06-21-2016 PCM
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday,June 21, 2016
5:30 p.m.
1.CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The June 21, 2016 Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Hantgeat
Chair Hantge
5:30 p.m. Members in bold were present , Commissioner Kirchoff,
Commissioner KalenbergCommissioner Norton, Commissioner Arndt,
,
Commissioner Wick, CommissionerFaheyDan Jochum
and. Also present were ,City
Kent ExnerMarc Sebora,Kyle Dimler
Planner,, City Engineer, City Attorney,and ,
City Building Official.
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.CONSENT AGENDA
A.CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES DATED MAY 17, 2016.
Motion by Commissioner Arndt, Second by Commissioner Norton. Motion
approved.
Motion to Approve
–Motion to Reject
4.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED
GARAGE IN THE FRONT YARD LOCATED AT 1011 LEWIS AVE SW.
Dan Jochum, City Planner addressed the Commission. Mr. Jochum reviewed the
lot and proposed garage project on the site of 1011 Lewis Ave. SW.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the subject application as included in the Staff report in the
Commissioners’ packets.
nd
Mr. Jochum noted that 4 lots along Lewis Ave. and 2Ave. SW have garages in
their front yards and 3 of those 4 have obtained variances as required.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the required practical difficulties in complying with the
official control: 1) Reasonableness, is the use reasonable? 2) Uniqueness, is the
difficulty caused by the uniqueness of the land and not the preference of the land
owner? 3) Essential character, will the essential character of the locale change if
the variance is granted. Staff believes that this application meets the 3-part test of
practical difficulties.
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
June21, 2016
Page 2
Commissioner Arndt asked if the house on the subject lot is currently over the
property line.
Mr. Jochum noted that the line Commissioner Arndt was referring to is somewhat
skewed due to the angle at which the aerial photo was taken.
Commissioner Fahey asked if the proposed garage would be in line with other
nearby garages located in front yards.
Mr. Jochum indicated that it is approximately in line.
Jim Christopherson, applicant addressed the Commission and noted that the
proposed location of the garage would be approximately 25 feet from the house
and 83 feet from the garage to the street curb.
Mr. Jochum noted that the Commissioners did receive one letter from an
adjoining neighbor requesting the Commission consider the author’s objection to
this proposal.
Chair Hantge asked if 1005 Lewis Ave.
Lee Streteskyapplied 10/26/2004 variance to construct a garage in the front yard
Adrian Peterson 1005 Lewis Ave. SW addressed the Commission. Ms. Peterson
noted that when the garage was built on her property the owner at the time asked
for input from neighboring property owners. Ms. Peterson noted her belief that
her property value may be decreased by having a large garage built adjacent to her
lot. Ms. Peterson noted that she is concerned that constructing numerous garages
in front yard space along Lewis Ave. SW will result in a tunnelfeel.
George Dostal 1014 Lewis Ave. SW. Mr. Dostal stated that he purchased his
property because Lewis Ave. SW was the nicest street and town and would like to
see it remain the same. Mr. Dostal noted that Lewis Ave. SW is a unique area and
he would like to keep it that way.
Commissioner Fahey asked Mr. Dostalif he objected to the variance in 2004.
Mr. Dostal noted he did.
Mr. Jochum noted Staff recommends the garage siding and roofing to match the
house on the property, screening provided on south and east sides of garage, and
any required moving of utilities would be solely at the owner’s expense, existing
drainage patterns are not to be altered.
Commissioner Wick asked if Staff would recommend a small drainage ditch on
the east side of the garage.
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
June21, 2016
Page 3
Mr. Jochum noted that the applicant would be responsible to submit a proposed
drainage plan.
Mr. Christopherson noted that his proposed garage will be lower than the one
adjacent to his.
Motion by Commissioner Norton, Second by Commissioner Wick to close public
hearing at 5:54p.m. Motion approved unanimously.
Motion by Commissioner Norton, Second by Commissioner Hantgeto approve
with staff recommended conditions. Approved unanimously. Item will be on
City Council’s consent agenda next Tuesday.
Motion to approve with staff recommendations
Motion to close hearing ––Motion to reject
B.CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONALUSE PERMIT TO REMODEL AN
EXISTING OFFICE SPACE INTO A SALON IN THE C-5 CONDIDTIOANL
COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 300 HWY 7 W.
Dan Jochum, City Planner addressed the Commission. Mr. Jochum reviewed the
application as included in the Commission’spackets.
Mr. Jochum noted that there are no exterior changes proposed to the subject
building.
Mr. Jochum noted Staff recommends approval with conditions 1-4 as include in
the packets.
