Loading...
cp01-22-1991 cI U TC HI I N S CO f CAL�:U; °�R � r f LVi� O January 20 , n JanuarX_26 V! E. EJ Iv 7 S UD ;6 i -23- 10:00 A.M. - Directors Me at City Hall 5:00 P.M. - Tree Board Meeting at Library Co Room pia lox i T HURSD.'.Y -24- 5:00 P.M. - Nursing Home Board Meeting at Burns Manor X7:00 P.M. - Hutcbinson Area Transportation Task Force Meeting at City Hall Auditorim {,7 ui'i L'rt 0 -21- L CITY OFFICES CLOSED ++H- "+f++++i F 9 i� H i i Y LUTHER KING'S BIRTHDAY FiLiDAY -25- CONFERENCE: RANDY DEVRIES - Jan. 24 -25 o -2 -2 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall -26- • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 1991 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Harold Kelm, Bethany Baptist Church 3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 8, 1991; Bid Openings of January 8, 1991 and January 17, 1991 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Financial Report - December 1990 2. Planning Commission Minutes of December 18, 1990 3. Senior Advisory Board Minutes of November 28, 1990 0 4. Airport Commission Minutes - January 14, 1991 5. Hospital Board Minutes of December 18, 1990 6. Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting Minutes of December 4, 1990 and January 8, 1991 (b) Snow Removal Permit 1. Jean Davison - Davison Northside Grocery 2. Donald Todnem (c) Popcorn And Concession Stand Permit for Mark McGraw (DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991) Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and issue permits 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. (a) Letting No. 3 - Project No. 91 -03 • 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991 . (b) Letting No. 4 - Project No. 91 -04, 91 -05, 91 -06 Action - Motion to close hearings - Motion to reject Motion to approve and order preparation of plans and specifications - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions 6. Communications. Recruests And Petitions None 7. Resolutions And Ordinances (a) Resolution No. 9408 - Resolution For Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (b) Resolution No. 9409 - Resolution Approving securities For Collateral From First Bank of Minnesota of Hutchinson; Minnesota Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 8. Unfinished Business (a) Consideration of Amending Small Cities Grant Program (DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991) Action - (b) Update On Luce Line Trail with Recommendation from City Attorney (DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991) Action - 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service 0 2 • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991 (b) Consideration of Awarding Contract for Demolition Or Removal of Buildings for Shopko Project, Phase I (Letting No. 15, Project No. 90 -25) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award contract - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9407 (c) Consideration of RCM Engineering Services Proposal for Water Distribution System Analysis Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (d) Consideration of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment for $8,901,238 Requested By Hutchinson Community Hospital Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (e) Consideration of Request By Nursing Home Board And Hospital Board for Authorization To Continue with Merger Process of Burns Manor And Hutchinson Community Hospital Action - (f) Consideration of Deleting Area Four From Tax Increment Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9415 (g) Consideration of Entering Into County /City Contract for Recycling Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (h) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of Wal -Mart Subdivision with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to Reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9410 • 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991 (i) Consideration of Rezoning From R -2 To C -4 for Wal -Mart Property with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second reading for February 12, 1991 (j) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Robert Hantge To Construct A Twin Home with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9411 (k) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Randy Anderson for Child Care Facility At Hwy. 15 South with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9412 (1) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Stacey Barclay, Auto Sales Store On Hwy. 7 East with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9413 (m) Consideration of Variance Requested By Bob Elliott with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9414 (n) Consideration of Final Plat for Houk's Subdivision, Submitted By Galen Houk (Two Mile Radius - Hassan Valley) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County (o) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Kevin Compton On Hwy. 15 North (Two Mile Radius) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County J 4 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991 (p) Consideration of Final Draft of Comprehensive Plan with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (q) Consideration of Awarding Car Impounding Contract Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (r) Consideration of Entering Into Lease for "Dry Dock" Youth Center Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement (s) Consideration of Agreement Between City of Hutchinson And Hutch, Inc. Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement • 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims. Appropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Adiournment i 4 • MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar and Don Erickson. Absent: Alderman Marlin Torgerson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend Sherman Buschow. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of December 11, 1990, spe- cial meeting of December 27, 1990 and bid opening of December 28, 1990 were approved as distributed. 4. ROUTINE ITEMS (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1990 2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 28, 1990 3. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 29, 1990 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990 5. FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 1990 (b) CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE 1. HUTCH BASEBALL ASSN. FOR AMERICAN LEGION 2. HUTCHINSON HOCKEY ASSN. FOR O'TOOLES (c) POPCORN AND CONCESSION STAND PERMIT FOR MARK MCGRAW (d) SNOW REMOVAL PERMIT 1. LLOYD CHRISTENSEN 2. RON HANSEN - HANSEN GRAVEL (e) APPOINTMENTS • 1. HEALTH BOARD: DR. ROBERT HEGRENES, DR. THOMAS KLEINKAUF AND DR. GEORGE SMITH CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 . 2. FIRE CHIEF AND FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to order the re- port and minutes filed, issue licenses /permits except for item (c), and ratify appointments. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to table item (c) until the next meeting. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M. (a) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 91 -01 Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M. and read Publication No. 4185. He then explained the process for public improvements and stated deferred assessments were available for senior citizens. The assessments were for a 10 -year period if not paid in full. Engineer Rodeberg reported that the project was for con- • concrete curb and gutter, street, alley and parking lot construction and replacement of some of the sewer and water lines. The Glen Street assessments would be fig- ured on the basis of a commercial street rather than a residential street. The residential people would be assessed for a 37' street. The additional cost would be a deferred assessment, and an adjustment would be made if the property changed from residential to commercial. There would be no assessment for sidewalk. Delores Brunner, 968 Hayden Avenue, commented on the old picture in the lobby and stated her house at 125 Glen S.W. was in the picture. Since the house is old, she wondered how much tax was paid on the property and how many streets it had paid for. She questioned how many times the same house could be assessed. She inquired if the duplex were to be sold as commercial property, would it be assessed residential or commercial. Mrs. Brunner asked if the alley behind her house would be paved. The Mayor and Engineer did not think the house had been assessed before. The previous policy was to tax the en- tire City for every improvement done in town. Louis Brunner, 968 Hayden Avenue, wanted to know where the money was coming from to pave a parking lot next • 2 . CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 door. He thought the money should be used for street improvements instead of parking lot construction. Engineer Rodeberg responded that a tax increment district was set up to pay for this project. It would not affect their taxes. Mr. Brunner inquired who requested the blacktopping on Glen Street. Engineer Rodeberg responded that the school district had requested it. Mr. Steve Drew, 15 Glen Street S., asked if the alley was going to be paved or what would be done to it. He stated the police station used the alley about 903 of the time and only four houses used the alley. He stated it would be nice to have it paved because of the traffic by the police station, but he didn't think the residents along there should pay for it to be done. Mr. Drew also inquired about sidewalk assessment. The City Engineer responded that the City set up an assessment policy for alleys based on benefit, accord- ing to the parking requirement for each unit. The police . station would have 22 units and each dwelling about two units. There would be no assessment for the sidewalk. Ms. Jodie Drew, 15 Glen Street S., stated they had lived at their present address for two years. The street was in need of repair, but the alley paving was not brought to her attention. The frontage would be assessed to her. They do not use the alley, but they are being jeopardized because they live next to the police station. She in- quired how many other houses are next to paved alleys. She inquired about the next step to object to the proj- ect. Mayor Ackland reported it was not the police department asking to have the alley paved. The police didn't care whether or not it was paved. A resident had requested it be paved to reduce dust. Ms. Kim Pearson, 146 Washington Avenue West, stated she knew the city needed some improvement work done, but she was not in favor of the assessment. Ms. Pearson asked about the future of the property and why it was consid- ered a commercial street. The City Engineer assured that she would not be assessed for commercial, if it was a residential property. The 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 0 oversizing for the commercial street would be deferred until the use of the property became commercial in na- ture. Mr. Lowell Pearson, 146 Washington Avenue West, asked if it would be a truck route. The answer was "no." The im- provements will not change the designation of the street. Mayor Ackland read a letter from the Hutchinson School District in support of the project and a letter from David M. Tewes, 127 First Avenue S.W., in opposition of the project. (b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 91 -02 Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:35 P.M. and read Publication No. 4186. Engineer Rodeberg presented a report on the project. Mr. Grant Olson, 1302 Delaware Street, stated his concern was the cost of the assessment and the money to pay for it since he was a student. He felt the project would be • worthwhile in the long -run, but it was not financially feasible for him right now. The City Engineer stated there were four houses in the area, and a mound system might work, but it probably would not cost much less. Mayor Ackland read a letter from Nghia and Cang Nguyen, 1318 Delaware, in favor of the project. (c) LETTING NO. 5, PROJECTS NO. 91 -07, 91 -08, 91 -09 Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:40 P.M. and read Publication No. 4187. PROJECT NO. 91 -07 Mr. Norman Hoefer, Green Castle, 250 Freemont Avenue, Apt. 103, inquired how this project would affect their building. He asked if there was something wrong with the present curb and gutter. Mr. Hoefer stated that the big trucks from the hospital project had added to the deteri- oration of the street, and he didn't feel it was fair that the residents were paying for the damage done by the trucks. He wondered why there would be a shut -off in the street. Mr. Hoefer also commented about an underground is 4 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 spring that was discovered during construction at the hospital project site. Engineer Rodeberg estimated the assessment to Green Castle at $16,000. He reported project No. 91 -07 was a state aid project. It was estimated that the State would pick up $65,000 of the $185,000 cost. It was stated that the majority of the project was to replace the street and put in drain tile for drainage. The tile line would not be assessed inasmuch as state aid would pay for it. Mayor Ackland read a letter from the Hutchinson School District in support of the project. PROJECT NO. 91 -08 Mr. Norman Bowen, 218 Fifth Avenue N.E., asked why the curb and gutter were being replaced. He stated that in 1971 he was assessed for water on the Fifth Avenue proj- ect and wondered if it would make a difference that he was assessed previously. The Director of Engineering commented that it didn't make • sense to only patch a street now, and then rip it up to construct watermain in a year or two. Therefore, the City was proposing to run a water main through the area and then repair the street. Residents would get a credit for street patching costs in last year's sanitary sewer assessment. The property owner on the corner lot of Bluff Street and Fifth Avenue commented he had slips from previous assess- ments. When his driveway was redone, the contractor put in a 2' taper instead of the existing 6' taper. Mayor Ackland stated that corner lots would only be assessed for one side, as noted in the City assessment policy. PROJECT NO, 91 -09 Engineer Rodeberg reported that no assessments were pro- posed for this project since it was a sidewalk replace- ment. (d) LETTING NO. 6, PROJECTS NO. 91 -10 6 91 -12 Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read Publi- cation No. 4188. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 PROJECT NO. 91 -10 Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer, Rt. 2, Hutchinson, (Schmidt - bauer's Fourth Addition) asked if he had to pay for the appurtenances. Also, he wondered if the driveways would be put in. PROJECT NO. 91 -12 No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -12. (e) LETTING NO. 7, PROJECTS NO. 91 -13 6 91 -14 Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read Publi- cation No. 4189. PROJECT NO. 91 -13 No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -13. PROJECT NO. 91 -14 No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -14. . Mayor Ackland read a letter from Dick Hennen, Hennen Fur- niture, stating opposition to Projects 91 -13 and 91 -14. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close the hearings at 9:12 P.M. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to approve and order preparation of plans and specifications for all projects, except for the alley portion of Project No. 91 -01, and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9400 - No. 9404. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. C COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) UPDATE ON LUCE LINE TRAIL Director Dolf Moon commented on the Luce Line Trail and signage, as well as a letter received from the insurance carrier. He stated the issue was an area of private property being used for a trail connection from the west end of the trail in Kimberly Park to the east end of the trail at the bass pond. • 6 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 Representatives of the Crow River Sno Pros snowmobile club stated the club would put the trail through and pro- vide signage at no cost to the City if the State would agree to groom and maintain it. Also, the club offered to assume trail liability under a special recreational coverage recently obtained. Following discussion with the DNR representative regard- ing the liability for insurance and unfinished trail, the City Attorney was directed to research the matter and prepare a recommendation for the January 22 meeting. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM LLOYD ALLEN REGARDING ACQUISITION CONTRACT FOR SHOPKO PROJECT Attorney Anderson stated there was a dispute between the City and Allen regarding his tenant who moved from an existing building to another one of Allen's properties. The contract stated Allen would be paid rent of $550 a month for five months; however, the City, present prop- erty owner, was not notified of the vacancy. Allen was now requesting rental payment and $325 for attorney fees. Following discussion and upon recommendation of the City Attorney, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve payment of rent per the contract and $325 attorney fees. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and carried three to one, with Mayor Ackland voting nay. Attorney Anderson reported that Twin City Testing had completed its study of the Shopko site, and it would be recommending to the MPCA no further clean -up of the tri- angular site or Mike's Mobil site, except for 400 cubic yards of minimal clean -up problem. The MPCA might want to put a tube into the ground and bring up the fumes rather than remove the soil. The buildings should start coming down in late winter or spring 1991. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION NO. 9388 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $137,500 FROM HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION (b) RESOLUTION NO. 9389 - DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER (c) RESOLUTION NO. 9390 - APPOINTING LEGAL COUNSEL (d) RESOLUTION NO. 9391 - APPOINTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR FOR • 1991 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 0 (e) RESOLUTION NO. 9392 - ENTERING AGREEMENT WITH PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 (f) RESOLUTION NO. 9393 - DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS AND INSTITUTIONS (g) RESOLUTION NO. 9394 - DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS (h) RESOLUTION NO. 9395 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA (1) RESOLUTION NO. 9396 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA (j) RESOLUTION NO. 9397 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON AS SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION (k) RESOLUTION NO. 9398 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (1) RESOLUTION NO. 9405 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA (m) RESOLUTION NO. 9406 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF HUTCHINSON AS SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9388 - No. 9398 and No. 9405 and No. 9406. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SMALL CITIES GRANT PROGRAM Ms. Connie Mangan, Small Cities Project Coordinator, re- ported on the three components of the grant. It was rec- ommended to move the Hutch Hotel funding to housing reha- bilitation. 11 8 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 Mr. Lowell Wakefield, owner of the Hutch Hotel building, requested the Council to defer this item to allow him time to develop the project. His proposal was to put eight or nine units on third floor, offices on second floor and retail on first floor. Nothing would be in the basement. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously car- ried, to table until next meeting. (b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LAGS AND LIMBS PURCHASE The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to award bid to highest bidder, Hutchinson Iron & Metal for $560. (c) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING PURCHASE OF FLASH GRAVITY STEAM STERILIZER FOR HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the purchase. • (d) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH MCLEOD COUNTY The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and enter into agreement. (e) CONSIDERATION OF HUTCHINSON AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and set up Task Force. (f) CONSIDERATION OF THREE -MONTH FREEZE FOR GENERAL FUND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Finance Director Merrill reported how the State's short- fall of revenues would affect the cities. It was his recommendation to put a three -month freeze on the general fund, motor pool and water /sewer funds for all capital expenditures, except for the CAD system previously ap- proved by the Council. At the end of this period, staff would review the plan with the Council and take appropri- ate action. • 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY S, 1991 0 Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the recommendation from the Finance Director for a three -month freeze. (g) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 POSITION CLASSIFICATION /PAY PLAN Administrator Plotz commented on the plan and stated it had the same merit system language as prior years, spe- cifically, eligibility on an employee's anniversary date of employment. Mr. Plotz reported he had completed a re- view of one of the directors and would be making an ad- justment within the criteria (% range) as the previous year, unless otherwise directed at this time. The range has been 0 -4% for those under mid -point and 0 -28 for those above mid- point, with a not to exceed 1.25% average for those employees over mid- point. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9399. (h) SELECTION OF COUNCIL'S VICE- PRESIDENT - JOHN MLINAR • The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to elect John Mlinar Vice - President. (i) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY M & P PARTNERS, ACOMA TOWNSHIP (TWO MILE RADIUS) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Erickson to refer to County with contingencies. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (j) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK (TWO MILE RADIUS) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to refer to County with no objection. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Plotz reminded the Council of the joint 10 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 meeting on January 14 with County officials. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM TOM CARRIGAN Engineer Rodeberg reported on a conflict between the City and Tom Carrigan regarding a field stone retaining wall erected by Mr. Carrigan on his property at 105 Paul's Road and Hilltop Drive. Mr. Carrigan stated he had to rent a bobcat to put the stones in place. Therefore, he was submitting the bill for $517.28 to the City for reimbursement. Engineer Rodeberg noted his letter to Mr. Carrigan dated October 12, 1990 and replied that the City clearly went out of its way to help him, but his response had been very uncooperative. The City agreement was to provide material only, not for the labor. Mr. Rodeberg also noted the wall was built on City property despite assur- ances it would be on his own property. City Attorney Anderson stated that Mr. Carrigan would be principally liable for the wall, and the City would have • some exposure of liability in the event of an injury since the wall was partially on City boulevard. Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to split the cost of the bill. Motion seconded by Mayor Ackland and failed on a split vote of two ayes and two nays. Mr. Carrigan stated he would not accept half the cost. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CRAIG LENZ Alderman Lenz suggested contacting MN /DOT regarding the intersection of Hwy. 7/15/22. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR Alderman Mlinar commented on the memo regarding passenger usage of the Hutchmobile service on New Year's Eve. It was the consensus of the Council that the availability of this service should continue. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Engineer Rodeberg requested approval for change orders on city projects No. 90 -11 and No. 90 -08. The motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and 11 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 unanimously carried, to approve. (f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND Mayor Ackland commented that in September the City con- tractor for tree removal dropped a limb onto adjoining property and damaged a garage roof. The damage amounted to $540. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to pay the $540 damage to property owner and turn bill over to con- tractor for reimbursement. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. 11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at • 11:00 P.M. is 12 0 MINUTES BID OPENING TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 The meeting was called to order at 12:00 Noon by City Administrator Gary D. Plotz. Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 4180, Proposal From A Development/ Owner, "Phase II" Shopko Project, was dispensed with. The follow- ing proposals were received: Super Valu Stores, Inc. Minneapolis Division Erickson's Diversified Corporation Hudson, Wisconsin The Everest Group, Ltd. Roseville, Minnesota • 0 The proposals were referred to staff for review. The meeting adjourned at 12:05 P.M. �S MINUTES BID OPENING THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 1991 The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill. Also present was Supervisor Doug Meier. The reading of Publication No. 4190, Notice Of Advertisement For Proposals On Car Impounding Contract, was dispensed with. The fol- lowing proposal was received: Lowell Baumetz Modern Mazda Hutchinson, MN The proposal was referred to staff for review. The meeting adjourned at 2:05 P.M. • N MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLA1411ING COMMISSION Tuesday, December 1E, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, Dean Hood, E1Rov Cobratz, Craig Lenz and Chairman Bill Craig. Ifembers absent: Tom Lyke. Also Present: Bu ilding Official Jim Marka and Building Inspector ;lark Hensen 2. MINUTES Mr. Flood made a notion to approve the minutes with corrections on page 2 of the regular meetinq dated Tuesday, November 20, 1990. Seconded by 1 1r. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -2 TO C -4 REQUESTED ON THE WALMAPT PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT The public hearing for the request is to be continued is to the February meeting. (b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION The public hearing for the request is to be continued to the February meeting. 4. NEW EUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED EY M &P PARTNERS ACOMA TOWNSHIP (2 RILE RADIUS) Building Official Harka commented on staff recommendations being the same as 6 months ago. There was discussion on research of the topography of the area. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the sketch plan contingent on satisfactorily meeting city staff and county requirements. Seconded by fir. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. (b) DISCUSSION OF SHCPY.O SITE PLAN • Building Official Marka updated the commission on progress of the project stating the site plan is very 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING CO1111ISSION MINUTES 12/18/90 preliminary. He explained that Shopko will present the completed plan to the city when ready. (c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK HASSAN VALLEY (2 MILE RADIUS) Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend - approval with no objection, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT ON 5TH AVE REQUESTED BY BOB SANSTEAD Withdrawn. (e) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY ROBERT HANTGE Building Official Harka commented on the request of constructing a Twin Home. He stated the transition would fit in with the present Townhouses in the Miller PUD. It was the consensus of the commission to recommend a public hearing on the proposal. 5. OLD BUSINESS (a) CONTINUING DISCUSSION REGARDING LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY Chairman Craig proposed continuation until after a meeting including all parties involved on Friday, December 28, 1990, in the city offices at 1:30 P.M. (b) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE - PROCEDURE There was discussion of changes and hoar to address them. Building Official Marka suggested all commissioners bring their questions and concerns to him and he will compile them. After that the commission could meet with Mr. Weber for questions and discussion. Mr. Marka will present an update of comments at the January meeting. (c) COb111UNICATION FR014 STAFF Building Inspector )Sark Hensen commented on his letter and responses by affected property owners on the Hwy 7 readdressing proposal. He stated there would be approximately 50 address changes. Discussion followed on the original addressing. Mr. Wood stated from the post office standpoint he would recommend the change. It was the consensus of the dommission for Mr. Marka and Mr. Hensen to talk to City Attorney Barry Anderson concerning Ll 0 • HUTCHINSON PLANNING C01414ISSION MINUTES 12/18/90 • the legality of the changes with or without platting. 6. OTHER BUSINESS (a) PROPOSAL BY BOB ELLIOTT Building Official Marka commented on a proposal by Mr. Elliott, Town and Country Tire, to remodel the Meade building on Washington Ave. for his business. Mr. Elliott then presented a sketch plan of the proposal requested and the parking, remodeling and reconstruction of the building. Discussion followed on the loading dock. Mr. Marka stated he is concerned about encroachment into the right of way. It•was the consensus of the planning commission to work with staff and return for a public hearing. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. 