Loading...
cp06-12-2000 cA Am JUNE SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 2000 -11- -12 -13- 7:00 am. — Leadership Team LEAGUE OF HUTCHINSON Meeting in City Center Main MINNESOTA CITIES CITY JAYCEE WATER Conference Room CONFERENCE CALENDAR CARNIVAL WEEK 1:30 p.m. — Management Team at City IN ST. CLOUD Center Main Conf erence Room June 13-16 3:30 p.m. —Open Bids for Two Fire WEEK OF Trucks in Council Chambers June 11 -17 4 s 4:00 p.m. — City Council Workshop in Main Conference Room 1 2 5:30 p.m. — City Council Meeting in ` Council Chambers WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY -14- -15- -16- -17- CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/ FLAG DAY TRAINING/VACATION 6/12 -16 Marilyn J. Swanson (V) 45 6/12 Ken Merrill (Nn �' C -Conference M = Meeting S = Seminar T =Training V = Vacation W = Workshop AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2000 2. INVOCATION — Pastor Jonathan Rathjen, Peace Lutheran Church 3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of May 23, 2000 and Bid Opening Minutes of June 9, 2000 Action - Motion to approve as presented i . O (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT FOR MAY 2000 2. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2000 3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2000 4. CIVIL SERVICE POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 12, 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00-269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31; MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 27, 2000) 2. ORDINANCE NO. 00-274 - REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM R -I TO C-4 LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 3. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 - REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S THIRD ADDITION FROM R -1 TO R -2 AND R -3 AS REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 4. ORDINANCE NO. 00-276 - REZONING FROM UC TO R -2 (106 MONROE STREET SE) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY'S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) (c) DANCE PERMITS: r JOSE PALACIOS ON AUGUST 12 & AUGUST 26, 2000 • > HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION ON JULY 1, 2000 (WAIVE FEE) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JUNE 12, 2000 • (d) SHORT -TERM "ON SALE" NON- INTOXICATING 3.2 BEER LICENSE ON JUNE 30 — JULY 2, 2000 FOR HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION AT FAIR GROUNDS (WAIVE FEE) (e) TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE ON JUNE 30 — JULY 2, 2000 FOR HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION AT FAIR GROUNDS (WAIVE FEE) (f) TOBACCO LICENSE FOR POTTERS PASTIMES (g) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR DIRECTOR RANDY DEVRIES TO ATTEND ANNUAL WATER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 14-18,2000 IN ANAHEIM, CA Action — Motion to approve consent agenda 5. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M. (a) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 00-01; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SANITARY SEWER - PHASE 1 Action — Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 11491 & No. 11492 (b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00-02; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER — PHASE 2 • Action — Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 11493 & No. 11494 (d) PETITION TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED IN OUTLOT A OF ISLAND HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION Action — Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 00-277 and set second reading for June 27, 2000 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) PRESENTATION BY JEFFREY J. BLOOM REGARDING INTERNET GAMING PARTY AT FAIR GROUNDS ON AUGUST 4 & 5, 2000 Action - 7. (a) CONSIDERATION OF DEFERRING RESCUE VEHICLE BID OPENING UNTIL SPRING 2001 Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve postponement MINNFU ICI (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FROM HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER • • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JUNE 12, 2000 OF COMMERCE FOR THE 26 ANNUAL ARTS & CRAFTS FESTIVAL TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 15 & 16. 2000 • USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE PARK FOR EXHIBITORS • CLOSING OF DESIGNATED STREETS AND MUNICIPAL PARKING LOTS • RESERVE ALL CONCESSION RIGHTS IN DOWNTOWN AREA AND CONTROL OF FOOD EXHIBITORS FOR TASTE OF HUTCHINSON Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 00 -20, SOUTH GRADE ROAD (DALE STREET TO SCHOOL ROAD) MSA PROJECT Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11495 awarding bid (c) CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING WAL- MART'S FINAL PLAT Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Revised Resolution No. 11453 (d) CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING BROCHURE WITH PROCEDURE AND PRACTICES • Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (e) CONSIDERATION OF OBTAINING A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF COMMUNITY CENTER PREDESIGN PROPOSAL Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (a) COMMUNICATIONS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds � � 1: ►lu 1 ►r L • MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000 1. Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jim Haugen, , Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. Absent: John Mlinar. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering John Rodeberg and City Attorney Marc A. Sebora. 2. Pastor Jon Lindekugel presented the invocation. i u 1►l The minutes of the regular meeting of April 25, 2000 and May 9, 2000 were approved as presented. (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 2000 2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 2000 • 3. FINANCIAL REORT AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR APRIL 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31; MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 12) 2. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -273 - PARTIAL VACATION OF BOSTON STREET AND BALTIMORE AVENUE (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11471 —RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (c) DANCE PERMIT FOR 2000 POLKA FESTIVAL AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIR GROUNDS ON JUNE 8-10,2000 (d) SHORT -TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ON AUGUST 22, 2000 (e) APPOINTMENT OF SUSAN MARTI TO CIVIL SERVICE POLICE COMMISSION (f) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 00-01; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SANITARY SEWER - PHASE 1: ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11476 — RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF 3, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 2000 REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11477 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00-02; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER - PHASE 2: ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11478 - RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11479 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: (g) LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY HOERNEMANN TRUST (SECTION 7 OF HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11482) (h) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11483) (i) REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM R -1 TO C4 LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -274 AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 12, 2000) (j) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 4 -LOT SUBDMSION LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS. REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11484) (k) REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S THIRD ADDITION FROM R -1 TO R -2 AND R -3 AS REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE.FI ST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 12, 2000) (1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT UTILITY TRANSMISSION LINE IN FLOODWAY (SECTION 8 OF HASSAN VALLEY) AS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDTAION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11485) (m) REZONING FROM PC TO R -2 (106 MONROE STREET SE) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY'S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -276 AND SET SECOND READING FOR NNE 12, 2000) 1'' (n) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE HIGHER THAN 30' • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000 IN FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 795 COLORADO STREET AS REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11486) (o) 6" VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE SPACE ADDITION AT 340 MICHIGAN STREET SE WHICH DOES NOT MEET REQUIRED SETBACK OF 30 FEET AS REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11487) (p) VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 945 FIFTH AVENUE SE AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD MCCLURE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11488) (q) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING WITHIN FLOODWAY OF SOUTH FORK OF CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY CITY OF HUTCHINSON WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11489) (r) LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW AS REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION • WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11490) Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve the consent agenda except for item 4-(b)-I, Ordinance No. 00 -269, which was pulled from the agenda and items (h), (i) and 0) pertaining to Menard Inc. which were pulled for discussion. Motion unanim ously carried. Items 4-(h), (i) & 6) — Rodeberg stated there were no particular issues with these items, but he wanted to address the property in the Hoernemann Estate. The City Engineer then showed the City Council a drawing of the proposed store to be built in Hutchinson. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended a pre -cast facility, which was an issue of aesthetics. Jim Sheppard, a representative of Menard Inc., requested that the City Council look favorably on the plan and approve the building as proposed in the drawing since it is a standard design for Menards. Haugen informed the Council that the Planning Commission voted unanim ously for pre -cast panels as presented. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve: (h) — conditional use permit and adopt Resolution No. 11483; (i) — rezoning of property and waive first reading of . Ordinance No. 00 -274 and set second reading for June 12, 200; and 0) — preliminary plat and adopt Resolution No. 11484. Motion unanim ously carried. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000 5. PUBLIC RIN — 6:00 P.M. (a) ASSESSMENT HEARING ON ROLL NO. 5039, LETTING NO. 6; PROJECTS NO. 99 -20, 00 -09, 00 -12 THROUGH 00 -14, 00-16 THROUGH 00 -19 The Mayor called the hearing to order at 6:00 p.m. Rodeberg explained the purpose of the assessment hearing and the payment options available. He stated that the assessment was based on actual project costs, and the interest rate would be both the costs plus an additional one percent, which would amount to approximately 6.5% or 7.5 %. Project No. 00-09 — Griffin Avenue NE The City Engineer reported that the actual street costs came in at $73.18 a front foot which was significantly over the estimates. He stated the cost variance from the estimate was due to the level of storm sewer reconstruction, cost of tile lines and especially the higher cost of bituminous. Therefore, the proposed rate was 10% over the estimated range given at the public hearing. The City would be paying two-thirds of the project cost. The property owner at 205 Griffin Avenue NE stated he favored the project. However, he had a concern about the cost to the homeowner and felt it was a high price for a city street. Although he didn't have an answer to the situation, he wanted to express his opinion as a homeowner and taxpayer. • Roger DeMeyer, 307 Griffin Avenue NE, also expressed concern about the cost to the property owner. He inquired about the assessment policy for a comer lot. Rodeberg was concerned that the City would be setting a precedent on this project with the substantial increase in cost. The Mayor suggested that the project not be awarded and be rebid in 2001. Project No. 00-12 — Hilltop Drive NE The City Engineer stated that this project would cover bituminous wear course and sewer and water service. Like the previous project, the costs were higher than expected because of the higher petroleum/bituminous prices. He noted that the assessments would be on a per lot basis as stated in the Subdivision Agreement. No one was present to be heard Project No. 00-13 — Hunter's Ridge (Wear Course Paving) Rodeberg commented that this project came in at a reasonable cost. The estimated cost per lot was $1,100 to $1,300, and the final assessment rate will be based on the bid price received. No one was present to be heard. Project No. 00-17 — Michael Court (Boyle's Addition) • CITY COUNCII. MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000 The City Engineer reviewed the layout of the project. He noted that Chet Hoversten owns five or six lots. Although the City saved money by runnin a street through the area, it will have no value until the area is developed. Only the sanitary sewer, watermain, street and storm sewer is included in the assessment. He suggested that perhaps only the sanitary sewer should he completed in 2000 due to the need beyond the immediate plat. Attorney Jody Winters represented Chet Hoversten, a.k.a. Chet and Associates. She stated that her client was in favor of the entire project and not just street and sanitary sewer. Winters also claimed the assessments were not equal to the value of the five - lot parcel at an assessment of $30,000 per parcel if the City cannot prove the value and benefits. She also admonished the City for mailing Mr. Hoversten's notice to a post office box in Glencoe when he resides in Wisconsin. In closing, Winters inquired about the City's intent north of the cul -de -sac. Rodeberg responded that there would he development to the north with a sewer into the KDUZ property. Otherwise, there would be no other proposed development in that area. The City Attorney stated that it was the City's obligation to send a notice to the address maintained by the County. He further remarked that the assessments were valid. The objection of the party is to file a notice within 30 days. The City Engineer closed his presentation by stating only sanitary sewer would be • done in 2000. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to close the hearing at 6:27 p.m. Motion unanim ously carried. Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to rebid project No. 00 -09. Motion unanim ously carried. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve project No. 00-12. Motion unanim ously carried. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve project No. 00 -13. Motion unanim ously earned. Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to proceed with accepting sanitary sewer only for project No. 00-17. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 11480 and No. 11481. Motion unanim ously tamed. MEE MMT V MUM 5 X111i *5 vVICI 13 W WN 00► • (a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING NEW BID OPENING DATE OF JULY 17, 2000 AT 5:30 P.M. FOR CTTY/RLRAL SHARED RESCUE VEHICLE • Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to approve the new bid opening date. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000 Motion unanimously carried. 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the sale of city surplus property. Motion unanimously carved. (b) CONSIDERATION OF CITY'S VISION STATEMENT AND CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENTS Plotz reported that the City Council reviewed the proposed City's vision statement and City Council vision statement during a recent workshop. Some minor changes were made at that time. In the future, the vision statements will be reviewed on an annual basis. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve and adopt the two vision statements. Motion unanim ously carried. u I : ►1 (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR The Mayor read a letter received from Jeffrey Higginbotham, Assistant Director of the U.S. Department of Justice that was addressed to the Chief of Police. In his letter, Director Higginbotham expressed thanks for the use of the public safety training facility for the North Central Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER KAY PETERSON Peterson stated there was one opening on the local Library Board and two positions on the Pioneerland Library System Board. Interested parties should contact the public library or City staff. (c) COMMUNICATIONS TO SET WORKSHOP DATES > It was clarified that the workshop on June 12, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. was for the purpose of reviewing the community survey final report with the Community Needs Task Force. > It was noted that the HRA had requested a joint meeting of the City Council with the HRA Board on June 20, 2000 at noon. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to hold a workshop with the HRA Board on June 20, 2000 at 12:00 noon. Motion unanimously carried. P • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000 ➢ It was recommended to hold a budget workshop on August 22, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. and continue it after the regular City Council meeting. Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to approve the budget workshop on August 22, 2000. Motion unanim ously carried. 10. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve the verified claims A and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the verified claims B and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion carved with Hoversten abstaining from voting. � � l: ►lul ►Y • There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m. • 7 • MINUTES BID OPENING FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2000 Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 10:00 am. Also present were Quentin Larson, SRF Consultant Dave Roedel, and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. Merrill dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 6174, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 7, Project No. 00 -20. The following bids were opened and read: D & C Dozing Montevideo, MN $825,806.82 Duininck Bros., Inc. Prinsburg, MN 745,040.32 Juul Contracting Company • Hutchinson, MN 874,931.20 Quam Construction Company Inc. Willmar, MN 777,921.25 Wm. Mueller & Sons Inc. Hamburg, MN 787,932.69 The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation. It was reported that Letting No. 7 would be awarded at the June 12, 2000 City Council meeting. The meeting adjourned at 10:10 am. • M CITY OF HUTCHINSON BUILDING / PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT I I I HASSAN STREET S.E HUTCHINSON NN5535t 40NE:612- 234 -42-16 FAX:612.234 -0240 May 2000 NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBUCLY OWNED HOUSEKEEPING Itarn `Axber of valuabm of Numeer of 1 1aluabon of BUILDINGS No. carsWCtbn Buildings HOU.SM . Strucbw Bwtdirgs Housing Units Onut cane Unite mlf cenrs I (a) of (c) (d) (e) (1) 9) Single -amdy twuses, detached Erdipa n,00wa nar,a 101 12 12 1,144,000 Slrgle -fanny houses. altsched = MaYTa�b b /OOl aa1. - wuwsowao(we. a,e SaQMYIrM aY✓°emadutaw n,ab,a 102 Tvro-amay buildnas 103 Three- and ford -farniiy buildinge 104 Frveor -more farts' buildings 105 TOTAL: Sun a 101 -105 100 12 12 , 144, 000 NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED NONHOUSEKEEPING Ism Nsabad I valuation of Number of valuation or BUILDINGS No. caneuction corstrudtlon &sltirgs Roprns 8uibkge Rooms and Cana Omd cents (d) (b) fa (d) (e) (f) (g) Hot". motew ano tourat cabins (trarwent a0wr modauons crew) 213 Other ranho sekeepirg shelter 214 NEW PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED NONRESIDENTIAL lam Number Vakaoon of Numuer of Valuation Of BUILDINGS No. of mmaactnn B Mwv wrsmctpn BnAdga true canes orriecana (A) (b) (c) (d) (al Amusement, sodel- and recreational 316 Churches and other reagioua 316 Indstnal 320 2 3,736,000 Parking gsmgm (6W0rgs s open decked) 321 Service stations amt repel garages 322 Hospitals and kuae411tiorlN 323 OOkse, balls. and professional 324 Public aorls end utilities in 2 1,459.000 Schools and other educational 326 Stores and cuslnner services 327 Omer nonresidential budOns 326 Structures other man buildings 326 1 7,500 ADDITIONS, PRIVATELY OWNED PUBUCLY OWNED ALTERATIONS, Item Number VaMtipn of Number of Vakatian of AND CONVERSIONS No, of construction Buildings oarsvuctbn Buddir s OraPCena Omd cenrs (a) (b) (c) (d) fe) Residential - pegdt'addOwsof 434 gangw and cuowa n flow 438 4 13.000 NOW9114antlal and ncnhoueekeeping 437 1 1 112,500 1 3,000 Additions, of res lerobal garages and 436 tarpons (attached and detached) DEMOLITIONS PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED AND RAZING Item Number Number of Number of Number of OF BUILDINGS No. of Housing unite Budd" Housing units Build gs (a) (b) (c) (d) ,el SWOwlamly trouser (attessd orb 645 detaasd) 1 1 Two-family bui di ge a" Three and faa -amity burklkge 647 Fve-or -more family bu*kgs me Aa 10r buildings and atnlcrurae 649 non -ry, ono -o, awn -o, nn� -e, renux. -lv. unav ewnx -w. nnx�. n - - - - SHED -1, SPRINKLER -3 Total Petmits 103 Total Valuation $6,519.877 Total :nsp. 259 44) -2 WfDFVIOUAL PElIIWTS AUTM FM3M LVNSTMIA:inAa YALYCU A Plaaaa Ra.+da dr �9 rMOmurlon for sam oarrrm auror0q � vaard a1 f3D0.000 a more _ araared ti a tt.a aeoya aeNma Ibm No Irani WIN* Saco" (a) Oaaubrbr. Na and addraaa of awnar or addax (c) O.wrrsh4 Mark (X) arr (d) yakwoon a corrsuctan Oral Cars (a) Nuroar of Houaaxl unb (0 uildrgs (9) 320 p ry y y�dy,(b) Induacr131 3M Com any m Prt r ❑ Punk 3 3,500,000 905 AdalKs Sc SE 90 Hutchinson `.01 325 Kind Of bL" City of Hutchinson ❑ PrNm m Pneae i 1,432,000 She addiwis 1300 Adams St SE 111 Hassan St SE Hutchinson, MN Ka.d of Wedng ❑ Pm.0 ❑ Pubac t Skmaddimis Ka.d of buddy ❑ PrNala ❑ P.DkC 1 f Cmsnwaa M you agars d any nm panlal -wq ❑ No O Yw • Rwe gw addNnrl ldwmmdm kr Cor r Naar d param to aa.fad "EC6 q dw raporl TaMpfror.a rlraa rnW NunnMr Enrulon Tr" II I I II NO POSTAGE N F E MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL r+vraur a�a rwrr.o. ®.o .aara�ww�oar�m P AQE y 9a PAD BY ADMESS F. W. Dodge Huildlnn .11nuvna I'U Hos Flri LmnRlm .MA 02420 -9536 Ill ..... ... 1.1...11..11 „11,,,1,1.,11...1 MINUTES Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board • May 4, 2000 Members present: Jay Beytien, Mark Cormier, Bernie Miner, John Mlinar, Dolf Moon, Sonja Muellerleile, Rich Pettet, Brett Rasmussen, Mike Schiesl, Theresa Sweeney. Minutes dated April 6, 2000 were approved by Bernie Miner and seconded by Theresa Sweeney. OLD BUSINESS Teen Survey: No report. School Aged Childcare: School Board passed 4 -8 grade program. Limited registration so far. Need to have 14 enrolled year round for program to go. Will be ok for the summer. Splitting kids up seems to be the biggest problem (i.e. 2°" & 4' grade). Arena Wrap -up: Applying for MRPA Facility Award. Is a feel good opportunity for Skating & Hockey Associations. Will meet with HYHA before June to discus finishing projects (landscaping, painting, water seal, extend roofline). NEW BUSINESS Summer Registration: 525,000 in registrations, 55,000 down from last year. Lines were gone in Ya hour. Longest line was Summer Discovery. Offering swimming lessons year round seems to help. People seem to be registering closer to the event. Classes stay small in fall/winter /spring due to lack of staff, bigger in summer. May not need 4 session of swimming in summer in future. Not concerned with budget at this point with dollars being lower. Recreation baseball is concem. Down 3 50 from last year. HJLB has a good evening program and have expanded age groups but affordability may be a problem. Softball Fees: Hutchinson Leader article about sanctioned softball leagues. Comes out to about S9 /team/game or 75¢/person/game. Sponsors sometimes pay for '' /z-all of fee. Sanctioned numbers are down. A lot of teams are coaching their kids instead of playing ball. Co- Recreation numbers are up. Fee breakdown includes: $198 (city gets for field maintenance) $198 (umpire fees) $ 52 (1 dozen softballs) S 3 5 (goes to org. for state fees) S 15 (optional trophies) Total 5498 Summer Projects: Oddfellows bathroom done July 4; BMX track; Arena; Connecticut Park playground. Will offer Menards the opportunity to donate playground equipment ($16,000- 20,000). They will still pay parkland fees ($ 16,000) regardless. Meeting next week.; Basketball court at Jr Community Women's Park; Dugout at Northwoods and Riverside Parks. HJLB is paying.; Landscape at schools with forestry grant; Veteran's Park — moving along. Want county wide initiative, Glencoe not on board but all others in county approve. Lots of representation at meetings. Want war memorabilia in park (i.e. tank).; Miscellaneous: • Target donated $20,000 for trail plus a $12,000 check. They will maintain trail. Summer Meeting Schedule: Normal meeting time for June. No July meeting, tour instead. Will notify board members. August meeting may be one (1) week later. Will notify board members. Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting • Monday My 22, 2000 Members Present: Connie Lambert,Mary Henke, Larry Ladd, Newton Potter Kay Peterson, Kay Johnson, Lois Carlson Members Absent: Richard Peterson Before the board meeting was called to order, president Connie Lambert awarded the Pioneerland Library System Hall of Fame Award to Delores Brunner and Barbara Whittenberg who were unable to attend the award dinner in Graceville. President Connie Lambert called the meeting to order. The minutes were approved as mailed. old Business: A lengthy discussion was held about the openings on the local and PLS boards. The board feels it is difficult to get people to join the PLS board because of such frequent meetings and the long distance required to travel to the meetings. It was suggested that the full Pioneerland Board could meet bimonthly or quarterly to help encourage participation. Kay Peterson will mention the situation to the council meeting and Kay Johnson will include an article in the Hutchinson Leader with the possibility that interested persons may respond. We purchased two planters from Jerry Brown and he will change the • plantings three times during the summer. Trees will be planted next month. Mary Henke reported on the budget. A 4% increase was submitted. Carpeting in the library needs replacing. Kay Peterson suggested we make the request soon as budget planning will be discussed at the next meeting. Mary Henke and Kay Johnson attended the County Commissioners meeting in Winsted. Pay equity problems were discussed and the 4% budget increase will likely be accepted. A thank you card was signed by the board for Paul Wright for his past work on the library board. A discussion was held about the Minneapolis library problems with pornography on the internet. Mary said we have a policy here that must be adhered to, and we have had no problem so far. Kay Johnson gave a report on the May 18 PLS board meeting. Items discussed were the 2001 budget; job description; pay equity issues; by -laws; and problems with fines. The next meeting will be Monday June 26,2000 at 4:30 PM • There were no donations in April. The meeting was adjourned. Lois Carlson, Secretary J/ 4) - '� 0 HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES 0 The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on May 12, 2000, at the Hutchinson Police Department. Present at the meeting were Cheryl Dooley, Bob Bowen, Lt. Dave Erlandson and Chief Steve Madson. The meeting was called to order. Chief Madson stated that the commission needed to certify the eligibility roster for the communication specialist position. He stated that oral interviews were conducted with all applicants for the position. A written examination was also administered to the applicants that suocessfully completed the first phase. Madson stated that Krystal Pass had been appointed an emergency full -time position and Robin Shoen an emergency part-time position. Both individuals are contained on the roster. A motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to accept the eligibility roster as presented to the commission. Motion carried. Chief Madson then stated to the commission that the number of applicants was low for this position. He stated that he felt this was due to the saturated job market, the schedule of 7 / 24 and the pay rate. With there being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Bob Bowen, seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to adjourn. Motion carved. Time of adjournment was 7:45 a.m. Bo Bowen PUBLICATION NO. 0 ORDINANCE N0. 00 -274 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -1 to C-i (proposed as Menard's Inc.) with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116. Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West, parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East, parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet, to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota LESS AND EXCEPT Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO- WIT: That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at Resolution NO. _ Menards Rezoning May 23, 2000 Page 2 the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A. thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 0 PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -I to R2 and R3 as provided in Exhibit A and with the following legal descriptions LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R2 Area: LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R3 Area: See Exhibit B See Exhibit C Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor ORDINANCE NO 00-275 Estebrook Area May 23, 2000 Page 2 EXHIBIT A oul DEVELOPERS RESOIRCE ORDINANCE NO 00-775 Estebrook area 0 May 23, 2000 Page 2 1 *3,'11:1 11� PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: That pat of Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod Coaoty, Mimmta, that ties east of the soruherly a¢endon of the east tine of Sherwood Street, acoordmg to the record pier of SCHIVIIDT BAUER'S FOURTH ADDITION; and north of tbn westerly erne mn of the north tine of the AUDITOR'S PLAT OF LOT 15 OF THE AUDITOR'S PLAT OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 116 NORM RANGE 29 WEST, according to the record plot thereof 0 • ORDINANCE NO oo-27 Estebrook Area Mav 23, 2000 Page 3 EXHIBIT B R -2 ZONING - That part of Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBEP A. files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County, Minnesota, that lies east of the southerly extension of the east line of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28 and southerly and westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the northeast comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28; thence on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the east line, and its southerly extension. of said Tract A, a distance of 264.37 feet; thence North 61 degrees 38 minutes 21 seconds East, a distance of 6.14 feet; thence 121.37 feet northeasterly along a tangential curve concave northwesterly having a radius of 1290.55 feet and a central angle of 05 degrees 23 minutes 18 seconds; thence 239.30 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of 405.00 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 51 minutes 17 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 337.50 feet; thence 240.80 feet southwesterly on a tangential curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 150.00 feet and a central angle of 91 degrees 58 minutes 38 seconds; thence South 02 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 560.27 feet to the south line of said Tract A. ,�pt17 t 0 R -3 ZONING: That part of Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County, Minnesota, that lies west of the southerly extension of the east line of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28. EXCEPT that part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assum bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest corner of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A; thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and its southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. 0 PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -276 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING IM" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from UC to R2 (Today's Property Management): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • Lot 1, Block 16, in the south half of Hutchinson Townsite, McLeod County, Minnesota Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor /ol z-, J / � APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 DBEs S0Wftd "*;b6 � r 9*b ptW ip der :. 1. 0 f�lnv ; U HaettblFfl Sr »Mesh No Y'R NO No Signature of Applicant 0 aID MAY 2 3 mo 09/99 1:1FORMSIDANCEPERMIT ftol 2 - Z APPUCATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 Dade Subrv~ Wiat b64W604 PrW b� •1 1 • � 1.1 r s AWa4e D" Actimof /�'1Y{IE/�Ii1� AID 1AFORMWANCEPERMJT MAY 2 3 2000 09199 QWGJkW 4 n , 3 77 - Y. omp*m.om NOW *. �. r C. u T �`. AM � ,_ •1 1 • � 1.1 r s AWa4e D" Actimof /�'1Y{IE/�Ii1� AID 1AFORMWANCEPERMJT MAY 2 3 2000 09199 QWGJkW 4 n , APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 DwW 8ubmftd Must bot 4_ Wooft pdW to done*dd*) 1 6 _ 1 - 0v 0 Narrr owppl[20 : jhForn A - 5 (R z Z) to K lC H- Addtsas - CrT rZr N � a nd SS - 7 -�L 33 - �U l6ER :Loco �. C� QEUn)lo/J $ _ .0.30 e /KSc� "' S '7 -1133 ,� LA t- 00-0 :�, � .: AladA Dawoy hT tlaathebcdOnz�� :w o No Rave �txtrt•itit1!a Yes Et68wt�ere ?' Yes o Signature of Applicant 0 1AFORMWANCEPERMff 4 -2, Fore No. � .w1. . raa REMEL "ON SALE" 0 0 Matt at AInne COUA'TI' Or. _. McLeod tier rr Hucchinsoa To the ........... .... city __Cauneil ................. ..of the ......... tics . ..... ............... d_Hk55h RR99........_ ....... ............ ....................... I .................................................. _._ ... State d �: HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REMON hereby apps ;es -Js s ilawm far W Mew of— .. _th days fre,ws M o f un 200010 ss7y At RdsH Only, Non4atokattas Mak LWIS ar as she same are, dsAnd by low, far awwwopilew "ON" thew eniaiw promises b Me dewribsd d fouew. Event to be held at McLeod County Fair Grounds at which piw+s aid aYf... as d is Mat wed r4raema amd •afa= feuaew: Shat said appuesw — r. ,1u,a. ._ef As Una" of post s+erat ehasasler wed repute; and he._ --zft the ape of 21 roan; that_------ poprtdar_o/ the s+tabliehinow for which the Ue n will be iemd if this amw -&iian w praabd. That w manrfaotw of suet ww�ntosirtlnp Matt Uquon has ear assnaehta to ndele or in Pori. in said bwdwew of said appitmat_ or awe iwtwwt Uwe,*; That rid apptioaat— .nsaka. -Mle apOtosttms pu+mant sad swbl" k a8 the low of the Btate of X wwwwo - and she wdi awes, and re,pwiatiw of sold r. +t.JL applicable Movie, which are hereby wads a part hwwf. and hwe,by apres_ -Se obmrw and oky W some; mr. v mane a o. Recommend approval. Driver's license I.D. required for purchase,. Steve nadson. Police Chief Fach applicant farther states that —hew not now the holder of, nor has _he mats application for, nor does —he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Deakr's special tax stamp for the safe of intoxicalma ligAw. , The American Legion has been contracted to serve 3.2 beer and intoxicating liquor at this event. 0 n.a.c_� / �'Cl P. rr 0. ,,// C.'.go y� SI 11 9 J . Minnt M Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Worcerneat Division 1 444 Cedar St -Suits 133 St Pahl, MN 55101 -5133 (651496.6439 TDD (651)282 -6555 APPUCATION AND PRRMPf FOR A TEWORARY ON -SALT LIQUOR 1.1(YNSE TYPE (M IMINT INIk"a N OF f1RC NiZATION c[ �' i s v� v; Al OAM, i TAX F�CF7111'T NUMBFJt $ TT Ai�NHtFSS S Y STATF / t' K 7JP cx)DB i ��I / ��c L etc: NAME N MA1aN0 Bl13IIVl33 PFIOdB: 110ME P110NB 2 3' c ? y ( ) DATER WILL L HK SOLD OF ORGAN17.ATK)N UCNARl7ABLU ORLDUGMS EER NONMO p CLUB OR TIO O L FFN RR !s r ` - _ (? ,.;�i` — , .c •_ /W1N e O I7�T1pN NAME / C S ti 5 f iM1YC a. O'T ON S NAMF. t c 'r(2 .� acs' J. C ,2,( L. I• M N S3 c Location wham license Will be used. If an outdoor area. dnaibe L2. `cr 1-7 I A.j ct H- k Will tlti; appKeanl eaouaet fGR ialwieaRie� BpKr iyrvicw' If a4 $iw the name sad M"M of uho ligror neaaree prow as tha trvioa L t u?lip ••. Lt= - r .f 3 License Code MCLONSS ID #966 - Will Iho aMlicaut carry liquor liability innrm =? If ^ die eanior't moos aatoem of covarap (N(TM. Inuffance is not mandatory.) C r3 G! 000 APPROVAL AMJCATWK =Rt ARtOYm W CM43K CORRNDIMO gUOW10670AIAMOIW AUAaU1JNOWOIK�M Cl'!"YICOUNry City of Hutchinson DATRAPPROVED CITY M AMOUNT $50-00 1.1(7NM DATFS DATE PAID SKfel TA UM' aMtIt tl lC Afl'RO�Y ®AlCeblAnrraarR rtldaarss OYsrr tMtt: M rat r'wrr e... e.. �arw. raa Mti pry N ea aaanw aaaw ar a4 rryrt lord b ei ei.rtte .ia k rewar/ r M ae.r.laartt t. s. dt! w qtr r V ]s suss Mprr W wry. . rt4ala» (Nli4 ,j/ , E-7. —fit—ate of Ainne"a. jr y M cLeod County of ....... .............................. . .................... dppU*atiom No ..... ... . .. .... A C C 0 Application for License to Sell Zi� at Retail The undersigned resident. of the. .__......._...... city_.._._.... in the county of............ . ........ . ..... Stage o f Minnesota, HBRZBr ir.4xz ...... dppzjci- TIOXFOR LICENSE to be ism"d . ......... to sell cigarettes a" oijarette papers and wrappers at reftil dt.­z ...... - — ------- ----- ----- --------------- . ...... .... - ------- — - --------- ------ .... ....... in tu ... ......... ULY ..... nann _._1a said couixty and state for the term of ..... .. 6--m-n-ths . . . ........... . ............. . ... beffinmixf w " A&_._L7 ........ - ..daV of ....... ........ . __' subj t a l aws o f the Stat of Mimnsmotm and the ordinanm and rejukWom of so" .. ....... . ...... ..... thereto, and herewith deposit s .7-6 ......................... . . . ....... iA P a y .191141m of the fee therefor. Da".. DAM .j u ri 720 L k .q ..... R.ve ........ . 0 4';y) I To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From: Randy DeVries, Utilities Director Date: 06/07/00 Re: Water Environmental Federation Annual Conference on Water Quality & Wastewater Treatment Per City Council Policy I am requesting attendance at the Water Environment Federation Annual Conference October 1418,2000 in Anaheim California. There will be 79 technical sessions, and over 800 exhibits at the conference. It has been two years since I attended this conference. It was budgeted for 2000, and I recommend approval. City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Parks & Recreation 900 Harrington Street SW Hutchinson, MN 55350-3097 (320) 587 -2975 Far (320) 234 -4240 Police Services 10 Franklin Street SW Hutchinson, MN 55350.2464 (320) 587.2242 Far (320) 5874427 — G. Hutchinson, .YIN 55350 -2522 (320) 587 -5151 Far (320) 234 -0240 Printed on recycled payer - PUBLICATION NO. 6177 i NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 11PROJECT NO. 00 -01 LETTING NO. 21PROJECT NO. 00-02 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at 6:00 PM on the 12th day of June, 2000, to consider the making of an improvement of: Project No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson Project No. 00-02 St SE South Area Trunk West of TH 15 Sanitary Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson St SE to pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefited property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $ 3.693.000.00 , with an Assessable Cost of $ 360.000.00 , for the total estimated cost of $ 4.053.000.00 . Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: May 23rd, 2000 PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 1ST, 2000 AND THURSDAY, JUNE 8TH, 2000. 111 Hassan St SE, Hutchinson MN 55350- 2522/Phons (32U) Zj"2UWl - ax ENGINEERING REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works DATE: May 23, 2000 SUBJECT: Letting No. I/Project No. 00 -01 & Letting No. ?!Project No. 00 -02 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they be constructed. Letting No. 1 /Proj. No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 1 - WWTF to Jefferson St SE Letting No. 2/Proj. No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 2 - Jefferson St SE to West of TH 15 ESTIMATED COST LettingNo.1 Proj. 00-01 Lofting No 2 Pry W-02 Tom Construction Cost $1,975,000.00 $1,225,000.00 $3,200,000.00 Engineering $276,500.00 $171,500.00 $448,000.00 Administration $98,750.00 $61,250.00 $160,000.00 FiscaULegal/lnterest $59,250.00j $36,750.001 $96,000.00 Other ( Properly Acquisition} $18,000.00 $131,000.001 $149,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL $2,427,500.00 $1,625,500.00 $4,053,000.00 ESTIMATED FUNDING Letting No.1 /Proj. 00-01 Letting No. 21Proj.00-02 Assessable Cost $60,000.00 Deferred Assessable Cost $300,000.00 City Bonded $1,800,000.00 City - Water /Sewer Funds $1,893,000.00 City — TIF $0.00 MSA $0.00 Mn/DOT $0.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL $4,053,000.00 cc: Cal Rlce - Engmeenng Department file: 0/00.01 & 17!00-02 RESOLUTION NO. 11491 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS LETTING NO. 1 PROJECT NO. 00 -01 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of May, 2000, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of: Project No. 00 -01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 1 - WWTF to Jefferson St SE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 23rd day of IMay, 2000. 2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000. 9 Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11492 9 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING NOS. 1 PROJECT NO. 00-01 WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of: Project No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson St SE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 am on Friday, July 7th, 2000, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, July 11th, 2000 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000. Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11493 • RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS LETTING NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 00 -02 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of May, 2000, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of: Project No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson Street SE to West of TH 15 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 23rd day of IMay, 2000. 2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000. 11 Mayor City Administrator 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11494 0 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING NOS. 2 PROJECT NO. 00-02 WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of. Project No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson Street SE to West of TH 15 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 am on Friday, July 7th, 2000, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council 1 0 Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, July 11th, 2000 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000. Mayor City Administrator PUBLICATION NO. 6176 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER: Thursday, June I, 2000 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING To Whom it May Concern: Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on Monday. June 12, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers at City Hall for the purpose of considering a petition to vacate drainage and utility easements located in Oadot A of Island View Heights 2nd Addition. This hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson. At such hearing, all interested persons may be heard. Ci Admini for May 30, 2000 Date 0 u S--9. CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson City Council Prepared By: Julie Wischnack, MCP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Date: June 7, 2000 — Meeting Date June 12, 2000 Applicant: Scenic Heights Investment Property Location: Outlot A — Island View Heights Second Addition Brief Description Staff is requesting the City Council approve the vacation of drainage and utility easements for Island View Heights Second Addition within Outlot A. The vacation is required as a part of the filing for the plat of Island View Heights Fifth Addition. Staff has properly published notice of a public hearing for the City Council meeting of June 12, 2000. Cc: William Gilk, Scenic Heights Investment s--c E ORDINANCE NO. 00 -277 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN OUTLOT A, ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1 . Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to vacate the drainage and utility easements locates in Outlot A, Island`V iew Heights Second Addition. The petitioners requesting vacation of the drainage and utility easements as a part of the platting process for Island View Heights Fifth Addition. Section 2 . That drainage and utility easements to be vacated are described as follows: All the drainage and utility easements as dedicated in Outlot A, Island View Heights Second Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota 0 0 Section 3 . This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council this 27thday of June. 2000. ATTEST: Cary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor From: Jeffrey J. Bloom (320)286 -5676 Cyberie(alrocketmail.com To: City Counsel DP2000 Executive Summary This proposal would bring several hundred computer users together at the Mcleod County fair grounds in a festive atmosphere. The media coverage and uniqueness of this interactive event would provide excellent exposure for the City of Hutchinson The nature of this gathering is to provide an interactive live networking event. This event will last for a non -stop 24 -hour period. This timing would serve all shifts currently available to every individual interested in participating. The location of this event will be one or more large building at the Fair grounds. This building will provide finnittue and access to power. Computer links will be provided by the local facilities. The proposed date of the event will be August 4 with setup on the 3. An informational meeting will be held on June 23a 12:00pm at the Victorian Inn (Coach). Your representative presence at this developmental meeting is very important. As we value your input. We recommend a combined sponsorship of several community agencies to assist with all incumbent issues. The proposed cost is set at $5000.00, your sponsorship would underwrite some or all of this cost. We propose that an entry fee be charged to help defray and return a large portion of this cost to the sponsors. The unique attraction and educational value of this event, will benefit local commerce and compliment the community as well This event will draw individuals from all age groups and geographical areas, to provide exposer to current computer technology. Our experience in this type of event leads us to predict the type of audience that this will bring in. These people are in general a diverse population of male and female, and a typical age span of 16-106 for the majority of participants. We recommend a minimum age of 16 without adult supervision The number of participants would be restricted too approximately 100 under this proposal (an expansion of this number could be accommodated as funding and demand). We propose a gallery be provided for visitors and significant others, VIPs etc.. A detailed proposal of this event is available upon request. i 6 -� AI I sponsors will be mentioned at prize giveaways, raffles and tournaments. • Standard Package: o Cost= provide prizes (minimum of one prize value $50 US) o Advertisement on the sponsor page in the form of a link and logo. • Bronze Package: o Cost = $50.00 US per event o Advertisement in the form of a 110 x 60 banner on the event web site (banner must be provided by the sponsor- limit file size to approximately 9k please). • Silver Package: o Cost = $100.00 per event o Advertisement in the form of a 350 x (banner must be provided by the sponsor - limit file size to approximately 12k please), and a single leaf -let brochure in the welcome packet (sponsor must provide materials). • Gold Package: o Cost = $150.00 per event and must provide (2) prizes [minimum prize value $50 US] o Advertisement in the form of a 468 x 60, located at the header of each page rotating (banner must be provided by the sponsor - limit file size to approximately 12 k please), and a triple leaf -let brochure in the welcome packet (sponsor must provide materials). • Platinum Package: o Cost = $200.00 per event and must provide (4) prizes [minimums prize value $50 US] o .Advertisement in the form of a 468 x 60, located at the header of each page rotating (banner must be provided by the sponsor - limit file size to approximately 12 k please), and a two page advertisement or brochure in the welcome packet (sponsor must provide materials). o Sponsor table on site free (sponsor must provide materials and staff) L Hutchinson Fire Department 205 3` Ave SE Hutchinson MN 55350 May 26, 2000 To: Mayor and City Council From: Brad Emans Re: Rescue Vehicle Bid Opening In order not rush into anything that we will sorry for at a later date I have instructed the rescue vehicle committee to take there time, research all avenues, meet with manufactures and come up with a new approach to the problem of cost overrun on this project. I can tell you there are very concerned about losing the funding for this project if they do not get bids in soon. I hope you do not object but I assured them it was far more important to the city of Hutchinson to get the best bang for the buck than to meet any time deadline on this project! It has become very apparent that we will not be taking possession of this vehicle until the spring of 2001. Therefore we have NO date set at the present time for bid opening. Please contact me direct with any questions at 234 -4211. Thank You. 7 -A HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE • 206 MAIN STREET NORTH. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PHONE: 324587 -5252 • FAx:320 -587 -4752 WEBSITE: WWW.HU7CHINSONCHAMBER.COM EMAIL: HCHAMBER@HUTCHTEL.NET RECEM May 26, 2000 MAY 3 0 2000 City of HuOdtkam 0 The Honorable Marlin Torgerson City of Hutchinson I 11 Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Torgerson, The 26th Annual Arts & Crafts Festival of the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce will be held Friday, September 15, 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday, September 16, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Our Arts & Crafts Task Force would like to request the following: • Use of Library Square Park for arts & craft exhibitors. • Closing of 1st Ave SE between Main Stmt and Hassan Street for Taste of Hutchinson. For emergency purposes the alley behind 101 Park Place will be continued to the south side of the park. No obstructions will be allowed in this area. • Closing of Hassan Street between Washington Ave E to 2nd Ave SE for arts & craft exhibitors. • Closing of the following municipal parking lots Friday morning, September 15 through Saturday, September 16. 