cp02-28-2006 c
e
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2006
1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Jon Lindekugel, Christ the King Lutheran Church
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 14,2006
Action - Motion to approve as presented
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES FROM JANUARY 17,2006
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JANUARY 17,2006
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2005
BUILDING DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
HUTCHINSON HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BOARD MINUTES FROM
JANUARY 17,2006
CITY OF HUTCHINSON GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
CITY OF HUTCHINSON INVESTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 12913 - RESOLUTION TO SELL SURPLUS PROPERTY
2. RESOLUTION NO. 12916 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (SKID STEER LOADER)
3. ORDINANCE NO. 05-0424 - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE
REGARDING LOT COVERAGE IN THE Rl, R2 AND R3 DISTRICTS - SINGLE AND TWO
FAMILY WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
(c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
I. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND REZONING OF TWO LOTS FROM C4
TO R2 FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A 48-UNIT ADDITION ONTO THE CEDAR
CREST ESTATES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT 225 SHADY RIDGE ROAD WITH
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MODIFYING THE
2.
3.
e 4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
e
e
e
e
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 28, 2006
HIGHWAY 7 ACCESS WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 12914 AND WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF
ORDINANCE NO. 06-0429 FOR MARCH 14,2006)
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO V ACA TE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE LOCATED BETWEEN 1408 AND 1412 HERITAGE A VENUE NW
FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMBINING THE TWO LOTS INTO ONE LARGE LOT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE-F AMIL Y HOME WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
(WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO.
06-0430 FOR MARCH 14,2006)
3. CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW
CONSTRUCTION O~A 190-FOOT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON PROPERTY
LOCA TED AT 4 123 A VENUE NW (NEW DIMENSION PLATING) (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
12915)
(d) APPOINTMENT OF BILL ARNDT TO JOINT PLANNING BOARD FOR 2006
(e) APPOINTMENT OF RANDY BULLERT TO SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD TO JANUARY 2009
(f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING BOARD OF EQUALIZATION FOR MAY 4, 2006,
AT 4:30 P.M.
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONSUMPTION & DISPLA Y PERMIT RENEWAL FOR
LITTLE CROW BOWLING LANES
(h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MCLEOD COUNTY
VOITURE 414 ON APRIL 1,2006, AT AMERICAN LEGION
(i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE FOR AMERICAN
LEGION POST 96 ON APRIL 8, 2006, AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
G) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF PARADE PERMITS FOR AMERICAN LEGION POST 96 ON
MAY 21, 2006, AND MAY 29, 2006
(k) CONSIDERATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER NO.1 - LETTING NO. 11,
PROJECT NO. 05-13 (WATER TREATMENT PLANT BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT - VESSEL
MATERIAL REDUCTION)
(I) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH BOLTON & MENK, INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION STAKING SERVICES ON HIGHWAY 7
(m)CONSIDERA TION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH BRAUN INTERTEC FOR CONSTRUCTION
TESTING SERVICES FOR 2006 IMPROVEMENTS
Action - Motion to approve consent agenda
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M.
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH HUTCHINSON
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERMITTING BANNERS ON CITY-OWNED
STREETLIGHT POLES ALONG MAIN STREETIHWY 15 FROM FIRST AVENUE NE TO CENTURY
A VENUE AND A ONE BLOCK PORTION OF WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST (WAIVE FIRST
READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-0428 FOR
MARCH 14, 2006)
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - FEBRUARY 28, 2006
e
Action - Motion to close public hearing
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
7. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF REPORT ON WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING NEEDS
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) PRESENTATION BY MILES SEPPELT, EDA DIRECTOR, ON 2005 HUTCHINSON ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF 2007 BUDGET PARAMETER CONSIDERATIONS
- OVERALL DOLLAR AMOUNT OR PERCENT INCREASE IN LEVY DOLLARS
- NEW GROWTH DOLLARS
- LGA HOLDBACK
- TAX RATE
Action -
9. NEW BUSINESS
e
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-0431- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC
ARTS COMMISSION (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
FOR MARCH 14,2006)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH PROFESSIONAL MOSQUITO
CONTROL FOR 2006 MOSQUITO CONTROL SERVICES
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
12. ADJOURN
e
3
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14,2006
..
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Steve Cook called the meeting to order. Members present were Bill Arndt, Kay Peterson, Jim Haugen
and Casey Stotts. Others present were Ken Merrill, Finance Director, John Rodeberg, Public Works Director
and Marc Sebora, City Attorney.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Jon Lindekugel, Christ the King Lutheran Church, delivered the invocation.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. MINUTES
(a) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 24, 2006
(b) BID OPENING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 2,2006 (WATER TREATMENT PLANT REPLACMENT -
BUILDING 10)
(c) SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2006
(d) HWY 7 PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 7, 2006
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve the minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
e
5. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
e 1. PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 28,2005
2. MOTOR VEHICLE MONTHLY REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2005
3. FIRE DEP ARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2006
4. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2005
5. P ARKS, RECREATION, COMMUNITY EDUCATION BOARD MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 7,
2005
6. HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2005
7. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR DECEMBER 2005
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 12903 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE
MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HOME RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
2. RESOLUTION NO. 12904 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MAINTENANCE
AND OPERATION AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR MAINTENANCE OF HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
3. RESOLUTION NO. 12905 - RESOLUTION CANVASSING ELECTION RETURNS OF SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON JANUARY 31, 2006
4. RESOLUTION NO. 12909 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (SEWER TELEVISING, UNLEADED
GAS, MANURE, BAG FILM, CONTROL PANEL)
5. RESOLUTION NO. 12910 - RESOLUTION RELEASING PLEDGED SECURITIES FROM FIRST
MINNESOTA BANK
t.\ La-)
e
e
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 14, 2006
(k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS FOR LIQUOR STORE PROJECT
Items 5(b)6, 5(b)8, 5(c) and 5(i) were pulled for separate action. Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to
approve the consent agenda With the exception of the items listed. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 5(b)6 had further discussion. Ken Merrill, Finance Director, clarified that this resolution should read to
accept pfedged securities and not release them. Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve Resolution
No. 12911 with the noted revision. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 5(b)8 had further discussion. Mayor Cook noted that this item was deferred at the last meeting so this
should really be the first reading with the second readin~ and adoption be set for February 28, 2006.
Additional language has been added to the ordinance claritying the purpose of the ordinance. Motion by
Stotts, second by Arndt, to waive first reading and set second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 05-
0424 for February 28, 2006. Mayor Cook noted he was comfortable with the 50% lot coverage and
appreciates the additionallanguage clarifying the purpose of the ordinance.
Item 5(c) had further discussion. Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to consider this item with Miles
Seppelt's presentation later on the agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
Item 5(i) had further discussion. John Rodeberg noted that this item was budgeted for in the water
department's budget. A Request for Proposals was advertised for and a favorable bid came in for the
project. Motion by Haugen, second by Stotts, to approve consulting contract with AE2S for Century Avenue
water tower refurbishment. Motion carried unarumously.
2
L\ la-)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 14, 2006
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 6:00 P.M. - NONE
e. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) PRESENTATION BY MILES SEPPELT, EDA DIRECTOR, ON PROPOSED EMINENT DOMAIN
LEGISLATION
e
. Miles Seppelt, EDA Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Seppelt explained that eminent domain is
the government's right to take property for just compensation for economic development, public
improvements, redevelopment, etc. Recent court proceedings have verified this ability, however critics have
raised concerns that peop'le are at risk of taking for economic development. There is now a national effort to
reduce government's abllity to utilize eminent domain. This process is also moving forward in Minnesota by
a group of metro area car dealers and a Libertarian Group.
As an example, the City of Hutchinson used eminent domain proceedings for the Shopko redevelopment
project. Current law requires that the local government negotiate in good faith with the property owner for
property purchase, proVIde just compensation, acquire an appraisal for the pro~rty, provide funds for the
landowner to acquire an appraisal, and allows the landowner the abilio/ to appeal land valuation to a board of
condemnation commissioners and the District Court. These guidelines appear to protect the landowner
favorably.
Although eminent domain proceedings are rarely used in Minnesota, the Economic Development
Association of Minnesota is attempting to preserve the responsible use of eminent domain by maintaining
this procedure amongst local governments, albeit with some additional restrictions. Therefore, a resolution
is presented to the Council to support the preservation of eminent domain powers.
Marc Sebora stated that the League of Minnesota Cities has proposed some language preserving eminent
domain, including additional funds available to the landowner for appraisal costs and relocation costs.
Motion by Stotts, second by Arndt, to approve Resolution No. 12912, supporting efforts to preserve use of
eminent domain powers. Motion carried unanimously.
Motion by Peterson, second by Cook, to table Item 5(c). Motion carried unanimously.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ESTABLISHING TASK FORCES TO REVIEW CITY
OPERATIONS AND POLICIES (SNOW REMOVAL TASK FORCE, REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
TASK FORCE, STREET LIGHTING TASK FORCE AND ASSESSMENT POLICY TASK FORCE)
John Rodeberg presented before the Council. He stated that this is a question of process on establishing the
task forces. Historically, task forces have not been established by resolution, as they are short-term
information gathering meetings. Members are usually recruited through City Council meetings and
publication through other commission meetings. These task forces will more than likely be meetings
amongst various departments and a Council representative. Reports will be given to the Council after the
task forces have met and decided on directions to proceed.
No action is required.
(b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH SCOTT EQUIPMENT TO
OPERATE BIOSOLIDS DRYER
e
Randy DeVries, Wastewater Director, presented before the Council. Mr. De Vries stated that the purpose of
the blOsolids dryer is to operate in the winter/spring of the year for 22 days, 10 hour days, as opposed to
applying the material on local farmers' land. Scott Equipment is the manufacturer of the dryer and is the
most knowledj?;eable ofthe system. The end product from the dryer is currently sold to golf courses. Other
options are bemg researched for future operations, however work does need to be completed now.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve contract extension with Scott Equipment to operate
biosolids dryer. Motion carried unanimously.
3
L\La)
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 14, 2006
9. NEW BUSINESS
e (a) REVIEW OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY SERVICES PLAN BY WOLD ARCHITECTS
John Rodeberg, Public Works Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg explained that the
wastewater treatment facility administrative building has been on the capital plan for 3-4 years. A
representative from Wold Architects will present on the plan proposed for the building.
John McNamara, Wold Architects, presented before the Council. Mr. McNamara explained that Wold
Architects worked with engineering and staff at the facility regarding the workspace, both the physical
infrastructure and current and future space needs. Mr. McNamara explained that based upon their
assessment the existing building requires some maintenance, the lab space needs to be remodeled and
upgraded, expansion is needed for current accessibility deficiencies, and storage and training space is
needed. An expansion of approximately 2500 gross square feet is proposed, with a total project cost
estimated at $1.2 million.
John Rodeberg noted that although the project cost is over budget, costs were reduced as much as possible.
Mr. Rodeberg also noted that although a ~ood portion of the lab work is completed off-site now, the future
may require that more be done on-site agaID and staff feels its best to build for that now as opposed to adding
on later. .
Mayor Cook noted that he would like more time to consider this item and speak with John Rodeberg in more
detail. Mr. Rodeberg stated that this item was more for informational purposes and a specific contract would
be presented at a future Council meeting.
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to table this item to the February 28, 2006, City Council meeting.
Motion carried unanimously.
e
(b) REVIEW BY WOLD ARCHITECTS OF CANOPY DESIGN AT EVENT CENTER AND
CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
Dolf Moon, ParkslRecreation/Cornmunity Education Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Moon
explained that the master plan of the Event Center included a canopy outside the main entrance. However,
funds were not adequate to cover this piece at the initial time of construction.
John McNamara, Wold Architects, presented before the Council. Mr. McNamara explained that the canol?Y
is to extend over the pavement that was added this past year in front of the main entrance. The plan WIll
include an overhead and columns in the same color scheme and material of the building, which will also
include lighting. The total project cost is estimated at $175,000, with a completion date of mid-summer.
DolfMoon explained that approximately $105,000 has been raised with a room sponsorship fundraiser.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to approve canopy design and order advertisement for bids. Motion
carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION
INCREASE
Gary Forcier, Relief Association President, presented before the Council. The Relief Association is
requesting that the pension increase from $11.00/month per year of service to $ 13.00/month per year of
service. No increase has been made to the pension rate for six years.
Motion by Arndt, second by Haugen, with Stotts abstaining, to approve Fire Department Relief Association
pension increase to $13.00/month per year of service. Motion carried unanimously.
e
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ISSUES RELATED TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS
- CHANGE ORDER FOR RO FILTER STORAGE .
- CONSULTING AGREEMENT FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS
- AWARDING CONTRACT FOR WATER TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS
4
4Laj
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 14, 2006
e
e
e
John Rodeberg, Public Works Director, explained that several items need action on as noted above.
Scott Young, Earth Tech, presented before the Council. Mr. Young explained that the change order listed is
for storage costs for the RO filter due to no current on-site storage location. This change order allows for up
to $9000 in storage costs. The manufacturer will be storing the equipment until the water plant can house it.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve the change order for the RO filter storage. Motion
carried unanimously.
Scott Young, Earth Tech, stated that this agreement covers Phase 2 construction services, supplemental
design services and biddin~ services for a total agreement cost of $1.275 million. This is approximately
13% higher than estimated ill October 2004. These additional costs can be worked into the current loan that
has been awarded by the State, which has a 2.75% interest rate. Scott Young also explained that this
contract calls for 1.5 Earth Tech employees working on the project. The facility is scheduled to be in
operation February 2007. .
Motion by Stotts, second by Peterson, to approve phase 2 consulting agreement for water treatment plant
improvements. Motion carried unanimously.
Scott Young, Earth Tech, presented before the Council. . Earth Tech is recommending the contract be
awarded to the low bidder, Gridor Construction (including alternate numbers 1 & 2), for a total contract
amount of$1 0,420,000.00. Mr. Young explained the benefits of awarding the alternates along with the base
bid.
It was noted that this construction project and the Hwy 7 project will be coordinated together as much as
possible.
Marc Sebora, City Attorney, explained that the Council could award the base bid to Gridor Construction and
consider awarding the alternates to Gridor Construction in the future. No negotiations can be made on the
alternate bids.
Motion by Peterson, second by Stotts, to award contract to Gridor Construction, including alternate numbers
1 & 2. Motion carried unanimously.
(e) REVIEW OF CROW RIVER DAM PROJECT STATUS
John Rodeberg, Public Works Director, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg reviewed the Crow
River Dam reconstruction project. This project needs to coordinate with the Hwy 7 bridge reconstruction
work. The DNR has been urging the City to make ecological improvements to the dam. Some structural
deficiencies and operational deficiencies have been noted, as well as aesthetic and ecosystem issues. Plans
include replacin~ the dam with "The Rapids", adding recreational areas, relocating "Little Crow", enhancing
access to the traIl and the south walkway and stabilizing the channel area between Main Street and Bluff
Street.
The estimated project costs total $1.6 million. Funding would come from the City and the DNR, with the
majority of the project being paid by federal funds. Barring receiving the federal funding, the project is
scheduled to begin late Fal12006/Surnmer 2007.
(f) CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF 2007 BUDGET PARAMETER CONSIDERATIONS
- OVERALL DOLLAR AMOUNT OR PERCENT INCREASE IN LEVY DOLLARS
- NEW GROWTH DOLLARS
- LGA HOLDBACK
- TAX RATE
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to table this item to February 28, 2006. Motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SETTING JOINT MEETING WITH HUTCHINSON
HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 21, 2006, AT 8:30 A.M. AT THE CITY
CENTER
5
y~
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES-FEBRUARY 14,2006
e
Motion by Haugen, second by Arndt, to set joint meeting with HRA Board for March 21, 2006, at 8 :30 a.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
(h) CLOSED SESSION UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTE 13D.05, SUBD. 3(C) TO CONSIDER
PROPERTY ACQUISITION (SKYDIVE HUTCHINSON PROPERTY FOR AIRPORT & OTHER USES)
Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to convene into closed session at 7:45 p.m. Motion carried
unanimously.
The regular meeting reopened at 8:00 p.m.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
e
Marc Sebora - Mr. Sebora inquired as to whether the Council would be interested in retaining the services of
an attorney specializing in hospital mergers and consolidations to consider for the hospital privatization
issue. Mr. Sebora stated that, should the proposed hospital privatization materialize, he felt that by
consulting with an independent party, all entIties involved would be the best represented.
Motion by Arndt, second by Peterson, to authorize Marc Sebora to obtain a proposal from an attorney
speci~lizing in hospital mergers and consolidations for the Council to review and consider. Motion carried
unarumously.
Jim Haugen - Council Member Haugen gave favorable comments on the new camera system installed in the
Council Chambers.
John Rodeberg - Mr. Rodeberg informed the Council that a Hwy 15 Coalition meeting is being held on
February 24, 2006, at 10:00 am.
Motion by Arndt, second by Cook, to set the Hwy 15 Coalition meeting as a public meeting so all Council
Members can attend if desired. Motion carried unanimously.
Steve Cook - Mayor Cook mentioned that he received a request that a mailbox be added by the drop boxes
in the City Center parking lot. This would be an added convenience and reduce some of the congestion at
the post office.
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
Motion by Peterson, second by Arndt, to approve claims, appropriations and contract payments. Motion carried
unanimously.
12. ADJOURN
With no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Peterson, seconded by Arndt, to adjourn at 8: 15 p.m.
Motion carried unanimously.
e
6
L\ L<0
e
e
e
"
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNUAL MEETING - January 17, 2006
Hospital- Conference Room A/B
Members present were: Wayne Fortun, Chairperson; Mike Mueller, Vice Chairperson
Sherry Ristau, Secretary; Steve Snapp Trustee; Bernie Knutson, Trustee; Kay Peterson,
Trustee; and Dr. AI Lira, Chief of Staff.
Others present were: Philip Graves, President; Robyn Erickson, Care & Programs
Division Director, Cary Linder, Foundation Director; Elaine Schermann, Quality
Resource Representative; Linda Krentz, Administrator of Burns Manor Nursing Home;
Brian Weinreis, Vice President, Finance, Hospitals & Specialty Operations, Allina
Hospitals and Clinics; Doug Hanneman, Hutchinson Leader; and Corrinne Schlueter,
Recorder.
Chairperson Fortun called the meeting to order at 5:39 PM.
Dr. Daniel Beggs, Radiologist was introduced to provide a program on the new CT
Imaging Unit. Dr. Beggs supplied information on his back ground as well as information
on Consulting Radiology. He then gave Board Members a tour of the "new" CT Scanner
along with a review of images recently taken of patients.
Consent Aeenda
Chairperson Fortun reviewed the following consent agenda items as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
. Following discussion, Ristau made a motion, seconded by Knutson, to approve
the consent agenda as presented. AIl were in favor. Motion carried.
1. Old Business.
A. Past Meeting Minutes. (December 20, 2005) Fortun reported the motion
and second for each motion on the Committee charge and membership
was completed; however a consensus of the board was not formally taken
to approve the action. The December minutes need to be amended to
reflect "all were in favor" and the "motion was carried" for each action.
. Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by
Peterson, to amend the motion for each Committee charge and
membership to reflect "all were in favor and motion was carried"
and also approve the minutes of the December meeting, as
amended. All were in favor. Motion carried.
:>la)\ \
r
Board of Directors' Annual Meeting
Page Two
January 17, 2006
e
II.
New Business.
A. Medical Executive Committee Minutes and Credentialing. Graves
provided a report on the recent Medical Executive Committee Meeting.
The following practitioners were recommended for membership to the
Medical Staff.
Initial
Lawrence Mottl, MD
Family Practice
Active
Resignations.
Kerry Kallas, MD
Steven Jensen, MD
Thomas Meyer, CRNA
Greg Mellesmoen, CRNA
Radiology
Radiology
Anesthesia
Anesthesia
. Following discussion, Peterson made a motion, seconded by
Mueller, to grant membership and privilege and to accept
resignations of the above listed practitioners as recommended by
the Medical Executive Committee. All were in favor. Motion
carried.
e
B.
Nominating Committee Reoort. Steve Snapp reported on the
Nominating/Governance Committee Meeting during which the required
officers of the board were discussed. It was the recommendation of the
nominating committee that the current officers serve an additional one
year term. The officers are:
Wayne Fortun, Chairperson
Mike Mueller, Vice Chairperson
Sherry Ristau, Secretary
Various Board Committees. Also reported was a grid which outlined
the various committees and members of each committee for 2006.
the various board committees that were selected.
e
Presidential Search Committee Members. Snapp reviewed the plan
which is used by Allina for the search for a replacement of the President.
The plan has been used in several Allina Hospitals and has been very
successful. Snapp discussed the process which was used in making the
recommendation of the committee membership. The members are as
follows: Wayne Fortun, Mike Mueller, and Sherry Ristau; Dr's Remple,
McGinnis, Murphy, and Nichols; Rickie Ressler, Allina; Becky Streich,
Robyn Erickson, Human Resourses; Pam Larson, Senior Leadership;
Kathy Lipke, RN Charge Nurse Acute Care; Heidi Nelson, RN Inpatient
Mental Health Manager; and Pam Wolling, RN Senior Care Nurse
Manager.
sL ~ \ i.
,.
Board of Directors' Annual Meeting
Page Three
January 17, 2006
e
· Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by
Peterson, to accept the Nominating Committee report and approve
the Officers, Committee Members, and President Search
Committee members as listed above. AIl were in favor. Motion
carried.
C. Pay Equity Implementation Report. Graves reported on a handout
prepared by Human Resources regarding a summary of Pay Equity
practices at HAHC. It was noted there were no issues with pay equity.
D.
e
e
· Following discussion, Knutson made a motion, seconded by
Mueller to approve the report as presented. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
Audit and Compliance Committee. Snapp provided the committee
report and explained he had met with Knutson, Mueller, Graves and
Larson and reviewed the financials which showed a net income $2.8
million vs. budget of$3.3 million. Net income for December was
$1.1 million of which approximately $700,000 related to
year-end adjustments. Individual income statement for Burns Manor was
discussed, along with a brief review of efforts that are being moved
forward to positively impact the bottom line. The Committee reviewed
the balance sheet and income statement for ConnectCare and HOC.
Request was made to continue to bring the statements to the Committee
meetings for review and further discussion.
They also discussed an application for Grant funds to purchase a Picture
Archiving and Communication System (PACS) through SISU. Following
the committee meeting, HAHC was notified by SISU that HAHC does not
qualify for the grant as we do not meet the bed criteria for the grant
application. The grant requires that facilities have 50 or less licensed
beds. HAHC will be able to participate in the group purchase through
SISU,but will not be able to receive any grant monies to apply to the
purchase. Additionally, capital purchases for Time Trak and Network
Equipment were reviewed, considered and are being recommended for
purchase.
. Following discussion, Snapp made a motion, seconded by
Peterson, to approve the Audit and Compliance minutes as
presented. All were in favor. Motion carried.
1)
TimeTrak Timekeeper Software & Clocks The Board reviewed the
Capital Expenditure request for the purchase of a. Time Trak Timekeeper
System. The current timekeeper software (Kronos) and time clocks, due
to their age, no longer have engineering support and need to be replaced.
!it9 \ i
,
e
e
e
Board of Directors' Annual Meeting
Page Four
January 17, 2006
HAHC would upgrade the current Kronos software and clocks for $50,000
or purchase TimeTrak software and clocks for $86,615.
The $50,000 upgrade would provide minimal enhancements to the current
system and would not yield efficiencies in order to improve productivity.
The Time Trak software, which will be supported by SISU, includes new
scheduling features, more flexibility with programming payroll rules and
capabilities for editing timecards based on exception and would create a
payback of 1.23 years.
. Following discussion, motion was made by Snapp, seconded by
Peterson, to request approval from the City Council to approve the
purchase of a TimeTrak Timekeeper Software & Clocks at a cost
of $86,615. All were in favor. Motion carried.
2)
Cisco Network Equipment The Board reviewed the Capital Expenditure
request for the purchase of Cisco Network Equipment. This will improve
network performance at the core of the network and upgrade top layer
distribution switches, at a cost of $146,518. This item has been carried in
the capital expenditure budget for the past two years. This more easily
facilitates internet working HAHC and SISU networks. Most equipment
older than five years old in the existing network will be replaced.
Upgrading the system will position HAHC for future technology (wireless,
P ACS) and result in a system that can be maintained/expanded more
easily and thus less costly. This item will be purchased through SISU
through a group purchasing arrangement.
. Following discussion, motion was made by Snapp, seconded by
Knutson to request approval from the City Council to approve the
purchase of the Cisco Network Equipment at a cost of$I46,518.
AIl were in favor. Motion carried.
E. Vacuum Pumo Reolacement. Graves reported on some needed mechanical
upgrades to the central vacuum system for the hospital. He stated this was also a
fmding in the last report from the Joint Commission. The proposed purchase
price is $70,000; approximately $45,000 for equipment and $25,000 for
labor/installation.
The hospital will purchase the equipment utilizing the tax exempt status and a
contract will be issued to the contractor with the lowest quote for the installation
of the system.
. Following discussion, motion was made by Ristau, seconded by Knutson, to
authorize the replacement of the central Vacuum Pump at a cost not to
exceed $70,000 and to hire a responsible contractor after seeking quotations
for labor and installation of the system. All were in favor. Motion carried.
SLa9 \ t:
,
e
Board of Directors' Annual Meeting
Page Five
January 17, 2006
F. 3rd Amendment to Lease. Graves reported we have over the past several years
provided a rent credit to the Hutchinson Medical Center for space, which we
occupy inside HMC. This last year we placed the Orthopedic and Fracture
Clinic in the west side of the clinic which was occupied previously by HMC and
other hospital services. A resolution entitled "3rd Amendment to Lease" was
presented for consideration.
· Following discussion, motion was made by Peterson, seconded by
Mueller to approve the 3rd Amendment to Lease with the Hutchinson
Medical Center. P.A. All were in favor. Motion carried.
G. Special Board Meeting. Fortun announced we need to have a special
board meeting in early February to consider recommendations regarding our
Senior Care initiative. It has been scheduled.
. Following discussion, motion was made by Peterson, seconded by
Mueller, to set the special meeting date and time for: February 16,2006,
at 5:00 pm. AIl were in favor. Motion carried.
e
. Following discussion, motion was made by Mueller, seconded by Ristau,
that we change the February 21,2006, meeting from 5:30 pm to 5:00 pm.
AIl were in favor. Motion carried.
Fortun added at the February meeting, we will be talking about the AIlina
relationship. We have done this before on an annual basis, but in 2005 made the
contract for 18 months.
IV. Reports.
President. Graves stated many of senior leadership were attending a conference an as
a result some reports won't be made. Additionally he briefly reported on the purpose of
the special meeting which will deal with the moratorium exception process for Senior
Care. Also, the search continues for managers for Information Services as well as
Material Services.
Senior Care. Krentz explained the results of the Quality Scoreboard that Governor
Pawlenty will be launching for Senior Care. Census is stable and they are waiting
for the Department of Health.
e
Foundation. Linder reported we are moving ahead with a ten million dollar
capital campaign. First we will proceed with a feasibility study to see what the
capacity will be in the community. To help us get part of this assessment, each
board member was requested to give ten names. The nursing home is aging and is
in need of being addressed. Tomorrow the Foundation Board will have a
strategic planning session.
5&3\ ~
,
e
e
e
Board of Directors' Annual Meeting
Page Six
January 17, 2006
Patient Safety. Schermann reported the committee approved the format for
the PDSA Cycles. Also approved was a process where we can track our
performance with near misses. We are waiting for JCAHO to come to the Lab
and Dassel. Also the JCAHO sent us a letter notifying us all items which were
identified on the fall survey, have been addressed to their satisfaction.
AIlina. Weinreis reported every week there are 100 additional people moving
into the new AIlina Commons. There will be an "open house" in the spring. In
New UIm, the Electronic Medical Records is going well and the Physician Order
Entry System will come on board soon. Mercy, Unity, and St. Francis will be
the next hospitals scheduled for the Excellion project.
Fortun asked if additional business needed to come before the group and hearing
none.
. Motion was made by Snapp, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn the
meeting. AIl were in favor. Motion carried.
Meeting was adjourned at 7:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
t~~
Corrinne Schlueter
Recorder
Sherry Ristau
Secretary
SLc0) ~
e
e
e
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Hutchinson City Council Chambers
1.
CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dean Kirchoff at 5:30 p.m. with
the following members present: John Lofdahl, Jim Haugen, Lynn Otteson,
Mike Flaata, Farid Currimbhoy and Chairman Kirchoff. Absent: Robert
Hantge Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Planning Director, Kent Exner,
City Engineer, Marc Sebora, City Attorney and Bonnie Baumetz, Planning
Coordinator
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a) Consideration of Minutes dated December 20, 2005
Ms. Otteson moved to approve the minutes of December 20, 2005 as
submitted. Seconded by Mr. Lofdahl. The minutes were approved
unanimously.
3.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING TWO LOTS FROM IIC TO R2 TO
REMAIN RESIDENTIAL USE LOCATED AT 535 AND 545 4TH AVE. S.E.
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:33 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7415 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 5,
2006.
Ms. Wischnack commented on the request and explained the present use
of the properties. She explained the non-conforming use ordinance
regarding the continuation of the use and noted the one year time limit
was exceeded. She stated the property was maintained but not lived in.
Ms. Wischnack stated it is appropriate to rezone the property to
residential. Staff did review the request and the neighboring industrial
use. Staff recommended this rezoning would not be a negative affect on
the area.
Mr. Lofdahl made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Currimbhoy. The hearing closed at 5:40 p.m. Mr. Lofdahl made a motion
to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Haugen. The motion carried unanimously. Ms.
Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City Council consent
agenda at their meeting held January 24, 2006 in the Council Chambers
at 5:30 p.m.
5L~
Minutes
Planning Commission - January 17, 2006
Page 2
e
e
e
b) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND THE
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT IN FAIRWAY ESTATES
SECOND ADDITION TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION UP TO THE FRONT
AND REAR PROPERTY LINES LOCATED AT 1187 OAKWOOD CRT
NW
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 5:41 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7416 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 5,
2006.
Ms. Wischnack commented on the request and explained this was
originally approved as a Planned Development District. She stated the
entire development was planned as a PDD. She explained that presently
the setbacks are very specific for the development in a Planned
Development District. She explained the request by the potential property
owner to construct a house up to the front and rear property lines. The
POD setbacks are 18' front yard and 5' on the sides and rear. She
reported staff reviewed the request and discussed firewall protection
when close to the property lines. She commented on the following staff
recommendations:
1. Verify as-built elevations for drainage plans for new
home, particularly the home to the east.
2. The building permit application would require an
updated survey to further verify the home location.
3. Building code compliance for fire walls where required
should be noted by the applicant.
Ms. Wischnack read correspondence from Scott Luman, 1199 Oakwood
Crt., and Jeff Nohner, 1174 Oakwood Crt., in support of this request.
She also read correspondence from George Stanley, 1183 Oakwood Crt,
against the request.
Chairman Kirchoff questioned the fire wall requirement. He commented
most of the homes are closer than building code requirements.
Diane Mattkins, 1185 Oakwood Court, asked if she will have to put a
firewall on her home. Ms. Wischnack stated not if there is more than 3
feet from her property line.
Yvonne Johnson, 1191 Oakwood Crt, questioned how far forward is the
house to be placed and where will the driveway come out. Ms.
Wischnack stated the house would come out 18 feet. Ms. Johnson asked
how you would enter the garage if it is farther forward. Mr. Exner stated
the turning radius will remain the same as presently proposed.
Discussion followed on the proposed pull-out stalls. Ms. Johnson asked if
they do not want the pull-out stall can they come back to the planning
commission to change the present plan. Ms. Wischnack stated
everything must come back to the City to amend the present POD.
5l00~
Minutes
Planning Commission - January 17, 2006
Page 3
e
Lee Thuntrom, potential property owner, would like a 3 car garage to
keep his vehicles off the street and not outside. He stated he will try to
conform to the present properties.
Kerry Kuester, President of the association, reported parking has been a
problem in this area. He stated the board has been discussing changes
to provide more parking.
Ms. Otteson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.Lofdahl
the hearing closed at 6:05 p.m. Mr. Lofdahl asked which house is the one
opposing the request. He does not see a negative impact. Mr. Lofdahl
made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff
recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Flaata. The motion carried
unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated this item will be placed on the City
Council consent agenda at their meeting held January 24, 2006 in the
Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m.
c) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE
REGARDING LOT COVERAGE IN THE R1, R2 AND R3 DISTRICT
SINGLE AND lWO FAMILY
Chairman Kirchoff opened the hearing at 6:08 p.m. with the reading of
publication # 7417 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on January 5,
2006.
e
Ms. Wischnack commented on the options laid out by staff. She reported
this process began one year ago and they reviewed options in November
and December. She stated one of the issues was the older single family
properties. She commented on the five properties which were calculated
in the older area of the city. She also commented on the three options.
She stated option one is the staff recommendation. Option 2 definition
did not change from present. Option three would be a 50% coverage.
Lot coverage is in the 45% to 55% coverage which makes the staff
nervous.
Mark Schnobrich, City Forester, commented on tree coverage as a
positive. Soils are not as impervious as they seem.
Discussion follow on the options and how they affect the twin home
development and the single family homes. Development plans can be set
on a localized basis which raises the cost of the development.
Ms. Otteson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Flaata, the hearing closed at 6:35 p.m. Mr. Flaata made a motion to
recommend approval of Option 3 with the survey requirement of Option 1.
Seconded by Ms. Otteson. The motion carried unanimously. Ms.
Wischnack stated this should take affect March 1 st. Ms. Wischnack stated
this item will be placed on the City Council consent agenda at their
meeting held, January 24, 2006 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m.
e
4.
NEW BUSINESS
5~~
Minutes
Planning Commission - January 17, 2006
Page 4
e
5. OLD BUSINESS
a) CONFIRM APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT KNOWN AS LAKERIDGE
Ms. Wischnack explained the plat was not recorded within 270 days of
final plat approval and now is ready to be sold. It must be filed before
purchase of the units. She explained a Common Interest Community,
(CIC) plat will be also filed.
Mr. Haugen made a motion to approve the reconfirmation. Seconded by
Mr. Currimbhoy, the motion carried unanimously. Ms. Wischnack stated
this item will be placed on the City Council consent agenda at their
meeting held, January 24, 2006 in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m.
6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
a) DISCUSSION OF DATE FOR JOINT MEETING AND TOUR WITH CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS
The joint meeting and tour will be held on March 28th at 3:30 p.m.
