The URL can be used to link to this page

cp03-10-1992 c1 U TCH l I SOi 1 CITY CA LEND;�iR . WEEK OF March 8 T 0 March 14 1992 VjEDCdESDAY -11- 10:00 A.M. - Directors Meetii at City Hall Juil;t�r:1 -8- -9- 5:00 P.M. - Joint Meeting of City Council & Directors for Annual Reports 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting) at City Hall THURSDAY -12- 9:30 A.M. - Senior Advisory Board Meeting at Senior Center FRIDAY -13- SATURDAY -14- �. • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1992 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Timothy Caspers, Shalom Baptist Church 3. Consideration of Minutes Regular Meeting of February 25, 1992 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Building Official's Report - February 1992 2. Planning Commission Minutes of February 18, 1992 3. Hospital /Nursing Home Board Minutes of January 2, 1992 and January 21, 1992 • Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. (a) Intoxicating Liquor License - Hutch Pizza Inc. /J's Sports Bar, Steve Picha Owner Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue license (b) Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution 6. Communications. Requests And Petitions (a) Consideration of Request for Use of Library Square By Girl Scouts On March 12, 1992 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (b) Consideration of Communication from The Underground Bar & Grill Regarding Refuse Collection • Action - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 10, 1992 • (a) Resolution No. 9645 - Resolution To Rename West River Park To Masonic /West River Park Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (b) Resolution No. 9670 - Resolution For Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (c) Resolution No. 9678 - Resolution For Release And Substitution Of Pledged Securities At First State Federal Savings & Loan Association, Hutchinson, MN Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (d) Ordinance No. 92 -55 - An Ordinance Extending The Corporate Limits Of The City Of Hutchinson To Include Certain Unincorporated Land Totally Surrounded By The City Of Hutchinson (Fair Grounds Property) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first reading and set second reading for March 24, 1992 8. Unfinished Business (a) Hutch, Inc. - Country Club Terrace Mobile Home Park 1. Temporary Evacuation Plan 2. Plans And Specifications for Permanent Storm Shelter 3. Construction Schedule for Shelter Action - (b) Consideration of Proposal from Inspec, Inc. for Tennis Court Rehabilitation with Hutchinson Public Schools (DEFERRED FEBRUARY 25, 1992) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement • E • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 10, 1992 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Exercising All Remaining Options for Phase II Downtown Redevelopment Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (b) Consideration of Sale of Used Dasher Boards from Civic Arena Action - Motion to reject (c) Consideration of Authoriz Remaining Parcel On Phase Action - Motion to reject (d) Consideration of Adopting Budget - Motion to approve ing Condemnation for Any II Downtown Redevelopment - Motion to approve 1992 Rural Fire Department Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9671 • (e) Discussion of Use of Tax Increment At Farmers Elevator In Industrial Park Action - (f) Consideration of Awarding Bid for 1992 Spring Tree Planting Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award contract (g) Consideration of Settlement with Insurance Company Regarding Junker Litigation Action - (h) Discussion of Setting Public Hearing Date Regarding Crow River Dam Operation And Maintenance Action - (i) Discussion of Proposed 1992 Airport Improvements Action - • 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 10, 1992 0 (j) Discussion of Assessment to Properties Along Downtown Alley Improvements Action - (k) Consideration of Receiving Report And Calling Hearing On Improvement for Letting No. 2, Project No. 92 -09 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and accept report and set hearing for March 24, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9672 & No. 9673 (1) Consideration of Receiving Report And Calling Hearing On Improvement for Letting No. 4, Project No. 92 -07 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and accept report and set hearing for March 24, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9674 & No. 9675 (m) Consideration of Receiving Report And Calling Hearing On Improvement for Letting No. 6, Project No. 92 -10 • Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and accept report and set hearing for March 24, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9676 & No. 9677 (n) Consideration of Recommendation from Refuse Contract Committee That Commercial /Industrial Entities Obtain Refuse Service from Private Sector At Earliest Date Established By City Attorney /State Law Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (o) Consideration of Setting Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of Resolution Calling for An Organized Refuse Collection System Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and set hearing for March 24, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. (p) Review of 1992 Budget Shortfall Action - C 1 J 4 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 10, 1992 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Adiournment • is 5 • • Itr - .. 0 -404 US MPARI MENT as COV'dEAC to •� sueAUw+r uvs. REPORT OF BUILDING OR ZONING PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION mark X! e pngpaf b t o. bs elo na u cnaagai. I pproprub oR below and uplairt in Domnnanb, ❑ Difcom,nued i,smrg permits .� hte13ed win ana:ner evltam ❑ Spm Into two w moro sy,tatrn ❑ Anns,ed land areas ❑ Had other chwga, H m panrvb we bwM d,urp , J a I.A au 1, n... .iu I - IU 4: A1 r"1a AL d4P Period In wh4h par,nha issued ' FEiRUATT 1792 IRlease cmecr arsY man n r,eers aM ,eonIs nakd.g 2v C, 553 J574 )J 27 4 9199 C63 1 7 'T 91;1 )273) J1r._S 1A2AA BLJ; IFFICISL FIR CITY OF HUTC41INi0.9 CITY HALL 37 WASHINGTON AVE,WEST HUTCHINSON NN 55350 PLEASE COMPLETE AND MAIL THIS FORM ON OR BEFORE .,r. RAR ♦a 1992 .a ye,m, muR IAI in iM pOI -i U "nfum this form 1201 Eae110th glasses tuilNr NHRamm. Call CObM J41"Ins nWh, IN 471324MI (3011 763 -7244. NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED HOUSEKEEPING Nunbe of Nu "�' ot BUILDING S No YaWtiOn of Valuation, of BuWwig, Housing c0natructwn Om O Iluildmpe Housing construction el cents Ibl Icl Ids urWa 0. asnb lei III 1 S-910 sanely h detached ched F,ch gs m08iN harms. honne 101 rgle family houses. attached - Sepa'arM Dy pvour d fo roof waft, -N0 units above or below, and - .9epMafe hswmg eysbpT NId UrMTy harm ICoum each unit n a Nparate Dull - I 102 Two fanny Wiyng9 103 Threw and four lamiy buAdings 104 1 Fivabr a family buildings 105 TOTAL -2umof fO7 -1Og- log IAA Arm NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED P"LICLY OWNED NONHOUS E EE PING BUILDINGS Item Number of vebarvl 01 Hooper of No. V,luatgn of Bwb,g, Room, coat lmn Onus ca.tb &uldirgs' cmatruchm Rooms Orrvr cmu lei Ibl IU sal is Ifs Igl Hptete. motaN, and tourist Cabins (atomism accomrrodatwro orgy] 213 011ie ncnhaumk"p n shshar 214 NEW IDENTIAL NONRES PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLYOWNED BUILDINGS INan N o b ValuaUOn of NvmDer Valwtron of lAnatncuon of Cmsnuclon buildn21 Orvt ano bull np Orrat cam, Amuwnrnt. , ocul.�Wredertional Isl ]11 Ikl Icl of bl ClturcMe m,d othv rsli sous 719 wwuml 320 Pah' are Ibuid , aM opn deckadl 321 Sarvlu stations and npah gar 377 Hosmab and in,x diorW 32 OHKN. banks. and pofnswe 324 Public works and utilities 325 Schools an, odor aducn 326 tOrN and cuetonw ssr 327 DIM! nonrsademiY building, 322 Stn nc nsl O1 then tIlkling, 321 ADDITION(, ALTERATIONS, AND PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OW NEO CONVERSIONS hem No Nuunben VNuabon 01 Number Vafua m of of consuunwn bui ldrga Dim tenor oI p s cents Wising. Omit cents lei Ibl cl Ids is) Residennal - Classify add,,,,, of serapes" carports in item 432. 434 Nwuesidintial" nmh solieapig 437 Additive of rnidemiN gore", and ca ( anached and detacli dl - - .Lml F.Mti; 1 _ 436 1 B 100 TOW YUuatlon $3,119,862 • \J • DEMOLITIONS AND ►IIIVATELY OWNED ►UI ICLY OWNED RAZING OF n shrnEpr d NwMer M DUILOINGS 7- No. aulWpgs Euil6npa Mwe+q uMlf lea Ihl Ic1 Id) IP uch@d ma datacnaal Ea Two -tam,v hmmlr.gs E Iq Iat All DIN, a.. _ras @nd aVUM"s 64 INDIVIDUAL PERMITS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION VALUED AT ISOO.ODOOR MORE Pieria pour]@ the following info notion 1d each perma aun ont@pcpnatructw v&AAd a t 1500.000 or more emnad n,*clam I through IV. Item Nbn Gt u ' No Iran Dewmotwn Norms and address of Own e $h., wal' al VaWwlon sec. o rw or Eugdu Mrt 1X1 a as tio omn Cents M OV'a' ^ p bildnpa I —IV w1! urns lal 1@I Icl Idi lea 111 1g) RnpMAAdrnp _ S .tars__________________________ Sbap1:G_ ,Q'hion Smedemas DO_P_I19rip0lar__________ ___ ___ ❑hne 125 Rain St. Ib. G reen 1 KM or bo ____________ _______ ----------- ------------------------ ❑hlrna _________ Sna Wdreta ❑Nd4 KM M yYyrp ___ ________ ________ ❑hnab Sna sd@na 1 Kw of gddanp ____ _______________________________ ❑bran 9ta addreu a Kira 0 htldrq S atldW _ ------ ----------------- _____ ❑ ham 1 KNOT p�IMp _ __________________ _________________________ _____ _____ '�hnm ___ Sna adarau ' f K" of hurdrq Site addma s Kp! a hrlday ______ _________________________ M o1 lKddrnp ---------------------------- ---- - - - - -- ❑hbm ------- - - - - -- ---------------- Sne adbau f Comments An TOu ewue of any raw PW MH O jurisdictions? ONO E3 Y" — Pipes@ give add~&F infwmrnon in COmmpnfs. Noma of person to contact regard irrg thn report Telephone TitM era raM Numper Enenaion rdrea l., it 587 -5151 210 • \J • • MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, February 18, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7x30 p.m. with the following members present: ElRoy Dobratz, Dean Wood, Clint Gruett, Roland Ebent, Tom Lyke, Craig Lenz and Chairman Bill Craig. Also Presents Gary Plotz, City Administrator. 2. MINUTES Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, January 21, 1992. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR MINI- STORAGE City Administrator Gary Plotz stated he had received a request in writing from Mr. Condon to postpone this item • until March. (b) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENT REQUESTED BY RICHARD SMITH IN STONEY POINT 3RD ADDITION Mr. Plotz explained Mr. Smith would like to continue this request to the April meeting. (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RICHARD SMITH ON ROBERTS RD Continued to April. (d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR CLASSROOM ADDITIONS AT THE MIDDLE SCHOOL Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:40 p.m. with the reading of publication 84340 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, February 6, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request for conditional use permit by the Hutchinson School District to construct additional classrooms located at the Middle School on South Grade Rd. Supt. Glenn Matejka explained the increase enrollment in the school district and presented a proposal for 4 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1992 classrooms this year and 7 classrooms within the next two • years. He stated this construction would be on the south wing of the building. This would allow for the sixth grade to come into the Middle School. He commented that the same architect would be designing the addition as designed the building. City Administrator Plotz explained the reasons for requiring a conditional use permit and that the staff recommends approval of the it rooms. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 7,43 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the request. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION TO BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY THE MCLEOD COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION ON HWY 22 SOUTH City Administrator Gary Plotz stated the map includes only fair grounds property and not city property. • Mr. Tim Ulrich, Fair board, commented on the township membership on the fair board. There was discussion of the township reaction. He stated the area is 135 acres and the fair board has signed easements with the county for roadway through the property. Mr. Ulrich stated the fair grounds would be approximately 50 acres. There was discussion on the airport property and tax exemption of the property. Services to the fair grounds will be at the fair board's expense. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend that City Council begin annexation proceeding on the property, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONTINUATION OF REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT BY BUD MAYNARD ON HWY 15 NORTH City Attorney Plotz stated that staff is comfortable with the request as long as the stipulations are met. Mr. Tim Ulrich, Citizens Bank, stated the sanitary sewer has been 2 0 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • FEBRUARY 18, 1992 addressed and explained the use of the property on the north as storage. Discussion followed the easements and 8' overhead electric. Mr. Ebent moved to recommend approval of the lot split provided the staff criteria are met of 2 -5 -92. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (c) REVIEW OF PROPOSED TAR INCREMENT DISTRICT FOR PHASE II DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT City Administrator Plotz explained the district and boundaries. The 25 year district called a redevelopment district and the public hearing will be held on March lo, 1992. He explained the city is also acquiring a portion of Block 48. Mr. Wood made a motion to approve the concept of the tax increment district to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. (d) ELECTION OF OFFICERS • Mr. Ebent moved to nominate Mr. Gruett as chairman and Mr. Dobratz moved to nominate Mr. Wood as vice chairman. Mr. Lyke moved nominations cease seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. 5. OLD BUSINESS (a) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF 1) Discussion of Kevin Compton sketch plan - Mr. Plotz explained the time line of the platting procedure. He stated the staff was concerned with snow removal and the width of the lots at the cul -de -sac. He stated the request will be for five lots to be split. There was discussion on the protective covenants to be placed on file. Mr. Don Erickson explained the covenants and the protection of covenants. 2) Discussion on sketch plan presented by Mr. Dan Huebert - City Administrator Plotz presented the sketch plan. Mr. Huebert commented on the concerns of storm sewer and ponding possibility. He explained the sketch plan and the development • possibilities. The development is approximately 5 3 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 18, 1992 • acres and is proposed to be a twin home and town house development. He explained the need for off - street parking. Mr. Plotz explained the procedure of a Planned Unit Development PUD application. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. • • 4 HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/ BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME - - -- SPECIAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - January 2, 1992 Conference Room E - 4:45 p.m. Present: Rich Myers, Vice President; Elaine Black, Trustee; Rev. Thor Skeis, Trustee; Roger Gilmer, Truster, Mike Carls, Trustee; Marlin Torgerson, Trustee; Dr. John Zenk, Chief of Medical Staff Absent: Dori Johnson, President; Jim Mills, Secretary Others Present: Philip G. Graves, CEO; Robert Eoepcke, BMNH Administrator; Pam Larson, Controller; Jeff Holmquist, Hutchinson Leader; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary The meeting was called to order by Vice President Myers at 4:45 p.m. Minutes of the budget committee meeting of December 31 were read. The recommendation from the committee was to take a 151 price increase across the board for fiscal year 1992. Graves explained that budget figures weren't firm yet, but revenue is expected to be $20,331,547, and discounts and uncollectibles are expected to be $5 million. Other revenues are expected to be $112,150, leaving net revenue at $15 million. Budget figures show expected total operating expenses of $16,592,235; however, Graves • explained that he has directed managers to cut their operating budgets so that total will change. This gives the hospital operating income of ($1,148,538) before taking a price increase. In order to meet debt service requirements, Graves explained that we must have a $500,000 bottom line, so we need $1.5 million in income. Myers acknowledged that this looks high; however, the committee consensus was to fake a balanced approach: derive one -half that amount from an increase in charges to the consumer, and one -half in budget cuts. Zenk noted that - five doctors will be added to the medical staff within the next year: 0 One internist will be added to the Hutchinson Medical Center (HMC) by the and of first quarter; o Two family practitioners will be joining the HMC in June; 0 one psychiatrist is being recruited for the Hospital; and o One OB /GYN is being recruited by the HMC. Admission statistics for 1992 showed 1934 patients were admitted, compared to 1941 in 1990. Census days increased because length of stay increased. Graves relayed that Dr. Zenk is working to educate the doctors in resource consumption and managing length of stay as beat they can. The board members acknowledged that the doctors' first concern is ensuring that the patient is treated properly before discharge; however, the doctors recognize the need for reduced resource consumption and management of the length of stay. Question was asked regarding Medicare supplemental insurance. Graves stated there's much confusion in the general public about why supplemental insurance doesn't cover the entire hospital bill. He explained that private insurance for Medicare patients pays only the cost Medicare doesn't, i.e., the deductibles and co- payments. Since the law requires the Hospital to accept payment in full from Medicare, the Hospital • can't charge the patient for costs in excess of what Medicare will pay. In fact, if the patient was readmitted within 72 hours, the first DRG payment would be all that f the Hospital could recover. 4 (3) Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 1/2/92 • page Two The board agreed that this is a problem facing the entire nation, and the general population has little knowledge of the problem. It would be easier to deal with the patient if they were made aware of it. Suggestion was made to develop a brochure as part of the package given to incoming patients to help inform the public about Medicare reimbursement. Following discussions Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by zenk, to approve a 15% price increase effective January 1, 1992. All were in favor. Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:12 p.m. Res ctfully submitted, Lau ie Hulkonen James F. Mille Recording Secretary Secretary LH • C • HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/ BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME ANNUAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - January 21, 1992 Conference Room A/B - 5:30 p.m. Present: Dori Johnson, President; Jim Mills, Secretary; Marlin Torgerson, Trustee; Roger Gilmer, Trustee; Elaine Black, Trustee; Rev. Thor Skeie, Trustee; Mike Carls, Trustee; John Zenk, MD, Chief of Medical Staff Absent: Rich Myers, Vice President (excused) Others Present: Philip G. Graves, CEO; Robert Koepcke, BMNH Administrator; Karen Malmsten, Director of Finance; Pam Larson, Controller; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Robyn Erickson, Director of Marketing; Gib Lehman, Director of Plant Operations; Peter Worthington, M.A. Mortenson Co.; Jeff Holmquist, Hutchinson Leader; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary Peter Worthington presented his monthly construction progress report. Considerable discussion was held regarding the cost issues presented for approval. Worthington noted that total project savings had changed only minimally. He estimated they will return roughly 5.5 million to the Hospital from the construction contingency fund. Johnson thanked Worthington for his report, and he and Lehman left the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by President Johnson. Minutes of Past Meetings Minutes of the December 17, 1992, regular board of directors meeting were presented. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to accept the minutes as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes Dr. Zenk was welcomed to the board, and he then presented the minutes of the January meeting. The physicians had discussed the top 20 DRGS and found HCH ranks the same as state peer group hospitals, telling us we're seeing the same kind of patients as other hospitals are. We also learned HCH charges exceed what the DRG pays, 95 out of 100 times. The question of whether chiropractors should be able to order CTs and MRIs will be decided at the next meeting. Possible revenues to come to the hospital if this were allowed were discussed. The liability related to allowing non - physicians to order these tests will lie primarily with the radiologists, who must ensure they relay the information needed to the chiropractor and provide documentation of same. Question was asked as to medical staff attendance at these meetings. Zenk relayed that physicians are required to attend 50% of the meetings; ordinarily, 60 -70% of the medical staff attend. Graves complimented Zenk on his DRG presentation to the medical staff and told the board of compliments received from consulting physicians regarding the _ presentation. 7, A.�3� A. Election of Officers Considerable discussion was held regarding length of terms for current trustees. Following discussion, President Johnson appointed Mills, Torgerson and Carlo to a committee to select and present a slate of candidates for board office at the next meeting. B. Reappointments to Medical Staff Recommendation was received from the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff to promote three practitioners from provisional staff to the staff originally requested, and to reappoint five members of the allied health staff. Following discussion: Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Torgerson, to promote the following practitioners from provisional staff to the staff requested in their original applications: Boris Velkov, MD - Active Staff; Ms. Nancy Ortlip - Allied Health Staff; Richard Cervenka, DPM - Courtesy Podiatric Staff; and to reappoint the following practitioners to the allied health staff with privileges as outlined on their reapplication forms: Bradley Culver, CRNA; Jay Loeppke, CRNA; Eugene Whitbeck, Physician's Assistant; • Connie Sterner, Physician's Assistant; and Jeffrey Aleckson, Social Services. All were in favor. Motion carried. Annual Board of Directors' Meeting - 1/21/92 • Page Two Old Business 1. Proiect Update The update was presented earlier in the meeting. Following discussions Motion was made by Mills, seconded by Carlo, to approve the cost issues as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. 2. 1992 Budaet The 1992 preliminary budget and commentary were presented and discussed. Total patient days are projected to increase by 677 days to 10,809. The average length of stay is expected to hold at 4.4 days and outpatient areas are expected to continue the trend of consistent and considerable growth. Other areas projected to see increased business include OR, ER and outpatient services. Total increase in patient revenue is projected to be $3.6 million. Allowances and uncollectibles are budgeted to be $4,925,000 in 1992, basically because fixed payor contract business (60%) means any price increases will not be reflected in case collection. FTEs were discussed. Graves noted these are up by 10 from the 1991 budget but reduced from what had been requested in the 1992 budget. Salaries were also discussed. Step and merit pay systems were explained. It is expected that RN contracts will be going up 4.6% in June. Question was asked if we are able to pay that. Graves stated we will revisit Equipment Depreciation to see if some of those dollars can be moved to Salaries without adversely impacting the bottom line. No recommendation C for salary increases was presented at the meeting due to the need for • further study. New Business A. Election of Officers Considerable discussion was held regarding length of terms for current trustees. Following discussion, President Johnson appointed Mills, Torgerson and Carlo to a committee to select and present a slate of candidates for board office at the next meeting. B. Reappointments to Medical Staff Recommendation was received from the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff to promote three practitioners from provisional staff to the staff originally requested, and to reappoint five members of the allied health staff. Following discussion: Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Torgerson, to promote the following practitioners from provisional staff to the staff requested in their original applications: Boris Velkov, MD - Active Staff; Ms. Nancy Ortlip - Allied Health Staff; Richard Cervenka, DPM - Courtesy Podiatric Staff; and to reappoint the following practitioners to the allied health staff with privileges as outlined on their reapplication forms: Bradley Culver, CRNA; Jay Loeppke, CRNA; Eugene Whitbeck, Physician's Assistant; • Connie Sterner, Physician's Assistant; and Jeffrey Aleckson, Social Services. All were in favor. Motion carried. 