Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
cp02-24-2004 c
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIi, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER _ 5:30 P.M. 2. INVOCATION -Reverend Greg Nelson, Bethlehem United Methodist 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OP FEBRUARY 10, 2004 Action -Motion to approve as presented 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 18, 2003 2. HUTCHINSONHOUSING&REDEVELOPMENTAUTHORI'I'YREGULARBOARD MEETING MINiTfES FROM JANUARY 20, 2004 3. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR JANUARY 20, 2004 4. WATER/WASTEWATEA FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR JANUARY 2004 5. INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2004 6. GENERAL FUND REPORT FOR 7ANUARY 2004 (h) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 04-365 -CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10.07 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY FENCES (FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR MARCH 9, 2004) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12342 -- RESOLUTION FQR PURCHASE 3. RESOLiJTION NO. 12344 -CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF 2004 FEE SCHEDULES 4. RESOLUTION NO. - 12346 - CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE FACILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 127 FIRST AVENUE SOUTHWEST (c) IQUOR LRICAEN3E FOR APPROVAL OF RENEWAL OF HUTCH BOWL SET-UP (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF HAHC MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM ANALYZER CITY COUNCTT, AGF,NDA -FEBRUARY 24, 2D04 (c) CONSIDERA'1'lON FOR APPROVAL OF HAHC BOARD MEMBER TERMS Action -Motion to approve consent agenda 6. PUBLIC IIEARTNGS - 6:00 P.M. (a) OR.DTNANCE NO. 04-370 - CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAh OF CHANGES TO FIREWORKS ORDINANCE SECTION 10.51 PERMITTED WITHIN THE Cl`1'Y LIMITS (I~7RS.T RF,ADTNG AND SET S'EC'OND READING FOR MARCI! 9, 2004) Action -Motion to reject • Motion to approve 7. COMMUNTCATTONS RF. UF.STS AND PETI'T'IONS 8. UNFINISI3F..D ITUSTNESS 9. NE'VI' BUSINESS (a) RESOLLJTIUN NO. -12345 -CONSIDERATION FOR APPRVAL OF CONDITIONAI. [JSE PERMIT REQUESTED BY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN 1iOMES WiTHOiJT GARAGES LDCATED AT 56U AND 570 HILLTOP DRIVE Action -- Motion to reject -Motion to approvc (h) MARTINEZ CORPO ~ATIpN ROVAL OF AERTAL MAPPING AGREEMENT WITH Action --Motion to reject -Motion to approvc (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANNING/ZONING/BUIT,DING Si1RVEY MODIFICATIONS Action -Motion to reject --Motion to approve (d) CONSIDERAT[ON FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING WATER TREATMENT PLANT WORKSHOP ON APRIL 13, 2004 AT 4:15 P.M. Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (e) CONSIDERATION OF SCHEDULING DF ANN[JAL PERFORMANCE REV[EW OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR GARY PLOTZ Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve ]0. MISCF-.LI.ANEOUS (a) CUMMUNICA'1'IONS 1. FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION ON VISIONARY WORKSHOP no action necessary 11. CLAIMS APPROPRTATTONS AND CONTRACT PAYMEN'T'S 12- AD.IOURN MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:3D P.M. Mayor Mar m yrgerson ca c t e meeting to ordcr. Members present were Jim Haugen, Kay Peterson, Bill Arndt, and Casey Stotts. Others present were Ken Merrill, Finance Director; Marc Sebora, City Attorney; and John Rodeberg, Dircctor of Engineering and Puhlic Works. 2. INVOCATION -Reverend Greg Nclson, Bethlehem United Methodist 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATION BY TIIE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TO RANDY DEVRIES iN RECOGNITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CREEKSIDE SOIL PRESENTATION BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TO JEFF HAAG IN RECOGNITION OF HIS SERVICE ON THE HUTCINSON EDA BOARD 4. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 2004 Minutes were approved as presented 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. HUTCFIINSON UTILITIES FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2003 2. 1~ILTTCHINSON IIOSPITAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2003 3. HUTCFIINSON PUBLIC I.,iBRARY BOARD MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER l 7, 2003 4. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 1, 2003 5. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES FOR 7ANUARY 5, 2004 6. BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JAN[JARY 2004 7. BID OPENWG MINUTES FOR PURCHASE OF FOUR ISUZU NPR CAB/CHASSIS FROM JANUARY 26, 2D04 8. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2004 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES ORDINANCE N0.04-3G7 - CON SIDERATION FOR APPROVAL AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR A PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM Rl TO R2 LOCATED AT 1245 ROBERTS ROAD SOUTHWEST (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12340 -- RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE 3. RESOLUTION NO. 12341-RELEASING PLEDGED SECURITIES FROM BREMER BANK N.A., HUTCHIN50N, MN '~ C~`~ CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- FEBRUARY 10, 2Dp4 (c) THE 3M CLUBIQOR APRRlL240, 20040E SHORT-TEAM GAMBLING LICENSE FOA (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REAPPOINTMENT TO JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD BILL ARNDT (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF APPOINTMENT TO HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTI3 CARE BOARD BERME KNiJTSON (fl VIEW IDETGHTI~ 1XTH ADDIT ON OF SUBI]IVISION AGREEMENT FOR ISLAND Motion by Council Member Peterson, second by Council Member Stotts, to approve consent agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously. 6. PUBI,iC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. 7. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) SURETY BOND, AND CITYPOFOHLITCHIN ON/CITY OF MINNEAPOL 3 ORGANIC MATERIALS CONTRACT Marc Sebora, City Attorney, explained the request for approval of the letter of credit, the surety bond, and the contract. The City of I-Iutchmson competed with other entities in its proposal for providing organic yard waste, leaves, and other organic street sweeping materials removal for the Crty of Minneapolis. The City of Minneapolis will be paying the City of Hutchinson about $3.2 million over the next five years for this service. The City of Minneapolis will be taking this organic waste to a facility m North Minneapolis where the City of Hutchinson Compost Facthty will pick up the organic waste and bring it to the Creekside Facility. Those materials will be tested to ensure they are safe for Creekside's composting process. , Along with the contract, the City of Minneapolis reqquires from all of its contractors a surety bond to ensure performance of contract. The cost ofthat bond is $115,000 to be spread over the next five years. In order to obtain the surety bond the City needed to get a letter of credit, which will be obtained from Wells Fargo. The cost of that is $35,000 over the next ftve years. Approval is requested on these three items so that the City can start fulfilling its obligation to the City of Minneapolis and to obtain the materials needed for the compost site to produce the Creekside Products. Ken Merrill, Finance Director, added that the City will be escrowing $1 million with the bank that will reduce the amount charged per year as long council approves. Counci] Member Amdt asked if the City of Minneapolis would be reqquired to have a bond? Mr. Sebora explained that the contract is currently worded, the City ofMinneapolis does not need to have a bond because we are contracting with them. The City of Minneapolis has taken the position that under their City's obey we are treated the same as any other contractor with the City of Minneapolis. T~e bond is in place to ensure that the City of CITY CDUNCIL MINUTF,S - TE13R UARY 10, 2004 Hutchinson performs the duties required in the contract. If the City of Hutchinson does not perform all the duties, then the City of Minneapolis would need to go elsewhere for those services (the bond is to cover those expenses). Mayor Torgerson asked i f it is a normal procedure for the contract io be signed a year after the City started performing the organic waste removal. Mr. Sebora commented that rt was not necessarily normal but due to circumstances was necessary. In the City's proposal to Minneapolis, the City of I•Iutchinson said that it would take Minneapolis's organic waste starting last year. Once Minneapolis awarded the City with the contract, the City wanted to show in good iazth that it would keep up with the presented proposal. A big time consumer in tlris process was ensuring that the City could get the bond needed at a more reasonable price. The bond needed to he extended over five years, which was unusual (bonds are usually only for about year). The Mayor asked Steve Madson to comment on the organic waste pick-up last year. Mr. Madson stated that the City of Minneapolis was quite happy with the service provided. There were many glitches. The amount of organic waste was about double what the Compost Site was expecting. Even with the glitches, everything went well. Council Member Arndt asked if the Compost Site could handle more tannage if there was a year with significant increase. Mr. Madson explained that the City is being paid by tonnage from Minneapolis and that the Compost Sile could handle the increase. Council Member Peterson asked if there is a minimum amount of yard waste the City of Minneapolis has to pay for and is it an exclusive contract? Mr. Sebora said there is not a provision in the contract For a mimmum about of organic waste but the Cit}~ ofMinneapolis has to give us all their organic waste, the City of Hutchinson is the exclusive contractor. . Motion by Council Member Peterson, second by Council Member Arndt, to approve Wells Fargo Letter of Credit, Surety Bond, and City of Hutchinson/City of Minneapolis Organic Materials Contract. Motion carried unanimously. N) CAPITAL PLAN (200~R2A g)ROVAL OF CITY OF HUTCHINSON F1VE YEAR Ken Merrill, Finance Director, explained the five year capital plan. This five year plan shows all the capital expenses over $] O,U00. This plan shows the department, the priority, and the funding sources of each expense _ This is just a plan, not an approval of those plans. It helps the City plan for the future, looking at what the needs are and how those needs will be funded. John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering and Public Works, state that all the projects all on the plan but not all of the protects will be funded by the city. For example, some of the projects will be funded federally, some will be funded by the state, others from private sources, as well as other sources. Council Member Peterson emphasized that this is Just a plan and each item will still need to be approved by the council individually. Mayor Torgerson further explained that the priorities and dollars of each item may be changed, moved, or removed as needed. Motion by Council Member Haugen, second by Council Member Stotts, to approve City of Hutchinson Five Year Capital Plan (2004 - 2008). Motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT OF AEBAGGING MACHINE Steve Madson updated the council on the information he and Doug Johnson received on the Scarab Leaf Dehagger. After reviewing the unit, it was not what the Compost Site needed. • The machine was too big and offered options that the Compost Site already has. Mr. Madson and Mr. Johnson worked with the Scarab staff to design a scaled down piece machine that would meet the needs of the Compost Site better. The puce of this machine would be about CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY I0, 2004 $92,000. This machine would significantly reduce the cost of managing the Minneapolis organic waste. The machine would also ehmtnate all the plastic bags that are currently a problem at the Compost Site. Mr. Madson and Mr. Johnson asked about financing options with Scazab. The financing options would be to either to lease or purchase the machine. The lease option is $1,800 a month for five years with a $1 buyout option at end of lease. Th e Mayor asked if there was a warranty to ensure the machine performed to expectation and Council Member I3augen asked if, since this is a prototype, will there be a clause to ensure that the company will make modification as needed. Mr. Madson stated that he would work with Mr. Sebora to ensure there was a clause in the contract that included machine maintenance and perforrrtance would be included in the price. Council Member Peterson asked for clarification about whether the City will be leasing yr purchasing the machine. Mr. Merrill stated that the City was currently looking at the financing option but he was not sure if the City would finance through Scarab or find better financing source. Ma or Torgerson asked how longg it would take to get this machine operational. Mr, Madson replied that it would take about 45 days. Motion by Council Member Arndt, second by Council Member Haugen, to approve Procurement of Debagging Machine. Motion earned unanimously. (d) MEETING FOR MAY 3, 004 AT 4 3 Op M ETTING BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Motion by Council Member Peterson, second by Council Member Haugen, to approve Setting Boazd of Equalization Meeting for May 13, 2004 at 4:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ROBERTS PARK FIELD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM DolfMoon, PRCE Director, discussed the recommendation made by the Parks Department to purchase sun shelters for the Roberts Park Facility. The sun shelters will be paid for by the four sponsors that have advertisements on the fences (Citizens Bank, First Federal, McCormick's, and Counriy Kitchen). The Parks Department will collect $6,000 a year for the next five years. Mr. Moon re uested that the council to approve a $20,000 expenditure from the Parks Dedreation Fund for the sun shelters now, Then, as the annual sponsorship funds were received ($3Q,OOD), it would be put back into the Parks Dedication Fund. Mr. Moon also brought pictures and material examples of the sun shelters. There is very little relief from the fun at Roberts Field and these canopies will offer protection from the sun as well as protection to the spectators from the balls. The shelter is 30' X 40'. It will be a hip roof structure. Council Member Arndt asked how wind resistant are the sun shelters? Mr. Moon explained that they are resistant to 80 miles per hour. The shelters aze a screen material so the wind can go through them. That also means that the rain will go through the material as well. The shelter is marnly just shield from the players from the sun. The shelter is not permanent, it will come off in September and be put back in Aprrl but the steel frame chat holds the shelter is permanent. Council Member Peterson commented that she was glad to see the sponsorship again. Motion by Council Member Peterson, second by Council Member Arndt, to approve Roberts Park Field Sponsorship Program. Motion earned unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ADVERTISING FOR SALE OF PROPERTY 4 CITY CUUNCII. MINUTES - FERR VARY 10, 20D4 John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering and Fublic Works, discussed the property. When the City extended School Road from Golf Course Road North tv North High Dnve, the City purchased a piece of property from the county (a triangular parcel). Where that meets Golf Course Road, there are a number o£ remnant parcels. The property to the south east of School Road was given back to the owner who had dedicated the School Road right of way (several acres) as part of the original arrangement with him. In order to get the road at the needed 90 degree angle, the City was left with a triangular area. Cmiginally, the City was going io put a pond there but the pond ultimately had to g0 on the other side ofthe road. The property does have storm sewer and wetlands that go off the end of the road. The City split the property in two in the final plat. The parcel to the north includes a trail connection in that developanent. If it is sold, this property will be unbuildable due to wetlands, trail, storm sewer, etc. There has been some tnterest from the adjoining land owner to have that land as part of his. Which would be a goad since the City would no longer need to maintain that property and there is no value other than easements to run utilities. On the other side there is apiece of parcel that is potentially buildable. There is no sanitary, sewer, or water main service to that property. The City would advertise for bids for both properties with a minimum value. Mr. Rodeberg will work with Marc to set limits regarding butldability. With the one property, the question is how much the buyer should pay for assessments m getting the water back m order to make it a feasible home. The City is still working on that question. The hest thing far the City would be to sell the properties so someone else is maintaining the properties, right now tt is Just a cost to the Crty. Part of the selling price of the north property would be maintaimn the trail and landscaping would be the responsibility of the buyer. Long term replacement of the trail would be the City's responsibility. Once the bids are received, the bids and limitations would need to be reviewed and approved by the council. The City looked at the property for public use but the property is not big enough have a public building. It is too small and in a bad location £or a ppark. Council Member Amdt asked where road access would be for that road and Mr. Rodenberg confirmed it would only be from 13`h Avenue cul-de-sac. Motion by Council Member Petcrson, second by Council Member Stotts, to approve Advertising for Sale of Property. Motion carried unammously. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS 1. FOLLOW-UP ON JANUARY VISIONARY WORKSHOP SESSION Tom Kloss, IT birector, discussed the Visionary Workshop rating spreadsheet. Gary Plotz, City Administrator, added several comments io the spreadsheet. Mr. Klvss discussed the scorin • changes. Council Member Peterson's numbers are now included in the totals. Another c~anpe tv the spreadsheet is the addition ofthe total number ofvoters column. This column will help weigh out the importance of the votes. Mr. Plotz will discuss the rating spreadsheet more at the next meeting 2. COMMUNICATION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER BILL ARNDT Mr. Niesen is going the to event center to bag food for hungry on Wednesday, February 11, 2004 from 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Council Member Arndt recommended that if anyone had time, they could come to the event center to see what Mr. Niesen is doing for the world hungry and help bag food. 3. COMMUNICATION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER KAY PETERSON Ms. Peterson reminded the council and public about the combined HRA $oard and City . Council meeting on February 17, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. CLTY C~UNC7L MINUTES - C EBRUARY 10, 2004 4, CDMMUNiCATION FROM COUNCIL MEMBER CASEY STQTTS (a) Council Member Stotts asked Julie Wischnack, Director of Planning, Zoning, and Building, to discuss the proposed questionnaire on the Planning, Zoning, and Building Department. Ms. Wischnack had several questions for the Council. 1) Should she proceed with the propposed questionnaire and mailing and, if so, is the proposed mailing list acceptable. 2) Would there be a letter from the City Council accompanying the marking. 3 Would the Planning Commission members camprlc the results (khere is a Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, February 17, 2004, where this could be discussed). 4) Finally, what is the expected time frame. Mayor Torgerson asked what would be the cost of the survey? Ms. Wischnack explained that the City would include a self stamped envelope so about $500 for a 700 piece mailing. The mayor recommended following the Excellence Process used a couple ofyears ago to see rf there rs a way the City can better serve the community since the Crly is here to serve the public. Ms. Wischnack commented that the questionnaire is easy to follow and should not take long to complete. The mayor recommended that Ms. Wrschnack proceed with the questionnaire. He also recommended that, if a letter is included, it should come from the Planning Commission. The council makes decisions based mainly on what the opinions and decrsrons of the Planning Commission, they do most of the work surrounding the applications. The queshonnarre should be started soon so the information can be compiled and revrewed before building season starts. Ms. Wischnack added that the mailing list is ready so the questionnaire could go out at anytime but should probably wait until after the planning commission appoints a commrttee. She also recommended only giving two weeks for the questionnarre to be completed and returned to the Planning Commrssron. Ms. Wischnack said there did not need to be a letter if not wanted. Time frame should be soon. Wait to mail until after the planning commission appoints committee. Council Member Haugen asked Ms. Wischnack if there were additional questions she would like on the survey. She commented that it would depend on what the council wanted. There could certainly be a more detailed survey. If the council is just looking for some interaction with people, this is a good survey. Mr. Haugen also requested that the wording on the survey be changed a little (the "if no, why?" to "comment please") so the council can get general feedback both good and bad. Council Member Peterson added that the council could get more involved depending an results of this survey. Council Member Stotts would like to see a typed report given to a Planning Commission subcommittee (consisting of three members) to review and then that subcommittee would report findings to the council. (b) Counci] Member Stotts has contacted about 50% of the restaurant in Hutchinson regarding the smoking issue. Some people would like to see the City take the step forward to stop smokang m eating establishments. Some people want the Crty to continue as it rs now and leave it up to the owner of the restaurant. The comments are all over the board. Some of the restaurant owners have said that they would like to see this done but they do not want to do it on their own because they are afraid that they will lose too much business. Mr. Stotts and Terry Davis, Hutchinson Leader, will be getting opinions from the local restaurant owners and publishing ahem in CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -FEBRUARY 10, 2004 paper. Mr. Stotts will be following up with the restaurants that made changes three years ago and find out the results of those changes. Also, would also like to talk to owners that are thinking about making changes m the future or are going to buy a machine that will help with the smoke. (c) Mr. Stotts was contacted by Steve Cook regarding the consent agenda. Mr. Stotts informed the public that the council agenda is put out the Friday before the council meeting. If anyone has any questions or concerns regarding the consent agenda, they should contact a member of the council. The council member can then pull the rtem for discussion. The mayor added that the City Counci] has an open policy (anyone from the city can address the council) because the City Council believes they are there to provide a service. As far as the consent agenda is concerned, it does come out in advance so anyone can ask the City Council to pull it out for separate action. It would not be appropriate for the public to ask for something to be pulled from the consent agenda dunng the meeting stnce they can get the agenda m advance and talk to a council member about that item. The public can ask for clarification before or after the meeting but it would be very disruptive to do it during the meeting. (d) Council Member Stotts asked Steve Madson to confirm that he wall be at the first council meeting in March to discuss the Compost Facility budget and upcoming milestones. 5. COMMUNICATION FROM FINANCE DIltECTOR KEN MERRILL Mr. Merrill, Finance Director, asked if the council would be available on February 24, 2004 at 4:15 for a workshop regarding new water plant. Council Member Arndt and . Peterson would not be able to make that time. Mr. Merrill will look for new date so everyone can be there. The mayor asked that the City start providing information to the public about the importance of building this new water plant so they can better understand the cost and need. Mr. Rodeberg commented that this one of the reasons for the workshop. Mr. Rodeberg also invited Council Member Stotts and Arndt to come to the Ciiy Center to meet with Staff to get the information about the water plant that was already provided to the other council members. 6. COMMUNICATION FROM MAYOR TORGERSON Mayor read one paragraph from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding the Compltance Monitoring Survey that the State did on Hutchinson's waste water treatment plant. "The City is commended for the efforts to keep its sanitary infrastructure in good working order. Mr. DeVries and his staff are doing an excellent job of operating and maintaining the City's wastewater treatment system. Similarly, the joint efforts of Mr. Rodeberg and WWTP staff to maintain compliance by industrial users with their respective city permits and ordinance are highly commended. The efforts by Ms. Graham is assisting the city of Glenco WWTP laboratory facility to come into compliance also deserve recongnrtion". The mayor commends the staff for their work. 11. CLAIMS APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS Motion by Council Member Peterson, second by Council Member Stotts to approve claims, appropriations, and contract payments. 