The URL can be used to link to this page

cp10-26-2004 cAGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL . TUESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P M 2. INVOCATION -Rev. Todd Ertsgaard, Oak Heights Covenant Church 3. PLEbGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4, MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 13, 2004 Action -Motion to approve as presented 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF DFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MINUTES FROM TUNE 17 AND JULY 22, 2004 2. ATRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES FROM JULY 20, 2004 3. HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 4• BUII,bING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2004 5. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 6. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR REFUSE, COMPOST, WATER, WASTEWATER AND GENERAL FUNDS FOR SEPTEMBER 20D4 7. CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2D04 8. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2004 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 12541 -RESOLUTION APPRQVING CERTIFICATION OF ASSESSMENTS (c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. CONSiDE.RATION OF VARIANCES REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER TO INCREASE TWIN IIOME LOT COVERAGE ON TWO LOTS 1N THE SOUTHWIND PLAT LOCATED AT 230/234 AND 245/249 OTTAWA AVENUE SE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION ANp FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NOS. 12539 ANb 12540) Action -Motion to approve consent agenda 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. -NONE 7. COMMUNICATIONS RE UESTS AND PETITION5 CITY CpUNCIL AGENDA -OCTOBER 26, lDD4 ,1!!~'~ ) 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ~ ~1`' 9, NEW BUSINESS ~\l (a) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE N0.04-0389 - AN ORDINANCE REGULATING MOTORIZED SCOOTERS (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR NOVEMBER 9, 2004) Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (b) CONSIDERTTON OF PRELIMINARY PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS HUTCHINSON SENIOR CAMPUS, REZONING FROM R1 TO R4 AND C4 AND A PLANNED DEVELOMENT DISTRICT LOCATED ON HWY 15 SOUTH WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (WANE FIItST READING AND SET SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE N0.04-390 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 12537) Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY LEE STRITESKY TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 36' X 24' GARAGE IN THE FRONT YARD LOCATED AT 1005 LEWIS AVENUE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. I2538) Action -Motion to reject _ Motion to approve (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REVISING TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FEE SCHEDULE Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR HOMIER DISTRIBUTING ON NOVEMBER 30 AND DECEMBER 1, 2004, AT THE NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (fl CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF GENERATOR PURCHASE Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING BUDGET INFORMATIONAL MEETIlVGS FOR 4:15 F.M. ON NOVEMBER 9 AND NOVEMBER 23, 2004 Action -Motion to reject -Motion to approve (h) CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS COMMENCING LITIGATION AGAINST ALLIED MECHANIC SYSTEMS i 10.1~TISCEL EOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS - -- - °__..._ ._.. _ _-,.-- ---.._., _. _. _ .. _ .. _.. _ 11. CLAIMS APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS 12. ADJOURN ~ 1 ~~a~~ U~ ~C`~~ ~~u. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. ayor ar m Torgerson ca e t e meeting to order. Members present were Kay Peterson, Tim Haugen, Casey Stotts and Bill Arndt. Others present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Marc Sebora, City Attorney and john Rodeberg, Director of Public Works. 2. INVOCATION -Rev. Todd Ertsgaard, Oak Heights Covenant Church, delivered the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 28.2004 Minutes were approved as presented. 5. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1 • PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 13, 2004 2. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM EXPENSE REPORT FOR AUGUST 2004 3. HUTCHINSON LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM JULY 26, 2004 4. FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2004 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. RESOLUTION NO. 12533 -RESDLUTIONESTABLISHING INCOME GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS FOR SENIOR & DISABLED CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND SENIOR & DISABLED CITIZENS REDUCED REFUSE RATE 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12534 -RESOLUTION ACTIVATING DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS (c) REAPPDINTMENT OF JACK SANDBERG TO THE PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD TO DECEMBER 2007 (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AMENDED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS ALONG TRUNK HIGHWAY 15 (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL QF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THOMAS PARKER, FIXED BASE OPERATOR, FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AT HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIltPORT Motion by Peterson, second by Amdt, to approve consent agenda. Motion carried unanimously. 6. PUBLIC.HEARINGS -NONE COMMUNICATIONS RE(~iJESTS AND PETITIONS ~a~ CITY COCTNCIL AGENDA - OCTpBER 13, 2004 (a) UPDATE ON CREEKSIDE SOILS COMPOST FACILITY Steve Madson, General Manager of Creekside Soils, presented before the Council. Mr. Madson introduced Jeff Meehan, Sales and Marketing Consultant. Mr. Meehan gave a history of how he began to become involved with Creekside Soils. Mr. Meehan explained that the first year of production, 2002, was a struggle for the compost Facility due to operation beginning late in the season. A mere 4500 bags of product were sold. In 2003, sales grew tremendously. In 2004, more products were introduced and sales have now reached over 830,000 bags. Creekside products are used across several states and sold in a multitude of avenues. 2005 is projected for sales to grow even more. Beyond 2006, several opportunities exist to gain more market share. Mayor Torgerson made note that the bags collected from various cities will not be stored along Adams Street as they were m the past. Mayor Torgerson also shared that the facility is actually attempting to keep up with product requests. Steve Madson, General Manager, presented before the Council. Mr. Madson explained recent improvements that have been made to the facility. These improvements include constructing an asphalt parking lot, static pile conceppt, mulch storage, bag redesign, and a new computer system. The yard waste received from Minneapolis will now be stored on the £az most west side of the facility that fs out of the genetal public's eye. Issues for the site include grinding plastics, inventory storage, high fuel costs, and increasing the production of the blending line to 12 months a year. The forecast For 2005 sales is projected at a net profit of $150,000. The forecast for 2006 sales is projected at a net profit of $500,000. Mr. Madson commended Compost Site Coordinator, Doug Johnson, and other staff' for the outstanding job they have done at the facility. Mr. Madsen expplained that approximately 20 truckloads come into the facility a day, doting the busy season it can be up to 50 truckloads a day. The facility currently has 15-20 major customers. Mr. Madson also explained that runoff from the materials does not drain into the pending area, but rather into the sanitary sewer system. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 12467 APPROVING VACATION OF PORTION OF NORTH PARK (LOCATION OF PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE) See agenda item 9(e). 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTION JUDGE WAGE INCREASE Mayor Torgerson noted that vur current election judges have been paid minimum wage for the past several years. Mayor Torgerson asked that city staff conduct a survey to see what other cities pay. Based upon the results, an increase in pay is being requested. Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, to approve election judge wage increase to $6.50/hour for regular judges and $7.25/hour for head election judges. Motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT FOR FENCE NEAR NORTHWOODS PARK John Rodeberg, Aitector of Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg explained that a specific piece of property has continual trespassing of snowmobiles and vehicles. The property owner is requesting that a split rail fence be constructed where the City has placed posts. This agenda item request is to set a public hearing for October 26, 2004, to discuss this franchise. Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to set public hearing for 6:00 p.m. on October 26, 2004. Motion 2 ~ ~~~ CITY COUNCIL AGEND.9 - t7CTpBER 13, 2004 carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT VALUE ENGINEERING PROPOSALS John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg stated that because of the construction of the new water plant, rt has been discussed to have several consultants be brought into the project as a team to review specific areas of the project. This team will then report to the main consultant on the project to discuss changes and enhancements. Four separate consultants are being recommended. They include Dale Folen of the City of Minneapolis, Chris Caiffin of Howard R. Green, Dr. Herman Dharamgjah of Bolton & Menk and James Garber of FTC&H. The total of these contracts totals $22,000. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve entering into agreements with consultants to review water treatment plant project. Motion tamed unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING DATE IN DECEMBER FOR JOINT MEETING BETWEEN CTTY COUNCIL AND HUTCHINSON UTILITiE5 FOR ANNUAL UPDATE Gary Plotz stated that the Utilities is recommending that the meeting be held the first half of December. This update will discuss cunent and future projects. Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to set joint meeting with Hutchinson Utilities Commission for December 9, 2004, at 4:15 p.m. at the Event Center. Motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 423 FOR THE.RETURN OF PARK LAND (LOCATION OF PARK ELEMENTARY SITE) Mayor Torperson explained that a Park Elementary Committee has been meeting for the last eight weeks to discuss the issue of the City of Hutchinson vacating the Park Elementary property. Mayor Torgerson read . from the proposed agreement the intention of the agreement. The main intention rs to revert the property back to park land eventually. The agreement describes how the vacation will take place and what will happen if the school district vacates the property. Ultimately, if the school district vacates the building, the property reverts back to the City of Hutchinson. Marc Sebora, Gity Attorney, presented before the Council. Mr. Sebora showed a survey of the original property that was requested to be vacated. This survey shows that the school district had requested additional property surrounding the school be vacated m order to square off the property for zoning purposes. Mr. Sebora then showed a new survey of the property that is now being considered for vacation. This survey shows that basically it's the property that the school is currently sitting which includes two parcels that were original] deeded and then the portion of the building that was added on to the west side in the 19SOs and will not include the piece of land on the far south side of the building which was originally requested. Mayor Torgersan noted that if this agreement and resolution is passed, the school will have no future opportunity to occupy any more portions of this land. Mayor Torgerson also noted that once the building is no longer used for educational pur~vses, the building reverts to the City. Marc Sebora also informed the graoap that if a portion of the building is demolished, that portion of the property must revert back to park Discussion was held regarding setbacks. The discussion centered around the fact that setbacks don't necessarily apply tv this property because it is the only property on the block and no other structures can be built on the block. Marc Sebora explained that the resolution has been revised to illustrate the new legal description as portrayed on the new survey. Also a change was made to the legal description of the area in the agreement that refers to the parking lot on the property. Marc Sebora informed the Council that he is certain that the Council has authority to vacate this property by state statute and city charter. ~ ~~~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -OCTOBER /3, 2004 Council Member Stotts asked if the Council could grant a franchise to the school district for the building. Mr. Sebora stated that the City could do that, bat that is not the school district's request or intention. Scott Nokes, School bistnict Boazd Member, presented before the Council, Mr. Nokes explained that the school district's request for the City to vacate the property is basically to clear up title issues. The main intention is to revert this property back to park land. Mr. Nokes also stated that because there are title issues, it causes restrictions for the school district. Mr. Nokes Further stated that a franchise agreement has restrictions pn it, which the school district is not requesting, The school district is asking the City tv consider vacating the dedicated portion of park land that Park Elementary is cturently sitting on. Upon Counci] Member Stotts's request, Marc Sebora explained how the school district could use the school via a franchise agreement. Mr. Sebora stated that a franchise agreement allows public property to be used for a private purpose: The City Charter allows for franchises to be granted for a maximum of2b years. The School Distnet's main concern is the title issues. A franchise agreement does not clear up title issues as the land will still be in the City's name. Mr. Nokes explained that the main goal of the school district is to have clear title to the property. A franchise agreement does not allow for clear title to the property. Mayor Torgerson noted that the Committee spoke about granting a franchise at almost every meeting. Council Member Stotts asked if a franchise agreement could also encompass the land reverting to the City once it is not used by the school any longer. Marc Sebora stated it could, but again, the School Board would not be in agreement with having a franchise granted to them. Sandy McCormick presented before the Council. Ms. McCormick stated that she was a part of the committee and voted against the City vacating this property and she thinks the school district should take the City to court and have a judge decide the vacation. Ms. McCormick read soveral attorney's opinions on the vacation of this property. These opinions declazed that the property could not be vacated. Ms, McCvmrick expressed that she strongly feels the City should grant a franchise to the school district and not vacate the property. Marc Sebora stated that soma of the attorney's opinions mentioned relate to specific purposes. Bridgett Feller, 26 Grove Street, presented before the Council. Ms. Feller asked of the school district why they aze spending money to have cleaz title decided when it will revert to pazk land anyway. Mr. Nokes stated that the school district does not want an risks associated with to whom owns the property. Money could he a problem for capital improvements if the property remains as it currently is (i.e. trust of the City). Improvement projects could be halted iCa citizen raises an issue as to the school sitting on dedicated park land. Council Member Peterson asked if this vacation is denied, what is the bottom line. Maze Sebora stated that if the agreement is approved, it allows control of the destiny of the property. If the Council denies the vacation re uest, the chovl District will go to Court to have a judge decide the title issues and the City then has little to no control of the future of the property. Steve Cook, 728 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Cook explained that the legal opinions mentioned only add confusion to the issue. Mr. Cook added further explanation to the legal opinions Ms. McCormick referenced. Mr. Cook informed the Council that these legal opinions contradict each other. Council Member Stotts stated that he recalls the major concerns of the last public hearing was what would happen when the school is no longer used as a school. The proposed agreement seems to answer those questtons. Motion by Arndt, second by Stotts, tv approve Resolution No. 12467 vacating the Park Elementary property. A rol l call vote was taken. Haugen -aye; Arndt -aye; Peterson -nay; Stotts -aye; Torgerson - aye. Motion carried 4 to 1. ~. MISCELLANEOUS 4 ~~ ~~~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -OCTOBER 13, 2004 (a) COMMU7VICATIONS . 1. DISCUSSION OF MOTORIZED SCOOTER ORDINANCE ban Hatton, Director of Emergency Services, presented before the Council. Mr. Hatton asked that discussion be held regarding motonzed scooters. Mr. Hatton explained what a motorized scooter is. These scooters can operate up to 20 mph. Mr. Hatton explained that he has concerns regarding that the scooters are completely unregulated. The can be ridden by anyone of any age with no equipment required. Mr. Hatton proposed a draft ordinance that prohibits motorized scooters from city streets, sidewalks and trails. Overall, other cities that do regulate these scooters prohibit them entirely. Mr. Hatton would like the Council to entertain considenng an ordinance. Mayor Torgerson did question whether or not motorized devices for the handicapped would be included in this ordinance. Mr. Hatton seemed to think that those types of devices would be exempt. The Council stated that this item could be considered at a future council meeting at a public hearing. Motion byy Peterson, second by Amdt, to set public hearing to discuss motorized scooter ordinance for October 26, 2004, at 6:00 p.m. Motion carved unanimously. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 12535 AND 1253b John Rodeberg explained that at a previous Council meeting the purchase ofproperty from First Federal was appproved for ponding. Part of the agreement was that the assessments would be removed from First Federal's tax roll. The assessments were inadvertently included on the last assessment roll approved and a revised assessment rolls needs to be approved. Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, to approve revised assessment roll. Motion carried unanimously. 3. CONSDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF VFW AUXILIARY GAMBLING LICENSE This license was brought to the City Center today and the applicant asked that the Council consider it at tonight's meeting. The gambling event will be held November 24, 2004, at the VFW. Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson to approve. Motion carried unanimously. Marc 5cbora - Mr. Sebora mentioned that G. Barry Anderson was sworn in today as Supreme Court Justice. The ceremony was very nice and many comments were related to Anderson's strong ties to the City of Hutchinson. Gary Plotz - Mr. Plotz mentioned that he and other council members and staff had attended the League ofMinnesota Cities Conference this past week. One idea that he had brought back from the Conference was from something the city of St. Peter currently does. In order to better communicate with the public, St. Peter city officials and staff hold one to two informal meetings a year where the public can come in and meet the officials and staff and ask questions. Mr. Plotz suggested Hutchinson doing something similar and perhaps coordinating it with the City's sesquicentennial celebration. The Council was in agreement with this idea. 11. CI.,AIM5 APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMIwNTS Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to pay claims, appropriations and contracts. Motion carried unanimously. 12. ADJOURN With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m, ~,~Q) The June 17, 2004 meeting of the Pioneerland Library system in the Willmar Public Literary Meeting Room was preceded by a dintter honoring Kathy Matson, who is retiring firm her position as Assistant Director of the PLS. As a thank you, Chair Jahn Baker presented Kathy with a gift of money form the board members. Chair Baker called the meeting to order at 7:15 pm. A quorum was present. He appointed Joan Reckdahl as secretary pro tem. Zeth Lietzan, an intern working on automation and Latino outreach projects, was introduced, Chair Baker also recognised two head librazians, who were them as union representatives, Pat Citta from Benson and .Fay Helms from Kerkhoven. He also welcomed two new board nnembers, Barbara Jean Nelson of Benson and Angie Larson of Ortonville. After two additions and a change in the order of the agenda, it was approved in a motion by Jeff Lopez, second by Dan Reigstad. Vern Silvetroale /Eric Weiberg moved to approve the May minutes. Motion passed. Garrison Hale introduced three representatives from the Southwest Central Service Co-op, a health insurance pool with Slue Cross being the insurance provider at the present time. Richard Ford presented documents comparing the benefits of the plan PLS presently has (FE)P 15/100) with the benefits ofAG W / COPAY (Blue Cross). He also distributed sheets showittg the costs of the various plans ftom both providers Vern Silvernale moved that we join the Co-op effective August 1, 2004. And accept the bid for $15/100% (Health Plan #4) through 12-31-05. Dean Schack seconded. Motion passed. Garrison Hale trtoved to make a formal cancellation of our previous medical plan effective July 31, 2004. Second by Vern Silvernale_ Motion to appoint Director john Houlahan as our official ' ~'SOII Hale moved Setzepfandt seconded. Motion passed, representative to the Co-op board, peal Garrison Hale, for the Personnel Committee, moved to authorize the employment of Dustin Stretch in Madison and lva Lou Gillespie in C'rraceville. Second by Dean Schack. Motion passed. Volunteers were requested to fill the vacancy in the personnel Committee caused by the resignation of Lowell Cleland. Sarah Groves-Speece volunteered, and her nominatipn was seconded by Herb Rotunda and approved by a vote of the board. Eric Weiberg, speaking for the Finance Committee, utoved approval ofthe May, 2004, financial report. Amy Wilde seconded. Motion passed, Weiberg also moved to pay bills and approve the check register as presented. Jeff Lopez seconded. Motion passed. Weiberg moved that we approve the West Central Co-op Delivery Service Contract. Seconded by Dan Reigstad. Motion passed. ~c~~ Weiberg also moved that we approve the revised 2004 budget. Amy Wilde seconded. Motion passed, On a request from Neva ICamrath, future orientation meetings for new board members will be open to present board members who desire a refresher course on the PLS budget. Weiberg moved, Barbara Jean Nelson seconded, approval of the PLS 2D05 budget, which recommends an average increase of 3% for each signatory, Motion passed. Weiberg moved approval of the Regional Library Basic Support Program (RLBSS) Fiscal Year 2005. Garrison Hale seconded, Motioa passed, Weiberg moved approval of the Position Description of Administrative Specilist, a part-time replacement for some of Kathy Matron's duties. Seconded by Diane $cek. Motioa passed. Weiberg moved that the PLS board pay for the meals of board members at the annual awards night dinner held in April Second by Garrison Hale. Motion passed. Garrison Hale, speaking for the Negotiations Committee, summarized the health insurance issues per the negotiations contract. He also said that it wouki be necessary to have a full board meeting in July to consider the new etaployee/employer contract. Chair Baker appointed the following board members to an ad hoc committee on library goals: Neva Kamrath, Mary Huesing, Stacey Schuette, Garrison Hale, and Dean Schuck. Vent Silvernale moved, Angie Larson seconded, approval of the committee membership. Gamson Hale reported on the Performance Evaluation of the PLS director. The director's performance exceeded expectations in most areas (e.g. Communications, Public Relations, Planning, Human Relations). Hale recommended a three-year Strategic Plan including goals for the library system and for the library director. This would help in the process of evaluation. Hale also recommended that the director should meet with the evaluation committee. In the Director's Report, John Houlahan reported a good recovery from surgery to donate a kidney. Our next full board meeting will be held July 22. Vern Silvetvale /Garrison Hale moved adjournment. Motion passed. Respectfully submitted, Joan Reckdahl, Secretary Pro Tem S~~J ~ The July 22 2004 meeting of the Pioneerland Liary System Board was called to order by Vice Chair Garrison Hale at 7:35 pm in the Willmar Public Library Meeting Room. We have a quorum, Guests present are Villa Lippert and Cindi Hendrixx. Eric Weiberg added VA,5 RLTA, VA..6 Litchfield Designated Book fund and V.A.7 MN Library Assoc, . Conference and C. Non-union health benefits and Union heaHh benefits. Dean Schuck motioned to approve the agenda as amended, Second by Amy Wilde. Carried. Jeff Lozez motioned to approve the June 17, 2004 minutes. Second by Dan Reigatad. Carried, Eric Weiberg presented for the Finance Committee, Weiberg motioned to approve the June 2004 Financial report. Second by Jeff Lopez. Carried. Weiberg motioned to approve the bilb and check register, Second by AI Clouse. Carded. Garrison Hale presented information on the new budget process. Weiberg motioned to approve the renewal of the Ridgewater CollegefPLS work study agreement. Second by Gary Johnson. Carried. In this agreement, PLS hires a student from that institute and pays 25% of their wages, the valance coming from the college. We are in the 3b year of the 5 year RLTA grant which funds our telecommunications. Weiberg motioned to approve the RLTA grant for 20042005. Second by AI Clouse. Carried. Discussion followed. Weiberg motioned to establish the Litchfield Designated Book Fund. Second by Pam Dille. Carried, This fund is from Litchfield dollars. The MN Library Association Conference will be in October in Duluth. Weiberg motioned to approve attendance by Director Houlahan and one other staff member. Second by Dean Shuck, Carried. Mary Millard will be the other attendee. Garrison Hale presented for the Ne gotiaGon Committee. He described the process offine-tuning the union agreement from 2003 to 2004-2005. The current contract seniority list Appendix 8 last line is changed to read Local 1826, not 183fi. This document goes with the main union contract document for approval. Hale reviewed the changes from last year to present and went over the health care options allowed by the new contract. Dean Shuck motioned to accept the now contract. Second by Vem 51h-amala. Carried. The libradans present informed the board that the union has also voted to accept the contract. Eric Weiberg explained how MSA (insurance) accounts work and the need for the non-union employees to have the same health insurance plan as the union employees. There is also a need to put the non-union employees on approximately the same pay scale as the union employees in order to comply with pay equity, Ivey Vonderharr motioned to approve a 5.63fhr (the rate can vary slightly depending on placement an salary schedule) increase through 2005 for non-union employees plus the name hsaRh benefits as union employees on contract for 2004 - 2005. Second by Paul Setzepfandt. Carried. There will be no step increases with this new wage. And it will be retroactive to Jan. '04 as is the Union contract. Director Houlahan said that we have a candidate for head librarian in Willmar who will be starting August 2^". Ivey Vondarharr motioned to approve the appointment of Laurie Ortega as head Librarian in Willmar. Second by Dan Reigstad. Carried. There was same discussion on board attendance. Director Houlahan introduced Mary Millard to the board. Mary is currently working on a grant and will continue to do this wodc and take aver a number of Itathy's duties, Stacey Schuette presented for the Ad Hoc Goals/Evaluatloncommlttee. Reviewed the direction the committee plans td go regarding evaluation of the director and the hoard and presented some areas of Importance that need to be addressed. Old Business. Amy Wilde mentioned that some of the libraries may need to adjust their budgets to accommodate the new wages. Dean Shuck had some questions on the new trustee orientation and whether not so new members can get more training on how the budget works. Director Houlahan will tentatively plan to have the next orientation before the 9/16 board meeting and divide this into segments such as systems, automation, history, Interlibrary loan and budgets. Anyone who wishes could attend any of these segments. ~~~~1 New Business - We have a Thank Yvu card from Kathy Matson for her retirement gift. Director Houlahan presented the Directors report. We have a new commissioner of Education Alice Seagren why is supporhive of libraries. There is also a State library meeting next week where directors will discuss the possible restructuring of regional libraries, Other -Question as to whether gifts can be designated for a partieular item. Consensus of th but PLS prefers this be more flexible to meet library needs. There will be no regular board meeting in August There will be a joint Executive BoardlFinance committee meeting instead at 7:Q0 pm bean Shuck motioned to adjourn. Second by Eric Welberg. Heating adjourned at S:d5 pm. Stacey Schuette Secretary C~ s~~~ ~ ~HUTCHINSON AIRPORT ADVISORY COMMISSION Jnly 20, zoo4 R.A ~ T 5:30 p,m. Airport Arrival/Departure Building MINUTES Members present Dave Skaar, Chuck Brill, Doug McGraw, Doug Kephart, Jeff Lux Others Present; John Olson, City of Hutchinson; Tom Parker, flutchinsvn Aviation; Tim Miller, Hangar Tenant; George Lohtka, Hangar'fenant Meeting called to order at 5:27 p,m. There was a quontm of members present I. A rove Minutes f March 23 2004 meetin Motion made by Kephart, second by Brill to approve March 23, 2004 minutes with corrections. Unanimous approval. ?. Pro used Im ravem nt Pr 'acts U date 1) Olson invited AAC members to the pre-construction conference with contractors regarding the NavAid Service Roadway, Apron expansion, and electrical work. Contractor for the project is Duininck $ros., loc. Subcontractors are Juul Contracting for excavation and (juade Electric fur electrical. The pre-construction conference will be held July 21, 2004 at lO:OD a.m. in the airport lobby. 2) As part of the project, excavation will be made to find and repair rile line from pond on the northeast comer of airport property, under the mnway/taxiway into ditch on west property line. Airport stafl'has traced the line starting from the west, east to a point under the taxiway just south of taxiway C. 3. Re oast for Private Han s: Commission members reviewed a request by Tim Miller, Hutchinson to erect a private hangar Commission members reviewed a reyuest by RAM Buildings, Winsted to erect a private hangar Commission members review planned development for commercial-grade hangars & for general aviation hangars and the related lease documents. A motion was made by Lux, second by Brill allowing Miller to build a private hangar on the first lot of general aviation hangar area and for RAM Buildings tv build a private hangar on the second lot of the general aviation hangar area. Unanimous approval. 4, Other gu i 1. F..lectricity Charges. The Civil Air Patrol (CAP) installed a pitched roof on their building this spring. CAP will receive a credit for electricity charges up to the full amount of their cost for the roof to be installed. CAP needs to provide us with a material listing and cost. Olson will be attending the July 27 City Council meeting. It would be good have the memo done in time for that meeting. 2. Commissioners Listing. Commissioners updated the Airport Commission list. N me 'T'erm Ex Tres Chuck Brill September 20D6 boug Kephart September 2005 Jeff Lux September 2007 David Skaar September 2008 Chairman Doug McGraw September 2004 (Filled remainder of Robert Hantge's term) Marlin Targetson Council Representative McGraw agreed to have his name submined for another term as AAC member. 3. Brill reported prp6lems with the electricity in the open hangar. C)Ison will review. C~~ ~ Airport Advisory Commission Minutes July 20, 2004 Page 2 At 6:36 p.m., a motion to adjourn was made by Brill, second by Lux. Unanimous approval. The next Airport Advisory Commission Meeting will be hcld upon receipt of plans submitted for construction of private hangars. S ~~.~~. Hutchinson Housing & Redevelopment Authority Regulax Board Meeting - September 21, 2004 Minutes CALL TO ORDER: Vice Chairman Thor Skeie called the meeting to order. Members Present: Casey Stotts, Brig Knott and Becky Felling. Staff Present: Jean Ward, and Judy Flemming. 2. MINUTES OF THE FIRA BOARD MEETING ON AUGUST 17, 2004 Casey Stotts moved to approve the Minutes as written. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. FINANCIAL REPORTS Casey Stotts moved to approve the Financials. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. 4. PARK TOWERS a. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the contract for Architectural Services with Engan & Associates. Casey Stotts moved to enter in a contract for Architectural Services with Engan & Associates. Brig Knott seconded and the motion carried unanimously. b. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the 2005 Operating Budget. Casey Stotts moved to approve Resolution #04-4 adopting the 2005 Operating Budget. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. c. Jean Ward revicwed with the Board the 2005 Streamlined Annual PHA Plan. One additional point that Jean plans to add to the plan is to review the need Far a tenant service coordinator on a yearly basis. At the present time most activities are coordinated on a volunteer basis. Casey Stotts moved to approve Resolution #104-5 approving the Submission of the 2005 Streamlined Annual PHA Plan. Becky Felling seconded and the motion carried unanimously. d. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the Capital Funds Program. e. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the results of her and Tan McDonald's investigation of the most profitable place for Park Towers' savings. Casey Stotts moved to enter in an agreement for safekeeping of pledged securities with First MN Bank. Brig Knvtt seconded and the motion carried unanimously. SCI3O0I, CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM UPT~ATE Judy Flemming reviewed with the Board the proposals from electricians received for the school construction program house. Becky Felling moved to enter into a contract with CR Electric to do the electrical work for the school construction program. Casey Stotts seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The closing for the lot purchase occurred September 2°a 5~0.~3 6. FRANICLTN-GROVE NEIGHBORHgOD PRO7EC1' UPDATE Becky Felling moved to approve the Franklin-Grove Neighborhood SCDP Loan #8680-16. Casey Stotts seconded and the motion carried unanimously. The Board brainstormed about some alternative uses for the City Rehab Revolving Loan Program. • Broader target area • Setup the program so it can be used on a case-by-case basis • Set up the program so that the loan will be paid back at some paint in time • Set a maximum loan amount (in current policy) • Pay .Funds directly to the contractor (in current policy) FYI a, MaxSeld should have a draft of the hqusing study ready by next week. b. Jean Ward gave the Board a report on the NAHRO Conference in St. Gloud c. Article from GMHF "The Importance of Stable Housing for Families with Children: Child Success, Workforce Development, Strong Communities" was included in the packet. 8. AD7OURNMENT Tltere being no other business, Vice Chairman Thor Skeie declared the meeting adjourned. Recorded by .lean Ward, HRA Executive Director Becky F 5Ca~3 13~~rlrlr~~ ~'"c~~r~rr°~s ,~y T",~~~rL 1 r~r tlr~- ~rrc~~rrli ~~Sp,rt ~~~hcr, ,~~~~1 rn ~i ~i~sc: ~+r~ii~~ r ,: ~,i~~'.~~rl o rs .- 19 I I ~ ~ - r.~ I ~,_._ L„-~~1 ..'ti ~.f A.., aGU /^y p WRJ. ~MA r /~ C r~ ~r f\ES~L~~N~Il1f,,. I1 ~ ~ 80.6L 7 ,,...... ........ ........--_ ......... . .. ~ .~ . . .. . .. '*~ ~@ ry ~y',ry vXIW0.0.A%~' ~~7~ .- ,..... ~. ...~._ m.~~...-. i~F ;fDENTfAL WI~ICJ+D'U'V REI~°'~AC~aa1l~hyp~" ---- - ..u .,, ._ ......- ~~. .-. -,_ __.~. ...~..- w......- -._.. . _-n - ......-.~.. mm... -~, m~ A~J~7 - _m -.__~. . „ .._..- f ~PJ~ w .~- _ ........ ........_. I ~ ~~. ~Cd ~~ ~~~ME.N f',~1.{~WT'V~t(}i~8~ ...--- ~ i 3 ~C1,.^~d ~7~4 ~ ....- fvNU EA[ T~IIF~Ga ~..- ~ GI~,~T~~~ fQ... _._ .. _ ..n, ~ ... Q4~ ~ _._ _., T ~hJL~ __ m, M~?V _ ~ ..... n.._.. C~~ - -., -..... _ -. .. ..-_ ( . - ~ ~.,.~ , ~C~.~~ l ..,...- ~6C~IW ~ ~ $~7. ~~ ~ (......_ ~ ...-..., , ~ ~~ ~ m~ .~....~ .,- _ _- ... ..~ , ~ ~ ~~7. ~r .~ ., _ - _ ..._ ,~. __ $p.Q~N Q70 ~ .. FVR ~'RNNk4LER I'~RMI~i ~ mm..... ~~ ... ~. a. ~......~._. ~~ a~i o~~ ~~r~ra~w s~s~r>~~w1 ..._ ... - . ~ ~ ~i~J1 .~ ~ ~ - _ - --- N ~ ~1,1f3~,-0~9~~~~~ 9f~~ - Ff~M1IlaLY1~~AF~E~ ~-.~ I C~LF - _ .....~ . ~ ~ ' $2Q~a,GOC~.C1l~ _ SII~Nt~IAL .. ~ - HER NC~~,R ~ -..W w ._ ., _ _ . .. ~~ ~ ~"~~1,4G.{~~? ~2~ _ ~... n..~... Shf?UC3URS ~C}"~HER 7kiAN tlJl'~~711`~N ... - . ~ i4~Y Q~~? p~~d~ ~#3~k ~ .~m.. n.. ~...~.., ,..... e . RE51taEN r"IAL HC1M ApI~V"T`~~7M+4~ y_.m °".- - -° . ...~.-. -- ~~ $~3,85~1.ti~0 ~~37 -- - ....~, NGNRE51t7EN 7IAL ~'~"+ifS'~N I~t~U~~EK'~..., _ ~ ~~. _ _ -. .~....- ~...... n...- ,- - ..._._... -. _m~~~. -_ _ RESIDf~NTlAL C'ARAr~ AL7~3~ 1 ~-~,~' ~.m.~~...- ....._ .._ ~ _, 1 ,Opp +~r TOT.A! ITEti15 .... _.._w ~~.. 1,'~35,~a0 U~ lCFI:.~?t.~ M.,J w~,,;rf."IiBL,eavr~a .vi C;,.~ pYlfJrr~td~7 = «J~f ~rrab~s° cat ~'t~rfirCti~~;r Fermi t.