0 0 3 SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES Is November 28, 1990 Members Present: Mildred Jensen, Reub Holman, Lloyd Mueller, Marie Kaping Ex- Officio: Arnold Rotzien Staff Present: Barb Haugen O ld Business The Holiday Bake Sale was discussed: board members will call participants from mailing sheets to increase participation with the project. The CashWise hotdog sales will come up in April - at that time staff will contact the store to enlist the project. The Crow River Days Project went well; nearly 20 seniors were recruited to volunteer for this project. It was reported that the families of Lulu Hagen and Gerry Scieszka donated $100.00 and $50.00 respectively to the Senior Building Fund. ilew Business The 1991 contract between the city and the nutrition program has been approved with • an addition regarding lessee responsibility in th- daily cleaning of kitchen. Copies of the agreement are available at the Center office. The Board unanimously agreed upon an amount of $2000.00 to be deposited into the Building Fund Account. It was reported that the terms of Verna Hintz and Lloyd Piueller will expire at the end of the year. Mr. Mueller has agreed to stay on for another term; Mrs. Hintz will he retiring from the Board. Staff will be preparing an annual report of accomplishments, goals & objectives which will be reviewed at a future board meeting. It was reported that staff RuLy Hanner will be on vacation until January 2, and that staff Barb Haugen will request a maternity leave beginning in Mid -14ay. A work - study student has been hired to serve as building supervisor during evening rentals Staff reported on upcoming tours and activities to be sponsored by the Center during the upcoming months. Meeting adjourned at 10:40 am. 0 �Z 7�1 (s) MINUTES HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING . January 14, 1991 Meeting was called to order at 7 :30 n.m. by Dave Skaar. Members present: Jim Faber, Joe Dooley, Dave Skaar, Doug Meier and Mark Lopac Members absent: Mayor Paul Ackland, Dennis Kahl Motion made by Joe Dooley and seconded by Mark Lopac, to approve minutes of last meeting. Passed unanimously. It was decided to contact the following people regarding the use of their gas keys: Joe Canine - return key Al Johnson - return key Mike Shea - return key Walt Griepentrog - return key Ward Martens - inquire intentions Jerry Wright - inquire intentions Next meeting to be held February 25th, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. 1* Report submitted by Doug Meier 0 -1 1 - A (Y-) 0 HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - December 18, 1990 Large Conference Room - 5:15 p.m. Present: Dori Johnson, President Rich Myers, Vice President; Diane Gilmer, Secretary; Keith Weber, Trustee; Rev. Thor Skeie, Trustee; Marlin Torgerson, Trustee Absent: Dr. Dean Nissen, Chief of Staff Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator; Frank Seivert, Director of Finance; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Robyn Erickson, Director of Education and Marketing; Jan Conner, Medical Staff/ Risk Management Coordinator; Pat Halverson, Director of Mental Health Services; Gib Lehman, Director of Plant Operations; Robin Schoen, Hutchinson Leader; Dave Clutter, KDUZ Radio; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary Prior to the meeting, Erickson presented a review of results from their board self - evaluation surveys. The meeting was called to order by President Johnson at 5:50 p.m. Minutes of Past Meetings The minutes of the November 20, 1990, regular meeting and the December 6, 1990, special meeting of the board of directors were presented. Following discussion: Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Weber, to approve the minutes of the November 20, 1990, regular meeting and the December 6, 1990, special meeting of the board of directors as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes The minutes were presented and questions answered by Conner. No unusual comments were made. Old Business A. Trustee Evaluation Discussion of the trustee evaluation took place prior to the start of the regular meeting, as noted above. B. Project Update Peter Worthington presented the construction management report for the month. He noted that all framing was expected to be done by the end of December and sheetrocking finished by the end of January. Eighty percent of the ductwork was in place, and the mechanical /electrical rough -in was well along. The building was fully enclosed, except for the construction access, and temporary heat was on. Within the next couple of weeks the serpentine wall will be enclosed. The project cost issue activity report was reviewed. New issues not anticipated were discussed, including site concrete at the helipad and Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Two (B.) revising sprinkler mains at the hospital addition to allow for future expansion. Also discussed was the cost of adding a cooling air handler unit for the kitchen. The cost status report was presented. Worthington noted cost issues, stating the project remained well under budget. Over $200,000 had been saved according to the original contract reports. Question was asked on phase protection following a recent power outage at the hospital. Worthington responded that the hospital's service was being changed as part of the project, but phase protection was not included. Lehman stated that Gary Nations, Harty Elving's electrical engineer, was working on options for this. Elving was expected to visit the site on December 19 to review this, and options will be discussed. Lehman stated his preference for phase protection to be included as part of the project. The construction progress report was then reviewed, and projected completion dates were discussed. A plan was being developed to find a temporary home for Physical Therapy so the same -day surgery area construction can begin earlier than expected. Johnson thanked him for his optimistic report, and,Worthington and Lehman left the meeting at this time. C. Capital Expenditures The 1991 capital expenditure budget was presented and reviewed. Graves noted that the budget started out at $1,000,000, and he commended the efforts of department directors who reviewed and cut the proposed expenditures down to the requested $387,165.00. Following discussion: Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Gilmer, to approve the capital expenditure budget for 1991 as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. A. Reappointment of Consulting Medical Staff Reapplications for consulting medical staff privileges were presented and reviewed. Recommendation was received from the Executive Committee of the medical staff for approval. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Torgerson, to reappoint the following practitioners to the consulting medical staff: 11 Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Three (A.) No Changes in Privileges John Bowar, M.D. Kent Carlson, M.D. Robert Heeter, N.D. J. Milo Meland, M.D. R. Daniel Nelson, M.D. Robert Pollock, M.D. Robert Van Tassel, M.D. Additional Privileges Stefan Laxdal, M.D. Dhanush Prasad, M.D. John Stock, M.D. Michael Bromer, M.D. Mark Friedland, N.D. Martin Lipschultz, M.D. David Larson, M.D. James Presthus, M.D. John Uecker, M.O. Robert Nordland, M.D. Paul Sanderson, M.D. All were in favor. Motion carried. Appointments to the Medical Staff Recommendation was received from the Executive Committee of the medical staff and applications were reviewed for medical staff appointments. Following discussion: Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Weber, to appoint the following practitioners to the Medical Staff: Borislav Velkov, M.O., active staff privileges in surgery with specific privileges in obstetrics and gynecology; Nancy Ortlip, LPN, allied health staff privileges as a physician's assistant; and Richard Cervenka, DPM, courtesy podiatric staff privileges pending clarification of health status. All were in favor. Motion carried. C. Bylaws Change A change to the board bylaws was presented which specifies that hospital employees are trained to treat the age groups that person works with. The change is being made in accordance with JCAHO standards. The personnel director will police the job descriptions to specify age groups treated, and the QA committee will act as an umbrella to ensure all are monitored. Following discussion: Notion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Myers, to approve the bylaws change as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. 0 3. Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Four D. McLeod and Meeker Day Treatment Program Halverson presented information about a new day treatment program for children and a proposed agreement for provision of this service. The idea for the program came from recent children's mental health legislation. She told the board that children used to be evaluated locally and then be placed outside the home for the treatment period, but it was determined that reintegration for these children becomes very difficult. The modern day movement is to keep children in less restricted treatment settings, and counties now have specific requirements to have a children's day treatment program available to them by July, 1991. Anticipating this, a group of agencies came together to write a grant (one of just ten available through the State) to fund hiring a person to become a link between the school, caregivers and families. The team includes an educator, teacher, behavioral therapist and case manager. The program started with three clients but has grown to seven. A full - time mental health therapist is officed at the site, and clinical supervision is provided by Doctor Bob Beal. Halverson is involved in screening the program to ensure the people served are the people designed to be served. The board agreed that this program serves a valuable need in the community and thanked Halverson for her report. Prior to taking action on this report, the board next heard the quarterly C.D. program report. E. Ouarterly Chemical Dependency Program Report Halverson also presented an overview of the status of the hospital's C.O. program. She reported a rise in program growth since January of 1990. Program days have grown since September, when a competitor's office closed. The number of clients averaged 2.0 in January, 1990, and had grown to 12.4 in November. Forty percent of the program funding comes from Rule 25 state programs, and the remaining 60% comes from Medicare and private payors. The aftercare program had continued to grow, as well, averaging 20 -25 clients, including family members. On December 1, the program was split to allow for growth in that area, as well. After care has seen 90% of its clients through the first six months, which Halverson stated was a good percentage. She noted a staff change that took place when Ms. Joan Webster, the primary care therapist, left to return to Abbott Northwestern's program and Mr. Marty Sherman replaced her, noting he brought a lot of skills and is doing a good job. The program's objectives were reviewed, citing that staff continues to feel children between the ages of 5 and 12 years of age need to be reached. School outreach - develop relapse prevention program, and referral network from schools. tl , • Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Five (E.) Following discussion: Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Myers, to approve the agreement for children's day treatment services and approve the quarterly c.d. program report as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. F. Medical Director The board learned that Dr. Bill Petersen, vice president of medical affairs at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, agreed to serve as medical director at no charge (other than routine fees already paid LifeSpan). Credentialing will be forthcoming within the next month or so. G. Mental Health Planning The board was informed that an agreement has been entered into with Michael Groh to assist in determining future directions for the hospital's mental health services. No unusual comments were made. H. CEO Evaluation President Johnson appointed Skeie and Weber to assist herself and Gordon Sprenger of LifeSpan in evaluation of the CEO performance for the past year. Sprenger will contact the board members to arrange a meeting time to discuss the evaluation. I. Other 1. Sterilizer A capital expenditure request for a flash gravity steam sterilizer was presented for approval. This equipment was budgeted for $20,000 as part of the building program. Only two vendors manufacture this type of sterilizer; those vendors were contacted, and their bids were received. After careful examination of the bids, the surgery supervisor recommended acceptance of the lower bid from Castle Corporation at a cost not to exceed $22,146. Following discussion: Motion was made by Torgerson, recommend to the City Council gravity steam sterilizer from not to exceed $22,146. All w 0 seconded by Gilmer, to the purchase of the flash Castle Corporation at a cost re in favor. Motion carried. 2. Holiday Construction Open House Erickson invited the board to attend the employee open houses to be held on December 26 (for Medical Center employees) and December 27 (for HCH employees). 3. Estes Park Conference Erickson distributed information on upcoming Estes Park conferences for hospital trustees. Interested trustees were asked to contact the hospital to register. Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Six 4. Appreciation President Johnson requested a letter of appreciation be forwarded from the board to the Dietary department staff for their extra efforts during the past year, and mention was made of the many special meetings during the year. The press representatives at the meeting were also thanked for their coverage of board meetings. Hospital staff in attendance were also thanked for their contributions to the board meetings each month. S. LifeSpan Board Meeting Recap Myers informed the board that all LifeSpan hospital revenue budgets were reviewed by the LifeSpan board at their December meeting. All were submitted in the same format and generally had the same issues to look at. The range of price increases being requested was 7 -12%. All had significant increases in percentage of benefits (15 -15%). Discounts were generally an issue. Cambridge Hospital discussed a Medicare adjustment from three years ago amounting to $300,000, which resulted in a loss for them for the year. Minneapolis Children's Hospital is undertaking a $35 million project, building up three floors on site. The new CEO of Stevens County Memorial Hospital in Morris gave an update on their hospital's direction. Accounts Payable The accounts payable listing for November was presented. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to approve the attached listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements for payment in the amount of Statistical Report and Financial Statements The statistical report for November was next presented. Year -to -date admissions continued to be 5.8% less than budget and slightly less than one year ago, and average daily census continued to be about three patients less than a year ago, continuing the trend from earlier in the year. Average length of stay was 4.2, down from 4.5 one year ago. Average occupancy was 40%. November admissions were slightly off from October, and occupancy was 39.1 %. Utilization was down when compared to the previous month, but surgical departments continued to reflect significant increases in volume and reached a record number of cases for the month. Outpatient volumes continued to increase, reflecting the trend toward outpatient care. The financial statements were also presented. Year -to -date, gross patient revenues were 512,667,000, or about 1.4% more than budget; however, discounts were about $24,000 higher than budget, leaving a net operating revenue of $10,570,000, or 1.5% more than budget. Operating margin was $34,506 and, adding in the total other operating revenues left excess revenues over expense for 11 months of $310,388. 0 Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90 Page Seven Statistical Report and Financial Statements (continued) November patient revenues were $1,257,000, or 4% more than budget. Net operating revenue was just under $1,040,000, or 6.6% more than budget. Discounts were less than budget. Operating expenses were $1,061,000, or 13.3% more than budget, principally in salaries, benefits, supplies and other (including increased surgical supplies and MHU physician services) expenses. The hospital had an operating loss of approximately $24,000 for the month; however, when total other operating revenues of $34,000 were added, excess revenues over expense for the month totalled $9,811. Auxiliary Meeting Minutes Minutes of the October and November, 1990, HCH Auxiliary meetings were presented. No unusual comments were made. Adjournment Motion was made by Torgerson to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was then adjourned at 7:OS p.m. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Hulkonen Diane Gilmer • Recording Secretary Secretary LH HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BURNS MANOR/HCH TASK FORCE MEETING - December 4, 1990 Large Conference Room - 12:00 p.m. Present: Jim Mills, Chairman; Dori Johnson; Kay Peterson; Rich Myers; Marlin Torgerson; Don Erickson Others Present: Robert Koepcke, Burns Manor Administrator; Philip G. Graves, HCH Administrator; Patty McCullough and Brenda Fox, Health Planning and Management Resources; Duane Nelson, Charles Bailly & Company; Frank Seivert, HCH Director of Finance; Robin Schoen, Hutchinson Leader; Dave Clutter, KDUZ; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary The purpose of the meeting was to hear the presentation of the planning consultants regarding the feasibility of the proposed merger of the Burns Manor Nursing Home and Hutchinson Community Hospital. Patty McCullough introduced herself to the group and distributed the analysis of issues regarding the close working relationship between Burns Manor and HCH. The report highlights included the following: o Definition of market area; o Services available to seniors to the market area; a Trends in delivery of services to the elderly; o Congregate housing, assisted living and nursing home demand for the market area; o Perceived advantages and disadvantages in a relationships between HCH and Burns Manor; and o Conclusions and recommendations regarding an optimal service delivery system for the elderly in the Hutchinson market area. A map of the perceived market area was discussed. McCullough noted that the market area for a hospital can be very different from that of a nursing home, depending on the needs of the elderly in the area. The analysis of the socio- demographic was done by segmenting senior population by five -year increments with the exception of the 65 -69 market, and is a growth in all other segments of the senior market in the four zip code area studied. They looked at what types of services were available, primarily in the city of Hutchinson. Comment was made that, historically, Hutchinson attempts to coordinate services rather than spearheading new initiatives. McCullough's survey showed that 32% of hospital admissions are 65 years and older, and 47.5% of hospital patient days were for that age group. They also inventoried all nursing homes surrounding the market area for 1989 occupancy. Future trends were discussed, showing several major areas to emphasize for planning. Increased awareness and increased economic power of the senior population, increased service alternatives to the home, increased housing alternatives, decreased nursing home utilization will all need to be • addressed. The rise in disposable income of the elderly, using 1985 dollar&. was discussed. 4-A (G ? (gip Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting - 12/4/91 Page Two The projected need for nursing beds, assuming current population trends and no change in policy or service delivery, was discussed. A government study done by a government agency showed that the state pays 50% of nursing home bills (medical assistance dollars in MN). With the projected state budget shortfall, the assumption was made that only 143 beds will be needed in the year 2010. Also included in the report was a projected analysis of housing needs, assisted living demands and nursing home demands. McCullough predicted the nursing home market will become as competitive as the hospital business is now, because families now ask more questions, do more shopping for nursing home care, and will continue to do so. McCullough told the group they would discuss the perceived advantages and disadvantages at the next meeting. Because the two organizations don't have a long history of working together, there would be a lot of unknowns in this. Conclusions and recommendations were discussed. McCullough told the group she saw compelling reasons for integration and merger that will benefit the older person in the market area. Long term, the customer will benefit from some kind of merger or integration. Other business reasons for an integration include: o An integrated continuum of care for health and related services; allowing patients to enter healthcare system at one point. It was noted that a free - standing nursing home is going to have a tough time because of the financial resources needed to provide optimum services within the long term care system. o The ability to increase services and maximize reimbursement, specifically in the areas of marketing, personnel and education, without having to create a whole new department. o The ability to increase overall quality of care of older persons using the system. o The need for organizational strength to make major capital investments -- McCullough recommended one campus for both units to allow more involvement of physicians, to allow moving of persons to less intensive levels of care as soon as possible, and to better utilize staff. She recommended that the Burns Manor site be transitioned to an assisted living facility or combination model with both lower level case mix and assisted living in the same building. She then fielded questions from the task force. Myers requested addition of an issue to define the strategic intent on the part of the City as to what services they want to provide to residents. A recommendation to the City Council from the task force and both boards is needed, Torgerson stated, to suggest a long -term strategic intent to provide services to all income levels and all levels of need. I. . Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting - 12/4/91 Page Three A possible timeline was discussed. The key to finalizing the decision will be the financial analysis, which will be presented at the next meeting. By the end of January, an action plan and resources needed to have it happen may be identified. Graves questioned what would happen if Bailly finishes the financial analysis and finds no financial incentive. When asked if there are enough reasons to consider a consolidation regardless, McCullough answered yes, stating the process may be altered, but the long term benefit would be there. Myers agreed, but stated the market share of the future will change. Government is getting out of health care, and persons today are asking better questions, having perceived ideas of what they want and planning for what they will get. Nelson indicated that enough of his studies thus far indicate favorable financial figures. He felt the task force must look at more of an overall position because reimbursement might change, but his study will consider present regulations. He estimated the financial incentive could easily add up to $200,000 or better. An emphasis will be placed on attracting and retaining adequate staffing. Merging would be an advantage because of need to push nursing home wages up • in order to attract people. The nursing home would be at a real disadvantage without this. Johnson stated she has received many offers for older care nursing home insurance mail and sees a tremendous potential there. She suggested using the Hospital auxiliary as a tool to help reach and educate people in the community about the integration effort. McCullough responded that many congregate housing models have required renters to carry nursing home insurance. She stated she sees a lot of opportunity for Hutchinson to create a model service delivery system, where an assisted living facility could lease old nursing home space from the hospital. The next steps were summarized, with the administrators meeting to coordinate assumptions. The next two meetings will be set for January. The task force will want to be in a position to make decisions in January and make a recommendation to the City Council by the fourth Tuesday in January. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Hulkonen Recording Secretary • LH fn 41.1 . HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BURNS MANOR /HCH TASK FORCE MEETING - January 8, 1991 Multi- Purpose Room at Burns Manor - 12:00 Noon Present: Jim Mills, Chairman; Don Erickson, Kay Peterson and Dori Johnson Absent: Rich Myers and Marlin Torgerson Others Present: Phil Graves, HCH Administrator; Robert Koepcke, Burns Manor Administrator; Frank Seivert, HCH Director of Finance; Pat McCullough, Health Planning 6 Management Resources; Duane Nelson, Charles Bailly and Company; Robin Shoen, Hutchinson Leader; Dave Clutter, KDU2 /KKJR Radio; La Mae Maiers, Recording Secretary Members of the Burns Manor /HCH Task Force met to hear the results of the financial study recently completed by Duane Nelson, accountant from Charles Bailly 3 Company. The study was completed to determine the financial (impact) feasibility of a possible merger between Burns Manor and Hutchinson Community Hospital. Copies of the report completed by Charles Bailly 8 Company were distributed and reviewed. The results of the report appeared optimistic, favoring a C&NC arrangement. In preparing the reports Nelson stated he • had taken a conservative approach, and equalized benefit costs so as not to be discriminatory between the organizations. His report included a commentary and schedules presenting pro forma cost report adjustments /assumptions for the nursing home along with a Medicare type format relating to the Rule 50 stepdown. He also presented projected rates and pro forma projection for rate year beginning July 1, 1991. Nelson explained the effect of sharing services, allocating costs based on the Medicare stepdown cost report and the impact of adjusting salaries and benefits at the nursing home, to bring them more in line with the rates paid at the hospital for comparable positions. By increasing salaries and benefits at the nursing home, it is anticipated that the high turnover rate would be reduced and training costs decreased. Nelson explained further that in order to allocate costs between the two organizations on the Medicare Costs Report, services would have to be shared between the two facilities. Specific mention was made in the areas of dietary services and nursing services - -one dietitian and one nursing administrator. Operating costs would not necessarily be reduced, but would allow a more efficient use of the services, allowing higher costs at the hospital to be allocated to the nursing home, and the home would have the advantage of receiving services not presently available to it (e.g. staff dietitian). Services would also be shared in administration accounting, communications systems and laundry. Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting January 8, 1991 Page Two The current rate per day for residents at the nursing home was also addressed. Burns Manor's rate is lower than other nursing homes in the area and a rate increase is anticipated. Koepcke noted that the merger would give Burns Manor more support and resources to allow "continual operation" and the community and residents would be receiving a better product for their money. Overall, the reports indicated additional revenue could be realized from CSNC allocation and operational changes of approximately $612,000. Allowing for adjustments in the area of salaries and benefits, unemployment, workers compensation rate, and other areas, a (conservative) net change in cash flows is projected at approximately 5330,000. Long term goals were briefly addressed - -the possibility of a skilled bed facility at the hospital site and converting some present nursing home beds into an "assisted living" facility. It was noted that doctors are more willing to discharge patients earlier when a skilled nursing facility (SNF) is adjacent to the hospital. A SNF near the hospital also allows the physicians easier access and closer monitoring of their patients. A shorter stay in the hospital by Medicare patients would al 'so improve Medicare reimbursement to the hospital. At this point Burns Manor is not able to handle acute patients and, therefore, they stay in the hospital • longer and additional money is lost due to reimbursement. The financial report was based on receiving CSNC status July 1, 1991. Nelson and McCullough both stated timing could be of the essence. Although they do not anticipate any changes in the current requirements for CSNC status, it could be legislatively changed after July 1. Nelson and McCullough both offered assistance in obtaining CSNC status by that date. The task force members expressed optimism at the possibility of the merger taking place. Peterson requested more time to review materials before she voiced her recommendation. Following further discussion, a consensus was reached as follows: That Burns Manor and Hutchinson Community Hospital proceed with plans to merge the two organizations by July 1, 1991, under the following conditions and terms: - Further financial analysis confirms the preliminary estimates completed by Charles Bailly and Company; - Burns Manor completes a five -year projected cash flow analysis; - The two organizations' board of directors can finance the cash requirements necessary to effect the merger or present a plan to the city council that is acceptable to them for assisting with up -front cash requirement; • s - L . • Burns Manor/Task Force Meeting January 8, 1991 Page Three - That the merger will not adversely affect the sale of bonds to finance the remaining portion of the hospital construction project; and - Regulatory approval will be requested and granted. Discussion then ensued as to what immediate decisions need to be made should approval to proceed with plans to merge be granted by the city council. The following were cited: - Designation of a single governing authority; and - Appointment of a chief executive officer. In order to proceed beyond this point, the city council would have to empower the task force to continue with recommendations for a board of directors and a CEO, or a board of directors could be named and empowered by the city council to proceed with plans for the merger. A joint meeting between the Burns Manor Board of Directors, City Council, and Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors will take place on Tuesday, January 15, at 4:30 p.m. in the Large Conference Room of the Hospital. Pat McCullough and Duane Nelson will present a summary of their • findings to the full boards and council and also be available to address any questions. Jim Mills will be chairing the joint meeting. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 2:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, La Mae J. Maiers Recording Secretary LJM 0 �j. R r. M 0' " E SNO ........... horebyappliesl _PLOW AND P�d . ..... ..... upon that Metal, t of land d-crEbed as fallow L . ..... ...... . .... . . .- Bloek . .. . ....... ....... ..... .. plat or addition , _ . 11 11 � - 1.. 1 1 ; address . ................ . which is Of the following size an d arm; width feet; Imifth fat; area WITIIIN TILE CITY LIMITS . .......... - and hereb gree, th i ease wh P ,,, nit is ranted, eeli.11 whi hall i; used shalt � w ith thge that all walk whEch shall b d an d .11 p and therefor herewith submitt and With all the crdia o f j id_ . MTY OF IlLrrCIIINsoN applicable - ............ ................ - I . .. ............... ... ........... I ........ . ................. ... ........... 4 PPlicant further agrees to p,, f ees or asu .,,, ni , at i follows: it's time and 14 the amounts 1pwtfld'w $1.00 • .................... Owner MN JLC-eL1CA1i0jj FOR_�N'111 . NLMOVAL JUUT _p To as CO UNCIL .... . ........ of th* . . ... ................... . ..... . _ . . ........ . . . .............. co.'ay 'f — Mc LWO 1 .111 . . . . ......... .......... $tat# of MLnnasae, The un�lerjljned owner whose addres 4..__ hereby applies for o. permit t PLOW AND REMOVE SNOW W ............... I ..... . . ............. . .... ..... . ... .. - upon that certain tract If land described " follows : L Plat or addition ; address .. .. .............. . .................. wh0a is of th following size and area width feet; length feet; arm WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS and h agrees that, in e-91 each permit 1, granted, that a ll wor ), which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and 'PtCifieatlmw therefor herewith submitted and with all the orcitna o f s aid .. CITY OF HUTCH applicable thereto. If➢➢liMat further agrees to pay f ees a ,. folloWl: at the liens and in the amounts s p ee lfla' as $1.00 ............... ............ ................. .................. . ......... . .......... ..................... . ..... ........... .. ......... 1,6 NVP Owner APPLICATION FORsNOw eEMOVnL ... _ PERMIT To as ofth cuy ... ..................... _ .. . ................. ... ....... . . .. . .... ................... .... the County of State of Minnesot The undersigned owner whose address i ..... ... 1 ;4- R r. M 0' " E SNO ........... horebyappliesl _PLOW AND P�d . ..... ..... upon that Metal, t of land d-crEbed as fallow L . ..... ...... . .... . . .- Bloek . .. . ....... ....... ..... .. plat or addition , _ . 11 11 � - 1.. 1 1 ; address . ................ . which is Of the following size an d arm; width feet; Imifth fat; area WITIIIN TILE CITY LIMITS . .......... - and hereb gree, th i ease wh P ,,, nit is ranted, eeli.11 whi hall i; used shalt � w ith thge that all walk whEch shall b d an d .11 p and therefor herewith submitt and With all the crdia o f j id_ . MTY OF IlLrrCIIINsoN applicable - ............ ................ - I . .. ............... ... ........... I ........ . ................. ... ........... 4 PPlicant further agrees to p,, f ees or asu .,,, ni , at i follows: it's time and 14 the amounts 1pwtfld'w $1.00 • .................... Owner MN POPCORN STAND APPLICATION FOR ....................... PER1biIT City Council Cit ..................o ............ Huthi. liS_ QD..._..........................._....... ...................._........in the Coun o• o, t,4,? _ .............._ _. ..........y......._......._..., f �J T McLeod ..... I...... ....... . State of .Ifinneso!a: iS\ The undcrsegned ouvter whose address ie 831 Second Ave Southwest ...._ ........... .. ..... . . . .. � .. jl. `I . Hutchinson MN 55350 _..,,... .. .. , ... .. hereby appZies for a permit tah ..... ... ..... ... operate a Popcorn Stand at the southwest corner of the Public Square ; .... . ... .... _.......... ............ . ... u on fiat re�d tract of ianrl ds =cribcd as foliou•s: Lot- ___. . _._........ . _ ; Block r.Irt nrrddici.;n .........._.. ... addre. ^s..._......_..... ......___.. ._._.__._ ; U 7 u•v :> oT ;re Tcl:c, :ng si :e and area; uidth .__ _ eel; Ier.,' c:r ..._ ...._.... ..... .I ... .. .... . .. . ..... ... .. _.. ........ . ....... .... _ ..... ..... ......__....._..; c•.1"; I,crti,:j c =rc,s that, in case such permit is franted, to all work uicich shall be done and all materials u•ltieh shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor her<uith sulrm.ittcd oral i.ith all the ordinances of said ....... ..._..........._........ '.t? _..........._...... . .- ........._.............. - .. ........... ......... ...... , _disable thereto. • lrpZicant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specifed as j o1lo:cs: $50.00 Fee for One Year ...................................................................................................................................... ............................... .---................................ ............................... x...... . <,� Hdrk MC Owner 4-ct' PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 10TH, 1991, AND ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 17TH, 1991. NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 3 PROJECT NO. 91 -03 Publication No. 4197 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.H. on the 22nd day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of the Main Street Redevelopment Area from 2nd Avenue N. to 3rd Avenue S. by the construction of Watermain Services and Appurtenances for the Downtown Sprinkling Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $118,800.00, with an estimated $118,800.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $237,6CO.Oo. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: January 4th, 1991 ItRI k.� -Q '�c� City A45inistr or PLEA:,E NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. 40 ,,-�—]1, �� (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 PUBLIC HEARING - Letting No. 3 Tuesday, January 22, 1991 - 8:00 p.m. Downtown Sprinkling Water Services And Appurtances for the Downtown Sprinkling Project The project was proposed to bring water service to the 12 buildings indicated below, which have been noted as requesting or requiring sprinkling. A number of estimates have been produced for serving these and other properties by several different options. This estimate range is based on separate services for each non - adjoining property, and a system running along the sidewalk. The estimate is approximate only and could vary when in -depth design and permitting review is undertaken. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $144,000 - 237,600 Properties Proposed To Be Served • 1. 23 Hain Street 2. 8 Hain Street 3. 7 Main Street 4. 2 Main Street 5. 14 Main Street 6. 24 Hain Street 7. 30 Hain Street 8. 114 Hain Street 9. 126 Main Street 10. 130 Hain Street il. 133 Main Street 12. 218,228,238 Main Smith /Hennan Furniture) The following is based on previous memos and letters and discussions with staff. It is not proposed as is, and is subject to review and revision. Internal Sprinkling Estimate $155,000 Proposed to come from $238,000 HCDC Revolving Loan Fund N N N N S S S S S S (Carney's) S (Hair Gallery) Street S (Dick Proposed Funding (Aubony) (Home Bakery) (Ingleman Design) (L. Meyer) (Brinkman Studio) (H &R Block) (Aquaria Pets) (Alrick's) Downtown Sprinkling Estimate $144,000 - 237,600 $83,000 proposed to come from HCDC Revolving Loan Fund (Remainder of above). The rest is proposed to come from City Sewer /Water Funds ($61,000 - 154,600) Assessments (Internal Sprinkling Only) Structures with no remodeling $ .50 /square foot Structures with $5,000 - 10,000 of remodeling $ .15 /square foot Structures with over $10,000 of remodeling $ .00 /square foot �, ' I FIRST AVENUE a,..... i I s.. a... am.,. i . s ... 4' au.. SECOND AVENUE z I z Q � 2 LL I i i • E I i....� —�I - — 1 p p w �d w f�LI uj N u I L� SOUTH • P I "� I I — AVL ..M .. I.• r... ......... II WASHINGTON r � J I- W W R r I N NORTH AVENUE SOUTH P I "� I I — AVL ..M .. I.• r... ......... II WASHINGTON r � J I- W W R r I N NORTH AVENUE SOUTH PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 10TH, 1991, AND ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 17TH, 1991. NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 91 -04, 91 -05, 91 -06 Publication No. 4198 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 22nd day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of : PROJECT NO. 91 -04: Hassan Street from 5th Avenue S.E. to Oakland Avenue by the Construction of Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -05: Ivy Lane from Oakland Avenue to 7th Avenue S.E. by the Construction of Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -06: 6th Avenue S.E. from Hassan Street to Jefferson Street by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for wi;ich property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $31 2 400.00, with an estimated ;217,000.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $248,400.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: January 4th, 1991 City Adm nistrat PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. 40 • (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 PUBLIC HEARING - Letting No. 4 Tuesday, January 22, 1991 - 8:00 p.m. Hassan Street Project 91 -04 Ivy Street Project 91 -05 6th Avenue SE Project 91 -06 Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Surfacing, and Appurtances Estimated Project Cost 11 Hassan Street $192,000 Ivy Street $ 30,000 6th Avenue SE $ 26,400 TOTAL $248,400 Estimated Apportionment Total Estimated Project Cost $248,400 City Share $ 31,400 (Sideyard benefit, Sidewalk, Sanitary Sewer, etc) Estimated Assessable Share $217,000 Typical Estimated Assessment (66 ff Lot) E Residential Street Surfacing (66 ff @ $32 /ff) $2,100 Residential Curb and Gutter (66 ff @ $6.10 /ff) $ 400 Residential Driveway $ 600 - 1,200 Typical Estimated Assessment (66 ff lot) $2,100 - 3,700 RESOLUTION NO. 9408 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR 4" Water Meter —a— $1,030 Resale Water Yes Water Products Co. The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR Date Approved: January 22, 1991 O otion made by: Seconded by: Resolution submitted for Council action by: 7 —A 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9409 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the First Bank of Minnesota of Hutchinson, a City depository, has presented as collateral $100,288.43 as follows: DESCRIPTION RATE MATURITY AMOUNT Fed. Home Loan Bank 10.0 03 -25 -92 $100,288.43 0 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi- ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe- keeping. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 7_1p. FIRST �- NATIONAL BANK OF :� P0. Box 39 Glencoe, JIN 55336 612.564 -3161 15012 Hwx. 7 'xlinnctonka. ,AIN 55345 612.933 -9550 • • GLENCOE /MINNETONKA January 16, 1991 Honorable Paul Ackland City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Paul, I would like to thank you and the City Council for the extention of time in which we have reviewed the Small Cities Development Program Grant (SCDP). My accountant Mr. Benshop has met with Mr. Burnhagen and Ms. Connie Mangan regarding the January 10, 1991, memorandum from Mr. Gary Plotz setting forth the requirement from the city. I have concluded that it is not fensible to enter into such an agreament with the city to redevelope the hotel property due to it's terms and requirements. I would again like to thank you for the necessary extention of time. Very truly yours, FIRST N. IONAL BANK s�ua✓ Lowell G. Wake field Chairman LGW /sd cc: Gary Plotz City of Hutchinson (612) 587 -5151 'CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 TO: Mayor and City Council q ` FROM: Connie ManganCl V \�� —\-- January 4, 1991 RE: BUDGET REVISION REQUEST TO SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Attached is the budget Revision Request for The request adds additional administrative funds rehabilitation project. Vickie Rephs, Dept. of opment suggested an extension of the program for would allow two building seasons for the housing allow sufficient time to close out the program. the Small Cities Program and adds the housing Crade and Economic Devel- one year, to December 1992, rehabilitation program and As of December 31, 1990, 20 loans totaling $425,532.35 have been made: Commercial: $389,823.35 SCDP 282,621.93 • HCDC 107,201.42 Apartment: $ 35,709 SCDP 25,889.03 HCDC 9,819.99 I am proposing moving $5,000 from apartment rehabilitation and $30,000 from commercial rehabilitation for administration. This would leave $92,901.07 of SCDP funds (72.5% of the loan amount) for commercial loan, and $31,948 of SCDP funds (72.57 of the loan amount) for apartment_ rehabilitation. I am also proposing to delete the Hutch Hotel project and to add a housing rehabilitation program (see memo of 12/24/90). The Housing Rehabilitation proposal will use $265,000 for housing rehabilitation loans and $35,000 for administration of the housing rehabilitation program. CM /bb • 6 R AN 'I'NUMBER : SCDP - 00- 0002 -0 -FY 8 GRA E'F.:CITY OF H UTCHINSON RIMSRIN I IIQIT: '1 1'Itt))li('TT'ITLI MATN9TRFnT T1PTOI -M PrIIAJ3 P v BUDGET SUMMARY ADIUSTMI ?NT' REQUESTED REVISED CI IAN(ili APPROVYD/ M , BY AC IVITY CURRENT BUDGET RF"QUESThD ISUDGBT DISAPPROVED y Artivitt" SCDP OT IIIAl TOT SCDP 0 "T IIER TOTAL SC DP OTHFR TOTAL 9a Apartment rehab 72657 53704 126361 (5000) 18616 13616 67657 72320 139977 m y j LMI O O 9a Apartment rehab 12000 -- 12000 5000 -- 5000 17000 -- 17000 M Adm. pj m O rte"' C) M 9b Commercial rehab 406523 226650 633173 (30000)(25048) (55048) 376523 201602 578125 j slums and blight M �! R7 9b Commercial rehab 38250 - -- 38250 10000 - -- 10000 48250 -- 48250 j 0 adm Y m n 9a Hutch Hotel 300000 643000 943000 (300000) 0 (300000) 0 0 , 0 O i LMI O 9a Hutch hotel 8500 -- 8500 -- - -- -- 8500 -- 8500 n adm 13 Gen. Administration 25000 -- 25000 15000 -- 15000 40000 -- 40000 9a Housing rehab 0 0 0 265000 0 265000 265000 -- 265000 LMI 9a Housing rehab 0 0 0 40000 0 40000 40000 -- 40000 administration 3 Water entrances -- 300000 300000 -- 300000 300000 M m at Rehab Project O O "10 I'ALS 862,930 923,354 1,786, 84 862,930 573,922 1,436,8 I 2 i AdIk Ask I w qw w (612) 587 -5151 ITY OF HUTCHINSON VASN/NG TON AVENUE WEST ;NINSON, MINN. 55350 11 E It 0 R A N D U It DATE: December 24, 1990 TO: Hayor and City Council FROM: Connie Mangan W, R:E: At(F.ND1!ENT TO SMALL CCIT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Your consideration and approval is requested to submit a request for amendment to the Ninnesota Depaitment of Trade and Economic Development to delete the Hutchinson Hotel Rehabilitation project and add a housing rehabilitation program to the Small Cities Grant. When the City of Hutchinson was awarded $862,000 from the Small Cities Development Program, $300,000 was for the rehabilitation of the Hutch Hotel into housing for low and moderate income people. In 1989, the apartment rental situation charged dramatically. During 1989, 208 apartment units were added to the market and the need for the project was questioned by the Hutchinson Community Development Corporation (HCDC). The HCDC set up a Task Force to study the question. It was the opinion of the Task Force that the Hutch Hotel posed score serious problems for redevelopment: 1. Parking would not be available in close proximity to the project. 2. Project would not cash flow even with S300,000• as an outright grant. 3. Downtown location of project not appropriate for the need for 3 and 4 bedroom apartment units. Based on this the Task Force recommended that the $300,000 be used for ether housing needs in Hutchinson. John Bernhagen and I discussed a grant amendment with Vickie Reph of the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). DTED confirmed that under the Small Cities Program, the 5300,000 awarded t'e Hutch Hotel project has to be used for a housing related project within the downtown area. Of the various housing proposal John and I proposed DTED preferred a housing rehabilitation program for the older neighborhoods on the east and crest side of plain Street, from the river south to Oakland • Ave. (see attached map). The proposed housing rehabilitation program guidelines are attached. The amendment will also include a request to extend the grant from December 31, 1991, to December 31, 1992. (see attached budget). 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES 1. Income - Low and Moderate Income Households Those families whose incomes are less than: Household size 1 $18,700 2 21,350 3 24,050 4 26,700 5 28,350 6 30,000 7 31,750 8 33,400 2. Eligible Rehabilitation Health and safety items are required to be fixed first Housing Rehabilitation Needs: Exterior Interior Roof Electrical Siding Plumbing Foundation Furnace Exterior Doors Bathroom Fixtures Storm Doors Linoleum Windows Interior Doors Insulation Kitchen Cupboards Egress Carpet Garage Interior Painting Other Interior Patching 3. Maximum Rehabilitation Loan Amount: $12,000 4. Loan Term: 0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of house. HOUSING REHABILITATION BUDGET 25 loans at an average of $10,600 - $265,000 Administration 35,000 $300,000 L n U Hutchinson Community Development Corporation Board of Directors t✓;,�r�i��iv Wednesday, January 2, 1991 Chamber Meeting Room Directors Present Others Present Keith Weber -Vice Chairman John Bernhagen -Exec Dir John Mlinar Kathleen Skarvan- Chamber President Phil Graves Connie Mangan Bill Craig Larry Fraser The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Keith Weber. Motion was made by Graves, seconded by Mlinar and carried to approve the minutes of December 5, 1990. Motion was made by Mlinar, seconded by Fraser and carried to approve the Treasurer's report. Bernhagen reported on the 'Star City" recertification process. The Business Retention Survey has been completed and forwarded to D T E D. Bernhagen will summarize in report form the activities of 1990. Our 1991 Work Plan is ready for action at this meeting. A Star City Self assessment tool was distributed to the board to be returned to the office which will also be included as a part of the Annual Report. The 1991 Work Plan was presented by Bernhagen. These objectives were suggested by the board at a previous meeting. They were then reviewed by Chairman Bullard and Bernhagen for continuity and consistency. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded by Craig and carried to approve the work plan and goals as presented (Work Plan and Goals are a part of these minutes). The board reviewed the 1990 Work Plan. Bernhagen furnished an update of the various activities. Fraser and Bernhagen reported on a business proposal made to the Business Innovation Center(BIC) now located in Granite Falls. Redwood Falls was selected by the SIC board based on several factors, i.e. - central to the eighteen county area it serves and a subsidized rent provided by the city of Redwood Falls. Connie Mangan and Bernhagen presented a recommendation for amendment to the SCDP grant for an alternative use of the S 300,000. allocated for the Hutch Hotel. These monies are to be used for Low and Moderate housing rehabilitation and must be in the geographic area of the original targeted area for the grant. • IM An HCDC Real Property Task force had determined that using these dollars for the Hotel posed some service problems and that the money be used for other housing needs in Hutchinson. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded by Craig and carried to +• recommend to the City Council they submit an amendment to the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) as follows: 1. Use the S 300,000. designated for rehabilitation of the Hutch Hotel for Low and Moderate apartments for use on housing units in an area bounded on the West by Glen St., Century Avenue cn the South, and the river on the North and East. 2. Rehabilitation would be for qualified low and moderate income people with priority given to owner - occupied units. 3. Maximum rehabilitation Loan amount is $12,000. 4. The loan would by at 0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of house. A mortgage lien would be filed on the property. 5. $ 35,000. would be set aside for administration and be completed by December 31, 1992. Graves reported on a Transportation Study with the City, County and DOT concerning fringe road dealing mainly with the traffic of State Highways 15 & 22. Bernie Knutson, Chairman on the HCDC Transportation Committee will serve on this study committee. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. LI 0 t ` " 612) 537-5151 C 7°ppt c� A� A�Ap (��.,�T I tl V �" B - J l'✓ �CJ 37 WASHINGTONAVcf�'fJEWcST HU7CHINSON, MILAN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 22, 1991 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Water Billing Department SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for'the month of Jan Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts for the month of January. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday, January 28th, 1991 at Noon. . 2- 670 - 0303 -097 Research Realty HUD #271241613203 220 S 2nd Suite 320 Minneapolis MN 55401 303 Lynn Rd 20.72 3- 380 - 0405 -051 David 1'reund 225 Washington Av W Hutchinson MN 55350 405 Erie St S 108.47 3- 380 - 0525 -003 Helena Wright 525 Erie St S Hutchinson MN 55350 525 Erie St S 97.04 cc: Randy Heuer 1914 No Demon Ave Kissimmee FL 32741 • 2- 670 - 0032 -072 1- 515 -0903 -041 Randy Stille M.i):es Self Sery 32 Lynn Rd 105 Main St 11 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 32 Lynn Rd 903 Hwy 15 S 35.71 41.25 2- 670- 0230 -077 1 -570- 007.6 -002 Mike Keeler R J Wyttenhove 230 Lynn Rd 200 W 78th St Hutchinson MN 55350 Richfield 1.111 55423 230 Lynn Rd 16 Jefferson St S 157.72 390.77 Promises 1/22/91 cc: Citizens Bark & Trust 2 -710- 0727 -093 c/o Bonnie Westniller 2- 670- 0400 -019 102 I -lain St S John Sandahl Hutchinson MN 55350 400 Lynn Rd Hutchinson MN 55350 1- 680 - 0040 -071 400 Lynn Rd Cafe 132.00 195 1`ina Lane 1 Prorises 1/28/91 Merritt Island F1 32952 40 Main St S 2- 670- 0619 -085 645.25 Rick Weispfennig cc: Milburn Henke 619 Lynn Rd 631 Maison Av Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson 1.114 55350 619 Lynn Rd 114.99 2- 350 -0840 -064 John Athey 2- 675 -0544 -031 550 Clinton Ap r101 Keith Krormenhoek Hutchinson MN 55350 544 Madson Av 840 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 145.10 544 Madson Av cc: Warren Nelson Foute 1 Box 30 162.45 1'.stchinson MN 55350 Promises 2/1/91 Promises $20 /wk beg 1/18/91 2 -710- 0406 -071 Brian Geirsdorf 2 -650- 0575 -042 406 Merrill St Vernon Hartf-.eld Hutchinson MN 55350 575 Linden Av 406 Merrill St Hutchinson. MN 55350 164.65 575 Linden Av 37.14 2 -710- 0727 -093 cc: Monica Piffer Steve Rick 575 Linden Av 727 Merrill St Hutchinson 1 1 . 1 4 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises Feb 15, 1991 727 Merrill St 99.45 • • 2- 035- 0505 -057 Tim Eggersgluess 505 Second Av SW Hutchinson Mld 55350 505 Second Av SW 112.57 2- 035 - 0540 -023 Jay Henninger 540 Second Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 540 Second Av SW 98.88 cc: Joseph Pa,`.fel Route 1 Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises 1/31/91 2- 035 - 0840 -097 Wilton Soderberg 840 Second Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 840 Second Av SW 177.90 035- 0841 -082 • Debra Bondhus 841 Second Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 841 Second Av SW 124.65 2- 050 - 0635 -083 Karna Robinson 635 Third Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 635 Third Av SW 163.39 Promises 1/31/91 2- 310 - 0934 -021 George H Nelson 934 Church St Hutchinson MN 55350 934 Church St 144.60 2- 350 - 0344 - 071 Gutormson Est c/o Joan Paulson Rt 1 Box 43 Silver Lake MN 55381 344 Dale St 187.44 Promises 1/25/91 2- 350 - 0354 -044 Geraldine Elliot 354 Dale St Hutchinson IIN 55350 354 Dale St 129.16 2 -350- 0505 -021 Richard Mattson 505 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 505 Dale St 124.44 2--465- 0550 -084 Don Hilmanouwski 550 Harmony Lane Hutchinson MN 55350 550 Harmony Lane 57.13 2 -465- 0626 -081 Chris Johnson 626 Harmony Lane Hutchinson MN 55350 626 Harmony Lane 121.18 2- 470 - 0540 - 044 Brad Burich 540 Harrington St Hutchinson MN 55350 5 =0 Harrington St 69.82 Promises 1/25/91 2- 470- 0715 -031 E Duesterhoeft 715 Harrington St Hutchinson MN 55350 715 Harrington St 205.23 Promises $1C:- 2 /15,bal -2/28, (612) 587 -5151 f/!/1CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCH/NSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Award of Bid - Letting No. 15, Project No. 90 -25 Demolition of Structures Located in Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1 Attached is a tabulation of bids for the above - referenced project. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc., as the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $36,800.00 It is understood that a Notice to Proceed will not be given until all required documentation is provided, and a Pre - Construction Conference is held. • JPR /pv attachment a 9-d' RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT RESOLUTION NO. 9407 LETTING NO. 15 PROJECT NO. 90 -25 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Demolition of Structures Located in Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1; bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Amount Bid Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. $ 36,800.00 Fell Trucking & Excavating $ 37,361.45 E & T Contracting, Inc. $ 44,969.00 R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. $ 48,565.00 Wickenhauser Excavating $ 69,500.00 Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. $ 79,925.00 Structural Specialties $ 80,558.00 EnviroNet, Inc. $ 99,808.00 Duininck Bros., Inc. $121,204.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. of Hutchinson, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. of Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 0 I L 11 BID TABULATION CITY OF HUTCHINSON C] r L LETTING NO. 15 PROJECT DATE 90 -25 Demolition or Moving of Structures Located in Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1 12 -28 =1990 BIDDER SURETY AMOUNT DELIVERY Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. RR 2, Boa 179 $36,800 Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612 ) 327 -3133 Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc. 831 Park Ave., P.D. Box 247 79,925 Hamburg, MN 55339 (612) 467 -2720 Duininck Bros., Inc. P.O. Boa 208 121,204 Prinshurg, HN 56281 (612)978 -6011 Landwe r Heavy Moving, Inc. 846 S. 33rd St., P.O. Box 1086 St. Cloud, NN 56301 Larson Excavating, ILnc. 800 S.E. Hwy. 10 48,565 St. Cloud, NN 56304 (612) 654 -0709 Wickenhauser Excavating Villa St. Cologne, MN 55322 69,500 (612 ) 466 -5653 E & T Excavating, Inc. 845 Hwy. 7 West 44,969 Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -6948 Quade Electric 35 -4th Ave. N.E. Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -3030 Ed Rettman Excavating 564 Hassan St. Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -7733 Rickert Excavating, Inc. RR 1, Boa 242 Brownton, NN 55312 (612) 328 -4475 9- 121 BID TABULATION CITY OF HUTCHINSON LETTING NO. 15 Demolition or Moving of Structures Located in PROJECT 90 -25 Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1 DATE 12 -28 -1990 BIDDER SURETY AMOUNT DELIVERY J 6 M Tanks Div. of Stewart Energy Products Bog 219, Stewart, MN 55385 1- 800 - 223 -2971 Fell Trucking 6 Excavating Rt. 4, Box 216 $37,361.45 Waseca, MN 56093 8 Kennedy Exc., Demo. 6 Motor Co. East Hwy. 12 Benson, MN 56215 612 842 -4911 Mathiowetz Construction Co. RR Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 (507 ) 794 -6953 Contracting Services Independent 3339 W. St. Germain, Box 1594 St. Cloud, MN 56302 (612) 252 -7471 Structural Specialties P.O. Box 502 80,558.00 Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -6719 Duane Ritter 7120 Vernon St. Rockford, MN 55373 (612) 477 -5649 EnviroNet, Inc. 99,808.00 7351 Washington Ave. S. Edina, MN 55439 -2407 44- E; 3 (612) 587.5151 11 2 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 16, 1990 TO: _ Mayor and City Council FROM: Randy DeVries SUBJECT: Water distribution system analysis The Hutchinson Water Department is requesting a water distribution system analysis be performed on our water system by RCM. The Minnesota Department of Health has in its letter dated November 30, 1990, recommended that a study such as this be conducted to determine the adequacy of the system and the need for increased water storage facilities. • This study will provide our staff information on future system improve- ments, and the best possible location for the third elevated tank, along with a proposed year to be constructed. The study will also show if there is a need for an additional river crossing for a water main. This study will be a valuable tool for the future needs of the Hutchinson Water System. Money was budgeted for this work in 1991, and I recommend approval to RCM for $15,640.00 plus reimbursable mileage and printing cost estimated at $750.00. cc: Gary Plotz Ken Merrill John Rodeberg Dick Nagy RD /ds J 9 -c� 0 December 27, 1990 Mr. Randy DeVries City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: Engineering Services Proposal Distribution System Analysis RCM File No. 14042.00 Dear Mr. DeVries: In response to your request, RCM is pleased to submit the following proposal to perform a water distribution analysis for the City of Hutchinson. Based upon our discussions, it was deemed advisable to perform a distribution study prior to the final site selection for a third elevated storage tank. The last system wide distribution study was performed in 1969. Many changes have (����� taken place since that time, both in the City's growth pattern and expansion of the water supply and distribution system. rleke RCM proposed to perform a hydraulic analysis of the present distribution Carroll system, incorporating the existing elevated storage tanks and high service Muller pumping facilities, using the Kentucky Pipe software. The final model will � ass n ss q ociates, Inc. be calibrated based upon hydrant flow test and pressure reading in the arcl�rte�cls present system. Using the modified model, current deficiencies will be lard surveyors determined and recommend main improvement proposal. An analysis of future distribution system improvements and possible elevated tank sites will e ppodundy be made based upon future anticipated demand for both maximum day and fire flow demands. We propose to perform the above services for a lump sum fee plus reimbursable expenses. Based upon the scope of service presented in this proposal, we estimate the following levels of efforts and cost associated with each major task. Task CQI 1. Obtain Existing Data & Inventory Water System 2. Establish Demands 3. Establish Supply and Storage Requirements 4. Analyze Distribution System 5. Prepare Preliminary Reports 6. Meetings 7. Final Report TOTALS 0 Reimbursable mileage and printing cost estimate 10901 red circle drive box 130 minnetonka, minnesota 55343 612- 935 -6901 $1,260 950 680 7,220 2,630 1,430 1.470 $15,640 750 9- 0 The above estimates are based upon a comprehensive analysis of the City's water distribution systems and include levels of effort we feel appropriate . for this study. We have included the City's assistance on hydrant testing and pumping tests, as offered, to develop these fees. The preliminary report will be reviewed with your staff and the City Engineer prior to final printing. We are open to negotiating the proposed scope of work and level of effort as may be desired by the City to effectively meet your needs. Based upon the proposed scope of work level of effort, RCM estimates we can easily complete the study within three months of the City's authorization to proceed. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, I will be happy to discuss them with you. We are looking forward to continuing serving you, with your water supply need. Very truly yours, RIE L CARRQLL ULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. , y(/1 G., Charles S. Barger, P.E. CSB /na c: John Rodeberg, City Engineer \J minnesota department of health division of environmental health 925 s.e. delaware at. p.o.box 59040 minneapolis 55459 -0040 (612)827.5180 NOV 3 0 1990 Hutchinson City Council c/o Gary D. Plotz, Administrator Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Dear Council Members We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an investigation of your municipal water supply. If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, • please communicate with Mr. Mark D. Sweers, P.E., Public Health Engineer, Minnesota Department of Health, South Central District, Nichols Office Center, 410 Jackson Street, Suite 150, Mankato, Minnesota 56001, telephone number, 507/389 -2501. Sincerely yours, Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor Public Water Supply Unit Section of Water Supply . and Well Management' ROC:MDS:Ijd Enclosure / cc: Mr. Richard Nagy, Water Superintendent V S 0 an equal apportunity employer Hutchinson Municipal Water Supply June 20, 1990 . RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. A solenoid controlled prelubrication line with a valved bypass should be installed to replace the continuous prelubrication line on all wells. 2. The average daily water usage greatly exceeds the guideline of providing a minimum one -day water storage capacity. We recommend that a study be conducted to determine the adequacy of the system and the possible need for increased water storage facilities. 3. The opportunity for additional training in water supply work should be made available to the operator(s). Attendance at the annual waterworks operators seminar, held in the area, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in this field. "rwe, P.E. Public Health Engineer Section of Water Supply and Well Management 1] U J M hutchinson community hospital _ a Li!eSpan'- member 1095 Highway 15 South, Hutchinson, Minnesva 55350 • Te'ephone 6'2'587 -2145 January 17, 1991 The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and Members of the City Council City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members: At their regular meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, the Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors considered a request, which requires your approval. The following reflects discussion and recommendation on that request: " Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment The Board received an Amendment to the GMP from M.A. Mortenson Company for the expansion and • remodeling of the hospital in the amount of $8,901.238. This amendment incorporates the contract amount included in the original July 10, 1990 GMP document as well as changes identified to date. The GMP establishes a fixed limit of construction costs, but does not include contingencies for design or changes initiated by the hospital (see attached letter and GMP). Following discussion: "Motion a was made by Weber, seconded by Skeie, to recommend to the City Council acceptance of the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment, in the amount of $8,901,238, from M.A. Mortenson Company. All were in favor. Motion carried. The Mayor is requested to sign all three original copies enclosed and return to the hospital to my attention, if approval of the GMP is granted. Thank you for your consideration of these requests. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, HUTCHINSON COMMUNIJY,HOSPITAL Philip "G Graves Administ ator PGG:lm Enclosure 9--D M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY 700 Meadow Lane North Mi 612.522 -2100 FAX: 612. 520.3630 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 710 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440 December 6, 1990 Hutchinson Community Hospital 1095 Highway 15 South Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attn: Mr. Phil Graves Re: Hutchinson Community Hospital GNP Amendment to Contract Dear Phil: Article 3.4 of the Owner \Construction Manager Agreement stipulates that no fixed limit of construction cost is established as a condition of that agreement "unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed • by the parties ". Enclosed are three copies of Amendment No. 1 to the Contract Agreement between Hutchinson Community Hospital and M.A. Mortenson Company which formally establishes a fixed limit of construction cost (hereafter referred to as the GNP). This amendment incorporates the contract amount included in our July 10, 1990 GNP document, the scope change cost issues identified to date, as well of the contractor Alternates and H Alternates. The amounts shown on the Amendment have been included in previous Construction Management Monthly Reports. The three original copies enclosed with this letter have been signed by M.A. Mortenson Company. Please have the Mayor sign and return to our office two executed originals of this Amendment. If you have any questions regarding this Amendment I will be glad to meet with you at your convenience to review it with you. Very trulyy / ours, �� vV Peter Worthington Project Manager File: Owner Contract File cc: Gib Lehman - Hutchinson Community Hospital • Greg Funk - M.A. Mortenson Company OHices in Minneapolis. Rochester, Grand Rapids. St. Paul, MN • darner. Colorado Springs, CO • Seattle, WA 0 HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL Income Statement for Months Ended Decae6er 31, 1990 and 1909 MONTHLY ANALYSIS CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO SIDGET CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL Dee 90 %of pee 90 %of Increase percent REVENUE S EXPENSE ................. Actual ............................................................... Total Budget Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE 1,153,206 100.002 1,197,549 100.00% ( ",313) -3.70% Pollcy Discounts and Free Care (20,908) -1.01% (13,750) .1.57% (2,158) 11.51% Governmental Oiscounts (211,080) ............ - 18.30% ------------ (167,228) - 13.96% (43,852) 26.22% NET OPERATING REVENUE 921,218 ............ 79.88% 1,011,571 --- 54.47% (90,353) -8.93% OPERATING EXPENSES: 79.881 ............ ............ ..................... a7.42% ..........."........ ........... I......... Salaries 534,203 ".32% 489,903 40.91% K, 300 9.04% Benefits 106,587 9.24% 112,198 9.37% (5,611) -5.00% Su MLIes and other expenses 293,920 25.66% 326,606 27.27% (30,686) -9.40% Depreefatlon K, 125 3.63% 40,245 3.36% 3,880 9.64% Interest 13,175 1.14% 11,504 0.96% 1,671 14.53% Total Operating Expense ............ 994,010 ............ 66.20% 960,456 ..................... 81.87% 13,554 1.38% OPERATING MARGIN ............ (72,792) ............ -6.31% 31,115 ..................... 2.60% (103,907) - 333.95% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) • 23,004 1.995 26,6" 2.22% (3,640) - 13.662 NET INCOME (LOSS) ............ (49,786) N \MNNN ............ -4.32% 57,759 I \tNN \ \M ..................... 4.82% \N (107,547) \ \M \ \t \fM - 186.20% \Nta CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL 9 =� Dec 90 bf Dec 89 bf Increase percent REVENUE 6 EXPENSE Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Ver(atta ................. TOTAL REVENUE ............................................................... 1,153,206 100.00% 943,902 100.00% 209,3" 22.17% Policy Discounts mend Free Care (20,906) -1.81% (8,710) -0.92% (12,198) 140.05% Goverr>•ettal Discounts (211,080) - 18.30% ............ (109,992) - 11.65% (101,068) 91.902 MET OPERATING REVENUE ............ 921,218 ............ 79.881 ............ 825,200 ..................... a7.42% ..........."........ 96,018 11.64% OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries 534,203 46.32% 499,311 52.90% 34,892 6.995 Benefits 706,587 9.242 113,961 12.07% (7,374) -6.47% Supplles and Other expenses 295,920 25.66% 273,306 20.95% 22,614 6.27% De(xeelation ",125 3.83% 32.187 3.41% 11,938 37.09% Interest 13,175 1.14% 3,672 0.39% 9,503 258.805 Total Operating Expanse ............ 994,010 ............ ............ a6.20% ............ 922.437 ................... 9/.73% 71,573 .. 7.76% • OPERATING MARGIN TOTAL OTHER REVENIE (EXPENSE) (72,792) 23,004 -6.31% 1.9911 (97,237) 19,16{ ..................... - 10.30% 2.03% 24."5 3.06 - 25.14% 20.012 ............ ............ ..................... MET INCO (LOSS) (49, 7m) -4.321 (78,069) -8.27% 2a,281 - 36.23% \NNpNNe \N a \ \ \ \e \Ne \ \ \e.O..M 9 =� WtCNINSON NOWITAL Inca.a Statea»nt for Periods Ended December 31, 1990 and 1909 TTD ANALYSIS TTO ACTUAL TO IKDGET TTO ACTUAL TO ACTUAL TTD Dee 90 Zof TTD Dee 90 bf Increase Percent REVENUE 8 EXPENSE ----------------- Aettrl ............................................................... Total kdgst Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE 13,820,207 100.00% 13,6M.No 100.00% - 133,317 0.975 Policy Dlscants and Free Care (207,009) -1.50% (179,307) -1.31% (27,782) 15.49% Gp arrrentsl Otaccunts (2,121,691) ............ - 15.35% (2,079,930) - 15.20% (41,761) 2.01% MET OPERATING REVENUE 11,491,427 ............ 83.15% 11,427,653 ..................... 83.49% 63,774 0.56% OPERATING EXPENSES: ............ ............ ..................... 1,149,301 11.11% Salaries 5,715,041 41.35% 5,434,962 39.71% 280,079 5.15% 8enef its 1,261,445 9.13% 1,211,510 8.85% 49,935 4.12% sLwtles and other expenses 3,951,033 28.59% 3,683,538 26.91% 267,495 7.26% Depreciation 475,429 3.K% 482,931 3.53% (7,502) -1.55% Interest 126,765 ............ 0.92% 138,035 1.01% (11,270) -8.16% Total Operating Expanse 11,529,712 . _._.. - - - -.. ............ 83.43% 10,950,976 ............ ..................... 80.01% 578,736 5.28% OPERATING MARGIN (38,285) -0.28% 476,677 ..................... 3.48% (514,962) - 108.03% TOTAL DINER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 298,886 ............ 2.16% 317,200 ............ 2.372 ..................... (18,314) -5.77Z NET INCOE (LOSS) 260,601 .rase....... 1.89% 793,877 aaa\aaauu 5.80% ......ae\\ooaa\\v (533,276) - 67.17% TTO ACTUAL TO ACTUAL 9-D. [ • TTD Doc 90 bf TTD Dee 89 %of Inereaae Percent REVENUE It EXPENSE ................. Actus( Total Actual Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE ............................................................... 13,820,207 100.00% 11,824,150 100.00% 1,996,027 16.88% Paltry 01&Counts and Free Cue (207,009) -1.302 (175,333) -1.482 (31,756) 18.112 GOVernaentat Oiseounts (2,121,691) - 13.3511 (1,306,691) - 11.052 (815,000) 62.37% MET OPERATING REVENUE ............ 11,491,427 ............ ............ W.IS% ............ 10,342,126 ..................... 87.47% ..................... 1,149,301 11.11% OPERATING EXPENSES: Sa(ariee 5,715,0(1 41.35% 5,121,299 43.31% 593,742 11.59% cord its 1,261,445 9.13% 1,087,681 9.2031 173,762 15.982 Supplies and other expanses 3,951,035 28.59% 3,446,069 29.142 506,964 14.65% Depreciation 475,429 3.44% 361,147 3.07% 112,282 30.92% Interest 126,765 0.92% 41,354 0.35% 85,411 206.54% Total Operating Expense .."" """ 11,529,712 - 83.4331 "-- - - - -"' 10,059,552 ..................... 85.0831 1,470,161 14.61% OPERATIMG MARGIN ............ (38,285) ............ -0.2831 282,574 ..................... 2.39% (320,859) - 113.555 TOTAL OTHER REVEUE (EXPENSE) 290,886 ............ 2.162 ............ M,616 2. "It 10,270 3.56% MET INCO (LOSS) 260,601 1.8931 571,190 ..................... 4.5131 (110,589) •54.3831 \ \Aa\ \soars \aeM�aaa \\ ..... . \see \e \a.... 9-D. [ • AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN • HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (OWNER) AND M.A MORTENSON COMPANY (CONSTRUCTION MANAGER) DATED JULY 19. 1990 The following modifications are hereby made a part of the Agreement between Owner and Construction Manager for the expansion and rem.odelin. to the Hutchinson Community Hospital. 3.4.3 This amendment establishes a fixed limit of construction cost, hereafter referred to as the Guaranteed Maximus Price (GMP). The GMP is the total sum authorized by the Owner for Construction Costs. The GMP does not include contingencies for design or Owner initiated changes. 3.4.4 The amount of the GMP is Eight Million Nine Hundred One Thousand Two Hun.!red Thirty Eight Dollars ($8,901,238) determined as follows: Contract amount per 7/10/90 GMP document $ 7,871,911. Alt. #1 Dining Room Expansion 70,621. Alt. #3 Mental Health Outpatient Offices 131,903. Alt. #4 DDC Controls 89,144. Alt. H1 Fire Protection Upgrades 442,095. Alt. H2 Nurse Station Remodel 102,702. Alt. H3 In- Patient M �ntal Health Remodel 42,537. • Alt. H5 Er..?'.oyee Facilities 85,591. Alt. H6 Dietary Expansion 16,349. Parking Lot Revisions(PR #1) 20,791. Excavation and Wall at On -Call (PR #2 - Item 2) 5,197. Revise grading at Alternate HeliF id (PR #3) 572. Add storm drain at Alternate Helipad 1,295. Duct Design Revisio,is at Area M (PR #4 - Item 1) 13,321. Extend keystone retaining wall (PR #4 - Item 6) 7,209. Total GMP $ 8,901,238. 3.4.5 The Construction Manager shall be bound only by the total of the Guaranteed Maximum Price and not by the estimated costs for each category or line item of work comprising the GMP. 3.4.6 The GMP is based on the scope of the work as defined in the July 10, 1990 GMP document, hereby incorporated by reference, and the drawings and specifications issued by Horty Elving &: Associates for the Alternates and Proposal Requests referenced above. 0 Page 1 of 2 9-I� AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (OWNER) AND M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY (CONSTRUCTION MANAGER) DATED JULY 19. 1990 (continued) 3.4.7 In the event that the Owner authorizes changes to the scope of the work, the GMP will be adjusted accordingly by the cost of those changes. Owner: City of Hutchinson dba Hutchinson Community Hospital Construction Manager: M.A. M ,)rtenson Company Zhbo (signature) (date) (signature) (date) by Paul Ackland by Thomas R. McCune Mayor Regional Vice President C:1wp51!gmpamend 0 Page 2 of 2 hutchinson community hospital — a LiteSpan' member 1095 Hignway 15 Sou'n, Hutcmnson, Minnesota 55350 • Te!eohone 612587 2'48 January 17, 1991 The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and Members of the City Council City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members: At a joint meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, the Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors and the Burns Manor Nursing Home Board of Directors considered the following request, which requires your approval: . Proposed Burns Manor /HCH Merger The Burns Manor Nursing Home Board of Directors, the Hutchinson Community ;lospital Board of Directors and the City Council heard presentations by consultant Pat McCulloi of Health Planning and Management Resources, and Duane Nelson, accountant from the firm of Charles Bailly and Company, regarding the proposed merger between Burns Manor Nursing Home and Hutchinson Community Hospital. The reports indicated additional revenue could be realized from UNC allocation and operational chances of approximately $612,000. Allowing for adjustments in the area of salaries and benefits, unemployment workers compensation rate, and other areas, a conservative net change in cash flow is projected at approximately $330,000. A tentative merger date of July 1, 1991 was considered in the preparation of these reports. Following discussion: Motion was made by Johnson, seconded by Myers, to recommend to the City Council approval to proceed to merge Burns Manor as a division of Hutchinson Community Hospital, provided all contingencies are met. Following further discussion: Motion was made by Kay Peterson, seconded by Myers, to amend motion to recommend to the City Council approval to continue with merger process, provided all contingencies are satisfied. All were in favor. Motion to approve amendment carried. . Following adoption of the amendment, the original motion, as amended, was presented for a vote. All were in favor. Motion carried. Honorable Mayor and City Council Members January 17, 1991 Page Two Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely yours, James F. Mills, Chairperson Burns Manor /Hutchinson Community Hospital Task Force La Mae J. Maiers Recording Secretary JFM:Im 0 (612) 587 -5151 f/VTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 January 17, 1991 MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PERMANENT ELIMINATION OF A REA 4 FROM TAX INCREMENT Over the years the City had captured the dollars necessary for the City's Share of the parking program from Tax Increment Area 4. After the dollars were captured for the program the City Council would annually delete Tax Increment Area 4 ( the area occupied by K Mart and Developers Diversified) by resolution. Area 4 deletion was also part of a settlement with former Mayor Jim DeMeyer. In talking with Jerry Gilligan of Dorsey & Whitney, a resolution • can now be adopted to eliminate this annual need. The attached resolution was prepared by Jerry and will permanently eliminate Area 4. RESOLUTION NO. 9415 0 RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 ELIMINATING TAX INCREMENT AREA FOUR FROM THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA (THE CITY) AS FOLLOWS: I. RECITALS. The City has created Development District No. 4 (the "Development District ") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134. The City has adopted a tax increment financing plan with respect to the District (the "Plan "), which Plan establishes a tax increment financing district (the "Tax Increment Financing District ") under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179. Included in the Tax Increment Financing District is Tax Increment Area Four ( "Area Four ") . The following tax parcels are included in area Four: County Tax Identification number: 012 -0500, 012 -0600, 400 -0010, 400 -0020, 400- 0020, 400 -0030, 400 -0040, 400 -0050, 400 -0060, 400 -0080, 400 -0070. 2. ELIMINATION OF AREA FOUR FROM TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT This Council hereby determines that only a portion of the captured • net tax capacity (defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 4) of the Tax Increment Financing District is necessary to finance or otherwise make permissible expenditures under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 4, with respect to the District. The City hereby determines that parcels in Area Four shall be eliminated from the Tax Increment Financing District. The current net tax capacity of the parcels being eliminated exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the Tax Increment Financing Dis- trict's original net tax capacity. The City Administrator is here- by authorized and directed to notify the McLeod County Auditor of the elimination of the parcels from the Tax Increment Financing District. The Mayor, City Administrator, and other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary and execute and deliver all necessary instruments on behalf of the City to accomplish the foregoing. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. ATTEST: Paul L. Ackland Mayor Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 9 -F 0 C TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Hutchinson Solid Waster Advisory Committee DATE: January 17, 1991 RE: 1991 Hutchinson Recycling Contract McLeod County has now approved a revised 1991 recycling budget for Hutchinson. The budget includes monitoring of the compost site, monies for education, monies for incentive programs and curbside recycling city wide. The budget • does not include dropboxes which the county has included in their budget. Approving the 1991 recycling contract would require the city to initiate a curbside pickup city wide, progress with an educational program to residents and improve citizen participation by providing incentive programs. It would also require the city to continue with its existing compost site and its monitoring and regularly scheduled hours. The committee recommends that the city approve the contract for 1991. • Cihj Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9 -G, 1991 RECYCLING BUDGET Two Dropboxes - Civic Arena and Super America Station Curbside Pickup - Precincts #1 & #4 - Janaury Curbside Pickup - Precincts #1, #2, #3, #4 & #5 February through December Compost Site - April 15 to November 15 Dr2Rboxes - (rate $70 per pull) two boxes 24 pulls /month X 12' Curbside - (rate $1.40 /household and $1.00 /apartment unit /month) 1,183 households X $1.40 /month = $1,656.20 (January) _ 140 apartment units X $1.05 /month = $140 (January) _ 3,500 households X $1.40 /month = 4,000 X 11 (Feb. -Dec.) 1,410 apartments X $1.00 /month = $1,410 X 11 (Feb. -Dec.) C ompost Site Personnel $20,160.00 /year $ 1,656.20 $ 140.00 $53,900.00 $15,510.00 $71,202.00 954 monitor hours (April 15 to November 15) X $4.20 /hour = $4,006.80 /year Education Incentives $ 5,000.00 $ 1,800.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 82,008.80 0 • • ? -G. COUNTY OF MCLEOD SOLID WASTE FUNDING AGREEMENT 0 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the County of McLeod, acting by and through the Solid Waste Office, hereinafter referred to as the County and the city of , hereinafter referred to as the City. S; ITNESSF.TH: WHEREAS, the County has been granted certain responsibility for regulation of solid waste development, as provided by SCORE; and WHEREAS, the County is authorized by the Waste Management Act and SCORE Legislation to provide funding for local governments for solid waste management, consistent with the SCORE rules; and WHEREAS, the County has received SCORE funding for assistance. NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto: 1. WORK Local Government Responsibility (1) Documentation of Actual Costs. The City agrees to provide to the County documentation of all actual eligible costs, defined by the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, and consistent with SCORE. An example of an allowable cost is the ;nailing costs associated with public education. (2) The City shall return to the County any funds ad auced which are not used in the calendar :ear or are not used for the intended purpose (i.e., the budget approved by the County Board). (3) If the City does not complete all the tasks by DecemLer 31, 1991, then all remaining funds for the purposes of solid waste management shall be returned to the County. 2. FUNDING The County shall pay- to the City all solid waste abatement expenses for 1991 as approved by the County Board and according to the attached budget. The City agrees to pay all expenses not paid for by the agreement. All billings shall first be sent to the • 9- G 0 McLeod County Solid Waste Officer, 803 11th Street East, Glencoe, Minnesota 55336 for approval and processing. Advance payment to the City from the County shall not exceed 25 percent of the adopted budget upon completion of this agreement for the first quarter. In April and July, the County shall reimburse the City for the actual expenditure incurred in the first and second quarters respectfully. The final expenditure report, which will include both third and fourth quarters, must be submitted within 30 days following the end of the fourth quarter. Final payment will be made after the Work has been completed, provided that all costs and Work for which quarterly- expenditure reports are submitted, are determined by the Solid Waste Officer to be in accordance with the terms of this budget. 3. SPECIAL PROVISIONS a. The City agrees that in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract, or sub - contract hereunder, neither it nor any contractor, material supplier, or vendor shall engage in any discriminatory employment practices as such practices are defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 181.59 and Chapter 363, or in any practices prohibited by Minnesota Statutes Section 177.42 and 177.43 (1988). b. The City shall indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the County, its agents, and employees from all claims or actions which may arise from performance of this Agreement. C. The books, records, documents and accounting procedures, and practices of the City relevant to this Agreement shall be subject to examination by the Solid Waste .advisory Committee /County- Board and the McLeod County ,auditor. 4. TERM - The fiscal year is the calendar year. This Agreement shall become effective when all signatures required have been obtained and when the funds have been encumbered by the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, and shall continue in effect • until the provisions of the contract are completed. 5. TERMINATION This agreement is contingent upon the availability of SCORE funds, McLeod County tip fees, and McLeod County Solid Waste Abatement fees to fund the attached budget. This agreement shall terminate at the option of the McLeod County- Board of Commissioners, if such funds are unavailable to continue financing the City's solid waste abatement programs contained in the attached budget. In addition to the above provision, the County may terminate this Agreement "with cause ". "With cause" shall mean that the City is not performing the Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or the Work is not being performed to the satisfaction of the County. If this Agreement is so terminated, the County shall only be liable to pay for the Work found acceptable and all other funds will be returned to the County within 30 days following termination. In the event of termination of this Agreement as heretofore provided, the City shall have ten (10) days prior written notice of the termination date and if the Agreement is being terminated "with cause" the City shall have until the date of termination to show cause why the Agreement should not be terminated. If it is determined by the County that the City's default was beyond its control or it was not otherwise in default, the Agreement shall not be terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement. NCLEOD COUNTY CITY OF BY: BY: Chair, McLeod County Board Mayor of of Commissioners DATE: DATE: BY: Auditor • DATE: BY: City Administrator DATE: (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON ���HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 H E H 0 R A N D U H DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of "WalMart Subdivision" Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary and final plat. HISTORY On September 28, 1990, WalMart Inc., submitted an application for a preliminary and final plat to be known as "WalMart Subdivision ", located in The South Half, Southeast Quarter, Northeast Quarter, • Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, Excepting the right - of -way for Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 15. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 16, 1990, and reopened on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT The required application and plat maps were submitted the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4, 1990. 3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, submitted certification that the proposed plat meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per Preliminary and Final Plat Data. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned preliminary and final plat be approved subject to staff recommendations of January 2, 1991, and compliance with the • City of Hutchinson zoning ordinance. Respectfully submitted, William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission AVENVE 1. 4 /rte— oil I /I Fes S to 'E "Acc (ME CEDAR 4 v U-cs FALEUO%T AVENUE .......... . . ......... ... huE AVENVE 1. 4 CENTORY AVENUE rV •ADEN :I 0 S.,1141 LIE%' E I AREA TO BE PLATTED NAL—MART SUBDIVISION" rou*KV •t /rte— —' /I Fes S to 'E "Acc (ME CEDAR 0 v U-cs FALEUO%T AVENUE CENTORY AVENUE rV •ADEN :I 0 S.,1141 LIE%' E I AREA TO BE PLATTED NAL—MART SUBDIVISION" rou*KV •t RESOLUTION NO. 9410 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, WalMart Inc., owner and subdivider of the property proposed to be platted as WALMART SUBDIVISION has submitted an application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in McLeod county, to -wit; The South Half, Southeast Quarter, Northeast Quarter, Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, Excepting the right -of -way for Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 15. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That said preliminary and final plat of WALMART SUBDIVISION is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit required, shall be conclusive showing of therewith by the subdivider and City officials above described and shall entitle such plat to forthwith without further formality. execution of the y Administrator, as proper compliance charged with duties be placed on record Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. J ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor 9 -y (612) 587.5151 f1U1lH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON • 37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 H E H O R A N D U H DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR REZONING AS SUBHITTED BY WALMART INC. Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HISTORY • On September 28, 1990, WalMart Stores, Inc, submitted an application request to rezone property located on Hwy 15 South from R -2 (Multiple Family Residence) to C -4 (Fringe Commercial District) for the purpose of commercial retail. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 16, 1990, the hearing was tabled and reopened on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, at which time there was no objection to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4, 1990. 3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the request was appropriate for the area. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request to rezone be granted subject to construction • beginning within 6 months. Respectfully submitted, William Craig, Chairman 7 —=, Hutchinson Plannina Commission CENTURY i ATLANTA AVENUE [il!5T • Z . C . _ ' ^' •CDITIDN 'z i • f t _ 3 I e BALTIMORE AVENUE AREA TO BE REZONED R -2 to C -4 AREA Y DCATONAL TECHNICAL NS•; TYTE • J a- C f - 7-, N 1 { 11 1 1 • I N E S E I 2 FMS, " # r ai E i • Ste 1 • a f ' 1a C[WR NUE \� CHEYr S IIl 16 i y = T 1 4 ACRES •� ` s .. - i FREFYpNT AVENUE ....JAI• r •f 4 AV I WLL — CENTURY i ATLANTA AVENUE [il!5T • Z . C . _ ' ^' •CDITIDN 'z i • f t _ 3 I e BALTIMORE AVENUE AREA TO BE REZONED R -2 to C -4 AREA Y DCATONAL TECHNICAL NS•; TYTE • J a- C f - 7-, WT. ti 8-3' 25' W C WA .M 1.07 ACHES b m WAL-14ART F.F.-1064.70 r. / �:TURE S 83' 34' 18" W z M WrI . t N 83 75' 3VE i N 1 477 A ll , FUTURE N -i� PA.11"I'l d XJ 41 t, D O; D 1296.74' (612) 587 -5151 f/UTCN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON • 37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATES January 16, 1991 TOs Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ROBERT HANTGE TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On December 26, 1990, Robert Hantge submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to construct a twin home • located in Stoney Point Addition on School Road. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as set forth above construction is to begin in 6 months. Respectfully submitted, William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission _j— RESOLUTION NO.9411 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME LOCATED ON SCHOOL RD BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Robert Hantge, has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to construct a twin home on property located in Stoney Point Addition on School Rd, with the following legal description: Lot 11, Block 1, Stoney Point Addition 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of • the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor 0 9 -s 0 0 • Lot 11, Block 1, Stoney Point Addition SCALE { _ T, Partial Copy Plat - Stoney Point Addition / %% . Z ` °,����c 9 a , Showin Lot it, 1310ok 19 5 • (} COO 3) Z3 's ° 9i I . \ ' ,'. \ 17 ,4th j CP o •R �a1 \ \ fit �,J' • a� \ \q• �C' , � o /969 'J In Wo fer :cOrdii�cJ Ito '�� " r r• Go�� \ i... v P /f one•/ dis,l� �ofeet East `he �nfe�sacfio� O 5 \ ,A 6 NNI aa N� l N -\0 t �d•2'a'o7" ' / .. f ��- , oa.0 Ok 3dT� s� ti \tiq R9 21 f4M 35p :n r 22 ,a. a je�o _ 90 F i &I 3. 2!' �•/036Y t 10 Am b B 6 bj // Nd 14 `�. / / / 4 .: 2 68 80.0 3 431 �Y .,e ho ...46 r C:79.65 •.+ \\ so : \\ X5 0 \ 1h .y 0 .e Ir1 kG? ' fx 1I a �N + M 3S i5 O ` /� N V � f r p �• N w f �I v 35 35 �N + M 3S i5 O ` /� N V (612) 587 -5151 yvrcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON OL 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATEi January 16, 1991 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECTS CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY ANDERSON FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY AT HWY 15 S Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On December 28, 1990, Randy Anderson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to change use from funeral home to child care center located at 897 Hwy 15 S. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, `J William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 9 -K RESOLUTION NO 9412 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO OPERATE A CHILD CARE FACILITY LOCATED ON HWY 15 S BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Randy Anderson, has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to change use from funeral home to child care center located at 897 Hwy 15 S, with the following legal description: Lot 18 except that part North of THE 15 and E 23.5' of South 175' of Lot 8 Auditors Plat South 1/2 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffUc conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor 1] • • 9 -K (612) 587.5151 0 I T Y OF HUTCHINSON VASHING TON AVENUE WEST - HINSON, MINN. 55350 H E M 0 R A N D U H DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY STACEY BARCLAY,AUTO SALES STORE HWY 7 E Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On December 28, 1990, Randy Anderson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow for the parking of up to 5 used • autos and a used auto sales store located at 1130 E Hwy 7. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as set forth above subject to hardsurfacing the parking area and providing a parking layout to city staff. • Respectfully submitted, William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission �_k. n I'll, - .� . . . . . . . . . . . . . Nw cor. of SI/2 of SE t/4 Certimcqte- Survey for Richard Larson ---520.00 S89•2 assumed bearing Confer One of State Hr9hWOy No. 7 VVIest low of SE V4 of Sec. 32, T 117 K, R.29 W. SiXTHERL7 PA:<.I:L . hit part Of the Scuth lial: c: the z;o•.-!.Ea5t '.-:.artcr nz sectic,. 32. 1 NOrth. R aii 2t- West of the Sth Principal xrrvttal. drscri,xl as follows: U^:IkIXLf,a at the northwest car- ncr of said Soutt, Ila.-I th .c. s_ P/ the W It I Ilw -).' sI!,I S.-,th lk.lt is or 209 fort " the center !Inc of '.zatc ifi,:h•x-. M,, 7: thc:.z• Oc,th F! dc.:riies 24 nin,tes asstned beatt::-!, - - 1 0!:4 fall" c-.nt a 520.00 '-vt: tr- so,;t-t,rty, with sates 272..)R - t•- L:,. :'L!:.t 0: -.'11:.V.I.A Cl LIX 11..a t4' 4;%Cr%bca; tl•,ce Ac:t. BY 24 os', I ell4t , . 100.00 zeet.; trl.!.,rj si tn'r' parallel wiLr. M"L of 1.2�:. -. t,- t; the!.r,. '.octh 89 24 We". a 100.00 fcet; ^nrn4r ;'.I*'h'rV.. rolz'.l.ei .1-- Sll.I .' • 12,.92 feet t- th,: of Als:f a 1 flot -11m- for arIvw;-v pi-rrss-as. TL^ cast line of said Ca%^McIIL -A wL. - :o..: a t ! thc' ' r V. M 7.. I:'CC L' t:;C, . 7r 2QJ " :1 - �- - -ne 1�1' .LL :.int of 1.'y I Ir' 7 f mwr.", Lab 7r. 0:.C1- %C, " ra'd t -' ", - - - '!. I' ti.Ts rv.. w is orr: ...... i ,-. -, . :.:r .., szr it. t .1. 1 ir .E .c : .: 7 I I lat� M.A.. L 7.. HANSEN THORP PELLINIEN OLSON INC. BOOK HTPO 21 PAGE 15 — ---. -- 10000 106 C;o 9 0 0 Right of sor line ON State Itoy No.? O e C 0 1, - 10 00 200 00 AREA OF SOUTMEQLY PARCEL 1 02 679 SO FT TOTAL 1400 PARCEL . 27 280 SO. FT. (IS 760 SO. FT. SOUTH OF RIGHT OF WAY FILE NO. 18 p a so staff in too I II ": * I- 100.00 58e- 24'E fy • RESOLUTION NO. 9413 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW FOR THE PARKING OF UP TO 5 USED AUTOS LOCATED ON AT 1130 E HWY 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MNa FINDINGS 1 • Stacey Barclay , has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow for the parking of up to 5 used autos located at 1130 E Hwy 7, with the following legal description: That part of the South Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 117 North Range 29 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said South Half; thence southerly along the west line of said South Half a . distance of 209 feet to the center line of State Highway No. 7; thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes East, assumed bearing, along said center line, a distance of 520.00 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing South 89 degrees 24 minutes East a distance of 100.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with said North 89 degrees 24 minutes West a distance of 100.00 feet; thence northerly, parallel with said west line, a distance of 273.08 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to right of way of State Highway No. 7 And subject to an easement for driveway purposes over that part of the easterly 30 feet thereof lying south of the southerly right of way line of State Highway No. 7 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the • health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 9 -L. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above with the stipulation the parking be hardsurfaced and a parking layout is to be presented to staff. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor E is • (612) 587 -5151 ya�cH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON . 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M T0: Hutchinson City Council DATE, January 16, 1991 FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY ARTHUR BENJAMIN Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On December 28,1990, Bob Elliott, H application for a variance by the owner and reduce loading space located at 100 • public hearing was held at the regular Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT utchinson, submitted an to reduce parking spaces Washington Ave East. A meeting of the Planning at which time was no one 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be approved as set forth above contingent on a lease provided to the city for a variance reduction of 10 spaces to bring to 16 spaces. Respectfully submitted, • William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission q -M. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for TOWN 6 COUNTRY TIRE 4— -- - I r N W f.L V I z Q I WASHINGTON ery�Le ah Iseewf, CHAR N L .c'� I • 1 nL 82.00 o a�, St9 I N � t�AOILOf ED A091T10V s � w c > Ex15:'•,c 611LOON �' M/MHLMRe i O O s e� N Vt LOl epee 11{EL u n 1; t r P c � p r i y I Y ` •1 '. I 8 2.00 M ~ N y 1 r ^ w w - a EMI! m !Ff den01l1 iron. monument found p denotes, Iron manamenl set N2 rn<A Mam wnn ptae PEILINCM LANG EYFVE ,tnf - -- -- AVENUE = I ^ ✓ N — 7 - IB• s n L n r uer. a.. I PAevLef __ AREAL 9189 SQUARE FEET t — I I I I I I W J i j Q THE WEST 82.00 FEET OF LOT IO AND THE WEST 82.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 46.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK 7, SOUTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON. I .he reby Ee•tde tnit INH sur Ve, was orePared aL Ale W uncle• my d,re!t %UPer /as'au 1"d Prq' 1 qm a duty 1 gensed lan9 '.ur,lrOr •,P.Igf he laws of la! State . ofNlgN talc W/tford Pplrnln, lreense No. _ 9626 DeLernt" IS I!4N1 0 .. "( Vi - e.,f e, Ive Nf/ yn Jae 9 -Me f RESOLUTION NO. 9414 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF • ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO REDUCE PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 100 WASHINGTON AVE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS 1. Bob Elliott, Hutchinson, has applied for a variance from Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce number of parking spaces located at 100 Washington Ave, with the following legal description: The West 82.00 feet of Lot 10 and the West 82.00 feet of the North 46.00 feet of Lot 9, Block 7, South half of Hutchinson 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the application be approved. 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. CONCLUSION The application for variance for the purpose designated is granted based upon the findings set forth above contingent on a lease provided to the city for a variance reduction of 10 spaces to bring to 16 spaces. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991. Gary D. Plotz, City Admin. Paul L. Ackland, Mayor —/41. (612) 587.5151 f/UTIH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK (2 MILE RADIUS) HASSAN VALLEY The Planning Commission recommends approval contingent on a 25' wide maintenance easement along the river. • � J 9 -d✓ HQUKO S S a PNmo9e and uldily easements a morn tnrs a daMla< fmn melmmVn 1011A0 I o donates V2 Inch by 14 fnrh Iron 0.00 set. 4 marked by LKansa No. 9626. The east bee Of tote NE 114 of Sec 7 n a _. assumed to pare a hedr 01 9 t• 32'27• w - - Widths of easements ore snow. On the map f 1 8,11h mork SO-00 -4 W-th lace 01 poye• We 1104712 Mar S' ^Lorne" of Lot I ElOW -0- µal< " 'I" or CIO. R." at n0"m one OI Lot 1 _ r T ' J..c�k • If!'l � an Nar 12, 1990 r 1022 1 {N G W 19jar , * c 14 • a' r' pads y Lost .1.1 moo „m <nr NE corner of ri•. PC .. .” it r` ,l� • 'Y • os of 4 tae . 4^ 1 W84-08' 16 23 ' 4t7 - 6 ae a O � fle. N• `I , s �y • R .. •.• ,.. \ D E w r4 lone of Sec 71 f- _. .. — - __.___ .. — _'___._ . ;\�- �: \ `_..__ ;ice:•••• \ • 1 ,' N 6y '1 9 ' ah - \ \ s69.492rE 3 �i• E p m v . ;2 �E — — ` Off'• N ��m. m4p -- - AaO — — -- — — — — —' — . j .• f SC' - S2 ail Si \ 's rn N South hme of Lot 9'' N 89. 03'43'W •'• ct 4ud tool of Set 7 ' SE m "•w of Sec 7 .. A cast .,on monument 6 4.1 1 L. IInpM . +ro t Pamela n wife, [e'- " -ni; and that r:. Lr•uk, h if1: 0 If.l>t IIUL..11 nb rte 11I111Y5 ntnr O 0 4 w in Carl✓ I'atln, In•Ir '.A: CC, nl ll• •U4 t m a 4:alf r -l:fl( .uld r t the [,poly Of NC LCOd, State Ni nd,:NOto, to rot: ♦'�rrlh•II PNi' " -t't,f situated PIA'r uF st'C"Itw J. '[nVNSN1Y lit NORTH. NANGF. 29 Vest, described 4a It Ir:n'c Lnl> i And `1 di t he A�. 110.i'9 north line of l with the crtnlev line J at sAld Atdi tor'4 Plat with f•.l tars: .. ":umm�ei o; at the. ir.:crAe..tlan et the d to ..• I.'Mr Iit�hrav %p. 25 ([oc:carl,Y escr tauE;iuhbecJescrihhed; thence northeasterlyt flectib the th t' ' ''' "' t7. •. t,• a point on a line, sat" line being the south• *riv •• 2 0 212 a `"/ ;'3 BA33A11 VALi.EY T � Hebert B Anderaoq, Deputy Cle ;k. Edwin E Haman McLeod County Zoning Adminiatrater 830 11 St E Olenceo Minnesota 55336 -2270 Jan 21 1991 Subjecti Houkto Subdivision final plat, section 7 Hassan Valley trp. The Hassan Valley Tom Board of Supervisors voted to approve the final plat with no recommeridationa, at the regular Town Board me g January 8 1991. �� 10 , Hobert E Anderson Deputy Clark CC City Council, City of Hutchinson 0 9 -A! (612) 587.5151 f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 H E H 0 R A N D U H DATE, January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY KEVIN COMPTON (2 MILE RADIUS) The Planning Commission recommends approval with no objection. �J P ' ( 612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E H 0 R A N D U M DATE: January 4, 1991 T0: Hutchinson Planning Commission Hutchinson Planning Staff FROM: Jim Marka, Building Official SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN 2 MILE RADIUS Mr. Kevin Compton contacted me today requesting to be placed on the January Planning Commission agenda for a conditional use permit to operate a retail gun shop within on Industrial Zoned district within Hutchinson's 2 mile radius. In my conversation with Mr. Ed Homan, McLeod County Zoning Administrator, I learned that this land use is existing, but procedure was not originally properly followed. McLeod County is • requesting a recommendation from the City of Hutchinson, so I placed this matter on the Planning Commission agenda for your consideration. JM /bb • v' / (612)587-5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E H 0 R A N D U M DATE, January 16, 1991 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Planning Commission recommends approval. • 0 9-F FOR YOUR INFORMATION • 14ITlUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 15, 1991 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, Craig Lenz, E1Roy Dobratz, Tom Lyke and Chairman Bill Craig. Members absent: Dean Wood. Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka and City Engineer John Rodeberg. 2. 11111UTES Mr. Lenz made a motion to meeting dated Tuesday, December the motion carried unanimously. approve the minutes of the regular 18, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FRO14 R -2 TO C -4 REQUESTED ON THE WALMART PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT • Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the reading of publication #4171 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4, 1990. The request is for the purpose of rezoning property from R -2 (Residential district) to C -4 (Commercial district) located in the WalMart Subdivision. Building Official Marka explained the proposal and the resolution of the subdivision agreement to city staff satisfaction. Tim Loose, Bolton -Menk, commented on the past proposal and also the annexation. He commented on the timeline of the WalMart plan and reviewed the present site plan. He explained the plac_ment of sanitary sewer, parking criteria, future expansion possibilities, detention pond and drainage. He commented on the truck access and unloading. Discussion followed on the traffic release to Hwy 15 and the possibility of exit to a side street in the future. There is also discussion on parking possibilities and the detention pond. • Hr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Gruett the hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Lenz moved to recommend approval Df the rezoning from R -2 to C -4 provided construction is begun within 6 months. MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 1/15/91 Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. • (b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7,46 p.m. with the reading of publication #4172 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday October 4, 1990. The request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary and final plat to be known as "Waltiart Subdivision" located at Hwy 15 S. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, Dobratz the hearing closed at 7:47 p.m. a motion to recommend approval providing City ordinances and staff recommendatio 1991. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the unanimously. seconded by Mr. Hr. Ebent made it complies with ns of January 2, motion carried (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ROBERT HANTGE TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:48 p.m. with reading of publication #4191 as published in Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991. the the The • request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to allow the owner to construct a twin home located in Stoney Point Addition on School Road. Mr. Robert Hantge, owner of the property presented the proposal and commented on the building itself and its Position on the property. He presented a sketch of the plan. Building Official Marka commented on the transition of the area from PUD to R -1. Discussion followed on water and sewer service off of School Rd. and the transition of the property. , Mr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval provided the construction begins within 6 months. Seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PER14IT REQUESTED BY RANDY ANDERSON FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY AT HWY 15 S. Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:57 p.m. with the reading of publication #4193 as published the HUTCHINSON LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for • the purpose of conside2 =ing a conditional use permit to allow the perspective owner to change use from funeral MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 1/15/91 • home to child care center located at 897 Hwy 15 S. Mr. Randy Anderson, perspective owner, was present to answer questions on the proposal. He stated the South and East side of the building would be fenced for play area. fir. Marka commented on his inspection with Fire Marshal George Field. The parking seems to be adequate and handicapped accessible. There was discussion on the spiral staircase and the elevator, both are not to code. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:06 p.m. Hr. Lenz made a motion to approve the request with city staff recom;nendations. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY STACEY BARCLAY, AUTO SALES STORE ON HWY 7 E Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:07 p.m. with the • reading of publication #4195 published in the HUTCHINSON LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for considering a conditional use permit to allow for the parking of up to 5 used autos and a used auto sales store located at 1130 E Hwy 7. Building Official Marka explained the proposal with the parking of used cars at the Barclay site and office at the NAPA store. Mr. Bob Powell, owner of NAPA store, commented on the proposal. Discussion followed on the zoning of the Property and the proposal of the conditional use permit. Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval provided the lot be hardsurfaced and a parking layout be presented. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY BOB ELLIOTT Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:17 p.m. with the reading of publication #4196 published in the HUTCHINSON LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for . considering a variance by the owner to reduce parking spaces and reduce loading space located at 100 Washington Ave East. MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 1/15/91 Building Official Marka commented on staff recommendation • and that the major concern of staff would be parking. Discussion followed on the C -3 district parking fund contributions. 14r. Bob Elliott, Town and Country Tire, explained his business and ho�i the parking would be alleviated. Chairman Craig expressed his concern with such a large reduction of parking spaces. Discussion followed on the possibility of a lease from neighboring property owners for additional 10 parking spaces. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Gruett the hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. fir. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the variance contingent upon a reduction of the variance to 10 spaces from 21 spaces and providing a lease in writing to the city for the spaces fir. Elliott will obtain. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSIaESS (a) DISCUSSION OF SKETCH PLAN OF HELLANDS 1ST ADDITION • REQUESTED BY DON ERICKSON Mr. Don Erickson commented on the proposal to plat in Helland's 1st Addition. Discussion followed on the PD zoning of the property. Mr. Marka commented on the history of the property and the procedure is to plat with a subdivision agreement then to process a conditional use permit. There was discussion on the driveway exits onto the cul de sac. City Engineer Rodeberg commented on snow removal in the cul -de -sac. It is the consensus of the planning commission to proceed with the platting procedure. (b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN IN HASSAN VALLEY REQUESTED BY MARTIN RETT14AN (2 MILE RADIUS) Withdrawn. (c) DISCUSSION OF TEMPORARY CLASSR0014 SITE REQUESTED BY SUPERINTENDENT GLEN MATEJKA 4 0 0 11INUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 1/15/91 Superintendent Hatejk.a commented on the need for additional space outside of the school building site and his options of leasing space in the city. At this tine there are no buildings available, therefore, Mr. Matejka is proposing a portable classroom space on school property. He commented on the facility and the possibility of a permanent building. There was discussion of the length of using a temporary of portable building. The planning commission voiced concern with a 5 year possibility but is comfortable with a 2 or 3 year situation. It is the consensus of the planning commission for the school district to look at the option of a permanent building. (d) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERVIT PROPOSAL BY BRIAN PIENDLANDT Mr. Brian Wendlandt commented on his proposal which would not take effect for approximately 2 years. Discussion followed on the type of building and the use. It is the consensus of the planning commission that the request would be appropriate for the area. (e) DISCUSSION OF REZONING REQUESTED BY TOM DAGGETT, HUTCH MANUFACTURING Hr. Tom Daggett explained the layout of property and proposal of zoning to IC -1. He commented there are no Plans for the property at this time. It is the consensus of the planning commission that the request is appropriate for the area. ( f ) CONSIDERATION OF FI14AL PLAT SUB1 {ITTED BY GALEN HOUK III HASSAN VALLEY (2 MILE RADIUS) Mr. Lenz made a motion to approve the plat contingent on a 25' wide maintenance easement along the river. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. (9) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY KEVIN COMPTON ON F; 15 11 (2 MILE RADIUS) Mr. Kevin Compton commented on the County ordinance regarding Industrial Zoned District and appropriate usage. Mr. Gruett moved to recommend approval with no objection, seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. r 14INUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 1/15/91 5. OLD BUSINESS 0 (a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Building Official Marka commented that staff recommends the plan be accepted an presented. Mr. Lyke moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (b) DISCUSSION REGARDING LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY Mr. Marka commented on the agreement being negotiated. (c) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE The Planning Commission will hold three special meetings to review the zoning ordinance as drafted. (d) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Building Official Marka commented on the Shoreland Ordinance and bids received. City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on the MN DOT Task • Force. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. 6 0 DAVID D.AAVOLD OARY D. MCDOWELL STEVEN A. A.4DERSON G. BARRY ANDERSON• STE%FN S. 1106E LAI'RA X. FRETLAND DAVID A. Ii1t1- EOOEMAN - PAUL D. DOVE JOSF1`I1 M. PAIEMENT JAMES LTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIAN'S RICHARD G. M,GEE TI40] "HY W. PAPINSKI 0 E AIRNOLD & MCDOIVELL ATTORNEYS AT L.Aw 101 PARK PLACE HUTCIn \SON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 5137 -7575 FAX (612) 567-4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON January 4, 1991 Mr. Jim Mills 962 Rolling Greens Lane Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Mr. Ken Merrill Director of Finance 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Dry Dock Lease Our File No. 3188 -89 -0114 Dear Jim, Ken and Gary: OF COCYSEL CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" WILLIAM W.CA -4EROV 5001 CEDAR "RE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545-9000 MX TOLL FREE 000 - 343 -4545 FAX ( 612) 545 -1799 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETOX, MINNESOTA 55371 (612)309-2214 FAX (612) 309-5506 I am enclosing for the review of each of you a copy of the proposed lease agreement between Mr. Dolder and the City of Hutchinson. I direct your attention, from a financial standpoint, to pages 2 through 4. It is my understanding that these provisions are the same as in the prior lease, but in view of the fact that the Dry Dock facility has occupied the premises now for at least a period of one year, care should be taken to make sure that our actual practice corresponds with the lease provisions. Assuming that there are no differences, I believe the lease is ready to be approved at, presumably, the last meeting in January. Do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions. Thank you. Best personal regards. Very truly s ARNOLD & WE G. Barry e son GBA:lm Enclosure 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINN£SO'TA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION n "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION / III INSURANCE Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 January 8, 1991 Mr. Barry Anderson Arnold and McDowell 101 Park Place Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Dry Dock Lease Insurance Limits F srry: You are correct (as usual), since the City did not renew its $1,000,000 umbrella liability policy we only have a combined single limit of $600,000 under the League of Minnesota Cities contract. I would also agree with you that the $600,000 should be adequate. I am enclosing a copy of the limits page as well as a certificate of insurance which pertains to these limits for your convenience. We currently are insuring the City's interest in personal property at the Dry Dock location in the amount of $75,000. We also have a $250,000 fire legal liability limit at the Dry Dock location. If you need anything more, Barry, let me know. E Sere j Dennis W. o DWP /slb Enclosures: IlI 1, u 0 • Telephone: 612 -587 -2299 /� Fax: 612- 587-0808 ` ` , (7) A "city' relief association, its mem. (2) While acting on behalf of the 'joint powers bers, officers, and employees. entity: (8) Any person while acting in the admin- (a) a governmental member of the joint istrative capacity of medical director powers cntity or medical advisor to the 'city am- bulance service. (b) an elected or appointed official of the governmental member C. With respect to a "joint powers entity" named in the Declarations: (c) an employee of the governmental member (1) The 'joint powers entity: (d) any other authorized person or agent of the governmental member, but ex- eluding independent contractors SECTION III - LIMITS OF COVERAGE 1. The limits of coverage shown in the Declarations period of less than twelve (12) months, in that and the rules below fix the most "we' will pay un- case, the additional period will be deemed part der each coverage part regardless of the number of the last preceding period for purposes of de- of: (ermining the limits of coverage. a. 'Covered Parties'; 4. The Fire Damage Limit is the most "we" will pay under Coverage A for damages because of prop - b. Claims made or suits brought; or erty damage to premises rented to (he 'city" arising out of any one fire. C. Persons or organizations making claims or bringing suits. 5. The Medical Expense Limit is the most 'we' will pay under Coverage B for all medical expenses 2. LMCIT's maximum limit of liability for Coverage because of bodily injury sustained by any one per - Parts A, C, D, and L combined shall be $600,000 son, and the occurrence aggregate limit is the per occurrence or sudden ocnurence whether a most "we' will pay under Coverage B for all med- • claim arises out of one coverage part or a com- ical expenses because of bodily injury to two or bination of more than one coverage part, more persons resulting from one occurrence. 