Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp08-26-86 cHUTCHINSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
_August 24 TO _ Angust 30 9
1986;
WEDNESDAY
-27-
10:00 A.M. - Direclors
Meeting at
City Hall
SUNDAY
-24-
T N
THURSDAY
-28-
7:00 P.M. - Special City Council
r,ceting at City Uall
(Public Hearing)
r MONDAY
TU*AY
-�5-
-26-
}� 1
Noon - Safety Council Meeting
r;'<
at Piro Station
1 `Jr
1:30 P.M. -Utilities Commission
Meeting at Utilities
7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at
City Hall
FRIDAY
-
29 -SEMINARS
:
DEAN O'BORSKY - August 25-26
KEN MERRILL August 25-28
SATURDAY
-30-
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 26, 1986
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Reverend Wesley Yagle
3. Consideration of Minutes - Bid Openings August 11, 1986 and Regular
ee i ng o ugust_'f, Tf86
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - July 1986
2. Planning Commission Minutes of July 15, 1986
3. Nursing Home Board Minutes of July 24, 1986
(b) Consideration of Appointments:
1. Employee Educational Incentive Committee - Community
Representatives
• (c) Consideration of Request for Reduced Trash and Refuse Service
Charge
(d) Consideration of Licenses for St. Anastasia Church's Fall Festival
September 21, 1986
1. "On Sale" Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License
2. Gambling License
3. Bingo License
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to order minutes and report filed,
ratify appointments, approve request and issue cigarette
license
5. Public Hearing - 8_00 P.M.
(a) Federal Revenue Sharing Budget
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to adopt
budget as proposed
(b) Improvement Project No. 86-12 - CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 12, 1986
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
4Pproject - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 26, 1986
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Review of 1985 Financial Statements By Auditing Firm of Charles Bailly
& Company
Action -
(b) Consideration of Request for Fire Marshal to Attend Fire Instructors
Association Fall Conference And Chiefs Conference September 20-21, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
(c) Consideration of Request for Transit Coordinator To Attend Transit
Conferenfce September 17-18, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
(d) Consideration of Request for Use of Library Square for Arts And Crafts
Festival September 19-20, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Ordinance No. 20/86 - Ordinance Amending Section 710:00 of the 1974 •
Ordinance Code of the City of Hutchinson, Entitled "Stop Streets" By
Adding Subdivision No. 20 Thereto, Relative to "Traffic, Local
Regulations"
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(b) Resolution No. 8365 - Resolution for Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(c) Resolution No. 8367 - Resolution for Agreement Between City And State
for Purchase of Unicom Radio
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(d) Resolution No. 8368 - City of Hutchinson Resolution of Application
And Authorization To Execute Agreement And Certifications
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
.a) Consideration of Request for CDC Executive Director Aned City
Administrator To Attend Annual Board Retreat Of The CDC September 4-5
(DEFERRED AUGUST 12, 1986)
Action- Motion to reject - Motion to approve request
tA
r1
U
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 26, 1986
(b) Consideration of Clean Up of Ford Rolfe Third Avenue Property
(DEFERRED AUGUST 12, 1986)
Action -
(c) Review of First And Second Quarter Status Report On 1986 Objectives
(DEFERRED JULY 22, 1986)
Action -
(d) Consideration of Payment for Installation of Library Handicap Ramp
Action -
(e) Consideration of Application for Gambling Devices License By Family
Plus Inc. At 40 Hour Week (DEFERRED AUGUST 12, 1986)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue license
(f) Consideration of Freemont Avenue Cul-de-sac for Greencastle Site
Action -
• 9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Application for Transient Merchants Permit By village
Home Entertainment Center for September 6-7, 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue permit
(c) Consideration of Setting 1987 Budget Review Dates
Action -
(d) Consideration of Adopting Assessment Roll No. 222, Shady Haven Subd.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(e) Consideration of Income Guidelines for Senior Citizen Deferred
Special Assessments
Action -
is
(f) Consideration of
Application
for Deferred Special Assessments
Action - Motion
to reject -
Motion to approve deferred assessment
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 26, 1986
•
(g) Consideration of Correspondence from Victor Swanson Regarding Weed
Cutting
Action -
(h) Consideration of Fall Leaf Composting Project
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve project
(i) Consideration of Trail License Agreement Between City And MN/DNR
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract
(j) Consideration of Trail License Agreement Between Parks & Recreation
Department And MN/DNR
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract
(k) Consideration of Grade Classification Adjustments
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve adjustment(s)
(1) Consideration of Rezoning Submitted By School District No. 423 with
favorable recommendation of Planning Commission .