~ fnr. the a~a~aa~a~~a ~~ .'~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING -September 21, 2004 Hospital -Conference Room A/B Members present were: Chairperson, Steve Snapp; Vice Chairperson, Wayne Fortune (distance audio/ video conferencing) Sherry Ristau, Secretary; Bemie Knutson, Trustee; Dr. Cate McGinnis, Chief of Staff. Others present were: Philip Graves, President; Pam Larson, Finance, Information and Material Services Division Director; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support Services Division Director; Cary Linder, Foundation Director; Linda Krentz, Burns Manor Nursing Home Administrator; Jane Lien, Acute Care Division Director; $rian Weinreis, Executive Vice President Hospitals & Specialty Operations - Allina Hospitals and Clinics; Doug Hanneman, Hutchinson Leader; and Corrinne Schlueter, Recorder Chairperson Snapp called the meeting to order at 5:34 PM. Chairperson Snapp reviewed the following consent agenda items and asked if any items needed to be transferred to the regular agenda for further discussion. The agenda was as follows: 1. Fast Meetin Minutes Au st 17, 2004 2. Statistical Re ort s state attachment 3. Financial R rt Au st 2004 4. Accounts Pa able and Cash disbursements Au st 2004 S. Auxili Meetin Minutes Au t 2004 Consent Agenda • Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by Ristau, to approve the consent agenda. All were in favor. Motion carried. Regular Agenda r~ 1. New Business. A. Medical Executive Committee Meetin & Credentialin . Dr. McGinnis provided a report on the recent Medical Executive Committee Meeting. The following practitioners were recommended for membership to the Medical Staff: initial. Olukayode Awosika, MD Edwin Harrington, MD Michael Kearney, MD Sandy Lopez, RDA Katherine Hug, MD Norman Arslanlar, DO Kerry Kallas, MD Psychiatry Orthopedics Orthopedics Dental Assistant Radiology Radiology Radiology Active Courtesy Courtesy Allied Health Indep. Courtesy Courtesy Courtesy 5 ~~~ Governing Board Page two September 21, 2004 Reappointments. Robert Hauser, MD Richard Harrison, OFA-C Todd Christianson, OPA-C Gerald Berberick, OPA-C Steven Mulder, MD Terrance Longe, Mp Joy May, RN Cardiology Ortho, Phy. Asst, Ortho. Phy. Asst. Ortho, Phy. Asst, Emergency Room Cardiology RN Courtesy Allied Health Dep. Allied Health Dep. Allied Health pep. Active Active Allied Health Dep. Additioual Privileges. baniel Beggs, MD Brian Pollmann, DO Res3gn,atious. Bruce Homa, MD John Bohrod, MD Steven Miller, MD Radiologic Assisted Invasive Diagnostic Procedures Emergency Room Core Privileges • Following discussion McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Peterson, to grant membership and privilege to the above listed practitioners and to accept the resignations as recommended by the Medical Executive committee. All were in favor. Motion carried, 13. Construction Update. Andey Rasmussen, from McGough Construction, was present at the meeting to provide an update on the construction project. The major items were: Allied Mechanical, as of August 31, 2004, ceased to operate and was replaced, by action of the bonding company, with New Mech Mechanical a Twin Cities mechanical conh~acting Earn; The areas that were damaged by rainwater are soon to be corrected. The work in the front entry, Pharmacy, and Emergency services is proceeding according to the revised schedule. Rasmussen provided a report on the asbestos problem that has been identified in the lobby. The plan was to paint over the existing texmred surface however the contractors were not aware the material contained asbestos. Consequently an abatement process is recommended in order to solve current and potential future problems that could arise if the product remains in the hospital. Two processes were considered to finish the lobby once the asbestos is removed. There was considerable discussion regarding the use of a textured product and sound transmission problems that could arise by the main receiving desk in the lobby once the product was removed. The intent is to apply an acoustical product that will S~~~S .~ Governing Board Page three September 21, 20D4 address sound transmission. The less expensive of the two will cost approximately $x0,000. If sound transmission is a problem following these changes, additional work may need to be done by applying other acoustical products. The cast to abate the asbestos product from the lobby of the hospital is approximately $30,000. Following discussion, Fortune made a motion, seconded by Knutson, to hire an abatement contractor to remove the asbestos product from the lobby of the hospital at a cost of approximately $30,000 and to apply the replacement acoustical product as recommended 6y the project manager at a cost of approximately $40,000. All were in favor. Motion carried. C. Audit and Compliance Committee, Report. Mike Mueller was introduced by Snapp to provide the report (see attached minutes). • Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by Mueller to adopt the recommendation from the committee as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. D. Senior Care Report. Snapp reported HAHC had received a proposal to become a partner in an expanded senior living campus in the city's southwest comer. The proposal was presented by Ecumen and signed by the CEO of Ecumen and the President of Presbyterian Homes. Ecumen is the owner of the Oaks, an assisted- living facility. The proposal called for the city-owned Hutchinson Area Health Care to contribute $2.5 million to build a "town center" at the Oaks while Ecumen builds two additional senior livings buildings at the site. The proposal also called for Hutchinson Area Health Care to eventually coordinate fund- raising for a new skilled nursing facility, which would be build on the site and would replace Burns Manor Nursing Home. Ecumen would own 80 per cent of the equity in the project, and Hutchinson Area Health Care.would own 2D percent. Ecumen would manage the campus along Century Avenue Southwest. The Ecumen proposal was signi£cantly different than what was planned with Presbyterian Homes in a 50:50 partnership. The proposal states that Presbyterian Homes would function only as a developer. Snapp reported the Senior Care Task Force had convened to consider the proposal and is recommending HAHC not enter into an agreement at this time. The proposal that was received stated the urgency of an HAHC decision so that Ecumen can break ground on their project. The Board considered the ~L~-~S ~ Governing Board Page four September 21, 2004 recommendation of the task force and the proposal from Ecumen and said HAHC would delay discussions for a new senior campus for no more than six months. During this time period HAHC will examine and advance the plan, which received State approval, to remodel certain aspects of Bums Manor. In this plan Burns Manor would receive roof repair, window replacement, air conditioning, and converting some semi-private rooms to private. Also, additional common space would be provided. Following discussion, Fortun made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to table advancing the Senior Care partnership for six months. Additional discussion ensued. Fortun made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to amendment the first motion so that the Senior Care partnership would be tabled for no more than six months. All were in favor of the amendment. All voted in favor of the original motion. Motions carried. E. Vulnerable Adult Report. Linda Krentz, Bums Manor Nursing Home Administrator gave the Vulnerable Adult Report for the year of August 1, 2003 - July 31, 2004. She stated 21 total reports were called in as potential maltreahnent and none were substantiated. There were 12 reports on Burns Manor campus • 6 of the 12 were resident self-neglect or spousaUfamily issues. • 5 of 12 reports were related to elopement, resident falls, medical error, finger pinched in door. • 1 of 12 was a resident to resident abuse issue There were 9 reports on hospital campus • 1 of 9 alleged inappropriate handling of patient • 8 of 9 were of alleged self-neglect, verbal or physical abuse at home Hospital campus reports have increased this report period. Five in 2002 - 2003 verses 9 during this period of 2003 - 2004. • Following discussion, Peterson made a motion, seconded by McGinnis, to approve the Vulnerable Adult Report as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. II. Aeports• A. President. Graves reported we have six members and possibly two more for the HAHC - HMC Strategic Partnership Committee. And we will begin meeting on the privatization process soon. Graves asked the hoard for feedback from the /p~ Governing Board Page five September 21, 2004 Strategic Planning Retreat. The replies were positive comments and the location was excellent. B. Acute Care; Lien reported on the construction process within her division. She also reported there are only two open positions in Acute Care with the exception of two other positions that have been open for a long time. C. Care and Program Support. Nothing further to report. D. Community Care Programs. Nothing further to report. E. Finance Information & Material Services. Larson reported the Ortho Claims are being processed. Mary Johnson ,HIS Manager, has resigned and we will start recruiting for that position. F. Senior Care. Krentz reported that the Department of Human Services had made a visit to Burns Manor and reviewed 16 charts. There was one chart "out of compliance" with no significant findings. The reviewer was here for three days. G. Director of Medical Affairs. There was discussion regarding the story in the Minneapolis Tribune regarding the patient that went from our emergency room to Abbott to the Cath Lab in 76 minutes. H. Foundation Director. Linder reported the Share and Care Dinner will be on November 13, 2004. Birchwood is having a "special" Open House for Hutchinson Governing Board, Foundation Board, and Glencoe Hospital Board Members on Monday, September 27, 2004 from 7:30 - 9:00 PM. Also Bob Bunger will be here for a Foundation Planning Retreat on October 20'", from 9:OD AM - 3:00 PM, at the Event Center. The Hospital Governing Board members are invited to attend al] or part of that meeting. Patient Safety and,Perfotmance Improvement Committee. Schermann reported we have chartered three teams. We will also have a team looking at MRI Safety. We have completed two patient tracers to prepare for JCAHO. In the process a review was conducted using the medical record of a Mental Health patient and also one from Acute Care. The process follows them from the time they were admitted until dischazge. The process is very similar to an internal audit. SC~~ ~ Governing Board Page six September 21, 2004 Allina Report. Weinreis reported that Buffalo and four surrounding clinics went live on the Automated Medical Record. There were about 1800 concerns that surfaced within the first 4$ hours; Allina is also busy working on a 2005 budget. Snapp requested if additional business needed to be discussed at the meeting. Hearing none, McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Mueller, to adjourn. All were in favor. Motion carried. 77te meeting was adjourned at 7:05 PM. Respectfully submitted, ~~ >c.t- Corrinne Schlueter Recorder Sherry Ristau Secretary S~~~S ~ ~ri r~ u -5~ _ _6300 TOTAL CONSl1LTING -- - - 656.52 _ - 18 500 00 135AD 80,468.76 3 427 96 24,531.22 lfi.fi4%~ 15 07 r - - -~ - - --- -- _ _ , . _ , . , 2.04 i 18.53% fi306 TOTAL OTHER SERViCES__& CHARGES _ 636,900.00 (1) t45,271.5T fi03,17423 _ 32,825.77 _ _ 94 84 _ --- - -- "~--- - - -- __6800 TOTAL COST OF SALES _ _ _ ' __ - _ 0.00. 2,827.50 5,31375 -5 313 751 . _ _ _ A~IVIO_ ~~~--- - ~ - - 6900 TOTAL M15CELL_A__NEO_l15 _ _r_ ~ D.00~ _ 713.901 _ 712.06 , . ~ -712 00 - - -- ~ ' - fi965 DEPRECATION __ _. __- -~ 178,540.00 - -- ~ 18,579.581 1fi3,61fi.2fi . 14,923.74 91 64°.5 --- --- - - _ _ ,_ - - - - TOTA~ EICPENDITURE i N N -~--- 1,043,023A0 ~ 169,fi49.72~ 877,989.28 165,033.72 . 0.841 - - --T-- --i- - ~ ---- ET I COME~LOSSy ~ ~ 1 $2,58fi.79 -1 t1,928.02 -- - ---- f ----- j - -__i1] IncEudes software consultant & Jul~& A W - -- - aste0.9ana ment ymeM 1 T -- - -- - - --- -- ~ - - Non income statement budget__ _ _ -- - ----- ----- - ----- - - - -- 7000 TOTAL CAPrrAL OUTLAYS 730,000.90 0.00 24 185.00 ~ 5,815.00 80.fi2% Ci of Hutchinson i - -- -- - - - ___ _ _Income reports - Wat_er_ Sewer Com ost Recycling__Refuse ~ -. _ _ --- -- -.- _ ~ ~9l3OIO4~-- ~ -r - - ~- - --Prior Priori - - - -- 1 -- -_..- _ -_ __-_ _ ___._ __ _Annual _ Current --- _Year_Te Bud _Percent-- ----- -- ~- -- - __~ _ Year Year Tai Percen! _ _ _ Budget hlont_h_ _ _ Date, Rem_ ainin_B - _ Used --_- ~_ i _ _ Bud~etf-- Datei----Used _484 REFUSE -RECYCLE - - ---- _ 4001 REVENUES "-- - - j ----- --~- - -- - 1 -- -- `- -- - _ i _4190 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 160,000.00 I 12,303.OD~ 115,146.34 275,146.34! -~- ~- - ~ -- - -- -- _445_9 TOTAL SALES-_ _-_ - _ -_ --~ _ _ 743,700.00, ~ 74,759.93 fi50,914.92 ],394,614.92 - - --j--- -- ~~- - - - - -~"~ ---- _ 4001 REVENUES ___ - _i_ 903,700A0' 87,062.93 7fi6,D61.2fi 1,669,761.26 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 6001 EXPEND3TURE5_-- -- - T-- - ---- -- - - ---~- - ~ -.._.-~- - 6i05- TOTAL SALARIES 8 FRINGE BENEFFf_ 1_04,983.00 _ 2,464.55 __ 21,276.3D~ 83,706,70 20.27°,hl ~ ~~ - --- -- 6200 TOTAL SUPPLIES REPAIRS 8 MA{}~ -~-]D5 000 00 ------ - - -- ~ --- - - -- -- - v~ _ C' of Hutchinson _ i __ _ Income reports -Water Sewer Com t Recycling Refuse I _~ '. --- - - --- -- -- -- ~--- - -T---- - - i - -~-- - --- -- -- 09/30/04 _ pd~ I per, _ __ __- Annuaf Current Year To Budget Percent r _ Yean _ Year Toj P_ e_rcent -- __ - _Budget ~Monlh ZRemaining- Iised~ --I- ---Budget) - ---bate[ Ilse aoas coMPOST _ _ ~ -- _ ~ ~ 4001 REVENUES -- - ------ - --- ----- - - -- ~- I - - --- _ 4100 TOTAL INTER_GDVERNMENTAL REVENUE_ 32,000.00 0.00 a.00 32,000.0_0 6.0046_ _ ~___-__ - - _-_ - -_- - - 4250 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 0.00 __ 39,272.97 386,726A0 386,726.00 _ 0.00%~ ~- _ 4450 TOTAL SALES -- - - _ _ 1,451,423.00 _34,894.04 1,106,457.40 _2,557,880.40 _7.6_23_%--- ~--~- - _ _ 4700 70TAL REIM6UR5_E_M_ENTS __ ~ _ 100,DDO.OQ 3Q.06 1,526.60 101,526.8[1 1.53°ki _4001 REVENUES - _ _ .1,551,423.06 74,197.09 1,494,710.26 2,659,407.20 96.34°ki Q.D01 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- - -- - -~ - - L- -- - r '-- -- -. _.- - - ---~ - -- - -- -- 6001 EAPENDITURES ~ _ _ ~ I - ~- 6105 TOTAL SALARIES & FRINGE BENEFIT ~ 488,126.00_ I 47,095.33 356,808.97 _ 121_314.03 __ 75.15%r0.00~ ____ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ 6206 TOTAL SUPPLIES, REPAIRS 8 MAIN 158,1D0.00. ; 65,499.58 390,277.30 -232,177.30 245.85% I { 6300 TOTAL CONSULTING - ---r- -- 273,390.00: j _ 17,942.26 264_92_5.92 _ 6,374_08 96.94% -_ - ~___- -~~ - - -- - - - r---- - _ 6306 _TOTAL O_TH_ER SERVICES & CHARGESL- 429,D63.00 I 44,743.10 279,313.42 149,769.58 65.10% ~ .I _ _ ~ - _ - - - - -' ---_-- 6800 TOTAL COST OF SALES 8 INVENTORY ADJ4 365,000.00 ~ 60,25268 541,318.55 -178,918.65 _ - f i _ fi900 TOTAL M15CELLANEOUS__ _ ; 16,400.00 j 113.00 3,033.02 13.36fi.98 , __6905 DEPRECATION __f _ ~ 106,522.00! 12,860.55 115,744.98 -9,122.98 106.56%' L --__- - - -' - - TOTAL E7(PENDITURE _ ~ 1,836,633.00 266,506.50 1,962,Q22.26 •125,389.26 t.07 NET INCOME {LOSSj_ --- _-_ ~ -194,309.41 X67,312.06 2,764,796.46 ~ - - -- _ i --- - --- - ~- - - - -- - - - -- a Non_income statement budge[ - -- - --- - _ -- - i - - -- i - - - - -~- - - - -~-- -- -- - -_ _-~-_ -- _ 7006 TOTAL CAPETAL OUTLAYS _ _ t1fi,000.00' 3,727.50 148,835.44 __ -32,835.44 247.00% /REPI - - ~- -- -___ - _ - - 1,952,633.00: _ ~ 272,234.00 2,110,857.76 •156,224.70 _ - _-- ~--~ - -- -- -+1 -- - -- ~- --- --- - -- -~ -__-I- - _____ _ Ci of Hutchinson -_ __ __lncome reports -Water Sewer Compost Re_cycfing Refuse ' --- - - rT- _ _ _ _ -- ---- __- _-_ O913O1Q4 ~_ _ -- Prior : prior~-_- -- -- -_ - _ - __ Mnuat Current ~ Year To _ Bud _ Percent Year Year Ta Percent _.- __-- ~ --BUdget~_Month hate Remaining used ~Bu~t - - Gate Used 406 WATER 4001 REVENUES - ---- `-~-- ~ -- --~- I - ~ - I 4250 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SE_RV_fCES ~ ' _ 0.00 ~1,fi50.00 14,850.OD 14 &50.001 ~ 17,000.00 11,306-49 102.79 4450 TOTAL SALES - --r 1,255,000.OD 121 I 5.834.87' 1.0326477 aea aT a~ ~a~e i i , ~..~ ....,. ~;,.... ..,,, ~. ~- __ __ 1 V~ U '~ 8C ?5 64.96%' [ I 320,524.00 221 19 69.5445 __ ~ 92,250.00 48 34 1234% 219,500.00 197. ?1 68-8B% ~ 203,800.00; 135. ?9 _ 58.99% ~_ 16,705.00' 9, H] ~ 0-00% 55,000-00: -- i7' 17.30% i 27,950.00 1, i2 61.35°k ~ ~ 220,000.00 142 9 0.45 _ 1,155,726.00 756, -- 226, ~ I ~ --- - --- V CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPOR7~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 2004 to 'REVENUE REPDRT -GENERAL 2003; Se tember. ~~~ 2004 S p 2004 2004 2004 Se tember P p e tember YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE P ERGENTAGE YTD MON7H pATEAC7UAL BUDGET ~~ REMAINING USED !TAXES ~ ~ ... ' ~ 'LICENSES 7,379,021.48 1,580,048.95 3,371,280 1,781,233.05 A8.87% PERMITS AND FEES 33,802.46 1,073,25. ___ 26,765.25 43,700 16,914.75 81.29% iIN7ERGOVERNMEN7ALREVENUE 265,300.98 1 127 804 36 41,504.32 59 75 331,048.88 220,000 (111,048.88) 150.48% CHARGES FOR SERVICES , , . 849 652 21 , 6.68 114 875 86 1,429,258.38 811 19 2,345,373 916,114.84 80.94%a ~ FINES 8. FORFEITS , . , . , 6.20 1,381,698 580,701.80 58.28% i SALES A3,845.85 5,28D01 34,542.69 88,000 33,457.31 50.80% INTEREST -354.30, -454.38 0.00 454,38 0.00°/a REIMBURSEMENTS 8,245.48 247 104 59 744.49 20 338 -5,497.66 32,000 37,497.86 -17,18°h TRANSFERS , . - . ,87 ' 101,978.95 247,338 145,358.05 41.23% 'SURCHARGES -BLDG PERMITS 455,805.14 2 793 86 1,236,25 1 091 35 482,720.28'~~ ___1,479,500 ~ ___995,778 .72 ~ 32.65°k ~ TOTAL , . , . 4,550.38 0 _ (4,55D 38) 0.00% , ~ 4,210,822.11 204,725.34 4,796,174,90 9,198,089.D0 4,401,974.10 52.14°h 2004 CITY OF HUTC HINSON FINANGIAL REPORT 2004 Septembew :EXPENSE REPORT-GENERAL 2003 2004 ~ 2004 2004 2004 September September Septembar, YEAR TO ApOPTED BALANGEPENCENTAGE i YTD MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED i OD1 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR 31,020.48 5,fi30.31 ~ 31,197.23 57,749,00 26,551.77 54.02%a 003 ELECTIONS 150,665.35 25,409.98 186,000.65 252,341.00 86,340.35 85.78°k 004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 381.99 251,11721 ~ 276.08,_ 40 627.84 1,324.27 260 227 25 15,134.00 g48 758A0~ 13,809.73 ~ 188 5 8.75% . 005 MOTOR VEHICLE 118,604.31 ~ , 76,425.03 , . 127,076.22 , 194,474,00 , 30.75 67 397 78 57.99% 65 34% 008 ASSESSING 1 , . . 007 LEGAL ~ 81,916,20 12,888.00 ~ 108,323.04 41,000.00 190,319,00 41,000.00 81 985 98 O.DD°k 56 92% 008 PLANNING 009 INFORMATION SERVICES ~ 98,647.50 13,800.76 107,953.77 761,509.00 , . 53,555.23. . 66.84% 170 POLICE DEPARTMENT 82,227.50 11,794.40 76,884.31' 180,iD8.00 83,413,88 47.90°~ 115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 1,557,00829 ~ 204,905.44 1,553,701.64 2,489,349.00 915,647.38 82.92% ~ 120 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,782.30~ 167 341 78 11.83 16 1 4,998.09 12,000.00 7,001.91 47.85% 130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS . . 177,880.48 ,72 .88, 18 189 23 174,733.16 128 273 48 388,406.00 792 650 OD 793,872.84 47.43% 750 ENGINEERING 312,895.52 , . 47,253.37 , . 288,044.33 , . 468,191.00 88,436.52 200 146 87 65.51°k 58 00°h 152 STREETS&ALLEYS ' 180 GITY HALL BUILDING 584,581.43 77,216.87 518,284.20 778,425.00 , . 282,740.80 ~ . 88.32% 201 PARK/RECREATION ADMINISTR 105,744.11 116 039 89 16,824.83 17 441 0 79,594.60 134,787,00 55,192.40 59.05% 202 RECREATION , . , . 5 116,782,73 183,080.00 88,297.27 63,78% 203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 174,508.17 ' 22,286.41 148,843.02 197,758.00 48,914.98 75.27% 204 CIVIC ARENA 80,368.50 5,888.49 43,237.38 51,378.00 8,140.64 ~~ 84.18°k 205 PARK pEPARTMENT 159,780.56 14,808.02 173,940.77 281,293.00 , iD7,352.23 81.84°k 208 RECREATION BUILDING & ROOI 517,483.02 53 888 20 77,079.74 8 048 08 571,993.48 85 428 59 798,113.00 226,118.51 71.87% 207 EVENTS CENTER ~ , . 712,200.30 , . 12 193.01 , . 115 089 79 122,327.00 183 386 00 36,888.41 48 1 89.84°/, 208 EVERGREEN BUILDING 5,713.10 , 1,109.95 , . 7,328.69 . . 13 250 00 ,298,2 5 923 31 70.44% 55 0° 25D LIBRARY 3D1 GEME7ERY 100,973.80 3,181.10 1D4,452.81 , . 148,348.00 , . 43,895.09 ~ .3 70.41°h 310 pEBTSERVICE 78,408.36 15,177.04 78,496.89 121,248.00 44,751.31 63.09% 320 AIRPDRT 9,553.75 7,603.75' 219,747.00 212,137.25 3.48°k 350 UNALLOCATED GENERAL EXPE 85,870.13 386 564 85 3,718.21 71 887 91 54,168.98 120,914.00 68,747.02 44.80°h TOTAL , . , . 379,820.52 812,05D00 432,229.48 48.77°h 5,4fi0,988.98 759,553.55 5, 507,549.53 8, 198,08fi.00 3, 690,536.47 59,88°k ~C~-~c~ _.. 20p4, ( - ~ ~~ CITY OF HUTCHIfJSON FINANGIAL REPORT September 2003 2004 2004 2003 REVENUE REPgRT -GENERAL ~ ACTUAL' September YEAR TO, ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE Year to Date MONTH PATE ACTUAL. BUDGET REMAINING ~ USED 'TAXES LICENSES 1,378,021.48 0.00 1,580,046.95 3,371,280.00 1,791,233.05 46.87% ~ 'PERMITS AND FEES 33,802,48 265 300 96 1,073.25 41 5 26,785.25 43,700.00 16.914.75 61.29% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE , . 1 127 904 38 , 04.32 59 758 6 331,048.68 220,000.00 (111,048.88) 150.48% CHARGES FOR SERVICES , , , ~ , . 8 1,429,258.38 2,3g5,373.D0 918,114.64 80.94% FINES 8 FORKEITS 649,852.21 114,975.86 811,196.20 1,381,898.00 580,701.80 58.28°/, ,SALES 43,845.85 5,280.01 34,542.68 68,000.00 ~ ~ 33,457.31 50.80% INTEREST (354.30). 0.00 ~ (454.38) D.Op 454,38 O.DOry° REIMBURSEMENTS ~ 8,245.48 247 104 59 1g4.49 20 338 (5,497.Bfi), ' 32,000.00 37,497.86 -17.18% TRANSFERS ~ , . - , .87 101,879.85 247,338.00 145,358.05 41.23°~ SURCHARGES -BLDG PERMITS 455,805.74 ~ 1,236.25 482,720.28 1,478,500.00 995,779.72 32.65% TOTAL 2,793.88 1,091.35 ' 4,554.38 0.00 (4,550.38) ~ 0.00% 4,270,822.17 204.725.34 4,796,174.90 9,188,D89.00 4,401,914.10 52.74°k 20(14 September ;EXPENSE REPORT -GENERAL 2003 September 2004 September 2DD4 YEAR TO 2004 A 2004 September SUMMARIZED DOPTED BALANCE PE RCENTAGE YTD, MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET, REMAINING USED ;General Govt. Public Safet 898,304.66, 143,375.34 ~ 958_,391.34 ~ 1,858,179.00 ~~ 697,787.88 ~' - -~ 57.87% y ~ Streets & Alle s _ 1.843,982.85 . , 238,828.76 ~ 1,859,646.37 ~ 3,042,405.00 ' 1,182,758.63 61.12°k :Parks&Recreation 977,258.95 124,472.04 8D4,328.53 1,268,B18.OD ' 482,287.47 63.50% ;Miscellaneous 1,388,877.75 177,091.89 7,443,592.04 ~ 2,080,181.00 ~ 636,588.88 89.40°,y 452,534.78 74,788.12 441,591.25 1,152,705.00 711,113.75 38 31% TOTAL 5,460,966.89 759,553.55 5,507,549.53 ~ 9,198,088.00 3,690,538.47 . 59.88% 5(~~~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT 21-Oct-04 September 30, 2004 Interest fate Of Dat® tx Institution _ pescriplion Rete Purchase Maturity Amount US BANK Money Market 1.43°k 10/318002 11/5/2002 386,448.76 Smith Barney FHLMC mad 4.00% 7/308004 787/2012 288,500.00 step up Smith Barney FHLB C 4.05°k 1!78004 7/308008 300,000.00 Smith Barney FHLB C 4.375°k 91198001 4/11/2005 750,000.00 Smith Harney FHLB C 4.180% 8/258001 4/19/2005 270,000.00 Prudential pool 338914 7.226% 72 31 96 02 D1 2028 7.325.78 Expected life fi.2 years Smith Barney FHLM -C 4.650% 11/218001 581/2007 300,375.00 Prudentail pool 338389 7270% 12 31 96 02 Ot 2028 4,815.81 Expected life 4.7 yea rs Smith Barney Countrywide 9!20!2004 9/30/2004 3,443,421.04 C°mm~r Jtl pxpar Prudential FHLB 5.00°k 582/2003 5/2212013 300,000.00 Prudential FHLB 4,00% 611212003 6/1272013 300,000.00 Prudential FHLB 1.190% 6/2672003 08128113 400,000.00 Wachovia FHLB 3.000% 7/76/2003 7!188013 200,000.00 step up Wachovia FHLB 3.000% 1289/2003 12/29/2008 125,000.00 step up Wachovia FHMA 3.250% 511112004 5171/2009 300,000.00 step up Wachovia FHMA 2.250°h 7(19!2004 711912007 200,000.00 step up Wachovia FHMA 3.000°k 8/248004 2/258008 100,000.00 step up Home State Bank 3.000°k 8!138004 8/138005 200,000.00 Wells Fargo 1.570°~ 08/02/04 11!12/04 400,000.00 First Minnesota 2.380% 08/17/04 06/18/05 750.000.00 Wells Fargo 2.270% 07/76!04 07/27/05 750,000.00 First Minnesota 1.610% 04!15104 09/16/04 750,000.00 First Minnesota 1.580°h 11!14!04 11/15/04 750,000.00 $11 285,884 19 5 ~ ~~'7 tOrt5r2004 51.21 AM Frna7 HUTCHEN9ON AREA HEALTH CARE Statement al Revenues and Expenses Month and Period Ended September 30, 2004 CURRENT MONTH YEAR-70.DATE YEAR-TO-0ATE Over 1Under] Budget Over (Under} Bud ge[ VARUWGE % Revenue Actual Budget Dollars Percent Rc7ual eudvet Dollars Percent September 2003 CY vs PY 4 In patient revenue 53,365,711 53,169,223 $256,688 8.2% 527,413,804 528,812,229 151,398,425) -49% 519,814,721 38.4°k 2 Out patient revenue 4,419,315 4,104,811 ,314,504 7.7% 37,883,687 37,452,274 431,413 ],2% 30,123.594 25.8% 3 Resitlen[Revenue 578,230 586941 [8711] -LS% 5,606,906 5,425,923 182,963 3.4% 4,515948 24.2% 4 Total pabentlresideni revenue SB,363,256 57,800,975 5562,281 7.2% 570,906,397 571,690,426 fE784,029] ~1.1% 554,454,263 302°6 Dismun[s 5 Govemmental8 Policy Discgun[ 4,114,752 3,793,405 320,741 8.5% 34,734,709 34,818,232 (83,523] -0.2% 23,969,703 4a 9% 6 Free Care 0 4,187 141671 -700.0% 6,096 37,500 [29.404} -76.4% 5,476 d8 0% 7 7o1a1 deduction from revenue E4,114,152 53,797,572 5316580 8.3% 534,742,805 $34,855,732 (5112,927} -TB.T% 523,975,173 44.9% 8 Net palienUresWent revenue 54,249,164 54,003,403 5245,701 6.1% 536,563,592 536,834,694 [5671,102} ~1.8% 530,479,990 18.7% 9 Olirer operating revenues 75,670 84501 18,837] -10.5% 630,738 695,573 164,&351 -9.3% 203439 210-0% 10 Net operating revenue 54,324,174 54,087,904 5236870 5.8% 536,794,330 537,530,287 [5735,9371 -2.0% 530.682,529 i9-9% Excenses 11 Salaries 51,880,462 51,824,037 556,631 3.1% 516,730,073 516,347,742 5382,331 2.3% 513,923,678 2172% 12 Employee 8ene81s 504,510 417,563 88,947 20.8% 3,725,726 3,719,303 6,423 0.2% 3,377,140 703% 73 Profsslonal and Aled'eral Fees 520,662 513,177 7,50.5 15% 4,328,225 6,623,659 (295,434 -6.4% 3,392.685 27 6% t4 UIiFBes, MNCe ConlracLS 8 Repaws 147,990 162,630 [34,640} -19.0% 1,560,7-08 1,556,335 4,413 0.3% 1,296.524 20.4% 75 Fog4 Drugs&Suppfies 634,499 495,838 138,661 28.0% 5,785,900 4,7%,334 459,566 9.7% 3,635,337 42.7% 16 Other expense 170,588 11Q178 24,408 1fi.T% 1,231,475 1,295,089 {63,614) ~.9% 972,397 26-6% f7 Mmnesda Care 62,100 53,949 8,157 15-1% 458,711 485,488 {26,777] ~.5% 315,032 45-fi% 18 Sad deb[ 130,215 1[12,489 27,728 27-1% 681,775 758,421 {76,646] -10.1% 785,354 ~l32% 19 Interest 51,845 68,862 [17,217} -25.0% 415,426 560,611 (145,185] -25.9% 355,220 16.9% 20 Oeprecialion 174,845 183,809 {8,964} ~-9% 7,509,473 1,589,964 180,491) 5.1% 1,392,661 8.4% 21 Tgal expenses $4,277,334 53,968,320 5289,016 7.2% 535,827,532 535,882,9-08 5166,584 0.5% 524,M6,22B 21.7% Ewoess of net operating revenue 22 over funder]operatatg expenses 547,440 599.584 (552,1481 52.4% 5966,798 51,861,319 (59005211 -48.2% 51,236.301 -218% Nonoperatirg Revenues 23 Imrestinen[incmre 520,929 Etd,00B 56,920 d9-4% 5158,517 5126,000 532,547 25.8% 5200,314 20.9% 28 Other nonoperaling revenue feet) 160,628 25,384 114,844 451-6% 416,957 227,468 589,489 83.3% 7,964 5135.5% 25 Plaza 15 Income 1 {Loss} 11,348 53,527 {2,179} -1fi-1% 62,905 85,539 {22634) -26.5% 145,791 -56 9% 26 Talal nonoperatirg revenue 5112,296 552,911 5179,385 225.6% 5638,409 5439,007 5t99,402 45.6% 5354,069 80.3% 27 Nel Income $219,736 5152,495 567,241 44-155 51,665,207 $2,306,326 {5701,119) .30.6% 51,590,370 0-9% 26 Patient days 910 986 [78] -7.7% 7,750 9,025 (1,275) -14.1% 7,266 6.7% 29 Resident days 3,336 3,486 (150) d-37, 33,232 32,215 f9B3) -3.1% 30,836 1-3% 3D Pemen[occupancy-budget beds-Hospital 50.645 54.8% ~.2% -7-7% 47.F% 54.9% -7.B% -14.19'0 64.4% fi.3% 31 Percent occupant'-0udge[be~-Nursing Hpme 90.4% 94.5% ~,1% -4-3% 92.7% 95.6% -2.9% 3.1% 91.8% 0.9% 32 FTE's 4BO.l 479.3 0,6 0.2% 474.0 479.3 3.3 -1.1% g35.3 B.9% 33 Atlmissi0ns(adjusted)-HospilaE wlly 586 613 {27] 3.5% 5,026 5,623 (596) -10.6% 5,096 -1.4% 31 Expenses (neq per admisslgn{adjusted]-HOSpAal only 6,168 5,423 725 13A% 5,927 5,288 639 12.1% 4,779 24.0% 35 Revenue peradmission fadjusled]- Haspiial Doty 13,F99 11,689 1,5]0 12-9% 12,925 11,712 1,213 10.495 9,737 32.7% 36 Nel Revenue peradmiuign {adjusted]-Hospital only 6,343 5,663 680 12.0% 6,220 5,677 544 9.6% 5,080 22.4°.6 37 Discounts as a perr~t olreverw~es 49.2% 48.7% 0.5% 1-1% 69.0% 48-fi% 0.4% 0.8% 44.0% 11.3% 38 FTE's per 100 admissions {adustetl) -Hospital only 4.9 4-7 02 4-4% 5 7 4 7 OS 70 2% d 6 117% { $1 39 Days in Net Accounts Receivable . 66.1 . 55.0 11.1 . ?0.2% . 63.4 a-3% FINSTMN7-xis Pam Larson or?snDDa -17ztAu Final HUTCHINSCIN AREA HEALTHCARE Campara0re 73alarwe Sheet As of September 30, 2004 ASSETS Cunen[ Assets 1 Cash and inves4nents-Operations 2 Cash and imeslments-5sH-Insured 3 SubWtal cash 8 inrestmerrts (A} {el fA1 {61 SEP At1G SEP Change 2004 2004 2003 CY vs PY f9, 122,942 59.687,261 59,316,708 (493,766) 1,536,085 1,591,065 1,238,162 297,923 $10,659,027 511,478,328 510,554,870 104,157 21,406,991 19,530,496 18,069,875 3,337,286 (4,845,260} (4,717,182) [4,828,923] [16,337) _7,622,548} (6,767,6$6] [4969,418] [2.6531301 58,939,133 56,045,658 58,271,334 667,799 537,049 399,883 305,145 231,904 784,142 765,572 701,023 83,119 330,514 239,299 259,796 70,718 LIR6R171E5 ANO FUND SALANCES Current Liaheli[ies Current maWritles of Long term deft Aooounts paya6la -trade Es6maled wnhactual set8errients-net Accrued eYpane03 - Saiaries P70 Interest Setl-Insured programs Other Deferred Ilahi96es Deferred revemre 4 PatienBResident receivables 5 Allowances [or bad debts 6 Advances and cont2ciuaf allowances 7 Nei patienthasiden[ and third-party fi pa}0f f9C01YahiC6 9 10 Cher receivables ~ net 11 lrrventades 12 Prepaid esperccs 13 Teta[Cunent Assets 521,249,865 520,928,738 (20,092,168 1,F57697 74 Board Dasionated!Funded Deorecia8on tnvestmenls $6,104,930 56,365772 (13,951,876 R.B46748] 15 lnveslment in Jaint Ventures ~ 5939,610 5906,165 5418,118 521,492 Plant Assess 16 Land 17 Buildings 18 Acwmulaled depreua0on 19 1)uildings kss deprecial"an 20 Equipment 27 AmrmWated deprefia8on 22 Equipment less dep,reciatbn 23 Cashtionslruc5on Sequipment 24 Cons[ructien in progress 25 To1a1 Plant Assets Glher Assets 26 Deferred financing costs 27 Total Funds Vn t'~ FINSTiA l47.xls Pam Larson 51,019,766 $1,019,786 51,019,788 0 Tula! Curren) LiethliBes 31,023,076 31,012,325 27,198,445 3,824,837 _13,353,850) 113,238,879} [722523031 [1 101 547} LAngderm Gehl [less Cunen[ 511.889,226 517,773,446 516,946, 142 2,723p84 maludties} 17,941,387 17,703,471 15,779,412 2,181,975 (12,866,715) 152,773,630] {11,862,755) (1,003,960} $5,076,672 $4,929,841 53,916,657 1,158,015 D 0 0 0 _ 5,994,175 5,841,257 3,175788 2819007 529.758,461 529,584.332 523,058,355 8,700 106 Fund balance $91,462 592,573 (104,903 {13471] 558,144,328 557,858,180 557,625,252 519,076 Total Funds fA1 fB1 {A) {B] SEP AUG SEP Charge 2004 2004 2003 CY vs PY 51,208,689 51,274,446 51,702,986 105.665 1,811,252 2,005,353 2,768,009 1356.757} 1,400,211 1,649,844 2,316,821 (976,610} 908,125 750,358 683,533 226,592 1,475,976 1,480,247 1,339,799 136,177 270,633 179,515 261,977 [11,144) 411,502 356,649 562,561 (145,059} 175,636 166,929 464,438 11,400 24,505 24,505 151,611 (127,106) 2,977 2,739 0 2,917 57,695,826 57,634,565 58.831,733 {1,135,905} 521,084,054 S2F 078890 $22,272,543 [1,488,4891 529,364,446 529,144,705 $26,520,978 2,843,470 558,144.328 557,858,180 557,625,252 519,076 C~ RESOLUTION 12541 CERTIFICATION OF ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO THE COUNTY OF MEGLEOO lBE IT RESOLVED SY THE CITY COUNCI4 OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA That the lollpwing embreces unpaid asaesamente levied by the City Cpuncil of Hutchinson, Minnesota, under Statutes Sea 429.011 to 428.111 for the various assessments of the Cily of Hutchinson, to be levied and a66@96ed upon the properties as listed for the following purposes tar the current year, and that a copy thereof be sent tp the Cpunty Auditor of said McLeod Cpunty, Minnesota: WATERMAIN ANO SANITARY $EWER 10th Installment pf 10 yr asaesament 10th installment of 10 yr assessment 10th installment of 10 yr a69e9ament 10th installment of 10 yr assessment 10th Installment of 10 yr assessment 10th installment p! 1D yr assessment 10th installment of 10 yr assessment Bth Installment of 9 yr asseaamenf 9th installment oT 9 yr assessment 9th installment of 10 yr assessment 9th installment of 10 yr assessment 9th installment of 10 yr asseaamenf 9th installment of tp yr assessment 9th installment of 10 yr assessment 8th Installment of 10 yr assessment 8th installment of 10 yr assessment Bth Installment pf 10 yr a;easement 6th installment of 10 yr asseaement 7th inataPmant of B yr assessment 7th Installment of 1 D yr assessment 8th Installment of 10 yr asseaamenf 5th installment of 10 yr assessment 8th installment of 10 yr assessment 8th installment o} 10 yr asaesament 61h installment of 10 yr asaesament 8th Installment of 10 yr assessment 6th installment of 10 yr asaesament 8th Installment of 10 yr assessment 8th installment of 10 yr assessment 5th installment of 10yr asaesament 5th installment of 1 D yr asaesament 5th installment of 10 yr assessment Slh installment of 10 yr aeseasment 5th installment of 10 yr assessment Stn installment pf 10 yr assessment 5th Installment pf 10 yr assessment 5th installment oT iD yr asaesament 5th installment vT 10 yr assessment Stn Installment o} 10yr asaesament 4th installment of lpyr assessment 4th installment of 10yr a99essment 3rd installment of 10yr assessment d:lassessme52004 cerllflcatlan9:45 AM Roll #300 85-05 Stvrmsewer, San & Water Roll #301 95.09 Stormsewer, San & Water Roll #302 95.04 Stormsewer, San 8 Water Roll #303 95.12 Stormsawer, San & Water Roll #305 95-D1 Stormsewer, San & Water Roll #306 95-17 Storm6ewer, San & Water Roll #307 95-23 Stormsewer, San & Water Roll #307A 95-24 San Sower, Watermain, 5m, 5l Roll #309A 95-24 San Sewer, Water Cpnnectlpn Roll #5000 95.07 Sm, San Sewer, Watelmaln, St Roll #5002 85.17118 San Sewer, Wa[ermaln Roll #5004 B7-O5I8 Watermain, San Sewer. St (r) Roll #221 B Watermaln Appur Roll #230G San, Storm Roll #5015 97-25 San Sewer Roll #5098 97-28 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Roll #5019 95-04 San Sewer Roll #5020 97 San Sewer Roll #5018A 87-28 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Roll #5022 98-13 Sanitary Sewer Roll #5025 89-08 Water Main Roll #5029 991314 San Sewer, Water Main Roll #5031 99.10 Sanitary Sewer, Water Maln Roll #5032 9&35 Water Main Sanitary Sewer Roll #087A 78 Prof Water Maln, def ease edivated Roll #2936 94 prvj, Water Main, Sanitary Sevrer Roll #2B5A 94 prvj, Water Maln, Sanitary Sewer Roll #50158 87 prvj, Water Main Roll #5020A 97 proj, Water Main Roll #5075C B7 proj. Sanitary Sewer Roll #5039 2000-12-13-17 Sanitary Sewer, Water main Roll #5040 20011-17 Sanitary Sewer Roll #5044 2000-13 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main Roll # 221C Water main 94 Project R011 #290A 94-D2 Storm Sewer, San, Water Roll #291 C 94-tl5 Storm Sewer. San, Water Roll #291 D 94.05 Stprm Sewer, San, Water Roll #294C 94.03 Storm Sewer, San, Water Roll 2300 San, Storm Roll #2496 B&01 Water Main Roll #5050 2001 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main Roll#5054 11.12102 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main SC!~~ 1 3rd 2nd Installment of 10yr aseeasment RoIpf5058 00102 SanR9ry Sewer Water Main tat installment of 10yr assessment Roll #50150 , 97/02 Sanitary Sower 1st installment q(10yr assessment Roll#5070 D4-03 Sanitary Sewer installment pf 10yr assessment RDIHF5071 04-13 Sanitary Sewer MILL AND OVERLAY 3rd installment p(10yr assessment Rvll#5055 02-08 Mill and Overlay WATER ACCESSES FEES 5th installment of 10yr aasesament RoINl5044A water acc fees STORM SEWER 10th 10th Installment p( 10 yr assessment Ro11 #308 BS Prgect. San Sewer Trunk 10th installment q} 70 yr aasesament Roll #309 95 PrgJect, San Sewer Trunk 9th installment q( 10 yr aasesament Roll #311 98.02 Prpjact Sm, Street 8th installment of 10 yr aasesament Roll #5001 98-12 Storm Sewer 8 St Installment of 10 yr assessment Rvll #6018 97-28 son Sewer 7th Instalknent of 9 yr aseeasment Roll #W 18A 97-28 San Sewer 8th Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5027 99-13 Storm Sewer 8th 5th [natallmant of 10 yr asseBSment Roll #5028 99.34 Storm Sewer 5th installment q( 70 yr aasesament Roll #5037 2000.58 Storm Sewer Bth installment of 10 yr aasesament Roll #50A1 200420 Storm Sewer 4th Installment pf Syr aasesament Rall #5018C 87.25 San Sewer 4th installment of iDyr asaesament Roll #5048 2001 Storm Sewer 4th installment of 10yr asae9ament Roll #5049 2009 Storm Sewer Installment vT 10yr aseeasment Rpll #5052 2001 Storm Sewer 3rd 3rd Installment pi 70yr aseeasment Roll#5058 02.18/02 Storm Sewer 2nd installment of 10 r aasesament Y Roll#5059, A & B 02-18!02 Storm Sewer 2nd installment of 10yr asseBSment Roll #5083 03-17 Storm Sewer 2nd Installment W 10yr assessment Roll #5004 03-19 Storm Sewer 1st installment of 10yr assessment Roll#5059C 02.18/02 Storm Sewer 7st installment a110yr assessment Roll#5008 04-0817 Storm Sower 1st Inatallmen[ pf 10yr assessment Roll#5067 04.05 Storm Sewer tat installment ql ipyr assessment Roll #5088 OaDB Stgml Sewer installment of 10yr aseeasment Roll#5089 04-10 Storm Sewer STREET IMPROVEMENTS 10th installment o/ iD yr aasesament Roll #304 95-20 Bi[ Baee 8th 7th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5007 97.02/widening/grading installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5021 98-04 Street 7th Stn installment of 10 yr aseeasment ftcll #50218 97-30 Greding 8i1 and Base 8th Installment pf 10 yr assessment Roll #5028 99-22 8R-Base 6th installment of 10 yr aseeasment Roll #5030 99-36 Blt War course 8th Installment pf 10 yr aseeasment Rall #5033 99-39 Sut>-grads & appur 8th installment of 70yr aasesament Roll #089A 77 PrgJ, def ease activaleq 5th inatallmant of 10yr asae9ament Roll #099q 81 proj, def ease activated 3rd installment of 10yr assessment Roll #5042 2000-24 Street 2nd installment aF 1Dyr aseeasment Roll#5057 D2-D1I02 Grading Gravel Bituminpua Base 2nd installment of 10yr aseeasment Roll #5082 , 03-05 Bituminvus SuAacing installment o! 10yr assessment Roll #5085 03.19 !.stars! Trunk ROW TRUNK SANITARY SEWER 5th 4th Installment of 10yr asSeasment Rall #5043 2000.02 Trunk Sewer 2nd installment of lDyr assessment Roll#5051 2001proj/9442 installment vi 10yr asseBSment Roll #5081 03.01 Trunk & Lateral Sanitary Sewer OFF STREET PARKING/SIOEWALK 9th installment of 15 yr aseeasment Roll #5008 Parking ~th installment of 10 yr aseeasment Roll #5038 98-18 hospital parking Iqt d:lasaesame12004 certifigaticn9:45 AM 5L~~ 1 4th installment of 10yr asaessmenl Roll#5D46A 2001 sidewalk project REASSESSED ROLLS MI$CELLANEOl1S 7th Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll#5024 1898 Misc DEFERRED ASSESSMENT ROLLS ACTIVATED FOR COLLECTION 4th installment o! 10 yr assessment Roll#058B 39!74 gravel base & appurtenances 4th Installment 0110 yr assessment Rall #089A 31/81 sewer & appurtenances 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Rall#0696 37/7A sanitary sewer storm 4th installment of 10 yr assessmedl Rvll#OBOA 01179 sanitary sewer & watermaln 4th Installment Cf 10 yr assessment Roll#109E 33/81 grading & appurtenances 4th installment of 10 yr 9esesement Rvl#f119B 02180 santary sewer 8 appurtenances 4lh installment of 10 yr as8e68ment Roll#1206 02180 watermaln & appurtenances Ath installment of 10 yr assessment Roll#1760 021831runk storm sewer 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll#1798 02/84 gutter/grading/gravel 4th Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll#221 D 10188 watarnain apprurtenances 4th Installment of 10 yr assessment RoIpF230E 17/87 atom! Bawer, littstation 4th installment of 10 yr aBSeaement RaIgf257D 1Df90 gravel have, curb & gutter 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll#3118 02198 storm sewer, grading, gravel base 1st installment vT 10yr assessment Roll #2940 &1.03 Storm Water BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; ALL THESE UNPAID BILLS TO BE CERTIFIED Tl7 2004 TAXES llnpald water, sewer bills, weed cutting, and tree remCVal asrvlce and electric & gas bills tc ba cartlged to taKSa AND RECORDING FEES CERTIFICATION LIST FOR 2004 WEED Cl1TTING BILLS 116-116.28-06-0330 23.062.0040 426 JeMeraan St SE §100.00 OB-118.29.11-1010 23.145.0390 815 Frenklin $t SW 6230.00 31.177-29-10A820 23.058.1520 JLN EnterpHses 94th Ave NE 3189.99 OB•118-29-08-0910 23.050.4810 533 Hassan St $E 3116.dB TREE REMOVAL 01-116x0-01-0600 x3,112.0920 Jamae Wlnkele 6062nd Av. SW S90p,00 LOCK REPAIR 71-117-29-07.1010 x9.088.0480 Narthlend InvesOnent Prop 248 GtlRln Ara NE S14BA8 WATER SHUT OFF VALVE 08-116-29-07-0660 2$.060.3770 Mary Lou a Darlene Fuehe §542.20 WATER aILLg 01.118.90A7.04N 27.120.0010 Keycee Gn.n §38.00 38.117.30.11-0220 29.