Loading...
cp07-27-1999 c0 6 0 JULY SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 1999 -25- -26- -27- HUTCHINSON 7:00 a m. — Leadership Team Mtg. CITY in Main Conf. Room CALENDAR Noon — Hutchinson Safety Council Meeting at Heritage Center 9:00 a.m. — Management Team Mtg. in Main Conf. Room WEEK OF . 5:30 p.m. — Airport Commission at Civil Air Patrol Building 5:30 p.m. - City Council Mtg. Ju4 25-31 in Council Chambers WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY -28- -29- -30- -31- CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/ TRAININGNACATION 26 -30 Christie Rock (V) 3:00 p.m. — Utilities Commission 2:00 p.m. —Open Bids for Civic at Utilities Office Arena Bleachers in City Center Main Conf. Room C =Conference M = Meeting S = Seminar T = Training V = Vacation . AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, J ULY 27, 1 INVOCATION — Rev. James Hakes, Seventh Day Adventist Church MIN'UTE„S — REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 13, 1999 AND BID OPENING OF JULY 14, 1999, JULY 16, 1999 AND JULY 23, 1999 (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 15, 1999 2. HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OFJUNE 28, 1999 3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 1999 4. FINANCIAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATES INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JUNE 1999 • (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 99 -262 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE, DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF CERTAIN ASSETS TO RIDGEVIEW CHANHASSEN CLINIC, A MINNESOTA NON - PROFIT CORPORATION (SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11263 — RESOLUTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW (c) ❖ MCLEOD COUNTY AG. ASSOCIATION FOR COUNTY FAIR ❖ UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION DUE TO INADEQUATE STAFFING: ➢ OSCAR MENA FOR ARMORY ON AUGUST 28, 1999 ➢ JOSE A. PALACIOS FOR ARMORY ON AUGUST 21, SEPTEMBER 4 AND SEPTEMBER 18, 1999 (d) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR POLICE CHIEF TO ATTEND TRAINING COURSE IN ARLINGTON, VA (e) "ON SALE" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MCLEOD COUNTY AG. ASSOCIATION FOR BEER GARDEN AT COUNTY FAIR (I) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS • 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON TO CONSTRUCT POLE TYPE GARAGE AT 426 HURON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999 i STREET SE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11264) 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER TO CONSTRUCT VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATED IN I/C DISTRICT AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11265) 3. VACATION OF DEDICATED STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY LOCATED IN STUCKE'S FIRST ADDITION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AND SET SECOND READING FOR AUGUST 10, 1999) 4. FINAL PLAT KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FOURTH ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11266) Action — Motion to approve consent agenda i 0 11 Lei :1 X1 5 11 ► LOM&I� ' (a) CONTINUED ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT NO. 99 -03 & 99 -04; CENTURY AVENUE SW AND DALE STREET SW (CONTINUED FROM JULY 13, 1999) • Action - Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11268 (b) ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 99 -10, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5031; TH 15 SOUTH AND DENVER AVENUE SW Action — Motion to continue assessment hearing to August 24, 1999 — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11269 (c) CABLE FRANCHISE TRANSFER FROM TRIAX TO MEDIACOM Action — Motion to continue hearing (d) BOARD OF REVIEW FOR A.W. DISPOSAL SANITATION SERVICES Action — Motion to close hearing 6. COMMUNICATIONS. R EQUFSTS P .TITTONS (a) BOND SALE REPORT ON 1999 IMPROVEMENT BONDS BY EHLERS & ASSOCIATES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11267 7. I — NONE `a • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999 (a) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO CONTRACT WITH UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TO COMPILE, ANALYZE AND PRESENT COMMUNITY NEEDSSURVEY Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve contract (b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LETTING NO. 9, PROTECT NO. 98 -18 (HOSPITAL/MEDICAL CENTER PARKING LOT) Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution (c) DISCUSSION ON CENTRAL GARAGE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ISSUES (CITY /COUNTY /STATE/HUTCHINSON UTILITIES) Action — (d) CONSIDERATION OF REFUSE CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH A. W. DISPOSAL, INC. !. Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (e) CONSIDERATION OF MIGHTY DUCKS GRANT AGREEMENT Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve agreement and adopt Resolution No. 11261 (I) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BIOSOLIDS DRYING FACILITIES EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (g) UPDATE FROM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONCERNING CONSTRUCTION OF GARAGE AT 550 MILLER AVENUE SW Action - (h) CONSIDERATION OF LETTING NO. 14, PROJECT NO. 99 -35; WEST HALF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION (CENTURY 7 CINEMA); ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11270, No. 11271 and No. 11272 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999 • (i) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING CENSUS 2000 PROCLAMATION Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve �u T.r�l� 1111:�►1 �Cili7.� (a) COMMUNICATIONS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds �\ laf•111:7►`lu' 1 ICY N • MINUTES BID OPENING JULY 14, 1999 Director Randy DeVries called the bid opening to order at 1:00 p.m. Also present were Bill Chang of Earth Tech and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. The reading of Invitation to Bid, Biosolids Drying Facilities Equipment Procurement and Installation was dispensed with. The following bid was opened and read: McCormick Construction Co. Rockford, MN $1,302,700.00 The bid was referred to City staff for review and a recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 1:05 p.m. n W MINUTES BID OPENING JULY 16, 1999 Police Chief Steve Madson called the bid opening to order at 1:00 p.m. Also pr nt was Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 6037, Notice of Public Sale of Forfeited V le (1998 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z -34), was dispensed with. The following bids wer shed and read: Lynn Gemand Lynn's Auto Sales Hutchinson, MN $1 )0.00 Van Karg Hutchinson, MN $12,651.00 R & R Auto Sales Madelia, MN $14,500.00 The bids were referred to City staff for review and a recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 1:05 p.m. W • 0 • MINUTES BID OPENING JULY 23, 1999 City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at 10:00 a.m. Also present were City Engineer John Rodeberg and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 6036, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 9, Project No. 98 -18, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read: Duininck Bros., Inc. Prinsburg, MN $359,291.00 $ 85,559.00 Dec. 1, 1999 Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. • Hamburg, MN $408,079.42 $ 60,865.22 No Date Reiner Contracting Inc. Hutchinson, MN $237,870.25 $ 56,467.49 60 Days The bids were referred to City staff for review and a recommendation. The meeting adjourned at 10:05 a.m. 0 N MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 15, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dean Wood at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Dave Westlund, Jim Haugen, Jeff Jones, Bill Arndt, Dean Kirchoff, and Chairman Dean Wood. Absent: Jeff Haag Also present: Julie Wischnack, Director of Planning and Zoning, Bonnie Baumetz, Planning and Zoning; and Richard Schieffer, City Legal Counsel. 2. a) Consideration of minutes of regular meeting dated May 18, 1999. Mr. Arndt made a motion to approve the minutes. Seconded by Mr. Haugen the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING REQUEST SUBMITTED BY JUNE REDMAN TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM C-4 AND R -2 TO I/C LOCATED AT 255 AND 287 HWY 7 EAST Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 5:34 p.m. with the reading of publication #6021 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Baumetz explained the property contains three structures: a home /office, a residence, and an accessory building which is used for the brick and tile company. The property boundaries are oddly shaped. Amcon Block abuts the north and eastern portions of the property. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The zoning district adjoins an industrial area and uses within the I/C are controlled by conditional use permits. 2. The rezoning will not have a negative impact on the surrounding properties. 3. The existing use of the property is more than commercial use. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westlund. The hearing closed at 5:39 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Westlund . The motion carried unanimously. b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ROLLING MEADOWS AND REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM R -1 TO R -3 SUBMITTED BY BRUCE NAUSTDAL LOCATED NORTH OF HUSKI ADDITION (TDM AVE.) AND SOUTH OF JOHNSON COURT (GOLF COURSE RD. Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 5:39 p.m. with the reading of publication #6022 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Wischnack explained the existing zoning of the property is R -1. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area as Medium Density Residential, which allows for zoning of R -3. The property is approximately 31 acres. The proposed density would be 2.7 units per acre. The proposed preliminary plat provides for 84 single family lots. The final plat provides for 21 tots. The lot saes range from 7,200 sq. ft. to 16,00 sq. feet. The R -3 Zoning District provides for a minimum lot size of 7,200 sq. ft. The minimum lot widths and depths are met by the plan. Outlot A provides a storm water ponding area. The pond elevations were provided by Barr, although, in discussing this with the project engineer, the pond will be lowered because of the existing elevations of the homes to the west. Outlot B is a swale type drainage area that leads to the storm water pond. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning, preliminary and final plat with the following conditions: 1. The subdividers agreement be finalized and executed. 2. The identified utility easement be expanded. 3. Remove platted right of way on the southeastern portion of the plat. 4. Provide a resolution to the maintenance of Outlot B. _ Jean Ward explained the affordable housing planned for this area. The lots are sized for single family housing. The 60 ft. lot widths are needed to keep housing affordable . They are looking for effective designs for single family with detached garages. They are asking to be rezoned R -3 so the 60 ft. lot width w ll meet zoning requirements. Bruce Naustdal, developer. said ( for comparison) the smallest lots in Parkside Additio is currently c onsbucting homes, are 68 to 80 ft lots. Mr. Neustdal said his intent is to corm ( de fandty homes. Mr. LeRoy Hlavke, 925 Luadke Lane said he would like some type of buffer between . no and R -3 development. Marty Campion, civil engineer, Otto Associates, said ponding for the project and outside 6 ddng up a lot area. Smaller lots are needed to make it profitable for the developer. Size of the was determined by a city consultant from Barr Engineering. This is a regional pond. Ms. Wischnack said cost of pond will be partially funded by the city — 31%. Bob Williams, 945 Ludtke Lane, is concerned with water running through his back y,- His Is concerned the water may back up into his back yard as it flows to the pond. He d n't want apartment buildings in his back yard. Ms. Wlschnack said in a R -3 zone the developer wltl have to go through the condition- >_ process before constructing apartrnent houses. Marty Campion said provisions with the grading have been made to maintain cur( 3vations for drainage. Jeff Borkenhagen, 920Golt Course Rd. asked If an environmental Impact study r -- ueen done. Mike Van Ort- 920 Luedt ke Lane asked If Is It possible to have mobile homes : a R -3 zone district. Jean Ward Bald a onvirornrenhl Impart study has been done and then was rro Impact. As part of federal funding a study Is required. It was published In the newspaper. When Increasing the sizes of the lots decreases afordability of the homes. Diane Sorenson, reshot, said they wanted a ndxture of houses and have worked very hard to dispurse 60' Iota with 70' kNa. The trend Is to smaller lots with a common area. The houses will have double garages. it will be a mixture of designs of houses with basements. They need 84 units to meet requirements for funding. The pond will be a regional pond with a trail around It. Vegetation will be planted in and around lt. BIN Arndt asked if the trail can be connected to existing trails. Ms. Wlschnac k said the city park director did look at the development plans. Developer has offered to put In a trail to make it a nicer neighborhood. LuAnn Mueller, 711 California St., would like the pond fenced in on her side for safety reasons. Marty Campion said the maximum depth slopes V verfical in 4-5 horizontal. They are designing a 10' shelf. The first 10' will be relatively flat. Depth of permanent pool will be 5' after a storm event and then back to 3'. The pond is placed on the western area because existing water flow drains to this area. George Gwerth, 955 Luadke Lane, said he was against R-3 zoning and would like it to remain R -1 Jill Corson, 910 Golf Rd., doesn't want the zoning changed to R -3. Nathaniel Olson, 771 California SL , asked If the development is going to Increase traffic on California St., the increased traffic may cause concern for safety. Amy Anderson, said the potential for apartments in this area Is a concern. She felt apartment complexes tend to devalue surrounding property. Bruce Naustdal said he was willing to increase the size of lots on the northern portion of the plat to meet criteria of the R -2 zoning requirements and make lot area 8400 sq. ft. Jim Weckman, 761 California St., said he was concerned with R-3 zoning and asked if a covenant could be attached to the property to protect present property owners. He would like the grade changed on the pond, and he was also concerned with congestion on California St. 2 Marty Campion said the grades coincide with existing grades along the west property line providing enough storage area for storms. Bruce Naustdal said he would agree to include in covenants a statement limiting the lots to single family dwellings. Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westuad the hearing dosed at 7:05 p.m. Mr. Jones made a motion to recommend approval of the consideration for preliminary and final plat with staff recommendations, the lots north of 8th Ave NW meet the 8400 sq. ft. area requirement, wording be added to the association agreement limiting construction to single family homes, and ft city staff address roadway widths and maintenance around the pond. Seconded by Mr. Westund ft motion carried unanimously. Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Jones the hearing dosed at 7:05 p.m Mr. Arndt made a motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Jones. The motion carved unanimously. C) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THERMAN ELIOTT, 984 CHURCH STREET TO CONSTRUCT A 8 FOOT FENCE ON A CORNER LOT. Chairmen Wood opened the hearing at 7:22 p.m with the reading of publication #8024 as published In The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1999. Ms. Baumetz explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a conditional use permit to constrict a 8' fence along the front yard of a comer lot The lot is located on the northwest corner of Church Street S.W. and South Grade Road. The fence will be placed on South Grade Road. The property Is very flat toward both streets. The fence is proposed to be located 20 feet from the sidewalk area. The location has been checked by the City Engineer and will not create a visual problem for accessing the roadway. Staff recomnwWs approval of the request. Mr. Jones moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Haugen the hearing dosed at 7:25 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendation. Seconded by Mr. Jones. The motion carried unanimously. d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MARK RIEGER TO CONSTRUCT A 1,104 SO. FT. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE LOCATED AT 888 ELM ST S.E. Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:28 p.m. with the reading of publication #WM as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1999. Me. Baumelz explained the applicant has met the akerfa of Section 8.07 for issuance of a conditional use perk. k should be noted that the maximum height of the building is 18 feet There is a storm sewer catch basin to the north of the proposed garage. The required setback off at the adjoining property line is 8 feet Staff recommends approval. Mr. Kadhoff moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Arndt the heanmg dosed at 7:30 p.m. Mr. Ktchoff made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Arndt. The motion carried unanimously. e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDMONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE BUILDING AND A CML AIR PATROL OFFICE TRAILER LOCATED AT THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ON HWY 15 SOUTH. Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:30 p.m. with the readirg of publication #8025 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1989. Ms. Wnachnack said the applicant is requesting a conditional use perk to locate a 24' x 80' office trailer on airport property, 18713 Hwy. 15 South for use as a meeting and training headquarters. The City is also required to obtain a conditional use permit to construct an arivaUdeparlure building on the property. Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Jones the hearing dosed at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Westund. The motion carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OFAMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PL, 4RDING THE INFRASTRUCTURE STAGING PLAN. Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:36 p.m. with the reading of publicaw as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Wischnack said staff is requesting allowance to amend the Comprehensw- !o un:'.,,a the infrastructure staging plan (map). The map will indicate the direction of infras,. devC ument and update the expected year of priority to service the city. Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westiund the hearing c1mv -i ,t 7:38 p.m. Mr. Arndt made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recomme +, , :ens. Seconded by Mr. Westlund. The motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS HUNTER'S RIDGF :OND ADDITION- -_ SUBMITTED BY DENNIS KAHL The final plat for the second addition consists of 6 lots. The tit configuration fanged slightly, but has removed one lot. Staff recommends approval with the following con& 1. Execute Subdivider's Agreement 2. If the preliminary plat will not be followed in future platting, a n' plat must be submitted. 3. Final grading and utility plan approval. Mr. Westiund made a motion to approve the request with staff recommended conditions. Seconded by Mr. Arndt. The motion carried unanimously. 5. 1-31 Discussion regarding changing the format of the minutes. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m. 9 4 +HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION 11 June 28, 1999 5 3 p.m. Airport Lobby MINUTES Members present: Steve Crow, Joe Dooley, Robert Hantge, and Dave Skaar, Members absent: Jim Faber Others present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Bernie Knutson, HCDC; Tom Parker, Airport F.B.O.; John Olson, Asst Pub Wks Dir. There was a quorum of members present. OLD BUSINESS A discussion was held regarding the update meeting held with representatives of the City, TKDA, and contractors. The members were informed that progress was being made at near expected pace, with some slight delays caused by wet weather. Mike Wassman is TKDA's representative on -site. Members were encouraged to direct questions to Wassman or John Olson. Members discussed the fueling system. At this time, the commission recommended moving the fueling system "as is ". Any plans for a new reel system will be deferred to a future date. Members of the Civil Air Patrol informed the commission about the status of the double -wide commercial building that they will be moving onto airport property in conjunction with Phase II improvements. Member discussed the location of utilities to the building, particularly water and sewer. Members also discussed the location of the FBO's mobile home. Of concern were the locations of utilities, particularly water and sewer, and the home's orientation with the runway /taxiway. Members suggested that airport signs be erected on TH 15, Co. Rd. 8, and T.H. 22 to direct traffic to the airport. Olson reported that, with the exception of the fueling software, all other systems at the airport are compliant for potential problems related to the Year 2000 computer problem. Mn/DOT Aeronautics contacted the City, ensuring their systems pertaining to air traffic and safety are not affected by the problem_ NEW BUSINESS Commission members will contact donors toward the airport project to see whether they care to be recognized with a bronze plaque. Upon a motion made by Joe Dooley, seconded by Robert Hantge, the meeting adjourned. Next Meeting: July 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m. Location: Airport Lobby 4 4) -°2 Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting &nday, June 28, 1999 Members Present: Mary Henke, Paul Wright, Sue Munz, Kay Peterson Connie Lambert, Newton Potter, Lois Carlson Members Absent:Richard Peterson, Delores Brunner, Kay Johnson The - May minutes were read and approved. old Business: Mary Henke announced that Kay Johnson was appointed to the PLS Board. Mary Henke reported the trees by the library entrance will be replaced by smaller ornamental trees and the city will handle this. sue Munz reported on the banners of the various selections it was 2 colors @ $1 Brackets Set up fee Total for the library. After a discussion decided to purchase eight banners. 23.00 = $984.00 $384.00 $130.00 $1498.00 Linda Goetz, the children's librarian presented an update on the children's summer program. The program is progressing very well. In the 2 to 6 year old group, 86 have signed up, and the 6 to 14 year olds, 146 ve signed up for a total of 232 children. Linda reported on the need r more shelving and reported that David Gehrke had been contacted and ould match the present shelves for a price of $485.00. After a discussion the motion was made by Sue Munz and seconded by Connie Lambert to accept the bid of David Gehrke. Mary reported on the stucco and ceiling repairs. An invoice from Stacy Stucco Drywall Co. to repair stucco parapets and clean and paint plaster ceiling was read for a total of $1325.00. Mark Hensen had inspected the area and recommended the payment be made. Mary updated the group on the Technology commitee meeting, (formerly the Automation committee). Two libraries are automated and running, and Hutchinson will be by fall or winter. it was announced that five clay vases, a sculpture and a painting by Ruth Merrill Petersen were presented to the library by Joey Willmert and Walter Clay in memory of their mother, Elaine Clay. ATTENTION BOARD MEMBERS: There will be no July board meeting meeting will be August 30, the 5th Monday. The meeting was adjourned. Lois Carlson, Secretary • The next `14ef) '� u Amount 364,5DO.00 200,000.00 300,071.92 300, 000.00 168,935.62 (80,504.90) 300,000.00 161,617.93 (46,640.56) 100,000.00 200,000.00 500,000.00 208,371.04 (131,120.09) 399,625.00 500,0017.00 600,000.00 400,000.00 400,1300.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 600,0130.00 199,750.0 -- 200,000.00 300,000.00 1,211,3x8.60 200, 000.00 500,000.00 $9,253,994.56 - Y 'F CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT • 23- Jul -99 June 30, 1999 Date Date Interest Of Of Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity TREAS BONDS 644136 7.18% 12112/91 2/15/2001 Smith Barney GNMA 865M7 6.70% 9/04197 9/042D02 Smith Barney 313400 S H 7 5.00% 12130193 03110100 Smith Barney FHLB 3133m2-u 6.015% 02/05/98 02/05103 Prudential pool 336914 7.226% 12 31 96 02 01 2026 Expected life 6.2 years Smith Barney FNMA 6.100% 012098 01 2005 Prudentail pool 336399 7.270% 1231 96 0201 2026 Expected life 4.1 years Citizens, Marquette 4.00% 04/25196 06101/2001 Firstate, First Minnesota Prudential Fed Home Laon 6.00% 01/28/98 07/28/03 Smith Barney FNMA 6.13% 03/10/99 03/10/06 Smith Barney FNMA pass thru 7.50 0 /6 12/20/95 06/01102 REPAYMENT Prudential Fed Home Loan 6.00% 10/26/01 1026/01 Marquette 1847'1692 5.25% 04/15/99 04/14/00 Firstate 411235266 5.80% 05/14/98 06/17/99 Citizens Bank 29860 5.25% 052a/99 05/31/00 1St American 29852 5.60% D9 10 98 09 16 99 Marquette 184T1721 5.750% 04/15199 10/14/99 Citizens Bank 29837 5.600% 11 1298 08 12 99 1 St American 88526 5.60% 09 10 98 07 29 99 First Federal 411252287 5.30 0 /6 10 30 98 081299 Prudential FHL 5.79% 11 1898 11 1805 Cell 2/16/99 and therafter First Federal 5.15% 020599 02 10 DO First Federal 411252279 5.35% 103098 112999 Smith Barney Money Market 5.01% 03 15 99 061699 Citizens Bank 1635 5.150% 02 25 99 02 28 00 First Federal 411252295 5.15% 02 11 99 02 10 DO u Amount 364,5DO.00 200,000.00 300,071.92 300, 000.00 168,935.62 (80,504.90) 300,000.00 161,617.93 (46,640.56) 100,000.00 200,000.00 500,000.00 208,371.04 (131,120.09) 399,625.00 500,0017.00 600,000.00 400,000.00 400,1300.