1) Corner of Hassan Street and Ist Ave SE for restrooms, garbage, recycling. 2) The gravel lot between 1st Ave SE and 2nd Ave SE for Taste of Hutchinson vendor parking. • Close parking on the East side of Main Street between 1st Ave SE and Washington Ave and along on the South side of Washington Ave between Main Street and Hassan St. All exhibitors receive a parking authorization card. This card identifies vehicles parked in the restricted lots and allows exhibitors to replenish their inventory during the event. If you would like additional information, please contact the Chamber at 587 -5252. Thank you for your help in making the Festival an event of which our community can be proud. Sincerely, Tina Vorlicek • Office Manager &mmdmeet to &wun naV Since 1945... f .MaA& 4 A ALr oan a 6etteu place to tkae, wesk, and & fiwm ao! HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 206 MAIN STREET NORTH, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 PHONE: 320587 -5252 # FAx: 320-587-4752 WEBSTTE: WWW.HUTCHINSONCHAMBER.COM EMAIL: HCHAMBER@HUTCHTEL.NET RECEp,;M May 26, 2000 Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Plotz, MAY 3 0 2000 Clty of HuWlkls The 26th Annual Arts & Crafts Festival of the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce will be held Friday, September 15, 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday, September 16, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. We have contacted Mayor Torgerson, the Hutchinson Police Department, the Park and Recreation Department and the Street Department for their assistance. If you have any questions, please call the Chamber at 587 -5252. The Hutchinson Ambassadors also wish to reserve all concession rights in the downtown area as well as the control of any and all food exhibitors for the Taste of Hutchinson. The Ambassadors have an agreement with MainStreet- Hutchinson regarding the operation of the Popcorn Wagon during the event. Thank you for your cooperation and for all the help you've provided in the past. Sincerely, Tina Vorlicek Office Manager ..�I��WWl�1►.. �!� &vnm&n& - d CO eCUll uuat# Since 1948.. Makln#RIdchimon. alean place t4 f me, W4XA, and da. BJwbw6 J • PUBLICATION NO. 6174 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 00 -20 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: May 25, 2000 The City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will receive bids at the Office of the City Administrator, 111 Hassan St SE, Hutchinson MN, until 10:00 am on, Friday, June 9th, 2000, for the making of the following described local improvement under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429: Project No. 00-20: South Grade Road SW from School Road SW to Dale Street SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and trail and appurtenances; 9 all in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering. Immediately following expiration of the time for receiving bids, the City Administrator and Director of Engineering will publicly open bids, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center. The Council, will consider said bids at 6:00 pm on Monday, June 12th, 2000 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center. The approximate major quantities of work involved are: ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 21" Sanitary Sewer LF 2,000 Common Excavation Cu Yd 17,000 Aggregate Base Cu Yd 6,000 HV Wear Course Bituminous Mixture Ton 460 LV Non Wear Course Bituminous Mixture Ton 2,300 15 ", 18" Storm Sewer Ft 1,800 4" Sidewalk Sq Ft 4,800 3" Bituminous Walk Sq Ft 15,000 8618 Concrete Curb and Gutter Ft 4,300 Preformed Striping Ft. 4,000 Sodding Sq Yd 8,000 All bids shall be made on the Proposal Forms of the City and shall be accompanied by a cashiers check, bid bond or certified check, payable to the order of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, for not less than five percent (5 %) of the amount bid. All checks or bid bonds will be held for thirty (30) days or until a contract is signed. Subsequent to that time, all non - forfeited checks or bid bonds will be returned to the bidders. Q —4 PUBLICATION NO. 6174 LETTING NO. 71PROJECT NO. 00-20 PAGE 2 All bids shall also be accompanied by the required Insurance Certificates as noted in the specifications, and Certificate of Compliance with the Minnesota Workers Compensation Law. Bids shall be directed to the Director of Engineering, securely sealed and endorsed upon the outside wrapper "LETTING NO. 71PROJECT NO. 00 -20 ". The City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and to waive any informalities and irregularities. Copies of the Plans, Specifications and Proposal Forms are on file and are available from the Office of the Director of Engineering, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350, and will be fumished on request to any prospective bidder upon payment of $53.25 per set (NOW REFUNDABLE) The successful bidder will be furnished free of charge, additional adequate number of specifications. Irar� n. rlarz/ Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 1ST, 2000, AND IN THE CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN ON FRIDAY, JUNE 2ND, 2000. • RESOLUTION NO. 11495 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING &D AND AWARDING CONTRACT LETTING NO.7 PROJECT NO. 00-20 Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the improvement of Project No. 00-20: South Grade Road SW from School Road SW to Dale Street SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and trail and appurtenances; and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Amount Bid Duininck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN $742,540.32 Quam Construction Company Inc of Willmar MN $776,82925 Wm. Mueller & Sons Inc of Hamburg MN $787,932.69 D & C Dozing of Montevideo MN $825,806.82 Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson MN $874,931.80 and whereas, it appears that Dulninck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: go 1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter Into a contract with Duininck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN, In the amount of $742,540.32, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the Director of Engineering. 2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the contract. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000. Administrator • Is) IV4 To: Hutchinson City Council Prepared By: Julie Wivchnack, AICP, Director of Planning/ZoningBuilding Date: June 7, 2000 — Meeting Date June 12, 2000 Applicant: Wal -Mart Stores, property owner Property Location: North and Northeast of Wal -Mart Store, West of State Highway 15 Brief Description The Wal Mart Plat which was approved in May needs to be revised based, on review by the County. The property is abstract and torrens. The County is requesting that the abstract and torrens areas be divided into separate lots. llu County is also requesting a new name for the plat Staff has prepared a revised resolution for your consideration. CC: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2001 SE 10° Street, Bentonville AR 720712 -6489 Greg Frank, Mccombs, Frank, Roos 11 0 MAW 0 LL-MART SUBD "ION 2ND ADE — mc cc 37Cl2 K MA EXCEP110N _ � R I u SM'Y'lrE .f! - s � �A trH'u t I n I - i g _ 4CP �L ��'.- T.• 0 REVISED RESOLUTION NO. 11453 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS WAL- MART SUBDIVISION 2" ADDITION LOCATED NORTH OF DENVER AVENUE AND EAST OF PROPOSED MARKE STREET WHERE AS, Wal -mart Stores Inc., have submitted a final plat to be known as WAL -MART SUBDIVISION 2n ADDITION of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and wit; WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to- Existing Legal Description: Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 of Paden 1' Addition is Lot 1, Block 3 of Paden 1" Addition Lot 1, Block 1 of Wal -mart Subdivision New Legal Description: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 1, Wal -Mart Subdivision 2" Addition, McLeod County, Minnesota BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That said final plat of WAL -MART SUBDIVISION 2n ADDITION is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following conditions: The applicant must execute the developer's agreement prior to commencement of construction. 2. The applicantlowner is responsible for all construction costs associated with the new streets (Market and Boston.). 3. The applicant must hold a preconstruction meeting with the City. • 4. The City must obtain a deed to the property for the street prior to work W I Revised Resolution No. 11453 Final Plat — Wal -mart Subdivision June 12, 2000 Page 2 commencing on Market Street. 5. The applicant must execute the maintenance agreement within the document of a drainage and utility easement to vacated portions of Boston Street and Baltimore Avenue. 6. Champion Auto shall have one access onto the new portion of Boston Street and maintain an access point onto Baltimore Avenue. Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin Torgerson Mayor 0 Memorandum To: Mayor & City Council CC: From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Date: June 6, 2000 Re: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING BROCHURE WITH PROCEDURE AND PRACTICES The attached brochure is a draft that was reviewed by the staff and directors. Its purpose is to assist the public in understanding the process and proceedings at a City Council meeting. 0 The intent is to include the brochure in public hearing notices for improvements. A similar brochure is being developed for the Planning Commission meetings. /mjs Attachment �--7) Hutcon City Staff City Administrator .....................Gary Plotz Directors of: Economic Development ................ Christie Rode Engineering/ Public Works ..............John Rodeberg Finance. . ... ....... ...... Kenneth Merrill Fire Services .................. &ad Emans Liquor Store ...................Neil Wegner Parks/Recreation/ Community Education ......... Doff Moon Planning /Building Enforcement .............Jdie Wischnack Police/Emergency Management Services ...................Steven Madson WaterANastewater ....... Randy DeVries City Attorneys. . ................ ..... Marc Sebora Richard Schieffer Human Resources ................Brenda Ewing Motor vehicle Deputy Registrar... ...................... Marilyn Had Contact Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson regarding agenda scheduling/ questions at 320 - 2344202. For more bdtomradon about On City of Hutchinson and dw Cny Council Meetings, Including recent meeting m1nutes, contact our websit www.cl.hutctdnsmmn.us. / Ir a at City Counci &tangs Second and fourth Tuesday, 5:30 p.m. City Council Workshops Scheduled as needed. Normally held at 4:00 p.m. on Council meeting dates. City Center Hours Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Hutchinson City Officials Mayor ...... .........................Martin Torgerson (H) 587 -3243 (0) 2344479 Council Members ..................James Haugen (H)587 -8425 Duane Hoversten (H) 587 -7570 John Minar (H) 587 -8263 Kay Peterson (H) 587 -2348 Hutchmmon, Mumesotn 55350 (320) 587 -5151 • Fax (320) 234 -4240 www.cLhutchimon.mn.us F-DA webske: www.hutchinsoneds.com Welcoine t o t HUTCHINSON CITY CouNcm MEErnNG Coy Oj" I N'el� this Hutchinson City Council tnee; Input from the residents is Important This brochure will help you to understand the process and procedures for this meeting. Meeting Times The Hutchinson City Council regularly meets on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Center. The mayor serves as the presiding officer. The mayor and council members each have a single vote. Three members constitute a quorum. Most council motions require a majority vote for passage. The council also holds frequent workshop meetings. Most are held at 4:00 p.m. prior to the regular council meeting. These workshops are scheduled during preceding council meetings. All meetings, unless otherwise noted, are open to the public. All regular council meetings are broadcast live and replayed on Hutchinson Cable Video Network (HCVN) Channel 10. Procedures • Copies of the meeting agenda are available just outside the entrance to the Council Chambers. • Do you wish to address the council on an agenda item? Typically, the mayor will ask for public comments when appropriate. To address the council, approach the podium and state your name and address for the record using the microphone provided. The Agen* Special Matters — deals with items such as awards, prodamations, special recognition, etc. Minutes — acceptance and approval of the minutes from the council and other proceedings such as bid openings. Consent Agenda — covers routine administrative matters and may include recommended planning commission items. These items are not discussed, and may all be approved as recommended on the staff reports. The mayor will provide an opportunity for a council member or citizen to ask that an item be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items pulled will receive separate action. All items not removed from the Consent Agenda will be approved by a single motion of the council. Public Hearing - held as a separate Item of business on the agenda, generally commencing at 6:00 p.m. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the council how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • Staff makes presentation regarding the hearing item • Council members ask questions for clarification • Mayor opens hearing to the public • Council discusses the item • Council takes action When you are called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the counA continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. For some items requiring a public hearing (i.e. street Improvement projects, street construction projects, sewer projects, assessment hearings) an informational meeting may be held prior to the council meeting. The affected property owners will be notif led of the meetings by the Engineering/Public Works department. Communications, Requests and Petitions — requests, reports and presentations to the council that may or may not require any action. Unfinished Business — agenda items continued from previous council meeting(s). New Business — items intended primarily fc council discussion and action. The mayor has the discretion as to what, if any, public comments will be heard on these items. Miscellaneous — provides the council members and staff to report on items which directly or indirectly relate to the city. Individuals who wish to address the council on subjects that are not part of the meeting agenda may do so. Typically, the council wil not take action on items presented at this time, but will refer them to staff for review, action and /or recommendation for further council action. Claims, Appro"tions and Contract Payments — action is taken to approve and authorize payment of city bills and purchaser Your input is welcome and your participation is appreciated Memorandmi To: Mayor & City Council CC: Ken Merrill, Finance Director Philip G. Graves, President HAHC Dolf Moon, Director of PRCE Vi Mayer, Executive Director Chamber of Commerce From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Dab: June 7, 2000 Re: REQUIREMENT FOR PREDESIGN UNDER MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE FOR COMMUNITY CENTER GRANT . Mr. Jerry Winter, of the Department of Trade and Economic Development, has informed the City that a predesign manual pursuant to the attached is required before grant approval. Secondly, the Minnesota Department of Finance requires substantiation that a one- for -one state/local valid match has been obtained. Concerning the predesign, the guidelines indicate on page 22, section 6.2, that the cost for preparing the predesign may be up to $10,000. It is recommended that we solicit proposals from area/local architectural firms to assist us in meeting the guidelines in the predesign manual. � f ; n �J Predesign Manual for Capital Budget Projects • Revised June 1997 • �-E- V • TABLE OF CONTENTS page # SUMMARY v SECTION 1 CO 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 SECTION 2 CONTEXT FOR PREDESIGN 11 2.1 What Comes before Predesign 2.2 Design Stage Definition 2.3 What Signals the End of Predesign 2.4 What Is the Relationship of Predesign to the First Point of Major Funding 2.5 What Is the Role of Predesign as Defined by the Law MPONENTS OF PREDESIGN Predesign Summary Statement Project Background Narrative Financial Information- Capital Expenditures Financial Information -Ongoing Operating Expenditures Schedule Information Project Description SECTION 3 COST PLANNING IS A KEY ELEMENT OF PREDESIGN 17 3.1 Basis for Cost Planning 3.2 Cost Planning Versus Cost Estimating 3.3 Cost Plan Chart of Accounts • 3.4 Capital Budget Chart of Accounts 3.5 Capital Budget Request Construction Type of Space Listing SECTION 4 MOST USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF PREDESIGN 21 SECTION 5 EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN 23 PREDESIGN SECTION 6 EX 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 APPENDIX ECUTION OF PREDESIGN Who Performs Predesign Cost of Predesign How Predesign Is Paid for Results of Predesign 25 GLOSSARY A: Minnesota Statutes 16B.241 B: Capital Request Project Costs Form C: Capital Budget Request Construction Cost Detail Form D: Inflation Factor Table E: Operating Costs Form F: Minnesota Statutes 16A.695 G: Minnesota Statutes 1613.335 H: Minnesota Statutes 15.95 27 47 Page 6 • SUMMARY Predesign is a systematic planning process intended to improve the overall statewide building design, construction and operational process. Predesign follows the strategic and operational needs of an agency while it precedes all design and construction stages. The main premise of predesign is to communicate essential project objectives with factual data before the actual design process commences. Predesign is typically calculated at or less than one -half of one percent of the total overall estimated project cost and the project scope is well defined before the majority of capital finds are requested, appropriated, and committed. Predesign tests project feasibility by ex aminin g and answering the following questions • What need does the proposed facility fill as defined by the requesting agency's long- term strategic plan? • What are the project capital costs? • What is the proposed project schedule when the funding sequence schedule for • legislative action on capital budgets is considered? To answer the foregoing questions, predesign should be completed for each project. The following are the components of predesign: 1. A predesign summary statement. 2. Project background narrative: • Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the project's operational program. • Summary of the requesting agency's own operational program for the project. • Summary of the requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process. 3. Financial information: • Proposed project cost plan. • Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets. 4. Schedule information: • Proposed project schedule. • Proposed funding sequence. 40 page 1 5. Project description: ArchitecturaUengineering program. Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated into the project. The preceding components are explained in this predesign manual. A predesign requirement has been added to Minnesota Statutes 1613.335, the statute upon which this manual is based. The Department of Administration is implementing the predesign requirement on applicable projects that received appropriations in or since the 1994 Legislative Session. Questions regarding this document may be directed to the Department of Administration at (612) 282 -5005 (Mr. Wes Chapman). Examples of Suggested Appropriation Language for Different Stages of Capital Projects 1. An appropriation for predesign only might read: This appropriation is for the execution of predesign only. The $300.000 agency will be expected to make submittals for M.S. 1613.335, Subdivision 3. • The predesign will develop a report establishing the needs for a new Marine Education Center at the Minnesota Zoo to assist it in "strengthening the bond between people and the living earth." The project will focus on creating a facility that will support the education of the public about marine environments. Increases in operating expenses brought about by this project will be home by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund. (additional language as required) 2. An appropriation for design only following the execution of predesign might read: This appropriation is for the execution of all design stages. The $1,950,000 agency will be expected to make submittals for M.S. 16B.335, Subdivision 1. (additional language as required) Page 2 • 3. An appropriation for construction only following the execution of predesign and design might read: This appropriation is for the execution of the construction stage. $20,500,000 (additional language as required) 4. An appropriation for both design and construction following the execution of predesign might read: This appropriation is for the execution of design and construction $22,500,000 construction stages. The agency will be expected to make submittals for M.S. 1613.335, Subdivision 1. (additional language as required) • Page 3 1. COMPONENTS OF PREDESIGN 0 The components of predesign are: t. A predesign summary statement: • ?. paragraph that clearly summarizes the scope of work, the cost plan. and the anticipated project schedule. 2. Project background narrative: • Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the project's operational program. • Summary of the agency's own approved operational program for the project. • Summary of the agency's needs analysis and planning process. 3. Financial information - capital expenditures: • Proposed project cost plan. • Operating budget impact. 4. Financial Information- ongoing operating expenditures: • • Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets (state agencies). • Summary of proposed operating revenues and expenditures (nonstate agencies and grants). i. Schedule inforration: • Proposed project schedule. • Proposed funding sequence if applicable. 6. Project description: • .Architecturai/engineering program. • Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated into the project. Page 4 • Considered individually and in more detail, the components art;: 1.1 PREDESIGN SUMMARY STATEMENT • The summary statement will be composed of a project name and usually a four sentence (or less) project description. The predesign summary statement is a description that will stay with the project through its completion and occupancy. This statement could serve as the introductory paragraph to both the appropriation language and the project description section of the Capital Budget Request Forms. The description detail should be expanded as appropriate for each subsequent appropriation request. Sample Evolution of Predesign Summary Statements 1. Marine Education Center: • At the beginning of a project, predesign should frame a project without the constraints of cost or scale. A summary statement for a predesign (only) capital budget request might appear in this manner: The project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between • people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement. The project will focus on creating a facility that will support the education of the public about marine environments. Increases in operating expenses brought about by this project will be bome by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund. • At the completion of predesign, there should be a range of costs associated with scope of work and a general time frame for the project. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has completed predesign might appear in this manner: This project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement. The existing 191.000 gsf facility will be expanded by remodeling and new construction. The changed facility will include new pools for six dolphins, regular and wet classrooms, an indoor dolphin theater, shark exhibits, and a reception area for revenue - generating events. An anticipated $800.000 in increased operating expenses will be supported by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund. New space: 42.500- 46,000 gsf Remodeled space: 4,200 -5,700 gsf Anticipated project cost range: $18.425 million- $20.575 million Anticipated substantial completion and occupancv: Mid 1997 0 Page 5 • At the time a project is ready to go to bid, specific numbers should identify project size, cost goals, and delivery date. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has completed predesign and design might appear in this manner. This project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement. The existing 191,000 gsf facility will be expanded by remodeling and new construction. The improved facility will include new pools for six dolphins along with isolation and neonatal pools, two regular and three wet classrooms, an indoor dolphin theater with a 1,500 person seating capacity, eight shark exhibits, and a reception area for 300 people with adjacent catering kitchen for revenue generating events. An anticipated $847,000 in increased operating expenses will be provided by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund upon project completion in FY 1997. New space: 45,900 gsf Remodeled space: 5,510 gsf Estimated project cost: $20.500 million Estimated substantial completion and occupancy: August 1997 2. Humanities Commission Headquarters: • At the beginning of a project, predesign should flame a project without the constraints • of cost or scale. A summary statement for a predesign (only) capital budget request might appear in this manner. The project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities Commission's mission statement. The project will focus on the revitalization of an historic hospital building donated to the commission by the city of St. Paul. Approximately one -half of the construction costs will be requested for capital funding by the state of Minnesota. • At the completion of predesign, there should be a range of costs associated with scope of work and a general time frame for the project. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has completed predesign might appear in this manner. This project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities Commission's mission statement. The hospital has been evaluated for structural matters and found to be in need of no improvements. The existing structure offers an excellent fit between the programmatic needs of the commission and the general layout of each of the two existing floors. It Page 6 . is felt that there is no need to add to the facility. The upper floor will house the a dministra tive offices, dieting room, and classrooms, while the lower floor will serve as the housing component for the programs offered. Cost for the construction will be divided between a request for capital funds from the Legislature and private sources. The increased operating expenses of the facility are estimated to be $150,000 that will be covered by the commission in its operating budget. Remodeled space: 22,000 gsf Anticipated project cost range: $2.54 million Anticipated substantial completion and occupancy: Mid 1995 • At the time a project is ready to go to bid, specific numbers should identify project size, cost goals, and delivery date. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has completed predesign and design might appear in this manner: This project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities Commission's mission statement. The upper floor will house the administrative suite of three offices, reception room, and conference room. A dining room with capacity for 125 people and kitchen will be • located centrally to serve as a focus for interaction- Five classrooms, that will accommodate 15 students each, will be located in the eastern wing of the main floor. The lower floor will serve as the housing component, consisting of 45 single rooms with a central lounge and laundry facility. The entire facility will meet all applicable codes and incorporate new mechanical and electrical systems. The anticipated operating cost increase, beyond current levels, is estimated to be $110.000 in FY 1994 -95 and $280,000 in FY 1996 -97. Remodeled space: 22,000 gsf Estimated project cost: $2.500 million Estimated substantial completion and occupancy: February 1995 1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND NARRATIVE Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the operational program: This listing should focus on the legislation that supports or demands the development of the project either directly or in the form of the creation of programs requiring physical accommodations and not simply indicate the appropriation that provided funding for predesign. This is an opportunity to indicate the effect of expanding programs, sentencing guidelines, or other directives creating the need to provide appropriate Facilities. 40 Page 7 Summary of the requesting agency's own approved operational program for the project: The requesting agency should provide the operational program to be supported by the facility. The program should clearly identify the basic elements of what it is that will be done, how, to whom, by whom, with what in terms of resources, and the results anticipated and not record physical facility requirements. Summary of the requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process for the project: The requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process should define alternative ways that were considered to meet the project's operational program requirements. Alternatives may include using existing space, adapting existing space, performing new construction, or leasing space. Collocation with other agencies for projects outside of the metropolitan area must also be considered and a determination made and explained (see Appendix A). When alternatives have been defined, a preferred alternative should be selected that maximizes program suitability and minimiz first cost and life cycle costs. The nature and breadth of participation by user groups within the organization should be clearly indicated. 1.3 FINANCIAL INFORMATION CAPITAL EXPENDITURES: 1. Proposed project cost plan: A budget using a chart of accounts with categories identified in Sections 33 and 3.4 and following the formats shown in Appendix B and C should be provided. Costs indicated in Appendix C should be divided into various construction types in Appendix B according to categories indicated in Section 3.5. The source of these costs should be clearly identified. The mflation factors required in Appendix C are found in Appendix D. • Actual cost histories, adiusted for program variations, that support the proposed budget should be included if available. 1.4 FIN ANCIAL INFORMATION ONGOING OPERATING EXPENDITURES Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets (for state agencies): An estimate of project effects on operating budgets including statfing levels and corresponding salaries and building repair, replacement. and maintenance should be included This information should follow the format of information supplied in the capital budget request forms (see Appendix E). • Summary of proposed operating revenues and expenditures (nonstate agencies and grants): A five -year estimate of operating budgets that identifies major categories of expenditures and identifies associated revenue sources. if revenue sources include fee Page 8 • generated revenue, a full description of these fees and the assumptions used in making the projections and their justifications should be provided (see Appendix F). 1.5 SCHEDULE INFORMATION Proposed project schedule: Predesign should include a realistic schedule for all stages of the project. Site selection and acquisition, required government actions and proceedings at all levels, designer selection, design approvals, construction, occupancy, and commencement of operations ( commissioning) should all be included (if applicable). • Proposed funding sequence: The schedule should include a funding sequence for the project that reconciles the agency's needs with the alternate year capital budget cycle if the project will receive funds from more than one appropriation cycle. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Architecttnai/engmeenng program: At least a summary level architectural/ engineering program should be included Current conditions, adjacencies, special spatial issues, and user needs should be noted where appropriate. • Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated into the project: Cost - effective information technology investments and telecommuting plans that would enable an agency to reduce its need for office space, provide more services electronically, and decentralize its services should be provided (see Appendix G and IT). Notification from the Information Policy Office (IPO) of the Department of Administration that such plans are or are not required shall be included. ArchitecturaVEngineering Program Definitions 1. Types of Programs: • The architectural/engineering program ( "a/e program ") compiles instructions to the design professionals. The nature and extent of the instructions required are specific to the project. • Projects that have been built heretofore should not require an original program if the previous work is still applicable. The existing are program can be used to direct the design professionals. • On the other hand, unique projects by definition require new instructions to guide the design professionals. If the project is unique but simple and not costly, the are program can probably be completed with the predesign work. • At the other end of the spectrum, however, if the project is unique. complex, and relatively costly, then the a/e program should be generally described during the • Page 9 predesign stage and the details added during schematic design. In this case. the capital budget request should include finding for the detailed are program with the design work but should be developed with the constraints established in predesign. • The processes utilized to establish the program should strive to include methodologies that strive to establish the greatest client consensus possible. These should be clearly documented as a part of the program document. 2. Components of an ArchitecturaUEngineering Program: • Summary of how the project will meet the requirements of the requesting agency's strategic plan and operational program for the project. • Summary of existing applicable master plans or other areawide (urban design, architectural, or engineering) plans pertaining to the project. • Definition of needs. • The a/e program should define human and operational needs to be met by the project. • Needs are derived from the operational program, programming interaction with potential users, new or existing research, and standards for architecturallengineering practice. The processes for deriving these needs should be clearly identified and explained. • Site selection criteria and site selection. • If site selection has not been performed before predesign, then selection criteria should be developed and site selection may be made during the predesign period. • If schematic design of alternative solutions is both desired and highly dependent on site characteristics, then final site selection may occur during schematic design and only the selection criteria identified as part of predesign. • Selection criteria should include collocation opportunities with other agencies. • Audit of existing building's physical condition • If the project involves modification of an existing building, the conditions to be changed should be recorded. For example, if an existing building needs modifications to meet code requirements for its intended use, then the required improvements should be listed. • Differences from similar building types. • If the proposed project is different from similar, well understood building types, the Page 10 • differences should be highlighted. For example, if administrative offices are proposed to have an unusually high potential for internal lavout change, the type of changes expected should be defined. • Design standards, guidelines, and performance characteristics for site and building systems. • The performance characteristics of physical components of the project should be described. For example, with respect to heating, ventilation_ and air conditioning performance: the inside summer and winter temperatures to be maintained, the acceptable relative humidity range, and the outside fresh air ventilation rate should all be defined. • Individual space requirements. • Size and characteristics of required spaces and rooms should be tabulated. • Space and room adjacency requirements should be recorded. • Special characteristics of rooms should be recorded. • Extracts from the project budget and schedule that may apply to the work by design professionals. • Bibliography of applicable codes, standards, cited research, and other publications referenced in the program. Current issues as applicable building codes, sun charts, and building air quality guidelines are assumed. Page l l 2. CONTEXT FOR PREDESIGN 2.1 WHAT COMES BEFORE PREDESIGN Agency planting precedes predesign: Agency planning that precedes predesign is not bondable because it is not project specific. After agency plannin B, the project process has three bondable stages (see Figure 1): • Predesign. • Design. • Construction. Agency Planning Strategic Operational Program Bondable Activities Needs Analysis and Planning Master Plan Others i I Predeslyn Non-Bondable Activities Design Schematic Design Development contredt Documents construction Administration Construction Bidding Construction Otxupency Figure 1: Project Stages Agency planning that precedes predesign includes: • Agency strategic planning: Agencies are required in their capital requests to define the long -term needs that drive capital budget requests. Long -tetra needs should relate to the agency's total need for capital appropriations in the six -year cycle under consideration. • Project operational programming: The project operational program springs from the Page 12 requesting agency's strategic planning and defines in functional and organizational terms what the facility must do. The agencv should anticipate future changes in the present operation for changes to be accommodated in altered or new facilities. However, the program does not record physical facility requirements; the program describes what activities the proposed facility will support. • Needs analysis and planning: During the needs analysis and planning process, the requesting agency estimates the amount and type of space required to satisfy the operational program requirement. It also surveys its inventory of existing space to identify alternative ways to meet its requirements. When surveying its space inventory, the requesting agency should answer two questions: a. Is existing space available to meet the program requirements? If the answer is yes, then reusing existing space is an alternative way to satisfy the program requirements. b. Is existing space, worthy of reinvestment, available for adaption to meet the program requirement'? If the answer is yes, then adapting existing space should also be considered an alternative way to satisfy the program. In addition to using or adapting existing space, other alternatives such as leasing space or new construction should be considered. Collocating with another agency is a required alternative for projects outside of the metropolitan area. When alternative methods for satisfying the operational program requirements have been determined, a preferred alternative should be selected. Primary selection criteria are program suitability, lowest first cost, and lowest life cycle cost. Review of area, neighborhood. or campus master plans or other plans that may affect the project: Project decisions should be made with the requirements of existing plans in mind. These plans may include campus or area master plans or other plans prepared and enforced by local levels of government. • Identification of sites and definition of site selection criteria: Though alternative sites should be identified and selection criteria proposed before predesign, actual site selection may occur before predesign, during predesign, or as late as schematic design. • Designation of applicable information technology: Before predesign begins, both the type of information technology to be incorporated into the project and the telecommuting plan for the facility should be defined. The desired results of these plans should be determined. For example, questions such as: "What is the effect of telecommuting on the size of full-time, on -site staff?" should be answered. • Page 13 2.2 DESIGN STAGE DEFINITION Design follows predesign. Predesign defines the design problem to be solved. Design solves the problem. The deliverables of the three stages of the design process are described below: 1. Schematic design: The results of this stage are: • a site lavout that satisfies the requirements of existing codes and ordinances and the physical attributes of the site. • an organization of the space list into two - dimensional plans and three - dimensional stacking diagrams conforming to codes and the requirements of the architectural/engineering program • alternative schemes and a recommended preferred alternative that depict the general relationships of spaces and the relationship of the building(s) to the site. The deliverables of the schematic design stage are: • diagrammatic site plan. • diagrammatic plan layout. • diagrammatic building elevations. • diagrammatic longitudinal and transverse sections. • outline specifications describing all physical systems including mechanical and electrical systems. • updated project cost plan. 2. Design Development: The results of this stage are: • a site plan that satisfies the requirements of existing codes and ordinances and the physical attributes of the site. • building plans. elevations, and sections defining all two - and three - dimensional relationships. • building plans, elevations, and sections depicting basic material and physical system selections. . Page 14 0 The deliverables of the design development stage are: • site plans drawn to scale. • plans, elevations, sections, and details drawn to scale depicting all physical systems. • perspective drawings or models as required to explain the proposed design. • revised outline specifications describing all physical systems including mechanical and electrical systems. • updated project cost plan. 3. Contract documents: The results of this stage are drawing and specifications suitable to be contract documents for the project. The deliverables of the construction document stage are: • certified, detailed drawings and specifications sufficient to bid, buy, and construct the project. • certified drawings and specifications that the local code officials will issue a building permit. • detailed cost estimate demonstrating that the work defined by the contract documents can be performed within the project budget. 4. Construction administration: 2.3 WHAT SIGNALS THE END OF PREDESIGN The boundary between predesign and design is marked by the completion of instructions to design professionals (the architects and engineers) in a form sufficient to support commencement of schematic design. These instructions are the architecturai/engineering program. A complete definition of the architectural/engineering program is found in Section 1.6. • Page 15 2.4 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP OF PREDESIGN TO THE FIRST MAJOR FUNDING From the view point of the requesting agency, the question is: "What is the earliest time that it makes sense to ask for capital funding for a project ?" From the view point of the Legislature, the question is: "When can we understand the proposed project well enough so that an informed decision by the governor and legislature can be made?' A capital budget request can be made before predesign or it can be deferred until predesign is complete. Not all projects with completed predesign will be funded for design and construction. Nevertheless, the results of predesign provide essential information to elected officials while minimizin cost to the requesting agency. This information forms the basis for a decision whether a project should receive additional funding for design and construction. Therefore, it is not logical to expect the Legislature to fund all three project stages at one time. 2.5 WHAT IS THE ROLE OF PREDESIGN AS DEFINED BY THE LAW Minnesota Statute 166.335, Subdivision 3, requires the results of predesign to be submitted to the Department of Administration before commencing design (see Appendix G). The Department of Administration will review the results and make a recommendation to the appropriate chair of the Senate Finance Committee and the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee with a copy to the chair of the House Capital Investment Committee. The Department of Administration will examine the predesign results for completeness before performing its review. Completion of the projecPs operational program by the requesting agency will be a prerequisite for consideration and a favorable recommendation by the Department of Administration. Page 16 0 3. COST PLANNING IS A KEY ELEMENT OF 3.1 BASIS FOR COST PLANNING Cost planning is based on the principle that new project budget ranges should be derived from analysis of historical data for similar projects. If the proposed project costs do not follow historical cost patterns, then the reasons should be determined and explained in the proposed project budget. 3.2 COST PLANNING VERSUS COST ESTIMATING Cost planning is different from cost estimating. Cost planning occurs very early in the planning process before designs have been prepared. Cost planting relies on historical data and predicts all costs to be attributed to the project. It answers the question: "Within what range will the project budget fall after the project is fully designed ?" Cost estimating starts after the design work has begun. usually during the design development stage. Cost estimating is based on measuring material quantities actually shown in the design and deals with construction costs. It measures only the project actually described in the drawings and specifications. Estimating answers the question: "What is the estimated cost of the building as described in these plans and specifications ?" 33 COST PLAN CHART OF ACCOUNTS The project's cost plan should contain all project costs for a funding request. The capital budget chart of accounts recommended for use during predesign is as follows: 1. Property Acquisition. 2. Predesign Fees. 3. Design Fees. 4. Project Management. 5. Construction Costs. 6. One Percent for Art (if applicable). 7. Occupancy. 8. Inflation. 9. Other. (See Appendices B and C for detail.) Relocation costs are included in item 49 and funded from the general fund and not bond sales. Information regarding the Chart of Accounts will be presented when the Capital Budget Instructions are prepared and forwarded to the agencies in advance of each bonding cycle. i Page 17 3.4 CAPITAL BUDGET CHART OF ACCOUNTS 0 All costs are to be quoted as of June l of the odd year prior to the even year that the Governor and Legislature will consider the request. 1. Property acquisition: • Land, land easements, options. • Land and building. 3. Predesign fees. 3. Design: • Schematic design. • Design development. • Contract documents. • Construction administration. 4. Project management: • State staff project management. • Construction management. • Other. 5. Construction costs: • Site and building preparation. • Demolitionidecommissioning. • Construction (see project detail in capital budget forms item #5). • Infrastructure /roads/utilities. • Hazardous material abatement. • Other. • Construction contingency (unforeseeable issues only). 6. Percent for art (if applicable). Occupancy: • Furniture fixtures and equipment (not otherwise included in item 5). • Telecommunications (voice & data). • Security Equipment. • Commissioning. 8. Inflation (Items 1 -7): Page 18 • Midpoint of construction (date). • Department of Finance Multiplier (percentl. • Inflation cost. 9. Other (explain): • Relocation Cost (funded from the General Fund) 3.5 CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF SPACE LISTING • Monumental office buildings. • Office buildings. • Computer facilities. • Library facilities. • Auditorium. • Cafetena/food service. • Medical facilities. • Parking structures. • Warehouse facilities. • Laboratories. • Higher education teaching/classrooms. • • Office/adminis Teachingilaboratories. • Maintenance facilities. • Heating/cooling plants. • Utility infrastructure facilities. Is Page 19 4. MOST USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF PREDESIGN ! Predesign is most useful for projects with the following characteristics: • Unique projects (one -of -a -kind, or fast -of -a- kind). • Complex projects (projects containing many interactive parts or systems). • Relatively costly projects. • Projects with unusually aggressive or complicated schedules (phased construction or fast track construction). All capital projects benefit by the clarity and condensation resulting from predesign. However, predesign for relatively simple and low cost projects can easily be accomplished with relatively little time, money, and effort. Page 20 • 5. EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN PREDESIGN The architecturaUengmeenng program ( "aie program") compiies instructions to the design professionals. The nature and extent of the instructions required are specific ro the project. Projects that have been built heretofore should not require an original program if the previous work is still applicable. The existing ate program can be used to direct the design professionals. On the other hand, unique projects by definition require new instructions to guide the design professionals. If the project is unique but simple and not costly, the aie program can proiiably be completed with the predesign work. At the other end of the spectrum, however, if the project is unique. complex, and relatively costly, then the ate program should be generally described during the predesign stage and the details added during schematic design. In this case, the capital budget request should include funding for the detailed ate program with the design work, but should be developed with the constraints established in predesign. The processes utilized to establish the program should strive to include methodologies that strive to establish the greatest client consensus possible. These should be clearly docur. anted as a part of the program document. 0 Page 21 6. EXECUTION OF PREDESIGN 6.1 WHO PERFORMS PREDESIGN Depending on the size of the agency, in -house staff may perform the work or the agency may choose to retain consultants. Some design firms (architects) are equipped and staffed to do the work- However, a multidisciplined team should be considered where the project is particularly complex. 