$10.0190 NNAa Tnrlno 636.00 91.117.28.07.0770 27.100.0010 Melvin KlpCkmm §59.00 a1.117.28.1x-0880 23.058.09911 Beverly $ch9v.ror §36,00 08.118.29-07.04x0 x3.080.]840 David Freund ~ ;14.13 N-11749-09-0120 x8.088.0760 COrletlen OchendnA §$1$,22 08.118.29.17.1010 27.146.0790 Aneheny Monk §292,01 OB-118.28-09.0090 27.0611.0790 Lee a M8ry Caonoy §106.45 01.118.90.10-0170 27.112.1800 Kurt Koldm §40.31 OB-118.29-07A860 x3.060.]770 Dadena Fuch. §315.72 08.118-29-01-0260 2$.060.17$0 t9raCe LlckTah §36,00 87.177.29.10.0860 27.068.1670 Klrk Qued9 5392.42 1x-116-$0.0$.0090 27.012.1 ego JeN Tnxler ;667.52 d:lassessme12D04 certificati0n9:45 AM 5~~~1 12-116.90.19A090 59.012.9000 SernN McRaIM 5186.29 19.118.90A1.OW0 25.019-0600 Bernie McRsltll 513.78 #13.58 51.117.29-1/-0180 29.068.3000 Blen Rix 91-117-29-07.1070 29.OEE.0160 Northland Inv Prop NIP 5433.62 ELECTRIC 6 GAS 91LL8 01-718-30-01-0460 99.119.d9xo 776 Karmony Lene sw 5167.26 O6-116-29-12-0870 x9.ue.a79 727 cwn sr SW 51,124.11 RECORDING FEES ISLAND VIEW HEIGHYS 8TH ADDITION elu cILK 5990.00 Adopted by the Clry Council this 28th day of ~ctOher, 2084 Malin Tdrger9on, Mayor Gary O. Plafz, City Administrator L.J L.J d:Wsseasme~2O04 certification9:48 AM 5~5~1 l J RESOLUTION NO 12539 VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE ON A TWIN HOME LOT LOCATED AT 230/234 OTTAWA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IIUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Paul Betker, applicant, applied for a variance to increase lot coverage from 35% to 38% located at 23U/234 Ottawa Avenue for construction of twin home on the lot. Legad Description: Lot 4, ~8dack 3, SoutAwind 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anhc~pated traffic conditions, and the effect on values gfpropcrties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the variance based on the hardship of the small lot co~guration, but approves the variance with the following conditions: 1. brainage around the units shall not be problematic in that swales, defined drainage areas or grading shall be used to assist in promoting positive drainage. 2. No additional structures shall be added to the property. 3. The site plans dated 9/16/04 and 9/22/04 shall be followed. Any alterations will need further review by the Planning Commission and City Council. L Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October ,2004. ATTEST: Gary b. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 5 Cc,-~ RESOLUTION NO 12540 VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE ON A TWIN HOME LOT LOCATED AT 245/149 OTTAWA AVE. S.E. BE IT RESOLVED 13Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THIS CITY OP HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS Paul $etker, applicant, applied for a variance to increase lot coverage from 35% to 37% located at 245/249 Ottawa Avenue for construction of twin home on the lot. Legal Descriptiau: Lut S, Black I, Southwiud 2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the PlannintghCommission and the effect ogf the anticipated traffict ondit otns,sandityh~e effe ton values ofpropeprties in the surrounding area and the effectt of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the variance based on the hardship of the small lot configuration, but approves the variance with the .following conditions: 1. Drainage around the units shall not be problematic in that swales, defined drainage areas or grading shall be used to assist in promoting positive drainage. 2. No additional structures shat] be added to the property. 3. The site plans dated 9/16/04 and 9/22/04 shall be followed, Any alterations will need further review by the Planning Commission and City Council, Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October ,2004. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 5 C~~ t r ~ DATE: October 20, 2004 Hutchinson Cit Center MEM RAN I1M 111 Hsxxan StreM SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320-587.5151/Fax 320-234-4240 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROMt Hutchinson Pinnning Commission SUB.iECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY PAUL BETKER TO INCREASE LOT COVERAGE ON TWINHOME LOTS LOCATEb AT 230/234 AND 245/249 OTTAWA AVE. S.E. Pursuant to Section 8.05 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Corxunission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recotmnendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. Sl~I TORS The applicant is requesting a variance to increase lot coverage from 35% up to 38% on two lots in the Soudtwind plat. The lots do meet the lot width„ depth and lot area required for a twin home in the R2 district however the square footage of the building covers [he lots 37% to 38% which is not allowed in the R2 requirements. He stated his hardship as the ordinance is too restrictive due to customer demand for larger twin homes. T'he City calculates the building square footage by the building envelope identified on the survey based on section 3, which defines "LOT COVERAGE as the area of a lot occupied by the principal and accessory buildings.". Tv be compliant with the defntition, the City also counts portions of the structure, such as covered entry areas. FINDFIND G~FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the I cjy}~huunn Leader on October 20, 2004. 3. At the public hearing held there were no neighbors present to object tv the request. ~ TION The Planning Corrmtission voted to unanimously rccormnend approval of the variance based on the hardship of the small lot configuration with the following conditions: 1. Drainage around the units shall not be problematic in that swales, defined drainage areas or grading shall be used to assist in promoting positive drainage. 2. No additional structures shall be added to the property. 3. The site plans dated 9/16/04 and 9/22/04 shall be followed, Any alterations will need further review by the Planning Cottmilssion and City Council. Respectfiilly submitted, Dean Kirchoff, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Cortuxtission Cc: I-Iutchinson Land Holdings, 2455-12'" St. E., St. Cloud MN 56304 Bill Watkins, Home Builders Network, 205 East Ridgeville Blvd Ste. C, Mt. Auy MD 21771 Pans Balker, 37 Monroe St. and Randy Redrrtary 37 Monroe St. a;mad °n mc~rk4 pxpar . ~ ~C" J 1 .~....~.~.,~,..~..~,..~~._,.~q~...~~,y._.,,......~~.,.......~._.,..:..~..,_. P . _ .,~~.:...:,.x:..:.,.,.,vr~,,._...u_..DIRECTOR'S REPORTn....~...,..._..n ~.:,... r, , .. To: Hutchinson Planning Commissiop (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) From: Brad Emans, Doli' Moon, Don Nelson, Miles Seppelt, Jacki Pillatzki, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, Myroq Polzin, Michael Kutnm, John Dlson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, [nary Ylotz, Ken Memll, hm Yopp, llan ,Hatter, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: October 4, 2004 - Meetiug Date: October I9, 2004 Applicant: Paul Betker, applicant VARIANCE Brief Description: The applicant is requesting a variance to increase lot coverage from 35% up to 38% on two lots (four units) in the Southwind plat. The lots do meet the lot width, depth and lot area required far a twin home in the R2 district however the square footage of the building covers the lots 37% to 38% which is not allowed in the R2 requirements, lie stated his hardship as the ordinance is too restrictive due to cuatorirer demand for larger twin homes. The City calculates the building square footage by the building envelope identified on the survey based on section 3, which defines "LOT COVERAGE as the area of a lot occupied by the principal and accessory buildings.". Tp be compliant with the definition, the City also counts portions of the structure, such as covered entry areas. (See additional lot coverage memo regarding ordinance). GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R2 (Single and Two Family Residential) Property Location: 230/234 Ottawa St. S.E. and 245/249 Ottawa St. S.E. Lot SPze: 84'X129' and 89' x 135' Existing band Use: Vacant Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: R2 (Single and Two Family Residential) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Zoning I3rstory: The property was annexed in 2002 and platted in 2003. Applicable Regulations: S ection 6.04 of the Zoning Ordinance #464 5f~~ ~ Ottawa Ave. S.E. N/A Address 230 234 249 Lot Size Lot Lot Coverage (in square feet) Coverage with all per impervious 2p32 - 37% 2656 - 49% 2080 - 38% 2680 - 49% 2228 - 38% 2804 - 4$% 2275 - 38% 2851- 47°/a Staff discussed lot coverage and amending the ordinance to address lot coverage. Atter discussion, consensus of the stall' was to allow the increase of lot coverage on the two lots with the hardship of small lot configuration, but to finalize a solution to the issue. Conditions to the variance should include: 1. Iyirainage around the attire shall not be problematic in that swages, defined drainage areas or grading shall be used to assist in promofing positive drainage. 2. No additional structures shall be added to the property. 3. The site plans dated 9/16/04 and 9/22/04 shall be followed. Any alterations will need further review by the Planning Commission and City Council. LJ Variapce Betker - 230/234 Ottawa and 245/249 Ottawa Planning Commission- October 19, 2004 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation; Parking: Analysis and Recommendation: Cc: Hutchinson land Holdings, 2455-121h St. E., SL Cloud MN 56304 Bill Watkins, Home guilders Network, 205 East Ridgeville Blvd Ste. C, Mt. Airy MD 21771 Paul Betker, 37 Monroe St. Randy Redman, 37 Monroe St. ~~] 1 ING PERMIT SURVEY FGR BETKER BUILpERSI LOT 4, BLOCK 3, SOUTHWIN~ ~ I bESCRIPTION OF WESTERLY PARCEL The westerly 42.00 feat aT Lot 4. Block 3, SOUTHWINO, according ro the recorded plot thereof, Oa meawred along the norm and south Imes of sold Ldl 4. DESCRIPTION OF EASTERLY PARCEL Lot 4, Block S, SDUTHWIfIb, according rO me recorded plot rnereot encepr me westerly 42.00 feet of said Loi 4, Os u IS 7u 00 meosUred OIOAg r11w IIW Hr uud south Ilnds rnerddf. ec•Is In Inr PROPO6EO TOP OF FOVMDATIOH IO&7.e PRpP03EU OMA6E BOOR IOfiQ5 • o.rwlp wen manum•m r••ne INa Ye.wnend o Oer,eru Nen man~m•m ael _ _. _.-_.~ n OTTAWA gVENU4 • Oelwln v+iatlnd elevelbn ( 1 Oenew Wapv>•d elevdrbn BM - nn a~P9 ]l.A ~~ r A • 0'58'08• L •84.00 r.r - __ R L••2.Cp ~e `--RT.i " '^' L.aS.00 e•.i . . w. l w ~~r-¢ ~ e ~: I 71 (60.5) r I r ~...~ ( xe ee.• H ~ Sus c"Tw+ I Owp• 6ndde el I` .~. ~ I I N ~CNMARK p~p 1 f001 en IOP Pf eerE En Iha norlMrh •+renebn e/ IM wnr•r rj~ or IM yavaa•d Mus• an Let •, elee% y. (Iwdlbn IOST,BR ~ ni Y..~ MC I h•r eaY ev rlfy toot rule 6u dlreer su P•rvla tan end that 1 rho stale er Mlnn.ee re. PEIIJNEH LAID 9lNlVETW6 r ~'$~ d' id Y r.e I ~ W ~ l PROP0.8m ~ PROPOSED I •~j HOU6~ ~ : ~e s q~ n ~v. x'3~ ' 4li ~ I •xr aR[ Ld0,3) '~I 00.31 a•a I ar.e l erwwr. ~ wwn _ iogw'F ~ `` ~ ..._ ar.y ~ ~B.OD NN8'48'34• W 84.00 ~+ xi - a wle eel' Plan ar R•P•rr re. pr •POr •d er ww ar under mr e Ouly Ilmnead Land fivrrger undo rh• tare vi Lla. Hv. ~y~ 0are:~ - ~ MN uoB N0. BK P-SSY ~~ola3~l SC~~\ BUILpING PERMIT SURVEY FpR BE7KER BUILDERS LOT 5, BIpCK I, 50UTHWIND oeStRlPnpN fae wESniRLr PARCEL IDa' pl~x; ei Lar 'J. Bleep I, $tlUT11Np10, ecexanp re rM q<xded pyr Ihxeaf, hpq teat of a pry de rtvgad dlerormv alaN. IM faurhavat [stoat of avrd Let x rMnev evaxly, aenp rb aomb Imr or eak Lot ~ .r prq al avq Le ~ hx rv rM Ovapvlxq vl Iha Xm tv b. deaerOed: man[a nxrMtly, pxapvl •pp M. rpr o divonca of Ip.yB Nel w me mrm Poe o} aad Lot p erld Gold Iles IMre rxmlmr•na, pESCRIPnpR Fpl EASTEflLV PARCEL Thpf pxr of Lx 5, Bbeh I, 9ol1TXM1Np. avexdlrw le rM r.<urdv0 f/tm rhmef. m rollvue: hhx sear of a Ilnr des<rgaW dlar~e~ aTDM ~ /~~, Ivrlpe 6eg1 n of Geld Lvl 5: tMn[e evalxly, gang rM awM one of aWd Lee 5 u IMe of axd Lel D v aaronee ee 193.Y~B rypMe Ane ro oe eeaur4ed: thanes eonhxly, paropel rlfA me teat ro the Hann Ynv o} aeW Lol 5 and saW pm rhxv MralMxBno. N °•~~-_ [tale In Ivor • Derwrea han rronumem hand o parwwa tan manumem avr Berrorea eaNNnp Nevarlpn Benelp prepwea tlvyalbn EDMONTON AVENUE arnl xii eAx v-e ew Kae ae.x cewa mar= ._ ~'r.a 588°33'25"E 89.gp e M.9o eta aRe d0.5o ae _ -awr.a ae: ~ f5Ae7~ =~ ~ w // ~~ ae,l ( e y IaR1 ~ / !59.81 ~ ee. ;R,I a de.a aeA ae2 5140 Ia ~ ~ ~' testa I _ ~ ~ ~ /i iL I V PROPV9Ep - ; PRpP•SE~ I 3 I Mpu9E C: XOI)SE p w ~ R E~ ra 1 w ro N r i [p ~ I I ` ~~ aw e.1r ~ ~ ~ elr. J I au I ~~ jaF e41 Gaave I d R1 ~~ 4 ~ I 390 !59,91 av.r • ~- ~ (58,61 II eRa I Me - i-J L-M. 1 L.M.a7 yaw. A•I'Dp'30" L•88.Op ..v~r as ,-~~?. Iran eg ja a••, .u• seer l edn OTTAWA AVENUE BEf1LRAWRN „eRF Palm apvl en rap of app eeyfn of rM wnlxllnv vl LOf D. Bbch I. Elvyplbn - IaDT.R6 W _~ PflaPpSEp TOp pF FOBRppTgfl . I~ PRf~O51;p BARABE FLOpR - IOBpp (Nr Barxrnn 1 Her aby <x rlfy that rh 1. p1 dlraar dupery la len and roar I rh• 9rd ra of Mlnn eaa ta. wn ~. Plan ar Reparr rva pr spar rd by ms ar undw my a duly Ileenavd Lend Sur eater vadx rh• lard of u[. Rp.aYeTaj Derr. ~ JOB rq. dame Btc a~s~ a~ q 5~~~~ A REVISION TO HUTCHIN50N CITY CODE CHAPTER 73 TO 1NCLUD)E REGULATIONS OF MOTORIZED SCOOTERS §73.17 Motorized Scooters For the purpose of this section, the following definition shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. Motorized Scooter. Aself-propelled vehicle or power assisted vehicle drawn by a motor having a piston displacement capacity of 25 cubic centimeters or less or an electric motor that is incapable of propelling the vehicle at a speed in excess of 20 miles per hour on a flat surface. A) Operating Restrictions. It is unlawful for any person to operate a motorized scooter on a public sidewalk or walkway provided or used for pedestrian travel; on any public street, highway or right-of--way, unless licensed pursuant to Minnesota law; or on publicly owned land including school grounds, park property, playgrounds, or recreation areas. B) Exceptions. This section does nat apply to licensed mopeds, motorized/electric- assisted bicycles or electric personal assistive mobility devices as defined and regulated by state law. C) Penalty. Whoever violates any provision of this chapter for which no other penalty has been established shall be punished as provided in § 10.99 of this code. ~.J ~J ~ z~~ ~.J HE 1T RESOLVED HY THE CITY CQUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHE15ON, MN: FINIJ C .J RESOLUTION Np. 12537 RESULUTION APYRDVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNEb DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO 6E KNOWN AS HUTCHINSON SENIOR CAMPUS SUHMI'1'TFD BY FARR DEVELOPMENT 1. The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat to be known as Hutchinson Senior Campus located south of Applebee's and north ofMenard's. This property was recently annexed by Farr Development for a mixed use concept with commercial along Iiwy 15 S. and a mixture of residential housing types to the cast of the commerctal development. The majority of the residential housing is anticipated tv focus on senior housingg with possible student housing incorporated in the development. There is a request to rezone the property from Rl (Sutgle fanuly) to R4 (Multiple family) and C4 (Fringe Commercial); within the context of the Planned Development Process. LEGAL DFSCRIPI'ION: Lot 20, Auditor's Plat of Scc. 7-116-29, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING those parts platted as MENARD ADDITION and Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-of--Way Plat No. 43-19 2, The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the pr sed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Z.vning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below aze met. CONS The City Council hereby approves the preliminary plat and planned development district with the following; 1. Development phasing. How is the development going to phased; in temts of constmction, utilities, and roadways. 2. Identify the City's plan on how Denver Avenue will be constructed. 3. Obtain Applebee's perspective on the l?enver Avenue design and reconfiguration of then entrance. 4. Have closure on tree planting responsibilities. 5. Obtain draft copies or outlines of how the homeowners' associations will operate. 6. Gain any additional connnents on the architectural components from the Planning Commission. The above items rtutst be resolved before action of Final Plat will be taken. Adopted by the City Council this 26i° day of Octahcr, 2004. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor L~~ PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. U4-390 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF TFIE CITY OF IIUTCIIINSON FOR A PROPERTY TO BE REZONED FROM RI TO C4 AND RA AS REQUEST>~D $Y FARR DEVELOPMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITI' OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: WHEREAS, the following described real property is hereby rezoned from Rl(Single Family Residential) to R4 (High Density Residential) and C4 (Fringe Commercial) as requested by property owner; LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 20, Auditor's Plat of Sec. 7-116-29, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING those parts platted as MENARD ADDITION and Minnesota Department of Transportation Right-of--Way Plat No. 43-19 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission and City Council have considered the effects of rezoning this piece of property; WHEREAS, there are certain parameters that will make this rezoning appropriate for this area; THEREFORE; the City hereby officially rezones this property to R4 and C4 and it shall take effect upon publication of this ordinance; Adopted by the City Council this 9'h day of November, 2004 ATTEST: Gary D. Plot2 City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor ~ ] Hutchinson Cit Center llr Hassan Street SE HuteNnson, MN ggJ50.2522 3y0.587-glgl/Fax 320-y3q-g24p MEMORANDUM DATE; October 20, 2004 TO: Hutchinson City Council I+BOM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARX PLAT TO BP KNOWN AS HUTCHINSON SENIOR CAMPUS, RlrZONING FROM RI TO R4 AND C4 AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT bISTR1CT Pursuant to Sections 12.10 of the Subdivision Ordinance and 6.05 and 8.17 of Hutchinson P1 7pni~o Ordinance No. 464, the among Cotmrvssion is hereby submitting its £mdings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary plat, rezoning and planned development district. SFII TO$Y The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat to be known as Hutchinson Senior Campus located south of Applebee's and nprth of Menard's. This property was recently annexed by Fan Development for a mixed use concept with commercial along llwy 15 S. and a mixture of residential housing types to the east of the commercial development. The majority of the residential housing is anticipated to focus on senior housing with possible student housing inearporated in the development. There is a request to rezone the property from RI (Single family) ro R4 (Multiple family) and C4 (Fringe Cottnnercial); within the context of the Planned Development Process. IN SOFF 1. The required application and fee was subnairted . 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on October 7, 2004. 3. There were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request. 4. The entire site would be considered a Planned Unit Development. The process for the Planned Unit Development includes outlining the parameters of the ADD and what setback standards would be met. It would also require additional review m the future, if there are substantial changes to the plat arrangement.One of the main considerations in a PDD is the open space requirement. The development information indicates that the total site has an open space factor of 34%. Where as the cornmcrcial area has 26%; the residential area has 43% open space. The requirement for open space is 20% should be dedicated to passive or active recreation. The term open space shall not include streets or parking area. Additionally, the private open space does not count toward meeting the park dedication requirements (Secion 8.17). 5. The commercial area is designed to accommodate 4 lots: 72,721; 41,449; 60,668; and 54,408 square feet, respectively, The lot dimensional standards in the C4 district are typically 43,560 square foot nlinirruults. One of the lots is below that amount, but seem to accommodate the appropriate building site. The concept would be similar to Target/Offce Max area in that cross parking agreement and maintenance would be conductedjoin0y. 6. 'The residential area includes a very diverse set of housing types: `. ".°. 40 units 1'awnhotncs ack to back 36 units 3 sets - 12 units each Row Townhomes 22 units 7 complexes 6 -3 units• 1 - 4 unit Senior Apartments/Candc ~ 60 units Ind Indent Lrvrn 60 units Assisted Livin 30 units Skilled Nursin SD units Total 328 units ~'~~ \ i [[n ts r acre Finding trf Fact -October 20, 20D4 . Hutchinson Senior Campus Preliminary Plat, Reaoning and Planned Development District Page 2 The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates that this area is designated for public use; possibly assuming the College would have purchased the property. Hpwever, Waxed used designations are indicated in the area. That use guides 5-18+ units per acre. The PDD process allows for a density increase of 100% if the development is for elderly staff and the Planning Commission believe the project has a high degree of excellence and public benefit. The Planning Commission and City Council need to determine this based on the 1. location, amount and proposed use of common open space; 2. location, design and type of dwelling units, and 3. physical chazacteristics of the site (Section 8.17). 7. The street configuration would be in the following groups: Denver Avenue Denver Avenue would be proposed to be extended through Applehee's area and connect to Sutnmerset 3`" Addition. The alignment of Denver would have to impact the Ridgewater College property. Staffhas nret with College representatives; however, no final designs or acquisitiens have been conunitted to at this time. Staff has contacted Applebee's corporate office, but have not met with them at the date of this report. The entrance and parking lot for Applebees must be discussed ¢t terms of how it relates to Denver Avenue construction. There would be a trail constricted with the project. The project would be City constmcted and then assessed ro the benefiting properties. From a design perspective, a full entry onro Denver is not recommended. Manrreal Streer Montreal Street would connect to the street in front Menards. This area would be constmcted by the developer and would also contain a trail area. The £nral design should have appropriate turn lanes and improvements. Highway JS There would need to be a taro lane added to State Highway 15 (northbound). This could be pan of the Denver Avenue project. Private Jnterior Streets The majority of the development, from the residential area, will be accessed through a private street. The streets in this area arc proposed ro be 24 feet wide and are designed to have a cohesive street pattern. 8. Parking Commercialdevelopmenrasfollows.• Service Station - 4 spaces per service stall (12 stalls proposed - 48) Restaurants - 1 space per table or 2 stools (7 Unknown at this time) Retail Business - 5.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. (11,200 square feet- 61.6) Other Commercial - 5.5 per 1,OOD sq, ft. (If used to estimate restaurant - 43) The proposed layout has 218 stalls. All of the uses would add up to 152 required stalls under the parking regulations. The only item that would change that would be additional tables m the restaurant. if the restaurant had 50 tables that would equate to 50 spaces. There maybe too much parking in the proposed plan. The layout would cross property lines; and therefore would oat meet typical C4 requirements. Residential development as follows: Apartment building for the elderly - 0.5 per dwelling unit Apartment building - 1 space plus 0.5 in common For visitors per bedroom Townhouses 3-8 unit - 2 spaces plus 0.5 in common per dwelling unit 2 family townhouse - 2 spaces per dwelling unit Using the regulations listed about; the requirements would equate to 320 spaces. The site plan provides for 455 spaces (excluding garages) far a 1.74 space per unit ratio. 9. There are no wetlands on the property. 10. The storm water treatment area is located in the southern portion of the residential area. There were some concerns raised by staff regarding the drainage W the ditch along State Highway 15. Final construction plans can detail if additional catch basins or grading is necessary. The pond const<ttction would be the third phase of a regional stormwater pond (Menard's, Summerset, and Farr). The pond will be abutting the northern portion of the Menard's pond area. There is also a pond located behind or to the east of the entry condominium units. As with al] drainage projects in this area, staffhas alerted the developer about rile lines in the area and the potential cotitplicatinns during construction. I I. $ecause this project involves a £air amount of private street constmctron. The City would typically require 656 trees for a development of 328 residential units. Because the project involves vertical densities and a site that would nor accommodate 656 trees; the developer has indicated 413 trees and 182 shrubs in the residential area. The plan also indicates 102 tree plantings in the commercial area. Based on the requirement for commercial ~ ~~ landscaping, I tree per 800 square feet of open area would equate to 75 trees. Staff needs to Cmalize; whether Finding of Fact -October 20, 2004 1lutchinson Senior Campus Preliminary Plat, Reaoning and Planned Development District Page 3 the Ciry would require an escrow and plant the boulevazds on Denver and Montreal or if the developer should simply escrow dollars to complete the plantings and the City would release the money when plantings arc complete. The park dedication calculation for the commercial area would equate to $4,515. The park dedication rate for the residential azea would be $135 per unit. These fees are collected at the time of building permit. 12. SAC/WAC charges in 2004 are $2200.00 per unit (note this fee increases every year). There are additional calculations and formulas used to properly rate multiple family, senior projects. This development is within the electric service territory area, as it was annexed, therefore does have to pay a charge of $800.00 per unit. There is an additional calculation made for commercial and multiple family projects. The above costs are collected with the building permit fees. An escrow maybe required to ensure rree planting. When the subdividers agreement is corrrpleted, this amount will be calculated. 100% of the project improvement costs must be secured by a bond or letter of credit by the developer. Additionally; a 7% engineering fee will be required for the City to monitor the private development construction. These fees are all collected prior to the development construction commencing. Assessments Far the road project will also be identified and placed on the property. COMM ATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the preliminary plat, planned development district and rezoning with the followittg conditions: 1. Development phasing. How is the development going to phased; in terms of constmction, utilities, and roadways. 2. Identify the City's plan on how Denver Avenue will 6e constmcted. 3. Obtain Applebee's perspective on the Denver Avenue design and recan£guration of their entrance. 4. Have closure an tree planting responsibilities. S. Obtain draft copies ar outlines of how the homeowners' associations will operate. 6. Gain any additional comments on the architectural components firm the Planning Commission. The above items must be resolved before action of Final Plat wi116e taken. Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirchoff, Chaimtan Hutchinson Planning Cormnissivn Cc: 13en Schmidt, Farr Development, 172 Hamel Rd, Hamel MN 55340 i.ucinda Gardner, Farr Development, 172 Hamel Rd, Hamel MN 55340 Brian Johnson, Westwood Services, 7599 Anagram Dr, Eden Prairie MN 55344 ~~~ 6^sr,,...a~,s_„._._,_~+ ,,._.~.._DIRECTORS REPORT._.._.._.__....._w._~-,..w.~..,..,,.,.~. To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (In bold) Froth: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Miles Seppelt, Jacki Pillatzki, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, Myron Polzin, Michael Ktunnt, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Crary Plokz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan Flatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz Date: t7ctober 4, 2004 -Meeting Date: October 19, 2004 Applicant: Farr Development -Property Owner PRELIM1NAItX PLAT ,REZONING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Brief Description The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat to be lmown as Hutchinson Senior Campus located south of Applebee's and north of Menard's. This property was recently annexed by Parr Development for a mixed use concept with commercial along Hwy 15 S. and a mixture of residential housing types to the east of the commercial development. The majariry of the residential housing is anticipated to focus on senior housing with possible student housing incorporated in the development. There is a request to rewne the property from Rl (Single family) to R4 (Multiple family) and C4 (Fringe Commercial); within the context of the Planned Development Process. GENERAL INFORMATION LJ Existing Zoning: Rl (Single Family Residential) Property Location: 1315 Hwy 15 5 Lot Sine: 22 Acres Existing Land Use: Single Family and Residential Adjacent Land Uae And Zoning: C4 (Fringe Commercial) and R2 (Single and Two Family Residential) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public Zoning History: The property was annexed to the city on August 12, 2004. Applicable Regulations: Section 12.10 o£the Subdivision grdinance. ~~~~ Preliminary Plat, Rezoning and Planned development District Hutchinson Senior Campus Planning Commission- October 19, 2004 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATIQN Zoning District Request The entire site would be considered a Planned Unit Development. The process for the Planned Unit Development includes outlining the parameters of the PDD and what setback standards would be met. It would also require additional review in the future, if there are substantial changes to the plat arrangement. One of the main considerations in a PDD is the open space requirement. The development infoxmativn indicates that the total site has an open space factor of 34%. Where as the commercial area has 26%; the residential area has 43% open space. The requirement far open space is 20% should be dedicated to passive or active recreation. The term open space shall not include streets or parking area. Additionally, the private open space does not count toward meeting the pazk dedication requirements (Secion 8.17). Lot Arrattgetnent Commercial Area The commercial area is designed to accommodate 4 lots: 72,721; 41,449; 60,668; and 54,908 square feet, respectively. The lot dimensional standards in the C4 district are typically 43,560 square foot minimums. One of the lots is below that amount; but seem to accommodate the appropriate building site. The concept would be similar tv TargedOffice Max area in that cross parking agreement and maintenance would be conducted jointly. Residential area The residential area includes a very diverse set of housing types: A artments 4D units Townhomes back to back 36 units 3 sets - 12 units each Row Townhomes 22 units 7 co lexes 6 -3 units• 1 - 4 unit Senior A artments/Condo 60 units lnd endent Livin 60 units Assisted Lip 30 units Skilled Nursin 80 units Total 328 units Densi 21 units er acre The City's Comprehensive Plan indicates that this area is designated For public use; possibly assuming the College would have purchased the property. However, mixed used designations are indicated in the area. That use guides 5-18+ units per acre. The PDD process allows for a density increase of 100% if the development is for elderly and staff and the Planning Commission believe the project has a high degree of exuclln3~ce and public benefit. 'Che Planning Conunission and City Council need to determine this based on the 1. location, amount and proposed use of common open space; 2. location, design and type of dwelling units, and 3. physical characteristics of the site (Section 8.17). Street Confignration The street configuration would be in the following groups: Denver Avenue Denver Avenue would be proposed to be extended through Applebee's area and connect to Summerset and Addition. "Ihe alignment of Denver would have to impact the Ridgewater College ~} // ~~ \ W~ Preliminary Plat, Rezoning and Planned development District Hutchinson Senior Campus Planning Comttvssiop_ October 19, 2004 . Page 3 property. Staff has met with College representatives; however, no final designs or acquisitions have been committed to at this time. Staff has attempted contact with Applebee's corporate office, but have not met with them at the dart of this report The entrance and parking lot for Applebees must be discussed in terms of how it relates to Denver Avenue construction. There would be a trail constructed with the project. The project would be City constructed and then assessed to the benefiting properties. At the staff meeting there was a lot of discussion regarding the entry point off of Denver Avenue into the gas station area. It is apparent that from a design perspective a full entry onto Denver is not recommended. Montreal Street Montreal Sneet would connect to the street in front Menards. This area would be constructed by the developer and would also contain a trail area. The final design should have appropriate rum lanes and improvements. Highway I S There would need to be a rum lane added to State Tiighway 15 (northbound). 'T'his could be part of the Denver Avenue project. Private /nterior Sireeu The majority of the development, from the residential area, will be accessed through a private street. lire streets in this area are proposed to be 24 feet wide and are designed to have a cohesive street pattern. Parking Commercial development as fnldows: Service Station -- 4 spaces per service stall (12 stalls proposed - 48) Restaurants - I space per table or 2 stools (? Unknown at this time) Retail Business -- 5.