Commissioner Arndt asked what the remainder of the building would be.
Mr. Jochum noted it would not change from what it currently is.
Motion by Commissioner Fahey, Second by Commissioner Wick to close public
hearing at 5:59p.m. Motion approved unanimously.
Motion by Commissioner Fahey, Second by Commissioner Wick to approve with
staff recommended conditions. Approved unanimously. Item will be on City
Council’s consent agenda next Tuesday.
Motion to approve with staff recommendations
Motion to close hearing ––Motion to reject
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
June21, 2016
Page 4
C.CONSIDERATION OF A SITE PLAN, PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT
FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING LOCATED AT 1315 MONTREAL ST SE.
Dan Jochum, City Planner, addressed the Commission. Mr. Jochum introduced
Chris Rayman from Koepers Development group to review the application.
Mr. Rayman noted to thewest will be an out lot and to the south there will be a
storm water detention pond that is ultimately planned to be returned to the City’s
ownership.
Mr. Rayman noted there is planned to be a green courtyard in between each of the
proposed buildings on the site. Mr. Rayman noted there will be a combination of
stone veneer and vinyl siding to help break up the mass of the structure.
Mr. Rayman noted that construction is planned to move from the east to the west
as the market drives demand. The planned color palate is to be blue/gray/beiges.
Commissioner Arndt asked about planned lighting for the site.
Mr. Rayman noted that the lighting will be directed downward and comply with
local lighting regulations. Mr. Rayman stated that they plan to provide numerous
trees and will work with the City Engineer and Forester to verify appropriate
plantings.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the number of units planned for each building. The
buildings will be 31 feet tall and each dwelling unit will be accessed from interior
hallways.
Mr. Rayman noted there will be 19 garage stalls per building.
Mr. Jochum noted that all setbacks appear to be met in the proposal. However,
Mr. Jochum noted that there is a significant elevation difference between the
subject property and the adjacent single family dwellings to the east. Staff
recommends that screening trees on the easterly side of this property be place on
the upper flat portion of the property rather than in the existing slope on the
eastern border.
Mr. Jochum also stated that Staff notes the 3:1 slope proposed is quite steep and
wants to ensure the landscaping can be maintained.
Commissioner Wick asked how the applicant plans to stabilize a 3:1 grade.
Mr. Rayman stated the plan is to mowed grass in this location.
Mr. Rayman also noted the eastern garages are broken up by stone veneer and
architectural components.
Chair Hantge asked who the intended market is for these apartments.
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
June21, 2016
Page 5
Mr. Rayman indicated that this development company has developments
throughout the state, apartments are market rates and 20% TIF funded units.
Bruce Naustdal, 1175 Dale St. SW addressed the Commission. Mr. Naustdal
noted he owns property on Bradford St. SE and asked for clarification of where
this proposal is located in relation to his property.
Mr. Jochum reviewed the proposed location of the apartment buildings and the
garages would be approximately 20’ from the easterly
Motion by Commissioner Norton,second by Commissioner Wick to closepublic
hearing at 6:18p.m.
Mr. Jochum noted Condition 12 should include screening of the garages as well as
the parking lot.
Motion by Commissioner Nortonto approve with 16Staff recommended
conditions, second by Commissioner Kalenberg.Motion approved unanimously.
Item will be on City Council consent agenda next Tuesday.
Motion to approve with staff recommendations
Motion to close hearing ––Motion to reject
D.CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT LOCATED AT
210 HASSAN ST SE.
Dan Jochum, City Planner, addressed the Commission.
Mr. Jochumnoted that this application is basically a plat to formalize a lot that
will allow proceeding forward with the MidCountry Bank project that the
Commission has reviewed multiple times over the past several months.
Motion by Commissioner Fahey, Second by Commissioner Arndt to close the
public hearing at 6:21 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Fahey, Second by Commissioner Nortonto approve
with staff recommended conditions. Approved unanimously will be on Council
consent agenda next Tuesday evening.
Motion to approve with staff recommendations
Motion to close hearing ––Motion to reject
Minutes
Hutchinson Planning Commission
June21, 2016
Page 6
5. NEW BUSINESS
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
7. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
A. Upcoming Meetings
Mr. Jochum noted that Staff has received one application for a new building to be
constructed on a lot on West Hwy 7 for the July Planning Commission meeting.
Mr. Jochum noted that there are also some training opportunities available for
Commission members who are interested. Mr. Jochum asked Commissioners to
see him if they are interested.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Arndt, Second by Commissioner Wick to adjourn at
6:24 p.m.