PC Packet 01.16.18
AGENDA
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday,January 16, 2018
5:30 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.CONSENT AGENDA
A.CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES DATED October 17, 2017
4.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN FOR AMULTI-TENANT RETAIL
BUILDING AND VARIANCE TO REDUCE PARKING STALL SIZEIN A
C-4ZONING DISTRICT,LOCATED AT 1094 HWY 15 S.
5.NEW BUSINESS
6.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7.COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
A.Upcoming Meetings
8.ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday,October 17, 2017
5:30 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER 5:30P.M.
The October 17, 2017Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Fahey
at 5:30p.m. Members in bold were present Chair Fahey,Vice Chair Wick,Commissioner
Garberg,Commissioner Wirt, Commissioner Lofdahl,Commissioner Hantge and
Commissioner Forcier. Also present were Dan Jochum,City Planner,John Olson, City
PublicWorks,John Paulson, City Environmental Specialist,Marc Sebora,City Attorney
and Andrea Schwartz, City of Hutchinson Permit Technician
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.CONSENT AGENDA
A.CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES DATED September 19, 2017.
Motion by Commissioner Lofdahl, Second by Commissioner Hantge.Motion
approved.
Motion to Approve–Motion to Reject
4.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LIGHT
MANUFACTURING OF AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET PARTS IN AN I/C
ZONING DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 760 AIRPORT RD.
Dan Jochum, City Planner addressed the Commission.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the application as outlined in the Commission’s packets.
One of the conditions Planning Staff would like to see would be to pave the lot
and driveway to the building. This was a condition that was put on the previous
“Sky Dive” operation that was never followed through. The applicant will be
given until next summer to get the paving project completed.
This building is not on City water and sewer.
It was noted that the “taxi service” runway was disconnected from the Airport.
Added condition from Planning Staff are as follows:
Obtain any necessary permits
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
October 17, 2017
Page 2
Paving parking lot and driveway by June 30, 2018
Septic system and well be operated per the rules set by the Stateand
McLeod County
Applicant to be aware there is a municipal airport operating on adjacent
property and the applicant cannot interfere with airport operations in any
way and any potential use of the airport property to the rear would require
legal agreement in the form of a lease or easement with the airport.
The apartment or sleeping room cannot be used as an apartment as the
zoning does not allow in this district.
Dennis Goebel –applicant-clarified that he is looking at purchasing 2.5 acres of
the parcel, not the entire lot. Mr. Jochum noted that this property should be split
and that could be taken care of internally.
Motion by Commissioner Lofdahl,second by Commissioner Wirtto close hearing
at 5:39p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Lofdahlto approvewith staff recommendations.
Second by Commissioner Hantge. Motion approved. Item will be on City Council
consent agenda on 10/24/2017.
Motion to close hearing –Motion to approve with staff recommendations–Motion to reject
5.NEW BUSINESS
6.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
7.COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
A.Question to consider an attendance policy? If a quorum is not met it is hard to meet
the 60 day rule and discourteous to the applicant.
B.Upcoming Meetings
Dan Jochum noted that we have noapplicationsfor theNovemberPlanning
Commission meetingat this time.There has been talk of more projects coming up
next year.
8.ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Hantge, Second by Commissioner Lofdahlto adjourn at
5:43p.m.
DIRECTORS REPORT –PLANNING DEPARTMENT
To:Hutchinson Planning Commission
From:Dan Jochum, AICP and City of Hutchinson Planning Staff
Date:January 11,2018forJanuary 16,2018, Planning Commission Meeting
Application:CONSIDERATION OFREQUEST FOR ASITE PLAN REVIEWANDVARIANCE FOR
THE SHOPS AT HUTCHLOCATED AT 1094HIGHWAY 15 SOUTH, HUTCHINSON.
Applicant:John Bell.–Klodt Incorporated.
SITE PLAN REVIEWANDVARIANCE
Brief Description
The applicant has submitted applications for a site plan review and variance for the development of anew
commercial development located at 1094Highway 15 South, Hutchinson(former KFC site).The project will
feature just over 8,000 square feet of commercialspace and a drive through for one of the tenants. A variance
has been requested for the parking stall size in the middle parking aisles,to reduce from the required 20’length
to 19’in length.