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 600,0130.00 199,750.0 -- 200,000.00 300,000.00 1,211,3x8.60 200, 000.00 500,000.00 $9,253,994.56 - Y 'F 1999P JUNE 1998 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL JUNE MONTH CITY OF HUTCHINSON FI�CIAL REPORT 1999 1999 JUNE MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEARTO MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL 1999 1999 1999 JUNE ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 600,000.00 654,302.22 1,787.73 652,514.49 654,302.22 1,685,972.00 1,031,669.78 LICENSES 135.00 457.00 4,114.38 (3,657.38) 24,967.00 30,200.00 5,233.00 PERMITS AND FEES 51,505.81 49,613.92 30,470.31 19,143.61 171,403.76 241,000.00 69,596.24 INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE 19,287.63 17,675.57 18,912.21 (1,236.64) 116,245.66 2,554,009.00 2,437,763.34 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 87,467.72 161,142.19 15,305.64 145,836.55 473,071.61 1,102,949.00 629,877.39 FINES & FORFEITS 3,798.07 4,200.81 6,012.01 (1,811.20) 19,172.73 65,000.00 45,827.27 INTEREST 15,239.79 46,234.13 4,864.18 41,369.96 129,832.51 50,000.00 (79,832.51) SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 2,748.70 (2,365.86) 509.35 (2,875.21) 586.72 500.00 (86.72) CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUND 1,250.00 2,132.43 195.35 1,937.08 201,107.98 1,154,050.00 952,942.02 REIMBURSEMENTS (7,938.59) (8,579.62) (2,241.44) (6,338.18) 55,274.38 71,650.00 16,375.62 SALES 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 (500.00) TOTAL 773,994.13 925,312.79 79,929.71 845,383.08 1,846,464.57 6,955,330.00 5,108,865.43 I 38.81% 82.67% 71.12% 4.55% 42.89% 29.50% 259.67% 117.34% 17.43% 77.14% 26.55% ! ! ! EXPENSE REPORT GENERALFUND MAYOR & COUNCIL 6,260.20 2,886.10 4,795.35 (1,907.25) 24,305.05 61,989.00 37,683.95 39.21% CITY ADMINISTRATOR 16,056.80 15,835.40 15,795.65 39.75 99,226.83 195,945.00 96,718.17 50.64% ELECTION' 111.80 246.20 0.51 245.69 246.75 4,300.00 4,053.25 5.74% FINANCt ?4.562.20 22,602.70 18,154.55 4,448.15 150,956.88 329,343.00 178,386.12 45.84% MOTOR VENICE "7 90 9,924.60 12,810.96 (2,886.36) 65,196.31 138,015.00 72,818.69 47.24% ASSESSING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,500.00 31,500.00 0.00% LEGAL 7,225,00 8,800.90 7,248.70 1,552.20 47,149.87 87,900.00 40,750.13 53.64% PLANNING 4,001.00 9,727.20 9,644.35 82.85 45,834.76 94,607.00 48,772.24 48.45% POLICE DEPARTMENT 151,187.00 169,993.50 117,410.60 52,582.90 862,875.88 1,588,220.00 725,344.12 54.33% SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER 1,502.80 4,558.50 3,861.81 696.69 30,423.33 105,100.00 74,676.67 28.95% EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 776.00 878.60 270.08 608.52 1,062.76 4,000.00 2,937.24 26.57% SAFETY COUNCIL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.00 100.00% FIRE DEPARTMENT 12,773.70 7,283.20 4,145.41 3,137.79 73,598.95 261,452. DO 187,853.05 28.15% FIRE MARSHAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 14,749.20 11,227.60 11,397.33 32,860.17 67,513.74 143,15-4.00 75,640.26 47.16% ENGINEERING 40,126.10 36,236.60 27,922.23 (18,530.93) 207,984.26 421,085.00 213,100.74 49.39% STREETS & ALLEYS 75,245.80 44,257.50 37,789.72 (29,153.32) 311,006,30 648,737.00 337,730.70 47.94% STREET MAINTENANCE A/C 13,810.40 9,391.30 8,697.33 2,032.47 68,456.62 93,830.00 25,373.38 72.96% CITY HALL 8,054.30 8,636.40 8,891.95 27,446.25 48,543.39 99,062.00 50,518.61 49,00% PARK/REC ADMIN. 10,525.30 10,729.80 9,744.01 (2,623.91) 76,255.86 152,074.00 75,818.14 50.14% RECREATION 37,528.70 36,338.20 8,079.11 (959.01) 93,373.40 209,908.00 116,534.60 44.48% SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 9,533.00 7,120.10 5,846.88 (2,234.18) 38,080.10 100,595.00 62,514.90 37.85% CIVIC ARENA 7,205.40 3,612.70 13,217.78 (9,605.08) 89,406.25 189,100.00 99,693.75 4718% PARK DEPARTMENT 76,676.00 81,025.50 59,060.28 21,965.22 388,608.15 671,916.00 283,307.85 57.84% RECREATION BUILDING & POOL 12,183.50 13,817.50 5,368.86 8,448.64 53,724.82 99,064.00 45,339.18 54.23% LIBRARY 2,334.90 22,563.70 22,420.58 143.12 73,939.05 112,227.00 38,287.95 65.88% CEMETERY 8,703.90 6,801.90 8,018.77 (1,216.87) 45,914.60 90,414.00 44,499.40 50.78% DEBT SERVICE 3,384.50 82,118.40 786.27 81,332.13 88,302.90 97,873.00 9,570.10 90.22% AIRPORT 3,100.60 4,966.40 1,655.35 3,311.05 18,056.83 45,270.00 27,213.17 39.89% TRANSIT 7,028.50 8,943.70 10,045.89 (1,102.19) 58,294.17 117,426.00 59,131.83 49.64% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (2,552.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV /0! UNALLOCATED 37,210.00 75,864.90 17,881.51 57,983.39 269,599.29 760,974.00 491,374.71 35.43% TOTAL 598,642.50 716,391.10 450,961.81 228,697.89 3,398,187.10 6,955,330.00 3,557,142.90 48.86% • 0 ! 1999 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT JUNE 1998 1999 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL JUNE JUNE MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING TAXES 600,000.00 654,302.22 1,787.73 652,514.49 654,302.22 1,685,972.00 1,031,669.78 LICENSES 135.00 457.00 4,114.38 (3,657.38) 24,967.00 30,200.00 5,233.00 PERMITS AND FEES 51,505.81 49,613.92 30,470.31 19,143.61 171,403.76 241,000.00 69,596.24 INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE 19,287.63 17,675.57 18,912.21 (1,236.64) 116,245.66 2,554,009.00 2,437,763.34 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 87,467.72 161,142.19 15,305.64 145,836.55 473,071.61 1,102,949.00 629,877.39 FINES & FORFEITS 3,798.07 4,200.81 6,012.01 (1,811.20) 19,172.73 65,000.00 45,827.27 INTEREST 15,239.79 46,234.13 4,864.18 41,369.96 129,832.51 50,000.00 (79,832.51) SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 2,748.70 (2,365.86) 509.35 (2,875.21) 586.72 500.00 (86.72) CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUND 1,250.00 2,132.43 195.35 1,937.08 201,107.98 1,154,050.00 952,942.02 REIMBURSEMENTS (7,938.59) (8,579.62) (2,241.44) (6,338.18) 55,274.38 71,650.00 16,375.62 SALES 500.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00 (500.00) TOTAL 773,994.13 925,312.79 79,929.71 845,383.08 1,846,464.57 6,955,330.00 5,108,865.43 0.00 General Govt. 75,609.20 106,363.30 77,342.01 29,021.29 481,459.84 1,042,661.00 561,201.16 Public Safety 180,988.70 274,435.50 137,085.23 89,886.07 1,035,724.66 2,102,176.00 1,066,451.34 Streets & Alleys 129,182.30 28,757.50 74,409.28 (45,651.78) 587,447.18 1,163,652.00 576,204.82 Parks & Recreation 155,986.80 128,139.50 123,737.50 15,134.80 813,387.63 1,534,884.00 721,496.37 Miscellaneous 56,875.50 178,695.30 38,387.79 140,307.51 480,16779 1,111,957.00 631,789.21 TOTAL 598,642.50 716,391.10 450,961.81 228,697.89 3,398,187.10 6,955,330.00 3,557,142.90 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 23- Jul -99 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY UNAUDITED -1999 SALES LIQUOR WINE BEER MISCELLANEOUS QUANTITY DISCOUNTS TOTAL COST OF SALES GROSS PROFIT ff`kF:] 05,297.66 143,531.94 702,818.57 52,929.80 (13,227.22) .291,350.75 986,703.84 304,646.91 23.59% OPERATING EXPENSE SALARIES EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OPERATING SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES SMALL TOOLS DEPRECIATION COMMUNICA UTILITIES MAINTENANCE & ALARM & CONSULTING PRINTING GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES ADVERTISING DUES & SUBSCRITIONS RENTALS MISC. TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING INCOME OTHER REVENUES /EXPENSES MISC. - Lottery Sale of Property Contributions & Donations INTEREST - INCOME INTEREST - EXPENSE TOTAL OTHER NET INCOME TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND JUNF 7.05% 91,090.01 1.62% 20,940.07 8,808.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 229.08 0.00 13,057.13 1,192.48 8,119.77 6,248.18 51.25 3,72" 6- 21,446.08 119.95 1,808.58 377.30 135,589.76 175,843.09 9.97% 128,803.83 (3,244.69) 0.00 801.12 3,667.36 (4,639.98) (3,416.19) 125,387.64 0.00 • ORDINANCE NO. 99-262 PUBLICATION NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE, DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF CERTAIN ASSETS TO RIDGEVIEW CHANHASSEN CLINIC, A MINNESOTA NON -PROFIT CORPORATION. THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: Section 1. The City Council for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the sale, transfer and disposition of certain assets owned by the City of Hutchinson, to Ridgeview Chanhassen Clinic, a Minnesota non -profit corporation, namely the W insted Family Practice Clinic along with certain equipment, contracts and trade names associated thereto. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this 27 day of July, 1998. CITY OF HUTCHINSON ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Its City Administrator Published in the Hutchinson Leader First reading: Second reading: r� Marlyn Torgerson Its Mayor CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 11263 Resolution for Exemption from Uniform Municipal contracting Law Whereas, the City of Hutchinson recognizes the importance of Year 2000 remediation, planning, and preventative actions; and Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has identified water plant control system as having problems functioning in the year 2000, due to what is commonly referred to as a Year 2000 problem; and Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has determined that the actual failure of the above mention controls are related to the delivery of water services; and Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has identified planning, remediation, and preventative actions for addressing the Year 2000 problems, as prepared by the supplier of said control, Quality Flow Systems; and Whereas, the costs of said actions would normally be subject to the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law, Minn. Stat. Sec. 471.345; and Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has determined that there is an urgency to implementing these actions as identified in this resolution on order to prevent an impact on the infrastructure or delivery of municipal services; and Whereas, such urgency is heightened by the constrained time schedule given by Quality Flow Systems; and Whereas, any delay in the implementation of these actions would pose a threat to the public and delivery of municipal water supply; Therefore, be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson hereby determines that the planning, remediation, and preventative efforts identified in this resolution shall be exempt from the Uniform Municipal Contracting law, Minn. Stat. Sec. 471.345, pursuant to 1999 Minn. Laws Ch. 250, Art. 2, Section 6; and 0 Resolution number 11263 Page 2 Be if further resolved, that staff shall take all necessary and appropriate measures to implement the planning, remediation, and preventative actions for addressing the Year 2000 problems as it relates to the municipal water supply. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of Juy, 1999. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin Torgerson Mayor APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 1. Name of Applicant e od Cc 7 tai' 4 S S V ( q 4 Address 2. Organization r� / fi/borfrc� // Address �fou P ti -t�.�� �cit' ltu�cli,t�;o�i) s53 S z 3. Location & Time Z, Are' -/0" .0 q�y 4. Date of Dance c(Qu_ U 5. Band Already BoBooked Ak �e' C G. Name of Band -dS Q17.,g y e -e oe x,, Misr 7. Have you run dances m Hutchinson before? S Elsewhere? �t) Signature of Applicant 8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: zxy" Q � 9. Action of City Council: 10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *: *(Payable in Advance) g vdj 46QW(„Q - 6/99 0Aln DA1D ? ' 1999 1 1 - 1 , 1999 r: =.� iuL 14 1999 CITY Ur HUTCHINSON APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 1. NameofApplicant 326 -ss L-2- 6'2 Address /3 C� /G fl ST /� < _ ( 3LEi)r,6P 2. Organization Address �. Location &Time G014!?� RQ�,ihrQ1 0 4. Date of Dance A (1 < 5. Band Already Booked 6. Name of Band S O � ) N ot_ 7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? N (� Elsewhere? Signature of Applicant 8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: - / Vd J � - 9. Action of City 10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *: *(Payable in Advance) - 6/99 to RE-CEMED IL 1 4 1494 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT Cl ui- HUTCHINSON FEE $50.00 1. Name of Applicant _ �: `� , {1 L r� C 1 0 37.0 �6 5 Address 2. Organization Address 3. Location & Time Aa A 1 0 t AL l'r ).g 2A n r, 0 �� 4. Date of Dance ,/�� /, _� Ti; �2z C4 (,L G,) 5. Band Already Booked \ y 1 U NN �� 6i - Name ofBand ! \ k C y N 7. Have you ran dances in Hutchinson before? Elsewhere? Signature of App 'cant 8 Recommendation of of Police: ye �N _ 9. Action of City Council: 10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired (S32/Hr.) *: *(Payable in Advance) 6/99 X y K o � Sa G —zg�9R RECEIVED APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERT FEE $50.00 --rn �-:`-HUTCHINSOry* C° 1. Name of Applicant -� S E �� �� tF7C� /2 �(c ''- 3 1 Address 2. Organization Address 3. Location & Time N DTI () N A J- 4. Date of Dance Sef- 1Ze P � S W Ito rytui 6. Name of Band 7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? 1 Elsewhere? \ Signature of Applicant 8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: LUM La ` Ap g�� & C: 10. Action of City Council: Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32 *(Payable in Advance) 6/99 m 0 I - `! RECioF+';? UI. 3999 CITY pr HUI CHINSON • APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 1. Name of Applicant —sOc�E ���L/'0 ( - ,5 - Address �ri,F' 6iFR,r 2. Organization Address 3. Location & Time N r11 co t4 t� A_i")1,,� +. Date of Dance 5. Band Already Booked X E t o u Nf�s 6. Name of Band P I E)( ac> <.j N f�N 7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? N D Elsewhere? !1 P P lo Signature of Applicant 8 Recom m mendation of Chief Police: PaOM� L�4J 4V-Zr � C 4d7 - Nd JTa(' }J 9. Action of City Council: 10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *: *(Payable in Advance) . - 6/99 D --1 /� -2 CITY OF HUTCHINSON POLICE SERVICES TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Steve Madson, Director of Police/Emergency Mgt. DATE: July 16, 1999 RE: Out of State Training Request Services' I have been invited to attend the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children Chief Executive Officer training course. The course will be conducted on September 19-20, 1999 at the Jimmy Ryce Law Enforcement Training Center in Arlington, VA. The course relates directly as to how law enforcement should respond to child abductions or exploited children cases, the resources that are available and how to deal with the high impact of major media attention. The course fees are bome by the National Center and most of the travel costs are also. I would anticipate driving my personal vehicle to the course, which would require one night lodging out and back. The only expenses I would ask the city to pay would be the two nights lodging. I think this is a tremendous opportunity to obtain outstanding and relevant training in a very sensitive area and, therefore, request approval to attend. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum, please contact me at your earliest convenience. /Ikg cc: Gary Plotz, City Administrator 99 -01 -0005 111 '-p cunov Tuom _ t 1 nn nn turn ne. PMAM "ON SALE" 11 *tote of jftnootd, COUNTr OP..__t1 GSty To the., .............. C.Ity .. GowRG.;U .................... Of the .......... G.Uy ...................... of .... m. Sc;h msn............... .............................................................. ..............................+ to of Minnesota: hereby appl*&.. for a hearse for the 6enw of- L/ZL usF a from _-2 18 99_, to sell At Retail Only, Non- intorieating Malt Liquors, as the same am defined by law, for consumption ' 0,o a certain pm nbse her denribed as follwa, at whiah plea said applieant_yppuo,_ tU bud,,, and to that and rspeant__cnd star. as fa3wos: I 1 J "se. r .n. ,.es� s o. a � .,ermbri Reco®end approval with restrictions and requireniailts as in the past. Driver's License I.D. to be required for purchase. Se ve Hadsan, Police Chief Each applicant further states that _he is not now the holder of, nor has —he mode application for, nor does ___he intend to make application for a Federal Setaii Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of intoxicating liquor. • That said applicant_' . ._.af the United Stabs; of joad maul aharaotor and repute; and ha_..__ atinin r the ajs of 11 yeas; thud__.__._._..._...._._. proprietor_-..uf the establishment for whrah the Uns as rill be issued if this applio am b jranead. That no manufaotu er of soak nondnta —&kxjf malt liquors has any ownerddp, in whole or in part, in said business of said applicant or any Ent~ therein; That said applioa,t._maka._lhb appUoaU= pursuant and subfset so all the laws Of As State of Minnesota and the ordinansM and rejalatia r of raid_.L appiicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby atm --io oiwroe and obey the some; Doted_ ° jg am ll 2 1 1999 crt«num ew 1ppl6sa,1._ P.O. � "Z' Hutchinson City Center • DATE: July 21, 1999 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, NIN 553542522 324587 -51S VFm 320-2344240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON TO CONSTRUCT A 26' X 36' POLE TYPE GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON STREET SE. Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On June 16, 1999, Randy and Edith Carlson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a 26' x 36' pole type garage on then property at 426 Huron Street. The property is zoned R2 and is approximately 8,712 square feet (.20 acres). The site plan provides the pole building will be 6 feet from the adjoining property line, 10 feet off of the alley, and 30 feet from the south property line. The extra distance on the south line is to allow for a side entrance for the three -car building. The height of the building would not exceed 16 feet, as required by the code. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 8, 1999. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The building materials be similar to the existing duplex. 2. The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly. TERMS: City reserves the right to review all conditional use permits at their discretion. Respectfully submitted, William Arndt, Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission C� cc: Randy and Edith Carlson, 426 Huron St. S.E., Hutchinson, MN 55350 Printed on recycled paper - 0 d I H L , Rk Ave SE Indicates Location of Property Aw Higkkgktpd Properties krdfcate motke area j3501 4 f ,4 OKI Higkkgktpd Properties krdfcate motke area j3501 0 3 q4- par sgu". - I er Su 4k Y- � fa 2< 0 7s -tW , 4S vo-v W . r yvo A/Z Numn Straf SZ^ V C 77 - � C, r rt M y L ,oS I 1 � I i y 7 U 'o M y L ,oS I 1 � I i y 7 U i A W z l.t �jo --:� C-\ OLX i Y\S�eCA 0 �), Lo�oyc�- �De- - -�(:) rv V ho+i se. Co�oA(5� i )1 -1 RESOLUTION NO. 11264 RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 10.12 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON, TO CONSTRUCT A 26' x 36' POLE TYPE GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON STREET S.E. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN: FINDINGS Randy and Edith Carlson, have made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 10.12 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct a 26' x 36' pole type garage located in the R -2 (Multiple family residence) District at 426 Huron St. S.E.. with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 45 South 1 /2 City 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent 0 of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: The building materials be similar to the existing duplex. The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly. Adopted by the City Council this 27' day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 9 Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor T _ I _ Hutchinson City Center I 11 u DATE: July 21, 1999 111 H---n Stmt SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320.587- 5151/Fu 320.230 -4240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER TO CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL TO BE LOCATED IN AN VC (INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On June 17, 1999, Curtis and Janel Reiter submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a veterinary hospital at 760 Century Avenue SW. The site is currently vacant. The proposed building is 4,800 square feet. • The property is approximately 68,750 square feet or 1.58 acres. The theater is located to the west and Clock Tower Plan is located to the east. 0 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 8, 1999. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requ of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The plan was revised and submitted on July 20, 1999, to provide the required setback from the interior property line; and additional tree location; and screening for the northern portion of the property. 2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building. 3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking requirements would need to be reviewed. TERMS: City reserves the right to review all conditional use permits at their discretion. Respectfully submitted, William Arndt, Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Curtis and Janel Reiter, 715 Goebel St. S.W., Hutchinson, MN 55350 Primed on recycled paper- # �! .) —Z Indicates Location of Property N7ghHghted Properties bdieate notice area (350') L' krt,5 % -dane I2el 4ec- 0 `t rtV� . L C''(1 tir r� �J S SITE PLAN RESOLUTION NO. 11265 RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 8.13 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER, TO CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVE. S.W. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS • Curtis and Janel Reiter, have made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.13 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct an approximately 5,000 sq. ft. veterinary hospital located in the I/C (Industrial/Commercial) District at 760 Century Ave. S.W. with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East '' /z Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds Addition 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent • of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the fo `Hawing conditions: 1. The plan was revised to provide the required setback from the interior property line; and additional tree location; and screening for the northern portion of the property. Submitted 7 -20-99 2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building. 3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking requirements would need to be reviewed. Adopted by the City Council this 27i day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor • • C Center 11111 n Street SE Hutchlmmn, MN 55350.2522 320.587- 5151/Fn 320.234 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 21, 1999 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF 130'X 30' PORTION OF STREET DEDICATED FOR PUBLIC USE LYING SOUTH OF LOT 6, IN STUCKE'S 1 ST ADDITION. Pursuant to Section 5.972 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planing Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request. Legal Description: 130' X 30' portion of street lying south of Lot 6, Block 1, Stucke's 1st Addition l r� u HISTORY The applicant is requesting the allowance of vacation of platted right of way located in Stucke's I st Addition. It appears that there was a vacation of this right of way at some point in the past, but there is no documentation of the vacation. The issue arose at the closing for one of the properties. FINDINGS OF FACT Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 8 and Tuesday July 13, 1999. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the vacation. CONDITIONS: None Respectfully Submitted, William Arndt, Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Ron McGraw Printed on recycled paper - � -�'F) ,-� STUCKE'S ; st ADDITION TO r ' t ,J ' W I Y 6 J 49. 5 90.5 - _ LEWIS AVE 130 3 4 30 9 0 0 0 O 5 O I • I B I 10o N 70.5 ° m 4 2 0 7 I r 0 2 0 O 6 I 30 30 111 90.5 SCALE I inch a 100 fr'et STATE OF MINNESOTA ��• COUNTY OF- ?AcLEOD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, LEWIS H. MERRILL. AND THIS PLAT IS A. CORRECT REPRESENTATION 0 CERTIFY THAT THS'OUTSIDE BOUNDARIES ARE CORF WERE MADE ON THE GROUND AND ARE CORRECTLY S 0 r .�IV�r• a oSVo o 2 o co 170 0 3 o eSSf b m , v e a osby o OSia m 4 co o '.7 so p ' It ,5 m �4's rD O 4 t N 0700 X117.811 1 30 90 0 A A • ` N V � O ST. ANASTASIA . CA HOLIC S HOOL 0 e 17 g v � iuv �1 o7Z o A 7 DST o I ! 12 3 r • �[•:• 4 4�)--� C L-1 DATE: July 22, 1999 Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson- NN 55350 -2522 320 - 587- 5151/Fa 320- 2344240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4 ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK LOCATED WEST OF ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 1 ST ADDITION. The Planning Commission approved the final plat to be known as Island View Heights 4"' Addition with the following conditions: 1. Adequate access must be maintained during construction for the purposes of entering the property for emergency services. 0 cc: Bill Gilk, Scenic Heights Investments, Box 1176, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Pnntcd . recyd,d paper - 4 -(F) .4 i ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION 5 534. O e _ _..__.._.___- ___ ______ ___ ___ ___ a x rvmdm {____ - - AC6f _ _ 328 by 8 a 's 'S'p i - 0p•00° YA\ 3 \ � \ a *' ,,, ,� y"b s ,sm x•., a -a 2108" t, 0 tr"� •A6a348'� �.. «oxy st • „4ism 9 N i n "a:45g p3G8, j 1 7 .f tb 2� / p ° Y� ° +• 8 v I ax°. C � . ?! �vj � °p v . i s3a� � ' �U fir i , \ w b s, isu °n I r" 2a ll # ns"'� 1{ 8.:4?, m .G 4 to i 1 32 es w ��� r � S7 O is a 8 Y el S a 12 G ' s ,rzK 43 ✓ " °` sµ�" .. v ,.t { 8. °°° 1 „°aD° n31 8. a r l .f` � •8 p`�°1'� Z x 3 8 "e p°a a a a� iY Z w I 38 I C 40 J C ar r 50 axx : ' x _' S a a 6 °s.. rv. 51 t a w, „� I -n nt8 " ��'.2 8 esoo� un.'wY brxra B 3 @a �41 vn .. vLV A g RA IS g e. ^ ev M y2$ -p $a 5 Vim° .. .... 1 \ ° k a`e 3 C E 17S M lfl' _ - A $ ".271 R i � tk �;� 6 e w .r " � a.w H 4 R _. e.^8'"xveT m a 4 5t• .e6 'Y3 ' ° a Car r ^s;`•�8458 • �8'a,n, °• k h/ I 4t ° "° •' Jp,z7 "nos % e g $ E g 4'�s mo asa a ' ,r %rri 2. m.iro 8' S 17 44 N66' 9 52 - W tie � - X87 f,p R �' r 4 � j 7 p � 0 ' 0 a '.� $� a +: , 4 , .s . ia'� ° avi I I r.� - --- ----- — S 0171'35'26' —`�a� 41 b. p,'"��,.9e m 1 i� \0,t•A/ e n I I / 821 228 4'. 8 ?� , �.�'C;" \ \ ; i I / / t'.AKE 1 � r ------------ I II I I 1 I -� A_IOOVOY' Di i�l 1 i• / I I ae✓• ^. 1 I 1 I I I \ I I b l w l w. Mw Ine weal BENa UMM M" in IrAn x I, , 0 +I "� HEw ICGX6 Icp °I .h..°II °t IM Ir 4'( -i 0 0 F- -I L __A Cv �O a� 0 Q LYNN T ->16N R -3011 I�1 U RESOLUTION NO. 11266 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAIN VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION LOCATED ALONG PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE S' WHEREAS, Mr. Bill Gilk, Scenic Heights Investments., has submitted a fmal pi- . be known as ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION of said subdivision in the manner required platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had there.. �r, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and tf� _alations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of 1 T. .:,son and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-wit; Legal Description: Oudot A, Island View Heights Third Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the McLeod Counth Recorder, McLeod County Recorder, McLeod County, Minnesota BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That said fmal plat of ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following conditions: Adequate access must be maintained during construction for the purposes of entering the property for emergency services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon said plat by Mayor and City Administrator, as required, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City Officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of July, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Mayor orgerson 0 # -(r)- �L HUTCHI T e N PLL NNII G 1 MMISSION FOR YOUR W 2. The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Bill Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Dave Westlund, Jim Haugen, Jeff Jones, Dean Krchoff, and Jeff Haag. Absent Dean Wood. Also present Julie Wischnack, Director of Planning and Zoning; Bonnie Baumetz, Planning and Zoning; Richard Schieffer, City Legal Counsel; John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering; Mark Hensen, Building Official; and Dolf Moon, Director of Parks and Recreation CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA a) CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING DATED JUNE 15, 1999 Mr. Westund made a motion to approve the minutes. Seconded by Mr. Haag the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON TO CONSTRUCT A 26'X 36' POLE TYPE GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON ST. Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:34 p.m. with the reading of publication 86038 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Baumetz explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a conditional use permit to construct a 26' x 36' pole type garage located at 426 Huron Street SE. The property is zoned R -2 and is approximately 8,712 square feet (.20 acres). The site plan provides the pole building will be 6 feet from the adjoining property line, 10 feet off of the alley, and 30 feet from the south property line. The extra distance on the south line is to allow for a side entrance for the three-car building. The height of the building would not exceed 16 feet, as required by the code. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The building materials to be similar to the existing duplex. 2. The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly. Mr. Westiund moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Krchoff, the hearing closed at 5:40 p.m. Mr. Westlund made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Kirchoff. The motion carried unanimously. b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE-PERMIT _REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER TO CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATED IN AN VC DISTRICT AT 760 CENTURY AVE_ SW Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:41 p.m. with the reading of publication #6039 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Wischnack said the property owners are requesting a conditional use permit to construct a veterinary hospital at the above listed address. The site is currently vacant. The proposed building is 4,800 square feet. The property is approximately 68,750 square feet or 1.58 acres. The theater is located to the west and Clock Tower Plaza is located to the east. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit because it meets the review criteria of Section 6.07 (132). Approval would be with the following conditions: • 1. The plan is revised to provide the required setback from the interior property line; an additional tree location; and screening for the northern portion of the property. (A revised plan was submitted July 20, 1999.) 2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building. 3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking requirements would need to be reviewed. Curtis Reiter said the plan submitted is the final plan. In the future, they do have plans to sell off 120' for another lot Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Kirchoff the hearing closed at 5:46 p.m. Mr. Haag made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Kirchoff the motion carried unanimously. C) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED IN STUCKE'S FIRST ADDITION Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of publication 7!6040 as published in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999. Ms. Baumetz said the request is for the allowance of vacation of platted right way located in Stucke'se Addition. It appears that there was a vacation of this right of way at some por° in the past, but there is no documentation of the vacation. The issue arose at the closing for one of the prop_rtfes. Staff is recommending the vacation procedures be followed again, to provide a reaffirmation of the vacated right of way. The county doesn't have record of vacation. Virgil Antony, 335 Charles Street, asked if the vacation included the T strip on h;s property. Ms. Baumetz said she would research the records and contact him. Mr. Antony was in favor of vacating the 7' strip. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Haag the hearing closed at 5:52 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommenc;.:ons. Seconded by Mr. Westiund the motion carried unanimou 4. NEW BUSINESS a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4 TH ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK Ms. Wrschnack explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a final plat to be known as Island View Heights 0 Addition. The preliminary plat provided for 28 - 2 unit structures and 1 -3 unit strictures. The final plat presents 25 - 2 unit structures (50 units). Since the units have changed, staff has requested final grading infomratlon. The location of the units are different than previously presented. Addftionalty, elevation infomtatton must be provided for each unit A previously constructed storm water pond is located on the southeast portion of the final plat Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the following conditions: 1. A blanket easement must be granted for Lot 51, for access by the utility companies. 2. Setbacks for the Fourth Addition will be a 20 foot setback from right of way and a 5 foot setbacK f the interior drainage and utility easement (private street). 3. Final grading information must be submitted to verify elevation information for the proposed units. 4. Verification that the bottom elevations of the storm water pond are at the same level as provided In the grading plans. If the elevations do not match, the extra siltation must be removed. (Applicant stated he was checking 7!6/99.) 5. Sedimentation on the existing streets and in the storm sewers due to construction activities must be remedied and erosion control measures taken to protect existing infrastructure. -- 6. Adequate access must be maintained daring construction for the purposes of entering Theproperty for emergency services. - - -- Staff is recommending a 5' setback otherwise the conditions have been met Staff has verification of elevations, sift fencing is in place and the streets are cleaned. No. 6 is a new condition. Bill Gilk, developer, said this is a twin home development with lots 35' wide 70' deep. They are specialty designed with 0" lot line setback. The request for 5' setback has been in the last 30 days. This is a untimely request. He was not notified at the April 19"' preconstruction meeting. Mr. Gilk felt it is untimely change after the city has approved 25 twin home sites. It is an added expense to correct a previously agreed upon utility easement. John Rodeberg said there is a potential risk allowing homes to be built very close totha utiltiy fine, but not a major concern. If footings on the property within the 5' setback were back dropped it would be a reasonable setback. John Rodeberg said they would go back and address the lots in question on an individual basis. Mr. Haag made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat with condition Item No. 6. Seconded by Mr. Kirchoff the motion carried. Haag, Kirchoff, Jones, and Arndt casting approval votes and Wesbund and Haug disapproval. 5. OLD BUSINESS Accessory building at 546/550 Miller Ms. Wschnack explained the building being constructed is 1,260 sf. on a vacant lot. A conditional use permit is required for structures over 1,000 sf. The conditional use permit was reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 18, 1999. No public comment was received. Planning Commission recommended approval. City Council reviewed the information and approved the permit on May 25, 1999. The building permit was approved on June 18, 1999. Complaints were received regarding building size, height, possible siding, height of garage doors, possible use, etc. She also explained the definition of a pole barn as a building with a frame made of wood or metal parts, with metal panels covering three or more sides and without a full foundation. This building contains a full foundation: therefore is not defined as a pole bam, regardless of its exterior materials. Ms. Wischnack explained there are no violations of the code except for Height: 165 (6° too high). The size — over 1000 sf. has been approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are no restrictions on garage door height. The applicant has stated it will be used for personal storage. Bruce Briggs, 540 Miller Ave. SW, presented a petition objecting to the construction. He thought it was going to be a garage that fits in the area. He feels construction equipment will be stored in the garage, and doesn't think steel siding is consistent with a garage. He also thought this large building might have an adverse affect on their property values. He doesn't want steel vertical siding. A Bill K, neighboring property owner on Linden Ave., said he sees no probtem_with steel siding, and feels once grade level is attained this structure follows city code. Bruce Briggs said you cannot change grade level to negatively impact the drainage on neighboring property. Bill Mathews said he is willing adjust the height of the building to 16' by cutting it down at the plate. He also said the steel siding would be bordered at the bottom with a darker colored wainscoating for a more attractive appearance. Bruce Briggs said water run off a huge building as this will cause a problem. Roger Bakken, 750 Lynn Rd., said the city has a drain in the alley to remedy the drainage problem. He has read the notices in the paper and does not have problem with the garage. • Dick Schieffer, legal counsel, said the Planning Commission should pass along to the City Council the objections of the neighboring property owners. There has been no request to revoke the permit so the Planning Commission cannot make a recommendation to revoke the permit Their responsibility is to give an information report to the City Council. Staff should prepare minutes to refect all concerns of the neighboring property owners. Bill Mathews asked the stop work order be lifted, so he can make corrections. Ms. Wschnack said the request for stop work order to be lifted should be in writing. Mr. Hensen, Building Official said the framing inspection will be the point at which the height is reverified. Mr. Westlund made a motion for staff to submit a report including Mr_ Mathews' resolutions to Council seconded by Mr. Kirchoff. The motion carried unanimously. 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF a) PRESENTATION BY DOLF MOON, DIRECTOR OF PARK, REC AND COMMUNITY ED, AND JOHN RODEBERG, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, REGARDING FUTURE AND EXISTING TRAILS b) DISCUSSION OF STREET NAME CHANGE ALONG ADAMS ST.lHWY 22 John Rodeberg is proposing existing Hwy 22 be changed to County Rd 7 and change Adams Street to Bluff Street. Staff will send out a survey regarding changing Adams Street to Bluff Street. • Jeff Haag asked if Lewis Ave. SW could be considered for a one -way west bound street. Mr. Rodeberg said property owners should submit a petition requesting the change. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m. PUBLICATION NO. 6041 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029 LETTING NO. 41PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99 -04 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 6:00 P.M. on the 27th day of July, 1999, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of: Project No. 99 -03 Century Avenue SW from Sunset Street SW to Dale Street SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances; Project No. 99-04 Dale Street SW from Century Avenue SW Extension to South Grade Road SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances; You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, • 1999. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31 st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 10 percent (plus or minus) per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until November 15, 1999. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 745,552.58 . Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has • — further questions. s--,A PUBLICATION NO. 6041 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 6029 LETTING NO. 4/ PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99-04 PAGE 2 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witness: or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure i questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objeci witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, V ay be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the C .;"cil. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. /Gary D. Plotz/ Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, JULY 13TH, 1999 AND TUESDAY, JULY 20TH, 1999. E W • 4 COMP BY, G IOCE ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029 TE TR , ?G NO.4/PROJP.CT NO.49-03 & 99-01 99-03: CENTURY AVE SW FROM SUNSET ST SW TO DALE ST SW 194h DALE ST SW FROM CENTURY AVE SW EXTENSION TO SOUTH GRADE RD SW BY CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER Y SERVICES, WATERMAIN 6 SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, BITITKINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, 7RATJSIDEWAI% AND APPURTENANCES $ 30.00 SANITARY SEVER COST PER FRONT FOOT COMPUTED BY: G RICE $ 30.00 WATERMAIN COS[ PER FRONT' FOOT CHECKED BYE 1. RODEBERG S 65.00 STREET /STORM SEWER COST PER FRONT FOOT NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 $ 15.00 GRADTNG/PREP COST PER FRONT FOOT ADOPTED, INTEREST RATE, ACCOUNT NO. CITY PI3 NO. NAME ft ADDRESS OPR OWNEL LLGALDISIk@lDON ADDITION OR SUWT'6iCN1 FRONT 14!Ei' 1N4.[. ARY Y WATEKhV0N STREET& 516WM Z*m GRADING PRbNTEELT GRADING TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY NO. 1 12.11630-02-0450 CROW RIVER APARTMENTS 575 CENTURY AVE SW LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 511 COLEFAX ST LOT I EX TRACT APPROX 205' X 215' P O BOX 367 IN NE CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, 23.421.0020 AUGUSTA WI 54722 CENTURY COURT 70076 $ 21,022.91 S 45,549.40 700.76 S 10,511.40 $ 95,106.40 2 12- 11630039010 CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN 1040 SOUT1i GRADE RD SW 1040 SOUTH GRADE RD SW P O BOX 369 5.73 AC IN NE 1/4 NW 1/4 LYING EAST OF M1,022.80 23.012.0200 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SAR /7, SECTION 12 -11630 235 $ 7,050.00 S 15,275.00 0 S - $ 29,375.00 3 12- 11630039030 DOUGLAS K PAULA IVSELMANN 1010 DALE ST SW 1010DALESTSW 76 AC OF NE I/4 SW 1/4 23.012.1200 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12 -11630 149 $ 4,470.00 S 4,470.00 S 9,685.00 0 S - $ 18,625.00 4 12. 11630034010 J. M. & L. E. DANIELSON TRUST 1060 DALE ST SW J OSEPH K L.E. DANIP.LSON CO. 1060 DALE ST SW 1.50 AC OF I/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.012.1300 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12.11670 1405 f 4,215.00 S 4,215.00 $ 9,13250 0 S - $ 17,562.50 5 12.11630930050 J. M. k L. E. DANIELSON TRUST 1085 DALE ST SW J OSEPH K L.E. DANIELSON CO. 1060 DALE ST SW 5.90 AC I/ NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.012.1400 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12.11630 861.5 $ 25,845.00 S 25,845.00 $ 55,997.50 355.57 $ 5,33355 $ 113,021.05 6 12- 11630-034)060 RICHARD k TERISA DOSTAL 1020 DALE ST SW 1020 DALE ST SW 2.23 AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.0111300 HUI'CHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12.11630 117.9 $ 5,637.00 $ 5,637.00 $ 12,213.50 0 S - S 23,48750 7 12.1163003-0070 PEARLY k G. CHRISTE SEN 1050 DALE ST SW 1050 DALE ST SW 1 AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.012-1600 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12 -11630 1405 $ 4,215.00 $ 4,215.00 $ 9,132.50 0 $ - $ L7,%2-SO 8 12. 1163003-0080 PEARLY SI G. CHRLS7ENSFN 1040 DALE ST SW 1050 DALE ST SW I AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.012.1700 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12 -11630 139.1 $ 4,173.00 $ 4,173.00 S 9,041.50 0 $ - S 17}87.50 9 12- 11630-03-0110 IROBERT K KAREN PETERSON IIODDDALESTSW 16 GROVE ST SW 12.42 AC OF W 112 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 SA- 5029 - Pop 1 of 2 i 0 s COMPILED BY: G. RICE ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. SOD LETTING N0.4 /PROJECT NO.55.03 lY ".04 99-05: CENTURY AVE SW FROM SUNSET ST SW TO DALE ST SV 99-06 DAIS ST SV FROM CENTURY AVE SW EXTH4AON TO SOUTH GRADE RD SW 3Y CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEVER, SANITARY SEVER & SERVICES, VAT'RMAIN It SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, TRAIVSIDEVALK AND APPURTENANCES S 50.00 SANITARY SEVER COST PER FROM FOOT COMPUTED BY, C. RICE $ 50.00 VATFRMAIN COST PER FRONT FOOT CHECKED BY: J. RODERERG S 65.00 STREET/STORM SEVER COST PER PROM FOOT NUMBER OP YI I^ ADOPTED. _.. _ -.— .. - $ 15.00 GRADING /PREP COST PER FRONT FOOT "UB It ADDRESS . ^Tp - J HUTC1i1NSO: IEGAL DISOIFFIGN ADDITION OR SUBI)rn% N PRONE FEET SAEITART SEVER I VATTRMAIN STREET It STORM SEVER GRADING FRONT FEET GRADING TOTAL ACTIVE AMZSSMHNT T' •'.11430 - <- - TRACTS C k 6 OF NC:i? - ?.:': :/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 EX 180 $ 5,400.00 S 5,400.00 S 11,700.00 0 S - f 22,500.00 10 12- 1143003-0120 WELCOME TO OUR HOME LLC. 44572230TH ST 27.0121200 MORGAN MN 56266 575 AC, SECC' -_ '-!2-11&3014.50 ACRES 719.07 3 21,572.10 $ 21,572.10 S 46,739.55 719.07 S 10 .786.05 S 100,669.50 11 12- 114304)40010 DERRICK INVESTMENT NO. 91 INC 7301 OHMS LN 8560 40.92 AC OF S V2 NW 1/4 23.012.2125 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55439 SECTION 12 -11430 1080.81 S 32,42430 S 32,424.30 S 70,252.65 1050.81 $ 16,212.15 $ 151,313.40 12 12- 1143007-0020 MCLEOD COUN'T'Y AG ASSN 880 CEN'TURY AVE SW P O BOX 142 LOT 2 EX THE E200', BLOCK 1, 27.319.0020 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION 65071 S 20,421.30 S 20,42130 S 44,246.15 68011 5 10,210.65 S 95,299.40 13 12- 11430-03-0090 JEFFREY THOMAS TRAXLER 1055 DALE ST SW 1 1055 DALE ST SW TRACT D OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 27.012.1800 HUICHINSON MN 55350 SECTION 12 -11430 187.9 $ 5,637.00 $ 5,637.00 S 12,213.50 0 $ - $ 27,487 -50 14 12. 11430-03 -0100 MARY WHITE 1065 DAIS ST SW 1065 DALE ST SW SUT F N820.64' OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 23.0121900 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 LYING E OF CSAH /7, SECTION 12.11430 137 S 4,110.00 S 4,110.00 S 8,905.00 0 S - S 17,125.00 TOTAL • ASSESSMENT ROLL 5029 553975 S 166,192.50 $ 166,192.50 $ 360,069.751 $ 53,053.80 $ 745,52258 SA -5029 - Page 2 of 2 C 11 Hutchinson City Center 111 Hu n Street SE Hutchln m MN 55350 -2522 320 - 587 - 5151X• 320- 2444240 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Century Avenue and Dale Street (Letting No. 4/Project No. 99 -03 and 99 -04) DATE: July 27, 1999 We have had a number of issues and concerns arise in verbal and written format that need to be addressed. I though it would be best to respond to all issues in one memorandum for discussion purposes. After discussion with the Council, individual responses need to be completed to the appropriate parties. Related letters are attached for your information. ASSESSMENTS General Issues • • The per foot rate proposed is at the very low end of the current cost to build complete residential utility and street improvements. This rate does not reflect the added cost of the grading, which is normally completed be the Developer prior to the City becoming involved. It also does not include the removal of the existing roadway, or the extensive storm sewer improvements needed. We are assessing added cost on Century Avenue for grading. The City is paying for approximately half the actual cost to complete the work. I can not recommend lowering the per foot cost, but understand that the Council may want to review issues related to benefit vs. cost. • The assessments to properties are essentially high because of the size of the lots. Most lots are 140' or more in width, while a standard City lot is 66 to 80 feet in width. Most of these lots are not subdividable, and do not meet the 250' lot width criteria in our policy for newly annexed lots to have a portion of the lot deferred. • Since the road is at an angle to the street, we in general utilized the narrowest measurement of rectangular lots, and average widths of irregularly- shaped lots, to determine the assessable footage. This policy reduced the potential frontage on virtually all properties. • Most, if not all. of these properties have non - certified septic systems which are inadequately treating sewage and/or depositing untreated sewage in the area. Pearly and Genevieve Christiansen (1050 Dale Street) The Christiansen's own two adjacent lots, each approximately 140' in width. Due to the way the road splits the property, the northern lot has virtually no frontage on Dale Street, being separated by a very small portion of property owned by the neighbor to the north. The Christiansen's do not feel that the northern lot should be assessed at all. since it has no direct access and no direct frontage. In • m discussions it was noted that the current lot is unbuildable without sewer and water, and without some type of access. It is our proposal to make the assessment deferred until the lot is buildable. Therefore if the lot remains undeveloped, no assessment is due. However, if the lot is developed the cost of the assessments reflects the added value of the lot becoming buildable. Primed m mycled paper - �— A r '1 U Lucille and Merlyn Danielson The Danielson's own two properties, each with substantial frontage. The smaller lot with the 11, on it fronts on Dale Street. The lot actually has several hundred feet of frontage, but the sou n portion of the lot is lowland, and the lot has an irregular shape. We are proposing to assess the 1h of that portion of the lot used for the house, which is similar in width to other residential lot .the area. The larger, undeveloped lot is east of Dale Street at the corner with Century Avenue. We gave the lot a corner credit of 150' (not standard policy for undeveloped property) due to its unusual shape, and also averaged lot widths. Upon further review we did not appropriately credit the parcel for right -of -way width and would recommend reducing the deferred assessment on Dale Street by 60 front feet, and the assessment on Century Avenue by 33 front feet. This would reduce the assessment from $113,021.05 to $100,901.05 (a reduction of $12,120). Residential lot rates have typical run in the $45,000 to 60,000 /acre range based on '/< acre lots. This rate is well less than half of that cost. We agree that it is a substantial sum, however it does not appear to he excessive in comparison to value -added to the parcel for development purposes. Richard and Teresa Dostal The Dostal's have a large lot which has over 200 feet of frontage and over 400 feet of depth. The parcel could be subdivided in the future into more than one lot. We adjusted (reduced) the front footage to the narrowest width of the lot (187.9'). Since the lot is less than 250' in width it does not qualify for the current deferral policy. We would recommend consideration of deferring a portion • of the assessment due to he irregular shape of the lot, however the total value of the assessments to the parcel does not appear to be in excess of the long -range value to the parcel. Trail Location The property owner's on the west side of the road have petitioned to move the trail to the east side of the road. We believe that the west side is the appropriate location because: • The sidewalk/trail location on Dale Street north of South Grade Road is on the west side of the street. Since the road is shifted to the west to provide more room for the trail north of South Grade Road, shifting the trail to the east side south of South Grade Road would cause the roads to be misaligned. • The Dale Street and South Grade Road intersection is at a skew, creating more difficult site lines, and more complicated turning movements and pedestrian crossing locations. Moving the trail to the east side would require two crossings at this intersection, while leaving it on the west side would only require one crossing. Based on our initial and follow -up review, we strongly support our original plan to have the trail on the west side of Dale Street. cc: Gary Plotz —City Adminis=or Cal Rice. John Olson— Engineering/Public Works file: 19991L4 • • July 12,1999 To: City Council City of Hutchinson, Mn Dear City Council: The subject of this letter is the proposed Project No.99 -04 Dale Street improvements and to address the issues we have concerning the assessments on property at 1050 and 1040 Dale Street. We own both lots, with our home located on the southern, 1050 Dale property. The 1040 Dale lot has always been vacant, connects to the 1050 lot, and is used only for gardening and for our grandchildren's recreation. Our issue is that the proposed assessment is nearly identical (within $175) on the two lots, while the value of the two is clearly not identical. The 1040 Dale property has no street frontage, it is located behind (west of) the neighboring lot (1020 Dale), and no part of the 1040 lot has any connection to the street, so it is not possible to build another home on this lot. We also believe that since there is no street frontage and no legal access, the proposed improvements to Dale Street have no value to this property. We are retired seniors on a fixed income and have no intention of selling, dividing or making access available to this lot, so no additional city services will be required.When the time comes that these properties are sold, they will be sold as one parcel. We request that the assessment be reevaluated and reduced to only reflect the exposure of the property to Dale Street. Comparisons to, assessments on other property in the area which also • have conditions making an entire lot undividable and unbuildable convince us that adjustments can be made fairly and without breaking precedent. The adjusted front footage process used on other properties which have more actual front footage than being assessed for should also be applied in the case here where we have less actual front footage than the proposed assessment. By applying the logic used to arrive at the adjusted front footage on other properies due to portions having an "unbuildable' ' status, the lot at 1040 Dale St should also be considered as unbuildable since there is no access. If the lots were covered under one legal description rather than individual ones, certainly adjustments to the front footage would be justified, so we believe that should be the case here. We feel we are unfairly being asked to pay for 279.6 ft of street frontage, when in fact we only own 140.5 ft. The additional $17,387.50 is a tremendous amount to pay for improvements and access to services which this property does not need and will not use, now or in the future, regardless of who owns it. Please consider these issues, as the proposed assessments are unacceptable to us. Sincerely, f Pearly and Genevieve Christensen 1050 Dale Street • cc: John P Rodeberg, Gary Plotz Objections to the high rate of assessments on the East side of . Pale Street belonging to t-Terlvn & Lucile Danielson. After the City is taking over an acre -+ for the new road :ent,r-r Avenue) there is only 4 -5 acras left and that is not enough ;en; the P117,000 that we are assess the road and storm sewer We are on a fixed income being over 70 years old. All ur woT-Ing days we managed to set aside a little savings to take us t ugh r„ r "golden years." Now those "gold"7ears" are being taken c by the City Council catering to big developers who have less frontage ut more acreage, and therefore are not assessed as much as we are. Also because of the big development Nest of Otter Lake, us small people alon, Dale Street have to bear the biggest impact of assessments. You said this assessment couli be deferred for 10 vears. Fine, except over 10 years these assessments at 10% would grow by another sizable amount, and on our fixed income, we would never be able to meet those assessments, originally, our property on the East side of Dale Street and the, West side was one - piece of property. Then the road was cut through. Now we are being penalized by having to pay twice for each side of the road. C , -A 013J CGT o �ssf,�T relc 10dO &Z 51 S w. ":kh"17san . .4w17 55350 9 9, o % -e uh&&r,5.yrred Aro,oP.