Loading...
cp02-26-2002 c• AGENDA' REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION — Rev. Jim Hall, Word of Life Outreach Center �uTl 1`►l1Y Y BI.y (a) REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 12, 2002 Action - Motion to approve as presented 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 13, 2001 2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTHCARE BOARD MINUTES FROM JANUARY 15, 2002 3. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JANUARY 15, 2002 • 4. CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT FOR JANUARY 2002 5. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2002 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. RESOLUTION NO. 11878 —RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE/SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11879 — RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11880 — RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN, HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN AND DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN (c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 24 FEET TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 705 CHURCH STREET AS REQUESTED BY DAVID TIFFT WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1188 1) 2. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE FRONT AND CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK AND LOT AREA TO REPLACE A DEMOLISHED STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 605 BROWN STREET AS REQUESTED BY JEFF HAMILTON WITH • STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11882) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — FEBRUARY 26, 2002 3. CONSIDERATION OF A FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS SUMMERSET SECOND ADDITION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11883) (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF 2002 GAMBLING LICENSES AND 2002 TOBACCO LICENSE (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PAYMENT TO WM MUELLER AND SONS FOR SCHOOL ROAD SW STREET REPAIRS (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF DANCE PERMIT FOR EUGENIO TREJO ON MARCH 23, 2002 (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT APPLICATION FOR T.A.P. ENTERPRISES ON MAY 25, 2002 (h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3, LETTING NO. 8, PROJECT NO. 01 -21 (i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF FEE SCHEDULES (POLICY NO. 2.22) FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON HANDBOOK 0) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL FOR OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR JULIE WISCHNACK TO ATTEND THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION IN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FROM APRIL 14 — 17, 2002 (k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT -TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 3M CLUB ON APRIL 27, 2002 (1) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO PURCHASE 15 REPLACEMENT BEDS AS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE (m)RE- APPOINTMENT OF BOB PETERSON TO HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD TO 2006 Action — Motion to approve consent agenda 5. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M. - NONE 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REOUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) REQUEST TO OPEN SHOOTING RANGE FOR 4-H GROUP (b) E- DEMOCRACY PRESENTATION (c) UPDATE ON EVENT CENTER 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH CONSULTING FIRM 0 Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — FEBRUARY 26, 2002 (b) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEETING FOR MAY 9, 2002 AT 4:30 P.M. Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (d) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -304 AMENDING CHAPTER 11 (ZONING ORDINANCE) ADDING LANGUAGE FOR A NEW ZONING DISTRICT NAMED "GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT" (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR MARCH 12, 2002) Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR HUTCHINSON EVENTS CENTER Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (f) CONSIDERATION FOR SETTING COUNCIL WORKSHOP ON MARCH 26, 2002, AT 4:00 P.M. TO DISCUSS HDR WATER PLANT STUDY Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve 9. MISCELLANEOUS • (a) COMMUNICATIONS 10. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims A from appropriate funds 11. ADJOURN L L] MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER — 5:30 P.M. Mayor Marlin Torgerson called the meeting to order. Council Members present were John Mlinar, Jim Haugen, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. Also present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator and John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works. 2. INVOCATION — Due to the absence of Rev. Jim Hall, Word of Life Outreach Center, the mvoc'T as dispensed. 3. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 2002 Minutes were approved as presented 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 2001 2. UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2001 3. HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2002 • 4. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2002 5. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 6, 2001 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 02 -305 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR PROPERTY (RAVENWOOD DEVELOPMENT) TO BE REZONED FROM R4 TO R3 2. ORDINANCE NO. 02 -306 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR A PORTION OF PROPERTY (MODERN MAZDA) TO BE REZONED FROM RI TO I/C 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11874 —A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 4. RESOLUTION NO. 11875 — A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PUBLIC MATCH, RESPONSIBILITY AND SIGNATOR FOR CENTRAL MINNESOTA EMERGENCY SERVICES TRAINING CENTER GRANT 5. RESOLUTION NO. 11876 —A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN HOME RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM 6. RESOLUTION NO. 11877 — A RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE OF SEMI- TRACTOR • (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR GOPHER CAMPFIRE CLUB ON FEBRUARY 22, 2002 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 12, 2002 (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF STATE PREMISE PERMIT RENEWAL FOR . ELKS LODGE 2427 (e) DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY RELATIONSHIP FOR PAYMENT LOCK BOX PROCESSING WITH AMERICANA NATIONAL BANK IN ALBERT LEA, MN (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF MASSAGE LICENSE FOR RENEE SCHMELING (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR RANDY DEVRI)~S, DOUG JOHNSON, GARY PLOTZ AND MARLIN TORGERSON TO CHICAGO, ILLINOIS FROM FEBRUARY 24 — 26, 2002, TO VIEW COMPOST MIXING EQUIPMENT (h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR LISA GRINA TO DETROIT, MICHIGAN FROM FEBRUARY 19 — 20 TO EVALUATE LOGIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE (i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Mayor Marlin Torgerson appointed Kathy Hanneman to the Planning Commission. Motion by N linar, second by Hoversten, to approve consent agenda, with exception of Item 4(g). Motion carved unanimously. Item 4(g) was pulled for further discussion. Randy DeVries, Director of Water/Wastewater/Resource Recovery, presented that the equipment being evaluated in Chicago is needed to mix specific products at the compost site. This piece of equipment is needed to progress further in the project of the compost site. The main reason for out -of -state travel is due to the fact that there are no other municipalities that use this type of equipment, therefore it is necessary for city staff to travel to locations that have the appropriate, up -to -date equipment. Gary Plotz, City Administrator, noted that trips such as these have been very productive in the past for reviewing various pieces of equipment. An alternative to traveling to the site would be to hire an engineering firm to evaluate the types of equipment needed. Mr. Plotz further noted that by having city staff evaluate and sample the equipment, hands -on, it gives them a better idea as to how the equipment will operate. Randy DeVries stated that the entire trip will cost approximately $1000 and has been budgeted in the capital plan of the Compost fund. Mayor Torgerson noted that he has asked city staff to present a synopsis of the compost site project in April to educate the public on the products and services that are and will be available in the near future. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen, to approve out -of -state travel for Randy DeVries, Gary Plotz, Doug Johnson and Marlin Torgerson to Chicago, Illinois to view compost mixing equipment. Duane Hoversten motioned, second by Peterson to amend the motion to allow up to four people to attend this trip. Motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M. - NONE 3. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETTITONS • (a) PRESENTATION BY "HIS STANDARDS" Representatives from "His Standards" presented before the Council. This group voiced CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 12, 2002 concerns regarding adult- oriented (pornographic) materials supplied in local gas stations. The • group stated that they would like the community "cleaned up" and have this material removed from the area. They also voiced concerns that the current city ordinance is not being enforced. They stated that they had contacted the local police department with the enforcement issues and felt that they were "blown oft" with no action being considered. They are requesting that the ordinance either be revised or actively enforced. The group has also developed a petition to remove pomoVaphy from the area They also voiced opinions and statistics that these types of materials aid in the development of criminal activity, abuse, divorce, etc. and are very degrading towards women. John Mlinar asked the group what they would like to see changed in the ordinance. The representatives stated that the ordinance currently states that the material must be in an opaque cover with only the title shown. However, these materials are not in such a cover and show the entire front cover of the material, which usually show a Jude picture of women. They either want this enforced or they want the material pulled from the shelf if it is not enforced. Mayor Marlin Torgerson assured the group that the local ordinance will be enforced and the Council has the power to make sure that that happens. Marc Sebora, City Attorney, stated that the representatives are correct in their understanding of the ordinance. Mr. Sebora offered to meet with the group to speak about the ordinance and those businesses in violation as well as discuss with them the response they received from local law enforcement. • John Mlinar noted that a similar issue was brought up approximately nine years ago and as time goes by, enforcement tends to lax. He thanked the group for addressing the Council with this issue. 4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR SETTING CONTINUATION OF VISIONING WORKSHOP FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2002, AT 12:00 NOON (b) CONSIDERATION FOR SETTING JOINT MEETING WITH UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2002, AT 3:00 P.M. (c) CONSIDERATION FOR SETTING CLOSED MEETING TO DISCUSS MELIN LITIGATION Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to set closed meeting for February 19, 2002, at 11:30 a.m., Visioning Workshop for February 19, 2002, at 12:00noon and Utilities Meeting for February 19, 2002, at 3:00 p.m. Motion carved unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BIOSOLIDS DRYING FACILITY Randy DeVries, Director of Water/Wastewater/Resource Recovery, stated that a sprinkler system, as well as a few other items, need to be added to the original Biosolids design plan. This agreement encompasses the design of the fire suppression equipment. Duane Hoversten questioned why the engineering firm did not originally include this in the plans. Randy DeVries stated that the original plan received an acceptable rating, that did not include the fire suppression equipment. After an additional rating, it has been made mandatory that this CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 12, 2002 equipment be installed. • Marc Sebora noted that this agreement is to approve the design of the fire suppression equipment, not the actual equipment. Duane Hoversten stated that he feels that Donohue & Associates should pay for at least half of these services, due to the fact they probably should have included them in the original plan. John Mlinar asked for clarification whether or not the equipment inside the building will operate appropriately. Randy DeVries assured the Council that the equipment will operate appropriately. Marc Sebora stated that the City is in a Catch 22 position. In order to open the Biosolids facility again, this equipment will need to be installed. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve the engineering services agreement. Duane Hoversten requested that negotiations be made with Donohue & Associates to reduce the cost of the design fee to the City. Motion by Hoversten, second by Mlinar, to amend the motion to request that the maximum amount not exceed $6500. Motion carried unanimously. 9. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS John Mlinar — Mr. Mlinar noted that the last meeting of the 212 Corridor was held last month. A resolution is being requested by the cities along Hwy 212, and Hutchinson will be included in the approval of this resolution. Hutchinson is involved with this project because of the value of the Hwy 22 connection with Hwy 212. This resolution will be on the next council agenda for approval. Mr. Mlinar commended Terry Davis on the information he provided regarding the railroad. This presentation will be on the local access channel in the near future. Gary Plotz — Mr. Plotz noted that the he, Ken Merrill and the Mayor took part in the legislative hearing at the Capitol. This group presented to legislature the drastic reduction in funding as compared to other cities in Minnesota. A bill was proposed to increase local government aid by $500,000 to Hutchinson. Mayor Torgerson made it very apparent at the hearing that Hutchinson is definitely on the "short hand of the stick ". John Rodeberg — The Crow River Dam preliminary designs have been presented. Mr. Rodeberg requested that one council member be part of an organized group to brainstorm ideas as far as what they would like this area to look like. Kay Peterson and Marlin Torgerson volunteered to be part of this group. The Central Minnesota Emergency Training Center is in the design phase of the development of this project. The MPCA has permitted the City of Hutchinson to lead Phase II of this project, with the MPCA covering all expenses. This will allow for better control of the timing of the project. The City is working on a contract with Barr Engineering and a Joint Powers Agreement with the MPCA. Mayor Torgerson noted that Representative Ness assured him that funds are available for this project. Neighborhood meetings are being planned for those residents in areas where improvement projects are planned. Notices will be sent to those affected. The state faces the possibility of losing $100 million in federal highway funding. Mr. 4 3(o-) CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — FEBRUARY 12, 2002 Rodeberg noted that this may directly affect the City of Hutchinson regarding future development, in particular proposed improvements to TH7 in 2006 & 2007. 10. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, with Hoversten abstaining to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims A from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously. (b) VERIFIED CLAIMS B Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen, to approve and authorize payment of Verified Claims B from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously. 11. ADJOURN With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. • IV. The December 13, 2001 meeting of the Pioneerland Library System board was called to order by Chair Robin deCathelineau at 7:31 pm at the Lakeland Auditorium in Willmar. Roll was Gassed. Pl Clouse added P.A.9, n_,,,;. agenda. Al Clouse motioned to approve the amended agenda. Second by Art Abel. Carried. Lowell Ueland motioned to approve the Nov. 15, 2001 minutes. Second by Dr. Les Potas. Carried. Al Clouse presented for the Finance Committee. Al Clouse motioned to accept the Nov. 2001 financial reports. Second by Eric Weiberg. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to approve the bills and check registers. Second by John Baker. Carried. The Heritage Searchers proposed contract has been finalized with the Heritage Searchers reimbursing Pioneerland for the rider on our policy to cover their materials. Al Clouse motioned to accept_ the Heritage Searchers contract_. Second by Harlan Madsen. Carried. Part of the LSTA certification database grant has been revised. Al Clouse motioned to accept the revised LSTA grant. Second by Eric Weiberg. Carried. our Minnesota Deferred Compensation Program has insisted that they be able to withdraw their due dollars directly from PLS's account. We will open a separate account for this purpose as well as sending them a letter stating our disapproval of *_heir methods. Al Clouse motioned to accept the MN Deferred Compensation Program payment plan with a separate PLS account for that purpose. Second by Art Abel. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to accept the 20C2 and 2002 recommendations for budoet reduction with the "considerations" not being included in the motion. Second by Marlene Canfield. Discussion followed. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to accept the Madison Library funding reg_est. Second by T_vey Fonderharr. Carried. Fundina distribution changes are being considered for the towns in Swift County. The price of our current auditor went up 112 of a percent. Al Clouse motioned to accept the increase of the current auditor. Second by Darlene Kotelnicki. Discussion. Carried. Ivey Vonderharr presented for the Personnel Committee. Ivev Vonderharr motioned to approve the hiring of Colleen Kassel at Grove City, Nancy Jo Wendt at New London, Ann Abramson at Litchfield and Mary Millard at Willmar. Second bv_ Al Clouse. Carried. Ivey vonderharr motioned to approve the oolic_v chances to 204, 901, 1101, 1102, 1104, 1201, 1603 & 2301. Second by Lowell Ueland. Lengthy discussion. Carried on vote 25 yes, 3 opposed. The committee is looking at issues regarding the new exempt policy. They hone to have a new policy ready for review in January '02. There are two vacancies on the committee to be assigned under new business. There was some discussion as to paying a candidate to come for a job interview. The consensus tends to be opposed to the idea. There was no C_d Business. New Business. Marleen Canfield, Jeanette Buchanan and Teresa Hoepner are retirino from the board. Darlene Kotelnicki and Herman Hannemann were appointed to the Personnel Committee. -- John Houlahan presented the Director's report. We will need someone to replace Teresa Hoepner on the SAMMIE board. March 7 and June 6 are the next two meetings. If interested or you ha ^.e questions see Al Clouse or Herb Rotunda. The Nominating committee is to meet_ with the Director after the board meeting to set a meeting -.ate. Members from Willmar are to meet with Kathy Matson after • the board meeting. Al Clouse motioned to adjourn. Second by Marleen Canfield. The meeting was Stacey Schuette Secret - , { f ^ \ • 0 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING December 13, 2001 Number of signatories witk appointed representatives: 25 Quorum of signatories: 13 Signatories present: 21 Present Alvin Maas Mark Dahl Harlan Madsen Robin deCathelmeau Diane Bede Ivey Vonderharr Stacey Schuette Grant Knutson Amy Wilde Joan Reckdahl Francis Schweiss John Baker Gary Johnson Herb Rotunda Les Potas Bob Fleegel Marleen Canfield Lowell Ueland Art Abel Heenan Hanemann Roger Hibma Lowell Broberg Darlene Kotelnidd AI Clouse Jim Schueller Ramona Berg -Perry Mary Huesing Eric Weiberg Absent Nancy Grussing* Jack Johnson Barb Borth* Pete Scheffier* Laurel Silvemale* Teresa Hoepner* James Karels Bill Watson* Jeanette Buchanan* *Excused absence Big Stone County Chippewa County Kandiyohi County Kandiyohi County Kandiyebi Canty Lac qui Pare Canty McLeod Canty McLeod County Meeker County Meeka County Renville Canty Swift County Yellow Medicine County Appleton Bird Island Fairfax Glencoe Cxaceville Kerkhoven Litchfield Renville Willmar Willmar Willmar Chippewa County Chippewa County Kandiyohi County Yellow Medicine County Granite Falls Ortonville Willmar yL0.>> ANNUAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING — January 15, 2002 Hospital — Conference Room A/B Present Chairperson, Bob Peterson; Vice Chairperson, Steven Snapp; Secretary; Wayne Fortun; Duane Hoversten, Trustee; John Houle, Trustee; Pastor Randy Chrissis, Trustee; Dr. Jim Allen, Chief of Staff/ Trustee Others Present Phil Graves, President; Linda Krentz, Bums Manor Nursing Home Administrator; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support Services Division Director; Pam Larson, Finance, Information and Material Services Division Director; Jane Lien, Acute Care Programs and Services Division Director; Doug Hanneman, Editor Hutchinson Leader; Lori Wightman, Vice President of Operations, Allina Regional Health Services; Elaine Schermann, Quality Representative, Betty Stras, Foundation Director; David Schwebel, Colliers Towle Realty, Mall Manager; and Corrinne Schlueter, Recorder. The meeting was called to order at 4:45 PM. I. Minutes of Past Meeting. The minutes of the December 18, 2001, meeting were presented and discussed. Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by Houle, to approve • the minutes of the December 18, 2001, meeting. All were in favor. Motion carried. II. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes and Credentialing Dr. Allen provided a report on the recent Executive Committee Meeting. The following practitioners were recommended for membership to the Medical Staff. Reappointments: James Felling, PhD Psychology Allied Health Independent Steven Flinn, DDS Dentistry Allied Health Independent Keith Kamrath, DC Chiropractic Allied Health Independent Resienations: Paul Carey, MD Emergency Courtesy Jeannie Ware, CRNA Anesthesia Allied Health Independent Stefan D. Laxdal, MD Radiology Courtesy (retired) Miscellaneous: Dr. Allen Lira amendment of privileges Allen reported Dr. Lira's privileges have been upgraded. He is requesting to perform C Sections without supervision. Also reported was the recent promotion of Dr. Steven • Mulder to Director of Medical Affairs. The newly created position will be to assist the y La�a Board of Directors' Meeting January 15, 2002 Page two Chief of Staff with administrative duties. Also Dr. Mulder will spend a great deal of time on clinical quality initiatives. Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by Hoversten, to grant membership and privilege to the above listed practitioners, as recommended by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff. All were in favor. Motion carried. III. New Business. A. Plaza 15 Budget David Schwebel, Plaza 15 Mall Manager, was at the meeting to report on several improvements, which were made to the mall during 2001. They include a partial roof replacement, removal of concrete islands in the parking lot, sidewalk repairs and new lighting on the mall's outdoor canopy. Schwebel reported occupancy is assumed to be 100% by October 2002. The 2002 Budgeted Projects are: • Brick Replacement - $1,000 budgeted for exterior building and • planter brick replacement. • Roof Repairs - $98,300 for the final phase of roof replacement. • Parking Lot - $50,000 is budgeted for major repairs to the parking lot. • Sidewalk Repairs - $3,500 budgeted for sidewalk repairs. • Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Houle to approve the budget for the Plaza 15 Mall and authorize staff to proceed with the projects as outlined above. All were in favor. Motion carried. B. Strategic Plan Approval The 2002/ 2003 Strategic Plan was presented for approval. Graves reviewed the goal areas and strategies that were a result of the board and leadership planning retreats during the fall of 2001. Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Chrissis to approve, as presented, the 2002/ 2003 Strategic Plan. All were in favor. Motion carved. iI (� (a) D, Board of Directors' Meeting January 15, 2002 Page three C. Allina Management Agreement. Lori Wightman, from Allina, presented the proposed Allina Management Agreement. The last contractual relationship time frame was for a 3 -year period. Board members asked questions regarding whether or not the reasons to affiliate were currently applicable and if the current relationship continues to add value. Board members discussed a one -year contract term, during which, the value of the relationship with Allina is to be assessed. Following discussion, Hoversten made a motion, seconded by Chrissis to approve a one -year management contract extension with Allina Health System during which time period the need for a continued relationship will be assessed. All were in favor. Motion carried. D. Medical Staff By Laws Change. Graves reported recent revisions were made by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff, to the by laws. The change was initiated when the JCAHO issued standards clarification that answered the question of `under what circumstances an organization could give temporary privileges to a licensed provider." HAHC has now incorporated language to address this standards change into the bylaws. Temporary privileges would be granted if a provider had an important patient care need to fulfill. • Following discussion, Allen made a motion, seconded by Houle, to approve the Medical Staff By Laws change as recommended by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff. Motion carried. E. Master Site Planning Process. Graves reported on the current progress of the Master Site Planning Process. The overall goal is to create a twenty-year vision of the Hospital campus layout. The Burns Manor campus layout will be addressed through the Senior Care Planning Task Force. Nursing Home changes that may affect the south campus will be incorporated into the Hospital site plan. Graves requested the Chair, with approval of the board, create an Ad Hoc Committee of two members of the Board to assist, over the next few months, staff and the architect in finalizing the Master Site Plan. • Following discussion, Chrissis made a motion, seconded by Snapp to create an Ad Hoc Master Site Planning Committee and approve the appointment of Houle and Fortun to the committee. All were in favor. Motion carried. aAW a • Board of Directors' Meeting January 15, 2002 Page four F. Personnel Committee Membership. Graves reported the by laws require three members to be appointed by the Chair, with approval of the board to serve on the Personnel Committee. Historically the members of this committee have been the officers. Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Hoversten to appoint the officers of the board to serve on the Personnel Committee. All were in favor. Motion carried. G. By Laws Committee. Graves reported it has been a couple of years since the by laws of the Governing Body were reviewed. The Chair was asked to appoint, with concurrence of the Board, members to serve on an Ad Hoc By Laws Committee to review and make changes to the by laws of the organization. • Following discussion, Houle made a motion, seconded by Snapp to approve Hoversten, Chrissis, and Peterson as the By Laws Committee representatives of the board. All were in favor. Motion carried. • H. Omnicell Medication Automation System. The board reviewed a capital expenditure request to lease an Omnicell Medication Automation System. The primary use of this equipment is to assist in the reduction of medication errors and also to increase our charge capture rate because of the intended interface with our billing system. Because the system is changing technology, it was recommended that HAHC enter into a five -year capital lease rather than to purchase the equipment. The Pyxis Medication Administration is currently installed in two locations in the hospital; medical/ surgical and emergency services areas. In addition to the two replacement units, new units will be added in the cardiac care unit, obstetrics unit, the mental health unit, and operating suite. Two systems were researched: Pyxis and Omnicell. The lower priced unit is Omnicell. Following discussion, Hoversten made a motion, seconded by Fortun, to request authority from the City Council to enter into a five year lease with Omnicell for an Automated Medication System at a monthly lease amount of $6,094. All were in favor. Motion carried- Safety Committee Report Halverson provided the third quarter 2001 Safety Committee Report. • Following discussion, Chrissis made a motion, seconded by Hoversten, to receive this report from the Safety Committee and concur with the recommendations of the committee. All were in E favor. Motion carried. y�a� a Board of Directors' Meeting January 15, 2002 Page five J. Real Estate Purchases Peterson recommended the board empower Graves to explore, with the neighboring property owners their interest in selling real estate located adjacent to the Hospital. Following discussion, Hoversten made a motion, seconded by Houle, to appropriate the necessary resources and to authorize Graves to enter into discussion with property owners located adjacent to the Hospital, about their desire to sell real estate. All were in favor. Motion carried. IV. Organizational Reports. President Graves reported about the continuing negotiating with Blue Cross. The contract is expected to be finalized for 2001 within the next couple weeks. Acute Care Programs and Services. Nothing further to report. Care and Program Support Services. The JCAHO will be here on • January 25 and January 28 to survey the Lab. The security system is in the process of being installed. Community Care Programs and Services. Halverson reported on psychiatry recruitment. Our goal is to have five full time psychiatrists. We have been working with a local recruiter over the last couple of years and have only been able to recruit part time physicians. We have considered 18 psychiatrists and have made six offers and have not been able to hire a full time psychiatrist. The recruiter has said this is has been a difficult search and will require additional money to continue. Finance Information & Material Services. Nothing further to report. Resident Care Report Nothing further to report. Patient Safety and Improvement Committee Schermann explained how sentinel event alerts are handled within the organization. The gap analysis tool completed by staff in response to a sentinel event alert includes space for a description of items relating to HAHC prevention strategy, whether the gap was identified, a description of HAHC's compliance, exposure, remediation strategy, accountable party, and date due. Allina Report. Lori Wightman, from Allina, reported the Attorney General and • Department of Justice investigation with Allina is finished with the signing of the 1� Lc') D' u Board of Directors' Meeting January 15, 2002 Page six Corporate Integrity Agreement. Wightman handed out the Board evaluation process evaluation form. The evaluation of the Board will be completed in February. Accounts Payable. The accounts payable and cash disbursements were presented for payment. • Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Snapp, to approve the accounts payable and cash disbursements as listed in the amount of $1,716,448.51. Five were in favor. One abstained. Motion carried. is Statistical Report. Graves presented the statistics for the month of December 2001. Financial Report. The financial report was not available. The report will be deferred until the February meeting. Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. The Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes were presented. No unusual comments were made. Chrissis made a motion, seconded by Hoversten to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 6:55 PM. Respectfully submitted, Corrinne Schlueter Wayne Fortun Recorder Secretary q c0.)a MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2002 5:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Lynn Otteson, Brandon Fraser, Jason Olsen, Jim Haugen and Dean Kirchoff. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building; Melissa Starke, Recorder; and Dick Schieffer, City Attorney. Absent: Jeff Jones Planning Commission Reorganization Ms. Wischnack disbursed a letter to the Commission from Jeff Jones announcing his resignation from the board and the Mayor will be appointing a member to fill his position. Jim Haugen nominated Dean Kirchoff for Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. Motion by Haugen, second by Olsen to nominate Dean Kirchoff as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. • Dean Kirchoff, Vice President, called for the nominations of the Chair of the Planning Commission. Motion by Otteson, second by Olsen to nominate Bill Arndt as Chairman of the Planning Commission. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Motion by Haugen, second by Otteson, to approve the minutes from the December 18, 2001, meeting as submitted. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A.) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R4 TO R3 AND A SKETCH PLAN REVIEW AS REQUESTED BY ED RETTMAN JR., OWNER OF PROPERTY AT 1111 BLACKHAWK DRIVE SE Ms. Wischnack explained that currently this area is zoned as R4, which would occupy multiple -use housing (over S units). The applicant is requesting this area be rezoned as R3 for single - family dwellings. Ms. Wischnack explained that staff agreed that rezoning this area as R3 would not be a major issue. The total number � �Q�3 MINUTES —PLANNING COMMISSION —JANUARY 15, 2002 of units will be approximately 26 in this area. There are no airport safety issues in • this area. Ed Rettman, 564 Hassan St, explained that grading would be complete throughout the entire area. Mr. Rettman plans on selling the lots. If the lots do not sell, he would develop in phases. Mr. Kirchoff questioned whether or not the city would be requiring Mr. Rettman to move the current pond. Ms. Wischnack explained that the original plat has changed greatly as compared to the current application and the entire site plan needs to be re- evaluated. Motion by Haugen, second by Olsen, to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Motion by Haugen, second by Olsen, to approve rezoning this area from an R4 district to an R3 and approving the sketch plan review with staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. B.) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A MOTORCYCLE REPAIR, SALES AND PAINTING BUSINESS IN THE INDUSTRIAL /COMMERCIAL (I/C) DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY MICHAEL ANDERSON, APPLICANT AND BERNIE MCRAITH, OWNER LOCATED AT 700 AIRPORT ROAD • Ms. Wischnack explained that this application is for an expansion within an existing building. Ms. Wischnack explained that opaque fencing is needed outside the existing building. In addition, there are several disassembled vehicles outside of this building as well as unlicensed vehicles. These vehicles do need to be moved in a timely manner so that a "salvage -lot look" does not transpire. The septic area also needs to evaluated for maintenance. Sewer services may be installed as soon as 2003. There are several conditions that staff is requiring if this conditional use permit is approved. Height elevations of tree plantings will be researched. Michael Anderson, 455 Rose Lane, applicant, spoke before the Commission commenting that this would be an advantageous business for the community. Ms. Wischnack referred to the letter received from Yamaha MotorSports stating wishes that guidelines being applied to the newly annexed area on Hwy 7 will also apply to the developing area on and around Hwy 15 South. Mr. Arndt commented that the Planning Commission expects this area to look nice and kept up as a gateway to the city. Ms. Wischnack reported on the vandalism issue in this area and how it is being • addressed. y X0.)3 MINUTES — PLANNING COMMISSION — JANUARY 15, 2002 Mr. Fraser questioned where the gateway boundaries are set in the city. Ms. Wischnack explained that in the Comprehensive Plan it is clarified as to the areas incorporated into the gateway areas. Ms. Wischnack explained that when the Urban Design Guidelines ordinance is approved, the content would apply to other parts of the city as well and not just the area along Hwy 7 East. Mr. Schieffer explained that the conditions placed on this permit deal with the applicant and not the property owner. The property owner is currently not in compliance with the original conditional use permit when the building was constructed. Mr. Schieffer also noted that the Commission would have the ability to not allow any further expansions /additions until the property owner meets compliance with the current conditional use permit. Mr. Arndt recommended requesting a letter of intent from the property owner. Mr. Schieffer stated that a letter of intent would not be necessary, due to the fact the conditional use permit is already in place. Mr. Fraser questioned whether or not the property owner could be forced to meet compliance and not penalize the applicant regarding the new business. Mr. Schieffer noted that opening a conditional use permit could have ramifications and there could be alteratives to handling this issue. Motion by Fraser, second by Haugen to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Motion by Fraser, second by Haugen to approve the conditional use permit with • staff recommendations. Motion carried. (C) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 14 X 30 FOOT ACCESSORY TEMPORARY BUILDING FOR STORAGE IN AN INDUSTRIAL /COMMERCIAL (I/C) DISTRICT, AND REZONING FROM AN R1 TO AN I/C DISTRICT AS REQUESTED BY LOWELL BAUMETZ (MODERN MAZDA), LOCATED AT 585 HWY 7 W. Ms. Wischnack explained the site plan to the Planning Commission. There is a small piece of property connected to the north of the property that is zoned as R1 that needs to be rezoned as I/C. Ms. Wischnack explained that the original application submitted was requesting a temporary building, which staff denied. Mr. Baumetz submitted a revised application that includes a permanent shed -type building. Reasons for original denial by staff dealt with lack of windload/snowload information, setting a precedence with other businesses along Hwy 7 with this type of building, the placement of the building and the visibility of the building from Hwy 7. Staff questioned the ability to expand to the current building, however due to the drain field, this option was not feasible. A pumping agreement needs to be signed by the applicant with the city. This is • required of any business within city limits that may possibly have septic failure. 4&d3 MINUTES — PLANNING COMMISSION — JANUARY 15, 2002 Ms. Otteson questioned whether or not this structure could possibly be moved in the coming years. Ms. Wischnack explained that the applicant does have intentions to move this structure once underground improvements are made. Bonnie Baumetz, Modern Mazda, explained that the additional piece of property to the north was zoned in Acoma Township when the property was purchased. In addition, the small structure to the west of the current building will be moved, as well as the structure up for application. The structure being applied for will house a tow truck that is currently too large for the existing structures. Future plans are to expand the current building once it's feasible. Ms. Baumetz noted that the structure size is 10' in height. Motion by Otteson, second by Olsen to close the public hearing. Motion carried. In the staff recommendations section, Line 5, the word utility will be added to service lines. Motion by Haugen, second by Kirchoff to approve conditional use permit with staff recommendations. Motion carried. (D) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO PLACE A PORTABLE SIGN AT 1200 ADAMS STREET SOUTH, AS REQUESTED BY • KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, APPLICANT AND NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY, OWNER Ms. Wischnack explained that this is an annual request that has been grandfathered into this process, even though the ordinance no longer allows such a use. Motion by Kirchoff, second by Olsen to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Motion by Kirchoff, second by Haugen to approve conditional use permit with staff recommendations. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack explained that the Knights of Columbus is required to pay a fee for the signage, which is a new policy of the Council. (E) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CREATE A RECREATIONAL PARK FACILITY WHICH WOULD INCLUDE A SKATE PARK, BMX TRACK, SOFTBALL FIELD AND PLAYGROUND AREA WITHIN AN R2 ZONING DISTRICT, AS REQUESTED BY WORD OF LIFE CHURCH, LOCATED AT 950 SCHOOL ROAD SW Matt Jannich, Intem with EDA, presented the site plan information to the • Commission. Ms. Wischnack explained that Mr. Jannich assisted in her yLa-)3 MINUTES — PLANNING COMMISSION — JANUARY 15, 2002 • department through the month of December. Mr. Jannich explained that staff had concerns with the recreation area and the possibility of expansion in the future. The applicant explained that if expansion is completed, the recreation area would be removed. Staff is also recommending that the softball diamond change positions, so that home plate faces the southwest. Additional items addressed were hours of operation and supervision of the facility. Staff recommends approval with conditions. Mr. Fraser questioned whether or not the facility would be monitored at all times (7 days /week, 365 days/year). If this is not done, he suggested fencing be placed around the entire facility. Rev. Jim Hall, 1085 Randall Road and Brad Messner 835 Elm Street, presented before the Commission. Rev. Hall presented that this type of facility is needed within the community. Mr. Hall explained that there are 13 acres available behind the current church structure. Mr. Hall noted that the BMX track will require 2000 lbs. of clay. He is recommending moving the track to the north and the softball field to the south. Mr. Kirchoff questioned whether or not there would be outdoor lighting at the facility. Rev. Hall stated that there are no plans for outdoor lighting at this time. Mr. Kirchoff also suggested having posted hours at the facility. Mr. Arndt is in favor of switching the location of the BMX track and the softball field due to drainage issues. Rev. Hall addressed some of the issues brought up by staff and residents. One issue was the condition stating "no outdoor music ". Mr. Arndt questioned Rev. Hall on liability coverage. Brad Messner explained that he has spoken with the church's attorney and insurance company. The insurance company recommended having waiver forms signed by users. He noted that helmets will be a requirement in the skate park. He also stated that he has been informed by the church's insurance company that the insurance policy will cover all liability issues. Mr. Haugen questioned whether or not dusting from the BMX park would be an issue to area residents. Rev. Hall replied that he didn't feel that there would be any additional dusting that hasn't already occurred. If there is additional dusting, a process of watering the track down would be in place. Ms. Otteson raised the issue of outdoor music. Ms. Otteson suggested wording such as, "no permanent outdoor speakers ", as compared to "no outdoor music ". Rev. Hall noted that if outdoor speakers were installed by the church, the church would have control over the volume and type of music. • �L� 3 MINUTES —PLANNING COMMISSION —JANUARY 15, 2002 Kevin Messner, 86 Century Ave., presented on the topic of music being played outdoors. He encouraged the wording of "no music allowed" be removed from the conditions. He did state that if the church regulated the type of music being played, it would be less offensive to residents. Dennis Kahl, 960 Milwaukee Ave., owns the property to the north of the proposed developed area. Mr. Kahl's concern is that there is proper separation between the BMX track and future housing developments. Joe Wozniak, 1525 McDonald Drive, commented that speakers could be placed on the property facing away from the residents, even to the point that the residents may not be able to hear any sound at all. Mr. Schieffer suggested wording, "no outdoor music in connection with the BMX or skate park which creates excessive noise...." Rev. Hall also had concerns with condition #9 on the staff report. He wishes to see specific complaints listed. Mr. Schieffer noted that this condition is already addressed in the City Code. He also noted that revocation of the permit would most likely be a last resort if compliance issues have been addressed by the property owner. Rev. Hall noted that the church would build a burm if required between the BMX . track and the residential lots. Mr. Haugen questioned Item #2 and the hours of supervision. Rev. Hall stated that it is not feasible for the church to have someone supervising on site every day. This park will be open to the public and not just parish members. Mr. Fraser questioned whether or not a conditional use permit would be needed if outdoor lighting would be installed at a later date. Ms. Wischnack stated that staff would like to be informed if outdoor lighting is installed. Rev. Hall commented that no outdoor lighting is planned at this time for the purpose of activities being held after dark at the park. Mr. Fraser stated that an additional condition should be that if outdoor lighting is installed, it would require reviewal by the Planning Commission. Rev. Hall questioned whether or not that would pertain to security lights. Ms. Wischnack stated that security lights would not need a conditional use permit. Motion by Haugen, second by Kirchoff to close the public hearing. Motion carried. Motion by Fraser, second by Haugen to approve conditional use permit with the following amendments to staff recommendations: 1) striking the word • "volunteer" from condition #2; 2) strike "no outdoor music shall be played" in tA La�)3 MINUTES — PLANNING COMMISSION — JANUARY 15, 2002 condition #7, replacing with the wording "...relating to outdoor music being allowed in conjunction with the softball park and skating facility but would not create excessive noise to the residents" (wording provided by Dick Schieffer); 3) add condition #10 — an additional conditional use permit would be required for the installation of outdoor lighting for softball park/BMX track; 4) a revised site plan should be submitted before approval at the Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack reminded the applicant that a new site plan should be submitted to address the placement of the softball field and BMX track, as well as the separation between the track and the residential area. Mr. Kirchoff requested that Hunter's Ridge Church and Word Of Life Church continue working in a good relationship and that Word of Life continue to comply with requests of Hunter's Ridge. (F) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -304, AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 11 (ZONING ORDINANCE) ADDING LANGUAGE FOR A NEW ZONING DISTRICT NAMES "GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT" Ms. Wischnack explained that this is a first draft that was modeled after Mankato's Urban Design Guidelines. Ms. Wischnack explained the details of the draft. Much emphasis was placed on building design and construction, landscaping and fencing. Mr. Haugen stated that a definition is needed for transitional yard. Ms. Otteson questioned whether or not there was enough staff to enforce the landscaping portion of the ordinance. Ms. Wischnack stated that the City Forester would be able to handle the enforcement. Dennis Miller, contractor working with Bob Wiehr, Yamaha MotorSports presented before the Commission. Mr. Miller has concerns with the section pertaining to building design and construction, especially relating to precast panels. He has concerns with the expense incurred for "nicer looking buildings ". Mr. Miller also has concerns with no chain link fences. His example is that if Yamaha would like to display products, but does not want them to be stolen or vandalized, the only choice would be for them to have a chain link fence. Another issue would be the type of building used for storage. Lenny Greggis, Lester Buildings, requested that the Commission be sensitive to various types of material and not limit the type of material used. "Cheaper" material can be used and look very attractive. Mr. Miller commented on the buildings his construction company has done work • on and the ability there is to "dress up" the buildings. y 0033 MINUTES —PLANNING COMMISSION —JANUARY 15, 2002 Ms. Wischnack addressed these concerns by stating that this area is receiving the most scrutiny because of the extremely highly visible area, the "gateway ". Ms. Wischnack further noted that there is room to work with the types of structure under Section A (5). Mr. Schieffer noted that if there are no controls within the code, there will be no controlling of the design or of requiring applicants to provide the design of the building. Mr. Kirchoff requested that verbage from the C -5 district be incorporated into the ordinance regarding building design. Ms. Wischnack is requesting suggestions for revisions to present at the workshop being held with the City Council on January 22. Ms. Otteson noted that transitional yard needs to be defined, the purpose verbage from C -5 needs to be incorporated and the issue of materials needs to be addressed. Mr. Schieffer suggested that a title be assigned to the bullet "or similar or better materials....." as well as a process be assigned to this item. Mr. Haugen also suggested striking the word "better" out of "or similar or better materials..." Motion by Otteson, second by Kirchoffto close public hearing. Motion carried. Motion by Olsen, second by Haugen, to table this item until February 19, 2002. Motion carried. 4. NEW BUSINESS a.) Comprehensive Plan Open House - Tuesday, February 19, 3:00 -5:30 p.m. A second Open House will be held — Wednesday, February 20, 3:00 -5:30 p.m. Ms. Wischnack explained that there will be two open houses to share the Comprehensive Plan with the public. The open houses will be walk - around events with maps stationed at various locations. A public hearing will be held those same nights regarding the Comprehensive Plan. 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF • a) Tentative February Agenda LA 1c�3 MINUTES — .PLANNING COMMISSION — JANUARY 15, 2002 • Mr. Haugen noted that if anyone has a recommendation to fill Jeff Jones's position, they should provide such names to the Mayor for appointment. 7. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Haugen, second by Fraser to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. n 0 (A LaJ3 CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 22 -Feb-02 January 31, 2002 Date Date Interest Of Of Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount US BANK FHLB 5.52% 3/1101 919/04 370,000.00 Smith Barney FNMA M 5.35% 3730/01 9122/04 300,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.18% 9119/01 4/11/05 750,000.00 Smith Barney Sy Cap Corp 4.180% 9/25101 4/19/05 270,000.00 Smith Barney FNMA M 5.650% 6/14/01 6/14/06 300,000.00 Prudential pool 336914 7.226% 1231 96 02 01 2026 55,062.09 Expected life 6.2 years Smith Barney FHLB 6.245% 2/3/99 2123109 300,000.00 Prudentall pool 336399 7.270% 1231 96 02 01 2026 69,711.90 Expected life 4.1 years Prudential Fed Home Laon 6.00% 0128/99 01 28 09 200,000.00 Smith Ramey FNMA pass thru 7.50% 1220/95 06/01/02 28,584.28 Prudential FHLC 6.00% 1/14199 1114109 385,000.00 Prudential FHL 5.63% 822/01 222107 200,000.00 - Call 2118199 and theratter Marquette 5.60% 02 15 01 02 14 02 200,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.80% 9125/01 10/4/06 255,000.00 Smith Barney Money Market 2.11% 11/16/01 2/14102 777,407.40 First Federal 6379 4.600% 7131101 7/31/02 200,000.00 Prudential Money Market varies 12/4/01 Open 206,040.00 Marquette 1231'305 4.680% 5/31/01 5/31102 400,000.00 First Minnesota 2.420% 02/01/02 0627/02 500,000.00 First Federal 5.150% 7/12101 725/02 700,000.00 Citzens Bank 29887 5.600% 2/15/01 2114102 200,000.00 Marquette 2.390% 12/13/01 3/14102 700,000.00 Marquette 2.380% 1129101 3/28/02 400,000.00 $7,766,805.67 yLp�) 5 2002 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2002 January 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 January REVENUEREPORT - GENERAL January January YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCEPERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,034,108.00 3,034,108.00 0.00% LICENSES 225.00 950.00 950.00 38,700.00 37,750.00 2.45% PERMITS AND FEES 5,353.02 10,082.07 10,082.07 200,500.00 190,417.93 5.03% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834,450.00 2,834,450.00 0.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 37,394.69 43,500.65 43,500.65 1,274,876.00 1,231,375.35 3.41% FINES & FORFEITS 499.44 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 0.00% INTEREST 3,447.99 616.94 616.94 32,000.00 31,383.05 1.93% REIMBURSEMENTS 9,456.02 13,860.35 13,860.35 130,875.00 117,014.65 10.59% TRANSFERS 750.00 0.00 0.00 1,339,700.00 1,339,700.00 0.00% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 145.73 377.25 377.25 1,000.00 622.75 37.73% TOTAL - 57,271.89 69,387.26 69,387.26 8,946,209.00 8,876,821.74 0.78% 2002 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2002 January 2001 2002 2002 2002 2002 January EXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL January January YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED 001 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 4,231.79 4,062.65 4,082.65 62,664.00 58,581.35 6.52% 002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 21,576.50 20,505.20 20,505.20 235,467.00 214,961.80 8.71% 003 ELECTIONS 2.28 0.34 0.34 16,371.00 16,370.66 0.00% 004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 27,010.84 27,135.31 27,135.31 397,404.00 370,268.69 6.83% 005 MOTOR VECHICLE 15,480.62 17,195.08 17,195.08 172,899.00 155,703.92 9.95% 006 ASSESSING 0.00 0.00 0.00 38,000.00 38,000.00 0.00% 007 LEGAL 8,330.63 9,662.38 9,662.38 121,000.00 111,337.62 7.99% 008 PLANNING 10,589.96 9,806.23 9,806.23 134,879.00 125,072.77 7.27% 009 INFORMATION SERVICES 6,042.11 7,908.86 7,908.86 175,664.00 167,755.14 4.50 110 POLICE DEPARTMENT 166,221.37 181,184.29 181,184.29 2,276,076.00 2,094,891.71 7.96% 111 SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER 7,459.58 386.51 386.51 (386.51) #DIV101 115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 13.52 4.39 4.39 27,000.00 26,995.61 0.02% 120 FIRE DEPARTMENT 16,107.68 18,159.07 18,159.07 351,864.00 333,704.93 5.16% 130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 10,876.08 14,555.63 14,555.63 166,171.00 151,615.37 8.76% 150 ENGINEERING 31,979.46 38,263.59 38,263.59 451,467.00 413,223.41 8.48% 152 STREETS & ALLEYS 59,941.86 60,696.72 60,696.72 671,026.00 810,329.28 6.97% 153 MAINTENANCE ACCOUNT 14;710.07 706.94 706.94 (706.94) #DN/01 160 CITY HALL BUILDING 20,355.47 12,947.10 12,947.10 154,768.00 141,820.90 8.37% 201 PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTRA 21,580.09 15,771.52 15,771.52 186,603.00 170,831.48 8.45% 202 RECREATION 10,914.91 17,415.60 17,415.60 229,706.00 212,290.40 7.59% 203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 8,517.42 7,551.96 7,551.96 109,968.00 102,416.04 6.87% 204 CIVIC ARENA 39,095.45 19,372.13 19,372.13 271,693.00 252,320.87 7.13% 205 PARK DEPARTMENT 60,440.46 72,974.19 72,974.19 653,622.00 780,647.81 8.55% 206 RECREATION BUILDING & POOL 10,114.42 3,729.32 3,729.32 114,046.00 110,316.68 3.27% 207 EVENTS CENTER 1,734.72 1,734.72 77,092.00 75,357.28 2.25% 250 LIBRARY 3,773.24 2,843.91 2,843.91 129,377.00 126,533.09 2.20°/6 301 CEMETERY 17,643.91 8,196.69 8,196.69 125,625.00 117,428.31 6.52% 310 DEBT SERVICE 176,350.00 176,350.00 0.00°/6 320 AIRPORT 8,426.06 2,838.65 2,838.65 238,386.00 235,547.35 1.19 350 UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPE 41,783.31 37,477.93 37,477.93 781,001.00 743,523.07 4.80% TOTAL 645,219.19 613,106.91 613,106.91 8,946,209.00 8,333,102.09 6.85% yLp�) 5 2002 107,974.80 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 109,243.15 1,509,116.00 January 2001 2002 2002 313,250.20 214,289.89 2,821,111.00 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL January January YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE 1,322,513.00 MONTH MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,034,108.00 3,034,108.00 0.00 /u LICENSES 225.00 950.00 950.00 38,700.00 37,750.00 2.45% PERMITS AND FEES 5,353.02 10,082.07 10,082.07 200,500.00 190,417.93 5.03% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,834,450.00 2,834,450.00 0.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 37,394.69 43,500.65 43,500.65 1,274,876.00 1,231,375.35 3.41% FINES & FORFEITS 499.44 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 0.00% INTEREST 3,447.99 616.94 616.94 32,000.00 31,383.06 1.93% REIMBURSEMENTS 9,456.02 13,860.35 13,860.35 130,875.00 117,014.65 10.59% TRANSFERS 750.00 0.00 0.00 1,339,700.00 1,339,700.00 0.00% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 145.73 377.25 377.25 1,000.00 622.75 37.73% TOTAL 57,271.89 69,387.26 69,387.26 8,946,209.00 8,876,821.74 0.78% General Govt. 107,974.80 113,711.65 109,243.15 1,509,116.00 1,399,872.85 7.24% Public Safety 191,602.25 313,250.20 214,289.89 2,821,111.00 2,606,821.11 7.60 Streets & Alleys 102,797.40 29,425.56 99,667.25 1,322,513.00 1,222,845.75 7.54% Parks & Recreation 192,435.37 116,402.92 138,549.44 1,842,730.00 1,704,180.56 7.52% Miscellaneous 50,209.37 40,316.58 51,357.18 1,450,739.00 1,399,381.82 3.54% TOTAL 645,219.19 613,106.91 613,106.91 8,946,209.00 8,333,102.09 6.85% a 41 ( A LC, �) w RESOLUTION TO APPROPRIATE/ SELL AT AUCTION UNCLAIMED PROPERTY Resolution No. 11978 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Services has accumulated various unclaimed items. AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70, Subdivision 2, Paragraph C for the appropriation and sale at auction of unclaimed property. AND WHEREAS, the unclaimed property has been in the possession of the police services for more than sixty (60) days; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of unclaimed items identified on "Attachment A! 19 2. That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the appropriation of unclaimed items identified on "Attachment B." Adopted by the City Council this day of February, 2002. Mayor City Administrator L� y(V-�\l • a • Attachment A 01 -2428 Frees irit Men's Red 01 -2533 X Games Boys White 01 -2554 Huffy Stalker Men's 26" Black 01 -2577 Roadmaster Mountain Climber Men's 26" Blue 01 -2651 Quest Glitter Women's 26" 01 -2640 Fila Men's 26" Blue 01 -2640 Astra Men's 26" Orange 01 -2718 Murray Ultra Terrain Women's 26" Teal 01 -2732 Schwinn Voyager Men's Black 01 -2742 Magna Women's BlueNellow 01 -2772 Hiawatha Men's 26" Black 01 -2772 Schwinn Men's 26" Black/Silver 01 -2794 Roadmaster Mountain Climber Men's Black/Blue 01 -2851 Ralie h Men's 26" Green 01 -2872 Murray Mountain Climber Women's 24" 01 -2881 Murray Mountain Climber Women's Purple/Pink 01 -2881 Rock point Men's 26" Blue/Gra 01 -2903 Men's 26" Black/Blue 01 -2901 Huffy Vortex Women's Pink 01 -2947 Magna Glance Men's 26" Black/Blue 01 -2951 Murray Boy's 20" Blue 01 -3001 Diamond Parkway Men's 26" 01 -3025 Hiawatha Coaster Women's 26" Green 01 -3038 Shiman Dagger Men's 26" Black/Blue 01 -3049 Murray Fox Women's Gra 01 -3065 Murray Fox River Men's 26" Gra 01 -3106 Huffy Canyon Men's 10 Speed 01 -3288 Huffy Mohave Gulch Men's 26" Black yihj 1 0 Attachment B 1HU008293 Rubbermaid canvas toolbox containing miscellaneous tools 0 0 �AL6� 1 RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY Resolution No. 11879 WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Police Services has accumulated surplus property. AND WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides pursuant to Section 2.70, Subdivision 3, Paragraph C for the sale at auction of surplus property. AND WHEREAS, the police department has determined that it is in possession of surplus property; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That the Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of surplus items identified on Attachment A. • Adopted by the City Council this day of February, 2002. Mayor City Administrator 40 yL)6 a Attachment A Page 1 Garage Door 4 Office Chairs Metal Cabinets LI 0 LA Lb) a Memorandum TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Brenda K. Ewin *rector of Human Resources RE: Flexible Benefit Plan Documents DATE: February 21, 2002 Attached are the proposed amendments to the City of Hutchinson Flexible Plan Documents. The amended documents incorporate the previous plan amendments and those related to the IRS's final regulations regarding mid -year election changes allowed under the flexible benefit plan. It is requested that you consider these documents and Resolution No. 11880 for adoption at the February 26, 2002, meeting of the City Council. Enc. 0 y �b3 • RESOLUTION NO. 11880 RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN, CITY OF HUTCHINSON HEALTH CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN, AND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DEPENDENT CARE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson desires to offer their employees a flexible benefit program providing for reimbursement of medical and dependent care expenses, and payment of employees' insurance premiums, and a plan entitled the City of Hutchinson Flexible Benefit Plan has been prepared and submitted to the City Council with a recommendation for adoption; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hutchinson amends its current Plans entitled City of Hutchinson Flexible Benefit Plan, City of Hutchinson Health Care Reimbursement Plan and City of Hutchinson Dependent Care Reimbursement Plan which were originally effective January 1, 1991, replacing them by adopting in whole the City of Hutchinson Flexible Benefit Plan bearing an effective date of January 1, 2002, and directs management to implement the Plan in accordance with its terms. Adopted by the Council this 26 Day of February, 2002. 0 Marlin Torgerson, Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator L-J IUbj3 RESOLUTION NO. 11881 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE REQUESTED BY DAVID TIFFT, OWNER OF PROPERTY AT 705 CHURCH STREET S.W. IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM 25 FEET TO 24 FEET FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 28 X 32 FOOT DETACHED GARAGE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. David Tifft, property owner, has made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 8.05 to construct a new garage (28'x32') 24 feet from the corner side property line with the following legal description: Lot 8, Peterson's Subdivision 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. • 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions: Removal of services would be at owner's expense; 2. A home occupation is not allowed in the accessory building; 3. Tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 4. Access off Miller Avenue must be at least 20 feet from the intersection; 5. The garage must not exceed 16' in height. Adopted by the City Council this 26' day of February, 2002. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 1 1 LQ-) Hutchinson City Center • DATE: February 20, 2002 HI Hassan Street SE Hutchiman, MN 553547522 324587.5151N= 324234 -4240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: DAVID TIFFT, OWNER OF PROPERTY AT 705 CHURCH STREET S.W. IS REQUESTING A VARIANCE FROM 25 FEET TO 24 FEET FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 28 X 32 FOOT DETACHED GARAGE Pursuant to Sections 6.04 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On January 11, 2002, David TiM submitted a variance application to reduce front yard setback to 24 feet from 25 feet for construction of a 28'x 32' detached garage. FINDINGS OF FACT • 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on February 7, 2002. 3. At the public hearing held, no neighbors were present to object nor had staff received any written objections. 4. The applicant is constructing a detached garage on a comer lot and would prefer the building lime up with the present house. 