereto.]
This Agreement is by and between
Client
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55358
RUST Environment & Infrastructure Inc. ( "RUST E&I ")
. 4738 North 40th Street
Sheboygan, Wisconsin 53083
Who agree as follows:
Client hereby engages RUST E&I to perform the services described in Part I ( "Services ") and
RUST E&I agrees to perform the Services for the compensation set forth in Part M. RUST E&I
shall be authorized to commence the Services upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of
authorization to proceed from Client. Client and RUST E&I agree that this signature page,
together with Parts I -IV and attachments referred to therein, constitute the entire agreement
between them relating to the Project ( "Agreement").
APPROVED FOR CLIENT
By:
Title:
. Date:
AGAixvrct Ns.ssA
APPROVED FOR RUST E&I
By:
Title: Vice President
Date: "/ — Z `"�
9 -z
PART I •
RUST ENVIRONMENT & UgFRASTRUCTURE'S RESPONSIBILITIES
A. SCOPE
Services to be provided for the Project are as follows:
1. Review WWTF records for the past five years to determine raw sewage flows and
loadings and to determine the characteristics and quantities of biosolids.
2. Review fecal coliform, SOUR, and metals monitoring insults to determine the quality
of existing biosolids.
3. Review WWTF records to correlate sludge age with the above- mentioned parameters.
4. Compare fecal coliform, SOUR, and metals monitoring results to the requirements of
the new 503 regulations which govern biosolids disposal programs.
Tack II - Evaluation of Alternatives_ •
1. Develop list of alternatives which would upgrade sludge quality to comply with new
503 regulations for Class B pathogen density, if existing sludge quality is deficient.
This list is anticipated to include, but not be limited to:
a. Sludge age changes
b. Lime stabilization
c. Extended cake sludge storage prior to disposal
d. Extended liquid sludge storage prior to disposal
2. Develop list of alternatives which would upgrade sludge quality to comply with new
503 regulations for Class A pathogen density. This list is anticipated to include, but
not be limited to:
a. Lime pasteurization
b. Heat drying
c. Composting
3. Recommend additional investigations as may be required to complete evaluation of the
feasible alternatives. The purpose of these investigations would be to obtain additional
data to complete the needs documentation or the cost-effectiveness evaluation of the
alternatives or both. These additional studies may include, but are not necessarily •
limited to, additional biosolids quality testing, and pilot testing.
1
• 4. Field review existing biosolids handling procedures and techniques. Review potential
alterative options with owner. Expand list of potential alternatives based upon field
review and "brainstorm" session with owners representative. Screen list of potential
options to determine the four most feasible options.
5. Prepare a cost - effectiveness analysis of the four most feasible options. The cost
effectiveness analysis will compare capital, replacement, O&M, and present worth costs
as well as non- cost/considerations associated with alteratives analyzed.
Part III - Facilities Plan Amendrn
1. Prepare a report which summarizes the analyses completed and provides a
recommendation for the City's future solids handling program.
2. Review the draft report with the City.
3. Submit the report to NIPCA for review and approval.
4. Incorporate City and WCA comments into final report.
5. Provide five (5) copies of final report to the City.
. B. ASSUNIPTIONS /CONDITIONS
0
This Agreement is subject to the following assumptions/conditions:
1. Additional investigations such as biosolids quality testing and pilot testing as described
above are not included in this proposal.
2. Design solids production rate will be based on the current treatment plant design
capacity as developed in the 1985 Facilities Plan.
C. PROJECT TEAM
The initial Project team shall be as follows. If any of these persons become unavailable,
RUST E&I will substitute persons with similar qualifications.
2
PART 17
CI: UM'S RESPONSIBUXIIE.S
Client, at its expense, shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the Services.
A. INFORMATION /REPORTS
Furnish RUST E&I the following information, all of which RUST E&I may rely upon
without independent verification in performing the Services.
1. Copies of all available reports, drawings, specifications, design and operational data
pertinent to the biosolids handling systems, including results of Part 503 Compliance
Monitoring.
B. REPRESENTATIVE
Designate a representative for the Project who shall have the authority to transmit
instructions, receive information, interpret and define Client's policies and make decisions
with respect to the Services.
C. DECISIONS
Provide y. _ and full information as to Client requirements for the 1' _ obtain
(with E&rs assists 1Y applicable) necessary approvals 11 permits, .Ite1.1 Project-
related 11 Ln1 1 'J. provide interim on an agreed-upon maim decisions on
Project and generally participate in the • .Y II the 1._Y ss 1• allow
perform RUST E&I to 11Services.
PART III
COMPENSATION, BUMING, AND PAYMENT
Client shall pay RUST E&I far the Services in accordance with the following.
Compensation for the Services set forth in Part I shall be per diem not to exceed $14 ,600.
In the event authorization to proceed is not received by January 1, 1994, this price shall be
renegotiated. RUST E&I will bill the Client no less frequently than monthly, with a
maximum of $7,300 billed in 1993. Net payment is due in 30 days. Past due invoices will
be subject to a service charge at the rate of 1 -1/2 per=t per month. The bill will consist
of a calculation of the amount of lump sum due based on Percentage of Project completed
during the billing period. Unless Client provides RUST EdtI with a written statement of
any objections to the bill within 15 days of receipt, Client shall be deemed to accept the bill
as submitted.
9
waeoratm+s.san •
E
L�
ATTACHMENT P
The City of Hutchinson owns and operates a wastewater treatment plant (W WTP) which utilizes
an oxidation ditch type activated sludge process. Recent new federal 503 biosolid regulations
may impact the operation of the facilities. The City has been monitoring fecal coliform
concentrations and the specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) of the sludge. The results of this
monitoring program will define the quality of the biosolids currently being generated. The
quality of the biosolids will dictate final sludge disposal procedures.
:..._K • .�. �..
Biosolids management in anticipation of new 503 regulations impacts will be addressed in three
tasks. Task I will assess the current situation. Operational records will be summarized to define
current flows, loadings and sludge production. The results of the City's monitoring program
for fecal coliform, SOUR, and metals will also be compared with the requirements of the new
503 regulations.
Task II will include an evaluation of alternative biosolids handling options, if necessary, due to
noncompliance with the biosolids quality requirements of the new 503 regulations. Capital as
well as operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for alternatives will be compared. A cost -
effective analysis will identify the best biosolids handling option for the City.
Task III will include preparation of a Facilities Plan Amendment report. The report will provide
the City with recommendations and cost data upon which informed decisions may be made by
the City regarding future biosolids handling procedures.
nvaxarct M.sae
4
RUSUENVIRONMENT &
NFRASTRUCTURE
1. STANDARD OF CARE. Services shall be performed in accordance with the
standard of professional practice ordinarily exercised by the applicable profession
at the time and within the locality where the Services an performed. Professional
services are not subject to, and RUST E&I can not provide, any warranty or
guarantee,
express or implied, including warranties or guarantees contained in any
uniform commensal code. Any such warranties or guarantees contained in say
purchase orders, requisitions or notices to proceed issued by Client are specifically
objected w-
2. CHANGE OF SCOPE. The scope of Services act forth in this Agreement is
based on facts known at the time of execution of this Agreement, including, if
applicable,informationsuppliedby Client. For acme projects involving conceptual
or proem development services, scope may not be fully definable during initial
phases. As the Project progressea, facts discovered may indicate that scope must
be redefined. RUST E&I will promptly provide Client with an amendment to this
Agreement to recognize mob change, which shall be deemed approved if not
objected to within 15 days of receipt by Client.
3. SAFETY. RUST E&I bar established and maintains corporate programs and
procedures for the safety of its employes. Unless specifically included as a service
to be provided under this Agreement, RUST E &I specifically disclaims any
authority or responsibility for generaljob site safety and safety of persons other than
RUST E&1 employees,
d. DELAYS. If events beyond the control of Client or RUST E&I, including, but
not limited to, fire, flood, explosion, riot, strike, war, proem shutdown, act of God
or the public enemy, and act or regulation of any government agency, result in
delay to any schedule established in this Agreement, such wbeduleshall be amended
to the extent accessary to compensate for such delay. In the event such delay
exceeds 90 days, RUST B&I shall be entitled to an equitable adjustment in
compensation.
In the event RUST E&I is delayed by Client and mob delay exceeds 30 days, RUST
E&I shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to the delay and an equitable
adjustment in compensation.
S. TERMINATION /SUSPENSION. Either panty may terminate this Agreement
upon 30 days written notice to the other party. Client shall pay RUST E&I for all
Services, including profit relating thereto, tendered prior to termination, plus say
expenses of termination.
In the event either party defaults in its obligations under this Agreement (including
Client's obligation to make the payments required hereunder), the non-defaulting
party may, after 7 days written notice stating its intention to cusped performance
under the Agreement if cure of such default is not commenced and diligently
continued, and failure of the defaulting party to commence cure within such time
limit and diligently continue, suspend performance under this Agreement.
6. OPINIONS OF CONSTRUCTION COST. Any opinionof conslnctioncoats
prepared by RUST E&T is supplied for the general guidance of the Client only.
Since RUST E&I has no control over competitive bidding or market conditions,
RUST E&I cannot guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as compared to contract
bids or actual costs to Client.
7. RELATIONSHIP WITH CONTRACTORS. RUST E&I shall serve as
Client's professional representative for the Services, and may make
recommendntions to Client concerning actioas relating to Client's contractors, but
RUST E &I specifically disclaims my authority to dire[ or supervise the means,
methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of constmction selected by Client's
contractors.
S. CONSTRUCTION REVIEW. For projoets involving construction, Client
acknowledges that under generally accepted professional practice, interpnntionsof
constructiondocuments in the field sm normally required, ad that performance of
construction- mlaredserviom by the design profmiond for the projectpermin errors
or omissions to be identified and corrected at comparatively low cost. Client agrees
to hold RUST E&I harmless from any claims resulting from performance of
construction- relaledservices by person other than RUST E&L
9. INSURANCE. RUST E&I will maintain insurance coverage for Professional,
Comprehensive General, Automobile, Worker's Compensation, and Employer's
Liability in amounts in accordance with legal, and RUST E&1's business,
requirements. Certificates evidencingmch coverage will be provided w Client upon
request . For projects involving construction, Client agrees to require its
construction contractor, if any, to include RUST E&I as an additional insured on
its policies relating to the Project. RUST E&1's coverages referenced drove shall,
in such cue, be excess over contractor's primary coverage.
PART IV
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
r1
LJ
10. INDEMN('fIFS. To the fullest extent permitted by law, RUST E&I shall
indemnify and save harmlm Client from and against loss, liability, and damages
sustained by Client, its agents, employes, and representatives by reason of injury
or death to persons or damage to tangible property to the extent caused directly by
the willful misconduct or failure to adhere to the standard of cue described in
Paragraph 1 above of RUST E&I, its agents or employees.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Client shall defend, indemnify, and save
harmless RUST E4.L, its agents, employees, and representatives from and against
loss, liability, and damages (including reasonable litigation coats) arising from or
relating to claims for injury or death to persons, damages to tangible property, or
other losses, alleged to be caused by any of the following: (a) any substance,
condition, element, or material or any combination of the foregoing (i) produced,
emitted or released from the Project (ii) tested by RUST E&I under this Agreement,
or (iii) used or incorporated by RUST E&I in the Services; or (b) operation or
management of the Project. Client also agrees to require its constnctioncomractor,
if any, to include RUST E&I as an indemnitee under any indemnification obligation
to Client.
11. LIOHTATIONS OF LIABILITY. No employee or agent of RUST E&I shall
have individual liability to Client.
Client agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, RUST E&I's total liability
W Client for say and all injuries, claims, losses, expenses or damages whatsoever
strong out of or in say way related to the Project or this Agreement from any
causes including, but act limited to, RUST E&J's negligence, emn, omissions,
strict liability, or breach of contract aball not exceed the total compemmionreceived
by RUST E&I under this Agreement. If Client desires a limit of liability greater
than that provided above, Client and RUST E&I shall include in Part M of this
Agreement the amount of mob limit and the additional connpeonation to be paid to
RUST E&/ for assumption of mob additional risk.
IN NO EVENT AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL RUST E&I BE
LIABLE TO CLIENT FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT,
SPECIAL, OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
12. ACCESS. Client shell provide RUST E&I safe access to any premises
necessary for RUST E&I to provide the Services.
