cp06-09-1992 cI - I IJ TCI'11 0i'�-1
CITY
UiLENDAR
VfEEIt OF
June 7 TO June 13 9
1092
SUNDAY
i
MONDAY
TLjVAY
-7-
-8-
: 111Lv*
We
salute
Ir new
V!E.DNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY
_10- -11- -12-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Hall
Noon - Rail Authority 6 Y
Shippers Assn.
'Meeting at
Victorian Inn =
I
i
I
LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE
JUNE 9 -12
* * * * * * * * * * * * * **
6:30 P.M. - Closed City Council
Meeting at City
Hall Re. Junker
Litigation
7:30 P.M. - Regular City
Council Meeting
at City Hall
SATURDAY
-13-
VACATION /MEETINGS:
CHUCK NELSON - June'8 -9
BONNIE BAUMETZ - June 9
GEORGE FIELD - June 10
MARILYN SWANSON - June 11 -16
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 9, 1992
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Ed Hollen, Assembly of God
3. Consideration of Minutes
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1992 and May 12, 1992; Special
Meeting of May 20, 1992
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Building Official's Report - May 1992
2. Hospital /Nursing Home Board Minutes of April 21,
1992
• 3. Parks & Recreation Board Minutes of April 29, 1992
4. Planning Commission Minutes of April 21, 1992
(b) Application for On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor
License By Hutchinson Huskies Amateur Baseball
Association for Summer Months At Veterans Memorial Park
(c) Appointments:
1. Police Commission -
2. Utilities Commission -
3. Tree Board - Jay Beytien and Virgil Voigt
(d) Use of Library Square On August 23, 1992 By Bethlehem
United Methodist Church
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed,
issue license, ratify appointments, and approve use of
park
11
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA -
JUNE
9, 1992
•
Public Hearing
- 8:00
P.M.
(a) Assessment Roll No. 276, Letting No. 2, Project Nos.
92 -02 & 92 -09
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject -
Motion to approve and adopt roll and award contract -
Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
6. communications. Requests and Petitions
(a) Considertaion of Request for Police Department
Secretary to Attend Out -of -State Seminar
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 9734 - Resolution to Rename Fischer Hill
to Boy Scout Park
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt •
(b) Resolution No. 9735 - Resolution Authorizing
Application for Serve America National And Community
Service Act Funds
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
(c) Resolution No. 9736 - Resolution Specifying And
Approving The Application Form For Collecting, Hauling,
or Conveying Of Garbage, Other Refuse, Mixed Municipal
Solid Waste Or Recyclable Materials
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
S. Unfinished Business
NONE
9. New Business
(a) ITEM WITHDRAWN
E
•
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 9, 1992
(b) Consideration of Rescheduling Special City Council
Meeting On June 15, 1992 Regarding Dispatch Service
Action -
(c) Consideration of Proposed HCDC And HRA Changes In
Organizational Structure And Employment of Full -Time
Director
Action -
(d) Consideration of Application to Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency to Accept Leachate from McLeod County
Landfill
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration of Lease Agreements with School District
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreements
(f) Consideration of Downtown Life Safety Grant Program
• Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to order plans and specifications and advertise for
bids
(g) Consideration of City Removing Interest Charges On
Repayment of Loan for Burns Manor Nursing Home
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(h) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment
Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 4,
Project No. 92 -07 (First Avenue N.E.)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll
preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive reading
and adopt Resolution
(i) Consideration of Receiving Report And Waiving Hearing
And Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering
Advertisement for Bids On Letting No. 12, Project No.
92 -18 (Hutchinson Utilities)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
accept report/plans & specifications and advertise for
• bids - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 9, 1992 is
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. Adjournment
4
11
•
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen
Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson.
Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer
John Rodeberg, and Assistant City Attorney Joseph Paiement.
r • •
The invocation was given by the Reverend Harold McGowan.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the bid openings of March 17, 1992 and April
13, 1992, continued regular meeting of March 20, 1992, special
meeting of April 1, 1992, and regular meeting of April 14,
1992 were approved as distributed.
0100C. M.
• (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - MARCH 1992
2. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF FEB. 13, 1992
3. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 17 & MARCH 24,
1992
4. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 2, 1992
5. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF FEB. 26, 1992
6. REPORT OF CITY INVESTMENTS
(b) RECONFIRMATION OF APPROVED GAMBLING LICENSE FOR ELKS
LODGE AS REQUESTED BY STATE GAMBLING BOARD
(c) APPLICATIONS FOR ON -SALE NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR
LICENSES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
• 6.
7.
CROW RIVER COUNTRY CLUB
GOD FATHER'S PIZZA
GOLD COIN
PIZZA HUT
LITTLE CROW BOWLING LANES
LAMPLIGHTER'S LOUNGE II
J'S SPORTS BAR
A.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992 0
(d) APPLICATIONS FOR OFF -SALE NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR
LICENSES
1. CASH WISE FOODS
2. ERICKSON FREEDOM STATION (HWY. 7 & 15)
3. GEORGE'S FOOD & FUEL
4. CITGO- QUIKMART
5. SOUTHTOWN MOBIL
6. TOM THUMB FOOD MARKET
7. SUPERAMERICA
(e) APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT
1. AMERICAN LEGION POST 96 - MAY 25, 1992
2. MARCH OF DIMES - MAY 17, 1992
The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to order report
and minutes filed, with noted correction to February 26,
1992 Park & Recreation Board Minutes, and to reconfirm
and issue licenses and permits, with the exception of J's
Sports Bar. .
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
• tilrl! • L • • •
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR JAYCEE WATER CARNIVAL
PERMITS:
1. PARADE PERMIT
2. DANCE PERMIT
3. FIREWORKS PERMIT
4. PERMISSION TO CLOSE STREETS AND USE LIBRARY SQUARE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve and issue permits and waive fees
and rentals.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR NON - INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSE AND SET -UP LICENSE FOR JAYCEE WATER CARNIVAL,
JUNE 18 -21, 1992
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman .
2
E
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve and issue license and waive fees.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CITY DONATION TO JAYCEE
WATER CARNIVAL
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve a $2,000.00 donation to 1992 Water
Carnival.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -54 - SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, PUBLIC SITE
AND OPEN SPACES
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to waive first reading and set second reading
for May 12, 1992.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 9698 - REQUESTING MN /DOT FOR COST
PARTICIPATION ON T.H. NO. 22 IMPROVEMENTS, LETTING NO. 3,
• PROJECT NO. 92 -05
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF WELLNESS PROGRAM PROPOSAL
(DEFERRED JANUARY 14, 1992)
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill and Robin Erickson of
the hospital staff reviewed the wellness program. Fol-
lowing discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve the proposal.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF TRANSFER OF CABLE TELEVISION
(DEFERRED JANUARY 28, 1992)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to set May 26, 1992 at 8:00 P.M. for the public
hearing.
• Dave Roselle of D.D. Cable Partners requested the hearing
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992 0
be held on May 12, 1992 since the company would be clos-
ing on the sale the end of May. He was informed the City
must advertise 10 days prior to a public hearing, and
there would not be adequate time to meet the paper's pub-
lication deadline.
(c) UPDATE STATUS OF WORD OF LIFE ISSUES
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to defer.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to authorize
discontinuation of service on May 4 at noon unless other
arrangements had been made.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR:
1. $605,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, •
SERIES 1992
Following a presentation by Bond Consultant Bill Fahey,
the motion was made by Councilman Erickson to award the
bid to Park Investment Corporation and to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9707. Motion seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
2. $325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING RECREATION
CENTER BONDS, SERIES 1992
Based on Mr. Fahey's recommendation, the motion was made
by Councilman Mlinar to award the bid to FBS Investment
Services and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
9708. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and
unanimously carried.
3. $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING IMPROVEMENT
BONDS, SERIES 1992
Based on Mr. Fahey's recommendation, the motion was made
by Councilman Torgerson to award the bid to Norwest
Investment Services and to waive reading and adopt Reso-
lution No. 9709. Motion seconded by Councilman Mlinar
and unanimously carried.
•
4
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REVOKATION OF ISSUANCE OF LIQUOR LICENSE
TO MARK GAARDER, DBA THE HANGAR BAR 6 GRILL; FLYER'S
NIGHT CLUB
Mayor Ackland reviewed the issues concerning the license.
Mark Gaarder stated he had hired a management company to
operate the liquor establishment, and it was headed by
Tom Dolder.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on a parking prob-
lem at the restaurant /bar. He also stated the proposed
sliding glass door would require a building permit. If
the owner intended to serve liquor outside the establish-
ment, he would need a variance on his liquor license.
Also, liquor could not be consumed in the volleyball
court area outside the building.
No action was required at this time.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF REVOKATION OF ISSUANCE OF LIQUOR LICENSE
TO STEVE PICHA, DBA HUTCH PIZZA, INC.; J'S PIZZA GARTEN/
SPORTS BAR
• Mayor Ackland commented on concerns expressed at the last
Council meeting in addition to recent information. He
suggested a public hearing to revoke the license from be-
ing issued and to make it null and void.
Mark Carrigan, attorney for Steve Picha, requested that
the Council delay any action to enable him to pursue the
matter.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson to set a public hearing for May 26, 1992 at
8:00 P.M. and to direct the City legal counsel and Mr.
Picha's legal counsel to meet and discuss the concerns.
Motion seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried.
(e) REVIEW OF 1992 GENERAL FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
Finance Director Merrill reported on the 1992 legislative
tax bill and the addition of a 6.53 sales tax on all city
and county purchases, effective June 1, 1992. He then
requested the Council rescind the actions of the March 10
meeting relating to the City budget.
. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
•
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve the request pertaining to areas 1 -3
and recommendations in 4 as presented and contained in
the Finance Director's memorandum dated April 23, 1992.
(f)
CONSIDERATION OF LICENSING FOR REFUSE HAULERS
Wayne Albrecht, Junker Sanitation manager, inquired about
the pickup of white goods and hard goods as well as the
potential of multiple haulers for the City.
Following discussion of the proposed licensing ordinance,
Councilman Torgerson moved to approve and waive first
reading of Ordinance No. 92 -57 and set second reading for
May 12, 1992. Motion seconded by Councilman Mlinar and
unanimously carried.
(g)
CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
FOR INTERIM GARBAGE PICKUP FOR SERVICE BETWEEN JULY 1,
1992 TO OCTOBER 1, 1992
City Administrator Plotz stated the advertisement would
be for the same type of service as the City presently
had.
•
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve advertising.
(h)
DISCUSSION OF POLICY ALTERNATIVES FOR DELINQUENT AND
DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz to defer. Motion
seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY ON TAX FORFEITURE ASSESSMENTS
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson to defer.
Motion seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF ADVERTISING FOR BIDS TO PURCHASE
COMBINATION JET AND VACUUM TRUCK
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve advertising for bids.
•
M
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
RECESS: The City Council adjourned at 9:55 P.M. for a recess and
reconvened at 10:10 P.M.
(k) DISCUSSION OF HUTCHINSON AREA TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
FACILITY REPORT
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the proposed joint facility
between city /county /state and the potential savings. He
requested authorization to proceed to the next step of
site selection to do soils and environmental studies.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve proceeding to next step.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON
IMPROVEMENT FOR LETTING NO. 9, PROJECT NO. 92 -14 & 92 -15
Following Engineer Rodeberg's report on the project, the
motion was made by Councilman Torgerson to approve and
accept the engineer's report, to do work on project No.
92 -14 only, and to waive reading and adopt Resolution
setting a hearing. Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz.
• The motion was withdrawn.
Councilman Torgerson moved to accept the waiver for a
hearing, to order plans and specifications for project
No. 92 -14, and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions
No. 9699 and No. 9700. Motion seconded by Councilman
Mlinar and carried, with Councilman Erickson abstaining
from voting.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND
ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ON LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT
NO. 92 -07
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve plans and specifications, to adver-
tise for bids, and to waive reading and adopt Resolution
No. 9701.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT
NO. 92 -01
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried, to approve preparation of Assessment Roll No. 275A,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992 •
to hold a hearing on May 12, 1992 at 8:00 P.M., and to
waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9702 and No.
9703.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT
NO. 92 -03 AND NO. 92 -04
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve preparation of Assessment Roll No.
275B, to hold a hearing on May 12, 1992 at 8:00 P.M., and
to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9704 and No.
9705.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING LETTING NO. 1 /PART B FOR
PROJECT NO. 92 -03, PRIEBE ADDITION AND PROJECT NO. 92 -04,
BETKER'S SECOND ADDITION
The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to table.
(q) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING MN /DOT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL .
AGREEMENT FOR LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 92 -08, MAIN
STREET (TH 15) TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve and enter into agreement and to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9710.
(r) DISCUSSION OF GIS /GPS DEVELOPMENT
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the study for development
of a geographic information system data base map and
system. The Hutchinson Utilities Commission provided
funding to complete the GIS data base map ($27,500 esti-
mated total cost), with the understanding that the City
would pay for its share of the costs at some future time.
No action was required.
(s) DISCUSSION OF TREBELHORN /BRANDT ENCROACHMENT AND DRAINAGE
ISSUE
Mr. & Mrs. Robert Brandt, 735 Church Street, stated their
neighbor had violated his building permit with a two foot
encroachment onto the Brandt property. •
8
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
The Assistant City Attorney stated there were three vio-
lations: (1) a trespass claim against Trebelhorn, (2)
violation of building permit, with potential of an in-
junction to remove the additional concrete, and (3)
drainage onto the Brandt property.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to begin legal proceedings against Trebelhorn.
(t) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY. 15 NORTH FOR MINI- STORAGE WITH
UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the recommendation to reject.
(u) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
RICHARD SMITH ON ROBERTS ROAD WITH UNFAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
. Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the recommendation to reject.
•
(v) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT REQUESTED
BY RICHARD SMITH IN STONEY POINT THIRD ADDITION WITH
UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the recommendation to reject.
(w) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEFF
MUNSELL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAR WASH ON HWY. 7 WEST WITH
UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the recommendation to reject.
(x) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF FIRST
ADDITION TO PETERSON TERRACE SUBMITTED BY REDMAN REAL
ESTATE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
Mlinar, seconded
ried, to approve
adopt Resolution
by Councilman Lenz and unanimously car -
the final plat and to waive reading and
No. 9706.
(y) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GOLF VIEW
SUBDIVISION SUBMITTED BY KEVIN COMPTON WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz to approve the preliminary plat and to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9711. Motion seconded by Coun-
cilman Torgerson and carried, with Councilman Erickson
abstaining from voting.
(z) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY SKIP
QUADE, ACOMA TOWNSHIP, TWO MILE RADIUS, WITH UNFAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Skip Quade appealed the Planning Commission's recommenda-
tion to reject his preliminary plat. During discussion
Engineer Rodeberg expressed concerns about future prob-
lems with the septic system and the small lot size.
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve
the preliminary plat and refer to the County with the
stipulations that there be a subdivision agreement and
certified septic systems installed by certified install-
ers.
(aa) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT,
ACOMA TOWNSHIP, TWO MILE RADIUS, WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to refer to
the County with no objection.
(bb) CONSIDERATION OF ONE -TIME SIX MONTH VARIANCE EXTENSION
FOR CEDAR CREST ESTATE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve.
(cc) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL TO
RESIDENTIAL REQUESTED BY SKIP QUADE, TWO MILE RADIUS,
WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
10
•
•
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992
C1
J
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to refer to
the County with a favorable recommendation.
(dd) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FEED LOT
REQUESTED BY TIM ALBRECHT, TWO MILE RADIUS, WITH
UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to refer to
the County with unfavorable recommendation.
(ee) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE MOBILE
HOME REQUESTED BY OLIVER JOHNSON WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to refer to the
County with no objection.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz commented on a recycling problem
at the Civic Arena and suggested several solutions. The
motion was made by Councilman Erickson to eliminate the
recycling bins from the present site and locate them at
the compost site through the summer, with a monitor. Mo-
tion seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN JOHN MLINAR
Councilman Mlinar commented on the recent meeting regard-
ing the dam and commended the Director of Engineering on
how he handled it.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Councilman Torgerson mentioned the discussion of pigeons
in the downtown area at the Safety Council meeting. He
stated something needed to be done.
(d) City Attorney Anderson reported he would prepare some
material on the Word of Life issue for the next meeting.
11
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 28, 1992 •
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg commented on the layout for the Adams
Street project. He stated the County Board authorized
the north two blocks of Jefferson as a temporary county
road during the detour. Therefore, the County will do
repair work on it, and there was a written agreement be-
tween the state and county regarding maintenance.
The Director of Engineering stated two bids were received
to seal the well located at the Dairy Queen. Twin City
Testing submitted a bid for $1,500, and L.T.P. had a bid
for $150.
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to award the
bid to L.T.P.
12.
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the
claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
11:25 P.*M.
12
•
MINUTES
• REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen
Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson.
Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer
John Rodeberg, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2.
The invocation was given by the Reverend Robert Brauer.
3. MINUTES
No minutes were available.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - APRIL 1992
2. HOSPITAL /NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 18,
MARCH 17, AND APRIL 1, 1992
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to order the
report and minutes filed.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR LAMPLIGHTER
LOUNGE II LOCATED IN PLAZA 15, GARY LANDREVILLE, OWNER
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M.
and read the notice of public hearing, Publication No.
4372.
The applicant, Gary Landreville, stated he planned a June
15 opening of the lounge, and his two sons would be the
managers.
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson to close the
hearing at 8:03 P.M. Motion seconded by Councilman Tor -
gerson and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Torgerson, to approve and issue the license.
The motion was amended by Councilman Erickson to show
proof of the manager's residency in Hutchinson. Amended
1�j
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 .
motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried. Main motion unanimously carried.
(b) PROPOSED TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE
The hearing was called to order at 8:05 P.M. Mayor Ack-
land read the notice of hearing, Publication No. 4375.
Attorney Anderson presented a favorable recommendation
from Moss & Barnett. It was the unanimous recommendation
of the HCVN Technical Proposal Review Committee to ap-
prove the transfer of the cable franchise to D.D. Cable
Partners.
Residents submitted a petition requesting cable access to
the Midwest sports channel.
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to close
the hearing at 8:07 P.M. Motion seconded by Councilman
Lenz and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the •
transfer to D.D. Cable Partners and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9723.
(c) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 275A, LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO.
92 -01
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:15 P.M.
and read the notice of hearing, Publication No. 4369.
Engineer Rodeberg commented on the breakdown of costs and
stated most of the funding would come from the state aid
funds.
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close the
hearing at 8:23 P.M.
Councilman Torgerson moved to approve and adopt Roll No.
275A, to award the contract, and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9719. Motion seconded by Councilman
Erickson and unanimously carried.
(d) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 275B, LETTING NO. 1, PROJECTS NO.
92 -03 & 92 -04
The hearing was called to order at 8:25 P.M., and Mayor
Ackland read notice of hearing, Publication No. 4370.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
• Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close the
hearing at 8:26 P.M.
Councilman Erickson moved to approve and adopt Roll No.
275B, to award the contract, and to waive readings and
adopt Resolutions No. 9720 and No. 9721. Motion seconded
by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
C�K•]y1, N31•11*1 .' _ • •
None.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -54 - SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, PUBLIC SITE
AND OPEN SPACES
The motion was made by Councilman Mlinar, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
second reading and adopt ordinance.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -57 - ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING LICENSING
FOR REFUSE HAULERS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
• Torgerson to authorize extending to Junker interim haul-
ing on the residential side alone and for apartment
buildings of four or less units at the present rate, with
the exclusion of trailer courts since they are considered
commercial property. Motion seconded by Councilman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
Councilman Lenz moved to waive first reading of the re-
vised ordinance and set second reading for May 20, 1992.
Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried.
(c) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -58 - ORDINANCE GRANTING MAINSTREET
ASSOCIATION THE RIGHT TO MAINTAIN A POPCORN WAGON IN
LIBRARY SQUARE
During discussion of Section 6, it was the consensus of
the Council that a Resolution would be needed to approve
a lease arrangement for the popcorn wagon on a yearly
basis.
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive first
reading and set second reading for May 26, 1992.
0 3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
- MAY 12,
1992
10
(d) RESOLUTION
NO. 9712
- RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt.
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 9713 - ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
(f) RESOLUTION NO. 9714 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED
SECURITIES FROM MARQUETTE BANK OF HUTCHINSON
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive read-
ing and adopt.
(g) RESOLUTION NO. 9722 - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR
ASSISTANCE FROM MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive read-
ing and adopt.
(h) RESOLUTION NO. 9725 - RESOLUTION TO DECERTIFY ASSESSMENTS
DUE AND PAYABLE IN 1992 FOR THIRD AVENUE N.W. /DAKOTA
RAIL, INC.
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY ON TAX FORFEITURE ASSESSMENTS
(DEFERRED APRIL 28, 1992)
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill presented the pro-
posed policy which would apply to any tax forfeited prop-
erty, including the recent sale of forfeited property.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve staff recommendations.
r1
U
4
•
•
u
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992
(b) DISCUSSION OF POLICY ALTERNATIVES FOR DELINQUENT AND
DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS (DEFERRED APRIL 28, 1992)
Following discussion, no action was taken. The City
Attorney will meet with the County Attorney, County Aud-
itor, Mayor Ackland, Administrator Plotz and Director
Merrill to further discuss the issue and county policies.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO
AWARD CONTRACT FOR WATER /SEWER EQUIPMENT
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve and
set a special meeting for 12:00 noon on May 20, 1992.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR FIRST ADDITION
TO PETERSON TERRACE
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the
subdivision agreement.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY AND INTER-
AGENCY AGREEMENT
Police Chief Steve Madson, Officer David Erlandson, and
Heidi Nelson from the hospital mental health unit, pre-
sented the guidelines for debriefing and the inter - agency
agreement. The hospital will charge a $200 fee for the
actual debriefing session.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve and enter into agreement.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS
ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM FOR HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson to approve, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and
unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR TRANSIENT MERCHANT
LICENSE FOR RICHARD SEIPEL, DBA THE COUNTRY STOP
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 •
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson to approve and issue license, contingent upon
designation of location. Motion seconded by Councilman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 2,
PROJECTS NO. 92 -02 & 92 -09
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to table
to special meeting on May 20, 1992. Motion seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING LETTING NO. 7 & NO. 7B, PROJECT
NO. 92 -12 & 92 -12B (DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT- -PHASE II
DEMOLITION /PURCHASE AND REMOVAL)
Following discussion, Councilman Mlinar moved to table to
special meeting on May 20, 1992. Motion seconded by
Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING LETTING NO. 8, PROJECT NO.
92 -13 (NORTH PARK TENNIS COURT REHABILITATION) •
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz to approve and award contract to Mid Minnesota Hot
Mix, Inc. for $19,520 and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 9718. Motion seconded by Councilman
Erickson and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AGREEMENT WITH BARR ENGINEERI
COMPANY FOR OLD LANDFILL MITIGATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
During discussion it was determined the City staff should
meet with the County Board to discuss cost.
Councilman Erickson moved to table. Motion seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT FOR 1992
Following discussion, Councilman Lenz moved to approve a
3.25 percent increase, retroactive to January 1, 1992.
Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried.
•
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992
•
(k) CONSIDERATION OF PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTERING MERIT PAY
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to fol-
low the staff merit recommendation. Motion seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY ALLEN REINER TO CONSTRUCT A
PRIVATE HANGAR AT HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Allen Reiner stated he was looking for a City policy on
private hangars at the municipal airport.
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to defer
until City staff could present a recommendation. Motion
seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(m) DISCUSSION OF RELOCATION OF HUTCHINSON IRON & METAL
Administrator Plotz stated the relocation would be con-
tingent upon a Planning Commission hearing for a condi-
tional use permit. Following discussion, it was the con-
sensus of the Council that the HCDC work with the owner
to begin the process. No action was taken.
(n) DISCUSSION OF LIQUOR STORE REGARDING PROPOSED DOOR ACCESS
INTO GROCERY STORE
City Attorney Anderson reviewed the State Statute on this
issue and was doing further research. No action was
taken.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR LIQUOR STORE
CONDOMINIUM
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson to approve and enter into agreement. Motion
seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
(p) DISCUSSION OF STEVE PICHA INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
Administrator Plotz stated he was contacted by the
Department of Revenue regarding no filing of sales tax by
Hutch Pizza, Inc. for January, February and March. He
was told a business partner /officer would be held per-
sonally liable for the sales tax, which would affect Mr.
Picha.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992 0
Mayor Ackland requested a verification in writing from
the Department of Revenue stating Mr. Picha would not be
held liable. Otherwise, he would not agree to the City
issuing a liquor license.