12. ADJOi7RN With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING February 19, 2004 7:30 p.m. Multipurpose Room in the Willmar Public Library 410 Fifth Street SW RSVP by calling 320-235-6106 A¢enda 6:00 p.m. Finance Committee meeting (Roan 213) 'I:30 p.m. Pioneerland Library Systetn Board meeting Call to order II. Roll call III. Approval of agenda N. Approval of January I5, 2004 minutes (attached) Action V. Presentation by Barbara Carlson, Central MN Foundation Information VI. Committee Reports A. Executive Committee (Hale) 1. Canmirtce appointments (attached) Action B. Finance Committee (Weibcrg) 1. January 2004 financial repot Action 2. Approval of bills and check registers Action 3. Granite Falls request to use reserves to purchase new computers Action 4. Check signatures Action C. Personnel Caunmittce 1. New employees (attached) Action 2. Awards dinner will beheld an Thursday, April 15, 2004, at the Peace Center in Hutchinson, MN (award nominaticm form is attached) Information D. Negotiation Ctmtmittee (Hale) Information E. Labor Management Committee (Clouse) Information F. Policy Committee (Raker) 1. Revised policy on staff representation on board cemmittees (attached) Action 2. Policy on credit cards and charges (attached) Action VII. Old Business VIII. New Business A. Report an legislative day Information IX. Report of Director Information . X. Otltcr XI. Next meeting is'rnursaay, March 18, 2004, 7:30 p.m., multipurpose room in the Willmar Public Library XII. Personnel Committee meets to set meeting date SCa~ ~ rv. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS MINU'T'ES OF THE BDARD MEETING Thursday, Iecember 18, 2D03 at 7:30 P.M. Pursuant to due cal I and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Pioneerland Library System Board called to ceder at 7:30 p.m. by Chair John Baker on Thursday, Dr~cember 18, 2DD3 in the Willmar Public Library Building Multipurpose Room, Willmar, MN. Roll caU was taken and the Chair Baker announced a quorum was present Chair Baker opened the meeting. Chair Baker requested approval of the agenda subject to additions/deletions: Board members requested the following additions: V. Committee Reports: A. Finance Committee: 3) Revised "Amended Automation Budget 2003". Clouse motioned approval of the agenda as presented with amarded additions, seconded 6y Reckdahl. Motion carried. Board member Clouse moved for the approval of the November 20, 2003 minutes, seconded by Weiberg. Motion. carried. Chair Baker moved to committee reports. Finance Committee Chair Weiberg presented for the Finance Committee. Motion by Weiberg to accept the November 2003 Financial Report, secrnrded by Lopez. Motion carried. Weiberg moved to accept the Bills and Check Registers as presented, seconded by G. Johnson. MOtirnr carried. Finance Chav Weiberg explained the revised "Automation Budget for 2D03". A motion was made by Weiberg to approve the amended "Automation Budget for 2003," seconded by Huesing. Motion earned. Chair Baker moved to the Negatlatiap Committee. Chicf/Lead Negotiator Hale held discussion on the December 3, 2003 joint AFSCMTi Union/PLS Negotiating team meeting. Hale had minutes distributed from the meeting that detailed the findings. Hale went. an to provide specifics related to each item in the minutes with questions from the floor and thoughts for finure consideration. Chief Negotiator Hale informed the board that there would be a joint "Labor Management Committee"/"Interest Based $argaining" training session(s) an Thursday, January I5, 2004 at the Bremer Bank Building, Willmar, MN with an alternate day of Wednesday, January 21, 2004. The sessions would be conducted by the State of Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services. Chair John Baker called on the Technology Committee for an update. Chair Huesing updated the board on the "Request for Proposal" for automation services. Thresing informed the board that the formal "RFP" would be available on-line through a-mail (paper if desired, please note 60 pages). The Technology Committee planned to seek formal board authorization at the January 15, 2004 regular meeting. Scheduling for the process would follow: distribute proposals to vendors on January l6, 2004, receive the completed proposals during March 2004 (update board at regular March meeting) and consider awarding the "RFP" by August 20D4. Chair Huesing continued by recommending the need to utilize a consultant from TDS,leanne DeMars for services on the automation "RFP" process. A motion was made by Gislason to authorize a three month contract with Jeanne peMars effective to January 1, 20D4 through March 3l, 2004 with the option of renewing it on a three month basis (estimated annual cost of 57,800 utilizing grant funding, seconded by Reigstad. Motion carried Chair Maas presented for the Nominating Committee. Maas discussed the process and presented the proposed slate of officers for 2004. He went on to state that nominations from the floor would be accepted at the January I5, 2004 regular meeting where the formal election of officers would take place in cnnlpliance with PL5 "$y-Laws". Chair Maas presented the following slate of officers for the 2004 board officer positions: Chair John Baker, Swift County; Vice Chair Garrison Hale, City of Madison; Secretary Stacey Schuette, McLeod County; Treasurer AI Clause, City of Olivia; and Finance Chair Enc Weiberg, City of Willmar. Chao Baker went to Old Business and New Business. Chair john Baker "Recognized" Ramona Berg-Perry of Willmar, MN for her many years of "dedicated service" and "excellence" in serving on the Pioneerland Library Board. He wished her well and stated "she would be missed". Chair Tiaker moved on to the Report of the Director. Dvedor Houlahan and Assistant Director Matson reviewed the renewal of the health insurance providers and informed the board that the employees were able to continue with the original providers; reviewed the "Library Outreach to Latino Workshop" where there were 37 attendees with excellent ratings on the presenters; and they briefed the board on the chart setting forth a compazisvn on "TDS and PLS Database Cleanup Status." +Drrector Houlahan along with Chair Baker wished everyone "Happy Holidays" and thanked the board for their fine work during 2003. Chair Bakes moved to Other Basinesa. A brief discussion took place on the site of the Apri12004 "Annual Meeting". Board members were asked to provide a potential host site at the January 2004 boazd meeting. Chair Baker asked the board if there was any furtlter business. There being Wane, reminded the board that the need meeting would be held Th~asday, January 15, 2004 at 7:311 p.m. in the Willmar public Library Building Multipurpose Ronan, Willmar, MN and moved to adjournment. A motion was made by Hale to AdJourn at 8:12 p.m. seconded by Clouse. Motion carried. Garrison Hale Secretary PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING December 18, 2003 Number oC signatories with appointed representatives: 26 ,Quorum of signatories: 14 Signatories present: 17 Present: Alvin Maas Jack Johnson Jeffrey Lopez Dean Shuck Stacey Schuette Amy Wilde loan Reckdahl Paul Setzepfandt John Baktr Gary Johnson Allen Gislason Neva Kamrath Art Abel Julie Jury Lowell Broberg Pam Dille Garrison Hale Al Clouse Jim Sdtueller Ramona Berg-Perry Mary Huesing .Eric Weiberg Daniel Reigstad Absent: Diane Beck Barb Barth Stacy Grothem• Ivey Vonderharr" Gtant Knutson Herb Rotunda" Dr. Les Potas* Karen Roker Vem Silvernale' Lowell Ueland" Sarah Groves-Speece' Heenan Hannemann• Jack Sandberg James Larson Big Stone County Chippewa County Chippewa County Kandiyohi County McLeod County Meeker County Meeker County Renville County Swift County Yellow Medicine County Yellow Medicine County Canby Graceville Granite Falls Kerkhoven Litchfield Madison plivia Renville Willmar Willmar Willmar Willmar Kandiyohi County Kandiyohi County Kandryohi Cwnty Lac qui Pane County McLeod County Appleton Benson Bird Island Dawson Glencx Hector Hutchinson Hutchinson prtonville LJ s • • p3-Jan Feh-03 Mar-03 03- r -03 Jun-03 3u1-03 p3-Aug p3-Sep 03-OCt Nw-03 Deo-03 MAAS P P E E P P E P P P P P J. JOHNSON E A A E A P E E P A P P LOPEZ E P P P P P P P P P P P SHUCK A P E E P E p q q p E p 9ECK BORTH GROTHEM VONDERHARR SCHUETTE KNUTSON E P P P E E A P P P P P ~ P E P A E E P P P A P E E P P A P E P E E P P A E P P P P A P P E P E E P P E A P A P P P A P E E P P A A A E E P A WILDE RECKDAHL P P E P E P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P SETZEPFANDT E P P A P P P P P P P P BAKER P P P P P P P P P P P P G.3atiNSON P P P P P E P P P P P P GISLASON P P E P E P P P E A E P ROTUNDA P P P P P P E P E E P E POTAS E A E E P A E P P E E E ROKER P f P E A E E E P E E A KAMRATH P P P P P P E P P P P P SILVERNALE P E A P P P P P P P P E UELAND E E P P P P P E P E P E ABEL P A P P E E A E A P P P JURY P P E P E P P P P p p p GROVESSPEECE P P P P P P P E A P P E HANNEMANN E P P P P P P P E P P E SANDBERG P P P E P E E E P P P A 9ROBERG E P P E P A P P P P P P D1LLE P P E P P P P E P P E P HALE P P P P P P P P P E P P CLOUSE P P P P P P P P P E P P CARSON A A A A A A A SCHUELLER P P E E P E P P P E P P BERG-PERRY P P P E P P E P P P P P HUESFNG P P E E P P P P P P E P WEIBERG P E P P P P A E P P P P REiGSTAD P P P P P P P P P P P P Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority Regular Board Meeting -January 20, 2004 Minutes CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ian McDonald called the meeting to order. Members Present: Casey Stotts, Patrick Spethman, Thor Skeie, and Becky Felling. Staff Present: Jean Ward, and Judy Flemming. 2. YEAR END RFPOR'f Jean Ward reviewed the year end report with the board, so the new board members could be introduced to all the programs the HRA administers. Casey Stotts moved to approve the year end report. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. Jean will talk to Sandy, the City Council secretary, to set up a time to meet with the City Council to review the HRA's 2003 Year End Repori. 3. MINUTES OF HRA BOARD MEETING ON DECEMBER 16, 2003 Casey Stotts moved to approve the Minutes as written. Patrick Spethman seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 4. FINANCIAL REPORTS Thor Skeie moved to approve the Financials. Patrick Spethman seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 5. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION #04-01 Becky Felling moved to approve Resolution #04-O1 Authorizing Mileage Reimbursement. Casey Stotts seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 6. PARK'1'OWERS Jean Ward updated the Board on the second allocation of the 2003 Capital Funds from HUD for Park Towers. 7. SCFIOOL CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Judy Flemming reviewed with the Board the Budget for the 2003/2004 project. The soft costs are on track. It is possible that a realtor will not be needed for this home, because there is a couple interested in purchasing the home already. The foundation/flat work, plumbing/HVAC and building material are going to be slightly over the proposed budget, but it will be a wash if a realtor is not needed. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board comparables of the home on Harmony Lane. Patrick Spethman suggested that the Board set a range for the sale price, so Jean won't have to come back to the Board with the presented offers. Pat also suggested that Ian be the Board Representative if an offer is presented out of the range. Casey Stotts moved to set the sale price at $157,000 and allowing negotiations to go down $5,000. Thor Skeie seconded and the motion carried unanimously. • Jean also presented io the Board the proposed home plans for the 2004/2005 school construction program. Six plans were discussed. Another area that needed to be considered was the type of construction financing to use. If the MFIFA's CRV program is used for construction financing, visitability would need to be consider when selecting the house plan. scab a Ian McDonald informed the Board that construction financing offered at the local banks is about a 7% interest rate. Ian McDonald thouglrt that a visitability waiver from MHFA should he asked for first, and if a waiver is not possible then apply for construction financing from a local batlac. With Ian suggestion m mind the Board prioritized the plans as: Split Entry 2.3, One Story l3, Split Level 1.3, Split Level 2.3, Split Entry 1.3, and Split Entry 3.3. Thor Skeic moved to use the prioritized list of floor plans established by the Board and to first try to get a visitability waiver from MI3FA for the split entry floor plan; if the waiver is possible, apply for construction ftnancing from MI-IFA; and if the waiver is not possible, apply for construction financing from a local batilc. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 6. FRANKLIN-GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT [JPDATE Judy Flemming reviewed with the board the memorandum outlining the progress of the project. Ian McDonald reminded the Board of the Recognition Party for Duane Hoversten. 8. ADJpURNMENT There being no other business, Chairman Ian McDonald declared the meeting adjourned. • Recorded by Jean Ward, FIRA Executive Director ~ t. Becky Fc1Mng, MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, January 20, 2004 Hutchinson City Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dean Kirchoff at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Brandon Fraser (5:35), Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson, Mike Flaata, Robert Hantge and Chairman Kirchoff. Absent: Farid Currimbhoy Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Planning Director, Marc Sebora, City Attorney and Bonnie Baumetz, Planning Coordinator 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES a) Consideration of Revised Minutes dated November 18, 2003 and Minutes dated December 16, 2D03. Mr. Haugen moved tc approve the minutes of November 18, 2003 and December 16, 2D03 as submitted. Seconded by Ms. Otteson, the minutes were approved unanimously. . 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CDNSIDERATIDN OF REZONING PROPERTY FROM R1 TO R2 LOCATEl7 AT 1245 ROBERTS ROAD REQUESTED BY RAYMOND NORTON Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:48 p.m. with the reading of publication #7138 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 8, 2004. Ms. Wischnack explained the request and the history of the dwelling and zoning of the lot. She stated no separate water and sewer services were obtained but there are separate gas and electric services to the building. She stated the lot does meet the area requirement for a two family lot. There are no permits on file regarding the remodeling of the house into a duplex. Ms. Wischnack explained the spot zoning regulations and stated staff believes this would be spot zoning and therefore would deny the request. Discussion followed regarding the communicatien between the Utilities and the City when services are being put in. Ms. Wischnack stated the communication is getting better between the two entities. . Raymond Norton, property owner of 1245 Roberts Rd SW, commented on the structure being constructed as a duplex apparently in 1976. He S ~q~ 3 Minutes Planning Commission -January 20, 2003 Page z . explained the access to the downstairs which is from the outside or through the garage. He stated there is not a stairway to the downstairs in the house. Ms. Wischnack stated the Certificate of Occupancy indicates a single family occupancy. Mr. Norton commented on the parking access on Lakewood LN. John Rodeberg stated the parking is entirely on public property and was one time used for the daycare facility. Mr. Norton again stated there does not appear to be evidence of a stairway to the downstairs anywhere in the house. He would like to sell the house and it is not as appealing to sell as single family. Discussion followed on adding an inside stairway. Mr. Norton stated there would be an area in the dining room that could be taken out for a stairway. Robert Vance, 1395 Roberts Rd, stated his concerns with the property being rental and the present buffer of Roberts Rd to the R2 zone. We has concerns with the precedent rezoning the lot would set. He also has parking concerns. • Mr. Norton stated Lakeview LN is also a buffer from Mr. Vance's property. Mr. Fraser commented on the construction of the house without a stairway inside and the fact it has been a rental for many years. It appears to have been built as a duplex. Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The hearing closed at 6:10 p.m. Mr. Fraser made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoing request to R2 with following recommendations: 1. the house must be brought up to Building Code for a duplex and 2. there must be separate addresses given to each unit. Seconded by Mr. Hantge. The motion carried 4 ayes to 2 nays. There was a roll call vote. Ayes were: Mr. Hantge, Ms. Otteson, Mr. Fraser and Mr. Flaata. Nays ware: Mr. Haugen and Chairman Kirchoff. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council regular agenda at their meeting held January 27, 2004 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. b) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY FLOYD SJOSTRAND TO REDUCE PARKING LOT SETBACK LOCATED AT 9D1 HWY 15 SOUTH Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 6:13 p.m. with the reading of publication #7140 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 8, 2004. • Mr. Hantge asked to step down as he is a neighboring property owner. • r1 LJ M Inutes Planning Commission -~ January 20, 20D3 Paga 3 Ms. Wischnack explained this is a fallow-up to a lot split request in November by Dr. Beeler, property owner to the south, to deal with an encroachment issue regarding parking. She commented on the encroachment and the previous denial of the lot split request and building code issues for Dr. Beeler should the lot be split. Ms. Wischnack commented on the work done to the parking lot and whether or not it was enlarged. The property owner has indicated it was a repair. She explained the issue of encroachment was before the repair of the parking lot. She commented on the staff recommendations as follows and the struggle staff had in making the recommendations: 1. The parking lot must be no closer than 3' from the property line at any point, excluding the easement area. (3 foot variance, not 6 feet, as requested) 2. An easement agreement between the property owners must be submitted to the city for the encroachment of 3 parking spaces over the south lot line. (If no easement agreement is received, the parking area must be removed in that location by June 1, 2004.) 3. A double fee for the parking lot permit will applied, since the property owner did not acquire a permit for this construction. Ms. Wischnack stated the number of parking spaces does not meet today's parking requirement. It was discussed that there are utilities on the East side of the lot. Ms. Wischnack stated Mr. Sjostrand's attorney has contacted her and indicated an easement agreement for the parking encroachment is in the works. Mr. Flaata commented on the requirement if future utilities would be necessary in the encroachment it would be at the owners expense- Mr. Rodeberg commented on the fact there has been no drainage review on the property. He stated, from what staff can tell, there is no additional impervious surface added which would not begin a drainage review. Ms. Wischnack read a letter from Dr. Randy Anderson, neighboring property owner, regarding snow removal onto his Ict and damage to his fence. Mrs. Arlene Sjostrand, property owner, explained they purchased the lot in 1981. She commented an the sale of the lot and the fact they were not made aware of the property line encroachment. Mr. Floyd Sjostrand stated they have owned the building for aver 20 years and have made every attempt to be goad neighbors and keep the property maintained. He commented on the snow removal process and stated Mr. Wayne Kenning is his manager and takes care of maintenance. He explained the parking lot encroachment and the problems when Dr. Beeler purchased the property to the South. Mr. Sjostrand stated he regrets the permits were not obtained for the parking lot repair and explained the miscommunication with the contractor and Minutes Planning Commission -January 20, 2003 Page A who was to get the permits. He stated he would like to resolve the problems in the best interest of Dr. Beeler, the City and themselves. Chairman Kirchoff asked if the parking lot was enlarged. Mr. 5jostrand stated it was an overlay of the footprint. He stated parking was there since he owned the property and doesn't know how it happened to encroach into the easement and over the property line. Discussion followed on the snow removal process. Mr. Kenning stated the snow was not put on neighboring property and he is not sure if the fence was damaged by snow removal. Mr. Kenning stated he would like to construct a fence between this lot and the lot to the south as kids jump the retaining wall with their bikes. He stated he has been involved with the property since 1978 and explained the previcus ownership and configuration of the lots. Ms. Otteson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Flaata. The hearing closed at 6:44 p.m. Mr. Flaata made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations adding a fourth recommendation that any utilities needing to be placed in the easement will be at the property owner's expense. Seconded 6y Mr. Fraser, Discussion followed by Ms. Otteson asking if they could add a fifth recommendation regarding the containment of snow on the property and . drainage could not go onto other properties. Mr. Rodeberg stated it is alright to have the snow removal as a condition and that drainage cannot be increased to the neighboring properties. Chairman Kirchoff commented on item #2 and discussion followed regarding the timing of the easement document. It is the consensus of the Commission that the document must be provided to the City before this variance request is placed on the City Council agenda. Ms. Wischnack commented on item #1 and setting a time limit of June 1, 2004 for the removal of the 3 feet of asphalt along the south property line except in the encroachment area. Mr. Flaata amended his moticn to include conditions 4 and 5. Seconded by Mr. Fraser. The motion carried with Mr. Hantge abstaining. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will not be placed on the City Council agenda until the easement encroachment documentation is received by the City. c) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO SECTION 10.07 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING TEMPORARY FENCES Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 6:53 p.m. with the reading of publication #7141 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 8, 2004. Ms. Wischnack commented on the fence ordinance and the adding of temporary fencing to the ordinance in place. This would mean temporary or snow fences would require a permit. She explained the staff had minor • revisions tv the ordinance. Minutes Planning Commission _ January 20, 2003 Page 5 Discussion followed on the definition of temporary fence and what would determine limited period of time. Ms. Wischnack stated public works assisted in locating the snow fence at 4D0 School Rd. 5W to place it off the public right of way. Mr. Rodeberg commented on the issues created by permanent and temporary fences. We do not want to over regulate. He explained even temporary fences would require a call to Gopher State One Call. Orlin Henke, 410 School Rd., stated a number should be put to the limited period of time. Atty. Sebora stated the ordinance as designed will deter the people for taking it dawn. Mr. Henke stated this ordinance doesn't solve anything. He commented on the fact people putting up fences could be liable. Mr. Fraser stated adding language will not solve this problem and he commented that change is appropriate. He stated this ordinance change is a step forward. Discussion followed on the length of time a temporary fence could be up. Ms. Wischnack stated the staff struggled with the period of time and decided not to address it. Mr. Henke stated as he traveled to the Twin Cities he did not see one snow fence in a city along the way. Jeff Juncewski, grandson of property owners at 400 School Rd, St. Cloud real estate agent, stated there are many snow fences in St. Cloud and there is no ordinance regulating the fences. Chairman Kirchoff stated maybe we need to take another stab at it and table to check with other cities. Mr. Fraser stated it is good to include temporary fence requirements. Mr. Hantge stated we should reject the ordinance as it doesn't solve anything. Mr. Hantge made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The hearing closed at 7:15 p.m. Mr. Haugen made a motion to table and directed staff to research other cities. Seconded by Ms. Otteson. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated staff will do further research and come back to the Planning Commission. 4. NEW BUSINESS a) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT SUBMITTED BY MARK SCHIERMAN TO SPLIT A LOT LQCATED AT 1020 GOLF COURSE ROAD NW Ms. Wischnack commented on the request and location of the property. She stated there were a number of issues discussed by staff and Minutes Planning Commission -January 20, 2003 Page 6 explained the development considerations as follows because of the length and width of the lots created: t. The applicant must apply for a variance from the driveway setback requirement of 5 feet, when the owners are ready to proceed. The application must also include a driveway maintenance document and easement. The driveway must allow for fire access turn around space. 2. The water and sewer connections must be designed by an engineer. The lines will be required to be 6 inches for water and $ inches for sewer. The engineer will review the proper location and ensure elevations will service the new homes. The sewer and water lines must also be located within an easement between the two homes. The documents must address maintenance issues. 