The URL can be used to link to this page

cp09-22-1992 cI IUTCHINSDk,l CITY CALENDAR WEEK OF September 2 0T O September 2 1992 SUNDAY -20- r V. -23- 10:00 A.M. - Directors Me at City Hall 6:00 P.M. - Tree Board Meet at Recreation Center THURSDAY - -24- MONDAY -21- FRIDAY -25- T AY AUTUMN BEGINS 0:00 A.M. - Open Landfill Proposals at City Hall 8:30 A.M. - 12:00 Noon - Directors' Long -Range Planning Meeting at Library Conference Room 5:30 P.M. - Special Joint Meeting of Council & County Commis- sioners at City Hall 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall SATURDAY -26- VACATION /CONFERENCE CHUCK NELSON - Sept. 21& 22 RANDY DEVRIES - Sept. 21 -23 STEVE MADSON - Sept. 25 - Oct. 3 0 JOINT SPECIAL MEETING • There will be a joint special meeting of the City Council and the McLeod County Board of Commissioners on Tuesday, September 22, 1992 at 5:30 P.M. in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the two proposed locations for the joint maintenance facility. Mayor /mjs 0 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Thor Skeie, Faith Lutheran Church 3. Consideration of Minutes Regular Meeting of September 8, 1992; Bid Openings of September 11, 1992 & September 14, 1992 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Financial Report - August 1992 2. Senior Advisory Board Minutes of September 10, 1992 • 3. Planning Commission Minutes of August 18, 1992 (b) Report of City Investments Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. None 6. Communications. Requests and Petitions (a) Discussion of Access to Coast to Coast Store Building Action - (b) Consideration of Request And Correspondence from MainStreet Association Regarding A Special Service District Action - (c) Consideration of Request from Crow River Arts Guild for Additional Allocations from City • Action - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 • 7. Resolutions and Ordinances (a) Ordinance No. 92 -67 - An Ordinance Of The City Of Hutchinson, Minnesota, Changing The Boundaries Of Election Precincts And Adopting By Reference City Code Chapter 1 And Section 2.99 Which, Among Other Things, Contain Penalty Provisions Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt (b) Resolution No. 9801 - Resolution For Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (c) Resolution No. 9802 - Resolution Changing Hutchinson Planning Commission Meeting Time Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (d) Resolution No. 9816 - Resolution Adopting Assessment • Rolls And Certifying Unpaid Bills Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (e) Resolution No. 9817 - A Resolution Amending Resolution No. 9593, Personnel Policy Dated November 12, 1991 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (f) Resolution No. 9815 - Resolution Adopting General Records Retention Schedule Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 8. Unfinished Business (a) Consideration of Dumpster Location for 101 Park Place (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 8, 1992) Action - • 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 (b) Consideration of Mac's Bluff Assessment Agreement with HRA /Gary Hasse (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 8, 1992) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement (c) Consideration of Health And Dental Insurance Renewals (DEFERRED SEPTEMBER 8, 1992) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (d) Consideration of New Petro Fund Reimbursement Application Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service (b) Consideration of Request By Aagard West Regarding Changes • In Designated Day for Refuse Pickup Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (c) Consideration of Interim Refuse Hauling Agreement for Month of October with Aagard West Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (d) Discussion of NPDES Permits At Airport, Street Garage And Wastewater Facility Action - (e) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll No. 278 And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 6, Project No. 92 -10 (Century Avenue) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9803 & No. 9804 \J 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 (f) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll No. 281 And Accepting Waiver of Hearings for Letting No. 13, Project No. 92 -19 (Hasse Hills First Addition) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and accept roll and waive hearings - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9805 & No. 9806 (g) Consideration of Adopting Assessment Roll No. 281 And Awarding Contract for Letting No. 13, Project No. 92 -19 (Hasse Hills First Addition) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt roll and award contract - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9807 & No. 9808 (h) Discussion of Airport Appraisal Action - (i) Discussion of Franklin Avenue Parking Requested By Hutchinson Telephone Company is Action - (j) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Manufacturing, with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9798 (k) Consideration of Vacation of Utility Easement In Casa Addition Requested By Barry Barton with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading and set second reading for October 13, 1992 (1) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Roger Stearns, Stearnswood, with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9799 0 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 11 (m) Consideration of Variance Requested By Peter Hoeger for Non - Conforming Driveway And Construction of Garage with Favorable /Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution (n) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Jeanette Harris to Move 1972 Mobile Home to McDonald's Trailer Court with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9800 (o) Consideration of Final Plat of Sioux Hills No. 2 Submitted By Skip Quade (Two Mile Radius - -Acoma Township) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection (p) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By Michael Rose • (Two Mile Radius - -Acoma Township) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection (q) Consideration of Preliminary Plat of Huebert's Subdivision Submitted By Dan Huebert (Two Mile Radius- - Acoma Township) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection (r) Consideration of Preliminary Plat of Huebert's Second Subdivision Submitted By Dan Huebert (Two Mile Radius- - Acoma Township) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection (s) Consideration of Annexation Proceedings Requested By Hutchinson Technology, Inc. with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and refer to Minnesota Municipal Board 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 • (t) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Feed Lot Requested By Kurt Reiner (Two Mile Radius - Hutchinson Township) with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with objection (u) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll No. 279, Waiving Hearing And Adopting Roll for Letting No. 9, Project No. 92 -14 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt roll and waive hearing - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9809, No. 9810 & No. 9811 (v) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll No. 280, Waiving Hearing And Adopting Roll for Letting No. 12, Project No. 92 -18 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt roll and waive hearing - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9812, No. 9813 & No. 9814 (w) Consideration of Sign Policy to Install "No Parking" • Signs Action- Motion to reject - Motion to approve (x) Consideration of Release of Collateral for Hutchinson Technology Bonds Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve release (y) Consideration of Contractual Agreement Between City of Hutchinson and Aagard West for Residential Refuse Service Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (z) Discussion of Building Code Regarding McLeod County Fairgrounds Building Action - 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator • 6 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - SEPTEMBER 22, 1992 11. Claims. Appropriations and Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds • 12. Adjournment • MINUTES • REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. 2. INVOCATION There was no pastor present for the invocation. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of August 25, 1992, bid openings of August 25, 1992 and August 28, 1992 were approved as distributed. 4. ROUTINE ITEMS (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS . 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - AUGUST 1992 2. POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 29 & AUGUST 5, 1992 3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF JULY 6, 1992 4. HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES OF JULY 14, 1992 5. PARKS & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF JULY 29, 1992 The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to order the report and minutes filed. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M. (a) LETTING NO. 3, PROJECT 92 -05 - ADAMS STREET (T.H. 22) AND FAIR AVENUE Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M. and read the Public Hearing Notice for Adams Street. Engineer Rodeberg reported there were some problems with the sanitary sewer and water lines under Adams Street. • They were old and needed to be replaced. A consultant was working on the project design; however, there were I CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 several issues that needed to be resolved. The City Engineer pointed out that the existing right -of -way with a narrow width, the numerous large trees directly behind the existing curb and gutter, and MN /DOT's request to construct center turn lanes made it impossible to include parking in the design without removing trees and pur- chasing additional right -of -way. The City would also need to acquire temporary easements for sidewalk con- struction and additional right -of -way at street inter- sections to meet MN /DOT design requirements. Also, MN /DOT can not pay for the cost of parking lanes. Therefore, it would increase the City's share of the project cost and result in higher assessment rates. These issues have delayed the project schedule to 1993, with bids to be taken this winter and construction to begin in spring 1993. Gwen Wichman, 537 Adams Street SE, asked where company would park their cars. She also inquired about the one - way alley on Jefferson and Adams and wondered if 3M had to use Adams. Otto Rettig, 516 Adams Street SE, stated he could look • out his window to the north and east, and he never saw any problem with turn lanes. There was no traffic build up and no need for left turn lanes on Fifth or Adams. Due to the construction work on Main Street, there was heavy traffic on Adams. Engineer Rodeberg stated the dilemma was to redo the street so that it met the needs of the people. The pur- pose of the hearing was to seek the residents' preference and to select the best benefit for everybody affected. An unidentified gentleman predicted the property value would go down and the cost would go up if there was no parking in front of the houses. The City Engineer responded there were alleys where peo- ple could park. He stated the travel downtown was con- centrated, and Adams was not a residential street. There needed to be a balance between parking and business loca- tions. Lucille Ulrich, 205 Adams Street SE, inquired what would occur on Second and Adams where trucks cannot make the curves. She asked about plans for pedestrian striping on 0 2 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 Fifth and Adams and stated it was dangerous to cross the street at this intersection. Some years ago she sub- mitted a petition to the State regarding the traffic situation, and they denied any action being merited. Engineer Rodeberg commented the City may need to purchase a small piece of property at Washington, Second, Fifth and Fair Avenues to round out the curve to make it easier for trucks to turn. He also stated installation of a stop- and -go light cost $80,000, but could not be install- ed without MN /DOT's permission, based on traffic warrants being met. The Manager of Minne -Mine Credit Union stated he relied heavily on back street parking. Another concern was the closed parking lot. Customers who come through the drive -in window area need to exit onto the street. He inquired about the construction plan. Don Martin, 725 Goebel Street, (owner of property at 336 Adams Street SE), asked what percent of the people along the proposed street had an alleyway where they could park. He was in favor of no parking and saving money. . The City Engineer responded the blocks north of Fifth Avenue were short, and there was parking space on side streets. Robert Gausman, 561 Adams Street SE, preferred that it go back to a city street with no turn lanes and no parking in order to save the trees. The City Engineer stated the turn lanes were based on traffic levels, and Adams Street would be a state aid highway after T.H. 22 was rerouted. The MN /DOT design guidelines would be about the same. Engineer Rodeberg commented he preferred to see some stop lights, but traf- fic warrants are not currently met. Mayor Ackland stated that a committee was working on a plan to by -pass Hwy. 22 south of town. It would be several years, however, before the proposal would be considered. Gwen Wichman questioned which way the decision would go if the proposal benefitted the businesses but the residents did not want it. She had heard that Adams and Jefferson might become one -way streets. 0 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 • Richard Larson, 640 Adams Street SE, commented he had a small business located on the end of Adams. He was concerned about the scrap iron lying at the end of the alley. Bernett Pierce, 216 Adams Street SE, stated she was in favor of no parking on Adams. Otto Rettig said he could not understand not being able to park in front of his house after living there 37 years. He did not have a driveway to pull into. He com- mented the block of Fifth and Fair would need special consideration because of the businesses located along the street. Mr. Rettig observed the trees located on the east side of the street were further back than the ones on the west side. Donna Brink, 231 Adams Street SE, asked if things changed from year to year since it appeared the plans were chang- ing. Mayor Ackland responded that it was the opinion of the present City Council that trees should be preserved when- ever possible. Dwayne Brink inquired if the turn lanes would increase the flow of traffic. He favored no parking and saving the trees. Engineer Rodeberg reported that safety was the main rea- son for the turn lanes. He stated another hearing would be held regarding this proposed project after the project was bid. James Muetzel, 607 Adams Street SE, commented he favored no parking. If other residents want parking, they can pay for it themselves. The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close the hearing at 8:55 P.M. 6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL BY MARION GRAHAM Councilman Erickson moved to approve, seconded by Coun- cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried. 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 F_ I L (b) UPDATE ON OLD WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Engineer Rodeberg reported on the proposed use for the old wastewater treatment facility. Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to wait until spring before taking any action. (c) DISCUSSION OF HUTCHINSON CITY HALL /MUNICIPAL CENTER REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Following discussion of the proposed plans, Councilman Erickson moved to approve the Request for Proposals for Architectural and Engineering Services Related to Con- struction of the Hutchinson City Hall /Municipal Center. Motion seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously car- ried. (d) DISCUSSION OF VACATED ALLEY BEHIND COAST TO COAST STORE Al Kramer, owner of the Coast to Coast Store, commented on delivery truck problems encountered with the vacation of the alley behind his business. He and Erickson's had discussed the issue, but no agreement had been reached. Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to place this item on the September 22 Council agenda. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION NO. 9790 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive read- ing and adopt. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 9791 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive read- ing and adopt. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 9795 - RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE FOR 1992 ADOPTED ASSESSMENT ROLLS The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive read- ing and adopt. 0 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 (d) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -66 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464, SECTIONS 6.07, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05 AND 8.12 The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive second reading and adopt. (e) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -67 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF ELECTION PRECINCTS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive first reading and set second reading for September 22, 1992. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING TIME, DATE, AND LOCATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON CITY'S 1993 BUDGET AND TAX LEVY Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to hold a public hearing on December 14, 1992, at 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Motion seconded by Coun- cilman Lenz and unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF CROSS EASEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN SHOPKO STORES, INC. AND CITY OF HUTCHINSON (PHASE I - HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT) (DEFERRED AUG. 25, 1992) Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to defer to the first October meeting. (c) CONSIDERATION OF SANITARY SEWER CLEANING AND FLUSHING CONTRACT WITH CITY OF LITCHFIELD Following discussion, Councilman Mlinar moved to approve entering into contract. Motion seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LETTING NO. 11, PROJECT NO. 92 -17 (CROW RIVER PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE) • 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 n u Following discussion, Councilman Erickson moved to approve awarding contract to Structural Specialties in the amount of $31,584.35 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9793. Motion seconded by Councilman Tor - gerson and unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LETTING NO. 14, PROJECT NO. 92 -20 (DOWNTOWN LIFE SAFETY IMPROVEMENT) Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to approve awarding contract to low bidder, Quade Electric, in the amount of $71,026.50 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9794. (f) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM FOR HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Following discussion, Councilman Mlinar moved to approve and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9792. Mo- tion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried. (g) CONSIDERATION OF FRANCHISE FOR 101 PARK PLACE DUMPSTER LOCATION • Following discussion, Councilman Mlinar moved to table to the next Council meeting. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried. (h) CONSIDERATION OF MN /DOT PROGRAM TO REALIGN T.H. 22 Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to approve and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9797. Motion seconded by Councilman Erickson and unani- mously carried. (i) CONSIDERATION OF PLAZA HEIGHTS ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH FRANK FAY /NORWEST BANK Engineer Rodeberg reported on the two Agreement of Assessment Annulment And Waiver of Irregularity And Appeal of Reassessment for the two sets of property owned by Norwest Bank Minnesota. Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to approve and enter into assessment agreement for PID No. 12- 116 -30 -02 -0040 (19 acre parcel). Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried. The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by • 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 • Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and enter into assessment agreement for PID No. 12- 116 -30 -02 (22 platted lots in Plaza Heights). (j) CONSIDERATION OF MAC'S BLUFF ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH GARY HASSE It was reported that Fahey Sales Agency, Inc. had offered to pay for the installation of a sidewalk on city prop- erty along the south edge of Girl Scout Park which was adjacent to its parking lot. Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to ap- prove, contingent that Fahey Sales Agency would maintain the sidewalk located on city property. Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried. (n) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING PRELIMINARY 1993 TAX LEVY Following discussion, Councilman Erickson moved to ap- prove an additional $40,000 for the general fund and to 8 The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar to defer to Sep- tember 22 Council meeting. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried. (k) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICIES Following discussion, Councilman Mlinar moved to approve the revised policies. Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried. (1) CONSIDERATION OF HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE RENEWALS Agent Dennis Potter and Consultant Mark Flaten presented the proposed changes for health and dental insurance. Councilman Torgerson moved to approve the renewal rates effective January 1, 1993. Motion seconded by Councilman • Mlinar. After discussion, Councilman Torgerson withdrew his motion, and Councilman Mlinar withdrew his second. The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar to hold a City Employee Committee meeting to review the changes before a decision was made on insurance renewals. Motion sec- onded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried. (m) CONSIDERATION OF SIDEWALK ON CITY PROPERTY ALONG SOUTH EDGE OF GIRL SCOUT PARK It was reported that Fahey Sales Agency, Inc. had offered to pay for the installation of a sidewalk on city prop- erty along the south edge of Girl Scout Park which was adjacent to its parking lot. Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to ap- prove, contingent that Fahey Sales Agency would maintain the sidewalk located on city property. Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried. (n) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING PRELIMINARY 1993 TAX LEVY Following discussion, Councilman Erickson moved to ap- prove an additional $40,000 for the general fund and to 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 • waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9796 setting the preliminary 1993 tax levy at $3,201,407. Motion seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (o) CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT FOR BUILDING, RELOCATION AND OTHER EXPENSES FOR SIMONSON'S LUMBER OPTION, PHASE II During discussion, it was recommended the Acquisition Committee meet to review the issue and request Attorney Ronald McGraw to report on the relocation costs. The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar to defer, sec- onded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Plotz reported on the blueprints for the new liquor store and the selection of interior colors. A meeting will be held tomorrow with Witte Sanitation and Aagard West to negotiate for interim refuse hauling dur- ing the month of October. The McLeod County Emergency Services Director informed the City Administrator that the City of Hutchinson would receive $30,000 from federal funding for the recent storm cleanup. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN JOHN MLINAR Councilman Mlinar recommended a Resolution of Commenda- tion be presented to the Police Department and Fire Department for their superb handling of the hostage situ- ation last Friday. The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to adopt a Resolution. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN MARLIN TORGERSON Councilman Torgerson stated several people had requested lighting along the Luce Line walking trail since it was dark along the river and in the wooded area. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN DON ERICKSON • D • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 Councilman Erickson expressed concern regarding traffic control on Main Street for the Arts and Crafts Festival. The City Administrator will discuss with the Police Chief having the area patrolled. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Director Rodeberg reported the street lights along Main Street would be painted the latter part of the month. He also stated there was a new state mandate which would in- crease the city budget by $5- 6,000. 11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at • 10:15 P.M. 10 • MINUTES BID OPENING FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1992 City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at 10:00 A.M. Also present were Assistant Engineer Cal Rice and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. Administrator Plotz read Publication No. 4429, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 6, Project No. 92 -10. The following bids were opened and read: Juul Contracting Co. Hutchinson, MN $324,727.80 Duininck Brothers, Inc. Prinsburg, MN 343,974.00 The bids were referred to the Engineering Department for review and a recommendation. • The meeting adjourned at 10:02 A.M. E J • MINUTES BID OPENING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 Engineer John Rodeberg called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.M. Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. Engineer Rodeberg dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 4431, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 13, Project No. 92 -19. The following bids were opened and read: Juul Contracting Co. Hutchinson, MN $146,641.92 Duininck Brothers, Inc. Prinsburg, MN 173,479.00 RP Utilities Annandale, MN 158,413.10 • The bids were referred to the Engineering Department for review and a recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 2:05 P.M. 11 11 • Senior Advisory Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Present: Millie Jensen, Celia Ziemer, Arne Heil, Loretta Pishney, Ruby Krueger, Lloyd Mueller, ex- officio: Arnold Rotzien , staff Barb Haugen & Ruby Hanner Chairperson Mildred Jensen called the meeting to order at 10:00 am . A report on the Building Fund as well as the Board's account was given by A. Rotzien. The Board decided unanimously that the 2nd banner to be placed out by the entrance wear the City Logo identifying the Senior Center. An update on the Concession Volunteers was given - scheduling is going smoothly, however, there are more closed dates due to the inclement weather. Since the weekl band concert was held indoors, the pie & ice cream social fund- raiser didn't do as well as expected. There was a good turnout of volunteers and response was good for pie donations. It was reported that the card recyling project was going very well; the Conference Room was no longer available to outside groups on a rental basis • since the card project took up space and a lot of the supplies were handier left out in the room. This would not pose a problem for potential renters since they could use the Lounge instead. Board members Ruby Krueger, Nfldred Jensen and Loretta Pishney would be present at the United Way Hearings to propose our request for the Senior Transportation Program. To generate more exposure to the recycled cards, it was decided that a 112 off coupon would he printed in the next Senior Newsletter. Board members would set up a small booth at the County Fair to sell the cards. Staff reported on upcoming programs and tours. Meeting adjourned at 11:00 am. • 4 -A- �2) MINUTES • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, August 18, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Dean Wood, Tom Lyke, Craig Lenz, Bill Craig, Roland Ebent and Chairman Gruett. Members Absent: E1Roy Dobratz Also Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator and John Rodeberg, City Engineer. 2. MINUTES Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, July 21, 1992. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY LOUIS BRUNNER TO CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING ON 4TH AVE NW Request withdrawn. • (b) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUESTED BY CITY STAFF Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7:31 p.m. with the reading of publication #4423 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 6, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering amendments to the Zoning ordinance #464 requested by City Staff. City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the amendments were initiated primarily to address storage in the C -4 district, Section 8.12. He commented on the staff recommendations for other proposed changes in the ordinance. Section 6.07 and 8.04 addresses the moving of buildings larger than 10' x 12 Changes in Section 8.03 addresses a continuous perimeter on all principal dwellings including manufactured homes. Sections 8.04 and 8.05 will address corner lots and setbacks. Special Provisions District will also be included in Section 8.05. Finally, Section 8.12 C -4 Dimensional Requirements for accessory buildings will change to 6 Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 7:44 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval to city council. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. .1 -A �3� HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • AUGUST 18, 1992 (c) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BARRY BARTON FOR STORAGE UNITS ON TEXAS AVE. Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7:45 p.m. with the reading of publication #4410 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 9, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request to construct additional storage buildings located on Texas Ave. Marlow Priebe stated Mr. Barton will not obtain the Hillyard property to the West, he presented two sketches of the building proposal. There was discussion on the lot line and the possibility of vacating the easements. Mr. Barton stated the entire area would be fenced in. Discussion followed on access through the fence for fire protection. Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 8:04 p.m. Mr. Ebent moved to recommend approval of the request to city council provided the present lot line is eliminated, a public hearing is set to vacate utility easements, the Fire Marshal approves the site plan, the City Engineer approves on -site drainage and also subject to approval of zoning ordinance revisions. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONTINUATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF " HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION" SUBMITTED BY GARY HASSE Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 8:06 p.m. with the reading of publication #4411 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 9, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary and final plat to be known as "Hasse Hills First Addition ". City Engineer John Rodeberg explained the location of the development and the name change for Gary Hills Estate to Hasse Hills First Addition. Mr. Lyke stated Hutch Utilities commented only the lots in Block 2 would be served by gas in the 92' - 93' season. There was some discussion on parks and playgrounds • contribution to be covered in the subdivision agreement. 2 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 18, 1992 • Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:10 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval according to the recommendation of staff. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL TO MOVE A TEMPORARY OFFICE SPACE ONTO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 340 MICHIGAN ST Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:12 p.m. with the reading of publication #4424 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 6, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request to move a temporary office space onto property located at 340 Michigan St, Allied Mechanical. Mr. Dean Kirchoff, Allied Mechanical, commented on the recommendation of staff for 20' between the buildings as being a hardship. City Engineer John Rodeberg explained the recommendation as possibly from the fire protection aspect. Mr. Kirchoff explained 12' would be the maximum he could go for space. Discussion followed on the • setback on the property. Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:24 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the request provided 12' is maintained between the buildings with a 3' setback and that the conditional use permit expires 9/1/93 as recommended by staff. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY AGRICULTURE ASSOCIATION TO CONSTRUCT AND MOVE BUILDINGS ON THE FAIR GROUNDS PLAT Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:26 p.m. with the reading of publication #4425 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 6, 1992. The request is for a conditional use permit to allow the McLeod County Agriculture Assoc. to construct fair ground building site and move two buildings (Children's Barn and Pork Producers building) located on the Fair Grounds Addition. City Administrator Gary Plotz presented pictures of the buildings to be moved and explained the staff recommendations. 3 • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 18, 1992 Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Ebent the hearing closed at 8:28 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the request. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (g) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF CITY OF HUTCHINSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY PLAT #1 SUBMITTED BY CITY STAFF Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:30 p.m. with the reading of publication #4426 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary and final plat to be known as City of Hutchinson Street Right of Way Plat #1 as submitted by City Staff. City Engineer Rodeberg commented on the history of the street right of way and this plat being the first in the county. The plat will connect McDonald Drive. Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 8:33 p.m. Mr. Craig made a • motion to recommend approval of the request. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (h) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CRAIG EMERY TO MOVE A 1971 MARSHFIELD MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT 53 COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:35 p.m. with the reading of publication #4427 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 6, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to move a 1971 Marshfield mobile home onto Lot 53 at Country Club Terrace. Mr. Emery stated he has received the staff recommendations and will comply with the life safety code issues. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the hearing closed at 8:36 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval as submitted provided the life safety code issues are met as recommended by staff. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. (i) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ALLEN BROWN TO MOVE A 12' X 20' GARAGE ONTO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 447 HURON 2 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • AUGUST 18, 1992 Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:38 p.m. with the reading of publication #4428 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 6, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request for a conditional use permit to move a 12' x 20' garage onto property located at 447 Huron St. City Administrator Gary Plotz presented pictures of the existing buildings and garage to be moved onto the property. Mr. Brown commented on the setbacks and buildings to be moved. Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the request provided the existing accessory buildings are moved, the first one immediately and the tin storage building within 3 months. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF PLANNING COMMISSION BUDGET City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the budget and the $5,000 available from the water management grant. (b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF City Administrator Plotz commented on the Cashwise development and the studies on drainage and traffic. He stated the City Council had two public hearings regarding the proposal. City Engineer Rodeberg commented on the traffic counts. 5. OLD BUSINESS NONE 6. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. 0 • CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT September 11, 1992 Date Date Interest Of Of Institution ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount Firstate 42- 120479 -1 4.00% 6/11/92 11/12/92 400,000.00 Firstate 017020942.6 3.40% 9/10/92 12/10/92 500,000.00 TREAS BONDS 644136 7.18% 12/12/91 2/15/2001 373,500.00 TREAS BONDS 644137 7.13% 12/12/91 10/15/98 310,758.20 Firstate 41- 1214999 -8 4.60% 12/31/91 12/30/92 500,000.00 Firstate 42- 117168 -5 3.40% 9/10/92 12/10/92 300,000.00 Firstate 42- 118337 -5 4.15% 9/10/92 10/8/92 500,000.00 Firstate 42- 120527 -7 3.45% 8/14/92 11/19/92 300,000.00 Firstate 42- 117375 -6 4.10% 8/14/92 11/12/92 550,000.00 Sherson LehmaLCPI 8W6EE50 3.10% 9/1/92 11/2/92 387,843.95 --------------- $4,122,102.15 a 0 0 H• U - T - C - H - I - N - S - O•N M - I•N•N•E•S•O•T•A - 77he L' ",2 in. 104z� _ G�OZU"jt.- r�DZlt�Ll 37 Washington Ave. W. • Hutchinson, MN 55350 • - •• J September 17, 1992 Dear Mayor and City Council members: The MATNSTFEEP- R3TCMSW Business Association worked cooperatively with the City Council this past March, 1992, to secure special legislation to establish a Special Service District in Antchinsan. The Executive Board met on Tuesday, September 15, and set some • preliminary boundries for the Sp ecial Service District. Please see the attached map. The City Administrator and Finance Director are currently gathering the market valves of industrial and commercial properties found within the proposed district. We feel that we are now at the stage to request a draft ordinance as discussed in the August 26 correspondense from City Attorney, Barry Anderson (attached). In sumaary, our group requests the City Council to direct the City Attorney to draft the proposed ordinance for presentation at the regular Council Meeting on Tuesday, November 10. Thank you very much for your consideration. ZIPS 14fp „ P„ Quade President MAI%"M E,T -HLIU IIWN • J CRAW �- CEDAR AVE. T W p e c+ R ] AVE N.W. sEtoNIS Av 4-7 Fl p 1• T - 1 1 • I• 1 2 2 1 f • ; a.' • u .. S . 9 ' ' 1 W ! ! N I- W e • I 6 M•rt••q�TII[',1 4 i• Z Q I A- WASHINGTON N.E. r f� �. �'� pia �� is ♦ � AVE NORTHWEST; FIRST AJEIpOh NORTHEAST r ! 10 10 I 10 I 9 W es! 2 9 3 9 ! W H I C• ] W A OL 6 • a 1 1 ♦ f .. 1 I f 1 m n ® AVENUE ° r Ivcxue 1 J f t l • ] e z e ] 2 j NORTH PAR _ -_- Q Z t S EA: Z w . r .• ! .. Y n• m FIRST AVE. SOUTHWEST i F T AVE. SI I .q ro Y+• 10 p • 1 r0 S ' •_ 9 3 9 t 9 2 • 6 ] 6 ! I I '; • ] a _ 9 e � _ e_ V • SECOND ENUE i' \I I t l ! ! 1 2 ro iiV tl' L 1 ] SOUTHWEST SECOND AVENUE SOIRJA r— -- _ V 1 I to I� iA i m 3? W W • .f t W • W _• t W p• t W ��! p • ] F C • •QUTM FAR• ; THI IO ` - - THIRD i ro 1 ro 1 : s t • • ! I i ♦ • ] ] • ] f ♦ T �1 M • L • • ° FOURTH AVENUE SOUTHw •s e" - -53 • . • p N ] ♦ • e FIFTH AVENUE SOUTHWEST Q f p O 11 W 11 ! j • t t 1 I !! I ] e �I ! Q 6 ] fn t , • II 10 • ! f • ! •��l �PTI `� f 6 ] f • n I • 6 • No Z J i FIFTH t Q z y�j h 10 _ f F • AST 1 r ! 1! II o o L . ! z ] 9 r ! I A T I ° f ] SOUTHWEST SECOND AVENUE SOIRJA r— -- _ V 1 I to I� iA i m 3? W W • .f t W • W _• t W p• t W ��! p • ] F C • •QUTM FAR• ; THI IO ` - - THIRD i ro 1 ro 1 : s t • • ! I i ♦ • ] ] • ] f ♦ T �1 M • L • • ° FOURTH AVENUE SOUTHw •s e" - -53 • . • p N ] ♦ • e FIFTH AVENUE SOUTHWEST Q f p O 11 W 11 ! j • t t 1 I !! I ] e �I ! Q 6 ] fn t , • II 10 • ! f • ! •��l �PTI `� f 6 ] f • n I • 6 • No Z J i FIFTH t Q z y�j h 10 _ f F • N 1 r ! 1! II ] ] o 1 • e ] • AVENUE m AVENUE Y • I • SOUTHEAST MI. ILA SOUTHEAST ro I 1 F • e� • a 9 r ! I f f ] • a N r < _ ] O � t t It ! M 1 • q ] T ID 1 Q ! N t f Il August 26, 1992 AENOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 Peas PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 PAE (5121 557 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Ms. Kay Johnson Mainstreet Project Manager Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Special Assessment District for Mainstreet Our File No. 3188 -92230 Dear Kay: OF COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. I -- I' ER PAUL M. BEOICR C R.OIIC L CARMICBAEL" Sam CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS. mINNESO7A 55416 (512) 545 -9000 1[N TOLL. FREE 800- 343 -4545 FAE(612)545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON. mDOiESOTA 55371 (6121 359 -2214 FAE (612) 359-5506 I am enclosing for your review and information a copy of Chapter • 428 of Minnesota Statutes dealing with special service district procedures. Enabling legislation adopted by the State of Minnesota provided that our special service district will be governed by Chapter 428A. While you certainly should review the statute, I do note several things that I bring to your attention and to the attention of your committee. First, only property that is classified as commercial, industrial or public utility or is vacant land designed for commercial or industrial use, may be subject to the special service district. The statute does require a public hearing and there are certain specific requirements for the hearing, including the fact that notice must be published twice and the hearing must be held at least three days after the last publication. Mailed notice is also required. You will see that there is an objection procedure provided in the statute although the use of this procedure is going to be very cumbersome for the property owner. As long as the special assessment district charges are reasonable and not particularly burdensome, it appears to be very unlikely that an individual property owner would pursue an appeal. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR AE50CLTION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION / I� DAVID E. MOLD GARY D. IICDOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. RARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN 5.800E • LDRA E. FBETLAND DAVID A. BRUIIOOEMANN PAM D. DOVE" JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O. MCOEE CATHRYN D. REHER August 26, 1992 AENOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 Peas PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 PAE (5121 557 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Ms. Kay Johnson Mainstreet Project Manager Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Special Assessment District for Mainstreet Our File No. 3188 -92230 Dear Kay: OF COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. I -- I' ER PAUL M. BEOICR C R.OIIC L CARMICBAEL" Sam CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS. mINNESO7A 55416 (512) 545 -9000 1[N TOLL. FREE 800- 343 -4545 FAE(612)545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON. mDOiESOTA 55371 (6121 359 -2214 FAE (612) 359-5506 I am enclosing for your review and information a copy of Chapter • 428 of Minnesota Statutes dealing with special service district procedures. Enabling legislation adopted by the State of Minnesota provided that our special service district will be governed by Chapter 428A. While you certainly should review the statute, I do note several things that I bring to your attention and to the attention of your committee. First, only property that is classified as commercial, industrial or public utility or is vacant land designed for commercial or industrial use, may be subject to the special service district. The statute does require a public hearing and there are certain specific requirements for the hearing, including the fact that notice must be published twice and the hearing must be held at least three days after the last publication. Mailed notice is also required. You will see that there is an objection procedure provided in the statute although the use of this procedure is going to be very cumbersome for the property owner. As long as the special assessment district charges are reasonable and not particularly burdensome, it appears to be very unlikely that an individual property owner would pursue an appeal. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR AE50CLTION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION / I� Ms. Kay Johnson August 26, 1992 Page 2 Procedures for establishing the service charges are found in Section 428A.03. Please note that service charges may not be imposed to finance a special service if the service is ordinarily provided by the City from general fund revenues. A hearing must be held and notice must be given and mailed to any individual or business organization subject to the service charge. Please read Minn. Stat. §428A.08 carefully as this sets out the procedure for creating the district in the first place. Z hope this correspondence is helpful to you. Best regards. Very truly yours, � r LD & �DOWEL � e G. Barr Anderson • GBA:lm Enclosure 0 s 18 Sec. 44. (SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT; CITY OF HUTCHINSON.I 19 Subdivision 1. (SPECIAL SERVICES DEFINED.) For purposes of 20 this section, "special services" means all services rendered or 21 contracted for by the city of Hutchinson, including, but not 22 limited to: 23 (1) the repair, maintenance, operation, and construction of 24 any improvement authorized by Minnesota Statutes, section 25 429.021; 26 (2) parking services rendered or contracted for by the 27 city; 28 (3) development and promotional services rendered or 29 _contracted for by the city; and • 30 (4) any other service or improvement provided by the cif 31 or development authority that is authorized by law or charter. 32 Subd. 2. [ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT.] The 33 governing body of the city 'of Hutchinson may adopt an ordinance 34 establishing a special service district to be operated by the 35 city of Hutchinson Minnesota Statutes, chapter 428A, governs 36 the establishment and operation of special service districts in the city. L J 85 0 9184 I 9185 SPECIAL SERVICE WSMCT PROCEDURES 42RA.02 CHAPTER 428A J CITIES SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 428.101 SpwW service district prusdurec 428A.05 Collation Of mice darn dcfiwticn 42L -06 Bondi 42LU2 Fi bliahment of apedal attvice 42L&W Adviaury bond district. 428A08 Petition require. 424103 Service charK authority. notice 428A09 veto puav of owes and henin8 requiRmeaLL 428A_10 Fsclusiao from petition 428A.04 EnWeement of apaial srvi a mgw,emcnu and veto ponce. disc c • • 1 i i t 428A.01 SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES; DEFINMONS. Subdivision 1. Applicability. As used in sections 428A.01 to 428A.10, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. City. "City" means the city in which the special service district is autho- rized to be established under a special law. Subd. 3. Special services. "Special services" has the meaning given in the city's enabling legislation. Special services do not include a service that is ordinarily provided throughout the city from general fund revenues of the city unless an increased level of the service is provided in the special service district. Subd. 4. Special service district "Special service district" means a defined area within the city where special services are rendered and the costs of the special services are paid from revenues collected from service charges imposed within that area. Subd. 5. Net tax capacity. "Net tax capacity" means the net tax capacity most recently certified by the county auditor before the effective date of the ordinance or res- olution adopted under section 428A.02 or 428A.03. Subd 6. Land area. "Land area" means the land area in the district that is subject to property taxes. History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; an 14 s 1; 1989 c 319 art 13 s 20 428A.02 ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DISPRICT. Subdivision ].Ordinate. The governing body of the city may adopt an ordinance establishing a special service district. Only property that is classified under section 273.13 and used for commercial, industrial, or public utility purposes, or is vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial or industrial use and located in the special service district, may be subject to the charges imposed by the city on the special service district. Other types of property may be included within the boundaries of the special service district but are not subject to the levies or charges imposed by the city on the special service district- If 50 percent or more of the market value of a parcel of property is classified under section 273.13 as commercial. industrial, or vacant land zoned or designated on a land use plan for commercial or industrial use, or public util- ity for the current assessment year, then the entire market value of the property is sub- ject to a service charge based on net tax capacity for purposes of sections 428A.01 to 428A.10. The ordinance shall describe with particularity the area within the city to be included in the district and the special services to be furnished in the district. The ordi- nance may not be adopted until after a public hearing has been held on the question. Notice of the hearing shall include the time and place of hearing, a map showing the boundaries of the proposed district, and a statement that all persons owning property in the proposed district that would be subject to a service charge will be given opportu- nity to be heard at the hearing. Subd. 2. Notice. Notice of the hearing must be given by publication in at least two issues of the official newspaper of the city. The two publications must be two weeks apart and the hearing must be held at least three days after the last publication. Not _/6, 429A.02 SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 9186 less than ten days before the hearing, notice must also be mailed to the owner of each parcel within the area proposed to be included in the district. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, owners are those shown on the records of the county auditor. Other records may be used to supply the necessary information. For properties that are tax exempt or subject to taxation on a gross earnings basis in lieu of property tax and are not listed on the records of the county auditor, the owners must be ascertained by any Practicable means and mailed notice given them. At the public hearing a person affected by the proposed district may testify on any issues relevant to the proposed dis- trict. The hearing may be adjourned from time to time and the ordinance establishing the district may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the Conclu- sion of the hearing by a vote of the majority of the governing body of the city. Subd. 3. Charges; relationship to services. The city may impose service charges under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 that are reasonably related to the special services provided. Charges for service shall be as nearly as possible proportionate to the cost of furnishing the service, and may be fixed on the basis of the service directly rendered, or by reference to a reasonable classification of the types of premises to which service is furnished, or on any other equitable basis. Subd. 4. Benefit; objection. Before the ordinance is adopted or at the hearing at which it is to be adopted, any affected landowner may file a written objection with the city clerk asserting that the landowner's property should not be included in the district or should not be subjected to a service charge and objecting to: (1) the inclusion of the landowner's property in the district, for the reason that the property would not receive services that are not provided throughout the city to the same degree; (2) the levy of a service charge on the landowner's property, for the reason that the property is exempted under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 or the special law under which the district was created; or (3) the fact that neither the landowner's property nor its use is benefited by the pro- posed special service. The governing body shall make a determination on the objection within 30 days of its filing. Pending its determination, the governing body may delay adoption of the ordi- nance or it may adopt the ordinance with a reservation that the landowner's property may be excluded from the district or district service charges when the determination is made. ` Subd. 5. Appeal to district court. Within 30 days after the determination of the objection, any person aggrieved, who is not precluded by failure to object before or at the hearing, or whose failure to object is due to a reasonable cause, may appeal to the district court by serving a notice upon the mayor or city clerk. The notice shall be 61ed with the court administrator of the district court within ten days after its service. The city clerk shall furnish the appellant a certified copy of the findings and determination of the governing body. The court may all= the action objected to or, if the appellant's objections have merit, modify or cancel it. If the appellant does not prevail upon the appeal, the costs incurred shall be taxed to the appellant by the court and judgment entered for them. All objections shall be deemed waived unless presented on appeal History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; art 14 s 2; 1989 c 929 art 13 s 20 I 428A.03 SERVICE CHARGE AUTHORITY; NOTICE AND HEARING REQUIREMENTS. Subdivision 1. Hearing. Service charges may be imposed by the city within the spe- cial service district at a rate or amount sufficient to produce the revenues required to provide special services in the district. To determine the appropriate rate for a service charge based on net tax capacity, taxable property or net tax capacity must be deter- mined without regard to captured or original net tax capacity under section 469.177 or to the distribution or contribution value under section 473F.08. Service charges may not be imposed to finance a special service if the service is ordinarily provided by the • 9186 owner of each pose of giving uditor. Other ,s that are tax ty tax and are tained by any ing a person Proposed dis- e establishing )f the conclu. 'le city. rvice charges , ecial services to to the cost Aly rendered, which service c hearing at tion with the n the district sson that the e city to the i son that the 0 w under d y the pro- 0 days of its of the ordi- r's property : ermination uion of the before or at - jpeal to the hall be filed ervice. The ermination appellant's it upon the i judgment on appeal. EARING in the spe- equired to r a service I be deter - n 469.177 a s may y the f 9187 SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 471AM city from its general fund revenues unless the service is provided in the district at an increased level. In that case, a service charge may be imposed only in the amount needed to pay for the increased level of service. A service charge may not be imposed on the receipts from the sale of intoxicating liquor, food, or lodging Before the imposi- tion of service charges in a district, for each calendar year, a hearing must be held under section 428A.02 and notice must be given and must be mailed to any individual or busi- ness organization subject to a service charge. For purposes of this section, the notice shall also include: (1) a statement that all interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at the hearing regarding a proposed service charge; (2) the estimated con of improvements to be paid for in whole or in part by service charges imposed under this section, the estimated cost of operating and maintaining the improvements during the first year and upon completion of the improvements, the proposed method and source of financing the improvements, and the annual cost of operating and maintaining the improvements; (3) the proposed rate or amount of the proposed service charge to be imposed in the district during the calendar year and the nature and character of special services to be rendered in the district during the calendar year in which the service charge is to be collected; and (4) a statement that the petition requirements of section 428A.08 have either been met or do not apply to the proposed service charge. Within six months of the public hearing the city may adopt a resolution imposing a service charge within the district not exceeding the amount or rate expressed in the notice issued under this section. Subd. 2. Exemption of certain properties from taxes and service charges. Property exempt from taxation by section 272.02 is exempt from any service charges based on net tax capacity imposed under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10. Subd. 3. Levy limit. Service charges imposed under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 are not included in the calculation of levies or limits on levies imposed under law or charter. History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; an 14 s 3; 1989 c 319 art 13 s 10 428A.04 ENLARGEMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICTS. Boundaries of a special service district may be enlarged only after hearing and notice as provided in sections 428A.02 and 428A.03. Notice must be served in the origi- nal district and in the area proposed to be added to the district. Property added to the district is subject to all service charges imposed within the district after the property becomes a part of the district if it is property of the type that is subject to service charges in the district. On the question of enlargement, the petition requirement in section 428A.08 and the veto power in section 428A.09 apply only to owners, individuals, and business organizations in the area proposed to be added to the district History: 1988 c 719 an 14 s 4 42BA.05 COLLECTION OF SERVICE CHARGES. Service charges may be imposed on the basis of the net tax capacity of the property on which the service charge is imposed but must be spread only upon the net tax capac- ity of the taxable property located in the geographic area described in the ordinance. Service charges based on net tax capacity may be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes. Other service charges imposed must be collected as provided by ordinance. Service charges based on net tax capacity collected under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 are not included in computations under section 469.177, chapter 473F, or any other law that applies to general ad valorem levies. History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; art 14 s 5, 1989 c 329 art 13 s 20 428A.06 SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT PROCEDURES 9188 428A.06 BONDS. At any time after a contract for the construction of all or part of an improvement i authorized under sections 428A.01 to 428A.10 has been entered into or the work has t - been ordered done by day labor, the governing body of the city may issue obligations in the amount it deems necessary to defray in whole or in part the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred in making the improvement, including every item of cost from inception to completion and all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the improvement or the financing. The obligations are payable primarily out of the pro- ceeds of the service charge based on net tax capacity imposed under section 428A.03, or from any other special assessments or nontax revenues available to be pledged for I their payment under charter or statutory authority, or from two or more of those sources. The governing body may, by resolution adopted prior to the sale of obligations, pledge the full faith, credit, and taxing power of the city to assure payment of the princi- pal and interest if the proceeds of the service charge in the district are insufficient to pay the principal and interest. The obligations must be issued in accordance with chap- ter 475, except that an election is not required, and the amount of the obligations need not be included in determining the net debt of the city under the provisions of any law or charter limiting debt. History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; art 14 s 6; 1989 c 319 art 13 s 20 428A.07 ADVISORY BOARD. The governing body of the city may create and appoint an advisory board for each special service district in the city to advise the governing body in connection with the construction, maintenance, and operation of improvements, and the furnishing of spe- cial services in a district. The advisory board shall make recommendations to the gov- erning body on the requests and complaints of owners, occupants, and users of property within the district and members of the public. Before the adoption of any proposal by the governing body to provide services or impose service charges within the district, the advisory board of the district shall have an opportunity to review and comment upon the proposal. History: 1988 c 719 art 14 s 7 428A.08 PETITION REQUIRED. No action may be taken under section 428A.02 unless owners of 25 percent or more of the land area of property that would be subject to service charges in the i pro posed special service district and owners of 25 percent or moo, the at tax gparity of property that would be subject to service charges in the pro posed special service city trict file a petition requesting a public hearing on the pro posed action with the city _ clerk. No action may be taken under section 428A.03 to impose a service charge based on net tax capacity unless owners of 25 percent or more of the land area subject to t a proposed service charge and owners of 25 percent or more of the net tax sub jet to a proposed service charge file a capacity rg petition requesting a public hearing on the pro- pro. posed action with the city clerk. No action may be taken under section 428A.03 to impose any other type of service charge unless 25 percent or more of the individual or business organizations subject to the proposed service charge file a petition requesting a public hearing on the proposed action with the city clerk. If the boundaries of a pro- 4 posed district are changed or the land area or net tax capacity subject to a service charge or the individuals or business organizations subject to a service charge are changed after the public hearing, a petition meeting the requirements of this section must be filed with the city clerk before the ordinance establishing the district or resolution imposing the service charge may become effective. History: 1988 c 719 art S s 84; art 14 s 8; 1989 c 329 art 13 s 20 3 428A.09 VETO POWER OF OWNERS. Subdivision 1. Notice of right to file objections. Except as provided in section 9188 9189 SPECIAL SERVICE DISrRICr PROCEDURES 42WLII 428A.10, the effective date of any ordinance or resolution adopted under sections 428A.02 and 428A.03 must be at least 45 days after it is adopted. Within five days after f an improvement adoption of the ordinance or resolution, a summary of the ordinance or resolution must ;o or the work has be mailed to the owner of each parcel included in the special service district and any issue obligations a individual or business organization subject to a service charge in the same manner that expense incurred T notice is mailed under section 428A.02. The mailing must include a notice that owners every item of cost subject to a service charge based on net tax capacity and individuals and business orga- )nnection with the nirations subject to a service charge imposed on another basis have a right to veto the 1y out of the pro- " ordinance or resolution by filing the required number of objections with the city clerk r section 428A.03, k before the effective date of the ordinance or resolution and that a copy of the ordinance to be pledged for i� or resolution is on file with the city clerk for public inspection. or more of those A Subd. 2. Requirements for veto. If owners of 35 percent or more of the land area sale of obligations, in the district subject to the service charge based on net tax capacity or owners of 35 meat of the princi- z' percent or more of the net tax capacity in the district subject to the service charge based are insufficient to on net tax capacity file ark objection to the ordinance adopted by the city under section rdance with chap 428A.02 with the city clerk before the effective date of the ordinance, the ordinance e obligations need does not become effective. if owners of 35 percent or more of the land area subject to , visions of any law the service charge based on net tax capacity or owners of 35 percent or more of the net <- tax capacity subject to the service charge based on net tax capacity file an objection to 0 the resolution adopted