�'�� spec, b od "c - 4-h e u (O po.5cc1 �sse 1 J e S �enfs ,di �s ' Un 's Av our p ro perr - 0 P i / � a W OAM I The following land owners that are against having a bicvcle trail on the West side of Pale Street from South /trade Road to Century Avenue. 2.,8 3 _ . S.Vr mac.✓ 6. 7. +�4 8, 4 10. Reasons why: 1. A hazzard to Ret onto Dale St, because of Navin¢ to back out of their driveways. 2. The trail will run awfully close to t homes o n the West side, therefore taking away any privacv we had. 3. Zee build -up from a different type of traffic. 4. Yes, there is a need for a trail but whether thev cross Pale St, on the South end or the North end, the car traffic will be the same. And in the future, if a stop and go light is installed on the corner of Pale and South Crade Road, then it would be safer to cross over at that intersection. 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11268 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029 LETTING NO. 4/PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99 -04 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of: Project No. 99-03 Century Avenue SW from Sunset Street SW to Dale Street SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, traiVsidewalk and appurtenances; Project No. 99 -04 Dale Street SW from Century Avenue SW Extension to South Grade Road SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, Is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 1999, until the 31st day of December, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 1999; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999. A Mayor City Administrator / I PUBLICATION NO. 6042 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5031 LETTING NO. 7/PROJECT NO. 99 -10 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 6:00 P.M. on the 27th day of July, 1999, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Trunk Highway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 1999. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31 st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 10 percent (plus or minus) per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until November 15, 1999. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 736,104.12 Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has tested, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 9 - 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. eI PUBLICATION NO. 6042 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 6031 LETTING NO. 71 PROJECT NO. 99-10 PAGE_ 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, the , ay be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Cu. al. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may mai 1 final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law ;o new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant t. oiesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Admimstrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferent of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed for for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. /Gary D. Plotz/ Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, JULY 13TH, 1999 ANDTUESDAY,- JULY 20TH, 1999. nU I L.1111VOy►y cnU11VJ= 11VU/rUbL1L VVUKt%O utrAK I MCnr Hdchhroon City Center 1 11t Hum Stred SE I Hutchlmon, M1mesob 55350.25221 Phone (612) 234 2091 FAX (612) 23142A0 ;. REVISED E N G I N E E R I N G=RtPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works DATE: July 20, 1999 SUBJECT: letting No. 7/1roject No. 99 -10 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they be constructed. Project No. 99 -10: Trunk Highway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. ESTIMATED COST 99 -10 Construction Cost $1,250.000.00 Engineering $195,000.00 Administration $75,000.00 Fiscal/Legal/Interest $37,500.00 E T ATED;TOTAL $1,557.500.00 ESTIMATED FUNDING 99=10 Assessable Cost' $786,104.12 Deferred Assessable°Cost. _ - $0.00 City Bonded _ _ _- $771,395.88 City - Water /Sewer kinds $0.00 City — TIF $0.00 MSA $0.00 Mn/DOT $0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL $1,557,500.00 0 — cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department CJ4 PUBLICATION NO. NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 99 -10 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the ancil Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at, 3 PM on the 10th day of August, 1999, to consider the making of an improvement of Trunk Iz ;ghway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer am, ervices, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefited property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $771,395.88, with an Assessable Cost of $786,104.12, for the total estimated cost of $1,557,500.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. . Dated: July 27, 1999 City Administrator PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JULY 29TH, 1999. 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11269 REVISED RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 99-10 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted January 12th, 1999, the Director of Engineering has prepared a report with reference to the improvement of Trunk Highway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and said report was received by the Council on July 27, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HiTCCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,557,500.00. 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 10th day of August, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor _City Administrator PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1999 AND TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999 1 Col. x 2" Box Ad (Do not put in Classified Section) PUBLIC HEARING July 27,1999 — 6:00 p.m. at City Center i Discussion of Cable Franchise Transfer from Triax to Mediacom Public Input Welcomed If there are any questions regarding the ad, contact: Marilyn J. Swanson City Center 234 -4202 0 5---C31 BERNICK AND LIFSON TFD iN WISCON91N 'ir 1LIC ACCOUNTLNT •1 ) IN FLORIDA COAL ASSISTANT M RYN O. MASTERMAN OF COVN6CL ICHACL R, BRADLEY 0 n n n —1999 July 2, 1999 Mr. Gary Plotz Administrator City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan St. S. E. Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Re: Triax/Mediacom Cable Franchise Transfer Dear Mr. Plow Under Minnesota law, a franchising authority has thirty (30) days to conduct a hearing after it notifies the transferee that a public hearing is necessary. On behalf of the franchising authority, our firm notified Triax that a hearing was necessary on June 17, 1999. While we believe federal law preempts state law requiring such a hearing, Triax has insisted on a public hearing, Triax will be required to pay all of your notice and hearing expenses. Therefore, the franchising authority must schedule a hearing on or before July 17, 1999. When you open the public hearing, continue it, do not close it, We will continue to review the FCC 394 and make a recommendation. Once the franchising authority acts on our recommendation, it may close the hearing. REMEMBER: OPEN then CONTINUE, DO NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, BERNICK AND LIFSON, P.A. /�412?5 > Michael R. Bradley CITY OF HUTCHINSON A A PROFE35IONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW NCAL J. SHAPIRO SUITE 1200. THE COLONNADE SAUL A. YCRNICN' 5500 WAYZATA BOULEVARD THOMAS D. CREIGHTON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 66416 -1270 SCOTT A. LIFSON DAVID N, NIOHTINOALEt TELEPNONC 16121 6.6 -1300 PAUL J. OUAST FACSIMILE (613) 5 <6 -1009 R062RT J. V. VOSE WILLIAM S. RORSECRO TFD iN WISCON91N 'ir 1LIC ACCOUNTLNT •1 ) IN FLORIDA COAL ASSISTANT M RYN O. MASTERMAN OF COVN6CL ICHACL R, BRADLEY 0 n n n —1999 July 2, 1999 Mr. Gary Plotz Administrator City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan St. S. E. Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Re: Triax/Mediacom Cable Franchise Transfer Dear Mr. Plow Under Minnesota law, a franchising authority has thirty (30) days to conduct a hearing after it notifies the transferee that a public hearing is necessary. On behalf of the franchising authority, our firm notified Triax that a hearing was necessary on June 17, 1999. While we believe federal law preempts state law requiring such a hearing, Triax has insisted on a public hearing, Triax will be required to pay all of your notice and hearing expenses. Therefore, the franchising authority must schedule a hearing on or before July 17, 1999. When you open the public hearing, continue it, do not close it, We will continue to review the FCC 394 and make a recommendation. Once the franchising authority acts on our recommendation, it may close the hearing. REMEMBER: OPEN then CONTINUE, DO NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Should you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, BERNICK AND LIFSON, P.A. /�412?5 > Michael R. Bradley CITY OF HUTCHINSON A 0 BOXED AD — 4" X 5" PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF HUTCHINSON BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING A.W. DISPOSAL SANITATION SERVICES 6:00 P.M. TUESDAY, JULY 27,1999 0 The City Council of the City of Hutchinson will meet to hold a Board of Review regarding solid waste services provided by A. W. Disposal sanitation services. The hearing will take place at the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. Public input from city residents is invited. PUBLICATION NO. 6046 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999 AND HUTCHINSON SHOPPER 4 14 • BOND SALE REPORT $4,350,000 General Obligation improvement Bonds, Series 1999 City of Hutchinson, Minnesota 11 July 27, 1999 0 Ehlers & Associates, Inc. to -� . -,, 7Y7 J. 1': rIVI II.�N' n'. fit,. • OVERVIEW This report describes the proposed plan for the City of Hutchinson to issue $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds. Series 1999. This report has been prepared by Ehlers Sc Associates, in consultation with City Staff and bond counsel. This report deals with: • Purpose and components of bond issue. • Structure. • Other considerations in issuing bonds. • Market conditions. • Issuing process. PURPOSE • The $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, for the purpose of financing the public improvement projects listed on Exhibit 1. Financing these projects requires a bond issue in the amount of $4,350,000. The proposed finance plan consists of the following sources and uses of funds: Sources Par Amount of Bonds $4,350,000 Interest Earned 36.836 Total Sources $4,386,836 Uses Total Project Costs $4,306,636 Discount Allowance 52,200 Capitalized Interest 0 Finance Related Expenses 28.00 Total Uses $4,386,836 0 Page 1 "U . [ ;. YYY ) . .rvi _ '.) � �aNU . STRUCTURE AND REPAYMENT ', U. DL"uq IB The Bonds are general obligations of the City of Hutchinson and as such are secured • by a pledge of the City's full faith, credit, and taxing powers. It is the intent of the City to use the special assessments levied against the benefitting property owners i the years 1999 through 2008, at the NIC rate received on the Bonds. The remainirg balance will be paid by from a tax levy. The repayment schedule has been structured to fit around the existing tax levies or debt service. Principal payments maturing in 2001 through 2011 are structurcu to wrap around outstanding debt and provide the ability to add future debt without increasing the debt service levy. The Bonds would be sold August 24, 1999 and be dated September 16, 1999. The first interest payment on the Bonds will be August 1, 2000, and semiannually thereafter on February 1 and August 1. Principal on the Bonds will be due on February 1 in the years 2001 through 2011. The projected debt service and flow of funds can be found in Exhibit 2. O THWR CONSIDERATIONS Following is a summary of key factors in the finance plan: • • We recommend the following call feature: Bonds maturing February 1, 2007 and thereafter will be subject to prepayment at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2006. We anticipate that the City (in combination with any subordinate taxing jurisdictions or debt issued in the City's name by 501(c)3 corporations) will not issue more than a total of $10,000,000 in tax- exempt debt during this calendar year. This will allow the Bonds to be designated as bank qualod. Bank qualified status broadens the market and achieves lower interest rates. Because the City is not issuing more than $5,000,000 in tax- exempt obligations during calendar year 1999, the debt will qualify for the small issuer exemption from arbitrage rebate. The Bonds will be global book cntry. As "paperless" bonds, you will avoid the costs of bond printing and the need for registrar/paving agent. Page 2 0 4 V.;zz4 • Moody's Investors Service will be asked to rate this issue. The City currently has • a 'Baa -1" rating on its outstanding general obligation bonds. • New regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the continuing disclosure of municipal securities apply to long -term securities with an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 or more. Because the aggregate amount of this issue is over $1,000,000 and the City has more than $10,000,000 in total municipal obligations outstanding, you will be obligated to comply with Full Continuing Disclosure requirements as required by paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You will be required to provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City annually and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain material events. The specific nature of the Undertaking, as well as the information to be contained in the notices of material events will be set forth in the Continuing Disclosure Covenants that you will enter into at the time of closing for this issue. You are responsible for reporting any of the material events listed below and in the Undertaking. 1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies; • 2. Non - payment related defaults; 3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; 4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; 5. Substitution of credit of liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; 6. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the securities; 7. Modification to rights of holders of the Securities; 8. Securities calls; 9. Defeasances; 10. Release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of the Securities; 11. Rating changes; 12. Failure to provide annual financial information as required; and 13. Other material events. • Page 3 .Ll. IYyr M LdL '�na & AJ�UC. N0. X2'4 REFUNDING OPPORTUNITIES We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that th are • no immediate refunding opportunities for the City at this time. We will cont a to monitor the market and the call dates for the City and alert you to any ure opportunities. MARRY CONDITIONS Current interest rates provide an excellent environment for issuing the Bonds. The Bond Buyer's 20 -Year G.O. Index (BBI) has remained relatively constant since late August, 1998. Rates in 1998 continued a multi -year downward trend. During the year, the BBI fell to 4.82%, the lowest point in almost 30 years- In recent weeks, the BBI has been on a slight upward trend. The BBI currently stands at 5.36%. The graph on the following page shows the trends for tax - exempt rates in the BBI since 1990. Page 4 0 Ehlers & Associates. Inc. • Bond Buyer's Index 20 -Year G.O. Bonds �J 8.00% 7.50% 7.00% 6.50% 6.00% 5.50% 5.00 °k 1 4.50% 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 wd • 07/22/99 .0 LI - yry D:I i - v ��.,: � r�aaUU. W.,io4 r. 20 ISSUING PROCESS Following is a tentative schedule for the steps in the issuing process_ July 27, 1999 City Council adopts resolution calling for sale of the Bonds Week of August 9, 1999 Submit draft Official Statement and ratis B materials to Moody's Investors Service for credit rating Week of August 9, 1999 Distribute Official Statement Week of August 16, 1999 Receive credit rating August 24, 1999 Bond We September 16, 1999 Bond closing (estimated) NAM OAWQWUWMOw,\BtSUM1l 999$4600MJCP(G0ImP)W,rnk Page 6 • ,� [( .:7 '_t52 S � w. ;Z34 L. Resolution No. • Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: Resolution Providing for the Sale of $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 r1 \_J A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 (the "Bonds "), to finance the construction of various improvements in the City; and B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc.. in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its independent financial advisor forthe Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9); NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED by the City Council of City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Authorization: Findin¢s The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of the Bonds. 2. Meetine: Proposal QpeninH The City Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms of Proposal for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for, and awarding the sale of the Bonds. The City Administrator, or designee, shall open proposals at the time and place specified in such Terms of Proposal. 3. Terms; of Propg4. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the sale thereof are fully set forth in the Bond Sale Report and are hereby approved and made a pan hereof. 4. Official Statement In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following Council Members voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this _ day of am City Administrator (SEAL) 1J I . rry L [rry .rl L.nJ d h)au6. City of Hutchinson, MN General ObrpabDn Improvement Bonds of 1999 Siang worksheet South Area Trunk San Sewer Industrial Park Switery Service Century AvenueNale Street Block 50 Alley TH 15 SouttdDenver & Edmonton Avenues HasaanJSeichow Street Overlay Projects Boulder r Stoney Point South Lakewood Estates 2nd Street lights Project Costs Less: SewerMlater Project Costs for Borrowing Finance Related Expenses Discount Allowance Less: Interest Earnings laaue size Prepared by Ehlers and Associates MT-TWOM 2,042,400 248.000 1,558,661 164,035 1,857,360 718.239 129.821 26,767 115,246 60,000 6,920.546 (2.613.910) 4.306,836 28,000 52,200 4.386,836 (38,636) K350.000 W . ; [ , or C t tsion Only EXHIBIT 1 786.104 62,933 746,104 337.891 129,821 26,767 115,245 2.204.866 $0.69'/0 New " $2,400 248,000 30.000 30.000 43,510 2,613,910 07126M • Prepared by Ehlws and Associates 07/27M • For Discu* Only . City of Hutchinson, NN (u General Oblgaflon Improvsrnent Bonds of 1999 $4,360,000 a Rau: 5.05% 105% Total Total S2,204AU NOW New Existing Total Fiscal pate I R�1 II Pte, J i ll Spec. Aaaess. 22!2! 29M Q" -D" year 09/16/99 1,617,800 1,617,600 1999 08mimo 187,884.38 187,864.38 187,884.38 331,832 0 0 1,541,900 1,541,900 2000 02101;17 200,000 4.35 107,382.50 307,362.50 08101/01 103,012.50 103,012.50 410,375.00 320,696 89,677 94,161 1,418,100 1,572,261 2001 02101!02 175,000 4.40 103,012.50 278,01250 08101102 99,16250 99,162.50 377,175.00 309,563 67,612 70.993 1,339,200 1,410,193 2002 02101;13 225,000 4.50 99,162.50 324,162.50 DBMM 94,100.00 94.100.00 418,262.50 298,428 119,834 125,826 1,233,200 1,359,026 2003 02/01/04 275,000 4.80 94,100.00 369,100.00 OWUN 87,775.00 87,775.00 458,675.00 287,294 169,581 178,060 1,128,100 1,308,160 2004 021oiM 325,000 4.70 87,775.00 412,775.00 OB/0UD5 80,137.50 80,137.50 492,91250 276,159 216,753 227,691 1.28,700 1,257,291 2005 02/01108 300,ODO 4.80 80,137.50 380,137.50 06101/06 72,937.6D 72,937.50 453,075.00 265,025 188,050 197,453 1,020,400 1,217,853 2006 02/01.7 350,000 4.90 72,937.50 422,937.50 08101/07 54,362.50 64,362.50 487,300.00 253,890 233,410 245,080 939,500 1,184,580 2007 02/01/06 550,000 5.00 64,362.50 614,36260 08/01/08 50,612.50 50,812.50 664,975.00 242,756 422,219 443,330 367,000 81D,330 2008 ui 02101M 725,000 5.10 50,612.50 775,612.50 08!01/09 32 ,125.00 32,125.00 507,737.50 231,621 576,116 604,922 166,300 770,222 2009 CE D21DII10 675,000 5.20 32,125.00 707,125.00 0110111D 14,575.00 14,575.00 721,700.00 143,846 577,752 606,840 154,400 761,040 2010 02/01111 550,000 5.30 14,575.00 564,575.00 0&01!11 0.DO 0.00 564,575.00 564,575 592,604 156,600 749,404 2011 04 7 k 350,000 _ 1,8 _ 6.0 W I 88 6 04 2.846.88 - Assessments in 2010 reflect the ranainog 2000 assessment collection after 2000 debt service has been paid. Dated: 09110199 Bond Years: 33,558.25 Interest start: Owim Average life: 7.71408 Discount 62,200.00 Av"aCoupon: 5.04480% Not Interest Cost: 5.20038% Prepared by Ehlws and Associates 07/27M UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA • twin Cities Campus Minnesota Center for Survey Research July 14, 1999 Suite 141 2331 University Avenue S.E. Minneapolis, MN55414 -3067 612- 6274282 RECEIVED JUL 16 1999 CITY OF HUTCHINSON Gary Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 Dear Mr. Plotz: Enclosed are two topies of the University of Minnesota Departmental Services Agreement, the University's external sales contract which I am required to use. If the terms of this agreement and the attached Schedule A, concerning the description of services and compensation, are acceptable to you, please sign on the designated page and return one copy to me. The second copy is for your files. Sincerely, 03 • -. Rossana Armson Director Al • DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AGREE EENT THIS DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (the 'Agreement ") is by and between the Regents of the University of Minnesota (the 'University") and the City of Hutchinson (the "Company "). WHEREAS the University desires to provide services to the Company as set forth herein; and WHEREAS the Company desires to retain the University for such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the University and Company agree as follows: Description of Services. (See Schedule A) 2. Term. July 14 through September 30, 1999. 3. Compensation. (See Schedule A) 4. Independent Contractor. The University's personnel are independent contractors for, and not employees of, the Company. The Company will not pay or withhold income taxes or other payroll taxes of any kind on behalf of the University or its personnel. Indemnification. The Company agrees to indemnify and hold the University harmless from all claims, losses, expenses, fees including attorney fees, costs, and judgments that may be asserted against the University that result from the acts, omissions, or providing inaccurate information of or by the Company, the Company's employees, and the Company's agents, including: 5.1 Rendering prompt, complete, accurate information to the University; or 5.2 Advising the University promptly of any changes affecting the University's ability to perform the services described. 6. Confidentiality. All data and information submitted or made available to the University by the Company or any other person, unless otherwise publicly available, and all data and information and other work developed by the University under this Agreement shall be utilized by the University in connection with this Agreement only. Except as required by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minn. Stat. 13.01, et seq.), such data shall not be made available by the University to any • other person without the prior written consent of the Company. �_(A 7 Publications. The Company recognizes that under University policy the results of Services must be publishable and agrees that researchers engaged in Services shall be permitted to present at symposia, or national or regional professional meetings and to publish in journals, theses, or dissertations, or otherwise of their own choosing, methods and results of Service, provided, however, that Company shall have been furnished copies of any proposed publication or presentation at least two (2) months in advance of the submission of such proposed publication or presentation to a joun ,s, editor, or other third party. Company shall have one (1) month, after receipt of ;,dd copies, to object to such proposed presentation or proposed publication either b.:-�use there is patentable subject matter which needs protection and/or there is Confidrr!ial Information of Company contained in the proposed publication or presentation. It a the event that Company makes such objection, the parties shall negotiate an acceptable version, and the said researcher(s) shall refrain from making such publication or presentation for a maximum of six (6) months from date of receipt of such objection in order for Consultant to file patent application(s) with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and/or foreign patent office(s) directed to the patentable subject matter contained in the proposed publication or presentation. 8. Intellectual Property. The following provisions shall apply with respect to copyrightable works, ideas, discoveries, inventions, applications for patents, and patents, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, and other intellectual property (collectively, •Intellectual Property'): B.I. Title to all Intellectual Property made by an employee or agent of University resulting from the work performed hereunder shall reside in University; 8.2. Title to all Intellectual Property made by Company resulting from the work performed hereunder shall reside in Company; 8.3. Title to all Intellectual Property made jointly by University and Company resulting from the research performed hereunder shall reside jointly in University and Company. Inventorship and authorship shall be determined in accordance with U.S. law. 9. Use of Names. The Company shall not state or imply in any publication, advertisement, or other medium that the test results, or any product or service bearing any of the Company's names or trademarks and manufactured, sold, or distributed by the Company, has been approved or endorsed by the University. The Company will not use the name of the University, nor any of its employees or agents, in any publicity, advertising, or news release without the prior written approval of the University. 