Next month possibilities:
e
b) Mr. Exner updated the Commissioners on the water plant Landscaping
plan. He stated without the retaining walls slope stabilization would be
required. He commented on the maintenance of the shrubbery. He explained
there is a 3:1 slope which is quite steep. He stated retaining walls are safer.
The consensus of the Planning Commission was to keep the retaining walls
and add Shrubbery around the tank to make it harder to place. graffiti on the
tank.
c) Next month possibilities - Conditional use permit and Variance for cell
tower, Cedar Crest Estates Rezoning and CUP
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
e
5( e>.-Y-
e
e
e
PIONEERLAND UBRARY SYSTEM BOARD
November 17, 2005, Meeting Minutes
The November 17, 2005, meeting of the Pioneerland Library System board was called to order by Chair Garrison Hale at 7:30
p.m. in the WDlmar Public Library meeting room. RoU call was taken; a quorum was announced. Jeff Lopez asked that the
following changes be made to the agenda: V A5 -Interest & Investment strategy update (added); V A6 - BnI for Willmar
Expendable Trust Fund update (added); VAl - Letter of support for Atwater's Building Grant V.S.1 - New employees
(deleted); and V.D. - PLS, Plum Creek & SAMMIE to include Statement of Cooperation: PLSlPlum Creek/SAMMIE {modified).
Barb Nelson moved to approve the agenda as modified; second by Bridget Wynn-Kienenberger; carried. Hennan
Hannemann moved to approve the October 20, 2005, minutes; second by Stacey Schuette; carried.
Jeff Lopez presented for the Finance Commillee:
1) October 2005 financial reports show expected amounts, reoommended approval. Ron Antony moved to approve the
October 2005 Financial report; second by Eric Welberg; carried.
2) October 2005 bills/check registers reflect routine expenditures; recommended approval. Eric Welberg moved to approve
the October 2005 bills and check reglstBr; HCOnd by Todd Patzer; carried.
3) Jeff Lopez reported that the WDlmar, Sid Island, Hector, and Kerkhoven libraries were awarded a $2,000 Every Child
Ready to Read grant
4) Jeff Lopez presented the contract for the Willmar Library's 8-week Spanish Course for approval. Pat Brown moved to
approve signing contract; lec:oad by hny Wilde. Soard discussion included appropriateness of use of funds, purpose
of Mardag grant funds to develop and test model for reaching underserved populations in rural libraries, reasoning behind
location of course, positive impact of bilingualism on chidren's SA TIACT scores, level and focus of training. Mollon
carried.
5) Jeff Lopez reported that pursuant to October's board motion to compare investment returns, Bremer did offer the best rates
for interest income based on the approved investment strategies.
6) Eric Weiberg reported that board members had not yet had an opportunity to meet with city of Will mar officials to discuss
the Wilmar Public Ubrary's ceDing leaks due to a design and/or construction flaw, but that these members would continue
to pursue this meeting.
7) J6fr Lopez requested board approval to sign a letter of support for the City of Atwater's building grant Joan Reckdahl
moved to approve Ilgning IeItl8r of aupport; second by Ron Antony. After discussion regarding whether PLS would
be obligated for funds in this relocation (no~ motion canlecl.
Paul Setzepfandt presented for the Personnel Committee, recommending approval of the following six policies which had their
first reading at the September 15,2005, meeting:
1) 203 - Criteria for SalarylBenefit Increases: Non-Repreeented Employees
2) 213 - Head Librarian HOUIS
3) 1106 - Compensation for Unused Leave Upon Separalion
4) 2301 - Sexual HarasSment
5) 2302 - Prevenoon of Workplace VIoIenoe
6) 2302 - Harassment
Paul Setzepfandt moved to IflProve"sIx policies; IlIc:OI1CI by Hennan Hannemann; motion carried.
Stacey Schuette presented for the Ad hoc Committee on GoaIslEvaluationIRestructuring. The meeting scheduled for
November 181' was canoeIed due to waalher and has been rescheduled for Tuesday, November 29th at 5:30 p.m.
Chair Hale reported on the ongoing cf~~ between PlS, PeLS, and SAMMIE. During the most recent meeting,
discussed were areas of possible ooBaboraOOn andlor sharilg resources, such as grant writing, delivery service, and providing
seNices to school distOOtslllbraries. Chai' Hale discussed the difficulties facing public school and post-secondary li>raries. Amy
Wilde noted that special educatim is a big area lOr sharing resources for schools without any fear of merginglconsolidating.
Chair Hale ooted that counties 81d c;IIesfrequenlly do this in the areas of administrators and engineeringlpublic works staff.
The next meeting will be held January 11" at the Marshal Community Center from 4-5:30 p.m.. Director Houlahan stated he
hoped to talk ci>out sharing costs for PLS staff &ne wIh PL.S and SAMMIE in the area of grant writing to pursue an LST A grant
to develop a pIanlpBrtnershlp with PeLS and SAMMIE. 81rbara Hoyhtp moved to approve signing .tatement of
cooperation; second by Jack Sandburg; motion carried..
5L~
e
Amy Wilde and Director Houlahan discussed aurent LMC meeting results as well as the need to find a replacement for WDde,
whose term expires Janual}' 3, 2006. The replacement boaId member will be seated after the date of the next LMC meeting on
January 11th. Amy Wilde asked the board if she should stiH represent PLS at the January LMC meeting. Chair Hale suggested
promoting one of the designated alternates (Anne Wilkening or John Baker) to serve for Amy Wilde. In addition to Anne
Wilkening and John Baker, other current members of the LMC committee are Dan Reigstad, Paul Selzilpfandt, and Jeffrey
Lopez.
Chair Hale then asked if any board member who has experlenoe with negotiation would volunteer to serve as an alternate on
the Negotiation Committee. Richard Falk volunleer8d. Chair Hale volunteered to serve as the second alternate. Eric Weiherg
moved to accept Falk as al18ma18; second by Ron Antony. Joan Reckdahl moved to Iccept Chair Hale IS second
al18rnlte. Eric Welberg Ind Ron Antony agreed to amend theIr motion; Joan Reckdahl concurred; motion carried.
With no new business. Director Houlahan presented his Director's Report He discussed the upoorning meeting to be held on
March 22,2006, at the Holiday InnlConventim Centeril WiDmar. This forum is being put on jointly by the MN Ubrary Trustee
Association and the Minnesota Friends of Libraries AssocIation (MALF). . The meeting will focus on the concerns of board
trustees and friends' groups in rural areas. Until Januay 1, MALF is requesting subjects for discussion and desired agenda
Items. Chair Hale suggested issueS relating to MN S1al134 - Governance and Models of Library Systems (e.g., consolidated,
federal, etc.). Director Houlahan asked board membenl to contact him If they have suggestions. The meeting will probably be
held about 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on March 22, 2006.
Chair Hale asked Director HouIahan to update membenl on the December 15 City and County Administrators Library Summil
Director Houlahan asked Holly Johnson to explain the list of names provided to board members at the beginning of the meeting.
She provided each board memberwilh the name(s) of indiYiiuals invited to the summit who had not yet RSVPed. She asked
board members to contact the indivkluals to encourage them to RSVP for themselves or their designee, concerning their intent
to attend the summll
Director Houlahan requested Nominating Commlltse members to meet after the meeting to set the date for their meeting.
e Amy Wide disaJssed how the lateness il releasing the most aJrrent M.O.E. informatbn affected several cities/counties within
PLS. She reported that the MN state auditor had presented information about the 'unfunded mandates' in her community and
how unfunded mandate reform might address the timilg Issues with M.O.E. The MN state auditor stated Joint Powers Boards
could adopt a resolution recommending the figures ueecI in detennining M.O.E. be from the previous year and not the current
year. This resolution would go to all PLS goveming bodies, who oouId adopt It. Further, the state aud~or reported that if it
receives 6 or more such resolutions, It wit post them on Is websIIe as a recommendation to the legislature to address. Amy
WDde reoommended all cilies and counties do this at their local level and offered to draft a model resolution using the state's
format for review at the December 151' Joint ExecutIve BoatIIFmance Commlllee r.neeting.
Joe Fagnano moved to Idjourn the rneellng; HCOnd by Francll Schwelu; mollon carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:30
p.m.
Respectfuly submilled,
Holy Johnson, Recording Secretaly
..
e
g~?:>
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COUNT OF BUIl.,DING/PLUMBING/MECHANICALPERMITS
ISSUED AND V ALUATIONFOR EACHi\lONTH OF 2006
JANUARY 2006
No. of Permits
2
2
4
1
6
1
3
1
4
6
1
1
1
1
9
9
1
53
Valuation
333,000
Sin Ie Family
Manufactured Homes
Window Re lacement - Residential
Accessory Buildin s - Residential
Reside - Residential
Reroof - Residential
Residential Addition/Re airIRemodel
Porch - Residential
Basement Finish
Commercial Addition/Remodel
Buildings Moved
Tern Ofary Permit
Miscellaneous
S rinkler
Mechanical
Plumbing
Si n
TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED AND VALUATION
18,500
15,000
51,000
500.00
16,500
5(a0Y
e
e
e
d~
Hutchinson Housing & RedevelopmentAuthority
Regular Board Meeting Tuesday, January 17,2006
Minutes
1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Casey Stotts called the meeting to order. Members Present: Becky
Felling, Thor Skeie, Joel Kraft, and Dan Carlson. Staff Present: Jean Ward, and Judy Flemming.
2. MINUTES OF THE HRA BOARD MEETING ON DECEMBER 20, 2005
Joel Kraft moved to approve the Minutes as written. Dan Carlson seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
3. FINANCIAL REPORTS
Dan Carlson moved to approve the City Center and the Park Towers Financials. Joel Kraft seconded
and the motion carried unanimously.
4. RESOLUTION #06-2
Joel Kraft moved to approve Resolution #06-2 Authorizing Mileage Reimbursement According to
IRS Set 2006 Rates. Dan Carlson seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
5. PARK TOWERS
a. Becky Felling moved to approve Resolution #06-1 for Deletion of Twelve Ranges and Twelve
Refrigerators from 2005 Depreciation Report. Thor Skeie seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
b. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the PHAS Vacant Unit Turnaround Report and Park Towers
CFP Grant Portfolio Status
6. HHPOP
Joel Kraft moved to approve HHPOP Loan #8815 contingent upon the Loan Review Committee review
and approval. Dan Carlson seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
7. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
a. Jean Ward reviewed with the Board the MHF A CRV application for construction financing for the
school construction program. Thor Skeie moved to approve the submission of the CRV application
to MHF A. Joel Kraft seconded and the motion passed unanimously.
b. Jean Ward, Joel Kraft and Becky Felling review with the rest of the Board the results of review and
analysis of the idea of purchasing more lots at Island View Heights. Thor Skeie moved to purchase
Lots 9 and 10 at Island View Heights for $32,500 each. Joel Kraft seconded and the motion passed
unanimously.
c. Becky Felling moved to approve the Repayment Agreement from HHI for a Credit Line of up to
$35,000 to purchase lots for the School Construction Program. Dan Carlson seconded and the
motion passed unanimously.
d. Jean reviewed with the Board the draft proposal ranking criteria for J"ealtor services for the School
Construction Program house. Dan Carlson moved to approve the ranking criteria for realtor
services for the School Construction Program house. Joel Kraft seconded and the motion passed
unanimously.
e. HRA Board member's are invitation to Open House Friday, January 27th from 9:30 AM- 2:30PM
at the School Construction house at 1160 Prairie View Drive SW.
8. The Board decided to schedule a meeting with the City Council March 2151 at 8:30 AM to review the
HRA 2005 Year End Report.
9. ADJOURNMENT
Becky Felling moved to adjourn. Dan Carlson seconded and the motion carried unanimously. There
being no other business, Chairman Casey Stotts declared the meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director
,1/3,.eA.-~p.t4 -
Becky Felling, secr~rrreasurer
5La0S
e
'JANU!~:I IPki=UMiNARY
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAl
;n_ 1 1
iTAXES '
[ LICENSES
[PEBMITS AND FEES
[INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE I
!CHA.RGES FOR SERVICES
[FINES & FORFEITS
;INTEREST
i REIMBURSEMENTS
, TRANSFERS
iSURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
iTOTAL -
tnnu- -
!
t
i 2006
[JANUARY
iEXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL
e
i001 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
: 002 CITY ADMINISTRATOR
i 003 ELECTIONS
i 004 FINANCE DEPARTMENT
i005_MOTOR VEHICLE
1006 ASSESSING
007 LEGAL
i 008 PLANNING
L009 INFORMATION SERVICES
i 110 POLICE DEPARTMENT
1 .. __ . ___ m___ -- -- . -----
I 115 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
U16 SAFETY COMMITTEE
[120 FIRE DEPARTMENT
[130 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
[ 150 ENGINEERING
! 152 STREETS & ALLEYS
1 160 CITY HALL BUILDING
: 201 PARKlRECREATION ADMINISTR
1202 RECREATION 1
1-203 SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER I
! 204 CIVIC ARENA :
I 205 PARK DEPARTMENT ,
! 206 RECREATION BUILDING 8. pbo~
i 207 EVENTS CENTER I
! :268~VERGREEN BUILDING i
i 250 LIBRARY ,
1301 CEMETERY ,
i 310 DEBT SERVICE '
1320 AIRPORT i
[350 UNALLOCATED GENERALEXP~ '
TOTAL
e
--- -- -. --.
1 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT . PRELIMINARY i
2005 2006 20062ll06' 2006' JANUARY;
JANUARyl JANUARY YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCEPERCENTAGEi
YTD( MoNi'libATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING 1 USEDj,
I 1
, -,
581.251
6939.941
1
94940.36 (
170.93 :
46004.74,
16,
1291
148,782.22i
_520967r
1
757.001
23,317.14,
13_,6~{f3r
70,425.14
25.001
-14,866.82 :
30,656.58 i
3,250.00 '
650.85 '
127,876.021
1
_ 581c25in
6~39 94 J_
94940.36
17093,
46004,74
16
129
148,782,22
3,771,000.00,
44,900.00
287,} 00.00
2,631,300.00
i ,eoll, 815. b6 :
68,OoO.bo:
55,000.00 I
243,422.00 :
------ -,
1,643,500.00,
3,771.000,00
44.318,75
280,160,06
2,1331,30000
1,505,874,64
68.000.00 I
54.829.07
,197,4'1726
1,643,484,00 i
(129.00)
10,196,254.781
10,345,0:37.00:
,CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
20051 2006 I 2006 2006
JANUARY! JANUARY' YEAR TO ADOPTED
______ I _... _ ___
YTD: MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET
I ,_
4,747.38
21,785.36
28,306.59
15,439.55
I
,
10.734.37 i
13.53554 I
11,166.73,
188.795.89 .
13.16
206.10
21,697.27
12,050.89
42,621.46'
53,271.51 .
8,628.73 .'
16,328.62 '
15,716.65
,
4,084.56 .
33,585.04 ,
56,187.12
8,861.61
16,591.59
,1,158.62
,3,586.37
6,949.09
4,155.07
_ ,40,384.41
..~0~589,2~
7,794.95
23,527.80
2,015.56 .
32,605.84 _
15,236.49
7,794.95
23,527.80
2,015.56
32,605.84
15,236.49
1.3,458.10
14,811.68.
13,008.17
212,219.78
2,058.49
3,530.00
22,417.08
15,:359.01
41,858.81
68,746.25
9,500.75
16,826.15
12,147.03
6,498.83
54,534.81
54,812.46
9,782.08
17,118.97
1,417.18 _
3,339.58
7,610.83
6.674.62
_42,709.8_8
731,621.18
I
58,688.00 50,893,05
315,678.00 292,150.20
17,700.00 15,684.44
482,974.00' ,450,368.16 i
214,442.00 I 199,205.51
48,000.00, ,_ 48,000.00 '
175,078.00 i 161,619.90
_ 177,855:60-' ' _ 163,()43.32
254,317.00 ...241,:3.08.83 I,
2}15,45700 , _2,503,237.22f
14,000.00 11,941.51 I
17,850.00 i 14,320.00 I
427,637.00 405,219.92 I
248,708.00 233,348.99
574,106.00 532,247.19
1,188,286.00 1,119,539.75
151,313.00 141,812.25
189,526.00 172,699.85 ,
201,99800 189,850.97 :
I
61,013.00 54,51417 i
291,115.00 236,580.19
785,374.00 I 730,561.54 1
133,551.00 ' 123,7138.92,
220,475.00 : 203,356.03_
, 14,35000: 12,932.82_
159,544.00 : 156,204.42 1
133,895.00 i 126,284.17 ;
162,541.00 1 162,'541.00 !
102,316.00 i ~5,s4i,38 '
807,250.00 i 764,540.12
1 (),~5,037.00; ..9..613,41 ~.8?
0.00%]
1.29%1
2.42%1
0.00%1
5.93%1
O.OO%!
0.31%1
_ _ _ _____I
18.90%:
0.00%.1
1.44%!
i
1
j
i
JANUARY;
ERCENTAGE!
1
USED!
13.28%1
7.45%,
11.39%,
6.75%>
7.11%:
O.OO%!
,. I
7.69%:
8.33%:
5.11%
7.820;,'
14.70%'
19.78%1
5.24%
6.18%,
7.29%,
5.79%'
6.28%;
8.88%1
6.010/0;
10.65%1
18.730/0!
6.98%'
7.320/01
7.76%1
I
9.88%i
2.09%1
5.68%!
0.000/0 i
6.52%:
5.29%1
7:0.7~(oj
5(~)tp
e
,J:~~;~~r H ~I
i REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL
! I I --
i I
!TAXES
[LICENSES
iJ'ERMITS AND FEES
jlNTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
iCHARGES FOR SERVICES
lFINE~~FORFEITS I
INTEREST I I
. REIMBURSEMENTS
:IRANSFERS !
[SLJRCHARGES - SLOG PERMITS
ITOTAL' i
20061
[JANUARY .
lEXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL
,..
:SUMMARIZED
1
General Gov!.
Public Safety
Streets & Alleys
Parks & Recreation
Miscellaneous
TOTAL
e
e
... ...1 CiTY~OF HUTCtiiNSONfiNANCIALREPORT .
2005, 2006 2006 2006:
ACTUAL JANUARY YEAR TO ADOPTED
Year to Date MONTH DATE ACtUALl BUDGET
0.00 0.00 0.00' 3,771 :000.00 I
757.00 581.25 581.25 44.900.00 :
23.317.14 , ,6.939.94 6,939.94 287,100.00
13,661.13' 0.00 0.00 2,631,300.00
70,42514' .,94,940.36 94,940.36 1,600,815.00
25.00 ' 0.00 0.00 68,()00.00
(14,866.82) 170.93 17'0.93 I ,55,000.00
30,656.58 46,004.74 46,004.74 243,422.00
3,250.00 16.001 16.00 1,64~,5.00.00
650.85 129.00 ,129.00 0.00
127,876.02148,782.221 148,782.22. 10,345,.037.00
I,
2005
JANUARY I
YTD
114.344.25
222.763.31
95,892.97
163.049.27
44.539.48
640,589.28
2006, 2006
.JANUARY1 YEAR TO
MONTH DATE ACTUAL
I
131,959.34,
255,584.36 :
. 110,605.06~
184,087.92
49,384.50
731,621.18'
131,959.34
255,584.36
110,605.06
184,087.92
49,384.50
731,621.18
20061
,
ADOPTED
BUDGET
1,896,045.00
3,423,652.00
1,762,392.00
2,190,841.00
1,072,107.00
10,345,037.00
. "'..""".~'~".':".'.'-.'..----. ....1
2006 i
BALANCE ERCENTAGEi
REMAINING! ., _u USED!
,
3,771,000.00
44,318.75
280,16006
2,631,3()().00
1,505,87464 .
68,000,00.
54,829.07 . .
197'417.261
1,643,484.00.
(129.00J
10...1.~,254~i8,..
0.00%
1.29%
2.42%:
0.00%:
5.93%.
0.00%'
0.31%
18.90%'
0.00%'
0.00%1
1.44%1
!
20061 JANUARY!
BALANCE fERCENT AGE 1
REMAINING! USEDl
1,764,085.66
3,168,067.64
1 ,651.786.94 ~
2,006,753.08 I
1,022,7'22.50 1
9,613,415.821
I
I
6.96%
7.47%
6.28%.
8.400/0'
4.61%:
7.07%1
i
,
J
I
5-- ~J (p
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
e 23-Feb-06 January 31, 2006
Date Date
Interest Of Of
Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount
US BANK Money Market 1.43% 11/3/2004 11/19/2008 375,000.00
Smith Barney FHLMC med 4.00% 7/30/2004 7/27/2012 298,500.00
step up
Smith Barney FHLB C 4.05% 1/7/2004 7/30/2009 300,000.00
Smith Barney FHLB C 4.050% 4/28/2005 4/26/2010 750,000.00
Smith Barney FHLB C 5.010% 4/26/2005 4/26/2010 270,000.00
Wachovia pool 336914 7.226% 1231 96 0201 2026 4,930.49
Expected life 6.2 years
Smith Barney FHLM -C 4.650% 11/21/2001 5/21/2007 300,375.00
Wachovia pool 336399 7.270% 1231 96 02 01 2026 4,044.26
Expected life 4.1 years
Wachovia FHLB 5.00% 5/22/2003 5/22/2013 300,000.00
Wachovia FHLB 4.00% 6/12/2003 6/12/2013 300,000.00
e Wachovia FHLB 1 .190% 6/26/2003 06/26/13 400,000.00
Wachovia FHLB 3.000% 7/16/2003 7/16/2013 200,000.00
Wachovia FHLB step 3.000% 2/9/2005 2/9/2007 625,000.00
step up
Wachovia FHMA 3.000% 8/24/2004 2/25/2008 100,000.00
step up
Smith Barney Asset ONE 4.06 12/29/2005 02/06/06 2,470,840.93
First Minnesota 2.670% 11/16/04 12/19/06 400,000.00
First Minnesota 4.650% 11/18/05 11/20/06 750,000.00
-------------
$7,848,690.68
e
5(~1
_ -e 2/21/2006
.HlJTCI-IINl3QN UTIU"T.'iMISSION
BALANCE SHEET
JANUARY 31, 2(;)06
c."., ~'\
PAGE
1
* * * * TOTAL * * * *
ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT - AT COST
--~._---- ----.---------...-----..-.--.----
LAND 6 LAND RIGHTS
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
--..---,-"--.----.- -~----_.~~---
LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
--.--'.------------- ------ ~---_._-- -~
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
.--------------------------
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
---.-------RESTRIC~FUNDS-&ACCOUNTS
FUTURE EXPANSION 6 DEVELOPMENT
MEDICAL INSURANCE
BOND & INTEREST PAYMENT 2(;)03
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS & ACCOUNTS
CURRENT & ACCRUED ASSETS
CASH IN BANK
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
---------------- - - ------- ---------------------
INV~ORIES
PREPAID INSURANCE
PREPAID GAS EXPENSE
DEFERRED ENERGY COST - MISO
CLEARING ACCOUNT
SALES TAX RECEIVABLE
-- ------.-- ,...----~--- -YOTAL CURRENT"' t:;-'ACCRUEIi- AS"SETS
DEFERRED CHARGE
--,----..-----.--
BOND DISCOUNT 2003
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE
TOTAL ASSETS
~
~
~
---2,6:5:3, 39C66 -----~--
102,794,441.91
___ 105, 44_I,.!'J33..59 __
(31,891:'1,099.04)
<31, 690, 099 .(4)
-- ------ --- - --- -- ------ --
54.363.88
:54,363.88
73,612; 096.'13
659,772.40
100,000.00
41,4,aG7.98
1, 174,580.44
2.202,276.93
4.350,987.62
... ----~.16-;403.40
123,757.59
16.483.93
(269, :567 .19)- n____
59,230.57
1, 972.64
-----. ,- -.----7,60r:-54-S.:'69 --~--
- -~S92.~869. 00
592,869.00
_______ ____ __n_ _ ____ _
82,981. 093.:56
\
\
e-~u--_
(
': (
;~ c
;: (
;":1
;'1
~ (
"
~~
~~ (
'~
- -- ._---,. -"---~~
:~1' (
:. (
,.
~j ,
; (
~,1
- (
{
., {
:: (
"I->
. (
,':'
:~, (
I,;
1;')
r,;
(
_~. e.:2,1~1/200.6__
HUTCHINSON U.TIILI:r~MISSJ;~._~ ___
BALANCE SHEET
.JANUARY 31, 2006
MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES
MUNICIPAL EQUITY _._
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS
..__~.IOTAL MUNIG.II"'~1.".~QUIT::(__ _~______~_
~---
'?
~
~
LONG TERM LIABILITIES-NET OF
CURRENT MATURITIES
2003 BONDS
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
CONSTR CONTRACTS ~ ACeTS PAY RETAIN
AC~~ EXPENSES ~ RETAINAGE
TOTl'll,..c:ONSTRUCHON & ACCTSPAY
CURRENT & ACCRUED LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
INIEREST ACCRUED
ACCTS PAYABWE TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND
ACCRUED REC PAYMENT
ACCRUED SEVERANCE
RATE STABILIZATION- ELECTRIC
RATE STABILIZATION - GAS
CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
OTHER CURRENT & AC~VED LIABILITIES
TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIAB
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIAB
_ __e.AGE
_?
.. .. .. .. TOIAL ."-i'..... ...!!..__ .
49,9:55,~5.15
274,707.16
_ _ _~0-, 230,062. ~:L__
28,780,000.00
28,780,000.00
107,671.74
_________~~~ .!07, 6"7.1...74
2,401.206.91
---------~ 193., 930..24 - -.------.-. - ~---------
85,181.25
21_4,1.~~.l5.2
95,249.78
4,647.36
25,414.37
:544,191.92
200,000.00
93,525.00
5,862.16
3,863,359.51
B2~9Gl;093.56
e
: (
': (
~:; (
:'~
(l,i (
)J<
~:' (
., (
d;;
- (
'I
.,i {
-e-~aVL~ --
HUTCHINSON UTIl...ITIr!'lMISS1~____~___'=~~__
STATEMENT OF INCOME a. EXPENSES
JANUARY 31, 2006
--e---
PREVIOUS
YEAR TO DATE
NCOHE STATEMENT
__ ~T.1!'l!>__~~__
SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY
SALES FOR RESALE
NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES
SECURITY LIGHTS
POLE RENTAL
SALES - GAS ___________
NEW ULM TRANSPORTATION
TRANSPORTATION - ELECTRIC DIVISION
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
1, 877,781. 39
270.00
13,367.11
902..00
933.25
1,515,942.95
55,232.07
.00
3,.464,428.77
OPERATING EXPENSES
PRODUCTION OPERATION __ ___ __________23:5,418.37
PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE 12,372.59
PURCHASED POWER 1,116,395.12
OTI-ER POWER SUPPLY 39,887.21
---TRANSMISSI'ciN- OPERATION --- ,. .00
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE 85.04
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPE~U()l.l_ 1~47~._~0
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE -8,361.11
PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE 1,437,555.71
GAS TRANSMISSION OPERATION _______ ___.1, 3~_~,7A>
GAS TRANRMISSION MAINTENANCE- 180.60
GAS DISTRIBUTIilN OPERATION 19.651.08
GAS DISTRI:8UTION MAINTENANCE 7,375.27
- ---CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING a. COLLECTIONS -- 20,906.92
SALES EXPENSE 2,613.12
ADMINISTRATIVE a. GENERAL EXPENSES 160,536.35
---- DEPRE:C:f~TIciN-------------- 246,033.19
TOTAL OPERATING EXF'ENSES 3,332,148.74
OPERATING INCOME
_ CURRENT
YEAR TO DATE
1,960,139.73
3.542.88
20,693.74
9G6 . 00
933.25
1 L~'7.LF2. 01. _
54.813.60
91,674.00
3.959.875.<1_4____
148,948.18
24,865.73
1,400,608.15
-.J8,913.20
.00
130.14
19,765.25
10.703.54
1,518,955.06
5,~1..84
126.33
24, 120.95
_______ __4.L795.... 73
20,698.97
1,802.25
19~,5~7.~_
253.992.00
3,648.754.93
1
BUDGETEIL.._______~DGET_ _ _______ ANNUAL
YEAR TO DATE DEVIATION BUDGET
2,257,746.55
41.650.00
15,410.50
916.3<1>
166.60
---.L.~64, 641. 74
68,028.33
91,630.00
_~:5..4~, 190.02 ____
(297,606.82) 27,103,800.00
(38.1<1>7.12) 500,000.00
5,283.24185,000.00
(10.30) 11.000.00
766.65 2,000.<1>0
762,530.3012, 78G~3,23
(13,214.73-)--- -- ---816, 666.-67
44.00 1,100,000.00
419.685.22 _ .___~2-,--4'?~L~.?~' 90
-, I
,I; (
334,799.79 _l.Sf),es.!.61 _4,01~205.1e___
35,235.90 10,370.17 423,000.00
1.307,430.40 (93,177.75) 15,695,443.00
33,070.10 14,156.90 ,:597, 00Q..QQ
------ 166:'60 ----166:-6'0- 2.000.00
499.80 369.66 6,000.00
28.946.75 9,181.50 347,500.00
13,952.75 3. 249~21------ ---- -i67 , 500-.00----"
897,744.69 (621,210.37) 10,777,247.21
7.080.50 1,zrJ8.66 85.000.00
3,915.10 3, 788.77 - 47-; (ix,xL1ft;)
26.108.65 1,987.70 313,429.00
un 10,787 ,35.. 5,991.62 129,5<*>.0<1>
24,800.33 4;:1.01.36---- n__ 297; 723-:00
21,450.14 19,647.89 257.504.75
177,596.68 (16,910.93) 2,132,013.00
2:53.889.82----- --- - (10-2~ 18) -----3.041.-:897~i90
3,177, -475.35 (471,279.58) 38,14-4.962.14
132,280.03 311.120.31
OTHER INCOME
OTHER ~ NET
INTEREST INCOME
MISCINCOHE
-----GAIN ON DfSPbSAC'-":" Go'AS'
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
-OTHER EXPENSES----- ---
MISC.EXPENSES
INTEREST EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
- --'(51;'594.36)
--4-;-3~4;;f1-7:76- --
362,714.67
--4~260.89 ------:l.~),5ie_=_20--~----
4,-496.40 9,816.66
332.46 .00
- --------~---:_0~-u- 129.742.95
9,089.75 150,129.81
4,226..22
98,254.27
---------------------102,480.49
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION To-ciTY
81,112.5(')_
81, 112.50
NON-OPERATING INCOME
~NCOME
cf>'-------~-------- .
~
4,165.00---
5,414.50
1,52-4.39
n ---.00- ----
11,103.89
- - -6;405.20
4,402.16
(1,524.39)
--129-,742.95----
139,025.92
-50,000 :00- ----,
65,000.00'" f
18,300.00 '
--------.00 '"
133,30<1>.00
4,724.11 8,996.40
96,637.60 96,598.95
101 ~361 .71 ---105,595.35
4,272.29 108,000.00
(38.65) 1,159,651.26
----- -4,233.64 -----1, 267 ;651 :26- u_
85,181.25 85,147.18 (34.07) 1,022,175.00
--8:5,1aD~---- "85,147.18- ----------(3,f:07,- _n 1;&22,T75.e0
(17<4 '5(;)~' 2~_ (36,413.15) ~____(1~9,~38 .64 >.______.i4~33.::5..<4!_ ._
(42,223.21) 274,707.16
(2,156,526.26)
~----~--~-- _.' ----
183,076.03
91,631.13
2,197,791.50
c;,
~i
'J-
.~' (
" (
. (
~(,
"3
" (
"
:.[, \
"
, I
e
e
-2114/2006
-11:49AM
Final
e
e
e 2/14/2006
11:48AM
Final
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Month and Period Ended January 31, 2006
CURRENT MONTH YEAR-TO. DATE YEAR- TO-DATE
Over (Under) Budget Over (Under) Budget VARIANCE %
Revenue Actual Budget Dollars Percent Actual Budget Dollars Percent January 2005 2006 vs 2005
1 In patient revenue $4,339,842 $3,783,736 $556,106 14.7% $4,339,842 $3,783,736 $556,106 14.7% $3,422,919 26.8%
2 Out patient revenue 5,412,989 5,208,267 204,722 3.9% 5,412,989 5,208,267 204,722 3.9% 4,439,293 21.9%
3 Resident Revenue 671,951 748,754 (76,803) -10.3% 671,951 746,754 (76,803) -10.3% 641,450 4.8%
4 Total patienUresident revenue $10,424,782 $9,740,757 $684,025 7.0% $10,424,782 $9,740,757 $684,025 7.0% $8,503,662 22.6%
Discounts
5 Governmental & Policy Discount 5,128,009 4,685,918 442,091 9.4% 5,128,009 4,685,918 442,091 9.4% 4,109.291 24.8%
6 Charily Care 36,779 12,500 24,279 194.2% 36,779 12,500 24,279 194.2% 0 nla
7 Total deduction from revenue $5,164,788 $4,698,418 $466,370 9.9% $5,164,788 $4,698,418 $466,370 203.7% $4,109,291 25.7%
8 Net patienUresident revenue $5,259,994 $5,042,339 $217,655 4.3% $5,259,994 $5,042,339 $217,655 4.3% $4,394,371 19.7%
9 Other operating revenues 77,053 82 ,824 (5,771) -7.0% 77 ,053 82,824 (5,771) -7.0% 73,810 4.4%
10 Net operating revenue $5,337,047 $5,125,163 $211,884 4.1% $5,337,047 $5,125,163 $211 ,884 4.1% $4,468,181 19.4%
Exoenses
11 Salaries (includes contract labor) $2,205,074 $2,101,618 $103,456 4.9% $2,205,074 $2,101,618 $103,456 4,9%, $2.079,032 6.1%
12 Employee Benefits 640,205 542,870 97,335 17.9% 640,205 542,870 97,335 17.9% 495,442 29.2%
13 Professional and Medical Fees 571,928 841.125 (69,197) -10.8% 571,928 641,125 (69,197) -10.8% 527,674 8.4%
14 Utilities, Mtnce Contracts & Repairs 211,916 218,272 (6,356) -2.9% 211,916 218,272 (6,356) -2.9% 206,166 2.8%
15 Food, Drugs & Supplies 839,821 715,914 123,907 17.3% 839,821 715,914 123,907 17.3% 634,459 32.4%
16 Other expense 141,534 154,149 (12,615) -8.2% 141,534 154,149 (12,615) -8.2% 130,798 8.2%
17 Minnesota Care 81,218 74,155 7,063 9.5% 81,218 74,155 7,063 9.5% 53,609 51.5%
18 Sad debt 92,010 93,312 (1,302) -1.4% 92,010 93,312 (1,302) -1.4% 81,914 12.3%
19 Inlerest 65,099 65,100 (1) 0.0% 65,099 65,100 (1) 0.0% 57,858 12.5%
20 Depreciation 247,610 249,416 (1,806) -0.7% 247,610 249,416 (1,806) -0.7% 195,329 26.8%
21 Total expenses $5,096,415 $4,855,931 $240,484 5.0% $5,096,415 $4,855,931 $240,484 5.0% $4,462,281 14.2%
Excess of net operating revenue
22 over (under) operating expenses $240,632 $269,232 ($28,600) -10.6% $240,632 $269,232 ($28,600) -10.6% $5,900 3978.5%
Nonoperatina Revenues
23 Investmont income $32,648 $21,953 $10,695 48.7% $32,648 $21,953 $10,695 48.7% $21,075 54.9%
24 Other nonoperating revenue (net) 21,712 19,249 2,463 12.8% 21,712 19,249 2,463 12.8% 21,881 -0.8%
25 Plaza 15 Income / (Loss) 9,361 2,024 7,337 0.0% 9,361 2,024 7,337 0.0% 7,650 0.0%
26 Total nonoperating revenue $63,721 $43,226 $20,495 47.4% $63,721 $43,226 $20,495 47.4% $50,606 25.9%
27 Net Income $304,353 $312,458 ($8,105) -2.6% $304,353 $312,458 ($8,105) -2.6% $56,506 438.6%
28 Patient days 988 973 15 1.5% 988 973 15 1.5% 978 1.0%
29 Resident days 3,707 3,618 89 2.5% 3,707 3,618 89 2.5% 3,591 3.2%
30 Percent occupancy. budget beds - Hospital 52.2% 51.5% 0.8% 1.5% 52.2% 51.5% 0.8% 1.5% 51.7% 1.1%
31 Percent occupancy-budget beds - Nursing Home 97.2% 94.9% 2.3% 2.5% 97.2% 94.9% 2.3% 2.5% 94.2% 3.2%
32 rTE's 504.5 503.7 0.8 0.2% 504.5 503.7 0.8 0.2% 500.5 0.8%
33 Admissions (adjusted) - Hospital only 619 634 (14) -2.2% 619 634 (14) .2.2% 628 -1.4%
34 Expenses (net) per admission (adjusted) . Hospital only 6.985 6,514 471 7.2% 6,985 6,514 471 7.2% 5,981 16.8%
35 Revenue per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only 15,667 14,118 1,549 11.0% 15,667 14,118 1.549 11.0% 12,447 25.9%
36 Net Revonue per admission (adjusted) - Hospital only 7,522 6,954 567 8.2% 7,522 6,954 567 8.2% 6,071 23.9%
37 Discounts as a percent of revenues 49.5% 48.2% 1.3% 2.7% 49.5% 48.2% 1.3% 2.7% 48.3% 2.5%
\JI38 FTE's pcr 100 admissions (adjusted). Hospital only 5.13 4.92 0.20 4.1% 5.13 4.92 0.20 4.1% 4.80 6.8%
39 Days in Net Accounts Receivable 56.9 55.0 1.9 3.5% 63.3 -10.1%
p:--
~
-0 FINSTMNT.xls
Pam Larson
e
RESOLUTION NO. 12913
RESOLUTION TO SELL AT AUCTION SURPLUS PROPERTY
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has accumulated surplus property; and,
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Code provides, pursuant to Section 91.42, for
the sale at auction of surplus property;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON THAT:
The Hutchinson City Council hereby approves the sale at auction of surplus items
identified on Exhibit A.
