The URL can be used to link to this page

cp04-28-1992 ci U TCH I IT 0 1\1 CITY CALENDAR- WEEK' OF April 26 TO Mav 2 1 1992 WEDNESDAY -29- 10:00 A.M. - Directors Meetinj at City Hall SUNDAY -26- � e e THURSDAY -30- MO -27- Noon - Safety Council Mee at Heritage Center 1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commission Meeting at Utilities FRIDAY -I- APRIL SHOWER TU`DAY -28- :00 P.M. - Open Bids on G.O. Bonds at City Hall :30 P.M. - Closed City Counci: Meeting to Discuss Potential Litigatia :30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall SATURDAY -2- TEVE MADSON - April 27 -30 (FBI Conf.) M3 5:00 P.M. - Park S Recreatio Board Meeting at Library Conferen Room 7 f AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1992 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Harold McGowan, Bethany Baptist Church 3. Consideration of Minutes Bid Openings of March 17, 1992 and April 13, 1992; Continued Regular Meeting of March 20, 1992; Special Meeting of April 1, 1992; and Regular Meeting of April 14, 1992 Action - Approve as Distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Financial Report - March 1992 2. Senior Advisory Board Minutes of Feb. 13, 1992 • 3. Planning Commission Minutes of March 17 & March 24, 1992 4. Airport Commission Minutes of March 2, 1992 5. Park & Recreation Board Minutes of Feb. 26, 1992 6. Report of City Investments (b) Reconfirmation of Approved Gambling License for Elks Lodge As Requested By State Gambling Board (c) Applications for On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses 1. Crow River Country Club 2. Godfather's Pizza 3. Gold Coin 4. Pizza Hut 5. Little Crow Bowling Lanes 6. Lamplighter's Lounge II 7. J's Sports Bar 40 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 • (d) Applications for off -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor Licenses 1. Cash Wise Foods 2. Erickson Freedom Station (Hwy. 7 & 15) 3. George's Food & Fuel 4. Citgo - Quikmart 5. Southtown Mobil 6. Tom Thumb Food Market 7. SuperAmerica (e) Application for Parade Permit 1. American Legion Post 96 - May 25, 1992 2. March of Dimes - May 17, 1992 Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and reconfirm and issue licenses and permit 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. None 6. Communications Reauests And Petitions • (a) Consideration of Request for Jaycee Water Carnival Permits: 1. Parade Permit 2. Dance Permit 3. Fireworks Permit 4. Permission to close streets and use Library Square Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue permits and waive fees and rentals (b) Consideration of Request for Non - Intoxicating Liquor License and Set -Up License for Jaycee Water Carnival, June 18 -21, 1992 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue license and waive fees (c) Consideration of Request for City Donation to Jaycee Water Carnival Action - is 2 • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 (a) Ordinance No. 92 -54 - Subdivision Ordinance, Public Site And Open Spaces Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first reading and set second reading for May 12, 1992 (b) Resolution No. 9698 - Requesting MN /DOT For Cost Participation On T.H. No. 22 Improvements, Letting No. 3, Project No. 92 -05 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 8. Unfinished Business (a) Consideration of Wellness Program Proposal (DEFERRED JANUARY 14, 1992) Action - (b) Consideration of Transfer of Cable Television Franchise • (DEFERRED JANUARY 28, 1992) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to schedule public hearing (c) Update Status of Word of Life Issues Action - - r (a) Consideration of Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service (b) Consideration of Awarding Bids for: 1. $605,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1992 2. $325,000 General Obligation Refunding Recreation Center Bonds, Series 1992 n U 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 0 3. $1,200,000 General Obligation Refunding Improvement Bonds, Series 1992 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution (c) Consideration of Revokation of Issuance of Liquor License to Mark Gaarder, dba The Hangar Bar & Grill; Flyer's Night Club Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and revoke (d) Consideration of Revokation of Issuance of Liquor License to Steve Picha, dba Hutch Pizza, Inc.; J's Pizza Garten /Sports Bar Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and revoke (e) Review of 1992 General Fund Budget Adjustments Action - (f) Consideration of Licensing for Refuse Haulers • Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second reading for May 12, 1992 (g) Consideration of Authorizing Staff to Advertise for Bids for Interim Garbage Pickup for Service Between July 1, 1992 to October 1, 1992 Action - (h) Discussion of Policy Alternatives for Delinquent And Deferred Assessments Action - (i) Consideration of Policy On Tax Forfeiture Assessments Action - (j) Consideration of Advertising for Bids to Purchase Combination Jet And Vacuum Truck Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve • 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 • (k) Discussion of Hutchinson Area Transportation Services Facility Report Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (1) Consideration of Receiving Report And Calling Hearing On Improvement for Letting No. 9, Project No. 92 -14 & 92 -15 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and accept report and set hearing for May 12, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9699 & 9700 (m) Consideration of Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Advertisement for Bids On Letting No. 4, Project No. 92 -07 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9701 (n) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 1, • Project No. 92 -01 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9702 & 9703 (o) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 1, Project No. 92 -03 & 92 -04 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9704 & 9705 (p) Consideration of Awarding Letting No. 1 /Part B for Project No. 92 -03, Priebe Addition And Project No. 92 -04, Betker's Second Addition Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid 0 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 (q) Consideration of Approving MN /DOT Traffic Control Signal Agreement for Letting No. 5, Project No. 92 -08, Main Street (TH 15) Traffic Control And Signal Improvements Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement (r) Discussion of GIS /GPS Development Action - (s) Discussion of Trebelhorn/Brandt Encroachment And Drainage Issue Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to begin legal proceedings (t) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Francis Condon On Hwy. 15 North for Mini - Storage with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (u) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By • Richard Smith On Roberts Road with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (v) Consideration of Vacation of Utility Easement Requested By Richard Smith In Stoney Point Third Addition with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (w) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Jeff Munsell for Construction of Car Wash On Hwy. 7 West with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 2 is • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 (x) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of First Addition to Peterson Terrace Submitted By Redman Real Estate with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9706 (y) Consideration of Preliminary Plat of Golf View Subdivision Submitted by Kevin Compton with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (z) Consideration of Preliminary Plat Submitted By Skip Quade, Acoma Township, Two Mile Radius, with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and refer to County (aa) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By Dan Huebert, Acoma Township, Two Mile Radius, with Favorable • Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection (bb) Consideration of One -Time Six Month Variance Extension for Cedar Crest Estate with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (cc) Consideration of Rezoning from Agricultural to Residential Requested By Skip Quade, Two Mile Radius, with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with unfavorable recommendation (dd) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Feed Lot Requested By Tim Albrecht, Two Mile Radius, with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with unfavorable recommendation r 1 U 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 • (ee) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to Move Mobile Home Requested By Oliver Johnson with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection lo. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Adjournment 0 • 8 MINUTES BID OPENING TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1992 The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Supervisors Doug Meier and Larry Karg, as well as Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 4343, Invitation for Bids, Purchase of One New Double Drum Vibratory Asphalt Compactor, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read: The bids were referred to Supervisors Meier and Karg for review and a recommendation at the March 24, 1992 City Council meeting. The meeting adjourned at 2:17 P.M. • A INTEREST COMPANY BID NO. 1 BID NO, 2 RATE Aspen Equipment Co. $22,033.00 $ 8,598.20 6.88 Savage, MN 1,333.00 5,514.80 7.02 Carlson Equipment Co. 25,898.00 10,027.92 10.00 St. Paul, MN 6,757.08 11.00 Case Power & Equipment 20,091.00 7,218.50 8.00 • Shakopee, MN 4,659.18 Mpls. Equipment Co. 24,500.00 9,274.00 11.00 Mpls., MN 5,979.00 14.02 Ruffridge - Johnson Eqmt. 22,989.00 -- -- Mpls., MN Sweeney Bros. Tractor 23,950.00 8,520.01 7.02 Burnsville, MN 5,460.95 Vermeer Sales & Service 18,500.00 -- -- Burnsville, MN Ziegler 21,864.00 -- 6.5 Mpls., MN The bids were referred to Supervisors Meier and Karg for review and a recommendation at the March 24, 1992 City Council meeting. The meeting adjourned at 2:17 P.M. • A ....... . . . . . n _,ti.__ �._._._._,w. 'vv ,'!c ,. .. MINUTES BID OPENING MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1992 City Administrator Gary D. Plotz opened the meeting at 2:00 P.M. Also present were Assistant Engineer Cal Rice and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. Mr. Plotz read Publication No. 4359, Notice of Advertisement for Farm Land Rental. The following bid was opened and read: Donald Sitz, Hutchinson, MN Three -Year Bid: 1992 - -$35 /acre 1993 - -$40 /acre 1994 - -$45 /acre Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 4342, Letting No. 1, Project No. 92 -01, 92 -03, and 92 -04, Advertisement for Bids. The following bids were opened and read: Duininck Bros., Inc. $360,771.65 - A Prinsburg, MN 88,421.60 - B • $449,193.25 - Total LaTour Construction, Inc. $355,097.30 - A Maple Lake, MN 90,897.15 - B $445,994.45 - Total Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. $318,319.90 - A Hamburg, MN 86,149.10 - B $404,469.00 - Total The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 2:12 P.M. • • MINUTES CONTINUED MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 1992 1. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 noon by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig Lenz and Marlin Torgerson. Absent: Council- men John Mlinar and Don Erickson. Also present: Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, City Engineer John Rodeberg, City Attorney G. Barry Anderson, Dean Wood of Planning Commission and Jerry Cornell of Utilities Commission. DISCUSSION OF DAKOTA RAIL ISSUES Mayor Ackland stated he had invited members of the Planning Commission and Utilities Commission to the meeting since the railroad issues also pertained to them. City Attorney Anderson reported on the four railroad issues: (1) Les Kouba Parkway, (2) rail car rehabilitation between Bluff Street and Main Street to do car repair work, (3) assessments on Third Avenue N.W., and (4) dispute regarding language and interpretation of two elevator leases. • Attorney Anderson stated Dakota Rail would need a conditional use permit to perform the car repair work. He further report- ed the assessments in question were not attested at the public hearing. The City Attorney suggested alternatives and options regarding the issues. It was his recommendation to discuss this matter further at the regular City Council meeting on March 24 and for the Utilities Commission members to attend the special Planning Commission meeting on March 24 at 5:00 P.M. Attorney Anderson reported some of the options on Phase II properties will expire April 1, 1992. It was necessary to move forward with the Elks and Wigens options. The City At- torney would have additional information for the March 24 Council meeting. 4. The meeting adjourned at 12:50 P.M. IN • MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1992 1. The meeting was called to order at 12:15 P.M. by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig Lenz, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Absent: Councilman John Mlinar. Also present: Finance Direc- tor Kenneth B. Merrill and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ORGANIZED REFUSE COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR RESIDENTIAL ONLY Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read the Notice of Public Hearing, Publication No. 4356. The Mayor stated he had appointed a refuse committee about a month ago to consider alternatives. As of July 1, all commer- cial and industrial refuse would be open to any private hauler. There were several suggestions for residential haul- ing. • City Attorney Anderson reported the organized collection had a two -phase process: (1) discussion with the existing licensed hauler and consideration of proposal(s), and (2) proposals from other haulers if phase one was not successful. The City would need to hold a public hearing to move forward with the Resolution. Lucille Dufresne, 1000 Sunset Street, inquired if the resi- dents would be billed according to the amount of garbage accumulated. She had only one bag per week. Mayor Ackland responded refuse pickup would be on a volume - based garbage collection according to what was produced. Mark Schnobrich, 545 Clinton, asked about the recycling pro- gram. The Mayor stated the Refuse Contract Committee had not addressed the issue, but there would still be recycling. Gentleman from 245 College Avenue commented on business and residential being charged the same rate. He did not feel it was fair. He asked if cardboard would be recycled. • Mayor Ackland reported the committee was trying to determine the definition of a business. If a residential unit could qualify for up to a 90- gallon container, it would be classi- fied under residential rate. Anything over that amount would 1�f SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - APRIL 1, 1992 • be negotiated with the hauler and categorized at a commercial rate. State law dictated that after January 1 grass clippings and leaves could not go to the landfill. The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to close the hearing at 12:35 P.M. The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and waive read- ing and adopt Resolution No. 9691. 3. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR LIQUOR STORE CONDOMINIUM UNIT WITH ERICKSON'S DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION City Attorney Anderson reviewed the revised document. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Tor - gerson to approve the agreement as drafted, with the City At- torney to address the proposed changes on page 9 (ii), page 11 -D regarding wording of "not less than," and the common roof repair issue. Motion seconded by Councilman Erickson and • unanimously carried. The City Attorney reported on the closing with Krammer Enter- prises. Following discussion, the motion was made by coun- cilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve. City Attorney Anderson updated the Council on the latest developments regarding the railroad issues. The meeting adjourned at 1:30 P.M. • • MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 1992 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson, and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. • • The invocation was given by the Reverend Harold McGowan. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the public hearing of February 25, 1992, regular meetings of March 10, 1992 and March 24, 1992, and continued regular meeting of March 13, 1992 were approved as distributed. • (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - MARCH 1992 2. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 30, 1992 3. REFUSE CONTRACT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1992 (b) USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE ON APRIL 25, 1992 FOR GREEN -UP CLEAN -UP DAY (c) RECONFIRMATION OF APPROVED GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 40 S 8 AT AMERICAN LEGION AS REQUESTED BY STATE GAMBLING BOARD The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to order report and minutes filed, approve the request and recon- firm license. (a) INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR J'S PIZZA/ SPORTS BAR, STEVE PICHA OWNER Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read the notice of hearing. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 9 Councilman Erickson moved to close the hearing at 8:01 P.M. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani- mously carried. Mr. Steve Picha stated Hutch Pizza, Inc. was dissolved, and he would be the operator of both operations. Following considerable discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and issue a one -year license. (b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 92 -09 (OLD IVY LANE CONCRETE APRON IMPROVEMENT) Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:18 P.M. and read the notice of hearing. Engineer Rodeberg expressed concern regarding the speed of traffic in the area. He stated a petition was re- ceived from 11 of the 12 property owners opposing the project. • The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to close the hearing at 8:20 P.M. Jerry Nass, 625 Main St. S., stated he attended two other meetings regarding the alley project. He stated narrow- ing up the apron would not cure the problem. The problem started when Main Street was redone. Mr. Nass said he understood the City would take care of the alley, but now there was a cost involved. He questioned how the City could assess residents without an Ivy Lane address for an alley improvement. The people living on the street are on fixed income. He signed the petition because he did not feel the residents should pay the assessment. Mr. Nass wanted it left the way it was, with the frost boils dug out. He commented something should be done for street control and divert some of the traffic. The City Engineer reported the area was vacated to an alley because no one was using it as a street. The land was returned to the private property owners. It did not look like a street since other streets had a 30 foot apron. He stated someone had to pay for the assessment. Engineer Rodeberg commented it would cost $3,000 for the work the City could not do itself. . CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 Mr. Bloom, 605 Main St., questioned why he should pay for the assessment. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to reject the project and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9696. (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO CONDUCT CROP WALK FOR THE HUNGRY ON MAY 2, 1992 Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve. (a) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -56 - SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE; CITY CODE: CHAPTER 11, APPENDIX A The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive second reading and adopt. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 9692 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NOS. 92 -01, 92 -03 & 92 -04 The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 9693 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NOS. 92 -02 & 92 -09 The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. (d) RESOLUTION NO. 9694 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $156,250 FROM HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive • reading and adopt. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 (e) RESOLUTION NO. 9695 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. B. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION AT LAMPLIGHTER LOUNGE II LOCATED AT PLAZA 15, GARY LANDREVILLE OWNER Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve and set a public hearing for April 28, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY KEITH GUNDERSON FOR ASSESSMENT PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR LOT LOCATED BY VICTORIAN INN Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to table. (c) DISCUSSION OF MAINSTREET REQUEST FOR POPCORN WAGON IN LIBRARY SQUARE Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and authorize the City Attorney to prepare a franchise agreement. (d) DISCUSSION OF LOCATING FARMERS MARKET BY LIBRARY SQUARE FOR 1992 SEASON Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve location. (e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING FUEL CONTRACT FOR 1992 -93 Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman • 4 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to award contract to low bid of Cenex. (f) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR VIBRATORY ASPHALT COMPACTOR Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani- mously carried, to award bid for $18,500 to Vermeer Sales and Service. (g) CONSIDERATION OF CRACKFILLING EQUIPMENT PURCHASE Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve $21,070 for the purchase of crack - filling equipment. (h) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 WATER /SEWER FUND REIMBURSEMENT TO GENERAL FUND • Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve reimbursement. (i) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING MAY 1 DEADLINE FOR PROPOSAL FROM JUNKER SANITATION FOR REFUSE SERVICE City Attorney Anderson stated the City had to comply with the Statute of a 90 -day waiting period to negotiate with the present hauler, Junker Sanitation. He suggested a date of May 15. Attorney Anderson reported there was a bill before the Legislature to extend the interim hauling until October 1. On January 1, 1993 there will be an ordinance to license all haulers. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to give Junker until May 15, and then proceed. (j) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING WATER STORAGE TANK ENGINEERING CONTRACT Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and award the contract to RCM. • 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 (k) DISCUSSION OF OLD MUNICIPAL LANDFILL MITIGATION Engineer Rodeberg reported on the background of the issue. He stated it would cost $8,800 to complete the preliminary study and mitigation. The City had requested funding from the McLeod County Solid Waste Abatement Fund to help defray the cost of the study and to meet MPCA re- quirements. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous- ly carried, to approve subject to County funding. (1) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING HEARING DATE REGARDING CROW RIVER DAM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to approve and set hearing for April 22, 1992 at 7:00 P.M. A (m) DISCUSSION OF 1992 AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT • The Director of Engineering reported on the proposed air- port expansion. He stated Federal Transportation funding might be available later this year, with matching City funds, to cover the $150,000 cost of the improvement. The City Engineer requested approval of three items to proceed with the project. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the three items. (n) CONSIDERATION OF MCLEOD COUNTY PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CSAH 8 (AIRPORT ROAD) (DEFERRED JANUARY 28, 1992) Engineer Rodeberg recommended the easements be given to McLeod County at a one dollar sum and the "other good and valuable considerations" noted in the easements be nego- tiated with the County. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous- ly carried, to approve the recommendation and enter into temporary slope easement with the County. is 6 Cl CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 (o) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING SPEED LIMITS ALONG AIRPORT ROAD The Director of Engineering commented on the speed limit along the fringe road. He did not want it to be a resi- dential speed or reduced less than 45 m.p.h. It would require State approval to reduce the speed limit. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous- ly carried, to approve and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9697. (p) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR RENTAL OF FARM LAND BY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and enter into lease with Don Sitz. • (q) DISCUSSION OF REORGANIZATION OF LEGAL AFFAIRS FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON City Attorney Anderson stated the bulk of the routine issues were related to the Police Department. It was his firm's proposal that the City increase its budget by $10,000 for city attorney activities in 1992 and in sub- sequent years. An assistant city attorney would be hired by the law firm of Arnold & McDowell, including benefits, but have an office in the Police Department. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve $10,000 a year for an assistant city attorney and to provide staff support and an office in the Police Department. (r) CONSIDERATION OF EASEMENT RELEASE FOR BRUCE AND TRACI FENSRE Engineer Rodeberg stated the easement did not effect the Fenske parcel and could be released. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and sign the release of easement. • 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 (s) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONDOMINIUM (LIQUOR STORE) The City Attorney reported he was waiting for the final copy of the agreement. No action was taken. 1 y • (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR City Administrator Plotz reported on the joint Council and Utilities Commission meeting held last night. He commented that the Utilities had offered the City a suburban van and lawn mower tractor in exchange for free mowing services. The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and enter into agreement. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM FAIR BOARD REPRESENTATIVES A Tim Ulrich and Jim Haugen presented a drawing of the pro- • posed fair grounds layout. Discussion followed regarding some of the concerns related to the project. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN JOHN MLINAR Councilman Mlinar commented on the letter from Briggs and Morgan. He asked if there was some concern regarding the members of the Refuse Committee. Councilman Mlinar also inquired about the cable television issue. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN MARLIN TORGERSON Councilman Torgerson stated it was brought to his atten- tion that Pishney Lane had parking on both sides of the street. Since emergency vehicles could not get through, it was his suggestion to limit parking to one side of the street. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN DON ERICKSON Councilman Erickson commented on the letter received from Word of Life. He inquired about the status of the issue. • 0 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 (f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney reported he had met with D.D. Cable. It appeared the company qualified from a legal stand- point. Attorney Anderson stated a disciplinary hearing would be held on May 5. The Police Commission chairman requested authorization to hire legal counsel for the Commission. The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun- cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the re- quest, subject to $5,000. City Attorney Anderson commented on the Dakota Rail is- sues. He presented a two -part settlement with the Les Rouba Parkway and the utilities land. The City could take two approaches: (1) go back to Dakota Rail with the suggestion of assessments as previously discussed as a settlement offer, or (2) go to Dakota Rail with condem- nation to enforce the original option. • The City Attorney requested the City hire Dorsey & Whitney as legal counsel in a lawsuit since he could be called upon as a witness. The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve Dorsey & Whitney as legal counsel. (g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Engineer Rodeberg reported he was working with the County to rebuild the street after the detour was removed. An agreement between the County and State would make it a state aid highway while the detour is in effect. The City Engineer stated McDonald Drive, which goes past the trailer court, was being platted and would be re- corded. The property owner would dedicate the land to the City at no cost if the City would do the platting. (h) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR Mayor Ackland expressed concern regarding a newly opened restaurant /bar which was not operating according to ordi- nance requirements. He also questioned the name which was different than the one given on the application. 