10. Termination. The Company may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the University and upon payment of amounts owing the University through such termination date. The University may retain amounts, if any, paid by the Company under this Agreement prior to termination. The obligations imposed by Sections S and 6 of this Agreement as well as any licenses granted hereunder shall survive termination under this Agreement. • • • 11. General Provisions. 11.1. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by any party without the prior written consent of the other. 11.2. Force ANeure. Neither party to this Agreement shall be responsible for any delays or failure to perform any provision of this Agreement due to acts of God, strikes or other disturbances, war, insurrection, embargoes, governmental restrictions, acts of governments or governmental authorities, or other causes beyond the control of such party. 11.3. Limitation of Liabilities. The University shall not be liable to the Company for any incidental or consequential damages, regardless of the legal theory asserted, including negligence and strict liability. 11.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of Mmnesota. 11.5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the parties and may not be modified except by written agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior written and/or oral agreements. 11.6. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared void or • unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement, which shall otherwise remain in full force and effect. 11.7. Notices. Each notice, request, or demand given or required to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given if deposited in the United States mail, first class, postage pre-paid, and addressed to the address of the intended recipient set forth below or to such other address as may be specified in writing by the parties. 11.8. Authority. The parties warrant that they have the authority to enter into this Agreement and that entering into this Agreement is not restricted or prohibited by any existing agreement to which they are parties. la�ef�.rr.Z�7�ra 71:i►ii�:��rr � „u.i.i r Recommended for Approval: I / \ C Q ✓ �^ ¢ r� Responsible Faculty Member 1 u� Office of the General Counsel 2 Approved: By: Dated: Sul': i B Name printed/typed Title Dated: 1 Signature is required for all Agreements. Department is to forward copy of Agreement less than $50,000 to the Office of External Sales. 2 This format has been approved by the University's Office of the General Counsel. Office of the General Counsel approval is required if them am any additions or changes to the standard provisions. Unmodified standard agreements do not require signature by the Office of General Counsel. 0 0 c 1998 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. • Policy and Process Development Office. All Rights Reserved. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity ediaxtor and employer. Form Updated: Marsh 30, 1999 A- I/HUTCHINSON.DSA • DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The Minnesota Center for Survey Research (MCSR) will conduct a Community Needs - Survey for the City of Hutchinson. Tasks to be performed include sample selection, data collection, coding and editing, data processing and analysis, and presenting the survey results to the Hutchinson City Council. The total cost for these services will not exceed $13,500. You agree to pay half of this amount to the Minnesota Center for Survey Research when the project is initiated and to pay -- the balance due when the project is completed. A detailed cost estimate is attached for your information. If this project is completed for less than the estimated costs, you will only be billed for the costs incurred. This cost estimate assumes that the survey will be printed in 12 page small booklet form, that the City will provide an electronic listing from which a random sample of 800 households will be selected, that the first mailing and reminder postcard will be sent to the entire sample, that the third mailing will be sent to 60% of the initial sample, that the City will provide the printed materials and first class postage (est $1,126), that up to 520 surveys will be completed and returned, that coding/editing will average 12 minutes for each completed survey, and that supplies and other expenses will be reimbursed for the actual costs incurred. If, during the project, these assumptions prove to be substantially in error, it may be necessary to revise the cost estimate or to revise the delivered product. The first mailing is scheduled for July 19 and all work will be completed by September 30. At the completion of the project you will receive the completed survey forms, a brief report on the numeric results and technical details, and an SPSS Windows data file. In addition, a presentation of the survey results to the Hutchinson City Council is scheduled for September 14, 1999. 41 -"l 1 . COMPENSATION -- - - -- 1999 BILLING RATES HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY 12 PAGE MAIL SURVEY SENT TO 800 HOUSEHOLDS DIRECT COSTS (based on approved 1999 Billing Rates) PERSONNEL (Object 7301) TOTAL PERSONNEL 12,213 SUPPLIES AND OTHER EXPENSES Object Hourly rate Not. Hours Total Cost Executive management 62.00 60 3,720 Project management 43.50 77 3,350 Data processing 34.50 70 2,415 Student workers 14.75 185 2,729 TOTAL PERSONNEL 12,213 SUPPLIES AND OTHER EXPENSES Object 7310 Printing /duplicating (1 9 env & postcards) 127 Object 7301 Sample 0 Object 7340 Courier 12 Object 7341 Postage (800 postcards and $20 misc) 188 Object 7301 Data entry (subcontracted) 850 Object 7351 Long distance telephone 45 Object 7300 Local travel 65 TOTAL SUPPLIES /OTHER EXPENSES 1,287 TOTAL COSTS $13,500 A ASSUMPTIONS: 12 page -mall booklet survey form for mailing First mailing and postcard reminder sent to entire sample Third mailing sent to 60% of initial sample Printed survey forms and cover letters, 0 10 envelopes, first class postage for lot and 3rd mailings (eat $1,126) provided by client Up to 520 completed s urveys 12 minutes coding /editing for each completed survey supplies and other expenses will be reimbursed for actual costs incurred A- 1 /HUTCHINSON 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir. RE: Central Garage, growth and changes DATE: 07/22/1999 CC: JOHNRODEBERG, DIR OF ENGR/PUB WKS, KIN WICIMAMAKI,=ANIC. CHANGES AND GROWTH IN THE CENTRAL GARAGE Several factors are leading to tremendous changes and growth in the Central Garage operation. One is the addition of state and county mechanics to the HATS facility. McLeod County has had a mechanic at HATS since February 1999. County mechanics vacated their shop in Glencoe because of air quality issues. Mn/DOT District 8 has been expanding their regional staff, and will be adding on to HATS. Mn/DOT expects to add a welder /equipment maintenance position at HATS beginning August 1, 1999 or shortly thereafter. Hutchinson Utilities and the Central Garage have explored combining their light vehicles for purposes of contracting oil/frlter/lube services. The City has 37 light vehicles, and Hutchinson Utilities has 20 light vehicles. By contracting for these services together, we expect the best possible price from local vendors. The City Attorney has reviewed the draft agreement for these services. I am anticipating advertising for quotations this week. We expect there will be about 140 service visits per year from the combined fleet. We are expecting to contract with two vendors for oil/filter /lube/inspection services. ADDITION OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES FLEET TO CENTRAL GARAGE OPERATION During discussions about the common service contract, maintenance for the rest of Hutchinson Utilities' fleet became an issue. Hutchinson Utilities does not employ anyone in a mechanic position, dedicated to the truck and contractor equipment fleet. Because of the size of their fleet, this would not be financially feasible. Their fleet is, however, of the size and complexity that requires significant maintenance each year. J C Using current Public Works staffing, adding Hutchinson Utilities fleet to the City's Central • Garage operations would not be feasible. This is especially true because the Fire Departmet. vehicles were added in April 1999. Adding the Hutchinson Utilities fleet would require approximately a %, FTE mechanic position. Sharing a % FTE position between Central Garage and Public Works department would be feasible, considering changes in the City that have recently taken place. There are, however, some changes in the City's operation that would make adding Hutchin Utilities fleet to the Central Garage operation not only possible, but beneficial. For winter 1999/2000, there will be several added snow removal routes: 1. Fifth Ave SE (from the new bridge to TH 22) 2. Dale St SW (from Co Rd 7 to South Grade Road) 3. Century Ave SW (west of the fairgrounds) 4. Denver Ave SW (west of TH15) 5. Edmonton Ave SW (west of TH15) 6. Added road, apron, parking lot, and extension of the taxiway at the airport. 7. Street(s) east of California Street NE 8. Extensions of other local streets Initially I anticipated contracting for snow removal at the airport, which would free up enough time to cover the new, added routes. I was unable to find a contractor willing to do snow removal at the airport. Contractors are busy serving their current snow removal customers. In another development, the seasonal employee who has been providing snow removal services at the airport will not be available. He has indicated that he will be gone more during the winter months, and will be unavailable to plow snow. By eliminating part-time positions, and adding a %: mechanic, 'h operator, we will be able to serve Hutchinson Utilities fleet and cover every snow removal route, including the new routes, with full -time employees. We are anticipating beginning the search process for a mechanic/operator position as soon as practicable. It is expected that the candidate will have mechanic training or experience, which would add to the department's flexibility. We currently have employees who could augment the Central Garage operation, but another employee with those skills would be helpful. EXPANSION OF HATS FACILITY TO HOUSE MECHANICS At its last meeting, the HATS Joint Powers Board discussed the future of mechanics at HATS. The HATS facility was designed for one mechanic, the City's Central Garage mechanic. With all of the expansion, there could be as many as 4.5 FTE mechanics working out of the HATS facility. ` - Temporary changes are being made to accommodate the new mechanics. The HATS Joint Powers Board agreed that a study be done to look at the impact adding this many mechanic positions will have on the building, and whether remodeling or a building addition should be planned for the near future. 0 • HATS is a desirable location for mechanic services. It is located the same place as fuel and is an inter- agency building, which lends itself well to the additional mechanics. Each mechanic brings particular skills and resources to the job, and by putting the all three mechanic positions in the same location, the transfer of skills is inevitable. McLeod County is currently studying their options for a mechanics shop in Glencoe. The County Engineer is willing to add the HATS facility to that study, while looking at the possibility of a permanent presence in Hutchinson. The greatest issue, however, remains that the building was designed for one mechanic, and there could be as many as 4.5 mechanics working on over 300 vehicles out of the HATS facility. The HATS Joint Powers Board will be reviewing the findings of the consultant at an upcoming meeting. The HATS Joint Powers Board expects to formulate a plan for future mechanic bays soon after _- reviewing the consultant's study. 0 • TITLE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC/OPERATOR jobdesc 1999 DEPARTMENT CENTRAL GARAGE /STREETS & MAINTENANCE • SUPERVISED BY CENTRAL GARAGE MECHANIC; ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUMMARY THIS IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE IN THE CENTRAL DRAFT GARAGE AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORK IN THE STREET 7123199 DEPARTMENT DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. CENTRAL GARAGE 1 Performs general maintenance on all equipment operated by the City of Hutchinson and Hutchinson Utilities Commission. a Identifies problems, repairs, and performs preventive maintenance on vehicles and equipment. Advises on repairing, modifying, or maintenance of vehicles and equipment. b Makes mechanical repairs on city vehicles and equipment by maintaining, repairing, adjusting, and/or replacing: air conditioning and heating system components, electrical system components, fuel system components, hydraulic system components, transmissi system components, mechanical system components, diesel, gas, and small engines and other power producing components, body panels, windshields, mirrors, and other body appurtenances, mechanical equi pment (e.g., bearings, shaft sleeves, gears, impellers). c Makes appropriate equipment modifications; rebuilds or builds equipment from scratch. Reads blue prints and fabricates items as necessary. d Orders and installs repair parts. 2 Updates maintenance schedules, prepares inspection forms and various reports, as necessary. Maintains and uses library of equipment information and manuals. 3 Operates, inspects and maintains the fuel, oil and lubricants delivery system, shop equipment and tools including, cutting torches, welders, soldering irons, and other related equipment 4 Performs metal work and welds metals. • STREET MAINTENANCE 1 Responsible for snow removal and mowing at the City Municipal Airport Operates appropriate equipment 2 Operates any or all equipment used in maintenance on municipal infrastructure. Equipment includes: Tractor, motor grader, trucks, wheel loader, sweeper, snowplow truck, backhoe, skidsteer loader, and other light vehicles and power tools. 3 Performs routine servicing and care of equipment or supplies. GENERAL 1 Assists other department as directed. Assists others by teaching them proper and safe use of vehicles and equipment 2 Performs related duties as assigned or apparent 3 Follows all safety rules, department policies, and other related regulations. IP ul W All equipment and supplies of the street department and all machinery and equipment used by the City of Hutchinson and the Hutchinson Utilities Commission. Commmications equipment. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS Training and substantial experience in the mechanical maintenance of a variety of construction equipment and heavy trucks. Training and experience operating trucks and construction equipment Ability to communicate well verbally, and in writing. Physical strength and stamina. Willingness to accept a variety of duties. Ability to work well with fellow employees, customer departments, and the public. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Commercial drivers license (CDL) class B w/ tanker and hazardous waste endorsements. j • WORKING CONDITIONS Inside and outside work in all weather. Scheduled and unscheduled hours related to maintenance as required by supervisors or as dictated by weather conditions. Scheduled for on-call hours during winter months. STARTING RATE: S 12.48 / hour �— c , 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator CC: Date: July 23, 1999 Re: REFUSE CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH A.W. DISPOSAL I have met with Tom Worlunan of A. W. Disposal, and their firm is willing to extend the refuse contract through October 1, 2000 with the same contract conditions/price. Tlu4 ension will give us additional time to implement the composting project and c4ushUotion that has a "tentative start -up date" of October 1, 2000. • The lard of Review at the Council meeting tonight is pursuant to the contract to heat`,a1Xy complaints on the service, if any. Tom Workman will be in attendance at fhe Gotincil meeting. 1 To: Mayor and City Council From: Mary Haugen — P.R.C.E. Operations Manager Date: July 21, 1999 Re: Mighty Ducks Grant Agreement The construction of the addition to the Civic Arena is proceeding on schedule. The cooperation and communication among the Hockey Association Building Committee, the general contractor and city staff has been very good, which has enhanced the decision-making process and has kept the project on track. We received word from the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission that we are to "ve-an additional $66,500 "Mighty Ducks" grant. This is in addition to the $125,000 award. Together, these two grants total $191,500 - still $58,500 'h f# bie possible total of $250,000 that our grant proposal made us eligible for. **I[ receive funding in 1999 for this amount, but it is more likely that we u 0AM &ce to conti ive it in year 2000, if the state legislature votes n e the "Mighty ...................... ..................... P gram. ity Council action is required for us to receive the additional $66,500 grant. The id4ched resolution authorizes execution of the grant agreement and certifies incumbancy. We ask that you pass this resolution so that we can execute the grant agreement with the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. J 11 " ,e7. RESOLUTION #11261 0 CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT and CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBANCY Be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson enter an agreement with the State of Minnesota, for the Hutchinson Civic Arena Expansion Project, to be conducted during the period from November 1, 1998 through November 1, 1999. Marlin Torgerson is hereby authorized to sign and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Grantee. I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson on July 27, 1999. I further certify that Marlin Torgerson is the present Mayor of the -City of Hutchinson and that the following is a specimen-of his or_her • signature. SIGNED: WITNESSED: (Signature Representing Executive Body) (Title) - (Date) (Signature) (Title) (Date) 11 �-F' - • THIS grant contract, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Amateur Sports Commission (hereinafter STATE) and the City of Hutchinson (hereinafter GRANTEE), witnesseth that: WHEREAS, the STATE, p ursuan t to Minnesota Statutes Section 240A.09 and 1997 Minn. Laws ch. 202, art. 1, sec. 26 is empowered to promote the development of proposals and award grants for new statewide public ice facilities and for renovation of existing ice arenas; and WHEREAS, on or about March 10, 1997, the STATE issued a Request for Proposals ( "RFP') seeking proposals from eligible GRANTEES interested in building or renovating public ice arenas; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE's proposal was among those selected to receive grant funds to finance the construction or renovation of an ice arena; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set 0 forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: I. GRANTEE'S DUTIES GRANTEE shall construct a new public ice arena or renovate an existing public ice arena in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications set forth in the STATE's RFP and GRANTEE's proposal, which shall be read together, attached hereto and incorporated by referenced as Exhibit A. ;_4M• a & we) ; r Xj Uhl A. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursements to GRANTEE's shall be and shall not exceed sixty six thousand five hundred dollars ($66,500). B. Terms of Payment Payment shall be made by the STATE promptly after GRANTEE's presentation of evidence documenting that at least twenty-five percent (25 %) of the construction or renovation of the public ice arena has been completed and paid for with funds other . than this grant award. Such evidence shall be submitted in a manner prescribed by the STATE, and shall constitute compliance with the match requirement set forth under Minn. Stat. 240A.09(b). III. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT All services provided by GRANTEE pursuant to this grant contract shall be performed to the satisfaction of the STATE, as determined at the sole discretion of its authorized representative, and in accord with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. GRANTEE shall not receive payment for work found by the STATE to be unsatisfactory, or performed in violation of federal, state or local laws, ordinances, �;' E rules or regulations. IV. TERMS OF CONTRACT This grant contract shall be effective on Ju- :8, 1999 or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, p ursuan t to .inn. Star 16B.06, subd. 2, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2000. : until all obligations set forth in this grant contract have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever :urs first V. CANCELLATION Prior to disbursements of funds, this grant cori: Xt may be canceled by the STATE or GRANTEE at any time, with or without cause, upon th. -. ( 30) days written notice to the other party. If the STATE finds that there has been a failure to ct..iply withthe provisions of this agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made, or that t purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled, the STATE m: take action to protect its interests, including requiring the return of all or part of the funds already: disbursed. VI. STATE'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The STATE's authorized representative for the purpose of administration of this grant contract is Paul Erickson or his successor in office. The GRANTEE's authorized representative for purposes of administration of this grant contract is . The GRANTEE's authorized representative shall have full authority to represent GRANTEE in its fulfillment of the terms, conditions and requirements of this grant contract. VII. ASSIGNMENT GRANTEE shall neither assign no transfer any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior written consent of the STATE. VIII. AMENDMENTS Any amendments to this grant contract shall be in writing, and shall be executed by the same parties who executed the original grant contract, or their successors in office. IX. LIABILITY GRANTEE agrees to indemnify and save and hold the STATE, its representatives and employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action, including. all attorney's fees incurred by the STATE, arising from the performance of this grant contract by GRANTEE or GRANTEE's agents or employees. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal - remedies GRANTEE may have for the STATE's failure to fulfill its obligations p ursua nt to this gran[ contract. X. STATE AUDITS The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and - practices of the GRANTEE relevant to this grant contract shall be subject to examination by the STATE and the Legislative Auditor. M. DATA PRACTICES ACT The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act as it applies to all data provided by the STATE in accordance with this grant contract and as it applies to all data created, gathered, generated or acquired in accordance with this grant contract. XII. PUBLICITY Any publicity given to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract, including, but not limited to, notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the GRANTEE or its employees individually or jointly with others, or any subgrantees shall identify the STATE as a sponsoring agency and shall not be released without prior approval by the STATE's authorized representative. XM. ANTITRUST GRANTEE hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for overcharges as to goods and/or services provided in connection with this contract resulting from antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota XIV. PREVAILING WAGE GRANTEE hereby acknowledges that acceptance of this grant expressly subjects its construction or renovation or prevailing wage rate statutes (Minn. Stat. 177.41, et seq.). XV. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This grant contract, and amendments and supplements hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this grant contract, or breach thereof, shall be in the state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota XVI. GRANTEE SIGNATURES GRANTEE certifies that authorized person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the GRANTEE as required by applicable articles, by -laws or resolutions. XVII. OTHER PROVISIONS (Attach additional pages as necessary.) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this grant contract to be duly executed. APPROVED: 1. GRANTEE: 2. STATE AGENCY: 0 Title Date LM Date As to form and execution 3. ATTORNEY GENERAL Title M L1 • 10 ONOHUE July 23, 1999 Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator Hutchinson City Center I I I Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Re: I,euer of Recommendation Biosolids Drying Facilities Equipment Procurement and Installation Donohue Pmject No. 101 17 Dear Mr. Plotz: .1 :,1 I C)I.:II IG'q UR IWIM ,, FLU! h'f,AN, ,Y ],1181 1111N:; 1 121I J0Ab1+M, IAx 1 04 1118- II411/ Pursuant to the Official Notice to Bidders, sealed bids for the above referenced project were received in the City Council Chamber on July 10, 1999 at 1:00 pm. and publicly opened and reed aloud. We have reviewed the Bid received for the Equipment. �— One sealed bid was received. The bid was submitted by McCormick Construction Company of Rockford, Minnesota in the amount of 51,302,700. The budgetary allocation for the equipment was SI.214,200. The bid was 7.3% above this allocation. It is our opinion that the Bidder, McCormick Construction Company, submitted a responsive bid and is qualified and capable of performing the Work as specified. It is therefore recommended that the Conttaa be awarded to McCormick Construction Company, in the amount of SI,302,700_ We respectfully present these recommendations for City review and consideration Award of contract should be made by Resolution followed by official notification to the successful bidder. It is good practice to send the Notice of Award by certified mail or other delivery service that can verify that the document has been delivered. We will be pleased to answer any questions concerning the recommendations set forth herein. Sincerely, t �•�-J S. ltn„� Edward S. Nevers Professional Engineer r CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ._______,__.