Attorney Anderson recommended Mr. Picha determine the
status of the following three areas for further discus-
sion at the special meeting on May 20, 1992: (1) 1992
sales tax for January- March; (2) past due taxes for 1991;
and (3) Liquor Control stamp to resell alcoholic bever-
ages.
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to issue
a liquor license after it was determined that a liquor
stamp would be issued and the Department of Revenue did
not hold Mr. Picha responsible for sales tax in January
through March, 1992. Motion seconded by Councilman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN CRAIG LENZ
Councilman Lenz commented on a memorandum received from a
the City Attorney.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
Attorney Anderson commented on the Word of Life agreement
and recommended the following changes: (1) collection of
the reference to purchase at a tax forfeiture as sale;
(2) reduction of the interest rate to 7 percent; and (3)
elimination of the reference to the due on sale clause.
Following discussion, Councilman Erickson moved to accept
the City Attorney's recommendations. Motion seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg commented on a complaint regarding dust
control in the area of 3M. He stated this project was
dropped for 1992, but it was in the planning for next
year. The City Engineer questioned if chemicals should
be put on the affected streets in the area. He reported
the sidewalk on Fifth Avenue would be removed and gravel
put down.
u
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 12, 1992
•
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland commented on holes around the manholes on
Century Avenue. He had received a complaint regarding
the smell from the spreading of sludge from the waste-
water treatment plant.
12.
•
•
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the
claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
11:15 P.M.
Q
r�
LJ
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MAY 20, 1992 - 12:15 P.M.
Mayor Ackland called the meeting to order at 12:15 P.M. The
following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Councilmen Craig
Lenz, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Absent: Councilman John
Mlinar. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and City
Engineer John Rodeberg.
1. DISCUSSION OF STEVE PICHA INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
Following discussion, no action was taken.
2. ORDINANCE NO. 92 -57 - ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING LICENSING FOR
REFUSE HAULERS
The motion was made by Councilman Erickson, seconded by Coun-
cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive second
reading and adopt and to publish ordinance in the newspaper.
3. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WATER /SEWER EQUIPMENT
(BIDS OPENED MAY 18, 1992)
Following discussion, Councilman Erickson moved to award con-
tract to ABM Equipment & Supply Company for a total price of
$133,220, which includes the trade -in of the City's unit for
a 1991 demonstration model, truck mounted sewer and catch
basin cleaner. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and
unanimously carried.
Councilman Erickson moved to approve Doug Meier, Ken Wichter-
man and Merle Meece be allowed to travel to the Vactor Factory
in Streator -, Illinois, to pick up the unit and receive in-
house training in the operation and repair of this machine.
Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
4. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING LETTING NO. 7 AND NO. 7B, PROJECT
NO. 92 -12 AND 92 -12B (DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT - PHASE II
DEMOLITION /PURCHASE AND REMOVAL) (DEFERRED MAY 12, 1992)
Following discussion, Councilman Torgerson moved to award the
project No. 92 -12 contract to Towne Construction for $57,660.
Motion seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously carried.
Following discussion of damage done to Wigen's metal building
after bids were received, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson to approve the deducted bid price of $7,842.78 to
Daniel Wuotila for project No. 92 -12B. Motion seconded by
Councilman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
M
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - MAY 20, 1992
5. CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL AND
SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 2, PROJECTS NO.
92 -02 AND 92 -09 (DEFERRED MAY 12, 1992)
Following discussion, Councilman Lenz moved to approve roll
preparation, to hold a public hearing on June 9, 1992 at 8:00
P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9715 and
No. 9716. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani-
mously carried.
6. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM MCLEOD COUNTY AGRICULTURAL
ASSOCIATION TO WAIVE REZONING FEE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Tor -
gerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously car-
ried, that the McLeod County Agricultural Association reim-
burse expenses.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned.
\J
u urscununuea issuing permits
❑ Merged with another system
❑ Split into two or more systems
❑ Annexed land areas
,
PLEASE COMPLETE AND MAIL
❑
Had other changes
THIS FORM ON OR BEFORE I JUNE 4• 1992
1 permits were issued during
Bureau of the Census
Instructions are included. For
eriod, mark (Xj in the box ❑
1201 East 10th Street
further assistance, cell collect
return this form
r
r Jeffersonville, IN 47132 -0001
13011763-7244.
NEW RESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLYOWNED
HOUSEKEEPING
Item
Number of
Number
of
BUILDINGS
Valuation of
Valuation of
No.
Buildings Housing
construction
Buildings
Housing
construction
units
Omit cents
units
Omit cents
(a)
(b) (cl
id)
let
III
191
Single-family houses, detached
Exclude mobile homes.
101
Single - family houses, attached
- Separated byground to roof wall,
-No units above or below, and
- Separate heating systems and utility meters.
(Count each unit as a separate building)
102
Two - family buildings
103
Three- and four - family buildings
104
Five -or -more family buildings
105
TOTAL — Sum of 101 —105 0-
1091
3
3
1 291,527
NEW RESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLYOWNED
NONHOUSEKEEPING
Item
Number of
Number of
BUILDINGS
Valuation of
Veluetionof
Buildings
Rooms
Buildings
Rooms
No.
construction
Omit cents
construction
Omit cents
la)
(bl
Ic)
Idl
let
If)
Ig)
H ,motels, and tourist cabins
(tr sient accommodations only)
213
Other nonhousekeeping shelter
214
NEW
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLYOWNED
NONRESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS
Item
Number
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
No,
of
construction
of
construction
buildings
Omit cents
buildings
Omit cents
(al
(bl
Ic)
(d)
lei
Amusement, social, and recreational
318
Churches and other religious
319
Industrial
320
Parking garages (buildings and open decked)
321
Service stations and repair garages
322
Hospitals and institutional
323
Offices, banks, and professional
324
Public works and utilities
325
Schools and other educational
326
Stores and customer services
327
Other nonresidential buildings
328
Struclures other than buildings
32g
ADDITIONS,
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
ALTERATIONS, AND
CONVERSIONS
Item
Number
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
No,
of
construction
of
construction
buildings
Omit cents
buildings
Omit cents
lei
lb)
fcl
dl
lei
R, ntial — Classify additions of
garages and car orts in item 438.
434
- '4ential and nonhousekeeping
437
- -- -lial garages and carports
/
cc: ached)
438
§
58 284
eerrreca c,..�
blUN-13, - s -
-
-
nr EASECAvrwnr
nu
YC'3, Tntdl Pettnitt 75 Tn }al Va L,a +inn •ioo err nn
DEMOLITIONS AND
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
Number of
Number of
RAZING OF
Item
Housing
Housing
BUILDINGS
No.
•
Buildings
units
Buildings
units
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
lei
Single- family houses (attached and detached)
645
Two - family buildings .
646
Three- and four - family buildings
647
Five-or -more family buildings
648
All other buildings and structures
649
INDIVIDUAL PERMITS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION VALUED AT $500,000 OR MORE
Please provide the following information for each permit authorizing construction valued at $500,000 or more
entered in sections I through IV.
Item
Number of
No.
Owner-
Valuation of
from
Description
Name and address of
owner or builder
ship
Mark (X)
construction
Housing
Buildings
sec.
one
Omit cents
units
I —IV
le)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
If)
I )
Kind of building
----------------- --------------------
❑Private
___ ________________________ ___ ____
Site address
___________________
E-1 Public
$
Kind of building
❑Private
Site address
--- - - - - --
❑ Public
$
Kind of [wilding
____ __________________ __ _____ ______
❑Private
---------------------------------
Site address
-
❑Public
$
Kind of building
-- -- - -- - ---
❑ Private
__ _____________________________ __
Sits address ---------------------___
❑Public
is
Kind of building
____ _______________________________
❑Private
Site address
____ _______________________________
El Public
$
Kind of building
- --- - - - ---
❑ Private
Site address
-
❑ Public
$
Kind of building
❑ Private
------------------------Si_______
Ste address
$
Kind of building
____ ____________________________ _ __
[]Private
--------------------------------------------------------------
Site address
13 Public
Kind of building
---- --
❑ Private
____------------------------
Sits address
______ -----
El Public
Comments
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/
• BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME
REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - April 21, 1992
BMNH Multipurpose Room - 5:30 p.m.
Present: Dori Johnson, President; Rich Myers, Vice President; Jim Mills,
Secretary; Elaine Black, Trustee; Rev. Thar Skeie, Trustee; Roger
Gilmer, Trustee; Mike Carla, Trustee; Marlin Torgerson, Trustee;
Dr. John Zenk, Chief of Medical Staff
Absent: None
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, CEO; Robert Koepcke, BMNH Administrator;
Karen Malmsten, Director of Finance; Jane Lien, Director of
Nursing Services; Jan Luthens, BMNH Director of Nursing; Elaine
Schermann, Director of Rehab /TQM; Linda Ziemer, Personnel
Director; Robyn Erickson, Director of Education and Marketing; Tim
Benoit, KDUZ Radio; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary
Prior to the meeting, orientation was held for former hospital board members
who presently serve on the board. A tour of the facility and an explanation
of services provided in each area were included. The group thanked Koepcke
and his staff for their efforts in providing the orientation and supper.
Following orientation, the meeting was called to order by President Johnson at
5:45 p.m.
Minutes of Past Meetings. Minutes of the March regular meeting the April 1
executive committee meeting were reviewed. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Mills, seconded by Torgerson, to approve the minutes
of the March 17 regular meeting of the board of directors and the
April 1 executive committee meeting as presented. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
Medical Staff Meetina Minutes. Dr. Zenk presented the minutes of the April
meeting of the HCH medical staff. The medical director of the Minnesota peer
review organization spoke to the group regarding their organization, processes
and goals for the future. In other discussions, it was noted that delinquent
records remain at a fairly low level (80 -81). Approval was given of a new
form for Rehab patients which will help streamline the process. The
environmental services committee approved the new infection control policy.
The remaining committees did not meet during the month. He told the board
members that the medical staff will be voting on chiropractor privileges next
month.
Zenk also gave a brief recap of the first meeting of the physician task force
for the merger of LifeSpan and Health One. The meeting took place last
Friday, where they learned the group will report directly to the LifeSpan
board, not just to a vice president. He relayed full consideration of rural
hospitals is being given in this merger, and two more meetings are coming up
for the group. It was noted that Health One doctors are fairly concerned
about the merger.
Old Business
A. Mammography Machine. Graves informed the board the hospital did not
sell the mammography machine discussed at the previous meeting. City
Attorney Barry Anderson was consulted as to whether this would be
proper, and he saw no restrictions on making such a gift. He did,
however, suggest the hospital pursue other legitimate purchasers before
donation, so Radiology staff are presently advertising the equipment.
�1 -74 - (2)
CRegular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/21/92
Page Two
New Business
A. Burns Hanor Protect. Koepcke led discussion on remodeling to be
completed at Burns Manor for compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act and in other areas as desired. Targeted for first
priority were the lower -level restrooms and the nearby hallway and
stairwells. A cost estimate of $35,500 was given for ADA compliance in
the stairwells, hallway and bathrooms. A second request for remodeling
in the Laundry, including new cupboards, cabinetry and floor, would cost
approximately $9100. Third priority were gutters and downspouts for the
east side of the building, which sometimes is flooded when heavy
rainfall is received. Another priority briefly discussed was
replacement of the current nurse call system.
He requested board approval on the lower -level restroom /hallway/
stairwell project. Fifty- thousand dollars is available from the Zeleny
trust for financing the project; however, Koepcke relayed he wished to
keep $10,000- 15,000 in the fund to comfortably manage purchase of the
tub needed on the west wing.
Much discussion ensued on which projects to undertake with the current
funds available. Suggestion was made to look at alternative financing
for some of the work, and a plan will be worked out for financing.
Following considerable discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Skeie, to authorize
( remodeling of the lower -level restroom /hallway /stairwell project
for compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA).
•
The projects were further discussed. Myers stated he thought the
laundry remodeling would hold more value in improving thF employees'
work environment. Carls asked if the laundry and the lower level
restrooms /stairwell /hallway could be done. Gilmer questioned whether
gutters ought to be done first to help alleviate water problems on that
side of the facility, and consensus was that this should be done to
prevent further damage the physical plant.
Following further discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Torgerson to amend the first
motion to include approval for remodeling of lower level
restrooms, nearby hallway and stairwell, and adding gutters and
downspouts on the east side of the building. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
Koepcke also circulated the resident list to board members for their
review, and information available from the new case mix computer was
discussed.
B. Health Insurance for Burns Manor. Ziemer presented a comparison of the
current hospital and nursing home health insurance plans. The
organization is considering different options as HCH's plan is up for
renewal in September of this year.
Of 130 BMNH employees, only 19 are enrolled in health plan now.
Personnel looked at BMNH potential enrollment compared to the percentage
of HCH employees enrolled. Cost estimates were based on BMNH employees
working 32 hours per week, 55% of those eligible employees taking •
single coverage, and 45% taking family coverage. Johnson asked why this
( Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/21/92
• Page Three
(B.) would be based on 32 hours at BMNH while HCH's eligibility is only 24
hours per week. Ziemer responded that affordability of enrolling a
number df people in this plan plays a factor; it will cost the
organization $189,000 for health insurance coverage at these rates, and
there is reluctance to take benefits away from employees. She relayed
that health coverage costs may be lowered by increasing the employee's
deductible to $200, versus the hospital's current $100 deductible, which
is considered "rich" for our marketplace. Graves relayed that LifeSpan
will provide some resources for creating a long -range plan for health
insurance coverage for the organization, and the plan will be brought
back to the board for approval when completed.
C. Endoscope Purchase. A capital expenditure request was presented from
Surgery to purchase an colonoscope for use in endoscopy procedures at
the hospital. Zenk spoke in favor of the purchase and noted the
advantages of the proposed colonoscope in performing an increasing
number of procedures. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Skeie, to approve
purchase of the proposed colonoscope at a cost of $12,400. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
D. Delay in Hospital Salary Increases. A recommendation to delay 1992
hospital salary increases for six months, made by Administration and
discussed with the officers of the board earlier in the month, was
presented for official approval. Minutes of the task force's meeting,
which highlighted the lower- than - expected hospital revenues for the
first quarter of 1992, were reviewed. It was noted that Burns Manor
employees will receive their salary increases on July 1, as planned,
with no delay. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Mills, to approve a six -
month delay in 1992 salary increases due to lower than expected
hospital revenues during the first three months of 1992. All were
in favor. Motion carried.
E.
First Ouarter Goals Status Report. Graves presented and discussed
progress made during first quarter toward achievement of 1992
operational goals. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Zenk, seconded by Skeie, to approve as
presented the first quarter report on 1992 operational goals. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
F.
Continuing Education Report by Roger Gilmer. Gilmer relayed that he was
unable to report at this time but would, instead, report to the board
regarding Oregon's health plan at the May meeting.
G.
Pharmacy Remodeling. Graves briefly described preliminary plans for
remodeling of the Pharmacy and Purchasing areas. It was agreed that the
board will tour these areas prior to the meeting next month and review
preliminary plans at that time.
H.
Other
1. BMNH Loan Interest. Gilmer and Graves reported on their recent
discussion with Mayor Paul Ackland regarding the $90,000 borrowed
by the nursing home prior to the merger from the City at 8%
Interest. The City Attorney and City's director of finance were
asked if they would remove the interest charges. They responded
(3�
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/21/92
Page Four •
(H) (1.) by asking that the HCH /BMNH board send a request to the City
Council to remove interest charges on that debt. A repayment plan
to pay back the loan from the City and pay back the approximate
$10,000 to the memorial fund (used to help finance the same
project) will be made. Mayor Ackland indicated a willingness to
do so in lieu of HCH funds used to pay for costs associated with
the merger. Malmsten will work with the City's finance director
regarding this.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to make a
request of the City Council for their forgiveness of past,
present and future interest on the $90,000 loan to Burns
Manor. All were in favor. Motion carried.
2. Visioning Workshov. Graves relayed that Myers is working with
HCH /BMNH to write a vision statement for the organization. There
is a need for two representatives from the board to join a group
of 12 members of the hospital and nursing home staff in this
process. Graves asked President Johnson and Vice President Myers
(who will succeed as president on July 1) to take part, and they
indicated their consent. It was noted that Dr. Zeak will already
take part in this process, along with another physician, as
representatives of the medical staff.
3. Resignation of BMNH Administrator. Graves announced to the group
( that Roepcke had submitted his resignation to pursue a career in
another profession. Roepcke told the board that the events of the
past year had forced him to take stock of his career at BMNH and
he determined he would prefer to pursue his first career, that of
journalism. President Johnson acknowledged his resignation on
behalf of the board and extended their friendship And best wishes
to him for his future endeavors. Mills expressed his personal
thanks to Roepcke for his work, first in overseeing the remodeling
of the nursing home and then following through with the merger
activities.
The process for filling the BMNH administrator position was
discussed. Advertising will take place over the next 30 days;
applications will then be reviewed, interviews scheduled, and a
candidate hired. Roepcke will continue to work with the HCH
Foundation and Burns Manor Memorial Fund to see the merger of
those groups through to completion.
4. LifeSpan Update. Myers gave a brief update on the LifeSpan and
Health one merger and relayed the merger is planned in two steps.
Step one will have LifeSpan becoming part of Abbott Northwestern
Hospital, Inc. Following the merger, Abbott Northwestern
Hospital, Inc., will merge with Health One and the LifeSpan board
members will become voting members of the new company's board.
Graves relayed that another offer of affiliation has been placed
on the table for HCH /BMNH to consider. This option would have
HCH /BMNH become an affiliate of Abbott Northwestern, similar to
the manner in which we are now affiliated with VHA. They have
presented the same offer to Cambridge and Morris, and Graves
` requested that a delegation from each board most in St. Cloud to
discuss the pros and cons. It was agreed that we need to •
understand all the alternatives open to us.
(4,)
1 Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/21/92
• Page Five
(H.) (4.) Consensus was to have the officers and upcoming officers meet with
Sprenger and other outstate affiliates and report back to the rest
of the board at the next meeting.
Accounts Payable. The listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements was
next presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Mille, seconded by Zenk, to approve for payment the
attached listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements in the
amount of $284,112.17. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Statistical Report. The report was presented. It was learned that average
length of stay was remarkably low for the month and contributed to the bottom
line. Percentage of occupancy was 38% for the month.
Nursing home statistics showed 11 admissions, compared to 8 for the previous
month. Average percentage of occupancy was 97.4 %. The case mix was 2.54.
Other hospital statistics showed an increase in surgery visits. It was noted
that the hospital had budgeted for cystograms being performed at HCH; since
those doctors now perform them in the Medical Center, this has caused a loss
of revenue and volumes for the hospital. Lab and Radiology volumes are
sporadic. Outpatient visits continued to increase and were at 9111 this year,
compared to 8365 for the previous year.
Financial Reports. The reports were presented. The combined balance showed
cash and short -term investments increased for the month. An increase in cash
position of $483,744 was attributed at both facilities due to a decrease in
accounts receivable. The combined YTD income statement showed March resulted
• in net loss of $6,019 for the combined facility, $81,496 behind budget.
The hospital's net income for March was $20,782, $14,459 over budget. Total
revenues were under budget. Discounts are also below budget dye to favorable
variances in length of stay. An examination of the expense budget
showed salaries were under budget because of deference of the salary increase
and not filling all requested positions. YTD benefits were under budget
because of one -time stop loss payment reimbursement. Benefits are within
budget. All other expenses are running close to or below budget.
BMNH's net income for the month was $10,814, $4,440 under budget.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. Minutes of the March auxiliary meeting was
presented. No unusual comments were made.
Adiournment. Motion was made by Skeie to adjourn the meeting. The meeting
then adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, \_ _
�
au ie Hulkonen � James F. Mills
Recording Secretary Secretary
LH
•
r5�
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
AND BURNS MANOR NURSING HC-ME
Income Statement for Periods Ended April 30, 1992 and 1991
YTC ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS BI:DGET
•
REVENUE 8 EXPENSE
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
NET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES.
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mince Contracts 8 Repairs
Food, Drugs S Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
REVENUE 6 EXPENSE
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
NET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mince Contracts & Repairs
Food, Drugs 8 Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
•
APRIL 92
%o}
AFFIL 92
%of Increase
Percent
Actual
Total
Bccget
Total (Decrease)
Variance
26.259
-6.20:
1.617,294
8028%
1.582.413
7,562.268
1CO.00 %
7.907.076
100.00: (344,8C8)
- 4.26°6
(1,533.812)
- 20.28%
('.563.448)
- 21.04 %s 129.636
-7.75%
6,028,456
79.72%
6.243,"029
78.96% (215.172)
- 3.15'.6
2948,578
38.99%
3,093.351
39.12% (144,773)
-4.68%
611,167
8.C8 %
638.702
8.08% (27,535)
-4.91%
224,710
2.97;.
227,745
2.88% (3,035)
-1.33%
275,878
3.65%
261,114
3.3C% 14,764
5.E5%
221.637
2.93%
249,534
3.16% (27,897)
- 11.18%
903,980
11.95%
851,435
10.77% 52,545
6.17 °6
165,921
2.19:
216,293
2.74% (50,372)
- 23,29%
380,302
5.03%
352.840
4.46: 27,462
7.781,
261,039
3.45;.
293,736
3-71% (32.698)
- 11.13%
&993.212
79.25%
6.1 e4.750
78.22% (191,538)
-3.10%
35,244
0.47%
58,878
0.74% (23,633)
- 40.14%
29,355
039%
72.945
0.92% (43.530)
-597'6 %
64,600
0.85:
131,823
1.67% (67.223)
14,272
MONTHLY Analysis
APRIL 92 %of APRIL 92 %of Increase Percent
Actual Total Budget Total (Decrease) Varance
2.014,543
1100.00%
2.005.920
100.00;.
8.623
0.43%
(397,248)
- 19.72%
(423.507)
- 21.11%
26.259
-6.20:
1.617,294
8028%
1.582.413
78.89:
34.881
2.2C%
739,034
36.668%
780.073
38.89;'.
(41,039)
-5.26%
162.571
8.07%
160.377
8.00 %.
2.194
1.37%
52.657
2.661%
49,551
2.47%
3.106
6.27%
73,822
3.66%
66.144
3.30%
7,678
11.6'%
54.647
271%
62.388
3.il%
(7,741)
- 12.41%
254,211
1262%.
216,743
10.81%
37,466
1729%
36,845
1_83%
47.676
238%
(10.831)
- 22,72%
97,782
4.85%
68,210
4.40%
9.572
10.85%
75.046
3.73%
73.434
3.66%
1,612
2.19:
1,546.814
76.77%
'.544.596
77.00 %.
2.018
0.13%
70.680
3.51:
37.817
1,89%
32.863
86.90%
(62)
-0.00%
18.529
0.92%
(18.591)
- 100.33%
70,618
3.51%
56,346
281 %
14,272
25.33%
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
Income Statement for Periods Ended April 30, 1992 and 1991
REVENUE 3 EXPENSE
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
NET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts & Repairs
Food, Drugs & Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
YTD ANALYSIS - ACTUALVERSUS BUDGET
APRIL 92
%of
APRIL 92
%of
Increase
Pero
Actual
Total
Budget
Total
(Decrease)
Vanance
5.27;.
311,672
3.71%
272.012
76.78%
5.120,957
6,451,475
100.00%
6,807,510
100.00%
(356,035)
- 5.23%
(1,497,208)
-23.21%
(1,658,481)
- 24.36%
161,273
-9.72%
4,954,268
76.79%
5,149,029
75.64% (194,761)
-3.78%
2,350,140
487,989
174,579
275,878
183,414
753,030
148,698
340,004
239,535
4,953,266
1,001
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 19,203
NET INCOME (LOSS)
.REVENUE & EXPENSE
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
NET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts 8 Repairs
Food, Drugs & Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
36.43% 2,481,077
7.56%
489,448
2.71%
182,080
4.28%
261,114
2.84:
207,150
11.67%
720,046
2.30%
196,358
5.27;.