9 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 0 Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to establish the date of April 17 for food to be served or the operation would be shut down. (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds. / / Ww W There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M. i • 10 MARCH 1992 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS MARCH 1992 27,813.00 YOUTH CENTER - "DRY DOCK" 27.6% OPERATING SUPPLIES �EVENUE REPORT CURRENT YEAR TO 3,554.91 BALANCE PERCENTAGE 1,844.12 MARCH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED MEMBERSHIPS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ERR ADMISSIONS 68.00 283.00 863.00 580.00 32.8% VIDEO GAMES 0.00 0.00 800.00 800.00 0.0% POP 180.25 598.22 1,600.00 1,001.78 37.4% CANDY 115.15 248.90 1,000.00 751.10 24.9% CHIPS, ETC. 241.49 368.00 3,400.00 3,032.00 10.8% INTEREST 144.05 144.05 500.00 355.95 28.8% BLDG RENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FUND RAISERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 29,250.00 41,900.00 12,650.00 69.8% TOTAL 748.94 30,892.17 50,063.00 19,170.83 61.7% EXPENSE REPORT PERSONEL SERVICES 2,214.53 7,666.58 27,813.00 20,146.42 27.6% OPERATING SUPPLIES 372.63 1,345.09 4,900.00 3,554.91 27.5% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 1,844.12 4,889.43 11,600.00 6,710.57 42.2% MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.0% OUTLAY 750.00 3,865.83 5,250.00 1,384.17 • CAPITAL TOTAL 5,181.28 17,766.93 50,063.00 32,296.07 35.5% YOUTHCTR ATTENDANCE Y.T.D 21 DATES 372 871 • . l A. (2) MARCH 1992 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND • TAXES LICENSES PERMITS AND FEES INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE CHARGES FOR SERVICES FINES & FORFEITS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES TOTAL EXPENSE REPORT GENERAL FUND MAYOR & COUNCIL CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK ELECTIONS FINANCE MOTOR VEHICLE ASSESSING LEGAL NNING Y HALL RECREATION BUILDING POLICE DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER BUILDING INSPECTION EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SAFETY COUNCIL FIRE MARSHALL ENGINEERING STREETS & ALLEYS STREET MAINTENANCE A/C LIBRARY SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER PARK /REC. ADMIN. RECREATION CIVIC ARENA PARK DEPARTMENT CEMETERY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE AIRPORT TRANSIT ENERGY COUNCIL C.D.P. COORDINATRO ALLOCATED TOTAL CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL 1992 CURRENT YEAR TO MARCH DATE ACTUAL 0.00 7,478.09 6,340.00 10,679.00 26,803.93 48,408.44 0.00 34,472.28 34,081.48 88,328.39 3,624.83 7,260.64 18,758.78 41,768.80 103,750.00 106,552.00 (1,366.11) 58.18 STATEMENTS MARCH 1992 ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE BUDGET REMAINING USED 1,804,470.00 22,645.00 122,400.00 1,328,208.00 697,348.00 50,800.00 134,195.00 517,000.00 250.00 191,992.91 345,005.82 4,677,316.00 4,332,310.18 2,936.95 10,317.19 13,192.16 48,470.44 1,418.84 2,719.71 15,222.85 72,151.33 6,607.06 24,190.92 0.00 0.00 3,347.00 9,941.60 210.10 539.60 3,038.82 11,572.64 1,631.98 6,532.67 77,537.32 268,945.89 13,295.32 27,115.77 2,685.78 8,998.46 7,009.44 25,388.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,024.96 13,721.37 18,374.12 65,229.07 24,556.22 88,034.66 5,485.76 17,911.38 918.96 18,788.75 5,930.24 20,305.13 9,288.61 29,220.01 4,983.26 22,132.50 18,020.82 54,866.59 27,603.67 98,004.04 2,958.92 11,825.86 2,458.48 8,553.08 700.00 2,100.00 2,846.15 17,892.39 8,112.71 30,459.73 0.00 0.00 16,038.23 96,079.17 21,662.84 92,867.54 0.00 322,097.57 1,204,875.62 49,520.00 170,428.00 10,400.00 258,629.00 75,027.00 22,532.00 43,800.00 7,450.00 47,626.00 61,513.00 1,096,460.00 142,789.00 34,686.00 92,817.00 1,750.00 250.00 51,335.00 256,713.00 431,035.00 77,200.00 78,069.00 93,196.00 113,845.00 161,351.00 126,967.00 463,829.00 63,412.00 33,580.00 43,235.00 212,026.00 115,074.00 50.00 41,129.00 392,748.00 1,796,991.91 11,966.00 73,991.56 1,293,735.72 609,019.61 43,539.36 92,426.20 410,448.00 191.82 39,202.81 121,957.56 7,680.29 186,477.67 50,836.08 22,532.00 33,858.40 6,910.40 36,053.36 54,980.33 827,514.11 115,673.23 25,687.54 67,428.87 1,750.00 250.00 37,613.63 191,483.93 343,000.34 59,288.62 59,280.25 72,890.87 84,624.99 139,218.50 72,100.41 365,824.96 51,586.14 25,026.92 41,135.00 194,133.61 84,614.27 50.00 (54,950.17) 299,880.46 4,870,471.00 3,665,595.38 24.7" MARCH 1992 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1992 MARCH 1992 ENTERPRISE FUNDS 0.00 0.00 RFfUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE 531,800.00 MARCH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED LIQUOR SALES 34,352.87 104,381.58 460,000.00 355,618.42 22.7% WINE SALES 7,909.03 24,690.98 135,000.00 110,309.02 18.3% BEER SALES 54,477.85 159,073.99 710,000.00 550,926.01 22.4% BEER DEPOSITS (9.60) (114.69) 0.00 114.69 6,337.11 MISC. SALES 4,124.45 10,667.34 45,000.00 34,332.66 20,812.69 INTEREST 444.57 3,033.43 10,500.00 7,466.57 28.9% REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 743.50 CASH DISCOUNTS (563.92) (1,136.81) (1,500.00) (363.19) 7,796.67 TOTAL 100,735.25 300,595.82 1,359,000.00 1,058,404.18 22.1% EXPENSE REPORT 2,156,003.54 25.4% LIQUOR FUND PERSONEL SERVICES 10,111.88 36,504.68 132,748.00 96,243.32 27.5% SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 72.19 402.41 3,350.00 2,947.59 12.0% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 4,311.95 7,220.97 38,600.00 31,379.03 18.7% MISCELLANEOUS 50.00 355.00 8,800.00 8,445.00 4.0% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.0% TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 120,000.00 120,000.00 0.0% COST OF SALES 85,405.74 245,022.90 1,026,776.00 781,753.10 23.9% 0W 0.00 0.00 4,500.00 4,500.00 0,0% TOTAL 99,951.76 289,505.96 1,335,774.00 1,046,268.04 21.7% REVENUE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND FEDERAL GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% WATER SALES 47,855.76 118,727.14 531,800.00 413,072.86 22.3% WATER METER SALES 315.00 1,405.00 8,000.00 6,595.00 17.6% REFUSE SERVICES 63,306.60 161,607.37 666,000.00 504,392.63 24.3% REFUSE SURCHARGE 5,277.36 13,459.96 0.00 (13,459.96) SEWER SERVICES 149,095.35 382,261.02 1,504,000.00 1,121,738.98 25.4% PENALTY CHARGES 1,104.56 6,337.11 15,000.00 8,662.89 0.0% INTEREST EARNED 11,293.37 20,812.69 160,000.00 139,187.31 13.0% S C 0 R E 20,646.00 0.00 (20,646.00) REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 107.00 743.50 3,000.00 2,256.50 0.0% OTHER 71.35 7,796.67 2,000.00 (5,796.67) 389.8% TOTAL 278,426.35 733,796.46 2,869,800.00 2,156,003.54 25.4% EXPENSE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND D` SE 67,269.51 197,705.59 774,816.00 577,110.41 25.5% R 134,350.20 200,925.73 760,750.00 559,824.27 26.4% SEWER 44,629.02 227,622.07 2,014,561.00 1,786,938.93 11.3% TOTAL 246,248.73 626,253.39 3,550,127.00 2,923,873.61 17.6% • SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES FEBRUARY 13, 1992 Board Members Present: Mildred Jensen, Ruby Krueger, Lloyd Mueller, eelia Zeimer, Arne Heil, X- Officio - Arnold Rotzein. Staff Members Present: Barb Haugen, Ruby Hanner Chair Mildred Jensen called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. Minutes were approved as read. Arnold Rotzein reported on the Board's checking account. A variety of fund raising projects were discussed: card recycling, spring dinner, bake sale. A sub - committee including Barb Haugen, Ruby Krueger and Lloyd Mueller was designated to develop plans for a spring fund raising dinner. Barb was also directed to find out about hot dog sales at Cashwise. Staff will be preparing for 1992 concession stand next month. It was suggested to find out more about the summer band concerts. The Board was unanimous in deciding against a spring bake sale. A progress report was given on the Senior Transportation Program, currently ticket distribution is on schedule. The Center anticipates • maintaining a balanced program in regard to funding. Barb Haugen reported that the Elder Mentor Program is off to a solid start. The school system is slow with their requests, however, a few very successful programs have taken place and have created a lot of positive interest. The Board will be deciding on a fund raising goal to reach for 1992 and will make efforts to create more awareness by the community towards the building fund. Staff reported on upcoming tours, programs and activities. The Board will be touring Summit Center in Mankato. Meeting was adjourned at 11 a.m. • MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 17, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 7,30 p.m. with the following members present, E1Roy Dobratz, Dean Wood, Roland Ebent, Craig Lenz, Bill Craig, Tom Lyke (7,4o p.m.) and Chairman Gruett. Also Present, Gary Plotz, City Administrator, John Rodeberg, City Engineer and Jim Harka, Building Official. 2. MINUTES Hr. Craig made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, February 18, 1992. Seconded by Hr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS • (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR MINI- STORAGE City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the staff recommendation to withdraw the request if Hr. Condon does not provide more information by the end of March for the April meeting. Mr. Craig moved to continue the hearing to the April meeting, seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (b &c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DWIGHT BORDSON FOR ADDITION TO NON- CONFORMING HOUSE Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7,35 p.m. with the reading of publication #4348 and #4349 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request for a variance and conditional use permit to allow for the construction of an addition unto a non - conforming house located at 56 Grove St. • Hr. Dwight Bordson explained his request and stated his hardship as the need for additional space in the kitchen and back entry way. There was discussion on the sketch of the home and the two additions proposed. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 17, 1992 City Engineer John Rodeberg, stated the neighboring home • is set back 20 to 30'. Discussion followed on the established setback. Hr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Wood the hearing closed at 742 p.m. Hr. Craig made a motion to approve the variance, seconded by Hr. Wood, and the conditional use permit for both additions, seconded by Hr. Dobratz, the motions carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEFF HUNSELL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAR WASH ON HWY 7 WEST Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7144 p.m. with the reading of publication #4350 as published 'in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request to construct a car wash located on Hwy 7 W and Florida. City Administrator Plotz commented on the proposal and the staff recommendation for a detailed site plan or continue to the April meeting. He presented Hr. Richard Danielson's, neighboring property owner, objections and concerns with the request. Hr. Gary Wurdell, caretaker of a neighboring 4 -plex on • Florida St., stated he and the owner had no objection to the car wash but have concerns with an entrance being placed on Florida St. He suggested that the dance studio access be the same as the car wash onto Hwy 7 West. There was discussion on Florida Street being a narrow street and possible assessment costs. Hr. Lenz moved to defer the request to the April meeting, seconded by Hr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. (e)' CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF ADDITION OF SHORELAND ORDINANCE TO ZONING ORDINANCE Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8t10 p.m. with the reading of publication #4351 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering the adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance as an addition to the Zoning Ordinance. City Administrator Plotz explained the purpose of the 2 • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COHHISSION MINUTES • MARCH 17, 1992 public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting and staff is following the model provided by the state. City Engineer Rodeberg explained the package from the state is mandated but the city staff deleted the portions not relevant to the City of Hutchinson. He stated the State deadline was February 1, 1992. The people most affected are the residents of the city with septic tanks. Those septic systems will have to be recertified. Building Official Harka commented on Section 6.3 regarding nonconforming sewage treatment systems. Hr. Wood moved to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Lyke the hearing closed at 8:33 p.m. Hr. Lenz made a motion to approve the Shoreland Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES TO BE PRESENTED BY JOHN RODEBERG . City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on several rezoning areas within the city. He explained the Special Protection District to protect environmentally sensitive areas. The park areas are to be protected. It does not change anything these are not buildable lots. Hr. Rodeberg explained the area of the Festival Food store should be rezoned C -3. He stated that I -2 or Heavy Industrial should be were the grain elevators are and along Hwy 22 for Municipal uses. The new County Fairgrounds were annexed into the city as R -1 and should by rezoned I -1 (Light Industrial). (b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Building Official Jim Marks presented the proposed city hall plan. 5. OLD BUSINESS NONE 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9,15 P.M. 3 0 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, March 24, 1992 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 5:00 p.m. with the following members present: E1Roy Dobratz, Dean Wood, Roland Ebent, Craig Lenz, Tom Lyke and Chairman Gruett. Absent, Bill Craig Also Present: John Rodeberg, City Engineer and Jim Marka, Building Official. 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY SIMONSON'S LUMBER CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORAGE AND LEAN -TO TYPE BUILDING Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5 :00 p.m. with the reading of publication #4355 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 12, 1992. The request is for the purpose of considering a request by • Simonson's Lumber to construct a 36' x 60' storage building with at 20' x 60' lean -to west of the present building located in an IC -1 District located at 295 1st Ave NE. City Engineer John Rodeberg explained reason for the special meeting in regard to Phase II for Simonson's Lumber to provide construction of a storage shed and the floor elevation is to be 4' above the existing ground to meet DNR standards. He commented on the staff recommendations discussing access, overhead door and elevation. Hr. Dave McGee, Simmonson's, presented an elevation and sketch of the proposed building. He stated they would rather only raise the building 2' as opposed to 4' if possible. Hr. Rodeberg stated the elevation is mandated by the DNR and the city can not deviate from that for insurance purposes. Discussion followed on flood proofing, flood way and elevations of street and buildings. A motion was made by Mr. Lenz to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Wood the hearing closed at 5:1S p.m. • Hr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the request and sited staff recommendations of elevation of the finished floor being 1 foot higher than the 100 year 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 24, 1992 • flood level and DNR approval, no off - loading from the street right -of -way, address parking and move cold storage overhead door to the west side of structure. Seconded by Hr. Lyke who noted the gas service is to be moved also the motion carried unanimously. 3. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 5x30 p.m. • • 2 •-) i Made: Jim Faber seconded by: Joe Dooley Passed: unaminously Hutchinson City Airport Commission Meeting Notes 2 March 92 Meeting called to order 8:10 PM by Dave Skaar Members Present: Joe Dooley, Jim Faber, Dave Skaar, Paul Acklund, John Rodeberg, Doug Meier and Dennis Kahl Additional: Bernie Knutson, Tom Parker TKDA - R. Strege and J. Peterson Motion: Investigate private or city municipal funding and proceed with project at new costs. Motion: Seek additional funding for airport project. Made: Joe Dooley seconded by: Dennis Kahl Passed: unaminously Next meeting 30 March 92 8:OOPM Motion: To adjourn Made: Dennis Kahl seconded by: Mark Lopac passed 9:10 PM MINUTES Parks A Recreation Board February 26, 1992 Members present were Mike Schall, Mike Cannon, John Mlinar and J.P. Auer. Also present were Dolf Moon, John Arlt and Karen McKay. The Minutes dated January 29, 1992 were approved with the addition of a ' clarification in the subdivision ordinance item. Mike Cannon made a motion to approve the minutes, and John Mlinar seconded the motion. The board unanimously agreed. NEW BUSINESS Annual Report - The board received a copy of the 1991 -92 Annual Report, it can be used as a guildline for planning the budget and labor. Subdivison Ordinance - The ordinance has been forwarded to Barry Anderson, the City Attorney, to put together the proper verbage, and continue work on changes int he percentages or formula. It is agree that the ordinance should be simplistic. Dolf surveyed other cities, and their ordinances vary. Park Adoption - Dolf told the board that there is a need for a committment • for the future from the groups adopting parks. The inactive groups will be contacted. Groups such as the Jaycees and Optimists have funded repairs and replacements along with the addition of picnic tables in their respective parks. NEW BUSINE L.C_M_R. Proposal/Review - The Board received and reviewed a copy of the three grant proposals submitted to the legislative Committee on Minnesota's Resources (L.C.M.R.). The projects included clean up and development of the Crow River, the development of an urban fishing pier in the Tartan Park area, and the development of Rotary Park as a barrier free area. If the grants are funded, more specific paper work will be completed. Donations - The Lions Club will be funding the second phase of their park adoption in 1992 which will include a mini shelter and a mini playground with a swing. The A.F.S. will be sponsor the installation of a foot bridge connecting the Luce Line Trail and their park, they will continue to plant trees and install plaques. A large boulder is in place for a sign. Citizens Bank and Firstate Federal Savings and Loan donated counters, furniture, kitchen utensils, booths and tables for the recently relocated Dry Dock. Firstate Federal also continues to sponsor the semi annual brochure, the • monthly Senior Newsletter, and there is one year of planting in Library Square before it is complete. 4 - I-q - ( MINUTES Parks & Recreation Board February 26, 1992 Page two Dry Dock Cpen House - An open house is scheduled for the Dry Dock on Thursday, March 5th. The public will be able to see the new location and equipment. Special events will continue to be scheduled at various locations to promote larger group activities. The monthly rent is $750 with a six month agreement, then the lease will be renogotiated for a 6 -12 month rental period. N.Y_S_C_A. - National Youth Sports Coaches Association is run through the Minnesota Recreation & Park Association. They train and certify coaches, and provide insurance coverage on those coaches. John Arlt is a certified clinician with N.Y.S.C.A. The program has been well received in many communities in the United States. After a brief discussion, J.P. Auer made a motion that the board support the concept of using national standards for coaches to implement in youth sports and sports related programs. Mike Schall seconded the motion, and the board unanimously agreed. Partners i n Friendship - John Mlinar has been contacted by Partners in Friendship. They are requesting funding of $500,000 for a program that provides support for families. Right now they are working with volunteer help. Tennis Court Repairs - The Tennis Association is requesting that an overlay be Put on the tennis courts at Park Elementary. The cost would be $4,000, if done, a major repair could be put off for 5 -10 years. This item was tabled at the last City Council meeting. Adjo - The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. by a motion made by John Mlinar, and seconded by J.P. Auer; the board unanimously agreed. klm 0 • A • CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT March 31, 1992 Amount 300,000.00 550,000.00 500,000.00 373,500.00 310,758.20 400,000.00 500,000.00 1,150,000.00 600,000.00 300,000.00 650,000.00 127,000.00 $5,961,258.20 S 11 4-A ( 6) Date Date Interest Of Of Institution Description Rate- Purchase Maturity --------------------------- Firstate 42- 117168 -5 5.40% 11/14/91 4/16/92 Firstate 42- 120479 -1 5.35% 12/12/91 6/11/92 Firstate 017020942.6 5.35% 12/12/91 7/11/92 TREAS BONDS 644136 7.18% 12/12/91 2/15/2001 TREAS BONDS 644137 7.13% 12/12/91 10/15/98 Firstate 41- 121498 -0 4.30% 12/31/91 4/15/92 Firstate 41- 1214999 -8 4.60% 12/31/91 12/30/92 Firstate 42- 117375 -6 4.50% 1/16/92 4/30/92 Firstate 42- 118337 -5 4.20% 3/12/92 5/14/92 • 5/28/92 Firstate 42- 120527 -7 4.50% 1/16/92 Firstate 5017019886 4.38% 3/26/92 4/30/92 Firstate 41- 121442 -8 5.35% 2/13/91 4/16/92 Amount 300,000.00 550,000.00 500,000.00 373,500.00 310,758.20 400,000.00 500,000.00 1,150,000.00 600,000.00 300,000.00 650,000.00 127,000.00 $5,961,258.20 S 11 4-A ( 6) i Non- intoxicating on -sale and off -sate beer licenses to be acted on by City Council, April 28, 1992: I 1992 NON - INTOXICATING ON -SALE LIQUOR $350.00 Crow River Country Club Godfather's Pizza Gold Coin Pizza Hut Little Crow Bowling Lanes * J's Sports Bar (new applicant) _e�giw Y-B= -(Will no longer be selling beer on Sundays) Lamplighters Lounge II (new applicant) - NON- INTOXICATING OFF -SALE $200.00 Cash Wise Foods Erickson Freedom Station Hwy 7 Hwy 15 George's Food & Fuel • Citgo- Quikmart Southtown Hobil Tom Thumb Food Harket SuperAmerica - * There may be discussion of this license on another agenda item. NOTE: The Underground Bar and Grill will no longer be selling beer on Sundays. rZ -L�-.*>. i H E H O R A N D U H April 21, 1992 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bonnie Baumetz, License Secretary SUBJECT: NON - INTOXICATING ON AND OFF SALE LICENSES Police Chief Steve Hadson has signed and approved the non - intoxicating licenses for the establishments listed in the attachment except for the new license requested by Steve Picha at J's Sports Bar. • 40 APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: J/- /o- z Approved: 1. Name of Organization r �(y�9 /�L cc..r, \ L� Q(Q 2. Address of Organization 35 3 S 1: Phone 587 X54 3. Authorized Officer's Name q 4- Officer's Address �jJ 3 c Phone $ 8 5. Parade Chairman � .�, {, angtia 6. Parade Chairman's Address �l30 �� n.oc —phone 7. Date of Parad I q r19 Assembly Time r), ' p 0 0 8. Location and Description of Assembly Area Rq �� n , �, ,� JQoa S q ,� ,�J( 9. Starting Time of Parade `jL;,S Estimated Time of Termination /o:U 0 - /o:i5 Time 10. Starting Point of Parade , co, i O - L - , 11. Route of p _ � Parade Travel o y I - �� ilu ..vl dF E 12. Termination Point of Pa 13. Approximate Number of Units, '- �'^ and Vehicles which will constitute Parade with Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles cxtt ,,4 a.p c".3o�l cn- 14. Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units 15. Maximum Length of Parade 16. Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade MPE 17. Portion of Street Width Traversed LFA Yq, Approved this [Q day of 19 9 Z upon compliance with the following terms and conditions —7 —— Chief of ,11-F. <2� CITY OF HUTCHINSON City Hall 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 41- 10 -ftL Approved: 1. Name of Organization �IWh DT DI'(YUS - Ce KJf6 l kl1 bf Vl 2. Address of Organization LL S� >1(x�,Q Ufl t_ Nl , 6U I tf I L Phone (pl LI G JL'l 1-(D 5 IpuO k M Fl SZo3D1 3. Authorized Officer's Name 7iVl}syr l �1 4:< Officer's Address ZZ,"A (1( (1v1" Phone 412 -1 52, -US7G 5. Parade Chairman 1 6y K- , vv 6. Parade Chairman's Address 07P-M6 Pnt e N0. c l,lILF11O1t�Sillrinone (1��Z5� �D 7. Date of Parade S ,lnr. aLi M QLII 1902- Assembly Time jL 0J 8. Location and Description of Assembly Area W ')p R cit - f r PC&Y 9. Starting Time of Parade j A D t� Estimated Time of Termination 10. S Starting P Point o of Parade W WjjQ ± ± r K Yf r� 11. R Route of P Parade T Travel W R RPIAYL n r K�Vt K 3 { ,<b3?6l J JD PCLI1 S St + +Ckaf +Tl y �L� 12. Termination Pbint of VVG�i �1 13. Approximate Number of Units, Animals and Vehicles which will constitute Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles 3P 1/f - m4 V 1 j rtGl,� W 0.1, -k' r r� al VI - A -Tl to t u v�cL 14. Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units 15. Maximum Length of Parade 16. Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade 17. Portion of Street Width Traversed K ---- - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- Approved day of — ( 197i upon compliance with the following terms and conditions MWE APR 1S92 m �=� A 8Y a / UkR�� Chief of Tarade v Yf; tSh rV- A to U A [JUA VAIaLIA/Ol Vl %'ULU=CA l: A . _ � 1 Ju A 61 CROW RIVER I COUNTRY CLUB Hutchinson, MN I, [CON AVE fnaRlmaw s AO CD � a 6 ° 1 IN A, AV I - -{ 72 . MA 1 F0 TN Ar g I ! 12 N AV AT I 1 LA H IV F 5 CdT RY CLUB TERRACE I 1 1 `" i _ MOBILE HOME r .� 27 I 3 �p PARK _ • • r AT(� XIL °` AK S ToCUngh r AUTN® - A I 110 N 47 ri A .I 1 t �� TO Ikhliea TAA1 WEST RIVER J 1 ; , ~ FIN V X A 1 E —•�" PARK G � `� XIXGF011 YF N 1 ' N AV LA' R " 45 l Ole, .e 1 r� � r Y Av' CROW * M Y INf ''�• [1° L T — a S 4 �. Yr F + AVE S 4 TO .� 31 SCCOYO IS V i A HIND AVE N IN _ A 49 THI O AV S fl?* 42 SCHOOL ° n i F O � 4•N 4 ECOLO -Y PARK G RFN A' O t a 4 LC AVE 14' AVE - !N uERL N F F f FTH AVE 4 A, F L` AA K FIAIA W 36 .. 4 Ga1ff ° . VE ` f? 11 _ MI L x f W GO MiL �t s rAF� M H -- J JY t IM A, C IY MO 1 VC YWA f A O AA CRAIG v[ 3 - / NEAL A f A 1Y° OAKLAND i LLMEIERY 2 67 'I 511 Aw. N.W.... a 2 rl 4 clrr.w �- •— I I ov_ IS i " 7 W A , Slh Ave. S.E.....�. H A R 11 Ali LP FW FA 4 a o,w FRf [n0N AVE _. A to U A [JUA VAIaLIA/Ol Vl %'ULU=CA l: A . _ � F AY Ju A TO � rcHE --- -• -- . _ � F AY Ju b [CON AVE AO CD _ H M AV - -{ C I F0 TN Ar AT H IV S E Ae V CO UNTYF� Ole, 4 .� 0 Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival P.O. Box 624 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 2 d5 7 9� Mr. Gary Plotz City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue Hutchinson, MN. 55350 April 3, 1992 �� p} N �1G1.1'.WED r, BY EZ RE: Jaycee Water Carnival Dear Gary: It is that time of the year again to prepare for the annual Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival. As you know, this will be our 50th Water Carnival Celebration. In that regard, we would request that permits be issued for the 1992 Water Carnival as • follows: 1. Close Street and Issue Parade Permit for Kiddie Day Parade on Saturday, June 20th from 12 noon until 1:30 p.m. The same route will be used this year, starting at the South side of Park Towers and continuing around South Park in a clockwise direction to Glen Street. 2. Close Street and Issue Parade Permit for Grande Day Parade on Sunday, June 21st, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Again, the same route will be used this year starting at Lake Street, continue down Second Avenue to Franklin Street, then south on Franklin Street to Linden Avenue. 3. Issue Permit for the Carnival Midway Show June 17th - 21st at West River Park. The Park and Rec Board has been asked to approve this location again for this year. An alternative site can be set for Optimist Park park- ing lot if we have a wet season again this year, or another sight agreeable with the Park and Rec Board. 4. Issue Permit to Sell Food at the Waterski Show and Mud Volleyball Tournament on Sunday, June 21st at West River Park and Les Kouba Park. • 5. Issue Permit for Fireworks Display on Sunday, June 21st at approximately 10:00 p.m. at Les Kouba Point. We will arrange to have the Fire Department stand by if any assistance is needed. 4'A-�B' Gary Plotz Page 2 0 April 3, 1992 6. Mini - Biffs. In the past, the City has taken care of the Mini - Biffs needed for the weekend. We appreciate your assistance with this matter. 