Approved by the City Council this 28th day of February, 2006.
e
ATTEST:
Steven W. Cook, Mayor
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
e
SCbj'
e
Desk Chairs - Quantity: 3
Christmas Tree Stand - Quantity: 1
Typewriter Stand - Quantity: 1
Electric Switch Boxes - Quantity: 2
e
e
EXHIBIT A
5lb) \
RESOLUTION NO. 12916
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
e
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
Skidsteer Loader $18,5500 replacement Central Yes Farm-Rite Equipment
w trade Garage
_he following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR
~otion Made By:
Seconded By:
Resolution submitted for Council action
Kenenth B. Merrill
by: Finance Director
Date Approved: February 28, 2006
5(1)d-.-
e
e
e
PUBUCA nON NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 05-0424
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 154.004, 154.056, 154.057 AND 154.058 OF
THE HUTCIllNSON MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHANGE LANGUAGE REGULATING
LOT COVERAGE ON SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY LOTS
SECTION 154.004 DEFINITIONS
LOT COVERAGE: The area sf alat e8eUJlied by the priRe~a1l1fld a8eessary
bl:lildiRgs. The area of a lot occupied by; the princioal and accessory buildilllZS including
gazebos and tool sheds: drivewavs (paved and gravel) and decks and patios. The purpose of the
regulation shall be to control the amount of impervious surfaces which affect storm water
infrastructure and the environment.
SECTION 154.056 R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICI'.
(F) Dimensional regulations.
(1) Required lot area, lot covera{!e and dimensions.
R-l Use Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth
Area
Single-family 10,400 square feet 80 feet; for comer lot, 130 feet
residence connected. 110 feet at building line
to public sanitary
sewer
Maximum lot coverage
50% (A survey will be
required if calculations
cannot be verified.)
.
SECTION 154.057 R-2, MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICI'.
(F) Dimensional regulations.
(1) Required lot area, lot covera~e and dimensions.
R-2 Use Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth
Area per Dwelling
Unit
Single-family residence 8,400 square feet 70 feet; for comer lot, 120 feet
connected to public 90 feet at building line
sanitary sewer
Maximurn lot coverage
50% (A survey will be
required if calculations
cannot be verified.)
Two-family dwelling; 5,000 square feet 80 feet 120 feet
-'
5lbJ3
e
e
e
Ordinance # 05-0424
Lot coverage
February 14,2006
P 2
Bee
ee'/eflige 3 5 ~<.
~axllnurnlotcoverage
50% (A survev will be
reauired if calculations
cannot be verified.)
SECTION 154.058 R-3, MEDIUM-mGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICf.
(E) Dimensional regulations.
(1) Minimum lot area, lot coverafle and dimensions.
(a) Requirements.
R-3 Use Minimum Lot Area Minimum Lot W"ulth Minimum Lot Depth
per DweUinJ! Unit
Single family residence 7,200 square feet 60 feet; corner, 80 feet 120 feet
~axirnurnlotcoverage
50% (A survev will be
reauired if calculations
cannot be verified.)
Two-family residence; 5,000 square feet 80 feet 120 feet
ffiBllil.'ftHffi gfel:lfla
eevemge 35Q<.
~axUnurnlotcoverage
50% (A survev will be
required if calculations
cannot be verified.)
.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect March 1, 2006.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 2006.
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
~ayor
5lb:J3
RESOLUTION NO. 12914
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 48 UNIT ADDITION ONTO THE CEDAR CREST ESTATES ASSISTED UVING
FACILITY LOCATED AT 225 SHADY RIDGE ROAD
e
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. ,The property owner and applicant are requesting a conditional use pennit for the construction of a 48 unit addition onto the Cedar
Crest Estates Assisted Living Facility located in the rezoned R2 zoning district with the following legal description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
225 Shady Ridge Rd.-
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Thirty-six (36) in
Township One Hundred and Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West, and more
particularly described as follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest
Quarter of said Section 36, said point lying north 491.40 feet from the Southwest Comer of said
Southwest Quarter of Section 36; thence continuing North along said West line a distance of
170.00 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of75 degrees 37 feet a distance of200.00 feet; thence
deflecting right at an angle of 104 degrees 23 feet a distance of2l9.68 feet; thence deflect right at
an angle of90 degrees ()() feet a distance of 193.73 feet to the point of beginning.
e 2.
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Thirty-six (36) in
Township One Hundred and Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West, described as
follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of said Section 36, where said West line intersects the Northerly 75 foot right-of-way of
Minnesota State Trunk Highway No. 22 and 7; said point lying North 161.4 feet from the
Southwest Corner of said Section 36; thence continuing North alon~ said West line for 330 feet to
a point; thence deflect right at an an~le of90 degrees ()() feet, a distance of 193.73 feet; thence
South 60 degrees 20 feet "tast, for a distance of222.94 feet to a point; thence South for a distance
of 120 feet to the Northerly 75 foot right-of-way of said Trunk Highway No. 22 and 7; and thence
Westerly along said right-of-way line, 400 feet to the point of beginning.
The City Council has considered the reconnnendation of the Plamring Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health,
safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of
properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the ComprebensIve Plan.
1285Hwy7W-
3. The Council has detennined that the proposed use is in hannony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and
the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. Spruce trees must not be placed too close to the intersection.
2. Verification of storm water treatment must be received prior to building permit (from MNDOT)
3. Remove the blacktop presently located on the right of way (in the existing parking lot.)
4. Provide for potential placement for additional parking, if necessary in the future.
5. Garbage enclosure is required to be enclosed with an opaque material.
6. Shielding of light fixtures in the rear of the building would be required.
7. Provide trail easement in exchange for park fees.
8. Move the parking lot entrance to match the entrance to the west.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 2006.
A ITEST:
e
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
5 (C-) ,
e
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 06-0429
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL WNlNG MAP OF THE OTY OF HUTCHINSON
FOR TWO LOTS TO BE REZONED FROM C4 TO R2 LOCATED AT 225 SHADY RIDGE ROAD AND
1285 HWY 7 WEST
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
WHEREAS, the following described real property is hereby rezoned from C4 (Fringe Commercial) to R2 (Medium
Density Residential) as requested by the property ovmers:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
225 Shady Ridge Rd.-
e
1285 Hwy 7 W -
lbat part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Thirty-six (36) in Township
One Hundred and Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West, and more particularly descnbed as
follows, to-wit: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Southwest Quarter ofsaid Section 36, said
point lying north 491.40 feet from the Southwest Comer of said Southwest Quarter of Section 36;
thence continuing North along said West line a distance of 170.00 feet; thence deflect right at an angle
of75 degrees 37 feet a distance of2oo.oo feet; thence deflecting right at an angle of 104 degrees 23
feet a distance of219.68 feet; thence deflect right at an angle of90 degrees 00 feet a distance of193.73
feet to the point of beginning.
lbat part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section Thirty-six (36) in Township
One Hundred and Seventeen (117) North of Range Thirty (30) West, described as follows, to-wit:
Beginning at a point on the West line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section
36, where said West line intersects the Northerly 75 foot right-of-way of Minnesota State Trunk
Highway No. 22 and 7; said point lying North 161.4 feet from the Southwest Comer of said Section 36;
thence continuing North along said West line for 330 feet to a point; thence deflect right at an angle of
90 degrees 00 feet, a distance of 193.73 feet; thence South 60 degrees 20 feet East, for a distance of
222.94 feet to a point; thence South for a distance of 120 feet to the Northerly 75 foot right-of-way of
said Trunk Highway No. 22 and 7; and thence Westerly along said right-of-way line, 400 feet to the
point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission and City Council have considered the effects of rezoning this piece of property;
WHEREAS, there are certain parameters that will make this rezoning appropriate for this area;
THEREFORE; the City hereby officially rezones this property to R2 and it shall take effect upon publication of this
ordinance;
Adopted by the City Council this 14111 day of March, 2006.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
e
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
5Le-) \
e
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
HutcbInoon, MN SS350-Z522
320-!587-S1SlJFu 321-234-4240
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February 22, 2006
TO:
Hutchinson City Council
FROM:
Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECf:
CONSIDERATION OF CONDmONAL USE PERMIT AND REZONING OF TWO LOTS FROM C4 TO R2
FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A 48 UNIT ADDmON ONTO THE CEDAR CREST ESTATES
ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LOCATED AT 225 SHADY RIDGE ROAD AND CONDmONAL USE PERMIT
TO MODIFY THE HWY 7 ACCESS
Pursuant to Section 154.168, 154.057 and 156.09, Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings off act and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning and conditional use permit
HISTORY
The property owners at 225 Shady Ridge Rd are requesting to rezone property located at 225 Shady Ridge Rd (Cedar Crest Estates) and
1285 Hwy 7 W (previous truck stop property) from C4 (Fringe Commercial) to R2 (Medium Density Residential) for a 48 unit addition to
Cedar Crest Estates. A Conditional Use Permit is required for licensed nursing homes in the R2 district and for modifying the Hwy access.
Our zoning ordinance does not address assisted living facilities. Licensed nursing homes would be the nearest use to assisted living
facilities. There was a one-stop- shop with the owner, contractor and engineer on December 30,2005. One of the issues discussed was the
.. need for access on Hwy 7. MNDOT is entering the condemnation process regarding controlled access of the entrance. The letter from
_MNDOT dated January 31, 2006 noted "The proposed assisted living facility on the subject property will have reasonable, convenient and
suitable access from Shady Ridge Road". The property owner planned on using the access for the service entrance in the rear of the
building. They were agreeable to a right-in, right-out access ifnecessary. Mark Scbnobrich has commented on the types of tree specie
selected for the site. Emergency service accessibility must be addressed for the rear of the building. There is adequate parking for the
facility. Shielding of trash containers and lighting were discussed. There is also an existing stormsewer line running across the vacant
parcel which will have to be realigned. Stormwater ponding was also discussed.
e
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
2.
3.
4.
The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on February 9, 2006.
A public hearing was held at which time there were no neighboring property owners present objecting to the request.
Transportation:There was a one-stop- shop with the owner, contractor and engineer on December 30, 2005. One of the issues
discussed was the need for access on Hwy 7, as requested by the applicant. MNDOT is entering the condemnation process
regarding controlled access of the entrance. The letter from MNDOT dated January 31, 2006 noted "The proposed assisted living
facility on the subject property will have reasonable, convenient and suitable access from Shady Ridge Road". The property owner
planned on using the access for the service entrance in the rear of the building and to meet the emergency access requirements.
The property owners also requested consideration of a right-in, right-out access. MNOOT has not approved this type of access and
is pursuing condemnation of the access. The property owner and the City have fmther explored the possibility of obtaining a
shared access with the property to the east This was not something the eastern property owner was willing to pursue.
Parking:The parking requirements state that a minimum of .35 spaces per bed x 70 beds = 25 spaces. There are 41 spaces
indicated on the site plan. There have been concerns regarding parking on the street at Shady Ridge. The proposal would be to
post Shady Ridge no parking. Staff also requested that the property track the activity of parking on the site to better reflect actual
usage. The report indicates that the maximum existing need is 25 spaces. If the assumption was made that parking would be
doubled, it is conceivable that there would be 34 cars at the site plus additional staff peIronnel. There should be some thought
about additional parking placement on the property, if necessary to accommodate future issues. Additionally, the parking lot
entrance should align with the neighboring access to the west. Note that roadway must be repaired "to existing or better pavement
5.
- PrinIed 011 recycled poper -
5 (c) \
Planning Commission
ttinding of Fad -February 22, 2006
edar Crest Estates
age 2
section" The parking lot grading must provide proposed curbing grades within the northeasterly parking lot area. Some gutter
elevations do not appear to have positive drainage to the storm sewer inlets and would require a curb cut to be installed.
6. LandscapingfTrailThe City Forester has commented on the types of tree specie selected for the site. There is a requirement for 1
tree per 800 square feet oflandscaped area. The existing site contains 29 trees. The total site with the new addition would leave a
total of 62,462 square feet pervious; thus requiring a total of 103 trees. The existing trees would be credited and therefore; 74
additional trees would be required. The plan can be amended to reflect that number. The highway parcel has not paid park
dedication fees and staff is recormnending there be a trail easement dedication on the property rather than cash to accommodate a
connection between the facility and what could become the new underpass to the east The grading should provide a suitably
graded trail bed along the southerly limits of the property (verify proposed MnIDOT grading).
7. Storm Water Management Plan: The proposed storm water collection has been reviewed by the City Engineer for the site per the
submitted hydrologylhydraulic calculations. The system assumes that the treatment of storm water is accounted for in the proposed
TH 7/15/22 detention ponds. This is currently being confinned by MnlDOT designers, and their confumation should be
comnnmicated in the near future. The existing, private, storm sewer located south of the existing building will need to be
relocated. The owners are to provide suitable erosion control measures on plans as required per NPDES SWPPP requirements. It
should be noted that there should be a verification of the overflow location for sma1l basin within northeasterly comer of site
providing a minimum of 1.5' of freeboard below building first floor elevation.Sanitary Sewer Services must be verified for the
existing building (show on plans) and note that new service shall be 6" PVC SDR 35.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the rezoning and conditional use permit for the nursing home use with the
following recommendations:
e
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Spruce trees must not be placed too close to the intersection.
Verification of stormwater treatment must be received prior to building permit (from MNDOT)
Remove the blacktop presently located on the right of way (in the existing parking lot)
Provide for potential placement for additional parking, if necessary in the future.
Garbage enclosure is required to be enclosed with an opaque material.
Shielding of light fixtures in the rear of the building would be required.
Provide trail easement in exchange for park fees.
Move the parking lot entrance to match the entrance to the west
The Planning Connnission also voted unanimously to recommend denial of the conditional use permit for the modification of access
onto State Highway 7 based on a number of items: response from MNDOT, city access management ordinance, and the alternate
access could be constructed.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chainnan
Hutchinson Planning Connnission
Cc: Rosalind Ewald, 225 Shady Ridge Road
Citizens Bank, 102 Main St S
John Klick, 1262 Benton St, Anoka MN 55303
e
5Lc- ') \
1'.r..Whl':'~.:~-:A'"'/~/A'"/"""'~/""-____/.oT/""'/~""""'__M"'"",,",~~~~;"~.A"4V''''';.<I';''''',''''4,",,:''''~';'';"l..........-.,,:.f::.~/~~~~/..-.:~.it?'~,.\I....-__......../~""'~'_.A't';...'~jW"/.&';.........,./...../~;.r/~~.0<7,>;lI""h7,;.:.:r~.A'4v."~~.-;.:;-oo:;....;.~..;;;.t.~:i,.:~,
'. DIRECTORS REPORT - PLANNING DEP ARTMENTj
1~~""-/""'.d3:~<;>.;.>o;':':-'~1oc"",;;ooor/-",,/jllO"/"'7~W/.dVI"'(p'>~"""h<<'__/.........-At"""'Y-"'~/,,",'i#h"'~:h'/.r;-...!l';.ot.~~....-.....;p~~~,..,;o,r;;,o"';~~.""'~""''/'u,.'-'~.lM-p/,oll'/'''''''''...;<II'7~~~,;.",~",,y/,..;y...:>;.I'o';::o;..~,,O;;J.'~~,.....-..;..'V.:>'I':'~':c"':',f.
To:
Hutchinson Planning Commission
e
(persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) :
From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Jessica Evans, Judy
Flemming, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P .E., Kent Exner, John Webster,
John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark Schnobrich, Marc Sebora,
Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack,
AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: February 6, 2006 - Meeting Date: February 21, 2006
Applicant
Rosalind Ewald, Cedar Crest Estates Assisted Living
Citizens Bank, Property Owner
REZONING AND CONDmONAL USE PERMIT
Brief Description
The property owners at 225 Shady Ridge Rd are requesting to rezone property located at 225
Shady Ridge Rd (Cedar Crest Estates) and 1285 Hwy 7 W (previous truck stop property) from C4
(Fringe Commercial) to R2. (Medium Density Residential) for a 48 unit addition to Cedar Crest
Estates. A Conditional Use Permit is required for licensed nmsing homes in the R2 district and
also to modify the access off of Highway 7.
e
Existing Zoning:
Property Location:
Lot Size:
Existing Land Use:
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Zoning History:
Applicable
Regulations:
e
,
GENERAL INFORMATION
.v-
4t -
.~/
C4 ( Fringe Commercial)
225 Shady Ridge Road and 1285 Hwy 7 W
The two lots are approximately 3.1 acres
225 Shady Ridge is an assisted living facility and 1285 Hwy 7 W is a
vacant lot
Fringe Commercial and Medium Density Residential
Medium density residential and Commercial along the highway
Both properties are presently zoned commercial. The vacant property
was originally a truck stop/restaurant. The original conditional use
pennit was issued in the early 1970's.
Sectionsl54.l68, 154.057 and 156.09 City Code
2/.-C") ,
Rezoning
Cedar Crest Estates - 225 Shady Ridge Road and 1285 Hwy 7 W
Planning Commission- February 21, 2006
Page 2
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation:
There was a one-stop- shop with the owner, contractor and engineer on December 30,2005. One
of the issues discussed was the need for access on Hwy 7, as requested. by the applicant.
MNDOT is entering the condemnation process regarding controlled access of the entrance. The
letter from MNDOT dated January 31, 2006 noted "The proposed assisted living facility on the
subject property will have reasonable, convenient and suitable access from Shady Ridge Road".
The property owner planned on using the access for the service entrance in the rear of the
building and to meet the emergency access requirements. The property owners also requested
consideration of a right-in, right-out access. MNDOT has not approved this type of access and is
pursuing condemnation of the access. The property owner and the City have further explored
the possibility of obtaining a shared access with the property to the east. This was not something
the eastern property owner was willing to pursue.
S( c':) )
e
Rezoning
Cedar Crest Estates - 225 Shady Ridge Road and 1285 Hwy 7 W
Planning Commission- February 21, 2006
Page 3
Parking:
The parkin&!equirements state that a minimum of .35 spaces per bed x 70 beds = 25 spaces.
There are JJf spaces indicated on the site plan. There have been concerns regarding parking on
the street at Shady Ridge. The proposal would be to post Shady Ridge no parking. Staff also
requested that the property track the activity of parking on the site to better reflect actual usage.
The report indicates that the maximum existing need is 25 spaces. If the assumption was made
that parking would be doubled, it is conceivable that there would be 34 cars at the site plus
additional staff personnel. There should be some thought about additional parking placement on
the property, if necessary to accommodate future issues. Additionally, the parking lot entrance
should align with the neighboring access to the west. Note that roadway must be repaired "to
existing or better pavement section"
The parking lot grading must provide proposed curbing grades within the northeasterly parking
lot area. Some gutter elevations do not appear to have positive drainage to the storm sewer inlets
and would require a curb cut to be installed.
Landscapingffrail
e
The City Forester has commented on the types of tree specie selected for the site. There is a
requirement for 1 tree per 800 square feet of landscaped area. The existing site contains 29 trees.
The total site with the new addition would leave a total of 62,462 square feet pervious; thus
requiring a total of 103 trees. The existing trees would be credited and therefore; 74 additional
trees would be required. The plan can be amended to reflect that number.
The highway parcel has not paid park dedication fees and staff is recommending there be a trail
easement dedication on the property rather than cash to accommodate a connection between the
facility and what could become the neW lUlderpass to the east. The grading should provide a
suitably graded trail bed along the southerly limits of the property (verify proposed Mn/DOT
grading).
Storm Water Management Plan
The proposed storm water collection has been reviewed by the City Engineer for the site per the
submitted hydrology/hydraulic calculations. The system assumes that the treatment of storm
water is accolUlted for in the proposed TII 7/15/22 detention ponds. This is currently being
confirmed by MnIDOT designers, and their confirmation should be communicated in the near
future. The existing, private, storm sewer located south of the existing building will need to be
relocated. The owners are to provide suitable erosion control measures on plans as required per
NPDES SWPPP requirements. It should be noted that there should be a verification of the
overflow location for small basin within northeasterly comer of site providing a minimum of 1.5'
of freeboard below building first floor elevation.
Sanitary Sewer Services must be verified for the existing building (show on plans) and note that
new service shall be 6" PVC SDR 35.
e
oLe-) \
e
e
e
Rezoning
Cedar Crest Estates - 225 Shady Ridge Road and 1285 Hwy 7 W
Planning Commission- February 21, 2006
Page 4
Analysis and
Recommendation:
Staff discussed the issues with the Hwy 7 access and suggested options to resolve the access to
the rear of the building. It seems that none of the options would be viable considering the owners
wishes for construction scheduling. Staff would recommend approval of the rezoning and
conditional use pennit for the nursing home with the following recommendations:
1.
2.
Spruce trees must not be placed too close to the intersection.
Verification of stormwater treatment must be received prior to building permit (from
MNDOn
Eliminate parking along Shady Ridge Road.
Remove the blacktop presently located on the right of way (in the existing parking
lot.)
Provide for potential placement for additional parking, if necessary in the future.
Garbage enclosure is required to qe enclosed with an opaque material.
Shielding of lig!1! f1j(tures ~ the building would be required.
Provide trail'4rirei~oryark fees.
Move the parking lot entrance to match the entrance to the west.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Staff would further recommend denial of the conditional use pennit for the modification of access
onto State Highway 7 based on a number of items: response from MNDOT, city access
management ordinance, and the alternate access could be constructed.
Cc: Rosalind Ewald, 225 Shady Ridge Road
Citizens Bank, 102 Main St. S
5:~\
e
e
e
M
E
MO-RAN
1)
U M
TO: Julie Wischnack, Director PlanninglZoninglBuilding
FROM: Kent Exner, City Engineer
RE: Cedar Crest Estates
DATE: February 14, 2006
As requested, the Preliminary Site Plan for the Cedar Crest Estates building addition has been reviewed. These
plans were prepared by SEH, Inc. and received by the City on January 18, 2006. Listed below are comments
that should be acknowledged and/or addressed prior to construction:
· Storm Water Management Plan - The proposed storm water collection seems to be &PfllOPtiate for
the site per the submitted hydrologylhydraulic calculations. As previously discussed, the system
assumes that the treatment of storm water is accounted for in the proposed TII 7/15/22 detention
ponds. This is currently being confirmed by Mn/DOT designers, and their confirmation should be
communicated in the near future.
. TII 7 Access - Verify status of TII 7 access considerations with Mn/DOT Planning staff. If
access point is allowed to remain and is reconstructed, consider the replacement of the existing
CMP culverts (verify proposed MnlDOT grading) and install future pedestrian curb ramp opening
within the proposed centrance curbing.
· Future Trail Accommodations - Provide a suitably graded trail bed along the southerly limits of
the property (verify proposed MnlDOT grading).
. Shady Ridge Road Entrance - Align southerly parking lot entrance to be perpendicular to Shady
Ridge Road.
. Shady Ridge Road Disturbance - Note that roadway must be repaired "to existing or better
pavement section".
. Sanitary Sewer Services - Verify location of existing building sanitary service (show on plans)
and note that new service shall be 6" PVC SDR 35.
· Emergency Overflow - Verify overflow location for small basin within northeasterly comer of site
providing a minimum of 1.5' of freeboard below building FFE.
· Parking Lot Grading - Verify proposed curbing grades within the northeasterly parking lot area.
Some gutter elevations don't appear to have positive drainage to the storm sewer inlets and would
require a curb cut to be installed.
· Erosion Control - Provide suitable erosion control measures on plans as required per NPDES
SWPPP requirements.
. City Standard Detail Plates - Will be provided to developer's engineer via e-mail.
Please let me know if you have any questions regarding any of the comments discussed above.
B
.see') \
\~~ ~~~~~~~~'~~~.~~i*-:~ T )11
\ I :
\ I
\
e
l
l:y
e
\
\
~.
'r.)
\~}
)-"".,
!.)
. /.".... I......'.
..\\-.' ~..
,
/~ ....
-
, ...
\"..''''1. ....
~;~; ~)
\ ,.'.,
\~'
-
1/18/lOO6
FOR RfVEW OIU
_FOR
COHSTRUCTIOH
CfIWl CJf5T ESTATES
........""'"
--
-,
\
\
/
'.J"I:"."'"
(IUP!,I,
I. ..
.I
I
~t.'.IiU:"~U:l:ai;ai
'[l1!IOllS
;;,7~
=-
1.Y\
~a;IIlIt.IA"1EKll
.:xC)'
,
,
~ r
"\411:
v--J?
~ I/l
'I!; ~
a~, ~
~;! I IJ.J
:tl ~ ~ ,...
'OJ ; I rfl
~il ~
~l c.J
R~ i J ~
\ 3
w II
-I loo,
~ i~5
....~ 0 I~CI
: nn
~ ...1
e
I ~ l~
2: '15.11.
~ 8.s
\
\
e
.-.....-- ....
,,-~
~
5(c..~ ,
e
e
.
\
.
.
.
\ ~
: ~
. ...
-'
CI
...
. ~
. V)
.
\
,
,
o
z:
...
i~
~j!:
V) V)
...
)(!Z
~~
uw
r>
~:
.-
z:-o
<p PWOll -hIli ApWIIS
..,
~
a..-~ ::r-.:._
. ~ "'0Jts
, 0-1
/ I
!~
, I
, I
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
I I
. , I
I I ,
_ _1 .{ 1
-....:.:..;;.;-- ----,--.--.', ~.'-_.,.~ .~
tit
,
.
I
.
,
~.=-.r.J.---.....~ :..,. ..~~... .
.,
. -
'"
N
..
"t-
o
-
~
...
~
.
~ .' tl
Q..
i
Q..
C2
tii
~
c
. i
g
...
VI
.
0
Z J
- VI i
.. IS"
! ~:
, z .VI ~
III ell ~
~ffi~
<b I ~
pI
i:
~ vI
m It
E=
Ij 11i
0
lJJ
V> si
0
a.. ~i
0 it
a:
0-
'"
. - i~
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
, I
/ I
I I
IL
I I
1/-
I I
I I
I I
I I
I /.
\
.'." -..........
.s~~L
..
e
e
e
Leaves
Page 1 of 1
Bonnie Baumetz
From: Mark Schnobrich
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 10:02 AM
To: Bonnie Baumetz; Julie Wischnack
Subject: Cedar~Landscape Revisions
I have reviewed the Cedar Crest Estates landscape plan and have a few suggested changes in regards to the
specie selection for the site.
Planned specie Selection
Recommended Specie Selection
Location
Sugar Maple
Front Yard Linden or Am. Linden
SW comer of Building
Marshall Ash
Swamp White Oak or Honey Locust
All Locations
Colorado Blue Spruce
White Spruce or Black Hills Spruce
Sugar Maple
Hackberry or Freemanii Maple
East side by road entrance
These recommendations are based on vulnerable tree conditions that will exist out in this location in repect to
wind and soil conditions.
212J2006
~
.5Le-) \
.3::.1.:aM::.I..;r. :EJ....L.......II~......,:l iF...~""iF.1i...U .....II_=-..:a~"W
FEB-l~-2006 02:02 PM KLICK IHTER ARCH DESICH 763 422 ~~4~ P.0l
e
~--h..
/::..~ . \ ~\~
0' \,1 \.
'-.::\..\.P'-\....;\'. \., ' -
........-... 1~..~lw.tIlftS."""
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · · . · .\...... ~~ ~J
lif..lI-tU-'1Stfi
RE t'~~I7f03I._~
CErvED jkl;,.k.li....-.......
FEB 1 5 lD06
gty of Hutchinson
Dept. of P. Z. & B
PIlIlEC1\
8UIJEC'n
Ju'-'e,. \4.'''~AA''~
~~ "'l,..,~
\~ ~ 'Zooc-
t'-.f. """\fL ~,. €h""",f.~
&c.l ~-n~ .."Ut,
1'01
null
00'f;:
~-r~ rWT., ~ -r'1L EY-J~,",,(" ~'''''I-r< ~E. ~
~,~OU.,.,..~ ~ \M-=m.l.""( '~"c:t-.
e
~m,*,"'-'U"(, -r.,e.fLE. AfE. five. ~\~U()~':t ~~-
e T~I- \..:) ~ GL..uMf \~Y1-" ~ 10 ~". ~ ~ ~,~
A6olI\ " -. ~~ ~'-..;E. ~,.. 64~"') '(MrC. 04L
~~ .~~-r \4'1...."+ \~ LocA1tO ~ ,~~ ~A(Z.
CeJ*h-r)'fA/I.o.
,.~ ~~\C)U? A.p.fA ~ -r~ ~\~,.,~ ~rl'~ ,~
'2D,44' ~, ,...~ tiraJlOUt, ~~ fC?~ -r~ ~
~\~ \':> l#1...) 4i# '2.. ~ ~ A. '\o1AL, cf &% t q OC\ ""=*.
-(~ fEAI\DU~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~1\,,",," "?t~
~U\u.~ 1h' 2.\~ ~\O\lQ\l'=' ~ ~\ Ca4'~CL\~
~ ~~t4~1i~ ~U-l~ z~f~,
A? lfJO\'-A-ra> ~t.,) ~~ . ~~ ~" -r~ tf
CD4~lOE.~(oL,'( LA~u.. 61-u.,
\~
.
!s(c:J \
It
a
288
Hutchinson - Land Usage
(3) The design of any access to Trunk Highway 7, including the width, grade, and radii shall I
conform with MnIDOT guidelines and standards.
\
J
(4) The driveway must be of sufficient length to allow vehicles to circulate on the site without
causing vehicles using the access to interfere with traffic movement on Trunk Highway 7.
(C) Residential access. Residential access must be designed so vehicles have can turn around on
the property without bacldng on to Trunk Highway 7.
(Ord. 03-361, passed 5-25-04)
~ 156.09 MODIFICATION OF ACCFSS STANDARDS.
(A) Purpose. The city recognizes that the complete and interconnected supporting local street
network necessary for full compliance with this chapter may not be available due to conditions beyond
the control of the individual property owner. The following procedure has been established to consider
modifications of the access standards when necessary to allow reasonable economic use of property as
permitted by the underlying zoning and to provide reasonably convenient and suitable access to every
legal lot or parcel of record.
(B) Application requirements. An application for a modification of access stanclardsshall include:
. (
(1) A complete access plan as required in ~ 156.05;
(2) Additional information as may be required by the Access.Management Administrator or
recommended by MnJDOT or other affected road authority, such as a traffic impact study or a signal
justification report.
(C) Procedures for review and approval. The procedures for the review and approval of a .
modification of access standards shall be the same as for an access plan as specified in ~ 156.05.
(0) Findings for approval of modification of access standards.
(1) Public street connections. The approving authority may approve a public street connection
as a modification of access standards when the proposed street connection meets all of the following
findings: .
(a) The proposed street connection is necessary to provide reasonable connectivity to the
supporting road network or to provide access to an area that is otherwise isolated due to topography,
unique natural features, or existing land use and street patterns;
. . (b) The proposed street connection is necessary for the property to be put to reasonable_.,
economic use as permitted by the underlying zoning; and .. (.