3. The forester has reviewed the site and believes the driveway location, if placed in the center of the lot, will maintain substantial trees on the site. 4. Fire protection for the homes is a concern. Hydrants are located too far from the new home locations. Sprinkling in the homes or an additional fire hydrant would be possible requirements. Ms. Wischnack then commented on the staff recommendations as follows: The applicant would be required to pay sewer and water access fees and park dedication tees at the time of building. A new home must be built on the northern lot within one year of this approval, or the detached accessory building must be removed. The applicant is required to file all appropriate deeds to reflect the lot division. Mr. Schierman stated two sheds have been removed and the third is on skids and will be removed shortly. Discussion followed on emergency service to the property. Mr. Schierman stated he is not opposed to sprinkling the homes or putting in afire hydrant. Ms. Wischnack explained the possibility of re-subdividing and the need for enough service. Mr. Hantge moved to approve the request for a lot split with staff recommendaticns. Seconded 6y Mr. Flaata. The motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent agenda for the meeting held on January 27, 2004. 5. OLD BUSINE55 Minutes Planning Commission -January 2D, 5003 Page 7 . a) DISCUSSION OF CHANGES TO THE NUISANCE ORDINANCE Ms. Wischnack commented on the recodification of the Ctiy Code. She stated the nuisance ordinance needed some changes in the hearing process and procedure. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to accept the changes for the City Code. b) AGENDA FOR JOINT TOUR pN JANUARY 28, 2004 Ms. Wischnack asked if there should be any changes to the agenda for the tour on January 28'h. Ms. Otteson stated add the snow fences on School Rd. 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF - Ms. Baumefz stated election of officers will be held next meeting. -Ms. Baumetz reported she was invited to the Dassel Planning Commission meeting to present a workshop on Varinaces and Platting procedures. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further the meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m. ~..J lJ s +~ • _ ~Ci of Hutchinson _ __ a reports -Water Sewer Incom __ _ _ ~ 07!31104 I I Prior Prior _ _ _ Annual Current -- -~~-- - ~ _ _ Budget' ! f_N_onth 406 WATER I Year To DaDe' Bu et Rem_afning Percent ~ Used _ Year Budget Year To. Gabe Percent Used 4001 REVENUES - - - --- 4250 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES - ___ 0.00 -- _ -1,650.001 _ -1,650.00 -1,650.00. - 0.0011 -11,OOD.00. -1,000.00 '- 9.09 4450 TOTAL SALES -1,255,000.00 -96,916.34 -96,916.34 -1,35i,916.34~ 732 _ : -1,227,000.00 -86,59235 7.06 462D TOTAL INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 47D0 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENTS _ 4001 REVENUES _ 0.00 0.00 ~ -1,255,OOO.OD _ _ 0.00 0.00 -9B 566.34 _ 0.90 __ 0.00 a.oo~ 0.00: o.oo• o.oa. -98,566.34.-1,456,433.66; 7.65; ~a,000.00 o.oo -1,278,900.00 _ 0.001 DAO ~ ~o.oo~ fl.00 X7,632.35 6.8fi 600i~ EXPENDRURES 6105 TOTAL SALARIES & FRINGE B£NEFi ! _ 318,375.00 ~ 23,O6D.4S, 23,060.46 295,314.54 724% 32fl,52].DD 25,945.54 8.09°~, _ _ 5200 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS 8 MAIN 94,160.00 1,334.39' _ 1,134.39 93,025.fi1 1.20% 92,250.00 _ 3,833.93 4.16% 6300 TOTAL CONSULTING 467,900.00 153.75 153.75 467,746.25 0.03% 219,500.00 169.73 0.06°k 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES 8 CHARGES 216,775.00 15,190.551 15,190.55 201,584.d5 7.0146 ~ 203,800.00 12,550.32 _ 6.16% 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 14,745.00 1,228.75 1,228.75 1 57,145.D0• 8.334'a L i 16,705.00. 1,392.08 8.33°k fi70D TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT _ 57,000.00 6900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 9,900.00 6905 DEPRECATION 235,OOO.OD 6001 EXPENDVTURES 1,413,855.00! NE7 INCOME {LOSS) ~ 0.00 0.00 669.00 869.00 19 583.33 19,583.33 61,220.23 61220.23 37,346.11 37,346.11 57,000.00 0.00°/a 9,031.00. 8.78% ~ 215,416.57 ~ 8.33°k; 11,396,863.52 0.04 55,000.00 27,950A0 220,000.00 1,155,726.00 _ 1 0.00 0.0095 144.00 0.52% 18,333.331 8.33% 62,368.94' _ 25,263.41 i Non inwme statement bud et 7000 TOTAL CAPRAL OUTLAYS 2,268,000.00 400.00 i 400.00 2,267,600.00 __ 0.00 ~ 332,250.00 . 0.00 r L 01f31l04 I Prior Prior _ _ Annual Current Veer To _ Bud Percent Year: Year To; Percent _ _ Budget. Months Date Remaining Used BudgeF Date Used - - 407 WASTEWATER ~, _ 4000 REVENUE 8 EXPENSES 4001 REVENUES _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4250 70TAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES - 9.00 9.00: 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 ~ 0.00 i -4459 TOTAL SALES -2,600,000.00 -229,333.07 -229,333.07-2,829,333.07 6.82, 2,502,DD0.00~ -187,589.70 -7.50% 462{7 TOTAL INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 0.00 -40,900.00 0.00 4700 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ O.DO; 0.00; O.OD 0.00 0.00 4001 REVENUES -2,600,000.00 -229,333.07 -229,333.07 -2,829,333.07 8.82 2,462,000.00 -187,589.70 -1.62% 6901 EXPENOITLIR£S ~ ~ ' 6105 TOTAL SALARIES 8 FRINGE BENEFI l 459,902.00 38,304.381 38,304.38 421,597.62 8.33 493,348.00 39,536.25 6.03% 6200 70TAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS & MAIN 181,759.00 5,777-00 5,777.90! 175,973.00 3.18, 173,500.00 ! 11,387.43 6.56% _ 6300 70TAL CONSULTING 349,000.00 29,166.31 29,166.31 , 319,833.69 8.~ 362,700.00 _ _ _ 6,322.23 2.29% 6306 TOTAL OTHER SERVICES 8 CHARGES 444,940.00 60,77L60 60,771.60 383,268.40 . 13.69 ; 425,220.00 31,757.88 _7.47°.5 6600 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 162,77200 17,436.92 17,436.92 145,335.08 ; 0.90 209,243.00 T3,564.33 6.48°h 6700 TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT 57,000.00: _ 0.00 0.00 57,000.00 0.00 55,000.09 0.00 0.00% 6900 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 74,000.90 73.97 73.97 73,926A3 0.01 23,600.00 -699,250.32 ~ B905 DEPRECATION ~ 7D0,000.00 ~ 60,000.90' 60,000.09 640,000.00 ~ 700,000.90 58,333.33 8.33% 6001 EXPENOLLURES --- 2,428,464.90 211,530.18. 211,530.18 2,216,933.82 2,442,611.00 -536,348.66 -21.96% __ NET INCOME LOSS] 17,802.89 17,802.89 , 612,399.25 723,936.56 .__ i Non income statement bud et 7900 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 2,418,500.00 2,238.64 2,238.64 - 2,416,261.36 0.09 :1,618,900.90 _ , O.DO 0.00 -- j 20-Feb-04 Institution escription nterest Rate CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT January 31,2004 Pate Dale Of Of Purchase Maturity mount US BANK Money Martcat 1.435'° 101312002 1115/2002 388,446.76 Smith Bamey FWLB C 5.005'° 7!18/2002 7!3012008 300.000.00 Smith Bamey FHLB C 4.00% 9!272002 10/10/2007 270,000.00 partial call place in money market a!c 30,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.375°h 9/19/2001 4111/2005 750,000.00 Smith Barney FWLB C 4.180% 8/25/2001 4I19/2W5 270,000.00 Prudential pool 338914 7.226% 12 31 98 02 01 2028 11,882.40 Expected life 8.2 years Smith Barney FHLM-C 4.650% 11/21!2001 5/21/2007 30q,375.00 Prudentail pool 336399 7.270% 12 31 96 02 01 2026 10,331.27 Expected life 4.1 years Prudential Money Market varies 1/2/2002 Open 51,887.00 Prudential FHLB 3.0%step 7!16/2003 7!1612013 200,000.00 Prudential FHLB 5.00°.6 5/2212003 5/22/2013 300,000.00 Prudential FHLB 4.00% 6!12!2003 8!1212013 300,000.00 Prudential FHLB 1.1905'° 6!2612003 08126/13 400,000.00 Wachovla FHLB 3.000°h 12/29/2003 12/29/2008 125,000.00 step up Wachovia FHLB 3.0005'° 11/20!2003 11!2012008 300,375.00 step up C B & T 1.500% 12/30/03 04!15104 500,000.00 Citizens Hank 1.8005'° .02/14103 2/16!2004 200,000.00 First Minnesota 1.850% 08!01!03 08/02!04 400,000,00 Wells Fargo 1.350°h 08/14/03 08/17!04 750,000.00 First Minnesota 1.400°k 10/16/03 04118!04 750,000.00 Firstfederal 1.800°h 04/10/03 04!15!04 750,000.00 First Minnesota 1.560% 1 V14/04 11/15/04 754,818.50 ~- $8,110, 715.93 SIa~S r L 2004 CITY OF HUTC HIN_5.ON FINAN CIAL REPORT _ 2004 JANUARY _ i ~~~~~ 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 JANUARY . REVENUE REPORT -G ENERAL .laeunRV _ ~ ~nnuna YEAR~TO ADOPTED BALANCE TAGE ERG E N ~~ YTD MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET _ REMAINING _ ___ __ USED _ TAXES I 3,371,260 3,3.71280.00 0.00% LICENSES ... 1158.01 ~ _ 1,887.00 1,887.00 43,700 41,813.00 4.32°h . PERMITS A ND FEES ~ 6947.46 _ 6,558,74 _ 8,558.74 _ .... 2 20,000 ' 213,441.26 2:98% .. INTERGOVERNMENTA LREVENUE 35214.75 J 12022.50 _ 12,022.50 _ 2,345,373 2,333350.50 0.51°k ... CHARGES FOR SERVI CES 56164.68 --- - 55,486.47 55,466.47 ~ - 1,391.896 1,336,411.53 3.88% FINES & FORFEITS I ~ 68,000 68,000.00 QDO% SALES -6179.9 596.00 96.00) 0.00 96.00 ° _ . __ INTEREST ___ _ __ 41810.13 _ __ 112.50 112.50 __ 32,000 31,887.50 _ 0.35% REIMBURSEMENTS ~ 2150 31,324.03 ~ _ 37,324.03 247,338 218013.87 12.$6° TRANSFERS ! 147.5 - 536 75 ~ -.. 536.75 1 478,500 1,477,963.25 0.04 0 .._ SURCHARGES - 6LDG PERMITS ~ .._ . ~ 129,50 129.50 _ _._0 129.50 0.00% TOTP L ~ 137 433 64 107,861.A9 107,961.49 9,188,089.00 9090,127,51 1.17% . , _ _ 2004 CITY OF HUTC HINSON FINAN CIAL REppR 2004 ! JANUARY; ~ 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004, JANUARY EXPENSE~ REPORT-G ENER A L JANUaRr 3nnuna __ _ ~ YEAR TO ADOPTED BALAN6 ~ _E_RCENT_AGE I __ _ YTD MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED I 001 MAYO R & CITY C OUNCIL 3770.31 5588.51 5588.51 57 749.00 52,160.49 8.68°h 002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 23679.59 21355.91 21355.81 252,341.00 230,985.09 8.46% 003 ELECTIONS I 60.23 38.63 _ 39.63 _ 15,134.00 _. 15,094.37 _ _ _028% 004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 46737.03 31405.57 31405.57 448,758.00 417 352.43 7.OD% 005 MOTORVEHIGLE _ 23743.44 _ 15895.04 15885.04 194474.00 178,578.96 8.17°~ OD6 ASSESSING I A1,000.OD 41,00. _ o OD7 LEGAL ' 12137.16 8737.16 8737.16 _ 190,318.00 181 581.84 4.59°k 006 PLANNING . 14817.2 _. 12855.25 _... 12855.25 181509.00 148,653.75 7,86% OD8 INFORMATION SERVICES 20751.32 10860.55 10880.55 1fi0,108.00 148,247.45 6.78% _ 110 POLICE DEPARTMENT ~ 354058.67 190368,17 1803fi8.17 2489,349.00 2,278,980.63 7.71% _. 115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 3475.13 ~~ ~ 104.28 _. 104.28 12000.00 11,895.72 ,_ 0.87% 120 FIRE DEPARTMENT 35879.99 ~ 20281.34 20281.34 __ 368,408.00 348,124.86 5.51% 130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS _ 17695.88 15055.3 15055,3 192,650.00 177,584.70 _ 7.81% 150 ENGINEERING 54242.81 _ 33990.25 33990.25 488,191.00 454,200.75 6.96% _ _ 152 STREETS & ALLEYS aa6a9 99 __ 57039.57 57038.571 778,425.00 _ 721,385,4 3 7.33% 160 CITY HALL BUILDING . ~ 35875.851 8176.51 $178.51 134,787.00 _ _126,610.49 6.07% T 201 PARK/RECREATION ADMINIS z0259.22! 16028.8 16028.6 183,080.00 167,051.40 8.75°h _ _ 202 RECREATION ~ _ ts9ta.e91 _ 10185.56 _ _10185.56 197,758.00 _ , 187,572.44 _... _5.15% 203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ttazs.9 ~58 2936.58 51,378.00 1 48,441.42 5.72°k _ 204 CIVIC ARENA 59354.88 36588.08 - 36588.06 - 281 283.00 244,704.94 13.01% _ __ 205 PARK DEPARTMENT 80888.05 47834.68 47934.68 798,113.00 750,178.32 B.D1% 206 RECREATION BUILDING & POOy 15622.1 9338.87 9336.87 122,327.00 ___112,990.13 7.63% 207 EVENTS CENTER 2eos7,as 18912.99 16872.99 163,366.00 148.473.01 10.35° 206 EVERGREEN BUILDING 973.34 873.34 _ 13,250.00 12276.88 7.35% 250 LIBRARY 2868.03 _ 2665.17 2665.17 _ 148 348.00 145,682.83 1.80% _ 301 CEMETERY 2ss7s.15 _ __ 675 6.1 _ 8756.1 _121,248.00 114,491.90 __5.57°~ 310 DEBT SERVICE _ 152oae.ea _ 218,741.00 _ 219 741.00 0.00% 320 AIRPORT __ _ ___ e526.55 4737.1 _ 47371 120914.00 116,178.90 _ 3.92% 350 UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPE _ 5teza a6 38535.08 38535.08 812,050.00 773,514.92 4.75% TOTAL . 1,205 91 0.33 825 343.17 625 343.17 ~~ 9 198 08fi.00 8 572 742.83 6.80°~ ~G~10 2003 _ 703.01 CITY OF HUTC ~ ~ HINSON FINAN ~ CIAL REPOR _ _ JANUARY 8003 2004 2004 2003 _ NE( t.4L EREPORT-GE REVENU ACTUAL JANUARY YEAR TO ADOPTEO ~ BALANCE ~ERCENTAGE _ _ . Year to Date MONTH ATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED ~ 0 00 0.00 0.00 3371,2817.00 3,371,280.00 0.00% LICENSES . 1158.01 1,887.00 1x887.00 43700.00 411813.00 ._4.32% , PERMITS A ... ND FEES _ 8 947.46 _ 8,558.74 6,558.74 220,000.00 213,441.26 2.96% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE , 214 75 35 _ 1722.50 12 12,022.50 2,345,373.00 2 333 350 5D _ 0.51% CHARGES FDR SERVICES I . , 56 184.68 _ , 5 5 4 86.47 55,486.47 1,391,898.00 1,338,411.53 _3.99°/a , _ _ 0.00 FINES 8 FORFEITS . , . 0.00 0.00 66,000.00 88 OD0.00 ._ 0.00% +. 0 00 SALES -96.00 .. {98 00 _ O.DO 98.00 0.00% . _ _ ~ A1 810 13 _ ~ 112 50 : 112.50 32,000.00 31,887.50 0.35°~ , . INTEREST _ _ 2,150.00 ' REIMBURSEMENTS . 31,324.03 31,324.03 247,338.00 216,013.97 12.66% _ . G 147.50 TRANSFERS _ 536.75 536.75 _ 1,478,500.00 1,477,983.25 _0.04% _ _ 0.00 S -BLDG PERMI~ SURGHARGE __ 129.50 ~~ 129.50 ~ O.OD (129.50 0.00% TOTAL _ _ 137 433 84 107 961 49 107,961.49 9,188,089.00 9,080,127.51 1:17% , . --f-- ..... , . - .. _. - -~~ I .. General Go vt ~ 161 511.93 114,914.13 114,914.13 1,656,179.00 1,541,284.87 8.94°h ~ . . , 209 65 411 09 809 225 809.09 225 3,042,405.00 2,816,595.91 7.42% Public Safety _ Alleys Streets& . ~ . , 144,826.20 . _ , 91,029.82 _ , 91.028.82 _ 1,268816.00 _1,175,586.18 ___ 7.18°~ _ Perks&Recreatlon t 4068176.54 _ 150,317.85 _ 150,317.95 2,080,18100 1,929,883.05 7.233'° .. Miscellaneous _ _. OTAL _ 61,458.01 810 33 1 205 x3,272;18 343.17 825 __43,272.18 625,343.17 .. 1,152,705.00 i 9,198,086.00 1,109,432.82 8,572,742.83 ' 3.75°k 6. ° . 1 , , , C~ ,.,.,1r~1~ _ :~: ~~ ,~» ^~^y ~V.~~f ~ ~p ~ C'~~I "r ~~~ D k ~~ ~_ ~ ~; ~ ~ ~i # ~;y~ ~'J'~ ' ,.M~'+p~~d '"1~ ' o' , y; _f ~ ~~g ~ ~ ::. I'Nl f"'~1~'~,; ~Y~.~!~'~ ~--~N~t`~ _..%',`I k'=~i r" i~~ 1......... ,~`i ti.~•c - :-.1~! ir,.....6.,~~1.~~ „~ . ~ ' I c~u"X , -~ ~i i ~ ~~ ~In'krr. , i W i _ r m ~ ~ , ~~ ~_ i ,~, ~~ k ai BVT - ak 2 - rrps puauaa 1~ ~° ~' ~ ~i _ ~ ~R" ~A"kY I , ~ , ~I: i !I ~ ~ ~k•u~ r~c I °w ~~, ~, - {a~ k4 ~k, (t,~_ I . ~i~ ~ ~_~~ i ~ r,~~v .i, °r ~~~ ,aQ ,~a 18 ~:c~ta~ro<.rea~a'6~ ui~ ~i ..~ ~~Nr I ,~ , vial i n a,~_i ~ ~~p'rr~u ~ ~ I i I,~_.i kk~w~~, r~~r ~'d~a,~ kk~~~iro na~~:- :; krh d^<ksgP~uk„ - ~r ~ ~„~ G+~~~ ,. ~i °. ~r~rri,,). .. . i I liii~ ~ lr{.r -i i -~!r i~ yam`, n~,,'k~'~1iG`.~'11~'b ~ sd~~ iFr~~'~,~@IfY _~I'°%~`~. ~~ .~~GV~~ ~i i ' ~ .;{~ tr~i ' II~~" i :. - ~C 6?1 .i ,I ~!?'i~'"r ~~~'R~~."~ k.:P¢~ ~"Pn~l ail o ~.. '1YIry~ i ur,~uti i ~ id-;~-. if-~r I ~ ,i;l ~;i ,-,i1'~j M' ~ -„~ ~~'8~~543 11= i ~ ::f"f1~~-y1"il~ C9%'~I'~~ ~dBl i31: ,I~~ ~ Cii ~~ ~;t 4~~R ,'I _,rtl~i s'~i ~;,~,~.~ ~-- ~; i 'i i-o~o--1 !1~1'~. '~ ~nl, r~~~i;~~-;~d°;~~~~ r.rro~~~ ~'o'~~~u~ Neo . ~ L,u ~ ,~ ;~ ~a~~~~ f~aaw~ ~k~~~a~ dr i ~. I~~ ~,rus~~~~ .-.I 1&!?~1.}in. NkIJiYY ~"Y ~}. ~.Y~..µ :~~T ~ ;~h~ '~I(~ .. ~~. ,.~, ~ k ~ ~'~ J ~~ -., ~ r, y I a _ ~T ~~yLh~ ;5., ` ,~ .~ a ,~ t _ ~ ST Ar l ^,.: ~ P'~ r ~' s ~G~~.41~~h k s y ~~~ -~n, w ~~. r t s+' f t u ^: : ~ ~ X3+1 :t r~ " ,~r$r"" , rk: f . ,~~• r ~ I', ~4 1 ~r s ~~ r r ~ ~~ ~~., Y ~t'T,'1lSY 7H1'[7'1.'iti'Y. I fI ~I~;~!t rt~111 tt I .r::ri~-, 1'1 Y. t!-- L11iL7 Gklil ~'.~~ V...._,. ^~.. ~ ,.~ .r.;:l.r a. ~:. n _ ~'~ _ n ~ I -. III - j '~ ~~ u V u I x gryg q ti~x d q 9 __ ~. -_. ...... e.~...... mm.. ~. ,..... ~. ... .. .. p ........... ... ... ... ~! i~: ~ ~~WO Hutchinson Cit Center 111 Hessen Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320.5$7.5131/k'ax 3TA•234424U MEMORANDUM DATE: February ]9, 2004 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBTECT: CdNSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT Td 20NlNG ORDINANCE SECTIONS 3 AND 10.07 ADDING DEFINITION OF TEMPORARY PENCE AND ADDING LANGUAGE TO INCLUDE TEMPORARY FENCES IN THE ,ZONING ORDINANCE Pursuant to Sections 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for an amendment to the zoning ordinance. IIISTORY After cotrespondcnce from a resident regarding snow fences (12/16/03), the Ciry Council has directed the Planning Statf to consider amending the zoning ordinance to address temporary fences. Planning Stall' reviewed the fence ordinance and determined a minor amount of additional language should be added to define a temporary fence and also add the words including temporary to the fence ordinance in place at this time. A pemrit and fee would then be required fox a temporary fence. The amendment was tabled at the January Planning Commission meeting and Planning Staff was directed to research other cities fence requirements. Staff has prepared a list of communities surveyed regarding temporary fences. Attached is the list and their regulations. It is evident that other cities do not address temporary fences in specific. Many of the cities interpret the placement and regulation to fall into the same category as permanent fences. The exception is W illmaz, where they do not allow temporary snow farces at all. Although, the code language did not speciScally state that temporary fences were not allowed. Chaslta's ordinance is interesting in that it discusses aesthetic qualities of a fence. FINDINGS OF~~~'1' 1. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 8, 2004. 2. There was no one presart at the February meeting objectutg to the request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Coxnmissivn voted unanimously to approve the amendment to the ordinance adding language to include temporary fences. Respt~/ tful~ 1~~ tt d. Dean Kirchoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission Printed on recycled paper - Temporary Fences: Albert Lea: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Alexandria: Austin: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as pernnanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Bemid t: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the city fence ordinance. (Fax to be sent) Cambridge: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Chaska: No ordinance against temporary Fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Dulath: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Farmington: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Fereus Falls: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the city ordinance. (Fax to be sent) Minnetrista: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. Monticello: No ordinance against temporary fences. Temporary fences fall into the same category as permanent fences and are regulated by the attached ordinance. St. Cloud: No ordinance against temporary fences, but the city official I spoke with stated that temporary fences couldn't exceed Oft. in height. The permanent fence ordinance is attached. Willmar Temporary snow fences are not allowed- However, this is not stated in the city fence ordinance and was communicated to me via telephone. The city fence ordinance is attached. ~R ,.,...,CITY OF HUTCHINSON PL , :.,-..r.,..-..,.........~.~ .,~. -, ,.., .. ,-....~..,,~..... , . ANNING STAFF REPORT " To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Aolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John Olsoa, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave Erlandson, Dick Nagy, Julie Wisehnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: February 4, 2004 -Meeting Date February 77, 2004 Re: Amendment to 7..oning Ordinance Sections 3 and 10.07 regarding temporary fences Staff has prepared a list of communities surveyed regarding temporary fences. Attached is the list and their regulations. It is evident that other cities do not address temporary fences in specific. Many of the cities interpret the placement and regulation to fall into the same category as permanent fences. 'I"he exception is Willmar, where they do not allow temporary snow fences at all. Although, the code language did not specifically state that temporary fences were not allowed. Chaska's ordinance is interesting in that it discusses aesthetic qualities of a fence. Statf is still recommending the minor language change as last month, even though it does not specifically address the particular neighbor's complaint. However, Staff has outlined additional options for the Planning Commission to consider: 1. Do not allow temporary fences at all and provide language in the City Code (i.c. "temporary fences (without footings and/or posts placed in the ground) are not allowed). 2. Add the language change as proposed by staff and further define temporary as "a period not to exceed 5 months". Additional language could also state that the temporary fence may not "consist of ropes or other features which may be injurious to the public". 3. Do nothing and add no language changes to the City Code. Cc: Glennard Pawelk, 400 School Road North Orlin Henke, 410 School Road North Jeff Juncewski, property owner, 400 School Road North RESOLUTION NO. 12342 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDC,ET VENDOR SunPorts Shelters 3 $16,912 Shelter Park (1) MN/Wis Playground (])Money will come over future years park sponsorship -see CC meeting of 2/10/04 The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Unleaded Fuel - 8,498 gal Diese] Fuel - 7,499 gal $11,691.97 $7,572.87 Operations Operations HATS HATS YES YES RCH RCH Date Approved: Motion Made By: Resolution submitted for Council action by: Ken Merrill, Finance Director Seconded By: s~~~ a RESOLUTION NO. 12344 ADOPTING 2004 FEE SCHEDULES WHEREAS, the City of Ilutchinson is empowered by previously passed ordinances to impose fees for services, and WHEREAS, based upon the recommendation of costs for providing the services for various city departments NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THAT THE FOLLOWING FEE SCHEDULES ARE ADOPTED: (a) 2004 Building Permit Fee Schedule (b) 2004 Compost/Transfer Facility Gaie Fee Schedule (c) 2004 Engineering Fee Schedule (d) 2004 Event Center Fee Schedule (e) 2004 Evergreen Reservation Fee Schedule (f) 2004 Fire Department Fee Schedule (g) 2004 HRA Fee Schedule (h) 2004 hnprovement Project Expense Rates Schedule (i) 2004 Licenses and Pemaits Fee Schedule (j) 2004 Liquor License Fee Schedule (k) 2004 Mapping and Printing Service Fee Schedule (1) 2004 Planning and Land Use Fee Schedule (m)2004 Police Aepartment Fee Schedule (n) 2004 Parks, Recreation, and Community Education Fee Schedule (o) 2004 Bulk Water Purchase Fee Schedule (p) 2004 Plumbing Permit Water Meter Fec Schedule (q) 2004 Water Tum-On Fee Schedule *Fee schedules attached Adopted by the City Council this 24TH day of February, 2004. Marlin Torgerson, Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator SC.b~3 Cif ref ~artctairt~c 2014 13rrild'iug Pearr~ait ~'er~ 5cr~ciu~e l~ isLr~d h ~~~ Ferr~lit ~~:hc~~ule ---- ~iG f ~~c 1•'ec :lntrrttnl \'rrtrs _..~ _ _- --- - ~ ~;;,~,at~~tily ~~°tii~lential P~et~~~n~~ ~r30.O(l t~l~i~~ ~,~n ~ ~i~~~ I ~° 1 2 Faurrriiy ~~~~~ic~crzti37 ,l~~.y~di~., "~:~C~.~1[~ ,~t,t~ ~,, ~ h ~~ ~,;~ f..,~ 1 ~ ~;~rrti~ ~~~ide.tia~ '`!~rtd~ r~.~..Ytn,.,~.,,,.x,~.r~~- 3~.~~ ~~t ~ark~r i' 1"v~~r~raa~~#ur~ ~+~k~1e~ Flrstrt is#a11 '~1t~.~ ~al~,~ ~r~aar~ ~` ~~1 ~~.+~ e~~rd~ir~r~ (~n~:~~~es irt~~ti~trt ~t~1~ ~~"~°aartit ~f~.U{;t ltas ura~~tar~~ tew tfl~i't ~~trc~ ~~47.~~ }~~~ l~~rv~lr~z fw' xc~wa#ianl'TeTrt~c~r~ry ~'tµrrtit ~.C~~ p~t~~' ~'r~haa;~ i iy1~ F~rrr~rtt ~.~[t ~~et~ squ,ar~ ~ta# vwrit a t~tirtiarrt~nrt is ~r~ 3G~.0~, pl'~~ urc&~ar f~~ ~rLd ~x~#~rrt rrra# ire if ~ r~tttnc~ i +.t111~;W~~~;~ ~r"~C~1"t~ CY1~7 rr~~tt ~~ ~.~~ f'.r y~r ~ ~r~n#, ~~rrriit:s der al~rtdr year 11~trn~~d ~r ~rraae:rt. ttr#~.l~~e~1"T"~rrt~-s~trary i~t l~~;t°rrt~t ~~.~ ~f~4~.~ dep~wsit ~r»r b~ ~~itt~cl.~ a~'~~~t~ ~ rrrt~vc~ utktira A~~t~t.~,~~1'"~'.t"~~t~t.~# ,~L'~YI,. V,V ~`~r ~ s~ructt~ure 1nt~ ~~trc,~r e ~e~ anr~ ~xt~~tittn rrxtt i ~ ~ry ~ w ~ Y ~'~''w„t~~~d~~+~~N,~.r' ~lltt~ ~x~~t~~#i~art ~~rra7a~. ~`et/ c~ ~~r~;tL~~e ~'~~. Arta ;~p~af ~~~~ d~a~a~~t chcl c~~ .~{~lda~r ~"~tr the fr~'# 1 ~ des a~ lrct~~ F~twr°t~~i# ~'~~.t~ 1Gt~.t~~b/clay t~mer~fkr txp tit ~ ~xt~irt~ut ~tf w~~~ c~~y~. (a,~1.5 "t°~~, N 1. C~ i : i+~ ~V~ I :C~1"~,i~T~~' ~ ~J'~T~ L)E14~C:~1~~'TI1'~i ~' ~ }~.~'~~'l~'.1~~ .. ~:~rl~ ~t, ~ri~~~v~y ~~r~#r, and k-I~At~i~ 3U.~~ p1u~ ~urc~h~ar~~~ ~'~: ~urf~.~i ~r%ve~~y ~'~rrr~it ~"~rar`°.r~ ~?~r•trt# $~q.C~t~ Itt~ ~ttrch~~rg~ ~~~~: ~'i~i1~ B~s~~~ 6C~.~~ l~t~ ~r~ar e ~~~ __.__.. ~tilt~ ~Lll'l'11~3°~l' 1"~ ~clt~.•dtr~r f'cc '1'r ltc I~•k~c :~rttr-rttt# ~ hntc~ -- ~ LrrtCl~~la+~' s ~ ~ r ~ ~ _..... s ~ ~,~ I1,:3,1u.~~ m.:Sll:~.;:a~l~~ ~t;~+~i~ill;~ ~;~,~II~1+~ ~ ~1 l~ti~;;~ Sty r1 rCt~7~lll'1 ~tir~V~:k1dJtL ~~wC}~ ~~ti t~~sl~+~l~Ll~~ ~,:>G~a~~ ''~'~;,.C~;.l,li p „_ ~zrrc~ra ~°~a~~cctartcnt, derwk, ~lrl~~:~v~v, s~~~,ds~ aluatir~rt, tip #ct ~ro~k~~,~1~C~ 1,CIQ~(~,(~{~l7 tit ,~~~,~Q 'r'~:,f~d0,C7~~~ t~ ,~-~,C~~~ 4,C~f~l~~fi)t)l~ ~~ `65,~~CJ~,r~~I~Q S,f~QC~,4~(l~ ~ra~ct ~rv~r tail (.0~ ~lt~ti~trt _~._~ '%vV~.~,>~t~;tt~rt W ,(~C~'~,4~~~ .0(~~ + T,OCt.Qfi~ ~!«~~tir•+rt ~. ,lJ~I+~,G~ClM~ .~Q~l + 1,~11~.1~ ~w~.~~.l,l~itJQ,;)t,_l yP~'a.V^J'~~y~~!~ ~..~~L7: `~- w~~y~...~.L1Lm 1 ~ oaf` i rukh:inon X04 B~i~~ig ~?"trnti~ ~~ ~he~~t~e Fc•c ~~ `_ ~~• ,! F't~c ~~~-urrnt 1._. ~ II ~utC~ 1~~ .__~,._,_.. _.. _, .. _ - 6 ~~°~lta1 ~.~:rml~laint Itl~l~~ "i ~i~ T'. ~ hi~~~~!-.,a ~ ~~_~ ~ 1 . ~:, ~vr~_..,.m, ~_ .,:. ,, w~ ~i.., i.t~t; mM__-_ ' .~~.., ~~, ry . "r~ ~.1 f to tl~t ~ R~.. (; t)115~rl~Clt1~)lY ~'~1t~E I' ~~~ ~v'~'t'r' ~e~r°~rn~r~t C;~7T1.51.r-u(~t1r~17 ';r~dlr~r' '7(7~ 1C~ 'l~lr i. ~~u~~ ~tSttl~ ~~f]rT1~ ~fl1~7~C~1~Tt ~~'~'~~~:"~~~ ~~,' ssssrt~t~t r~r~~re ~~s~s~~~~~~~t: ~~r~,l~ ~ ~csi~ti~ ~Ii wwtli Ei7iA~~~-rin C~ ~rtn~ ~ ~~..~~~ ~~.t'~~~rll~l ~I.~t~~~c~~tC)t7 S'~ ~tr+~~t'rit'tC ~~"~L~t"t ~~,]~~1., ~1"C~'" ~~, ~l~'C~~1~tiSk~t1., ~.t~ ~~l~t;G~Att]St~t~ ~~t~t~~,S ~~~ t:~'t' ~r15~7~1:1{~t1~ ~rtd ~~~~;~ .~ Tr~s~aec~t+~r~s ~1ttt~ Q t1~?I'[]~'~t~ ~7Lt~'tt~~~r ~bl~t" ~tlltrttT'l~ttrr"t ~~1~T'~; ~tl ~'t~t~CS~ ~~1~1S~~C'~fl~Tl :~~5 wtS~~S~~ Uirtl~t` r~ITV].~Rd"d~ ~l~ ~+~E'~ltl{"YI} ~ ~. ~ ' ~C1.~'~}t'~~GtlOt7 ~r V4Jtlw~ A1~ ~ I ~;t~eciiically ~r~tlicat~d (ra°~~.i~trn char _ ct~~:--halt 11~~ur~ t'~iC~CalllSpl~e~~ ~3~Y 2'~1 ItLV 1'~1~14~11'C~M,~ ~7'~' G~'t~.t1S, ~Q~~t$tCY0.~~'g ~r re'V"15t~Yrt 1L"i ct~~rC~Vd'C~ ~IrtS ~ilrli.t't~tlrl~ h~r~ ~' 'C9rt-~'tr~~~ ~1t~N1r~ ~' r the t~t:~l ]~.~t~rl ~ast~ a~~"d~ j~tri~it~clrt~ ~a~.~~r t~ t'•~~ :.~.at. ~~e ~~~ ~h~il it~l~~l~ st~a:t°~aiira~a, ~av~rad, l~t~~rr~rmt~ ~tc~tzrl v~aa~, att~d ~'rir~+~ b~rl~t ~a'th t~~a~a~ ir~vlvw .F"i ~~+ ~t• 'T~_~re __ f~~~ r ~3d.itiorr~ll ~r~ ~prir~kl~~r ~rs~~~n r~iitkeM~ `v~i~•m P"errnit ~e Scl>it;clul~• _ _ _.. ~ kt~c ~mliunt~~ \irtea 1 ._ i,- ~'~li.