7. A non - intoxicating liquor license for liquor sales on the following days: Thursday evening, June 18th, at West River Park; Saturday evening, June 20th at the Civic Arena; and, Sunday afternoon, June 21st at Les Kouba Park. We would also like to sell set -ups at the Civic Arena and have attendees bring their own bottles. The Jaycees would appreciate waiver of any license fees. The Jaycees, as a non - profit organization, would appre- ciate waiver of permit fees and rentals to help defray our expenses. We appreciate all the help and assistance we receive from the City. This community celebration could not be run with- out your help. If you have any questions concerning any of these events, • please don't hesitate to contact me at 587 -2272. Very truly yours, David K. Westlund Commodore DKW:lf A Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival P.O. Box 624 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 2/5 4 9 April 3, 1992 Mayor Paul Ackland Hutchinson City Council City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN. 55350 ZZ RE: Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Member: • The Hutchinson Jaycees are well into the planning stages for the 1992 Water Carnival, it will be our 50th Water Carnival Celebration. This City wide event has enjoyed wonder- ful support from the City and its residents. Last Fall Tim Ulrich and I made a request for a donation from the City of Hutchinson in the amount of $2,000 to help defray expenses on sponsored community events. This amount is $800 higher than prior years. This differance will help offset additional ex- penses for this anniversary celebration. The Jaycees appreciate the difficult decisions that the Council has in allocating its budget, especially in light of the proposed cuts in State funds. However, the Jaycees do feel that this City wide event is a mainstay of the community and surrounding area. The Jaycees sincerely hope that the Council will continue to view the Water Carnival as a valuable celebration for the City. Since this is our 50th annual celebration, we are planning some exciting additions this year. We are bringing back past Royalty. Our parade is being expanded, (we already have 10 High School bands confirmed). We are doubling the size of our fireworks display. There will also be an airshow before the boat parade on Thursday night. These changes and others will make this year special. • APP 1992 RECEDED � -c Mayor Paul Ackland Page 2 April 3, 1992 Hutchinson City Council The Jaycees truely appreciate all of the assis- tance and support that the Water Carnival receives from the City of Hutchinson. Without the aid of the City staff, this Community celebration could not be held. Please let me know when the Water Carnival items are on the City Council agenda. I will plan to attend along with the Vice Commodore, Tim Ulrich to discuss this matter and to answer any questions. Thank you very much for your assistance and consideration. Very truly yours, David K. Westlund Commodore DKW:If 0 — - s. C TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jim Marka, Building Official Dolf Moon, Park and Recreation Director DATE: April 21, 1992 RE: Proposed Revision to Public Site and Open Space Dedication • • The attached language for park land dedication has been reviewed and approved by both the Park Board and Planning Commission, excluding the precentage and dollar figures. As directed by the City Council and after a series of meetings with Alderman Erickson, the attached proposal is in final draft for your consideration CC: Gar Plotz, City Administrator AWATilyn Swanson - City Council Packet City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 A Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - REVISED DATE: April 1, 1992 • Subd. 6. Public Site and Open Spaces. The following requirements are applicable to all subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the Park Board, Planning Commission and City Council. A. In subdividing land or resubdividing an existing plat, due cons iderat.ior) shall be. given to the subdivision and by the Planning Committees upon review, to the dedication or reservation of suitable sites for schools, conservation areas, or open spaces and parks. Where a proposed public park, recreational area or open spaces, as determined by the Comprehensive Plan, or the Planning Commission and Council is located in whole or in part within a subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate such lands to the City; provided, however, that the total dedication (exclusive of public streets, alleys, and pedestrian ways, and exclusive of all other purchased sites such as fire and police stations, water towers and treatment plants and sewer lift stations), shall be consistent with the following requirements: 1. Residential Zoned Subdivisions. For land within a residential zone, formulas for land dedications shall be as follows: (a). Zoning Districts R -1. A land dedication of 7.5% • of the undeveloped site or its fair market land value. (b). Zoning Districts R -2. A land dedication of 12% of the undeveloped site or its fair market land value. (c). Zoning Districts R -3 and R-4. A land dedication of 15% of the undeveloped site or its fair market land value. (d). Zoning District Commercial and I /CI a negotiated percentage of land dedication of the undeveloped site or its fair market land value. (e). Business Park or Industrial Zoned Subdivision. None required. 2. Infrastructure assessments costs incurred with any of the land dedication above shall be calculated and levied against the park or open space by lineal foot of frontage. In no case shall the assessment cost levied againstt the park exceed 60% of the fair market value of the land. A 7- A, 3. For the purposes of this Subdivision, "fair market land value" is defined as the market value of the land within such plat or subdivision as of the date presented to the Council for preliminary approval, as determined by the City Assessor or the sale price, whichever is higher, in the same manner as they shall determine the estimated market value of land for tax purposes, excluding from such determination any value added to such land by improvements serving such land, but including in such determination the highest and best force at the time of the platting. 4. Payment in Lieu of Land Dedication. The City shall have the option of requiring a cash contribution in lieu of the land dedication set forth in item 1. Cash contribution shall be based on the following schedule. (a). Zoning District R -1. A cash contribution of $215 per unit. (b). Zoning District R -2. A cash contribution of $175 per unit. (c). Zoning District R -3 and R -4. A cash contribution of $135 per unit. (d). Zoning District Commerical and I /CI. A negotiated cash contribution based on its fair market land • value. (e). Business Park or Industrial Zoned Subdivision. None required. 5. Partial Dedication and Partial Payment. The City may permit or require the subdivider to provide a partial dedication and a partial payment in accordance with the requirments as set forth above. 6. The cash and land dedication value set forth above shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board on an annual basis and a revised schedule, if any, shall be set forth by the Council. B. When structures are constructed on property which has been previously platted and on which plat no park dedication on record in cash or land was given to the City, a park dedication fee in accordance with the schedules hereinafter set forth shall be paid at the time of the Subdivision agreement or when the building permit is issued. If the park dedication as indicated on record has been previously satisfied at the time of platting in accordance with the requirements then in existence, then no further fee shall be levied. If a partial payment has been made, then the balance of the development shall be charged the rate set forth in Item 1, above. • C. When the building permits are issued on property which is not platted and is not required to be platted prior to receiving a building permit, a fee shall be paid at the time of building permit • issuance in accordance with the above schedule. D. Sums of money so received by the City shall be placed in a special account to be known as the Public Sites and Equipment Fund and allocated by the Council solely for the acquisition of land or purchase of equipment for public parks, recreation areas of open spaces, development of existing parks and recreational areas, or debt retirment in connection with the land or equipment previously acquired for parks, recreational areas, or open areas. E. Soil, Water and Wetland Conservation. Pursuant to State Statute, the following may be required: The subdivider shall be responsible for providing site development plans with provisions for the control of drainage, erosion, siltation and wetlands restoration if said plans are considered necessary by the City Engineer for the purpose of soil, water and wetland conservation. F. The Council, at its option, in high density zoning districts, may require a developer to create a private entity to maintain some form of on -site recreation for use by the site's residents, specifically preschool children. This requirement may be in addition to the dedication of land or cash for park or recreation purposes. Reference Section 8.07 required play area of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance. Source: Ordinance No: is Effective Date: • RESOLUTION N0. 9698 i REQUESTING Hn /DOT FOR COST PARTICIPATION ON T.H. NO. 22 IMPROVEMENTS LETTING NO. 3 PROJECT NO. 92 -05 WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson proposes to make certain improvements on a portion of Trunk Highway No. 22 located in the City of Hutchinson in McLeod County, between Washington Avenue and Fair Avenue S.E., and BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson that the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, is requested to provide cost participation for improvements on the aforesaid portion of Trunk Highway No. 22, consisting particularly of curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, and roadway reconstruction and considered as construction and improvement of said roadway. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that following approval by the Minnesota Department of Transportation of plans and specifications for said improvements on said trunk highway and before a contract is awarded for the construction of said improvements, the Department of Transportation shall enter into an agreement with the City of Hutchinson which shall provide that the Department of Transportation shall pay its share of the cost of the requested improvements as determined by the Department of Transportation in keeping with its latest edition of Mn /DOT Directive - Basic Policies and Procedures, Cooperative Construction Projects with Municipalities fa copy of which has • been received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation's District Engineer) and, that if the City of Hutchinson lets the construction contract, the Departments of Transportation will deposit with the City of Hutchinson, upon demand, after the execution of the agreement and before the start of construction, a sum equal to an estimate of the Department of Transportation's share as prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April , 1992, Mayor City Administrator C J i C April 23, 1992 MEMO TO: MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOHN RODEBERG, STEVE MADSON, DOLF MOON, 8 KEN MERRILL - WELLNESS COMMITTEE SUBJECT: WELLNESS PROGRAM The Wellness Committee has been meeting and proposed a list of alternatives to a wellness program for City Employees. The committee then meet with City Council representatives and employee representatives. As a result of these meetings and an employee survey the following is recommended for city council approval. The committee recommends that the City enter into a wellness • monitoring program with Hutchinson Community Hospital for all full time employees. The program would be funded from revenues in the self insurance fund which has accumulated due to interest earnings and excess funds from previous years. We estimate a cost of $4,500 for the basic program before any additional classes or follow up. The program would be evaluated on a periodic basis to insure participation by employees and how effective the program is performing. The purpose of the program is to keep people healthier and aware of potential problems before these problems become more serious. We have attached a copy of the employee survey results as well as information from Robyn Erickson, Director of Education and Marketing, Hutchinson Community Hospital. Robyn Erickson will be attending the meeting to explain the program and alternatives to the program. • City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -Printed on recycled pnt•cr 10MIf Hutchinson Community Hospital can provide a number of options for you in determining an appropriate wellness program for the City • of Hutchinson employees. Please consider the following in choosing the option that best satisfies your needs. AN EFFECTIVE WELLNESS PROGRAM SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING KEY COMPONENTS. B. Collection ion of Baseline DAta on Participants and Control Group - Use of sick days - Use of Health Care Insurance - Incidence of tardiness - Productivity C. A Needp to determine the level and type of interest /needs of prospective participants. D. A com plete Health Riak Appraisal (HRA) Any number of tools can be used. The best types include height, weight, blood pressure, participant and family health history, blood cholesterol level and environmental and habitual risk factors. This HRA serves as a baseline to measure effectiveness of participants' lifestyle changes and the program itself. Each participant must be assured confidentiality of the Health Risk Appraisal information. Individual Consultation with a health professional to review HRA results and provide insight into necessary lifestyle changes to achieve wsllnesa. F LU Follow un Prnaram to provide participants with effective means /aesietance in lifestyle changes, i.e., quit smoking classes, exercise programs, diet clubs, etc. A continuing effort to promote healthy lifeetylea and committment to the program at the employee's workplace (Wellness Committee). Eya,luationa at 1 year and 2 years (repeat HRA, height, weight, blood presure) to provide participants with feedback concerning lifestyle changes and measure effectiveness of program. Comparison of baseline data with current use statistics at one and two year intervals to assess effectiveness of program. The following program is available for Components A -F. • P-A Wellness Program - City of Hutchinson Page 2 1. A. *Collection of baseline data. This can be completed by City of Hutchinson personnel /computer with the assistance of Robyn Erickson. B. deeds AnAcRamant done by Wellness Committee with assistance of Robyn Erickson. COST C. Health Ri.k Appraisal - "Health TracTH" by $8.00 Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Takes approximately 20 minutes to complete and is mailed to BC /BS. Group reporting at no extra cost. D. Total M ond Chemiat�ry (includes cholesterol level) $25.00 Performed by Hutchinson Community Hospital lab on site. E. 5 Loy2l Blood Cholesterol done by Hutchinson $10.00 Community Hospital lab. Drawn on site. F. FollowIig Individual Cnnsultat. ion and referral $15.00 to appropriate classes - one half hour. Can be done on site or at Hutchinson Community Hospital. TOTAL $58.00 COMPONENT F: FOLLOW UP CL ASSES Hutchinson Community Hospital has qualified personnel to conduct /facilitate follow -up classes on stress, smoking, exercise, diet, weight loss programs, safety and back care. The cost for these classes and materials is proportionate to the number of participants and class sessions. (Also see attached listing of Health Related Classes.) Promotion of the wellness effort can and should be accomplished by a Wellness Committee comprised of City of Hutchinson employees. COMPONENT H: Repeat HRA's and bloodwork should be completed at one year and two Year intervals. COMPONENT I: OVERALL PROGRAM RVALUATTON Baseline data, ill time, use of insurance, etc., should be compared at one year and two year intervals. This subsequent data, again, can be collected by City of Hutchinson personnel or Hutchinson Community Hospital (for a consultation fee). r 1 LJ Wellness Program - City of Hutchinson Page 9 9 The Hutchinson Community Hospital consultant, upon Obtaining data will submit a comparative report, including a Group Health Risk Profile and the impact of the Wellness Program on City of Hutchinson at one year and two year intervals. Respectfully submitted, Robyn d. Eri kaon, RN • Director of Education and Marketing RGE:nla 0 • HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL /BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME HEALTH RELATED CLASSES Provided on a one -to -one basis through our Personal Nutrition Counseling Program. Cost: Weight Control and Three Month Weigh In $86.25 Weight Control only $34.50 Low Cholesterol /Low Salt Diet $34.50 Healthy thy Ra n HAbite Seminars, group sessions on: Eating for a Healthy Heart, Lowering Your Cholesterol, and How to Shop for Healthy Foods. Customized to meet your organization's needs. Instructed by a team of our Dietary Technicians. Cost: $50.00 per hour • Hutchinson Community Hospital's Mental Health Services has a staff of Mental Health Therapists, Psychiatrists and Mental Health Nurses who can tailor programs to meet your needs. Topics include: stress and coping mechanisms, depression, eating disorders, and chemical dependency. These can be offered as one to two hour seminars. Individual referrals and counseling are also available. Cost: Dependent on Topic and Precentor $75.00 - $150.00 per hour gesviratory Care / Quit Smoking Classes Our Registered Respiratory Therapist can offer classes on Asthma, Chronic Lung Problems and is a Freedom From Smoking facilitator. Hutchinson Community Hospital also offers a program "21 Days to Stop Smoking" developed with the American Cancer Society. Cost: Classes $35.00 per hour Freedom From Smoking $45.00 per person 21 Days to Stop Smoking $40.00 per person Qther Health Related Topics Hutchinson Community Hospital's Health Education Resource Center employes four RN Health Educators who can speak on a variety of • topics ranging from Cancer Prevention, Self- Breast Exam, Teaticular Exam, First Aid /CPR, Hypertension and Healthy Lifestyle Habits. Cost: $35.00 per hour David G. Rozzelle General aarlml April 21, 1992 ��021222 G. Barry Anderson, Esq. Arnold & McDowell 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2563 /� Federal Expr Dear Barry: S I am writing in follow -up to our meeting last Friday in Hutchinson in which we discussed the issues of concern to the City and the Cable Advisory Committee. In anticipation of the City Council Meeting of April 28, 1992, 1 would like to state the position of D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. on the issues raised in the meeting. 1. HCVN Eauioment Fee In light of the voluntary nature of the • $0.35 payment to HCVN by the subscribers, D.D. Cable Partners will commit to collecting the fee for the City. As we discussed, this fee will not constitute "gross revenues" for franchise fee purposes. 2. Coordinator Salary and Eauioment Charges D.D. Cable Partners will, of course, continue to pay the $ 12,000 coordinator's salary and up to $2,000 in equipment costs each year. 1 am aware of HCVN's desire to increase these amounts, but as I stated at the meeting, changes in the existing franchise agreement are more properly subjects to be discussed during our renewal negotiations, which should begin shortly. On behalf of D.D. Cable Partners, allow me to assure you that we are prepared to enter into those negotiations as soon as we are through the franchise transfer process. 3. Technical Audit Per our discussion with Mark, I am enclosing a copy of the diligence form we completed for the Hutchinson system last summer when we did our inspection. It appeared to me that a major complaint concerned the quality of the upstream channel used to feed Channel 10 to the headend. As I stated at the meeting, it is the system's responsibility to deliver an acceptable signal to the headend. We will undertake repairs to correct that problem. As for general concerns about the system's technical state, the FC6 new technical • standards require bi- annual proofs of performance which we will share with the City. The new standards are tough. If the system meets them, r , 235 Montgomery, Suite 420 ■ San Francisco, CA 94104 ■ (415) 397 -4121 ■ FAX (415) 397 -3978 G. Barry Anderson, Esq. April 21, 1992 Page 2 it will be in fine shape. I am hopeful sharing the test results will help allay concerns over the system's general technical state. 4. Channel Offerings As you know, we met with the management of the Appleton PBS station at City Hall following the cable meeting. It appears that the station is located about 85 air miles from the cable system headend. That is probably too far to receive an acceptable and reliable signal for cable carriage. Nevertheless, we agreed to work together to resolve the signal strength issue. Further, as I stated at the meeting, the system will add Midwest Sports Channel jf a survey of the subscribers supports the addition of this expensive basic service. As you know, many Minnesota systems increased rates $1.50 to $2.00 per month when MSC was added. While we may be able to absorb some of the expense, it is likely that we too will have to adjust rates if MSC is added. Our subscribers should know that in advance. 5. Service. As we explained at the meeting, as soon as the transaction closes, D.D. Cable Partners will add a senior technician to the area to focus on sweeping (balancing) the systems in the region. The tech will also make certain that the system does not "leak" in the aeronautical bands, which is prohibited by federal rule. The addition of this technician will relieve the local technicians from these chores and will give them more time to respond to trouble calls and focus on system maintenance. As I stated at our meeting, D.D. Cable Partners believes that the relationship between the City and the cable operator must remain satisfactory to both sides in order to work well. Accordingly, we will meet with the City at any time to discuss any issue of concern, up to and including the renewal of the franchise. My staff and I do only one thing -- we operate cable television systems and, as the Moss & Barnett report concludes, we do a good job. We look forward to working with the City and the Cable Advisory Committee to serve the citizens of Hutchinson. I will see you on the 28th. cc: John Brinker Mark Machart Alexandra Becker Gary Nadolsky Cordially, 4 David G. a le Chief Executive Officer, Cable Operations 40 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 5]3]0-2563 (612) 587 -7575 FA3 (612) 58T -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY G BARRY AYDERSO.0 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Transfer of Cable Franchise our File No. 3244 -92054 m COBSSSL WILLIAM W. CAMSION RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL V.BEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL 5881 CEDAR LAE£ ROAD MINNRAPOLIS,MINN'ESOTA 55416 1612) 545 -9000 MS TOLL FREE 500- 343 -4545 FAR(6121545 -1)93 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 389 -2214 FAX (6121 389 -5306 DASTa n. A ti DO O oA=Y a.>knowsv. gI � STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. RABHT ANDEED(IN' STEVEN S. HOGE LIIBA S. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEOOSMANN PAIIL D. DOVE" JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES U 1.ZY HICRARD O. WOEE TIMOTHY W, FAFINSEI MARY E. HORROCES CATHRYN D. REBER April 20, 1992 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 5]3]0-2563 (612) 587 -7575 FA3 (612) 58T -4096 RESIDENT ATTORNEY G BARRY AYDERSO.0 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Transfer of Cable Franchise our File No. 3244 -92054 m COBSSSL WILLIAM W. CAMSION RAYMOND C. LALLIER PAUL V.BEOICH CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL 5881 CEDAR LAE£ ROAD MINNRAPOLIS,MINN'ESOTA 55416 1612) 545 -9000 MS TOLL FREE 500- 343 -4545 FAR(6121545 -1)93 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 389 -2214 FAX (6121 389 -5306 Dear Gary: • This letter is with regard to the approval of the transfer of the franchise for the provision of cable television services presently held by Star Cable Systems. I an enclosing the following which should be included in the next Council packet: 1. A copy of the description of the key individuals of D.D. Cable Partners; 2. A copy of the interview with David G. Rozzelle, which interview was prepared by the law firm of Moss & Barnett. This interview gives some insight into the plans for D.D. Cable Partners. 3. A copy of interviews with Cable System Administrators. 4. The financial qualifications of the proposed franchisee. 5. A Notice of Public Hearing which should be approved by the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION l / �f��( "CERTIFIED AS A BEAL PROPERTY LAB SPECIALIST BY TH£ MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION l '�`/^'✓�)`� r ti gI � Dear Gary: • This letter is with regard to the approval of the transfer of the franchise for the provision of cable television services presently held by Star Cable Systems. I an enclosing the following which should be included in the next Council packet: 1. A copy of the description of the key individuals of D.D. Cable Partners; 2. A copy of the interview with David G. Rozzelle, which interview was prepared by the law firm of Moss & Barnett. This interview gives some insight into the plans for D.D. Cable Partners. 3. A copy of interviews with Cable System Administrators. 4. The financial qualifications of the proposed franchisee. 5. A Notice of Public Hearing which should be approved by the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting. • 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION l / �f��( "CERTIFIED AS A BEAL PROPERTY LAB SPECIALIST BY TH£ MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION l '�`/^'✓�)`� Mr. Gary Plotz April 20, 1992 Page 2 As you know, we met and discussed at some length the status of cable service in the community. Those discussions included representatives of D.D. Cable Partners, Star, the Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc., and yourself. The issues that were discussed included but were not limited to the following: 1. Cable Reception, Don Hansen presented a report dealing with the cable reception difficulties including the problems involving the paging tower for the telephone company. Commitments were made to make sure that the cable reception problems were resolved and in particular, cable reception problems involving Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. I am reporting to you, as well, that immediately following our meeting Star Cablevision employees were in the process of attempting to correct reception problems relating to HCVN, Inc. Commitments were made to sweep the system at least once • a year with a goal of eventually sweeping the system twice a year. A significant capital budget has been set aside for the system as a whole and Hutchinson will see the benefit of the increased capital expenditures. 2. Additional Channels. There was discussion concerning the possibility of additional channels. D.D. Cable Partners indicated that they intended to survey the community with respect to both the Midwest Sports Channel (MSC) and other possible channels. I did introduce represents of D.D. Cable Partners to Ansel Dahl of Appleton Public Television and presumably something will be worked out in that regard. There are probably additional channels that we don't know about that could also be added, assuming the market and expenses warranted it. 3. Public Access Issues. D.D. Cable Partners did make a commitment to continue the 35 cent HCVN fee until the end of the franchise agreement. There was extensive discussion concerning the non performance of the system as it relates to public access and as noted above, D.D. Cable Partners is investigating that issue. 4. Noncompliance Issues. In several respects, Star is not • in compliance with the franchise agreement. Those areas 9 Mr. Gary Plotz April 20, 1992 Page 3 of noncompliance are set out in Section 11 of the report to the City of Hutchinson. D.D. Cable Partners agreed to resolve those areas of noncompliance. r� There are a number of areas of concern that need to be addressed relative to a new franchise agreement, but D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. felt it was not appropriate to bargain on those issues in the process of transferring the franchise. Since the franchise has something less than two years to run, and since negotiations for an extension of the franchise will begin within 90 to 120 days of the completion of the acquisition, I do not believe it is necessary to demand that these issues be resolved at the present time. The biggest, and clearly most significant, concern has to do with technical issues and I believe D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. left with a very good understanding of the depth and extent of those present problems. I would recommend that we schedule the public hearing as soon as possible and move this matter along. At the present time, I am anticipating that I will recommend approval of the transfer of the franchise. Best regards. Very truly yours, G.IwBarry Anderson GBA:lm Enclosures CC HCVN Board of Directors (without enclosures) Sue Potter David Rozzelle Moss & Barnett, Attention: Adrian Herbst Leo J. Hindery, ]r. Da vid G. Rozzelle Leo I. Hindery, Jr.. is the founder. Managing General Partner and Chief Executive Officer of InterMedia. NIr Hindey 44. formed InterMedia in 1988. tcithm 18 months. the Company had acquired ,able television systems serving some 320.;.W subscribers in Arizona. California. Hawaii. Georgia. \crth Carolina. South Carolina and Tennessee By earl 1989. InterMedia Partners had become one of the 30 largest operators tit multiple cable television systems in the Cmted States. leading Cablevision Magazine to describe the young company as - the success story of cable entrepreneurs in 1989. - The initial transactions were fonowed by additional acquisitions in California. South Carolina. Hawaii. Illinois. Iowa. Minnesota and Wisconsin. Before launching InterMedia. Mr. Hindery was Chief Officer for Planning and Finance of The Chronicle Publishing Compam of San Francisco. which serves more than 290.000 cable television customers. operates three television stations and owns 17 newspapers. As the second most senior officer of this privareh held media company. Mr. Hindery was responsible for all acquisitions. finance and development ac uvities, Prior to joining The Chronicle Publishing Compan Mr. Hindery was Chief Financial Officer and Managing Director of Becker Paribas Incorporated and a senior member of all the cam mnment and credit comminees of this major ceu fork -based investment hanking firm. d His career includes more Than l0 years of e"periena at two Fortune 500 .ompames as the senior financial officer. Mr. Hinder % graduated with honors 'ro m the Graduate School of Business of Stanford University. where he earned the degree of Master of Business Administration in 1971. He graduated with honors from Searde University. where he now is a member of the Board of Trustees and recently was honored as Alumnus of the Year. ■ David G. Rozzelle is the General Partner of InterMedia who is the Chief Executive Officer of Cable Operations. Mr. ROZZelle. 