03-23-1976 CCMMINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 23, 1976
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:34 P.M. by Mayor Black. Those
present were Aldermen Haag, Lueneburg, and Peterson in addition to
Mayor Black. Those absent were: Alderman Westlund. Also present
were: Administrative Assistant Fleetham, City Engineer Priebe, and
City Attorney Schantzen.
2. INVOCATION
The Invocation was given by Reverend Manley Swarthout.
3. MINUTES
Upon motion by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Peterson, the
minutes of the regular meeting of February 25, 1976, the special meeting
of February 25, 1976, the special meeting of March 4, 1976 and the
regular meeting of March 9, 1976 were approved unanimously.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
( ) CONSIDERING A PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 560 MODIFYING
WATERWORKS AND SEWER DEPARTMENTS - RATES AND CHARGES
The Public hearing was opened at 7:50 P.M. The Mayor read the
hearing notice. He gave a background of the Council's consideration
of the Water and Sewer Department Budget during the 1976 Budget
Hearings. The Council had employed the firm of Toltz, King, Duvall
Anderson and Associates to review our rates to see if they are
providing sufficent monies to meet our expenses. He also stated that
while some communities may operate water and sewer utilities to
provide a profit, the policy of the Hutchinson City Council was to
meet only our capital and operating expenses. Mayor Black then introduced
Mr. Rex Stockwell and Mr. DuWayne Kasma of Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson
and Associates for a summary of their study. Mr. Rex Stockwell summarized
the Water Rate Study. He identified the following factors:
1. Method of Data Collection
2. Method of Base and Usage Determination
3. Determination of Revenue needed
4. Determination of Service Charge and Commodity Charges
5. Compared Hutchinson's water users highest volume
with the proposed rates and the rates of other communities
6. Outlined the Conclusions and recommendations of his Firm
Mr. Stockwell went on to review the Sewer Rate Study
1. Method of Data Collection and Method of Base and Usage
Determination 30
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
2. The basis of rate study and EPA criteria
3. Reviewed the Useage Charges
4. Determination of the revenue requirements for the future
5. Illustrated how he determined the charges based on service
charge and volume
6. Reviewed a proposed surcharge
7. Reviewed the proposed rates on users according to meter
size
8. Illustrated the effect on Hutchinson's largest volume users
9. He gave his conclusions and recommendations of the sewer
study
10. He reviewed the various methods open to the Council to
finance the sewer system giving the advantages and disadvantages
of all. Recommended the City proceed to comply with the
EPA suggested guidelines.
Mayor Black then asked those in attendance in the audience if they had
any questions or comments regarding the presentation.
Mr. Bill Guse questioned if we anticipated any federal grants for such
improvements.
City Engineer Priebe indicated yes we did, but doubted if it would be
until closer to the end of the five year study period.
Mr. Stolpman questioned whether their were minutes being taken after
which he was informed yes there were.
Mr. Rub Mahron representing 3M questioned when will the rates take
effect. Mayor Black responded the first time they could be officially
adopted would be the April 13th meeting of the City Council. Administrative
Assistance Fleetham responded that they hoped that the first billing of
the new rates would take place in May.
Mr. Grant Merritt of the firm of Nielsen, Blackburn and Merritt of the
Peavey Building was present representing Mr. Jon Geiss of Hutchinson
Industrial Corporation. He further stated he had retained the firm of
Harry Grounds and Associates as consulting engineers to assist him
in his study. He indicated that the proposed rate increase would
cause substantial increase for Hutchinson Industrial Corporation.
He indicated that they were not against an increase persay but would
like time to understand what was happening. He cautioned the Council
that they should consider very carefully many different options and
advised them that they were faced with a complicated issues and
systems. He requested the Council put this over until the next regular
Council meeting and that they had only received the report on the 18th
of March. He stated that it was a mistake for the Council to pass
this upon the first reading and then he called upon Mr. Harry
Grounds. Mr. Grounds indicated that he would be providing technical
assistance and he had written a letter to TKDA asking for a copy of
the study. He indicated that he felt that there were other alternatives
than what TKDA had submitted.
- 2 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
Mayor Black indicated that there would be a three week interm
period between the first reading and the second reading if the
Council gave first reading tonight.