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive first reading
of Ordinance and set second reading for September 9, 1986
(m) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Submitted by Deloris and
Clarence Freitag with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
with contingencies
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(n) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Submitted by Pure Culture
Products with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(o) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Submitted By Frances Cannon
with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(p) Consideration of Preliminary and Final Plat Submitted by Ken Santelman
of Santelman's Second Addition with favorable recommendation of
Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution 0
9
•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 26, 1986
(q) Consideration of Amendment to Zoning Ordinance #464, Section 7.09 with
favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive first reading
of Ordinance and set second reading September 9, 1986
(r) Consideration of Proposed Registered Land Survey Submitted by Richard
Schmidtbauer with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(s) Consideration of Final Plat of Plaza Heights Submitted by Albertson And
Herman with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(t) Consideration of Final Plat of Woodridge Submitted by Mikulecky And
Compton with favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(u) Consideration of Final Plat of Schmidtbauer's Third Addition with
• favorable recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
•
5
Ll
•
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, AUGUST 11, 1986
The bid opening was called to order by Finance Director Merrill at 2:00 P.M.
Present were: Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, Police Chief Dean O'Borsky,
Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson, and Director Duane Warren of Construc-
tion Management, C.A.M., Inc.
Publication No. 3598, Invitation for Bids for Removal or Demolition of Struc-
tures from Lot 2 and 3, Block 9, South Half City, was read. The following
bids were opened:
Don Rettman Construction
Darwin, MN
Ed Rettman Excavating
Hutchinson, MN
Juul Contracting
Hutchinson, MN
PKG. 111
$1,648.00
+2,665.00 Alt
2,378.00
+3,025.00 Alt
3,920.00
+2,865.00 Alt
PKG. #2
$1,436.00
+ 550.00 Alt.
1,610.00
+ 600.00 Alt.
2,800.00
+ 705.00 Alt.
The bids were referred to the construction management consultant for review
and a recommendation to the City Council.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:10 P.M.
0
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, AUGUST 11, 1986
The bid opening was called to order by Finance Director Merrill at 2:10 P.M.
Present were: Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill and Administrative Secre-
tary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 3591, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 10,
Project No. 86-10, was dispensed with. The following bid was received and
opened:
Juul Contracting Company
Hutchinson, MN $40,046.00
The bid was referred to the City Engineer for review and awarding of the
• contract.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:15 P.M.
•
C�'
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1986
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The fol-
lowing were present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, Alder-
man Marlin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Mikulecky and Mayor Paul L. Ackland.
Also present: Assistant City Clerk Kenneth B. Merrill, Director of En-
gineering Marlow V. Priebe, and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Wesley Vagle.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the bid openings of July 21, 1986, August 5, 1986 and August
6, 1986 and regular meeting of July 22, 1986 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - JULY 1986
2. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 24, 1986
• (b) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL AT MCLEOD
COUNTY FAIR
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS:
1. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - REV. GERRIT MOLENAAR, JR.
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD - LYLE BLOCK AND BETSY CONNELLY
3. UTILITIES COMMISSION - EUGENE DAGGETT
4. EMPLOYEE EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE COMMITTEE - COMMUNITY
REPRESENTATIVES
Alderman Torgerson moved to order the minutes and report filed, to
issue a cigarette license, and to ratify the appointments, with the
omission of item (6-4. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and car-
ried unanimously.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-10
Mayor Ackland called the public hearing to order at 8:15 P.M. No one
was present to be heard, and Alderman Torgerson moved to close the
hearing at 8:16 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
• During discussion, Alderman Mikulecky questioned the method of assess-
ment and suggested splitting the cost between the east and west side
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
of School Road and the City picking up the difference. The motion was
made by Alderman Mikulecky that the cost of the project plus oversize
and the properties on the east and west side of School Road be assessed
equal amounts. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unani-
mously.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky to award the bid to Juul Con-
tracting for $40,046 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8349. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to order preparation of
assessment roll No. 221 and set public hearing for September 9, 1986 at
8:00 P.M., to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8350 and No.
8351. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(b) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-11
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:35 P.M.
Mrs. Ed Klima Sr., adjacent property owner at 647 Bluff Street, stated
the road had been raised about four feet, creating a wall that does not
slope down into their backyard. As a result, they have not been able
to use the yard or the basement garage. A real estate agent assessed
her property and felt the improvement had devalued it approximately $2- •
4,000. She requested the project be corrected.
