The URL can be used to link to this page

cp10-12-1999 c0 OCTOBER SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 1999 - lo- -11- -12- 7:00 a.m. - Leadership Team HUTCHINSON All City Offices Open Meeting in City Center CITY Main Conf Room CALENDAR 9:00 a.m. - Directors' Retreat at Emergency Operations Center 5:15 p.m. - Light Traffic Advisory WEEK OF Conf. Board Meeting in Main Con a.m. -First Aid Training at Room Fire Station October 10 -16 4:00 p.m. - BUDGET WORKSHOP 2000 in Main Conference Room 5:30 p.m. - City Council Meeting in Council Chambers WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY -13- -14- -15- -16- CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/ 10:00 a.m. - Safety Committee 7:00 a.m. - HCDC Board of TRAINING/VACATION Meeting in Main Conf. Directors Meeting in Main Room Conference Room 10 -12 Neil Wegner (C) 1:00 p.m. - First Aid Training at 14 -15 Brad Emans (C) Fire Station 10/14 -11/30 John Rodeberg (V) 7:00 p.m. - Hutchinson Community Needs Task C - Conference M = Meeting Force Meeting in City S = Seminar Center Council Chambers T = Training V = Vacation AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1999 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION —Rev. Don Urbach, Our Savior's Lutheran Church 3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 28, 1999 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MINUTES OF AUGUST 27, 1999 2. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 1999 3. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 1999 4. POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 5, 1999 • 5. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 2, 1999 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 99-264 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 735, ADOPTED APRIL 8,1986; AMENDMENTS RELATED TO MONUMENTS AND MARKERS IN THE CITY'S CEMETERY (SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11329 - RESOLUTION FOR AUTHORIZATION OF SENIOR CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENT 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11330 —RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING GARBAGE RATES (c) DANCE PERMIT FOR JOSE A. PALACIOS ON OCTOBER 23, 1999 WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (d) PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 25 -29, 1999 AS MINNESOTA MANUFACTURERS WEEK (e) CONTRACTS FOR AIRPORT PHASE H DEVELOPMENT ♦ CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR TERMINAL REVISIONS ♦ TESTING SERVICES WITH AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING (f) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 FOR LETTING NOMPROJECT NO. 98 -18 • (HOSPITAL PARKING LOTS): CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 12, 1999 ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11331 - DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11332 - RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036, LETTING NO. 9/PROJECT NO. 98 -18 ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11333 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036, LETTING NO. 9/PROJECT NO. 98 -18 NINE VO WS Ig •3131 Rm •► Y 3 1. LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY EARL OLSON LOCATED ON 1125 CHEYENNE STREET SW WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS 2. LOT SPLITS REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER ON THE FOLLOWING WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ➢ 901 & 903 HILLCREST ROAD NE ➢ 907 & 909 HILLCREST ROAD NE 3. LOT SPLIT AND VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE FROM 35% TO 39% LOCATED AT 825 & 827 HILLCREST ROAD NE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11334) 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY TO CHANGE USE TO HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY AND MATERIALS RECOVERY CENTER LOCATED AT 1065 FIFTH AVENUE SE (SOLITRA BUILDING) IN I -2 DISTRICT (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11335) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY REX ERICKSON FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 50' X 30' GARAGE LOCATED AT 590 PETERSON CIRCLE NE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11336) 6. PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT SUBMIT'T'ED BY PAUL BETKER FOR WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PLAT 2 WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11337) REZONING REQUESTED BY GREAT PLAINS DEVELOPMENT TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R -1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) TO R -2 (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE - 1 & 2 FAMILY) LOCATED EAST OF LAKEWOOD DRIVE SW AND NORTH OF SOUTH GRADE ROAD WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11338) 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — OCTOBER 12, 1999 REZONING REQUESTED BY CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO REZONE PROPERTY FROM R -2 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE — 1 & 2 FAMILY) TO I -2 (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMPOST FACILITY LOCATED ALONG HWY. 22 SOUTH (TABLED TO OCTOBER 19, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING) 9. AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BARRY BARTON FOR CONTINUED CONSTRUCTION ON STORAGE UNITS LOCATED ON 407 SCHOOL ROAD NORTH WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WITH CHANGES IN CONDITIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11339) 10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY PAXTON ANDERSON TO CONSTRUCT MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING (5 -PLEX) LOCATED AT 851 DALE STREET SW IN R -3 DISTRICT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11340) Action — Motion to approve consent agenda PUBLIC HEARING (a) TAX RATE INCREASE FOR 1999 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2000 • Action — Motion to close hearing — Motion to adopt Resolution No. 11341 6. COMMUNICATIONS, BEQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) DISCUSSION OF REPORT ON 1999 ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SYSTEM FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT BY DIRECTOR RANDY DEVRIES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and certify report 7. NONE (a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING WORKSHOP DATE FOR 2000 BUDGET REVIEW Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (b) CONSIDERATION OF ADVERTISING FOR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTANT FOR LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve l_J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — OCTOBER 12, 1999 (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION TO WAIVE ALL BUILDING PERMIT FEES AND VARIANCE FEES RELATING TO UTILITIES BUILDING ADDITION AND RENOVATION Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (d) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO GRANT AGREEEMENT NO. 78956 FOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION WITH MN/DOT OFFICE OF AERONAUTICS Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve agreement and adopt Resolution No. 11342 (e) CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR HUNTER'S RIDGE SECOND ADDITION Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (f) CONSIDERATION OF SUBDMSION AGREEMENT FOR WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PLAT 2 0 Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve F F 9 N WX XTUX / (a) COMMUNICATIONS 1 : lu ' Ti] ; Y Ell 1 ► : 1Z I 1 j, /ul Di ce (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 1 � J:►UI 0 V MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1949 Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jeff Haag, John Mlinar, Kay Peterson and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering John Rodeberg, and City Attorney Marc A. Sebora. 2. The Reverend Greg Nelson gave the invocation. FT 11,1 lr0 The minutes of the regular meeting of September 14, 1999 and bid openings of September 15, 1999 and September 23, 1999 were approved as presented. (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 17, 1999 2. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 30, 1999 3. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES OF AUGUST 17, 1999 4. FINANCIAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATES INVESTMENT REPORT FOR AUGUST 1999 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES RESOLUTION NO. 11325 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LOCATION OF THE POLLING PLACE FOR ALL CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 PRECINCTS AND APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE 1999 CITY AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 ELECTION 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11326 — RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE FOR 1999 ADOPTED ASSESSMENT ROLLS 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11327 — ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY 4. RESOLUTION NO. 11328 — RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 17/PROJECT NO. 99 -40, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5035 (c) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR DICK NAGY TO ATTEND REGIONAL MEETING IN MILWAUKEE, WI FROM NOVEMBER 11 -13, 1999 (d) PROCLAMATION DECLARING OCTOBER 23, 1999 AS "MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIFE OF A YOUTH" 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 Motion by Peterson, second by Erickson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion unanim ously carried. 511 15 it C ► • •ulu 11up : 0 1110 zi X • 1 .►I Y �► (a) Y2K UPDATE BY POLICE CHIEF Steve Madson gave an update on what the City is doing to comply with Y2K issues. He reported the City was in good shape for compliance by 2000. There was a glitch in the water system, but it will be rectified by next month. Contingency plans are in place, but they are not anticipating any problems. The electricity and gas have been tested and are ready for 2000. 1►Iylo &I - 134 1 la X`jWd6RIy (a) CONSIDERATION OF NEW CITY GARBAGE RATES Ken Merrill reported on the two recent City garbage rate increases. The Town Board of Rich Valley, McLeod County, imposed a $2.50 per ton Mixed Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Fee on the Spruce Ridge landfill, and they are passing on the fee to the City, effective August 18, 1999. In addition, the MSW rate at the Spruce Ridge Resource Management Facility will be $45.00 per ton plus taxes and fees, effective September 18, 1999. Merrill showed a graph that compared how these refuse rates would affect 30, 60 and 90 gallon containers. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haag, to approve the garbage rate adjustments. Motion unanimously carved. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR COMMUNITY/ CONFERENCE CENTER Plotz reported the City received three proposals and an offer from KSA Architects, Inc. to design the building. The McLeod County Agricultural Association presented a conceptual site plan and expressed a willingness on the part of the Fair Board to work with the City to explore possible options. He stated Karkela Construction Incorporated presented a one -page proposal that contained a letter of intent to pursue financial funding for the $1 million match. The letter contained 10 items of the minimum requirements in the RFP. The proposal from the Greater Minnesota Family Services contained an alternative approach and a drawing for part of the facility to be used by a health group within the community center. The City Administrator stated it was difficult to compare the proposals since they 0 K 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 were all different. The purpose of advertising for a Request for Proposals was to see what options were available in the private sector. He suggested to continue the dialogue with the three entities that submitted a minim proposal and to give them further consideration. Haag commented that the Council could leave the RFP open continue dialogue with the three private sector bidders, and look at other alternatives available. He noted that other people in the community were looking at some options. The Mayor stated that although the proposals did not meet the RFP requirement, he thought the Council should continue dialogue with the bidders and research other options. Steve Cook, Chair of the Community Needs Task Force, commented that the Task Force was looking at other needs for the facility. The research would probably take until the end of the year to complete the study. He reported on the responses in the survey regarding the community/conference center and questioned the amount of conference space available for meetings and banquets. Cook stated that 94% of the survey respondents thought the residents should vote on major new City facilities and 91 % felt the public should have a say on issues. Mike Ribich, member of the Community Needs Task Force, thought the people should have public input and be allowed to vote on an expensive project. He stated it was a question of whether the taxpayer should or should not have a right to vote on a major facility. He requested the Council to commit to letting the residents vote on a Conference Center proposal prior to the November City election and asked the City Council to adopt a resolution to this effect at tonight's meeting. A representative of the American Fitness Centers stated he was willing to meet with the other bidders in order to expand the family and teen services available and to make use of the S 1 million match. He noted that a match from his company would not be taxpayer money. (c) DISCUSSION OF COUNTY ENGINEER PROVIDING ENGINEERING SERVICES TO CITY FROM OCTOBER 14 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 1999 Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve option one of a lump sum fee of $3,000.00 for County engineering services during the penod of October 14, 1999 through November 30, 1999 when the Director of Engineering will be on a six -week sabbatical. Motion unanimously carried. 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 (d) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO REQUEST PROPOSALS FOR JOB EVALUATION AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM Brenda Ewing, Human Resources Coordinator, updated the Council on the process of soliciting proposals for professional services for the development and implementation of a job evaluation and compensation system that meets all Federal and State Compensation Standards. She noted it had been 16 years since it was modified in 1984. Ewing will send out a request for proposals and bring the responses to the City Council for consideration. Motion by Peterson, second by Erickson, to approve the Request for Proposals. Motion unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM CROW RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TO WAIVE BUILDING PERMIT FEES AND PLUMBING PERMIT FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSE LOCATED AT 619 LYNN ROAD Motion by Haag, second by Erickson, to approve waiving the building permit fee of 5653.95 and plumbing permit fee of 5445.00. Motion unanim ously carried. 0 (f) DISCUSSION OF SOUTHEAST AREA TRUNK SANITARY SEWER Rodeberg requested approval of two contracts for the work on the proposed trunk sanitary sewer improvements to extend the wastewater treatment facility to the TH 15 South commercial area. He reported Earth Tech was completing Phase I of the project, which included the lift, station, force main and river crossing (up to Jefferson Street). The Director of Engineering informed the Council that SEH -RCM would do the Phase 2 engineering services (Jefferson Street to TH 15 south) and Hacker's Appraisal Services would provide acquisition services. The first public information meeting on this project would be held October 12, 1999 with both consultants in attendance. The cost would be as follows: ♦ SEH -RCM — Feasibility Report 57,282.00 Est. Fee Preparation of EAW 55,000.00 to $8,000.00 ♦ Hacker's Appraisal Services —Acquisition Services Flat Fee of $550.00 Per Parcel (Additional fees might be required) Motion by Erickson, second by Mlinar, to approve the Engineer's recommendations. Motion unanimously carried. • 4 . CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 (g) DISCUSSION OF TH 15 NORTH SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION AND RELATED ANNEXATION Rodeberg reported that Larry Graf had requested annexation of the North American Broadcasting Company's property (KDUZ/KKJR) which is outside the City limits. They have experienced continual water problems and believe the only option is to become annexed into the City and hooked up to the City sewer services. The City Engineer requested authorization to complete a feasibility report that would detail the issues and costs to provide sanitary sewer service to this property. Upon inquiry, it was reported that public meetings would be held regarding the annexation, and other property owners in the area would be given the opportunity to annex into the City. Motion by Mlinar, second by Erickson, to approve a feasibility report. Motion unanimously carried. (h) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO CITY'S CEMETERY RULES AND . REGULATIONS It was requested to approve amendments to the City's cemetery niles and regulations that address circumstances related to the placement, size, and impact that monuments have at the cemetery. Motion by Haag, second by Peterson, to approve the amendments and to waive first reading of Ordinance No. 99 -264 and set second reading for October 12, 1999. Motion unanimously carried. (i) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR SALE OF LOGS AND WOOD Motion by Erickson, second by Peterson, to approve and award the bid to Shirley and Duane Otto in the amount of $200.00. Motion unanimously carried. (j) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FOR TWO CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: 1. PURCHASE OF TWO MATERNAL/FETAL MONITORS 534,403.00 2. PURCHASE OF SPACE LABS/ 5,600.00 CARDIAC MONITOR 17.700.00 • Motion by Haag, second by Peterson, to approve the two capital expenditure requests. Motion unanimously carried. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 (k) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED JOB DESCRIPTION IN PLANNING DEPARTMENT Motion by Mlinar, second by Haag, to approve the revised job description and to advertise. Motion unanimously carried. (1) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING DATE FOR BUDGET WORKSHOP 2000 Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson, to approve the date of October 12, 1999 at 4:00 p.m. for a budget workshop. Motion unanimously carried. (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY Sebora reported that Attorney Dan K. Prochnow had requested the Sorensen & Naustdal property (Rolling Meadows Subdivision) be changed from abstract property to registered property. He asked the Council to approve the Assent to Registration form. Motion by Haag, second by Mlinar, to approve the Assent to Registration. Motion unanim ously carried. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR REGARDING PUBLIC COMMUNICATION Erickson stated he wanted to go on record in regard to the community survey that was recently done. He noted that one comme;a he got out of the survey was that close to 50% of the residents surveyed had little or no knowledge of City issues. Perhaps the City Council and staff needed to help the people become more familiar with City issues so that there would be more knowledge displayed in the decision - making process. The Mayor remarked that he would like to find a way to get information to the people. He thought the quarterly City Newsletter was not doing the job, and he would be open to any suggestions or ideas. Peterson commented that no process or system was in place to attempt to get the vote from the people on issues. Plotz inquired about the City newsletter and stated the cost involved to produce and print it was $2,500.00 per issue and $10,000.00 per year. • P . CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 The consensus of the Council was to try another approach to get information out to the public and to look at other alternatives besides the quarterly City newsletter. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR Plotz commented on the "Financing Hutchinson Growth" workshop held this afternoon. He elaborated on the six recommendations presented by Ehlers & Associates and suggested that the Council establish a Resource Allocation Committee that will make recommendations to the City Council. Motion by Mlinar. second by Peterson, to approve the appointments of the Planning Director, Finance Director and Director of Engineer to the committee. Motion unanimously carried. Following discussion. Mlinar amended the motion, second by Peterson, to include the EDA Director. HRA Director and City Administrator to the Resource Allocation Committee. Motion unanimously carried. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING • Rodeberg stated that since the HATS facility had been completed for some time, it was necessary to take action to dissolve the Construction Board that was appointed for the construction of the facility. He requested permission to dissolve said board. Motion by Erickson, second by Peterson, to approve dissolution of the Construction Board. Motion unanimously carried- The City Engineer updated the Council on the various street projects in progress. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM JOHN GILK Gilk reported to the Council that there was a problem with gas service to one of the houses in the Third Addition that will be ready for occupancy within a week. He stated the fees had been paid and the permits had been issued for the house. Rodeberg commented that the Utilities needed an easement through the Fourth Addition before Gilk could obtain gas service. He noted the City had requested a plat for the easement. Gilk questioned what would happen if the Fourth Addition was not platted. He stated • the utilities had made a 30 -foot error outside the easement. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 The Mayor directed the City Attorney to work with Gilk, the City Engineer and the Hutchinson Utilities to resolve the issue. (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson, to approve the claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. WINERV ITUT F RITU T RY l ►N There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 0 r 1 Hutchinson Community Development Corporation - an EDA Board of Commissioners Friday, August 27, 1999 7:00 a.m. at City Center Conference Room Minutes Board Members present are in bold print Don Walser Bob Windel Jeff Haag Jim Haugen Don Erickson Tim Ulrich Sheldon Nies Chamber Rep: Jon Block, Hutchinson Chamber of Commerce HCDC Staff: Christie Rock, Executive Director 1. Call to order... President Tim Ulrich The meeting was called to order by President Tim Ulrich at 7:10 a.m. 2. Approval of EDA Board of Commissioners minutes for July 23, 1999 A motion was made by Don Erickson to approve the minutes. Jim Haugen seconded the motion. Tim Ulrich asked for discussion. The motion was approved. 3. Approval of 2001 -2002 Budget Tim Ulrich explained that the three -year budget was presented to and approved by the Finance Team at its meeting on August 17. At that meeting, specific questions were answered regarding the staff. travel/schoollconference, and printing/publishing line items. Ken Merrill also addressed the EDA revenue sources, including the General Fund, tax levy, developers fees, TIF administrative funds, and rent. Christie Rock highlighted the staff line item for the Board's benefit. She explained that the line item includes funds for both the Executive Director position and for a part-time or shared program assistant. She indicated that she and HRA Director Jean Ward have considered sharing a staff person. The person would work 20 hours a week for the EDA and 20 hours a week for the HRA. Salary and benefits would be divided between the two agencies. Both Christie and Jean agree that this would be the most cost- effective way to hire a committed and competent employee. Christie and Jean are working on a job description. The staff person would be hired under the City's pay plan. A number of Board members had concerns about sharing a position between the HRA and EDA. Don Walser suggested that a part-time secretary was the only position needed. Christie indicated that she would like to have someone who can assist with more substantive projects, rather than a person to simply answer the phones and take minutes. She will prepare a cost - benefit analysis of a part-time vs. half -time position, she will also provide ajob description, and she will clarify salary and benefit information for the next meeting. A motion was made to approve the 2000 -2002 budget by Jim Haugen. Tim Ulrich . asked for further discussion. Don Erickson seconded the motion. The motion was approved. 