3. The Products- Completed Operations Annual Ag- 6. The Limited Pollution Liability Limit is the most gregate Limit is the most "we" will pay under 'we" will pay for damages not excluded under Coverage A for damages because of injury and Coverages A, C, D, and E arising out of the ac- damage included in the products - completed oper- tual, alleged, or threatened discharge of pollut- ations hazard. ants as the result of a sudden occurrence and the annual aggregate limit is the most "we" will pay The limits of this Coverage Part apply separately as damages resulting from one or more sudden to each consecutive annual period and to any occurrences during the annual coverage period. remaining period of less than twelve (12) months, starting with the beginning of the coverage period 7. LMCIT shall not be obligated to pay any claim shown in the Declarations, unless the coverage or judgment or to defend any suit after the ap- period is extended after issuance for an additional plicable limit of LMCIT's liability under Coverages A, C, D or E has been exhausted by payment of judgment or settlements. SECTION IV - DEFINITIONS I. Automobile (Auto) means a land motor vehicle, trailer a. The United Slates of America (including its Icr- or semi - trailer designed for travel on public roads, in- ritorics and possessions), Puerto Rico and eluding any attached machinery or equipment. But au- Canada; tonmbile does not include mobile equipment. b. International waters or airspace, provided the in- 2. Bodily Injury means bodily injury, sickness or disease jury or damage does not occur in the course of sustained by a person, including death resulting from travel or transportation to or from any place not any of these at any lime. included in a. above; or 3. Coverage territory means: c. All parts of the world if: LICIT CHIC (I1 -86) (Rev. 11 -87) page 8 of 13 '11, , SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED i0 THOMAS B. DOLDER LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NC OB'_IGATICK CR LIAS'LITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE CCN'PA'IY, ITS AGENTS CP PEPPESEN7A "VE5. A_ •[.R.ZE: n[r'P.ESE \'A — 'NE DENNIS W. POTTER S _ -- - - 1/08/91 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATEOOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURANCE PLANNERS COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE 135 — 3RD AVE SE CC OMPA R NY A HUTCHINSON MN 55350 LMCIT COMPANY B r>SUREO LETTER COMPANY C CITY OF HUTCHINSON LETTER COMPANY G 37 WASHINGTON AVE W HUTCHINSON MN 55350 LETTER COMPANY E CCC LETTER a� THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WH!CH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI- TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DA E CTIVE DOTE (M DA EYI) OA7E E `- C (V)A71YYI ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS . .,A GENERAL LIABILITY CMC 11091 7/01/90 7/01/91 GENERAL - E - 600 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRJDJCTS- CJMP%✓'S A,- RELATE X CLMMS MADE ❑Jf --ulkR Eti,i PERS31l A A S5 AYJRY L+V',N R 5 & OW. P;,c-aps Pg0'K7. YE :1-. s,'K 600 RE CAUAGE t o %Y CAE Fa.) 250 VEZI�A EXPE\SE IAYY DIE PEPS41 1 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY -.,;,'Tt•J' +, AN'Y AUTO S ALL DNNED AUTOS SCHEOULO 0.UTp5 :PE; PERS7M � HIRED AUTOS _ NON -OANEO AUTOS GARAGE LIASILi?Y -- • ]NUr EXCESS LIABILITY OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORV WORKERS' COMPENSATION STATJ -ORY AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY (D .SEAS::_ Evo::•ti CTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS; LOCATIONS / VEHICLES. RESTRICTIONS /SPEC':AL ITEMS CERT HOLDER IS LANDLORD OF "DRY DOCK" PREMISES. — SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED i0 THOMAS B. DOLDER LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NC OB'_IGATICK CR LIAS'LITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE CCN'PA'IY, ITS AGENTS CP PEPPESEN7A "VE5. A_ •[.R.ZE: n[r'P.ESE \'A — 'NE DENNIS W. POTTER S DAVID B.AHIVOLD GARY D. MCDOWELL . STEVEN A, ANDERSON O. HARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOOE LAURA H. rRETLAND DAVID A. HRUEp EMANN PAUL D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES LTLEY JULIA A.CHRISTIANS HICHARD O. MCOEE TIMOTHY W. PAP IN SHI January 14, 1991 11 A I3NOLD & MCDOIVELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5881 CEDAR LASE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492 (612) 545 -9000 MN TOLL rREE 600. 949 -4545 PAX (6l2) 645.099 Dan Prochnow r' Bradford,,Prochnow & Newmann 75 Hassan Street South Hutchinson, MIN 55350 Re: Dry Dock Lease Our File No. 3188 -89 -0114 Dear Dan: . OP COUNSEL CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" WILLIAM W. CA.MEHON 501 SOUTH MURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNLSOTA 55911 (612) 389- 2214 FAx (612) ]89-5506 IOI PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55950 (612) 581 -1573 PAX (612) 587 -4096 v � > E ry This letter is in response to your inquiry of last week regarding the status of the dry dock lease. The lease is scheduled to be considered for renewal at the next regularly scheduled city council meeting which will be Tuesday, January 22, 1991. Please note that the lease requires public liability insurance with minimum amounts of $500,000 and $1,000,000, and $50,000 for property damage. As you know, under Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes, the City is exposed only to the total sum of $600,000 in damages and the City's insurance program has been brought in line with the statutory requirement. Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Dennis Potter on this subject. The city council will be approving the lease with the amended limits outlined in Mr. Potter's letter. Please send me a revised copy of the lease with the changes noted in the insurance coverage. 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION i I Dan Prochnow ' January 14, 1991 Page 2 If you should have any questions in connection with the foregoing, you certainly should feel free to contact me. Thank yc Best personal regards. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & McDOWELL /s/ G. BARRY ANGEQN G. Barry Anderson GBA/kt Enclosure cc; Plotz - {w enclosure);_ - • LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE, entered into in Hutchinson, MN, as of this • • day of , 19_, by and between Thomas B. Dolder ( "Landlord "), and the City of Hutchinson, Hutchinson, Minnesota ( "Tenant "). 1. PREMISES: Landlord hereby leases to Tenant the premises (the "Premises ") described as follows: Space within the building located in Block One Rolling Oaks First Addition, lots Four, Five, Six, and the West Forty -five feet of Lot Seven in the City of Hutchinson having an approximate total square footage of 3,000 square feet as measured from the exterior face of ar.y exterior walls into the center line of common walls, as outlined in red on the site plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof for the purposes of more specifically locating the premises from Landlord's property. Landlord reserves the right to place, maintain, repair, and replace utility lights, pipes, tunneling, and the like, in, under, over, upon, or through the premises as maybe reasonably necessary or advisa)le for the servicing of the premises or other portions of the building. 2. TERM: (A) To have and to hold the premises unto Tenant commencing on January 1, 1991, and expiring on December 31, 1991 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 3. RENT: (A) Tenant agrees to pay the Lan other places Landlord may from time to time the premises during the term of this Lease, or set -off, monthly installments commencing the au.t- of $800.00 per month in addition utilities and taxes as set forth herein. 31ord, at his home or designate as rent for without any deduction January 1, 1991 in to Tenants portion of (B) In addition, Tenant agrees to pay to the Landlord the sum of $1,200.00 per month as and for rental of personal property located on the premises more specifically set forth in Exhibit B. 9_A_ I 4. TAXES: • Tenant agrees to pay as and for its portion of real estate taxes the sum of $200.00 per month during the term of this Lease. Payment shall be due on the first (1st) of each month commencing on January 1, 1991. 5. CONSTRUCTION: Tenant shall not undertake any construction, nor shall Tenant install any equipment other than trade fixtures and personal property, without first obtaining Landlords written approval of plans and specifications therefore. Tenant shall not commence any work until Tenant delivers to Landlord a policy or policies of public liability and property damage insurance naming Landlord as an insured, and limits and with companies acceptable to Landlord, in a completion bond covering the Tenants work naming Landlord as a beneficiary and otherwise in a form issued by Surety Company acceptable to the Landlord. 6. COMMON AREAS: Landlord grants to Tenant and Tenant's customers and invitees the right to use, in common with all others to whom Landlord has or may hereafter grants rights to use the same, the Common Areas located within the building and on the land of Landlord. The term "Common Areas" as used in this Lease, shall mean the parking areas, roadways, pedestrian sidewalks, loading • docks, delivery areas, landscaped areas, service court, fire corridors, public restrooms, and all other areas or improvements which may be provided by Landlord for the common use of the Tenants of the building. Landlord hereby reserves the following rights with respect to the Common Areas: (1) To establish reasonable rules and regulations for the use thereof; (2) To use or permit the use by others to whom Landlord may have granted such rights for promotional activities; (3) To change the layout of such Common Areas, including the right to reasonably add to or subtract from the shape and size, whether by the addition of building improvements or otherwise; (4) Landlord shall operate, manage, equip, light, repair and maintain said Common Areas for their intended purposes in such manner as Landlord shall in its sole discretion from time to time determine, and may from time to time change the size, location, elevation, nature and /or use of any Common Areas. G 2 Tenant shall pay to Landlord as a Common Area Charge the following share of all costs and expenses of every kind and nature paid or incurred by Landlord in operating, maintaining, and repairing the Common Areas: (i) Tenant shall pay fifty percent (50 %) of all maintenance, repair, and supply costs and expenses for the public restrooms. (ii) Tenant shall pay twenty -five percent (25 %) of all costs and expenses in maintaining the parkinglot and other Common Areas. Such costs and expenses shall include, but not be limited to, costs of management, cleaning, lighting, reasonable reserves, repairing, maintaining, and replacing all Common Area improvements; snow removal, parkinglot scraping, painting, landscaping, provided security, providing public liability, property damage, fire and extended coverage and such other insurance as Landlord deems appropriate for the Common Areas; personal property taxes, supplies, fire protection and fire hydrant charges, licenses and permanent fees. (iii) Tenants Common Area Charge will be paid in . monthly installments on the first day of each month in an amount to be estimated by Landlord. Within ninety (90) days following the end of the period used by the Landlord in estimating Landlord's cost, Landlord shall furnish to Tenant a statement of the actual amount of Tenant's proportionate share of such Common Area Charges for such period. Within fifteen (15) days thereafter, Tenant, shall pay to Landlord or Landlord shall remit to Tenant, as the case may be, the difference between the estimated amounts paid by Tenant and the actual amount of Tenant's Common Area Charge for such period as shown by such statement. Common Area Charge not to exceed $75.00 per month. 7. UTILITIES: (A) Heat and Electric Charges. Commencing with the date on which Landlord delivers the Premises to Tenant, Tenant shall pay for all heating, electric current and all utilities required for the proper operation of Tenant's business, together with all levied or other charges on such utilities and governmental charges based on utility consumption. (B) Water and Sewer Charges. Commencing also on the date on which Landlord delivers the premises to Tenant, Tenant shall pay all water rents, all charges resulting from any L J 3 • sprinkler system and sewer charges charged against the Premises. If separate charges cannot be made or portioned between Tenant and the adjoining occupant of the front portion of the building, Tenant shall pay one -half (1/2) of said charges. ;aid charges shall be paid within thirty (30) days of demand by Landlord. In no event shall Landlord by liable for the quality, quantity, failure, or interruption of such services to the Premises. Said charges not to exceed $75.00 per month. (C) Commencing also on the date on which Landlord delivers the Premises to Tenant, Tenant shall pay one -half (1/2) of the total charges for sanitation removal for the property on which the Premises is located. Said charges will be paid by Tenant within thirty (30) days of demand by the Landlord. 8. USE OF PREMISES BY TENANT: Tenant shall use the Premises only as and for the purpose of conducting a youth center. 9. TENANT'S COVENANTS WITH RESPECT TO OCCUPANCY: Tenant agrees: (A) To occupy the Premises in a safe and careful manner and in compliance with all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders of any governmental bodies having jurisdiction over the Premises, and without committing or • permitting waste; (B) To neither do nor suffer anything to be done or kept in or about the premises which contravenes Landlord's policies or increases the premiums therefore; (C) To permit no reproduction of sound which is audible outside the Premises nor permit odors to be unreasonably dispelled from the Premises; (D) To place no sign on the exterior of the Premises or on the interior surface of any windows of the Premises without also obtaining Landlord's prior written consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld, and to maintain in good repair and promptly remove and repair any damage caused by any such permitted signs. Tenant agrees to maintain its signs in a good state of repair and to save the Landlord harmless from any loss, cost, or damage as a result of the same and shall repair any da -aage which may have been caused by the erection, existence, maintenance or removal of such signs. (E) To place no merchandise, sign or other thing of any kind in the vestibule or entry of the Premises or on the sidewalks or other Common Areas adjacent thereto or elsewhere on the exterior of the Premises; • 4 (F) To park Tenant's vehicles and to require all employees to park only in such places as may be designated from time to time by Landlord for the use of Tenant and its employees, and specifically not to permit parking by any of them in any service court area; (G) To keep any refuse in proper containers in the interior of the premises until the same is removed and to permit no refuse to accumulate around the exterior of the Premises; (H) To neither load nor unload or permit the loading or unloading of merchandise, equipment or other property from any doors of the premises that open onto the front sidewalk areas, nor from any of the doors except from the rear of the Premises and to use its best efforts to prevent the parking or standing of vehicles and equipment upon the land except when actually engaged in loading or unloading; (I) To conduct no auction, fire or going- out -of- business sale without the prior written consent of Landlord; (J) To permit Landlord free access to the Premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of examining the same or making alterations or repairs to the premises that Landlord may deem necessary for the safety or preservation thereof; (K) To adequately heat and cool the Premises; (L) To permit no lien, notice of intention to file lien or other charges (whether arising out of work of any contractor, mechanic, laborer oz materialman or any mortgage, conditional sale, security agreement or chattel mortgage or otherwise) which might be or become a lien or encumbrance or charge upon the Premises or any part thereof or the income therefrom, and to suffer no other matter or thing whereby the estate, right and interest of the Landlord in the Premises or any part thereof might be impaired; (M) To solicit no business in the Common Areas, nor distribute handbills or other advertising matter to customers, r.or place the same in or on automobiles in the Common Areas; (N) To comply with all reasonable rules and regulations which Landlord may from time to time establish for the use and care of the Premises, the Common Areas, and other facilities and buildings on the land; (0) Handle and dispose of all rubbish, garbage, and waste in accordance with regulations established by Landlord and \J 5 not permit the accumulation (unless in sealed metal containers) or burning of any trash, rubbish, refuse, garbage or waste materials in, on, or about any part of the land; (P) That it shall not subject any fixtures, furnishings or equipment in or on Tenant's Premises which are affixed to the realty of any mortgages, liens, conditional sales agreements, security interests or encumbrances. (4) To permit no damage or destruction of Landlord's premises or personal property, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 10. REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS: (A) Landlord shall provide the following repairs within a reasonabl= time from the date of possession: Repairs by Landlord. Landlord shall keep the foundations, roof, and structural portions of the outer walls of the Premises in good repair,'except for repairs required thereto by reason of the acts of Tenant, Tenant's employees, agents, invitees, licensees, or contractors. Tenant shall give Landlord written notice of the necessity for repairs coming to the attention of Tenant following which Landlord shall have a reasonable time to undertake and complete such repairs. The provisions of this section shall not apply in the case of damage or destruction by fire or other casualty or by Eminent Domain, in which events the obligations of Landlord shall be controlled by preceding Sections hereof. Landlord shall keep the BVAC unit in good working condition. It is expressly understood that Landlord shall not be responsible for any structural or exterior portions of the Premises not originally constructed by the Landlord nor any structural or exterior portions of the abutting buildings. (B) Repair by Tenant. Except as provided in Subsection 10 (A) Tenant shall keep the Premises and every part thereof and any fixtures, facilities or equipment contained therein, in good condition and repair. (C) Removal of Improvements. All items of Landlord's construction, all heating and air conditioning equipment, and all alterations, additions and other improvements by Tenant shall become the property of Landlord and shall not be removed from the Premises. All trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs iz: stalled in the premises by Tenant and paid for by Tenant shall remain the property of Tenant and may be removed upon the expiration of the term of this Lease; provided (i) that any of such items as are affixed to the Premises and require severance • 0 may be removed only if Tenant repairs any damage caused by such removal and (ii) that Tenant shall have fully performed all of the covenants and agreements to be performed by Tenant under the provisions of this Lease. If Tenant fails to remove such items from the Premises prior to the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, all such trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs shall become the property of the Landlord unless Landlord elects to require their removal, in which case Tenant shall promptly remove same and restore the Premises to its prior condition. In the event Tenant fails to remove all such trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs within ten (10) days after the Landlord elects to require their removal, Landlord shall have the right to remove same and sell such trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs to pay for the cost of removal. Tenant further agrees that all personal property of every kind or description which may at any time be in the premises shall be at the Tenant's sole risk, or at the risk of those claiming under the Tenant. Landlord shall not be responsible or liable to Tenant for any loss or damage that may be occasioned by the acts or omissions of persons occupying any space e:djacent to or adjoining Tenant's premises, or any part thereof. Landlord shall not be responsible or liable to Tenant for any loss or damage resulting to Tenant or its property from • roof leaks, water, gas, steam, fire, or the bursting, stoppage, or leaking of sewer pipes, or from the heating or plumbing fixtures, or from electric wires, or from gas or odors, or caused in any manner whatsoever. 11. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE: (A) Indemnification by Tenant. Tenant will indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against all loss, cost, expense, and liability whatsoever (including Landlord's cost of defending against the foregoing, such cost to include attorneys' fees) resulting or occurring by reason of the Tenant's construction, use or occupancy of the Premises. (B) Public Liability Insurance. Tenant agrees to carry public liability insurance covering the Premises and Tenant's use thereof, together with contractual liability endorsements covering Tenant's obligations set forth in Subsection ll(A), in companies and in a form satisfactory_to Landlord, with minimums of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) on account of bodily injuries to or death of one person, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) --on account of bodily injuries to or death of one or more than one person as a result of any occurrence and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) coverage for property damage, and to deposit said policy or policies (or certificates thereof) with Landlord prior to the • 7 date of any use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant; said • policy or policies shall name Landlord and Tenant as insureds and shall bear endorsements to the effect the insurer agrees to notify Landlord not less than thirty (30) days in advance of any modification or cancellation thereof. (C) Landlord's liability. Landlord shall not be liable (i) for any damage to Tenant's property located in the Premises, regardless of the cause of such damage, (ii) for any acts or omissions of other tenants of the building, nor (iii) for any condition of the Premises whatsoever unless Landlord is responsible for the repair thereof, and has failed to make such repair after notice from Tenant of the need therefore, and expiration of a reasonable time for the making of such repair. (D) Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance. Landlord agrees to carry policies insuring the improvements of the building against fire and such other perils as are normally covered by extended coverage endorsements in the county where the Premises are located, in an amount equal to at least eighty (80) percent of the insurable value of such improvements, together with insurance against such other risks (including loss of rent) and in such amounts as Landlord deems appropriate. Tenant agrees to notify Landlord in writing on the date of completion regarding the cost of any improvements installed in the Premises during the • term of this Lease other than trade fixtures, inventory, furniture, furnishings, signs or personal property of the Tenant. Tenant's failure to advise Landlord regarding the value of said improvements as provided herein shall constitute a waiver of Tenant's right to be reimbursed for said improvements in the event of destruction of the Premises. Tenant agrees that the total cost of the foregoing insurance shall be included in the Common Area charge as provided for in Subsection 6(B) of this Lease and that Tenant shall pay its proportionate share of the foregoing insurance per said Subsection; provided, however, that Tenant shall have no rights in said policy or policies maintained by Landlord and shall not, by reason of such reimbursement, be entitled to be a named insured thereunder. In the event any of the Landlord's policies insures Premises or risks other than the building or the rents therefrom, the statement of the insurer shall be conclusive as to the portion of the total premium attributable to the building. Tenant agrees to carry insurance against fire and such other risks as are, from time to time, included in standard extended coverage endorsements, insuring Tenant's stock -in- trade, trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, special equipment, floor and wall coverings, and all other items of personal property of Tenant located on or within the Premises, such coverage to be in an amount equal to at least eighty (80) percent of replacement cost thereof. Prior to possession Tenant shall furnish Landlord with a certificate evidencing such coverage. n 12. DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION. In the event the Premises are damaged by any peril covered by standard policies of fire and extended coverage insurance to an extent which is less than twenty -five (25) percent of the cost of replacement of the Premises, the damage shall, except as hereinafter provided, promptly be repaired by Landlord, at Landlord's expense but, that in no event shall Landlord by required to repair or replace Tenant's stock-in- trade, trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, equipment or personal property. In the event (a) the Premises are damaged to the extent of twenty -five (25) percent or more of the cost of replacement of the Premises,. (b) the buildings are damaged to the extent of fifty (50) percent or more of the cost of replacement, notwithstanding the extent of damages to the Premises,'or (c) any damage to the Premises occurs during the last five (5) years of the term of this Lease, Landlord may elect either to repair or rebuild the Premises or the buildings, as the case may be or to terminate this Lease upon giving notice of such election in writing to Tenant within ninety (90) days after the event causing tie damage. If the casualty, repairing, or rebuilding shall render the Premises untenantable, in whole or in part, a proportionate abatement of the Minimum Rent shall be allowed until the date Landlord completes the repairs or rebuilding. If Landlord is required or elects to repair the Premises, Tenant shall repair or replace its stock -in- trade, trade fixtures, • furniture, furnishings, equipment, and personal property in a manner and to at least a condition equal to that prior to its damage or destruction and the proceeds of all insurance carried by tenant shall be held in trust by Tenant for the purpose of such repair and replacement. 13. ASSIGNING AND SUBLETTING: Tenant shall not sublet the Premises or any part thereof nor assign this Lease, without in each case the prior written consent of Landlord. Any merger, consolidation or liquidation of Tenant or any other transfer of this Lease by operation of law shall constitute an assignment of this Lease. Tenant shall not permit any business to be operated in or from the Premises by any concessionaire or licensee without the prior written consent of Landlord. In the event that Tenant shall seek Landlord's consent, Tenant shall provide to Landlord the name, address and financial statement together with such other information as Landlord requires concerning the proposed assignee, sublessee, concessionaire, or licensee. It shall be a condition to any consent by Landlord that Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for any and all cost and expense, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys fees for the review and preparation of documents, which may be incurred by Landlord in connection with any of the foregoing. Any consent by Landlord • P to any assignment or subletting, or to the operation by a • concessionaire or licensee, shall not constitute a waiver of the necessity for such consent to any subsequent assignment or subletting or operation by a concessionaire or licensee. No consent by Landlord shall operate to relieve Tenant from primary liability for the performance of Tenant's obligations under this Lease. Any consent by Landlord shall not be unreasonably withheld. 14. EMINENT DOMAIN: In the event the building or any part thereof shall be taken or condemned either permanently or temporarily for any public or quasi - public use or purpose by any authority in appropriate proceedings or by any right of eminent domain, the entire compensation award thereof, including, but not limited to, all damages as compensation for diminution in value of the leasehold, reversion and fee, shall belong to the Landlord, without any deduction therefrom for any presnt or future estate of Tenant, and Tenant hereby assigns to Landlord all its right, title, and interest to any such award. However, Tenant shall have the right to recover from the condemning authority, but not from the Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded to Tenant on account of interruption of Tenant's business and for moving and relocation expenses. In the event of taking under the power of eminent • domain of (i) more than twenty -five (25) percent of the Premises or (ii) a sufficient portion of the building so that after such taking less than fifty (50) percent of the floor area in the front portion of the building located on Landlords property are occupied by Tenants, either Landlord or Tenant shall have the right to terminate this Lease by notice in writing given within ninety (90) days after the condemning authority takes possession, in which event all rents and other charges shall be prorated as of the date of such termination. 