311,672
3.71%
272.012
76.78%
5.120,957
0.02%
28,072
0.30% 68,613
20.205 0.31% 96,685
36.45%
(130,937)
-5.28%
7.19%
(1,459)
-0.30%
2.67%
(7,501)
-4.12%
184%
14,764
5.65%
3.04%
(23,736)
- 11.46%
10.58%
32,984
4.58%
2.88%
(47,660)
- 24.27%
4.58%
28,332
9.09%
4.00%
(32,478)
- 11.94%
75.23% (167,691)
-3.27%
0.41%
(27,070)
- 96.43%
1.01% (49,410) - 72.01%
1.42% _ (76,480) - 79.10%
YTD ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL
APRIL 92 %of APRIL 91 %of Increase Per
Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Van
6,451,475
(1.497,208)
4,954,268
2,350,140
487,989
174,579
275,878
183,414
753,030
148,698
340,004
239,535
4.953, 266
001
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 19,203
100.00% 5,603,699
- 23.21% (1,089,039)
76.79% 4,514,660
36.43%
2,134,804
7.56%
421,987
2.71%
186,892
4.28%
299,934
2.84%
143,669
11.67%
695,261
2.30%
212.631
5.27%
155,754
3.71%
51,261
76.78%
4,302,193
0.02%
212.467
0.30% 84,324
NET INCOME (LOSS) 20,205 0.31% 296.791
100.00% 847,776
-19.43% (408.169)
80.57% 439,608
38.10%
215,336
7.53%
66,002
3.34%
(12,313)
5.35%
(24,056)
256%
39.745
12.41%
57,769
3.79%
(63,933)
278%
184,250
0.91%
188,274
76.77%
651.073
3.79%
(211,466)
1.50% (65,121)
5.30% (276 5861
15.13%
37.48%
9.74%
10.09%
15.64%
-6 59%
-8 02%
27.66%
8.31%
- 30.07%
118.30%
367.28%
15.13%
- 99.53%
- 77.23%
- 93.19%
0
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
1P
income Statement for Periods Ended April 30, 1992 and 1991
1,476.727
TOTAL REVENUE
256,255
MONTHLY ANALYSIS
- ACTUAL
VERSUS BUDGET
(279,526)
OPERATING EXPENSES:
(107,398)
•
1,346,058
S en etRs
1,197,201
Professional Fees
148,857
12.43:<
590,596
APRIL 92
%df
APRIL 92
%of
Increase
Percent
7.70%
Actual
Total
Budget
Total
(Decrease)
Varlance
REVENUE & EXPENSE
3.41%
(9,609)
- 19.08%
73,822
4.26%
68,867
TOTAL REVENUE
1,732,982
100.00%
1,733,300
100.00%
(318)
-0.02%
Discounts
(386,924)
- 22.33%
(422,276)
- 24.36%
35.352
-8.37%
NET OPERATING REVENUE
1,346,058
77.67%
1,311,024
75.64%
35,034
2.67%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
5.04%
39,091
265%
48,232
123.38%
69,673
Salaries
590,596
34.08%
623.831
35.99%
(33,235)
- 5.33%
Benefits
133.520
7.70%
123.063
7.10%
10,457
8.50%
Professional Fees
40,754
2.35%
38,135
2.20%
2,619
6,87%
Medical Fees
73,822
4.26%
66,144
3.82%
7,678
11.61%
Utilities, Mince Contracts & Repairs 45,372
2.62:
51,792
299%
(6,420)
- 12.39%
Food, Drugs & Supplies
217,132
12.53%
183,683
10.60%
33,449
18.21%
Other Expenses
33,582
1.94%
44.342
256%
(10,760)
- 24.27%
Depreciation
87,323
5.04%
77,918
4.50%
9,405
12.07%
Interest
69,673
4.02%
68,003
3.92%
1,670
2.46%
Total Operating Expense
1,291,775
74.54%
1,276,911
73.67%
14,864
1.16%
OPERATING MARGIN
54,283
3.13%
34,113
1.97%
20,170
59.13%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) (1,518)
-0.09%
17,446
1.01%
(18,964)
- 108.70%
NET INCOME (LOSS)
52,766
104%
51,559
2.97%
1,207
2.34%
1P
REVENUE & EXPENSE
1,476.727
TOTAL REVENUE
256,255
Discounts
(386,924)
NET OPERATING REVENUE
(279,526)
OPERATING EXPENSES:
(107,398)
Salaries
1,346,058
S en etRs
1,197,201
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mince Contracts & Repairs
Food, Drugs & Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
MONTHLY ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS PRIOR YEAR ACTUAL
APRIL 92 %of APRIL 91 %of Increase Percent
Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Variance
1,732,982
100.00%
1,476.727
100.00%
256,255
17.35%
(386,924)
- 22.33%
(279,526)
- 18.93%
(107,398)
38.42%
1,346,058
77.67%
1,197,201
81.07%
148,857
12.43:<
590,596
34.08%
536,397
36.32%
54,199
10.10%
133,520
7.70%
109.101
7.39%
24,419
22.38%
40,754
2.35%
50,363
3.41%
(9,609)
- 19.08%
73,822
4.26%
68,867
4.66%
4,955
7.19%
45,372
2.62%
31,666
2.14%
13,706
43.28%
217,132
1253%
192,445
13.03%
24,687
12.83%
33,582
1.94%
68,567
4.64%
(34,985)
- 51.02%
87,323
5.04%
39,091
265%
48,232
123.38%
69,673
4.02%
12.987
0.88%
56.686
436.48%
1,291.775
74.54%
1,109.484
75.13%
182.291
16.43%
54,283
3.13%
87,717
5.94%
(33,434)
- 38.12%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) (1.518)
-0.26% 14,591
NET INCOME (LOSS) 52766 3.04% 102,308
•
272% (16.109) - 110.40%
6.93% (49,542) - 48.42%
BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME
lr=me Statemem for Periods Ended April 30, 1992 and 1991
REVENUE S EXPENSE
TOTALREVENUE
Discounts
NET OPE.RATINGREVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts & Repairs
Food, Drugs & Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
REVENUE & EXPENSE
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
NET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities. Mtnce Contracts S Repairs
Food, Drugs & Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (LOSS)
YTD ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VEaSUS BUDGET
APRIL 92 %cf APRIL92 %of Increase
Actual Total Budget Total (Decrease
1,110,793
(36.604)
1,074.189
598,438
123,178
50,131
0
38,223
150.950
17,223
40,298
21.504
1,039.946
34,243
10.152
4_.395
100,00:'. 1,099,566
- 3.30;. (4.967)
96.70% 1,094,599
53.87%
612.274
11.09%
149,254
4,51%
45.665
0.00%
0
3.=4%
42.384
13.59%
131,389
1.55%
19,935
3.53%
41,168
1.94%
21.724
93. 62%
1,063.793
3.C8%
30,806
0.91% 4,332
4.00% 35.138
MONTHLY ANALYSIS - ACTUAL VERSUS BUDGE
100.007. 11,227
-0.45% (31,637)
99.55% (20.410)
55.68%
(13,836)
13.57:.
(26,076)
4.15%
4,466
O.DO%
0
3.85%
(4,161)
11.95:
19,561
1.81:
(2712)
3.74%
(870)
1.98:
(220)
96.75%
(23.847)
2.80%
3,437
0.39°6 5,820
120% 9 257
1.02 e
636.95':
- 225%
- 17.47%
9.78%
ERR
-9 82` o
14.89%
-13.61 %
- 2.11%
-1.01%
-2.24%
11.16%
134,35%
25.35'6
APRIL 92 %of APRIL 92 %df Increase Percem
Actual Tom Budget Total (Decease) Va ance
281,561
100.00%
272620
100.00% 8,941
128%
(10.324)
-3.67% (1.231)
- 0.45% (9.093)
738.701%
271.236
96.33%
271.389
99.55% (153)
-0 -06%
148.437
5272✓.
156.242
57.31% (7,805)
- 5.00;.
29,050
10.32%
37,314
13.69% (8,264)
- 22.15:
11,903
423%
11,416
4.19". 487
4.27%
0
0.00%
0
0.00% 0
ERR
9,274
3.29%
10.596
3.89% (1,322)
- 12.47%
37,079
13.177.
33,060
1213% 4,019
12.16%
3263
1.16%
1334
1.221. (71)
-212 e
10,458
3.715
10.292
3.78% 166
1.62%
5.373
1.91%
5.431
1.99% (58)
- 1.07%
254.839
90.51%
267.685
98.19% (12846)
-4.80:
16.397
5.82%
3.704
1.36% 12.693
342.687.
1,456
0.52%
1.083
0.40% 373
34.43%
17.853
6.34%
4,787
1.76% 73,066
272.947.
11
• MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Board
April 29, 1992
Members present were Lee Cox; chairman, Mike Schell, Mike Cannon and Linda
Martin. Also present were Dolf Moon and Karen McKay.
The meeting was called to order at 5:25 p.m.
The minutes dated March 25, 1992 were approved by a motion made by Mike Schell
and seconded by Mike Cannon. The board unanimously agreed.
OLD BUSINESS
Popcorn Wagon - A memo will be presented to the City Council outlining the
details of the agreement with MainStreet regarding the popcorn wagon in Library
Square.
MainStreet will be responsible for (1) working with the Parks & Recreation
Director in regards to the site preparation and location of the wagon, (2)
MainStreet will dedicate 11% of the revenues to "public good ", (3) working
with the Ambassadors in conjunction with the Annual Arts & Crafts Show in the
fall.
Ciu r Registration_ - Registration for summer programs begins Tuesday, May 5th
from 6 -8 p.m. Board members will be present to assist.
Budget Cuts - All the recent budget cuts proposed for 1992 will be rescinded.
To help offset the deficit in the State Budget, cities will be paying sales tax
beginning June 1st.
Tree Planting Update - 455 trees were planted this spring. A Sentence To Serve
crew planted 277 trees. Jerry Brown planted 165, and due to construction along
Adams Street, 30 trees scheduled to be planted there, were moved into Elks Park.
Public Sites - Dolf, along with Jim Marka; Building Inspector, presented the
updated Public Sites Agreement to the City Council. One area was cleared up in
section "F" the city will require 24 unit and larger dwellings to provide a tot
lot. Also in section 8.07 the minimum cash standard was raised, while land
contribution stayed the same. The Parks and Recreation Board will be involved
in the decision process. The Ordinance will be read at two regular council
meetings, and then adopted.
NEW BUSINESS
Water Carnival - The Jaycees have requested permits for their Annual Dance and
Parade. They would like to set up the carnival midway rides in the grassy area
in Masonic /West River Park providing the weather cooperates. Dolf will meet
with representatives from the Jaycees and the amusement company to determine
the site. The city can provide a gravel pad for the equipment if wet
conditions develop.
MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Board
April 29, 1992
Page two
Mike Schall made a motion to allow the Jaycees to set up the midway rides in
the grassy area of Masonic /West River Park at the discretion of the Parks and
Recreation Director, based on weather conditions. Linda Martin seconded the
motion, and the board unanimously agreed.
Playground Eguipment - The Masons have committed a donation of $2,000 /year for
the maintenance and improvement of Masonic/West River Park. Datlof Wesloh has
issued a $3,300 check and a playground unit has been ordered for placement in
the grassy area near the Kouba Point Shelter. Delivery of the equipment is
scheduled for May 31st. Dolf will have the unit installed as soon as possible.
The Mason's revenues are derived from the sale of their building, they now rent
space.
Roberts Park is scheduled to get replacement playground equipment in 1992 along
with site preparation and A.D.A. accessibility, the project will cost
approximately $20,000. Free standing equipment will be installed due the
unstable ground in the park.
The board questioned spending such a large amount of money in one location
when other park areas still have no equipment. Dolf reminded the board that
this equipment is a replacement. With the park dedication funds available for
park improvements, other areas will be considered. The Board feels there is an •
adequate number of parks. Dolf and Jim Marka feel that parks should be a
minimum of four acres.
Tree Planting - City residents had the opportunity to pay the difference for
larger boulevard trees. The Tree Board approved those plantings.
Adjournment - Mike Cannon made a motion to ajourn the meeting at 6:21 p.m.
Mike Schall seconded the motion, and the board unanimously agreed.
klm
0
• MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, April 21, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at
7 :40 p.m. with the following members present, E1Roy Dobratz,
Roland Ebent, Dean Wood (7,40 p.m.), Tom Lyke (7,55 p.m.) and
Chairman Gruett Members Absent, Craig Lenz and Bill Craig Also
Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator, and John Rodeberg, City
Engineer
2. MINUTES
Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Tuesday, March 17, 1992, and the Special Meeting
dated Tuesday, March 24, 1992. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR MINI - STORAGE
• Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7:41 p.m. with
the reading of publication #4328 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, December 5, 1991. The
request is for the purpose of considering a request to
construct commercial and mini storage located on Hwy 15
North.
After discussion of the history of the request, Hr. Wood
moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the
hearing closed at 7,43 p.m. Hr. Wood made a motion to
reject the request due to insufficient information to
make a decision, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion
carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REQUESTED BY RICHARD SMITH ON ROBERTS RD
Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7:44 p.m, with
the reading of publication #4335 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday,January 9, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a request for
• conditional use permit to allow for the construction of
• duplex in an R -1 District.
• After discussion of the request explaining the history of
the property, Hr. Dobratz moved to close the hearing,
1
4 -A(4t )
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1992
seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr.
Ebent made a motion to deny the request due to lack of
sufficient information as requested by the planning
commission, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY
EASEMENT REQUESTED BY RICHARD SMITH IN STONEY POINT 3RD
ADDITION
Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7145 p.m. with
the reading of publication 5433 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 9, 1992 and
Tuesday, January 14, 1992. The request is for the
purpose of considering a petition by the owner to vacate
a utility easement located in Stoney Point 3rd Addition.
After discussion, Mr. Dobratz moved to close the hearing,
seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed at 7,47 p.m. Mr.
Wood moved to deny the request due to the fact the
project is not moving forward at this time, seconded by
Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
•
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT •
REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAR WASH ON
HWY 7 WEST
Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 4 :47 p.m. with
the reading of publication 54350 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 5, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a request to
construct a carwash located at 1385 Hwy 7 West.
City Administrator commented on the history of the
request and the lack of information still needed to make
a decision by staff.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Wood the hearing closed at 7:50 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a
motion to deny the request due to lack of sufficient
information to make a decision by planning commission,
seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF 1ST
ADDITION TO PETERSON TERRACE SUBMITTED BY REDMAN REAL
ESTATE
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7 :51 p.m. with the
reading of publication 54360 as published in the •
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 9, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary
and final plat to be known as "First Addition to
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1992
0 Peterson's Terrace ".
City Administrator Plotz explained the request the staff
recommendation noting that lot 3 in buildable. A
subdivision agreement regarding future assessments is to
be submitted to City Council.
Ms. June Redman commented on Lot 3 and the use of lot 3,
she stated that property owners of the 3 lots will split
the assessments on 6th Ave.
Discussion followed on the subdivision or development
agreement. City Engineer Rodeberg stated the city
requires a binding legal document for assessments. There
was discussion of access to Lot 3.
Mr. Rod Saar, neighboring property owner, commented on
the maintenance remaining as presently agreed upon.
Discussion also followed as to the easement being 12' not
6'.
City Administrator Plotz noted correspondence from the
Hutch Utilities stating gas service is to be removed form
• present house on Lot 3 at the developer's expense. Over
head facilities to remain in place until placed
underground and relocated at a future date.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Wood the hearing closed at 8,05 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a
motion to approve the preliminary and final plat provided
staff concerns are addressed and a subdivision agreement
is prepared prior to the City Council meeting also, the
Utility concerns are to be addressed, seconded by Mr.
Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GOLF VIEW
SUBDIVISION SUBMITTED BY KEVIN COMPTON
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8106 p.m. with the
reading of publication 84362 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 9, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary
plat to be known as "Golf View Subdivision ".
City Engineer Rodeberg presented a revised preliminary
plat, and commented on the staff recommendations being
addressed on the revised plat. He stated the PUD is no
longer in effect. The plat meets all requirements and a
subdivision agreement Is required by the city.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1992
Mr. Heirs, 1209 Fairway Ave, questioned the lapsing of a •
PUD. Hr. Don Erickson, Hometown Realty, explained the
PUD and the ownership of the property. City
Administrator Plotz commented on the ordinance and the
requirements. Hr. Rodeberg explained the previous
developer has on financial interest in the property.
Mr. Heirs commented on drainage and storm sewer. Mr.
Rodeberg explained the cul de sac and the fact the
developer will add storm sewer.
Mr. Plotz commented on the parkland dedication by Mr.
Helland.
Hr. Wood moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke
the hearing closed at 8:30 p.m. Hr. Ebent made a motion
to approve the preliminary plat provided staff
recommendations are met and the City Attorney address the
concerns of the PUD, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion
carried unanimously.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY SKIP •
QUADE, ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
Hr. Plotz read correspondence from Acoma Township
regarding the plat. He also noted the staff
recommendations. Mr. Rodeberg commented on the city
concerns of urban development in rural setting and future
city services. He also stated fire protection is a
concern with the large development.
Mr. Quade commented on the staff recommendations and
stated the concerns of the city were also concerns of the
county. He stated these concerns have been met. Mr.
Quade commented on the discussion with the county on the
road. He stated only State certified contractors will be
hired to put in the sewage septic tank systems.
Discussion followed on the township recommendation of
1000' from the high water mark.
City Engineer Rodeberg explained the city may have a
recommendation to the county but on legal authority.
Dr. Kleinkauf commented on concerns of drainage in the
area. Discussion followed on the drainage. Hr. Rodeberg
commented on the Shoreland Protection Ordinance and the
4
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1992
• State requirements. He also commented on the complete
plat being presented even if the plat is developed
slowly.
Mr. Ebent moved to recommend denial of the project to
City Council based on staff recommendations and concerns,
seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT,
ACOMA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
Mr. Dan Huebert explained the new proposal and the County
requesting a full plat. Mr. Huebert would like approval
for one lot only.
Mr. Ebent moved to pass on to City Council with no
objection, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried
unanimously.
OTHER NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR FEEDLOT IN 2
is MILE RADIUS
City Engineer Rodeberg explained the feed lot request
being adjacent to the city. There was discussion on the
present comprehensive plan and the fact this use is not
appropriate for the area.
•
Mr. Lyke moved to recommend denial as it is not an
appropriate use in the area seconded by Mr. Dobratz the
motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MOVING MOBILE
HOME ONTO PROPERTY PARENTS OWN, 2 MILE RADIUS
Mr. Lyke moved to recommend no objection to the request,
seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION TO REZONE FROM AGRICULTURE TO RESIDENTIAL
REQUESTED BY SKIP QUADS, 2 MILE RADIUS
Discussion followed on rezoning at such time the city
annexes the area to be served. Mr. Wood recommended the
request for rezoning be denied because of the concerns
brought forth in denial of the plat, seconded by Mr.
Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 21, 1992 •
(d) CONSIDERATION OF EXTENSION OF VARIANCE FOR CEDAR CREST
REQUESTED BY HENRY EWALD
Mr. Wood moved to recommend approval of the extension for
6 months, future requests must be brought back to
planning commission, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion
carried unanimously.
5. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
10:15 p.m.
•
\J
;a
•
•
I
RETAIL "ON SALE"
'state of Allnenta, i lU 0 - n vi
cooxrr or .l'I `4v __ _ j _� r✓ _ .v ✓ - --
To the... .......... ..... —Of the ,_...... c/ TV.................. ........
...... . ........ ........ .......... .............. .................................. ..... State of Minnesota:
. - --
hereby apps - ___Derr a license for the term oJ_— . ------
�l!9�.' %ors
8'T
from the day oJ......—_—
At Retail Only, Non-Intoxicating Malt Liquors,
as the same are defined by law, for coryumptbn "Ox" thaw metal^ prmL a in
'.sure il"kl
duoribrd as follows. to wu W-- ..._._._._.__._.__ ...__
574. ID
V4-74= /114.15 /l7rlerva,14,4 %n2K
at which Plans mid aPDLiwnt._cPernla ._the bwirs<se of_.f^.CL!L4 =.ti v��Ce✓.._.- :T._5�. —_ .
and to that end reprceent..... and Rats - -aa JoIlows: That raid appl icant...._. ...__._(.5..____......._silinrn of the United States; of good moral thane!,,
and repute: and ha _,.nttairwd the ago of ll yeah; that....._.._ ........_. _- ..___...._..__. _._ prprietcr.__if the
artablishme^t for which the license will be laraed if this application is granted.
That no manwfaetwer of such non- incaeicating -all liquor hat any ownership, in u hole or impart,
L% said business of mid applicant._. or any interest therein;
That raid applicant _ _..make ....thin application pursuant and subject to all the laws of the State of
Minnesota and the ordinances and regulations of mid. —G'GL✓ __...___._
applicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby agrm.ob" roe and obey the same;
lac. a -•- war nrmn.uu a.o. M I,d AWar.l
Recommend approval with restrictions and require is i p st.
No beer allowed to be brought into bleacher or 1 ark ea r outside.
Drivers license I.O. to be required for purchase
Beer not to be consumed off ball park area. ^
iceven maase
Police Chief
Each applicant further states that —he is not now the holder of, we has --he made application for,
nur does —he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
t _
Dated _44a7 1191 1z.:XrL�t. m?"' - - - --
P. 0. dddrees
dppliaant _
•
•
•
23456
JUN 1992
RECEIVED N
w
Hutchinson City Council;
June 3, 1992
Bethlehem United Methodist Church requests permission
to use Library Square and the band shelter for a community
worship service on Sunday, August 23 at 9:30 a.m.
We would require electrical power in the band shelter
and would be setting up folding chairs or lawn chairs in the
park for the service.
We understand there is no fee associated with the use
of this facility. If there is a fee, please inform.
Thank -you for your consideration. Correspondence and
questions may be directed to:
Emma Melin Pastor Harold Biederman
1055 Sherwood St. Bethlehem United Methodist Church
Hutchinson, MN or 665 Miller Ave.
Hutchinson, MN
234 -1614 Days
587 -5513 Evenings 587 -3312
Sincerely;;WL
Emma Melin
(worship chair
Ld.Mi
Harold Biederman
(pastor)
PUBLICATION NO. 4383
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 276
LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NOS. 92 -02 & 92 -09
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on the
9th day of June, 1992, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson,
Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of:
Proj. No. 92 -02 First Avenue N.W., Second Avenue N.W., Cedar Avenue,
Franklin Street from Washington Avenue to Second Avenue
N.W. and Glen Street from Washington Avenue to Cedar
Avenue by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading,
gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and
Proj. No. 92 -09 Alley East of Main Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to
Sixth Avenue S.E. by the construction of storm sewer,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
• You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County
Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the
date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the
entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1992. You may, at anytime thereafter,
pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment
is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be
charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to
prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will
apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall
be until October 1st, 1992.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
$158,798.12. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No
appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written
objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented
to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice,
consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it
deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the
following procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who
may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the
introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified,
the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This
5A.
PUBLICATION NO. 4383
PAGE 2
0
procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has
further questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector
may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector
desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's
witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied;
however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as
to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the
Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may
make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence
and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and •
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service
upon the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in
its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it
would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special
assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in
that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due.
Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the
resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the confirmation of the
assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such
deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property.
Gary D. P1 z,, C�dministrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, MAY 26TH, 1992 AND TUESDAY, JUNE
2ND, 1992.
•
A S SESSMEN T HEA R SNG
1st Ave NW /2nd Ave NW /Cedar Ave /Franklin St /Glen St
Alley East of Main Street from 5th Ave SE to 6th Ave SE
Project No. 92 -02 /Project No. 92 -09
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 276
June 9, 1992 - 8:00 pm
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, SERVICES, STORM SEWER, GRADING, CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER, GRAVEL BASE, BITUMINOUS BASE, SURFACING AND APPURTENANCES
Total Construction Cost S 526,979.80
Proiect Expenses $ 115,935.56
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 642,915.36
PROJECT COST
BREAKDOWN
City Cost (92 -02)
Sanitary Sewer Replacement
$
46,202.91
Watermain Replacement
$
38,896.09
Trunk Storm Sewer
$
75,870.09
Sidewalk Removal & Replacement
$
26,425.81
including restoration
Parking Lot
$
31,470.88
Extra width /depth of street,
Sideyard /Previously Assessed
$
244,751.56
City Owned lots
$
20,499.90
Deferred Assessments
$
2,161.86
TOTAL CITY COST (92 -02) $ 486,281.10
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST (92 -02) S 131,264.91
TOTAL PROJECT COST (92 -02) $ 617,544.01
TOTAL CITY COST (92 -09) $ 0.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST (92 -09) S 25,371.35
TOTAL PROJECT COST (92 -09) $ 25,371.35
ASSESSMENT RATES (92 -02
Sanitary Sewer Service S 526.15 /Service
Watermain Service S 503.95 /Service
Street Cost (Residential) S 39.45 /Front Foot
Street Cost (Commercial) S 47.34 /Front Foot
Driveway (Residential) S 28.06 /Square Yard
Driveway (Commercial) S 31.72 /Square Yard
ASSESSMENT RATES (92 -09)
Alley and Storm Sewer (Option 1) $ 14.63 /Front Foos:
Alley and Storm Sewer (Option 2) S 10.89 /Front Foot
PAYMENT OPTIONS
► Full Payment without Interest by October 1, 1992
► Full Payment with Interest from October 1st by November 15, 1992
!.► After November 15, 1992 Assessments are certified to tax rolls
► Assessment on Tax Roll, 10 Years With Interest, Equal Principal
► Deferment available for property owners, meeting income guidelines,
who are either over 65 years old or disabled.