� To: City Council From: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning /Zoning /Building Date: July 22, 1999 — Meeting Date July 27, 1999 Re: Bill Mathew's Accessory Building at 5461550 Miller Avenue There have been numerous complaints received about the above - identified building. A petition was submitted by some of the residents in the neighborhood. The Planning Commission discussed this issue at their July 21, 1999 meeting and requested staff report the concerns of the neighbors. The petition outlines 5 areas of concern: height of the building and overhead doors; "pole barn" type appearance; height, building size and framing is not customary for residential areas; safety concerns based on potential use of the property; and adverse affect on property values. Staff has provided additional information regarding the concerns. • Height and Doors The height of the building was measured and was found to be exceeding the maximum height restriction of 16 feet. Definition of Height of Building: The vertical distance measured from the sidewalk level, or its equivalent ground surface .... to the mean height level (between eaves and ridge) for gable or hip roofs. A "stop -work" order was issued to determine the solution to the height problem. The applicant agreed to cut down the height of the building to not exceed 16 feet. The "stop- work" order was lifted after the Planning Commission meeting, under advisement from the City Attorney. The City has no regulations concerning garage door height. Below is a diagram of the building height: Accessory Building Issue 546/550 Miller Avenue — Bill Mathews Page 2 Appearance Of A "Pole Barn" Type Building The City Code defines a Pole Barn as: a building with a frame made of r. ood or metal parts, with metal panels covering three or more sides and without' a full foundation. This building contains a full foundation; therefore is not d+ ? :ned as a pole bam, regardless of its exterior materials. The property owner stated he will be using metal siding and metal roofing materials. The property owne also explained that there would be a different color border around the bor n of the building. Horizontal siding would require some reconstruction and athing to be added to the building. Building not Customary in Residential Areas - The property owner applied for a conditional use permit for t vi reasons: the property does not contain a principal structure and the building exceeded 1,000 square feet. The building is 32 feet by 40 feet (1,260 square feet). The Conditional Use Permit was reviewed with a public hearing at the Planning Commission on May 18, 1999. No public comment was received at the hearing or in writing. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The City Council reviewed the information and approved the conditional use on May 25, 1999. The Conditional Use Permit criteria were considered in the decision- making. A building permit was approved June 18, 1999. Safety Concerns with Potential Use of the Building The petition states that there would be construction equipment housed on the property. The property owner stated, at the Planning Commission meeting, the he may occasionally use a trailer, which would be stored in the building. The property owner stated the building is to be used for personal items. If problems occur when the building is in use, enforcement procedures can be used to halt violations. Property Value Concern Section 6.0 (B, 2, a), specifically considers adverse effects on adjacent property, prior to issuance of a conditional use permit. This was considered during review of the permit. Cc: Bill Mathews, property owner 0 \� � Y^ -_-- ''-'-------'-_��---_�___---------- � ` � w t lle.r Ave. N T • Q� 0 g- c- Nermiumim,1601t.t. W 10 • The homeowners surrounding the property of William Mathews, 550 Miller Ave. SW, originally received notification of a request for a building permit to build a garage on the indicated property. Upon notification, Bruce Briggs, 540 Miller Ave. SW, inquired with city hall about the specifications of the proposed garage. He expressed concern, that due to the size, the garage may not be intended for residential purposes but rather for commercial purposes since Mr. Mathews owns a construction business. Julie at city hall informed him that the building permit request was for a residential garagi. She also assured him that *s was a conditional use permit and the structure could not be nsed to house construction 4quipment. Mr. Briggs inquired about the construction material and was told that this information had not been requested or disclosed but it was believed that customary'residential construction materials would be used. Based on this information, the homeowners surrounding the property had no objection to the issuance of the permit to construct a customary residential garage. Based on completion of preliminary construction, the homeowners surrounding the site would like to express renewed concerns as follows: The height of the building and overhead doors are not consistent with a residential garage. . The framing of the structure suggests that use of vertical siding consistent with that used in the construction of an industrial "pole barn" will be used on the surface. The height, building size and framing is not customary construction for a residential neighborhood:. Since the structure suggests industrial use, there are safety concerns to the residents Df the surrounding properties, especially to children who reside in the area. If construction equipment is housed on the property, this will heighten safety concerns since entrance would occur through an alley access which runs parallel to residential play areas. Since the structure is not customary for a residential neighborhood, the existence of the structure as it is curre4tly constructed would have an adverse affect on neighboring property values. The homeowners surrounding 550 Miller Ave. SW have no objection to the construction of a standard residential garage which conforms with the othef structures in the neighborhood n�/ Signature 1- 9)4- d� e M�lG Signatur Address $yo Poe v 1 Address 2 0- -61� F I M MMYroll iTXv =#o ,1 1 col I 1 I' � . • .. - � �r 77a►i Si g n atur e / AM y A ddress VIM , � Jj, Address i Si gnature� Signature Address , Signature A . Si gnatu r e ��.� ♦ �I A d ♦ • - Si gnat ure /.. . Address Signature Address Signature Signature / Signature k Address S 3S -e+,) v 2� Signature / 0" /� / (/ r m i 4 Z Address -z 7 / Z 1, ., r7 fe r4 Signature Ir! Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signature Address Signatur# Address Signature Address Signature Address ! Signatur e _ Q , � .� Signature 7�ddress 3 '�? L,' a., 4ize . Address_ W Lill a�1 4.dlt. - i/ 0 9 0 COMPILED BY: C. RICE ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 LETTING NO. 14/PROJECT NO. 99-35 CENTURY 7 CINEMA STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN k APPURTENANCES 07/27/99 ADOPTED COMPUTED BY: C. RICE 1999 BOND FUND CHECKED BY: J. RODEBERG INTEREST RATE 1ST HRG WAIVED 10 NUMBER OF YEARS 2ND HRG WAIVED $19,659.10 COST PER UNIT ACCOUNT NO. CITY PID NO. NAME k ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT ASSESSMENT CREDIT DEFERRED ASSESSMENT TOTAL. ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 01 12- 116 -30- 07-0010 Cinema I LLP 5425 84th Ave N Wen 1/2 of Lot I, Block 1, 23.319.0010 Brooklyn Puk MN 55443 Fair Grounds Addition 1.00 $19,659.10 $0.00 $0.00 $19,659.10 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 $19,659.10 1 l ARA PAGE 10 1 RESOLUTION NO. 11270 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 LETTING NO. 14 /PROJECT NO. 99 -35 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of West ! f2 of Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer sear r:es and watermain services and appurtenances and appurtenances, and the bid price for s�;ch improvement is $15,589.49 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making rf such improvement amount to $4,069.64 so that total cost of the improvement will be $19.659.10. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $19,659.10. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator r1 RESOLUTION NO. 11271 RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 LETTING NO. 14 /PROJECT NO. 99 -35 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 27th day of July, 1999, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving West 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer services and watermain services and appurtenances and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The owner /owners of the affected properties have waived hearing on said proposed assessment. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 1999. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator • 0 Y, RESOLUTION NO. 11272 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 LETTING NO. 14/PROJECT NO. 99-35 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met ano awed the proposed assessment for improvement of West 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds A:'.' .on by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer services and waterrnain services and appu` - anoes and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TF 4TY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made; ' L)art hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands r,r_,-ned therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of pe rcent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest o n the entire assessment from November 1, 1999, until the 31 st day of December, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 1999; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditqr to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator 0 10 0 To: Mayor & City Council From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator [ -9 Data: July 23, 1999 Re: MCLEOD COUNTY STEERING COMMITTEE FOR CENSUS 2000 Bonnie Baumetz has been coordinating the census updates for the City of Hutchinson. meeting took place with Tammy Kassler, a census "partnership specialist," to dig forming a multi - jurisdictional steering committee called a "Complete count Co ee." urreYttl} the ad -hoc committee consists of Nan Crary and Tersa (County), Mark Laitft (Glencoe), Bonnie Baumetz and Gary Plotz (Hutchinson). It is recommended the City of Hutchinson adopt the attached proclamation that Glencoe and the County also intend to adopt We will immediately start activities that will focus on the census, and perhaps one of the first will be to have a booth at the County Fair. It is estimated that for every person counted in a local community, it has a value of $2,500 /person over a 10 -year period. This would be in the form of local, state and federal aids/grants. /mjs Attachment 1 Census 2000 Proclamation City of Hutchinson (city, Town, County, State, etc.) (Name of Government Entity) WHEREAS, the 2000 Census will determine apportionment of seats in the United States House of Representatives, state legislatures and local governments, and Is the basis for the allocation of billions of dollars of Federal funding: and, WHEREAS. Census information is confidential and protected by law, prohibiting any pubric or private agency from gaining access to confidential Census data; and, WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is committed to a full and accurate Census count and is placing special emphasis on enumerating members of traditionally undercounted population groups: and, WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has agreed to be one of the 39,000 governmental entities in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau; and. WHEREAS, the City o f Hutchinson shall form a Complete Count Committee consisting of members from the local government, business, religious, civic, and media communities; and. THEREFORE,I Marlin - Torgerson Mayor of the City of Hutchins— _ hereby proclaim Census 2000 as a top priority for all elected and appointed officials, and encourage the community to place an emphasis on partnering with the U.S. Census Bureau in achieving and accurate and complete count in Census 2000. Signed this 27th day of July . 199 Marlin Torgerson, Mayor ATTEST: SEAL Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator — T Hutchinson City Center • 111 Hassan street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 320 - 587- 5151/F" 320 - 2344240 O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Revised "Trunk Access Charge Rates" DATE: July 22, 1999 We have had issues arise regarding the fairness of charging full Sanitary Sewer and Watetmain Trunk charges for Nursing Home /Assisted living facilities. We agree that our current policy does not take into account these types of projects and would potentially be charging these properties the same rate as apartments that can utilize significantly more capacity of the system. We reviewed the rates and information received from Welcome To Our Home and other sources and propose to create a new, lower rate for Nursing Home /Assisted Living units. Our basis for this • revision: • Nursing Home/Assisted Living units generally have only 1 person per unit vs. about 2 people in an average apartment • People in Nursing Home /Assisted Living units generally use less water per person than apartments. An average person uses 80 to 100 gallons per day, while information indicates that people in Nursing Home /Assisted Living units use 20 to 40 gallons per day • Many Nursing Home /Assisted Living units do not have full bathrooms with showers/tubs or kitchens We have therefore proposed a revised and reduced rate that reflects the average usage of the system in comparison to regular apartment and house usage. We have also revised the wording of the policy to clarify how the rates are calculated and collected. We recommend approval of the revised Policy regarding Trunk Access Rate Charges. cc: Gary Plotz— City Administrator Julie Wischnack — Director of Planning Mark Hensen— Building Official file: Assessments 0 Printed on recycled paper - q- A. M E M 1999 TRUNK ACCESS CHARGE `TES CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNES SANITARY LOT TYPE SEWER W: ERMAIN RESIDENTIAL (Low to Mid- Density/R -1 R - 2, R - 3) 0 to' /z acre $ 550 /unit u- 25 /unit '/z to 3/4 acre $ 600 /unit 375 /unit 3/4 to 1 acre $ 680 /unit 440 /unit Over 1 acre $1,100 /acre 600 /acre HIGH = DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (114, R -5) All parcels ((except as applies below) $ 475/un' � 275 /unit Nursing Home /Assisted Living' $ 225/ur. $ 130 /unit COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL Negotiated' $ 1,700 /acre $ 1,200 /acre 1 Must meet standards in policy and receive approval of Planning Staff Z Varies due to diversity in utility use. Rate shall be no lower than those noted under "Residential -Over 1 acre". Trunk Storm Sewer Rates will be determined per project. A base rate of $0.05 /SF, or $2,200 /acre will be assumed for all low -to -mid density residential development, although the actual rate will be based on the actual costs needed to provide service to the property. High density residential, commercial and industrial rates may be higher. Credit will be given to properties providing trunk storm water improvements as part of privately funded improvements for oversized storm sewer, and quality or quantity ponding. Rates apply to all properties, unless previously assessed for trunk services. All funds collected will be utilized to pay off trunk sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer costs incurred by the City. The City shall collect the fee(s) with the building permit, unless otherwise approved. NOTE: 1999 Sanitary Sewer Rates baud on incrmu of appiournmely 5% from 1999 based on ENR Co "ion cost ratio and Consultant Review. Water mm increased 10°/ due to information derircd from Water Rata Cost of Service Study preparation. Appro.ed By Ciry C.0 don July 7 - , /999' HA4rsesalthmk99 • q — A 1, V 9 TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES f I T Y OF HUTCHINSO.l; MINNESOTA • CUrdeE�uT RESIDENTIAL (Low to Mid- Density/R -1, R -2, R -3) 0 to 1 /2 acre $ 550 /unit $ 325 /unit '/2 to 3/4 acre $ 600 /unit $ 375 /unit 3/4 to 1 acre $ 680 /unit $ 440 /unit Over 1 acre $1,100 /acre $ 600 /acre HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R -4, R -5) All parcels $ 475 /unit $ 275 /unit COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL Negotiated* $ 1,700 /acre S 1,200 /acre * Varies due to diversity in utility use. Rate shall be no lower than those noted under "Residential -Over 1 acre". Trunk Storm Sewer Rates will be determined per project. A base rate of $0.05 /SF, or $2,200 /acre will be assumed for all low -to -mid density residential development. High density residential, commercial and industrial rates may be higher. Rates apply to all properties not previously assessed for trunk services provided All funds collected will be utilized to pay off trunk sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer costs incurred by the City. Connection fees will be added to Assessment Rolls when done in conjunction with improvement projects. The City shall have the option to collect the fee with the building permit in other areas. NOTE: 1999 Sanitary Sewer Retei based on increase of approximately i% from 1998 based on ENR Consuucuon cost ratio and Consultant Review. Water rates inaeaxd 10%d. to information derived from Wata Rate/Cost of Service Study preparation. 0 kMsiwr fate *February 1 1999 * N: LLSS'ESSITRUNK98.RAT � _/ . U II U411 JJ4 14: tl1 on l24J24Jb WELCal- TO OUR HOME Srwi/r H//Fiwp D//tI•)wrwe LY. July 22, 1999 Mr. John P. Rodeberg Director of Engineering. City of Hutchinsoe 111 Hum St SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Delivered via fax: 320 - 234 -4240 Dear Mr. Rodebexg; PAGE 01 As you requested, I researched our records over the past four months for our .. c dMge at Ridgeway on German in New Ulm. As we suspected, there is a very strops' correlation between ntmlbet of clients living in the btdld'ssg and water usage and the usage rate is considerable lower than in a typical home. Mouth # of Meter # 1 Meter # 2 Total Avg Match 30 300 300 600 20 April 35 300 500 800 22.85 May 40 400 400 800 20 June 45 400 500 900 20 i also asked the average usage for a typical home wad they indicted it was approximately 70 to 80, spin depending on the number of people living in a home. Our mix is 90% single perinea and IM /a couples. There ate so extra persons permitted to live in our units longer then seven days in a year to accommodate the occasional visitor or someone who wishes to My with a friend who is ill. The number quoted above includes the kitchen usage, but does not include the lawn sprinkler. We do not have adcelCrase number of reliable numbers on lawn sprinkling to detumm a trap& It would appear that an assisted living facility would use somewhere in the 30% arcs of a typical home. I would suggest then a WAC and SAC of some similar relationship. Thank you for your eoosWlecn ion If you regim any additional information, please let me know. S�in Dean R. Bloemke swrreas . a CO. Box 403 - Redwood Falls, MN 56283 • Phone: 50 -3235 - 1 SO- : (') : , :( is PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT (100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS) • LETTING NO. 16 PROJECT NO. 99-36 Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: July 27, 1999 • TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: We, all owners of real property known and described as Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and that the City assess the entire cost of the improvement against our property described below, and we hereby agreed to pay the entire cost as apportioned by the City. This petition shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. OWNERS SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SORENSEN & NAUSTDAL PROPERTIES, LLC Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4; Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and 1352 Heritage Ave NW Outiots A & B, 1) Hutchinson MN 55350 Rolling Meadows Addition Bruce Naustdal, Partner 1352 Heritage Ave NW 2) Hutchinson MN 55350 Denise Naustdal, Partner 3) 15589 620th Ave Litchfield MN 55355 Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4; Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and Outlots A & B, Rolling Meadows Addition Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4; Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and Outlots A & B, Rolling Meadows Addition Kon Sorensen, Partner Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4; Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6, Lot 1, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and 15589 620th Ave Outlots A & B. 4) Litchfield MN 55355 Rolling Meadows Addition Diane Sorensen, Partner Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for. Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator 9 -4 AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT, WAIVER OF HEARING AND • WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL LETTING NO. 16 PROJECT NO. 99-38 This Agreement, is made this 27th day of July, 1999, between the City of Hutchinson.: ate of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and Sorensen & Naustdal Properties, LLC, Bruce - and Denise Naustdal, Partners, of McLeod County, State of Minnesota, and Kon Sorensen ano Diane Sorensen, Partners, of Meeker County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as Owner. In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owners' request, to cause :, improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW In Rolling Meadows Addition !% construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances; and to assess 100% of the cost to the Owner. Owner agrees to pay said costs of said improvement not to exceed 9 660,000.00. plus interest, over a period ten (10) years. Owner expressly waives hearing and objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owners property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. In testimony, whereof, said Owner has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first above written. OWNERS SIGNATURE: IN PRESENCE OF: SORENSEN & NAUSTDAL PROPERTIES, LLC 1) Bruce Naustdal, Partner 2) Denise Naustdal, Partner 3) Kon Sorensen, Partner 4) Sorensen, Partner Date: July 27, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. I' a' 4 RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT LETTING NO. 16 PROJECT NO. 99-38 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: A certain petition requesting the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances, filed with the council on July 27th, 1999, is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035. 2. The petition is hereby referred to the Director of Engineering and that person is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost- effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the council this 27th day of July, 1999. City Administrator Mayor 49 1 111 Hassan SU W SE 1 Hutchlneon WnneeWS 5L1W25Z21 Phone (612)23442661 FAX (614) 234.4M E NGINEERINGW TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works DATE: July 27th, 1999 SUBJECT: Letting No. 16/Project No. 99 -38 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they be constructed. Project No. 99 -38: 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, trail and appurtenances ESTIMATED FUNDH*M 9434 Assessable Cost $426,000.00 Deferred Assessable Cost (30% of Assessable)„ $180,000.00 City Bonded (Storm Water) $30,000.00 City - Water/Sewer Funds $0.00 City — TIF $0.00 MSA $0.00 Mn/DOT $0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL $636,000.00 is cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department RESOLUTION NO. 1 7 • RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO.16 PROJECT NO. 99 -38 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted July 27th, 1999, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances; and said report was received by the Council on July 27th, 1999, WHEREAS, this improvement was petitioned for by 100% of the property owners and said property owners have waived hearing on said improvement, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement • pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $636,000.00. 2. The public hearing on said improvement is hereby waived. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator is RESOLUTION NO.11 2 76 • RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS LETTING NO. 16 PROJECT NO. 99 -38 WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances, was duly presented to the council on the 13th day of April, 1999; and WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted July 27th, 1999, a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering with reference to the improvement, and this report was received by the council on July 27th, 1999. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The council finds and determines that said petition was signed by all owners of real property abutting upon the street(s) names as the location of the improvement. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted July • 27th, 1999 3. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. /I �277 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING NO. 16 PROJECT NO. 99 -38 WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 pm on • Monday, August 23rd, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council on August 24th, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999. Mayor City Administrator • CITY OF HUTCHINSON CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON 3run -98 3un -99 ____ _ __ __ _ ______ ___ ___ ______ _ __ _ _____ ___ ______ ____ _ __ _ __ --------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- -- _------ TOTAL TOTAL LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY MEEK LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEER ----- -- - -- --- - --- -- ---- --- - -- ----- - --- -- --- -- -- - - -- " "- - ---- ---- - -------- `--- "" -- - - -- "' ---"'-` - - -" -- ___-- -_ 1 1,775 2,856 481 194 5,306 1 1,847 2,896 . 