cp12-10-85 c1 -IUTCH INS ON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
U(�(•(_,mh� e_.r_8 'TO December 14
4985
'`IEDNESDAY
-1.1-
Directors Meeting
At City Hall
SUNDAY
-8-
FIRST DAY OF
HANUKKAH
MONDAY
-9-
THURSDAY
-12-
I
TU DAY.
-10-
7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at
City Hall
•
0-
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1985
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Reverend Thor Skeie
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 26, 1985 and
Special Meeting o-f—ffo-vember 18, 1985
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Building Official's Report - November 1985
2. Library Board Minutes dated November 26, 1985
Action - Order report and minutes to be filed
(b) Consideration Of Applications For Snow Removal Permits:
1. David Blake
2. Dick Ewert
3. Cletus Huhn
4. Kerry Krueger
5. Larry McDonald
6. Randy Peterson
7. Rodney Rauch
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue permits
5. Public Hearin - 8:00 P.M.
(a) Consideration Of Intoxicating Liquor License For Dennis Hanson, Owner
Of Velvet Coach
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to
approve and issue license
(b) Consideration Of Private Or Public Financing Of Police Station
Action - Motion to close hearing
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 10, 1985
(c) Consideration Of Kimberly Country Estates Improvement Project No. 86 -05 0
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
project and order preparation of plans and specifications - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Consideration of Status Reports by City Attorney:
1. Klockmann Property
2. Gutormson Property
Action -
(b) Consideration Of Request For Building Official To Attend Annual
Institute For Building Officials January 15 -17, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
(c) Considertion Of Request By Director Of Engineering To Combine Holiday,
Vacation Time And Old Earned Compensatory Time
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
(d) Update Report On Luce Line State Trail By Bob Kaul Of DNR
Action -
(e) Consideration Of Request By Frank Fay For Reimbursement Of IRB Deposit
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve reimbursement
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Ordinance No. 19/85 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 464
Concerning Zoning Regulations In The City Of Hutchinson And The
Official Zoning Map (Larry Wendorff)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(b) Ordinance No. 20/85 - Industrial Wastewater Pretreatment Ordinance For
The City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(c) Ordinance No. 21/85 - Ordinance Amending Subdivision Ordinance No. 466
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
0-"
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 10, 1985
0 (d) Resolution No. 8168 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(e) Resolution No. 8169 - Transferring $45,000 From Liquor Store To General
Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
None
9. New Business
(a) Consideration Of Ordering Preparation Of Engineer's Report On
- Northwoods Avenue- Improvement (Hillcrest Addition)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve ordering report and waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 8164
(b) Consideration Of Annual Wage Adjustments
Action -
It (c) Consideration Of Recommended Fee Schedule For New Recreation Center
r
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve fee schedule
(d) Consideration Of Postage Machine And Postage Scale Lease
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration Of Equipment Purchases For New Recreation Building
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve purchases
(f) Consideration Of Voluntary Assessment For Special Lea6ue Of Minnesota
Cities /NAHRO Tax Increment Finance Study And Lobbying Effort
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve assessment
(g) Consideration Of Plans And Specifications And Advertisement For Bids On
1986 Improvement Projects No. 86 -01, No. 86 -02 And No. 86 -03
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifications
and open bids January 21, 1986 at 2:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings
and adopt Resolutions No. 8165, No. 8166 and No. 8167
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 10, 1985
(h) Review Of Super Valu Building Expansion For Building Permit
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve permit
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
4
i
40,
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 1985
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Stearns at 7 :30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Mar-
lin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Miku 1 ecky, and Mayor Robert H. Stearns. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Director of Engineering Mar-
low V. Priebe.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Manley Swarthout.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of November 12, 1985 were approved as
amended and the minutes of the special meeting of November 18, 1985 wi1T be
reissued at the next meeting.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS -
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - OCTOBER 1985
�r
(b) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES PERMITS:
1. LEONARD RIEMANN
2. TERRY WALTERS
Alde,rman Carls moved to approve the applications and issue the permits.
Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR SNOW REMOVAL PERMITS:
1. MARK BETKER - BETKER BUILDERS
2. DELBERT CROTTEAU
3. RON HANSEN
4. MILT HANSON
5. EDWIN KARG
6. HAROLD MOLLS
7. DOUGLAS PETERSON
8. MARK SHOUTZ
9. DALE STURGES
10. STEVE STURGES
11. OTTO TEMPLIN - ERICKSON & TEMPLIN CONST.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
1
2. PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES DATED OCTOBER
15, 1985
Mayor Stearns
ordered the report and minutes
to be filed.
�r
(b) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES PERMITS:
1. LEONARD RIEMANN
2. TERRY WALTERS
Alde,rman Carls moved to approve the applications and issue the permits.
Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR SNOW REMOVAL PERMITS:
1. MARK BETKER - BETKER BUILDERS
2. DELBERT CROTTEAU
3. RON HANSEN
4. MILT HANSON
5. EDWIN KARG
6. HAROLD MOLLS
7. DOUGLAS PETERSON
8. MARK SHOUTZ
9. DALE STURGES
10. STEVE STURGES
11. OTTO TEMPLIN - ERICKSON & TEMPLIN CONST.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
to approve the applications and issue the permits. Motion carried
unanimously.
5.- PUBLIC HEARING -.8:00 P.M.
(a) ADOPTION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT ORDINANCE
Mayor Stearns called the public hearing to order at 8:00 P.M.
Mr. Jim Hagley of CED /Donohue & Associates, Inc. gave a brief intro-
duction of the purpose of the program and highlighted the key points of
Ordinance No. 20/85. He stated it was a requirement of the E.P.A. to
regulate the discharge of industries. Therefore, the local industries,
M.P.C.A., the City of Hutchinson and CED had worked together to reach
an agreement on the proposed ordinance.
Mayor Stearns stated the copper limit should be changed as soon as pos-
sible. Discussion was given to the high level of copper in the City's
water. There was no known solution to the matter in question.
Mr. Wayne Fortun, President of Hutchinson Technology, commented on the
low flow of the river and how it was affected by metals. There was an
excess of four pounds of copper per day and two pounds per day from in-
dustry. He remarked that by working with the two consultants, the dif-
ferent industries and St. Paul 3M, the City, and M.P.C.A., they were
able to reach where they are today. The limitations set by M.P.C.A.
could limit H.T.I. to two shifts and no growth. The industry will have
to watch the copper concentration and reduce it.
Mr. Hagley recommended that at some point after the program begins, the
City should determine a permit fee for industries, typically $500.
Mr. Dick Desens, President of Ty's Metal, commented that the pretreat-
ment program represented a lot of work by those involved. Everyone had
done their best to put together an ordinance environmentally sound that
was workable. It represented a cooperative effort by the City and in-
dustries, which was what made Hutchinson the city it was by working to-
gether.
Mr. Jack Yates, Hutchinson Technology, commented on the copper limita-
tion and how it could affect the City. He pointed out that if the cop-
per limit was not raised, H.T.I. may be Beverly limited.
It was moved by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson, to
close the hearing at 8:27 P.M. Motion carried unanimously.
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the pretreatment program and to waive
first reading of Ordinance No. 20/85 and set second reading for Decem-
ber 10, 1985. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously car-
ried.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD FOR RELEASE OF SENIOR
CENTER FUND RAISING MONEY
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson approved the release of funds.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF STATUS REPORTS BY CITY ATTORNEY:
1. KLOCKMAN PROPERTY
2. GUTORMSON PROPERTY
In the absence of the City Attorney, this item was deferred to the next
Council meeting.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND ADVANCED
WORKSHOP IN CITY AUDITS DECEMBER 3, 1985
Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the request. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgeson and carried unanimously.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 17/85 - ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING SALE OF MUNICIPALLY OWNED
REAL PROPERTY
Alderman Mikulecky commented that the sale of property was made before
the ordinance allowed the sale. The warranty deed was filed with the
County on November 7, 1985 and signed on November 1, 1985 by the Mayor.
Mayor Stearns replied that the City Attorney had approved the legal
procedure, and he felt everything was in proper order.
Alderman Mlinar moved to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance
No. 725. The motion was seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried
four to zero, with Alderman Mikulecky abstaining from voting.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 8158 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8158. Motion unanimously
carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTING CITY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 12, 1985)
1. BARBARA (MRS. CLYDE) PETERSON
2. FRANK MOTT
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
3. BILL EVERETT
4. MARK SCHNOBRICH
5. JERRY NOTCH
6. ED E. HOMAN
7. BOB STEARNS
8. MARLOW PRIEBE - EX- OFFICIO
Alderman Torgerson moved to ratify the appointments and to waive read-
ing and adopt Resolution No. 8161. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to authorize discontinuation
of service unless other arrangements had been made. Motion seconded by
Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF JOB TITLE CHANGE FOR NANCY BUSS
It was moved by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson, to ap-
prove the title change for Nancy Buss. Motion carried unanimously.
L�
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING REQUEST SUBMITTED BY LARRY WENDORFF WITH
FAVORAQBLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION 0
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to waive the first reading
of Ordinance No. 19/85 and set the second reading December 10, 1985,
approving the rezoning. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and car-
ried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST SUBMITTED BY PURE
CULTURE PRODUCTS WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
After discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the permit and to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8159. Alderman Carls seconded
the motion and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT SUBMITTED BY TY HELLAND
(HELLAND'S SEVENTH ADDITION) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
City Administrator Plotz recommended referring this item back to the
Planning Commission until the requirements had been met.
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to refer the plat back
to the Planning Commission. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and
carried unanimously.
•
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
(f) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 466 WITH
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to waive first reading
of Ordinance No. 21/85 and set second reading December 10, 1985. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Carls. Alderman Torgerson amended his mo-
tion to include the corrections in Sections 5.30, 5.47, and 5.96.
Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
The main motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464, SECTION 6.09
FEES WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
City Administrator Plotz explained the reason for the proposed amend-
ment to Zoning Ordinance No. 464, Section 6.09 Fees, which would remove
the fee schedule from the zoning ordinance and allow the City Council
to change the fees by resolution rather than by amending the ordinance.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the amendment and to waive first
reading of Ordinance No. 18/85 and set second reading December 10,
1985. The motion failed for lack of a second.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved that the City Administrator
research and review the possibility of having all fees set by ordi-
nance. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and carried three to two
with Aldermen Carts, Mlinar and Mikulecky voting aye and Alderman Tor-
gerson and Mayor Stearns voting nay.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF REPLACING 1977 CHEVROLET VAN FOR ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
After discussion, Alderman Mikulecky made the motion to obtain esti-
mates on new vans and used vans comparably equipped and to report back
at the next Council meeting for comparison. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING PERSONNEL POLICY TO INCORPORATE FEDERAL FAIR
LABOR STANDARDS ACT
Personnel Coordinator Sitz reported on the Federal Fair Labor Standards
Act and its affect on the City personnel policy regarding compensatory
time.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the amendment of
the personnel policy and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8157. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PRIVATE OR PUBLIC
FINANCING OF POLICE STATION
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
City Administrator Plotz commented the public hearing would be a fol-
low up to the special meeting held with the Police Station Building
Committee on November 18, 1985. The intent was to obtain public input.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and set a public hearing on December 10, 1985 at 8:00 P.M.
Motion unanimously carried.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE BY DENNIS
HANSON FOR VELVET COACH
Alderman Mlinar moved to set a public hearing on December 10, 1985 at
8 :00 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF NAMING CHARLES BAILLY & COMPANY AUDITORS FOR 1985
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the auditors for 1985. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF HP -150 COMPUTER AND PRINTER
FOR TRANSIT DEPARTMENT WITH MATCHING FUNDS FROM MN /DOT
It was reported the Minnesota Department of Transportation would give
the City $2,000 toward the purchase of a micro - computer for the Transit
Department, with the City's matching cost to be approximately $1,600.
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve the pur-
chase computer P
chase and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8160. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF PLAZA 15 SHOPPING CENTER EXPANSION PROPOSALS
Director of Engineering Priebe reported on his recent meeting with
MN /DOT regarding the proposed expansion of Super Valu to a Cub Foods
Store at Plaza 15. It has been scheduled for MN /DOT to meet-With Super
Valu and Kraus - Anderson representatives on November 27; therefore,
additional information will be forthcoming.
(o) REPORT BY CITY ENGINEER ON MN /DOT PROJECTS
Engineer Priebe reported MN /DOT had requested a new letting date of
June 279 1986 for the T.H. 7/22 West project. Therefore, the City
should hold a hearing in the near future to assess properties bene-
fited by the improvement and not previously assessed for street improve-
ment.
MN /DOT would like to utilize the service road along T.H. 7/22 for a by-
pass during construction to eliminate detouring traffic to Litchfield.
The by -pass would require construction of the service road west of
School Road.
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
It was reported that MN /DOT would not have time to design a yellow
• flashing light system at School Road as requested by the Council due to
the proposed construction schedule and limited manpower. However, the
City could take steps to have the design for the flashing light pre-
pared by a professional engineer. All costs of the preparation of the
plans and contract for installation would be paid by the City.
There are proposed plans to design a left turn, through traffic and
right turn lane designation for both north and south bound traffic at
Washington Avenue and Second Avenue South.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR RAILROAD
CONNECTOR TRACK AND SPUR TRACK
City Administrator Plotz suggested that inasmuch as the Director of
Engineering did not have the expertise to prepare specifications for
the railroad connector track and spur track, the Council consider Ber-
nie Prusak of Gopher Engineering. Mr. Prusak had submitted an estimate
of $35 per hour, plus travel and typing expenses, or an- estimated total
cost of $2,200 to develop the specifications. This cost would come out
of the tax increment financing fund. Mr. Plotz reported the City At-
torney had received an opinion from the State Attorney General's office
that the railroad project would have to be bid off specifications.
Following discussion, Alderman Carl moved to approve the preparation
of specifications by Bernie Prusak and to waive reading and adopt Reso-
lution No. 8163. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
(q) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER INTO NEGOTIATIONS WITH
SURROUNDING TOWNSHIPS FOR JOINT ORDERLY ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded
by Alderman Mikulecky, to approve entering into negotiations. Motion
carried unanimously.
(r) CONSIDERATION OF ACCOUNT FOR STATE SURCHARGE REFUND
City Administrator Plotz stated that he and the Finance Director were
opposed to a separate fund since the City budget already provided for
conferences and other items in the building department.
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to reject the account. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reminded the City Council of the special meet-
ing scheduled for December 5, 1985 in the fire station conference room.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
The City Policy Procedures Handbook will be reviewed at that time.
Also, discussion will be given to the annual wage adjustment and merit
raise.
Mr. Plotz stated he had two inquiries from Council members regarding
the memorandum addressed to the City Engineer concerning his vacation
plans for winter 1986. Engineer Priebe reported he had not been able
to respond in writing due to meetings, but his vacation plans were to
be gone December 22, 1985 to January 20, 1986, using both earned com-
pensatory time and vacation time. Following his anniversary date, he
would be taking four weeks of vacation in March. The City Council re-
quested Engineer Priebe to present his request in writing for the next
Council meeting.
It was reported that Change Order No. 3 for the recreation facility, in
the amount of $644.68, needed Council approval. The change order would
provide additional insulation to reduce possible condensation on the
interior wall and revise the location of exterior lights. Also, the
contractor requested a 30 -day extension due to weather conditions and
other delays. It was reported the Recreation Department planned to
move into the new facilities in December and have activities in the
building by December 20.
Alderman Mlinar moved to authorize the Change Order No. 3. Motion
seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CARLS
Alderman Carls commented on the recent article in The Hutchinson Lead-
er regarding water meters. Discussion of the problem of accurate
meter readings followed.
An inquiry was made about the barking dog ordinance, but no answer was
available.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar reported that William Janousek was having a problem
with people cutting across his property, and he wondered what could be
done. Mr. Janousek had been told he could not put up a fence. City
Administrator Plotz responded that he thought Mr. Janousek had been
given some alternatives from the Building Official.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson stated John Korngiebel had contacted him to report
the heat exchanger in the fire station would be replaced.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Priebe requested Council approval of Resolution No. 8162 to
T
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 26, 1985
disperse payment under two lettings and to correct the City records for
work done in Kimberly Country Estates. Since a change order was more
than 25 percent of the letting for the project, the City Attorney had
determined this action necessary to meet the requirements of the law.
Alderman Mlinar moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8162.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
The City Engineer presented an update on the railroad work and reported
the contractor was working in the low area of the elevator where the
trackage will be laid. Excess water was being pumped out.
A meeting was held with Ralph Neumann, Dick Nagy, and Skip Quade re-
garding the meter problem at the wildlife sanctuary. The City had been
given an inaccurate, low estimate of water usage. The potential water
use would be approximately $21,000 a year. Other possible sources for
water would be a deep well or a horizontal well. The use of river
water had been ruled out. An update report will be presented at the
next Council meeting.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
approve the claims and authorize payment from the appropriate funds.
• Motion unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
r
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:38 P.M.
U
•
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1985
Mayor Stearns called the special joint meeting of City Council and Police Sta-
tion Building Committee to order at 5:00 P.M. in the fire station conference
room. Present were: Mayor Robert H. Stearns, Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John
M 1 i nar, A l derman Pat M i ku 1 ecky, A l derman Mar t i n Torgerson, Mayor -E 1 ect Pau 1 Ack-
land, City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill,
City Attorney James Schaefer, Police Chief Dean O'Borksy, Officer Chuck Jones,
Sgt. John Gregor, Chairman Chad Piehl, Dick Burgart, Pat Durfee, Norm Tulman,
Phyllis Hegrenes, and Secretary Nancy Buss.-
City Attorney Jim Schaefer gave a presentation regarding advisory elections. He
recommended that such a referendum was inappropriate for our city since it is
non - binding. There is no statutory requirement to do so, and it is not required
by the City Charter. Attorney Schaefer also advised that the private financing
is legal and the letters of reference are included in the City Council packet.
Chairman Chad Piehl presented the building committee's recommendation and pro-
posal regarding financing. The committee members unanimously felt that private
financing should be used to build the police facility. They felt that a bond
issue would fail.
There was a question and answer period regarding both private and public fi-
nancing. Alderman Mike Carls felt that if the police station was financed pri-
vately, he was not sure but that the city would have to cut personnel to make
the annual payment. Finance Director Merrill and Administrator Plotz said that
phasing in the annual payment is acceptable, with the understanding that it will
restrain the budget in future years.
Mayor Stearns and Alderman Torgerson indicated they were in favor of private fi-
nancing, Aldermen Carls and Mlinar were undecided, and Alderman Mikulecky was
against it. Aldermen Mlinar and Carls requested a public hearing. After agree-
ing to a December 10 public hearing date, the meeting was closed at 8:15 P.M.
h
Ll
of
26 Permits - $3,374,948.00 Total Valuation PLEASE CONTINUE ON REVMW stn[ —sm.
1
1
i
1
�1
i
I
i
I
j
1
i
s
i
I
i
si' Bean
pe is It a
I Nor 5
PLEASE MAIL ON OR BEFORE THE 4TH DAY OF THE MONTH
":a vawTratr S eowrawca
uwawu or r►he eawwe
(PNase -moor any errors in now or aaaess
REPORT OF BUILDING OR ZONING
PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL
PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION
*0103500 41 9 9909 065 8 11
26 0 2730
CENSUS use ONLY
-
NONER PITTNAN BLDG OFF
CITY NALL 37 WASHINGTON AVE WEST
NYTCNINSON NN 55350
Has e 8eogroplde revere" a prwit
ti shelved this porled?
® No [3 Yes - Eap4oin in casements
If me permits were Issued during this
MAIL THINeffersonville, vrear of the Censys
lease red thelnstructions before
Ceried, enter (X) is box end raters
i0"m ❑
COPY TO .A132
f(301) For help,
Ind.
all collect
Section 1 - NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSE.
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
KEEPING BUILDINGS AND
Item
Number
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
- MOBILE HOMES -
(onuai►trana/
f aa„i°a'1'
udcnps
ouuntbing
Bulldl
N01'�s
(al
lbl
IC)
(d)
Is)
l )
One - family houses, detached
101
3
3
248,286
One- family houses attached, each unit
'
separated from adjoining units) by a
-
wall That extends from ground to roof
102
Two - family buildings
103
Three- and four - family buildings
104
Five -or -more family buildings
105
1
35
1,797,507
TOTAL (Sutra of 101 -105)
109
4
38
2,045,793
Mobile homes
112
7
1 7
- -- - - - - --
Section 11 - NEW RESIDENTIAL NON-
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
No
Number
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
HOUSEKEEPING
BUILDINGS
ildinps Rooms
construction
(Omit cents)
Construction
(Omit cents)
uildin s
g
Rooms
Is)
(b) (c)
(d)
le)
If)
( )
Hotels, motels, and tourist cabins
Intended for transient accommodations
213
1
53
1.2 5 775
Other nonhousekeeping shelter
214
SeeNon III - NEW NONRESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
BUILDINGS
Nom
N
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
Buildings
�(b)
construction
(Omit cants)
tiulldin
Bus ^g
units
construction
(Omit is)
(a)
(d)
lei
l0
lg
Amusement and recreational buildings
318
Churches and other religious buildings
319
Industrial buildings
320
Parkin garages (open to general public)
321
Service stations and repair arm es
322
Hospitals and other institutional buildings
23
;;'.'.':•
Office, bank, and professional buildings
324
`+
Public works and utilities buildings
325
-.hi
xt•
Schools and other educational buildings
326
Stores and other mercantile buildings
327
^+
Other nonresidential buildings
328
2
.,
1,400
Structures other then buildings
Section IV - ADDITIONS AND
ALTERATIONS
°E r An increase in the number of housing
w= units (in the housing units column,
E enter only the number of additional
:. units)
433
bNo
change In the number of
w
housing units
434
11
64,985
A decrease in the number of housing
v
units (In the housing units column,
o eenter
only the number of decreased
units)
435
Residential garages and carports
(attached and detached)
436
;r�C
All other buildings and structures
37
1 1
46,995
26 Permits - $3,374,948.00 Total Valuation PLEASE CONTINUE ON REVMW stn[ —sm.
1
1
i
1
�1
i
I
i
I
j
1
i
s
i
I
i
Sectlea V — CONVERSIONS
PRWATZLY OWNED PUBLICLY engo
Nrmeb•r
Vaieetian of Number
value im N
the
N o.
ldlNa
N
f 4
(omf omit)
(omit asaw
(a)
(c)
(d) ( (f)
(g)
Nonresidential and nonhousekeepint
buildings to housekeeping buildings
SIO
Housekeeping buildings to nonresidential
and nonhousekeeping buildings
S41
Seetiss VI — DEMOLITIONS AND
RAZING OF BUILDINGS
One - family buildings attached
and detached
645
Two - family buildings
6461
1
Three - and four- family buildings
647
Five -or -more family buildings
648
All other buildings and structures
649
Section V11 — ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS OF $500,000 OR MORE
Please provide in the space below, additional information for each individual permit valued at 5500.000 or more
entered in sections 1 through V.
Item Na
from
Oascription
an
Name d address of
Ownership
.✓Mark (x)
Valuation of
construction
Number of
housing
Number
of
�
1 —V
owrlm or builder
one
(Omit cants)
units
buildings
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
la)
Kind of ng
------------------------
❑ Private
--------------------
SIM •dMesa
-- -- ------ --- ---- - - - ---
❑ Public
$
Kind of building
- --------- -- ----- - - - - --
❑Private
--------------------
SlNaddnu
------ --------- --- -- ---
❑ Public
of 1 ng
---- -------- ---- - - -- - --
❑ Private
--------------------
SiM address
- ------- --- -- ---- - --- --
❑Public
Kind of building
------------------------
❑Private
--------------------
Site�sddress
____________ ___ ______ __
C] Public
Kind of building
-- -- -- -- ----- --- - - - - ---
❑Private
--------------------
Sibsddress
--- ---- ------ ---- - -- ---
C] Public
Kind of building
- ----- ------ --- -- - -- - --
❑Private
--------------- - - - --
Site address
-- ---- -- -- ---- --- --- ---
❑Publle
Kind of building
-- ---------- -- --- - - - ---
❑Private
--------------------
Sihaddress
----- -- ---- ------ ---- --
❑Public
Kind of building
---------- -- -- -- - - -- --
❑Private
Sits address
--- -- ----- ---- --- --- ---
❑ Pubiic
Kind of building
----- -- -- -------- - - - - --
❑Private
--------------------
Siteaddress
----------- ---- -- - -- ---
❑Public
Comments
Name of person to contact regarding this report
Telephone
Area code
Number
Extension
Homer P ttman
Title
Building Official
612
587 -5151
210
FORM C•4e4 13.19-44)
{
1
1
i
i
i
l
a
t+
1
a
t
J
1f�
I
I
i
i
i
t
4P
•
•
61k]
MINUTES
LIBRARY BOARD
NOVEMBER 26, 1985
On November 26, 1985, the library board met with the following
members present: Paul Acklund, Ralph Bergstrom, John Horrocks,
Albert Linde, John Mlinar, Linda Willmsen, and librarians Mary
Henke and Norita Levy.
Suggested Meeting Room guidelines were discussed, and a motion
was made by Linda Willmsen and seconded by Paul Acklund that they
be accepted with the suggested changes.
A motion was made by John Horrocks and seconded by LincTa Willmsen
to recommend Albert Linde and Kathy McGraw be reappointed to the
library board.
Linda Willmsen requested that the library be used for an art show
to be held during SnoBreak, February 8 and 9, 1986. She stated
Terri Eilertson was in the process of organizing the show and the
library would therefore have a great deal of control over the
show. Mary volunteered to be in the library Sunday during the
show thereby eliminating the need to hire a staff member to be
present during the show. A motion was made by Paul Acklund and
seconded by John Horrocks that the library and the library board
co- sponsor the art show.
Mary discussed a number of purchases she desired to make for the
library. A small table and two chairs for the staff lounge was
requested at the cost of $380 to be purchased from Hennen
Furniture. A motion was made by Paul Acklund and seconded by
Albert Linde to purchase-the table and chairs.
Sixteen additional folding chairs are needed to bring the seating
capacity of the meeting room up to 30. Mary requested permission
to purchase these chairs from Dobratz Furniture for $21 each.
A motion was made by Linda Willmsen and seconded by Paul Acklund
to make the purchase.
A 4' x 8' piece of matting was requested for the inner entry.
A motion was made by Albert Linde and seconded by John Horrocks
that the matting be purchased from Floor Care Supply Company at
the cost of $194.
Mary mentioned that Ralph Neumann indicated that the library
information street signs will be installed in spring.
Mary requested permission to have the telephone in the reference
area moved to the work room. The cost for this transfer would
be $52. The reason for the request is that being no one was
seated at the desk in the reference area, children were playing
with the telephone. A motion was made by Paul Acklund and
seconded by Linda Willmsen that the phone be moved to the work
room.
r,,2-
The board discussed the items that remained unfinished in
connection with the building project. It was suggested that Mary
draft a letter to John Korngiebel listing all the items that have
not been completed. Each board member is to receive a copy of
the letter. Some of the items that remain unfinished include:
Heaters in entry
Tile in bathrooms
Interior library direction signs
The exterior light poles will be installed as soon as the light
bulbs arrive.
Ken Merrill advised the board that the building fund has a
remaining balance of $25,000.
Congratulations were extended to -Paul Acklund and John Mlinar for
their election to office.
A motion was made by John Horrocks and seconded by Albert Linde
to accept with regret Paul Acklund's letter of resignation from
the library board effective January 1, 1986. He cited the
increased responsibilities of his position as mayor as the main
reason for the resignation. Suggested possible replacements are
Larry Ladd, Roy Johnson and Gary Amundson.
The purchase of easels and displays for the.art show were
discussed. The chairman suggested that Terri Eilertson check
into the cost of this equipment and present her findings at the
_ next board meeting. Hopefully these purchases can be made prior
to the art show to be held in February.
Having no- further business, a motion was made by Paul Acklund and
seconded by Linda Willmsen to adjourn.
Secretary Pro- em
�J
MEETING ROOM (HUTCHINSON PUBLIC LIBRARY)
The meeting room is available at no charge to any non - profit organization,
club or group in Hutchinson. For meetings that are conducted for personal
gain of the sponsor or commercial organization, the charge will be $10
per hour.
Each organization wishing to use the meeting room must submit, in writing,
a statement of the general purpose of the meeting and the type and length
of meeting to be conducted.
Promotion for such meetings must be done outside of the library unless the
librarian agrees that the library will be a co- sponsor. If a projector
(library owned) is used, the usual fee ($3) will apply.
Smoking is prohibited in the meeting room. The room does have a small
kitchen and light lunches may be served. No alcoholic beverages are
permitted at any time.
If possible, all meetings should be scheduled when library staff is pre-
sent. Arrangements may be made in advance to stay beyond closing time or
Saturday morning if a library staff member agrees to remain. The charge
for this overtime is $6.50 per hour or fraction thereof.
The organization is responsible for its own arrangements of the meeting
-room. There are chairs for 30 people and 2 folding tables available.
The room is to be left in its original condition.
• The meeting room is generally available for monthly meetings only. On
occasion, reservations may be made for a short series of meetings within
a single week with the approval of the librarian.
(Cut Here)
MEETING ROOM APPLICATION
Name of group
Purpose of meeting
Date and time of meeting
Any damage to the room is the responsibility of the group using the room.
Signature
PUBLICATION NO. 3490
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER: Thursday, November 28, 1985
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, December 10, 1985
during the course of their regular meeting which starts at
8:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of City Hall for the
purpose o
considering the issuance of an "On Sale" Intoxicating Liquor License
to Dennis Hanson, owner of the Velvet Coach.
This hearing will be held by the City Council
of the City of Hutchinson. At such—hearing, a 1 persons interested
may be heard.
Mom FINW1,004-1
November 27, 1985
Date
S-2.
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE November 20, 1985 0
TO
FROM Dean M. O'Borsky, Chief of Police
SUBJECT Liquor License Application
A police record check and background investigation has been completed on
Dennis Vincent Hanson.
Mr. Hanson comes highly recommended and has an excellent record and
reputation.
I recommend approval of the transfer of the license.
DMO:neb
•
•
APPLICATION FOR ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
This form was prepared by the City of Hutchinson and the Minnesota
Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, Department of Public Safety, pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, 1976, Section 340.13, for purposes of back-
ground investigation. It does not supersede any laws, rules or
regulations of the Division of Liquor Control regarding the issuance
of liquor licenses. Failure to provide information requested may
result in denial of the application.