Site Plan Review and Variance
Shops at Hutch–1094Highway 15 So., Hutchinson.
Planning Commission –1-16-18
Page 2
GENERAL INFORMATION
Existing Zoning:C-4 Fringe Commercial District
Property Location:1094Highway 15 South, Hutchinson.
Lot Size:1.2Acres
Existing Land Use:Vacant Commercial Property –former Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC)
Adjacent Land Use:Commercial Properties
Adjacent Zoning:C-4 Fringe Commercial District
Comprehensive Plan:Commercial
Zoning History:Zoned C-4 since the property was originally developed in the early 1980s
Applicable
Regulations:City Code of Ordinances Sections154.172(variance) and 154.174(site plan
review)
Transportation:Access is off of the Mall Frontage Road.
Physical Characteristics:Typical commercialdevelopment lot.
Analysis:
See the following for analysis on the site plan reviewand variance.
Site Plan:
The City Council deems it is necessary and appropriate to require site plan approval of developments in certain
zoning districts to preserve and promote attractive, well-planned, stable urban conditions. The following is an
overview of site plan considerations.
Building:
The proposed building is just over 8,000square foot one-story flat roofstructure that would be constructed
primarily withbrick/eifs finish. The height would be approximately 24feet high at the highest point.Six tenant
spaces are being tentativelyplanned for the buildings. Refer to attached building elevations and floor plan for
more information.It should also be noted that the building features a drive through around thebackside(east)
of the building.The proposed building meets allapplicable setbacks.
Setbacks:
Thebuildingand parking lot/driveways,as designed, will meet allapplicable setbacks.
Signage:
Building signage is proposedas showngenericallyon the attached building elevation. In addition, a 25’ pylon
sign is proposed. The proposed signage appears to meet ordinance requirements; however,each sign will be
reviewed in detail during the sign permitting process.
Site Plan Review and Variance
Shops at Hutch–1094Highway 15 So., Hutchinson.
Planning Commission –1-16-18
Page 3
Parking/Access/Circulation
Fifty-three (53)parking spaces are notedon the site plan. The zoning ordinance requires 5.5 spaces per 1,000
square feet of building, which is 45 parking spaces. The developer is providing eightmore parkingspaces than
required.
There is one ingress point into the site and two egress points. These are all located offthe mall frontage road.
Thesoutherly access point is an ingress and egress pointthat is 24’wideand thenortherlypoint is egress only
and is 14’wide.Staff feels the ingress/egress is appropriate for this site.
The circulation of the site appears acceptable to staff. The drive-through traffic can enter the site and get into
the drive-through area and leave the site without entering the parking lot area of the site. This design will lead
to fewer conflictsbetween drive-through traffic and vehicles attempting to park. The drive aisles in theparking
lot are 24’wide, whichis acceptable and preferred by staff. Patrons utilizing the parking lot can utilize either
the north of south egress point.
Staff would like to see the transformer box moved across the drive-through drive aisle to ensure it is notstruck
by vehicles. It appears to be very close to thedrive-through aisle on the SE side of the building.
Parking Stall Size
All of the parkingstalls proposed are 9’wide, which is acceptable. The center area of the parking lot is
proposed to have 19’longparking stalls. The Zoning Ordinance specifies 20’long parking stalls and the
applicant has submitted a variance to deviate from the standards set forthin thezoning ordinance. It is up to the
Planning Commission to determine if there is a “practical difficulty”in order to grant a variance. There was
significant discussion regarding this topic at the Planning Staff meeting. Staff discussed that there have been
variances issued previously for parking stalls 19’long and there are also other existing parking lots that are
repainted and the dimensions do nottechnically meet the zoning ordinance. Some staff felt these standards are
in place for a reason and they should notbe deviated from. It was also noted that variances are available to
allow deviations from the zoning ordinance if a practicaldifficulty can be met.In this instance, the developer
has chosen to apply for a variance.