16 Annual Board of Directors' Meeting - 1/21/92 Page Three Fourth Quarter 1991 Institutional Objective Status Report The report was presented, and progress toward achievement of the 1991 institutional objectives was discussed. Following discussion: Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Mills, to approve the fourth quarter 1991 institutional objective status report as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. D. 1992 Goals Governing board goals, derived from the recent trustee self - evaluation surveys, were presented by Erickson. Request was made to amend Goal 14 to read "one" month rather than three months, and to add a seventh goal regarding inviting the HCH Foundation and BMNH Memorial Board members to a future board meeting. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Torgerson, to adopt the 1992 board of directors' goals as amended. All were in favor. Motion carried. E. CEO Evaluation President Johnson appointed Myers and Gilmer to work with Gordon Sprenger, LifeSpan CEO, in completing an evaluation of Graves. F. LifeSpan Report The announcement made the previous week about the signing of a letter of intent to merge Health One and LifeSpan was briefly discussed. G. Burns Manor Report Roepcke presented statistics and information on Burns Manor activities. The question of continuing BMNH's relationship with Good Neighbor was discussed. Suggestion was also made to hold the March, 1992, board meeting at Burns Manor, and reminder was given that orientation to BMNH remains to be presented to the (former hospital) board members. A request was also received from Dr. Zenk for a chart cart for the nursing home, to hold the basics for administering physical exams. H. other A. Automatic Doors for West Entrance Torgerson relayed a suggestion that automatic doors replace the regular doors currently in place at the Rehab entrance to the lower level of the Hospital. Graves relayed there is a plan to replace the inside set of doors with power doors; apparent problems with snow build -up on the door sensors make it preferable not to have them replace the outer doors. Comment was also made that the handicapped sloped approach becomes icy on weekends, at times. This will be addressed by the Safety Committee. B. McLeod County MH Contracts Community Support Program and outpatient Chemical Dependency service contracts from McLeod County were presented and discussed. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Torgerson, to approve the contracts as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. r xl Annual Board of Directors' Meeting - 1/21/92 • Page Four 1 C. Auxiliary Gift to Ambulance Department The BCH Auxiliary's recent decision to purchase a cellular phone for use in the hospital ambulances was announced. Appreciation was expressed by Graves for the generous gift, and a thank -you letter will be sent to the group. D. 'Boss of the Year" Award The board congratulated Graves for his recent recognition as the Jaycee's "Boss of the Year.• Graves expressed his appreciation to Soepcke and the rest of the BCH /BMNH leadership group, stating their support and dedication to community healthcare made the award possible. Accounts Payable Graves fielded questions about the new format for the accounts payable listing, which was estimated to save Purchasing, Finance and Administration staff 11 hours of work over the old method of preparation. The new format, consisting of photocopies of check registers, was deemed acceptable by the group. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeis, seconded by Gilmer, to approve for payment the attached listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements as presented. All were in favor. Notion carried. Statistical Reports The statistics for December, 1991, were presented. Admissions and length of stay were discussed. It was noted that there were fewer admissions due to one physician's maternity leave and another physician's surgical leave during the year. O.R. services shifted from inpatient to outpatient. Radiology showed a significant decrease in basic procedures because of new radiology equipment in the physician clinic. • Financial Reports Financial reports were distributed and discussed. Net patient revenue for the month was $1,115,347. December's operating loss was $139,622. Year -to -date patient revenue was $16,470,504; discounts of $3,457,000, or 21% of business, were subtracted, leaving a net operating revenue of $13,012,823. Operating expense YTD was $13,478,809. After adding other Revenue of $214,804, HCH ended the year with a $251,182 lose. The BMNH income statement showed revenue for the year of $3,012,239 and expenses of $290,045, resulting in an operating gain of $22,535. Non - operating revenue was $23,709. The net income was $46,244. Appreciation was expressed for the efforts HCH management and physicians are making to improve the Hospital's financial picture. Adiournment. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. by President Johnson. Respectfully submitted, A V U X�, 40k� �a --, 4 -r . Laurie Hulkonen James F. Mills Recording Secretary Secretary LH L l 4 HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL REVENUE & EXPENSE ----------------- TOTALREVENUE Discounts NET OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES: Benefits Professional Fees Medical Fees Utilities, Mtnce Contracts 6 Repairs Food, Drugs 3 Supplies Other Expenses Depreciation Interest Total Operating Expense OPERATING MARGIN TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) NET INCOME (LOSS) ---------------- TOTALREVENUE Discounts NET OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries Benefits Professional Fees Medical Fees Utlit"s, Mtnce Contracts S Repairs Food Drugs 3 Supplies Other Expenses Depreciation Interest Total Operating Expense OPERATING MARGIN TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (E)(PENSE) NET INCOME (LOSS) • Income Statement for Period Ended January 31, 1992 YM ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS BUDGET JANUARY 92 %of JANUARY 92 %of Actual Total Budget Total 1.577,457 100.00% --- 0 (378,075) -23.64% 0 1,201,382 76.16% 0 612,561 36.63% 0 123 7.85% 0 37,848 2.39% 0 55,412 3.51% 0 39,919 2.53% 0 208,415 1321% 0 53,545 3.39% 0 79,178 5.02% 0 - - 53,810 3.40% 0 1.264,204 80.14% +� 0 ----------- ----------- -3.98% 0 9,272 0.59% 0 ---- - - - --0 - -- - -- ---- -3.39% - 20.50% ERR ERR ERR Increase, Percent (Decrease) Variance 1.577,457 ERR (378,075) ERR 1,201.382 ERR ERR 612,561 ERR ERR 123.694 ERR ERR 37.949 ERR ERR 55,412 ERR ERR 39,919 ERR ERR 208,415 ERR ERR 53.545 ERR ERR 79,176 ERR ERR 53,610 ERR ERR 1264,204 --- ERR 0.67% ERR --- -- - - -- - (92.,822) -- - -- ERR ERR 9,272 ERR ERR - -- (53,549) - - - ERR YTD ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL JANUARY 92 %of JANUARY 91 %of Increase Percent Actual Total Actual Total (Deereaee) Varier" - -- 1,577,457 100.00% 1,409,747 100.00% 187,710 11.90% (376,075) - 23.84% (218,307) - 15.34% (159,768) 73.86% -- 1,201,382 70.16% 84.66% 7,942 0.67% 612,591 38.83% - -- 657,121 39.52% 55,480 9.95% 123,894 7.85% 124,490 8.83% (586) -0.48% 37,649 2.39% 47,356 3.38% (9,707) - 20.50% 55,412 3.51% 100,509 7.13% (45,097) -44.87% 39,919 2.53% 45.129 3.20% (5,210) - 11.54% 208,415 1321% 182,669 12.97% 25,546 13.97% 53,545 3.39% 51,694 3.67% 1,651 3.58% 79,178 5.02% 38,878 2.76% 40,300 103.69% 53,610 3.40% 12,675 ------- 0.90% 40,935 --- -- 32296% - - ---' --- ------ 1.264204 80.14% -- 1,160.720 82.34% 103,484 6.92% (62,622) - 3.98% 32,720 2.32% (95.541) - 292.00% 9272 0.59% 26,541 1.88% (17,269) - ---- - 65.07% -----' --- -- ---- (53,549) aaaxxxxaza -— 3.39% -- - - --- 69,261 x- axzaxxxa 420% (112,810) - 190.36% ax_ axx�sx xx.a • PUBLICATION NO. 4347 , PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER: Thursday, February 27, 1992 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of City Hall for the purpose of: • issuing an intoxicating liquor license to Steve Picha, operator of Hutch Pizza Inc. /J's Sports Bar, located at 18 Main Street N. This hearing will be held by the city Council of the City of Hutchinson. At such hearing, all persons interested may be heard. City Administrator Feb , - uary 25, 1992 Dated r� LJ A MARK A. CARRIGAN, ESO. ATTO""EV AT LAW Phone: 612 -567 -5900 CARRIGAN LAW OFFICE 227 SOUTH MAIN MA 1992 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 ° �C� Q d BV March 9, 1992 City of Hutchinson ATTENTION: CITY COUNCIL 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 DZ EZ RE: Representation of Mr. Gene Doherty Proposal to Abandon 3.2 Liquor License - Upon Approval of Liquor License Dear Council Members: Please be informed that I represent Mr. Gene Doherty in connection with Mr. Doherty's application for a liquor license for "J's Sports Bar" located at 16 North Main, Hutchinson, Minnesota. In that regard, please note that Mr. Doherty, who also has a 3.2 • liquor license issued by the City of Hutchinson for "J's Pizza Garten ", proposes to simply drop his 3.2 liquor license upon your anticipated approval of his liquor license issued in the name of "J's Sports Bar ". Sincerely, Mark�gan MAC /kjh • • MEMORANDUM TO: Gary Plotz, City Administra or FROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Poli DATE: March 5, 1992 RE: Liquor License Application - J's Sports Bar Attached herewith please find a copy of Sgt. Ron Kirchoff's investigation into the liquor license application for intoxicating and non - intoxicating liquor submitted under the name of Steven Robert Picha. The liquor license application is for J's Sports Bar located at 18 Main Street North. Based upon Sgt. Kirchoff's investigation it is my recommendation that the license application be denied due to several reasons. I believe that there is a business relationship between Mr. Picha and Mr. Gene Dougherty who is the owner of J's Pizza Garden and operates the business under the name of Hutch Pizza, Inc. Mr. Dougherty currently owes the state of Minnesota for back sales . taxes and would not be subject to licensure at this time. In fact, Mr. Dougherty will not be allowed to renew his current non - intoxicating liquor license. Additionally, Sgt. Kirchoff's investigation revealed that the current parking regulations would not be met as well as the fact that the liquor license requirement for intoxicating liquors requires that the premises serve food and be able to seat at least 85 patrons. Based upon the forgoing it is the recommendation of the police department that the liquor license for J's Sports Bar be denied. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience. /lkg 92 -02 -0007 • A • MEMORANDUM TO: Chief Steve Madson FROM: Sgt. Ron Kirchoff DATE: March 4, 1992 RE: License application for intoxicating and intoxicating liquor. Steven Picha Upon receiving an application from Steven Robert Picha for a license to sell intoxicating and non- intoxicating malt liquor at the address if 18 Main St N with a trade name of J's Sports Bar. The investigation went into the area of criminal activity, character and business reputation. In the area of criminal activities I found no criminal activity in the surrounding area as well as in the former addresses of Mr. Picha. . In the application request Mr. Picha states that he is employed by The Pizza Garten. In contacting business references listed by Mr. Picha, Apple Valley Food, I spoke to Clair Hemenay. Mr. Hemenay stated that they deliver to Hutch Pizza, Inc. in Hutchinson. He stated that the deliveries are a cash and carry basis and at times had to with hold delivery until payments could be made. Mr. Hemenay states that he has never had to refer any charges to collection agencies however states that they are on a cash and carry with a seven day maximum on their terms. While conducting the background investigation I met with Mr. Picha at 18 Main St N. I was advised by Mr. Picha that he did not hold a restaurant license nor would there be any restaurant equipment being placed in his establishment. I was advised that Hutch Pizza Inc. or Pizza Garten would provide meal service to J's Sports Bar. I was further advised and observed an open doorway between these two establishments. During the investigation I spoke to Gene L. Dougherty, � Hutch Pizza (Pizza Garten). Mr. Dougherty is the lessor of the premises IS Main N. I was advised by Mr. Dougherty that Mr. Picha has a 30 cay monthly lease on 18 Main N. In reviewing Hutchinson city code sections 501 (1 -40) I have the following recommendation: (1) J's Sports Bar is not classified as a club by definition nor is it classified as a hotel. Sub 20 means an establishment other than a hotel under the control of a single proprietor or manager where meals are S�A- , 2 . served at tables to the general public and have seating capacity of at least 85 guests. Vs Sports Bar does not hold a Minnesota Restaurant license. Under licensing section 5.05: (2) parking regulations no initial license shall be granted for operation on premise unless such premise includes off street parking area within 100 feet of a public entrance and have a parking capacity of a one car space for each three people seated. Such off street parking shall be owned or leased by the owner of the premises. City section 5.40: (3) Liquor License requirement. I� is unlawful for any person directly or indirectly under any pretense or by any device to sell, barter, keep for sale or other wise dispose of liquor, as part of a commercial transaction without the license therefore form the city. This section shall not apply 1) to such portable liquors as are intended for therapeutic purposes and not as a beverage, 2) to industrial alcohol and its components not prepared or used for beverages purposes, 3) To wine in the possession of someone duly license in this chapter,as an on sale wine licensee, 4) to sale by manufacturers to wholesalers duly licensed as such by the commissioner or, 5) to sales by wholesalers to persons holding liquor licenses from the city. The city may issue annual on sale liquor licenses only to restaurants and clubs or congressionally chartered veterans organizations provided that liquor sales will only be made to members and bonified guests. City code 5.05: (4) liquor and on sale license restriction regulations and unlawful acts sub 1. Upon required According to the issuance of any license applicant shall file with the City Administrator a bond with a corporate security cash or United States Government Bonds in the sum of $3000.00 for an on sale license or wine license. A bond filed under this subdivision must be conditional on the license obeying all laws governing the business and paying all taxes, fees, penalties and other charges and must provide that the bond is forfeited to the city issuing the license on a violation of law. the commissioner must approve all bonds filed by applicants with an off sale liquor license.The bond that was posted with the application was issued to GENE L. DOUGHERTY 1384 M% HUTCH PIZZA INC 18 MAIN ST N. HUTCHINSON, MN. City Code 5.50 subdivision 2: (5) license in connection with premises of another to whom a license could not be issued under the provisions of this chapter. This subdivision does not prevent the granting of a license to a proper licensee because the person has leased the premises of a minor, a non • citizen who is not a resident alien or a person who has been convicted of a crime other than a violation of this chapter. 91 • While completing the background investigation I was informed that Hutch Pizza (Pizza Garten) Gene Doughert is not eligible to be re licensed pending t of certain fees to the Stare of Mi It is the opinion of this write- these City Code Regulations must be cleared to the councils satisfaction prior to issuing a license. \pn:Jg 1I 202licinfo PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1992 S PUBLICATION NO. 4339 NOTICE OF PUBLIC I TEARLNG ON AMEI`'DIIENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND FNANCE- PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4, ANTI) THE TAX L\'CRIMENT FIlVANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX D4CREN1F1-, DISTRICT NO. 5 AND APPROVAL OF A TAX D, FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 NOTICE- IS I EREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City e.° Hutchinson will hold a public hearing on proposed amendments (the "Arr,endments ") to the Development Program (the "Development Program ") and Finance Plan for Development District No. 4 (the "Development District ") and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment Tax Increment District No. 5 previously established by the City, and on the proposed approval by the City Council of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan for District No- 6 ") which creates a Tax Increment Financing District to be designated as Redevelopment Tax Increment District No. 6 ( "Tax Increment District No. 6 ") in the City. The public hearing will be held at 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, Marc]) 10, 1992, at the Hutchinson City Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Under the Amendments and the Financing Plan for District No. 6, tax increments from lax increment financing districts located in the Development District will be us--d for the payment of costs of the City of carrying out the Development Program or for the payment of debt service on bonds or other obligations to be issued by the City for payment of such costs. It is proposed that all tax increment revenues from Tax Increment District No. 6 and the other tax increment districts in the Development District resulting from increases in the tax capacity of taxable real property therein be segregated and applied to payment of costs of the City in carrying out the Development Program. Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion of the City. The map shows the area from which the tax increments may be collected and the area in which tax increments may be expended. All who wish to be heard as to the Amendments and on the approval of the Financing Plan for District No. 6 will be given an opportunity to express their views at the time of the public hearing or may file written comments with the City Administrator prior to the public hearing. • By /s/ Cary D. Plotz City Administralor I. Block 47 II. Street right -of -way as follows: First Avenue Northeast from the eastern boundary of Jefferson, east to the • eastern most right -of -way line of Adams Street. Adams Street from the northern most right -of -way line of First Avenue N.E. extended, south to the southern most right -of -way of Washington Avenue. Washington Avenue from the eastern most right -of -way line of Adams Street, west to the eastern most right -of -way line of Jefferson Street. 111. That part of Adams Street as platted in the Townsite of Hutchinson, North Half, according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows: Beginning at ti:e northeast comer of Block 47 In sald plat; thence South 0 degrees 38 minutes 02 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the east line of said Block 47 a distance of 222.98 feet; thence North 15 degrees 33 minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 214.14 feet; thence North 74 degrees 26 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 62.18 feet to tha point of beginning. CiTIF1:.1T_ CF SV.T.rEY for CITY OF H'J:CHI::SY. �I S I ID f -- 171 f, zr { _i...- - - -. -- - - -- -- .. - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- I LJ W Lt. r . - w 4I .,. s s I 0 0 11 City of F� 14 E 14 0 R A N D U 14 DATE: February 19, 1992 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED TAY. IX REMENT DISTRICT FOR PHASE II DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT The Planning Commission is in approval of the concept of the Tax Increment District for Phase II. `J 0 City 11:111 37 it4nsl:iu; ton .4 zy2:11L 11 est f6I2) 557 -5151 Parks & Rccrenfion 900 H :nrin�lou Shect (612) 557 -2975 Fltt}C11inson, Aii11 Resota 55350 Police Delyarhnent 10 Franklin Street So:rt;r (612) 5S7 -2212 C , J • L r � J SSA {� 1 '�i;n�� I�lt;,... -:-�.� L�'� � S��Cl �_lS•ui.� ��I'1,1'�. 0.ikG.\ 1 r n r � n n \ C�uA Scc ,- 6 - -A• Hospitality Management Inc. Industrial Feeding Programs • Gourmet Catering February 27, 1992 Hutchinson City Council City Hall Hutchinson, MN 55350 Gentlemen: THE l !N►DflF ; i OUIN!D 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 612 -587 -7997 /w�h< 4 - 10 ti FEB 1992 O A situation has arisen concerning rubbish collection at The Underground Bar 8 Grill for which we request assistance from the City Council. Currently, we share a 2 yard dumpster with all of the occupants of 101 Park Place. This dumpster is picked up 6 times per week at a total cost of $242.20. The problem is that a 2 yard dumpster is not sufficiently large enough to hold the volume of • rubbish that we dispose of. As a result, we are forced to place our boxes and other items on the ground next to the dumpster. For this, we are charged approximately $20.00 for every 2 yards that the rubbish hauler must pick up around the dumpster. As you can see by the attached bills, that has amounted to $2,825.00 in extra rubbish hauling fees since our opening in September, 1990. This amount is over and above the $242.20 monthly charge. We contacted Junker Sanitation, the rubbish hauler, and he advised us that a 6 yard dumpster, emptied 4 to 6 times a week, would be equal to or slightly greater than our current base fee of $242.20, and that there would likely be no need for the extra fees because of the larger capacity dumpster. The problem is that a 6 yard dumpster would not fit into the space currently allowed for our dumpster. We would need to place the dumpster on the City parking lot behind our building, which is in violation of City ordinances. The worse scenario would be that the dumpster would take up one parking space. The best scenario would be that the dumpster would fit on a City awned "island" directly behind Domino's Pizza. We also believe that a larger dumpster would be warranted because, although we try very hard to police the area regularly, the extra rubbish is still visually unattrac- tive. of course, we welcome other suggestions. As I am sure you can understand, it is our desire to lower expenses in every way possible. of course, it is also our desire to refrain from being a burden upon the City. At this time, we respectfully request that the City Council consider allowing us to increase our dumpster capacity by placing it on City property. Your consideration would be greatly appreciated. Please contact me with any ques- tions or concerns. Thank you. Best Regards, u5 � uj \Uc �- 91 M. Khwice Owner CITY. '17/90 1 30/90 30/90 wim OL%CW T ON REFERENCE BILLING PERIOD: 1.000 PAYMENT--THAW YQU 1.000 2 YARD 3 X WEEK 9 CAI 1.000 SALES TAX t AUTO JAPUES I PAYWNTSICREDiTS BAIAA; P"r4mm &&LANCE ;3 is. -i 121. 311.E 1.000 FINANCE CHARGE v 9 . cc 0.90 319-.- ( 114 40. EXTRA YARDS 360.00 679. DdNvW or -1 c Ena X CmPleted 4 1 Pproved 9 an 1 — - USOFYOUR r. No. 596416 S t Y , 120 DAYS & OVER 0 . ( o pet W4�— NEW BALANCE E. 79 _ � sigax 70 DA YS 90 DAYS 128. h11, NKER SANITATION SERVFCENNC_.. P.O. BOX246, STILLWATER. MN 65082,PHONE439-7135 ' 1 - PAYTHS • F'�vr!J_7 du__ dr : 10/ 15/30 AMOUNT D OF14 DAY YR. Dry DESCF4PrA)N REFERENCE CHARGES PAYkENTSICREDITS BALANCE H��F'P' P T(' i 0_ TH, v "4(.2 0 PREVOJS BALANCE 6 L L !V3 P E R 1 OC T(' I " =`:+ 16/1; 7 1 j "I V�-_W F � A.'l � [vi EiN T - - T H Y'. U SIGNED rusOFYOUR 'YARD G. X. WEE-` GODAYS PO, A a OVE_k NEW8ALANCE T. NO. z r , I q;: -.4: #=OUNTS PAYABLE DELIVERED OR 11! SIGNED • ._; ': GREETING.E.' AND A. NEW YEAR,/, EA;_ FULL OF HEALTH AND HAPPINES,; I 59626 190 . 44 0.00 491 . E _SOLA-ql 6111" t ?AYASLF APP SOVAI • D OF14 E SIGNED H��F'P' P T(' i 0_ TH, v "4(.2 0 SIGNED rusOFYOUR CURRENT 30DAYS ' 1 GODAYS PO, A a OVE_k NEW8ALANCE T. NO. q;: -.4: ef!7-.A 7 4: al NKERSANITATlIJig$E;IVCLI STILLWATEP 55082.PrION.439-735 A Derv. (qc) 6olr)g PAYTHS FAvr.i ce AMOUNT BILLING PERIOD: NOV. 1990 4. 26/90 1.000 F'AYMENT--THANI YOU 24 139'? - 247. 190 30/90 1.000 2 YARD 6 X WEEK 423. 30/90 1.000 SALES TAX AUTO 13.99 4:7. ': 1 6.000 EXTRA YARDS 54.00 491.�_: #=OUNTS PAYABLE DELIVERED OR 11! SIGNED • ._; ': GREETING.E.' AND A. NEW YEAR,/, EA;_ FULL OF HEALTH AND HAPPINES,; I 59626 190 . 44 0.00 491 . E _SOLA-ql 6111" t 2E. 99 1 .900 EG',MENT— TS;AN: YOU 24173 - 301.19 190 c 1.000 2 YARD G X WEEK: 233.20 A23. ? 