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. (11,200 square feet- 61.6) Other Commercial - 5.5 per 1,000 sq. ft. (If used to estimate restaurant - 43) The proposed layout has 218 stalls. All of the uses would add up to 152 required stalls under the parking regulations. The only item that would change that would be additional tables in the restaurant. If the restaurant had SO tables that would equate to SO spaces. There maybe too much parking in the proposed plan. The layout would cross property lines; and therefore would not meet typical. C4 requirements. Residential development as follows: Apartment building for the elderly - 0.5 per dwelling unit Apartment building -- 1 space plus 0.5 in common for visitors per bedroom Townhouses 3-8 unit - 2 spaces plus 0.5 in common per dwelling unit 2 family townhouse - 2 spaces per dwelling unit Using the regulations listed above; the requirements would equate to 320 spaces. The site plan provides for 455 spaces (excluding garages) fora 1.74 space per unit ratio. Wetland Areas Staff has received the report regarding wetlands; and the report indicates there are no wetlands on the property. ~ ~~~ Preliminary Plat, Rezoning and Planned development District Hutchinson Senior Campus Planning Commission-- October 19, 2004 Page 4 Storm Water Treatment The storm water treatment area is located in the southern portion of the residential area. There were some concerns raised at the staff meeting about the drainage in the ditch along State Highway 15. Final construction plans can detail if additional catch basins ar grading is necessary, The pond construction would 6e the third phase of a regional stormwater pond (Menard's, Summerset, and Farr). The pond will be abutting the northern portion of the Menard's pond area. There is also a pond located behind or to the east of the entry condominium units. As with all drainage projects in this area, staff has alerted the developer about rile lines in the area and the potential complications during construction. Landscaping, Tree Planting and Park Dedication Because this project involves a fair amount of private street construction. Staff would offer the following to meet the tree planting ordinance. The City would typically require 656 trees far a development of 328 residential units. Because the project involves vertical densities and a site that would not accottunodate 656 trees; the developer has indicated 413 trees and 182 shrubs in the residential area. The plan also indicates 102 tree plantings in the commercial area. Based an the requirement for commercial landscaping, 1 tree per 800 square feat of open area would equate to 75 trees. Staff needs to finalize; whether dre City would require an escrow and plant the boulevards on Denver and Montreal or if the developer should simply escrow dollars to complete the plantings and the City would release the money when plantings arc complete. The park dedication calculation for the commercial area would equate to $4,515. The park dedication rate for the residential area would be $135 per unit. These fees are collected at the time of building peratit. Architectural Components (PDA requires) There axe renderings of the proposed buildings. The most intense land uses are in the central portion of the residentral area. The buildings are 3 stories high and would be the first type of development like this. The PDD discusses the review of architectural details, however discusses the fact that it may not be the sole basis for a decision. The code contemplates discussion about overall appearance and wrrtpatibility. Staff would recommend inconsideration of the design of the tune[ like feature on the eastern condo building. Homeowners Documents Staff has not received an outline of how the common open space would be managed. The number and type of associations need to 6e identified and draft documents need to provided. The commercial area cross parking and maintenance agreements must also be submitted. Fees SAC/WAC charges in 2004 arc $2200.00 per unit (note this fee increases every year). There is additional calculations and formulas used to properly rate multiple family, senior projects. This development is within the electric service territory area, as it was annexed, therefore does have to pay a charge of $800.00 per unit. There is an additional calculation made far commercial and multiple family projects. The above costs arc collected with the building permit Fees. An escrow. may be required to ensure tree planting. When the subdividers agreement is completed, this amount will be calculated. 100% of the project improvement costs must be secured by a bond or letter of credit by the developer. Additionally; a 7% engineering fee will 6c required for the City to monitor the prvate development constmctivn. These fees are all collected prior to the development construction commencing. Assessments for the road project will also be identified and placed on the property. ~ ~~~ Preliminary Plat, Rezoning and Planned development District Hutchinson Senior Campus Planning Commission-~ Qcto6er 19, 2004 Page S Recommendation There are many considerations for this development. While staff was generally Favorable to the concept, density, unit types, general site layout; staff would request additional time to consider the following: 1. Development phasing. How is the development going to phased; in terms of construction, utilities, and roadways. 2. Identify the City's plan an how Denver Avenue will be constructed. 3. Obtain Applebee's perspective on the Denver Avenue design and reconFguration of [heir entrance. 4. Flave closure on free planting responsibilities. 5. Obtain draft copies or outlines of how the homeowners' associations will operate. 6. Gain any additional comments on the architectural components from the Planning Commission. Cc: Ben Schmidt, Farr Development, 172 Hamel Rd, Hamel MN 55340 Lucinda Gardner, Farr Development, 172 Hamel Rd, Hamel MN 55340 Brian Johnson, Westwood Services, 7599 Anagram Dr, Eden Prairie MN 55344 IvINDOT C_~ J ~~~] rsor~ Minnesota Department ai Transportation ~~~~q Di3irlCt S - WillmadMarshalllHutchinson v'`-¢ 2505 Transportation Road Willmar, MN 56201 ~J October 13, 2004 Bonnie Baumetz Planning Coordinator Hutchinson Ciry Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Preliminary plat -Hutchinson Senior Campus Near Highway 15 and Denver Ave. M.P. 99.713 Dear Hvrmie: Office Tcl: RECENEb ocT z s Zoaa ~nf o~pt2 $ g~ Fax: 320-231-5195 800-657-3792 320-231-5168 www.dot.state.mn.us MrJDOT received the preliminary plat submitted by Farr Development for the proposed Hutchinson Senivr Campus. Upon review of the plat, Mn/DOT otfers the following comments and recommendations: • 'T'he closure o£the existing field and farm entrances on Highway I5. • Request controlled access of the 45' z 250' section and require aright-rum lane be built on Highway 15 northbound lent at Denver Avenue at the developer's expense. • The main entrance to Applebees should be relocated to the east, behind the restaurant. • Applicant is advised to contact Geri Vick at 320.214.3776 to obtain a permit application before any work is performed along the state highway. Mn/170T appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on any site development plans or zoning rcugests on properties adjacent to state highways. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at 320.214.3753. Thank you. Sincerely, Patrick Weidemann Director of Planning Mn/DOT District 8, Willmar cc: Ceri Vick, Sandy East, Dave Johnston, Barry Anderson An tqual opportunity cmplayer (1 ~~~ r-~ • _: ~~: f~ .y- ~.. ~~ ~_ ~, ~ ~: - ~ ~~ -< ~-~y]~ ' j ~ ~ 1 ~f ~ L __ ~ ~r-~ ._ .~ i Y u -- ~S l _ ~-! ~ - L. fj ~' \ `i ~., Z~. ~~ -----~ e~ ~ ~~ _ ~ - .`'`~~ ~~~ ~ J /, ~ _ t. ~ - (v 1 <, ~'~~ _~ r =f _ , ~3 y i `.~. ~ . . r!l ~./ / V .~-~~ "` z n ® ~. r +r ~' ?- - ,."6 '.'k~~ ,ei ~ ~~, 1 F~ A. F..7 i } ~~ ~~~ ~- . ;,~ v I . ~_ ~ ~: , Darrel A. Farr Development Corporation Creating Great Communities About Us . , . 40 year history ofi creating great communities Apartments, town-homes, single family homes, condominiums, and speciaEizing in senior housing. Senior housing expertise: Staff with more than 150 years of combined experience ~ 15 senior housing developments; more than 1,100 units Sought after for our award winning architecture and design and "campus style" senior developments Innovator in creating the town square concept with a senior community (Copperfield Hill 1984} _~ Recognized as 2003 industry Leader in Senior Housing by MADAC (Multi-housing Achievement in Design, Advertising and Community support} Rose Arbor [Assisted Living & Independent Living) voted Best New Senior Development far 2003 Wildflower Lodge [Memory Care} voted Best Renovation in Senior Housing 2003 u Success ft~l Senior Deti-eio~ments H~~ve 3 I~e~T Drivers Demographics ~ Must analyze the needs of the community, anticipated growth patterns and the relationship with other communities • Site Selection ~ Even the best planned community will fail if its not in the right location -what matters most Being close to the action Proximity to the local hospital Relationship with the local hospital ^ Well planned carefully designed, user friendly and effective implementation ~~~~ introduction to same o~ our developments Gladstone -Residential planned community Copperfield Hill -Senior housing Rose Arbor & Wildflower Lodge -Senior housing ~- u Cedars of Austin -Senior housing Woodland Mounds -Senior housing Prairie Grass Communities -Senior housing Hutchinson -Senior housing r. ~w.... ~` e ~' i A } ~ 1 ~'~ - . _ E '~.~~ .,~` ~,.~ a x ~~ ~'sy ~ fi t. ~~: '~~, ' i ~,~ ~ P '~ ,tti~ ~ ~ ~ ~~d f, ~ is ~~ ~' ` ' E~r, ~ ~ ~ ,m. ~~ ~~ F'~ ~ ,` '~,~ la' L ~ ~ ~ ~ i% ~It r'y~ CV J7 3 ; # ~ )~ ~ ~ .. M ~ r~ ~ r y W Ty n' .,i i ~! ~ E ~ . ." ~I 1 ~~' ~ v n _~! :: 1. i:r ,_ W, ~. ..; v O A ~ ~- r _. ?~~~~ ~~ ~r~ jai d s. ..'L .. ... _,. ~...~..... ~. :~~°. ~' r, ~,...... ~. °-_ ~1' ..,,~ x r ~ ~~, ~ .,~ -~ ~ .~ ~, ~. :. ~. ~,~ ~~ .~ _ :,~ . "~ - i o r y -~ .. f ^~. 1 '~ r~ j~ ~ ~ - ~A ~~ a :~,~~ ~ I® .~~" 1 ~ ~ 5. : ,.. , iii ..' I k r~ °' ss'- ~ ~ ^~ ~^ ~ '~ ~~ ~r ~-. ~..] ~ ~a r ~~ ~~ u ~~,~ ~~^ ,I ~°• ~~ ~, ~ r--i i n ~I I u 'w.d ~' i r i h~„ i i I ~ ~ ~ .. 3., ~'µ~, ..: ~~ r~, a I Mp ~'~ ~, ,~ ,p~~ '~".~ ..,~ . ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' . ~ ~~ ~+ ~ ? ~ ~ ., ~" ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~_ '~." ~ •~... ~~.. ~, Mme"" "~ ~~~,~ :; `./ t ~~ ~, ., .~, ~,,.. :_.. ,. ,~~ ~, ~~~ ~~w, rte; ,~.a ~.~ ".~ `w.. ,~ ~.~ ~`~ ~~ ~~ ~.d -`"'~ ~.. « . „~ .~ ~" ....~ ~- , ~ ~.~. :r. ~~ ~. w.~ ~.~~ '.~ ~~ µ~~" :.~~ • Hutchinson Senior a i ~~ Housing -Where we are at today7.. . . Analyzed the demographics and saw a that the needs of seniors in Hutchinson and the surrounding area were not being met Determined that Hutchinson with its first rate hospital is becoming the regional health care center for the area Made ~refiminary determinations regarding housing type, style and mix needed for the area Looked for an appropriate site which would meet our demands relative to our site plan, the need to be close to the action and perhaps most importantly proximity to the local hospitallclinic Initiated conversations with the hospital to determine level of interest in a senior housing project and to discuss the possibility of working together on the project -discussions are ongoing We are completing out preliminary site plans and anticipate submitting a preliminary plat for approval in September We look forward to bringing our passion anti expertise to what is sure to be Hutchinson's premier senior campus C~ BE IT RESOLVED BY TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS VARIANCE REQUESTED BY LEE STRITESKY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE IN TIIE FRONT XARD LOCATED AT 1005 LEWIS AVE. Lee Stritesky, property owner, applied for a variance to allow for the construction of a 36' x 24' garage in the front yard at 1005 Lewis Ave. SW Legat Description: The East 100 feet of Lot 4 of Auditor's P/at of that part of the Northwest Quarter of Section I, Township II6, Range 30 ying South of the Mill Pand 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The City Council hereby approves the variance based on the hardship of the excessive slope in the rear and side yard ,but approves the variance with the following conditions: RF,SOLUTION NO 12538 1. Provide elevation drawings and plans of the garage. 2. The garage must match the house siding and shingles. 3. Screening of plantings must be located on the South side of the garage. 4. Replace the tree that will be removed in the construction. 5. Moving of utilities will be at owner's expense. 6. Any water or sewer service line relocation, if necessary, will be at the owner's expense. 7. The drainage to the neighboring property may not be altered. 8. Garages must not be taller than 16 feet. 9. Detached garages may not be used entirely for home occupations. 1 Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October ,2004. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor Gi ~. C DATE: October 20, 2004 Hutchinson Ct~Center 111 HaxSSn Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320.557.5151/Fax 320.234.4240 MEMORANDUM TO: IIutclthtson Cily Cuwrcil FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARLINCE REQUESTED 13Y LEE STRITESICY TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 3b'X 24' GARAGE IN THE FRONT YARD LOCATED AT 1005 LEW IS AVEE. Pursuant to Section 7.14 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its ftndings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for the construction of a garage in the front yard located at 1005 Lewis Ave. He notes his hardship as the lack of flat ground on which to build the garage with an excessive slope in the rear and side yard. The fluctuating topography tv the river is a unique circumstance of the lot. FINDINGS OF~A~ 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed [a the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutch' n Leader on October 20, 2004. 3. At the public heating held there was a neighbor present ro object to the request. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to unanimously recommend approval of the variance based on the hardship of the excessive slope in the rear and side yard with the following conditions: 1. Provide elevation drawings and plans of the garage. 2. The garage must matckt the house siding and shingles. 3. Screening of plantings must be located on the South side of the garage. 4. Replace the tree that will be removed in the construction. 5. Moving of utilities will be at owner's expense. 6. Any water or sewer service line relocation, if necessary, will be at the owner's expense. 7. The drainage to the neighboring property may not be altered. 8. Garages must not be taller than 16 feet. 9. Detached garages may not be used entirely for home occupations. Respectfully submitted, Dean Kirchofl; Chairman Hutchinson Planniny Commission Cc: Lee Striteslry, 1005 Lewis Ave. S.W. ~~4~ra,~~_ ~ ~G~ DIRECTOR'S REPORT C~ To: Hutchinson Planning Commission (Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Miles Seppeit, Jaclu Pillatzki, Jean Ward, John Rodebetg, P.E., Kent Exner, Myrop Polzin, Michael Kamm, John t7lson, Lenny Rutledge, Barry Greive, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Schora, Gary Plotx, Ken Merrill, Jiut Popp, Dau Haueu, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and $onnie Baumetz bate: October 4, 2004 -Meeting Date: October I9, 2004 Applicant: Lee Stritesky, property owner VARIANCE Brief Description: The applicant is requesting a variance to allow for the construction of a garage in the front yard located at 1005 Lewis Ave. He notes his hardship as the lack of flat ground on which to build the garage witty an excessive slope in the rear and side yard. The fluctuating topography to the river is a unigtte circumstance of the lot. GENERAL INFORMATION ~~ L Existing Tuning: Rl (Single Family Residential) Property Location: 1005 Lewis Ave. S. W. I,ot Size: 100' X 350' Existing Land Use: Single Family Residential Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Rl (Single Family Residential) and RZ (Single and Two Family Residential) Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Traditional Residential Neighborhood Tuning Ilistory: N/A Applicable Regulations: Section 6.04 of the Zoning t7rdinance #464 SPECIAL AVFORMATIUN Transportation: Lewis Ave. S.W. ~ C~~ Variance Lee Stritesky -1005 Lewis Ave. S. W. Planning Commission- October 19, 2004 Page 2 Parking: N/A Analysis and Reeammendativn: It is not uncommon to have requests for detached buildings in the front yard (street side) portion of Lakeshore properties. Staff would recommend approval of the request based on the hardship of the excessive slope in the rear and side yard with the following conditions: 1. Moving of utilities will be at owner's expense. 2. Any water or sewer service line relocation, if necessary, will be at the owners expense. 3. City Forester will verify the tree is located as not to be damaged by the construction of the garage. 4. The drainage to the neighboring property may not be altered. S. Garages must not be tall~~yy~~' than 16 feet. ti. Detached garages mayQ1@~be used entirely for home occupations. Cc: Lee Stritesky, 1005 Lewis Ave. 5. W. qcG~ CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR RICHARD CARSON BUILDERS OESCRIP TION PROVIOEO The East IW feet pf Lot 4 ai Audltvr's Plat o} Ihm pan of the Nonnweyt puartar o} CROW RIVER Q 1 1 I ~ ~/ I SvUion I. 7wanyhlp 116. Range 30, 4yfnq South ay the Mill Pond. _ (~axrlp bon should except Sa~rn 16.50 feet of gold East IOb fvei of Lot 4.) N I ~ F ~~c I N -~ e R• ~t } eM>,.nv v 15 so e~ Hauae stole in lees Q ;p~ LOT 3 P~~ f ~ 2 ~~ ~~~ ~`~~- ~-{~`'v ~ . Beawlea Yen anenlnaena 1vuaW x~•~ Melwlw exingp .pea ebreabn foes loco aNr re el.roaaona enovn] of P~ Q~ ~~0 ~ 6 ~. \1~ c~~ ~ O EeNINq HeyN LOT 4 EablNp Ipufe Wye ° 11A H iaa ra.e ro ~ In tte i ~~~ _ ri. ~~ I ROPOgE i ~ n 4ARAGE ~ ar s g ~ >r ~ ren ,~ ]W ni f I I I / raa rs) a _- .-_ yeylh Me el Lel 1. MK PMr el ~-~ uM' Ike ea etr 1, Td le M, R30 •. a1Yq Muth el the Mir PeN LEWIS AVENUE PF>,1,1MEN IAND SURVEYIMM w el m. a Ina va Ler 4 ` BF/KMMAMx Tep nut e/ hYdem 91 Inlxeeellen vl LewH Avenue eaq Lereen 9rteea. ~levalbn - 106f;.11 MMTCHNL'WII 1W a Mleey urllly alaea able yur yei• Plen e neperl Y0. ~I efar.a er me er uq~er np' Clreet e upovle lan n rhea 1 ew a ee ay. neenue LeM BurveyaE unbr the lab e/ the 9aen al Ml nn bees. yargp WMUeef o.r.:' ~_ ca.. x..~y~9 .IpB /Id. Oeel~ BX P-~~ pp BB ~6.,., ----------~-.I rya I D~BRA'fZ ADDITI0~1 e I BLOCK I i 2 r I I ~C) I~ ~ ,le.i RICHARD RECE ~ CARSON QED su~~otrts ~Ne. OC7 2 ~ ~Gu4 840 gdamo sues, South ~nYOfH~tChNl5011 Nutchlneon. MN 55350 Oept. o/ P. Z. 8 B, S 2 tl) 6 8 7 5 5 S 5 1 tl U tl- y x 7-$ tl 4 1 ConiraCtor x2447 October 20, 2004 RE: Lee Stritesky 24' x 36' proposed garage To Whom It May Concern: This letter is written to answer any concerns in regards to the project listed above and any requirements that need to be met. The proposed building is not a pole shed with metal walls and roof. It is a wood frame garage with 9' sidewalls, 6/12 Pitoh roof and will have an exterior finished to compliment house using trim, windows, siding and overhead doors to match. The proposed garage would be more than 106' from Lewis Avenue. There presently are numerous trees and shrubs between street and proposed building site. If there are any questions, please contact me at 587-5555. Si rel~ Richard Larson, President Q ~c~ =~~~~~ ~- ---~-._ _ _ .,. _..-J ti _-. ,..~~..._.~. p~ayy -_... .. .-.. .____...-_. __...- ._ --._-__--.. Y _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ __~____ to 0 RECEryEb ocr 2 0 ~ooa ~~l' of Hyryy~~~ bgyl, el P. 2.6 ~ q ~~) r i i I I~ I I I ~~ _._ ~I tl H d M i -f ~, ~ ~~ ~i i a q ZG) -tea -r. 61...E Y.~Y!^~/ _~ i .~ .. w ~[ F ~ ~ ~ ~'+< <~ - / ,~_ ,~,~y ~ ~. %" l:rQ.l~r[l`r `i } 1 ~.N i}~rti a ~ "_ ~_ , } r ~ ~ _}~ t . q ra_i. ~,'..~ ~ ~ ~` ~~ y~+ ~~~~r rte ~. , ..~ s 3 , ,~"3 ~ - ~` ~ ..,fi a ~. ^ «... }Y 1r~~r, y _~ --~, ~~ era ~ ~ ~ ~:,~ .r_~ ~,~- "~„~`'yf'. ~ ~: -i~' .. . 'j~,s a '.a'- s ~/ ,~.. -'~ a~^ i ~~ (~ ~_ r a I f `1 y . .. ~. ~ r i~ ~ ~~~ w ~~, r ~ r~r II ..mot --,;,}.:~~ °~ ,,,4 .. >, - :..~ ~. ~ n . ~, ~t *~ a i ~ ~ S.~ x ''ti` .r7r.S , ~ + ~ ~U rtA. . ` ~ ,K- ~~ ~ ~ mss. ~ ~, r- .,;, :"~_r ~, ~ - a ., .