Mr. Merritt stated that he believed that a Council approved first
reading it was a commitment to approve the second reading. He
further questioned the proposed conformance with the EPA requirements
and he outlined his experiences in other areas.
Mayor Black thanked Mr. Merritt for his comments.
Alderman Lueneburg asked Mr. Mahron from 3M what was his response
to the rate increase. In response Mr. Mahron said he had not
received any input from his engineers in the St. Paul office.
Mr. Stolpman then questioned the meter charge, his understanding
that there would be two departments established, the increased
costs for billing. The Administrative Assistant clarified that
it was the setting up of separate accounting systems rather than
two separate departments and he also spoke to the cost savings that
the Council and the Municipal Utilities Commission were attempting
to effect.
Mr. Stockwell spoke to the water service base charge and outlined
its determination by meter size and the cost and the maintenance
of those meters.
Mr. Stolpman then spoke against the meter costs stating his was
paid for once. He also said it was not possible for him to forecast
for his business for five years and said the Council would talk on
a different basis if they had to face competition.
Mr. Stockwell again outlined his criteria for the conclusions.
Mr. Stolpman said that the proposed rates are higher than in any
other areas he is aware of and that businessmen cannot face future
costs if these are to continue.
Administrative Assistant Fleetham again pointed that they are trying
to affect as many cost savings as possible in the utility and under-
lining that the City is currently undergoing a $100,000 deficit in
the Sewer Fund.
Mr. Stolpman stated then that the billing of meter charges were in-
flated, and he would like more time to prupose an alternative.
Mr. Merritt commented on Mr. Fleetham's remarks and questioned how
the figures were determined.
Administrative Assistant Fleetham and Mr. Stockwell outlined that
these are reflecting current costs and the costs for the last five
years. Administrative Assistant Fleetham stated that the information
TKDA had been provided would be available to anyone who would wish
to utilize it for their review.
- 3 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
Mr. Jon Geiss of Hutchinson Industrial Corporation summarized how
he believed the costs were decided and questioned how business can
forecast their costs. He then stated that the increases should
come gradually rather than looking to a base year.
Mr. Stockwell responded that these are not sudden increases, but
that the increase in revenue also comes from increased volumes
that they had projected for the next five years. He explained
the 59 cent charge and how that charge and the anticipated expenses
for each of the next five years were approximately equal with
the projected volume increases.
Mr. Geiss questioned the discussion of possible excess funds in the
utilities to which Mr. Stockwell replied some excess funds must be
available to meet emergencies and unprojected expenditures.
Mayor Black summarized that the rate increase must be made but the
question boils down to who must pay and the portion that the
residential property will pay versus the portion that the commerical
property will pay of the burden.
Mr. Grant Merritt questioned the billing and the deadlines that he
had understood from the Administrative Assistant on the phone that
day.
Administrative Assistant Fleetham commented that the 13th would
probably be the last day that any change could be made and still
be reflected in the May billing.
Upon the motion of Alderman Peterson, seconded by Alderman Haag,
to continue the hearing for three weeks. Motion failed on a 2 to
2 vote with Aldermen Haag and Peterson voting in favor. It was
then moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Haag, to
close the hearing. Motion carried unanimously.
It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Mayor Black, to
waive first reading and set second reading for April 13, 1976 of
Ordinance No. 12/76 entitled, Ordinance Amending Section 560 of
the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled
Waterworks and Sewer Department - Rates and Charges. Motion
failed on a 2 to 2 vote with Aldermen Peterson and Haag voting
in opposition to the motion.
At a later point in the meeting, it was moved by Alderman Haag,
seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, to reconsider the amendment to
Section 560 of the 1974 Ordinance Code. Motion carried unanimously.
Administrative Assistant Fleetham and Mayor Black asked the City
Council questions regarding the deficit and what steps that they
would like the Staff to take.
Mr. Rex Stockwell and Mr. DuWayne Kasma outlined again the
alternative the Council had before and also drew attention to
the actual $100,000 deficit that the utility was incurring at
- 4 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
this point. They again outlined the EPA suggested guidelines and
reasons for adopting such a rate system.