1. The Velvet Coach Inn November 14, 1985
Trade Name Date of Application
2. January 1, 1986 to March 30, 1986
Licensing Period
3. Type of Application: New Renewal ® Transfer .
r
4. Dennis Vincent Hanson 612- 523 -5555
Name of Applicant Phone
5. 302 East Oak Avenue Olivia, Ma. 562TT
Home Address
6. Citizenship: American
Minneapolis, Mn.
7, Sentemher 1'[� 10`i7
Place of Birth Date of Birth
B. Highway T East
Address of Business Location
Part of lot 11 / auditors plot 14 /of auditors plot vest ;i Sect. 32, range 29.
9.
Legal Description
10. List owners of building or premise to be licensed:
Denny and Ann Hanson
11. List all P artners, officers or directors, if corporation:
Name Address Date of Birth
Denny Hanson Olivia, Mn. 9 -1T -3T
Ann Hanson Olivia, Mn. 12 -29 -38
12. Prior experience in this type of business: 15 years owner- operator of The Sheep
Shedde Inn, Olivia, Mn. 6 Years owner- operator of Rosy's Supper Club; Montevideo, MN.
13. Present ownership in any other liquor establishment: Yes -The Sheep Shedde_Inn.
14. Present ownership in any other restaurant or food business: Yes. above
15. Three Business References: American State Bank Olivia, Mn. 562TT 612 -523 -1111
Citizen State Bank Olivia, Mn. 562TT 612 - 523 -2265
American Fruit and Produce P.O.Box 43039, St. Paul, MN. 55164 800 -382 -200T
16. The Velvet Coach Inn
Corporate or Partnership Title
17. Highway T east, Hutchinson, MN.
Corporate or Partnership Address
18. If this is a transfer application give name, address, of persons, partnership or
corporation holding license for the past year.
Ast Saar Jr. DBA The Velvet Coach Supper Club
19. Who owns the bar /tavern fixtures? Denny Hanson
20. Are you a Minnesota resident? a Yes El No 1963 present
Frdm To
If not, where resident? Dates of Residency
21. Residential Address during Past Five (5) Years: 302 East Oak Avenue Olivia, Mn. 562T7
22. Three Personal References: David Fleming Olivia 612 -523 -1111
Charles Erickson Olivia, Mn. 612 -523 -2265 Hick Kranz Olivia, MN. 612 - 523 -1302
23. Employment for the Past Five Years: Owner- operator: The Sheep Shedde Olivia, MN. 562TT
24. Any Convictions Other Than Minor Traffic: None
25. This application must be accompanied by detailed statement of net worth and last year's
tax return and statement of method of payment for business, fixtures and inventory.
26. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the
Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intoxicating
liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Commissioner; and
all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have read the fore-
going questions and that the answers to said questions are true of my own knowledge.
I further understand that an investigation fee not to exceed $500.00 shall be charged
an applicant by the city or oounty if the investigation is cond w hip the state,
or the cost not to exceed $10,000.00 if the investigation i equir outside the
state. i further understand the ordinances of the City eutc son regarding the
operation of on -sale liquor licenses and agree to abi by //
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
(`day off[ , 19.
(Notary Public)
My Commission Expires:
k6'1L NE STAHL
S! ►pTMT r1MlIC .- y1NNElOTA
RIEMNZLE COUNTY
U, conrNWon � Sept 11. 100
•
it
•
•
•
L]
CITIZENS PUBLIC HEARING
... I - 0 , , JA ',- .... ,,, - ; I
Tuesday, December 10, 19852 8 p.m.
City Council Chambers
on
PROPOSED POLICE STATION
FINANCING ALTERNATIVES
• Estimated Project Cost, $1,000,000
• Estimated Square Footage, 10,000 sq. ft.
•To meet the need for 20 years or longer
PUBLIC FINANCING ALTERNATIVE
• Referendum would be required
• Revenue sharing funds could be combined with
referendum approved bond issue
PRIVATE FINANCING ALTERNATIVE
• No referendum required
• Facility could be leased or purchased on an
installment contract.
The Citizens Police Facilities Committee findings are on file
in the office of the City Administrator, City Hall, for Public In-
spection. The current available Federal Revenue Sharing Funds
are $372,000, with additional monies anticipated to be re-
ceived in 1986.
L97.99
Mchimon Leader 12 03 85
s�
•
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, November 26th, 19859 and on
Tuesday, December 3rd, 1985.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 86 -06
PUBLICATION NO. 3489
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
Will meet in the Council Chambers of the-City Hall at 8 :00 T.M. on the 10th _
day of December, 19859 to consider the Making of an improvement on Hilltop
Drive and Lindy Lane in Kimberly Country Estates by the construction of Gravel
Base, Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such
improvement is the benefited property. The estimated cost of such improvement
is $19,200.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the -
proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting.
Is ZA-4�- Q�L
City Cle
0
Dated: November 25th, 1985
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS DWORTANT THAT YOU ATMW THIS HEAR171G, V02THE t 200 ARE _.
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN OEM THAT YOUR COONCIEL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TROB REPRE3EBTATIO19 OF OPINION.
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND T;R�-;'P "_RATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
to PROJECT NO. 86 -05
Resolution No. 8170
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 12th day of
November, 1985, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement
of Hilltop Drive and Lindy Lane in Kimberly Country Estates by the
construction of Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances,
AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon
on the 10th day of December, 1985, at which all persons desiring to be heard
were given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 12th day of November, 1985.
2. Marlow V. Priebe is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
0 Adopted by the council this 10th day of December, 1985.
Clerk
•
Mayor
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
• PROJECT NO. 86 -05
Resolution No. 8171
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on December 10th,
1985, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of Hilltop Drive and Lindy Lane in Kimberly Country Estates by the
construction of Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances, and has
presented such plans.and specifications to the council for approval,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at
2 :00 P.M. on January 21st, 1986, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Clerk
Adopted by the council this 10th day of December, 1985.
Mayor
S c.
r (612) 587.5151
C/T Y OF HUTCH /NSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Homber Pittman, Building Official
RE: 30th Annual Institute for Building Officials -
I hereby request permission for James Marka and myself -to attend the 30th
Annual Institute for Building Officials, January 15 -17, 1986.
This is a budgeted item and we are asking now, because some of the seminars
are limited to a certain number of people and we must get the registration
in early to get into the seminar. We, also, receive college credits for
this.
The registration is $90.00 each.
HP /Rv
L]
Homer Pittman
Building Official
CO
(612) 587 -5151 --
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Vacation _
Based on articles in the Leader while I was on vacation last year, I determined
it would be necessary to consider a split vacation this year.
I propose to be on vacation, beginning December 23, 1985 and completing same
on January 17, 1986..
The new policy adopted recently, on use of off -duty time, is very restrictive.
I find that my work load is heavy until I leave and does not permit me to
46 utilize some off -duty time prior to my vacation.
I, therefore, request permission to combine Holiday, Vacation and Old Earned
Comp Time during my above- mentioned vacation.
I realize that unless the policy is corrected, future vacations will have to
consist of Holiday and Vacation time only.
MVP /pv
* .0
N
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
� -c
e
1 L
,.. ..................!
y-----------------
r
T r
TP■ t�. Ii t /.MT � l6 'm
.ePP TwP6 e •
YP•h�{{ Sl 4 4 r{�I.Y,fr W[ it
atl /a rqy � ne PRWPP •L'J * � � S a
M
? ■r[ ^B
YMam6 f•r T. IT ar! I a'1S.■SMf NITR on iR I +FTP
R11! EuIiLY ' .rr a r t '� i
l � RRii 1. Y
lP/P W.1m .vll ; � ��_.. ... ...........- ----=�--
+I+L.WIlR
—4-! IYl � 0
1 T .rF .Ll. •.e � — -- - -
�r
x'l —State
$ t R Y %City Streets
I LidPEP •„R j
r r Hutchinson Utilities
"" ° ° ■" r — Dakota Rail
Parks & Recreation
j aal Y, rlP
�, f !c C•PC Lf .Y
r � + � i 1 ♦; ,
----------------- @ - - ° HUTCHINSON
%4wTA VC
MINNESOTA
i Tr
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 5, 1985
TO: Mayor & City Council
------------------------- - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------- - - - - --
SUBJECT: Request By Frank Fay For Reimbursement Of IRB Deposit
------------------------ - - - - --
Please review the attached correspondence from Frank Fay regarding his
request for a return of a deposit. Please be aware that the Citv has
incurred some costs in regard to this project. I would suggest that
this item be tabled to the next reQ_ular City Council meeting and a list-
ing of expenses be prepared by the Finance Director.
In addition, I would recommend that the City Attorney be directed to
prepare a written legal opinion regarding the possible withholding of
the return of the deposit in view of the unpaid expenses incurred on
this project.
It is my understanding that the hotel may revert back to Lowell Wake-
field. He has expressed interest in continuing the project. Therefore,
some of the expenses may continue with the project.
/ms
0-10
�-E
Frank J. Fal Better
e° PAWt 1 i N Homes
INC. 126 Main South Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Telephone (612) 587 -2341
1985
�y Hall RE: Hutch Hotel
Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Gary Plotz
City Administrator
Dear Gary:
This is to inform you that Curtis Burckhardt and I will not be
able to continue the project of rehabilitating the Hutch Hotel.
We, therefore, request the return of the $5,000.00 which we
deposited with the State on August 31, 1985.
We are very grateful to you and your staff, Mayor Stearns and
the entire council for the support during the long process
regarding this matter.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
rank J. Fa _
President
FJF /g jb
cc: Curtis Burckhardt
I*,*
�-'E
•
ORDINANCE NO. 19/85
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 464 CONCERNING
ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
The following described real prop?rty is hereby rezoned from R -2 to
R -3 Multi-le Family Residence District.
Lot 9, Block 4, Southview Subdivision
Adopted by the City Council this day of , 1985.
w
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
0
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
rl - g I
ORDINANCE NO. 466
An ordinance to regulate the subdivision of land, the laying out of streets,
and the safe development of other urban services and facilities.
SECTION 1 -- The Municipal Code of the City of Hutchinson be amended to include
the following Subdivision Platting Regulations:
1.00 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1.10 PURPOSE: Land subdivision is the first step in the process of community
development. Once land has been divided into streets, blocks, lots and
open spaces, a pattern has been established which determines how well
community needs for residence, business and industry will be met. It
also determines, to a great extent, how well the community will be able to
handle its traffic circulation problems, how well it will be able to meet
the demand for home sites and how efficiently and economically it will be
able to provide the many services that are required.
These subdivision regulations are designed to provide for harmonious
development of a subdivided area; for a coordinated layout; for the
proper arrangement of streets; for adequate and convenient spaces for
traffic, utilities, recreation, light, air, and access for fire fighting
equipment; and for adequate provision of water, drainage, sewer and other
sanitary facilities. These regulations shall not apply to land used only
for agricultural purposes.
1.20
LEGAL AUTHORITY: This ordinance is enacted pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes 1965, Section 462.358.
1.30
TITLE: This ordinance sha44 be knewn and may be cited and referred
to as the Rakes and Regu4at4ons for the P4att4ng and Sabd4v4d4ng of
Eand 4n the City of Hateh4nson; Minnesota: Subdivision Regulations
for the City of Hutchinson.
1:48
SHORT TITLE- Subd4v4s4on Regu4at4ons of the E4ty of Hateh4nsen:
1.40
JURISDICTION: The regulations herein governing plats and the subdivision
of land shall apply within the corporate limits of the City as determined
by plat at the time of application and the unincorporated area within two
miles of its limits provided that where a municipality lies less than
four miles from the limits of the City of Hutchinson, these regulations
shall apply only to a line equidistant from the City of Hutchinson and
said municipality, and provided further, that the governing body or
bodies of unincorporated towns adjacent to the City have not adopted
ordinances for the regulation of subdivision of land or platting. Copies
of resolutions approving subdivision plats of land outside the City but
not subject to Township subdivision regulations shall be filed with the
Clerk of the town in which the land is situated.
1.50 APPLICATION OF ORDINANCE: Any plat, hereafter made, for each subdivision
or each part thereof lying within the jurisdiction of this Ordinance,
shall be prepared, presented for approval, and recorded as herein
prescribed. The regulations contained herein shall apply to the
subdivision of a lot, tract or parcel of land into three or more lots,
or other division of land for the purpose of sale or building
•tracts
•
development, whether immediate or future, including the re-subdivision or
7 -2•
replatting of land or lots. Division of land in tracts larger than five
(5) acres in area and 300 feet in width shall be exempt from the
requirements of this Ordinance.
1.60 CONVEYANCE OF LAND: No conveyance of land in which the land conveyed is
described by metes and bounds, or by reference to a plat made after
adoption of these platting regulations without recommendation P Plannin
Commission ' by Council resolution, shams be made or recor ed if
The p— ar�described in the conveyance is less than five (5) acres in
area and 300 feet in width unless such parcel is a separate parcel of
record at the time of adoption of this ordinance or unless an agreement
to convey such smaller parcel was entered into prior to such time and the
instrument showing the agreement to convey is recorded in the office of
the Reg4ster of Beeds County Recorder within one year hereafter.
1.70 RIGHT OF BUILDING PERMIT REFUSAL: The City Engineer and /or Building
Inspector shall refuse building permits and utility services to any
parcel of property conveyed by metes and bounds description in viola-
tion of this ordinance.
1.80 PUBLIC STREET GRANTS: No grant of a public street to the City by
deed shall be filed without the approval of the Council by a
resolution to that effect.
2.00 DEFINITIONS: As used -in these regulations, certain terms and conditions are
herewith defined as follows:
2.01 CON MISSION: The advisory Planning Commission of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota.
2.02 MAP: A drawing showing one or more parcels of land.
2.03 PLAT: A map showing a plan for the subdivision of land which is
submitted for approval and is intended in final form for recording.
2.04 STEET: A way set aside for vehicular traffic, regardless of size or
designation, but excluding private driveways serving only one parcel of
land.
2.041 ARTERIAL STREETS AND HIGHWAYS: are those designed or utilized
primarily for vehicular speeds and /or for heavy volumes of traffic.
2.042 COLLECTOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS: are those designed or utilized to
carry intermediate volumes of traffic from minor streets to arterial
streets.
2.043 LOCAL STREETS: are those which are used or will be used primarily
for access to abutting properties and which carry limited volumes of
traffic.
2.044 SERVICE DRIVES: are minor streets which are parallel and adjacent to
higher classified thoroughfares which serve to reduce the number of
access points to those thoroughfares and thereby increase traffic
safety.
2.045 ALLEYS: are minor ways which are used primarily for vehicular
service access to the backs or to the sides of properties which
otherwise abut on streets.
2
gel
�10 0
2.05 SUBDIVISION: is a described tract of land which is to be or has been
divided into three or more lots or plots for the purpose of immediate
or future transfer of ownership for the purpose of sale or of building
development, including the re- subdivision or replatting of land or lots.
Division of land in tracts larger than five acres in area and three
hundred (300) feet in width and which does not involve any new streets or
easements of access shall be exempt from the requirements of this
ordinance.
2.06 TRANSPORTATION PLAN: The part of the Comprehensive Plan, now or hereafer
adopted which includes a major street and highway plan and sets forth the
location, alignment, dimension, identification, and classification of
existing and proposed streets, highways and other thoroughfares.
2.07 ZONING ORDINANCE: City Ordiance #464 as amended, including the
official zoning map which divides the jurisdiction of the Commission
into districts with regulations, requirements and procedures for the
establishment of land use controls.
2.08 LOT: A lot is a piece or parcel of land occupied or to be occupied by a
building or use, or as a unit for the transfer of ownership.
2.09 BLOCK: A -block is the distance as measured along a street between
intersecting streets from center line to center line; and where the
context requires, it also means the enclosed area within the perimeter
of the streets or property lines enclosing it.
2.10 CITY: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota.
2.11 CITY COUNCIL: City Council and the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota.
2.24 STORM SEWER: Storm sewer is a constructed conduit for carrying
surface waters to a drainage course.
2.25 SETBACK: Setback is the building setback line of distance as
measured from the nearest street, road, or water shoreline.
2.26 SUBDIVIDER: is any person, individual firm, association, syndicate,
co- partnership, corporation, trust or other legal entity commencing
proceedings under this Ordinance to effect a subdivision of land.
2.27 SURVEYOR: is a duly Registered Land Surveyor employed by the
subdivider for the preparation of subdivision surveys or plats as
required by this ordinance and State Statute, and in accordance with
City Ordinance and State law.
2.28 UTILITIES: Utilities includes watermains san�itar,t sewer lines storm
sewer lines, ower_ Tines, gas 1 Ines, telephone
1 ines�- (.able 1.V--
iT`nes.
3.00 PRELIMINARY PLAT
3.10 ADVISORY MEETING WITH CITY PLANNING STAFF: Before preparing a
Preliminary Plat and submitting it to the Planning Commission for
approval, the subdivider shall meet and consult informally with the City
Planning Staff for the purpose of ascertaining the locations of proposed
3
major streets, parks, playgrounds, school sites, and other planned
projects which may affect the property being considered for subdivision.
At the same meeting, the subdivider shall review with the City Planning
Staff the minimum standards of subdivision design set forth in Section
5.00. This informal review should prevent unnecessary and costly
revisions in the layout and development of the subdivision. Formal
application or filing of a plat with the City of Hutchinson is not
required for this informal advisory meeting.
3.20 PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUIRED: Before submission of a Final Plat, the
subdivider shall prepare and submit to the City Clerk Preliminary
Plats of the land he proposes to develop as described in Section 3.42.
The Preliminary Plats shall be submitted only after the Advisory
Meeting with the City Planning Staff and prior to the making of any
street improvements or the installation of any utilities.
3.30 PRELIMINARY PLAT DATA: The Preliminary Plat shall meet the standards
of design as set forth in Section 5.00 and shall show the following
information:
3.3101 Scale of one hundred (100) feet to one (1) inch or larger.
3.3102 Name of Subdivision, name and address of the owners, the engineer
or surveyor, and the owners of the adjacent property.
3.3103 Location of subdivision by section, town, range or other legal
description together with small scale sketch showing location
within the section.
3.3104 Date, approximate north point, and graphic scale.
3.3105 Acreage of land to be subdivided. do
3.3106 Zoning classification of lands to be subdivided and all adjacent
lands.
3.3107 Contours at an interval of two (2) feet.
3.3108 Boundary lines of area to be subdivided and their bearings and
distances.
3.3109 Existing and proposed easements and their locations, widths, and
distances.
3.3110 Streets on and adjacent to the tract and their names, widths,
proposed approximate grades and proposed relative ground eleva-
tions at the intersections of all streets and every 100 feet along
such streets and at the corners or extremities of the plat, and
other dimensions as may be required. Elevations shall be to city
datum or if unavailable, a bench mark for the plat shall be shown.
3.3111 Utilities on and adjacent to the tract showing proposed
connections to existing utility systems. Rear and front and
sidelot easements for at444ty pa4es and wires utilities shall be
provided wherever possible. Data to be pro vi ed U— clu es types of
utility; location of manholes, catch basins, hydrants, etc.;
approximate depth of pipe, size of pipe and direction of flow.
4
cei
w
• •
3.3112 Lot line, lot numbers, and approximate lot dimensions.
3.3113 Sites and their acreages, if any, to be reserved or dedicated for
parks, recreation areas, open spaces, schools, or other public uses.
Sites, if any, for semi - public, commerical, or multi - family uses.
3.3114 Minimum building setback lines.
3.3115 Location of railroads, streams, natural and proposed drainage
courses, permanent buildings, or other structures.
3.3116 Other reasonable information, such as percolation and other soil
tests, if so requested by the Commission in order to make a proper
review of the site.
3.3117 Copies of proposed deed restrictions, if any, shall be attached to the
Preliminary Plat.
3.3118 An informal statement as to the general plan of improvements,
drainage and development.
3.40 PRELIMINARY PLAT PROCEDURES:
3.41 Prior to submittal of the Preliminary Plat, in the case of any proposed
plat which includes lands abutting upon any existing or established
trunk highway or proposed highway which has been designated by a
center line order found in the office of the Reg4ster of Beeds Count
Recorder, the plat shall first be presented to the State Commissioner
H4ghways of the Department of Transportation for his written comments
and recommendations. The Commissioner of Highways the Department of
Transportation shall submit written comments to the City in accordance
with State Law. In requesting the comments of the Commissioner of
H4ghways the Department of Trans oration, the subdivider shall include
a written statement describing the outlet for and means of disposal of
surface waters in the proposed platted area.
3.42 Ten Twelve copies of the Preliminary Plat and supplementary material
specified shall be submitted to the City Clerk for filing with a
written application for conditional approval.
3.43 The City Clerk shall , upon receipt of a Preliminary Plat, retai n one
copy, refer one copy to the Zoning Administrator, and refer two
copies to the Engineer for review as to completeness of information.
If found to be incomplete, the application will be returned to the
deve 1 oper. If found to be comp 1 ete, the p 1 at wi 11 be referred to
other City Department heads, the Utilities Commission, the Telephone
Company and Cable T.V., for review as necessary.
3.44 Upon review by City Department heads, the Utilities Commission, the
Telephone Company and Cable T.V.,the copy of the plat together with
al I comments and suggested revisions shall be referred to the Plan-
ning Commission for a public hearing. The Preliminary Plat shall
receive the approval of the Engineer as to engineering considerations
prior to consideration by the Planning Commission. A certificate of
approval by the Engineer shall be attached to the Preliminary Plat.
3.45 The City of Hutchinson shall notify the subdivider by eertifted mail
of the time and place of the public hearing not less than five (5)
A
days before the date fixed for the hearing. Similar notice shall be
mailed to the owners of the land immediately adjoining the area to be
subdivided as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Time and place of the
public hearing shall be published at least once in the official
newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The publica-
tion shall include a drawing which shows the location of the proposed
subdivision.
3.46 Within sixty (60) days after the hearing on the Preliminary Plat, the
Planning Commission shall recommend approval, disapproval, or approval
subject to modifications of the said plat to the City Council.
Failure of -the Planning Commission to act on this Preliminary Plat
within sixty (60) days shall be deemed a recommendation of approval
of the plat. If a plat is recommended for disapproval, reasons for
such disapproval must be stated in writing. If approval subject to
modifications is recommended, the nature of the required modifica-
tions shall be indicated in writing. The Planning Commission shall
then forward the Preliminary Plat together with its recommendations
to the City Council for final action. The final action of the City
Council shall be noted on two (2) copies of the Preliminary Plat with
any notations made at the time of approval, disapproval of the
specific changes required. One (1) copy shall be returned to the
subdivider and the other placed on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
3.47 Approval of the Preliminary Plat shall not constitute acceptance of
the Final Plat. The approval of the Preliminary Plat shall lapse
unless a Final Plat based thereon is submitted within six (6) months
from the date of such approval. An extension of time may be applied
for by the subdivider and granted by the City Council.
3.50 SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF A LARGER TRACT: Whenever part of a tract
is proposed to be subdivided and it is intended to subdivide
additional parts of the tract in the future, a sketch plan for the
entire tract showing the proposed platting arrangement shall be
submitted to the Planning Commission at the time the Preliminary Plat
for the first part of the tract to be platted is submitted.
3.60 PLAT REVIEW CHARGE: A filing fee will be charged at the time of
filing the Preliminary Plat to offset administrative costs in
processing the application. This fee will be assessed once for each
preliminary plat application submitted; no additional fee will be
charged for filing a final p 1 at. Such fee will be computed on the
basis of a minimum fee of $25:99; p4us $1:99 for each 4ot w4th a
max4mum fee of $159:99r as determined by resolution of the City
Council of the City of NutchInson.
4.00 FINAL PLAT
4.10 FINAL PLAT DATA AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA: The final plat shall be
prepared at a scale of 1" = 100' in the following numbers: One (1)
mylar reproducible stamped "City Copy ", signed; Two (2) mylar repro-
ducible stamped "copy ", signed; One (1) cloth, stamped "Original ",
signed and Two (2) cloth stamped "copy ", signed. The Final Plat
shall be prepared on sheets 20" wide and 30" in length with a 2" left
border line and a 1/2" top, bottom and right border line. The Final
Plat shall include the following information and any other informa-
tion required by State law:
R
9101
4.101
Data required by State Law to fully describe the land to be
platted including accurate dimensions, angles, bearings to
describe boundaries, streets, easements, areas reserved for
public purpose and other important features.
4.102
Name and right -of -way width of each street, highway, easement,
or other rights of way as required by State Law.
4.103
Lot numbers, lot lines, and dimensions.
4.104
Purpose for which sites, other than residential lots, are
dedicated or reserved.
4.105
Location of rivers, streams, creeks, lakes, ponds, swamps as
required by State Law.
4.106
Location and description of monuments as required by State Law.
4.107
Names and location of adjoining subdivision, streets and
unplatted properties.
4.108
Certification on plat of title showing that the applicant is the
owner and a statement by such owner dedicating street, rights -of-
way, and any other sites for public use.
4.109
Certification on plat by surveyor as to the accuracy of survey
and plat.
4.110 Certification on plat by the City Clerk that the plat has been
approved for recording in the office of the County Register of
Beeds Recorder.
4.111 Certification that the subdivider has complied with one of the
following alternatives shall be submitted with the Final Plat:
a. All the improvements have been installed in accordance with
the requirements of these regulations, or
b. A bond has been posted with the City which is in an amount
determined by the Council to be sufficient to complete the
improvements and installations in compliance with these regu-
lations, is with a surety satisfactory to the Council, and
which specifies the time for the completion of the improve-
ments and installations.
c. A subdivision agreement will be signed by the subdivider and
the City relative to improvements and appurtenances to the plat.
4.112 Cross-sections, profiles and grades of streets, curbs, gutters
and sidewalks showing locations of in- street utilities, and drawn
to standard scales and elevations shall be submitted with the
Final Plat: when improvements are installed under 4.111 "a" or
N 4.113 Protective covenants, if any, shall be submitted with the Final
Plat.
7
4.114
Letters of approval of highway access points and service roads
from the Commissioner of Highways the Department of Transporation
and the County Engineer, as applicable, shall be submitted with
the Final Plat.
4.20
FINAL PLAT PROCEDURE:
4.21
Fear t4} Twelve (12) paper print copies of the final plat together
with any street profiles, other plans and certifications as indicated
in Section 4.10 that may be required shall be submitted to the City
Clerk by the subdivider.
4.22
One (1) paper print copy of the Final Plat shall be transmitted to the
Engineer who will check said plat as to computations, monuments,
etc., and that all the required improvements have been completed to
the satisfaction of the City, or, in the case a security bond has
been posted, that it is sufficient to cover the cost of the required
improvements. If found satisfactory, he the en ineer will refer the
paper print copy of the Final Plat to the Planning Commission with his
the engineer's approval certified thereon within thirty (30) days of
receipt thereof.
4.23
Within sixty (60) days after the submittal of the Final Plat, the
Planning Commission shall recommend approval or disapproval of the
said Plat. Failure of the Planning Commission to act upon this
Final Plat within sixty (60) days shall be deemed a recommendation
of approval of the Plat. If Plat disapproval is recommended, the
grounds for disapproval shall be stated in the records of the Plan-
ning Commission. A plat shall not be recommended for approval
unless it:
4
a. Conforms to the Preliminary Plat.
b. Conforms to the design standards set forth in this ordinance.
c. Conforms to the adopted Comprehensive Plat.
d. Is in accordance with all requirements and laws of the State of
Minnesota.
The Planning Commission shall then forward the plat together with
its recommendations to the City Council for final action.
4.231
It is the intent of this ordinance that a paper copy of the final
plat go to the Planning Commission and City Engineer for review
and to the City Council for action. When the paper print of the
final plat has been approved by the City Council, the developer
shall then cause the required mylar, cloth, paper and sepia
prints to be made with the approval of the City certified
thereon, and distributed according to State Statute.
4.24
When the Final Plat has been approved by the City Council, the
required copies shall be returned to the subdivider, with the
approval of the City certified thereon, for filing with the County
Register of Beeds Recorder as an official plat of record.
4.25
Upon aproval of the Final Plat, the subdivider shall record it with
Register of Beeds the County Recorder within two hundred seventy
8
(270) days (3126/85) in the manner specified by State Law. Otherwise
the approval shall become void unless a request for extension has
been made in writing an approved by the City Council.
5.00 MINIMUM IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED: The developer shall provide the
following improvements before approval of a plat; or shall provide
the necessary funds in escrow; or shall provide a performance bond
in an amount necessary to insure compliance with the installation of
improvements as herein required. Provided, however, that the City
Council may also accept petitions for said improvements to be instal-
led on a special assessment basis. All of the improvements required
in this section shall be constructed -only after the plans and
specifications thereof have been approved by the City.
No areas platted after the date of this ordinance outside the City
of Hutchinson or properties subdivided by metes and bounds descrip-
tions after date of this ordinance will be accepted for annexation
unless it shall substantially conform or can be made to substantially
conform to the minimum standards herein.
5.01 GENERAL: The plat shall conform to the Official Map and other
parts of the adopted Comprehensive Plan of the City of Hutchinson.
5.02 OFFICIAL MAP: Whenever a tract to be subdivided embraces any part
of an arterial or collector street or highway, so designated on the
Official Map, such part shall be platted by the subdivider in the
location and at the width indicated on said plan.
5.03 DRAINAGE AND- FLOOD HAZARD AREAS: The right is reserved to
disapprove any subdivision which is subject to poor drainage.
However, if the subdivider agrees to make such improvements as will
make the area safe for residential occupancy, the subdivision may
be approved, subject however, to the approval of the Engineer.
No land shall be subdivided which is held unsuitable by the City
Council for reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply or
sewage treatment facilities. All lots within the flood plain
districts shall contain a building site at or above the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation. Al l subdivisions shall have water and
sewage disposal facilities that comply with the provisions of this
Ordinance and have road access both to the subdivision and to the
individual building sites no lower than two feet below the Regulatory
Flood Protection Elevation. (10/14/80)
5.04 COMMUNITY ASSETS: In all subdivisions, due regard shall be shown
for natural features such as trees, unusual rock formations, and
water courses; for sites which have historical significance; and for
similar assets which, if preserved, will add attractiveness and
value to the subdivision and to the community. The Planning Commis-
sion may prepare a list of all such features within its area of
subdivision jurisdiction which it deems worth of preservation.