15. DEFAULT BY TENANT: If Tenant defaults in the payment of Minimum Rent or other charges or in the performance of any other of Tenant's obligations hereunder, and fails to remedy such default within ten (10) days after written notice from Landlord (unless the default relates to matters other than the payment of money and cannot be remedied within ten (10) days and Tenant commences to remedy such default.within (10) days after written notice from Landlord and thereafter diligently pursues correction thereof in which event the time to remedy such default shall be extended to the time reasonably required therefore), or if a receiver of any property of Tenant on the Premises is appointed or Tenant's interest in the Premises is levied upon by legal process or qi9 •- Tenant be adjudged bankrupt and Tenant fails within thirty (30) days to cause the vacation of such appointment, levy or adjudication, or if Tenant files a voluntary petition in bankruptcy, disposes of all or substantially all of its assets in bulk, or makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, then and in any such instance, without further notice to Tenant, Landlord may enter upon the premises and terminate this Lease. In the event of such termination, the obligations of Landlord hereunder shall cease without prejudice, subject however, to the right of Landlord to recover for Tenant any sums due Landlord for rent or otherwise including reasonable attorneys' fees, to the date of such entry, and also liquidated damages equal to any deficiency between the then rental value of the Premises for the unexpired portion of the term and the rent provided for that portion of the term, discounted at four (4) percent per annum to present net worth. In addition, Landlord may enter upon the Premises without terminating his Lease and may relet them in its own name for the account of Tenant for the remainder of the term at the highest rent then obtainable and immediately recover from Tenant any deficiency for the balance of the term between the amount for which the Premises were relet, less expense of reletting and the rent provided hereunder. If Landlord submeters electric current, gas, or water to the Premises, then if at any time Tenant fails to pay rent or other charges for the same • within ten (10) days after they are due, Landlord may, at its option, in addition to the foregoing remedies and without further notice to tenant, cease furnishing such electric current, gas or water. No failure of Landlord to enforce its right or remedies upon default of Tenant Shall prejudice or effect the rights of Landlord upon any subsequent or similar default. If Tenant at any time shall fail to pay any taxes, assessments, or liens, to make any payment or perform an act required by this Lease to be made or performed by it, Landlord, without waiving or releasing Tenant from any obligation or default under this Lease, may (but shall be under no obligation to) at any time thereafter make such payments or perform such act for the account and at the expense of Tenant. All sums so paid by Landlord and all costs and expenses so incurred including reasonable attorneys' fees, shall accrue interest at the rate of eight (8) percent (or the highest rate of interest allowable by law, whichever is the lesser) from the date of payment or incurring thereof by Landlord and shall constitute additional rent payable by Tenant under this Lease and shall be paid by Tenant to Landlord upon demand. All other sums payable by Tenant to Landlord under this Lease, if not paid when due, shall accrue interest at the rate of fifteen (15) percent (or the highest rate of interest allowable by law, whichever is the lesser) from their due date until paid, said interest to be so much additional rent . under this Lease and shall be paid to Landlord by Tenant upon demand. 11 All rights and remedies of Landlord herein enumerated shall be cumulative, and none shall exclude any other remedies allowed at law or in equity. 16. NOTICES: Any notice or consent required to be given by or on behalf of either party to the other shall be deemed given when nailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the Landlord at the address hereinabove specified, and to the Tenant at the address hereinabove specified, or the Premises, or at such other address as may be specified, from time to time by notice in the manner herein set forth. 17. MORTGAGE SUBORDINATION: (A) Upon written request or notice by Landlord, concurred in by any mortgagee or trustee of the building or by any person, firm or corporation intending to become such a nortcagee or trustee, Tenant agrees to subordinate its rights under this Lease to the liens of any mortgages or deeds of trust that may hereafter be placed upon the building and the Premises and to any and all advances to be made thereunder, and to the interest thereon, and all renewals, replacements, and extensions thereof. Tenant also agrees that any mortgagee or trustee may elect to have this Lease prior to the lien of its mortgage or deed of trust, and upon notification by such mortgagee or trustee to Tenant to that effect, this Lease shall be deemed prior in lien to the said mortgage or deed of trust, whether this Lease is dated prior to or subsequent to the date of said mortgage or trust deed. Tenant agrees that, upon the request of Landlord, any mortgagees, or any trustees named in such mortgages or trust deeds, it shall execute and deliver whatever instruments (in,luding but not limited to a Memorandum of Lease and /or a Non - Disturbance and Attornment Agreement in recordable form) which may be required for such purposes and to carry out the intent of this section. 18. QUIET ENJOYMENT: Landlord hereby covenants and agrees that if Tenant shall perform all the covenants and agreements herein stipulated to be performed on Tenant's part, Tenant shall at all times during the continuance hereof have the peaceable and quiet enjoyment and possession of the premises without any hindrance from Landlord or any person or persons lawfully claiming the Premises. 19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: (A) Accord and Satisfaction. No payment by Tenant or receipt by Landlord of a lessor amount than the rental herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than on account of the 0 0 12 • earliest stipulated rent nor shall any endorsement or statement on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as rent be deemed in accord and satisfaction, and Landlord may accept such check or payment without prejudice to Landlord's right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other remedy provided for in this Lease or available at law or in equity. (B) Waiver. No waiver of any condition or legal right or remedy shall be implied by the failure of Landlord to declare a forfeiture, or for any condition or covenant shall be valid unless it be in writing signed by Landlord. No waiver by Landlord -with respect to one or more tenants or occupants of the building shall constitute a waiver in favor of any other tenant, nor shall the waiver of a breach of any condition be claimed or pleaded to excuse a future breach of the same condition or covenant. (C) Broker's Commission. Tenant warrants that, except for any amounts payable by Landlord to its agent, there are no claims for broker's commissions or finder's fees in connection with its execution of this Lease and agrees to indemnify and save Landlord harmless from any liability that may arise from such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees. . (D) Lease Inures to the Benefit of Assignees. This Lease and all of the covenants, provisions, and conditions herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns respectively, of the parties hereto, provided, however, that no assignment by, from, through, or under however, Tenant in violation of the provisions hereof shall vest in the assigns any right, title, or interest whatever. (E) Entire Agreement. This Lease and the exh_bits attached hereto set forth all the covenants, promises, agreements, conditions, and understandings between Landlord and Tenant concerning the Premises and that there are no covenants, promises, agreements, conditions or understandings, either oral or written, between them other than are herein set forth. Except as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Lease shall be binding upon Landlord or Tenant unless reduced to writing and signed by them. (F) Surrender and Holding Over. Tenant shall deliver up and surrender to Landlord possession of the premises upon the expiration of the Lease, or its termination in any way, in as good condition and repair as the same shall be at the commencement of said term (damage by fire and other perils • 13 covered by standard fire and extended coverage insurance and ordinary wear and decay only excepted). Should Tenant remain in possession of the Premises after any termination of this Lease, no tenancy or interest in Premises shall result therefrom but such holding over shall be an unlawful detainer and all such parties shall be subject to immediate eviction and removal, and Tenant shall upon demand pay to Landlord, as liquidated damages, a suia equal to double the Minimum Rent as specified herein for any period during which Tenant shall hold the premises after the stipulated term of this Lease may have terminated. (G) Additional Rent. Any amounts to be paid by Tenant to Landlord pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, whether such payments are to be periodic and recurring or not, shall be deemed to be "Additional Rent" and otherwise subject to all provisions of this Lease and of law as to the default in the payment of rent. (H) Severability. In the event that any provision or section of this Lease is rendered invalid by the decision of any court or by the enactment of any law, ordinance or regulation, such provision of this Lease shall be deemed to have neve- been included therein and the balance of this Lease shall continue in effect in accordance with its terms. WHEREFORE, we have hereto set our hands this • day of , 19 Landlord: omas B. Dolder Tenant: CITY OF HUTCHINSON BY: ts: • 14 7:7 -i7 T Z I V 7Z:- Faniny jmsu cnemu /rArl rAar •w.�,mrr...eres.� 'IMf UI�MCI 0 December 19, 1990 LEASHO EQUIPMENT TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON STEREO AND SPEAKERS GAR AIRPLANE: TABLE AND CHAIRS 3 T:I SETS FRO AND BACK BAR LANIKI MACHINE GASH REGISTER'S PHONE. BOOTH WALE_ HAN {GINGS NEON! LIGHTS STOOLS RECORDS INTERIOR LEASEHOLD IMPROYENENTS EXHIBIT B • • DAVID E. ARNOLD CHARLES E. CARMICHAEL" OARY D. MODOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. BOOK LAURA E. PRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN PAUL D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICHARD O. MOOEE TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI 0 January 2, 1991 Hutchinson, MN 55350 A RNOLD & MGDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LA 5881 Gz DAB LARD ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492 �pO� (612) 545.9000 d" �\ MN ro1L rasE e00- 343 -4545 CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS J' TELECOPIER (512)545 -193 WX I The Honorable Paul Ackland v 148 Hassan South v im" Mr. Randy DeVries Wastewater Treatment 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 vl�-. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Mr. John Rodeberg Director of Engineering 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: Hutch, Inc. Agreement Our File No. 3188 -90 -0175 Gentlemen: OF OOURSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON CHARLES CLAYTON OAST W. DECKER 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55391 (812) 389.2214 TELECOPIER(612) 389-5505 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (812) 55] -7575 TELECOPIER (812) 587-4095 /kbo,� . &Y Enclosed please find a revised draft of the Agreement between Hutch, Inc. and the City of Hutchinson. There are a couple of provisions in the Agreement that were not discussed at the city council meeting that I felt might be appropriate for the further protection of the interests of the city. For example, I have included a provision that the Agreement shall run for a period of one year (to December 31, 1991) and will thereafter run on a month -to -month basis. I am assuming that the city would have more interest in escaping from this agreement than Mr. Block. If that is not the case, we should change the language with respect to the term. * CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION �� . The Honorable Paul Ackland Mr. Randy DeVri @s Mr. Gary D. Plotz Mr. John Rodeberg January 2, 1991 Page 2 I have also provided that the City, in the event of a default by Mr. Block of his obligations under the Agreement, may rely on the use of the master meter for sanitary sewer billing purposes. I have intentionally left the rate language for calculation of sanitary sewer service out of the Agreement; I assume that rate may change from time to time or the City may choose a different method for calculating sanitary sewer bills and I see no reason to lock the City into an agreement with Mr. Block on that issue. Finally, I have basically made the Agreement "personal" between Block and the City. The first draft that I prepared provided that the Agreement "ran with the land" meaning that all subsequent owners of the mobile home park would be bound by it. Upon further reflection, since we do not know how well this experiment is going to work, I would just as soon not create any property right that . Mr. Block might assign to some subsequent purchaser and somehow bind the City of following an agreement. We may very well want that language at a later date, but it seems to me we can wait for the results of this experiment before making that commitment. I believe the Agreement is basically ready for City Council approval unless other changes are felt to be necessary. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Best regards. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & McDOWELL G. Barry Anderson GSA /kt Enclosure • 0 This Agreement is made this _ day of , 1991, by and between Hutch, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City of Hutchinson ( "City "), a Minnesota municipal corporation. RECITALS: 1. Hutch, Inc. is the owner of certain property located in McLeod County, legally described as set forth on attached Exhibit "A"; 2. Hutch, Inc. operates a mobile home park on the above- described property; 3. The City provides water and sewer services to the property and has consistently followed procedures set forth in city ordinances for the provision and billing of such services; • 4. The parties desire to clarify the rights and responsibilities of each with respect to billing, collection and maintenance of water and sanitary sewer services. NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: 1. Hutch, Inc. shall install, operate and maintain water meters for all units now located in the mobile home park and all units brought into the park after the date of this Agreement. The water meters shall be of a type and style approved by the City. Purchase of the water meters by Hutch, Inc. shall be accomplished in the same manner as with all other water meter sales within the City. J 9 2. Meters shall be installed consistent with procedures, rules and regulations established by the City and installation a shall be completed no later than June 1, 1991. 3. The City shall bill Hutch, Inc. for water service to the property described on Exhibit " A " based on the master meter for the entire parcel. 4. The City shall bill Hutch, Inc. on a quarterly basis for sanitary sewer service. The billing shall be based on water usage as determined by total water usage measured by individual meters. The actual calculation of the rate for sanitary sewer service shall be consistent with City procedure as established by the sole discretion of the City. 5. Hutch, Inc. shall be responsible for reading all individual water meters and billing individual water meters for water and sanitary sewer service. Hutch, Inc. shall provide to the City all billing information which the City, in its sole discretion, determines is needed to bill the sanitary sewer service charges to Hutch, Inc. Hutch, Inc. agrees to make billing records available for inspection at any reasonable time upon request by the City. 6. The City shall give written notice to Hutch, Inc. at least seven days prior to the scheduled meter reading date. All meters, including the master meter and individual unit meters, shall be read on the same date. LJ 7. In the event of a default by Hutch, Inc. in any of its obligations as set forth in this Agreement, the City may, at its sole option, charge Hutch, Inc. for sanitary sewer service based on the master meter reading. 8. This Agreement shall run for a period of one year from January 1, 1991 through December 31, 19991. Thereafter, unless terminated by either party in writing, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect on a month -to -month basis and may be terminated by any party upon thirty days written notice to the other party. 9. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall be construed as, a waiver by the City of any rights the City may have under existing ordinances, statutes or customary practices and procedures. It is understood and agreed that Hutch, Inc. • undertakes the purchase, insulation, maintenance and billing responsibility for individual units in the mobile home at its own risk and without any recourse to the City. 10. Notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall be served on the parties as follows: To the City: City Administrator Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 With a copy to: Hutchinson City Attorney G. Barry Anderson 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 To Hutch, Inc.: • 11. Hutch, Inc. may not sell, assign, encumber or otherwise transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the express written permission of the City. HUTCH, INC. Dated: , 1991. By Its CITY OF HUTCHINSON Dated: , 1991. By Paul Ackland, Mayor Attest: Gary D. Plotz STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss: COUNTY OF McLEOD ) On this day of 1991, personally appeared before me, a Notary Public, , who is the of Hutch, Inc., a Minnesota corporation and acknowledged that he executed the above on behalf of the corporation as the free act and deed of said corporation. Notary Public I] STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss: COUNTY OF McLEOD ) On this day of , 1991, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Paul L. Ackland, Mayor of the City of Hutchinson, on behalf of the City, a municipal corporation in the State of Minnesota, County of McLeod, to me known to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument on behalf of the City of Hutchinson and acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and deed. Notary Public Drafted By: G. Barry Anderson ARNOLD & McDOWELL 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 Telephone: (612)587 -7575 Attorney I.D. No. 196X • Bba131881175- doc.01 (612) 587 -5151 x1mm CITY OF HUTCHINSON • 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 January 18, 1991 MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT UPDATE The attached request was received by the staff and pertains to the recently imposed freeze on capital equipment. Equipment Chief Steve Schramm feels the work must be done immediately. This comes both from a safety stand point, and OSHA requirement. In addition the rehab of equipment lost in a recent fire could be done at a cost savings. The monies were budget but with Council approval to go ahead • equipment. the recent freeze requires City with the updates and rehab of /o -A, HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT 205 Third Avenue South East HUTCH INSON. MINNESOTA 55350 MEMORANDUM DATE: 1117191 TO: Mayor and Cow FROM: Brad Emans, Fire Chief and Steve Schramm, Asst. Chief SUBJECT: EQUIPMENT NEEDS The Hutcwuson Fie Department is requesting the purchase of 2 new SCBA (self contained • breathing apparatus) units, 9 new SCBA air bottles and updating 4 other wits, The 2 new SCBA wits are to replace 2 units that are too old to be updated and are MegW to use. This will help bring us to cw pkmw with OSHA and NFPA. These items are in the 1991 budget and we need them row. Also we need approval to repay or replace the 2 SCBA units that were damaged in the flashback incident. This could be done at the same time as the other 4 updates. As of January 1, 1991, we are short equipment because of the 2 outdated and 2 damaged wits and the 9 battles that are outdated and we can no longer use. Any questions please call Steve Schramm or Brad Emans. The approAmate cost for the budgeted items: $9,500.00 to update the 2 damaged tats 1,000.00 Thank you, Brad Emans, Fire Chief Steve Sclramm, Asst. Chief /o -74 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991 L] _ W ATER & SEWER FUND 1990 DPC Harris Mechanical NuTech Plaza Hardware Reliance Electric 1991 • • *US Postmaster *Merle Meece *US Postmaster *Withhold Tax *Hutch Telephone Aagard West AWNA Boustead Electric Bro °Tex City of Hutch City of Hutch Crow Chemical & Ltg Curtin Scientific DNR Fadden Pump Hanson, Scott Hutch Utilities Isco Leeds & Northrup Meece, Merle MN Valley Testing MN Rural Water Assc MN Mutual Life Ins MN Section CSWPCA Mutual Benefit Life MWOA PERA Quade Electric VWR Scientific Water Pollution Control cylinders 10.00 air dryer 765.57 counteractant 1,088.50 supplies 11.59 input seal 74.37 1991 mail permit 60.00 seminar expense 150.00 postage for water bills 115.87 employer contribution 777.71 telephone service 254.61 Jan curbside & apts 1,397.10 subscription 85.00 oil seal 57.07 dispenser 102.79 Jan medical 2,745.77 Jan dental 337.81 cleaner 18.04 cleaning compound 16.59 well permits 3,109.50 shaft 89.64 seminar expense 29.64 electricity 513.47 repair 39.80 compensator 90.09 conference expense 11.17 sanple kit 8.00 1991 dues 100.00 Jan life ins 45.99 reg- DeVries & Lanz 50.00 Jan LTD ins 109.57 8 memberships 80.00 employer contribution 415.89 repairs 222.88 gloves 104.46 dues 109.00 TOTAL $13,197.49 // 7q 2 CENTRAL GARAGE • 3.990 Plaza Hardware 1991 *Withholding Tax City of Hutch City of Hutch Mutual Benefit Life MIT Mutual Life PEP.A GENERAL FUND 1990 *Fina *Algy *Blasia . *Leo's *Curtain Call Costumes *Wolff- Fording *Illinois Theatrical Amoco Bennett Bell Industries Crow River vet Culligan Water Erickson Oil Hutch Plumbing Hutch Utilites Internal Revenue Service Jeseritz, Dorothy Lake Jennie Repair Logis Marco MN Elevator Ols:n's Locksmith Plaza Hardware Quade Electric Rettke, Kate Schroeder, Randy Secretarian Seven West Wash • Xerox Zieman, Sharon supplies 6.24 employer contribution 98.14 Jan medical 329.21 Jan dental 43.79 Jan LTD ins 12.87 Jan life ins 5.46 employer contribution 57.48 TOTAL $553.19 ice show costumes 44.75 ice show costumes 548.45 ice show costumes 101.30 ice show costumes 155.50 ice show costumes 151.00 ice show costumes 42.95 ice show costumes 47.25 fuel 358.73 service contract 48.83 deicer 344.37 kennel fees & K -9 fees 487.35 repair 30.00 film & fuel 110.46 furnace repair 56.00 fluor lamps 75.60 addl Fed excise tax 35.85 refund skating 15.00 Dec lease 150.00 clerks index system 120.00 typewriter & service 639.00 Dec service 59.45 supplies 28.15 supplies 17.78 service 45.95 refund gymnastics 11.00 refund playtown 10.00 services- M.Swanson 603.50 washes 7.80 1035 usage 466.10 mileage 20.50 1991 • *Steve Madsen FBI school 712.50 *John Gregor authorized expense 1,500.00 *Richard Cox service of process 50.00 *DNR registration fees 132.00 *DNR registration fees 904.00 *MN CLE reg- R.Waage 100.00 *DNR watercraft fees 46.00 *DNR registration fees 880.00 *Steven Mogard school 58.00 *Priority One land option 500.00 *Hometown Rlty land option 500.00 *Myron Wigen land option 500.00 *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 4,692.09 *Russell Ackem<,n partial pymt airport land 20,000.00 *Hutchinson Telephone telephone service 1,110.81 *JaL.,s Reilein /R.Chaffee land option 500.00 *Lyle Emme rec program presentation 20.00 *John Gregor authorized expenses 1,500.00 *DNR watercraft fees 29.00 *INR registration fees 725.00 Alexander Battery North supplies 1 =5.03 American Cemetery renewal 18.00 Arnold & McDowell compensation 3,084.00 ASCAP 1991 dues 225.00 Milt Jan rent 175.00 • Brinkman, Buytaert, Patty costumes 195.00 Century Labs supplies 127.53 Chamber of Commerce 1991 membership 45.00 City of Hutch Jan medical 22,176.22 City of Hutch Jan dental 2,843.23 CMFRA 1991 dues 20.00 Copy Eq,xipment supplies 124.48 County Treasurer DL fees 91.00 Culligan Jan service 15.50 Dataquest books 411.00 Dept Labor & Ind license- Forcier 10.00 Dose, Dave basketball official 126.00 Economics Press renewal 19.73 Eileen Goeders Estate contract payment 1,500.00 Electro Watchman alarms 180.00 Field, George conference expenses 60.84 Fogg, Michael basketball official 90.00 GFOA subscription renewal 55.00 Glencoe Uniforms uniforms 170.45 HCVN cable tv 2,750.00 Hensen, Mark conference expense 162.82 Hutch Utilities electricity 18,663.98 Intl Assc Chiefs Police 1991 dues 100.00 Int'1 Soo Fire Svc dues 60.00 J & M Trucking pumping tanks 62.50 • Journal subscription 70.00 K -Mart wastebasket 9.97 League of MN Cities 1991 directory 111.00 Linder, Paul basketball official 252.00 \I Maintenance Engineering lamps 125.40 • Marco Marlc:a, Jim cover conference expense 4.45 179.80 Mattsf_ield,Brad safety boots 30.00 McGarvey Coffee coffee 54.90 MCPOA 1991 dues 25.00 Min Comm Paging Jan rent 25.22 MN Dept of Agr pesticide license 10.00 MN State: Fire Chiefs 1991 memberships 90.00 MN Rec & Park 1991 dues 240.00 MN PIE reg- M.Schnobrich 35.00 MN State Fire Dept Assc 1991 dues 130.00 MN Dept Public Safety bike registrations 5.00 MN Sports Fed sanctioning 32.00 MN Mutual Life Ins Jan Life ins 370.65 MN Sports Fed sanctioni - .g 190.00 MN Public Transit 1991 dues 50.00 Mutual Benefit Life Jan LTD ins 882.74 Nat'l Arbor Day 1991 dues 15.00 North Star Chap ICBO 2 memberships 60.00 Our Savior's Lutheran coupon refund 19.50 PEFA employer contribution 4,825.87 Perfo Inc computer paper 204.12 Quast, Esther /Marty Roof small cities loan 8,637.65 Schlueter Refrig repair 274.25 Shopko hangars 15.11 Streichers ammunition 36.45 • Tauer, Ken refund volleyball 25.00 US West Jan service 98.54 US ID Manual subscription 62.50 VanderHagen, Paul basketball official 180.00 Viking International supplies 71.48 Witt, Chuck turnout gear 375.00 Zee Medical supplies 45.00 Zieman, Sharon tapes 21.66 TOTAL $110,889.59 \I BOND FUNDS . YOUTH CENTER 1990 Darrin Watson 1991 *Withhold Tax Act PERA Star Cablevision Thomas Dolder Joe Hausladen MN Rec & Park City of Hutch City of Hutch Mutual Benefit Life MN Mutual Life Ins 198C TAX INC DEBT SERV Esther Quast & Marty Roof 1990 TAX INC CONST 1990 . Wilson Dev Sery 1991 *Omar & Velma Collis *Ford & Delaine Rolfe *McLeod Treasurer *Robert Elliott 1990 CONST BONDS State of MN Dept Transp 1981 PARKING BONDS First Chicago REC & POOL FUND DEBT SERV Am Nat'l Bank BONDS OF 1988 DEBT SERV An Nat'l Bank • BONDS OF 1983 Norwest Bank band services 45.00 employer contribution 58.91 employer contribution 34.59 Jan cable 24.30 Jan rent 2,200.00 light show 65.00 annual dues 60.00 Jan medical 147.10 Jan dental 15.64 Jan LTD ins 10.09 Jan life ins 4.20 TOTAL $2,664.74 8% HCDC loan 3,276.35 relocation services 2,087.47 land purchase 71,960.95 land purchase 25,844.85 deed stamps 409.20 relocation expenses 20,000.00 TOTAL $120,302.47 special agreements 40,041.50 payment fees 400.00 bond principal & interest 43,625.00 bond principal & interest 257,500.00 principal & interest 116,675.00 0 BONDS 198 First Chicago 1981 FIRE HALL DEBT SERV First Chicago 1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV First Trust BONDS OF 1987 DE3T SERV Am Nat'l Bank BONDS OF 1989 DEBT SERV Am Natl Bank LIQUOR FUND Henry's Foods City of Hutch City of Hutch City of Hitch Withhold Tax Ed Phillips Griggs Cooper Johnson Bros Liquor Quality Wines principal & interest 193,520.00 principal & interest 73,218.75 principal & interest 65,144.38 agent fees 177.25 principal & interest 163,031.25 supplies 1,356.91 lottery sales 239.00 lottery sales 214.00 payroll 5,125.94 employer contributions 350.94 wine & liquor 3,174.09 wine & liquor 1,219.01 wine & liquor 3,940.23 wine & liquor 2,070.85 TOTAL $17,690.97 0 772 '0 Fa. JOHN J. BERNHAGEN Assistant Minority Leader Senator 21st District Route 1, Box 122 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Phone: (612) 587 -6508 During Session: 113 State Office Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Phone: (612) 296 -4131 January 17, 1991 TO: Cities in Senate District 21 FROM: Senator John Bernhagen RE: Local Government Aid Cuts lti �� �� ,,r -- K; 1 , ^1. FOn 105" �rOs,�VI►,T'�J" Today I received a report from the Department of Revenue that describes the cuts that will be made based on one of the recommendations for balancing the shortfall in the current biennium, 1990 -91. e It is my understanding these July payment. As far as the one -time borrowing from the immediately on July 1, 1991 1992 -93 fiscal year based on cities. cuts will be a reduction from the state is concerned it will be a rainy day fund, being repaid -- in the beginning of the state's the amounts of the reduction to I will attempt to keep you posted as we try to deal with the cuts needed to balance the state's budget. I believe the administration recognizes these are dollars previously allocated which are now a part of your commitment in performing the necessary services to your community. • COMMITTEES • Economic Development & Housing • Environment & Natural Resources Rules & Administration • Taxes & Tax Laws • Transportation Senate State of Minnesota 111 KILLIOI USE cur; • ISf7AAT11 I IAf 1911 t.11tslll FINAL FINAL CEnIFIU CITY ►01tIA1 PAT Ifll 102 loll 11"al" 111 091 1911 PAT 91 owl 91 clftlnt► TACOnrI 1111110[ of 1111111 . CO t7T ........_ CIE City IAIE ......................... ............................... LGA 149A1 All PACA ...................................................................................__............_..... owA 1111 All list IASI ; UA cut 60 111 cat I/CA .....___.........._.._......... cut NI COT lowly CUT 10 1100 I VATCR11111 251,214 10.217 102.611 If,1S1 211,611 511,011 11.111 11.904 1 0 4 1 11 0100 1 RASOfA 11,255 1.211 11,512 1 RIMS 11,101 11111 1.111 1 1 4 1 411100 1IIAIIOE 111.152 14,186 11,11? 