4. One -Motion Agenda The July 1999 Financial report was reviewed. Christie highlighted the activities of the Industrial Park Task Force, the Finance Team, and the Planning and Operations Team. Christie also asked for comments regarding the letter to the Main Street business /property owners, the letter to local real estate companies. and the employment survey that will be distributed to Hutchinson's leading employers. Don Walser suggested that examples of eligible projects be included in the letter to the downtown business/property owners. He also noted a number of typos. Christie will make the changes prior to sending the letters out. Don Erickson made a motion to approve the one -motion agenda. Tim Ulrich asked for discussion. Don Walser seconded the motion. The motion was approved. 5. Administrative and Program Staff Update: Christie provided the group with a brief update of the activities she has been working on over the past month. She highlighted the Corridor Study, the Downtown Lighting Project, the emplovment survey, and the Target lunch. Christie also mentioned that she and Gene Goddard from DTED will be meeting with local manufacturers who employee over 30 people during the months of September and October. DAV Property: Christie told the group that Marc Sabora is still working on the option agreement for Dick McClure. She mentioned that Dick expects to build on the property sooner than originally expected. Hwy 22 Corridor Study: Tim and Christie told the group about Hwy 22 Corridor Study that recently got underway. A meeting between City, County, and MNDOT officials took place earlier in the month. The goal of the project is to determine appropriate and more definitive land uses for the land on either side of the new Hwy 22 bypass. At the first meeting, it was decided that a more manageable steering committee should be established to work with City staff. The steering committee will consist of one member from the Joint Planning Board, the City Council, the County Board, and the EDA. Tim Ulrich indicated that he would be willing to serve as the EDA representative. He asked for motion recommending his nomination. Don Walser made a motion to approve Tim Ulrich as the EDA representative. Tim asked for discussion. Don Erickson seconded the motion. The motion was approved. In addition, both Christie and Director of Planning and Zoning Julie Wischnack asked the • large group to consider placing a moratorium on development until after the study is completed sometime in January. The moratorium is not meant to prevent or impede development, it is meant to manage expected growth more effectively. Jim Haugen made a motion recommending that the County Board place a moratorium on development in the corridor until after the study is completed. Tim Ulrich asked for discussion. Don Erickson seconded the motion. The motion was approved. Christie will draft a letter to send to the County Board outlining the EDA Board's recommendation. 6. Other items Christie and Tim explained that two people have expressed an interest in joining the HCDC. Steve Jansick from Marquette Bank would like to be on the Finance Team, and Brad Jacobson from Marquette Bank would like to be on the Industrial Park Task Force. Both would replace existing members who represent Marquette Bank, but who no longer attend meetings. Don Walser made a motion to delete Tom Cover and Wendi Kruse from the membership list and to replace them with Steve Jansick and Brad Jacobson. Tim Ulrich asked for discussion. Don Erickson seconded the motion. The motion was approved. Annual membership meeting Christie asked the group to decide when and where they would like the annual membership meeting to be held. The group decided to have the meeting on November 10, at the Peace Center. The group also recommended a number of people for keynote speakers. Christie will ask someone from Crow River Press to do a presentation. 8. Chamber report Jon Block updated the HCDC on Chamber activities. He highlighted the Arts and Crafts Festival, the Blandin Leadership Program. the Chamber Leadership Program, Quality Council. Music in the Park and Vi's fountain project. Jon also talked about the Smart Choice — Select City article that Vi is working on. Next meeting The next meeting will be Friday, September 24. 1999, at 7:00 a.m. 10. Adjourn A motion was made and seconded to adjourn the meeting. Respectfully submitted Jim Haugen Secretary/Treasurer Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting Monday, September 27, 1999 Members Present: Richard Peterson, Paul Wright, Newton Potter, Connie Lambert, Mary Henke, and Lois Carlson Members Absent: Kay Peterson, Dolores Brunner, and Kay Johnson The August minutes were read and approved. Old Business: Since Sue Munz has resigned from the local board, Mary Henke announced we now have one vacancy on the local board and one on the Pioneerland Library System board. The names of Larry Ladd and Jan Crow were mentioned as being interested in participating on the board. After discussion, it was moved and seconded that recommendations of Larry Ladd for local library board and Jan Crow for the Pioneerland Library System board be sent to the Mayor contingent upon their consent. The board voted unanimously to purchase B banners with the words "Welcome to Hutchinson Public Library" and the Library Square logo designed by Julie Ingleman. A discussion was held about putting 2 planters by the Hassan Street entrance instead of trees on the apron in front of the entrance. Mary will look into this. Mary reported the Surf Watch software has been ordered. Hopefully, it will be up and ready soon. • New Business: Mary Henke gave a report on the budgets prepared for the city and Pioneerland Library System. Complete budget worksheets were distributed, showing requested city and county contributions. Mary read a report from Kay Johnson from the PLS meeting of September 16. Information included: 1. Madeline Bronson of Yellow Medicine Co. gave a recap of their library's services 2. An update of the Outreach Grant of $34,000 was given. Hutchinson received $500 from this grant for children's magazines. 3. Minnesota State Grant Report update -PLS receives $337,000. 4. Library service agreement was signed between PLS and Prairie Corrections Facilty in Appleton. 5. Minnesota Library Conference in Duluth Sept. 29 -Oct 1. Linda and Mary will attend. 6. Automation update - -7 libraries on line, 5 more by October. 7. Tour of newly remodeled Willmar Public Library. The next board meeting will be October 25, 1999 at 4:30 pm. Lois Carlson, Secretary 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON BUILDING / PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT L 31 HASSAN STRFET S.E.. HIJTCMNSON. MN 55750 PHONEL 612-2344316 FAX , 612-2344240 SeOtember 1999 NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELYOWNED PUBLICLY OWNED HOUSEKEEPING Item Nun*Wof valuation of Num of vawationa BUILDINGS No. &liwoga Houaing c0israwden rnwtrurom S+lainga Housing 1 Units Ormf and Unto Omit canna (a) igl (d) (d) Lai 11 Ig Singlarramry houeaa, dlaehad R.aar mebe.rwo. t01 6 6 1,039,000 Si gfs - family houses, attached sa.+•ew Rwea n,o,f salt +n �,.r .e..... e.r,.....,e 102 sdr q.rr.a eesr n ew. Tw tamwy otmaings 103 - Three -and four -family but 104 Fiveror-mare tsm11y Gmldl 05 q TOTAL Sum of 107 -10.7 109 in 14 11 aco nnn NEW RESDENTI.AL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED NONHOUSEKEEPING ham Nanbead Valuadonof I Nurnw of Valuaibnof BUILDINGS 7 NO. 17uddnga Ko0n1a ConavyCtgn Buildings Rgans com illuckn Omd cents pmt Dan's (a) 191 (a) Idl let 171 (a) Hodls, masts, and tourist cabYu (uansianl socmmwtlabwm or") 213 Omer nonixxmekaepng abetter 214 NEW PRIVATELY OWNED - PUBLICLY OWNED NONRESIDENTIAL Item Number Vahlalicn of Number d VeWaoan at BUILDINGS No- d rn+ahuWn Buildings even au - .. On* cam OmR oboes (a) (b) (c) Id) (a) Am.s t, social, and raa®edonal 318 churches and other rellgloye 319 Induslnal 320 Paming garages Icuadnes 6 oven deckarn 331 Samw stations, and repaif garages 322 Mandals nkl institutional 323 _ Offices. banks, and pmfalagnal 324 Ptbic egrka and utillbas 335 1 17.500 Schods a.d dm9 educatbnra 328 Snares enm cuslaner services 327 1 450.000 Other , orrasidential buildings 325 Structures odner Ryan buildings 329 AUUMON5. PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLYOWNED ALTERATIONS, Item Number vaiustkmd Number of Vmbsdnn0 AND CONVERSIONS No- of wautructal Buildings construction Buildings pnXasna Omit cones (a) (b) (c) (d) Ie1 Resitlntttsl. Cisa4fyedWdons of 434 garages and arbo of 0 Rem 430 13 170,995 Nonresg4nual and nonheusekeepieg 417 6 366,900 Addltiam of rasalmtal garages and 430 carperts (aR3dled and daleclleel DEMOLITIONS PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED AND RA7JNO Ilem Number I tAanbmol Numberon Number el OF BUILDINGS No. Of BuWRgs Hwang law Builds" Housing unma a) @ (c) Id1 (a) SkgWlainily houses (aeerhedW debmxdl 645 TWtrdmdy buildings 646_ Throe - and tour -family buddrge 447 F1Vecr-more family buiWkge 6119 AN other W4dn4s and structures 949 KKK -1S, KNK -t., LAU -), rtNLt -1, JKLYL -1, MML -Z. ]26N -b, IUTAL FLKMIIS 64 TOTAL_ VALUATION $2,506.155 TOTAL IN5P. 219 INDIVIDUAL PEFtWrS AU11114ORMG CONUMUCTION VALUED AT $5KODO OR MORE PIAaAA PatlA dw tdbwiM Wo. Wkxr for Ash Wq* meml q mmmmilon vMmd at WIXODO of rrrrrA aft N d do above Asdorr kwr NO hen aboa saodo,r W DASrpfm (b) 1Wr»0n4 ad*t of awrw w bumw (C) Owwahp AYra 0q err (U vwuom mmhucom Orne carat (al Numbw C M udh l0 (D) xa,d d CSK Ant Inc [] PdaY Q Prtld 11450,000 mtlA 1380 Hwy 155 Phoenix AZ KYtl tl brldp 0 PrMW 0 PubAe 11 IDndd mlerq 0 Pwvan 0 Polo 3 x> d d evaary 0 Prh r. O Pdlo 11 addaw Corrrww M you nary d Arty n WrnM - WK*V MWdCWM? 0 No 0 Yw • PNaaa Ow AdsbW HamAtlm in an ft NMrra d Pmon rc maed rapardnp daa ndorl TAYpwr N coda aa M nbw Ex%n mr TMa II I I II NO NEECE NECESSARY UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL IMTGAAA 1Ml .eAarm a a,cnrrAS.oArRn PWAW all ac PAW m ALOIIESM F. W. Doke wnr�n.ro..uu.r� Brddbg Swima PO Bw 609 L mgWK MA 024209536 IIIrrrr, I. I. I.,Irrl,lllrr,lrl,rrlrlrrrllrrl Irrllrrrl,lrrllrwl 0 C l HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES • The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on October 5, 1999, at the Hutchinson Police Department Present at the meeting were Cheryl Dooley, Bob Bowen, and Chief Steve Madson. The meeting was called to order. Steve Madson stated interviews were held for part time patrol officer positions. He stated that 10 people were interviewed in the processes. Madson presented the list to the commission for their approval. A motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to approve the part time patrol officer list as presented. Motion carried. Madson then informed the commission that there have been some changes in the state with regard to allowing lateral entries during a selection process. This change has come about due to the tight market for law enforcement. There are many officers that would be willing to apply with a different agency but does not want to start over at an entry-level position as a patrol officer. Madson stated that this trend started apprommatety three to four years ago in Minnesota and that White Bear Lake and St Paul have begun utilizing this process. He stated that he has been authorized by the city to allow lateral entries. The.testing process can not be bypassed with.a lateral entry. An officer must still go through the background, physical and psychological processes. It is used to attract individuals who are already licensed in law enforcement and currently working with another agency. Madson stated that the Hutchinson Police Department would need to begin looking. at establishing another eligibility roster before the end of the year. He anticipates that the current roster would be depleted before year -end. A motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to authorize the chief to begin the selection processes. Motion carried. With there being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to adjourn. Motion carried. Time of adjournment was 8:15 a.m. 'Rick Nass • MINUTES Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board September 2, 1999 Members present: Jay Beytien, Todd Ertsgaard, Deb Koglin, Bernie Miner, John Mlinar, Dolf Moon, Sonja Peterson, Richard Pettet, Brett Rasmussen, *¢rC Schiesl, Peggy Westlund. Mid Minutes dated August 5, 1999 were approved by Todd Ertsgaard and seconded by Deb Koglin. OLD BUSINESS Northwoods Park - Update for new members. HJLB provided good information at the neighborhood meeting. HJLB and BBA had their meeting about what to do in the future about field space. School facilities could be developed. Could add a 3"' field. BBA has meeting next week. Discussing borrowing $40,000 to make improvements at school campuses as a short -term fix. Would use money for safety fencing, better playing surface, portable fencing, etc. at Middle School fields. Community Survey - Results should be in this month. Hopefully committee will provide endorsement for new projects. Will share results when received. Summer Projects - 1) Arena- proceeding. Roof should be done by Friday. Having meeting today. Shell is up. Only 8 weeks left! 2) Basketball court done at VFW Park. 3) Parking lot done at Oddfellow's Park. 4) Football field at High School looking nice with new logo in center of field. 5) Connecticut Park playground equipment will be out before winter. Waiting for budget information to make decision about how much of the equipment will come out and what will replace it. NEW BUSINESS Welcome New Members - Rich Pettet, Brett Rasmussen, and Mike Schiesl were welcomed as new members. Theresa Sweeney will also be serving another term. 2'" Vice Chair Election - Will elect 2'" Vice Chair at October meeting. Current Chair is Peggy Westlund, 1 Vice Chair is Mark Cormier. Summer Wrap Up - Dolf shared program participation numbers from Summer 1999: Swimming Lessons - 1,375; T- Ball/BasebalUSoftball -352; Camps (BasketbalWolleybalUOutdoor Adventure)-224; Adult Softball -79 + HTI team; Special Events -516; Shelter Reservations -676; Pool Passes sold -437 (most sold); Fields used -1,660 (not including tournaments). Participation was strong. Peggy suggested putting numbers in Leader to show use. Old Arena scheduled to open October 3, New Arena scheduled to open November 7. Fall Program - Brochures sent out weekend of August 27'. • 1. School Age Childcare Survey - Survey will be sent out through Friday folders. Want to find out what need in community is for in- building childcare. Will take results to School Board. /1 -/�).- s MINUTES PRICE Advisory Board September 2, 1999 Page two 2. Middle Level Sports - 6'", 7 & 8 0 ' grades. Working with Todd Grins All registration and coaches (including wages) run through Community Education. Examples include: Volleyball- includes schedule, 2 color t -shirt, intramural game, Jamboree, Gopher Game, and 1 out of town trip. Basketball- intramural game, outside competition, t shirt, cost $75. 3. Brochure - Lots of registrations! Budget Parlor & Recreation - Have not received rough draft yet. Council will make decision on budget September 15'". Will be no large fee increases for year 2000. Hope to have numbers at October meeting. BMX Track/Skateboard Park - Dolf has talked with Tim Lobeck, looked at sight, cost estimates, pictures, and video. We have the equipment, people power, and construction materials to build. Would be usage of 5-6 months/year. Questions raised - safety, security, liability, stag fees, supervisor, events, upkeep. Climbing Wall - McLeod County Trail Association looking at using funds from Spruce Ridge Land Fill, approximately $20,000, to build climbing wall at Park Elementary New Gym Proposal was sent to school's Facility Committee to review. Results should be in by November. BOARD MEMBER ITEMS I. John Mlinar mentioned that Willmar has a task force developing a possible Aquatic Center. Money is being raised, soil borings are done, architects are at work. Facility will be similar to Chaska. $3 million proposal with public funds. Will be on ballot in November. 2. Family activities are main concern for community. Hutchinson residents want more. HMS pool is working out well for lessons. We need an attraction - oriented facility. Survey will find out what community's priorities are. After the survey results are in, PRCE board could approach City Council, make recommendation, go to voters. 0 PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 99 -264 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 735. ADOPTED APRIL 8,1986; AMENDMENTS RELATED TO MONUMENTS AND MARKE IN THE CITY'S CEMETERY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: Section 1. In the interest of clarifying language related to the placement of monuments and markers in the cemetery, the City of Hutchinson hereby amends the ordinance. 1. Paragraph #17 -1 SIZE OF MONUMENTS Monuments or their foundations shall not encroach into the space required for interment of a full -size burial vault, which generallymeasures eight feet, six inches by forty -two inches. 2. Paragraph #17 -G; FLUSH MARKERS In areas designated for interment of cremations, only flush markers are allowed. Only one marker is allowed in each lot, and markers shall not exceed a maximum size of twelve inches by twenty-four inches. 3. Paragraph #17 -L; MONUMENT AND MARKER AREAS OF CEMETERY Large monuments, unusually shaped or oversized monuments, personal columbaria, or private mausoleums may be allowed in areas of the cemetery where adequate space may be purchased. Each request for monuments and markers not complying with regulations herein shall be reviewed independently with regard to required space and appropriate fit of the monument or marker. Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this day of 1 1999. ATTEST: Marlin Torgerson, Mayor Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator i ;1 • RESOLUTION 11329 AUTHORIZATION OF SENIOR CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, the following properties be certified as deferred for hardship for senior citizen or disabled person as outlined by state statute, city ordinance, and city resolutions: Property description Lot 1 Block 2 Selchow Jorgenson Subdivision 1 Ac. of W 1 /1 NE % NW 1/ Section 12- 116 -30 r1 L� Owner Leola Karl Pearly & Genevieve Christensen THAT, the following assessment roll shall be deferred under the above guidelines: City Roll Number 5027 5029 Amount $3,988.00 $15,625.00 Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of October 1999. Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Administrator CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 11330 ESTABLISHING GARBAGE RATES is BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THAT THE FOLLOWING MONTHLY GARBAGE RATES ARE ESTABLISHED Senior Citizens Rate Every Other Week Gallonage Container Size 30 60 90 Standard Service 13.78 17.74 23.70 Std. Service with Valet 17.29 21.25 27.21 3.51 (with weekly valet) Senior Citizens Rate Every Other Week 10.68 Every other Week w/ Valet 14.19 With Income Qualifications the following: Senior Citizens Reduced Rate 2.50 Senior citizens with reduced rate 6.01 (with weekly valet) Senior citizens reduced rate 4.26 (with bi weekly valet) Adopted by the City Council thisl2th day of October 1999 Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTESTED: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT Rr-CENED • �UG�bI999 FEE $50.00 CITY GF t1UTCMWSON 1. Name of Applicant Address 7 ?. Organization Address 3. Location & Time 4. Date of Dance - — - -`% i 6. Name of Band / / 7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? Elsewhere? Sig6=re of Applicant 8 Recommendation of Chisf--Qf Police: �� X 12 wk w t"� a 10. Action of City Council: Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired (S32/Hr.) *: *(Payable in Advance) • 6/99 ,4 -' Minnesota Manufacturers Week Whereas: Manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector in Minnesota. Providing S16 billion in 1996 wages, and Whereas: Manufacturing produces S27.1 billion for the state economy and is the second largest sinme share (18.9%) of our gross product and Whereas: Manufacturing exports brought nearly S9.53 billion into the Minnesota economy in 1997, and Whereas: Manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs which significantly contribute to Minnesocis high standard of living and economic vitality, and Whereas: Manufacturing contributed nearly 5216 million in corporate income taxes in Minnesota, more than any other business sector, and almost 28 percent of total corporate income taxes in 1998; i m so f �1 r 3y� Now Therefore, I Marlin Toreerson — Mayorof the City of Hutchinson Minnesota. do hereby proclaim the week of October 25 -29, to be Minnesota Manufacturers Week In WitnessWhereof. I have hereunto set my hand and nosed the Great Seal of the City of Hutchinson Minnesota to be affixed it the City Office this Twenry -fifth day of October. One Thousand nine hundred and ninery- ninery. c a T >e y Mayor City Administrator )t' — D° * E%S T A C 0 Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hu n Street SE Hutchinson. MN 553542522 320-597-515t/Fn 320.234 -4290 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Airport — Phase 2 Development Contracts: Change Order No. 2 for Terminal Revisions Testing Services with American Engineering Testing DATE: October 7, 1999 Attached are the above two referenced agreements. I believe that the Council previously approved is the Testing Services Contract in May, but it apparently is not noted in the Council minutes. The Change Order at the Airport Terminal involve minor revisions, the largest of which is a $1,511 addition to meet requirements due to review by the State Electrical Inspector regarding zone separation. The total Change Order No. 2 is $2,025. We recommend approval of both agreements. cc: Gary Plotz— City Administrator John Olson —Assistant Public works Director file: Airport 1999 f 1 i Pnmed an recycled pryer - CHANCE ORDER Chance Order No. '_ Airport Hutchinson Municipal I I I Hassan St. SE Hutchinson MN 55350 TKDA .A.P Comm. No. 11253 -02 SAP. 430414 Sponsor Sponsor's Address Date Prepared Amount of Contract Is Hutchinson I I I Hassan St. SE Municipal Airport Hutchinson, MN 55350 924/99 Contractor Contractor's Address Completion Dates Gopher State 340 SE 1" Avenue Contract Revised: Contractors,. Inc. Rice, MN 56367 5 Months 5 Months + 3 days CHANGES ORDERED I. After the project was bid, a barrier stair was required by the State Electrical Inspector to separate areas with different use classification zones. The Contractor proposes to install this barrier at a cost of $1,511.00. 2. The location of the underground storage tank from the hangar floor - drains was moved due to utility conflicts. Less depth for burial was available in the new location, so 4" polystyrene insulation will be installed over the tank for frost protection at a cost of $254.00. 3. Due to the nature of the pre-engineered building design, a different concrete foundation detail was necessary. The additional forming and concrete placement was completed at a cost of $260.00. 4. After the project was bid, the State Department of Health required an additional vent for the water softener drain. This work was completed at no extra cost to the project. 5. The Contractor requested a time extension of 3 -days for the additional work described above. No cost change is associated with this time extension. All of the above changes in the work, cost. and time of completion were developed in accordance with project specifications. The total cost of Change Order No. 2 is the sum of the above. or $2.025.00. The foregoing is in accordance with your contract dated . 3/26/99 and the aforementioned change. and the work affected thereby is subject to all contract stipulations and covenants. CITY OF HUTCHINSON an Title Date ACCEPTED: GOPHER STATE CONTRACTORS, INC. Bv Contractor e Date TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON & ASSOC, INC EN %fIV S)ARCRPTECTS- PLANNERS Y Senio4 Project Engine Date APPROVED: MnDOT AERONAUTICS Rv Regional Airport Engineer Date 0 1 , 11 u L.J 0 ro Hutchinson Citv Center III Ha Street SE Hutchinson. h1N 55350.2522 320- 587.5151/Fux 320.2344240 J _ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Contract for Airport Phase 2 Testing Services DATE: May 5, 1999 We have solicited bids for testing services from the following companies. Company Estimate American Engineering Testing $15,195 Braun Intertec $21,995 GME Consultants $23,780 Construction Engineering Lab. $28,164 Maxim Technologies, Inc. $30,865 TKDA is currently reviewing the low two bids for compliance with the testing requested. Unless there is some unforeseen issue that arises, we recommend awarding the contract to American Engineering Testing in the amount of $15,195. The estimated construction testing cost included in the budget was $20,000. cc: Gary Plotz —City Administrator Lyle Kratzke — TKDA John Olson — Assistant Public Works Director file: Airport —Phase 2 Printed on recycled Paper' ;/_2�_:7 RESOLUTION NO. 11331 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 LETTING NO. 9/PROJECT NO. 98 -18 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Hutchinson Area Health Center (HospltaVMedical Center Site) by reconstruction of parking lot by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base and surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $294,337.74 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $70,641.06 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $364,978.80. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $364,978.80. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the • adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of October 1999. Mayor City Administrator • a Ah Akk COMPILED BY: C. RI ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 mw LETTING NO. 9 /PROJECT NO. 9A 19 I hadurm Area I leallb Center (I Iorpital /Medial Curler Site) sw Rccmtatruclion of Parking Lot by construction of Stonn Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Concrete Curb & Gutter, Bituminous Base & Surfacing & Appurtenances 10112199 ADOPTED COMPUTED BY: C. RICE __ G T1 e J. 0.OUPIIEA CI II'A K Il V 1998 BOND FUND — C41% IN'1'P:RESI RA IT. ISI I IRG WAIVED 6/23/98 10 NUMBER OF YEARS 2ND HRG WAIVED 6/21/98 $91,144.70 COST PER UNIT ACCOUNT NO. CFIY PIU NO. NAME & ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT UTILITY /STREET ASSESSMENT DEFERRED ASSESSMENT TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 01 07- 116 - 2904-0010 CITY OF HUTCHINSON - I IAHC 1091 HWY 15 5 HUfCI IINSON AREA I IF.ALTIf CENTER All, THAT PART OF LOTS 16 & 18 I I I HASSAN ST SE N OF EXTENSION OF CENTURY HUTCHINSON MN 55350 AVE, AUD PLAT' LOT 15, AUD. CC: HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CENTE PLAT SECTION 711&29 ATIN: PHIL GRAVES 1091 HWY 155 23.224.0130 HUTCHINSON MN 55750 1.00 $91,244.70 SOAP S91,244.70 02 07- 11629 -04-0020 CITY OF HUTCHINSON -HAHC 1093 HWY Is I IUI CI IINSON AREA 1117 AIAII CENT FR PART OF LOTS 16 & Ia N 01' III I IASSAN ST SE - EX F.NSION UP CEN I CRY AVE. I IU'ICI IINSON MN 55350 AUD. PLAT LOT 15 At 11). PLAT' CC: HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTI I CEN'IE SECTION 7 -11629 ATTN: PHLL GRAVES 1091 HWY 15S 23.244.0140 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 1.00 $91 ,244.70 50.00 S91,244 70 03 07- 11619 -44-0030 CITY OF HU'I'CI IINSON - HAHC 1093 HWY 15 5 IP-H (All NSON AREA I IFACH I CENTER PART OF LOTS 16 &18 N OI' 111 HASSAN ST SE EXTENSION OF CENTURY AVE HUTCHINSON MIN 55350 AUD, PLAT LOT 15 AUD PLAT CC: IIU'L'CHINSON AREA HEALTH CENTE SECTION 7- 116-29 ATTN: PHI. GRAVES 1091 HWY 15S 21224.0150 IIUTCHINSON MN 55350 1.00 $91,244.70 $0.00 591,244.70 04 0711629.04.0040 CI'IYOFIIU'iCHINSON -HAHC 10971IWY 15 I IU'ICI IINSON ARIA 11EAl.111 CI.N'I'ER PART OF I (YIN' 16 & Ia N OF III I IASSAN S'I SF, EX'H -NSION OI" CFN'I'URY AVE I IU'ICHINSON MN 55350 AUD. PLAT LOT' 15, AUD. PLAT CC: HUTCHINSON AREA IIEALIIT CENTE SECTION 7 -I 1629 ATTN: PHIL GRAVES 10911 IWY 15S 23.224.0160 HUTCHINSON MN 55350 1.00 $91,244.70 $0.00 $91,244.70 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 $364,978.80 M W3SPAGE 1 W 1 RESOLUTION NO. 11332 RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 LETTING NO. 9 /PROJECT NO. 98 -18 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 12th day of October, 1999, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of Hutchinson Area Heafth Center (HospitaVMedical Center Site) by reconstruction of parking lot by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base and surfacing and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The owner /owners of the affected properties have waived hearing on said proposed assessment. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest • accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 1999. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of October, 1999. Mayor City Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. 11333 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5036 LETTING NO. 9 /PROJECT NO. 98 -18 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of Hutchinson Area Health Center (Hospital /Medical Center Site) by reconstruction of parking lot by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base and surfacing and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.41 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 1999, until the 31 st day of December, 2000. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 1999; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of October, 1999. Mayor City Administrator '4Z - /- 0 Hutchinson Citv Center 111 Hr n Shod SE Hutchia n. MN 55350.7522 320. 587- 5151/Fa 320.2744240 I MEMORANDUM DATE: October 5, 1999 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT SUBMITTED BY EARL OLSON LOCATED ON 1125 CHEYENNE STREET S.W. The Planning Commission approved the lot split with the following condition: 1. The applicant may cover no more than 35% of the lot with structures, decks, or porches. cc: Earl Olson, 765 Wagner St. SW, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Pnn e o �wied paper - 9 � • w 4 �s ts�om °;acoo � p� con oo�o �a ee ee � 0000 � lld!�00 Q� 2 RVEY =1GHTS OR •1069.3 \% ea c, Block 6. Ld Lq UI N EARL OLSON V .7 \ 67 1 1 0� eej 1128 LLJ I I Z t0 — — Z e LLJ 7.10 x x 4" N89 201 WTI: ebs to Garage Garage ee o e PROPOSED HOUSE t0 PROPOSED HOUSE F It e NOMERLY PARCEL. I .1 k r - -- r 49.6 63; palN pelt tb uNh M N � 2 LN t. era 4 PLAZA ttWrF3 0 SOUn*XY PARCEL. eS7 I � or I and u"" se"m^t 10 xo" Me x e7.e re I — — (6SFO I—L x e2� el: tie N88 188.01 a r W e7 a U I ee .7 7.1 Ian Or al 11C 67.6 x?U EabtYq Fb,ne y direct teed DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL State of That part of Lot 2, Block 6, PLAZA HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of a One described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of sold Lot 2: thence northerly, along the east line of sold Lot 2 a distance of 49.01 feet to the beginning of sold Oro*: 0. iy3z9 thence westerly, parallel with the south One of sold Lot 2 to the westerly line of said Lot 2 and sold line there terminating. HUTCHINSON MN JOB NO. 99165 t reLt DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL That part of Lot 2, Black 6, FLAZX 111190M, eltaeeettitQ to the recorded plat thereof, bbo n Its westerly prokinal" T Commencing at the se lilloo t thence nonherb, along tllte 111 %ft 911 sdA1'b81� distance of 49.01 to the beginning of sold line: thence westerly, parallel with the South One of sold Lot 2 to the westerly line of sold Lot 2 and sold One there terminating. nx a_yu or. i1 N 67.01 Caen ".a Boon :. I LLJ I I Z t0 — — Z e LLJ 7.10 x x 4" N89 201 WTI: ebs to Garage Garage ee o e PROPOSED HOUSE t0 PROPOSED HOUSE F It e NOMERLY PARCEL. I .1 k r - -- r 49.6 63; palN pelt tb uNh M N � 2 LN t. era 4 PLAZA ttWrF3 0 SOUn*XY PARCEL. eS7 I � or I and u"" se"m^t 10 xo" Me x e7.e re I — — (6SFO I—L x e2� el: tie N88 188.01 a r W e7 a U I ee .7 7.1 Ian Or al 11C 67.6 x?U EabtYq Fb,ne y direct teed DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL State of That part of Lot 2, Block 6, PLAZA HEIGHTS, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of a One described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of sold Lot 2: thence northerly, along the east line of sold Lot 2 a distance of 49.01 feet to the beginning of sold Oro*: 0. iy3z9 thence westerly, parallel with the south One of sold Lot 2 to the westerly line of said Lot 2 and sold line there terminating. HUTCHINSON MN JOB NO. 99165 t reLt DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL That part of Lot 2, Black 6, FLAZX 111190M, eltaeeettitQ to the recorded plat thereof, bbo n Its westerly prokinal" T Commencing at the se lilloo t thence nonherb, along tllte 111 %ft 911 sdA1'b81� distance of 49.01 to the beginning of sold line: thence westerly, parallel with the South One of sold Lot 2 to the westerly line of sold Lot 2 and sold One there terminating. nx a_yu or. i1 C E Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Ha n Street SE Hutchinson. NN 55350-2522 120.587- 5151/Fu 320-214 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 5, 1999 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLITS ON 901 AND 903 HILLCREST ROAD AND ALSO 907 AND 909 HILLCREST ROAD N.E.SUBMITTED BY PAUL BETKER. 0 The Planning Commission approved the lot splits. cc: Paul Betker, 37 Monroe St SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350 C J Pnmd . rt 6 d paper - BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY FOR BETKER BUILDERS v LOT 21 BLOCK 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 1077.3 DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL The North 40.00 feet of Lot 2, Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the I recorded plat thereof. so Im m eat Isar c 4. Id Ian air , air ect .te :late of 25F3ZS • a Ln W J J on 76.1 1 1 76.01 DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL Lot 2, Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, except the North 40.00 feet of sold Lot 2. X X 719 73.9 70.7 1 1 77.9 S90 IM52 ' _ _ — — 713 77.9 29.3 e"+7 e v e O d ze 8 ti PROPOSED HOUSE Garage l I 25{0 • I I 8 = Garage r 24 � I 717 117 I e 13.7 17.7 O lD 74.3 PROPOSED HOUSE O ID 14 gels^ BM basin 717 S90b0'00'E 205.04 � I 761 y I 715 7100 " 75.4 Eslsnng Houss 91657 X HUTCHINSON MN JOB NO. 99065 BK P - ,&V�PG 5 ra3 Z Tao \ Drainage and Uw11117 easement - W w I X lax 1 W N 1 c I 11 D A X 70.2 7a4 I 1 1 70.9 BK P - ,&V�PG 5 i ♦ i • > 1 ! i 4j • 1 • 1 7 1 12 11 N f t 14 ti 1! t N 1 • pOml Nt 16 2j j 1 1 1 i 7 4 1t ti i • T i • tt 11 t0 • • mo11 a>i� wE 6 * 7 t 1 1 Z s t ! 3 Z 1 AR li 7 1 • • 7 1 1 12 1 1 7 1 1 s T R -4� E:A , Z4N!i ! 1 a gar �r � +� a AMC A"m } 1 7 1 1 s T R -4� E:A , Z4N!i ! 1 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY FOR BETKER BUILDERS LOT I BLOCK 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES , �h PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION - 1078.5 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR 1070.8 x % x x Neu: P nee a LO Net Isle 71.9 a 12.0 ur 75.e0 7dl 75.6 a 12.0 fool Dratnoge ° Nlt7 x 70.1 easement "g fawn of ena odtowng the . e1 Lot I. n north 76.. BM 70.0 75.9 S90 e W�00 e E I SIMI7 mz — - hydr 75.3 x74.0 72.9 - - -x MIS 60 — t 2T.33— . °_.l 712 — — — — —`. et g r 75.3 25.67 � % 1 s a Garage PROPOSED HOUSE x 73 to 4 QO 9 I ()t r of 75.65 W 70.0 75.7 715 2 0 1 x y� p ti 69.6 t W I O 73.1 N Garage PROPOSED HOUSE � a 6 I n �{ O and U / I r 2 ti 12 I 7dI 7d0 9 i ''e w r J L_ x — — — x73.2 — — — — — — —e = m 7..e 75. 70.1 S90 " 1.�. ..�2 73.2 T0.0 Mn Tao t I t i t Plan or my direct I 719 71. x 75 x75'5 x 7ne� need DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL State of The North 40.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof.. DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL Lot I, Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, except the North 40.00 feet of Said Lot 1. Na. 27/.� HUTCHINSON MN JOB N0, 99064 BK P -237 PG I a ! • 1 1 ! a • 12 it I w 1 • 1• u is t, ,• • a lug I1bow wt 1 �s 2 J * . 1 s a s • • fan11 +•[ � 6 7 it 1 1 = s t ! 3 f 7 = 1 1 AK R 7 • 1 f 1 12 1 111-1 ►� �Al ril 7 s R -4 1 d.i ra 7 . AMW F m pm Ic MR Ila 1p ►� �Al ril 7 s R -4 1 d.i ra Will. City of Hutchinson, 111 Hassan St SE, Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 12.01(5), Subdivision Ordinance No. 466 D Filed: / rtv Owner(s): ) ! n'lO A SO r\. .5 L a M. � it Address: // i `t�CA /n So! Telephone: > a - — a Q.2 Present Address of Propert Present Legal Description: �0.00 Residential' — (p4p� ial Copy of Deed or Copy of Front Page of Abstract Submitted Split: As osvner(s) of the above described propem I I we do hereby request the City of Hutchinson to approve the following split. Parcel A: Parcel B: Zero Lot Line Firewall: Yes No _ If no. explain: Separate Water & Sewer Services/Easements: Yes No _ If no. explain: 40 sment Search is required at a cost of 517.50. If assessments are on existing propem, I request the assessments be sphtas follows: ❑ Acre 7 Front Foot ❑ Square Foot 7 Percentage: % to Parcel A _% to Parcel B Assessments have been or swill be paid in full by applicant prior to recording. - (All assessments splits must be approved by Director of Engineering and Finance Director.) Signature: Q-k Signature: NOTE: A Registered Land Survey identifying the lot split and the two resulting lots shall be submitted with this request. All existing structures and setbacks from property lines, easements, adjacent streets and right -of -ways shall be identified on the survev. The split of this property will not become final until the City has received notification from the McLeod County Recorder's) Office that said split has been recorded. Recording of said split shall be the responsibility of the owner. SAC & WAC Fee: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Easements to be vacated? Yes No City PID Existing Lot: ' i \- 111 --L '`l — �A -- t Assessment Address Assignment of New ley PID of New Lot: APPROVED BY: zoning OIL PUsaisstoll. (dated 6 Impaled by zoning oiNddhiry ettelaeerl County PID Existing Lot: County PID of New Lot: Planning (due) City Callow: IV O 15 30 60 scale In feat BENCHMARK Top nut of hydrant near NW corner of Lot I. Block 4. Elevation • 1078.97 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY FOR BETKER BUILDERS LOT 1, BLOCK 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES • Denoias "n monument found O Denotes iron monument set rj O 1 A 1 hereby car,lty ,hat ,hls Survey, Flag or Roller, yea er.same or M of Yreer " direct agervlr lee and 'he' .11 w • Ball it, I. d Loge Sur vdyer ur1er tke "lore •1 rh• eIP• •1 Mln unr a. J111011119, Is lo pet. LI.. No.Zyjv� .NEN LAND SURVEYING x Denotes existing elevation I I Denotes proposed elevation PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION • 107 &5 PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR • 1070.8 Y NNe: hop„ee heuu h 1.0 l4 M 71A ]1e0 10.1 ]ie a lie Mt pm apa vr a Rly aauwem Ilene uM N ord aeteavre lea I n M el ... 1. ].ae BM im rip S90s00'00 180. 17 I _ $ r 713 zs.o 9 d Garage 0 IX PROPOSED HOUSE 8 - 270 N N I Geroge PROPOSED HOUSE U.1 r J q r s J 12 I 70.1 10.o tl _�y.1� L � — = 7e.e 75.641 724 ee.6 b 16 CP {{ TT p0.0 7e.1 S90 195.52 11= I 71e na N x 733 Y Y DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL The North 40.00 /eat of Lot I. Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof. DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL Lot I. Black 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof. except the North 40.00 feet of said Lot I. HUTCHINSON MN JO NO. 99064 6A6 r BK P -237 PG I� I x T11 7o.e� Hutchinson Citv Center 0 DATE: October 6. 1999 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson DIN 55350.3522 _20.587- 5151/Fax 320-234 -4240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: Pursuant to Section 6.04, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is herebv submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request fora variance. HISTORY On august 18. 1999. Paul Betker submitted applications for an after- the -fact variance for exceeding the maximum lot coverage by 3% and a lot split (Lot 6). FT\DINGS OF FACT The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 23. 19$9. TT t e proposed lot split is in conformance with requirements. 1. These units are presently under construction. At the time the building review was conducted, it was not identified that these structures cover 38% of the lot. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the lot split and also recommends approval of :ne :'S lot coverage variance based on the unique size of the lot and its location next to a wetland area with :he following condition: The lot may not add any more structure to increase the lot coverage. Respectfully submitted. William Arndt. Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Paul Betker. 27 Monroe St. SE. Hutchinson. MN 55350 • -G Publication No 6059 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, Septembers 999 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street. Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151. ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at City Hall on Tuesdav, October 5, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Paul Betker, property owner. 825 & 827 Hillcrest Road NE, is requesting a variance to increase lot coverage to construct a two family residence from 35% to 39% located at the above address. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: ] Dui hff�W�° WA SIY9R5 n � �a m>Hm° wurKir A • ♦ ♦ V ♦ y A ] 1s 8 x 8 9 LRAB 9 �t bl YJ 3 I / u 9 '� �♦ +o n p r I r] o I i N , / OIUYf Nf fndkan Lo Wn of Pmp" � All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 5. 1999. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal. you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. F City Adrdmistrato September 23, 1999 Date • 11 BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY FOR BETKER BUILDERS BLOCK. I, ` ALNUT RIDGE. w t, PROPOSO'GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION • 1076.0 7 y; (No Basement) r2a2 vt Y y , I FL n ,W.: cc U t .,. PELLINEN j. Cy 77.11 11114 7s.z g r t 74,e 73.51 �y 761 K �. j 'r•I • �G , :.1'+ * 761 :��'.,':. _'yS`��f�•.. 140.00 70.3 70.0 77 ti +le va ti 4 t 74.0 7a7 118 v f` N 7.67 PROPOSED HC+�ISE m 15 1 14 741 p d O \ \ Gorape , S ` � S • /l Is' D 714 i x Tar F , 73 r = / X 7a2 m Garage PROPOSED HO(f � p ` t I Y: 10 g 1 14 74.6 c 73.3 ' d St 73.8 12 L_ 7a B a I4 1 4 6 ¢ r r ._ ___. � mo d � m 1 % /' 70.. 7a7 S9WW 14a0b 74.1 / DESCRIPTION OF NORTHERLY PARCEL The North 40.00 feet of Lot 6,.@lock 4, / Tae WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to >?� N 0 IS 30 60 stole In feel BENCHMARK Top nut of 4ydrenl near the northwest caner of Lot 6, Block 4. Elevation • 1076.87 x the recorded plat thereof. , 73.6 7ZL2 0 Denotes iron mo7lWnent found DESCRIPTION OF SOUTHERLY PARCEL O Donates Irorf monument set Lot 6. Block 4, WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, I Denotes eAlsfing eleyugon except the North 40.00 feet of sold Lot 6. l ) Denotes prgpose4 elevation I hereby certify that this Survey, Plan or Report was prepered by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor Under the laws of the State of Minnesota. l t� Lit. No.l�� Detc: 7 •+1S � -- ! IG H UTCH IN SO N MN i JOB NO. 9913 _ _ UK P 2 31._ 37 I LOT SPLIT APPLICATION City of Hutchinson, 111 Hama St SE, Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 12.01(5), Subdivision Ordinance No. 466 gate Filed: /V /994 Property Ors ner(s): d e 7Kf l Address: 3 7 /VA o 1-1 fb t° C Telephone: C 300, S¢'?^ - 4 / ' �;6 Present Address of Property: Present Legal Description: Copy of Deed S� s g ,2 c -e 5L Gc/.o- C Copy of Front Page of Abstract Submitted c F_tfaft' Split: As owner(s) of the above described properry I / we do hereby request the City of Hutchinson to approve the following split: Parcel A Parcel B: Zero Lot Line Firewall: Yes No _ If no. explain: Separate Water & Sewer Services /Easements: Yes No _ If no. explain: Assessment Search is required at a cost of 517.50. If assessments are on existing properry. I request the assessments be split as follows: 7 Acre :1 Front Foot ❑ Square Foot 7 Percentage: 0 . to Parcel A 1% to Parcel B 2KAssessments have been or will be paid in full by applicant prior to recording. (AH assessments splits must be approved by Director of Engineering and Finance Director.) Signature: 42' ,MO� Signature: NOTE; A Registered Land Survey identifying the lot split and the two resulting lots shall be submitted with this request. All existing structures and setbacks from property lines, easements, adjacent streets and right -of -ways shall be identified on the survey. The split of this property will not become final until the City has received notification from the McLeod County Recorder's Office that said split has been recorded. Recording of said split shall be the responsibility of the owner. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SAC & WAC Fee: Easements to be vacated? Yes No City PID Existing Lot: I 1 1�) Z — d� c ` County PID Existing Lot: Assessment Address Assignment of New Citv PID of New Lot: County PID of New APPROVED BY: Zoatatl Off. Plaaaing Staff. PlammatComa: Clty Coam : (dated & leldnied by maw o(neLUelty taxlaeto (daft) (daft) ' X,550.00 Resi , u � } : S L TO¢pUl'€dl L C rs y —G -3 RESOLUTION NO. 11334 RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT SPLIT AND A 3% LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR PAUL BETKER LOCATED AT 825 AND 827 HILLCREST ROAD NORTHEAST BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. ,VIN: FINDINGS 1. Paul Betker. owner of 825 and 827 Hillcrest Road Northeast made application to the City Council for a Lot Split under Section 12.20 and a Variance from the lot coverage requirements under Section 6.04. 2. The City Code requires that the maximum ground coverage for a building (principal and accessory) is 35 %. 3. The applicant proposed a lot coverage of 38 %: thus requiring a variance of 3 %. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6. Block 4.. WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The North 40 feet of Lot 6. Block 4. WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES according to the recorded plat thereof and Lot 6, Block 4. WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof except the North 40.00 feet of said Lot 6. is 4. The City Council has considered the recotrunendation of the Planning Commission and the variance hardship criteria and found that the variance request has the following hardships: unique size of lot (lot depth) and a wetland area to the east of the lot. The City Council further considers. the structures were allowed a building permit for the structure, which did not identify the lot coverage as being an issue. 6. The City Council found the lot split to be in compliance with the subdivision requirements of the City Code. CONCLUSION The City Council approves the lot split and the variance with the following condition: .Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of October. 1999. ATTEST: • Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor Hutchinson Citv Center 11 DATE: October 6, 1999 111 Hm Strt SE Hutchinson. itN 55350 -2522 320.5 87- 5 1 5 11Fe 320. 230.4240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY AND MATERIALS RECOVERY CENTER FOR MCLEOD COUNTY AT 1065 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTHEAST Pursuant to Section 6.04, of Zoning rdinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On August 18. 1999. McLeod County, applicant and Solitra U.S.A. Inc.. owners, submitted an application for a conditional use permit. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 23. 1999 3. The conditional use permit meets the review criteria. 4. The proposed use will not negatively impact the surrounding property owners. 5. The proposed use is within an existing building within the 1 -2 Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. Permits for other agencies must be submitted to the City. 2. Any expansions of the facility would require a building permit. 3. No outside storage of materials is permitted. Respectfully submitted, William Arndt Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Cc: McLeod County, 840 CenturyAvenue, Hutchinson MN 55350 Solitra USA Inc. 0 Pnnud m rcycied par - 4 — G — T Publication No 6060 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, September 23.1999 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at City Hall on Tuesday, October 5, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of Eolding a public hearing regarding an application from: McLeod County, applicant, 1065 Fifth Ave S.E., is requesting a conditional use permit to change use of property to a household hazardous waste/materials recovery facility located in the I -2 (Heavy Industrial) district at the above address. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: E� lndk~ Loudon of Aropwry All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 5, 1999. Plans and materials are available at the cit offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. September 23, 1999 Date LJ CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff. Brad Emans, Dick Schieffer. Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Bonnie Baumetz, Marilvn M. Swanson and Julie Wischnack Date: September 10, 1999 — Meeting Date September 21, 1999 Applicant: McLeod County (applicant) Solitra USA, Inc. (owner) Brief Description The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit for a household hazardous waste building. The existing building is within the I -2 district. The County would be using the building to collect various types of household hazardous waste: paint. aerosol cans. household solvents. antifreeze. etc. The building would also be used for materials recovery. Materials recovery is the process of bringing recycling material. presorted. to the facility. Then. the items are transferred onto larger trucks. The proposal does not include sorting waste at the facility. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: I -2 Lot Size: 4.3 acres Existing Land Use: Solitra was utilizing the building. Currently it is vacant. Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: I -2 Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Industrial Zoning History: NA Applicable Regulations: Section 6.07 — Conditional Uses SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The property accesses from 5 Avenue. The range of people • visiting the site each day will average 13.28 people (high 22 low 8). The site would be open five days per week 8:00 a.m. until 4:30 p.m. (possibly Saturdays). 4 _( -a McLeod County Hazardous Waste Facility Planning Commission Review — September 21, 1999 Page 2 Parking: There is approximately 108 spaces available for parking. The code requires 1 space per 2.000 square feet of building. The building is approximately 24.000 square feet (pad square footage). The requirement would be 12 spaces. Analysis: The Building Inspector and Fire Chief have reviewed the building for code issues. Permits are required by other agencies such as: Environmental Protection Agency Identification Number update. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for Household Hazardous Waste and a Material Recovery Permit. Recommendation: The criteria to consider when reviewing a conditional use permit, are as follows: 1. That a proposed building or use at the particular location requested is necessary or desirable to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or communirv,: 2. That a proposed building or use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adiacent properrv, the character of the neighborhood traffic conditions, utility facilities and other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare: and 3. That the proposed building or use will be designed arranged and operated so as to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit because the use of the property is consistent with other uses in the area The recommendation would be with the following conditions: Permits for other agencies must be submitted to the City. Any expansions of the facility would require a building permit. No outside storage of materials is permitted. Cc: McLeod County, 840 Century AvePaul Betker. 37 Monroe Street, Hutchinson Solitra USA Inc. El RESOLUTION NO. 11335 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY AND MATERIALS RECOVERY CENTER FOR MCLEOD COUNTY AT 1065 FIFTH AVENUE SOUTHEAST BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS McLeod County, applicant and Solitra U.S.A. Inc. property owner. made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 to operate a household hazardous waste and materials recovery at an existing building. 2. The hazardous material portion of the request, requires the conditional use permit EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8 and 9, Block 1, 1st ADDITION TO HUTCMNSON INDUSTRIAL PARK 3. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the conditional use permit review. 4. The Planning Commission found that the application met the review criteria, particularly that the proposal • would not adversely affect the surrounding property owners and the property is zoned I -2. CONCLUSION The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions I. Permits for other azencies must be submitted to the City. 2. Any expansions of the facility would require a building permit. 3. No outside storage of materials is permitted. Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of October, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor Hutchinson City Center • 0 DATE: October 6. 1999 111 11� Street SE Hutchh t MN 55350-2522 320.597- SISI/Fn 320.234-4270 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY REX ERICKSON TO CONSTRUCT A 50' x 30'0500 SO FT-) GARAGE LOCATED AT 590 PETERSON CIRCLE NE. Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its Findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On August 10. 1999. Rex Erickson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a 50' x 30' garage on his pro Perry at 590 Peterson Circle NE. Any accessory building greater than 1.000 square feet requires a conditional use permit. FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 23. 1999- 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit with the following condition: 1. The building must be constructed as provided in the plans. 2. The conditional use permit is only valid for 6 months. Within that period, the applicant must apply for a building permit. TERMS: City reserves the right to review all conditional use permits at their discretion. Respectfully submitted, William Amdt, Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • cc: Rex Erickson. 590 Peterson Circle, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Primed M ie w pwe - Publication # 6061 indicates Location o /Property CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR REX ERICKSON S T I, BLOCK 1, PETERSON'S TERRACE eoauuwc Top xxe N M� at wxeewrm el MM tree, wee ska *Am* W- aware • 107&= 197* ?+x ,� -� a x d 49 / f . + _a QO d r.O r.r Ma x 2 r , i , ne a i � , x - x,a � men M qe M d"d � x m � , Tom LGF AWA • 1 1781 S*wo FNI o . io zo fo q L'ck . ,y UF see/* /e feet R.� �a \ A J p •! i 1 O 4� O � V • Now" M momma M O stn Me wxMMrl w RESOLUTION NO. 11336 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A LARGER THAN 1.000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING FOR REX ERICKSON AT 590 PETERSON CIRCLE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Rex Erickson, property owner, made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 to construct an accessory building larger than 1,000 square feet. ?. The proposed building is not a pole type construction, rather it will have horizontal siding and will be built with materials which are similar to the home. �x el�l��7e1. Y� �1171!![�I`►IRI Lot 1. Block I, PETERSON'S TERRACE 3. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the conditional use permit review. 4. The Planning Commission found that the application met the review criteria with respect to the project will not impact the surrounding property, nor will alter the character of the neighborhood. CONCLUSION The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions 1. The building must be constructed as provided in the plans. 2. The conditional use permit is only valid for 6 months. Within that period, the applicant must apply for a building permit. Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of October. 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Citv Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor � -G -S 0 C Hutchinson City Center Ill Hn n street SE Hutchia m :\IN 55350-2522 320.587.5151/Faz 320. 234 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6. 1999 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CON9I1lFRATTON OP PRFT M Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a final plat. HISTORY The plat was approved at a special meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesdav, October 5, 1999, at which tune there were no neighboring property owners objecting to the request. 0 FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application and plat maps were submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on September 23. 1999 3. a lot t con urtions would not accommodate twin homes, because of the lot sizes (9,600 square feet). 4. The developer will be responsible for sewer, water. and park fees. 5. The developer is responsible for the improvements. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat with the resolution of the following items. I s CONDITIONS I . Final utility and grading plans must be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 2. A subdivider's agreement must be executed. Respectfully submitted, Dean Wood, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Cc: Paul Betker. Property Owner Pnnud m RfYcicd paper- Publication No 6062 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, Thursday, September 23, 1 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street. Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, east. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at City Hall on Tuesday, October 5, 1999, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of Molding a public hearing regarding an application from: Paul Betker, property owner., is requesting a preliminary and final plat to be known as Walnut Ridge Estates Plat 2 located in Walnut Ridge Estates Plat with the following legal description: Legal Description: Outlot A, Walnut Ridge Estates The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: K OP ' B ladkems Loudon of Prapry All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 5, 1999. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. Setnember 23, 1999 Date 0 0 i 0 CJ 0 1 AD 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 r W W r to 7 ' 2 1 1 1 I 1 T - 1 1 1 ' I 1 1 __ -_1 I S 90 7336 1 2 ' 1 1 + ORoY2 3 r a 4g r -1102 -- - - - - -; li 3 I 1 r - 1201 e a r 5 - - -- 1 sy 0S 110100' 7 r I -- 9 IS-mw 1 -- I AVEMlE 1 0 J J DRANAGE AND UTLITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS. 1 II - 11 o 1 to r 3 1 4 5 1 1 ' 1 1 1 , 4ti T. w ,z uuo R n• � U TO 1 1 I 1 In i � q_L 4 4 Y 0 5 r a I I �I 5 � I _J I 2 . 1 r r, 1 I In i � q_L 4 4 Y 0 5 r a I I �I 5 � I _J I 2 . 1 r r, l.J RESOLUTION NO. 11337 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF THE PRELE IINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PLAT 2, LOCATED WEST OF HILLCREST ROAD NORTHEAST, SUBMITTED BY PAUL BETKER WHERE AS, Paul Betker. property owner, has submitted a preliminary and final plat to be known as WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PLAT 2 of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-wit; Existing Legal Description: Outlot A. Walnut Ridge Estates New Legal Description: Lots 1 -7. Block 1, and Lots 1 -7, Block 2, Walnut Ridge Estates Plat 2 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That said preliminary and final plat of WALNUT RIDGE ESTATES PLAT 2 is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following conditions: 1. Final utility and grading plans must be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction. 2. A subdivider's agreement must be executed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon said plat by Mayor and City Administrator, as required, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City Officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of October. 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin Torgerson City Administrator Mayor E Hutchinson City Center • 111 Hi Street SE Hutchlmoq MN 55710.2522 320.587.51511Fee 320.274 -4M MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 1999 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONI Pursuant to Section 6.05 of Chapter 7, Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a final P HISTORY The rezoning request was denied at a special meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 5, 1999 FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application and plat maps were submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surroundin g property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on September 23, 1999. 3. a lot I sizes provided in the site plan provided, for the consideration of rezoning, were not similar to the properties to the west. 4. The rezoning request would be out of character for the neighborhood. 5. There is reasonable use of the property with its current zoning as R -1. 6. The rezoning to R2 could permit up to 5 units per acre; whereas the area to the west has a density of 2.48 units per acre. This rezoning would be out of character for the area. 7. There a agricultural property to the east and south of the proposed rezoning area. 8. The option to provide a mix of zoning for this property would be a possibility to blend with the existing neighborhood (i.e. R -1 on the western portion of the property, R -2 on the southeastern portion). 9. A number of residents voiced concerns regarding the character and impact of the proposed rezoning. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning. Respectfully submitted, Dean Wood, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 1 Cc: Brian Sullivan, RLK Great Plains Development Berscheid Builders ttiema w arcW p" - —G — / ._.:_. ---- .-___.___ -------------- .___r_.:_. -------- -, -_ ---- _.,..___._ CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission • Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Schieffer. Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Bonnie Baumetz, Marilyn M. Swanson and Julie Wischnack Date: September 10, 1999 — Meeting Date September 21, 19 Applicant: Great Plains Development (Applicant and Property Owner) Brief Description The applicants are proposing rezoning of property from R -1 to R -2. The applicants are proposing a 128 unit development for the site. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R -1 Property Location: North of South Grade Road; West of Honey Tree Road: East of Lakewood Drive Southwest. Lot Size: 47.48 acres Existing Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Residential to the west; Rural to the east Comprehensive Land Use Plan: The comprehensive plan designates this area as low density residential on the western portion and medium density residential on the eastern portion. The low density designation allows for R -1 or R -2 zoning. Medium density allows for R -2 or R -3. Zoning History: NA Applicable Regulations: Section 6.05 — Land Use Rezonings SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: The applicants have provided a possible sketch plan of the • proposed development. The plan provides two access points onto South Grade Road. There are through streets indicated for Roberts Road and Eighth Street Southwest. Rezoning Great Plains Development Planning Commission Review — September 21, 1999 Page 2 Parking: NA Analysis: The proposal presents 128 residential units on 47.48 acres (2.7 units per acre). The adjacent density of existing lots is 2.9 units per acre. If the lakeshore lots on the west side of Lakewood Drive are added, the density is 2.5 units per acre. The site is partially within the shoreland district which provides for different lot size requirements. The minim lot size (nonriparian) for single family is 10,000 square feet. The minimum lot size for two family dwellings is 17,500 square feet (8,750 square feet per unit). For non- shoreland area the minimum requirements are 8.400 square feet for single family and 5,000 square feet for two family. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following Z - 41T5T1r1 L. There is R -2 Zoning to the north of this property. 2. The proposed densities are consistent with the comprehensive plan guidance. 3. The proposed densities are consistent with those in the area. Cc: Great Plains Development, 3030 Centre Point Drive #900, Roseville MN 55113 • RLK, project engineers Rob Collette. DNR Hydrologist • 0 Publication No 6069 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, October 7.199 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA I I 1 Hassan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at City Hall on Tuesday, October 19, 1999, at 5.30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Great Plains Development, property owner. is requesting a preliminary plat to be known as Bridgewater Estates Second Addition located east of Bridgewater Estates. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: • All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 19, 1999. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, b appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. City Administrator October 4, 1999 Date Preliminary Plat a' BRIDGEWATER ESTATES SECOND ADDIMN I r l+ r fit q 1 r fir` j '� �l `• r `'r If - `- l; F ;' 1 0 / I saw .r..•�.. I r a ` r . I I 7 `� I J• = 1 S E C I / 1 0`� �a/ r/ \`� / ._tY 1 _ 4�r •S' '{" �d' 0 16 1 it 1 fri:.iii 1• ji 4 -- r rr ��..�• r r , (� (� Fill "I PETITION OPPOSING REZONING REQUEST OF Great Plains Development We, the undersigned. oppose the request by Great PJataa Dersopmentto rezme the property locatged north of South Grade Road and east of La &^wd Drive S. W. from R -1 to R -2 and request that the HukNneon Planning Commission and+futchimon GkyCounall iejectthe rezorrirg 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 18 2R 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 29 30 PETITION OPPOSING REZONING REQUEST OF Groat Plains Development 40 We, the uMersi9ned, oppose the request by Gnat Plains Dawsk4 nsnt to rezone the Property tocalaed north of South Grade Road and east of Lakewood Drive S. W. from R -1 to R -2 and request that the ntcl neon Planning Commission and Hutdteon CitylCouncH reject the rezoning request. • v is tg 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 29 PETITION OPPOSING REZONING REQUEST OF Great Plains Development We, the undersigned, oppose the request by Great Plains Development to rezone the property locatged north of South Grade Road and east of Lakewood Drive S. W. from R -t to R -2 and request that the Hutchinson Planning Commission and Hutchinson City Council reject the rezoning request. 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 27 28 • 30 30 • September 15, 1999 Hutchinson Planning Staff City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Planning Staff: Re: Public heating notice dated September 3. 1999 regarding the property of the legal description that begins: That part of the South Half of Section 2. Township 116 North. Range 30 West, McLeod County, Minnesota (and continuing as stated in Publication No. 6063) We want the property located north of South Grade Road and east of Lakewood Drive SW to remain zoned for Single Family Residences. We do NOT want the zoning to change to multiple famiiv residences. We purchased our home on south Roberts Street with the knowledge that all houses in the area would be single family homes. We believe we bought a promise of that along with our property. We want things to remain that way - -R -1, Single Family Residence. Sincerely, ? Cli, ' James and Frances Shaff 720 Roberts St. SW Hutchinson. MN 55350 • I am submitting this letter in regard to the rezoning of property being developed by Great Plains Development from RI to R2. My feeling is that the zoning does not have to change. I have been a resident at 765 Lakewood Drive since June 27, 1997. Since that time I have seen 21 homes built. This has almost completed Bridgewater estates, and has completed South Lakewood addition. I fail to see a problem in building and selling family units in this area- Why now do we need to change and chance having a mix- matched development that has happened in other areas of Hutchinson? I say "No" to the rezoning. Another item that was touched upon is a park issue. When we paid for our home I noticed a park initiation fee that I had paid for. When I asked city hall about the issue they told me that the developer either donates land or money towards a park. I feel that with all the developments in the area, that a park is needed here. The only park around is Roberts Park. This area is very busy with all • the ball fields and a little secluded. To me it is not an ideal area for children to play. Sincerely, �& , YZ-46=> Re Lakewood-Drive- n Paul and Jennifer Traynor 770 Roberts St SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 (320) 234 -6536 October 5, 1999 This document has been written m regards to the rezone property request of the Great Plains Development located north of South Grade Road and east of Lakewood Drive S.W. from R -1 to District R -2. At this time, due to several concerns, I reject the above motion to rezone the Great Plains Development from R -1 (Single Family Residence) district to R -2 (Multiple Family Residence — one or two family dwellings). Please feel free to contact me for further actions. Regards, Paul Traynor • I* n u RESOLUTION NO. 11338 RESOLUTION DENYING THE REZONING REQUEST OF GREAT PLAINS DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY NORTH OF SOUTH GRADE ROAD AND EAST OF LAKEWOOD DRIVE SOUTHWEST BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Great Plains Development, property owner, made application to the City Council for a Rezoning under Section 6.05 to rezone the property from R -1 to R -2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of the South Half of Section 2, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, McLeod County, Minnesota. described as follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of said Section 2; thence North 89 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 2 a distance of 1972.18 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 0 degrees 04 minutes 26 seconds West 1328.81 feet; thence North 89 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West 899.21 feet; thence North 74 degrees 15 minutes 01 second West 331.88 feet to the easterly line of SOUTH LAKEWOOD ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof, thence South 10 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds West, along said easterly line. 40.00 feet thence southerly, along said easterly line, 46.11 feet along a tangential curve concave to the east having a radius of 270.00 feet and a central angle of 9 degrees 47 minutes 06 seconds: thence South 0 degrees 31 minutes 34 seconds West, along said easterly line, tangent to said curve. 532.02 feet to the southeast comer of said SOUTH LAKEWOOD ESTATES; thence North 89 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds West, along the southerly line of said SOUTH LAKEWOOD ESTATES, 129.47 feet: thence westerly along said southerly line, 194.08 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north, having a radius of 335.00 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 11 minutes 37 seconds: thence North 56 dues 16 minutes 49 seconds West, along said southerly line, tangent to the last described curve, 182:9 feet to the southeasterly line of Lakewood Drive; thence South 33 degrees 43 minutes I 1 seconds West along said southeasterly line, 234.63feet; thence South 23 demos 16 minutes 51 seconds West, along said southeasterly line, 365.10 feet; thence south 45 degrees 15 minutes 18 seconds West, along said southeasterly line, 300.49 feet: thence South 54 degrees 59 minutes 00 seconds West, along said southeasterly line, 148.33 feet thence southwesterly 94.66 feet along said southeasterly line, along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 100.00 feet and a central angle of 54 degrees 14 minutes 05 seconds; thence South 0 degrees 44 minutes 55 seconds West, tangent to the last desesibed curve. 33.00 feet to the south line of the southwest Quarter of said Section 2; thence South 89 degrees 15 minutes 05 seconds East, along the last said south line, 1666.10 feet to the southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter. thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 26 seconds East alone the south line of said Southeast Quarter of Section 2, a distance of 687.50 feet to the point of beginning. 2. The Citv Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission. 3. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the application based on the following findings: The rezoning request would be out of character for the neighborhood; there is agricultural property to the east and south of the proposed rezoning area: the option to provide a mix of zoning for this property would be a possibility to blend with the existing neighborhood (1.e. R -1 on the western portion of the property, R -2 on the southeastern • portion); a number of residents voiced concerns regarding the character and impact of the proposed rezoning. Resolution NO. 1133 Great Plains Development October 12, 1999 Page 2 CONCLUSION The City Council denies the rezoning request. Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of October, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor • • 0 Hutchinson Citv Center C 111 Hr sneer SE Huftlu n. NM 553542522 324587.515 VFW 320.1144240 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 6, 1999 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 407 SCHOOL ROAD AS REQUESTED BY BARRY BARTON Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditionai use permit. HISTORY After direction from the Citv Council. the owner made application for an amendment to a conditional use permit on August 25, 1999. FINDINGS OF FACT I . The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, September 23, 1999. 3. tT conditional use permit amendment requested changes in the time of fencing, building construction and pavement installation. 4. There were concerns voiced by neighboring property owners regarding the permit. 5. The following is considered an amendment to the original conditional use permit issued to the Propem: 1. Fencing -east side (1999), north side (2000), remaining fencing (200 1) 2. Two southern buildings - to be constructed in April or May of 2000. 3. Two northern buildings - to be constructed in 2001 (slabs to be poured fall of 2000). 