5.05 MONUMENTS AND STAKES: All subdivision boundary corners, block and
lot corners, street intersection corners, and points of tangency and
curvature shall be marked with survey monuments consisting of
minimum 5/8" steel rods 24" in length. Inscribed on the monument or
cap, according to State Statute, shall be the registration number of
the land surveyor making the survey. A l l U.S., State, County and
4
other official bench marks, monuments or triangulation stations in
or adjacent to the property shall be preserved in precise position.
5.10 PUBLIC SITE AND OPEN SPACES: The following requirements are
applicable to al l subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the
Commission.
5.101 In subdividing land or resubdividing an existing plat, due
consideration shall be given by the subdivider and by the Planning
Commission upon review, to the dedication or reservation of
suitable sites for schools, conservation areas or other public or
semi - public recreational areas, or open spaces and parks.
Where a proposed public park, recreational area or open space, as
determined by the Comprehensive Plat, Planning Commission and /or
City Council, is located in whole or in part within a subdivision,
the subdivider shall make available such lands to the City of
Hutchinson -- provided, however, that the total mandatory
dedication (exclusive or public streets, alleys, and pedestrian
ways and exclusive of all other purchased sites such as fire and
police stations, water towers and treatment plants, and sewer lift
stations) shall not exceed ten percent of the total gross acreage
owned or controlled by the subdivider.
Where an area that is specifically designated by the Comprehensive
Plan or City Council for a public park, recreation area, or open
space exceeds the area equivalent to ten percent of the area of
the total acreage owned by the subdivider, the entire area shall
be reserved for such use on all subdivision plans and plats; and
the acquisition of such additional area shall then be secured by
the City of Hutchinson or arrangements made for its acquisition
within a period not to exceed two years from the date of approval
of the preliminary plan. The value of the subject land before
improvements, shall be established by three qualified appraisers,
one of whom shall be appointed by the City Council, one by the
subdivider, and one of whom shall be mutually agreed upon by the
other two.
5.102 Where less than ten percent of the total gross area being
subdivided is proposed for public parks, recreation areas or open
spaces as designated by the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning
Commission, or City Council, the subdivider shall dedicate such
area that is less than ten percent, and, in addition, pay to the
City of Hutchinson a sum of money so that either or both the
dedication and the payment equal ten percent of the land before it
is subdivided. The cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall
be in accordance with the park contribution schedule as adopted
by the City Council.
5.103 If no park or open space area is required in the subdivision by
the Planning Commission or Council, a cash payment in accordance
with the park contribution schedule shall be paid, by the owner or
subdivider, to the City of Hutchinson.
5.104 Sums of money so received by the City of Hutchinson shall be
placed in a special account to be known as the Public Sites Fund
and allocated by the City Council solely for the acquisition of
land for public parks, recreation areas or open spaces,
10
Sol
development of existing parks and recreation areas, or debt
retirement in connection with land previously acquired for parks,
recreation areas, or open areas.
5.105 In al l subdivisions and planned developments, it shall be the
city's option to determine whether to accept a dedication of land
or a cash equivalent as determined in 5.101 above.
5.15 Soil and water conservation: Pursuant to state statute, the
following may be required:
5.151 The subdivider shall be responsible for providing site
development plans with provisions for the control of drainage,
erosion and siltation if said plans are considered necessary by
the City Engineer for the purpose of soil and water conservation..
5.20 STREET AND BLOCK LAYOUT: The following requirements are applicable_
to all subdivisions within the City of Hutchinson.
5.201 The Subdivision shall be so designed as to be in harmony with
adjacent subdivision and provide for the continuation of existing
streets. Provisions shall be made for streets through the
subdivision for the platting of contiguous property. No strip of
unplatted land or portion of street or artifice shall be used or
retained by the subdivider to impede the platting of adjacent
parcels.
5.202 The street layout shall provide access adequate for emergency and
public service vehicles to all lots and parcels of land within the
subdivision.
5.203 Where appropriate to the design, streets shall be established to
avoid jogs at intersections and to promote continuity of local
streets and those of higher clasifications. Street jogs with
centerline offsets of less than one hundred and twenty -five (125)
feet shall be discouraged.
5.204 Streets shall be established to take advantage of the contour of
the land so as to produce usable lots, cause a minimum of cutting
and filling, and to produce streets with reasonable grades as
defined in Section 5.50. _
5.205 Certain proposed streets, where appropriate, shall be extended to
the boundary line of the tract to provide for adequate circulation
of traffic within the vicinity.
5.206 Streets shall intersect other streets as near to a 90 angle as
topography and other factors permit. Intersections of streets and
arterial or col lector streets shall be limited to a minimum angle
of 70 unless specifically approved by the Commission.
5.207 Whenever there exists a dedicated or platted portion of a street
or alley adjacent to the proposed subdivision which conforms to
the Official Map, the remainder of the street or alley shall be
platted to the prescribed width within the proposed subdivision.
5.208 Half -width streets shall be prohibited except where essential to
the reasonable development of the subdivision in conformity with
11
the other requirements of these regulations. Where an existing,
half -width street adjoins a portion of the boundary of a proposed
subdivision, street dedication in a width needed to make this a
full -width street may be required.
5.209 Street and right-of -way widths shall conform to those indicated in .
the Transportation Plan. Where such widths are not prescribed
therein, the widths shall not be less than the minimums stated in
Section 5.30.
5.210 Alleys shall be platted i n the rear of a l l lots to be used for
commercial or industrial purposes. Al leys wi 11 not be approved in
residential area, unless required by unusual topography or other
exceptional conditions.
5.211 Lands abutting arterial or collector streets shall be platted with
the view of making the lots, if for residential use, desireable
for such use by cushioning the impact of heavy traffic on such
trafficways; and with the view also of minimizing interference
with traffic on such trafficways as well as the accident hazard.
This may be accomplished in several ways:
5.2112 By not fronting the lots on the highway or thoroughfare but on a
parallel local street at a distance-of a generous lot depth, in
which case private driveways shall connect with such local street;
5.2113 By a collector street platted more or less parallel with the
highway or thoroughfares, six hundred (600) to one thousand (1000)
feet distance therefrom, from which loop streets or dead end
streets would extend toward the highway, the ends of which provide
access to the lots abutting the highway to their rear.
5.212 Dead end streets will be approved if limited to five hundred (500)
feet long provided a permanently designed turn around area having
a minimum dfiameter radius to the edge of the finished street or curb
line of not less than fifty f58j fifty -three (53) feet and a minimum
roadway diameter right -of -way radius of seventy {38} sixty (60) feet,
is constructed.
5.213 Closed subdivisions (with one exit) shall not be permitted.
5.214 Blocks shall have sufficient width to provide for two tiers of
lots of appropriate depth, unless, in the opinion of the
Commission, prevented by unusual togography or other physical
conditions.
5.215 The lengths, widths and shapes of blocks, and lots with blocks,
shall be determined with due regard to:
5.2151 Provision of adequate building sites suitable to the special
needs of the principal and all required accessory uses.
5.2152 Zoning requirements as to lot sizes and dimensions, and provisions
regulating off - street parking and loading spaces.
5.2153 Needs for convenient access, circulation, control and safety of
street traffic.
12
$*I
•
5.2154 Limitations and opportunities of topography.
5.2155 Generally, blocks shall not exceed thirteen hundred twenty (1320)
feet nor be less than five hundred (500) feet in length measured
along the greatest dimension of the block.
5.216 Residential blocks shall normally be of sufficient width for two
tiers of lots. Block lengths shall be determined by circulation
and other needs. Where residential blocks with lots deeper than
two hundred (200) feet are proposed, a reservation for a future
street through the middle of the block, longitudinally, may be
required.
5.217 Pedestrian crosswalks, not less than ten (10) feet wide, shall be
required where deemed essential to provide circulation, or access
to schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation and
other community facilities.
5.218 The number of intersecting streets along arterial and collector
streets shall be held to a minimum, and where practicable, blocks
along such trafficways shall not be less than eight hundred (800)
feet in length.
5.30 MINIMUM WIDTHS FOR STREETS AND ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY: For all public
ways hereafter dedicated and accepted, the minimum right -of -way
widths for streets and thoroughfares shall be shown in the
Comprehensive Plan and where not shown therein, the minimum right -
of -way width for streets, arterial highways or pedestrian ways
included in any subdivision shall not be less than the minimum
dimensions for each classification as follows:
Classification
Principal Arterial Highway
Minor Arterial Highway /Cty.Rd
Collector Streets
Local Streets
Service Drives
Alley
Pedestrian Way
Cul de Sac
Desirable Acceptable
194 150 feet 74 -89
89
100 feet
75
80
feet
66
60
39
24
feet
20
10
66
60 feet radius
66
100 feet
9-of e e t
70 feet
feet
40 feet
met
f eet
60 ft. radius
Where existing or anticipated traffic on principal and minor
arterial highways warrants greater widths of rights -of -way, these
shall be required.
5.40 MINIMUM PAVEMENT WIDTHS AND SURFACE TYPE: The following
requirements are applicable to all subdivisions with the jurisdic-
tion of the Commission.
5.41 Pavement widths for arterial and collector streets will be as
designated in the Transportation Plan. Where required to be pro-
vided as part of the subdivision, the subdivider will be responsible
for thirty -three f33j thirty -seven (37) feet. The difference, if
any, between the cost of the portion to be provided at the expense
of the subdivider including the cost of curb and gutter, if any, and
that of the total width designated in the Transporation Plan shall
be borne by the City of Hutchinson, the County of McLeod or by the
13
Minnesota H4ghway Department of Transportation where applicable,
unless it is determined by the City Council that such greater width
will benefit the subdivider in proportion to its cost.
5.42 Local streets and dead end streets shall have minimum widths of
thirty -three f331 thirty -seven (37) feet. Where curb and gutter is
required the total width, face t face back -to -back of curb, shall be
thirty -three f33} thirty -seven (37) feet. The pavement of a turning
circle at the end of a dead en "street shall have a minimum paved
outside diameter of fifty fifty- three -(53) feet to back of curb.
5.43 Alleys shall have minimum paved widths of twenty (20) feet.
5.44 Alleys, where permitted, will be constructed with a concrete
pavement of a minimum thickness of six (6) inches or of asphaltic
concrete of a minimum thickness of two f2� four 4 inches mat and
e4ght f8i ten (10) inches base. This requirement may be varied by
the City Council if, in their opinion, the requirement imposes two
severe a restriction when related to the projected use of the alley.
5.45 The subdivider shall grade all streets from property line to
property line prior to installation of water and sewer facilities.
Centerline street grades are to be established by the subdivider
subject to aproval of the City Engineer.
5.46 The subdivider shall, after grading streets and after, sanitar sewer,
storm sewer and watermains are in, construct a minimum OF a six
in,F-compacted gravel street 24 37 feet in width. The grading and
graveling of the street includes installation of culverts necessary
for over the ground drainage until curb and gutter is installed.
5.47 Streets shall be graded full width and fully constructed with a
concrete pavement of a minimum thickness of six (6) inches or of
asphaltic concrete of a minimum thickness of two f2i four 4 inches
mat and e4ght f8l ten (10) inches base, or of a construction stan-
dard and material approved by the City Engineer, in writing. If the
classification of the street justifies the construction of a thicker
section, the additional cost thereof shall be borne by the City of
Hutchinson, the County of McLeod or the Minnesota H4ghway Depart-
ment of Transportation depending upon the agency having jurisdiction.
5.48 The subdivider shall within one year provide for the construction of
curb and gutter within the confines of the platted area provided,
however, the City Council may extend this period where unusual
drainage problems exist and the drainage cannot be installed prior
to or with the curb and gutter construction, as outlined in a
subdivision agreement.
5.49 The subdivider shall within two ey ars rp ovide for the construction of
the street surface within the confines of the atte 3 area proviFecG.7-
wever, the City Council may extend this erp iod, as outlined in the
subdivision agreement.
5.50 STREET GRADE, CURVES AND SIGN DISTANCES: The following requirements
are applicable to all subdivisions within the City of Hutchinson:
5.51 The grades of any street or alley shall not be less than four - tenths
(0.4) percent. Where specifically approved by the City Engineer,
14
•
•
01
alleys may be designed with a 0.25 grade when constructed with
concrete pavement.
5.52 STREET GRADES: The grades in all streets, arterial highways,
collector streets, minor streets and alleys in any subdivision shall
not be greater than the maximum grades for each classification as
follows:
Prinicpal Arterial Highway 6 percent
Minor Arterial Highway 6 percent
Collector Street 6 percent
Local Street 8 percent
Alley 8 percent
Pedestrian Way 20 percent (may be increased if
steps of an acceptable design are
provided)
5.53 A11 changes in street grade of one (1) percent or more shall be
connected by vertical cruves. The length of the vertical curve will
be determined on the basis of providing stop sign distances for
each road classification where design speed for arterial and collector
streets is forty (40) mph and local streets is twenty -five (25) mph.
In no case shall the length of the required vertical curve be less
than fifteen (15) times the algebraic difference in rate of grades
for arterial and collector streets or one -half (1/2) of this minimum
for all other street.
5.54
The radius of curvature on the center line of the street shall not be
less than that required to produce stop sign distance as defined
in Section 5.53 above. In no case, however, shall the radius of
curvature for arterial and collector streets be less than three
hundred (300) feet or for local streets, service drives and alleys
be less than one hundred (100) feet.
5.60
INTERSECTIONS: The following requirements are applicable to all
subdivisions within the City of Hutchinson:
5.61
At a street intersection, the street curb intersection shall be
rounded by a radius of at least fifteen (15) feet.
5.62
Where, in the opinion of the Engineer, the center line profiles of
streets presented as part of the Preliminary Plat do not clearly
indicate that adequate intersection design will be accomplished, the
Commission may request an intersection detail at a scale not to exceed
one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet, which detail will clearly
represent the construction details for said intersection.
5.63
Intersections shall be designed so as to avoid abrupt changes in
longitudinal or transverse slope.
5.70
LOTS: The following requirements are applicable to all subdivisions
within the City of Hutchinson:
5.71
The size, shape, and orientation of lots shall be appropriate for the
location of the proposed subdivision and for the type of development
contemplated. Lot dimensions shall conform to the requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance.
15
5.72 Excessive depth in relation to widths shall be avoided. A proportion
of not more than (3) to one (1) normally shall be considered
appropriate.
5.73 Every lot shall abut on a street. Lots for residential purposes
shall meet the size requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and also the
requirements relative to building setback and side yard requirements.
5.74 Corner lots for residential use 'sha 1 1 be platted at least five (5)
feet wider than interior lots in order to permit conformance with the
setback required by the Zoning Ordinance and also the requirements
relative to building setback and side yard requirements.
5.75 Residential lots fronting on arterial and collector streets should
have extra depths to permit deep setbacks for the buildings.
5.76 Double frontage lots and reversed frontage lots shall not be platted
except as hereinbefore permitted under Section 5.20.
5.77 Side lot lines shall be approximately at right angles to the right -
of -way line of the street on which the lot fronts.
5.78 Narrow, triangular lots, unusual shapes, and lots not permitting at
least-a 26 foot width house with side yards and driveway, rear yards
and front yards are prohibited. No plat will be accepted that
contains lots undesirable for building, property subject to recurrent
flooding, property at grades greater than 8 percent or other factors
that may cause such properties to be mariginal in building operations
and cause such property to be returned for property taxes.
5.80 UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE: The following requirements are applicable to
all subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the City. #0
5.81 WATER LINES: Where an approved public water supply is within
reasonable access to the subdivision as determined by the number of
lots, distance from and capacity of existing mains, water lines shall
be placed within the right-of -way of each street. Water lines shall
have a minimum diameter of 6 ". Fire hydrants shall be installed at
intervals of not less than four hundred (400) feet. The minimum size
water main shall be 6" in diameter and all water mains shall be
looped so that water is available from two directions to any point.
Water main, fire hydrants, gate valves and appurtenances shall be
installed in accordance with acceptable engineering practice. Each
lot shall be provided with a connection to the watermain. In
general, in new residential areas water main services with a shutoff
shall be installed to appropriate public recreational areas with the
water main construction.
5.82 SANITARY SEWERS: Sanitary sewers shall be constructed in accordance
with a connection to a sanitary sewer. The City may accept an area
for platting where such service cannot be provided when the lots are
of sufficient size and the soil is suitable for private systems in
accordance with City and State Health Department recommendations. No
such private disposal systems shall be interconnected or run to a
common private or public drain. The minimum size public sanitary
sewer shall be eight (8) inches in diameter. In general in new
residential areas sanitary sewer services shall be installed to
appropriate public recreational areas with the sewer construction.
16
MI
Sewage lift stations will be constructed if necessary to serve an
area, provided a lift station will be constructed on an assessment
basis. to serve an area en4y if at 4east 59 pereent of the cost is
4mmed47ate4y assessab4e. The lift station cost beyond the 59 pereent
and pre -rata area immediately assessable will be held for future
assessment to the future area to be served.
5.83 STORM DRAINAGE: All necessary facilities including underground pipe,
manholes, inlets, catch basins and other appurtenances necessary to
provide adequate drainage for the property or to maintain any natural
drainage course shall be the responsibility of the developer.
Open drainage ditches will not be allowed unless specifically
directed by the City Engineer.
Platting of property is prohibited unless it is possible to drain the
property by gravity drainage to the natural drainage course for the
area. At a minimum no property plat will be accepted unless street
grades are at least five feet above lake elevation so as to drain into
the streets. The meeting of this requirement does not obligate the
City Council to accept the plat if there are substantial
obstructions to the drainage of the property contained therein and
the City Council may require that the subdivider install pumping
facilities for storm drainage prior to plat acceptance if such
facilities are necessary.
5.84 EXTENSIONS NOT IN-PLATTED AREA: In some cases, the proposed area to
be platted will not be served at its borders by water mains or
sanitary sewer. The City Council may require a petition for the
creation of an assessment district to extend the facilities to the
platted area; or may require the subdivider to pay the cost of such
extension; or may accept the plat with a separate water or sewer
system; or may pay the cost thereof and hold the amount for future
assessment; or may refuse acceptance of the plat.
5.85 BUILDING PERMIT: No building permit shall be issued in the platted
area until sewer and water mains are designed, approved and the
contract for installlation awarded with a satisfactory completion
date. No building shall be occupied in the platted area until
provided with sanitary sewer and water service and until the street
is graveled and such graveling accepted as adequate by the City
Engineer to serve the building. The occupancy of a building in
violation of this section shall not relieve the subdivider of any
responsibility for street improvement. The transfer of property in
the plat from the original subidvider to other parties shall not
relieve the subdivider of his responsibility for initial street work
as defined herein.
5.86 DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENTS: The City Engineer will design only the
improvements to be installed by the City. A subdivider desiring to
contract and install his own improvements shall de se 4m aceerdanee
with City spee4f4cat 4ens and praet4ee: The City Engineer w444
approve or disapprove a44 p4ams; spee4f4eat4ens and 4nsta44at4en 4m
the pab44c street; and far 4mprerements have plans and specifica-
tions prepared by a Minnesota Re istered Engineer, which have been
approved the Cit Engineer an State Agencies before construe ion
b
begins. street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and watermain improve-
17
ments installed by the subdivider shall be inspected by the City
Engineer and the Engineer shall furnish a written statement to the
subdivider of City acceptance of said utilit improvements or street
as part of the City system. An correc ions o the improvements
found necessar by the City Engineer shall e done 5—y—a—nd at the expense
of the subdivider before sai accep ance is made. to
5.90 OTHER REQUIREMENTS: The following requirements are applicable to a 1 1
subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the City of Hutchinson.
5.91 SIDEWALKS: Sidewalks at least five (5) feet wide, constructed of
concrete pavement with a minimum thickness of four (4) inches shall .
be constructed on both sides of every street where the average width
of lots is less than sixty (60) feet. Sidewalks shall be constructed
on one or both sides of streets irrespective of the width of lots
where, in the opinion of the Commission, these are necessary to
protect the safety of pedestrians.
5.92 DRIVEWAYS: The subdivider shall install driveways, driveway
approaches and curb returns for each connection to the street.
5.93 SCREEN PLANTING: The installation of trees and shrubs to form a
tight screen effective at all times shall be required along the rear
line of any lot in the subdivision which backs onto an arterial or
collector street.
5.94 STREET NAMES: A 1 1 streets are to be named. A proposed street which
is in alignment with and which joins an existing and named street
shall be given the name of the existing street. The name of a
proposed street shall not duplicate the name of an existing street to
which it does not connect or with which it is not in alignment. 06
5.95 STREET NAME SIGNS: Ref lectorized street name signs shall be provided
at all street intersections or where a change of direction of a
street requires a change of street name. The signs shall be of the
size and type approved for use by the City of Hutchinson. Normally,
one sign will be required at each residential intersection; however,
more may be required dependent upon the character and /or width of the
streets.
5.96 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS: An agreement shall be executed by the subdivider
and the City before any plat is executed the City. Said agreement
shal 1 b recorded bDY the subdivider in the office of the County
Recorder withiin 3Udays of final approval:
5.97 EASEMENTS:
5.971 An easement for utilities, at least six (6) feet wide, shall be
provided along each side of a side line of lots and /or the rear line
of lots where necessary to form a continuous right -of -way, at least
twelve (12) feet in width. Such easements to be dedicated and
provide for utility service from street to street. The intent of
such easements is to furnish overhead wore utility service from the
rear of the lots to buildings. If necessary for the extension of
main water or sewer lines, electrical transformer pads or similar
utilities, easements of greater width may be required along lot lines of
or across lots. Utility easements of at least ten (10) percent in
width shall be provided along the front lot lines adjacent to street
18
right -of -way.
5.972 Utility easements shall connect with easements established in
adjoining properties. These easements, when approved, shall not
thereafter be changed without the approval of the City Council, by
Ordinance, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
5.973 Additional easements for pole guys should be provided at the
outside of turns. Where possible, lot lines shall be arranged to
bisect the exterior angle so that poles guys will fall along side
lot lines.
5.974 Where a subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainage way,
channel or stream, a storm water easement, drainage right -of -way or
park dedication, whichever the Planning Commission may deem the
most adequate, conforming substantially with the lines of such
water course shall be provided, together with such further width or
construction, or both, as will be adequate for the storm water
drainage of the area. The width of such easements shall be
determined by the Planning Commission.
5.98 PUBLIC UTILITIES:
5.981 All new electric distribution lines (excluding main line feeders
and high voltage transmission lines), telephone service lines,
Cable TV, and services constructed within the confines of and
providing service to customers in a newly platted residential area
shall be buried underground; unless the council specifically shall
find, after study and recommendation by the Planning Commission,
that:
a. The placing of utilities underground would not be compatible
with the development planned;
b. The additional cost of burying such utilities would create an
undue financial hardship; or
c. Topographical, soil or any other conditions make the
underground installation unreasonable or impractical.
5.982 All utility lines for telephone and electrical service shall be
placed in rear line easements when carried on overhead poles. The
Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council require,
that the type of overhead pole used, be of a quality and durability
aesthetically in conformance with the nature of the residential
development.
5.983 Where telephone, electric and /or gas service lines are to be placed
underground entirely, conduits or cables shall be placed within
easements or dedicated public ways in such a manner so as not to
conflict with other underground services.
5.984 All drainage and other underground utility installations which
traverse privately owned property shall be protected by easements.
5.985 The subdivider is responsible for complying with the requirements
of this SECTION, and shall submit to the Planning Commission a
written record from the utilities showing that the necessary
arrangements with the utility involved for the installation of said
facilities have been made.
19
6.00 MODIFICATION AND EXCEPTIONS:
6.10 MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS: The general principles of design and minimum
requirements for the layout of subdivisions set forth in Section
5.00 may be varied by the City Council in the case of a subdivision
large enough to constitute a more or less self- contained neighborhood
which is to be developed in accordance with a comprehensive plan
safeguarded by appropriate restrictions, and which, in the judgment
of the City Council, makes adequate provision for all essential
community requirements, provided, however, that no modification shall
be granted by the Council which would conflict with the proposals of
the official Map or with the other features of the Comprehensive Plan
of Hutchinson, or with the intent and purposes of said general
priniciples of design and minimum requirements.
6.20 SMALL SUBDIVISION: In the case of a subdivision of small size and
minor importance, situated in a locality where conditions are well -
defined, and containing not more than four lots fronting on an
existing street not involving any new street or road or the extension
of municipal facilities and not adversely affecting the adjoining
property, the Council may exempt the subdivider from complying with
some or all of the requirements stipulated in Section 3.00 pertaining
to the preparation of the Preliminary Plat.
6.30 UNUSUAL PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: In any particular case where the
subdivider can show that, by reason of exceptional topographic or
other physi -cal conditions, strict compliance with any requirement of
this ordinance would cause unusual difficulty or exceptional and
undue hardship, the City Council may relax such requirement to the
extent deemed just and proper, so as to relieve such difficulty and
undue hardship, provided that such relief may be granted without
detriment to the public good and without impairing the intent and
purposes of these regulations or the desirable general development of
the neighborhood and the community in accordance with the Comprehen-
sive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Hutchinson. Any
modification thus granted shall be entered in the minutes of the City
Council setting forth the reasons which, in the opinion of the
Council, justified the modification.
7.00 ENFORCEMENT: No plat of any subdivision shall be entitled to be recorded
in the office of the Register of Beeds County Recorder or shall have any
validity until it has been approved by the City Council in the manner
described herein.
It shall be unlawful for the owner or the agent of the owner to transfer
or sell any land by reference to or by other use of a plat or description
unless the plat has been approved by the Council as required herein.
8.00 PENALTY: Anyone violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall
be guiTlty of a misdemeanor which is punishable by a fine of not more than
three hundred (300) dollars and /or by a commitment to jail for a period
not to exceed ninety (90) days. Each day during which compliance is
delayed shall constitute a separate offense.
M
20
•
•
N
9.00 SCHEDULE OF FEES CHARGES AND EXPENSES: The schedule of fees shall be
available at tVe City Offir—ces aFTmay be altered or amended only by the
City Council. No plat shall be reviewed until al 1 fees have been paid in
full.
10.00 SEPARABILITY: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of
this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or void,
said division shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of
this ordinance.
11.00 REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCE: Al ordinances of the City of
Hutchinson, a amen dmentWe—reof or supplementary thereto, and all
other ordinances of the City inconsistent herewith and to the extent of
such inconsistency and no further, are hereby repealed.
12.00 VARIANCES: The City Council may grant a variance from these regulations
following a finding that all of the following conditions exist:
12.01 There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said
property such that the strict application of the provisions of this
Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his
land.
12.02 The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the petitioner.
12.03 The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which
said property is situated.
In making this finding, the Council shall consider the nature of
the porposed use of land and the existing use of land in the
vicinity, the number of persons to reside or work in the proposed
subdivision and the probable effect of the proposed subdivision
upon traffic conditions in the vicinity. In granting a variance as
herein provided, the Council shall prescribe only conditions that
it deems desirable or necessary to the public interest.
13.10 SPECIAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Application for any such variance shall
be made in writing by the subdivider at the time when the preliminary plat
is filed for the consideration of the Planning Commission and City Council,
stating fully and clearly all facts relied upon by the petitioner, and
shall be supplemented with maps, plans or other additional data which may
aid the Planning Commission and City Council in the analysis of the proposed
project. The plans for such development shall include such covenants,
restrictions or other legal provisions necessary to guarantee the full
achievement of the plan.
In all cases where applications for variance are submitted for conditional
approval along with the preliminary plat, the action on such conditional
approval shall issue from the City Council.
21
Introduced and read the first time 1- 28 -75.
Read the second time and passed 2- 11 -75.
Filed and attested
Thomas E. Mealy, City Clerk
Revised November 26, 1985.
22
Black, ayor
n
•
7-Aj
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8168
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Data Set & Micro Multi
1,719.28
Tune Up
Street
Yes
GTC
plexor
4,170.0
Data Communication to
Recreation Building
Rec. AdA
Yes
LOGIS
Diesel Oil
2,108.0
Operations
Street
Yes
Schmeling Oil Co.
Water Meters
5,502.9
Sale & Replacement
Water
Yes
Water Products
VThe following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Diesel Engine Tune -Up
1,719.28
Tune Up
Street
Yes
GTC
Date Approved:
4*0 tion made by:
Seconded by:
December 10, 1985
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
•
Fund.
RESOLUTION NO. 8169
TRANSFERRING $45,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT, $45,000 is hereby transferred by the Liquor Store to the General
Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of December, 1985.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
�-)E'
Resolution No. 8164
• RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Northwoods Avenue from Spruce Street
to East Termini by the construction of Surfacing and Appurtenances, and to
assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
That the liroposed improvement be referred to Marlow V. Priebe, Director of
Engineering, for study and that he is instructed to report to the council with
all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether
the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made
as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated
cost of the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the council this 10th day of December, 1985.
•
Clerk
ft
Mayor
q-1,
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 6, 1985
TO: Mayor & City Council --------------- - - --
FROM: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Projected Cost Of Wage Adjustment
Cost of a wage adjustment for the general fund would be as follows:
(Cost includes wages and PERA /FICA costs.}
1% _ $16,045
3% = 48,135
3.5% = 561158
4% = 64,180
Our contingency amount for 1986 is $131,259. We did not do a breakdown
of this amount for 1986 (i.e., wages and other).
Cost of a wage adjustment for the enterprises funds, again wages and
PERA /FICA are included, would be:
1% _ $ 2,888
3% = 8,664
3.5% = 10,108
4% = 11,552
/ms n
•
A
w
612}587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
December 10, 1.985 _
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL +.
FROM: HAZEL SITZ, PER.SCNNEL COORD33�1ATOR
RE: I'T'EMS OF PERSaZM FOR CONSIDERATION
Matters for consideratiaz Linder 9-b:
1. Merit review - to be dame by department heads - as per their
recamtiendation in November 27 memo (COPY attached) .
2. General wage adjustment - cptieais suggested in my December 2 memo
(copy of mew ate, along with tte additional -salary information
requested)
***It is emphasized again that adjustments need to maintain the integrity
of the pay plan we adopted in January of this year to comply with
the comparable worth law; that is, the intervals between pay grades
should remain constant. (Review options a and b.)