Theparking spaces adjacent to the building and spaces on the far west side of the lot abut a curb and are 18.5’
long. Staff has historically allowed 18.5 long parking stalls that abut curbs because vehicles can overhang the
curb dependingon what is adjacent to the curband meet the intent of the 20’parking stall. Staff feels the 18.5’
parking stalls can work on the west side of the property and that the 18.5’stalls adjacent to the building can be
acceptable if a minor tweak is made to the landscaped area in front of the building. The issue is that if vehicles
are overhanging the sidewalk for parking,the 4’clear area required bythe American with Disabilities Act
(ADA)cannot be met due to cars encroachinginto the sidewalk area. Staff recommends that thedeveloper
shrink the landscape area from 5’to 3’to ensure that there will be 4’of clear area on the sidewalk as required
byADA.
Pond
Staff has noted to the developer that there has been some drainage issues in this area in thepast. Because of
this,the developer has included a filtration basin on the west side of the site to help alleviatesome of the storm
waterconcerns.Due to the size of the pond the developer is short a total of two feet for the required parking
stall size, thus the need for the variance.The pond will also be landscaped nicely, as noted in the landscape
plan.
Site Plan Review and Variance
Shops at Hutch–1094Highway 15 So., Hutchinson.
Planning Commission –1-16-18
Page 4
Landscaping and Lighting:
Staff has been working with the developer on landscaping for the project. The developer plans to remove the
trees that are currently located adjacent to the eastern property line in the MnDOT right-of-wayin order to
improve sight lines to the building. The developer will be workingwith MnDOT to obtain a permit for thetree
removal. City staff is fine with the trees being removed and the developer is mitigating the loss of trees by
adding an enhanced storm waterfeature on the site, as well as providing the required landscaping on-site.
Staff will be doing a complete landscape plan review at the time of building permit plan review. In reviewing
previous projects completed by this developer it appears that they are very aesthetically pleasing.
Staff has reviewed a detailed photometric lighting planand it appears acceptable.Per the Zoning Ordinance,
lighting installed must be indirect and shall not produce glare on adjacent properties or public right of ways.
Storm waterManagement/Erosion Control:
Following the final construction plan submittal and City reviewthe City Environmental Specialist will provide
comments that need to be addressed prior to building permits being issued.
Variance:
In order to grant a variance, the request must meet the standards for granting a variance, including the finding of
“practical difficulties.” Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are
practical difficulties in complying with the official control. “Practical difficulties” as used in connection with
the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner
not permitted by an official control; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property
not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute a practical difficulty if reasonable use for the property exists
under the terms of the ordinance.
Historically, variances required a “hardship”to be granted.Within recent years the standard has been switched
to a“practical difficulty”is required to grant a variance. Generally speaking the practical difficulty standard is
an easier standard to meet than the historic “hardship”standard.
There is a basic “test” to determine if a request meets the practical difficulties standard. To constitute practical
difficulties all three questions must be answered yes. The following are the factors that must be considered:
Practical difficulties
“Practical difficulties” is a legal standard set forth in law that cities must apply when considering applications
for variances. It is a three-factor test and applies to all requests for variances. To constitute practical difficulties,
all three factors of the test must be satisfied.
1. Reasonableness
The first factor is that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. This factor
means that the landowner would like to use the property in a particular reasonable way but cannot do so under
the rules of the ordinance. It does not mean that the land cannot be put to any reasonable use whatsoever
without the variance. For example, if the variance application is for a building too close to a lot line or does not
Site Plan Review and Variance
Shops at Hutch–1094Highway 15 So., Hutchinson.
Planning Commission –1-16-18
Page 5
meet the required setback, the focus of the first factor is whether the request to place a building there is
reasonable.
Staff feels that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a commercial
business with a drive-through. This question was answered YES.
2. Uniqueness
The second factor is that the landowner’s problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by
the landowner. The uniqueness generally relates to the physical characteristics of the particular piece of
property, that is, to the land and not personal characteristics or preferences of the landowner. When considering
the variance for a building to encroach or intrude into a setback, the focus of this factor is whether there is
anything physically unique about the particular piece of property, such as sloping topography or other natural
features like wetlands or trees.
Thedeveloper states that the lot is unique in that soil conditions on this lot allow for very slow infiltration, so
the storm waterretention pond size becomes more critical and larger than anticipated. The size of the storm
water retention ponding in the rain garden along the west property line takes up critical east/west lot dimension
that was planned to be used for parking.Staff feels this is a unique situation. This question was answered
YES.
3. Essential character
The third factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under this
factor, consider whether the resulting structure will be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with
the surrounding area. For example, when thinking about the variance for an encroachment into a setback, the
focus is how the particular building will look closer to a lot line and if that fitsin with the character of the area.
