Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp06-24-86 cHUTCH INSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
June 22 TO June 28
1986
WEDNESDAY
-25-
10:00 A.M. - Directors
Meeting at
City Hall
SUNDAY ' MONDAY TUESDAY
_Y2_ -23- -24-
WATER CARNIVAL PARADE
r
:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at City
Hall
THURSDAY FRIDAY I SATURDAY
-26_ _27_ -28-
5:30 P.M. - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
VACATION:
GARY PLOTZ - June 23 - July 4
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
IMF
TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 1986
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.N.
2. Invocation - Representative of Ministerial Association
3. Consideration of Minutes - Bid Opening of May 15, 1986 and Regular Meeting
of June 10, 1986
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - May 1986
2. Hospital Board Minutes dated May 20, 1986
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated May 20, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to order minutes and report filed
�Allk
"® (b) Consideration of Appointment:
1. Nursing Home Board - Ancher Nelsen
Action - Motion to ratify appointment
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
None
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Consideration of Request By Police Chief To Attend Annual IACP
Conference October 4 -9, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
(b) Consideration of Petition For 'Caution - Children' Signs At Echo Circle
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve signs
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 8302 - Transferring $8,852 From Public Sites Trust Fund
To Recreation And Pool Construction Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1986
(b) Resolution No. 8307 - Resolution Authorizing Dispatch And Use Of City
Equipment And Services By city Administrator In Emergency Situations
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(c) Resolution No. 8306 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(d) Resolution No. 8312 - Resolution Rejecting Improvement - Assessment
Roll No. 205
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(e) Resolution No. 8313 - Resolution Rejecting Improvement - Project
No. 85 -01 -24
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(f) Resolution No. 8314 - Resolution Rejecting Improvement - Assessment
Roll No. 217
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
"d1k�
(g) Resolution No. 8315 - Resolution Rejecting Improvement - Project ��-
No. 86 -07
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(h) Resolution No. 8316 - Resolution Authorizing Release Of Securities To
First National Bank of Hutchinson, Minnesota -
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(i) Ordinance No. 12/86 - An Ordinance Amending Section 6.03 Of Zoning
Ordinances Of The City Of Hutchinson Entitled 'The Zoning Board Of
Appeals"
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(j) Ordinance No. 15/86 - An Ordinance Amending Section 6.05 Of The Zoning
Ordinances Of The City Of Hutchinson Entitled 'variances'
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(k) Ordinance No. 16/86 - An Ordinance Amending Section 6.08 Of The Zoning
Ordinances Of The City Of Hutchinson Entitled "Public Hearings'
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
1,
F,
is
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1986
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Request By Junker Sanitation For Rate Increase
(DEFERRED JUNE 10, 1986)
Action -
(b1 Consideration Of Plan For Cul-de -Sac And Drive On East Freemont For
Greencastle Project (DEFERRED JUNE 10, 1986)
Action -
(c) Consideration Of Bids For Group Health Insurance (DEFERRED 6- 10-86)
Action -
(d) Consideration Of Bids For Group Life Insurance (DEFERRED 6- 10 -86)
Action
(e) Consideration Of Lawsuit Settlement For City Of Hutchinson Ys. Randall
Reid (Fire Truck Accident)
Action -
(f) Consideration Of Water Service Repair For Mike's Mobil North
Action -
(g) Consideration Of Additional Study By RCM For Water Needs Update
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve cost for study
9. New Business
(a) Consideration Of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration Of Approval To Remodel Hospital Business Office
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) Consideration Of Property And Casualty Insurance Renewal
Action -
7
(d)
Consideration Of
Subdivision
Agreement
For Taradiddle Acres
Action - Motion
to reject -
Notion to
approve subdivision agreement
7
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1986
(e) Consideration Of Subdivision Agreement For Stillings-Hoeft Addition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve subdivision agreement
(f) Consideration Of Subdivision Agreement For Northern View Acres
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve subdivision agreement
(g) Consideration Of Splitting Lot 7, Block 1, Schmidtbauer's Second
Addition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve splitting lot
(h) Consideration Of Request For Deferred Assessments On Improvements In
Place For Lot 6 Of Padens First Addition
Action -
(i) Consideration Of Drainage Improvements For Robert's First Addition
Action -
(j) Consideration Of Whether Or Not To Research A Rental Housing Ordinance
Action -
(k) Consideration Of Woodridge Preliminary Plat Submitted By Pat Mikulecky
And Kevin Compton With Favorable Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8309
(t) Consideration Of Preliminary Plat Of Plaza Heights Submitted By
Citizen's Bank Of Gibbon, State Bank Of Morgan And First State Bank Of
Brownton (Larry Herrmann And Dennis Albertson) With Favorable
Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8310
(m) Consideration Of Vacation Of Portion Of Colorado Street As Petitioned
By Tyrone Helland With Unfavorable Recommendation Of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve vacation
(n) Consideration Of Final Plat Of Stillings -Hoeft Addition With Favorable
Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 8311
4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 24, 1986
(o) Consideration Of Sketch Plan As Submitted By Donald Sitz To County
(Within Two Mile Radius) With No Objection From Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to recommend to County with no
objection
(p) Consideration Of Final Plat Of Taradiddle Acres Submitted To County
(Within Two Mile Radius) With No Objection From Planning Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Motion to recommend to County with no
objection
(q) Consideration Of Final Plat Of Northern View Acres Submitted To County
(Within Two Mile Radius) With No Objection From Planning Commission
Action - Notion to reject - Motion to recommend to County with no
objection
(r) Consideration Of Vacation Of Utility Easements As Petitioned By Gary
Miller With Favorable Recommendation Of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve vacation and waive first
reading of Ordinance and set second reading July 8, 1986
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
5
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 1986
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman Marlin Torgerson, Alderman
Pat Mikulecky, and Mayor Paul L. Ackland. Absent: Alderman John Mlinar.
Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering
Marlow V. Priebe, and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of May 27, 1986 were approved as amended
on page 10; the bid opening of May 20, 1986 and Board of Review of June 5,
1986 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES DATED MAY 12, 1986
• 2. HOSPITAL BOARD MINUTES DATED APRIL 15, 1986
3. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES DATED APRIL 16, 1986
4. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - APRIL 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to order the report and minutes filed. Motion unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT:
1. POLICE COMMISSION - JEFF HAAG
Alderman Carls moved to ratify the appointment of Jeff Haag. Motion
seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 86 -08
Mayor Ackland called the public hearing to order at 8:20 P.M. and read
the public hearing notice for project No. 86 -08.
No one was present regarding the improvement project. Alderman Torger-
son moved to close the hearing at 8:21 P.M. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Carls and unanimously carried.
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
0
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to approve project No. 86 -08 and waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8295. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 217 - IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 86 -07 (LETTING NO. 7)
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8 :22 P.M. and read the
public hearing notice.
The Council had received a petition signed by residents in the area who
objected to draining the Maplewood Academy property into the city storm
sewer on Ninth Avenue Northeast. Mr. Darrell Sumnerfield acted as
spokesman on their behalf. He presented pictures of evidence which
showed the water problems in the area. Mr. Summerfield stated the
storm sewer system was not adequate to handle the water situation.
Mr. Lyndon Furst, Principal of Maplewood Academy, reported the Academy
had requested use of lateral one of the ditch 18 system from the
County. The school would like to have its water drained, but they do
not want to cause other residents to have flooding as a result.
A lady living at 835 Oak stated an employee from the City water depart-
ment told her it was a 'once in a life -time occurrence" when it rained •
so hard in May and caused flooding of basements and yards. She dis-
agreed and stated the problem existed frequently.
Alderman Carls inquired where the water would drain if Maplewood Acad-
emy developed the farm land. The City Engineer stated that an adequate
storm drainage was required for development. He suggested that addi-
tional storm sewers be put in. Engineer Priebe commented that under a
429 project, it was questionable if the County could be assessed for
part of the cost.
Principal Furst reported the County had told him the City had cut the
access; therefore, they were responsible to restore the service. En-
gineer Priebe stated that a developer had cut the access line.
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to close the hearing at 8:50 P.M. Motion unanimously carried.
Alderman Carls moved to reject project No. 86 -07. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
City Attorney Schaefer was directed to meet with the County Attorney to
try to resolve the water drainage problem.
(c) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 216 - IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 86 -06 (LETTING NO. 6)
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:51 P.M. and read the •
public hearing notice.
`:
0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
Alderman Torgerson reported he had been contacted by Rev. Tim Maland,
855 Spruce in Hillcrest Addition, regarding his assessment. The owner
was being assessed for the long side of a corner lot, but he owned two
lots. The second lot was sub - standard and unbuildable with a 44 foot
frontage.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to close the hearing at 8:59 P.M. Motion unanimously carried.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve Assessment Roll No. 216, with the
exception of the unbuildable lot of Rev. Tim Maland, and to waive read-
ings and adopt Resolutions No. 8296 and No. 8297. Motion seconded by
Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON DRUG STORE TO HOLD SIDEWALK SALE
ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 1986
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson, and unanimously carried to approve the request.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON JAYCEE WATER CARNIVAL FOR NON-
INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SATURDAY, JUNE 21 AND SUNDAY,
JUNE 22 AT ROBERTS PARK AND ALSO SUNDAY, JUNE 22 AT FAIRGROUNDS, WITH
FEE WAIVED
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve the request, with the
fee waived and the restrictions placed by the Police Department. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CITIZENS BANK & TRUST TO USE PUBLIC SQUARE
FOR WEEKEND OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1986
After discussion, it was moved by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman
Torgerson, and unanimously carried, to approve the request.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY COUNTY CHAPEL (FIRST APOSTOLIC CHURCH) TO
USE LIBRARY PARK AND BAND SHELL WITH ELECTRICAL ON SATURDAY, JUNE 28
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, sec-
onded by Alderman Carls, to approve the request. Motion carried unani-
mously.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 14/86 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1015 OF THE
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED "DOGS"
• A petition was received from residents in the Rose Lane and Fifth
Avenue Northeast area of town regarding the nuisance of barking dogs.
El
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
City Attorney Schaefer reported the present ordinance on dogs did not
specifiy "barking" dogs as a nuisance so it was impossible for the
Police Department to prosecute the owners. He then explained how the
proposed amendment to the ordinance would remedy the situation. The
public nuisance of barking dogs would become a misdemeanor offense with
a maximum of 90 days in jail, $700 fine, or both, by the owner.
After discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to waive the first reading
of Ordinance No. 14/86 and to set the second reading for the special
Council meeting on June 16, 1986. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls
and unanimously carried.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 8305 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8305. Motion carried unani-
mously.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 8304 - RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE AND PAYMENT
SCHEDULE FOR 1986 ASSESSMENT ROLLS NUMBERS 208, 209, 210, 211, 212,
213, 214, 215, 216 AND 217
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8304,
establishing the interest rate at 6.2 %. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 8303 - TRANSFERRING $162,207 FROM 1986 SPECIAL
ASSESSMENT BOND FUND TO GENERAL FUND FOR ENGINEERING AND ADMINISTRATION
FEES
It was moved by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8303. Motion unanimously car-
ried.
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 8302 - TRANSFERRING $8,852 FROM PUBLIC SITES TRUST FUND
TO RECREATION & POOL CONSTRUCTION FUND
Alderman Torgerson moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8302. The motion was seconded by Alderman Mikulecky. Following dis-
cussion, the motion and second were withdrawn.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to defer to the next Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
(f) RESOLUTION NO. 8301 - TRANSFERRING $20,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL
FUND
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8301.
Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
4
•
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING AS REQUESTED BY CITY STAFF (WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT SITE) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls to waive
the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 738. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF MERIT RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR
(DEFERRED MAY 27, 1986)
Alderman Torgerson moved to recommend a one percent merit increase for
the City Administrator. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING CONCERNING
RAILROAD SPUR LINE AND CONNECTOR TRACK
Engineer Priebe reported on possible problems for the railroad con-
struction and additional costs that were not anticipated. Slope grad-
ing was added, and the gravel base is ready to be put on. No action
was taken.
• 9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SURVEY OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES BY BUILDING DEPARTMENT
The Assistant Building Official, Jim Marka, reported the figures in the
survey were based on 1982 fees; however, there will be an increase in
1986. It was his recommendation that the City maintain the 1982 fee
schedule.
During discussion, Alderman Carls suggested the Building Department
contact other cities in the state with a population of 9- 11,000 to se-
cure a survey of their building fees. Alderman Mikulecky was directed
to work with the Building Department for a recommendation to the Coun-
cil. No action taken.
RECESS: The City Council adjourned for a 10 minute break at 9:40 P.M.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVE-
MENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR PROJECT NO. 86 -09
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded
by Alderman Mikulecky, to approve the engineer's report, waive read-
ing and adopt Resolution No. 8300 ordering plans and specifications.
Motion unanimously carried.
• (c) ITEM DELETED FROM AGENDA
(d) ITEM DELETED FROM AGENDA
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
(e) ITEM DELETED FROM AGENDA
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS OF POLICE CHIEF AND CITY FORESTER CONCERNING
UNSIGHTLY PROPERTIES
City Attorney Schaefer discussed a revision of the City ordinance which
would prohibit the parking of semi - trucks or old cars on the street.
Alderman Torgerson moved to refer to the City Attorney a review of the
public nuisance ordinance for revision. Motion seconded by Alderman
Carls and carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY JUNKER SANITATION FOR A RATE INCREASE
City Administrator Plotz reported that Junker Sanitation was requesting
a $3.00 landfill increase and a total increase of $5.50. Following
lengthy discussion of the City's contract with Junker Sanitation, and
specifically page four regarding the landfill rate increase, the motion
was made by Alderman Mikulecky to increase the rate increase by $1.00
per month in complying with the contract that states the increase wi11
be identical with landfill rates and County figures of one cubic yard
per month accumulated. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and failed,
with Aldermen Carls and Mikulecky voting aye and Alderman Torgerson and
Mayor Ackland voting nay.
Alderman Torgerson moved to defer action to the June 24 Council meet-
ing. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
The City Administrator was directed to contact Junker Sanitation for
information regarding his costs, insurance, etc.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF PLAN FOR CUL -DE -SAC AND DRIVE ON EAST FREEMONT FOR
GREENCASTLE PROJECT
Mr. Newell Weed, developer of the Greencastle project, requested the
Council to consider a parking lot in lieu of a cul -de -sac at the end of
Freemont Avenue. The City would be given an easement for emergency
vehicles and, if there was additional future development, Greencastle
would put in a cul -de -sac.
It was noted that the City Council minutes of June 11, 1985 read that a
Greencastle was to provide a cul -de -sac at the Greencastle site.
City Attorney Schaefer suggested two separate easements from Green-
castle: 1. Easement for the use of the parking lot as proposed for
emergency vehicles; 2. An easement that would allow the City to put in
a cul -de -sac at some future time.
Mr. Robert Stearns stated that the Owners Association would be respon-
sible for costs after all the units are sold, but until such time, the
builder would be assessed.
E
u
•
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
Engineer Priebe suggested that the parking lot be built to conform to a
future cul -de -sac.
Alderman Torgerson moved to accept the proposals as presented, with two
easements that were discussed. The motion failed for lack of a second.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by the Mayor, to
accept the plan as presented, with requested easements of City Engineer
if a future cul -de -sac was required. Alderman Torgerson and Mayor Ack-
land voted aye and Aldermen Carls and Mikulecky voted nay. The motion
failed.
Mr. Weed requested to work with the City Attorney and City Engineer to
prepare a new proposal for the Council.
Alderman Torgerson moved to defer the item to the June 24 meeting to
allow Mr. Weed time to work out something with the City Engineer and
City staff. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY NEWELL WEED TO SPREAD DIRT ON CEMETERY
PROPERTY
Following discussion, the moti -on was made by Alderman Carls, that based
on the recommendations of City staff, to deny the request. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE (DEFERRED 5- 15 -86)
Alderman Carls moved to defer action. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF BIDS FOR GROUP LIFE INSURANCE (DEFERRED 5- 15 -86)
Alderman Carls moved to defer action. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF CALLING FOR BIDS AND SETTING BID OPENING DATE FOR
JULY 17, 1986 AT 2:00 P.M. FOR DENTAL INSURANCE
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson, to call for bids on dental insurance and open bids
July 17, 1986 at 2:00 P.M. Motion unanimously carried.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING FOR MONDAY, JUNE
16 AT 9:00 P.M. FOR FOLLOW -UP TO PLANNING COMMISSION ITEM(S)
It was moved by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls, to ap-
prove the special City Council meeting date of June 16, 1986 at 9:00
P.M. Motion carried unanimously.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING CITY POLICY HANDBOOK
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
Following discussion of the revised policies in the handbook, the mo- •
tion was made by Alderman Carls to adopt the manual with the two
changes mentioned: deleting the section regarding Employment Hiring
Procedure and the second to last sentence under Personnel Records
Keeping. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously car-
ried.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR HELLANDS SEVENTH ADDITION
After discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the subdivision
agreement for Helland's Seventh Addition. Alderman Carls seconded the
motion and unanimously carried.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF COMMUNICATION FROM CITY ATTORNEY RELATIVE TO
UNFINISHED ITEMS
City Attorney Schaefer reported he had submitted a written response to
the City Administrator for distribution to the Council for future dis-
cussion and explanation at the June 16 special meeting.
Alderman Carls moved to defer consideration of the communication from
the City Attorney to the meeting of June 16, 1986. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(q) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR 60 -DAY EXTENSION OF STARTING DATE FOR •
CONSTRUCTION OF RAILROAD CONNECTOR TRACK AND ELEVATOR SPUR LINE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, sec-
onded by Alderman Carls, that due to circumstances beyond the company's
control, to give a 60 -day extension. Motion unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reviewed items listed on the Administrative
Update. He pointed out that Florence Satterlee had offered the City
the purchase of additional property adjacent to the Satterlee pit. It
was recommended by Alderman Carls that the Maintenance Operations Di-
rector review the property and determine if the City had a need for it.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland commented on the weed notices and asked if there was a
set price charged for the City cutting grass on private property. He
suggested the fee should be high enough to discourage repeats each
year. An administrative fee should be added to the amount paid the
contractor.
A motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku-
lecky, that there be a $50 surcharge to cover administrative costs plus
6]
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
the cost of mowing. Motion unanimously carried.
The City Administrator was requested to find out the status of the air-
port appraisals.
Mayor Ackland inquired if the newly appointed Police Station Building
Construction Committee had held a meeting.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS
Alderman Carls inquired about the follow -up regarding the open park
shelter building at North Jaycee Park. The City Administrator will
provide a report at the next City Council meeting.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson asked about an answer to Mike's Mobil regarding the
repair of the water service line. Following discussion, Alderman Carls
moved to defer this matter to the next Council meeting. Motion second-
ed by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky commented on the letter in the Council packet from
Hutchinson Computers, Inc. requesting improvements on Third Avenue
Northwest. He directed the City Administrator to find out if the com-
pany still wanted to follow through on the request.
It was asked when the Nemitz parking lot would be completed. City En-
gineer Priebe responded it would be done as soon as possible.
Alderman Mikulecky suggested that in the 1987 budget process to keep
the dollars for 1987 the same as the amount of money spent in 1986 and
request the department heads to list other requests beyond that amount.
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
City Attorney Schaefer stated he had submitted a memorandum in answer
to the previous discussion on sump pumps. He had received several
ordinances of other cities from the League of Minnesota Cities. The
only way to enforce the ordinance would be to terminate water service
if someone was in violation of the ordinance.
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Priebe inquired about the overlay project from Ninth Avenue
Northeast and referred to Maplewood Academy's water problem. After
discussion, it was the Council's consensus to delay action at this time
-for an overlay project.
The Commissioner of Streets was asked to work with the City Engineer on
E
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 10, 1986
the Greencastle cul -de -sac issue.
The Director of Engineering reported that Greencastle had not been
charged a park and playground contribution for its dwelling units. It
was his recommendation to refer it to the Parks & Recreation Board and
City Attorney for review.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to approve the claims and authorize payment from the appropriate funds.
Motion unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11 :25 P.M.
0
fG
MINUTES
BID OPENING
THURSDAY, MAY 15, 1986
The bid opening was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 2:00 P.M. Present were:
Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, Consultant James
Mandel, and Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
Publication No. 3542, Advertisement for Bids, Group Health And Life Insurance
Proposals, was read in part. The attached bids were opened and read.
The bids were referred to the City staff and Consultant Mandel for a recommen-
dation to the City Council.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:45 P.M.
0
is
N
s s
BID TABULATION
LIFE INSURANCE /AD &D /HEALTH INSURANCE
May 15, 1986 - 2:00 P.M.
0
CARRIER
LIFE INSURANCE -
BURNS 11ANOR /CITY
AMP -
BURNS MANOR /CITY
GROUP HEALTII -
(I ENTITIES)
HEALTH
CITY OP IIUTC11INSON
HEALTII
BIIRNS )IANOR
11EA1.111
SOLE- FORDED
S - $64.21
11MPII'AL
- - - --
UI.AI.I11
- -- - - - - --
N0. RATE PER 1 000 -
-NO RATE PER 1,000
B.M. - 624;
COMBINED
kssoc. Center Inc.
F - 189.42
_
S - $54.43
-
- - -- - -- -
-
F - 162. 11
- - - - --
Deduct $250
S - $69.69
Ilue Cross /Blue
B.M. - 39C)
S - $99.77
S - $57.71
S - $101.44
AWARE - Max.
ihield
City - SSC) 48C
COMBINED
F - 215.50
F - 176.47
F - 157.33
IF - 229.63
Cost:
Deduct $100
Deducts 250
Deduct 200
S - $102.43
_
S - $64.48
S - $92.08
F --207.60
S - $115.25
F - 221.22
F - 197.15
F - 264.65
Rated Sep.
AWARE GOLD
S - $84.86
AWARE GOLD
F - 183.39
Max. Cost:
S - $104.74
S T1 18.01
F - 226.21
F - 254.82
S - $97.82
F - 211.31
S - $120.74
_
F - 260.70 (A.G.
S -
S'- .1
fireman's Fund
31C
COMBINED
F - 145.59
F - 145.41
_7
Die `uC! --$1 Q-
Te`duct- $250
(Maj. Med, only)
(Maj. Med onl
)
CARRIER
- - '—
LIFE INSURANCE -
BUM HANOR /CITY
ADW -
BURNS W1WR /CITY
GROUP HEALTH -
(3 ENTITIES)
HEALTH
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
-- HEALTH
BARNS HANOR
III'A1.T11
II(rPITAI.
SELF- Fl• "DFD 1
IU;A1,7H
Guarantee
HO. RATE PER 1,000
MO. RATE PER 1 000
•M- -
COMB I NED
Mutual Life
B.M. - 45C)
The Guardian
City - 52C)33C
COMBINED
F - 157.48
Deduct $200
(Maj. Med. only)
S - $71.52
S - $62.94
S - $101.60
LMC Ins. Trust
F - 209.16
F - 184.06
IF - 232.32
Trust Plan
rus —P an
S - $66.90 `
Trust Plan
Medcenters
S - $66.90
S - $66.90
Health Plan
F - 191.60
F - 191.60
F - 191.60
S - $70.25
S - $70.25
S - $70.25
F - 201.20
F - 201.20
F - 201.20
B.M. - 2156C
MN Mutual
23.6C
COMBINED
City - 31C
COMBINED
Physicians of
B.M. - 26C
S - $55.61
S - $68.90
S - $78.90
MN (PHP)
City - 61.6C
COMBINED
F - 157.14
F - 179.90
F - 183.29
Security Life
B.M. - 20C)
(Denver)
City - 30C) 28C
COMBINED
B.M. - 21.9C
—
Sun Life
City - 44.7C
COMBINED
31C
U.S. Life
35C
COMBINED
B.M. - 22C
City - 39C
COMBINED
9, 92- 0
IT11
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 19B6 MAY
CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MAY DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
TAXES
1625.61
350000.00
353B72.33
1322050.00
968177.67
0.27
LICENSES
54607.07
25.00
12052.32
17050.00
4997.68
0.71
PERMITS AND
FEES
8421.80
47100.20
67300.00
20199.80
0.70
INTER - GOVERNMENT
REVENUE
0.00
34786.73
1010302.00
975515.27
0.03
CHARGES FOR
SERVICES
44787.22
151117.02
491765.00
340647.98
0.31
FINES & FORFEITS
LEGAL
4688.94
12976.78
25000.00
12023.22
0.52
MISCELLANEOUS
REVENUE
14304.54
56581.92
BGB00.00
32218.08
0.64
CONTRIBUTIONS
FROM OTHER FUNDS
0.00
75000.00
465500.00
390500.00
0.16
REVENUE FOR
OTHER AGENCIES
388.00
1603.20
200.00
- 1403.20
6.02
TOTAL
426628.16
422615.50
745090.50
3487967.00
2742876.50
0.21
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
1625.61
11842.77
27549.00
15706.23
0.43
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
10040.28
54607.07
129804.00
75196.93
0.42
ELECTIONS
1669.53
1725.33
4460.00
2734.67
0.39
FINANCE
10134.77
84433.98
188032.00
103598.02
0.45
MOTOR VEHICLE
5297.63
28565.27
66884.00
3B31B.73
0.43
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
19600.00
19600.00
0.00
LEGAL
3553.66
14608.09
32654.00
18045.91
0.45
*LANNING
128.40
645.86
16475.00
15829.14
0.04
CITY HALL
3102.21
17039.27
40537.00
23497.73
0.42
RECREATION BUILDING
8329.76
234B2.81
51457.00
27974.19
0.46
POLICE DEPARTMENT
55053.09
298429.64
725058.00
426628.16
0.41
FIRE DEPARTMENT
3532.81
26703.63
82940.00
56236.37
0.32
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
3733.56
13667.55
36736.00
23068.45
0.37
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
6232.17
33520.05
77146.00
43625.95
0.43
CIVIL DEFENSE
0.00
99.70
950.00
750.30
0.12
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
FIRE MARSHALL
3065.12
18664.86
42630.00
23965.14
0.44
ENGINEERING
13219.08
72782.88
173056.00
100273.12
0.42
STREETS & ALLEYS
25511.10
124855.07
359065.00
234209.93
0.35
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
3765.56
24150.27
67150.00
42999.73
0.36
LIBRARY
470.75
31190.60
64223.00
33032.40
0.49
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
2968.44
15943.60
52191.00
36247.40
0.31
PARK /REC. ADMIN.
