Loading...
06-23-1981 CCMMINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen at 7:30 P.M., with the following members present: Aldermen Peterson, Lueneburg, and Beatty, in addition to Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen. Absent: Mayor Westlund. Also present: City Engineer Priebe and City Attorney Schantzen. (Note: Alderman Peterson left early at 9:25 P.M.) 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend John Longley of the First Congregational United Church of Christ. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 9, 1981 and Special Meetings of June 18, 1981 and June 22, 1981 were approved as read upon motion by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARING None 5. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) DISCUSSION REGARDING PAST IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BY PAT MIKULECKY (DEFERRED JUNE 9, 1981) Mr. Pat Mikulecky did not appear. The motion was made by Alderman Peterson to table this item. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion carried unani- mously. (b) PRESENTATION BY REVEREND JOHN LONGLEY REGARDING SUPPORT FOR SERVICES OF THE ELDERLY (GRANT FROM REGION 6E) The Rev. John Longley spoke on behalf of the elderly regarding the need for support by the Council of the services being rendered to senior citizens. He informed the Council a three-year grant was received under the American Act, and the funds are now running out. Rev. Longley then pointed out the various services performed for the elderly and the need to continue them. It was hoped the local community would pick up the expenses and continue the programs already started. An application had been made to Region 6E for a one year extension, but they requested a show from the City that there is support of the program and some funds for the work. It was requested that C�f V , COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 the City provide $200.00 a month from January 1982 to July 1982 in support of the program. A letter written by a senior citizen was read by Rev. Longley. Mrs. George Johnson of 506 Fifth Avenue stated she felt Rev. Longley had presented the requests of the people. If they lose their support, they will lose a lot. She was hopeful the Council would do their share to help them. Mrs. Leonard Miller of Arch Street summarized the num b er of senior citi- zens who had been served through this program. Alderman Lueneburg stated he was the Council representative to the senior citizen group, and he was aware of the figures presented and the help given to the elderly. He felt the request was modest, and the Council would give it consideration at the time they work on the 1982 budget. (c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF P.C.A. GRANT FOR RECYCLING PROGRAM IN HUTCHINSON Mr. Gary Nielsen of: West Central Insdustries in Willmar appeared before the Council to request support for a P.C.A. Grant appliction for a recycling program in Hutchinson. He reported he had operated a recyling program for the past two years which had been successful, and he would like to start one in Hutchinson. Mr. Nielsen stated he would need a Resolution of Support from the City Council in order to make application for a P.C.A. Grant. He further stated he had talked to the County Commissioner and Mr. Junker regarding his operation. It was the consensus of the Council that an agreement should be worked out between Junker Sanitation and Mr. Nielsen prior to opening his business. Alderman Peterson moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6867 en- titled Resolution of Support for Source Separation Demonstration Grant Pro- gram, contingent on an agreement between the two parties involved. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF DR. W. G. MISKOFF TO POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen requested ratification of the appointment of Dr. W. G. Miskoff to a three-year term on the Police Civil Service Commission. The motion was made by Alderman Beatty to ratify the appoint Bent of Dr. W. G. Miskoff. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. -2- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 19 81 (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT(S) ON CORNER OF HIGHWAY 15 NORTH AND WEST NORTH HIGH DRIVE AND/OR SOUTH END OF MICHAEL COURT City Engineer Priebe reported he had been contacted regarding street light- ing in this area, and he suggested the party write a letter of request to the City Council. The Police Department had inspected the area in question, and it was their recommendation to place a street light at Michael Court and West North High Drive. After discussion, Alderman Lueneburg moved to refer the request for street light(s) to the Hutchinson Utilities, with the recommendation of the Police Department. The motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unani- mously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR USE OF CITY SIDEWALKS FOR CRAZY DAYS ON JULY 22, 1981 AND FREE PARKING IN FRONT OF STORES The Hutchinson Downtown Retail Association requested permission to use the City sidewalks for their annual Crazy Days on July 22, 1981. In conjunction with this day, they also requested the merchants be able to cover the park- ing meters in front of their stores for free parking. Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Ald- erman Beatty, to approve both requests. Motion carried unanimously. (g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON DOWNTOWN RETAIL ASSOCIATION FOR USE OF CITY STREET FOR FARMERS MARKET The Hutchinson Downtown Retail Association requested permission to hold a Farmers Market on Saturdays, beginning July 11, 1981, from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. in the street area on First Avenue S.E. next to Library Square. A copy of the rules and regulations for the market wa& submitted. Concern was expressed as to who would be in charge and how the area would be left. Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Beatty to approve the use of the City street for the Farmers Market. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. (h) DISCUSSION OF RESIDENTS REGARDING JOINT AIRPORT FACILITY The Council meeting adjourned from the Council Chambers to the upstairs auditorium and reconvened. Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen welcomed the group of Concerned Citizens Opposed to a Joint Airport and called on Alderman Lueneburg, representative to the joint airport committee, for a review on the status of the project. -3- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 Alderman Lueneburg reported that in March 1981 Litchfield came to Hutchin- son with a proposal that the two communities build a joint airport. Hutch- inson recognized some of its airport problems, ie. a 3,200' runway which will accommodate limited aircraft and an inability to expand the runway due to the location of a church steeple. Therefore, a study committee was or- ganized to determine if the project would be feasible. The four member committee (two representatives from each city) has been studying the feasibility and possible sites for the proposed airport. Six sites were under consideration in April, with two eliminated. Alderman Luene- burg explained what makes a site feasible. He also pointed out that avia- tion funds come from the taxes paid on aviation fuel. In conclusion, Mr. Lueneburg stated the committee itself has no power to make a decision but only to give a recommendation to the respective Councils. Following the July 8, 1981 joint airport committee meeting, a recommendation will be brought to the two Councils. Gary Hoff, spokesman for the group, reported a citizens committee had been formed. He then proceeded to explain why they did not feel Hutchinson should go in with Litchfield on an airport. He pointed out the distance would be over 9 miles to the proposed airport versus 2-1/2 miles to the present site. Also, fire and police protection has to be taken into consideration. The type of airport being studied is a jet oriented one, and this will require additional fire equipment. Another consideration is crop land and the loss of it. He then made reference to a TV program on vanishing farm land. Over 80 acres of land would be taken out of production and paved. He stated one- fourth of the price increase of food is due to the loss of farm land. In talking to pilots, they feel the ideal location for an airport would be by Darwin where VOR equipment is already installed. The main concern is whether the airport is being built for the people of the communities or for one com- pany, namely Johnson Brothers of Litchfield. Mr. Hoff presented to the Council a petition signed by the affected land owners and those who would be affected by the proposed zoning. Judy Sladek of Litchfield stated she has been working on this project. She stated the wild life in the area would be affected by an airport, and the farm animals are going to hurt if this "monster" comes in the area. John Thor of Litchfield asked if the land for the airport would be acquired by condemnation or if it would be purchased. Alderman Lueneburg responded the City has never used the power of condemna- tion. For his part, he had no intention to go out into the country to start practicing it. -4- I COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 Gary Hoff requested to be notified of any upcoming airport meetings. He also asked for considertion of the loss effect to the farmers in the area. Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen commented that Mr. Hoff would be notified of future meetings. He stated there were several reasons why the City Council felt another site or airport should be considered. There are some people in Hutch- inson who work for Johnson Brothers, and the company needs an airstrip. It cannot be built for just one company, but 3M also has large planes which would use the airport. He pointed out that this type of airport can only be located 30 miles apart. Therefore, if Hutchinson does not enter into this joint ven- ture, they could not build one. This has to be taken into consideration and preliminary work done. He stated he was also opposed to condemnation pro- cedures. Alderman Lueneburg thanked the people for coming in and meeting with the Council on this matter. He stated it was important to have their presence and comments. The meeting adjourned to the Council Chambers and reconvened there. 6. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) ORDINANCE NO. 8/81 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Luene- burg, to waive second reading and adopt by reference Ordinance No. 622 entitled An Ordinance Adopting the Minnesota State Building Code. Motion carried unani- mous 1y. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 9/81 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 520 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED BUILDING PERMIT FEES (DEFERRED JUNE 9, 1981) City Engineer Priebe reported the present building permit fee schedule was adopted in 1974, with one change made in 1977 when the amount that no fee is charged was increased from $100.00 to $250.00. Following discussion, Alderman Lueneburg moved to defer action until the July 14, 1981 Council meeting. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion car- ried unanimously. (c) ORDINANCE NO. 10/81 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 635:10 OF 1974 ORDINANCE CODE OF CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED WEED ELIMINATION After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty to waive second -read- ing and adopt Ordinance No. 623 entitled Ordinance Amending Section 635:10 of 1974 Ordinance Code of City of Hutchinson, Entitled Weed Elimination. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion unanimously carried. -5- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 (d) RESOLUTION NO. 6837 - A RESOLUTION RELATING TO CITY PERSONNEL AND ESTABLISH- ING A BASIC PERSONNEL POLICY Personnel Coordinator Sitz reported on the City Personnel Policy and com- mented there was one change of holiday from Columbus Day to Thanksgiving Day Friday. After discussion, Alderman Lueneburg moved to waive reading and adopt Reso- lution No. 6837 entitled A Resolution Relating to City Personnel and Estab- lishing A Basic Personnel Policy. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. (e) RESOLUTION NO. 6859 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE Maintenance Operations Director Neumann reported the price is being increased for polymer so by buying in quantity at this time, he can save the City money. Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alder- man Beatty and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6859 entitled Resolution for Purchase. 7. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (a) MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - MAY 1981 There being no discussion, the report was ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. (b) MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION DATED MAY 19, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. (c) MINUTES OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD DATED APRIL 8, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. (d) MINUTES OF HOSPITAL BOARD DATED APRIL 21, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. (e) MINUTES OF NURSING HOME BOARD DATED MAY 21, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 (f) MINUTES OF TREE BOARD DATED MAY 20, 1981 There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor to be re- ceived for filing. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF ALLEY VACATION BY PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH (DEFERRED 2-22-77) City Engineer Priebe explained the delay for the vacation of the alley was due to a delay in the building program of Peace Lutheran Church. The first reading of Ordinance No. 4/77 was held on February 22, 1977. All the neces- sary arrangements have been worked out with the Hutchinson Utilities to re- move and relocate electric and gas utilities from the alley south of Fourth Avenue to Fifth Avenue between Glen and Franklin. The total cost of the re- location of utilities will be paid by the Church. It was suggested that cable TV work out their line relocation with the Church. The motion was made by Alderman Lueneburg to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 4/77 entitled An Ordinance to Vacate An Alley In Block 52 of the S 1/2 of the City, with the Peace Lutheran Church to work out an accept- able agreement with cable TV and the phone company. The motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty. During discussion, City Attorney Schantzen recommended issuing a new ordi- nance, with the first reading at this meeting. In the meantime, the church and cable TV could work out an agreement between them. Alderman Beatty amended the motion to waive first reading of Ordinance No. 11/81 entitled An Ordinance to Vacate An Alley In Block 52 of the S 1/2 of City, and to set the second reading for July 14, 1981. The motion was sec- onded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR 1981 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Alderman Lueneburg stated that Christ the King Church has litigation against Buffalo Bituminous for the work done on their parking lot. He didn't think the City should make award to low bidder, Buffalo Bituminous, for Letting No. 5. City Engineer Priebe commented the City had previous problems with this com- pany when they were awarded work. It was the recommendation of the City Engineer that the following be award- ed contracts for the 1981 improvement work: -7- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 Letting No. 1 - Projects 81-03, 81-07, 81-09, & 81-31 Progressive Contractors $119,792.45 Letting No. 2 - Project 81-10, Sections A, B and C Juul Contracting Co. $164,183.95 Letting No. 3 - Projects 81-12 & 81-14 Juul Contracting Co. $ 80,073.40 Letting No. 4 - Projects 81-17, 81-19, 81-26, 81-27 & 81-28 J. W. Hanson Construction Co. $217,457.00 Letting No. 5 - Projects 81-20, 81-21, 81-22, 81-23 & 81-33 Wm. Mueller & Sons $174,213.00 Letting No. 6 - Project 81-29 Already Awarded Letting No. 7 - Project 81-32 Progressive Contractors $ 47,211.00 Alt. A Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Lueneburg to accept the bids and award contracts as recommended, with the exception of Letting No. 5 to be awarded to Wm. Mueller & Sons. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6860 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Projects 81-03, 81-07, 81-09 & 81-31. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6861 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Project 81-10, Section A, B and C. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6862 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Projects 81-12 & 81-14. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6863 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Projects 81-17, 81-19, 81-26; 81-27 & 81-28. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6864 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Projects 81-20, 81-21, 81-22, 81-23 & 81-33. It was moved by Alderman Beatty, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6865 entitled Resolu- tion Accepting Bid and Awarding Contract, Project 81-32. (c) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS) FOR PHASE I DEVELOPMENT OF MCDONALD'S PARK (DEFERRED MAY 29, 1981) Parks & Recreation Director Ericson reported on the bids received for Mc- Donald's Park. He commented that the grant allowed for two fields to have lighting, but the proposal from Quade's to do four fields was an excellent idea. The payment on the two fields could be delayed until 1982. The fol- lowing recommendations were made: A. Earth Work - not accept any bids B'. Team Benches - not accept any bids C. Fencing - Combine C & D (backstops) - Crowly Fence Company in the amount of $19,932.00, which includes $14,740.00 for fencing and $5,192.00 for 4 backstops E. Sod & Seeding - No bids received F. Concession Building - Miller, Miller & Mac, Inc. in the amount of $39,685.00 (with adds and deducts) G. Lighting - Quade's in the amount of $46,922.00 for 4 fields, or alternate bid for 2 fields in the amount of $23,250.00 (with adds and deducts) H. Sanitary Sewer & Water System - Juul Contracting in the amount of $26,570.00 (with adds and deducts) I. Scoreboards - Quade's in the amount of $600.00 Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty to award the bids as recommended, with the exception of lighting from Quade's which will be clarified at the July 14, 1981 Council meeting. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MAINTENANCE OF SOUTHEAST (VOCATIONAL SITE) WATER TOWER (DEFERRED JUNE 22, 1981) City Engineer Priebe reported it was the staff's recommendation to award the contract to Odland Contracting in the amount of $14,500.00. COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 After discussion, Alderman Lueneburg moved to award the contract to Odland Contracting, based on the Engineer's recommendation. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF T.H. 22 (DEFERRED JUNE 9, 1981) City Engineer Priebe reported he had secured additional information for the Council regarding the relocation of State Highway No. 22. He then Qutlined the procedure to be followed to request the State to reroute the highway. The initial step would be for the Council to adopt a Resolution requesting the relocation of T.H. 22. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty to waive read- ing and adopt Resolution No. 6871 entitled Resolution Requesting Relocation of State Highway No. 22. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS A copy of the letter sent to all delinquent account holders was read by Vice - Mayor Gruenhagen. He then inquired if anyone was present wishing to be heard regarding his/her account. No one was present. Alderman Lueneburg moved to discontinue service on July 6, 1981, unless other- wise noted, for the following accounts: Account No. 03-1150-1-00, 04-0110- 5-001, 04-0290-0-00, 04-0600-1-00, 04-0850-5-00, 04-0855-7-00, 04-0955-2-00, 04-1100-4-00, 11-1222-3-00, 12-0170-0-00, 12-0415-0-00, 12-0860-1-00, 12-1165- 0-00, 15-0097-0-00, 15-0188-0-00, 16-0435-0-00, 16-0560-1-00, 27-0150-5-00, 40-0086-0-00, 41-0052-0-00. The motion was seconded by Alderman Beatty and unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY JAMES DEMEYER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Mr. Jim DeMeyer presented to the City Council the proposed project of Heri- tage Square condominiums. He stated the Planning Commission had approved the plan. City Engineer Priebe reported the Fire Marshall had requested a fire hydrant be placed in the center of the complex. After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Beatty that with the recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 6868 entitled Resolution Granting Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to Allow Multi -Family Housing In C-4 Zone. The motion was seconded by Alderman Peterson and carried, with Aldermen Pet- erson, Lueneburg and Beatty voting aye, and Vice -Mayor Gruenhagen abstained from voting. -10- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 (c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY RICHARD LARSON FOR KIMBERLY'S COUNTRY ESTATES WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING COMMISSION Extensive discussion was given to the fact that no boulevard is planned for this subdivision and some of the problems that could incur as a result. John Mlinar of 704 Hilltop distributed copies of a document of vital con- cerns of the preliminary plat. He pointed out areas where the plat did not meet the requirements of the City Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance and Comprehen- sive Plan. He felt the City guidelines were being overlooked, and they should be followed. Roman Haas read a letter from Paul Ginkel in which he expressed his concerns of non -development of the plat. Elton Hess of 111 Mark Drive pointed out this area was designed prior to annexation so the streets are not standard. He commented that there was only one exit in and out of the subdivision. Following lengthy discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Peterson to reject the Preliminary Plat for Kimberly's Country Estates and refer it back to the developer Richard Larson for further work. Seconded by Alderman Luene- burg, the motion carried, with Aldermen Peterson, Gruenhagen and Lueneburg voting aye, and Alderman Beatty voting nay. (d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SUBMITTED BY SAYLES WALDRADTH WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION After discussion, Alderman Beatty moved to waive reading and adopt Resolu- tion No. 6869 entitled Resolution Granting Variance from Section 6.05, B.3 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 for Reduction of Sideyard Setback to Allow Con- struction of Garage and Reduction of Front Yard Setback to Allow Replacement of Porch. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO (PUD) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DELMAR PITTMAN'S SOUTHDALE APARTMENTS WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION City Engineer Priebe reported that at a public hearing held on April 17, 1979 by the Planning Commission, it was recommended to close the access on Neal Avenue to the Southdale Apartments. However, at the request of the Fire Chief to leave the access open for better fire protection, a hearing was held on June 17, 1980 to amend the PUD to allow the Neal Avenue access to remain. It was the recommendation of the Planning Commission to amend the PUD to have the access on Neal Avenue remain open with the following conditions: 1) Sign "Fire Lane" be erected, 2) Signs reading "Do Not Enter" and "Do Not Exit" be erected, and 3) Yellowing of curb along Neal Avenue as well as any other necessary restrictions such as speed bumps, if necessary. -11- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously, to waive reading and adopt Reso- lution No. 6870 entitled Resolution Amending Conditional Use Permit (PUD) Under Section 6.07, C.5 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 Concerning Access on Neal Avenue for Southdale Apartments. (f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST SUBMITTED BY RICHARD SCHMIDTBAUER FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SCHMIDTBAUER'S SECOND ADDITION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Discussion was given to the lack of utilities on the preliminary plat. It was felt they should be provided at this point. The motion was made by Alderman Lueneburg to reject the preliminary plat for Schmidtbauer's Second Addition. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion car- ried unanimously. (g) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464, SECTION 8, ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION City Engineer Priebe reported the amendment to the Ordinance would zone an- nexed property as R-2 Multiple Family district and would eliminate the nec- essary hearings for R-1. After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Beatty to waive the first reading of Ordinance No. 13/81 entitled Amending Section 8 of the 1974 Ordi- nance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled Zoning Districts and Zoning Map, and set the second reading for July 14, 1981. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion unanimously carried. (h) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CLARENCE FREITAG TO MOVE A GARAGE Following discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alder- man Beatty and carried unanimously, to approve the request by Clarence Frei- tag to move a double car garage. (i) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING CITY ORDINANCE, SECTION 730:00, UNREASONABLE ACCELERATION The Chief of Police requested an amendment to Section 730:00 of the Ordi- nance to change the unreasonable acceleration to a petty misdemeanor. After discussion, Alderman Lueneburg moved to waive first reading of Ordi- nance No. 12/81 entitled Ordinance Amending Section 730:00 of the 1974 Ordi- nance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled Unreasonable Acceleration, and set the second reading for July 14, 1981. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion unanimously carried. -12- COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1981 (j) CONSIDERATION OF ADVERTISING FOR GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE AND DENTAL INSURANCE It has been City policy to bid out insurance if the quote exceeds 20%, and Blue Cross/Blue Shield has informed the City their rate will exceed 20%. Therefore, it was requested to advertise for bids on group health and dental insurance to be received on July 28, 1981 at 2:00 P.M. Following discussion, Alderman Beatty moved to authorize advertising for bids on group health and dental insurance. Seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, the motion carried unanimously. (k) CONSIDERATION OF INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR FOUR ENTITIES A premium proposal for the City's four entities was provided by Madsen In- surance Company, and it was the staff's recommendation to accept it. After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg to approve the recom- mendation for insurance coverage of the four entities, with the exception of umbrella liability. Seconded by Alderman Beatty, the motion carried unanimously. 10. MISCELLANEOUS None 11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Beatty and carried unanimously, to approve the verified claims and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before at 10:47 P.M. upon motion by Alderman Beatty, unanimously carried. -13- the Council, the meeting adjourned seconded by Alderman Lueneburg and