609 229 5,581 2 1,941 3,110 597 237 5,685 2 - 2,173 - 4,057 1,554 273 8,057 3 2,283 3,922 1,066 231 7,502 3 2,559 4,620 765 341 8,285 4 2,052 3,838 752 418 7,060 4 4,517 9,893 1,508 896 16,814 5 3,581 7,557 1,193 757 13,088 5 4,341 12,277 1,604 3,715 21,937 6 3,588 9,252 1,803 2,913 17,556 60,674 56,397 7 2,149 3,720 656 322 6,847 8 1,572 2,640 355 182 4,749 8 1,324 3,664 711 226 5,945 9 1,479 2,980 658 231 5,248 9 2,098 2,913 676 218 5,905 10 3,344 3,392 739 303 7,778 10 2,962 5,371 1,026 437 9,796 11 3,168 4,816 946 613 9,543 11 5,272 9,620 1,531 628 17,051 12 5,287 8,790 1,676 784 16,537 12 3,797, 9,982 1,532 1,557 16,868 13 3,920 8,909 1,684 1,641 16,154 62,412 60,009 14 2,540 3,319 584 276 6,719 15 2,130 3,905 513 234 6,782 15 1,788 3,048 659 195 5,690 16 1,676 3,330 399 309 5,714 16 2,530 4,369 757 312 7,968 17 1,998 3,527 714 355 6,594 17 2,666 5,706 1,121 635 10,128 18 2,671 4,835 788 369 8,663 18 4,962 9,333 1,516 591 16,402 19 4,198 8,301 1,247 642 14,308 19 4,814 12,488 1,997 1,174 20,473 20 4,913 11,188 1,678 1,248 19,027 67,380 - 61,168 21 2,291 3,328 459 312 - 6,390 - 22 1,884 3,090 563 290 5,827 22 1,568 4,213 614 208 6,803 23 1,654 2,934 389 287 5,264 23 2,355 4,321 662 339 7,677 24 1,937 3,855 455 309 6,556 24 2,346 5,711 715 376 9,148 25 2,543 4,710 654 372 8,279 25 4,442 10,495 1,348 805 17,090 26 3,887 9,177 1,053 950 15,067 26 3,877 9,020 1 1,115 15,623 27 4,009 8,547 1,268 881 14,705 62,731 55,696 26 2,218 2,881 594 191 5,884 29 2,242 3,561 457 637 6,897 29 2,332 4,276 663 262 7,755 30 1,907 3,421 678 .401 6,407 30 2,700 5,384 899 279 9,262 22,901 13,304 TOTAL 76,468 156,927 26,791 15,912 276,098 71,639 136,343 22,806 15,788 246,576 98 TOTAL 71,639 136,343 22,606 15,788 246,576 97 TOTAL, 62,881 135,497 21,616 15,743 235,737 %OF SALE 28 57 10 _ 6 100 8OF SALE 29 55 9 6 100 SALES INC OR DEC 29,522 12 4 SALES INC OR DEC 10,839 5 8 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1997 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL TOTAL BY WEEK 2 1,851 3,132 626 290 5,899 TOTAL 3 2,030 3,584 486 338 6,418 BY MEEX 4 2.171 4,307 - 612 433 7,523 5 2.302 6.050 855 397 9,604 8 3,808 8,873 1,457 971 14,909 7 3,959 8.861 1,253 3,214 17,287 5 3,511 7,557 1,193 757 13,081 61,440 9 2,692 3,375 344 377 6,788 10 1,719 3,122 533 251 5,825 56,397 11 1,894 3.894 699 317 6,804 12 1,819 5,170 793 553 8,335 13 4,819 9,024 1,359 1,435 16,638 14 4,105 12,430 1,845 1,243 19,623 12 5,217 0,790 1,676 714 16,537 63,813 16 1,354 3,512 1,023 238 6,127 17 1,582 3,190 427 284 5,483 60,009 16 1,785 3,208 529 284 5,806 19 2,158 4,201 1,280 316 7,953 20 3,752 7,734 1,314 632 13,432 21 3.421 7,695 1,289 667 13,273 19 4 8,301 1,247 642 14,388 52074 23 1.803 3,269 479 320 5,871 24 1,287 2,778 329 271 4.665 61,161 25 1,398 3,424 499 414 5,735 26 2,526 4,528 758 4e9 8.299 27 3,850 9,159 1,051 764 14,834 28 3,214 7,078 1,217 694 12,203 26 3,807 9 1,053 950 15,067 51,807 30 1,974 3,698 581 350 6,803 6,803 TOTAL 62,881 135,497 21,618 15,743 6,897 235,737 96 TOTALS 59.902 135,587 20,911 13.325 6,407 229.705 % OF SALE 27 57 9 7 100 SALES INC OR DEC 6,032 3 % CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON 71,639 97 TOTAL 62,801 %OF SALE Z9 SALES INC OR DEC 136,343 22,840 - '49 135,497 21,616 15,743 55 9 6 10,039 5 1 13,304 246,576 235,737 100 Sun -9e ----- --- ---- ---- - - ---- ------ -- -- ------ ------------- -- TOTAL - LIQUOR BEER MINE MISC. TOTAL BY MEEX 1 1,775 2,856 101 194 5,306 2 1,941 3,110 597 231 5,885 3 2,283 3,922 1,066 231 7,502 4 2,052 3,138 752 Ile 7,060 5 3,511 7,557 1,193 757 13,081 6 3,588 9,252 1,803 21913 17,556 56,397 8 1,572 2,640 355 182 4,749 9 1,479 21 ego 654 231 5,241 10 3,344 3,392 739 303 7,778 11 3,168 4,116 946 613 9,S43 12 5,217 0,790 1,676 714 16,537 13 3,920 1,909 1,684 1,641 16,154 60,009 15 2,130 3,905 513 234 6,782 16 11676 3,330 399 309 5,714 17 1,998 3,527 714 355 6 11 2,671 4,835 708 369 8,663 19 4 8,301 1,247 642 14,388 20 4,913 11,116 1,678 1,241 19,027 61,161 22 1,884 3,090 563 290 5,127 23 1,654 2,934 319 217 5,264 24 1,937 3,85S 455 309 6,556 25 2,543 4,710 654 372 8 26 3,807 9 1,053 950 15,067 27 4,009 1,547 1,261 111 14,705 55, 690 29 2,212 3,561 457 637 6,897 30 1,907 3,421 670 401 6,407 71,639 97 TOTAL 62,801 %OF SALE Z9 SALES INC OR DEC 136,343 22,840 - '49 135,497 21,616 15,743 55 9 6 10,039 5 1 13,304 246,576 235,737 100 e CITY OF HUTCHINSON CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1996 JUNE 1997 JUNE TOTAL TOTAL 1996 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK 1 3,251 8,249 1,296 999 13,795 2 1,651 3,132 626 290 5,699 13,795 3 2.030 3.584 466 338 6,418 3 2,311 2,748 594 297 5,950 4 2,171 4,307 612 433 7,523 4 1,530 3,001 416 183 5,130 5 2.302 6,050 855 397 9,604 5 1,727 2,857 478 264 5,328 6 3,808 8,873 1,457 971 14,909 6 2,221 4,812 781 260 8,074 7 3,959 8,861 1,253 3,214 17,287 7 3,506 7,889 1,263 769 13.437 9 2,892 3,375 344 377 8,788 61.440 B 3,526 10,691 1,467 2,346 18.030 10 1,719 3,122 533 251 5,625 10 1,425 3,246 494 299 5,464 55,947 11 1.894 3;894 699 317 8,804 11 1,902 3,501 530 316 6,249 12 1,819 5,170 793 553 8,335 12 1,688 3,735 478 349 8,230 13 4,819 9,024 1,359 1,436 16,638 13 2,332 5,077 841 484 8,734 14 4,105 12,430 1,845 1,243 19,823 14 3,320 9,899 1,747 682 15,648 16 1,354 3,512 1,023 238 6,127 63,813 15 3,796 10,389 1,526 1,103 16,814 17 1,582 3,190 427 284 5,483 17 1,373 2,196 327 168 4,084 59,139 18 1,785 3,208 529 284 5,606 18 1,397 2.374 468 202 4,441 19 2,156 4,201 1,280 316 7,953 19 1,698 3,037 612 299 5,646 20 3,752 7,734 1,314 632 13,432 20 1,676 4,105 529 298 6,608 21 3,421 7,896 1,289 867 13,273 21 3,129 7,299 1,030 728 12.186 23 1,803 3,269 479 320 5,871 52.074 22 3,097 7,141 1,086 647 11,971 24 1,287 2,778 329 271 4,665 24 1,556 2,789 482 166 4,993 44,916 25 1,398 3,424 499 414 5,735 25 1,554 3,145 533 247 5,478 26 Z5+26 . 4,528 756 489 8,299 26 1,774 4,250 580 251 6,855 27 _ 3,860 9,159 1,051 764 14,834 27 2,198 5,564 961 416 9,139 28 3,214 7,078 1,217 894 12,203 28 4,141 8,558 1,200 828 14,525 30 1,974 3,898 581 350 6,803 51,607 29 3,794 9,007 1,192 924 14,917 6 55,9118 TOTAL 62,681, 135,497 21,616 15,743 235,737 TOTAL 59,902 135,667 20,911 13,325 229,705 96 TOTALS 59.902 135,567 20,911 13,325 229,705 95 TOTAL 58,786 125.729 20,146 11,350 216,011 % OF SALE 27 57 9 7 100 ,% OF SAL 26 59 9 6 100 SALES INC OR DEC 8,032 3 % SALES INC OR DEC 13,694 6 % CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1995 3,251 8,249 1,298 999 JUNE 3 2,311 2,748 594 297 TOTAL 1995 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK 1 2,066 4,189 828 292 7,375 8 2 3278 7,723 1,301 719 13,019 3,508 3 3,649 8,784 1,277 2,141 15,851 10,691 1,467 2,346 18.030 10 1,425 3,246 36,245 5 1,189 2,537 431 184 4,341 316 6 1,290 2,946 378 228 4,842 6,230 7 1,539 2,507 424 151 4,621 14 8 1,870 2,969 528 278 5,643 3,796 9 3,186 5,849 905 500 10,440 2,196 10 3,157 5,594 949 539 10,239 468 202 4,441 19 t,698 3,037 812 40,126 12 2,244 2,939 462 226 5,871 6,608 13 1,503 3,859 951 410 6,723 22 14 2,091 3,825 483 391 6,790 1,556 15 2,023 4,939 676 364 8,002 3,145 16 3,093 8,375 1,193 611 13,272 580 17 3,817 11,193 1,638 1,208 1708 416 9,139 28 4,141 8,558 1,200 628 58,514 19 1,277 2,688 451 212 4,628 20 1,072 2,605 340 240 4257 21 1,976 3,372 558 297 8,203 22 1,753 4,295 702 355 7,105 23 3,204 6,870 1,063 176 11,313 24 2,871 6,983 1,002 176 11,032 44,538 26 1,198 2,322 381 239 4,140 27 1,378 2,368 515 262 4,521 28 1,686 3,067 415 287 5,455 29 2,333 4,566 912 274 8,085 30 4,045 8,367 1,363 592 14,387 36.588 TOTAL 58,786 125,729 20,146 11,350 218,011 94 TOTALS 47,655 102,951 15,059 8,397 174,062 % OF SALE 27 58 9 5 100 SALES INC OR DEC 41,949 24% CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1998 1996 0 JUNE TOTAL 1996 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK 1 3,251 8,249 1,298 999 13,795 3 2,311 2,748 594 297 5,950 4 1,530 3,001 416 183 5,130 5 1,727 2,857 478 264 5,328 8 2,221 4,812 781 260 8,074 7 3,508 7,899 1,283 789 13,437 8 3,526 10,691 1,467 2,346 18.030 10 1,425 3,246 494 299 5,464 11 1,902 3,501 530 316 8,249 12 1,888 3,735 478 349 6,230 13 2,332 5,077 841 484 8,734 14 3,320 9,899 1,747 682 15,648 15 3,796 10,389 1,528 1,103 16,814 17 1,373 2,196 327 168 4,064 18 1,397 2,374 468 202 4,441 19 t,698 3,037 812 299 5.646 20 1,676 4,105 529 298 6,608 21 3,129 7,299 1,030 728 12,188 22 3,097 7,141 1,088 647 11,971 24 1,556 2.789 482 168 4,993 25 1,554 3,145 533 247 5,479 28 1,774 4,250 580 251 6,855 27 2,198 5,564 981 416 9,139 28 4,141 8,558 1,200 628 14,525 29 3,794 9,007 1,192 924 14,917 TOTAL 59,902 135,587 20,911 13,325 95 TOTAL 58,786 125,729 20,146 11,350 % OF SAL 26 59 1 6 SALES INC OR DEC 13,694 13,795 55,947 59,139 44,916 55,908 229,705 218,011 100 % R i CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1994 1995 , JUNE JUNE TOTAL 1994 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK 1 2,169 2,314 179 195 4,857 828 2 1,786 3,451 441 249 5,927 1,301 3 2,452 6,778 1,009 489 10,728 1,277 4 2,667 7,808 1,040 1,090 12,605 36,245 5 1,189 2,537 34,117 6 1,192 2,577 349 201 4,319 378 7 1,164 1,836 363 121 3,484 424 8 1,133 2,081 406 157 3,777 528 9 1,454 3,176 566 288 5,484 905 10 2,379 5,691 719 388 9,177 949 11 2,646 6.247 1,039 630 10,562 40,126 12 2,244 2,939 36,803 13 1,274 2,577 438 169 4,458 951 14 1,331 2,978 404 213 4,926 483 15 1,300 2,475 368 132 4,275 676 16 1,796 3,906 487 257 6,446 1,193 17 2,601 6,226 820 414 10,061 1,638 18 3,305 7,633 1,170 680 12,988 58,514 19 1,277 2,688 43,154 20 1,110 2,053. 286 157 3,606 340 21 1,286 2,763 353 214 4,616 558 22 1,186 2,417 413 207 4,223 702 23 2,005 3,351 453 209 6,018 1,063 24 2,426 6,429 845 490 10,190 1,002 25 2,489 5,940 1,087 552 10,068 44.538 26 1,198 2,322 38,721 27 1,086 2,391 299 152 3,928 515 28 1,255 2,366 339 186 4,146 415 29 1,425 3,054, 566 213 5,258 912 30 2,738 4,233 620 344 7,935 1,383 592 14,387 21,267 TOTAL 47,655 102,951 15,059 8,397 125,729 174,062 93 TOTAL 41,523 80,941 12,836 6,644 102,951 141,944 % OF SALE 27 59 9 5 58 100 SALES INC OR DEC 100 32,118 OR DEC 23 % 0 r •' CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON JUNE 1995 JUNE TOTAL 1995 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK 1 2,066 4,189 828 292 7,375 2 3,276 7,723 1,301 719 13,019 3 3,649 8,784 1,277 2,141 15,851 36,245 5 1,189 2,537 431 184 4,341 6 1,290 2,946 378 228 4,842 7 1,539 2,507 424 151 4,621 8 1,870 2,969 528 276 5,643 9 3,186 5,849 905 500 10,440 10 3,157 5,594 949 539 10,239 40,126 12 2,244 2,939 462 226 5,871 13 1,503 3,859 951 410 6,723 14 2,091 3,825 483 391 6,790 15 2,023 4,939 676 364 8,002 16 3,093 8,375 1,193 611 13,272 17 3,817 11,193 1,638 1,208 17,856 58,514 19 1,277 2,688 451 212 4,628 20 1,072 2,605 340 240 4257 21 1,976 3,372 558 297 6,203 22 1,753 4,295 702 355 7,105 23 3,204 6,870 1,063 176 11,313 24 2,871 6,983 1,002 176 11,032 44.538 26 1,198 2,322 381 239 4,140 27 1,378 2,366 515 262 4,521 28 1,686 3,067 415 287 5,455 29 2,333 4,566 912 274 8,065 30 4,045 8,367 1,383 592 14,387 36.588 TOTAL 58,786 125,729 20,146 11,350 216,011 94 TOTALS 47,655 102,951 15,059 8,397 174,062 % OF SALE 27 58 9 5 100 SALES INC OR DEC 41,949 24 % 0 Dater 07/01/99 Time: 09:57:34 Paget I Item code Description DEPTNO -) I (LIM) Cant 1277 Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -) 2 (BEER) Count 626 Subtotals -) DEPTND - -) 3 ININEI Cant 1160 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE) Cant 2 Subtotals-). DEPTNO -) 9 MENIAL) Cant 3 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -> 10 IT09ACCO PHOD(%:IS) •t 425 Subtotals -) DEPTNU -> 90 (MISC BFER) Count I Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -) 91 (MISC LIM) Cant 1 subtotals - -> DEPTNO -> 92 (MISC NINE) Cant 1 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Cant " 471 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 94 (MISSY.' NU 1A1) Count 89 subtotals - -) Cant 3056 Totals -) (TUES)6 /01 /99- MTD Sales Report (WED)6/30 /99 LIM HUTCH on Extended - -- Month to date sales - - Cls ordr Q-" cost Qty Cast Markdowns Sales Profits 61) % 29637 210586.28 7266 10283 70489.02 16257 20956 107174.57 4692 1787 189 2308 7383.36 1248 59237.84 123361.37 17471.22 499.81 25.00 3103.51 773.26 75696.46 985.74 155940.73 600.33 26190.70 3015.13 567.00 15.90 4223.34 16458.62 21.7 32579.36 20.9 8719.48 33.3 2525.26 83.8 542.00 95.6 1119.83 26.5 fill! !!!!! 2534 4038.42 1804 5155.57 56.85 7165.68 2010.11 28.1 905 1621.87 268 560.74 5.97 860.25 299.51 34.8 ........ xcsr...... ... =Z= =S ] CCC .... =9 224th. aO ........ a. cfuausas ...C[ 66623 401293.52 33511 209405.12 2438.05 273659.29 64254.17 23.5 • r Date: 07/01N9 Time: 08:47:40 Page 1 YTD Sales Report LIQUOR HUTCH (SAT)1. ?/99- (WED) AO/99 Extended------- - - - - -- -Year to Deis Sales --- -- -- -- Item Coda Description Q-O -H Cost Qty Cost Markdowns Sales Profits OP% DEPTH04 I (Liquor) Comet 1277 Subtota1 29637 21058628 40305 313284.86 3441.12 401856.48 85571.62 22.0 DEPTNOi (Beer) ...... ».. _ .. ....... ....... .... ._.. ......... ........ ...... Count 616 Subtota14 10283 70499.02 76620 55233399 3281.77 703220.80 152186.81 21.7 DEPTH04 (Wme) .. ....... ....... ....... ........ .... -... ......•. ..... Count 1160 Subtotal4 20956 10717457 23142 9422528 2616b1 140903.37 346677.49 33.1 DEPTNO4 $(Ice) DEPTNO-+ 92 (Misc wine) 51055.39 6311.69 5256.30 83.3 - 33.00 ........ ......... 1033.01 ........ 1020.01 ..... 96.7 16143.73 119.80 22287.66 6143.93 274 (Msc iquor) .......... ....... ....... ....... ........ Count 1 Sukota14 •••••••••••••�••••�•• Comt 2 subtotals 4131 DEPTH04 9 (Rental) ------ ---- ....... ....... Count 3 subtotal4 318 DEPTNO410 (Tobacco Products) --- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ....... CoWt42S Subt o tal4 2308 7383.36 6318 DDTN0490 (Misc Beer) --- - - - - -- ....... ....... Count 1 Subtotals ••• DEPTNO-3 91 I Coat 1 SObtota14 DEPTH04 93 (Misc 6.5%) Count 271 Subtotal4 22334 4038.42 6843 DEPTNO-� 94 (Mize No Tax) .......... .... ..... Count 00 Subtotal-) 90S 1621.87 1369 COUNTS: 3856 TOTALS- » ». 13130.72 ........ 263.22 ---- ---- 18796.40 3645.68 30.0 ....... 2682.43 ........ 21.15 ......... 4084.83 ........ 1402-38 ..... 34.3 _.._... _. » _. ........ ......... 66623 40129331 158849 992914.02 9745.73 110051624 30760222 23.7 7 0 DEPTNO —> 9 (RENTAL) Cant 3 Subtotals - -) - - -- -` 9 40 —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Cant 425 Subtotals - -) -- - - -- - -- 7383.36 29.2 2308 7373.71 10435.16 DEPTNO - -> 90 (MISC BEER) Cant I Subtotals —) -- +++++ DEPTNU —> 91 IMIS'C LIgl ) "AS OF: 10PM" 07/01/99 --- -' - - -` - -- - -- '— 10:00:07 quantity On Hand Report MH (WED)06 /30/99 Page: 1 LIM HITCH Cant 1 Subtotals —) CIS Ave. Cost Ext p1/ Cost Price I Dn Kit / Item Code Description Vendor Cross reference Last Cost Ext L Cast Ext Price 1 Bp % Min ordr q-O-H Trnsfr DEPTNO —) 1 (LIQUOR) Count 1277 Subtotals —) - -'- -- -- ' - -- 4038.42 2105&6.28 23.2 29637 4025.83 210354.77 274023.68 _ DEPTNO - -> 2 (BEER) Count 626 Subtotals--> - - -- ---' - — 1621.87 70489.02 22.2 10283 1598.06 70560.10 90574.60 DEPTNO —) 3 (WINE) :...:..::.. .. ... .... =- �_... :C. :n.: Count 1160 Subtotals —> 26.9 - -- -- -- - - - -- - --- 400190.49 548771.04 107174.57 35.0 20956 106218.02 164843.57 DEPTNU —> 5 (ICE) Cant 2 Subtotals —)' -- - — DEPTNO —> 9 (RENTAL) Cant 3 Subtotals - -) - - -- -` 9 40 —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Cant 425 Subtotals - -) -- - - -- - -- 7383.36 29.2 2308 7373.71 10435.16 DEPTNO - -> 90 (MISC BEER) Cant I Subtotals —) -- +++++ DEPTNU —> 91 IMIS'C LIgl ) Cant l Subtotals - -) --- -' - - -` - -- - -- '— MH DEPTNO —> 92 (MISC WINE) Cant 1 Subtotals —) - - -- - - -- -^ MR DEPTNO —) 93 (M15'C 6.5 %) Count 271 Subtatals—> - -'- ' - - -- 4038.42 35.1 2534 4025.83 6223.08 DEPTNO —> 94 (MISC NO TAX) Count 89 Subtotals - -> - - -- �- 1621.87 38.3 905 1598.06 2626.95 0t 3856 Totals —> :...:..::.. .. ... .... =- �_... :C. :n.: 401293.52 26.9 66623 400190.49 548771.04 Date: 07/01/98 Tice: 06:39:17 Page: l Item code Description DEPTNO - -) 1 (LIQUOR) Count 1146 Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -) 2 (PEER) Count 565 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 3 (WINE) Count 1109 Subtotals - -> DEPTNO - -> 5 (ICE) Count 2 Subtotals -) DEPTNO ) 9 (RENTAL) Count 3 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROOUCTS) Count 403 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count I Subtotals -> DEPTNO -) 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count 1 Subtotals - -> DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC WINE) Count I Subtotals - -) DEPTNO -) 93 (MISC 6.5%) Count 286 Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -) 94 (MISC NO TAX) Count 86 Subtotals - -) Count 3603 Totals - -) (MON)6/01 /98- (TUES)6 /30/98 Sorts: DEPTN' MTD Sales Report Ranges: DEPRA: LIM HUTCH Summary: Yes on Extended - - Month to date tales -- Cis ordr Q -D-H Cost Qty Cost Markdowns ! Sales Profits GP % 24157 113334.32 7216 55432.01 672.67 70965.20 15533.19 21.9 10761 704Bb.41 14979 106700.07 749.67 135594.86 2BB94.79 21.3 17608 90485.89 4034 14990.92 455.86 22351.01 7360.09 32.9 1502 401.80 2500.98 2099.18 83.9 - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - ---- - - - --- - -- - - -- 174 5.00 525.00 520.00 99.0 3186 9741.26 1850 4545.76 111.98 6179.55 1633.79 26.4 ttf#t tffff t # #ft 3931 b020.32 1610 4123.56 54.02 5624.23 1500.67 26.7 935 1867.55 250 496.04 7.46 784.42 288.38 36.8 _3 p L]LGLiCi _iiSGii C:GS G i iG 3 L L b0578 351935.75 31615 186695.16 2051.66 244525.25 57830.09 23.6 4 0 Date: 07/01/98 Time: 06:40:00 Page: I Item code Description DEPTND - -) 1 (LIM) Count 1146 Subtatals--> DEPTND -> 2 (DEER) Count 565 Subtotals - -> DEPTND -> 3 (NINE) Count 1109 Subtotals -) DEPTND - > 5 (ICE) Count 2 Subtotals - -) DEPTND -> 9 (RENTAL) Count 3 Subtotals -) DEPTND - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) •nt 403 Subtotals-) DEPTND - -> 90 (M1SC BEER) Count 1 Subtotals - -> DEPTND - -> 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count I Subtotals--) DEPTND i 92 (MISC WINE) Count 1 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO - -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 286 Subtotals -> DEPTND - -) 94 (MISC NO TAXI Count B6 Subtotals -> Count 3603 Totals - -> (FR 01 /02/98 - (TUES )6/30/98 YTD Sales Report LIQUOR HUTCH Extended - - - - - -- Cle Q cost qty Sorts: DEPTNB Ranges: DEPTND Summary: Yes - Year to Date Sales - - -- - -- - Cost Markdowns Sales Profits BP % 24157 173334.32 37676 289640.25 3337.67 370768.54 81128.29 21.9 10761 70486.41 75484 501988.33 2608.37 647342.39 139354.06 21.5 17608 90485.89 21643 86108.92 2297.26 128302.34 42193.42 32.9 4004 991.20 5867.96 4876.76 B3.1 -- - -- - - ---- - - - - -- 324 - - - - - -- 10100 - 1152.00 1142.00 99.1 - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- -- 3186 9741.26 9449 - -- - -- -- 21868.46 515.01 30112.72 8244.26 27.4 at+a+ ** Ha taaaa - -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 3931 6020.32 7115 11905.46 204.83 16852.96 4947.50 29.4 935 1867.55 1210 2424.39 24.55 3734.22 1309.83 35.1 == =- = = == = -= ---- = =-- === -== =-_ ___ _____ ___ :__ :__: = = =-_ 60578 351935.75 156905 920937.01 8987.69 1204133.13 283196.12 23.5 9 i Date: 07/01/98 Time: 06:36 :17 Page: t Item Code Description quantity On Hand Report LIQUOR HUTCH CIS Ave. Cost Vendor Cross reference Last Cost Ext Av Cost Ext L Cost "AS OF: 10PM (TUES)6 /30/98" Price 1 On Ext Price 1 Sp % Min : ^dr q-O -H Kit / Trnsfr DEPTNO —) I (LIQUOR) --- - - - -- - - -- - -- -- — --- - - -- Count 1146 Subtotals - -> - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- 173334.32 23.3 24157 172724.47 226119.92 DEPTNO —) 2 (BEER) Count 565 Subtatals—) -- -- — - - -- 70486.41 22.4 10761 70644.95 90842.58 DEPTNO —) 3 (WINE) Count 1109 Subtotals —> - -- -- -- 90485.89 35.3 17608 90231.20 139854.61 DEPTNO —) 5 (ICE) Count 2 Subtatals —) - -- ttt +t DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL) Count 3 Subtotals —) -- -- - -- tt +++ • DEPTNO —) IO (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Count 403 Subtotals —) - - -- - - -- -- 9741.26 29.5 3186 9761.51 13826.53 DEPTNO —) 90 (MISC BEER) Count 1 Subtotals —) — - - -- - -- DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count 1 Subtatals—) — - - -- - -- -- t++++ DEPTNO - -) 92 (MISC WINE) Count 1 Subtotals —) — - - - -- — tt+ ++ DEPTNO - -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 286 Subtotals —) - -- - - -- 6020.32 32.7 3931 5992.49 8945.19 DEPTNO - -) 94 (MISC NO TAX) Count 86 Subtotals —) — — — - - -- 1867.55 35.6 935 1838.49 2900.65 Count 3603 Totals - -) _xzC- = = = = :_ __ = -= _ :._ : =, 351935.75 27.1 60578 351193.11 482489.48 r 0 Date: 07/01/97 Time: 10:47:05 Page: 1 Item cads Description DEPTNO -) t (LIgl10H) Count 1069 5ubtotali- -i DEPTNO -> 2 (BEER) Count 560 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO - -) 3 (WINE) Count 1059 8ubtotals- DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE) Count 2 Subtotals - -) DEPTHO -) 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 5uhtatals -) DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) O wnt 343 Subtotals -) DEPTHO -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count l Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 91 IMISC LIQl10R1 Count 1 Subtotals -> DEPTNO - -i 92 (MISC WINE) Count 1 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 279 Suhtatais - -> DEPTNO -> 94 (MISC NO TAX) Count 6+) Subtotals -) Count '7 latals - -i HUTCH' On Extended - - -- Cls ordr [---H cost Qty (MON)$ 11 /97- (MONO30/97 - Manth to date sales Cast Markdowns Sales Profits BP % 25851 tGO021.61 6270 48677.36 703.49 62174.42 13497.06 21.7 10176 64568.54 15100 106477.93 598.36 134896.48 28418.55 21.1 17079 79518.13 4099 14114.57 467.11 21147.38 7032.81 7.3.3 - �- - 1776 449.00 2734.62 2285.62 83.6 -- - - -- - 148 452.02 452.02 100.0 2753 7571.86 1963 4242.33 120.27 5650.77 1408.44 24.9 t 0.92 0.92 100.0 tt#{rrt 3590 5856.79 1767 4444.15 89.87 61(24.78 1660.63 27.2 852 L589.52 -- - 207 399.35 4.94 586.78 187.43 31.9 607e)7 7 .:9126.45 31M 178&)4.69 1984.04 253748.17 54943.48 23.5 0 x • Date: 07101/97 Time: 10 :53:08 Page: t 0LIOLPR L HUTCH" Extended - Cls Q -O-N cost qty (FRI) 1 /3/97 - (MON)0/30/97 -- Year to Date Bales - - -- Cost Markdowns Sales Profits 8P % Itea code Description DEPTNO -i 1 (LIQUORI Count 1089 S'ubtotals--) DEPTNO - -> 2 (BEEJI) Count 560 Subtotals - -> DEPTNO -> 3 (WINE) Count 1059 uubtotals- -> DEPTNO - -> 5 LICE) Count 2 Subtotals -> DEPTNO - -> 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 Subtotals - -> DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Count 343 Subtotals -> DEPTNO - -7 90 (MISC BEER) Count t Subtotals-) DEPP - M -i 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count 1 Subtatals-i DEPTNO - -i 92 (MISC Wilk) Count 1 Subtotals - -> DEPTNO -> 93 (MLSC 6.5%) Count 279 Subtatals--> DEPTNO -> 94 IMISC M TAXI Count 60 Wbtotals--} Count 3397 Totais -> 25857 IM121.61 36062 272805.35 3420.73 349254.77 76449.42 21.9 10176 64568.54 70895 472973.64 2531.77 601243.96 128270.32 21.3 17079 79518.13 21071 00470:52 2404.86 121002.20 40523.68 33.5 3603 858.95 5238.97 4380.02 63.6 2 266 663.02 663.02 100.0 2753 7571.86 9357 2yJI01.11 305.52 27407.53 7306.42 26.7 +t+++ 3540 5856.79 7t59 122t1.56 U447. 4y) 17111.56 4900.02 28.6 852 1589.52 968 1916.98 21.57 2834.04 917.06 32.4 6CJ307 3MI26,45 149381 861346.11 6991.65 1124976.07 263629.96 23.4 • DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 Subtatal� > 0 - - - -- -- --' -- - -- + t+tt DEPTNO - -) 16 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Count 343 Subtotals —> -- -- — — —' -- - -- ' --- 7571.86 9.8 2753 7602.61 10787.48 DEPTNG - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count i Subtotals - =: - --- --- ' - -- — ' - - -- - -- DEPTNO —> 91 (MISC LIM) Count l Subtotals—? -- -- - - -' - - -- ' - -' tt + +t DEPTND - -) 92 (MISC WINE) Count t Subtotals--) --- -- '— '— DEPTNO —) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 279 Subtotals - -> i 'LIQUOR 5886.E 8841.56 DEPTNO - -> 94 (MISC NO TAX) HUTCH' taunt Ea) Subtotals— : -- - - -- - - - -- -- - --- - - - -- - te: 97!(11/97 1569.52 31.8 852 Ov - nt 397 Totals - -i AS OF: 10PM Lae: 11:5':10 quantity On Hand Report (MQN)6 130/97 Page: 1 LIQU(Il WICK r_ls AVG. Cost Ext Ay Cost Price 1 On kit t Item Cade Description Vendor Crass reference Last Cast Ext L Cost Ext Price t Gp X Min ordr Q-0--H Trnsfr DEPTNO - -> 1 (LIM) Count 1069 Subtotals --i --�— - ' - - - "- -- ' -- 180021.61 13.3 25857 119866.47 234774.73 DEPTNO --> 2 (BEER) Gaunt 56ti Subtotals--, -- -- - -' -- - -- "- 64568.54 u. 10176 64576.49 & 3M 7 .64 DEPTNO - -) 3 (WINE) Count 1059 Subtotals - -> - -- - -- -- -- 79518.13 34.6 17079 79815.90 121526.29 DEPTNO - -) 5 (ICE) Count 2 Subtotals —) -- —" - -- - - -- - -- FNH DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 Subtatal� > 0 - - - -- -- --' -- - -- + t+tt DEPTNO - -) 16 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Count 343 Subtotals —> -- -- — — —' -- - -- ' --- 7571.86 9.8 2753 7602.61 10787.48 DEPTNG - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count i Subtotals - =: - --- --- ' - -- — ' - - -- - -- DEPTNO —> 91 (MISC LIM) Count l Subtotals—? -- -- - - -' - - -- ' - -' tt + +t DEPTND - -) 92 (MISC WINE) Count t Subtotals--) --- -- '— '— DEPTNO —) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 279 Subtotals - -> - ---- - - - - - -- - -- - - -- 5856.79 33.8 3590 5886.E 8841.56 DEPTNO - -> 94 (MISC NO TAX) taunt Ea) Subtotals— : -- - - -- - - - -- -- - --- - - - -- - 1569.52 31.8 852 Ov - nt 397 Totals - -i 1559.16 7364.28 = _'________ ___'_______ - = === 7 7.39126.45 26.5 6ON7 339306.85 461328.98 i ['ate: 96!30196 lime: 09 :45 :57 Faoa: I Itea code Description DEPTNO - -> I ILIMI Gaunt 992 Subtotals -) CEPTN7 -) 2 (BEER) Crnmt 602 Subtotals -> DEPTNO -) 3 (WINE) Count 936 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO -} 5 )ICE) Caint 3 Subtotals -> DEPTNO --> 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 Subtotals -7 DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) Count 228 Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -> 90 (M1SC BEER) Count t Subtatals -> DEPTNO -) 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count 1 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -> 92 (MISC WINE) Count t Subtotals -) DEPTHO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 330 Subtotals -> 'LIQUOR (SAT)6/l/96- HUTCHO (SAT)6/29/96 On Extended - --- - - Month to date sales Cls ordr Q-O-H cost Qty Cost Markdowns Sales Profits 6P % 23320 160915.61 553.67 59347.58 13156.41 22.2 46191.17 6412 8524 51268.83 14969 106483.45 537.59 135030.96 28547.51 21.1 21269 715B1.35 4124 13682.58 338.59 20570.43 6887.85 33.5 1609 468.20 2545.29 2077.09 81.6 97 589.03 589.03 1* 1823 3834.73 1715 3166.65 39.39 4275.90 1109.25 25.9 +t+t* 5134 7670.47 1812 4127.78 109.61 5767.01 1639.23 28.4 Carat 3096 Totals -7 - --- --- - -- - - - --- - 60070 VK71.25 30758 174119.83 1579.05 228126.20 54006.37 23.7 0 Gat ?: 06130!96 Tine: 09:46:39 Pa:go: I Item code Description DEPTN7 - -i I (LIM) CDjnt 992 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO --) 2 (BEER) Count 602 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 3 (NINEI Count 936 Subtatals- -) DEPTtd] i 5 (ICE) Count 3 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO -i 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 5ubtatals-) * PTNO -7 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) ount 228 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 90 (MISC EEER) Count 1 Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -i 91 (MISC LIQUOR) Count 1 Subtotals - -) DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC WINE) Count 1 Subtotals- -) DEPTNO - -7 93 (MISC 6.5%) Count 330 Subtatals -) Count 3096 Totals -) 'LIQUOR HUTCH' Extended -- Cls 9-0-N cost qty (WED)1/3/96- (SAT)6/29/96 - -- Year to Date Sales -- - Cost Markdowns Sales Profits BP X 23320 160915.87 33705 255636.55 3428.59 326361.85 70725.30 21.7 8524 51268.83 68638 454239.45 1917.81 579900.47 125661.02 21.7 21269 71581.35 20680 74876.45 2402.50 111831.03 36954.58 33.0 3158 733.40 4516.80 3783:40 83.8 130 909.04 909.04 100.0 1823 3834.73 7878 15149.61 261.52 20306.09 5156.48 25.4 +l +t+ * ++t* R *+*# 5134 7670.47 7988 13546.58 255.90 18938.94 5392.36 28.5 ----- 60070 295271.25 142177 814182.04 8266.32 1062764.22 248582.1B 23.4 0 DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROIXICTS) Count 228 Subtatals--> 3834.73 29.3 1823 3946.40 5425.08 DEPTNO - -> Sri (MISC BEER) Count l Subtotals—> _ -- —_ _ — - -- M** DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIM) Count I Subtotals —) _ - -- ___ - -- —_ DEPTNO —) 92 (NISC NINE) Count 1 Subtotals —> DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Corot 330 subtotals —) - - -- - - - -- — 7670.47 32.6 5134 7527.31 11376.36 Calint 3096 Totals _____ ,_,___: 295271.25 26.9 60070 292921.81 404203.37 "LIQU0R 0 HUTCH" Date: 06730796 AS OF: 10PM rime: 09 :47:12 quantity On Hand Report (SAT)6/29/96 Pace: t CIS Ave. Cost Ext Av Cost Price l On Kit I Item Code Description Vendor Cross reference Last Cost --- - - -- Ext L Cost Ext Price 1 8p X Min ordr q-O-H Trnsfr OEPTNO - -i l ILI0.JOR1 - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - --- -- -- — — -- - -_— Count 992 Subtatals—> — - - -- -- - -_ 160915.87 23.5 23320 158967.66 210391.78 DEPTNO - -) 2 (BEERI Count 602 Subtotals —) - -- - - - -- — 51268.83 i.6 8524 51312.94 66197.56 DEPTNO —> 3 (MINE) Count 936 Subtotals —) -- ____ - -__ _ —_ 71581.35 35.4 21269 71167.50 110812.59 DEPTNO —) 5 (ICE) Count 3 Subtatals—) ----- — _ —__ DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL) Count 2 Subtotals—) - - -- -- _ —__ -- DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROIXICTS) Count 228 Subtatals--> 3834.73 29.3 1823 3946.40 5425.08 DEPTNO - -> Sri (MISC BEER) Count l Subtotals—> _ -- —_ _ — - -- M** DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIM) Count I Subtotals —) _ - -- ___ - -- —_ DEPTNO —) 92 (NISC NINE) Count 1 Subtotals —> DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Corot 330 subtotals —) - - -- - - - -- — 7670.47 32.6 5134 7527.31 11376.36 Calint 3096 Totals _____ ,_,___: 295271.25 26.9 60070 292921.81 404203.37 wo 0 Date: 07/01/95 'one: 13:46:28 Te: 1 Item code Description DEPTNO - -) 1 (LIQIIDR) Count 858 Subtatals -) DEPTNO -> 2 (BEER) Count 551 Subtatals--> DEPTNO - -> 3 (MINE) Count 791 Subtotals -> DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE) Count 3 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 9 (RENTAL) Count I Subtotals -> # TNO -) 10 (TOBACCO PROg1CTS) nt 150 Subtotals -) HFTNO - -) 90 IMISC BEER) ImInt 1 Subtotals -) .cPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LlgllC4t) Calnt 1 Subtotals -) DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC NINE) Count I Subtotals -) DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 262 Subtotals -) Gwnt 2619 Totals - -) "LIQUOR (THURS)6 /l /95- HUTCH" (FRI.)6/30/95 On Extended Month to date sales Cls ordr Q-0-H cost qty Cost Markdmms Sales Profits 6P % 21610 151902.34 5981 45635.13 446.67 58139.05 12503.92 21.5 9196 50986.69 15014 98645.14 480.93 125249.49 26604.35 21.2 15593 58380.71 4163 13427.81 310.97 19843.69 6415.813 32.3 1595 294.93 2356.05 2061.12 87.5 31 1538 2648.49 1501 2687.98 2 4 310.00 310.00 100.0 37.70 3605.63 917.65 25.5 saaas 1.00 1.00 100.0 -7.19 -7.19 100.0 4726 6738.41 1970 4078.48 90.76 5741.37 1662.89 29.0 aesasasa aaases - -saa .aria..