5~
re
.
.
Trunk Highway 7 Access Management Overlay Ordinance
289
(c) The proposed street connection conforms to the extent practicable with the access
spacing, location, and design standards in ~~ 156.07 and 156.08.
(2) Private access. The approving authority may approve a private access as a modification
of access standards when the proposed access meets all of the following findings:
(a) The property retains access rights.
(b) Reasonably convenient and suitable alternative access is not available or attainable from
the local road network or by shared access and/or cross access to adjacent properties due to one or more
of the following circumstances:
1. Use of the alternative access would disrupt a protected wetland under the Wetland
Conservation Act, a protected shoreland under the Shoreline Zoning Act, or a steep slope (greater than
12%);
2. The affected road authority will not authorize the necessary extension of the
connecting road system;
3. The adjacent property owner will not authorize the necessary shared access or
cross-access agreement; or
4. The affected road authority will not authorize use of the local connecting road
system due to projected impacts of the anticipated traffic on the structural or geometric capacity of the
roadway or the safety and livability of the surrounding area.
(c) The proposed private access connection is necessary for the property to be put to
reasonable economic use as permitted by the underlying zoning.
(d) The proposed private access conforms to the extent practicable with the access spacing,
location and design standards in U 156.07 and 156.08.
(E) Conditions of approval. The approving authority may attach conditions to the approval of a
modification of access standards as deemed necessary to promote the spirit and intent of this chapter.
(1) The access may be approved as an interim access to be phased out at a future time or
condition;
(2) Turning movement to and from the access may be restricted at the time of construction or
at a future date, based upon existing or anticipated traffic volumes;
(3) The access may be required to serve existing or future adjacent property by a shared
entrance or cross access easement as provided in ~ 156.07(B)(3); or
.5(g \
--
--
-
290
Hutchinson - Land Usage
(
(4) Other conditions may be required based on the conclusions and recommendations of a'
traffic impact study and/or the review by MnlDOT or another affected road authority.
(Ord. 03-361. passed 5-25-04)
g 156.10 APPEALS.
(A) Applicant may appeal decision. An applicant whose access plan is not approved, or is approved
with conditions not agreed to by the applicant, shall have 30 days to appeal the decision in writing,
stating the reasons for which an appeal should be approved. Appeals of decisions approved by the Access
Management Administrator must be considered according to the procedures set forth for variances under
the Zoning Code. Appeals of decisions on access plans incorporated in related applicitions shall be
considered according to the procedures for appeals set forth in the zoning and subdivision ordinances.
(B) Notice to road authorities. The Access Management Administrator must notify any affected
road authority, including Mn/DOT, a minimum of ten days prior to the scheduled public hearing for the
appeal.
(C) Conditions. The city may impose conditions on the approval of any appeal as necessary to
effect compliance with the spirit and intent of this chapter.
(Ord. 03-361, passed 5-25-04)
(
:k)\j!O.-
4lll~So,-..,~
~ ..
t.~~ "
tit
Minnesota Department of Tmnsportation
District 8 - WillmarlMarshalVHutchinson
2505 Tmnsportation Road
WilImar, MN 56201
Office Tel: 320-231-5195
800-657-3792
Fax: 320-231-5168
www.mndot.gov
January 31, 2006
.,~.....
'" -:-..
"'(6' ....~l ~
(,. ~ v
~~~~ <'va.
o,~ i)
.~.1I
City of Hutchinson
Planning
Attn: Bonnie Baumetz
City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Citizen Bank Property - 1285 Highway 7 W
Dear Ms. Baumetz:
Thank you for providing MnlDOT with your request for review of the Rezoning and
Conditional Use Pennit for the above property.
Upon review of the request, Mn/DOT offers the following comments:
e
1.
2.
Mn I DOT is instituting controlled access on Highway 7 affecting the subject
parcel identified as PID 36-117-30-0260.
Mn /DOT is closing the existing entrance from TH 7 to the subject property
and is entering the condemnation process regarding controlled access of the
the entrance.
The proposed assisted living facility on the subject property will have
reasonable, convenient and suitable access from Shady Ridge Road.
3.
If you have any questions, please contact Peter Waskiw at 320-231-3773.
Sincerely,
t......J.
aC. .
- -- .
/
W~.-. ·
-
./
Patrick Weidemann
08 Planning Director
e
An equal opportunity employer
~\~
p:nII. CITIZENS BANK
~ & TRUST CO.
February 7, 2006
Patrick Weidemann
D8 Planning Director
MN Dept. of Transportation
2505 Transportation Road
Willmar, MN 56201
~~
f:"~B ~b
08
8tOf~_'?006
Ofp.--;,~
. '~cl8
Re: Condemnation of Citizens Bank Property at 1285 Hwy 7 W, Hutchinson
Dear Mr. Weidemann:
As you are aware, Citizens Bank & Trust Co. has entered into a purchase
agreement with Roz and Henry Ewald, owners of Cedar Crest Estate, Inc.
Cedar Crest plans to expand their facility and would like MNDOT to reoonsider
the elimination of the aocess on Hwy 7. Citizens Bank and Cedar Crest ask that
MNDOT consider a limited access "right in/right out" to be used for emergency
and delivery vehicles.
Please contact me with questions or further discussion at 320-234-0621.
Sincerely,
~~
Timothy B. Ulrich
President
TBUlcml
co Roz Ewald, Cedar Crest
Bonnie Baumetz, City of Hutchinson'/
102 Main Street Souib . P.O. Box 339 " Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350-0339
Phone 32<Y587-2233 . FAX 3201587-5738 . WWW.cbhUlCh.com
CB On-Call 32G'23+6234 . ThU-Free 8881234-2910 . M~ FDIC
SCe) \
e
CEDAR CREST ESTATE, INC.
CARSfTRUCKS IN PARKING lOT FOR LAST WEEK
2/07106 to 2/14106
TIME
9:30 AM
1:00 PM
9:00 AM
1:00 PM
10:30 AM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
1:00 PM
9:00 AM
3:30 PM
8:30 AM
2:00 PM
DATE
WED
WED
THURS
THURS
FRIDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
TUESDAY
# OF CARS
11
17
15
17
13
15
8
10
15
12
16
12
We did not have any in service meetings or parties for the residents this week.
During our monthly inservice when all the employees are here, I would quess that we
possibly a maximum of 25 cars.
e
-
. Thanks, Roz Ewald
5~)\ ~
e
e
e
MEETING NOTES
CEDAR CREST ADDmON
225 SHADY RIDGE RD .
12/30/05
Attendees:
Jim Popp, Kent Exner, Roz Ewald, Damon Ewald, Dan Fischer, Dan Huebert.
Dave Hunstad, Dick Nagy, John Klick, Justin Black, Julie Wischnack, Mark
Schnobrich, Lenny Rutledge and Bonnie Baumetz
Julie W. opened the meeting with introductions and explained the process.
John K., project architect, stated this will be a 48 unit two story addition. He commented on the
site plan and the parking lot plans. He stated the existing parking lot will not be utilized in the
same way. Only 10 spaces in the existing parking lot will be used. The visitors parking will be
28 spaces off the formal entrance. The visitors access will be off Shady Ridge Rd. . There will be
a service access off Hwy 7 with 13 stalls for employee parking in the rear of the building. The
total number of spaces being 41.
Roz E. stated they would like to begin construction in April, 2006.
Kent E. commented on the existing storm sewer line that runs across the vacant parcel. He
explained this will have to be realigned. There cannot be construction over the line. He
commented on the possible ways to treat stormwater runoff and explained the need for a pond
when there is I acre or more of impervious surface. He explained MNDOT does plan on closing
the access off Hwy 7 but Citizens Bank has not signed off on closing the access. He will discuss
the future intent of the parcel with MNDOT. Kent commented on the future School Rd
pedestrian access.
Jim P. commented on access and turnaround for emergency vehicles. He explained hydrants
must be within 600 feet of a sprinkled building. The hydrants on this parcel are within the 600
foot requirement. There will be a hydrant at the intersection. He commented on the need for
wider halls for emergency service.
Bonnie B. commented on the need to shield outside lighting from the residential development,
The trash containers must be shielded. John K. stated there will be no fencing of the area. The
two parcels must be combined in order to construct the building across the line. Staff will check
with the City Attorney regarding the need to rezone and conditional use permit.
Lenny R. explained the need for 2 hour separation walls according to occupancy. John K. stated
they list the wall and floor types. He commented on the mechanical.
Lenny R. stated the City needs the complete plans and time to react to the application. He
explained the plans would include architectural and structural plans and mechanical design. He
stated the plumbing is sent to the State and takes approximately 6 weeks. Sprinkler plans also go
to the State. He explained he needs an accurate count of fixtures for the plumbing permit. He
stated the building and mechanical permit is based OIi cost of the project.
5(~~ \
e
e
e
Predevelopment notes
Cedar Crest Addition - 225 Shady Ridge Rd
12130/05
Page 2
John K. stated the laundry will remain in the existing building. He explained there will be hold-
open doors in the building.
Dan F. will be the project manager.
Mark S. explained there must be a landscape plan provided to the City. He stated the soils are
bad and compacted on the lot. He commented on the ordinance requiring 1 tree per 800 sq. ft. of
landscaped area. He stated the soils must be amended.
Justin B. stated the survey is completed.
Julie W. commented on berming the parking lot from the highway. She stated the landscaper
should contact the City Forester when completing the .landscape plan. The plan must be to the
City before the Planning Commission meeting.
Dick N. stated there is a 4" or 6" water service along the south property line. He asked what size
meter would be needed for the building. John K. stated they would need a lllfger service for
sprinkling. He explained the sewer runs to. Shady Ridge Rd. He stated the water line is 6" to the
south and asked if they could have two separate water services to the buildings.. Dick N. stated
he would rather see one service but has no preference. There cannot be construction over a
water line.
Dave H. explained electric service is fed from the old trunk stop. They should discuss allowing
2 electrical services with the State Electric inspector Fred Brown. Dave H. explained the
transformer and pedestal must be moved. He stated the main service is across Shady Ridge Rd.
John K.. stated they will move the transformer. Dave H. explained the transformer is feeding
only the existing building. Moving the transformer would be only the electrician cost. The
transformer depends on the size of the service needed. He stated he will work with them for
placement. There is not additional cost for placement. He explained they must touch base with
John Webster regarding the natural gas service.
Julie W. asked if the property was torrens, title or abstract. Roz E. state both parcels are abstract.
Justin B. state the timing would depend on the when the final site plans are complete. John K..
stated the plans will be complete by the middle of January. Julie W. explained the deadline
dates. Staff will pursue the MNDOTaccess issues.
Julie W. reported she would verify with City Atty. Sebora regarding a Conditional use permit
amendment. She commented on the SAC and WAC charges based on usage. The building
permit fee is based on the construction costs. Kent E. stated this portion of the Hwy will be
reconstructed in 2007. Final grading and landscaping may be completed after the Hwy work is
done.
~~
e
e
e
Predevelopment notes
Cedar Crest Addition - 225 Shady Ridge Rd
12130105
Page 3
Lenny R. stated soil erosion will be an issue. Justin B. will apply for the MPDS permit and
provide copies to the City. Julie W. commented on the need for a SWPPP for erosion control
the contractor and owner must sign application.
Bonnie B. commented on the parking requirement of .35 spaces per bed. John K. stated there
will be 70 beds total. Bonnie stated the requirement for 70 beds would be 24.5 or 25 spaces.
They have met the requirement with 41 spaces. Roz will document present parking circulation.
She stated there are 44 employees total. 15 - 20 employees would be the largest number of staff
at any time. Bonnie B. stated any signage would require a permit.
5{ c'j ,
- .
.....,..---"""" ~-'~--==-- -
p u III ! :;/"
. .e.,7..""i.- NOU:lIllIlSIIn .
~ l!QllllN w -- ~
- A lNO MlI!lIlQj .- """........ ~
-...,- m_ ~i~
--~
..-...... 9llOlI1JJ7. ~ SllYilllS3llJ lMID
",-",--' S~otSl^,~====":':"=
-.~-, ... "\"
-- I.-..
e/j
I?' -vlf'll
( "".
: ~ 4.~
, .f1} ~~
"- !!
e'
~ II il
:111
11
-"
e
f
/--
-~ ~-~--
-\
I,
\ \
\
\ ,
\~
I I
I '
I \
I
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
0W0lf 3OOnl,,l.CMt5
(
f
5(c~)
.-......UWll:nO -
If ~" - I --
MClIDI1lll5ItOJ . .Jl5
..-.-- lK>llOl< w -- ~
.-
- nlO A\3IA3lIlIW -- ~........ ~
_....,- ~
--- . 900U an S3J.YlSl.l.5Jll) lMID
..-.....
...........~..... ....
.....__1 """'"" ,
- -
r- ---- --"\
I !J$
Iii ....!;
~ fJj IS lS
~ jJ
I
!IIIII'IIIIIII,IIII
I 11I11 I
"'I'l<ll'"
,--- ..--
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
e"."
,
,
,
, I ~.. =.,
, ~ ~.
'--- It(. I~ ~~~ '
~_=--=-----=-~_~~ _ ~ _~. _ ~....l ~...~ _
f
e
"
e
e
e
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 06-{)430
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
VACATING UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ALONG THE PROPERTY
LINE LOCATED BETWEEN 1408 AND 1412 HERIT AGE AVE NW FOR THE
PURPOSE OF COMBINING THE TWO LOTS INTO ONE LARGER LOT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOME
THE CTIY COUNCIL OF THE CTIY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly
made and was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in
the best interests of the City to vacate utility and drainage easements located in Fairway
Estates Second Addition.
Section 2. That the utility and drainage easements to be vacated are described as follows:
Vacate the 6.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement lying easterly of and adjoining
the westerly line of Lot 12, Block 1, Fairway Estates Second Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof. The northerly line of the easement to be vacated being the
southerly line of the Northerly 10.00 feet of said Lot 12 and the southerly line of said
easement to be vacated being the survey line in said Lot 12 as shown on said Fairway
Estates Second Addition.
and;
Vacate the 6.00 foot wide drainage and utility easement lying westerly of and adjoining
the easterly line of Lot 13, Block 1, Fairway Estates Second Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof. The northerly line of the easement to be vacated being the
southerly line of the Northerly 10.00 feet of said Lot 13 and the southerly line of said
easement to be vacated being the Survey line in said Lot 13 as shown on said Fairway
Estates Second Addition.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication.
Adopted by the City COlmcil this 14th day of March, 2006.
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
ATIEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
s(c)~
e
e
e
...
111 Hassan Street SE
HutchlD8oo, MN 55350-2522
32e-587-S151JFu 320-234-4240
Hutchinson City Center
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February 22, 2006
TO:
Hutchinson City Council
FROM:
Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTIUTY EASEMENTS
ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE LOCATED BETWEEN 1408 AND 1412 HERITAGE AVE NW FOR
THE PURPOSE OF COMBINING TIlE TWO LOTS INTO ONE LARGER LOT FOR TIlE
CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY HOME
Pursuant to Hutchinson City Charter, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings off act
and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request.
msTORY:
The property owner is requesting to vacate drainage and utility easements along both sides of the lot line between
1408 and 1412 Heritage Ave NW for the purpose of combing the two lots to one larger lot Because the properties
are in the same subdivision a tax combination will be allowed by the County. The prospective. owner will be
constructing a single family home on the combined lots.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the sIDTounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, February 9, 2006. .
3. A public hearing was held at which time there were no neighboring property owners present objecting to
the request
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission unanimously reconunended approval of the request for the vacation of the drainage and utility easements
with the following reconunendations:
I. Relocation of any utilties will be at the property owner's expense.
2. Relocate the conductor to street light, at the owners expense.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Cc: Compton Anderson Construction, 18482 - 202 Circle
Jason Palmby, 4295 Shorewood Trail, Medina MN 55340
- _ 00 ~Ied poper-
5(L~
e
e
e
~~4"""/""-/AI"7""'/_/'-W~/""""''''-''''''4oI'I':>''''''/'/'''''/'''''''''''AO;''''''"",",/'/'p;;\qI'/~,;o;o;:W7~'i'",(''''~'~/-'';''''....4~/_/..../...."/;<../....../..../~;lIF.>..../...../.....MI"~~~....kn~~p<;<.':>.....,"..7....XM.....n..w/......./.6.'4IIV.P'"/~1olIl"'''''4*?'''''Y~''''''';-i:
. .
~ DIRECTORS REPORT - PLANNING DEP ARTMENT ~
~6A1""/............./..r/"""/.Y__/''#I"_/'-'/_.MO'"..w/''''/'''/#/''''-/~W/.ol!l'"/'''''/I'~~''''-/A>''''''4''''/.4'''''__4o<'Y...../_/..lIY_~...~~/~...~..../,.~""'7A'71/......~..........,..-/M'..,../..../~_.L"'7""'-';;,../.M'7~..-v~.#""""'_/~."../.IR.;a
To:
Hutchinson Planning Commission
(Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold):
From: Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Jessica Evans,
Judy Flemming, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, John
Webster, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark
Schnob rich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan
Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AlCP, and Bonnie Baumetz
Date: February 6, 2006-Meeting Date: February, 21, 2006
Applicant: Compton Anderson Construction
Jason Palmby, Property Owner
VACATION OF EASEMENTS
Brief Description:
The property owner is requesting to vacate drainage and utility easements along both sides of
the lot line between 1408 and 1412 Heritage Ave NW for the purpose of combing the two lots to
one larger lot. Because the properties are in the same subdivision a tax combination will be
allowed by the County. The prospective owner will be constructing a single family home on the
combined lots.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning:
R1 Planned Development District ( Single Family)
Property Location:
1408 and 1412 Heritage Ave NW
Lot Size:
Approximately .5 acre
Existing Land Use:
Single family residential
Adjacent Land Use
and Zoning:
R1 (Single Family Residential)
Comprehensive Land
Use Plan:
Traditional Residential Neighborhood
Zoning History:
N/A
5(L~
Vacation of Easements
Between. 1408 and 1412 Heritage Ave NW
Planning Commission - February 21, 2006
Page 2
Applicable
Regulations:
City Charter and City Code
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation:
Heritage Ave NW
Parking:
N/A
Analysis and
Recommendation:
Property line to be removed
The consensus of the staff is to recoJillllend approval with the
followingreco~endations: d-~..~ 0- {-. {(.~ " .....
1. Relocahon of n:ltJITal..ga{~'~9:lfiOOs WIll be at the 1 \..../~
property owner's expense. 0
2. Relocate the conductor to street light, at the owners
expense.
Cc: Compton Anderson Construction, 18482202 Circle
Jason Palmby, 4295 ShorewoodTrail, Medina Mn 55340
S(c~
~ ___w
F~B-el-e6 WED eS:18 ~M PELLJHEH LAND eURYEVING a2e~eTS7~2
e
SKETCH 8 DESCRIPTION FOR
COMPTON ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION) INC
DESCRP110H FOR PROP09Ell EASEMENT VACAlIOH
lot 12. SIocII I, FNRWAY E9TAlES SECONl ADOIT1ON
Vac.n. Ill. e.oo 1001 wlclt drGlnOgo and u1l/IJ _omonl tying .a.ttl'ly of and
odPlnlng llIe w"'om Hn. of leI 12. IlIoclt I. FAIRWAY ESTAlES SECOND AODmON.
OOConllnG ro lilt "urcitd pial Ih".of. The northatty Ilno af the .o.em.nt to b.
vao.lld being tile ..uti>erlJ lint 01 the Northtr1y 10.00 r"I or ooId lol 12 and lilt
SOUtMrty line 01 .oId 'OIt1MIII ro b. YQOQted b'iII<l 'b. SUrvty lno In .oId LoI 12
a. oIIown on .00d FAIRWAY ESTAtES SECotIl ADDITION.
~
DESCRI'TION FOR PRoPOSED ~ASfMfNT VACAllOH
lol 13. Block I. FAIRWAY ESTATES SECOII> Al>OITION
Vcn:<rte tho 6.00 1001 wide "-0III0ge one! util1y ...om.nl tying wnlorty of .nd
adJoining lite t..terly Ino of lal 13. 8Iock I. FAJR'IIAY ESTAlES SECOIIl AOOITION.
O<COI'd1ng ro Iha rt<ord.. plat Iharo.I. TIlt nor1llerly 1In. a1111e .........nl 10 bo
_o"d b.lng Ill. louthorb lno of ,Ilt Northtrty 10.00 toe, .f ..Id lOI 13 ond tn.
.0000000y lint 01 .00d ......nl ro Do _al'<l I>tln.u Tho survey Ilno In .ollllal 13
DO .hown on .old FAfNlAY fSTAlES SECOII> ADllIT1ON.
t>.VENUE
NW
?r
\'\ 't. ~S~ fl..G't.
. 1'2~" ltoeal.110
,,'Zll I
l-/06.22
III
30
seale
In
liD
.
1 eet
e
<$'/
,,~I
/
--------,
/.
/
I
I
/
/ I
I II)
I Ii
/
/
/
II
~
~
,~~
'<. y-
I -.........
I
--.
14
Dr.... I lItH, ~nt
--
--..........
--..........
/
/
I
---I- .
/ --~"1.5
---
/
I
,
,
... ,',' ._-1
....V " \
, " \
" . N8B"3I'Qt"e '
/ N88'31 '02oe. 16.88 \
.2UIO
.
e
PEWhEN lANll S\/fIIJE'tIIG
OUTLOT D
IfJTQltlSON MN
JOIl NO. oeo 13
p."et
~
,('~ ~Ilh...
B () -~
~Of~~ <'006'
Of~~~
4IJ
.~
e
RESOLUTION NO. 12915
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 190 FOOT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 412 3RD AVE NW (NEW DIMENSION PLATING)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. The property owner and applicant are requesting a conditional use permit for the construction of a 190 foot
monopole tower to be located on the rear lot ofthe New Dimension Plating property located on 3rd Ave NW.
The property is located in the I/C district with the following legal description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
Section 36,Township 117, Range 30, McLeod County, Minnesota,
described as beginning at a point on the North line of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, said point being
898.00 feet East, assumed bearing, of the Northwest Comer of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence continuing
East 42.00 feet along said North line; thence South 33.00 feet;
thence East 264.00 feet to a point 1204.00 feet East of and 33.00
. feet South of said Northwest Comer of the Southeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter of said Section 36; thence South 290.14 feet
to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Dakota Rail Inc.;
thence Southwesterly 312.18 feet along said Northerly right-of-
way line to a point South of the point of beginning; thence North
384.81 feet to the point of beginning.
e 2.
The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
prop<?sed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
antIcipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan, if the conditions, as outlined below are met.
CONCLUSION
The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. There is to be buffering on the rear of the property. The proposal would be for a
60 foot row of lilacs. The Forester should have the final approval over specie type.
e
2. Liability Insurance coverage to cover damage to buildings/vehicles etc. on other
properties.
3. The Airport Commission must provide their recommendation.
4. The applicant is agreeing to co-location opportunities (Section 154.119 any
proposed commercial tower shall be designed, structurally, electronically and in
all respects, to accommodate both the applicant's antennas and comparable
antennas for at least two additional users if the tower is over 100 feet in height or
for at least one additional user if the tower is over 75 feet in height. Towers must
be designed to allow for future rearrangement of antennas upon the tower and to
accept antennas mounted at varying heights.)
5. The fence is to be constructed of either brick masonry walls or solid wood fencing
of a height of no less than six feet (section 154.119)
5ccj3
Resolution No. 12915
Monopole Tower - 3rd Ave. NW
February 28, 2006
Page 2
e
6. The buildings, fencing and landscaping shall be maintained.
7. All abandoned or unused towers and associated facilities shall be removed within
six months of cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is
approved by the Planning Commission. In the event that a tower is not removed
within six months of cessation of operations at a site, the tower and associated
facilities may be removed by the city and the costs of removal assessed against the
property.
8. The site plan must provide verification that the location of the tower is above the
100 year flood elevation.
9. Provide approved drawing before City Council meeting.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of February, 2006.
ATTEST:
GaryD. Plotz
City Administrator
Steven W. Cook
Mayor
e
e
5ccj3
Hutchinson City Center
e
111 Hassan Street SE
HUb-hl_, MN 55350-2522
320-S87-S151/Fu 320-2.34-4240
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February 22, 2006
TO:
Hutchinson City Council
FROM:
Hutchinson Planning Conunission
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE AND CONDmONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A
190 FOOT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 412 3RD AVE NW (NEW
DIMENSION PLATING)
Pursuant to Sections 154.119 and 154.066 of the City Code, the Hutchinson Planning COImnission is hereby submitting its findings of fact
and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit and variance.
mSTORY
The property owner and applicant are requesting a variance and conditional use permit for the construction of a 190 foot monopole
tower to be located on the rear lot of the New Dimension Plating property located on 3rd Ave NW. The setback requirement from the
east side is 95 feet and the tower is proposed to be located 55 feet from the east property line. The property is located in the I/C
atstrict requiring a conditional use permit The application received from Mark Hoppe, Blue Wing Company, was reviewed by Garrett
.ysiak, P.E., Owl Engineering, on January 26, 2006 (the city's consultant for tower review).
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and fees were submitteli
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchin.on Leader on February 9, 2006.
3. There were no neighboring property owners present at the public hearing objecting to the request.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend denial of the variance due to lack of hardship and approval of the
conditional use permit with the following conditions:
e
1. There is to be buffering on the rear of the property. The proposal would be for a 60 foot row of lilacs.
The Forester should have the final approval over specie type.
2. Liability Insurance coverage to cover damage to buildings/vehicles etc. on other properties.
3. The Airport Conunission must provide their recommendation.
4. The applicant is agreeing to co-location opportunities (Section 154.119 any proposed commercial
tower shall be designed. structurally, electronically and in all respects, to accommodate both the
applicant's antennas and comparable antennas for atleast two additional users if the tower is over
100feet in height or for at least one additional user if the tower is over 75 feet in height. Towers must
be designed to allow for future rearrangement of antennas upon the tower and to accept antennas
mounted at varying heights.)
5. The fence is to be constructed of either brick masonry walls or solid wood fencing of a height of no less
than six feet (section 154.119)
6. The buildings, fencing and landscaping shall be maintaineli
7. All abandoned or unused towers and associated facilities shall be removed within six months of
cessation of operations at the site unless a time extension is approved by the Planning Commission. In
the event that a tower is not removed within six months of cessation of operations at a site, the tower
and associated facilities may be removed by the city and the costs of removal assessed against the
- Primed 011 ftOC)'CIed paper -
56~d3
Planning Commission
~ding of Fact - February 22, 2006.
~nopole Tower - Blue Wing IDe.
Page 2
property.
8. The site plan must provide verification that the location of the tower is above the 100 year flood
elevation.
9. Provide approved drawing before City Council meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Dean Kirchoff; Chainnan
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Gus Wordell, 20455-2481h Cr.
Blue Wing Inc., Mark Hoppe, P.O. Box 16318, St. Paul MN 55116
e
e
S(c)j5
r#/-q/'W"~DIREcToRs/REpoRi~:~PLANNiNGDEPARTMENT-~~;"""'~
.7...,:,.-:..t':~;;~.'V.:AA<~:.>'hl';:a<""'/.Jr/,#/,4P'/.-m'/.<<'/A~:.I-~~~:;.;!'i'"/.M'7N/A!"7~:.ro'/~'/;4iI'/--tI"7...-.-:;!<f'/$/"".%&';lli~'::-':'",}~;"~""~~".,.1":;.,;.,,;'.#'"..p<r::;ji';:~""/P/p(.$.v,~4$""/""/~/~A":~:<I~{.;o/"""/~..r.'Y-"'J~'':'>--:~;~/",",''''/~':'.;''''?s.-/''''''/'''''/;'''~H7~4'r'''d!:".;@:~/#.~~~i
To:
Hutchinson Planning Commission
(Persons in attendance at Planning Staff Meeting (in bold) :
Brad Emans, Dolf Moon, Dave Hunstad, Miles Seppelt, Jessica Evans,
Judy Flemming, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, P.E., Kent Exner, John
Webster, John Olson, Lenny Rutledge, Kyle Dimler, Mark
Schnobrich, Marc Sebora, Gary Plotz, Ken Merrill, Jim Popp, Dan
Hatten, Dick Nagy, Julie Wischnack, AICP, and Bonnie Baumetz
From:
Date:
February 6, 2006 - Meeting Date: February 21,2006
Applicant:
Blue Wing Inc.
Gus Wurdell, Property Owner
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
Brief Description
The property owner and applicant are requesting a variance and conditional use permit
for the construction of a 190 foot monopole tower to be located on the rear lot ofthe New
Dimension Plating property located on 3rd Ave NW. The setback requirement from the
east side is 95 feet and the tower is proposed to be located 55 feet from the east property
line. The property is located in the IIC district requiring a conditional use permit. The
application received from Mark Hoppe, Blue Wing Company, was reviewed by Garrett
Lysiak, P.E., Owl Engineering, on January 26,2006 (the city's consultant for tower
review).
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zonbig:
IIC (Industrial Commercial)
Property Location:
3rd Ave NW
Lot Size:
Approximately 1.03 acres
Existing Land Use:
Industrial (New Dimension
Plating)
Adjacent Land Use
And Zoning:
Industrial
Comprehensive
Land Use Plan:
Business Park
Zoning History:
NA
Applicable
Regulations:
Sections 154.119 and 154.066 of the City Code
5L)3
Conditional USe Permit
Cell Tower on 3rd Ave NW
Planning Commission- February 21, 2006
Page 2
SPECIAL INFORMATION
Transportation:
3rd Ave NW
Parking:
N/A
Existing
Arborvitae
trees
Analysis and
Recommendation:
Staff would recommend to deny the variance for lack of hardship. The
hardship criteria are set forth below:
J 154.167 VARIANCES.
(A) Authority and conditions.
(I) The Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals,
is authorized to hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of this chapter in instances
where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated
that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as
used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a
reasonable use ifused under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner
is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if
granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic consideraiions alone shall
not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the
ordinance. Undue hardship also includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in
section 216C.06, subdivision 2, when in harmony with the ordinance. The Planning Commission
may not permit as a variance any use that is not permilled under the ordinance for property in the
zone where the affected person's land is located. The Planning commission may permit as a
variance the temporary use of a one family dwelling as a two family dwelling. The Planning
Commission may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect
adjacent propenies.
(2) The conditions cited as reason for granting a variance must be due to physical
conditions unique to the land 'or building involved and must not be applicable to other sites in the
same zoning district. Economic considerations may be taken into account but shall not by
themselves be the reason for which a variance is granted. Inadequate access to direct sunlight
where solar energy systems are used may be considered grounds for granting a variance.
5 {S-)5
e
e
e
Conditional Use Permit
Cell Tower on 3rd Ave NW
Planning Commission- February 21, 2006
Page 3
(3) Specific conditions and safeguards may be imposed upon thepremises
benefitted by a variance as considered necessary to prevent injurious effedS upon property in the
neighborlwod or upon pub& facilities and services. Vial4tion af tlwse conditions and safeguards
siuJlJ be a violation of this chapter.
If the applicant could locate an appropriate, conforming location for the tower, staff would
recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions:
Cc:
1. There is to be buffering on the rear of the property. The proposal
would be for a 60 foot row oflilacs. The Forester should have the
final approval over specie type.
2. Liability Insurance coverage to cover damage to buildings/vehicles
etc. on other properties.
3. The Airport Commission must provide their recommendation.
4. The applicant is agreeing to co-location opportunities (Section 154.119
any proposed commercial tower shall be designed, structurally, electronically and
in all respects, to accommodate both the applicant's antennas and comparable
antennas for at least two additiolUJi users if the tower is over 100 feet in height or
for at least one additiolUJi user if the tower is over 75 feet in height. Towers must be
designed to allow for future rearrangement of antennas upon the tower and to
accept antennas mounted at varying heights.)
5. The fence is to be constructed of either brick masonry walls or solid
wood fencing ofa height of no less than six feet (section 154.119)
6. The buildings, fencing and landscaping shall be maintained.
7. All abandoned or unused towers and associated facilities shall be
removed within six months of cessation of operations at the site
unless a time extension is approved by the Planning Commission. In
the event that a tower is not removed within six months of cessation
of operations at a site, the tower and associated facilities may be
removed by the city and the costs of removal assessed against the
property.
8. The site plan must provide verification that the location of the tower
is above the 100 year flood elevation.
Gus Wurdell, 20455-248th Cr.
Blue Wing Inc., Mark Hoppe, P.O. Box 16318, St Paul MN 55116
:X~
I
i !~iil!i~lfli'( I IIU-lt
I iT -~[ r 1 ~ ~~l' II
! ~ fUr. II ,jj1ljl!i!' '::.. i'I
i'f. I ;
. p!i . "!!j.. :1.... r
r i
. c~ t;p ill!1! .~I I I
h~
--:- i;l lijl!lJ. ,Iifl f ;
[. -
-.'; ....
I.c_ I i1;i;fIUI:ii I
~"I~
-- . h rd .! I i
ri;~
-I -
. ~ dU-iglf:~J -
. 'C +
' ~ U'!!!lliIIJi
I
\ I ~IJd e ..
\ .. 1I f I
\ I
...... ....,
."
::0
o
Gr g
. g:j
II d
I ~
I ~
I
i :r. I
i i ~~!1
;; I I, I
'3 ~.
\ ~ ~.I
I ~ P&
\ :0 \ ~ i~ I
\\ ~ \ ~ '\l
\\ p 1 l'Tl I
.. P. 1
\1 ~ i I
\~ ?: \ I Z I
: It '?. \ ~
I '-\ ~ \, I
\ \ ~ I)
~ ~\ Ii
~ ....._-~,
\ , I - _'4 --- I
\ \ I I
\ \ I I
\ \ . ! il
\ \ I I I
\ \ I \.toP I
I. I ,I :~~ J~
. - - -\- - - _.- - -\ - - - - - - - b=--=-=-_ T=-~-=--===..=r:='<)~.
I I ....."... ........ _oJ IV ~ {fJ
\ . \. . ""1I......T.lln....... .., .D
i \ \ ~ i I
\ \ C)
I
I
J
.
III
u!
II'
tlJ
i.
i
~
z
5
n
~
(5
Z
"TI
o
::0
lil'
c
I'T1
~
~
5(c}3
e
e
e
i.\
r
.
~
~
"
;' ~t"H:!
l.' .' ;, ~ .. :..