Al
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 276
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT NO. 92 -02 & 92 -09
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of:
Project No. 92 -02 First Avenue N.W., Second Avenue N.W., Cedar Avenue,
Franklin Street from Washington Avenue to Second Avenue
N.W. and Glen Street from Washington Avenue to Cedar
Avenue by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading,
gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances;and
Project No. 92 -09 Alley East of Main Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to
Sixth Avenue S.E. by the construction of storm sewer,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is
hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on
or before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate
of _ percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment
resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from October 1st, 1992, until the 31st day of December, 1993. To each
subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the
City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment
is paid by the 1st day of October, 1992; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay
to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment
• is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be
charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year.
RESOUNION 00.
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 276
LETTDIG NO. 2
PROJECT NOS. 92 -02 & 92 -09
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists
of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
u
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.
SRESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT NO. 92 -02 & 92 -09
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of:
Project No. 92 -02 First Avenue N.W., Second Avenue N.W., Cedar Avenue,
Franklin Street from Washington Avenue to Second Avenue
N.W. and Glen Street from Washington Avenue to Cedar
Avenue by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading,
gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -09 Alley East of Main Street from Fifth Avenue S.E. to
Sixth Avenue S.E. by the construction of storm sewer,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances;
and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following
bids were received complying with the advertisement:
AMOUNT BID
Duininck Bros., Inc., Prinsburg, MN $ 526,979.80
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc., Hamburg, HN S 538,891.92
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Duininck Bros., Inc., Hamburg, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract with Duininck Bros., inc. of Hamburg, Minnesota,
in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein,
according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved by the City Council
and on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall
be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract.
_3
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
• Mayor
City Administrator
V A
Z7OCi1l��lVT 00500
CONTRACT AGl2EF.1��11T'Z' FOR1�f
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 9th day of June, 1992, by and between Duininck i
Bros., Inc. of Prinsburg, Minnesota, hereinafter called the Contractor, and the
City of Hutchinson, a Municipal Corporation in the County of McLeod, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter called the Municipality.
WITNESSETH, that the Contractor and the Municipality for the consideration
hereinafter named agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1. The Contractor agrees to provide all materials, equipment and
labor necessary for the complete construction of all the work shown on the
drawings and described in the specifications prepared by the Municipality for
LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NOS. 92 -02 & 92 -09 and to do everything in strict
conformity with said specifications and drawings.
ARTICLE 2. The Contractor agrees that the work contemplated by this
contract shall be entirely completed on or before October 16th, 1992.
ARTICLE 3. The Municipality agrees to pay the Contractor in current funds
for the performance of this Contract the sum of Five Hundred Twenty -Six Thousand,
Nine Hundred Seventy -Nine Dollars and 80 /100 ($526,979.80) subject to additions
and deductions as provided for in the specifications and to make payments on
account of the Contract as provided for in the specifications, except as
hereinafter stated:
ARTICLE 4. The Contractor and the Municipality agree that the
specifications and the drawings, together with this agreement, form the Contract
and that such specifications and drawings are as fully a part of the Contract as
if attached or herein repeated. The Contractor and the Municipality agree that
the attached Table of Contents (Document No. 00002) is a complete list of all
specifications and drawings to be part of the Contract.
The Contractor and the Municipality, for themselves, their
successors, executors, administrators and assigns, hereby agree to the full
performance of the covenants herein contained.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused these presents to
be signed in their behalf by the proper officers thereunto duly authorized and
their corporate seal to be hereto affixed, the day and year first above written.
In the presence of: CONTRACTOR:
In the presence of:
By:
Its:
MUNICIPALITY - CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HAYORs
CLERK I
00500 -1
•
u
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrato
FROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Polic
DATE: June 2, 1992
RE: Police Records Management seminar
This memorandum will serve as a request to send police department
secretary Lisa Grina to a police records management seminar to be
conducted in Lansing, Illinois, August 5 -7, 1992.
I have attached the syllabus for this seminar. As you can see from
the syllabus this program would pertain directly to small and
medium size agencies with manual records systems. Although we have
some computerization of records this department still utilizes a
manual system for the filing of reports and perpetrator records.
I believe that this seminar would enhance Ms. Grina's ability to
analyze and update the current records system. This is a priority
issue for this department as I believe our records system is
• archaic and needs to be updated with current trends and
technologies. Additionally, we are finding that our records
retention practices may be less than adequate. This seminar should
assist in determining the necessary records retention practices.
The cost for the seminar is $340.00 plus the cost of lodging and
transportation. I would estimate that the total cost for this
seminar would be $750.00.
I would request that this item be placed on the council agenda for
the city council approval so that we may move forth with the
necessary registration eservations.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum,
please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.
/lkg
92 -02 -0015
•
6 -7� '
identih, life -span and maintenance consid-
erations for the facility.
August 17 -21, 1992; Cincinnati, OH;
Hosted by the Cincinnati Police Department
IACP Member $525, Nonmember $585
Foiice inielligence Operatic.:=
and Management*
Maintenance of an aggressive and sensi-
tive intelligence- gathering capability is
essential if police agencies are to maintain
up -to -date knowledge of criminal activity
and assume a proactive approach to crime
prevention. This is a highly specialized
function that requires training in analytical
and evaluative methods, prioritization, and
privacy and security considerations.
At the conclusion of this program, super.
visors, commanders and those responsible
for the police intelligence function will be
able to identify intelligence sources; analyze
intelligence data; create accurate forecasts
and intelligence reports; and organize,
manage and evaluate the police intelligence
function.
July 13 -15, 1992;
Cheyenne, WY, Hosted
by the Laramie County
Sheriff's Department
LACPMember$340,
Nonmember $400
Police Planning,
Research and
Implementation
Planning and re-
search are important
law enforcement man-
agement functions,
with the evaluation of
existing programs,
operations and the
assessment of equip-
ment being key
responsibilities that
aid in informed deci-
sion making. As a
result, it is essential
that planning and
research officers be
conduct a research project; design and
analyze a survey List; use basic statistics and
graphics and hst their application in plan-
ning and research; work with scheduling
techniques; use automation for planning
and make effective presentations.
August 10- 12,1992; Coronado, G4 Hosted
by the Coronado Police Department
L4CP Member $360, Nonmember $420
Foiice Records Management
One of the most important support
functions in a law enforcement agency is
records management. The reliability of
management and operational decision
making is dependent upon accurate, timely
and accessible information. This course will
provide commanders, supervisors and those
responsible for the management of police
records with a foundation for enhancing an
agency's records system in preparing for
future automation (it is particularly benefi-
cial to small and medium -sized agencies with
manual records systems).
After taking this
training, participants
will be able to under-
The "Productivity and
Performance Appraisal
Workshop" presents the
major performance
appraisal systems
through a hands -on
approach, with
recommendations for
designing a new rating
system or improving
upon an eidsting one.
able to work closely
with both management and line stab.
Upon completing this course, participants
will be able to explain basic planning and
research methodology, list selection criteria
and training for planning and research
personnel; discuss organizational consider-
ations for planning and research units;
stand the evolution of
police records; under-
stand the various
types of records sys-
tems and how each
system relates to an
operational need; ana-
lyze present systems
and automation of
those systems; mod-
ernize existing re-
cords programs; un-
derstand automated
management without
being overwhelmed
by technology; and
understand federal
records retention laws
August 5-7, 1992;
Lansing, IL, Hosted by
the Lansing Police
Department
LACP Member $340,
Nonmember $400
rya lclivity and Performance
-- n -oraisa! Workshop
This program was developed to provide
police supervisors and managers with an
overx,iew of the major performance appraisal
., stems through a hands -on approach, with
recommendations for either designing a nee.
rating system or improving upon an existing
one. Techniques for enhancing performance
interviews will be discussed to increase
confidence levels for this important task.
Upon completing this course, partidp
will be able to develop valid and rehaRW
performance appraisal systems to measure
individual performance; design and imple-
ment upward evaluation systems to provide
feedback to supervisory personnel; measure
public expectations and determine the
degree to which they are being satisfied by
their department; assess employee attitudes
and perceptions to identdv conditions and
practices that ultimately affect performances
and identify management skills and tech-
niques to improve the current employee
performance.
July 6 -10, 1992; Newport, RJ; Hosted by
the Newport Polka Department
L4CP Member $425, Nonmember $485
Progressive Patrol Administration
Providing essential police services to the
community is largely dependent upon the
effective utilization of officers assigned to
patrol operations. Agencies seeking to gain
greater efficiency from patrol officers have
experimented with a variety of innovative
personnel deployment, scheduling at�
management schemes. Patro l enhanceme
strategies, performance evaluation in the
patrol function, beat structure, differential
police response, and the role and respon-
sibility of the patrol supervisor along with
other progressive concepts in patrol admin-
istration will be examined in this program
After taking this training, division and
watch commanders and patrol supervisors
responsible for the management and deploy-
ment of police patrol personnel will be able
to implement and evaluate different police
response systems; create innovative
approaches to management of patrol person-
nel; and examine the varied roles and
responsibilities of patrol supervisors and
administrators.
August 24 -28, 1992; Denver, CO
L9CP Member 5425, Nonmember $485
'Only sworn police officers or full -time•
employees of law enforcement agencies may
attend.
6 1ACP Leadership and Managemeni irmmnv I n _eoiemoe- Imo: / _1J
0
I]
L I
RESOLUTION NO. 9734
RESOLUTION TO RENAME FISCHER HILL TO BOY SCOUT PARK
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has received many hours of volunteer labor
from many fine institutions over the years; and
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson area Boy Scouts desire to provide labor to develop
and maintain Boy Scout Park and other locations throughout the community in
1992
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson area Boy Scouts have pledged future support to
develop and maintain Boy Scouts Park and other park locations
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1) that the Hutchinson City Council
of the Boy Scouts and to recognize their
on Highway 7 East to Boy Scout Park.
recognizes and appreciates the support
efforts, renames Fischers Hill, located
Adopted by the City Council the 9th day of June, 1992.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
7-74
• RESOLUTION NO. 9735
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION BY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR
SERVE AMERICA NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ACT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has received funding from
various agencies over the years, and
WHEREAS, the Serve America National and Community Services Act
has funds available to serve school -aged youth and disadvantaged
youth for promoting national and community service activities,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the Hutchinson City Council hereby authorizes City staff
to make application for said funding in conjunction with the
Hutchinson School District No. 423 as a cooperating agency.
Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
•
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
is
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
• RESOLUTION NO. 9736
RESOLUTION SPECIFYING AND APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FORM FOR COLLECTING, HAULING,
OR CONVEYING OF GARBAGE, OTHER REFUSE,
MIXED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE OR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
WHEREAS, the City Council under the licensing ordinance for
garbage and refuse hauler (Ordinance No. 92 -57) may specify and
approve the "application form" for collecting, hauling, or
conveying of garbage, other refuse, mixed municipal solid waste or
recyclable materials, and
WHEREAS, starting July 1, 1992, there may be one or more
haulers moving the aforementioned materials in the City of
Hutchinson,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson herein adopts Exhibit A, herein attached, as the
application form and fees for licensing pursuant to Ordinance No.
92 -57, adopted May 20, 1992.
• Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
APPLICATION FOR LICENSING
(UNDER ORDINANCE NO. 92 -57)
TYPE OF APPLICATION (PURSUANT TO SECTION 6.23, SUBSECTION 2)
Commercial Hauling .......... FEE $100 /Year
Residential Hauling ......... FEE $100 /Year
Recycling ...................FEE $ 50 /Year
APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER:
PHONE NUMBER:
• NAME AND TITLE OF ALL OFFICERS OF APPLICANT'S FIRM:
NUMBER OF YEARS APPLICANT HAS BEEN:
IN COMMERCIAL HAULING ....................... Years
IN RESIDENTIAL HAULING ...................... Years
RECYCLING .... ............................... Years
LIST REFUSE EQUIPMENT OWNED OR LEASED (INCLUDE RECYCLING EQUIPMENT)
u
7_,/
LIST ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT NEEDED TO PURCHASE OR LEASE TO MEET •
LICENSING REQUIREMENT FOR ADEQUATE TRANSIT VEHICLES
(SECTION 6.23, SUBSECTION 4,E)
INSURANCE COVERAGES (SEE SECTION 6.23, SUBSECTION 4, D)
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AGENT:
PHONE NUMBER: •
NOTE: Attach insurance binder to application form that
meets or exceeds limits established in the ordinance.
MONTHLY SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR
(SEE SECTION 6.23, SUBSECTION 9)
Are you aware of your responsibility to submit names and
addresses of your business and commercial account no later
than the 10th of each month to the City Administrator?
YES NO
Are you willing to maintain a local telephone number and a
daily 24 -hour answering service to handle service questions?
YES NO
I hereby certify that I have completely filled out the entire
above application, together with the attached and executed Release
of Information Form, and that the application is true, correct, and
accurate.
Signature of Applicant
Date
•
As an applicant for a license from the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, I am required to furnish information which that agency
may use in determining my moral, physical, mental, and financial
qualifications. In this connection, I hereby expressly authorize
release of any and all information which you may have concerning
me, including information of a confidential or privileged nature.
I hereby release the agency with which I am seeking
application for license, and any organization, company or person
furnishing information to that agency as expressly authorized
above, from any liability for damage which may result from
furnishing the information requested.
•
Applicant's Full
Printed Name:
(First) (Middle) (Last)
Applicant's Address:
(Number) (Street)
7 —(/-
(City)
(County)
(State /Zip)
Applicant's
Birth
Date:
(Month)
(Day)
(Year)
Applicant's
Place
of Birth:
(City)
(State)
Applicant's
Social Security No.:
Applicant's
Driver's License No.:
Date:
•
Applicant's
Signature
7 —(/-
Dear Business, Commercial or Industrial Customer:
Over the past fifteen years or more the city has had a monthly
base charge for refuse service; showing on your water /sewer /refuse
bill, whether or not refuse was present, pursuant to a long term
refuse contact with Junker Sanitation.
As of July 1st, business /commercial /industrial accounts (only)
will = be charged any base charge for garbage, and furthermore
yQU will need to make arrangements directly with a licensed refuse
hauler.
The city may have several licensed commercial hauler(s) to
choose from following the council meeting of June 23rd, as several
area haulers have expressed a strong interest to provide the
service on a private and competitive basis.
Feel free to contact Diane Olsen at City Hall at 587 -5151 ext.
204 to obtain a list of licensed haulers, duly authorized by the •
city council.
The haulers on this list will have complied with insurance
requirement(s) and minimum vehicle standards necessary for
transporting garbage.
Sincerely,
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
I
M E M O R A N D U M
June 4, 1992
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Need to Reschedule Special City Council Meeting
of Monday, June 15, 1992
is The County's dispatch /911 consultant, plus the sheriff, called me
on Thursday and stated the County's consultant will not be able to
complete the evaluation /report by June 15.
11
The consultant and sheriff offered the following dates for them to
be in attendance at a Hutchinson special Council meeting:
Monday, July 6
Wednesday, July 8
Thursday, July 9
Wednesday, July 22
Thursday, July 23
/mj s
cc: County Commissioners
City Hall
Parks & Recreation
Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West
900 Harrington Street
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- printed on recycled paper -
/
Potential Organizational Structure
to Maximize Economic Development and Housing Needs
for the City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson Community Development Corporation (HCDC) and the Hutchinson Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HHRA) are presently reviewing various organizational structures to
determine the most efficient method of providing economic growth and adequate housing.
HCDC and HHRA are considering hiring a full-time Executive Director beginning
approximately September 1, 1992.
It is felt at this time an Executive Director would be hired with both economic development and
housing qualifications, and after the individual has had an opportunity to become familiar with the
community and its needs, to then finalize an organizational structure.
During this initial time of employment, the new Executive Director would staff both the HCDC
and the HHRA. The present HHRA director (Jean Ward) would continue with her present part-time
employment of administration of Park Towers.
At such time as each board along with the City Council would feel comfortable in an
organizational change, a new structure could then be presented to the City Council for their action
(possibly to take effect January 1, 1993).
POWERS GIVEN BY CITY COUNCIL
UNDER MN STATUTES (KEEPS CONTROL)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PRESENT HUTCHINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR \
HOUSING INC.
AS ADVISORY
PARK TOWERS ADMINISTRATION
DIRECTOR -HALF -TIME
MAINTENANCE--FULL-TIME
PRESENT HCDC
AS ADVISORY
PLANNING.
FINANCE.
PUBLIC RELATIONS
COMMITTEES
GRANTS & LOAN OFFICER
Budget
1992
Executive Director ($55,000 annual for salary, fringe and expenses)
September 1 – December 31, 1992 $18,333
Funds from HCDC 10,600
Needed $7,733
Grants and Loan Officer
(Connie Mangan — funding for this position
is covered through 1992) $ 0
Park Towers Administration (in house budget) 0
Funds needed for 1992 $7,733
1993
Executive Director (salary, fringe and expenses) $55,000
Grants and Loan Officer (salary, fringe and expenses) 43,000
Park Towers Administration (in -house budget) 0
Office expenses (if housed in City Hall) 2,500
$100,500
Funding Sources
Present HCDC Budget $33,580
Balance after Connie Mangan's
salary is paid from projects for
which the city has received funding 19,000
$52,580
Additional Funds needed for 1993 $47,920
•
Possible sources for additional funding:
• 1. Department of Public Service Grant
for Energy Assistance Using Utility Energy
Efficiency Services (10% to match)*
2. Other Grants — Housing Economic Development
•
11
3. City General Fund
4. Interest from HRA Reserve Fund
5. Possible Funding from Administration of
Tax Increment Funding Bonds
* Note on No. 1 above:
up to $45,000
Administration of Hutch Utilities Energy Conservation and Efficiency program from their
mandatory set - aside:
Estimated total per year: 1993 – $
1994 – $15,000
1995 – $75,000
1996 — $150,000
1997 — $150,000
This program would fit right into our rehab program (energy items).
10-15%
Administration
HCDC /HHRA
0
1993 Proposed Alternative Minimum Budget
Executive Director (full time)
Salary and Benefits $ 50,000.
Expenses (travel, conferences, etc.) 5,000.
Secretary (1/2 time)
Secretary plus loan & grant accounting 7,500.
Office Expenses (telephone, postage, printing, supplies) 1,500.
This assumes location would be in city hall where no rent
would be required.
$ 64,000.
•
Source of Funding
Present HCDC Budget $ 33,600.
Carry over of administrative
funds from grants written 11.400.
-45,000.
Additional Funds needed for 1993 $ 19,000.
1J
•
C
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy DeVries, Director of Water 4 Wastewater Operation
SUBJECT: Application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to
accept leachate from the McLeod County Landfill.
I am requesting that the City of Hutchinson
Pollution Control Agency to accept leachate
Landfill. The landfill will have to comply
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and U.S.
Agency standards and requirements relating
including any pretreatment requirements.
apply to the Minnesota
from the McLeod County
with all applicable
Enviromental Protection
:o the discharge,
Leachate from landfills are currently being treated at Municipal
Wastewater Facilities in the state. If the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency approves this permit we will be working with our
consultant to issue them a permit. We will be charging the
landfill $50,000 - 100,000 per year to treat this product, if
the permits are all approved.
cc: Gary Plotz
John Rodeberg
RD /ds
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
0
H
U
T
C
P
U
B
L
I C
June 9, 1992
u
H I N S O N
S C H O O L S
^�5 ,'561 ♦ 1p',i
o92
m
r�9�s2h2 EZ ZZ�2��
Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Gary:
Enclosed are three copies of the agreements for the lease of the Civic
Arena and the lease of other recreational facilities between the school
district and the city. These agreements were approved and executed by our
School Board at their regular meeting of June 9th. Please return two exe-
cuted copies to me after the City Council has acted on these leases.
We have done some checking with the high school carpentry instructor
regarding the building to be constructed in lieu of the costs for Tartan
Park. The class will be able to construct this building during the 1992 -93
school year.
We look forward to continuing good relations with the city and appreciate
the cooperation extended to us by your recreation director.
Sincerely,
R Stine L. Folstrom
Director of Support Services
KLF /jp
enc.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
DISTRICT ApMINISTRATION 30 GLEN
STREET NORTH (611 5280 HUCHIN_ SON TECHNICAL CO_ LLEGE 2 CENTURY AVENUE (612) 5] -363
0 P 11 P 1
0
C
June 3, 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Lease Agreements with School District
Recreation Director Dolf Moon and I met with Finance Director Kris
Folstrom and Superintendent Glenn Matejka on Wednesday, June 3
• regarding the following three lease agreements with the school
district.
HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT & HUTCHINSON CIVIC ARENA (TWO YEAR)
The only change is an adjustment in the rental rate equivalent to
the CPI adjustment for Minneapolis /St. Paul the preceding 12
months. Specifically, this is a 2.3 percent adjustment in all
rates on page one in each year of the proposed agreement.
USE FACILITIES -- HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT & CITY OF HUTCHINSON
The recreation center rate was raised from $10 /hour to $15 /hour by
the Parks & Recreation Board a couple of years ago. The City has
been collecting the $15 /hour rate over the past couple of years;
however, the agreement should be updated.
SCHOOL DISTRICT/ CITY RECREATION BUILDING AND USE OF ROBERTS PARK
The Park Department wants a building 24 X 24 at Tartan Park in lieu
of the $600 per year rent payment (five years) for Tartan Park.
This is the same arrangement that was done in 1987 -1992.
• /mjs City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 C
Printed on receded paper -
•
•
•
LEASE AGREEMENT
HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND HUTCHINSON CIVIC ARENA
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 9th day of June, 1992 by the City of
Hutchinson, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called First
Party, and the Independent School District No. 423 of McLeod
County, hereinafter called Second Party, WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the First Party has assumed the operation and maintenance
of the Hutchinson Civic Arena, through the guidance and
recommendation(s) of the Civic Arena Board;
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Second Party to rent the Civic
Arena for programming to be conducted and sponsored through its
physical education program and /or extra - curricular programs;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the terms and
covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby mutually agree
as follows:
1. PREMISES: The First Party agrees to lease and hereby
does lease, and the Second Party agrees to take and
hereby does take, the 130' x 230' building, excluding
office space and concession stand, located at 950
Harrington Street in City of Hutchinson, County of
McLeod, State of Minnesota, with the following legal
description:
The South 250 feet of the East 275 feet of Lot 90
Lynn Addition to the City of Hutchinson
2. TERMS OF LEASE: This lease shall be from the term of
July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1994.
3. RENTAL PAYMENT AND GAME RECEIPTS: The Second Party
agrees to pay the First Party a rental payment for
the premises as shown below:
1992 -93 Rate (1.023 increase over 1990 -91)
Practice ice time (175 hours) 60.02 /hour
Regular season
(10 games, 3.5
* (see A3)
hockey games 204.66 /game
hrs /game)
Non -ice time (50 hours)
1993 -94 increase factor
-1-
37.53 /hour
TOTAL:
1.023
TOTAL
$10,503.50
2,046.60
1,876.50
$14,426.60
$14,758.42
9 —d'_C7'
Each yearly total amount will be paid on or before •
February 1 of 1993 and 1994 respectively. All game
admission receipts shall be the property and
responsibility of the Second Party.
* Hockey games in excess of ten (10) shall be billed
at the agreed upon rate per game.
4. DEFINITIONS:
a. "Ice- Time" - The period of time the ice is on the
floor of the premises and utilized for hockey games
and /or practices.
b. "Non- Ice - Time" - The period of time no ice is on the
floor and utilization is for sports other than
hockey, i.e., tennis, track.
C. Exclusive use - The time the Second Party is in
possession of the premises for "ice- time" and
"non- ice - time" use, without interference from the
First and /or Second Party(s), except for normal
maintenance of the building.
5. USE OF FACILITIES: The First Party agrees to lease the
premises for exclusive use at following designated times •
and activities.
a. The Second Party shall be allotted 175 hours of ice
time per school year which shall be used for
practice time from November 15, 1991 through the
completion of the regular High School hockey season
of the 1992 -93 and 1993 -94 school years
respectively. In the event more than 175 hours
practice ice time is used, the Second Party shall
be billed $50 per hour.
b. All practice time(s) for Squad "A" and /or Squad "B"
shall be scheduled as agreed upon between the Civic
Center manager and school athletic director.