~~~ ^x"~ i o `~ y /~ ; ~ ~~. "t . ~ ~"~ '~r:~" ~ ` ~ .. ~ ~~ ~~::~ ~ ,~ °~ 77~~ ~'R ~ "~ , - ? ~ .1y -,.. ... ____. .._._ -1- _ .......... a, x '~~ 1. J ~L w ~ ~+ `.., "' 4 via ry . ~ ~.~. ~~_ ... _ ~~ mm._.~........r~....._ _....:~ ~~___.... _ _..... _. ,~ _. ~~- ,~ ~~,~~~~ ~ ~~' ~ S ~ ~. {(jryF ~ 1 F ,~ ~. ~. J. „ #y~ ~'~. r~" r'^ s q~ ~ y}. {~k Y ~}~ t l i.. T"4 ~ ,, ~~7.HM A Z• h-~ ^~F z a l r~ ~ ;_ ,~ ~- ~_; ~ ~ ~- a t - ~ '"~ ~ ,-~-~tv ~~ '' ~~~ - y~,L. ~~ : r~. 1 ~' ` A r ~~ ~ ~~y. ~'~ F qtr ~~~ j,~~.' _ ~ ... tut ~~~s •~.. ~. ti y*r~ Il k ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ "~~ ~ _ ~r,_s ~~., . I~q py 4.~ 2 .~~ r ~ sj 4 r '~x ` cti ~ ~ ~ ~,~-0,. ~~ 7~' ~~ ~ e~~ * ~~~ T i''~ - ~ ,, _ ~ ~~ ~F Y ~.. . ~~~~ _ - , ~~ - ti . -. ,~ , ~ xz ~ YS~ ~ . N L 1 ~ J ~ '~ 9 x'~+? r ~f r ,~ j*~7 cs .r:.~ ~~ A~= L f,~ r ~ ...~_.. ~ AF. ~. a * ~ ~,~ r i. ~'.~~~ ~ `. f ~ 4"~ 1 ; ~ .'.r '~w ~' a n ~~ ~~ ~: '.~,. .. f 'F 'r~~'] ~,__ ~rC ti~ ,. ~ ~, ' .+ ~~~. , ~, ~,':.r . ~, i r ~ ;: '~~ a ,~'^' ~~-s ;: , ~ r~M ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ~t ~ , -~ +~ - ~ ~. .Y ~ N e _ n ~ ~ ~E ~ r o- r ~ - ` ~, ~` .. ~,~, +.r, ..~ ~ r~ ~ f A ,r.~ i ~; f, ~ ~ J ' + t4}~ ~ ~ ~ v ~' - T 't-_ 1 ~'A Y ~'S ,.. ~ , l~ r _T I N ~ w1r ~. r L, . t4" '.~~: r i •' q~ f* r _ r! ~~ ~~ 4 ' ~,~ ,~ ~ i' r ~ f 1' d f ~•A.i tr y {' 1./~~~` 1 r.r, 3. n ,. f,~- t s ~~ r ~. TO: Hutchinson City Council /~ /~ FROM: Marc A. Sebora, City Attorney / ~~'7 DATE: October 21, 2004 SUBJECT: 'T'ransient Merchant License Fees Council Members -• Once again we have had an issue arise in regard to the amount of money we charge for transient merchant license fees. As you recall, about a year ago we increased our fees from $25.00/day to $200.00/day and front $200.00/year to $500.00/year for transient merchants. This was done after consultation with the Hutchinson Chamber of Commerce who had complaints from its members that transient merchants either were not licensed or were not responsible in their selling practices or sold shoddy products. mce that change was made, I have had few comments or complaints about transient merchants not being icensed or complaints about products that were sold. Late this summer, we did receive an application from Homeir bistributing who wants to conduct a sale at the Hutchinson Armory on November 30 and December 1, 2004, and shortly after they were advised of the increased rate, I received the enclosed correspondence from attorney, Thomas W. Kirby. Although the letter and its attached cases may make for interesting reading, the bottom line is that the company has been contesting what they consider to be unreasonable transient merchant license fees as a violation of the United States Constitution's Commerce Clause. As you will note, in one of the cases Honuer Distributing was awarded $52,000 in attorney's fees. Homier Distributing has in the past commenced legal action against the City of Hibbing and threatened to do so with the City of Worthington and Nobles County. I have egntacted the League of Minnesota Cities to get their position on this matter and the other actions taken against Minnesota cities by Homier and their position is that transient merchant license Fees should be in a "reasonable amount" which in most cases is $100.00 or less. 1 have spoken with Attorney Kirby and he has agreed that a transient merchant license fee in the amount of $100.00/year would be acceptable to Homier Distributing. Therefore, in order to avoid the expense of litigation and the specter of an award of substantial attorney's fees to 13omicr, I would ask that the City Council entertain a motion to amend the City license and permit fee schedule to amend the Peddler/Solicitor/Transient Merchant Permit fee from $200.00/day and $500.00/year to $100.00/year only. ~hould you have questions concerning this, l would be happy to discuss it at the City Council meeting. 4ca) ~~~ ~ MEMORANDUM POLICE / EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO: Chief Hatters FROM: Officer Theresa Leider/Investigations DATE: 9/1 /04 RE: Transient Merchant License Background As of today's date, I have completed a background investigation on Charles Homier Jr. Mr. Homier has applied with the City Of Hutchinson for a Transient Merchant License. During the course of conducting this background investigation, I did not discover anything in the applicant's background that would disqualify him from obtaining this license. It should be noted that that Mr. Homier applied in August and December of 2002 for the same license, which Nr~s granted on both occasions. This background was an update to the previously conducted background investigati©ns. If you have any further question, or need any further investigation into this matter, please contact me. ~ce~ ~" ~F ~TC1ix~l~ ~ ~'~~ "` x "" pct ~~ ~ ~ r~~ ~a~~rrNt h~~~~~~ts ~ +~ a. .... a .... ~ s . o m ~ ....... p . w a . m .. Sid ~°e'd1~r°~ ~R, ~~;~' ..a...F~~. ~.~ wµMa~~M.,va.a~a>~~.~~~~ti.a4a ~", T SENT BY' CITY OF WUTCHIN&DN, 23d 42408 JUL-1B-02 iD:44AM; PAQE 9 DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS Ak0 DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED; AIL LE F N FIR UALITY TOOLS AND GENERAL MERCHANDI5E. DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY: CUSTOMERS WILL TAKE THE MERCHANDISE WITH THEM AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE Df SUPPLY - NAME ~ ADDRESS DF SUPPLIER: EKLY kjZ=R~H~ISE_ ~ DUR WARESHODSF.~A REp7 7,IiISHED idI'.E~1lIII]_IS Mgg[rFar.Trrupn nn~rFCmTrerry AND IN THE pRIENT PROVIDE TWO {2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS fDR CHARACTER REFERENCES: NAME 6 ADDRESS: NAME 6 ADDRESS: PHOHE NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: STATE LAST C1TY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY: CITY/STATE NAME: PARR ALLS WI PATE OF ACTIVITY: FROM: 7/24/~~_______-_` 70: ~~ -2- q (e~ SENT 9Y: CITY OF HUTCHINSON; 234 d240; JUG-19-02 10:44AM; PARE d I hereby cfrtlfy I have completely filled out the entire tbave applTca- tion and that the application is trua, correct, and accurate.* I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance t~b. 673 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex- ceeding 5540 yr 6y imprisonment fora period not exceeding 90 days ar both, plus, in either case, the costa of prosecution. 7/30/04 Signature of App cant Oate * Nn application will be forwardrd to the City Council unless recefveA one week prior to the regular Gvuncil meeting completely filled out xith required picture. OFFICE U5E POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION; r1 ~J -3- g(e) ~ CITY OF HUTCHINSON MEMO Finance Department October 22, 2004 TO: MAYDR fi CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: GENERATOR PURCHASE Plans to install generators for the Police/EOC and Recreation building have been discussed for several years, but the funding piece has been missing. Current estimates for the two installations are 5190,000. Earlier this year the City received 5239,678 from the State of Minnesota. This is the grant money received for construction of the Police and Fire Traina.ng Center. The grant was an end grant, meaning the reimbursement came after the expenditures were complete and most of which was spend in prior years. If left, the money would become part of the general fund balance at the end of the year. It would be proposed to use part of this grant money for the public safety purpose of the generator installation. We would ask council approval to use this money, to modify our budget and to prepare a bid package for installation of the generators. H:\~OC\City cDUnci2 memo l.dac ~I L I 9(~ ~ CITY OF HUTCHINS4N MEMO Finance Department October 22, 2004 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: YCEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: SCHEDULE INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS Our 2005 Budget review continues and if the Mayor & Council Members would approve the request would be to schedule information meeting for November 9 and November 23. The meetings would conclude the general fund review and move to enterprise budget and other fund budget. Current plans would be to update the council on the new water plant schedule and review schedules. H:\DOC\City council memo 9 inform mtq.daC ~J g~ ,: ~ CHANGE',(yRDER N;O} ~;''; `. C~TYQF.HUTCHINSON'; ENGINEERINGDEP 111 HASSAN ST SE; HUTCWINSON MN 55350 (6' CQNTRACTOR: Duinlnck Bros Inc Lettln No. 5 6th St, P O l3ax MN 56281-0208 Location: Rolling Meadows East ESCRIPTION OF GRANGE: 1) Change outlet structure In NW pond. Outlet was (stalled as staked and changed In the field later. 2) Drill new holes In Outlet apron ~ pond on Carolina Parkway. 3) Re-aet existing apron and close ]ointa for tie rode. Connect to existing catch basin for underdrains In bituminous alley. Dated: 10/15/2004 Item No. Sqec. Ref. Item Name Unlt Quantlt Unit Price Amount INCREASE ITEMS: 1 2 3 4 5 Outlet Structure Handwork Labor & Close Joints RCP Tie Rods Connect to Existin Catch Basin SUB-TOTAL P&O TOTALINGREASEITEMS: EACH 3 $150.00 $450.00 HOUR 5 $45.00 $202.50 EACH 0.5 $150.00 $75.00 EACH 4 $18.00 $72.00 EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 $999.50 PERCENT 15% $149.93 $1,149.43 -- IET INCREASE ----------..-______....____...--------"--------_....r____~..r__----......_ 1,14 . i accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount of $ ,149.43 (add~deducs~ An extension of -D- days shall 6e allowed for completion. The original completion date shall ict be changed. ;ORIGINAL CONTRACT ~ ~ PREVIOUS . ° ~ THIS ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ "'"~ - ; ~ ~~, ,Tt7TA1;`•, ' AMOUNT ADDITIONS/DEOUCTIONS AU<aITION/D6DYC~IAN,'~' .'., '. ;,, ;'';! $$53,369.03 ,~~ ~ ~ ~ $2,903.18 ~ ~ ~ $1,149.0.3' ~ ^~~ ~$65~,4P1.84'~''• ~~ Contractor Director of Engineering TED: Mayor DATED: ~~~ APPROVED: GATED: City Administrator 1D~~~ C C~ Hutchinson Cit Center 111 Hassan Street sc Hutchinson, MN 55J50.2522 320-5R7-5151lFax 320.234-41A0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIJ~ FROM: GARY PLOTZ SUBJEC'T': CANVASS OF CITY ELECTION State Statute 205.185 subd. 3 states the requirements for canvass of the City's General Election. As stated, the canvass by the City of Hutchinson must take place within seven days following the election. . Please set a special meeting of the Hutchinson City Council to canvass the November 2, 2004, City Election. Thank you. Printed on recycled P°r'~r- IU~,~ C~ R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON B Check Number AP Pa ment Re Ister with Voids Check Date 10120/2004 - Ck Date T e Check # Vendor Name Amount ' 10/20/2004 PK 125679 ' 101876 AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. 860A0 10/20/2004 PK 125680 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 128.82 10/20/2004 PK 125681 120687 ARMORY FUND 305.25 10/20/2004 PK 125882 110099 CARVER COUNTY COURT APMIN 200.00 10/20/2004 PK 125683 103333 DNR WATE=RS 75.00 10/20/2004 PK 125884 107875 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. 300.00 1D/2D/2004 PK 125885 101672 I'1.R.L.A.P.R. 288.87 10/20/2004 PK 125686 102633 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 5,990.84 10/20/2004 PK 125667 102635 HUTCMINSON, CITY OF 546.54 10/20/2004 PK 125688 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 3,783.84 10/20/2004 PK 125889 114712 LAFARGE ROAD MARKING 1,053.06 10120!2004 PK 125690 102573 MCLEDD COOP POWER 978.88 10!20/2004 PK 125691 102469 MCLI=PD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 380.00 1 012 0/2 0 04 PK 125682 119345 MINNESOTA CHAMBER BUSINESS SER 1,059.96 10/20/2004 PK 125893 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 723.87 10/20/2004 PK 125894 102919 MMBA 15.00 10/20/2004 PK 125895 102490 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 898.73 10/20/2004 PK 125898 102098 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00 10/20/2004 PK 125597 102052 QUALITY W INE & SPIRITS CO. 3,851.20 10/20/2004 PK 125698 102441 U S BANK 600,767.76 10/20/2004 PK 125699 102840 WM MUELLER & SONS 25,865.03 70/20/2004 PK 125700 102640 WM MUELLER & SDNS 108,388.11 10!20/2004 PK 125701 120624 ZOOK, LORI 20.00 754,264.34 Account Nu 754,264.34 rMMEDIATE PAYS JDid Amou ~~ L~ ~~ 10/26/2004 PK 125854 102445 POSTMASTER 145.00 10/28/2004 PK 125855 102493 PREMIER TECH PACKAGING 849-51 10/26/2004 PK 125856 102699 PRIEVE LANDSCAPING 191.70 10!26/2004 PK 125857 102590 QUADS ELECTRIC 180-90 10/26/2004 PK 125858 108061 QUADE'S INC 316.20 10/28/2004 PK 125859 102052 QUALITY W INS & SPIRITS CO. 12,395.84 10!28/2004 PK 125880 702804 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 133.23 10/26/2004 PK 125861 120705 R.J.L. TRANSFER 24.80 1 0/2 6120 0 4 PK 125862 120714 RAINY WATER CONDITIONING 702.77 10/28/2004 PK 125883 714718 RBSCOT7 EOUIPMENT 6,518.25 10!26/2004 PK 125864 103832 RCH INC 14,278.84 10/26/2004 PK ~ 125865 102384 RDO EQUIPMENT 1,588.04 10/26/2004 PK 125888 114011 REINER, LORETTA 29•~ 10/26/2004 PK 125887 103830 RELIABLE 108-07 10/28!2004 PK 125880 102358 RIDGEWATERCOLLEGE 703.00 10/28/2004 PK 125869 108702 RIVER CITY PACKAGING INC 8,726.00 10/26/2004 PK 125870 104149 RIVER VALLEY TRUCK CENTERS 3,741.58 10/26/2004 PK 125871 120712 ROBERT MCCARTHY 8 CITY OF HUTC 1,479.99 70126/2004 PK 125872 120713 ROSER7 MCCARTHY & TIeBITS ENG 1,200-00 10/28/2004 PK 125073 105850 ROSINSON APPRAISAL CO INC 2,000.00 1 0/2 812 0 0 4 PK 125874 719208 RUNKE, DOREEN 2~•~ 10/28!2004 PK 125875 702225 RUNNING'S SUPPLY 121.91 10/28/2004 PK 125876 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 1~' •~ 10/26/2004 PK 725877 102101 SeC PAGING 28.88 1 0/2 812 0 0 4 PK 125878 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 1,182.44 10/28/2004 PK 125879 120700 SCHOOL DIST 11423 3,241.86 10/26/2004 PK 725880 109801 SCOTT'S WINDOWS 42.60 10126!2004 PK 725887 101892 SEH ~•3~•~ 70/26/2004 PK 125882 120898 3EMON, KAITLVN 2D-00 10/28/2004 PK 125863 120704 SHERWYN SPIERING 225.00 10!2612004 PK 125604 102809 SHOPKO 48.37 10/28/2004 PK 125885 720410 SPEGIALTY WINES 614.00 10!28/2004 10/26/2004 PK PK 125888 125887 102242 102872 SRF CONSULTING GROUP STANDARD PRINTING 1,350.73 175-73 10!28/2004 PK 125888 102584 STAR TRIBUNE 27-95 1 012 8/2 0 0 4 10/28/2004 PK PK 126809 125090 110990 702674 STARKE, MELISSA STATE TREASURER 48.00 5,296.14 10/28/2004 PK 125891 105091 STEARNS COUNTY COURT ADMINIST 900.00 10/28/2004 PK 125892 119799 STEVE'S OK SERVICES 2,416.00 10!26/2004 10/28/2004 PK PK 126893 125094 118469 105681 STONE LAKE CLOSING CO STORAGE CENTER 7.04 68.00 1012&2004 PK 125896 110862 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT 143.28 1 0/26!2004 PK 125898 103094 SUBWAY 37.39 10/26/2004 PK 125897 102659 TEK MECHANICAL 3,817.25 10/26/2004 PK 125080 103587 THODE, MATT 200.00 10/28/2004 PK 125099 120707 THUL, ANDY 40.00 70/26/2004 PK 725900 102820 TRI CO WATER 8.36 10!28/2004 10/26/2004 PK PK 125901 125902 102619 102824 TWD WAY COMM INC UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 646.53 48-99 10/28!2004 PK 125903 719913 USFILTER DAMS PRODUCTS 7,465.65 1 012 6/2 0 0 4 PK 125904 102419 VALLEY SALES OF HUTCHINSON 248-51 10/26/2004 PK 125905 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 419.80 ~~ ~~ 10/26/2004 PK 72575D 120882 ERICKSDN-SCHNEIDER, KELLY 170AD 10/26!2004 PK 125751 104871 ESS BROTHERS & SONS 354.65 10126/2004 PK 125752 120623 FERNHDLZ,DICK 40•~ 10!26/2004 PK 125753 120701 FOSS-BURRY, KELLI 180-~ 10/28/2004 PK 125754 102963 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE 1,256.52 10/28/2004 PK 125755 ip5021 GENERALTRADINDCO 136.82 10!2612004 PK 125756 120884 GONZALEZ•CROCKETT, ADRIANA 200.00 10/28/2004 PK 125757 701883 GRAHAM, MARION 576.44 70/28/2004 PK 125758 105562 GRANIT BRONZ 118.32 70/26/2D04 PK 125759 113200 QREAT NPRTHERN BARK COMPANY, I 9,428-W 10126!2004 PK 125780 101874 pRIGGS & COOPER & CO 26,699.00 10/26/2004 PK 125781 120605 GROCHOW-HARpY, COLLETTE 20D.00 10/28/2004 PK 125782 120698 HAARSTAD, SCOTT ~•~ 10/26/2004 PK 126763 102528 HAGERJEWELRY INC. 27•~ 10/28/2D04 PK 125784 102730 HALI•BRITE INC 527.18 10/28/2004 PK 125765 1 D2451 HANSEN GIST DF SLEEPY EYE 3,508.80 10/26/2004 PK 125768 7D208B HANSEN QRAVEL 1,827.07 10/28/2004 PK 125767 107958 HANSEN & VASEK CONSTRUCTION 5,945.00 7D/2B/2004 PK 725768 120237 HATTEN,DANIEL 75-~ 10/26/2004 PK 125769 120710 HAUGEN•TODD, BETH 200.00 10/26/2004 PK 125770 101988 HED, MARILYN 478-18 1 0/2 8120 0 4 PK 125771 7D3059 HEMMAH, LLOYD ~•~ 10/28/2004 PK 125772 704363 HENKE, MARY 186.00 70N26/2D04 PK 725773 120898 HENNEPIN7ECHNICALCOLLEGE 1,181.30 10/26/2004 PK 125774 102701 HENRY & ASSOCIATES `~•7B 10/28/2004 PK 125775 102531 HENRYS FOODS INC 776.12 10/2&2004 PK 126776 1D1915 HERMEL WHOLESALE 2'•48 10/28/2004 PK 726777 118866 HEWLETT-PACKARD CO 1,419.65 1 012 6/2 0 0 PK 125778 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CARFJHUTCHINSPN 558-63 10/26/2004 PK 725779 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 78.92 10/26/20D4 PK 12578D 102530 HUTCHINSDN CO-0P 125-73 70/26/2DD4 PK 125781 101958 HUTCHINSDN FIRE DEPT RELIEF AS 7,290.OD 10/28/2004 PK 125762 710027 HUTCHINSDN HEALTH & FITNESS 126.00 10128/2004 PK 125763 102540 HUTCHINSDN PLUMBING K HEATIN4 599.34 10/28/2004 PK 725784 102547 HUTCHINSDN TELEPHONE CO 1,139.95 10/26I20D4 pK 125785 102543 HUTCHINSDN WHOLESALE 1,24520 1 012 6/2 0 0 4 PK 125788 102038 HUTCHINSDN, CfTY DF 39,790.00 10/26/2004 PK 125767 102038 HUTCHINSDN, CITY OF 608.00 1 0/2 6120 04 PK 125788 102038 HUTCHINSDN, CITY OF 763,000.00 10/28/2004 PK 125789 102072 HUTGHINSON, CITY OF 26.284.00 1 0/2 812 0 0 4 PK 125790 103099 HUTCHINSDN, CITY OF 2,012.83 10/28/2004 PK 125791 103061 INFRA7ECH ~7•~ 70/26/2D04 PK 725792 103520 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 39024 10/28l20D4 PK 125793 702062 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 126.70 10/28/2006 PK 125794 111836 JACOBSEN, SEPTEMBER 9044 10/26/2004 PK 125795 115855 JEFF MEEHAN SALES INC. ~•~ 10/2&20D 4 PK 125796 702208 JEFFS ELECTRIC 572.27 10/26!200 4 PK 125797 120895 JENSEN, BRIAN 6~•~ 10!281200 4 PK 125798 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 8.29 10/28/200 4 PK 725799 10285 2 JERRYSTRANSMISSION 2,321.81 10/26/200 4 PK 125800 120671 JOHN BAHR'S SKIDSTEER SERVICE 960.00 1 D/26/200 4 PK 725807 10484 3 JOHN CHRISTOPHER MADOLE ASSOC 4,638.29 C. .. L J ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS 10/26/04 WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE-USE TAX GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE-SALES TAX H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE-FUEL TAX LIQUOR IvIN DEPT OF REVENUE-AUG SALES TX 8610.00 489.00 983.80 27520.00 1 M •# R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON y Check Number W AP Payment Register with Voids Check Date _ 10/14/2D04 ~ - _ _ k Date ~~" ~~ Type Check # Vendor Name Amount ~ 10/14/2004 PK 125672 "~ ~ 103136 BEST W ESTERN MAPLEWOOD INN 240.00 10/14/2004 _ PK 125673 12D667 CACKA ROOFING & CDNSTRUCTION 4,581.00 10%14%20D4 PK 125674 120665 DRAGT, DEL .~_. 13D.00 ~ _ 10/14/2004 PK - 125675 _ _ 115652 HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER 73.12 10/14/2004 PK 125676 104106 RAMADA PLAZA HOTEL 150.69 10%14%2004 PK 125677 120666 SKOOG-HASTING, TONYA 180.00 10/14/2004 ~PK 125678 104977 STOCKMAN, JACKIE ~~ 63.00 __ ~~ ~~ ~~ 5,417.81 Account N # -' 5,417.81 i C~