3. Christmas Eve closing - each year a decision must be made on how
to handle 'the Christmas Eve closing time for city hall. In the
past, sane councils have granted an extra holiday at this season.
With Christmas being in midweek the situation may be somewhat
different -this year.
Stores us
vially close early on December 24. City hall should primly
follow this pattern. It is recantended -that city hall close at
3 or 4 p.m. on Christmas Eve. Fimplcyees of different departments
who must work later in the day should receive an equal amount of
time off Cthat is, one or two hours) at another time.
(The council may want to delegate responsibility for this Christmas
Eve closing decision to the city administrator; if so, the item
could be added to the new policy book.)
t
r
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 27, 1985
MEMO RAN40UM
TU: MAYOR AMID CITY COUNMIL
• a • i� n • • • • ia�• • � w is • - �•�+a�� -
It is our recommendation that consideration for merit increases for
all employees (except police officers, who are ., eaz a longevity system)
be changed from January 1 to each employee's 'individual anniversary
date, and that this be incorporated into the pay plan resolution
which will be adopted for 1986.
Directors review the performance of their employees as they grow into
their jobs, and using anniversary dates as the perfammance review time
is a logical way of dealing with each empolcyeeIs individual situation.
Employees are hired at entry level pay and have a right to expect to
advance to higher levels in their assigned pay grades as they became
more proficient in their performance. The supervisor, who has first
hand knowledge of the quality of performance of his/her employees, should
have the responsibility an8 the authority to see that each employee's
work is fairly cmpensated through this merit system.
(It is recommended that merit review for employees with 5 years or less
of service be made now (December, 1985) in order to bring these employees
into line with the pay equity principles established in the 1985 pay plan.- -�'
Thereafter, individual anniversary dates would be used for them also.)
It is our belief that merit consideration should be kept corpletely
separate from the council consideration for general wage adjustment which
is doze in December each year. Doing them during the same month makes
it too easy to confuse the processes, which are not related.
(612) 587 -5151
f1UTlH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
Decenber 2, 1985
MEMORAN -DUM
TO: MAYOR AMID CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PERSONNEL COORDINATOR HAZEL SITZ �^
RE: OPTIONS FOR GENERAL GCE ADJUS TENT
The Council requested recommended procedures for year -end salary changes.
1. It is recommended that consideration for merit increases be kept
Is ate from the year end general (cost of living) adjustment.
s the .co=mus of department heads. See the memo on that
subject in this packet.
2. The January 1 general adjustment takes into account inflation
for the past 12 months. Any such adjustment should not change
the structure of our pay system but must maintain the integrity
of the — in—` t als between grades. In our present.pay plan, the
midpoint, or 100 percent level, is the base for - figuring percentage'
changes. Several options for general adjustments follow.
a. The general adjustment for each pay grade would be X percent
of its midpoint. Each individual in that pay grade would receive
a given number of cants per hour, regardless of his/her
present hourly rate. Each pay grade moves by the same percentage. Ex:
Grade VII midpoint is $8.31 times 4% = $.33/hr
. every mpicyee in Grade VII receives $.33,
whether present rate is-:more or less than $8.31.
Grade XII/ midpoint is $12.77 times ~ =4% = $.51/hr
(SAL';rF) . every employee in Grade XII receives $.51,
whether oresent rate is more or less than $12.77
b. Same as (a) above, and each pay grade moves by the same percentage
except make the limitation that no employee would receive an
increase larger than that given to Grade D (or another Grade of
the Council's choosing). This would serve to level off the
larger increases, if that is the Council's desire.
c. Do not adjust the pay grades by a percentage for 1986; rather
use the same table for another year. Allow an adjustment based
on the midpoint of each pay grade. This method would have the
effect.of freezing the salary of any individual who is presently
at the top of an assigned pay grade. (2 such situations exist.)
It would also cause so m? problems with the police longevity schedule..
I believe (a) or (b) above are the most workable methods of dealing
with the general adjustment.
(:b
r
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON:
That the following table is hereby adopted as the City Position Classification
Assignment Table, to be reviewed form time to time, assigning the various positions
in the Position Classification Plan to the appropriate pay grades in the table.
POSITION CLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT TABLE
PAY GRADE JOB TITLE
I -
II General Laborer
III Transit Dispatcher
IV Receptionist /Cashier
V Bus Driver
Custodian /Boiler Operator
Liquor Store Clerk
Park /Street Maint., General
VI Motor V hi le Clem
Commune. y �ervice fficer
Secretary, Parks /Recreation
Secretary, Planning Commission
Secretary, Police
Water Account Technician
VII Engineering Technician I
Personnel /Insurance Technician
Police Dispatcher
Secretary, Engineer /Building /Fire
Wastewater Maintenance Technician
Water Maintenance Technician
VIII Administrative'Secretary
Finance Technician
Motor Vehicle Deputy Registrar
IX Cemetery Maintenance Supervisor
Engineering Technician II
Equipment Mechanic
Park /Arena Maintenance Operator
Street Equipment Operator
(I)SALARIED Recreation /Sr. Center Supervisor
X Chief Water Plant Operator
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Police Patrol Officer
Street Maintenance Supervisor
Wastewater Plant Operator
(H)SALARIED Forester
XI Chief Wastewater Plant Operator
Motor Pool Supervisor /Asst. Dir. Mtc
(G)SALARIED Assistant Recreation Director
Assistant Building Inspector
Civic Arena Manager
Personnel /Transit Coordinator
PAYS DE JOB TITLE
XII Assistant to City Engineer
( F) SALARIED Building Official
Fire Marshal
Liquor Store Manager
Police Sergeant
Police Investigator
(E)SALARIED -
(D)SALARIED Director of Maintenance
Director of Parks /Recreation
(C)SALARIED Director of Finance
Chief of Police
(B)SALARIED Director of-Engineering
(A)SALARIED City Administrator
TEMPORARY, SEASONAL, PART TIME
Nos't .individual positions assigned to
Grades T1, T2, T3, T4, and I, II, III,
depending on responsibilities.
Regular Part Time Positions:
T4 Parking Enforcement Offic&
.I Liquor Store Clerk
iI Motor Vehicle Clerk
III Police Dispatcher
Senior Center. Activi -ties Super.
.V Licensed Police Officer
(3 of 4)
0
s
r(612) 587 -5151
C/T Y OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
December 10, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PERSCNNEL C00RDINATOR
I' H � w ICI 1 I • '� I� •�
Attached is information, as requested, shaming 1985 annual wags of each
full time city employee, and the impact that adjustments of 3 %, 3.5% and
4% respectively would have on those waqes.
In addition, following is a table showing the.inpact of similar increases
based on the midpoint of each pay grade. You will recall that it was my
recom- endaticn that increases be based on the midpoint rather than on
actual wages in order to provide more equal treatment to each employee in a 'pay grade.
GRADE 1 1985 1 + 3% 1 + 3.5% + 4%
I
II
III
IV
V
V1
VII
VIII
IX (I )
X (H)
XI (G)
XII (F)
(E)
(_D)
(C)
(B)
(A)
5.39
5.79
6.21
6.70
7.20
7.74
8.31
8.94
9.60
10.56
11.61
12.77
14.04
15.44
16.98
18.68
20.54
�/hr $ /yam
.16
333
.17
354-
.19
395
.20
416
.22
458
.23
478
.25
520
.27
562
.29
603
.32
666
.35
728
.38
790
.42
873
.46
957
.51
1061
.56
1165
.62
1290
.19
.20
.22
.23
.25
.27
.29
.31
.34
.37
.41
.45.
.49
.54
.59
.65
.72
395
416
458
478
520
562
603
645
707
770
853
936
1019
1123
1227
1352
1498
�/hr $1year
.22
458
.23
478
.25
520
.27
562
.29
603
.31
645
.33
686
.36
749
.38
790
.42
874
.46
957
.51
1061
.56
llb5
.62
1290
.68
1414
.75
1560
.82
1706
(Job classes in each pay grade are shown on the back of this page.)
.1
•
Z
GENERAL FINE) ONLY
ttttt BROSS USES REFLECTS ONLY HOURLY RATE
AT NORMAL HOURS - OVERTIME NOT FACTORED ttttttt
NAME NUMBER OF GROSS
H'RS MORK WAGES WAGE
ADJUST.
31
LINK
K
2080.00
15537.60
466.13
PLOTZ
S.
2080.00
43576.00
1307.28
STII
H.
1115.00
20820.75
624.62
SWANSON
N.
2080.00
18844.80
565.34
MERRILL
K.
2060.00
35776.00
1073.26
BAUHETZ
B.
1040.00
6344.00
190.32
SWANSON
D.
1040.00
6281.60
188.45
RUNKE
J.
2080.00
17513.60
525.41
TABBERSON R.
2080.00
18595.20
557.86
LIPKE
M.
1200.00
6660.00
199.80
SCHUMAN
C
800.00
4168.00
125.04
SMITH
D.
2080.00
16681.60
500.45
TORRY
E.
2080.00
18595.20
557.86
FORCIER P. 2060.00 14892.80 446.76
ERLANDSON D.
GREGOR J.
HAASL J.
H06AN M.
JONES C.
KIRCHOFF N.
KIRCHOFF R.
MATTSFIELD W.
O'BORSKY D.
RINGSTROM R.
SCHWARTZ S.
UWE R.
WEBB S.
WEGNER M.
Bliss N.
BENTZ M.
GRAY J.
LA1EN M.
THURN M.
BAKKEN R.
BELL C.
2080.00 23275.20 698.26
2080.00 28995.20 869.86
2080.00 23961.60 718.65
2080.00 23961.60 718.85
2080.00 23504.00 705.12
2080.00 24211.20 726.34
2080.00 28995.20 869.86
2080.00 23732.80 711.98
2080.00 40580.80 1217.42
2080.00 23504.00 705.12
2080.00 28995.20 869.86
2080.00 28995.20 869.86
2080.00 23275.20 698.26
2080.00 24211.20 726.34
2080.00 16931.20 507.94
2080.00 17284.80 516.54
2080.00 16411.20 492.34
2080.00 15558.40 466.75
2080.00 17284.80 518.54
2080.00 17118.40 513.55
1560.00 8361.60 250.85
GROSS
WAS VASE
WITH 31 ADJUST.
3.51
16003.73 543.82
44883.28 1525.16
21445.37 726.73
19410.14 659.57
36849.28 1252.16
6534.32 222.04
6470.05 219.86
18039.01 612.98
19153.06 650.63
6859.80 233.10
4293.04 145.86
17162.05 583.86
19153.06 650.83
15339.58 521.25
23973.46 814.63
29865.06 1014.83
24680.45 838.66
24680.45 638.66
24209.12 822.64
24937.54 847.39
29865.06 1014.83
24444.78 830.65
41796.22 1420.33
24209.12 622.64
29865.06 1014.83
29865.06 1014.83
23973.46 814.63
24937.54 847.39
17439.14 592.59
17803.34 604.97
16903.54 574.39
16025.15 544.54
17803.34 604.97
17631.95 599.14
8612.45 292.66
BROSS
MACES VASE
WITH 3.51 ADJUST.
41
16081.42 621.50
45101.16 1743.04
21549:48 832.83
19504.37 753.79
37028.16 1431.04
6566.04 253.76
6501.46 251.26
18126.58 700.54
19246.03 743.81
6893.10 266.40
4313.86 166.72
17265.46 667.26
19246.03 743.81
15414.05 595.71
240B933 931.01
30010.03 1159.81
24800.26 958.46
24800.26 95B.46
24326.64 940.16
25058.59 968.45
30010.03 115931
24563.45 949.31
42001.13 1623.23
24326.64 940.16
30010.03 1159.81
30010.03 1159.81
24089.83 931.01
25056.59 968.45
17523.79 677.25
17BB9.77 691.39
16985.59 656.45
16102.94 622.34
17889.71 691.39
17717.54 684.74
8654.26 334.46
GROSS
WAGES
WITH 4 2
16159.10
45319.04
21653.58
19598.59
37207.04
6597.76
6532.86
16214.14
19339.01
6926.40
4334.72
17348.86
19339.01
15488.51
24206.21
30155.01
24920.06
24920.06
24444.16
25179.65
30155.01
24682.11
42204.03
24444.16
30155.01
3015`1.01
24206.21
25179.65
17608.45
17976.19
17067.65
16180.74
17976.19
17803.14
8696.06
NAME
PITTMAN H.
MARKA J.
FIELD 6.
HUHN L.
LARSON Q.
PRIEBE M.
RICE C.
VANDER VEEN P.
ALSLEBEN E.
BAASEN E.
BARKEIN E.
DASCHER D.
KARS L.
MEIER D.
PAULSEN C.
NEUMANN R.
HAUGEN B.
ERICSON 8.
N OKAY K.
HAU6EN B.
MCRAITH J.
HAUSEH N.
WEIS H.
BOELTER S.
IVERSON E.
LARSON N.
HAARSTAD E
PAULSEN C.
SCHN08RICH M.
VOSTINAR J.
WRIGHT N.
GROEHLER F.
LATIIG M.
JORGENSON A.
SCHMIDT B.
POWELL D.
KRUEGER G.
GENERAL FUND ONLY
ttttt GROSS WAGES REFLECTS
AT NORMAL HOURS -
NUMBER OF GROSS
H'RS WORK WAGES WAGE
ADJUST.
31
2080.00 26475.20 654.26
2080.00 21736.00 652.08
2060.00 26017.60 840.53
2080.00 17513.60 525.41
2080.00 21299.20 638.98
2080.00 41912.00 1257.36
2080.00 28995.20 869.86
0.00 0.00
2080.00 17534.40 526.03
2080.00 21299.20 638.98
2080.00 18969.60 569.09
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
2080.00 23420.80 702.62
1560.00 17191.20 515.74
2080.00 21299.20 638.98
1040.00 16317.60 489.53
0.00 0.00
1000.00 6000.00 180.00
2080.00 32510.40 975.31
2080.00 15766.40 472.99
2080.00 18969.60 569.09
2080.00 22921.60 687.65
2080.00 23649.60 709.49
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
2080.00 19966.00 599.04
2080.00 18969.60 569.09
2000.00 21964.80 65B.94
2080.00 21964.80 658.94
2080.00 18969.60 569.09
2080.00 13166.40 394.99
2080.00 19968.00 599.04
ONLY HOURLY RATE
OVERTIME NOT FACTORED ttttttt
GROSS
15246.40
GROSS
15703.79
WAGES
RAGE
WAGES
WAGE
WITH 31
ADJUST.
WITH 3.51
ADJUST.
533.62
3.51
609.86
41
29329.46
996.63
29471.63
1139.01
22388.06
760.76
22496.76
869.44
28658.13 980.62
16039.01 612.98
21938.18 745.47
43169.36 1466.92
29865.06 1014.83
0.00 0.00
16060.43 613.70
21938.18 745.47
19538.69 663.94
20567.04 698.88
20567.04 69838
24123.42 819.73
17706.94 601.69
21938.18 745.47
16807.13 571.12
0.00 0.00
6180.00 210.00
33485.71 1137.86
16239.39 551.82
19538.69 663.94
23609.25 802.26
24359.09 827.74
20567.04 698.68
20567.04 698.8B
20567.04 698.88
20567.04 696.88
19538.69 663.94
22623.74 766.77
22623.74 766.77
19538.69 663.94
13561.39 460.82
20567.04 698.88
28998.22 1120.70
18126.58 700.54
22044.67 851.97
43376.92 1676.46
30010.03 1159.61
0.00 0.00
16148.10 701.38
22044.67 851.97
19633.54 758.78
20666.88 798.72
20666.88 798.72
24240.53 936.83
17792.89 687.65
22044.67 851.97
16888.72 652.70
0.00 0.00
6210.00 240.00
3364B.26 1300.42
16316.22 630.66
19633.54 158.78
23723.86 91636
24477.34 945.98
20666.88 798.72
20666.88 798.72
20666.88 798.72
20666.88 148.72
19633.54 758.78
22733.57 878.59
22733.57 878.59
19633.54 758.78
13627.22 526.66
20666.88 798.72
GROSS
WAGES
WITH 4 1
29614.21
22605.44
29138.30
18214.14
22151.17
43588.48
30155.01
0.00
16235.76
22151.17
19728.38
20766.72
20766.72
24357.63
17878.85
22151.17
16970.30
0.00
6240.00
33810.82
16397.06
19728.38
23838.46
24595.58
20766.72
20766.72
20766.72
20766.72
19128.38
22843.39
22843.39
19728.38
13693.06
20766.72
2080.00
15246.40
457.39
15703.79
533.62
15780.02
60936
15856.26
2080.00
15246.40
457.39
15703.79
533.62
15180.02
609.86
15856.26
900.00
4752.00
142.56
4894.56
166.32
4918.32
190.08
4942.08
900.00
6480.00
194.40
6674.40
226.80
6706.80
259.20
6739.20
900.00
5589.00
167.67
5756.67
195.61
5784.61
223.56
5812.56
1,449,359 43480.78 19492,840.13 50721.58 11500,086.93 57974.37 1,507,333.72
•
l
40
LZI
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
ttttttt MARES ARE ONLY REGULAR TIME
OVERTIME NOT
INCLUDED tttttttt
NAME
NUMBER OF
BROSS
VASE
BROSS
MARE
GROSS
NNE
BROSS
H'RS WORK
VASES
ADJ.
WAGES'
ADJ.
VASES
ADJ.
WAGES
32
WITH 31
3.51
WITH 3.51
41
WITH 4.01
VITCHERMAN K.
2080.00
20300.80
609.02
20909.62
710.53
21011.33
612.03
21112.83
MEIER
D.
520.00
5730.40
171.91
5902.31
200.56
5930.96
229.22
5959.62
DEVRIES
R.
2080.00
24148.80
724.46
24873.26
845.21
24994.01
965.95
25114.75
MEECE
M.
2080.00
17284.80
516.54
17803.34
604.97
17889.77
691.39
17976.19
HEINKE
H.
2080.00
19760.00
592.60
20352.80
691.60
20451.60
790.40
20550.40
NAGY
R.
2080.00
21964.80
658.94
22623.74
768.77
22733.57
678.59
22843.39
EBERT
R.
2080.00
17513.60
525.41
18039.01
612.9B
18126.58
700.54
18214.14
NEUMANN
R.
1040.00
16317.60
4B9.53
16807.13
571.12
168BB.72
652.70
16970.30
OLSEN
D.
2080.00
16016.00
480.48
16496.48
560.56
16576.56
640.64
16656.64
BROTEN
D.
2080.00
16432.00
492.96
16924.96
575.12
17007.12
657.28
17089.28
NATHNEY
J.
2060.00
16432.00
492.96
16924.96
575.12
17007.12
657.2B
17089.28
NELSON
C.
2080.00
26561.60
796.85
27358.45
929.66
27491.26
1062.46
27624.06
KIRKHOFF
J.
1312.00
6966.72
209.00
7175.72
243.84
7210.56
278.67
7245.39
RUNKE
B.
2080.00
16432.00
492.96
16924.96
575.12
17007.12
657.28
17089.28
VORBECK
D.
2080.00
17388.80
521.66
17910.46
608.61
17997.41
695.55
18084.35
259249.92
7777.50
267,027.42
9,073.75
268,323.67
10,370.00
269,619.92
LZI
r 12) 587 -5151
TY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Bruce Ericson, Parks & Recreation-Director�
DATE: December 5, 1985
SUBJECT: Recommended Fee Schedule
The following schedule of fees for the New Recreation
Center have been recommended by the Building Committee and
__ the Parks & Recreation Board for your consideration
klm
t
W
SEASON SWIMMING PASS
Residents $20 Single
Non residents $25 Single
Open Swim $1.00 /day
Wading Pool $1.00 /day /adult
(child must be supervised)
RENTAL RATE HEOOMMATIONS
SWINNING LESSONS
$40 Family Residents $10,Children & Adult
($1.00 /lesson)
$50 Family
Non resident $15 Children & Adult
($1.50 /lesson)
OPEN GYM
$1 /Session for evening & weekend
$.50 /time for daytime
$1/hour /person for team Basketball
& Volleyball at predetermined times
Senior Citizens free daytime
POOL RENTAL -
$30/hour (lifeguards provided)
TENNIS COLT_ RENTAL
$8 /court /hour
FIELD HOUSE RENTAL _
$20 /hour for recreational purposes
Parks & Recreation Board approves rentals other than recreational purposes
SUMMER USAGE
The arena rental rates pertain to daily rentals, the arena must be rented before
the field house will be rented out for trade shows, etc.
Note: No charge for the Youth Basketball League
•
1
HIGH SCB0OL USAGE 09
Parks & Recreation Board recommends a committe from both the city and the school
meet to determine proper charges.
9- G.
f
L.J
t
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 5, 1985
TO: Mayor & City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Postage Machine And Scale Lease
------------------------ - - - - --
Our postage machine (over 10 years old) has been giving us more trouble,
and the maintenance people feel the time has come to replace this equip-
ment. A review of equipment shows only Pitney Bowes equipment available.
A request is made to purchase, under a lease purchase agreement, a replace-
ment postage machine. At the same time a scale which will automatically
compute postage cost was demonstrated, and staff believes a savings in
postage cost would result.
I would, therefore, request the Council authorize staff to enter into
a lease purchase arrangement for a Pitney Bowes postage machine and scale.
We do have money for this lease in the budget.
/ms
?-d'I
UoM 5-4 160
Pitney Bowes
m szo
c b
al, Ir m- ine..,
with RAIR
Pegeftlbr
$0 4Pitmy Bo"s
Pol,;TAM METER WCH W
ik I i
I
Iva,
Bring
into yo
Pitney
Mailin
Pbsla
the post office
ur office with the
Bowes Model 5460
g Machine and RMRS
ge Meter
Giving you tl�e speed, versatility and
reliability you need in a mailing system,
the Pitney Bowes Model 5460 Mailing
Machine and RMRS Postage Meter is
ideal for your office or shipping room.
You get all the benefits of metered mail
and more! Because this unique system
allows you to reset your postage meter
yourself in just 90 seconds... without
leaving your office.
It's as easy as 1 -2 -3. Whenever you
need more postage, you simply:
1'. Pick up your Touch -Tone a telephone.
2. Exchange data with the RMRS Data
Center, and...
3. Reset your postage meter with sin-
gle or multiple increments of $200 or
$2,000— whichever suits your needs.
What's is mores your paperwork and pay-
ments to the Postal Service are auto-
matically taken care of by the RMRS
system, once your account is set up. It's
a system of payment and resetting that
couldn't be more secure...that saves
you time and money by eliminating
meter downtime, lengthy trips to the
post office, and procurement of certified
checks for payment.
With the PB Model 5460, you can
meter - imprint, seal and stack your out-
going mail in one continuous operation.
Print postage from 10 to $9.99 and,
if desired, your meter ad. For your
oversized packages and envelopes,
gummed meter tape, wet or dry, is auto-
matically provided.
And the versatile Model 5460 quickly
changes from a mailing system to a
shipping system. Simply remove the
meter and attach a parcel register.
Designed to give you maximum,
dependability and durability, the Pitney
Bowes Model 5460 Malting Machine is
compact, easy to operate, and fits in
with any decor.
Specifications:
Overall Height: 85A" (219 mm)
Base Dimensions: 131/2" by 93/s" (343
mm by 238 mm)
Weight: 261bs. (11 kg) (without meter)
Finish: Off -white and Black
Our continuing product improvement
program may bring about changes in
specifications.
Just think of what
the nine benefits
of metered mail
can do for you
t. Postal consultation and service..
You get free, no- obligation counsel from
PB mailing professionals on any aspect
of mail /paper - handling procedures.
2. Postage convenience. Buy postage
without ever leaving your office and
print the exact amount of postage you
need — anytime. Save on trips to the
post office for stamps.
3. Automatic postage accounting.
Your meter keeps track of postage used
and on -hand, and the RMRS system
automatically takes care of your pay-
ments to the Postal Service, once your
account is set up.
4. Office efficiency. Meter- imprint, seat
and stack your mail in one operation
and give your employees added time to
do more important and productive work.
5. Improved office morale. Make
employees happier on the job by elimi-
nating tiresome wetting and sticking
of stamps and envelopes.
6. Package and large envelope capa-
bility. For a neat and dated, professiunal-
looking package, your meter will
produce gummed meter tapes for
the exact amount of postage you need.
T. Faster postal service. Because your
mail is already dated and canceled, it
moves through the post office faster and
often catches earlier trucks and planes.
B. Professional image. Your mail looks
neat, crisp, modern and business -
like... and that carries a message about
you and your organization.
9. Meter advertising. Use the free
advertising space on your outgoing
envelopes to create low- cost, high -
impact advertising campaigns. (Ask
your PB representative for details and a
frees hnnklet nn the seven benefits of
meter advertising.)
114
Pitney Bowes
Walnut and Pacific Sts-
Stamford, Conn. 06904
e:19?9 ?riney- BoweS. InC Printed in U.3 A An Equal Opportunity Empiroyer FORA AD 7343 OR 9631 E.
•
■
zip
One
Ode
The first 5 lib. electronic mailing scale that thinks like you do
Bright digital display, simple layout, and a touch - sensitive control parcel make the
EMS -5 an easy way to control and lower mailing costs.
The Pitney Bowes model EMS-5 is
an efficient and cost conscious electronic
mailing scale. The EMS-5 is pro-
grammed to think like you do: about
productivity, ease of use, budgets, and
performance. The EMS -5's electronic
precision means mail and parcels (up
to 5 lbs-) can be weighed quickly and
accurately. saving time and money.
Both the U.S. Postal SerNice and
independent research organizations
estimate that overstamping — apply-ing
extra postage because of misreadings
or on- the -line ueighings from mechan-
ical scales — accounts for 10-20'0' of
annual postage expenditures. The
EMS-5 eliminates overstamping. and
also saves with rate shopping. By
pressing a few keys, an operator can
instantly determine the most cost
effective method for an individual
parcel or at the start of a large
uniform mailing.
The keyboard of the microprocess-
or-driven EMS-5 is color coded for
ease of use by trained and inexperienced
operators alike. All USPS rates are
available on the EMS-5: First Class/
Priority Mail, Third and Fourth Class.
International .Air Letter. Express Mail,
Special Delivery, Return Receipt, Certi-
fied, Registered, and Insured- Informa-
tion for rate calculations is stored in a
PROM (Programmable Read Only
Memory) unit. When rates change, or
when you want to add additional rates
or services. simply insert a new
PROM (automatically sent when rates
change).
The EM -9-5's automatic zit) -tar
zone conversion feature is also run by
a PROM unit With zip -to -zone convey`
Sion, the time and error factor involved
in searching confusing zone charts is
eliminated. Numerical input of the first
part of a zip code produces the correct
Multiply mailing efficiency and savings with a model 5460 mailing machine and
model 6500 RMRS" postage meter
Rafe changes and additions are easy
with a Dre- programmett chip.
zone instantly, allowing you to be sure
of exact rate calculations- Hand
searching both zone and rate charts
and manual calculations are replaced
with the EMS-5's computer logic and
push- button operation.
The EMS-5 is designed to interface
with Pitney Bowes electronic mailing
machines and hostage meters. By
interfacing, the quick determination of
weight zone. sen-ice, and rate also
triggers the letter processing node or
paper tape printing for parcels, cutter
all mail processing time down to an
instant operation
The EMS-5 electronic mailing
scale means significant cost and time
'savings, offers control over mail
processing activities and expenditures,
and enables employees to concentrate
on other tasks. And it's available only
from Pitney Bowes, the world leader in
mailing systems for more than 50 years.
SPECIFICA 1 IONS
Power Source: 115v
Power Consumption:.`) amps
Dimensions: lo'ii "W x 14 "D x 414"H
For Rill information, contact
your focal Pitney Bowes office
or call toff-free:
1- 800 -MR BOWES
1400-672-69-37
Within Alaska 1 -907- 562 -2254
Hawaii 1 -808- 521-7453
;MLL
Pitney
-Bowes
+Naite. r H .% - oe4er. Jr. Drive
Stamlord Connecticut 05926- 07,.;,
1,IIA {mfr ir'I iJ , 11901,, P„rt,,;y, E'—: r i Ar': I f .e �r.:':.y F..pjnyP.f I'Wrn pI.P1!1,35 Cr_"'.
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 5, 1985
TO: Mayor & City Council --------------- - - --
FROM: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Floor Scrubber And Copy Machine— — — — — — — — — — — — —
During the 1986 budget nrenaration we discussed the need for a floor
scrubber to be shared between the Civic Arena and the new recreation
building. Our 1985 recreation building bude_et appears to have enough
money to make this purchase this year. The request would be to purchase
an Advance TRAL280 at a cost of $6.094.50 from Floor Care Supply Co.
We have received two quotes on this machine.
With Park & Recreation moving to the new facility, it is necessary for
a cony machine to be placed in their new offices. We have reviewed sev-
eral machines, but have not yet reached a decision. Because the Council
will not be meeting again this year, T would request authorization to
purchase a copy machine at a cost not to exceed $2,000. The money would
be available from the 1985 recreation building department. We will be
following the established purchasing guidelines.
/ms
q_ F
"I
R"League a
Minnesota Cities
x.d
!as Increment Financing Pr oject
October 31, 1985
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Ave. N.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Plotz:
1,b 67890,'
j
N
N
ELI Ln
$Y
Earlier this month we informed cities that the League of Minnesota Cities and the
Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials
( NAHRO) had joined together to support tax increment financing.
A program of analysis and representational activities was developed. This step was
taken in response to resolutions adopted by city officials who studied the possibilities
of legislative action by the legislature in 1986 and beyond. The Boards of Directors of
both the League and NAHRO reviewed the proposal and unanimously endorsed the program.
,The League / NAHRO committee retained the law firm of Holmes and Graven as a consultant.
Pursuant to this program cities have already received a questionnaire on tax increment
finance usage which will provide data for a comprehensive study.
City officials will recall that the League / NAHRO program is to be financed by voluntary
contributions from cities involved in tax increment finance. These contributions will
defray the direct costs of employing Holmes and Graven while the League would provide
staff and other services to the effort on behalf of the cities who will benefit from the
overall activity, but are not currently engaged in the use of tax increment finance.
This letter officially requests your financial contribution in accordance with the
enclosed invoice. Several alternatives were considered before establishing the
assessment formula. All cities which had tax increment districts in 1984 payable 1985
tax year are being asked to proportionally contribute to the cost of the program.