13. REUSE OF PROJECT DELIVERABLES. Reuse of any documents of
deliverables, including electronic media, pertaining to the Project by Client for
purpose other than that for which mob documents or deliverables were originally
prepared, or alteration of mob documents or deliverables without written
verification or adaptation by RUST E&I for the specific purpose intended, shall be
at the Client's risk. Client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless; RUST
B&I from all claims, damages, and expenses, (including reasonable litigation costs),
arising out of such reuse or alteration by Client or others acting through Client.
16. AMENDMENT. This Agreement, upon executioaby both parties hereto, can
be amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties.
15. ASSIGNMENT. Except for assignments (a) to entities which control, or are
controlled by, the parties hereto or (b) faulting from operation of law, the rights
and obligationsof this Agreement carrot be aligned by either party without written
permission of the other party. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of any permitted assigns.
16. STATUTES OF LIOTATION. To the fullest extent permitted by law,
parties agree that, except for claims for indemnification, the time period for
bringingelaim under this Agreement shall expimoneyeu after Project completion.
17. PREVAILING PARTY LITIGATION COSTS. In the event any actions an
brought to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to outdoes
its litigation roan from the other party.
10. NO WAIVER. No waiver by either party of any default by the other party
in the performance of any particularsection of this Agreement shall invalidate any
other section of this Agreement or operate as a waiver of any loner default,
whether like or different in character. -
19. NO THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARY. Nothing contained in this Agreement,
nor the performance of the parties hereunder, is intended to benefit, nor shall inure
to the benefit of, any third party, including ClieWs contractors, if say.
20. SEVERABDdTY. The various terms, provisions and covenants herein
contained shall be deemed to be separate and severable, aced the invalidity or
unenforceabilit y of any of them shall nor affect or impair the validity or
enforceability of the remainder.
21. AUTHORITY. The persons signing this Agreement warrant that they
the authority to sign as, or on behalf of, the party for whom they are signing.
amuxrrvma,mERv.tr
Quality through teamwork 0
May 18, 1993
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrat
FROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Polic Wn
DATE: September 22, 1993
RE: Lease of Pagers
------------------------------------------------------ ----- - - - - --
For quite sometime the police department has tried to determine a
means whereby we can recall employees from off -duty status to duty
status quickly when an emergency situation develops. Many times
employees are not at home when we attempt telephone calls, however,
are within the city or within response range if they could be
contacted.
We have tried experimenting with pagers which are activated and
controlled by local radio frequency. The result is a cost in
excess of $400 each and limited range (10 - 14 miles).
Recently, we explored the idea of leasing telephone activated pages
through MinnComm paging. Attached is a map showing the paging area
• which basically includes the Twin Cities, St. Cloud, as well as our
local area (essentially 60 - 65 mile coverage). This method
appears to be an answer to the need to be able to contact
department personnel. It is important to be able to recall
supervisory, investigative and special response team personnel
quickly when an emergency develops. I believe this idea will
assist us in satisfying this need.
The cost if $5.95 per month per pager to rent. This includes the
rental, maintenance of pager and 500 calls per pager per month. I
would recommend initially obtaining eighteen (18) pagers at a cost
of $107.10 per month
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
/lkg
93 -02 -0018
•
9- K,
MOKKIbun
BENTON
STEARNS ISANTI •
Rush BAR
PO
SHERBURNE •
CHISAGO
ANOKA
Anoka WASH TON
MEEKER WRIGHT ST. CROIX DUN
ENNEPIN *Stillwater
Brooklyn Park
. Paul Ri
i n US * U S
Hutc insson Bloomin t ottage Grove
MdEOO Val fey ApI Eagan`• PIERCE PEP
SIBLEY SCOTT DAKOTA
RICE GOODHUE ��
NICOLLET LE SUEUR Northfield In
HA
O
e Fabautt
w Ulm rl
r.
0
R �y S TEEL S DODGE
When You're In Touch ... You're In Control!
ST. PAUL MINNEAPOLIS BLOOMINGTO,1",
6S6 Transfer Rd 610 Ottawa Ave N 8140 26th Ave S
64S -2084 S22 -3344 8S4 -4444
9 -K
When You're In Touch ... You're In Control!
ST. PAUL
656 Transfer Rd
645 -2084
The Largest Paging Coverage
From Minnesotan #1 Paging Company
MINNEAPOLIS
610 Ottawa Ave N
522 -3344
BLOOMINGTON
8140 26th Ave S ,
854 -4444
Albertville
East Union
Maple Lake
St. Joseph
Afton
Elk River
Maple Grave
St. Michael
Andover
Elko
Maple Plain
St. Paul
Annandale
Excelsior
Marine on St. Croix
St. Paul Park
Anoka
Fairhaven
Mayer
St. Thomas
Arlington
Farmington
Medina
Santiago
Bayport
le
Foley
Minneapolis
Sartell
Be Plains
Forest Lake
Montgomery
Sauk Rapids
Biscay
French Lake
Montrose
Savage
Blaine
Gaylord
Mound
Scandia
Blooming�ton
Glencoe
New Auburn
Shafer
Bonggards
Grandy
New Germany
Shakopee
Bradford
Green Isle
New Market
Silver Creek
Branch
Hamburg
New Prague
Silver Lake
Brownton
Hampton
New Richmond
Somerset
Buffalo
Harris
New Trier
Stacy
Cambridge
Hastings
North Branch
Stanton
Cannon City
Hay Creek
Northfield
Stewart
Cannon Falls
Heidelberg
Norwood
Stillwater
Carver
Howard Lake
Plato
Taylors Falls
Castle Rock
Hudson
Point Douglas
Vermillion
Cedar
Hutchinson
Prescott
Victoria
Center City
Independence
Princeton
Waconia
Chaska
Isanti
Ram
Waite Park
Chisago City
Jordan
Rando ph
Watertown
Cokato
Lake Elmo
Red Wind
Waverly
Colonge
Lakeland
River Falls
Webster
Coon Rapids
Lester Praire
Roberts
West Albion
Corcoran
Lindstrom
Rockford
White Bear Lake
Cottage Grove
Lino Lakes
Rockville
Winsted
Dalbo
Long Lake
Rogers
Wyoming
Delano
Long Siding
St. Augusta
Young America
Dennison
Lonsdale
St. Bonifacius
Zimmerman
Dundas
Luxemburg
St. Cloud
� �*
East Bethel
Lydia
St. Francis
- +�- '- ^^�" -�
Camp a ao"jM im.
When You're In Touch ... You're In Control!
ST. PAUL
656 Transfer Rd
645 -2084
The Largest Paging Coverage
From Minnesotan #1 Paging Company
MINNEAPOLIS
610 Ottawa Ave N
522 -3344
BLOOMINGTON
8140 26th Ave S ,
854 -4444
r.r4TN..\1 r
•
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administra r
FROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Poli
DATE: September 22, 1993
RE: Computer Purchase
This memorandum will serve as a request to purchase two (2) HP 486
Vectra VL computers for the police department. These units will be
equipped with VGA monitors, hard disk drives, 3 1/2" as well as 5
1/4 disk drives and 8 mg RAM. The cost is $2-7� per unit and will
be funded from the forfeiture fund. 8 a1sa-7
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum,
please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.
/lkg
93 -02 -0019
0
9 -t,
•
•
C.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT OF
"ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION" SUBMITTED BY WDH
LAND INC.
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a preliminary plat and final plat.
HISTORY
On August 20, 1993, Rich Westlund, WDH Land Inc., submitted a
preliminary and final plat of ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION.
A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at which time there was
no one present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as
well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
September 9, 1993.
3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, will submit
certification that the proposed preliminary and final plat
meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per
Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned preliminary and final plat be approved as submitted.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Parks &Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9- All
Ss land View
KC
cant PRELIMINARY PLAT Al
F,
-------------
A V E N'U 1 pr
b2 2
OWNER- WON
14E
15
7
Z4 23 - 26 T
0 3 41
F�
J4
4 4 40
Sj- OUTLOT 8 - PROPOSED 37 IT 5.17 ACRES
3t '21
ssIs
2
14
Ell I ED]
3f
It
7
/ .4
11110CWL 14 13- 7
— _ - - - -- — — — - — — — —
w
IN.
r)TTC'Q
IFF 71
lip
17
35
2
En Eno;
CAI
En-.
EnI En.
n''I
OWNER- WON
14E
15
7
Z4 23 - 26 T
0 3 41
F�
J4
4 4 40
Sj- OUTLOT 8 - PROPOSED 37 IT 5.17 ACRES
3t '21
ssIs
2
14
Ell I ED]
3f
It
7
/ .4
11110CWL 14 13- 7
— _ - - - -- — — — - — — — —
w
IN.
r)TTC'Q
IFF 71
/ � xNxr ux( ar fR la � •i »caw» W t(a ii i� ��
Illl 1» I' WY[WY[d110x K[ 1 WSCfIM•t Wi M .Yi N I
I - -- rec; o -- -1,
---- i- -----'7��--- --- wwo_c w--- --- . _I - - -uau• _/ -
� � R NCUiOD I 8 R - -le..N ROAD �2
COUNTY T/
s',R »
- R - -- -- "- -1 i N° s 8 � 8
-H- .N -_ si l ig __ __ I Nd---
____ _______ f
io ROAo
»..l
ez R
�
---� -
. is 1- • ea 3
:
R 2 6 In.ie - -lu
II
of ' I, o ;'i 3 i is
r
�. p ♦AiG J
I R I ^- S•� •3 4
�s x (2E�_R1 uin, �R-��- '. Iw
w '� ad• - iri6 bo t
W„ R q-qt s wN' Rt, I>,.p81
Ir
M q • 1 , 1 Y w r
sk 5
Is b 4 7 " +i OUTLOT C 54' i I ;i•'1 1 \- G u
I
1 rT» � : -- -' I N , y � .ips'• ', '`(' gar- -� - = -- q
r. .. `_- -- ._ _ 1 •`,�° ._AYL__�" ,1'.� � r 0 •�,,.- _ �.N: fY ( I 9fiY -T»
»i. .,t4
t� g' 2 & I Nrra ✓.. - -- 10 y } __,(.IN..T
8 wr( ,•eY
, p.lri
t) JN _M NI !B -� ,•. __1144LL - -.
(gw•gt grlr_;, I 8 0 T T E R LAKE
tj •'R in..w ! Ikd .A' -; io» ;-w d-uSr-�
a.n..':iz, n �.- 11 tm.w
i sk;° 3 i :a �A i (�i} I8 0 y A I s s =8 OUTLOT A B i
All 7 8�� ----- •
I 1W
_ Al ; r
IRr 3
I „ ♦ xv« .r _
E _= n..w f ' %• .`
rc Fc
d
„ R
„
� V '8 IRxl81 N s
r MATCH ) SHE ET 3 -
,\ •s & O IY r E a
14
8 10 I ! RI
at
KNCM saElt (ILY »..w
. 15 $ g I •�
' R 11 I SRI
-
-- t
� ir:: w,r
I,Na11 xgwl .ai. [LLYOWN . ra,..N �-: —
_ '
tOY W F[SOr. p I1 1YfNi p Y,rw4 • Nwtt( i F I 1 _}}l -.
IF -
_I
R 12 181
Iwo
' »!f' i- -J 1 -- -- ---
•'� , » » I<_.... {� , 0� [i, Ill'
\ Nq u'fYr
` -raw �
"?� x w n' ar ( — MATCH I INc A
0
RESOLUTION NO. 10056
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT KNOWN AS
ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION
WHEREAS, WDH Land Inc, has submitted an application for
approval of a preliminary and final plat to be known as ISLAND VIEW
HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION of said subdivision in the manner required
for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described
land in McLeod county, to -wit;
Legal Description: The East half of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 10, Township 116 North, Range 30 West,
McLeod County, Minnesota, and the West Quarter
of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11,
Township 116 North, Range 30 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. That said preliminary and final plat of ISLAND VIEW
HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION is hereby approved and accepted by the City
as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans
and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such
certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit
required, shall be conclusive showing of
therewith by the subdivider and City officials
above described and shall entitle such plat to
forthwith without further formality.
execution of the
y Administrator, as
proper compliance
charged with duties
be placed on record
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz,
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
/ M%
•
C
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE TO REDUCE SIDE YARD SETBACK
LOCATED AT HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a variance.