5.947 1I,SS9 111,111 1,210 4,260 1 1 1 1 41 0111 1 RICA 1.611 1339 I 5.121 21.111 12,111 ill 661 1 1 1 1 II 1501 111LF1 114.710 20,219 11.016 11 161,651 123,121 i,s11 6.561 1 1 1 1 11 it 1 IEINICIS MIMI 12,171 29,SIS 1,113 11,011 111,751 1,110 0 1 1 0 4 II If 1 IAA! I11TO1 116,616 20,971 51 33,17§ 111.121 190,911 3 3,19E 1 1 1 1 41 45N I ILOIEICE 1,391 111 1.902 It 1,219 11,519 2S1 PSI 1 0 1 1 11 NN 1 typo 11.961 1,121 16,002 I 11.115 11.329 1,611 1,612 1 1 1 1 421100 1111S11LL 1 01319 119,511 5,215 1 1.991,116 10.657 61,657 1 1 1 1 420210 1 IILAI01 96.161 0.117 S1.143 1.111 166,106 111.321 $,ill 5,610 1 1 0 1 it 1101 I II IIFOIA 116.762 I0,319 10,1S1 1.111 112,$11 151,111 1,111 1.219 1 1 0 0 12 0100 I CARIII 26.011 1.061 11,171 MAY 11,110 11,171 ]ms 1,315 4 1 0 1 121200 1lossrl,l 61.111 111,511 16.101 6.526 51.161 111,221 2.101 1.101 0 1 1 0 12 1400 I TRACT 129.641 6S,171 162,111 11,512 210.511 191,911 11,111 11,117 1 1 0 1 12 0100 1 CRAY 11,310 5,111 11.161 132 ISMS 11,101 1.502 I,SDD 1 0 1 0 42 4101 1 COi711101O1A 01,716 26.129 S4,S72 I 195,142 111,011 1,111 ; 4,30 1 1 0 1 12 1101 1 TAUNTON 5.161 595 11611 0 Llli 11,111 212 111 1 1 1 1 Il PLO$ I PLATO ISMS 1.119 10,591 II,SIO 15,310 161,101 2,110 1,111 a 1 1 0 111100 IIISCAT 2.111 ITS 4.111 1 1.119 11,199 221 127 1 1 1 1 17 Opo0 1 SILVER LAU 11.112 1$.929 70.710 11,611 111.151 20,972 1.111 1.911 1 1 1 1 --� 43 IAN I MRCIIFMiar^ 1.111.911 171,121 116,28 11.116 1,511,691 1,116,011 11,119 51,119 1 1 1 4 43 1100 I CLIOCOE $71.110 11,511 01.512 11,611 122,161 1,119.11s 11.131 21,151 1 1 0 4 it 1100 1 /11STE1 211.111 11,016 100,311 119SI 111.409 511,511 11,204 11.201 1 1 1 1 111200 10/1091101 95.159 is,111 $5.303 11,107 111,151 151,111 5,212 5,211 1 1 1 4 11 0100 1 STEWART� 96.910 15,58 51.111 11,58 111.01 111.01 5.946 5.946 1 Il Me 1 LESTER PRIME 07.017 11,141 96,501 5.110 29140 121,611 1,611 1.167 0 0 0 0 11 4149 1 FAAMIIEI 211.1ss 21,70 61,511 2S,14S 114.579 - 111.651 1,515 1.515 0 1 0 1 14 OS01 I MISS 21.011 1,111 0.18 1.10 19,1$2 61.290 1.3m I.Ist 6 B 0 e 11 0104 1 A049 16.295 254 All it 7.321 11.175 111 Ill 1 0 1 B 45 0101 1 MAIM 16.711 515 1.195 0 5.20 22.599 451 160 0 0 6 0 1511!0 1IMOLOEI 0.211 7.06 12.021 1.211 31,00 11,710 1.911 1.90 0 0 0 E I9 SIPS 1 PALO $1.127 9.00 11.961 11.2A1 110,551 18.195 11,07. 1,007 0 0 0 0 Is 02 1 Atlyl.i 10.167 15.603 21,021 0 71,111 201,115 1.225 1.225 0 0 e 0 1! 1200 1 STFIUFA $2.111 1.3s) 10.015 1 MISS 1110.11$ 1.68 1.68 0 0 6 0 15 000 1 KIM 4.112 496 1.051 0 2.619 MOAT 761 201 0 0 a 0 IS 1301 1 STEAII'NISI 10,120 2117 171 1 1.791 12.111 216 He 1 1 0 0 is 1500 1 VAE1f1 211.322 16.129 11,211 0 133,9Sf 161,110 1.112 1,112 1 0 0 1 15 0700 E FIDDLE 11111 11.39 55S 1.511 0 1.211 10.110 611 611 1 I 1 0 IS #$to I rtYCLA 10.119 1.192 (.ISO IMP 22.911 17215 1.141 1.111 1 0 1 1 IS IIOO I 11111 19.01 1.601 2.Al$ 115 5.641 26.116 $I? ' SIT 1 0 1 1 116700 1 00171t19 16.111 2311 12,01 104 10,82 49.660 1.0a6 1.001 0 1 0 1 46 1900 1 sAFtltMi 11610) TA,III 101,214 13,511 101.01 111.213 10.017 11.071 0 0 1 1 16 Me 1 601IADA 13.111 I.TSI 11,157 Ile )LOSS 11,111 IJIS 1.613 1 0 0 1 16 RIPS I TRIIOAf 111.111 20,651 4J,AS1 MAY 155.217 106,295 6.101 1.167 0 4 1 0 16 0100 1 CF.TLOI 45,111 7,116 42.514 ISMS II5.IA4 161,111 1.111 1,111 1 1 1 1 IE 1200 I FROM 114.922 11.491 14.611 1.112 ARMS 116,111 - 1.212 1.232 1 1 1 1 If 1104 1 MYORT 111.663 16.922 0,151 3,19 IaI.SII 231395 1.111 1,113 0 0 1 0 SU01AI7 AWAY CITItl ISO AILL101 COT COURT All I'AT 1111 fly 1111 fly 1511 1 of 1 or C,UnTIT All 1RIIrt1 UNITS IITI UNITS IITI All AM RI 111 TOTAL 11 a All 10 11 111 ACA little 116.M.S1T 11.133.111 145.171.116 n a lot Met) 161.781,111 1.321321 157.01.111 It 211 CITY TOTAL 1111 (15,151.121 1251.!11,211 11 64 10UILIIA11111 AIA I6TRO 2.111,711 4.111 2.517.215 61 11 001 -116110 6.111.911 1.117 II.M.111 22 27 ant TOTAL (11,415.616 11.125 111.111.115 is to uCA IFTRO 55.112.616 1.420,100 WIS7.S16 1 11 IN frill) 17.037.771 251.210 ft.711.011 1 5 CITY TOTAL IISI!11,111 11.AT1.115 1156,111,511 4 I5 ICA IFT10 1,056.116 0 1 111 111 /O0 111110 11.11A.n7 14 11.221.111 711 211 CITY TOTAL 111.171.467 111 111.211.651 M 117 TOTAL 111 IITIO 256.101.116 11.310,111 212 .36.01 1 lA NO RTTrO 214.531.010 1.171.111S IWIS2.115 1 7 CITY TOTAL 4S11331.11A 121,512,210 1111,211,676 1 IT MEMORANDUM DATE: RE: CGMC Member Cities Tim Flaherty January 17, 1991 Governor's Proposed Budget Cuts FOR YOUR INFORf44AT10►1 Governor Carlson has released his proposal for balancing the state's 1990 -91 budget. This proposal includes $50 million in cuts in state aids to cities, towns and counties. The cuts would be equal to 2.052% of each city's revenue base (total certified levy plus LGA). An estimate of these amounts for Coalition cities is attached. These estimates are based on your 1990 levies and aids. The actual cuts based on 1991 figures will be somewhat larger. These cuts would be taken from your July aid payment. The Governor has indicated that even larger cuts from the December payment are being considered Of course, there will be no opportunity in 1991 to increase your property tax levies to make up for this loss of revenue. It is important to oppose this proposal now. If cities do not voice their concern and opposition, even larger cuts are likely later in the session. This proposal may move very quickly through the Legislature- perhaps passing as early as the end of next week. It is vital few days. The following are some of the key issues that cities should raise. • Most of this biennium's budget deficit is caused by state spending increases. Cities didn't contribute to the problem, and they and their residents should not have to pay for it. • The state is trying to shift its budget problem onto cities rather than cutting state programs or using state reserves. This will leave hundreds of cities to deal with the fiscal mess created by the state. • Governor Carlson has said that no state layoffs would be needed, but they may be needed in cities. This is an unfair and inappropriate solution to a problem caused by state spending. The Coalition will be meeting on Wednesday, January 23 at 2:00 P.M. This will be an important meeting and all Coalition members should try to attend. If you can arrive early, spend some time at the Capitol meeting with your legislators about this issue. TPF /cm o1•n -1991 e I f COALITION OF GREATER MINNESOTA CITIES THE BRIGGS wnd MORGAN PROPERTY TAX MODEL .......................................................................................... ............................... CGMC91. 002 -- IMPACT OF GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED AID CUTS ON CITIES ...................................................................................... ............................... COALITION OF GREATER MINNESOTA CITIES 0 90 TMR EST 91 LGA EST 91 CUT ALBERT LEA 93.16 3,564,109 - 119,474 ALEXANDRIA 98.41 1,147,572 - 52,552 AUSTIN 116.68 3,819,045 - 154,317 BEMIDJI 110.67 2,118,076 - 63,212 BENSON 98.64 729,780 - 20,596 BRAINERD 87.48 1,817,954 -73,484 BRECKENRIDGE 94.33 907,501 - 25,655 CAMBRIDGE 108.34 325,714 - 20,488 CLOQUET 119.09 1,787,145 - 89,412 CROOKSTON 104.95 1,519,671 -62,001 DETROIT LAKES 113.19 1,094,076 -40,729 EAST GRAND FORKS 110.81 1,288,961 - 59,229 FAIRMONT 91.21 1,857,707 - 71,167 FARIBAULT 106.28 3,060,480 - 103,669 FERGUS FALLS 101.77 2,412,996 - 84,506 GOODVIEW 113.97 163,194 - 15,551 GRAND RAPIDS 105.23 1,188,437 - 58,142 HUTCHINSON 119.87 1,190,270 - 76,455 INTERNATIONAL FALLS 103.23 1,592,421 - 73,159 JACKSON 90.01 689,821 - 26,467 LAKE CITY 105.41 620,007 - 28,345 LE SUEUR 104.53 554,168 - 20,377 LITCHFIELD 88.44 853,289 - 34,961 LITTLE FALLS 113.85 1,368,627 - 47,484 LUVERNE 94.50 850,327 - 27,072 MANKATO 102.48 4,401,051 -223,909 MARSHALL 96.65 1,256,860 - 59,032 MOORHEAD 107.24 3,918,172 - 136,950 NORA 109.19 393,452 -13,376 MORRIS 106.09 811,580 - 34,090 NEW ULM 88.40 2,201,502 - 85,128 NORTH MANKATO 99.64 1,357,320 - 62,117 NORTHFIELD 120.82 1,240,162 - 68,940 OWATONNA 106.94 2,483,833 -122,629 - PIPESTONE 90.34 670,357 - 26,204 REDWOOD FALLS 115.44 804,178 - 35,813 ROCHESTER 109.52 6,213,244 - 410,004 SARTELL 109.85 230,508 - 23,025 SAUK RAPIDS 104.97 887,118 - 35,330 - ST CLOW 106.33 5,777,461 - 329,317 ST JAMES 97.00 680,660 - 23,351 ST PETER 118.46 972,197 - 40,540 THIEF RIVER FALLS 147.42 941,270 - 49,819 WASECA 95.26 1,276,831 - 46,817 WILLMAR 101.85 2,111,028 - 86,504 WINDOM 131.95 537,220 - 30,459 WINONA 109.99 4,078,464 - 177,226 WORTHINGTON 108.82 1,544,497 - 75,716 GROUP TOTALS 106.39 81,310,313 -3,644,801 0 FOR YOUR IfVFOR1tATi0N PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD December 10, 1990 Present: Arlen LaCombe Representing: Big Stone County Judy Bohm Chippewa County Dorothy Tebben Chippewa County Stan Jacobson Chippewa County Peg Mossberg Kandiyohi County Howard Christiansen " Kandiyohi County LeRoy Jans ' Lac Qui Parle County Jan Kreie McLeod County Joanne Sneer McLeod County Shirley Nowak " McLeod County Marie Schoener ' Meeker County Howard Turck Meeker County John Miller " Meeker County Gale Dahlager Renville County Lorna Carlson " Swift County Nancy Aaseth Bird Island John Nevins Dawson Noel Phifer Glencoe Sandy Casper Graceville Maxine Weinrich - Granite Falls Delores Brunner " Hutchinson Howard Tengwall Kerkhoven Nancy Alsop Litchfield Judy Oestreich Litchfield John Schulstad " Madison Helen Mahnke Monte Matheson Olivia Ortonville Jeanette Buchanan Willmar Carol Conradi Willmar Ric Emery " Willmar Absent: LaVerna Birkland* Representing: Kandiyohi County Dean Aarvig Kandiyohi County Nancy Dickson Renville County John Langan Swift County Lois Anderson* Yellow Medicine County Myron Hagelstrom Yellow Medicine County Elizabeth Erickson* Appleton Richard Baysinger* ' Benson - Millie Woller Fairfax Dale Degner Hector William Scherer* Hutchinson Kevin Mulder* Renville Also Present: Burton Sundberg, Director Kathy Matson, Associate Director Visitors: David Lauritsen, Chippewa County Library Barb Hauer, Ortonville Librarian ;.nn Lauer, Graceville Librarian Bill Pollard, SAMMIE Director The Pioneerland Library System board meeting was held December 10, 1990, 7:30 p.m. President Ric Emery called the meeting to order. V11 call was taken using a pass - around sheet. Burton Sundberg listed those board members who had called and were unable to attend. He also made a correction in the November meeting minutes stating Joanne Sneer's absence was an excused one. Gifts of appreciation were presented to four retiring board members, Jeanette Buchanan, Shirley Nowak, Stan Jacobson, and John Langan. A motion was passed to approve the November 12 minutes (Buchanan /Mossberg). A motion was passed for the acceptance of the November finan:ial report (Conradi/ LaCombe). , The report of the director was given by B. Sundberg and R. Emery gave a president's report explaining some of the library's important services. He also explained that no secret ballots are to be cast at open meetings and that two proposals will be voted upon again tonight, both of which had previously been voted on by secret ballots last month. Two visiting librarians from Big Stone County were introduced. They were Barb Hauer, Ortonville, and Ann Lauer, Graceville. Each responded briefly. K. Matson reported monthly statistics and passed around clippings. More statistical information will be available in January showing library use for all of 1990. K. Matson also reported the staff Christmas party had recently been held in Kerkhoven and that she had also participated in and attended a staff training meeting on customer service. Three staff workshops are planned for 1991. A letter has been prepared to be sent to Natalie Quinn, who plans to retire in January. A motion was passed instructing the president to sign this (Buchanan/ Conradi). A motion was passed to approve the bills (LaCombe /Dahlager). Bill Pollard, SAMMIE Director, was present and gave the SAMMIE update. The Ad Hoc Agreement study Committee report was given by Mr. Turck. Voting on proposals from the Committee will be done by roll call under old business. A memo was read by David Lauritsen representing the roundtable and staff organiza- tion expressing appreciation for the pay increases for 1991. A proposal from Meeker County was read by R. Emery. A motion was passed to table this until later under new business (Matheson /Schulstad). K. Matson presented the MLA Legislative Platform and other proposals regarding state aid. Howard Christiansen reported a replacement is being secured for Dean Aarvig who recently resigned from the board. A letter from the Bird Island City Council and also a letter of response was read by President R. Emery. A drawing was held for a turkey. Board members who had talked to their governing units about the proposals to be voted upon had chances and the winner was Delores Brunner. The board took a fiv'minute break. Mr. Turck and Mr. Phifer again explained the Ad Hoc Committee proposals. A motion was passed to bring the Meeker County Proposal off the table (Christiansen /Jacobson). John Miller explained it and discussion followed. A motion was passed to allow the Meeker County proposal to be voted upon (Miller /Schoener). Coins were tossed to determine the order of the proposal voting. All three proposals failed to achieve a 758 majority approval. Proposal t3: that each county have two representatives each making a total of 18 board members (8 yes, 22 no). Proposal il: that each governing jurisdiction have one member but that each member's vote value correspond to present number of board members from that jurisdiction, i.E., 26 members with a total vote value of 44,(11 yes, 19 no). Proposal i2: that each governing juris- diction have one member and that each member would have one vote, 26 members (21 yes, 9 no). A motion was passed to table the issue of a change in funding formula to an equal per capita until more information comes from the state (Turck /Brunner). -3- A motion was passed to change the maximum number of terms a board member can . -- serve from two to three (Nevins /Matheson). A motion was passed to approve the Personnel Committee's recommendation regarding staff attendance at Pioneerland Board meetings. A copy of the policy is attached to the original minutes and will be added to the PLS Personnel Rules and Policies. A motion was passed that the matter of the Automation Project be brought off the table (Schulstad /Matheson). An explanation was given by B. Sundberg. Discussion and input followed. R. Emery recommended a committee be appointed and asked for volunteers. A motion was passed directing that this committee be formed (Kreie/ Brunner). A motion was passed for the renewal of the Automation Fund C.D. (57,937) at First I;ational of Glencoe (Jacobson /Bohm). A motion was passed to engage the firm of Westberg 5 Eischens to audit the 1990 PLS financial records (Chri:;tiansen /Dahlager). The full board will meet January 14 for the annual meeting. Mileage vouchers were completed and the meeting was adjourned at 9 :35 p.m. Lorna Carlson Secretary 0 Nt /D7ANNE 12/19/40 - 10:f2343 OI FUNL I Q • t • i� 1 Q •I I PIONE*Kt 4MO LIBRARY STSTLR LDOIIIY )4 Ll1,.5ULH I77U INTEGRATED FINANCIAL SYSTEM IFS161 PAGE 1 EXPENDITURE GUIDELINE AS OF 12/90 EVO: 12/19/90 9:15:46 PERCENT OF YEAR 1001 _.._ _CURREMT_-_ _ __ ACTUAL 1CTUAL __ _ 604T - ACT.__- 4UDGET THIS -MONTH YEAR -TD -DATE DIFFERENCE FCE • 100 PElSOMAL SERVICES 120,000.00 13,105.36 107,4E1.57 6105 SALARIES AND WAGES T9S,OOO.D0 66,902 92 612,75).72 6110_IIEf.l T3LI MSURAMLE ______. _ _ _. 21,000.00 1,773.99 20,963.64 6120 HEALTH INSURANCE - DEDUCTIBLE 3,600.00 26.60 3,730.15 6133 RETIREMENT INSURANCE 80,72,.00 6,728.08 /6,7d6.4s .t__.. )OTAL__.PERS0HAL _ SERVICES__ 900,314.00 77,430.79 914,255.96 6205 BOOKS - ADULT 120,000.00 13,105.36 107,4E1.57 ZE BOOKS - 36,000.00 1,642.36 36,656.53 ___ 6215 5 6E REFERENCE AEFf 26,000.00 3,652.52 21,526.60 6220 PERIODICALS 26050.00 683.60 31. +26.89 6225 PAMPHLETS 300.00 .00 13.36 6226 __OLSYIA. LIBRARY ATEIALS- ___.. 2,000.00 .00 .00 6230 CENSDN LINT MATERIALS 1.516.00 121.24 3,605.19 COUNTY 6235 LHIPPEVA COUNIY IIaR ARY MATERIALS 19.255.00 730.61 13,245.08 - -_6240 _. EIOEII_ItAI FRIARS ._ __ _ . _ 15,141.OV _ 1,641.91 11,107.39 M 6255 VIDE FILES 16A F 4,000.DD .00 1.400.00 6250 VIDED TAPES 5,000. DO 1.398.63 6,401.16 6260 6260 SLIDES A40 AND FILM STRIPS 550.00 .00 .00 6265 MICaFDRRS 300.00 295.00 1,199.95 6 210 ____.- _... 1.000.00 _. .00 555.21 • TO TAI M ATERIaIZ 241,932.00 25.961.06 245.205.19 • 1I0 UTALOG(NG 6310 OCLC AND OTHER CHARGES 16,608.00 .00 16,501.47 6120 _LO`LYEVJ D3_ CHARLES - _ _ _ 24,000.00 768.59 25,791.00 • TOTAL CATALOGING 40,609.00 766.59 42.595.47 • 630 VEHICLES 6350 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 14.600.00 2.145.54 15,406.02 ___6350_1NSUAANCE _. _ __ _ 3,415.00 .00 2.550.62 6373 AMORTIZATION 9,000.00 .00 .00 • TOTAL VEHICLES 26.015.00 2,145.54 17.954.64 • ND CJRMUNICAT ION 6430 -SF RM IN AL EJ E_ CHARLES_ 6420 TERMINAL MAINTENAN 6610 POSTAGE 4340 SHIPPING L- i071L_20NNUtlILAI204 /-- 130._RQUIPMEbi_ 6455 NEW EQUIPMENT 6460- A/Y_EQJIPMEYT_ 4470 MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS • TOTAL EQUIPMENT 9,000.00 _ __ _ . 1.009.63 10.765.42 1,000.00 .00 565.00 12,315.00 944.25 10,720.97 22.715.00 ___- ._.1.934.08 _. _.0 OSL79 • 160 OTHEA • 505_SUSIOa"A UPPLIES. A.ND_EOAIPAENI._ 6510 SJPPLIES AND PRIHIING L� 1315 ORONOT I ON AL AMD PAOGRAMA(N6 lS>n 31LE 4M0 IJLTIMII -TAE . 6525 MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES _q 6530 PROF. RE98EASAIPS (TRUSTEES) 6535 [9SJRANCE 6510 ADS 1ND LEGAL NOTICES 6545 AUDITING ..�� 6556 A E SCHOLARSHIP ' � R 6550 SCHOLA95 RSHI NIP FUMO __6560_EATE4SIJN CONTRACTS .cw • TOTAL OTHER -- -- - - ` -` 6613 GLEMCOE FRIENDS. 19d1 ` 6620. 6630 LOCAL EQUIP -.ENT 6650 STATE SALES TAI F' b "O FARILL1IESEU90 6670 LARGF PRINT FUND °. 6580 SURMEN READING " • _IDIAL- SPECIAL ,' . -J•--_ TOTAL LIBRARY a `1 Of fIMAL.. TOTALS_ 50 ACCOUNTS _ y BALANCE LEFT ON HAND 2.655.00 .00 1,000.00 96.42 15,000.00 1.791.35 16,655.00 1.893.77 1,500.00 645.36 27,493.00 1,656.67 1.000.00 .00 ..__ 6,000.00 ..1.445.50 5,000.00 591.86 400.00 497.91 11,500.00 .00 100.00 .00 1,500.00 .00 3.000.D0 225.00 $00.00 .00 I,DUO.DO .00 10.500.00 .00 68,494.00 5.064.30 1,390.00 2,717.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 .5,042.00.___ 1,999.00 7,C60.00 17,228.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 401.00 501.00 1,361,911.00 1.141,911.00 114,619.11 114.619.11 $136.564.95 1.664.06 507.15 Z5,300.10 27,531.31 5.741.99 z9, 665. 1.012.02 8.626.06 5.693.89 785.91 11.053.00 25.00 1.500.00 2.700.00 1,120.71 185.52 a, 520.00 91.947.36 .00 $0.00 S,312.S4 2,]44.6 3.643.76 ],217. 2v ], 14.431.02 1,177,061.66 1.157.063.86 6136.564.95 1S,TS5.]Z- 102 16.36 100 I)J.65- 104 1,935.55 96 13,931.96- 102 1 2,472.43 - - aD -- -��-- 2,651. >1- LOT LTz 9,216.69- 166 266.24 5 2.000.00 0 226.19- 114 5.009.92 74 1.133.61 86 2.200.00 AS 1.401.76- 126 1.061.22- 365 250.00 0 698.95- 400 551.79 45 '2.666.61 99 L95.47- 101 1.191.00- 107 1.966.47- LDS 806.02- 106 464.36 15 e, 000.4, o 6,054.]6 69 1.765.42- 620 433.00 S2 1.993.03 91 443.21 fi 970.94 63 02.85 51 10.340.10- 169 4.674.31- 648 4,24 -1.99- 383 2,190.38- 106 11.02- lot 2,626.06 -. 145 6 111 385.91- 196 446.00 96 77.00 21 .40 100 300.00 90 620.31- 220 615.48 If 5,680.00 36 1,453.48- 105 1,393.00 0 2.667.JD 2 3,312.54- 266 25L.64 87 1.398.22 71 218.29- 111 389.25- 119 1,786.98 90 15,092.86- 101 15,092.06- 101 Pn O� Mt /UTANNF lh4 /9l 9: 1 S: 09 Ol FUND ALANCE LEFT ON HAND J10 OLCEIPT 5101 RASIC SIAIF /FLOERAL 410 Silo -- RIG STnNF COUNTY 5 115 CHTVPLNA CluNfY 5I2U KAVJIfnHI CUUNTY 512-' LAC OUI P.RLF COUNTY 5125 VC LFUD CJUNTY 5110 4E ° 6FA COUNTY SLIJ -- R4VVILL• LOUNTY. _. 5 115 S 41FT CJUNTY SI37 YCLLOM MCUILINF CJUNTY - 5i4O A✓PLEION 5145 9ENSON 5140 FAIRFAX -3150_ SLENCJ F. 5155 GRACCVILLE 5157 G{A.41TE FALLS - - -. S11J - HUTLHINSDN 5161 KERKHJVLN 5 1 7 0 LITCHFILLU _. __5172- -OLTVTA 5175 nKTJNVILLC S19U NILLMAR OIAU 1S4AN0 5190 nAMSON 5195 HLCTOR - S2i0.-- MAOISU.V 5200 RLNViLLE 5410 CASH A'_CFI•TS F. SAL2S TAY __%.2a _.. GIF :5 S4)0 INTERLSI TOTAL RECEIPTS SCRIPTIUN__ _..__ _. _ _. _. .._.____ BUOGET [� 660 FINAL TOTALS 1, 390.OU 2, 71 7.0V 2.000.OJ 5,042.OU 1,999.00 2.000.00 2,000.00 17,2za oo 41 ACCOUNTS O iA TOTAL AND DALANCE ON NAND .OUNfY 14 DECEMBhF 1990 1v6163 OAS[ l AS OF 12190 FOO: I /Od /91 V:)0:5) L . -. - ACTUAL__ ._.___ -- ACTUAL THIS -MONTH YEAR -TO -GATE $245,245.90 $143,296.48 PERCENT OF YEAR IUD( AOGT-.. A! T DIFFERENCE PCT .00 190,469.00 5910 5970 i76-- GLENCOE FUND RCNL 10[.44•- i0LL1RNiNL t__Yl ""LAN, ._ 22.088- 97_.- a 5910 FAMILY TIES FUND CJ .00 5940 LARGE PRINT FUND .00 SD,455.OJ SOS " "S -IAx 12.237.01 .:`0 100 5960 SUMNER READING .00 100 9 TOTAL OTHER FUNDS O ' •• TOTAL LIBRARY [� 660 FINAL TOTALS 1, 390.OU 2, 71 7.0V 2.000.OJ 5,042.OU 1,999.00 2.000.00 2,000.00 17,2za oo 41 ACCOUNTS O iA TOTAL AND DALANCE ON NAND .OUNfY 14 DECEMBhF 1990 1v6163 OAS[ l AS OF 12190 FOO: I /Od /91 V:)0:5) L . -. - ACTUAL__ ._.___ -- ACTUAL THIS -MONTH YEAR -TO -GATE $245,245.90 $143,296.48 PERCENT OF YEAR IUD( AOGT-.. A! T DIFFERENCE PCT .00 190,469.00 59. 469. J0- Ltd _ .00 ._ 22.088- 97_.- _.__ -- _..03___100- .00 74,322.01 .u0 LOU .00 110,754.1U 1,700.•0 98 .00 SD,455.OJ - - - - - -- - - .o0 l0U .00 12.237.01 .:`0 100 .00 68,264.00 .00 100 _- -00 .__. 29,142.00_____.. - 24,194- 00____S1- .00 14, .d0 LOJ .00 25,1U4.OU 9,601.Y0 72 .00 ... 9,3U5.00 - -__. __.... -.(0 ._..10U .00 IH.609.00 .1.0 100 .UO 4,427.00 4.417.00- 0 26, 425.00 -.-C 0__10 .UO 1,875.00 .LO too .00 21,195.00 .00 100 .00 _. - -_ S7.6Y6.O0 -.___ .. . ._._._ -CO -_ -_100_ .00 1,948.00 .CU IOU .00 41,852.00 .b " 100 -00 -- 19,9t2.00.___ - -_, .- [9___10x_ .00 12,764.00 .0 100 .00 92,050.00 .:0 too UO ._. .. 8 .00 12,642.00 .':o loo .00 7,747.00 .r3 100 1 4,365 -)0. ')._ .nn .UO 9,961.00 .00 a00 ' 4.117.01 48,175.76 104 .UO 4.289.OU _. _.__ _.. S, LB9.e0- __4 29- 726.78 7,177.17 322.x) 96 5,043.79 1.283.058.40 31,234.':)- 102 PIUVCFKLAVO LTDPARY SYSTEM INILGRAIEU FINANCIAL SYSTEM REVENUE GUIDELINE U7U RLIMnUSLMLNTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) - .OJ - 1, 390.CJ U - .00 --- SS)1 -R4 WRJ R.EMFNTS C41PPEQA COUNTY _. __ _._42,028- OQ 7) .00 .00 5825 REIMAURSFMENTS - JLIVIA (MATERIALS ONLY) 2,000.OU .00 2.000.00 5, U42.UJ 5430 REIMRURSEMFNTS - BFNSUN (MATERIALS ONLY) 1,576.00 .00 1,500.00 76.00 RFIN0. -�. CMIPOkNA COUNTY (NAET:RIALS ONLY)_ .GO C,OOO.Uo 0 25S -AO 5U50 REIMS - MJNTEVIJFJ (MATERIALS OILY) /S.lul.OU .00 11,505.00 1.596.30 TOTAL REINRUSEMENIS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) 69,960.00 .00 57.033.00 12,927. • 03U OTVLR RLIMBURS °MFNTS -Sd7Y O1MF4 R4IMRURS --2 ,02 -P ) i 5 • TOTAL OTHER REINRURSEMENTS 2.956.00 894.37 6,660.93 3.70Z.`3- 225 .00 - .OJ - 1, 390.CJ U - .00 1,980.00 717.00 7) .00 .00 2, Do).C. ) U - .VO .00 5, U42.UJ U .UO .DO 1,99Y.J) U .UO .GO C,OOO.Uo 0 .00 7,6UO.OU 400.00 71 .00 3,580.00 13.6".0) 21 5,918.16 1,150.112.3) 8,162.11- 101 1.341.970.00 5.918.16 1.150,132.13 8.361.11- lot $151,184.06 $1,493,628.81 1,341.970.00 131 ,000.00 21,oU9.0U - 74,)2'.OJ 112,454. 10 30,455.OJ .. 7.',237.OU 64,2u4.00 . a5,1A4.0U - 34, 560.OU 34, 511.OU . 9,305.OJ 10,609.00 .OU -46,&d5.00 -- 1,415.OU 21, 395. no i7,6Y6.00 - -- 1,9dR.0U 41. A52.OU 19,927.00 - 12, v2.060.OU O,OS4.OJ.. 12.642.00 7, 747.90 9, 901.DO 46, SU 9. 00 .. I,DUO.oU 7,SOO.UU 1.251,824.00 100 95 76 OZ Hutchinson Safety Council FO YOUR INrrOR&IATI,, ^1 Minutes . The Hutchinson safety Council met Novembet 26, 1990 at 12:00 noon at the Heitage Center. There were 11 members present. The minutes were approved as mailed. Old Business 1. Nominations and Election of Officers was held. Pre.cidrnfc Joyce Rex nominated George Field for President there being no other nominations, Marlin Torgerson moved to close the nominations with the Secretary casting a unanimous ballot. Vic - President: George Field nominated Jim Haasl as Vice - President. Dick Higgins moved to close the nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Jim Haasl. Secretary /Treasurer Joyce Rix nominated Jean Ward for Secretary /Treasurer. Marlin Torgerson moved to close the nominations and cast a unanimous ballot for Jean Ward. 2. Skateboards and Rollerblad Safety Safety literature received from the Minnesota Safety Council was given to Randy Exstad to distribute at school. If Safety Council members wish to order any safety information directly from the Consumer Product Safety Commission the number is 1 -800- 638 -8326. 3. Road Construction is now completed. Sew Business John Rodeberg stated that a speed study is being conducted by the State regarding the area of Jefferson - Oakland and Fair Avenue - Highw;;y 15 S. It was also mentioned that the speed limit sign on Highway 15 N. needs additional work. The 4 way �, p installed at 2nd Avenue and Adams Street has been very effective u:. has received many positive comments. • The December meeting has been canc- The next meeting will by January 28, 1991. Jim Haasl will be presenting the program an the new "Headlight Law" which was effective as of August 1990. There being no further Business, the meeting was adjourned. Submitted by: Jean Ward, Secretary /treasurer. uci %y U',.i1� -.,t"I MINUTES HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT . OFFICER'S MEETING Monday, January 14, 1991 Gary reported that the SCBA's should be handled carefully and any problems should be reported promptly. Jim reported truck committee is working hard, details will be coming. Jeff reported he is taking the ladder out of 235, it will remain in the station. Respectfully submitted by, Bob Schantzen Secretary 1 HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES REGULAR MEETING Monday, December 3, 1990 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. The minutes of Novbemer meeting were read and approved. Election of officers for the fire department were held and elected as follows: Chief Ist Asst Chief 2nd Asst. Chief City Capt. Ladder Capt. Rural Capt. Rescue Capt. City Lt Ladder Lt. Rural Lt. Rescue Lt. Secretary Treasurer Brad Emans Randy Redman Steve Schramm Jim Popp Gary Forcier Craig Reiner John Reynolds Bob Vleyra Joe Drahos Tom Pessek Jeff Dobratz Bob Schantzen Gary Henke Randy reported on the dance It will be January 19, 1991, at Lake Marion Ballroom. Jim Popp reported on Rural pumper committee. Gary Henke and Steve Schramm will work with Ken Merrill on getting a new copy machine. 0 0 The Bills and Runs were read and approved as follows: F-UM CITY Sid's Foods 2.83 Hutch Sports 9.15 Clarey's 25.90 Steve Schramm 7.18 Allen Office 9.65 Brinkman 13.28 Coast to Coast 3.03 Allen Office 4.50 Christensen Repair 1.00 7 West Stop 22.26 Heger Jewelry 27.00 Coast to Coast 10.68 Coast to Coast 2.07 Coast. to Coast 2.69 Clarey's 108.00 Randy Redman 443.49 Steve Schramm 337.76 Brad Emans 432.40 L &P Supply .55 Allen Office 3.69 Electro Watchman 144.00 Coast to Coast 5.40 Coast to Coast 2.30 Coast. to Coast 1.49 Fitzloff 3.99 Fitzloff 56.25 TwowayComm 189.70 Brinkman 19.92 Ink Spots 45.37 Hutch Iron 7.75 Hutch Wholesale 4.25 Hutch Wholesale 102.64 Hutch Wholesale 6.45 Fire Engineering 21.95 Phillips 66 30,54. Zee Medical 159.95 Tom Thumb 28.70 Hutch Fire & Safe 8.40 Hutch Fire & Safe 4.50 Hutch Fire & Safe 62.80 Two Way Comm 30.00 Reinetz 413.35 rw. i r)...4 . 7 nn r L. I- L-1 Big Beer 5.37 L &P Supply 52.95 Forbes Auto 19.47 TOTAL $ 2897.60 RURAL Brad Emans 11.75 Steve Schramm 8.50 Randy Redman 92.50 Jim Brodd 2175 John Reynolds 16.00 Bruce Precht 16.50 Ed Homan 15.75 Orlin Henke 7.25 Hutch Wholesale 21.13 Hutch Wholesale .98 Hutch Wholesale ( 6.61) Tom Pessek 73.80 L &P Supply 4.30 • Zee Medical 371.00 TOTAL $716.69 GENERAL US Postmaster 25.00 Pizza Hut 48.72 South Haven FD 8.00 Oary Henke 200.00 Sid's Foods 4.14 Coast to Coast 4.33 coast to Coast 20.41 Hutch Wholesale 30.00 Rexall Drug 1.35 Browns Floral 35.00 KDUZ 192.75 Hutch Leader 335.40 Bill Arndt 332.00 Simonson 50.58 Ink Spots 149.35 George Field 9.54 Northland Bev 25.50 • Ink Spots 701.20 Hager Jewelry 34.92 Hutch Tele Co 363.75 KKJR 192.75 TOTAL 3,655.79 .. 1 1 -2 Schrupp 11-16 Learning Hutch 1 1 -3 Buss 11-19 PD Standby 11-3 PD Complaint 11-19 Hwy 7 W 11-3 Albrecht 11-20 3M 11-4 3M 11-20 Nghia 11 -6 J's Pizza I1 -23 3M 11-8 Happy Chef 11-24 Cty 14 11-10 Massmann 11-25 Hwy 7 W 11 -10 Plowman 11 -26 Ashwill I1-11 Jackson I1 -28 3M 11-13 Magdanz New applicants were read Kelly Goranson and Casey Stotts. The meeting was adjourned. Subm i tted by Jamie Emans Secretary 0 0 0 • � Ct u . 1��7 MINUTES ` MCLEOD REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY JANUARY 17, 1991 Members Present Others Present p 1n� i�Ir'� Sheldon Nies, Chairman Robin Schoen, Leader FOR YOUR :il O ,A T i` �j Tow Daggett Barry Anderson, Attorney Larry Graf Elli Mills, Dakota Rail Dean Oleson Kimberly Hughes, Dakota Rail Milo Kubasch Jack McManus, Dakota Rail Joe Gehlen Members Absent Les Forman Chairman Sheldon Nies opened the meeting at 11:30 a.m. at the Victorian Inn, Hutchinson. Jack McManus, the newly named general manager of Dakota Rail, was introduced. Elli Hills provided an update on rail activities. Pic Industries, Silver lake (50 cars shipped). They constructed a temporary shed which inadvertently infringed 20 feet on the required setback. The county has granted permission to allow it to remain in place until spring, when it will be moved to comply with county zoning. er is Dakota Rail has given a caboose car to the City of Hutchinson. The car' is to be repainted and a new logo placed on it. A rail trestle is also being given to the city, subject to an agreement being drawn up by Attorney Anderson. Rail operations since March 15, 1990, at which time the present management took over the railroad, have shown 562 cars loaded, a 26% increase over the similar period a year ago. Total cars for the year in 1989 were 619; in 1990, 710. The 3 top customers in 1990 were 3M C.o., Butler Manufacturing, and Pic Industries. Hutch Scrap Metal, Pure Culture Products, and Norwesco are among other large u =ers. Farmers Elevator in Hutchinson has done a little shipping. There has been no employee turnover with the exception of Michael Ross. Two new employees have been added, for a total of 7. Rail rehab was begun at the end of September and continued until the end of December. 3500 ties were added, plus 2500 feet of rail and b carloads of ballast. In 1991 there will be 17,500 feet of (90 pound) rail, 9000 ties and 240 carloads of ballast. The whole line will be surfaced and some bridge work done. Work should be complete in November 1991 to Class 1 specifications over the entire line. The dinner train is being marketed for sale. Real estate is being sold as appropriate and new leases worked out. All the bankruptcy debts are paid, with the exception of $46,000 still owed to 3M and Butler. Property was sold to the Lafeyette Country Club for $312,000. Sale is being negotiated of Mound properties to the City of Mount; however, some of this property is held in a mortgage by the State and the sale will be held up while MN /DOT and the Attorney General review its status. When this sale can be completed, the final amount owed to 3M and Butler will be paid. Property negotiations in Minnetonka Beach and St. Bonifacius are difficult. Hutchinson property is leased at S.10 /sq.ft. per year, with varying rates in other locations. New rail traffic is being sought, with a possible increase from 3M Co., Norwesco and others. A seminar will be presented on bringing in lumber which may be of interest to some potential shippers. The owners feel this has been a good 3/4 year. At the completion of the report, the meeting was adjourned at 12:45 p.m. Recorded by Hazel Sitz is