5. The hardship of the lot being unique with two street frontages, requiring more setback area RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission, on February 19, 2002, voted to recommend approval of the variance with the following conditions: 1. Removal of services would be at owner's expense; 2. A home occupation is not allowed in the accessory building; 3. Tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 4. Access off Miller Avenue must be at least 20 feet from the intersection; 5. The garage must not exceed 16' in height. Respectfully submitted, William Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • cc: David Tifri, 705 Church St. SW Printed ce recycled pryer - ' A L C—� CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT • To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Jim Popp, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Jean Ward, John Webster, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Christie Rock, Steve Madson, Dick Nagy, Ken Merrill, Matt Jaunich, Julie Wischnack, AICP and Bonnie Baumetz Date: February 1, 2002 — Meeting Date: Februrary 19, 2002 Applicant: David Tifft, property owner Brief Description The applicant is requesting a 1 foot variance to reduce front yard setback to 24 feet from 25 feet for construction of a 28' x 32' detached garage. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R -2, Multiple Family Residential Property Location: 705 Church St. SW Lot Size: 100.0' X 115.0' • Existing Land Use: Single Family Dwelling with attached garage Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: R -2, Single Family Dwellings, Bethlehem Methodist Church to the North of the property Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential request complies Zoning History: The property was platted before 1988. Applicable Regulations: Chapter 11, Section 6.04 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Church St. SW and Miller Ave. SW Physical Characteristics: Comer Lot Analysis and Recommendation: Property owner will be constructing a detached garage 20 feet east of • current dwelling, to remain in line with existing dwelling the garage would be built 24 feet from Miller Avenue, which would require a 1 foot variance. The property owner will be using the garage for storage/ yts�i Variance Tifft — 705 Church St. SW Planning Commission — February 19, 2002 Page 2 • workshop and would request access from Miller Ave. The garage will be built with similar siding, roof, etc. of existing home. Staff recommends approval of the variance based the hardship of the lot being unique with two street frontages, requiring more setback area. The recommendation would be with the following conditions: 1. Removal of services would be at owner's expense; 2. A home occupation is not allowed in the accessory building. 3. Tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 4. Access off Miller Avenue must be at least 20 feet from the intersection; 5. The garage must not exceed 16' in height. cc: David TiM 705 Church St. SW • • (A Cc-) 1 DH - 28 - 01 FRI 12 :4 FM JE?ISEH 5 GORDON LAW OFF. FAX H0. 320 587 1061 Fjrs1 American n1e PLAT DRAWING Insurance COrnparty (THIS IS NOT SURVEIL 07n8100 s BIL IET FILE NO. oId lo O ^ T INSP. DATE: INSP. BY: 705 CHURCH ST. SW., HIIICHINSON, NN STREET ADDRESS: STREET LOT 8, PETERSON'S SUED; MCLEOD CO. MN LEGA aSSlim: OWN4 J IFFT, .. RITA IC, 100' 0 115' M� 2t� �Ra�OSC d a A.� 8aita e X96 sIF- 53' to t 65' �-- 24,- Single Story 26 1 G�ar V 22 f 2 <— 0 C F. 1 The Company assures the Insured that the above dlegram Indloates the dimensions of the lend and the locations of the easements and Improvements on the land described In the insured Mortgage. as shown by those County records which under the re=dlrtq taws Impart construcfvo notice. This diagram is based on visual and taped Inspection and is charted to approximate location, and therefore Is not a survey of any type. _ .,M,.„..,... (4 41 N� �, RESOLUTION NO. 11882 RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES REQUESTED BY JEFF HAMILTON, PROPERTY OWNER, TO REPLACE A DEMOLISHED STRUCTURE AT 605 BROWN STREET. THE VARIANCES WOULD BE FOR THE FOLLOWING REGULATIONS: REDUCE FRONT ' YARD SETBACK TO 17 FEET AND CORNER SIDE SETBACK TO 18.7 FEET (REQUIRED SETBACK IS 25 FEET) AND REDUCE REQUIRED LOT AREA FOR A TWO FAMILY DWELLING UNIT FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET (5,000 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT) TO 8,500 SQUARE FEET. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION 1. Jeff Hamilton, property owner, 605 Brown St. SW, has made application to the City Council for Variances under Section 8.05 to reconstruct a two family home on existing non - conforming foundation and lot area with the following legal description: 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. Lot Ten (10) in Block Eight (8) in Bonniwell's Second Addition to Hutchinson The City Council hereby approves the variances with the following conditions: i 1. Removal or relocation of services would be at owner's expense; 2. Two - family dwellings require second gas service and second electric meter; 3. The property presently has one water service, if owner wants two services, another line must be provided; 4. Owner is allowed to cap foundation only for protection; 5. Any tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 6. Access off of Brown Street must be at least 20 feet from the intersection. 7. The existing garage openings next to the house (east side) need to be removed or protected to one -hour construction. The wall adjoining the newly constructed house must also be protected by materials approved for one -hour fire resistance as per U.B.C. section 503.4.8. Adopted by the City Council this 26' day of February, 2002. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor �Cc�)a Hutchinson City Center • • is DATE: February 20, 2002 111 Hasmn Street S6 Hutch mon, MN 55350 -2522 320- 587- 515llFu 320 - 2344240 MEMORANDUM TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: JEFF HAMILTON, PROPERTY OWNER, IS REQUESTING VARIANCES TO REPLACE A DEMOLISHED STRUCTURE AT 605 BROWN STREET. THE HOME WOULD BE RECONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF THE EXISTING FOUNDATION. THE VARIANCES WOULD BE FOR THE FOLLOWING REGULATIONS: REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO 17 FEET AND CORNER SIDE SETBACK TO 18.7 FEET (REQUIRED SETBACK IS 25 FEET) AND REDUCE REQUIRED LOT AREA FOR A TWO FAMILY DWELLING UNIT FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET (5,000 SQUARE FEET PER UNIT) TO 8,500 SQUARE FEET. Pursuant to Sections 6.04 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On January 29, 2002, Jeff Hamilton, is requesting variances to replace a demolished structure at 605 Brown Street SW. The home would be reconstructed on top of the existing foundation. The variances would be for the following regulations: reduce front yard setback to 17 feet and corner side setback to 18.7 feet (required setback is 25 feet) and reduce required lot area for a two family dwelling unit from 10,000 square feet (5,000 square feet per unit) to 8,500 square feet. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on February 7, 2002. 3. At the public hearing held, neighbors were present to abject, staff had not received any written objections. 4. The applicant is replacing a two-family house destroyed by fire on a non - conforming foundation and lot area 5. The hardship being the location of the original homestead. 6. The house plans revealed porches extending into the setback area Another variance would be required to place porches into the setback area This request is for the house only. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission, on February 19, 2002, voted to recommend approval of the variance with the following conditions: 1. Removal or relocation of services would be at owner's expense; 2. Two-family dwellings require second gas service and second electric meter; Mn«mrwrdpqw- 4LC-)a Hamilton Variance • 2119102 Page 2 of 2 3. The property presently has one water service, if owner wants two services, another line must be provided; 4. Owner is allowed to cap foundation only for protection; 5. Any tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 6. Access off of Brown Street must be at least 20 feet from the intersection. 7. The existing garage openings next to the house (east side) need to be removed or protected to one -hour construction. The wall adjoining the newly constructed house must also be protected by materials approved for one -hour fire resistance as per U.B.C. section 503.4.8. Respectfully submitted, william Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Jeff Hamilton, 545 Jackson St. Loren Anderson, 18449 -234 Cr. 0 �ALcc a CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT --,_, -, - --- -, /,_, - J To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Jim Popp, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Jean Ward, John Webster, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Christie Rock, Steve Madson, Dick Nagy, Ken Merrill, Matt Jaunich, Julie Wischnack, AICP and Bonnie Baumetz Date: February 1, 2002 — Meeting Date: Februrary 19, 2002 Applicant: Jeff Hamilton, property owner Brief Description The applicant is requesting variances to replace a demolished structure at 605 Brown Street. The home would be reconstructed on top of the existing foundation. The variances would be for the following regulations: reduce front yard setback to 17 feet and corner side setback to 18.7 feet (required setback is 25 feet) and reduce required lot area for a two family dwelling unit from 10,000 sq. ft. (5,000 sq. ft. per unit) to 8,500 sq. ft. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R -2, Multiple Family Residential Property Location: 605 Brown St. SW Lot Size: 66' X 128.5' (Approximately 8,500 sq. ft.) Existing Land Use: Vacant (Two family dwelling destroyed by fire) Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: R -2, Single Family Dwellings Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential request complies Zoning history: The property was platted before 1988. Applicable Regulations: Chapter 11, Section 6.04 and 4.04 SPECIAL INFORMATION • Transportation: Brown St. SW and Milwaukee Ave. SW Physical Characteristics: Corner Lot Analysis and Recommendation: Property owner will demolish the dwelling, which was destroyed by a fire. The property owner will replace the home with 52' X 25' two- family dwelling on top of existing foundation. This will require several yLc� a Variance Hamilton — 605 Brown St. SW Planning Commission — February 19, 2002 • Page 2 variances as follows: reduce 25' front and comer side yard setback to 17' and 187 respectively and reduce lot area from 10,000 sq. ft. to 8,500 sq. ft. (Zoning ordinance requires 5,000 sq. ft. per dwelling unit for two-family dwellings.) Staff recommends approval of the variances based on the fact that the two family dwelling was a non - conforming use prior to the damage to the structure and the hardship is the location of the original homestead. The recommendation would be with the following conditions. 1. Removal or relocation of services would be at owner's expense; 2. Two-family dwellings require second gas service and second electric meter; 3. The property presently has one water service, if owner wants two services, another line must be provided; 4. Contact Don Nelson at Hutchinson Utilities before demolition begins; 5. Verify foundation with Utilities staff; 6. Owner is allowed to cap foundation only for protection; 7. Any tree replacement or removal will be at owner's expense; 8. Access off of Brown Street must be at least 20 feet from the intersection. • cc: Jeff Hamilton, 545 Jackson St. Loren Anderson, 18449 -234" Cr. is yLOD, CERTIFICATE SURVEY FOR JEFF HAMILTON LOT 10, BLOCK 8, BONNIWELL'S SECOND ADDITION TO HUTCHINSON MILWAUKEE cue E n Y I PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING HUTCHINSON MN AVENUE I ` I ` 16 ny t tl i Y ' i i 1 t E gel' e t 6l t O /O : 6 • Denotes It O Mnetee h I hereby tertlfy 11 Exlsthp Gaspe I Report was prepares t 1 2 eupervlsten and the Lane surveyor undo Minnesota. J f y Rouseh JOB NO. 01254 _ conrreu watt 128.80 f I `k. e 3 Ga - - - Ld LV MO Existing House u ` ` Existing Gauge Foundation 10 e 22 }PROPOSED �T GARAGE r e z 128.60 Al O ' O` tike INA fence m E H,.. 9 I PELLINEN LAND SURVEYING HUTCHINSON MN AVENUE I ` I ` 16 ny t tl i Y ' i i 1 t E gel' e t 6l t O /O : 6 • Denotes It O Mnetee h I hereby tertlfy 11 Exlsthp Gaspe I Report was prepares t 1 2 eupervlsten and the Lane surveyor undo Minnesota. J f y Rouseh JOB NO. 01254 / 'os 6 vo co -r-,, 4 :� , � . ��� /�< «�� «. ..� � \ y . = ., © «.� . _� � u RESOLUTION NO. 11883 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS SUMMERSET SECOND ADDITION LOCATED IN OUTLOT A OF SUMMERSET ADDITION WHEREAS, Arne Eastbrook, developer, has submitted a final plat to be known as Summerset Second Addition of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-wit; Outlot A, Summerset Addition • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That said final plat of Summerset Second Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following conditions: a. Verify street names. Valhalla appears to be an extension of Bradford St. b. Must sign a second subdivider's agreement prior to filing of the plat. c. Prior to grading for second phase, the engineer must provide approval. d. Final plat mylars must be submitted and procedures for recording must be followed. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of February, 2002. 0 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin Torgerson City Administrator Mayor yC�J3 • C Hutchinson City Center Ill 11aaaan street SE Hutchlnso¢, MN 55350-2522 320. 587- 5151/Fm 320. 2344240 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 2002 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT OF Summetset Second Addition Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a final plat. HISTORY Application was made on January 15, 2002 for a final plat to be known as Summerset Second Addition. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required ap lication and plat maps were submitted. 2. The item was d at the February 19, 2002, Planning Commission meeting, at which time there were no parties present objecting to the request • RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat with the resolution of the following items. CONDITIONS 1. Verify street names. Valhalla appears to be an extension of Bradford St 2. Must sign a second subdivider's agreement prior to filing of the plat 3. Prior to grading for second phase, the engineer must provide approval. Respectfully submitted, William Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • Cc: Arne Estebrook, Developer Printed on recycled paper - ytcJ3 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT iir iuiiiuiuiiuiN//// I/ IMJU/. I/ I/ i/ N_ N/IUiiN{yv�VU /JYI /JYI�I /I /J /_u% / FZUO• w_ �/. f/s/NJ /FJ//.'J/nJ /J6I6I.Yf% / /F� uN �IUn To: Hutchinson Planning Commission • Prepared By: Planning Staff: Jim Popp, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Christie Rock, Matt Jaunich, Jean Ward, John Webster, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Dick Nagy, Ken Merrill, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: February 1, 2002 — Meeting Date: February 19, 2002 Applicant: Developer's Resource Company, property owner FINAL PLAT Brief Description: The plat is to be known as Summerset Second Addition consisting of 36 lots located south of Summerset Addition. The request follows the development plan of the area. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R -2 — Multiple Family Residence (1 and 2 family and duplexes) Property Location: Outlot A, Summerset Addition Lot Size: 36 residential lots Existing Land Use: Agricultural Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Residential to the north, east and west and Agricultural to the south Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Residential conforms with comprehensive plan Zoning History: This property was reviewed during the preliminary plat process. Applicable Regulations: Chapter 12, Section 12.20 Final Plat SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Sherwood St. and Denver Ave. Parking: N/A Analysis and • Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the following conditions: y C�J3 Final Plat Summerset Second Addition Planning Commission— February 19, 2002 • Page 2 ]. Verify street names. Valhalla appears to be an extension of Bradford St. 2. Must sign a second subdivider's agreement prior to filing of the plat. 3. Prior to grading for second phase, the engineer must provide approval. Cc: Arne Estebrook, Developer u • CCc)3 J � I lr� I .oa ae -w L -17366 R -I Jp,00 L -80.61 CBRf NSJ?1'76'IP \JR- ISO.OD G- 31 YS'12' \ MSJ99 �y S6T1S617 977767 se Fj Ul 1'. r_ -`) A .IN b�'y1 y{{ 6 saese'3.7Y 60 'i, _ ';0 61.ID 71 JOrt A �`''.'�-T„ `•t Z 7 y T / �. �>e N INSET 8 c T. v m L' " fJfil� L -61.37 SEE SHEET 2 3 60 >a- 670.00 y0351'19 . OF 2 SHEETS INSET A • 07V9ts �} • o' t . 60 R'1S SEE SHEET 2 N61 8 rj a` 2 SNEE75 •7•^e• wf •. t P J ( G' C. 60 �m .N U • p.o693. J6 L-S]L _ 60!3- •3 N r � DENVER `r T yP • "2535 L.JS7. J � �• 06 o (: "g 60 4% 00 7 INSET E •, I ° ° - + ✓ SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS .� • �� g �� 56973'SS�II 671.6! . Q 1 �— 60 1 O L J 7� J r` � Q ? 7 r 5k r �v P. 60 1 ' G . HEAI w MOTE 7M Stull IF../ WUN A. 5LWL RS! I• 1 • t?V A ma. C—fA MM to .ccar•6+91 pkf thr f,, 1, oKb f. b �� I r � ti f Ia Ef tJ.n. I a 56917 A C ". tb f.. k. mMu t Iowa 50 8 — 1 7. 7 ` j p tw 1/2 k ch 111 hdt M .J /` !v. 94" m.rk.t/ flwc �8 f ; va.HAUA sr 8 8 �� �•C I /V� 60 >• 167 ;r • $ 8� INSET D KI F S, -Sf£ SHEET 2� oo ii 2 SHEETS — , -- ` SUT7WV 77431 / 1L70 I n ,nlrnrll •.r7 ,y •r OC SL C. �,. I. r i5 n. �� VVI I v ' •� `S IM ./ O.Wt A. AM�RSET ���� L VICWN APP Swrnt A�4tJ�o� PRAMW 5v" VO ^.AGES • a ! :a SHUVM .L RS FTX.Y W AMMON i � � .— rrrj•a �_ i A � y• ®�rrraa rrrr•rrrr ru rr mr •ewa r�m� ry M � ' � yrrar�rrna arr syr r � rrry. r�r �rr..+o •rr�•r� �' �rr yer r�r�ry•rr��ir arrrq rr rrr •+•aarrrr r r•w •...r rrrrrrr r••rrr• rr•wr orwwraarrtir. •� ryOwr rrr•4rrMy rnVlV +w r. r.rrrr•r rrrr I•r�rr' �.� sr vrrurwrrwfw•rrr�• rr.rr r �vr r ar• wwr a .rr ur ae•r SUMMERSET DEVELOPERS RESOURCE CO. HUTCHWSON, MN PRELIMINA (:R.JLV.1". ALE.;.' SE � T S£ =� i aROLCS 71RD ALLYIKIM '� AGfNTa:l i R—i 0 Memo To: Mayor and City Council From: Melissa Starke, Administrative Secretary Date: 02/20102 Re: Gambling Licenses and Tobacco License In December 2001, the City Council approved the 2002 license renewals for gambling and tobacco licenses, as well as the other annual license renewals (bingo, haulers, pawn shop and taxi cab). In the original memos that were included in the December Council packets, three license applicants were inadvertently not included on the approval list. They have all paid the appropriate fees and • completed the required paperwork in the timeframe that was requested. It was simply an unfortunate oversight that they were not included for final approval by the Council. Please approve the 2002 licenses to the following area businesses: 2002 Gambling License: 1) Elks Lodge 2) Hutch Wrestling Club 2002 Tobacco License: 1) Bruce's 7 West • • Page 1 q La) 0 it G Hutchinson City Center MN 5 7*4 �111 Street Hutchlusou, MN 55350.2522 22 320. 587- 5151/Fm 320.234 -4240 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: School Road SW Street Repairs Letting No. 8/Project No. 01 -21 DATE: February 15, 2002 The City Street Department contracted with Wm. Mueller and Sons to complete repair work on the above referenced project prior to completing a bituminous overlay. Due to extra repairs required on the above project, therewere not enough maintenance funds set aside to cover the expenses. We had already set up State Aid construction funding on the project and could not increase our transfer of State Aid funding without potentially shifting the project into a different category that would result in the loss of future State Aid funds. We therefore revised our funding of the project by requesting additional State Aid funds to cover our engineering costs, which we originally had proposed to include in our Improvement Bonds. This allows us to use the funds proposed for engineering to be utilized for the added repairs. All costs incurred are directly related to the improvement of School Road and comply with all rules and laws. The project work was completed by the low bidder on the improvement project, and totaled less than $50,000. We recommend payment to Wm. Mueller and Sons in the amount of $47,543.68 for work completed. cc: Ken Merrill, Finance Director John Olson, Assistant Public Works Director Quentin Larson, Sr. Engineering Technician Primed on recycled paper - y t--0 L� WM. MUELLER & SONS INC. ROAD CONTRACTORS • WASHED SAND & GRAVEL • LIMESTONE •. REDI -MIX BLACKTOP - BLACKTOP SURFACING JAN 0 8 2001 831 PARK AVE. TO: City of Hutchinson P.O. BOX 247 City of Hutchinson HAMBURG, MN 55339 Fc ^. [' n PHONE 952- 467 -2720 FAX 952 - 467 -3894 RE: Hutchinson School Road NW DATE: January 07, 2002 SAP 133- 117 -11 `\ According to our records, listed below discrepancies regarding additional items on the above referenced project.. 