C. Game ice -time for Squad "B" shall be from 5:30 p.m.
to 7:30 p.m.; game ice -time for Squad "A" shall be
from 7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. All hockey games shall
be Monday through Saturday, excluding holidays. All
regularly scheduled hockey games and dates are set
forth in a schedule hereto attached and identified
as Exhibit "A" and may be canceled and /or
rescheduled only after mutual consultation of the
First Party and the Second Party, or their respect-
ive representatives.
•
-2-
• d. In addition to the 175 hours of ice -time per school
year, the First Party shall provide a total of 50
hours of non - ice -time for the purpose of encouraging
use of the Civic Arena for sports other than hockey,
i.e., tennis or track. Non - ice -time shall be
utilized between four (4) days subsequent to the
State Hockey Tournament and May 31, 1993 and 1994,
respectively. In the event more than 50 hours of
non - ice -time is utilized, the Second Party shall be
billed $35 per hour. All non - ice -time shall be
scheduled as not to conflict with other activities
of the First Party, and any non - ice -time not
scheduled one (1) week in advance cannot be
guaranteed. The Center Manager has full authority
to refuse center availability after May 31 if
conflicts exist.
e. In the event the facility is rendered unfit for
hockey use due to fire or any other cause, the
Second Party's obligation for rent shall be
adjusted on a pro -rata basis and the party of the
first part shall refund within 30 days after
termination that portion of the rent covering the
period of non -use. If the damage cannot be repaired
within 30 days, the Second Party may exercise the
option to terminate.
• 6. FIRST PARTY RESPONSIBILITIES:
C�
J
a. To provide all utilities, including heat, light,
water, sewer, refuse; maintain all ice - making and
cleaning equipment and machines; flooding the ice
rink; cleaning of the ice surface; maintaining the
parking lot; and the normal maintenance, repair and
replacement of boards, goals and nets; and make all
necessary structural alterations, repairs and
maintenance.
b. To provide janitor service for cleaning of the
locker and shower area each day and cleaning of the
bleacher area, storage area and upper arena areas as
needed.
C. To operate, maintain and receive revenues from all
concessions and /or vending machines, unless other-
wise assigned in whole or part.
7. SECOND PARTY RESPONSIBILITIES:
a. To provide personnel and supplies for the sale and
collection of admission tickets.
-3-
b. To provide for payment of any Minnesota sales tax •
for admission.
C. To provide towel and laundry service.
d. To designate personnel to supervise students at any
time the building is being used by its students
under this agreement, and to designate one
individual to be responsible for key(s) for use of
the building while in use by its students.
To be responsible for loss or theft of school and /or
personnel property while stored or otherwise within
the premises.
To make all arrangements and /or payment for
announcer(s), scoreboard operator(s), referees
and supervisory personnel.
g. To designate the coach or supervisor for seeing all
pieces of equipment and supplies of the school and
players are picked up and properly stored in the
areas and cabinets, as provided by the First Party,
and to see that all students are out of the building
by one -half (112) hour after close of practice or
game. •
8. RULES AND REGULATIONS:
The rules and regulations of Independent School District
No. 423 pertaining to student conduct shall be in effect
during all times this building is used by the school.
Additional policies governing the conduct of students may
be developed as needed by the Civic Arena board and the
school administration. The policies, rules and
regulations shall be enforced by school personnel as
assigned by the school administration and the City
personnel as assigned by the Civic Arena Coordinator.
INSURANCE:
The First Party agrees to pay a sum equal to the actual
expense for bodily injury and property damage insurance.
10. INDEMNIFICATION:
The Second Party agrees to save harmless, protect and
indemnify the First Party from any and all claims, not
fully covered by Section 9 Insurance, of every kind and
nature whatsoever arising out of the personal injury or
property damage on the leased premises while it is under
control of and being used by the party of the second •
-4-
• part. The party of the second part also agrees to pay
all costs, including attorney's fees, incurred in
connection with the defense against such claim not fully
covered by insurance.
11. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS:
All provisions of the lease, herein stated, are binding
upon the successors or assigns of the respective parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this agreement to be
effective the day and year above written.
Amendment: If in the event the Second Party would take action to
discontinue the athletic programs that would normally utilize the
arena, the School District has the right to give notice by
July 1, 1993 to withdraw from the second year of this contract.
In Presence of: CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BY
Mayor
•
•
-5-
I'M
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
NO. 923
BY
Chairman
BY
Clerk
• USE OF FACILITIES
HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT
AND
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
•
•
1992 -93
1993 -94
It shall be the policy of the School District and the City of
Hutchinson to rent Recreation Center Building facilities at a cost
of $15.00 per hour with the rentee providing a minimum of one
building supervisor.
It shall be the policy that the pool will be rented at $15.00 per
hour and the rentee shall provide one building supervisor. Other
staff needed shall be provided by the renter.
General Guidelines
When use of facilities is needed because of inclement weather, a
contact must be made by noon to the City Recreation Director of the
School Activities Director, and facilities can be used only upon
approval of the above mentioned directors.
Renters shall always follow the approved time schedule.
Renters shall assist in setup for activities or for the next
activities.
Renters shall leave the building in good condition.
The renter's supervisor of the activity must stay until all
participants have left the building including emergency situations.
No baseball or softball will be allowed in the City Recreation
Building, unless the City gives permission for limited softball
practices.
Sunday use of school facilities will be held to special events
unless approval is granted including consideration of rental costs
by the school district.
* Rentee - (owner of facility)
* Renter - (user of facility)
-1-
9 -�EP
SCHOOL DISTRICT /CITY RECREATION BUILDING •
USE OF ROBERTS PARK
Softball
Estimate 39 days of use which includes 24 softball games - -- 8 "A"
squad games, 8 "B" squad games, and 8 "C" squad games.
For practice three (3) fields are used from 3:00 - 5:30 p.m. For
games two (2) fields are used from 4:00 - 6:00 p.m.
High school softball practice starts indoors at the elementary
school in the beginning of March. As soon as weather permits,
usually the first week in April, practice is moved outdoors to
Roberts Park. The above mentioned 39 days does not account for any
inclement weather cancellations.
It shall be the policy of the school district amd the City of
Hutchinson that the school district will rent Roberts Park for
$1600 per softball season for the above mentioned use. This cost
is based on 40 days x 3 fields. This includes material, labor and
use of city equipment.
Baseball
As of this time we do not have a schedule for use of Tartan Park as •
it is not prepared for this spring. The cost for the use of this
facility will be determined at a later date.
It is agreed between the Hutchinson School District and the City of
Hutchinson that the school district will rent Tartan Park at a cost
of $600 per year for the high school baseball season, effective
with the 1993 school year. This includes material, labor and use
of City equipment to prepare and maintain the baseball field for
practice and games of the high school baseball team.
This agreement is for five years: 1993 through 1998.
In lieu of cash payment for this five year lease, the school
district agrees to confer upon the City a 24' x 24' building
constructed by the high school carpentry class. The aforementioned
building to be built during this contract period and will be
conferred to the City with the moving and placing of said building
being the responsibility of the City. The City shall provide any
cement work and the garage door.
Track
Should the city recreation department decide to offer track
activities, a cost for the use of the track will be determined.
11
-2-
• Golf
It shall be the policy in the use of the city recreation building
that only golf wiffle balls can be used in the facility and these
wiffle balls must be hit off special rubber mats used for indoor
golf.
Tennis
It shall be the policy that the school district and the City of
Hutchinson will share equally the cost of maintaining tennis court
surfaces, lights and fences. The tennis courts referred to are
located on the elementary school and high school site. This equal
sharing of maintenance costs will allow the school district to use
the courts for the high school program and allow the city
recreation department to use the courts for their activities. The
school sports season shall receive priority time on the courts.
This policy has been adopted by the city council and the school
board and will remain in effect from July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1994.
Superintendent of Schools City Administrator
•
Date
171
-3-
Date
C
June 4, 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Connie Mangan, Downtown Project Coordinator
SUBJECT: Downtown Life Safety Grant Program
Fire Marshal George Field has now completed the inspections of all
buildings whose owners have applied for assistance through the City
of Hutchinson's Life Safety Grant Program. Project plans and
specifications are being completed, and the project is ready to
bid. The project will be awarded by the City under one contract.
• The goal of the program is to give tenants safe egress from the
building in the event of a fire. To accomplish this goal, we
propose to install the following items as needed in each of the
applicants' buildings:
1. Interconnected smoke detectors on each floor
2. Type X sheetrock on the underside of stairways,
hallways and other openings
3. Other electrical life safety items
4. Exit signs
5. Emergency corridor lighting
6. Building entrance and /or exit separations
The project is estimated at $125,000. As stated in the August 20,
1991 memo to the Mayor and City Council from the HCDC Board, if the
bid exceeds $150,000 the project will be reconsidered.
The funding for this project is from the City of Hutchinson's
Revolving Loan Fund.
• /mjs
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 9
- Printed on recycled paper -
C
June 8, 1992
MEMO
TO: MAYOR 8 CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL. FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: BURNS MANOR HOSPITAL INTEREST__
The city advanced to the nursing home a loan of $70,000 2 years
ago. The amount had been partially paid down and has been carried
at an interest rate of 7 %. The books of the water and sewer fund,
which carries this loan, shows a balance of $60,000 with interest
earned of $5,927.54 at December 31, 1992. Interest has been
accruing at the rate of $365.14 per month.
We have been repaid on this loan per a schedule prepared by
• Hospital Finance Director Karen Malmsten, within the past two
months. We have received two payments totaling $20,000. The
schedule calls for total repayment by December 1992. Of course as
the payments are recorded the interest amounts decrease.
Interest, if forgiven, would affect the water and sewer fund
earnings.
It should also be pointed out the city is currently carrying on the
books about $22,800 from 1991 and prior which we have not ever
charged interest. This represents charges for insurance, consulting
work and other shared costs but paid in total by the city.
• City Hall Parks & Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
cut n
community
hospital
a Life Span' member
1 gnway 'S South, Hutchrsoh. Minnesota 5135 0 • Teepho ^e c'2,537
June 1, 1992
v 23,G456T8
RECEIVE_:)
c
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and ti
Members of Hutchinson City Council
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members:
At their regular meeting in April, the Hutchinson Community Hospital /Burns
Manor Nursing Home board of directors considered a request from staff to make
a request to the City Council to ask forgiveness of past, present and future
interest on the repayment of the loan that has a current balance of $60,000
for Burns Manor.
The following reflects the discussion held on this matter:
"BMNH Loan Interest: Gilmer and Graves reported on their recent
discussion with Mayor Paul Ackland regarding the $90,000 borrowed by the
nursing home prior to the merger from the City at 8% interest. The City
Attorney and City's director of finance were asked if they would remove
• the interest charges. They responded by asking that the HCH /BMNH board
send a request to the City Council to remove interest charges on that
debt. A repayment plan to pay back the loan from the City and pay back
the approximate $10,000 to the memorial fund (used to help finance the
same project) will be made. Mayor Ackland indicated a willingness to do
so in lieu of HCH funds used to pay for costs associated with the
merger. Malmsten will work with the City's finance director regarding
this.
"Following discussion:
"Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to make a request
of the City Council for their forgiveness of past, present and
future interest on the $90,000 loan to Burns Manor. All were in
favor. Motion carried."
Karen Malmsten, the director of finance for our organization, has met with Ken
Merrill and has worked out a rather aggressive repayment schedule for this
debt. We thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have
further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/
BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME '-
'� 4L 6 --e�
Philip G. Graves
Chief Executive Officer
• PGG4h
9 -�
:18eflu'rioix NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING7 COST 1 BE ASSESSED AM11
LETTING ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMEW ROLL NO. 277
/
PROJECT / 1
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of First Avenue N.E.
from Hassan Street to Adams Street by the construction of storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, concrete
curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the
bid price for such improvement is $161,557.20, and the expenses incurred or to
be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $35,542.5$ so that the
total cost of the improvement will be $197,099.78,
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HHUTCH321SON, H02IIE.SOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $119,728.29 , and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefitted property owners is declared to be $ 77,371.49
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of
6.2 (+ or -) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of
Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within
the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
City Administrator
0
Mayor
9 -//,
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 277
LETTING NO. 4
PROJECT NO. 92 -07
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 9th day of June,
1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment
of the cost of improving First Avenue N.E. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by
the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water
service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such
proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCF@1SON, MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 14th day of July, 1992, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.H. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the
total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to
the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks
prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the
City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid October 1st, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the
City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
1
City Administrator
Mayor
0
�14
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQ .
ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
LETTING NO. 12
PROJECT NO. 92 -18
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. A certain petition requesting the improvement of Hutchinson Utilities
Access Drive Industrial Boulevard from Michigan Street to City Limits by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water
service, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances, filed with the Council on June 9th, 1992, is
hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property
affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 429.035.
2. The petition is hereby referred to the Director of Engineering and he
is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the
Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is
feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as
• recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
City Administrator
•
Mayor
9
CITY OF HUTCHIKSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST •
HUTCHINSON, HN 55350
ENGINEER'S REPORT
DATE: June 9, 1992
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Letting No. 12, Project No. 92 -18
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible
and recommend it be constructed.
Project No. 92 -18: Hutchinson Utilities Access Drive (Industrial Boulevard)
from Michigan Street to City Limits by construction of
storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain,
water service, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
Construction Cost
Engineering /Administration (14 %)
Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest (8 %)
ESTIMATED TOTAL ---- --- ---- - - - - --
Assessable Cost
Deferred Assessable Cost
City Bonded
City Other Funds
MSA
MNDOT
ESTIMATED TOTAL ---- - - - - --
" Hutchinson Utilities
JPR /pv
S 172,000.00 •
S 24,080.00
S 13,760.00
------ S 209.840.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
S _ 50,000.00
S 159,840.00'
S 0.00
$ 0.00
-- ----------- - -- S 209,840.00
•
RESOLUTION NO.
• RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT, WAIVING NEARING AND
ORDERING IMPROVEHENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
ILTTING NO. 12
PROJECT NO. 92 -18
WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of Hutchinson
Utilities Access Drive Industrial Boulevard from Michigan Street to City
Limits by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service,
watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous
base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, was duly presented to the
Council on the 9th day of June, 1992; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 9th, 1992, a
report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering with reference to the
improvement, and this report was received by the Council on June 9th, 1992;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA;
1. The Council finds and determines that said petition was signed by
all owners of real property abutting upon the street(s) named as the location
of the improvement and a hearing on said improvement is hereby waived.
• 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council
resolution adopted June 9th, 1992
3. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
City Administrator
•
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS •
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 12
PROJECT NO. 92 -18
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications
for the improvement of Hutchinson Utilities Access Drive Industrial Boulevard
from Michigan Street to City Limits by constriction of storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, sewer service, watermain, water service, grading, gravel base, curb and
gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. on July 6th, 1992, in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director of
Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council on •
July 14th, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid
will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City
Administrator and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent of the amount
of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 9th day of June, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
DAVID H. ARNOTD
•o +Rx a. MoDOME Li,
STEVEN e. ANDERSON
O. HARRY ANDERSON'
STRVP.N S. RODE
uuRA R, PRETI AND
DAVID A. DAVEGOENANN
PAUL D. DOVE"
JOSRPR M. PAISMENT
GAMES UT11EY
RICHARD O. WOES
CATRRYM D. REN6R
June 5, 1992
Aimox,,'? & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5881 CEDAR LANE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, i\'iTNNF90TA 55415 -1492
(612)545 -9000
MN TOLL PRER 500.073 -4545
FAX (*=) 545 -IIP3
OF coma•.,
WILLIAM N-. CAMRRON
RAYMOND C. LAII,IER
PAUL M.AF.OICII
CHART.PS R.CARMTCRART,"
501 SOUTH FOURTH STRP,Et
PRINCETON, NINWTSOTA 55911
(O12)350-22L4
FAX (St2) 059.5500
101 PART[ PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 5]950
(612) 5B7-7515
FAX (612) 551.4006
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator EY U.S. MAIL AND FAX
Hutchinson City Hall FAX No, 294 -4240
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Country Club Terrace Mobile Home Storm Shelter (Evacuation
Plan)
Our File No. 3188 -90149
Dear Gary:
• As was discussed in prior correspondence, Paul Zerby, an attorney
employed with the Minnesota Attorney General's office, is in the
process of commencing an action to revoke the license of Hutch,
Inc. on the basis of their failure to construct an appropriate
storm shelter as required by Minnesota State law.
Ono of the issues that is likely to come up in the litigation has
to do with the appropriate remedy. The Licensing Department has
requested that the City of Hutchinson collect the rents from the
tenants at Country Club Terrace and expend the funds so collected
for the purpose of constructing a storm shelter. Essentially, the
state is asking the city to serve as a trustee in this matter.
I think it is very Intikely that the city will be called upon to
act in this role, but I suppose since it is at least a possibility,
formal City Council approval should be secured so that if Mr. Block
ultimately fails to construct the appropriate storm shelter and
after several appeals such a storm shelter needs to be constructed
by some other party, the city is in a position to step in and see
that the job gets done.
According to Zerby, the City of Lakeville also agreed to serve in
this capacity when a similar problem was encountered with the
mobile home park in that community. The procedure worked well and,
• as we expect with our problems with Hutch, Inc., in Lakeville the
park owner eventually agreed to make the improvements and to pay
for them himself. While I anticipate a similar result under the
'CKRTIFIT.D AS A CIVIL TRIAL 6PECTALTST AY THE MINNESOTA STATE DAN ASSOCIATION
"CP.RTIM T) AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MN-NESOTA STATE SAU ASSOCIATION / `
Gary D. Plot2
June 5, 1992
Page 2
facts of our case, these matters are not without doubt and I would
appreciate it if you would ask the City Council to consider at the
next regularly scheduled City Council meeting (this coming Tuesday
evening) whether or not it would be willing to serve in this
capacity. I will ask for a formal motion to that effect at the
time of the City Council meeting.
Enclosed is a resolution that will serve to grant permission.
Obviously, this item needs to be on the agenda for Tuesday evening.
Thank you. Best regards.
very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry An rson
GBA /pb
Enclosure
149 -1c r.01
•
0
J
... _ . s.-.._ -. . 1 . Y ) .. Y.. -.. .._...-
J U N— M— 9 2 PR I 1 0: 4 9 A R N 0 L D 6. M c D 0 W E L L P. 0.4
• RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is a municipal corporation
duly organized and authorized by Minnesota State Law and City
Charter;
WHEREAS, Country Club Terrace is a mobile home park previously
licensed by the State of Minnesota, Department of Health, and is
presently in noncompliance with Minnesota State Public Health and
Safety Requirements mandating the construction of a storm shelter
to protect the residents of Country Club Terrace;
WHEREAS, the public health and safety of the residents of
Country Club Terrace is a matter of concern to the City Council for
the City of Hutchinson;
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has requested that the City
• Council agree to act as a defacto receiver for the purpose of
collecting rents and disbursing said rents to appropriate parties
for the construction of a storm shelter and the City of Hutchinson
is willing to so serve;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council for the City
of Hutchinson that the City of Hutchinson is willing and does agree
to serve as a receiver for the purpose of collecting rents from
Country Club Terrace and for the purpose of disbursing said rents
to the appropriate parties for the construction of a duly licensed
and qualified storm shelter for the health, safety and benefit of
the residents of Country Club Terrace, provided, however, that said
resolution is conditioned upon appropriate court order allowing the
• City of Hutchinson to so act.
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor of Hutchinson attests Gary D. Plotz
•
0
0
KIRurrl tjUK 1NFKOY1iML6"
$Y 100% TMRS
DATED: 6TW3e 3,1992
TO 77-M COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HMI CHINSON, MIWNESOTA:
we,jthe undersigned, being 100% of the owners of the real property affected
by impro ement(s) herein designated, respectfully petition your honorable body to
make the following improvement(s) pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429:
Con traction of ojrb, gutters and Bitmdn= surface
on the fillowIng streets or rights -of -way: '
P.eith 8t.- frM Ciicadto Clevelalxi AM.
All of ClerslAM3 W. WE
�4vF X 1.1- � 81� {s$VIM-r, .17" ge
And to wl4Iive the improvement a ent hearing under the terms of Hinneso Statute 429, and
tv aasesh the vut$-r east of the impsgvement wgn3nst the effected p"p&rty_
OWW R
tl
I u`
I rr
rl
.L
4
rr
q
L4
I ve caused an examination to be made of the records provided by the County of
Hcl.eod, n order to ascertain the names -and addresses of each person, firm og
corporal on having an interest In each lot, tract or parcel for which inprovamt is
requested and against which a special assessmeut will be made for the entire cost of
the i"pr vemeet. 'After malahg search and inquiry, I am idatrle t$firrd any'other'
persons, rlrroY or corporation who have interest ether than those lf%tad. To my
best kno ledge, the persons herein names are all the owners of properties affected
by the
3mprovenent.
BY:.l'
TITLE:, \1,ca FM.7
0 TOM. P.9L
TOTAL P.02
C
FIRST ADDENDUM
CITY OF HUTCHINSON'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
INTERIM REFUSE HAULING SERVICES
June 9, 1992
Dear Interested Refuse Hauler:
The City of Hutchinson hereby encloses Addendum No. 1 to the
original refuse hauling Recruest for Proposal as published in the
Hutchinson Leader, June 9, 1992. The attached Addendum No. 1 will,
likewise, be published in the Hutchinson Leader.
If you have any questions, including but not limited to ballpark
• estimates of residential refuse volume per year, ballpark estimates
of compost material taken to the city designated compost site,
scope of no charge refuse services for various City of Hutchinson
departments, feel free to contact me at (612) 587 -5151, Ext. 201.
Sincerely,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
GDP: mjs
Enc.
cc: Mayor & Council
G. Barry Anderson,
City Directors
• City Hail
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
City Atty.
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
140-A
FIRST ADDENDUH TO CITY OF HUTCHINSONIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR INTERIM REFUSE HAULING SERVICES
This addendum is issued by the City of Hutchinson this _ day
of June, 1992.
RECITALS:
1. The City of Hutchinson has issued a request for proposal
dated for the purpose of requesting proposals for
the hauling of garbage and refuse for residents for the City of
Hutchinson for the period of July 1, 1992 through September 30,
1992;
2. Since the issuance of the request for proposal, requests
for clarification of some of the requirements of the initial
proposal have been made by parties interested in submitting
• proposals;
3. This addendum no. 1 to the request for proposal is
r,
U
expressly made a part of and is included in the request for
proposal previously issued and except as noted below, does not
alter, change, extend or modify any of the terms of the request for
proposal.
YOU AND rACH OF YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. Containers. Residents of the City of Hutchinson shall
not be required to use a specific form or size of container. Any
size or type of container is permitted during the period of interim
service, with no limitation on the number of containers. Hard
goods and white goods shall also be picked up weekly by the hauler.
1
2, Backyard S Parties serviced under this contract
shall be required only to place their refuse and garbage adjacent
to the home or the garage.
3. Landfill Cha=—es. During the period covered by the
interim service contract, landfill charges shall be the
responsibility of the hauler.
4. Bit ins. The city shall be responsible for billing
cuatomers based on one water meter per residence. if there is more
than one dwelling unit per water meter, up to a maximum of 4
dwelling units, it shall be the responsibility of the hauler to
collect the charges due for hauling services over and above the
base charge for one water meter per dwelling unit.
in all other respects, the request for proposal previously
issued by the City of Hutchinson shall remain in full force and
effect.