6.2 COST OF PREDESIGN For most projects, the target cost for predesign should be one - quarter to one -half of one percent of the combined project design and construction costs. The smaller amount (0.25 percent) applies to large projects (costing more than $3,000,000 to 55,000,000) and the larger amount (0.50 percent) applies to small projects (costing less than $1,000,000 to 52,000.000) or unusual projects. In occasional circumstances higher percentages have been observed due to the relative size of the project and complexity of the anticipated project. Achieving these cost ranges is highly dependent on the agency's completing its agency planning before undertaking predesign. 6.3 HOW PREDESIGN IS PAID FOR Predesign presently qualifies for funding by capital appropriation in the bonding bill. If the agency is unable to await a capital appropriation, then the agency may perform the predesign using its own operating funds. Grant recipients who are required to provide matches for state funds are encouraged to include the cost of predesign within their match portion. 6.4 RESULTS OF PREDESIGN The main result of predesign is a clear definition of a project plan that, if implemented, will meet all project objectives. The project plan is a reconciliation of the agency's operational needs with project financial planning, scheduling, and the requirements of the capital budget legislative process. Page 22 0 APPENDIX • L-1 Page 23 APPENDIX A MINNESOTA STATUTES 16B.241 Sec. 40. [1613.241] COORDINATED FACILITY PLANNING. The commissioner of administration shall develop a coordinated facility planning process for offices located outside the metropolitan area for the following agencies: the departments of health, agriculture, and natural resources; the pollution control agency and the board of water and soil resources. Any proposals for consolidation or construction of facilities for these agencies that are included in budget documents submitted to the legislature under section 16A.11 must fast be considered as part of the planning process required by this section. Page 24 i 0 r APPENDIX B CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST PROJECT COSTS FORM AGENCY CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST Fiscal Years 1998 -2003 Dollars is Thouaods ($137,500 — $138 thousand) CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF SPACE EXIS "PING NEW ('ONS'I'RUC ION REMODELED RENEWAL(%,"I Prescrvatiaa) Lip Major'I'ype of Space (Office, Laboratory, Romp) Gruss Square Fra Grow Sgwre Feet Cost Cost Per Square FoN Gross Square Feet Cop Coat Per Sgaam Faot Craw Sgwre Feet Coil Cost Per Sgare Fuwt 'I tyl Al. COST TOTAL Page 25 APPENDIX C CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST CONSTRUCTION COSTS DETAIL FORM AGENCY CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST Fiscal Years 1998 -2003 Dollars is Thousands ($137,500 - $138 thousand TOTA1. PROJECT COSTS All Yu xnJ All Fm dln S(wrcce Pnjed Carl All Prior Y. Project Cdr F 19"-" Pnjst Ce Y F 2UW UI Prnjen C. r 1 Y. 2UU2 -03 TOTAL COM All Yerrr Projrtr Sun IMux WYuQ Pr�jrel F66h (Mual✓Yor) L Prpwy AcgdWlw Lend, Lard hucmalls, ()nlwn9 _ Land and Buildings SUBTOTAL 2. Preadp Fm SUBTOTAL 1. Duip Fw Schemnic Dmign Dcvclupm Contwl Dacumenu Cpuwction Admnutmion SUBTOTAL A. Prajm mksftz ed Sole SuUPrcjecl Mara cmew Conmmouo Mrm Olhe . SUBTOTAL I Cr rwd. Cdr So. & Duddin Ik alwn DemlhlioVDecpv W Com maion InflrslrvclumJR ®de/llliliues luardous Makrirl Abmnffl M Olhu(cx Win} - ColWSuman Cw tmpwy SUBTOTAL 6. One Peraenl 6r An SUBTOTAL 7. Occuprnry Fumilure, Fialures and F:yul ..i Tdmovrmnicrlioos (voice & dru) Semrity � SUBTOTAL & IaHtlam O len 1 - Mi of Cao 'Ixw(dale) Dagarmwni of Finv Mulli um(pe ) Inf6lioo Coo SUBTOTAL 1. 014r(aap6io) - GRAND TOTAL GRAND TOTAL Page 26 0 0 0 0 APPENDIX D INFLATION FACTOR TABLE J u Midpoint of Dept. of Finance Construction MULTIPLIER June 1997 1.000 July 1997 1.004 August 1997 1.008 September 1997 1.011 October 1997 1.015 November 1997 1.019 December 1997 1.023 January 1998 1.027 February 1998 1.031 March 1998 1.036 April 1998 1.040 May 1998 1.044 June 1998 1.048 July 1998 1.052 August 1998 1.056 September 1998 1.061 October 1998 1.065 November 1998 1.069 December 1998 1.073 January 1999 1.077 February 1999 1.081 March 1999 1.086 April 1999 l .090 May 1999 1.094 June 1999 1.098 July 1999 1.102 August 1999 1.106 September 1999 1.111 October 1999 1.115 November 1999 1. I l9 December 1999 1.123 January 2000 1.127 February 2000 1.131 March 2000 1.136 April 2000 1.140 May 2000 1.144 June 2000 t. 148 Julv 2000 1.152 August 2000 L 156 September 2000 1.161 October 2000 1.165 Nfidpoutt of Dept. of Finance Construction WTLTIPLIER November 2000 1.169 December 2000 1.173 January 2001 1.177 February 2001 1.181 March 2001 1.186 Apnl 2001 1.190 May 2001 1.194 June 2001 1.198 July 2001 1.202 August 2001 1.206 September 2001 1.211 October 2001 1.215 November 2001 1.219 December 2001 1.223 January 2002 1.227 February 2002 1.231 March 2002 1.236 April 2002 1.240 May 2002 1.244 June 2002 1.248 July 2002 1.252 August 2002 1.256 September 2002 1.261 October 2002 1.265 November 2002 1.269 December 2002 1.273 January 2003 1.277 February 2003 1.281 March 2003 1.286 Apn 1 2003 1.290 May 2003 1.294 June 2003 1.298 July 2003 1.302 August 2003 1.306 September 2003 i.3II October 2003 1.315 November 2003 1.319 December 2003 1323 January 2004 1.327 Page 27 0 APPENDIX E CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST STATE OPERATING COSTS FORM 3. CBANGES IN STATE 0"RATING COM I Carreot Cwt he)emd Can (Without Inlliam) F.Y 19W" F.Y. 2000.01 F.Y. 2002-43 F.Y. 2004-05 F.Y. 2006-07 Compuwdon (Progrun and Building Oprndae) O16a Progtun Mewd Expettro Bung Opmtirig Expenm Sm&-( o Lase Evewa ' Noonem-Oweed Load Other Exprn : (rpenfy): Revmte Ofrx TOTAL No. of F.T.E. Penomd Page 28 • APPENDIX F MINNESOTA STATUTES 16A.695 16A.695 PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH STATE BOND PROCEEDS Subdivision 1 Definitions. (a) The definitions in this subdivision apply to this section. (b) "State bond financed property" means property acquired or bettered in whole or in part with the proceeds of state general obligation bonds authorized to be issued under article Yi, section 5, clause (a), of the Minnesota Constitution. (c) "public officer or agency" means a state officer or agency, the University of Minnesota, the Minnesota historical society, and any county, home rule charter or statutory city, school district, special purpose district. or other public entity, or any officer or employee thereof. (d) "Fair market value" means. with respect to the sale of state bond financed property, the price that would be paid by a willing and qualified buyer to a willing and qualified seller as determined by an appraisal of the property, or the price bid by a purchaser under a public bid procedure after reasonable public notice. • (e) "Outstanding state bonds" means the dollar amount certified by the commissioner, upon the request of a public officer or agency, to be the principal amount of state bonds, including any refunding bonds, issued with respect to the state bond financed property, less the principal amount of state bonds paid or defeased before the date of the request. Subd. 2. Leases and management contracts. (a) A public officer or agency that is authorized by law to lease or enter into a management contract with respect to state bond financed property shall comply with this subdivision. (b) The lease or management contract may be entered into for the express purpose of carrying out a governmental program established or authorized by law and established by official action of the contracting public officer or agency, in accordance with orders of the commissioner intended to ensure the legality and tax- exempt status of bonds issued to finance the property, and with the approval of the commissioner. A lease or management contract, including any renewals that are solely at the option of the lessee, must be for a term substantially less than the useful life of the property, but may allow renewal beyond that term upon a determination by the lessor that the use continues to carry out the governmental program. A lease or management contract must be terminable by the contracting public officer or agency if the other contracting patty defaults tinder the contract or if the governmental program is terminated or changed. and must provide for program oversight by the contracting public officer or agency. Money received by the public officer or agency under the lease or management contract that is not needed to pay and not authorized to be used to pay operating costs of the property, or to pay the principal. interest, redemption premiums, and other �J Page 29 expenses when due on debt related to the property other than state bonds, must be: • (1) paid to the commissioner in the same proportion as the state bond financing is to the total public debt financing for the property, excluding debt issued by a unit of government for which it has no financial liability; (2) deposited in the state bond fund: and (3) used to pay or redeem or defense bonds issued to finance the property in accordance with the commissioner's order authorizing their issuance. The money paid to the commissioner is appropriated for this purpose. (c) With the approval of the commissioner, a lease or management contract between a city and a nonprofit corporation under section 471.191, subdivision 1, need not require the lessee to pay rentals sufficient to pay the principal, interest, redemption premiums, and other expenses when due with respect to state bonds issued to acquire and better the facilities. Subd. 3. Sale of property. A public officer or agency shall not sell any state bind financed property unless the public officer or agency determines by official action that the property is no longer usable or needed by the public officer or agency to carry out the governmental program for which it was acquired or constructed, the sale is made as authorized by law, the sale is made for fair market value, and the sale is approved by the commissioner. If any state bonds issued to purchase or better • the state bond financed property that is sold remain outstanding on the date of sale, the net proceeds of sale must be applied as follows: (1) if the state bond financed property was acquired and bettered solely with state bond proceeds, the net proceeds of sale must be paid to the commissioner, deposited in the state bond fund, and used to pay or redeem or defense the outstanding state bonds in accordance with the commissioner's order authorizing their issuance, and the proceeds are appropriated for this purpose; or (2) if the state bond financed property was acquired or bettered partly with state bond proceeds and partly with other money, the net proceeds of sale must be used: fast, to pay to the state the amount of state bond proceeds used to acquire or better the property: second, to pay in full any outstanding public or private debt incurred to acquire or better the property; and third, any excess over the amount needed for those purposes must be divided in proportion to the shares contributed to the acquisition or betterment of the property and paid to the interested public and private entities, other than any private lender already paid in full, and the proceeds are appropriated for this purpose. When all of the net proceeds of the sale have been applied as provided in this subdivision, this section no longer applies to the property. Subd. 3a. Involuntary sale of property. Notwithstanding subdivision 3, this subdivision applies to the sale of state bond financed property by a lender that has provided money to acquire or better the property. Purchase by the lender in a foreclosure sale, acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure, Page 30 or enforcement of a security interest in personal property, by the lender, is not a sale. Following purchase by the lender, the lender shall not operate the property in a manner inconsistent with the governmental program established as provided in subdivision 2, paragraph (b). The lender shall exercise its best efforts to sell the property by the lender. A sale by the lender must be made as authorized by law and must be made for fair market value. Subd. 4. Relation to other laws. This section applies to all state bond financed property unless otherwise provided by law. Subd. 5. Program funding. Recipients of grants from money appropriated from the bond proceeds fund must demonstrate to the commissioner of the agency making the grant that the recipient has the ability and a plan to fiord the program intended for the facility. A private nonprofit organization that leases or manages a facility acquired or bettered with grant money appropriated from the bond proceeds fiord must demonstrate to the commissioner of the agency making the grant that the organization has the ability and a plan to fund the program intended for the facility. History: 1994 c 643 s 36; 1 Sp 1995 c 2 Art 1 s 19 -22; 1996 c 463 s 32 u 0 Page 31 APPENDIX G 0 MINNESOTA STATUTES 16B.335 Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 19934 Supplement, section 16B.335, is amended to read: 16B.335 REVIEW OF PLANS AND PROJECTS. Subdivision 1. CONSTRUCTION AND MAJOR REMODELING. The commissioner, or any other recipient to whom an appropriation is made to acquire or better public lands or buildings or other public improvements of a capital nature, must not prepare final plans and specifications for any construction, major remodeling, or land acquisition in anticipation of which the appropriation was made until the agency that will use the project has presented the program plan and cost estimates for all elements necessary to complete the project to the chair of the senate finance committee and the chair of house ways and means committee and the chairs have made their recommendations, and the chair of the house capital investment committee is notified. "Construction or major remodeling" means construction of a new building or substantial alteration of the exterior dimensions or interior configuration of an existing building. The presentation must note any significant changes in the work that will be done, or in its cost, since the appropriation for the project was enacted or from the predesign submittal. The program plans and estimates must be presented for review at least two weeks before a recommendation is needed. The recommendations are advisory only. Failure or • refusal to make a recommendation is considered a negative recommendation. The chairs of the senate finance committee, and the house ways and means committee must also be notified whenever there is a substantial change in a construction or major remodeling project, or in its cost. (b) Capital Projects exempt from the requirements of this section include construction, renovation, or improvements to darns, highway rest areas, truck stations, storage facilities not consisting primarily of offices or heated work areas, trails, bike oaths, sewer separation projects, water and waste water facilities, campgrounds. roads, bridges, or any other capital project with a construction cost of less than $200,000. Subdivision 2. Other Projects. All other capital projects for which a specific appropriation is made must not proceed until the recipient undertaking the project has notified the chair of the senate Finance committee, the chair of the house capital investment committee, and the chair of the house ways and means committee that the work is ready to begin. Notice is not required for capital projects needed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or funded by an agency's operating budget or by a capital asset preservation and replacement account under section 16A.632, or a higher education capital asset preservation and renewal account under section 135A.046. Section 43. Minnesota Statutes 1993 supplement, section 16B.335, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subdivision 3. Predesign Requirement. A recipient to whom an appropriation is made for a Page 32 • project subject to review under subdivision I or notice under subdivision 2 shall prepare a predesign package and submit it to the commissioner for review and recommendation before proceeding with design activities. The commissioner must complete the review and recommendation within ten working days after receiving it. Failure to review and recommend within the ten days is considered a positive recommendation. The predesign package must be sufficient to define the scope, cost, and schedule of the project and must demonstrate that the project has been analyzed according to appropriate space needs standards. The definition in paragraphs (a) and (b) apply to this section. (a) "Predesign" means the stage in the development of a project during which the purpose, scope, cost, and schedule of the complete project are defined and instructions to design professionals are produced. (b) "Design' means the stage in the development of a project during which schematic, design development, and contract documents are produced. Section 44. %finnesota Statutes 1993 Supplement, section 16B.335, is amended by adding a subdivision to read: Subdivision 4. Energy Conservation. A recipient to whom a direct appropriation is made for a capital improvement project shall ensure that the project complies with the applicable energy • conservation standards contained in law, including sections 2160.19 to 216C.21, and rules adopted thereunder. The recipient may use the energy planning and intervention and energy technologies units of the department of public service to obtain information and technical assistance on energy conservation and alternative energy development relating to the planning and construction of the capital improvement project. Subdivision 5. Information Technology. Agency requests for construction and remodeling funds shall include money for cost -effective information technology investments that would enable an agency to reduce its need for office space, provide more of its services electronically, and decentralize its operations. The information policy office must review and approve the information technology portion of construction and major remodeling program plans before the plans are submitted to the chairs of the senate finance committee and the house of representatives ways and means committee for their recommendations as required by subdivision 1. Subdivision 6. Information Technology Review Precondition. No state agency or department shall propose and the legislature shall not consider building or relocation projects without reviewing implications of utilizing information technology on space utilization. • Page 33 APPENDIX H is MINNESOTA STATUTES 1595 Subd. 10. Capital Investment No state agency may propose or implement a capital investment plan for a state office building unless: (1) the agency has developed a plan for increasing telecommuting by employees who would normally work in the building, or the agency has prepared a statement describing why such a plan is not practicable; and (2) the plan or statement has been reviewed by the council' and approved by the information policy office. 'Government Information Access Council. Page 34 0 GLOSSARY Agency Strategic Plan: A projection of agency facility needs based on trends, policies, and standards that define the need. Architectural/engineering program: A written statement setting forth design objectives, constraints and criteria for a project, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility and expandability, special equipment and systems, and site requirements, if applicable. Building Operating Expenses: Costs related to the operations of the physical building such as maintenance, utilities, security, repair and alteration, and any other costs associated with the building operations. (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2A20, 2A30, 2A90, 2B0, 2D10, 2D20, 2D90, 2J00, 2K00, 2K30, 2K60, 2K70, 2K80, 2K90, 2M00, 2M50, 2500, 2520, 2590.) Changes in State Operating Costs: Serves in the capacity of a facilities note that seeks determination of the project's impact on the agency's operating budget over a six-year period. This requirement is mandated by state statutes (M.S. 16A.105, sec. 5, subd. 5). Both direct and indirect costs should be identified for the current and future biennia including, but not limited to, staffing costs, progratniservice costs, and increased building operation and utility expenses. These costs should reflect the agency budget associated with the request. • Commissioning: Is a basic four -part processing verifying: the review of the project program through design and construction, the interaction and training process for facility personnel, the correction of project deficiencies, and the recordation of warranties and guarantees. Compensation (Program & Building Operations): Refers to all the direct and indirect program and building operations staffing costs associated with this request. (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 1A0 -1E0.) Construction: The total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the project designed or specified by the architect. It does not include the compensation of the architect and the architect's consultants, the cost of land, rights -of -way, financing, or other costs which remain the responsibility of the owner. Construction Contingency: An amount of money set aside for unforeseen conditions in a construction project. The amount can vary from 2% to 3% in new construction to 5% to 10 9 /6 in projects of a remodeling nature based on project size and complexity. Differences in localized costs, design contingencies, or other items should be factored into the general construction cost. Construction ;Management: Management services provided to an owner of a project during the design and/or construction stage by a person or entity possessing requisite training experience. These services may include advice on the time and cost consequences of design and construction decisions, scheduling, cost control, coordination of contract negotiations and awards, timely purchasing of • Page 35 critical materials and long -lead items, and coordination of construction activities. i Contract A The duties and responsibilities of the architect and owners representative (state) during the construction stage. Contract Documents: The agreement between the owner and contractor, conditions of the contract (general, supplementary, and others), drawings, specifications, and addenda issued prior to execution of the contract, other documents listed in the agreement and modifications issued after execution of the contract. Department of Finance Multiplier: Referenced in the most current Department of Finance Biennial Capital Budget Instructions. Demolition/Decommissioning: Cost for razing a facility or removing from service permanently. Hazardous material abatement associated with this action shall be itemized separately under the Hazardous Material Abatement category but included in the total cost of the project budget. Design: The stage in the development of a project during which schematic, design development, and contract documents are produced. Design Development: The stage of the architect's services in which the architect prepares from the approved schematic design studies the design development documents, for submission to the owner for the owner's approval. Design Fees: These design services include normal architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical engineering services that cover the schematic, design development, contract documents, bidding, and construction administration stages of a construction project. Reimbursable items, additional services and specialty consultants should be added. F.T.E. Personnel: The number of full time equivalent employees/students associated with this request. Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF &E): Items not normally considered permanently attached to the structure but are considered a bondable cost and not part of the construction costs. Office systems furniture is an example. Hazardous Material Abatement: Any costs associated with the encapsulation and/or abatement of hazardous materials in structures associated with the construction project. Inflation: The rate that cost of construction increases over the duration of the project calculated to the mid point of construction. Infrastructure/Roads/Utilities: Costs for the construction or enhancements to infrastructure/roads/ grounds/utilities beyond the site perimeter. Page 36 Life-cVcle costing: Life -cycle costing is a method of calculating the total cost of ownership over the life span of the asset. Initial cost and all subseouent expected costs of significance are included in the calculations as well as disposal value and any other quantifiable benefits to be derived Nonstate -Owned Lease Expenses: All the costs related to a commercially leased facility. This would include the lease (rental) cost, tenant (leasehold) improvements. security, and any other costs associated with an agency leasing a commercial facility. lThis cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2A00. 2A20. 2A30, 2A40, 2BO.) Needs analysis: Includes estimates of amount and type of space needed, survey of existing space, investigating ways to utilize existing space as an alternative to new construction, investigating other alternatives to new construction, and identifying the selection criteria for the preferred alternative. Occupancy: The purpose for which a building, or part thereof, is used or intended to be used lUniform Building Code). One Percent for Art: An allocation of one percent of the construction costs only (MS 16B.35). Allocations may be exempted or reduced depending on the project. Operational program: The operational function of a facility described in terms of services provided, products delivered, activities performed resources needed, and results expected. Other (specify): Other cost related to the project not accounted for in the previous categories. Other Program Related Expenses (other than compensation costs): (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2CO, 2DOO, 2D30 -2D90. 