<<_il To 1~'.,~ ~.1~11 ~ t1~.. tai .l &Lr ~~ ~~~ ~~rntl,~. ~ua,~t~~~t. F-~i u~~ ;~. ~,ta~ ~ar~~r . ~'"Yrtn ~~.~~ i~~~~~ ~" 5e~~iule ..~_ __.. ._T 1'l~~n ]te.vi~~~ ~- + ~" c,t the. L;~~il~Il~r~~; P~~~~~7t F~~~~:~ ~Caky t~~ ul~hin+~ ~~D~14 Buildup Fe~t~rnt ~dul~e PI'urnlairr~ ,1'cr°uii~ ~~'e~ ch~eclul~ I''t:t~ ~l~~pi• I're :Irytiii~nt l~ 1r~te~ _ ._ ~~ attr ~u~td.~"~ar tee... ~ ~i~ 1 ~:r c ~a X(~+~.~~f~ t, ~'Yt tit` ~.~1(~.4.1t~ rr~~,.ia, ~~~ ;r ~r~ ~urlt~t , "~~ rst~ ~ ~n~ C:Jrrd~r`~a~~r~ ,ltt~tt~~ its Agar ~txrt~~ ~"e~t (~.t~~1 ~~~ tar 1 C~.~~~ rrtattzrt~ {~t~r~~t~rtxtw~i~zrra~ "G~~'at~r° ~~n ltw.~"1"~ ~atr~ily trsicira (}.~1+~ ~~Jl (~tk~t" ~ ~n~tr~tt~rrr~ ~ ~~.~(~ t~mra~er•i~l ^l~txt~rr ~ltr,a"I;it~n ~ ~'r`~ V1~"'at~t° ~f.t;r ~"~~ A~ ,~•r ~•r~~t. ~~t y ~ti~~er e~artr~~t~~lt 1 st~rt:,l~ar~;~ ~~~ • ~, ~~ ~t~n~er~c~n C,t~t~tt~~ctt~tt ~st~ ` ~rc~~x ~~~1 ~rl lr~ rlt,~cr~' cr~° 1 C7(~,~~~~ lug surhar~ ~ !~a lintw~ 9~.~a~a+ct~tr~t ~. ~.C~fJ lug su~~~t,~~~ ~~,~ 1'~c.nit;~l Ft~~w ~).C~t~ _ r ~lu~tit~n _,_ :~ ~ %o~ ~~ .. _~.. ~.. iCl~~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ rrMatr 1"~; (~~~1VW~'1"r~t'r:~.~'S° ~l~a'lY''G''S~ ~~ tct reel nt7~~ ,~t~.r liriu;jr ~i , ~ 9", ~'~ Sri; it°rr'r li~~ble dlTll~UE'1~ t~~7 ~.t~ t~ tt°l~t t"lrl ~~; s"~t"1171t;I1°L .p+lc~~ilt~ tt~ ~,~rc~~~ ~r~rf~~d per ~ca~r~r 1, 1~±~, C`'t~rrfi~~~ ~tttlt~tmirtt ~~~7th ('it~a ~r~~~irleer~t'~;~ T)~pa~:rnt~~ ~vvrl~~ater :~c~~ ,r~,tae~s ~" _ w . ®..~~__. ~alic~~l~. tt~ p~~7 cl ~c~f ~rvi~~t~1y ~:~~s~~c~, ~t~rt[~°~°r~ ~~ri~~ ~;ity ~rt~it~er•~rr, 1L~~pr~~ntwt~~. ~"~~ ~:~~ 19~~ Stag ~t~~u~rr~ F~•,.•~ ~'~r,~>k~-rrc~it~t~'4~'~Iu~tic~n E~ ~~ualk~~d Annually __ _. -- ._ - -- - 7'the. ;I "~~rln.rtic~n .1L s~~~ ~ l i il~~~ n~ ,{{ , p 31" ~1 1Wx ii rT~~ ~ ( •M d . A J ~ " ._ f ~^ ~~~. _;..I.. ~_' F & f~~Y~ yy ry ~ + E.''C~~KuC d"1.~~~ ^ ~ y ~ y ^ ry .S ,L . 1 / { g ^ A ~ Ll'"~T~ ,G.~~.Y~'~L ~~b rci~ ~.~ l~ ~xr` "tai .~~YS~~1"1~I7~ l~lr",I SI1L'~ __ ~ ~ . ~ Uc"x~"C•;. ~f1d37: "'~"+w~tl "ti'~7c~ '~~.1~~' 1~~S~L1~It'C".~C1~t y7 ~~i'1,~, ,~' l Il l ~1714~G~. ~, ~. ~ ISL L1~iCC f C.7C7t ~I11A15111'L~ m_ __... ,~~.~ ~5 xr~C 1~"~(at . ~"irel~x~~ ~'aluatia-3la __ 911EiSllIlry _ vr~~ gy ,pryy,,,~~yy ~~yy,~y w.(Ya~IDV.,~,.f.Y A1J .3 ~xsnn i~rr~,1~~ 4. ~4 J'.~ rx~r~ f~i`~t assn il~"~x°h '~5'~. ~ 1~cgu~~ fi"~~at ~r~~riecl ~"c~r~~ ~"~8,' ~~squ~r' facat ~..i~ir~~~i ~'~~tt~tc!'tkc~~ ~+~",`~ lpp u~I~r li,c~t ~~iC~i~S: ~'[~t'-t~~,~ld'~d''~' N77~ ,~l~i~ A,~x l~c"Rx~ ~oc`!t ,( nxr~tr'rr~•tior, 1 ilu c !'c~rrrrit l~~c~e~ '\rtitc~ _ _ fiar t1~Ie l:r~st SCIi~ ~xxs 3.a~ f"~r ec ~~i~i~>r~a~ 14~1~ cs i~~l m yl~~~ ~ ~~ ~TLiCtrt=~T1 fil"i('T"t'C)t T(~ Lt11C~ 1C~181'r' ~~, 6.Iv~~ ~~°I ~' f1~51~ ~ ~,.{.51 lx~~ ~.~.~~~~ 1i~~7,~" ~.C~'xx ~xddrtaazxl ~~~1~~ ~" ~1~~ - ~:~,~ ~.~ TC~rTI r°~1:(} ~x~1~ 1~1C'Lx,~1i"~ ~~~ ~,,...,. ............. ,~,~ ;~~r ~~: 1~ist ,~l~trl ~c~u~ ~.1~~ ~"~ ka clc~:i~i~na~ ~1,t~4:1 or' ~?,fl(~1 - ~1,~71~C~ 1 .'.~~ fr~xct~n tlx~~'e~fi~r:~ end rr.c~lur~~rr~, S~Y,I~f ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tI ~~-yp ~ ¢~~+~y~-y,~"y~y 7 ~}yj5y ~^y Q+ ~y~ 1 ~~ f , T . Y1V.A ~tr~ ~i C~ r ~v ~~ : ~ ~.~~r ~~~~~. ~~,{~~.~~~., 1.J~ +(Ix ~410.n ,1.1 34 wll 'U g'3.d'V LF Q,YT,~ ~°~~^pp ~~""ryry y ~~rryy,~a (^"yq gyp, ,IY.A'~J, ld~l "" ,',1. 4J tf'4..F tY /~::yy ~'4l. / ~ ~~ yy "}} 77__ ,„]~ ~ I ~r „] "~ } y~ ~_'I"C~~',+~~'1~~. ~11u''~,,~~~ G~I,Cr,U. r.xxc~l.xx.r.xx, ~~1 M1.±ryV'4~y.Y ~.4.1A~'~.rlr~~~,.i~.~ ~g1P k.,~Ld ~Y~ 1 1 . c 4,d 1~'.~ s~'G" A. l~ ~ C ~ .~G.A ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1~ y ' ~ ~~ l ~ ~ . ll ~ ~ . J 3 ~rye~g1 1'.n1 grvle'' •ry+,rvr1 ~ ~'y ~y{'y ~WN'd, 4~'4Ja~J 4.lW "` ~~~~y1,~A %~,'4,~., ~"r *~~q. "~ e,~,A'~'. !~'~ h 1rv ~' ~v 1~al~ ny~ry ~ptl y q } 9 y ~ ~a y~y pry y^~W ~ y ,~ ^ ~ n y ry 9 ry ~ ry / ~ ~ yp~ ® y ~ 1 C L S. C i 11 L ~ ~n L Lf l . L ~M1.F R.i~l L1 1LL N./A 4 LW A 1.1.Y~ ~ 1J ~ j l J t A ' V y ~ ~+~ry ,... A/ p1 yA (' ~ (~ y~, k 1T^,~~q { g~~ry1 y$ /-+~g~y ry R ~`.T~~p~^~~ ~yry~ p ~ } y y q+ ~ , T ^~ ~ + 5u y ~r r~ ry1 ~y 1 LS ~,N' ~, 5„~ ~ ~ n J:' LA L 1 Y5u J'.1 1 ~3 ~ y ,l b L ~ ~ ~J :~'"~ n ~ / lk w ~ffi. C A. ~W 3A 4 i Y 4 J 1~.6~r X.,+F,AUb,& '4/'.~~ yll~~ 6A 1, L ~ +r~ 1e'-h1 ,,n^~11 ptttt^n1 gg11~~ ~~ryµ~~., ~p/ryryryry 1~^r,1 ®ry~ p}ry~{yry~ ~~YAI. ~.tiJ,AYl xi,{P~.~V k.~'SJ y'4..!'tiM' w,r ,+-yy ~.m.J'. ry , y ryg ^~ry yl a~ '' ~ryry ~y' { 1~y gy l lpl p/~ } ry ~m yry ~ y ~ y, g p y ~y y q y ~ a y y ~ l y q~ a ~I ~I.WI~ld. LYIti/'4»~4.e'~~'V Li.~~A d,.l ~WW.r~A~4F~WA~'k ~~W, y'lJ'~,O kF'~y ~.,k?l/ .. l,~l~J~,,(~1:~~~7.~.~~,~.s .~~~.. 1`"a~~,~ ~tul"t ~~~-dlti.~~n~.l ~.,1~1~ fur ~ii~.e ~irs~ (''~~~yy ~~'yy ~~"~y,1 ,.y 7' ... i yti1'LFy~~+~,Y1 R.~' (~}~~? ^7 y'~J[3. ! ¢ + 0.~,'~.~ 4~~' ~ ~ ~ .' ~ ~ , 1,~ ~ ' ~ '+ .~ . w ~~•~•~ . lyy 1y Y1 1~ y~-.~e.y~ yp- y{ g~p~. ~,wy~ l* yry~^ygy~^yyy+ y~w~, ~~'~yq+ yq~~~lfiry~yyy ~y*I~ ~q, ~^~. ~y pµ y y y q g ~ y YLx LJl'W.m ~11V d MLA.i W.I~.!k.. A'~ry~k~MV ~`" ~M'A A, IY~~ ~~I~A, A~.~W.~R~dAw7~A~. &i~~'4.~",1 g~ 31 Y~.'4+~1d8~..^ 1.A'& „.f° L p ~pM ~qy ~" Yv~rY W.y }~q ` I~'g ~j ~'tld ~W. f..~~.~ L ffiNlfr INII~/Y ' & R'~ k~tauy 2.2~(p'p ~~ ~" ~~ntchn~ra 204 +Gate :Fey ~ch~e~lu~~ '[+cc "1'. j~c ~~ _ ~r,~s ~r~at~~~,~ +C~a~rr~r~c~al L~~~r~s ~~7d Gass C;lip~in~s {~aea-cc~r~/~rc~~~r - r~~ pl.s°~z"cfti ",c~r~ial ~vs end ray ~~p~rn~s ~l~~tre~`.~ ~ornrr~+~rcn~~ B~~sl~ (urac~~~° ~~„ ~'ra ~'ir~~ter~~ albs and ~r~~t~ tczrrns "l~~ra "~a~cl ~~~ ~~sid~~~~i~~,~C~~a~~~~~~1 ~"~~ ~.~~i~~~s '~rn~~°t .~p1~~1 C't~e .~lrninint ~~~~ r 1 ~. I r tin $0.a4~ ~r ~a~n 14.~~u ~r tin. 7.4~C~ S.t~4 per t~~~ per tea ` ~ Q~.(~ ~w~r fir. 4.~ per tin .C~t~ ~° t~~r~ * .~`d~x~s°~"~ ~~~t~~p~~~~ert~tz i,s• t ~~r~ ~~°: ,~, ,~~,~~ ;-;tl"~i;_ ~~~r,,,,`1`,•ar~ rt d~~~a~r~~~r~ ~a ~xr° 1~rc~ l~~r~s°. ~C"i~ ~nf ~rxt~z~nvn 1~~4 ~p~im~~a~rin~ ~+ ~~1~~~1 Ft~c Tr I,c -- Za~4 ~~t ~~~~er ++ ~tl~,~c]ule T~~~r-rrt ~;at~s Rr~~-~r~ ,L.~jic ~ _.~__. _ 1'~.c ~m.Efu~~t (~-'~~t l{+~uiii (_~+°crlirr~ ~~! t~ ~_'~_clinrr+-r r!r l.l!?11 tb~ .rf,r~ j _ ~i i~l!a, ~atu~~~ay, ~Y~rlicl~y~ $~".~J4:~ ..~... ,, ~alf`+~r~ea~ ~",~aa (s°~ntirr~ rtp tea ~":~t~ rlinrrE:r err ~S(~ tlrc~atr~, "t"ida~°, ~aaturdy, ~~a~lid~ $2{~.~ d~a~~t~r +~~re~~ R~ ~:+errtiny ~~:r to ~~(~ cCa`r~acr ~r .~'~. ~h~:rrtre,~ ~._ u~~day ~ ~ ~.~f~ tVlec~~i~~ Rupp ~~ (s~crtirr f~~^ ~~,~ ~~i.4~~ Pll~l~" ~ ~1(~lrC' r~t~is~ir~u~~tt) ~`~~y~tixa, fc~r .~(I~P ~'~~.~{~ Ih~~.i~ (~ hour r~,aiir~rrrxt} (:.` (se~'ti~x~~ f~~' 3'~~' $~M.~ fl~~i~ar ~ luxir «~iniu~~u~~t) Par~r~m~ ~l:~r~ ~.~~~.~ ~.~ ~a~~~~tin~~`'~x~x° ~~~ !~~Cd.~1~1 ,~~~~~:~r (; I~~~~,~- rx~irx~m~r~ .~ y~~i'c!il)I,~ ~~Y ~~~ ~r~~'„~~ ~~1()U'T' ~ }IltlLlt" 1"5~1~11"~"l~l'l7~ ".~C; ~Sk'r';rfdP1~ ~L'~Y" 13~ ~a2~.~~ lh~"CiY ~~ 1~€~~ur t~~irri~7~lilTl~ ~}~ ,~s~rxtrra_ , ~r~ X C~.~1~ ~17~~'~~' ~~ ~~c~w~r m~ini~1~~~1~ ~)f}1C~1" R~~L -- __ _ . _ _ _ _._. .....M... ......, ...,.~ 1~~~•c i'~ ~~c~ ! f't'L' :~i11Ui11![ '!l~ cc ~l ~ jrc ~ f~ ~t 1ni~~urt1 ;~^~~ u'~ ~:-;-i,,r:~' ~:)°`~ T~r,,~~:.,~ $3Cdrr.~~,, ~/da~, ~t:c~,~ ire. ~~,.~,a~~ I'" ar~rOcti;c~.~7 l~C ~t"raj ~~~r ~ ~ ~C~U ~.~u~x~a~ 1 ~~.~~ J~Iay '~~l~t~ ~~~•d~l~~~rad 4~ 1 ~.fl~b I~ Fr~an~r "T"r~~.s ~r~~~ ~ ~ $~.~Q~/I ~~.~~P i~~~y '~a~ c~a~ltaY~~' ';4 1 ~ .(~4~ Idy ""'`i~relss NI~c,~~pl~an~ 4~.~~~ ld~y C;~~f"c~ (`~~r~r~~c~tcra~d ~v~nt,~d 1C1.4~(t t~7r 4D ~.u _ y ~"~~f~ (ra~r~~c~xtr~r~c'r c~~tcrat,s°~ ~ I S.~;t~ f+.~.• SCE ~.u~a~ . .. ~d t'~je~Ct~r `6~7.~ .. 1dy' ~"ti~ra~c~ Sr~~-r .C)IC~ 1~' ~'~r~~ ..~_.~.~.~... .~4~ ~/~~y .~.. ~~Gdr~ ~"~'~' n,cr>;J~ .Dti~ ..~~ 1~:~'a.Jl~n~~M ~t '+~ ~'~.~~ .~__ I~ I]~~~aer ~sels .C~~d Id. ~" ~~"eca~rlt.° ~f,~rr ~ t ; r~t~° ~t~i r~1~r~~~~, r~c~~rr~ err 1,_,cr~t ~rn~ A~art~°~~~a.s~r ~r,~T~°~ ~„~e~ vet c~"~rt~v~~~ t~rr~> tr"~aa~ t~aa~ r~ca~° ~?t ~:.'~>~~^ ~~ld ' !++~~,~~~;~,,, ' , ~ ,ry ~ ~~ ~ ,~_ ~~,1lr~~f~~S~J. d~`3"' ~~"t~ .S'r'.a 2~' ~~T~"7~at~~~r" 5"~"~~~1 JI~f®..,,', i_; ~! i 'j ;r~ , _ tt~~ ~ ~,t'~ ~~~1~~~ c'w~~,~~^d r,~lr, rt.,~~rEr,~ ~,~ ~ ' °~ a.r. _ l~-. , ~,: r,. ~ . 15~ `~',~t`a~Y 4~'1~72t. 1~"dt ',~~'~' a~~ ~t` ?~.r ~~~'47u~~"~~~'~ra i~ r~ F.~ut~ to ~i~n ~~~~ ~~~re~r~ Rem ~~tia~ ~ ~c~~edu~~ l~~t ! ~-!~r leer :~r~rc~ur~t ~; -., _. ~' ~.ac~~~~ - I 5~.~ ~7d i~"~c~~atr~s ~ ~1~~~~~~- ~~~ al~~~~~~ r.as ~~~' ~f ~~tci~sc~ ~~0~~ I~~"irc ~~~rrt~crr~r~~ ~' ~~~,~r~~l _ - ~ _ _ l'l' .~111i11.!!lt _ ~'C'l' .1lT1U1lfll f _ --- _--~ ~ LC ~11lllllflt f 1 ~ (hir-~t lluw'1 I I`c•ru~til ilcrur) l {:1i1~!]tli~ll~r] (har~~~ { _ _~.,,_. LJ~.~-k-:~-~11 j„~~..!~t~~ dry, ~~~~.i,J~d 11'3 __ ~'~~Ir1T9~t1-et"1~~ l-Iti~ ~ ~'.~~~"(~~4Cltd_l1-ri~) ~tfi~l'17. ~~,4~~ .~' ~~._ .._ ~l~c~ ~,~ ~~~,~~r1t Try.) ~.~~ "~ p'"l~ts ~t~aaY ~ta~/l~r ~c~tai~ten~ la~~ ' l ~r~ht~r~ 2C~.C~ ~~' ~. ~~1~~ (~~~n~ °~"~°l',~ ~.t~f~ ~~u~ r~~~~~ri~l z~dl~r ec~~aaaxlent ud R.~~u ~.(~f~ .Q ri,'~ -- ~'cc f't~~t° I ) tt 1nli/unt l.l~~nsc~ I)ati'~ ~~ _ --- ~L,.,.... ~~_.. 1 ~ n ' vr~r~ , __ lifluti ~ T~ta~l~t~csn.l u~it~l~~~ ~~.[~f~° c~rr~~ r L ~ r~~~ ~~ ttf71]1 ~•l lip rtiakrk, ~at~~~ - rckrat~ci„ ~tt~ r~nr>t b~ ~m~d ~~~~lr ~~t~i.~r 1 (~.(b!Q~ ~at~~ar~ ~ - Li~tt~e ~~ ~s rl~t~lre~`tadab~e7 ~ 1L)~~~rrlb~r ?~ ~ b~ ~lri:~r~td, ~t~d ~,la~~~t ~ waive. ~` IV"s"'' tr~r~~s°~~ r~~°~rtrx~ ~ a~~r~~t c~~r"n :-~M,"~~ ~-~i ~a l~c~~r~,~c~ ra cr r~ct~°~~r~t ~~~Z~r~ lc~z~~e l~A~:: ~' i,W1.Y..VA.N !C~ty cad' ~.~~ut~chunsarr~ ~...: -- ~c 1 ~'t~t° ~ I~cr .~~nc~un~t `,._~ ~~_.rl~~rtiiination ~t~ntl~ ~t P:4~c ~ tr1~ ,F~ ~ ~"'1~~~~~'.~ i~'ewis~axt G~ ife: ebrc~a ~~ " ~ ~ °s ~' ~ Y 4 1 ~.... 1.. P,evi~ °f sits and grading pNans andlar plans ands spectlfrcauti°n;~ pre~ar~d by CIrc~ve4aper, °r tare-engineering aaf' recanstrlactian .~°Ia D@S~ ~ !"eVdf~'` 'praiects.. F..ng. ___. _„ En ineerin a ~"~ ~ .Ctala FI~Y~II fJesi rr °st to cramp&ete taNans and speci~':catrcans in~haurse. . _ png. g g . ° ~Canetr"4JC~w~~Mr1 Imncuudes an-stake crud cfF-site services Priwat~ devet~apers west R"eV~~W arld prrawide survey cantraa9 and may camplete'this'~ucrrk vutth a. ~y.~y'a~a, S~~k7n~^g c~onS~UNkant appraved lay t9rye Cbt~+ and pay these rests directly.. Eng. PC@l%17~It?~CI~I Plan review and dew~elcspment, aubdiwisi~an ands°r C3ewetoprraent 1.4~a1a ~t7ev~fca nA+~l~#* Agreements, etc. Eng. Cfkrl~r"aCt Assessment N~ali preparatian, r~ atakuke 4~g and cantract .~a/rc5 ,~C~rninl6t<r~'~~t5wn administratir~n arrcd rewiewu Eng. Project C~m~r'eher~sitre ("aN x sy~>tem rnapping and datatsase updating, riarntarenemsi:ve Adro~inistration °~u~° ~ ~°~`a l~'~c~nnirag* unfratr~u~rc;ture plnn'irag n~. "~ . aka .__.. TdSiilTtq' S~~~C@ Fvr city' ccara7plleted testang services Eng. Funding f°r F~CFtA pragra~m far suppartang na~using needs within the c~arnrcxrr~niky. '"t`he MRA 8~aard r,roay weave rhos fee pn prraie~ks l~#ra-t-5'af~zg N@8~S meekBng IIHrtA Hauling gcaa~s. Nat apptted t~s recarsskra.rckt+an crr °t.~al~ F~"rtd'~ kxun~c urtMiky inrlprasw~er~rlenks. htRA Ffnra+~i;~ul FinaricelLegall 1.CI°/a 5ervceS Band administratiaan„ praperty assessment inpaut. Fir}ar,ce _. ~ISC1~ a 3'/rcr y" Tithe review„ L7evel°pmentlSrc~atsdiwisicn Agrea~ment dewelrapr>PUenk ' 1.~Qala ~., ~.E' +~,~ Ser~v6ces and review, band! flscal review Fin;~rce . °h,;~,~ ;-ISCE~I~ atrrt~dized interest. Faa~rancae 24% Rederret~prrlenutlNa~vu°ly a4nns~xed (~lae nvt incltte the "'I~tcu~inr~ IVeed'Is t~rld'°.} " 25% Nerrv t~evel'crprt~ernt~: The City retain the right tr, approve Whil:h pra~jec# ilN tie c~r>r~p8ete~d' ' Utllllrl I I~~N 'Ur1I~l al urtalrucrNn aekt C)rl t~ld~ilrles ~ rC7'WeCt ~? the Clt C~7Ur1Cl'i,. ~ • "` ~ • "" III IItT"MtJrT'I rate, p'rt~Cltlddr"dC~ Ii N~ernS nLtte~i With rl ~tsterli~ ~~. Prpft UtINIDn +cre CIVt^~ - ~ ', - w ']°IO ~~'I`'Jls WWII tae chargled'' I;a~ed n the rages rla~td a17CaVe. Hlt~tchlncsr~ I"tNl~1 ri°1a!y~ WV~ thr~ "1 ~/rs ,, , "Hpltir~g Needs Immk~nd~" based pet the itlcltsii~an in the prraject ~f I~incaarr~ hr~ctir~g. ~C7T~S.° The City ret~irns the r gI"rt tea erbage ~ cerisuita~t to c~rr~pi'awte ~ pel°tucn cf th,e Er~ineering arld Frege~ct A~miniatit7l~. ~'he ~e~reiop~r~hall ha~~~ the Preiirninry 'irtel Plat a~rprawred prier trs work cr~mrt~encirq~ err tirnal de~i~n. inarl~Nal asstlr~r~ce,°bQr~dirrg r~ey tart requlired f~~r im~rower~ent beunc~ cr~rnpleted try private dr;v~lo~ers. The E~eve#eper ~hiP rrleet Ii design standards '~fld rrnamcNSl ltrety regltNrert7en$S a'f the Crt~r. _ L•I~tsses~^°a~ate,'""xperase r~U4' A~:~~a°rswer~ ~'~~ C'~lic)~ 2'.~~~97.!'~0.y ~~t of ]F~~at~cinm~ Z+~~Q L~~ne ~~r~! ~~rr~~t ~'el~ ScY>redul+ _ -- - ~ _ . ... L:iC'CCI~C'~~LT f11J1 ~ ~ I1C --- 1 ~'~t'C 1Tlli11117> ~.ICL'fltil' ~) iICS '~'~iI'I11V~1~ (,TCw~11i1L~c`~~~, A'.~'~Cd~1t`~~ -- ~ --:y~~.~.,!~ I _ .- ~i°T'tl~r]1ffi1~ ~i~'k~ aka li ~T"~~ Lu~el~~~c ~ U,~lf1 ,~ar~i~~ry 1 - ]C~Txal~ ~:rT?-~1~1 i nL*, Tl~vlc 1 ~V~Q.~I~[~ J~r~t~~ry ~' - ~7~T~S ~~lalin~ l~t~ ~~ ~.~{~ ~haart ~~."l~rl ~.TaT~rbli~~ L~c~l~c ~vt~st~~iaan 14~f~.~~~1 C~t~~ ~~11~iW ~r~l~~a~ algid lease I~a~ii~ar ~~r~~lr~e~°cal 1 ~1.{~~l ~11~Tr~r~r 1 - l7i~ei~l~er ~ 1 l~e~ele~t~al 1 f7~Y.QC~ :l~r~laa~y ~ - ~eeT~TI~ leeulin, +~.~tl~ ;l~.T~1lw1Y'~ ~ - I~ecT~er ~. l~.ecyGlia~ ~51NaC~ ~k"9,17~ .~~ l~eT" ~'~1 s"•1'~r~~e ~T'V1C1~'~ ~%~ '. ~~Tll,lc"TC~r ~ ~ ~Rt;eT11~7T" ~. ~()~~}1"1L'ed l~l~~.;~~°t l~"eT"I~11~; .~}.~~ ~c"1ffillllc"R~"~' ~, ° ~G~~TI}Jiwi" ~ l~"arCl l~1wI~T11 .~~ ~~7t7[i TT'tT'i l~~C~~~f~T~tT~Tl~f)t'J~~'T`C7111~]T1:~ ii'T'l;~YT'1~. ~1~'11'T,~ ~~T .~<i}r ~~lle~~k:T~d~T~:~CYC°,~~'T`c'"ITO'dL~l'1~ ~1 ~G~1.tiTL~ ~4~~.C'Tdi1 ' ~.~~'.~ ~IWT" 1° r;~~Q~CT1 ~~,~T°ltl ~tiC[I11"~ ~~,.~~ ~.. ......A~ ..._.". ~.._.~ F'~11~1Te f~11~.91(~T'L L°~~~~~1~~ ~,~~ d'I~ ~1t.1~15 ~1~ ~''~(:~L1S ~a~.~ ~'ei~leT"~ ,. 1 ~. ~1~1'c"11"~' ~ ~° iw~ell"~1~1 . ~. kV ~M ~..lr~1 V''~' 9 J'tY,kJ' ~P A1Cel~t~l ~TSi~ ,... ~ y ,p~ ~y~,tiJ,4~~.~.~~M1J el~~ ~z~tl ~:~lacls -~~lii~~ `~1(l ,~~ ~J~as~la~.~~ - T~eue~l~el° l ,~M~~.. ~"~tt~la 1:..,~i~r~e `~~I~.C~I~ ;1:~n~_i;l~'~ ~ W Ct~cc~txat~er 1 '1"z C~'~l~ ~~ei~rl.s~e ~~ae~ ~.~ m~ J_~rt~T~ry ~ ~. L:~eebl~r ..~~.. ~r~~l~eec~ I~~t~e~~se ~~l .[~ J~T~~r 1 ~ ~:~elx~~° ~''m9 icy ;~.2z~h~Q2) City Qf Hutc~~n+~n ii•c~n.~•i i'criaa it 'h~ ~-c t~radr ~ Mrrrb~~• 54~ 1 - 1 ~~Uf,- Ml~r 1 ~fl ~ - ~~Q~ Ir~b~- l _ ~l~C~ M~r~~~~r~. ~~~1 _ t~f)f~ Cerm~er Ctr ~~ ~Te~:iZ~~cr ~attl tM;~u ~~~t-~~ '~t~~ C.~~+~~;a~~~a~. (:~r~_al~ It~i~t~ Malt L~iquc~r ~r"itl~ L~~~~s "+r~-'~1e ~txic~t~n ~~mgta~r L~c~ns C')n~~.1e nday ~~~t~aicatia~ 1Luur I..~~c~~ t"t~" alp; ~Tc~n-d~t~ic~tif7~ Malt T,vqur l~icr~ (~-I~ ~Tyn-~g~to~~:s~tirl~ Mazit Liy~rr Lac t~~-al ~~~~~t~xxati~~~ M ~3 ~ :~~~itsr L~: ~J~z~Sal~ Iactaxi~~t~ti~, u~~~ ~~r~~~~r 1:.,~r~~a ""~a~~ar Lquaar ~ie~ It~i~ti L~r~~~ Ir~~tiati~ra c~r~-I~~tcactia~ '~.q~cr~ Iravti,,~.t~~r~ ~'-f'C :~illllllllt~ __~_~ n ~~.~~ ;fl. (a~. ~. ,~t~a.t~ ,~Y0~.4~ $7.~~~ t~~.C~~ ~•C1 ~3,~~. l ~~,~~C ~1.~ 4~. ~~.!~ .~ `~'~.~ (~,t~ l.ll't'11~1' I),~ftia r~~ fl -~raz•clz 3 shri~ 1 - ~~~,~.~ ~ri,~ 1 - M ~ L ~~rril 1 _ I1v~~~°~~~ 31 ~ri~ 1 - M~~~ 3 Sri ~ 1 ~.:Ma~~ 3 r~9 1 - Ma~°1~ ~ ~. Apra ~' - M~rcl~ ~. ~pr~~ ~i .. Marc1~ ~ 1~:prm~ ~ - M~r~: ~ 1 May ], ~ i l ~ Mai 1 4 ,41 ~~~ '~"~~ CC;tir~c day T~"~r Dad 1 f~, Mai \~~tcti .. ~ .,..~~~...~. -..~t; ~~.fiundl cr~~~+ t~r~°~u~~{a&~Ie ~r r~~~:.~:.~r:~ 'i ~~' I-i~fi~hi~sa (~~4 ~~~%ra ~~~i l~r°ia~~in ~~rv~ce ~el~ hel~xal+ lllll~~'tii ~ ~{lAlkiti ~~,.~~.,~~~: ~~~~i~~~~~1~~~~,~~ ~~~-~ t~~G~, 1, :~~ .~~.~~ ~...~~~ __. n_ ~~ ~~~ ~~Iµ ~~1w~ ~~~~..~~: Z~IY~ir~;~ ~.~~ ~~~~ T4!~s~1Lld~.: IJAIAIt~I~~~'~~d11~1~~1~](~iti i~il)i1 °~~,~~ ~~Iw~1. .r~~ll~,:, ~~0~11~ .Tannin At'~d Z/~n~~, ~. ~ ~i~.~~ ~~;~~~'1. 11~1"w"'1S1dJT1 ~.3"1»~t"tIlI~~~S ~ . ~'~ ~"3CT ]~,~ ~wr~ ~arsx~a;~ a° r°~ar~~dc°z~ll~, 1e~r~~ ~~tt sr',~.~ifr`~°crsa~ c°eaTc~rc~~~, rr„at'ca~~rt~t`.s~ ("~rc:t'~~c~l c°c~°s~t d~ c;,py i~ ~~. '.1 ,~. en~,a~ rcty c~l~c~ ~`~~' cr~~"tl~ web ~r~ r~~ "ia*~ ~~~a~r~e r~ ~t c~?;~,~ err. ~,~,~~~ ~r r~r~i~aal ~c~. 1'~'l]lfin~ !~Char~~s yy ~'`'C..~~`~t ~._._._,_.,,..~__._ i, r''l't'.11[lllll>•lr /~.r~k~'F' j I ................. - . _ ,,rrry ~~,~,** ~~ ~~fL~~ e'1. ~ tlm ~,L,.:1LC1( ~: ~~~'i'G~ .,,.....F.._,.. "'$1d!.~.'.'~ @~'t'I~ ~) 1<.'~ ~S~F.~ {'f ~ I GI,~~ .J1. ~ ~. ~k ~N.....,~If~'~d'~.r~ ~ fl.. U' I~~~ ~.~. A 1 .V.J~' Lreal 1~~ ~`a~l~,d i (~1~~° t~fitit~ 1. i C~ ~~ ~~e $1,~~ Taal ter "1'a~lr~l~ ~e ~°C"~al~~~ .3{~ r ~ ~~.~~~~ ~~ ~ ..... °' t ~~ ~~~Irk~" SYYtGd~~ d~ (7r~t'YR ~ x}?~7? ti J' ~ .~ e~ ~ '. ~ E~~ ~7~'C~ ~ ~ _ ... ~7'. ......~... // yy ~A t~ 4 l ~4' ~~ ~~~CEG 1 ~IC~P~d~ p~ ~.~~} ~ ~~ ~~ .Q~ ~ •D y~Y g~ ~ . [_'1 1 .[" ~C7~N ~~~1~'d~l~.:~ 3 V 1~~,k~tJ' .~d"~.~,' ~p Q~ 7 /y~y ~ti k 4b.'s'.J .I r.~ 7 y y 7 ' ~ CI'1~ 1 c"1'~~rG ~"C~.I..4.~~I14~ LV rlw 1~T~ ~C~L~L'~d" { ~ ~'+ .~Y~.i' * ~'rev~r~u~ ~c~d~ rx~t` ~°aoa~r ~r~t~l I~~a~~t -- .~ fcr1 ~,r~rrat`ir~ lat ~:l~r°s ncad ~r~~v~ . 1 ~a~,r~r ra~a~~rra;!r~, 1/4 ~al~a~"r° ir~~M~rn~at~° ~~~~~~~~M Iyp^~11 pn Mpy pY.,~. ~._..~~t ~y ~~`~,,,~ g~~y p, pry ~V p ~yy~W„~µ„wwp., q y y~.~... ~y ,t _..,._,. ~A, A~1~ '"...,{7tl Y..~~Lk.?"N/d ~4~ ~~iL F ~ ~_il ~.\~' 1Y4 ~~}'~~.. h ~ dLN'l#0.14w~W~ WA~AN~.'i Lt~~ll ~~ ~L 1_I~:l~l 1. ' ~~'~"~'7°] N~~~T1'~,e~~ 6~1"~r~Mt~'lr; f ~ r ~~, i:?, { ,Fl ~ ~,' 1 !.,~:1.~~~~~'~~~ 9C~t'1'4::1 G~~ ~~~~ ~ d,s ~. , i ~: ~; ~ ~ - r.~ m m ~ : ...__.~..m _~_ MMM~..,,.~,~..~~,. ,~.~. ]"Iy'i.~~1'f'r"~~1 a~ir~n ~~y ~` Hutc~uins~~at~ ~~~4 P~~r~nin~ aa~d ~~~c~ ~.Ts ~" ~~h~~l~u~l+e Je't' ~.., ~1 ors ~ ~ ~°rr. ~c~~ ~~~aatt ~f ~tr~~~, ~.~1~~!, t° t~~~tt~~t~t ~'5. ,~,.ry~ ~~ 1.Q~ l~~s, ~~°~:;,~ct~ra~ ~,t ~Ni~ ~ailll~'lt'. ~ta~ Tc~ ~^~irti~'~ 1,~C~ ~C,~''P}"tlrt~.~t)(rri7':', "~~'~.~~5 rt le~trt ..~~~~,s l~.~ r°c~~r;r~°ca°in?; 'L~~ ~~t (1'~It.al~~1~ '~.rr~~l, ~.~c~tt~r~~t:r~:~i~sl, t~du~tr~l~ `~5,~~ crc~~r~n~.~°t~~~~~~, 14~.C) I~,~ad ~e~,~ ~'~~r~n~~ tt~i ~l~~taat~ ~ ".DAD ~'l~s ~~~a^dfn ~~ 1 . ~. _.,.n~__~ .. ~.~ ~c~ ~e~c~r~xrr~".~~'e.~ ~1u~ ~.4~ p~~° l~t~ T~~terrrti~~d Day t~ta~ tro.tt~~~~a far tt. ~J~,t . ~~ ~~~1 ~~~~~]~~~~iic~l~ ~'r ~~ri~,~ car e~~~t~~t~~,r~t~ ~~w,~ ~prt~s ~~a~t ~ ~~y k.~~r~rt~ 1~ 7 a. °Thi~ atx~~.rtzt ~:Du t,~D~li~. e~rit~~ j1tdil.llls~ ~f~S~ ~'~~TI~.J.r~ T"~f_1~1-~11C~11~ 1'1~"t'11Yr~;;'~~C~'1.~; 15~„t~1St.t~,tl.~'~att~~ t~l~ ~s~lkt~ 4: \1I~I', ~1~t"' 1' rlt.`;, ~l~lriY'. t~s f~a~ the ~",nr.rnt t.c. ~~iy ~# ~-lulct~ir~~~t~. 2fi)~4 P~~~~e~ Tl~a~a~trr~~e~zd~ Fie rch~dx~~e r- - _ ----- --- - - - ~- - ' I c- (~~~c~ ~~ l~te _1rnc,-rrrt .. ~ . ~.. - __ --- _ - _.._. ~1•r: s ~w~fal ~ ~ t~ r~t~~ P~~ I ~~ l~~id~~i~1 1~.~~ ~~1~:a- ri~t~~~x ~irtt~ic~x~ial ~ .f~ a'~~~x in-ah l~tt~~:~~~~ ~ .~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~'1,nial ~:..iicr~~s q~,at ~' 7.~0 ,Arn~ina~ In~~rwtti ,~nn ..C~[~ nitxa~l ~it~t~~n~~ic;1~r~tt~ ~" l.C~.f~~l l t"a~r~ ~~~.~ ~r~~ctia :~"a°it~tcaut ~.~~[~ rratat "e~~~ ~,zcz~ rz~:~~~i~za rn~tt~ ~. "eh~~l~ ~nrz~utid 'tire 1 /~r ~~ta ~rc~~rec~ Br~~t~~ ~'~1 ] 4~,~4~ l week ~~r~er ~`ra'r~ir- ~, e~ I ~l.~e ~~ c~p~es 1~.~~~J P"~lee Ser~vee ~~°~"~t~a~r~ 2~ ~~. ~. ~' :.~fJ P4~ItlC~ ,2~a~ ~1~ p ~1~~~liCl~~l~1. T~rs~ l~eea~t~!~~ . ~a~~an.~a~~t~r ~~~~~~~n ~~~ ~' ~chda~le ~ti~--u 11- ~;~x~~-~~~wlA~~1 i wtie. ,_ - _ __ ~~Mmm.. ~~r,rr-~' 1~'ti~ its ~I tr 1ni~-unE ~; .~.~w'~ ~'GC - - ., ~ _ - ---- ~c~~pti~_ l'. .. , ~1i.•~i ~ ~_~ -,~:~ I~pt° se5s1~`~r4 ~~, °C-l~~~lrk5asul~~~1~ ~"~~r~~,c-~~~z-w,~"~c F~rz ~r~rc~c~,~~ .~(} 1 ~~~,si~,rr~ ~~~ , i~l i~1~a~~ ~1~"a~~~ ~.l~~r°th (.~'F•~1«r~~,) 4~. 4 ~~~ra~s F~~s~t~~~'I (w'~~c~~a~ ®,~"'rfr~1 ~ac~~~~ ~.4~ ~~ ~~s~sicrr~, ~~tbail lE~"l~ f~. ~ 7 ~es~i~ans +~~rls a~ll~~~t~~ ~~.~~G~ s~~~+~n~ ~c~~vnln~~t~~s (.~~s -1~~ __ . ~.t~ si+~ns ~.~~-~lta 4~.~~k l s~ssttc~~« ~xnd~y.~r~etc~ ~~ 1~& ~~si;ra; C)~r~ ~tir~~; P~ ~Lld~,Cll$5?'tia~rltClt'~ ~5. r~~.l~tS ~,.~ ~,~' ~'~t"-1~tf;'S ~,~'~ ~'~7~17 ~~L111~ ~.~ ~~...~_..~_~~ ~ ~~~. ~yUt]t~~~V ..~ ,~~~ fit" ~'c~ld$~1...~~I" CI~/.~.~.._~ _ . ~~i-1~-~~ ~~t~~lr ~a,~.(~ ~~er ~i~~il~t~~ ~v~i-nt~t~n ~a~~s U.~U 1~ 1~~~t~ ~~7~~~n ~~~~ ~ far ~r~~~~rta. pz° ~ia~° E~~~~ ~~ ~"~~r~ily° ~~~ur" ....~ '"h~Ilt11 F'aCl`ae .~C~ 5. ~r ~m~~. ~~' S+"~T]Ct ~ 7t1~i11~?er.3 ~.Q'~ ~.~)~ ?I1~I11})ti:lti ~~ M~.~,~,~.,w,~ o ~„ ,,,~„~.,~,~ ,W..,.. ~,,, ~9 I7'~~1T7~?~t",5 ~.~~ ~ S,~'~ '~l' [)~ ~~1~~~11I1S~71 2~b~4 ~"++~ haulc• alucy ~.e 8f~D Ault '~pc~~•~s ti~~~~r t~':lcliti its ~~~ ~ I~rti~ .1nI~~tlnt ~ . "(tip"~ ~ ~~a~~ ~~~~r'`~~'I]~5 ~iiS~Ct~7,,~~1 _. ~~~.~'{~ ~ j~'s~I',~r".1L~11~ ~~~' LCc1II?~ `~rc~~~~a fall ~~r`a~ap~~~~~1,~~~zrc~,s,~ '~.["~(:l r~r ~~ ~-r te~rr~ "-I~. ~.C.~f~ der ~~~~]~ der a~ ,. .t~~Q ~r ~n~tch S~~r team ~+~ ~~'.~~ far t~, t~n ~~ m~7at~~i °~.'1~ ~`~QI'r~~**~+ w-~~' ~}~'.~" ]1~~`:w,Cbl~ IuT l~'c7."~1 City ~f ~~t~ch~tC~c~~ ~~~4 Fee ~~heciu~e +Clfh+er Feet tii-rur#~~:1rti~it~ ~'salwc~ ~.~(~~ ~'u"~tc~~. ear, F~leCee 1 .+~~ lay ltc~r° r~ ~c~ ~ atmr~pa 1 gar der day lea~he~-s ~ 2~.+~C~ der r~s l~itas: ~1"s~l~ p ~1~^V1~~~ ,:-~~~ 1°~?~t~G3'I, 1WId~~ 13'8CJ1~'~' tt7r,~tr+ ~ ~ 1(~.~){1 tlal~ ~al~~ta~~e '~' i~'t7a l~a~ly ~rl C1fi"' ~ 1?~~" ~'~~""~~rYl T1 '~r. C1C9 ~_.~ ~ _.....A_~~ la ~" l~~~a ~~'.~ ~T" ~~a"~7~'1. l~cle~~~° 1~1~!~''CC~ll~1L` C`z.l 1.[10 lair elaald. F~r~al k.00 der lr~l ~~~~: l~l~y~a~aa~l ~~~~ ~~ lee Ger~~e~ anc~ ivie. .ran (dry flc~c~~ t t~191~ ~^~ s ( 1, C9 ~ ` ~ ~ r da s gq 1 ,,,~~,...,,,~.~M~. .. ppyy ryqry~~ q 11pp'1/ ryry11, p / y Iy A~l~iti~~~l ~'~a ~0.4~f) #a~:la ~~~i~ii~:i~ Kraal ~rtlt $50.00 r° lake ~'o~ut1~ $~~. err l~~r ~~ ~~rat~r ~,,.~~~, ... "~lle~r~all t~l ~ $1.00 ~~~r eraaz~`t der ~~° ~,~.~-irlii~l~r~ 1''~~rl .~,.µ. .~~ ~~~r h~r.~r ~~...w.~~ .~...... l~e~lay ~.~.~.~ M 15.x}0 ~~er laer~r i~vr~c rrr~ra ~~~. tc~ ~~ (.~C# _ ,~J'G~~' Yet ~crt~~ 100.00 }~cr° l~~~ar~ .~.~ ,,. '~~0.00 aaaa° lie ~10~).00 lae~ lar~aar° l~a~b~~t~ l~arl~: "~"a1:. ~ .sat ~"r~~ast~rs 'aaae~l~at~ta T.,~,t~ 1~c~,. - 'T :. ,. E 1~~~ r°~m 1`~l'~~a~.t~:urz~l~l~l~~ 1~ r ~' X2.00 lava ~a~~ua a~a~ alas "".~tiCl ~~ret~l ta.-rrr r~ ~~ ~ , 8 ~;~1t~ ~Hr.~#~1~~~a~m ~~4 ~~Y~k ~~'~te~ ~'"~~~ra~ha~~~ ~ S~~eclwY~ I'cr 1'~ ~~t- T_~~~~~~ ~.~ 1~ ~ I~;~~~ ~~ ~~tai. ~~t~~ c~~ 1~11ti{! 1~"~~~t ~~x 1~~ata~ :~; ... _- L ~t~ 1in~~uni _,,. ,~ __ 4~1.~"1C~ ~L~~t ~~ a~r~~t~~a~n~d 1 ~r ~~r ~'r~r I.~-~.~~~ ~'~~ _ ~~~at~ r1~, F~~l~:d ley ~C.ity t~"f ~.(~f~ l'c~- r:~cf. - ~~a~d,~C~~y ~~.~ ~., Fii.~r~z~~ "ills ~~.C~ ]Z~: f ~ir~ 5 t~s pli . l &yraid~;yr ~.'??,1«1(31 +~~~ ~f 1-~~~ehinon d~~4 P~rarr~~in~ P~e~-itn>t ~~t etlr ~" ~r~he~rill+~ ~~i+r~i~~r- tiii.e y1 d"'g 1 Aar ~~r .~~ ~~7t1'~~7f?l~~'lC~ '~ ~LAt"~?4~ °' CiTr1~tiC~1.lT`i "" '~:'ur•k~~ ~~" ~'1~,$`Ck ra ~7~"11~r~Ltl"D,G~ "ua-i _ _ _. ?{Ni{1 I' ~~~~ lruuu sst yyy~~F,x~~:~?. ~,~ .p~.1~~ 'i~~417.1~1~ ~. ~~ ~'ai.~/~1~.~1 "i,"1~.~11{ ~a~,'{~ ?1111-1 I{z-• :lsirrrtitlt 1~~.M~.t}C1 ~1.i,(.1 ~AJ~.~V' ~ ,~~' i~.f~f.~ ~,~. 1,C3.C~fi ~~1~~~.~ ,,~,1~ All ta~t~r t•c~~~d~a v~r~th ~rrt7e~~ot~s r i7at~~s. ~ `~'~°~T~t"T~t~~4~xtrnz~rt~~tf"~~~ rya/cl~~~~a~v, •~~ ~~;~~_,~ti.~ryt i'~~= ~iai~.l:i~ti~arr i itrr~ ter rt~~aurt' ~ter~ .~ ~~~~ ~~"~~7 1.fi~ ,Q~ ~~.~~ ~~. ~, ~~ ~', 3~ i C~.'~ ~~~.~~~°~~~..r~.ztx~ B'~1tCS)r ~ l'7 ~~t~ ~ ~~utc~n~n ~~4 ~~t~r °~'uru~~~Jn ~~"~ ~ec~u Fee'I~~jir _..__ _ __ - __-_. ~i~ic linni~nt~'' - ~ _ _ _ ~ ; • ~ ,, ~L'~.C!1~17JCC 1 ') ~~~i-~l1~ i~ h ~..- ld,.l`a ;n ,~ ~..,}lti~'i)1l.Tlt t !t'l.~ ,ii' .~ ~, I~Y~L~- ;~ .,a .~ •. ~c"l~ ~ 1 "~.'~J'u '~a~i~c ~L~i.~~...~~:ti~ ~. ~a:l . ia.,:"~.lt~~ ~-I~xu~-. ~,'>"~e~~cta~~. a~~c:~ ...~l.ic~u~~a:~ ~,.(~~? RESOLUTION NO. 12346 RESOLUTION APPI20VING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TIIF IIUTCHNISON POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONSTRUCT A STORAGE FACILITY ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 127-1sr AVE. S.W. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS The Hutchinson Police Department, applicant, has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a storage facility to be located at 127-1"Ave. S. W. A Conditional Use Permit is needed according to Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance which states; " Any ofthe following uses in any district: buildings, facilities or premises of public service corporations to be used fox public utility purposes reasonably necessary to the public convenience or welfare" require a Conditional Use Permit. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East half of lots 6 and 7, Block 9 South '/z City of Hutchinson 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupanis of the surrounding lands, existing and anherpatcd traffic condiiions, and the effect on values ofproperties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met. CONCLUSION The City Counci] hereby approves the conditional use permit with the fallowing conditions: 1. A flammable waste trap must be installed. 2. The building must have a separate water meter. 3. Drawing #1 site plan should be followed. 4. The building shall have gutters installed on the west side of the building tv better facilitate drainage. 5. The parking lot must be paved by the time a certificate of occupancy is issued £or the building. 6. Lf future additions to the building are made, a conditional use process would again be required. 7. The Police Department must work with the homeowner to the west io provide screening from his property. Adopted by the City Council this 24`h day of February, 2004. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor ~L.b~ ~} Hutchinson City Center C~ mEMORANDUM 111 Hassan Street 3E Hptchinspn, MN 55350-2522 320.587.5157/Faz 320.234424v DATE: February 19, 2004 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUSETED BY THE HUTCIIINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONSTRUCT' A STORAGE FAC1L1'FY ON PRDPERTY LOCATEll AT 127-1sT AVE SW Pursuant to Section 6.07 of 7vning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use pemlit. HISTORY Hutchinson Police Department, applicant, City of Hutchinson, property owner, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a storage facility on 127 -1" Ave SW. A Conditional Usc Permit is needed according to Section 6 of the Zoning Ordinance which states; " Any of the Following uses itt any district: buildings, facilities or premises of public servicc corporations to be used for public utility purposes reasonably necessary to the public convenience or welfare" require a Conditional Use Permit FINDING P PACT 1. The required application was submitted. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published un the Hutchinson Leader on Febmary 5, 2004. 3. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request. 