/': '. "'.,
I.' t ":!_::
i' " , '".
t ~ ,;"
~ f ;;~~
i }~. :,~::
, .-
~~~~
~ ~';
,
~. 1
i': 1
H~
,1 ~ :-
; l.:
~~~
~..:<,
:'~~
': ..~
. t.~
;:"
;
f
I
i
,\," ,
-~
\ . i"
\ i
. ~~.
".
'"
\\
, \
\
l~
~"
'-.
"
'''.
(
,
j .
I
\ "
\ ".
,
""
"
\
J... "
~~~
~~~j
4-
.~ ,
J <J ~X(Y ,'"'=",
'/ r;,J ~
.; 'q..
"
;I
i
~
~
.. ... -, ~
. :u:~~=;:,~~~ a
:~~!~\:~~i~i'; ~
'~~:~~~~f;~~:~; ~
Jx~'" "8~~)~p_... "
cO', '~[."~'~lll b
';:\"~'''''i'd~ ~
~:fi 4~j";~D"O",..';tl~ z
~;.... i ....!., n '. ~ oi~ .~ ~ ~
...."...~ ~-...,g...:...... ~
~ ;~~~~~iF~f:~~ g
~;~l~t~~i;l~~~ i
~~ ,.~<>..:tw~~":~q~;
<>...~i8fo'o_, .. ...
;::"":'~"~iiJl "'
~ "'Jt~~.'!:'" "'Ill -:;
~~:..~~;,~::~~~~~
"",,~. - i'~<F'
~"W:'~""~~j1:'''''~
~'''~'8~ ~.~;;
~~:~~r.;:~'l';:;~:~
""P';:~1'~.~ _
~"!".~8~.~t...... :!;=
W~l~~~ ~ .-
~:: '"
Hl-'.,..
~:Uq ;'.,
;~;_~ . I \
~~ ''"1"
.....- --- -_._-_.- ~
......, ,.. - ~ - ': ' '. - .
. ,":!"" _.---- , ~ ~.
,~ "
I' >
I
I
,
,
,
~ ,
i
l_ '
'"
~
~
t "
, ~
g. i
.~. :
"'.
I
~
I
I
-~---
-.-,
g'
lc
I
i
'I
:1
I,
II
"
I
\
...~ ...I....~ .........
.L.__
..._L
~'Jf'I "Z'8Q.t4
''''''',
(O~
I
" ~ "
i
II
I '.' ,
, I .'
~
I
I
"..,
- .
"'"
i
I~
':
,-
~~
:8
"
'1)
:JJ
o
'1)
o
VI
m
o
~
~
m
:JJ
(J)
=i
m
r
o
()
:t>
-l
(5
Z
"T1
o
:JJ
OJ
r
c
m
, ,
:IE
Z
Gl
I'
~i
",
393
\~
0'('\ ({f'.Cl.Q ~
\
\
\
e\
~\
\
\
\
- .~
00 ____-\
--- 9 I
rr-._n. w.'\='L
~.."-\ '
..~- ,
/g
~. w i\ \ g
~ ~"\ ~ I
.. ~ I
~ .;:: I
u ~
1'-.-1 w ,
.. I _~_I
;11; - o. -..
lofil-- -. - L...J
---
""-
.,
-3S'13 SSJ:lJ'l
l"~.
on
..
___ ;.~Gl--
~.
Z
\ I~J
I :)
t-\ . ;:i
\ ~;, ~
\ : ~
:~
':~
\ : ~
. ~
~;~ ??
T
\-.
&
:;
'"
'"
z
C.
d
::>
CD
on
N
'"
z
;::
on
X
w
\
\
\
\
,
\
\
\
I
\
I
~&
'"
...
\
\
i-
~\
~\
~\
~-
g 2 ~<<!
. ;;. - I ~
~ ~ ~g.f~=.~o~
-2 CD O!g__I.:!!..:
o~ 01 .c.:_ 'Ov:.z:....
\-. c:B::t__. -_010
! c: '0 -. ~.S.f") ... 0 o'~ z
... .S '0 .a i:.""!: en a: ,... u
g:J:~-08-~ON0"5g
o ;.~~ $..8 06-f o;!
;E.Q.c~",;o_~~o_
~ -3:E:2 (; . It') _ ~ (fI 0 z '0.
~ ';u~~u.;.;:;~~o"!!~
.. ~'Ot: ..;i.,:~w';cGJ~.5
0. (l')~~!;~U'I;~fEOl~
~ 1!~"l5:l;~~....~gD
- i::606Cg:~~oo
"2 00 c Z _~._ I __
2 e")o;;.""-"I:tog_.t;:
Ci . _ ~: ~ ". ~_... ;: ? ~ '?
.2 ~~'~.c_~c e..
0]_
.. .
.
c
z
\
\
c
.
h
~.. .
i!!5(c'J?:;>
::.~ M-
;.t~
.5l!'ll " .".'
~~i .
Page 1 of 1
Bonnie Baumetz
e From: John Olson
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 8:59 AM
To: Julie Wischnack
Cc: . Bonnie Baumetz
SubJect: Application for Conditional Use Pennit - Blue Wing (540 - 3rd Ave NW)
At their February 14, 2006 meeting, the Airport Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Pennit for installation
of a 190' monopole tower at 540 - 3rd Ave NW.
Commissioners reviewed the application only from the standpoint of the height and location of the monopole
tower. Airport Commissioners did not discuss any other paticulars of the proposed project, other that the physical
location and physical height of the tower as might relate to any potential interference wlt/;l the use of the airport or
the proposed seaplane base.
The Airport Commission did not see any significant issues with the tower's location as it relates to air traffic,
and passed a motion for me to infonn you of their findings. The motion was.rnade by Chuck Brill, seconded by
Joel Schwarze, with unanimous approval of a quoroum of members present.
e
e
2/16/2006
~
:5(C)3
~
,i..
!
i
(
lCllc25 oIoCCDSe 3ICl'l1lt
lCllc25 oIoCCDS e :mr1lT
lC1lc25ACCOS e 3IlQ'lIIt
75.25. Sop- BASE 2.711. ~
2~ "'"'" 2.25".
12.00. Ball Pro]ocllon
74.50. Ball QW
190.00 MOOOPOlE
IKY
PAOB:
i
~
.5Cc..)..3 .
.'
RECEIVED
JAN 1 8 2006
To Whom It May Concern:
e
c:ay of tiutCIW IICln
D8pt. of P. Z. & B
Northern PCS currently has one three-sector base station to provide service to the city of
Hutchinson. That base station is located on the east side of the city at 345 Michigan
Street, with the antennas mounted at 180 feet in the air. We have surpassed the point at
which one base station is adequate for the city of Hutchinson, based upon the number of
subscribers whom reside in Hutchinson, the amount of usage that our subscribers
generate on our existing Hutchinson site, and the number of coverage complaints that we
have received. Northern PCS is looking to improve coverage in the areas of Hutchinson
which lay on the west side of Minnesota Highway 15, with emphasis on in-building
coverage in the larger residential areas north and south of Minnesota Highway 7.
Northern PCS has looked into several options for improving coverage in the western half
of Hutchinson; and we believe that the location at 540 3rd Avenue, NW Hutchinson, MN
55350-1672 will best meet our coverage needs.
e
Key for Coverage Prediction Maps:
GREEN = excellent mobile (outdoor) coverage, good in-building"',
YELLOW and RED = good mobile (outdoor) coverage, marginal in-building-,
BLUE = good mobile (outdoor) coverage, poor in-building,
ORANGE = marginal mobile (outdoor) coverage, very poor-to-no in-building coverage
WHITE = typically no-coverage, but all surrounding sites may not be depicted on the
fringes of the maps
.these maps are generated with a propagation tool, which is used to give a ''prediction'' of
what coverage will result from different locations. While mobile (outdoor) coverage is
usually very accurate compared to the "predictions", there are many variables to take into
consideration when trying to predict in-building coverage. Even. though a structure may
fall within the "green" coverage area, there is still a chance that there may be poor in-
building coverage; and that is largely caused by the materials used to construct the
structure.
PREDICTION MAP ANALYSIS
Build to Suit: Fits very well into our network. This site provides excellent coverage to
the residential areas north and south of Highway 7. The coverage will extend nicely to
the west of town, and south towards the retail developments, and airport.
Water Tank (northwest Hutchinson): The water tank in the northwest area of
Hutchinson, would provide excellent service north of Highway 7, and west of
Hutchinson, but it is full with Midwest Wireless antennas. This location also falls off in
the residential area south of Highway 7, and would not improve our coverage in the retail
developments west of Highway 15.
Western Wireless Monopole: Too close to our existing Hutchinson site. The Western
Wireless monopole would waste a lot of signal overlapping our existing site. This site
will not provide adequate in-building coverage to the residential areas west of Highway
e
5(C-'p
.'
,
.'
15, north of Highway 7. This location would not extend our coverage far enough west,
e especially on Highway 7, and west of the city of Hutchinson.
American Tower (Cingular build-to-suit at 44.89544"N -94.413750W): Too far west.
This proposed site would not provide adequate signal to provide good in-building
coverage to the residential areas west of Highway 15, north and south of Highway 7.
Regards,
Shawn Kohout
Northern PCS
RF Engineering Manager
e
e
.5~~ ~.
Stcj3
~
56:~
.
5('03
~-
:Y03
OWL ENG,INEERING
.. ... .._.c,.c.;"".... ",.<":,_,,,,,",.,~ .,..,-,;....<.<.c '-':"'_;":''::'':''':.'''''',;'''''_.','_<.:.,':':_,:_ .;.-'.....
,.,.......,....:...'C,...:.:,.c ,",'__,:. ,....,........'._...........,7,...'.........."......._.___
'Me TESl1ABS' lNC~
" , ,,' . ' ,'. . "" ;,'" ","0 .' ','
. CONSOl_~i:AmNSEIIe---.._'fE$tWllllA~_'
.... .... . ":. '-"':;>'-':'>i;,:.c:,:"':""J,":'"'-' - ...... " ,"-;'-.: __ '-'_.'>\'__~":\: : ..-_.'.<.:.'....:-.'._-:.:.'.,...:....'..:.-:....... ,. :..,_-' :-,., .. -,-,-
MlllIIUt.i.lma ' .
58441~1:A\~""",.",
85f.......7......... aM...,.
800-7pt.1a3lt
City of Hutchinson
Planning and Zoning
111 Hassan Street NE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
January 26, 2006
Dear Ms. Julie Wischnack:
I have reviewed the application for a new communications tower submitted by
Gustav Wurdell for use by Northern pes. My review of the zoning ordinance shows that
the application is not complete. The following items were found to be missing:
e
1. Structural specifications signed by a Minnesota Professional Engineer.
2. Landscaping plans
3. Screening plans
4. Letter of intent for sharing offacility
5. Letter from Hutchinson Airport Commission
6. list of any towers or structures within one mile for potential co-Iocation
Additionally it should be noted that I found a discrepancy in the tower heights in the
submitted tower sketch and the application. The application requests a 190 foot
monopole. The tower sketch shows a tower height of 189 feet with the antenna elements
extending to 191 feet These tower heights are shown to be referenced to the base that
. appears to extend above ground. These parameters should be shown referenced above
ground level.
The property to the east of the tower is shown as a vacant lot and the proposed tower
is only 55 feet from the property line. If any buildings are considered on this property
they would likely be within the setback distance requirements of the ordinance.
e
-
5Cc..~
e
-
OWL EN
.,.....,-._;;_.:,,:-;-.'.f'i.~. ".""-"'_,\;',':'C- .,,','
_IS;," ,IHC,.
i;..>,,,_,:.,,,,,,~.,.,: :<','-. ,.,<.,',.'.;:,>:;-" -:"3'__~
. ~JJIj8cOM...UlftCArms'_~"~)'M~af lABlIftA'~l _.'
"'l!I7--1388
If I were requested to perform a detailed analysis of the proposal more information is '
need in order to complete a coverage study to demonstrate a need. Since there is now a
new standard for towers (EIA-222G adopted January, 2006)) that has added parameters
for monopole towers, the applicant should make sure that this proposal is in compliance
with this new standard.
If you have any questions in this matter please contact me.
Sincerely,
Jj~J1
Garrett G. Lysiak, P.E.
ycj3
Feb 01 O~ 09:"3a
e
e
e
Mark Hoppe
651-699-79....
p.1
BLUE WING
THIS FACSIMILE IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE
ADDRESSE ONLY.
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
DATE: OZ!OI!20<J6
TO: dJl'YlYlE RAI/IY} f~
(/TV J/ Nil TCHJ}'JIjJ/V -
FROM: Mark Hoppe
Blue Wing
P.O. Box 16318
StPaul, MN 55116
RE: 11 ppliO, T;;1I]/
PHONE: (UJ) 25if-Y-;to3
FACSIMilE: (32:J) 23 if- va lfO
PHONE: (651) 699-1985
FACSIMilE: (651) 699-7944
e-mail: mhoppeOi..!bluewil.lQ.com
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: r
MESSAGE:
m ), lIir II P1 F.T?:. )
PLt4SE SEE THE:: F~LL:YVvlJv3_
-7JrvF.R. ~t/tR.V:~fy w1hcH f:tO/)J?E'5SF-S
fJ1 /S S I M ~1E ms @ C!) C!) Ii rvO (!) #
- IlJJlJj7lJlVAl. <;:T4rf)nfrvT FJI?, VAt:!./Ant(f
AlfJUCA1/::JiV
- LEnfJ:?. FJ2:J/'YJ S7U1i!/YSyvOjO,
- 7J11l{;R () E5.Z61V
t.f:6A.RDHIh Z~ 1110 - SP:J*1: wlTJ1 .jJfiJy OL: S€-N ..
AW/:J Z1EI'hS ~'Vfl.L. 1Jt: /2E I//fwE-O /Jl/RIJv(i l'hILJ~F€~"!l~~Y'
A/~ p.Ji2.r h1[f':T . ..
,Eff J11 If) - <;T,l!.~.(.' Tl/l!.A.L wLl..'- Sf CY'J7PLE:TE "/11.0 fA.YetI
6 Y FJ!./lPI Y.
I /3fLIGf rH/j (" .)YJ1 pun:-S rill;, rre/J15/
9Ivcf;/f!..f:.L'I ./ .t" .". / /J .
/~/,/'~ Y/-1~
~
:Y0S
...._--.'j;(......
ilU'___"I--.:'_"'~
'-;.--.'Ir...n
_.--.----~._u
Feb 01 06 09:44a
Hark Hoppe
651-699-7944
e
e
e
Hutchinson, MN
General Plan
Blue Wing's plan is to construct a communications facility - tower and ground
facilities - that will allow co-Iocation of antennas for wireless service providers
such as cellular, PCS or wireless broadband. These service providers will
enhance the number and types of wireless services available to Plainview. Blue
Wing promotes, encourages and will accommodate the needs of various
wireless providers to co-locate and we have chosen a location that will minimize
the effect of the tower on the surrounding residences. In summary, the vision of
Blue Wing to promote the co-Iocating of wireless services is consistent with most
community goals of reducing the number of tower structures in the community
while providing advanced wireless services.
Site and Tower Location
The proposed tower would be located on the property of New Dimension Plating
at 540 3rt! Avenue NW. The tower would be located behind a currently existing
storage shed and next to large corrugated steel building of S1eamswood. This
location was chosen by Blue Wing to minimize the effect the tower would have
on the surrounding area as well as to provide a suitable wireless
communications location.
-. ...
I
! .
~-" '--.' ...........-.-.._'" ~..C.:.....l:lWL.::~. ',;:~_~",,,,.,~,,,-':~
!,. J.. .: -;' .......
to',
.-J
Search Ring - Sites within and outside a 1 mile search ring were reviewed.
There is one site located within the 1 miles search ring; the Hutchinson water
tower. Northern PCS contacts with the city indicated the water tower would no1
be able to accommodate additional carriers. There are no other towers or
structures appropriate for wireless collocation within the 1 mile search ring. As a
good faith effort and not required by Hutchinson's zoning regulation, additional
towers were revieWed and because of the locations of these towers, these
towers also failed to meet the coverage requirements. The tower reviewed were
Blue Wing, Inc.
1
1".2
5LC'p
~....t:_
z:J..'I.......'III;a:RI""~
~;.t:......,....I.II_ .... _'J"'iil'.I."."~''''l..n'
.-
Feb 01 06 09:44a
Mark Hoppe
651-699-7944
Hutchinson, MN
the Western Wireless tower and the, tower were reviewed outside the 1 mile
search ring and these sites did not meet The County Tower will not meet
structural loading required and, in addition, there is not adequate room at the
base of the tower for the carriers equipment. The Midwest Cellular tower is
outside the 1 miles radius and does not provide adequate coverage.
Site and Tower Plans
Site
The tower site will consist of a compound area of 60 by 75 feet fenced base
area, which is divided into areas to be used by the individual wireless users,
clients.
Fence and Screening
The fence would consist of a 6 foot
wooden fence. The fence would
consist of 6 foot vertical wood solid
board fence; board on board. If
desired, Blue Wing feels a wood
and corrugated steel fence would
be more appropriate and blend into
the area more effectively because
of the adjacent industrial buildings.
No landscaping is planned due to
the proximity of the tower to .
eXisting buildings. If desired, Blue Wing would provide a 60 foot row of lilacs set.
off 10 to 15 feet off the southern edge of the compound. Once mature; the lilac
would provide a visual barrier from the road to the south.
..... ~ ___ _.--.t.. _......~~._ . -.:~~.."~_.__.,, - .- - ,. .._.._...__.......... ,,_; .1.'1 ..:;, ""~ 'Ol::,.:--::::O-.....
Wireless Shelters
The wireless providers generally provide either a prefabricated concrete building,
approximately 12 feet wide by16 feet long, or equipment cabinets at the base of
the tower to shelter the wireless equipment. The trend is to use cabinets as
opposed to buildings, but both are currently used as wireless shelters.
Tower
The proposed tower would be a 190 ft monopole tower. The tower would be built
to ANSI\EIA-TIA-222-G standards. The tower would be lighted per FAA
requirements, but based on initial study, no lighting would be required.
The tower would be designed to accommodate up to 5 carriers with antenna's
located between 190 and 150 feet.
Blue Wing, Inc.
2
p.3
~~,
~.~.
...::I"f~.J'lIt~"'.t."
~...t......
____1___ ..
F!!b 01 06 09:44a
Hark Hopp!!
651-699-7944
e
e
e
Hutchinson, MN
Interference
All wireless service providers using the Blue Wing communications facility must
adhere to the Federal Communications Commission radio frequency transmitter
signals standards which insure non-interference of other wireless services
including private telecommunications, radio broadcast. television broadcast and
public safety. Blue Wing will ensure that all service providers who cannot
guarantee that their radio frequency transmitter signals will not interfere with local
private telecommunications, radio broadcast, television broadcast and public
safety will not be allowed on the tower.
Co-location
Blue Wing guarantees that it will permit shared use of the tower at market rates
to all wireless operators who wish to operate on the tower Eligible operators
most operate within governmental guidelines as well as practice safe and proper
installation and construction practices.
Blue Wing, Inc.
3
1".4
5Lc$
:11120...........
I:].........u~a".,~
iiirot;.-.'\iF.1i...
Feb 01 06 09:44a
Hark Hoppe
......o.:lI.IiI!lM<<._
651-S99-?944
S51-S99-7944
320'S8'737:52
Jan 18 OS 01:38p Mark Hoppe
DEe-l4-as WED 82:47 ~M ~&LLtNEH LAND 5VRY~VIN~
e !MIKU AVt..l\lUC. I\JVV
Eo,1 264.00
--.
EXISTING BUILDING
e
I
I
I
I
I
h,
I " ,
, /
I ~
I ;
I ::
'"
~ ~
WAREHOUSE
Z~
BO -,
'1 ~'1l-x-6Q.1x~ -1'..
(I r. n I
I Ix I" I
t 1 ~ 1 I
I 1 i l :
81 ~l TC:ER '15l
I I I I
, XtCl'OIJND EltCL05IIItE i I
I ?< I" 10 I
10 .60 - I
I L -.-.-X-I( I
!~UMITS I
r '
1
[XL 1\ C '5
..-..... ..
. .
...,
!
I
z:)
p.l
P..81
-...,." ---.
<t-
g
N
=
~
o
l/I
-,-'
p.5
..--'
~
5(c~
Feb 01 06 09:....a
e
e
e
Mark Hoppe
January 25. 2006
P.O. Box 16318
Sl Paul. MN 55116
Su~ject: Co-location Letter
To whom it may concern:
HutChinson, MN
651-699-79....
p.6
Blue Wing guarantees that it will pennit shared use of the tower at market rates
to all wireless operators who wish to operate on the tower Eligible operators
most operate within governmental guidelines as well as practice safe and proper
installation and construction practices.
Sincerely I
~?1~
~.:;.. ./-2r
Blue Wing
Blue Wing, Inc.
4
!;Lc:i3
Feb 01 06 09:~5a
Hark Hoppe
651-699-?9~~
e
e
e
Variance Application-
18. Currently, the parcel of land is occupied by New Dimension Plating. The
reason for the request for the variance is unique nature of the placement of the
existing building in regards to the tower location. A variance would enable best
use of the property without impacting the intent of the tower zoning code. The
tower code currently requires 1 foot of setback for each 2 feet of tower.
Therefore, the proposed tower of 180 feet would require a 95 foot setback. The
variance request is for the setback of the tower from the property line to be
setback 55 feet from the property line instead of 95 feet. The adjoining property
owner to the East, Steamswood, which is the only property effected by the
variance, (see attached letter) indicate that they do not oppose the granting of
the variance. In addition. the variance would allow New Dimension Plating
greater flexibility in expanding there existing building as needed. Also, the
variance would no impact on the visual impact of the tower and would in most
cases provided better visual shielding of the base of the tower.
19. The hardship incurred would be the compromising the best use of the
property and potentially impacting the expansion ability of New Dimension
Plating. The intent of the tower zoning code would be met without impacting
surrounding land owners and achieving the best use of the existing property.
p.?
5~
-.-....-.....
-
..
Feb 01 06 09:45a Mark Hoppe
JAN-27-06 FRI 12:07 PM
651-699-7944
FAX tIl.
,..8
P. 01
e
,r~' :'~' ..\./.;,
1'. . ,. ~, r
~~ -"~.
_.tol.. :.
~,nc.320TNn:I_~NW"P.O.!ICIllllO.~. ~~
lelep~ 6121587-2137 Fex 61211l87.1846
~ 811d P,odI.L:lion 0/ HlgIl Pafor/llll1tXO ~ In Wood Ifl(I TripI! W.R
~ Ill8Z
To whom it mny concern:
e
Mr. Wucdcll and I have ta1Jccd about Blue Wing', plans to cOllstTUCla lower on tl1c
adjacent property next to Stcamswood. Wc realize that tower wiD DOt meet \be :;etbllCk' s
required in the lowcr orlliwmec, bulllrc comfortable with the tower placcmclll.
TherefotC, we do not object to the lOwer projcc;t moving forward.
Any qucstions for StrcalUwood CII1l be directed 10 Corey.
Sincerely,
Ca--r~-
Corey T. Steams
e
5~
Feb 01 06 09:45a
Mark Hoppe
'-"'11
.12AI;l:(SS.lq1llr3CXT
651-tl99-?944
p.9
c.
IOo25ACCESS 0 3IlI1111'
OIIZl_02'Q"1O'
101125 _0__
7300" Scr lASE 2.75'_
20 _ 2.25".
1200'101I_
74.7$' 8011 ano.
ESTItolATED SlRUCllJRE WElGHT- 42.1 Kips
BLUE WING. INe.
Sabre Hutchinson. t.lN
~
190.00 ~ONOPOLE
QY
a::r-lM!f'llau.....:.
ill.I"IA~"'."1O - ~
....-.........
...._.1_.... _I.r
651-699-7944
p.1
Feb 03 06 09:13a, Mark Hoppe
e
e
e
. :.
BLUE WING
-ce~
r:f8 0
~' 32006
D8Pt~~
THIS FACSIMilE IS CONFIDENTIAL AND IS INTENDED FOR USE BY THE
ADDRESSE ONLY.
FACSIMilE COVER SHEET
DATE: ,~/.JlI/;).rKJ C,
TO: BJrvlVlfIJAlJfYlf-T~
CITY Of H(/7CH/lYSJh! . ,
FROM: Mark Hoppe
Blue Wing
P.O. Box 16318
Sl Paul. MN 55116
RE: T'JJ1vERPE.Ri11lT$ ~ fl1/55 liltS ZrC:TJ1
PHONE: (~l..)) 2~~-lf:JJ3
FACSIMilE: (32J) 73</.-l{~ $tO
PHONE: (651) 699-1985
FACSIMilE: (651) 699-7944
e-mail: mhoooe(a)bluewinQ.com
o
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 1/
MESSAGE:
/J1). Eli /I i'Y) EiT:
J
PL( A 'Sf. S E€ !>c.rrA(/.-1fD, E fj( UFl/f- TH/5
(3m PlCffS AlL. 7Rf h,IS5/Jr6 Tifrt?'5. PU:A5f
('Jf1/1ACT fJ1 ExF y,,,, FE:fL rl1C:JzE J7110~ Jl)r5,/--rh/JJrv~ ~Tr:l1-6.
5lIVc fl2.E L."\~
~ PI A--
yY'Il\ p., ~ A. 1-1 J l' P'6
'-
~
.5(c~
::I~w.u.t.'"
:EliW.,~...m~.a,~~
Feb 03 06 09:13a
e
Hark Hoppe
;&t_"iF.1i.ltll
.....,_IIHMIlIIA.'IQH
C i~I?~..
651-S99-7944
1".2
Structural Design Report
190' Monopole
located at: Hutchinson, MN
prepared for: BLUE WING, INC.
by: Sabre Communications Corporation TM
Job Number: 06-02018
February 2, 2006
Monopole Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
e Pole Calculation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. C1..ca
e
Prepared by
Checked by
Approved by
?PS
~
.
PAOFFSSIONAl ENGIN~ER
I hlreby certlly \haIlNs plan.1ptl II.... ..
or MparI was Pf1lPlU1ld by me or undIr flI'/
cIncl cupervislon and thaI I IUI'l . duI1
u:.n.d PtoIeaslonaI Engin~ undlr ..
_.......~
P"~~ J
:::~~ ~,~
.
.
5~
-...-.,----.
..,.....I..___~ . O;::K
;;rol=-o,"-',...1iI
______;&IUlllliiIU.."\IW
Feb 03 06 09:13a
Hark Hoppe
Ill' ... "'.... PI_ (I)
.'ZACUSSelQ'tlll'D1
KltZ3MXD5e_
1OI~ IoCCUS e 21l( tIT
11Iaz:l_eJlll'1IO'
13.00" s.- US[ 2.15' llIlcO
2Il _2.25',
12.00' 801. ProjodIoo
1..7S' 8011 CWdt
651-899-79"'4
p.3
- -
Z.2S Z. ~
') FlU HEaty STEP la..15
~ _ FEED Ul[$ _ _ PCU
PROFESSIONAl FNGINEER
I hefeby certIy that ftls plan, IfA .. J ..
or report_ pnlpINd by me or t.nIIr...
dlrec:l supervision and that I am a *It
LIo&nsed ProIessIonal Engw- '"* ..
t.ws of !he Sl8Ie 01 Min
Prtnt N8me lTH TINOAU.
WING, INC.
Hutchinson, MN
190.00 MONOPOLE
IICV
~......... DllAtIIC
RfII
~
5(~
e
e
e
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutcbin8on, MN SS3S0-2522
320-587 .SISl1Fax 320-234-4240
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 15, 2006
TO: City Council
FROM: Bonnie Baumetz, Planning Coordinator
SUBJECT: Appointment to Joint Planning Board
It is time again to appoint a City representative to the Joint Planning Board for 2006. Bill
Arndt has indicated an interest in remaining on the Joint Planning Board. Bill has been on
the Board since its beginning in 1997 and is the Chairman of the group. The term for Joint
Planning Board members is an annual appointment with a 10 year limit.
- Printed OIl recy<:1ed paper -
5(d)
FORM A.F. 3 - Clerk's Posted Notice
MillerlDavisCo.. St. Paul. MN
ASSESSMENT NOTICE
of
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, That the Board of Appeal - *Equalization ofthe
\\\e..-l~
(-'~t;~~-~yJ
County,
Minnesota, will meet at the Office of the Clerk in said t~~
at L\~?V o'c1ock-B-M., on --(h'-L("~ the~daYOf \f\~
o ' ~
for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said U':ht
for the year, dtf'tjAII persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment, or who wish to
Year
complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting,
,3oot,o
Year
and show cause of having such assessment corrected.
No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed,
or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint.
Given under my hand this
;)3t1
day of
~h~ Uo.A U
~
,300(p
Year
()(U~1J. Plci?-.
~
Clerk of the ti..'\j
~ ' ~ \
of 4etu '{6['lY\
e'
'Applies only in Cities whose charters provide for a Board of Equalization.
WARNING, UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF THIS FORM PROHIBITED - (GENUINE_D" PRINTED FORMS HAVE A BlUE BORDER I
y+)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
444 Cedar St., Suite 133, St. Paul MN 55101-5133
(651) 296-6439 ITY (651) 282-6555
www.dps.state.mn.uslalcgamblalcgamb.html
RENEWAL OF CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY PERMIT
Permit Fee $250 (Renewal Date: April 1)
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
PUBLIC
Little Crow Bowling Lanes Inc.
HU.tch Bowl
1150 Hwy 7 W/Box 203
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Worker's Comp Ins. Co Cen-h 'ttf.n.fo..{ W epOliCY No ~57 '6075-;). Policy Period 7/I,Ic'5 - 1 If fbl.
IY\ c- LeD d
Permit Name: L;+\--Ie., Cnw (jOy.] II (\.0, Lw€.-s
Trade Name: d4(.L+1J.. ~vJl J
115D 4-+wj 1 W , Po I?>ox ;t)3
City, State, ZIP Code: cpk.M (rls070 ()1 N 55350
City/County where permit Approved:
Location address:
Business Phone:
By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership, corporate officers,
bylaws, membership, partners, home addresses, or telephone numbers. If changes have occurred during the past 12
months, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
Applicant's siwutture on this reoewal cooflnn<; the followin2: Failure to report any of the folIowin2 will result in fines.
1. Applicant confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of
Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
2. Applicant confirms that for the past five year it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation
(state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
3. Applicant confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal
liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, p\@ase give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below.
4. Applicant confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period.
5. Applicant confirms, no club on-sale intoxi ting liquor e IS held
6. Applicant confirms business premis r;?:'te ~ther business establishment.
Applicants Signature Date d . 8 - 0 tP
(Signature certifies all above information to be correct and permit has been approved by city/county.)
City Clerk/County Auditor Date
(Signature certifies that a consumption and display permit has been approved by the city/county as stated above.)
PS09097 (01100)
I Amount Received
i
5~)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION
444 Cedar St./Suite 100L
St. Paul, MN 55101-2156
(612)296-6439 TDD (612)282-6555
~
APPLICA nON AND PERMIT
FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
5535D
Location
area, ~ '
'fnt.Ud N1/17~ FtUfffjl.ldYiJ
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the Liquor license providing the service.
!I/o
Will the applicant cany liquor liability insurance? If so, the car;tl' ~ name and amount of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory) --r l1\u,fnAt!'" I/j(V~
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITI1NG TO LIQUOR CONTROL
CITY/COUNTY
DATE APPROVED
CITY FEE AMOUNT
LICENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
SIGNATURE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OffiCIAL
APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR
NOTE: Do not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the oriJinal signed by thiI division
will be returned as the Iiceme. Submit to the City or CoUnty at least 30 day. before the event.
1'8-09079(8195)
Slh)
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION
444 Cedar St./Suite I DOL
St. Paul, MN 55101-2156
(612)296-6439 TDD (612)282-6555
e
APPLlCA nON AND PERMIT
FOR A 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
LocatIon
Will the applicant contract for intoxicating liquor services? If so, give the name and address of the Liquoc license providing the service.
;y'D
Will the applicant carry liquor liability insmance? If so, the I!J:f s name and amount of coverage.
(NOTE: Insurance is not mandatory) '1:7' Uli'/1"f1t'e d tffS
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNlY BEFORE SUBMfITING TO LIQUOR CONTROL
CITY/COUNTY
CITY FEE AMOUNT
DATEFEEPAID
SIGNATIJRE CITY CLERK OR COUNTY OFFICIAL
DATE APPROVED
LICENSE DATES
APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR
NOTE: Do not separate these two pam, _d both parts to tbe address above and the oriplaIslped by tbis dhisioB
will be returned as tbe license. Submit to the City or COUIlty at least 30 days before tile eveat.
PS-09079(8I9S)
5'0
e
e
~~ ~ ~ ~~
e
Date Received:
Pennit Fee: $25 (short term)
III Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(320) 587-515 lfFax: (320) 234-4240
City of Hutchinson
APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT
All applications must be received at least 30 days before event in order to be considered
anizationInformation
~~ ql...
C1, gamzatlon Name
~S ~~ ~~.f
Or anization Address
Sg-1- ~I..tlt !;
Phone Number
-~
Ci
~
State
5 S3Sc)
Zi
5<(,1-~'?~~
Phone Number
Officer Name
\\\0 \~ 1~
~JW.d~
Parade Chairman Name
\~
City
~ $$350
State Zip
Phone Number
III () \~ J f-
Residenc~ddress
I~~
Ci State
SS'3So
Zi
Parade Information
Parade Date: 'I'Y\ o....c.... ~ I
~
Location and Description of Assembly Area:
Starting Time of Parade:
Starting Point of Parade:
Route of Parade Travel:
Assembly Time: ~.; 0 0
MC~ ~~ 0_ ,,~
~ ~ 1(: ~ S Estimated Time of Parade: 3:. 0 ~
roL~CY~~
\ -4 (J.-vQ ~. . ~i c..M ~
Ending Point of Parade: ~~.I'~-"" ~ ~~ qu
Approximate Number of Units, Animals, and Vehicles w ich will constitute Parade: ~ S
Type and Description of A!lIllJ1alt" and Vehicles: ~ ~ ~ '\~
~
Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units:
"?
.so'
Maximum Length of Parade:
Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade:
Portion of Street Width Traversed:
k)~
~\I1
MPH
5G)
City of Hutchinson
Applicationfor Parade Pennil
Page 2 of2
e
e
e
Checklist
The following items need to be completed and/or attached in order for the application to be processed:
Permit fee paid in full (check or money order): 0 yes 0 no
Permit Aoolication comoleted in full and signed: 0 yes 0 no
I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to
investigate the information submitted.