City Engineer Priebe reported the road had been raised 3-1/2 feet. The
contractor put in a curb to alleviate a water problem. Waller Drive
was never developed to provide sewer service, and the plats were not
properly developed. It was stated the project was not completed.
Alderman Torgerson moved to close the hearing at 8:50 P.M. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, to
approve project No. 86-11, order preparation of plans and specifica-
tions, and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8364. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(c) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-12
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:51 P.M.
City Engineer Priebe presented a map showing the proposed service road.
He stated the service road could be extended to the west in 1987.
Mr. Arl'e Schlecht from Plowman's inquired about the proposed project
and how it would benefit their business. He requested the City use the
ditch to make a service road instead of taking some of their property.
Plowman's recently installed new lighting in front of their business, •
and a service road along their property would require relocation of the
E
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
lights at considerable expense.
Mr. Scott Plowman commented that the proposed service road would elim-
inate the first row of cars, the lights and go back to the second row
of cars to the flag pole. It would be 30 feet from the front of the
show room.
Mr. Bud Maynard raised a question regarding the intersection and the
service road. He asked if it would be feasible in the future to come
that close and how the City would control the traffic. He felt the
over-all plan should be to wait before putting in a portion of the
road and perform "magic" on the other portion. Mr. Maynard also ques-
tioned a 40 foot service road and suggested cutting down the 15 foot
turn lanes on the highway.
Engineer Priebe explained the City was looking at a service road from
Plowman's to Big Bear. The Tom Thumb business could be approached from
California Street, although the gas pumps could be moved if the road
was extended. A stop light could be installed at California Street in
the future.
A representative of the Big Bear Stores reported his company was in
favor of the service road project inasmuch as the Hutchinson customers
• would not have future access to the store without it.
Mr. John Miller stated the proposed project did not affect property
east of California but it will eventually. He commented he did not
like the way the State dictated the way the project was to be done, and
he didn't think the turn median was necessary. It was his feeling the
speed limit could be reduced.
At 9:30 P.M. Alderman Torgerson moved to continue the hearing. Motion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY POLICE CHIEF O'BORSKY, SERGEANTS GREGOR AND
KIRCHOFF TO ATTEND CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE AUGUST 25-26, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
approve the request. During discussion, City Attorney Schaefer re-
quested authorization to also attend the institute. Alderman Carls
amended his motion to include Attorney Schaefer. Amended motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. Main motion carried
unanimously.
(b) COMMUNICATION FROM FORD ROLFE REGARDING COMPLAINT OF CARS AND DEBRIS ON
PROPERTY
• Following discussion of the debris and old cars at the Ford Rolfe prop-
erty on Third Avenue, it was the consensus of the Council that addi-
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
tional action was needed to clean up the property. Alderman Carls
moved to direct City Attorney Schaefer to take appropriate actions to
start wheels of justice moving and report back to the next Council
meeting and all future meetings until resolved. Motion seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) PRESENTATION BY CED/DONOHUE REGARDING STEP 3 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
Mike Hoff and Don Roecker from Donohue & Associates presented a report
on step 3 of the sewgge treatment plant. The proposal will be pre-
sented to the MPCA at an August 26 board meeting for an $8.8 million
grant, with 65% funding on federal level and 60% funding over entire
project. The MPCA will do a cost analysis on each portion of Hutchin-
son's proposal. It was reported that the estimated cost of the project
for Phase III would be $1,216,000.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the proposed con-
tract, subject to MPCA approval. Alderman Torgerson seconded the mo-
tion and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. TO BLOCK OFF
STREET BETWEEN LIBRARY SQUARWE AND D.J. MAC'S FROM 1:00 - 5:00 P.M.
ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson •
and carried unanimously, to approve the request.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND GOVERNMENTAL
FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION TRAINING SESSIONS
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the request. Motion seconded by Ald-
erman Carls and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CITY
ADMINISTRATOR TO ATTEND ANNUAL BOARD RETREAT OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEPTEMBER 4-5, 1986
Following discussion that the workshop should be held locally, Alder-
man Mikulecky moved to reject the request. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Mlinar and failed upon roll call vote of Alderman Mikulecky voting
aye and Aldermen Carls, Mlinar, Torgerson and Mayor Ackland voting nay.