1 /S0 1,000 SAL E::. - =X AUTO 13.99 �i!'?el X8_000. EXTRA YARDS ��LF APPROVAL " cni M C _ `jUVE -AED O • IMPLETED: SIGNED .,PPROV HA ?F'Y N ,l; , 1 Y y PAYURNT: �y 1 SIGNED TU90F YOUR CURRENT 30 DAy51 d� BO AY5 11t 80 DAV5 L_l I 120 DAYS L1`" NEW BAS O NCE ` T. NO. ` / ^ I h fl NKER SANITATION SERVICE. INC.. P. C. dCT 6, 5TILLWATER, MN 55082, PHONE 439 -7135 - 1'_1_ /} ' - J. _ - _ PAY THIS qi bluL�� Fc, . - 11 ±. _. •. -C:. AMOUNT DA Y YR DTY DESCRIPTION AEFESENCE i CHARGES PAYMENTS BALANCE PR BALANCE JAN 199'_ c y` •o, 1 G75;ti1 rci.; — 01J i/91 12.000 EXTRA YARDS 108.00 29. 1 . Ac)c1 2 FART? G• X WEEK A ; -•' v i�[i�Asea APPROVAL ' DELIVERED OR bf,IPL.lTED: SIGNED , PROVED FOR • HA�r7 JH_ENTII•ir1 �oI I sONED r YOUR I CURRENT 30 DAYS I 60 DAYS I 90DAYS I 120 DAYS &OVER - NEWBALANCE T., TER, MN 55082, PHONE 439 -7135 Mar. g I i I l It PAY THIS J C7 . 14 j F;; v!ment- due dat= AMOUNT DAY YR OTY. DESCRIPT"4 REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS RALANCE .FS BILLING PERIOD: FEBRUARY 91 1 ^a°cus"AU&Nm = 1 /2E/91 1.000 PAYMENT - -THANK YOU 24505 -- :Jyc9 /28/91 15.000 EXTRA YARDS 144.00 :?4.4 /28/91 1.000 2 YARD E X WEEK: 2.'3.20 SE7.r. /28/91 1.000 SALES TAX AUTO �j 2.E3 590.2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL )EUVERED 0 ... am HAVE A PPY GLO eAOVED TUS OF YOUR vA YMENT. CUR I T. NO. _rGc — , , cC. ^ Lk -q 1 b l I�nc� EASTER STILLWATER,MN 550 0.00 60 DAYS 90 DAYS 120 DAYS 6 OVER 0.0 0.9 0. NEW BAE 590. Payment due Ira t1:� 115191 PAYTHIS AMOUNT JJi 7i i.i. vVV _gin i:n Ir .�- I_S i. .; FLC• REFERENCE 1 31791' 1'.000 2 YARD E X WEEK 3ALANCE 233.20 549.5 /31/91 1.000 SALES TAX AUTO 21.55 DESC R I PTION 571. • 1.000 PAYMENT -- THANK. YOU PAYABLE APP OVAL 1991 - 3..0.75 190.1 /30/91 ACCOU473 EXTRA YARDS - 49.5. < = 234.00 31/91 220.000 •yEPED 134)/41 SILiNED 2 YARD 6 X WEEK' 131 /91 1 �2 � '��) COMP'J:T - /30/91 1.000 :-ALES TAX AUTO =:.03 APPROVE 1, SIGNED PAYMENT ( ' - US OF YOUR ,59F,2 RRMI) , 7 � 30 4 4�4 90 DAYS 4) . 4 f 90 DAYS 0 . 4�S) 120 DAYS & � NEW BlE. + OV 0 AIAN - N O. 3� .-e � . .7135 NKER SANITATION SERVICE. INC.. P.O- BOX 246, STILLWATER, MN 5' 2 PHONE 439 4�.c.� F'a�r rienr. due 'fat - e. 04 /1_;91 9 �7 I maU "I l YJI �1 I I nQ J PAY THIS AMOUNT DAY YR OTY. 1 DES CRPTgN REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS 3ALANCE PAY THIS BILLING PERIOD; APRIL 1991 PREVIOUS BALANCE 571 DAY YR CITY. DESC R I PTION 125/91 1.000 PAYMENT -- THANK. YOU X47-3 - 1991 - 3..0.75 190.1 /30/91 25.000 EXTRA YARDS - 49.5. < = 234.00 31/91 220.000 424.4 134)/41 1.000 2 YARD 6 X WEEK' 131 /91 1 �2 � '��) 6,57 . r " /30/91 1.000 :-ALES TAX AUTO =:.03 528., 685 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL DELIVERED • ^.V,PLETED- SIGNED TO ENABLE U=` TO SERVE J BETTER -:OVED PLEASE USE ACCOUN T ON REMITTAN PAYMENT. T N O . YOUR CU��)>✓ 30DAYS SO DAYS 4, 90DAYS j / L ;#Q AYS&VQNEF NEW BALANCE ACE •+_ 13A A NKER SANITAT166 gEPVICE, IN .0. BOX 24 . STKLWATEA, MN 55082. PHONE 439 -7135 . Sung q I 1� 1111 PAY THIS J 0,4)l) Payment due date AMOUNT DAY YR CITY. DESC R I PTION REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS BALANCE BILLING PERIOD; MAY 1991 PREVIOUS BALANCE Eoc F -1/:1 1.000 PAYMENT -- THANK: YOU4 =. ^_ - 49.5. < = 190.E 31/91 220.000 EXTRA YARDS 180.00 370.' 131 /91 1 t YARD E. X WEEK: '/23.'_3'_ 20 603? . E. .000 '31/91 1.000 SALES TAX A1JTO 24.79 528., ACCOUNTS F '19LNERED Oy SI F A SIGNED TUS�OUR T. NO. C9F. NKER SANITATION SER s�1 q I _ 'ED FOf - ..YMdNT: �' 30 DAYS 80 DAYS d�7.9_ 191).4 P.O . STILLW ATER. MN 55082, PHONE 439 -71 bluin 0.(�il DAYS B. OVER I NEW BALANCE 0 . i) 628. - /17/91 PAYTHIS LLie �4at.e; 06 AMOUNT /19191 1.000 130/91 /28/91 1.004 /26/91 1.000 ` BILLING FERIQU, vUL PAYMENT - - THANK YOU " 1 " SALES TAX .IVE9ED OR 'LETED: ROVED PAYMENT: jam 30 DAYS A SO DAYS I A 4 .WATER.WY 65082.PHONE439.7135 i1 _ Ljif ')AYABLE APP >vA 3ELP'F :D AMP :T SIGNED APPA aOR PAYMENT: SIGNED . CURRENT I 30 DAYS BO DAYS DAYS T. NO. 54F-�f� MvC0RANITAT1nNBPRVICF STILLWATER. MN 55082. P110PIE 479 -7135 Aug.gk etuin 0 , (7 ii — 437.99 0 191j . - d24.Z E`S7 . F 58.5 120 DAYS &OVER I NEW BALANCE Ij c3 58S Fa'-:ent. due date; PAY THIS AMOUNT .YTS PAYABLE TOF YOUR I CURS T. . N NO. Sept. ciI blItI SIGNED 120 DAYS & OVER NEW BALANCE PAY THIS Payment due date: 08 /16 /91AMOUNT BILLIN3 DAY YR. QTY Y DESCRIPTION REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS BALANCE PAYMENTS /CREDITS BALANCE EXTRA YARD- EILL;.Nr, PERIOD: 'JULY 1991 PREVIOUS --, I PREVIOUSBALANCE GA,- 7 /19/91 1 000 FAM -NT- -THANK Y0;) 2.I:f_9 - 49;._2:3 19�! - '/31/91 18.000 AU To EXTRA YARDS t.S 152.00 / 1/ 91 1.000 ?S229 2 YARD F. X WEEK � . ' = : 2cj 's '/:31 191 1 .000 _ALES TAX AUTO: :'.5. E,o x•11 .YTS PAYABLE TOF YOUR I CURS T. . N NO. Sept. ciI blItI SIGNED 120 DAYS & OVER NEW BALANCE PAY THIS Payment due date: 08 /16 /91AMOUNT /19/91 '/31/91 '/ ^1/41 '/31/91 :125191 /�'•1 /91 3/ 31/91 ;/:1/91 BILLIN3 1 D AY Y O DESCRIPTION REFERENCE I CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS BALANCE EXTRA YARD- 41c. lE2.c7Q --, I PREVIOUSBALANCE .000 4-.C�C /19/91 '/31/91 '/ ^1/41 '/31/91 :125191 /�'•1 /91 3/ 31/91 ;/:1/91 LTUSOFYOUR CURRE RR JNNER SANITATION SERVICE, IN 0o,1-. Q I 24 952 2a ^3.2� AUTO 28.0:3 -495 BILLIN3 1 000 PAYMENT - -THAN`:, YOU 2 •O . 3 -14.5 2F.? , 5 18.000 — 420.83 EXTRA YARD- 41c. lE2.c7Q 1 .000 2 YARD 5 X WEEK: _'•" cLj 1 000 :ALES TAX AU To 2S t.S 1.000 PAYMENT -- THANK YqU ?S229 1 000 PAYMENT- -THANK qY I) DeiFvered 10.000 EXTRA YARDS 90.00 1.000 2 YARD E. X WEEKCOM*ted: 2,d 2'20 1 000 SALES TAX rH!) FI' Sig .47.27 Rppmed Payment: SigRUC LTUSOFYOUR CURRE RR JNNER SANITATION SERVICE, IN 0o,1-. Q I 24 952 2a ^3.2� AUTO 28.0:3 -495 c -; 511 . -14.5 2F.? , 5 469, — 420.83 JoI 41c. 2 , ..Y 1 4'24 . 90 DAYS 120 DAYS & OVER 1). c. , c3 . +.) 0 NEW BASE 4�2d 246. STILLWATER, MN 55082. PHONE 439 -7135 �.4' -_:1 t �._ }.e' GYM / '' ;I I., . , . AMOUNT Il u_ 27191 Y HH8 PAym;fyr- -THW4 '. Yn:1 26:48 —379. n7 t.7 _ low 370 '�3c) /yt 1 H�)!) � u• b X WEEt:: �� -'C. 6 1'> _ 3(1/51 1.00n SALES A fi:! i , 2 7 4.1 �..1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL • •'IELVEv 4PL SIGNED 'AO PAYMENT: SIGNED SIGNED US OF YOUR E BO,DA LOVER NEW BALANCE S4 F.'a_F =OAYS 1 Q 1. KER SANITATION SERVICE. IN(C�.. - WATER. MN 56082. PHONE 439 -7135 1.OV "1 �J�I�I�� '�' f�!i PAMm TH IS ll v_* �.� � =!l i. •_�;? % i -G' :i AMOUN BALANCE DAY YR. OTY DESCRYPTION REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS %CRECBTS BILL-""'(l rEht: =>:;; OCT i75'! PR EVIDVS B - ICJ.— L1I�I SrJ.00k� EXTRA f'%RDC. A t•c.dNl _'�• 000 r. F. ^ ' - 'T • YA3L ?APPROVAL T'3J 0 STONED • V•RED PAVE A T= 1:�.' - .:i:, _: (�T' ✓iP�j:,i:_Iil;i'f' SIGNED USOFYOUR - CURRENT I 30DAYS BODAYA '- I - "D DAYS&eVER- NEW BALANCE .NO. FvJ . ^F• 4:: )O 47 0 f 15t_i . $ !) c) 3 c) . Q F• ; JKERSSA NIITATION SEERVICE,1 ,P.0.80 %248 WATER, MN 56082, PHONE 439 -7135 ; eo- bitli � PAYT HIS J _ _ -_ 111 !_'i AMOUNT F': l:I;G1,jt ' DAY YR OTY. DESC 10I REFERENCE CHARGES PAYMENTS /CREDITS BALANCE_ -. r., w.:y •c•�[t-G Gi I E:'•LL -i= Etn .i.i, ��I -;: PR - c•i'�i i 0 —N) YJ`;? <` = - _ —C3 i . L7 1= ,-. c 2 0. Ml EXTRA YFFO_• - ;l) /� YASO 5 k WcEt.: _ - :'Nsl 1 SHLEc SAX p:)T <: 27.44 F-4 �;CC01�NT$ F YAIiLE AP ROVAL 'E! IVERED O IPLETED: SIGNED rR �%i .`•�yi,i;j Y(1.1 C1r GFT N%i �' PAYMENT: SIGNED 'HIS HOLIDAY $Ea;ON I _ 1f USOUR CURRENT 30DAYS 6d DAYS 0 AY 120DAYSLOVER NEW BALANCE 449.6 19.3 2'j 1 1 JKER SANITATION SERVICE, C.TN ►C. B. STILLWATER, MN 66082. PHONE 439 -7135 - bl'i IInQ PAY THIS o. J_ `�' i �, ��i J - ,. _�� kfi AMOUNT AMOUNT Of SOFYOUR CURRENT I 30D - Id 0. .59�. r, 54 yil 14- .ER SANITATION SERVICQ�C.,"tDX 246, STILLWATER, MN 55L tiMo.9- -- Zn dfln - '3VED F ✓ �: 60 DAYS r, I I 90 DAYS 120 DAYS% NEW BALANCE PHONE 439-713 F. vn ent ;e �2`.e klci 1 7! PAY THIS AMOUNT 0 ca 611 IAA �AYMENTSiCEDITS i AL Ar YR DAY r OTY. I DUOTT"" - RE REFENCE OIAROE3 PAYI,EMTSiCEOTS BA�ARQ 1.000 i=1 FfF - A,, ". TC-19 FAYMrNr-- THANK". Y(Y) FZ„DUSw.RcE �.5E.79 ��+ E•; :': 1 31/51 18.000 EXTRA YARDS ti =. 162,00 ?` - 1 31/91 1.NNY 2 YARD S X WEEK 2A2.20 L c l /51 1.000 SALE _• TAX TAX 2E• . 27 ti 31 /91 1 000 F [NANCE CHARGE DE IV VED O ^COUNTS P ABLE APPROVAL .LIVERED 0 3M PlETED: SIGNED WI�:HING YOU A NEW YEAR F1'LL I'F PEACE PRPS: 'ERI rY A °J ;J HA °FI ��S' -: %F?ROVE OR PAYMENT: SIGNED JSOFYOUR RENT I 30DAY6 BO DAYS 90 DAYS 120 OVER NEW BALSNCF no. S'3k•2�, X30 4 F.�t. IKER SANITATION SERVICE. INC.. P. 46. STILLWATER. MN 55082, PHONE 439 -7135 . Payment due date: 01/20/912 PAYTMIS AMOUNT Of SOFYOUR CURRENT I 30D - Id 0. .59�. r, 54 yil 14- .ER SANITATION SERVICQ�C.,"tDX 246, STILLWATER, MN 55L tiMo.9- -- Zn dfln - '3VED F ✓ �: 60 DAYS r, I I 90 DAYS 120 DAYS% NEW BALANCE PHONE 439-713 F. vn ent ;e �2`.e klci 1 7! PAY THIS AMOUNT 0 �AYMENTSiCEDITS i AL Ar YR Orr aII 1 f� r - �_1' , 1LJ L• •f rPr 1 =� I PEVIOIS BALANCE - 1 /yam j iYit Y�FD E. X '- 'EE;:: c, °_•N'_EE 7A t: ti =. i 7L 71 -_ ;^ UNTS E APPROVAL ti DE IV VED O �' SIGNED Of SOFYOUR CURRENT I 30D - Id 0. .59�. r, 54 yil 14- .ER SANITATION SERVICQ�C.,"tDX 246, STILLWATER, MN 55L tiMo.9- -- Zn dfln - '3VED F ✓ �: 60 DAYS r, I I 90 DAYS 120 DAYS% NEW BALANCE PHONE 439-713 F. vn ent ;e �2`.e klci 1 7! PAY THIS AMOUNT 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9645 RESOLUTION TO RENAME WEST RIVER PARR TO MASONIC /WEST RIVER PARK WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has received financial donations from many fine institutions over the years; and WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Masons desire to donate funds to develop Masonic Park in the year 1992 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Masons have pledge future support to develop Masonic Park NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1) that the Hutchinson City Council hereby recognizes and appreciates the support of the Hutchinson Masons, and to recognize their efforts renames West River • Park, located along Les Kouba Parkway to Masonic/West River Park. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • r RESOLUTION NO. 9670 CITY OF HUTCHINSON • RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR SCBA Update $ 5,049.00 Update to New Apparatus Fire Yes Clarey's Safety Eqmt Requirements Water Meters (102) 7,3 Replacement 6 Update Water Yes Water Product Co. The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM X11.91 PURPOSE DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR Date Approved: 4k otion made by: Seconded by: Resolution submitted for Council action by: 7— d . • RESOLUTION NO. 9678 RESOLUTION FOR RELEASE AND SUBSTITUTION OF PLEDGED SECURITIES AT FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, First State Federal Savings & Loan Association of Hutchinson, Minnesota, a city depository, has requested release of the following securities under the collateral agreement with the City of Hutchinson: NO. DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION AMO UNT 911219040 U.S. Treasury Bill $2,000,000.00 911230003 U.S. Treasury Bill 6,000,000.00 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the City Administrator be authorized to accept the substitution of the following pledged securities: Nom DESCRIPTION AMOUNT • 911226015 FHLMC Remic 1177UC $1,000,000.00 911226011 FNMA Remic 91 165FB 2,700,000.00 920130001 FNMA Remic 1992 -12FA 2,000,000.00 920130003 FNMA Remic 1992 -1OFB 1,000,000.00 920130004 FNMA Remic 1992 -1OFB 1,000,000.00 Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • 1 7 — 1?.. • ORDINANCE NO. 92 -55 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA, INCORPORATING AND ANNEXING CERTAIN TRACTS AND PARCELS OF LAND INTO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AS MORE PARTICULARLY SET OUT IN SAID ORDINANCE WHEREAS, certain parcels of land as more particularly described below abut or adjoin the City of Hutchinson; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Municipal Board pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 414 has approved the following annexation; WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to annex and incorporate said lands into the City of Hutchinson; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Hutchinson does ordain: SECTION 1. That the lands hereafter described shall be, and the same hereby are, annexed to the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal corporation, located in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota and from and after passage and publication of this ordinance, said lands shall be annexed to and become a part of and included in the corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson: • (1) SW; of NE;. in Sec. 12, Twp. 116N, R. 30W. (2) The West Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian. Except that part of the Southwest Quarter of said Southeast Quarter, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence easterly, along the south line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 494.87 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 250.00 feet northeasterly of, as measured at a right angle to, the northwesterly extension of the center line of the Hutchinson Municipal Airport runway; thence northwesterly, along said parallel line, a distance of 874.02 feet to the point of intersection of the northeasterly and southeasterly lines of Safety Zone A as per the Hutchinson Municipal Airport Zoning Ordinance; thence southwesterly, along said southeasterly line of Safety Zone A, a distance of 104.77 feet to the • west line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence southerly, along said west line, a distance of 729.57 feet to the point of beginning. 7 �� ORDINANCE NO. 92 -55 . PAGE 2 SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after publication. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of March, 1992. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • First Reading: Second Reading:_ Publication Date: • NSPEC, INC • ROOF • PAVEMEW • EXTERIOR WALL MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING C01VSTRUCTl0NADM 1N/STRA7PN 11qy • TESTING Y P 0 October 28, 1991 Ms. Kristine L. Folstrom Director of Support Services Hutchinson Public Schools 30 Glen Street North Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 L� N� RE; 1992 Flans, Specification and Construction Administration Services for Tennis Court Rehabilitation at Park Elementary School in Hutchinson Dear Kris: In accordance with our recent conversation, we are pleased to submit the following proposal Lo prepare plans and specifications and perform construction administration and quality control testing for tennis court rehabilitation for Hutchinson Public Schools. PROJECT DESCRIPTIO[i The project assignment consists of tennis enurt rehabilitation at Park Elementary School. SCOPE OF SERVICES Phase I - Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications will be prepared for tennis court rehabilitation under the following base bid: J Proi Park Elementary School The project would include routing and filling all existing cracks, covering the cracks with a geotextile to prevent reflective cracking, and overlaying the 4 courts with approximately 2" of new bitutainous pavement. The net posts would be replaced and the courts would be color coated and striped. Engineer's Can3trurt �st $30,000 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $30,000 5807 Duluth Street • Minneapolis, MN 55422 6121546 -3434 • Fax: 612'546-8669 4015 South Howick Street • Salt Lake City, UT 84107 801266.9381 • Fax' 801 '266-93W Hutchinson Public Schools • October 28, 1991 Page Two Plans and specifications will be prepared for the type of maintenance required. The facility will be specifically measured and accurately dimensioned to determine the estimated material quantities. Simultaneously, specifications will be developed along with your assistance concerning insurance, performance bonds, construction schedule and other items relevant to the project. Prior to construction bidding, a pre -bid meeting will be conducted to inform all bidders of the general intent of the plans and specifications and answer any project questions. At the bid opening our personnel will assist and provide bid tabulation forms. Phasc II - Construction Administration When the low bidder has been determined, our personnel will check references and make recommendations to the School Board concerning the history and reputation of the firm under consideration. We will conduct and document the pre - construction conference, review submittals, perform quality control testing, verify payment requests, prepare a construction photo log, provide full -time construction observation during bituminous plant mix placement, conduct the pre - final and final inspections, and obtain a signed and dated guarantee. At • completion, the project progress book, which includes both items listed in Phase I and Phase II, will be presented to the Owner for future reference. COST ESTIMATE We propose to prepare the plans and specifications (Phase I) and perform construction administration services (Phase II) including quality control testing during construction, and prepare the project progress book for a fee of $4,000. 1�� We appreciate the opportunity to have met with you to discuss the proposed projects for construction. We request that you review this proposal and if satisfactory, sign and return this proposal as our authorization to proceed. If you have questions concerning any item on this propaFnl, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, INSPEC, INC. Michael D. Remington ACCEPTED BY: Civil Engineer BY: /jkp TITLE: C T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mary Haugen, Facilities Manager DATE: March 2, 1992 RE: Sale of used dasher boards The new dasher board system installed last September at the Civic Arena has been performing very well. Players and coaches both are very pleased with the installation. 0 We have been storing the old wood frame boards at one of the park shelters. We've made an effort to sell them by advertising in three publications. "Let's Play Hockey ", the Ice Skating Institute of America's monthly newsletter, and the Minnesota Ice Arena Manager's newsletter "Around the Rink." A number of inquiries have been received from rinks in Minnesota, Wisconsin and one from Vancouver. When the rink operators learn of the age and construction of our dasher boards they lose their interest. We had hoped to receive upwards of $5000 for the old boards, but due in part to there being no plexiglas to go with the boards (we used the old glass with our new boards) no offers have been received. The City of Litchfield's Civic Arena now has offered us $1000 for the old dasher boards. Their boards were manufactured by the same company as ours and are nearly identical to them. They would be able to make use of them by replacing some of their more worn sections with some of our better panels. We have no other indoor storage options for the boards. Maintenance is scheduled to begin on the park shelter in April and the boards need to be moved out by then. Storage outdoors would result in their rapid deterioration. We recommend that the offer of $1000 be accepted and that we sell the old dasher boards to the City of Litchfield. • City Halt 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks G Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Deparhnent 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 . Printed on mcuded paper - CITY OF LITCHFIELD M I N N E S y O T A ©f: January 31, 1992 Mary Haugen, f=acilities Manager City of Hutchinson 900 Harington Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Dear Marv, Steve Olson and I would like to thank you for taking time to show us the old boards that you replaced from your ice arena. These boards are identical to the ones Litchfield has. We would be interested in purchasing these boards and metal posts for $1,000.00. Please except this as a formal offer. If this is acceptable please call Steve at 693 -2679 or myself at 693 -7201 to arrange a pick -up date. Thanks again. Sincerely, Charles DeWolf Public Works Director CD /cl • • • 9- 1?F, M:1sh:�il Avrnuc Nnrlh 0 L ilchlield. Minnesota 55355 (612) 693 - 7201 AN F .UAL OPPORTUNITY- AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER C March 5, 1992 MEMO TO MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1992 RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT BUDGET The attached resolution adopts for 1992 the special revenue fund for the Hutchinson Rural Fire Department. The budget as adopted has been approved by the townships under contract with the City of Hutchinson. Operations are fully funded by the townships and require no City of Hutchinson funds. • • Cihj Hall 37 Wash iugtonAvenuc lNest (612) 587 -5151 Parks &Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinsotl, Minnesota 55350 Printed on rccyded pmpn - 9-2�> CITY OF HUTCHINSON • RESOLUTION NO. 9671 RESOLUTION ADOPTING RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the annual special revenue budget for the Hutchinson Rural Fire Department Fund of the City of Hutchinson for the fiscal year 1992, which has been submitted by the City Administrator and approved by the City Council is hereby Adopted; the total of said budgets and the major division thereof being as follows: RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Revenues Fire Protection Assessment $19,868.00 Fire Truck Assessment 187,930.00 Interest Earning 1,500.00 Sale of Equipment 25,000.00 TOTAL $234_298_00 • Expenditures Personnel Services $15,315.00 Supplies, Repair, Materials 23,253.00 Other Services, Charges 2,100.00 Miscellaneous 300.00 Capital Outlay 189,580.00 TOTAL $230,548.00 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT the City Administrator be directed to cause the appropriate accounting entries to be made in the books of the City. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of March 1992 Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • C T0: Mayor 6 City Council FROM: Mark C. Schnobrich DATE: March 6, 1992 RE: 1992 Spring Tree Planting • The 1992 Spring boulevard tree planting is contingent upon the Small Business Administration Grant awarded Hutchinson in 1992. The grant is an award of $5,000 based on tree donations from Firstate Federal Savings 8 Loan of $1,400, Masonic Lodge Temple f59, $2,000 and also our 1992 budgeted line item for tree planting. The grant also requires us to have our trees planted by May 31, 1992 in order to be eligable for the funds. The Hutchinson Tree Board unanimously recommends that all $6,000 budgeted for trees, flowers and shrubs in 1992 be allocated in ordered to take advantage of the Small Business Administration Grant award of $5,000. klm • Cihj Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Deparhnent 10 Franklin Street South (611) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on mcyclyd Paper - 9 -F Citg of e rr kr r l, TO: Ken Merrill FROM: Mark Schnobrich DATE: March 10, 1992 RE: Street Names Within Tree Planting Project Area 3rd Avenue SE & SW Milwaukee Avenue 4th Avenue SE & SW Linden Avenue • 5th Avenue SE & SW Miller Avenue 6th Avenue SE Clinton Avenue 7th Avenue SE Lynn Road Washington Avenue E & W Dale Street Erie Street Madson Street Monroe Street Thomas Avenue Adams Street Hayden Avenue Hassan Street Osgood Avenue Main Street Fisher Street Franklin Street Lincoln Avenue Glen Street Harmony Lane Grove Street Lake Street Brown Street • citil Hr,11 7 41inEfon Az cniic IVtr (612) 557 -5151 Parks L Keeuratiom 90011,1r7ingtorr stnvct (612) 5S7 -1975 Ilutclrin,ar, :�Iiu11��_olYt 55150 Police Depertuient 10 Franklin Gr -tct South 1'l SS 7-.4' 0— F MM �STATE Of C-,+/� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (SBA) NATURAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM COMMUNITY TREE PLANTING Application for Grant Assistance WA 1 C I P I TT COUrt Hutchinson McLeod CONTACT MIKIN TELEPNM 10.0411E Mark Schnobrich (612) -587 -2975 ADDRESS (go. S Street, RFD, Sot Do.) CITY, STATE E ZIP CODE 900 Harrington Street Hutchinson Poi 55350 1. Project Objective (ama pupost ow ob k ): • - To utilize grant assistance to extend our boulevard planting program to include replanting elm devastated boulevards which have not been fully restored. - To include, for the first time, full participation of two local nurseries in both retail tree purchase and planting of purchased plant materials. - To incorporate volunteers and community service adults and minors into the planting process. 2. Project Cod: S 22,810 (Total Cod) $ 7.400 (Local Unit Share (Cash)) $ 10,410 (In-kind Contributions) 0 Grant Amount Requested : 5 000 (MUt not be Erater that M of project cwt; asII a Srant: S5,000.00) (Over) 9 -F APPLICATION FOR GRAN ASSISTANCE 3. 