0 39 12" Yellow X Hatch @ $7.00 /each $ 273.00 1 Mobilization @ $200.00 200.00 2832 4° Solid White Poly - paid for 2951 (255.85) 6183 6" Solid White Poly - paid for 5988 633.75 Subtotal $ 898.20 55 Sq. Yds. Sod @ $5.00 275.00 2 Loop Detectors @ $1250.00 2500.00 Subtotal $2,775.00 HANSON 6t VASEK CONSTRUCTION - EXTRAS 41.3 L.F. Curb A Gutter @ $21.50 887.95 61 Sq. Ft. Sidewalk @ $3.00 183.00 90 Sq Ft. Driveway @ $3.60 324.00 Subtotal $ 1,394.95 Bit Patch total Less paid as wear on final $ 66,373.25 (23,897.72) Total $ 47,543.68 Please contact me with any questions. r W Mueller & So�c. Richard Wendlandt, President /Treasurer 2co ( l0');�5 Y�d,`gl - pI �a Le) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 6 `J APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 >Date.Submitted (Must -tae 4 weeks prior to dance date), Name of Appfrcant ", L (I� -�G Address 1 S 6stiCHe%� G At,' Organization Name, °� Z =' J Address .;,` Phgne Lo�twn of t5ance 0o pAA1 51 Dates} ,`End�'f►ni� '' / Air! Has the location been booked Yes No Have you'run.da es n Hutchinson b four .,'. Yes No Elsewheret Yes No Signature of Applicant 0 I:IFORMSTANCEPERMIT 09199 city-AM 79 MEMORANDUM POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO: Chief Madson FROM: Sgt. Dobratz DATE: 02 -08 -02 RE: Transient Merchant License Background QQ As of today's date, I have completed a background investigation 13 ��b�jce Bridger. Mr Bridger has applied with the City of Hutchinson for a Transient Merchant License. • R Memorandum To: Steve Madson, Police Chief From: Melissa Starke, Administrative Secretary Date: 02/05/02 Re: Transient Merchant License Application and Investigation Please review the enclosed transient merchants application for T.A.P. Enterprises, Inc. and return the original documents to me when your investigation is complete. Although T.A.P. Enterprises has held several tool sales within the community, if you have any questions regarding the application, the representative to contact at T.A.P. is 81len Snell, phone number (800) 989 -3295. The tool sale is scheduled for May 25, 2002, at the Recreation Center. 0 `) C _.3' SENT PY: CITY OF HUTCH'NSON; 32C 234 4240; JAN -18 -02 10:09AM; PAGE 2 CM OF H C" MWER I I I HAS:SAM STREET SE • APPLICATION NE1►CHJRS f{ YM 55350 2521 FOR PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS 2" x 2" Picture required NAME PERMANENT TELEPHONE: — PERMANENT ADDRESS: R-E 1, -71t -t q � TEMPORARY LOCAL ADDRESS : QLt - TEMPORARY TELEPHONE ACCESS: a,(n DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER (STATE 1 HEIGH WEIGHT EYE COLOR' NAME and DRIVER'S LICENSE INFORMATION FEES 5 LENGTH OF PERMIT REQUESTED How many days? Months? Or year? 0 LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS; Application Fee of $25 applied towards the following permit fee(s) Solicitors, per day ....... S 25.D0 Solicitors, per year ....... $200.00 Transient Merchants, per day S 25.00 Transient Merchants, per year .... 5200.00 .................. Peddlers, per day ........... ........ ... .. ..... S 25.00 Peddlers, per year ,.- -•• „ -_ $200.00 BACKGROUND STATEMENT HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR VIOLATION OF ANY MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES NO ✓ IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PUNISHMENT OR PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE: u(!�) SENT BY: CITY OF HUTCHINSON; 320 234 4240; JAN -18 -02 10:09AM; PAGE 3/5 DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED: DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY: DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE OF SUPPLY - NAME 8 ADDRESS OF SUPPLIER: PROVIDE TWO (2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR CHARACTER REFERENCES: NAME S ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: NAME & ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: STATE LAST CITY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY: CITY /STATE NAME: cSIL C�� O ryl h/ DATE OF ACTIVITY: FROM TO �Il f�OL 0 . 2. L� Ls� "ENT BY: CITY OF HUTCHINSON; 320 234 4240; JAN-18-02 10:09AM; PAGE 4/5 I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica- tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate. I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance No, 673 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex- ceeding 5500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. S�ignatlrhe of App 11ca 6X Date No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required picture. OFFICE USE POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION: L a -3- yl� SENT BY: CITY OF HUTCHINSON; • 320 234 4240; JAN -18-02 10:10AM; PAGE 5/5 RELEASE OF INF0F21t4IIC:; As an applicant fora Peddiars /Solicitors /Iransiecr Merchants License from the Cic of Hutchinson, Y- -nnesota, I am required to f=ish infor=ation vhi" . t:at acenc a;av use in deter_ining cy zoral, phvsical, mmn =i and financial gtautzca- Lions. In this cennett'_on, I hereb expressly author'_ce release of anv and all in for =scicn vhic:-i you may have concerning me, including .n= or-acion of a con_:'ent'a or privileged nature. I hereby release the agency with which I am seeking application for license, and any organization, company or person furnishing infor — .motion to that agency as e -pressly autborized above, from any liability for da =a_e which may result from furnishing the infor --cion requested. a Applicant's Full Printed Name: Applicant's Address: Applicant's Birth Date: Applicant's Place of Birth: ct_ P TY l C4c4(D r �' (?fiddle) (Last) I -A (Number) (City) (County) (State 6 Zir (Month) (Dav) (Year) (City) (State) Applicant's Social Security No.: Applicant's Driver's License No.: �atec ). �p•pz � - Ap ^,a.csncX Sig. ^._Cure to ��y CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612) 234 -4209 Sheet oft ONTRACTOR: R & R Excavating Letting No. 8 Project No. 01 -21 S.A.P. 133 - 117 -10 805 Hwy 7 West, Hutchinson MN 55350 Project Location: School Road NW DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Additional paint items not included in bid. These items were needed after recommendation against using preformed striping on existinq bituminous. Dated: 01/22/2002 Item No. Spec. Ref. Item Name Unit puantity Unit Price Amount DECREASE ITEMS: 52 2564.603 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW- POLY PREFORMED LIN FT -12.00 $10.00 ($120.00) PAVEMENT MESSAGE (ONLY) POLY 0 2564.602 PREFORMED EACH -1.00 $425.00 ($425.00) 151 1 PAVEMENT MESSAGE (RT ARROW) POLY 2564.602 PREFORMED EACH -1.00 $325.00 ($325.00) 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW. POLY 56 2564.603 PREFORMED LIN FT -1514 $3.20 ($4,844.80) TOTAL DECREASE ITEMS ($5,714,80) INCREASE ITEMS 4" DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE - EPDXY PAINT FT 1725 $1.20 $2,070.00 PAVEMENT MESSATE (LEFT TURN ARROW) - EPDXY PAINT EACH 1 $145.00 $145.00 PAVEMENT MESSAGE(ONLY) -EPDXY PAINT EACH 1 $189.00 $189.00 24" SOLID YELLOW LINE -EPDXY PAINT FT 93 $8.00 $744.00 SUB -TOTAL INCREASE ITEMS $3,148.00 10% PRIME CONTRACTOR ALLOWANCE 10% $314.80 TOTAL INCREASE ITEMS $3,462.80 TOTAL DECREASE ($2,252.00 NET DECREASE -------------------------------" ($2,252.00) In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount o $$ 2 252.00 faddMdeduct . An extension of -0- day shall be allowed for completion. iORIGINAL - = = PREVIOUS THIS - - AMOUNT ADDITICINS /DEDUCTIONS ADDITION DEDUCTION TOTAL - $613;636.75 ($5,141.79) - - $2,252.00) - $606,242:96 APPROVED:. ZQ APPROVED: i ractor Mayor TED: I DATED: PROVED: APPROVED: Director of En 'nee g City Administrator DATED: Z 0 5-Lae DATED: MEMO ID To: City Council Prepared By: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Barry Greive, Building Official Date: February 26, 2002 Re: Plumbing and Mechanical Permit Change The Plumbing and Mechanical Permit is proposed to be changed. There are proposed policy changes for construction water and commercial plumbing fees. Staff has observed that the City should equalize charges for commercial and residential projects. The Building Department is requesting that the City raise the fees for commercial plumbing permits to make them comparable to those paid by the residential contractors. The graph below shows the number of inspections done, and fees collected for some of the larger structures built within the last few years. As indicated the ratio of fees collected to inspections done are much higher for single - family dwellings. The goal is to make both residential and commercial fees comparable. The meter costs are not included in these figures. Meter costs are based on the size of the meter required. Building Fees Inspections Wall- Mart Addition $150 10 3 -M $150 9 (not completed) Target $450 11 Cub Foods $450 11 Citizens Bank $450 8 Menards $450 7 Office Max $450 4 All Residential Plumbing Permits $315 2 on average Also a Mechanical Permit will be required for all commercial jobs as well as residential. As required by the Uniform Mechanical Code. t_1c\ J APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING, HEATING, GAS PIPING, SEWER & WATER CONNECTION PERMIT CITY OF HUTCHINSON I I I HASSAN ST. SE, HUTCHINSON, MN I M I S1 I H I Phone 320 - 2344216 Plumbing Permit No.: _ Lot No.: Building Permit No.: Block No.: Phone: Address: Building Type []"Commercial ❑'Industrial ❑ Residential 'Has submittal to the State Plumbing Code Division been completed _ yes _no. (Required by MHD 4715.3130) NAME OF MASTER PLUMBER WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PLUMBING INSTALLATION LICENSE No.: SECTION 2 - Permit Fees WaterMeter Size (i.e. 3/4" or 1 ") ....................................................................... ..............................$ ------------------ ---------- -- - - - - -- --- ---------------- -- - - - - o - --------------- - - - -- - C - 0 - MMERCIAL PLUMBING VALUATION $ x .011% = .................$ ConstructionWater ($ 100. 00) ............................................................ ..............................$ Plumbing Rough In and Underground Test ($50.00 each or maximum $100.00) .........................$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING Plumbing Rough In, Underground Test and Manometer ($50.00 each or maximum $100.00) .......... $ Water:_ Sewer:_ and/or Gas:_ = $100.00 each or maximum of $ 200. 00 .............................. $ (Check which Connedlons Requested) Gas pressure requirement if other than 7" WC. Total Plumbing Fees $ SECTION 3 - Mechanical Schedule (New residential construction mechanical fee Included with plumbing fee) MECHANICAL ($15.00 Insp. + $15.00 Admin = $30.00) or VALUATION $ X.01% whichever is greater.... $ Gas Fitdnes other ) Stove ( ) Grill ( ) Total Mechanical Fees Dryer ( ) Fumece ( ) Unit Heater ( ) Water heater ( ) Gas Log( ) Fireplace ( ) Efficiency Rating BTU Input_ NAME OF MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING MECHANICAL SYSTEM SECTION 4 —Total Fees Surcharge (Include only if no Building Permit) = $ 0.50 up to $1000 fees — more than $1000 x .0005 ....... $ TOTAL PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL FEES ................................. ............................... OFFICE USE ONLY Date: City I.D. 9 Addition: SECTION 1 - Directory Information Address of Property: Applicant: Address: Owner: Signature of Applicant Date: Call 320 - 234 -4216 for Inspections - same day inspections are to be scheduled between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Inspections called In after 9:00 a.m. will be conducted the following day. MEMO 10 To: City Council Prepared By: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Barry Greive, Building Official Dick Nagy, WTF- Water Systems Supervisor Date: February 26, 2002 Re: Change to Residential Construction Water and Water Meter Policy's The Building Department, in conjunction with the Water Department, is requesting approval to revise the Construction Meter Policy # 2.22 (d)(1). The Departments also request to revise the Water Meters and Water Services Policy # 2.16. There would no longer be construction water for residential structures. The Water Department would issue the permanent meter when the request is made from the plumber on site. The change is a result of problems with the construction meters being used for more than a year on the original $50 charge. The City was losing money on water charges. The Water Meter policy was changed to include requirements for irrigation meters, which were being installed without the Water Department's approval of the location. 0 L\6) HUTCHINSON WATER DEPARTMENT 2.22(d)(1) CONSTRUCTION WATER POLICY . DECEMBER 1995 / UPDATED 1998, 2001 SINGLE / TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE CONSTRUCTION 1. No water meter shall be installed at the property until the structure is fully enclosed, (in freezing temperatures a source of heat must be installed in the structure to prevent freezing). The City's Building Department will inspect the installation at the time of the final plumbing inspection. 2. Water service will not be turned on, until installation of the water meter and associated hardware is complete. 3. The contractor shall provide all plumbing, hoses, fittings, etc. 4. Contractor shall install proper backflow preventors on all connections made on to City potable water supply lines. Reference Minnesota Plumbing Code Section 4715.1900. The City must shut water off if no backflow protection is installed. 5. Contact the Hutchinson Water Department at 234 -4222 regarding any of the above items. ALL OTHER CONSTRUCTION 1. Charge for construction water shall be as follows: $100.00 (collected as part of the water meter fee with the plumbing permit). .2. No water meter shall be installed at the property until the building has had a final inspection by the City Building and Inspections department, unless a large meter must be plumbed in by the contractor, or by prior approval of the Building and Inspections personnel. 3. If water is not available to the property when a request for service is made, connection to the closest fire hydrant will be allowed until water service is put into the property. After that time, it will be expected that the connection will be made to the water service line to the property. It will be at the discretion of the City staff to determine that a hook -up to a fire hydrant will be practical or appropriate. Factors to consider shall be distance, safety, traffic, etc. 4. All plumbing, hoses, fittings, etc., shall be provided by the contractor. 5. Contractor shall install proper backflow preventors on all connections made on to City potable water supply lines. Reference Minnesota Plumbing Code Section 4715.1900. The City must shut water off if no backflow protection is installed. 6. No person, except an authorized municipal employee, shall turn on any water supply at the stop box. 7. Contact the Hutchinson Water Department at 234 -4222 for any of the above items. �J tip) 0 Policy 2.16 CITY OF HUTCHINSON POLICY -CITY SERVICES- WATER METERS AND WATER SERVICES NO. 2.16 (2 Pages) DATE 1988: updated 1995, 2002 SOURCE ADMINISTRATION WATER METER EXCHANGES Some requests are received to exchange water meters at a residence or business due to remodeling, expansion, etc. If the party wishes to switch to a larger meter, the cost shall equal the cost of the new meter minus the cost of the existing meter based on permit fee cost. If a smaller meter is requested, an even exchange will be made. NEW BUILDING -OLD METER If a building is to be constructed where an existing building already stands, the current water meter will be allowed to be used in the new structure at no cost. REPAIRING METERS Repairing or modifying of water meters by anyone other than the City or person authorized by the City will not be allowed. WATER ON - GARBAGE When the water to a property is turned on and the meter is installed, all other costs incurred such as garbage, sewer, etc., will be activated regardless if the property is occupied. CURB STOPS PER METER There shall be one curb stop for every meter or account serving the property. If the property has numerous meters serving it, such as an apartment, townhomes, etc., all meters may be installed in a central meter room with valving to isolate each meter and a key provided to the City for access to the room. SHUT OFF NOTICE In the event that a shut down of the City's water main is needed, the following shall be done: (a) If the shut down is planned in advance, all affected customers shall be notified in person or by phone of the shut down. If nobody is on the premises, a written notice will be left in the door. (b) If an emergency exists and an immediate shut down is required, no notice will be given, but staff will attempt to notify customers who are deemed to be critical. *Shut downs which are expected to last 15 minutes or less will not require notices. *Regardless of length or reason of shut down, City Center staff will be notified. *No planned shut downs will be permitted before 8 a.m. or after 3:30 p.m. unless the scope of the work requires it. E q L) 0 Page 2 - Water Meters and Water Services Policy 2.16 IRRIGATION WATER Water service for the purpose of irrigation shall comply with the following. 1. A separate curb stop is required for all new supply branches, in existing systems the water supply may be tapped off the main, after the meter. 2. The meter and associated hardware must remain clear of the street right of way. 3. The City is not responsible for any sprinkler system heads in the right of way. 4. For all systems being installed the meter must be enclosed inside of a structure. 5. An approved backflow system shall be installed, and the maintenance schedule of such must be followed. 6. All systems must be in compliance to the Minnesota State Plumbing Code, and installed by a licensed plumber. 7. The Owner is fully responsible for the entire irrigation system. C] LA U6 CITY OF HUTCHINSON • To: Hutchinson City Council From: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Date: February 21, 2002 • • Re: Request for out of state travel As per City Council Policy 3.23, I am requesting out of state travel approval to attend the National Conference of the American Planning Association in Chicago, Illinois. As part of my duties as board member for the Minnesota Chapter of the American Planning Association, I have been selected as one of 100 national delegates to participate in the conference debate on major policy positions of the association. Topics such as wetlands, water resources, and smart growth are examples of issues that will be discussed. The conference will be held from April 14 through April 17. (As a side note, transportation to conference is, by bus, as provided by the Minnesota Chapter.) q L;�) SHORT TERM • FEE: City of Hutchinson 525.00 APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE Approved Building Fire Application shall be submitted at Police least _ days prior to the Gambling occasion b y. I. , JPJI) ray LJ 61 AND I,. �1� `/ LRA/n Name of Authorized Officer of Name o Designated Gambling Organization Manager Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game ofgamblingin accordance with the provisions of the City of Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 for the license year ending ' . Signatures: Authorized Officer of Organization Debi t p &t1ed U4mbling Manager of organization A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer • of the organization: � h K 1. True Name: L7�,OYY1 t- Ia (last) (first) (middle) 2. Residence Address: 009(oR 1" pip pr O oE Nl1 }tY���r\cnn ` ` yl-55 (street) (city) (state) (zip) 3. Date of Birth: H zo -SR 4. Place of Birth Ux} a °1r M'h A- (mo /day /year) (city /state) 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No _) If Yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manager of organization: 1. True Name: (last) f t) � —T (middle) 2. Residence Address: �/� FnA/Ill �1 h H l SDI7.Ali S-S35a ( tre t) (city) (state) N z 3. Date of Birth: C oQ D 4. Place of Birth: j • (mo day year) (city /state) q UL-) 6. How long have you been a member of the organization? 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you gambling manager. C. Game Information: 1. Place where gambling devices will be used Q 2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used o _ (dat and/or day(s) 3. Hours of _the � , y gambling devices will be used: of week) From To fI P.M. 4. Maximum number of players 5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? r G- 6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? Yes No X . If so, will a charge be made for such refreshments? Yes NO D. Organization 5. Have you ever been convicted of ny "Li-. crime other than a • traffic offense? Yes No Day and If yes, explain _ 6. How long have you been a member of the organization? 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you gambling manager. C. Game Information: 1. Place where gambling devices will be used Q 2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used o _ (dat and/or day(s) 3. Hours of _the � , y gambling devices will be used: of week) From To fI P.M. 4. Maximum number of players 5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? r G- 6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? Yes No X . If so, will a charge be made for such refreshments? Yes NO D. Organization Information: • 1. Address where regular meetings are held /rn s 2. Day and time of meetings � /5 f�_��d II - ILI .<) 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? Yes No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? 4a. How many members in the organization? 5. What is the purpose of the organization? el?7p 1ge fs 6. Officers of the Organization: 7 • LCCC) Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: Name / Address Title �. Organization Information: (Continued) 8. In whose custody will organization records be ke�t? I N g`/d .Nam Nn�, //I� Address Trin /�;t 9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by players while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed premises, please state the Name of Insurer and Policy No. 10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and regylat � ns governin� the operation and use of gambling devices? E • 11. Atta�h a list of all active members of the organization. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization. 