Loading...
03-26-2002 CCM MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MARCH 26, 2002 1. CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M. Vice President Mlmar called the meeting to order. Council Members present were Jim Haugen, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. Member absent was Mayor Marlin Torgerson. Also present were Gary Plotz, City Administrator and John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering /Public Works. 2. INVOCATION - Rev. Brian Brosz, of United Congregational Church, delivered the invocation. 3. MINUTES (a) REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 12,2002 (b) BID OPENING FROM MARCH 18, 2002 Minutes were approved as presented. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 7,2002 2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEAL TH CARE BOARD MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 19, 2002 3. PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM MEETING MINUTES FROM JANUARY 17, 2002 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 19,2002 5. CITY OF HUTCHINSON CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT FOR FEBRUARY 2002 6. CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 2002 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 01-304 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 ADDING LANGUAGE FOR A NEW ZONING DISTRICT NAMED "GATEWAY ZONING DISTRICT" (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION) 2. ORDINANCE NO. 02-307 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.01 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE REGARDING BUILDING CODE (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR MARCH 26, 2002) 3. ORDINANCE NO. 02-309 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HUTCHINSON CITY ORDINANCE SECTION 5.41 PERTAINING TO LIQUOR SALES AT SPORTS, CONVENTION OR CULTURAL F ACILITIES (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR MARCH 26, 2002) 4. RESOLUTION NO. 11902 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE OF BROXIDE ODOR CONTROL (c) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 1. CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO APPROVE A PROPOSED SITE CONTRACT AND SECURITY BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUESTED BY 3M COMPANY, 905 ADAMS STREET SE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11897) 2. CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY LARSON BUILDERS, APPLICANT, TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION ON A DETACHED GARAGE LOCATED AT 45 - 5TH AVENUE NW WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11898) (d) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ENTERING INTO PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT WITH VAN SICKLE, ALLEN & ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT TRAINING TOWER ( e) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF SHORT-TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR LITTLE CROW ARCHERY CLUB ON MARCH 9, 2003 (f) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE FOR RICHARD SEIPEL, DBA THE COUNTRY STOP, TO SELL PRODUCE FROM JUNE 15 -AUGUST 31, 2002 (g) RE-APPOINTMENT OF DEAN KIRCHOFF TO PLANNING COMMISSION THROUGH 2007 (h) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT FROM INNOVATIVE PRESENTATIONS FOR HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER (i) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR AND CLUB LICENSES FOR 2002 (j) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY RECYLCING PERMIT FOR CAN MAN 2 (k) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL FOR MARION GRAHAM TO ATTEND THE WASTEWATER LABORATORY EXAM WORKSHOP IN MANCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE FROM APRIL 19 - 22,2002 Item 4(b) 1 was pulled for further discussion. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve consent agenda with the exception of Item 4(b) 1. Motion carried unanimously. Kay Peterson stated that she was not comfortable with the language included in Ordinance No. 02-307 - the language being too restrictive. Duane Hoversten noted that due to the fact that a conditional use permit will need to be obtained to go ahead with any new construction or re-construction, he felt that this ordinance would need to be used as a tool. Mr. Hoversten also noted that the first few applicants will be "testing" the ordinance and that is the only way the City will know if it is working or if it needs to be yet improved. Jim Haugen was in agreement with Mr. Hoversten's comments. Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to approve Ordinance No. 02-307. A roll call vote was taken: Haugen - aye, Peterson - nay, Hoversten - aye, Mlinar - aye. The vote passed 3 to 1. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 6:30 P.M. 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 (a) LETTING NO.3, PROJECT NO. 02-04, 02-05, 02-06 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (RESOLUTION NO. 11899) John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works, presented before the Council. Mr. Rodeberg explained that neighborhood meetings have been held with each area. Mr. Rodeberg noted that a pavement management program is conducted for each proposed improvement area. A ranking system is applied to assess what sort of improvement should be made. Mr. Rodeberg noted that generally $2.5 - 3 million is typically spent on improvement projects each year. Mr. Rodeberg further noted that after estimates have been obtained from project contractors, notification is sent to each homeowner citing the exact amount that will be assessed to them. A second hearing will be held before the bids are awarded to the project contractors. Letting No.3 includes Oakland Ave and Juul Road. The Oakland Avenue proj ects incorporates a mill and overlay reconstruction. Mr. Rodeberg noted that there had been requests to include a walking path, however there simply is not ample room. Half of the costs of mill and overlay proj ects are covered by the City with the second half being assessed to the homeowners. Mr. Rodeberg also noted that the estimates provided to the homeowners are on the high side. The Juul Road project is a complete reconstruction project mainly due to many sewer failures. Mr. Rodeberg noted that a petition had been circulated requesting that the cost of the proj ect be reduced if it wouldn't be denied. The City will be paying for over half of the cost of this project. Mr. Rodeberg also noted that staff has been working with Mark Schnobrich, City Forester, to ensure the least amount of damage will be done to city trees. There are blocks on the south side that only have a sidewalk on a portion of the block. It is proposed to take out those sidewalks completely, to reduce the risk of liability. Ed Marsh, 596 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Marsh explained that this road has been reconstructed a few times since 1951. Mr. Marsh is on the comer of Merrill Street and Juul Road. Mr. Marsh feels that everything is in compliance and it does not need any further reconstruction. Mr. Rodeberg noted that the last time work was done was in 1973. Steve Cook, 728 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Cook expressed that there is a lack of good information being presented to the homeowners as to why this project needs to be done. Mr. Cook feels that there should be some type of visual aid to show the underground road from in the past to now to compare the amount of deterioration. Mr. Cook also feels that not enough information was provided to show why there were septic failures and what the cause was. Mr. Cook noted that there is a wide age range of residents on Juul Road and that the younger families may be more prone to be in approval of this project as opposed to the more senior homeowners. Mr. Cook would like to see more options available to the senior citizens for a deferred assessment program. Mr. Cook feels that overall there was no good information provided to the residents to compare work that needs to be done. John Rodeberg responded by noting that it is difficult to define the amount of information to provide, due to the vast amount that is available and each homeowner may have a different preference as to how much they would like to know. However, separate meetings could be held to provide more specific information. Jack Sandberg, 571 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Sandberg feels that the street portion and the sidewalk portion seem to be in fine form. Mr. Sandberg questioned whether or not the amount of the street reconstruction could be reduced. Mr. Sandberg questioned Mr. Rodeberg on funding available for street improvements from the State. Mr. Rodeberg noted that there is state money available, however it is unavailable for use on reducing assessments. Mark Schnobrich, City Forester, presented before the Council. Mr. Schnobrich noted that 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 there has been some decline in the health of the trees on Juul Road due to disease and root problems, as well as aging deterioration. Mr. Schnobrich noted that healthy trees would not be removed, however the "sick" and "aged" trees would be those considered. Mr. Schnobrich noted that approximately eight trees would be removed due to aging. Another five or six would be removed due to being very near a water shutoff. Cindy Sandberg, 571 Juul Road, presented on behalf of her neighbors across the street that were not able to be present. Ms. Sandberg raised concerns regarding the inconvenience of the construction work during the project. Ms. Sandberg also raised concerns regarding Juul Road being a truck route. Ms. Sandberg requested that the project be postponed one year. Mr. Rodeberg noted that school buses do not have to follow truck routes. Mr. Rodeberg noted that the project would last approximately five-six months and he agreed with her that it is a "mess" during that time to go in and out of driveways. Vern Erble, 729 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Mr. Erble expressed that he felt the cost of this project could be reduced considerably by assessing each area individually. John Rodeberg noted that "patching" work has been done on other projects throughout the city, however it is not the most desirable method. Mr. Rodeberg agreed that Juul Road is "on the border" for complete reconstruction, but the decision was mainly due to the many sewer failures. Marcia Yetzer, 546 Juul Road, presented before the Council. Ms. Yetzer questioned whether or not parking would be restricted on one side ofthe street ifthe plan is for it to be narrowed. John Rodeberg stated that there are not plans to ban parking on one side of the street but possibly incorporate alternate methods to slow the traffic down. Merrill Johnson, Juul Road, expressed that he doesn't feel that there is a need to reconstruct the street and that the homeowners will not reap any benefits from this project. Mr. Johnson asked for alternatives to be considered to upgrade the street. John Rodeberg noted that separate cutting could be considered and only those sidewalks will be replaced that needed to be removed. Mike Meyer, 717 Juul Road, explained that he had concerns regarding the narrowing of the street. John Rodeberg recommended continuing the hearing on April 23, then hold another neighborhood meeting and consider conducting sewer work only with no reconstruction to the road surface. John Mlinar noted that, according to a petition, three homeowners were in approval of the project and approximately 22 homeowners were opposed to the project. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson, to defer this hearing until April 23 , 2002. Motion carried unanimously. (b) LETTING NO.4, PROJECT NO. 02-07, 02-08, 02-09, 02-13, 02-14 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (RESOLUTION NO. 11900) John Rodeberg explained that this project is on Milwaukee Avenue, Goebel Street and Goebel Circle. The project is being requested for deferment to a future year. The Civic Arena project and miscellaneous street and sidewalk maintenance improvements will be transferred to another Letting No. Greg Curry, 955 Milwaukee Avenue, presented before the Council. Mr. Curry requested that earlier notifications be sent out, as opposed to only months before the project. 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 Tom Kern, 990 Goebel Circle, questioned why these projects are being proposed to be dropped from the improvement list. John Rodeberg explained that some projects need to be dropped each year. Mr. Rodeberg also stated that no residents had informed him that they had a great interest in going forward with this project. Mr. Rodeberg also stated that the amount of maintenance that has been applied in the past will not be applied in the future due to the deterioration of the street. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten, to close the public hearing. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to remove No. 02-07, 02-08, and 02-09 from the 2002 Improvement List. Motion carried unanimously. (c) LETTING NO.5, PROJECT NO. 02-10,02-11,02-12 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (RESOLUTION NO. 11901) Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten, to open the public hearing. Motion carried unanimously. John Rodeberg explained that this project includes Elm Street, Oak Street and 9th Avenue NE. Mr. Rodeberg explained the process used before the actual bids are awarded to begin construction work, as well as the payment process of the assessments. Elm Street is being proposed for full reconstruction work. Mr. Rodeberg explained the main concern in this area amongst residents is the off-street trail. Mr. Rodeberg noted that most comments received were that the road did need to be reconstructed, however there were also several safety issues on the street. Therefore, staff is proposing a trail. Mr. Rodeberg is recommending that more neighborhood meetings be held regarding the proposed trail before any further action is taken. Mr. Rodeberg requested that this item be deferred to April 9, 2002. Mr. Rodeberg also noted that it is being proposed to add angle parking along Northwoods Park, as well as other safety improvements near the park. Gene Chrast, 76 North High Drive, presented before the Council. Mr. Chrast made note that there is no representation from the Council that lives in this neighborhood. Mr. Chrast raised concerns that no proper or timely notification was given to the area residents. Mr. Chrast also requested that utility lines be buried before work is complete. Mr. Chrast has concerns with the maintenance ofthe bituminous trail that is proposed. He also raised issues of privacy and liability. Mr. Chrast presented a petition to the Council signed by an overwhelming majority of the residents along Elm Street that do not want to go ahead with this project. Robert Schwanke, 874 Elm Street, raised concerns regarding the removal of trees if the street needs to be widened. Approximately 45 trees would need to be removed. Mr. Schwanke also raised concerns regarding the trail running immediately in front of the homeowners' property and invading privacy. Mr. Schwanke also raised several traffic safety issues. Mr. Schwanke's main concern is property value decreasing. John Rodeberg did note that during the second neighborhood meeting the City Forester and Park Director will be available to answer further questions regarding the trail and trees. Gene Chrast requested that no second meeting be held due to the fact that a petition has already been signed opposing the trail. John Rodeberg noted that he wanted all the residents to have full and accurate information regarding the proposal. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 Jerry Specht, 724 Elm Street, publicly opposed the bike path/trail. Paul Otte, 410 Elm Street, opposed the bike path/trail proposal. Mr. Otte noted that the distance from his garage to the curb is 30 feet. If the street would be widened, the trail would only be 18 feet from his house. Mr. Otte is more in favor of sidewalks as opposed to a trail. He does not feel that safety issues will be necessarily taken care of with this proposal. Mr. Otte expressed that he does feel the path would decrease his property value. John Rodeberg stated that he is all in favor of dropping the trail proposal if the residents are not in favor of it, however, safety issues need to be addressed. Mr. Rodeberg also noted that two five-foot sidewalks would narrow the street even more than what is stated in the proposal. Kay Peterson noted that the petition is requesting that the entire project be dropped. Grace Chrast noted that she drafted the petition and the intent of the petition was only to be opposing the trail, not the entire project. Marc Sebora, City Attorney, noted that the petition will be read as all signators are opposed to the entire project, and the process would need to be started over again, with the proposal only including street improvements (excluding the trail). An acceptable alternative would be to defer this item until a future meeting and then have a second petition presented to approve the project, excluding the trail project. Paul Otte noted that the majority of the residents on Elm Street agree that the surface of the road does need to be repaired, however do not narrow the road, reduce parking, create a trail, etc. Kay Peterson noted that something needs to be submitted to counteract the signed petition. Jerry Specht proposed a show of hands of Elm Street residents opposing the trail. The Oak Street woject is proposed as a complete reconstruction project. The area between Oakwood and 9 will be removed from the project. Carol Lang questioned whether or not this includes College Avenue. John Rodeberg noted that it is sewer line only on College Avenue and no street assessments will be applied. Ms. Lang questioned why the assessments on Elm Street are so high. Mr. Rodeberg noted that bituminous costs are high due to high oil costs. The 9th Avenue Project encompasses curb, gutter and street improvements as well as the trunk storm sewer, however the trunk storm sewer is paid by the city. Only street between curb and gutter or the sidewalk is going to be considered. Brian Jager, Oak Street, voiced that he feels Oak Avenue is in fine condition. He feels that scrapping the project and only improving sewer lines is far-fetched. Lee Salmi, 4 - 9th Avenue NE, presented before the Council. Mr. Salmi noted that the main problem with the storm sewer is that Maplewood Academy uses the 9th Avenue power takeoff. Mr. Salmi feels that ifthe Academy was not allowed to use the power takeoff, there would be no problems. Mr. Salmi noted that no resurfacing has been done in 32 years. Mr. Salmi voiced an objection to reconstructing the curbs if only to put in new storm systems. John Rodeberg noted that typically maintenance overlays are not done due to lack of funds and the city prefers to incorporate projects into a one-time project. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to continue the hearing to April 9, 2002. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve Project 02-13 and 02-14. Motion 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 carried unanimously. John Mlinar thanked all of the residents for being present at the public hearing. Mr. Mlinar also thanked city staff for all the work done on these proposed projects. John Rodeberg reminded the public that the purpose of all the meetings is to meet the residents' needs and not to impose any of these projects on any homeowners. 6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) UPDATE ON HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER Dolf Moon, Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Education, introduced the committee members that worked on various aspects ofthe Event Center project. Mr. Moon also noted that members of the Senior Advisory Board were available to present a check to the City of Hutchinson in the amount of $70,000.00 as a contribution to the Event Center. Mr. Pollmann, Senior Advisory Board, presented the check to the City Council. Mr. Moon further explained the various marketing activities that have taken place to promote the Event Center. Matt McMillian and Tom Wirt, Event Center Committee members, presented on the Event Center web site. Items located on the web site include room sizes and rates, a rental application, miscellaneous forms, a map of the facility and of the city of Hutchinson, vendors, events, programs, etc. Keith Enstad, Convention & Visitors Bureau, stated that in his opinion this will be an "easy sell" to potential customers. Mr. Enstad explained that already several meetings and conventions have already booked at the Event Center. DolfMoon explained that a large asset ofthe Event Center is the fact that the seniors will be there every day and holding dally activities. Mr. Moon expressed that the Event Center will be able to house multiple events from weddings to reunions to large meetings. Duane Hoversten thanked the Event Center Committee and the seniors that put all the hard work into this project. (b) UPDATE ONHDR WATER TREATMENT STUDY John Rodeberg, Director of Engineer/Public Works, explained that an early study had been conducted by Earth Tech on the Water Treatment Plant. HDR is a consultmg firm that was brought in to review the information provided by Earth Tech. A representative from HDR presented before the Council. The representative stated that some sort of change will need to be made to the Water Treatment Plant due to tightening regulations. The main drivers of changes needing to be made to the Water Plant include corrosion control, ammonia removal and iron/manganese removal. The representative explained that the Hutchinson Water Treatment Plant is facing unique changes due to the fact that all of these factors need to be taken care of at the same time. Dr. Steve Ryber, HDR, presented before the Council. Mr. Rybar conducted a forensic assessment on copper corrosion at the Water Treatment Plant. Mr. Ryber noted that copper leaching is occurring from household tubing, and the US Environmental Protection Agency claims that this is a very important issue. The copper release rates in Hutchinson are higher than the EP A allows. Dr. Ryber detailed the studies conducted to show the actual amount of copper within the water system. Roger Nowak, HDR, presented before the Council. Mr. Nowak presented the options 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 available to take care of the copper leaching. The options presented were 1) corrosion control only, 2) biofiltration - modifY existing facility, 3) biofiltration - new facility and 4) reverse osmosis. Mr. Nowak stated that the first two options would not improve the existing plant, due to the fact that the facility is approaching 20 years old. EarthTech had presumed the same options for treatment. Mr. Nowak stated that reverse osmosis would be the most expensive option, with a new facility costing half of the amount of reverse osmosis. The first two options would get the plant up to code, however the age of the facility would still be at issue. John Rodeberg stated that the next step is to do further testing and to also consider taste of the water and aesthetics of the plant. A final report will be issued to the City by HDR within the next week or so. 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 02-308 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HUTCHINSON CITY ORDINANCE SECTION 10.47 TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR THE LICENSING OF EXCA V A TORS (SET SECOND READING AND ADOPTION FOR APRIL 9, 2002) John Rodeberg requested that this item be deferred for two weeks. An additional ordinance is being drafted regarding right-of-ways and will tie into this proposed ordinance. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to defer this item until April 9, 2002. Motion carried unanimously. 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATIONFORAPPROV AL OF CHANGE ORDERNO. 4 FOR HUTCHINSON EVENT CENTER Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen, to approve Change Order No.4 for Hutchinson Event Center. Motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF CHANGING AMOUNT OF SPENDING AUTHORITY FOR HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Duane Hoversten noted that the amount being requested is $50,000 that the HAHC Board may approve without seeking City Council approval. Mr. Hoversten noted that with the cost of health care items today as opposed to 30 years ago, this is much in line as to what is needed. Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to approve the spending amount be increased to $50,000 for the Hutchinson Area Health Care Board. Motion carried unanimously. 9. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS Marc Sebora - Mr. Sebora noted that re-districting had taken place and that the County Commissioners are required to have 20% representation of each area. A proposal will be made to the City Council to realign the precinct boundaries so that an even amount of percentages is spread between the County Commissioners. The reason to realign the precinct boundanes is due to the fact that townships may not be divided or split. Gary Plotz noted that Precinct 2 has had the largest amount of growth within the City. Mr. Plotz noted that if there are minor changes in district boundaries, there is no need for a county election. To be in compliance with the redistricting guidelines, approximately 174 people would need to be added to Precinct 3. By doing this, the Commissioners' representation of each area would be more evenly distributed. Mr. Plotz further noted that the City has the authority to 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 26, 2002 change the boundary lines. Mr. Plotz stated that he would provide the media with maps and boundary guidelines, as well as hold a public hearing the end of April. Mr. Plotz stated that advertisements and a public hearing must be held by the end of April. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve advertising for and setting a public hearing for 6:00 p.m. on April 23, 2002. MotiOn carried unanimously. John Mlinar - John Mlinar noted that two free batteries are available for smoke detectors, sponsored by 3M. The batteries can be picked up from the fire station. Kay Peterson - Kay Peterson request that Connie Lambert and Newt Potter be re-appointed to the Hutchinson Public Library Board. Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to re-appoint Connie Lambert and Newt Potter to the Hutchinson Public Library Board. There is also an opening on the Pioneerland Library System Board. Duane Hoversten - Duane Hoversten noted that the HRA Board was given a $600,000 grant for the Franklin-Grove Improvement Project. Gary Plotz - Gary Plotz summarized the discussion held this morning at the Team Leadership Meeting. The items discussed were as follows: acquiring additional parkland, HDR Water Treatment Study, Industrial Park expansion, marketing ofliquor beverages at the Event Center, and liquor store expansion. John Rodeberg - John Rodeberg requested that an advertisement for bids for the fire training tower be approved. Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve advertisement for bids for the Public Safety Training Tower. Motion carried unammously. 10. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A Motion by Peterson, second by Hoverten, to approve and authorize payment of V erified Claims A from appropriate funds. Motion carried unanimously. 11. ADJOURN With no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. 9