Staff feels this request will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under the context of this request,
staff believes the “locality” is the general area around this property. This area is a commercially zoned area
andstrip commercial developmentsare very common in commercial areas, in addition, the size of the building
and layout of the site is very typical for a commercially zoned area. This question was answered YES.
Other factors to consider for granting a variance are is the variance request in harmony with the purpose and
intent of the ordinance? In addition, is the variance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan?
Staff feels that the request is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance and meets the criteria set
forth above to grant a variance.
In addition, the Comprehensive Plan “guides” this area of the City for commercial development, which is
consistent with this variance request.
Please note that if the Planning Commission doesn’t agree with answers to thetest questions they can answer
them differently. Becauseall three questions above were answered yesin the staff analysis,it is recommended
the variance be grantedfor the following reasons:
1)The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a commercial property with
a drive-through.
Site Plan Review and Variance
Shops at Hutch–1094Highway 15 So., Hutchinson.
Planning Commission –1-16-18
Page 6
2)The landowner’s problem is unique to the property, in that storm watermanagement is noteasily
accomplished due to thesoil types and takes up a larger area than usual.
3)The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are many commercial properties
in this area with drive-through’s and the scale of the proposed building is similar to other buildings in
the area. In addition, there are other properties in the area that are not meeting the parkingstall size
requirements.
4)The variance is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance.
5)The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan reviewand variance with the following findings and conditions:
1.The landscapedarea on thewest side of the building, directly adjacent to the building,shall be reduced
in size to 3 feet from 5 feet to make the sidewalk larger to meet ADA standards.
2.The transformer shall be moved to the east side of the drive-through aisle unless alternative
arrangements can be made with Hutchinson Utilities Commission.
3.If any construction activity encroaches ontoproperty owned by the Hutchinson Mall an easement will
be needed from the owners of the Hutchinson Mall.
4.The proposed building and site improvements shall comply with the standards of the C-4 district and
the Zoning Ordinance, as well as all other City regulations.
5.Any reconstruction of existing infrastructure within City of Hutchinson right-of-way oreasement areas
shall be the developer’s responsibility, including improvements and associated costs. This work shall
meet all of the City’s engineering standards and be approved by the City.
6.There must be emergency service access around the buildingthat meets the fire code. Fire hydrants
must be located no farther than 400 feet from the building.
7.Exterior refuse collection area must be fully screened.
8.Moving or relocating any utility services will be at the property owner’s expense.
9.SAC/WAC charges will be due at the time building permits are issued.
10.A parkland contribution fee will be collected with the building permit.
11.MnDOT must approve any work done in the Highway 15 right-of way.
12.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner as a commercial property
with a drive-through.
13.The landowner’s problem is unique to the property;in that storm,watermanagement is noteasily
accomplished due to the soil types and takes up a larger area than usual, thus affectingthe available
space for the parking lot.
14.The request will not alter the essential character of the locality. There are many commercial properties
in this area with drive-through’s and the scale of the proposed building is similar to other buildings in
the area. In addition, there are other properties in the area that are not meeting the parkingstall size
requirements.
15.The variance is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance.
16.The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
50 GROVELAND TERRACE, SUITE #A, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403
H.K. HUTCHINSON, LLC
44263
1094 SOUTH HIGHWAY 15, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
LICENSE NO.
C1.0
MINNESOTA.
CivilSiteGroup.com
Matthew R. PavekMatthew R. Pavek REMOVALS PLAN
COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.
c
CITY SUBMITTAL......
SHOPS AT HUTCH DESCRIPTION............DESCRIPTION
REVISION SUMMARY
12/21/17............
......
SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
DATEDATE
DATE
PROJECT
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
Matt Pavek Pat Sarver12/21/17
763-213-3944 952-250-2003
PROJECT NO.: 17175
N
(651) 454-0002 LOCAL
(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE
WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
REMOVAL NOTES:
REMOVALS LEGEND:
HUTCHINSON
CITY OF
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
REMOVAL NOTES:
50 GROVELAND TERRACE, SUITE #A, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403
H.K. HUTCHINSON, LLC
44263
SITE PLAN
1094 SOUTH HIGHWAY 15, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
LICENSE NO.