1. Name of bonding company 2. Address of bonding company 3. Amount and duration of bond 4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding requirements. Yea No I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling, and I will familiarize myself with the comments thereof. Signature of officer or organ5azation Date: Z- -?! -O�p_ Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of naturs of Notary Public Commission expires on Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of 19 ..J Si ature of Notary Public ommission expires on (►L-C� • Hutchinson Area Health Care Hutcbinson Community Hospital Burns Manor Nursing Home • Dasel Medical Center ' % - W 1095 Highway 15 South Hutchinson, MN 55350 (320) 234 -5000 February 20, 2002 The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and Members of the City Council Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members: The Board of Directors of Hutchinson Area Health Care (HAHC), as part of their regular meeting on February 19, 2002, considered a request for the purchase of 15 Hill -Rom replacement beds with mattresses and accessories. The following is an excerpt from the minutes of the meeting. E " Hill Rom Beds. The board reviewed a capital expenditure request to purchase 15 Hill -Rom Advanta beds model 1604 standard configuration with mattresses and accessories. The purchase is recommended to address patient's rights and safety issues that are created because of side rail problems with the existing beds. Although there are two qualified manufacturers, it is recommended we remain with Hill -Rom because the bed provides for consistency in use whereby the staff will need to learn the operation of one style of bed vs. two. Our VHA group purchasing arrangement will allow us to acquire the beds directly from the manufacturer at a negotiated price. • Following discussion, Chrissis made a motion, seconded by Houle, to request authority from the City Council to purchase 15 new Hill -Rom beds at a total cost of $80,109.65. All were in favor. Motion carried." Thank you, in advance, for consideration of this request. Duane Hoversten will be able to address questions you may have regarding this item at your meeting on Tuesday. Sincerely, HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Philip G. Graves President /cs • yU) • Dear City Council, I'm Bob Schlueter. My wife and I own a building downtown, and we are involved in the McLeod County 4 -H Shooting Sports Program. After shooting last year. We thought it would be a good idea to fix up a range in the basement of our unfinished building. Before beginning we talked to the Building Department about dividing the basement for safety, dividing the range and the basement with a 2x4 wall with plywood on it. With the other two walls being rock foundation. A couple weeks ago 1 stopped at the Building Department to askthem if any other requirements were needed. They asked about entrance to the building and were concerned about the number of people down there. I told them people would park in the parking lot at the rear of the building and enter through an • outside entrance. The number of people shooting at maximum is 4 people. The Building Department was satisfied with that information. I also stopped at the Police Department to let them know there might be children walking from the parking lot to the back of the building with cased guns. The dispatcher handed me the ordinance, stating "No shooting to city limits." I then talked to Sargent Earlenson and explained my situation. 1 told him that there will always be adult supervision. The guns will always be cased unless shooting and the children will always wear eye protection. They will be shooting from 15 -30 feet. The only guns shot will be air pistol, air rifle and BB gun. This concern was about how long we would be shooting. Which is just in the winter months. The children are ages 9 -19. Regardless of • age, adult supervision is always required as a part of the shooting sports program. Ck0.-) • He also wanted to be sure the guns would always be cased while not shooting. Which we always practice while at a range. I also explained to him that liability is covered through lcrl a -rdsc� *� 4 -H at the start of the year. Sargent F,arir€fson told me "It sounded like a great idea, and I should probably bring my story to the council and ask for permission to shoot in our basement.° He also said after you act on it if you would like a letter of recommendation from the Hutchinson Police Department. They would be in favor of it but he wanted you to act on it First. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, L 0 Bob Schlueter 17 (Aa) City of� 1 "S' Hutchinson City Center • s lll Ir notchl 5 5350-2 522 nson, MN 5750.222 320.587- 5151/F" 320.234 -4240 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works RE: Consideration of Joint Powers Agreement with the State of Minnesota AND Consideration of Entering Into Agreement with Consulting Firm Phase II Environmental Investigation for Old City Dump DATE: February 15, 2002 Attached is a draft of the proposed Joint Powers Agreement noted above that would let the City of Hutchinson be the lead agency for the next step of the environmental review of the Old City Dump site. As noted, all work would be coordinated with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and all expenses for the work would be reviewed and paid by them, under the conditions noted in the Agreement. • Marc Sebora and I have reviewed the document and made some minor modifications. We will have proposals from two consultants for the Council Meeting also. These will be from the consultant doing the Phase 1 Environmental work for the MPCA (STS Consultants) and the consultant working with the City of Hutchinson on the adjacent river bank erosion and other environmental projects (Barr Engineering Company). We will review the two proposals and have a recommendation for award contingent on approval of the Joint Powers Agreement by the State of Minnesota. As previously noted, this work needs to be completed in order to get clearance (partial or complete) to reutilize the old dump site for construction of the Public Safety Training site. Please note that although work could commence on the site prior to completion of this study, there is an ongoing risk related to the potential need to mitigate site conditions by removal of materials or other work that could potentially involve removal of any site improvements. The current schedule calls for the Phase U report to be done by about May 1. Final action by the MPCA would follow the report completion, hopefully by June. The two motions requested: Approve the Joint Powers Agreement with the State of Minnesota for environmental review of the Old City Dump by the City of Hutchinson 2. Approve the consulting contract with STS Consultants or Barr Engineering Company • contingent upon approval of the Joint Powers Agreement by all parties. Hinted on recycled paper - <g L \ CFMS Contract No. DRAFT - 2112102 frCM STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT This agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (State), and the City of Hutchinson (City). Recitals A. Under Minn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. 10, the State and the City are empowered to enter into joint powers agreements. B. Under Minn. Star. § I15B.42, subd. 2 (11), the State is authorized to use money appropriated from the Solid Waste Fund to perform environmental assessments of unpermitted mixed municipal solid waste disposal facilities. C. The City is authorized by law to engage in public works to promote the health and safety of its citizens. D. The State is willing to provide financial assistance to the City for conducting an environmental assessment of the City's historical non - permitted municipal solid waste disposal facilities, known as the Hutchinson Dump (the Dump Site). Agreement 1 Term of Agreement 1.1 Effective date: January 1, 2002, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota • Statutes Section 160.05, subdivision 2, whichever is later. 1.2 Expiration date: June 30, 2002, or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 2 Agreement between the Parties 2.1 Agreement of the City. a. The City agrees to apply to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program for assistance in performing the environmental assessments for the Dump Site. The City agrees to pay the cost of all assistance provided by the VIC program pursuant to the City's VIC application. The City will be reimbursed for these VIC costs according to section 2,2.2,b, of this Agreement. b. The City agrees to conduct a Phase II investigation of the Dump Site in accordance with the VIC Program guidance documents. The City shall obtain VIC Program approval of a work plan for the investigation before commencing the work. c. The City agrees to retain an environmental consulting firm to conduct the phase II investigation for the Dump Site. The City must use a Minnesota Department of Health certified laboratory to analyze the environmental samples taken in the course of the Phase II investigation. d. The City shall provide a summary report of the Phase II investigation to the MPCA. The report should include recommendations for any proposed response actions. • e. The City shall provide detailed invoices of the cost incurred in the investigation to the State's authorized representative. Joint Powers Agreemem (Rev. 12/00) 1 g��) CFMS Contract No. 2.2 Agreement of the State . a. The State, through the VIC Program, agrees to provide for review and approval of the work plan for the investigation, and for review and comment upon the investigation report and recommended response actions. b. The State agrees to review the invoices submitted by the City showing the cost incurred for the investigation, and to pay the City for its approved costs incurred for the investigation as provided in Section 3, including costs of VIC assistance. 3 Payment The total obligation of the State under this agreement will not exceed $60,000. The State will pay the City for its costs incurred for the investigation, up to $60,000, after review and approval of the invoices by the State's authorized representative. The State will not pay any costs unless there is sufficient detail in the invoices to describe the work performed and the invoices have been approved by the State. The payment to the City will be after receipt of report and "review and approval of associated invoices ". 4 Authorized Representatives The State's Authorized Representative is Thomas C. Whear, Project Leader, 520 Lafayette Road North, Saint Paul, MN 55155. Telephone: (651) 296 -7349, Fax: (651) 296 -9707 or his/her successor. The City's Authorized Representative is John P. Rodeberg, P. E., Director of Engineering/Public Works, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350. Telephone: (320) 234 -4208, Fax: (320) 234 -4240 or his /her successor. 5 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete 5.1 Assignment. The City may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this agreement without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this agreement, or their successors in office. 5.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement, or their successors in office. 5.3 Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 5.4 Contract Complete. This agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the City. No other understanding regarding this agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. Liability The City will indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney's fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this agreement by the City or the City's agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the City may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this agreement. 7 State Audits Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the City's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this agreement are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this agreement. 8 Government Data Practices The City and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. ch. 13, as it applies • to all data provided by the State under this agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the City under this agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the City or the State. Joint Powers Agreement (Rev. 12/00) 2 < (La) CFMS Contract No. If the City receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the City must immediately notify the State. is The State will give the City instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. 9 Venue Venue for all legal proceedings out of this agreement, or its breach, must be in the State District Court for Ramsey County, Minnesota. 10 Termination • Signed: Date: CFMS Contract No. A- 2. CITY By: Title: Date: 10.1 Termination. The State or the City may terminate this agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days' written notice to the other party. 10.2 Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services covered here. Termination must be by written or fax notice to the City. The State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of termination. However, the City will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination to the extent that funds are available. The State will not be assessed any penalty if the agreement is terminated because of the decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, to reduce or eliminate any appropriation of funds for the purpose provided herein. The State must provide the City notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that notice. 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies Thal funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05. BY Title: Date: 0 Joint Powers Agreement (Rev. 12/00) 3. STATE AGENCY Distribution: Agency City State's Authoriud Representative - Photo Copy By: (with delegated authority) Title: Date: 3 %cc, 4. COMMLSSIONER OF ADNEINNTRATION delegated m Materials Marragetnent Division By: Date: 5. ATTORNEY GENERAL As to form and execution By: Date: 0 ... FORM A. F. - 4 Notice to Clerk of Meeting of Board of Appeal — "Equalization MIIIer(Oavis Co., St. Paul, MN OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR TO THE CLERK OF THE City OF Hutchi noon COUNTY, MINNESOTA: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the 9th day of May 20.02 Year I at 4 : 30 o'clock�_M., has been fixed as the date for the meeting of the Board of Appeal —'Equalization — istrike Out One) in your City for said year. This meeting should be held in your office as provided by law. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 274.03, you are required to give notice of said meeting by publication and posting, no later than ten days prior to the date of said meeting. Given under my hand this • [.i�cz. Y�•sz. � Hal Kirchoff '....'y ^ °' °" ' McLeod County, Minnesota *Applies only in Cities whose charters provide for a Board of Equalization. Filed in my office this C � day of Year Y /AHN IN G: UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF THIS FORM PROHISHEC- (GENUINE"AWC PRINTED FORMS HAVE A BLUE BCH DEP) g OD) 0 C Hutchinson City Center 111 Hawn street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320.587.5151/F" 320-2344240 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 2002 is TO: City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: Recommendation to approve 2002 Comprehensive Plan The Planning Commission held a public hearing on February 19, 2002, to approve the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. An Open House was held prior to the public hearing for the community to review the maps and document. After a brief presentation by Jay Blake, of Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. and discussion of the Comp Plan and maps, the Planning Commissioners recommended approval unanimously. Printed on recycled paper - (� �C) Hutchinson City Center i s 111 Hassan Sheet SE Hatchhn n, MN 55350 -2522 320 - 587- 5151/Fm 320 - 2344240 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 20, 2002 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 01 -304 AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 11 (ZONING ORDINANCE) ADDING LANGUAGE FOR A NEW ZONING DISTRICT NAMED "GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT" Pursuant to Section 6.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request to amend City Zoning Ordinance adding language for a new zoning district named "Gateway Zoning District' and for the area as defined in the attached map. HISTORY In January, 2002, the Hutchinson Planning Staff presented an amendment to the City Zoning Ordinance #464, adding language for a new zoning district to be named Gateway Zoning District as attached. FINDINGS OF FACT I. All procedural requirements for amendments to the Ordinance have been complied with. 2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, February 7, 2002. The hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at which time there was no one present objecting to the request. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request to amend the Ordinance be approved as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, 60.4 F.P-Zc ' i William Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission N"cw = myaw pp�, - g0) 0 GT Gateway District. Subd. 1. Purpose. The GT, Gateway District regulations are designed and intended to promote commercial development along major thoroughfares which are characterized by high quality permanent construction, strong economic viability, and a pleasing aesthetic appearance. The intent of these regulations is to improve the appearance of the entry points to the city of Hutchinson in order to create a memorable and positive first impression on visitors to the city. The development of high quality commercial construction in the gateway areas of the city will establish the character and quality of the entire community. This ordinance is based upon the 2001/2002 Comprehensive Plan Update. Any building or structure within the Gateway District shall be designed to promote the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties and be architecturally harmonious with the adjacent properties. Subd. 2. Permitted Uses. There are no permitted uses within the GT • District. Subd. 3. Conditional Uses. The following uses are conditionally permitted in the GT, Gateway District. Every use, unless expressly exempt, must follow the review procedures for, and qualify for a conditional use permit. Automobile sales (new and used) Automobile service stations and car washes Banks and savings and loans, including drive -in facilities Boat sales and service (new and used), not including wrecking or dismantling Bowling alleys and billiard parlors Catalog and mail order services Clubs and lodges Community convention centers Convenience stores Dairy product stores Funeral homes • Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 —CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page I of 17 $Lol) • Hotels and motels Meeting halls Motorcycle sales and service, not including wrecking or dismantling Newsstands Pet stores Restaurants and other eating and drinking establishments General Retail Sales Surface parking lots and parking structures or garages in conjunction with a principal use Theaters Tire sales and automotive supply stores Upholstery shops Other commercial uses determined by the Planning Commission to be of the same general character as the conditional uses above, and found not to be detrimental to existing uses and to the general public health, safety, and welfare. Subd.4. Municipal Services Required. Their inclusion in Subd. 3 notwithstanding, the following uses shall not be approved on any lot if municipal sanitary sewer service and municipal water • service are not available to the lot: A. Any use which uses more than 300 gallons of water per day; B. Any use which requires pretreatment to improve the quality of its wastewater prior to disposal in accordance with state or municipal regulations; C. Automobile service stations and car washes; D. Clubs and lodges; E. Convenience stores; F. Hotels and motels; G. Meeting halls; Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 2 of 17 • (�Ed) 0 H. Restaurants and other eating and drinking establishments; I. Theaters. Subd. S. Minimum Lot Area. The minimum lot area in the GT, Gateway District, is ten thousand (10,000) square feet. Subd. 6. Minimum Street Frontage. The minimum street frontage in the GT, Gateway District, is one hundred fifty (150) feet. Subd. 7. Yards and Setbacks. The yard and setback requirements for the GT, Gateway District are measured from the public right -of - way to any improvement on the lot which is impervious to the absorption of surface water, whether used for parking, storage, building construction, or any other impervious surface and are described as follows: • A. Front Yard Setback. There shall be provided a thirty (30) foot front yard setback from all rights of way. Highway 7 shall have a maximum front yard setback of fifty (50) feet. B. Side Yard Setback. There shall be provided a ten (10) foot side yard setback to an impervious parking or storage or other ground level surface and a six (6) foot setback to any portion of a building. On comer lots, the side yard setback along the secondary street frontage shall be twenty (20) feet. C. Rear Yard Setback. There shall be provided a ten (10) foot rear yard setback to an impervious parking or storage or other ground level surface and six (6) feet to any portion of a building. D. Transitional Yard. A transitional yard shall be provided Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 3 of 17 • g(d) anywhere a GT, Gateway District, abuts a Residential District. The site plan shall provide a buffer between the two Districts and shall conform to the following requirements: 1. The dimensions of the required transitional yard on the property located in the GT district shall be equal to the dimensions of the required yard on the residentially zoned property which is located in closest proximity. 