4. Pavement on the north end - to be installed when slabs are constructed (2000). RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit with the above stated time frame: Respectfully submitted, William Amdt, Acting Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 Cc: Barry Barton, 19272 Lace Avenue, Hutchinson MN 55350 Pnom4 m �Ied ,. . ,�-(;: -/ 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11339 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 11079, ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 22,1998 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BARRY BARTON, OWNER OF 407 SCHOOL ROAD BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: 1. Barry Barton, property owner, made application to the City Council for an amendment to Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, after the City received complaints regarding the original permit. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. SORENSON'S ADDITION 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the conditional permit review. ip 3. The Planning Commission found that the application met the review criteria and the permit should be amended. 4. The City Council is not replacing Resolution No. 11079, but rather amending the permit. The City Council approves the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions of timing for the project: 1. Fencing — east side (1999), north side (2000), remaining fencing (2001) 2. Two southern buildings — to be constructed in April or May of 2000. 3. Two northern buildings — to be constructed in 2001 (slabs to be poured fall of 2000). 4. Pavement on the north end — to be installed when slabs are constructed (2000). 5. If conditions 1 -4 are not met, the owner is required to request an amendment to the permit. Adopted by the City Council this 12" day of October, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator L A Marlin D. Torgerson, Mayor _ q �J J Hutchinson City Center C MEMORANDUM 1I1 llama Street SE Hutchinson. MN 55350.7522 320. 587- 5151lFax 320.2344240 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY PAXTON ANDERSON TO CONSTRUCT A MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENCE TN AN R -3 DISTRICT (ONE 5 -UNIT) LOCATED AT 851 DALE STREET SOUTHWEST. Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Chapter I I of the Hutchinson City Code. the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On April 21, 1999, Paxton Anderson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct multi- family residences in an R -3 district (One, 5 -unit building and one, 2 -unit building). The application was deemed incomplete. Complete information was provided on July 21, 1999. The August 17, 1999 meeting of the Planning Commission recommended denial. The City Council discussed it at their August 24, 1999 meeting and requested the Planning Commission reconsider their motion. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the request at their October 5, 1999 meeting. The adjacent land use and zoning is single family residential, R -2 zoning, abutting on the Fast West and South; four unit residential, R -3 zoning, abutting on the North. Density requirements have been met. The buffer on the eastern property line will be maintained and improvements as recommended by the City Forester would be completed. Utility easements extending beyond the buffer will be dedicated A storm water pond would be constructed as to not add any run-off greater than predevelopment standards. FINDINGS OF FACT I. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 5, 1999. 3. The proposal was found to be in compliance with the conditional use permit criteria. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: I- No building or construction may occur within the treeOc ub ara on the castem portion of the property. The property rust be staked prior to wi sauwon of the units nd must be venfled by staff. Improvements. as recommended by the Fores err. must be completed. 2. The storm water pond may not be located so that it disturbs the buffer. The pond must also pipe the water back to the Dale Sweet aria. 3. The storm water pond must be corwmard w in not add any mm-off greater draft pre - development standards. 4. This recommendation is not based on subdividing the property, as that has not been included in the application. 5. Utility easements most be dedicated. Respectfully submitted, Dean Wood Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Cc: Paxton Anderson Pnmad on recycled paper- DATE: October 6. 1999 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Schieffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary PleM Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, Christie Rock, Bonnie Baumetz Date: August 2, 1999 - Meeting date August 17, 1999 Applicant: Paxton Anderson (Applicant and property owner) Property Location: 851 Dale Street Southwest Brief Description The Planning Commission reviewed this request at their last meeting. At the City Council meeting, the applicant requested the matter be tabled or sent back to the Planning Commission with a revised plan. (See Letter) The City Council requested that the applicant revise the site plan and have the plan reconsidered at the Planning Commission level. The proposed plan has a five -plex located in the same area as the previous plan. The twin -home has been removed. A conditional use permit is only required for three unit buildings or larger. 0 GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: The existing zoning of the property is R -3 (Multiple Family Residence District.) Lot Size: Approximately 1.9 acres Existing Land Use: Multiple Family Residential Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single family residential. R -2 zoning, abutting on the East West and South. Four unit residential, R -3 zoning, abutting on the North Medium density residential — up to 6 units per acre. The area to the north is approximately 5.59 units per acre. The area to the east is 4.1 units per acre. The previously proposed density, with 9 units, was 4.74 units per acre. As revised, the proposed density would be 3.68 units per acre. Zoning History: NA 0 -G /o Paxton Anderson — Conditional Use Permit - Planning Commission Review — September 21, 1999 Page 2 Applicable Regulations: Section 8.06 — Conditional Use Permit required for construction of three to eight unit buildings located in the R -3 District. SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Dale Street Southwest Parking: Section 10.03 requires 2 spaces per dwelling unit for the duplexes. The five -plex requires 2 spaces per dwelling unit (which cannot be located in the driveway) and .5 spaces for visitors. The site plan addresses the additional parking to the west of the units. Analysis: Density - The code requires a minimum of 5,000 square feet per unit for two - family units and 4,200 square feet per unit for three to eight unit buildings. There is a total site area of 84,110 square feet. One five family unit and an existing duplex requires 31,000 square feet of total site area. This requirement has been met. Setbacks and Future Subdivision - The applicant is not proposing to plat the property at this time: therefore the units would be rented. If there is a subdivision in the future. staff has concerns about whether this lavout would provide for platting. Setback requirements, if platted, are as follows: Buffer Area — There is a buffer area of existing trees on the eastern portion of the property. The City Forester will be reviewing the health of the buffer and will provide a recommendation. It may be necessary to revegetate some parts of the buffer to ensure a buffer will continue for the single family homes to the east. Staff is concerned about the location of storm water pond being too close to the eastern property line and being within the tree area. Staff would recommend a move of the building to the west or movement of the pond. The pond would need a new pipe to the Dale Street storm water system. Fire/Emergency Service — This is no longer an issue. Utilities — Staff is concerned about future utility locations if the property is subdivided. Additionally, there is a requirement for a 10 -foot perimeter easement. Staff is recommending this be a wider corridor as to not affect the existing buffer line. Required 5 unit Strttt ri¢ht of way_ 30' (25' for two unit) 110' Interior Lot Line 20' — more for height over 20' (10' for two unit) 20' Rear 40' (25' for two unit) 1 40' Buffer Area — There is a buffer area of existing trees on the eastern portion of the property. The City Forester will be reviewing the health of the buffer and will provide a recommendation. It may be necessary to revegetate some parts of the buffer to ensure a buffer will continue for the single family homes to the east. Staff is concerned about the location of storm water pond being too close to the eastern property line and being within the tree area. Staff would recommend a move of the building to the west or movement of the pond. The pond would need a new pipe to the Dale Street storm water system. Fire/Emergency Service — This is no longer an issue. Utilities — Staff is concerned about future utility locations if the property is subdivided. Additionally, there is a requirement for a 10 -foot perimeter easement. Staff is recommending this be a wider corridor as to not affect the existing buffer line. Paxton Anderson — Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Review — September 21,1999 Page 3 Open Space — The Zoning Code requires at least 20% (16.552 sf) of the site be open space. The site provides approximately 18,600 square feet of open space within the setback areas. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit if the following conditions are met: 1. The buffer must be maintained on the eastern property line. Improvements, as recommended by the Forester, must be completed. 2. The storm water pond may not be located so that it disturbs the buffer. The pond must also pipe the water back to the Dale Street area. 3. The storm water pond must be constructed as to not add any tun off greater than pre- development standards. 4. This recommendation is not based on subdividing the property, as that has not been included in the application. 5. Utility easements must be dedicated. Below are the standards to be considered when issuing a conditional use permit: 1. That a proposed building or use at the particular location requested is necessary or desirable to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community; 2. That a proposed building or use will not have a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facilities and other matters affecting the public health. safety and general welfare; and 3. That the proposed building or use will be designed, arranged, and operated so as to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. cc: Paxton Anderson. 224 S. 7` St., Montevideo MN 56265 0 Publication u 6066 11 24 > , 1 3 B 5 5 5 S y 2 7 6 9 72 C 6 6 6 11 LINDEN 7 t1 10 B 16 4 3 2 1 1 8 7 10 is 5 6 7 $ 10 ` $ 9 17 � 4�S LA AVE SW 19 � 11 3 1 2 1 851 Tf f� 9 1 Indicates Location of Property 5 6 1 7 S V AVE SW 7 6 q J 3 4 5 5 Sr SW PAF 0 i SITE PLAN i I" = 40' - 0 " ly , 1 4 -G /n • Memo To: Julie VYischnach From Mark Schnobrich, City Forester CC: Dab: 08/09199 Re: 851 Dale St SW Buffer Area Y I reviewed the buffer areas between 851 Dale St SW, Laura and Craig Avenue SW residents. There are presently approximately 20 trees greater than 6 inch — diameter, of which one is oak and one elm. The rest of the trees > 6' dia. are • Boxelder of poor quality due in part to their lean or trunk defects. The line of trees at the present time provide an adequate buffer during the season of foliation however further deterioration will occur due to the present condition of the trees. My recommendation is to enhance the buffer with the addition of evergreen, preferably spruce, and to plan for the addition of hardwoods such as oak, Linden and/or maple for year around buffer capabilities and longevity. Removal of some of the trees in poor condition may be required to allow for proper planting • • Page 1 9 RESOLUTION NO. 11340 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 5- PLEX WITHIN THE R -3 ZONING DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY PAXTON ANDERSON, OWNER OF 851 DALE STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Paxton Anderson, property owner, made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 to construct a 5 -plex within an R -3 Zoning District. 2. The property contains an existing duplex unit. LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: Abstract of Title to Lot Ninety -two (92). Lynn .Addition to Hutchinson. Minn.. excepting therefrom the following described trays, to-wit: Commencing at the Northeast Comer of said Lot 92: thence Southerly along the East line of said Lot 92 :225 feet: thence Westerly on a line parallel i with the North line of said Lot 92 to a point on the West line of said Lot 92; thence Northeasterly along the West line of said Lot 92 to the Northwest Comer of said Lot 92; thence Easterly along the North line of said Lot 92 to the point of commencement. Also excepting therefrom the following described tract, to-wit: Be inning at the Southeast Comer of said Lot 92; thence Easterly, along the South line of said Lot 92, 81.73 feet, to a point said point also being the Northeast Comer of Lot Ten (10) in Block One (1) "Lorens Third Addition ", according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds. McLeod County. Minnesota thence Northwesterly 82.42 feet to a point on the West line of said Lot 92, distant 12.60 feet North of the Southwest Comer of said Lot 92, thence Southerly, along said West line. 12.60 feet to the point of beginning. ALSO. That pan of Lot Ten (10) in Block One (1) of "LOREN'S THIRD ADDITION" described as follows. to -wit: Commencing at the most Northerly Comer of said Lot 10: thence Southerly alone the East line of said Lot 10. 44,13 feet; thence Northwesterly. North 82 degrees 17 minutes 16 seconds West. 23.53 feet to the West line of said Lot 10. and thence Northeasterly, along said West line. 47.21 feet to the point of beginning. McLeod County Minnesota- ALSO The West Half of Lot Eight (8) in Block One (1) of SCHMIDTBAUERS SECOND ADDMON, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota 3. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the conditional use permit review. 4. The Planning Commission found that the application met the review criteria, particularly that the proposal would not adversely affect the surrounding property owners if the buffer area is not disturbed. CONCLUSION The City Council approves the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: I. No building or construction may occur within the tree/scrub area on the eastern portion of the property. The property must be staked prior to construction of the units and must be verified by staff. Improvements, as recommended by the Forester (dazed 8!9/99), must be completed. Z The storm water pond may not be located so that it disturbs the buffer. The pond must also pipe the water back to the Dale Street area 3. The storm water pond must be constructed as to not add any run -off greater than prc- development standards. 4. This recommendation is not based on subdividing the property, as that has not been included in the application. 5. Utility easements must be dedicated (outside of buffer area)- -[' �o Resolution No. 11340 Paxton Anderson CUP October 12, 1999 Page 2 Adopted by the City Council this 12'" day of October, 1999. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 0 I"1 U • • CITY OF HUTCIIINSON RESOLUTION NO. 11341 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE FOR THE 1999 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2000 Be it resolved by the council of the City of Hutchinson, County of McLeod, Minnesota, that the county auditor is authorized to fix a property tax rate for taxes payable in the year 2000 that is higher than the tax rate calculated pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 204B.135 for the city for taxes levied in 1998, collectible in 1999. Adoption of this resolution does not prohibit the city from certifying a final levy that will result in no tax rate increase or a tax rate decrease. The city clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the county auditor of McLeod County, Minnesota. 1�1 Adopted by the City Council this 12` day of October 1999 Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 1] Memorandum To: Marilyn Swanson From: Randy DeVries Date: 10/12/99 Re: 1999 Annual Evaluation and Planning System This agenda item could have been in the consent agenda, and is a yearly report that I file. Hutchinson scored very well on this report, and everything looks good. Please have the mayor sign it after it has been approved and send it to MPCA. Thank you. City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services III Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2521 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464 (320) 587 -5151 (320) 587 -2975 — i (320) 587 -2242 Fax (320) 234 -4240 Fax (320) 234 -4240 Fax (320) 587 -6427 - Primed on recycled paper - db lowftilloo September 1999 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mr. Randy DeVries Director of Water & Wastewater Operations Citv of Hutchinson City Center I I I Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 RE: 1999 Annual Evaluation and Planning System Dear Mr. DeVries: Thank you for participating in the 1999 Annual Evaluation and Planning System (AEPS) process. Your evaluation was reviewed and enclosed is a report based on your responses. We recommend the report be discussed at an upcoming municipal council /board meeting. In some cases, items identified in the report may require immediate attention. Comparing this year's data with that of past evaluations may help identify areas of concern for your wastewater system. After the meeting, the mayor /municipal chair should certify that the report has been discussed and submit this certification to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. If possible, this should be done within 30 days of your receipt of the report. The certification can be in the form of a letter signed by the mayor /chair. We hope the report information will prove useful in planning for the future of wastewater treatment in your municipality. If you need any assistance or have any questions regarding the AEPS process, would like assistance in implementing suggestions from the report, or would like a copy of the summary report, please feel free to contact me at (651) 296 -4555 or 1 -800- 657 -3864. Sincerely, �k Ron Omann Majors Section Policy and Planning Division RO:jmd Enclosure cc: Hon. Marlin Torgeson (without enclosures) 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194; (651) 296 -6300 (Voice); (651) 282 -5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester ( Equal Opporlundy Eniplvaer • Printed on recyded paper containing at least 20% tlbers from paper recycled by consumers . >>> MUNICIPALITY: HUTCHINSON 0 This report contains responses to questions you answered in the 1999 Annual Evaluation and Planning System form. Although you answered all the applicable questions in the form, not every answer received a response in this report. We provided a response only when an answer indicated that there is an issue which may need resolution. MPCA staff have assigned a point value to the various questions in this form, with the exception of questions in Section 8, Future Needs. Points are given to responses that indicate that there may be a problem to be addressed. Each section is worth 100 points. If your system received a score greater than 50 in any section, you should carefully review the report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating effectively and efficiently. If you need assistance in implementing any of the suggestions in this report or have questions concerning the report or survey process, please feel free to contact Ron Omann at 1- 800 - 657 -3864. >>> SECTION ONE: TREATMENT SYSTEM PHYSICAL CONDITION Your responses to the questions 2, 4, 7, and /or 12 demonstrate your awareness that major repairs or replacement are needed in the next five years. As you are aware, this requires a great deal of'planning, including funding, construction, permit modifications, and choosing of a consultant. If you have questions about our role in this process, please feel free to contact us at 1- 800 - 657 -3864. Score for SECTION 1: 7, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION THREE: COLLECTION SYSTEM. Questions 25 -26. If your system is experiencing significant bypasses or overflows, you should investigate the causes and take the steps necessary to correct them. Question 28. Basement backups of untreated wastewater are a health risk. Evaluate the cause of the backups and look for remedial action to eliminate them. Score for SECTION 3: 31, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION FOUR: BIOSOLIDS Question 34.3. We suggest a minimum of six months of biosolids storage to allow flexibility in the operation of your system. However, there is no such D A requirement in the state or federal rules at the present time. Each city must evaluate their storage needs based on field access. Field accessibility depends on a number of factors. One is the types of crops grown in your area. For instance, row crops do not allow access in the summer. Another factor is what equipment your city has for hauling and land application. Finally, there are slope restrictions for winter applications. State rules restrict winter application to sites with less than a 28 slope. Question 34.6. You indicated that you plan to obtain new landspreading sites. Be aware that the approval process takes one to three months. If you have not completed an application or need information on the application process, please contact Jorja Dufresne at 1- 800- 657 -3864. Question 34.7. Investigate and respond to site complaints as promptly as possible. This helps you maintain good relations with the populace. Score for SECTION 4: 20, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION FIVE: SEPTAGE Score for SECTION 5: 0, WHERE.0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION SIX: TREATMENT SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Score for SECTION 6: 0, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION SEVEN: FINANCIAL AND ORDINANCE STATUS The area of sewer service charge systems and sewer use ordinances is complex and confusing. Municipalities which received funding from the federal or state construction grants program or the State Revolving Fund (loan program) face certain requirements in the area of ordinances. we have sample ordinances and charge systems which you can use to create your own documents. If you have questions concerning ordinances, charge systems, rate setting, or whether you must meet the requirements of specific funding programs, please contact Ron Omann at 1 -800- 657 -3864. Question 71. Your sewer service charge system should be reviewed by municipal officials annually. User rate adjustments should be made as a result of this review. Your charge system should describe, at a minimum: the different kinds of wastewater generators in your municipality; what constitutes normal strength domestic waste; how user charges are calculated; what the surcharges for greater than normal domestic strength waste; industrial rate schedules: and whether users are charged proportionately to their water use. Score for SECTION 7: 20, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION EIGHT: FUTURE NEEDS Question 85. Connection of currently unsewered homes to your treatment system will add flows and loadings to your treatment system. If your system does not have capacity for these additional flows and loadings, an expansion will be necessary. In addition, a sewer extension may be needed. Question 86. Enclosed is information on the State Revolving Fund loan program and the wastewater Infrastructure Fund. Low interest loans are given by the Public Facilities Authority to fund wastewater treatment projects. The interest rates are determined by a municipality's fiscal status. If you have questions concerning the program, please contact Terry Kuhlman at 1 -800- 657 -3858. 0 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON MEMO Finance Department October 8, 1999 We will ask the council to consider setting a workshop date for 2000 budget review. • �— 14 0 • LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW October 1999 SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Friday, November 12, 1999 • ' Y' —16. City of Hutchinson, Minnesota RFP: LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW • The City of Hutchinson is proposing to review the operations at its municipally owned liquor store (Liquor Hutch) to determine if expansion either into a larger facility or the addition of a second facility should be pursued. It is the goal of this review to provide the professional insight and supporting information necessary to help direct the City of Hutchinson toward the appropriate decision. The Scope of Services shall include development of a complete report with supporting research based on the following questions: Should the City of Hutchinson expand its off -sale liquor store operations with: 1.) an additional store, or 2.) a singular larger store, at a new site? This is the basis for all of the following questions. The City has previously considered adding a second store in a different part of town to enhance existing sales and service. The City has previously expressed the desire to maintain a store in the downtown area, but understands the need and/or demand for a store more accessible and visible from regional/state traffic. The consultant shall review the options of an additional site versus a . new, single site for a larger facility. Comparisons of the two options shall be noted in detail with supporting financial information. This shall be noted as "Phase P'. All other items shall be included in Phase 2. 