;7- I G ' 6 L
Date
Internal Use Onlv
Police 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
City Council 0 approved 0 denied Notes:
50)
~
~<>\~
~~
Permit Fee: $25 (short term)
e
Date Received:
III HasSlll Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(320) 587-5151/Fax: (320) 234-4240
City of Hutchinson
APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT
All applications must be received at least 30 dayS before event in order to be considered
Or tion Information
~ ~. ~vJq4
.....:l Or~ion Name
~5 ~ ~'S.~
Or anization Address
-\~
Ci
s ~") -.::t k I...:;;
Phone Number
'\'YL.,
State
Officer Name
~\10\~
~~ ~dress
Parade Chairman Name
S ~1-;)' ~81S'"
Phone Number
-~
City
~
State
5$3.5 0
Zip
I Jib
~')f'
Reside'lf&e Address
-~
Ci
5'&1 . ~ S~~
Phone Number
e
~
State
5S35::J
Zi
Parade Information
ParadeDate:H'\~ ~ Cf I aOO<.t . A~mblyTime: (~~J~ ~
LocationandDescription;;rAsSemblyArea: ~ ~ ~ __ ~\k:O
Starting Time of Parade: ~ ~stimated Tim~ of Parade: 3n~
Starting Point of Parade: _~ ~ l~ ~
Route of Parade Travel:fr, ' It .." ~..jl ~\-=1 l~ ~ 1\cJf:o
)JD l'o/ ~ ~ ~ ::b1_ _ L2~ ~ ~
Ending Point of Parade: ')'y) "- k.cS) ()~........... ~ c,y
Approximate Number of Units, Animals, and Vehicles which will constitute Parade: :3 (J
Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles: ~ ~t ~\A.. , ~ ~ ~
Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units:
?
50'
Maximum Length of Parade:
~w~
f~~
MPH
e
Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade:
Portion of Street Width Traversed:
:5 G)
e
e
e
City of Hutchinson
Application for Parade Permit
Page 2 of 2
Checklist
The following items need to be completed and/or attached in order for the application to be processed:
Permit fee paid in full (check or money order): I:] yes I:] no
Permit Application completed in full and signed: I:] yes I:] no
I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to
investigate the information submitted.
Q/
;:?-- /C ~
Date
uG
Internal Use Only
Police I:l approved I:] denied Notes:
City Council I:] approved I:] denied Notes:
5G)
e
e
e
,j"""
e,; .}~.
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
Kent Exner, City Engineer
Randy DeVries, Director of W ater/W astewater Operations
RE: Consideration of Improvement Project Change Orders
DATE: February 22, 2006
As construction has proceeded on the project referenced below there has been a need for a project scope revision. The
following Change Order is proposed to address this item:
. Change Order No.1 - Letting No. lllProject No. 05-13 - WTP Biologieal Treatment (Vessel material
reduction) - During the formal Water Treatment Plant design it was determined that the pressure vessels
containing the biological treatment could be downsized from the original 125 psi to 75 psi capacity without
impacting the operations of the new WTP. Thus, there is a savings in the materials needed to fabricate the
seven vessels that is incurred by the Contractor. Total construction cost decrease is $3 ],500.00.
We recommend that the above Change Order be approved in the amount Usted.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
SLY)
CHANGE ORDER~O.1<
. CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEE.~.I.NGDE~"R.~'1"
111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612J 234-42de ShMt1ofc1
IJNTRACTOR: Innlco Degremont Letting No. 11 Iproject No. 05-13
8007 Discovery Drive, Richmond VA 23229-8605 Project Location: Water Treatment Plant
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: During the fonnal Water Treatment Plent design it was determined
hat the pressure vessels containing the biological treatment could be downsized from the original
125 psi to 75 psi capacity. Thus, there is a savings in the materials needed to fabricate the seven
vessels. Dated: 09/6/2005
Item No. Spec. Ref. Item Name I Unit II Quantity II Unit Price II Amount I
INCREASE ITEMS:
TOTAL INCREASE ITEMS $0.00
DECREASE ITEMS:
Biological Treatment VeSsel Downsizing Each 7 ($4,500.00) ($31,500.00)
.
TOTAL DECREASE ITEMS ($31,500.00)
NET DECREASE ($31,500.00)
In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be decreased in the amount of 531.500 . An
extension of -4- days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date shall not be changed.
I
ORIGINAL CONTRACT .. PREVIOUS THIS DEDUCTION TOTAL
.... .... AMOUNT ADDlTIONSlDEDUCTlONS
. . .
$1,273,7215.00 $0.00 ($31,500.00) $1,242.2215.00
APPROVED: APPROVED:
Contractor Mayor
DATED: DATED: 02128/2006
PPROVED: APPROVED:
.
Director of Engineering City Administrator
DATED: 0212812006 DATED: 02l2B/2006
5~
e
e
e
':""'- .-"r,
-":- ~-
{ ~,
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
Kent Exner, City Engineer
RE: Consideration of Consulting Contract with Bolton & Menk, Inc. for Construction
Staking Services on Hwy 7
DATE: February 22, 2006
Per the TH 7 Central Cooperative Agreement with Mn/DOT, the City is responsible for the administering the
necessary construction staking to construct the City-funded utility improvements within this project. Bolton &
Menk, Inc., Mn/DOT's project design consultant., has submitted a very competitive proposal to provide these
construction staking services. Bolton & Menk is very familiar with the project and capable of efficiently
completing the necessary staking.
Attached is the proposal provided by Bolton & Menk for completing construction staking on an as-needed
basis. The cost of providing the construction staking for the easterly portion of the project is estimated to be
$13,500. Depending on future workloads, City Engineering staff may address some of the staking needs in the
fall of 2006 and/or 2007. The costs of these services are accounted for within improvement project budgets
and estimated fees.
We recommend executing the consulting coDtract with Bolton & Menk, IDe.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
5(\)
~~
e
e
SC::>LTON & IVIENK, INC.
Consulting Engineers & SUrveyors
1960 Premier Drive · Mankato, MN 56001-5900
Phone (507) 625-4171 · FAX (507) 625-4177
February 20, 2006
Attn: Kent Exner
Hutchinson City Engineer
111 Hassan St. E
Hutchinson. MN 55350
Re: TH 7 Improvements
Dear Kent:
Per your request I have prepared a revised scope of services and budget for the constroction staking
services for the proposed Trunk Highway 7 improvement though Hutchinson.
Bolton & Mcnk. Inc. puts a high priority on ensuring ~ our company's efforts are consistent with our
clients needs. Please review the attached documents and contact me if this proposal does not meet your
expectations. (This document will be mailed and emailed to you today.)
If you accept all the terms defined on the attached pages please fax me a signed and dated copy of this
document.
1:ISNAN"GIN'IlOPOSALSICONSTUC11ON STAICJN<I\2OO5'IlINSON TH 7 1lIlV.DOC
MANKATO, MN . FAIR MONT. MN . SlEEPV EYE. MN . BURNSVILLE. wtJ . WILlMAR. MN . CHASKA. MN . AMES. IA
WWW.boIIorH.r1erIc.com
An Equal 0ppcxtunJty Ernp/0y6r
Signature
Date
Sincerely,
Q::-~~
Janele Fowlds, L.S.
Cc: Brett Beozkofer. BMI
Enclosures:
Scope ofServkes and Budget (1 page)
TennsofProposal (I page)
Fee Schedule (I page)
:)(0
e
e
e
. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND BUDGET FOR CONSTRUcnON STAKING SERVICES
aleRt: Oty ofB.tebtJl8OD
Project: Tn 7 Improvements
Page 1
DESCRlPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Improvements OD the east end ofMNDOT Project No. 4302-44 (T.H. 7) to
T.H.15
SCOPE OF WORK
Bolton and Menlc, Inc. (BMI) will complete the following scope of work:
. Watermain Staking (5 trips to site - SO hours allotted)
o Set one set of stakes indicating the offset positioning for watermain at 100' increments
o Set one set of stakes indicating the stnJctures, services and hydrants for the watermain
. Sanitary Sewer Staking (5 trips to site - SO hours allotted)
o Set one set of stakes indicating the offset positioning for sanitary sewer at 100'
increments
o Set one set of s1akes indicating the structures and 8Cl'Vices for the sanitBIy sewer
ASSUMPTIONS
This proposal is based upon the following assumptions:
A. Bolton & Menlc, Inc. budgeted time for the field crew to make 10 trips (100 hours) to the job
site for the above defined construction staking. It is expected that the field cmv will. have a
full days work on the project (10 hours per day-including travel time) for each staking
request.
B. Bolton & Menk. Tnc. budgeted 12 hours ofan office survey technician's time to prepare the
staking dIawings and budgeted 7 hours for supervisionlproject management time.
C. Staking is proposed on a "one time" basis. Other contractors and subcontractors are to protect
all stakes until the staked facility bas been completed and the s1ake is no longer required.
Control points shall be protected throughout the project Any replacing of lost or obliterated
stakes will be considered re-ataking and billed in accordance with Bolton & Menlc, Inc.'s
standard schedule of fees.
~
The fees to provide the above work: will be billed hourly, in accordance with Bolton & Meolc, Inc.'s
standard schedule of fees, with the total estimated cosa of: $13,500.00
Additional Services will be provided on an hourly basis in accordance Bolton & Menk, Ine. 's standard
schedule of fees.
SCHEDULE
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 's scheduling policy is that we will make every attempt to have a survey crew OD site
within 2 working days of a construction-staking request.
5L \)
e
e
e
Version] 1-30-981CS
Terms of Construction Staking Proposal
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
This accompanying Proposal (hereinafter referred to as "Proposal") Is sabject to the following terms and
condition. These Terms of Proposal (hereinafter referred to as "Terms") are an Integral part of the ProposaIBS
If stated dlrectly therein. No change or deviation trom these Terms will be binding wItltout the wrItteB approval
of Bolton & Menk, IDe. (BMI). S.cJa changes may require an adjustmmt In the proposed fee, sehedllle or scope of
Proposal
A. Services: BMI proposes to perform the services outlined in the Proposal for the stated fee arrangement Restaking.
verification of plans prepared by others and cbaDges required by the Client or other controlling entities (regulatory
agencies, contractors, subcontractors, etc.) from tJ1e scope or schedule of services described in the Proposal shall be
considered "Additional Services" and wiD be invoiced on an hourly basis in addition to the stated fee arrangement
.B. Information from ClIent: Unless otherwise stated, Client agrees to provide BMI with all site information necessary
to complete the proposed services. This information includes current site property descriptions (from abstract, lido
opinion or title commitment) and other legal documents affecting site; a complete set of the project construction plans;
copies of previous surveys. maps. engineering studies and plans; existing or required soils and geotechnical reports;
govemmental, regulatory and utility reviews and determinatioos; and all other pertinent information. BMI is entitled to
rely upon the accuracy of the construction plans and accepts no responsibility for lDIdetected errors in plans prepared by
others. Client shall promptly inform BMI of any alleged defects in services provided by BMI.
C. Access to SIte: Unless otherwise stated, Client agrees to provide BMI with access to the site, including adjoining
properties, for activities necessary for the performance of services. It is understood that in the normal coUIlle of work,
property damage may occur due to excavations, tree and brush trimming, marldng lines, etc. The cost to correct
resu1ting damages has not been included in the fee. BMI will take precautions to minimi?... damage due to these
activities and the Client agrees to reimburse BMI for any costs associated with required restoration work.
D. Standard of Care: Professional services provided under this ~ wiD be conducted in a IDlRIIleI' consistent
with that level of care and skill ordinsriIy exercised by members of BMI's profession currently practicing under similar
conditions. BMI makes no expressed or ImpUed warnmty with resped to Its lIltderfakings desaibed henIa.
J:. Certifications: Any certification provided by BMI is a professional opinion based upon knowledge, information
and beliefS available to BMI at the time of certification. Such certifications are not jptended as and sball not be
construed as a guarantee or warranty. BMI shaD not be required to ccrtiJy the existence of conditions whose existence
BMI cannot reasonably ascertain.
F. CoD8fnldion SupervlaloD: This Proposal assumes that the Client will TnBintRi" supervisory personnel for the
control of the project. Oient's supervisory persomel shall be empowered to authorize stalcing and additional services.
aicnt is responsible for providing coordination of an staking requests from owner, other contractors, subcoDtractoaJ,
architects, elc. and any interpretation 0{ plans, conflicts, dimensions, and other unresolved construction matters required
for completion ofstaking services. Oient shall promptly advise BMI of any add...."'.""', change orders, field changes,
shop drawings or other documents affecting the location of improvements to be staked. BMI shall not be responsible
for the DlC8II8, methods, techniques or procedures of construction selected by any contractor employed on the project
nor for the safety precautions or programs incident to the work of any contractor.
G. OwnenbJp and Alteration of Deeumeaa: All documents, including repmts, specifications, drawings, field data,
notes and documents or electrooic media prepared or furnished by BMI under this agreement shall remain the property
ofBMI. The Client may make and retain copies for its use in connection with this project. However, such documeots
are not intended for reuse by the Oient on any other project or alteration of the project by others without the written
consent ofBMl Electronic media maybe furnished for convenience ofClieot; bowever, only signed and certified hard
copies of submittals may be relied upon as documentation of professional services provided.
Page I of2 - Terms of Proposal
:j\)
e
e
e
Terms of Construction Staking Proposal
Bolton & Men)[, Ine.
(Continued)
H. Billings and Payments: Invoices for BMI's services shall be submitted, at BMI's option, either monthly or upon
completion of such services. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days after the invoice date. If the invoice is not
paid within 30 days, BMI may, without waiving any claim or right against the Client, and without liability whatsoever to
the Client, terminate the performance of its services.
L Late Payments: Accounts unpaid 30 days after the invoice date win be subject to a monthly service charge of 18%
on the unpaid balance. If any portion or all of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing. the Client shall pay all
costs of conection, including reasonable attorney's fees.
S. LIen Waiven: Upon request, BMI will provide lien waivers on industry standard forms for payments received.
lien waivers will not be issued in advance of receipt of payment or for balances owed.
K. Termination of Sentces: 1be Qient may terminate this agreement or 8MI should the other fail to perfonn its
obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, the Client shall pay 8MI for services rendered to the date of
tennination, all reimbmsable expenses, and reimbursable termination expenses.
L. Certificates of InsUI'ance: 8MI will maintain, at its expense, statutory worker's compensation insurance coverage
and such geoeral IiabiliW insw1mce coverage for claims arising for bodily injwy, death or property damage which may
arise from the negligent performance by BMI or its employees of its general business activities, including automobile
use, and exclusive of any professional services included in the Proposal 8MI wil1, upon request, furnish Certificates of
Insurance documenting terms of coverages. . 8MI will not be required to extend coverages beyond those, which are
usual and custolllllI)' for similar finns practicing construction staking unless it is reimbursed for additional premium
expenses.
M. Limlfation of Llabllty: In recognition of the relative risks, rewardJ 8Dd benefits of the project to botla tke
CIIeIlt.RIId BMI. tile risks kave been aBoeated such that the Client agreet that, to tile fullest extent permitted by
law, BMI's totalllabBlty to the eue.t for uy and aD injuries, dabm, Ieaes, 9peRSeS, damages or cla1naed
expenses arising out of the perfomguce of tIWl agreement ftom any CIluse or ca_. sItaIlllOt exceed
$ 13.5ot.OO . Such claims ladude, but are not Umited to, BMI's UeIHgeAce, erron, om1nioas, IItrlct liabllty,
breach of coJrtract, or breacll of WIlITllIlty.
N. Dispute Resolution: Any claims, with the exception of claims by 8MI for non-payment of services rendered, or
disputes made during or after the performance of services between 8MI and the aient and its contractors, subcon.
tractors, suppliers, shall be submitted to mediation and/or arbitration.
O. WitIlllrawal of Propoal: This Proposal constitutes a non-binding offer to perfonn services and 8MI reserves the
right to withdraw or modify this proposal, without liability to the Client, at any limo prior to receipt ofwritten
acceptance from the Client and execution of a signed agreement in accordance with Paragraph P.
P. Agreement: If the Proposal is accepted, the aient and BMI may enter into and execute an Agreement
incorporating the Proposal, these Terms and such additional terms and conditions as may be mutually acceptable to 8MI
and Client Upon request by the Client, 8MI may, at its sole discretion and for the benefit of the aient, proceed with
any proposed services prior to execution of a written agreement. Iu the absence of a executed written agreement, the
accompanying Proposal and these Tenns of Proposal sba11 constitute the whole and complete agreement between 8MI
and the Client
~2of2-T~ofPro~1
5(-')
. .
e
e
e
.
Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2006 Fee Schedule
The following Schedule of Fees is based upon competent, responsible engineering and surveying services
and is the minimum, below which adequate professional standards cannot be maintained. It is, therefore,
to the advantage of both the Professional Engineer or Surveyor and lhe Client, that fees be commensurate
with the service rendered.
2006 Hourly BOling Rates
Principal EngineerlSurveyor .......... ....... ...................... $120-l70IHour
Associate Engineer/Surveyor ... ...... ............................... S9S-l351Hour
ProjectlDesign Engineer ................ .................... ...........$S5-l20IHour
Licensed Surveyor.. ....... ........... ,................................... S70-l301Hour
Project Surveyor.. .......... .......... ........ ................... ............ $SO-90lHour
Senior Technician ............... .......................................... SSS-1201Hour
Technician............ ...................... ..... ..... .......... ................ S40-9O/Hour
Clerical........................................................................... $30-85IHour
GPS/Robotic Survey Equipment ..................................... $45-801Hour
AutoCAD/Computer Time................................................. No Charge
Office Supplies.................................................................. No Charge
Photo CopyinglReproducrion...... ................. ........... ........... No Charge
Field SupplieslSurvey Stakes & Equipment ....................... No Charge
Mileage................. ....................... ........ ..... ......................... No Charge
Charges are based on hours spent at hourly rates in effect for the individuals performing the work The
hourly rates for Principals, Senior Associates, Associates and members of the staff vary according to skill
and experience. The Schedule of Fees shall apply for the period through December 31, 2006. These rates
may be adjusted annually thereafter to accoWlt for changed labor costs, inflation or changed overhead
conditions.
These rates include labor, general business and other norma1 and customary exp~ associated with
operating a professional business. Unless otherwise agreed, the above rates include vehicle and personal
expenses, mileage, telephone, survey stakes and routine expendable supplies; and no .separate charges win
be made for these activities and materials. Expenses beyond the agreed scope of services and non-routine
expenses, such as large quantities of prints, extra report copies, out-sourced graphics and photographic' .,
reproductions, document recording fees, outside professional and technical assistance and other items of
this general nature, wl1l be invoiced out separately. Rates and charges do not include sales tax, if
applicable.
When it is possible to accurately define the scope of the project and the engineering services to be
performed, a lump sum may be agreed upon for total compensation.
5L0
e
e
e
) ::~,.~
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, Director of Public Works
Kent Exner, City Engineer
RE: Consideration of Consulting Contract with Braun Intertec for Construction Testing
Services for 2006 Improvements
DATE: February 22, 2006
To ensure that acceptable materials are provided and proper construction methods are administered throughout
improvement project construction, material testing services by a geotechnical engineer are necessary. Braun
Intertec CSt.Cloud) has provided these services to the City for the past few years. Braun Intertec staff has
developed an efficient working relationship with the City, thus allowing them to reduce their normal testing
rates when providing services to the City.
Attached is the proposal provided by Braun Intertec for the administering of necessary material testing on an
as-needed basis. Also included is their 2006 Schedule of Charges that will be reduced by 10% when services
are invoiced to the City. The costs of these services are accounted for within improvement project budgets and
estimated fees.
We recommend executing the consulting contract with Braun Intertec.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
5lrY\)
BRAUN
INTERTEC
Braun 1_ CorporalM>"
1520 24th Avenue N
P.O. Box 189
St. Cloud, MN 56302
Phone: 320.253.9940
Fox: 320.253.3054
Web: brouninlerlec.com
R',;r--.~.
. \1...:. t \:.;".__
..., L;.; f '~/ t::. 0
JAN 2 (I 2006
CIty ~. .
. '" dutCh'
Gilg. D~nSor;
Proposal SC-06-5OO
January 18,2006
Mr. Kent Exner
City of Hutchinson
III Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350-5222
Dear Kent:
As requested, Braun Intertec Corporation is pleased to present this proposal for providing
engineering, enviroill1l<:ntal, and construction materials testing services during th.e 2006 construction
season.
Braun Intertec has been providing engineering and environmental services for the City of Hutchinson
for a number of years. We greatly appreciate our relationship with you and the City and look
forward to continuing working with you on your upcoming projects.
We will provide engineering, environmental and construction materials testing services for the City
of Hutchinson at a reduced rate of 90 percent of our current 2006 Schedule of Charges. Services
would be provided in accordance with our General Conditions, which are a part of this contract.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposed contract to you. It is being submitted in
duplicate so that, if it is acceptable to you, one copy may be signed and returned as a written
authorization to proceed.
If there are any questions on this proposed contract, please contact us at (320) 253-9940 or
(800) 828-7344.
Sincerely,
BRAUN INTERTJi:C CORPORA nON
f' /)p".'
J'--. f<(Y /
Thomas L. Henkemeyer
Associate Principal
Attachment:
General Conditions
Providing enginuring and env1ironmental sollltions since S( fY\]
-,
e
e
e
Authorization to Proceed:
City of Hutchinson
Proposal SC-06-500
January 18, 2006
Page 2
Please proceed according to the above stated terms and General Conditions:
Date
Client Name
Authorizer (please Print)
Authorized Signature
Title
:wpdatalpro\06-S00
sLm)
General Conditions
e
Our agreement with you consists of these
General Conditions and the accompanying
written proposal or authorization.
Section 1:
Our Responsibilities
1.1 We will provide the professional
services specifically described in our "Titten
agreement with you. You agree that we are not
responsible for professional services that are
not fairly included in our specific undertaking.
Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all of our
record findings, opinions, and
recommendstions will be provided to you in
writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings,
opinions. or recommendations without our
written approval.
1.2 In performing our services, we will
use that degree of care and skill ordinarily
exercised under similar circumstances by
reputable members of our profession
practicing in the same locality. If you direct us
to deviate from our recommended procedures,
you agree to hold us harmless from all claims,
damages, and expenses arising out of your
direction.
e
1.3 We will reference our field
observations and sampling to available
reference points, but we will not survey, set,
or check the accuracy of those points unless
we accept that duty in writing. It is understood
that locations of field observations or
sampling described in our report or shown on
our sketches are based on information
provided by others or estimates made by our
personnel. You agree that such dimensions,
depths, or elevations are approximations
unless specifically stated otherwise in the
report. You accept the inherent risk that
samples or observations may not be
representative of things not sampled or seen
and, further, that site conditions may change
over time.
1.4 Our duties do not include
supervising your contractors or commenting
on, overseeing, or providing the means and
methods oftheir work, unless we accept such
duties in writing. We will not he responsible
for the failure of your contractors to perform
in accordance with their undertakings, and the
providing of our services will not relieve
others of their responsibilities to you or to
others.
e
1.5 We will provide a health and safety
program for our employees, but we will not he
responsible for contractor, job, or site health
or safety unless we accept that duty in writing.
1.6 Our estimates of construction or
remediation costs will be based on informa-
tion available to us and on our experience and
knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of
our professional judgment and are not
guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may
vary. You should allow a contingency in
addition to estimated costs.
Sution2:
Your Responsibilities
2.1 You will provide access to tbe site.
In the course of our work some site damage is
normal even when due care is exercised. We
will use reasonable care to minimize damage
to the site. We have not included tbe cost of
restoration of normal dsmage in the estimated
charges. We will correct normal dsmage at
your direction and expense.
2.2 You agree to provide us, in a timely
manner, with information that you have
regarding buried objects at the site. Until we
have completed our work, you agree to
provide us with all of your plans, changes in
plans, and new information as to site
conditions. We will not be responsible for
locating buried objects at the site unless we
accept that duty in writing. You agree to hold
us harmless from all claims, damages, losses,
and related expenses involving buried objects
of which you had knowledge but did not
timely call to our attention or correctly show
on the plans you or others on' your behalf
furnished to us.
2.3 You will be responsible for the
cooperation of your employees and your
contractors in observing all radiation safety
standsrds after we notify you that radiographic
or gamma ray equipment or another nuclear
testing or measuring device will be used.
2.4 You will notify us ofany knowledge
or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or
dangerous materials in a sample provided to
us. You agree to provide us with information
in your possession or control relating to
contamination at the work site. If we observe
or suspect the presence of contaminants not
anticipated in our agreement, we may
terminate our work without liability to you or
to others, and we will be paid for the services
we have provided.
2.5 Neither this agreement nor the
providing of services will operate to make us
an owner, operator, generator, transporter,
treater, storer, or a disposal facility within the
meaning of the Resource Conservation
BRAUN
I NTE RTEC
Recovety Act, as amended. or within the
meaning of any other law governing the
handling, treatment, storage, or disposal of
hazardous materials. You agree to hold us
harmless and indemnify us from any such
claim or loss.
2.6 Ori Iling, well installation, and
remediation services may involve risk of
cross-contamination of previously
uncontaminated air, soil, and water. lfyou are
requesting that we provide .ervlees that
include this risk, you agree to hold us
harmless and indemnify us from cross-
contamination claims and damages, unless the
loss is caused by our negligence.
2.7 You agree to make disclosures
required by law. In the. event you do not own
the site, you acknowledge that it is your duty
to inform the owner of the discovery or
release of contaminants at the site. You agree
to hold us hannless and indemnify us from all
claims related to disclosures made by us that
are required by law and from all c.laims related
to the infonning Or failure to inform the site
owner of the discovety of contaminants.
SectIon 3:
Reports and Records
3.1 We will furnish reports to you in
duplicate. We will retain analytical data for
seven years and financial dsta for three years.
3,2 All samples remaining after tests are
conducted and field and laboratory equipment
that cannot be adequately cleansed of
contaminants are and continue to be your
property. They will be discarded or returned to
you, at our di scretion, unless within 15 days
of the report date you give us written direction
to store or transfer the materials at your
expense.
3.3 Our reports, notes, calculations, and
other documents and our computer software
and dsta are instruments of1Jur service to you,
and they remain our property but are subject
to a license to you for your use in the related
project for the purposes disclosed to us. You
may not transfer our reports to others or use
them for a pl1rpose for which they were not
prepared without our written approval, which
will not be unreasonably withheld. At your
request, we ...nIl provide endorsements of our
reports or le~ers of reliance, but only if the
recipients agree to be bound by the terms of
our agreement with you and only if we are
paid the administrative fee stated in our then
current Schedule of Charges.
. PrvWling ~ and enViron>nel1t4l solutions since 1957
sLrv-0
e BRAUN"
INTERTEC
e
e
Schedule of Chare:es (effective January 1. 2006)
Braun Intertec Corporation
Braun Intertec Great Lakes, Inc.
Service Locations
Minneapolis, MN
St. Paul, MN
Albertville, MN
Hibbing, MN
Lakeville, MN
Rochester, MN
St. Cloud, MN
Fargo, NO
Bismarck, NO
La Crosse, WI
Detroit, MI
5(~
e
e
e
Geotechnical Services
Hourly rates apply for regular-time (8 hours or less on
weekdays). Hourly rates do not include support truck or
carrier rental or use, mileage, supplies consumed in
drilling or abandoned in test holes, or per diem expenses.
DriIllng Equipment, Services & Personnel
1002 Drilling services
1004 Truck-or skid mounted drill rig, includes:
crew chief and drill rig assistant, per hour
1062 Additional for a11.terrain drill rig, per hour
1087 Daily mobilization expense (includes
support truck rental and mileage, drill rig
mileage, and tractorllowboy mileage if
applicable, per day
1067 Tractor and low.boy trailer, per day
1005 Travel time, drill crew or two-person field
crew, per hour
(I)
197.00
47.00
(I)
115.00
146.00
1018 Overtime addition to all two-person
operations for work on Saturday or in excess
of 8 hours per day on weekdays, per hour 37.00
1019 Overtime addition to all two-person crew
operations for work on Sunday, per hour 73.00
Additional crew person . when special conditions
require (in addition to hourly charges of"IOO4" and
"1005" above):
1014 Regular time basis, per hour
10 16 Overtime basis, per hour
8300 Site layout & utility clearance, per hour
ConmmabJe Materials
101 I Well materials, 2" PVC, per foot (excludes
well protection and protective casing)
1039 Well materials, 2" black iron, per foot
(excludes well screen, well protection and
protective casing)
1088 Stain.less steel well screen, per 10', each
1058 Protective casing materials, each
\070 Bore hole abandonment materials, per foot
1073 Sealing records, each
1022 Thin-walled sample tubes (ASTM D 1587),
each
. See Page 10
(1) Quoted on an individual basis.
61.00
76.00
87.00
7.00
10.00
302.00
156.00
1.60
50.00
20.00
OthCl" Expense Charges and Miscellaneous Services
1044 Surcharge for continuous tube sample
system (2.114" x 5"), per hour 34.00
1068 Material for specialized unrecoverable
installations such as piezometers,
monitoring wells, well.points, settlement
plates, etc. Rental of road signs or
equipment, special insurance, permits.
Consumable supplies such as roller bits,
drilling fluid additives, grout, level B.C-D
protection, etc. Cost + 15%
1072 Subcontracted specialized services such as
snow plowing, grading for access, towing,
etc. Cost +15%
1074 Welder or shop person on fabricating,
assembly, or loading of specialized
equipment, per hour 72.00
1080 Stearn cleaning of drill rig and tools, per
stearn (equipment only) 104.00
Geotechnical Equipment ReataJ
1030 Vane shear equipment (ASTM D 2573), per
day 260.00
1032 Electrical resistively equipment, per day 94.00
1040 Pressure meter equipment, per day
536.00
1056 Cone penetrometer equipment, per day
390.00
Laboratory Tests of Soils
1152 Moisture content (ASlM D 2216)
13.00
1154 Moisture content and density
26.00
1156 Atterberg Limits: LL and PL (ASTM D
4318) 87.00
1157 Atterberg Limits: LL and PL (AASHTO T89
and T90 and Wet Preparation (AASHTO
Tl46) 114.00
January I, 2006
Page 1
5rn]
Grain Size Analysis 1210 Consolidated.Drained (includes pore.
e pressure measurements) 640.00
1162 Sieve analysis through No. 200 Sieve
(ASTM C 136, D 1140 or C 117) 104.00 Corrosion Potential and MlsceUaneous
1166 No. 200 only (ASTM C 117 or D 1140) 59.00 1214 pH determination (ASTM G 51) 17.25
1170 Hydrometer analysis only (ASTM D 422) 83.00 1216 Electrical resistively of soils (ASTM G 57) 59.00
1172 MechanicllJ (sieve-hydrometer analysis 1218 Oxidation.reduction 49.00
(ASTM D 422) 137.00
1220 Sulfate (concrete) 30.00
1174 Organic content (ASTM D 2974) 59.00
1222 Sulfide (meta1s) 45.00
1176 Specific gravity of fine-grained soils (ASTM
D 854) 101.00 1226 Topsoil testing, MNIDOT 3877A (without
nutrients) 192.00
Permeability
1228 Topsoil testing, MNDOT 3877B (with
1180 Granular soils, less than 10 percent fines nutrients) 242.00
(ASTM D 2434) 279.00
1229 Topsoil testing, nutrients 49.00
1183 All other soils (ASTM D 5084, EPA 9100,
or COE undisturbed sample, includes 1230 Specialty testing (I)
extrusion) 404.00
1232 Sample preparation, per hour 61.00
1184 Permeability testing with permeants (I)
1234 Extrusion of thin-walled tube 23.00
1185 All other soils (ASTM D 5084, EPA 9100,
e or COE remolded sample, does not include 1236 Surcharge for contaminated soils (I)
Proctor) 483.00
Construction Testing and Observations
Strength and Compressibility Testing
1186 Unconfined compression (ASTM D 2166) 72.00 Earthwork (excavation observation, compactlon control
testing, special foundation installations)
1190 Direct shear, granular soil (per nonnalload) 1304 Engineering consulting services as in section
(ASTM D 3080) 212.00 "100"" (I)
1192 Direct shear, cohesive soil (per nonnalload) 1306 Special inspection and other on.site
(ASTM D 3080) 279.00 observation services. Hourly rates as shown
11% Consolidation testing, one-dimensional in section" I 00*", plus vehicle and mileage (I)
(strain vs. pressure curve only) 1307 Quality control testing for earthwork
(ASTM D 2435) 312.00 activities. Hourly rates as shown in section
1198 Consolidation testing, time-mte (e-Iog p "100*", plus vehicle and mileage (I)
curve, time-deflection curves, and cv, Pc, 1308 Nuclear moisture-density meter charge in
and Cc values) (ASTM D 2435) 468.00 addition to hourly rates in section "100*,"
per hour 15.00
One Dimensional Swell Test
Maximum swell pressure (ASTM D 4546) 242.00 1310 Field labomtory rental including utilities, if
1202 required (I)
Triaxial testing (per confining pressure, remolded or 1314 Compaction Test, Sand-Cone Method
extruded, does not include Proctor): (ASTM D 1556), or Nuclear Method
UnCQDSOlidated-Undrained (ASTM D 2850) 404.00 (ASTM D 2922) (nonnal conditionsHPlus
1206 standby, travel time and vehicle charges),
e per test 35.00
1208 Consolidated-Undrained (includes pore-
pressure measurements)(ASTM D 4767) 483.00
* See Page 10 lanumy I, 2006
(1) Quoted OIl an individual basis. Page 2
Sfr\)
1318
Proctor test (ASTM D 698 or
1366
Accelerated curing and testing
ASTM D 1557)
145.00
(ASTM D 684), per unit
65.00
1322
One -point Proctor check
55.00
1367
Standard curing and testing of flexural
beans— includes mold rental and cleanup
1324
Maximum - minimum density of cohesionless
(ASTM C 78 and ASTM C 293), per unit
94.00
soils (ASTM D 4523, D 4254)
242.00
1368
Splitting tensile strength of 6" x 12"
Deep Foundation and Vibration
concrete cylinder or concrete cores
(ASTM C 496), per sample
71.00
1340
Special inspection of pile or drilled shaft
installation. Hourly rates as shown in
1371
Dry unit weight (ASTM C 567), per set
90.00
section "100 " ", plus vehicle and mileage
(1)
1372
Specific Gravity and voids
1342
Pile Driving Analyzer equipment rental,
(ASTM C 642), per unit
172.00
per day
952.00
1380
Sawing of concrete unit (ASTM C 31), per
1343
Wave Equation analysis
228.00
cut
9.25
1344
CAPWAP analysis
468,00
Concrete cylinder molds (includes labels and data
slips):
1346
Seismographic equipment (reduced weekly
and monthly rates for continuous service),
1386
Concrete cylinder molds, each
2.50
per day
147.00
1392
4" x 4" "cippoc" molds, each
25.00
1347
Static or cyclic load testing (compression,
tension with environmental control)
(1)
1394
Rental of steel mold, per use
23.00
Concrete
1395
Specialty mold rental (cubes and beams),
per use
39.00
1356
Theoretical concrete mix design based on
•
ACI 211 (does not include laboratory testing
1385 –
Curing cooler, each
20.00
of materials, trail batching or review of
historical data), per mix
(1)
1396
Concrete cylinder "hot box" during winter
construction, per month
76.00
1358
Laboratory trial batch concrete mix design
(does not include laboratory testing of
1397
Compressive strength of cippocs
materials or concrete cylinder compression
(ASTM C 873)
61.00
tests)
(1)
1398
Concrete coring — portable core drill with
1360
Special inspection and other on -site
diamond bits at 2- to 12 -inch diameter,
observation services. Hourly rates as shown
crew. Excludes mileage, truck rental and bit
in section "100", plus vehicle and mileage
(1)
wear (3 -hour minimum), per hour
153.00
1361
Quality control testing for concrete
1405
Bit wear and patch material, per core
15.00
placernent activities. Hourly rates as shown
in section "100• ", plus vehicle and mileage
(1)
1400
Core truck, per day, plus mileage
99.00
Laboratory moist- curing of concrete delivered to
1401
Compressive strength of concrete cores
laboratories:
including physical measurements and
trimming, ASTM C 42, each
76.00
1369
Compression testing 4x8" cylinders
(ASTM C 39) and concrete unit processing,
Petrographic
handling and mold (cast by Braun Intertec),
per unit
21.00
2101
Petrographic analysis of concrete
(ASTM C 856), per sample
799.00
1364
Compression testing 6x12" cylinders
(ASTM C 39) and concrete unit processing,
2102
Hardened air content analysis
handling and mold (cast by Braun Intertec),
(ASTM C 457), per sample
555.00
per unit
23.00
• 1363
Compression testing (ASTM C 39) (cast by
2103
Estimated hardened air content (Abbreviated
others), per unit
25.00
ASTM C 457), per sample
308.00
See
Page 10
January 1, 2006
(1) Quoted on an individual basis.