2. The transitional yard shall extend the entire length of the abutting Residential District boundary. 3. The transitional yard shall not be required to be more than twenty (20) feet in depth. 4. The transitional yard shall be landscaped. E. Building Placement Buildings shall be built to the front • yard setback line except as noted above. F. Parking Placement Parking areas shall not be place between the building and the primary street (Highway 7). Deviation from this requirement must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Display areas may be in these yards with configuration approval. Subd. 8. Maximum Ground Coverage. The sum total of ground area that may be covered by all structures located on any lot in the GT, Gateway District, shall not exceed seventy-five percent (75 %) of the lot area. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 4 of 17 3(a) • Subd. 9. Building Design and Construction. Standards to promote high quality building materials, traditional facade features, and appropriate design features are imperative for this district. All buildings and structures in the GT, Gateway District, shall meet the following building design and construction standards. A. Exterior Wall Finish. All exterior wall finishes on any building or structure shall be of the following materials, or a combination of the following materials. 1. Face brick. 2. Natural stone. 3. Pre -cast concrete panels or units, the surfaces of which have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture. (No raked or ribbed textures.) 4. Stucco. is 5. Wood, consisting of horizontal lap siding with an exposure no greater than five (5) inches or wood shakes, surfaces must be painted. 6. Any similar material which meets the purposes for which these regulations are designed and intended, as described in Subd. 1, and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. A request for such approval shall include: (a) a written description of the manner in which the proposed material promotes the purposes described in Subdivision 1; (b) a physical sample materials together specifications; of all such proposed with their technical Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 5 of 17 %ca) • (c) a color photograph of similar applications of the proposed material; (d) a sketch of the proposed construction showing the location of the proposed material; (e) a written description explaining why approved materials described in subparagraphs 1 -5 are not being considered. B. Additions and Accessory Buildings. All subsequent additions to a principal building and all accessory buildings and structures shall be constructed of the same materials as the principal building and shall be of the same architectural design and general appearance as the principal building. C. Design Features. For the purpose of carrying out the design and construction standards of the Gateway District, construction should accomplish the following: • 1. Avoid conformity of roof forms and store modules. 2. Treat all sides of a building with facie which is consistent. If the applicant is proposing different facie on sides of building, they must gain approval through the conditional use permit process. 3. Create architectural focal features. 4. Define the edges of the gateway corridors with buildings and landscaping. 5. Link all developments with sidewalks and landscaped boulevards. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 6 of 17 • , W) • Subd. 10. Maximum Building Height The maximum height of any construction element shall be established under the conditional use permit. Subd. 11. Outdoor Storage Prohibited. No owner or occupier of land in the Gateway District shall store or permit the storage of any personal property, including, without limitation, commercial products, equipment (excluding delivery vehicles), junk material, or any other item, unless such personal property is enclosed within a building or concealed within an opaque fence which has been approved by the City as a condition of a conditional use permit. All storage fences shall meet the construction requirements of Subdivision 12J of this section. Subd. 12. Landscaping. A. General Landscaping and Maintenance Requirements. All undeveloped lots and parcels shall be mowed and kept free of accumulation of garbage, trash, refuse, debris, and other unsightly or nuisance creating materials until developed. Except for accessory • uses expressly permitted to be located in required yards, all yards and open spaces between and about structures and off - street parking lots and loading areas shall be landscaped and kept free from accumulations of garbage, trash, refuse, debris, and other unsightly or nuisance creating materials. All landscaping shall be continually maintained by the owner or other person responsible for maintenance of the premises, and all planting areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All lots shall be maintained in accordance with Section 10.31 of the Hutchinson City Code. All planting material shall be of good quality, of species normally grown in Minnesota and capable of withstanding the extremes of individual site microclimates. All specifications for measurement, quality, and installation of trees and shrubs shall be in accordance with the American Standards for Nursery Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 = CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 7of17 r 1 U gCd) • Stock, published by the American Association of Nurserymen. Landscaping and screening required by this Section shall be interrupted only by required access drives and sidewalks. All landscaping and screening required by this Section shall be so designed and maintained as to preserve unobstructed vision of the street and sidewalk at points of access and as not to interfere with, or be damaged by, work within any public or utility easement unless the Planning Department determines that no other location is reasonably feasible. The standards included in this section are intended to promote common landscaping features and materials throughout the GT, Gateway District. B. Applicability. A landscaping plan, and the implementation and maintenance of such plan, shall be required for all uses within this district. Diversion from the standards set forth must be approved at the time of Conditional Use Permit and must be reviewed for • recommendations by the City Forester. C. Landscape Plans. Wherever the submission and approval of a landscape plan is required by this Chapter, the landscape plan and its maintenance shall be a condition of receiving a Certificate of Occupancy. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued prior to City approval of a landscape plan. Failure to implement the approved landscape plan within six (6) months of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy shall be cause for revocation of the Certificate of Occupancy, and other enforcement procedures of this zoning code. 1. Content of Landscape Plan. All landscape plans submitted for approval shall contain or have attached thereto the following information: Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 —CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 8 of 17 • (� 0) • a. The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, parking lots and drives, roadways and right -of -ways, sidewalks, bicycle paths, ground signs, refuse disposal areas, bicycle parking areas, fences, freestanding electrical equipment, tot lots and other recreational facilities, and other freestanding structural features as determined necessary by the Planning Department. b. The location, quantity, size and name, both botanical and common names, of all proposed planting materials. C. The location of existing buildings, structures, and plant materials on adjacent property within one hundred (100) feet of the site. d. Existing and proposed grading of the site, including proposed berming, indicating • contours, at two (2) foot intervals. e. Specification of the type and boundaries of all proposed ground cover. f. Elevations of all fences proposed for location on the site. (The information must also include the design aspects of the fencing.) g. Irrigation plan (if installing). h. Elevations, cross - sections and other details as determined necessary by the Planning Department. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 9 of 17 • ? (a) • 2. Design Criteria. Landscaping plans described above shall be prepared based on the following design criteria. The evaluation and approval of landscape plans shall also be based on these design criteria. a. Scale and Nature of Landscaping Material. The scale and nature of landscaping materials should be appropriate to the size of the structures. Large scaled buildings, for example, should generally be complemented by larger scaled plants. Landscaping of larger areas, such as required yards, should be accomplished by both horizontal landscaping elements, such as planting beds, and vertical landscaping elements, such as trees, berms, and fences. • b. Selection of Plant Material. Plant material should be selected for its form, texture, color, and concern for its ultimate growth. The use of Silver Maples, Box Elders, Russian Olives, Tree of Heaven, Mulberry, Poplars, and other weak wooded species should be avoided. C. Evergreens. Evergreens should be incorporated into the landscape treatment of a site, particularly in those areas screening parking lots from dedicated public right -of -ways or property zoned for residential use. All evergreens shall have a minimum height of six feet. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 —CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 10 of 17 g(d) • d. Shade Trees. All shade trees shall have a minimum trunk size of two (2) inches in diameter upon installation, as measured six (6) inches above the established ground level. e. Softening of Walls and Fences. Plant material should be placed intermittently against long expanses of building walls, fences, and other barriers to create a softening effect. f. Planting Bed. Planting beds should be mulched with bark chips, rock mulch, feather rocks, or similar materials. g. Detention / Retention Basins and Ponds. Detention/ detention basins and ponds shall be landscaped. Such landscaping should include shade and • ornamental trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and /or other planting materials. h. Watering Plant Material. A means of watering plant material should be provided. Installation of an underground irrigation system is recommended. i. Energy Conservation. 1) Deciduous trees should be placed on the south and west sides of buildings and parking lots to provide shade from the summer sun. 2) Evergreens and other similar plant materials should be concentrated on the north side of buildings to Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 11 of 17 • WV a , I • dissipate the effect of winter winds. Preservation of Existing Plant Material. Existing plant material should, wherever practical as determined by the Planning Department, be incorporated into the landscape treatment of a site. k. Berming. Earthen berms, and existing topography should be, whenever determined practical by the Planning Department, incorporated into the landscape treatment of a site, particularly when combined with plant material to facilitate screening from adjacent residential uses. Berms should be designed to allow for maintenance, mowing, and adequate drainage. The elevation and horizontal ground location of the berm should be varied in order to mimic a natural topographical feature. I. Fencing and Walls. Fencing and walls shall conform to the restrictions of this Section. When fencing is used to screen uses, the outside base of the fence and wall shall be landscaped. The fences and /or walls shall incorporate piers built of the same brick, concrete, or stone used in the building facade. D. Transitional Yards. Except as expressly provided elsewhere in this Chapter, every transitional yard shall extend along the entire length of the lot line and shall be designed and maintained to function as a buffer area. Every required transitional yard shall consist of a combination of ground cover, shade trees, evergreen trees and shrubs, and appropriate screening devices such as decorative walls, fences, or berms. Areas not Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 12 of 17 • S Cd) planted with shrubs, trees, or other appropriate screening devices shall be maintained with living ground cover. E. Perimeter Landscaping - Off - Street Parking Lots. Parking lots fronting on principal streets in GT District shall have a fifteen (15) foot setback and a two (2) foot — six (6) inch high landscape buffer. Acceptable materials include: 1. Overstory or ornamental trees spaced at a maximum of twenty -five (25) feet apart with a hedge, railing, or wall in between. Walls and railing piers shall be built out of brick or stone to match the principal building. 2. A berm landscaped with shrubs, ornamental, evergreen and /or overstory trees. F. Interior Landscaping - Off - Street Parking Lots. Every off - street parking lot in the GT District providing twenty -five (25) spaces or more shall provide interior landscaping. Interior landscaping shall consist of planting islands with a minimum area of sixty (60) square feet and a minimum • width of six (6) feet, measured from the back of curb to back of curb. Parking lot interiors shall have 150 square feet of landscape islands per twenty five (25) parking spaces. Area devoted to perimeter landscaping shall not be considered as any part of interior landscaping. Where more than one (1) planting island is provided, such islands shall be appropriately spaced throughout the parking lot. As part of site plan review, interior landscaping may be required for off - street parking lots containing less than twenty -five (25) spaces. G. Off - Street Loading Areas. Every off - street loading area visible from any lot zoned for residential use, shall be screened on all sides visible from such lot or street by an opaque fence, wall, or densely planted evergreen hedge of not less than six (6) feet in height, except as necessary for access. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 13 of 17 • • H. Refuse Containers. All refuse and recyclable material containers, except those containers used by a one - family dwelling in connection with the municipal refuse collection service or those containers used on a temporary basis for a construction or disposal activity, shall be fully enclosed by a gated opaque fence or wall of a sufficient height to completely screen such containers from view by all adjoining properties and all streets. The fence or wall shall have an exterior finish that is similar to the material found on the exterior walls of the main building on the property or other approved material as determined by the Planning Department. No refuse or recyclable material containers shall be located between any front or corner side yard. I. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment Except for roof mounted antennas, all mechanical equipment located on the roof of any building constructed after the effective date of this Chapter and exceeding six (6) feet in height shall be completely screened to the full height of such equipment by a parapet wall or other screening structure constructed of the same or similar materials as the principal building facade. J. Fences. No fence or wall shall be erected, enlarged, expanded, altered, relocated, maintained, or repaired in any yard unless it shall first meet the requirements of this Section. 1. Construction. a. Prohibited Material. No fence or wall shall be constructed of any electrically charged element or barbed wire, when incorporated with a permitted fence or wall. Opaque (100 %), plastic colored and coated chain link fencing will be considered with a conditional use permit and will be evaluated on its location and extent of usage. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 14 of 17 • �W b. Approved Material. All fences shall be constructed of stone, brick, ornamental steel, and /or finished wood. The finished side of the fence, or that side of the fence without exposed supports or posts, shall face the neighboring properties or streets. C. Maintenance. Every fence or wall shall be maintained in a good and safe condition at all times. Every damaged or missing element of any fence or wall shall be repaired or replaced immediately. 2. Height. a. Side and Rear Yards. No fence or wall located in a side or rear yard shall be of a height exceeding ten (10) feet, measured from its top edge to the ground at any point. (Fencing exceeding 6 feet require • building permit plan review.) b. Front Yards. No fence or wall located in a front yard shall be of a height exceeding four (4) feet, measured from its top edge to the ground at any point. 3. Setbacks. a. A fence may be located adjacent to, but may not be located on a property line. b. No fence, wall, hedge, or other screening device shall be permitted to encroach on any public right -of -way. Subd. 13. Signage. This section is intended to provide standards for signage within the GT, Gateway District. The promotion of Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 —CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 15 of 17 r1 LJ W • these standards in the Gateway District will serve as a positive example for the rest of the community to strive toward. A. Permitted Signs. The following signs are permitted in the GT District: 1. Wall or ground signs identifying the name or type of business. 2. Parking signs. 3. The total area of all signs shall not exceed 3 square feet per front foot of building. Lots on intersecting streets or facing two parallel streets shall be permitted one hundred fifty percent (150 %) of the total allowable sign area, with no more than one hundred percent (100 %) on any one street. 4. Maximum height of a ground sign shall not exceed twenty -seven (27) feet. 5. Wall signs shall not project in excess of twelve (12) • inches or above the roof line. 6. Roof signs, excluding advertising signs, not exceeding fifteen (15) feet in height. 7. Projecting signs, provided that there shall be not more than one (1) such sign, shall project not more than six (6) feet from the face of the building, and shall have a minimum underside clearance of at least fourteen (14) feet. 8. No more than four (4) signs shall be permitted, not more than two (2) being ground signs. 9. Ground signs shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from lot lines. Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 —CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 16 of 17 • <� (d) 10. Monument signs subject to the following requirements: • a. Single or double occupancy business signs shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the total front building facade except that both front and side facades may be counted on a comer lot. Sign area may not exceed one hundred (100) square feet with a maximum height of twenty (20) feet. Monument signs may not exceed more than ten (10) feet high. b. Monument signs for mufti- tenant businesses may not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet. with a maximum height of thirty (30) feet. C. Monument signs may not exceed more than twenty (20) feet. d. One monument sign per single and double occupancy building is allowed. e. One monument sign per street frontage is • allowed for multi- tenant buildings. f. Special landscaping features that integrate with monument signs is required. B. Prohibited Signs. This section prohibits signs which have been identified as unattractive and unnecessary. The following signs are prohibited in the GT District: 1. Off - premises signs. 2. Portable signs. 3. Pylon signs. 4. Billboards Draft of gateway District Ordinance February 21, 2002 — CC Meeting February 26, 2002 Page 17 of 17 m E C Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchlo n, MN 55350 -2522 320 - 587- 5151/Fn 320- 2344240 MEMO • rJ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Dolf Moon, Director PRCE DATE: 2/21/02 RE: Change Order Request #3 I would recommend approval of change order request #3. I will be in attendance at the next council meeting to answer any questions you may have. rnn ea m„ y cled paper - S CE) 02/2 0/02 15:35 FAb - Ill�LD • TO: Dolf Moon, Director PRCE room: John McNamara DATE! February 20, 2002 COraY rte: 01083 SUBJECT, Hutchinson Event Center • • 1®002/002 W01D ARCHITFCTV AND ENGINEERS 305 ST- P6TF. S'rNFei ST, PAUL, MN 551U2 651.227.7773 FAX G51.223.5646 25 SuvTn GRovE AYINIIF 5 Dieu 500 ELam TT. 6 01 (F R 47.608.'