2EO, 2FO, 2GO, 2HO, 2JO, 2KOO, 2K30, 2K60, 2K70, 2K80, 2LO, 2M0. 2NQ 2P0, 2Q0, 2R0, 250, 4A0, 4B0, 4CQ 5DO, 6A0, 6BO, 6CO, 6DO.) Predesign: The stage in the development of a project during which the purpose, scope, cost, and schedule of the complete project are defined and instructions to design professionais are produced. Predesign Fees: The fees consumed in the preparation of the predesign document that can range from';,% to 014% of a construction amount depending on the scale and complexiry of the project. Project Management: Is the process of planning, scheduling, and controlling the critical aspects of the Owner's program. The quality, budget. and deadlines are protected through the use of agency staff (Owner Administration) and/or outsourcing (Construction Management). Property Acquisition: The use of funds to acquire land, easements, options, or land with buildings or other improvements. • Page 37 Remodeling (Adaption)(Alterations): Expenditures required to adapt the physical plant as required to the evolving needs of the institution and to changing standards. Renewal: Expenditures required to keep the physical plant in reliable operating condition for its present use.(SCUP) Revenue Offsets: New or additional revenues that are a direct result of the project's construction/ renovation. (This revenue information includes but is not limited to user fees and increased gate receipts.) Schematic Design: Drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of project components. Security Equipment: Specialty equipment usually supplied by a separate contract from those of construction or FF &E. Site and Building Preparation: Work performed within the perimeter of the land parcel but beyond five feet from the existing structure or new construction that would include infrastructure/ roads/and utilities. State -Owned Lease Expenses: The rents paid for leases of spaces in buildings under the custodial control of the Department of Administration. Rates for leasing space in these buildings are set by the Department of Administration, Plant Management Division and approved by the Department of Finance. (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2A10.) State Staff Project Management: Costs an agency charges to a construction project to cover internal personnel administrative management. Telecommunications (voice & data): Specialty equipment supplied by a separate contract from those of construction or FF &E. NOTES "Owner" refers to the State of Minnesota. Some deficiencies are adapted from the American Institute of Architects, the Society of State College and University Planning. Page 38 RECEIVED JUN 9 2000 • E 0 A Petition City of HutchftM This is a petition for any residents living on the section of Lewis Avenue, starting from Lake Street and going to Dale Street, requesting the direction be made into a one -way street. 2, �- 1. "Irrsap".0r. LIG"N% - � 7v_ 4. 7" $. Address 900 L EWIS kEWC sl;z5 L2 V' 6.a 7. I J `� 1 tip/ 8. 9. 10.-- G U� 1 7 0- / -7 Leak5 9-4 13. r J r 14./ 15., �u kc� G� q Uo Leal L A ve 1 J N 1b L.O. -1) A-H"t Ce,+Ntr 17. 19. c. I1 �l�rL d i ✓v 20.fcotib cam' 21. 22. 23 9 e Letidi3 +� 1 08 Aw - at, . (61�& &L4- a We�t) 24. RESOLUTION NO. 11496 RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO.61PROJECT NOS. 0049100-12!00- 13M0 -17 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of Project No. 00-09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00-12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman's 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Projed No. 00-13 8th Avenue SW in Hunter's Ridge by construction of biturninous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00-17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment is hereby accepted with the following revisions: a) Griffin Ave NE Is hereby rejected due to high cost and will be considered next year; b) Michael Court NW, North of North High • Dr to KDUZ - construction is reduced to sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against lt. A copy of the revised assessment is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of _percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to cadtfication of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax fists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000. • Mayor City Administrator 0 0 9 COMPILED BY: J RODFRERG ASSESSMENT ROIL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. OPROJECT NO. OP09 GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BIHIMINOUS SDRFAC G AND APPURTENANCES f - STREET COST PER FROM FOOT COMPUTED BY: J RODEBFRG $ - WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH CELEC BY: P. VANDER VEEN 04/04/2000 1ST HEARING NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 05/23/2000 2ND HEARING INTEREST RATE 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 6.12 -2000 ACCOUNT NO. CITY PLD NO. NMIB & ADDRESS Of PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION FRONT FEET STREET WATER SERVICE TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 1 31- 117 -29 -07-0060 Roger & Peggy DeMeyer 307 Griffin Ave NE 0 307 Griffin Ave NE Lot 3, Block 3 13.100.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nybe 's 2nd Addition 75 f 2 31- 117 -29 -07 -0070 Jason & Niccole Schwartz 317 Griffin Ave NE 0 317 Griffin Ave NE Fly 76.97' of Lot 5, 23.102.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyber 's 4th Addition 90 f - S - f - 3 31.11729 -07 -0190 Troy Boettcher & Lisa Berge 205 Griffin Ave NE 0 205 Griffin Avc NE Lot 12, And. Plat of Lot 10, Audi Plat S 1/2 23.232.0140 Hutchinson MN 55350 Secion 30 & N 1/2 Section 31- 117.29 66 f S - f - 4 31- 117 -29 -07 -0200 Brian & Kathlmn Zimmerman 245 Griffin Ave NE 0 245 Griffin Ave NE Lt 5, Block 2, 23.100.0070 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyberg's 2nd Addition 66 S - f - f - 5 31 -117 - 29-07 -0330 Richard & Jane Femholz 105 Griffin Ave NE 0 105 Gruen Ave NE Lot 5, 2}p99.0030 Hutchinson MN 35350 Nyberg's 1st Addition 66 $ - f - f - 6 31- 117 -29 -07 -0340 Cameron & Jill Hempel 131 Griffin Ave NE 0 131 Griffin Ave NE Lot 6, 21099.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 N r 's In Addition 66 S - f - f - 7 31- 117 -29 -07-0410 Jeffrey & Teresa Schmidt 805 Main St N 0 805 Blain St N Lot 1, And. Plat of Lot 10, And. Plat S 1/2 23.232.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31- 117 -29 61.8 f - f 8 31- 1172907 -0550 jainim & Teresa Alders 25 Griffin Ave NE 1 25 Griffin Ave NE Lot 8, And. Plat of Lot 10, Aud. Plat S 1/2 21232.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31 -117 -29 66 f - f 9 31. 117 - 29-07 -0560 Emil & Virginia Vozenilek 745 Maio St N 0 745 Main St N Lot 1, Block 1, 23.088.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - $ - $ - 10 31 -117- 29-07-0650 Russell & Doris Nelson 746 Oak St NE 0 746 Oak St NE Lot 10, Block 1, 13.088.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 CoB eAddition 66 f - f - f - 0 0 0 COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00-09 GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANCES $ STREET COST PER FRONT FOOT COMPUTED BY: J ROD ®ERG f - WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH CHECKED BYe P. VANDER VEEN 04/04/2000 1ST HEARING NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 05/23/2000 2ND HEARING INTEREST RATE- 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 6.12 -2000 ACCO NO. CITY PID NO. NAME Y ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OwNPR LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVLSTON FRONT FEET STREET WATER SERVICE TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY Pm NO. 11 31.11729 -07 -0820 Craig & Tammy Lauer 106 Griffin Ave NE 0 106 Griffin Ave NE Lot 1, Block 4, 23.088.0270 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 S - f - S - 12 31- 117 - 129 -07 -0910 Ursula K. Smith 744 Elm St NE 0 744 Elm St NE Lor 10, Block 4, 23.088.0360 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - f - S - 13 31- 117 -29- 07-0920 Ryan T. Huls 200 Griffin Ave NE 0 200 Griffin Ave NE Lot 1, Block 5, 23.088.0370 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - f 14 31- 11729 -07 -1010 Robert Arthur Jr. & Brenda Arthur 246 Griffin Ave NE 0 246 Griffin Ave NE N64' of Lot 10, Block 5, 23.088.0460 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 64 f - S - f - 15 31- 117 -29-07 -1190 Anna M. Paul 755 Ash St NE 0 755 Ash St NE Lot 1, Block 8, 23.088.0640 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - f - S - 16 31- 117 -29 -07 -1280 Stanley & Lorraine Ronnei 756 Maple St NE 0 756 Maple St NE Lot 10, Block 8, 23.088.0730 Hutchinson MN 55350 1 College Addition 66 S - f - f - TOTAL • PROJECT NO. 00-09 10818 S - 1 $ - COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00-12 HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICHIGAN ST NE TO PAIR'S RD NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES, BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE AND APPIIRTFNANCFS $ 661.08 STREET COST PER PARCEUSOUTH PARCELS COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG $ 403.99 STREET COST PER UNIT /NORTH PARCELS CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN S 850.32 UTILITIES COST PER PARCEL./SOUTH PARCELS NUMBEROFYFARS: 10 04/04/1000 1STHEARI14G INTEREST RATE 05/23/2000 2ND HEARING 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 0611712000 ACCOUNT NO, CITY PID NO. NAME 8 ADDRESS Of PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT OR PARCEL STRITr UTILITIES TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMEN T COUNTY PtD NO. 17 32- 117 -29- 14-0490 Kermeth Santelman Trust 106 Pauls Rd NE 106 Pains Rd NE Lot 3, Block 1, 23251.0030 Hutchinson MN 55350 Santelman's Second Addition 1 $ 661.08 $ 661.08 18 32. 117.29- 14-0500 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 504 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Sieve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot I, Block 1, 21253.0010 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition I S 661.08 $ 850.32 S 1,511.40 19 32- 117 -29- 14-0510 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 512 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 2, Block 1, 23.253.0020 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 S 650.32 $ 1,511.40 20 32. 117 -29- 14-0520 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 520 Hilltop Dr NE I c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 3, Block 1, 23.253.0030 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition I IS 661.08 S 850.32 $ 1,511.40 21 32- 117 -29- 14-0530 Momin side Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 530 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 4, Block 1, 23.253.0040 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Thud Addition 1 $ 661.08 $ 850.32 S 1,511.40 22 32- 117 -29- 14-0540 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 540 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 5, Block 1, 23.253.0050 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Thud Addition 1 S 661.08 $ - 850.32 $ 1,511.40 23 32- 117 -29- 14-0550 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 550 Hilltop Dr NE 1 - C/O Steve Klabunde P O Box U Lot 6, Block 1, 23.253.0060 Redwood Fags MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 $ 850.32 S 1,511.40 21 32- 117 -29 -140560 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 560 Hilltop Dr NE 1 - c/o Steve Klabtmde P O Box 13 Lot 7, Block 1, 23.253.0070 Redwood Fags MN 56283 Santelman's Thud Addition 1 S 661.08 S 850.32 S 1511.40 • • COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. M39 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00.12 HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICILIGAN ST NE TO PAUL'S RD NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES, BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE AND APPURTENANCES S 661.08 STREET COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PARCELS COMPUTED BY: JRODEBERG S 403.99 STREET COST PER UNITMORTH PARCELS CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN S 850.32 U [UT1IS COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PARCELS NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 04 /04/2000 1ST HEARING tN1YRFST KATE: 05/23/2000 2ND HEARING - 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 08/17/2000 ACCOUNT NO. CRY Pm NO. NAME k ADDRFSS OF PROPERTY OW14R LEG AL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT Olt PARCEL. I SI7PPT UIRLIDB TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 25 32- 117 -29. 14-0570 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 570 Hdkop Dr NE 1 c/o Stew Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 8, Block 1, 23.253.0080 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Samelmm's Third Addition 1 $ 661.08 $ 850.32 S 1,511.40 26 32 -117- 2914-0580 , Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 580 Hilho Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 9, Block 1, 23.253.0090 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelmm's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 $ 850.32 S 1,511.40 27 32- 117-29- 14-0590 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 590 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 10, Block 1, 23.253.0100 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Samelman's Third Addition 1 $ 661.08 $ 85032 $ 1,511.40 28 32- 117 -29- 144600 Mornin ide Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 600 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde - P O Box 13 Lot 11, Block 1, 23.253.0110 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Smulmm's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 $ 850.31 S 1,51140 29 32- 117 -29- 14-0610 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 505 Hilltop Dr NE 0 _ c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 1, Block 2, 23.253.0120 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 3 $ 1,211.97 S - S 1,211.97 30 32- 117 -29- 14-0620 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 515 Hilltop Dr NE 0 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 2, Block 2, 23.253.0130 Redwood Fags MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 3 S 1,211.97 S - S 1,211.97 31 32- 117 -29- 14-0830 Margaret Shaffer 111 Mornside Dr NE 0 111 Morningside Dr NE Unit Ill be .167% Common Area 23.255.0040 Hu¢hintan MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 S 403.99 $ - S 403.99 32 32- 117 -29- 14-0840 Delbert k Janice Klabunde 113 Morningside Dr NE 0 113 Morningside Dr NE Unit 113 be .166% Common Area 23.255.0050 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Mormapide Estate 1 S 403.99 S - $ 403.99 33 32- 117 -29- 14-0850 Sandra Bonniwell 1115 Morningside Dr NE 0 115 Morningside Dr NE jUnu 115 bt .167% Common Arm 23.255.0060 lHutchimon MN 55350 lCondomi No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 $ 403.99 S - S 403.99 0 COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5079 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00.12 HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICHIGAN ST NE TO PAUL'S RD NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES, BITUMINOUS V EAR COURSE AN D APPURTENANCES S 661.08 STREET COST PER PAR PARCELS COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG $ 403.99 STREET COST PER UNIT/NORTH PARCELS CHECKED BY: P. V ANDER VEIN $ 850.32 UTTIIHES COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PAR c NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 04/04/2000 IST HEARING INTEREST RATE 05/23/2000 2ND HEARING 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 08172/2000 ACCOLU NO. cnT PID NO. NAME & ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT OR PARCEL STREET UTILITIES TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PH) NO. 34 32- 117 -29 -14 -1010 JiU Marie Forbes 104 Morningside Dr NE 0 104 Morningside Dr NE Unit 104, 23.255.0220 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate l S 403.99 S - f 403.99 35 32- 117 -29- 14-1020 Roben & Charlotte Hanson 106 Morningside Dr NE 0 106 Morningside Dr NE Unit 106, 23.255.0230 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Mornin ide Estate 1 f 403.99 S - f 403.99 36 32- 117 -29-14 -1030 Lori Waldera-Tarafa 108 Morningside Dr NE 0 108 Morningside Dr NE Unit 108 & .167% Common Am, 23.255.0240 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 f 403.99 f - f 403.99 37 32- 117 -29 -14 -1070 Thu & Guynh Nguyen 515 Hilltop Dr NE 0 525 Hillto Dr NE Unit 525 &. 167% Common Area, 23.255.0280 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Esuw 1 $ 403.99 f - S 403.99 38 32- 117 -29 -14 -1080 Ardis & Leola Hoversten 527 Whop Dr NE 0 527 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 527 & ,167% Common Area, 23.255.0290 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 S 403.99 $ - f 403.99 39 32- 117.29 -14 -1090 Cheryl Lobar 529 Hilhop Dr NE 0 - 529 Hilko Dr NE Unit 529 &,167% Common Area, 23.255.0300 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 S 403.99 S - f 403.99 40 32- 117 -29- 14-1100 Alm Cook 535 Hilltop Dr NE 0 535 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 535 &.167% Common Area 23.255.0310 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No, 6, Morningside Esnre 1 f 403.99 f - S 403.99 41 32 -117 -29-14 -1110 Verdella Demen a 537 Hilltop Dr NE 0 537 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 537 &.167% Common Area, 23.255.0320 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Emote 1 S 403.99 $ - f 403.99 42 32- 117.29- 14-1120 Linda Rick 539 Hilltop Dr NE 0 539 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 539 &.167% Common Area, 23.255.0330 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Mornin side Emote 1 f 403.99 S - S 403.99 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00.12 30 f 15,204.78 S 9,364.52 $ 24,558.30 0 0 9 COMPILED BY: ) RODEBPRG ASSESSMENT' ROLL NO. 5039 LE `r1NG NO.6/PROJECT NO. 00-13 LTH AVENUE SW IN HUNTER'S RIDGE BY CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE k APPURTENANCES S 1,137.39 STREET COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN 04/0412000 1ST HEARING NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 03/23/2000 IND HEARING INTEREST RATE- 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 611212000 ACCOUNT NO. CIIY PID NO. NAlB Y ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWN" LEGAL DCSCRIPIION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION EACH STREET CREL)rr TOTAL ACII M ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 43 02- 11630 - 16-0050 Mark & Ruth Senn 1447 8th Ave SW 1447 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 1, 23.420.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,137.39 S - f 1,137.39 44 02116- 30160060 Joe[ & Karen Dettman 1441 8th Ave SW 1441 8th Ave SW Lot 2, Block 1, 23420.0020 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 $ - S 1,13739 45 02- 11630- 16-0'r0 Bruce Elhg 1435 8th Ave SW 1435 81h Ave SW Lot 3, Block 1, _ 23.420.0030 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride 1 f 1,137.39 f S 1,137.39 46 02- 1163016-0080 Kevin Compton 1431 8th Ave SW 18482 202nd Cir Lot 4, Black 1, 23.420.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ri e 1 f 1,137.39 f - $ 1,13739 47 02- 11630.160090 David & Pamela Johnston 1427 81h Ave SW 1427 8th Ave SW Lot 5, Block 1, 23.420.0050 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 f - S 1,137.39 48 02- 11630-16-0100 Todd & Marie Petsinger 1423 8th Ave SW • 1423 8th Ave SW Lot 6, Block 1, 23.420.0060 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,13739 S - S 1,137.39 49 02.11630160110 Kevin & Darla Keith 1417 8th Ave SW 1417 8th Ave SW Lot 7, Block 1, 23.420.0070 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 f - f 1,137.39 50 02- 11630160120 Darwin & Lorine Maus 1448 8th Ave SW 1448 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 2, 23.420.0080 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ri e 1 f 1,137.39 f - f 1,137.39 51 02- 11630.1601.:0 Ronald & Susan McKinnon 1444 8th Ave SW 1444 8th Ave SW Lot 2. Block 2, 23.420.0090 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,137.391 f f 1,137.39 52 02- 11630.16-0140 Janet Krumrey 850 Hunters St SW 850 Hunters St SW Lot 3, Block 2, 23.420.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 IS f 1,137.39 0 0 COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LEMNG NO. 6/PROJECT NO. DD-13 STH AVENUE SW IN HUNTER'S RIDGE BY CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE & APPURTENANCES $ 1,137.39 STREET COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN 04/04/2000 1ST HEARING NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 05/23/2000 1ND HEARING INTEREST RATE 05/23/2000 ADOPTED REVISED 8!77!7000 A NO. CRY PID NO. NAME &ADDRESS OF PROMMTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRUMON ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION EACH STREET CItPDrr TOTAL ACHVR ASSESSMENT COUNTY Pm NO. 53 02.11630160150 Karen Cr ago 1404 8th Ave SW 1404 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 3, 23.420,0110 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride 1 S 1,137.39 f - S 1,137.39 54 02- 11630 - 160166 Mark & Robin Liun ren 1408 8th Ave SW 1408 8th Ave SW Lot 2, Block 3, 21420.0120 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge I S 1,137.39 f - f 1,137.39 55 02. 11630160170 Loren & Deborah Ra ow 1414 8th Ave SW 1414 8th Ave SW Lot 3, Block 3, 23.420.0130 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride 1 S 1,137.39 f - f 1,137.39 56 02- 1163016-0180 Dennis & Kuen Ingle 1418 8th Ave SW 1418 8th Ave SW Lot 4, Block 3, 23.420.0140 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 f - f 1,137.39 57 02- 1163016-0190 Dean & Kimberly Brehmer Lot 5, Black 3, 1424 8th Ave SW 1424 8th Ave SW 23.420.0150 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's R4, 1 S 1,13739 f - S 1,13739 58 02- 11630160200 Richard Nay & Sherry Mischel-Nagy Lot 6, Block 3, 1430 8th Ave SW 1430 8th Ave SW 23,420.0160 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride 1 f 1,137.39 f - $ 1,137.39 59 02 -11 &30160210 jKathy Hintze Lot 7, Block 3, 855 Hunters St SW 855 Hunters St SW 23.420.0170 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,137.39 f - $ 1,137.39 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 0013 1 7 f 19,335.63 f - f 19,335.63 9 0 0 COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL. N0. 5039 IETTMG NO. 6/PROJECT NO. 00.17 MICHAEL COURT NV: NORTH OF NORTH HIGH DR TO KDUZ BY CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER & SERVICES $ . STREET COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG $ - W ATIRMAIN COST PER EACH CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN $ 13,485.98 SANITARY SEVER COST PER EACH NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 04/04/2000 1ST HEARING 2ND HEARING 05/23/2000 INTEREST RATE 05/23/2000 - ADOPTED REVISED 06172/2000 ACCOUNT NO. CM Pm NO. NAME & ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIYMN EACH SIREEr WATERMU4 SANITARY SEWER TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 60 30117 -29- 14-0010 Golden Oaks Investment Co. 45 North High Dr NW C/o Eaem 610 Virginia Shores Cir Lot 1, Block 1, 23.398.0010 Excelsior MN 55331 Boyle's Addition 1 $ - S - S 13,485.98 f 13,485.98 61 34117.29- 14-0020 Chet & Associates 110 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 2, Block 1, 23.398.17020 MinonK WI 54859 -9463 Boyle's Addition 1 $ - f - f 13,485.98 S 13,485.98 62 30117.29.14 -0030 Chet & Associates 120 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 3, Block 1, 23.398.0030 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Boyle's Addition 1 S - $ - $ 13,485.98 $ 13,485.98 63 30117- 29- 14-DAO Chu & Associates 125 Michael Ca NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 4, Block 1, 23398.0040 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Boyle's Addition 1 $ - $ - f 13,485.98 S 13,485.98 64 30-117 -29- 14-0050 Chet & Associates 115 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 5, Block 1, 23.398.0050 Minong WI 54859.9463 Boyle's Addition 1 S - $ - $ 13,485.98 $ 13,485.98 65 30-117 -29-14 -0060 Chet & Associates 105 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 6, Block 1, 23. 