Loading...
03-23-2017 HUCCPMINUTES Special Meeting — Hutchinson Utilities Commission Thursday, March 23, 2017 Call to order — 7:00 a.m. President Morrow called the meeting to order. Members present: President Monty Morrow; Vice President Anthony Hanson; Secretary Mark Girard; Commissioner Robert Wendorff; Commissioner Don Martinez; General Manager Jeremy Carter Others present: Jared Martig, Dave Hunstad, Dan Lang, and Kim Koski. The purpose of the special meeting was to conduct a workshop to discuss Units 6 and 7 generation project. GM Carter presented an overview on the proposed generation project of installing two new units at Plant 1 (Units 6 and 7) at 9 to10 megawatts per unit along with a general timeline for the project. HUC would utilize tax-exempt financing along with entering into a capacity contract with municipal buyers which would cover the majority of the project cost. The estimated project cost is $16 million to $18 million to be financed over 20 years. GM Carter emphasized these are best estimates and the final costs of the project will be based on bid specifications and line item quoting by various vendors. (Presentation attached.) GM Carter stated there would be an out clause in the capacity contracts effective until December 2017 to allow an out if HUC decides before then that the project is not feasible. There would be approximately $700,000 of unrecoverable costs if the project does not move forward. After considering the concerns and benefits to HUC regarding this project, the Board sees the generator project as viable. GM Carter will put together additional analysis to bring back to the Board. There being no further business, a motion was made by Vice President Hanson, seconded by Secretary Girard to adjourn the meeting at 8:53 a.m. Motion was unanimously carried. Mark Girard, Secretary i ATTEST: Monty orrow, President �CHIHSOy Hutchinson Utilities Commission \j/CITIES Generation Project Workshop Tuesday, March 23, 2017 7:00 a.m. :;�]CHHINSO� d Generation Project Overview ai j \TI�ITIES Installation of (2) new units Units 6 & 7 (9-10 MW's/unit) Latest Installed Unit —Unit 5 in 2013 (9.3 MW's) Finance the project through Tax -Exempt Financing Enter into a Capacity Contract with Municipal Buyers This capacity contract would cover the majority of the project costs HUC can use the energy at it's discretion 0000!�SCNIHSO,y Estimated Project Costs \tl L 171ES Estimated Project Cost: �$15.8M-$18.3M Initial Preparation Costs: $65K Generator Costs: $8-$10.5M Engineering Services: $382K Electrical Contracting: $1.6M Construction/Concrete Work: $600K Meth/Strutt/Civil/Materials/Commissioning: $3.2M Cooling Tower Upgrade: $342K Contingency &Consulting Fees: $1.6M Est. 20 Year Financing Cost : --$25.3M-$28.3M Bank Qualified or bid into the market Yearly P&I on Debt Service: $1.2M - $1.4M Cash outlay on cooling tower upgrade 20 Year Capacity Contract Revenue: $23.5M Yearly Capacity Revenue: $1.176M Other Financing &Cash Flow Options: Combination of Cash and Tax Exempt Financing 25 or 30 Year Financing Capitalize Interest &defer principal payments until 2020 Pay only interest &defer principal payments until 2020 Front/Back load debt service payments versus level structure �jCHIN$FN t U*01 �T1lIT1E� Discussion on Documents to Approve Capacity Agreement Buyer and Seller Agreement -20 MW's of Capacity for 20 years. Additional 10 year extension opportunity. NAEMA is the comprehensive document to the capacity sales agreement Supplemental Agreement Part of the Capacity agreement — speaks to credit assurance, default scenarios, collateral assurances ❑ Consulting Agreement This is the agreement to broker the deal between the prospective buyers of the capacity & HUC ❑ Engineering Agreement �CH^lps�� Timeline on Documents to Approve \T�LITIES Capacity Agreement April/May Timeframe Out clause until December 31, 2017 Supplemental Agreement April/May Timeframe Consulting Agreement April/May Timeframe Two payment Installments: First one at capacity agreement execution ❑ Engineering Agreement April/May Timeframe Potentially Unrecoverable Costs �TlITIES Capacity & Supplemental Contract Approval: April Engineering Contract Approval: April Bid Specifications sent: End of July Bids Received: End of August Final Project Costs Identified: Mid September Potentially Unrecoverable Costs Preparation costs: $65K Engineering Fees: 50%-75% of total fee$382K First Half Consulting Fee Payment: ~$413K Generator Benefits to HUC �TLITIES Begins the long-term process of capital replacement of aging generators unit 3 & 4 (-3.5 MW/unit) Unit b would allow HUC to be completely hedged against the market when HUC's load is over 51 MW's Unit 7 could be excess generation for market sales or allow a more efficient unit to run versus an older unit for HUC's hedging program. Allows for additional energy contract sales May provide opportunity for ancillary revenues Continues to provide long-term business flexibility & generation capabilities into the future if/when the industry changes Allows HUC to continually leverage the gas pipeline Generator Concerns to HUC �t►UTIES Continues to keep HUC tied to long-term assets Continues staff monitoring & reporting on generator emissions & regulations Continue to have O & M costs involved in adding fleet Cf Review Detailed Documents %%bf, ISS Cash Flow models January 2019 — /'nay 2020, look for short-term capacity or energy contracts to mitigate cash flow outlays Project Timeline Generators operational by year end 2018 Detailed Project & Financing Costs Generator Operational Information Wholesale Business Model Financials ,ICH^INSO f Board Discussion Points �Tt lIT1Es Viable Project Structure from the Boards Perspective Is there a maximum project cost or spread between the annual revenue received and debt service that would kill the project structure proposed? Is the board comfortable with the unrecoverable costs if a project does not move forward? What other information or analysis would the board like to see? Questions?. ?. ?m ?m