_'600 rAx 947,6oa.2654 aww.wOLDAE GOBI NA1tgV(3LQAE.GQM The following are recommended contract changes for the Even Center. We have concluded our review of the pricing submitted and have received revised pricing from the contractor where applicable, The approved costs represent a fair value for the work performed. Also attached is the back -up information from the contractor and updated budget summary for your use. Upon approval by City Council, we will issue Change Order #3 for the project Item Des i gam PR #4, Item 2 The Seniors requested that the finishes in the hallway of their area match the main area One additional room was carpeted. PR #4, Item 3 Pricing was requested to add sheet rock to the south wall of the lobby. This area was not sheet rocked for cost savings prior to bidding. PR 45, Item 1 An existing steel column was discovered concealed in the existing wall- The doors were modified and a new aluminum entrance was priced at the lobby to accommodate this column - PR #6, Item 2 Replace existing outlets in kitchen and add three additional outlets. Aooroved Cost $6,002 $1,113 $4,699 $747 Misc. Cost #2 A gate valve was added to the sprinkler main to $1,681 allow the building to be zoned separate from the remaining complex - Misc. Cost #6 A change to the light fixtures was requested upon $430 review of the fixtures. This resulted in a small cost change. Total this Change Order $14,672 There are currently no requests for time extensions related to this work. Including the above recommended changes and costs currently being reviewed, the construction contingency remaining is $111,554 If you have any questions, please call. Enclosure cc: Ken Merrill; City of Hutchinson Jeff Baggenstoss, Shingobee Builders Michael Cox R1W1083/G3b02 <� Le-) c CITY OF HUTCHINSON R55APPYREG LOG20000 AP Payment RagVSler 9999.1015 t 21+3r02 znoroz Check Date Type Check# Vendor Name Amount 2/15102 PK 109038' 102698 DEVRIES, RANDY 607.27 2115102 PK 109039 112201 FIRST FEDERAL FSB 8 BARRETH TR 12,000.00 2115102 PK 109040 112202 GULLICKSON TRAILER SALES 725.OD 2115102 PK 109041 102123 KRISHNAMOORTHI, CHITRA 5018 2115102 PK 109042 102972 MINNESOTA ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASS 20 DO 2/15/02 PK 109043 103093 MINNESOTA SECTION CSWEA 40.00 2115'02 PK 109044 101908 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM 24.213.50 Payment Type Total 37,656.05 Vold Amount Report Totals 37,656.05 IMME DIATE PAYS 0 Sklp In Check Sequence or DupACate Check i Vokl 2!26102 14:45:35 Page - 1 Payment Type Check Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check Payment Check Payment R55APPYREG LOG20000 9999.1015 Check Date Type Ch eck # Vendor 2/21 /02 PK 109045' 102428 2/21/02 PK 109048 101869 2/211G2 PK 109047 102573 2121/02 PK 109048 105888 2/21102 PK 109049 102666 221102 PK 109050 102649 221/02 PK 109051 102745 2121/02 PK 1090 112243 2/21/02 PK 109053 102606 2/21/02 PK 109054 102164 2121102 PK 109055 101874 CITY OF Hl/TCHINSON AP Payment Register 221102 221/02 Nam CON -WAY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE HUTCHINSON, CITY OF MCLEOD COOP POWER MECA MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI MPCA OLD LOG THEATRE ROBINSON, TOBIN SCHMELING OIL CO WEGNER, NEIL GRIGGS 8 COOPER 8 CO Payment Type Total Report Totals 2121/02 16:05:50 Page - 1 Amount Vold Amount Payment Typ 59.71 Check Payment 2,415.50 Check Payment 1,188.16 Check Payment 125.00 Check Payment 195.00 Check Payment 225.00 Check Payment 1,066.75 Check Payment 495.00 Check Payment 7,466.88 Check Payment 508.00 Check Payment 95.57 Check Payment 13,842.57 13,842.57 IMMEDIATE PAYS - Skip in Check Sequence or Duplicate Check V = Void ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS 2/26/02 WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE -USE TAX GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE -FUEL TAX 02/15/02, MEMO TO: CITY STAFF & BANK OFFICIALS 6,466.00 245.00 36,830.00 860.20 • FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: MARCH WIRE TRANSFER The following funds need to be wired - interest payments March 1, 2002 Chase NYC ABA # 021 -000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & Co. c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Dividend Deposit for 3/1 City of Hutchinson, MN Account # 066 - 026776 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 1993 Water Revenue Bond 8,352.50 1992 Recreation Refunding Bond 1,372.50 9,725.00 The following funds need to be wired - PRINCIPAL payments Chase NYC ABA # 021- 000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & Co- c10 THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Redemption Deposit for 3/1 City of Hutchinson, Mn, Account # 066 - 027 -306 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 1992 Recreation Refunding Bond 45,000.00 45,000.00 0 (FAX of bond document must be made at same time for principal payment) I PAYROLL ACCOUNT - PAYROLL OF FEBRUARY 22, 2002 PERIOD ENDING: 02/16/02 FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY - ELECTRONIC TRANSFER TO STATE AND IRS DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE AMOUNT PEID ACCT# NAME DESCRIPTION $17,397.00 9995.2034 WITH. TAX Employee Contribution - Federal Tax ACCOUNT $9,273.12 9995.2040 Employee Contribution - Soc. Security $2,662.84 9995.2242 Employee Contribution - Medicare $29,332.96 Sub -Total - Employee Contribution $9,273.12 9995.2240 $2,662.84 9995.2242 $11,935.96 Sub -Total - Employer Contribution $41,268.92 Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account Employer Contribution - Social Security Employer Contribution - Medicare $7,718.70 9995.2035 MN DEPT OF REVENUE Finance Director Approval R55APPYREG LOG20000 CITY OF MUTCHINSON 9999.1015 AP Payment Register 2r26oz 226102 286102 14A5:52 Pape - 1 Check Dale Type Check # Venda Name Amount Void Arn a t Payment Type Sklp In Check Sequence a Duplkate Check Void 2/26/02 PK 109056' 101676 AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. 740.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109057 102217 ALLIED SERVICES OF HUTCHINSON 603.90 Check Payment 2728102 PK 109058 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 59.90 Check Payment 2!26M2 PK 109059 101863 AMERICAN WELDING SUPPLIES 18.64 Check Payment 212602 PK 109060 112256 AMERICORP INTERNATIONAL INC 256.39 Chace Payment 2126M PK 109061 105460 ANDERSON DECORATING CENTER 31.89 Check Payment 2/26102 PK 109062 107537 APPLEBEE'S 100.00 Check Payment 228/02 PK 109063 111041 ARROW TERMINAL LLC 238.91 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109064 102203 ASOC 92.00 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109065 102444 B T E COMPANY 300.00 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109086 102367 BELLBOY CORP 1,166.58 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109057 105557 BENNETT MATERIAL HANDLING 8,839.50 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109088 102039 BENNETT OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,195.11 Check Payment mow PK 109069 102255 BERKLEY RISK SERVICES 800.00 Check Payment 2726102 PK 109070 101916 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 17325 Check Payment 22602 PK 109071 102752 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP 7,390.00 Check Payment 226102 PK 109072 102407 BRIAN RICK PLUMBING 6 HEATING 107.85 Check Payment 226t02 PK 109073 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 19,302.90 Check Payment Z28/02 PK 109074 102117 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 26.92 Check Payment 22602 PK 109075 112261 CARVER COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFIC 14.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109076 110099 CARVER COUNTY COURT ADMIN 300.00 Check Payment ZF"2 PK 109077 1134391 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 218.69 Check Payment 226702 PK 109078 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 120.50 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109079 110865 CHOICEPOINT SERVICES INC 290.00 Check Payment PK 109080 101927 CHRISTENSEN REPAIR 3.00 Check Payment • 228/02 228102 PK 109081 102247 COLORADO TIME SYSTEMS 85.00 Chack Payment - 226102 PK 109082 102484 CORPORATE EKPRESS 29.55 Check Payment 226102 PK 109083 102892 CROW RIVER ARTS 194.00 Check Payment 226t02 PK 109084 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 8.58 Check Payment 226t02 PK 109085 101864 DAAK REFRIGERATION 34.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 1D9086 108869 DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & UBAN 7,278.82 Check Payment 712602 PK 109087 102838 DAIRYOUEEN 68.31 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109088 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3,669.65 Check Payment 228102 PK 109089 102698 DEVRIES, RANDY 1,014.00 Check Payment 2126/02 PK 109090 104428 DOONER FARMS INC 400.00 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109091 102295 DOOR SERVICE OF ST. CLOUD 140.00 Check Payment 2/28/02 PK 109092 104415 EARTH TECH 2,695.80 Check Payment 22602 PK 109093 102356 ELECTRO WATCHMAN 95.85 Check Payment 212602 PK 109094 112267 EWALD, JOAN 25.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109095 110034 EXTREME BEVERAGE 64.00 Check Payment Z26M PK 109096 102223 FARMRRE EQUIPMENT 1,970.51 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109097 1134137 FASTENAL COMPANY 53.62 Check Payment 22802 PK 109088 102738 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN 159.75 Check Payment 102&02 PK 109089 102030 FORGES AUTO 44.06 Check Payment 2/2602 PK 109100 110633 FROEMMING, HEIDI 25.00 Check Payment 228/02 PK 109101 102526 G & K SERVICES 237.15 Check Payment 2/2&02 PK 109102 102525 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 21.70 Check Payment 272602 PK 109103 102087 GRAINGER PARTS OPERATIONS 92.23 Check Payment 226102 PK 109104 101675 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. 300.00 Check Payment 1026t02 PK 109105 101874 GRIGGS & COOPER & CO 12,434.53 Check Payment Sklp In Check Sequence a Duplkate Check Void CITY OF HUTCHINSON 2)28!02 14:45:52 R55APPYREG LOG20M 9999.1015 AP Payment Register Pepe - 2 2128102 226102 Check Dale Type C heck # Vendor Name A mount Vold Amount Payment Type i 226102 PK 109106 101872 H.R.LAP.R. 255.37 Check Payment 2'26102 PK 109107 102528 HAGER JEWELRY INC. 40.50 Check Payment 212602 PK 109108 102451 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE 346.10 Check Payment 226/02 PK 109109 105493 HEARTLAND TIRE 8 SERVICE 39822 Check Payment 2/18'02 PK 109110 102531 HENRYS FOODS INC 666.43 Check Payment 226102 PK 109111 101915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 163.91 Check Payment 225102 PK 109112 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE/HUTCHINSON 592.77 Check Payment 2'26102 PK 109113 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 531.67 Check Peyrront 226t02 PK 109114 102961 HRA 1,698.66 Check Payment 226'02 PK 109115 102319 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE 210.00 Check Payment 2+28502 PK 109116 108389 HUTCHINSON AUTO CENTER 363.71 Check Payment 2128 PK 109117 102530 HUTCHINSON CO-OP 338.72 Check Payment 2/26 PK 109118 111309 HUTCHINSON HIGH SCHOOL 100.00 Check Payment 2/26102 PK 109119 102537 HUTCHINSON LEADER 47.50 Chalk Payment 2/26'02 PK 109120 102538 HUTCHINSON MEDICAL CENTER 100.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109121 111319 HUTCHINSON MIDDLE SCHOOL 25.00 Check Payment 226 PK 109122 102540 HUTCHINSON PLUMBING 8 HEATING 32.62 Check Payment 2126'02 PK 109123 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO 1249.50 Check Paymerd 221102 PK 109124 102542 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES 1,536.61 Check Payment 226102 PK 109125 105161 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES 28,785.59 Check Payment 226102 PK 109126 102543 HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE 45.09 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109127 101869 HUTCHINSON. CITY OF 1,423.00 Chock Payment 27&02 PK 109128 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 14.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109129 102072 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 24,564.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109130 102633 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 5,357.30 Check Payment 278 PK 109131 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 487.53 Check Par~ 226M PK 109132 102898 HUTCHINSON. CITY OF 21128 Chock Peymant 2128M PK 109133 102771 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 11,06523 Check PaymSaM 22&02 PK 109134 103098 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 731.71 Check Paymara 226102 PK 109135 103079 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMER] 158.64 Chock Payment 226102 PK 109136 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 3297.12 Check Payment 226102 PK 109137 102779 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. #423 4,756.98 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109136 103051 INFRATECH 14,577.00 Chock Payment 226W PK 109139 103520 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 46.81 Check Payment 2128102 PK 109140 102208 JEFPS ELECTRIC 232.78 Check Pa rrom 27&02 PK 109141 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 29.38 Check Pa~ 22&02 PK 109142 101938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 29,235.49 Check Payment 22802 PK 109143 102045 JOHNSON. DOUGLAS 40.19 Check Payment 22502 PK 109144 102346 JOHNSON, LEONARD O. 812.76 Check Payment 2116102 PK 109145 112245 KLIMA, ADELINE 20.00 Chock Payment 226 PK 109146 104413 KRIS ENGINEERING 103.97 Check PaMoM 22&02 PK 109147 102581 L 8 P SUPPLY CO 276.66 Check Payment 228102 PK 109148 101991 LAKES GAS CO. 272.88 Check Payment 220102 PK 109149 104259 LANG'S OLD FASHIONED MEAT MARK 122.00 Check Payrrora 212602 PK 109150 106525 LANO EQUIPMENT OF NORWOOD 65.73 Check Payment 2/1&02 PK 109151 112246 LARSON, VERLYN 10.00 Check Payment 228102 PK 109152 104794 LAUER, CYNDI 15.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109153 101974 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC 5,924.27 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109154 101984 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 27,931.31 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109155 112266 LUND, JUDY 25.00 Check Payment = Skip In Check Sequence cc Duplicate Check V • Void CITY OF HUTCHINSON R5SAPPYREG -0320000 AP Payment Reglsler 9999.1015 228102 228102 226!02 14:45:52 Page - 3 Check Date Type Check k Vendo Nam Ar nt Vold Amount Payment Type Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check = Void 2126= PK 109156 103091 MATHWIG, BARB 50.00 Chic Payment 212602 PK 109157 112248 MCCOY, GAYLA 15.00 Check Payment 2126W PK 109158 101986 MCKAY, KAREN 44.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 109159 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 355.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 109160 101828 MCLEOD COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. 465.50 Check Payment 212602 PK 109161 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 40.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 109162 102158 MCLEOD COUNTY TITLE 90.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 109163 102787 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 600.00 Check Paymem 212602 PK 109164 102787 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 6.00 Chark Payment 212602 PK 109165 102787 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 219.50 Check Payment 212602 PK 109166 109238 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. 105.30 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109167 112263 MCRAITH, BERNIE 3,345.47 Check Payment 2!2602 PK 109158 102084 MCRAITH, JOHN 437.54 Check Payment 212602 PK 109169 102576 MERRILL, KENNETH B. 41.92 Check Payment 212602 PK 109170 103000 MID - MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENT COMM 1,196.35 Check Payment 212602 PK 109171 102425 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. 652.85 Chock Payment 212602 PK 109172 105274 MINN BLUE DIGITAL IMAGING 15.05 Chock Payment 2126!02 PK 109173 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 175.81 Chaco Payment 212602 PK 109174 112260 MINNESOTA GREEN EXPO 357.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 109175 102766 MINNESOTA SHERIFF 35.00 Chock Payment 212602 PK 109176 102570 MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION 390.00 Check Payment 212602 PK 1091 T7 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB 102.50 Check Payment 212602 PK 109178 102655 MODERN MAZDA 42.60 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109179 101985 NAGY, RICHARD 60.00 Check Payment PK 109180 102591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 1.92 Check Payment • 212602 212602 PK 109181 102487 OFFICEMAX 1,215.74 Check Payment - 22602 PK 109182 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 290.91 Check Peynnent 212602 PK 109183 110174 ONDEO NALCO CO 2.484.11 Check Payment 2/2602 PK 109184 102483 OTTO ASSOCIATES 360.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109185 102187 PAUSTIS It SONS WINE CO 1,626.98 Check Payment 212602 PK 109186 101853 PHILLIPS WINE 8 SPIRITS 8,631.48 Check Payment 212602 PK 109187 102373 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 98.61 Check Payment 212602 PK 109188 102167 PITNEY BOWES 126.00 Check Payment 2/2602 PK 109189 112254 PREMIER LIFE PRODUCTS LLC 227.25 Check Payment 2/2602 PK 109190 112264 PRO PRODUCTS LLC 130.80 Check Payment 212602 PK 109191 101877 PRUDENTIAL 75.00 Check Payment 226102 PK 109192 102096 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109193 102615 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 21,260.93 Check Payment 22602 PK 109194 102598 QUADE ELECTRIC 187.68 Check Payment 22602 PK 109195 102052 QUALITY WINE 8 SPIRITS CO. 7,54022 Check Payment 22602 PK 109196 112249 QUAST, GEORGE 8 BUSSLER 8 SON 1,950.92 Check Payment 2!2602 PK 109197 112250 QUAST, GEORGE 8 CROW RIVER GLA 3,300.00 Check Payment 22802 PK 109198 104357 QUINLAN PUBLISHING 89.00 Check Payment 2/2802 PK 109199 104545 QUINN, THERESA 25.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109200 102398 R 8 R EXCAVATING 35,510.53 Check Payment 22802 PK 109201 102398 R 8 R EXCAVATING 26,814.10 Check Payment 228 PK 109202 102604 R 8 R SPECIALTIES INC 165.50 Check Payment 22602 PK 109203 102205 RC. TRANSFER 1,512.03 Check Payment 22602 PK 109204 112265 RADLOFF, SANDY 25.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109205 103879 RASMUSSEN, BRETT 12.00 Check Payment Skip In Check Sequence or Duplicate Check = Void CITY OF HUTCHINSON 226102 14:45:52 R55APPYREG LOG20000 AP Payment Register Pape - 4 9999.1015 zrz6vo2 2rzero2 Check Date Type Chec p Vendor Name Amount Void Amount Payment T ype 2126102 PK 109206 102478 REINER CONTRACTING 8,220.91 Check Payment 226102 PK 109207 112252 RENKES, JULIE 20.00 Check Payment 228102 PK 109208 110350 RIDGEWATER COLLEGE 50.00 Check Payment 228102 PK 109209 104458 RISC 589.20 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109210 104149 RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS 71.69 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109211 102021 RODESERG. JOHN 55.40 Check Payment 2/28/02 PK 109212 102225 RUNNING'S SUPPLY 109.87 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109213 104715 SANDEEN, NANCY 25.00 Check Payment 2![&02 PK 109214 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE 6 TEA 78.00 Check Payment 212(/02 PK 109216 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 2,622.36 Check Payment 2/28!02 PK 109216 104182 SCHMELING, WENDY 10.00 Check Payment Z2W2 PK 109217 112753 SCHUMANN, KIMBERLEY 10.00 Check Payment 2126t02 PK 109218 102211 SCHWEISS DISTRIBUTING 79.88 Check Payment 2128!02 PK 109219 101892 SEH 4,189.98 Check Payment 212&02 PK 109220 102749 SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY BOARD 170.00 Check Payment 22602 PK 109221 102044 SERVOCAL INSTRUMENTS INC 195.00 Check Payment 228702 PK 109222 102637 SEVEN WEST WASH 8 DRY 10.12 Check Payment 228/02 PK 109223 111364 SHINGOBEE BUILDERS INC 103,467.35 Check Payment 228!02 PK 109224 102609 SHOPKO 31.89 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109225 108768 SIGARMS INC 116.50 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109226 103524 SORUE, DEBBIE 45.00 Check Payment 7-1&02 PK 109227 103162 STAMER, BEATRICE 24.00 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109228 102012 STANDARD PRINTING 637.28 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109229 102613 STATE OF MINNESOTA BUILDING CO 93.60 Check Payment 226102 PK 109230 105280 STATE TREASURER 35.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109231 112247 STEELE, DEBBIE 30.00 Check Payment 228702 PK 109232 112262 STEWART ENERGY PRODUCTS 150.00 Check Payment 226102 PK 109233 112261 STORCHHEIM. ROBERT 38.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109234 102018 SWANSON, MARILYN J. 49.68 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109235 102869 TEK MECHANICAL 63.74 Check Payment 2/2602 PK 109236 112255 THIMBLEBERRIES & HUTCH ELEC 15,97023 Check Payment 2Y1&02 PK 109237 104798 THUL, CURT 12.00 Check Payment 2726f02 PK 109238 105540 TONY FORCIER TRUCKING 450.00 Check Payment 226102 PK 109239 105519 TORGERSON, MARLIN 52.56 Check Payment 22802 PK 109240 102620 TRI CO WATER 96.66 Check Paymant 22602 PK 109241 108787 TRI STATE PUMP & CONTROL INC 720.81 Check Payment 226t02 PK 109242 102454 TRI- COUNTY BEVERAGE 8 SUPPLY 102.90 Check Payment 72&02 PK 109243 102126 TRUE VALUE 151.38 Check Payment 2r2&02 PK 109244 102201 UHL CO. 61.10 Check Payment 22602 PK 109245 102427 UNISOURCE 2.684.22 Check Payment 22602 PK 109246 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 54.93 Check Payment N28OZ PK 109247 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 58.94 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109248 102108 VAN BERGEN 6 MARKSON INC 418.79 Check Payment 2/26832 PK 109249 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 297.09 Check Payment 726f02 PK 109250 108598 WAL-MART 26.63 Check Payment 2/26702 PK 109251 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 25.57 Check Payment 22&D2 PK 109252 103397 WEGNER, SARA 24.00 Check Payment 226102 PK 109263 112268 WEISE, CONNIE 25.0) Check Payment 2/2&02 PK 109254 102165 WELCOME NEIGHBOR 60.00 Check Payment 22&02 PK 109255 103452 WINE COMPANY, THE 934.00 Check Payment ' = Skip In Check Sequence a Duplicate Check V = Void CITY OF HUTCHINSON R55APPYREG LOG20000 AP Payment Register 9999.1015 226r02 2128Po2 2r26l02 14:45:52 Page - 5 is Check Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount Vold Amount Payment Type 2!26t02 PK 109256 105208 WOLD ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS 90 -00 Check Payment 2/26102 PK 109257 102076 X -ERGON 235.87 Check Payment 2126t02 PK 109258 105318 XPECT FIRST AID 156.84 Check Payment 2126102 PK 109259 103649 YORK INTERNATIONAL CORP 3,345.21 Check Payment Payment Type Tolel 512,728.18 Report Tolads 512,728.18 9 Skip in Check Sequence or Duplicate Check If = Vold