Page 3
2104
Petrographic analysis of coarse aggregate
1418
Absorption and saturation coefficient
(ASTM C 295), per sample
1,538.00
(ASTM C 67 /C), per set
192.00
2105
Petrographic analysis of fine Aggregate
1419
Dimensional analysis (ASTM C 67/C 216),
(ASTM C 295), per sample
1,721.00
per set
187.00
2106
Petrographic analysis of mortar (ASTM C
1423
Warpage (ASTM C 67/C 216), per set
222.00
1324), per sample
1,598.00
1420
Standard brick testing (ASTM C 67/C 216),
Masonry
per set (does not include freeze/thaw and
dimensional analysis testing)
750.00
Concrete Masonry Units - Standard:
Specialty Concrete
1445
Special inspection and other on -site
observation services. Hourly rates as shown
1425
Length change (ASTM C 67), per set of 5
in section "100", plus vehicle and mileage
(1)
samples
600.00
1403
Compressive strength (ASTM C 140) RWU,
1427
Locate reinforcing steel, Pachometer, per
each
38.00
hour
94.00
1404
Compressive strength (ASTM C 140),
1433
Rental of Windsor probe, Schmidt Hammer
Block, each
38.00
or prof mmeter, per day
76.00
1402
Absorption of RWU (ASTM C 140), each
49.00
1437
Length change of hardened concrete
(ASTM C 157), per set of 3 samples
475.00
1406
Physical measurements and absorption
(ASTM C 140), each
51.00
1441
Rapid freeze/thaw (ASTM C 666), per set
762.00
1407
Net area determination (ASTM C 140), each
38.00
1448
Chloride ion concentration (FHWA), per
sample
46.00
1408
Brick prism assembly (ASTM C 1314,
•
E 447), each
85.00
1449
Acid soluble chloride ion, per sample
62.00
1409
Compressive strength — Hollow block
1450
Bulk sample preparation, per sample
88.00
prisms (ASTM C 1314), each
143.00
1456
Rapid chloride permeability (ASTM
1411
Compressive strength — Grout block prisms
1202/AASHTO T 277) first specimen, each
415.00
(ASTM C 1314), each
149.00
1458
Rapid chloride permeability (ASTM
1412
Compressive strength — Grout
1202/AASHTO T 277) each additional
(ASTM C 1019), each
50.00
specimen in single set up to 4 total
specunens,each
42.00
1421
Linear shrinkage (ASTM C 426), each
596.00
1459
Diffusivity determination, section method,
1424
Freeze/ff haw of RWU (ASTM C 1262), per
each
645.00
set of 5
674.00
1436
Rental of V- meter, per day
347.00
1426
Fire rating (UBC or NCMA), each
15.00
1462
Ultrasonic testing of concrete (ASTM C
1413
Freezetthaw of brick and concrete pavers
597)
(1)
(ASTM C 67), per set
741.00
1414
Specialty testing of brick or block
(1)
1463
Adiabatic heat measurement (does not
include trial botching), per mix
598.00
1410
Modulus of rupture, per set
222.00
1466
Setting time (ASTM C 403), per sample
258.00
1415
Efflorescence of brick or masonry units
(ASTM C 67 /C 216), per set of 10 samples
150.00
Cement
1416
Initial rate of absorption (ASTM C
1474
Air content of cement mortar
•
67/C 216), per set
149.00
(ASTM C 185), per sample
127.00
1417
Compressive strength (ASTM C 67/C 216),
1476
Fineness of cement by air permeability
per set
135.00
(ASTM C 204), per sample
88.00
See
Page 10
January 1, 2006
(1) Quoted on an individual basis.
Page 4
1480 Casting- of mortar cubes, laboratory mixed 1540 Marshall density testing, triple specimen
(does not include mold rental and cleanup) (AASHTO T245) 98.00
e (ASTM C 109), set of6 148.00
1542 Thickness and density of pavement core
1481 Compressive strength of cement mortar (ASTM D 2726) 41.00
cubes (ASTM C 109), per unit 21.00
1544 Moisture susceptibility of bituminous
Mortar (ASTM D 1075) 259.00
Compressive strength of 2" x 2" mortar cube 1552 Bituminous coring-portable core drill with
(ASTM C 109): diamond bits at 2. to 12.inch diameter,
crew. Excludes mileage, truck rental and bit
1490 Field cast, each 21.00 wear (3.hour minimum), per hour 153.00
1492 Laboratory cast, each 25.00 1555 Bit wear and patch material, per core 15.00
1493 Compression testing of cylindrical mortar 1558 Lottman stripping (AASHTO T283) 278.00
specimens (ASTM C 780), each 21.00
1562 Laboratory mix design (Marshal]) (I)
1464 Rapid set grout 36.00
1563 Laboratory mix design (Gyratory) (I)
Bond Strength of Mortar to Masonry Units
(ASTM C 952): 1567 Resilient modulus of bituminous, per core (1)
1500 Brick (laboratory cast), each 83,00 1568 Gyratory gravity (AASHTO T3 ]2) 145_00
1501 Brick (field cast), each 44.00 ]569 Mobile laboratory rental (I)
Flexural bond strength of brick units (ASTM E 518): 1377 Profilograph (I)
e 1506 Field cast, each 135.00 SoU imd Aggregate Testing for Concrete,
Bituminous, RoofiDg, etc.
1507 Laboratory cast, each 210.00
1684 Lightweight particles (ASTM C 123) 64.00
1510 Water retention (ASTM C 91), per sample 151.00
1685 Lightweight particles (Chert) 117.00
Flexural bond strength of brick units (ASTM C 1072):
1686 Spall material (MNIDOT) 102.00
1516 Prism testing, per prism 267.00
1688 Percent crushed (MNIDOT) 64.00
Bituminous
1692 Coarse aggregate specific gravity 65.00
1525 Sample preparation, per hour 61.00 (ASTM C ]27)
1526 Marshall design point ]62.00 1694 Fine aggregate specific gravity 98.00
(ASlM C 128)
1528 Rice specific gravity (ASTM D 2041) 64.00
1696 Vacuum saturated specific gravity 126.00
1529 Gyratory design point 182.00 (IA 1M 380)
1530 Asphalt content (ASTM D 217216307) 121.00 1698 Abrasion (ASlM C 131, C535) 104.00
]532 Extracted aggregate gradation ]700 Soundness (ASTM C 88}--5 cycles 259.00
(ASTM D 5444) 83.00
1702 Flatness and elongation (ASTM D 4791) 76.00
1534 Marshall stability and flow (set of3)
(ASThl D 1559) 49.00 1703 Flakiness index (BS 812) 127.00
e 1538 Marshall density testing, single specimen 1704 Potentia] reactivity (ASTM C 289) 990.00
(ASlM D ]559) 71.00
1429 Potential reactivity (ASTM C1260) 652.00
· See Page 10 January I, 2006
(1) Quoted on an individual basis. Page 5
5L rY\j
Stone
1746 Compressive strength, includes end cutting
(ASTM C 170), per sample
1747 Unconfined compressive strength of intact
rock core specimen (ASTM D 2938), per
sample
1750 Absorption and specific gravity of stone
(ASTM C 97), per sample
1751 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion
(ASTM D 5335), per sample
• See Page 10
(1) Quoted on an individual basis.
63.00
59.00
104.00
17.25
64.00
49.00
103.00
257.00
146.00
146.00
361.00
239.00
57.00
71.00
385.00
468.00
(1)
104.00
88.00
88.00
44.00
(1)
Geosynthetic and Pond Liner
1753 Shear/Peel tests on field seams (HDPE,
VLDPE), per sample
1754 Material property testing (strength,
elongation, creep, cyclic stress - stain, etc.)
Window
(Note: cost of aerial platform, scaffolding, exterior
heat and enclosure, winter conditions are not
included and will be priced based on job
conditions. Work does not include repair of access
holes, replacement of broken window trim, paint or
wallpaper repair.)
1772 Air and water infiltration testing, new
construction QA (ASTM E- 1105), per
window
1778 Specialty testing
Fire - Resistive Materials
1781 Special inspection and other on -site
observations or testing. Hourly rates as
shown in section "100* ", plus vehicle and
mileage
1784 lhickness/Density, laboratory determination
1785 Adhesion/Cohesion testing, per test
1786 Specialty testing
Other Specialty Testing
1791 Specialty testing
1792 Hydrostatic pressure testing
1793 Mechanical testing
1794 Floor flatness
1795 Dipstick rental (one week minimum), per
week
1796 Dipstick rental (one week minimum), per
additional day
72.00
(1)
1,144.00
(1)
(
41.00
36.00
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
532.00
156.00
January 1, 2006
Page 6
-5tm)
1705
Fine aggregate particle shape (AASHTO
1304)
1706
Unit weight (ASTM C 29)
1708
Mill abrasion (RR)
1712
Moisture content (ASTM C 566)
1714
Hardness (Moh's Scratch)
1716
Organic impurities (ASTM C 40)
1718
Clay lumps (ASTM C 142), per size tested
1720
Freeze -thaw (AASHTO T103)
1723
Insoluble residue (MN/DOT), physical
testing
1724
Insoluble residue (MN/DOT), chemical
treatment
1732
Hveem stabilometer R -Value (MN/DOT)
(does not include proctor or classification
tests)
1734
California bearing ratio, per molded
specimen (ASTM D 1883)
1736
Sample preparation, per hour
1738
Sample crushing, per hour
1739
Resilient modulus of fine grain soils
(molded)
1761
Resilient modulus of coarse grain soils and
aggregate
1740
Specialized testing
1741
Sand equivalent (AASHTO T176)
Stone
1746 Compressive strength, includes end cutting
(ASTM C 170), per sample
1747 Unconfined compressive strength of intact
rock core specimen (ASTM D 2938), per
sample
1750 Absorption and specific gravity of stone
(ASTM C 97), per sample
1751 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion
(ASTM D 5335), per sample
• See Page 10
(1) Quoted on an individual basis.
63.00
59.00
104.00
17.25
64.00
49.00
103.00
257.00
146.00
146.00
361.00
239.00
57.00
71.00
385.00
468.00
(1)
104.00
88.00
88.00
44.00
(1)
Geosynthetic and Pond Liner
1753 Shear/Peel tests on field seams (HDPE,
VLDPE), per sample
1754 Material property testing (strength,
elongation, creep, cyclic stress - stain, etc.)
Window
(Note: cost of aerial platform, scaffolding, exterior
heat and enclosure, winter conditions are not
included and will be priced based on job
conditions. Work does not include repair of access
holes, replacement of broken window trim, paint or
wallpaper repair.)
1772 Air and water infiltration testing, new
construction QA (ASTM E- 1105), per
window
1778 Specialty testing
Fire - Resistive Materials
1781 Special inspection and other on -site
observations or testing. Hourly rates as
shown in section "100* ", plus vehicle and
mileage
1784 lhickness/Density, laboratory determination
1785 Adhesion/Cohesion testing, per test
1786 Specialty testing
Other Specialty Testing
1791 Specialty testing
1792 Hydrostatic pressure testing
1793 Mechanical testing
1794 Floor flatness
1795 Dipstick rental (one week minimum), per
week
1796 Dipstick rental (one week minimum), per
additional day
72.00
(1)
1,144.00
(1)
(
41.00
36.00
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
532.00
156.00
January 1, 2006
Page 6
-5tm)
Nondestructive Examination Services
e 1600 Special inspection services. Hourly rates as Weld Procedure QualifICations
shown in section "100''', plus vehicle and
mileage (I) 1619 A WS D 1.1, client provides machining 996.00
1620 ASMElANSI, client provides machining 996.00
1675 Non-special inspection services based on
unit rates in section "100''', plus mileage 1622 A WS D 1.2, client provides machining 996.00
and vehicle (I)
NDE Consnrnables
1602 Computed radiography, per section "100'" (I)
1630 Consumable dry powder, per pound 24.00
1625 Visual weld examination, per section "100' (I) 1631 Fluorescent oil bath, per gallon 24.00
1632 Fluorescent water bath, per gallon 20.00
1627 Bolting examination, per section "100'" (I) 1633 Portable visible spray, per can 18.20
1634 Portable fluorescent spray, per can 20.00
1629 Magnetic particle examination, per section
"'100*" (I) 1636 Portable developer, per can 18.20
1637 Portable cleaner, per can 18.20
1635 Liquid penetrant examination, per section 1638 Portable visible penetrant, per can 18.20
"100." (I) 1639 Portable fluorescent penetrant, per can 24.00
1640 Ultrasonic examination, per section "100'" (I) 1641 Cellulose gum, per gallon 14.80
1642 Cellulose gum (with certifications), per
1645 Radiography examination, per section quart 46.00
"100." (I) 1643 High temperature couplant, per 4 oz. tube 117.00
1656 Infrared services, per hour 164.00 1646 4.112" x 10" film 4.50
1657 Infrared services, overtime, per hour 204.00 1647 4-112" x 17" film 7.90
1648 14"x 17"film 27.00
1658 Infrared report 160.00 1649 8" x 10" film 7.90
e 1699 Thermographic imaging 585.00 1650 5" x 7" film 3,90
1651 7" x 17" film 13.80
1652 \0" x 12" film 13.80
1653 Concrete radiography (I)
1655 Radiation protection services. Hourly rates NDE Miscellaneous Expense
as shown in section "100"", plus vehicle and 1660 Vehicle, per day 36.00
mileage (I) 1661 Vehicle mileage, per mile 0.55
1662 Mobile darkroom, per day 6\.00
1654 Positive materials identification (PMI), per 1663 Mobile darkroom, per mile 0.74
hour (I) 1664 Trip charge (I)
1659 Positive materials identification (pMI), per 1666 Report 364.00
day (1)
1667 Radiography, cobalt, per shot (I) Geopbysical Testing
1668 Radiography, iridium, per shot (I) 1443 Ground penetrating radar, per additional
location 86.00
WeldiDg Opentor Examination 1445 Ground penetrating radar, per \0> day 1,929.00
1447 Ground penetrating radar, per day 2,786.00
1604 Bend tests 199.00
1605 Radiography 106.00 5097 GPS receiver, per day 322.00
1611 Radiography, A WS D\.l 106.00 5098 GPS receiver, per week 1,072.00
1612 Bend tests, A WS D I_I 177.00
1613 Radiography, ASMElANSI 106.00
1614 Bend tests, ASMElANSI 177.00
1617 318" Weld test coupons, AWS D\.l, per set 36.00
1618 I" Weld test coupons, AWS Dl.l, per set 46.00
e
. See Page 10
(I) Quoted on an individual basis.
January 1, 2006
Page 7
5L~
Environmental Site Evaluation Services
e Gronndwater Sampling Field Analysis/Air Quality
Generator Organic vapor analyzer
5000 Per day 80.00 5029 Per hour 35.00
5001 Per week 186.00 5030 Per day 204.00
5031 Per week 676.00
Grundfos pump
5003 Per day 80.00 TVA.IOO PID, FID
5004 Per week 308.00 5032 Per hour 38.00
5033 Per day 217.00
Grundfos converter
5005 Per day 43.00 Photoionization analyzer) 0.6 eV lamp
5006 Per week 204.00 5035 Per hour 33.00
5036 Per day 186.00
5007 Flow meter or Stevens recorder, per day 31.00 5037 Per week 738.00
Submersible pumps, bailer, conductivity Photoionization analyzer, I 1.8 eV lamp
meter, pH meter, dissolved oxygen meter, 5038 Per hour 35.00
nutrient kit 5039 Per day 204.00
5008 Per hour 38.00 5040 Per week 799.00
5009 Per day 248.00
5010 Per week 922.00 4-gas meter
5043 Per hour 26.00
Turbidimeter 5044 Per day 117.00
5011 Per hour 23.00 5045 Per week 492.00
5012 Per day 74.00
5013 Per week 248.00 3-ges meter
5046 Per hour 26.00
Data Acquisition System 5047 Per day 112.00
e 5014 Rental rate (1)
MSA methane monitor
5017 Soil venting test equipment, per day 72.00 5049 Per hour 26.00
5050 Per day 105.00
5018 Ordinary consumables, per well 36.00 5051 Per week 431.00
YSI water quality monitor Particulate, aerosol, dust monitor
5019 Per hour 36.00 5052 Per hour 31.00
5020 Per day 168.00 5053 Per day 148.00
50S4 Per week 591.00
5023 Hydropunch equipment, per day 285.00
5055 Surveying equipment, per hour 15.00
5025 Disposable bailer, each 13.00 Video camera rental, per day
5056 46.00
5026 Field alkalinity, per sarq>le 15.20 5057 Radon canister, each 79.00
5027 Field filtering water, per sample 15.20
5028 Field DO with Winkler method, per sample 15.20
Interface probe
5080 Per hour 14.80
5081 Per day 94.00
5082 Per week 370.00
Water JeveJtape
5083 Per hour 13.00
5084 Per day 86.00
e 5085 Per week 345.00
. See Page 10 JanU8l)' 1,2006
(1) Quoted on an individual basis. PageS
SLrr)
e
e
e
Industrial Hygiene Equipment/Supplies Pavement Evaluation Services
5065 Q- Trak IAQ monitor (I) Nondestructive testing and analysis
flexible pavements (rates per mile)
5066 Dustrak monitor (I)
8500 Parking Lot Testing and Evaluation Servkes
5068 Filter cassettes (I) 8510 Surface condition surveys . (I)
8540 Rehabilitation/maintenance schedule (I)
5069 Sorbent tubes, passive dosimeters (I) 8620 Falling Weight Deflectomer (FWD) 331.00
8640 Mobilization 186.00
5070 Draeger tubes, each (I) Expenses
Air sampling pumps 1852 Vehicle charge and mileage applying to
5072 Per day 39.00 section "100.", and other sections when not
5073 Per week (I) included in hourly rates (other vehicle rates
Draeger pump govern where listed) (I)
5074 Per day 21.00 1854 Vehicle, per day 36.00
5075 Per week 78.00
Noise dosimeters/sound level meter 1856 Vehicle mileage, per mile 0.47
5076 Per day (]) Trip charge 40.00
1861
XRF Spectrum analyzer 1863 Per diem expenses when working away from
5086 Per hour 94.00
5087 Per day 566.00 headquarters or branch locations Cost + 15%
5088 Per week 2,828.00
]864 Miscellaneous expenses Cost + 15%
5105 Ventilation smoke tube (I)
5106 Andersen sampler (I) 1866 Subcontracted professional services Cost + 15%
5107 High volume pump (I)
5111 Zefon filter, each 10.00 3715 Project supplies and equipment Cost + 15%
5118 Moisture meter (I)
3192 Otherlmiscellaneous (I) C]erical Services
Miscellaneous Equipment Rental/Supplies ]904 Library retrieval for additional copies after
initial distribution of report 63.00
Metal detectorlline locator
5089 Per hour 15.00 1906 Report reproduction of extra copies, per
5090 Per day 80.00 page. Bulk copying quoted on an individual
5091 Per week 130.00 basis 0.48
Trimb]e GeoXT GPS (sub-meter horizontal only) 3766 24x36" or larger color plot, each, 7.30
5096 Per hour 26.00
5095 Per day 193.00 3768 24x36" or larger black & white plot, each 4.20
5098 Per week 770.00
Trimble R8 Rover GPS (horizontal and vertical) Computer Aided Drafting (CAD)
5099 Per hour 52.00 Phase I site map (not to sca]e) 58.00
5100 Per day 375.00 3750
5]01 Per week 1,498.00 3751 Phase ] site map (to scale) 89.00
5092 Master locks-brass, each 20.00 3752 Soil boring location sketch (not to scale) 73.00
5093 Sequential sampler, per day 84.00 3753 Soil boring location sketch (to scale) 136.00
3754 Groundwater contour map (3 pt) 42.00
3755 Groundwater contour map (4+ pt) 58.00
3756 Soil and groundwater contamination map
(single chemical) 42.00
3757 Soil and groundwater contamination map
(multi chemical) 68.00
· See Page 10
(I) Quoted on an individual basis.
January I, 2006
Page 9
5LYY\)
Reg.. Over". Double..
Time Time Time
e 100 Personnel Services, per hour Field and office services
121 Engineer-in-training 90 102 Technician I 58 68 78
300 Scientist-in-training 90 106 Technician II 68 78 94
118 Staff Engineer 100 110 Technician m 78 94 104
320 Staff Scientist 100 III Technician IV 89 104 liS
ISO Architectural Technologist 100 138 Project Assistant 68 84
126 Project Engineer 130 371 CADD/Graphics Operator 85 98
330 Project Scientist 130
128 Senior Engineer 150 Nondestructive Examination (NDE) Technicians
340 Senior Scientist ISO 104 Radiographer's Assistant 63 73 94
155 Senior Architect ISO 108 Level II NDE Technician 78 104 130
629 Magnetic Particle
130 Principal Engineer 170 635 Liquid Penetrant
640 Ultrasonic
350 Principal Scientist 170 645 Solo Technician-Radiography
133 Principal Consultant 205 200 ICC Structural Steel
e Technician/Observer 84 115 151
226 Project Manager (I)
600 RT FOTensic 136 182 250
228 Senior Project Manager (I)
602 Computed Radiography 260
112 A WS-Certified Weld Insp. 84 110 136
613 Radiography, two-man crew
(IR-192) 136 177 224
254 PMI (positive material identifier)
services 156 214 281
615 Radiography, two-man crew
(C0-60)... 177 208 234
107 API 5101570/653 Technician 99 120 167
117 Level III NDE services 115
.
Reduced weekly and monthly rates available for
continuous service.
Overtime me. apply after 8 haws. befon: 7 a.m.
and after 5 p,rn., Monday through Friday, or
Saturday. Double time Tates apply to all SlIIIday
or Holiday work.
Co-6O work may require three-man crew.
Code lIS plus Assistant code 104.
..
e
...
(I) Quoted on an individual basis.
January I, 2006
Page 10
5r0
e
e
e
",,"'/';"'/_;#/"_/_/'/_/~/__/_/.I/I/'/_/_/_/_/6'/'/_/"'/I/_/I'/.#/1/1/#/1/_/1/1/'/_.1_/6'/1/_/1/1/1/1/_/_/1/1/1/_/#/1/#/-'/#"-I'/_/_/_/i#'/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_"'/IY_/'/_?';~
, CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ~
~#/I~#""'/''''_''/_~-:I/I/''''/_/_/'''/'/'/I/I/I/I/_/_/_/_/_/'/I'/_/1/1/1/1/'/1/#/_/1'/_,0,/'/1/1_/1/;//'."/6/1/_/'/'/.#_/1,""'/#/1/1/I/#'I"'/I/I'/_'I/I/I/I/,I"/I/IMP/.I/I;l
To:
Hutchinson City Council
From:
Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building
Date:
February 22, 2006 - Meeting Date February 28, 2006
Re:
Franchise Agreement - February 28, 2006
The City has received a franchise agreement request from the Hutchinson Chamber of
Commerce and Convention Visitors Bureau to provide banners for the main street areas
of town. The proposal would be that the Chamber would be responsible for fundraising
and procuring the baiiners. There would be 3 sets of banners in addition to the already
acquired holiday banners. Because of the fmancial commitment (3 year period) being
made by donors, the Chamber is requesting an agreement with the City to ensure that
these banners are utilized and displayed through their established life. Part of the
fundraising will include an installation fee to be paid to the City on yearly basis. This fee
could be in lieu the franchise normally charged to applicants.
Staff is recommending approval of the franchise agreement because this allows for
private funding in lieu of public expenditures to accomplish the project. If you have any
questions, please call me 320-234-4258.
~L0
Ordinance No. 06-0428
Publication No.
_AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, GRANTING FRANCHISE TO HUTCHINSON AREA
. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, CVB, TO PERMIT BANNERS ON CITY OWNED STREET LIGHT POLES
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section I. The City of Hutchinson, in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereafter referred to as Grantor, hereby
grants to Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce, CVB, hereafter referred to as Grantee, a franchise to place banners on City owned
street light poles along Main Street/Hwy 15 from 1st Ave. N.E. to Century Ave. and a one block portion of Washington Ave. West.
Section 2. The franchise is granted for a term of6 year (s) commencing on the date of the acceptance of the franchise.
Grantee shall file a written acceptance of the franchise with the City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson within ten (10) days after
the effective date of this ordinance. The franchise shall become effective only when the acceptance has been filed and evidence of
general comprehensive and liability insurance provided for in this grant of franchise has been filed and approved. In addition, a yearly
filing fee of must be paid. Furthermore, at the end of the franchise period, the City will allow the Hutchinson Area
Chamber of Commerce, CVB, to renew the franchise agreement through a separate process.
Section 3. Grantor reserves the right to enforce reasonable regulations concerning construction, operation and maintenance
of facilities located along, over and under the public premises before mentioned and the placement of such facilities.
Section 4. Grantee will ensure that the highest quality of banners shall be used. Banners that fall into a state of disrepair, in
the sole judgment of the Grantor, will be removed by the Grantor. Grantee shall bear the expense ofand reimburse the City for the
installation, changing and removal of the banners. Additionally, the Grantor agrees to allow the Grantee to provide banners for the
areas depicted on Exhibit A.
Section 5. Grantee shall not have the right to assign the franchise otherwise transfer it in any manner whatsoever or sell,
lease, license, mortgage, or permit others to use transfer in any manner whatsoever any interest in all or any part of its facilities that
are installed or operated under this grant, except on prior written approval by ordinance of the City Council of the City of Hutchinson.
e Section 6. In the event that Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce, CVB, should fail to use the franchise for one calendar
year, this franchise shall be deemed null and void and shall revert to the City of Hutchinson without any action on the part of the City
of Hutchinson whatsoever.
Section 7. TheCity may at the point of expiration of this franchise or for public purposes request that the encroachments be
removed from the rights of way at the Grantees expense.
Section 8. This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication, subject to the provision above requiring
written acceptance by Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce.
Adopted by the City Council, this ~day of March. 2006.
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on
First Reading: February 28. 2006
Second Reading: March 14.2006
e
Lp Lc0
e
e
e
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hessan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN SS3so.2522
320-S87-S1Sl1Fax 320-234-4240
M
RAN D
u
~1
E"..
:...
IVI 0
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Public Works Director
Randy DeVries, Water/W astewater Director
RE: Consideration of Accepting Report on Wastewater Treatment Facility
(WWTF) Administration Building Expansion Study
DATE: February 22,2006
This item was continued from the last Council Meeting. It was requested that the report be
reviewed in more depth prior to acceptance. We will be meeting with staff, elected officials
and Wold Architects on Thursday, February 23rd at 4 p.m. to review the plan.
We hope to have consensus at the City Council on accepting the report, and move toward
consideration of a contract with Wold Architects at the first meeting in March to continue
with the design of the project Weare hoping to start construction this fall.
- Printed on recycled paper -
~(aj
e
EDA 2005 Annual Report
e
e
~Lb)
Hutchinson
2005 Annual Report
Activity Report
. Business Retention & Expansion Program
. Downtown Redevelopment
. Industrial Park Development
. Marketing
. Hutchinson Downtown Association
Business Retention & Expansion
. 14 BR&E Visits in 2005
- Communicate appreciation
- Identify any issues
- Identify potential for expansion
TC Tool Engineering U.S. Posl Office
3D C-N-C Ashwilllndustries
Impressions Inc. Provesta
TEK Mechanical Services Steamswood
Hutchinson Mfg. Cenax
3M New Dimension Plating
Goebel Fixtures Lynn Card Co.
1
3(1)
Downtown Redevelopment
Hutchinson Hotel
- Downtown Master Plan
- Low interest loan
- Grants for signs &
awnings
Downtown Redevelopment
. Historic State Theater
- Downtown Master Plan
- Project Financing
. MBFC
. SWMF
- Redevelopment TIF
- Downtown loan program
- Grants
- Project support
~.1
~
.~~S "AA; ~
Downtown Redevelopment
, Liquor Hutch
- Assigned in June 2004
- Downtown Master Plan
- Coordinated project team
- Architect selection
- Researched locations
- Design input
- Site purchase
- Business relocation
- Coordinated wi Econo
- Project coordination
2
rLb)
NO TAX DOLLARS
NO TAX DOLLARS
Downtown Redevelopment
Downtown Streetscape
- Downtown Master Plan
- Public presentations
- Downtown survey
- Design input
- Assist engineering
- Coordinate wi business
- Coordinate wI contractor
- Liaison wI business
Downtown Redevelopment
Cornerstone Commons
- Business Plan
- Pro-formas
- Property Acquisition
- Bank Financing
- Redevelopment 11 F
- Downtown Loan
- Downtown Grants
- Business relocation
3
8(1)
Downtown Planning
Downtown Master Plan
;... $160,000 investment
;... $12.3 million + return
;... ROI = 75 to 1
(so far...)
,..._.__,.....:.~~'~ :="1
Downtown Investment, 2002 - 2005
EOA Loan & Grant Programs
;.. 53 low interest loans
:,.. 31 Storefront Matching Grants
:,.. 48 Sign & Awning Grants
Jorgensen Hotel private
State Theater private
Cornerstone Commons private
Liquor Hutch city
Downtown Streetscape city
Southwest Foundation private
$1,136,723
$79.291
$97,395
$1,000,000
$1,780,000
$2,125,000
$1.652,618
$1.442,965
$3 000 000
TOTAL
$12.313.992
Industrial Park Development
Property Management
- 94.3 acres
- Wetherell Property
- Stritesky Property
Business Start-ups &
Expansions
- Ashwilllndustries
. Business Plan
. Loan
- Company.X.
. 10.85 acre site
. 50,000 SF facility
4
&1)
Industrial Park Development
. JOBZ Obtained
- Researched "donor" cities
- Marshall & Tracy
- Coordinated wi DEED
- County, School Board &
City Council
- 51.9 acres obtained
- Played kBY role wi
Company "X"
'J?-;: tk:(
hOBL lJDBL
'J~.\~:~.f,~Q.r~ J~'J!i~~:~:
it<-;!
;0DBL ~~D BL
J~~~8.r~ J~k~~~~~
Industrial Park Development
Marketing
EDA Web-sile
'.."".~..,',.C.~. __~ .
~
". "',
Community Venture
Network
I --,,-....
... -...,. IiiiiiI
~ .,,-~ _._-_.~...-
>t,.'. , ~ . .
5
602)
Hutchinson Downtown Association
Provide staff suppon
52 members currently
Board reorganization &
By-law Update
Fanners Market
Popcorn Wagon
Downtown Events
- Picnic in the Park
- Main street Christmas
'l(-v-Vkilt,sol(
[~j;--:"I'-"-'Y;:;;3
"Jf/ttihilf~igl1!~~lf_?
JOO~H"'f.C~.:a~
.....oe'....'.....
EDA Loan & Grant Programs, 2005
Economic Development Loan Fund
- 1 loan $32,000
Downtown Loan Fund
- 1 loan $130,000
Storefront Revitalization Matching .Grants
- 6 matching grants $25,120
Sign & Awning Grants
- 9 grants $16,751
Downtown Loan Fund Status
, Currently managing 39 loans
. Total of $689,553 outstanding
, $529,646 cash available
. All loans are current
6
~U0
Internship Program
Sl. Cloud State University
- Erin Eberdt
- Jessica Evans
2006 Work Plan & Goals
BR&E visits
Downtown Post Office
Complete downtown projects
Promote additional downtown redevelopment
Complete Company "X" project
Recruit another business for industrial park
Provide support on Hwy 7 Project
Obtain grants
Provide outstanding customer service
Celebrate success!
Questions?
7
%cJ0
Proposed 2007 Budget Parameters
_rimarv Objectives:
. 3% maximum General Fund Levy Increase
. 4.5% maximum General Fund Budget Increase
. LGA:
1. Detennine projected LGA allocation for 2008.
a) If projected decrease in LGA for 2008, reduce use ofLGA in 2007 by half that amount and set
that aside in the rainy day account.
b) Ifno projected decrease in 2008 LGA, any remainder after reaching the General Fund 4.5%
increase limit will be used to lower the tax rate by 3%. Any additional remainder goes to the
rainy day fund.