2. What would be the most advantageous location for the new store? The City has assumed that a new location should be near the major shopping area on Highway 15 South. We have also assumed that the location should provide for easy access for north -bound traffic, since this would be the primary movement of vacation/recreational traffic on weekends. It would be expected that the consultant would determine general geographic areas that would be the most advantageous, and also provide support in reviewing specific sites that the City of Hutchinson is interested in reviewing. This specific site review shall be within 6 months of completion of the report, and shall include up to 2 visits to the City. 3. When would be the best time to proceed? Based on the projections developed, what would be the appropriate time frame for proceeding with the new store? The City may need to acquire a site prior to proceeding with the store itself. 4. What would be the recommended size/layout of the store? Consultant shall develop a scaled, schematic drawing of the proposed store noting approximate layout of the store. The consultant shall base the layout on their review and . recommendation of the type and extent of services and products to be provided. This recommendation should include type and cost of fixtures and needed equipment. A Page 2 U 0 City of Hutchinson MiILARnra RFP: LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW tabulation of these services and products shall be included in the report. 5. What would be the impact of the second store on the sales at the current location? Review sales of existing store to determine sales shift if any to new store. Determine the impact a second store would have on inventory of existing store. Determine changes to current store operation and pro forma income statement for current store. 6. What would the estimated sales be at the new store? Develop sales expectations for years 1 through 5 and year 10 for each facility, or combined facility. Develop staffing needs based upon sales expectations and pro - froma financial statements for said years. 1Y. 1 11 FMWI 1 ► OW tu: 1 The City has the following information available for review: • Overall sales history • Products (individual product sales histories are available) • Customer traffic counts • Vehicle traffic counts in Hutchinson area The tentative schedule is as follows: RFP submittal deadline November 12, 1999 Recommendation to Council/Contract Awarded November 23, 1999 Report completed January 7, 2000 The Consultant shall submit ten (10) copies of the Proposal for Services. The Proposal shall include the following information: Consultant's name, address, brief history, organizational structure and primary professional disciplines. 2. Description of consultant's previous related work experience. The list shall include work completed in the last five years, and should emphasize services directly related to the work noted in the Scope of Services. 3. Names and resumes of personnel who will be assigned to the project. Resumes shall include qualifications, experience and role in previous projects, as well as what capacity they will serve on this project. 0 4. A list of proposed subconsultants or associates to be utilized, if any. Indicate the role the subconsultants will play and the approximate percentage of total services they will provide. Page 3 City of Hutchinson, Minnesota RFP: LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW • 5. The proposed total fees, including the type of contract for reimbursement. Please separate the estimated costs for Phase 1 and Phase 2. A Project Schedule noting, at a minim expected dates for plans and specification completion, bid opening, and work commencement and completion. All information shall be submitted in a professional format. It is requested that extraneous information be excluded from the submittal. Any loose pamphlets must be attached to the submittal or located in an attached pocket. The final selection of a consultant will be made by the City Council based on the recommendation of a Selection Committee. The evaluation criteria is proposed to be based on a point system as follows: ITEM POINTS. Previous related experience/Capacity to perform work • (including proposed schedule, availability, staff assignment and experience) 40 Client references 30 Estimated cost of services 2Q TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE 100 The City reserves the right to modify the selection criteria prior to final selection. If additional information is requested prior to the submission deadline, all consultants will be sent clarifications to the RFP. This proposal may be modified or amended prior to then. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments: Neil Wegner Manager of Liquor Hutch City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Liquor Hutch 245 Washington Avenue East Phone: (320) 587 -2762 FAX: (320) 234 -4240 Page 4 • 0 0 File: l: ILlQUOR1RFP -99. doc Page 5 e -mail: nwegner@ci.hutchinson.mn.us City of Hutchinson, Minnesota RFP: LIQUOR HUTCH EXPANSION AND OPERATION REVIEW McComb Group, Ltd. 1040 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 -2118 (612) 339 -7000 FAX (612)- 388 -5572 Grinstead & Associates P.O. Box 451 Hamel IL 62046 -0451 (618) 633 -2762 FAX (618) 633 -2761 Dakota Worlwide 4801 81' Street Suite 105 Minneapolis MN 55437 (612) 835 -4505 is FAX (612) 835 -4461 Advantage Marketing Group 2907 Clearwater Road St Cloud MN 56301 (320) 253 -6392 FAX (320) 253 -5740 Sabongi Consulting Group, Inc. 596 Hackmore Drive Eagan MN 55123 -3041 (651) 452 -8308 FAX (651) 452 -2318 Infinity Development 615 Nokomis Suite 100 Alexandria MN 56308 (320) 762 -4258 FAX (320) 762 -4259 • Page 6 RECE cif 7 C 1 5 , 1999 CITY ut- rlul GHIPMN Hutchinson Utilities Commission Hutchinson, Minnesota 225 Michigan Street 55350 Date: October 5, 1999 To: City Council City of Hutchinson From: Hutchinson Utilities Commission Subject: Building Permit and Variance Fees The Hutchinson Utilities Commission met on Friday, October 1, 1999, for it's regular monthly meeting. Formal action was taken to ask the City Council of the City of Hutchinson to waive all building permit and variance fees relating to the building addition and renovation of city property at 225 Michigan St SE. Roger Gilmer President Paul Ackland Vice President David Wens" Secretary Douglas Ward Commissioner Craig Lenz Commissioner Clarence L. Kadnnas, P.E. General Manager Tel 320.587.4748 Fax 320 - 587-4721 J utc ti dies w ding ernd age 1 • From: Mark Hensen To: Gary Plotz; Julie Wischnack; Ken Merrill Date: 10/11199 10:37AM Subject: Hutch Utilities Building Permit I understand that Hutch Utilities is requesting that the City Council waive the Building Permit Fees for their proposed project. Building Permit fees for the addition and remodel project at Hutch Utilities is as follows: Construction Valuation is $ 1,503,000 Building Permit 5,377.30 Plan Review 3,495.25 Excavation 30.00 State Surcharge 701.20 Plumbing Permit 250.00 State Surcharge can not be waived, $ 701.20 Note: As of 10- 11 -99, No Building Permit has been applied for. Construction can not start until Building Permit Application is completed and signed by the contractor or ownerl Only a Grading & Excavating permit was issued to enable the contractor to do the required soils corrections. No authorization to pour footings and foundations has been given. Variance must be approved by Planning Commission and City Council before building permit can be issued and construction begins. CC: MARILYN J SWANSON; MARILYN M SWANSON 0 t L <!J r� L� Minnesota Department of Transportation CiTlturguI L •, Office of Aeronautics _ CP Mail Stop 410 �F' Phone: 651/296 -8202 222 East Plato Boulevard Phone: 651/297 -1600 St. Paul, MN 55107 -1618 ; iyyy Fax: 651/297 -5643 July 16. 1999 Fax: 651/296 -1828 ,�'jIT�Ur rIL— v_tyllY�yON Mr. John Rodeberg City Engineer Hutchinson City Center I 1 I Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Dear Mr. Rodeberg: Subject: State Aid for Airport Maintenance and Operation Enclosed are four copies of the agreement for requesting state aid for maintaining your airport during all seasons of the year for the biennium July 1, 1999, through June 30, 2001, along with a proposed form of resolution. For maintenance and operation during the year, the state will reimburse 2/3 of the documented, routine maintenance costs, not to exceed the base amount of state aid as set forth in the agreement for the cost of snowplowing, mowing, fertilizing, re- seeding, rehabilitating runway lights. landing strip markers, and drainage systems, and general maintenance of the runways, taxiways, and apron areas. The base amount of state aid has been calculated for each airport based on the amount of runway infrastructure. This calculation is included herein for your file. Is A separate supplement amount that is over and above the base amount is available exclusively for requesting reimbursement of expenses for airport maintenance training activities. This would include attendance at the Minnesota Aviation Symposium by any individual having operational involvement with your airport. Reimbursement will be based on actual time and cost records kept by the municipality. Prior to any reimbursement being made by the state. the municipality must have a zoning authority established, and such authority must have adopted or be in the process of adopting an airport zoning ordinance in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 360.061 to 360.074. Reimbursement may be denied entirely or in -part if the airport is not properly maintained. If you desire state assistance and agree to comply with the requirements of the agreement. please complete and submit f= copies of the agreement and fQu copies of the resolution to this office for the encumbrance of state funds. (A mailing label is enclosed for your convenience.) An approved copy will be retumed for your records. It is particularly important during the winter and spring seasons, or when hazardous conditions may exist. to keep the air - traveling public informed of the status or condition of your airport. This is accomplished by notifying the nearest Federal Aviation Administration, Flight Service Station and this office. Sincerely, 0 David J. Nybakken, Director Airport Development Section Enclosure An equal opportunity employer Iifr, James D. Groehler, RE Regional AlWrt Fs►8lneer I�In/DOT, Of floe of Aeroasmics 272 East Plato Boulevud glint Pant Iii 551074618 11- Jun -9c, Hutchinson Item uq antity unit cost, $ totals paved runway 6.89 acres 1,474 per acre $10,156 turf runway 0 acres 220 per acre $0 parallel taxiway 4000 ft 22 per 100 ft $880 beacon small /large 1 each 70 each one $70 LIRL & LITHL 0 lamps 10 per lamp $0 MIRL & MITHL 54 lamps 15 per lamp $810 HIRL & HITHL 0 lamps 40 per lamp $0 MALSR 0 set 1,056 per set $0 ODAL 0 set 53 per set $0 PAR 16 lamps 145 per lamp $2,320 REIL 4 lamps 53 per lamp $212 VASI 0 lamps 79 per lamp $0 taxiway light 24 lamps 15 per lamp $360 guidance sign 21 lamps 22 per lamp $462 calculated annual M &O reimbursement paint striping deduction 6.89 acres 00 & 01 annual M &O reimbursement ceiling 98 & 99 annual encumbrance amount (48) per acre $15,270 ($331) $14,939 $13,500 b C1 E r� AIRPORT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS Eligible Items for ;tale Reimb urs m nt * Mowing. snow removal, and other on -site maintenance costs ' Unit rental rates for city. county. or contracted equipment * Operational costs for maintenance equipment. Airport Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) . ehicles. and fire extinguishers kept on the airport for airport use Maintenance personnel salaries and benefits " Utilities and supplies for areas used by the public, free of charge " Maintenance and repair of sponsor -owned hangars and public buildings " Liability and property insurance * Airport 's share of general city audit if not part of project costs * Pavement patching and crack sealing * Environmental application and permit fees Ineligible Items fgr State Reim h ra m nt ' Costs reimbursable from some other source ' Airport licenses Capital improvements " Engineering and architectural services " Attorney's fees ' Airport manager's salary and related administrative expenses " Airport commission salaries and expenses * Operational and maintenance costs for privately -owned areas and facilities " Interest payments " Mortgage payments ' Propernvrealestate taxes * Expenses on leased or rented lands (fertilizer. etc.) ' Costs covered by other agreements (paint striping, beacon repair. VOR and NDB upkeep, unit rental rates for maintenance equipment purchased with state aid) ' Project audit costs ' Advertising ' Memberships ' Subscriptions ]ioible ltems_5uRplemental F ind fnr \1aint Train * Minnesota Airport Symposium * Fireirescue (ARFF) training * Airport maintenance training and workshops Environmental workshop expenses ' Pavement maintenance conferences Rev. 7/99 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRANT AGREEMENT FOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION It is resolved by the City of Hutchinson as follows: 1. That the state of Minnesota Agreement No. 78956 "Grant Agreement for Airport Maintenance and Operation," at the Hutchinson Mnnicipal Airport is accepted. 2. That the and are (Mayor, Chairperson, President, etc.) (Clerk, Auditor, Secretary, etc.) authorized to execute this Agreement and any amendments on behalf of the CERTIFICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF I certify that the above Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution adopted by the (Name of the Municipality) at an authorized meeting held on the day of as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Signature: , 199—, (Clerk or Equivalent) CORPORATE SEAL /OR/ NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: 'J -3), Rev. 7/99 Mn/DOT Agreement No. 78956 GRANT AGREEMENT FOR AIRPORT MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION R encv: T -79 State Encumbered Amount: 511,939.00 te Fiscal Years: 2000 and 2001 MAPS Order Number: Budget Office: (Authorized Signature) MAPS Entry - Sign and Date (Individual signing certifies that funds have been FOR STATE USE ONLY encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. $ 16A.15.) This Agreement is by and between the state of Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ( "State "). and the City of Hutchinson ( "Municipality "). WHEREAS, the Municipality desires the financial assistance of the State for maintenance and operation of the Hutchinson Municipal Airp= and WHEREAS, the State is willing and authorized by Minnesota Statutes Sections 360.015 and 360.305 to provide financial assistance to the Municipality for its airport. NOW. THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. This Agreement is effective upon execution by the Municipality and the State, and will remain in effect for the State fiscal years 2000 and 2001. �2. The Municipality agrees to the limits of State cost participation based upon a formula using runway infrastructure costs. The Municipality has reviewed the runway infrastructure costs assigned to its airport as provided by the State and agrees the costs accurately reflect the infrastructure in place. If paint striping of the airport is a part of this agreement as identified in the runway infrastructure costs, the State will contract for the periodic paint striping of the airport runways and taxiways. The Municipality agrees to the runway infrastructure deduct assigned as its share of airport paint striping. The Municipality agrees to cooperate with the marking operation. The Municipality will keep the landing area and the area around the lights mowed. The grass will be mowed at least 7 feet beyond the lights, and at no time will the grass exceed 6 inches in height on the landing area. If the airport is to remain operational during the winter months, the Municipality will keep at least one landing area, associated taxiway, and apron area cleared of snow and ice to the same priority as arterial roads. Snow banks will be kept down so that aircraft wings will clear them, and landing strip markers and/or lights will remain visible. 6. The airport must pass periodic inspections performed by a representative of the Office of Aeronautics for compliance with the rules of the Department of Transportation and for compliance with this Agreement. If the airport is not so maintained, then no reimbursement will be made hereunder. 9 i The State will reimburse the Municipality for 1 of the direct. actual maintenance and operation costs not reimbursed by any other source, not to exceed a l2g amount of $ 14,939.00 of State aid for each State fiscal year. 8. The State will reimburse the Municipality for 2/3 of all expenses associated with registration and attend to maintenance training functions, including the Minnesota Airport Symposium, not to exceed a saplemental amount of 5 300.00 of State aid for each State fiscal year. 9. The Municipality will submit a breakdown of its incurred costs to the Director, Office of Aeronautics, on forms supplied by the Office of Aeronautics. In any and all events, costs must be submitted to the Director, Office of Aeronautics, on or before August 1 for each State fiscal year ending June 30. No requests received after August 1 for the preceding State fiscal year will be honored by the State. The State reserves the right to reject items that may not be eligible for reimbursement, and reimbursement may be denied entirely if the airport is not properly maintained in accordance with this Agreement. 10. The Municipality has established a zoning authority for the airport, and such authority has completed, or is in the process of and will complete, with due diligence, an airport zoning ordinance in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 360.061 to 360.074. I. MUNICIPALITY By: Title: By: Title: MUNICIPALITY'S SIGNATURE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by. the of. (Name) (Title) 2. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Director, Office of Aeronautics Date: 3. Mn/DOT OFFICE OF CONTRACT MANAGEME10 By: Date: , 199 —, and (Name) (Title) (Name of Municipality) NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: Cl SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Hunters Ridge 2 Addition CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth hereinafter, between Kevin Compton, Carolyn Compton. and Dennis Kahl, fee owners, hereinafter called the "Subdivider "; and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal Corporation in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City"; WITNESSETH: • WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of property situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, which has been surveyed and platted as Hunters Ridge 2° Addition, and; WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires the Subdivider to make certain improvements in the subdivision; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall be responsible for all work associated with site preparation and grading. All areas within the final plat, but outside of the rights -of -way, shall be graded to within 0.5 feet of final grade to allow for proper drainage, and the installation of utilities. The rights -0f - -way shall be constructed to within 0.2 feet of approved grades. All unsuitable soils shall be removed and the remaining soils shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density. All work shall conform to the approved Site Grading Plan, and shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction on the site. 2. It is agreed and understood that natural gas or electric distribution mains and services will not be scheduled for installation until all provisions of paragraphs 1 of this section have been met. Staging of this work must be approved, and will only be allowed with the written approval from Hutchinson • Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone. HW;f W3 RVW 2• Add6wWar 7 - dr&W 827/99 _ C 3. trol necessary to protect the utilities, The Subdivider shall provide all turf establishment and erosion con street improvements and neighboring properties. The Subdivider shall complete all required pemvtting and provide all erosion control during site grading work, prior to infrastructure construction, necessary to meet local and state requirements. The entire site shall be planted with perennial rye grass, or other erosion control plantings, following completion of site grading. 4. It is understood and agreed that it shall be the Subdivider's responsibility to provide survey control points for all infrastructure and site construction. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall be responsible for maintaining the condition of the infastructure during building construction. The Subdivider shall be required to maintain and clean the roadways and storm sewers on a regular basis, and shall repair or replace any street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer or watermain infrastructure damaged by operations related to building construction on the site. The City reserves the right to complete this work and invoice the Subdivider after 10 days written notice of work to be completed. II. ASSESSMENTSaWROVEMENTS The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct lateral sanitary sewer mains and appurtenances, lateral watermain and appurtenances, sanitary sewer service leads. water service leads, lateral and trunk storm sewer and appurtenances, curb and gutter, street grading, street base, street surfacing, street signs and lighting, and appurtenances to serve the entire plat. The work shall meet all applicable local, state and federal regulations and construction standards. The City shall approve all construction documents and shall have overview and final approval of all infrastructure proposed to be turned over to the City. • 2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay an engineering and administrative fee to the City to cover expenses related to review, inspection and acceptance of privately installed infrastructure that is proposed to be turned over to the City of Hutchinson. This rate shall be as noted in the approved City policy at the time of construction. The current rate is 6% of construction cost, which shall only apply to those infrastructure items to become the property of the City. It is understood and agreed that the deferred assessments against the property (SA -221 and SA -230) shall be activated with interest for that portion of the parcel being platted, based on the acreage of the parcel. These costs shall be divided equally among the 5 lots within the plat, as noted in City policy. See Attachment for "Special Assessment Search Summary". The active assessment against the property (SA -285) shall be paid off in full prior to Building Permit issuance. 4. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall not be required to pay Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain connection fees due to previous assessments for this work covered in paragraph 3 immediately above. III OTHER FEES CHARGES AND DEDICATIONS It is understood and agreed, that a Parks and Playground Contribution will be made to the City. Current City policy calls for a contribution of $175 /unit based on 1999 rates. It is recommended that HwftS RNpe Y nddbyWape 2 - drated 927/99 this contribution may be made in a lump sum prior to construction at the current rate. S 3. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay a fee of $800 per unit as a municipal electric service access charge, as noted by agreements with McLeod Cooperative Power Association (Coop). These fees shall be collected with the building permit for all properties, unless otherwise noted in the agreement with McLeod Cooperative Power Association. The checks shall be made out directly to the AMcLeod Cooperative Power Association. 3. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall, prior to installation of utilities, pay connection fees for Electric and Gas Service to Hutchinson Utilities for all units to be served in the final plat. These costs for single - family home units are $150 for 100 -amp service or $200 /unit for 200 -amp Electric Service, and $150 /unit for Gas Service or as in effect with Hutchinson Utilities at the time of development. These fees include the standard connection to each house, and include required meters. Services larger than the standard residential sizes will be at an additional cost. 4. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay all costs associated with installing streetlights to serve the Subdivision. Streetlights on public right -of -way will be installed by the City at current spacing standards and will be maintained and operated by the City after installation. The City, based on the invoice from Hutchinson Utilities, shall invoice the cost for this installation to the Subdivider. W. GENERAL • 1. It is understood and agreed that sewer, water, and gravel base will be installed by December of 2000. The base bituminous must be installed and approved prior to any certificates of occupancy for new homes being issued (excluding Lot 1, Block 2). The wear course must be installed by August of 2001. 2. It is understood and agreed that all local, state and federal permits required to be obtained for the development shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider. 3. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. 4. It is understood and agreed that the City shall record this agreement at the McLeod County Recorder's Office or McLeod County Registrar of Titles Office, and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is recorded and a certified copy of this agreement is provided to the City. The Subdivider shall pay all costs associated with said recording. 0 FkNIWS RXO 2- AdaVW9P 3- ftW 07199 SIGNATURES SUBDIVIDER:. Signature Name (Print) Title STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999, by of COUNTY OF Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires SUBDIVIDER: . Signature STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SUBDIVIDER:. Signature STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Name (Print) Title The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999. by Of Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires Name (Print) Title The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999, by Of Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires [ J L_J Ffiarsta FWP 2- AdOWWOP 4 - dr&W 92798 APPROVED BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL THE _ DAY OF 0 19_ CITY OF HUTCHINSON: MARLIN TORGERSON, MAYOR STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _day of 1999, by Mariin Torgetson, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works Citv of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 320 - 234 -4209 Hwfts Wdp 2- AdOMPOpe 5 - dmfied 927M SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT Walnut Ridge Estates Plat 2 CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth hereinafter, between Paul S. Betker, fee owner, hereinafter called the "Subdivider "; , a Minnesota corporation, mortgagee; and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal Corporation in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of property situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, which has been surveyed and platted as Walnut Ridge Estates Plat 2, and; WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires the Subdivider to make certain improvements in the subdivision; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall be responsible for all work associated with site preparation and grading. All areas within the final plat, but outside of the rights -of -way, shall be graded to within 0.5 feet of final grade to allow for proper drainage, and the installation of utilities. The rights -of -way shall be constructed to within 0.2 feet of approved grades. All unsuitable soils shall be removed and the remaining soils shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density. All work shall conform to the approved Site Grading Plan, and shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction on the site. 2. It is agreed and understood that natural gas or electric distribution mains and services will not be scheduled for installation until all provisions of paragraphs 1 of this section have been met. Staging of this work must be approved, and will only be allowed with the written approval from Hutchinson Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone. 3. The Subdivider shall provide all turf establishment and erosion control necessary to protect the utilities, street improvements and neighboring properties. The Subdivider shall complete all required permitting watm,r RldW ESMW PW 29ap r -aeeea 90% — and provide all erosion control during site grading work, prior to infrastructure construction, necessary to meet local and state requirements. The entire site shall be planted with perennial rye grass, or other erosion control plantings, following completion of site grading. 4. It is understood and agreed that it shall be the Subdivider's responsibility to provide survey control points for all infrastructure and site construction. 5. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall be responsible for maintaining the condition of the infrastructure during building construction. The Subdivider shall be required to maintain and clean the roadways and storm sewer; on a regular basis, and shall repair or replace any street, storm sewer, sanitary sewer or watermain infrastructure damaged by operations related to building construction on the site. The City reserves the right to complete this work and invoice the Subdivider after 10 days written notice of work to be completed. 11. ASSESSMENTWWROVEMENTS The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct lateral sanitary sewer mains and appurtenances, lateral watermain and appurtenances, sanitary sewer service leads, water service leads, lateral and trunk storm sewer and appurtenances, curb and gutter, street grading, street base, street surfacing, street signs and lighting, and appurtenances to serve the entire plat. The work shall meet all applicable local, state and federal regulations and construction standards. The City shall approve all construction documents and shall have overview and final approval of all infrastructure proposed to be turned over to the City. 2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay an engineering and administrative fee to the • City to cover expenses related to review, inspection and acceptance of privately installed infrastructure that is proposed to be turned over to the City of Hutchinson. This rate shall be as noted in the approved City policy at the time of construction. The current rate is 6% of construction cost, which shall only apply to those infrastructure items to become the property of the City. 3. It is understood and agreed that the deferred assessments against the property (SA -290 from 1994, $12,262.33 original principle) shall be activated with interest and divided equally among the 14 lots within the plat, as noted in City policy. 4. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain connection fees. These fees will compensate the City for improvements required to provide Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain access to the plat property boundary. This fee shall be collected in a lump sum prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. The rates for 1999 will be $550 per unit for Sanitary Sewer and $325 per unit for Watermain. With specific approval of the Planning Director these fees may be collected at the time of building permit issuance. If rates increase prior to collection, the rate in place at the time of payment will apply. III. OTHER FEES, CHARGES AND DEDICATIONS Pi WWU RMps Edda Pig 2Peps 2 - 6 9998 • 1. It is understood and agreed, that a Parks and Playground Contribution will be made to the City. Current City policy calls for a contribution of $175 /unit based on 1999 rates. It is recommended that this contribution may be made in a lump sum prior to construction at the current rate, which relates to a total cost of $2,450. 2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall, prior to installation of utilities, pay connection fees for Electric and Gas Service to Hutchinson Utilities for all units to be served in the final plat. These costs for single - family home units are $150 for 100 -amp service or $200 /unit for 200 -amp Electric Service, and $150 /unit for Gas Service or as in effect with Hutchinson Utilities at the time of development. These fees include the standard connection to each house, and include required meters. Services larger than the standard residential sizes will be at an additional cost. It is understood and agreed that all costs associated with installing streetlights to serve the Subdivision shall be paid by the Subdivider. Streetlights on public right -of -way will be installed by the City at current spacing standards and will be maintained and operated by the City after installation. The cost for this installation shall be invoiced to the Subdivider by the City, based on the invoice from Hutchinson Utilities. V. GENERAL 1. It is understood and agreed that all local, state and federal permits required to be obtained for the development shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider. . 2. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. It is understood and agreed that the City shall record this agreement at the McLeod County Recorder's Office or McLeod County Registrar of Titles Office, and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is recorded and a certified copy of this agreement is provided to the City. The Subdivider shall pay all costs associated with said recording. SIGNATURES SUBDIVIDER:. Signature STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Name (Print) Title The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 1999, by Paul S. Betker, fee owner Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires MORTAGEE: • ftW Ridge EsWw Plat 2Page 3 -drabd 9/%W Signature Name (Print) Title • STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999, by of COUNTY OF Notary Public. County, Minnesota My Commission Expires APPROVED BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL THE _ DAY OF ' 19 CITY OF HUTCHINSON: MARLIN TORGERSON, MAYOR STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999, by Marlin Torgersom Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson. MN 55350 -2522 320- 234 -4209 • • Wa1M RiVe ESMW Ptet 2Pap 4 - draW MW P 0 �Url�nsun jJixb1ir ° Xibrarg 50 Hassan Street South Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 C'�C4L4�� i / /9 RECEPIED OCT 12 1999 CITY OF HUTCHIlyso(y 74 4, 4 Memorandum 7o: Mayor & City Council CC: Ken Merrill, Finance Director Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator From: Marilyn J. Swanson, Administrative Secretary Date: October 12, 1999 Re: LICENSES FOR CUB FOODS Since Cub Foods will be opening on November 1, 1999, the new owner (Cobom's, Inc., formerly CashWise) has requested tobacco and "off sale" non - intoxicating malt liquor licenses for this establishment. Please note that I pro -rated the charge for these • two licenses. Attached are the application forms for your consideration and approval. Attachments • 1 btate of Ainntoota, . . ...... County A ... ...... I dppiioadtmr No....._.. Application for License to Sell Cigarettes at Retail AW Ai. V nt c , the U14 C D._...._._..._... .--..Of ------- gL 411 The und#rsiimd . 1.0.. 2 in the county of ..... .......... ..... W IOAA ...... St o f jfjn izzRzBr arizz... APPLIC-1 TION FOR LrCZXSB to be isrumad to sell cigarettes and cilarsas papers and wrappm at mfta 1320 Hwy 15 South, . .............. in ........ . said county and &tat$ for the term of L cnn 'bs�Gusinj ................. ............. 19.99 ....., Subject to the Imos Of the State of Aftawwoft and Um ordinances and rejuUttions of said ...... xktchii thereto, and herewith, deposit $....... ....% .... ........... ..... in payment of the f" therefor. DAM Coborn's, Incorporated g ._._._ - - --- - ------ - ---------- ---- - ---- ----- -- ---------- -- - ----- - 0 Nam /address change 41 RETAIL "OFF SALE" $esovm *tote of Allnegata, cmmv of.--.- Llqt To the ..... ....... C.i.t.Y.. ................ ....... of the ........... �!.�Y ..................... d ....... !!O�Ps99 ............ .................................. ............................... ..........................s er Minnesota: . Coborn's,__jaqor hereby appl-I tS--for a Ltoones for Ow tom of ..... _balance pL_yeaLrLO _29�O ( M2�1, 266 .__ 9_�renew4l date) from 10.2 to sell In Ori&W Pack Only, 'Non- Intoxicating Malt Liquors, the same are d6Awd by law, for ome nbpo" "Oil' Lkow owlaim Promfoom (A th# .. . . ....... ... . ......... CITY 11UTCHINSON ddsorlbed as foUaw to-wU . ...... - ------ Coborn's, incorporated dba Cub Foods 1320 Hwy 15 South Hutchinson, MN 56350 • at wh" jetmes, said V" busimess ef—.— store aid to duo md rvpwm*-LA&d mi -s as Jolla": 2-ha said appusoma ..... Ls-L ------ the URL&d Sea m; of pond Mona ohar"ter and repao, and ha. Al-aMaiaA' ale of 21 years; ....... of as "JabUAVem* for Wh" the UMMAN WW be "CIA64 if " aPPUOMUM is JrGM"& Thal so" appU&W..-maks-S-" smWom"on PwmaM and sub/ea to aU the kvm of Ow Mate of ML a" As w4laamm and rmjuWtae of &Urvgw wh" an hereby made a pars Awwf, and hereby airms.-L-to obw and obey she saws: 1mw r rr m W. • b"m .W.V.* Back appUsaa4 turAer asads, Ojos As is and mw Um holder of, mor has 10 mods appUMUM for, nor does he LxAmd to make appUou4m for a Yederal ROAU D*G•S 8PMW towe damp for the Sale of intoxtoatinj Uquor. CA"% 0 Coborn's, Incorporated J it 9", Don P.Mwrl r f- ... St. Cloud, MN � - - sPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 (15:51) page 1 1980 TIDS --------------------------- BACHMAN'S --- ---------- -- --- TREES /SHRUBS - - - - -- - - $329.83 --- - - - - -- • ELKS LODGE #2427 WILSONS NORTH WEST NURSERY PRINCIPAL PAYMENT INC TREES, =HRUBS $10,000.00 $2,376.20 < *> $12,706.03* 1998 IMPR. CONST ARNOLD & MCDOWELL PROFESS SERV -KUECH /ISLAND VIEW $30.00 REINER CONTRACTING L9/98 EST #2 $112,687.21 < *> $112,717.21* 1999 IMPR_ CONST BRAUN INTERTEC CORP PROFESS SERV -FIRE TRAIN TOWER $2,529.25 DUININCK BROS INC. L3/99 EST # 3 $876,449.79 R & R EXCAVATING L13/99 EST 42 $21,134.75 WM MUELLER & SONS L9/99 EST #5 $80,625.95 < > $980,739.74+ AIRPORT RENOVAT. GOPHER STATE CONTRACTORS AIRPORT CONST -EST #4 $95,872.10 HUTCHINSON TEL CO MATERIALS, LABOR- AIRPORT CONST $2,474.00 MATHIOWETZ CONSTRUCTION AIRPORT CONST -EST #4 $192,597.21 TKDA PROFESS SERV- AIRPORT CONST $28,815.93 < > $319,759.24+ .::'i.',AL GARAGE BRANDON TIRE CO TIRES, TUBES, MOUNT /DISMNT $1,410.87 - CARQUEST AUTO PARTS SHOP SUPPLIES $139.37 CHRISTENSEN REPAIR SHARPEN BLADE $40.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON OCT MEDICAL $432.09 CROW RIVER AUTO LABOR $344.42 CROW RIVER GLASS WINDSHIELD, LABOR, MATERIALS $478.35 FORTIS BENEFITS OCT LTD $21.45 G & K SERVICES TOWELS $145.19 GARD SPECIALISTS CUTOFF WHEEL, GARDSERT $241.17 HARPEL BROS.INC LOW HOSE $7.99 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE TUIT -K WICHTERMAN, E BARKEIM $90.00 • HOLT MOTORS INC PARTS $48.62 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE SHOP SUPPLIES $530.52 L & P SUPPLY CO HUB $330.11 MN MUTUAL LIFE OCT LIFE $7.56 OLSONS LOCKSMITH LABOR, SERVICE, IGNIT $82.85 PENSKE AUTO CENTER OIL CHANGE $32.16 RUNNING'S SUPPLY CHAIN, HOOKS $109.19 SCHMELING OIL CO OIL $2,00 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP EXTENSIONS, SHIPPING /HAND $69.11 ST.JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC BRACKET, HANDLE, LATCH $91.46 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO OPERATING SUPPLIES $48.73 TWO WAY COMM INC MATERIALS, LABOR $49.90 US POSTAL SERVICE SEPT POSTAGE $10.23 < > $4,763.34* GENERAL FUND AAGARD WEST OCT SERVICE $1,528.61 ABC SEAMLESS SIDING CO RELOCATE DOWNSPOUTS $35.00 AMCON BLOCK SPLASH BLOCK $38.34 AMERICAN BOTTLING CO, THE SEPT POP PURCHASE $92.20 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL SEPT COMPENSATION $7,066.00 BAUERLY BROS INC. COUPLER, TEE $95.40 BAUMETZ, BONNIE REIMB- MILEAGE $40.30 BENNETT OFFICE SUP. SERVICE CONTRACT $141.83 BERNICKS PEPSI COLA SEPT POP PURCHASE $92.40 BRAND, JUDY SWIM LESSONS INSTRUCTION $250.00 BRINKMAN, DONNA REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $12.00 BROWN, JANET REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE $64.33 BRY -AIR BED INDEX TIMER W /SPROCKET $156.05 BT OFFICE PRODUCTS PENCILS, PENS, MARKERS, CALEND $134.88 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS PC -TP CARD $943.07 CAMERA SHOP REPRINTS $63.50 CANON, LINDA REFUND- COACHING FLAG FOOTBALL $20.00 CAP-RON NET COMPANY VOLLEYBALL NETS $361.46 CASH WISE APPLES, ETC $156.01 • CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD LABELS, PROTECTOR, FOLDERS $230.02 CENTRAL GARAGE SEPT REPAIRS $11,157.22 CHALUPSKY, DODIE REFUND SR TOUR $38.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON AUGUST LODGING TAX $35,220.20 CLARK, DWIGHT REFUND VOLLEYBALL DEPOSIT $102.00 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 X15:51) page 42 -- - - - - -_ ----- -- -------------- - - - - -- GENERAL FUND COAST TO COAST _ _ -___ HOSEREEL, SCREWS $482.12 -_ CROW RIVER AREA QUALITY COUNCI SEPTEMBER SESSION $80.00 CROW RIVER GLASS PAINT $23.96 • CROW RIVER VET CLINIC SEPT SERVICES $383.93 DAAK REFRIGERATION REPAIRS TO OVEN $155.47 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CONNECT & OPERATIONS CHARGES $390.00 DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DNR FEES TO STATE $771.00 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY EXEMPTION $30.00 DIAMOND 5 CONSTRUCTION STUMP REMOVAL $1,339.80 DOMINO'S PIZZA PIZZAS, POP $31.55 DONALD SITZ CUSTOM FARMING SER SEPT MOWING $332.50 ED DAVIS BUS MACH TRANSPARENCIES $81.86 EWING, BRENDA REIMB- MILEAGE $17.37 FABRICARE CLEANERS DRY CLEAN JACKET $7.00 FOO, MELISSA REFUND - OVERPAID SKATE LESSONS $5.00 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS FABRIC TAPE $34.65 FORTIS BENEFITS OCT LTD $1,733.84 FREUND, RANDY REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $20.00 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS $835.60 GARBERG, MARCIA REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $40.00 GEB ELECTRICAL INC ADD RECEPTICLE TO WORK STATION $150.00 GOODWATER, LEON REFUND - CANCELLED GYMNASTICS $13.00 GRAY, JEAN REIMB- MEALS, LODGING $105.25 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING RECYCLING CHARGES $200.20 GRINA, LISA REIMB- FOOTWEAR $50.00 HALI -BRITE INC RISER $80.36 HANSEN DEMOLITION LANDFILL ROBERTS PARK SCRAP $36.25 HAVE TREES WILL TRAVEL RELOCATE TREES $240.00 HCVN -TV COPY PROGRAMS $6,962.18 HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT PANT, COAT, BATTERY $36.21 HENKE, MARY REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE, LODGING $199.81 HENSEN, MARK REIMB -MEALS, MILEAGE $115.94 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON TISSUE, TOWELS $481.97 HOEFT, JUDY REFUND- CANCELLED GYMNASTICS $13.00 HUTCH CONVENTION & AUGUST LODGING TAX $7,030.49 HUTCH COOP CENEX CHEMICALS $806.74 HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY EXTINGUISHER $37.71 HUTCH FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSC. 1999 BUDGET FUNDING $72,978.00 • HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO REPLACE SEWAGE EJECT PUMPS $2,600.00 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE HEP B VACCINATIONS $60.00 HUTCHINSON LEADER ADS $1,968.66 HUTCHINSON TEL CO OCT SERVICE $7,983.99 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES BULBS $6,203.47 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE LOCK $68.19 IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES UNIT RENTAL & REMOVAL -RTRY PK $37.80 IND.SCHOOL DIST. #423 CROW RIVER YOUTH ORCHESTRA $805.00 INTOXIMETERS INC MOUTHPIECES $106.50 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT BADGE HOLDERS, NAME PLATE $835.55 JONES, DIANE OPEN SR CENTER $50.00 K MART YEW UPRIGHT $119.32 KILIAN, AMY REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE $228.28 KOESNICK, GALE REFUND -SKATE LESSONS $45.00 KRUSSOW, DON FOLDERS FOR CODE BOOKS $100.00 L & _ SUPPLY CO PRIMER BULB $2.11 LAKES GAS CO. FUEL, LABOR $248.56 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES QTR 1 & 2 PAYMENT $64,919.50 LOGIS AUG SERVICE $6,408.38 MADSON, LINDA REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $20.00 MADSON, STEVEN REIMB- MEALS, LODGING, PARKING $305.06 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 1999 ASSESSMENT FEE $31,315.00 MERRILL, KENNETH B. REIMB - MILEAGE, PHONE $95.11 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY VOLLEYBALLS $165.82 MID -MN HOT MIX INC IN FINES $595.69 MIDWEST FORENSIC PATHOLOGY SLIDE REPRINTS $373.82 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. OCT SERVICE $1,144.13 MINDSHARP ACCESS 97 TRAINING $1,200.00 MINI BIFF UNIT RENTAL -PARK & ARMORY $79.88 MINN BLUE DIGITAL -A LINEAR FOOT CHARGE $8.83 MN COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSC CODE BOOKS $279.61 MN MUTUAL LIFE OCT LIFE - COBRA - DOSTAL $585.48 MONAHAN, DAN TOURNAMENT WORKER $21.00 MORE 4 SUPPLIES $131.72 • MPPOA REG -JACOB MAY $225.00 MR. MOVIES VIDEO RENTAL $6.36 MUELLER, LISA REIMB - FOOTWEAR $100.00 NASS, MERLIN REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $28.00 _OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 (15:51) page 3 - -___ GENERAL FUND __ - - - - -_ _ NELSON, KAY _ ___ REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED ___ $20.00 • NO STATES SUPPLY INC OGLESBY, KIMBERLY ROUND BAST FILE REFUND -CLASS CANCELLED $3.98 $12.00 OLD LOG THEATRE SR TOUR -45 + 2 TICKETS $943.00 OLSONS LOCKSMITH KEYS $6.39 PINKERTON SERVICES GROUP DRUG & ALCOHOL TESTING $273.60 PIONEER BLACK & YELLOW PAINT $436.13 PLAMANN, ROGER 30 BALES STRAW $30.00 PLATH, SUE BATTERIES $104.60 POPP ELECTRICAL INC MATERIALS, LABOR- GARAGE DOORS $1,000.62 QUADE ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL WIRING - INVEST OFF $2,527.04 R. J. FALK COMPANY PARTS $110.23 RDJ SPECIALTIES PRINTED PENS $355.43 RESPOND SYSTEMS SAFETY SUPPLIES $325.33 RIDER ??NNETT EGAN & ARUNDEL PROFESS SERV- GENERAL SERVICES $101.50 RISS, CLARISSA REFUND GYMNASTICS $42.00 RUNNING'S SUPPLY PAINTING SUPPLIES $463.04 SHOE INN, THE REPAIR HOLDERS $25.00 SHOPKO AUDIO 4 PK $22.60 SHRED -IT SHREDDING SERVICE $54.95 SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY EQUIPMENT RENTAL $479.25 ST. PAUL RADISSON LODGING - BRENDA EWING $201.14 ST. PAUL STAMP WORKS ANIMAL LICENSE TAGS $78.93 STANDARD PRINTING ENVELOPES $29.89 STERTZ, SANDY REFUND - OVERPAID VOLLEYBALL $31.00 SUBWAY PORTION PLATTER, CHIPS $30.78 Sti7 - - .IOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $35.63 TEMPLETON INC EMPLOYER CONTRIS SEPT 1999 $303.42 TOWN & COUNTRY WESTERN OUTLET REPAIR PANTS $20.00 TRAIL TV & RADIO SHACK PARTS & LABOR- REPAIR OPTIC EYE $200.00 TRANSICARD FUEL $21.79 TRAVEL EASY TOURS SR TOUR -25 + 2 TICKETS $250.00 TRI CO WATER COND WATER BOTTLES $244.27 TWO WAY COMM INC SEPT PAGER SERVICE $386.60 UNITED BLDG CENTERS COATED SINKERS $88.99 US OFFICE PRODUCTS LABELS $339.74 • US POSTAL SERVICE US WEST COMMUN SEPT POSTAGE OCTOBER SERVICE $1,120.67 $166.20 WAL -MART TOOLBOX, RIBBON, SCISSOR $195.03 WISCHNACK, JULIE REIMB- MILEAGE, LODGING $160.25 WITTE SOD SOD DELIVERED, SOD PICKED UP $232.20 WOODS PAINTING CENTER PAINT $31.73 $295,347.35 - HUTCH COW DEV.0 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS PAGEMAKER PLUS $265.72 CITY OF HUTCHINSON OCT MEDICAL $432.09 FORTIS BENEFITS OCT LTD $27.24 HUTCHINSON LEADER CARDS $29.33 HUTCHINSON TEL CO OCT SERVICE $136.49 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. OCT CREDIT - $50.00 MN MUTUAL LIFE OCT LIFE $9.66 MORE 4 POP, ICE $3.06 SUBWAY BOX LUNCHES $47.82 US POSTAL SERVICE SEPT POSTAGE $50.34 < -' $951.75 - HUTCH TRANS FAC. BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS HP INKJET CARTRIDGE $144.90 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE FLOURESCENT WORK LIGHT $99.00 CASH WISE PLATES, CUPS $9.42 CENTRAL GARAGE SEPT REPAIRS $25.60 CITY OF HUTCHINSON SEPT WATER /SEWER $386.44 EBERT & HINSON FIRE PROTECTION SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSPECT $195.00 G & K SERVICES TOWELS $305.79 HUTCH COOP CENEX SUPER UNLEADED FUEL $8,168.95 HUTCHINSON TEL CO OCT SERVICE $438.84 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES SEPT UTILITY $1,452.63 MORE 4 BAKERY $9.98 RUNNING'S SUPPLY THERMOS $19.17 SCHMELING OIL CO 3/4" BREAKAWAY $39.40 • SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $35.63 US POSTAL SERVICE SEPT POSTAGE $11.33 WAL -MART 50 LINE $5.28 ` -' $11,347.36+ OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 (15:51) gage _-- - - - -__ LIQUOR STORE ------------ --- ----- - - - - -- AAGARD WEST _ -___ OCTOBER SERVICE _ $46.80 BERNICKS PEPSI COLA SEPT POP PURCHASE $107.60 C & L DISTRIBUTING SEPT BEER CREDIT $6,676.85 • CARR FLOWERS PLANT -V MENZE $28.63 CITY OF HUTCHINSON SEPT FUEL $1,065.46 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. SEPT WINE $4,257.65 FORTIS BENEFITS OCT LTD $40.41 GRIGGS COOPER & CO SEPT LIQUOR $4,100.29 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE SEPT BEER PURCHASE $1,290.70 HENRYS FOODS INC SEPT TOBACCO PURCHASE $451.19 HUTCHINSON TEL CO OCT ADVERTISE $189.32 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES SEPT UTILITY $1,323.