45. heads the team of seasoned cable television executives who helped build lnierMedia in less than two years from a start-up enterprise into the nation's 34th largest cable company. He leads the budgeting process. directs franchise relations. supervises system operations. administers personnel policies and evaluates potential acquisittons. Prior to pining InterMedia. Mr. Rozzelle was a Partner in the communications law firm of Fletcher. Heald S Hildreth in Washington. D.C.. which is the oldest such firm in the United States..mr. Rozzelle. who joined the firm in 1973 and became a full Partner in 1978, spent much of his time administering the 60- person office. Throughout his career..Mf. Rozzelle represented many prominent companies in the United States, particularly in the cable industry. He was actively involved in many of the key management decisions of his clients, including acquisitions. financings. day -to-day operating issues. regulatory matters. personnel decisions. technkal matters and programming questions. Mr. Rozzelle served for more than 10 Years as senior communications counsel to %tstern Communications. Inc.. the cable television division of The Chronicle Publishing Company. In 1986, he also served as Chief Operating Officer of one of Western's subsidiaries. A graduate of die University of MarYland. Mt. Rozzelle obtained his law egret from the National Law Center of George Washington University. ■ Edward G. L Iebst, Jr. Edward G_ Liebst. If a General Partner of InterMedia and its Chief financial Officer. .Mr Liebst. 41. oversees the financial performance of all InterMedia assets . as well as the anal} sis and financing of Potential acquisitions, He brings to his position I I ,years of developing and financing cable television transactions as an investment banker and a lender to media companies. PnOr ro pining InterMedia as a founding Partner in 1968. Mr. Liebst was a Vice President in the investment banking unit of the Bank of Amenca and BankAmerica Capital Corporation. In his four years with the bank. as wen as in Previous positions, he became familiar with many of the nation's leading muluple able system operators. their finance SUMS and the able properties themsei es. Hr. Liebst began his career in media finance in 1976 with Baker Paribas Incorporated, where he was associated with Baker Communications Assocurcs. a cable investmenr partnership orgy nuto by the firm. As an officer of Baker a Partner in this loan and investment fund. his responsiblities included industry and transaction analysis, portfolio administration and investment execution. Mr. Liebst obtained a Bachelor of .Arts degree with honors from Sr Norben College and eamed a .Master of Business Administration degree from DePaul Universin• in Chicago. ■ -9- IF -10- �_P• On March 20, 1992, we met with David G. Rozzelle, a general partner of InterMedia Capital Manaqement II, L.P., to discuss D D Cable's plans and intentions with respect to the cable television systems subject to the Stock Purchase Agreement. The following summarizes these discussions, in a question and answer format: Adrian E. Herbst: What changes do you plan to make locally as a result of this acquisition? David G. Rozzelle: One of the first things we are doing is to create a regional office, or a regional headquarters, in the Prior Lake /Savage area. This office will also be a local office from the standpoint that local services can be accommodated at the office. It is important for you to know that the regional office will include, here in Minnesota on a regional basis, a division of the corporate headquarters. John Brinker, formerly with United Artists, will fill the newly- created position of Regional Engineer. Four new senior technicians will be ' hired. AEH: What about existing Star personnel and individuals that are now operating locally to provide service in communities? Are you planning to eliminate jobs or change personnel? DGR: There will be changes; however, we are sensitive to the needs of communities to have stability in the local i operations. Many Star individuals will remain and will be employed by our company. J t AEH: Will the sale of the Star Cable systems to your company cause rates to increase? DGR: I can tell you that our purchase of the cable systems will not cause pressure on rates. The acquisition has been carefully designed to keep pressure off rate increases. Of course, rates may increase over the next several years. However, those rate increases would be related to our costs of doing business and providing the services and not because of a leveraged buyout. -10- �_P• AEH: Do you intend to increase tiering of programming? AEH: Do you follow any particular set or code of consumer protection standards? For example, have you incorporated into your day -to -day operations in various communities enforcement of the NCTA Customer Service Standards, or have you developed your own separate written customer service standards? DGR: We do not have a written set of our cable services. However, incorporate into our activities we have been a leader in communities, where we have rece for having done so. standards applicable to we are endeavoring to the NCTA standards, and the country in many ived NCTA certification AEH: Do you have separate customer service agreements or contracts? • -11- DGR: In many cases, it's a question of creating programming tiers h+here none now exist. we do intend to create tiering, because we believe services should be provided for every budget. However, this will involve rechannelling, so it won't happen right away. r AEH: Will the transfer create so much debt to the cable system that the cable operator will not have flexibility in the future to meet new technology? DGR: Our company is committed to improving the quality of its € cable systems. For example, in a Tennessee system, you would see that we have been involved in an upgrade of = the cable system. It is to our advantage to have the latest state -of- the -art cable system and we are committed to do so. Further, the reserves that we have i made in our finances will enable us to have the j flexibility necessary to incorporate new technology gy when it is appropriate to do so. This purchase will not affect our ability to improve or to upgrade the cable systems as they are needed in the various communities. However, major improvements will be tied to renewals, in many cases. AEH: Will the manner in which you bill customers differ from • that of Star Cable? In other words, do you break out charges differently than what Star has done in the past? DGR: We will be using a similar billing format to that of Star Cable. The billing format we use is out of a central billing service. Customers will not notice any change in billings as a result of our acquisition of the cable system. AEH: Do you follow any particular set or code of consumer protection standards? For example, have you incorporated into your day -to -day operations in various communities enforcement of the NCTA Customer Service Standards, or have you developed your own separate written customer service standards? DGR: We do not have a written set of our cable services. However, incorporate into our activities we have been a leader in communities, where we have rece for having done so. standards applicable to we are endeavoring to the NCTA standards, and the country in many ived NCTA certification AEH: Do you have separate customer service agreements or contracts? • -11- DGR: No. We do have work orders, but we do not require our customers to enter into a service contract, and we do not have any form of written agreement with our customers. r AEH: Do your use Customer Satisfaction Surveys, either in individual communities or on a national basis? DGR: We regularly use Customer Satisfaction Surveys on a local level. Generally, these are done annually. If a Customer Satisfaction Survey dictates the need or interest in a particular new program or service, we will attempt to deal with that on a local basis. we have a "subscriber creed" which states, in effect, that the subscriber is the boss. We also employ a national training director who visits various systems to give customer service refresher courses annually, on such things as courtesy and efficiency. AEH: It's been said that your company has a niche or is in the business of taking over distressed cable companies and then holding them for a short time and selling them. Does this apply to you? DGR: I can tell you that it does not. Certainly we attempt to make good purchase arrangements and, unlike the late 1980's when crazy prices were paid for cable systems, we are in the business of trying to acquire systems on a reasonable basis. However, you can be assured that it is not our company philosophy to turn over cable systems. We are in for the long term. Further, we have assembled a team of knowledgeable and experienced cable people, not merely investors. We are endeavoring to operate cable systems on a long -term basis and to do a good job at it. However, our investors eventually must recover their investments. AEH: What is your attitude about system maintenance? DGR: We do have a very strong commitment to maintenance, and take it very seriously. For example, we have worked on the Federal Communication Commission's technical standards and we have interjected ideas that I think some of our peers in the cable industry might not be totally appreciative of; on the other hand, it is the type of thing that we think will be important to ensure good quality cable systems. One of our chief technicians, David Large, holds many patents. He is well recognized for his technical ability. He sets the tone for our company and we have a very strong corporate philosophy towards maintaining the cable systems to work well and to provide good service. -12- AEH: what is your attitude towards public access? . DGR: we believe public access is an important part of a cable televisi system and, in fact, believe some of the programs that are now being developed are becoming more valuable as cable system services. However, we do not try to promote or to develop it and we do not serve as a catalyst for making access happen. It's our belief that if access is going to work, it is up to an individual municipality and community interest. If a community has a strong preference to have any sort of access program, including public, educational or governmental access services, we will help to develop that and work together with the community to make sure that it is very successful. Because a number of communities in which we have cable systems have developed access programs, and often times access programs are of a nature that could be shared with other areas, we believe it could be very beneficial to have a data bank of information about access programs that are available throughout all of our systems, and make those access programs available between communities on some sort of an exchange basis. • • -13- u Neither D D Cable nor its general partner, InterMedia Partners II, owns, operates or controls any cable communications system at this time. Franchises are currently sought in one hundred forty -five (145) communities in Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa, ranging in size from 60 to 9,062 homes. InterMedia Partners, formed in 1988, has as its general partners Leo J. Hindery, Jr., David G. Rozzelle, and Edward G. Liebst, Jr. These are the same individuals who are general partners of InterMedia Capital Management II, which is the general partner of InterMedia Partners II, D D Cable's general ' partner. We contacted eight (8) communities with cable systems currently operated by InterMedia Partners to ascertain: (1) how the cable operator has worked with the municipalities; (2) if subscribers appear to be satisfied with the service rendered; and (3) the extent of support by InterMedia Partners for public access programming and local programming. -14 r_� I At least one municipal official from each community was contacted and asked the following questions, giving responses as summarized below: i 1. How many years has InterMedia Partners been operating the cable system? InterMedia has operated the systems for periods ranging from approximately nine months to three years. 2. Did InterMedia Partners build the cable system? In no case has InterMedia Partners built the cable system. 3. How old is the existing system? System age ranges from nine years to twenty -seven years. 4. What type of cutbacks or amendments have been made since InterMedia Partners took over? • -14 r_� I Some communities noted no cutbacks and /or amendments. One noted price increases and channel changes. One community noted improvements in customer service and repair work. Another community added' penalties of $1,000 per day for "down time" under the franchise terms. while the cable operator protested this, it was accepted and no penalties have been assessed, to date. 5. Is there a local office for the cable operator? If not, how far away is the office? In the Gainesville CableVision system, serving suburban Atlanta, the local office is located in Gainesville, between 6 and 13 miles from the suburban communities we contacted. In all other cases, InterMedia maintains a local office in the community. 6. How many basic cable channels are there? Basic cable channels ranged from approximately 10 to 30. 7. Does the cable operator support public access programming? Is there public access programming? Most communities report the existence of and support • for public access programming. Two indicated there is no channel capacity on their systems dedicated to public access programming. B. Does InterMedia do any local programming? The majority of the communities stated that InterMedia does no local programming. 9. Do the schools use the system? The majority of the communities indicated no use of the system by schools. 10. Are most subscribers happy? Has the City received many complaints? Responses to this question ranged from positive statements of subscriber satisfaction, to indications of dissatisfaction with programming changes and rate increases. 11. Does the cable operator satisfactorily resolve subscriber complaints? • -15- Most communities believe subscriber complaints are satisfactorily resolved. However, one graded the company "C+ and getting better." i 12. what are the current subscriber rates? Current subscriber rates range from approximately $8.29 for 10 basic channels, to $32.60 for Basic plus HBO. 13. Has InterMedia Partners made any changes in subscriber rates? All communities report rate increases since InterMedia Partners acquired the system. 19. How would you describe the City's relationship with the cable operator? Most report relationships ranging from excellent to pretty good. One stated the company "is aware of its rights," and another that the relationship is "frustrating." 15. What types of problems has the City experienced with InterMedia Partners? Rate increases, programming changes, and difficulty in expanding the system into new subdivisions were described as problems with the cable operator. However, four communities reported problems as none or minimal. 16. what were the franchise fees? Are they paid on time? Franchise fees ranged from 3% to 5% of gross revenues. Fees are paid timely. 17. what is the programming /picture quality? Most communities responded that programming /picture quality was at least good. However, two reported picture quality problems. 18. Would you grant a new franchise to InterMedia Partners? Why or why not? Six of eight communities responded "yes." One believes significant changes are necessary, and one reported a need to negotiate regarding rates. The specific responses for each community follow. -16- Flowery Branch, Georgia • Spoke with Fvelp Swan- City Clerk (404) 967 -6715 Answers to survey questions: 1. November 1, 1989 letter states that Melanie will become new owner. May 30, 1991 letter refers to Intermedia. 2. Already existed. 3. Approximately 10 years. 4. Price changes in April, 1991 and December, 1991 deleted channels and added some - average increases. 5. N/A in Flowery Branch; In Gainesville - 13 miles from City Hall. 6. 11 chs. 7. Yes, yes enjoy very much. 8. Doesn't know. 9. Doesn't know. 10. Yes, no. 11. Speaking for herself, yes. General Manager and ladies in office easy to work with. 12. $16.95 basic cable as of December, 1991. Additional outlets reduced 33% - flat fee $5.00 per month for up to 3 additional outlets. 13. Yes, 1991 effective in '92. 14. Hasn't heard any complaints - congenial relationship. 15. None. 16. 3% Paid on time in February. 17. Very good picture quality. Yes. 18. Yes, unless if charging outlandish fees at time, doesn't know what legal ties City has with cable company. • -17- COM - very good Sunny Senecker, General Manager o utt cable comp in development public relations - helped with p areas. to comment on D. D. Cable - not aware system sold to Unable them. Oakwood, Georgia s�sJs� w • Mr�au ley, city manUar" (404) 534 -2365 Transferred to Melanie - Intermedia Partners II on July 8, 1991 - passed by City Answers to survey questions: 1. Since summer of 1991. 2 A previous operator. 3, 1983. 4. No cutbacks. No amendments. 5. Yes, in Gainesville - 6 miles away. 6. 28 7. Yes, not sure. 8. Some. 9. Doesn't know. 10. ups and downs Basically yes No, very few 11. Yes. 12. Do not have. 13. Yes, during changes or shortly thereafter. 14. Good. 15. Minimal - dug up temporarily. -18- 16. $1,691.35, yes. y 17. Good 18. Yes. Santa Clara, California Carol McCarthy, Deputy City Manager (408) 984 -3105 Spoke with Carol McCarthy (she gave my name to Ron Garratt, Asistant City Manager) COMMENTS FROM CAROL MCCARTHY: On personal level: Negotiated with in -house attorneys on cable T.V. No agreement to complete public access. No station for public access. Annual report brought in for residents. First cable system in area. 30 channel capacity. Old cable wires. In some areas you can go one block over in City and subscribers are with a different cable operator or some with upgraded /new system. Nothing in contract to upgrade system. Does not have proper language to hammer out certain changes. Carol McCarthy is lobbying to upgrade system. One system given to City - open. No services with it. 1996 Franchise up. Responsive to requests. -19- i Use highend channels - grainy. i Public Community Programs Take 29 away - poor quality - put on 34. City channel for fire station channel - sensor Geared for small system. Answers to survey questions: 1. 3 years 2. Existing system for Hearst (newspaper conglomerate). 3• 25 years. 4. Expanded. Receive a lot of abuse from Council to upgrade system. Made improvements with customer service. Repairs. Taken a lot more responsibility in the last 10 -18 months. 5. Yes, across street Keep in touch regularly to go over reports. 6• 29. Basic service. 35. Premium service above 29. •?• Yes, but unable to work with City because of limited channel space. Access so limited. Time limited. 8. No. 9. would like to. 10. Improvement, old infrastructure. Average six a month. 11. C +. Getting better. Slow going. 12. Basic + HBO $32.60 34.95 with 2 premium channels ( ?) 44.55 with 2 premium channels 39.95 with 3 premium channels Surrounding cities higher. t 13. Three changes to rates. Changes are every 10 months since took over. 1 14 • To City. General Manage. I away. A lot of contact. Companyawae rightstl�an mile 15. Covered. i -20- 8 i i 1� 1 !� 1 1: i I i 1 1 �1 } a 9 16. 31 Yea.' �I 17. Not good. i 18. If significdnt changes aren't made, will i owner. Will open 3 90' with another will cost millions to bring system up to to pa some changes. years to make agreements with company, par' Take 1 1/2 COMMNTS FROM RON GARRATT: South Bay fourth Franchise in 25 years. Unique system. Six communities in area. Santa Clara is at bottom of structure. Cannot provide certain services which are provided to other communities. 29 channels. R= Doesn't have community public access channel. Lack of access. Need all 29 for programming. Loosely conformed Franchise. Now City talking with South Bay to put money into building up. City wants revisions to Ordinance regarding customer service. I Evaluated cable company. Went through rigorous progress with new company. Sierra Vista, Arizona City Clerk Purchasing Department (602) 958 -3315 with She handles complaints. (Jenny answered survey questions 10 and 11): 10. No, changed programming 1/92. A lot of complaints regarding channels taken off. Increased rates. Recently received over 100 since change in January. Before January 1, one complaint a week regarding service and cost. -21- Complaints relate to: a. had a lot of CA channels taken off. People complained a lot. CA transplants. b. Mexican station. Receive complaints to take off. C. TBN taken off. Far away from major city. Population 32,900. Doesn't know subscriber count. 11. Negotiating new Franchise with them. 25 year Franchise. Called Purchasing Department - Mike Claussen, Purchasing Agent. Left message. He can answer questions regarding technical details. He referred me to City Manager, Jim witlock. Left message. Spoke with Jim witlock, City Manager. (Four months with City.) Answers to survey questions: 1. Second or third owner of system. At end of 25 year Franchise. 2. No. 3. 9. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 25 None aware of. [lave non - restrictive Franchise. Not in detail. Yes, 1 1/2 miles. 30 Not currently, governmental programming public. Public is not resisting. No. Not at this time. Negotiating in new Franchise $300,000 schools. as opposed to for studio for -22- 10 11. 12. 13. 19. Yes, 100 last 2 to 3 months regarding rates /programming changes. anges. Retired people /military. 35,000 populaeion. Conservative community. Rate increases regularly. 1970's technology. Depends, rate increase occurred within 60 days and channel ch Open ended. Pass onto company (Will check into and call back.) See above. Frustrating. Does not follow -up. 15. No. Say in rates. Desert did extensive surveys with 8,000 customers. 10 -12% response rate. Used survey responses to justify changes to system. 16. 2 %, yes. Agreed to 5% in new Franchise. June 30, Franchise expires. 17. 2 pay - per -view. 2 premium channels bring broadcast channels miles. Channel A: 1 - not used 2 - promote pay service 3 - Mexican channel 9 - home shopping Based on survey. Reflects wishes of customers. Los Angeles consultant says picture quality OK. in from 70 18. Yes, in June. Evaluation done. Yes (will call back with results.) Marion, North Carolina McDowell County Cablevision Earl Daniels, City Manager Referred to Charles Abernathy (704) 652 -7127 -23- Answers to survey questions: 1. Assigned several times last two years. 2. No, extended system. 3. October 5, 1965. 4. Not aware of any. 5. Yes, 1/2 mile. 6. Channels 3 -13 $ 8.29 Channels 3 -32 Full basic channels 20.62 Remote 3.15 HBO 13.08 Show 12.55 Cinemax 11.50 Disney 11.50 Encore 9,9 2 pay channels 18.85 3 pay channels 24.10 7. Have capability, do some local commercials, weather channels. Not aware. 8. No. 9. Not aware of. (County Manager may be able to answer.) 10. Occasional complaint calls from people who cannot obtain service from outlying area. Company unable to help because of budget. 11. Yes. 1 2. January 1, 1992. See N6. 13. See N6. 1 4. Pretty good. 15. See N10 (County area) and rates. 16. Was collecting fees for County and City. Now just City, which McDowell took over. 5 %, goes up based on amount of gross revenues. Maximum 5 %. 17. Some channels can't pick up real well because of electronic interference. Conflict with repeater bleed -in and ghosts. v I� 1 1 I�1 I; 1 -24- i 18. Would have to negotiate regarding rates. i Peachtree City, Georgia Cindy Price, Secretary to Mayor (404) 487 -7657 iP91S w • (She answered survey 9uestions R10 and till call the 10, Averages 10 calls ve mo nth. one through a different ochannels. City because they' 11. Yes. Makes sure they do. Stays on their back until they take care of. (She handles Svoke__w! to Fra M ttPr Citv Clerk• Franchise). ComWNTS FROM FRANCES Things running smoothly. Answers to survey questions: 1. Approximately 2 years. 4 different owners over the years. 2. No. 3. Since 1978 - 1979. 4. Not aware. No control over since change with Cable Act. City put penalties in Franchise t time - $1,000 per Penalties in Franchise regarding d day. Company p rotested, but accepted. Has not assessed City has not used. Threatened company. penalty. 5. Yes, 2 to 5. 6. Doesn't know. 7. No channel dedicated to access programming. City was recently allowed to use pay - per -view channel to air programs. Company reserves right to use. p r o ramming. 6 months company has not interrupted ; however, they City ),as not insisted on channel; for renewal. will negotiate when Franchise is up -25- C 1� 1 y 1 S. No. 9. No. 10. See above. 10 11 See above. 12. $50.00. 2 movie channels and basic. 13. Yes, at least 2 -3 times. 14. Good, City feels shouldn't oversee as much as they are. 15. Cable not buried. Rates. New City. Problem getting cable in new subdivision. 16. 4 %, yes. 17. Fine, better than having regular T.V. 18. Yes. COMMENTS FROM FRANCES Renegotiating Franchise is 1992, up in 1994. Receptive to new cable company coming in to have 2 companies in City to create competition and keep rates down. McKenzie, Tennessee Mayor: Robert Putnam City Clerk: Jane Thompson (901) 352 -2292 Spoke with Robert Putnam Mavo Answers to survey questions: 1 • 2 years. 2. No. 3 • Early 70's. 4 • No, expanded. 5. Yes, 1 mile. 6. 20 approximately. -26- 7. Yes, yes. 8. No. 9, Yes, public service announcements. School boards voted to promote classroom interaction. 10. Yes, 80% or more. No, not at all. At first, received a lot. Routed to cable company. 11. Yes. 12. $17.95, approximately, for basic. 13. Yes. Minimal raise. Once in 3 years. 12 -13% raise. 14. Excellent. 15. None, lived up to promise with rate. 16. 5 %, yes, 1/4' 1 y. 17. Very good. 18. Yes. Greenwood, South Carolina City Manager: Steven Brown (803) 942 -8400 Sooke wi Steven Brown 1. 3 changes in last 4 -5 years. 2 years. 2. No. 3. Approximately 20 years. 4 . No. 5• Yes, 2 - 3 miles. 6. Last year changed. 7 • Some, did have channel, but no longer. Need badly. $• Some, but virtually none. _27- MW L 9. No, used to, no longer. i 10. Elders dissatisfied, feel being charged too much. Fixed income, dissatisfied. Minimum increaese of 50% over 3 -4 years. Get complaints. Receive complaints regarding not being able to expand into new developments. , 11. Most of the time. 12. $13.00." 13. Did not make changes when first took over. Minimum of 5% 1 every year. 14. Good. Deals with person that has been there for 20 years. Been with system since inception. 15. None. 16. 3 %, yes. 17. Excellent. 