4. S. 6. project Description (including location of trees, number of trees to be planted, type species, size• and age of trees and vicinity maps showing planting sites: (Attach supporting docuouK.tlon it nec essary) To replace boulevard trees lost to dutch elm disease in established sections fa tjr.m. (See enclosed map). Species to be planted are: sugar maple, catalpa, Kentucky coffee tree, bur oak, bi -color oak, Canada red cherry, hackberry, American linden, Redmond linden (1 " -2" diameter). Plant 300 trees. Personnel Involved (list persomAl with their qualification, exWienee And upervision responsibilities) Mark Schnobrich, City Forester in Hutchinson for 12 years, duties include all aspects of implanting this grant. Planting Standards: (speel site selection, site properation, planting stock selection and cars, dates of planting and maintena eehoduls). All planting shall conform to the forestery handbook (2nd edition) Karl Wenger, Editor, for the Society of American Foresters, Sections 8 6 16 1984. Planting commence April 17, 1991 and be completed by May 10th. Additional Informations ()t no to any *cation, attack explanation) a. Does community meet TREE CITY USA standards? b. Will nursery stock be obtained from a small business certified nursery? C. Will project allow more than one small business establishment to perform the work? r YES NO ® 0• �'.1 �W I � IIUe) Data 7 /4, le? I H E M O R A N D U M March 5, 1992 Tot Mayor and City Council FROMs John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Discussion of Setting Date for Public Hearing on Crow River Dam Operation and Maintenance We would like to hold a Public Hearing either later this month or early next month to discuss the operation and maintenance of the dam. The meeting will involve the National Weather Service and the DNR, as well as the County Emergency Management Director and communities noted in our emergency notification list. • We would like representation but do not necessarily feel Please let me know if certain interested in attending. from the City Council at the meeting, that the entire Council must attend. dates will not work, and who would be City Hall Parks &Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587.2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Prinfed on rrcucled paper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9 -� city o f a W E M OR A N D U H March 5, 1992 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Discussion of 1992 Airport Improvements Attached is a letter from TKDA dated February 29, 1992 regarding projected costs on the proposed Airport Improvements. The final estimate of costs has risen $500,000 (from $2,700,000 to $3,200,000). Since this phase is 90% Federal funds, the projected increase to the City share is $50,000. The Council has set aside $150,000 for the project to this point. Ray Strege and Jerry Peterson of TKDA were at the Airport Commission meeting on Monday, March 2nd to discuss the increase in costs. The Airport Commission reviewed the options to decrease the costs, and agreed to follow the recommendation to utilize alternatives 1, 2 and 3 but not 4, and leave the scope of the project alone. The Airport Commission passed a motion to proceed with the Airport Improvement and review the potential for obtaining additional funding for the remainder of the project. They will be discussing the situation with HTI to see if they are willing to provide a no interest loan, or otherwise help with the funding. They are also requesting that the City Council consider funding the remainder of the projected cost increase. We stand a very good chance of beginning construction this June or July due to additional Federal funds becoming available. If additional Federal funds do not become available this fiscal year, we expect to be funded for construction in October. NOTES Bill Craig of HTI has passed along concerns from Jeff Green that the current condition of the Airport is affecting the ability of HTI to utilize the Airport. One plane sustained damage running off the runway, and additional planes have had to be rerouted. The current runway condition is potentially dangerous for their planes to utilize, and it is causes additional expense to HTI. E City Hall Parks G Recreation Police Departnient 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612)587.2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Pnnfed on recvcicd pnryvr - fKDA TOL ANDERSON ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED ANDA ASSOCIATES. ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2600 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK MALDRIG SAW PAUL UMNSOTA66101 1893 ' 612/292 -4400 FAX 612/202-OM VIA FACSIMILE February 29, 1992 Mr. John P. Rodeberg, P.E. Director of Engineering 37 Washington St. Hutchinson MN 55350 FAX 1- 234 -4240 Re: Hutchinson Airport Expansion Estimated Project Cost Update Commission No. 9946 • Dear John: Jerry Petersen and I plan to meet with you and the Airport Commission on Monday, March 2. The three major topics of discussion with the Commission are anticipated to be the escalation of estimated project construction cost, increases in engineering costs and the possible availability of 1992 federal airport improvement funds for Hutchinson. The order -of- magnitude cost estimate for first phase airport expansion listed costs that include construction, engineering, testing and,administrative items at $2,700,000. The current estimate for the same items with construction costs based upon plan quantities totals $3,200,000. This results in a $50,000 increase to the local share. Since the order -of- magnitude estimate was prepared, the following changes have been made which increased the project costs: 1. As a result of the adoption of the 1,000- foot -wide primary surface the runway profile was revised to provide required clearance over Trunk Highway 15 at the edge of the ultimate Runway Protection Zone. 2. Adoption of the 1,000- foot -wide primary surface also resulted in a substantial increase in the quantity of excavation. This was required to remove the mounds located on either side of the runway that penetrate the primary surface. 3. The size of the culvert required for storm runoff under the runway and taxiway was significantly increased to accommodate the runoff from the upstream drainage area. L 9 -r As a result of detailed design analysis, four alternatives for reducing project costs were . developed: 1. Utilize a Class 5 aggregate for the pavement base course in lieu of 100% crushed aggregate. 2. In the areas of runway and taxiway shoulders, strip only the turf and top 6 inches of the topsoil layer shown by soil borings. This reduces the quantity of excavation and backfill required under embankments. 3. In areas of extensive excavation, strip only the turf and top 6 inches of the indicated topsoil layer. The remaining topsoil underlying the top 6 inches can be used in lower portions of embankment construction under the runway and taxiway shoulders outside of pavement areas. 4. Reduce the thickness of the bituminous mat to 2 inches . The first three alternatives provide major cost savings with only slight long tenn drawbacks. These changes have been incorporated into the construction plans. The forth alternative, reducing the thickness of the bituminous mat, provides a significant short term cost reduction but may result in excessive future maintenance costs. While the near term savings may be as much as $10,000 to the City, maintenance costs paid by the City 2 to 4 years after construction could be 2 to 3 times the $10,000 initial savings. The fourth alternative will also present problems in achieving the specified standards of bituminous mixture quality. Finding locally available aggregates that meet the specified low percentage of spall materials will • be difficult and expensive, at best. The materials might need to be shipped into Hutchinson from a source outside the area Primary factors resulting in increased engineering costs include: The redesign and redrafting required to provide the 1,000 -foot primary surface. 2. Additional effort required to develop cost reduction alternatives. Revising the plans to implement cost reduction alternatives. 4. Additional soils investigation (previously approved by the City). 5. The scope of the project required that an Environmental Assessment be prepared. Of various programming alternatives identified and investigated, only one appears to have the potential of helping to implement the development goal while staying within the $150,000 City budget for 1992. This alternative involves scheduling Phase 1 development over two construction seasons. Site preparation would be accomplished in 1992 and retraining Phase I development in 1993 with an additional $50,000 of City funds being budgeted for 1993. This alternative would add an extra Runway 15 threshold relocation to construction staging. This alternative might not, however, meet the federal timetable for special funding if such a program develops. Establishment of an interim local funding program could become necessary to take advantage of special federal funding. Further information concerning changes in costs is included in the attachments which follow. • • Please call us to discuss the project after you have had a chance to review these materials. Thank you. Sincerely, Raym nd M. ege, P.E. Associate Attachments cc w /attachments: JbTi Groehler Sandy DePottey • • TOLT2, KING, DWALL, AN-low ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORJISLD DECEMBER 2, 1991 ENGINEERS- ARCKITECTS- PLANNERS COMMISSION No. 9916 4 1iDER or MA cosT ESTIHA alxrflRT..a>¢eeLSia( ettscxilns�.nurucleei`elaeoRz nUICHiN �4B 1 �' *NN.s%A PAGE l - CONSTRUCTION 70TAL ESTIMATED FEDERAL LOCAL DESLRIM01 - AMDU3{ - AMOUff AMOU N.I LorAL .S.'fA.PF Land Acquisition 5 126,000 5 113,400 $12,600 Wetland Mitigation 76,000 64,800 7,200 Runway 15 -33 Reconstruction i /, 39S,OOp .'39 6ao Extension }107 967,500 aa:;,so { (5Z. 000 Runway Edge Lights - tQRLS 135,000 121,500 13,500 Runway Hold and Taxi Guidance Signs 35,000 31,500 3,500 Runway End Ident. Lights (REILS) 25,000 22,500 2,500 Approach • Slope Indicator Lights (PAPIS) 35,000 31,500 3,500 Pavement Marking 20,000 18,000 2,000 7 Parallel Taxiway 15 -33 643,50071,5 ',{ 7,000 Electrical Distribution Building 12,000 10,800 1,200 Remove /Rein3tall AWOS 10,000 9,000 1,000 Relocate Beacon 10,000 9,000 1,000 Relocate Power Linea -Rwy 33 Approach 50,000 45,000 5,000 1, 7.'0,000 27/, 000 Sub -Total S 2,320,09 $2,088,000. .c- '32960 (39,000 4bo,000 s�,000 Engineering 4 Testing 350,000 315,000 35;9@@ * / /,000 Legal f Administration 30_000 27_000 3.000 31 2OC� 000 329 000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 4arzoe - eBQ $2,430,000 S29@; 006 {SV, 000 • TKDA • TOLTZ. KING OLNALL.ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS PLANNERS �t GQ ,�, Project _ U L A'r.Gfy er `h/. — ++LiT7l/1'.V304 Comm No 1L� Computations for RA/ Cd?4711C,4 IAA PROJECT CO Si E3T /A4A7F A,E O /,vc ecA GRA9ING p,eA --,N ACuF o T7leR ?SW AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK SU I L 0 NG SAINT PAUL MINNESOTA $5101 617'n2 -AA00 Sheet of By (1 Date fL Chka Date X 34/, ooO 6 7 0 00 &.000 /FjP� OF p c CS---A SL • 9&n ArG C,e AGG . 6ASe W cam. s — 64.000 NtT IA/G,er -ASr 390,000 hD0 j7a &, , A - - RoSSiGce SAVING ,e,'o UGF 6, T MAT / � /00 00 ,eUA/ WAY -/- 0 .5z,:? 000 • 7-Ak/WAY 70, 000 � 390,000 ENGINEERING & TESTING COSTS ESTIMATE • HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT February 29, 1992 Design -- Original ceiling amount $189,000 Add'l soil borings 9,500 Add'l engineering 58,500 Construction Engineering Testing 140,000 63,000 TOTAL ENGINEERING & TESTING $460,000 Construction phase services agreement to be negotiated after completion of the design phase. • 0 HUTCHINSON AIRPORT EXPANSION DESIGN BASIC SERVICES ESTIMATE TO COMPLETE 1 Commission No. Fdxuary 29, 1992 To* o...tld. srsu e.,1v a1.a,.1. Tw7•icin hron Fwo"" Py .a Rglq..0 TMIYtl.r E.W ., .Nb Hw. bub. EnuY EnOFI.. IYM MtlYYtl d.IW OrW YHb 01..1 AIRPORTS P4. Bw.r M.k� QH1..a 14r. Ca. Mc Q4etl. Rg1oa:. Tr E Sdvy,�' — (� Tosl mw F. S...cb aR.p9p saesr. Ow "j intlWrp DO.cI Fr Sur�w .E. ftvwk s'Y ',2'2 no 7W o 31, 170.740 . 0 0 s T.r.fS- I.ry +o. M. 4..62 2][ 1.W. a e a l,Yl! 1l,O.ti 11.N] 15.04 a .,m laJ MA2] f2..6p 31.008 o All 00 8.a M 0,dwopow B.rNOn 1m IJT1 T70 Jm all 3, a 63Aa4 IM.IM a 0„ 100) 19.I1e ', lel.m '!}, MAN All s«rc« a' c011.aarl9n. s.mc.. 0 o 0 0 a e - . •- 0 DI 0 01 0 o ToTU 2ER60N -NOI fi M MTES IAOF,RRI TarrA� MlA1iV (gRELT IA" ®TpTµ OVEIME.D TOTAL aLLAHr. (1VERRFAO W�4 Im ',2'2 no 7W o 31, 170.740 MA7. - 9T,K8 T.r.fS- I.ry +o. M. 4..62 2][ 1.W. 13.06I o 3.n2 l,Yl! 1l,O.ti 11.N] 15.04 a .,m laJ MA2] f2..6p 31.008 o "'m ].2N l.m m,lN Ib,ll. 3,2m PAGE 1 I f h , u' I ;IL 0 9.4(18 0 0 170]w of IM174 13.112 170.740 MA7. - 9T,K8 T.r.fS- I.ry +o. M. - 10,408 C.— ro+er _ Soo Ex p.I.ses A.1d'I Tes +:. 9 4tw'n 47,973 Add'1 ��•. sS,so3 I i I 1 f 1 1 e ` s r f. 3 'I i; .f C T :: Mayor and City Council F = - - John P. Rodeberg, Cirector of Engineering FE: Hain Street Alley Construction Project No. 89 -16 Tt:s project was started prior to my starting here, and :ompleted after my arrival. Ken, Gary and I have talked about hcw and if is should be assessed, and why it was constructed from concrete i =s:ead of bituminous. Ap;arently, concrete was utilized d to the la:ut of the alley which made it difficult tc get paving equipment in, the large amount of heavy trucks that utilize the alley, and to prizide for proper drainage in the alley area. My review of the a::ey does indicate that tituminous construction would have been a p:::lem, and would not have been able to address all drainage is c :n :erns. P_r ect Nc. 89 -16 included storm sewer construction, construction b•: Hutchinson Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone, and re: Instruction of the alley between 2nd Avenue SW and 4th Avenue SW list west of Main Street. Attached is my calculation of costs and p ::ential assessments, as veal as related correspondence regarding tte project. Eased on this correspondence, I assume that the City pays for all s: =:m sever, for the difference between concrete and t:tuminous construction, and for that portion of the alley not disturbed by tte Utility and Telephone company construction. The Ut::ity and Telephone companies would presumably pay for a portion of :he alley t_a: they disturbed, or approximately 115 of the cast of a t:::minous alley. Based on these assumptions, the assessa =le cost remaining would be S12.54/front foot. The question then becomes, do we assess all properties, including the residential homes and the ctzrch? Can we show this amount to benefit to the other properties? D_ ve set a precedence if we do not assess a portion of the costs? Tt:s appears to be a difficult situation in which we are not able tc determine a clear answer. Tte staff would appreciate your comments. Please let ■e know if you ha•.e any questions. • c:: Gary Plotz Ken Merrill City Ha" P.r ks & Recreation Po:_-'_-' Department 37 { %.= _ Eton Azt -nue West Harrington St-ret 10 Fr z %_in Street Sou :n (612i ic,-2975 587 -2242 Hit!, :i :swr, Min tie cota 55358 9:3 March 6, 1992 A...M -L.N f 10 it Z J' Y 2' I I I I I 1 VWM" f.q J.N ■mu volley L.N. SECOND .•i b. Fr..IN !alder 0r.F •foci m... Fcr.i.•hl; •.F 0.1 �4 vft r R.1 raw w� 4.frM.fi.. -- — — R-�H- fwn •.r fNr doom, _ 4000b _ s — AVENUE E 6-10 � a F L... ` M-+r.— !.gibe f.FFIF Ill. M W ... Note FN.AI f..i.�. • L.M I LwMI.M if L.fIM MW fs..7F ' THIRD AVENUE S r I l fl f Frl. L.n..« C1. f.. FM Iii 1 7M.. r 1 - - - - - - - - - - - I i F..+. L~oe Cars - - - - - - - - - - - moo .9 r- - - - - - -�►_ 1 ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS rlOJaC! M A S - rsecT AN i A. St , •4, A., Sc. /w:s- s� sass: _ or _ 9 1" I NG NO. to PROJZCT NOW. DAls aZ ST aSSIMAZS FOR ASS ssrwc— t TCAL CONTRACT PQ�Ct { loc ^L+O I [` _ _aa A- C�A tc- Cos 5 Z ro AAA. + /5 31 P -lS -- it =c r a- -� 13 rar�%�� t Y �� t A CSSO 2h s� I c o6- 2E_A;X.Sc . T.. +�aZ' M�'SSC� c•. A FoJ 3,+5 5 - E3 n -/l +c: ►SS�55/°�[J�' •�i� -`� Tt� 8 IR,$ of Soc = 1 .L.5/-/cF 626.Ait S z L ; L. KiA i.K i � ♦ - - ,�' s s A aC ..pi- o (612) 587.5151 cH' CITY Of HUTCHINSON ME110 DATE: September 22, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council PROM: Director of Engineering RE: Letting No. 10 Projeet No. 89 -16 I recommend awarding a contract to Va. Moeller 6 Sons, Inc, in the amount of $65,600.79. This voald be $16,975.00 for the storm sever re- construction south of 2a2 Ave. S.V. in the alley vest of Main STreet and $48,625.70 for the re- surf -ing of the alley between 2nd Ave. S.Y. and 4th Ave. S.V. with a concrete s ace. The resurfacing cost would he paid by the City, Telephone Company and 3ntchins+on Utilities, based on areas disturbed by each for construction of facilities. W oo& o r . tF4�ak Marlow V. Priebe Director of Engineering MVP/PV • • RESO:,^_TION ACCEPTING B= AND AWA.ROTIN; CONTRACT RESOLUTION NO. L.E7TIK NO. 10 PROJECT 10. 89 -16 WHEREAS, pursua to an advertisement for b_ for the improvement of the Alley in Blocks 22 and 32 in South 1/2 City of Hutchinson by construction of Storm Sewer, Surfacing and Appurtenances; bids were received, opened and tabulated according tc law, and the following bids were received complying vith the advertisement: Bider Arun• Bid Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc. S 65,600.70 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Wm. Vueller S Sots, Inc. of Prinsburg, Minnesota, is the lowest res ponsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COC3:IL F= TCHINSON, MINNESOTA: • I. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to eater into the attached contract with Wm. Mue'_:er A Sons, Inc. of Prinsburg, Minnesota, in the name of the City of ?utchirson, for the improvement contained herein„ according to the Pla—s an? Specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file J-- the Office of the City Administrator. 2. The City Adm_nistrator is hereby authorized and directed to return fort'zvith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract. Adopted by the City Council this 26tb day of September, 1989. Mayor City Administrator • _ _ -.. _ 730 a•. (612) 687.6161 F CITY Of HUTCHINSON 37 WASHING TON A VENLE WEST • HUTCHP40N MM 55350 MEKORA10UM :47E: ]�e 6 iggg Mayor 6 City Counci_' ='?1: - Marlon Y-- siebt,_C� �ulca� - ineEr S'-EJECT: jUeY__Stoaa_SrvPrl,,. Yest___ 1Sa1�S =r_ce -Z $e tws u Second and Third Ave=e At the staff meeting held this date on the above- referenced matter, we • corluded that installation of a new line at this time vould be cost ef- fective. The present system is old, sba_av and has tad make -shift type additions over the years. It is a pr zlem in the spring due to freeze c . A_tached is a letter from the Utilities rtlative to work proposed by them. Alm , for your information, is an estimatt for installing the storm sever. See most of the bituminous surface vi'_ be removed for constructiom in t �:-e alley between Second and Fourth Aver, it is rec ®ended we surface sae with concrete and the City pay for tint amount exceeding the cost of bituminous replacement. We request permission to proceed with obtaining bids for a total price. /as • �9, / j • -- 11 yl {o• o0 iYyo �oo X 0. 00 i So.00 J30. 00 Ail. 00 R c P MC! 2 m. a )Z. p i I e js 7, lc 4,.L d a. s So �• I Cd 7 co cd f P" VI /. i yl {o• o0 iYyo �oo X 0. 00 i So.00 J30. 00 Ail. 00 RESOLUTION No. 9672 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION Or REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING MD. 2 77�tk7JP =91. 92-09 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the alleys East of Main Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to Sixth Avenue S.E., and East of Grove Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to Milwaukee Avenue and "Old" Ivy Lane from Sixth Avenue S.E. to Seventh Avenue S.E. by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances; WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HVrCHDLSOH, H32a1ESOTAe THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the • improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator E 9 -/e DATE: March 5th, 1992 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Letting No. 2, Project No. 92 -09 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be held on the 24th day of March, 1992. Project No. 92 -09: Alleys East of Main Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to Sixth Avenue S.W., and East of Grove Street from Fifth Avenue S.W. to Milwaukee Avenue and "Old" Ivy Lane from Sixth Avenue S.E. to Seventh Avenue S.E. by the construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances; Construction Cost S 27.000.00 Engineering /Administration S 4.300.00 Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest S 1.700.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL -------- ----------------- - - - - -- S 33.000.00 Assessable Cost Deferred Assessable Cost City Bonded City Other Funds MSA MNDOT ESTIMATED TOTAL - - - - - - -- JPR /PV S 33.000.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 $ 0.00 S 0.00 ---- -- ------ - - -- - -- S 33,000.00 0 • is 9 K, . RE90LUTION NO. 912 RESOlA1TION RECEIYDNG REPORT AND CALLING HEARDIG ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING No. 2 PROJECT NO. 92-09 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted March 10th, 1992, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of the alleys East of Hain Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to Sixth Avenue S.E., and East of Grove Street from Fifth Avenue S. W. to Hilwuakee Avenue and "Old" Ivy Lane from Sixth Avenue S.E. to Seventh Avenue S.E. by the construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances. Said report was received by the Council on March 10th, 1992. 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $33,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the • 24th day of March, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Hutchinson at 8100 P.H., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9 -K • RESOlirriON ND. 9674 WHEREAS, it is proposed to iaprove First Avenue N.B. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and appurtenances; WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. • Adopted by the Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator 0 071 Q1 I .. DATEt March 5th, 1992 TOt Mayor and City Council FROMt John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering REt Letting No. 4, Project No. 92 -07 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be held on the 24th day of March, 1992. Project No. 92 -07: First Avenue N.E. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and appurtenances; • Construction Cost S 131,150.00 Engineering /Administration S 21,000.00 Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest S 7.850.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ------ ------ ---- -- -- -- --- - - - - -- $ 160,000.00 Assessable Cost S 60,000.00 Deferred Assessable Cost S 0.00 City Bonded S 60,000.00 City Other Funds S 0.00 HSA S 40,000.00 MNDOT $ 0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ------ --- -------------- -- - --- -- S 160,000.00 JPR /PV Is • RESOLUTION 110. 2kD RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMM LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT ND. 92 -07 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted March 10th, 1992, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of First Avenue N.E. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watersain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and appurtenances. Said report was received by the Council on March 10th, 1992. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUT MISON, 1INNESOTAe 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $160,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 24th day of March, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Hutchinson at • 8,00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances; WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, I M /1 L I III I C I THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. • Adopted by the Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 1-M. w i t 4 I :ti 1 1- 1,.tj /`I DATE: March 5th, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FRONT John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Letting No. 6, Project No. 92 -10 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be held on the 24th day of March, 1992. Project No. 92 -10: Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances; • Construction Cost S 311,500.00 Engineering /Administration $ _ 49.840.00 Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest S 18,660.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL -- -- ---- -- ---- --- ------ -- - - - - -- $ ..===.=== 380 &o 00. 00 Assessable Cost S 200,000.00 Deferred Assessable Cost S 0.00 City Bonded $ 100.000.00 City Other Funds $ 80.000.00 MSA $ 0.00 MNDOT $ 0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ----- ------- ------------- - -- - -- S JPR /PV • 9 -M. 1 '• iS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted March 10th, 1992, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the Improvement of Century Avenue from Boston Street to Sunset Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, and appurtenances. Said report was received by the Council on March 10th, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HTPCHI21S0N, MINESOTAe 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $380,000.