The two factors used are the total assessed value in tax increment districts and the
total assessed value of your city. Both of these factors have been adjusted by sales
ratio. Statewide totals for all cities using tax increment were established along with
each city's percent of that total. Half the cost of the project is assessed based on
each city's proportionate share of the total assessed value of the cities involved. The
factors used and the resulting assessments are noted in the attached list.
We sincerely hope that your city will comply with its voluntary assessment to help
preserve tax increment as a viable development tool financing in the future.
Sicerely, Sincerely,
Susan Edel Nancy Reeves
LMC President NAHRO President
9 -r
��1MOO�C�
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
183 University Ave. E. No. 3529
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 2274=
A! 0 SHIPPED TO
Mr ..._Gary Plotz
City Adfoinistrator
..37 Washington Ave. N.
Hutchinson, M 55350
FC)fz%164023RAP!;)FORP,!S.;,'i',
THANK YOU
40:1
s
44
V(4612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 5, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: 1986 Improvement Projects
The plans and specifications have been completed for Projects 86 -01, 86 -02
and 86 -03. They will bid in five (5) lettings, as shown on the attached
list.
It is recommended these plans and specifications be approved for a bid date
of January 21, 1986, as per the attached resolutions.
MVP /pv
attachments
,4�
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
PROJECT NO. 86 -01
Resolution No. 8165
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on July 23rd,
1985, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of:
First Avenue N.E. from Main Street to Hassan Street by construction of
curb and gutter, sidewalk, grading, gravel base, surfacing and
appurtenances;
Hassan Street from First Avenue N.E. to Fifth Avenue S.E. by construction
of curb and gutter, sidewalk, grading, gravel base, surfacing and
appurtenances;
First Avenue S.E. from Main Street to Hassan Street by grading, gravel
base, surfacing and appurtenances;
California Street from School Road to 1900' South and School Road from
California Street to County Road 12 by construction of surfacing and
appurtenances;
School Road from-Carolina Street to California Street by construction of
watermain, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter and
appurtenances;
and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The city clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an advertisement for bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at
2 :00 P.M. on January 21st, 1986, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the council this 10th day of December, 1985.
Mayor
Clerk
C
r"�
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
• PROJECT N0. 86 -02
Resolution No. 8166
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on September
10th, 1985, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of:
12" Watermain on T.H. 22 from Oakland Avenue to 1200' South;
McDonald Drive from School Road to 900' West by Grading, Gravel Base,
Surfacing and - Appurtenances;
Bradford Street in Orchard Park 1st Addition, Roberts Road, Sibley Drive
and Tyler Street in 4th Addition to Lakewood Terrace and Campbell Lane-in
Clark's 2nd Addition by Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances;
and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an Advertisement for Bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at
2 :00 P.M. on January 21st, 1986, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the council this 10th day of December, 1985.
Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
PROJECT NO. 86 -03 .
Resolution No. 8167
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on September
24th, 1985, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of:
T.H. 7 West Service Road from Les Rouba Parkway to 1040, East by
construction of Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Eighth Avenue N.W. from Colorado Street to 6001 East and Colorado Street
from Eighth Avenue N.W. to Country Club by construction of Sanitary
Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base and Appurtenances
Carolina Avenue from School Road to 1501 East by construction of Gravel
Base, Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances;
Civic Arena Parking Lot by Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter and
Appurtenances;
Jorgenson Street from Hassan Street to Sherwood St.;
Southview Drive and Southview Court from Linden Avenue to Sunset Street
and Sunset Street to Linden Avenue;
Selchow Avenue from Jorgenson Street to Jefferson Street;
Bradford Street from Century Avenue to 7001 North;
Randall Road from Bradford Street to Century Avenue;
Sunset Street from Linden Avenue to Southview Drive;
Sherwood Street from Jorgenson Street to Century Avenue;
Century Avenue from Sherwood Street to T.H. 15;
Third Avenue S.W. from Lynn Road to East Pishney Lane;
Larson Street from Roberts Road to Lewis Avenue and
Hassan Street from Oakland Avenue to Selchow Avenue
by the construction of Wearing Course Overlay and _Appurtenances;
City Parking Lot (Bretzke) by construction of Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper and in The Construction Bulletin, an Advertisement for Bids upon the
making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be
done, shall state that bids will be opened and considered by the council at
Resolution No. 8167
Page 2 `
2:00 P.M. on January 21st, 19869 in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid
bond or certified check payable- to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the council -this 10th day of December, 1985.
Clerk
Z
i
Mayor
041 nr t 2, arrg o•=. from Iris otrrat M losses area b anowwouft of
SmOb ad ~9 domMU4 free tt pawt 1000, o�l�odat sod
otp�loeaa000m
vaosem atrsot tras Bros •oomme leg. M 11tft-awaemg a ge IV
oomotr wum st wr► omd aattor, siawimll, ' grovel boost
owt6do mod otwtom
gin t iv.m.. s.s. fiew adds am et to iaoso. ob I 4 amwiase wwwl
bags, amrfaaiot and appW%amasaao
96.03 b44dm Amour Lot
96-01 California Street from adoal gone to 19009 asmlh no aabsel good from
California strott to Cough 1000 It bF aomdrMstfoa of nrA
srdpg and
.vpraeeos
Sobool load from Carolina Street to calttwula awst by oaastruatiag,
of Watermain$ etas omw, arodMsp gravel MNs garb and potter and
86-02 129 Wsternain on T.N. 22 from Oakland Avenue, to =00 South
bobool load from lighth Avenue N.V. to California Street by
oonstrootion of watermais, store swrer and apparto00een
86-03 110th Avow* ■ Y. frog, Oolwado Suet to 400• Meet Mod Celorm00
Street from Ru th Avenue N.V. to Country Cl& by ooMatrw* m or
Sanitary sanitar7 seers *twin, atom swwrs grating, gravel Mao
and appot'tenamoss
SAM= ED. 4
86-02 VAMo aid Drive from Sobool load to loos West by construction of
wading, 8 *vial baba., sorfaui0t and apportseaoM
Bradford Street in OrdMrd lark tat Addition, loburte aoadt SUdap
Avenue and Tyler Street in 4th ►anion to Lakewood 2wTs" and
Campbell Lana is Clarks god Addition b eomstreotim of puma bums
ourb and patter and appmrteoamoes
86..03 T.B. 7 West 3erv1oo load tram Les 9006& Pwft q to too' Meat b
oo0st"wUou of wml"Ing and apps teaooes
Carolina Avenue frog, Sobool load to 1SQt ant by eoatroetiam of
gravel boost curb and pdter and appmr0emamaa
,Civic Arena larking Lot by 000strnotiom at d „inK, gravel bass, wmD
and getter and appurtonamoes
lsr:m NO. S
86-03 iorS80000 Street from 3.8020 Street to SbwVood Swot; SPEUWiw
Drive to Sontbview from Linden Average to sweet Street me
3nneet Street to Linden Avenue; Solobor Avenue fras Jorseorog, argot
to Jefferson Street; lradfard Street fram Century Aveog,e to 7001
acrth; Maodall aced from aredtord Street to Ceota7 Avenue; Smsst
Street from Lindou tvawoe to 3muwlwr Drive; 3ber,-cod Street rres
jarseo0o0 Street to Century Avenue; CoMM7 Avenue from Weeneoed
Street to T.R. 15; !bird Avo ne S.W. from L7sn rood to Moot pl~
Lane; Larson street tram sobwta goad to Levu brae sed league
street from Oakland Avenue to 3e2abm Aveg* by eogstrveties of
rearing Bourse ever1a7 and appurtaeesees i
•
- 41
N
0
S
N
INC.
December 6, 1985
The Honorable Mayor Sterns
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Mayor Sterns:
q.789 ����f
a EC 1 985 r
M
�N tLi �
We have received a letter from your engineer Mr. Priebe concerning possible changes
in the traffic patterns for the service road in front of the Pamida property.
Pamida is opposed to any plans that may -cause this intersection to be closed.
Pamida has received from Plan -Mart, four (4) sets of drawings indicating the
alterations of this intersection. Here again Pamida is opposed to any closing of the
intersection, but would be respective to the service road continuing as a two way
traffic road. In other words, we do not want to impede anyone who would want access
to the center, and in particular the Pamida building. We do not feel it is a problem
at this time, but perhaps there may be when and if highway 15 is made into a four lane
highway.
This is the right time of the year when traffic is at its peak in the shopping center
and on that side of highway 15, to make an observation of the traffic flow to further
substantiate our opinion.
Respectively,
Herbert B. Underwood
Sr. Vice President
HBU:s
cc: Marlow Priebe, Engineer
8800 F Street . P.O. Box 3856 . Omaha, Nebraska 68103 . (402) 339 -2400
9 -N.
i.7
r (612) 587 -5151
C/T Y OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fire Marshal
RE: School
I request permission to attend the Annual Institute for Building Officials
January 15 -17, 1986, held at the Earl Brown Center in St. Paul.
I have attended previously and derived some very good information. This year
I plan to take the sesson on Alarm Systems and also, a legal session with a
demonstration moc trial.
This is a budgeted item.
GFF /pv
d
ge F. ield
Fire Marshal
/ 0 -Q
0 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WATER & SEWER FUND
Consulting Engineers
General Fund -City of Hutchinson
LAkeland Engineering
Norwest Bank of Mpls.
Allen Office Products
'�inerican Payment Center
Am. Water Works Assn.
Crow Chemical
Central Garage
Cash Drawer #4
(1 mnissioner of Revenue
Canada Life Assurance Co.
Cnirtin Scientific
Floor Care Supply
Family Rexall Drug
Form & Home
GTC Auto Parts
Fitzloff Hardware
G € K Services
Hutch Coop Oil
%fhrtch Leader
Hutch Utilities
flatch Wholesale
Johnson Super Valu
Junker.Sanitation
.;uul Contracting
McLeod Co. Sanitary Landfill
Montgomery Wards
Mn. Valley Testing Lab.
Plaza Hardware
Quades
Rutz Plbg $ Htg.
Power Process Inc.
Schmeling OI1 Co.
Sorensen Farm Supply
State Treasurer
STate Treasurer
U.S. Postmaster
Zins Machining Inc.
Water Products
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
0 Cummins Diesel Sales
I cker Implement
Brandon Tire
Canada Life Assurance Soc.
GTC Auto Parts
dutch Wholesale
December 10, 1985
professional fees
$197,737.44
blacktop materials
2015.00
supplies
252.51
interest 4 service fee
3695.40
desk
342.00
deposit box rental
53.00
1986 dues
19.00
chemicals
47.55
Nov. repair jobs
214.87
eye dropper
.25
Nov. sales tax
38.68
Dec. dental ins.
179.83
chemicals
43.67
pad 4 degreaser
48.60
lighters
10.17
supplies
57.84
supplies
5.84
supplies and tools
96.14
uniform rental
82.80
gasoline
584.33
public hearing notice
15.18
electricity and gas
12,121.71
supplies
19.94
distilled water & vinegar
32.70
refuse charge
21,633.75
manhole cover F repair curb box
334.50
Nov. dumping charges
15.00
typewriter
174.76
testing
181.00
supplies
52.14
repairs
21.00
repairs
56.55
repairs
373.75
grease
45.60
supplies
4.38
PERA
259.72
Social Security
430.82
pre -sort mailing permit
40.00
supplies
24.70
meters $ parts
279.38
parts
$ 37.09
parts
16.71
repairs & parts
413.30
Dec. dental ins.
28.31
parts rc:,._ . _ _
2347.87
parts
178.56
TTi;lt'':
61.00
Interstate Diesel
parts
37.61
& P Supply
parts
3.67
•L
MTI Dist.
parts
364.91
MacQueen Equipment
parts
22.15
Plaza Hardware
parts
2.73
Plowmans
repairs
31.90
Rockite Silo Co.
supplies
10.72
Road Machinery
repairs
841.11
Schmeling Oil
oil
245.19
Sorensen Farm Supply
parts
56.08
State Treasurer
PERA
37.99
State Treasurer
Social Security
63.02
ToWn $ Country Tire
repairs
14.50
Ziegler Inc.
parts
731.76
Wigen Chevrolet
parts
36.03
GENERAL FUND
Bruce Ericson
MRPA conference
$ 36.48
Duane Dascher
20 bales straw
30.00
Jerry Dostal
sr. citizen dance
100.00
Joe Sic
cleaning Center
50.75
Harland Emans
custodian fees
180.00
David Erlandson
federal court lawsuit
25.22
Scott Webb
federal court lawsuit
51.69
Adventure Publications
tree handbook
57.50
AllSteel Inc
2 keys
4.50
Anderson Interiors
2 paint cans
5.00
Carols Cafe
prisoner board
27.55
Cretive Fitness
publication
55.00
Dictaphone
repairs
332.00
Division of Code Enforcement
license permits
20.00
Erickson & Templin
snow removal
1664.50
Game Time
equipment
1495.51
Hutch Agency Inc.
clerk treas bond
375.00
Hutch Schwinn
2 flags
6.50
Intl Police Assn.
1986 dues
10.00
Mn. Chief of Police
1986 dues
30.00
Northwest Chapter
1986 dues
15.00
National Guard Armory
gym rental
240.00
Potentials Development
subscription
11.45
Polor Plastics Inc.
supplies
22.39
Public Documents Division
home rules
5.50
-3-
GENERAL FUND
•Abbott Electronics
supplies
$ 6.00
Allen Office Products
supplies
29.46
Am. Public Works Assn.
1986 dues
99.00
Big Bear
supplies
14.99
John Bernhagen
Dec. compensation
1500.00
Central Garage
Nov. repair jobs
5926.44
Cash Drawer #4
cash expenses
70.92
Central Mn. Comm.
reparis
987.50
Crow River Vet Clinic
boarding dogs
125.00
Coast to Coast
supplies
120.85
Coca Cola Bottling Co.
supplies
371.40
Chabber of Commerce
Dec. Rental
125.00
Copy Equipment
supplies
104.66
Co. Treasurer
dl fees
58.00
Canada Life Assurance Co.
Dec. dental ins.
1938.25
Culligan Water Cond.
salt $ monthly service
39.00
D.A. Tange Co.
Nov. retainer
375.00
County Recorder
recording fees
10.00
Ericksons Foods
supplies
120.18
Family Rexall Drug
supplies
150.81
Farm & Home
supplies
127.70
Floor Care Supply
supplies
1305.93
Great Plains
supplies
255.37
GTC Auto Parts
supplies & parts
22.43
Gopher Sign
signs
287.75
Fitzloff Hardware
supplies
96.04
Gopher Sign
sign
62.50
G $ K Services
uniform rental
369.13
Hager Jewelry
ups charges
1.49
Hutch Coop Oil
gasoline
3588.74
Henrys Candy Co.
supplies
776.95
Home Bakery
supplies
18.48
Hutch Iron & Metal
supplies
5.85
Hutch Leader
legals
162.94
Hutch Med. Center
comprehensive physical
100.00
Hutch Utilities
electricity -gas etc.
14,499.02
Hutch Wholesale
supplies $ equipment
363.87
Hutch Fire $ Safety
repairs
10.00
ICMA Retirement
contribution
142.46
Ind. School Dist. 423
bldg. supervisor etc.
166.55
Ink Spots
printing
153.50
Ideal Shoe Shop
repairs
4.00
Jahnkes Red Owl
supplies
91.42
Jerabek Machine Shop
supplies
6.07
Juul Contracting
level dirt $ water connection
777.50
Kustom Mech. Service
repairs
235.92
Kokesh Inc.
supplies
79.39
Krasen Plbg $ Htg.
supplies
.90
L & P Supply
repairs
52.50
MITI Distribution
parts
303.55
Bus Products
monthly maintenance
35.00
'0Iankato
1cLeod Coop Power
electricity
372.17
MidContinent Theatre
Dec. rental
325.00
Kcnneth Merrill
audit workshop
18.45
'.�_("arvev Coffee Inc.
coffee
60.40
-4-
.
Northern States Supply
supplies
$ 33.30
No. Am. Cable System
basic cable
6.45
Orlin Henke
2 months intown mileage
60.00
Pitney Bowes
meter rental
41.25
Plaza Hardware
supplies
64.51
Marlow Priebe
conference expenses
300.76
Quades Inc.
repairs F supplies
263.65
Rannow Electric
repairs
19.50
Rockite Silo Inc.
equipment $ supplies
2414.47
Rutz Plbg. & Htg.
repairs
110.70
R & R Specialties
repairs
49.90
Shopko
supplies
280.66
Simonson Lbr.
supplies & equipment
66.77
Sorensen Farm Supply
supplies
2.60
Standard Printing
printing
86.10
State Treasurer
pera
3748.22
State Treasurer
social security
2861.49
James Schaefer
z dec. compensation
1001.00
Tri County Water cond.
salt
17.10
University of Mn.
registration fees
270.00
Xerox
contract payment
270.92
Wm. Mueller $ Sons
street materials
481.40
Wesley Pharmacy
supplies
1.99
Pool & Recreation Const. Fund
transfer of funds
31,000.00
Library Construction Bonds
Hennen Furniture table $ chairs 368.50
40"—
BOND FUNDS
.1980 Tax Inc.Debt Service
League of Mn. Cities
Federal Revenue Sharing
Hutch Leader
Pool $ Recreation Construction Bonds
Bonds of 1984
City of Hutchinson, General Fund
Fire Construction Bond Fund
Pro Maintenance
Hospital Bonds of 1977
1st National Bank of St. Paul
Burns Manor Nursing Home Bonds
American National Bank of St. Paul
I
Bonds of 1980
1st Bank of Minneapolis
Bonds of 1981
Bonds of 1976
Norwest Bank of Minneapolis
Bonds of 1981
Bonds of 1982
1980 Tax Increment Debt Service Fund
Bonds of 1975
Bonds of 1982
1980 Tax Increment Debt Service
Bonds of 1981
Bonds of 1980
Bonds of 1982
Parking Bonds of 1981
Parking Bonds of 1984
Pool & Recreation Const. Bonds
Sports Technology Inc.
City of Hutchinson - General Fund
Bonds of 1985
City of Hutchinson - General Fund
Hutch Utilities
John Aldridge
Juul Contracting Co.
Bethke Construction
uuly Contracting
Atkinson Blacktop
J. D, Hanson Construction
Erickson $Templin
assessment 502.53
hearing notice 27.82
transfer of funds 31,000.00
blacktop materials 110.00
sealing floor 1356.60
interest & service fee 30,137.50
interest & service fee 91,538.00
interest $ service fee 16,216.20
transfer of funds 7,000.00
interest & service fee 4,017.00
transfer of funds 52,000.00
transfer of funds 30,000.00
transfer of funds 8,000.00
transfer of funds 38,000.00
transfer of assessment pd. 1,420.86
transfer of funds 20,000.00
transfer of funds 3,500.00
equipment 1,532.00
surcharge on bldg. permit 30.00
blacktop materials 3,316.00
Rolling Greens Estates liter 1,482.48
refund of assessment paid 210.00
extend storm sewer & investigation4,824.60
estimate #5 3,559.38
estimate #7 3,808.92
estimate #3 4,774.74
estimate ='3 545.80
estim:it_ 1;4 f; #1 4,102.32
•
1
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
Quality Wine & Spirits
Twin City Wine Co.
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Ed Phillips & Sons
Quality Wine & Spirits
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Twin City Wine Co.
Ed Phillips &Sons
Quality Wine & Spirits
Ed Phillips $ Sons
Griggs Cooper & Co.
City of Hutchinson
State Treasurer
State Treasurer
so
Co. wine $
liquor
1538.23
wine $
liquor
1231.26
wine $
liquor
1073.52
wine $
liquor
2084.54
Co. wine $
liquor
543.15
wine $
liquor
1284.10
wine &
liquor
3708.96
wine $
liquor
1310.77
wine &
liquor
2082.66
wine &
liquor
2085.79
wine &
liquor
1835.21
payroll
4481.81
PERA
162.58
Social
Security
269.69
0
Hutchins, M
December 8, 1985
Dear Mayor and City Council,
FAR YQl1
The Hutchinson Woman Fs Club has renewed plans with Ralph
Neurenn for beautification of the cemetery entrance.
it is our plan to donate this for the betterment of the
city, when highway 15 construction permits.
Hutchinson Wanan's Club
•
LI
r i 12)587 -5151
Y OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE: November 27, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Homer Pittman, Building Official
RE: William Janousek Property
Mr. Janousek is worried that he would be liable for crossing his property to
get to Main Street from the parking lot at North Hassan Street.
If Mr. Janousek does not want people crossing his property, I would suggest
that he put up a fence or a wall to keep people off his property. However,
if Mr. Janousek wishes to put up a fence or wall, he would be required to
obtain a Building Permit, and if digging is to be done, an Excavation Permit
must also be obtained.
HP /pv
cc: William Janousek
Homer Pittman
Building Official
�6 12) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 Ap
R ftl? �
l �rpR�r
M E M O R A N D U M
0
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: MARLOW PRIEBE — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: GARY PLOTZ ------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL BY CITY ENGINEER
Preliminary'Plat Procedures: Section 3.44 Subdivision
Ordinance states:
"The Preliminary Plat shall receive the approval of
the Engineer as to engineering consideration prior
to consideration by the Planning Commission. A
Certificate of Approval by the Engineer shall be
attached to the Preliminary Plat."
Included in the Certificate of Approval, I hereby
request, a statement as to whether or not the
proposed preliminary plat meets the subdivision
ordinance requirements, especially Sections 3.00
through 3.60, and including PRELIMINARY PLAT DATA
Section 3.30 through 3.3118.
Please provide this before the Planning Commission
meeting.
cc: P1znning Commission and Staff
k,Mayor and Council
ti
•
0
Hutchinson Fire Department
Relief Association Fleeting
Monday, October 21, 1985
President Smith brought the meeting to order at 9 :25 p.m.
Minutes of the August meeting were read and approved. Members
present were President Eric Smith, Chief Butch Henke, Gary Henke,
Randy Redman, Marlin Torgerson, Steve Schramm and Larry Thompson.
Gary Henke gave the Treasurer's report showing total revenues to
date of $59,452.00. Total assests were $364,746.00. Gary said
that he invested the $100,000 at IDS with Barb Bonniwell.
The following bills were ordered paid from their proper accounts.
Special Fund
General Account
U.S. Postmaster $ 22.00 Carr Flowers $ 30.00
Adeline DeFluth 2000.00 - Browns Floral - 25.00
Vol. Fireman's B.A. 12.00
Gary Henke 150.00
Vol. Fireman's B.A. 120.00
We received $25,000.00 two percent money and Gary recommended
that we invest it at First State Federal for 6 months at 7.25%
Marlin Torgerson motioned and Butch Henke seconded to accept
Gary's recommendation. Motion passed.
Discussion turned to the lump sum vs. annuity subject. It was
felt by board members that more information is needed before we
can make any decisions as which way to go from here. A schedule
was set up of steps to do including contacting Gus Welter to update
his figures he gave us. Butch will find out what facts he needs so
we can go to the City and find out what their responsibility would
be.
Gary Henke motioned to allow Daryl Lade to go on the vested rights
rolls as of October 9, 1985. Marlin Torgerson seconded. The motion
passed.
The meeting adjourned at 10 :17 p.m.
Randy Redman
Secretary
Minutes
Hutchinson Fire Department - Officer's Fleeting
November 11, 1985
The meeting was called to order-at 9 :15 p.m.
Dick stated there will be an Officer's Drill after January 1.
The generator on #233 is out. Brad will check into the cost of
fixing it.
Brad asked if we were going to rotate first -out trucks. #239
will be first -out after January 1 and #237 will be used for
drills.
Brad will be getting prices on larger tires for #234, for the
Town Board Meeting.
Tim Schloeder requests that the ladder on #235 be removed. Chief
Henke stated it will be left-on the truck.
Chief Henke made a presentation on ladders and their uses.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:06 p.m.
Respectfully,
Mark Christensen
Secretary
is
l
L,ggi
0
t
4
Minutes
Hutchinson Fire Department - Regular Meeting
Monday, November 4, 1985
The meeting was called to order•at 8:56 p.m. Minutes of the
previous meetings were read and approved.
Howard Riggle reported on the annual dance. It will be January
18th at the Cedar's Edge in Cedar Mills. Music will be by the
Highliners and tickets will be $2.50.
#235 is having a suspension problem. It is being checked into
and will be reported on. Also, a motion was made and seconded to
have the numbers shadow painted on the doors. The truck committee
will meet and bring its recommendation to the December meeting for
a vote. Motion passed.
The voting procedure for electing captains was discussed. It will
continue as in the past.
Candidates for 1986 Officers are:
Chief
1st Asst. Chief
2nd Asst. Chief
Secretary
Treasurer
Orlin .Henke
Dick Popp
Brad Emans
Open
Gary Henke
Captains
#231
Randy Redman
#233
Howard Riggle
#237
Jim Brodd
#239
Mike Monge'
#235
John Reynolds
I iatitannn+C
Dave Fransen
Jon Burks
John Madsen
Craig Almquist
Tim Schloeder
The following bills and runs were paid from their proper accounts:
Runs
10/6 Koepp
10/7 Drill
10/11 3M
10/14 Laton
10/14 Drill
10/20 Opitz
10121 Drill
10/26 Ball
10/27 Echo Circle
r, :es - 11/4/85
Page 2
General
City
Hutch Police Department
150.00
Fitzloff Hdwe
'
14.70 t
to to "
250.00
Orlin Henke
123.97
Orlin Henke
300.00
Mid- Central Fire
24.75
If of
600.00
#237 Regulator
195.80
Arlington Fire Department
22.00
Red Owl
5.97
Rural
City of Hutchinson
1,000.00
"
950.00
"
14,499.00
It was suggested that the County Chief's Association use a portion of the
revenue sharing money for an air tester, to be used in the County.
There was discussion on our filling of scuba tanks and our liability if
they get bad air. It will be checked with the City Attorney.
There will be a meeting on November 25th regarding firefighter certifica-
tion. Motion made and seconded that we go on record as not supporting the
State in having us certified. It should stay in control at the local level.
Motion passed.
#234 is in need of baffles. Tom Pessek will check into the cost.
The Chiefs reports on what was at the chief's convention in Duluth.
Motion made and seconded to reinstate George Field after his leave. Motion
passed.
There was discussion on the items the Country Club donated to us. Motion
made and seconded to donate $100.00 to the Country Club Kitchen Fund for
their donated items. It will be paid from the General Account. Motion
passed.
Harvey Kemper suggested having one person in charge of each truck, with 5
assistants to help with training. The by -laws committee will be checking into
possible changes.
There will be a salary change proposal before the department in December, for
the Treasurer's position.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully, OR
Mark Christensen
Secretary
1
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
CRY OF NUTCHMM
DATE December 2, 1985
NAME Lisa Fulayter ADDRESS St. Cloud
JOB TITLE Skating -Drofessional - junior precision -coach
SUPERVISED BY
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE
FULL TIME
PAY RATE S12/hr
COMMENTS
OTHER:
Y PART TIME OR SEASONAL
winter ice show
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS
'RE—k 'RE—k MENT (& AD
PERSONNEL COORDINATOR
CITY M"ATO
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM LIBRARY BOARD MEETING
November 11, 1985
Present: James Phalen, Graceville Representing: Big Stone County
Wayne Hebrink, Renville to Kandiyohi County
Linda Ulrich, Renville of Renville
Jeanette Buchanan, Willmar Willmar
LeRoy Sanders, Willmar Willmar
Due to inclement weather, the full board did not meet on Monday, November 11, 1985.
The above board members met to approve expenditures and sign checks.
Mr. Hebrink stated that the financial report was in order and moved payment of
bills. Seconded by Buchanan. Carried.
The meeting was held from 7:00 -7:30 p.m.
Jeanette Buchanan
Secretary
1
so
November 1985
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
Treasurer's
Report
Curtis Johnson,
Treasurer
AUTOMATION
INCOME
BUDGET INCOME
MTD
YTD
MTD
BUDGET YTD
BUDGET
lance
$188,309.33
$ 85,962.84
Receipts:
State /Federal Aid
12,506.00
209,242.00
206,100.00
Big Stone County
658.00
21,937.00
21,937.00
*Chippewa County
2,123.00
71,490.00
*71,490.00
Kandiyohi County
3,130.00
93,774.00
93,774.00
McLeod County
56,550.21
60,824.00
Meeker County
13,673.50•;.
54,694.00
59,072.00
Swift County
499.58
8,687.00*••-
; 17,374.00
17,374.00
Appleton
276.00
8,584.00
8,584.00
Benson
548.00
17,037.00
17,037.00
Glencoe
659.00
22,249.00
22,249.00
Graceville
117.00
3,849.02
3,849.00
Hutchinson
1,387.00
48,580.00
48,580.00
_ Kerkhoven _.
114.00
3,546.00
3,546.00
Litchfield
886.00
36,206.00
36,206.00
Ortonville
382.00
12,700.00
12,700.00
Willmar
2,384.00
76,725.00
76,725.00
Bird Island
206.00
6,421.00
6,421.00
*Dawson
285.00
8,859.00
* 8,859.00
Hector
188.00
4,376.01
4,376.00
*Madison
332.00
10,308.00
*10,308.00
Renville
224.00
6,987.00
6,987.00
Cash Receipts
3,538.79
40,414.93
44,975.00
Gifts
984.00
Interest
(Oct.) 578.29
6,161.55
9,000.00
Reimtursements (local govt)
*Chippewa County
31,247.00
*31,247.00
*Madison
3,310.00
* 3,310.00
*Dawson
5,177.00
* 5,177.00
Other Reimbursements
259.00
7,082.84
6,000.00
Other (KCWL)
1,000.00
Total Receipts
14,398.58
39,262.58
886,865.56
896,707.00
Glencoe Fund
4,635.00
Implementation Grant (1984)
6,000.00
KCWL
671.00
TOTAL RECEIPTS & BALANCE:
$227,571.91
$972,828.40
$908,013.00
Automation Totals
14,398.58
18,000.00
TOTAL RECEIPTS, HAT ONCE & AUTOMATION
MTD & YTD
$227,571.91
$987,226.98
$926,013.00
Page 1 (OVER)
November 1985 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM Treasurer's Report
(Continued)
EXPENDITURES:
MTD
TTO
= OF EXP
E�1
_
EXPENDITURES
EXPENDITURES
TO EST
buorE7
ACCT
GROUP... 000
.00
- - - -
.00%
--
.00
LIBRARY
PERSONAL SERVICES
SALARIES- AND WAGES _
_ -- ___ 499522.49
5269626941
90.15%
5e49135.00
HEALTH INSURANCE
1.701.44
22.380.31
8b.08%
2'6.000.00
MEDICAL PAYMENTS
392.92
39202
.00%
.00
_ RETIREMENT- INSURANCE. - - -.