The Administrative Assistant stated that as long as he would know
by April 13th he would be in a position to either continue billing
at the existing rates using the Burroughs L-5000 or if it was approved
utilize the computer for the new rates on the May billing. He stated
that he believed that new forms might possibly have to be ordered for
the Burroughs, if we were to extend its use any longer than April.
It was then moved by Alderman Haag, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg
to waive first reading and set second reading for April 13, 1976
of Ordinance No. 12/76, entitled, Ordinance Amending Section 560
of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson entitled
Waterworks and Sewer Department - Rates and Charges. Motion carried
on a three to one vote with Alderman Peterson voting in opposition.
5. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) REQUEST OF HUTCH YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION TO ADDRESS THE CITY
COUNCIL
The Council was advised that the Association had withdrawn their
request at this time.
6. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 5/76 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7.02 ENTITLED
FISCAL YEARS OF CHAPTER VII OF THE CITY CHARTER CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
RELATING TO TAXATION AND FINANCES
It was moved by Alderman Haag, seconded by Alderman Lueneburg, to
waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 502, entitled, Ordinance
Amending Section 7.02 Entitled Fiscal Years Chapter VII of the
City Charter City of Hutchinson, Relating to Taxation and Finances.
Motion carried unanimously with Aldermen Haag, Lueneburg, and
Peterson and Mayor Black voting in favor.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 6/76 - ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 11.09 ENTITLED
FISCAL YEARS OF CHAPTER XI OF THE CITY CHARTER, CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
RELATING TO PUBLIC OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF UTILITIES
It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Peterson
to waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 503, entitled,
Ordinance Amending Section 11.09 Entitled Fiscal Years of Chapter
XI of the City Charter, City of Hutchinson, Relating to Public
Ownership and Operation of Utilities. Motion carried unanimously
with Aldermen Lueneburg, Haag and Peterson and Mayor Black voting
in favor.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 5664 - APPROVING SECURITIES FOR FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF MINNEAPOLIS OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Haag, to
- 5 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 5664 - Approving Securities
for First National Bank of Minneapolis of Minneapolis, Minnesota
Motion carried unanimously.
7. REPORTS OF OFFICIERS. BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
(a) MINUTES OF THE BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME BOARD MEETING DATED
FEBRUARY 18, 1976
There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the
Mayor received for filing.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION CONCERNING HUTCHINSON ANIMAL SHELTER
The Mayor reviewed the proposed animal shelter for South Park and
indicated he had received communications of opposition. He did not
feel it was the proper place for the animal shelter to be placed.
Administrative Assistant Fleetham reviewed several other alternatives
for Council consideration. It was moved by Alderman Haag, seconded
by Alderman Peterson, to utilize the Park Garage as an animal shelter
and authorized the Clerk -Administrative Assistant to contract for
alterations to that building in the amount of approximately $3,500.
The motion carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) REQUEST OF TEMPLE CRUSADERS TO HAVE FIRE TRUCK, RESCUE TRUCK AND
AMBULANCE PRESENT AT THE HUTCHINSON AIRPORT ON JUNE 6TH
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded
by Alderman Haag, to authorize the Fire Department to have
vehicles present and request the Hutchinson Hospital to have
an ambulance present. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) RECOMMENDATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT REGARDING REORGANIZATION
OF CITY MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENTS
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by
Alderman Peterson, to authorize the reorganization of the City
Maintenance Departments. Motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR RENEWAL OF CLUB LIQUOR LICENSES
The following applications were received: V.F.W. Post No. 906,
American Legion Post No. 96, Hutch Elks, Inc., and Crow River
Country Club. After discussion, it was moved by Alderman
Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Haag, to approve the applications
and authorize the renewal of the Club Liquor Licenses. Motion
carried unanimously.