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 24th day of March, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Hutchinson at • 8 z 00 P.H., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 10th day of March, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • . MINUTES REFUSE CONTRACT COMMITTEE THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 1992 The committee meeting was called to order at 9:30 A.M. The follow- ing were present: Paul L. Ackland, Bob Bowen, Frank Mott, Janis Rannow, Phil Schweizer, Marlin Torgerson, Jack Yates, and Gary D. Plotz. Following discussion, the motion was made by Frank Mott, seconded by Janis Rannow and unanimously carried, to recommend to the City Council that commercial /industrial entities obtain refuse service from the private sector at the earliest date established by the City Attorney /State law. The consensus of the committee was that some minimal licensing of haulers operating a business for profit will be required. The com- mittee will review the McLeod County licensing ordinance. The com- mittee discussed many alternatives regarding organized residential refuse collection. The committee preferred having only one hauler for the entire city and a contract of an approximate three -year term. Additional requirements included having a local telephone number or 800 number or a FAX number for any residential contractor • and also that the residential contract be awarded 60 -90 days before start of service to facilitate purchasing any equipment, if needed. The committee discussed having three sizes of containers of 30, 60 and 90 gallons and continuing the reduced senior citizens reduced refuse rate, possibly with a revised formula. Discussion was centered around the definition of a commercial versus residential entity. In conclusion, it was decided to have City staff survey the following items: 1. Definition of commercial versus residential 2. Container sizes /prices 3. Length of contract 4. Sample licensing ordinances 5. Summer curb -side service and winter garage pickup service 6. Methods or credits to encourage residential recycling 7. Commercial /industrial tax credits /tax abatements to encourage recycling • The committee agreed to meet again on March 19, 1992 at 9:30 A.M. in City Hall. The meeting adjourned. 9 -/V REFUSE CONTRACT COMMITTEE • Paul L. Ackland 626 Bluff Street Home: 587 -6230 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Work: 587 -7210 Bob Bowen 216 Fifth Ave. N.E. Home: 587 -2750 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Work: Retired Francis •Frank" Mott 423 School Road N. Home: 587 -0814 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Work: 234 -4000 Janis Rannow (Mrs. Mark Schramm) 908 Second Ave. S.W. Home: 587 -9236 P.O. Box 443 Work: 587 -3884 Hutchinson, MN 55350 • Phil Schweizer McLeod Landfill Inc. Route 3, Box 70A Work: 864 -5503 Hwy. 22 i County Road 71 Glencoe, MN 55336 Marlin Torgerson 1245 Rolling Oaks Lane Home: 587 -3243 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Work: 587 -3072 John "Jack" Yates 67799 CSAH 18 Home: 587 -7652 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Work: 587 -3797 Appointed 2 -13 -92 • • REFUSE CONTRACT COMMITTEE I. Having the comnercial /industrial entities obtain service directly from the private sector, as soon as possible? (Note contract expires July 1, 1992) II. If so, licensing of haulers? 11inimum requirement (ie. county ordinance licensing plan) III. Organized Residential Collection 1. State L' - 6 month notice on any change in provider - resolution and public hearing needed 2. Type of Organized Collection A. Must be volume based - State Law B. Refuse hauler and recycler should be the same entity - county's desire C. City could have more than one hauler, if town was divided in sections (ie. 1.lillnar) - discuss advantages and disadvantages . D. City or hauler directly pays landfill; advantages and disadvantages E. Garage or curbside pickup service - city survey shows citizens want garage service F. White goods for residential - exclusive or non- exclusive; FREE pick -up day periodically G. Leaf pickup - change in State Law January 1, 1992 H. Hazardous Haste - paint, tires, etc. (check with county) 3. Volume Based Refuse A. Size /ownership container (ie. 30, 64, 90 gallon - Glencoe estimates $10, 12.50, 14.00 /mo.) B. Changing size of container - 30 day window, $10 thereafter - Glencoe example C. Impact of residential trash compact - rs? • D. Sleight l mitat'on on 30 g container; other sizes weight restrictions? 9_N 4. Other Residential Contract Considerations • A. 3, 4, 5 years? B. Ilutual options to review? C. Escalation of land fill charges; pass thru of costs - formula (unless city pays landfill directly) U. Responsibility for billing (city vs. hauler) E. Hobile home parks - residential or commercial F. Itulti- family apartments - residential or commercial- G. Cast -of- living clause? 5. City staff to do survey; key items that the committee desires information on (probably telephone survey) 6. Set time for next meeting. 9 LA C March 6, 1992 MEMO TO: MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY PLOTZ. CITY ADMINISTRATOR 6 KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1992 BUDGET SHORTFALL As we all are aware the State of Minnesota revenue forecast are showing another major revenue shortfall. The numbers being discussed are over $500,000,000 and discussion of cuts necessary or taxes increased are prevalent. It would appear Hutchinson as well as other cities, schools, counties, and state agencies are headed for cuts again this year. • We have read of percentages of over 7 percent of all agencies to make up this revenue shortfall. Our General Fund budget calls for local government aids of $1.032,179 for 1992. A 7 percent cut would equal $72,000. The cut could also apply to HACA and disparity aids for 1992. According to a report received from the State of Minnesota in 1991 we were programmed to receive $1,105,100. A 7 percent reduction of this would equal $77,000. If the cut is applied to HACA and equalization aid the revenue loss would affect our debt service funds. In addition the city budget anticipated $65,000 to be received from McLeod County for dispatch operations. This matter has yet to be resolved. It all adds up to potentially large deficit for 1992. The amount of deficit will be unknown until probably late April, May or possibly June. A situation which would give us a lot of problems if the city would wait 6 months into the budget. We would recommend to the city council the following: 1. Freeze all capital purchases with an exception being given for budgeted computers and SCBA updates. (The computer purchases will help office efficiency and help in time completion of scheduled projects.) we would review with the City Council if • capitals purchases involve life and safety needs. City Nall Parks & Recreation Police Department 371Nashington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 CJ - Printed on mcwled pap" - 2. Put in place a freeze of all new programmed personnel in our General Fund Budget. 3. Direct all personnel to review all expenditures and delay all purchases which are non essential. 4. Directors are to prepare list of potential cuts in each budget and submit to city administrator. These above action would also be working with current action of no action of annual wage adjustment until legislative session ends. We would also add to this the merit adjustments for individual employees - including police officer longevity pay, and fire personnel adjustments. • • THE EVLRES f GROUP LTD March 10, 1992 Gary D. Plotz City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 By Facgim'lle 1 -234 - 4240 Re: Extension of Time for city Election on Liquor Store Lease Dear Gary: This letter will serve to confirm our recent discussion concerning the noted matter. I have confirmed with Doug Driscoll that Erickson's Diversified Corporation is willing to extend the time period for city election as to the liquor store lease covered in Article 10 of the Development Agreement. On that basis, this letter will serve to extend the election date from March 23rd to A ril s 92 if there are questions cnnnarnina a oreaoinc: or if something further is required, please feel free to call. Best regards, THE EVEREST GROUP, LTD. 9 C. William Franke President cc: Doug Driscoll Greg Erickson CWF /jk e , 1 6 2f �5 Loce Lakc Road P.O. Ec* .3U19U - Ro5C�Ec, b1N $5113 w1, Ti'.'ial PGi =F P �a: r PROPOSALS FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW OF CATV SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA Proposals for the technical review of the CATV system for the City of Hutchinson were submitted by three firms: Weaver & Associates, Inc. of Minneapolis Owl Engineering, Inc. of St. Paul Gossman Communications of Rochester The HCVN Technical Proposal Review Committee, consisting of Mark Guggemos, Neil Sideen, and Sue Potter, met on Thursday, March 5, 1992 to review the three proposals. The committee members examined the proposals individually prior to the group meeting. Each had eliminated Weaver & Associates prior to the meeting due to its incomplete and "haphazard" response to the methodology question. With two proposals remaining, a decision was arrived at by listing responses to RFP items three through six and their subheadings. The committee members graded the RFP response on a scale of one to five, with high marks favorable. Owl and Gossman RFPs were professional and thorough, with only nine • points dividing the two. Gossman prevailed on items three through six with 104 points. Gossman's fee is "not to exceed" $5,186 for a proposed 66 hours of work. Owl's fee is "not to exceed" $5,150 for a proposed 58 hours of work. The committee felt that Owl's credentials were excellent, however, his experience, training, and references were mainly in the radio/ broadcast technology. Gossman's credentials, on the other hand, were firmly in the television design, construction and analysis field. The committee recommended that in addition to the items on the RFP, we definitely want every trunk termination checked, due to the manner in which the system was built. This may require negotiating away another item on the RFP to stay in budget. The unanimous decision was for Gossman Communications. (A copy of the committee review form is available on request.) • io -4 , REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING WATER & SEWER FUND MARCH 10, 1992 TOTAL $108,579.39 / /� *PERA employer contribution 454.45 *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 774.94 *US Postmaster water bills 246.34 American Payment Center 3 months rent 64.00 Big Bear hammer 4.99 Brinkman prints 4.44 Citizens Bank savings bonds 250.00 City of Hutch March medical 2,883.07 City of Hutch March dental 337.81 Coast to Coast supplies 228.26 Crow Chemical towels 27.35 Datastream support renewal 1,250.00 DPC chlorine 618.10 DPC chlorine & dioxide 642.70 Electric Motor bearings 32.00 Family Rexall film & lead 4.80 Farm & Home parts 18.04 Feed Rite ejector 150.56 First Trust Center paying agent fees 646.25 Fischer & Porter contract 1,640.00 Fisher Scientific ribbons 72.68 • Fitzloff Hardware Floor Care nut driver cleaner 8.08 38.00 Fortis Benefits March LTD ins 116.44 G & K uniforms 162.04 Goodall aluminum 64.76 Gopher State One Call Feb service 10.00 Hach lab supplies 160.45 Hutch Cenex fuel 349.11 Hutch Com Hospital back education 35.00 Hutch Fire & Safety inspections 84.70 Hutch Iron & Metal iron 7.21 Hutch Leader ads 132.40 Hutch Telephone phone service 378.78 Hutch Utilities electricity & gas 15,655.27 Isco lab supplies 450.39 Jerabek Machine stem 36.00 Junker Feb refuse 58,887.84 Logis Jan & Feb computer 16,039.13 MN Dept Health reg- S.Hanson 70.00 MN Dept Revenue Feb sales tax 4,028.18 MN Mutual Life March life 49.14 MN Valley Testing testing 282.00 North Central Lab lab supplies 188.73 Quade Electric bulbs 133.60 Sears vacuum 179.99 • Thunderbird Hotel Tri County Water loding -Lanz & DeVries salt 248.00 17.60 US Postmaster meter postage 125.97 VWR Scientific lab supplies 183.71 Water Products u?�grades 93.89 Zee Medical safety supplies 12.20 TOTAL $108,579.39 / /� CENTRAL GARAGE FUND Brandon Tire rotate tires 64.00 *PERA employer contribution 59.96 *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 102.39 Brandon Tire tires 2,579.00 Carquest supplies 857.02 Champion Auto supplies 191.22 City of Hutch March dental 43.79 City of Hutch March medical 345.67 Coast to Coast supplies 14.90 Farm & Home bits 1.99 Fortis Benefits March LTD ins 13.53 G & K uniforms 53.64 Harpel Bros brake booster 403.84 Hutch Cenex tires 272.05 Hutch Fire & Safety kits 97.50 Hutch Wholesale supplies 269.68 Jerabek Machine cable 71.07 MN Mutual Life Ins March life ins 5.67 Plaza Hardware bolts 0.50 Pro Auto Clean clean car 55.00 Schmeling oil oil 58.00 Shoe Inn recover seat 30.00 US Postmaster meter postage 7.83 Wigen Motor 2 paint jobs 2,415.90 r1 1.J GENERAL FUND TOTAL $7,950.15 1991 Brandon Tire rotate tires 64.00 Jerabek Machine iron 8.56 Nicklasson Athletic nets 339.00 1992 *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 4,494.77 *US Postmaster March newsletter 209.22 *DNR registration fees 53.00 *DNR registration fees 271.00 *Dakota Rail option to purchase 500.00 *Withhold Tax Acct federal excise tax 22.43 *PERA employer contribution 5,455.34 *PERA -DCP employer contribution 28.71 *Infosource seminar on a disks 165.40 *DNR registration fees 271.00 *Gallivans 33 dinners 399.30 Ackland, Paul per diem 510.00 Albrecht,K.& R.Larson housing rehab 6,593.00 Albreht,K.& A'C Siding housing rehab 1,385.00 Allen Office tabs 9.55 Becker Arena • facing 345.00 Bennett service contracts & toner 357.27 Big Bear welding rods 13.47 Brandon Tire patch tires 16.00 Bus Records Corp mtce agreement: 325.00 Buytaert, Patricia costumes 1'8.00 Camera Shop Carguest Cash Wise Century Labs • • Coast to Coast Colorado Time Syst County Market County Treasurer Craig, Tom Crow River Vet Culligan Curtis Ind Dennison, Steve Ericksons More4 Family Rexall Family Rexall City Eng Assc City of Hutch City of Hutch Chamber of Commerce Farm & Home Farm & Home Faye & Dave's Upholstery Fidelity Fiedler, Rich Fitzloff Hardware Fitzloff Hardware Floor Care Floor Care Fogg, Mike Fortis Benefits G & K Gall's Glencoe Uniforms Gov Training Sery Great Plains Greenbriar Floral Grina, Lisa Hager Jewelry Hammond, Michelle Henry's Foods Home Bakery Huhn, Larry Hutch Cenex Hutch Fire Hutch Hutch Hutch Telephone Hutch Telephone Hutch Utilities Hutch Wholesale Hutch Wholesale ISIA Jerabek Machine K Mart Karg, Larry Klabunde, Cory & Safety Iron & Metal Leader film & prints cleaner groceries cleaners March rent dues March medical March dental supplies rotors groceries DL fees broomball worker boarding service & salt fasteners basketball official groceries photos supplies supplies bulbs & hammer recover seat plans & boxes basketball official supplies supplies supplies cleaners basketball official March LTD uniforms stacking system caps reg- C.Gruett lumber plants -Moon & Lipke film & tape locker plates training supplies muffins mileage fuel extinguisher recharges iron ads, cup & public hrg directory changes phone service electricity & gas supplies supplies ribbons iron cutter & prestone conferenc- expenses basketball official 30.04 2.16 188.57 237.00 403.39 40.00 22,593.72 2,724.37 203.68 40.00 43.83 118.00 17.50 234.05 22.40 253.55 18.00 27.14 62.68 64.34 139.86 6.29 30.00 86.77 72.00 18.65 156.60 882.84 85.17 180.00 982.16 524.72 86.44 7.95 75.00 99.35 30.95 24.07 16.00 10.00 218.53 8.40 83.16 2,156.96 36.70 39.71 552.53 524.00 3,200.45 3,217.41 38.89 12.74 76.91 26.08 10.99 310.74 270.00 Kustom Signals mount & cable 67.00 L & P Supply pruner & supplies 1,037.16 • Larson, Quentin class expenses 48.51 Laser Sales chisel & grind wheel 78.45 Lasting Woodlands dues 10.00 Lee Collins lettering tape 82.55 Lean March service 288.00 Linder, Paul basketball official 324.00 Logis Jan & Feb computer 27,385.90 Mankato Mobile Radio batteries & mic 123.82 Marco repair 95.38 McCarthy,S & AB Electric housing rehab 88.61 McCarthy,S.& M.Rick Plbg housing rehab 422.00 McCarthy,S.& UBC housing rehab 174.98 McGarvey Coffee coffee 54.90 McNeilus Steel steel 370.97 MN Elevator elevator service 61.00 MN Mayors Assc dues 10.00 MN Mutual Life Ins March life ins 410.13 Moon, Dolf meeting expenses 12.80 Mr. Movies Sr rental 3.25 MSF tournament entries 160.00 Nelson,D.& City Hutch housing rehab 79.22 Nelson,D.& G.Holtz Co. housing rehab 2,493.00 Nelson,D.& Landers Elec housing rehab 1,000.00 Nicklasson, Nancy skating refund 12.00 • Nicklasson Athletic Northern States Supply net tighteners parts 104.25 68.32 Olsons Locksmith repin locks 339.50 Plaza Hardware supplies 82.26 Potentials Dev books 72.70 Quade Electric bulbs 13.50 Quality Car Wash bus washes 12.50 Rodeberg, John meeting expenses 15.72 Rutz Plumbing repair stool 53.65 R.C. Davis patching material 105.12 Schmeling Oil kerosene 148.09 Secretarian services- M.Swanson 476.00 Security State Bank payment 231.80 Shoutz, Mark K -9 supplies 35.23 Smith, Les tour refund 77.00 Sorensen Farm blades 15.70 Specified Mech Syst igniter 80.00 Standard Printing rack & cartridge 52.80 Star Cablevision March service 3.83 Streichers light kits 173.54 Templeton employer contribution 194.68 TKDA professional services 3,692.15 U of M reg- C.Wedin 25.00 UBC lumber & supplies 731.76 Underground Grill meeting lunch 23.08 US Postmaster meter postage 604.85 • VFW Post 906 Sr. dinner 919.50 Winn,L.& Landers Elec housing rehab 750.10 Xerox contract payment 329.80 TOTAL $107,983.42 L J • BOND FUNDS 12P4.4m �. General Safety Equip Coast to Coast Hutch Wholesale Hutch Iron & Metal Hutch Cenex truck chassis chains & keys filter iron fuel TOTAL 100,000.00 8.13 5.40 14.28 30.84 $100,058.65 YOUTH CENTER *Withhold Tax Acct *PERA *Scott Wakefield City of Hutch City of Hutch Coast to Coast Fortis Benefits Hutch Telephone MN Mutual Life Plaza Hardware Quade Electric Radio Shack Todd Tepley US Postmaster US Toy Co. BONDS OF 1991 CONSTRUCTION Wm Mueller employer contribution employer contribution March rent March medical March dental outlet center March LTD phone service March life ins supplies bulbs batteries DJ Show meter postage supplies TOTAL letting #4 Doherty & Barefeet Carpet HCDC loan Doherty & Great Plains HCDC loan HOSPIT BONDS Am National Bank TOTAL principal & interest American Nat'l Bank principal & interest • 1982 TAX INC DEBT SERV Nat'l City Bank principal & interest 65.91 38.60 750.00 154.46 15.64 4.86 11.10 20.25 4.62 29.81 3.95 16.95 200.00 4.35 33.15 $1,353.65 3,091.28 682.06 1,817.51 $2,499.57 83,713.75 40,543.75 19,246.25 • • • 1985 TAX INC DEBT -SERV First Trust Center paying agent fees 646.25 BONDS OF 1985 First Trust Center paying agent fees 658.75 BONDS OF 1989 DEBT SERV American Nat'l Bank paying agent fees 246.22 FIRE HALL DEBT SERV American Nat'l Bank paying agent fees 253.66 1992 TAX INC CONST Farm Service partial payment on purchase 10,000.00 Larson Engineering bldg inspection 750.00 Brinkman's film 12.59 TOTAL $10,762.59 BONDS OF 1990 CONSTR Don Gilbertson reimbursement 325.00 1990 TAX INC CONS Hutch Utilities elec for test bldg 121.98 LIOUOR FUND Bernicks Pepsi pop 16.80 City of Hutch lottery sales 563.00 City of Hutch lottery sales 452.00 City of Hutch employee insurance 1,220.94 City of Hutch payroll 3,722.48 Ed Phillips wine & liquor 8,684.74 Griggs Cooper wine & liquor 7,717.44 Hutch Utilities elec & gas 509.10 Johnson Bros wine & liquor 12,250.08 Lenneman beer 9,292.95 MN Sheriff advertising 27.00 PERA employer contribution 152.56 Quality Wines wine & liquor 3,362.93 Triple G beer 17,231.20 Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 276.23 TOTAL 765,479.45 COMMI! OF EXBCUTtVE DIRECTOR PIiDGRAM STAFF Charter Wamcr ugene Hlppe COM.MUNI7Y DEVELOPMENT Chairman ry Donn Wlrx�kler Mriifrrd Fierrdric ,{� GeraldGtinde rice n UU ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN r Cadwyn Kegy �' Lee Larson Secretary ra \ p� : SWAL L BLS. DEV. CFJM t - Greg Bergman [� . AREA AGE ON A L,orralne P aron atWn F7ANCE (� Kay Ruff) MM `Y C4567g .9 O N a REGMED p � U A TO: Reg Si-x East City Cler 6; y R MUM: Lee Larso Econo lopment Specialist S�'r'Z221Z�� R3: 1990 Census Enclosed is a summary of the 1990 Census of Population and Bossing fen your city. The data is taken fx� Summary Tape File 1a (STF 1A). She information on STY 1A is Mailed further i 81 additional tables, 29 an population (page 1) and 52 an housing (page 2). Additional census info wi11 soon be released on Summary Tape FLIe 3A (SSP 3A). 1 have enclosed a page that briefly s that data. 'ilea S77 3A is released, we grill send each of yac a summary. A11 the data mentioned ahoae is available for each county, city and township is Minnesota and is available from our offi=s. Pease share this info =co with the city council, planning commission, economic development board or scbool officia.s. Cactact our =ffice for ya census or other data needs. We are an affiliate of the State eta Caster. :f we do not have it, we will find it for gout 0 Enclosure 333 W 6TH ST . WILLMUt WN 56201 • TELE.PHON'E 6(2/235 -8504 . TOLL FREE I- SM45OS608 • FAX 612/235,4329 MID- MINNESOTA DIf►>P1.OPMENT COKMISSION 333 We7f Sixth Street 'Willmar, Minnesota 46201 1990 Census of F-: _ -ation and Housing Page 1 040 Minnesota 050 McLeod - c.;nty 060 Hntc=- =sod. cit; Total popua-- on .............................. ............... 11,523 SEX Male .............................. ............................... 5,615 Fem ale ............................ ............................... 5,908 AGE Under 5 years .... ............................... ............... 1,080 5 to 1; years ..................... ............................... 2,280 18 to 20 years .................. ............................... . 424 21 to 24 years .................... ............................... 671 25 to 44 years .................... ............................... 3,741 45 to 54 years .................... ............................... 946 55 to 59 year .r. ... ............................... ............... 356 60 to 64 years .... ............................... ............... 409 65 to 74 years ....................... ........... ................ 808 75 to 84 years ................ ... ............................... 564 85 years an-2 _ er ............................... ....... I ... ... 244 Medianage ........ ............................... ............... 30.9 Under 18 years ....................... ............................... 3,360 Percent of tnta= population ...................... 65 years and over ....... ............ .........................I..... 1,616 Percent of total population ....... ............................... 14.0 HOU'SE14OLDS BY :1'F-_ Total households ..................... ............................... 4,483 Family househo_ds (families) ............ ......................... 3,035 Married- cou ; - - families ........ ............................... 2,570 Percent c` total households . ............................... 57.3 Other farm'_:, male householder . ............................... 106 Other fari - . fe :ale householder .............................. 359 eonfaa_ly hcu e--___ .............. ............................... 1,448 Percent _` _:tal households . ............................... 32.3 Households- _ -z -ng alone ....... ............................... 1, Housei•c__ =- f- years and over ............... ............... X45 " Persons liv_ns -_ - ._usehclds .................... ............... 11,357 Personsper h_ --=-- -d ............................ ............... 2.53 GROUP QUARTERS Persons living _.. group quarters .. ............................... 166 Institutionalized persons ...... ............................... 142 Other persons in group quarters ............................... 24 RACE AND HISPANIC _= IGI\ i khite ............................. ............................... 11,359 Black ............................. ............................... 20 Percent of t_-al population .... ............................... 0.2 American Indiz , Eskimo, or Aleut . ............................... 19 Percent of --:al population .... ............................... 0.2 Asian or Pacif -- Islander ........................ ............... 71 Percentcf - = -a1 population ................. ............... 0.6 Otherr ace ........................ ............................... 54 Hisparic orig-- %of any race) .................... ............... i.44 Percent of - = -a1 population ................... ............... 0.9 MID ' DEVELOPMENT COM;�IISSION 333 West Sixth Street R'iilm2r, Nlinnesoto 56201 :5:0 Census of %Pula -ion and 040 Minnesota 050 McLeod County 060 Hutchinson city ?age - Total housing units ............ ............................... 4,764 „ __ ,. PANCT AND TENURE O ccupied housing units ............ ............................... 4,483 Owner o---c-.:pied ................. ............................... 3,023 Percen_ owner occupied ...... ............................... 67.4 Renter occupied ................ ............................... 1,460 V acant housing units ............................................. 281 For seasonal, recreational, -r occasions: use ................. 8 H omeowner vacancy rate (percent ... ............................... 1.5 Rental cacanc. rate ( percent) ...... ............................... 9.2 Persons per c—ner- occupied uni: ... ............................... 2.81 Persons per renter - occupied un: t .. ............................... 1.96 U nits with orer I person per rycm . ............................... 57 i3 "TS IN STRUCTRE 1 -unit, detached .................. ............................... 2,743 1 -unit, att ached .................. ............................... 195 2 to 4 units ..................................................... .............. 456 5 to 9 unit_ ...................... ............................... 158 10 or more units .................. ............................... 853 Mobile home, trailer, other ....... ............................... 359 Vs_UE Specified owner- occupied units .... ............................... 2,521 Less than S50, ODD .............. ............................... 544 $50,000 t= $99, 000 ............. ............................... 1,753 $100,000 to $149, 000 ........... ............................... 178 $150,000 no $199, 999 ........... ............................... 43 $200,000 to $295, 999 ........... ............................... 9 $300,000 :r more ............... ............................... 1 Median (d-: Tars .......... ............................... .... 5=,900 ;TRACT RENT Specified renter- occupied uni: =_ ;aying cash ren * ................. 1,436 Lessthaw 5250 ................. ............................... 446 $250 to E ................... ............................... 959 5500 to E ................... ............................... )8 $750 to Ec99 ................... ............................... 1 $1,000 or more ................................................ 2 Median ( dollars) ............... ............................... 310 si :E AND HISPkKC ORIGIN OF HOUS1•<= =DER Occupied housing units .................. ......................... 4,483 white .......................... ............................... 4,434 Black.......................... ............................... 4 Percent of occupied unit=_ ... ............................... 0.1 A merican Indian, Eskimo, or A' eut ............................. 5 Percent of occupied unit=_ ... ............................... 0.1 Asian or Facific Islander ...... ............................... 25 Perce^_ of occupied uni'= ... ............................... 0.6 Other ...................... ............................... 15 Hispanic crigin (of any rac= .. ............................... 28 P ercen_ of occupied ur. i--_ ... ............................... 0.6 It D_ In -i ,nul_ ,• i • 11 to 90 Froducu* Subject Items M&xW in the 1990 C=M of Population MW HWS*q ' I Oaptrce t CaoponMO Household mWimsWp S TF 1 4 � Age Marital suns Hispanic origin Number of units in grucam Dumber of rooms in unit Tmure (owned or reed) Vihs or home or mo thly rem paid Cote housing (meals inch rded in rem) Vacanc r1mracteris ics .y C Sample Component* Social d ra aristim r . y , 1 .. 1 . _ M _ � 1 . I I � • � • 1. 11 .11. 1 1 . YI _ F..• •111.' ,I 1 f.l 111 1 1 � DmWfi=dr1q9ODw a dCaaasad2enedai- 40*0mb r irw dw 21w mnay RE4 detiW a WWy afPv&AM m jrps dar weeds m iv abe v as ion�aaf0� b t# rrporrt arodE 99 m p�a�d anda:pn&W�� 1 ,F1ar Wd imm cr nun ia% cmena tar ojctr +I tw+d af= a Star dwa mw or dw GmW Bamr S Dva Utd Sy pm amaaaa Cjmvww Saw m man, DC WM OO11X3 -41OW E *g = MD t =npx n mbea item appear m me stmt atd b,g loran am are wined fraw all Pests and hom a sa UOC otte'ra P =boo ite m (x* m dw b% bum or ssrgie que�awmm and are miecled Lampe of apprumately one m m houmV 6 • yym E.,naoLD YIT D. ECDONELL ILEOEIP L,IfDEHS� @ EIYES ,lDEEBCEf • fTL�'mP I- 000E L,CL I. lYSff.ARD D. DOPE � Y. T,lEYER DES rnuT vw , B -YcoEI moray �. TAr,RSa �r I. OOEEOCIs C, RB D. EEBER • E March 6, 3992 ARwol.D & McDowEi.L A`roa. - Ers AT L,&w 101 P_LRX Puca Hvm YLSiL3UTA s535o -2363 1612 587-7373 IAI < 901 -, ■ESIDQi ,TID1Yir ZD j ,` `' or DoasasL fI T— �. UI[EBOR E,TY�D C ...... MR PAr E. BEMCB , ,. rc R_ EMJCBAEL" .e CE@�� LAtE ROAD ]�P[rili,lfD�R680'i� 1'fYH �6 @�S,S - 9000 ]6 ]OLL T6E BOO- 3,3 -4St5 rz (as) w -rsac+ 9 90=1 MD 9TEEEr r®ca�DS. IfAEI90t 533'�l r,z (azl 309 -9eoe Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West FOR YOUR INFORMATION Hutchinscs, Mn. 55350 Re: Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment - Phase I our File No. 3244 -89031 Dear Gary: Acting at the direction of the Hutchinson City Counci I wrote to Mark Nelson at Shopko on the issue of the parking sit=.ation at the Shopko sire. A copy of that le =ter is enclosed with this corres- pondence. I spoke tc Mr. Nelson on Friday, March 6, 1992. Shopko was in agreement with the proposal made should be no Further diffi =ult: on this point. a number of details that will reed to be worked easement agreement, but I am sa_isfied that no be preset -:,ed. He advised me that by the City and there Obvio = sly, there are out ii the cross further problems should Also enclosed is a copy `,r my = =rrespondence to bill Franke at Ever- est relating to Phase II issues. All these items should be included in this weeks council packet as "for your information" topics. Thank you. Very G. Barry Anderson GBA: mb•csa .s . cinL rm..; srECL.��- Er reE m� - rsax+ sr� a.E .s sam�cr, oR cc: Ma= � 1V C 1 1� YLS P80P£E'T JK' 5PD--aIS9'L By BAR L,POCLTiT Best regards. 4 R D+Tm a. aaotn OaRT �. RCDORE4 srETU a. aED®oN O. Raaaf• aRDEDON' 6TRT� s. noon uDRa E. IRm.aED DaTID � DRCnDE NaNl Tam. D. DOCE" Jo K. PAMI E Ja DrLEr RD O. ECORR W. TAT Kl ART a. soaaEa CarQlN D- RERER ARN & MCDOwE ATT oRN - EYS AT Lew or c SEL �Am M. CARE RON Ra OND C. zz PAM K. 0301CR � S R. Ca RN1c9 -, • March 6, 1992 101 PARK P ca HE=EtrNSON, XI , E90TJ 55330-2563 (612) 567 -7573 FAX 1s ) 567� REStDR]C, aTasRalr O. a a� 5s CEDAR LEE ROaa YINNL,OIJS, alNNE60Ta ]626 (s ) Sae -9000 lD1 a TREE 600 - 661-46 Tai(612)565-1793 Sol soars ToDara sraar TRnrE�am, NIENE/02a SS1n 16191 �6R -s91{ raz fa191 a69 - 5506 William Franke Everest Development, Ltd. P.O. Box 13292 Roseville, MN 55113 Re: Cross Easement Agreement and Related Issues Our File No. 3244 -91046 Dear Bill: FOR YOUR INFORMATION I write to you today regarding the cross easement issue. I spoke with Mark Nelson at Shopko on Friday, March 6, 1992. As you may recall, there was discussion regarding the use of restrictions on both the Shopko and grocery sites. Mr. Nelson has advised me that those restrictions are unnecessary, the cross easement agreement is a 'dead letter,' and there will not need to be any restrictions on either site. • This matter is now resolved. I will be preparing a formal termination of cross easement agreement document between the City and Shopko, but I probably will not prepare that document until we know whether or not a similar document will be required for the building, as yet unidenti- fied, that will be constructed on the City owned property next to Shopko. If the City builds a non - liquor store, or allows a non - liquor store to be constructed on that site, then there will need to be an agreement between the City and Shopko on some issues. I believe the City and Shopko have reached agreement on all significant points, but there are a number of details to be worked out yet. Thank you for your cooperation regarding these issues. Best regards. Very truly yours, • ARNOLD S MaNdarv G. Barry $ a r S 6TECUCaRr sT TEE ,n� ffz r saR .mocl� GB" mb 'CERTMXD as a Rau. TROPERT u+. 6 PRCI.1 R raE ImITBOV sera M&N .•—`r OX cc: Mark Nelson • NAB E. A�--- OAST O. NC� - ErE.v •. AE76M� 0. WR AS>1mON' SI ZI S. s1O0t L K. PaTSAED N V= A. NMMOUENASt PAM U. DOWS" �N M. PSIDIpIT IAML Vfi.ttf aZLID O. lAmtt TLMOINT .,. s►alat )•AR X. H000c :a � D. MQSa AR-w oLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAM 101 P AYE PLACE ffczcalxsoN, MuwxEsoTA 5733o -2563 OF COUt m to OND C. LU.ua PAUL M. EEOICA CH Ra A. uE IctAzL (612)587 -7575 PAIL (a J "7 -� MOIDtR ATLOIQEi O. EAYtT ANDENEOM SaN CEDAM LAMB MOAN mMSArouS. NllMtsOL sot (w) E45-90Do LO TOLL PMtt MOO- a41-ee PAZ(ew)sA -ITSm m SOUTH POUWN RMMQ !@CWrow. MINSOMTA 'mTl - (Em) mao- February 4, 1992 P� Iwo m - Sm FOR YOUR INFORMATION Mr. Mark Nelson X2 i FShopko Stores, Inc. 5z 'z;. P.O. Box 19060 ti M QR)c. Green Bay, Wisconsin 54307 -9060 a Re: ShopKo/Hutchins r n Downtown Redevelopment Project �' Our File So. 3244- 890031 Dear Hark: This letter agreement will serve as a framework for the more formal • Cross Easement and Supplemental Agreement to be prepared at a later date by counsel for the respective parties. It is my understanding that the City of Hutchinson and ShopKo Stores, Inc. have agreed to the following relative to the downtown redevelopment project: 1. Cross Easement Aareement. A modified and revised Cross Easement Agreement will be entered into between the City of Hutchinson and ShopKo Stores, Inc. The use restrictions found in the Cross Easement Agreement attached to the Site Purchase Agreement as an exhibit will be retained in the new Cross Easement Agreement, which will cover Lots 1 and 2• of Block 1 of the Hutchinscr Downtown Redevelopment Plat. The new Cross Easement Agreement will also address parking issues, signage and similar concerns. 2. Parkina. ShopKo is the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment Plat. The City has retained ownership of Lot 2, Block 1, Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment Plat, and is contemplating the possibility of construction on the site. The City will need approximately So parking spaces for its development and ShopKo agrees that these parking spaces will I come from the common parking area to the west of the combined building. The City shall not require a variance for the • parking presently contemplated by ShopKo and ShopKo shall not object to nor require a variance for, the parking contemplated for the City structure. - CtMTV[tn At A C� R THE NDOmOTA RATt YM Y10CIA3IQL 'CEtTU = Aa A 2 TSplt LAW SPECIALIST EY TNt MMH & STAT[ EAS ASSOCIATION Mr. Mark Nelson February 4, 1992 Page 2 3. BaildLM Con openings on contemplated rated doors. the north si at least 60 structure. struction. The ShopKo building shall have no the south wall and the two doors presently in the existing plans shall be 45 minute fire The City structure shall have no openings on le of the building and both buildings shall have feet of clear space surrounding the combined 14. Present Cross Easement Agreement The present Cross Easement Agreement shall be of no further force and effect. ShopKo acknowledges that the City is proceeding ahead with redevelopment plans across First Avenue which will involve the construction of a new grocery store and pharmacy. Both parties agree that the Cross Easement Agreement shall not be binding nor have any effect on the proposed development. • Please do not hesitate to contact me sbould you have any questions in connection with this letter agreement. I have provided a space for your signature at the bottom and I would ask that you sign it • and return it to me via fax and by regular mail. Thank you. Best regards. very truly yours, GBA:lm CC Gary Plotz Paul Ackland Jim Marka John Bernhagen Co®cil Members Approved as to content and form: Mark Nelson ShopEo Stores, Inc. • ARxol.D & McDowEli. ATToax AT lax lot Pe>s P ucz HUTCHINSCM. M INRS.SOTJ 55350 -2363 (612) 587 -7575 PAI (SIS) � -� >�Tnncr .rmasz 6 DAlYT LlDCDlm1 C7v k4I1) 7532 ti RFXZ NED m N N g} Mr. Gary D. Plotz te City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Environmental Issues - Phase II Our File Ho. 3244 -91046 DODti6 i1LLL1 W. C.viJ� LTD C. LALLII! PAT1 Y. DIDICD xd c�.s £Asa eo.D �AP018. YDi!!<SOTA 'sY! (Q xs -s000 v zou. esa eoo -w -dQ lAZ (tY) 5 �S -I19J S4 90II]Z POU4TH lTZSa PDIFCE'l�.. ][ilflflOaTA STII PAI Imo) 3!Y -SS96 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Dear Gary: I am enclosing herewith a copy of correspondence received from Twin City Testing Corporation and material enclosed with that correspondence. Please provide this information to the City Council in the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting packet. I have orally advised Ericksons and Everest that no further testing is recommended. I hope by the tine of our next meeting I will be able to report whether or not Ericksons feels they need to do additional testing. Thank you. Best personal regards. I. G. Barry Anderson GBA:lm Enclosure u 'CL"Y�IT® JS a C -IL T 8IA1 S � ST Df iDL YiA230TA � H'- ASSOC1aSiOF "C£YTT M AS A v•.- PHOPEYST STATE HA8 - OC� ysID D. AZAIID • or><r a. >a<no� {iZPpd a. l�Dt>S� srsrnr S. Dooc LA£L s. ParLirn r te£ n. Hors acffi Y_ PAST J�1[=� DTlIT �)m O. DcGif II10IHY �. D•PL'�I L)<S I. D Nwi 4TDLT} D -1 March 4, 1992 ARxol.D & McDowEli. ATToax AT lax lot Pe>s P ucz HUTCHINSCM. M INRS.SOTJ 55350 -2363 (612) 587 -7575 PAI (SIS) � -� >�Tnncr .rmasz 6 DAlYT LlDCDlm1 C7v k4I1) 7532 ti RFXZ NED m N N g} Mr. Gary D. Plotz te City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Environmental Issues - Phase II Our File Ho. 3244 -91046 DODti6 i1LLL1 W. C.viJ� LTD C. LALLII! PAT1 Y. DIDICD xd c�.s £Asa eo.D �AP018. YDi!!<SOTA 'sY! (Q xs -s000 v zou. esa eoo -w -dQ lAZ (tY) 5 �S -I19J S4 90II]Z POU4TH lTZSa PDIFCE'l�.. ][ilflflOaTA STII PAI Imo) 3!Y -SS96 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Dear Gary: I am enclosing herewith a copy of correspondence received from Twin City Testing Corporation and material enclosed with that correspondence. Please provide this information to the City Council in the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting packet. I have orally advised Ericksons and Everest that no further testing is recommended. I hope by the tine of our next meeting I will be able to report whether or not Ericksons feels they need to do additional testing. Thank you. Best personal regards. I. G. Barry Anderson GBA:lm Enclosure u 'CL"Y�IT® JS a C -IL T 8IA1 S � ST Df iDL YiA230TA � H'- ASSOC1aSiOF "C£YTT M AS A v•.- PHOPEYST STATE HA8 - OC� '10 ■- —■ .. .. R t=ernary 17 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Mr. Gary Plou City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue west Hutchinson, Mjnnesola 55350 Subject: Phase E Environmental Site Assessment Report CSry of H ukh insoiL Block# 47 H utchison, Minnesota #4231 424)339 Dear Mr. Pk>tr This report presents the Insults of the Phase II Emironmeaat Site Assessment work performed by Twin City Testing Corporation (TCT) at the above referenced siae Our work was performed m accordmoe • with our proposal dated January 14, 1992 and verbally mthorizod by Mr. Barry Anderson, City of Hutchinson auorDey, on January 15, 1942 We appreciate the opportunity to have been of smv= to you on this project. If you have any quesdoas regarding the inhannatiou preseated in the environmental report, or if we can be of addi6oml service, please contact as at your convenience. I can be reached as 6121659 -753& Cordiany. 1) 01V tt� - �5. GXAsa� Nanette B. Geraas Project Manager Environmental Site Asseswnent r fag Encl osures 4 A ^ of the HIH pas 0 a..cr,rs Item TABLE OF CONTIIPI'S CIS INTRODUCITON ......__.... .. ............................... 1 Scopeof wart ............... ............................... I !1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS 3L Background Information ........ ............................... I So" Borings Sol Lit hol oW ................ ............................... 2 Groundwater ................ ............................... 2 Evidence of Contamination . ............................. . . . .... 2 Chemical Analysis DISCUSSION a REcommE• mATIONS ................ . .......... 3 STANDARD OF CARE ......... ............................... 3 UST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1 - SITE MAP FIGURE 2 - SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION MAP 1 '. , 1 > a 0 IM N ;I ! 1 a D L�I r r r a t CITY OF HUMEMCSOK BLOCK# 47 *4 Z31 924LI3 1 11 •• / This report presents the reaalts of the Phase n &tc Assessment perfumed by 'Irvin City Testing Cbrpmt ion (TC1) for the City of Hutchinson at Block# 47 located in down o n Howliawn, Minnesota (see figure 1� The wort was conducted to asses the presence of soil com®inatim at the project site. Sane of Wort The scope of Bork pcdxmed for the project was limited to the following - Dulling four standard penetration sod bormp to a maximum depth of 14 feel below grade (depth to groundwater) at the project site; - Screening soil samples in the field and in the laboratory using an organic vapor defector; - Collecting representative soil samples for possible rbemical analyses; and - Preparing a written report including by of soil borings, results of the sal screening and field observations, and our opinioos/re000unmdadons regarding additional emimmental wort. ENVIpONM WrAL RESULTS TCT conducted a Phase I Environmental Sire Assessment of the project sie whiek vas reported under TCT job# 473142-0339 on dated December 31, 199L Subsurface exploration watt was recommended dw b several previous on-she activities indesdmg - The ahaaduned underground storage tank located beneath the Farmers Ekvator Association offer - The fixer oil and grease building bated along the west side of the raA tracts near 1st Avenue NE; - The International Harvester farm impiemeae repair service; and - The possible we of rodenticides associated with the formes hatch_ Additionally, several off-site activities were b®d to have a potential impact on the project block, inch� Several nearby automotive gasoline stations and repair garages; and The hydrocarbon contamination discovered near the forma bulk storage f Kffity (located north of 1s1 Avenue NE). • • I O POIUO \aMnAL RESULTS (continued) Sol Doro6 a Four standard penetration soil borings, numbered B-1 through 84, were advanced ter, S. Mae kxations marimum depth of.13 feet below grade. at the rite by mcsirods described in APPS of the sod boring were based upon the Phase I recommendationk the aooessibit9 of the aaa and the cimmace of privat uhlic utilities. The soil boring locav5ons are shown on Fipwre 2. Log of the sad borings are included in Append A_ All borings were abo odoned by filling wits neat ceoeat grout Sox I3thciov The sods encounteed at the site consisted of fill andtor topsail underlain by cosh abrrW sow comprised of sand with sa,,t and a little gravel, sand with a fine grand and dayey sand with a Ink gtaveL A 3 foot hoer of sandy lem clay was encountered in bong B-1 at a depth of Z3 feet below grade. f rnrurd�a� Groundwaier was encountered in afl four standard penetration borings drilled at the project site. The depth to groundwater ranged from 6 to 13 feet below glade. Assumed groundwater Bow &"Xtion is sroutheasteriy toward the South Fork of the Crow River based upon the Minnesota G°°I°grc SurKy information available for the H u tchinsm area. • Evidence or Conte Aar hNc ]dodel 101 phoknoniration detector cgmpped with a 102 eV lamp was utilised in dae field to obtain nnatm eoaeentr Inns oforganic vapors from recovered soil samples. The methods used to obtain these rcadiags are presented in Appendix B. The hNu readings determined in the hdtoratory are included in Appendix A. In boricg B-3. organic vapors were detected in soil sarros obtained from the two to low foot interval. Yuual evidence of possible unna Ural soil was also observed is this interval. however. no additional evideD= of passible cmummation was encountered in boring 13-3. No visual evidcace and olfactory evidence of soil contamination was encountered in the remaining three boring advanced as the project site. 9noiol Anahrtis Cbemial analyses of the sot,, samples collected at the groundwater interface was not performed. page 2 #42319239 • r I 1 U1 � I DISCUSSION AND Based upon our Geld observations and hNu readings obtained in the Iaboratom it appears that soil Contamination was not encountered in the boriap drilled at the project site. The slightly elevated organic vapor reading encountered in boring B-3 appears to be localized in the clayey sand layer. It is our opinion that additional eavaonmental work is not wamated at the project site at this time. STANDARD OF CARE The recommendations contained in this report represent our proli sional opinions. These opinions were arrived at in accordance wuh currently accepted bydro¢nbgic and enginiccring practices at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty is impbed or iaaended. TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION Nanette B. Geroax Project Manager Environmental Site Atseammt Scott G Tracy Senior ProjwtManager Environmental Division r -cr/ng Page 3 #423192-0339 • • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 25!-" 3C .. y �� _ ......r. •° IXWZI- i 4* I. L ./ M IL.0 _ nr f E ON I- ilk . $ mil / - - n � I c ^: 6 Ch r l cn a e. 'i � // T J 1 , l am _ • Hj. / \ V � -� � /�/ I 7 .�.. _�� t _ /r te - fi1i7I�Sp\ wT 1 Mir HUTC.&UNSON EAST, MINN. I - �inS wIN, ME. "Tco oll is. ou o ° Pl"525 -w94 150.5 1982 Q1HOf�++GIE laOlnpn 1st AVENUE. NORTHEAST a O Q a 1 / I ■ II n -z 41 � � IYASHINCTON AVENUE FAST LEGEND SOIL PORING LOCATLON Im LkI,fIW MOM RAIL ROAD TRACKS SCALE: 1" . IDO' (APPROkIMATELY) N012'm DWG. 97 -33M 13 twin tustallizil i FIGURE #2 SOIL BORING LOCATIONS FOR CITY OF IiUTCIIINSON, BLOCK #47 HUTCIIINSON, MINNESOTA JOB # :11 U" -0110 I ' i , r • The Advocate For Greater Minnesota Newsletter of the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities Volume 3 N5 March 5, 1992 STATE BUDGET DEFICIT THREATENS LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRUST FUND Dear Members: This is a time for truthfulness at g< ernma¢ Less than a year ago the state established the Local Government 7}hest Fund with the promise of a sent -e source of funding for property tax relief. Now, with the projected stare budget shortfall growing to nearly $570 o0ion, the state will be looking to the Pust fund for merteti to balance the state's budget. The Coalition believes that thu u reahy a matter of the integrity of state officials. If the G.nemor and legislators now make major cuts from cite Tsui Fund, local government offcutIs must wares whether dhey can trust anything promised by the state The Coalition's executive carivrtirer met of February 2.5 to discuss these issues. We took a s;rengposaron opposing cuts from the Trust Fund, and we approved a new Coalition proposal for findug der homestead credit and LGA for 1993 and 1994. 77i pr�osal ir needed to fill the vacuum left by the Governor s veto. Our proposal is important because it restores _4ak� for the homestead credit and for LGA, including reav-a%able increases in both programs. We will be askirc� a= legislators for their support. The erecutive committee also the agenda for our summer conference at Cragun s, The dares for the conference are July 12 through July 24. Mark your calendars and plan to attend very truly you Tyr `"•�� / Tom Slaggie, Mayor of Winos.= and President of the Coalition of Grecto Mmnewta Cities On February Z', the state Department of Finance released its new revenue forecast This forecast projected a budget deficit of 5569 million for this biennium, an increase in the shortfall of more than 5220 million just since the last estimate in November. . The Governor is expected to release his budget recommendations by the end of this week, and significant cuts in 1992 LGA and HACA payments are likely to be pan of these recommendations. Large cuts are possible, and again cities would nor be able to replace the lost revenues. This will put many legislators in a tough position. For example, the Governor's proposal could force many IR legislators to choose between the Governor and the welfare of the local governments and property taxpayers in their districts. Other legislators who oppose the cuts proposed by the Governor may be forced to support cuts in other state programs, or sere tax hicreases. The Coalition wiD be taking a strong position opposing any cuts in the LG-F this year, and will be using the following major arguments to oppose these cuts: Local governments have already taken major cuts totalling Ski million during the 1991 session alone. • The Local Government Trust Fund was established to separate sate and local funding and improve accountability. Cutting the Trust Fund now to balance the state budget would violate the principle of state accountabdirv. • Trust Fund programs will automatically be cut by over S5 million because revenues are below projections. Additional cats would be unfair. Protecting the Trust Fund from cuts this year should be a matter of integrity for the Governor and legislators. If they cannot resist the temptation to take money from the Trust Fund now, then they should drop the Trust Fund illusion, and admit that the 120 sales tax increase was really a state tax increase needed to pay for state spending. CGMC PROPOSAL RESTORES LGTF FUNDING FOR 1994-1995 There is a lot of confusion about the status of funding for the homestead credit and other property tax relief for next .Ear. The 1993 homestead credit (HACA) pr.