Da
1
r
i
i
Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
2
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 9,
1992
-------------------- - - - -
--
WATER & SEWER FUND
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
1,095.64
*US Postmaster
water bills postage
239.11
A & B Electric
prelube wiring control
3,960.00
Am Payment Center
drop box rent
64.00
CAPP
valves
218.14
Citizens Bank
5 savings bonds
250.00
City of Hutch
June medical
2,883.07
City of Hutch
June dental
337.81
Coast to Coast
supplies
640.28
County Market
filters
6.76
Curtin Matheson
lab supplies
148.77
DPC
chemicals
382.70
Ebert, Dick
conference expense
109.30
Erickson More 4
groceries
2.19
Farm & Home
supplies
85.70
Fitzloff Hardware
supplies
54.11
Floor Care
towels
44.30
Fortis Benefits
June LTD
116.44
G & K Services
uniforms
215.34
Gopher State One Call
May service
155.00
Greenbriar
plant- Graham
17.95
Hutch Cenex
fuel & fertilizer
736.82
•
Hutch Leader
recycling
108.80
Hutch Telephone
phone service
394.21
Hutch Wholesale
go jo
25.09
Ideal Shoe Shop
sew belt
20.00
Jerabek Machine
pipe
12.60
Junker
May refuse service
58,887.84
Juul
cement up sewer
88.00
L & P Supply
tractor
3,406.03
Meier, Doug
Vactor training
204.77
Metal Craft
nameplates
391.37
MN Mutual Life Ins
June life ins
49.14
MN Valley Testing
tests
385.25
Nalco Chemical
chemicals
20,949.77
PERA
employer contribution
598.01
Quade Electric
pump repair
174.80
Schramm Implement
blades
26.34
Standard Printing
supplies
26.99
State Treasurer
renewal licenses
30.00
Tri County Water
salt
13.20
US Postmaster
May postage
125.45
VWR Scientific
lab supplies
95.78
Water Env Fed
reg- DeVries
125.00
TOTAL
$97,901.87
•
CENTAL GARAGE FUND
• *Withhold Tax Acct
Brandon Tire
Brandon Tire
Carquest
Carquest
Champion Auto
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Coast to Coast
Farm & Home
Farm & Home
Fitzloff Hardware
Fortis Benefits
G & K Services
Hutch Wholesale
Hutch Wholesale
L & P Supply
MacQueen Equipment
Midwest Machinery
MN Mutual Life Ins
MTI
PERA
Plowman
Schmeling Oil
• US Postmaster
WD Cooling
WD Cooling
Wigen Motor
Wigen Motor
Ziegler
GENERAL FUND
*MN Dept of Rev
*US Postmaster
*DNR
*DNR
*Ranch Restaurant
*Sisseton Sioux RR
*Fairmont
*Withhold
• *Alex Tech
*D.Johnson
*J.Rivers
*Withhold
Opera House
Tax Acct
College
Tax Acct
employer contribution
tire patch
tires
supplies
supplies
parts
June dental
June medical
mailbox
supplies
supplies
handle
June LTD
uniforms
parts
supplies
parts
equip parts
parts
June life ins
assembly
employer contribution
parts
oil
May postage
repair
repairs
repairs
repairs
motor
TOTAL
sales tax
newsletter postage
title fees
registration fees
Sr. tour
92 admissions
92 admissions
employer contribution
registrations
advance
return of seized funds
May excise tax
87.20
11.50
432.50
814.99
106.22
68.98
43.79
345.67
11.78
22.46
18.41
1.99
13.53
48.24
37.39
174.41
17.63
260.47
223.52
5.67
82.50
51.08
29.24
1,233.00
5.80
146.60
770.20
322.00
583.36
250.16
$6,220.29
162.50
213.71
153.00
277.00
667.00
92.00
200.00
6,143.25
150.00
100.00
63.94
28.80
All Seasons
• Allen Office
Anderson Interiors
Automation Supply
Bennett
Bennett Office
Bethke,S.& Great Plains
Big Bear
Bleodel Monument
Bradford, Prochnow
Brandon, Howard
Brandon Tire
Brandon Tire
Breitkreutz, Jeri
Bremix
Brinkman
Brown,A.& Bernhagen Elec
Bulau, Mary
Camera Shop
Carr Flowers
Carter, Ron
Cash Wise
Cellular 2000
Chamber of Commerce
Charles Bailly
City of Hutch
• City of Hutch
Clarey's Equipment
Coast to Coast
Comm of Transportation
Comm of Transportation
Copy Equipment
County Market
County Recorder
County Treasurer
DNR
DNR
Dyna Systems
Eiler, Mark
Englemann, Esther
Ericksons More 4
Fabricare Cleaners
Family Rexall
Farm & Home
Fitzloff Hardware
Fitzloff Hdwe
Floor Care
Fortis Benefits
Four H Program
G & K Services
Glencoe Uniforms
• Gopher Sign
Greenbriar
Guardian Pest
Hallahan, Sue
Heil, Arne
Henry's Foods
plant
supplies
paint
disks
service contract
typewriter, contracts,
housing rehab
parts
services
prof services
volleyball refund
tire repairs
plug tire
summer club refund
concrete & parts
magnifier
housing rehab
fastpitch refund
prints
flowers
safety boots
groceries
phone service
June rent
audit work
June dental
June medical
seal kits
supplies
hangar payment
traffic counts
supplies
supplies
recording fees
DL fees
title fees
reg fees
rivet gun
flowers
Sr.tour refund
groceries
parachute
supplies
supplies
supplies
supplies
supplies
June LTD
workshop
uniforms
uniforms
signs
plants
May service
volleyball refund
mystery tour refund
supplies
supp
29.66
11.42
211.68
37.90
10.00
461.70
128.00
54.00
1,620.00
1,139.80
20.00
24.83
3.00
11.00
150.25
14.95
900.00
18.00
21.46
30.00
30.00
152.96
149.58
408.82
4,700.00
2,680.58
22,093.59
59.00
66.12
700.00
784.00
61.05
9.76
15.00
122.50
53.00
477.00
53.69
90.00
42.00
12.79
5.00
117.70
362.72
72.25
88.06
532.47
972.14
24.00
571.35
495.50
105.06
51.95
19.25
45.00
40.00
84.50
Hoernemann, Michelle
summer club refund
11.00
•
Hutch Ambassadors
Hutch Cenex
signage reimbursement
fuel
1,000.00
3,477.54
Hutch Fire & Safety
inspections
8.90
Hutch Leader
circus ads
231.62
Hutch Leader
ads & notices
594.99
Hutch Plbg & Htg
repairs
343.05
Hutch Telephone
phone service
3,017.07
Hutch Wholesale
supplies
19.92
Hutch Wholesale
supplies
153.71
Ink Spots
paper
122.75
Jayco
aviation fuel
9,751.57
Jerabek Machine
adapter
18.00
Jim's Garden
till garden
85.00
Juul
repair CB
330.00
L & P Supply
oilers & plugs
72.04
Land Care Equipment
tractor
2,996.50
Larson, Mary
shelter refund
20.00
League of MN Cities
wrap up session
25.00
LETN
June service
288.00
Mangan, Connie
mileage
52.92
Marco
typewriter repair
95.38
Martin, Greg
soccer coach
262.63
McGarvey Coffee
coffee
54.90
McLeod Coop Powr
electricity
668.71
Merrill, Ken
Logis meeting
16.88
•
Mid MN Hot Mix
MN City /Cty Mgnt
sand
dues
260.75
55.00
MN Mutual Life
June life
394.17
MN Rec & Park
3 registrations
51.00
Mr.Movies
movie rental
2.28
MSF
sanctioning fees
40.00
Olson's Locksmith
lock repair
40.80
Otto, Lyla
Sr.tour refund
42.00
PERA
employer contribution
6,708.49
PERA -DCP
employer contribution
28.71
Performance Comp
forms
178.63
Peterson, Lyndon
Sr.Prom music
75.00
Plaza Hdwe
supplies
23.50
PPCT Mgnt Systems
kick bags
99.34
Public Safety Equip
beacons
75.94
Quade Electric
electrical parts
195.85
Quast, Julie
swim refund
30.00
Schlueter, Bernett
Sr.tour refund
42.00
Schmeling, Brent
softball refund
25.00
Schmeling 0I1
oil
117.38
Schramm, Violet
Sr.tour refund
42.00
Schramm Implement
blades
52.66
Sewing Basket
emblems
14.10
Shoutz, Mark
expense
100.00
Sitz, Hazel
Logis meeting
32.40
Sorensen Farm
rental
50.50
•
Standard Printing
paper & supplies
960.55
Star Cablevision
June service
4.07
Streichers
lock head & clipboards
74.40
Stritesky, Marjorie
mystery tour refund
20.00
Studer, Mike
safety boots
30.00
Swanson, Evan
softball refund
25.00
Templeton
May contribution
324.59
• Thran, Esther
Sr.tour refund
42.00
Tri County Water
salt
79.20
Two Way Communications
microphone
210.00
UBC
supplies
426.33
Up & Away Balloons
balloons
20.00
US Postmaster
May postage
645.72
Velkov, Vera
camp refund
32.00
Victorian Inn
room - Gerebi
42.26
Witte Sod
sod
6.75
Wm Mueller
sand
166.16
Xerox
contract payment
329.80
TOTAL $85,431.65
•
•
BOND FUNDS
RURAL FIRE DEPT
Coast to Coast supplies 1.38
Farm & Home parts 62.22
Hutch Cenex fuel 142.56
TOTAL $206.16
YOUTH CENTER
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
87.97
Fortis Benefits
June LTD
11.10
MN Mutual Life Ins
June life ins
4.62
City of Hutch
June medical
154.46
City of Hutch
June dental
15.64
US Postmaster
May postage
2.03
PERA
employer contribution
51.52
Hutch Telephone
phone services
28.63
Star Cablevision
cable service
22.45
Hutch Leader
advertising
36.92
Jude Candy
supplies
119.40
US Toy
supplies
69.59
Viking Coca Cola
supplies
206.01
TOTAL
$810.34
• 1990 TAX INC CONST
LTP Enterprises abandonment of well 150.00
Winkelman Bldg const of bldg 13,500.00
TOTAL $13,650.00
1992 TAX INC CONST
*Hutch Farm Service purchase of property 80,758.35
*McLeod Cty Recorder state deed tax - Jannousek 132.00
County Recorder recording deed 15.00
McLeod Title recording mortgages 45.00
TOTAL $80,950.35
BONDS OF 1991
Quam Construction est #6 21,050.40
Annandale Contracting est #7 3,175.20
Wm Mueller est #4,5,6 35,312.98
TOTAL $59,538.58
BONDS OF 1992 CONST
Duininck Bros est #1 6,596.80
Wm Mueller est #1 51,357.28
•
TOTAL $57,954.08
DAVID ".ARNOLD
•OAHY D. M<DOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O.EARRT ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOOE
IACRA R. FRETLAND
DAVID A. HRDEOOFMANN
PADL D- DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES II EY
RICHARD O. MCOEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSRI
MARY E. HORROCRS
CATHRYN D.REHER
•
May 28, 1992
A13NOLD & McDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
IOl PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Sam Ulland Matter
Our File No. 3244-87011
OF CO NSE1
WILLIAM W. CAMEHON
RAYMOND C. LALLIEH
PAOL M- BEOICH
CHARLES H.CAR_HICH L-
SE61 CEDAR LAEE ROAD
MINNEAPO LI9, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE BOO -34.3 -4165
7AX(6@)545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369 -2214
FAR (612) 389 -5506
EY Cb,
Sl4l�
Dear Gary:
Enclosed please find a Notice of Filing Order and an Order
dismissing all matters relative to Mr. Ulland. Please include this
in the next Council packet.
I believe with your receipt of this judgment, this matter has now
been fully resolved.
Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
PLNOLD & Mc WELL
Bar? Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
- CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE EAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA
• COUNTY OF McLEOD
--------------- -- - --
Sam Ulland,
Plaintiff,
0
C�
VS.
The City of Hutchinson,
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
----------- ------ ----- ------ ---- -- -- -- - - --
NOTICE OF FILING ORDER
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------- ------- - - - - --
TO: PLAINTIFF SAM ULLAND, P.O BOX 157, WINSTED, MN 55395:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the Order attached herto as Exhibit A
was signed on May 19, 1992 and was filed in the above - mentioned
matter with the Court Administrator on May 19, 1992.
Dated: PUSTORINO, PEDERSON, TILTON
6 PARRINGTON
By *
MARY P. �REEHY, #216 7J
Attorneys for City o Hutchinson
4005 West 65th Street, #200
Minneapolis, MN 55435
(612) 925 -3001
l
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HcLEOD
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
r�
L
Sam Ulland,
Plaintiff, Court Pilo: 21781
vs. ORDE 6 JUDGMENT
The City of Hutchinson, MN,
Defendant.
------ -- -- --- --- -- -- ----- -- ---- - - - - --
The above - entitled matter came on for hearing on the 19th day
of MAY , 1992, before The Honorable Richard J. Henke
of the above -named Court on a motion by Defendant The City of
Hutchinson for an Order.dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint for
failure to state to a claim upon which relief can be granted, or
alternatively, summary judgment. •
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in hereby
granted.
2) Plaintiff's Complaint is, and all things, dismissed with
prejudice.
LET JDDGHENT BE ENTERED FORTHWITH.
Dated at Glencoe, Minnesota , thin 19th day of May
1992.
Hono able Richer J. Menke
Judge of Distric Court
•
RUM IT 66JI.-a
June 3, 1992
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT l,Aw
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
MP. Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Phase II Development
Our File: 3244 -91046
(612) 587 -7575
FAX (612) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
OF COONSEL
WILLIAM W.CAMERON
RAYMOND C. IdII IER
PADL M.BEOICH
CHAHLES R.CARMICHAEL"
reel CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAIbLIS, MINNESOTA 554L6
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-34.'I -4545
FA (6W)545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369 -2214
FAA (612) 369 -5506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
jum i59� v
RECEIVED
BY �/
Dear Gary:
I thought I would drop you a note for inclusion in the next council
packet regarding the status of this matter.
As you may recall, a meeting was held between Erickson's Diversified
Corporation, Everest Development Group and representatives of the City
to discuss various issues in connection with the Phase II Development.
One of the issues that came up had to do with the condominium agreement
between the -City of Hutchinson and Erickson's.
As I pointed out, under the agreement, although it is a hypothetical
and unlikely to occur problem, it is possible that at some future date,
the City could be pushed out of its condominium space and under compen-
sated for the space since the agreement provid6s that Eric ksow s is
required to pay the original price as compensation.
In other words, again speaking hypothetically, on the 14th anniversary
of the closing, Erickson's could require the City to move from the
space (although, under the present agreement, this would effectively
be the second expansion), and the compensation due the City would be
the amount paid by the City at the time of the initial transaction.
That may, or may not, be a fair price depending upon the status of the
• commercial real estate markets at that time. In fact, there are a
•CZHTTEI D AS A CIVIL THLAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
DAVID B. An OIL
•OAHY
D. MCDOWEI
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. HARRT ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOOE
LAURA K.FRETLAND
DAVID A- BRUEODEMANN
PAUL D- DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PA EMENT
JAMES UTLEY
RICHARD O. NcOEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSEI
MARY E. HOHROCES
CATHRYN D.REHER
June 3, 1992
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT l,Aw
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
MP. Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Phase II Development
Our File: 3244 -91046
(612) 587 -7575
FAX (612) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
OF COONSEL
WILLIAM W.CAMERON
RAYMOND C. IdII IER
PADL M.BEOICH
CHAHLES R.CARMICHAEL"
reel CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAIbLIS, MINNESOTA 554L6
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-34.'I -4545
FA (6W)545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369 -2214
FAA (612) 369 -5506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
jum i59� v
RECEIVED
BY �/
Dear Gary:
I thought I would drop you a note for inclusion in the next council
packet regarding the status of this matter.
As you may recall, a meeting was held between Erickson's Diversified
Corporation, Everest Development Group and representatives of the City
to discuss various issues in connection with the Phase II Development.
One of the issues that came up had to do with the condominium agreement
between the -City of Hutchinson and Erickson's.
As I pointed out, under the agreement, although it is a hypothetical
and unlikely to occur problem, it is possible that at some future date,
the City could be pushed out of its condominium space and under compen-
sated for the space since the agreement provid6s that Eric ksow s is
required to pay the original price as compensation.
In other words, again speaking hypothetically, on the 14th anniversary
of the closing, Erickson's could require the City to move from the
space (although, under the present agreement, this would effectively
be the second expansion), and the compensation due the City would be
the amount paid by the City at the time of the initial transaction.
That may, or may not, be a fair price depending upon the status of the
• commercial real estate markets at that time. In fact, there are a
•CZHTTEI D AS A CIVIL THLAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
June 3, 1992
Page 2 •
number of commercial properties that are worth less today than they
were worth many years ago when those projects were completed.
Nonetheless, this does raise the potential for an unfair situation
for either party, and in view of the expansion of the building, the
liklihood of being able to expand the liquor store on site is probably
nil. This means that any expansion will be off site.
This raises two issues.
First, with respect to the development agreement, it would be my re-
commendation that the agreement be amended along the lines of our
discussion in the course of our meeting last week. As you may recall,
the discussion centered around any expansion after the eight year mark.
This would mean that up to eight years, Erickson's could aquire the
space by giving the appropriate 18 month notice (18 months prior to the
5th and 8th anniversaries respectively) in exchange for payment to the
City of $275,000.00. Thereafter, Erickson's could aquire the property,
but would be required to pay the City a fair market value as determined
by an as yet undesignated appraisal method.
This would mean that if no 18 month-notice is given at the 6 112 year
mark, no notice could be given until 18 months prior to the 11th
anniversary and in the latter case, the City's interest in the properto
would be evaluated and paid based on the then existing fair market
value.
Please note this may work to the advantage of the City or, conceivably,
could work to the disadvantage of the City, but on a fair market basis,
presumhbly the City would be able to use those funds to build`an equiv-
alent municipal liquor Store elsewhere.
I would recommend formulation much like the one outlined above. I am
anticipating we will receive language from Everest and I will forward
it to the city council when received. In the interim, I would suggest
that this information be provided to the council for its review and
consideration, although not necessarily any action, at the next regularly
scheduled city council meeting.
The second issue that this creates is the question of what to do with
the space adjacent to the Shopko site. In view of at-least the remote
possibility of expansion, and in view of the fact that the existing -
space is probably not well suited for any other obvious use, it would
be my recommendation that the existing land be "banked" at least for
a few years so that the needs of the community could be better evaluated.
This is a policy question and, as always, a question for the council to
determine.
F_ 1
U
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
June 3, 1992
• Page 3
Please do not hbsitate to contact me should you have any questions in
connection with any of the foregoing.
Thank yon. Best personal regards.
Very trul
ARNOLD &
G. Barry
GBA:srm
0
•
•DAVID B. ARNOLD
DARY D. Mc MN EL.
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. BODE
LDRA S. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEDOEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE —
JOSEPH N.PAIRMENT
JAMES UTLEY
RICHARD O. MCOEE
TIMOTHY M. FAFINSEI
)IABY E. HORROCES
CATHRYN D. HEHER
AiRNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
Mr. William A. Moeller
Gislason, Dosland,
Hunter & Malecki
State and Center Streets
P.O. Box 458
New Ulm, Mn. 56073
(612) 587 -7575
FA% (617) 567 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
June 1, 1992
Re: Word of Life Christian Outreach
• Your File No. 13774 -001
Our File No. 3188 -91193
Dear Bill:
Or CO".ZL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C.LALLER
PAUL X.BEOICH
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL"
S CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESOTA 55416
(SIR) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 600 -34.7 -4545
FAE(612) 545 -1)93
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON,M S 55371
(612) 369 -9714
FA (612) 369 -5506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
P- -,�
JUrI;IA2
N
RECEIVED
C LJ
c-
Thank you for your letter of May 21, 1992 which was an effort to
explain the entire transaction from the standpoint of your client.
I met with Rev. Hall and we discussed at some length the entire
history of this matter.
As you have requested, I have provided the City Council a copy of
your letter, as well as a copy of this correspondence. I can
assure you the City considers this matter resolved and a closed
chapter.
The point that was of some concern had to do with the "non
assumability" issue; I have advised the Council, and I will advise
you, that at no time did Word of Life make a formal commitment that
such a clause was to be included in any agreement. I believe there
was an underlying assumption in that regard, but at the time those
discussions were taking place, it appeared that the property was
going to be improved by Word of Life.
In any event, this matter has now been resolved and with receipt
of the payment called for under the agreement, there should be no
further need for any action on the part of either your office or
this office.
- CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TELL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE RAE ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR AHBOCLTION
Mr. William Moeller
June 1, 1992
Page 2
Thank you for taking the time to write. Best personal regards.
CC Gary D. Plotz
•
0
•
LAW OFFICES
GISLASON, DOSLAND, HUNTER S9 MALECPEI
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFE551ONAL ASSOCIATION
SIDNEY P. GISLABON 11908-1985,
C. ALLEN DOSLAND
DONALD F. HUNTER. P. Al
JAMES H. MALECKI
DANIEL A. GISLASON
ROBERT M. HALVORSON'
C. THOMAS WILSON
JOHN C. HOTTINGER
DAVID D. ALSOP
RUTH ANN WEBSTER
BARRYG.VERMEER
GARY W. KOCH' �
WILLIAM A. MOELLER•
TIMOTHY ►_ TOBIN'
KURT D. JOHNSON
ROGER H. GROSS
REPLY TO
New Ulm
NEW ULM OFFICE
STATE AND CENTER STREETS
P.O. Box 458
NEW ULM. MINNESOTA 56073
TELEPHONE: 507 384 -3111
TELECOPIER_ 507 354 -5447
MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE
OPUSCKHTER •VITEI 6[
M.A. [.PT
MINNETONMA•MINN[.OTA 50243-2907
MANKATO OFFICE
ICE [. HICKORY
.Y T[ SOO
M. NM.TO. MIM N[00T. .[002'21[]
May 21, 1992
Mr. Barry Anderson
Attorney at Law
101 Park Place
• Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2563
Re: Word of Life -- City of Hutchinson
Your File No. 3188 -91193
Our File No. 13774 -001
Dear Barry:
DAVID W. STURGES•
R. STEPHEN TILLITT
MARK S. ULLERY
REED H. GLAWE'
WADE R. WACHOLZ
BEVERLY BABCOCK KRANZ
JEFF C. BRAEGELMANN
NOEL L. PHIFER
LAURA L. MYSLIS
ANDREW A. WILLAERT
DANIEL A. BECKMAN
ANNE T. JOHNSON
ELLIOT L. OLSEN
LISA J. MALL- NIESEN-
CAROLE L. ISAKHON
DAWN R. SCHI[FELSEIN
First of all, I am happy and relieved that we finally
have an agreement regarding the Word of Life Outreach Property.
My file reflects that the first meetings conducted on this matter
were over a year ago. I am sure it is a relief for all sides to
finally have the matter closed.
I just wanted to write to provide some additional
information to the council members. I know that when the matter
regarding this property was voted on, there was some concern by
the mayor and another council member that Word of Life had been
deceitful by claiming that they had not purchased the interest in
this property for speculation purposes. The statements made that
the property is now up for sale is absolutely correct. However,
I want to provide factual background from Word of Life's
prospective and hope that members of the Council will come to
realize that this was not the intention at the outset.
• The Council first voted to abate the assessments when
Word of Life had one day left to exercise their right to
repurchase. In attempting to do so, they were informed by Ed
Eide that they needed a letter of abatement from council dealing
Attorneys also admitted In 'Iowa 'Wisconsin r Illlnols 4 North Dakota
GISLASON, DOSLANII, HUNTER & MALECKI
PA13E 2 •
Mr. Barry Anderson
May 21, 1992
with the special assessments. It was their firm belief that had
they not gotten that letter at the time when they did, their
right to repurchase would have expired. Word of Life greatly
appreciated the quick action taken by the City. Mayor Ackland
expressed his belief that the assessments were not due in the
first year. I personally think that is incorrect, but the
information conveyed by Ed Eide at that time was that assessments
would be due absent a letter of abatement. It certainly was
reasonable, I believe, to rely upon Mr. Eide's statements.
After the letter of abatement was issued, I met with
You and Mayor Ackland and John Milinar on May 7. At that time,
we tried to reach an agreement regarding the rate of interest to
be paid and the period of time over which it was to be paid.
However, both Mayor Ackland and Dave Milinar made a very strong
expression at that meeting that they would never approve use of
that property for school purchases. They were well aware that
Word of Life wanted to build both a church and a school on those •
lands. I remember someone saying that they would express this at
a Council meeting. They knew that although any such expression
would not be binding on future councils, they wanted all future
councils to know that they took this action and expressly stated
they were opposed to having the land used for a school as well as
a church.
This put Word of Life in a very difficult position.
They had hoped in the future to be able to build a school on the
land in conjunction with a church. However, they fully
recognized the strong opposition and knew that there was a
substantial likelihood that they could build a church and have
the council refuse to allow a school to be built at some time in
the future.
Pastor Jim Hall then consulted with another minister
who he respects regarding this dilemma. He was counseled at that
time that if other land was available that could be used for both
church and school purposes, it would be best for all concerned
(the city as well as Word of Life) if Word of Life looked
elsewhere for their church and school combination. With
negotiations on this repayment of special assessments taking a
rather extended period, Word of Life felt it was best to heed
that advice. They are presently looking for a site that the city
would recognize could be used for both church and school •
purposes. They have one very strong possibility at this time,
but have not finalized any deals. It is clear that Word of Life
will not be able to own two pieces of property, build a church,
GISLASON, DOSLAND, HUNTER & MALECKI
• PAGE j
Mr. Barry Anderson
May 21, 1992
and build a school. Consequently, a tentative decision has been
made to sell their property.
I can assure you with total candor that from the first
time that I discussed the issue of taxes and special assessments
with them, they were firmly committed to using this property to
build a church and school. They hung on to that position as long
as they felt that this was a realistic possibility. However,
with the Council expressing strong disfavor regarding the school,
there really seemed to be no other alternative but to sell the
property. The property was never bought simply for resale. It
was bought to build a church and school. Now, they have come to
realize that this may very well be impossible on that site given
the city's position.