imposing a service charge based on net tax capacity under sec- tion 428A.03 with the city clerk before the effective date of the resolution, the resolu- tion does not become effective. If 35 percent or more of individuals and business z)ry board for each organizations subject to a service charge file an objection to the resolution adopted nnection with the imposing a service charge on a basis other than net tax capacity under section 428A.03 furnish i ng of spe- with the city clerk before the effective date of the resolution, the resolution does not cations to the gov- become effective. In the event of a veto, no district shall be established during the cur- 1 of rent calendar year and until a petition meeting the qualifications set forth in this subdi- propert y proposal by vision for a veto has been filed :it m the district, '* History: 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; art 14 s 9; 1989 c 329 art 13 s 10 yew and comment 428A.10 EXCLUSION FROM PETITION REQUIREMENTS AND VETO POWER. The petition requirements of section 428A.08 and the right of owners and those subject to a service charge to veto a resolution in section 428A.09 do not apply to sea and or subsequent years applications of a service charge that is authorized to be in of 25 25 percent or effect for more than one year under a resolution that has met the petition requirements h in the pro- of section 428A.08 and which has not been vetoed under section 428A.09 for the first e e net net tax capacity year's application. A resolution imposing a service charge for more than one year must service city not be adopted unless the notice of public hearing required by section 428A.03 and the :ion with the city y — notice mailed with the adopted resolution under section 428A.09 include the following vice charge based information: area subject to a (l) in the case of improvements, the maximum service charge to be imposed in tax capacity sub- any year and the maximum number of years the service charges imposed to pay for the =caring 2 3 to the pro- coon improvement; and the individual or (2) in the case of operating and maintenance services, the maximum service charge etition requesting to be imposed in any year and the maximum number of years, or a statement that the Indaries of a pro- service charge will be imposed for an indefinite number of years, the service charges o a service charge will be imposed to pay for operation and maintenance services. are changed after The resolution may provide that the maximum service charge to be imposed in any must be filed with year will increase or decrease from the maximum amount authorized in the preceding .ion imposing the year based on an indicator of increased cost or a percentage amount established by the resolution. _ History: 1988 c 719 an 14 s 10 ,0 in section C September 18, 1992 TO: Mayor & FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator SUBJECT: Crow River Arts Guild For background purposes, the 1993 preliminary budget has $5,000 allocated for the Crow River Arts Guild. This represents the second half - payment of the third and final year commitment. The large operating cost for their building on Main Street amounts to approximately $10,000 per year (including rent, insurance, utilities, etc.). As I understand their request, they would be interested in "joint use" of city -owned facilities. Examples may include: • Sharing the Youth Center during "off" hours. • Sharing the Senior Center during "off" hours. is > Sharing the display areas, perhaps in the future, at the new City Hall (ie., Council Chambers, lobby, etc.). • Securing office and /or meeting space at any city location. These ideas were based on my conversation with Director Bernard Schulte. I would make a suggestion that if the Council desires to pursue the joint -use concept, an ad hoc committee be appointed by the Mayor /Council with a representative from the following: • Senior Center Advisory Board • Youth Center Advisory Board • Park & Recreation Board • Crow River Arts Guild • City Council • City Administration Director Bernard Schulte plans to be at the Council meeting between 8:30 and 9:00 P.M. regarding this request. City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 16 September 1992 0 Members of the City Council of Hutchinson: It is our understanding that the allocation for the Crow River Arts Council for the coming year of 1993 is $5000. We understand your need to control expenditures and fully appreciate your efforts in controlling the City budget. It has, however, placed your Arts Advocacy Agency in a rather precarious monetary position for our fiscal year 93- 94. At the present time, Crow River Arts is leasing a building in the downtown area which accounts for a considerable portion of our budget. Presently we utilize approximately 2000 square feet of which approximately one half is used for display and office area and the other one half is utilized for meeting room and classroom area. Given our situation, it appears that Crow River Arts must pursue one or more of the following courses of action. 1) Curtail its activities severely and then shut down once its resources have been depleted 2) Find alternative sources of financing- to that end a we are attempting to insure that all programs and classes are self sufficient and b) Constantly and actively seeking other sources of revenue 3) Seek alternative facilities and /or co- locate with another city sponsored agency. Rather than attempt to solve a crisis situation next summer, it would appear beneficial for all concerned to address the situation within the immediate future so that decisions could be made this fall and implementation of those decisions could then be made in an orderly fashion this coming spring. Your support over the past two and onehalf years has made it possible for the citizens of Hutchinson to have an Arts Advocacy Agency in the form of Crow River Arts and that has been and is sincerely appreciated. We look forward to working with you and receiving guidance from you in this area. Res pectfu l y Bernard Schulte, Director Crow River Arts Page - 1 l — ORDINANCE NO. 92 - , 2ND SERIES PUBLICATION NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, CHANGING THE BOUNDARIES OF ELECTION PRECINCTS AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. RECITALS: 1. The City of Hutchinson adopted Ordinance No. 92 -51, 2nd Series, Publication No. 4344 effective February 25, 1992, which ordinance adopted new election precincts in accordance with Minnesota Statutes §204B.14; 2. A formal map of the new election precincts has now been prepared and precinct street address range worksheets have also been prepared setting out in greater detail the new precincts; 3. The City of Hutchinson desires to more fully set out the reorganized precincts of the City of Hutchinson without changing the precinct boundaries as established by City Ordinance No. 92 -51 and accordingly, THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: . Section 1. Precinct 1 of the City of Hutchinson shall include all that territory of the City of Hutchinson lying east of the centerline of Highway 15 to the intersection of Lynn Road, extended north to the intersection Lynn Road with Second Avenue S.W., thence easterly along the centerline of Second Avenue S.W. to the intersection of Second Avenue S.W. and Main Street, thence northerly along the centerline of Main Street to the intersection of Main Street and Fourth Avenue N.E., thence in a generally southeasterly direction along the centerline of Fourth Avenue N.E. to the intersection of Bluff Street and thence northeasterly along the centerline of Bluff Street to the City boundary, with all lands hereafter annexed lying east and south of the above designated ward boundary shall be included in Precinct 1. Section 2. The Second Precinct shall include all that territory of the City of Hutchinson lying north and west of the following described lines: Beginning at the intersection of Bluff Street and the city limits and continuing along the centerline of Bluff Street in a southwesterly direction to the intersection of Bluff Street and Fourth Avenue N.E. and continuing in a northwesterly direction along the centerline of Fourth Avenue N.E. to the intersection of Fourth Avenue N.E. and Main Street, thence south along the centerline of Main Street to the intersection of Main Street and Second Avenue S.W., thence west along the centerline of Second Avenue S.W. to the intersection of Second Avenue S.W. and Dale Street, thence proceeding at a 90 degree angle to the south bank of the Crow River and thence along the south bank of the Crow River to a point intersecting with the westerly n, boundary of the City of Hutchinson; lands hereinafter annexed lying • north and west of the above described precinct boundary shall be included in Precinct 2. Section 3. The Third Precinct shall include all that territory of the City of Hutchinson lying west and south of the following described lines: Beginning at the intersection of Highway 15 South and the city limits of the City of Hutchinson, thence along the centerline of said Highway in a northerly direction to Lynn Road and continuing along the centerline of Lynn Road to the intersection of Lynn Road and Second Avenue S.W. thence west along Second Avenue S.W. to the intersection of Second Avenue S.W. and Dale Street, thence proceeding at a 90 degree angle to the south bank of the CRow River and thence along the south bank of the Crow River to a point intersecting with the westerly boundary of the City of Hutchinson; lands hereinafter annexed lying south and west of the above described precinct boundary shall be included in Precinct 3. Section 4. Adopted and incorporated by reference herein are the precinct street address range worksheets for Precincts 1, 2, and 3 and in the event of a conflict between the descriptions set out above and the precincts as set forth in the worksheets, the worksheets shall control. Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this _ day of September, 1992. Mayor Attest: City Administrator Published in the Hutchinson Leader on First reading: Second reading: C • RESOLUTION NO. 9801 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Water Meters $ 8,333.0 Replacement & Resale Water Yes Water Pro The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR Date Approved: September 22. 1992 `Motion made by: Seconded by: Resolution submitted for Council action by: 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9802 RESOLUTION CHANGING HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING TIME WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Planning Commission may establish a new meeting time through a City Council resolution. WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Planning Commission unanimously voted to meet at 5:30 p.m. on the third Tuesday of each month. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA] THAT, the said request for the Planning Commission meeting time change begin in October, 1992, and for all future monthly • meetings. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 0 7'(�% o RESOLUTION NO.9816 • CERTIFYING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO THE COUNTY OF MCLEOD BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA: That the following embraces unpaid assessments levied by the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, under Statutes Sec. 429.011 to 429.111 for the various assessments of the City of Hutchinson, to be levied and assessed upon the properties as listed for the following purposes for the current year, and that a copy thereof be sent to the County Auditor of said McLeod County, Minnesota: 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #185 84 -02 Pt.I Sanitary Sewer 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #187 83- 06Sewer,Watermain,Storm 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #190 Sanitary Sewer & Watermain 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #195 Watermain 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #197 84 -04 Water & Sewer Impro. 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #199 84- 07Sewer,Watermain,Storm 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #202 SanSewer, Watermain,Storm 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #204 San.Sewer,Watermain,Storm 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #206 San.Sewer,Watermain,Appur. 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #207 SanSewer,Watermain ext 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #202A San Sewer & Watermain W 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #208 SanSewer,Watermain,Grading 7 th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #209 Watermain /Storm /Appur 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #210 San.Sewer,Watermain,Storm 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #218 San.Sewer,Watermain,Appur 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #219 San.Sewer,Watermain,Appur 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #220 Water,StormSewer /Grading 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #221 Watermain & Appurtenances 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #222 SanSewer,Water,LiftStation 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #223 Drainage line, inlets 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #224 Water Services 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #225 Watermain,San.Storm Sewer 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #228 Watermain,San.Storm Sewer 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #230 San,Storm Sewer,LiftStation 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #234 Watermain,San,Storm Sewer 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #236 87 -36 San.Sewer,Appur. 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #237 88 -25 San.Sewer,Watermain 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #239 88 -15 SanStorm Sewer,Water 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #240 88 -20 &21 San,Storm,Wtrmain 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #241 88 -19 San,Storm,Watermain 5th installment of 5 yr. assessment- -Roll #246 87 -38 Watermain & Appur 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #247 88 -32 San,Storm,Watermain 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #230A Activate Deferred SanStorm 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #249 89 -01 Watermain & Appur 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #250 89 -02 San,Storm,Watermain 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #255 90 -04 San.Sewer & Appur • 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #258 90 -16 Watermain,San.Sewer 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #261 90 -23 Watermain,San.Sewer 7--D. a STREET IMPROVEMENTS 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #158 1983 Grade /Appurt 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #159 1983 Curb /Gutter /Base /App 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #160 1983 Curb /Gutter /Base /App 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #161 1983 Curb /Gutter /Base /App 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #162 1983 Curb /Gutter /Base /App 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #163 1983 Curb /Gutter /Base /App 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #164 1983 Grade /Surf /Curb /Gut 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #165 1983 Grade /Surface /Appur 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #166 1983 Grade /Surf /Curb /Gut 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #167 1983 Curb /Gutter /Bit.Surf 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #168 1983 On Street Bit.Surface 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #169 1983 Bit. Surface & Appur. 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #178 83 -06 Bituminous Surfacing 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #179 84 -02 Curb /Gut /Grade /Bit 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #180 83 -06 Bituminous Surfacing 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #182 83 -02 Curb /Gutter /Appur 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #188 83 -09 Grading & Gravel 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #189 83 -09 Grade /Gravl /Curb /Gut 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #191 84 -03 Street Improvements 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #192 84 -03 Street Improvements 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #193 84 -01 Pt II Street Improve 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #194 Curb /Gutter /Bit.Surfacing 9th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #198 84 -05 Street Improvements 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #200 1985 Street Improvements 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #201 1985 Curb /Gutter /Appur 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #203 Street Improvements 8th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #205 1985 Bituminous Overlay 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #205A Bituminous Surfacing 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #211 Street Surfacing /Appur 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #212 Curb /Gutter /Grade /Gravel 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #213 Curb /Gutter /Grade /Gravel 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #214 Street Overlay 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #215 Curb /Gutter /Grade /Gravel 7th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #216 Grade /Surface /Appur 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #227 Curb /Gutter /Gravel Base 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #229 Curb /Grade /Gravel Base 6th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #233 Bituminous Surfacing 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #238 88 -02 Bituminous Surfacing 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #242 88 -01 Bit.Surfacing etc 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #243 88 -04 Bit.Surfacing etc 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #244 88- 13 &14 &16 Bit Surfacing 5th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #248 88 -31 Bit.Surf /Appur 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #243A 88 -11 Curb /Gutter /BitSurf 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #251 89 05 &06 &07 &12Curb /Gut /Bit 4th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #253 89 -15 Bit.Surf & Appur 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #256 90 -08 Curb /Gutter /Surf,etc 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #257A 90 -10 Curb /Gut /SUrf,etc 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #257B 90 -11 Curb /Gut /Base /App 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #257C 90 -12 Curb /Gut /Surf /App 3rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #259 90 -05 Curb /Gut /Surf /Grav 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #264 90 -11B Bit.Surf /Curb /Guttr 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #270 91 -13 &14 Bit Surf & Appur • d y WATERMAIN & SANITARY SEWER CONT. * d installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #262 90 -15 Watermain,San.Sewer rd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #262A 90 -15 Watermain,San.Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #266 91 -01 San,Storm,Watermain 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #267 91 -02 San,Watermain,Lift 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #268 91 -10 &12 San,Storm,Wtrmain 2nd installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #273 91 -24 San.Sewer,Watermain 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #275A 92 -01 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #275B 92 -03,04 San,Storm,Wtrmain 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #276 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment- -Roll #277 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - -Roll #278 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #279 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #280 San,Storm,Wtrmain,St 1st installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #281 San,Storm,Wtrmain,5t OFF STREET PARKING 5th installment of 15 yr. assessment - -Roll #152A 1984 Off Street Parking SIDEWALK 10th installment of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll #171 83 -01 -19 Sidewalk & Appur. Assessments deferred Supplement to Roll #171 STORM SEWER t!Q h installment 9th installment 9th 5th 4th 4th 4th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd installment installment installment installment installment installment installment installment installment installment of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 5 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. of 10 yr. assessment - - Roll assessment - -Roll assessment- -Roll assessment - - Roll assessment - - Roll assessment - - Roll assessment - -Roll assessment - -Roll assessment - - Roll assessment - -Roll assessment - -Roll assessment - -Roll #155 1983 Drainage Area #181 84 -02 PtII Storm Sewer Out #190A Storm Sewer #245 88 -17 Storm,San,Watermain #35A 1969 deferred truck sewer #252 89 -15 Storm Sewer #254 89 - -15 Storm Sewer #265 Reactivate deferred Roll 35 #269 91- 04,05 &06 Storm Sewer #271 91 -11 Storm Sewer #272 91 -07 Storm Sewer #274 91 -25 Storm Sewer is BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: 0 That the following embraces unpaid water, sewer & refuse bills and weed cutting and snow removal: $ 72.10 Deane Dietel weed cutting 90.00 Hutch Properties weed cutting 556.20 Norwest Bank Stillwater weed cutting 90.00 Richard Schmidtbauer weed cutting 49.82 Steven & Brad Wick snow removal $227.25 Sec Housing & Urban Dev water, sewer, refuse 441.49 James Schlagel sewer, refuse Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Paul L. Ackland, Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator 0 0 C September 22, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �,QQ FROM HAZEL SITZ, PERSONNEL COORDINATOR RE PERSONNEL POLICY Two small changes need to be made in the City Personnel Policy to update it. The attached Resolution will accomplish this. OVERTIMEiCOMPENSATOP.Y TIME: Actual practice has been to divide the pay period . into two subtotals for hourly employees. An employee may use comp time in one week and be allowed a total of only 40 hours for that week. In the other week of the pay period, there is sometimes a requirement for overtime wort: which could result in a total of more than 46 paid hours. tThe Fair Labor Standards Hct requires overtime pay in any week of more than 4J hours.) DISCIPLINE: The General Records Retention Schedule ipage 34, item 30) which was adopted by the City Council today requires that personnel files and specified contents be retained for 5 ,years after termination. The practice of removing the specified contents needs to be changed with the adoption of the Retention Schedule. • City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Devartnient 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 / —C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 9593 PERSONNEL POLICY DATED NOVEMBER 12, 1991 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON HEREBY AMENDS CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE PERSONNEL POLICY TO REFLECT CURRENT PRACTICE: SECTION 9: OVERTIME The last sentence of paragraph 2 is amended to read "Compensatory time say be used to bring total paid hours only up to 88 in e pep period AU in a week. SECTION 22: DISCIPLINE The last sentence of paragraph l(b) is amended to read "The reprimand will be placed in the employee's personnel file but will be "toyed +rem the +rl•e disregarded after three years from the date of issuance if there has been no subsequent reprimand or other disciplinary action instituted. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. ---------------------------- Paul A. Ackland, or ATTEST- ---------------- 7 ------ 7 ------- Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator • 7 E DAVID R. ARNOLD GARY D. MCDOMELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. HARRY ANDERSON• STEVEN S. HOOF LOS► E. "RYLAND DAVID A. RRUEOOEMANN PAUL D. DOVE •• JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD 0. MCOEE CATHRYN D. REHER E September 4, 1992 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5881 CEDAH LANE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492 (612) 545 -9000 MN TOLL PURE - 34.1 -4545 PAX (6H1) -I" Y Ms. Hazel Sitz Personnel Coordinato City of Hutchinson City Hall 3700 Washington Avenue W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 1 ►� l . Re: General Record Retention Schedule Our File No.: 3750 -92008 Dear Hazel: or M ZL OI LLIAX N. CAMERON RAYMOND C. I AT I rER PAITL M. RROICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL 501 SOUTH YOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (618)369 -8814 PAX (618) 369 -5506 101 PARR PLACE HUT'CHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (518) 567 -7575 PAX (SIR) WT -4096 A — A ox' � GJ .r J Pursuant to our conversation of September 1, 1992 assessing, records vita t Even though the City is uc��" f?y no maintaining such records, there is no harm in having these additional sections as part of the record retention schedule. Indeed, if in the future the City does begin to retain such records, the City will not then have to go through the process of amending the record retention schedule. I have reviewed the proposed resolution which you provided. It appeaYS "�Car'tse-in >QUr. The only suggested revision would be to ttg_Lch a complete copy "M� the General Records Retention Schedule which is - ta - adapte3 - by the City. Perhaps you have had alternative instructions from the Department of Administration indicating that only the one -page summary sheet needs to be attached to such a resolution, but I think it would be preferable to attach a complete copy of the Record Retention Schedule. 'CEHTIPIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE HAR ASSOCIATION �'— "CERTSPI£D AS A REAL PROPERTY LAM SPF.CTALTST PY TRF MTIF.n c TF P.R wc�r �, +env 111 Ms. Hazel Sitz September 3, 1992 • Page 2 Based on the foregoing, it is my understanding that you intend to proceed with placing this matter before the City Council at the September 22, 1992 meeting. I have informed Barry Anderson of this fact. Should you require any additional work prior to the September 22 meeting, please let either Barry or myself know at your convenience. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & MCDOWELL athryn D. Reher CDR /sw cc: G. Barry Anderson • September 24, 1992 Mrs. Hazel Sitz Personnel Coordinator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: General Record Retention Schedule Our File No. 3188 -92231 Dear Hazel: 09 COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL H.BEGICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL 38M CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 600 -343 -4545 FAX (612) 545-1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET RINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 16121 389-2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 IJ I have reviewed the proposed record retention schedule as well as Catherine Rehrer's correspondence of September 4, 1992 and it does appear to me that we are in position to adopt the record retention schedule at the time of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. The history of this transaction essentially is that I noticed this spring that we had not adopted a records retention schedule and I thought this might have been an issue in a number of disputes and cases that we had pending at the time. Fortunately, for a variety of reasons, that turned out not to be the case, but I do believe it is time that we adopt such a schedule. I should also note for the Council's benefit that Hazel has been very helpful in putting this schedule together; it is surprising the number of communities that are not yet in compliance with the Department of Administration guidelines. I would ap reciate it if you wol�lsl_ & e. �._tha_ his _corxeSponderlce. _ Inc,] uded _as .:pares of : the _Council _p a _- well._as resolution. Whether the City Council needs to see the entire schedule is debateable, but it probably should be attached to the resolution for record keeping purposes. 0 A RNOLD & MCDOW ATTORNEYS AT LAw 101 PARK PLACE H UTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 FAX (612) 569 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY G. BARRY ANDERSON 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MITT - ESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION f "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE M. NNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION , 7 / /{— DAVID B. ARNOLD GARY D. MCDOWELL A. ANDERSON • STEVEN O.HARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA E. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN PALM D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O. McGEE CATHRYN D. REBEH September 24, 1992 Mrs. Hazel Sitz Personnel Coordinator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: General Record Retention Schedule Our File No. 3188 -92231 Dear Hazel: 09 COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL H.BEGICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL 38M CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 600 -343 -4545 FAX (612) 545-1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET RINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 16121 389-2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 IJ I have reviewed the proposed record retention schedule as well as Catherine Rehrer's correspondence of September 4, 1992 and it does appear to me that we are in position to adopt the record retention schedule at the time of the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. The history of this transaction essentially is that I noticed this spring that we had not adopted a records retention schedule and I thought this might have been an issue in a number of disputes and cases that we had pending at the time. Fortunately, for a variety of reasons, that turned out not to be the case, but I do believe it is time that we adopt such a schedule. I should also note for the Council's benefit that Hazel has been very helpful in putting this schedule together; it is surprising the number of communities that are not yet in compliance with the Department of Administration guidelines. I would ap reciate it if you wol�lsl_ & e. �._tha_ his _corxeSponderlce. _ Inc,] uded _as .:pares of : the _Council _p a _- well._as resolution. Whether the City Council needs to see the entire schedule is debateable, but it probably should be attached to the resolution for record keeping purposes. 0 A RNOLD & MCDOW ATTORNEYS AT LAw 101 PARK PLACE H UTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 FAX (612) 569 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY G. BARRY ANDERSON 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MITT - ESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION f "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE M. NNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION , 7 / /{— Mrs. Hazel Sitz September 14, 1992 Page 2 Perhaps reference to it could simply be made in a covering memo inviting Council members and other interested parties to review it rather than physically photocopying the entire schedule for all Council members. This is a procedural matter and I leave it to your review and attention. Thank you. Best personal regards. Very trul ARNOLD & G. Barry GBA:lm • • 0 RESOLUTION NO.9�15_ RESOLUTION ADOPTING GENERAL RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 139.17 requires the approval of the attorney general, state auditor, and director of the Minnesota Historical Society before any officer or agency of the state or any county, city, town, school district, municipal subdivision or corporation, or other public authority or political entity within the state can dispose of any governmental records AND WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Administration and a task force made up of city officials from around the state have developed a general records retention schedule for cities which has been approved by the attorney general, state auditor, and director of the Minnesota Historical Society AND WHEREAS, the classification of records as herein described is included in the above mentioned Records Retention Schedule NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Hutchinson City • Council does hereby adopt the general records retention schedule as attached hereto. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be submitted along with the Notification of Adoption of City General Retention Schedule form to the Government Records Archivist. Adopted this ----- - - - - -- - day of ----------- - - - - -, 1992 Paul L. Ackland, Mayor s ATTEST: -------------------- - - - - -- Gary D. Platz, City Administrator 7 -F C September 3, 1992 MEMO T O: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJE HEALTH & DENTAL IN R ENEWALS Dennis Potter, Insurance Planner Agency, and Mark Flaten, American Risk Services, will be on hand to discuss the renewal of our health and dental insurance. Attached are copies of renewal quotes prepared by Mark Flaten for our health and dental programs which renew September 1. The proposal show a 5% rate adjustment for dental insurance and 14% rate increase for health insurance. is City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Q l , 08/31�92 11'29 S 4 AMERICAN RISK 81 eA American Risk Services, Inc. August 31, 1992 VIA FAX 1- 234.4240 Mr. Ken Merrill Finance Director City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: 9.1 -92193 Benefit Rates Dear Ken: TH -�W5 OR IiAl(- e Tel: (612) 559.7300 Pax: (612) 559.7640 Enclosed please find the revised recommended funding level for the period 9 -1 -92/93 based upon the changes indicated in the Plan of Benefits schedule dated August 5, 1992. Blue Cross/Blue Shield allowed a 5.5% reduction in the specific and the aggregate attachment point rates based upon the revised schedule. This includes a PCs drug co -pay of $7.00 for formulary and $10.00for non - formulary. If you increase the PCS co -pay to $10.00 and $15.00 there would be an additional 13% reduction. Based upon my calculations, the recommended funding level for the 9 -1 -92193 should be: Single $17531 Family $39234 I have enclosed a worksheet for your review. Should you have any questions on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Best Regards. Sincerely, Mark T. Flaten President MTF /}aa/chbr Enclosure • cc: Dennis Potter Insurance Planners VIA FAX 1. 587.0808 Risk Management Employee Benefits Consultants Northwest Business Campus 3033 Campus Drive, Suite A418 MinneapolikMN 55441.2620 3a 8, B o 0 X87 MY ' f1 Y V_ City of Hutchinson Health Care Cost Projections 911192 -93 Medical # 1101 Del, 80 120 Next 52000 Select Care Inventory Rate for Expected Lease& Rate for Aggregate Stop Leas Expected Losses Aggregate Stop Loss Attachment Administration Fee Transplant Coverage PROJECTED COSTS FUNDING LEVEL ® EXPECTED Administration Fee LiWAD &D Premium Medical Conversion Individual Stop Loss - $25,000 Transplant Coverage 40 Claim Dollars Available Total Monthly Funding FUNDING LEVEL ® AGO ATTACH Administration Fee Life/AD &D Premlum Medical Conversion individual Stop Loss - 525,000 Transplant Coverage Claim Dollars Available Total Monthly Funding Current Funding Level Recommended Increase (Decrease) RECOMMENDED FUNDING LEVEL: w/ PCS Drug CoPay S7 /510 COBRA Monthly Rate • Claim Rate: P -,a (A) (B) (C) Weighting Single Family Factor 16 68 Single Family 129.86 303.22 162.32 379.03 24,932.76 247,430.82 31.165.95 309,288.52 16.00 16.00 1.10 3.55 2.30 Monthly Factors Single Family 16.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.01 51.35 1.10 3.55 129.86 303.22 168.97 374.13 Monthly Factors Single Family 16.00 16.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.01 51.35 1.10 3.55 162.32 379.03 201.43 449.93 154.46 345.67 14% 14% 175.31 392.34 178.82 400.18 136.20 321.43 (D) Wcightod Family (B•C) 156 Annual 272,363.58 340,454.47 16,128.00 3,108.00 Monthly Costs Single Family 256.00 1,088.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 352.14 3,491.89 17.60 241.40 2.077.73 20.619.23 2,703.47 25.440.52 Monthly Costs Single Family 256.00 1,088.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 352.14 3,491.89 17.60 241.40 2,597.16 25,774.04 3,222.91 30,595.33 31- Aug-92 Total Count (A.D) 172 Annual Costs Single Family Torsi 3,072.00 13,056.00 16,128.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4125.74 41,902.66 46,128.40 211.20 2,896.80 3,IO8.00 24,932.76 247,430.82 272.363.58 32,441.70 305,286.28 337,727.97 Annual Costs Single Family Tom: 3,072.00 13,056.00 16,128.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,225.74 41,902.66 46.128.40 211.20 2,896.80 3,108.00 31,165.95 309,288.52 340.454.47 38,674.89 367,143.98 405,818.87 288,441.25 +' City o of Hutchinson Health Care Cost Projections V ' (A) (B) (C) (D) Dental Weighting Weighted Total Single Family Factor Family Count (B (A +D) Inventory 16 68 2.30 156 172 Single Funny Annual Raze for Expected Los 13.92 39.00 Expected Losses 2.673.02 31,820.16 34,493.18 Ad mini:=sti on Fee 1.75 4.91 4,346.14 Commission 5.00% 5.00% PROJECTED COSTS FUNDING LEVEL 0 EXPECTED LOSS Monthly Factors Monthly Costs Annual Costs Single Family Single Family Single Family Total Admini ation Fee 1.75 4.91 28.07 334.11 336.80 4,009.34 4,346.14 Commission 0.70 1.95 11.14 132.58 133.65 1.591.01 1.724.66 Claim Dollars Available 13.92 39.00 222.75 2,651.68 2,673.02 31,820.16 34,493.18 Total Monthly Funding 16.37 45.86 261.96 3,11838 3,143.47 37,420.51 40,563.98 RRENT FUNDLING LEVEL: 15.64 43.79 - RED COhIME.NDID FUNDING LEVEL: 16.42 45.98 40,672.30 COBRA Monthly Rate 16.75 46.90 Claim Rate: 13.96 39.10 34,585.29 • ,� 7 r DAVID B.ARNOLD GARY D. MCDOWELI STEVEN A.A.NDERSOR • O.BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA E. PRETLAND DAVID A. BRUE00EMANN PALM D. DOVE " JOSEPH M. PAIEMERT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O.MCOEE CATHRYN D. REBER 1ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW - 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 PAN (612) 587 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON September 10, 1992 OF COCNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. LALLIES PAUL M.BEOICH CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL" 58M CEDAR TARE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545 MN TOLL FREE 800- 343-4545 PAX (612) 545-1793 501 SOUTH POURTH STREET PRINCETON, MLNSESOTA 35391 1612( 389 -2214 PAX (6121389-3506 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator c °r 37 Washington Avenue West a Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 RECEIVED z Re: Petro Petro Fund Application Our File No. 3244 -89031 Dear Gary: Enclosed herewith please find a new Petro Fund Reimbursement Application form which should be placed on the City Council agenda and approved by the City Council at our next regularly scheduled meeting. Please make a copy of this form and all attachments for your file once it has been signed by yourself and the Mayor. • The signed originals should be returned to our office for filing with the Petro Fund. We have been advised by the Petro Fund that the next meeting of the Petro Fund will be in October. The application will likely be approved in early 1993. I am also enclosing for City Council information and review a copy of the correspondence received from Mr. Fellows dated July 22, 1992. Although I would ask Ken to check my figures, according to the information that I have, the total cost of the project to date is as follows: $ 87,205.35 - Twin City Testing invoice up to the first application for reimbursement $ 13,500.00 - Cost of constructing the remediation building $108,593.69 - Twin City Testing invoices up to and including June 8, 1992 $209,299.04 - Total cost to date. 0 'CERTIFIED AS A OIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MIN NESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION Mr. Gary D. Plotz • September 10, 1992 Page 2 I thought the Council would like an update on the status of this file and a supplemental application can now be forwarded to the Petro Fund. Very truly yours, ;• • DI G. Barry GBA:lm Enclosure • • 0 rI L if turn cites testinq c son e 002 CnOMWELI AVENUE Sr. PAUL. MN 53114 PHONE 817JE45 -3001 July 22, 1992 Mr. G. Barry Anderson Arnold k McDowell 101 Park Place Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2563 Subject: MPCA Leak #2801 Hutchinson, Minnesota Arnold k McDowell #3244 -89031 TCT #4231 -92-67 Dear Mr. Anderson: The purpose of this letter is to respond to the following concerns presented in your letter dated July 13, 1992. - The recently issued SOIL VACUUM EXTRACTION SYSTEM INSTALLATION AND MONITORING REPORT (S VE Report). In particular, "are we on schedule to be able to cease clean up within a reasonable period of time ? ". Petrofund Reimbursement What portion of the recent set of invoices should be eligible for reimbursement by the Petrofund? The appropriateness of the remediation building as a reimbursable expense. The purpose of the SVE Report was to present details of the soil vacuum extraction system installed at the site and the results of monitoring performed during the first several months of operation. This type of report is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Q- 1PCA). The important points of the report are as follows: 1. Concentrations of hydrocarbons (pollution) in the vapor extracted from the subsurface have decreased dramatically since the system has been operating, This is very good news because the MPCA stated in their Corrective Action Design approval letter (April 10, 199)) that "Closure will be considered when vapor concentrations reach minimal or nearly non - detectable levels ". The reduction in hydrocarbon concentrations is shown in Table 5, page 16 of the report (attached). 9 " A memos. *I 0,. HIH gm.0 m C"OMiee ZO'd 9607L856 01 nU3;way0 -1ned :�S -lol Woad Lr:£S J z66S- SL -d3S Arnold do McDowell • Page 2 2. The rate of hydrocarbon emissions from the system is below MPCA Significant Emission Rates, as shown in Table 6, page 17 -18 of the report. This is also good news because it means treatment of the system exhaust is not necessary. I have discussed the S VE Report with Mr. John Moeger, the MPCA Project Leader, and brought these points to his attention. The cleanup is proceeding in the manner in which it was originally designed, and yes, I believe we are on schedule to be able to cease cleanup within a reasonable period of time. However, cleanup goals for the site which were set by the MPCA (April 10, 1991) are based on groundwater quality as well as hydrocarbon concentrations in the soil venting system emissions. Although the MPCA agrees with our contention that extraction and treatment of the groundwater is not warranted, they set a groundwater cleanup goal for the site of 1,000 parts per billion benzene. There has been only one quarterly groundwater monitoring event at the site since the start up of the soil venting system. The results of that sampling event were presented to th MPCA (cc: Mr. Gary Plotz, Mr. G. Barry Anderson) and indicate that although hydrocarbon concentrations in groundwater have generally declined, levels of benzene at monitoring wells MW -1 and MW -2 are above the cleanup goal (Table 2, Groundwater Chemical Analysis Results, attached). The wells were re- sampled on July 10, 1992. As analytical results become available • they will be reported. It is anticipated that the results will confirm that hydrocarbon levels in the groundwater are decreasing, hopefully to below the site cleanup goal. 11<=- , , It is my understanding that during the initial Petrofund Reimbursement process Mr. Moeger expressed concerns to the Petroboard pertaining to TCT expenses related to the initial environmental assessment of the entire Shopko project site. TCT provided a breakdown of expenses by geographic location and by eligible vs. ineligible. However, all of the expenses incurred by TCT and included in the recent set of invoices we prepared for you are related to corrective action to clean up the site. The cover Ietters and detailed itemizations included with each of the invoices illustrate this. Cleanup or corrective action expenses are eligible for reimbursement. If you would like me to prepare a separate letter to this effect I would be pleased to do so. Arnold & McDowell Page 3 L� The remediation building was constructed below grade. If the building could have been constructed above grade it would Mmly have been less expensive. Estimates for a similar building constructed above grade could be solicited to get an idea of the difference in cost. The question of the appropriateness of the additional expense could be answered by Ms. Robin Hanson (297 -4017) or Ms. Susan Bergh (297 -7038) of the Department of Commerce. If I can be of further assistance to you on this matter please let me know. If you have any additional questions about this project please call me at 659 -7596. Sincerely, MO4,J�l� William E. Fellows, P.E. Project Manager attachments • cc: Mr. Gary Plotz Mr. Ken Merril E TABLE 2 Groundwater Chemical Analysis Results ShopX0 Stores Hutchinson, Minnesota 4231 -92 -0067 Hydrocarbons Sampling Ethyl as Loc ation Date Benzene Benzene Toluene r1e0g�rZaseli� ne MW -1 3/20192 1,400 620 ND 170 NA 11/12/91 1,100 2,200 ND 2,400 1,800 10/16/90 ND ND ND ND NA 6/28/90 2 ND ND ND 72 MW -2 3/20/92 2,800 1,300 1,900 5,000 NA 11/12/91 4,500 2,000 5,900 12,000 43,000 10/16/90 1,600 12 18 3,700 NA 6/28/90 I,100 2,100 4,300 8,600 28,000 MW-4 3/20/92 200 450 ND 490 NA 11/12/91 ND 35 ND ND 430 1/16191' 390 11 NA 14 1,500 10116/90 6 ND ND ND NA 6/28/90 1,200 1 56 900 4,200 MW -6 3/20/92 ND ND ND ND NA 11/12/91 NA NA NA NA NA 6128/90 ND ND ND ND NA RAL lb 700 1,000 10,000 All values are in ug/L which is equivalent to parts- per - billion (ppb) NA = Not Analyzed ND = Not Detected RAL = Recommended AIlowable Limit for Drinking Water V 0 I. /t twirl rihv F... -...�- TCT "231 92 -67 Page 16 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF VAPOR TABLES HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS (ppm) Date 01/24/92 (2;40 pm) 01/24192 (3:40 pm) 01/31/92 02/25/92 02/28/92 03/06/92 03/31/92 0 04/30/92 06/12/92 20 4 7 2 1 0.9 ND ND ND ND 63 70 67 156 !23 65 21 17 405 338 101 57 55 30 21 7 Pi ll NQ NQ NQ 261 202 971 42 30 21 19 This value represents the total concentration enzene; because the Of xylate and ethyl b compounds CO -elute and are indistinguishable with the portable GC apparatus used. � m .Not Detected - NQ t Not Quantified 4 ws System emission rates were estimated by multipt� Ag the concentration of hydrocarbons. in the effluent air stream as indicated by a GC by the air now rate. The results are summarized in Table 6. • Xylene/Ethyt Benzene Benzene• , Toluene vnr+ c4P gcAb�C�SF, 0i nu3iWaUn —rna,d 15 -1J1 Wod-j 8b:Zt 766t— St —d3S E SUMMARY OF EXPENSES May 1991 to May 1992 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PETROFUND APPLICATION E Applicant: City of Hutchinson Site: Proposed Shopko Store Location: Hutchinson, MN Date: June 8, 1992 Date Invoice # Amount Contractor May -91 4231 -91- 0067.05 3063.41 Twin City Testing June -91 91- 0067.06 3192.40 Twin City Testing July -91 91- 0067.07 1126.66 Twin City Testing Aug -91 91- 0067.08 1172.30 Twin City Testing Sept -91 91- 0067.09 1426.00 Twin City Testing Oct -91 92- 0067.00 8806.90 Twin City Testing Nov -91 92- 0067.01 31449.72 Twin City Testing Dec -91 92- 0067.02 16978.59 Twin City Testing Jan -92 92- 0067.03 11490.21 Twin City Testing Feb -92 92- 0067.04 6196.94 Twin City Testing March -92 92- 0067.05 10202.90 Twin City Testing April -92 92- 0067.06 3021.64 Twin City Testing May -92 92- 0067.07 10466.02 Twin City Testing $108593.69 fl —I' MINNESOTA PETROLEUM TANK RELEASE COMPENSATION BOARD Application for Reimbursement PART I APPLICATION PROCESS 6 7 heck Check appropriate Phase and complete the information requested for the Phase One) checked (See Application Guide). [ ] Phase 1. MPCA approval of Soil Corrective Action Plan (SCAP). a) Date of SCAP approval / / . (Attach copy) b) Date SCAP was submitted to MPCA [ ] Phase 2. Submission of Documentation of Soil Treatment Date Documentation was submitted to MPCA / / [ ] Phase 3. MPCA approval of Comorehensive Corrective Action Plan_ (CLAP) a) Date of CCAP approval / / . (Attach copy) b) Date CCAP was submitted to MPCA / / Phase 4. Submission of CCAP Installation Letter to MPCA Date of CCAP Installation Letter / / . (Attach copy) [x] PART H • 1. Pi 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. r� L Lei qLaltinfun } S APPLICANT INFORMATION Please be advised that the information cared to support this application is subject to audit by the MPCA and MDOC. "Responsible Person" [ ] "Volunteer" [ 3 1 or "Non - Responsible Person" [ ] (check one) (see appticadoa guide) Name: City of Hutchinson. a Minnesota municipal corporation Mailing Address: _37 Washingtnn Avenue West. Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Phnne•l612 587 -5151 Site ID: Leak # The applicant is a: (I Corporation [ ] Partnership [ ] Individual [ ] Other Applicant was the owner or operator of the tank from / / to "Volunteer" Applicant owned property freakxx xx xx�Wx x x, Redevelopment property. Has applicant executed any Petrofund assignment agreements? yes_ no Name of assignee(s) (attach copy of agreement) R�._r �z �t��:1►��1.1��l 1. Name of "Tank Facility" (see application guide) where the petroleum release occurred: Mike Mobil (downtown) 2. Tank Facility address: /.7 Main street North_ Hutchinson. Mn. 55350 3. Contact Person at Tank Facility: Mike Commerford Phone: (612) 587 -3065 4. To the best of your knowledge, list all other persons besides the applicant who were owners or operators of the tank during or after the petroleum release: Ford A. Rolfe, 512 Lincoln Avenue, Hutchinson, Mo. (now deceased) Michael J. Commerford, Rural Route i13, Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Omar M. & Velma Collis, 302 South Lakeside, Lake Crystal, Mn. 56055 5. Did any of the persons listed in question 4 incur corrective action costs related to this petroleum release? yes_ no If yes, list name and address if known: Mr. Collis incurred some expense in connection with tank removal and disposal which is not an eligible cost for reimbursement. • 6. Date when petroleum release was detected: s / 1 /go What test was performed to initially establish that a release occurred? sfte observation and soil borings 7. Date when petroleum release was reported to the N PCA: 5 / 1 /90 . (approximate) 8. a. Which tanks (or associated piping) were the source of the release at this tank facility? (see application guide) 1h6FB W6FO &--Q EL,(1(10 gall gas ^line ranks anrd one 4.000 gallon gasoline tank located underground on the site. They have since been removed. These tanks, or their predeceasors, were the source of the release at this tank f a cil ity. b. What was the cause of the release? 9. Was this tank(s) used only to store heating oil for consumptive use on the premises where stored? (check one) YES [ ] NO [ I • PART IV TANK INFORMATION AND COMPLIANCE (Note: If you do not know if tanks are registered and/or prior tank removal notice was given, enter "unk (unknown) for these items. Please do not contact the WPCA for this information.) A. Underground Storage Tanks. Complete the following information to reflect the status of your underground storage tanks at the time the release was discovered. Refer to the attachment "Do Underground Storage Tanks and Piping Requirements Apply to Your Petroleum Tank ?" and "Whitt Do You Have To Do? /When Do You Have To Act ?" to determine the applicability of registration, leak detection, corrosion protection, and spill/overfill protection. (Please attach additional sheets if more than five tanks are involved.) Tank Petroleum Product Capacity Type of Tank Date Installed Registered Yes/No/Unk Date Removed I INFORMATION ALRI ADY SUBMITTEI ON SCAP WORKS1 EET. 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 r L_ Tank Tank Tightness Piping Tightness Test Dates Test Dates 1 2 3 4 5 Tanks Piping Tank Leak Detection (Methods) Corrosion Protection ( Yes /No) Spill/OverfW Protection (Yes/No) Type of Piping Leak Detection (Methods) Corrosion Protection (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 Tank Tank Tightness Piping Tightness Test Dates Test Dates 1 2 3 4 5 * Was 10-day prior tank removal notice given to MPCA? (YES /NO /UNK) YES * Which MPCA office was notified: St. Paul x Duluth _ • Brainerd = Detroit Lakes Marshall _ Rochester _ * If the tank(s) involved in the release was removed after July 9, 1990, complete the following: Unknown, removal of tank arranged for by Omar Collis, then the owner of the property. Removal Contractor: MPCA Contractor (NOT Supervisor) Certification Number: * If the tank(s) involved in the release was installed after July 9, 1990, complete the following: Installation Contractor: Not applicable MPCA Contractor (NOT Supervisor) Certification Number: B. Aboveground Storage Tanks. Complete the following information to reflect the status of the aboveground tanks involved in the release at the time the release was discovered. In describing your secondary containment, specify: • * materials used to construct both the base and the walls, including type and thickness of materials (e.g., 6" compacted clay, 30 mil HDPE, reinforced concrete slab floor /concrete block walls, none) * how material specifications are known (e.g., permeability tests/dates, installation specifications) * is the volume of the secondary containment area adequate for the contents of the largest tank (Y /N) r . L. Tank Contents Capacity Date Installed Rq&tered Yet/NO/Unk Description of Secondary Containment WWh Base Verification Vol. Sample unleaded 15,000 111147 Y Concrete Block 6"compad c1ay 16" gravel,fll Perm test on (date) N 1 2 3 AA RT IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP * Descriptions must be specific as to work performed. * Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. • * Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. * Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. C. EXCAVATION Description F"um Name Invoice # or date Total Units Unit Costs Sub - total See Attached Exhibit "A" TOTAL u D. SOIL DISPOSAL Description Invoice I I Total I Unit I Sub - FIrm Name or date Units Costs total TOTAL PART IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSfiEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP s Descriptions must be specific as to work performed. s Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. • ' Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. ' Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. E. WATER TREATMENT Invoice k Total Unit Sub - Description Fum Name or date Units Costs total TOTAL PART IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP ' Descriptions must be specific as to work performed. • Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. . s Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. • Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. F. TRUCKING Invoice N Total Unit Sub - Description Fhm Name or date Units Costs total TOTAL G. EMERGENCY and TEMPORARY HAZARD CONTROL (see application guide) • Description Firm Name Invoice / or date Total Units Unit Costs Sub - total TOTAL PART IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP ' Descriptions must be speck as to work performed. s Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. • s Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. ' Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. H. SITE RESTORATION and CLOSURE Invoice N Total Unit Sub - Description Fum Name or date Units Costs total TOTAL I. OTHER CLEAN -UP or INVESTIGATION COSTS PART IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - CONSULTANT SERVICES ' Description must be specific as to work performed. s Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. • ; Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. s Duplicate this form if additional sheets are needed. J. REPORT PREPARATION; DATA COLLECTION; OPERATION OVERSIGHT AND MAINTENANCE; SYSTEM MONITORING; CORRESPONDENCE; MILEAGE; POSTAGE; PER DIEM PART IN ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP ' Descriptions must be specific as to work performed. ' Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. . ' Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. ' Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. K. MARK -UP 4 Description Firm Name General Contractor Invoice # Sub - Contractor Invoice X Mark Up % Sub - Total LEE TOTAL L. OTHER CONSULTANT SERVICES (specify) AP RT IV ELIGIBLE COST WORKSHEET - INVESTIGATION AND CLEAN -UP s Descriptions must be speck as to work performed. s Invoices must be submitted for each cost listed below. • * Invoices must contain sufficient detail to verify costs and services entered below. s Duplicate this form if additional worksheets are needed. A. SOIL BORINGS /MONITORING WELLS - ETC. Invoice k Total Unit Sub - Description Fum Name or date Units Costs total TOTAL B. LABORATORY TESTS AND ANALYSIS Invoice N Total Unit Sub - Description Firm Name or date Units Costs total • TOTAL Are there any special circumstances you would like the persons reviewing your application to be aware of! Please explain: —AR V ELIGIBLE COSTS 1. The Eligible Cost Worksheets attached are for INVESTIGATION costs, CLEAN -UP costs, and CONSULTANT costs. These worksheets must be completed listing each corrective action for which you are requesting reimbursement. 2. Invoices submitted with this application cover the period from 5 / 1 / 91 to s / 31/ 92 3. Are any of the costs listed in the Eligible Cost Worksheets in dispute? yes_ no X (see application guide) 4. At this time, do you anticipate incurring any Ongoing corrective action costs relative to the petroleum release at this Tank Facility? yes xX no_ If yes, explain briefly what work will be done and an Mroximate cost of that work. Full detail is set forth in the soil vacuum extraction system installation and monitoring report (Twin City Testing File No. 4231- 92 -67). Continued monitoring of the site will be required as well as removal of the extraction equipment an support services upon completion of extraction. 5. a. Please state the total amount of contaminated soil which was excavated at this site (cubic yards or tons): The MPCA in conjunction with Twin City Testing determined it woul • be mole c s eff ctive t can truct a soi vacuum extraction system and accordi only �imi�e con aminate� soi was remove . b. What was the soil conta�tina h� tion concentratiRn total r�carbon� pp��[[tt11 Concentrations varie greatly given t e ize t e sit .�Uf`tull detail, see ari us Twin Ci y TesCf reports. 6. l as t ie applicant beenn ehgke to recover cleanup costs arising from this petroleum release under any insurance policy at any time since June 4, 1987? yes no x p r o vide If yes, Insu ran c e ComMy Policy Policy Lim Deduct Per Covered 7. Total of all eligible costs as listed $ 122 ,093.69 in the Eligible Cost Worksheets: X 90% $ 109,884.32 Insurance Reimbursement - $ -o- 1 (Subtract) Total Reimbursement Request = $ 109,884.32 (See application guide) PART V C ONTRACTORS/CO NSULTAA 1. Complete the following for all contractors, subcontractors, consultants, engineering firms or • others who performed corrective actions at this release site. (see application guide) Failure to provide this information for ALL persons who performed corrective action may result in an action to recover any reimbursement which may be paid. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name of individual or firm: Twin City Testing Corporation Mailing address: 662 Cromwell Avenue, St. Paul, Mn. 55114 Contact person: William E. Fellows Phone: ( 612 645 -3601 Name of individual or firm: winkalmnn R„i,riing Corporation Mailing address: P.O. Box 1144 East Highway 23, St. Cloud, Mn. 5630 Contact person: Mr. Winkelman Phone: ( 1 Name of individual or firm: u Mailing address: Contact person: Phone: ( Name of individual or Mailing address: Contact person: Phone: ( ) Name of individual or firm: Mailing address: Contact person: Phone: ( 1 2. Describe below any relationship, financial or otherwise, between the applicant and any contractor who performed work at this site: 0 - PART VII CERTIFICATION (see application guide) A. "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel • properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. "I certify that if I have submitted invoices for costs that I have incurred but that remain unpaid, I will pay these invoices within 30 days or receipt of reimbursement from the board. I understand that if I fail to do so, the board may demand return of all or any portion of reimbursement paid to me and that if I fail to comply with the board's demand, that the board may recover the reimbursement, plus administrative and legal expenses in a civil action in district court. I understand that I may also be subject to a civil penalty." Witnessed by: Signature of Applicant Paul L. Ackland Name Gary D. Plotz Name (Please Print) September 22, 1992 Date Date September 22, 1992 * ExM applicant must sign Part A. above. If applicant is a corporation or partnership, the following certification must W.5g be made: "I further certify that I am authorized to sign and submit this application on behalf of Signature Mayor of Hutchinson Title (See Application Guide, Part VI) Name (Please Print) September 22, 1992 Date Please send this application and accompanying documents to: Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board Minnesota Department of Commerce 133 East Seventh Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612) 2974203 (612) 297 -1119 C DATE: 22, 1992 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Water Billing Department SUBJECT: Delinguent water & sewer accounts for the month of Sent Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts for the month of Sept. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday, Sept 28th, 1992 at Noon. 1- 685 - 0841 -032 Delbert Guthmiller 841 Main St S Hutchinson MN 55350 841 Main St S • 85.09 1- 685 - 0148 -052 Greg DeWitte 148 Milwaukee Av Hutchinson MN 55350 148 Milwaukee Av 130.14 1 -960- 0130 -093 Jerry Uzzel 12100 Marion Ln Apt 6118 Minnetonka MN 55343 130 Washington Av E 1049.84 2- 035 - 0626 -093 Robin Osland 1866 Lee Blvd #23 Hoover Estates N Mankato MN 56003 626 Second AV SW 137.91 cc: John Hamilton 626 Second Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises 10/23/92 3 -275- 0771 -092 David Schwarze 1035 Texas Av N2A Hutchinson MN 55350 771 California St 39.70 cc: Vesta Kelly 771 California St Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises 9/25/92 1 -965- 0225 -005 David Freund 225 Washington Av W Hutchinson MN 55350 225 Washington Av W 247.57 • City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks &Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9 - -A ) Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled Paper - M E M O R A N D U M 1- 2 X5350 Gar 120 E Hut 120 E 277 1- 360 - 0215 -034 Darol Wylie 215 Division Av Hutchinson MN 55350 215 Division Av 34.86 1- 395 - 0505 -015 Martin Garcia 505 Franklin St S Hutchinson MN 55350 505 Franklin St S 141.40 1- 395- 0565 -086 Judy Kopesky Box 606 Hutchinson MN 55350 565 Franklin St S 176.81 1 420 - 0705 -082 Ma Betker ,�,� .q Z 705 en S �Z Hutch' on MN 5350 705 len t S .52 1- 455 - 0316 -071 Gary Piehl 316 Grove St S Hutchinson MN 55350 316 Grove St S 126.84 Promises 9/28/92 5- 0845 -074 Hickler Hutch`iVsqyKMN 55350 845 GroCO St S 132. 1- 480 - 0545 -091 Darwin Maus 545 Hassan St S Hutchinson MN 55350 545 Hassan St S 158.49 Promises 9/25/92 1- 480 - 0840 -011 Sayles Walradth 840 Hassan St S Hutchinson MN 55350 840 Hassan St S 137.17 1- 570 - 0016 -004 Sam Poshek 16 Jefferson St S Hutchinson MN 55350 16 Jefferson St S 209.16 1- 680 - 0016 -072 Pizza Garden P 0 Box 361 Hutchinson MN 55350 16 Main St N 562.48 1- 680 - 0206 -071 Elliotts Eatery 206 Main St N Hutchinson MN 55350 206 Main St N 384.92 1- 685 - 0556 -082 Judy Kopesky Box 606 Hutchinson MN 55350 556 Main St S 214.50 1-68 -0605- 1 Alton i and 605 F �St S Hutc nso MN 605, in St 162.16 y 9 C�� Z 55350 • • • C - ry 1 P T"opOS 4 9 4d /ahe- e Co &c o�r5 . Tke aw IH Y e //�w w(�� NXpPriPKCC • Gt / r r/ S • 9 --k STREET INDEX — t e l F E 'a � \ x U C II £ �V L L 5 N �FRI DAY 11 A— a , M I > I 1 • w ; E U I Gs., CAr l P C P v x ] Ain /t ml - P P P b n A I £ IY PAR ] I d aq H E 1811[ P F •.f / � / fir SLS - F..