C2.0
MINNESOTA.
CivilSiteGroup.com
Matthew R. PavekMatthew R. Pavek
COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.
c
CITY SUBMITTAL......
SHOPS AT HUTCH DESCRIPTION............DESCRIPTION
REVISION SUMMARY
12/21/17............
......
SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
DATEDATE
DATE
PROJECT
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
Matt Pavek Pat Sarver12/21/17
763-213-3944 952-250-2003
PROJECT NO.: 17175
N
(651) 454-0002 LOCAL
(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE
SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:
WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
HUTCHINSON
SITE PLAN LEGEND:
SITE LAYOUT NOTES:CITY OF
SITE AREA TABLE:
TOP=1060.756" PVC DT=1056.256" PVC DT=1056.25
FILTRATION BASIN 1FILTRATION BASIN 115" RCP OE=1060.00BOT=1057.75BOT=1057.75100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45
50 GROVELAND TERRACE, SUITE #A, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403
H.K. HUTCHINSON, LLC
44263
1094 SOUTH HIGHWAY 15, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
LICENSE NO.
C3.0
GRADING PLAN
MINNESOTA.
CivilSiteGroup.com
Matthew R. PavekMatthew R. Pavek
COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.
c
CITY SUBMITTAL......
SHOPS AT HUTCH DESCRIPTION............DESCRIPTION
REVISION SUMMARY
12/21/17............
......
SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
DATEDATE
DATE
PROJECT
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
Matt Pavek Pat Sarver12/21/17
763-213-3944 952-250-2003
PROJECT NO.: 17175
N
(651) 454-0002 LOCAL
(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE
WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
GRADING PLAN LEGEND:
GENERAL GRADING NOTES:
GRADING NOTES:
HUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSO
NHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINSONHUTCHINS
ONHUTCHINSON
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION
CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL
NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EROSION
CONTROL NOTES:
CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF
CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF CITY OF
GROUNDWATER INFORMATION:GROUNDWATER INFORMATION:GROUNDWATER INFORMATION:
50 GROVELAND TERRACE, SUITE #A, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403
H.K. HUTCHINSON, LLC
44263
1094 SOUTH HIGHWAY 15, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
LICENSE NO.
UTILITY PLAN
C4.0
MINNESOTA.
CivilSiteGroup.com
Matthew R. PavekMatthew R. Pavek
COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.
c
CITY SUBMITTAL......
SHOPS AT HUTCH DESCRIPTION............DESCRIPTION
REVISION SUMMARY
12/21/17............
......
SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
DATEDATE
DATE
PROJECT
PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
Matt Pavek Pat Sarver12/21/17
763-213-3944 952-250-2003
PROJECT NO.: 17175
N
(651) 454-0002 LOCAL
(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE
WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG
UTILITY LEGEND:
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
UTILITY NOTES:
HUTCHINSON
CITY OF
GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:
26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP26 LF 12" RCP
STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%STORM @6.23%
FES 4
IE=1062.12
CB 13CB 13
CBMH 3
RIM=1063.72
RIM=1063.64
NEENAH R-3067
NEENAH R-3067IE(SE/W)=1060.50
IE(SE/W)=1060.50
STORM @0.50%
197 LF 12" RCP
FROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/
MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD.
W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG.
COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM
BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'LFROM BLDG. COORD. W/ MECH'L
6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED
DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6"
DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED
DOMESTIC AND6" DIP COMBINED DOMESTIC AND
FIRE WATER SERVICE, STUB TO 5'FIRE WATER SERVICE, STUB TO 5'FIRE WATER SERVICE, STUB TO 5'
FIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE
DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTFIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION, TYP.CONNECTION, TYP.CONNECTION, TYP.CONNECTION, TYP.CONNECTION, TYP.CONNECTION, TYP.