HISTORY
On August 30, 1993, Hutchinson Technology Inc., submitted an
application for a variance to reduce sideyard setback from 20' to
9'6" for construction of concrete bases for manufacturing equipment
located a Hutchinson Technology Inc., 40 W. Highland Park. A
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at which time there was no one
.present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September
9, 1993.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
variance be approved based on the findings set forth above. If it
is necessary to move gas lines Hutchinson Technology will move at
their expense.
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
City Hall Parks &Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on mcycicd paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
17'
cif b„
W
Z
J
F
K
W
a
CL
CL
RESOLUTION NO. 10057
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW A VARIANCE FROM THE
SIDE YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE BASES FOR MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Hutchinson Technology Inc. has applied for a variance
from Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 for side yard from 20,
to 9' 6" located at Hutchinson Technology Inc., 40 W. Highland
Park, with the following legal description:
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 1, Hutch Industrial Plat
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for
a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be approved as set forth above.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger
of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in
the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the
. surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in
such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect
be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land
in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or
difficulty.
CONCLUSION
The application for variance be granted based on the findings
set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
•
Gary D. Plotz, City Adm.
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
?-/4/1
r
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REOUESTED BY
ANN ROGERS TO MOVE A 1976 MOBILE HOME INTO LOT IN
COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning
Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to
the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On August 31, 1993, Ms Ann Rogers, submitted an application for a conditional use permit
to move a 1976 Rosewood mobile home unto lot in Country Club Terrace. A public hearing
was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 21,
1993, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 9, 1993.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for
a conditional use permit be granted based on the findings set forth above subject to meeting
life safety requirements as follows: Egress windows in all bedrooms, Interconnected smoke
detectors, Verify all appliances, plumbing, electrical, etc. to be brought to present day code
and Verify double glaze windows.
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (611) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper-
RESOLUTION NO. 10058
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
TO MOVE A 1976 MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT IN COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: 0
FINDINGS
1. Ann Rogers has made application to the City Council for
a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No.
464 to allow her to move a 1976 Rosewood mobile home onto lot in
Country Club Terrace.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above subject
to meeting the Life Safety requirements.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
40
/'—A
0
RESOLUTION NO. 10058
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
TO MOVE A 1976 MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT IN COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
iBE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Ann Rogers has made application to the City Council for
a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No.
464 to allow her to move a 1976 Rosewood mobile home onto lot in
Country Club Terrace.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
iThe application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above subject
to meeting the Life Safety requirements.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
i
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
r
AIL
_ a
' s R
a ref., Z i a. ;• g x r_7 • ,-�-. - ..- .-... -
.t
f r.
at v
�7
k
:f :�s �$ 'pt, i I'i� F � • : t r �
iE
r
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENT LOCATED IN
"WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES" PLAT
Pursuant to Section 5.972 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planing commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for vacation of utility easements located in WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES.
HISTORY
On August 31, 1993, Ralph Schmitz, BSK of Hutchinson, submitted a
petition for the vacation of utility easements located in WALNUT
RIDGE ESTATES. The public hearing was held at the regular meeting
of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at which
time there were no neighboring property objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September
9, 1993 and Tuesday, September 14, 1993.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation
vacation be granted based
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
of the Planning Commission that the
on the findings set forth above.
Respectfully Submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Parks &Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
C
M E M O R A N D U M
DATES September 3, 1993
TOs Hutchinson Planning Commission
FROM, Planning Staff - G. Plotz, J. Marks, L. Huhn, H. Palm, M.
Hensen, C. Mangan, S. Madson and J. Rodeberg
SUBJECTS CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENTS IN WALNUT RIDGE
ESTATES REQUESTED BY RALPH SCHMITZ
The planning staff recommends approval of the request, however
further changes in that area will require a replat.
cc, Ralph Schmitz, BSK of Hutchinson
June Redman, Redman Real Estate
City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper-
E
0
9-P'
i
47" E 203.51 1 S 90.00' 00" E
- - - . 70.06
W
70.05 4I
I
r6nci"i
-7o -o0 =1T Too. —oo- 1
1DO i
o
I� of
IN 1
OIIIY
0 II
,. •� -°o i
o
IN' 2 °
I' 3 °ol
IN 4 0 5 ^I
'00' 00'� E o I
o
I' o °l
I °ol
I^ of ,
W.00 i 70.00
_
_?
1 70.00 21
—
70 00 Z
t _ _ 1
m1 I
1 Z9 -24 _ 100_00— ,
- 5390 00' 00"
e°��QRTHW00D
AWENUE
30.00
n
—
I I o I 12U,00
30
2c cl m 1
CK) I 120
S 90 °00' 00" E
0
o
LO
N
•
�- 45G.00
.00 °
EASEMENTS TO BE 1 10 120.00 - I
VACATED I to of
0 UTLOT
I
o� o
O p
O p
n n
30 130
90
ul
N
- 1N
rn
30 1 30
I
1
I�
1
1
I
o�0
of
n
I
I(A
1W
�Cif
U
J
591.3
.180.17 1 lZ 174.4
O
l0 1 i 10-
Im _ S 90_00_00" E
r -- -- -91 Ito
195.52
I
11 �£
0
I6 2 ul 1
90.00'00" E - _mli=
_ _ 0 j
r - - - 205- - - - - 0 �
IS g' 'mow°
10 .3 NI INN
a
cc
L -_S 90.00_00..
r--- 211.65 23.171 i
0
Io �
I° 4 4 rc s 30.00. 00" E - 14000 5 I -S 90.00_00_' E
140.00 I to
I o° °o I I
0
Im 6 ml I
S 90.00' 00" E
140.00 I I
to
Im 7I I�
` S 90400' 00"
r - 140.060 57
I
e
J �
I I I
O
I Io 2 G °pl
-
L -
120.00 _
I LS 90.00' 00_' EI
300.00
j -1- - - I
0
0
14 o °I
O
0 3
m ml
co
IS 90.00' 00_E1
.r
12o.ao — I
to °pl
0
Im ml
S 90.00' OD'_ E1
720.00 - I
i
oo° I
J
S 0' 00" E� 9
A
°I
S o
0 6
IQ m1
S 90-00-00" Ej
1 - 720 -00 - I
o 7 gl
°
Im ml
W
S 9000' 00'_ Ei
o
I 120.00 - t
of
lo° o °_
I
o� o
O p
O p
n n
30 130
90
ul
N
- 1N
rn
30 1 30
I
1
I�
1
1
I
o�0
of
n
I
I(A
1W
�Cif
U
J
591.3
.180.17 1 lZ 174.4
O
l0 1 i 10-
Im _ S 90_00_00" E
r -- -- -91 Ito
195.52
I
11 �£
0
I6 2 ul 1
90.00'00" E - _mli=
_ _ 0 j
r - - - 205- - - - - 0 �
IS g' 'mow°
10 .3 NI INN
a
cc
L -_S 90.00_00..
r--- 211.65 23.171 i
0
Io �
I° 4 4 rc s 30.00. 00" E - 14000 5 I -S 90.00_00_' E
140.00 I to
I o° °o I I
0
Im 6 ml I
S 90.00' 00" E
140.00 I I
to
Im 7I I�
` S 90400' 00"
r - 140.060 57
I
e
J �
I I I
•
C
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
�ptember 23, 1993
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT ON DALE ST SUBMITTED BY DENNIS
KAHL, COMPTON ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed lot
split.
City Hall
37 Washington At,enue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- -Printed on mcucfed Prtper - -�
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
Certificate of Survey for Compton Anderson Construction Co.
That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest .
Quarter of Section 1, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, McLeod County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence
west along the south line of said Southwest Quarter, 691.80 feet; thence
northerly, deflecting to the right 89 degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds,
391,80 feet; thence easterly, parallel with the north line of said South
Half, 167.53 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described;
thence continuing easterly, parallel with said north line, to the north-
westerly line of Dale Street; thence southwesterly, along said north-
westerly line of Dale Street, 163.28 feet; thence northwesterly, de-
flecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 154.96 feet to
the intersection with a line drawn southwesterly from the point of be-
ginning parallel with said northwesterly line of Dale Street; thence
northeasterly, parallel with said northwesterly line of Dale Street,
72.54 feet to the point of beginning.
Subject to an easement for a retaining wall. Said easement is described
as beginning at a point on the north line of the above described parcel a
distance of 50.64 feet west of the northeast corner of said parcel; thence
easterly, along said north line, 50.64 feet to said northeast corner;
thence southwesterly, along the northwesterly line of Dale Street; 21.50
feet; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning.
Parallel with north line of S1 /2 of SEIi4 of SW 1/4
J —.179-58—
1
i
90000
N
18272 S0. FT. / 4
/
40
o m
/ o
9
/ C
/ QJ
/
- - - - -- 179_58 - - - --
/
r
P �
�O 4
P, 0J
P�
Q
$o
i'
4
.0
`6
�C
4
V
U
F I I I
ANA
Pv
O
v! !
Z
9•
•
r 1
LJ
C
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -2 to R -3 PROPERTY ON
DALE ST. SUBMITTED BY_ DENNIS KAHL. COMPTON- ANDERSON
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for rezoning.
HISTORY
On September 2, 1993, Dennis Kahl, submitted a request to rezone
property from R -2 (Multiple Family Residence District) to R -3
(Multiple Family Residence District). A hearing was held at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September
21, 1993, there was no one present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September
9, 1993.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the
request be approved.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request to rezone be approved base on the findings
set forth above.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on mcuded parer -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
ZL
r •n
�j
�� S� C�9 .
! ] r • i
e • l j
1 ,. r "1 1` l: 1 � r Sec • A r
W
' • • \ 1 • '
•
GOEIIEL 4
tN •
I '•i]..x
.
1
• a • L N:
w :I "
�i
a
_
WILIVI-
f' p 4 J
sOUTN VIEW
• ••
'
]
IM
.
A JO T
� rY 1
Lw
�
•
J
..
`
i en.., 3 f f �• J
N
•
— •-
LINDEN
•vnor
EIGHTH
i •
..' ..
•'•/7•
y
1.1 • LI ; ] �n
�'sY.ni r r �•\ �/�;
f--� LAUD. AVENUE J
_
'•"- 1 4q
,y
NAY STREET
✓ _
• !
• , .. r• X10
,
-�-� .� ! 4`:
AVENUE
u
.,
AREA TO BE
R� .'' •1ENUE
REZONED FROM R -2
TO R -3
JE \I
P
z
i
M!1 ,r1L IMIf � !�— • SL
Luna•.. CIVIp =
It
Y l 141. K R
CNICS30 �YENYE
J I
'4 x
CLEVEL"NO Y •V
/ J . V
•
•
C
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: _CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
DENNIS KAHL COMPTON- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION TO
CONSTRUCT A 4 PLEX ON DALE ST
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning
Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to
the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On September 2, 1993, Dennis Kahl, submitted an application for a conditional use permit
to construct a 4 plex located on Dale St. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting
of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 21, 1993, at which time there was no
one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 9, 1993.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for
a conditional use permit be granted based on the findings set forth above.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- P,in ted o+! remcfed r•o+ +e.-
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9- 5,
glnnln el wl En saga norcnwes Ee[ly line of vale btreet; thence
north y, parallel with said northwester #y liYte`"'of Dale Street,
72.54 feet.,4 o the point of beginning.
Subject to an- easement for a retaining wall. Said easement is described
as beginning at a point on the north line of the above described parcel a
distance of 50.64 feet west of the northeast corner of said parcel; then
easterly, along said north line, 50.64 feet to said northeast corner;
thence southwesterly, along the northwesterly line of Dale Street; 21.50
feet; thence northwesterly to the point of beginning.
Parallel with north line of S 1/2 of SEI /4 of SW 1/4
167. 53---
i
/,a
0
/
.-.179.58—
htj�
AnL 18272 SO. FT.
v Q�
900p0, ^p e Q
4D
a�y� 0J` 30 -
QP
s
m $g
4v
m
2p M +
fob
/ V
179_58_
e
/ c
A.
C*
� SE cor. of SW I /4�
s�
..... 691.80--
-- -- •• -- r
South line of SW 1/4 of Sec. 1, T. 116 N., R. 30 W
O 25 50 100
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super
scale In f!!i and that I am a duly Licensed Lend Surveyor under the Tars of the State of Minn 5:6
• Denotes Iron monument found
O Denotes Iron monument set Willard Pelltnen, License No. 9626. Date a/30/9:5
PELLINEN LAIR SURVEYING
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA im No. HU 933592 Boar P1v 15 PAGE 77
J � ,
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 10059
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FOUR PLEX LOCATED
ON DALE ST.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Dennis Kahl, Compton - Anderson Construction, has made
application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under
Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the owner to
construct a 4 -plex on property located on Dale Street with the
following legal description.
Legal Description: That part of the South Half of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1,
Township 116 North, Range 30 West, McLeod
County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said
Southwest Quarter; thence west along the south
line of said Southwest Quarter, 691.80 feet;
thence northerly, deflecting to the right 89
degrees 57 minutes 00 seconds, 391.80 feet;
thence easterly, parallel with the north line
of said South Half, 167.53 feet to the point
of beginning of the land to be described;
thence continuing easterly, parallel with said
north line, to the northwesterly line of Dale
Street; thence southwesterly, along said
northwesterly line of Dale Street, 163.28
feet; thence northwesterly, deflecting to the
right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds, 154.96
feet to the intersection with a line drawn
southwesterly from the point of beginning
parallel with said northwesterly line of Dale
Street; thence northeasterly, parallel with
said northwesterly line of Dale Street, 72.54
feet to the point of beginning.
Subject to an easement for a retaining wall.
Said easement is described as beginning at a
point on the north line of the above described
parcel a distance of 50.64 feet west of the
northeast corner of said parcel; thence
easterly, along said north line, 50.64 feet to
said northeast corner; thence southwesterly,
along the northwesterly line of Dale Street;
21.50 feet; thence northwesterly to the point
of beginning.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent •
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of September, 1993.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
E
•
�J
0
C
M E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE, September 22, 1993
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "SUNNYSIDE FIRST
ADDITION" SUBMITTED BY LEROY CHRISTENSON, HUTCHINSON
TWP., 2 MILE RADIUS
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the plat with no
objection.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
-Printed on recycled paper .
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9- T
TOWNSHP 37 NCRTH
YQFEO
HUTCHINSON
CCDE -2
RANGE 29 WEST
¢NMA
4
IYA
a. .
16
u,
J
SYr
sn
ei
rr �.
wLLtv
SMALL rRACT
OWNf3S
a
i
RANGE 29 WEST
¢NMA
4
IYA
a. .
16
u,
J
SYr
sn
ei
rr �.
a1 COwwp1 Of LOTS.
w ..1 '
N90.0000'W- 25000• - q �-N90.00fWw -- 316JS -- /
_.. .._
S at ARM- TSTeM 1513ASED UPON u
W GL.ANZFR FIRST ADDITION HAVING
..dNG Of N9O.00'00'W
t NCH ; WO FEET
1 s
.A00 ' -a- 099
for wo O L •l0_0944_r_io4�o._
OUTLOT Is 1NO L•TIL' • L. SEMENTS ARE
'..5 ALONG STREET AND LOT LINES I
Boa «ioioo'oo r- ¢so.0o —� 0- 2 IF
I�O,taixsc[_ s L «f4'974o r[- 21053_• -� 1 �
It
-ia L•[x a U .v O IFS \ 1 I_ O O I 'A
i 1I
Ip1 - o O «f0'000°'-W- 2!0.0_0 i I • ' 0 ( •
Q
'L Y.o
_ 0- 1 ,o N I V \ 1 1
' U O O_— 3 L use 00'00 w- 2x0.00
ca
� In ..._ wl _
� 1
590.00'00 "E - 250.00 4
CTION
COURT -,OeR — �MOa
G: ka. ° O 1
• L GRADE [,F'Li:$ 1 o «a`«•0[ „`_, _ �p'1,. _
n e�� L •
�•� a Ow w:1 -- \OGb ` , +' a y'• +- Imo. -� yTL,TY l�flrlwta � i
O.
V s44•[1AT2 east • J� 05 3 I_ 10 -e .�•T =-r.,
v
g90.00'OOrE-250 J0
IN
p
�lOOTN LINE Of NORTH OO «C. Of W 1/2 OF )NO 1A6
0
R FOR YOUR INFORMATION
%
MINUTES
• HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, September 21, 1993
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 5:30 p.m. with the
following members present: Bill Craig, April Brandt, Roger Gilmer, Craig Lenz and
Chairman Gruett Members Absent: Dean Wood and EIRoy Dobratz Also Present: City
Administrator Gary Plotz, Director of Engineering John Rodeberg, Building Official Jim
Marka, Fire Marshal Mike Palm, Engineering Technician Larry Huhn and Asst. City
Attorney Gina Brandt.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Lenz made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated
Tuesday, August 17, 1993. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF REZONING FROM C -3 TO
R -2 LOCATED ON FRANKLIN ST REQUESTED BY CITY STAFF
City Administrator Gary Plotz stated staff recommends to continue the
hearing to the October meeting.
Ms. Audrey Field, 46 Franklin St N, asked Mr. Plotz to explain the Tax
Increment District and if the rezoning would affect her taxes.
Mr. Plotz explained Ms. Field's property would not be impacted as long as
her property remained residential.
Mr. Craig moved to continue the hearing to the October meeting, seconded
by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF "ISLAND
VIEW HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION" SUBMITTED BY WDH LAND INC.
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:31 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4566 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
0 1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
September 9, 1993. The request is for the purpose of considering a request
by WDH Land Inc. for a preliminary and final plat to be known as "Island
View Heights First Addition ".
City Administrator Plotz commented on the location of the newly annexed
property in Lynn Twp. He read the staff recommendations of September 3,
1993, and explained all items are in compliance.
Director of Engineering John Rodeberg commented services to the property
should be in early Spring.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing
closed at 5:41 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the preliminary and
final plat. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON
TECHNOLOGY INC.
�J
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:42 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4567 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, •
September 9, 1993. The request is for the purpose of considering a request
by Hutchinson Technology Inc. for a variance on side yard setback from 20'
to 9'6" for construction of concrete bases for manufacturing equipment.
Mr. Craig excused himself from the table to represent Hutchinson
Technology.
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the request and commented on the
hardship.
Mr. Craig commented on the neighboring property and he stated in the event
the gas main is to be moved Hutchinson Technology will move at their
expense.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Ms. Brandt the hearing
closed at 5:46 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the
request noting the gas main removal at Hutchinson Technology expense.
Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously with Mr. Craig
abstaining.
2 •
•
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE A 1976
MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT IN COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
REQUESTED BY ANN ROGERS
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4568 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
September 9, 1993. The request is for the purpose of considering a request
for a conditional use permit to move a 1976 Rosewood mobile home unto a
lot in Country Club Terrace.
Mr. Plotz commented on the zoning regulation of older mobile homes and the
staff recommendation of meeting Life Safety requirements.
Ms. Rogers stated her home is in compliance.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the hearing
closed at 5:48 p.m. Mr. Lenz moved to recommend approval of the request
subject to meeting Life Safety issues. Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion
carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENTS IN WALNUT
RIDGE ESTATES REQUESTED BY RALPH SCHMITZ, BSK OF
HUTCHINSON
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:49 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4569 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
September 9, 1993, and Tuesday, September 14, 1993. The request is for the
purpose of considering a petition to vacate a utility easement in Walnut
Ridge Estates plat.
City Administrator Plotz stated one vacation of easement is acceptable any
further development would require a replat of the property.
There was discussion of the platting in the area for single family and the
developer would now be building a duplex on the property.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Ms. Brandt the hearing
closed at 5:52 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the
request. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
0 3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
(f) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT AND REZONING FROM R -2 TO R -3
LOCATED ON DALE ST REQUESTED BY DENNIS KAHL,
COMPTON- ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO
Chairman Gruen opened the hearing at 5:51 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4570 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
September 9, 1993. The request is for the purpose of considering a rezoning
and lot split located on Dale St. submitted by Dennis Kahl, Compton -
Anderson Construction.
City Administrator Gary Plotz commented on the request and explained the
staff recommendation requiring adequate parking. City Engineer John
Rodeberg stated service is available for a duplex on the property.
Mr. Kahl stated they do comply with the parking requirement.
Mr. Gilmer moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing
closed at 5:55 p.m.
Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the lot split and the rezoning from R -2 .
to R -3. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
4 PLEX ON DALE ST REQUESTED BY DENNIS KAHL, COMPTON-
ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION CO
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:56 p.m. with the reading of
publication #4571 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
September 9, 1993. The request is for the purpose of considering a request
for a conditional use permit to construct a 4 plex on property located on Dale
St.
Mr. Plotz commented on the multiple family unit in an R -3 district requiring
a conditional use permit. He stated the parking has been addressed.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Ms. Brandt the hearing
closed at 5:58 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the
request. Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
4 •
E
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF REQUEST BY PAUL BETKER FOR REZONING, LOT
SPLIT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOCATED ON MICHIGAN
ST
City Administrator Gary Plotz commented on the history of the request and
the fact the Planning Commission denied the request last month.
Mr. Betker stated he was confused as to what he could do with the property.
Building Official Jim Marka explained the staff recommendation to replat the
property. Mr. Betker stated he is unsure of the use at this time.
Mr. Plotz explained the ordinance requires a site plan on a rezoning request.
Discussion followed on the use of the property and the platting possibility.
5. NEW BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER FOR PROPERTY ON 849 2ND AVE
SW
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the history of the request for a
variance in May of 1991 requested by Mr. Lyle Falling for the extension of a
garage. Mr. Betker would like to add to the north and maintain a 5.8'
setback the hardship being a narrow lot. He stated if the foundation is not
sound he would rebuild and then try to maintain an 8' setback.
Mr. Lenz voiced concern with the present condition of the building and the
fact if replacement is necessary the setback of 8' should be maintained.
Discussion followed on the R -1 district requirements.
5
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
(b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SUNNYSIDE FIRST
ADDITION SUBMITTED BY LEROY CHRISTENSON, HUTCHINSON
TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
City Administrator Plotz explained the three step process and the planning
commission considered the sketch plan in March. The planning staff had
recommendations at that time and would approve with the same
recommendations also noting the proposed street name would be a street
already in the city.
Ms. Christensen stated they are now aware of the street name problem and
will be changing their proposal.
Mr. Lenz move to approve the preliminary plat with no objection, seconded
by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH SUBMITTED BY FRANK FAY ON
WILLIS MILLER PROPERTY IN HUTCHINSON TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
E
Mr. Plotz commented on his conversations with Mr. Fay and stated no action •
is needed.
(d) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE SECTION 8.18,
SUBDIVISION 2 (B) REGARDING FLOOD FRINGE PERMITTED USE
Building Official Jim Marka explained the ordinance of 500 sq. ft. in the
flood fringe which is not quite adequate 576 sq. ft. is workable.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the history of the conditional
use permit request and location of the facility. He explained the notification
requirement by the State and the property owners that originally were notified.
He commented on notification of property owners within 1000' as a courtesy
for this meeting. He also commented on a diagram of the facility and the
setbacks from the R -3 district.
County Zoning Administrator Ed Homan commented on the proposal applied
for in March. He stated there has been a delay in the building and bidding
•
19
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
process. Mr. Homan stated the building would be an architectural design and
a task force has been in place for 2 years researching the concept of the
facility. He presented pictures of the St. Cloud facility.
City Administrator Gary Plotz commented on the present zoning of the
property and allowable uses conditionally permitted in that zoning district.
Mr. Butch Irvin, 400 Northwoods, a member of Word of Life Ministries,
commented on the County Commissioners meeting and the concerns of the
public. He stated users would not be in favor of the facility. Mr. Irvin asked
about the location and the reasons for the choice.
Mr. Craig commented on the Planning Commission and their duties
establishing land use.
Mr. Paul Melchoir, County Environmentalist, commented on the public
concerns and research leading to the decision of the type of facility and
location. He explained the fair grounds choice was a positive accessibility
decision. The area is close to the shopping area for people who come to
• Hutchinson from other communities.
County Commissioner Eloi Hamre commented on the board of commissioners
vote and explained all the commissioners sit on the Solid Waste committee,
only one commissioner has a vote.
•
Mr. Gruett again explained the duties of the Planning Commission as it
makes a decision on this request.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the type of products found in the
facility and the fact these products are all found in any hardware store.
Ms. Esther Christensen, Hutchinson Twp., questioned the use and length of
time the products would be in the facility.
Fire Marshal Mike Palm explained the use of the facility and that these
products will not be in the facility indefinitely but moved for proper disposal.
He state he will inspect the facility monthly. Hazardous Household wastes
are illegal to dispose of in a landfill.
Mr. Ed Homan stated Minnesota presently has 23 facilities and 13 proposed
currently.
7
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/93
Mr. David Broll, 547 Milwaukee, asked why not consider a mobile facility and
he again questioned the noticing of property owners.
Mr. Plotz again explained the State Statute and City Code governing the
requirement of public notices. He also stated the planning commission would
be looking at the land use issue.
Mr. Ed Homan commented he would be happy to meet with the public on
costs and funding of the facility.
Ms. Julie Schaffer, Century Ave., commented on the county meeting
regarding single county use or regional use.
Mr. Melchoir explained the expansion could be in use not the facility.
Mr. Plotz stated a physical expansion would have to come back for another
conditional use permit.
0
Mr. Barry Schaffer, Century Ave., asked if public opinion would change the
Planning Commission's decision.
•
Mr. Lenz again stated the Planning Commission advises the City Council on
land use items and does the research and follows the ordinances regarding
land use.
Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the 6 month extension,
seconded by Mr. Gilmer.
(f) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Mr. Plotz commented on a request for rezoning within the 2 mile radius in
Hutchinson Twp. from agricultural to industrial.
Mr. Rodeberg stated Barr Engineering commented on the park berm having
no effect on the 100 year flood.
Mr. Marka commented on the budget including seminars for the commission.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
8 •
DAVID B.ARNOLD
SOAHY D. MCDOWELL
TEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON*
STEVEN S. HOOE
LAURA $, FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES =LEY
RICHARD O. MCOEE
CATHRYN D. REBER
OINA M. BRANDT
September 24, 1993
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O.BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Airport Condemnation Matter
Our File No. 3244 -93069
Dear Gary:
OP COUNSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. TAT LIEN
5861 CEDAR I.ARE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545
PAX (612) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(612)389 -2214
PAX (612)389 -5506
ti SEP1993
RECEIVED
N
�� BY
• Enclosed herewith please find a resolution authorizing commencement
of the condemnation of airport property.
Please have this placed on the agenda for approval by the City
Council.
11
Thank you.
Very tr ^jyog4s,
G. WWIY Anderson
GBA : lih
Enclosure
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MLNNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
-CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
. Y
11
U
•
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACQUISITION OF
REAL ESTATE FOR AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. iOO60
THIS RESOLUTION is made and entered into this _ day of
September, 1993, by the Hutchinson City Council.
RECITALS:
1. The City of Hutchinson presently operates a municipal
airport.
2. In order to fully comply with safety standards of the
State and Federal government and to expand the airport to provide
better service to the residents, taxpayers and businesses of the
City of Hutchinson, acquisition of additional real estate for
airport purposes, as well as other municipal purposes, is required.
3. Certain property consisting of approximately 18.95 acres,
is required for expansion purposes, with said property presently
owned by the McLeod County Agricultural Association and legally
described as follows:
Lot 2, Block 2, Fairground's Addition to the City of
Hutchinson, McLeod County, Minnesota.
4. Certain property consisting of approximately .479 acres,
-is required for expansion purposes, with said property persently
owned by Ernest Svanda and Beverly Svanda and legally described as
follows:
That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 13, Township 116 North, Range 30 West of the 5th
Princinal Meridian. described as follows:
Beginning at a point of the westerly right of way line of
State Highway No. 15, a distance of 630.49 feet southerly
of the north line of said Northeast Quarter; thence
southerly, along said right of way line, a distance of
100.00 feet; thence westerly, parallel with said north
line, a distance of 208.71 feet; thence northerly,
parallel with said right of way line, a distance of
100.00 feet; thence easterly, parallel with said north
line, a distance of 208.71 feet to the point of
beginning.
5. Acquisition by the municipality
real estate furthers important public
objectives including but not limited to
reliability of the municipal airport and
municipal airport to the residents of the
-1-
of the above described
policy and municipal
increased safety and
better service by the
City of Hutchinson.
r
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City
of Hutchinson, Minnesota: that the law firm of Arnold & McDowell, •
as counsel for the City of Hutchinson, is hereby authorized to
commence and complete eminent domain proceedings pursuant to
Chapter 117 of Minnesota Statutes for the purpose of acquiring the
above described real estate including authorization to acquire the
above described property, by the use of the accelerated acquisition
provisions ( "Quick Take ") of Chapter 117 of Minnesota Statutes.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this _ day of
September, 1993.
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
-2-
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
•
•
9.
C�
•
•
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Sep 28 1953 09:05:20
-------------------------------------------- ------ ---- - - - -- --
Page 1
1992 IMPRO.BDS
DUININCK BROS, INC. EST 10 -LET 2 -92 -02 & 0 $950.00
$950.00
CENTRAL GARAGE
BRANDON TIRE CO
3 GRIPPER TIRES
$388.32
COAST TO COAST
SUPPLIES
$11.70
DYSON OIL INC
DY -100
$176.40
JERRYS TRANSMISSION
GASKETS
$30.47
L & P SUPPLY CO
AIR FILTER
$21.16
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
BREATHER
$12.96
MEIER, DOUG
SAFETY FRAMES
$25.00
NORDIC TRUCK PARTS INC
REFLECTIVE TAPE
$12.93
SPEC MATERIALS INC
CHAIN ASSY, DEFLECTOR
$67.51
TWO WAY COMM INC
WIRE ANT'S
$17.89
CAMERA SHOP
DEV PRINT
$764.34
GENERAL FUND
AAGARD WEST
SEPT TRASH
$S69.91
ALBINSON
RED STAKE CHASER
$113.75
AM RISK SERVICES
SEPT SERVICES
$600.00
AUTOMATION SUPPLY CO
INKJET CARTRIDGES
$102.93
BENNETT OFFICE SUP.
SERVICE CONTRACT
$55.63
BERNICK & LIFSON
PROF SERVICES
$750.00
BRINKMAN STUDIO
FILM, PHOTOS
$27.87
BROOKS, LOUISE
SKATING REFUND
$102.00
C.RIVER VET CLINIC
K -9 FOOD
$417.45
CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY
BOND PAPER
$81.32
CAMERA SHOP
DEV PRINT
$9.85
CELLULAR 2000
SEPT SERVICE
$233.75
CENTRAL GARAGE
AUG REPAIRS
$9,412.52
CENTURY LABS
BOWL CLEANER
$164.66
COAST TO COAST
SUPPLIES
$232.25
COUNTY RECORDER
NUSSBAUM - HOECKE ABSTRA
$89.50
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR REG. FEES
$808.00
DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
SPEC ENG- C.PAULSON
$20.00
EARL ANDERSON ASSOC
TRAFFIC PAINT
$257.68
ERICKSON OIL PROD
FUEL
$4.96
FAMILY REXALL DRUG
PHOTOS, SCISSORS, ETC
$37.81
FRONT LINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE
CHROME ADAPTERS
$416.35
GALLES, LORI
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$25.00
GIS /LIS '93
REG- L.HUHN
$290.00
GOPHER SPORT
WOSMARKERS
$166.01
GREAT PLAINS SUPPLY
DRY WALL
$262.84
GUARDIAN PEST CTL
SEPT SERVICE
$21.57
HAUGEN, MARV
CONFERENCE MILEAGE
$74.25
HCVN- CH. #10
SETTLEMENT
$14,980.98
HED, MARILYN
MEETING EXPENSES
$61.53
HOVERSTEN, CHRIS
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$25.00
HUTCH MFG & SALES
GUN RACK
$725.00
HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO
SEAT
$15.98
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
GAS & ELEC
$8,057.49
ICMA
DUES
$457.23
INN, SPOTS
36 ASTROBRIGHT
$4.94
JOES SPORT SHOP
PLAQUE
$26.63
K MART
FILM, CAMERA
$144.92
KENNEY. BARB
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$50.00
•
•
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Sep 28 1993 09:05:20
Page 2
L & P SUPPLY CO
REPAIR
$157.30
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
2ND QTR GEN LIAR
$46,535.25
MAIERS, CINDY
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$25.00
MANKATO MOBILE RADIO
SPEAKER MIC
$79.55
MARKA, JAMES
ICBO CONFERENCE
$636.41
MARKHURD
AERIAL SURVEY
$4,850.00
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
COFFEE
$28.20
MCLEOD CTY EMERGENCY SERVICES
ADM REIMBURSEMENT FOR
$1,824.00
MEEKER SAND & GRAVEL
SAND & P.ROCK
$826.21
MID CON SYSTEMS INC
TARGONE
$69.50
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
FINE MIX
$55.91
MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
TIPS
$93.92
MINNE- SEW -TA VAC
RICCAU 2200 VAC
$399.38
MN.ASSN.OF CEM.OFFICIALS
REG- F.GROEHLER
$105.00
MOGARD, STEVE
MILEAGE
$29.70
NICKLASSON ATHLETIC CO
BASKETBALL NETS
$37.13
NISKA, PATSY
MILEAGE, LUNCH
$64.16
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
GAL S -HOD
$9.07
OFFICE PRODUCTS
CARTRIDGES
$201.60
OLSONS LOCKSMITH
GRIPSET, RETAP
$37.08
PALM, MIKE
MEETING EXPENSE
$8.00
PLOTZ, GARY D.
MEETING EXPENSES
$17.44
QUAST, GEORGE
GAS KEY REFUND
$30.00
RADISSON HOTEL SOUTH
LODGING- F.GROEHLER
$89.00
REINER, KURT
30 BALES STRAW
$45.00
SCHRAMM IMPLEMENT
FREIGHT CHARGES
$7.91
SCHWARZE, JEFF
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$25.00
SHARE CORP
CLEANERS
$188.72
SHOPKO
WHISTLES, BATTERIES
$26.52
SHOUTZ, MARK
REG FOR USPCA TRACK TR
$25.00
SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY
MUFFLER, SCREWS
$16.97
STANDARD PRINTING
LIFT OFF, RIBBONS, PEN
$26.80
STATE TREASURER
RECERTIFICATION C.E.
$20.00
TRI CO WATER COND
20 BAGS SALT
$88.18
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
4 BAGS TURF MIX II
$478.60
TWO WAY COMM INC
MODIFY PAGERS
$1,208.96
U S POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER
$225.00
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
LUMBER
$88.19
UNIVERSITY OF MN
2 REG -MEIER & KARG
$100.00
VICTORIAN INN
30 BUFFETS
$382.69
VIKING INT PRODUCTS
POLY BAGS
$309.40
WAL -MART
CALCULATOR
$34.50
WHITING, LYNN
VOLLEYBALL REFUND
$25.00
WM MUELLER & SONS
A.C.FINE
$423.61
ZEE MEDICAL SERV
TWEEZER, ZEE STRIPS
$17.79
$102.072.21
WATER /SEWER FUND
AAGARD WEST
SEPT TRASH
$276.75
CENTRAL GARAGE
AUG REPAIRS
$527.94
COAST TO COAST
SUPPLIES
$22.44
DEMEYER, JAMES
REFUND OF DOUBLE PAYME
$15.24
EVEREST CONSTRUCTION
REFUND OF DOUBLE PAYME
$136.45
FITZLOFF HARDWARE
2 MULCH BLADE REFUNDS
$10.00
GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE
REPAIR GEAR REDUCER
$2,516.11
GIS /LIS '93
REG- R.NAGY
$190.00
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
GAS & ELEC
$164.04
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
REPLACE HYD
$1,374.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
2NO QTR GEN LIAB
$7,880.00
•
•
•
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue
Sep 28 1993 09:05:20
Page 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCGRAW, MARK
REFUND OF DOUBLE PAYME
$141.05
NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY
HYDRANT METER GAL
$564.39
RICHARD LARSON BUILDERS
REFUND OF DOUBLE PAYME
$83.45
SANIFILL INC
TRASH LOADS AUG 'i3 27
$7,667.93
SERV -O -CAL
TROUBLESHOOT INSTRUMEN
$115.00
SMITH, KEN
REFUND OF DOUBLE PAYME
$12.60
TWO WAY COMM INC
REPAIR
$30.00
U S POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILL
$IGS.00
WATERPRO
METER
$1,548.93
$23,443.32
YOUTH CENTER
TODD TEPLEY DJ FOR YOUTH CENTER OC $100.00
$100.00
$127,329.87
r�
•
•
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Sep 28 1993 09:03:38
GENERAL FUND
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DEPT.NATURAL RESOURCES
GIS /LIS '93
PAYROLL FUND
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
G.T. GROWTH
GLOBAL FUNDS INC
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO
H.R.L.A.P.R.
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
PERA LIFE INS CO.
PERA- D.C.P.
PRUDENTIAL
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
TEMPLETON INC
WADELL & REED
WITHHOLDING TAX ACCT
DNR REG FEES
TITLE REG FEES
REGISTRATION FEE -J.ROO
CO. EMPLOYEE CONT- DEF.COMP
EMPLOYEE CONT- CANCER I
EMPLOYEE CONT -DEF. COM
EMPLOYEE CONT -DEF. COM
EMPLOPYEE CONT -DEF. CO
EMPLOYEE CONT - PENSIO
EMPLOYEE CONT -DEF. COM
EMPLOYEE CONTRI.STATE
EMPLOYEE CONT - LIFE I
EMPLOYER CONT PENSION
EMPLOYEE CONT -DEF. COM
EMPLOYER CONT - PENSIO
EMPLOYEE CONT -DEF. COM
EMPLOYEE CONT. -DEF. CO
EMPLOYER- SOC. SEC
Page 1
r, ryy
ri ri r�
ri5
$545.00
$139.24
5175.00
$318.46
$110.00
$157.46
$1,514.00
$4,953.86
$123.00
$57.42
$140.00
$11,642.42
$95.00
$150.00
$24,773.18
$44.894.04
$45,365.04
0
•
•
HANDWRITTEN CHECKS Sep 28 1993
LIQUOR FUND
Bernicks Pepsi
Bernicks Pepsi
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Coast to Coast
Ed Phillips
Friendly Bev
Griggs Cooper
Hermel Wholesale
Hutch Leader
Johnson Bros
Jordan Bev
Junker
KDUZ
Lenneman Bev
Locher Bros
Lundholm, Lori
L &B Partnership
McLeod Cty Recorder
MN Dept of Revenue
Pro Maintenance
Pro Maintenance
Quality Wine
Sprengler Trucking
Tri County Water
Triple G
Universal Publications
Viking Coca Cola
Viking Coca Cola
Witte Sanitation
POP
106.02
POP
148.29
lottery sales
2,118.00
lottery sales
826.00
payroll 9 -17
5,767.21
payroll 9 -3
5,579.92
tie dispenser
2.55
wine & liquor
12,440.12
beer
418.00
wine & liquor
10,890.37
cigarettes
312.94
advertising
18.38
wine & liquor
6,694.93
beer
729.70
refuse charges
166.78
sponsor Huskies
80.00
beer
6,701.25
beer
14,424.22
clean windows
42.67
mugs
236.82
filing fees
19.50
Aug sales tax
12,587.60
clean carpet
188.19
clean carpet
191.70
wine & liquor
6,560.98
freight
512.15
cooler rental
26.76
beer
21,456.65
motel directories
120.00
POP
456.50
POP
163.15
dumpster for old store
177.65
TOTAL
$110,165.00
C
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO:
Mayor and Council
FROM:
Dolf Moon, Director PRCE
DATE:
September 27, 1993
RE:
Park Vandalism
For your information I have attached pictures of the vandalism
that was discovered in the rest rooms Thursday morning, September
23, 1993.
Estimates for replacement items are around $2,700. This excludes
installation costs. The rest room facilities that sustained damage include
both mens and womens rest rooms at Optimist Park and both rest room
facilities located at Masonic West River Park.
As the final quotations come in I will be working with Ken to address
the situation. Also the repairs that will be made will be in compliance
with ADA legislation. As a result of this damage, the facilities have
closed. Typically the closing dates have been Columbus Day, October
11th.
City Hall Parks 6 Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchiltsolt, Millltesota 55350
- Prrn ted on rtryded paper .
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
c.
1' YOUR 1' + 1
September 28, 1993
I:a 1
TO: MAYOR do CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: FEMA REIMBURSEMENT TO CITY
The City of Hutchinson has received a grant for damages incurred
during the heavy rain and storm of June 1993. The claim submitted
was for a total of $62,638. We have no received from the Federal
Government a check for 75% (their share) for $45,612. We have paid
to McLeod County Emergency Service the administration cost of
$1,824.
In the future we
will be receiving $9,122
from the State of
•
Minnesota (their share
in the grant). This may take some time as
the money has yet
to be received for the 1992
grant match.
Part of the Federal
monies are for the purpose
of construction of
a berm surrounding
Veterans Memorial Field.
•
City Hall
Parks & Recreation
Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West
900 Harrington Street
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper-
•
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
149;°C' 7. '91 3
Iwo Swum SL
_ -w 7 'ZI
6%%- .e
SEPIS9,3
�O
C
July 2, 1993
Mr. Wally Tischer
Tischer Construction
P.O. Box 816
115 -3rd Avenue W.
Alexandria, MN 56308
RE: Drainage at 820 South Grade Road
Dear Mr. Tischer:
I have again received concern regarding the westerly side yard drainage at 820
South Grade Road. Apparently, after the recent heavy rains, the water was
ponding between the homes creating potential for wet basements.
In an effort to resolve this matter I am requesting that you provide as -built
elevations verifying that storm water does indeed drain within the drainage
easement over the curb.
I would appreciate this document by July 15, 1993•
Best regards,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1
1 �!
e
James G. MarW!
Building Official
JGM/mms
cc: Mark Hensen, Building Inspector
John Rodeberg, City Engineer
Ms. Lucille Dufresne, 1000 Sunset Street
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- printrd on mcwde-d parer-
Police Deyartment
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
0
0 C
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 23, 1993
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official
RE: Brief Summary of I.C.B.O. Conference
FOR YOUR INFORMATIOR
Please accept my appreciation for your supporting me to attend the 71st
I.C.B.O. Annual Business Meeting /Code Change Process in Sacramento,
California.
The conference was very educational and informative.
• The education program consisted of case law history on "Right of Entry ".
Also, an enforcement grading system was presented which is being developed by
the (3) model codes and the insurance industry as an underwriting tool.
This is proposed to be very similar to fire department ratings.
The code change process was very complicated and at times tedious. However,
it provided excellent insight to the "Intent" of the code and the complexity
of changing or amending code language. Industry is very involved with this
process.
Networking, communication, socialization by code officials is also an
enlightening experience. For example, I met the building officials from Los
Angeles and San Francisco. Hutchinson's problems seemed very minimal to me
after those conversations. I realized how thankful we are to have a proactive
and nonviolent community.
Again, a special thanks for your support)
JGM /mms
cc: Marilyn J. Swanson - Council Packet F.Y.I.
City Hall Parks fr Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed an mcuded paper -
International Conference of Building Officials
5360 WORKMAN MILL ROAD • WHITTIER, CALIFORNIA 90601 -2298 • (310) 699 -05410
FIRST VICE CHAIRMAN
August 27, 1993
BOB CTOR FOWLER.
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING K C.B.O.
OF BR,RE, AK 4.9.0.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A&LENE. TEXAS
SECOND
OFFICE OF
CHAIRMAN
Code Enforcement Grading System (LEGS). The purpose of the
PRESIDEW
grading system is to reflect the value of effective code enforcement in
PAST CHAIRMAN
JON S. TRAW, BE
C.B.O.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
DIREY.NERRBIARTM
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
SPOKANE. WASHINGTON
Your participation is needed to make this grading system meaningful.
BUILDING NEVADA
Dear ICBO class A Member:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
FIRST VICE CHAIRMAN
The attached sheet contains the four main areas of the CEGS and a
BOB CTOR FOWLER.
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING K C.B.O.
OF BR,RE, AK 4.9.0.
The three model code organizations have joined with the National
A&LENE. TEXAS
SECOND
Committee on Property Insurance (NCPI) to pursue development of a
VICE - CHAIRMAN
JAN P. GASTERLAND, C.B.D.
BUILDING
Code Enforcement Grading System (LEGS). The purpose of the
CODE OFFICER
ST PAUL. MINNESOTA
grading system is to reflect the value of effective code enforcement in
PAST CHAIRMAN
the insurance rate structure of speck communities.
JAMES W
DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
Please review the various topics and the preliminary percentages given
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
SPOKANE. WASHINGTON
Your participation is needed to make this grading system meaningful.
RON BULLOCK, C.B.D.
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
The purpose of the CEGS is to encourage communities ) through
SANDY UTAH
favorable insurance underwriting considerations, to undertake and
TWUL T EDGERTON
MANAGER, BUILDING AND CODE
reinforce code enforcement activities.
ENFORCEMENT
Thank you for your help. Should you have any questions, please
VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON
contact Doug Thornburg Vice- President/Education (ext. 226) or Tom
I
ROBERT J, EPPSTEINI
The attached sheet contains the four main areas of the CEGS and a
DIRECTOR. BUILDING AND SAFETY
FREMONT, CALIFORNIA
brief explanation of what is included in each area. Preliminary
.
KENNETH G. LARSEN 119.0.
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING AND HOUSING
weighting values have been assigned by the NCPI Building Code
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA
Subcommittee.
L.B.O.
OORTM)BUI
BUILD FFICP.E..
OFFICIAL
BA
=7
DANA POINT. CALIFORNIA
ALAN P OLSON, RI, C.B.O.
Please review the various topics and the preliminary percentages given
ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DIRECTOR
PHOENIX. ARIZONA
to them. Then assign your own evaluation of what these percentages
RON KWEREWKZ C.B.O.
should be, and return the sheet in the self - addressed envelope.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
` H D
PORT ORCHARD. WASHINGTON
Thank you for your help. Should you have any questions, please
LUM FBUILDDGSASE
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING SAFETY
contact Doug Thornburg Vice- President/Education (ext. 226) or Tom
I
GLENDALE. ARIZONA
Campbell, Education Programs Manager (ext. 227).
THOMAS R. TNOYPSOK C.B.O.
7998 Georgetown Road, Suite 900 • Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 • (317) 879 -1677
BUILDING OFFICIAL
MNM
SROCMFIELD. COLORADO
ZION K. WATTS, C.B.O.
Sincerely,
CHIEF OF BUILDING INSPECTIONS
(51 z) 343 -9111
BUILDING SAFETY DIVISION
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA
9300 Jollyville Road, Suite 101 •Austin, Texas 78759 -7455 • (512) 7948700
ROBERT D. WEBER. P.E., C.B.O.
f -^
DIRECTOR. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING
COUNTY OF CLARK
AS VEGAS, NEVADA
on S. Traw, P.E.
ALLEN D. ZEPNDL C.B.a
BUILDING OFFICIAL
President
STRLWATER, MINNESOTA
7STnb
Enclosures
FAX NUMBERS
OrEW DMo&nNInl
(310) 692 -3653
Plan Re 0.
(310) 6923425
CBO ES, Inc.
M1.idlnmoN
(31 O) 695.4694
(310) 6994af1
Regional Offices: 6130 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 120 • Pleasanton, California 94588 • (510) 734 -3080
NPnNWn CaslOrrie
(510) 4634295
7998 Georgetown Road, Suite 900 • Indianapolis, Indiana 46268 • (317) 879 -1677
MNM
(317) 741.9475
(516) 741,9115
6738 N.W. Tower Drive • Kansas City, issouri 64151 • 816) 741 -2241
tY•
TO.Wlri
Ta:as
(51 z) 343 -9111
9300 Jollyville Road, Suite 101 •Austin, Texas 78759 -7455 • (512) 7948700
wasn,rigi .
(206) 637 -6939
2122 -112th Avenue, N.E., Suite B -300 • Bellevue, Washington 98004 • (206) 451 -9541
L
A
D
M
I
N
O 3
F c
C %
O
D
E
S
r�
J
L
A
N 2
5
R %
E
V
I
N
S
P 2
E 5
C %
T
E
1
5
CODE ENFORCEMENT Gf�ADING SYSTEM
1. Adoption of model building codes and modification of codes through local ordinance.
2. Training in code understanding and code enforcement.
3. Certification of code enforcers.
4. Building Official's qualifications /experienceJeducation
5. Number of professionals on staff.
6. Issue date of adopted codes.
7. Zoning provisions that speak to local natural hazards.
8. Contractor/builder licensing and bonding.
9. Building 3epar e.^.t iac=tiv- fo- c^_timuing education, outside treinin0, certification and certification
maintenance.