-- __� -_ -- ,4.359.55
- 469471.51
82.51%
56.325.00
ACCT
GROUP... 559976.40
5959671015
89.41%
6E69460.00
MATERIALS
__BOOKS,.= ADULT _ _
_ ____- 39272.31_ -
-_- __519868.90
93.84% -
.5.274.00
BOOKS - CHILDREN
29209.04
139067.67
77.97%
16-#760.00
GENERAL REFERENCE
.00
49292.50
119.24%
396CO.00
PERIODICALS- .-- _ - -_ -._ _
_- _ __
-- ___ ___ -_ _- 175.12
_ 219229.60
109.43;
199400.00
PAMPHLETS
.00
16.00
5.33%
3CO.00
8MM 6 16MM FILMS
.CO
39246.25
83.24%
399CO.00
__- VIDEO- OISCS_G TAPES -_
_
.._467.38 _
89436.28
145.45%
59800.00
AUDIO DISCS AND TAPES
.00
154.04
154004%
1CO.00
SLIDES AND FILM STRIPS
72.05
85.05
34.02%
250.00
•00 -
-_ __ -- - 267.00
.00% _
__ _ .Do
BINDING
388.38
973.7 7
162.30%
6CO.00
ACCT
GROUP... 69584.28
1039637.06
97.79%
IO59-984.00
CATALOGING__-_- -�.
OCLC CHARGES
000
12.997.13
67.80%
_199171.00
COM VENDOR CHARGES
19971.25
109580.73
111.38%
995C0.00
_- - _-
ACCT
GROUP...- _ 1- 9971.25
-- _239577.86
82.24%
28__9671.P
VEHICLES
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
19111.59
139906.73
e9.94%
159463
INSURANCE
_ .00 _
19186.26
51.58%
29300
_
-ACCT
GROUP... 19111.59
159092.99
84.97%
179753.0
COMMUNICATION
TELEPHONE- AND LINE
774.07
8-#752.97
1C9.41%
8.000.00
_
TERMINAL MAINTENANCE
_
.CO
.00
.00%
194CO.00
POSTAGE AND SHIPPING
540.78
79153.45
89.42%
89000.00
-- -
ACCT
GROUP... 19314.85
- - - -- -- --
- 159906.42
91.42%
17940C.00
EQUIPMENT
NEW EQUIPMENT
20.45
59074.34
97.58%
5 ,o2CO.00
A/V EQUIPMENT
.00
80.00
2.86%
2.800,pOC
NT
EQUIPMENT MAIENENCE ACID CONTRACTS
_
486.72
79781.53
77.82%
109000.00
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
161.98
39115.11
148.34%
29100.00
ACCT
GROUP..._____ _ 669.15
169050.98
79.86%
209100.00
OTHER
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT
9.38
998.72
99.87%
29000.00
SUPPLIES AND PRINTING
670.56
23.20C.02
121.63%
199075.00
PROMOTICNAL AND PROGRAMMING
254.45
566.34
113.67%
3co.00
MILEAGE Af4D MEETINGS - STAFF
19255.70
69C80.14
109.16%
59570.00
MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES
294_.28
29743.08
69.35%
39070.00
PROF. MEMBERSHIPS ITRUSTEESI,
_ .CO
510.00
100.00%
510.00
INSURANCE
000
59733.00
94.65%
69057.00
ADS AND LEGAL NOTICES
.C^
561.64
624.04%
90.00
AUDITING
_ _ _
- .06
19400.00
116.67%
1.200.00
- d-bOKKEaIh
5�0-
29475.ao
e2.50t
3-9000:00- -
CONTINUING EDUCATION
000
285.12
142.56%
X0.00
ACCT
GROUP... 29711937
449555.06
110.64%
409272.00
SPECIAL --r. - - -- ----- - -- -_-
-- - - --
GLENCOE FRIENDS• 1983
000
518.86
11.19%
49635.00
KCWL
.00
385.00
57.38%
671.00
SALARY STUDY ___ - ___
-- ��160.00
_
2916C.00
54.GC%
490CC.00
AUTOMATION FUND
.00
149398.58
79.99%
189000.00
GROUP*.,* 29160.00
179462.44
63.95%
2700
---ACCT-
- - - -- -- - -
-ORG.
TCTAL... - - -72 9498.89-
- - 83291S3.96
- 90.06%
923 995
ENDING CASH BALANCE
$155,073.02
$155,073.02
Page 2
r�
/// /// (612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 27, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
•,• •� � •• era � •• •a�• •: i i� �•••� � ••
It is our recommendation that consideration for merit increases for
all employees (except police officers, who are on a longevity system)
be changed from January 1 to each employee's individual anniversary -
date, and that this be incorporated into the pay plan resolution
which will be adopted for 1986.
Directors review the performance of their employees as they grow into
their jobs, and using anniversary dates as the performance review time
is a logical way of dealing with each empoloyee's individual situation.
Employees are hired at entry level pay and have a right to expect to
advance to higher levels in their assigned pay grades as they became
more proficient in their performance. The supervisor, who has first
hand knowledge of the quality of performance of his/her employees, should
have the responsibility and the authority to see that each employee's
work is fairly ccnpensated through this merit system.
(It is recommended that merit review for employees with 5 years or less
of service be made now (December, 1985) in order to bring these employees
into line with the pay equity principles established in the 1985 pay plan.
Thereafter, individual anniversary dates would be used for them also.)
It is our belief that merit consideration should be kept completely
separate fron the council consideration for general wage adjustment which
is done in December each year. Doing them during the same month makes
it too easy to confuse the processes, which are not related.
a
• (612) 587 -5151
r /T Y OF HUTCH /NSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 27, 1985
(0
FOR CITY COUNCIL USE ONLY
MEMORANDUM
TO: MYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: HAZEL SITZ, P COORDIl� rim
RE: SALARY HISTORY
Attached are excerpts from personnel records, as requested,
shoring employee salaries as of November, 1985, as compared
to November, 1981. The history of merit increases is shown
for each employee as well.
Score employees received a pay equity adjustment due to the
impletnentaticn of the cow arable worth law in January, 1985.
That adjustment is shown.
General or cost of living increases which were granted to
all employees in January of each year are not reflected on
this abstract. These were:
January, 1985 . . . . . 4%
January, 1984 . . . . . 5%
January, 1983 . . . . . 6%
January, 1982 . . . . . 1 cap at $36,000
2 dept. heads 8%
Grade IV and up 9�% ( *old grading system)
Grade I -III 11 %, with min.of $1370
January, 1981 . . . . . 8 %, plus 2.5% for Grades I -III
A summary of information available from the Regional Office (Chicago)
of the Bureau of Labor Statistics concerning the 1985 consumer price
* index as of this date:
. All urban consumers employment cost index (wages & salaries)
* in Midwest -12 Months through. September, 1985
. All urban consumers employment cost index (wages & benefits)
* in Midwest -12 months through September 1985
All urban consumers - U.S. index - the broadest Measure -
* -12 months through September, 1985
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
*
4%
3.8%
3.2%
* * *
ALSLEBNN, EARL
STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
68 /06/16
1K
10.24 (1981 - 7.80)
107%
2.5% merit 7 -84. 2.6% merit 7 -81
SAABNN. EUGENE
STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
80 /11/17
II
9.12 (1981 - 6.09)
96%
2.5% merit 7 -83, 7.5% merit and reclassify 2 -83.2 2.5% merit
7 -81
47 coat /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
NAKNRN. ROGSR
COIMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
79 /11/13
VI
8.23 (1981 - 5.80)
106.5%
2% merit 1- 85.2.5% merit 7 -84, 2.6% merit 7- 83,2.6% merit 7 -81
BENTZ, MARGUERITE
POLICE DISPATCHER
76 /09/16
VII
8.31 (1981 - 5.66)
100%
3.7% merit 7 -84, 3.6 %laerit 7 -81, 2.5% merit 7 -80
64 cant /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
BOELTER. GALE
PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
74 /10 /O1
IX
9.60 (1981 - 6.88)
100%
2.5% merit 7 -84, 5% merit 7 -81
52 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
BRILL, CHUCK
PART TIME OFFICER L DISPATCHER
78
V / III
7.20 /6.21
100%
BARENIN, ELDON
BROTEN, DONALD
STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
LIQUOR STORE CLERK
80 /06/12
79 /06/16
IE
V
9.60 (1961 - 6.55)
7.90 (1981 - 6.13)
100%
110%
2.5% merit 7- 83,,6% merit 7 -81
5% merit 7 -81, 6% merit 7 -80
93 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
SAUMNTZ. BONNIE I
BROWN, JANET
RECEPTIONIST /CASHIER JOBBRARE
PART TIME DISPATCHER
81 /07/19
80
IV
III
6.10 (1981 - 3.65)
6.21
91%
100%
.02 cyst /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
BELL, CRARLEE
BUSS, NANCY
PAR9190 OFFICER PART TINE
SECRETARY, POLICE DEPARTMENT
(RETIRED)
78 /11/20
T4
VI
5.36
- 8.14 (1981 - 5.30)
107%
106%
merit 1 -86
2% merit 1 -85, 9% merit and recless 7 -84, 6% merit 7 -83, 6%
merit 10 -81, 6% merit 7 -79
'
I
19f
DASCHNE. DUANE
STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
73 /11 /O1
IE
9.60 (1981 - 7.40)
1
T Y merit 7 -81, 6% merit 7 -80
08 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
BAVIDSON. SEPTEMBER
SENIOR ACTIVITINS SUPERVISOR PART TIME
84 /08/20
III
5.59
90%
BRVRIRB. RANDY
CHIEF NASTNYATNR PLANT OPERATOR
72 /08/23
E
10.56 (1981 -8.33)
100%
5% merit 7 -83. 5% merit 7 -81. 5% merit 7 -80
21 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
BARRY, RICHARD
HATER MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN
77 /03/28
VII
8.42 (1981 - 5.94)
101%
10% merit and reclean 7 -82, 5% merit 7 -81, 6% merit 7 -80
BRICBON. BRUCE
DIRECTOR PANNE i RECREATION
78 /10/23
B 1
32,510 (1981 - 24,404)
101.5%
1.6% merit 1 -86, 5% merit 4 -81, 10% merit h title change 4 -80
56 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
ERLAMD80N, DAVID
POLICE OFFICER
80 /O1 /09
E'
11.18 (1981 - 8.33)
106%
longevity 1 -85
f
FIELD, GEORGE
FIRE MARSHAL
78 /01/04
F
28,017 (1981 - 21,911)
106.6%
6% merit 1 -86, 6% merit 4 -81
FORCIER, PHILIP 11
CITY HALL CUSTODIAN /BNGINEBR
84 /06/23
V
7.16
98%
(probation completed 11 -84)
GRAY, JEAN
POLICE DISPATCHER
82 /09/13
VII
7.89
96%
3.7% merit 7 -84, 2.5% merit 3 -83
85 cant /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
GREGOR, JOHN
POLICE SERGEANT
70 /08/14
F
2w,-9'8 (1981 - 28,590)
109.5%
2% merit 1 -86, 2.6% merit 7 -83
GROEHLSR, FLOYD
CEMETERY MAINTEMANCB SUPERVISOR
77 /01/04
II
9.60 (1981 - 7.22)
100%
2.5% merit 7 -83, 5% merit 7 -81, 5% merit 7 -79
07 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
HAARSTAD, EARL
PARE MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
83 /06/16
IX
9.12
95%
5% merit 7 -84, 2.5% merit 11 -83
47 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
J
RAASL, JIM
IVERSON, GENE
POLICE OFFICER
PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
74 /04/0$
74 /04/01
I
Ix
11.62 (1981 - 6.92)
9.60 (1981 - 7.22)
109%
100%
longevity 4 -85
2.5% merit 7 -84, 5% merit 7 -81
08 cent /br equity adjustment 1 -86
JONES, ast page
RAOOEN, SANSASA
-
, AUsee
PROGRAM SUPERVISOR, REC /SR.CNTR
BUS DRIVER
83 /01/03
78 /08/14
I
V
18,068
7.33 (1981 - 5.43)11
96%
101%
3% merit 7 -84
1.2% merit 7 -84, 2.5% merit 7 -83, 5% merit 7 -81, 2.5% merit
7 -80 i
•1.07 /br equity adjustment 1 -85
HAUGEN.MARYIN
KARG, LARRY
CIVIC ARENA MANAKIN
STREET MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
80 /08/04
69 /06/18
a
x
23,648 (1981 - 17,090)
11.26 (1981 - 8.75)
98%
107%
3% merit 1 -85, 10% merit 4 -81
2% merit 1 -85, 5% merit 7 -80
se coat/hr equity adjustment 1 -85
I
RINECEE, RINEY
KIRCHOF►, JOYCE
NASTENATER PLANT OPERATOR
LIQUOR STORE CLERK PART TIME
84 /08/04
82 /10/16
I
I
9.60
6.31
90%
100%
(probation emd,12 -84)
merit 7 -84
36 coat/hr equity adjustment 1 -86
38 coat/hr equity adjustment 1 -86
ROGAN. MIKE
KIRCHOFF, MIKE
POLICE OFFICER
POLICE OFFICER
73 /12/24
71 /03/31
I
x
11.62 (1981 - 8.92)
110%
109%
11.64 (1981 - 9.01)
longevity 8 -85
1
longevity 4 -84
• ■UNN. LARRY
KIRCHOFF, RON
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I
POLICE SERGEANT
70 /11 /13
68 /03/18
VII
F
8.42 (1981 - 5.94)
-
28,995 (1981 - 22,1311
102%
109.6%
6% merit 7 -84, 5% merit 7 -83
f
2% merit 1 -86
J
[BURGER, GLORIA
?:ANSI? BISPAlCREB JOIBRARE
76 /11/15
' III
6.21 (1981 - 3.65)
100%
grit 7 -84
i
32 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
LARSON. MARE
PARE MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
74 /10/01
II
8.60 (1981 - 6.55)
100%
E.5% merit 7 -84. 5% merit 7 -83, 5% merit 7 -81
62 cent /br equityadjastment 1 -85
LARSON, QUENTIN
ENGINSIRING TIONNIOIAN II
78 /11 /O1
II
10.24 (1981 - 6.55)
106%
5% merit 7 -84, 5% merit 7 -81, 5% merit 7 -80
LATiIG. MARVIN
■DE DRIVER
78 /08/18
V
7.33 (1981 - 5.56)
101%
1.2% merit 7 -80, 5% merit 7 -81.6% merit 7 -80
LAIEN. MANY
POLICE DISPATCHER
84 /01/04
VII
7.48
90%
(probation complete 10 -84)
84 cost /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
LINK, KATI
SICRITART, PLANNING COMMISSION
83 /01/03 1
VI
7.47
96.6%
1.5% merit 1 -85. 5% merit 7 -84
19 coat /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
11
LIPIE, MARY LOU
MOTOR YIHICLE CLIRI PART TIME
80 /12/04
II
6.66 (1981 - 3.85)
95%
20 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
MARIA, JAMES
ASST. BUILDING INSPECTOR
84 /11/13
G
21,736
90%
(probation end 5 -85)
49 coot /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
MATHRNY, JEANNETTE
LIQUOR STORE CLERK
80 /09/10
V
7.90 (1981 - 5.56)
110%
8X merit 7 -83
MATTSFIRLD, BILL
POLICE OFFICIR
76 /O8 /O1
I
11.41 (1981 - 8.84
108%
longevity 8 -84
MCKAY, KAREN
SKCRRTARY, PARIS 4 RECREATION
80 /07/07
VI
7.58 (1981 - 5.05)
98%
3% merit 1 -85, 7.5% merit 7 -83, 10% merit and reclaas 7 -81
36 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
MCRAITH, JOHN
ASST. RECREATION DIRECTOR
81 /06/03
G
22,921 (1981 - 13,000)
95%
4% merit 7 -84, 7.6% merit 7 -83
;1.63 /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
0
i
MERCK, MERLE
WABTRWATER MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN
80 /08/11
VII
8.91 (1981 - 5.66)
100%
8% merit and reclass 7 -83. 5% merit 7 -81
90 ceat /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
MRIER. 8009
MOTOR POOL SUPERVISOR
77 /01/08
II
11.02 (1981 - 7.93)
95%
6% merit 7 -84, 5% msrlC aad recluse 4 -81
46 ceat /Lr equity adjustment 1 -85
MER8I1-r, IIMNNTH
FINANCE BIRRCTOR
77 /07/26
D
36.776 (1981 - 25,133)
101.5%
1.6% merit 1 -85, 10% merit 4 -81, 5% merit 4 -80
81.61 /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
NORPHT. TRANI
PART TIME OFFICER
72?
V
7.20
100%
NAGY, RICHARD
CHIEF WATER PLANT OPERATOR
74 /09/01
I
10.66 (1981 - 7.93)
100%
6% merit 7 -83, 5% merit 7 -81. reclass and merit 7 -80
NELSON, CHARLES
LIQUOR STORE MANAGER
74 /08/01
F
26,561 (1981 - 19,0521
100%
10% merit 4 -81
$1.12 / ►r equity adjustment 1 -86
NEUMANN, RALPH
DIRECTOR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
77 /04/01
D
32,635 (1981 - 25,616)
101.5%
.5% merit 1 -85, 5% merit 4 -81, 10% merit i title change 4 -80
OLSEN, DIANE
ACCOUNT TECHNICIAN
79 /01/03
VI
7.70 (1981 - 5.05)
99.5%
1% merit 1 -85, 5% merit 7 -84, 10% merit and reclass 12 -82,
5% merit 7 -81, 6% merit 7 -80
O'SORSKY,DEAN
POLICE CHIEF
72 /09/01
C
40,580 (1981 - 32,403)
116%
6% merit 4 -81. 2.5% merit 4 -80
PANEAIE, DON
PART TIME OFFICER
78
V
7.20
100%
PAULSEN, CLIFF
PARK MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
67 /07/20
X
10.56 (1981 - 7.93)
100%
2.5% merit 7 -83, 5% merit 7 -81
24 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
PAULSEN, CURT
STREET MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
68 /10/21
II
10.24 (1981 - 7.80)
100%
2.5% merit 7 -81, 6% merit 7 -79
RINOSTROM, BOB
PITTMAN, NOW
MB
POLICE OFFICER
BUILDING OFFICIAL
78 /06/19
76 /08 /18
x
F
11.30 (1981 - 8.75)
28,475 (1981 - 22,477)
107%
107%
longevity 6 -85
ex merit k title change 4 -8113X merit 4 -79
RUNES, BRUCE
PLOTZ,QARY
LIQUOR STORE CLERK
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
79 /10/01
77 /02/01
V
A
7.90 (1981 - 5.98)
43,576 (1981 - 31,956) r
11ox
101.5x i
2.5X merit 7 -83, 5X merit 7 -81, 6x merit 7 -80
1.GX msr1t1-4!6 52458 PNRA /de! comp 6 -81. 6% merit 4- 81,10% merit
A title change 4 -80
42 cost /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
BUNKS, JOLHRN
PONELL, DELORES
FINANCIAL RECORDS TECHNICIAN
TRANSIT DISPATCHER /DRIVER
74 /01/07
79 /11/24
VII
III / V
8.42 (1981 - 6.24)
6.10/7.20
101x
98% /100%
1X merit 1 -86, 6X merit 7 -81, 5% merit 7 -80
merit 7 -84
28 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
9Y coat /hr(drive),16 cent /hr(disp) equity adjustment 1 -86
SCHMIDT, HARRIET
PRIEBE. MARLON
TRANSIT DISPATCHER
DIRECTOR OF ENGINBRHING
85 /06/12
67 /03/06
III
D
5.28
41,912 (1981 - 35,175)
85%
107.5%
.5% merit 1 -86; 2.5% merit 4 -81, O% merit k title change 4 -80
S% merit 4 -79
SCHNOBRICH, MARK
REDETSEE. NANCY
CITY FORESTER
PART TIME DISPATCHER
79 /05/21
80
R
III
21,974 (1981 - 16,958)
6.21,
100%
100x
5% merit 4 -81, .10% merit 4 -80
22 cant /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
SCHUMANN, CAROLYN (ANN)
RICE, CAL
MOTOR VEHICLE CLERK PART TIME '
ASSISTANT TO CITY ENGINEER
84 /01
68 /08/01
II 11
III
13.94 (1981 - 10.90)
90%
109%
5% merit 7 -80
.
66 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -86
BMWWZ, 9ODTT
POLICE SERGEANT
FINNANCE WCCHHNNIICIAN
TO /09/01
69 /10 /16
P
VIII
28,996 (1981 - 22,11)
8.94 (198i - 6.55)
109.5% I
100%
2% merit 1 -86
2.5% merit 7 -84, 6% merit 7 -81
6.04
30 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
SIT2, HAZEL
THURN, MARIE
PERSONNEL /TRANSIT COORDINATOR
POLICE DISPATCHER
76 /09/26
73 /04/26
0 (SAL)
VII
11.73 PPT 0981 - 8.33)
8.31 (1981 - 5.94)
101.5%
100%
1.6% merit 1 -86, 5% merit 4 -81, 6% merit 4 -80
2.6% merit 7 -81, 2.5% merit 7 -80
=1.01 /hr equity adjustment 1 -85 I
64 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
SMITE. DOROTHY
TORRY, EILEEN
MOTOR VESICLE CLERK
MOTOR VEHICLE DEPUTY RROISTRAR
69 /08/26
73 /09/18
VI
VIII
8.02 (1981 - 6.24)
8.94 (1981 - 6.55) j
106%
100%
6% merit 7 -81
5% merit 7 -81
116%
60 cent /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
STRKACRSK, SCOTT
VANDERHAOEN, LINDA
PART TIME OFFICER
PART TIME DISPATCHER
84
83
i i
III i�
6.48
6.90
90%
95%
SWANSON, DIANE
VANDERVERN, PAT
RKCSPTIONIST /CASSIKR JODSRARS
ENOINEERINO SECRETARY
86 /04/16
77 /09/06
IT
VII
6.04
8.43 (1981 - 5.56)
90%
102X
2% merit 1 -86, 5% merit 7 -84, 5% merit 7 -83, 6% merit 7 -81,
5% merit 7 -80
37 coat /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
SWANSON, MARILYN
VORBECK, DONALD
ADMINISTRATITR SECRETARY
LIQUOR STORE CLERK
76 /09/07
72 /11/01
VIII
V
9.06 (1981 - 6.55)
8.26 (1981 - 6.76)
101.5%
-
116%
1.5% merit 1 -86, 2.5% merit 7 -84, 2.5% merit 7 -83, 5% merit
6% merit 7 -81
7 -81, 5% merit 7 -80
j
10 coat /hr equity adjustment 1 -85
salary freeze for pay equity 1 -85 (omit 4% COLA) tI
J .
voeraR
PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
81 /06/08
II
9.12 (1981 - 6.24)
96%
6% merit 7 -84. 2.6% merit 7 -83. 6% recluse 2 -83
06 cent / ►r equity adjustment 1 -86
MAAQE. BILK
POLICE INVRSTIQATOR
72 /08/01
F
28,996 (1981 - 22,131)
109.6%
2% merit 1 -86
MEBB, SCOTT
POLICE OFFICER
80 /03/31
K
11.19 (1981 - 7.93)
106%
longevity 3 -86
MEANER, BILL
POLICE OFFICER
72 /08/23
I
11.64 (1981 - 9.01)
110%
longevity 8 -86
W919, R. MARK
CIVIC ARENA MAINTENANCE OPERATOR
78 /09/18
II
9.60 (1981 - 6.88)
100%
2.6% merit 7/84, 6% merit 7 -81
62 coat /kr equity adjustment 1 -86
NICETERMAN, SEE
E09IPMSNT NECRANIC
79 /09/17
II
9.76 (1981 - 7.22)
102%
2.6% merit 7 -84. 2.6% merit 7 -83, 6% merit 7 -81
WRIGHT, NMM
PARK MAINTENANCE LABORER
81 /01/04
II
6.33 (1981 - 4.$1)
109%
(reclass 1 -83)
XNES, C101 UM
POLIO CEFICER
78 /02/15
X
11.30 (1981 - 8.75)
1078
longevity 2 -85
0
(612) 587 -5151
T Y OF HUTCHINSON
✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
'HINSON, MINN. 55350
December 2, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
ilk: •�- •� i i� •• -� � � •• � �
The Council requested recamLended procedures for year -end salary changes.
1. It is reconnended that consideration for merit increases be kept
separate from the year end general (cost ofof living) adjustment.- This is the consensus of department heads. See the mob on that
subject in this packet.
2. The January 1 general adjustment takes into account inflation
for the past 12 months. Any such.adjustment should not change
the structure of our pay system but must maintain the integrity
of the inTtexvals between grades. In our present pay plan, the
0 midpoint, or 100 percent level, is the base for figuring percentage
changes. Several options for general adjustments follow:
a. The general adjustment for each pay grade would be X percent
of its midpoint. Each individual in that pay grade would receive
a given number of cents per hour, regardless of his/her
present hourly rate. Each pav grade moves by the same percentage. Ex:
Grade VII midpoint is $8.31 times 4% = $.33/hr
. every employee in Grade VII receives $.33,
whether present rate is more or less than $8.31.
Grade XII/ midpoint is $12.77 times 4% = $.51/hr
(SAL -F) . every enplcyee in Grade XII receives $.51,
whether present rate is more or less than $12.77
b. Same as (a) above, and each pay grade moves by the same percentage,
except make the limitation that no employee would receive an
increase larger than that given to Grade D (or another Grade of
the Council's choosing). This would serve to level off the
larger increases, if that is the Council's desire.
c. Do not adjust the pay grades by a percentage for 1986; rather
use the same table for another year. Allow an adjustment based
on the midpoint of each pay grade. This method would have the
effect of freezing the salary of any individual who is presently
at the top of an assigned pay grade. (2 such situations exist.)
It would also cause. scme.prablems with the police longevity schedule.
I believe (a) or (b) above are the most workable methods of dealinq
with the general adjustment.
I�;
r
NININM I X10POINT 1111XI1W
BASIC TABLE OF
' ; ;
T 1
3,35
3,90
4,48
NUMBERED PAY GRADES
;
4.66
T2
3.62
4.25
-1985-
=�
-
5.31
T 3
3.93
4.62
T 4
4.26
6.01
5.76
.n s
I
4.58
5.39
6.20
.
IV
5.70
6.70
.
VII
-
7.06
5.31
7.60
- SALAitIFD-
8.94
.
=-fix
7.68
a. T9-
-9.60
11.04
'
15,974
16,973
19,968
22,963
'
17,576
18.678
21,965
25,251
+19.7323
'
20,530
24.149
27,768
XII
10.2U
10.85
12.77
14.-H
-fND
HOURLY21,258
22,568
26.562
30.555
_
N
23,35E
24.814
29.203
33.592
W
O
OC
25.688
27.290
32,115
35.693
o
8
J
28.246
30.014
35.318
40.622
4.94
.88
.68
-
31.075
33.030
38.854
44.678
16.43
0.
_
34.174
36.317
42.723
49,130
This Resolution authorizes staff
to
change
1985 budget appropriations to
reflect rate changes.
Adopted by the City Council this
8th day
of January,
1985.
(This replaces
Resolution
No. 7637.)
ATTEST:
Robert
N. Stearns, Mayor
Gary D otz, City Administrator
(4 of 4)
(612) 587 -5151
fITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: November 27, 1985
TO: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator and Hazel Sitz, Personnel Coordinator
FROM: Homer Pittman, Building Official
RE: Wage Adjustments
It is that time of year again, when we are looking at wage adjustment and how
much of an increase will be allowed by the City Council.
I feel that the minimum wage adjustment should be whatever the C.P.I. is at
this time.
I, also, feel very strongly, that my job classification should be a D and not
F. This position may not have a lot of people under me, but it entails very
good public relations and at times is very frustrating and carries a lot more
responsibility than some people realize.
See the new job description attached.
HP /pv
attachment
i
Homer Pittman
Building Official
BUILDING CODE DIVISION
Job Description - Municipal Building Official
Supervise evaluation and inspection of building construction for compliance with
the State Building Code, Federal and State Laws and municipal ordinances
pertaining to building construction.
Assists and advises the general public, design profession and construction
industry on matters relating to the building code and building construction.
Performs related duties.
Examples of duties:
Supervises activities of inspection department which includes, but is not limited
to the following:
Process building permit applications - coordinate with other municipal
departments; i.e. engineering, utilities, fire prevention, planning, health,
assessing, etc..., and with state and federal governmental - agencies.
Review plans and specifications for compliance with building code requirements
- confer with developers, designers and contractors during planning stages of
design and construction.
Inspect buildings under construction.
Maintain accurate records of day to day activities and permanent files.
Issue notices of code violations, and when necessary, use court system to
achieve compliance - testifies in court regarding violations.
Investigates complaints and inspects existing hazardous buildings - abates
hazards via due process provided in Minnesota Statutes.
Prepares regular reports of department activities to governing body and
prepares annual budget.
Provides training for personnel under his Supervision.
Represents municipality at public informational meetings.
Serves as ex officio member of appeals board and often municipal planning
commission.
Usually involved in administration of ordinances, zoning enforcement and
municipal licensing laws.
Serves as Plumbing Inspector.
Serves and Rental Housing Inspector.
Performs other duties that may be assigned by municipal administration.
Desirable Qualifications:
Some college level work in administration of engineering. Several years
supervisory experience in construction trades for knowledge of the methods
and practices used. Knowledge of current developments and sources of 10
information in construction. Thorough knowledge of codes and orcinances.
Management ability for overall control of department activities and records,
including safety and welfare of persons involved in building projects.
Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships and to
communicate clearly, tactfully, decisively and impartially, the
requirements of the building codes and zoning ordinances..
Knowledge and experience in all phases and techniques of construction,
including civil, structural, mechanical (heating, air conditioning, plumbing).
Special Requirements:
State of Minnesota Depattment of Administration requires Certified Building _
Official - Class II for evaluation and inspection of all buildings within
the scope of State Building Code.
•
Ej
•
(612) 587 -5151
I T Y OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
.HINSON, MINN. 55350
Novanber 20, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
FR(M: GARY D. FLOM, CITY ALMINISTRAMR eqQ
SUBJECT: JANUARY 1, 1986, WAM ADJUS'iMIMS
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input fran employees or employee groins of the various
city departments on what the wage adjustment should be. -
Last year, as you may recall, this input took the form of memorandums
from the various employee groups or individuals.
Please forward any and all of your memorandums to either Hazel or
myself by December 3rd. We will copy your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per
their request twat the consumjer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through temb -r iqnU is available now, and
that shows an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.)
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) on December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
station. As you may recall, several employees or representatives
attended the meetings last year on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be merit
.Day adjustments, if any, for the previous twelve months' performance.
This item may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
GCS . .
't'r-r-PuLM-k- 1� e, �6 tpo,
hi'�L A
i12) 587 -5151
rY OF HUTCHINSON
ISHING TON A VENUE WEST
IINSON, MINN. 55350
November 20, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES (n,�
FFCM: GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY AUUNISTRATOR
SUBJBCT: JMUAKY 1, 1986, WXZ ADJUSTS
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input fran employees or employee groups of the various
city` departments on what the wage adjustment should be.
Fast year, as you may recall, this input took the form of me irandums
fran the various employee groups or individuals.
_ Please forward any and all of your memorandums to either Hazel or
myself by December 3rd. We will copy your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per
their request what the consumer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through §2ptew ter only is available now, and
that shows an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.)
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) on December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
station. As you may recall, several enplcyees or representatives
attended the meetings last year on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be merit
yW adjustments, if any, far the previous twelve months' performance.
This item may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
7D
•
•
•
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 20, 19$5
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
FROM: GARY D. PLO►!Z, CI'T'Y A KMISTRATOR 42
SUBJECT: JANUARY 1, 1986, WAGE ADJUSDGWS
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input fran employees or employee groups of the various
city departments on what the wage adjustment should-be. -
Last year, as you may recall, this input took the form of memrandumtis
from the various employee groins or individuals.
Please forward any and all of your memnrandumLs to either Hazel or
myself by Decenber 3rd. We will copy your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per
their request what the consumer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through tender ml is available now, and
that shows an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) on December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
station. As you may recall, several employees or representatives
attended the meetings last year on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be merit
.Wy adjustments, if any, for the previous twelve months' performance.
This item may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
12) 587 -5151
rY OF HUTCHINSON
%SHINGTON AVENUE WEST
INSON, MINN. 55350
November 20, 1905
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EKPLOYEES
Elm: GVff D. PLprZ, CITY AM43NISTRAMR �Q
SUBJB=: JXTXM 1, 1986, KVZ ADJUS'ft4M
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input fram employees or employee groups of the various
city departmexits on what the wage a -djustment should M.
Last year, as you may recall, this input took the form of memorandums
from the various employee groups or individuals.
Please forward any and all of your memorandums to either Hazel or
myself by December 3rd. We will copy your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per 16
their request what the consumer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through tember 2n7 is available now, and
that shows an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.)
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) on December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
staticn. As you may recall, several employees or representatives
attended the meetings last year on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be meri t
,y adjustments, if any, for the previous twelve mmths' performance.
This item may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
!'�
(6-12) 587 -5151
HU1lH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
Wr November 20, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
FRC'M: GARY D. PIOM, CTrY AZMINISrRATOR 4?
SUBJDCI': JANUARY 1, 1986, WAGE ADJUSBE24TS
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input from employees or employee groups of the various
city departments m what the wage adjustment should -be. -
Last year, as you may recall, this input took the form of memorandums
from the various employee groups or individuals.
Please forward any and all of your memorandums to either Hazel or
myself by December 3rd. We will cony your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per
their request what the consumer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through tei fx only is available now, and
that shoos an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.)
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) an December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
station. As you may recall, several employees or representatives
attended the meetings last year_on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be mri
.Wy adjustments, if any, for the previous twelve months' performance.
This iten may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 20, 1985
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
FROM: GARY D. PI=, CI'T'Y- AIIMINISTRATOR �Q
SUBJFX,T: JANUARY 1, 1986, AGE ADOUS'n4WS
At the November 12, 1985, regular council meeting, I was authorized
to obtain input fran employees or employee groins of the various
city departments on what the wage adjustment should be.
Last year, as you may recall, this input took the form of memorandums
from the various employee groups or individuals.
Please forward any and all of your memorandums to either Hazel or
myself by December 3rd. We will copy your responses and provide the
input to all council members.
For your information, Hazel will be advising the city council per
their request what the consumer price index was for the past 12
months. (The index through §Mtemter oral is available now, and
that shows an increase of about 3.3% in Minnesota.)
The city council will discuss this topic at their special council
meeting (open to the public) on December 5 at 7 p.m. at the fire
station. As you may recall, several employees or representatives
attended the meetings last year on a voluntary basis.
Lastly, the city council has not decided if there will be meri t
i2ay adjustments, if any, for the previous twelve months' performance.
This item may also be discussed at the December 5th meeting.
cc: Mayor and council
r
az4t-�'111
1...:t.,T�a'
Ll
E
•
•
fHUTCHINSON, 12) 557 -5151
�TY OF HU r �, �G��O:� C'� �i
SHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: NOV. 27, 1985
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: — RALPH NEUMANN — ----------- — — — — — — — — — —
SUBJECT: COST OF LIVING INCREASE
------------------------------
Recently I had a meeting with employees in my departments
to discuss a fair and equitable request for a cost of living salary
adjustment effective January 1, 1986.
After a general discussion on this subject each employee was
requested to fill in a questionaire stating what they felt in their
heart was a good solution. As you can see, an across the board increase
was predominant in this survey.
DEPARTMENT
NAME
Street
Eugene Baasen
' 5.07.
Duane Dascher
$50.00 Month
Curt Paulsen
CPI Index
Eldon Barkeim
3.0 % - -4.0%
Doug Meier
6.0%
Larry Karg
5.0%
Earl Alsleben
Motor Pool
Ken Wichterman
Cemetery
Floyd Groehler
Water Dept.
Dick Nagy
4.0%
Dick Ebert
Waste Treatment
Randy DeVries
4.0%
Merle Meece
4.07.
Henry Heinecke
City Hall
Phil Forcier
Director
Ralph Neumann
COST OF LIVING REQUEST
INSURANCE SURVEY
5.5%
Excellent
5.0%
"
' 5.07.
Good
$50.00 Month
Excellent
CPI Index
"
3.0 % - -4.0%
"
6.0%
Good
5.0%
Excellent
5.0%
Good
4.0%
Good
4.0%
Good
4.0%
Good
4.0%
Good
4.0%
Good
4.07.
Excellent
CPI Index
Excellent
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective-January
1, 1986 be
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: F-XCELLENT
COOD
FAIR
POOR
i
COULD BE IMPROVED
SIGNED
' w. w, CI'rY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
T feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
-.ost of living increase effective January
I fee:. our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
COOT)
FAT
DOOR
COULD BE IMPROVED
r
S ICNH
FOR THE CT`rY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1, 1986 be - -- 7/4 crc-, u.`se XAY ii c
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
nre: EXCELLENT
GOOD
SIC
PAIR
POO'?
COULD RE Tmppnvpn
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1, 1986 be
7 6
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
GOOD
r.ATR
P00!.
COULD BE IMPROVED
SIGNED
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living" ncrease effective •J/a/npti�a►ry ; our cost of living increase effective-January
1, 1986 be - - 3% A-- `7� Io 1, 1986 be - A;' A'
c
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits ( I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT are: EXCELLENT
GOOD GOOD
FAIR FAIR
POOR � POOR
COULD BE IMPROVED COULD BE IMPROVED
r
SIGNED SIGNED
0
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1. , 1986 be 1,V Esc -2'e_e �%vy
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
COULD BE IMPROVED
SIGNED d
G
'S
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1.1 19 A6 be _ $SC), 0 u 1d
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
GOOD
FAIR
POOR
i
COULD BE IMPROVED
` q)
SIGNED Cj
FOR THE C?TY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective Januar
re�
1., 1986. be — � • � 0 R
e r 4z-.
I fee' bur health and dental fringe enefits
are: E•`"CELLENT
COOD
FA?R
POOR
COULD BE ?MPROVED
SIGNED QZ�
rPe ee/ utf o, meie i,-K-
E7 a C� /Z / ,1k
(9
!' '"'T' CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
1 feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
,ur cost of living increase effective January
! , 1986 be
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
Tire, !:YCET,.ENT ----
rnn�
"ATT
COULD BE IMPROVED
SIGNED __ 1,7 4� ti 71 c z9 Cc S C.'t/r e
0
FOR THE CI'T'Y COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of livir increase effective January
1, 1986 be y 70
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
GOOD
FAIR
POO`.?
1
COULD BE IMPROVED
0
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1, 1986 be
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are : EXCELLENT
1000 X
FAIR
P0O
COULD BE IMPROVED
_:y y
SIGNED SIGNED
Ck c-
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of living increase effective January
1, 1986 be
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT
GOOD _ 'Z
SIGNED
FAIR
POOR
r
COULD BE IMPROVED
0
CT.'rY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
,,!ir cost of living increase effective January
91% be u
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
F:XCEI,LENT _ L
COOD
r'A? R
COULD BE IMPROVED
� A
SICISIED
FOR THE CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
I feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
our cost of livir.gdt� crease effective January
1, 1. 986 be - ;
I fee'. our health and dental fringe benefits
are: EXCELLENT•/
000D
PAIR
COULD BE IMPROVED
SIGNED
""' '''!!!: CITY COUNCILS CONSIDERATION:
T feel a fair wage adjustment regarding
,- cost of living increase effective January
„� � 6 be
I feel our health and dental fringe benefits
i- '- CEL -ENT - ��
GOOD
S IGNHD
rATR
COULD BE IMPROVED
Ll
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: James Marka, Building Inspector
RE: Cost of Living
In regard to the Cost of Living Adjustment, I feel the adjustment should be
no less than the C.P.I.
I would, also, like to see the Council become more involved with department
positions, so merit decisions would reflect professionalism and
responsibility, instead of longevity.
JM/pv
�� - Ins.,
James Marka
Building Inspector
•
(6l2) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO:- Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Market Adjustment
I met with the employees of the Engineering Department relative to Market
Adjustment. It was their opinion, based on all data they had available,
that the City should consider 4.0% for 1986 Market Adjustment.
MVP/pv
,?.,4��' - �-
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
TO: CITY COUNCIL
The employees of the transit department have experienced
the same cost of living increase as others have.
It is our request that a cost of living increase
equal to the consumer price index be granted this year. -
•
(612) 587 -5151
l T Y OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
.'HINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 3, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council ------------ - - - - --
FROM: Clerical Staff ---------------- - - - - --
SUBJECT. 1986 Wage Adjustment ------------------------------
It is the concensus of the Clerical Staff that the 1986 Wage Adjustment
be at least 3.3% which is the same as the current consumer price index.
We feel this is a fair amount since the Hospital employees have received
a 3.5% adjustment.
We strongly urge that merit increases be considered as usual. Without them
there is no way for advancement. A consideration might be to change merit
increases from the first of the year to an eaplcyee's anniversary date.
0 Yh Cu�
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE November 28, 1985
TO Gary Plotz, City Administrator
FROM Sgt. John C. Gregor
VIA Chief Dean O'Borsky
SUBJECT January 1, 1986, Wage Adjustments
I have discussed the January 1, 1986 wage adjustments with the Police
Department personnel and it is felt that a 4% to 8% wage adjustment would be
adequate.
These figures were arrived at by looking at the CPI which is currently
about 3.3% in Minnesota and also comparing what other employee groups in our
area have settled for.
Examples are:
Custodial Engineers District 423
16 Custodians District 423
Auxiliary Personnel District 423
Litchfield Police Department
Meeker County
Hutchinson Hospital
77-�
Z
U CON
NOS E�
n
L�
2 Year Contracts
5.9%
&
6.3%
6.1%
&
5.9%
6.9%
&
6.4%
4.75%
&
4.75%
4.0%
&
4.0%
3.5%
Respectively,
�/0/ �. �
John �C. Gregor, Sgt.
. d / i ilL Ol 3YYVAaiaa1avao
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson
�. �. CounPRrOver a Y pact
. t
lfOr. City.! ,. ica" a artmen ai1�'b y
�h PO, �.'•I.f,^•�.i.�,,,� F p � ,.S•
,A'+ The � city ''council' Monday 7 of present'residentl&I property improvements at the municipal
nlght. :approved•` a .; two ` year, -k owned by Auguatana Homes to
: liquor store. `Plans call for
Mary contract for _ the eom -, J`.k�, parking space would require a, adding roof insulation and re-
,,y. r,, ,. , ,, munity s police • department V:1y-s ��,,�aue * ",.,from;, ,, the'.., , vamping the entrance to make
«', `•' with the agreement eztending' a #city t' the structure. more energy effi-
g year 1986. , f't''^ Work on the off - street park ;. cient. i
throu h the
''Members of the police , de. +�1ng project could start later in ,•' Stan 'Hydeen and Dale
;'„ partment ,.are representtd by: ,the summer; it,was pointed out ; Smolnisky were ' named to a
`= Teamsters, :'Union'Lccal, No. at :Monday': meeting. i 'zt.;.. council committee which will
+ �` '' ': }. r " >� • : The council approved.cailing<<' ";'meet with the school board to
m4''Ths eoMrast pFW for pay in. �^ for.' bids on�the Civic Arena discuss overall. 'use .'.of city.
+ , ,`,! .;,a*Wea for Pon" Parem d of 1) hnprovement project "which in- ;. facilities by the school district.
, S� abort 4.75 pertoot lo, aaeh st ,4;;;volv_es adding to the senior citi- In a final action, tht council
sit tort yeses. dun : facilities fats the :arena's , :,'approved a motion to start
department's' two sor•,tVy community loom and expand- action toward acquiring a
1i � y P s. 9 � 8
"• ' ts and five patrolmen ,ate ing;locker,room:space near the ' •matching grant through the
by •the ;contract. r* "" ice, surface. IRest room facilities: .t. Minnesota Historical Society to
1,, . • ; Under the new contirsct 'r{ accessible from the outside for ° do necessary repairs on the
°. • ; swages are pegged to an hourly;, ?' summer use art also part of thee:. vGAR building, which is owned
`c`.''.rate with the starting hourly ' rremodeling' pplans.%! ; ` :' Y by the .City of Litchfield.. `t "
r' .:pay for patrolIn ter at.S8.3Q The council'ivill consider the ,.; : r The grant, if appmvdd,
rfor 1965 agd 59.03tfoi'-1986: bids at its July $ mating t:_ would provide half the cost of ;
' , +`.. ! From Wis figure patrolmen The' council also approved , needed improvements on the ,
! ; r =' jan,move up the pay scale to g, , calling for bids on a project for building.
} t maximum'. of $11.09 p& hoUr j#
top of $11.62 per
.m 1985 and atop /400
t` jhour in 1%6.," ' �v . °. ,•i 1KY'i''�? t', . -1.'. •I ( L -
Maximum pay in the police
. department is achieved after y
' : ' `k , -,; foot years of service :'.Also in-
are full benefits Includ
Ing four weeks of vacation after;
years of, service.
s The top ulW ,f ., sergeant ,
t , , 4, .,q patrolman :was'• set�at , $12
#. r
- ,, 4�,,.,, hour in the'curnnt year and
�' 't; , •' 512.57 per hour In 1986.
The oeunell heard a reportl
fross' Judy •' Oestrelch • on the
activities of " the '' Ploneerland
l ' :` r =t' >• } Library System. Judy L am of
Litchfield's representatives sag
the +Ploneerland Library. Sys;:
',.J tam's board of dk"tors
•1 Y; "� ,:'r ?: Under a tentative 'budget
`presented 'at, the,(meeting.'
1f + "'`� � ?Litchfield's contribution to the$
• gg
`regional library would be set at
`;.536,864" for'.' 1986;'" up slightly fiong the L 1985 figure of
11. 0 ; ° "' '536.206. ��: ',,.eau . •}.t{'
Meeker Couety'i budget
'.
contribution figure_'t will be
160,147 • in 1986.' Jn ' 1985 the
county was: as to contri�gte.
159,072 but'gave 554,694.:+x,,
Oestrelch said that if Meeker
1 >+ ,1+. not •mat its. f ill,budget c
Oick O Fischer Teresa Lynn Failing, a senior
son 48
Hutchinson High School and
at
daughter of Larry and Marcia
Falling, has been accepted for
utation
Ze• , 1n. TLC
.
ft 1111141 Will M"
ding
I VWW Of Sp" Lam...
111vilkiwinte rOCK"
lonaMp
"bligation tour
TOME
f275-3W
womon
ults
served
Candies
lot
X
Hutchinson a
enrollment at Moorhead .State
.1 11 'S
University this fall.
"w
IVW 14 Ow
Moorhead State.' ."n6w" in its 7
97th year, is one of seven state
bor hel 'eilp
7
universities in Minnesota. it of-'.', bor
Nelp'h
pinF n four inches on the Hutchinson area with another
fers majors .in 50 - f ields And Jack ppner helped out is neig or on Fourth
,:4. graduate programs in 22". Avenue by blowing snow off the driveway"' follow. Inch or so failing Friday night and Saturd y mor n.
Thursday's snowfall. The storm dumpithree to '.:,:ins.
4: 1 Wr. Staff hot o
%40
Y;
Z
'A
41
Area 1
news
CV
Christmas play for with Millie
Beneke piaywrig hi
,
a nd created their own play with
children planned
-4:` „her assistance. i
During ..their workshop .- ex-
_7 CLENCOE. . The wonder 6i.:.`;�irience, the 'children 'had "an,
*i.- Christmas, , '.the wonder - ;,�bf.. -,;.opportunity .,.,to �,,meet 4 n
!,children ''*and the. ., rnagic�"of.-t_observe_ two. professional direc-'
theater have come together to 1';-',tors during two productions and
create an original ...Christmas to watch rehearsals fpr'both
play to be performed for kids . of shows. They were present for
ail il ages at the Crystal Theatre . in pl4y"akuditions and the children
Glencoe' at 8 p.m. Dec'.'13,'. - 14 ''previewed both shov;s and held
and 15 with two matinees At 2:30 critique - sessions. They -.also
P.M. Dec. 14 and 15. The learned some things about set-*
i
original play, "Christmas Cat design and -building, lights,
and the Schultz Family," is the sound, props, costumes' and
final, product of the Buffalo make-up.
Creek Players Children's The children learned about
Theatre/Workshop. some. of the financial obliga-
Since mid-August, 25 Glencoe tions in theater. Under the
area children have been involv7 guidance of Barbara Holmgren
ed in the Children's Theatre/- they decided to sell candy bars:
Workshop. The children learned Thus a contest was begun and
movement, mime and principles the children sold 2,400 candy
of acting from Tom. Feehan,-. bars.
director, and Melissa Beneke, The production is made possi-
assistant. They explored theater ble in part by a grant from
'WIT I 1 : southwest M"innesota Arts and .,and has voted not to pay 6e full
- Humanitie's Council with funds
budget request for 1986.-.—..~;
from. the Minnesota State Arts
-.,-C.--Alvin. Johnson, a. Meeker.
-Board,- appropriated. ,by the
"County 'commissioner,:'
.
Legislature.
...that :the 'commissioners' had.'
-t 4-percent in-.
.,.'�:rotei!'. o pay a.
'crease over last year's contribu-
K;
ion
t but it was $3,800 less
DisS il libra y
th e amount reqie! ted.4-04,
to s e'ja'.
DASSEL - --'The Dassel Library * ---,
'
MA e ral.S?e.. -" `
k. er t� o
will close,Jih.r 1.1ibiiriah
.e. I "
rc unty � laries A 1. ,
Gladys Paulson—In *..:letter,'
received word, that her emlA oy-
ment4wilVbe-wirminated as-of
`-°-,LITCHFIELD .—.'Meeker Coun-
Jan. 1 unless the situation regar-
ty commissioners agreed "reluc-
ding Meeker County's participa-
tantly". to increase salaries* of
tion in the Pioneerland Library
' county employees by 4 percent
System is changed before that
in 1986.
date. The policy also affects
Eighteen months ago a two-
Grove City and Cosmos.
year union contract was signed
Meeker County has not con-•
calling for a 4-percent increase
tributed the requested amount
in both 1985 and 1986. Apprpx-
to the Regional Library system
imately two-thirds of the county
for the past three fiscal years
employees are in a union..
hears appeals from
organizations requestin
Schaefer said, and c
.' determine how donatii
be allocated, Emphasis i
on organizations that co
�.. 'F directly to the commui
;,r s �,�• tom, ti:. - on medical research thi
g , .i - r ,��- :. r. benefit local residents.
Happily awaiting the school bell? k y �' • a Money is raised thre
t by individual contri
Run reds of Hutchinson Elementary School students gather outside `�
8 equipment or play a quick game of touch football ^- through a business drive
the building each morning waiting for the doors to open to another - through deduction.
day of learning. It is a time to greet friends, -climb playground � = N Staff photo, owe a large i
. 1 '� }�t !'.`S L' . %� ',I• d - - - .�... _
thanks to Co. i
�s� Y +�'i� �..:; '`�, -�,, ,• � r ,� "than 3M
�' ~^ employees," Schaefer
► , .> ^ a 4, Z 4 the company's payroll
} i x .• r {'i- , _ .T �i rte.,... ' yp�,r-• �.t_�r. }�',i4.+. 1.'.aati Lion drive:.�'We hope tl
i• "�` , t Y- w "..1[• , .ik..'. t .I �.l;�ai� 'A ".s 'v> 1 . v- i..:.c t ! .�•'' Y "'� .,�._,
ti- Hos ital Boar a� b, ,, ; = ►r �:
• -'.- •a i+� y,a}.«L. v '... .,A _ .. {} `}f. .}' ♦ pv 44'Y }: 7 ��, fj a i �..
-!►. t.. 1' ; y ^ �fv. r .sy� .::.,:'� '�Y!• v , i .` 'r r .• v �>r� ' +ey?; "' :'ai .'x..s 'iP , .••� -.; I:YU.I �. ,�. 1 -, -.
• - y,. _ _ . R . U. �**tt �.;. • d .,i %. -'os ital fins..f a p t ew a u� roblems considers.
j• -•`� _, d,.� :..,.. r ;. �. ; r.. 1 ..., t.•`�i ,. , X: rte:, ti 4.r.�:F'.•,k_, k_`� �; • "': ,.:'..;;. .`.
By KATHLEEN OGREN- .The'state. comparable' worth '.:will bejfrozerr;~fo'r example,:. an !!., policy: presented, but'. didn't increase. The extra hour
Staff Writer t'i- k i k : «r,; ;law;calls for uaC'pay iri . cum- there's a 25.cent-,difference in ' make a decision on iron a' con- ; •in new services and
t 7. 8
w Hutchinson �- Community: pa. rakjei jobs; eliminating , another area; plus afuse- to-high sultant- r ; ` '{iaeY care;" such as ultrasow
Hospital. is ,iii''.: "pretty good discrepancies based on gender « a range' needs; to'be- established °� '�
..� ,- a »"`"', r'! ; i �' r:. mographY. obstetrics..
shape,' when incomes to posse -.� fibs hospita! s committee for salaried employees �^+-r f �' .' " tant''altoholrc ro i
�.. l�.rst11•� {, ,.
bee inequities in employee pay, found tittle concern in the "men -:.-:7.. While there' "are no sanctions Satary 111CCedSe'�, ` "_ 'mental. health outpa:
' but Administrator Phil Graves- ,tb women''' areas; but there are for .not coin I in with. the flaw vices.
-in
P y g' _•:
still would like to hire a consul ; some inequmes,.` "women to and..-. there -, haven't.. been. "*any ? '' Employee salaries i
tant to examine the system, :. s ; women" areas, Craves Bard disgruntled' employees a, good ;...The - • board also - voted those in the metropo'
Craves presented a. new All the differences:'. will be -;' personnel plan is good. manage- unanimously for: a' 3,5- percent but in' line with sc
hospital policy to the Board of worked. out, he added, even ment. Craves said, and a consuf� : sala'ry increase for'; hospital' _hospitals, said P_ersor
Trustees Tuesday that outlined though the only reporting re- tant could examine the existing 'emp 6yyees.ifie inc ota o dinatar . Linda" Zie
Hutchinson's plan. The . pro- quired by the state is that of ine- criteria and protect the hospital $117,000-will -be-added to the'—, presented the results
cedure calls for a - committee of'! quities' involving women ` and .. from conflicts.:, ' .. ' net increase in' operating ex- and benefits survey.
the administration and the per- "mew- ,: ` � A �, ;; For an evaluation and •recom- ' pense. Last year's increase also Salary is not ar
sonnet 'department to use the .' ' Probjems f arise. with : I the- mendations, a consultant could was 3.5 percent. - , -' :employee turnover,
state's system to classify jobs. state's system one 'Craves cost in the'area.of $3,000, said ? More than-25,
000 additional ; ;instead 'it's usually
The findings will be reported to thinks is too big fora hospital, Bill Rosenow,•• assistant
ad--employee hours are being add.;',.,, with a different
the state. The hospital missed Hutchinson's size. Currently, the , ministrator. ':::: , ed for 1986, Rosenow told the "` transferred that
the state's Oct.1 deadline. changes are minor. one position The board ' accepted the board, but patient rates won't employee to leave.
.� . '�. -�: +�: t . :'�. ... .� », _ .. ... .... ,. ... .:. �" . � ._ .. .., ;c•'1.' -P.' ::J' .. 7�_.�.ci 1:a;'- i"-a,;::�i.- ter+ =•v k'.•ti -:• ..i. . ,..';> r..
0
V
J '`
Contract ne otiation
Board. ratifies custodial'
ustodial 4greemen
t
$y TERRY DAVIS 7 management aide to work with
Staff.Writer.. junior- senior high school energy Y;
, an elementary student. it also,. -audit, and td:work with.Hallberg
Tho,custodial engineers, is the - ;'approved a secretary lit posi- Engineerin&, tor = complete the i c
'.third school employee group to tion in .consumer homemaking study,;: a.;
r,: ,.....•: , x a l
come•: to term3.. following for four hours •a day and a com- .•Placed on file the 1985' school ' !x
ratification of a two -year agree puter operater la in student ac_- census . -which shows ` 4;747 r .: a_: •�
mment- ;Tuesday by: 423. counting or three hours
8 per ..� district residents under .the age
Board of Education. -day. A secretary. III position at of 21 compared to 4,620 in 1984
%Tema `include a ,5 P- pe'(cent .• Hutchinson -,Area Vocational and 4,557 in`1983.
^� .-e'w
•. verage mcrcase ,the �f�rst' year _s- :.Technical, 'Institute.(HAVTq for:; •;..- ,•Authorizec� up to $500 fors a � � •
r ..
`6.�°rtfW second, plus the ,`four hours a day also was OK'd !:` tele- media "stud
y`� • committee)
• m adjuit 7z nti' ;7 to .% ringe and will be filled by Debra Thor Board rn )rhea "DA i :Perrino
Is- :' ;benefits d earlier for :,.wardson: - . _ Superintendent Clenn - Matejka a
' tthie ' stodial group `:Those ,- —The; ..board*.'
.board - approved the and George 'Halonen' of. HAVTI
*L`enef�ndude an additional; employment of Richard Pachan_';: were. appointed tosecve:on the
�.
S,Op�,;,gf;ge insuJance and S1Q as a full -time elementary Fusto-l�,committ ,. Sanoy Green was
y" iee7 month -- towards family dian "beginning Oct 28. Roberti--.,* a ointe alternate :r
_f,. - i�'' Hand; a graphic' arts _tQchnician '.- •Heard 'reports from principals
.health insurance,,ti, .;
The custodians' earlier•agree -'''at HAVTI; was transferred from Vince Ross, Bill Snyder and Key
=spent calls for increases of 6.1 long -term casual to permanent',, Prihodalon the first meetings of
;and 5.9 percent The Hutchinson full -time employment. •:_, -.,, parent; advisory_ committees for
;Association of Auxiliary Person - A lane change was approved theirrespective buildings
"jnel reached agreement with the for secondary school instructor •Appointed. " board.. membei
district a month ago calling for a ' Sandra Tracy. :; :, • :;% •�.E : , -: r 'Luc
ille "Arlt to serve'on the Com-
�.9.1mcent increase the first In other action, the board. .- ,.prehensive Arts Planning Pro-
,year and 6.4percent hike the se- •Accepted a bid of $52,421 from gram committee .•• ._•.: -.:, s __ - ' "• • - "" ' ' -
ycond. St. Cloud Window to complete •Approved semimonthly .claims. �_,
1 _Negotiators .for..the district the of the elementary and other business totaling neaF F'ghtfighters sprayed water
'-and Hutchinson Education -'school window• project. - Bids ly $1,489,000 (above) on the Randy Rose home
,Association were slated to meet were called for an infrared scan- •Learned of a meeting with:area to prevent it from catching fire.
lWednesday. Salary is the main ning system for HAVTI's legislators Nov. 15, and of the Embers from, the blazing barn.
issue remaining to be resolved. nondestructive testing 'program, .: donation to the. high school of- across ..the road were. swept.
!.According to the latest figures and for a suburban -type vehicle file education department of an along by strong south winds.
supplied by the Minnesota . to replace the district's '1981 Apple disk drive computer from Firefighters became herdsmen t
'School Board Association, 52 Ford Escort fright) to rescue 22 hogs. ,
districts have reached •A Chairman Gordon. g >,
Another. 12. or 3 market - size .-
t *Approved sending a. letter to.; rHeard a report by Matejka on a ho s were killed and two were
agreements with their in- : the city by Chairman George , .,proposal to change the gover- g
4utchered. ,.