` F G EF wFPNcsgar ' c s 1 L o 1 1 0 l_ A tE __ N ] 5 li A 5 E 11 dA S€ _. _ H 1 E A SVI Fv �,• I. C 3 V p A s .. G i I A NE P E S .. .. G a £ A SE A- SC .. IL fA .... ... N IIAa N11 .... p 2 G 5. JEPI SW _. II l iHA IE H __ II nAn NW - G Z nAVa NE ... II - . -a•ne G ' •SE .... IIJ ¢h All NE N .. :f _ e l Ara EIV G •A _.... G A NW 11 3 A'.NE - ..... I 1 PHAVe NE Maps & Information Available Thru Your Chamber of Commerce son, MN al i10 1 _ 0 L0 ti IN a F7 � I% a HAA ED . {� � \� ul :fILOCI I YGGIIbdI 1 1'arl reV m al City of September 17, 1992 TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Committee of Marlin Torgerson, John Mlinar, Gary Plotz SUBJECT: Refuse Service for Month of October, 1992 The committee met with Galen Witte, Witte Sanitation, at 5:30 to 6:15 P.M. Then the committee met with Chris Boatwright and their accountant of Aagard West from 6:15 to 7:00 P.M. In summary, Mr. Witte was not very interested in refuse service for the month of October mainly because he anticipated losing his employees at the end of September. Secondly, he voiced concern about the amount of refuse, including miscellaneous large items, that may be picked up in the month of October. We talked about making an adjustment for the additional potential volume of material; however, basically he was concerned about his lack of manpower. Regarding Aagard West, the committee attempted to negotiate them down to a reasonable monthly figure. Aagard started at Junker's interim bid (approximately $17 /month). The Witte bid was $12.95 /Mo. /Unit. After much discussion, Aagard's best offer was: > $15.75 /Mo. /Unit • City would bid /proposal out miscellaneous containers (park, street, wastewater, police, etc.) for service beginning October 1, 1992 • City would be responsible for cost to dispose of white goods, hard goods, or mattresses that have special and separate charges at the landfill • All other services would remain the same as present (ie., leaves /compost pickup, back yard service) I contacted Mr. Witte and offered him the same deal. On Monday morning I visited with him again at the County Waste Management meeting. After he discussed the possibility with his employees at a Friday night employee picnic, his response was "thank you, but no." City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Pn ted 0 ri n'coded rap,- I Aagard West needs a commitment to gear up. It appears they will secure a second packer -truck possibly from Kubasch, plus begin hiring some employees. They would like some sort of decision one way or the other. McLeod County Landfill has offered not to charge for items in the second listing above as a measure of goodwill for the month of October. Both parties were aware of this subsequent to our committee meeting. cc: Chris Boatwright, Aagard West /mjs • 0 V 1 h 1 ' 1 I r • HUTCHINSON MALL CITY OF HUTCHINSON MINNFSO TA PROPERTY __. ASSESSMENT ROLI NO COMPIt. ED BY J RODFHFRG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LEITIN]N). 6, PROJECT N) x710 COMPUILIIBY: J. ROWHERG ASSESSMENT CENTURYAVENUI, FROMBOSTON TREFI IUSUNSI: 151 NEEf CNECKED By CAL RICE SIORM5EWER,SANITARYSFWER. WATERMAIN, SEWER6 WAtEHJEHVICLS .GHADINO,GRAVELBASt, PAGE 1 OF 4 CURB 6 CU TTER, BITUMINOUS BASE. BITUMINOUS SURFACING 6 APPURTENANCES ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTYOWNFR ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO FRONTAOF 01 12- 11630 -01 -0040 DFVELDPERS DIVERSIFIED 34555 CHAGRIN BLVD. 23 400 00211 MORFI AND HILLS, OR 44022 HU WHINSON MALL 1 2 02 12 116- 3601 -0050 MCDONALD'S CORPORATION P 0 BOX 86207 AMF O'HARE AIRPORT 23400.0030 CHICAGO, It 60068 HUTCHINSON MALL 2 2 '.. W 121163"1 -0060 1ORINE I WFRPRISES 1625 OAKWOOD 23 400.0040 NEW ULM, MN 58073 HUTCHINSON MALL 3 2 W 12 11630-01 -0090 NOUN RIVER MALL ASSN. 31W WEST BIG BEAVER ROAD 23400.0060 TROY, MICHIGAN 46084 HUTCHINSON MALL 6 2 05 121163"1 -0100 THOMAS B KATHI FEN LUDOWESE W230'OF LOT 5, Wt 15.70' OF 925 THOMAS AVENUE OUTLOT A. OUTLOT B, 23.4000070 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 HUTCHINSON MALL 1.70AGRES 08 COBORN'S, INC 1445E HWY 23, Pc) BOX 6146 Sr CLOUD. MN MW( HUICHINSONMALLPI_AT 2 1 1 07 COHORNS, INC. 1445 E HWY. 23, P 0 BOX 5146 ST CLOUD, MN 511302 HUTCHINSON MALL PLAT 2 2 1 Be COBURN'S. IN; 1445 E HWY 23, P 0 BOX 6146 BE CLOUD, MN 56302 HUTCHINSON MALL PLAT 2 3 1 SUBTOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO 276 V 1 h 1 ' 1 I 0 426 0.010 0.009 0 314 0.008 0 215 0.008 0 008 $23,79270 $555.90 $500.31 $17,455.39 $444.72 $11,951.94 $44.72 $44472 $55,59042 r • HUTCHINSON MALL PROPERTY __. $55,590.42 NUMBER OI YLARS SPREAD: 10 i UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TOTAL AND STREET CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT 0 426 0.010 0.009 0 314 0.008 0 215 0.008 0 008 $23,79270 $555.90 $500.31 $17,455.39 $444.72 $11,951.94 $44.72 $44472 $55,59042 CITY OF HU I CHINSON, MINNF'SOTA ASSESSMENT ROIL NO 276 1 - SANITARY SEWER $2150 COMPILED BY J. RODEBERG LETTING NO. 6, PROJECT NO 9[ W 2 -SEWER SERVICE $1,51130 COMPUTED BY J RODFBFRG CENTURY AVENUE FROM BOSTON STREET TOHUNSEI STREET 3 -WAI ERMAIN $22.34 CHECKED BY CAL RICE 51 ORM SEWER, SANII ANY SEWER, WATERMAIN, SEWER 6 WATER SLRVICLS, GRADING. GRAVEL BASE, 4- WATER SERVICE $685.10 NUMBER OF YEARS SPRFAU. 10 - CURB 6 GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING 6 APPURTENANCES 5 - STORM SLW ER $65.76 PAGE 2 OF 4 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PART OF SEC. 12 11 &30 ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBLH IOF HIOCK 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO FRONTAGE FRONTAGE EACH FRONTAGE EACH SO. YARD ASSESSMENT 00 12 -11 &3&02 -0040 NORWEST BANK ST II I WATER NATIONAL. 2000 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE 5630 OF NW 114 NE. 1/4 23012.NW STILLWATER, MN 55082 SECTION 12 -11 &30 19.09 ACRES 10 12- 11&30- MCLEOD COUNTY AGRICULTURE ASSN. CIO I IM III RICH CITVF NS HANK A TRUST CO. 102 MAIN STREFT SOUTH FAIRGROUNDS 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PART OF SEC. 12 11 &30 SUB-TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO 278 650 $11.915M $000 $14,52100 $0.00 $42,744.00 $71,24000 BW $13,0I5.00 $1.511.30 $14.521.00 $695.10 $42744.00 $73,448A0 $144,686.40 CITY OF HUTCHINSO*ESOTA ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. COMPILED BY J. RODEBERG LETTING NO B. PROJECT NO 82 -10 COMPUTED BY J. RODEBERO CENTURY AVENUE FROM BOSTON STHLI. I I dON5tI 51 RLET CHECKED BY CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATEKMAIN, BFWER 6 WATER SLHVICFB, 6RAU11 GRAVEL BASE. PAGE 3 OF 4 CURB A GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING 6 APPURTENANCES ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO UNITS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TOTAL AND STREET CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT 11 12- 116 - 30-08-0010 MCCORMICK PROPERTIES II I 23316.0010 STEWART. MN 55365 PADEN FIRST ADDII IUN 1 1 1 $3,144.26 $3,744.28 12 12- 11&3600 -WW HERREN FURNITURE, INC. P 0. BOX 1225 LOT 2 EX F62.5' 6 ALL OF LOT 3, 23.316.W20 ST. CLOUD, MN 56301 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 1 0.5 $1,07214 $1,872.14 13 12 -11 6-3608-0030 ERICKSON OIL PRODUCTS 1231 INDUSTRIAL ROAD 182 5' OF I OF 2, 23.318.0030 HUDSON, WI 64016 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 1 1.5 $561642 $5,61642 14 121163608-0040 HUTCH MOTEL PARTNERS C/O REKSTAD RESOURCES, INC. 53W NO LEXINGTON AVENUE LOTS 1 A 6, 23.316 W40 SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 PADEN FIRST ADOI NON 2 2 57,468.56 $7,488.56 15 12- 118-36060050 SI ATE OF MINNESOTA- INTRUST C/O ED IDE 83611TH ST. E. 23.3180050 GLENCOE, MN 55336 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 2 2 1 $3,74424 $3,744.28 16 12- 11630060080 STATE OF MINNESOTA- IN TRUST CIO ED IDE 83611THST E. 23 318.0060 GLENCOE, MN 55336 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 3 2 1 $3.74426 $3,744.28 17 12- 116 - 36080070 STATE OF MINNESOTA INTRUST C/O ED IDE 82011TH ST E 23.316,W70 GLENCOE, MN 55336 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 4 2 1 $3,744.26 $3,744.26 18 12- 11836080080 STATEOFMINNESOTA- INTRUST c/o ED IDE 62011 TH ST F. 23.318.0080 GLENCOE, MN 55338 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 5 2 1 $3,74420 $3,744.28 r PER UNIT COST $3,74 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD. 10 *PSOTA CITY OF HUTCHINSON ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. [ COMPILED BY. J RODFHFRG LETTING NO. 6, PROJFCT NO IB COMPUTEDBY. J. ROOEBERG CENTURYAVENUE FROM HOSIONSIRLL. I IUSUNSLI t,11iLLI CHECKED BY: CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, SEWER A WATER SI.RVICLS, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, PAGE 4 OF 4 CURB A GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING A APPURTENANCES ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER l01 BI t -K NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO UNITS 19 1211 &30-0&0100 WORD OF LIFE MINISTRIES ING P 0 BOX 595 LOT 1 FX N173 15' OF E230', 23 316 0090 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 3 4 20 1211 &3 &0 &0110 1 A B PROPERNES 20732 BELLE LAKE ROAD N173. 15' OF E230' OF LOT 1. 23.318.0100 HUTCHINSON. MN 55350 PADEN FIRST ADDITION 3 1 4 SUB-TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO 278 TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROI I. NO 270 PER UNIT COST $3,740 NUMBER OF YLARS SPREAD: 10 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TOTAL AND STREET CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT $14 977.12 $14,977.12 $3,744.28 $3,744.26 $52.419.92 $252,696.74 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION DECLARING •y TO BE ASSESSED A11F ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. LETTING NO. 6 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 324,727.80 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 71,440.12 , so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 396,168.00 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF H[TPCHINSON, MIN)UMOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $ 143,471.26 , and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $ 252,696.74 . 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment • resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 0 9 -F- RESOLUTION NO. 9804 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 278 LETTM NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 92 -10 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 22nd day of September, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHIN.SON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 13th day of October, 1992, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.H. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the • hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid October 30th, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 9-F- PUBLICATION NO. NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 278 ILTMIG NO. 6, PROJECT NOS. 92 -10 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 8:00 P.H. on the 13th day of October, 1992, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 30th, 1992. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 5.25 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 30th, 1992. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. • 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. PUBLICATION NO. PAGE 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. • Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29TH, 1992 AND TUESDAY, OCTOBER 6TH, 1992. E • 0 0 Cl TY OF HUTCI IINSON, MINNFSOTA ASSN SSMI NI W)II NO 281 1 SANI IARY SEWL14 $1,80504 COMPILED BY'. J. HOULULRG LE I IING NO 1J, PHOJEC I NO 921)9 2- WATERMAIN $1,059.74 COMPUTED BY. J. RODEBERG HASSE HILT 8I 1RS1 ADDITION 3 -STORM SEWER $2,284.99 CHECKED By CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, SEWER S WATER SERVICE S, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE 4- STREET $3.170.66 CURB &GUTTER. BITUMINOUS BASE. BITUMINOUS SURFACING B APPURTENANCES PAGE i OF 4 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: 10 ACCOUNT CITY PIO NUMBER LOT BLOCK 1 2 3 4 TOTAL NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 02- 118 -30-09- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 21 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 1 1 $180504 $1,65974 $2,284.99 $3,17088 $0.00 $8,92043 02 02- 11830-09- BF I IL_R BUII T HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILL S FIRST ADDITION 2 1 $180504 $1.659.74 $.^ ^,28499 $3,17088 $0.00 $8,920.43 03 02- 11630 -09 - BETTER BUII I HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 140 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 3 1 $1805.04 $1859.74 $2,284.89 $3,170.66 $0.00 $8,920.43 04 02- 118-30-09- BET TER BUILT HOMES. INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CFO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HIL LS FIRS I ADDITION 4 1 $180504 $1.65914 $2,28499 $3.17088 $000 $8.92043 05 02- 118 -30 -09- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. CJO GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE IUL LS FIRST ADDH ION S 1 $1,805.04 $1859.74 $2,281.99 $3,11088 $0.00 $8,820.43 00 02 -01830-09- BE FIER BUILT HOMES. INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 7401 AKEWOOO DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 8 1 $1,00504 $1,659.74 $2284.99 $3.170.86 $0.00 $8,920.43 07 02- 110 -30-09- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE. 1111 LS FIRS I AUDI NON / 1 $180504 $1 659 74 $2.284 99 $3,110.66 $0.00 $8820.43 1 T ,�\ 1 0 • • CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ASSESSMENT POI I NO 281 1. SANITARY SEWER $1,805.04 COMPILED BY J. RODEBERG LETTING NO 13, PROJEC I NO 92 19 2- WAIERMAIN $1,659.74 COMPUTED BY J. RODEBERG HASSE HII IS I INS I ADDI PION 3STORM SEWER $2,284.99 CHECKED RY: CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN, SEWER 8 WATER SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE 4-STREET $3,170.06 CURB 8 GUTTER. BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING &APPURTENANCES PAGE 2 OF 4 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: 10 ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER 101 MOCK 1 2 3 4 TOTAL NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO CREDITS ASSESSMENT 08 02- 116-30{19- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE. CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST AUDI ION B 1 $1,00504 $1859.74 $2,28499 $3,170.66 $0.00 $8,92048 09 02118 -30-09- BETTER HUR T HOMES, INC. CIO GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILTS FIRST ADDITION 9 1 $1,805.04 $1,659.74 $2,2M 99 $3,170.66 $0.00 $8,92013 10 02 116 -30-09- BE TIER BUR T HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 1 2 $1,80504 $1659.74 $2,284.99 $3,170.66 $000 $8,920.43 11 02-118 -30-09- BET 7 ER BUIL T HOMES, INC. CIO GARY HASSE, CEO 140 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23. HUICHINSON,MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRS T AUDITION 2 2 $1B05M $105914 $2,284.99 $3,17066 $0.00 $8,920.43 12 02 118 -30-09- BETTER BUII T HOMES, INC. CIO GARY HASSE. CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 3 2 $1.80504 $1,659.74 $2.261.99 $3,170.66 $0.00 $$920.43 13 02- 118-30-09- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. CIO GARY HASSE, CEO 740 LAKF W OOD DRIVE 23. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 4 2 $1,605.04 $1859.74 $2,284.99 $3,170.08 $0.00 $6,920.43 14 02- 116 -30 -09- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE. CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23 . HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRS I AUDI I ION 5 2 $1805.M $185974 $2,284.99 $3,17088 $0.00 $8,920.43 3 4 TOTAL CREDITS ASSESSMENT 23. HUTCHINSON,MN 55350 CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ASSESSMFNTROII NO 4�FI COMPILEDBY. J RODLBENG LETTINGNO. I3.PH()JLCI NO 0210 COMPUTED BY'. J . RODEBERG HASSE HILLS I I H S T ADDITION CHECKED BY. CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATFR"N. SEWER & WATER SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE HE TIER RIM T /TOMES ING CURB & GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING & APPUR PENANCES PAGE 3 OF 4 ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER (Of RIOCK 1 2 NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO 15 02 116-30-M BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY HASSE, CEO 7401AKFWOOD DRIVE 3 4 TOTAL CREDITS ASSESSMENT 23. HUTCHINSON,MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRS F ADDITION 8 2 $1805 U4 $1650.74 $2,2&4.% $3,170.66 $0.00 $8,020.43 16 02- 11811(14A HE TIER RIM T /TOMES ING C/O GARY HASSE CFO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 1 2 $180504 $1,850.74 $2,28480 $3.17088 $0.00 $8,020.43 17 02- 1163409- BETTER BUILT HOMES, INC. C/O GARY IIASSE. CEO 740 LAKEWOOD DRIVE 23, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 HASSE HILLS FIRST ADDITION 8 2 $1,805.04 $1,650.74 $2,281.00 $3,170.66 $0.00 $8,020.43 SUB TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 281 $151,847.31 n I SANITARY SEWFR $1805.04 2 WAILRMAIN $1,859.74 3-STORM SEWER $2,284.00 4- STREET $3.170.88 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: 10 9 . CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ASSESSMT NI Rini w1 :u1 COMPILEU BY. J. RODEBERG LETTING NO 13, 1'HUJI C I No O2 09 COMPUTED BY J. RODLBLRG HASSE HILLS I IR5I ALTA I ION CHECKED BY CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER. WATERMAIN, SEWI 11 n WATER SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE 5 -STORM SEWER LATERAL CURB 8 GUT i ER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING 8 APPURTENANCES PAGE 4 OF 4 10 ACCOUNT CITYPIDNUMBER 107 BLOCK 1 2 NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO NO n I SANITARY 5LWEI2 TRUNK $4,66162 2 -SANI IA14Y BLWLII LA IERAI $3,398.92 3- WATERMAIN LATERAL $3,501,40 4-STORM SEWER TRUNK $11991.07 5 -STORM SEWER LATERAL $3.702.82 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: 10 3 4 5 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 18 02- 11630 -09-0001 I ORETTA MCDONALD 1555 MCDONALD DRIVE DEFERRED HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 TRACT IN SEC. 2- 116 -30 $1881.82 $3,398.92 $3,501.40 $11.9918] $3,70282 $27,255.83 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO 281 $178.90314 RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION DECLARIM COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERIM PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSHENT ROLL NO. LETTING • PROJECT NO. WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Hasse Hills First Addition (Located North of McDonald Drive and West and Adjacent to McDonald's Sixth Addition) by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 146,641.92 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 32,261.22 , so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 178,903.14 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $ 178,903.14 . 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of • 5_25 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • / —/ ' RESOLUTION NO. 9:•. RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARDK7 ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSHENT LETTING PROJECT WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 22nd day of September, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Hasse Hills First Addition (Located North of McDonald Drive and West and Adjacent to McDonald's Sixth Addition) by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF H T!'CHINSON, M33EN ,SOTA: 1. The hearing on such proposed assessment is hereby waived in accordance with the attached "Petition for Local Improvement" and "Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal ". 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 30th, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator s 9 -/Z,7 RESOLUTION NO. 9807 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 281 LETTING NO. 13, PROJECT NO. 92 -19 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Hasse Hills First Addition (Located North of McDonald Drive and West and Adjacent to McDonald's Sixth Addition) by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances;and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1st, 1992, until the 31st day of December, 1993. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 30th day of October, 1992; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor 0 City Administrator RESOLTTTION NO. 9808 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT LETTING NO. 13 PROJECT NO. 92 -19 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of Hasse Hills First Addition (Located North of McDonald Drive and West and Adjacent to McDonald's Sixth Addition) by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: BIDDER AMOUNT BID Juul Contracting Company, Hutchinson, MN $146,641.92 RP Utilities, Annandale, MN $158,412.00 Duininck Bros., Co., Prinsburg, MN $173,479.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson, • Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 0 9 -G I M E M O R A N D U M September 18, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Airport Appraisal We have completed the appraisals for acquisition of property required for the construction of the airport improvements. We currently are having a Review Appraiser look at the appraisals, as required by the FAA. We have talked with MnDOT and the Fair Association about trying to purchase the remainder of the Fair property south of CSAH 8, but MnDOT noted that the property probably will not meet their criteria for purchase. I propose that we complete an appraisal of this property, by Dave . Lorence who completed our other appraisals, at a cost not to exceed $350. We contend that this is an uneconomical remnant due to the highway setback, wetland location and building limitation due to the airport. I would appreciate a motion approving the appraisal. <Jj> City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Prin fed on recgded paper - Kornglebel Architecture Library Square 45 Washington Avenue East Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 612/587 -2483 FAX(612)587 -6336 • September 22, 1992 Mr. John Rodeberg City Engineer 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Hutchinson Telephone Company Dear Mr. Rodeberg: Per our conversation Telephone Company, I along the east side lot. Approximately of last week and c request approval t of Franklin Street nine spaces will be n the behalf of the Hutchinson o remove the diagonal parking adjacent to the existing parking eliminated. With the closing of the Red Owl Store, a high concentration of parking in this area is no longer.necessary. We propose to eliminate all diagonal parking south of the west drive (see attached plan) and extend the boulevard with trees and grass. This proposal would better define the extents of this private lot and discourage unnecessary traffic cutting through from Main Street to residential areas to the west. Thank you for your considerations on this project. Sincerely, A James Haugen, AIA JH:dh cc: Walt Clay enc. iz riz 0 �J oaf.. 0 LhSfLD Cr K d b o , w i s z _ LrfPn�i r � I Fo o Ito alA h rn X opC ulhl� Ili /F( (a a�{I� - 4 I /t �i _+�J� �«rss c s►{ct I h1. i zss' 6t t, f J i ;J/sir. bl OM1 OJS T-1OA _ i THIRD A -- —55.5 (tC�O✓C fry N h e.1, a a r6 {f (gru cea) L to' I , �( I I rllu/ �r� c J j tell G' �f rlJcC ;J/sir. C DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TOM DAGGETT, HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On August 28, 1992, Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Manufacturing, submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to construct a 40' x 80' storage rack located at Hutchinson Manufacturing, located at 720 Hwy 7 West. A public hearing was held at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 15, 1992, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request at that time. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request be granted as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, Clint Gruett, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - T - Printed on wcvcicd parer - / 9 � fE & .< ( 6.T U'y v Apy // ,pe!'N --- ,,,,p NQ,' L ^� - NB9 °5100 E 249 25' a'75 L ' 90 I I SP ' ,•": 109 r , ' •✓ +` O u � r r2' PROPOSED n I�BUILDI NG ai o s , , " + to ,'t , ♦ m `\\ n„lw. +• • o •t n, , ^ EXISTING BLDG lP L se• , e ,• .... ..e, r.r. ".. 1 r O — 3io n•' 1>:° a IN C /OPOSE�%D 2i0 ' /SO /u Ar "' N K .�. EXISTING BUILDING EXIST. - ` BLDG g r •!- - �I I PROPOSED BUILDING- '•, �•, `� nep•ve nse. a ... S. 2d x. I I- _GF N79.27.OZ E B62' _- -� ___� ;,.n�^`° t•'�� _ `N ♦,/ � All llvit part of th, wrcL 77 - ,in, feet nt Ihn ..mlltr.tst "oii, of thr SOUIIn•r of Set 1 Inn lb lown.hlp Ili u, 1. ul 'nartrr .,.0th, Nnn.:r r .I nI t 1'r in.ipal •:rridi. \n. m mcn- surc ,I ut.: lhr nnrt •, ling- ••I cn id .`nul •� lu, :1 �:I••r o uf ( tip, lr �uurhen•:t 0 I .. 1'•,nrl nr, Ivtn.: nnrth .,f lhi 'u •1 ..:,. nl 1 Nnil, , lu e• lo:rt I north. -. i" loot 11... .,, I Lh•• 'e't nl 1,, vrcl ..�'^ r•••I .,rn nrrd .11 w, IU- u'trlh nrl wrc[ liurx , ul N"1 Snuttu•anl l 011nrl•'r nl I& Alen that part of Ih•' rncl al., pl' ICCL nl tit' >nuthw•.!et Quarter of the Semth.•ast Onartef If 3-11.1 `rction I,. Icin. unrthrrly of I:,r I'nr;nrr t..ht of ..,v of thr Yinnrcnta I.00tt•rn XAtlwav fnmprmv. Iz. •lit th.• Ito, -th W-.7n fprl t1wreof as measured atom tit,- Cast line If Said - nuthwrer "uarl Cr nl 1110 `onlhr+, +l Nlarl.•r, 1 herCla ccrt ifv that Ihf. cunt .ns prrinrr-0 1•: v nr nvlr,- •n .li f0ct <nlx.l'ci Sinn and that 1 rtr n dal+. I.ieert "'I 1 -1IV1 :•uNrr'n' nn l• i- Ih. ,. nt Ilt� Y:,I•• ..1 nln, 1 M .,L _. 6, I lard I•ell iu••n. Llrnn.r. No. 'h•!h. Apr i1:2. i —ll. .mB NO 97n,i Rnnf 1•rc unr.1 _ _ RESOLUTION NO. 9798 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO CONSTRUCT A 40' R 80' STORAGE RACK LOCATED AT • HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING, 720 HWY 7 WEST BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Mr. Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg., has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct a 40' x 80' storage rack located at 720 Hwy 7 West with the following legal description: Legal description: Commencing at a point on the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 30 West, 378 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence East on said North line 100 feet; thence South on a line parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, 345.7 feet; thence West on a line parallel with the North line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter 100 feet; thence North on a line parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, 345.7 feet to the point of beginning. Commencing at a point 478 feet East and 345.7 feet South of the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 30 West, thence continuing South on a line parallel with the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter to the North right of way line of the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad (formerly the Minnesota Western Railway Company); thence Westerly along said right of way line approximately 358 feet to a point 126 feet East of the West line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence North to a point 345.7 feet South of the North line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence East 352 feet to the point of beginning. All that part of the East 300 feet of the West 778 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Thirty -six (36) in Township One Hundred Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West, as measured along or parallel with the North line of said Southeast Quarter of Southeast Quarter, lying Northerly of the right -of -way of the Minneapolis Industrial Railroad (formerly Minnesota Western Railroad). The East 126.00 feet of the West 378.00 feet of the North 345.70 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section Thirty -Six (36) in Township One Hundred and Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the • Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 9s 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted based on the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • Paul L. Ackland Mayor E r DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED IN CASA ADDITION REQUESTED BY BARRY BARTON Pursuant to Section 5.972 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planing commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for vacation of utility easements located in CASA ADDITION. HISTORY On August 27, 1992, Barry Barton, submitted a petition for the vacation of a utility easements located in CASA ADDITION. The . public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 15, 1992, at which time there were no neighboring property objecting to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 2, 1992 and Tuesday, September 8, 1992. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the vacation be granted based on the findings set forth above subject to staff recommendations to verify ownership of the East 208' of Lot 1, Casa Addition. Respectfully Submitted, Clint Gruett, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission S City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recoiled paper- 9 -x! 0 0 0 a.cn „rr•.vIC yr avnecr ror oE•nnr vn•srvrN LOTS I AND 2. BLOCK 1, CApA AUDI IION i '. EXCEPT THE WEST 125.00 FEET OF SAID LOT L TEXAS AVENUE Q m -'. -- - -- -=--- -`_-- L, oa. -# ,e' East 207.97 oN4iru(, .&No ur L"I CaSEMENr: 62 — o •em ' U �W I 66 � N t co 4. co fV M 1 L__s_. i °gyp .•.• .r• -62 _ .. a -- 104.00 �_--- _ - -_ -- �4 `•'c BI iU MINCUS O SURFACE N § •,•J •• I ' 40.2 JaJ .Nf • J .Ils d L 404 20 404 6} ...N.. 20 iI0 B• - .63 F W h J A 27 O 6• O _ v o O _ • I V BVI�aINL I'. d 2 c BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING u Bo i I c� so X20 . n 3 N89 °12'S8'E N.n. X6125 S.im :6123 SUR °SCE 63 - ` " /45.00 -. ,NOUS BITUM .- t .u., \ u J to r 3410 Al' I� p. Ep SEMfNT E 6aE55 it � /` -- \ \\ �` N`A•� pND % r H `v i twGat55' \f 3 6 BENCH MARK /' I heal, 111f.11 ]hot this survey vas prepared av me 26 Top nut of nvdran, Elevation : 1060.04 or under my direct supervision and that lama duly _may y P S ` I L.censed Land San'evor under Id NS of the4ate M Minn wlnvd Peu men, License No 9626 U ?q 4.• Bn rtpruory 13, 1992 Q sco le ul eel / i '. 64 I�1 • r00 Q m -'. -- .. -62_ .. %'.\l 62 . ? �W t �l t /' I heal, 111f.11 ]hot this survey vas prepared av me 26 Top nut of nvdran, Elevation : 1060.04 or under my direct supervision and that lama duly _may y P S ` I L.censed Land San'evor under Id NS of the4ate M Minn wlnvd Peu men, License No 9626 U ?q 4.• Bn rtpruory 13, 1992 Q sco le ul eel / ra DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ROGER STEARNS, STEARNSWOOD Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On August 28, 1992, Roger Stearns, Stearnswood, submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to construct a 26' x 30' covered staging area for outside storage located at Stearnswood. A public hearing was held at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 15, 1992, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request at that time. submitted and the appropriate fee 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was paid. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request be granted as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, Clint Gruett, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -1975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -1242 9- L. N I I )' V y. H n ?N✓ 9cTVt��s.1 yLf4� e 1 ° f tK L � 1 q7l ° /LLL P al I'NLL q Ft — ✓ /C <TLD J�<LLJ � � brr✓ ` —L • •L .�4 ur�1 urPL ur �l ) �f 1 K yNY4sLLr J.'CD I 7� A t � ` 1 i ; a. L a paEf� 1 4 ° 'f a9' �j• Acef)J 'I is y0L S + � p �yep yen j" yr,f A LLN� f ^iA 1 7 .. ■ 0 0 0 e . . . • .• it Mo Rm Y . ' R II ' ��'�• . ` Orem L90 0 TT • � 100 JG. PT LIMN. TO VNFD iQoY!•'_ _. _ N �I f J � a e r P. A a 0 •. • it I l nw ExisTiN� X l T/ A /G �TC�eri15 ��c5ot� RESOLUTION NO. 9799 • RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO CONSTRUCT A 26' X 30' STORAGE AREA LOCATED AT STEARNSWOOD, 320 THIRD AVE N.W. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Mr. Roger Stearns, Stearnswood, has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct a 26' x 30' covered staging area for outside storage located at Stearnswood, 320 Third Ave NW, with the following legal description: North half, Hutchinson, Block 26, Lots 1, 2, 3, and parts of 4, 5, 6, norht of railroad right -of -way and West half of vacated Greenleaf Street and vacated alley. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted based on the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator L Paul L. Ackland Mayor 9 -4 a C DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PETER HOEGER, 215 WASHINGTON AVE WEST FOR EXISTING NONCONFORMING DRIVEWAY AND TO CONSTRUCT A 16' X 26' GARAGE Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On August 31, 1992, Peter Hoeger submitted an application for a variance to reduce setback for nonconforming existing driveway and to reduce sideyard setback 2' from 6' to 4' to construct a 16'x26' garage located at 215 Washington Ave. A hearing was held at the • regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 15, 1992, at which time there was no one present objecting to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be granted as set forth above for the driveway variance and the garage variance be denied. Respectfully submitted, Clint Gruett, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Printed on recycled paper- ' I IV C DATE: September 16, 1992 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEANETTE HARRIS TO MOVE A 1972 MOBILE HOME TO MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On August 31, 1992, Jeanette Harris, submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow her to move a 1972 Ritz Craft • trailer home unto property located at McDonalds Trailer Court. A Public hearing was held at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 15, 1992, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request at that time. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request be granted as set forth above subject to meeting the requirements by staff of the Life Safety Code Issues as follows, 1) Egress windows in all bedrooms 2) Interconnected smoke detectors 3) Verify all appliances, plumbing, electrical, etc. to be brought to present day code and 4) Verify double glaze windows. Respectfully submitted, Clint Gruett, Chairman City Hall Parlffukr&I V61V Planning CommFa4&rdkpartment 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 111 - Printrd o, mc,, r a.v.. 0 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 2, 1992 TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Marka, and M. Hensen SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY JEANETTE HARRIS, TO MOVE A 1972 RITZ CRAFT MOBILE HOME UNTO PROPERTY LOCATED IN MCDONALD'S TRAILER COURT The planning staff recommends approval of the request subject to providing the following: • - Egress windows in all bedrooms - Interconnected smoke detectors - Verify all appliances, plumbing, electrical, etc. to be brought to present day code - Verify double glaze windows is 9-� RESOLUTION NO. 9800 • RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO MOVE A 1972 RITZCRAFT TRAILER HOME INTO MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Ms Jeanette Harris, has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to move a 1972 Ritz Craft trailer home unto property located in McDonalds Trailer Court. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent . of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted based on the findings set forth above subject to meeting Life Safety Code Issues being met as required by staff. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator u Paul L. Ackland Mayor /— Y C. H E H 0 R A N D U H DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF "SIOUX HILLS NO. 2" SUBMITTED BY SKIP QUADS, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS The Hutchinson Planning Commission has no objection to the final . plat and recommends certified installers and inspectors review the septic systems and a subdivision agreement be recorded with the plat. • City Hall Parks fr Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Pnn tCd nn 1CVC1CA prtrcr - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 NU4 cd 5.<.35- t 3 S IOUX H I L L S N cot �nv Me � P in �3: w o b 0 1 •^ 1 m - i �¢ t ' N to ^ D a UNFLATTEV i f 1 0 •0- �660�i\ d � J \� / in feet ' o% / A \ S89 WE 381.07 sN ( r S y'S TO 1 b / R 150.00 -1 150.00 R al.O �k I Cn I \so (P I .J to. s +,j jE b I I - 1 \ stn = , • �\ i ii °z l i � � \ s Gov't Lot B _ �J• �Ny �H� I C' B L Q K ' I t� Gov't Lor 7 -.. 6\ 1 N N -.J g �Bj '` A f I 2 , p--3 . �w g a f � nl 44�vv e e . ��p•a�ma �• r < ? to 1-,o I-w �'? n• w 9. JfO S 78.40 s 150.00 150.00 188.65 9 ^ ;tm are snoln rnl d `6l ?2 - S 602 38 . 9, a 196 TH ROAD g 00. 150.00 150.00 c i m .. Io 4 ?)• I I -� _ -__ 20 n mnumm fo ' 01 U. I I g I I I menu ors Horn on roe mop m " . LI B L ( G K 2 �m 4 j O I Iy P _TN.: �ncn by 14 into iron Dipe mt. - - ^M _ - J W I 0 OI O O0q I1 • 269.24 �J ? r License No 9626. a N 1 fv 2 p, N 3 N n I N ,pl IN N,N I O �a9 I NI PYl a. c4t und N _ j • I III .. ' N NC 7 O to IO I l0 $ In X N Tine is 0'26- nave n 1p ...r „ 5 O 37'26- W W I I I f I m m _0 o-I 'N Z rpL - -- -I I - -_ _� I _j C O - 150.00 150.00 150.00 2'57.70 r � I Na9 773.84 I '1 Norm lin6 of 10'16 720.00 feet of Gov't Lot 7, Sec 35, T. 117 N., R 3O WY 1 Y v� t ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Victor E. Schmidt and Harriet E. Schmidt, husband and wife, and that Verona �idt, a widow, fee owners, and Howard Paul -:rty situated in the County of McLeod, State Minnesota, L contract purchaser, of the following described =Ic part of Government Lots 7 and 8 of Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian scribed as follows: Commencing at the north quarter corner of said Section 35; thence South 0 degrees 37minutes seconds West, assumed bearing, along the north -south quarter line of said Section 35 a distance of 677.24 feet; Dance South 28 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds East 401.96 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described ^nce South 28 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds East 163.67 feet; thence South 89 degrees 37 minutes 58 seconds East I feet to the westerly line of SIOUX HILLS, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence southeasterly and �� l l tangentialacurve to the west the having a 558 feet M a i central the n ce ang Leuofe 7ldegrees 34e "rotes OS seconds; thence southerly, tangent to said curve, 254.18 feet to the intersection with the north line the south 720.00 feet of said Government Lot 7; thence westerly, along said north line, 773.84 feet; thence North leerees 22 minutes 02 seconds East 414.71 feet; thence northwesterly 85.28 feet along a curve not tangential with - last described line, said curve is concave to the northeast, has a radius of 233.00 feet, a central angle of degrees 57 minutes 55 seconds and the chord of said curve is 84.78 feet in length and bears North 39 degrees minutes 34 seconds West; thence North 28 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds west, tangent to said curve, 248.08 feet; rte North 41 •Leo..•. _t.......,. " .____�_ - - I _ C M E M O R A N D U M DATE, September 16, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY MIKE ROSE (2 MILE RADIUS) ACOMA TWP The Hutchinson Planning Commission has no objection to the sketch Plan and recommends certified installers and inspectors review the septic systems. Also, owner of the property must verify compliance . with the Shoreland Ordinance and recertify finished floor elevations at 1,046.5'. • City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9- 7V c 3 t • 1e L 2 V-- -�L i IP.G !1 q - -P /••1 V V t�Lrf TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST •Efx S:N Co' SMALL TIACT OWNE[S of w.(r a... .fxr ve }cr v... nL irfr ww. .co x r w.• •Lw' G�.•ti4- . f r} 1} f1 • K. : yh. •rr f r t �� • i n. u.�w L} r . • r�•w. Y. a fJ• �. �••�r4 i _ q - -P /••1 V V t�Lrf TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST •Efx S:N Co' CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ELSIE PRIEVE • PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF PROPOSED PLAT J North-souls 1/4 line of Sec. 35 l North Ilne of south 720.00 feel Doe9 Lot 7, See.35, T117N, R.30W. That part of the south 720.00 feet of Covernment Lot 7, Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the north line of said south 720.00 feet with the north -south quarter line of said Section 35; thence east- erly, along said north line, 758.65 feet to the ppoint of beginning of the land to be described; thence southerly, deflecting to the right 93 degrees 39 minutes 51 seconds, 149.16 feet; thence southerly 201.18 feet along a tangential curve con- cave to the east, having a radius of 5518.16 feet and a central angle of 2 degrees 05 minutes 20 seconds; thence southerly, tangent to said curve, 275.16 feet; thence southerly 97.24 feet along a tangential curve concave to the vent, having a ra- dlus of 304.37 feet and a central angle of 18 degrees 18 minutes 15 seconds, to a point on the south line of said Government Lot 7, said point being 717.56 feet east of the center of said Section 35; thence easterly, along said south line, to the westerly shore line of Campbell's Lake; thence north- erly, along said shore line, to m as 1 vi 1 e ; I LOT 11 1 1.12 ACRIES f f 7 1 I 1 a I r ' m 10, V •O ICr I X '_' 33 LOT 2 1 1.12 ACgES ' cn J e0 77 - 1� � ?iaN 1 I For m „ I � .- I x ° LOT 3 1.12 ACRf S S] I I_ y o, n: I Ba 7l�� V � a the intersection with the north ;n Line of said south 720.00 feet ^ M C of Government Lot 7; thence ;-'M westerly, along said north Lille, m,°m to the point of beginning. a ;) I hereby certify that this survey /•/ was prepared by ale or unfler my direct supervision and that L am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. f.h -GwAQ //.CLa-- - �llec� a hen te No. 96 26. January 11, 1992. r Sou In line of Gov'f Lot 7 ' �'/ \f(\ Sec. 35, T. 117, R. 30 ^NWtorner of Kleinkaul's Addlllon / (717.56 ft. east of center of section) W Y la J I T J J W m D_ 2 Cl U • denotes iron monument found a denotes iron monument set (1/2 inch diem. Iron pipe) TOTAL AREA _ 4.45 ACRES AREA EAST OF ROAD : 3.35 ACRES 0 50 100 200 stole in set etLLIKEN Leas /aaf[TINe NUT[NI1130t, Mlllats0T4 JOB N0. 91274 BOOK P121 PAGE ZO I , 331 ]3 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 17, 1992 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "HUEBERT'S SUBDIVISION" SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS The Hutchinson Planning Commission has no objection to the preliminary plat and recommends certified installers and inspectors review the septic systems. Also, owner of the property is to review the need for overhead power line easement. . City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Prrn fed Ott r Cucfed raper - Police Deparhnent 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9 -14114,011 W 3 V 6 O Y U 1F \GE !1 W 7 ACOMA TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST YEERER Co. SMALL TRACT OWNERS 11C • O•.•. K\. YL KI M• K \• 1R I.al p•�• K \I R KI Pte•. K.II 1 • 40v� Ir IW.r0..tY YJI 1 � -.� Il R • )! 0� i � t w.w•.w I! t •. .� IM C w� a! W r tJ• II ♦ •�..�w•w•r. l! a • K�.CV. -1..• �Ir •� tr, I � - ••N� t .NAM l ..i.+. ;! • •�� r e Y r�i..�<r... — i ` I� : iii I — y.. � i l i i • te r..`..- 1 • a a� • Vrr � • =..�� IY = .rr.� RN \ I •�r..� I C � W 7 ACOMA TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST YEERER Co. HUEBERT' S J BENCH MARK` SPIKE IN SOUTH FACE OF POWER POLE ELEVATION = 1079.07 _p OVERHEAD POWER LINET ORTH LINE O NE 114 OF S EC 2 117 N_R_ 30 W C ,` WEST 322.15 SUBDIVI PRELIMINARY P SURFACE ..... 7 -. 316.97 ... N ..Toes - -- . N Lo to N v O Z it I v r W ; ` Z n 4 oZ 9� ` o s Ioeo _ 1 ' O _ N --- ---- LOT I N n N — N M1 `0 e f m BLOCK a , a I O IJ I I O , 20--A MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK LINE I-20 L_ _ a _ - - - - -- J z --- __ ___ _ .. s - - - - - - -J: Bo a W � DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT O a J ` EAST 296.55 ..Toes - -- . N Lo to N v O Z it I v r W ; ` Z n 4 oZ 9� C H E H 0 R A N D U M • DATE: September 17, 1992 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "HUEBERT'S SECOND SUBDIVISION" SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS The Hutchinson Planning Commission has no objection to the preliminary plat and recommends certified installers and inspectors review the septic systems. Also, owner of the property must verify compliance with the Shoreland Ordinance. • City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printcd on recuded parer - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 ,� , 3 S O z I z 1•kE 51 LVNN 1 ACOMA TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST CO. MEEKER SMALL TRACT OWNERS tlf M1tl KNl nt M[I Ow•� K \I IR Ikl Oa• K \I w nKl • PY \ � y � Kel 1 • MO�•� 1 i • N JI 1 ~ -Y 1 IJ• Wr4ww IY fw�•,YV : •,�•v I �+ Ir• � : �.,, ii : er•V 1 •.Y•w'eY• ii • ..r 1 a" �..•�� — 1 :`.� < fry • � . ..ter } ' 1 ; I1.1 1,. 1w 1 I�r.Yn • e+Tw t • 1} t + I. , M f Mme.+ 0.+,i Its � ,... w 1 1 e 4.•.1•r, W 1� ••• n •Y.OY e. •,... v la I 1 r.•r•I..•w4. 1.1.E n= Lµ. •-+.� pp 11 4.�.� � •rr w. O� - C f w•ww� I • , 9w 1, • •ri ,�r� la • IY 1 ACOMA TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST CO. MEEKER HIJEBERT' S SECOND SUBDIVI • PRELIMINARY HARTER OF THE 24 INCH TILE WTLET /6, TOWNSHIP 1"-104T2 111E 5TH PRIN .S fOLLOWS: PLAT 242.Do 5 13• W 28.00' f �• I : R% I i CORNER OF SAID ---- 0 �L+ —; - -'iiH 89 DEGREES J AS SUNED BEARING, ? 5 21'E 42.00'... 1 ''•,'� { r NORTHEAST GUAR '.I OF BEGINNING \)I r THENCE NORTH $B•W 40.00• ams NEST 580.00 0, -1' 58 MINUTES 22 r r r r r r yyY rt NCE SOUTH 15 DCE SOUTH 21 DE O 0 SOUTH S DE- m a 0 /,�, r r r • ' SOUTH 12 DE •�E SOUTH 40 DE .E SOUTH 37 DE' E SOUTH 4 DE- `04fr SOUTH 17 DE :1 SOUTH LINE; ".INUTES ZZ SEC- ? �2 ' ,l. " . 4 ° y � , .. POINT OF BE- 'pg1 e r ° I O 0 0 m n O_ Zna I- .BLOCK o ' �� '• I W .�' �' ♦6 �� ' _, 0T2- _ - - -- -fir ;�' .•, -= r i BUILDING SET BKN LINE - 50.18. ,f �•'�' 1 � •`O as - a o .,.\n.J\ -- _ - -- _ - -- - .. _•____i_..____ —r _ _ e .cr, cur , N89 442.00 GRAVEL SURFACE e r ° I O 0 0 m n O_ Zna C H E M 0 R A N D U H DATE: September 17, 1992 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC. The Hutchinson Planning Commission recommends approval of the request stating it is to include the entire Lot 6. • City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9- -.5 be- lp- 1 i I may. I y I y ! CI Pi n � 1 t s x u� r �— `F TH 7 EAST �-- I j ! a • a i n`� {. IIN�➢ LAN ♦ _ W C: �t • Z 1 ' f • T • • s,. MILITaP y " � DRIVE ! a • y 4 1 a_ q W W G F t 1 • • t 5£CON9 AvENLE 0�5 r M E M O R A N D U M DATE, September 17, 1992 TOs Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY KURT REINER FOR A FEED LOT WITHIN THE 2 MILE RADIUS, HUTCHINSON TWP The Hutchinson Planning Commission is unfavorable to the request noting the property is not large enough to support a feed lot of any size. • City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks £s Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9T Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 <c�� 1 "1 t8 a 102 STATE OF MINNESOTA � NF.Iy � COUNTY OF MCLE OD Z`3Zr'2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County Planning Commission will be held on the 30th day of September, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota. THE PURPOSE OF SAID MEETING is to consider an application for a Conditional Use Permit heretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Kurt Reiner. Said application for a Conditional Use Permit relates to the operation of a confined feetlot exceeding one animal unit per acre. THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Conditional Use is anticipated and situated in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit: That part of the SW¢ of the SE= of Sec 29 in Twp 117N of Range 29W described as • follows, to -wit: Commencing at the SW corner of said SW} of the SE;; thence E, along the S line of said SW of the SE;, 330.00' to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence continuing E'ly, along said S line, 419.00'; thence N'ly parallel with the W line of said SW= of the SE}, 660.00'; thence W'ly, parallel with said S line, 419.00'; thence S'ly, parallel with said W line, 660.00', to the point of beginning. THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in opposition to or support of the proposed Conditional Use. Thereafter, the McLeod County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission. (Continued on reverse) q • DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. r , , Edwin E. Homan McLeod County Zoning Administrator p J r MINUTES fpR Ypup V �p1jM • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION A T ION Tuesday, September 15, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 8:00 p.m. with the following members present: Dean Wood, Craig Lenz, Bill Craig, Roland Ebent and Chairman Gruett. Members Absent: E1Roy Dobratz and Tom Lyke Also Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator and John Rodeberg, City Engineer. 2. MINUTES a Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, August 18, 1992. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TOM DAGGETT, HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:02 p.m. with the reading of publication # 4434 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. The • request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit requested by Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Manufacturing, to allow him to construct a 40' x 80' storage rack located at 720 Hwy 7 West. City Administrator Gary Plotz commented on the request of the storage building to be open on both ends. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the request to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN CASA ADDITION REQUESTED BY BARRY BARTON Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:06 p.m. with the reading of publication #4435 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992, and Tuesday, September 8, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a petition to vacate a utility easement in Casa Addition. City Administrator Plotz commented on the storage • buildings and explained the easements to be vacated. He 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/15/92 • explained the staff recommendation to verify ownership of the property. Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:07 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval provided the developer verify ownership. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ROGER STEARNS, STEARNSWOOD Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:08 p.m. with the reading of publication #4436 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request for a conditional use permit construct a 26' x 30' covered staging area for outside storage located at Stearnswood. City Administrator Gary Plotz commented on the request as an attachment to the present building in and I/C district. Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. • Lenz the hearing closed at 8:09 p.m. Mr. Craig moved to recommend approval of the request to city council. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PETER HOEGER, 215 WASHINGTON AVE WEST FOR NONCONFORMING DRIVEWAY AND TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:10 p.m. with the reading of publication #4437 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a variance requested by Peter Hoeger, 215 Washington for a nonconforming driveway and to construct a 16' x 26' garage. Mr. Plotz explained the request and the hardship of the narrow lot and the existing nonconforming driveway. The planning staff recommends approval of the driveway variance and the owner constructing a 14' garage to maintain a 6' side yard setback. Mr. Hoeger stated it is not possible to build a double garage in the narrow lot. He explained 16' would give extra storage space. City Engineer John Rodeberg • commented on the issue of drainage. Mr. Hoeger stated he will work with the neighbors on the drainage. There was discussion on the existing garage /shed and the age of the a HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • 9/15/92 building. Discussion followed on the narrow lots in older parts of town and other possible options for the garage. Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to deny the garage variance due to lack of hardship but to approve the driveway variance. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEANETTE HARRIS TO MOVE A 1972 MOBILE HOME TO MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:24 p.m. with the reading of publication #4438 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 3, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request to move a 1972 Ritz Craft trailer home to McDonalds Trailer Court. City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the staff recommendations to update to Life Safety Issues. • Ms Harris explained the house has been brought up to code since a fire. She commented on the issues being addressed except for smoke detectors. There was discussion on the Safety Issues and the need for the interconnected smoke detectors. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the hearing closed at 8:28 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to approve the request subject to Life Safety Issues being met. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF "SIOUX HILLS NO. 2 SUBMITTED BY SKIP QUADE, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the history of the previous preliminary plat submitted by Mr. Quade and the platting. City Engineer Rodeberg commented on concerns with servicing the area in the event it is annexed into the city. He also commented on his concerns with wet lands • and lot sizes. He stated Mr. Quade's proposal meets county and state guidelines. Mr. Rodeberg explained the city staff recommendation of certified inspectors and installers for the septic systems as required by the HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/15/92 • Shoreland Ordinance. Mr. Craig moved to recommend no objection to the final plat noting city staff recommendations of certified installer and inspector for the septic system. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY MICHAEL ROSE, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS Mr. Plotz commented on the sketch plan and city staff recommendations regarding septic systems. Mr. Rose commented on contacting Pellinen Surveying for the topography and he is in the process of obtaining soil boring and perk tests on each lot. Mr. Ebent moved to recommend no objection to city council subject to city staff recommendations regarding certified installers and inspectors to review the septic systems and the owner of the property must verify finished floor elevations at 1,046.5 Seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "HUEBERT'S • SUBDIVISION" SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS Mr. Huebert explained the plat and location. Mr. Craig moved no objection noting staff recommendations regarding certified installers and inspectors to review the septic systems and owner to review the need for overhead power line easement. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "HUEBERT'S SECOND SUBDIVISION" SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS City Engineer Rodeberg explained the location of property. Mr. Huebert explained his intent to build the house so the lot could be split in the future. Mr. Craig moved no objection to the request subject to staff recommendation of certifying the septic system. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/15/92 • (e) CONSIDERATION TO BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC. Mr. Craig stepped down from the commission on this item. City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the request and the staff recommendation to annex all of Lot 6 which would include Wigen property. There was discussion on the sewer main owned by Hutchinson Technology the in the future may serve some of the city. Mr. Lenz made a motion to begin annexation proceedings for the entire lot 6, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (f) DISCUSSION OF REQUEST BY THE DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ON ORDINANCE CHANGE REGARDING BANNER SIGNS Mr. Plotz commented on a memo from the Downtown Design Review Committee requesting an ordinance change regarding . banner signs. There was discussion on the enforcement of the ordinance. The Planning Commission directed staff to draft and ordinance regarding banner signs. (g) DISCUSSION OF MEETING TIME Mr. Craig made a motion for the planning commission to meet at 5:30 p.m. on the 3rd Tuesday of the month beginning in October, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (h) COMMENTS ON PROPOSED COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN There was discussion of the changes in the county comprehensive plan. (i) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY KURT REINER FOR FEED LOT IN HUTCHINSON TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS There was discussion of the size of the property to justify a feed lot. • Mr. Craig made a motion for an unfavorable recommendation 5 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/15/92 of the request, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (j) DISCUSSION OF REZONING REQUESTED BY LOUIS KING Mr. Louis King, 116 Monroe, stated his property was rezoned to I/C 12 years ago. City Administrator Plotz commented on the proposal. Mr. King presented a sketch of the proposal to the rear of the house to eliminate a flat roof. The Planning Commission directed Mr. King to apply for a rezoning to R -2. (h) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF None. 5. OLD BUSINESS NONE 6. • There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. • 1J 0 u CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA COMPILED BY J. ROUEBERG COMPUTED BY. J. ROUEBERG CHECKED BY CAL RICE 0 ASSFSSMF I1 1,041 Nu ;(9 LEI I ING NO 9, PROJECT NO 92 14 SIKTHGRFEN FSTATE_ S (GOLF VIEW COURI) STORM SEWER, SANITARY SOWER, WAIERMAIN, SEWER & WATER SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB & GUTTER. BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING & APPURTENANCES PAGE 1 OF 1 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES & STREET PER LOT $9,031.38 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD. 10 ACCOUNT CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK UNDERGROUND UTILITIES TOTAL NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER ADD] HON OR SUBDIVISION NO NO AND STREET CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT 01 36 -117-30 -05-0670 KEVIN COMPTON & DONALD E ERICKSON 18482 202ND CIRCLE 23.411.0010 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 6TH GHEE. N Io.S IATES 1 1 $9,031.36 $9,031.38 02 36 -11730 -05-0880 KEVIN COMPTON &DONALD E. ERICKSON 18482 202ND CIRCLE 23411,0020 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 BTH GREEN ESTATES 2 1 $903138 $9,031.38 03 36- 11730 -05-0690 KEVIN COMPTON & DONALD E. ERICKSON 18482 202ND CIRCLE 23011.0030 HUTCHINSON. MN 55350 8TH GREEN ESTATES 3 1 $9031 38 $9,031 38 04 38- 117 - 300"700 KEVIN COMPTON& DONALD F ERICKSON 18482 202ND CIRCLE 23.411,0040 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 8TH GREEN ESTA FES 4 1 $9,03138 $9,03136 05 36- 117 - 30-05 -0710 KEVIN COMP TON & DONALD E. ERICKSON 18482 202ND CIRCLE 234110050 HUTCHINSON, MN 55300 BTH GREEN ESTATES 5 1 $9,031.38 $9,03138 TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROLL NO 279 $45,158.80 (NOTE'. IF PARCELS ARE SPUT, ASSESSMENT 10 EACH HALF WOULD BE $4,515 68) I V RESOLUTION :0• RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING .E... O. PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 279 LETTING NO. 9 PROJECT WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Sixth Green Estates (Golf View Court) north of 8th Avenue N.W. in Tract A, Registered Land Survey #20 by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 37.013.75 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 8,143.05 , so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 45,156.80 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ?QNNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $ 45,156.80 . 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5_25 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment • resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9 -Z(• RESOLUTION 0 RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 279 LETTING NO. 9 PROJECT NO. 92-14 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 22nd day of September, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Sixth Green Estates (Golf View Court) north of 8th Avenue N.W. in Tract A, Registered Land Survey X20 by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCFG1i,SON, MINNESOTA: 1. The hearing on such proposed assessment is hereby waived in accordance with the attached "Petition for Local Improvement" and "Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal ". 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 30th, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 0 9-u• RESOLUTION NO. 9811 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 279 LETTING NO. 9, PROJECT NO. 92 -14 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Sixth Green Estates (Golf View Court) north of 8th Avenue N.W. in Tract A, Registered Land Survey #20 by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1st, 1992, until the 31st day of December, 1993. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 30th day of October, 1992; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor lJ City Administrator 9 - ?Y , 1 C\ • CITY OF I IUT0ON. MINNL SO LA ASSFSSMI N101 NO lnu nnc of 1 COMPIII.0 DY. J. RODI DING I I DING No 12, 1 Pull 1: 1 Nn 92 I6 UNI11 ituHUUNI11 t 111 I1ES COMPUTFD HY'. J. ROUF_HLHG INDUS IRIAI 130011 VARD & S 1141 1 PI H 101 $10'J.92057 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE STORM SEWER, SAW l AHY SEWER, WA fERMAIN, SEWC H 6 WA7LR SERVICES, GRADING. CRAVLL BASL, CUHD & GUI ILR, UI IUMINOUS BASF. HITUMINOU,, SURFACING &APPURTENANCES NUMDtH OF YLARS SPREAD 10 ACCOUNT CITYPIDNUMHFR IOT HIOCK UNDERGROUNDUHIIIIIS TOTAL NUMBER COUNTY PIDNUMHER NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPER IV OWNLR ADDHIONORSUHDIVISION NO NO ANDSIR61_ I C ONSIHUCIION ASSESSMENT 01 05- 116 -29 -03-0010 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION 225 MICHIGAN STRFFT N69' OF 1 OT 2 & LOTS 3 THRU 6 23.2590130 HIJ LCHINSON, MN 55350 IIUICHINSON INDUS IHIAI. LASI HICI 3 $68,36234 $66.362.50 02 05 -116- 29-04-0060 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION 225 MICHIGAN STREET 23256 -0050 HUICHINSON, MN 55350 I IUTCHINSONINDUSIRIAI IMAHICT 1 2 $2.31915 $23,19557 03 05116 -29 04 -0100 HU ICHINSON U I ILI I IES COMMISSION 225 MICHIGAN STREET 232590120 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 IIUICIIINSONINDUSIRIAI D181RICI 1 -v 2 $86,36214 $66,36250 10IAL ASSESSMENT ROIL NO 280 $199,920.57 1 C\ RESOLUTION NO. 9812 Ah RESOLUTION DECLARING C•S • BE ASSESSED AM MW ORDERING PREPARATION • . PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 280 LETTING • PROJECT NO. WHEREAS cost has been determined for the improvement of Hutchinson Utilities Access Drive, "Industrial Boulevard ", from Michigan Street to City Limits, by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 163.869.32 , and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $ 36,051.25 , so that the total cost of the improvement will be $ 199,920.57 . MR, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $ 199,920.57 . 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of • 5.25 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9 -V, RESOLUTION RESOLUTION P / HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 280 PROJECT LE7TING NO. 12 / WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 22nd day of September, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Hutchinson Utilities Access Drive, "Industrial Boulevard ", from Michigan Street to City Limits by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, 1HERKPORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The hearing on such proposed assessment is hereby waived in accordance with the attached "Petition for Local Improvement" and "Agreement of Assessment and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal ". 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 30th, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9- RESOLUTION NO. 9814 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 280 LETTING NO. 12, PROJECT NO. 92 -18 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Hutchinson Utilities Access Drive, "Industrial Boulevard ", from Michigan Street to City Limits by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire • assessment from November 1st, 1992, until the 31st day of December, 1993. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 30th day of October, 1992; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of September, 1992. Mayor • City Administrator 9- (6 12)587.5 587 -5151 - r;cv C/TY OF HUTCHINSON �� 37 WASHING70N AVENUE WEST lIU1CHIh'SON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 16, 1992 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: DOUG MEIER • SUT3J ECT: REQUEST INSTALLATION OF NO PARKING SIGNS Una =r our present policy, we display temporary signs on streets within the 0 area where snow is windrowed and removed, with exception of those streets already permanently signed. present policy requires updating at this tir:a so that the City may implement. it mire efficient snow removal operation. I'm recommending that the streets indicated below be permanently signed to read "No Parking This Block, 2AM -6AM, 1 n,inv '"rIF:U 1 MAY." Washington Avenue from Franklin St. to Adams St. 1Gt Avenue NE from Main Street to Bluff Street 1st Avenue NW from Main Street to Franklin Street 1st Avenue SE from Main Street to Monroe Street 1st Avenue SW from Franklin Street to Main Street end Avenue SW from Franklin Street to Main Street 2nd Avenue SE from Main Street to Hassan Street 3rd Avenue SE from Main Street to Adams Street Franklin Street from 4th Avenue SW to 2nd Avenue NW Passan Street from 3rd Avenue SE to lst Avenue NE Grove Street from 2nd Avenue SW to Washington Avenue Monroe Street from 1st Avenue SE to 2nd Avenue SE tm ndditi funding is required to implement this program. i DAVID B. ARNOLD CIA Y D. MCDOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON • O. RAH BY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. RODE LAURA E. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN PADL D. DOVE" JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O. McGEB CATHRYN D. REHER September 4, 1992 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSOV, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 FAX (612) 561 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Gary: Enclosed are copies of UCC forms which the Council should approve next Tuesday evening. These forms release security no longer necessary for the replacement of the Hutchinson Technology bonds. • Thank you. Verry� truly yours, f I fl Barry A erson GBA:ck Enclosures 0 01 COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C. LAt LIER PAUL M. BEOICR CHARLES R.CARXICRAEL" MM CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545 -9000 MN TOLL FREE B00- 343-4545 PAX(612)545-1793 501 SOUTH POIIRTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 369 -2214 PAX (612) 389 -5506 ` , 1 Z s4�g 3 ♦ 9 � O �EPI�92 :v REC EIv W g By U1 iZ * CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION L C V , "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION / n SEP 03 '92 15 19 FREGRE & BED • September 2, 1992 BY TELECOPY Ruth N. Bauer Hutchinson Technology Incorporated 40 West Highland Park Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: peelease of Collateral Dear Ruth: 1./ r.e Attached are copies of two UCC termination statements and two UCC statement amendments that must be filed with the Secretary of State of Minnesota and the McLeod County, Minnesota Recorder in order to release the collateral consisting of equipment, machinery and fixtures from the lien of the indenture relating to the 1973 industrial development • revenue bonds. The two terminations relate to UCC statements on which HTI is listed as the debtor. The two amendments relate to UCC statements on which the City of Hutchinson is listed as the debtor; the original statements filed by the City also reflect the City's security interest in lease payments and that interest should remain of record. Diane Chalupsky asked that we contact Jerry Gilligan, counsel for the City of Hutchinson, directly. I have put in a call to Jerry to ask that he review and confirm that the attached statements are in the appropriate form. I understand that Mr. Gilligan has been working with the City of Hutchinson in connection with the recent assignment of the City's interest to the Trustee and that he is aware of the release of collateral that is to take place. Upon confirmation by all parties that the statements are in satisfactory form, I will deliver the original UCC statements to Diane at First Trust for execution by First Trust. She will return them to me and, with her written authorization, we will take care of filing the statements with the Minnesota Secretary of State and the McLeod County Recorder. The original stamped statements returned to us will • �-X, SEP e3 '92 15 :19 FAEGRE & BENSON P.3 Ruth N. Bauer September 2, 1992 Page 2 • go to Diane and I will retain stamped acknowledgement copies to be forwarded to you after filing with the appropriate officials is completed. I will be out of the office between September 8 and September 17. I am hopeful that we will be able to file the statements this week, after Mr. Gilligan and Diane review their form. very truly yours, Peggy Stsi£ Abram PS"do:4177U Enclosures cc: Diane Chalupsky Jerome P. Gilligan • 0 Rwaleari. Ise. Sa W.I ST. This STATEMENT Is presented for filing pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code 1. Debtoms) (Last Name Irs1) and Adaress(esl - acurad artypes) and Address(es) For Hutchinson Technology First Trust National ASSOCiatior Filing Incorporated (formerly First Trust Center Officer 4W utehinson Industrial Corp.) 180 East Fifth Street O West Highland Park St. Paul, HN 55101 Hutchinson, MN 55350 3. This statement raters to original Financing Statement bearing File No. 88598 Filed with McLeod County Date Filed .Tnn„Ary IA tea. 4. ❑Continuation The original financing Statement between the foregoing Debtor and Secured party, bear - Ing file number above, is still effective. S.CAsstgnment The Secured Party's right under the Financing Statement bearing file number shown aDove to the property described in fleet 9 has been assigned to the assignee whose name and address appears In item 9. & Q Amendment. Financing Statement bearing file number shown above i3 amended as set forth in Item 9. 7.[JRelease. Secured Parry maintains a security interest in financing statement bearing file number shown above but releases the collateral shown in Item S. &ZTermination Secured Party no longer claims a security interest under the Financing Statement bear - Ing file number shown above. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION State of Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code Standard Form UCG3 Statements of Continu Assignment, Release. Etc. (Read Instructions on Ba ck) By. Signatures) o Oebtor(s) (necessary only. i Item 8 Is applicable.) By. ignature(s) of urea arty(iss) Approved by Secretary of State of Minnesota State of Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code Standard Form UCCJ Statements of Continuation. Assignmen Release. Etc. (Read Instructions on Back) (1) Flting Offices COPY - AlphabetiW (Rev- ZM5) .m.e.. r.or Rr tea a...,....... aLL 10M ]U wu, 01 In, V r. ueotons) (Last Name First) and Address(es) 2 Secured PanYpes) and Addresses) For Hutchinson Technology First Trust National Associatio Filing Incorporated (formerly First Trust Canter Officer Hutchinson Industrial Corp.) 180 East Fifth Street 40 West Highland Park St. Paul, MN 55101 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Filed with Secretary of State Date Filed January 26 4.0 Continuation. The original financing Statement between the foregoing Debtor and Secured party, bear - 5. CAssignment. Ing file number above, is Still effective. The Secured Party's right under the Financing Statement bearing fife number shown above to the property described in Item 9 has been assigned to the assignee who" name 8.13Amendment and address appears In Item 9. Financing Statement bearing file number shown above is amended as Set forth In Item 9. L Ralea.a. Secured Party maintains a security interest in financing statement bearing file number shown above but releases the collateral shown in Item 9. 8- Wermination Secured Party no longer Claims a security interest under the Financing Statement bear- ing file number shown above. 9. FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION By; By; . 19nature(s) of Debtors) (necessary only I Item 8 s applicable.) gnature($) of cured any es) aaff lR/eGY - fete IA e. J v _ Raw *v, uw,u_ State or Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code Standard Form UCG3 �wa Statements of Continuation, Assignment. Release, Etc. (Read Instructions on Back) to the 1. Debtors) (Last Name First) and Addresses) 2. Secured Pany(iss) and Address(es) For First Trust Cat>pany, Inc Fling • City of Hutchinson (formerly F' st Trust y Officer 37 Washington Avenue West of Saint Pain), as Trust Hutchinson, M1 55350 180 Fast 5th Street St. Paul, IAN 55101 Attn: Co rate Trust Dept. . This statement refers to original Financing statement bealing File No. 88599 Filed with McLeod Cotmty Data Filad January 28 1988 5.O Assignment. mendment. .�� ❑ a s a. 6.O Termination 0 Chattel paper consistV and to a Lease dated \ Debtor, as Lessor, Corporation, now. known Incorporated, as Tenant, including, but not limite therefrom. The original financing Statement between the foregoing Debtor and Secured party, bear - Ing file number above. is still effective. The Secured Party's right under the Financing Statement bearing file number shown above to the Of00eny described in Item 9 has been assigned to the assignee who" name and address appears in Item 9. Financing Statement bearing file number shown above is amended as set forth in Item 9- Secured Party maintains a security interest in financing statement bearing file number shown above but releases the collateral shown in Item 9. Secured Party no longer claims a security Interest under the Financing Statement bear - Ing file num ber shown above. subject to this financing stag hereby released. fixtures 1il evi ously FIRST TRLST COWXW INC.. as Trustee By: B Signature(s) of ebtor(s) (necessary only if Item 6 is applicable.) Signatures) of Secured Party(ies) Approved by Secretary of State of Minnesorc 0 1 Filing Off WO CO PY - Alphabetical (Rev. 2185) SEP 03 1 92 15 FREGRE & BENSON _.. 4 P.7 thid Lessor's interest in o May 1, 1973, between 3 Hutchinson Industrial s Hutchinson Technology I all proceeds thereof, to, all rentals and income 40 � n� FG Wall, NY•�ta. YY. SafOi M111 W.IAa St.Neof Minnesota Uniform Commercial Code Standire> UCC-3 Statements of Contin uation. Assignment, Aelease, Etc. IAead Instructions on Back) for City of Hutchinson First Trust Ctat>panY. Inc. 37 Washington Avenue West (fornierly First Trust 8Fast Paul), a m tee Compan • Hutchinson, M 55350 10 St. Paul, M 55101 Attn: Corporate Trust Dept. Fil w ith RP e- a+ ZIC Of Stn a Dat Filed 5.0 Assignment. b+CN1 -- >P i * elea se. & ❑ Tormination For Filing Officer The original financing Statement between the foregoing Debtor and Secured party, bear• ing file number above, is still effective. The Secured Party's right under the Financing Statement bearing file number shown above to the property described in Item 9 her been assigned to the assignee whose name and address appears in Item 9- Financing Statement bearing file number shown above is amended as set forth in Item 9. Secured Party maintains a security interest in financing statement bearing file number shown above but releases the collateral Shown in item 9. Secured Party no longer claims a security interest under the Financing Statement tear• ing file number shown above. • FFRS'f TRT/ST tY'YNP N, T� f -a Tn�c+m By: Sjgnaturws) of Deblor(s) (necessary only if Item 6 is applicable.) By. S ignature(s) of Secured Party(ies) Approved by Secretary of Stale of Minnesota (1) Filing Officer Copy . Alphabetical (Rev, V85) SEP 03 '92 1522 FAEGRE & BENSON Chattel paper and to a Le Debtor, as Corporation, Incorporated including, therefrom. is �.J on% in g of he Lessor's interest in e at d as f May 1, 1973, between Lessor, and Hutchinson Industrial now kno n a Hutchinson Technology as Tenan a all proceeds thereof, not limite t , all rentals and income t P.9 52955 AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of September, 1992 by and between the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and Aagard West, Inc., a Minnesota corporation. RECITALS: 1. The City of Hutchinson (City) desires to enter into an agreement with a garbage hauler for the purpose of providing residential garbage services to the residents of the City of Hutchinson. 2. Aagard West, Inc. ( Aagard) desires to provide such services; 3. The City has used a competitive bidding process designed to provide high quality services to the residents of the City of . Hutchinson at the lowest possible price and Aagard has submitted a proposal which meets the specifications of the City at the lowest price; 4. The parties desire to enter into a written agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and also for One Dollar and other good and valuable consideration, the parties do agree as follows: 1. SPECIFICATIONS. A true and correct copy of the specifications for residential refuse hauling for the City of Hutchinson are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit " A " and incorporated herein as if fully set out. Aagard shall comply with is -1- 9 -y, all of the terms and conditions of the specifications set forth on • Exhibit "A ". 2. INSURANCE. All insurance and performance bonds required by this contract, or by City ordinance, may be provided by Aagard on an annual basis. Aagard shall provide, at least 45 days in advance of expiration date of any policy of insurance or performance bond, a new declaration sheet or other proof, satisfactory to the City, that appropriate insurance coverage or appropriate bond or performance bonds have been secured. 3. ASSIGNMENT. Aagard shall not enter into any subcontract for performance of any services contemplated under this agreement nor assign any interest in the agreement without the prior written approval of the City of Hutchinson and subject to such conditions and provisions as the City, in its sole discretion, may deem • necessary. 4. DEFAULT. The failure of Aagard to perform any of the provisions of this agreement, or the failure of Aagard to provide satisfactory performance to the residents of the City of Hutchinson, shall constitute a default in the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The City may, at any time, terminate the contract for a breach of the terms of the agreement by Aagard or for unsatisfactory performance by Aagard. The City shall not be limited to an action for damages for breach. Failure to exercise the right to terminate the contract shall not be deemed a waiver of the right to terminate for future violations or for future -2- • unsatisfactory performance. Default shall also include the • voluntary or involuntary filing of a Bankruptcy Petition. 5. 24 HOUR NOTICE. If Aagard shall fail to make a garbage pickup at any residence, it shall do so within 24 hours after notification from the City of the address where the pickup was not made. Aagard shall also respond promptly upon request by the City to clean up any spills or loose solid waste that results from its operation. 6. REASONABLE REGULATIONS. The City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to make additional reasonable regulations regarding the performance of Aagard, provided, however, that the City shall first consult with Aagard. 7. EXPIRATION. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from and after November 1, 1992 until October 31, 1995. • 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Aagard agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees from any and all claims, causes of action, liabilities, losses, damages, costs, expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, suits, demands and judgments of any nature, because of bodily injury to, or death of any person or persons, because of Aagard or others and arising under this contract, including loss of use from any cause whatsoever, which may be asserted against the City on any such matters and to pay and satisfy any judgment incurred in connection with any such claim. The City shall in no way be liable for any claims or charges incurred by Aagard in the performance of this 0 -3- contract. . 9. DAMAGES. Both parties shall use their best efforts to mitigate any damages which might be suffered by reason of any event giving rise to a remedy hereunder. In the event of a default by Aagard, the City may recover the reasonable and necessary costs of termination, including, but not limited to administrative costs, attorney's fees and legal costs, from the defaulting party. If Aagard fails to meet the specifications, terms and conditions of the contract documents, for any reason, excepting delays caused by uncontrollable circumstances, the City shall have the right to provide the services from other sources on the open market and may deduct as damages from any money due or coming due to Aagard, the difference between the agreed upon price and the cost of the temporary services. . Dated: AAGARD WEST, INC. By: Dated: CITY OF HUTCHINSON By: Paul L. Ackland, Mayor Attest: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • -4- STATE OF MINNESOTA) • ) SS. COUNTY OF McLEOD ) On this day of September, 1992, before me a Notary Public, personally appeared the of Aagard West, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and who executed the above document on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF McLEOD ) On this day of September, 1992, before me a Notary Public, personally appeared Paul L. Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator for the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal corporation, who executed the same on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public • 0 -5- C M E M 0 DATE: September 18, 1992 TO: Mayor 6 City Council FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official iy% RE: Request for Direction on McLeod County Fairgrounds Building - Building Code Issue The intent of this memo is to inform the Mayor, City Council, Fire Chief and Fire Marshall of Building Code concerns relative to the proposed fairgrounds building construction. It is my belief that the bid documents request an exception to the code of which I do not feel authorized to concede. . To date, I have not received a conclusive building code plan review summary from Korngiebel Architects. It is my preliminary code analysis that the 4 -H, fine arts, and horticulture buildings should be classified as an assembly type occupancy, due to the occupant load. This A.2.1. (assembly) occupancy does not permit V -N construction of which is being proposed, and has been bid. The debated issue, and possibly the practical analysis is that these (3) buildings will only be used one -week per year. Also, the agribition and multipurpose building are designated for large gatherings throughout the year. It should also be noted that the (3) buildings in question do not have frost footings, but will be insulated and can be heated. There is also a kitchen arrangement in the 4 -H building. Another issue is the proximity of buildings to each other, I will not request direction on this matter presently as architect, Jim Haugen, has assured me that rating of exterior walls, exit and emergency lights, exit doorways, panic hardware, etc. will be complied with. . City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Departnient 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 . Printed on recvcled paper - 9 -� Page 2 • Mayor & City Council Request For Direction - McLeod County Fairgrounds As practical as it may appear, I am obligated to all involved to inform and document the building code regulations. Provided the Council, Fire Chief, and Fire Marshall feel the strict regulation of the code is impractical, I will issue the building permit based on Section 106 - Modifications. Modifications Sec. 106 When there are practical difficulties involved in carrying out the provisions of this code, the building official may grant modifications for individual cases. The building official shall first find that a special individual reason makes the strict letter of this code impractical and that the modification is in conformance with the intent and purpose of this code and that such modification does not lessen any fire - protection requirements or any degree of structural integrity. The details of any action granting modifications shall be recorded and entered in the files of the code enforcement agency. JGM /mms cc: Marilyn J. Swanson - 9 -22 -92 Agenda Gary Plotz, City Administrator G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney Brad Emans, Fire Chief George Field, Fire Marshall Mark Hensen, Building Inspector • September 1, 1992 A RNOLD & M CDOWF.LI, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5681 CEDAR LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-149_ (612)545 -9000 MN TOIL FREE 800- 343 -4545 PAX (618) 545-1793 Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Proulx v. Koelln v. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 3244 -92056 Dear Gary: 01 I u11M1C1. WI I.I.IAM M I AMMRON RAYMOND C LALLIEN PAUL M.MCU1CH CHARLES R.CARMICIIAML 501 SOUTH Poll Rrll STREET PRINCETON,MIN)IMSOT.A 55371 (fi12)9n9 PAX (613) 3R9 - 5506 101 PANE PLACE. D UTCHINSON, MIMMESDTA 55350 (612) 587 -7575 PAX (612) SN > 40'lli I am writing to you with regard to the above referenced litigation, which centers around a drainage problem between two adjoining lots on California Street. I am somewhat handicapped in that I do not have a drawing of the property, but it is my understanding that the various parties to this dispute have reached an agreement. One part of the agreement will require the city to consent to the connection of a sump pump discharge pipe to the storm sewer located adjacent to the Koelln residence. The city would not be expected to make a financial contribution in connection with this effort, but, of course, consent of the City Council is required anytime there is invasion of the storm sewer on a line. The parties have entered into, or will enter into, an agreement to address damage issues and easements for repair and maintenance, and on that basis, I would have no objection to the city granting permission to connect to the storm sewer. Any such consent would be conditioned upon the absolute right of the city to require the removal of the sump pump discharge pipe when, in the sole judgment of the city, such removal is required. Further, the city is not making any kind of a commitment that the particular storm sewer involved in this matter will not be abandoned, altered or for some other reason, made unusable in the future. In other words, the parties involved in this transaction • connect to the city storm sewer at their own risk and the city - t'. NII "1'119EU AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPMCIALIS "P HY 'rli P. MINNEsSirx STATE HAR ASSWHATION 't"EX "1 "IPIEO AN A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST DY TIIE MINNP.SII'I'A STATE. DAR ASSOCIATION DAVID IS ARNOLD OANY O. Mc IX)WMI.1. ST . D • O. HARRY X P.NSON� HARRY ANDERSON RSON STEVEN S. II(MIM LAURA E. PNETLAND DAVID A. 11NIIP.009MANN PAUL R IX)VE" JOSEPH M. PAIP.NENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O. WORE CATHRYN 1). NEVER September 1, 1992 A RNOLD & M CDOWF.LI, ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5681 CEDAR LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-149_ (612)545 -9000 MN TOIL FREE 800- 343 -4545 PAX (618) 545-1793 Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Proulx v. Koelln v. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 3244 -92056 Dear Gary: 01 I u11M1C1. WI I.I.IAM M I AMMRON RAYMOND C LALLIEN PAUL M.MCU1CH CHARLES R.CARMICIIAML 501 SOUTH Poll Rrll STREET PRINCETON,MIN)IMSOT.A 55371 (fi12)9n9 PAX (613) 3R9 - 5506 101 PANE PLACE. D UTCHINSON, MIMMESDTA 55350 (612) 587 -7575 PAX (612) SN > 40'lli I am writing to you with regard to the above referenced litigation, which centers around a drainage problem between two adjoining lots on California Street. I am somewhat handicapped in that I do not have a drawing of the property, but it is my understanding that the various parties to this dispute have reached an agreement. One part of the agreement will require the city to consent to the connection of a sump pump discharge pipe to the storm sewer located adjacent to the Koelln residence. The city would not be expected to make a financial contribution in connection with this effort, but, of course, consent of the City Council is required anytime there is invasion of the storm sewer on a line. The parties have entered into, or will enter into, an agreement to address damage issues and easements for repair and maintenance, and on that basis, I would have no objection to the city granting permission to connect to the storm sewer. Any such consent would be conditioned upon the absolute right of the city to require the removal of the sump pump discharge pipe when, in the sole judgment of the city, such removal is required. Further, the city is not making any kind of a commitment that the particular storm sewer involved in this matter will not be abandoned, altered or for some other reason, made unusable in the future. In other words, the parties involved in this transaction • connect to the city storm sewer at their own risk and the city - t'. NII "1'119EU AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPMCIALIS "P HY 'rli P. MINNEsSirx STATE HAR ASSWHATION 't"EX "1 "IPIEO AN A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST DY TIIE MINNP.SII'I'A STATE. DAR ASSOCIATION Gary D. Plotz September 1, 1992 • Page 2 makes no representations regarding any future problems, conditions or circumstances that may develop as a result of this hookup. I believe John Rodeberg can give you additional information. Thank you. Best regards. Very tr,&I ~urs, G. Sar-ly Anderson GBA /pb 054- Lrr.01 • • OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE. SEP 22. 1992. 1:05 PM ----------------------------------------- 1990 TICS • ARNOLD & MCDOWELL LEGAL SERVICES HUTCHINSON UTILITIES ELEC. 1991 IMPROV.BDS ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPE /DES SOD CUTTER 1992 IMPRO.BDS MID -MN HOT MIX INC 1992 REF IMPR BD DORSEY & WHITNEY 1992 TICB ARNOLD & MCDOWELL DORSEY & WHITNEY MCGRAW & WARD IMPROV OTHER THAN BLOGS LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES CAP.IMPRO.FUND OVERHEAD DOOR OF ST.CL000 3 OVERHEAD DOORS • CENTRAL GARAGE ALLIED MECH.SYSTEMS BELL REDUCER BRANDON TIRE CO TIRES COAST TO COAST SCREWS,CONOUIT,STRAINER FARM & HOME DIST. CO IRON POWD HARREL BROS.INC KNOB INK SPOTS PRINTING FORMS JERRYS TRANSMISSION CARTRIDGES - GASKETS -KITS NORDIC TRUCK PARTS INC GRAB HANDLE PLAZA HARDWARE BITS, SCREW EXTRACTORS PLOWMANS OIL SENDER SCHMELING OIL CO 30 GALLONS BULK OIL SCHRAMM IMPLEMENT SPINDLE SPEC MATERIALS INC OIL FILTER ST.JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC FILTER TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE ALIGNMENT TWO WAY COMM INC RESOLDERED WIRES WIGEN CHEVROLET CO REPAIR DOOR WINDOW GENERAL FUND AM RISK SERVICES SEPT SERVICES ANDERSON'S DECORATING CEN 5 GALLONS PAINT & BRUSHES ANDERSON, NANCY ELECTION JUDGE • ARNOLD & MCCOWELL SEPT PROF SERVICES AUTOMATION SUPPLY CO LABELS BENNETT OFFICE SUP. MTCE CONTRACT BRAUN INTERTEC ENVIRONMEN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS &MPCA $642.50 $93.67 $736.17• Page 1 $329.09 $329.09• $22,190.50 $22,190.50■ $3,638.40 $3,638.40* $4,552.67 $7,180.16 $87,54 $11,820.37• $3,748.00 $3,748.00• $6.39 $78.76 $18.81 $20.61 $4.47 $54.14 $404.88 $6.76 $27.44 $13.10 $119.81 $159.45 $27.33 $43.46 $32.95 $30:00 $7.25 $1.055.61+ $1 ,600.00 $159.10 $63.75 $5,558.50 $42.67 $95.05 $4,690.00 11—Al • • OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT ------------------------- BP.EHMER, DEAN BRINKMAN STUDIO BRUMMOND, MARY J. BYE, CHARLOTTE C.RIVER VET CLINIC CAMERA SHOP CASH DRAWER #4 CASH WISE CENTRAL ALLIED ENTERPRISE CENTURY LABS CITY OF HUTCHINSON SELF I COAST TO COAST COLLEN KISLING &EVEN -TEMP COMM TRANSPORTATION COUNTY TREASURER CULLIGAN WATER COND DAGGETT, DORIS DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY DEPT.OF LABOR & INO.,CAIS DOMINO'S PIZZA DONALD TOONEM &BERNHAGEN E DONALD TODNEM &TEK MECHANI EMBLEM ENTERPRISES ERICKSON, LEONARD ERICKSONS MORE 4 FAMILY REX,ALL DRUG FARM & HOME DIST. CO FENSKE'S STUMP REMOVAL FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO. FITZLOFF HARDWARE FLOOR CARE SUPPLY FRANK, FERN GLENCOE UNIFORMS GREAT PLAINS SUPPLY HAGEN, RUTH HENSEN , MARK HUTCH CONVENTION & HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY HUTCH IRON& METAL HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO HUTCHINSON LEADER HUTCHINSON UTILITIES ISIA JAYCO AVIATION DOES SPORT SHOP JOHNSON, ROSINA K MART KENNEY, BARB KING, MICHAEL KIRCHOFF, BRIAN KNIGGE, DARLEEN KOKESH ATHLETIC KOSEK, TAMMY KOTTKE, GRACE TUE, SEP 22, 1992, 1:05 PM ---------------------------- VOLLEYBALL REFUND FILM ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION JUDGE BOAROING,EUTH FEES PRINT TAPES GROCERIES GRAY QTS, GRAY STD, BACKE CLEANERS STOP -LOST PAYMENT GLASS CLEANER HOUSING REHAB PAYMENT #1 TRAFFIC CONTROL AGREEMENT OIL FEES SALT ELECTION JUDGE ONR REGISTRATION FEES EXEMPTION C.PAULSON- EN6.LICENSE 4 DOMINO'S PIZZAS HOUSING REHAB PAYMENT #4 HOUSING REHAB PAYT #S 203 PATCHES SR. TOUR REFUND FRUIT, BAKERY BADGES, PAPERS PLASTIC FUNNEL STUMP REMOVAL SCISSORS &WRIST SUPPORT WASTE BASKET- KEY -GLUE FOAMING CLEANER ELECTION JUDGE TROUSERS,SHIRTS,HOLDERS LUMBER, NAILS ELECTION JUDGE SW CHAPTER MTG- REDWOOD FA AUGUST LODGING TAX RECHARGE EXTINGUISHERS ANGLE &FLAT IRON PHYSICAL- MUELLER FAUCET FALL /WINTER BROCHURE 24 FLUOR LAMPS BADGES 7000 GAL FUEL PLAQUE ELECTION JUDGE COMFORT MATS VOLLEYBALL REFUND 7 HRS SCOREBOARD 18 HRS WORK ELECTION JUDGE HELMETS,PANTS,VEST REFUND TACKLE FOOTBALL ELECTION JUDGE $25.00 $7.65 $63.75 $70.13 $176.10 $19.97 $91.21 $11.56 $94.96 $523.14 $17,533.50 $269.70 $8,375.00 $806.86 $196.70 $11.80 $63.75 $172.00 $30.00 $10.00 $28.00 $1,701.00 $567.25 $392.77 $18.00 $15.90 $137.38 $336.93 $1,015.16 $36.08 $45.25 $5.52 $61.63 $559.57 $2,999.97 $70.13 $15.48 $2,064.00 $37.63 $12.61 $166.00 $73.40 $1,198.26 $21,553.39 $234.00 $8,860.95 $12.00 $70.13 $108.26 $50.00 $25.75 $76.50 $63.75 $1,775.94 $21.00 $63.75 page 2 • OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, SEP 22, 1992, 1:05 PM page 3 KRUEGER, MARLENE ELECTION JUDGE `663.75 L & P SUPPLY CO TRIMMER LINE $77.47 LAKE JENNIE REPAIR PARTS FOR RESPONSE VEHICL $282.01 • LARSON, QUENTIN SAFETY BOOTS $30.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES ANNUAL DUES $45,605.53 LETN SEPT SERVICE $288.00 LICKFETT, HELEN ELECTION JUDGE $70.13 LINDER BUS COMPANY BUS TO MEGA MALL $139.75 LOGIS LOGIS CHARGES FOR AUGUST $7,264.23 LORENCE & ASSC AIRPORT APPRAISALS $600.00 MARKA, JAMES SW CHAPTER MTG REDWOOD FA $15.28 MARQUARDT,MICHAEL W. MENS FB OFFICIAL $15.00 MARX, GAR SR. TOUR REFUND $18.00 MCGARVEY COFFEE INC 3 CASES COFFEE $137.25 MERRILL, KENNETH B. MGFOA CONFERENCE 576.52 METKOWSKI, MILDRED SR. TOUR REFUND $9.00 MID -MN HOT MIX INC 7 TON REG.BLACKTOP $156.55 MILLER, SEDONA ELECTION JUDGE $70.13 MN BOARD ON AGING 5 REG FOR ANNUAL CONF $170.00 MN GIS /LIS CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES - MERRILL $230.00 MN TWINS 33 TICKETS FOR 10 -1 GAME $380.00 MN. MICROGRAPHICS BLUELINE PAPER $102.83 MORAN, PETE UMPIRE 3 GAMES $18.00 MR. MOVIES SHINING THROUGH RENTAL $2.43 NICKLASSON ATHLETIC CO FOOTBALLS $459.26 NORTHLAND BEVERAGES CTY FAIR BEVERAGES $45.70 OLD LOG THEATRE 10 -8 PERF 46 TICKETS $828.00 OLSONS LOCKSMITH CHANGE IGN, GLOVE BOX KEY $102.13 • PAULSEN, CURT %SAFETY BOOTS $30.00 PERA- D.C.P. EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION $28.71 PETERSON BUS SERVICE BUS TWINS GAME 7 -18 $307.10 PLAZA HARDWARE LETTERS $195.82 PLOTZ -, GARY D. MEETINGS, MILEAGE $124.55 POLICE INSTITUTE REG- S.MADSON $45.00 PRINTS CHARMING T SHIRTS $50.93 PRO MAINTENANCE GENERAL CLEAN & BLINDS $219.50 PROCHNOW, EVELYN ELECTION JUDGE $70.13 QUADE ELECTRIC REPLACE BALLAST, BULB $242.40 REID, JIM SR. TOUR REFUND $18.00 ROLFE, OELAINE ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 SCHEPERS, NORMA ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 SCHMELING, LAURA J. REFUND VOLLEYBALL $18.00 SCHMELING,BRENT ADULT FS REFEREE $15.00 SCHMIDT, HARRIET ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 SCHNEIDER, FRED REFUND VOLLEYBALL $25.00 SCHNOBRICH, MARK CONFERENCE EXPENSE $104.00 SCHULTZ. JIM SR. TOUR REFUND $18.00 SCHWARZE, JEFF VOLLEYBALL REFUND $25.00 SEALE, PEARL ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY LAUNDRY $28.60 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 5122.41 SHOPKO MISC PRIZES $31.48 SIMONSON LUMBER CO POLE BARN NAILS $3.96 • SMITH,ANOREW UMPIRE SOFTBALL GAMSES $12.00 SMUTKA,KRIS REFUND VOLLEYBALL 525.00 SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY SUPPLIES $74.50 page 4 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, SEP 22, 1992, 1:05 PM --------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTHAM BUS COMM 92-17 & LIFE SAFETY PUBLI $705.96 SR.CENTER ADVISORY BD SUMMER CONCESSION WORKERS $1,496.00 STANDARD PRINTING FALL /WINTER BROCHURE $2,160.35 . STAR CABLEVISION SEPT SERVICE $4.07 STATE OF MINNESOTA CLOSE OF 1991 GRANT $580.00 TEWS, CLARA ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 THRAN, ESTHER SR. TOUR REFUND $9.00 TOTUSHEK, NORMA ELECTION JUDGE $61.63 TWO WAY C011M INC REPLACED SQUELCH MODULE $37.99 U S POSTMASTER OCTOBER NEWSLETTER $215.00 US WEST COMMUN SEPT SERVICES $104.95 US WEST DIRECT YELLOW & WHITE PAGES $26.52 VANHALE, EVELYN ELECTION JUDGE $64.81 VIKING COCA COLA POP SUPPLIES $776.50 VIKING INT PRODUCTS VIP 13 $103.10 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS COPY PAPER $101.00 WAL -MART SUPPLIES $132.65 WESELOH, PHYLLIS ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 WEST PUBLISHING CO MN ST 17 -17A 28KS $101.73 WIXCEY, HARRIET ELECTION JUDGE $63.75 WM MUELLER & SONS A.0 FINE $1,766.04 ZAHL EQUIPMENT CO SERVICE CALL FOR REPAIRS $206.37 $153,431.15+ PAYROLL FUND AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $590.00 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $123.10 G.T. GROWTH EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $175.00 • GLOBAL FUNDS INC EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $444.73 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $85.00 H.R.L.A.P.R. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $90.09 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $1,301.00 PERA LIFE INS CO. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $105.00 PERA- D.C.P. EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $28.71 PRUDENTIAL EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $130.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $11,403.71 TEMPLETON INC EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $95.00 WADELL & REED EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $150.00 WITHHOLDING TAX ACCT EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 $23,830.26 $38,551.60• PUBLIC SITES TRIPLE H & 0 CONTRACT PAYMENT $2,037.60 $2,037.60• REC /POOL DS DORSEY & WHITNEY % EXPENSES $138.40 $138.40* WATER /SEWER FUND AAGARD WEST SEPT CURBSIDE $5,986.00 ALLIED MECH.SYSTEMS GALV NIPPLE $2.31 • AM.PAYMENT CENTERS ANALYTICAL PRODUCTS GROUP 3 MONTHS DROP BOX SETPOINT STANDARDS RENT $64.00 $200.00 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL LEGAL SERVICES $2,093.66 AUTOMATION SUPPLY CO DISKS $40.23 page 4 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, SEP 22, 1992, 1:05 PM ----------------- - --- -- CASH DRAWER 44 COAST TO COAST . CROW CHEMICAL CO CURTIN SCIENTIFIC CO O.P.C.IND.INC FADDEN PUMP CO. FARM & HOME DIST. CO FEED RITE CONTROLS FITZLOFF HARDWARE GOPHER STATE INC HUTCHINSON LEADER HUTCHINSON UTILITIES ISCO INC JUUL CONTRACTING CO LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LOGIS • MN VALLEY TESTING LAB MORAINE PARK TECH COLLEGE MWOA OFFICE PRODUCTS PLAZA HARDWARE PONATH CONSTRUCTION INC QUADE ELECTRIC RCM ASSOCIATES SEC DONOHUE STANDARD PRINTING SVEN US WEST DIRECT VIKING PIPE SERVICES CO POSTCARDS SPRAYER,PIPE,BITS,GREASE CLEANERS,WAX APPLICATOR LAB SUPPLIES CHEMICALS GASKET,ORINGS,FILTERS BATTERY, TAPE HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID 2 TOILET SEATS CALLS RECYCLING WINNERS METER READING DEVICES THERMOSTAT CUT IN CURB STOP-CARLISLE 2ND QTR WORK /COMP LOGIS CHARGES FOR AUGUST SAMPLE TESTS BOOKS MWOA LAB SEMINAR REIMBURS HP VECTRA & PRINTER HANGERS, BIT, SCREWS OVER HEAD DOOR TROUBLESHOOTING REPAIR PROF SERVICES AUGUST PROF.FEES 3700 LETTER, POSTCARDS EXOTOX YELLOW PAGES VIEW SANITARY SEWERS YOUTH CENTER HUTCHINSON LEADER SHOPKO VIKING COCA COLA WAKEFIELD, SCOTT DUNK TANK ANSWERING MACHINE WITH AT SOFT DRINKS OCTOBER RENTAL RURAL FIRE ACCOUNT GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT BALANCE DUE ON PUMPER page 5 --------------- - - -- $4.75 $470.01 $70.59 $95.72 $90.00 $59.94 $45.37 $775.43 $70.61 $117.50 $124.80 $17,831.62 $86.38 $308.00 $3,792.72 $962.05 $432.00 $176.86 $645.39 $567.33 $11.01 $1,607.00 $555.50 $1,150.55 $1,105.52 $223.65 $90.00 $14.85 $2,997.661 $42,868.98• $71.20 $71.75 $124.43 $750.00 $1,017.38• $281,563.25• 85,145.00 u 0 i IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT TUE, SEP 22, 1992, 1:01 PM ----------------------------- ---- -- --- ---- ------ -- -- - - - - --- 1992 IMPRO.BDS R.P.UTILITIES LET #4 EST #2 GENERAL FUND COBORN ENTERPRISES INC. SR. BOAT TOUR FOR 46 DAYS INN ROOM RESERVATIONS DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DNR REGISTRATION FEES EARLE & MARIANN DICKINSON COVERED WAGON RIDE FOR 46 HUTCHINSON TEL CO SEPT PHONE SERVICE MCLEOD COOP POWER ELECTRICITY MINNTERTAINMENT COMPANY TOUR FOR 320 PEOPLE MPCA APPLICATION FEE N.Y.S.C.A. COACHING CERTIF PROGRAM PEACE LUTHERAN SR. YOUTH CITY WORKERS PICNIC PAYROLL FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 9 -18 WATER /SEWER FUND HOLIDAY INN AIRPORT LODGING- R.DEVRIES HOLIDAY INN CROWN PLAZA LODGING- R.DEVRIES HUTCHINSON TEL CO SEPT PHONE SERVICE $30,903.21 $30,903.21+ $299.00 $881.59 $163.00 $200.00 $3,773.00 $278.58 $690.00 $85.00 $240.00 $945.50 $7,555.67* $4,737.17 $4.737.17■ $59.00 $480.00 $394.95 $933.95* $44,130.00► page 1 • E 0 HANDWRITTEN CHECKS COUNCIL REPORT -- --- ---- ------------ ------ -- -- -- LIQUOR FUND Allen Office Bernicks Pepsi Cola City of Hutch City of Hutch City of Hutch City of Hutch Coast to Coast Coca Cola Diamond Ice Electro Watchmen Hermel Wholesale Hutch Leader Junker Sanitation MN Dept of Revenue MN Dept of Revenue Northland Beverage PERA PERA Withhold Tax Acct TUE, SEP 22, 1992 ------ ----- - - - - -- repair POP Aug employee ins lottery sales lottery sales lottery sales bulbs POP ice quarterly charge can coolers cty fair adv refuse charges penalty & int May tax Aug sales tax POP employer contribution employer contribution employer contribution TOTAL 62.82 53.68 1,225.68 1,125.00 194.00 167.00 16.15 469.25 748.30 118.22 31.20 95.00 166.78 894.72 11,393.68 611.00 181.40 174.00 323.16 $18,051.04 September 14, 1992 ARI - ; OLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 OF COLVSEL WILLIAM W, CAMERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL M. SEGICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" (612)567 -7575 FAX (612) 587 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNE]' G BARRY ANDERSON 58M CEDAR LAVE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MIXNESOTA 55416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 800- 34.'1-4545 PAX(6W)545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 389 -2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Cable Issues Our File No. 3188 -87001 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Dear Gary: IS I am enclosing herewith a copy of the Minutes of the most recent HCVN Board meeting which I thought the Council members might be interested in. One issue that did come up at our regular scheduled Board meeting had to do with the technical audit. As you may recall, the City Council was not willing to engage in the technical audit as a result of what appeared to be a very high likelihood of significant financial cutbacks. Fortunately, those cutbacks did not develop. Nonetheless, HCVN is of the opinion that a technical audit should be conducted relatively soon. We are entering into, or will shortly be entering into, negotiations with the new franchise holder for an extension of the franchise agreement. As you may recall, he has written the City on this issue and requested that such negotiations begin. In order to have any kind of reasonable baseline to carry on those discussions, we need to know the condition of the existing system. What information we have is almost entirely supplied by the local cable franchise holder or is based on the technical knowledge of our Board of Directors which also serves as the Cable Advisory Commission for the City of Hutchinson. While I am suitably impressed by the technical knowledge of our Board members, and it certainly is far greater than any knowledge I possess on the subject, a thorough audit is a requirement. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE HAS ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION DAVID B. ARNOLD GARY D. MCDOWEI.L STEVEN A,"DENSON • O. BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA E. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN PAUL D. DOVE" JOSEPH M.PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RTCRARD O. MCGEE CATHRYN D. REBER September 14, 1992 ARI - ; OLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 OF COLVSEL WILLIAM W, CAMERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL M. SEGICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" (612)567 -7575 FAX (612) 587 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNE]' G BARRY ANDERSON 58M CEDAR LAVE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MIXNESOTA 55416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 800- 34.'1-4545 PAX(6W)545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 389 -2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Cable Issues Our File No. 3188 -87001 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Dear Gary: IS I am enclosing herewith a copy of the Minutes of the most recent HCVN Board meeting which I thought the Council members might be interested in. One issue that did come up at our regular scheduled Board meeting had to do with the technical audit. As you may recall, the City Council was not willing to engage in the technical audit as a result of what appeared to be a very high likelihood of significant financial cutbacks. Fortunately, those cutbacks did not develop. Nonetheless, HCVN is of the opinion that a technical audit should be conducted relatively soon. We are entering into, or will shortly be entering into, negotiations with the new franchise holder for an extension of the franchise agreement. As you may recall, he has written the City on this issue and requested that such negotiations begin. In order to have any kind of reasonable baseline to carry on those discussions, we need to know the condition of the existing system. What information we have is almost entirely supplied by the local cable franchise holder or is based on the technical knowledge of our Board of Directors which also serves as the Cable Advisory Commission for the City of Hutchinson. While I am suitably impressed by the technical knowledge of our Board members, and it certainly is far greater than any knowledge I possess on the subject, a thorough audit is a requirement. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE HAS ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Mr. Gary D. Plotz • September 14, 1992 Page 2 I believe estimates were secured indicating that such an audit could be conducted for something around $3,000 to $5,000. If the City were to budget something in this range, I am sure an appropriate audit could be completed. I would appreciate hearing from you regarding this matter. In any event, I would ask that you pass this correspondence along to the Council so that the Council is fully advised on the status of this matter. Thank you. Best regards. Very tru G. Bare • GBA:lm Enclosure on Ll MINUTES • The Board of Directors for Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. met on Tuesday, September 8, 1992 at 6:30 A.M. at the 7 West Truck Stop. Present were all Board members except Don Hansen, who was beginning the new school year. Sue Potter reported on the progress in providing coverage for away games. Mark Schramm is training assistants at athletic events, principally football games, for access to the professional equipment owned by HCVN for editing and other purposes. By unanimous agreement, this was found to be acceptable by the Board. Mark Guggemos reported on problems with the quality of the signal which was solved by announcing on screen that the problem was not associated with HCVN and that interested parties should call the cable office. The problem or problems were fixed. The system has not yet been swept. Mark Marchart has reported that the equipment is on order and the system sweep will be conducted in the next four to six weeks. There was renewed discussion concerning the technical audit. Suggestion was made that the technical audit be conducted in 1993. There was discussion concerning the Cable Association meeting set for October 9, 1992. No decisions were made. • The Committee discussed the possible purchase of a van to be owned by the channel to carry the equipment from shoot to shoot. Mark Guggemos does have a van for sale for approximately $4,000. Sue Potter was directed to investigate the insurance situation relative to the equipment of the channel carried in the van as well as the cost of liability only coverage on the van. The van in question has a 305 V -8 and is a 1983 GMC Rally. Guggemos does have other potential purchasers and the Committee urged him to take whatever action was most appropriate for himself relative to the van. No decision was made regarding whether or not to authorize the purchase of the equipment in question. The policy of HCVN relative to political advertisements was reaffirmed. However, informative video tapes produced by the candidates, political in nature, are acceptable. Candidates and their committees will be asked to sign a release indicating that the tapes do not include requests for fundraising and that the committees are responsible for the content of the tapes. It was moved with appropriate second and passed to approve part -time help at approximately 10 hours per week at $6 to $8 per hour. The Coordinator was directed to address this issue and to make the appropriate selection. . There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 7:28. Respectfully submitted, Barry Anderson, President • FOR, YOUR INF0RMM0U BB/Hutchinson Leader 9/15/92 rea . headlines A r r J M .� .. Council stops egg processing The Howard Lake City Council has told Sonstegard Foods to stop inedible egg processing operations until the company receives a bio -Hi Permit from the state. Owner Phil Sonstegard was originally given the shut -down uldmau last March, but told the council that he was getting close to installing needed equipment to reduce odors. At that time he was given a 90 -day extension, but that deadline t Passed. Sonstegard said the Minnesota pollution Control Agency is c laying the process and has not yet approved the permit for the bio -file Sonstegard said it will likely take 30 to 60 days to get final approval the permit. The council approved a motion to force the business to stop operatio until Sonstegard finds out when a permit may be issued. At that time, t council will meet and allow the company to reinstate the processing a, will have 30 days from that point to install the filter. Howard lake Hera Fairfax denies library request The Fairfax City Council has rejected a request by Pioneerland Libra, System to increase the city's funding level Pioneerland Library Director John Houlahan [old the council that ac ditional funds were needed or cuts in programs would have to be mad He was seeking $12,085 from the Fairfax council, or $2,157 more tha last year. Council Member Brad Kiecker said the increase shows that maybe it time for the city w get out of the Pioneerland system Others said the would not support an increase in local taxes. The council voted to fund Pioneerland at last year's level, or $9,921; Fairfar Srandar, Cokato tax levy to drop Cokato property owners had reason to celebrate last week when the city council approved a tax levy that calls for a 4 percent drop next year Even though general fund expenditures will rise about 5.5 percent, the tax levy will drop because one municipal bond will be paid off. The council members said the proposed budget could drop even more by December, but it cannot legally be increased Enterprise Dispatch, Dassel and Cokato Buffalo Lake hires new administrator Dennis Sanvig of Crystal has been hired as the new administrator of the Buffalo Lake Nursing Home. He replaces John Richards, who has ac- cepted the administrator position at Bums Manor Nursing Home in Hutchinson. News'Mirror, Buffalo Lake, Cosmos and Hector Brownton considers new snow policy Tbe Brownton City Council is debating whetheP to expand its over night, no-parking ordinance to all of its streets . during winter Months. The ordinance, which calls for no parking between 2 and 6 a.m. for snow removal, applies only to Fourth Avenue North (Main Street). _ Council Member Ed Martineau suggested at the council's Sept. 1 mectine that thf- , ,, i,4,-:_ _,. 1 . 11 . .. s HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY 133 Third Avenue S.W. • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Telephone: (612) 587 -2168 FOR YOUR INF_ORMAILON Mr. Ed Ide McLeod County Auditor McLeod County Courthouse 830 11 St. E Glencoe, MN 55336 Dear Mr. Ide, I am writing in regard to obtaining the tax forfeited property available adjacent to Park Towers, parcel 823050 2400; 22 feet x 66 feet that we spoke about last week. Park Towers is a senior subsidized high rise operated by the Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The property would be used for additional parking for Park Towers residents. Hutchinson Housing Inc., a non - profit corporation, will be purchasing the property as they are owners of Park Towers • until the mortgage is paid, March 1994. At that time the Hutchinson HRA will own Park Towers. Enclosed is a check for $663.30 broken down as follows: 31 assurance 18.00 deed tax 3.30 recording fee 17.00 deed 25.00 $663.30 If any further information is needed, please feel free to call me any morning. Sincerely, Jean Ward Executive Director 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION 0 HUTCHINSON HOUSING, INC. REGULAR BOARD MEETING AUGUST 18, 1992 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER: BOARD ROOM PARK TOWERS APARTMENTS President Don Erickson called the meeting to order. Members present -Tammy Wendlandt, Lyle Van Hale and John Paulsen. Members absent - Shirley Wass. II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF JULY 14, 1992 There being no additions or corrections, Lyle Van Hale moved the minutes be approved as mailed. John Paulsen seconded and the motion carried unanimously. III. FINANCIAL REPORT The financial report was reviewed; John Paulsen moved that the financial reports be approved as submitted. Lyle Van Hale seconded and the motion carried unanimously. . IV. OTHER BUSINESS 1. Dobratz House Update Quentin Larson has estimated that updating the radiators will cost under $1,000. Tammy Wendlandt moved that the radiators be updated; John Paulsen seconded and the motion carried unanimously. A bid on vinyl and carpeting was received from Anderson Decorating Center; after discussion it was decided that at this time we would replace vinyl in the kitchen and bathroom only but would have the old carpet taken up. John Paulsen moved that we accept the bid on the Mannington vinyl for $372 along with $100 for take -up /prep of old material. Tammy Wendlandt seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Don Erickson presented a bid for grading and adding top -soil and for sodding. $1,125 was estimated for sodding; Don Erickson was requested to get back to us regarding whether this price includes laying the sod. John Paulsen moved that the prep work be approved; Tammy Wendlandt seconded and the motion so carried. Since not all bills have been paid, discussion was tabled until the next meeting on the procedure to be used in sale of the house. The Executive Director was requested to obtain from Barry Anderson, City Attorney his charge for conducting a sealed bid process. 9 • Page 2 Hutchinson Housing, Inc August 18, 1992 Board Meeting 2. Lease Agreement with Cellular 7 Phone Company John Paulsen moved that the Site Lease Agreement be approved subject to Barry Anderson's final approval; looking specifically at the option to renew clause to represent Hutchinson Housing, Inc.'s interest in that clause. Tammy Wendlandt seconded and the motion so carried. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Don Erickson declared the meeting adjourned. Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director Tammy Wendlandt, Secretary/Treasurer 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATI011 9 HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REGULAR BOARD MEETING AUGUST 18, 1992 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER: 2:00 P.M. BOARD ROOM PARK TOWERS Chairman John Paulsen called the meeting to order. Members present -Don Erickson, Tammy Wendlandt and Lyle Van Hale. Members absent - Shirley Wass. II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING JULY 14, 1992 There being no additions or corrections, Don Erickson moved that the minutes be approved as mailed. Lyle Van Hale seconded and the motion carried unanimously. III. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF ACCOUNTS FOR PARK TOWERS PROJECT AND GENERAL FUND Budget status and monthly disbursements were reviewed. Don Erickson moved that the financial statements be approved as • submitted. Tammy Wendlandt_ seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The Director informed the Board that the CD rates changed effective 7/14%92 so the CD could not be renewed at 4.07 as proposed at the last meeting; therefore, the CD has been renewed for three months at 3.75% IV. SECTION 23 /PARK TOWERS PROJECT 1. As of July 31, 1992 there are no rent receivables and there is one apartment vacant we are in the process of filling. 2. Adoption of new lease and grievance procedure. Lyle Van Hale moved that the revised lease dated August 18, 1992 and the grievance procedure dated August 18, 1992 be aprroved and adopted. Don Erickson seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 3. A draft of the 1993 budget was reviewed, along with a memo commenting on various proposed expenditures. After discussion, Tammy Wendlandt moved that admininstrative salaries be approved for a 4.02 raise as compared with the City of Hutchinson and Independent School District. Lyle Van Hale seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Don Erickson moved that effective January 1, 1993 the part -time director become a fulltime position with accompanying benefits. Park Towers would continue to pay half -time salary but would budget for half medical and dental benefits in the 1993 budget. Tammy Wendlandt seconded and the motion carried uanimously. The maintenance wage rate • Page 2 Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority Regular Board Meeting, August 18, 1992 for January 1993 has set and has changed from $9.74 to $9.58 per hour. After discussion, Don Erickson proposed that the maintenance position be given a 3.07 increase based on comparitive increases in the community. Tammy Wendlandt seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The Director will contact the HUD office to request the 3.07 increase prior to formal budget approval at the September Board meeting. 5. Park Towers has been awarded $369,314 in CIAP funds for window replacement. The next step will be submission of an implementation schedule to the HUD office. Lyle Van. Hale moved to adopt resolution #25 authorizing execution of amendment to the annual contributions contract due to the $369,314 CIAP award. Don Erickson seconded and the motion carried unanimously. V. OTHER BUSINESS 1. The Housing Task Force held its first meeting on August 6, 1992 to begin to identify_ the scope and objectives for a community housing program. To that end, a survey was proposed to obtain more information on the supply and demand of housing. A meeting has been se*_ up for September 9, 1992 to have task force members meet with Donn Winckler,Community Economic Development Specialist with Mid -Mn Development Commission to develop a survey Mayor Paul Ackland explained the purpose of the task force and that he would like to see the development of homeownership opportunities for low and moderate income persons along with possible public - private involvement in housing program development. The Board expressed its intent to cooperate with the task force to help accomplish its objectives. VI.ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Chairman Paulsen declared the meeting adjourned. Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director Tammy Wendlan t, Secretary Treasurer • PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING Municipal tltiitles Bldg.. Wltnar FOR Y August 10, 1992 DUR II rfQ Rrr1AT1 , Meeting was called to order by President Emery at 7:40 p.m. Rol was taken with 28 members present. • Motion to approve the minutes of the June 8 meeting. Sanders/Schoener. Motion carried LJ Finance Committee Report a. Motion to approve the Financial reports for June -July - Sanders/Bohn. Motion carried. b. Motion to approve the bills. LaCombe /Rudnirger - Motion carried c. Mr. Houlihan explained the Library Personnel (Gross Wages) Expenditure sheet and how the projected budget figures were arrived at. and also the Cash Flow sheet. There was some discussion re: Gross wages budgeted, as re: services increase and Maintenance of effort. John Houlihan also explained the $31,000 in total budget cuts Board members also receive an update on Certificates of Deposits Committee and project reports: a. Automation Committee report by Kreie - Committee members have been assigned to several subcommittees with specific areas to study and discuss. Jan Kreie explained that because of the cost we will be moving Quite slowly in this regard but that the project is ongoing. b. Policy Review Committee - Joanne Sneer reporting for absent Aisop. Spoke about the Americans with disability Act and also they have the first draft of the By Law revision. Communications: Kathy Mattson reported that the grant application has been approved and also that the last 1/4 payment of $74000 has been rec @Ned from the state. No Old Business: New Business a. Report of Associate Director 1. Monthly statistics stow a large increase in circulation time high of both circulation and new membership. 2. Library activities included: Sept. 22 - Para professional workshop Sept. 24 SAMMIE Annual meeting Sept. 30 Public Relations workshop Oct. 7 -9 MLA Conference for the libraries. Several libraries have reached an all b. Report of Director Will be meWg with Canby and Ciarkfieid Sept 19th. Meeting with McLeod County on August 25. Reviewed the standing of PIONEERLAND System in regard to other library systems in Minnesota We rank on the average of about 3rd in a field of 6. Mr. Houlihan's goal is that by 1995 -96 we will be first in all categories. Meeting Schedules: September 14 - Finance Committee Sept. 15 - Automation Committee Next full Board meeting - Nov, 16 Drawing Winners? - Parole or Prison Button - Baysinger 'Everything Everyone Should Know about Success - Joanne Sneer - Poftial Party Candles - Judy Bohn Adjournment - 8:48 D. Brunner, Secretary 0 August 19 1992 PLS Board meeting attendance . Present - Arlen LaCombe Judi Bohm Dorothy Tebben Mark Dahl Laverna Birldand Howard Christiansen Morris Benson Jan Kreie JoAnn Sneer Alvin T. Huff Marie Schooner John Miller Judy Barka Nancy Dickson Gale Dahlager Loma Carlson Orville Rudningen Lois Anderson Curtis Johnson Richard Baysinger Marion Drozdowski John Nevins Noel Phifer • Dolores Brunner Roy Johnsen Roy TengwaR Helen Mahn ke LeRoy Sanders Richard Emery Phdfip Kvam Barbara Gjerde > Janet Johnson Judy Sampson Sandy Casper > Maxine Weirrich> Kelley Johnson > Nancy Alsop > Melanie Lady John Schulstad Monte Matheson Kevin Mulder > Avonell Johnson Mary Lou Ame > 1] I ANNE 9/O4/9j 11:05:5) GUND LIBRARY PIIINIEMLAND LIBMARY SYSTEM INTLSRATEO FINANC14L SYS� REVENUE GUIDELINE COUNTY )4 IF$163 PAGE I AS OF 6/92 EGO: 9/04/92 10:46:31 PERCENT Of YEAR 67% • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CURRENT ACTUAL ACTUAL AOGT - ACT -- -- BUDGET THIS -KONTH YEAR -TO -DATE 01FFERENCE PIT •• 01 LIBRARY • 010 RECEI ►TS! 5100 RESERVE 34,819.00 .00 .00 34,839.00 0 5101 BASIC STATE /FEDERAL AID 445,949.00 .00 176.941.00 267,008.00 40 5110 BIG STONE COUNTY - 22,973.00 .00 17.229.75 S.743.2S 75 5115 CHIPPEWA COUNTY 71,339.00 .00 71.682.75 5,636.15 93 S120 KANOIYOHI COUNTY 119,400.00 .00 89.610.00 29.870.00 75 512( LAC DUI FARCE COUNTY 31,673.00 .00 23.734.73 7.918.25 75 512 MC LEDO COUNTY 78.944.00 19.736.00 7V,99y,0 L) .Om ,c1, SL30 MEEKER COUNTY 73,406.00 .00 $5.034.50 75 _ 5132 RENVILLE COUNTY 48,760.00 .00 36,S70.00 12,190.00 75 5135 SWIFT COUNTY 15,942.00 6.965.50 26,956.50 8,985.50 75 5137 MEDICINE COUNTY 25,204.00 .00 16,903.00 6.301.00 75 5140 _YELLOW APPLETON 9,677.00 .00 7.2S7.7S 2,419.25 75 S145 BENSON 19.353.00 .00 14.514.15 4,838.25 ITS 5148 FAIRFAX 9.928.00 .00 7,446.00 2.482.00 75 -- 5t So GLENCOE - 28,877.00 - .00 _ 21.651.75 7,219.25 Is 5155 GKACEVILLE 4.0)0.00 1.007.50 4.030.00 .00 100 FALLS 23.310.00 .00 11.482.50 S.827.S0 73 _5157 __GRANITE 5160 HUTCHINSON -- 63,053.00 31,526.50 63.031.00 .00 100 S16S KERKHOVEN 4.140.00 .00 3,111.00 1.037.00 75 5170 LITCHFIELO 44.991.00 .00 33.743.25 11.247.75 7S 5172 OLIVIA 22,337.00 S,S84.2S 22.337.00 .00 100 SITS ORTONVILLE 13,300.00 .00 9.975.00 3.325.00 75 5180 WILLMAR 101,856.00 .00 1_01..636.00 .00 100 SIBS BIRO ISLAND 9 26.00 _ 2.442.00 - _ 9.928.00 __ 5190 DAWSON 13,148.00 .00 9, "1.00 3,267.00 75 5195 6,681.00 .00 6.515.25 2.171.75 7S 1200 _HECTOR MADISON - 14.940.00 .00 _ - 11.20S.00 3.733.00 75 5205 RENVILLE 11.169.00 2.792.25 / /, /(p Q. U(T ,()n /OU 5410 CASH RECEIPTS L SALES TAX 50,000.00 2,817.20 27.IS5.77 22.844.21 54 1420 GIFTS 3.000.00 20.00 2.262.90 797.1 73 5430 INTEREST 6,100.00 209.65 )1.4)2.63 24.932.85- 464 • TOTAL RECEIPTS 1,456,741.00 75.160.83 1,036.108.27 420.632.17 71 • 020 REIM8USEMENTS (LOCAL GOM ANNINNOW SBO1 REIMBURSEMENTS- CHIPPEWA COUNT V(PERSONNEL 18.238.00 .00 15.000.00 1,236.00 82 5625 RE158URSEMENTS - OLIVIA (MATERIALS ONLY) 2.879.00 .00 3.769.09 910.09- 132 5830 REIMBURSEMENTS - BENSON (MATERIALS ONLY) 1.500.00 .00 I SO0.00 .00 too S640 REIMS - CHIPPEWA COUNTY (MATERIALS ONLY) 15.000.00 .00 ZSO.00 14.750.00 2 5850 REIMS - MONTEVIDEO (MATERIALS ONLY) 10.000.00 .00 10.005.00 S.00- 100 • TOTAL REIRSUSEMENTS (LOCAL GOVT) /- 47.617.00 .00 10,344.09 17,012.91 64 • 030 OtMER REIMBURSEMENTS 5970 OTHER REIMBURSEMENTS 3,300.00 $7.40 2,247.72 1,252.26 64 • TOTAL OTHER REIMBURSEMENTS 3,300.00 57.48 2,247.72 1.252.26 64 •_ 050 OTHER FUNDS _ 5905 AUTOMATION FUND 12,866.00 1.716.00 14,042.50 1.176.50- 109 5910 GLENCOE FUND .00 .00 100.00 100.00- 0 5920 KCWL 5,000.00 .00 5.368.76 S68.76- 111 • TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 17,666.00 1.716.00 19,711.26 1.843.26- 110 •• - TOTAL LIBRARY _- - 1.323,724.00 76.934.33 1,080,611.34 437,112.66 71 _*-0 FFINAL TOTALS - -- 40 ACCOUNT 1. S2 S. 724.00 16, 934.11 1,088,611.31 417,112." 7l • .', • PIUNFFRLAND I RY SYSTEM COUNTY 34 9/04/92 INTEGRATED F NCIAL SYSTEM IF5570 PA Gc 1 "i 15:08:16 01 FUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AS OF 7/31/92 EDD: 9/04/92 14:ZB:4d - LIBRARY - CURRENT YEAR ; OF ; OF - DESCRIPTION - MONTH TO -GATE BUDGET BOGT YEAR EXPENDITURES - SALARIES AND WAGES 76,838.90 •• 547,148.52 •• 944,379.00 •• 58 58 EMPLOYER'S SHARE HEALTH INSURANCE 2,708.32 •• 16,702.79 •• 30,000.00 •• 56 58 HEALTH INSURANCE - DEDUCTIBLE .00 •• 1.477.38 •+ 1,500.00 +• 98 58 EMPLOYER'S SHARE RETIREMENT INSURANCE 8,279.90 •• 60.813.91 •• 105,922.00 •• 57 SB BOOKS - ADULT 4.296.99 •• 47,955.52 •• 112.700.00 •• 43 58 -.- ..BOOKS - CHILDREN. ._ -_..__ -_ . -- 300.28 •• 17.290.50 •• 30.900.00 •• 56 58 $ GENERAL REFERENCE 162.67 •• 8,678.91 •■ 16,000.00 •• 54 58 PERIODICALS 710.52 +• 19,900.85 •• 35.000.00 •• 57 58 .` PAWP AtLEIS -.. __ _._.__�.._ ___- - - - -- .00 ++ 19.50 •• 100.00 •+ 20 SB OLIVIA LIBRARY MATERIALS .00 •• 4,089.15 •+ 4,867.00 •• 84 5 BENSON LIBRARY MATERIALS 30.95 •• 773.09 +• 1.437.00 ++ 54 58 FAIRFAX GIFT MATERIALS 9.87 +• 2.708.28 •• 2,869.00 •• 94 SB CHIPPEWA COUNTY LIBRARY MATERIALS 1,001.68 •• 14.926.05 ++ 20.548.00 ' +• 73 58 MONTEVIDEO MATERIALS .00 +• 2,858.01 •• 12,058.00 •• 24 58 I&MM.. FILMS ___ _.._ - .00 •• .00 •• VIDEO TAPES 16.97 +• 1.000.87 •• 5,000.00 •• 20 SB AUDIO DISCS AND TAPES 30.24 •• 848.88 •• 900.00 •• 94 58 _. __._SLIDES AND FILM STRIPS__._ -.. __ -_ .00 •+ .00 •• MICROFORMS .00 •• 96.50 •• 300.00 •• 32 58 BINDING .00 •• .00 •• 779.00 •• 0 58 OCLC AND OTHER CHARGES 8;535.00 •• 17.035.00 +• 16.600.00 •• 92 58 CON VENDOR CHARGES 250.00 •• 13,848.38 •• 18.550.00 •+ 75 58 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 2,011.56 •• 9,115.53 •• 16.000.00 •• 57 58 INSURANCE .00 •• 1,969.88 •• 2,685 -00 !• 73 58 AMORTIZATION .00 •• .00 •+ - TELEPHONE AND LINE CHARGES 932.58 •• 7.642.98 •• 14,175.00 •• 54 58 TERMINAL MAINTENANCE _.. .00 +• .00 •• 1,000.00 •• 0 58 t POSTAGE AND SHIPPING 1,103.40 +• 7.608.56 •• 13,000.00 •♦ 59 58 NEW EQUIPMENT 316.12 •+ 4.843.00 •• 4.250.00 •• 114 58 A/V EQUIPMENT .00 +• .00 •• MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS 444.84 •• 8,371.44 •• 18,000.00 - •• 47 58 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 100.71 +• 1,310.00 •• 1,500.00 •e 87 58 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - MONTEVIDEO .._.425.00 •• _ 2.975.00 _ !• _._ 5,100.00 58 SUPPLIES AND PRINTING 2,191.33 +• 16,018.78 +• 27.600.00 •• _$a {8 - - -- - 58 PROMOTIONAL AND PROGRAMMING .00 •+ •• 1.000.00 •+ 58 MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - STAFF 256.27 ♦• 659 605.89 72 4 ,.,900.00 •• •• 68 58 MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES 424.94 •♦ 3,488.33 •+ 5 5,600.00 ++ 62 58 PROF. MEM9ERSHIPS (TRUSTEES) .00 •• 306.00 •• 310.00 •• 99 SB INSURANCE .00 •• 11..460.00 •• 14,500.00 ♦• 79 58 i ADS AND LEGAL NOTICES .00 •• 100.00 •+ 500.00 •• 20 58 ' AUDITING 1.839.30 •• 3.539.30 •• 1.700.00 ' +• 208 $8 BOOKKEEPING 225.00 •+ 1,575.00 •• ++ 58 58 CONTINUING EDUCATION 54.75 •+ 401.38 +♦ 1 .700.00 1.000.00 •• 40 58 SCHOLARSHIP FUND .00 •• 97.25 •+ 1,000.00 •• 10 58 ..{ EXTENSION CONTRACTS .00 •• .00 •• 4.500.00 •• 0 58 MOVING EXPENSE - DIRECTOR .00 +• 1,244.45 •• 1,245.00 ++ 100 58 GLENCOE FRIENDS. 1903 .00 +• 47.72 •+ 1.362.00 •• 4 58 KCWL 755.66 •• 2,780.70 +• 4,515.00 •• 62 58 LOCAL EQUIPMENT 397.92 •+ 2,663.05 •+ 6.000.00 0• 44 58 STATE SALES TAX 439.67 +• 1.300.40 ++ 7.177.00 •• 18 58 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 115,093.34 •0 872 296.45 + 4+P• 1,52!,724.00 0000 $7 S8 SALAXCS OW BAWD 8/31/97 $58,990.06 .',