10. Selection procedures for Building Official
11. Public awareness program for natural hazard mitigation.
12. Education (sernmars/classes) of elected officials relating to code enforcement.
13. Participation in code development activities.
14. Presence of administrative policy "and procedures including appeal process.
15. Staffing of plan reviewers relative to workload.
16. Plan reviewer's certifications/ qualifications /experience/education.
17. Level of detail of plan review.
18. Use of plan review checklist.
19. Requirement for plans for one and two family dwellings.
20. Performance evaluations for plan reviewers for quality assurance.
21 . Department policy to report designer licensing violations to appropriate state professional licensing board.
22. Staffing of inspectors relative to workload.
23. Inspector s certincatioavquaiificat )uniewyerienceIcz a cn.
24. Authority to, and history of, issuance of correction notices and stop wont orders.
25. Policy of final inspections performed after the building is complete and prior to occupancy.
26. Use of continuous on -site (special) inspections for specific structural elements.
27. Certification of occupancy issued prior to occupancy.
28. Use of checklist for on -site, multi - discipline inspections.
29. Special inspections for natural hazard mitigation.
30. Performance evaluations for inspectors for quality assurance.
31. Mandatory structural retrofit program to mitigate natural hazards.
32. Existing building inspection program.
33. Presence of separate codes for existing buildings.
4PREF.
..uvnr
10.0°/1
9.00/4
4.0%
3.5%
2.0%
1.00/4
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
10.00%
5.0%
4.5%
2.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.5%
10.0%
5.0%
2.00/4
2.00/4
1.5%
1.5%
10a%
1.0%
1.0"%
10.0%
2.3%
2.5%
Total - 100.0°%
4PREF. WEIGHT (PREFERRED WEIGHT) my ben indication of F (for greater), . (for less), black (all right as dated) or a value.
Dear Code Official,
A Code Enforcement Grading System is under development by the combined efforts of the three model building code
organizations (BOCA, ICBO, and SBCCI) and the insurance industry. Once completed, this grading system will tvainwIft
community's building code enforcement (especially as it relates to natural hazards subject to the graded area) and may
become an underwriting tool for the insurance industry. Your input into this wont is an important link to the evolution of
the grading system.
The background information requested on this page will help our committee make certain decisions critical to relativity
formulas. Knowing the population, size of jurisdiction, total fair market value, number of permits issued and inspections
completed helps us to draw relationships in items such as number of personnel on staff versus the number needed.
The "SUBJECT WEIGHTING" found on the reverse of this page is a summary of the subject matter found in the Code
Enforcement Grading System and the committee's preliminary thoughts on the weight (in percentage) each subject should
carry in relationship to the overall grade (100 %). You will see that the grading system is divided into four general topics-
Administration of Codes (351K), Plan Review (25 °/9), Inspection (250K), and Existing Buildings (151/9). The far right column
is reserved for your input of weights you feel appropriate to the individual subject matters.
We appreciate your valuable time taken to complete this aliestimnaim Men- r'nn,. ymn respo2a in the enclo ed
envelope by SEPTEMBER 30, 1993 so that we may include it in our next committee meeting.
State
Number of Supervisors Number of Plan Reviewers Number of Inspectors
(/Vote: The summation of the above must equal the total enforcement start)
How many positions (Plan Reviewers or Inspectors) or fraction thereof are filled by outside contractors? .
Size of jurisdiction in square miles
Population served by the building department
How many plan reviews were performed for the most recent recorded 12 month period?
How many permits that require inspection were issued for the most recent recorded 12 month period? _
How many inspections were conducted (all types) for the most recent recorded 12 month period?
What percent of the inspection time Is ran- oonstrudion related (such as zoning, nuisance, eta)? __96
Indicate the percentage of star( time devoted to training activities for the most recent recorded 12 mordh
period %
Comments:
DAVID B. eNxaLD1
GARY D. McDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON•
STEVEN S. HOOF
LAURA E. FRETLAND
DAVIII X. BRUEDOEMAN}I
PAUL D. DOVE • -
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENTI
RICHARD O. XCOEE
CATHRYN D. REHER
OMA M. BRANDT
BRETT D. ARNOLD
1 ALSO ADMITTED IN TL AND NEw TON.
I ALSO AD NI7TED IN MSWNSLY
September 9, 1993
ARN-OLD & MCDON ELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAiv
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MIA'NEA.POLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492
16121 545-9000
MN TOLL TREE BOO -O -4546
PAX 16121 645 -1190
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Cable Franchise Renewal Prccess
Our File No. 3244 -92054
Dear Gary:
D CODNSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. LALL[ER
501 SODTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55071
`6121 389-2214
TAIL `6121 059 -6506
101 PARR PLACE
RIITCHINSON, MINNESOTA 66050
16121 681 -1676
TAX 16121 587 -4095
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
yeti , - <-0
SEP 19'93
RECEIVED
8Y_.�
Enclosed herewith please find FCC Form No. 328 entitled
"Certification of Franchising Authority to Regulate Basic Cable
Service Rates and Initial Finding of Lack of Effective
Competition ". At my direction and pursuant to the authority
granted by the Hutchinson City Council, this form has been filed by
Thomas Creighton who represents the City of Hutchinson with respect
to these cable matters.
I will be preparing a more formal report on the status of the
negotiation process in the course of the next several days. I
would appreciate it if you would include this correspondence and
the enclosed certificate as "for your information items" for
consideration by the council.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL -
G. Barry Anderson
• GBA /pb
Enclosure
FOUND LOOSE
IN THE MAILS AT
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
reeear Caow-oke". C w aeseasss
trw.sr.. a e aessa ea.:. mrauye
' FCC 328 For FCC Use Only
CERTIFICATION OF FRANCHISING AUTHORITY TO REGULATE BASIC CABLE SERVICE RATES
AND INITIAL FINDING OF LACK OF EFFECTIVE COMPETITION
Name of Franchising AuthoritC
Cit of Hutchinson
Mailing Address ..... __ .. .... __ ...
37 �Idqhingfnn Aypnile west
Cliutchinson
State
Telephone No. (include area code).
(612) 587 -5151
Person to contact with respect to this form;
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
2, a. Name (s) and address(es) of cable system) and associated FCC community
unit identifiers within your jurisdiction_ (Attach additional sheen if necessary3
Cab) em'e n erme is company
9%1/a �ie dwest Cablevision
Mailing Address
103 East Second Street
Gh
Redwood Falls J.MN
State
I ZIP Code
156283
Cable System's FCC Community Unit Identifier. MN 0 0 7 8
Cable System's Name
'ling Address
�y State ZIP Code
Cable System's FCC Community Unit Ide ntt6er:
2. b. Name (s) of system(s) and associated community unit identifier(s) you
claim are subject to regulation and with respect to which you are fir g this
certification. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
NameofSystemCity Of Community UnG
HutoevisoonOidwest Ida. fiery
Name of System Community Unit
Wenbfir
L a Have you served a copy of this form on an parties ❑ Ye pNo
rated in Zb.r
3. Will your banehesng authority adopt �Yn ❑the
(within 120 days of certification) and
administer regulation with respect to
basic cable service that are consis tent
with the regutations adopted by the FCC
pursuant to 47 V.S.C. Section S430a1?
4. With respect to the franchising authority's regulations referred
to in Question 3,
aYn Elmo
a. Don your fnnchsirg authority lave
the legal authority to adopt them?
b. Do yo franchsi g authority have Q
Does ur Yn ❑the
the personnel to administer them)
(Effective compattion meals that W fever than 30 prevrt of the
bou mWds in the franchise area subsv3e to the cable service of a
Cable system; th) the franchise area is (D served by at least two
unaffifiated multichannel video programming distributors each of
which offers comparable video programming to at least S0 peenst
of the households in the franchise area; and Col the mnbr of
households absa3ing to programming services offered by
multichannel video programming distributors other than the largest
m ll6chan aW video programming distributor exceeds IS percent of
the hoselwlds in the franchise are; or (ri a ned6c annel video
programming distributor operated by the franchising authority for
?hut franchise area offers video progranuairg to at ken SO,
of the households in flat franchise area)
Sign
Title
Legal Counsel
D°er 9/2/93
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE
PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. CODE
TITLE 14SECTION 1001).
• Return the oiginel and one copy of this certification form (s
Indicated in Instructional, along with any aCachments, toc
Federal Comm miau6no Commission
AILS: Cable Frandmisa g Authority Certification
P.O. Box 19539
Washington, D. G 20036
FCC Yoe
aasue muss
�Yn ONO
3. Do the procedural laves and regulatiorm
applicable to rate regulation proceedugs
by Your franchising authority Provide a
reasonable opportunity for consideration
of the views of interested partfesi
Yn ❑the
X
6. The Commission presumes that the cable
systems) fated in 2.b. is (are) not subject
to effective =npetitton. Based on the
definition below, do you have reason to
believe that this prewnption is correct?
(Effective compattion meals that W fever than 30 prevrt of the
bou mWds in the franchise area subsv3e to the cable service of a
Cable system; th) the franchise area is (D served by at least two
unaffifiated multichannel video programming distributors each of
which offers comparable video programming to at least S0 peenst
of the households in the franchise area; and Col the mnbr of
households absa3ing to programming services offered by
multichannel video programming distributors other than the largest
m ll6chan aW video programming distributor exceeds IS percent of
the hoselwlds in the franchise are; or (ri a ned6c annel video
programming distributor operated by the franchising authority for
?hut franchise area offers video progranuairg to at ken SO,
of the households in flat franchise area)
Sign
Title
Legal Counsel
D°er 9/2/93
WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ARE
PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. CODE
TITLE 14SECTION 1001).
• Return the oiginel and one copy of this certification form (s
Indicated in Instructional, along with any aCachments, toc
Federal Comm miau6no Commission
AILS: Cable Frandmisa g Authority Certification
P.O. Box 19539
Washington, D. G 20036
FCC Yoe
aasue muss
Meer
wwr.p,k O.C. 10l54 Aft9w.er w cis
70500330
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC 328 111110iiii'll 0M V%
FRANCHISING AUTHORITY CERTIFirATION
The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Complti(ion Act,
enacted in October x992, changes the manner it Khich able
television systems that are not subject to effective competition am
regulated. In general, rafts for the bw c service ri.r (rte tie wired
as A condition of access to all other video services and containing,
among other services, local broadcast station signals ad public,
educational, and public access channels) and associated equipment
will be subject to regulation by loaf or sax governments
('franchising authorities). Rates for cable programming services and
associated equipment (all services except basic and pay channels) will
be subject to regulation by the FCC Rams for pay channels
(channels for which them is a specific perthannel or perprognm
chawi ax not regulated
2. Only cable systems that are not subject to etffemve competition may
be regulated Effective competition means that (a) fewer than 30
percent of the households in the franchise area subscribe to the cable
service of a able system; (b) the franchise area is (i) served by at least
two unaeiiiated muitichannei vhdca programming distributors each of
which offers comparable video programming to at least 50 percent of
the households in the franchise area; and Gar the number of
households subscribing to programming services offered by
multichannel video programming distributors other than the largest
multichannel video programming distributor exceeds IS percent of
the households in the franchise area; or (d a multichannel video
programming distributor operated by the franchising authority for that
franchise area offers video programming to x least SO percent of the
households in that franchise area.
3. in order to regulate basic service tier rates, a franchising a�uiibriry
must be cerrified by the FCC In order to be Cod , a franchising
authority must complete this form. An original and one copy of the
compieted form and aft attachments must be recstned t FCC
by re3istered mail, reran receipt requested to the lac the
address on the form. 3
a. A copy`of the form must be served on the cable operator by first-class
mail on or before the date the form is sent or delivered to the FCC
5. The franchising authority's certification will became effective 30 days after thte dare ...red nn the nesral .m n!eeimt unless otherwise
notified by the Commission by that date. The franchising authorry
cannot begin to regulate rates, however, until it has aauuly, adopted
the required regulations bee below) dad =6I it has notified the able
operator that It has been cartified and that it has adopted the required
reguladora. ..
6. In order to be certified, franchising authorities must answer -yes- to
Questions 3. a, and S. which are explained as kAlows:
7. Question 3: The franchising authority must adopt ram regulations
consistent with the Commission's mpWon for basic able sevfoe
To fulfill this requirement for certifiadw, the liandnising AUUWM
MAY simply adopt a regulation indicamtg the it will follow the
reguiaions established by the KC
The franchising authority has 120 days to adopt these regulations
after the time it is certified. The franchising auhority may nor.
however, begin to regulate cable ran until alter it has adopted these
regulations and carol it has notified the cable operator that R has been
certified and has adopted the required regulations. ..