STUB SANITARY TO 5' FROM BLDG.STUB SANITARY TO 5' FROM BLDG.COOR.D W/ MECH'LSTUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB
IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10STUB IE=1057.10BLDG IE=1057.50BLDG IE=1057.50BLDG IE=1057.50BLDG IE=1057.50BLDG IE=1057.50BLDG IE=1057.50
STORM @0.50%
196 LF 12" RCP
SANITARY @8.00%
91 LF 6" PVC SCH40
SANMH 1SANMH 1CONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT
OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYCONSTRUCT OVER EXISTING SANITARYSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER
CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSSERVICE PER CITY STANDARDSRIM=1064.57RIM=1064.57EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX
IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX
IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX
IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72EX IE(SW)=1049.72(FIELD VERIFY)(FIELD
VERIFY)PROP IE(E)=1049.82PROP IE(E)=1049.82(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY
HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION
OF PIPE)(FIELD VERIFY HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF PIPE)
CBMH 2
NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067NEENAH R-3067RIM=1062.95RIM=1062.95RIM=1062.95IE(E/NW)=1059.52IE(SW)=1060.72IE SUMP=1056.52
48 LF 12" RCPSTORM @0.50%
53 LF 12" RCP
STORM @0.50%
FES 1OE=1059.25
CBMH 12
FES 2AFES 2A
RIM=1063.04RIM=1063.04RIM=1063.04RIM=1063.04RIM=1063.04RIM=1063.04OE=1059.28OE=1059.28
FES 11
27 LF 15" RCP27 LF 15" RCPSTORM @0.50%9 LF 6" PVC DT9 LF 6" PVC DT@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%
92 LF 6" PVC DTFILTRATION BASIN 1TOP=1060.75BOT=1057.756" PVC DT=1056.256" PVC DT=1056.25CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION
TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING STMHCORE DRILL CONNECTION
TO EXISTING STMH(FIELD VERIFY)OS 1OS 1DRAINTILEDRAINTILECLEANOUT, TYP.
@0.00%@0.00%15" RCP OE=1060.00100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR
HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR
HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45100-YR
HWL=1060.45100-YR HWL=1060.45PER CITY STANDARDSPER CITY STANDARDSRIM=1064.2EX IE(NW/S)=1055.50PROP 15" RCP IE(E) =1056.11PROP 15" RCP IE(E) =1056.11PROP 15" RCP IE(E) =1056.11NEENAH
R-4342RIM=1060.00IE(E/W)=1056.25IE(E/W)=1056.25
DRAINTILEDRAINTILECLEANOUT, TYP.IE=1062.92
11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP11 LF 12" RCP
NEENAH R-3067
IE SUMP=1056.52
IE(E/NW)=1059.52
STORM @20.00%STORM @20.00%
GATE VALVEGATE VALVEGATE VALVE
HYDRANTHYDRANTRELOCATION W/RELOCATION W/RELOCATION W/
@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%@0.00%
GATE VALVEGATE VALVE
STANDARDS.STANDARDS.
22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22
LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT22 LF
6" PVC DT22 LF 6" PVC DT
SADDLE-TEE ANDSADDLE-TEE ANDSADDLE-TEE AND
TURN OFF EXISTINGTURN OFF EXISTINGTURN OFF EXISTING
TAP CONNECTION WITHTAP CONNECTION WITHTAP CONNECTION WITHTAP CONNECTION WITH
WATER VALVE TO MAKEWATER VALVE TO MAKEWATER VALVE TO MAKEWATER VALVE TO MAKEWATER VALVE TO MAKE
GATE VALVE TO EXISTINGGATE VALVE TO EXISTINGGATE VALVE TO EXISTINGGATE VALVE TO EXISTINGGATE VALVE TO EXISTING
WATER SERVICE PER CITYWATER SERVICE PER CITYWATER SERVICE PER CITYWATER SERVICE PER CITYWATER SERVICE PER CITY
50 GROVELAND TERRACE, SUITE #A, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403
H.K. HUTCHINSON, LLC
1094 SOUTH HIGHWAY 15, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
L1.0
CivilSiteGroup.com
COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.
LANDSCAPE PLAN c
CITY SUBMITTAL......
SHOPS AT HUTCH DESCRIPTION............DESCRIPTION
REVISION SUMMARY
............
......
ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY
DATEDATE
PROJECT
Matt Pavek Pat Sarver12/21/17
763-213-3944 952-250-2003
PROJECT NO.: 17175
N
(651) 454-0002 LOCAL
(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE
WWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG
GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
PERENNIAL BED PLANTING N T S
3
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:
N T S
DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING
2
N T S
DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING
LANDSCAPE NOTES: