Loading...
08-20-1985 PCM cPlanning Commission Minutes - 8/20/85 Minutes Hutchinson Planning Commission Tuesday, August 20, 1985 1. CALL -TO -ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Roland Ebent at 7:30 p.m., with the following members present: Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young, Don Erickson; Shu -Nei Hwang, Larry Romo and Chairman Ebent: Members absent: Thomas Lyke. Also present: City Administrator Gary D: Plotz, Director of Engineering Marlow Priebe and City Attorney James Schaefer. 2. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, July 16, 1985, were approved as presented on a motion by Mr. Torgerson. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF EASEMENT AS PETITIONED BY PAT SPAUDE Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the reading of publication #3444 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 8, and Tuesday, August 13, 1985. The petition s for the vacation of a 6' by 130' utility easement on property described as Lot 2, Block 2, Helland's Third Addition. Chairman Ebent explained that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the vacation of Park Lane as petitioned by Mr. Spaude in February of 1985. This created a new lot line and new utility easements along that line were established. The existing utility easement was overlooked at the time and Mr. Spaude cannot proceed with his building plans until the easement is vacated. Mr. Erickson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the vacation as requested. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hwang. Discussion followed regarding plans for a future street behind the lots in question. City Administrator Plotz explained that it was his understanding that there would be another street between 7th and 8th avenues rather than a central green area as once planned. The motion to recommend approval of the petition to vacate the easement carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF STREET AS PETITIONED BY PURE CULTURE PRODUCTS Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. with the reading of publication #3445 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 8, and Tuesday, August 13, 1985. The request is to vacate the Washington Street right of way 39' south of the north property line of property abutting Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of Planning Commission Minutes - 8/20/85 Block 46 North 1/2 City. Staff recommended approval as the remaining 60' is adequate for a street. Mr. Torgerson stated that he had received notice from the Hutchinson Utilities Company that they would like an easement for a 6" gas main located southwest of the spur track; other than that, they have no objections to the request. Administrator Plotz explained that the request is to provide room for a loading dock for unloading raw materials. The new loading area would be a much safer area than they have at present as the material is flammable (alcohal). Chairman Ebent stated his concern about the fairness of granting such a vacation. He felt that it would be more fair to grant a 19.5' vacation, leaving the 60' required for a street and 19.5' for the property owners to the south, in the event that they might ask for a vacation. He also stated his concern about traffic going west on Washington driving into the wrong lane of oncoming traffic. Director Priebe stated that the street is used mainly by Pure Culture Products and Hutch Agri -Tech. There is only one residence on the south side of the street. Mr. Romo stated that he had no problem with the request because of the location. Mr. Erickson asked if a site plan could be provided. After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 7:54 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the vacation as requested, contingent upon the 6" easement for the gas main and any other necessary easements (railroad and/or City) provided, and upon a site plan of the proposed loading dock being provided for the City Council meeting. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried, with Chairman Ebent voting "no". (c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY GAIL PLAISANCE Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 7:55 p.m. with the reading of publication #3446 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 8, and Tuesday, August 13, 1985. The request is for a 19' variance to allow the construction of an attached double garage with living area 6' from the rearyard property line, and a variance to allow a 7' by 20' deck on the north side of the existing house on property located at 509 Linden Avenue. Mr. Gail Plaisance was present to explain that since he had discussed this with the Planning Commission (June meeting), the contractor had recommended that living space be added above the proposed garage. Other than that, the request was what had been discussed previously. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 8/20/85 Chairman Ebent explained that this situation was unusual due to the fact that the rearyard appeared as a sideyard. Mr. Romo commented that he thought 31' was a large garage. It was noted that the length wasn't affected by the variance because the required 6' on the sideyard was allowed. City Administrator Plotz stated that the staff recommendation was based upon the fact that the variance would allow the site to be more aesthetically pleasing. During discussion it was noted that by forcing a detached garage on the property by denying the variance would be defeating the purpose of having a more attractive site. The variance would not create a safety or health hazzard. After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:07 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the variance as requested. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF "SHADY HAVEN" AS PROPOSED BY RICHARD AND LINDA MARTIN Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:05 p.m. with the reading of publication #3447 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 8, and Tuesday, August 20, 1985, The propose pat is located on the west side of Shady Ridge Road and is described as "That part of the South Half of the South Half of Government Lot 2, Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, described as beginning at the southeast corner of said Government Lot 2; thence northerly along the east line of said Government Lot 2 to the northeast corner of said South Half of the South Half; thence South 88 degrees 07 minutes 43 seconds West, along the south line of the plat of SHADY RIDGE as said plat is monumented, to the easterly shore line of Campbell Lake (the north line of said South Half of the South Half is assumed to have a bearing of South 89 degrees 37 minutes 37 seconds West): thence southerly, along said shore line, to the south line of said Government Lot 2; thence easterly along said south line, to the point of beginning. Richard Martin was present to explain the proposal. He explained that the unusual contour of the property (ravines, low spots, etc.) allowed for only three building sites. He was aware of Director Priebe's memo outlining requirements for the subdivision agreement that will be required and stated they would be in compliance with those requirements. Mr. Ebent read a letter from the Utilities Commission asking for 10' utilities easements on all lot lines. It also stated that after the utilities are installed, if any lot lines change, the developer would bear the cost of moving utilities. Mr. Martin stated that they would provide the 10' easements as requested. After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:09 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 8/20/85 City Council approval of the preliminary and final plat with the 10' utility easements as requested, and contingent upon the subdivision agreement including the recommendations as per Director Priebe's memo. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AS REQUESTED BY SUMIKO NELSON Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:10 p.m. with the reading of publication #3448 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 8, and Tuesday, August 13, 1985. The request is for a 13.25 variance to allow the construction of an attached double garage 6' from the frontyard property line on property located at 476 Bluff Street North. Chairman Ebent read staff's recommendation for approval based upon unusual circumstances (steep hill), excessive boulevard width, and the fact that there are no long range plans for sidewalk. Mr. Torgerson commented that he had gone to look at the site and noted the very high hill and the fact that most of the garage would not be seen. He noted that this is the only lot served from the Bluff Street side and that the other homes get to their garages from the alley. Chairman Ebent noted his concern that the Commission may be setting a precedent by granting a variance to allow a garage 6' from the frontyard property line. It was noted that similar variances have already been granted. Mr. Romo stated that he felt the situation was unique because of the steep hi 11. He al so stated that the wide boul evard woul d al 1 ow enough room for off-street parking. Julie Schaefer was present to state that the existing situation would have to be corrected as the wall was giving way to allow rain and snow to run down into the house. She stated that maintenance was a problem for her mother, Mrs. Nelson. They did not feel that put- ting the garage in the back was a solution. After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the variance as requested. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously. 4. OLD BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN AS SUBMITTED BY GEORGE HERBERT TO THE COUNTY (WITHIN THE TWO MILE RADIUS) Director Priebe explained that he recommended approval of the concept of the sketch plan as it had been changed and was now being presented. He stated that when the Preliminary Plat is presented with more detail and contours they will be better able to review the possible water problems in the area. He noted that it would be some time before this would come into the City, but that roadway 4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 8/20/85 costs could be extensive. After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary sketch plan, with all stipulations as listed by Director Priebe. Seconded by Mr. Erickson, the motion carried unani- mously. (b) REVIEW OF MILLER TOWNHOUSE THIRD ADDITION Director Priebe presented the layouts of this P.U.D. as it was progressing. He noted some minor changes, as in the number of Units per building (2 rather than 3). 5. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF HASSAN HEIGHTS (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS) Director Priebe stated that they had completed the subdivision agreement with Mr. Herb Filk (developer) and it would be recorded with the final plat. He noted that this is the first such subdivision agreement with a developer outside the City limits. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat as presented. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously. (b) DISCUSSION OF SIGN REQUEST BY HENNEN FURNITURE City Administrator Plotz explained that Hennen Furniture had requested to put up a sign on their property on the south end of the City (near the Prairie House south) advertising their downtown business. As per City sign ordinance, the City had denied the permit. He further explained that the letter from Hennen Furniture explaining the request was to make the Planning Commission aware of their disagreement with the policy. (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST AS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY BY JIM HEIKES (within two mile radius) Director Priebe explained that Mr. Heikes is requesting a conditional use permit to allow retail sales (furniture) in the B-1 Highway Business District. The land use is compatible with what the City projects would happen in that area (C-4). After discussion, Mr. Erickson made a motion to recommend that the City state they have no objection to the land use (retail sales) as proposed. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously. (d) REVIEW OF PROPOSED PLANNING COMMISSION BUDGET FOR 1986 City Administrator Plotz presented the budget as proposed. After review, Mrs. Young made a motion to accept the proposed budget. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously. (e) REVIEW OF SECTION FIVE (5) SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE #466 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - 8/20/85 Director Priebe presented suggested changes for Section five. 5. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and the meeting was adjourned at 9:07 p.m. M