Alderman Mlinar moved to table action until the next City Council meet-
ing and to inform the CDC of the Council concerns to hold the workshop
locally. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
7. RESPLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 19/86 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS LOCATED IN ORCHARD PARK FIRST ADDITION 0
4
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
Alderman Mlinar moved to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance
No. The motion was seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried
unanimously.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 8345 - AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A POLICE FACILITY
CONSTRUCTION FUND AND TRANSFERRING $99,500 FROM THE FIRE HALL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls
and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8345.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 8346 - RESOLUTION SETTING ELECTION, TIME, PLACE
LOCATIONS OF PRECINCTS, AND APPOINTING OF JUDGES FOR THE CITY PRIMARY
AND GENERAL ELECTION
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8346.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 8347 - TRANSFERRING $20,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO
GENERAL FUND
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to waive reading and adopt
• Resolution No. 8347. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion and unani-
mously carried.
RECESS: The City Council adjourned for a 15 minute recess at 11:00 P.M.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR 1986 STREET DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS (DEFERRED AUGUST 5, 1986)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to award the contract to Koch Asphalt Company at their bid price of
$9,387 for RC -250, $8,887 for FC -800, and $8,887 for MC -300 (10,000
gallon asphalt cutback respectively). Motion unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR USED TANDEM DUMP TRUCK
Alderman Carls moved to approve and award the contract to Mankato Mack
at $23,950 for a 1978 Mack truck, which includes trade-in of the City's
1972 International tandem dump truck. Motion seconded by Alderman Tor-
gerson and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ROBERTS FIRST ADDITION
(DEFERRED JULY 22, 1986)
• Engineer Priebe presented five alternatives of drainage improvements
for Roberts First Addition. The proposed project would include three
catch basins instead of two on Larson Street. There would be a larger
R
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
0
line on south Larson Street and a large trunk line on Kay Street.
Mr. Wayne Scott, 525 Larson, thought it was not reasonable to run more
water north to Roberts Road. The water from Mr. Wagner's field runs
onto the adjoining properties. He inquired if there was a right-of-way
to put the storm sewer across Wagner's field. It was pointed out there
was no basement under the house torn down, which had been discussed at
a previous meeting.
Engineer Priebe stated the City would have to obtain an easement to
reach the right-of-way in the field and pay for the crop loss caused
by going across the field.
Mr. Dale Herrmann, 550 Larson, thought it was reasonable to catch the
water at the south end of Larson Street and bring it over to Kay
Street. He wanted to pay for only a fraction of the new project.
Mr. Julius Rainwater, 565 Larson, commented on the 21" line going down
Roberts Road and asked if the residents on that street have any drain-
age problem. He felt the City needed to look at the field in the fu-
ture.
Mr. Roger Reinhart, 545 Larson, inquired what would be involved for
alternative No. 2 and asked if it would leave the catch basin north on
Larson Street to drain into Roberts Road. He was in favor of addi-
•
tional lines since something needs to be done with the easterly runoff.
Alderman Mlinar moved that the City Engineer obtain additional figures
for two catch basins, with the project to include the east side of Lar-
son Street, a berm and drainage, leaving the present system on Larson
draining to the north, look at alternative No. 2 with catch basins on
the south and drain to Kay Street, and to talk to Mr. Wagner regard-
ing the cost for a right-of-way to his field, and a berm on the south.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to order a report on Project
No. 86-14, to set a public hearing for September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M.,
and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8354 and No. 8355.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MAINTENANCE OF SOUTHEAST (VOCATIONAL
SITE) WATER TOWER (DEFERRED AUGUST 6, 1986)
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and award contract to Maguire Iron at
a cost of $18,860 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8348.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF SURVEY OF SEVEN OUTSTATE CITIES FOR BUILDING PERMIT
FEES
•
Building Inspector Jim Marka reviewed the survey of cities and recom-
H
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
mended the City retain the 1982 fee schedule already in effect. Dis-
cussion was also given to fees for roofing.
Alderman Torgerson moved to retain the 1982 fee schedule already in ef-
fect. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS) FOR REMOVAL OR DEMOLITION OF
STRUCTURES ON LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 9, SOUTH HALF CITY
(BID OPENING AUGUST 11, 1986)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and award the bids for demolition to Don Rettman Construc-
tion & Excavating for $1,648 plus $2,265 alternate compacted fill (bid
package #1) and $1,436 plus $550 alternate (bid package #2). The City
Engineer requested that the contractor be required to provide the City
with a county solid waste permit for dumping debris. Alderman Torger-
son amended his motion to include stipulations for dumping of debris.
Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
Main motion carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF HANSEN-NONWEILER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
• Assistant City Clerk Merrill stated this item goes back several years.
One assessment was placed on the wrong parcel. The buyer of the prop-
erty was informed of the error and a refund was issued. The present
property owner believes he should not pay the $1,827.12 assessment,
although he did not pay it before.
It was the City Attorney's legal opinion to assess it out as in past
practice. The amount was due and payable by Hansen.
Alderman Mlinar moved to assess it out as in past practice. Motion
seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 1986 MAINTENANCE FUNDS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to
approve the request for an additional $13,000 for 1986 street main-
tenance. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION ON STATUS OF EMMA LAKE PROPERTY WILLED TO CITY OF
HUTCHINSON
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to put the Emma Lake property
up for sale. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson. Aldermen Carls
amended the motion to obtain two appraisals from local real estate
• agents and authorize the City Administrator to prepare an advertisement
for bids. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried
unanimously. Main motion unanimously carried.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
0
(d) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE BY FAMILY
PLUS INC. AT 40 HOUR WEEK
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to table the item until
the August 26, 1986 meeting for further information. Motion seconded
by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST PHASE 1986 CONSTRUCTION FOR WOODRIDGE
SUBDIVISION
City Engineer Priebe reported that Woodridge Subdivision was being fin-
alized, and the developers would like to have the first phase construc-
tion done. The funds were available in the bond issue.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve project No. 86-13 and to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8352 and No. 8353 ordering a re-
port and setting a public hearing September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried, with Alderman Mikulecky
abstaining from voting.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 218 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to •
order preparation of assessment roll No. 218, set a public hearing
September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Reso-
lutions No. 8338 and No. 8339. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and
unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 219 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to order the preparation of
assessment roll No. 219, set a public hearing September 9, 1986 at
8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8340 and No.
8341. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 220 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to order preparation of assessment roll No. 220,
set a public hearing September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive read-
ings and adopt Resolutions No. 8343 and No. 8344. Motion unanimously
carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONS AT MIDWEST TRAILER PARK
Mr. Sam Ulland, owner of Midwest Trailer Park, presented to the Council •
a contract with Mathews Sewer Systems from Glencoe to repair the sani-
tary sewer at the trailer court.
0
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
The City Attorney informed Mr. Ulland that he did not have a 1986
license from the MN Department of Health to operate the trailer court.
Further, four of his units were in violation of municipal regulations.
Mr. Ulland would be cited for: 1) a misdemeanor for operating without a
license; 2) violation of discharging waste water onto private property;
3) municipality authorize the building department, or an appropriate
agency, to hire someone to do the repair work if not done by Mathews
one week from today; and 4) the Department of Health was going to pur-
sue an injunction against Mr. Ulland for discharing waste water on the
ground. However, it may be alleviated if the repair work was done in
the next several days.
Inspector Marka reported this situation went back to November 1985, and
he had little cooperation from the MN Health Department.
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved that the City Attorney's recom-
mendations become the action of the City. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF STOP SIGN ON CALIFORNIA STREET NORTH
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve the stop sign and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 20/86
and set the second reading August 26, 1986. Motion unanimously car-
ried.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF PERFORMANCE REVIEWS FOR EMPLOYEES WITH JULY AND AUGUST
ANNIVERSARY DATES
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the recommen-
dations. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried four to one,
with Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF REFINANCING EXISTING INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY
Mr. Walter Clay, President of the Hutchinson Telephone Company, re-
quested a public hearing date to consider refinancing the 1981 IRB.
Since interest rates have gone down, the phone company would like to
recall their bonds and refinance at a lower interest rate.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and set a public
hearing August 28, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 8342. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and car-
ried unanimously.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF WAIVING BUILDI14G PERMIT FEE (EXCEPT FOR STATE
SURCHARGE) FOR ERECTION OF LOG CABIN BY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
is Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded
by Alderman Carls, to approve and waive the fee. Motion unanimously
7
« ..�F ��yhy.}'fenlCrlHF"x#r �rt.'.;.1+'a, »'�•'T+$;. _.
isCITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
carried.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SATELLITE
LIQUORand carried unanimously.
rove a
After discussion, Alderman Torgerson made the motion to approve
study. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
(o) CONSIDERATION OLFIRENEWING
PECTIONSCONTRACT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR LOCAL
HOTEL AND M rove
Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and
Following
ter into a contract, motion was made by Alderman Carls to approve
and
unanimously carried.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR PROPOSED ALLEY
CHANGES
fety problem on the east end of the
Engineer Priebe reported on the sa
church building.