4. The proposed building is 3, 855 square feet. The building will be used for evidence storage, storage of various emergency servicc vehicles, and minor maintenance of items. The Conditional Use section of the code provides for this type of use. The structure is very large and staffhas previously requested the building have more aesthetic qualities to better fit with the existing neighborhood. The building will have "nova-brick" placed on the street side as well as the east side. 5. Drainage on the site moves from the west to the cast quite drastically (1062.9 to 1054.98). There is catch basin in the alley area which will capture the additional run-off from the building. The City Engineer has reviewed the drainage and is confident the existing drainage patterns will be maintained and be directed into the City storm sewer system. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Conmrission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. A flammable waste trap must be installed. 2. The building must have a separate water meter. 3. 17rawing #1 site plan should be followed. 4. The building shall have gutters installed on the west side of the building to better facilitate drainage. 5. The parking lot must be paved by the three a certificate of occupancy is issued for the building. 6. If future additions to the building are made, a conditional use process would again be required. 7. The Police Department must work with the homeowner to the west to provide screening from his property. espectfully s tt ~~ Dean Kirehoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Tvm Cifferson, Hutchinson Police Dept. p~npd oe recycled paper - CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., John Webster, John plson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schpobrich, Marc Sebora, Cary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dave F.rlandson, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischuack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz I]ate: February 5, 2004 -Meeting Date: February 17, 2004 Applicant: City of Hutchinson Police Department, applicant VARIANCE Brief Description Hutchinson Police Department, applicant, City of Hutchinson, property owner, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit. The height (18') does meet the requirements m the C3 district and will nut require a variance.(as notified in the newspaper) A Conditional Use Permit is needed accordtng to Section (i o}'the Zoning Ordinance which states; "Any of the following uses in any districC: buildings, facilities or premises of public service corporations to be used for public utility purposes reasonably necessary to the public convenience or welfaze" require a Condttional IJse 'errmt. GENERAL 11vFOR1vIATTON Existing Zoning: C3 (Central Commercial) Property Location: 127-1°t Ave SW Lat Sire: 65.9' X 131.5' Approximately 0.2 acres Existing i.and Use: Vacant Adjacent i,and Use And Zoning: Surrounded by C3, however there are existing residential homes to the south, west and north (:omprehensive Land Use Plan: Downtown Commercial Zoning History: A Conditional Use Permit was granted in July, 2002 to move a house off the lot and the lot has been vacant since that time. Applicable Regulations: Section G.07 of the Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: 1'~ Ave SW Conditional Use Permit Hutchinson Police Dept. Planning Commission- February 17, 2004 . Page 2 Parking: There are no regulations that specifically address this type of use for parking standards. In a warehouse situation, one space for every 2,000 square feet is required. Analysis and Recommendation: The proposed building is 3,855 square feet. The building will be used for evidence storage, storage of various emergency service vehicles, and minor maintenance of items. The Conditional Use section of the code provides for this type of use. The stnacture is very large and staff has previously requested the building have more aesthetic qualities to better fit with the existing neighborhood. The building will have "nova-brick" placed on the street side as well as the east side. There are two building placement options (see drawings 1 and 2). The Police Department has communicated with the neighbors and have discussed the large elm on the northwestern portion of the property. There is a divided opinion about whether it is worthwhile to save the tree. One homeowner feels it provides a lot of shade, although another neighbor feels it has a lot of dead branches and probably should he removed. In any case, the Forester has reviewed the site and the elm tree will be more expensive to remove at a later time, unless the building is moved to the southern property line, which would then impact the two maple trees. Drainage on the site moves from the west to the cast quite drastically (1062.9 to 1054.98). There is catch basin in the alley area which will capture the additional mn-off from the building. The City Engineer has reviewed the drainage and is confident the existing drainage patterns will be maintained and he directed into the City storm sewer system. The Planning Staff discussed the construction process; issues with the weapons cleaning room, snow removal concerns and metering of the building. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions: 1. A flammable waste trap must be installed. 2. The building must have a separate water meter. 3. Drawing #2 site plan should be followed and leave the elm on the property (with some trimming to occur prior to construction), 4. The building shall have gutters installed on the west side of the building to better facilitate drainage. 5. The parking lot must he paved by the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for the building. 6. If future additions ro the building are made, a conditional use process would again he required. Cc: Hutchinson Police Department -Tom Gifferson I '~' - ~yypgpp ~z "~~` r~.51 CERTIFICATE OF SUR FOR . sa.a j : f HUTCHINSON Pfl~ICE DEPARTMENT I $ ~ ~ ~ i l ~ ~9P ..mot ~ u~:ln I x~~* DESCREPTIDN PRDVIDED 1 ]t `ZY fTb ~R.: ~ P.~,r~, ~ 51.98 I F ~ East Halt of Lat 5 and East Half of Lvr 7, r ~ ~ ' ' ~ `jam l3AT Block 9. SOUTH HALF OF HUTCHINSDN. s ~.9 J ~ o e L BLOCK 3 r 9 .~,°`' W . ~ ;" 7 ~ `. ~ o a ~ I O ~ ~ ;o ~ 4 ' ' ~ I fV 0 G >-- ~ I I 5 T.fi ..1 x.re svh e 1E ~, ~' ~ l ~,.4 61 V TI i/CAYY i~a -~G 33'., n ~ [1116 i ay 'e puner e6w Z i Gso o C E I O o 10 20 40 ~ (~ 1 8 a Wa 'r ~ I ,c~ ept~ stole in /eey Fo 6 Jh 3Sa3 e c ]&5 ~ ~, 41,E I 16.76 `~.~ JF 5 O Derc[es TPn monument IP~XIA ~ 51.29 I 0 ,~ [ ~ ` ; se O Dmmas Imn mpnurren I ~ +60.1 ~ ~ rbor Ihl• 96rveY~ Plon or F Mr•b} [art Ily y~i I „p'L~~~ J ~y 1iy~ l'~ ~ ~ a Rsporr Vas O}ep reJ hY lee Or unEx ry direct eePelY lsl Oe OIIE 160i I OT G EY Iy IlCenf eC r ~l f t' ~ ol un01r tll• loe> er IM1e Srole <I e S L . I on vr re r I RTES` i~CaE4~ ~B3M I T,N Tr to e4D d. i.'R H J e}fr ey R Rauech q~ '8+ M~ [entnv e1tT el.ie ~$ ~~ $ Pefarol Y Bali ypn alt e&4 pate: C I r. lo. <u10 & gurlx 71AE 7aif wrb 8 ylrx FIRST AVENUE SW 1`- 1 ~~~~G ~ 1 BK Y-31~ PG IS PELLINEH INlO SIIRYEYNlG HUTLFR60N MN JCB N0. 07228 r r \~ I ,~ 5~r i ffi ~ nT~'.a~lus CERTIFICATE OF SURV~ FOR IN?oL.,~~ HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT { a `~ ~ ^ sL~YI~~~ 3 4----------'- ----' sas 9 ....~ J --~~-----~~ --~ es.sr ~ ~ ~ „~+^ DESCRkPTIQN PROVkDED !rb 5S[ arm ~~ [} { f a Easi Half of Lot 6 and East Half of Lot 7, ' 7 , -~ ~ J ~!.~'[ a ~ flock 9, SQUTH 1-L4LF OF HUTCH13dSOhF. l azs L-r~ J ~ Q°c w ~• Lu ~ 'C>~ ~= 7 o a 50`~ ~J rq ~~ ~ ~~ i e 50~ S ~ ! rl .c~asa rrtvse ~G 1 sl _ __-_ r _ __-__-_ _____-._ y ~ " ..case __-__-~ ~_______ Mp 4 rasa cab a ymvr '~ u,a t stole in fear ~g :~ ~ l ; J~Q 3G.3 3B~ '~A4 ~`~ ~ ~C~ cJ O prrwtss bon monuecnr bard 1 e ~--ll $ ']Y.>g 0 O Pena>as ian mynumen aet stl ` ~?y s ,,J~ f>bx ~}%~+ y~~ ~ 1 R Pon bYar~Pr Por ~E Op1~P~1vy3ayn Ear ny dirrn ~~~ ~ J P`ry •yggrY if Ian ana IAe1 1 m a salt II[Ynr ra 11q 65.93 `~ L^~ `~ NlnnnotacYar yn6v ens lo>.a of rep Sry+a of r------_ __--_-_- 2 R.STR----_ M1'6~__. 1 Y JF6.T3 rr Mk ~ i.y M Jcflrq P Poua cM1 •t 'd+ ~ pn¢cre ~~ ArB~1a ~~ Ootr' Lr[. Hs. 6yll ~I,Ti ~ ~ 911T T.16 MY Y - cuo S ysrrr iM ee.>•1 wMD 6 qunv FIRST AVENUE SW PIIiSEH LANG 9u[yEYVxi NS(CFlI6ON NN JOB e70. W22B ~RRk;, n G ~Z BN P-315 PG I ~Y'a~ ~,ng ~ a- r C~ 32 ~* I ndicates prvpert~ described in the notice 2 31 wwsreroGZOH 30 2 44 36 40 4 10 146 z 15 15 lq ~ .~~, 21 10 c~ 1 28 50 45 12 3 44 127 ~a asr x 115 z 31 10 13 loo 125 135 oz Feet 0 5 4 4 3 146 45 a~vo ~' -, I~~ ~.JJJ I III~4 °'~ ~~ _~ , ~~ , ,,' ~~. , ~ I;;~ .. ~ ~_, ~ .._- i I ~~ J ~ _ ie 4 a ~ ,~~L I ~L1_T]l~'L I ~ ~~~ry~ ~~~: J ~ ~, ~ ~ 4 '~+ I-I =~~7~~~J-1J i ~ I `1 ~ .~ 1 ~' I I 4 7 I I _~~ ~ ~ y I .I If ~ J a~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ I~ I I u ~~~ ~. Ii ~ ~ ~ ~d~ NII~I " n ~i~~~- ~ ~~_ N , ~ ~ a_~~ I a~ ~ ~ j I u I I ~ I i I e ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~V aj--~~ ;rte ~ ~ i i ~ ' ~ I I ~ I ! ° ~~ i , 1 7 ]~~-~ r ~ti._ LI E i~ L I l rl; _ I~. ~ j, - I ~ 114 I I. ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-~ ~ -_ ' ~~ " ~ ~i " I N a I.I 'i III ~ ~, ~- .. +~' ... I ~-~ ~_77_Y-7 ~ ~~ $~ ~ I I I i ~ I I~ ~ ~ i - ~J ~f ~a~-1. _1 ~1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ w . . ~~~ ~~_ ~ e ~~ I Iii {~:~ j~{~i~ ~i.l ~~ ~ i~~ le I ~~~F~`a Sf{~1~ f ii ~. ~~ ~ ~ III i} ~~i l~ i ~.I ~ ' I ~~., ~~ ~` ~ 11 [ ~ L f I I ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ' ~ ~~~~~~ 1- 1 I III 1i I ~ '..{}-{~~~ X ~~~~~ ~ ~ }~l 1 ~~ li~ i I ill' ~i ~I~~ I I I ~ ~ ~~ 7- a ~ a ~-'~~ '~~ ~ it _ !I li ~ f y ~~,~ L~"~~}~r~l ~iI~i~~ ~ +.I I~.I ~ ~. ,,i I d, ~~~)=f ~'r- _ ' '~ III ill r '~1 I I ~ tl' h ~:m~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~k~i i ~~~iE I ~~ ~~ ' it I ~~_, I I II ~F~ f .~~~ `~ ~i~i 1i ~ ~ ~, .~ 111' ~ j,~l: 1~ ~ ~ ~~ i ' i ~ 1 ~A, ~ , '~T-i .tom I- I 1,4~ i~ 1 f ~iil I ~ I~ E~x 6 ~~ 1 ~, + I ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~7 ~ p'~.i ~i' ~i~'y'], ~ I ~~. ~. ~iil~i,~iillii: Illiill,l I~~,,;, ~M~4 k .. ... .. .~, .~. . ~ •k 1 ~ ,I I ,. I V Y d ~ . I I I I IX .' .. 0 ~ ,~ .~ {° {~ . - ~ ~' i ~ ~ _~ ._ , ~: ~: :~ ~; ,~; ~~ ... -- ~N~~~~~r~ ~+w~ EE: y~+ ,- ,f- ..~ NSN iNlMth r Ei, 8 [N ,,.•^ ,f,°'. Vo;k". "~=ANIF, FiAf1F- i RUi;~S,,~ N...•~" .... _ ~ ~~m„, ~,. ~'" .~...•~~.-w ......--.. _..~ ... ~~~ .,r'' _ ..~.~.....~_ .-. a-.w.~~., ~~I F r. ~.-4f11'; I Y,~ .... ~ .W.`.,,~~. x { - yJ ~~:: ~^ T p ~I ~~ N I r4 ~ 1 _.... ~+ ~ '; '~ p _ _r. ........__`......~_ _.__ ~ ..~~~mm _ - ~ _ .~ .~~ w. ~ ~_mm ~ ~. ..a ~ ..~ ~, ~ ~.>~. ~' . ~~~~~,,~,~ ~,~~.~.o ~ .. Ems..,.. ~,; L..~.. ._. .. ~_ •~ ~. u r r~n,4,E V li v!~. ~... ~ '., ,~ _ l m. o ~ _.. m _ 'i __ .. _- 'dYn "8'o-, E11 f11M P,Afc ...,; „r~. ..... - - e r ~ ... _ .. ~ t Il - Fl-0IiRIG .~.4t ._ 9 f F ik-I-0 n Flt: kl-L iM~.. dY MpJ ~:: i21 ,r31H eE3i rr{,[ ~ _ '. ~ fi~E JFItE.~}_ _ ~, .. ,~ IJ I . 1 «RAI~F ~ _ _ , . I _. .. ', o4iF~ ~C, ~'G r" . .._, ~ "" I ~: ~, ;~,.~. ~.~SG~Y ~elr d.. .. XX ISM! - . i~ ,.. i I t ` f as �s r FLOOR PLAN 3855.F T. TOTAL MaE STORAGE A _ BIKES Rte L - I € - sow _ _ FIRE PT. TRAM `- Et4ER Y 1€ S TIER. 35 KW GENERATOR VENKLE MA NT RA _ _ e_ - €41'fsaPar - - v _ - � _'. -. s•€= t _,�. -. _ .,. a ,-: °� '- I t ` f as �s r FLOOR PLAN 3855.F T. TOTAL • • s PROPOSED POLICE GARAGE on first avenue has two maples in front and a large cottonwood in bade Their site plan shows the building set back from the street sidewalk area. To provide a more cohesive streetscape, I would like them to pull the building forward (to the south}. I would like to know your thoughts regarding the vitality or the impact that you would see for tins project Impact: The residential assimilation of what is basicafty going to be a garage into that neighborhood will not be enhanced by the removal of the two maple trees to the south. There is a way to help the site. We could put same nice new trees into the boulevard area, as the two existing boulevard trees are not in the greatest shape as they stand now. I spoke with Bob Loehrer HPD, as to how the building is set and he indicated that the building will be set as far north [like on the line? ] as it can be, which means that the size of the structure will be to close to the maples on the south to keep them. They must be removed. lklso, the cottonwood tree is a huge elm tree that, if the building is bunt and the elm tree succumbs to Dutch elm disease and has to be removed, it will be beyond my capabilities to aooomplish that. I would guess that it would be a $3,50[!.00 to $4,000,00 job to remove that tree around and over a building. So, that tree has to be removed also. Progress is wonderful. t, cry ^1 ~ ~r~ • MEMORANDUM POLICE ~ EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Lt. David Erlandson, Interim Chief ~~ C- DATE: February 18, 2004 FtE: Police Storage Facility Hutchinson Police Services is seeking council approval for a conditional use permit at your regular scheduled meeting of February 24, 2004. Upon your approval, we would begin the process of obtaining the necessary bids far the construction project. The tentative timeline for the project to begin would be set for mid April with an estimated completion date of late June. This timeline refers to the major construction phase and is dependant upon the weather cooperating. In an effort to save taxpayers money, Sgt. Tvm Gifferson will serve as the general contractor and our department, as well as the parks department, will be supplying same of the labor for the project. However, there will 6e 8 need to subcontract the major components of the project. We will be submitting the applicable purchase orders for the cost of materials and labor irt.the future. On a related subject, we would also tike to possibly combine our proposed generator update with the storage facility project. The actual cost and details of how this could be accomplished have not been worked Put yet. I thought you should be aware of this idea because I believe the timing would be appropriate. Sgt. Gifferson and I will be attending the council meeting in the event you have arty questions. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration in this matter. `. . llkg 2004-01-0002 .;' ` C~ ~,~ Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION :t ,. .... ~~ 444 Cedar St., Sui[e 133, St. Paul, MN 55101.5133 ,,, (651) 296-6439 TTY (651) 282-(1555 - q,~~ www.dpsstate.mn.us/alcgamb/alcgamb.html ,tt~ - RENEWAL OF CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY PERMIT Permit Fee $15D (Renewal Date: April 1) MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TD: ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 13797 Little Crow Hutch Bnwl 1.150 Hwy 7 Hutchinson, PUBLIC Bowling Lanes Tnc. W/Box X03 MN 55350 IF NAME AND ADDRE55 SHOWN ARE 1VOT CORRECT, MAKE CHANGES BELOW Worker's Comp Ins. Co. ~'~"a{C ~TA-fY~ u:~Pvlicy No. IUD 47'~~'mPolicy Period `7 3 i D City/County where permit approved: Permit Name: L I ~,~~ ~ l l ~ ~~ Trade Name: ¢~-u~ ~~ Location address: ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ B>7 K ~ 3 City, State, ZIP Code: c~-u,{--t,h 1 !'\SD Yl }~ ~ rJ~~ Rosiness Phone: ~ ~~'D 5 ~ ~ -a,7J s Ry signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership, corporate officers, bylaws, membership, partners, home addresses, or telephone numbers. if changes have occurred dozing the past l2 months, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. A lie n this renewal a t re or ill result in Cne . 1. Applicant confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/enunty in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below, 2. Applicant confnms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked far any liquor law vivlatiorv (state of local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Applicant confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, pleatie give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Applicant confirms that Workers Compensation insurance rs in effect for the full license period. 5. Applicaut confirms, no club on-sale 6. Applicant confirms busines ~ rpmi Y~e Applicant Signature_.~,/ l /~-___- `___'/ ~ (Signature certifies all above information to liquor license is held. any other business establishment. K--~- Date S r v correct and permit has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/Cvunty Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that a consumption and display permit has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) P509097 (01/00) Amount Received C~ Hutchinson Area Health Care .Fiiutcbinsan Commun4ty lY'os,~ttal Kr~ncti~Murtur Nulsi~i,q !lor~:e ChtA~~cl Meclicul Cettfer ]095 Fligha'ay 15 South Hwchinson, MN 55350 (320) 234.5000 February 18, 2004 'fhe Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and Members of the City Council Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members: The Board of Directors of the Hutchinson Area Health Care (HAIIC), as part of their regular meeting nn February 17, 2004, considered two items which require your approval. The following is a draft excerpt from the minutes of the meeting. "Microbiolo 5 stem Aual zer, The Board received a Capital Expenditure request for the purchase for a replacement Microbiology Analyzer with a Data Management System. The current equipment lease will expire in March. The proposed new system includes the LabPro Information Manager. Staff presented a detailed financial analysis to the board for consideration and justification of purchase of the equipment. The equipment is available through the hospital's group purchasing organization (Novation) at a cost of $fi9,900. Following discussion, Ristau made a motion, seconded by McGinnis, to request approval from the City Council to authorize the purchase of a WalkAway 40 SI System Microbiology Analyzer with LabPro Data Management System at a cost of $69,900. All were in Favor. Motion carried. The second item for your consideration is a recommendation to you to consider changing the terms for the appointed Governing Board members of Hutchinson Area Health Care. The charter for the City of Hutchinson was amended last year which provided for five year terms for Hutchinson Area IIealth Care beard members. "Board Member Terms Snapp presented a chart to the board which proposed changes in the length of terms so that only one member from the appointed board would need to be selected in a given year. Graves had met with Marc Sebora, City Attorrrey, regarding the amendment in the charter in 2003 in which a section regarding terms of Hutchinson Area Health Carc Board Members, changed to five The FIonorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and Members of the City Council Yage two February 18, 2004 years. The change in the charter was for the purpose on insuring continuity of membership on the board. Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by McGinnis to recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed changes in terms of the appointed board according to the attached chart. All were in favor. Motion carried." Thank you in advance, for consideration of these requests. Kay Peterson and Marc Sebora will provide answers to questions you may have. Sincerely, a Philip G. Graves President • /cs r ! °! ~ HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE Governing Board Terms 1Vame Term Began Term Ends Re-appointment date 2" Term Ends Steve Sna 1999 December 3i, 2004 Jauua 1, 2405 December 31, 2049 Wane Fortun 200D December 31.2005 Janua 1, 2406 December 31, 2010 Sher Ristau 21103 December 31, 2046 Janua 1, 2407 December 31, 2011 Mike Mueller 2D44 December 31, 2047 Janua 1, 20D8 December 31, 2D12 Bernie Knutson 2404 December 31, 2D08 January 1, 2049 December 31, 2413 Kay Peterson 2404 Council Member Re-appointed each ear Cate McGinnis, MD 20D3 Chief of Medical Staff Re-appointed eery 2 ears H:IADM:1GovemingBoard Teravs Revised 2116104 Memo 70: G. Plotz, Mayor and Gity Council From: James Popp pate: 2119/2004 Ra: Changes to Fireworks Ordinance The current ordinance the City of Hutchinson has for retails sales and storage of fireworks is not in compliance with MN Statutes. Legislators changed the statute last session as well as a maximum amount Cities could charge for permits. Enclosed find the corrections that need to be made to the fireworks ordinance. r 1 I.J C~ ~~a7 PUBLICATION NO. Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE CRF,ATING SECTION 10.051 RELATING TO FIREWORKS PERMITTF,D WITI~IIN TFIE CITY LIIVIIT5 SEC. 10.051 PERMITTEII FIREWORKS. Subd.l Definitions: A. "Fireworks" -For the purposes of this section, "fireworks" will have the same definition as contained in Minnesota Statute Section b24.20 Subd. 1 (c) or any superceding statute. Subd. 2 Permit Required. No person shall sell or possess fox sale fireworks without first having obtained an annual permit from the City. A. The Fire Chief shall give final approval or denial of an application for the manufacture, storage for commercial purposes, or sale of fireworks within 14 days of such application being made to the City. B. Permits shall be issued for a period of one calendar year. C. Prior to processing the application, a criminal records check must he conducted. Neither the applicant nor the responsible party for the permit shall have been convicted of a felony yr a fire/fireworks-related misdemeanor within the last three (3) years. I). Prior to processing the application, the Fire Chief shall determine that the proposed location is code compliant. E. The application shall include a letter from the person legally responsible for the property on which the fireworks related activity will occur. Such letter shall grant permission to the applicant for the use of said property. Subd. 3 Sales and Storage of Fireworks. A. No person shall sell or store fireworks within SBA SO feet of any fuel dispensing apparatus. $. It shall be unlawful for any seller of any fireworks to permit smoking inside or within 50 ft. o£the consumer fireworks retail sales area. "No Smoking" signs must be conspicuously posted and approved lire extinguishers must be available for use. C. In buildings that do not havc an automated sprinkling system, retail sales displays of Creworks shall be limited to a ~ : of T00 ••rr:.werles net weight of 2501bs of~yrotechnic tom osition or 25% of the oss wci ht if the wei ht of pyrotechnic is nol known In buildings that do contain an automated sprinkling system, the amount of fireworks contained in retail sales displays shall be determined by the llutchinson Fire Chief on a cast by case basis after considering the building's construction, fire suppression apparatus and other relevant factors. P. The requirements of this ordinance are in addition to any requirements imposed by any building and zoning regulations, fire codes (MSFC chanter 33 and NFPA 1124) or state law [MN statute G24.20)• E. Only persons 18 years of age or older may purchase fireworks and the age of the purchaser must he verified by photographic identification. F. Ne Exterior storage, display, sales or transient sales of fireworks . are permitted subiect to a site plan review. Site plans shall be submitted for review though the conditional use permit Drocess as identified in Section 6.07 cha ler 11. Conditional use permits will onl be considered within commercial or industrial zonin districts Additionally, tents, canopies or membrane structures must tom 1 with MSFC cha ter 24 . G. No manufacturing sales yr stora a for commercial_~rposes shall occur on residential] zoned ro ert or within 100 ft thereof. Ii. Na erson shall construct a retail dis la nor offer for sale explosives, explosive materials, or fireworks upon highway1 sidewalks, public properties, properties used for educational purpose or assemblies. I. A list of all consumer fireworks displayed and stored on the property shall be available at all limes. The list shall document the name, weight and quantity of the fireworks and be accompanied by the material safety data sheets. . > ~~ IC. A handout describing fireworks shall be provided to each consumer purchasing fireworks. Subd. 4 Use and Possession. A. it is unlawful to use, fire or discharge any fireworks along the route of and during any parade, in any place of public assembly, on any public property or in any commereiaUindustrial zoning district. B. It is unlawful at any time to throw, toss or aim any fireworks at any person, animal, vehicle or other thing or abject or used in any manner that may threaten or cause possible harm to life or property. C. The discharge of fireworks shall be prohibited inside a building and within fifteen (15) feet of any building. D. It shall be unlawful to ienite, discharge or otherwise use fireworks within (300ft 1 of consumer fireworks retail sales facility or store. At least one si shall be conspicuouslyposted on the exterior of_ each side of the consumez fireworks retail sales facilt~tating_ NO FIREWORKS DISCHARGED W1TH1N 300 FEET E. No motor vehicle shall be arked within lU ft. of a consumer fireworks retail sales facility F. The Fire Chief may ban fireworks if dry or windy conditions occur. G. Juveniles may not possess (reworks unless ender the direct supervision of a responsible adult. H. Fireworks Wray shall not be discharged in such a manner that may create a nuisance nor between the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Fireworks shall also he subject to any additional ordinances such as noise and/or assembl areas. I. Officers may seize illegal fireworks: The State Fire Marshal or designee Sheriffs Officer, Police Officer. Constable, Firc Chief or Firc Official shall seize, take, remove or cause to be removed at the expense of the owner all stocks of fireworks or combustibles offered or exposed for sale stored or held in violation of Subdivision 4 Subd. S Penalties A. Materials, which violate and/or pose a threat to public safety may be conFscated and destroyed. Costs associated with disposal shall be assessed hack to the property owner or permit holder. B. Violations of this regulation, city ordinance or state statute may result in revocation of the permit. C. Violations of these fire rules are misdemeanor offenses punishable by fines up to $1000 and/or 9U days in jail. Adopted by the City Council this ~°i `'°° ~`~~ Attest: Gary D. Plot?, City Administrator Marlin Torgersvn, Mayor 1ESOLUTION NO. 12345 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USF. PERMIT REQUESTED BY HABITAT FOR 1=IUMANITY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN HOMES WITIIOUT GARAGES OR IIARDSURFACED llRIVEWAYS LOCATED AT 56D AND 570 HILLTOP DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Crow River Habitat for Humanity, property owner, has applied for a conditional use permit to allow them to construct a twin home without garages to lower the cost of the construction for the Habitat homes. The families receiving lbe homes will be encouraged to improve the properties by adding garages as they are able to afford them. Section 8.05 of the zoning ordinance requires a minimum of 400 square foot attached or detached garage for all new construction. A conditional use permit is required to deviate from the requirement. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 7 and 8, Block 1, Santelman's Third Addition 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safely, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values ofproperties m the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. • 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprohensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby denys the conditional use permit based on not meeting the character of the neighborhood. Adopted by the City Council this 24"' day of February, 2004. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator C~ Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor ~~q~ Hutchinson City Center PATE: TO: NROM: SUBJECT: Hutchinson City Council MEMORANDUM Hutchinson Plaluliug Commission 117 Hassan Street 5E Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320•St37.5151/Fex 320-234-0240 CONSIDF,RAT'ION OF CONllITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUF,STF.D BY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY TO AI.I.OW CONSTRUCTION OF TWIN HOMES WITHOU'T' GARAGES OR HARDSURFACED DRIVEWAYS LOCATED AT 560 AND 570 HILLTOP DRIVE Pursuant to Section 8.06 of Zoning Ordinance No. 4fi4, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow them to construct a twin home without garages to lower the cost of the construction for the Habitat homes. The families receiving the homes will be encouraged to improve the properties by adding garages as they are able to afford them Section 8.06 of the arming ordinance requires a minimum of 400 square Foot attached pr detached garage for all new construction. A conditional use permit is required to deviate from the requirement. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application end Fees were submitted. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on February 5, 2004. ~- There were neighboring property owners present objecting to the request- 4. The guidelines for approving conditional use permits are as follows: A conditional use permit for the uses listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance shall be granted only if evidence is presented to estabhvh: (a) That the proposed building or use at the particularlocatian requested is necessary nrdesirable to pmvide a service or a facility which is in the interest afthe public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community; (b) That the proposed building or use wifl not have a subseantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traff c candittnns, un'dity facilities and ocher masters a~Qecting the publtc health, safety and general welfare; and (c) That the proposed building or use we!! be designed, arranged, and operated so as to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. RECD D TTON The Planning Cvmtnission voted 5 -1 to recommend denial of the conditional use permit based on not meeting the character of the neighborhood. Re_ spectfully subrnittvd, Ilutchinsvn Plarming Corlmlission cc: Cxvw River habitat for Humanity, 305 S- Main Street Ste. 107 Footed an recycled paper - February 18, 2004 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ~ . . To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared sy: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Lisa McClure, Jake Wegner, Jean Ward, John Rodebcrg, P.E., John Webster, John Olson, Lenny Rutiedge, Barry Creive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Cary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Aave Erlandson, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, ALCP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: February 5, 2004 --Meeting Date: February 17, 2004 Applicant: Crow River Habitat 1'or Humanity, property owner CONDITIONAL I1SE PERMIT Brief Description: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow them to construct a twin home without garages to lower the cost of the construction for the Habitat homes. The families receiving the homes will be encouraged to improve the properties by adding garages as they are able to afford them. Section 8.05 of the zoning ordinance requires a minimum of 400 square; foot attached or detached garage for all new construction. A conditional use permit is required to deviate from the requirement. GENERAL. LNFORMATION Existing Zoning: K3 PD Property Location: SGO and 570 Hilltop Drive NE Lot Size: Approximately 145'X66' Existing Land Use: Vacant Adjacent Land Use And Toning: K3 PD to the east, west and north I-1 (L.ight industrial) to the south Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhool 7.,oning History: Sanlleman's 3'~ Addition was approved in 1993 for a mixed residential use. The lots in the application for Conditional Ilse Permit were platted for twinhome construction. Applicable Regulations: Section 8.06 of the City of Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: Hilltop Drive NE Conditional Usc Permit Habitat for Humanity - 560/_570 Hilltop Dr. NF Planning Commission- February 17 , 2004 Page 2 Parking: 2 spaces per dwelling unit for a total of 4 spaces t#nalysis and liccommendation: Staff discussed their concerns' regarding the lack of inside storage on the properties and the present character of the neighborhood. There will not be electricity available to this area until the Summer of 2004. A conditional use permit fur the uses listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance .chald be granted only iJ~evidence is presented to establish: (a) That the proposed building ur use of the particular location requested is necessary nr desirable to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of the public convenience and will contribute to the general welfare of the neig{iborhuud ur canmunity; (b) 'That the proposed building ur use will not hove a substantial or undue adverse effect upon adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, utility facifities and other matters ufjectirag the public health, safety and general welfare; and (c) That the proposed building or use wild be desigmed, arranged, and operated so as• to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. While staff empathizes with the request to make the homes mare affordable, Staff has weighed that with the long term results of not having garages. "There are older homes in the City that were built without garages, but the existing housing to the north have garage space. The planning staff would recommend denial of the request for a Conditional iJse Permit to allow no garages based on not meeting the character of the neighborhood. Cc: Crow River i-Iabitat for Humanity, 305 5. Main St Ste. 107 r~ '~ . 8 3 _ 6_6. 5 0 ~2' S6~ ^=4~39~ - - 6 ~ 0 s o 58 l i p=4 5 3- ` I t 1 i ~ ~~ ~' (D tp .-, .-. ~ ~ ~ g 4 ~ t ~ ice- ~~ T R= B7 . s s3, ~ R= 8?r. 53 ~ ' --- 2C ~~ H! 66 rr - - - ~ 4-4 ~ ~" ti N L ~ .- ~ . 5 ~° f ~~ ~~ - - L ~ O ~ l ~ cn I I l I i ~ ~6 6! - - - -65.00 6 6.00 ;6.00 East 745.85.... ~ ^=4°f ~~ ~ ~ ~ f l z- ~ ~ ~ Y 8~ ~' L .~ M a ~ NI I ~ . ~ t ~6 61 _~ ~ - _ - 66.0o E SpUTH LINE OF SANTELMA • ~ 129 11 llo * 1 ndicates property described in the notice 117 123 106 ©~ a Q 107 H S Io ~1 Feet a~~ so 26 ~" 107 11 11 105 FRLLTOP ~~ ~aa s~~ ~2o s3o Sao Leo Asa ~n ~~ ~a soo 60 x c~ a z 25 125 Chuck Schmidt . c~ ~ ~~~rC~-~' ~~ -----~ 1 'i '~-~~~ fn ~ afo p i &g. .J << ~ hQ.,,~ ~aMeS (~ 5 ~ h~ Sa~~S ~ Na Cenc~e~ ~~<uewa~ a~ b(~Ccf~P2 fir"/ ~ c~ ~ ~ Q iS P ~ o+e ~ -~ ~ ~,.~ ,v °~- ~ o -~- c"c,~~~~PtiS~e S ~ b~~p 0. ~`.pS5lhcc l1 -~-a d ~ cam- ~ v:7 ~ hJ Me ~' ~e ~°`~~'~ /~~~~~ ~`~t b ~~~ e.J '~d~~r`''`5s'~'``~j~-` ~~~5, I ~1 ~_ ~ ~S~ - ~~L-~,- - C ~ " e c~~, l~ ~ lL cC ~1 ~ ~a 4L ~'~ P ~P e~~i~ y-- ~`~C, ~ V ~~2~~~ I~ P °~6 eR" ~ Ca ~~-~c~` ~a ~P~~ ~ w-~~~ hQ~ e °~. S ~ ~5"`,~~~.e~ _ Fes. _ C~~`~ ~ r ~ ~~-~- C 5 ~~ Design Criteria Ai stated in Habitat far Humanity's A~lraa CmrnarK a~rlratr.( tvnaructian praaica should rcfkct the Habitat philosophy of building rimple and de+trnt hvures as de)Fnrd beknu The following points define the critcda affiliates should incorporace inro their house designs. 1. The living space provided-excluding stairwells (except to a basement) and exterior storage-should nor exceai: • 900 square feet for atwo-bedroom boost; ~p70. ware feet for a three-bedroom house; •1..1'30 square ktt for stout-bedroom house. ! x~ 2. The basic ~ This may be compartmentalized fur increased usefulness, or additional baths may be added 6y the family as parr of their budget (sec #3). 3. Families should have an vppor[uniry ro affoct the design of their houses as much as possible. A budget should be rsta6lished with a prcdetcrmined limit (e.g., $1,000) to allow nc~ family co pctsonaliu their home with such features as picture windows, fenr~na, half bath, etc. 4. Eacirhousc should fiaar a m~vaeed p~y`etrenrtee. 5. When feasible, at last one entrance ro the house ahouid be accessible to persons who ~~~~~ 6. All passage doors, including the bathroom door, should 6c three feet (3') wide. Halls should be at least three feet and four inches (3' 4") wide from frame to Frame. (Noce: if there is a door in the hallway, minimum width increasees to three feet and seven inches (37").) These standards allow for simple access for persona with disabilities and increase the cost only alighdy Further adaptations may be ruxded if a family member is disabled. 7. Homes should nor have ~ragcs or carports. Noes: Alrhaugh rehabilitaaion projecd may provide a set of citc7rmskrn[a in which sonic of tfx above guidelines axnnot be me6 affrliata should maintain the intent and rpirir of theguidelina whrn ditennining slit spcrifia and crtenr of rlx proposed rrhrtbilitativn. Plans xhat conform to these guidelines are available in the Habitat for Humanity P/anbook, item No. 3999. Call Order Processing at (800) 422-5914 to order this resource. Plans are also available via Habitat's extranet at http://parmerner.habitat.org. Actress the Library section and go ro Jte Cvnsrrucrion and Environmental Resoutrut link. L~ Memo To: HRA Board and Mayor and Ciry/Council From: Jean Ward ~~ ~~ "` Date: 2/24/20D4 rte: Affordability gap to Habitat homebuyers to assist in building garages As you are all aware, the Hutchinson HtZ4 has administered the Hutchinson Home Purchase Opportunity Prpgrem (HHPOP) to assist low and moderate income homebuyers in purchasing newly constructed starter homes within the City of Hutchinson. Over 60 homebuyers have been assisted by HHPOP in Hutchinson. Another goal of the program is to create neighborhoods that are assets to the community-neighborhoods that would remain attractive and livable over time. The HRA is sensitive to the fact that building affordable housing is not easy or inexpensive and we support the Habitat mission in Hutchinson. We know that there is a concern about the affordability of . Habitat homebuyers to afford a garage. Therefore, the following proposal is made: As pan of the HHPOP umbrella, with HR4 and City Council approval, the HRA could provide affordability gap for the building of a garage for ~e Habitat homebuyar. This would be a 0% deferred loan, due on sale or when the first mortgage loan is paid off, the exact same terms for other HHPOP hvmebuyers. No monthly payments are required. Though funds are limited, up to $8,000 could be committed at this time for this purpose. (This would sufFlce to build the proposed Twin Home.) This is based on an estimate of $4,DDD for materials fora 4D0 sq. ff. garage. Application would need to be made by the Habitat homabuyer to the HFZ4. This would not be a grant, but a deferred loan to the Habitat homebuyer, just as our other HHPOP homebuyers; however, it would be structured to provide affordability gap of a limit of $4,000 with the express purpose of helping to build a garage. Please let me know iF you have additional ideas or any concerns with this proposal. Thank you. Td: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom 1{loss, Director of Information Technology RE: Consulting Services For Aerial Mapping BATE: 2/20/04 The City of Hutchinson has requested proposals from three companies to offer consulting services fox Aerial Mapping in 2004. Following are the cost proposals to from each of those companies. Horizons Incorporated Minnetonka, MN. $140,750 MarlcHurd Maple Grove, MN $66,195 Martinez Corporation Eagan, MN $56,500 The City of Maple Grove had extensive work done in 2000 by Martinez Corporation and was extremely pleased with the service and products provided by Martinez Corporation. John Rodeberg, Julie Wischnack and myself reviewed the proposals from each of the three companies and based on the ability to meet our job specifications, price structure and feed back from the City of Maple Grove, all agreed that Martinez Corporation would be well qualified to perform the consulting services we require. I am therefore requesting approval to enter into the attached agreement with Martinez Corporation. Note: Because this is a consulting service there is no need to go through a formal bid process. q~b~ Aerial Photo and Mapping Agreement THIS AGREEMENT, entered into khis day of , 2004, by and between the City of Hutchinson and Martinez Corporation. THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSBTH, that the City of Hutchinson and the Martinez Corporation, for the consideration hereinafter stated, agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Martinez Corporation hereby covenants and agrees to perform and execute all the provisions of the plans and specifications as prepared by the City of Hutchinson, and indicated under Article lI. ARTICLE ll. Martinez Corporation will provide to the Ciiy of Hutchinson the following services and or deliverables as outlined below in the area indicated on the attached map: A. Color Digital (?rthoPhoto's will be done using a 5000-foot flight and achieve a'12 foot per pixel resolution. The photography shall be adequate to support the production of topographic maps at a scale of I" = 100'. The resulting Digital Orthophoto will have a resolution to support zooming into a 200' x 200' area with clarity to differentiate between a rooftop and an attached deck structure. The digital orthophoto's will be supplied in MrSID and T1F formats as a color corrected seamless mosaic of the entire area outlined above. B. Contour Files will he provided in both native AutoCAD and ArcGIS formats. Contours will be at 2' intervals with every 5 contours labeled with its elevation. Contour lines will not be interrupted due to physical structures. A copy of the DTM in ASCiI format will be provided to the City of Hutchinson. Each record would contain point number and x,y,z coordinates along with break lines. C. Planimetrics will include all buildings and street edges. D. Coordinate SLStem All data will be completed in McLeod County ground coordinate system. i The following quality control specifications will be adhered to: 1. Ma~AccuracY All maps shall comply with the National Map Accuracy Standards for the requested product scale. All map positions of planimetric features must be within 1/30 inch at a 1"=100' scale. All contours will conform to ]National Map Accuracy Standards in which 90"/0 of the contours must be within %a contour interval and the remaining 10% cannot exceed the contour interval. 2. Fli ht~ Conditions The contractor shall be required to aerial photograph the City of Hutchinson and joint planning area in the spring of 2D04. The photos will be taken in leaf off conditions with no snow cover. The photos will only be taken when well-defined images can be obtained and shall not be attempted when the ground is obscured by haze, smoke or dust. Photographs shall not contain shadows detrimental to photographic composition caused by the effects of a sharp sun angle. The photographic work shall be completed during a time of day when a 30-degree or less sun angle can be achieved. There shall be no shadows visible due to clouds in any of the photos. 3. Retlights • blights that do not meet specifications stated herein shall be reflown. All re- flights and related work to correct inadequate deliverables will be made at the contractor's expense. ARTICLE ffI: The entire project will be complete and delivered to the City of Hutchinson no later than August 30"', 20D4. ARTICLE IV: The City of Hutchinson, upon receiving the deliverables from Martinez Corporation, will have ten working days to review the data for accuracy. Upon acceptance of the data, the City of Hutchinson agrees to pay a total of $56,500 for the products and services outlined in Article II as a lump sum payment. ARTICLE V: Martinez Corporation understands and agrees that the City of Hutchinson may distribute the data collected to third parties tither for a fee specified in the City of Hutchinson fee schedule or in certain casts free of charge. Martinez Corporation will hold no copyrights to the data supplied to the City of Hutchinson. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this agreement have hereunto set their hands. CITY OF HUTCHINSON MARTINEZ CORPORATION L J EY (MAYOR) And (CITY ADMnJISTRATOK) (AiITIIORIZED MAKTINEZ REPRESENTATIVE) l J g ~ ~$ ti ~~ E R[ - - ~ .. ,~..y L ..r~ ~ ,.. j ,,,_ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ _ N ~ y ~ ~ `~' Cf 7 ~ ,,~ u ~ ¢ ~ L ~ m ~ ~ ) i ~ J e .~ •- U .. ~ ~ ~~ ', E I~~ ~`_ 3,~ ,_ ~ 3 ~a ~~. ~~ ~. ~, ~_ ~~~, ~~~ ,- ~,..o.~~... ._«~......~...~._.~. ._._. ~ ._a~. ~ _.~„ .~._t ~ - ~ ._~_ ._. ~. ,~~ i ~; .. ~- .. m.., m ~~,.~. ~., ~ ~..~ ~ ~ o ,-:, ~- ~ .ti..„ .„~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . P W s-~ N 7 -_ fl - / a ~ e, i ~. ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~. r V ~ i ~ ~ M - D 1 f x a '~ ~ i it ~~ ~ r.~ ~. ._ _. -::,r.-_... . _. .___._ ~ - -._. # o.~..,. ......e.. ~. R. .~ ~ i n 1 ~ 1 1 1 N l- __ r ~ ~ .•~.~ ., i ~ , ._ _~ ~.. a.~,. x- , e Y *" A 1 ~ t III. _ ~ N _ f .t ~ ~_~ i ! 3 CY. M I -' ~ '~" ~} M L'tl ~` Q 1 ry r r C i ~ k 7 f. _L ._~ ..,.. ~., .~... .. ~,yw_~ _.. . ~~ f ~ ~ .. ..~.....~_.-. ~+ 1 ~. 4p~ 1 ~ `,,, ~ ~, f ~.~..~.,,..,..,~...--d....~._.. ,.., ~ ~ .. W b '~ f f/f// ~ ~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON MEMO Finance Department February 20, 2004 TO: MAYOR & CITY CDUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: FINANCING MAPING PROJECT We would propose the following funding to the City Council for the mapping and the necessary fly over. Hutchinson Utilities and the City Water/Wastewater departments would fund part of the cost. The balance would be part of the 2004 improvement bond project this year or possibly the General Fund, fund balance. We would wait until we have audited numbers for 2003 and any legislative decision this year before making the final recommendation to the Council. As we move into the future the City would be recovering these costs by charging customers wanting this type of information. H:\OOC\City Council memo 3.doC c C~ Hutchinson City Center 111 Henesn Stnxt 8W: Elulehinson, MN 5535f1-2522 320-589-5151/F'az }2U-234.47.40 MEMORANDUM DATE: February 19, 2004 TO: City Council FROM: Planning Commission SUBJECT: PLANNING/ZONING/BUILDING SURVEY At their regular meeting held on February 101h ,the City Council authorized the Hutchinson Planning Commission to oversee the planning/zoning and building survey process by appointment of a three member survey panel from the Commission. The Planning Commission discussed the appointment at their meeting held February 17, 2004. A motion was made by Chairman Kirchoff and seconded by Ms. Otteson not to be involved with the compiling of the surveys. After discussion, Chairman KirchofF moved to amend the motion by adding the City should rent a P.O. Box and Councilman Stotts would pick the surveys up and bring to a City Council workshop to be opened. Seconded by Ms. Otteson the motion was unanimously carried. Pmm~a nn mcydgl paper- \~C~ `J ,.;~ ~E9 z T ?004 cry of H apt of p` ~'a ~n M E M O R A N D U M n L_J TO: Planning Commission FROM: Marc A. Sebora, City Attorney ~• DATE: February 17, 2004 Sl1BJECT: Planning/Building Department Survey At the regular City Council meeting of February 10, 2004, the City Council (at Council Member Stotts request) approved a motion to have a survey conducted by the Hutchinson Planning/Huilding Department in regards to satisfaction of applicants for various permits within the PlanningBuilding Department. The City Council authorized the survey results to be tabulated by the Planning/Building bepartment, type written, and made available to the City Council members. The City Council also authorized Hutchinson Planning Commission to oversee the survey process by appointment of athree-member survey panel from the Planning Commission. Once the survey questionnaires have been returned to and compiled by the PlanningBuilding Department, you may request a copy of them from Bonnie $aumetz. Unfortunately, I will not be at the meeting tonight as I have family commitments that prevent me from attending. If you should have any questions, please direct them to Julie Wischnack. °~L~~ Survey As the chairman of the Hutchinson Planning Commission I would like to address the issue of suggested survey as reported in the February 12`h Hutchinson Leader. I fee] that the Planning Commission should not be involved with the compiling of the surveys. I believe that this would only put the Planning Commission in uncomfortable situation. Please remember that the Planning Commissioners is an advisory board only, & this is a volunteer pusitiuu that lass been appointed fYom the City Council. 1 feel thts will not be awin/win for my Commission. i do agree with the Mayor that it would be a good process. I think Public Engagement is a good way of getting citizens involved. Public Engagement is a distinctive way of helping citizens discusses controversial issues. Please beware of survey results that may be misleading: Often there is a distinction between what people consider right for themselves & what they think should be written into ordinance. Red Plags: Public Agenda uses several indicators to judge when survey results should be reported and used cautiously: • Results change when survey questions are reworded slightly • Results change when implications or trade-offs o£policy are pointed out • Results maybe misleading if reported in isolation or out of context • Other research suggests that people have incomplete or inaccurate knowledge in this area. With this said I would advise that the Planning Conunission not take part of the process. Hutchinson Planning Commission Chairman Dean Kirchof£ ~~ We are in the process of trying to identify ways to better serve you, our customers, and our records show that you used the Planning, Zoning and Building services of the city of Hutchinson in the past two years. Please take a few minutes to fill out this anonymous questionnaire and let us know how we did. Were you satisfied with the service that you received yee no Please provide additional comments (add additional pages if needed) • What services or changes would you like to see? (please add additional pages if needed) Please place your completed questionnaire in the enclosed stamped envelope. A committee of the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be compiling your comments and presenting them to the City Administer and City Council. Thank you for taking the time to allow us a chance to better serve you in the future. C Hutchinson City Center 111 Hessnn Street 5E Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522 320.587.5151/M'ax 720.2.14-0240 ~~ ! i ~ - TO: Mayor and City Council FRAM: john P. Rodcberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works Randy DeVries, Director of Water/Wastewater 12E: Special Council Information Meeting: Water Treatment Plant DATE: February 20, 2004 W e are requesting that the Council consider an informational meeting to discuss the status and future direction ofthe Water Treatment Plant. We would like consideration ofthe following time, prior to the regularly scheduled Council meeting: Tuesday, April 13t", 2004 from 4:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. We will be making a presentation (in coordination with Scott Young of Earth Tcch, and Water Supervisor Dick Nagy) outlining the history of the proposed project, desigxl considerations and issues, and our next steps. We are currently reviewing our contract status/project timing with Earth Tech and will be presenting a proposal to proceed with the remaining work at that time. Currently, it is proposed to complete plans and specifications in early 2005 to allow construction to start first thing that spring. Thank you. Prinlnl pn rccycleil paper ~~\J` :~.. 