18. Yes. System has improved over last 10 years. COMtIENTS : Had competition in City. New cable company charges $8.95 for basic. TCI had to reduce basic charge from $14.95 to $8.95. When TCI was sold, competitor sold out to same company. Basic rate went back to $14.95. -28- FlNANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS A. Overview I i As described earlier in this Report, D D Cable is the transferee of Star Cablevision is difficult a complex entity consisting of a general partner, InterMedia Partners II, and a limited partner, Midwest Franchises Corp. F ("Midwest Franchises "), each of which in turn is either owed I� by, or comprised of, numerous other entities. own pro form income statement, D D provided financial statements for InterMedia Midwest Franchises is ultimately owned by General Electric Company ( "GE "). Between Midwest Franchises and GE exist two intermediate entities: According to D D Cable, these are relevant because Midwest Franchise's "parent ", General Electric Capital Corporation ( "GE Capital "), which is a wholly -owned subsidiary of GE Financial Services, Inc. ( "GE Partners II has been designed to perform in a Financial Services "); and GE Financial Services, which owns all of GE Financial Services and in turn is a wholly -owned subsidiary of GE. The composition of InterMedia Partners II is equally complex. InterMedia Partners II has both a general partner, InterMedia Capital Management II, and several limited partners. The limited partners of InterMedia Partners II are identified 1 only as ^various institutional investors." According to a letter of David G. Rozzelle dated March 3, 1992, most of these institutional investors are "national banks 1' or Fortune 500 companies." The general partner of InterMedia Partners II, InterMedia Capital Management II, is itself a limited t partnership. The general partners are identified as Leo Hindery, Jr., Edward Liebst, Jr, and Mr. Rozzelle. The limited partner(s) are not identified. y[ The other documents and financial records provided by D D Cable and which form the basis of the financial analysis herein are: GE Capital's 1990 Form 10 -K; the December 31, 1991 balance sheet of D D Cable's general partner, InterMedia Partners II; the Stock Purchase Agreement; and D D Cable's Agreement of Limited Partnership. With the exception of GE's Form 10 -K, none of the submitted financial statements had been audited. -31- Evaluating the financial wherewithal of D D Cable to perform as because it the transferee of Star Cablevision is difficult sheet. In has provided only a I?r_Q f9rZa consolidated balance lieu of its i# Cable has own pro form income statement, D D provided financial statements for InterMedia Partners I. "InterMedia According to D D Cable, these are relevant because similar Partners II has been designed to perform in a manner." �. The other documents and financial records provided by D D Cable and which form the basis of the financial analysis herein are: GE Capital's 1990 Form 10 -K; the December 31, 1991 balance sheet of D D Cable's general partner, InterMedia Partners II; the Stock Purchase Agreement; and D D Cable's Agreement of Limited Partnership. With the exception of GE's Form 10 -K, none of the submitted financial statements had been audited. -31- B. D D Cable's Pro Forma Concolid ted Balance S h e e t D D Cable's pro forma balance sheet dated April 30, is straightforward. Liabilities have 1992 two components: (1) two loans, $30 million and $96.5 million, from GE Capital and others; and (2) $672,000 of current liabilities. According to D D Cable, the $30 million loan is, in fact, part of a $93.5 million revolving line of credit. The "partners' capital" 6 account of $81 million reflects equity investments of $71 million and $10 million from GE Capital and InterMedia Partners I1, respectively. Finall "investment in cable television systems is simply a asset, figure, derived by adding liabilities and capitalp Y a "plugged" While the median debt -to- equity ratio for the overall cable industry is not known, D D Cable's ratio of 1.57.1 appears to be relatively conservative. By comparison, the debt -to- equity ratio of Tele - Communications, Inc., the largest cable system operator, was almost 17:1 as of December 31, 1990. As a practical matter, the debt -to- equity ratio is significant because it affects an entity's interest burden: the larger the ratio, the more resources must be devoted to p aying umulative t negative cash flow fac forD Ca first several that its 1 its existence will be substantially less than Years of mlion the additional credit available on its revvolvingllloan' Assuming this projection is accurate, D D Cable will have sufficient funds available from operations and /or additional borrowing to repay its debt. 1 1L' • - v I�IFl1im Z1 11 1 =11 11 The only financial document provided in connection with InterMedia Partners 11 is a balance sheet dated December 31, 1990. Tire key items on the balance sheet, accounts payable and syndication costs, reflect the organizational costs associated with launching D D Cable. D D Cable has provided significantly more information on the financial condition and performance of InterMedia Partners II. According to D D Cable, InterMedia Partners I serves as the model for InterMedia Partners II. For 1990, InterMedia Partners I sustained a loss of $126.5 million on revenues of $99,3 million. However, principally because d epreciation and amortization totalled $112.7 million, negative cash flow was only $2.8 million,. D D Cable characterizes the foregoing loss and negative cash flow as "planned, important, and expected" during the partnership's early years. Later, it expects cash flow to become Positive due to revenue growth. -32- To the extent that the performance of InterMedia Partners II follows that of InterMedia Partners II, it will require additional funds to offset initial negative cash flow from operations'. D D Cable has represented that working capital and /or additional borrowing will be sufficient to meet these needs. D. GE Capital Fob f-g GE Capital's equity ($71 million) and credit ($126.5 million) investments in D D Cable collectively represent a tiny piece of GE Capital's total assets. At December 31, 1990, GE Capital's total assets exceeded $70 billion; of this total, only .28 %, or substantially less than 1 %, related to D D Cable. Even if GE Capital were to write off 100% of its loans and equity investment in D D Cable, its total equity of approximately $6.9 billion would scarcely be affected. However, as a limited partner, GE Capital is not liable for D D Cable's debts. By the same token, neither is it obligated to contribute additional capital, except to avoid the harsh tax consequences associated with violating the Treasury Regulations which interpret Internal Revenue Code Section 704(b). Nevertheless, D D Cable believes that GE Capital's investment in the entity is such that, if necessary, it will make additional funds available to protect its initial investment. E. S.Q nClusion Based on our review of the documents made available to its as well as certain representations and projections made by D D Cable, it appears that D D Cable will be financially able to perform its duties as Star Cablevision's transferee. The key representation concerns the credit line available to D D Cable. According to D D Cable, the revolving line of credit available to it, $43.5 million, will be more than adequate to fund any negative cash flow sustained in the first few years of operation. This presumes that D D Cable's projections regarding revenue growth and operating performance, which we have not analyzed, are in fact realistic. The foregoing calculations indicate that D D Cable expects to have sufficient resources to service its debt. To the extent that D D Cable's projections prove to he optimistic, it believes that GE Capital's resources give it additional financial strength. However, as a limited partner, GE Capital has no legal obligation to contribute additional capital. GE Capital may, in fact, be predisposed to invest additional sums to protect its initial investment, but this is not guaranteed. -33- of Minneaota, willIhold I the City Council of the act on the public hearin City from the Proposed transfer of control of StartMidwest,s and Cable present stockholder, Star Cablevision Inc' Partners, L.P, a California Group, to D D consisting of InterMedia Partners imite partnership and Midwest Franchise Cor II, L.P. LP as general P•, as limited partner. Partner, The City Council will consider the legal, technical, financial, and character qualifications of the above - referenced entities to determine whether the proposed transfer of control Will cause an adverse impact on the services provided to cable television subscribers. The Public hearing is scheduled to begin at at the City Hall located at Minnesota. All interested m Questions regarding Parties may attend and city clerk's office this public hearing may be directed heard. (phone p), to the By; City Clerk for the City of Minnesota PLEASE NOTE; This Notice should be published fourteen days before the hearing in circulation City area in the n a newspaper of general (19) . -38- FOBIF On NOTICE OF PUBLIC MARM . 19 of Minneaota, willIhold I the City Council of the act on the public hearin City from the Proposed transfer of control of StartMidwest,s and Cable present stockholder, Star Cablevision Inc' Partners, L.P, a California Group, to D D consisting of InterMedia Partners imite partnership and Midwest Franchise Cor II, L.P. LP as general P•, as limited partner. Partner, The City Council will consider the legal, technical, financial, and character qualifications of the above - referenced entities to determine whether the proposed transfer of control Will cause an adverse impact on the services provided to cable television subscribers. The Public hearing is scheduled to begin at at the City Hall located at Minnesota. All interested m Questions regarding Parties may attend and city clerk's office this public hearing may be directed heard. (phone p), to the By; City Clerk for the City of Minnesota PLEASE NOTE; This Notice should be published fourteen days before the hearing in circulation City area in the n a newspaper of general (19) . -38- FOBIF C M E M O R A N D U M u 2- 350- 0705 -004 Gone Doherty Apt #6D 1035 Texas Av Hutchinson MN 55350 705 Dale St 174.51 cc: Larry Olson 705 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 3- 275- 0435 -236 J Schlumpberger 435 California St #2 Hutchinson MN 55350 435 California St #2 83.16 cc: Wayne Kenning 705 Milwaukee Av Hutchinson MN 55350 • City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 D ATE:ARril 28, 1992 • Mayor City C• I FROM: - 1• Departmen Delinament water sewer • for / - month of A Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts for the month of Apr. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday, May 4th, 1992 at Noon. Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - 2- 035 - 0540 -023 Jay Henninger 540 Seconnd Av SW Hutchinson MN 55350 540 Second Av SW 157.44 cc: Joseph Paffel Rt 1 Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises Fri. 5/1/92 2- 350 - 0302 -072 Chris Doelger 302 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 302 Dale St 128.88 2- 470 - 0867 -092 Elvera Ahlbrecht 867 Harrington St Hutchinson MN 55350 867 Harrington St 121.74 2- 585 -563 -081 Tim Kelly 563 Juul Rd Hutchinson MN 55350 563 Juul Rd 93.18 cc: Bob Rasmussen Rt 1 Box 55C Darwin MN 55324 4W L� 2- 670 - 0400 -019 2- 350 - 0325 -002 John Sandahl Thomas Smith 400 Lynn Rd 325 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 400 Lynn Rd 325 Dale St 111.03 136.02 Promises 5/1/92 Promises 5/6/92 2- 700 - 1585 -001 Chris Johnson 2- 675 - 0544 -031 2- 350 - 0354 -044 Keith Krommenhoek Geraldine Elliot 544 Madson Av 354 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 544 Madson Av 354 Dale St 146.73 157.44 1- 270 - 0715 -073 4W L� 2- 675 - 0574 -063 2- 350 - 0505 -021 Harlan Emans Richard Mattson 574 Madson Av 505 Dale St Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 574 Madson Av 505 Dale St 121.74 189.57 Promises 4/30/92 2- 465- 0626 -081 2- 700 - 1585 -001 Chris Johnson Michelle Healy 626 Harmony Ln 1585 McDonald Dr Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MM 55350 626 Harmony Ln 1585 McDonald Dr 143.16 126.00 Promises 4/30/92 1- 270 - 0715 -073 2- 470 - 0715 -031 Emans /Mueller E Duesterhoeft 574 Madson Av 715 Harrington St Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 715 Brown St 715 Harrington St 15.73 171.72 Promises 4/30/92 4W L� April 22, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M • r TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator SUBJECT: Liquor License There is a concern about whether or not the following two liquor licenses have been in compliance with the city ordinance: 1. The Hangar Bar & Grill; Flyer's Night Club 2. J's Pizza Garten /Sports Bar • The matter is currently being reviewed by the Police Department and City Attorney's office. These items are on the regular City Council meeting agenda of Tuesday, April 28, 1992, City Hall Council Chambers, 7:30 P.M. cc: Steve Picha, J's Pizza Garten /Sports Bar Mark Gaarder, The Hangar Bar & Grill G. Barry Anderson, City Atty. Steve Madson, Police Chief City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on xcyded paper - Police Department I0 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 C M E M 0 • DATE: April 23, 1992 TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official RE: Hangar & Flyer Liquor License [v The attached list represents pending correction items to be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy at the Hangar & Flyer Restaurant. I would appreciate it, if this matter could be resolved prior to issuing the liquor license or the license being issued contingent upon immediate correction. JGM /mms cc: Mark Hensen I C \ J City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks &Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled pnper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 April 22, 1992 THE HANGAR Air Gap Softener - Condensate drain from cooler Cover on floor drain in dining area Remove deadbolt locks at panic hardware doors Activate battery powered panic bars at restroom locations Post occupant load sign by main door Finish wall behind cashier top THE FLYERS Post occupant load sign by main door Post "unlocked" sign by main door Remove deadbolt locks at panic hardware doors Exit signs must be lit at all times, not on switch! Install emergency lights as required Provide parking Gales. for future patio area Patio door and patio by future permit 0 I • 9 -0 . DATE: April 21, 1992 TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator FROM: James G. Marka, Building official RE: Flyers Nightclub /Hangar Restaurant Liquor License M E M o • Prior to issuance of the Flyers Nightclub /Hangar Restaurant liquor license, I suggest we add some continency language limiting parking o property only under Mr. Dolder's ownership. The Forbes business directly east, has e xperienced ongoing parking encroachmen problems since the Flyers opened, and has r equested this matter be addressed and resolved. Along with the Building Department's documented plan review requirements, Mr. Alex Gonzales, bar manager, has agreed to limit entry through the east door, hopefully minimizing Mr. Forbes problem. Also, Mr. Gonzales and Mr. Dolder are requesting a permit to install a sliding glass door in the Flyers east wall for access to a volleyball court. I have approved this permit and will document the parking encroachment limitation. Die '1bI�7 :i cc: Marilyn J. Swanson Mark Hensen G. Barry Anderson City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 � - 64 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Prinled on recycled paper - \k MINNESOTA MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION ROOM 4'00 733 SIB! 5Y ST. ST. PAIR, MN 55101 PWNE 612496 -6168 CERTIFICATION OF AN ON SALE ANO?OR A SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE HUTCHINSON ANASAL INC. dba TIIE HANGAR DAR AND GRILL 1150 IIHy 7 W HUTCHINSON NN 55350 ONSL $3,000.00 ISSUING AUTHORMY (Check only one) ^_ITYOF IIUTCHI NSON COUNTYOF M CLEOD LK' Al NA'A OZ .IDW AflTNE115NIP, CDLORATIONI A :,,,SAL INC. l:f H�1PI WSINESS ADDRESS �IIUTCIIINSON 1 150 HS;Y 7 W X5350 L41NSE TY" ICHEOt ONE OR aOiHI LICENSE PER GO CWNTv '?Da SALE CcZAV FROM 21_. TO 3131/93 1 Mc Laud OAUUE fENSE NUM\ER oNsALEF'C SU'dID. LICENSE AVANNER SUNDAT{EE aJSINESSI a 7 I S 3, 0001yr If Pann e. FW. Scale1M tiryer,u 4aaan o1 Each , II•CQrpaalu Suu me Name Ma Aeavas Er EacH 016ur M.TNEROf F'C-NN1N( ADDRESS Nary. Gaardar RL 1, Box 124 Darwin i.a 55324 (612)275 -31:, FARINEROFCC -':AME AOOREaS Julic Gaardar Rt. 1, Box 124 Darwin MN 55324 PARTNERIOFFIC[RFAME ADDRESS The Ucerlsae must have am of the Idlowng: CHECK ONE ❑ A. Liquor Uabaity Insurance (Dram Shop) — $50,CE0 per peon; $100,000 more then am Derson; $10,C00 property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 fw lon Of means Of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF INSUR. ANCE "TO THIS FORM OA ❑ S. A Surety bond from a surety company With FridTnum coverages as apecifiod above in A. OA ❑ C. A Cerfir.l. hem Ilx State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having a market vahue of $100,000 Dr S 100,000 In cash or rcOuntics. 1 CERTIFY THAT THIS LICENSE WAS APPROVED IN AN OFFICIAL MEETING BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE C;TY ORCOUNTY. Given Under My Hand and the Corporate 13th Fe CIT YrL:UUNTY Seal thi day of 19 9 d rtl. SEAL �.�J.rt [y4 A, A1d, During the past license yew has a sL rrFr Liquor ons been Issued under the Civil Liability Law (DRAM SHOP)? E3 YES C NO N yes, atuch a copy of the 6utnnlons. COh11.ETE THOSE ITEMS THAT APPLY TPAHSACTIONTYFE rNEW 0REMORD[ANCEL OATtSSUSP[NLON h A[9FWAL D TRANSFER IT "PENSION IFI TO DAIS OF AEVDCATW 'CA04CFRAT10F1 ADDRSSSCNANCEFROM TRANSF IN OF OWNERSHIP k" INANE AND ADORESSI IMPORTANT NOTICE_ AL;R -T:. 1 -• ^n;,Erg L1UST IV. -- ACUITACIIT FEDEnAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL S,7A!P T4;S r,, 1 ;%rD O'!TPc DU ?EAJ O= ALCOHOL RREA "'S AND 7;:3A000 FOR INFORMATION CALL 612 IN 14?6 0 9 -e . 11 1 111 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 in "0. S'l,"• 4 111 M11IS1 co, minewavolls i MUNICIPALITY OF ...... FIASUANT TO APPLICATION THEREFORO payment of a fee of ZZ.,.W ... the firing and approval of a bond in the sum of $Z,LXV.,.0tA 0 110" kwestigation and satisfactory evidence of the qualification of the licensee.,, herein named to receive the same and that the place of sale syesflar described Is a proper and legal place therefor, LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO .......... ............................ - ....... ......... ... QA�. .... ......... I ................................................................ . ......... ............. 46 4 en" .............. th*., '.—day of ..... r �a -rj, .... �, 191A, TO SELL INTOXICATING LIQUORS by law AT RETAIL ONLY FOR CONSUMPTION "ON THE PREMISES" describ"'as ............. .... ..... ............................................................... ............ ..... . ................. ......................... .................. . ....................... j- .......... — ....... ............. ......................... ............................................................................................. .. . . ............... ......... I ....................... .. ... . ..................... .. ........ ....... .......... ................... ........... -- .. ............. .......... WWCIPAUTY OF ala YN &17 . in said County and State, at which premises said licensee ... confrolS .. and operafe-S... ....... ...... I ........ ................................................................................. ................... w; subjecf, however, to he laws of the United States, the laws of the State of Minnesota, the regulations and ordinances of sold munla rules and regulations of the LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER, relating to the sale and distribution of intoxicating liquors, hereby W hereof, and subject to revocation according to law for violation thereof. 106fte Is nontransferabl except by consent of the authority Issuing ...... * same. S THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ...... jl%x� yi-`" Y1, ........ .. and the seal thereof this ..... .. The ...... ... .... Co 4AI.C.i- V ......... .... ..... ...... of the ............ of... ;J71!.L. ..... . 0 ......... By ......... ..................... . ......................... ..... A"Or ...... .............................. .............. ............................ .... No. Ilitate of Minnesota, COUNTY OF. ftk, Leod ...................... ..J;....-- .,,.r ISSUE DATE M0kDOIYV) ord, 02/19/92_ PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, BLACKBUFN,NICKELS & SMITH INC. ___ r P. D. BOX 367 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE MINNETONKA. MN 55343 COMPANY A ACCEPTANCE INDEr'NITY INS. COMP. LETTER COMPANY LETTER B INSURED COMPANY C BANGER BAR & GRILL LETTER MARK GAARDER COMPANY G I :.050 WEST HGWY 7. PO BOX 203 LETTER _ COMPANY E IIUTCHINS'ON. MN 55350 7 LETTER THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSU ED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, c NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDO = TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. ' • CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER 17, Cr FIECTIVE -_ c,o : _., - ,. LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS .,,R CC ^L RRE+YCE AGGREGATE LTR _: �Me1 OGn`/1 ,'r_�,rw. GC GENERAL LIABILITY BODIL+ COMPREHENSIVE FORM INdaR- 5 ' $ PREMISES OPERATIONS UNDERGROUND PROPE --Y DAMAGE 5 $ EXPLOSION 6 COLLAPSE HA?ARO I PRODUCTS COMP, ETEC JPERATIONS CONTRACTUk BI A P_ S $ COME .E. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOpS BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE PERSONAL INJURY ! PEPSONAL INJURY $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY yx,. ANY AUTO �"'• pEp ALL OWED AUTOS IPP06' PASS I BT p, ALL OWNED AUTOS OTHER THAN) '._ _` 15 PHI', PASS HIRED AUTOS NON-OWNED AUTOS D AMAGE DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY 'i BI 6 P] EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM BI d P. CCMa •.EJIS $ OTHER 'K. JMBRELLA FOP.:'. I WORKERS' COMPENSATION :EACH ACCIDENT) AND ,�, EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY S 1015EASE- POLICY LIMTI $ (DISEASE EACH EMPLOYEE) OTHER POLICY LIMITS MEET LigLLor Liability LUMN334071 :/26/92 3/31/92 THE MINIMUM REQUIRE - DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS'LOCATIONSNEHICLES /SPECIAL ITEMS ACT. TAVERN III Irsi CITY OF HUTCH I NSON SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TIM PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL YVk1O(f& 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST E MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE hlUl'CHIN_0 MN 55350 LEFT' X} i9t 0( 4FE)E�d�AAd7i7R[PGA7Q1[]COS�701 ALITHOR17FD RFPRFSFNTATIVE 1 /J ..J;....-- .,,.r 0 0 The Hangars Restaurant 1150 W. Hwy. 7 Hutchinson, MN 55350 587 -4887 Cessna $1.79 6reah gnound bee6 burger 794 Stealth 994 $2.19 6nesh gnound bee6 bungen with Ameni.can cheese Spi t6ine 994 • $2.39 6resh gnound bees burger with lettuce, tomato, pickles and mayo 494 Pitcher Soda B -17 Bomber Pitcher Beer $2.69 6nesh gnound bee6 burger with lettuce, tomato, pickles, mayo and American cheese Double Cessna $3.39 Double Stealth $4.19 Double Spit6in.e $4.49 Double B -17 Bomber. $4.99 French Fries 994 Bacon 504 Union Rings $1.29 Mozzar.eU -a Sticks $2.09 Breaded Mushroom6 $1.99 Breaded Cauli6lower $1.99 Bu66alo Wings $3.69 Chicken Drummiea $3.49 21 Piece Shrimp $3.49 Fi.ah Sandwich $3.59 Chicken Sandwich $3.59 Chicken Stnipa $3.59 1 Chips 694 Bevenage6 Mitk 494 Soda 794 Ct.eanly Canadian Sparkting Water 994 Chocolate Matt 994 Stnawbenny Matt 994 Van.itta Matt 994 Glass o6 Been $1.25 Wine Cooler $2.25 Co66ee 494 Pitcher Soda $2.99 Pitcher Beer $4.50 Kids Meats (10 6 undenl Conn Dog $1.99 HambuAgen $1.99 Chicken Stni.ps $2.49 Ate kids meala include 6ries and small beverage. Kids Matt 494 DARK A. CARRIGAN. ESO. ATTOIMEY At LAW CARRIGAN LAW OFFICE Plans: 612-587-5900 227 SOUTH MAIN HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 � 23, 1992 APR 1902. REC SY Hutchinson City Council City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Steven R. Picha d /b /a J's Pizza and.Sports Bar Gentleperson: I am sending you this letter in response to a request for information submitted by Sergant Ron Kirchoff to Mr.Steven Picha and relating to the above matter. With regard to that matter, I understand that Mr. Picha has been • granted a liquor license by the City of Hutchinson by Council action on April 14, 1992. I further understand that sometime apparently subsequent to that April 14, 1992, council action, questions have arisen relating to the continuing role that Mr. Gene Doherty may have in Mr. Picha's proposed restaurant and bar operation. You should be informed that Mr. Gene Doherty is the current owner of the building which constitutes the business premises of that restaurant and bar and several months ago Mr. Picha and Mr. Doherty agreed that Mr. Picha will begin operation of that restaurant and bar if and when Mr. Picha successfully obtains a liquor license from the City of Hutchinson. At the time of that agreement Mr. Picha agreed to lease the business from Mr. Doherty and Mr. Doherty would then turn over the active operation of what is now known as J's Pizza Garten to Mr. Picha. In that regard, Mr. Doherty began winding down the operation of J's Pizza Garten and by corporate resolution dated April 6, 1992, Hutch Pizza, Inc. (referred to above as J's Pizza Garten) that corporation resolved to cease active operations in order to complete the transfer s • ?--D' of the business to Mr. Picha and at that time, since Mr. Picha was a individual with no criminal record it was anticipated that the grant of a liquor license to Mr. Picha was imminent and, in fact, that grant took place by council action on April 19, 1992. J. Given the fact that Mr. Picha conditioned his purchase of what is now known as J's Pizza Garten upon the grant of a liquor license to him, and given the fact that J's was an ongoing operation with continuing liabilities and expenses (since Mr. Picha wanted to purchase an active business rather than a defunct one), fir. Doherty was left in a difficult situation of having to-decide whether to cease active operations fully and finally on April 6, 1992, and then try to sell an inactive business to Mr. Picha or continue to make payments of normal operating expenses until Mr. Picha successfully obtained a liquor license. Since it appeared that that grant of a liquor license was Imminent, Mr. Doherty continued to pay normal operating expenses for obvious reasons. Now Mr. Picha would like to begin operation of the bar and restaurant with the benefit of that liquor license that he has been granted (although for whatever reason City Officials now refuse to accept Mr. Picha's draft of 61250 for that liquor license which has already been granted) and Mr. Doherty would like to be able to sell his business to Mr. Picha. Mr. Picha is attempting to earn a living and I believe that unless • there is some compelling concern relating to Mr. Picha continued denial of that liquor license is wrongful and damages Mr. Picha and Mr. Doherty. Recently Mr. Picha and I had an opportunity to speak with Sergant Kirchoff about this matter and Mr. Kirchoff indicated that there was some concern that Mr. Doherty continued to receive money from the operation. While It is true that Mr. Doherty has continued to draw receipts from the business, that has been necessary to allow Mr. Doherty to use those funds to pay expenses which continue to accrue until this liquor license problem can be addressed. In addition, and while certain individuals have questioned the propriety of this conduct, I frankly cannot understand how Mr. Doherty could continue to maintain an active operation without paying normal operating expenses as they accrue. Moreover, even though Mr. Doherty projected a termination of active operation of Hutch Pizza, Inc., on or about April 6, 1992, when that day came and passed and Mr. Doherty consulted me about the payment of normal operating expenses, despite the corporate resolution ceasing operations on April 6, 1992, • 0 • I advised Mr. Doherty that I thought it would be prudent, moral, just and plain old common sense to make payment of his debts as they cane due pending the outoome of Mr. Picha's liquor license application. Mr. Picha and Mr. Doherty both appreciate the city coucil's concern relating to the grant of a liquor license to anyone and they recognized that as a proper governmental function, however, both Mr. Doherty and Mr. Picha believe that the grant of -a liquor license absent compelling reasons for its denial, should be made in order to allow Mr. Doherty to sell his business and in order to allow Mr. Picha to make a living. I personally believe that the city acted appropriately when it granted a liquor license to Mr. Picha and it acted improperly when city officials refused to accept Mr. Picha's $250 as payment for that license without any legal Justification. benefit of a liquor license since the council has continuing Jurisdiction over this matter and since any future compelling problems can be addressed by a revocation of that license. I urge you to allow Mr. Picha to operate that business with the Mr. Doherty would like to sell his business and Mr. Picha would like to earn a living. Will the council finally take steps to put allowing Mr. Picha to obtain that license problems and damages relating to delays in license can also be put to rest? Sincerely, Mark A. Carrigan MAC /kJh this matter to rest by and so that continuing the issuance of that • 0 • C April 21, 1992 Mr. Steve Picha 1035 Texas Avenue Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Picha: The list below outlines the items to be corrected at J's Pizza, 16 Main Street N., Hutchinson, MN within the specified time frame. 1) General clean up - immediate 2) Airgap ice cooler in basement - immediate 3) Install backflow preventers on pop and beer cabonators - immediate 4) Cap water well in basement - October 1, 1992 5) Protect and secure all electrical panels, ,junction boxes and receptacles - May 1, 1992 6) Install exit lights and verify operation of emergency lights - May 1, 1992 7) Install closures on bathroom doors - May 1, 1992 8) Vent kitchen plumbing fixtures - May 1, 1992 9) Compliance as per direction of Mr. Sheldon Christensen, MN Dept. of Health - immediate 10) Compliance with Hutchinson liquor license conditions - immediate 11) General cleanup of basement - six months Your cooperation of temporary closing and cleanup is very much appreciated. Best regards, CITY OF HUTCHINSON es G. Marka JGM /mms cc: Steve Madson, Chief of Police +Gary Plotz, City Administrator G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney Sheldon Christenson, MN Dept of Health City Hall Parks fr Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Pnnfed on recpded paper- intoxicating un -sale lasses. uu APPLICATION FOR ON -BALE IMTORICATINC LIQUOR LICENSE • V V This form was prepared by the City of Hutchinson and the Minomota Bureau of CriMinal Apprehension, Department of Publio safety, puraeent to Minnesota Statutes, 1976, section 340.13, for purposes of bads- . 1 ground investigation. It doss not supercede any Iwo, rules or regulations of the Division of Liquor Control regarding the issuance of liquor licenses. Failure to provide information requested my result in denial of the applioaticn. I. S -TS Lane MAAe,A IG. 1993 Trade N Date of Application z. Ap(L L IS } 'C' Licensing Period 3. Type of Application f�, ® New Renewal r-1 Transfer . 4. SAe.uE 1J �. YZ.c 1 A _547 -0 Name of Applicant Phone 5 . 1035 - Ve)A $ Ave Home Address 6. Citizenship, aMept".) 7 . _L oi.s. '7-4 -so Place f Birth Date of Birth Address of Business Location 9• NCB\ 0ucll:ea��`fa 1_ t, CoT4 U��ock �O TDw+ OF 11 J7C��yfgl UnrT N Legal Desorip[LOn /�+ 10. List owners of building or precise to be licensed, G �QAJf - L1n 4rnT `/ 11. List all partners, officers or directors, if corporation, Name Address Date of Birth 13. Prior experience in this type of business, 5,, H n ,nr.� r n F LLQ,,a[ 2.1 £waT ReTl..l_�h/u. �:na. 2V 13. Present ownership in any other liquor establishnent, 14. Present ownership in any other restaurant or food business, 15. Three Business References Y FiecEn 1L - LO.t9 ?64E If -scAL' '166- 6006 q0 Li Vgllr. 'go Of 9, LL Aam 1 -B0D- 261 -960U M APZ 4'6 r�u.w g: uc a la.nl.`.Jc K 2 orm) ^ Sal -7SO3 16. 1 0. r- O. 7 Corporate or Partnership Title • 9-'�>I r }'- 17. �` 1Je_ N A2A1 Corporate or Partnership Address 1S. If this is ■ transfer application give nmo address, of persons, partnership or corporation holding license for the Peet year. 19. Who owns the bar /tavern fixturea7 42, ZA) A- AA 20. Are you a Minnesota resident? ®' Yes 0 No 7-450 Ni From To If not, where resident? Dates of Residency 21. Residential Address during past Five (5) Yeara, j Z acx'7bq U..D,or Q MAI 3, - IU3- 161 °0 Lx is P NNE 3. I6 A)e Na b I �i _O-S HAI r7D.S pp ID h, -n ilr 22. Three Personal References, A I)DDra T. V_h'zlCAk i19I -1131 ha 7 L--'ono ( 1pu , L Db�em'r�4 23. Employment for the Past Five Yaws, F Doe WAV ?h.n� 10,I ar Sa t9 +� 51. N.W1 ke.� Baz Ua.) Nu. 1 • 1 ,_ 12 A G' A aTr AI / / 2 Vat 1, ii_ lA.._N cT J 24. Any Convictions Other Than Minor Traffic, 25. This application must be accompanied by detailed statement of net worth and last year's tax return and statement of method of payment for business, fixtures and inventory. 26. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of.intoxicating liquor, rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Cosssissioner, and all ordinances of the municipality, and I hereby certify that I have read the fore- going questions and that the ""era to said questions are true of cry own knowledge. I further understand that an investigation fee not to exceed $500.00 shall be charged an applicant by the city or county if the investigation is conducted within the state, or the cost not to exceed $10,000.00 if the investigation is required outside the state. I further understand the ordinances of the City of Hutchinson regarding the operation of on -sale liquor licenses and agree to mabidby h em. 5 gnature of Applicant Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19_ (Notary Public) My Commission Expires: 04/10/02 15:30 01 002 067 4433 GJ SULLIVAN OF A qbUO2 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE THE SPECIAL RESTAURANT PACXAGE CERTIFICATE AS TO EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE LIQUOR LIABILITY THIS IS NOT AN INSURANCE POLICY. THIS IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE, IT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY AMEND, EXTEND, OR ALTER THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY THE POLICY. LOSS, IF ANY, TO BE ADJUSTED ONLY WITH THE INSURED NAMED HERE IN AND PAYABLE TO THE INSURED AND THE INTERESTED PARTY NAMED BELOW, AS THEIR INTEREST MAY APPEAR. POLICY INFORMATION POLICY NO.60123 -84 -00 STEVEN.R. PICHA EFFECTIVE FROM: 04/30/92 DBA: J'S PIZZA-AND SPORTS BAR TO: 04/30/93 16 MAIN ST. N. HUTCHINSON MN 55350 LIMIT OF INSURANCE OR LIMIT OF LIABILITY B U S I N E S S L I A B I L I T Y LIABILITY $ 300,000 LIQUOR LAW LIABILITY $ 300,000 CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO: CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON MN 55350 UPON CANCELLATION OR TERMINATION OF THIS POLICY FOR ANY CAUSE, ADVANCE NOTICE IN WRITING WILL BE SENT 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. THIS CERTIFICATE SUPERCEDES ANY PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CERTIFICTATE. 0 P' 0 MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF HUTCH PIZZA, INC. lil Held on the sixth day of January, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. to accept the resignations of Gene Doherty and Barbara Doherty. On motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was unanimously adopted: Resolved that the resignation of Gene Doherty and Barbara Doherty be accepted. On motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was unanimously • adopted: Resolved that Steve Picha shall be made a member of the Board and elected to the position of President of Hutch Pizza, Inc. On motion duly made and carried, the meeting was adjourned. Secretary • 9 �. AFFIDAVIT OF GENE L. DOHERTY Affiant, Gene L. Doherty, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 1. That Affiant prepares this Affidavit in connection withThis application to the City of Hutchinson for a liquor license. 2. That, in that regard, Affiant states that neither he nor his wife, Barbara Doherty, own any stock nor have any involvement with Hutchinson Pizza, Inc.. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. Dated: March 19, 1992 C¢e.. 0 , L& Gene L. Doherty - fiant Subscribed and sworn before me this 19th day of March, 1992. "U1 , U,1' Notary P b1c J (W T1 1iTYl1 .IAME NEitEPoCK � 000NTY oowruox w� 6yam 1W ri 9 --�). MINUTES OF HUTCH PIZZA, INC. 16 North Main Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 On the 3rd day of April, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. at 16 North Main, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350, a special meeting of the Board of Directors of Hutch Pizza, Inc. was held at which time the Officers of the Corporation, Barbara Doherty, Gene Doherty, and Warren Marmorine met for the purpose of adopting a resolution relating to the termination of active operations of the Corporation. Gene Doherty moved that the Corporation Hutch Pizza, Inc. cease all active operations as of April 6, 1992, and this Motion was duly considered and unanimously approved by Barbara Doherty, Gene Doherty and Warren Marmorine. Dated: April 3, 1992 Gene Doherty - P ident Hutch Pizza, I Subscribed and sworn before me • this 3rd day of April 1992. QUmpa r � • 9 -D� Apri': 22, 1992 C MEMO TO: MAY & CITY COUNCIL FR OM: KEN MERRILL, FINANC D IRECTO R__ - SUBJEC 1992 ADJUSTMENTS GENERAL FUND BUDGET We understand the governor will be signing the 1992 tax bill which adjusts for the State's shortfall of 1992. As you recall the original message the city received was proposing a reduction in LGA (local government aids) of $321,000. The bill passed by the legislature has changed the method of balancing the budget. LGA will not be cut, but rather cities will • now have to pay sale tax. The 6 1/2% adjustment of expenses will be implemented and affect all funds. We are not sure of the date of implementation either June 1, 1992 or July 1, 1992 is anticipated. We had earlier estimated the sales tax cost to the General Fund to be about 36,000 based upon 1991 numbers for the entire year. Depending on capital expenditures the number is therefore estimated at $18,000. We have discussed, at a special City Council Workshop, a list of proposed cuts (which are attached) as possible reductions to balance the budget. The City Council also had earlier approved several actions at the March 10, 1992 meeting (see attached memo). With action of the State now almost a sure thing, we would propose the following action: 1. Reductions as proposed by City Directors would be set aside. 2. All actions of the March 10 meeting would be rescinded * Budgeted Capital expenditures would be released * Additional personnel budget would be released * Expenditures as authorized by the budget would be released. * Merit and longevity pay would be reinstated and • retroactive to employee anniversary date. City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on wcyded paper - Page 2 • 3. Cost of Sales tax increases would be authorized first from department budgets, if sufficient dollars are not available dollars would be made available from any additional re,enues ccllected in 1992. If those revenue sources are not sufficient the costs would be authorizec from cont ,ngenc, dollars cf the General Fund. 4. The city council would look at cost of living adjustment at this time. Possibly handing this discussion in the same manner as previous cost of living adjustments by use of the employee committee and acted upon at the next regular city council meeting. We do have two other items of concern in the General Fund for 1992. We are working with the County in regard to the $65,000 budget for reimbursement from McLeod County for police dispatch operations. We have received a retrc workers compensation adjustment for the 1990 -1991 year. Total cost is some $121,000: the General Fund cost is est� mated to be $17,000. Tnis amount was not budgeted. If you need any additional information please give me a call, 1 will at the meeting to Discuss th memo and answer any questions. • • r] L • CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1992 BUDGET CUTS PER CITY DIRECTORS MEMOS RECREATION ADMINISTRATION 190,930 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT (5,700) (5,700) 185,230 RECREATION 185,230 TEMP WAGES (3,000) 182,230 0. T. WAGES (1,000) 181,230 Equipment (500) 180,730 Supplies (1,000) 179,730 (5,500) 179,730 SENIOR CENTER 179,730 Travel (200) 179,530 EQUIPMENT (300) (500) 179,230 CIVIC ARENA 179,230 TEMP WAGES (2,000) (2,000) 177,230 PARK 177,230 TEMP WAGE (10,000) 167,230 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (38,000) 129,230 (48,000) 129,230 RECREATION BULDG 129,230 Capital equip. (500) 128,730 (500) 128,730 AIRPORT 128,730 TEMP WAGE (1 127,730 (1 127,730 TRANSIT 127,730 Dispatch time & 1 bus only (512) (512) 127,218 certain hours $1,280 40% 127,218 ------------ - - - - -- 127,218 (193,782)(193,782) q' E- t March 6, 1992 MEMO TO: MAYOR 8 CITY COUNCIL FROM: GARY PLOTZ CITY ADMINISTRATOR b KEN MERRILL FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1992 BUDGET SHORTFALL As we all are aware the State of Minnesota revenue forecast are showing another major revenue shortfall. The numbers being discussed are over $500,000,000 and discussion of cuts necessary or taxes increased are prevalent. It would appear Hutchinson as well as other cities, schools, counties, and state agencies are headed for cuts again this year. We have read of percentages of over 7 percent of all agencies to make up this revenue shortfall. Our General Fund budget calls for local government aids of $1.032,179 for 1992. A 7 percent cut would equal $72,000. The cut could also apply to HACA and disparity aids for 1992. According to a report received from the State of Minnesota in 1991 we were programmed to receive $1,105,100. A 7 percent reduction of this would equal $77,000. If the cut is applied to HACA and equalization aid the revenue loss would affect our debt service funds. In addition the city budget anticipated $65,000 to be received from McLeod County for dispatch operations. This matter has yet to be resolved. It all adds up to potentially large deficit for 1992. The amount of deficit will be unknown until probably late April, May or possibly June. A situation which would give us a lot of problems if the city would wait 6 months into the budget. We would recommend to the city council the following: 1. Freeze all capital purchases with an exception being given for budgeted computers and SCBA updates. (The computer purchases will help office efficiency and help in time completion of scheduled projects.) We would review with the City Council if capitals purchases involve life and safety needs. City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 3714'ashington Az Nest 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 • • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Printed on mcvcled rarer F t 0 11 • CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1992 BUDGET CUTS PER CITY DIRECTORS MEMOS BUDGET CUTS $ 1992 MAYOR X COUNCIL Roll Back Salary Travel Meeting CITY .ADM. Office Supplies Postage Misc. FINANCE rajoul CAPITAL EQUIPMENT Misc rental etc DOLLARS (6 mos) (1,844) (1,500) (4,500) (7,844) (400) (1,200) (175) (1,775) (17,000) (500) (17,500) Reg Wages o t wages Cleaning Supplies Clothing Travel School & conf Portable Radio FIRE DEPT Equipment Revenue ENGINEER Office Supplies CAPITAL OUTLAY Temp Wages STREET TEMP WAGES Street Maintenance Signs & Stripping MAINTENANCE Contract R & M CEMETERY Capital Equpment CITY HALL Central Garage Repair (64,826) (1,950) (250) (500) (1,500) (3,000) (72,026) (1,975) (750) (2,725) (200) (1,000) (3,000) (4,200) (4,000) (6,000) (2,000) (12,000) (4,000) (4,000) (7,000) (7,000) (1,000) (1,000) 21,000 319,156 317,656 313,156 313,156 312,756 311,556 311,381 311,381 294,381 293,881 293,881 229,055 227,105 226,855 226,355 2 24,855 221,855 2 ^_1,855 221,855 219,880 219,130 2 19, 130 219,130 218,930 217,930 214,930 214,930 214,930 214,930 210,930 204,930 202,930 202,930 202,930 198,930 198,930 198,930 191,930 191,930 191,930 190,930 190,930 947 I 1. License Requirement, This subdivision would require that no person may haul or convey refuse from any premises or businesses in the City, except for the person's own refuse, without a valid license. We may wish to consider whether or not we wish to license each individual vehicle. 2. License Fee. The license fee will be set on an annual basis by the City Council and the term of the license shall run from January 1 through December 31 on an annual basis. i ' CERIIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 'CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPATE BAR ASSOCIATION ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ILTm s. AANOI AT oRNEYs AT LAW a Or OO6ESn io OANT a. WDOITELL 10 PARS PLACE w.C"EMN 3TiVEM A. ANDERSON RAYMOND C. I..I.LIEa O. BARRY ANDEEDON' HuTCHSNSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -0'363 PAM Y. BEOLCB STEVEN S. HOOE (812) 587 -7575 CHARLES ■.CAEMICRAEL" "DL E. rRETLAND DAVID A. BRDEOOEMANN FA (SM) "7 -4096 m6N CEDAR L E ROAD PAM D. DOVE MINNEAPOLIS,MD SOTA 5'"16 (612) 545-9000 JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT RESIDENT ATTORNEY G BABHY AND£ASON MV TOLL FREE 600-343-4535 J AI[85 =LET PAE(6C2)545- V93 EICHAHiI O. MCOEE TIMOTHY W. FA N9El - — 3013013TH rOt1ETH STREET MA1R E. HORROCES _ _PBINCMON, MINNESOTA 55371 (619) 369 -2214 CATHRYN D -REHEB raz 16D1) 569 -5506 April 24, 1992 2P '-90 a L E27 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator r_ 37 Washington Avenue West o P.£OEIV ED Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 IC Re: Licensing of Garbage Haulers c, � 1992 Refuse Contract Issues Our File No. 3188 -92212 Dear Gary: • This correspondence will set out the rough draft of the proposed licensing program. In view of all of the issues, and the opinions involved with the licensing of garbage haulers, I thought it appropriate to prepare this rough draft and then have the final draft approved at our first meeting in May. For that matter, if agreement has been reached on the terms of the licensing ordinance, the first and second readings could both be in May. In my view, the licensing ordinance should include the following provisions: 1. License Requirement, This subdivision would require that no person may haul or convey refuse from any premises or businesses in the City, except for the person's own refuse, without a valid license. We may wish to consider whether or not we wish to license each individual vehicle. 2. License Fee. The license fee will be set on an annual basis by the City Council and the term of the license shall run from January 1 through December 31 on an annual basis. i ' CERIIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 'CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPATE BAR ASSOCIATION 3. ADplications. The application form shall be approved by the City Council and say be changed from time to time by the CODUCil. This subdivision will also include some of the standards to considered by the City council,—OF public need, convenience, good order, ability to perform on the part of the applicant, a commitment to comply with all rules and regulations of the City. 4. Number of Licenses The statute does not restrict the number of licenses the City can issue. I assume the City will license an unlimited number of haulers for commercial purposes and one - hauler for residential purposes. 5. Disposal of Refuse. This subdivision will require the appropriate and safe disposal of refuse, presumably in a landfill. 6. FreauenCV of Collection_ I assume we will specify that commercial collection shall be as often as necessary so as to avoid the creation of. a nuisance. Residential collection will be addressed in the organized collection ordinance adopted on October 1. 7. Insurance. Liability insurance on the vehicles operated by the licensee shall be required in the amount of municipal tort liability as set by Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes. 8. Recycling. The licensee will be required to comply with 0 all recycling requirements set forth by the City of Hutchinson. I am unclear at the present time whether businesses are recycling as well, but a general statement requiring compliance with our recycling provisions should be satisfactory. 9. Prohibitive Materials, Prohibitive materials will include grass clippings, yard waste, hazardous waste and such other material as the Council may by resolution include from time to time. Please give these issues some consideration. If there should be additional terms that should be included in the licensing statute, please contact me. I. Thank you. Best regards. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & MCDOWELL &4z • 'G. Barry Ande GBA:lm C M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 1992 TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator SUBJECT: Advertisement for Bid -- Interim Refuse Service July 1, 1992 - October 1, 1992 Based on recent state legislature changes, the City Attorney has • notified the City they can move forward to advertise for refuse hauling bids for interim service starting July 1, 1992 through October 1, 1992. Accordingly, I have put this on the City Council agenda for the April 28 regular Council meeting at 7:30 P.M. Also, please be aware of the attached April 15 letter from Barry Anderson to Junker's attorney asking Junker again to submit a proposal. At this time, I am D!2t aware of any proposal(s) submitted to date. Please note the May 15 deadline. /mj s cc: James Junker, Junker Sanitation Atty. John Cairns, Briggs & Morgan; Attorney for James Junker G. Barry Anderson, City Atty. City Refuse Contract Committee City Solid waste Management Committee • City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks &Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled taper Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9- G Y DAVID H. ARROLD GARY D. M•DO1I " Rrsvv A. ANDRRRCM 9.3LAHRr A31mawwH 6TEVRN S. RODE 1AVRA E. PREITJIID DAV:D A. RRIIEOOEMAI7N PAUL D. DOVE •• JDS2PR X. PASRMENT JAMEs DTLEY 3ICRA3D O. McOEE CATX%" D. REHER April 15, 1992 ARN OLD & MCDOWELL ATToRNEYs AT Lww asst Cana= Iraq RoaD MnlNY.AMLTe, XnFXZsorA 55410 -1492 (612) 545 -9000 MN You MzE 900- 940 - 4545 PAX (612) 5 5 -1799 APR 1992 RECEIVED BY John Cairns Briggs and Morgan Law Firm 80 South Eighth Street, #2400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 W mmnsa WRI " V. CAU ZO r RAYMOIID C. • ALLM2 • PAUL W.2" C ZARLSS R. CARM ICH►EL" SM SOOTR SODR7H STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55971 (614)969 -2914 PAE (6N1) 969 -5306 IOI PARE PUCE HDTCRINSOR, MINNE60IA 55950 (am) 567 -7575 PAE (6@) 567 -4095 Re: ' Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. v. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 3244 -87005 Dear John: This letter is to advise you that I have heard nothing further since our telephone conversation on Sunday, April 5, 1992 when you • confirmed that our previously scheduled meeting had been scheduled. As you know, the City of Hutchinson has been waiting patiently for a proposal, any proposal, from Mr. Junker since you and I first discussed this matter now almost two months ago. The City Council has asked me to advise you that if they do not hear from Junker by the 15th of May, they will have to assume he has no interest in pursuing any further contract with the city and the city will need to make alternative arrangements. Thank you. Very truly yours, ARNOLD LL 4 G. Barry Anderson GBA /pb cc: Gary D �J oos- izr:)i .� • 'CE2TIPIED As A CIVIL TRIAL S PECIALIST RY THE XTNNZAOTJ STATE EAR ASSOCIATIOX ''CERT "= AS A REAL PROPERTY LM SPECIALIST aY THE MINNESOTA 4TATi EAR A"M" TON DATE: TO: NI:I4JV9A SUBJECT: and City Council 1 23. 1992 Randy De Vries Advertise for b o a combination jet and vacuum truck I request the Hutchinson City Council advertise for bids on either a 1991 or 1992 demo -unit or a new production model combination jet and vacuum truck. • Doug Meier and myself will be working on a specification for this unit. This truck was budgeted for the 1992 year. RD /ds 11 City Hall Parks & Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recVcleApaper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -22 / �Jl V• M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Discussion of Hutchinson Area Transportation Services Facility Report The preliminary report for the feasibility of a combined city /county /state maintenance facility has been completed by WOLD Architects. Larry Hoben of MnDOT and Rick Kjonaas of McLeod County will be at the meeting to discuss the results. The next step in this process would be to determine all site needs, review the possibility of other collocation of agencies, and select a site. I have noted to Larry and Rick that the original interest by the City was due to the need to consolidate our Park and Recreation equipment at a site near or in the Street Garage area. In this respect, I feel that the City owned site between the Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Composting area offers the best potential of serving our needs. Some County Commissioners appear to be supporting a site adjacent to the Fair Grounds. Although this appears to be a very good site for a stand -alone facility serving the County and State, it does not meet the City's goal of consolidating our own facilities. At this point we would like to have the authority to proceed with potential site selection, and begin reviewing site layout, and the financial and operation alternatives. City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - / `/ • • CITY OF HUTCHDMOG • 37 WASIEDETON AVENUE WEST MTfCHMMU, MN 55350 E NGIINffit'S REPORT DATE: April 22, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Letting No. 9, Project No. 92 -14 & 92 -15 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be held on the 12th day of May, 1992. Project No. 92 -14: Golf View Court from 8th Avenue N.W. to North by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and Project No. 92 -15: 4th Avenue N.E. from Bluff Street to High Street by • construction of bituminous surfacing, drain tile and appurtenances. Construction Cost $ 81,400.00 Engineering /Administration $ 11,400.00 Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest $ 6,510.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ------------------------- - - - - -- $ 99,310.00 Assessable Cost $ 70,460.00 Deferred Assessable Cost S 0.00 City Bonded S 28,850.00 City Other Funds $ 0.00 MSA $ 0.00 MNDOT $ 0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ----- -- ----- ------------- - - - - -- $ 99,310.00 JPR /pv r1 U 9 Z. RESOLuTJOg 11D. 9699 RESOLUTION ORDffitDE PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT . LETTDIG NO. 9 PROJECT NO. 92 -14 & 92 -15 WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements: Project No. 92 -14 Golf View Court from Sth Avenue N.W. to the North by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; Project No. 92 -15 4th Avenue N.E. from Bluff Street to High Street by construction of bituminous surfacing, drain tile and appurtenances; WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THIs7tMM, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIW OF HUTCHINSON, F@INESOTA: THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering • for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Mayor City Administrator A 9' k � • RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON LETTING NO. 9 PROJECT NO. 92 -14 & 92 -15 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted April 28th, 1992, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the following improvements: Project No. 92 -14: Golf View Court from 8th Avenue N.W. to North by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain, services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and Project No. 92 -15: 4th Avenue N.W. from Bluff Street to High Street by construction of bituminous surfacing, drain tile and appurtenances, and said report was received by the Council on April 28th, 1992. NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HITPCHINSON, F1101ESOTA. 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in • accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $99,310.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 12th day of May, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Hutchinson at 8100 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9 -/- RESOLUTION NO. 9701 • RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 92 -07 WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of First Avenue N.E. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. on May 22nd, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director of • Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council on June 23rd, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Mayor City Administrator • 9 m, Z 1; I 11 ND 970 1 I II EEC COST TO W ASSESSED AND GROCRIM ' +' 11.' OF ' [' 1:•: 1 AI ASSESS M T BOLL RD. 275A LETT NO �-X - 1 WIEREA,S, cost has been determined for the improvement of Roberts Road from Dale Street to School Road by construction of watermain, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 319,319.90, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $70,030.38, so that the total cost of the improvement will be $388,350.28. M 11.'+'1. 11 I I:•ti1 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $308,438.07, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be S79,912.21. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.2 (+ or -) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of • Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Mayor City Administrator A r RESOLUTION 7 • 970 LETT RESOLUTION FOR HEARDE ON PROPOSED ASSESMW ASSESSMENT BOLL MD. 275A 1 PRD NO 1 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 28th day of April, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Roberts Road from Dale Street to School Road by construction of watermain, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and WHEREAS the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, T}MU21ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, lffHNfSOTA. 1. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of May, 1992, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the • total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid October 1st, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Mayor is City Administrator I� RESOdMr= YD. 9704 RE90LUTIM DECLABIM COST TO BE ASSOM) AND ORDERM !REPARATION OF PROPOSED ASEESSMOP! ASSES BOLL NO. 2758 • L11TrM ND. 1 PROJECT MS. 92-03 & 92-04 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel Street by construction of sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, street improvements and appurtenances; and Project No. 92 -04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts Road by construction of sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $86,149.10, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $18,952.80, so that the total cost of the improvement will be $105,101.90. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUMCM OF THE CITY OF HLMCHI LSON, BAs 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $105,101.90. • 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Honday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6.2 (+ or -) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992. Hayor City Administrator • / RESOLUTION 110. 9705 RESOLUTION FOR HEARDE ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 275E LETTING NO. 1 • PROJECT NOS. 92 -03 & 92-04 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 28th day of April, 1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel Street by construction of sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, street improvements and appurtenances; and Project No. 92 -04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts Road by construction of sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, TfERM?ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCM OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, N 3INESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of Hay, 1992, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at • such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid October 1st, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992. J Mayor City Administrator 9 �- C TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Consideration of Awarding Letting No. 1 /Part B Project No. 92 -03, Priebe Addition Project No. 92 -04, Betker's 2nd Addition The Public Hearing for Part A of the Project (Project 92 -01, Roberts Road) is scheduled for May 12, 1992. Pending receipt of waivers from the developer /owner of each property, and acknowledgement and willingness to proceed by William Mueller & Sons, Inc., the low bidder on the project, we would like to have the ability to begin work on this portion of the project. We recommend awarding Letting No. 1, Part A- Division I (Watermain) and Part B (Priebe and Betker's 2nd Additions) contingent on receipt of the following: .Waiver of hearing from all property owners /developers ►Letter stating willingness to proceed without award of Part A- Division II (Roberts Road construction) from William Mueller & Sons, Inc. ►Resolution Awarding Letting No. 1, Part A- Division I, and Part B in the amount of $108,483.10 City Hall Parks lr Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2 1] 0 M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 1992 C TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Consideration of Approving MnDOT Traffic Control Signal Agreement for Letting No. 5 /Project No. 92 -08 /Main Street (TH 15) Traffic Control and Signal Improvements Attached is a copy of the proposed Agreement (MnDOT # 69321) regarding the above referenced project. This project involves removal of existing traffic control signals and installation of new traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect and signing construction at 1st Avenue North (new), Washington Avenue (replace) and 2nd Avenue South (replace). MnDOT cost sharing policy for traffic signals involves the City • paying for a percentage of the cost based on the number of intersections involved, for example: ► 1st Avenue North has 2 state controlled portions (Main Street North and South) and the City has 2 (1st Avenue NE and 1st Avenue NW) so the cost sharing is 50% each ► Washington Avenue has 3 state controlled portions (TH 15 North and South, and TH 22) and the City has 1 (Washington Avenue West) so the City pays 25% and the state 75% ► 2nd Avenue South has 2 state controlled portions (TH 15 North and South) and the City has 2 (2nd Avenue SE and SW) so each pays 50% Of the estimated City share of $116,600.95, 4 of the 5 intersections are on state -aid routes, therefore the City's State Aid fund can pay for $93,280. We had estimated the City's share at $80,000 so this amount came as somewhat of a shock, however the final cost will be based on the actual bid, which will probably be somewhere in between the two numbers. We recommend approving entering into an agreement with the State as noted in the Agreement. • City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Printed on recycled paper - M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 1992 DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION - Room 317 Office of Traffic Engineering STATE OF MINNESOU Office Memorandum DATE : April 14, 1992 To : Keith Voss • District Traffic Engineer District 8 FROM Sue Schwartz, Lighting Enginee Office of Traffic Engineering PHONE: (612) 296 -6997 SUBJECT Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 69321 With City of Hutchinson S.P. 4304 -40 Attached are three copies of an agreement between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, and the City of Hutchinson covering the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control signals on T.H. 15 (Main St. S.) at C.S.A.H. 7 (2nd Ave. S.W.) - C.S.A.H. 25 (2nd Ave. S.E.), on T.H. 15 (Main St. S.)