I wish that you would share this letter with Mayor
Ackland and the council members. It is not Word of Life's desire
• to create any animosity with the City Council nor create any
problems for anyone else coming in wanting to repurchase
property. We hope that you can recognize and appreciate the
difficult dilemma and decision that this created for Word of
Life.
I want to thank you and the council for finalizing the
agreement. I look forward to receipt of the agreement for Word
of Life's signature.
Sincerely,
W)-� a- O
William A. Moeller
WAM:cw
CC. Jim Hall
g 0, yv ,
T �O
wI 4o d,s(,oss S
Lots of smart telecommunications people thought the cable
companies were dinosaurs that would be overrun
W; the telephone companies. But look who's overrunning whom.
fOR YOUR IIV"ORMATI 0!y
Cable's secret weapon
By George Gilder
IMAGINE that you're watching a film
just ordered up over one of a cable
television system's dozens of pay-per-
view channels. The phone rings, but
you don't reach for the phone. You
reach for the Tv remote control unit.
Hitting the pail /mute button to
stop and silence the film, you take the
call through the remote unit, which
has become a wireless portable phone.
Your phone bill next month bears the
name not of the local phone company
but of your local cable company.
The CATv companies taking on the
hone companies? Wasn't it supposed
o be the other way around? Weren't
the well- heeled telephone companies
going to be the innovators that would
Jay fiber -optic wires and deliver mov-
ies, newspapers, bill paying, banking
and other two -way video services to
American homes, and drive the cable
companies to the wall?
So a lot of people, this writer in-
cluded, thought. We were wrong.
One of the most significant tele-
communications deals occurred on
Feb. 18. That's when Tele- Commu-
nications Inc., the country's largest
cable operator (see rablr, p. 84),
agreed to buy 49% of Teleport Com-
munications Group, Inc. from Merrill
Lynch; the balance will be held by
another cable firm, privately owned
Cox Entcprises, Inc. Teleport has
built up a 5100- million -a -year busi-
ness by interconnecting major build-
ings and corporations with fiber -optic
cable and linking customers to other
phone nerworks — thereby often by-
passing the local telephone compa-
u and their exorbitant switching
argcs.
Teleport, in short, brings Ter and
Cox into direct competition with lo-
cal phone companies in providing
data transmission services to major
corporations. With phone company
data service revenue rising some six
times faster than voice service rcvc-
nue, TCl and Cox will be using Tele-
port to attack the phone companies in
one of their most profitable areas.
This wasn't the first incursion by a
Cn1v company onto telephone com-
pany turf, and it certainlywon't be the
last. As Tv market development man-
ager of fiber -optic cablcmaker Cor-
ning Inc., Jon Chester knows some-
thing about the strategies and ambi-
tions of the various telecommum-
cations competitors. "The cable ry
industry," says Chester, "is changing
from being a video entertainment
source to being a full- service telecom-
munications supplier."
The cable ry companies already
enjoy a substantial lead over the tele-
phone companies in the race to put
smart wires into U.S. households.
Currently, 60 out of every 100 Ameri-
can homes arc hooked up to cable Tv;
another 33 can easily be hooked up.
By contrast, the telephone companies
have pushed their wires into 93% of
U.S. households.
But those penetration figures arc
misleading. What matters is not the
quantity of wire but its quality—how
much data can be passed through the
wires, and how easily. On this score,
the cable Tv companies are far out in
Fiber -optic
cable
Tins Warner's Al cable -
mft Is Itufal ft cable 9ks thle to
deltvw 160 cable stations to booms In
New•York's Queens bomgb.
front of the telephone companies.
The arteries of a cable Tv system arc
the coaxial cables that run from the
center of the system, the so -called
headend, out to subscribers' homes.
Over long distances, coaxial cable is
not a very efficient conduit of elcc-
tronic impulses; it is far inferior to
fiber -optic cable. About every quar-
ter -mile, coaxial cable requires an am-
plifier to boost the signal and com-
pensatc for resistance on the line.
These amplifiers create electronic
noise and virtually prohibit effrcicnt
two -way communications on coaxial
cable. Because of this limitation, most
pay -per -view cATv systems and the
various shopping channels depend
upon both cable and telephone com-
panies: Customers see the video pro-
gramming via cable, but they order
films or merchandise over the phone.
Over short distances, however, co-
axial cable is a highly cffrcicnt data
conduit. Over stretches of 300 feet or
less into the home, coaxial cable re-
quires no amplifiers. Thus, across the
so- called drop —thc distance from the
80 Forbes is April 13, 1992
General
Instrument's
Remote'N Phone
itch Wkalaas
phone /remote
enrt- - unit trill
ariaw couch pots•
toes to take and
make catb Ovono
tltak cable yw
tam tNteat leav-
led tlra eaack.
curbside ca-
ble into the fiving
room — coaxial cable can
now handle as much data as fiber -
optic cable, and far more than phone
companies' conventional twisted -pair
copper wires can transmit.
In telecommunications industry
jargon, coaxial cable over short dis-
tanccs is what is called a "broadband
pipe " —a conduit through which
huge amounts of data can flow at
enormous speed. Through a broad-
band pipe, for example, the entire
contents of the Library of Congress
could flow in under eight hours. To
send the same quandty of information
by modem over a conventional tele-
phone line would require 500 years.
To get a bit technical, information
moves through air or through metal
or glass cables in waves. Cable capaci-
ty is measured in frequency or band-
width: the numberofwaves (orhertz)
passing through the line per second.
Current, in -place coaxial cable sys-
tcros have a potential bandwidth of I
billion hertz (1 gigahertz). Compare
this with the 4,000 hertz (4 kilohertz)
capacity of current twisted -pair phone
company wires.
The point is this: The telephone
companies' existing narrowband cop-
per wire links to homes can normally
hold only voice and data. But cATV's
coaxial broadband links to the home
can act as conduits for billions of bits
of full- motion digital video, high -
resolution medical images, vivid edu-
cational simulations and lifelike vid-
coconfcrcnces. Comparing the two
wives is like comparing a five -car ferry
with an tight -lane bridge.
Here's an example of what con-
sumers can already receive through
the cable operators' broadband pipes:
Through a service called X'press,
from Tci spinoff Liberty Media Inc.,
cable subscribers can plug their per-
sonal computers into their CATV sys-
tem's coaxial cable outlet and receive
a huge flow of digitized data. Sup-
pose, for example, you want to know
what is being written about IBM and
where the stock closed. Using soft -
warc from X'press, you
i► set your com-
puter to rune
in this news from a
data flood pouring in over
your cable line from 35 news wires.
Likewise for stock quotes, movie re-
views, weather reports, horoscopes
and a great deal else.
Gcrald Bennington, president of
X•press, says the service is designed
primarily for computer users in the
home, not office, and is priced ac-
cordingly: from $4.95 per month for
a Prodigy -like service, with weather
reports and stock quotes, to around
$25 per month for a wider variety of
services, including more sophisticated
investment news. Ultimately, some
experts believe X'press will be able to
keep pace with centralized on -line
database services like Dow Jones or
Dialog at a fraction of the price.
Haven't the telephone companies
installed much more fiber -optic cable
than the cable companies? Yes, they
have. But the cable companies are
increasing their base more rapidly.
cATV fiber mileage has doubled every
year since 1988, and will hit 22,000
miles by year-end. While telephone
companies today devote around 7% of
their investment budget to fiber op-
tics, the cable industry invests more
like 15% of its capital budget in fiber.
More important, the cable compa-
nies get more bang for every mile of
fiber they lay. Look at the diagram on
page 82. Traditionally, cATv systems
have expanded using a tree -and-
branch structure: A single coaxial
trunk cable is laid starting at the head -
end; tributary cables run off this trunk
line into neighborhoods.
Recently, however, the most ad-
vanced cable operators have been
breaking up their tree- and - branch
systems into what are called "star"
configurations. In a star configura-
tion, the operator installs separate
fiber -optic lines from the cable head -
end at the center of the star to neigh-
borhood A. Once there, the broad-
band fiber -optic cable can connect
into the existing broadband
coaxial pipes serving a
few hundred of
neighbor- 'Tt
hood A's home.
Then the operator moves .
on to neighborhood B and so on,'
financing each phase of the upgrading
as he proceeds, without serious inter-
ruption to the existing service.
Remember coaxial cable's Achilles'
heel —all those amplifiers needed to
boost the signal over long distances?
By installing fiber -optic cables from
the cable headend to clusters of
homes and tying the fiber into the
neighborhood coaxial system, the ca-
Forbes a April 13,1992 81
11
•
M
Cable
blc operator can deliver a data -rich 1-
gigahertz signal using just a few —or
.even no— amplifiers. Eliminating
those amplifiers opens the network
for two -way traffic that can be
switched at the cable system's head -
end, like a phone system -
Now compare the cable operator's
position with that of the telephone
companies. To achieve the same level
of service upgrade, the telephone
company would have to make the
same investment in fiber trunk lines—
and it would have to make an addi-
tional, and heavy, investment in re-
placing its 4- Hohertz copper wire
Links into customers' homes and of-
fices. As long as the twisted -pair cop-
per connections remain, phone com-
pany fiber does not substantially im-
prove the bandwidth of service to the
home. To put it another way: There's
no point in sending a tidal wave of
information down a broadband fiber
•
line and into the neck of a tiny bottle.
In short, a cable system can turn
itself into a supplier ofa wide range of
broadband services, including wire-
less phone and computer video, at
relatively light cost. According to
American Television & Communica-
tions Corp., Time Warner's primary
(4 -6 million subscribers) cable opera-
tion, the trunks- and - feeders part of a
cable network makes up only 19% of
the financial value of cable- installed
base. Remaining in place arc the most
expensive parts of the cable system —
those broadband coaxial pipelines
from neighborhood hub to home.
Thcsc lines comprise 75% of the dollar
value of cnTv plant. (The other 6% is
the headend or the central communi-
ty organization point.) This high cost
of installing new broadband links to
the home is why ATc Senior Vice
President James Chiddix says: "We
[in the U.S. cable industry] have spent
By aslsg fteraptfe cable to rKaaflpua awk tree•aad-braaelr eoaxi.
•alt Me arddtectures ( above) late "der- networks (below), cable
operators an do away with mod of a sysbs's noisy anWW%m wW9
bavlaj costly fiks to Ste hoses in ptaa.
the last four decades putting a broad-
band transmission medium into the
local loop. That is an exceedingly
difficult thing for potential compcti-
tors to replicate."
In December ATc rolled out the
country's most ambitious fiber -based
cable system, in Queens, in New
York. In the fast phase, available now
to some 10,000 Queens households
served by new fiber -optic trunk lines,
Time Warner offers 150 channels.
These include 90 conventional cable
channels —m-rv, Discovery, ESPN and
the like —and 60 pav- per -view movie
channels over which it sells films at
prices from $1.95 to $4.95 each.
Price for this greatly expanded stan-
dard service: $23.95 a month —no
more than basic cable.
But this is merely a first step. Tune
Warner plans to push is fiber -optic
cables still deeper into the neighbor-
hood, and to transform the system
from one based on the flow of infor-
mation in analog form —like the
waves found in nature--to one based
on digitized information bits.
What will that mean for ATc and its
subscribers? More choice for sub-
scribers, more revenues for Time
Warmer. Says Chiddix: "We'll be able
to provide a different mix of 200
digital channels to each group of 500
homes. This should be sufficient ca-
pacity, when combined with 75 chan-
nels of basic `broadcast' services, to
allow us to provide individually
switched video to individual homes."
When that happens, probably with-
in the next four years, the age of
narrowcast information will have tru-
ly arrived. "Individually switched vid-
co" means the individual viewer tells
the programming vendor what he or
she wants to see and when, rather than
tuning in based on a vendor's sched-
ule. With individually switched video
in place, one parent, say, might partic-
ipate in an interactive college reunion
teleconference; another parent might
watch a basketball game between her
alma mater and an obscure rival; a
teenager might study physics with a
Caltech professor, while another un-
dcrgoes diagnostic tests for a tom
knee with a specialist across the coun-
try. All simultaneously.
Science fiction? Based on Tune
Warner's work, other cable company
ventures and scores of phone compa-
82 Forbes a April 13, 1992
American
Televislon d
Communication's
James Chiddix
Waling on
htmhdnally
ew ft&ad video:
YooracUre pro-
gramrrdng when
the Consumer
Ramte k, mot
whom Ow woodor
eelo4rNe k
try experiments across the country,
individually switched video for mil-
lions of Americans will be widely
available before the end of the decade.
As they move closer toward out-
right competition with the telephone
companies, the relatively lightly regu-
lated cable companies enjoy another
advantage over the rich- but- regulat-
ed phone companies: They are still
mostly run by the innovative entrc-
prcneurs who built most of the big
GTV firms, people like Tcr's John
Malone and Cablevision Systems'
Charles Dolan. Indeed, it was because
these entrepreneurs responded quick-
ly to competitive threats like direct
broadcast satellite television and vid-
eo stores in the 1980s that the cnry
industry has invested so heavily in
upgrading is systems.
Congress and the tours continue
to hobble the telephone companies
on the grounds that they are local
monopolies. Thus the phone compa-
nies generally cannot own able fran-
chises in their own service areas, nor
have they been allowed, until recent-
ly, to get into electronic publishing.
This plays nicely into the able cntre-
prcneurs' hands, giving them time to
explore parts of the telephone busi-
ness beforc the companies can get
into their business.
For example, Tci is partnering with
McCaw Cellular to develop wireless
phone service using cable. Using Tct's
LEFT.
John Malone of TCI
BELOW:
X' press' Gera b
Bennington
TC1 planff
Uberty Media's
x•preee: using
coaxial eahlee
m feed tome
oo I - With
tewdor and odor
tefermaflaa for
fib motttldp.
broadband links, McCaw can connect
lightweight cordless phones to the
cellular hub and from there to the
local and long distance phone net-
works. It's a nifty sharing of resources.
McCaw, which used to be in cable,
provides the phone service, marketing
and billing; Tet (whose John Malone
is on McCaw's board) supplies the
vital broadband connections neces-
sary to carry the signals from scores of
wireless phones possibly clustering at
unpredictable places.
Another big able company, Ralph
Roberts' Comast Corp., has been
investing in cellular telephones since
1988. On Mai. 5 this year, Comcast
plunked down another $1 billion to
Forbes ■ April 13, 1992 83
i
•
O
Cable
Tek{amnunintlans lnc' 11 3 f1540E 95 b xT.67E ,r ' S9 7 r , j.16 a r 22 8 Tunier Broadcating, Deeway
sJ k ; • ,Channel OK cable systems
Time blamer Inc 6.7 "- i 2630 39 24.50 88 106 A } 193 , 66 Tiaric Broadcasting, Whittle Cam -
4ti niratkta, E! Entertainment Channel
fCarcast torpaatlon' 2.8 - 309 92 - 2.40 ° 1 7 16 }9 r� OYC Tw4r Broadcasfing,'-f#--Q 64
UK cable .sYs[erns Ara 10tZZ4A
k Jars InEenu6le+ s 1 7, 49, ( 100 4.00 0.3 12 1 6 -- Nwre r- vab uq OC 1ioqa
Cader!slm Sts ems Corp 16 � - 269 ' 100 , 12.110 , 2,� ' '!<i ":30 ., � 47 x 9 Rembow Pf'a�ammhrg Enterprixs .: ,�r
e ... _.,i:.., Y 4r'f.�e. .K" - n JC'tY>j�r:..R. s- _.--.,
These companies serve half the 55 milllon cable subscribers In do U.S.
buy Philadelphia's nonwirchric ccllu-
lar franchise, thus becoming the fast
U.S. company to own cable and cellu-
lar systems in the same market.
There is cooperation as well as
competition between the cable and
telephone companies. Examples:
■ TO is joining us West and AT &T in a
Denver test of video -on- demand,
supplying the viewer's choice of
2,000 movies within minutes.
■ U.S. phone and cable companies are
omombining to provide a variety of
communications services all over Eu-
rope, where cross - ownership prohibi-
tions do not apply. us West, for exam-
ple, has invested in cable in France,
Hungary, Sweden and Norway, and
has teamed up with TO to supply joint
cable and phone service in the U.K to
2.9 million homes.
■ In Washington's Virginia suburbs,
Cablevision of Loudoun is linking
with Bell Atlantic and innovative
BroadBand Technologies, Inc. ofRa-
leigh, N.C. in an ambitious digital
video trial resembling Time Warner's
plans for Queens. This joint venture
enhances picture quality, provides on-
screen menus and automatically re-
ports line trouble.
Through its fiber and coaxial lines,
the cable industry is also becoming a
force in computer networks, the fast-
est- growing part of the computer in-
dustry. As the computer industry
moves from simple text communica-
tions to images and multimedia, the
telephone companies have often
cd to keep up by offering lines of
ufficient bandwidth to transmit large
amounts of digital data required by
video and graphics.
Digital Equipment Corp. senior
consultant James Albrycht tells a rc-
vealing story. DEC wanted to link its
headquarters with employees' per-
sonal computers at home. DEC decid-
ed to use Ethernet, a fast local area
network system normally confined to
individual buildings. But DEC's local
phone company, Nynex Corp., was
unable to provide the broadband dig-
ital lines Ethernet required.
Stymied by Nynex, Albrycht
turned to his local cable provider,
Cablevision Systems. He discovered
not only that Cablevision's fiber/
coaxial cable network could supply
ample bandwidth between DEC's of-
fices and employees' homes but also
that Cablevision's switching structure
was more suitable for Ethernet than
the telephone company's switching
systems were "It was a simple over-
lay," Albrycht recalls. "We had Eth-
ernet up and running [on Cablevi-
sion's network] in four days."
Under the name of Community
Multimedia Networking, Digital is
planning other networking systems
across the country, using CATV sys-
tems for videoconferencing, video
store- and - forward, file transfers, vid-
eo mail and other value-added tele-
communications services.
Curiously, Wall Street is unim-
pressed by the c ry companies' tech-
nological lead and enormous com-
mercial opportunities. Despite the
strong stock market, most of the pub-
licly owned cable companies arc trad-
ing at sizable discounts from their
1989 highs (see table). Perhaps this is
because investors fear Congress will
decide to re- regulate cable. Or per-
haps it is because the entrepreneurs
who run the cable companies arc less
interested in reported earnings than
in maximizing asset values by borrow-
ing and investing heavily and paying
minimal taxes.
Still, some smart money has been
flowing quietly into cable. In 1990
Forstmann Little & Co. and its limit-
ed partners paid approximately $1.6
billion for General Instrument, the
cable industry's chief supplier of capi-
tal equipment. And last month the
partners at investment bankers Lazard
Freres paid $400 million for 19% of
heavily indebted Continental Ca-
blcvision Inc., a Boston -based opera-
tor with 2.9 million subscribers.
Are the partners at Forstmann and
Lazard right about cable? Impossible
to know. Telecommunications tech-
nology is changing with incredible
speed. The heavily capitalized tele-
phone companies could make a fast
comeback, especially if Congress and
the courts deregulated them. But
Congress fast seems inchncd to add
to cable's regulatory burdens. And
the computer companies —where en-
trepreneurial vitality is high and there
is no regulation —will also arise as
serious competitors in creating digital
information networks.
One thing, however, is already clear.
The telephone, television and com-
puter arc rapidly merging into a single,
very intelligent box —a telecomputer.
This telecomputer will be linked to the
rest of the world by high - capacity
smart wires. As things now stand, the
cable companies have moved these
broadband wires closer to homes and
offices than anyone else. m
84 Forbes a April 13, 1992
• 5/22/92
HUTCHINSON USILI 9 COMMISSION
BALANCE SHEET
APRIL 30, 1992
_
-ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT - AT COST
LAND N LAND RIGHTS
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
_ FUTURE EXPANSION d DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT - GAS RESERVES
MEDICAL INSURANCE
BOND 6 INTEREST PAYMENT 1986
1986 BOND RESERVE
CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
CASH IN BANK
INVESTMENTS 6 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INVENTORIES
PREPAID INSURANCE
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE
TREASURY BILL DISCOUNT
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
DEFERRED CHARGE
BOND DISCOUNT 1986
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE
TOTAL ASSETS
PAGE 1
w w w w TOTAL • +� +� w
790,012.25
26,740,831.64
27,530,643.89
(14,281,310.24)
(14,281,310.24)
1,569,302.40
1,569,302.40
14,818,836.05
6,353,000.00
1,569,500.00
100,000.00
300,776.29_
392,000.00
750,000.00
9,465,276.29
2,548,471.06
81,954.18
1,403,713.82
562,253.96
62,521.27
237,636.61
55,404.33
4,951,955.23
48,323.91
48,323.91
29,284,391.48
I�
(
I,(
1
'C i
�( c
(
(
c
I
(
5/22/92 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION PAGE 2 C
BALANCE SHEET
APRIL 30, 1992
w w w w TOTAL w w w w
Ir
.. -_- _.. ... _ MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIABILITIES
MUNICIPAL EQUITY - --
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
_... -_ UNAFFROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY
LONG TERM LIABILITIES -NET OF
CURRENT MATURITIES
1986 BONDS
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
CONSTR CONTRACTS 8 ACCTS PAY RETAIN
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION A ACCTS PAY
- CURRENT A ACCRUED LIABILITIES
NOTE PAYABLE - LEASE PAYABLE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
INTEREST ACCRUED
ACCRUED PAYROLL
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND
CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
OTHER C'UR'RENT 8 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIAB
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY A LIAR
25,392,088.94
852,188.16
(156,250.00)
26,088,027.10
r
2,165,000.00
_
2,165,000.00
-
(
.00
1,517.28
773,677.59
45,006.91 _ -____
49.823.66
109,467.46
r(
-
(3,736.78)
56,542.86
-
(934.60)
'( $
1,031,364.38
-
(
29,284,391.48
J(
�C
1
L
r t (.
5/22/92 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF INCOME & EXPENSES
APRIL 30, 1992
- - - - -- - - -- - - - - _
PREVIOUS CURRENT --- BUDGETED
YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE
PAGE 1
BUDGET
DEVIATION
r
ANNUAL
BUDGET i
INCOME STATEMENT
OPERATING REVENUE
SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY
3,OB9,125.55
3,050,758.04
3,151,640.00
(100,801.96)
915071800.00
SALES FOR RESALE
120.00
210.00
.00
210.00
5,000.00
NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES
20,607.13
22,114.77
6,951.08
15,163.69
38,461.54___
SECURITY LIGHTS
4,310.00
4,27B.00
5,100.00
(B22.00)
15,000.00
-
POLE RENTAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
4,000.00
SALES - GAS
2,167,893.19
1,584,614.13
2,227,150-00
(642,535.87)
4,500,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
5,282,055.87
4,661,974.94
5,390,941.08
(728,866.14)
14,070,261.54
OPERATING EXPENSES
-
PRODUCTION OPERATION
177,666.38
179,794.70
180,784.00
-
- - 989.30
6051800.00
-
- PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
36,618.05
176,872.21
169,814.00
(7,058.21)
265,200.00
PURCHASED POWER
1,718,934.08
1,665,182.15
1,745,122.44
_ 79,940.29
4,841,412.00
TRANSMISSION OPERATION
79.45
45.05
45.00
(.05)
3,800.00
-
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE
9,114.25
13,526.60
13,190.00
1,663.40
53,000.00
l
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
55,950.39
55,574.91
55,959.00
,. 384.09
163,550.00
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
52,790.03
56,221.7!
50,016.00
(6,205.71)
110,200.00
-
MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION
1,461.78
766.69
857.00
90.31
3,200.00
-_
MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
100.31
59.04
200.00
140.96
500.00
-
PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE
1,506,177.10
1,382,766.48
1,564,000.00
401,233.52
4,090,240.00
-
GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
62,463.72
61,767.45
63,679.80
1,912.35
177,780.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
11,040.49_
_ 13,626.03
9,533.00
(4,093.03)
50,500.00,
CUSTOMER EXPENSES
39,686.36
45,509,52
45,054.00
(455.52)
_
123,800.00
_.
CUSTOMER SERVICES
6,320.50
6,853.19
6,228.00
(625.19)
17,300.00
!
ADMINISTRATIVE 6 GENERAL EXPENSES ,.
353,776.52
373,188.09
355,756.80
(17,431.29)
989,560.00_
DEPRECIATION
241,730.24
248,000.00
245,520.00
(2,480.00)
_
744,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
4,273,909.65
4,079,753.82
4,527,759.04
448,005.22
12,239,842.00
OPERATING INCOME
1,008,146.22
582,221.12
863,082.04
(280,860.92)
1,830,419.54
OTHER INCOME��
OTHER - NET
20,366.31
39,004.39
2,110.00
16,894.39
INTEREST INCOME
325,550.29
205,655.80
150,259.09
55,396.71
883,877.00
-
_ MISC INCOME _- - _ ,
_ 896.85
_ 5,671.69
5,941.00 -_.
_ (269.31)
45,700.00
MISC INCOME - GAS
.00
92,776.16
.00
_
92,776.16
-
.pp
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
346,813.45
323,108.04
158,310.09
164,797.95
938,577.00
`1
OTHER EXPENSES
- --
-- - - -
MISC EXPENSES
1,945.59
17,553.00
2,030.00
(15,523.00)
34,000.00'(
INTEREST EXPENSE
.. 46,264.00
- _ 35,588.00
37,735.75
_ 2,147.75
114,287.50
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
48,209.59
53,141.00
39,765.75
_
(13,375.25)
148,287.50
NON - OPERATING INCOME
_ 298,603.86
269,967.04
118,544.34
- 151,422.70
790,289.50
NET INCOME
1,306,750.08
852,188.16
981,626.38
(129,438.22)
2,620,709.04
- - {(
GI
l
Hutchinson Community Development Corporation
Board of Directors
• Friday, May 1, 1992
Chamber Meeting Room
Directors Present
James Bullard - Chairman
John Mlinar
Phil Graves
Larry Graf
Carol Haukos
Larry Fraser
Otheri P a n
John Bernhagen -Exec Director
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bullard.
Motion was made by Graves, seconded by Fraser and carried to approve the
minutes of April 3, 1992.
Motion was made by Graf, seconded by Haukos and carried to approve the
financial statement of February 28 and March 31, 1992.
Bullard reported on the "Star City" site visit. Those attending from the
State Department of Trade and Economic Development were Bill Coleman and Gene
Goddard. In Addition, Kevin Moss, Economic Development Director from Chaska
was in attendance as part of the visitation team. Regarding our objective to
• develop a city wide quality improvement program they suggested contacting the
Minnesota Quality Council for ideas. They also suggested making an
application to the SW Initiative Fund for a grant to help with an outside
facilitator and in the development of an organization chart for the city in
it's various development functions.
Bernhagen have an update on Phase 16 II development. In particular,
reference was made to a chart showing the different options and execution
dates of the acquisitions for Phase Ii. The apparent agreement with the
Dakota Rail acquisition was also discussed.
After a great deal of discussion concerning how HCDC should be organized for
the future, a planning meeting was set for Wednesday, May 13 from 4 - 6 PM.
Bernhagen will make available comparisons of various organizations set forth
in State Statutes to include: Port Authorities, Economic Development
Authorities, Housing and Redevelopment Authorities, Non - Profit Corporation
(present structure), and a city staff person whose job description would
include planning and economic development duties.
Motion by Graves, seconded by Graf and carried that a request for a loan from
the city's revolving loan funds to build a shelter in a mobile home park would
not qualify.
Bernhagen reported on several legislative issues dealing with the hauling of
waste for the city and a bill dealing with a special service district for
• Hutchinson Main Street. He also reported the state had made a visit regarding
our SCDP grant and that certain corrections were being made. The life safety
project on Main Street is nearly ready for bidding.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
•LY...'1,
PIY4C °4LAN„ L16•.41 J..F"
:JJYf1 )•
FT:.AhCIAL
SY.Tc9
IP+1el
P.;a
ERPEMDITUIE 6010EL146
AS OF S/92
I>:c6
L19Aa4Y
REIC °:.T IF
"A%
:COJNT
DiS:41Prto4
CURRENT
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
60GT - ACT
6UOGET
THIS -404TH
9EAR43 -GATE
01Fc0iNCF
PCT
6•A7Y
;-4vttEs
>
SALAIIE5 ANJ •A ",
9.C.00 �.1J
5.,12•..0
3.5,229.73
514.14u.47
43
..lJ
4,4 -Ti I4.JA15Cc
04.6 > ^. !„
c,37u. a5
;1.697.54
14.711.0'.
44
46A,T4 14;JAAJCc • J uJCTI!L°
4,9: S. n..
..1
1.417.7.
1.372.6?
3:
5114
6001°JM.4T INS'J4L. E
1.3.761.0,
6,529.91
44.134.45
S4.63c. >5
4)
T3r4L
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,064,967.011
91,421.16
452.564.26
611.402.14
42
:111 NATc611,5
5,]S
6J ?4S - ADJLT
1:2,7: ]. OJ
61.94
25,772.60
50,127.20
23
1,13
5J14S - CnILDRES
30.9.0.00
41.15
7,1 >4. SA
23,465..9
2.
5,1.
;cYcPAL R:FiR'c N.P
0,0.00.;
.u^
6,547,27
9,414.75
61
62711
PE4I7u T.A,S
16,750oc,
117.05
16.667.97
6,461.73
73
S2 ?d
P. +PMLETS
3]0.00
.07
19.54
29..50
7
S,?d
1.IiIA LIdPA9Y MATERIALS
6.967.00
51.00
1,416.71
1.96..[6
39
S23.
!0`13]4 LI6AARY MAT ?Af ALS
1,437.011
.00
9,4.77
1.122.23
22
5212
F.1AFA■ ;L-T M%T441 ALS
2,669.00
.00
7,274.51
574..9
1.
5235
CMIPPEWA C]JNrY LL7RAAY MAT01ALS
20.5.7.00
.00
9.4G4.2Y
12.143.71
41
6240
43VrEVTJEJ MATERIALS
52,056.n0
.00
2,21].11
9,041.d9
13
5245
10 +M FTL +S
2,000.00
.00
.O4
11u0u..5
J
62S.
VIDCO T4PcS
5,000.04
254.15
606.1.
4,333.d6
13
S:53
A.)1] DISCS A.vn TARES
600.00
.O^
407.67
_ 7.67-
172
S25J
30)OS AND FILM Sriin
250.00
.00
.04
2SJ.09
]
5,5.
+1CAPJRNS
500.00
.00
17.50
262.513
0
6274
%[Nat%;
1,000.90
.00
.00
1.000.00
0
TN AL
MATERIALS
237.319.00
526.29
74,746.73
162.632.27
31
12: CATAL;;[NG
S31J
DOL: ANJ 4TnFA C44RGES
17,366.90
.00
9,5L0.0,
9.100.J0
441
53 ?J
C,4 Vc4,OR CHAR;ES
25,70 ^.. 0:
.00
12,606.91
13. 133. D7
41
T31AL
CAT4661NG
43,606.00
.00
21,366.92
22,241.36
69
:7: Y:4ICLPS
S.S.
?IFAATIJY A0 MAIVT:NANCE
14,50.0.
411:..4
S,6,1_.]5
4,97..95
34
S36i
IYSJ9AN:F
3.414.CJ
.W
1.9.9.93
L..45.12
Fd
W.
l• ?q'I'A7I74
1.r.r,0u
.00
.06
O.uSJ.J?
�L
VEHICLES
26,015.00
610.44
7,590.93
14.426.07
29
S.IJ
'.L:PH)-,E Ah) LINE :4A9GFS
1D,]OD.00
1.212.01
7,67 ;.111
4,326.9r
S7
54 ?J
TERMINI, MA14T- NAINCE
1, 000. DJ
.00
.00
1.036.00
J
4430
POSTAGE A40 SHIPPIV;
12,715.0.
1.351.2?
5.3r0.73
7.324..7
42
T3I 4L
C] +IIUNI:ATION
23.715.00
2.594.63
11.063.53
12.651.17
47
:S4 F,JI94.%T
1453
NEd F]U1PMEIT
7,555.10
.00
3.952.94
1.221.94-
146
S.SJ
1/V FNIPME0
1,000.00
.00
.Ov
1, J0..uC
;
W.
+AIYT,44N:P A:.D C,4TRACIS
15,Ou^.Ou
55.16
5,442.57
0,597.33
3.
T]T4L
EQUIPMENT
16.655.00
55.16
9,265.61
9.369.39
so
163 )TIER
65]0
CuST90TAL SUPPLIES ANu iOUIPYLIT
1,500.94
.00
615.50
Alb 42
4,
5533
CJST'1LIAL Sc 4YI:E5 - MONTEV10c0
S.OLD.OJ
.00
1.7um.00
3.30J.J0
3.
531.
SJP +LIF. ANJ 0014TI:.S
27.494.13
296•.5
11.793.02
16.703.99
77
551,
P9040TTJ4AL AAD P401144MIA.
1.040.00
.uO
5)).04
Ill..$
130
552;
+ILcAGE AnJ +;FTINOS - STAPF
6,500.00
.UO
2,666.63
3.013.17
A.
6)25
+ILCA6E Aw9 MEETTN;S - TRUSTEES
4,50D.00
11.50
7.329.70
21171.00
12
5551
PROP. M- 06ERSMIPS - (TRUSTEES)
400.00
.00
30S.O.
94.00
71
6533
14SJ4A46E
13,000.00
.00
11,460.90
1,54J.03
F.
65411
AJS 1,40 LEGAL NOTICES
107.10
.00
160.90
.00
.00
654.
AJ]ITLN.
11s4*.OJ
.00
1,7.0.00
20J.00-
,13
53SJ
5J3R9c F?I:.S
3.000.06
225.110
1,125.00
I.d75.u0
39
5555
CJNTINUIN6 EDUC4TI34
500.00
23.93
162.93
33r.62
32
6559
S:4JLARS91P FUND
1.0110.011
.00
97.25
402.75
1.
5573
M.WI4. EXPENSE - DTRECTOP.
1.000.00
.00
1.244.45
244.45-
124
T3TAL
OTHER
66,494.00-
576.69
34.699.55
31.594.65
52
l7J SPE:IAL
5614
SLEN:JE FRIENDS, 19,13
1.392.00
.OD
47.72
1.314.i!
56?.
RCM,
4.515.00
.00
1,916.24
2.599.76
62
LOCAL EQUIPMENT
6,0011.03 -
S9.89
2.171.54
3,626.46
36
STATE SALcS TAX
2,0]0.711
.00
693.73
1.139.27
43
SPECIAL
13,676.00
$9.69
4,996.23
6,661.77
36
71TAL
LISAARV
1.494,711.00
96,OS3.26
616,514.06
670,196.94
61
FIVAL TOTALS
49 ACCOUNTS
1,494.711.00
96,033.25
616,314.06
676.196.94
41
6AIJIYCe OR
RA161 3,'31192 $74,390.29
:5 it f.l.T
L I•.3•Y
A:CJUNT _ DESCRIPTION
L: -aA =V
2 :1. 3cCcIPii
• :71 F3 i:C Sf aT E /FEOp AL AIO
0A C %'.TY
`13. -E!X.k :0v-.Ty
513. ac ;.'LL_ :36tirY
5135 SIFT C:U.TY
3:33 r_L."4 Y °:7v lU' CJUVrV
E: U APPLET3:I
4145 3cNSC.%
S:S: G -ENCJs
5155 SAACEVILL'_
S1S7 :a A•;1tE _FALLS
5150 MJTCHIVSOS -- - -- - - -� -
!165 KERCH:VEN
S170_LRSME Ie I --
4172 IL IV I:
5175 ]R%-:V ILLE
5.4, Y:LL�L3
5:6S `1 ?J ISLAI.O
5'90 OAJACN
4:95 HECT3S
4Ar IS:'0
•_'IV ILL=
S.IU CASm i_C °IPTS C SALES TAX
5424 •.:PIS
S.JJ
TITAL RECEIPTS
s I.V�EAlAr4 L!94A4V SYST.4
I',TL✓ti 4TEL FII.ANCIAL SVST,M
REVENUE GUIDELINE
CURRENT ._ ACTUAL
6UDGET T1415 -MONTH
:7..NrY 74
AS OF 5/92
ACTUAL
TEAR -TO -GATE
IF.1.1 FAA:
EvOS 6/91/42 toil
4EACFMr OF VEAL
60GT - ACT
OIFFERENC0PCr
32, 339.Ou
.JO
.00
32,339.00
U
302,851.00
.09
1J4.C,O.OJ
280,171.09
2,
22.473.96
.00
11,4a6.S,
11.4RS. 50
5C
11.339, ^0
.00
.7, 7d6.31
2j .55,v.
52
124.17). C.
24.07.;. ]
09, 6.7.)U
34.04J.J]
It
51, 673. J,
.00
15.835.50
li.530.57
SJ
76,444. -.J
..3
59,2..6.90
17.770.60
75
73.406.7.
_ .00
35.743.00
36.701.00
44
02,..3.7-
.07
27.7.2.70
3., 345..0
45
35,9.2.0:
d. 915.57
17,971.00
17, 471 a
SO
34. 3S 1, J:
.u7
5, 3J1.OG
32.OS0.00
16
9.677.OJ
.00
4,838.50
4, Sad. so
so
19.353.00
.00
9, 475. SO
9,676.50
SJ
2.123.90
1,376.10
4,964.OQ.__
4.91440
SO___
28.877.CJ
.00
14,438.S0
__ _
14,43d.S0
SJ
4,030.0.
.u0
2,015.00
2.035.00
S4
_ 23.710.00 _
.OQ___
_ t1, 6ss. O0
11,655.00
SJ_
63.053.00
15,763.25
31,326.50
3L,S26.50
_
SO
4,148.00
.00
2,014.00
2,074.00
SO
44.991.Q0_ ______
__.00____,_
j2.495..SO
6,7'.0.70
SO
22,337.03
.00
11,168.33 - -�
__;2.445.50
11,166.50 -__
-S,
13,11CO.O.
.00
5.650.00
6.650.00
50
:71,866.Ov___
.00
76,392.70
25,454.00
72
9.925.00
.00
4.964.00
4.964.07
SJ
13,148.00
.CO
6,574.00
0.574.00
Su
4.687.00_
.00
4,343.90
4.343.50
50
14,940.*,
.CO
1.470.03
7.490.00
S0
11.169.00
.00
5.375.75
2.792.2%
75
5G.000.96
6,GS3.47
17.944,45
32.01;.SS
36
3, ov0. 70
.07
1V2. 90
2.807. to
6
6.5 0,00
17.420.64
37.716.75
24.276. TS-
473
1.432,594.00_
76,102.86
695.267.85
137.326.15
49
IS
9E14{O•a °1i IT;-LRJ -P °4A COUNT7(P- ASOVNEL
13, ?33.36
.00
15,0011.0c,
`.25
=c!•au °;Z 1 ? .A 3 - OLIV:A (4LTE4IAL$ 04LY)
2.970.04
.00
3.709.04
3.234.00
910. J9-
�32
32
5E"J% (4AIF %IAL; JNLY)
1,367.0.
.40
I,5C0.00
vo
101)
C410024A C)J4TY (.VAT = +TlU J%LY)
IS,Ouo.],
.rQ
25C.-la
34,750.00
2
tc a6
•cI40 - MJ9 TEV1:2J (Y:TZ..IAL; ALTS
10.0U7.0u
.CO
S, 0 J2. so
..991.50
9u
TITAL
RE149USEMENTS 1L0C4L GOVEa4MEJIT)
47,617.00
.00
25,541.59
22,075.41
S4
)TYE' 't,I4VJR3- M9:.TS
!X70
JIAF9 Ac: +11J-S�NTG
3.3uP.7.
1.070.69
2,123.40
1.)7,.1]
61
11FAL
OTHER REIMSURSEMENTS
3.500.00
1,076.69
2.123.90
1,376.10
61
59)i
AJT54AT107 FUN:
.00
.00
30,163.50
10,163.50-
J
SOLJ
GLESC)E FJ::J
.00
.00
100.00
100.00-
J
•4 ?.
KC.L
5.000.00 _._.__.
_. 43.99 ___
_5a568.76
566.76-
}I1_
.7�
L:)q =.J: ° <:VT C r1;:ELL4:E3u5
6,7'.0.70
.00
.00
e.00v.JO
0
T31AL
3T4E4 FUNDS
11,000.00
43.99
15,632.26
4.832.26-
144
r3TAL
L15RAaY
1,494,711.00
79,223.54
736.765.60
755,945.40
49
• FINAL TJTALS 41 ACCOUNTS
1,494.711.00
79.223.54
736,745.60
7S5,945.40
49
Board of Directors meeting - Thursday, May 7, 1992 &'E-A/
mc�eattc
CROW RIVER GUILD, Inc.
1. Meeting called to order by Secretary Joyce Young. Present were Director, Butch
Schulte, Joy Berg, Brian Brosz, Mavis Schwanke and by telephone Bob Wilde, Chairman.
Guests were Linda Peck and Kari Reed. Introductions were given.
2.Previous minutes were read and approved. MSP Mavis /Joyce.
3. Treasurers report was approved. MSP Joyce /Brian. $5243.42 in savings and $340.02
in checking. Also, a transfer to have $3500.00 in checking to pay bills in-
cluding charged items and preapproval of monthly bills such as rent, utilities,
and telephone was approved. MSP Joyce /Mavis. Butch wrote to the City of
Hutchinson for payment of $5,000.00 due per Council action.
4. Financial report will be filed after the Board meeting.
5. Bills submitted were approved.
6. Correspondence was received from the Chamber of Commerce and SMAHC with thanks
for our dues payments. Anita West responded in writing her willingness
to accept nomination for the Board.
%. Program report - Class enrollments were taken May 5 at the Rec Centers payments
are due at the time of enrollment. Summer Theater received names of 30 in-
terested students. MSP Brian /Joy. - .Butch will coordinate with McLeod and
Meeker Fair Boards to check out and enter in agreements with them (4H show
times, exhibit day etc.) and oversee search for Director and production choice.
Class participant lists will be keep on the desk for volunteers to
refer to and add to as requests come in.
• MSP Joyce /Brian - to authorize contracts to be made with instructors as
deemed necessary or appropriate. Butch contact Doris Mohler to handle
contracts.
8. Networking report - May exhibit contains work by Linda Peck, Ron Kubista and
Ellie Becker. There was talk of a reception at the end of the show.
The committee should be approached by Butch.
There should be a review of past exhibits to update committee on artists
available. Paula Holt is willing to serve on the Committee.
9. Volunteer meeting - to be held Friday, May 8 at 9:30 to duscuss new ideas.
10. Membership Drive - Strategy: Business will be handled by Ted Beatty, Individual/
Family will be handled by volunteer telephone callers. Outlying communities
will be contacted by Butch. MSP Mavis /Joy to approve'the Challenge Grant
agreement between SMAHC and Crow River Arts under Butch's direction.
MSP Brian/Joy to authorize Butch to implement an Organizational Membership
Exhapge with other groups to get support use of member lists and trade
:dues payments. Mavis is authorized to draw checks.
11. 990 Sign Off - MSP Joyce /Brian to approve signatures required by State to bring
up to code regarding non - profit status.
12. Equipment purchase - MSP Mavis /Joy to authorize Butch to proceed with the Hutch-
inson Women's Club according to their wishes for method of payment.
13. Annual Dinner Meeting - MSP Joyce /Mavis to set Thursday, June 4 at the Coach or
Victorian Inn for a social evening and brief business report. Butch will
firm up place, menu and cost. Ballots for Board of Director candidates
will be prepared by Joyce. Volunteers will handle invitation proceedure.
14. Fee Schedule for services for Butch Schulte. MSP Joy /Brian to accept Butch's
proposal for payment. Weekly maintenance fees $150.00. Dues maintenance
• feet 2510 of dues collected annually over $1,000.00. Grants maintenance
feet 25°0 of Grants obtained with the exclusion of base grants of $10,000.00
from the City of Hutchinson and SMAHC. Program /Activity feet 2% of revenues
over and above the Direct Cost of the program and activity. He will pay his
Workmans Comp, Social Security, etc.
15. Next meetings Butch will call Board Members to et date the early part of the first
week in June, before Annual Meeting. /rn =7}_-/,% /�7jL
Fee Schedule for Services effective 10 May 1992 •
Weekly Maintenance Fee $150.00
Dues Maintenance Fee
25 % of dues collected over $1000.00
Grants Maintenance Fee
25 % of Grants obtained
The Base Grants of $10,000.00 from Hutchinson and the
Base Grant of $10,000.00 from SMAHC are Excluded
Other Grants are not excluded
Program/Activity Fees
25 % of Revenues over and above the Direct Cost
of the Program or Activity
I*
•
PROGRAM /ACTIVITIES
Art
Children's Theat.
Classes
Concert /Symphony
TOTAL
- 439.98
439.98
TENTATIVE BUDGET REES
161.61
- 2741.00
•
- 3201.92
1
BUDGETED
ADD'L REV. TOTAL FUNDS AV.
MONTHLY EXP.
EXP TO DATE
BALANCE
OVER�W
- 3996.40
- 244.00
244.00
- 158.78
7500.00
- 7500.00
625.00
6250.00
1250.00
Insurance
250.00
- 250.00
-
250.00
-
Utilities
900.00
- 900.00
61.27
625.77
274.23
Bldg. Rep. & Faint.
100.00
- 100.00
-
26.80
73.20
Postage
300.00
- 300.00
-
214.70
85.30
Equipment
1100.00
- 1100.00
-
1100.00
-
Off. Supplies & Exp
600.00
- 600.00
37.39
325.87
271.13
Fed. /State Fees
100.00
- 100.00
-
60.00
40.00
Ass'n Fees
150.00
- 150.00
-
75.00
75.00
Advertising
750.00
- 750.00
-
723.06
26.94
Prof. Training
150.00
- 150.00
-
30.00
120.00
Contract Labor
7200.00
- 7200.00
-
2804.63
4395.37
TOTAL
19100.00
- 19100.00
770.66
,12485.83
6614.17
PROGRAM /ACTIVITIES
Art
Children's Theat.
Classes
Concert /Symphony
TOTAL
- 439.98
439.98
- 278.37
161.61
- 2741.00
2741.00
- 3201.92
460
- 965.90
965.90
1409.86
443 .96
- 3545.00
3545.00
- 3996.40
- 244.00
244.00
- 158.78
7935.88 7935.88
47.00
47.00 90+5.33
Checking Acct Bal. as of
.92
(451.40
85.22
(1109.45)
ioinn nn =5 88 27035 88 817.66 21531.16 550+.72
DUES 380.00
GRANTS 15000.00
Find Raisers 60.00
Rent 10.00
Refunds 65.00
Interest 41.68
Scholarship Fund 325.00
TOTAL 15881.68
Checking Acct Bal. 649.27
YEAR TO DATE 23817-56
Saving Acct Bal. 6243,42
PrWA
ft Sag
LILL , 'AAA .
ll
3.
Li
' •
®
�
®��
I
�
���I
it
�
1��1)A■II
�
oil
llligii
oil
■itilli■il
oil
oil
1II11IIImI:
m
IRWIN
���n�
ne�n'inn��
®inner
®1■iiiiiiin
iiii
=iieniniiiii'��i�ii
ii
INS
l
III
III
IA
�Jr■■Inln
■li
I
I
Nip
HIM
Oil
Hill
1111111111111111m
HUM
1111111111111911111
■
I
i
a
Irm
3
a
111;
I■I■IIINM
AN
MEN
21111111111111
111111111M.".
HIPS!
11111111111111111110111
min.44polm
'min
; m IRWIN
millin
moil!
III
illillimil
■11
■oil
I'I
0
11
oil
OiN
11116"11111111111
iiiiiiilCli
AA■I
1E
ON
I
Will
■In
NEWS
*r.9
■i■1■n!
NOlimilimil
-mml
ourn
Toommoulooll
�
n
Elm
i
Oil
imi
19919WO)YEll
MS
n
117M
1
iiinli■i
■■imlimil
111111091
lie�mmi
milimmil
W
I I ll■
IN
I■III1qflM11
lmllg%q,9m!
I
1
i
9
■in
I
milillimil
millillol'i
is
SUN
� - -1
II
im:!po■ii
n���
1
�" ��
�
Gfl�
�I■IIn�1
Bell
ME[
IN,
111111115IRmi
■N■NNI
mmmialiff
■inill
■impi
■
mill
11
1
IIS
NN
in
if
P1711111
11
■In
III
ANN
IN
■in
I
ilinimillill
i
■villill■l
In
III
isill
iimim
I
linimillill
isminimi
milislimi
■
ililli■■
IINNIM11111111111
0MR111111
I
limimlililis
L&TC912'IIII
1t■11111H■1
saillilimi
mliiiiiml
■
Inni
IMF
I
limisilllll
isillili■i
MIi1II111I
11
iniisi
0,M,i
NON
I
li■isillillulmilmilli
liiiiingliimmi
10
II
13
14
Is
16
17
18
21
v
23
34
m
27
n
21
32
35
A
37