1 Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council 1~ROM: Brenda K. Ewinrectvr of Human Resources RE: City Administrator Annual Performance Review DATE: February ] 7, 2004 It is requested that the City Council consider the scheduling of the annual performance review for City Administrator Gary Plotz. Historically, the Council has scheduled a closed meeting as part of a regular meeting agenda to complete the review. if you have any questions regarding this process, please contact me at City Center, or staff at the Council meeting can address them. L~ a~~~ _ FDR YOUR INFURMATlON JjLcO~,~~b 34422 ~fB 1 7 70p4 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD ~'~' °/ Nuten WASHINGTON, DC 20423 apt °f P, x. $ ~n ENVIRONMEN'T'AL ASSESSMENT STB DOCKET NO. AB-Sfi4X Iennepin County Regional Railroad Authority -Abandonment Exemption - Tn McLeod, Carver and Hennepin Counties, MN I3A KGRO D In this proceeding, the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority (HCRRA or raihoad) filed a notice under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for exemption from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to abandon a line of railroad in McLeod, Carver and Hennepin counties, Minnesota (MhT). The rail line proposed for abandonment extends from Milepost 24.6 near Wayzata to Milepost 68.5 in Hutchinson (subject rail line). The total distance is approximately 43.9 miles. Upon receipt of abandonment authority, HCRRA would be able to remove rails, crossties, ballast, bridges or other track material. HCARA intends to remove the rails, but preserve the rail line for future rail use or other compatible public transportation uses. A map depicting the rail line in relationship to the area served is appended to this report. DESCRI TO F THE LI The land use /land cover types in the vicinity of the right-of--way (ROW) include urban, residential and rural. The residential land uses are most common on the eastern portions of the line and the rural land uses are most common on the western portions of the line. The urban land uses are present in the City of Hutchinson. According HCRRA, a prior owner of the rail line reduced the width of the ROW from 100 feet to as narrow as 20 feet through property sales. HCRRA also stated that rail traffic has not originated, terminated or moved overhead on the subject line for more than three years. The last movement of traffic on the line occurred on May l6, 2000. Prior to this date, the line was used to move approximately 420 cars per year to transport plasfic, lumber, scrap steel and chemicals. The subject line was built in the late 1800s by James 7. Hill as part of the Dakota Rail Line. Mr. Hill provided rail service to two hotels on Lake Minnetonka. Tn the 18805, the line was owned and operated by the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway. In the 1900s, the railway was renamed the Great Northern and both passengers and freight moved on the line. Burlington Northern assumed ownership in 1970 following the merger of three railroads. In 1985, Burlington Northern turned the rail line over to Dakota Rail, Inc. to operate. Ina 1990 bankruptcy proceeding, new owners assumed control of Dakota Rail, Inc. and the rail line. Rail America, Inc. purchased Dakota Rail, Inc, and the rail line in 1995 and continued to serve six to seven customers. Irr May 2000, Dakota Rail, Ina (still under the ownership of Rail America) filed for abandonment of the line as a result of declining customer demand and deteriorating track conditions. The petition was dismissed after HCRRA was granted permission to acquire the line through an offer of financial assistance. HCRRA stated that it has not been economically feasible to resume rail operations; and therefore, has sought abandonment in this proceeding. However, HCIiRA intends to preserve the ROW for future rail use ar other compatible public transportation use. HCRRA stated that a prior owner of the rail line had leased property adjacent to the line to an oil company in St. Bonafacious. Activities of the oil company apparently resulted in contamination of the ROW at that location. HCRRA has removed the tanks, which were the source of the contamination, and is in the process of obtaining a file closure letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment completed for HCRRA also identified 32 sites and properties on and adjacent to the rail line with a high likelihood of soil and/or groundwater contamination, and 41 sites and properties on and adjacent to the rail line with a medium environmental risk for soil and/or groundwater contamination. According to HCRRA, there are up to 20 structures on the line khat are or may be 50 years of age or older including 17 bridges and three buildings. The majority of the bridges are timber trestles. The three buildings include the Spring Park Station (constructed in 1900 and altered in 1949), the Hutchinson Station (constructed in 1886, altered in 1949, and damaged by fire in 2001), and a concrete block building at Lester Prairie (constructed in the 19505). ENVIRONMEN AL REVIEW The railroad submitted environmental and historical reports that indicate that the quality of the human environment would not be affected significantly as a result of the abandonment or any past-abandorunent activities. The raihbad served these reports on a number of appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies as required by the Surface Transportation Board's (Board) environmental rules [49 CFR 1105.7(b)]. 'T'he Board's Section of Environmental Analysis (5EA) reviewed and investigated the record in this proceeding. The U.S. Departtnent of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service -State Resource Conservationist (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) concluded that the proposed abandonment is not likely to permanently affect agricultural land. The Carver County Regional Railroad Authority, City o£Mound, City of Spring Park, and City of Wayzata expressed support for the proposed abandonment. The City o£Hutchinson a Planning Commission, City of Orono, City of Spring Park, and City of Wayzata also noted that the proposed abandonment is consistent with their land use plans. M The City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach stated that the proposed abandonment is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan states that the rail line should be retained for railroad use and should not be abandoned. The Metropolitan Council (Council)' concluded that the proposed abandonment is in conformance with the metropolitan system plan for transportation by preserving the linear ROW. The Council recommended that HCRRA retain the bridges on the line for potential future use as a regional trail. Under existing permits, the Council noted that it operates regional sanitary sewer lines that occur within or cross the rail line ROW. The Council has no objection to the abandonment as long as its existing permits remain in effect and that the Council would continue to have access to the sewer lines for maintenance and reconstruction. The Council also found that the Comprehensive Plan for the City of the Village of Minnetonka Beach is not compatible with the recreational trail plans of the other cities along the rail line. Because traffic has not moved on the subject rail line for at least two years, the proposed abandonment would not be expected to impact the development, use and transportation of energy resources or recyclable commodities, or result in the diversion of rail traffic to truck traffic that could result in impacts to air quality or the local transportation network. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - St. Paul District had not responded to the applicant's environmental report at the time this Environmental Assessment (EA) was prepared. HC1tRA notes that wetlands would not be affected by the proposed abandonment. However, the line crosses numerous streams and lakes and it is uncertain whether these bridges would be removed by HCRRA. Bridge removal activities have the potential to impact waters of the United States. Therefore, we have recommended a condition to address this concern. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USPWS)-'twin Cities Field Office determined that the project is not likely to adversely affect any Federally listed or proposed threatened or endangered species, or adversely modify their critical habitat..The Fort Snelling realty division of the U5FW5 also expressed no concerns regarding the proposed abandonment. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Region 5 had not responded to HCRRA's environmental report at the time this)?A was prepared. The U.S. bepartment of Commerce's National Geodetic Survey (NG5) has identified five (5) geodetic station markers that maybe affected by the proposed abandonment. Therefore, SEA recommends a condition to address this concern. 1The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning agencyin the seven-county metropolitan area of the Irvin Cities, Minnesota. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) expressed concern about potential environmental impacts of the proposed abandonment. The MPCA concerns are related solid and hazardous waste disposal, asbestos, stormwater runoff, contaminated soil, and above and below ground storage tanks. Therefore, we have recommended a condition to address this concern. The Minnesota Historical Society (the State Historic Preservation Office or SHPO) responded to the applicant's historical report but had not completed its assessment of the proposed abandonment at the time this EA was prepared. The SlIPO requested additional information on the extent of Fre damage to the Hutchinson Station, and also noted that it was not clear whether the rail line itself meets eligibility criteria for the National Register of Historic Places. Pending completion of the SHPO's assessment, SEA recommends a condition to ensure compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f. CON ITIO We recommend that the following environmental conditions be placed on any decision granting abandonment authority: 1. Prior to conducting any abandonment and salvaging activities, the raihnad shall consult with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - St. Pau117istrict on permitting requirements for any abandonment and salvaging activities that may occur within waters of the United States including but not limited to streams, rivers, lakes and wetlands. 2. Prior to conducting any abandonment and salvaging activities, the raihnad shall consult with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency regarding solid and hazardous waste disposal, asbestos, stormwater runoff, contaminated soil, and above and below ground storage tanks. 3. The National Geodetic Survey (NGS) has identified five (5) geodetic station markers that could be affected by the proposed abandonment. Therefore, the railroad shall notify NGS 90 days prior to salvage activities in order to plan for their potential removal. 4. The raihbad shall retain its interest in and take no steps to alter the historic integrity of the right-of--way until completion of the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f. ~J CONS • Subject to the recommended conditions, and based on the information provided from all sources to date, we conclude that, as currently proposed, abandonment of the line would not significantly affect the quality of the human environrttent. Therefore, the environmental impact statement process is unnecessary. Alternatives to the proposed abandonment wou]d include denial (and, therefore, no change in operations), discontinuance of service without abandonment and continued operation by anokher operator. In any of these cases, the existing quality of the human environment and energy consumption should not be affected. P LIC SE Following abandonment and salvage of the rail line, the ROW maybe suitable For other public use. A request containing the requisite four-part showing for imposition of a public use condition (49 CFR 1152.28) must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board and served on the railroad within the time specified in the Federal e~ister notice. TRAILS TJ61~. A request for a notice of interim trail use (NITU) is due to the Surface Transportation Board, with a copy to the railroad, within 20 days of publication of the notice of exemption in the eder a 'ter. However, the Board will accept late-filed requests as long as it retains jurisdiction to do so. This request must comply with the Board's rules for use of ROWS as trails (49 CFR 1152.29). PT BLI AS I5TANC~ The Board's Office of Public Services (OPS) responds to questions regarding interim trail use, public use, and other reuse alternatives. You may contact OPS directly at 202-565-1592 or mail inquiries to the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Public Services, Washington, DC 20423. EN'VIRON ENTAL ~l)MMEN'I'$ If you wish to file comments regarding this environmental assessment, send an original and two copies to Surface Transportation Board, Case Control Unit, Washington, DC 20423, to the attention of David Navecky, who prepared this environmental assessment. Please refer to STB Docket No. AB-S64X in all correspondence addressed to the Board. Questions . regarding this environmental assessment should be referred to David Navecky at 202-5(5- 1593 (naveckyd@stb.dot.gov). Date made available to the public: February 13, 2004 Comment due date: March 1, 2D04 By the Board, Victoria ltutson, Chief, Section of Environmental Analysis. Vemon A. Williams Secretary Attachment i a A~ °~ ~ ~ ~a.~ ~~~/ i ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ , ~~~ ~~ p'ebruary ,.., ~~ ,fl ,,,~ `® ~~~ ~mm oa 3 C.~'1 ~` a4~Qal ~ .3 ~ZSoduwtow /~SSgCI Art C•N 10, 2004 Dear Downtown Business or Property Owners, Earlier this year, many of you attended a SWOT Analysis/Planning Session at Jonny's Restaurant. The Hutchinson Downtown Association hosted the session to help determine the future of downtown. To clarify for those of you who were not able to attend, SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Enclosed with this letter, you will find a copy of the results from the SWOT analysis. Please take some time to review the results. Within the next couple of weeks, you will receive a brief survey asking you to share your opinions about a number of issues that are related tv downtown Hutchinson. Your thoughts, suggestions, and ideas are appreciated and will be helpful in determining the future of downtown Hutchinson. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Lisa McClure at (320) 234-4223. Sincerely, Hutchinson Downtown Association Board of Directors Hutchinson Downtown Council . SWOT Analysis Wednesday, January 14"', 2004 7:3D -11:30am Jonny's Restaurant The session today was called to assist in the determination of a future direction for the Hutchinson Downtown. A Vision statement by this group (or it's previous membership) was crafted several years ago. That vision was/is: Downtown Hutchinson will be the "heart and soul" of our Communfty, serving as a destination point for residents and visitors seeking business and professional services, unique shopping opportunities, dining establishments, and arts and entertainment activities. Downtown Hutchinson will be clean and safe with restored buildings that complement the history and character of our community and a streetscape that is aesthetically pleasing and pedestrian friendly. powntown Hutchinson will prosper because business and property owners, city staff, elected officials, and community members will work together to stimulate economic development by promoting downtown as an exciting place to visit, invest and do business. Keeping that vision in mind, the group embarked upon a SWOT analysis. A SWOT analysis is in reality, afacilitator-directed "group think" which enables the participants to identify the Organization's, or in this case "Downtown Hutchinson's", Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, which in turn, can lead to a Strategic Direction and Strategic Plan. The large group was divided into smaller groups of 7-8 people and each smaller group was asked to consider the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats facing Downtown Hutchinson and report bank to the larger group. This report provides the specifics in each category for each group as well as a listing of the overall Large Group Results. In the following paragraphs, I will provide a summary for each category as well as my overall impressions of the group's feedback and it's dynamic. The smaller groups were asked tc identify the strengths of downtown Hutchinson and had no trouble coming up with these. The group dynamic was that of a group of people who were engaged, excited and very proud to be a part of downtown Hutchinson. Strengths What are your advantages? What do you do well? What relevant resources do you have? What do other people see as your strengths? Some strengths identified by most groups include: The river gateway • Buildings downtown and their historical significance as well as the charm of the "small town" • Strung community leadership Pride in ownership • Friendly people/nice community • Strong financial community Downtown Plan One area that was not mentioned that I believe is a real strength is the Customer Service available through the downtown establishments. Most of these strengths were also evident in the research that led to the creation of the vision statement several years ago. Weaknesses What could you improve? What do you do badly? What should you avoid? The following came up as weaknesses from mare than one group' • Parking • fighting Traffic Signals (timing and crosswalks) • Empty storefronts • No Common Hours Cleanliness • Lack of Marketable vision (niche) Communication of the Downtown Plan • Housing, Business and service mix. Of special interest is that when the group was asked to identify weaknesses, the tone of the group changed. The discussion was lower in volume; the energy of the group seemed to diminish. I shared this observation with the group as a whole, and asked if they could identify the potential cause for the change in group dynamic, as we moved on to weaknesses. (I have not encountered this stark of a change in the group discussion in previous SWOTS I have done, either for Hutchinson Area Health Care or other business groups.) A discussion then took place which identified that there was some dissatisfaction on the part of some members of the group with what had been done so far with the Downtown • Council, i.e. the special services tax, as well as some disappointment by the members of the Council who had worked very hard on the Downtown Plan as well as the defeat of • the special services tax. Clearly there were people in attendance from both camps. The discussion began to clear the air in some fashion. We moved on to identify threats, as hopefully this would help us open discussion further for the concerns of both camps, as well as identify threats that needed to be addressed by both camps, regardless of their stance on the Downtown Plan or the special services tax. Threats Highway Projects in the next 2 to 4 years Loss of the Blg Boxes Lack of funding to implement plans Burnout by the current Downtown Association Members Separation of groups with different agendas (camps) Doing nothing There were two threats that were not identrfied by the groups that need to be considered as far as the future of the businesses in the downtown district as well as on a state and national level. First are the projections for available workers in the future. Much research has been done, which ident~es that we are the cusp of seeing our largest . consumer group, the baby boomers become more demanding as well as more in need of services, incuding service from the Downtown Businesses. The research shows that there simply will not be enough people In the workforce to serve the customers needs. Another threat that could and probably will have a direct impact on the future of our downtown Hutchinson businesses is the continued growth and opportunity for the consumer to use technology to meet their need, including shopping and services. We are currently in a situation where there are four generations of people in the workplace, each generation with their own special needs, preferences and beliefs. The generations behind the Baby Boomers, not only are. savvy with the ability to purchase goods and services on line; they have also come to see this as a way of life. I would advocate that these two factors also be considered in future planning for Downtown Hutchinson. (Can I visit Downtown Hutchinson "on-line°, while still maintaining some of the ambiance of the strengths we identified in the beginning of this exercise. If I do seek services in Downtown Hutchinson in person, will there be enough people to meet my customer service needs and maintain or improve the standard that has been previously identified in the Strengths section of this exercise?) Opportunities The groups were asked then, how can we take the strengths, weaknesses, and threats and turn them into opportunities for Downtown Hutchinson? The process used to identify opportunities was as follows. • Each Participant was asked to identify from the strengths, weaknesses, and threats, 4 areas of opportunity that they considered essential to the future success of Downtown Hutchinson. The top areas are as follows, not necessarily in order of number of votes received. Opportunities • Getting together with the neighbors to the south (Independent vs. chain) • Highway projects Do Something Liquor Store • Funding Lighting • EntertainmenUFinedlning • Downtown Plan (revisit and communicate) add new members to the group • Empty storefronts. • Use of Chamber to help with the work and funding • Hutchinson to be a destination city (Community niche, like New Ulm, or Stillwater) Following this exercise, a plan of action was determined. It is as follows: Bring the Downtown Council back together to discuss the SWOT results . . Add new members to the Board. Interested persons are to contact Matt McMillan • Survey the large group, including and especially those who were unable to attend, about the Downtown Plan and next steps. The council will develop the survey. • Resend the plan, or make it available on request, as well as the results of today's SWOT along with the survey Respectfully Submitted Robyn Erickson Care and Program Support Services Division Director Hutchinson Area Health Care. L L • February 12, 2D04 Ms. Lindsay Whalen 42 Lynn Road Southwest Hutchinson, MN 55350 T7ear Lindsay: Hutchinson City Center 111 nneean Street SE llutchinean, MN 55350.2522 320.587-S1S1/Fsn 32iti234-4240 Please accept our congratulations on your successful Gopher Basketball Season. 'T'he City Council, Hutchinson City Employees, and T are all very excited about your achievements. Attached is a signed proclamation declaring February 20, 2004 as LTNDBAY WHALEN DAY. We wish you the best of luck on your continued success! Sincerely, ~ r~ M tin Tor e~~ Mayor, City of Hutchinson T.nclosure - Primed on recycled pxpsr - PROCLAMATION IN PROUD recognition of Lindsay Whalen's achievements both on and off the basketbal] court, the City of Hutchinson is pleased to present this Proclamation in appreciation of her positive representation of the City of Hutchinson `~ Wooden Womeri s Award Preseason All American Team ~' Member of USA Young Women's Team ~ Kodak/WBCA First Team ~ Naismith Award and Wade Trophy Finalist `~ Three Time Golden Gopher MVP ~-' 2003 Sig Ten Sportsmanship Award ~ 2003 USBWAAll-American ~ 20D2 Big Ten Player of the Year `~ Associated Press Third-Team All-American `~ A11-Missota Conference Each Year of High School `~' Led Her Team to Missota Conference Title in 7 997, 199$, and 1999 ~ Earned All Conference Honors in Tennis and Track February 20, 2004 is proclaimed as LINDSAY WHALEN DAY Presented by the Mayor and City Counci] of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Memo To: HRA Board and Mayor and City>Council From: Jean Ward •~~,4v_-,~ uf7~-I "L R1ate: 2/24l2D04 Re: Affordability gap to Habitat homebuyers to assist in building garages As you are all aware, the Hutchinson HRA has administered the Hutchinson Home Purchase Opportunity Program (HHPOP) to assist Icw and moderate income homebuyers in purchasing newly constructed starter homes within the City of Hutchinson. Over 6D homebuyers have been assisted by HHPOP in Hutchinson. Another goal of the program is to create neighborhoods that are assets to the community-neighbortiocds that would remain attractive and livable over time. The HRA is sensitive to the fact that building affordable housing is not easy or inexpensive and we support the Habitat mission in Hutchinson. We know that there is a concern about the affordability of . Habitat homebuyers to afford a garage. Therefore, the following proposal is made: As part of the HHPOP umbrella, with HRA and City Council approval, the HRA could provide affordability gap for the building of a garage for the Habitat homebuyer. This would be a D% deferred loan, due on sale or when the first mortgage loan is paid off, the exact same terms for other HHPOP homebuyers. No monthly payments are required. Though funds are limited, up to $B,ODD could be committed at this time for this purpose. (This would suffice tc build the proposed Twin Home.) This is based on an estimate of $4,000 for materials fora 4D0 sq. ft. garage. Application would need to be made by the Habitat homebuyer to the HRA. This would not be a grant, but a deferred loan to the Habitat homebuyer, just as cur other HHPOP homebuyers; however, it would be structured to provide affordability gap of a limit of $4,DD0 with tha express purpose of helping to build a garage. Please let me know if you have additional ideas or any concerns with this proposal. Thank you. r~ L 11 t NORTH CANAL STREET SUITE 950 CItICAGO, IL 60808.7770 TEL: (3tT) 930.0070 (800) 444.4554 FAX: (31 T) 930-0017 Fehruary 20, 2004 Mr. Gary Plotz Administrator City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street S>; I~utchinson, MN 55350 RE: Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Hutchinson, Mc Leod County, Minnesota Dear Mr. Plotz: FOR Y°U~ ~1~~®~,~ ~~~°°~S' We wish to thank you and Barry Greive for the cooperation given to our representative, Valerie Mosby, during our recent survey. We have completed our analysis of the building codes adopted by your community and the efforts put forth to properly enforce those codes. The resulting Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification is 3 for 1 and 2 family residential property and 3 fox commercial and industrial property. The Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) is an insurer-supported organization with the primary mission of providing advisory insurance underwriting and rating information to insurers. There is no requirement that insurem use our advisory material. Insurers may have adopted, or may be in the process of adopting, an ISO insurance rating program that will pt•ovide rating credits to individual properly insurance policies in recognition of community efforts to mitigate property damage due to natural disasters. These insurers may use the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Classification we have recently developed for your community as a basis for the credits used. While individual insurers may use different credits or different effective dates, the ISO program will apply credits to new consnuction within Hutchinson that has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy in the year 2004 and forward. We have attached a copy of our report which provides additional information about our classification process and how we have graded various aspects of your community's building codes and their enforcement. We want to highlight the fact that the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is an insurance underwriting and information tool; it is not intended to analyze all aspects of a comprehensive building code enforcement program nor is it for purposes of determining compliance with any state nr local law or for making property/casualty loss prevention and life safety recommendations. Mr. Gary Plotz February 30, 2UU4 . Page 2. If you have any questions about the Classification that was developed, please let us know. Additionally, if ynu are planning on any future changes in your building codes or their enforcement, please advise us as these changes may affect our analysis and your community's grading classification. Sincerely, BuiCding Code ~epar~ment Building Code Department (8DU) 93U-1677 Ext. 6208 Enclosure . cc: Barry Greive, Building Official w/enclosure F INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC. ' 9TAEEf 5l1YfE 950 :MKJ'.C`i..yN018 A0006.7Y70 July 1, 1999 Mr. Marlin Torgerson ylavor City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan St SE Hutchinson. MCI 55350-2522 Dear :~tavor Toruerson: 171~¢10~OW0 10001 a°i554 SPX; 'c 97P0017 W'e wish to thank you and Mark Hensen Far the coo~eratio~iv_en to q~'.rspresentative, G'alerie Fettig-Mosby, daring our recent survey. We have completed our analysis of the building codes adopted by your community and the effort put forth to properly enforco those codes. The resulting Building Effectiveness Grading Classification is 6 for 1 and 2 family residential property and 6 far commercial and industrial propetty. LJ The Insurance Services Office. Inc. I ISOI is an insurer-supported organization with the primary mission of providing advisor' insurance underwriting and rating information to insurers, There is no requirement that insurers use our advisory material. Insurers may have adopted, or may be in the process of adapting, an ISD insurance rating program that will provide rating credits to individual property insurance policies in recognition of community efforts to mitigate proper}' damage due to natural disasters. These insurers may use the Building Cade Effectiveness Grading Classification we have recentl.