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. SEPT WINE $15,016.76 JORDON BEVERAGE INC. SEPT BEER $1,666.60 K D U Z SEPTEMBER RADIO ADS $89.00 KKLN SEPT RADIO ADS $110.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES QTR 1 & 2 PAYMENT $532.00 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC SEPT BEER $1,901.55 LUNDHOLM, LORI CLEAN WINDOWS $42.60 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. OCT SERVICE -$3.46 MN MUTUAL LIFE OCT LIFE $14.49 MORE 4 GRAPE VINE $194.73 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. SEPT LIQUOR $2,609.27 STANDARD PRINTING KEG REGISTRATIONS $227.42 TRI CO WATER COND WATER BOTTLES $42.18 US POSTAL SERVICE SEPT POSTAGE $133.21 VIKING COCA COLA SEPT POP PURCHASE $268.30 WINE MERCHANTS INC SEPT WINE $437.30 c +> $42,859.89* PAYROLL FUND AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $690.00 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $27.88 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $100.00 H.R.L.A.P.R. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $177.74 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $2,651.15 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE MANDATORY CHILD SUPPORT 10/2 $162.69 PERA LIFE INS CO. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $120.00 • PERA- D.C.P. EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $52.02 PRUDENTIAL EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $75.00 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $30.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $16,456.09 TEMPLETON INC EE CONTRIB 10 /2/99 $250.00 WADELL & REED EE CONTRIB 10/2/99 $150.00 e c > $20,942.77* RURAL F. D. CITY OF HUTCHINSON SEPT FUEL $71.58 HUTCH FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSC. 1999 BUDGETED FUNDING $5,810.00 SCHRAMM, STEVE QTR 3 RURAL MILEAGE $18.53 STEELE, DAN QTR 3 RURAL MILEAGE $33.48 c > $5,933.59• WATER /SEWER FUND AAGARD WEST SEPT PICKUP $30,357.42 AM.WATER WORKS ASSN REG -DICK EBERT $50.00 BENNETT OFFICE SUP. COPIER READINGS $15.00 CENTRAL GARAGE SEPT REPAIRS $1,192.19 CITY OF HUTCHINSON SEPT FUEL $5,840.39 COAST TO COAST SUPPLIES $402.34 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY EXEMPTION $10.00 DEVRIES, RANDY REIMB- AIRLINE TICKET $105.00 FORTIS BENEFITS OCT LTD $256.35 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE REPAIR KIT, LABOR, OUTPUT HUG $3,354.81 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP HYDRO ACID $809.42 HENRY & ASSOCIATES BLUE MARKING PAINT $67.06 HUTCH COOP CENEX CENEX 40A $20.00 HUTCHINSON LEADER HW ADS $53.20 HUTCHINSON TEL CO OCT SERVICE $806.76 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES SEPT UTILITY $23,241.06 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE GREASE $67.02 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES QTR 1 & 2 PAYMENT $7,820.00 LOGIS AUG SERVICE $3,249.48 LTP ENTERPRISES MATERIALS, LABOR $2,712.66 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. OCT SERVICE $28.47 MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER RENTAL 10/1 -12/31 $25.88 5PEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 (15:51) page 5 WATER /SEWER __ -------------------------------- FUND MN MUTUAL LIFE — ------------- OCT LIFE — ------- $90.51 - - -- MN VALLEY TESTING LAB LAB TESTS $1,156.36 • MUNITECH INC TEST WATER METER $200.00 NAGY, RICHARD REIMB - MILEAGE, LODGING 5474.20 PELLINEN, WILLARD SURVEY -CROW RIVER FLOODWAY 5675.00 RUNNING'S SUPPLY FLASHLIGHTS, HDWE, ETC $267.66 SERCO LABORATORIES WATER QUALITY REPORT $2,446.25 SKB ENVIRONMENTAL WINDROW TURNER $10,600.00 US FILTER /WATERPRO METER PARTS $188.74 US POSTAL SERVICE SEPT POSTAGE $1,071.22 USA WASTE SERVICES INC LOADS 9/1/99 - 9/17/99 $7,173.03 WELCOME NEIGHBOR SEPT LISTING $60.00 <`' $104,887.48* $1,912,955.75* • • El i IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT 12 -OCT -1999 (15:48) page 1 _______ GENERAL FUND _______________________________ DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES _________________ DNR REG FEES ______________ $719.00 KLOSS, TOM TUITION REIMBURSEMENT $236.70 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORK COMP QTR 4 $29,372.98 < *> $30,328.68* HUTCH TRANS FAC. LEAGUE OF MN CITIES DEDUCTIBLE BILLINGS $257.46 < *> $257.46* LIQUOR STORE CITY OF HUTCHINSON LOTTERY $246.26 HYATT REGENCY MINNEAPOLIS LODGING FOR EXPO $745.92 KAARG, VAN TAXI SERVICE $150.00 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORK COMP QTR 4 $470.10 MIDWEST EXPO 10 REGISTRATIONS $690.00 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. SEPT WINE $1,957.42 WEGNER,NEIL PARKING FOR EXPO $60.00 < *> $4,319.70* PAYROLL FUND AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. EE CONTRIB 9/18 $690.00 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. EE CONTRIB 9/18 $100.00 < *> $790.00* .:R /SEWER FUND LEAGUE OF MN CITIES WORKMAN COMP QTR 4 $2,204.27 SWANA REG- R.DEVRIES $460.00 < *> $2,664.27* $38,360.11* El RECEIVED 1�n�rCRow RIVER Habitat for Humanity OU A -1999 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 35 North Mein Street • Hutchinson, MN 55350 • Telephone (320)587 -8888 10/7/99 Mayor Marlin Torgerson Hutchinson City Council 11 I Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Marlin and members of the Hutchinson City Council, FOR YOuR INEMW Crow River Habitat for Humanity, Inc. wishes to express its appreciation for waiving the • building and plumbing permit fees at the Lynn Road construction site. Each of these contributions help keep the cost of the houses as low as possible. This in turn is helpful in meeting the goal of making more affordable housing available in the McLeod county area. Because Hutchinson is growing rapidly, it stands to reason that this is the fourth house being built by CRHFH here. Of the two other houses built, one was built in Glencoe and the other was completed this past summer in Stewart. In the year 2000 a house will be built in Brownton near the high school where McLeod West trades class students will be able to help with the construction. Thank you again for the assistance you have provided. If you have any questions please call the office at (320) 587 -8868 or stop at the new office location at 34 Main St. N. Thank you also to the streets department for completing the beautiful new entrance from the alley which was constructed this summer. Sincerely, i 4 Mavis V. Schwanke, treasurer cc: Hutchinson Streets Department E Serving McLeod County and the Surrounding Areas 0 Hutchinson Fire Department Monthly Council Update for September 1999 The fire department responded to 36 calls for service in September, this is the breakdown of those calls: City Calls: Residential 3 Commercial / Industrial 7 Multi- Family 7 School Type 2 Rescue 1 Haz- Material 2 Vehicle 2 Grass Type 1 Carbon Monoxide 1 Rural Calls: • Residential I Rescue 3 Medicals 5 Haz- Material 1 Training / Meetings: Pumper Drill SCBA Maintenance Liquid Propane Live burn Incident Command for the Firefighter County Haz -Mat Team Training on Decontamination 0 EMPLOYEE SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 16.1999 Members Present: Randy Starke, Connie Maki, John Arlt, Keith Messner, and Jo Runke. Brenda Ewing and Ken Merrill arrived during the meeting. Members absent: Dick Ebert, Quentin Larson, John Olson, Mark Larson, Mark Weis, David Telecky and Mary Haugen. 1. August minutes were approved. 2. Safetv Committee Booth at Health Fair —We will be having a booth at the Health Fair in November. Discussion was held on what we wanted to give as door prizes. It was decided to purchase 1 CO2 detector, 3 smoke detectors and 1 fire extinguisher as the large prizes and order flashlight key chains for everyone. Connie Maki will order the prizes and make up a work schedule for the booth. Each committee member and their alternate will cover a half -hour shift at the booth. 3. There were 3 injuries reported in the past month. Brenda stressed the need to report injuries promptly. i 4. First Aid Training will be offered October 12` and October 14` This will be a two-hour session. Brad Emans will arrange for an instructor. 5. CPR Training will be held September 21" and September 23` It is the recommendation of the Safety Committee that employees attend each year. It will include infant, child and adult instructions. 6. Forklift training - Ken Wichterman is a certified trainer. The street department has completed training and testing. Additional training/testing is being scheduled. Reminder that any employee who operates a skidsteer or a loader is required to take this training. 7. Respond First Aid supplies — It appears that they are going to some of the city building on an ongoing basis. Randy S. will contact the representative and get all city facilities on a regular scheduled stop. 8. Safety Badges —Nothing new to report. As stated before the person from the Police Department who will be handling the safety badges is out for an extended period of time. The software has been purchased and a draft has been done of the procedural policy. 9. Reminders: No smoking in City vehicles. Wear your seat belts. Conduct inter - department safety meetings. 0 10. Next meeting will be October 14, 1999 at 10:00 A.M. City Center Main Conference Room. 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON SOP -98 LIQUOR 1 2,013 2 1,674 3 2,934 4 4,454 5 5,194 7 HOLIDAY 6 2,282 9 1,996 10 1,958 11 3,770 12 3,977 14 1,887 15 1,677 16 2,035 17 1,979 16 3, 97 3 19 3,623 21 1,314 22 1,801 23 1,592 24 1,834 25 3,788 26 3,837 28 1,516 29 1,400 30 1,918 7,312 64,626 91 TOTAL 57,295 %OF SALE 30 SALES INC OR DEC BEER WINE _______ _________ 2,905 533 2,990 385 4,774 665 10,300 1,605 11,667 1,989 3,296 2,759 4,010 8,009 8,033 2,646 2,501 3,302 4,161 8,360 7,613 2,100 2,573 2,751 3,315 7,030 7,915 2,728 2,622 2, 748 121,210 99,033 56 539 476 710 1,223 1,236 498 301 503 819 1,197 1, 357 341 594 670 790 1,241 1,517 479 444 565 20,677 20,191 30 30,611 TOTAL MISC. _________________ TOTAL BY WEEK 232 __________ 5,683 197 5,246 497 8,860 653 17,012 987 19,837 _____ 56,638 __________ 0 254 6,373 193 5,424 WINE 460 7,138 BY WEEK __________ 628 13,710 __________ 3,720 767 14,013 6,767 2 46,658 241 5,272 409 215 4,694 3 339 6,179 1,849 333 7,312 804 14,334 11,542 014 13,607 19,234 51,398 139 3,894 300 5,268 7 318 5,331 656 211 6,150 654 12,713 2,552 716 13,985 5,474 9 41,341 241 4,964 370 208 4,674 10 246 5,477 1,456 560 13,793 15,115 10,637 3,432 217,150 10,020 674 186,539 5 100 16 4 0 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON SEPTEMBER 1999 _____ __ _______ __________ __________________ TOTAL LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL _________ BY WEEK __________ __________ 1 _________ 2,237 __________ 3,720 __________________ 592 216 6,767 2 2,548 5,909 824 409 9,690 3 5,461 11,122 1,849 630 19,062 4 5,271 11,542 1,725 696 19,234 54,753 7 1,882 3,067 656 245 5,850 8 2,249 2,552 466 207 5,474 9 2,171 3,632 972 370 7,145 10 4,278 7,499 1,456 560 13,793 11 3,432 7,932 1,506 674 13,546 45,808 13 1,699 3,769 832 248 6,548 14 1,647 2,524 536 217 4,924 15 1,733 2,986 695 245 5,659 16 2,297 4,157 1,020 334 7,808 17 4,548 7,743 1,115 493 13,899 18 3,640 8,098 1,892 665 14,295 53,133 20 1,411 2,700 492 178 4,781 21 1,801 2,846 856 166 5,669 22 2,111 3,246 613 230 6,400 23 1,931 4,092 731 224 6,978 24 3,993 8,019 1,731 449 14,192 25 4,158 8,650 1,372 624 14,804 52,824 27 '1,508 2,853 787 289 5,437 28 1,473 2,362 439 156 4,430 29 1,590 2,834 645 239 5,308 30 2,355 4,174 653 213 7,398 15,175 TOTAL 65,069 123,854 24,004 8,766 221,693 98 TOTAL 64,626 121,210 20,677 10,637 211,150 %OF SALE 29 56 11 4 100 SALES INC OR DEC 4,543 2 8 • 91l /I �PM anal al HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Statement of Revenues and Expenses Month and Penod Ended August 31, 1999 Finstimm CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE YEAR-TO -DAIE Over (Under) Budget Over (Under) Budget VARIANCE % Revenue , Actual Budget Dollars Percent Actual Budget Dollars Percent Aug -98 1999 vs 1998 1 In patient revenue $1,671.814 $7655696 $16,118 1.0% $13,885,052 $13,298644 $586,208 4.4% $12,178,028 140% 2 Out patient revenue 2087460 2,217,087 (129,627) -58% 16.761,285 17,115,151 (348,166) -2.0% 15,156,125 10.6% 3 Restdent Revenue 413,435 397.067 16 41% 3,411,533 3 234,161 7.4% 3,106,731 9.8% 4 Trial patienUresicenl revenue $4,172.709 $4,269,B50 ($97,141) -2.3% $34,063,870 $33,591,667 $472,203 1.4% $30,440,884 11.9% Discounts 5 Governmental 6 Policy Discount 1,519,540 1,605,229 (85,689) -53% 12,892,818 12,692,815 200.003 1.6% 10,314,835 25.0% 6 Free Care 0 6 (6,666) -100 0% 10,61)(1 53.333 (42,733) -80.1% 33,753 -686% 7 Total deduction from revenue $1,519.540 $1,611,895 ($92,355) -5.7% $12,903,418 $12,746,148 $157,270 -78.5% $10,348,588 247% 8 Net pahant/resident revenue $2,653,169 $2,657,955 ($4,786) -02% $21,160,452 $20,845.519 $314,933 1.5% $20,092,296 53% 9 Other operating revenues 21,153 24,903 (3,750) -15.1% 154,742 197.781 (43,039) -21.8% 199,680 -225% 10 Nei operating revenue $2,674,322 $2682,858 ($8,536) -03% $21,315,194 $21043,300 $271894 1.3% $20,291,976 50% Expenses 11 Salaries $1,271,327 $1,173,094 $98,233 84% $9.643,424 $9,306,097 $337,327 36% $8,927510 80% 12 Employee Benefits 261,403 262,108 (705) -03% 2,135,106 2087,109 47,997 2.3% 1,909,022 118% 13 Professional and Medical Fees 310,931 251,302 59,629 237% 2,275,766 2,005634 270,152 135% 2,521,931 -9.8% 14 Utilities. Mtnce Contracts 8 Repairs 137,040 141,948 (4,906) -35% 1,042,321 1,108,045 (65,724) -5.9% 957,391 8.9% 15 Food, Dogs 8 Supplies 369,617 354,311 15,306 4 3% 2,641,528 2,775,310 66,218 2.4% 2741.316 3 7% 16 Other expense 59,076 81,829 (22,753) -27.8% 570,200 661.226 (91,026) -13.8% 553,610 3.0% 17 Minnesota Care 21.065 21,068 0 00% 158455 168,547 (10,092) -60% 137,161 15.5% 1B Bad debt 24,650 40,128 (15478) -386% 300,490 327,251 (26,761) -8.2% 242,132 24.1% 19 Interest 40,565 40,562 3 0.0% 331,713 331,279 434 0.1% 362,323 - .84% 20 Depreciation 147,762 159,062 (11,300) -71% 1,105,063 1.188,998 (83,935) -7.1% 1,075,730 27% 21 Total expenses $2,643,439 $2525412 $118,027 47% $20,404,086 $19959498 $444,568 2.2% $19,428,126 50% Excess of net operating revenue 22 over (under) operating expenses $30,883 $157,446 ($126,563) -804% $911 $1 ($172,694) -15.9% $863,850 5.5% Nonoperining Revenues 23 Investment rnl a $18008 $37,500 ($18,594) -49.6% $88,585 $300.000 (5211415) -70.5% $301,391 -70.6% 24 Other nonoperatirg revenue (net) (32,878) 435 (33,313) -76582% 6,686 24,031 (17,345) -72.2% 13,621 .509% 25 Total nonoperating revenue ($13,972) $37,935 ($51,907) -1368% $95271 $324031 ($228,760) -706% $315,012 -69.8% 26 Net Inane $16,911 $195,38 ($ -913% $1,006,379 $1,407,833 ($401454) -28.5% $1, -146% 27 Patient days 829 814 15 1.8% 6,856 6.615 241 3.6% 6,125 119% 28 Resident days 3,572 3,554 18 0.5% 28,479 28,775 (296) -10% 28,669 -07% 29 Percent occupancy - budgfel Beds - Hospital 446% 43.9% 08% 1 B% 470% 45.4% 1.7% 36% 420% 11.9% 30 Percent occupancy - budget beds - Nursing Home 937% 932% 0.5% 05% 953% 96.3% -1.0% -1.0% 929% 2.6% 31 FTE's 396.21 39058 5 6 1.4% 39720 390.58 6.6 1.7% 3932 1.0% 32 Admissions (adjusted) - Hospital only 476 534 (59) -110% 3,826 4,114 (209) -7.0% 3,793 0.9% 33 Expenses (net) per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only 4,479 3,796 683 180% 4,270 3,871 399 10.3% 4,109 39% 34 Revenue per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only 7.812 7,106 706 9.9% 7,854 7,224 630 8.7% 7,034 11.6% 35 Net Revenue per admission (adjusted) - Hosptal only 4,684 4,152 532 12.8% 4,581 4,197 384 92% 4,378 46% 36 Discounts as a percent of revenues 364% 37 8% -1 3% -35% 37.9% 37.9% -0.1% -02% 34.0% 11 4% 37 FTE's per 100 admissions (adjusted) . Hospital only 50 4 4 0 6 13.1% 4.8 44 0.4 102% 4 8 05% 38 Days in Net Accounts Receivable 647 540 10.7 19.9% 647 01% 39 Case ?Ax - Home only 2.65 245 020 B 2% 2 57 2.45 0 12 4.9% 243 58% Finstimm 9/17/99 PM HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Comparative Balance Sheet As of August 31, 1999 ASSETS Current Assets I Cash and investments - Operations 2 Cash and investments - Self-Insured 3 Subtotal cash 8 Investments (A) (B) (A)-(e) AUG JULY AUG Change 1999 1999 1998 CY vs PY $4,218,219 $3.930.798 $2,346,515 1.871 704 543 $517 1 (511,291) $4.762.208 $4,448,496 $3,401.794 1,360414 4 PatienUResident receivables 9,953,298 9,395,154 6.389,179 3,564.119 5 Alloaences for bed debts (3,001,876) (2.390,328) (1,069,691) (1,932,185) 6 Advances end conlractual aWvrances (1 804 802) (1 657 078) (1,788,704) 181,902 7 Net patient/resident and tMrd -party P lant Assets 8 payor receivables $5,346,620 $5.147,748 $3.532,783 1,813,837 9 5165,696 (0) 17 Bulcl gs 10 Other receivables - net 98,630 87,750 12,979 85,651 11 Inventories 627,521 626,054 452,273 175,248 12 Prepaid expenses 201,140 97,110 40,169 160,971 13 Total Current Assets $11,036,119 $10,407,158 $7,439,997 3,596.122 Total Current Llebildies 14 (A) $6,908936 (B) (A) jB) 739,146 AUG JULY AUG Change $93 1999 1999 1998 CY vs PY LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES P lant Assets Current Liabilities 16 Land $165,696 Current maturities of 5165,696 (0) 17 Bulcl gs Long term debt $347,333 $452.055 $455.552 (108,219) Accamis payable - trade 1608,527 1,136,205 1,231031 377,496 Estimated contractual Buildings less depredation $13,893,995 $13,638,721 $11,403,839 settlements -nat 1,045,677 1.019,096 1,037,261 8,416 Accrued expenses- 2.942,229 21 Accumulated depreciation (8,779,709) Salaries 796,250 614,713 587,406 208.844 PTO 940,782 943,181 819,019 121,763 Interest 174.948 105,293 252,317 (77,369) Self - Insured programs 454.041 429,408 534,115 (80.074) MN Care tax payable 56,239 57.325 97,173 (40,934) Deferred liabilities 28,328 24,349 34.722 (6,394) Deferred revenue (9,862) (4,931) 7 (17,009) Total Current Llebildies 14 Board DewrInaled /Funded Depreciation Investments $6,908936 $6,996,706 $6,169,790 739,146 15 Investment in Joint Ventures $93 $93,160 $108 (15,824) P lant Assets 16 Land $165,696 $165,696 5165,696 (0) 17 Bulcl gs 22,077,002 21,741,980 18,144,532 3,932,470 18 Accumulated depreciation (8,183,007) (8,103,259) (6,740 693) (1,442,314) Lorca -term Deal (less aliment 19 Buildings less depredation $13,893,995 $13,638,721 $11,403,839 2,490,156 maturities) 20 Equipment 12,866684 12,855,940 9,924,455 2.942,229 21 Accumulated depreciation (8,779,709) (8,685,627) (6,908,524) (1,871,185) 22 Equipment less depredation $4 ,086,975 $4,170,313 $3,015,931 1,071,044 23 Cash�onslnx:bon & equipment 0 0 0 0 24 Construction in progress 420,066 419,774 587.321 (167.255) 25 Total Plant Assets $18,566,732 $18,394,504 $15,172.787 3,393,945 Fund balance 26 01119! A MIs Deferred fmancrig cods $115,349 $116664 $230,662 (115,313) 27 Total Funds $36,720,296 $36,008,192 $29,122,220 7,598,07 Total Funds $5,442,263 $4,776694 $5,055.743 386,520 $14.66 $14,656 $11,735,486 2,933,158 $16,609,389 $16,572,923 $12,330,991 4,278,398 $36,720,296 $36,008,192 $29,122,220 7,598.0 Finstmnl Pam Larson 9/24/1'79Q HiliUHTNSON U 0 - nr _.,. .uN E(N,,f E SHFF AUGUF 31, 19'v ASSETS UTILITY PLANT - AT COST LAND 8. LAND RIGHTS DEPRECIABLE UTILITY F'LANT TOT AL UTILITY_ PLANT LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION T OT AL ACCU MULATED DEPRECIAT CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS TOTAL CONSTR IN PRO TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS FUTURE EXPANSION 8 DEVELOPMENT IN - GAS RESERVES MEDICAL INSURANCE -- BOND A INTEREST PAYMENT 1993 BOND RESERVE - 1993 CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS -._ CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS CASH IN BANK IN 6 SAVIN ACCOUNTS __- ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE OTHER ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - 3M INVENTORIES PREPAID INSURANCE ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE C LEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL CURRENT 8 ACCRUED ASSETS DEFERRED CHARGE BOND DISCOUNT 1993 TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE TOTAL ASSETS HLh. 1 AL 991 , 734.75 -- - - - 56,617,96i.57 (22,984,723.03) (23,984,723.03) _ ' 978,914.94 -_ ___ 9 78,914.94 33,303,888.23 103,273.91 -- 105,273.91 47,288,300.69 L i f 500,000.00 54 4,8_5 3.73 100,000.00 - - -- - 1,043,481.24 1, 389, 320.00 1,250,000.00 4,827,654.97 -� 3,204,724.48 —._ - -- 76- -_ -- - - _ 1,931,430.28 721,485.69 _ 833 _ 44,974.71 - -- - - 24,309.10 14 335.75 _ 6,851,483.50 103,273.91 -- 105,273.91 47,288,300.69 L i f 1o'ILr NCE SHLET AUGUST ;i . MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIAAILZTIES MUNICIPAL EQUITY MUNICIPAL EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY LONG TERM LIABILITIES —NET OF CU RRENT MATURI_TIES 1993 BONDS TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES CONSTR CONTRACTS 8 ACCTS PAY RETAIN TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 6 ACCTS PAY ;1 CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE INTEREST ACCRUED _ ACCTS PAYABLE TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON ACCRUED PAYROLL AC CRUED VACATION PAYABLE ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND ACCRUED REC PAYMENT CUSTOMER DEPOS OTHER CURRENT 8 ACCRUED LIABILITIES TOTAL CURRENT 8 ACCRUED LIAB —� TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIAB 1 950,000.00 9,930,000.00 oja] 1 125,404.01 _ - 120,000.00 108,174.14 162,204.25 (44,746.53) 944.72 73 640.00 39,861.32 1,676,411.08 47,288,300.69 r r ✓'..t _ �J 34, R52, 188. 11 809,70i.50 _.__ - - -- -- 33 -- ,-- --- - -- - -- 9/ 4/1999 0 ! Ft-'T-II Lh3OA U);L.I II E_ 1.: - NMM ISLiON FACE STATEMENT OF INCOMF 6 i- :XF'ENSES AUGUST 31, L999 FY:E:YINJS _ CUF _ B UDGE (ED _H UDGE 7- _____ ,IJp�UIU.. —_ _ YEAR TO DATE YLAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE DEVIATION BUDGES INCOME STATEMENT OPERATING REVENUE ...__. 9ALES — ELECTRIC ENERGY 8,777,300.72 9,363,011.36 8,491,300.00 871,711 -36 J. 85a), 000.O0 SALES FOR RESALE 1.239,410.07 925,723.12 920,000.00 5,723_12 1.000,000.00 NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOUR .-- _ —_ 164.69 _ E 4 _1 60 SECURITY LIGHTS 8,226.00 7,830.50 8,710.09 (879.50) 13,000.00 - POLE RENTAL 2,678.00 2,595.75 4,800.00 (1,404.23) 4,000.00 �- SALES G - -- -- -_._.. - - - 3,658,063,44 — _ - ,54- 98 _ 3.6 9 544 -- 4 , 3�g,.3 4Q -- - _ S�Q � .02� E,20h,33N?.OQ _ - -- TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 13,746,142.}'2 13,9?0,5i0,3i 13,688,350.00 302,160.31 20,142,700.00 - OPERATING EXPENSES PRODUCTION OPERATION f, 079, 20G. 70 888,373.83 813,319.38 4,945.55 1,191,394.00 PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE 207,666.19 320,553.88 483,324.00 (35,231.80) 1,150,808.00 t- PURCHASED POWER 2.256,138.11 1,612,873.08 (643,263.11) TRANSMISSION OPERATION _ 1,303,073.72 609.18 .00 .00 .00 3,400.00 - TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE 15,78B.73 3`x,382.94 37,930.00 (1,452.94) 75,000.00 - ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPERATION 17 6,633.5 6 193,70.17 175,420.0 _(1 ._ 26900_00 -- ELECTRIC ISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE - 98.776.83 ___ 118,477.53 134,003.00 15,527.47 187,700.00 MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION 489.76 439.60 327.50 87.90 1,250.00 MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE 1 ,032.21 S,O37.48 2,715.00 _ 1,677.32 _ .4,500_.00 __ [ PUR34ASED GAS EXPENSE 6,549,877.93 6,306,695.97 6,425,360.00 S1B,664.03 9,380,800.06 - GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION 136,011.64 148,102.94 154,500.00 6,397.06 233,500.00 GAS DISTRIBUTION MAINTENAN _ 3 8.805.77 62 ,642.56 44,821.00 (17,821.36) 33,40s�UQ_„ CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING 8 COLLECTIONS 150,718.93 163,786.51 131,883.50 (13,903.01) 234,850.00 ADMINISTRATIVE 8 GENERAL EXPENSES 934,372.23 941,878.17 935,163.00 (6,713.17) 1,466,700.00 '- DEPRECIATION 988,360.00 1.166.666 1.131,90",90 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 11,881,409.42 _ 12,729.918.17 12,103,743.38 (624.174.79) 18,371,694.00 OPERATING INCOME 1,864,733.50 1,260,592.14 1,582,606.62 (322,014.48) 771 ¢°,6.00 _ - r OTHER INCOME k OTHER - NET 59,031.36 83.040 57,720.00 320.34 _ 92 6, -q— INTEREST INCOME 208.174.38 203,624.84 212,725.00 _=5 (9,100.16) 317,800.00 - MISC INCOME 174,834.27 8,096.83 41,916.50 (33,819.67) 275,580.00 - GAIN ON DISPOSAL. .00 .00 .00 .00 _ 1.600.u8 M SC INCOME - GAS WELLS _ _ 148,267.47 146,378.58 170,850.00 (24.471.42) 255,000.00 TOTAL OTHER INCOE 590,307.68 441,140.59 483,211.50 (42,070.91) 941,600.00 OTHER EXPENSES -- -- -- -- -- - - --- DEPLETION - GAS WELLS .00 .00 .00 .00 65,000.00 MISC EXPENSES' 77 411.74 78,137.83 59.930.00 (18,207.83) - - - e8, 000.00 INTEREST EXPENSE 368,909.89 333.893.40 334,343.75 _ 650.33 300,123.08 T - TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES 446,321.63 412,031.23 394,473.73 (17,557.48) 673,123.00 463,333.34 480,000.80 482,408.00 2,400.00 720,000.00 - CONTRIBUTION TO CITY TOTAL CONTRIBUTION TO CITY 463,333.34 480.000.00 482,400.00 2,400.00 720,000.00 - - - MON- 00ERATING INCON£ -- -- - -- - -- (319,347.29) (430,890.64) (393,662.23) (57,228.39) (451,525.00) r MET INCOME 1,345,386.21_ 809, '1,188,944 (379 ,242_87) _ _ 1,319,531.00___