- T.H.15/T.H.22 (Main St. S.) at T.H. 22 (Washington Ave.) - Washington Ave., and on T.H. 15 /T.H. 22 (Main St. S.) at 1st Ave. N.W.- 1st Ave. N.E. in Hutchinson. Kindly review the agreement, and, if approved, arrange to have it • presented to the proper officials for execution on behalf of the City. They should be advised to sign all copies of the agreement, making sure to affix the corporate seal to all copies thereof and to all copies of the resolution. To expedite matters, the agreement should be returned to you for signature by the District Engineer under "Recommended for Approval ", after which all copies are to be returned to Richard Pientka for further execution on behalf of the Department. A copy of the fully executed agreement will be returned to you for your files, and an executed agreement will be sent to the City of Hutchinson. Attachments: Agreement (3) cc: Dave Trooien G. Kopacek R. W. Pientka I � 9 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 69321 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO • I] Remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue; and Install a new Traffic Control Signal with Street Lights, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast in Hutchinson, McLeod County, Minnesota. S.P. 4304 -40 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE City of Hutchinson $116.600.95 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered 9 -�. THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State ", and the City of Hutchinson, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect and signing on • Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue; and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast; and 69321 • - 2 - 0 WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide one (1) master controller and three (3) new cabinets and control equipment to operate said traffic control signals; and WHEREAS, the City and State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect and signing as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal which shall constitute "Preliminary Engineering ". The State shall also perform the construction • inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads, shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall perform the traffic control signal work provided • 69321 - 3 - for under State Project No. 4304 -40 with the Construction Costs shared as follows: a. Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast). System "A ". Remove the existing traffic control signal and install a new traffic control signal with street lights. Estimated Construction Cost is $78,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. Anticipated State's share is 50 percent. City's share is 50 percent. b. Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - • Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue. System "B ". Remove the existing traffic control signal and install a new traffic control signal with street lights. Estimated Construction Cost is $79,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. Anticipated State's share is 75 percent. City's share is 25 percent. 69321 • - 4 - n U C. Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast. System "C ". Install a new traffic control signal with street lights. Estimated Construction Cost is $80,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. Anticipated State's share is 50 percent. City's share is 50 percent. d. On Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) from County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast) to 1st Avenue • Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast. Install interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is $27,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. Anticipated State's share is 58.33 percent. City's share is 41.67 percent. 4. The State shall install or cause the installation of overhead signing and shall maintain said signing all to no cost to the City. 5. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in writing by the State, the City shall advance to the State an . 69321 - 5 - 0 amount equal to its portion of the project cost. The City's total portion shall consist of the sum of the following: a. The City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State furnished materials costs. b. Six (6) percent of its share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 6. upon completion and final acceptance of the project, the City's final share shall consist of the sum of the following: a. The City's share (as specified in Paragraph • 3) based on the final payment to the Contractor and the actual State furnished materials costs. b. Six (6) percent of its final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. The amount of the funds advanced by the City in excess of the City's final share will be returned to the City without interest and the City agrees to pay to the State that 69321 • - 6 - 0 amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the City. 7. The City shall provide and /or perpetuate an adequate electrical power supply to the service pads or poles, and upon completion of said traffic control signals with street lights installations shall provide and /or continue to provide necessary electrical power for their operation at the cost and expense of the City. B. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; • (2) relamp the traffic control signals and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the traffic control signals, cabinets and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the interconnect and to perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 9. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of the City and any all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any • 69321 - 7 - 0 third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. The State shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of the City. 10. Timing of the traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 11. Upon execution by the City and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement shall supersede and terminate any existing Agreements • that may exist between the parties. 69321 • - 8 - n �J CITY OF HUTCHINSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney 0 (City Seal) By City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: District Engineer Operations Division APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M Mayor Assistant Commissioner Dated DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Assistant Attorney General -State of Minnesota By Dated • 69321 - 9 - 0 BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue; and install a new traffic control signal with street lights, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest - lst Avenue Northeast in accordance with terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 69321, a copy of • which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of McLeod City of Hutchinson I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Hutchinson at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the day of 1992, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (Seal) ty Administrator • C TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Discussion of GIS /GPS Development As noted in the Annual Report for 1992, the City, County, Hutchinson Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone have been discussing development of a GIS (Geographic Information System) data base map and system. I had planned on showing videos of the system capabilities, but due to time limitations had just provided some handouts. This system basically would eventually tie all City data bases (planning, assessing, water billing, finance, design and engineering, building permits, topography, parks, sewer and water inventory, street system inventory, etc.) into one geographic • orientated system. This system could tie into LOGIS, the County data base files, the TIGER (Census Bureau) system, and other compatible systems. The Annual Report noted the following costs: $ 2,500 Preliminary Needs Analysis $ 5,000 Final Needs Analysis S 6,000 Surveying /Field Work by County Surveyor $14,000 Data Base Map Preparation $27,500 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST Clarence Kadrmas has received funding from the Hutchinson Utilities Commission to complete the GIS Data Base Hap now so that his personnel can utilize the system this year. We are in the process of selecting a consultant to do the Preliminary and Final Needs Analysis (see attached letter from Bolton and Menk) . Following that process we plan on selecting a consultant to complete the Data Base Map preparation. The City, County and Hutchinson Telephone, and potentially other agencies, would then need to make a financial arrangement with Hutchinson Utilities to pay for their share of the costs at some point in the future. Rick Kjonaas, who represents the McLeod County GIS Committee, will also be at the meeting to discuss their interest in the system, as • well as the plan to tie the system into the GPS (Global Positioning System). City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on mecgcled paper - M E M O R A N D U M April 22, 1992 BO L.TON 8,L M F:= N K , Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 201 W. Travelers Trail • Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone (612) 890.0509 • FAX (612) 890 -8065 April 15, 1992 Mr. John Rodeberg City Engineer City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. West Hutchinson, NIN 55350 Re: GIS Needs Analysis - Proposal Dear Mr. Rodeberg: We are pleased to offer this proposal for professional consulting services to enable the City of Hutchinson to commence implementation of its' Geographic Information System (GIS). As discussed previously, the initial step in beginning a GIS will be a completion of a Needs Analysis. This will be conducted in two stages, preliminary and final. PRELIMINARY NEEDS ANALYSIS The preliminary stage will begin to determine the extent of the land base data available to you in the city departments of engineering, public works, utilities and assessor, including formats of the data, i.e. machine readable, tabular forms, maps, etc. An over -view will be obtained relating to installed computer hardware, the location of each platform and the compatibility with the GIS (proposed). Interviews will be conducted with department heads to determine the direction each would like to take in solving today's and tomorrow's data needs. (At this preliminary stage of the Needs Analysis, the interview process will be limited in scope and length but will be sufficient to chart the direction of future policy.) A preliminary report on the scope and integrity of existing data and on your future requirements will be developed to establish a direction for the City of Hutchinson to follow in developing a GIS program. Specific data requirements, development procedures and hardware and software recommendations will be detailed in the final Needs Analysis to follow. Preliminary Needs Analysis Fee $2,500.00 • • • I N(=. MANKATO, MN FAIRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE, MN BURNSVILLE, MN AMES, IA An Equal Ccccn -- '. ITC CVC r Mr. John Rodeberg • City of Hutchinson April 15, 1992 Page 2 TTNAL NEEDS ANALYSIS Follow up interviews will be conducted with department personnel to determine specific needs for information, both present and future. Data integrity and connectivity will be determined as they relate to the utilization of the proposed GIS. An inventory of present computer hardware and peripheral equipment will be undertaken to determine its availability to and compatibility with the GIS. A review of data available to the City of Hutchinson but proprietary to other local agencies, (i.e. County surveyor, engineer, auditor, etc.) will be conducted. A determination will be made as to utility and integrity of the data to the GIS and to Global Satellite Positioning (GPS) needs. A Final Needs Analysis report will be prepared detailing our findings relating to the sufficiency of existing data and recommended departmental information goals. A GIS • Development program will be outlined with recommendations as to additional hardware and software, connectivity to existing data bases, base map construction and a management structure within the City to add to and maintain the GIS. The report will deal with both the short and long term aspects of the GIS including projected equipment and personnel costs for the next three to five years. Final Needs Analysis Fee (additional) $4,000.00 Upon completion of the Final Needs Analysis we will then be in a position to more accurately determine the costs associated with base map production (the initial stage of actual GIS data conversion production). Preliminarily however, we have estimated the cost to provide this service to you at approximately $12,000+ and have earmarked an additional $6,500 for GPS and conventional surveying in order to tie the control network together geodetically to insure map accuracy. This control survey phase will be seen to have been crucial when later attempts are made to do spatial analysis, overlays and edge matching. SCHEDULE: We anticipate the preliminary stage of the needs analysis will be completed within 30 working days of notice to proceed. The Final Needs Analysis report will follow within an additional 60 working days. Base map development could begin concurrently with Final • Needs Analysis on a limited basis and assuming it is coordinated closely with us. Mr. John Rodeberg City of Hutchinson April 15, 1992 Page 3 Thank you for your consideration of Bolton & Menk and this proposal. Should you have any questions or wish to proceed, please do not hesitate to contact me. Since Gary R. s, L.S. VP /Metro GIS Division Manager • • 40 (612) 587.5151 ITY Of HUTCHINSON ✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST :MNSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: September 20, 1991 TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official RE: Trebelhorn /Brandt Encroachment and Drainage Issue The attached documents represent the "encroachment and drainage issue" between Mr. Phil Trebelhorn and Mr. Robert Brandt. Mr. Trebelhorn's attorney, Mr. Pete Rasal has requested I forward this information to you prior to issuance of a citation or consideration of such for discussion of possible resolutions. • Please note that the concrete drive along side Mr. Trebelhorn's existing garage was placed without benefit of a building permit. (See attached permit No. 10346.) The approved driveway parking area addition represents a 6' -0" setback on the Building Permit. Mr. Brandt's survey represents approximately a 3' -0" setback with fill enccachment of 3 feet. I believe the Brandts are in the process of selling their home and would appreciate the City of Hutchinson expedite our legal position on this matter. With the documents provided, it is my opinion that the drive is in violation of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance 10.01 (copy attached) which requires a 5' -0" side yard setback for parking spaces. The thirty day limitation represented on Building Inspector, Mark Hensen's letter to Mr. Trebelhorn dated August 13, 1991, has not been complied with. Please begin legal proceedings as necessary to resolve this matter. JGM /mms cc: Pete Rasal Philip Trebelhorn Robert Brandt— �3- rG4fu"64 • Mark Hensen Planning Staff 9- s' (612)587-5151 %CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350 August 13, 1991 Mr. Phil Trebelhorn 725 Church Street Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Trebelhorn: It was brought to our attention that your new concrete pad along your garage does not comply with the required setbacks from property lines. Any hardsurface area must be set back a minimum of 5' -0" and drainage must be maintained on your own property. After receiving a land survey from your neighbor Robert Brandt and a visual investigation by us, it is obvious that the concrete slab is closer than 5' -0" and the grading and underground roof drain the outlet is encroaching onto the neighbor's property. The building permit was issued showing the slab 6' -0" from the line and not extending past the front of the garage. It is every homeowners responsibility to know where the property lines, easements, utilities and such, are located. To correct the issues at hand, the concrete slab must be out back to 5' -0" from the side property line and the grading and roof drain outlets must be changed and relocated to not drain water onto neighboring property. These items must be corrected within 30 days from date of this letter. Enclosed is a copy of the survey from the Brandts and the drawing submitted on the building permit application. Please contact me if you have any questions and thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, CITY OF HUTCHINSON Mark Hensen Building Inspector MH /mms ce:"�James G. Marka, Building Inspector Robert Brandt G. Barry Anderson Mike Glieden 9 A A 9 - s. LOT 5 PETERSON'S SUBDIVISION C� F W Cr. � F — A I N!w concrete 1 MOUSE NO. 725 (garoge) -7.4 mouth edge o(f lacavalion c «�� v 32 • • • 1 V T � 1 V 30 lb 115.00 LINDEN N t 0 . , VC `, C r� M Q� 115.00 3 5 South end of 4 inch pioslic droln file 10 9 STORAGE SHED • • • L7 AVENUE • denotes Iron monument found. 0 denotes Iron monument set. (I Inch by 14 Inch 0 10 20 40 Iron pipe, unless otherwise noted.) SCALE IN FEET CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ROBERT B R A N O T 1 hereby certify that this Survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I as a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the IMS of the State of Minnesota. EVA;Gt-i n.d P.c- Q.G. . Oat• AUGUST 7, 1991 WIIlard Pal I[non, Minnesota Registration No. 9626. � PELLINE N L AND SURV Minnesota. Book P 1 2 2 Page 5 Job No. 9 11 7 5L AND SUR V EYINO ,Nut c hlnson, Minnesota. Book P 1 2 2 Page 5 Job No. 9 11 7 5 9- - SECTION 10: SPECIAL PROVISIONS • 10.01 OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING FACILITIES A. Minims Size Regulations. Each space shall contain a minimum area of not less than three hundred (300) square feet including access drives, a width of not less than eight and one -half (8 112) feet, and a depth of not less than twenty (20) feet. Each space shall be adequately served by access drives. All loading spaces shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of each issue and shall provide adequate space for storage and maneuvering of the vehicles it is designed to serve. The minimum dimensions allowable for a loading space or truck berth shall be twelve (12) feet in width and sixty -five (65) feet in depth. B. Reduction and Use of Parking and Loading Space. Off- street parking facilities existing at the effective date of this Ordinance shall not subsequently be reduced to an amount less than that required under. this Ordinance for a similar new building or use. Off- street parking facilities provided to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance shall not subsequently be reduced below the requirements of this Ordinance, except as provided in section 6.05(C)(3)(c). Such re- quired parking or loading space shall not be used for storage of goods or for storage of vehicles that are inoperable or for sale or rent. C. Computing Requirements. In computing the number of such parking • spaces required, the following rules shall govern: 1. Floor space shall mean the gross floor area of the specific use.. 2. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be construed to be the nearest whole number. 3. Other Uses: For uses not specifically listed in this Ordinance, uses for which a specific number of spaces have not been defined or for joint parking facilities serving two or more different uses, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall determine the number of spaces to be required by utilizing the requirements of the most similar use listed in Sub - section N below. Issuance of building permits for the above situations shall be subject to approval of all site plans. D. Yards. Off- Street parking and loading facilities shall be exempt from the front yard and rear yard regulations for the use district in which the parking is located, except that: 1. In any of the Residence Districts, no parking space shall be located within fifteen (15) feet of any front property line, or within five (5) feet of any side or rear property line, unless enclosed as an accessory use. 2. In an Industrial District, no parking or loading space shall be • located in any front yard; or in any side yard or rear yard that • abuts any of the Classes of Residence Districts, and in no 82 q- s l MIR IN 0 a f +l a C �1 Z . I II}( >< Y L N I N Street Ia•a: L • • R11L ►IRO PERMIT Be. OFFICE USE OMIT ; � PAS[ TM •A PP RS I 1 : /. — 1 I TYPE IF COIS7ROCTIDN: RATE . IX. ARE LOT CORNERS 11 EVIOIRCEI o _ VOR If Not. .AV [Doll have property sere Q'N OCCUPANCY CROUPS by a t eglatored Lied %or or rise l0 I@Seance of permit. 17. INSTALLATION IF NIRUFACTURED EONL: Sir jai N.Mpor: _ A� • REJECTIONS Mali /Model: NA Year 1,4. PLOT PLAN: 1I Oro. a. afro. pa is t l.g north i. the - PAYMENT IF FEES D ISSUANCE Z) Fill In street sue11) ass locatla.l al. AND EXCAVATION PERMITS. FIRE SPNINCLEAS REOUIRE$I TES sO f) Fill 1. the front. fall Are 71de nee setback dl.eas lest from property line to house and 411 .....Lee, str Yct", .411 llsn. al Ora. 1s proposes o. 1 I 1.9 Ore aelblcl 4 bars lost from proposes paldlog to all proper., list, are 1.I6ting Itr.el.res, S) Oro. la e,l,tisp c @rb c.t. E) Store at@, doe Image Chabot be All 1w14 eat@ aslghior, lard. Streit Name: .re w•ee el tww l MIR IN 0 a f +l a C �1 Z . I II}( >< Y L N I N Street Ia•a: L ♦ilia. 11111111111111111111 .1111 H 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 .11111111111• PLDMIIMG PERMIT 19. A%. EXCAVATION PERMIT 16. NJSL PLEASE REAB .z Fit LOVING REFIRE 5101110 APPLICATION: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 MAT[ READ AND EIAMINEI iNIS APPLICATION A.J KNOW 711E SAME If If TRVE AMO CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAYS All 01e11ANCIS GOVERNING INIS TYPE OF WORE DILL BE COMPLIED VETO. VVETMER SPECIFIED MEOEIN 01 NOT. TOE 6RA11194 Of 7111 PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME 10 GIVE Aurmsa17T TO VIOLATE 01 CANCEL ]ME PROVISIONS IF ANY ITNER STATE ON LOCAL LAW AEGVLATING CINSTIUCTl O1 OR TW[ PERFORMANCE IF CONSTRUCTION. • 1 2 I 1 fl'( 1 BWILDIAG DFFICI L AffIICANT ✓1 THIS SPACE FOR OFFICE USE OMIT '7 q •A PP RS I 1 : /. — 1 I TYPE IF COIS7ROCTIDN: RATE OCCUPANCY CROUPS REJECTED: BATE SIZE OF BIRO: S.F. REASON FOR REJECTIONS FIRE ZONES NALINUM OCCUPANCY LOADS (-SUBJECT TO PAYMENT IF FEES D ISSUANCE NUMBER DUELLING MOITSS OF FLONNING AND EXCAVATION PERMITS. FIRE SPNINCLEAS REOUIRE$I TES sO ♦ilia. 11111111111111111111 .1111 H 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 .11111111111• PLDMIIMG PERMIT 19. A%. EXCAVATION PERMIT 16. NJSL PLEASE REAB .z Fit LOVING REFIRE 5101110 APPLICATION: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 MAT[ READ AND EIAMINEI iNIS APPLICATION A.J KNOW 711E SAME If If TRVE AMO CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAYS All 01e11ANCIS GOVERNING INIS TYPE OF WORE DILL BE COMPLIED VETO. VVETMER SPECIFIED MEOEIN 01 NOT. TOE 6RA11194 Of 7111 PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME 10 GIVE Aurmsa17T TO VIOLATE 01 CANCEL ]ME PROVISIONS IF ANY ITNER STATE ON LOCAL LAW AEGVLATING CINSTIUCTl O1 OR TW[ PERFORMANCE IF CONSTRUCTION. • 1 2 I 1 fl'( 1 BWILDIAG DFFICI L AffIICANT ✓1 City 0f 7 IF I a H E H 0 R A N D U H Cl 0 DATE T0: Hutchinson Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, H. Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF 1ST ADDITION TO PETERSON TERRACE SUBMITTED BY REDMAN REAL ESTATE Staff recommend approval noting Lot 3 is a buildable lot, developer should state intentions in writing for Lot 3. April 8, 1992 Recommendation is subject to a subdivision agreement regarding future assessments etc. Also, plat is to show a 12' easement on Lots 1 & 2 to accommodate existing infrastructure. City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 q / x f Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 . Printed on recycled paper - FIRST ADDITION ' TC N s. . \t _ tibi(� I - \BO t / 1 m " /TERRA :E N �'cT ERSG J 5 — Vii 'Ir a Y � e� P 095 CD 1 U N 0 l p J/ 8B 4J 3ep . ,( • /c 3• / b oC) 3 / b r ?4.. s ja a a / r„na9e oM uUltly easemenh ore arovi mus _ 2 0 _ _ _ 11 119 6 het in .,din, unless on,e1wne " ndicarea, a adjoining mr lines. 10 het in *,din end W ,imna sheer lines r 1 I dUrotes ran rmtwrMnt lOand O densities V2 inch by 19 Inch iron PiPe Ht, marked by License No. 9626. The southeasterly N" of PETERSON '$ TERRACE Is assumed to hors a Waring of 530'00'00 "w w / s • KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rodney W. Saar and Rebecca J. Saar, husband and wife, fee owners and First sate Federal Savings and Loan Association, Hutchinson, Minnesota, a United States corporation, mortgagee, of the following described property situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, to Vitt Lot 8, Block 1, PETERSON'S TERRACE, according to the recorded plat thereof. And that Dwayne L. Briese and Dianne S. Briese, husband and wife, fee owners, and First Stets Federal Savings and Loan Association, Hutchinson, Mlnneaota, a United States corporation, mortgagee of the following described proper situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, to Wit: mot_ - , ncTrucnv1c Tva PAU1 . nrrnrdtna to the recorded Plat thereof. C DATE: April 8, 1992 • I TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, M. Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GOLF VIEW SUBDIVISION SUBMITTED BY KEVIN COMPTON Staff recommends the following: - Rear yard setbacks on 42 and 04 are directly opposite of front setback - Parkland dedication is paid - Separate water and sewer services required to each unit. - 5' 0" setback for each driveway required provide drawing - Original P.U.D. has lapsed - 105' is not maintained at building line on lots 2, 3, and 4 - A subdivision agreement is required City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 H E H 0 R A N D U H i N m �m r J II I m � e e --f - I! I v'E. "•Tip `y Ly `S,0'55'00 "E 296.93 156 141 I 6 &:ti -1 8 I ' - ., I li 11 �I 0 I � I —�1 i � 11 1 o I I _ Ul ` p oi �-- -`---- - - - - - - ---- m 176 m CD o LA m ° . VI E W - COURT No•5T.00" w IQ7..56 O O O 0 x DIo W o I o p4 / �\ `I o 11 q : N • .a I� 1 0 e � 1 ,............... i e1 - I 16 6 11 e - 11 8 m 142 T P SOO55'00'E 298.24 1 I I i I I I i I V4 .: ` vJ L..YL.I }1 ; r �.. 4 r•r_. 1 Y:�' ) .+ � 1 1 i ' • , 'ti•.+ 5 ° •� �,� • I + t•sf , ° ` -. f t 'Y 1 f � r �� ` ly v f' " - t, � ^' � � ; 1 .: ti t � '� w�' 1 �J a �. +r �. r � �►' _ z rr. � j ,� X O 00 E, .. 296 93 j 6 F x 25 t.. '-I 9 1 � / I FCD ® r0 ' n m ° V E VIi? C0 R pr M- DRICT rn NO•55:00 "'M IQ73�, Fa Jim p ` �_ > mo , X'/Y ' w � •� f, ,I —_` �'� � � m 4P' o a �- z m I4I`m p 176 _ SO.55 298.24 / m SHGCY _ 14 .7 A { . • 9 -X, e i, fir, Area to be Platted r,.TF AvE NEE N W - ' _ g _ .. ABC LCN _ .. [Ln ° c F � ' N 3c njDC� y 6 •E✓ a e I I� � I cEi cz - J - • �_ Y[- y • J , e ... i= ••° � • °� • avENUE N W _ ••• S/ � S 1 EvENiN 6 el vmT IRD j 2 ° ..a B, FvIJFiM Z.. 4 _ -' ' v ..... e 2 I a ' ' Cmi�ION AD _5- r `1 . I Je • 9 -X, city of E H 0 R A N D U H DATE: TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission April 10, 1992 FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Marka, H. Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SIOUX HILLS NO 2 SUBMITTED BY SKIP QUADE, 2 MILE RADIUS, ACOMA TWP Staff recommendSAas plat is laid out due to the following: This is an urban development in a rural area, the McLeod County Comprehensive plan page 29 states: Let the cities be urban and the townships be rural. Promote cost efficient and attractive urban development in the cities and agricultural(or agriculturally - related) or very low density residential development in the townships. • - It is understood all infrastructure costs would be assessed to property owners including trunk water /sewer lines and lift stations. - Municipal service availability may be financially unfeasible. - The city has concerns of adequate fire protection to a densely populated rural area without fire hydrants. - If development occurs, city staff recommends larger lots with ghost platting for the potential of urban size lots. - The city requires a subdivision agreement to cover all improvement costs related to municipal utility costs if development occurs. Shows no dedicated parks areas. Drainage concerns due to urban development in rural setting. • City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (6I2) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2142 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on recycled paper - f - 23021 Ulm Court Hutchinson, Mn 55350 April 6, 1992 Edwin E. Homan McLeod County Zoning Administrator 830 E 11th Street Glencoe, MN 55336 Gary Plotz i City Administrator City Hall - i - Hutchinson,'MN 55350 i Re: Sioux Hills No 2 Preliminary Plat Dear Sirs This is to inform you that'Skip Quads made an appearance before the Board of Supervisors of Acoma Township at our monthly meeting on Thursday,'April 2, 1992, seeking approval of Sioux Hills No. 2 Preliminary Plat in Section 35, Acoma Township. After much discussion the Board approved the platting of the first 1,000 feet from the high water mark of Campbell lake with the remaining area not being approved due to the fact it is zoned agricultural. Please note 'that in a letter to you dated October 2, 1991, it stated that the Board :of Supervisors came to the same decision in regard to the sketch plan. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Virgil Goetz, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. Yours truly ,\ 1 • t s C l I� c io d a LYNN 1p O ]I 5 ACOMA TOWNSHP 117 NORTH _ CODE-I RANGE 30 WEST MEEKER Do' SMALL TRACT OWNERS K K Ka. K _` � 7. C • LT.. er. Y.I�. V w � • � • ( µ� � �.~ a ll L ulu •.h r... • vr.YU� .l lti+ � rs i ACOMA TOWNSHP 117 NORTH _ CODE-I RANGE 30 WEST MEEKER Do' Lp l� .. ms F d ii' NARY SIOUX HILLS NO. 2 PRELIh11 PLAT M 4 ` i ••� l,� - : 7 OWNER HOWARD (SNIP) OVADf 19928 SIOa1111111 Road Nulchlnlan, Min"010 '�,� y °`� '-. Ir r•y��` f l , =K.4 1 __ r? '•; ., .r � i. ,��r i �t �_l�! % 1111 ; �,p,) a l% '"� ,�. - 'w i -�•[ ' '�IC �.'1'� 14 1 MTY W. •.1. `�• lili n r, �/ r I % ��. ,� / ', '�, / ii .� I ' 9 61X1 n� ,..- ` t \ BOG . ' �y •' � J l r I, f� 1 � " / �% � / I : . � /` • 1 � �\ � —•Z'c V \ r � � � � ll� Al I � i � l 1' 49 I ` i •-� J :'. ,r 1. - r 1 / - •] :I; ,«. I i �., L,,) X1 1'', 3 1� ♦' -- lI � � =_` —! it I . I � _ � I I r ;_� o .,0 9/ `4..25 �� ' 2. I'1 1 �� \; \ .'° ff ! 1\ / ('fit . J3�'/ it I J 1 �` I \ I �� /,\ �-+L _�• -• \ r /.�� - G _ ' I A . � (< r �� f � �t � . i � ,9m i ✓ l \ 1 1 I � % /.' 2 - r � :''� � Y - � � \ , � ' `-'-\ + 1 .,, � 1 - ci' 8 �\ +' 1 a t li I iT\, .l -+, �, r� i1 \ \ R. `� ,.. t t t i } fli'3 s} �L fr^ . nl f ��F` � \ \ / a. � _C I ' / /� 4 r ), ♦ \\(', 2 4 4 1 cl 1.. T 1 I ,n' ,, \11 n• V 1'%%/ .1. -.t 28 ' I I S : 7 A ' 1 ` ;. 1 \ } \� / ,°" II it Icsm•. l II' q , Y'. X �� D i • • % 1 1 \ �1 i`�i /' 8. 1 �\ `� 14t 1 L_ - r .l L d >~ !� .. •: .� j II I llf ,. t Ya II 12 \II, tii1 /' h •z I I V '� \„ •! I %: J I I I :f• a f ^ FI�:L. II 47 I 141 I.L '- L... e7 _ 1 • 1 '' , , /all II J ; \ I % � 1 a_ —�lr -` y .,1d,r In I _ q IT 1 E s { � T , 1J RJ:- 11 Pt � )n�a�.. 1 , 1: �{ � i. 1 I 1 (I.� J • _ ' r _..X ' �• l ' �f'"'t. ♦ 1 d4��+� � I� =- ar � w i J '� `� r..wn..r I `� 1 I �:r•t _r ,fA'y+4'1 a L, ;. • �-� T T ..,.., .. .�..n. ., Y , e t c - ',.� ?A I: � ;v :i M E H O R A N D U H DATE April 10, 1992 T0, Hutchinson Planning Commission FROMi Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, H. Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson SUBJECTS CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT, ACOHA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS Staff recommends approval subject to township approval. 11 City Hall - Parks G Recreation 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 9 -/&:Qr I� IF." !1 Tt• SMALL TRACT OWNERS i K �I Pv. •L•I K �I Av. Yl1 i Yfl �.I <•1 S ![I M. 1 • u 1 fu •�. . u u f y..r�l� I 1 •u.Y� •� li • • • •�r.4�� N 1 V. u� IJ li 1 1 i Vo ws L� X 1 y. ... f �V. ` v.,. IJ • I .T I pvw•..� I ti� � _. !J. • .� ?.. t+� I�a(�_ X is I •i.w .�� J • • I I w� •�Y�.r fr(•.. rw Y.. a .s 1 •r •� •COL .l IJ • 1 � u u •."�� u X : •�..... a • .�..:�.`.� is 9 -12a -, ACOMA TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST RR[k[R W. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY fo* DR. DAN HUEBERT NYJ corner of NE 1/4 ; 'Cost iron monument Cj M „ O lO MD M z v z 3 0 North line or NE I/4 of Sec. 26, T 117 N., R. 30 W. , NE car. of NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 Wesi, assumed bearing 322.1 T — - 31 24� - OWN2"IR.. ROAD--- -Je- -t - -- 8 T' tk DI. _ - - -- -- - _ -� 3 NE cor ner of Section 26 Cost iron monument ARCEL B ` On �- 88 ACRES ro? N W 0 z PAR EL A ° 10.4 ACRES d N hss s 1 9 w 429 9B N B 5.01. • denotes iron monument found 0 denotes iron monument set 112 inch diam. iron pipe M • z N N ' T �. o 296.55 1 I `..\ 0 0 N East N I N N O V O C O V 0 `- al a LL r N , N 1p et ✓7 O � u z N s ?• 3 \ �� S 0 100 200 scale to feet N81 '13 - o I V c N 0 w ' T PRELIMINARY SKETCH OF PROPOSED PLAT PART OF SE 114 OF NE 114 OF SEC. 26, T. 117 HL, R. 30 W. DAN HUEBERT, DEVELOPER Y_ `^ 100 ? in j i . April 17,1992 To the Attention of: The Hutchinson City Planning Commission. In Regards to: Permit issued to Cedar Crest Estate, 225 Shady Ridge Rd., Hutchinson, Mn. 55350. On October 29, 1991, Henry and Rosalind Ewald were granted a permit for remodeling and an addition to Cedar Crest Estate. Because of financing difficulties we were unable to start the addition at that time. However, we are very hopeful that the financing will be going through very soon and we will be able to start the addition this spring. At this time we would like to request an extension on the variance. The plans for the addition and remodeling will be the same as what was approved last fall. Respectfully, • is Henry and Rosalind Ewald 67498 205th St. Darwin, Mn. 55350 q" I 4 AP919 RECEIVED STATE OF MINNESOTA r a� 2` `EQ£6 COUNTY OF MCLEOD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota. THE Pf1RPOSE OF SAID M EETING is to con sider the applications fcr Platting and Rezoning h eretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Skip (Howard) Quade. Said application for Platting relates to Sioux Hills No. 2. Said Rezoning Application has been submitted for a Rezoning from an Agricultural District to a Rural Residential District to allow single family non -farm dwellings. • THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Platting and Rezoning is anticipated and situated in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit: The Wz of the NW; of Sec 35, Twp 117N, Range 30W. Except the S 720' thereof and except the N 550' of the W 792' thereof. Also that part of Govt Lots 7 and 8 of said Sec 35, described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of said Govt Lot 8; thence S 89 degrees 25 minutes 03 seconds E, assumed bearing, along the N line of said Govt Lot 8 a distance of 1317.91' to the N} corner of said Sec 35; thence S 0 degrees 37 minutes 26 seconds W 677.24'; thence S 28 degrees 35 minutes 36 seconds E 565.63'; thence S 89 degrees 37 minutes 58 seconds E 381.07' to the W'ly line of SIOUX HILLS; thence SE'ly and S'ly, along said W'ly line, to the • (continued on reverse) most S'ly corner of said SIOUX HILLS; thence S'ly 73.77' along a tangential curve • concave to the W, having a radius of 558.52' and a central angle of 7 degrees 34 minutes 05 seconds; thence S'ly, tangent to said curve, 254.18' to the N line of the S 720' of said Govt Lot 7; thence W'ly, along said N line, to the W line of said Govt Lot 7; thence N'ly, along said W line and along the W line of said Govt Lot B, to the point of beginning. THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in opposition to or support of the proposed Plattin; and Rezoning. Thereafter, the McLeod County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission. . DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992. Edwin E. Homan McLeod County Zoning Administrator • • 1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County 11 � 130 i APR 1992 m RECEPIW m rn Br�, � — STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF MCLEOD Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota. THE PURPOSE OF SAID MIEETING is to consider an application for a Ccndi*_ Use Permit heretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Timothy Albrecht. Said application for a Conditional Use Permit relates to a confined feedlot (dairy farm) exceeding one animal unit per acre. THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Conditional Use is anticipated and situated • in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit: That part of Lot 24 of the Auditor's Plat of Lot 15 of the Auditor's Plat of Sec 7, Twp 116N, Range 29W of the 5th P.M., described as follows: Commencing at the SE corner of said Sec 7; thence N 89 degrees 18 minutes 13 seconds W, assumed bearing, along the S line of the SE} of said Sec 7 a distance of 1032.94'; thence N 0 degrees 41 minutes 26 seconds E 1699.71' to the S line of said Lot 24 (being the S line of said Lot 15 of the Auditor's Plat of Sec 7) and the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing N 0 degrees 41 minutes 26 seconds E 297.57' to the intersection with a line parallel with and 400.00' S'ly of, as measured at a right angle to, the N line of said Lot 24; thence E'ly, along said parallel line and its E'ly prolongation, 358.15' to the center line of Cty Hwy No. 25; thence SE'ly, along said center line, a distance of 329.76' to said S line of Lot 24; thence W'ly along said S line, to the point of • beginning. Subject to an easement for roadway purposes over the S'ly 66.00' thereof. NE i�.a caar c« i n� e ct+r (continued on reverse) A.I Aczc C -AW rN�Y+C- t zCA AA s w 22 Mtrs 2L �-.T, Dn nJ1 THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in opposition to or support of the proposed Conditional Use. Thereafter, the McLeod County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission. DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992. Edwin E. Homan McLeod County Zoning Administrator • HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH 000E 6 RANGE 29 WEST YYTDIrR3Dn - lags ZI Tra M•M r A } ` 1 0 [ w• .�I.— • . 1 . i iiv:�.a Y 'u• I Q � .ua llpJ�iL° uI I u n i I _ I t_ If /// / _ '° • ' Cf� Rf IG{. / y 1 1 • it S] +l lf�l v U f� Y I 0 A I \ \ ,� =.ry y � - _ - tUBaG 1 • • IRm l LI] 0., pY I[F• � l •.Ar•L � .[Si YA LDI I ,! Sp .w . fe YRS •LCEN JCN CTTE !11•}Zlr[ `• .c YMr OA�OS \ p "u;. MO[. 1 r STNa2Y 101EL WMC1H L - a • 1 • Rf^ , QiCCAR E5` VCIIETIE K RI••fA ^� }te 1 r AJAA O lv� I �o• [w JO. iVALE] IN•Cx0 ••IZDD •[ Cn �C '�: � ei t rm •� ® .. n • []i 4 PnaL+ l aE6CCa I sr ' a0 'vlvw a MEKCA a "' NOII II(( E �� ELSQ . Yye 'AE • ,N ]EL L[RS 'In Qa GW � �' ilCr� •' •' I }VYCY .•<F IQS(fl •' F'E ��F O 1 • NA NE , ^°` •, "ERT OA FILK I" ..Y �'/i/ /_ es 4 c \: ^\^ or •x < — JCU � �, . 7 xruLD ` E.e ` ' •q LIC[N �s. e. •nsr emw ICD � naw � JAYES MavIN a L �, •a A a InNUO .� FJO CL rNE p am (G�IAHfN] Lfl ELD _4rYA PYMER OAS R4 e - pl I 1 I [..., .RS GauLEA ra Ml] Illwll a �AI•Dr' j. I I a wLRIN/ nu •••www THE 35 s D(YVILD R t ULMET I re , .I rapl • (•' 'In a I a O R13 OMSr �' / . a . R N llil _ �J a`'L fY1 ••lD IW Y I ES . sa •—L RWHT urr •'1i D'Jr40 H aGER] a ME ILL 1 'T, E A A nEll : - r •'. S)1_ �J zx IM f 1 ! MYH•OY • An I KYIrVI -OJ Lr ARLES e 1 . l z ��. LAn a •T�idEETER la ea A� 9a NItEN • aL a aA[' ME LGRES 2'JGIW ILLS •a REIfCR ` M ] <0.1NC I u uL M FALf6 ALL I :. 1REEN Q' YME] I f / _ GRLEY p� u ReAH J am . / IRIEWE . 11 7 EPER . I 1 �, L W_ .r •NW ' - DYAAD s EDw•ac J J Eu�EK 1 ' 1•� r5T,,E,, E a J : ]w•EtElr- \ L LnaN •ELLLI O ••l C jpl 4 ` •i£D �iIE a bl - 11 I EVLEIE [ST = erPa EDr}H o I YlY plgOpt - .I A. L 1 EPSQr w�.A • lU • A- ' N� a T NAM a _ LEOI'Y 11D T { � t + R � • L E FAAMS aoc LeAUI I • �]L,E_aL I rx. . � � =_a I .. 1 VEPNI]N [mss'• V REN ILL.LAN f a ■.MINI im a / e :CCMIiZ DRE]SEL atr+L �n•• PETER]ep R•�N • r..0 =CBE�I �� { n rt0 9 MLOA Q �r WANI ^N rl '' • moo lq V H 5[NrARZC ,ISLE• U•.D D a •i ' K• a u..AI • @I RED LLA rw[[.L "m [LEEK YCLA[ • 'Q [A kt ) a ®Q E-0W9•IA 6E`3 E L" n I ]T a • R 32 VI! e DITO Q ' l.n•U• OIWLES Y PMN WN SCN'Naa xf •RD ME - DAL[ �' 0 ' JD1a6O• ARGrF aAH{O'w l "_ L NAII aE iEA] : a• gam. LST APC] vC OR a [�n M•i. ' [EAEO cr> I RIVER CARL . �� ETaL - `RRAiME . r <. CM TE99 w ^ m Cni Sa H1IEN :�� ?OL . �S �I . ?SZ� •O 4 J SIMTER MLLE 101 TVa SMALL TACT OWN[ES � o... .� ..... .r — T7 T- 129q �j LL 2170 ATT 1rt tc IT 44K T I ql� 'i ?4 0 APR 1992 m RECEIVED • STATE OF MINNESOTA BY_ LO COUNTY OF MCLEOD Sae2 18pE6j NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota. THE PURPOSE OF SAID MEETING is to consider an application for a Conditional Use P ermit heretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Oliver Johnson. Said application for a Conditional Use Permit relatesto the placement of a mobile home as an accessory to another dwelling for the care of another family member. THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Conditional Use is anticipated and situated in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit: • Beginning at a point on the W'ly 75' right -of -way line of MN State Trunk Hwy No. 15, 939.2' S of the N line of the NEI of Sec 13; thence W'ly on a line parallel with the N line of said NE$, 325'; thence S'ly on a line parallel with the said W'ly 75' right -of -way line, 603.1'; thence E'ly on a line parallel with the N line of said NE} 325' to the said W'ly 75' right -of -way line; thence N'ly along said right -of -way line 603.1' to the point of beginning; said tract containing 4.70 acres more or less, all in Twp 116N, Range 30W, subject to that certain mortgage to the Hutchinson Federal Savings and Loan Association which parties of the second part assume and agree to pay according to its terms excepting therefrom the N 200 feet thereof. (continued on reverse) L 9 __R_*L1_ I THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in opposition to or support of the proposed Conditional Use. Thereafter, the McLeod County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission. DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992. Edwin E. Homan McLeod County Zoning Administrator F 11 L T LYNN COOE•s HASSAN VAL1 r.A[i I, Tti. R AW E 30 WESTowNSHp 06 NORTH COOE-6 MUTCHNSON M,HI w M r (.•DC a r t r au / Orrp L DART, a w0 . • OS ] JPw50. C.a[F wvti.w \ \ I - • Y_ r �'. YRS 4E£N " MIE wNNET TE '\, \ \\ \\ �\ I \ D a • J ) GYEGOII L[ISEL WTIENi _ c I a aME r • L (p ''C 1 �< L E, IIKN4,J 4t •Qa M' uEllY11 WCFD.NS ,1 Iq I aYSwC)7 .MU O r .cw�L o. . Y ' O� e g ss5 _ �_ — Eo r `. -<'•. e MS•1 I( °1°'� I aw � m + 'a r 7l -r � nm icti]o... luYaw TT Mr�v i• ''� 5 1 x00 a IM 1 nSr+'rNCNOfrr 'r r.. v IiBEM ELLA x IR(.� ' 1 x� ]o ll+•xllA" /� /n =.n, . '/— I• rILC or C WIIiCNi ENT X'� ' t MRrO� �" DONALD r '3 x a BRINK ED 4E£RTSS. rLF lC�gyl MEL \IN a C ARS �\ . IRE [ \ ! '. .. -f' -"', 1 q • Orr I rr!-rC,C a 15CV r • t r v0.A r e Rr �.�'• � , � I LDJ< GmJf CA Ta t zm II , WM.H Ac 7 t0_rq n . ti. r CARTER r a••IETZ ''OS•fY rl .[r° -. LirsJ•a L f A DORIS - - �\'i 1 adrr[_W� `�• 6 ( RCY T • .D .0 . [ :.LSJ- f 1 S rJ T�11GE5 DL A, -•� b = C'_1_! fwM fy� y rrw�Rl. C n J SI/. I] n MMGrrT [ (. NI. Y W ]r_�R.in /. .VI•t At..rWl.\ Z •.0 L �1 J f 1- r] . C5 (.r6 114 Y y�4 —OM a RR NE m MO �. x � IC 5 I 1U911CCE MEII CARL nl_ )t •J I ••_1 KRNp. L ..J r+a• f1] [...a ° LN. a .ER I)S Ne A E T _ e;Jb«N ELVa� CD f� `• REllfif x` le•x �i r,w , W'•rfi'� " +' a �: ie. I EVER" a� aM ;. rr- /..E)• • ^wYC J a ELLR n L " EuctxE • `r IN �� jrQr N " J , USM��•rN - i+�r/" II aA)n C'J 'E:Kfrf � STE VEx e IKlu,/.� r1 - � r ,i ab r . Mr INf.c 5]R. ] •� own L r D MRAN _ C.. _ I C EUGEH CNO _ Il]O Dam 0150 0Mb ' ��,�`(FhE • _ .r )• ' ECRi.r. ELY I ( WRIC Ems 2 Mo I o l c � �� A , tlIiCNS �.� LJ4 ` r .•l. 9: !i[ LC 1P J torpor [ 7 �J r 1.0 .•fPt •( ISO R ANSLN ' _ fO 1 T ,." ' ,`✓�• ( t NARYET C IF[ Imulm ws:ER.aw I ,• "O , l ` [ ��D LD DE. • ao. raRM� f� xRDy Leaol I b0(t:sL m I \ n.EY.N ` vERNON �A D L.L£ a' a /RYrN ME95F1 • I T611REN OI v.s.• • S'. 1 O n I .. Ql N1PM C C9L Jl-- -- [ SI D I rVx( i f n YEYrTZ T m[i4 _ C"API-= L �o I +.: .L. SGT • 1Kli I mrY. JOG ^ e li mu[4 TN 3�� `[LCD ONO.• rl! vE3 EL' n E ElEM c..r.r 3 m. L . •. Al a CI:o: Tat NaORCN.L a0• / �.. - RGN DOM •' - S RZJ DAL ORD/ [ jL�.�. •L '[ :�DE?x I"'D h. • n'. ��L. IE 1161N9• • NAb .EiEltl `� r JLCSJI LTD. Iw (• R.n IIOI- T r[- ' IO.Lr[• !•D \E MTS ID • lH( rrC.[ C� .ROT � R. VAL LOIR.wE x • [42.t r r.'rrV + . MMEI R nra.tl0 INIlE II mm :a SIMTER I.Afd MI SMALL 72ACT OWNERS SMALL TRACT OWNERS ti Nor- llffmqlm.Lp� A c L G o 13 Co , Nor; TG sc �►! c l 7 q�v� a} y Al I 3Y a r j � �L2_ 7 t J � I • REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING a a a��e APRIL 28, 1992 _ = c�= a�- asaaae = c =�moca WATER & S EWER FUND *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 797.71 Aagard West April Services 5,968.00 Bro Tex Towels 74.10 Central Garage March Repairs 1,691.72 Citizens Bank & Trust Savings Bond 50.00 Devries, Randy Dinner Expense 13.82 Doug Johnsn Safety Shoes 46.87 DPC Containers & Chemicals 345.00 Feed Rite Acid 834.92 Hach Lab Supplies 66.90 Hutchinson Hospital Inv. 889154 -1 35.00 Hutchinson Utilities March Services 267.85 Ingman lab Lab Test 126.00 League of MN Cities Retro Adjustment 2,283.00 MN Valley Testing Testiing 159.50 NCL Lab Supplies 94.90 PERA Employer Contribution 467.82 SVEN 95414 Repairs 110.00 Vessco Parts 294.09 Water Products Meters 432.00 Total 14,159.20 • C ENTRAL GARAGE FUND *Withholding Tax Account Employer Contribution 102.39 Ag Systems Valve 17.50 Carquest Filters 70.02 Case Equipment Repair Kits 339.98 C.E. Meyers Truck Service Freight 636.00 Hutch Wholesale Supplies 36.76 PERA Employer Contribution 59.96 Schramm Implement Motor 79,19 Twin City Garage Door Transmitters 78.00 Total 1,419.80 • // -A' 1 . GENERAL FUND 1 • *Dept. of Nat. Res. Title Reg. Fees 58.00 *Dept. of Nat. Res. Registration Fees 421.00 *Madden's Resort Registration -K. Johnson 275.00 *MN Dept of Revenue Sales Tax - Civic Arena 608.26 *Withholding Tax Account Employer Contribution 5,454.33 AM Hotel Register Co. Waxed Bags 75.60 American Risk April Services 800.00 Arnold & McDowell April Compensation 3,230.00 Athletic Technologies Maintenance 99.00 Beadell, J. & Ewert, J. Housing Rehab. Loan 2,283.00 Bennett Office Binders 74.00 Berger, M. & Schlect Const.Housing Rehab. Loan 2,123.27 Bernhagen, John April Compensation 2,019.00 Bethke, Sherry & TEK Housing Rehab. Loan 1,565.00 Bethke, S. & Bonn. Elect. Housing Rehab. Loan 772.00 Brown's Floral Plant- Holman 20.00 Camera Shop Prints 18.20 Central Garage March Repairs 10,058.54 Christenson, Dorothy Sr. Expo Refund 8.00 Copy Equipment Ammonia 28.85 County Treasurer Driver's License Fees 191.50 Crow River Glass Glass 20.00 Curtis Ind. Blades 57.24 Dept. of Nat. Res. DNR Reg. Fees 341.00 Field, Wanda Class Refund 8.00 • Floor Care Supply Mats 355.00 Forbes Auto Repairs & Supplies 413.05 Gregor, John Electrical Supplies 21.62 G.F. Nemitz Stain 18.95 Haasl, James Velcro 4.32 Home Bakery Inv. 4356 24.00 Hutch Cellular 2 Cellular Phones 800.00 Hutch Fire & Safety Extinguisher Rechg. 26.30 Hutch Iron & Metal Inv. 22010 8.28 Hutch Iron & Metal Iron 3.00 Hutch Plbg & Htg Repairs 83.10 Hutchinson Utilities March Services 9,135.77 Hutch. Conv. & Vistor B. March Lodging Tax 1,734.32 Hutch. Police Dept. Film 15.66 Kirby Co. Parts 15.70 Krsiean, Eileen Sr. Expo Refund 8.00 K -Mart Supplies 14.75 Law Enforement Equip. Name Bar 16.70 League of MN Cities Retro Adj. - Work Comp. 110,155.00 Marco Maintenance Contract 1,071.00 Mark I Calendar Refill 26.91 McGarvey Coffee Coffee 27.45 Merrill, Kenneth B. LOGIS Training 63.64 Miracle Rec Equipment Hangers 123.31 MN Blueprint Inv. 1138493 39.42 • MN Chapter IAAI Dues 10.00 MN Playground Modular Playsystem 3,464.55 MN UC Fund 1st Qtr Unemployment 1,768.56 Mogard, Steven Glasses 70.95 Motor vehicle Mueller, Lloyd National Fire Protection Northern States Supply • Paulsen, Adair PC Express PC Express Pearce, Lorraine PERA PERA -DCP _ Peterson, Folmer Pioneerland Library Prints Charming Quill Corporation Schewe, Brett Schnobrich, Mark Schramm Imp. Service Master Shopko Stepp Mfg. Templeton, Inc. Turf Supply Twin City Garage Door UBC Urban Communications Victorian Inn West Publishing Xerox Zee Medical Sales Tax & License 509.00 Ordway Refund 72.00 Renewal 75.00 Screws 5.34 Show Announcer 150.00 Modules 90.00 Inv. #128218 64.00 Ordway Refund 36.00 Employer Contribution 4,850.28 Employer Contribution 28.71 Class Refund 16.00 2nd Qtr Payment 15,763.25 T- Shirts 1,980.90 Opti -Fluid 38.72 Refund - Shelter 13.00 Lunch Expense 10.00 Shipping (2.65) Cleaning 80.25 Photos & Frames 49.74 Repairs 987.00 Employer Contribution -April 194.68 Inv. #36371 738.88 Transmitters 40.00 Supplies 97.15 Equipment Rent 145.00 Rent & Mtg.- Luncheon 488.92 Books 182.75 March Useage 416.96 Supplies 241.90 Total 187,490.88 • BOND FUNDS RURAL FIRE DEPT Engle Fabrication YOUTH CENTER *Withhold Tax Acct Coast to Coast Farm & Home Henry's Foods Hutch Leader MN State Treasurer PERA Scott Wakefield Tombstone Pizza Viking Coca Cola tools employer contribution supplies supplies supplies advertising food license Employer Contribution June rent = pizzas supplies TOTAL 1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV E.Quast & Rutz Plbg HCDC loan s 65.26 65.91 24.67 16.17 275.78 29.04 50.25 38.60 750.00 78.45 22.75 $1,351.62 12,000.00 • Triple H & O CD payment 2,037.60 • • Block /8 21 Hassan Street 45 Hassan 126 lot AV* N E Lot 1 2 4 S - Migen Lot 3 - Jandusek Lot 47 Farmer elevator Fare Service Elks Laundromat Christopher Trucking Simonson's Railroad Dakota Rail /State of Mn Total Acquistion eal Estate Taxes lition Asbestos Removal Consultant Cost of Financing Bond Discount Capitalized Interest Ads. A contingency Total Funding source Resale/ trade bldg. Bond Sale Total -/)aU,A, ti �umMA 4 ti. � y 1 r� ` \ 37,500 65,000 253,853 233,853 40,000 40,000 Estimate 283,853 438,853 85,000 85,000 90,000 90,000 215,000 215,000 40,000 40,000 1,000 1,000 5,2501 5,250 96,321 98,321 Condemnation 4,878 4,878 537,449 537,449 531,302 iJ 976,302 20, DOD �� 20,000 110,000- 20,000 - 7 110,000 20,000 43.000 45.000 19,000 19,000 9,000 9,000 75,000 75,000 40,698 40,698 1,170,000 1,315,000 595,000 595,000 575,000 {85,000 150,000 __ ___ ___ _ _ ____ -------------- 1,170,000 1,230,000 Wib �_) / Urli (es,000) �FX /iva/Z e L • C. April 21, 1992 Mr. Dan Huebert P.C.S. 1110 Hwy. 7 East Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Dan: I believe City Council approval and /or direction is required regarding the consumption of liquor near the proposed vollyball courts which will likely increase the required parking, due to the increased serving area. Building Permit No. 10677 to install a patio sliding door in the Flyers Nightclub is being placed on hold until the Flyers liquor license and parking issue is resolved. • • Best regards, ` ^CI\TYY OF HUTCHINSOSON� Q, ��Q/plgp � I ' K"vc(.. James G. Marka Building Official JGM /ms cc: Tom Dolder an Prochnow Gary Plotz, City Administrator Steve Madson, Chief of Police G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West (612) 587 -5151 Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street (612) 587 -2975 Police Department 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on w"cled ralxr - HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL MINUTES • The monthly Hutchinson Safety Council meeting was held at noon, March 29, 1992 at the McLeod County Heritage Center. There were 13 members attending. The program was presented by Jim Faber who showed the video, Driveline (PTO) Safety and You. The video was produced last year at a cost of $70,000. President George Field opened the meeting. The February minutes were approved as submitted. Old Business Leslie Smith did not look into reserving a booth on April 13 & 14 at the Home Show to be held at the Civic Arena because we would need somone to "man" the booth. New Business AA bill was submitted by Joyce Rix in the amount of $29.00 and was approved for payment. Because of the excellent quality and safety message and low cost of $7.00, a motion was made by Les Smith and seconded by Joyce Rix that the video viewed today on Driveline Safety be purchased and loaned to the City Maintenance Dept, 4 -H • Clubs, the Vo -Tech School and other interested groups. The motion carried unanimously; Jim Faber will order the video. President George Field presented the $25.00 annual renewal notice payable to the Minnesota Safety Council. Les Smith moved that the membership dues be paid; Marlin Torgenson seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Safety concerns noted: Look into the feasibility of having a crosswalk located on South Grade Road between the Civic arena and the mall. The pigoen droppings have become a problem and health concern to residents located near downtown. Streets near the rec fields on Linden Ave are the only parking areas for these fields and become congested with children and parents and are a safety concern. It was noted that parents must be responsible for their children in these areas. The next meeting will be held on Monday April 27, 1992 at noon at the Heritage Center. John Rodeberg, City Engineer will present the program. • Checking Balance: $408.36 Savings Balance: $194.47 Y Board of Directors Meeting -- Crow River Arts, Inc. April 2, 1992 - t"h 7:00 pi I The meetin was called to order by Chra. Bob Wilde. He introduced our ex Executive Direcf n.+ Schuh Others present were: Bette Hubin, Brian Brosz, Joy Berg, Joyce Young and SMAHC DirectorRob Ross. Missing were teachers /brd. members Kimberly Liedel, Shanda Landes and Mavis Schwanke who.had conferences. Minutes of the last meeting were accepted as corrected. The financial report was approved and subject to audit at the end of the fiscal year - Bette /Joy. Bills were submitted for approval totaling $1113.64 - Joyce /Brian. Balance in checking is 649.27 and in saving $6243.42 as of 3/31/92. Correspondence: Information only - Red Wing Arts, Grand Marias Art Colony and Nat'l Arts Placement. Bette Hubin will complete survey for M. Ass'n of Community Theaters. Mn. Citizens for Art (MCA) material will be sent to the attention of Butch hereafter. COMMITTEES: Program Registration of classes for Summer - Sign up with Park and Rec Activities. Joyce will contact teachers on Summer flyer to be at the registration table. Bette Hubin will be available to help if needed. Summer Theater - MSF Bette /Brian - We will hold Summer Theater in July with State Arts H.S. students if it has a proper Director and funding becomes available. We can apply for Guarantee against loss funding one month before the program starts. This will assist in planning. Any.future programming (after July) for September and beyond can be applied for through SMAHC. Chamber of Commerce - Bette /Brian - to have Butch meet with Nel Gilman to seek a joint Chamber /Arts liaison person, namely Nel. D"ette&Butch will check • files to participate in Water Carnival Activities as best we can. MSP - Bette /Brian. Featured Artist - Joyce will write up an article. Butch and Joy will get out publicity in SMAHC, Newspaper - Shanda and Turid can get info in ARTBEAT. Networking Exhibits - Bette will contact Steve Menze for April and work with him to set up future exhibits. Workshop - Gwen Leopaldt should be contacted if at least 5 are committed to attend. Charges are to include an amount to Crow River Arts (CRA) with total $120.00 brought in. MSP - Joyce /Bette Volunteer - Ardeane Summerfi6ld has scheduled a Training session on Thurs, May 7 in morn. Publicity Butch will talk to Shanda about Artbeat, etc. Nominating - Ann Reid and Ellie Becker will serve on committee. Joyce will try to find one more. Membership - MSP Brian/Joy to insert the word "minimum" at each classification level. A goal of 250 new individual and business members was set. $4,000.00 Will be the target level to be reached. The strategy will be introduced at the next meeting. BUSINESS: Annual meeting and election - Tentative date - Thursday, June 4, 1992 Butch will review old By -Laws for rotation and length of term for board members. MSP Brian/Joy To be completed by meeting - Past year report by secretary and treasurer) new programs for action, budget. 0 Information notes - Linda Baysinger Peck - to be taken home to look over. Director report - Butch Director report - Butch 1. Key control - will check on who has keys and how it could be handled by volunteers. 2. MSP Brian /Joyce to give Butch authorization to purchase supplies within guidelines of the budget. • 3.Butch has board approval to purchase and place bulletin -type boards for display, etc. 4.MSP Joyce /Joy - Butch may have printed business cards with his title - Consultant Directo 5. Communications with Park and Rec, Chamber of Commerce, etc. have begun. Butch will speak to groups in other communities, to Hutch Optimists and in time to establish membershi growth. 6. Joyce will contact Letty Bernhagen regarding the Hutch Women's Club Art Center project. It is believed that of the 2500.00 pledged 900.00 was spent for the piano and 1400.00 remains to come in towards a computor. This information is necessary for planning. 7. MSP Joyce /Brian to authorize Butch to participate in JTPA, CETA, & /or other training or summer youth programs that may be available for state funded monies for youth training. 8. MSP Joyce/Brian to ratify the Board's action of the working agreement on March 16,1992 Butch will bring a base one, percentages and so forth to the next board meeting. Other business - Board rotation - and election was discussed further. Tentatively Bob Wilde, Joyce Young, Stemple Johnson and Kimberly Liedel are eligible to go off the board. Length of term and status of board members was also discussed. Next meeting Thursday, May 7, 1992 at 7100 p.m. Brian moved to adjourn. Submitted by Joyce Young, Secretary �u� �lL�Lli7� o � • ' TENTATIVE BUDGET REF 0 ITEM BUDGETED ADD'L REV. TOTAL FUNDS AV. MONTHLY M. EXP TO DATE BALANCE OVER�nq 7$00.00 - 7500.00 625.00 6250.00 1250.00 Insurance 250.00 - 250.00 - 250.00 - Utilities 900.00 - 900.00 61.27 625.77 274.23 Bldg. Rep. k Faint. 100.00 - 100.00 - 26.80 73.20 Postage 300.00 - 300.00 - 214.70 85.30 Equipment 1100.00 - 1100.00 - 1100.00 - Off. Supplies k Exp 600.00 - 600.00 37.39 325.87 271.13 Fed. /State Fees 100.00 - 100.00 - 60.00 40.00 Ass'n Fees 150.00 - 150.00 - 75.00 75.00 Advertising 750.00 - 750.00 - 723.06 26.94 Prof. Training 150.00 - 150.00 - 30.00 120.00 Contract Labor 7200.00 - 7200.00 - 2804.63 4 395.37 TOTAL 19100.00 - 19100.00 770.66 12485.83 6614.17 PROGRAM /ACTIVITIES Art - 439.98 439.98 - 278.37 161.61 Children's Theat. - 2741.00 2741.00 - 3201.92 (460.92 Classes - 965.90 965.90 47.00 1409.86 (443.963 Concert /Symphony - 3545.00 3545.00 - 3996. (451.40) Nalkathon - 244.00 244.00 - 158.78 85.22 TOTAL - 7935. 7935.88 47.00 9 (1109.45) ioinn nn 22a5.88 27035.88 817.66 21531 16 5504.72 DUES GRANTS 380.00 15000.00 Fund Raisers 60.00 Rent 10.00 Refunds 65.00 Interest 41.68 Scholarship Fund 3 TOTAL 15881.68 Checking Acc't Bat. as of Checking Acct Bal. 649.27 Saving Acct Bal. 6243.42 YEAR TO DATE 23817.