• dzveloped for your community as a basis far the credits used. While individual insurers may use different credits or different effective dates. the ISO program will apply credits to new construction within Hutchinson that has been issued a Certificate of Occupancy in the year 1998 and forward. \~ a have attached a copy of our repott. which will provide you additional information about our classitication process and how we have ¢raded various aspects of Four community`s building codes and their enforcement. We want to highlight the fact that the Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule is an insurance underwriting and information tool. It is not intended to analyze all aspects of a comprehensive building code enforcement program. it is not for purposes of determining compliance with any state yr local law nor is it for makin¢ property/casualty loss prevention or loss safety recommendations. ~Ai L J .n~ .gal. ~.aba.~au • w~~a JV.. July 1. 1999 Page 2. If you ha~'e any questions about the Classification that was developed, please let us know. Additionally; if you are planning on any future changes in your building codes or their enforcement. please advise us as these changes tray affect our analysis and your communin''s grading classification. 5incerel~'. .... - _..... ---- LCtdL John Coleman Field Representative Enclosure cc: Mark Hensen w/enclosure Building Code Effectiveness Classifications B~rilw~,~a~~d ~~aa~~~ztaaw~~~e~sic~ztl c~c~r~rr~er~~°~~lrc~~~~~ae gat all raa~n~rr~nunities have r~r~rrrprherrsi~e b~rildin c~atlesg nar der all. eramrnurrities entc~r°e their ccades with ual ce~rxaitment. "b"et the el~'ecti~eness ~~" lacal buildn„ eades a.atr have a ~arrwfr~rrnd' eiffect ran h~~v tlae str~ra:ttrres in a er~rninunity will per~"r~c~n in ~ hu.rris~:,a~~e- earthqualre, car trth~r° rratraral disaster. After 1` lurricarre ,;4~xdrew, phcttas taken in several parts e saxxth 1~lrarida shtrwd h~atrres crn ane side ofa street eazxr- pletel destroyed, while hwarnes ~n the Wither side we-re still. statrdiri~. dater inspcetzorais revealed that, lrr traany tsa:~es, cc~nstratetion caf the estr~aye+~ ~ruildins was well l~ thc~ standarrd r~t~ired lay the lattildixr c:aade it~r ef~°t. _~„d sGvcral itadustry stdies suggest that total losses xni~,ht have 17eerr as rrauc~ as ~`~ l'~,sws if all strre;rett~res %n the ~rr-e~. hail nret the huildin codes in eff`eet at the tune, l~ildin-code errfe~rer'~rr~rat aaa:t lr~rve n rrrajur irrt~luerice ears. the ecnr~tanrie~ well~l7ein~. ~:~f a nZt~izit;ipality anal the ~.afty o its eitlzens. T~~w c;~~rr }'1111 ~l~tc~r"t°rrib«; 1h{ ~1Y~e:titr~ex~~s rrf huildtrrg-ee~le enforeei~~ent n~,,~ar~~ a~c~r7~nruraity"~ ~lJl~ll~`l~ ~~~~bE I1~~F"~"1~;+C'T~'"~r'k'l'~ l~'ti5 (~~AiD~Nt "l"'he uildi~~g bode ~f~'ectiveness ~radt~g chedrrl~ (13~C1~"f r} is a classr~`i~ati~r~ system that r~reasres ~ildi~- ~~c ~nfreernent irr crrrrrmur~r~tlrws. aC) wor°ked with r~lr~ael~l-~~ode orgarrizatie~ns, inserrer grooip~;, ed~rc.atcrrs, and builds il3 g raf~"ieials t;e develcsp the sa hedrale,. l~"C.) is an irrdol~ur~~iLlft statisti~c,:al 1~,atl,i~., aid advistary s~rgarxi~atiot~ tlrtrt ~~xves to prr~perzW c,~.suafty irrstrrantxe i.radrrstry, 154; e~r11~_~t inf'e~rrnatcrn erg a corrrrunity's bui.leilrrg-code adoption ane~ c~nl~rc:e~rtre;rrt larae~tier~:s, ~rr~rly~es the el.r.a, Arad their ~i~signs a l~ile3irrf; Code :t~eetiveness t~,~1~~~i1~i:~;~,tucarr frt?r, 1 to !t}. ~"lsss 1' relarsrrts the rrresst f'av[rraL~1e classiffcatlc~rr ~"lC:tia can help e'valraate a era;~~7lr~,urrrty's l,,~a~lelirl,~ •er~:wrle ere~`G-~l~ rr~lcnt ser'vacc~s..l.'"h4 ~r,,~~ a~~~ provides c~h~jective, e~saurir, ~°irlc. ~;riteri;~ 1"err a~,~~r~~ ar>, ~~ ~ use lrerr t,,~ rat-lrxg artd brz~j`rtin.~, l`or' plan re°~rc ~, ir~~ptertiota ser`viees, prrhle- r-~latr+arr; ,c.tl~rrti~s, ~rne"3', tr~airrarr c t~~rt,s. +~~ 9~~dJ ~"~rc~~Z~arl'pes~, Ins:., 2C~4~~. r~e"~ Gs ~ r~~i~5r~~"~C9 @d'~~4dC~nrt rk I ~ ~i,~;~~ 6r~~. Communities with paarl'y ea#arcad b~ikdirmg cartes ~r~e a# greater r#sk #ar ecatratauc iris and etas#ra~tte-retate~~ ~dat~ege. City a#t~c~ats use the cam~~~retr.e an~aiy~is tsar the CEtm;~ r~tiarts #a sup,~iemen#. their ~3nd?rttanrwing at their huiliding•cade ea#arcement services. 1"~~r~~a L7istriibu~ki~m ~f ~"~~rtc~"a~an~itie~ iay~ ~C; C~i~s~ FJrre~ber ~rithd~ aw""Fs~r~f~[~~ara Pr~rt~l ~.iin c~ ~rtrii~l ~...irw `A`f~ ~~fsor~~i lir~~s ~I~ssit"c~ti~p~ addr€~~~s ~aiU~ing ~~d'e ~Yapti~sra rid ~~7~~~rr~wl"C1r~C~~ ~t~r 1- end ~ flrnily dwllings~ Tian ~eao'nirrwr~;~i ii~r,~ ~1,=.iri~„~ki~n 6s ~'~rr c~iil v~ht ~ u~ildir~~. ~.~W.~ _....~,._ .._...~ ._.._._~ .~_.~. ..~ ..~, - .._e ~_mwe...~,.....~.,.__.~..._.........~...._~... ......__...~ ......~..~,. ,,.. .~.~.w..~w_w_.., 4' .t~~ ~rd~~rrr~:i~±~ ~n"r~'~ ~Ci~l'~,~ '~"C~CO~, ~~.il P°#c~~ ~ ~ r~ _ ~r~~~~ ~~ . ~~ 64 "~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~1~'"^' W7w'~"~u`. ~ Sri"~ N"~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~.. ~ ~ '-,~ ~~~ ~ ~ 1' s~ ~,~Q~' 1 t~ { ? 1' ~"~a~~~tzM~w~ F~(~~ " (~`fls~~ ~NTRYWIC?E dsCri9ati~u ~t ~rr~rr~~rai~i~ Y 13~IF x ~:.II~ N~c~r~bcr rd~hr~ s~l~ssrfrc:~tr~d~ ~' aU Qi~1C~ ~ ~9!C9 1 N11rN~1 ~~ (C~ "1525 °~'~_ 5 1 X14 ~~ ss ~' u 1'~r ~svn~1 1..1rr 1A36~D1 937 ®arr~rr~~rci1 ~..~r~ '`°~C 1n~ 755 ~'1~+ 165 'T~t ~~r~s~r~aN h~~ el~s~1~N~~rklta~ ~~dtY~~~~ ~~GNdGn~ ~~aci~ cM~lati~~~ o~~~ em'~f~rceu-ra+~rrk fear ~.. rid -~a~rwNly ~llNing~„ "~'I'~~ c¢~rr~rr°p~r~cual Ni~~s I~of~ct'u~w~ N~ ~'~r aN d~t~~r tla!Nldar~~. ~....._ .._ _. .._.mm. -.-.-... -___..._ . -._-..-. m.---..--_ .,... -w..._.._..... ~.__... _...__- . ....... .. ._._ [ ~ l:~ua 6='ra~aN~i~~~, '~u~oW. .~I~kC~~1, '~~~k~~ VIII r~a~~~~~ rr~~~~w~~ ~w ,;, ~ Date: February 24, 2004 60-DAY REVIEW WAIVER I hereby agree to waive the 60-day timeline requirement set by MN State Statute • 15.99 on my request fora Conditional Use Permit at 56D and 57D Hillto Drive N.E dated 1123104 (Type of Application) (Date of Application) Crow River Habitat for Humanit Applicant's Name (Printed) ~/ . Applicant's 'nature ~/~/~ Date L z R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON . 9y Check Number AP Paymant Register with Voids Check Dates 2/13/2004 - Ck Date Type Check N Vendor Name Amount Void Amount 2/13/2004 PK 121273 " 101918 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 128.05 2/13/2004 PK 121274 104469 CZECH, RANDY 132.00 2/13/2004 PK 121275 119099 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF MINNESOTA 2,352-88 2/13/2004 PK 121276 108389 HUTCHINSON AUTO CENTER 47,852.00 2 /1 312 0 0 4 PK 121277 118442 LEVINE, ERIC 132.00 2/13/2004 PK 121278 103046 MCLEOD COUNTV RECORDER 35.00 2/13/2004 PK 127279 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 15.32 2/13/2004 PO 121280 102653 MINNESD7A DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 -804.09 2/1 312 00 4 PO 121201 102853 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 -804.09 2/13/2004 PO 121282 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 004.09 -804.09 2/13/2004 PO 121283 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL BD4.09 -804.09 2/13/2004 PO 121284 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 -804.09 2/1 312 0 0 4 Pb 121285 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 -804.09 2/13/2Dtl4 PO 121268 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL BD4.08 -804.09 2/13/2004 PO 121287 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 -804.09 2/13/2004 PK 121288 102649 MPCA 270.00 2/73/2004 PK 121289 102649 MPCA 270.00 2/13/2004 PK 121290 102649 MPCA 32.00 2/13/2004 PK 121281 102812 STANDARD PRINTING 100.11 2/13/2004 pK 121292 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 97.85 2/13/2004 PK 121293 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 89.57 2/17/2004 PK 121290. 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 2 /1 712 0 0 4 PK 121295 102853 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.08 2/17/2004 PK 121296 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 2/17/2004 PK 121297 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 804.09 61,133.86 -6,432,72 Account Num 61,133.86 -6,432.72 IMMEDIATE PAYS ~, R55APPYRV CITY DF HUTCHINSON B Check Number AP Pa ment Re ister with Voids Check Dat 2/18/2004 - Ck Date T e Check # Vendor Name Amount 2/18/2004 PK 121298 ` 119910 AUGESON, KEVIN 117.7D 2/18/2004 PK 121299 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 1,614.56 2/18/2004 PK 121300 1D2649 MPCA 145.00 2/18/20D4 PK 121301 102052 QUALITY W INE & SPIRITS CD. 9,427.29 2/18/2004 PK 121302 103832 RCH INC 79,264.84 2/18/2004 PK 121303 102747 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC 14,768.12 45,537.51 Account N ## 45,537.51 IMMEDIATE PAYS Void Amou r~ L.~ r~ R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON B Check Number AP Pa ment Re ist®r with Voids Gheck Dat 2/23/2004 - Ck Date T e Check # Vendor Name Amount 2/23/2004 PK 121304 * 102551 INSURANCE PLANNERS 115,DOO.DD 2/23/2004 PK 121305 119911 WELLS FARGO 1,500.00 2/23/2004 PK 121306 119911 WELLS FARGO 7,500.00 124,000.00 Account N ## 124,000.00 IMMEDIATE PAYS r~ L~ 1 PAYROLL ACCOUNT -February 20, 2004 Pericd Ending: February 14, 2004 FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY -ELECTRONIC TRANSFER TO STATE AND IRS DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE AMOUNT PEID ACCT# NAME $18,103.39 9995.2034 WITH. TAX ACCOUNT $9,767.13 9895.2040 $2,809.37 9995.2242 $30,879.89 Bub-Total -Employee Contribution $9,767.13 9995.2240 $2,609.37 9995.2242 $12,578.50 Sutr7otal -Employer Contribution $43,258.39 Grand Total -Withholding Tax Account DESCRIPTION Employee Contributicn -Federal Tax Employee Contribution -Soc. Security Employee Contribution -Medicare Employer Contribution -Social Security Employer Contribution -Medicare $8,426.98 8995.2035 MN DEPT DF REVENUE $10,172.37 102615 9995.2241 PERA $12,121.11 102615 9995.2241 $22,293.48 Sub-Tatel - PERA $15.86 102615 9995.2243 PERA-DCP $15.88 102615 9895.2241 $31.72 Sub -Total -DCP 522,325.20 GRAND TOTAL -PERA Employee Contribution -Pension Plan Employer Contribution -Pension Plan Employee Contribution -Pension Plan Employer Contribution -Pension Plan • • 1 Finance~Director Approval • E]~ECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS 2/24/04 WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF RF,VENIJE-USE TAX 7,012.00 GF,NERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUF,-SALES TAX 376.D0 ILA.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE-FUEL TAX 1,181.8D LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE-AUG SALES TAX 23,482.00 C, J R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON B Gheck Numher AP Pa ment Re ister with Voids Check Dat 2/24/2004 - Ck Date T e Check # Vendor Name Amount 2/24/2004 PK 121307 " 119455 A & E CONSTRUCTION SPECIALITIE 240.69 2/24/2004 PK 121308 102217 AEM MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC 1,091.45 2/24/2004 PK 121309 111041 ARROW TERMINAL LLC 181.05 2/24/2004 PK 121310 119364 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO 37,285.95 2/24/2004 PK 121311 119647 B. NELSON TRANSPORT, INC 280.00 2/24/2004 PK 121312 101916 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 201.20 2/24/2004 PK 121313 119938 BLACKWELL, DAN 60.00 2/24/2004 PK 121374 101987 BRANDON TIRE GO 17.20 2/24/2004 PK 121315 102136 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS 394.39 2/24/2004 PK 121316 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 40,448.10 2/24/2004 PK 121317 102251 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP 154.68 2/24/2004 PK 121318 104391 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 1,708.48 2/24/2004 PK 121319 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 180.76 2/24/2004 PK 121320 104163 CHIEF SUPPLY CORP 54.93 2/24/2004 PK 121321 110865 CHOICEPOIN7 SERVICES INC 58.00 2/24/2004 PK 121322 102179 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP 150.00 2/24/2004 PK 121323 105522 COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS & TRAD 335.00 2/24/2004 PK 121324 119919 CONSERVATION FUND #14172, THE 180.00 2/24/2004 PK 121325 102484 CORPORATE EXPRESS 138.60 2/24/2004 PK 121326 102219 CRC PRESS LLC 86.95 2/24/2004 PK 121327 102050 CROW RIVER AUTO 252.19 2/24/2004 PK 121328 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 283.00 2/24/2004 PK 721329 102121 CROW RIVER VET CLINIC 398.47 2/24/2004 PK 121330 104884 CULLIGAN 26.50 2/24/2004 PK 121331 10218fi CULLIGAN WATER GOND 220.00 2/24/2004 PK 121332 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4,439.35 2/24/2004 PK 121333 102fi98 DEVRIES, RANpY 187.45 2/24/2004 PK 121334 119939 DEX MEDIA, INC 281.49 2/24/2004 PK 121335 113181 DROP-N-GO SHIPPING, INC 28.92 2/24/2004 PK 121336 102726 ECOLAB PEST ELIM 43.67 2/24/2004 PK 121337 119796 ELLEFSON, TIM 126.00 2/24/2004 PK 121338 105529 ENDRES, JIM 60.00 2/24/2004 PK 121339 102360 ERLANDSON, BEN 75.00 2/24/2004 PK 121340 102223 FARM-RITE EQUIPMENT 237.91 2/24/2004 PK 121341 118458 FARNAM, KELLI 84.00 2/24/2004 PK 121342 119795 FERNHOLZ, KELLY 63.00 2/24/2004 PK 121349 105645 FIRE ENGINEERING 49.50 2/24/2004 PK 121344 102738 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN pF MN 10.00 2/24/2004 PK 121345 107529 FLEET COMPUTING INTERNATIONAL 500.00 2/24/2004 PK 121346 101945 GALL'S INC 84.14 2/24/2004 PK 121347 119914 GETCHELL, TROY 70.00 2/24/2004 PK 121348 102525 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC 11.50 2/24!2004 PK 121349 119918 GRACE LUTHERAN CHURCH 150.00 2/24/2004 PK 121350 111229 GREIVE, BARRY 200.00 2/24/2004 PK 121351 101874 GRILLS & COOPER & CO 12,749.92 2/24/2004 PK 127352 113327 GROWERTALKS 52.00 2/24/2004 PK 121353 108668 GRUFRUFF DESIGN 1,264.08 2/24/2004 PK 121354 102528 HALER JEWELRY INC. 89.84 L_J ~ ~ ~J l__J 2/24/2004 PK 121355 102451 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE 2,725.30 2/24/2D04 PK 121356 1D4257 HARPER BROOMS 565.68 2/24/2004 PK 121357 110208 HAWKEYE ENTERPRISES, INC 26,756.95 2/24/2004 PK 121358 119923 HAYDEN, KAY 18.00 2/24/2004 PK 121359 iD2546 HCVN-TV 5,510.06 2/24/2004 PK 1213fi0 1D4883 HENKE FLOOR CARE 372.75 2!24/2004 PK 121361 102531 HENRYS FOODS INC 298.68 2/24/2004 PK 121362 101915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 124.67 2/24/2004 PK 1213fi3 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE/HUTCHINSON 1,010.44 2!24/2004 PK 121364 1D2119 HOLT MOTORS INC 57.46 2/24/2004 PK 121365 119916 HUTCH BASKETBALL ASSN 140.00 2/24/2004 PK 121366 102544 HUTCH CAFE 126.00 2/24/2004 PK 121367 102319 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE 1,146.75 2/24/2D04 PK 121368 105329 HUTCHINSON BUMPER TO BUMPER 48.62 2/24/2004 PK 121369 102530 HUTCHINSON CO-OP 94.17 2/24/2004 PK 121370 101956 HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPT RELIEF AS 450.00 2/24/2004 PK 121371 102539 HUTCHINSON MANUFACTURING 6,993.00 2/24/2D04 PK 121372 102540 HUTCHINSON PLUMBING & HEATING 388.00 2/24/2D04 PK 121373 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO 1,098.43 2/24/2004 PK 121374 102072 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 26,284.00 2/24/2004 PK 121375 103099 HUTGHINSON, CITY OF 1,696.74 2/24/2004 PK 121376 102779 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST_ #423 18,163.24 2/24/2004 PK 121377 103520 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 198.99 2/24/2D04 PK 121378 119924 INTIME SOLUTIONS INC 224.00 2/24/2004 PK 121379 102062 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 105.55 2/24/2004 PK 121360 111836 JACOBSEN, SEPTEMBER 24.85 2/24/2D04 PK 121381 102553 JCPENNEY CO 149.94 2/24/2004 PK 121382 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 4.65 2/24/2004 PK 121383 102652 JERRYS TRANSMISSION 8,212.93 2/24/2004 PK 121384 719782 JESCO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, INC 2,215.00 2/24/2004 PK 121385 102556 JOSS SPORT SHOP 13.85 2/24/2004 PK 121386 107938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 11,759.07 2/24/2004 PK 121387 105436 JOHNSON, DIANE 40.00 2/24/2004 PK 121388 102346 JOHNSON, LEONARD G. 812.76 2/24/2004 PK 121389 102555 JUUL CONTRACTING CO 400.00 2/24/2004 PK 121390 104999 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE 383.10 2/24/2004 PK 121391 103906 KIESE=R, SUE 825.00 2/24/2004 PK 121392 104575 KLITZKE, LUKE 85.00 2/24/2004 PK 121393 113940 KLITZKE, RICHARD 45.00 2/24/2004 PK 121394 104292 KOBOW, BECKY 60.00 2/24/2004 PK 121395 104416 KOHLS SWEEPING SERVICE 2,160.00 2/24/2004 PK 121396 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO 11.54 2/24/2004 PK 121397 101991 LAKES GAS CO. 714.61 2/24/2004 PK 121398 104259 LANG'S OLD FASHIONED MEAT MARK 157.92 2/24/2004 PK 121399 101974 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC 1,961.20 2/24/2004 PK 121400 101984 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 25,096.30 2/24/2004 PK 121401 102564 LOGIS 45,749.00 2/24/2004 PK 121402 102571 MACOUEEN EQUIP ING 13$.64 2/24/20D4 PK 121403 102688 MADSON, STEVEN 1,064.76 2/24/2004 PK 121404 102572 MANKATO MOBILE RADIO 490.88 2/24/2004 PK 121405 119066 MAXWELL'S INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 115.21 2/24/2004 PK 121406 119922 MAY, MANDY 25.00 L. 2/24/2004 PK 121407 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 855.04 2/24/2004 PK 121408 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 450.00 2/24/2004 PK 121409 103046 MCLEOD GDUNTY RECORDER 220.00 2/24/2004 PK 121410 118072 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 320.00 2/24/2004 PK 121411 112400 MENARDS - HUTCHINSON 312.67 2/24/2004 PK 121412 101840 MEYER-CENTURY LABS 275.27 2/24/2004 PK 121413 119917 MEYERS, BECKY 40.00 2/24/2004 PK 121414 108663 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 76.68 2/24/2004 PK 121415 102425 MIDWESTWIRELESSCOMM. 1,406.68 2/24/2004 PK 121416 119912 MIELKE, AARON 75.00 2/24/2004 PK 121417 105274 MINNBLUE DIGITAL IMAGING 165.13 2/24/2004 PK 121418 119858 MINNEAPOLIS, CITY OF 15,052.50 2/24/2004 PK 121419 101947 MINNESOTA DEPT DF LAeOR & INDU 10.00 2/24/2004 PK 121420 102846 MINNESOTA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATI 338.11 2/24/2004 PK 121421 1p2582 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 86.94 2/24/2004 PK 121422 105157 MINNESOTA SHREDDING 73.26 2/24/2004 PK 121423 102570 MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION 525.00 2/24/2004 PK 121424 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB 731.00 2/24/2004 PK 121425 104454 MINNESOTA'S BOOKSTORE 22.25 2/24/2004 PK 121426 119921 MORPHEW, MOLLY 15.00 2/24/2004 PK 121427 102850 NCL 312.51 2/24/20p4 PK 121428 116854 NEMITZ, MARY 5.00 2/24/2004 PK 121429 115871 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,491.01 2/24/2004 PK 121430 112162 NORTHERN SAFETY CO., INC 88.27 2/24/2004 PK 121431 102591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 106.85 2/24/2004 PK 121432 119452 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL GORP 96.17 2/24/2004 PK 121433 102490 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 1,208.33 2/24/2004 PK 121434 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 76.02 2/24/2004 PK 121435 119915 OUR SAVIOR SCHOOL 70.00 2/24/2004 PK 121436 102187 PAUSTIS & SONS W INE CO 2,395.54 2/24/2004 PK 121437 101853 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 7,795.96 2/24/2004 PK 121438 102373 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 902.71 2/24/2004 PK 121439 102167 PITNEY BOW ES 1,458.00 2/24/2004 PK 121440 103919 POWDER RIDGE SKI CORP 5,229.00 2/24/2004 PK 121441 102457 PRCE 203.60 2/24/2004 PK 121442 102493 PREMIERTEGH PACKAGING 605.66 2/24/2004 PK 121443 102598 QUADE ELEGTRIC 78.81 2/24/2004 PK 121444 119937 QUALITY ANALYTICAL LABORATORIE 465.00 2/24/2004 PK 121445 102599 QUALITY TRANSPORTATION 87.00 2/24/2004 PK 121446 102052 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. 3,995.29 2/24/2004 PK 121447 102398 R & R EXCAVATING 9,758.90 2/24/2004 PK 121448 103040 RADISSON HOTEL ST. PAUL 357.08 2/24/2004 PK 121449 1p4941 RANGER TRUCK PARTS 12.77 2/24/2004 PK 121450 102384 RDO EQUIPMENT 24,050.00 2/24/2004 PK 121451 103830 RELIABLE 15.62 2/24/2004 PK 121452 102225 RUNNING'S SUPPLY 75.96 2/24/2004 PK 121453 105081 RUTLEDGE, LENNY 10.32 2/24/2004 PK 121454 105206 SAGE PUBLICATIONS 25.00 2/24/2004 PK 121455 102621 SALTMAN. THE 43.67 2/24/2004 PK 121456 1 p2436 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 70$.01 2/24/2004 PK 121457 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 1,715.70 2/24/2004 PK 121458 109801 SCOTT'S WINDOWS 26.63 ~~ C~ 2/24/2004 PK 121459 101892 SEH 799.54 2/24/2004 PK 121460 103800 SENN, RUTH 36.00 2/24/2004 PK 121461 108656 SENTRY FIRE PROTECTION INC 382.64 2/24/2004 PK 121462 102605 SEWING BASKET 107.03 2/24/2004 PK 121463 102609 $HOPKO 35.71 2/24/2004 PK 121464 119920 SMITHERS, DOREEN 15.00 2/24/2004 PK 121465 102204 SOIL CONTROL LAB 2,396.00 2/24/2004 PK 121466 105064 SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL 23,386.68 2/24/2004 PK 121467 102242 SRF CONSULTING GROUP 3,221.59 2/24/2004 PK 121468 107533 ST. ANASTASIA CHURCH 70.00 2/24/2004 PK 121469 104517 $T. CLOUD OVERHEAD DOOR CO 252.56 2/24/2004 PK 121470 102612 STANDARD PRINTING 175.73 2/24/2004 PK 121471 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 55.90 2/24/2004 PK 121472 105280 STATE TREASURER 35.00 2/24/2004 PK 121473 119159 TOTAL FIRE PROTECTION 134.72 2/24/2004 PK 121474 102620 TRI CO WATER 94.28 2/24/2004 PK 121475 102454 TRI-COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 365.52 2/24/2004 PK 121476 109289 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 2,595.29 2/24/2004 PK 121477 102619 TWO WAY GOMM INC 54.45 2/24/2004 PK 121478 118166 UNIQUE TOOL INC 20.00 2/24/2004 PK 121479 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 153.85 2/24/2004 PK 1214$0 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 353.80 2/24/2004 PK 121481 119913 USFILTE=R DAVIS PRODUCTS 8,436.93 2/24/2004 PK 121482 102419 VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON 420.34 2/24/2004 PK 121483 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 657.75 2/24/2004 PK 121484 101857 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 60.07 2/24/2004 PK 121485 104027 VULCAN INC 1,012.50 2/24/2004 PK 121486 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 2,120.54 2/24/2004 PK 121487 102929 WEIS, MARK 166.87 2/24/2004 PK 121488 102165 WELCOME NEIGHBOR 60.00 2/24/2004 PK 121489 110738 WESTMOR INDUSTRIES, LLC 13.63 2/24/2004 PK 121490 103452 W INE COMPANY, THE 2,148.00 2/24/2004 PK 121491 119211 WORK CONNECTION, THE 2,487.87 2/24/2004 PK 121492 103980 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS 478.29 2/24/2004 PK 121493 105571 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO 230.30 2/24/2004 PK 121494 101876 AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. 935.00 2/24/2004 PK 121495 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 118.16 2/24/2004 PK 121496 101875 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. 300.00 2/24/2004 PK 121497 101872 H.R.L.A.P.R. 265.69 2/24/2004 PK 121498 itl2633 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 6,592.22 2/24/2004 PK 121499 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 507.4fi 2/24/2004 PK 121500 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 3,628.84 2/24/2004 PK 121501 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 435.15 2/24/2004 PK 121502 101$77 PRUDENTIAL 75.00 2/24/2004 PK 121503 102096 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 452,041.69 Account N # 452,041.69 ~J