• seasseeaas vaasamaa ...sass ea • ....... as aaaa 52663 270656.64 30261 164769.47 1367.03 215239.09 50469.62 23.4 0 r Date: 07/01/95 -`ae` 13`5006 qe: l Item code Description - Cls Q-O-H 'LIQUOR HUTCH' Extended - -- cost Qty (MON)1 /2/95 - (FRI)6130/95 - -- Year to Date Sales Cast Markdowns Sales Profits 0 8P % DEPTNO --) 1 (Ligl10R) - - -- -- - -- - - Count 858 Subtotals -) -- _ - 21610 151902.34 37136 244009.80 3361.08 309978.87 65969.07 21.3 DEPTNO -) 2 (BEER) Count MI Subtotals -) - -- - -- -- - 9196 50986.69 65471 402877.36 1412.55 512444.46 109567.10 21.4 DEPTNO - -) 3 (MINE) Cant 791 Subtotals -> - -- - - - -- - 15593 58380.71 17215 60582.85 992.58 89762.12 29179.27 32.5 DEPTNO - -> 5 (ICE) Count 3 Subtotals-) - 3092 667.45 4517.28 3849.83 85.2 DEPTNO -) 9 (RENTAL) Count 1 Subtotals -> - - - - 60 600.00 600.00 100.0 DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROD(1CTS) Count 150 Subtotals -) - -- - -- - -� 1538 2648.49 6963 12047.82 163.50 16061.08 4013.26 25.0 DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count t Subtotals - -) - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- 2 H"I _.PTNO -) 91 (MISC LIU") Cant I Subtotals -) - - - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -- 4 1.00 1.00 100.0 DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC MINE) Count 1 Subtotals -> -- - -- -- -- - - -7.19 -7.19 100.0 DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 262 Subtotals -) -- - - - -- - -- -- - 4726 6738.41 7973 12583.86 225.67 17994.18 5410.32 30.1 Count 2619 Totals -) .... 8 ......seae - =. .... = eavc ;ussa ......... .......... ao•vim•e v.ev 52663 270656.64 133016 732769.14 6155.58 951351.80 218582.66 23.0 0 DEPTHO —) 9 (REMTAL) mt 1 Subtatals —) -- -- +ttt+ PTNO —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) .aunt 150 Subtatals —) -- — -- _- 2648.49 27.3 1538 2650.61 3642.96 DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count I Subtotals —) — — -- -- tt+ ++ DEPTNO —) 91 (MISC LIQUM) Count 1 Subtatals —) — — — t + + ++ DEPTNO —) 92 MISC NINE) Count I Subtotals - -> ttt ++ DEPTMfJ —> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 262 Subtotals - -> —_ 6738.41 31.7 4726 6732.65 9667.37 Count 2619 Totals --) ::veeav vvevssva.. xeevv at�uva 270656.64 25.7 52663 242081.10 364476.66 'LIQUOR ete: HUTCH" 07/01/95 AS OF: 10PM �me: 14:06:21 quantity On Hand Report (FRI)6/30/95 ge: 1 Cis Ave. Cost Ext Ay Cast Price I On Kit / Item Cade Description Vendor Cross reference Last Cost Ext L Cost Ext Price l Sp % Min ordr q-Wi Trmfr -- Cook 858 Subtatals —) -- - -- — -- 151902.34 23.0 21610 132747.40 197304.38 DEPTNO —> 2 (BEER) Cant 551 Subtotals—) - -- -- 50986.69 21.9 9196 49895.11 65301.53 DEPTNO - -) 3 (NINE) Count 791 Subtotals —) - - — 58380.71 33.9 15593 50055.33 88360.62 DEPTHO —> 5 (ICE) Count 3 Subtotals —) — — — -- DEPTHO —) 9 (REMTAL) mt 1 Subtatals —) -- -- +ttt+ PTNO —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS) .aunt 150 Subtatals —) -- — -- _- 2648.49 27.3 1538 2650.61 3642.96 DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER) Count I Subtotals —) — — -- -- tt+ ++ DEPTNO —) 91 (MISC LIQUM) Count 1 Subtatals —) — — — t + + ++ DEPTNO —) 92 MISC NINE) Count I Subtotals - -> ttt ++ DEPTMfJ —> 93 (MISC 6.5 %) Count 262 Subtotals - -> —_ 6738.41 31.7 4726 6732.65 9667.37 Count 2619 Totals --) ::veeav vvevssva.. xeevv at�uva 270656.64 25.7 52663 242081.10 364476.66 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - :980 TIDS JOHNSON, LEONARD G. AUGUST PAYMENT $812.76 < *> $812.76* 19 LI3.CONST GEHRKE, DAVID LIBRARY BOOKCASE $485.00 < *> $485.00* 1999 IMPR. CONST SRF CONSULTING GROUP WSB & ASSOC AIRPORT RENOVAT. MATHIOWETZ CONSTRUCTION PROFESS SERV -TH 15 $10,051.59 PROFESS SERV -2ND AVE BRIDGE $3,600.00 $13,651.59* AIRPORT PROJECT -THRU 6/26/99 $159,831.25 $159,B31.25* CAP.IMPRO.FUND KNOWLEDGE POINT SOFTWARE LICENSES, UPGRADE $3,249.00 $3,249.00* CENTRAL GARAGE B & B SPORTS PARTS, LABOR -77 LUND REPAIR $112.46 BRANDON TIRE CO TIRES $397.64 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $10.82 CROW RIVER AUTO PARTS, LABOR- POLICE 4 $171.63 DOYLE INCORPORATED REPLACEMENT FAN MOTOR $236.61 HOLT MOTORS INC CREDIT CORE $769.33 INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERIES $381.04 L & P SUPPLY CO BELT $203.78 MN BODY & EQUIPMENT FAN & BLADE $149.27 SCHRAMM IMPLEMENT CLEANER $67.03 STEPP MFG CO INC HEATER, HOLD DOWN $216.75 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO FUSES, SHRINK TERMINALS $133.42 VIKING SIGNS VINYL LOGOS ON TRUCK $420.00 < *> $3,269.78* GENERAL FUND AMERICAN BOTTLING CO, THE JULY POP $25.00 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL PROFESS SERV THRU 6/30/99 $429.11 • B & B SPORTS BARR ENGINEERING CO CARBUTETOR KIT PROFESS SERV - SURFACE WATER $15.14 $248.08 BAUMETZ, BONNIE REIMB- MILEAGE $55.49 BERGLUND, JAY UMPIRE $629.00 BERKLEY RISK SERVICES PROFESS CONSULT -JUNE, MILEAGE $1,442.60 BERNICKS PEPSI COLA POP PURCHASE $75.60 BLOCK, MARGIE REFUND -SR TOUR $10.00 BROWNS GREENHOUSE 4 PKS FLOWERS $200.13 BRY -AIR CONTROL RELAY $119.75 BRYGGER, SCOTT REFUND- CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $20.00 BUFFALO LAKE /HECTOR BOOSTERS DUNK TANK RENTAL $25.00 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS PATCH CORD $1,440.20 CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY COATED BOND, 20LB BOND $265.08 CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD INKJET CARTRIDGES $49.52 CENTRAL GARAGE JULY VEHICLE RENT $14,600.00 CENTURY LABS WEED KILLER, VULKEM 116 TUBE $112.83 CERES ENVIRONMENTAL HARDWOOD MULCH $914.74 CHIEF SUPPLY CORP BATTERIES $326.12 COAST TO COAST OPERATING SUPPLIES $97.38 COMM TRANSPORTATION LOAN PYMT $700.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CONNECT & OPERATIONS CHARGES $390.00 DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DNR FEES TO STATE $634.00 DEPT OF COMMERCE NOTARY RENEWAL -JEAN GRAY $240.00 DESIGNERS UNLIMITED COUNCL RETREAT & EXPENSES $512.40 DISPLAY SALES EXECUTIVE ALUM POLE 35' $1,165.33 DOMINO'S PIZZA PIZZAS, POP $45.55 DOOLEY CONSTRUCTION LABOR, MATERIALS- REMODEL $329.55 DORIVAL, SHARON REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $22.00 DRAHOS, ROBERT REPURCHASE CEMETERY LOTS $320.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM JULY SERVICE $3,9.41 ESS BROTHERS & SONS ADJ RINGS $889.35 EVESLAGE, JOE HOURS WORKED $31.50 FASTENAL COMPANY REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $312.03 FERNANDEZ, CHERYL REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $40.00 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS $38.34 GARCIA, JESUS REFUND DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 GEHRKE, LEROY CHAPEL -SPRAY TEXTURE $175.00 • / �q -'�, OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT ------------------------------------------------ GENERAL FUND GRINA, LISA GROEHLER, FLOYD • GRUFRUFF DESIGN HALI -BRITE INC HANKE, MICHELLE HARRIS COMPANIES HAUGEN, MARV HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP HEMMAH, LLOYD HENRYS FOODS INC HENSEN, MARK _ HILARY, KRISTIN HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE HUTCHINSON MOTORSFORTS HUTCHINSON UTILITIES JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT JEFF'S ELECTRIC JOES SPORT SHOP KRISHNAMOORTHI, CHITRA - L & P SUPPLY CO LUND, SHERRY M R SIGN MANKATO MOBILE RADIO MCKAY, KAREN MCLEOD COOP POWER MCLEOD COUNTY CHAPTER MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER MEMINDEX MID -MN HOT MIX INC MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. MILLER, DIANE MILLER, MARVIN MINI BIFF MISTY & FRIENDS MOBILE ZOO MITCHELL, WILLIAM -_ MN ELEVATOR INC. - - -- MN SAFETY COUNCIL • MN U C FUND MODERN MAZDA MOON, DOLF MURPHY GRANITE CARVING NACKERUD, NANCY NO STATES SUPPLY INC OLSONS LOCKSMITH PANKAKE, GARY PERFORMANCE COMPUTER FORMS PETERSON BUS SERVICE PLOTZ, GARY D. QUADE ELECTRIC R & R EXCAVATING RADISSON HOTEL PLAZA RECREONICS REDING, PEGGY RUTZ PLBG & HTG SAFETY LEAGUE SALLY DISTRIBUTORS SANDEEN, NANCY SCHRADER, JEFF SCHROEDER, KYLE SCHWANS SALES ENTERPRISES INC SCHWEIZER, JAN SEWING BASKET SHOPKO SIMONSON LUMBER CO SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY STANDARD PRINTING SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS SUSSNER, DION SWANSON, MARILYN TELECKY, MATT TWO WAY COMM INC UHL CO. UNITED BLDG CENTERS 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 2 REIMB -POST IT'S, FILE FLAGS $23.51 REIMB - MILEAGE, PARKING $49.00 T- SHIRTS $184.25 LAMPS $217.48 REFUND - CANCELLED BALLET DANCE $13.00 MAY SERVICE MAINT INSPECT $499.00 REFUND - CANCELLED SKATE LESSONS $15.00 CHLORINE, LY- STABILIZER $581.90 UMPIRE GAMES $221.00 CREDIT STIR STICK $1,071.51 REIMS- MEALS, MILEAGE, LODGING $652.98 REFUND - CANCELLED GYMNASTICS $28.00 TOWELS, TISSUE, CLEANERS $1,385.47 EXTING RECHARGE $16.93 PHYSICAL -VASKO $337.50 1999 PERA AID $39,856.50 TORO WORK MASTER RENTAL $275.00 BUBLS $17,914.49 - 870 CAP W /SLING SWIVEL $1,056.66 MATERIALS, LABOR- AIRPORT $1,696.59 PLAQUE $45.00 REIMB - MILEAGE, EXPENSES $50.53 PLUG $357.46 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $40.00 SIGNS $667.29 RAPID CHARGER, SPRING CLIP $77.85 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $20.00 JUNE UTILITY $384.22 LIFEGUARD BOOKS, CPR BOOKS $223.00 J KEPLER /VARIANCE APPLIC $538.50 WALL PLANNERS $141.39 FINES $237.48 JULY CELL PHONE $1,134.01 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $22.00 UMPIRE GAMES $102.00 UNIT RENTAL- ARMORY $79.88 TOUR $244.00 UMPIRE GAMES $398.00 JUNE ELEVATOR SERVICE $73.65 REG- BRENDA EWING, JO RUNKE $170.00 QTR 2 PAYMENT $124.94 VEHICLE TOW $17.04 REIMB- PARKING /LMC CONFERENCE $19.26 MEMORIAL CARVING $123.00 REFUND- CANCELLED GYMNASTICS $13.00 HOSE $33.75 KEYS $5.59 UMPIRE GAMES $285.00 PAPER $96.83 JUNE COACHES $589.55 REIMB -MEALS $16.00 BALLASTS, WIRE NUTS $209.20 INSTALL HYDRANT -NORTH JC PARK $600.00 INC HOUSING $2,037.95 PADDED HAND BARS $130.12 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $22.00 MATERIALS, LABOR -AC REPAIR $183.00 UNIFORM $144.85 TICKETS, PRIZES $72.30 REFUND - CANCEL MUSIC & RHYTHM $20.00 UMPIRE GAMES $170.00 MILEAGE $40.92 SCHWAN'S PURCHASE REFUND - CANCEL MUSIC & RHYTHM $ $55.93 10.00 UNIFORM REPAIR $122.02 HUGGIES PULL UPS $100.85 STORAGE SHED $399.38 EQUIPMENT RENTAL $55.92 CREDIT /RETURN KEYBOARD DRAWER $468.33 COFFEE $144.77 UMPIRE GAMES $102.00 REIMB - VIDEOTAPES FOR COUNCIL $12.72 REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS $60.00 MOTOROLA CELL PHONE $4,114.88 MATERIALS, LABOR -CITY CENTER $1,631.98 BRACING MATERIAL, TRTD PINE $252.20 F_ L_ J OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 3 _____________________________________________________________________ GENERAL FUND US OFFICE PRODUCTS _______________________________ REPORT COVERS $12.41 • WAL -MART WINZER CORP CALCULATOR, BUG SPRAY OPERATING SUPPLIES $227.19 $284.52 WISCHNACK, JULIE REIMB- INSTANT CAMERA FILM $12.77 WITTE SOD 33 YARDS SOD $29.70 XEROX COPIER LEASE $908.75 ZILLMER, RICK UMPIRE GAMES $255.00 < *> $112,352.88* HUTCH COMM DEV.0 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. JULY CELL PHONE - $18.75 < *> - $18.75* .:TCH TRANS FAC. HILLYARD FLOOR CARE /HUTCHINSON HAND CLEANER $14.53 KLEESPIE LABOR, MILEAGE, SUPPLIES $192.46 L & P SUPPLY CO COVER $18.05 QUADE ELECTRIC MATERIALS, LABOR -HATS BLDG $768.72 SCHMELING OIL CO FUEL $7,703.35 SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $35.63 < *> $8,732.74* LIQUOR STORE BELLBOY CORP JULY MISC $2,591.66 BUFFALO CREEK ENTERPRISES BLOODY MARY SEASONING $59.52 C & L DISTRIBUTING JULY BEER $50,512.90 CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD CALCULATOR $95.84 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. JULY LIQUOR $5,411.44 GRIGGS & COOPER TOBACCO DIV JUNE MISC $191.72 GRIGGS COOPER & CO JUNE LIQUOR $24,580.04 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE JULY BEER $2,806.50 HUTCHINSON WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP RODEO SPONSORSHIP $150.00 INSURANCE P LANNE RS LIABILITY RENEWAL $6,883.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. JULY LIQUOR $14,817.63 JORDON BEVERAGE INC. JULY BEER $2,283.65 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC JULY BEER $10,186.60 LOCHER BROS INC JULY BEER $37,128.40 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. JULY CELL PHONE $0.32 MMBA 1999 -2000 DUES $550.00 PAUSTIS & SONS JULY WINE $183.00 • QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE $2,413.27 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE DIRECTORY ADVERTISING $249.00 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY JULY BEER $99.30 < *> $161,194.28* PUBLIC SITES MCLEOD COOP POWER JUNE 1999 ELEC HOOKUPS $7,200.00 RYAN COMPANY REFUND -PARK & PLGD -PAID TWICE $11,809.80 < *> $19,009.80* SCDP 97 Hsg Reh HOLMQUIST LUMBER ROOF, WINDOW, DUCT WORK $6,885.31 <*> $6,885.31* TAX INCREMENT AUGUSTA BUILDING CORP JUNE SETTLEMENT $24,024.90 PRINCE OF PEACE SENIOR APT. IN JUNE SETTLEMENT $11,044.60 < *> $35,069.50* WATER /SEWER FUND AAGARD WEST TANK & CART PICKUP $1,921.50 AM.WATER WORKS ASSN REG- RICHARD NAGY $150.00 AM.WELDING SUPPLIES OPERATING SUPPLIES $16.99 BENNETT OFFICE SUP. METER READINGS $15.00 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS LABOR $45.00 CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD CALCULATOR, PROTECTOR $13.42 CONVEYOR DESIGN CONSULTING, MILEAGE $4,514.24 CULLIGAN WATER COND SOFTNER RENTAL $49.20 DEVRIES, RANDY REIMB -MEALS $48.17 DYNA SYSTEMS HDWE $200.34 EARTH TECH /RUST PROFESS SERV- COMPOST FACILITY $66,131.41 ELECTRIC PUMP /WALDOR GROUP ROTO FLOAT, LABOR, MILEAGE $789.80 FASTENAL COMPANY MACH LIFE EYE $63.59 FISHER SCIENTIFIC LAB SUPPLIES $148.05 FLO- AMERICA EXCHANGE TANKS $205.00 GOPHER STATE INC JUNE CALLS $164.50 F_ L_ J OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 4 WATER /SEWER FUND HACH COMPANY LAB SUPPLIES $2D6.08 HENRY & ASSOCIATES HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER VALVE BOX RISER PHYSICAL- BURMEISTER $64.97 $112.50 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES JUNE UTILITY $363.26 IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES UNIT RENTAL- COMPOST SITE $54.05 INDUSTRIAL MAINT SUPPLIES BITS $38.39 JEFF'S ELECTRIC MATERIALS, LABOR -WWTP $61.90 LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORP SHAFT MOUNT REDUCER $6,999.00 MCKIMM MILK TRANSIT INC MOVE BOXES 1 & 2 $90.00 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. JULY CELL PHONE $31.76 MN VALLEY TESTING LAB WATER TESTS $232.00 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. CORROSION INHI $3,964.98 NCL LAB SUPPLIES $441.90 PRAIRIE COUNTRY RC & D COUNCIL PROFESS SERV -JOHN MADOLE $1,435.50 QUADE ELECTRIC LAMP HOLDER $2.08 RADISSON HOTEL PLAZA LMC HOUSING $253.72 SCHMELING OIL CO RYKON MV $69.86 SERV -O -CAL MATERIALS, LABOR, MILEAGE -WWTP $385.00 SMITH & LOVELESS RETROFIT /PARTS $8,221.80 STAR TRIBUNE INVIT TO BID - 7/4/99 $369.34 TWO WAY COMM INC CASE REPLACEMENT $50.00 USA WASTE SERVICES INC LANDFILL LOADS 7/1 - 7/16 $5,678.52 WAL -MART BLEACH $14.57 WELCOME NEIGHBOR JUNE LISTING $60.00 ZD JOURNALS SUBSCRIPTION $49.00 < $103,726.39+ WIRE TRANSFERS .A.T.S. FUND FIN DEPT OF REVENUE -JUNE FUEL TAX ATER /SEWER FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX ENERAL FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX (ARENA) • 177R$I96 ADDITIONAL WIRE PRANSFERS T* CITY STAFF A BANK CWFKXAL S FR06t N= NEReeu,FftAMZ DRLCTDR SIAICT: ALMWV RETRANSFER Tte lobloiq M1de need to be wied - Y�Or.t payrtrmb oemm Cher NYC ABA 1021-000.02110 credit to so=" of Cede B Co. cro TFIE DEPOSITORY TRUST CO6PANY IN DNWmtd Deptelt Almaai N 055- 020778 OBI FIELD - PA 30317950 (1) 1990A G. O Medical FmdMMs 1996A O. O Taxable Medical Fau3flse 1990 knbru mnam Sonde 1991 Im"mmtsa Bonds 1992 krRlaaeme d Bonds 19951 m mmraaK Sable 1994 kmbi ove melt sonde 1995I.."a,etn s Saba 19968 Gmerm r, A FIATS 199e Ynpouer11m4 Bantle 1997 kmmvwnmt Saba 1 me kmrtwwnmd gabs (1) Ir1Wem of $90,076.75 will be vied ken Flreet 90X7173 1] 58,006.00 10X70.00 17,307.50 27,31123 7!X10.73 07,110.03 00.178.76 3390! 73 70,430.73 40=75 52,177.08 440,77021 440.77021 670443M The folbwig funds need m be wietl - PRMQPAL Patwrca Chase NYC ABA 0 021-000-021 to credit to somnt Of Code & Co. Uo THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY 1m 11e4nplbn DePUei Aaount a 066-027-306 O& FIELD - PA 50317950 1998A G. O Taxable Meacal FedlOw 15.000.00 16X00 00 2,09$X00.00 WIRl FROM FRSTAR $628,251.53* 476.00 6,991.00 2,154.00 (FAX of bab doa,ment must be made at some are Na oacpal polomme) IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 1 __ -___ ----------- - - - - -- __------ __________ - _----- _ - - -_ -- CAP.IMPRO.FUND HUTCHINSON YOUTH HOCKEY ASSC. PER AGREEMENT $191,500.00 < *> $1911500.00* CORAL GARAGE GENERAL FUND HOSPITAL BONDS LIQUOR STORE PAYROLL FUND 0 FIRST CHOICE REPAIR AAGARD WEST CHILD'S PLAY THEATRE DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES FOREPAUGHS HUTCHINSON TEL CO MN TWINS MPCA MRPA US POSTAL SERVICE FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA INSTALL SHORT BLOCK JULY PAPER RECYCLE 40 TICKETS RUMPELSTILTSKIN DNR FEES TO STATE SR TOUR -45 GUESTS JULY SERVICE 56 TICKETS STORM WATER PERMIT FEE MN LYNX 7/23/99 28 TICKETS POSTAGE FOR COMM NEED SURVEY INTEREST PAYMENT CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN PAYROLL 7/16/99 LEO'S TRANSFER - JUNE & JULY FREIGHT QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR PURCHASE WEGNER,NEIL REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE, EXPENSES AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 H.R.L.A.P.R. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST EE CONTRIB 7/1D/99 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE MANDATORY CHILD SUPPORT PERA LIFE INS CO. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 PERA- D.C.P. EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 PRUDENTIAL EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 TEMPLETON INC EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 WADELL & REED EE CONTRIB 7/10/99 WATER /SEWER FUND AAGARD WEST MINNCOMM PAGING NAGY, RICHARD c *> JULY SERVICE JULY SERVICE TRAVEL EXPENSE $2,000.92 $2,000.92* $1,528.61 $195.00 $776.00 $553.50 $1,087.14 R 168.00 240.00 196.00 $995.50 $5,739.75* $220,453.43 $220,453.43* $8,156.77 $1,119.94 $3,755.88 $75.05 $13,107.64* $690.00 $54.30 $100.00 $177.74 $2,651.15 $169.35 $126.00 $52.02 $75.00 $30.00 $17,821.62 $250.00 $150.00 $22,347.18* $264.99 $24.25 $1,272.47 $1,561.71* $456,710.63* E EMPLOYEE SAFETY COMI HTTEE HIINUTES: NNE I7 1999 PRESENT: Brad Emans, Radny Starke, Mark Wies, Mark Larson, Dave Telecky May Minutes were approved • Police department will be making the employee safety badges in July • Picnic will be at 12 noon in August — Bring your alternate along • There will be a training meeting from 8:30a.m. — 10:30a.m. July 10 titled"How'd they Do That — Los Control Workshop • Discussion of shorts worn for part time employee's. Safety commtittee is not in favor of this. Also Steel toe boots ' • There will be a loader certification class before the end of the year for all operators of this piece of equipment • Everyone is using Respond for their first Aid supplier • NEXT MEETING JULY 19 KUM MESSNER IS TAKER OF THE MINUTES • RECEIVED II II 2 01999 CITY OF HU I Qmir4soN July 16, 1999 Hon. Marlin Torgerson Mayor of Hutchinson Hutchinson Cary Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Torgersm Municipal services am sometimes controversial and there are those who are not supportive of municipal capital improvement projects. Occasionally however, we Ww those services, and the people who provide them, for granted without appreciating what they mean to us. I am enclosing for the council's review a copy of an article which appeared in the Wall Street Journal of June 18, 1999 which outlines whet happens in communities that don't have, for example, adequate fresh water supplies. With warm personal regards and best wishes for continned m=ess, I remain 1105 Jorgenson Hutchinson, MN 55350 320 587 7049 651 297 1007 W gba@hut net • = 3mmmm g �' ag E: N Ng� � 3a�BoA p�AN���mo3A���,�A (� s•� e b ^— a o-a rf 7a�C, a — V, G- ra nmAap'��E 2, ..'�� C � � 'Jm `�ip Fr. wEp+aE s o r-' ,»o ww m r �. °»� E w P C /}� a'n. ♦ "+-.'V mF'B, N w�� �"C�• ^��Sgw a. ,���•.' lV ✓ �. �. oo�m•�� a��� ���`�°�w5o3 N ` n gxgo g £ �., m ar�a'q.d. y w fi S� n_ w��t %%%%4SSS i d a H' g w m i° N A I F p7 I � `G'O G a,w 35 ,� o a '�• om•e '+ gJC' p"'f ° ic r" 5CaR E ` °�Fn"'a.F'^v amr • FL N Nestle Aims to Sell Bottled Water in Developing Nations Continued From Page Bl made its debut In Pakistan late last year and will soon go to Brazil, with megamarkets like India and China under consideration. The launch of Pure Life raises delicate issues about the business of selling water In developing countries, at a time when an estimated one billion people lack access to basic water services. In Pakistan, that has tragic consequences: 40`Y, of deaths of chil- dren below the age of five here are caused by waterborne diseases. "Nestle steps In and fills a need, but rums water into a luxury," says Peter Gleick, direc- tor of the Pacific Institute, a think tank based in Oakland, Calif. Others worry that the ar- rival of private- sector products fake Pure Life could encourage governments to curtail fur- ther investments in water Infrastructure. Nestle already has stirred controversy in the developing world, with allegations that it engages in overly aggressive tac- tics to market its powdered baby formula. "We don't want Nestle going In and saying to women, 'Bottled water is safe,' to dis- suade them from breast- feeding," says Patty Rundell, a campaigner at Baby Milk Action, an activist group In Cambridge, England. Nestle says It strictly adheres to World Health — nization marketing guidelines on bttst�rnWa. There Is no evidence in Pakist, t , fosuggestthatNestleisusingPure Life to cross- market baby formula. Peter Brabeck, Nestle's chief execu- tive, says Pure Life Isn't intended to be "a solution" to the world's water problems. He says the idea sprang partly from his expe- rience living in Latin America where "the water tasted terrible." 'I said, 'Why not create a product that fulfills basic needs like taste, safety and high mineral content, but which is made lo- cally to reduce costs?'" he recalls. So far, Pakistanis are reaching for Pure Life in record numbers. After six months, the brand has taken over 503b of the coun- try's small bottled -water market of 33 mil- lion liters (35 million quarts) a year, accord- ing to Nestle. Pure Life is everywhere—at roadside stalls, gas stations and rest slops. It's hawked at street corners in traffic - clogged Lahore. Middle -class shoppers buy it by the case In supermarkets. On the re- mote mountain road leading from Islam- abad to the hill town of Murree, Pure Life billboards urge drivers to "drive only Nes- tle Pure Life." At small stores along the way, a flurry of banners proclaim: "Pure Safety, Pure Trust. The ideal water. From Nestle with love." The potential is enormouo-_ Currently, per capita consumption of bortied water in developing countries like India and Pak - Istan Is less than half a liter a year, co r pared with 111 liters in Fran( nd 45life in the U.S., according to Euromonitor, a market research company. And with the once -strong European market now flat, the fastest - growing markets for bottled water are developing countries like India, where volume nearly quintupled between 1993 and 1997. Nestle has about 16% of the global market for bottled water, concen- trated mainly In Europe and the U.S., but only 1% in Asia. Still, making Pure Life a global block- buster won't be easy, even for a marketing machine like Nestle. local competitors In Pakistan are already scrambling to protect their turf. Nestle's main rival, France's Damon SA, the world's No. 2 water com- pany and owner of the Evian brand, is eye - Ing emerging markets, too.Nestle's Pure Life marketing strategy stumbled at first Two months before its launch, Nestle asked Its Lahore ad agency, Interflow Communi- cations Ltd., to raise public awareness of waterhygiene issues, which resulted In a se- ries of "awareness seminars." Pakistani health'officials appeared, saying that urban water supplies were contaminated and that even 14 bottled waters were tainted, accord- ing to tests by the country's environmental agency. Nestle's name wasn't mentioned. But a spokesman said the company soon grew un- P happy with the "tone" of the seminars and asked Interfiow to discontinue lherr;. "We didn't want to be perceived as stirring ul controversy, although what Was said by UP officials was factually correct and no planted by Nestle," explains Francois Per rood, the Nestle spokesman in Switzerland. Mr. Perroud acknowledges that medii coverage of the seminars helped Pure life though he maintains that Nestle didn't vin late ethical marketing standards. Still, hr says the company won't repeat the semi nars in other launch countries. Regardless, the seminars leave a No taste In the mouths of some Pakistanis. "These foreign companies are misleading the people to make money," charges Mw hammed Amin, managing director of the Lahore Water Supply Company, after learning of the seminars. He says the local wst ^r is basically good when it is pumped out, but •, •- ety pipes and leaking sewage deg,,: y '.y the time it comes out of the tap. That's why water bills carry a warning to customers to broil it be- fore drinking, Mr. Amin says. Pure Life won't reach everyone in Pak- istan, where the per capita annual income is roughly $495. "The fact that everybody can't afford Pure Life is unfortunate, but does that mean we shouldn't sell it at all?" asks Hans - Dieter Karischeuer, director of Paris -based Perrier-Vlttel SA 's wa- ter division. "We can't than world. We can onlytry toimproveita le."