�ents would ha been paid out of the state's fic--i: year 1994 appropriations from the Local Governmen_ Trust Fund. However, the Governor vetoed those approp^_ons for the next biennium. As a result of the Governor's veto, there * no money appropriated for the homestead credit for siendar year 1993, unless the Legislature acts to restore thar fundinp. The Legislature is expected to act on this woe, and the Coalition's proposal provides an initial r ework for a Locating the LGTF money among the prc- y tax relief programs next biennium. The following are the major reasons why loci nwernments and legislators should support this proposal • It restores fiindine for the homestead credit. Funding for the homestead credit for 1993 and fu =e years was eliminated by the Governor's veto. �,. proposal restores the homestead credit and providL-- or a modest increase in the base HACA amounts to be paid out of the LGTF. It provides a modest increase In LGA. The increase in LGA is equal to the percent increase in sales tax revenues and can be paid for out of the normal growth in the LGTF. A modest increase in LGA is needed now in order to prevent large property tax increases in ci" with low taxable wealth. • It restores fundine for the new class rate buydowns These class rate reductions will reduce taxes for high value homes, businesses and apartments. Funding for the buydowns to take effect in calendar years 1993 and 1994 was also vetoed by the Governor and should be restored. It protects the best levels of 11ACA and LGA from future cuts. If the money in the LGTF is insufficient to fund all of the appropriations, the HACA increases related to the new class rate buydowns would be cut first. The base levels of HACA and LGA would be protected. The Coalition proposal is important because it restores funding for the homestead credit and provides a reasonable increase in LGA next year. The LGTF was established as a fund dedicated to property tax relief, and this proposal allocates money in the fund for that purpose. It does not affect this biennium's budget deficit. Allocation of 1994 -1995 Growth In LGTF Revenues Under CGMC Proposal HACA New Class Rate Buydowns General Fund HACA Household and other growth 555 million Total Estimated Growth = $262 million LGA increase Note: All figures are estimates. $65 million $13 million Unallocated $23 million Prepared by Brigg � Morgan for the Coalition (7 f A, 4 rvcz r 57�1 b FOR YOUR INFOMATIONI -2qJJLLAL(1 ` 159E I - ;(.,prr ,c t i._ [J t.L ; _ /)Esc. �Tr/A[_ By 1977 - I )f7 fi f.s / ry 11'7 /077 /(.7 , z 7. 160 ob A 179 127 - 1 7/ 1 /,FY .7- 1. Yy 7 I075 '97 FF rs/ r - ALI, T - -1- /lid 10 - JQ V to 11 10723 n! 7�3 ,3"3 56 1 pis A -56 k- -jYZ. Ali "j- f.3. o's; oil, of t 17 . ql q1 -4 3. cu rl 7.5 71' If j law, .011 J1 1 -ij37-- 76 0 4y 13 T ! , Ias i 137 V/ 3 F 4/1 so Nerryl "ILT A-i` b FOR YOUR INFOMATIONI -2qJJLLAL(1 ` 159E is is Is IF N It 12 1, 34 is I - ;(.,prr ,c t i._ [J t.L ; _ /)Esc. �Tr/A[_ By 1977 - I )f7 f.s PIP ob A 179 - L&L qj�- - V, - 4; .7- 1. Yy 7 L �13 r - ALI, T - -1- /lid 10 - 1171 I -56 k- -jYZ. Ali "j- t 17 . ql q1 -4 71' :71 -7 J! j J1 1 13 T 07L 137 V/ "ILT A-i` I 'I __ I 1 �/_1 _ _Lv� ii _� °. ° r__� y �'�`. �_FLQ � /a,- �_. � 1 _ �_. -� C _ ��1r �� - �I. 1 0 A4:- —F � .J I I. �.I �7 I .11{ J�O -i �� +'..li� ,I j_i !_ 1. 4 „ ! j is is Is IF N It 12 1, 34 is • Hutchinson Community Development Corporation Board of Directors Wodnesday, February 5, 1992 Chamber Meeting Room Directors Present James Bullard - Chairman John lAlinar Phil Graves Larry Graf Carol Haukos Larry Fraser William Craig Others Present John Bemhagen -Exec Director MINUTES The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bullard. Motion was made by Graves, seconded by Craig and carried to approve the minutes of January 3, 1992. Motion by Craig, seconded by Milner and carried to approve the Treasurers Report. Chairman Bullard and Bemhagen presented the 1992 Work Plan compiled from recommendations from Board members, city administration and others. Discussion and suggested additions and changes were made by the Board members. Motion by Craig, seconded by Fraser and carried to approve the seventeen objectives for the 1992 Work Plan. Motion by Graf, seconded by Haukos and carried to submit to the city council a resolution to be passed by the council for recertification as a 'Star City.' Bemhagen reported on progress of Phase I & II, the Govemors State of the State message and visit to Hutchinson on February 11, his work on the city zoning ordinance, and that he would be completing the necessary steps for "Star City' recertification. The application for the All- American City Award Program Is due April 6 and It was felt next year would be a better time to consider applying, at which time some of the city's major projects would be near completion. The board of directors will be meeting with the city council on February 10 to review their last years' work plan and describe their program for 1992. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned E • HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULAR HEETIOG Monday, February 3, 1992 Meeting opened at 8:15 p.m. The Firemen's Dance will be held January 16, 1993, at Cedars Edge featuring the Highliners. Casey reported engineers meeting will be February 26, 1992, at 7 :00 p.n. at the fire station. The bills and runs were read as follows: CITY AND RURAL BUDGET Two way Communications 65.00 Hutch Wholesale 37.93 Two way Communications 113.55 Hutch Wholesale 147.75 EPA Audio Visual 292.00 Hutch Wholesale 66.42 Dean Dostal 100.00 Hutch Wholesale 133.15 Med- Compass, Inc. 1,972.00 Hutch Wholesale <19.50> Victorian Inn 66.31 Hutch Wholesale <28.00> Fire Engineering 21.95 Hutch Wholesale 59.26 Allen Office 13.96 Big Bear 18.99 Coast to Coast 3.26 Olson's Locksmith 26.00 Steve Schramm 34.44 Allen Office 10.40 Standard Spring Co 174.00 Hutch Fire & Safety 76.10 Ink Spots 19.18 TOTAL $ 3,431.63 Hutch Wholesale 3.08 Hutch Wholesale 24.40 GENERAL BUDGET Mike Schuetze 99.10 Northland Bev 25.50 Lake Marion Ballroom 125.00 Soundsation 500.00 Cashwise 38.50 Bob Schantzen 4.58 Viking Signs 90.00 Schramm Impl. 2.97 TOTAL $ 885.65 • . r.l. ��..�...�..,�... .w ... .... � �wu... Ya.. a...>..:. 1w.:—.,-. n�. i. a.. a.. u_ s�. v. .�..r+.a..t..sa...�.w.s./L�sa.y Y...Sa ): A:'u.t�s ti.f ..-. �✓n:.. •>14AW 1/2 Evergreen 1/27 Hutch Hospital 1/6 Don Kenning 1/29 10 -52 1/7 Goebel Fixture 1 /20 Hutch Utilities 1 /10 7 West Wash and Dry 1/31 311 1/13 31! 1/31 10 -52 1/13 Clark 1/31 Victorian Inn 1 1/1: Ring Motel 1/6 Drill /fleeting 1/17 Clsen 1/13 Drill 1/20 Hamre 1120 Drill /Teamwork 1/20 Goebels 1/22 Engineers 1/22 Rubischko 1/27 Regional 1/23 Hichlen A motion was made and seconded to approve the bills and run: ]lotion was nade and seconded to accept with regrets the resignation of Joe Drahos effective 2/3/52. (lotion was made and seconded to take Jon Burks off of reserve and reapply if interested. John Reynolds made a motion to withdraw his motion until actual procedures be looked into. Motion was made and seconded to table vote until next month. • Steve reported he will put a sign -up sheet in the control room for anyone needing replacement gear. Brad reported the station cleanup, will be February 19th at 7:30 p.r. for the town board meeting Thursday, February 20th at 5:00 p. n. Steve reported any item bought over $100.00 needs 2 bids. Please keep this in mind it you do any purchasing. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Sub,ultted by, Bob Schantzen Secretary 0 19 HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICER'S 14EETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1992 The meeting opened at 915 p.m. Gary reported we need to watch our comments over radio, no vulgar or obscene language. }like reported air compressor is down. New springs are in 238. Randy reported Harch 2, 1992 we will be touring Hutch Technology's new building. Steve reported roof leaks will be taken care of. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. • Bob Schantzen Secretary • Ll PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM Ll Hq.: 410 West Fitth Street Willmar, MN 56201 RARY Phone No. 612J235 -3162 Fax. No. 6121235 -3169 MINUTES OF FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING, February 10, 1992, Willmar Library Present: Phifer, Mahnke, Sanders, Bohm, Boulahan, Matson Absent: Lacombe The February payroll and vendor checks were approved and signed. The treasurer checked the December 1991 and January 1992 treasurer's reports with the ledger. Mr. Boulahan distributed a summary of anticipated income and expenditures by month for the balance of 1992. Phifer /Sanders authorized withdrawal of an automation certificate of deposit due to low interest rates and need to maintain an adequate cash flow. Passed. The next meeting of the Finance Committee will be held at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, March 9, 1992, Willmar Library. Box suppers will be ordered for the committee members. • atson Recorder • 62/)14" 1 /11/92 14119110 5L FUVD _..___14%RA ._ 4:000MT OkSCRI►TIOY •• 31 LIARAAT • 150 PkASONAL SERVICES 610, SALANIEi 013 MA;,ES 11119 NLAITH IM SUAAMCE SISJ 41 41LTH INS'JAANCt - UEDU ;TISLF 6170 ALTIREM:Nf IVSJ4ANCi • TOT 4L PERSDMAL SERVICES ►IUNlERlAT1D 116RANT 176TH 1AtluarF6 rtrAAle[al f7sr6N !!►EpOI T41EE W IDOL IY v a c ♦ �IF+n U O< 1 /1i _.- _CURAEN7 ACTUAL _ _ ACTWL OUDSET THIS -RONTM TEAR -TO -DATE no,o6o.50 6o,6n.5T a,3n. +r ta,6oa.00_ t,240.n i,teo.9• 4,eoo.ou 4os.11 4us.0 Ig 3. h1, 00 f. /]2.66 8.631 JL 6.306.72 106.391.[1 6 H ARNrE i1p 1rst93 PA• 1001 1/0/52 1) ../ PE41:10 ON YEA SOOT - ACT DIFFERENCE PCT 145.10•.0] 2.,111.,64 54.174. L4 172.595.60 • LID MATERIELS S235 6394S - AJULT 112.700.00 6,306.72 6.306.72 106.391.[1 6 621J 933 - CHILSREM 60.700.00 770.11 715.11 32,120.69 2 5213 SaMER AL REFE N:! 143 114),#3 1,3►L q 11,610.17 P. 6224 PiR1001CA1S 26.750.00 260.71 260.73 26.461.27 1 6Z2S PAM►MLFTS 306.00 .DO .00 )OJ.00 0 __. .1229. 34IVIA 4TI44RI 4ATERIALS 4,667.00 1.079.77 1.477,77 1.767.23 22 5230 REIaOM 4164 4MY MATERIALS 1,417.00 $6.14 46.14 1.)73.66 1 62)2 FAt4f AX GIFT MAIFAIALS 2 630.01 610.01 2.236.17 22 6215 CHTPPEMA COUNTY LIe4ARY MATeRIALS _ ZQ.1_41 L.0 4A 66___ 1.546.60 19.001.34 6 S26J MJMIEIIOEJ 9AtE41ALS 12,036.00 132.31 . 932.11 _ _ II.125.69 6 S245 1S4" FILMS 2.000.00 .00 .00 - 2.000.90 0 _. S250 VIDEO t4PE3 S ,0y0 . 00 1 14 s 13 7 24 ,63 4.675,37 2 SZS5 AU 1 10 ITS:$ AND TAPES 400.00 22.10 it. SO _ )77.10 Vila SLIJES 443 FILM Sf XIPS 250.00 .00 .00 253.00 a 6265 MICRFORMS 100.00 .00 .DO _ 30J.00 D 5270 $14DIMf. _ 1,000.00 _ .00 _ .00 1,000.00 0 • TOTAL MATERIALS 20,371.60 14,905.61 16,905.61 222,673.19 6 • 11w CATALOSIMi S61J RCLC AND UTHFA :MARjFS _ 17.6 0 .00 6.500.00 6,100,00 9.1DS." 4, 6320 CJM VC 1 0314 :MAR.ES 26,000." 646.90 _ 646.10 25,351.10 2 • 12TAL CATALOGIN.: 43, "6.16 1,146.10 1.146." 34,631.10 21 • I10 V1R1CL!S 4350 OPFA4TNM 4No R4INTL4AMCE - - - -- 16.600.00 1.196.16 1 176.76 11,403.24 6 6114 INSJRAN:! 3,41S.00 1,767.66 _ 1.4 _ _ 1.446.12 56 6670 AMORTIZATION 6.000." .00 00 6,000.00 0 . TOM VEHICLES _ _ _ _ _ 24011.00 1.1S _. - )144,16 _ 22.649.36 12 • 140 :0•NUNTCArtJN 6610 TELtPMONE AND LINE CHARGES 1(1,000.60 1,111.73 1,112.71 - 6,161. i7 11 5420 TERMINAL MAINTFIIAMCE 1,000.60 .00 .M 1.000.00 0 _ 1430 PJSrAGE 4160 SMI /PING 12. 1.121.49 t� 11,597.15 / • MAL COMMUNICATION 2),719.60 2.240." _ _),lit. 2.246.16 21,474.52 / !... ISO F6111PN!AT_ 001, -. MEN faUIPMERT 2.655.00 2.315.•0 2,513.00 60.00 9a A/V FAUIPMENT 1.000.00 .00 .00 1.003.00 0 •AIMTEMANCE AND CONTRACTS .0(1 Aa1L." ___ _ S,1IG" 12.527.96 16 • EQUIPMENT 16.655.00 5.067.02 9,067.02 13.397.16 27 • UO )INCA S505 CJSIODTAL SUPPLIES AYJ EOUTPPt4T I.SOD." 676.16 476.16 1.023.64 12 5502 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - M7NTEVIDLO 5}040.99 .00 __ .00 _ 5.000.00 0 6510 SUPPLIES AMC PRINTING 27.494.00 1.773.25 1,115.23 25.516.75 7 5$15 PA)6)ITJNAL AND ►ROGAA•NINS 1,000.00 .00 .00 1.00J.OD 0 6320 • ILEArE AND MLETINGS - STAFF 5 500.04 266.76 •.231.22 4 4525 MIL.AGE AND REFIINGS - TRUSTEES _ 4,500.00 __i6e,te $76.70 ____ STS.70 3.121.30 13 6530 PROF. MERITERSMIPS (TRUSTEES) 400.00 .00 .00 ♦00.00 0 .6513 IMS4I4MCE _ _ _ 0 ,090.00__ 11.46 0,00__ _ _11.460.00 1.540.40 •6 6640 ADS AND LESAL NOTICES 100.00 100.00 100.00 .00 log 4345 A.,OITI 1.500.00 .00 .00 1.500.00 0 5510 4J3ARiFPINS _ 3-000.00 225 .94 225,00 2.775.00 a 6555 CORTINUING EDUCATION 500.00 14.41 14.41 495.59 3 655• S ;40LARSMIP PUN) 3.000." .00 .00 1.000.00 a 6570 •JVINi iRPFS3k - DIRECTJR _. 1.0p6.N 1.23L. 1.234.47 236.47- 121 • TOTAL OTHER µ,494.00 16.334.77 16.334.71 50.151.23 25 • 175 SPECIAL 6610 GLENCJE FRIENDS. 1963 1.362.00 .00 .00 1.162.00 0 6620 R:ML _._ 4.511.00 7 11.25111. 23 _ .4.104.15 2 Sol,' SLSD LJCAL E411I141pMT Sf4f! SALTS TAX 6.000.00 2,000.00 559.11 409.13 957.11 409.71 5.44J.H 1.590.D7 9 20 • TOTAL SPECIAL 13.676.00 1.000.29 _._1.080,21 12.797.71 6 •• TOTAL LIBRARY _ 1.404 713.00 164.1 !_f,ll..___ 164.754.91 1.350,136.09 10 ••• FINAL TOTAL$ 49 ACCOUNTS ._ 1 174 711.00 144.394.91 144.3 71 _ 1.350,136.09 10 SAIJUes LLPT 06 54.421.16 34.437.10 7/ 5:57 O1 FU.P LIFAAAV INTtGMA1FU FINANCIAL $VlTCM REVENUE GUIDELINE 1�1101 1 4S, AS OF 1/92 FJO: I /3./v2 10122/24 PERCENT DF YEAR 06 t:000MT DESCRIPTION __-- -_ -_ [ull2lM AC T1Mt<___... _ ACTUAL _ boor - ACT .. _ . ,__ _ 5425 RETMSURSSMEMTS - . OLIVIA (MATERIALO_OMLY) 1UOGET TMIl -MOMTM Y "i-TO -0410 DIFFERENCE PCT RAL14Ci WRIm 7'ORMRRA RtI)4RO - 6!NSOM (MATERIALS OMLY) 3 116,630.63 34,2 -:,.63 .00 1.500.00 71 LLAAAY 5444 REI46 - CMIPPENA COUNTY (MATERIALS ONLY) 15.000.00 250.U0 250.00 14.750.00 310 RECEIPTS 565J RII119 - NJrI!VIUFU (RATERIALf OMYJ 10.000. 00 _ .00 .00 10.000.00 1100 misi RVE 32,3!9.00 .00 .00 )2.)3Y.J0 J 5101 5AS1C STAFF /FEDERAL AID - .��St.bS ____ X 0 0 _,_ _. .00 392,691.V0 _ 0 . 1110 RIG ST'IYF COUNTY 22.97).00 3,7 63.29 9.70.25 11,229.75 23 5113 CMTPPEWA COUNTY _ _ _�_74139.DD_ -. _ .VO .00 77,339.00 0 1120 KAM)IVO"I COUNTY 124.490.Ou 29.070.00 29.670.90 94.620.00 24 5122 'LAC OUT PAIL! COUNTY 31,673.00 7.911.29 7.916.23 23,734.79 2s _ 5125 MC LEOD COUNTY .. - 72.9'4.00 . LII .DO 76,944.,)0 _. J _ 5131 -CFAFA COJYIv 73,406.00 10.391.30 19,331.50 9i,JS4.00 25 1132 RCNVTLLZ LnumrY 92.049.00 12.190.00 12.190.00 49,650.00 70 5133 S.IFT CJUNTY _. ._35.NL OW __- _..00 .00 15,942.00 J S177 YELLOW MEJIGIN! COUNTY )9.157.00 .00 .00 16,357.00 0 S140 A►PL4i Or 9,677.00 2.419.21 2.419.25 1,247.75 25 _Sly SENSON _.._ - - - -� 19.93s.00 A4�J b.2s__. ..�•, gb.2S._ _L4. S14.7S. ._.1S__ ____. 5144 FAIAFAX 9.921.00 2,422.00 2.462.00 7.446.00 25 5150 GLFNCJF 20,077.00 7.219.29 7.21 21.637.75 25 5155 - -1 157 - GAACFVILLC _ ._ _ 4.0 10 .OD_ 1.O Q7.SD _. .. __ ._1,007.50 3.022.30 2S_ GAANTrF FALLS 21,310.00 5,127.s0 9.827.su 17,482.50 23 5160 MUTCAIYSON 63.053.OU .00 .00 63,J13.VO J 9163 KERK40VE4 1. 0)100 .. 1,037.00 _ 3,111.00 23 1170 L1rCHFIELO 44,991.00 11.247.75 11.247.75 31,743.25 15 5172 nLIVTA 22.137.00 5.304.25 S, 564. 7s 16.794.73 2, Vvi OATJ9VTLLt _13,)00.00 __ . -- _3.323.00 ).)25.00 9.975.00 7.5 5160 W1LLrAR 101.256.00 2S.A46.00 29.464.00 76,392.00 1s 5123 5111) ISLAND 9.920.00 2.462.00 2. 7,446.00 25 5190 7944504 _. ___y.14�00, 3 -2 ■ 100.. 3.267.00 10,651.00 23 SIDS H.CTO 2.607.90 .00 .00 6.667.00 _ 0 1204 MA n[SJY 14,940.Ou 3.735.00 9.7is.00 11.205.00 25 5205 RirV ILO .11 _ _ 00 .01) 11.15#.00 3 5410 CAS" AFCFIPr3 C SALES TAX 50.000.00 3.992.99 ).9)0.93 46,041.07 _ 0 542) GIFTS 3.000.00 .00 .00 3.000.00 0 _ 5430 WiRcsf _ . A.90D.D0_ _ . -00_. ... .. .. .01) 6.500.00 y_ TOTAL RECEIPTS 1 157,907.60 157.967.68 1,209,727.32 is 020 REII4USEMENIS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) 401 1E1r9JRSFAFMTS CMIPPEWA COUMrY(►ERSOMMEL 11.236.00 .00 .00 16,232.00 V _ 5425 RETMSURSSMEMTS - . OLIVIA (MATERIALO_OMLY) 2.179.00_. .00 .. _. .00 _ .4.179.00 0 5 631 RtI)4RO - 6!NSOM (MATERIALS OMLY) 1,600.00 .00 .00 1.500.00 _ u 5444 REI46 - CMIPPENA COUNTY (MATERIALS ONLY) 15.000.00 250.U0 250.00 14.750.00 2 565J RII119 - NJrI!VIUFU (RATERIALf OMYJ 10.000. 00 _ .00 .00 10.000.00 4 TOTAL REIMSUSEMENTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) 47.617.00 250.00 250.00 47.367.00 1 030 074ER Rc TMMJQacMFNTS S67V OIMER 4 .1.4%un SFAFNTS 3.500,00 35.70 35. 3.404.30 1 TOTAL OT414 ReIM2UR3E10NT7 .),599.0 _ )1.70 35.70 3.464.30 _1 JSJ OT4t1 FUY)S - -- - - 501S AJTOMATION FUND ..- .. �- .00 1.422.00 . - __ 3,422.00- J 1 970 KCWL 5,000.00 4.230.00 6,250.00 750.00 95 S925 LOCAL 9 QUI►M!NT 9 MISCELLAMEOUf, 6_ 0 00.0 0 .00 _._. .. .00 6.000.00 0.. TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 11,000.00 7.672.00 7.672.00 3,324.00 To TOTAL LISKARY 165.945.16 1.341.624.62 It 'IMAL TOTALS 41 ACCOUNTS - _ 1,909.032.00 14!.945.30 1A5.945.s1 1.343.006.62 11 !9791 R3L71PT9 IuD - - -. -17.171.00 0 34.131.0 •. - T, /17.711.06 - - '�i; fit 380.74.01 1111 /.1 ,', .! J IL H9a IiOv •tLAY4. LII NII ST 6TA c04Yt1 H .00 _ - .01 1 u2r151 3: THUS taf•s6Rfl6 (FINK /4 59 {T.9 .00 111 ►111{ Past a tt. 1S autiol" g1pLEN U v a t" lJM :03161#1 loggia%► 4, 403.00 46..51 1.025.71 400.00 "WAI OE 9611 At4 - ,_ A•rs,.T 111U"Pf1O1 _. _ __ -- - -- CV4rrT -. _4CIrAl -- _Jirya4- .. -Utt aAC .00 10e.0 1 {m"IT THIS -MMIN 71A4- )0-wTE OtrFlalut Kr f •• , J - 1111AaC_ -JC - - --- -- 500.04 75.00 19.41 1, .00 S 1,004.00 -. _ -. 7.9E - -- I,246_4 S 46,496. 00 5.229.]] S.05 SALARIES 410 6AJ!: SJ0,000.60 79.0$0.96 169.7.1 .71 I6t,zs7. /f 11 6111 ._r1SArd.131341,14cl _ - - 46 __ J•32691______ A. W 9.65 21.190.1�.__.li- 611i MCAITM INWAINCL - 0EU'JCr19Ll 4.200.% .Uo t67 s. 4,19$.5$ 0 sl S: ALTIAC -0( IY aUL6VCc 1010.7.00 . 17.421.04 94.L•1.96 it for61- nnoxAl SERVICES __ 2.046.967.00 ____90.910.05.__ 191.65L.2f __6__ 110 -LTa LLAL i- _- - -___. S.3. 131AS - q'Ar 112, IJ0. 00 2.•14.50 - 111.103.10 4 571: 013AS - CAILO,•. 30.900.00 1,H 1. )l 2,161./1 26,116.17 I ,.A.. ■lFiltMl ___ _ .16,040.04_ ____- 4.031..7 _ 4,OSl.S4 - _1.944.50__ -_]9 6220 •sal OJ l: H1 26.190. 765.96 1.036.69 2S. 121.11 . 6 Q2; PAMIMLEFS 100.20 .00 .00 106.00 0 - -_ 4L0. 113RJ1 ■1TEA144.3 - - -_____ - A.a•1, 0p ' {0.110. -- 1.2 /0./6 9•/14.41 •, S21J /2VSO4 116RA•V MA- I!A1ALS 1.611.04 9.67 56.01 1.103.99 4 sill -Ara-,. Gill AAI2AIALS 2,1.•.04 17..21 1,•x4.24 1.4$6.76 N - -- $13S_UIP:Y CDJ9f7 LISAAAT fq Ttt",S - 43.544.04 -__ 1,291.72_. _ _.4.165.41 13.701.57_ L_ 5260 RO4T!f F]EO MAI!AIALS 12.052.00 916.71 1.749.02 1],106.96 19 4241 1.14 E1L91 2.000.00 .00 .00 2.000.00 0 641J _Tq].0 Thlit _ _ __- _ _ 5.000.00- ___ -___ - .00- _ -._.- 114.41__ - ._. 0.a1S.17 6.55 1401^ DISCS AID TAPES Do J2 -_z- 171.10 62SJ SLIJ!S A13 F(L ST•IP1 2a0. .00 .00 26..00 J SISS 3L:AFJ"S - 160.01 _ - ... 11.50 _17.50 252.50 62 41VJING 1.000.04 .00 .00 1,000.00 0 • fOTAL MATERIALS 211.119.00 12.776.73 27,602.36 239.696.66 12 • iN CAIALN14. 611. --LL - 465 JI.E, 4NAR4Ef 1 W {. 00 _ _ _. .O D. _ ._ 1.900.04 1.106.00 61 43!4 :.• 71V43d CNA•JE3 24.000.04 106.25 9SS.15 25,044.85 _ 4 • TOTAL CA74LN.IN6 41.600.00 104.29 9.655.19 14.IS2.85 21 • 13. Vo4iCL -a ._._- $J4. 20{6111 J'1 A.) •.Ilt~jcr 14.640.0. :.526.40 2,6:3.4, 11.97..16 14 si.l IMf J•A4.f SJ7J 4Y :4tli.T110 1.415.04 .00 1.969.60 L.64S.L7 S6 0.000.04 .00 .00 4.400. 40 J - • 13TAL •E41CLES 26.015.00 1,426.09 4.s91.sz 21.421.40 10 i. • 144 1: Li1J9 651)fAla••'1,! 410 ll•E LMA•.•3 10.000.00 1.111.70 2,430.51 /.569.49 24 N!, rSa VL,aS 6418 y4.:i I.Olo.00 .00 .00 1,00J.20 J A.S. PJ51W ANO UIP11 17.715.00 914.14 2.124.6 0 1 90. 91 12 . • 13111 CIMAUNI: A IIM 27.7 3 5.00 1,91..12 •, »4.6 19,656.40 u -• LSD IJul•At.11 S.5, Z !J'1319!VT 2.455.54 .00 1.595.00 63.00 ob 4.W A/V fJuIIwENT SIT' Y6g1.MAYCf 1 .40 .00 t,000.00 4 ol] CORIA.CTS 15.000.00 1,213.47 1,r45.46 11.214,36 25 • T314L F6UIPAFVT 18,455.00 1.255.62 4,120.44 12.114.56 94 • Lao 214i• SSOi CUSI3]11L SY•PLI•f ANJ E9VII•k4r - -- ASO.. "S1001AL Si R0105 - A.36TFVIDE3 -.._ 6514 SUJPLI.5 1Y4 P61NTTN 6515 1 46.0113N,L 'No PAO4lA•AINs 662. - JILLL.F LMD MEET14G1 - STAFF SSiS YS\(LG! A40 •IFTINGS - TRUSTEES 653J PROF. •i aiFASNIP[ (TRUSTEES) Sa45 601 AND LkGA1 YJ71 C[S 6353 1J0ITIYJ 655v -Aj_�M1pl'G SSSS :04r1Y 90.:47104 U SWI 6530 14MJL SNP• VS4 - -a4VIK iFAA - Ol,f[T0A • i0I 014L 4L 31003 1,300.00 9•.9• 511.02 .00 _ - .01 1.1.2.00 .00 .00 ].005.0. 1t. 35 tt. 1S 6, 5J D. DD _ - SD.•S 1 /2.65 4, 403.00 46..51 1.025.71 400.00 )0•.00 346.03 0 __._.00- -_ 11. 0.01 100.00 .00 10e.0 1 I.510.00 .00 ,00 - 1.000.00 - - -_ 22S..0 609.01 500.04 75.00 19.41 1, .00 .00 1,004.00 -. _ -. 7.9E - -- I,246_4 S 46,496. 00 5.229.]] 21.514.10 976.94 1t 21 .792.)1 ti VT 665 2 1.474. it 21 g4. 00 ) 1 -- 1.)03.00 -04- 0o 104 5 4. -10 o 4.55..00 - .IS .._ 612.59 11 1,30J. 0 " - 1N.90v_ 126__ N.91f. 90 12 00 SPF�IAL 661J :L!Y:LE FAIENDS, 1 1.1.2.00 .00 .00 1.162.00 0 - - - -- X67. - - °L ____ ___ -L, S16.Od. - _.00 -._ -__ .111.25 -- L. 634. +• i S.IJ L3CAL Fa'JIPAf VT 6,004.0. 1.056.16 1.615.29 4,)94.)1 27 6.54 StATf SALES TAI 2.000.30 .00 409.•3 1.394.07 21 2.116.67 601'6 Lai A•4T -J, 401 1 1 1 . 0 0 -- X1).)13..54- --SSS. NS -Q ).2)S,OSl.11 - -11_ "• L- SOT.6Li -- - - -N 1, -. - _115. ]1L 04--- _499,641.4 .. 1.1)5.01).Ll- 17 -_ • )f0 /• 11 /0144.' PI. 001-T 4711.0 L'491Y 14 I ♦1 HIH 1 SI F9,^ /IS 11111' IINW I&L ST4TL• IOY111 •.5. 1 .,9. 147 OFIINIX 611IOELISE 31 I 3/92 IDRI va'Aw I6e 17'74 1 .1. 1 01 51 1011 Fa. I:CJ }'41 OkS: aIIlIO4 [u4f6f AC IVAL ACIJLC 00.7 - ALI 6 UO'[1 IMIS -9J41M It'R -10 -011. NFrt Rt MCI 7C1 • )IJ LCL.ri, 11 'J 5 1)4 AS5 'YS V 5111[ / ]i'LL .IL 51,)H.)D .u) ,44 a1, 11•. JD 5.1. SIG flO.r ;.19111 11 f D !7,•11. .O0D 0 1 }f 11,1 }I. IS 2S 'lIS S12J :w V•(vA •]0471 '44JIf]wl 1 }5, li.,l5 11, Ai •, 27 4,441,)5 11 C'JY ti 12.,4.0.7 .00 2',611.00 4 V7 P. 51 ?1 L.: LI •.1L. (JUYIT 11 ,fit. 723 .9q 1 ,715.25 ?J,IS..T1 25 5125 513. 4: LEJ] [JUnIt 9_f0 lS, 9 Y 1100 It.13..0 14,116 10 5a.0A.JO !) •132 l auYl♦ 'E4.ILLE 73,.04.01 .00 ,4,151.4) S5,JS..50 27 CO0VTY .1,049.0. .00 U.IJ0. 7J 40,656.00 29 S.IFI C JAI 1 35,912.00 .01 .00 SS. Ili. VO J MFOICIw' [J'JNl7 31,157.0 •,501.00 S,301.00 32,05..U0 1• 5 1 4 1 A)•LFT)V 1,611.00 .00 ?,419.25 1,251.11 25 SEVSOM )t.155.00 .YO 1L. FAIAFA7 9,9[1.0' .00 -. 7. y1. 7J }.4 H.40 25 9 1123 FL'N(a•. ' 1A,6?7.00 .00 7.219. 2s 71. .3/. IS 25 515i 4.010.00 .00 1,701. SJ ).021.50 1) 5160 0A6NIIE FALLS 21.110.00 .00 5,12 11."2.10 _ 15 MJTCK14SOI 4NA40YE4 61.051.09 I5.1sl. }S 15. 41.261.13 25 MI 1D __ IITC.FI,LO 4.140.00 ♦4,991.00 .00 1.011,0 _ A. - 25_ $172 OLIVIA 22,131.019 ,05 ILtN.T> 11,113.25 25 51 OATJMV7LLE 13 00 .00 ,vo 5.1.4.23 1, ][f.00 1•,}51.}5 1,913.00 25 ?5 VIU 5115 •ILLMAR BIRO ISLAND 101,056.00 .00 15.4.4.0' 7,,) 25 5191 9 . 9 29.00 .00 2.462.OD 1,44'.00 25 5 195 -DAr1DN _. _ 4EC104 13,143.00. __ .00_ __ _ 3.267.00 _.- f. •01. 00-- 2J__ 5.723 1.01504 0,661.00 9.1 is 2.111.75 ',515.[3 25 = l05 RE 14,9.0.01 .00 1,735.00 11,205.00 1Y SRI _ _._ -_ CASs RE:EI.TS L SALE! Tll 11,169.0'- -_ 30,000.09 2.112.25 _ _- 2,732.23 _ a.376. 75_13 5420 GI -tS 1, 614. 16 7 ,113.69 42. L46. 11 16 SUD_-1 91"0.2)3 S,ODD.00 6.3.0.10 _ .00 _ __ 12.756.30 _ -- .O1 __12, 1.000.00 J • TOTAL AECEIMT3 1.411.113.0 191.341.36 - 349,329.24 1.096.)BS.76 24 • 7 ?D LEI AOJSEMk Nif (LOCAL COVE R4MFN11 - - -- - -_ -- -� - - -- -- 5001 7k IM9JRSE ME NT S- CNI•IE 6A COUATY(F[ASUYNFL 16.216.00 Is.90J.00 15.000.00 3.211.00 62 SI23_ S .3O REIASUASE EWZL 3L1VIAJA11EAIALS ONLY) R.IMSJRSERENTS _ 2.671.0 _ _ _ _.00._ ___ - 00-- _ _�.6T).0 a - OEM!ON IAIIFRIALS ONLY) 1,300.00 I.SOJ.DO 1,500.CD .00 10. 5649 REINS - CNIrnENA :OUNTT (MAIEATALS ONLY) 15,000.00 .00 250.00 I..FSJ.00 2 -_ 5d4 REINS - _90VTEVIDFJ IMATLI.IALS DNL1) 10.ODO.0 5.00"b* __ _ _ _.7,022.10_ ♦./11.50 • TOTAL REIROUSEMENIS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT) 41,6171 p 21, 102. !• II.1f2.S0 _ 21,161.!0 16 • 030 OI 4E9 h SHOJI SFREN 5173 OISER Ril45URSE4FMIS 1.500.0' .00 35.70 5,461.)0 J_ 1014L OTNER RLIABVRSEMEMT3 - 3,SDO.00 _ .0 _ __ _ __ 11.70 . _ _ J.464.)B 1_ ! _ 050 JCYiR_FYSJS _ 1115 _. 5930 40JNAf1 DN FVRO 61FLCOE FYND .p 172.5• 1.194.10 3,194.30- _ - a -- .00 100.0 1 ".00 10.0- 0 9513 LOCAL E _ _-__- JUI lA4T [ qSC FLlA4(OUS _ _ -3.00.00 6.000.00 _4.230.00 _ _ - -- 150. ".___ TOTAL R OTHER FUMOf 11.00.00 --- .0 172.30 - .DO /,944.50 ..00.00 ).OSf. 30 0 71 - •• IDIAI IISRRIIT -- -- -- - -- - 1,509,032.00 211.111.16 _ ... F1 MAL TOTAL$ 42 ACCOUNTS 31509,232.00 211.116.54 129,061.55 1, 110. 