398.0060 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Boyle's Addition 1 $ - $ - $ 13,485.98 S 13,485.98 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00-17 6 SO.00 50.00 $80,915.88 $80,915.88 PROJECT NO. 00-12 $24,558.30 PROJECT NO. 00.13 $19,335.63 ' PROJECT NO. 0017 $80,915.88 TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROLL 5039 f 124,809.81 Proposed Market As we discussed at our meeting, the defined marketplace for different levels of the organization will change. The purpose of this list is to propose those jurisdictions which should play a role in further discussions: Jurisdiction Based on... Classifications... McLeod County Geography All Meeker County Geography All Carver County Geography All Sibley County Geography All Renville County Geography All Wright County Geography All Glencoe Geography Non- exempt Litchfield Geography Non- exempt Norwood Young America Geography Non - exempt Cokato Geography Non - exempt Olivia Geography Non- exempt Chaska Population All Chanhassen Population All Shakopee Population Prof/Managerial Prior Lake Population Prof/Managerial Farmington East Bethel Population Population Prof/Managerial PF004onageriel FTT R#X x Popntatipn rrof/Mtrpagex l Champlin Population Prof/Managerial Owatonna Population Prof/Managerial Albert Lea Population Prof/Managerial St. Cloud Population Prof/Managerial Mankato Population Prof/Managerial Hastings Population Prof/Managerial Savage Population Prof/Managerial Northfield Population Prof/Managerial From our discussions, we understand that the list of jurisdictions to comprise the City's chosen market place may have longevity; that is, the City will use this list again in the future. I,' A, HHPOP Homebuyer Funds Requested # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 Loan # XXXX X_UX 8 700 87 XXXX XXXX 8702_ 8703 8704 8705 8 Closing CAS A_ PROGRAMS ECHO Total Fu nding _ $1,040 $86,514 $105,055 $114,500 $ $1 $11 5,625 $_11_3,425 $1 _ $1 $11 Com- ments DON E_ site _ Island View Heights Island Vie H Rolling Me Island View H I sland Vi ew Heights Isla V iew He ights Roll M eadows Rolling Meadow Rolling Meadows Rolling Meadows Rolling Meadows R ollin g_ M _ Date 8/19/99 9130/9 1/28/00 1/31/00 _21 2/1/00 3/16/0 3/30/00 3/31/00 3/31/00 4/21/00 D TED D iscount HRA GA_P MC HAF /ECL_ $9 _ $18,000 _ $18, 000 $18,000 _ $18,0 $1,040 $ 2,000 $2,000 _ $2,000 _$2 $2,000 $2,0 __ $2,000 _ DONE DONE DONE _ D DONE _D O N N E_ DO DONE DO DO 12 8707 4/28/00 $20,000 $1,040 $21,040 ,DON 13 14 8708 '-- 8709 Rolling Meadows --- -- - --- - -- Rol M eadows 4128/ $93,065 $18,000 $2,000 $2,000 _ _ $113,065_ _ $ 115,625 DON _ DONE -_.__. 5/ 24/00 $113,62 15 8710 Is lan d Vie H eights 5 /31/00 $9 $ $ 2,000 _ $115,445 _ DONE 1 6 8711 Island View Heights 6 /19/00 $ $ 20,00 0 $2,000 $10,00_0 $ 102,599 R_e 17 18 8712 8713 Island View Heights Rolling Meadows Island Vi ew Heights Rolling Mead Rol Mea dows Island Vi ew Heights 6/23/00 $109,000 $ $7,750 $11 6,750 _ Re 6 /30/0 0 $18,000 $121,531 _ 19 20 21 22 87 6 6/30/00 6/3 7/3 $112,D00 $1 _ __ $18,000 _ __$2,000 $2,0 $2,0 0_0 $_ _ $114,00 $109,12 $_1 17,600 $ 115,225 A ppr. Appr. Appr. bb 8 715 87 23 871 Rolling Meadows 8/1100 $ 85,345 $20 ,000 $2,000 $10,000 $117,345 24 25 26 27 8718 Island View Heights Rolling Meadows Rolling Meadows Island View Heights CASA 1999 Funds 8/15/00 $113,625 $ 2,00 0 $ 115,625 _App_r XXXX 8719 M 8/16/00 $115,593 $2,000 $115,593 $1 15, 6 25 $705,525 $2,830,202 Res. S ept. $113,625 _ $211,750 10/12/00 $103,525 $2,558,772 $2, Totals $2,080 $37,600 $0 $20,000 Revised 6/1212000 G: /HRA/1999 SCDP /HHPOP Funding Log (nameless) OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT A 12 -JUN -2000 (15:54) page 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GENERAL FUND BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS RIBBONS $862.07 • < *> $862.07* WATER /SEWER FUND BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS CABLE $2,437.46 < *> $2,437.46* $3,299.53* • • i ,OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 1 --- ------- 1990 - - - - -- __-- - - - -__ _ - - -__ ___- _---------- TIDS FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA AGENT FEES - - - -__ __ $461.76 GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES • < > $461.76* $15.59 CAP.IMPRO.FUND BAILEY NURSERIES TREES /SHRUBS $368.79 CROW RIVER GLASS < *> $368.79* HANDBOOK CMaIdYY;l \ \Rel: \ ;7 ENERGY LOAN FD R:�17 • BRANDON TIRE CO TIRES $761.97 GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES CAMERA SHOP DEVELOPE & PRINT $29.41 $15.59 COAST TO COAST SUPPLIES $16.29 CROW RIVER GLASS WINDSHIELD $436.59 HANDBOOK FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT PARTS, LABOR $916.03 $10.00 FAYE & DAVE'S UPHOLSTERY UPHOLSTER BUCKET SEAT $203.90 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS $71.83 FLOWERS GARD SPECIALISTS GARDSERT $52.62 $45.00 HARPEL BROS.INC PUMP KIT $144.04 HART'S AUTO SUPPLY FRONT PADS, CLIPS $95.14 SR CENTER BLDG SUPV HUTCH AUTO SALVAGE LEAF SPRING $63.90 $11.00 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE CREDIT RETURN $2,098.63 INTERSTATE BATTERIES BATTERIES $644.91 SLANT FILE JERRYS TRANSMISSION PARTS, LABOR -1996 MACK CL713 $2,178.18 $1,006.43 L & P SUPPLY CO REPAIR TIRE $954.03 LTP ENTERPRISES 1" CHECK VALVES $19.70 CREDIT MACQUEEN EQUIP INC HANDLE WELDMENT $35.11 $51.37 NO STATES SUPPLY INC SHOP PARTS $33.09 PENSKE AUTO CENTER OIL CHANGE $86.14 REFUND- CANCEL DEFENSIVE DRIVE PLOWMANS PARTS $158.87 $190.49 RUNNING'S SUPPLY JACK $79.65 SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GROUP PIPE MOUNT $178.33 GLOVE HOLDER, PHONE CASE SNAP ON TOOLS CORP AIR RATCHET $106.50 $360.00 ST.JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC PARTS $6.71 SUPERIOR FORD INC 2000 FORD EXPEDTION $27,393.00 REIMB- HOLSTER TERMINAL SUPPLY CO SHOP PARTS $262.49 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $12.54 $37,041.80* LANG &, RANDY A -1 BIKE SHOP ACTION ACCENTS AG SYSTEMS ALLIED MECH.SYSTEMS AMCON BLOCK AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC ANDERSON, JANET ANOKA COUNTY COURT ADMINIS ARNOLD & MCDOWELL B & R GROWERS SAUCKHAM, MELISSA BAUERLY BROS INC. BERNICKS PEPSI COLA BLUHM, MARGIE BRANDON TIRE CO CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY CARR FLOWERS CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY CENTURY LABS CITY OF HUTCHINSON COAST TO COAST COBORN ENTERPRISES INC. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP CRIPPS, CLAIR CROW RIVER PRESS INC CROW RIVER VET CLINIC DAKOTA GOURMET DON HUME DONALD SITZ CUSTOM FARMING DUENOW, RUSSELL ELECTRO WATCHMAN ERLANDSON, DAVID STORE FRONT WORK $2,128.00 $2,128.00* BIKE REPAIRS $68.65 GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES $879.25 SPRAYER PARTS $15.59 LABOR, MATERIALS $240.70 GARDENWALL UNIT ROCKFACE GRY $2,692.62 HANDBOOK $80.62 REFUND - OVERPAYMENT -SWIM PASS $10.00 TRAT BAIL MONEY - ACKERMANN $220.00 MAY COMPENSATION $7,250.00 FLOWERS $65.10 REFUND SWIM LESSONS $45.00 REROD - BASEBALL DOUGOUTS $54.34 POP PURCHASE $525.62 SR CENTER BLDG SUPV $50.00 OFF VEHICLE REPAIR $11.00 COATED BOND PAPER $60.03 BLOOMING PLANT- TREVOR JOHNSON $25.51 SLANT FILE $108.15 HARDWOOD MULCH $1,006.43 WEED KILLER $296.25 MAY & JUNE H.A.T.S. CONTRIB $15,297.76 CREDIT $4,029.18 COFFEE, TAPE $51.37 FREIGHT CHARGES - ATHLETIC GOODS $312.00 COIL CLEAN, PAIL PUMP $186.68 REFUND- CANCEL DEFENSIVE DRIVE $8.00 BUSINESS CARDS $190.49 MAY SERVICE $211.40 DG GIANTS $135.00 GLOVE HOLDER, PHONE CASE $345.00 SER AIRPORT MOWING $360.00 LEAD INSTRUCTOR -6 CLASSES $600.00 PLASTIC PIPE & CONNECTORS $112.69 REIMB- HOLSTER $112.20 I� � OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 2 GENERAL FUND FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN FORCIER, ANDREW G & K SERVICES GALL'S INC GEHLEN, JEANNINE GLAESER, CHERYL GRANIT -BRONZ GRUFRUFF DESIGN GRUHLKE, BRAD GULF STATE DISTRBUTORS HAGEN, RUTH HAGER JEWELRY HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP HCVN -TV HEMMAH, KATHY HENSEN, MARK HILARY, KRISTIN HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON HOESCHENS, DUANE HUTCH CONVENTION & HUTCH COOP CENEX HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY HUTCH FIRE DEPT GENERAL ACCT HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER HUTCH SPORT SHOP HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE HUTCHINSON LEADER HUTCHINSON TEL CO HUTCHINSON UTILITIES HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT JACKSON & GIBBENS JEFF'S ELECTRIC JOES SPORT SHOP JOHNSON, LISA JUREK, SUE KIESER, SUE KLOSS, TOM KREFT, HOLLY L & P SUPPLY CO LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY LEEWES DISTRIBUTING INC M & N INTERNATIONAL MANKATO MOBILE RADIO MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA MCLEOD COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER MCLEOD SOCIAL SERVICES MERRILL, KENNETH B. METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY MID -MN HOT MIX INC MIKESH, MARCELL MINI BIFF MINN BLUE DIGITAL -A MINNCOMM PAGING MITCHELL, WILLIAM MN ELEVATOR INC. MN REC & PARK ASSC MN SPORTS FEDERATION MODERN MAZDA MORE 4 NO STATES SUPPLY INC NORTH STAR CHAPTER ICBO NORTHERN HYDRAULICS OFFICEMAX OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO. OLSONS LOCKSMITH PALACIOS, JOSE PARTIES PLUS PASTOR DICK GRUBER PIONEER PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA INC QUANTUM LABS R & T SPECIALTY MEMBERSHIP DUES $10.00 REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS $49.97 UNIFORMS $1,082.45 UNIFORMS ACCESSORIES $969.57 REFUND- CANCELLED GOLF LESSONS $33.00 COMPUTER CLASS $270.00 POLISHED SEAT $346.13 BOWLING T- SHIRTS $235.25 REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS $60.00 HOLSTER, SHIRTS, POUCH $84.60 REFUND- CANCELLED SHELTER $25.00 PLATES $125.00 POOL CHEMICALS $1,311.47 FRANCHISE PYMT $7,195.34 REIMB - BRIDGE CLUB PRIZES $5.67 REIMB - MILEAGE $11.38 LEAD INSTRUCTOR -4 CLASSES $475.00 POWER DOLLY $533.80 LEAD INST -12 CLASSES, ADMIN $1,950.00 APRIL LODGING TAX $4,273.91 CHEMICALS $203.45 EXTING RECHARGE $78.28 TUITION REIMB -FIRE SCHOOL $1,100.00 PHYSICAL, TESTING $434.00 SHOES $271.98 CPR ANNIE RENTAL $1,376.44 LEGAL NOTICES $1,925.07 JUNE SERVICE $6,674.60 MAY UTILITY $5,706.52 LAMP $13.33 CREDIT RETURNS $4,042.60 PATROL JACKET $58.95 75W INCDESANT BULBS $48.00 SCREENED T- SHIRTS $522.00 REFUND - CANCELLED SWIMMING $22.00 LEAD INSTRUCTOR, FR TESTER $425.00 LEAD INST -3 CLASSES, ADMIN WK $700.00 REIMB -BLOOD TYPE TESTING $9.37 REIMB- PARKING CHARGES $4.25 PLUG, OIL, FILTER $130.50 PAINT $564.10 CONCESSION SYRUP $1,035.00 ALOHA BANNER, LEIS $28.27 BATTERY $249.21 BAIL MONEY- ACKERMANN $300.00 SAND & SALT $6,672.50 FILING FEES $28.50 JOINT PLAN -L &P SUPPLY /C.U.P. $839.00 REFUND - OVERPYMT OF FEES $146.00 REIMB - PARKING, REGISTRATION $38.00 MESH NETS $683.98 41 B WEAR, IN FINES $440.27 REFUND -SR TOUR $30.00 UNIT RENTAL- ARMORY & PARK $87.86 LINEAR FOOT CHARGE $14.42 JUNE -AUG SERVICE $54.32 UMPIRE GAMES $210.00 ELEVATOR SERVICE $73.65 SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATION $252.00 TEAM MEMBERSHIPS $121.00 VEHICLE TOW $63.92 SUPPLIES $348.59 JACK STANDS $131.73 REG -LENNY RUTLEDGE $65.00 SUPPLIES $305.74 ENVELOPE WALLET $20.72 SIGNMASTER JUMBO $15.10 ALLOY CHAIN W/ CLEVIS $152.98 MATERIALS, LABOR, SERV CHG $111.29 REFUND -DANCE PERMIT $50.00 ANTS $3.46 GUEST SPEAKER FEE- D.A.R.E. $100.00 BRITE STRIPE WHITE $436.65 PIZZA, POP $31.39 GLOVES $74.71 DAREN BEANIE BUDDY $62.98 • • • OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 3 ____ GENERAL FUND _- - - - - -_ - -_____ REGION VI CHIEFS ASSC MEMBERSHIP DUES ___ - - -__ $30.00 - REINER IRRIGATION & SEPTIC SERVICE CALL- SPRINKLER HEADS $45.00 REINER LANDSCAPING 4' FABRIC $183.18 • REMUND, GENE REFUND - CANCELLED SHELTER $25.00 RIDER BENNETT EGAN & ARUNDEL PROFESS SERV $115.50 RUNNING'S SUPPLY SHOOT HOUSE MATERIALS $1,393.73 RUTHLEDGE, LENNY REIMS- MILEAGE $71.38 SCHMELING OIL CO DIESEL FUEL $704.70 SCHMELING, MEGAN REFUND- CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS $44.00 SCHROEDER KYLE WEB PAGE DEVELOPING $275.00 SEWING BASKET ALTER UNIFORMS $178.92 SHARE CORP PROPDXY, SOLVENT, LUBRIGEL $389.23 SHOPKO BATTERIES $15.92 SHRED -IT SHREDDING SERVICE $54.95 SIMONSON LUMBER CO COMMON NAILS $3.67 SLABJACKING SPECIALITIES FILLED CATCH BASIN $310.00 SR.CENTER ADVISORY BD REIMB -SR NEWSCASTER POSTAGE $165.00 STANDARD PRINTING RUBBER BANDS $268.12 STARK, THERESA REFUND -ADV CAMP -CLASS FULL $25.00 STOTTS, CASEY LEAD INSTRUCTOR -1 CLASS $100.00 STURGES, JASON LEAD INSTRUCTOR -1 CLASS $100.00 SUBWAY PORTION PLATTER $32.80 SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $117.00 TELECKY, JOSH REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS $60.00 TILTON, DAVID UMPIRE GAMES $180.00 TRAF 0 TERIA SYSTEM CUSTOM PRINTING $192.39 TREE TRUST REG FEE -MARK SCHNOBRICH $25.00 TRI CO WATER COND WATER $163.18 TWO WAY COMM INC CELL PHONE $664.06 UNITED BLDG CENTERS DOOR BOTTOM, SILICONE $214.42 US OFFICE PRODUCTS CABINET $8.79 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $1,137.81 US WEST COMMUN JUNE SERVICE $166.20 USI INC CARRIERS $19.24 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS STAMP, FAX ROLLS $25.50 VOELKER, KATHIE CANCELLED- CHEERLEAD, DISCOVERY $44.00 WAL -MART CRAFT SUPPLIES $156.13 • WARNING LITES OF MN MN /DOT VEST $554.42 WASTE MANAGEMENT JUNE SERVICE $1,600.61 WISCHNACK, JULIE REIMB- MILEAGE $39.00 WRIGHT, LEE UMPIRE GAMES $126.00 XEROX CORP COPIER LEASE $723.44 <*' $103,041.34* HUTCH COMM DEV.0 HUTCHINSON LEADER PROPERTY SALE $42.51 HUTCHINSON TEL CO JUNE SERVICE $141.82 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER FILING FEES $78.00 MORE 4 POP, ROLLS $18.15 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $37.63 < *' $318.11* HUTCH TRANS FAC. CENTRAL MCGOWAN FACESHIELD $27.55 COAST TO COAST KEY, THREAD ROD $67.52 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS $392.19 HUTCH COOP CENEX FUEL $10,232.79 HUTCHINSON TEL CO JUNE SERVICE $568.09 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES MAY UTILITY $1,772.18 INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM SERVICE FUEL CARDS W/ ENCODING $97.71 JERABEK MACHINE SERV FLAT & ANGLE CUTS $8.68 KLEESPIE SWITCH, LABOR, MILEAGE $218.24 NELSON CONSTRUCTION CO. FLOOR PATCHING $276.56 SNAP ON TOOLS CORP TOOLS $158.43 SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $78.00 TEK MECHANICAL LABOR, FREON $221.68 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $8.36 WITTE SANITATION MAY SERVICE $62.86 $14,190.84* OJRA� FUNDS MORE 4 SHAPE UP CHALLENGE $108.56 *' $108.56* LIBRARY FUND DS FIRSTAR SANK OF MINNESOTA AGENT FEES $218.38 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 4 < *> - - -__ _ ___________ $218.38* LIQUOR STORE AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL LAUNDRY DELIVERY $162.55 BELLBOY CORP MAY MISC $2,078.55 BERNICKS PEPSI COLA POP PURCHASE $580.50 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL ETC RENEWAL REGISTRATION $250.00 C & L DISTRIBUTING MAY BEER $34,917.39 CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD STAMPS $204.03 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LIQUOR PAYMENT -TO W/S FUND $37,540.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN PAYROLL 6/2/00 $8,023.04 CROW RIVER PRESS INC BUSINESS CARDS $13.61 DAY DISTRIBUTING MAY BEER $1,781.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. MAY WINE $271.40 GLENCOE ENTERPRISE MAY ADVERTISEMENTS $225.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MAY MISC $17,911.92 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE MAY BEER $2,955.70 HENRYS FOODS INC TOBACCO PURCHASE $786.54 HERMEL WHOLESALE TOBACCO $150.68 HUTCHINSON LEADER NEWSPAPER ADS $1,221.64 HUTCHINSON TEL CO JUNE SERVICE $220.70 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES MAY UTILITY $1,245.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. MAY MISC $2,136.61 K D U Z MAY RADIO ADS $149.00 KKLN RADIO ADS $560.00 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC MAY BEER $6,174.50 LOCHER BROS INC MAY BEER $29,395.05 MORE 4 CHEESE, SUPPLIES $72.66 NORTH STAR ICE 20# ICE $132.00 PAUSTIS & SONS MAY WINE $696.00 PINNACLE DISTRIB TOBACCO $398.11 PRO AUTO CLEAN AUTO CLEAN $95.00 SLEEPY EYE FLORAL & GREENHOUSE FLORAL ARRANGEMENT- HANSEN $31.95 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY SUPPLIES $616.61 STANDARD PRINTING CASSETTES $109.07 TRI CO WATER COND WATER $81.48 TWO WAY COMM INC BATTERY $47.93 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $119.35 VIKING COCA COLA POP PURCHASE $542.80 WASTE MANAGEMENT APRIL SERVICE $52.35 WINE COMPANY, THE MAY WINE $392.00 < *> $153,143.05* PUBLIC SITES MCLEOD COOP POWER APRIL ELECTRICAL HOOKUPS $4,800.00 < *> $4,800.00* RURAL F. D. CITY OF HUTCHINSON MAY FUEL $48.17 < *> $48.17* WATER /SEWER FUND ALL -MICRO INC INSTALL SOFTWARE, UPGRADE UNIT $2,652.68 AM.PAYMENT CENTERS JUNE -AUG SERVICE $76.0D CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD CLEANING SUPPLIES $178.92 CITY OF HUTCHINSON MAY FUEL $1,042.01 COAST TO COAST SUPPLIES $543.17 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS FREIGHT CHARGES -PLT GEAR CASE $599.72 CUSTOM MADE EQUIP WELDING DRILL $5.00 CZECH, RANDY REIMB- RECERTIFICATIONS $46.00 D.P.C.IND.INC 150# CYL $275.77 DONOHUE & ASSOC PROFESS SERV - BOISOLIDS DRYING $8,461.95 DYNA SYSTEMS HARDWARE $672.93 G & K SERVICES UNIFORMS $608.48 HANSEN TRUCK SERVICE PUNCH CLIPS $26.63 HARRIS COMPANIES MAY SERVICE MAINT $1,280.00 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON FILTER BAGS, ASSURANCE $38.89 HUTCH COOP CENEX SUPPLIES $307.18 HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO PARTS, LABOR -WWTP $119.70 HUTCHINSON LEADER BAG COMPOST $118.92 HUTCHINSON TEL CO JUNE SERVICE $855.74 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES MAY UTILITY $23,272.67 • HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE BELT $28.70 INFRATECH BLUE MARKING FLAGS $34.49 JEFF'S ELECTRIC LABOR -WWTF $40.00 JLR GARAGE DOOR SERVICE CAPACITAR $84.81 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 5 - - ------ WATER /SEWER FUND --- - -- --- --- JUDI, CONTRACTING CO --- ---- ------- ------- HYDRANT, ROCK, BACKHOE, LABOR - $2,483.00 --- K MART PHONE $10.64 L & P SUPPLY CO OIL, FILTER, KNOB $98.46 LAMPLIGHTER II CHARGED MEAL $42.51 LIP ENTERPRISES REPAIRS TO WELL #6 $9,418.79 MCC INC BIOSOLIDS DRYING FACILITY $137,988.00 METTLER TOLEDO INC LAB PREVENTIVE MAINT $384.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH QTR 2 CONNECTION FEES $5,070.00 MN VALLEY TESTING LAB LAB TESTS $322.75 MPCA OPTION D REGISTRATION PERMIT $804.33 NCL LAB SUPPLIES $120.93 RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP BIOSOLIDS DRYING ADDITION #1 $221,041.80 ROSENOW, PAUL REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS $49.99 RUNNING'S SUPPLY WRENCH $33.14 RUTZ PLBG & HTG 1" BLK T -C PIPE $43.61 SEH PROFESS SERV -SOUTH TRUNK II $23,717.69 SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL MAY LOADS $12,144.87 STANDARD PRINTING CARDSTOCK $42.60 STAR TRIBUNE NEWSPAPER SERVICE THRU 6/2001 $111.80 STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES P &H HOIST LABOR $230.00 SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE $41.60 TRI- COUNTY ELECTRIC MOTOR SERV BEARINGS, REWND MATRL, LABOR $1,569.74 TWO WAY COMM INC BATTERY $47,93 US FILTER /WATERPRO METER PARTS $2,926.13 US POSTAL SERVICE MAY POSTAGE $1,115.31 WAL -MART BATTERY $38.78 WARNING LITES OF MN MN /DOT VEST $161.49 WASTE MANAGEMENT MAY SERVICE $31,114.16 WELCOME NEIGHBOR APRIL LISTING $60.00 *� $492,604.41* $808,473.21* • 2 IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (16:05) page L -_ ---------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------- 1-'� _.:2ROV. BDS FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA PAYING AGENT FEES $268.38 <-> $268.38* GENERAL FUND ARNOLD & MCDOWELL REIMB- WITNESS EXPENSES $66.00 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS SHIPPING ATHLETIC GOODS $312.00 DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DNR FEES TO STATE $2,527.00 GOV FINANCE OFFICERS ASSC 1999 APPLICATION FEE $480.00 HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER PAINT $92.66 HUTCHINSON SENIOR DINING REFUND MONEY RECEIVED IN ERROR $29.99 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF FISH & GAME $533.50 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA BAIL MONEY $490.00 MEEKER CTNY SHERIFF'S DEPT CIVIL PROCESS $20.00 MN ORCHESTRAL ASSOC. ADAP REC TOUR -30 TICKETS $1,440.60 MNAPA REG- J.WISCHNACK $40.00 MPCA PERMIT APPLICATION $240.00 NEW LIFE INDUSTRIES T- SHIRTS $236.50 SIBLEY COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA BAIL MONEY $74.80 STATE TREASURER AIRPORT LICENSE RENEWAL $15.00 STEARNS COUNTY COURT ADMINISTR BAIL MONEY $168.00 STONE, SUSAN REIMBURSE - WITNESS EXPENSES $28.70 < *> $6,794.75` ;IQUOR STORE CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN PAYROLL 5/19/00 $8,538.42 MN DEPT OF REVENUE MARCH TAX PAYABLE $19,095.00 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR PURCHASE $7,229.75 <`> $34,863.17* PAYROLL FUND AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $545.00 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $27.88 CITY OF HUTCHINSON EE CONTRIB 6/2 $1,974.16 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $100.00 H.R.L.A.P.R. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $213.13 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST EE CONTRIB 5/27 $2,238.46 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE CHILD SUPPORT $162.89 PERA LIFE INS CO. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $132.00 PERA- D.C.P. EE CONTRIB 6/2 $52.02 PRUDENTIAL EE CONTRIB 6/2 $75.00 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS EE CONTRIB 6/2 $30.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES EE CONTRIB 6/2 $17,124.93 TEMPLETON INC EE CONTRIB 6/2 $270.00 WADELL & REED EE CONTRIB 6/2 $150.00 < *> $23,095.47* SCOP 97 Hsg Reh EVEN -TEMP CONSTRUCTION WRAP EXT WINDOW & DOOR TRIM $2,200.00 < *> $2,200.00* WATER /SEWER FUND ANDERSON,SCOTT PAINTING & BLASTING SERVICE $1,310.00 EBERT, RICHARD RUTTGER'S BAY DEPOSIT $160.00 GOPHER STATE CONTRACTORS REFUND PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 GOPHER STATE INC APRIL CALLS $86.40 HUTCH COOP CENEX SUPPLIES $102.64 MN DEPT OF HEALTH REG -DICK EBERT $68.00 RUNNING'S SUPPLY CHARGER $330.56 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE LODGING- R.EBERT $617.96 <`> $2,728.81* $69,950.58* i • • Hutchinson Fire Department Monthly Council Update May 2000 The fire department responded to 35 calls for service in May, this is the breakdown of those calls: City Calls - Residential 1 Commercial/Industrial 7 Multi - family 6 School Type 3 Rescue 3 Hazardous Material 2 Vehicle I Grass Type 1 Carbon Monoxide 3 Sky -Warn 1 Rural Calls - Rescue 2 Farm Buildings 1 Medicals 1 Grass Type 3 Drills/Meetings/Goodwill SCBA Maintenance Emergency Driving Certification Annual Hose Testing Live Burn with the Dassel Fire Department Work on the training site McLeod County Chiefs Meeting Memorial Day Parade E H.F No. 4078, 4th Engrossment hctp:; /w . revisor. leg. state.mn.us ... dbil1.pl ?bill- H4078.4&session =ls8 77.25 13, is amended to read: 77.26 Subd. 13. Hutchinson Community 77.27 Civic Center ,000,000 C� 77.28 For a grant of up to S1.000.000 to the l J 77.29 city of Hutchinson to design, 77.30 ^---t_.._� ., ac- - -- 77.31 and remodel facilities for e community e \ 77.32 civic center, subject to the 77.33 requirements of Minnesota Statutes, G y 77.34 section 16A.695. This appropriation is 77.35 not available until the commissioner �Q 77.36 has determined that an equal amount has 77.37 been committed from nonstate sourc . r 404, section 27, is amended to 77.39 read: 77.40 Sec. 27. [BOND SALE AUTHORIZATIONS.] 77.41 Subdivision 1. [BOND PROCEEDS FUND.] To provide the money 77.42 appropriated in this act from the bond proceeds fund, the 77.43 commissioner of financ -- Fa q uest of the -- i er, shall sell 77.44 and issue bonds of the state in an amount up to $463,795,000 in 77.45 the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect prescribed by 77.46 Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.631 to 16A.675, and by the 77.47 Minnesota Constitution, article XI, sections 4 to 7. 77.48 Subd. 2. [TRANSPORTATION FUND.] To provide the money 77.49 appropriated in this act from the transportation fund, the 78.1 commissioner of finance en - ~ o f _ ^ _c j r e, shall sell 78.2 and issue bonds of the state in an amount up to$34,000,000 in 78.3 the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect prescribed by 78.4 Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.631 to 16A.675, and by the 78.5 Minnesota Constitution, article XI, sections 4 to 7. The 78.6 proceeds of the bonds, except accrued interest and any premium 78.7 received on the sale of the bonds, must be credited to a bond 78.8 proceeds account in the state transportation fund. 78.9 Sec. 79. Laws 1999, chapter 223, article 1, section 2, • 78.10 subdivision 2, is amended to read: 78.11 Subd. 2. Business and Community 78.12 Development 38,488,000 28,186,000 78.13 Summary by Fund 78.14 General 25,338,000 15,486,000 78.15 TANF 1,500,000 1,500,000 78.16 Environmental Fund 700,000 700,000 78.17 Workforce 78.18 Development Fund 10,950,000 10,500,000 78.19 $5,017,000 the first year and 78.20 $4,017,000 the second year are for 78.21 Minnesota investment fund grants. Of 78.22 this amount, $1,000,000 in the first 78.23 year is a one -time appropriation and is 78.24 not added to the agency's budget base. 78.25 $400,000 the first year is for a 78.26 one -time grant to Advantage Minnesota, 78.27 Inc. The funds are available only if 78.28 matched on at least a dollar- for - dollar 78.29 basis from other sources. The 78.30 commissioner may release the funds only 78.31 upon: 78.32 (1) certification that matching funds 78.33 from each participating organization 78.34 are available; and 78.35 (2) review and approval by the 78.36 commissioner of the proposed operations 78.37 plan of Advantage Minnesota, Inc. for 78.38 the biennium. 78.39 $14,067,000 the first year and • 78.40 $14,073,000 the second year are for the 78.41 job skills partnership program. If the 78.42 appropriation for either year is 78.43 insufficient, the appropriation for the 78.44 other year is available. Of this 53 of 59 05/22/2000 11:38 AN Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Brenda Ewiuman Resources Coordinator RE: Pay Equity Notice of Compliance DATE: June 5, 2000 i 1 1111; I am pleased to report that the City of Hutchinson has received from the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations (DOER) notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Information was submitted to DOER in January and was reviewed for compliance. The compliance letter and certificate received from DOER are herein attached. We have been notified that our next pay equity report is due January 31, 2003, If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your convenience. Enc. t_ Minnesota 4 Department of Employee Relation Srace of iNtinnesora: Employer of Choice May 30, 2000 Brenda Ewing H.R. Coordinator Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street S.E. Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Dear Ms. Ewing: Congratulations! I am very pleased to send you the enclosed notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Since the law was passed in 1984, jurisdictions throughout Minnesota have been working diligently to meet the requirements of the act, and I • commend your hard work and commitment to achieving compliance. As you know, Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920 specifies the procedure and criteria for measuring compliance, and information about your situation is enclosed. If you have any questions about the materials or about pay equity in general, please contact me at (651) 296 -2653. One of the things the rule requires is that our department notify each jurisdiction when the next pay equity report is due. In your case, this date is January 31, 2003, and we will be sending you forms and instructions at a later time. Also, this notice and results of the compliance review are public information and must be supplied upon request to any interested party- Again, congratulations on your achievement! Sincerely, Faith Zwemke Pay Equity Coordinator • Attachments 200 Centennial Office Building • 658 Cedar St. • St. Paul, MN 55155 -1603 • (651) 297 -1184 • M (651) 282.2699 An equal opportunity employer Notice of Pay Equity Compliance presented to City of Hutchinson for successfully meeting the requirements of the Local Government Pay Equity Act M.S. 471.991 - 471.999 and Minnesota rules Chapter 3920. This notice is a result of an official review by the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations of your 2000 pay equity report. Your cooperation in complying with the local government pay equity requirements is greatly appreciated. May 30, 2000 Date 0U Julien C. Carter Commissioner N Gr i 1c), is, HUiCHINSON LIGHT TRAFFIC ADVISORY BOARD Minutes May 8, 2000 Present: Ed Doring, Rick Larson, Leslie and Lucille Smith, Brian Bonte, and Dave Conrad Absent: Timm Grages, Archie Woodworth, John Mallak, and Kay Peterson Staff Present: John Rodeberg, Dolf Moon, Brenda Ewing and Holly Kreft The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rick Larson at 5:37 p.m. UPDATE BY BRENDA EWING ON COUNTY -WIDE TRANSIT TRANSITION Brenda updated the Board of the Transit Transition. She stated that the process was continuing and that the dispatch was still utilizing space in City Center. She added that some staff was still needed including a couple of dispatchers and an operations manager. She also stated that there was a toll -free number available and that pick -ups outside of city limits were starting. She explained that marketing would probably not be done until they were at full staff. Both Brenda and John stated that MNDOT's long term goal was for a regional transit system. Brenda added that MNDOT has already recommended software to use that would be consistent throughout the transit systems. tL REVIEW OF BIKE AND BLADE BONANZA Dolf stated that 281 participants had registered for the event with an additional forty for the lunch and obstacle course. He added that there were no waiting lines this year and that the number of volunteer staff seemed to be sufficient. He did explain that they might consider a two-hour event in the future, instead of the three -hour event. He also added that they might consider a timeline of 10:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. with the drawing at noon. Dolf stated that there were few complaints listed on the evaluation forms, but did comment that the obstacle course may not be challenging enough for the 9 and older age group. He added that hopefully next year there would be a law enforcement officer in the classrooms to present information prior to the event. He estimated that about 2,800 helmets and 3.200 participants have been part of the event over the last six years. The Board questioned if something could be done to present the history of the event. Dolf stated that it could be part of the spring brochure which is sent to over 8.000 households. r� Page 2 III. NEW "GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FA CILITIE S" John presented the 1999 guide and added that he did have it available for copying. He stated that it was developed as a national guide over many years, and it is the first comprehensive. National (AASHTO) manual. He also added that the Public Works Department would be changing the diamond shape on the paths to a bicycle shape with an arrow indicating the direction. Discussion was held relative to how and when updates should be given to the City Council. It was decided to propose a joint meeting be held some time in January. It was decided that John would provide black and white copies for the Board member, except Dave Conrad who will have a color copy. IV. "SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL" INITIATIVE John updated the Board of the national push for legislation of safe school routes. He added that it was a large discussion item at the state bicycle conference. The Board questioned where money for such projects could be obtained. John replied that there could be federal monies available from sources that are currently recreational oriented. He also added that the City would be applying for a grant for the trail from Island View Heights to South Grade Road. V. OTHER ISSUES John distributed a letter that he drafted to possibly be mailed to commercial property owners, specifically those along Hwy 15 South, requesting a trail connection. He explained that with the increased use of the Hwy 15 trail, there was a greater need for connections. He also explained that this letter would be sent merely as a suggestion at this point. There was discussion as to the wording of the letter. The Board suggested that the letter be sent on letterhead and envelopes with the Advisory Board logo. VI. NEXT MEETING The next meeting will be held on October 9 Discussion points will include 2000 project updates and proposed projects for 2001. VII. DISCUSSION Discussion was held regarding the Tartan Park development. Dolf stated that a grant had been recently applied for, but the status of that grant was not known at this time. Discussion was also held regarding the Dakota Rail Line Corridor and that the Board would support maintenance of this corridor. tI t I I: u,.l .rt There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m. CI Memo TO: Mayor and City Council Members Frorre Brad Emans, Fire Chief cc: Gary Plotz, City Administrator Datm 06/02100 Rio: Need for additional career firefighters This memo is to inform you of the Hutchinson Fire Department's ongoing recruitment and retention problem. It will provide you with a clearer understanding of this serious public safety issue, as well as explain the need for career firefighters in our growing community. In the not so distant past, the Hutchinson Fire Department had 45 paid, on call firefighters (volunteer) • on its roster when functioning at full strength. Financial constraints, the struggle to recruit qualified firefighters and difficulty retaining trained firefighters forced the department to downsize this number to 40. Over the last several months, the department has lost sic firefighters due to job relocation, reducing the number to 34. This leaves the department operating at 85% of full strength. There is also the real possibility of losing one more firefighter in the next month. Looking at the personnel the department has currently, the average years of service is four. Nine firefighters or 26% of the department have one year of training or less. If the department is able to recruit enough qualified people to return to full strength, 38% of the department will have one year of training or less. One of the problems the department faces when recruiting new firefighters is finding enough people who have the time to complete all of the training requirements. It takes a minimum of one year to complete the classroom part of firefighter training. New firefighters are expected to attend 120 hours (each session is four hours in length) of classroom training at a technical college. In addition, new firefighters are also required to take 48 hours of First Responder training and 12 hours of Hazardous Materials training within the first year of service. This training is not cheap. The department covers only classroom and equipment expenses. It is a waste of department monies to continue training new people only to have them leave after one or two years of service. People simply do not have the time to donate like they once did. Jobs, families and recreational activities consume most people's lives. Furthermore, once a new firefighter finds out what the job is all about, he or she often quits. Television and the movies have glamorized the job of a firefighter. Unfortunately, being a firefighter is not all red lights and siren. It requires a lot of training, and it is hot, dirty work. Work that is often times unappreciated. E • Page 1 The Hutchinson Fire Department is not the only fire department dealing with recruitment and retention problems. In fad, d is a nationwide problem. Marry articles have been written that address this subject (see attached LMC article). Fire departments across the country are struggling to identify a positive solution to this seemingly intractable problem. The Hutchinson Fre Departrnent has taken measures to make sure the shortage in paid, on call firefighters does not endanger the lives of people who live in this community and the sunn ending area. The department has implemented an aggressive safety inspection program, as well as a comprehensive fire prevention program. Nevertheless, these temporary solutions will become less and less effective as thi$ community grows. As you are aware, the crty of Hutchinson has been experiencing tremendous growth over the past ten years and the trend is expected to continue over the next decade. The population growth has facilitated an increase in the number of calls for service, as well as diversified the types of calls. This in turn has changed the expectations placed on the department's personnel. As the community continues to grow to the south and west, the demand for better services and the need to maintain minimal response times will become critical. The Hutchinson Fire Department has had no choice but to consider and plan for a small, daytime career department The Hutchinson Fire Department would like to add one career firefighter in 2001 with fire inspection responsibilities and FMO (fire motor operator) capabilities. The department would like to add another career fuefghter in 2003 with fire prevention responsibilities. In closing, the Hutchinson Fire Department appreciates the City Council's willingness to consider its request for two, additional full-time people. If you have arty questions, please feel free to contact me at 234 -4211. • Page 2 I Municipal Fire Response: Time to Reconsider? By Kirby E. Kiefer t a recent workshop, Fire Chief Rick Lasky of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, discussed rescuing trapped firefighters. In light of the recent firefighter deaths in Massachu- setts and Iowa, his subject was especially timely. At a time when recruitment and retention of volunteers is a critical challenge, a serious injury or firefighter death could mean the end of a volun- teer fire department. Demographic and economic factors nationwide are work- ing against traditional paid -on -call or "volunteer" fire departments. As fire chiefs struggle to fill their parr -rime ranks, one serious incident could chnu- nate this popular, traditional, and economical way of providing a vital public service. What was apparent in Lasky's pre- sentation was that in every building where a firefighter required rescue, the structure became a total loss. Stopping the spread of fire became secondary to I rescuing the downed firefighter. From a city manager's perspective, we are confronted with two unacceptable sce- narios simultaneously: the serious injury or fine- of-dury death of an employee and an uncontrolled fire. If firefighters intend to make rescues and prevent the brain -death of victims, they must be on the emergency scene within four minutes. If they hope to perform significant property conserva- tion, they must be performing all the fire suppression tasks, simultaneously, before the five - minute point of "flash- over." In the Twin Cities merro area, suburban volunteer departments have trouble assembling six volunteers, espe- cially during daytime work hours. In rural areas, the situation may be worse. Strategies to consider. City managers are not without options. First, you can fund and implement aggressive fire pre- vention programs that target high -risk populations and behaviors. The Na- tional Fire Academy has produced fire protection program management classes both on campus in Emmitsburg (cost to the city: $100 /week for meals; travel, lodging and tuition are subsidized by the feds) and in weekend classes in Minnesota. The benefit -to -cost ratio of prevention programs is high. Automatic sprinklers, especially in residential structures, reduce the need for rescue and suppression activities by Elie fire department. Supporting a resi- dential sprinkler ordinance may spark political resistance from developers, but sprinklers' contributions to life safety are _legendary. Another strategy can be combined with any other intervention: prepare to write off any building wi[h an ad- vanced fire and accept the fallout. For years, the military considered structures to be expendable resources not worth risking firefighters in aggressive interior fire attacks. While resources for dealing with aircraft foes were awesome, the investment in structural firefighting equipment was meager. Creative solutions involving auto- matic mutual aid from neighboring departments can be arranged. An alb - ance between St. Louis Park, Hopkins, and Golden Valley uses career fire- fighters through the day and volunteers at night. If the response can be timely, this can be a great solution. If the entire team cannot be assembled within about eight minutes (and certainly within that 24- minute window), however, fire- fighter rescue and fire confinement might be impossible. Before entering into such an agree- ment, city managers should ask what will happen when the city's entire day- time response force (often as few as a half dozen firefighters) is at an incident in a neighboring community. Remem- ber, similarly lean forces from surround- ing communities are likely to be at the same incident, so you would be left with no response to an alarm in your own town. This situation is statistically predictable and is an entirely foresee- able factor for the administrator's risk management plan. If local employers are willing to cooperate, an appeal to their commu- rriry- mindedness may yield some sort of emergency work release of their employees who are also firefighters. In the past, it was quite common for busi- nesses to allow non - essential employees to leave work to assist with an emer- gency. With today's right labor market, employers may be reluctant to enter into such an agreement, but it is an option worth investigating. When all other options have been exhausted, and an adequate team of volunteers still cannot be assembled, force augmentation with career fire- fighters may become necessary. Costs could be controlled by creating a joint powers fire protection district to fund a small number of daytime career fighters who respond into any of several ad- joining jurisdictions. Local volunteers could fill our the required assignment and the neighboring communities could provide coverage for a second incident. Demographic changes are impacting the volunteer fire service nationwide. City managers have several options for fulfilling their responsibilities for mu- nicipal fire protection. Maintaining the status quo is probably no longer one of those options. r Kirby E. Kiefer is a specialist at the Minne- sota State Colleges & Universities' FIRE/ ENIS /Safety Center and a member of the International City/County Management Association. He has been afire service administrator since 1977. MAY/JUNE 2000 MINNESOTA CITIES 17 CITY OF RUTCHINSON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON TOTAL 75,809 99 TOTAL. 70,568 AOF SALE 28 SALES INC OR DEC 153,233 26,251 11,159 145,973 23,678 12,750 59 10 4 13,463 5 \ 2,400 266,452 252,969 100 H UTCHINSONZ etfrr*r, I IQUOR ORE COMPARISON J MAY 200 LIQUOR BEER NINE MISC. ---- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - ----- ------- 1 1,781 3,213 536 2 1,498 3,582 713 231 3 1,681 3,967 648 271 4 2,242 5,308 871 270 5 4,223 11,004 1,522 655 6 4,306 10,843 2,004 797 8 2,229 3,054 597 222 9 1,807 2,890 658 196 10 2,452 3, B19 650 134 11 2,990 5,561 1,022 300 12 4,865 11,011 1,804 704 13 4,403 9,011 2,411 506 15 1,626 2,864 418 278 16 1,848 2,565 379 213 17 1,993 3,945 668 179 18 2,802 4,728 1,050 216 19 5,229 12,698 2,315 756 20 3,845 9,616 1,491 766 22 1,709 4,000 705 194 23 1,928 3,186 492 206 24 2,805 4,979 918 271 25 3,974 9,887 1,539 421 26 6,620 14,711 2,364 818 27 6,053 13,911 2,635 770 29 HOLIDAY 30 2,052 3.423 700 185 31 2,414 1,414 710 277 TOTAL 79,435 166,189 29,818 9,978 99 TOTAL 75,809 153,233 26,251 11,159 \OF SALE 28 58 10 3 SALES INC OR DEC 18,968 1 tp , TOTAL TOTAL BY KEEN ____ __________ 5, 672 6,024 6,567 8,691 17,404 17,950 62, 308 6,102 5,551 7,054 9,873 18,384 15,331 62,295 5,186 5,005 6,785 8,796 20,998 15, 71B 62,488 6,608 5,802 8,973 15,621 24,513 23,169 85,086 0 6,360 6,083 13,243 285,420 266,452 100 • i � May -99 _________ __________ _________ _________ _________ __________ TOTAL LIQUOR BEER WINE _________ MISC. TOTAL __________ BY MEEK __________ 1 ___________________ 4,547 _________ 10,982 2,045 826 18,400 18,400 3 2,083 3,279 359 208 5,929 4 1,791 2,743 502 149 5,185 5 1,910 3,036 824 172 5,942 6 2,550 3,749 1,025 208 7,532 7 4,291 7,556 1,500 594 13,941 B 3,661 7,450 1,950 526 13,587 52,116 10 1,580 5,238 661 391 7,670 11 1,440 2,395 544 221 4,600 12 2,084 2,737 507 165 5,493 13 2,434 4,797 714 263 8,208 14 4,759 10,617 1,652 677 17,705 15 3,556 7,612 1,362 675 13,205 57,081 17 2,089 3,016 451 166 5,722 18 1,951 3,329 402 216 5 19 2,035 3,373 623 281 6,312 20 2,508 4,469 896 217 8,090 21 4,735 9,771 1,634 796 16,936 22 3,746 7,650 1,158 708 13,264 56,222 24 2,160 3,215 486 137 5,998 25 1,709 3,313 558 214 5,794 26 1,975 5,313 708 294 8,290 27 3,948 7,326 1,455 494 13,273 28 5,917 14,443 5,644 854 23,058 29 5,552 14,435 2,262 1,571 23,820 80,233 31 746 1,389 129 136 2,400 TOTAL 75,809 99 TOTAL. 70,568 AOF SALE 28 SALES INC OR DEC 153,233 26,251 11,159 145,973 23,678 12,750 59 10 4 13,463 5 \ 2,400 266,452 252,969 100 H UTCHINSONZ etfrr*r, I IQUOR ORE COMPARISON J MAY 200 LIQUOR BEER NINE MISC. ---- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - ----- ------- 1 1,781 3,213 536 2 1,498 3,582 713 231 3 1,681 3,967 648 271 4 2,242 5,308 871 270 5 4,223 11,004 1,522 655 6 4,306 10,843 2,004 797 8 2,229 3,054 597 222 9 1,807 2,890 658 196 10 2,452 3, B19 650 134 11 2,990 5,561 1,022 300 12 4,865 11,011 1,804 704 13 4,403 9,011 2,411 506 15 1,626 2,864 418 278 16 1,848 2,565 379 213 17 1,993 3,945 668 179 18 2,802 4,728 1,050 216 19 5,229 12,698 2,315 756 20 3,845 9,616 1,491 766 22 1,709 4,000 705 194 23 1,928 3,186 492 206 24 2,805 4,979 918 271 25 3,974 9,887 1,539 421 26 6,620 14,711 2,364 818 27 6,053 13,911 2,635 770 29 HOLIDAY 30 2,052 3.423 700 185 31 2,414 1,414 710 277 TOTAL 79,435 166,189 29,818 9,978 99 TOTAL 75,809 153,233 26,251 11,159 \OF SALE 28 58 10 3 SALES INC OR DEC 18,968 1 tp , TOTAL TOTAL BY KEEN ____ __________ 5, 672 6,024 6,567 8,691 17,404 17,950 62, 308 6,102 5,551 7,054 9,873 18,384 15,331 62,295 5,186 5,005 6,785 8,796 20,998 15, 71B 62,488 6,608 5,802 8,973 15,621 24,513 23,169 85,086 0 6,360 6,083 13,243 285,420 266,452 100 • i � 0 • is &7PU 7:77 PM Final (A) (B) (A)-(B) APRIL MARCH APRIL Charlpa 2000 2000 1988 CY vs PY $622,750 $564.644 $341,215 281,535 1,681.441 1,530483 - 1,114454 669,980 762,682 911,376 853,336 (90,651) 592,843 486,165 417,282 115.561 I IU I GIIINSON AREA IIEALTII CARE 1068,857 1,024,036 81,230 165,832 COnparatrve Baanca §Imm 255,188 (x6.358) 452.402 497.614 304.041 As of Aprl 30. 1999,) U • 103.087 67.008 (A) 68.741 (B) (A) (B) 20.330 (5.167) (5,167) APRIL MARCII APRIL Charge 2000 2000 1999 CY vs PY LIABILITIES AND FI INn _ an ANCES Sdule!il9ii!!! Curren LWWin 1 Cash and mveslmuls Operations $4,121,274 $4.411.969 S3,070.605 1.042.469 Cu rem malureles of 2 I:asb And aweslinGtls Selllimmed 4/1.659 496.629 426.182 50877 Laglear debt 3 SuL401al cash 8 hlxee6nente $4,598,933 $1,808,598 $3.505,5117 1.093.346 Accanls payable - trade EsWralad canhaaual 4 PahenUResdani receivables 12.811,518 11,664,765 11,151.150 1660.428 selltamerds -real 5 Allowances for bad debts (2,708,379) (2643,713) (3,042.991) 334,612 Accrued expenses - 6 Advances OW cmlratlral sll wan es (2,334 6151 (1.797,775) (767,121) Selarles 7 Nab Pahm hesidenl and Ilwd party — 12,564,696) PTO 5 parrot recewabes $1.538.303 $6,606437 $6,310,384 1,227,919 h4wasl 9 Sal Inured peOW wru 10 011w. wcmvdbtus cal 210,852 263,625 59.556 121,096 UN Cara tax payable I1 Invemo,,ea 643,986 644,600 603,597 40,369 Delarred lablines 12 Peeped expenses 132,572 120,649 90,042 52,530 Deterred revenue 13 Tolal Current Assets $13,124,446 $12,623,909 $10,589.166 2.535,280 Total CuneM Lwblltes 14 BOard DeamWedrFuntled Veo:ecialroc Invagilments $6,099,044 $6,247,721 $7.930,046 (1,831,002) 15 Investment m Joint Vadwes $77,385 $77,385 $83,160 (5.775) PM II A$$91! 16 Land 3165,696 $165.696 $165,696 0 17 Bungs 23,427,042 23,401,398 18,627,072 4,799,970 18 Aculmulated deprecralion (8,724 760) (B 645 965) (7,935.1221 (789836) Low term Debt (less current 19 Buildings less depreciahan $14,702,282 $14.761,433 $10,691,950 4.010.332 rrahrliesl 20 Egmpnard 12 605,176 12,565.321 12,110.466 494, 112 21 Mmuen4mod dopac,.duwe (8646.487) (8,553,957 ) (0 454009) (1 91,678) 22 Equymeem less delxeaelxxe $3,856,691 $4,011.38.1 $3,655,857 302,834 23 Cahn cunslnxaxxl 6 ee„xlxieernt 0 0 0 0 24 Conalwcliae in prOWess 40,756 40,757 2,460,568 (2 419 812) 25 Total Plane Assets 118.667,425 $18,979,250 $16,974,071 1,893,354 Fund Balance 01 f Sam 26 Deferred&anciig costs $108.084 $107085 $120608 (11524) 27 Total Funds $36,274,384 $ $35,697,051 2,577,333 Total Funds is &7PU 7:77 PM Final (A) (B) (A)-(B) APRIL MARCH APRIL Charlpa 2000 2000 1988 CY vs PY $622,750 $564.644 $341,215 281,535 1,681.441 1,530483 - 1,114454 669,980 762,682 911,376 853,336 (90,651) 592,843 486,165 417,282 115.561 1.105.266 1068,857 1,024,036 81,230 165,832 99.925 255,188 (x6.358) 452.402 497.614 304.041 148,361 96.033 103.087 67.008 29.025 68.741 65,530 48.411 20.330 (5.167) (5,167) (4,931) 4236) $5,548,826 $5,322,614 $4.450,040 1,066,786 $14,609.885 $14,810,922 $14,762,008 (152123) $18,117,673 $17901814 $16455003 1,862,870 $ 36, 2 74,36 1 $36,035,360 $35.887,061 2,577,733 Fm17nl Pam I Arson • 1: PM PM F9d I IUl CIIINSON AREA HEAL TI I CARE Cwnparatuve Balance" As of April 30. )999, u . • Frn9m1 Pam I arson (A) A (A) (0) (A) (B) (A) -(B) APRIL MARCII APRX Change APRIL MARCH APRIL Charge 2000 2000 1999 CY are PY 2000 2000 1999 CY ve PY ASSE LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES _SWiF!0 Aiseli CllrreM LlahfYes 1 Cash end meshoeols Operallors $4,121,274 54.411.969 53.078,805 1,042.469 Curets meprllles of 2 Cesh mxl rrveseuelrs Fell ensued _ 4 11,659 496.629 426.782 50,8 Lung helm debt 1622,750 1564,644 1341,215 281,536 J Su1MWal cash 8 inveshaerds 54.598,933 14,908.598 $3.505,587 1,093,346 Accords payable - bade 1,884 .444 1,530,483 1,114,454 569.980 Estimated conhadral 4 Paeenl/Resudenll iecervables 12.811,578 11,664,765 11.151,150 1660.428 sollema8s -nel 762.882 911,376 853.336 (90.654) 5 Allowances for bad debts (2,708.379) (2.643,713) (3.042,991) 334,612 Acauedaxpsrues- 6 Advances and conhadual allowances (2,584,a86) (2.334 615) (1 (767 Salaried 592,843 466,165 477,282 115.561 7 Nei pall"ies: dent and Osid party PTO 1,105,266 1 088,857 1,024,038 81,230 a pays lecavables $1.538.303 16686.437 $6,310,384 1,227,919 allerast 165,832 99,925 255,1118 (80,356) 9 SOB I aursd pog wile 452,402 407,614 304,041 148,381 10 Ouw, iewrvWaes lane 210,652 263.625 89.556 121,096 MN Cara lax payable 96,033 103,087 67,005 29,025 11 Inverrorues 643,9N 644,800 603,597 40,389 Delerred fi kwidies 68,741 65,530 48.411 20,330 12 Prepaid expenses 132,572 120,649 80042 52 Deterred revoraie (5,167) (5,167) (4,931) (236) 13 Taal Currerui Assets _ $13 $12,623,909 $10,589 2 To1W Ciarenl Liab"ied - 0,546,826 $5,322,514 $4,450,040 1,066,786 14 Board Ues:= aleeNFurirdwl L 'Wec.al_ L^vesL 16,099,044 $6,247,721 $7 , 930 , 0146 (1, 831 , 002) 15 Inveslmarr in JQHA yntlues $77,385 $77 $83.160 (5 . -MW As 16 Land $165,696 $165,696 $165.696 0 17 Buddugs 23,427,042 23,407,395 18,627,072 4,799,970 18 Acnmulated de "whon (8,724,760) (8 (7 (789 Lone -term Debt (leas curenl Is BmMlirgs less depre alarr $14,702,202 $14,761,433 110.691,950 4,010,332 mallribaral $14,609,sa5 $14,810,922 $14,762,008 (152123) 20 Lqugxland 12,605,178 12.565,321 12,110.466 494,112 21 Accmni4alad rWlx.n:�.nlxm _ (8,640,467) (5. 553,951 ) (9, 454,609) /5) 22 EqugxneW leas depinaalxxl $3,858.691 - -- $4011,361 $3655,857 _1191,6 302,834 23 Case cursluxaxrr 8 etpx(vnand 0 0 0 0 24 Colswwlxn in prugiess 40,166 40 2 (2 418 91 25 loat Plenl Assels _ $18,867,425 $18.978250 $16974071 1 Fund Be $18.117,673 $17901914 $16455003 1.662,670 Oft 951m 26 Delened financing costs $105,084 $107,085 $120606 (14524) 27 Trial FLmds $38.274,384 $38,035,350 $35,697,051 2,57 Trial Funds _ X38, $ $ 35,89 7, 05 1 2.5 Frn9m1 Pam I arson