'structors. The average first -year Gordon stating the board's posi -' Hance of vo-techs. from. local Staff photos by Terry Davis ' � '• ��`, ' r `;
'increase is $1,750 (6.93 percent), tion of non - opposition to tax in- school board control to regional fµ:a
.and $1,678 (6.12 percent) for the crement financing for a spur boards.
second year. track in the industrial park. *Set the next regular meeting
In other emolovee- related •Allthnri7Pd the a*AMinictratinn f. c•In ...,. kl.,.. :., .a, r < _■
.,
•
•
•
United States /,`
Department `� *��
of Labor ��
Bureau of Labor Statistics Washington, D.C. 20212
Technical, historical contact: USDL: 85-460
(202) 523 -1165
Media contact: (202) 523 -1913 FOR F49ZME:
a � • i� ••. � i�. �• a is �•
10:00 A.M. E
Tuesday, Oct
The Employment Cost Index (ECI) increased 1.6 percent in the 3 months ended in
September 1985, the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics re-
ported today. For the year ended in September 1985, the ECI rose 4.9 percent,
dawn from 5.1 percent for the year ended in September 1984. -The ECI measures -
changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries, and employer costs
for employee benefits.
The 1.6 percent increase in oompensaticn costs in the June - September period was
above the 1.3 percent gain in the same period a year ago. The higher rate of
change resulted from larger compensation increases for private industry workers
(1.3 percent, up from 0.8 percent). State and local government workers, on the
other hand, registered a 3.4 percent increase in June- September 1985, about the
same as the 3.5 percent gain a year earlier. Compensation cost changes for State
and local government workers are heavily concentrated in the June - September quar-
ter, whereas those for private industry workers are mare widely dispersed
throughout the year.
For the year ended in September 1985, compensation cost increases (4.9 percent)
were below gains a year ago (5.1 percent). The slowdown was registered primarily
for State and local government workers (6.0 percent, down from 6.6 percent). For
Private industry workers, compensation casts increased at about the same rate as
a year earlier (4.7 percent and 4.8 percent, respectively).
********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
* This release provides for the first time, estimates of
* quarterly change in compensation costs, and in wages and
* salaries only, for workers in health services. Data are
* provided for workers in private industry, in State and
* local governments, and in the two sectors combined.
* *
* These new series are part of the Federal government's
* effort to improve statistical programs for service- produc- *
* ing industries, i.e., transportation and public utilities; *
* trade; finance, insurance, and real estate; service indus- *
* tries; and governments. As part of the effort, this
* release also presents for the first time, series for the
* service - producing sector as a whole as well as for goods-
* producing industries (mining, construction, and
* manufacturing) combined.
********************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Y
2
In contrast to the slight decline in the rate of compensation cost increases,
over- the -year wage and salary gains (5.0 percent) were substantially higher than
those a year ago (4.3 percent). A higher rate of wage and salary increase was
found for private industry workers (4.8 percent, up from 4.1 pest), but not for
State and local government workers (5.6 percent, dawn from 5.8 percent).
Over-the-
year wage and salary increases for nonunion workers in private industry
continued to outstrip those of union workers, as has been the case for the past
2 years. For the year ended in September 1985, nonunion pay gains averaged
5.4 percent, compared with 3.6 percent for union workers.
Wage and salary advances in private industry also varied by occupation and indus-
try group over the September 1984 -85 period. Among white- collar workers, pay
gains ranged from 4.2 percent for clerical workers to 8.0 percent for sales
workers '(the most volatile ECI series, heavily influenced by commission earnings).
The range for blue - collar workers was from 3.4 percent for nonfarm laborers to
4.8 percent for craft and kindred workers. The variation in average pay gains by
industry group in the year ended in September 1985 was from 2.6 percent for cenr- _
struction to 7.6 percent for finance, insurance, and real estate (also strongly
influenced by commission earnings).
The September 1985 ECI level stood at 128.4, based on June 1981 =100. The ECI
covers private industry (excluding farms and households) and State and local
government workers. It is not seasonally adjusted.
0
�J
� M
COMPENSATION
able 1. Employment Cost Index by occupation and industry group ,L/
(Not seasonally adjusted)
Series
Indexes (June 1981=100)
n
sea for
I
I Sept.
June
I Sept.
( Sept.
June
Sept.
( Sept.
June
Sept.
1984
1985
1 19
1985
1
198
Civilian workers Z / ........................I
122.4
126.4
( 128.4
( 1.3
0.7
1.6 I
5.1 I
4.6 I
4.9
Workers, by occupational group
I
I
!I
I
(
I
I
White - collar workers .................
124.0
128.3
i 130.7
1.6
I .8
I 1.9
( 5.4 I
5.1 I
5.4
Blue - collar workers .................
119.6
123.1
I 124.4
S .8
1 .7
1 1.1
I 4.2 I
3.8 I
4.0
Service workers .....................
124.6
128.0
( 130.9
I 2.0
I .2
2.3 i
6.8 i
4.8 i
5.1
Workers, by industry division
I
I
Goods- producing J/..
120.1
123.9
124.9
jj 1.0
.6
( .8 I
4.4 I
4.2 I
4.0
Manufacturing.. ................:�
120.4
I 124.6
125.5 I
1.1
I .6 1
.7 1
4.7 I
4.6 I
4.2
Service - producing _q/ ................
123.9
1 127.9
130.7 I
1.5
1 .8 1
2.2 1
5.5 1
4.8 1
5.5
Services ..... ....................
128.8
I 132.6
136.4 1
2.6
.5 I
2.9 I
6.4 I
5.7 I
5.9
Health services.... ...........
�5
-
I -
- I
-
.5 I
1.6 1
- 1
- I
Public administration /...........
126.9
1 130.3
I 134.2 +
2.6
i .2 i
3.0 i
5.9 i
5.3 i
5.8
Nonmanufacturing .....................1
123.3
127.2 'I
129.7 I
1.4
i .8 i
2.0 i
5.2 i
4.6 i
5.2
Private industry workers ¢ / ..............I
121.1
125.2
I 126.8
I .8
i .8
i 1.3
i 4.8
i 4.2
i 4.7
Workers, by occupational group
White - collar workers .................
122.4
127.1
128.8
.8
I 1.0
1.3
I 5.1
I 4.7
( 5.2
Blue- collar workers... ..........
1193
122.8
124.0
.8
I .7
1.0
( 4.1
I 3.7
I 3.9
Service workers........ .............
123..2
126.5
i 128.8
1.7
! .2
1.8
i 7.0
i 4.4
i 4.5
Workers, by industry division
I!
j
I(
I
I
Goods - producing A / ...................
119.9
123.8
I 124.6
.9
.7
.6
1 4.4
4.2
=
3.9
Service - producing g / ................
122.2
126.4
I 128.7
.7
I 1.0
I 1.8
I 5.2
4.2
I 5.3
State and local.government workers.......
128.8
132.0
136.5
1 3.5
.2
3.4
I 6.6
I 6.1
I 6.0
Workers, by occupational group
i
I
I
White - collar workers .................
129.7
132.9
137.6
3.8
.3
3.5
I 6.7
6.3
I 6.1
Blue-collar workers ..................
125.0
128.5
131.9
2.2
.3
2.6
( 5.9
5.1
I 5.5
Workers, by industry division
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Services ............. .........
129.9
133.2
137.9
3.9
1 .3
I 3.5
( 6.7
( 6.6
i 6.2
Hospitals and other services Z /...
127.9
131.5
134.1
1.8
I .3
2.0
( 5.6
4_6
4.8
Health services..
I .1
2.7
I!
i
i -
Schools.. ... .................
130.6
133.7
139.1
41.7
.2
4.0
I 7.1
I 7.2
I 6.5
Elementary and secondary.........
132.1
134.6
140.9
5.1
.1
4.7
I 7.1
I 7.1
( 6.7
Public administration 51 .............
126.9
130.3
134.2
2.6
.2
I 3.0
I 5.9
i 5.3
I 5.8
- Data not available.
NOTE% See footnotes at end of tables.
COMPENSATION i
Table 5. Employment Cost Index, private industry workers, by bargaining status, region, and area size $/
(Not seasonally adjusted)
NOTE= The indexes for these series are not strictly comparable to those for the aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
See footnotes at end of tables.
i 0
C�
Sept.
June
Sept.
Series
o
June
ep
ep
June
Sept.
Workers, by bargaining status
=
I
I
Union...... .. ... ....................
122.6
125.5
126.5
0.7
0.6
0.8 I
4.1
3.1 I
3.2
Goods - producing ,A/ . ..................
121.4
123.9
124.6
.8
.2
1.0
.6 I
1.2 I
4.2
3.8
2.9 I
3.6
2.6
4.0
Service - producing y, / ..................
124.5
128.0
129.5
.7
i
f
Manufacturing
121.6 I
124.2
125.0
.9 I
.0
.6 I
4.6 I
3.1 I
2.8
.........................
Nonmanufacturing ...................... •I
123.6
126.6
127.8
.7 I
1.0
.9
( 3.7 I
3.1 I
3.4
Nonunion... .. ... ....................
120.3
I 125.0
126.8
.9
1.0
1.4
I 5.2 I
4.9
I 5.4
.• .••
Goods- roducin9 i, ...........
118.4
123.5
124.4
1.1
.9
.7
2.0
4.4
5.6
I 5.5
I 4.4
I 5.1
( 5.7
Service- producing g / ...................I
121.4
125.8
I
128.3
.7
.9
Manufacturing .. ......................
I 119.3
124.8
125.7
1.2
1.0
.7
4.8
1 5.9
I 5.4
Nonmanufacturing ......................
120.7
125.1
I
( 127.3
.8
1.0
1.8
I
I 5.2
(
I 4.4
I 5.5
Workers, by region
I
I
I
I
(
I
Northeast............, .................
122.4
126.4
128.8
1.4
1.0
1.9
I 5.5
I 4.7
I 5.2
South.. .. .......
�Central)
120.7
125.2
126,5
.0
I .8
1.0
( 4.4
I 3.7
I 4.8
Midwest ( formerly�North .........
119.7
122.7
124.2
1.5
.6
1.2
I 5.1
4.1
I 3.8 .
Most ..... ...............................
122.5
127.9
129.1
.2
.9
.9
( 3.8
4.7
I 5.4
Workers, by area size
I
Metropolitan areas.. .......
121.5
119.0
125.7
122.5
127.3
123.9
.7
1.4
.8
1.3
1.1
( 4.7
I 4.9
4.2
4.3
( 4.8
1 4.1
Other areas .............................
.9
NOTE= The indexes for these series are not strictly comparable to those for the aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
See footnotes at end of tables.
i 0
C�
0 1 9
I WAGES AND SALARIES
Table 2. Employment Cost Index for wagew and salaries only, by occupation and industry group
(Not seasonally adjusted)
Series
Sept.
1984
June
1985
Se t.
a
une
1933
op
op
1
r�u
Sept.
Civilian workers Z / .......................
120.3
124.2
126.3
1.3
0.9
1.7
4.3
5.0
Workers, by occupational group
Fite- collar workers .:...............
122.2
126.4
128.8
1.5
1.0
1.9
4.7
5.0
5.4
Blue- collar workers ..................
117.0
120.5
122.0
.8
1.0
1.2
3.4
3.8
4.3
Service workers .....................
122.3
125.3
128.0
2.1
.4
2.2 '
6.3
4.6
4.7
Workers, by industry division
Goods- producing / ...................
117.6
121.5
122.5
.9
1.0
.8
3.8
4.3
4.2
Manufacturing.. ................
118.0
122.3
123.2
1.0
1.1
.7
4.1
4.7
4.4
Service - producing g/ .................
122.0
125.9
128.6
1.4
.9
2.2
4.7
4.6
5.4
Services ...........................
127.2
130.5
134.2
2.7
.6
2.8
5.9
5.4
5.5
Health services.. .........
-
-
-
-
.7
1.4
-
( -
-
Public administration A/...........
124.4
127.2
131.4
2.6
.2
3.3
5.2
4.9
5.6
Nonmanufacturing ....................
121.3
125.0
127.6
1.3
.9
2.1
4.5
4.4
5.2*
Private industry workers JL/ ..............
119.2
123.3
124.9
.8
1.1
1.3
4.1
4.3
4.8
Workers, by occupational group
I
White - collar workers .................
120.9
125.5
127.3
.8
1.2
1.4
4.3
4.7
5.3
Blue- collar workers .................
11¢.7
120.3
121.7
.7
1.0
1.2
3.4
3.8
4.3
Service workers .....................
121.2
124.4
126.3
1.6
.5 I
1.5
6.6
I 4.3
4.2
Worker-s, by industry division
1
Goods - producing A/ . ................
117.5
121.4
122.3
.9
1.0
.7
3.8
I 4.3
4.1
Service - producing g /..
120.6
124.8
127.0
.8
1.1
1.8
I 4.4
i 4.3
5.3
r,. State and local government workers.......
126.1
128.7
133.2
3.4
.2
I 3.5
I
5.8
I
i 5.5
I
i 5.6
Workers, by occupational group
I
I
White- collar workers .................
127.1
1 129.6
(! 134.3
3.8
.2
3.6
6.1 I
58
5.7
Blue-collar workers ..................
121.9
( 124.5
1 127.9
1.9
.2
2.7
4.7 i
4..1
4.9
Workers, by industry division
.. ..
Services.. ... ...... �
127.2
129.7
134.5
3.8
.2
3.7
6.2
5.9
5.7
Hospitals and other services Z /....
125.1
128.0
130.2
1.6
.2
1.7
4.5
4.0
4.1
Health services.. ..
.1
2.6
Schools.. ..... ...............
127.8
130.2
135.8
4 5
.2
4.3
6.6
6.5
6.3
Elementary and secondary.........
129.3
131.1
137.5
5.1
.2
4..9
6.8
6.6
6.3
Public administration A / .............
124.4
127.2
131.4
2.6
.2
I 3.3
5.2
4.9
5.6
- Data not available.
NOTE= See footnotes at end of tables.
WAGES AND SALARIES
I Table 6. Erployment Cost Index for jag and salaries only~, private industry workers, &/ by bargaining
atus, region, and area s#d ..
(Not seasonally adjusted)
Series
Ind June ft'
Sept.
1984
June
1985
Sept.
1985
o
June
e
I ept.
1984
June
1985
Sept.
1 1985
Workers, by bargaining status
I
I
Union...... �
.. .....................
Goodscproducingal/ .....................
119.8
118.1
123.0
121.3
124.1
I 122.2
0.7
1.1
0.9
II
I 3.3
3.4
3.6
Servica-produc ng y, % ...................
122.5
125.7
127.1
.8
1 .5
1.1
1.2
.7
1.1
3.5
2.8
3.5
3.1
3.5
I 3.8
Manufacturing ......
118.1
121.7
122.8
.9
I 1.1
,9
I 3.9
3.9
I
( 4.0
Nonmanufacturing .......................I
121.3
124.1
125.3
.5
1.1
I 1.0
i 2.5
( 2.8
1 3.3
Nonunion... ....................I
Goods- producing / . ...................i
118.8
116.9
123.4
121.4
125.2
122.3
.8
I 1.0
1 1.1
I 1.0
1.5
I 4.5
3.9
4.8
5.4
Service - producing % ...................I
119.9
124.4
126.9 i
.8
i 1.1
.7
2.0
4.8
4.9
4.6
4.6
5.8
Manufacturing ..........................=
117.9
122.8
( 123.7
1.2
( 1.1 I
.7
I
i 4.3
I
I 5.4
1
( 4.9
Nonmanufacturing ........................
1 119.2
123.6 I
125.9
.8
1.9
4.6 i
4.5 i
5.6
Workers, by region I
I
I
Northeast ...............................
120.5
124.6
126.8 i
1.3 =
1.3
1.8 I
4.5 I
4.8 I
5.2
.... .. .... ...
South. ..... .. .. .. ........�
<�ilidwest (formerly North Central).........I
119.0
117.8
123.4 I
121.1 I
124.8
122.5
.0 I
1.6 (
.9
1.3
1.1 I
12
4.1 I
3.7 I
4.9
West ....... ..............................i
120.0 I
125.1
126.6 I
.3
.9
1..2
4.4
3.0 i
4.4 I
4.6 i
4.0
5.5
Workers, by area size
I
I
Metropolitan areas .......................
119.5 I
123.8
125.5
.8
1
I
4.0 i
4.4 j
5.0
Other areas ..............................i
117.5 i
120.6 i
121.9 i
1.3
.8 i
1.1 i
4.6 i
4.0 i
3.7
NOTE: The indexes for these series are not strictly comparable to those for the aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
J./ The index measures changes in total compensation costs (wages, salaries, and employer costs
for employee benefits).
Z/ Includes private industry and State and local government workers and excludes farm, household,
and Federal government workers.
/ Includes mining, construction,. and manufacturing.
Includes transportation, public utilities, trade, finance, insurance, real estate, services,
and, where applicable, public administration.
Consists of legislative, judicial, administrative, and regulatory activitaes.'
¢/ Excludes farm and household workers.
/ Includes, for example, library, social, and health services.
$/ The index measures changes in total compensation costs (wages, salaries, and employer-'costs
for employee benefits). Farm and household workers are excluded.
eWSUnited States
Department 4eo�
of Labor
Bureau of Labor Statistics Washington, D.C. 20212
Historical, technical data: USDL: 85 -329
William Davis (202) 523 -1921
Edward Wasilewski (202) 523 -1921 FOR RELEASE: 10 :00 A.M. E.D.T.
Media Contact: Friday, August 16, 1985
Kathryn Hoyle (202) 523 -1913
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SETTLEMENTS
FIRST 6 MONTHS 1985 -
Major collective bargaining settlements reached for State and local
government workers during the first 6 months of 1985 provided average wage
adjustments of 4.9 percent in the first contract year and 5.1 percent
annually over the life of the contract, the U.S. Department of Labor's
Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. The settlements covered nearly
560,000 workers.
The Bureau's major collective bargaining series for State and local
government covers bargaining units with 1,000 workers or more. The series
includes data on wage change developments for 2.1 million workers, or about
one -half of the State and local government workers that bargain over wages.
The Bureau also measures compensation (wage and benefit costs)
adjustments in State and local government settlements covering 5,000
workers or more. Such settlements reached during the first half of 1985
provided compensation adjustments that averaged 4.7 percent in the first
contract year and 4.9 percent a year over the contract life. In addition
to data on settlements, this release includes information on wage changes
effective during the first half of the year that resulted from settlements
during the period, agreements reached-in earlier periods, and
cost -of- living adjustments (COLAs).
Settlements during the first 6 months of the year covered 558,000
workers, 55 percent of whom were in State government. There were, however,
737,000 workers, about two- thirds in State government, under contracts that
had expired or reopened but had not been renegotiated by June 30.
Fifty -four percent of the workers under settlements were employed in
general government and administration, twenty percent in education, and the
remainder in health care, transportation, and protective services.
Average (mean) wage adjustments were about the same in State as in local
government -- 4.9 and 4.8 percent, respectively, in the first-contract year.
Corresponding adjustments averaged 5.2 and 5.1 percent annually over the
contract life. Almost all State and local workers will receive a wage
increase during the contract term, and none will have a wage decrease.
However, no first -year wage increase was negotiated for 12 percent of local
government workers compared with 2 percent of State government employees.
- 2 -
i
Effective wage adjustments are those that result from (1) settlements
In the first 6 months of 1985, (2) deferred changes made under agreements
negotiated earlier, and (3) COLA provisions.
Average effective wage adjustments (in percent) in the first 6 months
of 1985 were$
For For
workers receiving all workers
a change (arorated)
All adjustments --------- ------- - - - - -- 4.8 1.6
New se- ttlements --- -- ------- -- - - -- -- 5.3 0.9
Deferred adjustments -- ---- -- - - - - - -- 4.5 0.8
COLA ------------------------- - - - - -- 0.8 1/
1/. Less than 0.05. percent.
Wage changes (only increases- -there were no decreases) put into effect
In the first 6 months of 1985 averaged 4.8 percent for the 717,000
workers who received them. When prorated over all 2.1 million workers
covered by major agreements in State and local government, wage adjustment
averaged 1.6 percent.
Only 2 percent of the State and local government workers under major
agreements (all in local transit) have COLA provisions, compared with 53
percent in the private sector. About 26,000 local government workers had
COLA reviews in the first half of 1985. Of these, 16,000 had COLA
increases averaging 0.8 percent. Wage adjustments stemming from COLA
reviews in the first 6 months of 1985 averaged 38 percent of the change in
consumer prices during the COLA review period.
Nearly 1.1 million State and local government workers under major
agreements may be involved in bargaining during the second half of 1985.
There are 737,000 workers under 177 major contracts that had reopened or
expired by June 30,1985, but had not been renegotiated or ratified. A
little over two - fifths of the workers were in education and one - fourth
were in general government (public administration). An additional 277,000
workers are under 85 major agreements that are slated to expire between
July and December, and 77,000 more are covered by contracts that have wage
reopening provisions. Nearly nine - tenths of the workers under expiring or
reopening agreements or&I In local government, most in education and
general government.
Nearly 390,000 workers are scheduled to receive deferred wage increases
averaging 4.9 percent during the last half of 1985. These changes will
made under provisions of existing bargaining agreements negotiated earls
About 20,000 workers are scheduled for COLA reviews during the last 6
months of 1985.
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS
If
Percent Change From 12 Months Ago
U.S. ALL ITEMS CITY AVERAGE
YEAR
CPI -U
l_.
,-
JAN.
FEB.
MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUG.
SEPT.
OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
ANN.AVERAGE
1946
2.3
2.1
2.8
3.2
3.0
3.1
9.0
11.4
13.1
15.3
17.7
18.2
8.4
1947
18.2
18.4
20.1
19.5
18.4
18.1
12.5
11.2
12.6
10.4
8.5
9.0
14.6
1948
10.2
9.5
6.8
8.4
9.5
9.4
9.8
9.1
,6.5
6.1
4.8
2.7
7.8
1949
1.4
1.1
1.7
0.4
-0.4
-1.0
-2.9
-3.0
-2.6
-2.7
-1.9
-1.8
-1.0
1950
-2.1
-1.3'
-1.1
-1.1
-0.6
-0.1
1.5
2.1
2.4
3.5
3.8
5.8
1.0
1951
7.9
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.4
8.7
7.8
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.9
5.9
7.9
1952
4.2
2.3
1.9
2.2
1.9
2.3
3.0
3.1
2.3
1.9
1.4
0.9
2.2
1953
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.5
0.6
0.9
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.8
1954
1.1
1.5
1.1
0.8
0.9
0.6
0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.9
-0.4
-0.5
0.5
1955
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.2
-0.6
-0.7
-0.4
-0.5
0.1
0.4
0.4
0.4
-0.4
1956
0.2
-0.2
0.4
0.5
1.0
1.6
2.0
2.1
1.9
2.5
2.4
2.9
1.5
1957
3.1
3.5
3.6
3.9
3.6
3.6
3.3
3.5
3.5
2.9
3.3
3.0
3.6
1958
3.5
3.2
3.7
3.6
3.3
2.8
2.5
2.2
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.8
2.7
1959
1.3
1.0
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.7
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.5
0.8 -
1960
1.3
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.6
1961
1.6
1.5
1.5
0.9
0.9
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.2
0.8
0.7
0.7
1.0
1962
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.1
1963
1.3
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.2_
1.3
1.6
1.2
1964
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.3
-
1965
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.9
1.7
1966
1.9
2.6
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.7
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.6
3.4
2.9
1967
3.4
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.7
2.7
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.5
2.8
3.0
2.9
1968
3.4
3.6
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.2
1969
4.6
4.7
5.1
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.5
5.6
5.8
5.6
5.7
6.1
5.4
1970
6.2
6.3
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.6
5.5
5.9
1971
5.2
4.8
4.6
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.0
3.6
3.5
3.4
4.3
1972
3.4
3.7
3.5
3.4
3.2
2.9
3.0
2.9
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.3
1973
3.7
3.9
4.7
5.1
5.5
5.9
5.7
7.5
_ 7.4
7.9
8.4
8.8
6.2
1974
9.4
10.0
10.2
10.1
10.6
11.0
11.5
11.0
12.0
12.0
12.1
12.2
11.0
1975
11.7
11.1
10.3
10.2
9.5
9.3
9.7
8.6
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.0
9.1
1976
6.8
6.3
6.1
6.1
6.2
5.9
5.4
5.6
5.5
5.3
5.0
4.8
5.8
1977
5.2
6.0
6.4
6.8
6.7
6.9
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.7
6.8
6.5
1978
6.8
6.4
6.5
6.6
7.0
7.4
7.7
7.9
8.3
8.9
9.0
9.0
7.7
1979
9.3
9.9
10.2
10.4
10.8
10.9
11.3
11.8
12.1
12.2
12.6
13.3
11.3
1980
13.9
14.1
14.7
14.7
14.4
14.3
13.2
12.8
12.7
12.6
12.6
12.4
13.5
1981
11.7
11.3
10.6
10.0
9.8
9.6
10.7
10.9
11.0
10.2
9.6
8.9
10.4
1982
8.4
7,7
6,8
6,6
6.7
7.1
6.5
5.9
5.0
5.1
4.6
3.9
4.1
1983
3.8
3.3
3.6
3.9
3.5
2.6
2.4
2.6
2.9
2.9
3.2
3.8
3.2
1984
4.1
4,6
4.7
4.5
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.0-
4.3
1985
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.4
3.2
l_.
,-
uuutAu ur Lnutin
CONSUMER PRICE INDEX CPI -U
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S.CITT
AVERAGE
ALL ITEMS 1967 =100
ALL URBAN
--�
CONSUMERS
- - --
��----------------
1
1
------
1
---
=-=
----- - - - -
--
ANNUAL
-- 111- JAPI&I - _1113, 1 NARCHI APRLkj- _- diiL,dUlfl1j L�eLI_Il
�£?St�!'
1�QST
:1
801.1
DEC.1
AVERAGE
1950
70.5
70.3
70.6
70.7
71.0
71.4
72.1
72.7
73.2
73.6
73.9
74.9
72.1
1951
76.1
77.0
77.3
77.4
77.7
77.6
77.7
77.7
78.2
78.6
79.0
79.3
77.8
1952
79.3
78.8
78.8
79.1
79.2
79.4
80.0
80.1
80.0
80.1
80.1
60.0
79.5
1953
79.8
79.4
79.6
79.7
79.9
80.2
80.4
80.6
30.7
80.9
80.6
80.5
80.1
1954
80.7
80.6
80.5
80.3
90.6
80.7
80.7
80.6
80.4
80.2
80.3
80.1
80.5
1955
80.1
80.1
60.1
80.1
80.1
80.1
60.4
80.2
80.5
80.5
80.6
80.4
80.2
1956
80.3
80.3
80.4
80.5
30.9
81.4
82.0
81.9
82.0
82.5
82.5
82.7
81.4
1957
82.8
83.1
83.3
83.6
83.8
84.3
84.7
84.8
84.9
84.9
85.2
85.2
84.3
1958
85.7
85.8
66.4
86.6
86.6
86.7
86.6
86.7
86.7
86.7
86.8
86.7
86.6
1959
86.8
86.7
86.7
86.8
86.9
87.3
87.5
87.4
87.7
88.0
88.0
88.0
97.3
1960
8709
88.0
88.0
88.5
88.5
88.7
88.7
88.7
88.8
89.2
89.3
89.3
88.7
1961
89.3
89.3
89.3
89.3
89.3
89.4
89.8
89.7
89.9
89.9
89.9
89.9
89.6
1962
89.9
90.1
90.3
90.5
90.5
90.5
90.7
90.7
91.2
91.1
91.1
91.0
90.6
1963
91.1
91.2
91.3
91.3
91_3
91.7
92.1
92.1
92.1
92.2
92.3
92.5
91.7
1964
92.6
92.5
92.6
92.7
92.7
92.9
9J.1
93.0
93.2
93.3
93.5
93.6
92.9
1965
93.6
93.6
93.7
94.0
94.2
94.7
94.8
94.6
94.8
94.9
95.1
95.4
94.5
1966
95.4
96.0
96.3
96.7
96.8
97.1
97.4
97.9
98.1
96.5
98.5
98.6
97.2
1967
98.6
98.7
98.9
99.1
99.4
99.7
100.2
100.5
100.7
101.0
101.3
101.6
100.0
1968
102.0
102.3
102.8
103.1
103.4
104.0
104.5
104.8
105.1
105.7
106.1
106.4
104.2
1969
106.7
107.1
108.0
108.7
109.0
109.7
110.2
110.7
111.2
111.6
112.2
112.9
109.8
1970
113.3
113.9
114.5
115.2
115.7
116.3
116.7
116.9
117.5
118.1
118.5
119.1
116.3
1971
119.2
119.4
119.8
120.2
120.8
121.5
121.8
122.1
122.2
122.4
122.6
12J.1
121.3
1972
123.2
123.8
124.0
124.3
124.7
125.0
125.5
125.7
126.2
126.6
126.9
121.3
125.3
1973
127.7
128.6
129.8
130.7
131.5
132.4
132.7
135.1
135.5
136.6
137.6
138.5
133.1
1974
139.7
141.5
143.1
143.9
145.5
146.9
149.0
149.9
151.7
153.0
154.3
155.4
147.7
1975
156.1
157.2
157.8
158.6
159.3
160.6
162.3
162.8
163.6
164.6
165.6
166.3
161.2
1976
166.7
167.1
167.5
168.2
169.2
170.1
171.1
171.9
172.6
173.3
173.8
174.3
170.5
1977
175.3
177.1
178.2
179.6
180.6
181.8
181.6
18J.3
184.0
184.5
185.4
18b.1
181.5
1978
187.2
188.4
189.8
191.5
193.3
195.3
196.7
197.8
199.3
200.9
202.0
202.9
195.4
1979
204.7
207.1
209.1
211.5
214.1
216.6
218.9
221.1
223.4
225.4
227.5
229.9
217.4
1980
233.2
236.4
239.8
242.5
244.9
247.6
247.8
249.4
251.7
253.9
256.2
258.4
246.8
1981
260.5
263.2
265.1
266.8
269.0
271.3
274.4
276.5
279.3
279.9
280.7
281.5
272.4
1982
282.5
283.4
283.1
284.3
287.1
290.6
292.2
292.8
293.3
294.1
293.6
292.4
289.1
1983
293.1
293.2
293.4
295.5
297.1
298.1
299.3
300.3
301.8
302.6
303.1
303.5
298.4
1984
305.2
306.6
307.3
308.8
309.7
310.7
311.7
313.0
314.5
315.3
315.3
315.5
311.1
1
1985 316.1 317.4 318.8 320.1 321.3 322.3 322.9 323.5 324.5 325.5
11/22/85 Region V