6108.01
33846.14
74616.00
40767.86
0.45
RECREATION
6681.53
37092.00
122100.00
8500B.00
0.30
CIVIC ARENA
6414.24
56320.23
106996.00
50675.77
0.53
PARK DEPARTMENT
27454.19
128635.89
354245.00
225409.11
0.36
CEMETERY
2904.78
13248.82
41797.00
26548.18
0.32
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2159.82
14033.92
33700.00
19666.08
0.42
DEBT SERVICE
7000.00
16900.00
62296.00
45396.00
0.27
AIRPORT
354.60
17084.24
60650.00
43565.76
0.28
TRANSIT
6173.07
30263.37
62611.00
52347.63
0.37
UNALLOCATED
9.37
88516.02
290309.00
201792.98
0.30
0 TOTAL
226693.54
1333101.13
3487967.00
2154865.87
0.39
Y
MAY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1986
MAY
79522.21
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
308.87
1275.86
4B50.00
• REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
MONTH OF
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
25164.12
MAY
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
LIQUOR SALES
34358.88
149957.39
390000.00
240042.61
0.38
WINE SALES
11213.53
46996.43
125000.00
78003.57
0.38
BEER SALES
64931.41
228113.15
635000.00
406866.85
0.36
BEER DEPOSITS
150.25
- 138.29
0.00
138.29
873550.00
MISC. SALES
3580.49
13861.65
0.00
- 13861.65
15005.00
INTEREST
415.47
1750.59
5000.00
406563.89
1189876.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
-171.06
- 918.54
0.00
918.54
TOTAL
114478.97
439622.38
1155000.00
715377.62
0.38
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
12100.30
60338.79
139861.00
79522.21
0.43
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
308.87
1275.86
4B50.00
3574.14
0.26
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
977.83
5185.88
30350.00
25164.12
0.17
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
327.00
8650.00
8323.00
0.04
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
390.30
2500.00
2109.70
0.00
DEBT SERVICE
0.00
0.00
5110.00
5110.00
0.00
TRANSFERS
0.00
0.00
110000.00
110000.00
0.00
COST OF SALES
22394.21
339046.06
873550.00
534503.94
0.39
• OTHER
0.00
0.00
15005.00
15005.00
0.00
TOTAL
35861.21
406563.89
1189876.00
783312.11
0.34
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWERIFUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WATER SALES
34819.50
181281.53
460000.00
278718.47
0.39
WATER METER SALES
410.00
1385.00
5000.00
3615.00
0.28
REFUSE SERVICES
23347.25
107625.22
245000.00
137374.78
0.44
SEWER SERVICES
42690.03
223549.04
615000.00
391450.96
0.36
EPA SALES
24120.61
127567.61
317600.00
PENALTY CHARGES
606.19
3665.01
6300.00
2634.99
0.00
INTEREST EARNED
8302.08
13987.22
80000.00
66012.78
0.17
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
132.10
2000.00
1867.90
0.00
OTHER
30.00
85.00
150.00
65.00
0.57
TOTAL
134325.66
659277.73
1731050.00
1071772.27
0.38
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
OPERATIONS
21676.15
1OB239.15
241000.00
132760.65
0.45
• WATER
13119.03
186261.08
711360.00
525098.92
0.26
SEWER
126850.93
345099.74
740015.00
394915.26
0.47
TOTAL
161646.11
639599.97
1692375.00
1052775.03
0.38
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - May 20, 1986
Large Conference Room - 5:15 PM
Present: Rev. Thor Skeie, President; Joan Ewald, Vice - President;
Rolly Balke, Secretary; Mike Carls, Trustee; Dori Johnson, Trustee;
Bob Durfee, Trustee; Dr. Carl Bretzke, Chief of Medical Staff.
Others Present: Philip Graves, Administrator; Willard Rosenow, Assistant
Administrator; Jane Hodgins, Hutchinson Leader; Virginia Penk,
KDUZ /KKJR Radio; Sherrie Krueger, Recording Secretary;
Bernie Hesse, McGladrey Hendrickson & Pullen
At 5:45 PM, following dinner, Graves introduced Mr. Bernie Hesse of
McGladrey Hendrickson and Pullen. Hesse presented the results of the
financial audit which his firm completed for the hospital covering
the fiscal year which ended 12/31/85. Hesse reviewed, via overhead,
several of the financial statements from his audit report, which had
been distributed to board members prior to the meeting. He brought to
the board's attention several very favorable financial statistics found
in these reports. He noted that the hospital has a current ratio of
current assets to liabilities of over 3 to 1; he felt this was an
excellent ratio, with a good ratio being 2 to 1. He also noted that
this figure has steadily increased from 1982. Another encouraging
statistic is that the current number of days in Accounts Receivable
is 62 days, whereas the average is about 75, again indicating that we're
doing better in this area than most of our peers. Hesse further stated
that net operating income should be between b and 10 %, whereas ours was
2.4% for 1985.
Hesse also reviewed for the board members several of his predictions
for the next 4 years in the healthcare industry. Among his predictions
were: Medicare will continue on the DRG system; inpatient admissions
will increase (possibly patients will demand access to hospitals and
this may become a political situation); approximately 400 hospitals will
close by 1990; hospital mergers will increase; we will see an increased
number of surgi- centers; there will be an oversupply of physicians
(this may force many physicians to practice in outstate areas where
they are reluctant to go now); Blue Cross and other insurance companies
will purchase hospitals; hospitals will continue to be more specialized;
and finally, hospitals will expand their non -acute services such as
long -term care, home health care and hospice care.
The management letter was also presented by Hesse. Some areas
regarding office control procedures were highlighted.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Balke, seconded by Carls, to accept the audit
as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried.
The board thanked Mr. Hesse for his presentation.
Page 2
Regular Board of Directors Meeting
May 20, 1986
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Johnson, seconded by Carls, to instruct the
board secretary to send a letter of commendation to the
administrative staff on their fine job of management as
indicated by the financial audit. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Graves indicated to the board secretary that he would consider the letter
sent and thanked the trustees for their support.
Minutes of Past Meetings. The minutes of the April, 1986, regular
meeting of the board of directors were presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Balke, to approve the
minutes of the April 14th, 1986, regular board of directors
meeting as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes. Bretzke presented the minutes of the
May medical staff meetings. He noted that the Medical Staff had
contributed $200 to the Physicians Serving Physicians organization and
$250 to the Dollars for Scholars Fund. No other comments were made.
New Business.
A. Audit Presentation. The report was given by Mr. Hesse -at the onset of
the meeting.
B. Air Conditioning Unit for New Data Processing System. Graves indicated
that the new air conditioning system for the data processing area would
need to be installed within the next 2 weeks. He also indicated that
this would need to be a ceiling - installed system in order to conserve
space. The hospital had received bids from Schlueter Refrigeration for
$5,298 and from Allied Mechanical Systems for $5,900 for ceiling- mounted
systems. Graves indicated that the Schlueter bid was the lowest bid
$5,298, but there was some question whether Schlueter could provide the
unit within the necessary two weeks. Allied Mechanical had indicated
they would be able to meet the two -week deadline. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Balke, seconded by Johnson, to give the
Administrator authority to purchase the air conditioning unit
from Schlueter Refrigeration if they could provide it on time,
and if not, to purchase from Allied Mechanical Systems.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
I*
0
Page 3
Regular Board of Directors Meeting
May 20, 1986
New Business (Continued)
C. Ford Place. Graves informed the board that the Open House at Ford
Place which had been set for Sunday, June lst, had been cancelled
due to high school graduation ceremonies on that day. He will inform
the board when a new date is set.
The board requested that they be informed on monthly operations of `
Ford Place. It was noted that information such as number of patients
could be found in the Mental Health Unit Director's Report.
At the request of the board, Graves will compile a profit and loss
financial statement for the board each month.
Statistical Report. The statistical report was presented. There were
168 admissions for the month of April, 118 surgical cases, 50% of which
were one -day surgeries. May will also be a high volume month for surgery.
Graves indicated that the number of newborns was down in April, but the
general feeling about BirthCare if very good. Graves informed the board
that Dr. Wolff from Cokato had requested and been granted temporary
privileges. He had recently admitted 2 patients.
Accounts Payable. The accounts payable for the month of April were
presented. Following discussion: -
Motion was made by Balke, seconded by Durfee, to approve for payment
the attached listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements in
the amount of $442,016.75. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Financial Statements. Graves reported a gain of $68,000, with excess
revenue over expenses of $44,000. He also noted that the Mental Health
Unit has been doing extremely well, due in part to some new programs
and that the therapists are very busy.
Departmental Resort.
A. Director of Mental Health Unit. The report was presented. No unusual
comments were made.
B. Education Coordinator. The report was presented. No unusual comments
were made.
C. Dietitian. The report was presented. No unusual comments were made.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes. The minutes were presented. No unusual comments
were made.
C3)'
Page 4
Regular Board of Directors Meeting
May 20, 1986
Other.
Graves informed the board of directors that Bill Rosenow, Assistant
Administrator, will resign as of 6/30/86. Graves noted the fine job
Rosenow has done and said that he will be sadly missed because of his
significant contributions to the hospital. Graves also said the Asst
Position would not be replaced immediately and that an attempt would
be made as much as possible to absorb his duties. also indicated He
that both the employees and the board would be planning celebrations
in honor of Rosenow, and that he would keep the board informed of such
plans.
Adjournment.
There being no further business,
Motion was made by Balke, seconded by Bretzke, to call for
adjournment of the meeting. All were in favor. Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned by Vice- President Ewald at 8:00 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
c�
Sherrie Krueger
Recording Secretary Rolly Balke
Secretary
SK
0
Admix
0
0
0
CURRL4T PERIOD
HUMIMSON CCP4NNITY HOSPITAL
BUDGET o0MPARISONS - NATURAL CATMORI1
FOR FIVE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1986
AC11YJ -s "7X,i71 YiOdNNCi PATIENT RIVIML
Daily Hospital Service
$143,864 $151,249 $ (7,385) Medical Nursing Units
31,810 52,971 (21,161) Mental Health Unit
349,710 338,116 11,594 Ancillary
$525,384 $542,336 $(16,952) Gross Patient Revenue
(29,284) (12,873) (16,411) Less: Discounts & Allowances
$496,100 $529,463 $(33,363) Net Patient Revenue
20,085 15,974 4,111 Other Operating Revenue
$516,185 $545,437 $(29,252) Total Operating Revue
$255,492
$258,174
$ (2,682)
Salaries
47,511
48,128
(617)
Employee Benefits
0,172
33,131
(10,959)
Medical & Other Fees
,441
11,180
(1,739)
Raw Food
'13) 529
9,610
3,919
Drugs
55,790
40,677
15,113
Medical & Other Supplies
10,479
16,705
(6,226)
Utilities
10,141
6,988
3,153
Building & Bguipment Repairs
4,209
3,294
915
Rental Expense
5,220
5,418
(198)
Insurance
2,793
2,949
(156)
Interest
18,566
23,435
(4,869)
Depreciation
5,746
13,106
(7,360)
Other Expanses
$461,089 $472,795 $(11,706) Total Operating Expense
55,096 72,642 (17,54() Operating Insane
YEAR -TO -DATE
ACTUAL BUDGET VAP.Ii-_7CL
$699,957 $789,329 $(89,372)
193,596 217,017.` (23,421)
1,593,504 1,603,536 (10,032)
$2,487,057 $2,609,882. $(122,825)
(127,552) (66,704) (60,848)
$2,359,505 $2,543,178 $(183,673)
_ 93,220 79,011 14,209
$2,452,725 $2,622,189-
$1,228,248 $1,271,987 $(43,739)
225,921
236,525
(10,604)
121,123
129,525
(8,402)
42,934
49,380
(6,446)
66,478
48,674
17,804
251,215
228,646
22,569
72,974
86,,930
(13,956)
30,631
36,762
(6,131)
17,194
14,071
3,123
26,100
27,090
(990)
14,641
14,745
(104)
97,193
117,175
(19,982)
36,895
58,888
(21,993)
$2,231,547 $2,320,398 $(88,851)
Add (Deduct)
Non - Operating Revenue (Expense)
Price - Level. Depreciation
(23,721) (23,721) - -- And working Capital
221,178 301,791_ (80,613)
(118,605) (118,605) - --
$ 31,375 $ 48,921 $(17,546) Excess Revenues over Expenses $102,573 $183,186 $(80,613)
4
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 20, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice - Chairman Shu -Mei Hwang at 7:30
p.m., with the following members present: Spencer Beytien, Thomas Lyke,
Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young and Vice- Chairman Hwang. Members absent:
Roland Ebent and Larry Romo. Also present: City Administrator Gary
Plotz, Director of Engineering Marlow Priebe and City Attorney James
Schaefer.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Beytien made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated April 15, 1986. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(A) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY GERALD
BLOCK
Vice- Chairman Hwang opened the public hearing with the reading of
publication #3549 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, May 8, 1986. The request is for a con itional use permit
to allow the operation of a convenience store /gas station and car
wash in a C -4 zone.
Mr. Block was present to explain the request. He presented a
drawing showing the parking plan for the site. Discussion
followed. It was determined that 12 spaces are necessary for the
car wash and 8 for the convenience store /apt. units. Director
Priebe noted that the plan must show traffic flow and that the cars
must be able to maneuver easily. Mr. Block was directed to rework
the plan for traffic flow and parking before consideration by the
City Council.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing
at 7:49 p.m. Seconded by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried
unanimously. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the conditional use permit, with the
stipulation that the applicant reorganize traffic patterns for the
car wash so it is acceptable to staff. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the
motion carried unanimously.
(B) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY DAVID MCGRAW
Vice - Chairman Hwang opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3551, as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, May 8, 1986. The request is for a 3' variance to
allow the construction of a single family residence 3' from the
sideyard property line.
1
-Q ('3)
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
Mrs. Carl Nelson, future owner of neighboring property was present
to state her objection to the request. Vice- Chairman Hwang read a
letter from Mr. and Mrs. Nelson stating their objection to the
request. Mrs. Nelson later asked about fire equipment being able
to get between the two homes (proposed and existing house to the
east).
Mr. Ron McGraw, representing applicant David McGraw, was present to
state that the home previously on the property was destroyed by
fire and although the proposed building requires a variance, it is
an improvement (over previous and existing situations). He also
stated that it is a square- shaped lot which doesn't allow much for
construction of one -story homes; the proposal meets all other
requirements; and there is an existing driveway and curb cut off
Fifth Avenue that would be used for the proposed house. He further
explained that the proposed house is not for the present owner but
for a propective owner of the property.
Mr. Mike Schmidt, 512 Lynn Road, asked what the hardship was stated
his objection to the request. Mr. McGraw stated that the hardship
was that they would not have a buyer for the property. There was
discussion of an existing garage on the property. It was deter-
mined that the existing garage would not remain on the property.
(A conditional use permit to move the garage to another site was
approved April 22, 1986.)
Mr. Dallas Hansen, person interested in purchasing lot and building .
proposed house, stated his concern was that he would like to use
existing driveway, and with the six foot setback, there would be
too much swing to get into the garage. He stated that it would
also involve moving a large tree.
Dr. Lyke asked if there had been any consideration of an L- shaped
house. Mr. Torgerson read conditions for granting a variance from
the ordinance. He stated that although changing a curb cut could
be an economic consideration, the ordinance prohibits using
economics as the only basis for granting a variance. Administrator
Plotz explained that the staff recommended the request be denied
based on the fact that the property could be put to a reasonable
use without the variance, by using a different layout.
After discussion, Dr. Lyke made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried and the hearing was
closed at at 8:05 p.m. Dr. Lyke made a motion to recommend that
the request for a variance be denied. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Beytien. Motion carried unanimously. Discussion followed. Dr.
Lyke amended his motion to include "based on the fact that we
didn't feel the test of reasonable use was met and that the
property could be put to another use." The motion to amend was
seconded by Mr. Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(C) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY JON OTTESON
Vice - Chairman Hwang opened the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. with the
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
reading of publication #3552 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, May 8, 1986. The request is for a co_n_dTM'o_n_a7 use
• permit to allow the construction of a 14' by 20' addition to an
existing, nonconforming garage located at 558 Hassan St. S.
Mr. Otteson was present to explain that the request is for an
addition that will allow him to park a full size car in the
existing garage and add a workshop /storage area. He stated that
the entire structure will be resided and a new roof will be put
on it. Other options would require him to remove a large oak tree
and would cause a safety problem with backing into the alley
blindly (neighboring garage would block view).
City Administrator Plotz explained that this request also requires
a variance. Staff recommended approval based on the fact that
other options are not reasonable. A 6' setback would require the
person to back into the alley blindly. As it is planned, they are
coming in at an angle.
Mrs. Young noted that he is not building a whole new structure,
but adding to an existing structure. Director Priebe explained
that the because the structure was built in accordance with the
ordinance in effect at the time, the conditional use permit is
allowed. Administrator Plotz added that because it is an existing
structure, it should not be automatic.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing.
. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as
the existing garage was nonconforming when it was built. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(D) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY JON OTTESON
Chairman Hwang opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3553 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, May 8, 1986. The request is for a 5.3'
variance and a 3.7' sideyard variance to allow the construction of
a 14' by 20' addition to an existing, nonconforming garage.
Dr. Lyke questioned the reasons given to show hardship, noting
trouble reconciling siting an oak tree as a hardship. He
questioned whether or not a variance is necessary. He further
stated that as the ordinance provides for a conditional use permit
to expand an existing, nonconforming structure that was built in
compliance with the 1962 ordinance, the present setback require-
ments don't apply.
Director Priebe responded that if in the request to expand, the
expansion can be done without violating present setback require -
ments, a variance is not required. He stated that the conditional
use permit allows the expansion. The expansion is then reviewed to
see if it meets present setback requirements. If not, a variance
is required.
3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
Dr. Lyke made a motion to table consideration of the request until
the City Administrator can find out if the request can be granted
with just a conditional use permit. The motion died for lack of a
second.
City Attorney Schaefer explained that there is a difference in
talking about a hardship for an existing building rather than a
building for a vacant lot, as what you can do with an existing
building is much more limited.
After discussion, Mrs. Young made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously. Mr.
Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the variance as
the existing garage is nonconforming, the owner did not create the
hardship and other alternatives are not reasonable because of the
safety factor. Seconded by Beytien, the motion carried, with Dr.
Lyke voting nay.
(E) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT AS SUBMITTED BY HARLOW STILLINGS
Vice - Chairman Hwang opened the hearing at 8:37 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3554 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, May 8, 1986. The request is for consideration of a
preliminary plat to be known as STILLINGS -HOEFT ADDITION, which is
located on the south end of Graham Street and west end of Milwaukee
Avenue.
Mr. Stillings was present to explain the request. Driector Priebe •
stated that he had not met with Mr. Stillings regarding
improvements. He told Mr. Stillings that he has the option of
hiring a private engineer and contractor to do the improvements or
the City will be able to look at doing them in 1987. He stated
that the City could not do them before that time. Director Priebe
submitted a certification that the Preliminary Plat as submitted
meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, as per
Preliminary Plat Data. He noted that prior to the final plat, a
subdivision agreement must be executed and parks and playground
contribution must be paid.
Dr. Lyke expressed concern from the Utilities Commission regarding
platting such a small piece of property. He asked if there was a
larger, overall plan for the area. Director Priebe responded that
there is a plan of which the Utilities Commission could be given a
copy. Dr. Lyke stated there was no objection from the Utilities
Commission.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the
hearing. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and
the hearing was closed at 8:39 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat, as it
has met all the requirements. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion
carried unanimously.
U
0
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
(F) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE 1464, SECTIONS 6.03,
6.05, and 6.08
• Vice- Chairman Hwang opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. Dr.
Lyke made a motion to waive reading of the publication notice
#3555. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously.
City Administrator Plotz explained that the amendment is a result
of a follow up of what is now State law. City Attorney Schaefer
explained that the amendment will make it more difficult to justify
the granting of a variance, and noted that the language was pulled
directly from State Statute.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried unanimously. Mr. Torger-
son made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the
amendment as proposed. Seconded by Dr. Lyke, the motion carried
unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(A) REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Director Priebe explained that he had attended the Park Board
meeting on May 7, where the Park Board reviewed the plan regarding
future park land. He further reported that they have no
• recommendations for change at this time, but will review the map
again and make recommendations each year before the Planning
Commission reviews the plan.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan. Seconded by Dr. Lyke,
the motion carried unanimously.
5. NEW BUSINESS
(A) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF HELLAND'S SEVENTH ADDITION
Director Priebe submitted certification that the final plat meets
all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per "Final
Plat Procedure ". He noted that there were no changes from the
preliminary plat as previously approved by the commission and
counicl. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council
approval of the final plat, as it has been certified by the
Director of Engineering. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried
unanimously.
(B) CONOSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GERALD GASSMAN TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Gassman was present to explain that he is platting
• approximately 7 acres into 3 sections. The name of the plat is
TARADIDDLE ACRES. He also presented a map of how the property
would be subdivided if it ever came into the City.
2
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
Director Priebe stated that there should be a subdivision agreement
drawn up prior to the approval of the final plat, which will
address how improvements will be handled and parks and playground .
contribution in the event of the property comes into the City.
Mr. Hwang read letter of approval from Acoma Township.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council approval
of the preliminary plat, subject to subdivision agreement being
drawn up prior to approval of the final plat. Seconded by Dr.
Lyke, the motion carried unanimously.
(C) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GEORGE HERBERT TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS)
Mr. George Herbert was present to answer any questions about the
request. Letters from the Hutchinson Town Board approving the plat
and MnDot stating that only one entrance will be allow to David
Lee Acres and that access will have to be off Herbert Drive were
presented. Director Priebe asked who would be responsible for
moving the access. Mr. Herbert responded that he would. Director
Preibe stated that he would like reference to that and a reasonable
time frame for moving the access in the subdivision agreement to be
drawn up before approval of the final plat. Mr. Herbert also
explained that the County would like the proposed street names
changed.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City .
Council approval of the preliminary plat upon completion of a
subdivision agreement. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried
unanimously.
(D) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF TARADIDDLE ACRES AS SUBMITTED TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS) (Agricultural to Rural Residential)
After discussion, Or. Lyke made a motion to state that the Planning
Commission has no objection to the rezoning as submitted. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(E) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF NORTHVIEW ACRES AS SUBMITTED TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS) (Agricultural to Rural Residential)
After discussion, Dr. Lyke made a motion to state that the Planning
Commission has no objection to the rezoning as submitted. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(F) PRESENTATION BY SUPERINDENT OF SCHOOL DISTRICT #423 GLENN MATEJKA
Superintendent Matejka presented the site plan for the proposed
education building. He explaned site, parking plans and expansion
plans as shown on the drawing.
•
rl
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 20, 1986
6. ADJOURNMENT
. There being no further business, Mr. Beytien made a motion to
adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried
unanimously and the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
•
NOTE: THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE ON
MONDAY, JUNE 16 AT 8:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL.
7
•
•
IE
HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
National Convention
DATE 6 -18 -86
I request permission to attend the Annual IACP Conference in Nashville,
Tennessee October 4 through 9, 1986. I have not attended a national or state
chiefs meeting in several years and feel that much is to be learned by doing
SO.
My wife will accompany me on this trip and I plan to drive a city vehicle
to save money.
Advance registration and housing requests are attached.
DMO:neb
5 "f
U11E-
�r. Dousing Request
rorrcr
u
° IACP 93RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE
Nashville, Tennessee, USA OCTOBER 4-9, 1986
Please read carefully
• Please print or type all items to assure accuracy.
• Complete each part below in detail for correct and
rapid computer processing.
• Should more than two (2) rooms be needed, form
may be duplicated, or supplemental room list must
be attached using same format as In Part 3.
• All confirmations will be sent to individual indicated
In Part 1.
abbreviations Part 1: Complete requested data using
..:. m■�nnMRMRMr••■MMER■■■■■■■■■■■
miiii ■�iii`�i■■n�®i cWj■m
Part 2: Select THREE Hotel /Motels of your choice. No request will be processed without THREE choices.
First Choice OPRYt_Q ND
Second Choice RAMaeq ll.T OP" /AWO
Third Choice F Ipc)t R z'NN No rj-%A
Part 3: 1. Print or type names of all persons occupying each room.
2. Select type room desired with arrival and departure dates. .
3. Supplemental list for additional mom must use same format.
4. Print or type last name first.
.,_�'7.'tLSI
E Single
IACP Advance Approval Required ... call (301) 948,0922
NOTE: Reservations will be held only until 6 P.M. After room
reservation is confirmed by a hotel, any changes, cancella-
tions and deposit refunds must be handled directly by that
hotel. Refunds of deposits are not required for cancellations
made later than 48 hours prior to the date of arrival
Opryland hotel requires 72 hours notice.
FOR HOUSING BUREAU USE ONLY
Please forward $70.00 per room deposit
payable to:
NASHVILLE HOUSING BUREAU
Mail this form and deposit to:
Nashville Area Chamber of Commerc�
161 Fourth Avenue North
Nashville, TN USA 37219
6—al l
-_ -- 1
E Double /Double
Arr. Date
Dep Date
A r. Time
E A.M.
❑ P.M.
Room k2
E Single
E Double
E Double /Double
An. Date
Dep Date
Arr. Time
❑ A.M.
E P.M.
Room 113
= 1 Bedroom
' Suites
E 2 Bedroom
Only
Am. Date
Dep Date
Am. Time
E A.M.
❑ P.M.
IACP Advance Approval Required ... call (301) 948,0922
NOTE: Reservations will be held only until 6 P.M. After room
reservation is confirmed by a hotel, any changes, cancella-
tions and deposit refunds must be handled directly by that
hotel. Refunds of deposits are not required for cancellations
made later than 48 hours prior to the date of arrival
Opryland hotel requires 72 hours notice.
FOR HOUSING BUREAU USE ONLY
Please forward $70.00 per room deposit
payable to:
NASHVILLE HOUSING BUREAU
Mail this form and deposit to:
Nashville Area Chamber of Commerc�
161 Fourth Avenue North
Nashville, TN USA 37219
6—al l
ftf••
Advance Registration
Fbrm rOUCF
1ACP 93RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE
,�•� rAer AA'O' OCTOBER 4-9, 1986 Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Please type or print —only one member per form. List all names exactly as badges should be prepared.
Exhibitors —do not use these forms
IACP Member only. Check one XActive /Life ❑ Associate ❑ Sustaining
For registration purposes, list your current business afTilfatlon and business address REG. FEE
Name A ]_Q N M. Q t
0100.00
title G f
Agency U�
Address al WAS4llPJ6rTD?'-A AVE W.
City/State/Zip T&_ -A t N
Name
If registration receipt should be sent to other than the about location, Indicate address below:
Address
Title
City/State /Zip
Agency
Spouse ANL 01 o p, SK
$ 50.00
Non- Member Guests: $150.00 each, Spouse $60.00, Children under 16 $25.00
Form must be signed by IACP member registered for 1986 Conference in Nashville*
Name
$
Title
Agency
Address
City/State /Zip
Name
$
Title
Agency
Address
City/State /Zip
If any portion of advance registration is cancelled, there will be a 10% Total Amount Enclosed $
charge if cancellation received 30 days prior to opening of conference: (U.S. Currency) 1 C.^D. O ?�
otherwise there will be a 20% charge. l ,/ l/
Flease charge to my account: ❑ Visa ❑ Mastercard G Choice
Credit Card Number Exp Date
Make remittances payable to "IACP.' FLIT payment required —NO CASH. Attach separate sheet if more space is required for additional
non -member guests
Complete and return will full payment before September 6, Mail to:
1986. Forms postmarked after that date cannot be processed IACP CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
and will be returned. Thirteen Firstfield Road, F.O. Box 6010
Note: If unable to meet this deadline, you may register onsite Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 20878
beginning at 9:00 a.m. Saturday, October 4. 1986.
'Signature of IACP Member Membership X Daytime Phone
IACP USE ONLY
CR ptrs Agy Other l
N
0
0
Gad
-
f
`�+� -mil ✓�. ' x/,,01. ��ts -�+/L O�.n.C`'l.`tt..� ,
c
PETITION
For a sign at Echo Circle to alert drivers of children at play. 0
0
d-da.
&7 /
WA ORMAt M-22 j
MWIN MAIVI��
81 MI
24 IMIN
WANTUM
/A�i
ANNE R 11-
WN
A��f� f
0
d-da.
&7 /
0 HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE 6 -18 -86
TO Mayor and City Council
FROM Dean M. O'Borsky, Chief of Police
SUBJECT Petiton
The persons on Echo Circle have obviously identified a problem which concerns
them enough to contact City Hall. I recommend the Council follow their wishes and
erect "Caution- Children" signs as approved by the Street Superintendent.
i
0 DMO:neb
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON •
37 A'A.SH!°iuTC'" ENU_ ,VEST
HUTC•Hi,1SON ✓'Ld ^. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: -- June-16,-1986
--—- - - -- ---
TO: — — Mayor and City Council _
FROM: _ Ralph _ Neumann ___________
r T
SUBJECT: Caution Signs for Echo Circle
if it is the Council's wishes we will install the necessary
warning signs on Echo Circle. .
For your information we will be installing caution signs at
the Roberts Park area before the Water Carnival week -end.
Also, fresh yellow painted lines have been applied.
•
�J
RESOLUTION NO. 8302
TRANSFERRING $8,852 FROM PUBLIC SITES TRUST FUND
TO RECREATION & POOL CONSTRUCTION FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT $8,852 is hereby transferred by the Public Sites Trust
Fund to Recreation & Pool Construction Fund.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June 1986
aul l�. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. P otz
City Clerk
0
7 � 1
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
N '5
JUNE 5, 1986
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS NUMBER 8302, 8303, AND 8304
Several resolutions for your action are on the agenda. We
have sold our 1986 bonds for special assessment bonds.
Resolution 8304 sets the interest rate at the net rate at which
the bonds were sold. This year the net interest rate was 6.2%
The council may want to consider a floor for the interest rate on
special assessment bonds. Before the interest rate went wild the
city policy set a rate of 7% no matter what the bonds interest.
By doing this the potential problem of property owners wanting to
wait for better interest rates may be averted. 7 percent would
be an good rate and since this will be the first time the rate
would be lower than 7% - action to set a new rate would be
appropriate.
Resolution 8303 is the authorizing transfer of engineering and
administration costs from the 1986 improvement to the general
fund. The $162,207 is based upon actual construction cost bids
awarded. Per resolution number 7920 adopted in 1984 the $162,207
is 14 % of construction costs.
Finally resolution 8302 is authorizing transfer of funds from the
Jorgenson park land sale to the pool and recreation construction
fund which had been previously agreed to by the council.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8307
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT
AND SERVICES BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the past
and can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger by fire, hazard,
casualty or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring outside the
territorial limits of the City of Hutchinson; and by the suddenness thereof it
would be impossible or impractical for the City Council to meet and authorize
the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to combat such fire, haz-
ard, casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL as follows:
The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City Admin-
istrator or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and
in each case the internal needs of the City of Hutchinson and its inhabitants,
to dispatch City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to combat.such
occurrence whether it takes place within or without the City limits.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the City
Administrator or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City
• of Hutchinson and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equip-
ment, liability insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance and all
other safeguards and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment and personnel,
shall apply in each case as if specifically authorized and directed by this
City Council at such time, whether or not the governing body or authority of
the place in which the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence
exists, has previously requested and provided for assistance and the use of
the Hutchinson equipment and personnel under a mutual protection agreement or
other type protection agreement with the City of Hutchinson.
FURTHER, the City Administrator or his designee shall recall, order and
terminate the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their use
no longer exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the best
interest of the City of Hutchinson.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for Administration:
City Administrator
r
Approved as to form and legality:
City Attorney
r/ _ 17
HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO
FR
DATE June 19, 1986
SUBJECT Mutual Aid Agreement
The County Civil Defense Director has requested that we expand our mutual
aid committment. I have examined the attached request and have provided a
resolution for approval.
I think this is an excellent idea which is being widely used and is
particularly important when a community is struck by a catastrophe which is
beyond their ability to cope.
iIIi71 W
J
0
•Michael S. Monge
County Director
June 6, 1986
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
McLeod County Law Enforcement Center
80I East Ioth Street
Glencoe, Minnesota 55336
Chief Dean O'Borsky
Hutchinson Police Departemtn
Hutchinson, MN. 55350
Dear Dean:
Business Phone: (6I2) 864 -3I34
Home Phone: (6I2) 587 -8I98
Enclosed is a copy of a mutual aid agreement that McLeod County has
signed into resolution and I would like to see each city in McLeod County
authorize this same agreement. The idea originated in the metro area
and has been authorized by over 30 cities and 4 counties and it authorizes
the usage of everything from dump trucks to assessors if your area should
ever have a major incident. If all cities within McLeod County would
sign this same agreement, we could call upon each other during a disaster
and we would have the availability of any and all equipment and manpower
necessary.
I have contacted all counties bordering McLeod County and suggested
that they consider this same proposal which would then give us equipment
and manpower from all counties surrounding ours.
Thank you for your consideration and please contact me if you need any
assistance with this proposal. I am also enclosing a copy of all current
participants in this program for you to share with your city council.
Sincerely,
W wic .
Mike Monge
McLeod County
MM /ed
enc.
McLeod County An Equal Opportunity Employer
April 2, 1966
Following is a list of jurisdictions that have adopted
resolutions permitting emergency use of their equipment and
personnel in emergency situations:
City of Anoka
City of Blaine
City of Bloomington
City of Brooklyn Center
City of Brooklyn Park
City of Carver
City of Champlin
City of Chanhassen
City of Chaska
City of Cologne
City of Coon Rapids
City of Corcoran
City of Edina
City of Excelsior
City of Falcon Heights
city of Fridley
City of Golden Valley
City of Greenfield
City of Hamburg
Hennepin County
City of Hopkins
City of Maple Grove
City of New Brighton
City of New Hope
City of North St. Paul
City of Plymouth
City of Prior Lake
City of Robbinsdale
City of St. Anthony
City of St. Louis Park
Scott County
City of Shorview
City of Shorewood
South Lake Minnetonka
City of Tonka Bay
City of Vadnais Heights
City of Victoria
City of Waconia
City of Watertown
City of Young America
�aau� �ow,cnr
lY1 LMDD &OUrtT%�
E
RESOLUTION NO. 8306
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Polymer
2,845.80
Sludge Chemical
Sewer
Yes
Nalco Chemical Co.
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDCET VENDOR
Date Approved: _June 24, 1986
Smotion made by:
Seconded by:
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT
. ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 205
Resolution No. 8312
WHEREAS, pursuant to action taken by the City Council at its Regular
Meeting on June 10th, 1986, the following portion of Assessment Roll No. 205
is hereby rejected:
Ninth Avenue between Elm Street and Highway 15
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
City Clerk
CJ
J
Mayor
7— d
RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT
. PROJECT NO. 85 -01 -24
Resolution No. 8313
WHEREAS, pursuant to action taken by the City Council at its Regular
Meeting on June 10th, 1986, the following portion of Project No. 85 -01 -24 is
hereby rejected:
Ninth Avenue between Elm Street and Highway 15
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
City Clerk
u
Mayor
0
E
r 1
U
RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 217
Resolution No. 8314
WHEREAS, a Resolution of the City Council adopted the 27th day of May,
1986, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the proposed improvement of Ninth
Avenue from T.H. 15 to Elm Street by the construction of Storm Sewer and
Appurtenances,
AND WHEREAS, two weeks published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon
on the 10th day of June, 1986, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the City Council hereby determines not to undertake the
improvement proposed in the Council Resolution adopted May 27th, 1986.
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
City Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT
• PROJECT NO. 86 -07
Resolution No. 8315
WHEREAS, pursuant to a Resolution passed by the Council on April 22nd,
1986, Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the improvement of Ninth Avenue from
T.H. 15 to Elm Street by the construction of Storm Sewer and Appurtenances,
said bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Juul Contracting Company, Hutchinson, MN $16,583.25
WHEREAS, it appears that Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder,
WHEREAS, a Petition objecting to said improvement was presented to the
Council at the Assessment Hearing on June 10th, 1986, by the owners of
property on Ninth Avenue,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. That the City Council hereby determines not to undertake the
improvement proposed in the Council Resolution adopted April 22nd, 1986.
Adopted by the Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
City Clerk
11
Mayor
0
0
is
RESOLUTION NO. 8316
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SECURITIES TO
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, First National Bank of Hutchinson, a duly designated depository
of the City, has requested the release of the following securities:
PLEDGE
DESCRIPTION
MATURITY
AMOUNT
6475
U.S. Treasury Notes H86
06 -30 -86
$200,000.00
which have heretofore been pledged as collateral security for the account of
the City with such depository.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Treasurer is hereby authorized to release and return to
said depository the securities requested by the First National Bank of Hutch-
inson, Minnesota.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
i �
0
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 12/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6.03 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED
"THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS"
THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 6.03 of the Zoning Ordinances of
the City
of Hutchinson entitled "THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS"
is hereby
amended as follows:
6.03 THE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
A.
There is hereby established a Zoning Board of Appeals
for the City of Hutchinson, which shall consist of
all the members of the Planning Commission.
B.
Powers and Duties of the.Board: The Board shall have
the power and duty of hearing and deciding, subject
to appeal to the City Council as herein provided,
appeal or requests in the following cases:
(a) Appeals where it is alleged that there is an
error in any order, requirement, decision or
determination made by an administrative officer
in the enforcement of this Ordinance.
(b) Requests for variances from the literal
provisions of this Ordinance in: instances where
their strict enforcement would cause undue
hardship because of circumstances unique to the
individual property under consideration* and
where such action will be in keeping with the
spirit and intent of this ordinance.
In granting a variance, the Board, and the City
Council on appeal, may impose conditions to insure
compliance and to protect adjacent properties.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage
and publication. -
ADOPTED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THIS
24th DAY OF .June , 1986.
.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ATTEST:
By/
Paul Ackland, Mayor
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
• PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 15/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6.05 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY HUTCHINSON ENTITLED "VARIANCES"
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 6.05 of the Zoning Ordinances of
the City of Hutchinson is hereby amended as follows:
C. Conditions for Variance
1. A variance shall be permitted only if it is
established that it is in harmony with the general
purpose spirit and intent of this Ordinance and that
there - are - preetieel -dips iYr- the -any - o•-- eareying
eut-- the-- at -ritt - �ettet-- ef-- bhe-- p•twrisroste - -of- -this
Gedinenee: strict enforcement of the rovisi0na of
this Ordinance would cause undue hardship because of
circumstances unique to the individual property under
consideration. In its consideration of the standards
. of praetieel - -- di * iietrl -iea- -err --- partierrl -ar undue
hardship, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall require
evidence that:
(a) The property in question cannot
rea eon able --retivr! if- -- te- 4>e- �rsec} -enly
under - tire- l lowed - ADy- -the - regulations
governing- the- distriet- in- whieh- it- ie- leeeted -be
put to a reasonable use if used under conditions
allowed by this Ordinance;
(b) The plight of the owner is due to unique
eireu�nstertee---- rmt ---- epplieeble--- tw---- edjeeent
lendheldings = --- within ---- ti+e--- -_ane--- distriet-
circumstances unique to the property and not
created by the landowner; and
(c) The variance, if granted, will not alter the
essential character of the locality.
(d) Economic considerations alone do not constitute
the alleged undue hardship if reasonable use for
Ordinance.
(e) The availability and access to direct sunlight
for solar energy systems. Inadequate access to
direct sunlight where solar energy systems are
utilized may be considered an undue hardship.
0 0
2. A variance shall be granted only if the evidence, in
the judgment of the Zoning Board of Appeals, sustains
each of the three conditions enumerated in
subparagraph 1 hereof.
3. Variance from
be recommended
granted by the
the provisions
may be granted
in no others:
:he provisions of this Ordinance shall
by the Zoning Board of Appeals and
City Council only in accordance with
of subparagraphs 1 and 2 hereof, and
only in the following instances, and
(a) To vary the applicable lot area, lot width, and
lot depth requirements; provided, however, that
the minimum lot area per dwelling unit
requirements for multiple family dwellings shall
not be varied so as to permit more than one
dwelling unit in addition to the number that
would be permitted by strict application of the
minimum lot area requirements.
(b) To vary the applicable bulk regulations,
including maximum height, lot coverage and floor
area ratio, and minimum yard requirements.
(c) To vary the applicable off - street parking and •
off- street loading requirements.
(d) To vary the regulations relating to restoration
of damages or destroyed non - conforming
structures.
(e) To vary regulations relating to signs.
(f) For earth sheltered construction as defined by
MS 116J.061 Subdivision 21 where such
construction is in harmony with this ordinance.
(q) For the temporary use of a one family dwelling
4. Specific conditions and safeguards may be imposed
upon the premises benefited by a variance as
considered necessary to prevent injurious effects
upon other proprty in the neighborhood or upon public
facilities and services. Violation of such
conditions and safeguards shall be a violation of
this Ordinance.
5. No variance permitting the erection or alteration of
a building shall be valid for a period longer than
six months unless a building permit for such erection
or alteration is issued and construction is actually
begun within that period and is thereafter eiligently
pursued to completion.
IL
6. Within the Floodway and Flood Fringe Districts, no
variance may permit a lower degree of protection than
the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation for that
particular area.
7. Prior to granting a Use Permit or processing an
application for a Conditional Use Permit or Variance,
the Zoning Administrator shall determine that the
applicant has obtained all necessary State and
Federal Permits.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THIS
24th DAY OF June , 1986.
ATTEST:
0
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
Paul Ackland, Mayor
f
i
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 16/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 6.08 OF THE ZONING
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED
"PUBLIC HEARINGS"
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 6.08 B of the Zoning Ordinances of
the City of Hutchinson entitled "Public Hearings" is hereby
amended as follows:
B. Notice of Hearings. Notice of public hearings
shall be given not more than 30 days and not less
than 10 days before the hearing by publication at
least once in one or more newspapers of general
circulation in the City of Hutchinson. Such
notice shall include the time and place of the
hearing, a description of the contents of the
request to be heard, and the address or location
of the property to which the request applies.
In addition to the general notice to the public,
separate notice by letter shall be required for
all property owners residing within the area, and
for a distance of 596 350 feet from the boundaries
of such area, where a request concerning property
will be the subject of the hearing. Such notices
shall be sent by the City Council, and addresses
taken from current City records shall be deemed
sufficient for such notification.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THIS
24th DAY OF June , 1986.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ATTEST: By/
Paul Ackland, Mayor
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
7 --k
E
•
TIVI R,
JUNE 18, 1986
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HUTCHINSON, MN. 55350
DEAR SIRS:
CONFIDENTIAL
892027
Ji1* 1986
P,FXZPaD
sv —
6?
THE FOLLOWI NG IS AN ANALYSIS OF MONIES PAID TO JUNKER SANITATION
SERVICE BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THRU RATE INCREASES, COVERING
THE LAST FIVE YEARS.
JULY 10 1982- - - - - -- 3,000 CUSTOMERS (APPROX)
.35 INCREASE
$12,600.00
JULY 1, 1982- - - - - -- 3;050 CUSTOMERS (APPROX)
.15 INCREASE
$ 5,490.00
JULY 1, 1983- - - - - -- 3,100 CUSTOMERS (APPROX)
.00 INCREASE
.000
JULY 1, 1984- - - - - -- 3,150
.15
$5,670.
JULY 1, 1985- - - - - -- 3,200
.00
.000
CUSTOMERS (APPROX)
— INCREASE
00
CUSTOMERS (APPROX)
— INCREASE
TOTAL FIVE YEAR RAISE $23,760.00
LANDFILL INCREASES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS.
"Your Gorbologist" 7—d
James Junker.417 So. Martha St.. Stillwater, Mn. 55082.612 439 -7135
f
PAGE 2
THIS $23,760.00 WOULD NOT COVER THE EXPENSES OF OUR DRIVERS
WAGES, LET ALONE THE INCREASE IN INSURANCE PREMIUMS WHICH HAVE
DOUBLED AND TRIPLED IN THIS TIME PERIOD. THE INCREASE IN TRUCK
COSTS AND REPAIRS FOR EXAMPLE:
IN 1981 A PACKER BODY COST $27862.00
IN 1986 THE SAME PACKER BODY COSTS $33,667.00.
IN 1981 A TRUCK COST $52032.00
IN 1986 THE SAME TRUCK COSTS $66,000.00.
IN 1981 SALES TAX WENT FROM 4% TO 5%
IN 1986 SALES TAX IS 6 %.
AT THE TIME OF MY NEW CONTRACT, WE BUILT A NEW GARAGE, INSTALLED
RADIOS IN OUR TRUCKS AND CHANGED OUR OFFICE PROCEDURE. WE PAID
OUR MANAGER MORE MONEY WHICH WAS TO BE REFLECTED BACK THROUGH
MONTHLY INCREASES.
THE DRIVERS AT JUNKER SANITATION ARE NORMALLY GIVEN A $15.00
TO $20.00 PER WEEK INCREASE EACH YEAR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
1985. BUT THEY WILL BE REIMBURSED THIS YEAR.
SINCE 1981 5 MEN @ $15.00 TO $20.00 PER WEEK INCREASE
$1,000.00 PER YEAR.
5 YEARS EQUALS $5,000.00
FROM THE ABOVE I DO HOPE YOU WILL BE ABLE TO JUSTIFY THE IN-
CREASE OF $5.50 PER MONTH THAT JUNKER SANITATION IS REQUESTING.
SINCERELY ---
JAMES L. JUNKER,PRESIDENT
is
(612) 587 -5151
. f/UTC// CITY O F
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 11, 1986
Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY HALL
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: RATE INCREASE FOR JUNRER SANITATION
Dear Gary:
4P
N
?/ 111213)q S
' ` "! 1986,
REECEdVED
I have reviewed the information provided in the
Council packet concerning Junker Sanitation's request for an
increase in monthly rates. As I understand Mr. Junker's
request the request is based upon the provisions of paragraph
nine of the contract that states, "It is agreed by and between
the parties that effective July 1st of each year during the
term of this contract that the monthly rate charged by the
party of the first part will be automatically increased if the
landfill expenses or dump fees increased during that contract
year. Said increase will be identical in amount to the
increase of the landfill rates." The landfill charges by the
cubic yard and their rates will increase by $3.00 per cubic
yard as of July 1, 1986. Under the terms of paragraph nine
Mr. Junker seeks to have his monthly billing to residential
users increased by an amount corresponding to the $3.00 per
cubic yard landfill increase.
In 1985 Mr. Junker deposited 21,357 cubic yards of
refuse at the landfill. Assuming that this entire amount was
for residential refuse and also assuming that the 1986 amount
would roughly correspond to the 1985 amount, a $3.00 per cubic
yard increase in expenses would cost Mr. Junker an additional
$64,071 for a full calendar year. According to city staff
there are approximately 3,200 residential billings. If each
of these billings were increased by $3.00 per month,
Mr. Junker would receive an additional $9,600 in billings per
month. Over a 12 -month time frame he would receive an
additional $115,200 in billings. This would mean that his
increase in billings exceeded his expenses by $51,129 per
year.
Gary D. Plotz
June 11, 1986
Page Two
The clear purpose of the provisions of paragraph nine
is to permit Mr. Junker to pass the increase in expenses onto
the consumer rather than have Mr. Junker absorb them directly.
To accomplish this purpose the revenue raised by any increase
in charges should roughly correspond to the expenses generated
by the increase in landfill or dump fees.
There can be no question that Mr. Junker is entitled
to an increase in the monthly rate since the landfill expenses
or dump fees have increased during the prior contract year.
If the term "landfill rates" is interpreted to mean the dollar
charged per cubic yard, then Mr. Junker's interpretation of
the amount of monthly increase in the charge to the
residential users is a logical and literal interpretation of
paragraph nine.
The Council has proposed giving Mr. Junker a rate
increase that would provide for increased revenue over a
one -year time frame that would roughly correspond to his
annual increase in expenses. If his increase in expenses is
roughly $64,000 and there are 3,200 residential units, this
would mean that each residential unit would be required to pay
an additional $20.00 annually or approximately a $1.66
additional billing per month. These figures may nor �be
accurate due to incomplete information but they should show
that a billing substantially less than the $3.00 per month
requested increase should be sufficient to generate funds to
meet Mr. Junker's increased expenses. Obviously to
accommodate such an increase a different interpretation of
paragraph nine must be utilized. I would suggest that a
reasonable interpretation would be to equate the term
"landfill rates" with the term "landfill expenses ". If this
interpretation is utilized, then the monthly increase would be
any figure which would generate sufficiently increased income
to cover the landfill expenses. By stressing the landfill
expenses a more equitable solution is reached.
Another interpretation of paragraph nine is possible.
We could interpret the term "landfill rates" as the rate
generated by a cubic yard of refuse but relate that cubic yard
not to Mr. Junker but to the average residential user. If the
average residential user generates one cubic yard in a
three -month time frame and the cost for that cubic yard
increases by $3.00, then the increase in landfill expense,
dump fees or landfill rates for that individual user on a
r 1
U
Y
Gary D. Plotz
June 11, 1986
Page Three
monthly basis will be $1.00.
Of the three interpretations Mr. Junker's benefits
from being the most literal reading of the contract. I
believe that either of the alternative interpretations are
more equitable. If this matter were to be litigated, I can
make no accurate prediction as to its outcome.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Y� \
B
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
. JHS:dlp
•
(612) 587 -5151
H�rcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HUBS— NSON ,M!NN.55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: and City Council
' -------------- ---------- - - - - --
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, — City Administrator
----- --- -- ----- -------- - - - ---
SUBJECT: Past Precedent of Raises In Landfill Charges In Relation to
- -- -- ------ - - - ---
Rate crease
The new Junker Sanitation contract began July 1, 1980, and I have re-
searched six years of Council minutes relative to the yearly increases.
. Since the contract was approved, I find only one reference to landfill
charges in relation to a rate increase. Specifically, examine the last
two sentences of the minutes of July 13, 1982, p. 235. The minutes point
out that a proposed 45C increase is less than the amount the landfill
increases. On the second page (p. 236 --second to last paragraph) the
Council actually granted less than the 45C, 25�.
In regards to the interpretation of the contract, please refer to City
Attorney James Schaefer's letter.
cc: City Attorney
Encl.: July 13, 1982 Council Minutes
t-,11
the
vaca?..
land F;.
-king
par�.i .
i of
rk wi;•
the ;•.
py of
future
uld h2-
good '.x
hnolc:i
ust as
-arriet
r
235
ncil Minutes - July 13, 1982
RESOLUTION NO. 7200 - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - GRACE SANSTEAD
After discussion and the reading of the Resolution, the motion was
made by Alderman Carls to adopt Resolution No. 7200 entitled Res-
olution of Appreciation for Grace Sanstead. Motion seconded by
Alderman Beatty and unanimously approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 7232 - TRANSFERRING $10,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO
GENERAL FUND
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen,
seconded by Alderman Beatty, to waive reading and adopt Resolution
No. 7232 entitled Transferring $10,000 from Liquor Store to General
Fund. Motion unanimously carried.
BUILDING OFFICIAL'S MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1982
There being no discussion, the report was ordered by the Mayor to
be received for filing.
MINUTES OF NURSING HOME BOARD DATED MAY 20, 1982
There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor
to be received for filing.
MINUTES OF HOSPITAL BOARD DATED MARCH 13, 1982; MARCH 16, 1982;
APRIL 20, 1982; AND MAY 18, 1982
There being no discussion, the minutes were ordered by the Mayor
to be received for filing.
a UNFINISHED BUSINESS
ta,
REFUSE RATES BOFJULQU1, 1982 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
(DEFERRED JUNE
22, 1982)
Jim, Rick and Neil Junker and Attorney Lee LaBore were present.
Atty. LaBore represented Junker Sanitation. He stated that in 1980
the expired contract between the City and Junker Sanitation was re-
newed by the Council. It was requested that a 45C per month increase
for residential service and $1.00 per month per container on com-
mercial accounts be granted, with an ffe ""x2 L.Lu1j _1, 1982.
it was porn ere a een a 1O% per cubic yard increase from.
the Mcleod County Landfill, effective May 1, 1982. This requesteed
amount would represent a 6% increase.
11
U
r1
LJ
E
0
Minutes - July 13, iY54 U
Mr. Lowell Baumetz stated he objected to the $5.75 token the
for a pickup service he didn't need or want. He further Doi i
out the towns of Cokato, Dassel and Litchfield have unliml �'r1
refuse pickup at a charge of $4.00 per house. It was publ 417
opinion that this item should be open for a re -bid and sh�l -_,.
be looked into further.
Mr. Gordon Hedlund, owner of Country Club Terrace, comment_.'.
he also objected to the charges for service. He felt he s}bYl�
have the right to do business with someone else.
Alderman Beatty reported there were objections in 1980 when t1
Junker contract expired. It was put out for bids, and Junket
Sanitation was the top bidder. Therefore, the contract was
newed with the company.
The Board of Review was discussed, and Alderman Mlinar felt (t
should be made use of for people to air their complaints.
City Administrator Plotz commented that the City has a policy-_=
to bill citizens for retro- active costs. The new rates would%ft
to be put into the computer, and the time frame when this coultif
done would become the effective date for the increase. (-
Alderman Beatty moved to grant the residential increase of .45 „'
and $1.00 increase per container on commercial accounts. Moths
died for lack of a second.
tom:
Motion by Alderman Gruenhagen to increase residentiaff 252 er
e` and accept_ schedule of $1.00 per container -fY7p' irre
m ssible. Seconded by Berman:.
N Carls, with Aldermen Carls, Mlinar, Gruenhagen and Beatty votiy
aye and Mayor DeMeyer voting nay. Motion carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Gruenhagen to have a review t {I
set aside for commercial accounts to negotiate with the hauler,
Seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST AVENUE SOUTHWEST, NEMITZ PROPERTY (DE
JUNE 22, 1982)
City Engineer Priebe reported he had discussed the estimated �;”
costs for the Nemitz property with Mr. Art Benjamin
cis"
Jr. A di:
needs to be made regarding the sidewalk so it can be added toto
improvement projects, if necessary.!
In the absence of Mr. Benjamin at the Council meeting, the MO
was made by Alderman Carls to defer this item until the next
meeting. Seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried x
(c) CONSIDERATIN OF HOVERSTOEN /MR.RCORNELLFWRITHOFAVORABLE RECOMMEN ATIONM
M OF PLAN'
NING COMMISSION (DEFERRED JUNE 22, 1982)
(d)
(e)
A
REPORT ON
ADDITIONAL GROSS REVENUES (EST.) VS. ACTUAL LANDFILL PAYMENTS
JUNE 16, 1986
FOOTNOTES:
1. Based on a constant of 3,200 accounts, est. only.
2. Additional revenue on an annualized basis, est. only.
3. Source: Bullert Landfill Report - See attached.
�' J
ANNUALIZED
EFFECTIVE DATE
OF INCREASE
AMOUNT OF
f�
INCREASE
EST.
I
EST. ADDL.
2
ACTUAL
FROM
OF
ACCOUNTS
REVENUE
LANDFILL COSTS
IN CALENDAR YEAR
July
1,
1980
3.65
5.10
+ 1.45
X
3,200 X 12 mos. -
55,680/yr.
+ 1,404
(24,298 - 22,894)
(Old)
(New)
7 -1 -80
July
1,
1981
5.10
5.60
+ .50
X
3,200 X 12 mos. =
19,200 /yr.
+ 4,494
(28,792 - 24,298)
July
1,
1982
5.60
5.85
+ .25
X
3,200 X 12 mos. =
9,600 /yr.
+ 3,990
(32,782 - 28,792)
July
1,
1983
5.85
6.00
+ .15
X
3,200 X 12 =a.
5,760/yr.
+ 3,123
(35,905- 32,782)
July
1,
1984
6.00
6.75
+ .75
X
3,200 X 12 mos.
28,800 /yr.
+13,817
(49,722- 35,905)
July
1,
1985
6.75
6.75
-0-
3,200 X 12 mos. -
-0-
-0-
(No Increase)
Cumulative Sub -Total
119,040/yr.
26,828
(Based on 3.00 /yd. X 21,357 yd.
(est.)
Dumped in 1985)
July
1,
1986
6.75
11.25
5.50
X
3,200 X 12 mos.
201,200
64,071
Requested
Requested
TOTAL (est.)
$320,240
$90,969
FOOTNOTES:
1. Based on a constant of 3,200 accounts, est. only.
2. Additional revenue on an annualized basis, est. only.
3. Source: Bullert Landfill Report - See attached.
�' J
e. :f
,0A;U4Lt
.2i r9Y. �s
aye 98, s�
>a�y9a. >s
3S, 9�S• fS
S3 sa6�.�o
E
0
y
Ak')VUA cY
cuci�� i�
1971
/, qs
/E 897
�Brq
/370
/SPA
s r:
a. Ec
6/Qy
/YIit y
/�
>•bo
,�13s)
e. :f
,0A;U4Lt
.2i r9Y. �s
aye 98, s�
>a�y9a. >s
3S, 9�S• fS
S3 sa6�.�o
E
0
/ 0744 W 111/NS 0 dvv
Re s ��t�T�al : 3 o€*7
Gorq,nereea� 113
(�8$ (fir ma. li•QQ
-! S
I 5 Ss Te4d I yds. ;
Base= o� 6S a
.?/1357 — "Y 605, SS7 C-45 ;t C.
YaraiasL: f 3•eO lr fi'i j O -7 1
'r(o q 0')1 12 t Mo.) _ itef, 331. Per M. •
Tofid( 130crc&$e. :
Or 3/3 CASiale..T1 ;L : -Ry .7l �8L
3390 • • 353 Corn in a rc a1 'tali 7 Qy
1{Zr�FL 3089 Ck..o.aets) : /3.7'0 /2 Cn+ea = �l•le/ fGor7)
Prepwoof ;,Je. -t1sv _ 1.14 2 X1.0 p.r, ika x 3.10F? accrr j 124/
V of- NK
S 9y1 y /1(0.)= bpi 401 Pr. ;it aver cast— c,". O.c4-s
$ Yu rdaSe: _
211 357 X bG7o = /Y� 2 ;�3 yd.° r e-s;4 ,
ly) Z3j - 4.4ycfs3 Per Fes—pet—yr.
q. (. = t 2 Cr•e) : - 3 V ydsr Ps.r JhO. Pe, res
.3V x 3.00 U, 1.11 (COST) pa- CeJ.
(• 1'� X
309? -.,*3 1 111 X 12 (.-..) _ aq 21 2 30 E rcr. eosT)
�3w..ri *rs Praposa�
3200 O:ccTs Y�_.So e-0 s% 04 Wc. ptr.w.
3
Joe it X 3. ao J-&. cf `:11 tivc. _ J Q40o r 12. X 15 2oo
r,r .7111 too
1 .) q Q.C� cosT •� �Ouvcl �:ll rucre.�i. �r fps. x 3oF9 X /2wb =� y� �-
80m mtrGia.i 6,ccT> : 113 ..r a wc�ditat +d 3 e po.hTatr �y vlier
7%e Cid4t%" 11JCrec -S4 04 44N4;:11 C, "S1Z3 C.oa7r .v14'3,pv 1�rrd.�G,r
&ft erilia4 oxc.Tt -Uor. h We. 4 It V/1 ro0 ti h :1. woal�f be n,i avery�d --
1 Aar mo. Par "er. �-e s4t C
71 J kre3 ore. 44L UGS a 1? ST. awly�G
0
•
•
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Hu J: , - +: ^V;ti. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 12. 1986
TO: Mayor and Cit r— Council
-- ---- ---- ------ ------ --- - --
FROM: Ralph Neumann----- ---- ----- --- --- - --
SUBJECT: Green Castle Cul -de -s as — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
In reviewing the proposed turn - around and parking plans for Green
Castle project, it is my recommendation that we follow the original plans
requiring a cul -de -sac at the end of Fremont. Because of the additional
risk of property damage,I feel our large equipment should not go on private
property.
If overnight parking at Green Castle becomes a problem and the
overflow vehicles park in the cul -de -sac, I would request No Overnight
Parking signs be installed during snow removal months.
(612) 587 -5151
ya�cH" CITY OF HUTCHINSON
P/ HUTCHWSON. MINN 5,
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 20, 1986
T0: Mayor—and—City Council
---—---- -------- ---- -- - - -- --
FROM: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
------ ---------- ------ -- -- - - --
SUBJECT: Health Insurance - PHP
---- ------------- --- ---- - - - - --
Jim Breitbach and Jim Mandel will be in attendance at the Council
. meeting to answer any questions.
/ms
0
r-�?l
r�
(612) 587 -5151
/1%15 961;
HVTCH' C1 Y0F/CTCI`f0t€ °a'_
w
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST er G
HUTCHINSON, .M1NN. 55350
` `n6i5z8Z�29J
June 17, 1986
Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY HALL
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: CITY OF HUTCHINSON YS. REID
Dear Gary:
On June 17, 1985 the Hutchinson City Council rejected
Western National Mutual Insurance Company's proposal of 50%
settlement. At that meeting the Council directed initiation
of legal action on this matter if full settlement could not be
obtained. On May 15, 1986 I contacted the Western National
Mutual Insurance Company and informed them of this decision.
I am enclosing a copy of that letter for your records. On
June 51 1986 I received a communication from Mark W. Lapham,
attorney for Western National Mutual. This communication
again offered the same 50% settlement that had been rejected
by the council. I am enclosing a copy of that letter for your
files. Based upon that letter and the Council's direction, I
drafted a Summons and Complaint and forwarded said Summons and
Complaint to the Nicollet County Sheriff's Department for
service on the driver of the vehicle. I also provided
Mr. Lapham with a copy of the Summons and Complaint. I am
enclosing copies of all these documents for your records. On
today's date Mr. Lapham contacted me and made an offer of
settlement in the amount of 75% of the claim. I would
strongly suggest that this offer be accepted. Mr. Reid is now
claiming that the Hutchinson vehicle failed to signal its
right -hand turn. If this assertion is believed by the court
or a jury, a finding of 25% negligence on the part of the
municipality would be likely. In this instance I believe that
a 75% settlement offer is reasonable, especially since Western
National Mutual first indicated that they would be unwilling
to pay anything on this claim. Please have this matter placed
F E,
Gary D. Plotz
June 17, 1986
Page Two
on the council agenda for the next regularly scheduled
meeting.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON p
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosures
0
. (612) 587 -5151
HUny CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
May 15, 1986 FILE COPY
Western National Mutual Insurance Company
P.O. Box 1463
5350 West 78th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55440
ATTENTION: Bonnie Marsh
RE: YOUR INSURED L S R REID; CLAIM NO. A -80246
Dear Ms. Marsh:
• On May 13, 1986 Western National offered to reimburse
the municipality of Hutchinson for 508 of the damages
resulting from the accident of June 17, 1985 was discussed by
the Hutchinson City Council. The Council has rejected this
offer and again requests payment of the entire $436.92
estimated damages. Please forward a check made payable to the
City of Hutchinson in this amount directly to my office and I
will have the municipality execute any releases which you may
require.
You should be aware that the Council authorized
initiation of legal action on this matter if full settlement
is not obtained. Hopefully this can be avoided by a prompt
settlement.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
g -E
Mark W. Lapham
Attorney aw .
5350 WEST EST 7 78TT H STREET
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
TELEPHONE
1 -3809
June 5 1986 '
� CODE wREw CODE 612
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney FILE COp
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
RE: City of Hutchinson v. L @ K Reid
Date of Loss: 6 -17 -85
Dear Mr. Schaefer:
Please be advised I have been retained by Western National Mutual
Insurance Company regarding the above- referenced claim. I have
reviewed the Western National file including your letter of May
15, 1986.
Based upon my review of the file I do not agree with your
assessment that this is a case of 100% liability. Western
National's insured, Randall Reid, indicates that neither he nor .
his companion observed any turn signal on the City of Hutchinson
firetruck prior to its right turn directly in front of him. With
respect to passing on the right, if the street is of sufficient
width for two lines of traffic in each direction it is not
unlawful to pass on the right. Further, while I do not have a
statement from the City of Hutchinson's driver I would inquire as
to whether or not he saw the other vehicle and what evasive
action he took)if any.
The offer of Western National Mutual to settle for 50% of your
claim of $436.92 is still open. It is my understanding that the
insured, Randall Reid, did not submit a claim under the collision
portion of his policy. Therefore, Western National Mutual
Insurance Company does not have any subrogation interest in the
event a lawsuit was commenced. However, Mr. Reid may in fact
have a claim for damages to his vehicle.
Please review your file at your earliest convenience and contact
me regarding this offer of settlement.
Very truly yours,
Mark W. Lapham •
Attorney at Law
MWL /lp
0 FIL E
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF MC LEOD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
Vs.
RANDALL SCOTT REID,
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
COPY IN COUNTY COURT
CIVIL DIVISION
SUMMONS
The State of Minnesota to the above named Defendant:
You and each of you are hereby summoned and required to serve
upon plaintiff's attorney an answer to the complaint which is
• herewith served upon you, within Twenty (20) days after
service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of
service. If you fail to do so, judgment be default will be
taken against you and each of you for the relief demanded in
the complaint.
SCHAEFER LAW OFFICE
James H. Schaefer
Plaintiff's Attorney
105 -2nd Avenue Southwest
P.O. Box 363
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -0363
Dated: Phone: (612) 587 -7200
•
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF MC LEOD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
Plaintiff,
FILE COPY
IN COUNTY COURT
CIVIL DIVISION
VS. COMPLAINT
RANDALL SCOTT REID,
Defendant.
Plaintiff, for its claim against Defendant, states and alleges
as follows:
I.
0
The Plaintiff, City of Hutchinson, is a Municipal
Corporation within the state of Minnesota with its principal •
address 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
II.
The Defendant, Randall Scott Reid, is an adult
resident of the State of Minnesota residing at 326 West
Nassau, St. Peter, Minnesota 56082.
III.
On the 16th day of June, 1985, on a public highway
called Roberts Road, in Hutchinson, Minnesota, Defendant
negligently drove a motor vehicle against a motor vehicle
owned by Plaintiff City of Hutchinson which was then making a
right -hand turn from said highway.
IV.
As a result of said negligent driving the motor
vehicle owned by Plaintiff City of Hutchinson was damaged in
an amount of $436.92. .
•
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against
Defendant in the sum of $436.92.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
105 -2nd Avenue Southwest
P.O. Box 363
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dated: Phone; (612) 587 -7200
0
U
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 11, 1986
FILE copy
The Nicollet County Sheriff's Dept.
St. Peter, MN 56082
RE: CITY OF HUTCHINSON VS. RANDAtt SCOTT REID
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find the original and one copy of the
Summons and Complaint in the above - captioned matter. Please
serve the copy upon Mr. Randall Scott Reid, 326 West Nassau,
St. Peter, MN 56082 at your earliest convenience. When
service has been made, please send the original and the
Affidavit of Service to my office together with a billing for
your expenses. Prompt payment of your services will then be
made.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosures
L.J
�_ E,
. JAMES H. SCHAEFER
A770A=T AT LAW
lob 7.d A... S. W.
P. O. N.. "3
HUTCHINSON, MN 69380 -0363
1- GM"7.7100
June 11, 1986
Opy
Mark W. Lapham
5350 West 78th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55435
RE: CITY OF HUTCHINSON VS. ALLEN R. REID
Dear Mr. Lapham:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 5, 1986.
This letter basically reoffers Western National Mutual
Insurance Company's previous proposal for settlement. This
has already been rejected by the Hutchinson City Council at
its June 17. 1985 regularly scheduled meeting. At that
meeting the Council directed initiation of legal action on
this matter if full settlement could not be obtained.
Pursuant to that direction I have drafted a Summons and
Complaint in this matter and forwarded it to the Nicollet
County Sheriff's Department for service upon Mr. Reid. I am
enclosing a copy of that Summons and Complaint for your files.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosure
0
CU MAY 195
GILMER LAW OFFICE NCFIVF.D
95 Second Avenue S.E. o �o
. P.O. Box 338
ROGER L. GILMER Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350v'\� lg�l�sl91%02\ \` Area Code 612
Attorney At Law a Telephone 587 -3757
May 27, 1986
Mr. Gary Plotz a1 V \
City Hall
�y ,
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Mike's Mobil North
Dear Gary:
Enclosed is a statement from Juul Contracting to Mike's Mobil in
the amount of $1,706.60 for repair of his water service. As I
understand it, the break or leak occurred west of the curb and in
the street. As I understand its the city's policy is that the
property owner pays for the repair from the main even though the
leak may occur outside the property owner's boundaries. This
does not seem to be fair. It has also come to my attention that
there have been several other property owners with similar
problems and that there is some indication the piping when it was
initially installed was inadequate. Since the city prepares the
specification for the pipe and supervises its installation, if
there is deficient pipe this would seem to be the city's problem
and not the property owner's.
My purpose in writing to you is to see if the council would
consider relieving Mike of this payment in view of the
circumstances.
If you have any questions, feel free to get back to me.
Cordially,
GILME ,F LAW OFFICE
plw„/
Roder L. Gilmer
RLG /slj
• Encl.
yr
April 12
U
STATEMENT
HUTCHINSON, MN 55350, May 1 1986
IN ACCOUNT WITH
JUUL CONTRACTING CO.
P.O. BOX 184
L_J
—F
J
)b
On Main St. Repair Water Service
3/4" Copper 25' @ 1.50
37
50
3/4" Curb Stop 1 ea.
23
00
3/8" Cable 50 l.f.
35
00
Cl. V Gravel 5 c.y. @ 5.00
25
00
Concrete (High Early)4 c.y. @ 68.40
273.60
John Deere 3,15 hrs. @ 45.00
15
50
Unit 2 hrs. @ 60.00
12
00
Labor
1 03
00
$ 1,70E
60
A 1 I % finance charge (18% Annual percentage rate) will be added to the unpaid
MAY
2
balance of your account which is more than 30 days past due.
—F
J
)b
(612) 567 -5151
HUT�y / CITY OF HUTCHINSON
1
f I �J)�V J
M E M O
DATE: June 13, 1966
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Water Needs Update
I have been informed that the work has been completed on the above- referenced
study and the report will be completed shortly.
To complete a study and report on the feasibility of utilizing the emergency
generator at the present sewage treatment plant for stand -by service at the
• water plant, would cost about $700.00. The present funds approved for the
Needs Study have exhausted. Dick and I agree that the generator should be
used at the water plant, if possible, and recommend approval of the cost for
the additional study.
MVP /pv
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
Y,'- (f�
•
i
(672) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
'HINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 24, 1986
T0: ,. Mayor & City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Water Billing Department
SUBJECT: Delinquent accounts for the month of June
------------------- - - - - --
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water accounts for the
month of June. Recommend water service be discontinued on Monday,
June 30, 1986 at Noon.
D vid Beac
11 50 St, aul St
C" Co' W 63141
1104 a e St
3 -690- 04 -021
80.02
cc: M lton chantzen
Box 20
Hut inson MMN 5350
Richard Sturges
Rt. 1
Silver Lake MN 55381
534 Madson
2- 675 - 0534 -053
67.39
cc: Dan Johnson
10401 Co. Rd 62 W
Eden Prairie MN 55344
Karen Curtis
775 2nd Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
486 California St
3- 275 - 0486 -052
242.19
cc: Vance Woller
486 California St.
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises ;25 /month thru August;
Imo,
Jerome Swenson
145 2 Av SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
145 2 Av SE
1- 030 - 0145 -081
161.16
Anda Properties
508 32nd Av
Moorhead MN 56560
987 Echo Dr
1- 370 - 0987 -071
635.19
Jerome Rauch
587 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
587 Franklin
1- 395 - 0587 -024
7.84
cc: Mary Barrick
1000 E 14th St
Mpls MN 55401
Resop Realty
4820 Excelsior Blvd 119
Mpls MN 55416
221 Freemont
1- 400 - 0221 -071
471.51
Promises 7/28
wit Maus
545 ssan St S
Hutc son MN 55350
545 as n St S
1 -4 0 -05 -091
78 0
Anda Properties Lawrence Larson
508 32nd Av Rt. 1
Moorhead MN 56560 Silver Lake MN 55381
991 Echo Or 548 Franklin St S
1- 370 -0991 -011 1- 395 - 0548 -001
620.04 55.02
Andrew Ross Darla Smith
645 Franklin St S 745 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
645 Franklin St S 745 Franklin St S
1- 395 - 0645 -022 1- 395 - 0745 -011
86.55 104.24
cc: John Wagner
825 Grove St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Resop Realty
•
Troy Hoffman
Arlene Otto
654 2 Av SW
726 Brown St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
138 6 Av SE
726 Brown St
1 -100- 0138 -023
1-270- 0726 -041
77.39
74.62
cc: Roy Heller
cc: Bev Wangerin
6610 Pipewood Curve
105 Judson Rd
Excelsior MN 55331
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 6/26
Promises 711
Anda Properties Lawrence Larson
508 32nd Av Rt. 1
Moorhead MN 56560 Silver Lake MN 55381
991 Echo Or 548 Franklin St S
1- 370 -0991 -011 1- 395 - 0548 -001
620.04 55.02
Andrew Ross Darla Smith
645 Franklin St S 745 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
645 Franklin St S 745 Franklin St S
1- 395 - 0645 -022 1- 395 - 0745 -011
86.55 104.24
cc: John Wagner
825 Grove St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Resop Realty
Emily Quast
4820 Excelsior Blvd 119
1321 SE 6th St.
Mpls Mn 55416
Mpls MN 55414
223 Freemont
325 Hassan St
1- 400 - 0231 -051
1- 480 - 0325 -055
625.71
18.40
Promises 7/28
Alton icklund
Randy Mulligan
5 M in St S
630 Second Av SE
Hut inson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
605 Ma' St S
630 Second Ave SE
1- 85 -06 -091
1 3.47
3- 030 - 0630 -064
102.52
cc: Vicky Klabunde
Rt 1 Box 218
Brownton Mn 55312
0
0
0
hutchinson
community
hospital
1095 Highway 15 South. Hutchinson. Minnesota 55350 • Telephone 6121587 -2148 "An Equal Opportunity Employer"
June 19, 1986
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland
and Members of the City Council
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members:
The Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors considered at
their last meeting a proposal to remodel the Business Office. Attached
you will find a copy of the proposed project as submitted by our
architects. It is estimated that the project, including furnishings,
will cost approximately $65,000. After consideration of staff request
the governing body passed the following motion:
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Ewald, to request
approval from the City Council to proceed with remodeling
of the Business Office at a cost of approximately $65,000.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
The hospital intends to act as general contractor on this project.
It is anticipated that no single contract will be awarded in excess of
$15,000, so consequently we will not be advertising for bids. We will,
however, be obtaining bids from a number of contractors to insure
compliance with the uniform bidding laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mr. Bill Rosenow, Assistant Administrator, will be available at the
meeting to answer any questions that you may have. Thank you in
advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
I TC "'S" CQIgMUNITV HOSPITAL
Philip G. Graves
Administrator
PGG:slk
Encl.
q�
I�
AP141 Or
r
3090m=-
_ T,
oirr
_a -
rJ)•
i1 6.. _
� �M
(612) 587 -5151
yarn CITY OF HUTCHINSON
i v✓:+J ��.� "�aAv�`�1C vwEJT
HD' Ch1NS1 -N ,A,',; 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 20, 1986
T0: —Mayor and City Council
-----------------------------
FROM: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Liability Insurance Coverage Renewals
--- --------- --------- --- - - -- --
We anticipate by Tuesday night to have received quotes from Dennis Potter
• on insurance renewals. Mark Flaten of American Risk Services will be re-
viewing them.
We are hopeful to have something to present to the City Council on Tues-
day night.
/ms
9-0- 1
r�
U
I
1985 -86
LEAGUE
1ST VALLEY VIEW
PROPERTY I
i
238,898
I I
I 48,292 I
I
88,170
GEN LIABILITY I
I
INCLUDED
I I
I 109,369 I
I
I
71,287
AUTOMOBILE I
60,011
I
I 33,923 i
I
94,556
PUBLIC I
I
I I
I
I
OFFICIAL I
I
4,253
I 5,350 I
5,350
BOILER & I
I I
I I
I
I
MACHINERY I
I
INCLUDED
I 4,424 I
4,424
LIQUOR I
I
INCLUDED
I I
I 12,500 I
I
I
12,500 i
INLAND I
i
I I
i
I
MARINE I
I
INCLUDED
I 3,373 I
3,528
MONEY I
INCLUDED
I I
I 1,744 I
I
INCLUDED
I
03OND I
I
INCLUDED
I I
I 3,014 I
I
3,784
LAW ENFORCEMENTI
7,596
I I
I 11,237 I
I
11,237
AIRPORT I
I
4,250
I 4,250 I
4,250
WORK COMP I
I
155,061
I I
I 148,990 I
I
148,990 I
BUSSES I
I
4,535
I I
I INCLUDED I
I
INCLUDED
GAS LIABILITY I
I
15,460
I I
I 23,018 I
I I
I
23,018 I
I
i
DAM I
INCLUDED
I I
I NO COVERAGE I
I
INCLUDED
TOTALS
490,064
409,484
471,094
RESERVE ASSESSMENT
19,972
TOTAL
429,456
MAJOR COVERAGE CHANGES
1. No liability coverage on the dam
2. $250 deductible on all PD liability claims
3. No pollution liability
4. Vehicle changes must be reported within 30 days
5. Need Authorization for liquor liability - Deposit premium $12,500
•
9 -e,
/ (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M O
DATE: June 17th, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Subdivision Agreement
Taradiddle Acres
Attached is the above- referenced agreement that has been approved by the
developer and City Attorney.
Subsequent to your approval and execution, it will be ready for recording.
MVP /pv
attachment
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
9 �-
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
TARADIDDLE ACRES
ACOMA TOWNSHIP
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between Gerald and Diane Gassman, hereinafter called the
"Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation in the
County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a certain
subdivision known as TARADIDDLE ACRES, which is located in Acoma Township in
McLeod County, Minnesota, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance requires subdividers to make certain improvements
in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Subsequent to annexation of TARADIDDLE ACRES SUBDIVISION into the
City, it will be necessary to install sanitary sewer, sanitary sewer
service leads, watermain and water service leads to serve all lots in
the plat; to construct storm sewer to serve the plat; to grade, place
gravel base, construct curb and gutter and a permanent roadway
surface.
2. It is understood and agreed that the improvements required in
Paragraph No. 1 may be constructed under several contracts and may be
completed during several construction seasons.
3. It is understood and agreed that the total improvement cost for each
contract will be assessed equally to each lot in the Subdivision.
4. It is understood and agreed that upon annexation, each lot will be
required to make a Parks and Playground Contribution to the City as
per the City's scheduled cost at the time of annexation, based on the
following lot sizes:
Lot
1 -
59,241
square
feet
Lot
2 -
158,122
square
feet
Lot
3 -
59,241
square
feet
5. Any future re- subdivision into smaller city lots shall require a new
plat and new Subdivision Agreement.
6. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
7. It is understood and agreed that this instrument will be recorded, by
the City, subsequent to execution by both parties and the signing of
the plat. The Subdivider agrees to pay any and all recording fees
for this instrument.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said Gerald and Diane Gassman, have hereunto set
their hands this day of , 19_.
Gerald Gassman Diane Gassman
•
•
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19_, by Gerald
Gassman and Diane Gassman, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
Approved by the City Council on the _ day of , 19_.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Paul L.
Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Ploti, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
(612) 587.5151
Hu�cH i CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M O
DATE: June 17th, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Subdivision Agreement
Stillings -Hoeft Addition
Attached is the above- referenced agreement that has been submitted to the
developer and City Attorney for approval. It is anticipated no changes will
be requested.
Subsequent to your approval and execution by the City, it will be ready for
• recording.
MVP /pv
attachment
•
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
q-
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
STILLINGS HOEFT ADDITION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between Harlow C. and Ruth A. Stillings, hereinafter
called the "Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation
in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City ";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a certain
subdivision known as Stillings Hoeft Addition, which is located in the City of
Hutchinson, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires subdividers to make
certain improvements in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Subdivider hereby petitions for the
A. Sanitary Sewer
B. Watermain
C. Sub -grade Street
D. Gravel Base
E. Curb and Gutter
F. Surfacing
following improvements:
It is understood and agreed that said improvements will be
constructed under several contracts, beginning in 1986. The
Subdivider waives all rights to Public Hearings and appeal for the
cost of the improvements. The waiving of all such rights shall be
binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and
successors of the Subdivider.
It is understood and agreed that the total cost of the improvement
will be assessed on a front foot basis.
2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider will make a cash
contribution to the City of Hutchinson for Parks and Playground for
Stillings Hoeft Addition in the amount of $406.56, which is for one
dwelling unit per lot. Charges for additional dwelling units per lot
will be due at the time a Building Permit is issued and the cost will
be according to the City Fee Schedule for additional units at the
time said permit is issued.
3. It shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to clear trees
and /or debris from utility easements, as per the request of the
utility prior to installation of the facility.
4. It is understood and agreed that all electrical and gas lines in
easements that may have to be moved by request of the property owner,
will be done at said property owners expense.
5. It is understood and agreed that to fulfill City Policy, two trees
will be provided in the margin (boulevard) of each lot. The
Subdivider or property owner shall purchase from the City and pay one
half the cost of said trees and the City's portion of the payment for
0
r �
the trees shall not exceed $10.00 per tree. Said trees shall be
planted by the property owner.
The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to install two trees per lot
. and assess the properties in the subdivision, the cost less allowed
City's portion of said cost. Said installation to be included in
the last assessable improvement to be installed for the subdivision.
All trees installed at the time of said last assessable improvement
will be credited to the properties where the trees are located.
Species selection will be determined by the Tree Board. Should the
Subdivider or property owner wish to plant a tree which deviates from
the selected specie list, he /she must present his /her request to the
Tree Board.
The City will, at no charge to the property owner, replace any tree
which dies within one year of the time of planting.
6. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
7. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office
and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is
recorded.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said Harlow C. Stillings and Ruth A. Stillings, have
hereunto set their hands this _ day of , 19_.
• Harlow C. Stillings Ruth A. Stillings
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Harlow C.
Stillings and Ruth A. Stillings, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
Approved by the City Council on the _ day of
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this _ day of , 19_, by Paul L.
Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
612) 587.5151
H mcA l CITY OF HUTCHINSON
M E M O
DATE: June 17th, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Subdivision Agreement
Northern View Acres
Attached is the above- referenced agreement that has been submitted to the
developer and City Attorney for approval. It is anticipated no changes will
be requested.
Subsequent to your approval and execution by the City, it will be ready for
• recording.
MVP/PV
attachment
J
-�m
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
9�
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
NORTHERN VIEW ACRES
HUTCHINSON TOWNSHIP
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between George J. and Irene Herbert, hereinafter called
the "Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation in the
County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a certain
Subdivision known as NORTHERN VIEW ACRES, which is located in Hutchinson
Township in McLeod County, Minnesota, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance requires subdividers to make certain improvements
and park donation in or for the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Subsequent to annexation of NORTHERN VIEW ACRES SUBDIVISION into the
City, it will be necessary to install sanitary sewer mains, sanitary
sewer service leads, watermain and water service leads to serve each
lot in the subdivision. It will be necessary to construct a lateral
storm sewer system within the subdivision to serve all of the
subdivision. It will be necessary to grade, place gravel base, •
construct curb and gutter and a permanent road surface on all the
streets.
2. It is understood and agreed that the improvements required in
Paragraph No. 1 may be constructed under several contracts and may be
completed during several construction seasons.
3. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the sanitary
sewer main system and sanitary sewer service leads for the entire
subdivision will be under one contract and that the total improvement
cost will be assessed equally to each lot in the subdivision.
4. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the watermain
system and water service leads for the entire subdivision will be
under one contract and the total improvement cost will be assessed
equally to each lot in the subdivision.
5. It is understood and agreed that any cost assessable to the
subdivision for the extension of the City's sanitary sewer system and
water system to the subdivision to serve the subdivision will be
assessed equally to each lot in the subdivision.
6. It is understood and agreed that the construction of the lateral
storm sewer system within the subdivision will be under one contract
and the total improvement cost will be assessed equally to each lot .
in the subdivision.
7. It is understood and agreed that the improvement of all the streets
in the subdivision by grading and gravel base will be under one
contract and the total improvement cost will be assessed equally to
each lot in the subdivision.
• 8. It is understood and agreed that the construction of curb and gutter
on all the streets in the subdivision will be under one contract and
the total improvement cost will be assessed equally to each lot in
the subdivision.
9. It is understood and agreed that the construction of a permanent road
surface on all the streets in the subdivision will be under one
contract and the total improvement cost will be assessed equally to
each lot in the subdivision.
10. It is understood and agreed that any trunk storm sewer system that is
constructed by the City that will serve the subdivision will be
assessed by the City to all properties served by the system. The
Northern View Acres lots will be assessed according to the City's
assessment policy for Trunk Storm Sewer Systems at the time said
system is built.
11. It is understood and agreed that each lot in the subdivision will be
required to make a Parks and Playground Contribution to the City as
per the City's Parks and Playground Contribution Schedule Cost at the
time of annexation. Said payment schedule is for one (1) dwelling
unit per lot and additional dwelling units require an additional
payment.
• 12. Any future re- subdivision into smaller city lots shall require a new
plat and new Subdivision Agreement. Said Agreement shall include all
sections deemed necessary from this agreement.
13. It is understood and agreed that all lots in the subdivision will be
used for residential purposes only. No commercial or industrial land
use will be permitted.
14. It is understood and agreed that the lots cannot be subdivided into
the proposed smaller lots by metes and bounds. Any such subdividing
shall be accomplished as per Paragraph No. 12.
15. It is understood and agreed that all improvements described in
Paragraph No. 1 on Herbert Drive and Litchfield Road, be paid by the
owners of Northern View Acres. No costs will be assessed to
properties in Boyle's Addition, Auditor's Lot 23 to the West; that
portion of Auditor's Lot to the South or David Lee Acres Subdivision.
16. It is understood and agreed that no access to State Highway No. 15
from Lot 3, Block 3, will be permitted.
17. It is understood and agreed that no Building Permits will be
requested and no building construction begun until all roadways have
been constructed and approved by Hutchinson Townboard, County Zoning
Administrator and County Engineer. Copy of said approval to be
. furnished City. Within 10 days after said approval, the present
access for David Lee Acres to State Highway No. 15 shall be removed
and access to Herbert Drive for David Lee Acres shall be completed.
City shall be notified by developer when same is completed and City
can inspect and confirm same.
18. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. •
19. It is understood and agreed that this instrument will be recorded, by
the City, subsequent to execution by both parties and the signing of
the plat. The Subdivider agrees to pay any and all recording fees
for this instrument.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said George J. and Irene Herbert, have hereunto set
their hands this _ day of 19_.
George J. Herbert Irene Herbert
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19_, by George J.
Herbert and Irene Herbert, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
Approved by the City Council on the _ day of
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor is
Its City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Paul L.
Ackland, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
E
El
•
G. O.COMER J1914-15167)
RONALD J. Mi,GRAW
June 16, 1986
City Council
City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
R. J. MCGRAW, P.A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
P.O. BO% Be
CITIZENS BANK BUILDING
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 553SO
Re: R. J. McGraw, d/b /a
Century View Co.
Attention: Marilyn Swanson
Dear Mrs. Swanson:
TELEPHONE
612- SB1 -39oo
JUNR�
0
m
This letter shall serve as a request to be placed on the City Council
Agenda for Tuesday, June 24, 1986, for approval to split Lot 7, Block 1,
SCHMIDTBAUERS SECOND ADDITION. After the split, the legal description will
be as follows, to -wit:
The East Half of Lot 7, Block 1,
and
The West Half of Lot 7, Block 1,
Thank you in advance.
RJM:bw
Yours truly,
1?„�'aw,
R. J. McGraw
SECOND ADDITION
SECOND ADDITION.
9G
May 28, 1986
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. West
Hutchinson, MN. 55350
Attn: Gary Plotz,
City Administrator
Dear Mr. Plotz,
C �
�y
,/g456789'
,,g86
N y
This writing follows our phone conversation and is sub-
mitted as my formal request for the deferment of all storm
sewer, water, sanitary sewer, and road curb and gutter improve-
ments on lot 6 of Padens 1st Addition to the City of Hutch-
inson. I am leasing this land for farming.
This request is for all unpaid assessments on the above
mentioned lot and until such time as the property can be dev-
(--"eloped.
Your earliest response to this request is appreciated.
Sincerely, /
Michael 3. Wilhelmson
'_Michael J. Wilhelmson
11869 Evergreen Circle
Coon Rapids, MN. 55433
�N
(612) 587.5151
HTY OF HUTCH1 INSON C 07
M E M O
DATE: June 13, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Robert's First Addition
Drainage Improvements
According to my study of the field data collected, the drainage problem for the
above- referenced area can be improved by constructing the following, as shown
on the attached drawing.
1. Additional 15" line with new manholes and catch basins on Roberts
. Road and Larson Street.
Total Estimated Cost $21,900.00.
2. Additional risers and lines between Larson Street and Kay Street as
shown on the enclosed drawing.
Total Estimated Cost $7,200.00.
3. New line on property east of Roberts First Addition and a berm to
control drainage.
Total Estimated Cost $4,400.00.
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP
attachment
cc: Cal Rice
Residents in Robert's First Add,
0
about 50 people were taken away on, the idle I rengnt train.
nave the necessary narawdre To oe sate.
Rent l program ready for council's review
corrected. There will be an additional charge for a third
inspection, if it's needed, Anderson said
This certification will be valid for three years, when a
re- inspection must be made. Cost of re- inspection has
not4jeen set.
Under the program, rental property owners could
voluntarily ask to have their units inspected.
If the minimum building standards were met, or if
necessary repairs were completed to meet the stan-
dards, the property would be included in a list available
at the Owatonna Area Chamber of Commerce and city
hall.
Any recommendations the authority makes must
receive final approval by the city council.
On Monday, new members attended their first
meetings. Appointed to the commission were aldermen
Chuck Wolden and Ray Truelson. Reappointed was
alderman Gene Lenard, and Lowell Schultz.
By MIKE LAGERQUIST
Pro" staff writer .
OWATONW — The Owatonna Housing and
Redeveleposaiat Authority ha completed its work on a
voktotary rental certification program.
At its meeting Monday, the HRA approved the hiring
of Pact Mc(iaff teeompiete the inspections for minimum
6uildling standards, according to Roberta Anderson, who
was re- elected as chairman.
Quaadons risprding the amount and type of insurance
Mc<Wf hunt carry were not answered, but will be
presented to A* city council, for its investigation. An-
ditvw aid,,
'"M city,, overall, is responsible, and they should
make the deebion (about Insurance) along with our
attorneys, "W*aid.
In a list of qualifications presented at the April
meeting, the commission discussed , requiring a
minimum of $1 million professional liability insurance,
as well as errors and omission coverage. The question of
needed coverage is too complex for the commission to
make itself, Anderson said Tuesday.
There will be a base fee of $60 per inspection, An-
derson said, with an additional $15 for each unit more
than four. The property owner will pay one -third of the
cost, and the HRA will cover the remaining two-thirds
from its $50,000 balance.
"The rate of one -third to the owner and two-thirds for
the HRA is to get the program started," she said. "It's
not set in stone, so if it becomes a burden for the HRA we
may make it 50.50."
This fee will include an initial inspection when
deficiencies will be pointed out to landlords, and a re-
inspection to check that those deficiencies have been
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of "Woodridge" as submitted by Pat Mikuleck and
evin ompton
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary plat.
HISTORY
. On May 30, 1986, Pat Mikulecky and Kevin Compton submitted a preliminary
plat to be known as "Woodridge." A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Monday, June 16, 1986, at which time
there was no one present who stated their objection to the request.
Neighboring property owner, Melvin Ziemer, was present to suggest an
alternate plan for Campbell Lane.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 5, 1986.
3. Director of Engineering, Marlow Priebe provided a certificate of
compliance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per
"Preliminary Plat Data ".
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned preliminary plat be approved.
• Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Comoisson
/ / ,
RESOLUTION NO. 8309
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF WOODRIDGE .
WHEREAS, Pat Mikulecky and Kevin Compton, owners and subdividers of the
property proposed to be platted as WOODRIDGE have submitted an application
for approval of the preliminary plat of said subdivision in the manner
required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
The south 100.00 feet of Government Lot 3 and the north 315.00 feet
of Government Lot 4, Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West
of the Fifth Prinicpal Meridian, except the east 495.00 feet
thereof, City of Hutchinson.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
That said plat of WOODRIDGE is hereby approved and accepted by the
City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and •
regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June , 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
? �' lk��
•
11 1 .0 _
>.o0 40
w
I o
3.00
PR 5 9 Y 2 S
G� K W
q�o S 8 4 S .
3
o0
1 J
U. 00 m4.00
1 w :as.ao P 00
m
� 8 OUTLOT e
Q R e
o x .eo
, e�l n4.00
4 -
N
3
AREA TO BE PLATTED
yyy AS "WOODRIDGE" = 2 OF
v
1 1 U
�J
4
�LLJ i_ L VI
3 ti F - --
c
n 2
9i
�N
Q I?I
�JI
>_
of n
4
5
a
0�
_ 6 _
_ 7 _
0
0 6 e
o
9 •
0 °
Io
I I
HILLTOP
4
131.00.
n•.00
n4.00
-
2".0
S Ha
33 2
- z ,3
••. .• �,c
�.
c 4 0
.e
9
li
d
§73
• e
$
33 21 i6.
193.13
2
1
o�
e
0
L
A'
9
90.G 11300
^ r
3
o 0 6
� e
4
- 5
5
v�4
0.
�
3
w
Y
7
: cr 2
Q
0
6
V I
@46
N4. 0
134.00
134.00
5
4
i
6
3
7
2
$
of n
4
5
a
0�
_ 6 _
_ 7 _
0
0 6 e
o
9 •
0 °
Io
I I
HILLTOP
4
131.00.
w
Zt,P
U
V
4o
LANE
2
134.00 134.00
-
2".0
S Ha
33 2
- z ,3
••. .• �,c
�.
c 4 0
§73
33 21 i6.
193.13
ry'
0 r
0
L
A'
9
90.G 11300
o I
- ENP QRT
1 .00 Fla
m� 0
Ale
° 2 i 3
J3 3
66
wJ ��
66 /
CSB
(612) 587.5151
kvUlfllf ! CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. 3:7 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
/ HUT CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: June 2, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and
1,-6ity Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Woodridge Preliminary Plat
2 hereby certify that the Preliminary Plat submitted by Pat Mikulecky and
Kevin Compton meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as
per "Preliminary Plat Data".
A Subdivision Agreement will be required outlining when improvements will
. be made and how costs will be assessed. The Parks and Playground Contribution
according to the City payment schedule, will be $1,359.82.
MVP /pv
0
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
%-K
(612) 587 -5151
Harty' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHlNSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminar Plat of "Plaza It hts" as submitted b First State
Tank of rownton ( Larry Herrmann Citizens State Bank of Gibbo
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary plat.
HISTORY
On May 30, 1986, Larry Herrmann and Dennis Albertson submitted a preliminary
plat to be known as "Plaza Heights." A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Monday, June 16, 1986, at which time
there was no one present who stated their objection to the request.
Neighboring property owners present stated their concern about driveways
onto South Grade Road.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 5, 1986.
3. Director of Engineering, Marlow Priebe provided a certificate of
compliance with the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per
"Preliminary Plat Data ".
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned preliminary plat be approved, with the understanding that before
the final plat is considered the developer will be able to get an easement
from the adjoining property owner for Columbus Street and Chicago Avenue or
change streets (to be within confines of developer's property).
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
RESOLUTION NO. 8310
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT
OF PLAZA HEIGHTS .
WHEREAS, Citizens State Bank Gibbon, State Bank of Morgan and First
State Bank of Brownton, owners and subdividers of property proposed to be
platted as PLAZA HEIGHTS have submitted an application for approval of the
preliminary plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of
land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 of LIPKE ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof. The South Half of the North Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, township
116 North, Range 30 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian. The
North 30.00 feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West
of the Fifth Principal Meridian, City of Hutchinson.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: •
That said plat of PLAZA HEIGHTS is hereby approved and accepted by the
City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June , 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary u. Niotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ack an
Mayor
qJ
•
z
b
3j h
oN Q' I
0
r °
Q
'0 a5 P
y
CHRIST THE KING
LUTHERAN CHURCH
e 153.90
9
e 8
CRAIG
-
t-
0
AVE
„ L
9
M
woo
•.
{4 11
1.❑ f • f N
800 e00
e944 V
113.60 e e 2
B
l
N 6 R n T n z6 N 4 0
3
L
2°
V
z
b
3j h
oN Q' I
0
r °
Q
'0 a5 P
y
CHRIST THE KING
LUTHERAN CHURCH
e 153.90
120M
e 8
{�.
-
-
-
W n
- 9300 9000
M
woo
9000
14
l
°
120
e
I 2
3
4
1I
5
5
6 -
J
9
�
neo
7 °
g °
9516 "G
N
gpAO
9000
0302
-
9684
500
6430
p
'
OUTLOT
m
e
"'r '
AVE.
NEAL
W09-
5a)S
04 O 0
1150
50
r
_n
54
s
0
s
a
g
0 l o
w
N
2
V)
d LORENS
es
Z
NIM04W
2
Ln
3
;
(612) 587.5151
• HUTCH j CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O
DATE: June 2, 1986
TO- P;!nning Commission and
amity Council
FROM: Director of Engineerinq
RE: Plaza Heights Preliminary Plat
I hereby certify that the Preliminary Plat submitted by the Citizens Bank of
Gibbon, State Bank of Morgan and First State Bank of Brownton (terry Herrmann
and Dennis Albertson) meets all the requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance as per "Preliminary Plat Data ".
• A Subdivision Agreement will be required outlining when additional improvements
will be made and how the existing and future costs will be assessed. The
Parks and Playground Contribution, according to the City Payment Schedule will
be $3,221.68.
MVP /pv
r�
L_J
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
( —f
(612) 587 -5151
;v�rcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
_ NUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0 R A N 0 U M
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Vacation of portion of Colorado Street as petitioned
Pursuant to Section 5.962 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned petition to vacate a portion of
a platted street.
iHISTORY
On June 2, 1986, Tyrone Hel land submitted a petition to vacate a portion of
Colorado Street from the center of Eighth Avenue to 340' south. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
Monday, June 16, 1986, at which time there were several persons present who
stated their objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fees paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 5, 1986,
and on Tuesday, June 10, 1986.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned petition to vacate an easement be rejected, as the vacation would
cause Helland's Seventh Addition to be in direct violation of Subdivision
Ordinance #466, Section 5.213, and upon recommendation of the Utilities
Commission to reject.
. Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
v � �� �w�z• -� �e rte____ �
Ae 171? 70�5 Ace
-GCS HAVE j
' SHADY RIDGE
7
c �
; , D o
I o
;•LORADC STREET p
c
ri
- I z
I I �
z
i i y c
-
• I � � m
e` Oct
� i x
I
> 1
I z• � v
0
I I 2
I I qsf z -
i m
GT I Oy o
Gq I c;
F I I
I � �
Z
I IgTTiy � ,�
I I
I I c
I I
I I
I 1
i
SCHOOL - /}
SMt" r
SHADY RIDGE
1
T � I
I
I
2 I -
G '
I � /
1 i \
S
I
r
z
)
i
i
v
Or
I
z
iS
4
�S,
D
2
i v�I
�
I
I
>
i
n
r
1 v
! n
I
T
STREET
(612) 587.5151
JWHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Stillings -Hoeft Addition
• It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned final plat be approved.
•
?- �F
/ (612) 587.5151
j CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 'WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
;JTCHINSON MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 2nd, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and
6ei`ty Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Final Plat
Stillings -Hoeft Addition
I hereby certify that the "Final Plat" of stillings -Hoeft Addition meets
the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per "Final Plat
Procedure ".
Marlon V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP /pv
i
•
q-l�,
RESOLUTION NO. 8311
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
. OF STILLINGS -HOEFT ADDITION
WHEREAS, Harlow Stillings, owner and subdivider of the property
proposed to be platted as Stillings -Hoeft Addition has submitted an
application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision
in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance
Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section
1, Township 116 North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of said
Northeast Quater of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 16.50 feet (1
rod) south of the northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said
Northeast Quarter of the Southwest quarter; thence northerly, along said
east line, to the southeast corner of TOWN AND COUNTRY ESTATES according
to the recorded plat thereof, said southeast corner being 544.50 feet
(33 rods) south of the northeast cornerof said Southwest Quarter; thence
. westerly, parallel with the north line of said Southwest quarter and
along the south line of said TOWN AND COUNTRY ESTATES, to the southwest
corner of said TOWN AND COUNTRY ESTATES; thence southerly, parallel with
said east line, to a point 16.50 feet south of the north line of said
southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter;
thence easterly, parallel with the last said north line, a distance of
330.00 feet to the point of beginning.
•
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said plat of STILLINGS -HOEFT ADDITIONS is hereby approved
and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws
of the State of Minnesota, subject to the parks and playground contribution
being met and appropriate subdivision agreement being drawn up.
RESOLUTION NO. 8311
PAGE 2
•
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the County Recorder for their use as required
by M.S.A. 462.358(3).
Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 1986.
ATTEST:
Paul . Ackland
Mayor
Gary D. Plotz •
City Administrator
r�
U
E
E
E 0) IS U
40 Gs 1.0 z.41
:66
p�BEL ST.
10
D 9 051
m n - -
b
m 21.12 °
so
CD �51
37 p b
N >tC q
v
(n
n.Of
�
m
7401
—
5°
90 C
90 Q
o
2700
60
-
°
m
AND
N
6G
J—'05 7cG
r52
a
90^
.7419
7411
U.Of
74.01
N
nm
)sal
)s of
1111
1111
1111
nw
0
S :GRAHAM
STREET
p
N
W
se
BCC __. 7�i N
\7511
750
8^ro
m
N
40 Gs 1.0 z.41
:66
p�BEL ST.
10
D 9 051
m n - -
b
m 21.12 °
so
CD �51
37 p b
N >tC q
6216
T4a9
)4p
n.Of
�
m
7401
—
5°
90 C
90 Q
Y
2700
60
-
STREET
N
6G
J—'05 7cG
r52
6166
90^
.7419
7411
U.Of
74.01
N
�l !
m 1 (O
-
o
0
W
a
p
N
BCC __. 7�i N
\7511
750
8^ro
N
o
4m
to A
w N
— e
f
rn
c`
—
3AI?#0
5'
A
tT 0)
_ V - m
c m
n
6216
T4a9
)4p
n.Of
TIOf
7401
C
UNT
Y
P 06°
CT
N
EST
TES
6166
74.09
.7419
7411
U.Of
74.01
1
3319
9 160 I o
w I
BM4
o p '� � N
I
9.30 .62 0 f
p m 1o W mn D7 ` -
m 129.54
Rq 16 1-0 7 r
CIRCLE s
N d f 634 R4 I
o °D
0 2
123
6C
A 6' 9sy3 O
961 W _0 �669P m
66 9a IV
63 1
LARSON
W C
D
C
m
_m
D
O
0
z
LAKE
Nu i;
I
C p
A
W
1
fC N
i
i�
1
1 � A
/V 1
tests
0
La..!
0
Lo 0 o"
b .2 o
0
0 j I r z z
i:.1 i :
North line of SE L44 at *E 1/4 of SWI/4
AN— -
137.00 so
- °330.00 --
N 89 °57'41'E
— �— — — - 133.00 — — — —j
r— t— N89-57,41-1- T
I
0
2 0
Dminoge and utility ealse"nis are shown thus,
I-,W* 3
0
W If
Af�
2�
7
PIAD
I
$09-54'33-W ---- T - -- --
1
- 330.00--
137.00
; a
BO
-133.00
OUTLOT A
--137.00
j
w
l
• 589.54.33- W
w
of
ok
'o
BLOCK I
0
p
I BLOCK 2
o0
Lo 0 o"
b .2 o
0
0 j I r z z
i:.1 i :
North line of SE L44 at *E 1/4 of SWI/4
AN— -
137.00 so
- °330.00 --
N 89 °57'41'E
— �— — — - 133.00 — — — —j
r— t— N89-57,41-1- T
I
0
2 0
Dminoge and utility ealse"nis are shown thus,
I-,W* 3
0
W If
Af�
r (612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Sketch Plan as submitted by Donald & Hazel Sitz
(wifhin f,,, mi a n.,R ual
The Planning Commission has no objection to the proposed Sketch
Plan.
g�'ocl
! siTC-
��
RECEIVED
;1,1986
j i 1 2 3 4 5
%F 175
/d
C�
QT K- NatTi/4- 00T// /17 FN Sot6� CAfrS F,eon7 v7r- kL�uL� cF
6
�JV
(612) 587.5151
WJ37 ITY OF H UTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
__ CHINSON, MINN, 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Taradiddle Acres E
June 17, 1986
s submitted to Count
within 2 mile
radius
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned final plat be approved.
•
! . 7p'
•
Is
u
"'iqe \�
O�
Z
N
N89.25'03-W
350.00 -
N 33
Y'
N i
o �
O '
3
N
o i
c
3�
�w
N1
nr
bi
0
N
I
3 3
SW corner of Sec 26
Cast iron monument
Drainage and utility eaeeTe
�M
Being 10 feet in Width and
the right of Way line and ex
o denotes 1/2 inch by 14 NC
Orientation of this Dearfn
33
_
in
N
N
m
tol
£ — __ 325. 00
I
325.00
h
n OU
�
_
so
N89 °25'03' W
O
Q
O
BLOCK
i
�
r
a
b
m
2
�
P
m
P
to
fD
2
Q
N
N
Q
t9
32 5. 00
N 89.25'03' W
rn
�
,y
N
N
'2
N
m
J
m
to
33
3
^n
n —
m0
Z
Lij
scale
325.00
35800
S89 °25'03 E
South line of SW 1/4 of Sec 26, T 117 N., R.30 W c�) D
r(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Northern View Acres as su
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the final plat as
presented.
•
I'UPpro1IMK1"1' uslys"UM7 an mnuuvw Miry
non N89.50 SWE 54
1080 48
66 1117...
e�' k4wi
;7' fo.yo.-R R spk, on we ' - .. �_= --- ��-2 _T- - �_ � ' _j — .. N �, � _ Q s I I r I _ �6 _ -j "7_— _. —I - - —' II I � , � j I 1 r II _ �I —i t __� � � � — . —� i I (i/! / / � � J _ . �� �_�� . � � ��f p \ �
two of transformer •p P
40-1 a
.' I b Eta, 80.42
r
1 00 "M 0
1 09 go"$ rep 1 00 acres
gg�"f 1,00 ac 0
0 3
2 t
A 334.66
1.043
220 2 2 207' 133 y.
-Wess"I IRtNE as% DRIVE -0,11% W. a 233.01
: �4p
Mw1I 0"1 NSB'20 E
we 0,
of 19-4
09?
46 200 Ise— '41 -0
0, Z
0 18)
IS
5. 53
1.01 acres 1— ."a acres 1 1 4: q I 2
16�371 6 4
so h jl� I r
1.14 acrap, 1.14 ecru J, I
IL
996f2
N89-50 5,
L jI II
L 4
OW Top of iron pip. (lot car)
W Elev -89.41
less
-Q
W in
4 > z
Fes 4 act*& B. M. Top of ran pipe (L'w` h 70 33
U)
El.v - 86. a I jb b
L
NS!)139'13'E J 41.,l
X --- [L--T
i I 1 1. 14 ac S Is W
-6 iT -896.20 00
Vo
IGMI HEROERT-55% 085) •-0.5% So.
11459-3913T
C' :.' n�—
' I I I , 4 I t
GRADE BLOCK 2 TO CIRCLED ELEVATIONi •
i lovilding "t-billiCk h"S
val 1"9 OW liters raw lot I.F•S
" too Uses
4 Well 00111 "Somw
It 1 J-� '�I. wl 1.1 I nt
I
I
LVt
tioc
•I
(612) 587 -5151
!lUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HU7CH/NSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Vacation of Easement as petitioned by Gary Miller
Pursuant to Section 5.962 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned petition to vacate an easement.
HISTORY
• On May 30, 1986, Gary Miller submitted a petition to vacate drainage and
utility easements on the north 6' of Lot 1 and the south 6' of Lot 2, Block
1 California Second Addition. A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Monday, June 16, 1986, at which time
there was no one present who stated their objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 5, 1986,
and on Tuesday, June 10, 1986.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned petition to vacate an easement be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
9 -•e,
,= ��C"
1056 5b"
� !�'-��
HUTCHINSON PMINUTES LANNING COMMISSION LOR•�'QU�
Monday, June 16, 1986 Ma%N
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Roland Ebent at 8:00 p.m.,
with the following members present: Spencer 8eytien, Shu -Mei Hwang,
Larry Romo, Marlin Torgerson, and Elsa Young. Members absent: Thomas
Lyke. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of
Engineering Marlow Priebe, City Attorney James Schaefer, Building Offi-
cial Homer Pittman and Fire Marshal George Field.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Hwang made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, May 20, 1986. Seconded by Mr. 8eytien, the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(A) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY GARY
MILLER
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3563 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thurday, June 5, 1986. The request is for a con itional use
permit to allow the moving of a house from 346 Hassan Street South
. to property located on California St.
Director Priebe asked Building Official Pittman if he had
discussed what was proposed to be done to the exterior. Director
Priebe further expressed his concern about exterior work being
completed in a timely manner. He recommended that a time limit
(possibly 6 months) be made a condition of this permit. Discus-
sion followed regarding a time limit requirement. It was
determined that putting a time limit on each application of this
kind might make the builder more aggressive in completing the
exterior remodeling, but would leave some flexibility (as oppossed
to an ordinance) to allow for considerations unique to each appli-
cation, such as, the size of the job, the time of year, etc. City
Attorney Schaefer expressed his concern about what the
consequences might be if the work was not completed when
indicated. Building Official Pittman explained that if work is
not ongoing 6 months after a building permit is issued, a new
permit must be obtained.
Mr. Beytien asked if the off - street parking would be put in when
the house is moved. Director Priebe responded that as this will
be a duplex, 4 off - street parking spaces are required. It could be
provided with a double garage and driveway or parking area in the
adjoining vacant lot. (When it is provided will depend upon where
and how it is going to be provided.)
• Mr. Ebent asked if the adjoining lot would remain vacant.
(b)
(c)
Director Priebe explained that there isn't enough square footage
in one lot due to the size of the house to be moved. It is going
to be used as a duplex and requires both lots. It is his
understanding that it will remain as green area or possibly for
parking.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the
hearing. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously
and the hearing was closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a
motion to recommend to City Council approval of the conditional
use permit as proposed with the stipulation that the exterior work
be done 6 months from the date the house is moved. Seconded by
Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS AS PETITIONED BY
GARY MILLER
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3564 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, June 5 and Tuesday, June 10, 1986. hem petition is
to vacate the drainage and utility easements on the north 6' of
Lot 1 and the South 6' of Lot 2, Block 1 Califoria Second
Addition.
Director Priebe explained that the utilities are in in the area
and no one has any specific use for the easements. Without the
vacation, the owner could have trouble selling the property,
financing it or refinancing. •
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed
at 8:17 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council
approval of the vacation as petitioned. Seconded by Mr. Hwang,
the motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "WOODRIDGE" AS SUBMITTED BY
PAT MIKULECKY AND KEVIN COMPTON
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:19 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3565 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, June 5, 1986. The proposed plat has nine lots and is
located west of Hilltop Addition.
Mr. Mikulecky was present to explain that the area is zoned R -2
and that 4 of the lots are 3/4 of an acre or larger, 2 are 10,000
square feet and the three others are slightly larger (than
10,000').
Mr. Melvin Ziemer, 845 Oak Street, stated that he owns property to
the south of Connecticut Street. It was his understanding that
the streets would all go straight through (Campbell Lane). I .
think it should run down to the tree line and utilize lots on the
lake. Mr. Ziemer then showed a future plan for the area to the
Commission and explained his idea. Discussion followed. There •
was discussion of a cul de sac. It was determined that a cul de
2
sac is limited to 500' so it would not be feasible.
Mr. Torgerson asked if there was any problem with proposed curve
is for snow removal. Director Preibe responded that there was not.
It was explained that the plan allows for building in the open
areas, leaving trees and lake area natural.
Mr. Don Heimerl, 410 Connecticut Street, was present to inquire
about how the development would be excavated. His concern was
having drainage from the new development going onto his property.
Director Priebe explained that the grading would be limited to the
property. Plan will take care of on site drainage by surface
drainage or tile line. There was further discussion of how the
drainage would be handled.
After discussion Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 8:35 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recom-
mend to City Council approval of the preliminary plat as
presented. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "PLAZA HEIGHTS" AS SUBMITTED
BY DENNIS ALBERTSON AND LARRY HERRMANN
Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:35 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3566 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
• Thursday, June 5, 1986. The proposed plat as 39 lof—sand is
located on the south side of South Grade Road.
Mr. Jerry Matheny was present representing the applicants.
Director Priebe explained that this property is zoned R -2 so the
development is planned for single family residences or duplexes.
It is laid out to take into consideration R -3 to the south of the
proposed plat. The proposal includes a 30' strip into neighboring
property for Chicago Avenue and a portion of Columbus Street.
Easements would have to be obtained from the property owner before
the final plat is considered. If the easement cannot be obtained,
the roadway would be adjusted to circumvent the adjoining
property.
Mr. Romo asked if Sunset Street is the only outlet. Director
Priebe responded that there are 3 or 4 platted outlets, but that
there is only one outlet onto South Grade Road. Ideally, he
stated, Keith and Steven Streets would be extended, but because of
the existing structure on the adjoining property it isn't possible
to do so. Property owners Linda Willmsen and Barbara Ringstrom
asked about having 6 driveways onto South Grade Road.
Administrator Plotz responded that he had also been concerned
about that but that the alternatives were limited.
• After further discussion, Mr. Romo made a motion to close
the hearing. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried
3
unanimously and the hearing was closed at 8:49 p.m. Mr. Romo made
a motion to recommend to City Council approval of the plat as
presented, with the understanding that before the final plat is
presented, the developer will be able to get and easement from the .
adjoing property owner or change the streets to be within
developer's property. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried
unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF A PORTION OF COLORADO STREET AS
PETITIONED BY TY HELLAND
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:50 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3568 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, June 5 and Tuesday, June 10, 1986. The petition is
to vacate Colorado Street from the center of Eighth Avenue to 340'
south.
Mr. Hel land was present to explain that a cul de sac coming off
either Eighth Avenue and Colorado Street or Colorado Street and
the future Caroline Avenue have been proposed. He's making the
request because he does not want the street to become a heavily
travelled area. He stated that he feels the main traffic to the
Golf Course should be on Eighth Avenue. He noted as Colorado
Street is not in yet, most people will get used to using Eighth
Avenue and would not miss Colorado not being a through Street.
Mr. Torgerson stated that he contacted the utilities company
regarding the vacation and they stated they were opposed to it.
They plan to run utilities there. Mr. Torgerson also stated that •
by approving the vacation, Helland's Seventh Addition would be in
direct violation of Subdivision Ordinance 1466 Section 5.213 that
states "Closed subdivisions (with one exit) shall not be
permitted."
Mr. Hel land responded that that could be just temporary depending
upon the Bethke Development and other development in the area.
Fire Marshall Field suggested running Colarado parallel with Shady
Ridge Road. He futher stated that from the public safety point of
view, stopping and starting a street creates some real problems
for ambulance and fire trucks.
Mr. Ward Haugen, representing the Country Club, stated that they
are opposed to the vacation as they expect Colorado Street to
become the main entrance to the Golf Course.
Mr. Pat Spaude, 1255 7th Ave. NW, stated that he and 7 -10 other
residents in his area are in favor of the vacation because of the
traffic factor. He stated that there are many small children in
the area who would benefit from the vacation.
Mr. Ebent stated that most of those property owners should have
been aware of the fact that Colorado Street was a platted Street
when they bought their property in the area. Discussion followed •
regarding the cul de sacs proposed and how the vacation would
4
affect Helland's Seventh Addition. Mr. Hwang stated that Dr.
Lyke, representing the utilities commission, expressed their
objection to the vacation. Mr. Beytien commented that you have to
. go along with the regulations. Mr. Romo commented that he could
like to see the vacation, but the problems it would create for
emergency vehicles must be the first consideration.
Mr. Hel land stated that he would eliminate one of the lots shown
and have a 6 to 10' public lane for golf carts.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the
hearing. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion carried unanimously and
the hearing was closed at 9:15 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion
to reject the petition to vacate as it would cause Helland's
Seventh addition to be in direct violation of Ordinance 15.213 and
on the recommendation of the Utilities Commission. Seconded by Mr.
Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
5. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF STILLINGS -HOEFT ADDITION
Director Priebe explained that the final plat meets all the
requirements of the ordinance. There was a small change made in
• Outlot A. The subdivision agreement has been submitted and the
developer is aware of the parks and playground contribution.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the Final Plat as presented. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN AS SUBMITTED BY DONALD SITZ TO COUNTY
(within two mile radius)
Donald and Hazel Sitz were present to explain their request. Ms.
Sitz distributed some drawings showing the area in relation to
Bradford Street and Sherwood Street. She also showed an aerial
view of the property. It was noted that this area is across from
Prairie View Acres on County Road 29.
Mr. Ebent noted that staff had recommended that for the
preliminary plat the layout be adjusted to show lots abutting a
street that connects to the County Road at a 90 degree angle and
that shows a complete layout of the property for future planning.
Administrator Plotz stated that at the staff meeting, which
consisted of Marlow Priebe, James Marka and himself, he had no
strong feelings against the lots being parallel with County Road
89. His concern is with how the development will tie someday to
the development to the north. He feels that for long range
• planning an over all plan of how the land might be developed is a
reasonable request. Since the meeting, Administrator Plotz stated
that he has seen 4 additional layouts and alternatives.
Director Priebe stated that this is the 2nd development in this
general area, and the property to the northeast had a sketch plan .
that covers entire property. We are looking at what future
streets could be between Century Ave and platted area. He also
noted that the "ring road" abuts this property on the north. He
stated that the City tries to have property owners give a layout
of entire property to see that what we are looking at has some
kind of plan. Beyond the developers property, he continued, it is
the City's responsiblity to see what could happen. He stated that
the whole area does not have to be platted, but that he would like
to see an overall plan for the property.
There was discussion of the County's requirement to plat in one
acre lots. Director Priebe responded that the lots would have to
conform to the County's requirements for the preliminary plat, but
that the overall layout would show how it might be laid out in the
event that it would someday come into the city. He feels this is
a plus for the developer and a plus for the person buying the
property.
Ms. Sitz stated that their question is why must they plat the
whole farm when they intend to develop only 6 - 12 lots. Mr.
Priebe responded that he is not asking them to plat the whole
farm but to provide an overall layout for future planning, at the
preliminary plat stage.
Mrs. Young stated that she doesn't recall (for Taradiddle Acres) •
asking anything about joining up any streets. Director Priebe
responded that in the previous two requests, they platted all of
their land.
Mr. Sitz explained that they intend to plat only 6 lots. If the
County requires an access road, they will plat 12. They have no
plans beyond that.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to state that the
Planning Commission has no objection to the Sketch Plan. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF TARADIDDLE ACRES AS SUBMITTED TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS)
Director Priebe stated the subdivision agreement had been
submitted and that there were no changes from the preliminary plat
as previously approved. Mr. Hwang made a motion to recommend to
City Council approval of the final plat as presented. Seconded by
Mr. Rom , the motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF NORTHERN VIEW ACRES AS SUBMITTED TO
COUNTY (WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS)
Director Priebe stated that the subdivision agreement has been .
submitted and there are no changes other than street names on the
•
\J
•
final plat. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the final Plat as presented. Seconded by Mrs.
Young, the motion carried unanimously.
(e) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 7.09 F YARD
SPACE ENCROACHMENTS
Building Official Homer Pittman was present to explained the
proposed amendment to Section 7.09. He stated that the way the
ordinance now reads decks can only extend 6' into yards. In order
for a deck to be functional, it needs to be wider than 6'. There
was discussion of the term "yards" as stated in the ordinance.
The Commission asked Attorney Schaefer to come up with language
that would clarify what is meant by "front, rear or exterior side
yard adjoing a street lot line." Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
set a public hearing on the proposed amendment for July 15, 1986,
at the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Seconded
by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously.
(f) DISCUSSION OF RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM OPTION
Director Priebe explained that the article in the packet was from
the Owatonna newspaper about a voluntary rental registration
program. He suggested that the Planning Commission get further
information about such a program and whether or not it is working.
After discussion, Mr. Hwang stated that he would like to see the
direction on whether or not to pursue studying the rental
registration question come from the City Council.
(g) DISCUSSION OF COMBINING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT PROCESS
Administrator Plotz stated that the City Council would like the
Planning Commission to consider streamlining the platting process
by combining the preliminary and final plat. Discussion followed.
It was the consensus of the Commission to have City Attorney
Schaefer research the possibility. It was noted that the
ordinance could possibly allow an option depending upon number of
lots to be platted, etc.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mr. Beytien made a motion to adjourn
the meeting. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously and
the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
'P"JS0N, PANN. 552-50
M E M O
DATE: June 23, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Police Station Site
We have completed our preliminary work for a Boundary Survey of the above -
referenced site. The data found is very conflicting. A survey could
present a problem with the two property owners on each side of the site.
I recommend Pellinen Land Surveying be contacted to make an independent
survey.
We will complete a topographic survey and utilities drawing based on the
. Boundary Survey.
MVP /pv
•
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
i
/J—jr-
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
• WATER 4 SEWER FUND
*U.S.Postmaster
Richard Nagy
Merle Meece
Donald Schultz
Braun Engineering Testing
Flexible Pipe Tool Co.
State Treasurer '
Feed Rite Controls
Logis
LTP Enterprises
Mn. Valley Testing Lab.
Viking Safety Products
Water Products Co.
Zep Mfg. Co.
Central Mn. Com.
Primrose Oil Co.
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
Schmeling 011 Co.
Share Corp.
Primrose Oil Co.
GENERAL FUND
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Hutchinson Telephone Co.
*Mn. Twins
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Dept. of Natural Resources
*Sears Tower
*Chicago IS
*Chicago Botanic Gardens
*Chicago Botanic Gardens
*Field Nuseum of Natural History
*Bismarck Hotel
*Bismarck Hotel
John Herbert
Mark Luhmann
Karen McKay
Greg Amundson
Chris Gordon
Wm. Christenson
Barbara Dahlmann
JUNE 24, 1986
postage for water bills
safety boots
safety glasses
refund water meter payment
professional fees
hose guide
certificate renewal fee
supplies chemicals
computer charges
repairs
testing
rain pants €, jacket
parts
gloves
repairs
oil
oil
degreaser
oil
boat registration fee
boat registration fee
boat registration fee
boat registration fee
snowmobile reg. fee
boat registration fee
phone service
114 tickets
recreation veh.reg. fee
boat registration fee
43 tickets -sr. citizens
43 tickets -sr. citizens
43 tickets -sr. citizens
parking fee
43 tickets -sr. citizens
45 tickets -sr. citizens
room reservations- sr.citizens
refund
refund
mail box $ post
refund
basketball refund
baseball refund
swimming refund
$156.52
30.00
77.00
70.00
2675.40
152.15
` 15.00
826.96
1128.14
234.50
50.00
102.65
52.67
42.13
152.10
98.20
$ 5863.42
$199.12
59.68
122.69
$381.49
$ 5.00
24.00
124.00
89.00
4.00
39.00
3216.71
408.00
18.00
90.00
96.75
79.00
60.00
5.00
47.00
405.00
3237.27
73.00
65.00
20.42
12.00
5.00
12.00
20.00
11-a,
-2-
swimming refund
Jean Borstad
basketball refund
Ross Hotovec
.
Susan Hutchins
swimming refund
Frank Mack
supplies for playground
Tamie Moehring
basketball refund
Danny Peters
basketball refund
Ryan Redetzke
Twins game refund
Betty Ruskamp
basketball refund
Scott Streich
basketball refund
Dan Thalmann
entry fee overpayment
Jerald Zaske
safety glasses
Mary Haugen
mileage
Marie Thurn
lifeguard training
American Red Cross
part
BNT Implement
solar salt
Brunner Sales
equipment payment
Chase Manhattan Corp.
piano tuning
Christensen Piano Service
disposable lungs
Emergency Med. Products
clear lense
Fisco
tree removal
Harvey Kemper
rock
Hansen Gravel
registration fee
IACP
part
Kaitlin Corp.
utility rake
Lisco Mfg.
renew license plates
Motor vehicle dept.
housing reservation
Nashville Housing Bureau
Mandel $ Associates
benefits study fee
Hutch Bus Lines
bus rental
Lifesign Design
name strips
Walking Billboards
t- shirts
Tom Geier
safety shoes
Acme Car Wash
car wash tokens
American Risk Services
insurance consulting
Brinkman Studio
photo finish
Bullseye Reloading
reloads
Browns Greenhouse
plants
Bennett Office Supplies
toner
Ben Franklin Store
supplies
Coast to Coast
supplies
Chamber of Commerce
message pads
Carneys
supplies
Co. Treasurer
dl fees
Communication Auditors
repairs
Dept. of Public Safety
CJDN connect charge
Erizkson Oil Products
film
Great Plains
supplies
Govt Bus. Systems
forms
Hager Jewelry'
supplies
Hutch Com. Hospital
laundry
Hutch Schwinn Cyclery,
bike repair
Ideal Shoe Shop.__
net repair"
Jahnkes Red Owl
supplies
Jerabek Machine Shop
supplies
Johnsons Super Value
supplies
K Mart
supplies
Kohesh
swimming refund
12.00
basketball refund
5.00
baseball refund
12.00
swimming refund
10.00
supplies for playground
10.16
basketball refund
5.00
basketball refund
5.00
Twins game refund
3.00
basketball refund
5.00
basketball refund
'` 5.00
entry fee overpayment
15.00
safety glasses
80.00
mileage
21.32
lifeguard training
5.40
part
64.95
solar salt
69.12
equipment payment
25,396.10
piano tuning
40.00
disposable lungs
98.65
clear lense
37.48
tree removal
725.00
rock
120.00
registration fee
150.00
part
138.75
utility rake
67.09
renew license plates
30.00
housing reservation
70.00
benefits study fee
655.00
bus rental
175.00
name strips
16.00
t- shirts
2039.14
safety shoes
21.97
car wash tokens
50.00
insurance consulting
2400.00
photo finish
4.40
reloads
122.00
plants
10.27
toner
18.00
supplies
5.53
supplies
7.75
message pads
3.84
supplies
25.14
dl fees
177.00
repairs
124.99
CJDN connect charge
150.00
film
38.00
supplies
2105.47
forms
44.07'
supplies
17.14
laundry
14.85
bike repair
44.57
net repair"
30.00
supplies
20.73
supplies
13.08
supplies
65.49
supplies
2.94
equipment
838.15
-3-
0
L & P Supply
repairs $ supplies .
51.41
League of Mn. Cities
surveys $ subscriptions
218.75
LOgis
computer charges
10,092.25
Mankato Bus Products
meter contract
35.00
UPS
registration fees
42.00
Mn. Sports Federation
softballs
342.65
Kenneth B. Merrill
League Conference
92.79
Midwest Bus. Products
stapler
41.62
MARILYN Swanson
coffee
f 9.95
McGarvey Coffee
coffee
51.90
Northwestern Bell
leased phone line
325.81
New Ulm Wholesale
cups
50.00
Homer Pittman
League conferen de
79.13
Peterson Bus Service
bus rental
156.00
Pitney Bowes Credit,Corp.
equipment rental
102.00
Sears
replacement equipment
52.09
James Schaefer
i june
1001.00 -
Town $ Country Tire
parts
6.50
Gopher Sign Co.
signs
421.80
Hutch Utilities
fixtures
691.10
Schlueters REfrigeration
repairs
37.50
Tom Geier
safety shoes
21.97
Jim Hatch Sales Co,
boot
377.26
National Airport Equipment
12 lamps
46.20
Rickeman Seed Center
seed
215.00
$ 57,258.37
0
0 -4-
Bonds of 1986
TKDA
Library Const. Fund
Highsmith Co. Inc.
Krasen Plbr $ Htg.
Pool $ Recreation Const. Fund
Mn. Playground Inc.
Sports Technology
Fire Hall Const. Fund
Anderson Interiors
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
Griggs Cooper Co.
Ed Phillips & Sons
to
pre -study Co. Ditch #18 2310.00
cassettes(Westlund donation) - 110.10
final estimate 6000.00
ring buoy 57.20
36 kick boards 249.31
supplies 133.89
wine $ liquor 2289.67
wine $ liquor 3452.58
5742.25
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON CHARTER COMMISSION
Wednesday, June 4, 1986
. 1. CALL TO ORDER
FOR YOUR INFORMATION,
Acting Chairman Harold Juul called the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m.
with the following members present: Walt Clay, Tom Dolder, Phil Graves,
Jean Peterson, Dick Popp, Delores Saar, June Wick, and Acting Chairman
Juul. Members absent: Chuck Carlson, Jeff Haag, Dale McLain and Kay
Peterson. Also present: City Administrator Gary Plotz.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Clay made a motion to accept the minutes dated Wednesday, May 21,
1986, as written. Seconded by Mr. Graves, the motion carried
unanimously.
3. PRESENTATION BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz began by pointing out that at present his job
description states that he has supervisory authority over all
departments with the exception of the police department and volunteer
fire department; however, Ordinance No. 599, amending Section 200 of the
1974 Ordinance Code of the City deletes the section exluding the police
department and fire department. He feels, however, that he has very
little authority over the police and fire departments. He finds little
need for authority over the fire department, as there have been no
• problems.
Administrator Plotz stated that the City Charter does not address who
is in charge of the City. Many City departments are not mentioned in
the Charter. Whatever it is called (city manager or city administra-
tor), he feels there has to be a chief administrative officer that the
department heads report to, and it should be clearly defined in the
Charter, rather than 'by resolution. The department heads should be
responsible to the chief official. One of the main things the Council
wants is to make the department heads accountable.
Administrator Plotz noted that the city of Montevideo has a City Manager
form of government that is functioning very well, noting that the size
of a City does not necessarily dictate what form of government it should
have.
Administrator Plotz then provided several handouts which he proceeded to
go through, highlighting the items he felt pertained to the role of the
City Administrator and how other cities have specified the duties in
their City Charters.
Looking at Handout 11, "Sample Charter Provisions Establishing the
Position of City Manager or Administrator and Prescribing the Powers and
Duties of the Position ", pg. "22 ", Subdivision 1, (portion of Winona
City Charter) Administrator Plotz pointed out that Winona's charter
leaves no question about the city manager's authority to remove and ap-
point department heads by virtue of State Statute. He stated he feels
1
this should be in the Charter. He also stated that the City
Administrator should be accountable in that if the organization is not
operating efficiently, the City Council would have the opportunity to
dismiss him. In the classical approach to city manager, there is no
exception to appointment and dismissal power -- it is not subject to
subsequent action of the city council.
Continuing with Subdivision 7, p. 23, Administrator Plotz explained
that this is the same as a policy handbook which the city council is in
the process of adopting, which details 85 City policies on various
topics ranging from agenda deadlines to refuse policy.
Continuing with City of Morris, pg. "22 ", Section 6.02, Administrator
Plotz stated that there should be a general statement at the beginning
that there is a chief administative officer, and that Subdivision 1
does that. Subdivision 2 is a common inclusion and Subdivision 3 is a
reasonable statement. Note that Morris makes appointment and removal of
department heads final only by majority vote of the council.
Mr. Clay asked if Administrator Plotz sees himself as having authority
over the city attorney. Mr. Plotz responded that it could be done
either way. His relationship with the city attorney is different be-
cause the city attorney is a part time person. His job description is
adopted and changed each year. He is on contract and the city does not
follow the same procedure for someone on contract. He noted that it
seems to be a common exception (See subd. 3).
Continuing with Section 2.09, Interference with Administration. (p.
"5 "), Administrator Plotz stated that including this section is quite •
common. It basically prevents department heads from going directly to
the council or the council from giving orders, publicly or privately.
There is a similar provision in Blaine's charter, pg. "3 ".
Administrator Plotz pointed out on pg. "14" of the Blaine Charter,
Section 6.01 provides for a hearing for the City Manager if removed
during his first year. In continuing to point out "common threads"
between these City's Charters, Administrator Plotz noted Subd. 8 p. "15"
provides for policy handbook.
On Page "6" of Columbia Heights' Charter, Section 11 includes the "one -
year removal" clause. Administrator Plotz further pointed out items B,
C and G in Section 53, page "15 ".
Continuing with the clipping from Faribault newspaper, note Section
2.09.
Continuing with Northfield revised City Charter, Administrator Plotz
pointed out that the Mayor has the sole power to appoint the City
Administrator, subject to Council vote. On the next page of the hand-
out, ordinance No. 345 amending Northfield Charter, Administrator Plotz
pointed out Subdivision 5, stating that this is a very important provi-
sion - not necessarily the language used, but including the development,
implementation and monitoring of as a duty of the City Administrator.
Administrator Plotz stated that the example from the City of Jordan is 0
2
the poorest example of a description of the City Administrator that is
included, as it doesn't give much.
Looking at Handout #2, "Charter of the City of Faribault,' pg. 2,
Section 2.01, Administrator Plotz pointed out the use of term "Council -
Administrator" as form of city government. He also noted that this
charter includes Section 2.09, Interference with administration.
Administrator Plotz also stated that he likes the format of this
charter, pointing out on page 10, Section 6.02, the summaries given in
italics. He further noted Subdivisions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, and Editor's
note Subd. 4. This charter refers to State Statute Optional Plan B,
from which this section is patterned.
Mr. Clay asked what the difference is between a City Manager and City
Adminstrator. Administrator Plotz responded that under State Statute
there is no question on the power of the City Manager to run the
organization and to hire and fire. Under a City Administrator plan,
they start putting in exceptions.
Going to Section 7.05, pg. 13 of the Faribault Charter, Administrator
Plotz stated that this forces long range planning -- a part of planning
that should be in it (the charter).
Looking at Handout #3, "Adopted Rules of the Faribault Police Civil
Service Commission, Administrator Plotz noted that there are references
to the city administrator. Section 5.6, page 13, gives appointment
authority to the city administrator. He finds this a real attempt to
work with the city administrator under civil service rules. In the
Hutchinson Civil Service Commission Rules there is no mention of the
City Administrator. Going to page 17, Administrator Plotz pointed out
the city administrator authority in in- service promotions. The Fari-
bault Civil Service Commission is under same rules as provided under
Statute 419. Page 23, Section 9.1 gives the administrator authority to
discipline.
In regard to the Hutchinson Civil Service Commission, Administrator
Plotz stated that he does not see it as an all encompassing board. The
City Council still has authority over them. He stated he thinks it
would be good to get the City Administrator on the Civil Service Commis-
sion; however, State law prohibits any City employee from serving on the
commision, and in an opinion from the City Attorney, Handout 15, he
further states that the City Administrator cannot be an exofficio member
either.
There was discussion of appointments and term length. City Administra-
tor Plotz explained that the City Council is in the process of adopting
a policy of not allowing more than 8 years or two terms for any Board or
Commission. Hospital, Burns Manor and Utilties would be exempt.
Looking at Handout #4, "Cities over 10,000 population in which police
chief is appointed by city manager and also cities in whcih he is
appointed by commission, council, etc.," Administrator Plotz pointed out
that there are 143 cities where the police chief is appointed by the
City Manager. In Minnesota cities under the City Manager Plan, 3
. appoint Police Chief. Mr. Graves asked if these cities have the civil
3
service commission in place. Administrator Plotz responded that he
doesn't know but will find out and report back to the Charter
Commission.
Continuing on the last page of handout 14, Administrator Plotz pointed
out paragraph 2, circled, stating that this supports the unity argument
for having a chief adminstrative officer in charge of appointments and
removal, etc.
Handout #5 is Legal Opinion from City Attorney James Schaefer.
Looking at Handout #6, City of Litchfield Ordinance No. 418,
Administrator Plotz explained that Litchfield hired a consultant in 1979
to come up with a description of their City Administrator. He feels
that as in Article IV, #2, it is good to have goals and objectives
included - that the planning idea is important. He likes the wording in
#3 because it more acurately describes how it works in Hutchinson.
Mr. Popp asked Administrator Plotz about his reference to using the term
"Safety Service Officer" for Police Chief. Discussion followed
regarding that person's authority over the fire department.
Jean Peterson asked for Mr. Plotz' opinion about having the city admini-
strator rather than Mayor being recognized by the Governor in the case
of a city emergency. Administrator Plotz stated that he has no strong
feeling about that. In discussion it was brought up that a community
might "rally around" an elected official more readily in an emergency.
Mr. Juul stated that in Bloomington they have a merit board consisting
of 3 members that does all the deciding on merit raise recommendation to
the City Administrator. Administrator Plotz responded that merit
increases go along with personnel review. He explained the current City
procedure.
OLD BUSINESS
Jean Peterson presented suggested wording for Section 3.08. After
discussion it was the concensus of the commission to change "4/5" to
"majority" and to accept the proposed wording as follows:
Section 3.08. SIGNING AND PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS.
Every ordinance or resolution passed by the council shall be signed by
the mayor or by two other members, attested by the City E4erk Admini-
strator, and filed and preserved by him. Every ordinance shall be
published at least once in the official newspaper. In the case of
lemon tthhy ordinances, or ordinances which include charts or maps, if the
Council determines that publication of the title and a summary of the
ordinance would clearly inform the up blic of the intent and effect of
The ordinance, the Council m P1 a majority vote direct that only the
title and a summary be published, with notice that a rip •nted copy of the
entire text of the ordinance is available for inspection at the office
of the City Administrator and any other up blic location which the
Ceuncil designates. Prior to publication, the Counci s� hall approve the
it f1e and text of the summary for accuracy and clarity. To the extent
and in the manner provided �L law an ordinance may incorporate �L refer-
.
ence a statute, state administrative rule or regulation of Minnesota, a
code or ordinance or part thereof without pubishing the material
referrer to in fu
5. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mr. Graves made a motion to adjourn the
meeting. Seconded by Mr. Clay, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m
•
U
•
(612) 587•SlSl l
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
June 13, 1986
Mr. J. Lucachick
widseth, Smith, Nolting & Associates, Inc.
P. O. Box 963
2504 Aga Drive
Alexandria, MN 56308
RE: Greencastle Project
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dear Jim:
Fp�`rp4)
/�F�11 "11 4T/
lot
Enclosed is a copy of the 8 1/2" x 11" Sketch Plan Mr. Newell Weed presented
to the City Council on June 10th. He indicated the parking in the northwest
corner of the site is what is being proposed to be built.
As of this date, no such site drawing scale 1 " =30' has been submitted to the
City for approval.
Kindly provide us with 4 copies of same, as we need this information to
determine what will be approved for construction. Councilman Pat Mikulecky
and I are working on this matter.
MVP /pv
enc.
cc: Mayor and City Council
Councilman Pat Mikulecky
Newell Weed
Homer Pittman, Bldg. Official
Sincerely,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
Freemont Avenue
►oel
E— \_o �
Ir
z
ra
'! I
•ea
' VIr .
•7C •1` r
+ 1 �13>
so
__ Y ..r ,o
•!a I •p: � ^is
Co
� C
. T i� Y
•ic
P� L�
F .I
ti
I, e
ai ^.. X,
Century Avenue
C
•
•
Class H 50.86
Class I 52.47
Class J 54.97
Class K 60.24
1
Mav s Geier, A inistrator
BURNS MANOR
_
4 .
MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME
North High Drive
,Q
e
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Phone 587 -4919 =
(612)
May 27, 1986
(�e—eizqozw FOR YOUR INFORMATIO
The State of Minnesota
has released the new Case Mix
rates effective
July 1, 1986.
Case
Mix
New Rates
Class
A
32.37
Class
B
35.05
Class
C
38.09
•
Class
D
40.86
Class
E
43.72
Class
f
43.89
Class
G
46.31
Class H 50.86
Class I 52.47
Class J 54.97
Class K 60.24
1
Mav s Geier, A inistrator
0
0
Ll
Cathy Nevanen, Editor
HUTCHINSON LEADER
36 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Ms. Nevanens
1711 West Marie Street
Pasco, WA 99301
June 21, 1986
JUN 19W
RECFJVED
BYE —`�
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
During our recent trip to your city to visit our family, we
were pleasantly surprised to find that your community had
taken the step to improve the Carnegie Public Library by
overwhelmingly approving a bond issue. Having spent two
years renovating our own Carnegie Library into a historical
museum, we readily recognize the demands to be fulfilled
to maintain historical standards. Your interior resto-
ration is appropriate and beautiful. Bravo for these
efforts!
Walking through your facilities in search of books is now
a pleasure. In 1982, we visited the library and remembered
the enormous numbers of books without shelf space. Visiting
the facilities with our grandchildren is now a pleasure.
Your library board has given fine leadership in this under-
taking and as frequent visitors to the community we wish
to congratulate your efforts on this most worthwhile
project.
cot vutchinson City Council
Hutchinson Library Board
You
y,
Russell-A. Wiseman
•
ri
LI
(612) 587 -5151
CITY Of HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 23, 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland and
Members of the City Council
22 23 24,?
,JP""
�'�CEIVm
8Y.
ME
VOR YOUR MORMON
RE: MC KIMM MILK TRANSIT, INC. - Waste Hauling Agreement and
Lease
Dear Mayor Ackland:
On this date I have received a copy of the following
documents:
1) Waste Hauling and Disposal Agreement;
2) Vehicle Lease and Service Agreement.
These documents are in response to previous
communications had with Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing and
McKimm Trucking concerning their waste hauling agreement. I
have forwarded a copy of these documents to Mr. Lee LaBore,
attorney for Junker Sanitation, for his inspection and
comments. When I have had an opportunity to discuss this
matter with Mr. LaBore and the various participants, I will
render an opinion concerning the documents and their
compliance with Hutchinson Ordinances.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/ " v�
� f
James H.
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
JAMES H. SCHAEFER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
103 lad A. S. F.
P. O. B.. 383
HUTCHINSON, MN 393SO -0363
1 -812 -687 -7700
June 23, 1986 FILE C0^y
Lee LaBore
Suite 203 - Northwestern Bank Bldg.
1011 First South
Hopkins, MN 55343
RE: MC RIMM MILK TRANSIT$ INC. - Waste Hauling Agreement
Dear Lee:
Enclosed please find copies of the following
documents:
1) Waster Hauling and Disposal Agreement; and
2) Vehicle Lease and Service Agreement.
Please review these documents and provide me with your
thoughts concerning their compliance or lack thereof with the
Hutchinson Ordinance and the contract agreement between the
City of Hutchinson and Junker Sanitation. I would appreciate
your comments at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosures
FIRSTATE
orFEDER,,�LL
Savings & Loan ASSOClation
June 10, 1986
The City of Hutchinson
City Hall
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Gentlemen:
"THANKS" TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON.
227 Maln Street5outh, HUtChinson, MN 55350.0309
Telephone (612) 587 -2000
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
r
n JUN
By � �cC7
I would like to thank the Mayor, the City Council, City Administrator,
Police Department, and all City Departments for their cooperation during
the construction of our new building, and for permitting the use of
the city parking lot at Second Avenue and Hassan Street during the
• construction period.
Constructing a large building in a confined area, at a busy intersection,
is indeed a task. The cooperation shown us during construction helped
us to complete the building as rapidly and safely as possible.
We are pleased to have made this investment in downtown Hutchinson, and
we hope Hutchinson residents will enjoy this addition to our business
community.
John TerWisscha, our General Contractor and President of TerWisscha Con-
struction, joins me in thanking you again for your cooperation, kindness
and courtesies during the past nine months.
Stop in and look us over.
Cordially,
Donald A. Glas
Pre dent
ah
0
First federally Chartered savings and loan association in the State
f
Y
p • �� C'�:�Q �pR Yp�R �NF
u
0
5° 4 , %?;
l
L J
June 20, 1986
JURY 198
RECD
BY
vt68L9
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Mr. Plotz:
FOR YOUR INFORMATIOr`
Your community's wastewater treatment project has a potential for funding in
Fiscal Year (FY) 1987. However, unless the Federal Government reauthorizes
the Clean Water Act and appropriates sufficient funds, there is no
possibility of funding your project. So far in FY 1986, Congress had
appropriated only one - fourth of the authorized amount and the remainder is
being withheld in reserve pending Congressional reauthorization of the Clean
41 Water Act.
Congress has not been able to come to agreement regarding the Clean Water
Act reauthorization. The following is a summary of the major positions:
- The Senate Bill (S -1128) would reauthorize the Construction Grants
Program through 1994 with a reduced allocation to the State of
Minnesota.
- The House Bill (HR 8) would provide $21 billion nationally for
Construction Grants through 1994 with no change in the allocation
formula to Minnesota.
- The Administration's proposal would phaseout the Construction
Grants Program over the next four years with funding going to only
those projects which are currently being constructed. This would
mean no "new start" projects like your own.
Obviously, the House Bill provides the greatest resources to Minnesota, but
even more important, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is very
concerned that further delays in reauthorizing the Clean Water Act will
hinder many communities from meeting the mandatory July 1, 1988 deadline for
communities being in compliance with their water quality standards. The
more quickly Congress reauthorizes the Clean Water Act, the sooner Minnesota
will have funds to continue the program and fund potential projects as your
• community's.
Phone: 612 - 296 -7195
1935 West County Road 82, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 -2785
Regional Offices • Duluth /Brainerd /Detroit Lakes /Marshall /Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
Page 2
The MPCA strongly urges you to contact your Congressman and Senators to
voice your concerns for your community and urge them to reauthorize the
Clean Water Act as quickly as possible. Senator Durenberger is on the
Senate Committee concerning the Clean Water Act Reauthorization.
Representative Arlan Stangeland and Representative James L. Oberstar are on
the House Committee concerning reauthorization of the Clean Water Act. You
are encouraged to contact these Congressional committee members, as well as
Senator Boschwitz and your Congressional District Representative by calling
or sending mailgrams and letters using the following address styles:
The Honorable
(District Representative)
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Telephone: (202) 224 -3121
The Honorable
(District Representative)
United States House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Telephone: (202) 224 -3121
If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Lea. - r�-C-Q)J
Linda D. Prail
Grants Project Manager
Division of Water Quality
LDP:nmf
r]
L
• Board of Directors Meeting
June 5, 1986
7:00 a.m.
Chamber of Commerce
M I N U T E S
Members Present:
Ron McGraw, Chairman
Glenn Matejka
Tom Daggett
Buzz Burich
Donald Glas
v,l
1� xz�
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Others Present:
Gary Blythe, Chamber Vice President
John Bernhagen, Executive Director
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 a.m. by Chairman McGraw.
Glas moved and Matejka seconded to approve the minutes of the May 1,
1936, meeting. Carried.
The treasurer's report was accepted as reported.
Bernhagen reported on the activities of the Financial Committee. (see
the Financial Committee minutes of June 3, 1986)
Bernhagen also reported on the Targeted Marketing effort. Of the
14 letters sent, 5 contacts have been made to date. One of these
indicated they would like a call back in late fall when they would
have a better determination regarding plant expansion.
The questionnaires sent to the businesses of Industrial Park East
showed five in favor of erecting a common sign, five said no and three
gave no response. After some discussion, it was suggested that we
look at erecting a sign that identified the industrial park and the
availability of sites with the telephone number of HCDC for further
information. A follow up report will be given on this after inquiring
with the Sites and Building Committee.
No action was taken on the venture capital resolution because several
changes were suggested. A new draft will be brought before the
next Board meeting.
Gary Blythe, of the Chamber, has suggested that we may want to use
their newsletter as a vehicle for our newsletter, "What's Developing ".
For a cost similar to our limited mailing of our newsletter at this
time, it would give us an exposure of around 400 versus our approximate
• 40 now. The Board felt we should just go ahead and work it out with
the Chamber.
Board of Directors Meeting
June 5, 1986
page 2
Ron McGraw gave a brief report on the connector track construction.
He also indicated that the passenger tourist attraction for the
railroad is nearly in place.
There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 a.m.
There will be no July meeting. The next regular Board Meeting will
be August 7, 1986.
r
u
r
E
•
Minnesota
CMC^� dUN 1988
M RECO•-
T
Coalition of Outstate Cities ��`29zszr /Z�
June 6, 1986 ;1" _
Mayor Paul Ackland v
City Hall �f
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland:
The Coalition of Outstate Cities met on May 29th during
our successful legislative conference at Maddens. The conference
was attended by over 75 city officials and legislators. At this
meeting we evaluated last year's legislative efforts and
considered a legislative program for 1987.
it is clear that the Coalition has benefited greatly
from its past legislative efforts. There was a consensus among the
city officials present at the legislative conference that it is
essential that the Coalition have an effective legislative program
in 1987. The Coalition has an uphill battle in 1987. Some of the
proposals being suggested by the Governor and gubernatorial
candidates such as full state funding for education could have
devastating property tax impacts on Coalition cities. For
example, if the funding for Local Government Aid were eliminated
and shifted to provide a reduction in the school levy, property
tax rates in suburban metropolitan cities would go down by an
average of 5 mills, and in outstate cities they would rise by an
average of 10 mills. The impact on many Coalition cities would be
substantially greater than a 10 mill increase.
After considerable discussion, the Coalition unanimously
approved the following actions to implement the Coalition's
legislative program for 1987:
1. Adopted positions on property tax reform, Local
Government Aid and urban growth management for the 1987
legislative session.
2. Authorized the Coalition's officers to negotiate
and execute a contract with Briggs and Morgan for .
legislative services for the 1987 session.
3. Reappointed Mayor Earl Laufenourger from Winona as
the Chairman of the Coalition's legislative
committee. Membership of the committee will be
expanded somewhat and all Coalition members will
be notified of its meetings.
4. Authorized an assessment of member
per capita to fund the Coalition's
coordination and other support for
1987 legislative activities. These
be paid in full or in installments
April 1 of 1987. This will permit
spread the cost over their 1986 an,
years if necessary. An assessment
city is attached.
cities of 40
budget for
the Coalition's
assessments can
any time before
cities to
1 1987 budget
sheet for your
The Coalition took these actions to protect the
interests of Coalition cities and taxpayers as the legislature
considers property tax reform in 1987. If you have any questions
about the assessments or the Coalition's legislative program,
please call me at (507) 625 -3161 or Mayor Earl Laufenburger at
(507) 452 -8550.
Sincerely, •
Mayor Herb Mocol
Mankato
President, Coalition of
Outstate Cities
cc: /Gary D. Plotz
•
MINNESOTA COALITION OF OUTSTATE CITIES
ASSESSMENT FOR LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
FOR THE 1987 LEGISLATIVE SESSION
City of Hutchinson
Population 9,553
x 400
Amount of Assessment $3,821
The assessment totalling $3,821 may be paid in full
now or in installments any time before April 1, 1987. The assessment
is based on the population estimate prepared by the State Demographer
in 1985 and used for calculating 1986 LGA amounts.
Checks should be made payable to the Minnesota Coalition
of Outstate Cities and mailed to Bill Bassett, Coalition Secre-
tary- Treasurer, Mankato City Hall, 202 East Jackson, Mankato,
• Minnesota 56001.
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
NAME
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Jeffrey Buboltz
Brian Ebent
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATEIune 10, 1986
ADDRESS
.
Hector, MN
655 Southview Drive, Hutchinson
JOB TITLE Tree Inspector and Maintenance
SUPERVISED BY Bruce Ericson, Mark Schnobrich
r`EMPLOYMENT STATUS
PAY RATE T -3 and T -1
X NEW EMPLOYEE
FULL TIME
OTHER:
_X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
COMMENTS Associate degree in landscape /arboriculture
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
f '
DEPARTMENT'TqEAD
� k:
PERSONNELIMORDINATOR
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
OTY OF HUTCHINSON
NAME
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
Erica Conklin
JOB TITLE lafeguard, S%%= Instructor
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE June 11, 1986
ADDRESS
430 4th Ave SIR, Hutchinson
SUPERVISED BY Bruce Ericson, Mary Haucren
t- EMPLOYMENT STATUS
PAY RATE T3
is
X NEW EMPLOYEE OTHER:
FULL TIME X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
COMMENTS Additional staff due to heavy registration
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
DEPARTMENT - -BEAD
�t:
PERSONNEL MORDINATOR
CITY ADMTNISTRATC;
42) 587 -5151
rY OF HUTCHINS
;SHINGTON AVENUE WEST
INSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Gary Miller
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
HISTORY
•On May 30, 1986, Gary Miller submitted an application for a conditional use
permit to allow the moving of a house from 346 Hassan St to Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, California Second Addition. A public hearing was held at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Monday, June 16, 1986, at
which time there was no one present who objected to the request.
n
�J
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 5, 1986.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted, with the stipulation that
the exterior work be completed 6 months from the date the house is moved.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
SECTION 1015:55
• PUBLICATION NO. 3569
ORDINANCE NO. 14/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1015 OF THE ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED "DOGS"
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION ONE. Section 1015 of the Ordinances of the
City of Hutchinson entitled "Dogs" is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 1015:55. Dogs Creating a Nuisance. No person, firm
or corporation shall own, keep, have in their possession or
harbor any dog which, by frequent or habitual howling, yelping
or barking, shall cause a nuisance by creating a serious
annoyance or disturbance to any individual or to the
• neighborhood. This section shall not apply to any licensed
kennel, licensed veterinarian or to the City pound.
SECTION TWO. This ordinance shall take affect upon
its passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON THIS
DAY OF , 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
Paul Ackland, Mayor
(612) 587 -5151
HUnH� CITY OF HUTCHINSO
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 XD
June 10, 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland
HUTCHINSON CITY HALL
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: AGENDA ITEMS
Dear Mayor Ackland:
On Tuesday, June 3, 1986 I was asked to comment on the
status of several items currently pending. This report is
prepared as per that request.
• 1) Hutchinson Co -op Easement - -This easement was requested as
part of the Highway 7 Reconstruction Project. I have
prepared a proposed easement and forwarded said easement
to the Hutchinson Co -op for their signature. I am
enclosing a copy of that easement and letter for your
files.
2) Bethke Easement - -This easement was also requested by the
Department of Transportation in order to provide service
road facilities for the Highway 7 Project. An easement
has been drafted and sent to the Bethkes for signing. A
copy of that easement and the forwarding letter is
enclosed for your files.
3) Sorenson Property - -The Sorenson purchase was completed and
the deed signed on January 16th of 1986. This property
was Torrens rather than abstract property and a
Certificate of Title was needed to file the deed and
register the property in the municipality's name.
Mr. Sorenson thought the Certificate of Title had been
given to the City or to Buz Schantzen when the contract
for deed had originally been entered into in 1980. A
search of the municipality's files revealed that the
Certificate was not in the City's -file nor did
Mr. Schantzen's office have possession of the certificate.
• An application has been made to the Registrar of Title,
Harold Hendricksen, for issuance of a new Certificate.
Mayor Paul Ackland i
June 10, 1986
Page Two
When such a certificate has been issued, the deed may be
filed and the property registered in the municipality's
name. In the meantime a copy of the properly executed
deed should be sufficient to show to the Department of
Transportation the municipality's ownership of the
property in question.
4) Goeder's Property - -The Contract for Deed executed by
Mrs. Goeders and the municipality has been sent to the
County Recorder's Office for filing. A copy of the cover
letter is enclosed for your files.
5) Carlson Property - -A Quitclaim deed, Release of Mortgage
and Warranty Deed between the Carlsons and the
municipality has been sent to the County Recorder's Office
for filing. A copy of that cover letter is enclosed for
your files.
6) Boldt Property - -This property was purchased for use of the
new waste water treatment facility. The deed and •
certificate of real estate value was sent to the McLeod
County Recorder's Office for recording. It was apparently
returned to the City with an indication that the property
was torrens property. This means that a Certificate of
Title is necessary for the recording of the deed and the
transfer of title to the municipality. I have located the
Certificate of Title which is currently in Ron McGraw's
possession. Mr. McGraw apparently failed to provide the
municipality with the Certificate of Title at the time he
drafted the Warranty Deed. Upon receipt of the
Certificate of Title I will forward the Certificate and
the Deed to the County Recorder's Office for filing. I
have notified the County Treasurer and Assessor of the
sale and requested an abatement of any taxes that may have
been levied during the time frame the municipality has
owned the property.
7) Barking Dogs /Public Nuisance - -A proposed ordinance making
the harboring of barking dogs a public nuisance has been
prepared and is presently under consideration by this
Council packet.
8) Fuchs Property - -As part of the West River Park Project the
city purchased certain property from the Fuchs' sister.
The Fuchs sisters utilized the monies received from the
sale of their property to the city to purchase replacement •
n
�J
Mayor Paul Ackland
June 10, 1986
Page Three
property. Neil Jensen drafted the deed transferring the
Fuchs property to the municipality and also drafted the
deed whereby the Fuchs sisters were to purchase the
replacement property. Mr. Jensen transposed the legal
descriptions to the two deeds. As a result when the deeds
were recorded, it appeared that the city purchased the
Fuchs' replacement property and the Fuchs maintained
possession of the original property. As a result of
Mr. Jensen's error, the Fuchs sisters received tax
statements for the city -owned property. Mr. Jensen has
drafted corrective deeds which have been filed with the
County Recorder's Office. To the extent that any tax
delinquencies accrued on West River Park Property the
County Treasurer has been notified and requested to remove
the property from the delinquent tax list. Since the
• error was not the municipality's, any taxes that may have
accrued on the Fuchs' replacement property while the
municipality was incorrectly listed as the owner would
remain the Fuchs' responsibility.
9) vacation of a portion of Washington Avenue (Pure Culture
Products) -- Minnesota Statutes require that when a
municipality vacates a street or alleyway a certified copy
of the ordinance vacating the property should be filed
with the County Recorder's Office. To the best of my
knowledge this was done by members of the city staff. If
it has not been filed, a certified copy should be
forwarded to the McLeod County Recorder's Office.
10) Parking Appeals- -The agreement by which the parking
appeals were settled called for the municipality and the
appellants to obtain appraisals for the benefit bestowed
on the various properties by the municipal parking
program. If the appraisals differed by more than 10 %, the
municipality and the appellants were to hire a third
appraiser with the cost of the third appraiser being
shared equally by the municipality and the appellants.
This third appraiser would independently appraise the
various- properties to determine the benefit to the
properties by the municipal parking program. All three
appraisals would then be averaged and the agreed upon
Mayor Paul Ackland
Page Four
assessment would be based upon that average figure. Since
the completion of the appraisals various proposals for
settlement short of hiring the third appraiser have been
made by both parties. Since such offers have been
uniformly rejected, I have contacted the attorney for the
appellants and requested that he meet with me in an effort
to agree upon a third appraiser so that the matter may be
finally resolved and the assessments paid.
Respectfully submitted
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosures
•
n
U
0
E A S E M E N T
THIS INDENTURE, Made this day of June, 1986 by
and between Hutchinson Co -op, of the County of McLeod and
State of Minnesota, party (parties) of the first part and the
City of Hutchinson, party of the second part:
WITNESSETH:
THAT, for and in consideration of the sum of One
Dollar and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid
to the party (parties) of the first part by the party of the
second part, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged said
party (parties) of the first part do hereby grant, bargain,
sell, convey and warrant to the party of the second part, its
successors, or assigns, forever, a right -of -way and easement,
with the right, privilege, and authority to said party of the
second part, its successors, assigns, lessees, and tenants, to
construct, erect, operate and maintain, underground storm
sewer, sanitary sewer, water mains, roadway and other
utilities on, along, over, through, across, or under the
following described lands lying and being in the County of
• McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
That part of Lot Eleven, Block One, Rolling Oaks,
lying northerly of a line parallel with and 30 feet
southerly of the northerly line of said Lot Eleven.
Together with the right of said party of the second
part, its successors and assigns, to place, erect, maintain,
inspect, and relocate at will, roadway, underground sewer,
sanitary sewer, water mains, and other utilities, adding
thereto from time to time, across, through, over or under, the
above described premises, to cut and remove from said premises
on either side any trees, or other obstructions, which may
endanger the safety or interfere with the use of said roadway,
sewer, water mains, and other public utilities, fixtures or
any structures on said premises; and the right of ingress and
egress to and over said above described premises for the
purpose of repairing, renewing, or adding to said roadway,
sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and other public utilities,
and for doing anything necessary or useful or convenient for
the enjoyment of the easement herein granted; also the
privilege of removing at any time any or all of said
improvements erected or constructed upon, over, under, or on
said lands. Together with the rights, easements, privileges
•
0
and appurtenances in or to said lands, which may be required
for the full enjoyment of the rights herein granted.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The said party of the first part
has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
HUTCHINSON CO -OP
By
Its President
By
Its Vice President
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF MC LEOD )
On this day of , 1986, before me a
Notary Public, personally appeared •
Charles Radunz, President and Leonard Pikal, Vice President of
Hutchinson Co -op to me known to be the person(s)
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and
deed.
Notary Public, Minnesota
C
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
-- - HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 10, 1986
Hutchinson Co -op
Hwy 7 West
P.O. Box 214
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: SERVICE ROAD EASEMENT
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed please find a proposed easement for the
service road necessary for completion of the Highway 7 West
• Project. Could you kindly execute the easement at your
convenience and return it to my office as quickly as possible.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/ - �4
James Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosure
0
E A S E M E N T
THIS INDENTURE, Made this day of June, 1986 by
and between Larry H. Bethke and Sherry Bethke, husband and
wife, of the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota, party
(parties) of the first part and the City of Hutchinson, party
of the second part:
WITNESSETH:
THAT, for and in consideration of the sum of One
Dollar and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid
to the party (parties) of the first part by the party of the
second part, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged said
party (parties) of the first part do hereby grant, bargain,
sell, convey and warrant to the party of the second part, its
successors, or assigns, forever, a right -of -way and easement,
with the right, privilege, and authority to said party of the
second part, its successors, assigns, lessees, and tenants, to
construct, erect, operate and maintain, underground storm
sewer, sanitary sewer, water mains, roadway and other
• utilities on, along, over, through, across, or under the
following described lands lying and being in the County of
McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
That part of the following described property lying
northerly of a line parallel with and 40.00 feet
southerly of the southerly right of way line of
Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 22.
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter of Section 36, Township 117 North, Range 30
West, described as follows: Commencing at the south
quarter corner of said Section 36; thence north along
the west line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of
487.08 feet to the northerly right of way line of the
Minnesota Western Railway Company, and the point of
beginning of the land to be described; thence said
right of way line, a distance of 1056.54 feet; thence
northerly, parallel with said west line of the
Southeast Quarter, a distance of 471.20 feet to the
southerly right of way line of Minnesota Trunk Highway
No. 7 and No. 22; thence southwesterly, along said
southerly right of way line, to said west line of the
Southeast Quarter; thence south, along said west line,
a distance of 424.0 feet to the point of beginning.
Except the west 33.00 feet thereof.
•
0
Together with the right of said party of the second
part, its successors and assigns, to place, erect, maintain,
inspect, and relocate at will, roadway, underground sewer,
sanitary sewer, water mains, and other utilities, adding
thereto from time to time, across, through, over or under, the
above described premises, to cut and remove from said premises
on either side any trees, or other obstructions, which may
endanger the safety or interfere with the use of said roadway,
sewer, water mains, and other public utilities, fixtures or
any structures on said premises; and the right of ingress and
egress to and over said above described premises for the
purpose of repairing, renewing, or adding to said roadway,
sewer, water main, sanitary sewer, and other public utilities,
and for doing anything necessary or useful or convenient for
the enjoyment of the easement herein granted; also the
privilege of removing at any time any or all of said
improvements erected or constructed upon, over, under, or on
said lands. Together with the rights, easements, privileges
and appurtenances in or to said lands, which may be required
for the full enjoyment of the rights herein granted.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, The said party of the first part
has hereunto set its hand the day and year first above •
written.
IN PRESENCE OF:
By
Larry H. Bethke
By
Sherry Bethke
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF MC LEOD )
On this day of , 1986, before me a
Notary Public, personally appeared
Larry H. Bethke and Sherry Bethke, husband and wife
to me known to be the person s
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged that he executed the same as his free act and
deed.
Notary Public, Minnesota 0
(612) 587 -5151
• %�//
CITY OF HUTCH/NSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 10, 1986
Larry Bethke
1014 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: SERVICE ROAD EASEMENT
Dear Larry:
Enclosed please find a proposed Easement for the
service road necessary to complete the Highway 7 West Project.
Please execute this easement and have it returned to my office
at your earliest convenience.
. Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/ ' Dd+
James Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
Enclosure
•
n
W CHIN(612)587-51 1
SON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350 41P
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Bruce Ericson, Parks & Recreation Director
DATE: June 16, 1986
SUBJECT: North Jaycee Shelter
�4, ;'
At the directors meeting of Friday, June 13th, Gary informed me
that the shelter at North Jaycee Park should be locked up for
security reasons. I have talked this over with the Chief of Police,
Dean O'Borsky and we both feel that we have fewer problems with vandalism
keeping the shelter open rather than closed. We have had this policy
for the past two years and the vandalism problem has decreased.
The problem we had when the shelter was locked up was that kids
would break into the shelter and since they could not be viewed by
patrolmen from the street, they would cause more damage.
• Please advise me if you would prefer to keep the shelter locked, or
the current policy of not locking the shelter.
klm
•
• ADMINISTRATIVE
UPDATE
JUNE 10, 1986
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HUTCHINSON PLACED ON 1987 MPCA FUNDING LIST
ISSUE NO. 5/86
Last week I received a call from MPCA, Linda Prail, stating the City has obtained a fund-
ing ranking for 1987. This is the good news!
This funding is "subject to" an appropriation that has been held up in Congress. I would
suggest, along with Linda Prail of MPCA, that we adopt a resolution requesting our MN Sen-
ate /House Representatives to approve the appropriation.
DONOHUE RESPONDS TO VALUE ENGINEERING REPORT
You all received the voluminous value engineering report last fall. Many of the suggestions
�re not feasible after further study; some recommendations were favorably adopted and in-
uded in the plant design. This formal booklet response is available in our office for
your review. (We have two copies.)
LOCAL INDUSTRY PERMITS DRAFTED
Four local industries (3M, Ty °s, Hutch. Tech., and Pure Culture Products) have types of
waste that require special permits issued by the City under our new ordinance.
The draft permits have now been completed. We would anticipate finalization of the per-
mit requirements by July 1.
NEW DIMENSION PLATING GRANT
John Bernhagen, Ken Merrill, and I.met with two representatives of the MN Dept. of Energy
and Economic. Development. The representatives advised the City that only 10% of the paper -
work is done (the applicat:ion);- the -other 90% is yet to come.
Some of the requirement, that are in the procesr, locally are a "Community Profile ", an
"Environmental Impact Statemeat," and implementation of a "Housing Availability Plan."
The hous:'ng requirement (FEW .will- requi.re'us to hold a public hearing in the near future
and implement an educational program. Detailed quarterly reports are required, along with
a statement of the revolving loan Rind proposed guidelines (use) and implementation report.
�ls), labor objective - reports a:e necessary.
0°rF,12�
ADMINISTRATIVE UPDATE
JUNE 10, 1986 •
WEED NOTICES OUT - DEADLINE TODAY - WEEDS CUT TOMORROW AND THURSDAY
Bruce Ericson has advised me that the survey has been completed, individual notices mailed,
and that violators will be seeing the city contractor (Jim Haasl) cut weeds tomorrow.
If you have any particular question on a piece of property, check the survey list with
Bruce.
SPRAYING OF MOSQUITOS BEGUN
As of last week, I have been advised that there has been two sprayings of the City for
mosquitos. The spray becomes increasingly effective in hot weather.
SWIMMING POOL REPORT
Most swimming classes for June are full. In the last week many more family summer passes
have been sold (from 40 to 160 est.).
DENTAL INSURANCE 0
Both the City and the hospital have employee dental insurance. If the City Council agrees
to go to bid, Phil Graves has expressed an interest in bidding along with the City. We
will be using a combination of dental specs. that the hospital and City used last time.
ADDITIONAL SATTERLEE PROPERTY BEING OFFERED
Florence Satterlee requests the City Council to consider making her an offer for her prop-
erty (1.7 --2.7 acres) and tin buildings adjacent to the Satterlee pit. This piece is along the
highway. She requested the City to determine the value of any offer. If the City is not
interested, the property will probably be auctioned in July.
HOSPITAL BOARD WILL CONSIDER HEALTH COVERAGE (PHP) ON TUESDAY
Phil Graves will be taking the bid(s) to the Hospital Board meeting next Tuesday at a reg-
ular meeting. The hospital is a contract provider with PHP and also a potential user, if
the bid is awarded. Phil is also doing some negotiations of the provider side first,
so that substantial discounts under the provider (hospital) contract are not fostered on
the hospital.
r1
LJ