- 6 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
(d) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR RENEWAL OF LIQUOR LICENSES
The following applications were received: The Chalet Supper
Club and The Dinner Bell, Tnc. After discussion, it was
moved by Alderman Haag, seconded by Alderman Peterson to
approve the applications and authorize the renewal of the
Liquor Licenses. Motion carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FROM FARMERS
ELEVATOR ASSOCIATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded
by Alderman Peterson, to authorize issuance of a Conditional
Use Permit to Farmers Elevator Association for the construction
of an elevator, office, warehouse, bulk fertilizer blending
plant and a bulk petroleum plant. Motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FROM
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
OF PLANNING COMMISSION
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded
by Alderman Haag, to authorize the issuance of a Conditional
Use Permit to the Hutchinson Utilities Commission contingent
that if Fourth Avenue from Superior Street to Michigan Street
was ever vacated, the Utilities Commission would provide an
extention of the 8" Watermain from Michigan Street to the
rear of their property to provide water for potential fire
fighting useage. Motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR VACATION OF EASEMENT BY MR. EMMIT
MCCORMICK AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Peterson, seconded
by Alderman Haag, to waive first reading and set second
reading for April 13, 1976 of Ordinance No. 14/76, entitled,
an Ordinance to Vacate Easement Lying Along West line of Lot
4, Block 2, Stoney Point Addition, Together with the easement
Lying Along the East line of Lot 3, Block 2, Stoney Point
Addition. Motion carried unanimously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION - ROBB TOTESHEK AND CROW
RIVER COUNTRY CLUB AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Peterson, seconded
by Alderman Lueneburg, to waive reading and adopt Resolution
No. 5668, entitled, Request for Annexation. Motion carried
unanimously.
- 7 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
(i) CONSIDERATION OF COST ESTIMATE FOR SCHOOL ROAD BRIDGE BORINGS
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded
by Alderman Peterson, to authorize the firm of Braun Engineering
to provide necessary borings. Motion carried unanimously.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING FOR MARCH 30, 1976
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by
Alderman Peterson, to set a Special City Council Meeting for 8:00 A.M.
on Tuesday, March 30, 1976. Motion carried unanimously.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF BURIAL SITE FOR BICENTENNIAL TIME CAPSULE
It was the concensus of the Council that City Attorney Schantzen
report to the Council on any legal problems that have been
encountered on such a burial.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CLERK -ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1. Upon a request of Administrative Assistant Fleetham, it was
moved by Alderman Haag, seconded by Alderman Peterson, to
increase Intown Mileage Allowance from $25.00 to $30.00
for those individuals who utilize their own vehicles for
various municipal functions. Motion carried unanimously.
2. Administrative Assistant Fleetham mentioned the Coalition
of Outstate Cities Meeting in St. Paul on March 26th. He
and Mayor Black were intending to attend.
3. Administrative Assistant Fleetham reviewed a communication that
he received that the City had received word that they would be
receiving a Intergovernmental Government Personnel Act Grant in
the amount of $4,800.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR BLACK
1. Mayor Black commented that Administrative Assistant Fleetham,
Personnel Coordinator Sitz, and the Chief of Police had reviewed
several applicants for the position of Community Service Officer.
Upon that reviewal, it was the concensus of the group and the
Mayor's appointment of Mr. Mike Monge to the position of the
Community Service Officer. It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg,
seconded by Alderman Peterson, to ratify the appointment of
Mr. Michael Monge to the Position of Community Service Officer.
Motion carried unanimously.
- 8 -
Council minutes, March 23, 1976
2. Mayor Black made the following appointments to the Library
Board: Ralph Bergstrom
Sally Cone
Earl Schmitz
It was then moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman
Peterson to ratify said appointments. Motion carried unanimously.
3. Mayor Black noted a Letter of Appreciation for the Police
Department's outstanding performance and directed that the
proper officer be made aware of the commendation.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY SCHANTZEN
1. City Attorney Schantzen requested Council concurrence in ordering
two homes below standards to either be improved or demolished.
It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Haag
to authorize Mayor Black to sign an order directing that
Charles W. Danielson and Viola M. Danielson for structure
located on the N 120' of Lot 27, Lynn Addition of the City of
Hutchinson. Motion carried unanimously.
It was then moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman
Haag, to authorize Mayor Black to sign an order directing that
Frank Schiller and Robert Schiller regarding the structure on
Lot 2, Block 8, College Addition City of Hutchinson. Motion
carried unanimously.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
It was moved by Alderman Lueneburg, seconded by Alderman Peterson
that the claims be approved and authorize payment from the appropriate
accounts. Motion carried unanimously.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
was declared adjourned at 10:17 P.M.on motion by Alderman Haag, seconded
by Alderman Lueneburg and carried unanimously.
- 9 -