Question a(b): The Gnchising authority must have a sufficient•
number of personnel to undertake rate regulation.
' A fmchise authority unable to aitwer yn'to questions aW or a(b)
may wish to review the FCCS Heron and Order in nacket 97.76A
FCC 93-177 (released may 3, 1993) for futsher information on the
daMlsMwtt of alternative federal regulatory procedures
9. Question S: Franchising authorities must have procedural regulations
allowing for public participation in rate regulation proeeedngs. g a
ftwC hising authority does not have these regulations already in plate,
k must adopt them within 120 days of certification and before it may
undertake ram regulation,
10. Question 6: Most able systems are Oat subject to effective
competition, as defined by the Cable A¢ (The definition is included
above and on the form.) The franchising authority rney af7W= that
the aaie system in its jurisdiction is not subject to effective
competition.
For Purposes of applying the definition of effective competftiorh bee
kem 2 above), •multidannef video programming distributor( Induce
a Cable operator, a multichannel muldpoire dimibuton service, a
direa Moadcau sueTite service, a Meviiiion xxive•my satellite
Program distributor, a video dialtone service and a satellite master
antenna television symlm. A mufticwnneh video programming
distributor's senior wiii be deemed - offeted' when they are bah
technically and actually available. Sservice is - technically available-
when the mmlticwvnel drmibutor is physically able to deliver the
service to a household wishing to subscrrbe, with only minimal
additional irtvesbnemt by the distributor. A service is 'saualy
available' it subscribers in the franchise area are reasonably swam
through marketing efforts That the service is available. Subscrlbenhfp
Of those multichannel video Programming distributon offering service
to at least 50 pereem of the households in a franchise area will be
aggregated to determine whether, at keg IS pemant of the
households in the franchise area ales served by compeitwL A
multichannel video pcognmuning distributor must otter at feast 12
channels of programming, at least one channel of which b
nonbraadast, to be found to offer *Comparable' video programming.
11. This cardfiocon form must be signed by a government official with
audhoiey to as on behalf of the franchising authority.
tee MOT1Q TO ttorwOUAU taautean By raw MVAO' ACT AND "W rATesw
ttsaucrtom Aa
The Idfineon d ewrrt bdonrs w chi bmt b adrnad br M Cowenoese Act It
tl7A, a arwfoL 1ti Corr.�iah r.i r dun i+lereradn orwrdrl w dd1 Me a dolrmw
e dw behor aWWW dxxdd tW &*rued to mpr+ able mid In MMO1t dre
daermeroar. v tr W Nowarw pwemet It M Mhrnrr rrcm7 b ado gnarl
bwronoammYrdIaeirbmnerdhaee .errwrm aenhq. Nirlarmarianpwhdadwdhi
ftne we be am4Ma for WON, baparaA yte mgare a OWAMd b cab We Y MW.MW
edrF.
Nwk mmrwa Merin tr dun comicun of bdahhrN is sbnwd b awes" 30 .6WM
bch Mm dr iw, tr m..wa � "d 1e resrn9 data weaa prams and
mananra"rm acrd, em rahrene and M-a-M dr arlaarn of inil r scam
tarmhmm r<rd:ha wo Munn ernr a+w car aspea of on alwbr a:darhhhetr%
hdWMrait Div a 404"Mm Weser.ee0Fed W554,emav o Oaks c�ttamd•
aid Bud e. us Mauston , wtnneah. 0. $ 3073x. end e b Ono d Aterpeae
aid eWat he.ern saMah weir r3osonssq, waNweaa 0. G 10301.
TM FOtW"4 NOTICE 6 tIOURM !T Tut MMACT ACT OF 1974 Tl 93-57%
f). Question aW: The franchising authority's'tegal authority- to regulate titDues 31. ISM 5 uaC smNlm ANC TM rA/BWOQ a6X Cr7OM ACT OF near
basic service must come from sate law. In Tar+nr. yarea nnH ties PA. 96-511.OfCPAM 11. 19441, M ri a r 3547.
Sax. rmvemmenr may rem.lare tiles rates In those soon, the stain - - - •
government should file this caetificsoon. Provision in fta d is* -
_ agreements That prohibit rue regulation are yajd, and do not prevent
A franchising authority from regulating the basic service tier and
Associated equipment
•
8/30/93 HUTCHINSON UTOES COMMISSION
PAGE 1
BALANCE SHEET
JULY 31, 1993
(�
--- -- -
c_
To
--__._ _ —_._�. - .--- --
ww r w TOTAL
I�
ASSETS
UTILZTV PLANT AT COST-- ----- '- __._— �. —__�—
�
�•jr
_
LAND 6 LAND RIGHTS
790,112.25
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT
27,349,239.74
_
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT -.._.. . -._ -. _._ -_.. --- -- -- -- - - ---- - -
-- - -. _.__.._....- 28.134.351.94-- ..— _.-- - - - -..
LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(13,164,333.99)
-,1
TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION.
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
17,402,266.87
- . ------ --
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESf
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
30,377,082.87
RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
FUTURE EXPANSION 6 DEVELOPMENT
_.� —_—
_...._.INVESTMENT = GAB RESERVES- --__`_��—_-._.
_3,102,987.75
1,153,836.31 - --- '—
MEDICAL INSURANCE
100,000.00
ESCROW ACCOUNT 1986 BONDS
1,743,879.10
ri
- --
-BOND 8 INTEREST PAYMENT 1993—
54,553.28 - --
__
BOND RESERVE - 1993
1,389,320.00
=,{�
CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND
750,000.00
_
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS T ACCOUNTS- - - - " -- -
- 8,294,576.
CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
- i
-
CASH- IN BANK �- -- - -- ----- `-- - ---
5,239, 778.08
_
INVESTMENTS 6 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
85,856.54
_
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1,475,044.36
_
-- INVENTORIES- -- ---- - -`—
-- 545,847.i3 ` -- --_-
PREPAID INSURANCE
73,623.32
•[
TREASURY BILL DISCOUNT_
26,418.93
FERC FILING DEPOSITS
30, 000.00---- ---- _ -' - -�
-
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
7,476,568.36
=:(
- . —_ - -.
DEFERRED CHARGE
_
BOND DISCOUNT 1986
35,985.89
CLEARING ACCOUNT
136.60
- - -._
—TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE_- __— __— ____. -__
- --
° --
TOTgL ASSETS �����
46,184,3541,16
`C
r
r
r-
8/30/93 HUTCHINSON *TIES COMMISSION PAGE 2 •
BALANCE SHEET
JULY 31, 1993
MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES
�_ -- - MUNICIPAL EQUITY
MUNICIPAL EQUITY 27,138,781.38
UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS 1,106,733.66
--- - -' CONTRIBUTION TO - -` -- - (425,006.805
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY 27,820,515.04
LONG TERM LIABILITIES -NET OP
CURRENT MATURITIES
_ 1986 BONDS 1,670,000.00
1993 BOND 6.0751000.06
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES 15,745,000.00
CONSTR CONTRACTS 8 ACCTS PAY R
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 6 ACCTS PAY
>,
I
'
CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIEW
- -
O_.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
2.238,184.68
ACCRUED
67,219.84
_INTEREST
ACCRUED PAYROLL
34,773.18
0 :
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
131,259.30
ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND
28,077.72
__
-- CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
_
87,188.00 _
0
OTHER CURRENT 8 ACCRUED LIABILITIES -
32,132.32 -
a-
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIAR
2,618,835.12
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY b LIAB
46,184,330.16
O
r
L _-
L
L
L
r
• B/3U/93
HUTCHINSON UT
IES COMMISSION
PAGE i
HUTCHINSIOMINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF
INCOME 6 EXPENSES
JULY 31, 1993
PREVIOUS --
CURRENT
BUDGETED
BUDGET
ANNUAL'--
- -�
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
DEVIATION
BUDGET
!(
INCOME STATEMENT
+(
OPERATING REVENUE
___ ___
SALES = ELECTRIC ENERGY---- -�
— 5,523,816.25
5.774,447.66—'-- . -
5,609,830.00 ___
_ _ 164,617.66--9.709,00o.001
SALES FOR RESALE
270.00
540.00
1,000.00
(460.00)
2,000.00
;:i(
NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES
40,944.31
40,471.57
22,742.00
17,729.57
39000.00
SECURITY LIGHTS -- ----- - --
- -- _- 7,472.00-
7,230.00_.- - -
-_.. 8.260.00
- -__ (1,030.00) -_
-- _.14,,000.00
-LI
_ POLE RENTAL
1,564.50
1.564.50
1,880.00
(315.50)
4,000.00
SALES - GAS
2,415,066.24
3,207.304.95
2.395,100.00
812.204.95
4,650,000.00
is
-- -" _
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE�� -"
__
'- �7, 989,133.30
- 9,031.558.60 _
8,038,812.00
992,746.68-
14,418,000.00
—"i
OPERATING EXPENSES
___ ___
PRODUCTION OPERATION —��� � ��
___ ___
���.366,O50.U7
_
�417-369.91--465 .
, 025.50_'_____
_
47,633.59
787, 150.00
PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
241,158.19
331,888.53
306,953.00
(24,935.53)
391,600.00
a(
PURCHASED POWER
2,675,387.60
3,113.755.60
2,733.000.00
(380,755.60)
4,8.66,000.00
---TRANSMISSION OPERATION———
487.99--
-� - � 177.0 -C --
-�_ 774.00
- -_ --
--� 596.97
_
- 3,400.00
-.
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE
36,787.23
24,869.16
21,740.00
(3,129.16)
28,500.00
_ ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
___ 102.093.06
___ 116.927.02
106.926.20
(_10.000.82)
174,420.00
ELECTRIC- DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
83,943.571
68,412.31
03,365.00
54,932.69
509, 000.09
_Y_{.
MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION
974.01
1,031.69
1,110.00
78.31
2,500.00
{
-
GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
59.04_
2_,871.21
114.00
(2,757.21)
500.00
L')
_ _MFG
:_ - — PURCHASED - GASEXPENSE -
- 2,182,148,51 _
2,861,130.9'7 -2,!31,600.00
(729,530.97)
4,170, 000.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
111,954.14
- 121,300.88
110,735.60
(10,642.28)
190,980.00
d(
GAS DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
26,309.91
32,542.80
23,141.00
(9,401.80)
29,500.00
_
CUSTOMER EXPENSES
78,536.49
— 83,092.98
- 68,760.06
(14,332.98)
_ 116,500.00
_ _'
_ CUSTOMER SERVICES
11,776.31
17,373.34
11.890.00
(5,483.34)
20,500.00
ADMINISTRATIVE 8 GENERAL EXPENSES
657,364.85
687,768.44
692.916.00
5,147.56
1,099,050.00
_
`- DEPRECIATION _ - - --
434,000.00
_
459,669.00
- 436,080.00
(23,589.00)
__-
788, 000.00
1i
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
7,009,030.97
8,340,260.87
7,194,133.30
(1,146,127.57)
12.777,600.00
;: +(
- - ---- -
OPERATING INCOME J
� 980,102.33
691,297.81
- 844,678.70
(133,380.89)�
1,640,400.00
•_i
- OTHER INC_ OME
OTHER - NET -
30,333.57
13,731.97
20,740.00
(6,988.03)
55,000.00
...
_ INTEREST INCOME
354,770.63
232,043.42
362,637.50
(130,594.08)
541,250.00
MISC INCOME _
(16,302.16)
15,674.55
_(91.405.00)
107,079.55
50,500.00
_'
MISC INCOME - GA8
266,777.83
271,504.04
244.960.25
26,543.79
569,675.00
F1
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
635,579.67
532,973.98
536.932.75
(3,958.77)
1.216,425.00
r:l(
OTHER EXPENSES————
- MISC EXPENSES
21.563.78
11,900.49
7.950.00
(3,950.40)
30,000.00
; -.j(
_ INTEREST EXPENSE
63,662.69.-1-1105,637.73,
49.683.13
(55,954.60)
91,037.50
___ _
-- TOTAL OTHER"EXPENSES'
___
� -� 85,226.47
117, 338.13
37.633.13
_
(59,905.00)
121,037.50
NON - OPERATING INCOME
550,353.40
415,433.83
479,299.62
(63,563.77)
1.095,387.50
NET INCOME
1,530,455.73
1,106,733.66 1,323,978.32
(217,244.66) 2,735,787.50 -1(
r-I (