. Programs to keep in budget:
1. Water Carnival funding
2. SW MN Foundation donation
3. Music in the parks
4. Arts & Craft Festival
5. Mosquito control
~:
~ Gather additional "out-state regional center" city [mancial comparison data.
~ Continue with 5 year budget forecasting. Update assumptions as necessary.
~ 2007 Tax Rate: Not a goal by itself because contingent totally on above items and tax capacity,
but hope to lower by 3 percentage points.
~ Future Tax Rate Goal - Lower tax rate to 40% by 2011.
~ All departments, including enterprise funds, start working with program budgeting to get
comfortable with it for the 2008 outcome budgeting process. Preferable to present 2007 budget
in program budget fonnat.
~ Budget Document - Add column for individual line item explanations & use footnotes at the
bottom of each page where longer explanations are needed.
~ Include description of capital purchases for each program/department.
~ Preliminary general fund budget presented by August 15th.
e
~ Initial enterprise fund budgets presented by September 1 st.
~ Investigate other budget presentation fonnats for use with the 2007 budget.
~Cc)
ORDINANCE NO. 06-0431
e
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION
~3 1.31 PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION.
(A) Establishment.
(1) A Public Arts Commission is hereby established.
(B) Purpose.
The purpose of the Public Arts Commission shall include but not be limited to:
(1) Establishing standards and guidelines for donations of public art to the City of Hutchinson;
(2) Establishing the procedure for the maintenance of gifts of public art;
(3) Evaluating funding sources, including public funding, for arts projects;
(3) Determining the process of accepting or declining gifts of public art;
(4) Establishing guidelines for the branding, naming and placard placement on gifts of public art; and
(5) Ensuring that obsolete gifts of public art are properly disposed of;
e
(6) Providing forums to discuss public arts and/or architecture influences of projects.
(C)
Composition.
(1) The Commission shall be composed offive members and one of whom shall be a member ofthe City
Council and designated by the City Council. The Commission shall be active for a period of 18 months.
The Director ofPlanninglZoninglBuilding, the Director ofParkslRecreationlCommunity Education, and
the Director of Economic Development Authority shall be ex-officio members.
(D) Duties.
(1) The Public Arts Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council for the City and shall
make recommendations to the City Council on issues regarding public art within the city limits.
Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of March, 2006.
A ITEST:
Mayor Steven W. Cook
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrat()r
e
qLc)
e
e
e
J. (JI(J{J'/ 51(/ c!r
MOSQUITO CONTROL SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 18th day of January 2006, between the City of
Hutchinson, hereinafter called 'Customer", and Professional Mosquito Control, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, herinafter called "Contractor", witnesseth:
1. SERVICES. The Contractor agrees to furnish all materials, equipment, and labor necessary
to perform for the Customer, in good and businesslike manner, the following specified
services:
Comprehensive Larval Control Study
2. COMPENSATION. The Customer will pay the Contractor, who will accept in full payment for
all services, the sum of this contract not to exceed $2,000. Two Thousand dollars, payable as
follows:
Terms:
Net 30 days from date of completion
No additional work is to be done without authorization from The Customer.
3. TERM. The Contractor is to perform this agreement during a period from approximately
May 2006 to September 2006
4. TERRITORY. The territory covered by this agreement shall be limited to:
City of Hutchinson - City Limits
5. SCOPE OF SERVICE. This outdoor pest control service is being performed specifically to
reduce nuisance mosquitoes. The Contractor in no way claims to reduce or minimize the
population of disease causing mosquitoes or makes any claims of disease prevention. These
diseases may include West Nile, Encephalitis, and any other disease which may be
transmitted by mosquitoes.
5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Contractor shall act as an independent contractor insofar
as the performance of services hereunder is concerned. To that end, the Contractor shall
secure any and all permits and licenses that may be required to perform said services herein
contemplated and shall comply with all federal and state laws, rules and regulations required
to performing the above mentioned services. The Customer shall make available all local, city
and county permits, necessary and Contractor shall make reports that shall be required by
any federal, state, county, or municipal law, ordinance, rule or regulation.
6. CONTRACTORS LICENSED. The contractor will provide the Customer with a current copy
of the Contractor's Commercial Pesticide Applicators License if requested by the Customer.
7. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain a minumum of $1,000,000 in
liability insurance during the term of this Agreement, and will provide the Customer with a
certificate of insurance, if requested, that certifies that the {;ontractor has the type of insurance
in the amounts indicated in force during the time the services will be performed.
qLb)
.,
e
e
e
8. PAYMENT DEFAULT. In the event the Customer fails to pay any installment of the contract
price when due, Contractor may, at its sole discretion, cease further services under this
agreement and recover from the Customer, the greater of "Contractor's cost" or the "Value of
Services Rendered" prior to cessation and anticipated profit to have been earned in the
performance of the entire contract.
9. NOTICES. All notices regarding this agreement given or so sent hereunder shall be sent by
United States Mail, certified with retum receipt requested, to the respective parties at the
addresses set forth on the signature page hereof or to such other address as the parties shall
designate in writing from time to time.
10. AUTHORITY. Due to potential drift involved with mosquito spraying, the Customer grants to
the Contractor, authority to spray all portions of the property, both public and private, as
deemed necessary by the Contractor. The Customer warrants to Contractor that it has the
authority to enter into this contract and that this contract has been approved by any and all
persons required by any city ordinance, state statue, or other governmental regulations.
CUSTOMER:
Name:
Address:
City of Hutchinson
1400 Adams Street
Hutchinson, MN 55038
By
Title
Print Name:
CONTRACTOR:
Name:
Professional Mosquito Control, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
Address:
20061 Edison Circle East
Clearwater, MN 55320
By
Brian J. Musech, President - Commercial Applicator
9Lb)
01- ,'.
I
5~mr17
e
MOSQUITO CONTROL SERVICE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 18th day of January 2006, between the City of
Hutchinson, hereinafter called "Customer", and Professional Mosquito Control, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, herinafter called 'Contractor", witnesseth:
1. SERVICES. The Contractor agrees to furnish all materials, equipment, and labor necessary
to perform for the Customer, in good and businesslike manner, the following specified
services:
Weekly spraying for adutt mosquitoes
using truck mount ulv control treatment
(11-16 treatment annually). $2,100 per treatment
$23,100 . $33,600
Weekly spraying for adutt mosquitoes using Barrier Control
(11-16 treatments annually). $250 per treatment
$2,760 - $4,000
2. COMPENSATION. The Customer will pay the Contractor, who will accept in full payment for
all services, the sum of this contract not to exceed $37,600. Thirty Seven Thousand Six
Hundred dollars, payable as follows:
Terms:
Monthly billing, net 10th for actual work performed.
No additional work is to be done without authorization from The Customer.
tit 3. TERM. The Contractor is to perform this agreement during a period from approximately
May 2006 to September 2006
4. TERRITORY. The territory covered by this agreement shall be limited to:
City of Hutchinson - City Limits
5. SCOPE OF SERVICE This outdoor pest control service is being performed specifically to
reduce nuisance mosquitoes. The Contractor in no way claims to reduce or minimize the
population of disease causing mosquitoes or makes any claims of disease prevention. These
diseases may include West Nile, Encephalitis, and any other disease which may be
transmitted by mosquitoes.
5. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. The Contractor shall act as an independent contractor insofar
as the performance of services hereunder is concemed. To that end, the Contractor shall
secure any and all permits and licenses that may be required to perform said services herein
contemplated and shall comply with all federal and state laws, rules and regulations required
to performing the above mentioned services. The Customer shall make available all local, city
and county permits, necessary and Contractor shall make reports that shall be required by
any federal, state, county, or municipal law, ordinance, rule or regulation.
e
6. CONTRACTORS LICENSED. The contractor will provide the Customer with a current copy
of the Contractor's Commercial Pesticide Applicators License if requested by the Customer.
~LbJ
'.
..
e
e
e
7. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall procure and maintain a minumum of $1 ,000,000 in
liability insurance during the term of this Agreement, and will provide the Customer with a
certificate of insurance, if requested, that certifies that the contractor has the type of insurance
in the amounts indicated in force during the time the services will be performed.
8. PAYMENT DEFAULT. In the event the Customer fails to pay any installment of the contract
price when due, Contractor may, at its sole discretion, cease further services under this
agreement and recover from the Customer, the greater of "Contractor's cost" or the "Value of
Services Rendered" prior to cessation and anticipated profit to have been eamed in the
performance of the entire contract.
9. NOTICES. All notices regarding this agreement given or so sent hereunder shall be sent by
United States Mail, certified with return receipt requested, to the respective parties at the
addresses set forth on the signature page hereof or to such other address as the parties shall
designate in writing from time to time.
10. AUTHORITY. Due to potential drift involved with mosquito spraying, the Customer grants to
the Contractor, authority to spray all portions of the property, both public and private, as
deemed necessary by the Contractor. The Customer warrants to Contractor that it has the
authority to enter into this contract and that this contract has been approved by any and all
persons required by any city ordinance, state statue, or other governmental regulations.
CUSTOMER:
Name:
Address:
City of Hutchinson
1400 Adams Street
Hutchinson, MN 55038
By
Title
Print Name:
CONTRACTOR:
Name:
Professional Mosquito Control, Inc., a Minnesota corporation
Address:
20061 Edison Circle East
Clearwater, MN 55320
By
Brian J. Musech, President - Commercial Applicator
~Lbj
e
e
Barry Dixon
16W 455 S. Frontage Rd, Suite 300
Burr Ridge, IL 60527
February 21, 2006
Mr. Kent Exner, PE
City Engineer
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522
RE: Hutchinson downtown decorative street lighting
Mr. Exner,
In appreciation for your past business, and honoring our partnership, Holophane would
like to donate (4) Granville luminaires on North Yorkshire aluminum poles. Part
number: GVU15AHPMAB3NNUH and NY14F5/17-CA/BK.
Please accept this on behalf of Holophane as we look forward to more continued growth
together.
Best regards,
Barry Dixon
Regional Sales Vice President
Holophane and American Electric Lighting
'IO(~)
LEADER IN UGIITlNG SOLUTIONS
An .cultyBrandsCompany
~
-
.<:
01
as
.<:
1il
c:
E
o
.s
~
to "'"
~
GVU1SAHPMAB3NNU H
ORA.W1NGI:
TSG 000994
TlGOIlAWWS. 'lIItEJOAf'PftOlIED,lPW.LlIECONl THIiOONPl..ETE IPEClf'\C.A.T1Ol'I F(Rnc......~.T08E FI.Illtft:HEC .vHOU:lf"tWll!:;ON1l1e.~ItOTEDAlIO'Jt.A"""0l''''''''''''~llIAytlEtl.fIPlJU).aJTCN.YN'TVI:1#'f'fItO.IN.''''THI!
C:U.ST~~~ONPO...I!OIIDUtII"'/lIjClt()lll.ItQ,.TTDFlATf."~WI..l.M~~nlRACHNtCi'IOI'IIICl.TIJM)I!"TO.....tt/-ITHI!!iI'!:l..l!~, nuPNn"IITHl!~OI"tD..[JOtW,I!MD13~llUIJ!CTTO~l..-oN
DBrU.NDMDlA]IIj DPllEl:llCONCII1'1l,:Ij THATIT'M.L.J.IOTRUISl~YOlll~YIN>>IY1lriAY~AL TOOUlltINTVlBn,NlOC>>IlV...COfoIttEC11(JItWITHW,lVUt..'(JII;fIIHEDIrYHa..Of'IWIE.T
PAGE: 1 of 2
-l 01'-S" I-
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson, MN
ORDER #:
REVISION: 1
DRAWN:ACH
TYPE:
REVISION DATE: 02-21-06
ORIGIN DATE: 02-07-06
..
e
e
e
R55APPYRV I CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By Check Number AP Payment Register with Voids
Check Date 0211512006 -
Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount
02/1512006 PK 1 34558 . 122746 INFILCO DEGREMONT 62,009.00
02115/2006 PK 134559 122745 MN PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY 20,695.69
02115/2006 PK 1 34560 120861 SKYVIEW DAIRY INC 56,454.87
139,159.56
Account Nu #
139,159.56
e
Void Amou
e
e
R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON .
By Check Number AP Payment Reqister with Voids
Check Date 02/21/2006 -
Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount
02/2112006 PK 134561 . 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 860
860
Account Nu
860
.
Void Amou
;
.
.
.
PAYROLL DATE:
Period Ending Date:
February 17, 2006
February 11, 2006
e
FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY. ELECTRONIC TRANSFER
TO STATE AND IRS
DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE
AMOUNT
ACCT#
NAME
DESCRIPTION
$21,389.09
9995.2034 WITH. TAX Employee Contribution - Federal Tax
ACCOUNT
9995.2240 Employee Contribution - Soc. Secur~y
$11,514.97
$3,286.21
9995.2242. Employee Contribution - Medicare
$36,1 90.27 Sub-Total - Employee Contribution
$11,514.97 9995.2240 Employer Contribution - Social Security
$3,286.21 9995.2242 Employer Contribution - Medicare Per Journal Entries Difference
Fica $ 23,029.94
$14,801.18 Sub-Total - Employer Contribution Medicare $ 6,572.42
W~hholding $ 21 ,389.09
$50,991.45 Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account Total $ 50,991.45 $0.00
~ 9995.2035 MN DEPT OF REVENUE State Tax $ 9,441.43 $0.00
$13,222.26 9995.2241 PERA Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
$15,784.26 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
$29,006.52 Sub-Total - PERA
$15.86 9995.2243 PERA-DCP Employee Contribution - Pension Plan
$15.86 9995.2241 Employer Contribution - Pension Plan
Para $ 29,022.38
$31.72 Sub - Total - DCP DCP $ 15.86
$29,038.24 GRAND TOTAL - PERA Total $ 29,038.24 $0.00
Finance Director Approval
e
R55APPYRV CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Bv Check Number AP Payment Register with Voids
Check Date 02/22/2006 -
Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount
02/2212006 PK 134562 . 101919 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. 166.55
02/22/2006 PK 134563 121914 AULlCK 3,500.00
02122/2006 PK 134564 119212 BLOCK FARMS & TRUCKING 2,940.00
0212212006 PK 134565 122755 CEDAR DECKER 15,000.00
02/2212006 PK 134566 102360 ERLANDSON, BEN 35.00
02122/2006 PK 134567 101872 H.R.L.A.P.R. 314.13
02/2212006 PK 134568 122273 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 989.25
0212212006 PK 134569 102633 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF . 7,998.49
02/2212006 PK 134570 102635 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 722.02
02/2212006 PK 134571 101873 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 3,916.53
02/2212006 PK 134572 101876 ING LIFE & ANN CO. 1,160.00
02/22/2006 PK 134573 104936 MACA 230.00
02/22/2006 PK 134574 102573 tv1CLEOD COOP POWER 2,146.88
02/22/2006 PK 134575 103783 tv1CLEOD PUBLISHING INC 122.00
0212212006 PK 134576 102425 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. 1,801.85
02/2212006 PK 134577 102449 MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PAYMEN 257.03
02/2212006 PK 134578 101875 ORCHARD TRUST COMPANY, LLC 300.00
02/22/2006 PK 134579 102096 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS 30.00
02/22/2006 PK 134580 102052 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. 5,859.80
02/2212006 PK 134581 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 13,899.48
02/2212006 PK 134582 105122 WASTE MANAGEMENT 45,960.74
02/22/2006 PK 134583 11 5390 WOODS, CANDICE 417.30
107,767.05
Account Nu
.107,767.05
e
e
.
e
e
e
R55APPYRVI CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By Check Number AP Payment Register with Voids
Check Date 02/28/2006 -
Ck Date Type Check # Vendor Name Amount
02/28/2006 PK 134584 . 102759 AARP 330.00
02/28/2006 PK 134585 102126 ACE HARDWARE 68.84
02/28/2006 PK 134586 1 02217 AEM MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC 288.82
02/28/2006 PK 134587 116423 AMENT, ADAM 150.00
02/28/2006 PK 134588 101847 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 57.51
02/28/2006 PK 134589 101844 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN 235.00
02/28/2006 PK 134590 101943 ANALYTICAL PRODUCTS GROUP 190.00
02/28/2006 PK 134591 122763 ANDERSON, NATHAN 31.20
02/2812006 PK 134592 105204 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE INC 124.92
02/28/2006 PK 134593 102273 ARNOLD'S OF GLENCOE 13,046.22
02/28/2006 PK 134594 111041 ARROW TERMINAL LLC 16.97
02/28/2006 PK 134595 102260 ASHBROOK SIMON HARTLEY OPERATI 121.93
02/28/2006 PK 134596 103032 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO 183.90
02/28/2006 PK 134597 121810 AT&T 26.04
02/28/2006 PK 134598 102303 AUGUSTA BUILDING CORP 17,758.28
02/28/2006 PK 134599 104077 B & C PLBG & HTG INC. 25.13
02/28/2006 PK J 34600 102367 BELlBOY CORP 396.00
02/28/2006 PK 134601 105557 BENNETT MATERIAL HANDLING 12.886.50
02/28/2006 PK 134602 101916 BERNICK COMPANIES, THE 241.20
02/28/2006 PK 134603 120738 BERTELSON'S 333.74
02/28/2006 PK 134604 103136 BEST WESTERN MAPLEWOOD INN 62.84
02/28/2006 PK 134605 104427 BEST WESTERN-VICTORIAN INN 66.14
02/28/2006 PK 134606 119212 BLOCK FARMS & TRUCKING 2,548.00
02/28/2006 PK 134607 101987 BRANDON TIRE CO 50.30
02/28/2006 PK 134608 103349 BRANDT GARMET LETTERING 164.20
02/28/2006 PK 134609 102752 BRAUN INTERTEC CORP 660.00
02/28/2006 PK 134610 102136 BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS 1,437.74
02/28/2006 PK 134611 102456 C & L DISTRIBUTING 32,661.75
02/2812006 PK 134612 102086 CADD/ENGINEERING SUPPLY 97.11
02/2812006 PK 134613 104512 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLlE 107.70
02/28/2006 PK 134614 120432 CARLOS CREEK WINERY 648.00
02/28/2006 PK 134615 103100 CARTER, RON 80.00
02/2812006 PK 134616 104391 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS 183.37
02/2812006 PK 134617 102253 CENTRAL MCGOWAN 60.67
02/28/2006 PK 134618 102060 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 100.00
02128/2006 PK 134619 102213 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 67.83
02/28/2006 PK 134620 121268 COOPER, BECCA 97.52
02/28/2006 PK 134621 102484 CORPORATE EXPRESS 767.76
02/28/2006 PK 134622 105648 COUNTRY INN & SUITES 244.18
02/28/2006 PK 134623 102289 CROW RIVER GLASS 102.32
02/28/2006 PK 134624 102121 CROW RIVER VET CLINIC 296.46
02/28/2006 PK 134625 103815 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP 2,127.45
02/28/2006 PK 134626 104469 CZECH,RANDY 80.00
02/28/2006 PK 134627 102488 DAY DISTRIBUTING 7,373.02
02/2812006 PK 134628 104571 DELACORE RESOURCES 2,125.00
02/28/2006 PK 134629 121697 DIMLER, KYLE 95.58
02/28/2006 PK 134630 102710 DOMINO'S PIZZA 22.21
02/28/2006 PK 134631 102275 DPC INDUSTRIES INC 618.34
e
e
e
02/28/2006 PK 134632 113181 DROP-N-GO SHIPPING, INC 131.38
02/28/2006 PK 134633 102647 DYNA SYSTEMS 569.13
02/28/2006 PK 134634 104415 EARTH TECH 12,433.87
02/28/2006 PK 134635 122792 EARTHLY DELIGHTS, LTD. 812.33
02/2812006 PK 134636 102495 EBERT,PAT .5.00
02/28/2006 PK 134637 102726 ECOLAB PEST ELlM 106.50
02/28/2006 PK 134638 105555 EHLERS & ASSOC 87.50
02/28/2006 PK 134639 120767 EXNER, KENT 80.10
02/28/2006 PK 134640 11 0034 EXTREME BEVERAGE 160.00
02/28/2006 PK 134641 102223 FARM-RITE EQUIPMENT 465.97
02/2812006 PK 134642 104137 FASTENAL COMPANY 76.74
02/28/2006 PK 134643 118463 FIRST CLASS BUILDERS 270.00
0212812006 PK 134644 107529 FLEET COMPUTING INTERNATIONAL 600.00
02/28/2006 PK 134645 122764 FREDRICK, MARL YS 11.00
02/28/2006 PK 134646 117085 FREMONT INDUSTRIES, INC 864.78
02/28/2006 PK 134647 112129 FULLER & D'ALBERT INC 72.03
02/28/2006 PK 134648 122750 GAPP, NANCY 40.00
02/2812006 PK 134649 103743 GE CAPITAL 38.62
02/28/2006 PK 134650 103340 GEB ELECTRICAL INC 299.00
02/28/2006 PK 134651 105021 GENERAL TRADING CO 14.25
02/28/2006 PK 134652 103972 GIFFERSON, TOM 150.00
02/2812006 PK 134653 102999 GODFATHER'S PIZZA 312.01
02/2812006 PK 134654 102087 GRAINGER PARTS OPERATIONS 479.25
02/28/2006 PK 134655 101874 GRIGGS & COOPER & CO 13,455.14
02/28/2006 PK 134656 122781 GUS WURDELL & RASKE BLDG. SYST 4,779.00
02/28/2006 PK 134657 102025 H&L MESABI 741.95
02/28/2006 PK 134658 102529 HACH COMPANY 523.43
02/28/2006 PK 134659 102451 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE 1,075.10
02/28/2006 PK 134660 122765 HEITZ, JOHN 40.00
02/2812006 PK 134661 118678 HELGET, JIM 80.00
02/28/2006 PK 134662 103240 HEMMAH, KATHY 47.55
02/28/2006 PK 134663 104883 HENKE FLOOR CARE 3,500.00
02/28/2006 PK 134664 102701 HENRY'S WATERWORKS INC 778.40
02/2812006 PK 134665 1 02531 HENRYS FOODS INC 633.67
02/2812006 PK 134666 116866 HEWLETT-PACKARD CO 1,438.82
02/2812006 PK 134667 102518 HILLYARD FLOOR CARElHUTCHINSON 713.51
02/2812006 PK 134668 102119 HOLT MOTORS INC 28.05
02/28/2006 PK 134669 119714 HOWELL, DEB 40.00
02/2812006 PK 134670 114896 HUGHES,TRESSA 203.00
02/28/2006 PK 134671 102139 HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COM 1,500.00
02/28/2006 PK 134672 102319 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE 447.00
02/28/2006 PK 134673 122063 HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE 3,434.00
02/28/2006 PK 134674 102533 HUTCHINSON CONVENTION & VISITO 5,393.05
02/28/2006 PK 134675 117983 HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN ASSOC 200.00
02/28/2006 PK 134676 115652 HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER 65.00
02/28/2006 PK 134677 101994 HUTCHINSON JAYCEES 2,000.00
02/28/2006 PK 134678 102541 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE CO 2,498.26
02/28/2006 PK 134679 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 170,000.00
02/28/2006 PK 134680 102038 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 427.02
02/28/2006 PK 134681 102072 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 29,661.00
02/28/2006 PK 134682 103099 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF 2,998.04
02/28/2006 PK 134683 109221 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF POLICE DEP 242.35
.
e
e
e
e
e
02/28/2006 PK 134684 103079 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERI 122.55
02/28/2006 PK 1 34685 122276 ICENHOWER, NICHOLAS 28.40
02/2812006 PK 134686 102272 INDIAN HEAD SPECIALTY CO 51.90
02/28/2006 PK 134687 122751 INDUSTRIAL FABRICS CORP. 5,892.81
02/28/2006 PK 134688 121666 INVENTORY TRADING CO. 229.75
02/28/2006 PK 134689 102062 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT 510.94
02/28/2006 PK 134690 102554 JERABEK MACHINE SERV 9.81
02/28/2006 PK 134691 102652 JERRYS TRANSMISSION 2,836.79
02/28/2006 PK 134692 101938 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 21,830.36
02/28/2006 PK 134693 102346 JOHNSON, LEONARD G. 812.76
02/28/2006 PK 134694 102555 JUUL CONTRACTING CO 37.00
02/28/2006 PK 134695 120300 KIESS OIL CO 461.87
02/28/2006 PK 134696 105154 KILIAN, ERIC 645.00
02/28/2006 PK 134697 105245 KLEMP WISCHNACK, JULIE 189.75
02/28/2006 PK 134698 121386 KRISTICO, INC 440.00
02/28/2006 PK 134699 121368 KURTH,RYAN 60.00
02/28/2006 PK 134700 102561 L & P SUPPLY CO 1,074.32
02/28/2006 PK 134701 101976 LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORP 3,352.62
02/28/2006 PK 134702 105525 LANO EQUIPMENT OF NORWOOD 85.62
02/28/2006 PK 134703 103635 LEHN, GAIL 40.00
02/28/2006 PK 134704 121186 LEONARD, STREET & DEINARD 3,772.44
02/2812006 PK 134705 122766 L1EPKES WALLCOVERING 1,704.00
02/28/2006 PK 134706 101964 LOCHER BROTHERS INC 17,428.45
02/28/2006 PK 134707 102564 LOGIS 34,263.98
02/28/2006 PK 134708 102145 M-R SIGN 211.08
02/28/2006 PK 134709 120802 M. AMUNDSON LLP 285.76
02/28/2006 PK 134710 102571 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC 344.63
02/28/2006 PK 134711 102573 MCLEOD COOP POWER 800.00
02/28/2006 PK 134712 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 135.00
02/28/2006 PK 134713 102489 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA 200.00
02/2812006 PK 134714 103046 MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER 175.00
02/28/2006 PK 134715 113893 MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER 4.40
02/28/2006 PK 134716 122584 MEEDS, SHARON 523.70
02/28/2006 PK 134717 112400 MENARDS - HUTCHINSON 750.58
02/2812006 PK 134718 104034 MESSNER, KEITH 5.00
02/28/2006 PK 134719 107547 MIES MIKE 60.00
02/28/2006 PK 134720 118454 MILLS, HOLLY 18.00
02/28/2006 PK 134721 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 53.50
02/28/2006 PK 134722 101992 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 285.00
02/28/2006 PK 134723 101947 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR & INDU 35.00
02/28/2006 PK 134724 101947 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR & INDU 35.00
02/28/2006 PK 134725 102653 MINNESOTA DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICL 139.00
02/28/2006 PK 134726 102846 MINNESOTA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATI 182.25
02/28/2006 PK 134727 103504 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSC. 125.00
02/28/2006 PK 134728 105157 MINNESOTA SHREDDING 111.90
02/28/2006 PK 134729 102570 MINNESOTA SPORTS FEDERATION 1,650.00
02/28/2006 PK 134730 116938 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE RESCUE SC 320.00
02/28/2006 PK 134731 122286 MINNESOTA TRUCK LEASING INC 4,137.54
02128/2006 PK 134732 102583 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAB 1,390.50
02/28/2006 PK 134733 102655 MODERN MAZDA 143.90
02/28/2006 PK 134734 122767 MOHR, BRIAN 28.40
02/28/2006 PK 134735 103272 MUETZEL, BRUCE 40.00
e
e
e
02/28/2006 PK 134736 102590 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. 12,372.46
02/28/2006 PK 134737 102650 NCL 13.88
02/28/2006 PK 134738 103014 NORTHERN BUSINESS PRODUCTS 209.53
02/28/2006 PK 134739 102591 NORTHERN STATES SUPPLY INC 46.12
02/28/2006 PK 134740 102791 NSPE 260.00
02/28/2006 PK 134741 120210 O'FALLON, CAITLIN 8.57
02/28/2006 PK 134742 122214 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 122.60
02/28/2006 PK 134743 119358 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 184.29
02/28/2006 PK 134744 102592 OLSON'S LOCKSMITH 29.82
02/28/2006 PK 134745 110194 OLSON, BRAD 250.00
02/28/2006 PK 134746 120790 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC 146.40
02/28/2006 PK 134747 122782 OPERATIONS GROUP 7,500.00
02/28/2006 PK 134748 102483 OTTO ASSOCIATES 71.00
02/28/2006 PK 134749 103074 PARTIES PLUS 32.74
02/28/2006 PK 134750 108859 PARTS ASSOCIATES INC 212.59
02/2812006 PK 134751 102187 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 5,766.85
02/28/2006 PK 134752 122778 PERFECT CHOICE SERVICES 29.82
0212812006 PK 134753 101853 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 10,057.28
02/28/2006 PK 134754 121711 PIEHL, WILLIAM OR JOYCE 78.00
02/2812006 PK 134755 102167 PITNEY BOWES 1 ,458.00
02/28/2006 PK 134756 102593 PLOTZ, GARY D. 88.46
02/28/2006 PK 134757 104888 POLICE MARKSMAN, THE 18.95
02/28/2006 PK 134758 102445 POSTMASTER 160.00
02/28/2006 PK 134759 103919 POWDER RIDGE SKI CORP 7,428.00
02/2812006 PK 134760 122768 POWERS, VICKY 40.00
02/28/2006 PK 134761 102493 PREMIER TECH PACKAGING 2,620.60
02/28/2006 PK 134762 120474 PRIDE SOLUTIONS, INC 252.00
02/28/2006 PK 134763 102157 PRINCE OF PEACE SENIOR APT. IN 7,948.75
02/28/2006 PK 134764 102598 QUADE ELECTRIC 410.22
02/28/2006 PK 134765 121518 QWEST 62.59
02/28/2006 PK 134766 117434 R & J TOURS, INC. 311.76
02/28/2006 PK 134767 102604 R & R SPECIALTIES INC 277.77
02/2812006 PK 134768 102205 R.J.L. TRANSFER 1 ,253.80
02/28/2006 PK 134769 102424 RADIO SHACK 153.33
02/28/2006 PK 134770 113326 RAININ INSTRUMENT, LLC 190.45
02/28/2006 PK 134771 114718 RBSCOTT EQUIPMENT 514.59
02/28/2006 PK 134772 122752 REDMAN, KATHY 200.00
02/28/2006 PK 134773 121176 REINER ENTERPRISES, INC 2,017.64
02/28/2006 PK 134774 121476 ROADTECH 2,069.27
02/28/2006 PK 134775 102021 RODEBERG, JOHN 56.38
02/28/2006 PK 134776 122769 RODEBERG,NANCY 25.00
02/28/2006 PK 134777 103049 ROTO ROOTER 90.00
02/28/2006 PK 134778 121677 RUCKS, CAMERON D. 1,965.05
02/28/2006 PK 134779 119208 RUNKE,DOREEN 280.00
02/28/2006 PK 134780 102225 RUNNING'S SUPPLY 505.51
02/28/2006 PK 134781 102436 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 404.62
02/28/2006 PK 134782 112412 SARGENT, DAN 107.69
02/28/2006 PK 134783 119346 SCAT ENGINEERING 882.58
02/28/2006 PK 134764 122770 SCHATZ CONSTRUCTION, INC 416.68
02/28/2006 PK 134785 102606 SCHMELING OIL CO 96.81
02/28/2006 PK 134786 109794 SEARS 180.99
02/28/2006 PK 134787 101892 SEH 1,118.62
'.
.
.
e
e
e
02/2812006 PK 1 34788 102637 SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY 334.68
02/28/2006 PK 134789 120410 SPECIALTY WINES 776.00
02/2812006 PK 134790 102749 SR. ADVISORY BOARD 41.00
02/28/2006 PK 134791 102242 SRF CONSULTING GROUP 2,091.85
02/28/2006 PK 134792 102747 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC 3,246.46
02/28/2006 PK 134793 102612 STANDARD PRINTING 57.62
02/28/2006 PK 134794 122382 STAR TRIBUNE 352.35
02/28/2006 PK 134795 119799 STEVE'S OK SERVICES 217.00
02/28/2006 PK 134796 104977 STOCKMAN, JACKIE 14.00
02/28/2006 PK 134797 102671 STOTTS, CASEY 107.69
02/28/2006 PK 134798 104979 STRAKA, JESSE 103.84
02/28/2006 PK 134799 120795 SUPER GROUP PACKAGING & DISTRI 2,790.04
02/28/2006 PK 134800 121020 TAPS-LYLE SCHROEDER 20.00
02/28/2006 PK 134801 102396 THECO INC. 2,862.40
02/28/2006 PK 134802 103096 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEM 75.35
02/28/2006 PK 134803 119228 TRAFFIC SAFETY BRACKETS 345.98
02/28/2006 PK 134804 120205 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY APPAREL 62.48
02/28/2006 PK 134805 102447 TRICOUNTY ELECTRIC MOTOR SERVI 468.85
02/28/2006 PK 1 34806 119214 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS I 181.68
02/28/2006 PK 134807 102619 TWO WAY COMM INC 10.60
02/28/2006 PK 1 34808 102624 UNITED BUILDING CENTERS 450.89
02/28/2006 PK 134809 103210 USA BLUE BOOK 1,596.41
02/28/2006 PK 134810 119913 USFILTER DAVIS PRODUCTS 7,737.16
02/28/2006 PK 134811 102069 VESSCOINC 86.58
02/28/2006 PK 134812 101974 VIKING BEER 3,876.85
02/28/2006 PK 134813 102132 VIKING COCA COLA 586.40
02/28/2006 PK 134814 101857 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 60.61
02/28/2006 PK 134815 122771 WATSON, SHARON 80.00
02/28/2006 PK 134816 102165 WELCOME NEIGHBOR 60.00
02/28/2006 PK 134817 110738 WESTMOR INDUSTRIES, LLC 646.54
02/28/2006 PK 134818 102452 WINE MERCHANTS INC 272.50
02/28/2006 PK 134819 115390 WOODS, CANDICE 123.63
02/28/2006 PK 134820 102632 XEROX CORP 284.60
02/2812006 PK 134821 105571 ZEP MANUFACTURING CO 545.00
02/28/2006 PK 134822 102634 ZIEGLER INC 29,512.75
603,649.40
Account Nu
603,649.40
e
e
e
ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS
2-28-06
e
WATER/SEWER MN DEPT OF REVENUE-USE TAX $10180.00
GENERAL MN DEPT OF REVENUE-SALES TAX $ 486.00
H.A.T.S MN DEPT OF REVENUE-FUEL TAX $1253.20
LIQUOR MN DEPT OF REVENUE-AUG. SALES TX $23790.00
e
e