710. D1 25 • AGENDA • CONTINUED REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 1992 1. Call to Order - 11:30 A.M. 2. REFERRED ITEMS FROM MARCH 10, 1992 (a) Consideration of Proposal from Inspec, Inc. for Tennis Court Rehabilitation with Hutchinson Public Schools (DEFERRED FEBRUARY 25, 1992) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement (b) Consideration of Exercising All Remaining Options for Phase II Downtown Redevelopment Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (c) Consideration of Settlement with Insurance Company Regarding Junker Litigation • Action - (d) Consideration of Recommendation from Refuse Contract Committee that Commercial/ Industrial Entities Obtain Refuse Service from Private Sector At Earliest Date Established By City Attorney /State Law Acton - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (e) Consideration of Proposals for Cable Television Technical Audit Action - 3. Adjournment PJ 0 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT AND WAIVER THIS AGREEMENT, is made on the date hereinafter set forth, by and between the City of Hutchinson, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and Independent School District No. 423 of McLeod County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the District. WHEREAS, in consideration of action by the City Council, at the District's request, to cause construction related to the Rehabilitation of Joint Tennant Tennis Courts at Park Elementary School in Hutchinson, to be described as City Project No. 92 -13, and to assess the District for up to $4,000.00 of the cost for the color coating and striping, as well as 50% of all remaining costs. Based on the preliminary estimate of $34,000.00 for total construction, including $4,000.00 for color coating and striping, the fair apportionment of the costs of said improvement shall not exceed $19,000.00, which shall be assessed either for a period of ten (10) years, or paid in full prior to October 1, 1992. The District expressly waives objection to any irregularity with regard to said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against District's property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts. • IN TESTIMONY, WHEREOF, Glen Hatejka, Superintendent of Schools, has hereunto set his hand this 12th day of March, 1992. Glen Hatejka, Superintendent Hutchinson School District No. 423 IN THE PR ENCE OFD S gnature Betty A. Nielsen _ Print Name Drafted byi John P. Rodeberg Director of Engineering 37 Washington Ave. West Hutchinson, MN 55350 • (612) 587 -5151 3/12/1992 i i Signature Carole R. Solie Print Name 02 -A I ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW DAVID B. ARNOLD • HART D. MCDOWELL STEVEN &.ANDERSON O. BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. ROOF I UHA E. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEO(Ht A PAUL D.DOVE" JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD 6. MCOEE TIMOTHY W. FAFINSEI MARY E. HORROCXS CATHRYN D. RE HER March 13, 1992 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (612) 587 -7575 PAX (612) 567 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Krammer Enterprises (Laundromat) Hutchinson Downtown Development Our File No. 3244 -91046 Dear Gary: OF COBNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C.LAI.LIER PAUL M.BEOICH C HARTER R.CARMICHAEL" 5881 CEDAR I.ABE ROAD MINNEAPOMS,MTN SOTA 55416 (6I2) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 800 - 343 -4545 FAX ( 612) 545 -1793 501 SODTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, XD SOT& 59371 (612) 389-2214 FAX (612) 389-5506 t121 � h'.i? 1592 N' 0 RECEIVED v • Enclosed and sent to you by hand delivery please find the Agreement between Joe Krammer Enterprises, Inc. and the City. Estimates of the moving expenses for the laundromat were close to the total compensation to be paid. If Krammer goes out of business, he would be entitled to only $20,000. On the other hand, if he stays in business, he might very well be entitled to more than $40,000. The compromise position, pay him for his relocation costs and allow him to decide whether or not he wishes to relocate, appears reasonable. If the Council approves, we will close this transaction this afternoon. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & W L j L t L G. Barry Anderson GBA:lm • Enclosure CC R.J. McGraw 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST EY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION q "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPER= LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION s AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _ day of March, e 1992, by and between Joe Krammer Enterprises, Inc., ( "Krammer ") , a Minnesota corporation and the City of Hutchinson ( "Hutchinson ") , a municipal corporation. RECITALS: 1. Krammer is the.owner of a laundromat located in a building owned by Hutchinson Elks, Inc. of Hutchinson, Minnesota. 2. Hutchinson presently holds an option with Hutchinson Elks, Inc. for the acquisition of the building, land and fixtures in connection with a program of downtown redevelopment. 3. The parties hereto have entered into negotiations prior to any action by Hutchinson. 4. Krammer is entitled to compensation for the balance of his lease with Hutchinson Elks, Inc. and his relocation costs • associated with the acquisition of property in connection with the downtown redevelopment project. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES in consideration of the mutual promises and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency which are hereby acknowledged as follows: 1. Relocation Payments and Compensation. Hutchinson will pay Krammer the sum of Forty Thousand and no /100 Dollars ($40,000.00) contemporaneously with the execution of this agreement. This sum represents full, final and complete compensation for all relocation -1- • benefits owed to Krammer as well as any damages payable to Krammer • under Chapter 117 of Minnesota Statutes including but not limited to any compensation due Krammer for the balance of Krammer's lease with Hutchinson Elks, Inc. 2. Possession Date. Hutchinson shall have possession of the premises no later than May 1, 1992. Krammer shall pay for all property expenses including but not limited to rent, utilities and property maintenance expenses, if any, up to and including May 1, 1992. Krammer shall continue to provide liability coverage on the premises until and including May 1, 1992 in at least the amount of 3. Retention of property. Krammer shall retain ownership of all washers, dryers, air conditioners, water heater, water storage tank, water softener, copper water pipes and copper faucets, • electrical fittings, vents, gas lines and all personal property not otherwise affixed to the building or foundation. If any of the above items are not removed by May 1, 1992, they will be deemed abandoned and ownership and possession shall become the property of Hutchinson, time being of the essence in this agreement. Any property removed by Krammer pursuant to this clause shall be done in such a manner so as not to damage the structural integrity of the building or to create a safety or health hazard. 4. Waiver of relocation benefits. The payment described above is in full satisfaction of Krammer's relocation benefits and compensation owed to Krammer, if any, for the remaining term on -2- • Krammer's lease and any other damages awardable to Krammer under Chapter 117 of Minnesota Statutes. Krammer voluntarily waives any • relocation assistance, services, payments or benefits that Krammer would otherwise be eligible for and enters into this agreement with the express understanding that the payments made by the City of Hutchinson pursuant to the agreement are made in reliance upon Krammer's agreement to waive such relocation assistance, service, payments and benefits. Hutchinson agrees that it will make the payments called for under this agreement regardless of whether or not Krammer relocates his business within the city limits of the City of Hutchinson and Krammer agrees to waive any further claim against the City regardless of whether or not Krammer relocates the business within the city limits of the City of Hutchinson. Both parties agree and acknowledge that a good faith effort has been • made to estimate the relocation benefits owed to Krammer and the amount paid to Krammer is the result of this effort. 5. Water hookup and sewer access charges. Krammer shall not be required to pay for hookup or sewer access charges to Hutchinson if the business is relocated within the city limits of Hutchinson within three (3) years of May 1, 1992. After May 1, 1995, Krammer shall be responsible for hookup and sewer access charges in accordance with then applicable Hutchinson policy. Hutchinson shall not be responsible for, at any time, the cost of extending utilities to the property to be occupied by Krammer. -3- 0 It 6. Licenses and permits. Hutchinson will not unreasonably • require or withhold any requests for licenses or permits to operate with Hutchinson. 7. Pro -rate utilities. Krammer shall be responsible for payment of utilities, rents, taxes, if any, through April 30, 1992 and will notify the necessary parties of the change in ownership and responsibility. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. JOE KRAMMER ENTERPRISES, INC. By: Joe Krammer, Jr. Chief Executive Officer • CITY OF HUTCHINSON By: Paul L. Ackland, Mayor By: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF MCLEOD ) Gary D. Plotz City Administrator On this day of March, 1992, personally appeared before me a Notary Public, Joe Krammer, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of Joe Krammer Enterprises, Inc., and who executed the same on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public • -4- ` f STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF McLEOD ) On this day of March, 1992, personally appeared before me a Notary Public, Paul L. Ackland and Gary D. Plotz, Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson and who executed the same on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:' G. Barry Anderson ARNOLD & McDOWELL 101 Park Place Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Telephone (612) 587 -7575 Attorney I.D. No. 196X • -5- • March 13, 1992 ARNOLD & McDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 301 PAPS PLACE AUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350-2563 OF CODNSEL M TIIAM W.CAHERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL X.HEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICRAEL" (612) 587 -7575 PAX (612) 369 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O.HARRY ANDERSON 3081 CEDAR LAEE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 334L6 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 600-343-4345 FLY(612)543-1793 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Refuse Contract Matter Our File NO. 3188 -92212 501 SOOTS FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 53371 (612) 369 -2214 FAX (612) 369-5306 IJ J J ° NIL ,R 1992 t o BY ti 9Z Dear Gary: • Enclosed and sent to you by hand delivery in connection with the scheduled City Council meeting for today at noon, please find enclosed a Notice of Public Hearing. Since we discussed this matter at the City Council meeting this past Tuesday, I have had a chance to speak with Mr. Cairns who represents Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. Based on our discussion, I do not expect a formal response to our settlement proposal until early April. Junker wishes to discuss a variety of issues with the City including the possible extension of his contract. The City is not obligated to extend his contract. If we are going to use an organized collection system for residential solid waste, however, we do have to give notice under the statute and we are required to negotiate first with him pursuant to the statute. Since the statute requires two weeks notice in order to make absolutely certain that we don't trip over a procedural requirement, I am recommending that we publish notice and the earliest notice could be published would be this coming Tuesday. This would mean the earliest the hearing could be help would be Wednesday, April 1, 1992. • CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL THIAT SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE DAR ASSOCIATION l �\ 'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION (�/1/[`/� DAVID B. ARNOLD GARY D. MCDOWELL • STEVEN A. ANDERSON O.BARRY ANDEHSON STEVEN S. HOPE I URA E. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRIIEOOEMANN PAIL D. DOVE Y. PAIEMENT JAMES DTLEY RICHARD O. MCOEE TIMOTHY W. FAFIN9EI MARY E. HORROCES CATHRYN D. REHER March 13, 1992 ARNOLD & McDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 301 PAPS PLACE AUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350-2563 OF CODNSEL M TIIAM W.CAHERON RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL X.HEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICRAEL" (612) 587 -7575 PAX (612) 369 -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O.HARRY ANDERSON 3081 CEDAR LAEE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 334L6 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL FREE 600-343-4345 FLY(612)543-1793 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Refuse Contract Matter Our File NO. 3188 -92212 501 SOOTS FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 53371 (612) 369 -2214 FAX (612) 369-5306 IJ J J ° NIL ,R 1992 t o BY ti 9Z Dear Gary: • Enclosed and sent to you by hand delivery in connection with the scheduled City Council meeting for today at noon, please find enclosed a Notice of Public Hearing. Since we discussed this matter at the City Council meeting this past Tuesday, I have had a chance to speak with Mr. Cairns who represents Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. Based on our discussion, I do not expect a formal response to our settlement proposal until early April. Junker wishes to discuss a variety of issues with the City including the possible extension of his contract. The City is not obligated to extend his contract. If we are going to use an organized collection system for residential solid waste, however, we do have to give notice under the statute and we are required to negotiate first with him pursuant to the statute. Since the statute requires two weeks notice in order to make absolutely certain that we don't trip over a procedural requirement, I am recommending that we publish notice and the earliest notice could be published would be this coming Tuesday. This would mean the earliest the hearing could be help would be Wednesday, April 1, 1992. • CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL THIAT SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE DAR ASSOCIATION l �\ 'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION (�/1/[`/� I Mr. Gary D. Plotz March 13, 1992 Page 2 I would recommend a special City Council meeting on that date (to avoid delay) even though we would not necessarily need to formally adopt an organized collection system or an intent to organized collection. I would prefer that we adopt a resolution of intent at that meeting to start the time period running. The alternative would be to have the public hearing on the 14th of April at our next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. The only reason why that would pose a problem is that it would delay adoption of the organized collection system until approximately the end of October. This may not be a serious problem and it might make more sense to hold the public hearing at the time of the regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Thank you. Best regards. • GBA:lm Enclosure Anderson • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • This Notice of Public Hearing is adopted by the Hutchinson City Council for and on behalf of the City of Hutchinson on this 13th day of March, 1992. RECITALS: 1. The City of Hutchinson presently receives solid waste collection services pursuant to a written contract between the City and Junker Sanitary Services, Inc.; 2. The contract will expire on June 30, 1992; 3. The City desires to consider the possibility of an organized collection system pursuant to Minn. Stat. §115A.94 (1991); NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota: • 1. A public hearing will be held at the City Council chambers for the City of Hutchinson, Hutchinson City Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 on the _ day of April, 1992 at o'clock .M. to consider the possibility of adoption of an organized collection system pursuant to Minn. Stat. §115A.94 for the purpose of organizing collection of the residential generation of solid waste. 2. The City Administrator for the City of Hutchinson is hereby directed to give notice of such hearing by mailed notice to Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. and to otherwise provide notice as required by law. • Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this _ day of March, Y V-j-IY'M CITY OF HUTCHINSON By: Paul L. Ackland, Mayor Attest: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator • • AP -HOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C.LALLIER PAUL M. BEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" (612) 567 -7575 FAX (612) 387-4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O.HARRV ANDERSON 5BB1 CEDAR IA E ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL. FREE BOO - 343-4545 FAA (612) 545-1793 Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Cable Franchise Our File No.: 3244 -92054 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET FR CEION, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 369-2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 6 � B g101112j R_? 159 3y 1 61 5Z Dear Gary: • I write to you regarding the proposed technical audit of the exist- ing cable system. As you know, I serve as Chairman of the Cable Advisory Committee as well as the President of the Hutchinson Community Network, Inc., a non - profit corporation organized for the purpose of supporting public access television. The same people serve on the Board of Directors for both groups. A joint meeting was held this past Thursday morning. We discussed at some length both the City's budget problems and the absolute critical nature of this technical audit. We need to know, with some technical specificity, whether or not our present system is deficient. We also recognize the presently stressed financial condition of the City. Accordingly, the HCVN Board of Directors voted unanimously to offer a loan to the City of $2,000 of the total audit cost, estimated at slightly over $5,000. It was our thought that the City could then budget to repay those funds, without interest, at some later date or perhaps other arrangements could be made. As I'm sure the Council is aware, the City has long collected 2'h per cent of the franchise fee which has been deposited in the general fund • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TR SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPAT£ BAR As50CIATION S} "CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION DAVID B. AHNOLD GARY D. MCDOWELI. STEVEN A. ANDERSON 0, R. BY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOOE LAURA H.FRETLAND DAVID A. DRUEOO£MANN PAUL D. DOVE" JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY RICHARD O. MCOEE TIMOTHY W. FAFINSHI MARY E. HORBOCHS CATRRYN D. HEHER March 12, 1992 AP -HOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 OF COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON RAYMOND C.LALLIER PAUL M. BEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL" (612) 567 -7575 FAX (612) 387-4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY O.HARRV ANDERSON 5BB1 CEDAR IA E ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53416 (612) 545-9000 MN TOLL. FREE BOO - 343-4545 FAA (612) 545-1793 Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Cable Franchise Our File No.: 3244 -92054 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET FR CEION, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 369-2214 FAX (612) 389 -5506 6 � B g101112j R_? 159 3y 1 61 5Z Dear Gary: • I write to you regarding the proposed technical audit of the exist- ing cable system. As you know, I serve as Chairman of the Cable Advisory Committee as well as the President of the Hutchinson Community Network, Inc., a non - profit corporation organized for the purpose of supporting public access television. The same people serve on the Board of Directors for both groups. A joint meeting was held this past Thursday morning. We discussed at some length both the City's budget problems and the absolute critical nature of this technical audit. We need to know, with some technical specificity, whether or not our present system is deficient. We also recognize the presently stressed financial condition of the City. Accordingly, the HCVN Board of Directors voted unanimously to offer a loan to the City of $2,000 of the total audit cost, estimated at slightly over $5,000. It was our thought that the City could then budget to repay those funds, without interest, at some later date or perhaps other arrangements could be made. As I'm sure the Council is aware, the City has long collected 2'h per cent of the franchise fee which has been deposited in the general fund • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TR SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPAT£ BAR As50CIATION S} "CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION Gary D. Plotz March 12, 1992 Page 2 rather than reserved for cable operations, technical issues, HCVN or other similar types of expenditures. Technically, the money for this audit should probably come from those funds. I direct your attention to Section 33 of the Ordinance as adopted by the City Council on April 2, 1979: Section 33: Should the City of Hutchinson require or request any special technical testing of the cable television system over and above that normally required by the FCC, the City of Hutchinson shall pay the cost for said special technical testing. Should the special technical testing report show that the franchisee's cable television system does not meet those technical standards required of the system by the FCC, then in that event the franchisee shall pay the cost of the testing expense. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions in connection with this matter. I would ask that the City Council authorize the test- Fridav so that we c am. 1] E C AN OPEN LETTER TO GOVERNOR CARLSON March 13, 1992 • • Governor Arne Carlson State Capitol Building St. Paul MN 55155 Dear Governor Carlson, The proposed 71.6 million dollar cut in local government -aid is totally unfair. we have always been willing to share the burden of state aid cuts, however to single -out the cities for the major cuts, with absolutely no local government aid cut for counties, townships and special districts is ridiculous!! We as a city are fully aware of the IR's caucus recommendation, that essentially would be an across the board percentage reduction, except for local government aid. The object of not cutting the local government aids was to protect the newly established LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID TRUST FUND. This Trust Fund is a well thought out concept that is now being RAIDED by you, to pay other statewide shortfalls. the state budget problem. As you well know, the facts clearly show that the cities have had the smallest amount of increase in their budget over the past several years. It seems that those who work the hardest to maintain the lowest tax increase of all the jurisdictions are the ones you are asking again to balance a disproportionate share of Your $320,000 proposed 1992 cuts for the City of Hutchinson, mid -year again, would eliminate all capital outlay expenses; the very few items we have left in the capital budget. The city has had a freeze on city wages this year, including any merit consideration for employees. This includes a freeze on Police Department longevity increase, and in pay for volunteer fire fighters. Even with these cuts, we will not be able to come up with $320,000. City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Prim ted on recycled patxr - Letter to Governor Carlson y 3 -13 -92 Page 2 This marks the THIRD year in a row cities have needed to adjust their expenditures. In 1991 the reduction, mid -year, was over $140,000 for Hutchinson. These reductions were replaced by local tax effort in 1992, and amounts to MORE real estate taxes without any new services. This at a time when you are trying to boost the State's economy. The City of Hutchinson's cut back will have an adverse effect on the great Minnesota economy. A few cities receive no local government aid (ie. Edina, Plymouth, Bloomington, Minnetonka) and are therefore not impacted at all! Is this fair? We were very proud of the fact you chose Hutchinson to deliver your "State of the State" message. You spent the day in our community and surrounding area. You saw first hand the flourishing economy of Hutchinson. This message you have been delivering statewide is because of our success and achievements and ability to handle our funds, yet you are going to take those same essential finances. We strongly urge you to reconsider your proposal and assert the basic principle of sharing the burden among ALL jurisdictions. Allow us to help the Minnesota economy in Greater Minnesota, to keep going in a positive direction. Respectfully, Paul Ackland • Mayor Gary Plotz City Administrator Marlin Torgerson Councilman John Mlinar Councilman Craig Lenz Councilman Don Erickson Councilman Dolf Moon Director of Park /Recreation Hazel Sitz Personnel Director Kenneth Merrill Finance Director John Rodeberg Director of Engineering Steve Madson Chief of Police Randy DeVries Director of Water /Wastewater Brad Emans Fire Chief James Marka Building Official