Alderman Carls secondoved to table until August 26. The motion failed for
lack of a rove, contingent tha
osal. Motion seconded by Alderman Mli
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve
the utilities approve the pro P
and carried unanimously.
ET
(q) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING the budgeUD and seta public
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve amending
hearing August 26, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. Alderman Carls seconded the mo
carried.
tion and unanimousl
10. MISCELLANEOUS
TANT CITY CLERK
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ASSISwould
Assistant Merrill reported a represen g to re ieC
wtl
the City's 1985 finan-
be present at the next Council meeting
cial report.
It was pointed out that the Council needed to establish some dates o
work on the 1981 budget,
and the dates would be determined tober 10 he
August 26 meeting. The budget has to be adopted
application for an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license was
Fair Board after the agenda deadline
An app Alderman Torgerson
received from the McLeod
The motion was made by Mon
and approval was req to approve and issue the license.
seconded by Alderman Miinar,
unanimously carried.
10
0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
It was reported that the rodent problem was being resolved.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS
Alderman Carls requested that the City Administrator contact the PCA to
obtain figures on what collection fees and percent of total contract
other engineering firms were charging for work done on sewage treatment
plants. It was the consensus of the Council that Randy DeYries should
devote more time to working on the proposed plant and possibly hire an
additional person to work at the plant.
A question was raised on where the City stands with the solid waste
committee. City Engineer Priebe reported the County had a study in
progress, and the City had met several times.
Alderman Carls inquired if the issue had been resolved as to who was
paying for the cost of the handicapped ramp at the public library.
It was requested this item be placed on the agenda for the August 26
meeting.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar suggested that Building Inspector Jim Marka be con-
tacted to help with the wastewater plant inasmuch as he was knowledge-
able in this area.
Alderman Mlinar commented on the memorandum received concerning the
cost of the police station building. It was reported by Alderman Tor-
gerson that at a recent meeting with the architect and building com-
mittee, the architect was told to cut the cost to the amount available.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland inquired about the Airport Commission minutes and an out-
standing bill. He was informed by the Finance Director it had been re-
solved.
Mayor Ackland stated the Community Energy Council was considering ap-
plying for a $15,000 grant, with 10% or $1,500 matching funds from the
City. The grant would cover costs to do an analysis of businesses and
recommendations of ways to save energy. The study would be done during
the winter months. The grant application will be submitted for ap-
proval at the August 26 Council meeting.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky,
to approve the $1,500 matching funds from the contingency fund. Motion
unanimously carried.
• It was reported that the City Attorney had not been considered for a
cost of living increase the first of the year when the City employees
received a three percent increase. The motion was made by Alderman
11
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
Mlinar to approve a three percent cap increase for the City Attorney, •
retroactive January 1, 1986. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and
carried three to two, with Aldermen Mlinar and Torgerson and Mayor Ack-
land voting aye and Aldermen Carl and Mikulecky voting nay.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson inquired if anything had been heard from Junker San-
itation regarding his rate increase. The answer was "nothing."
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky commented on the memorandum received regarding the
use of the motor vehicle machine by a handicapped person.
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY JAMES SCHAEFER
Attorney Schaefer gave a status report on the lawsuit of McGee vs. the
City of Hutchinson. He also stated the insurance company had settled
for the full amount on the fire truck accident.
(h) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING MARLOW V. PRIEBE
Engineer Priebe commented on the Gopher Engineering memorandum regard- .
ing the railroad track. He stated the track should have some blacktop
put in on either side of the track, and this work could be done by the
Street Department employees.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve and authorize
payment from the appropriate funds. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:05 A.M.
12
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1986
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The fol-
lowing were present: Alderman Mike Carls, Alderman John Mlinar, Alder-
man Marlin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Mikulecky and Mayor Paul L. Ackland.
Also present: Assistant City Clerk Kenneth B. Merrill, Director of En-
gineering Marlow V. Priebe, and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Wesley Vagle.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the bid openings of July 21, 1986, August 5, 1986 and August
6, 1986 and regular meeting of July 22, 1986 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - JULY 1986
2. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 24, 1986
(b) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION TO SELL CIGARETTES AT RETAIL AT MCLEOD
COUNTY FAIR
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENTS:
1. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - REV. GERRIT MOLENAAR, JR.
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD - LYLE BLOCK AND BETSY CONNELLY
3. UTILITIES COMMISSION - EUGENE DAGGETT
4. EMPLOYEE EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE COMMITTEE - COMMUNITY
REPRESENTATIVES
Alderman Torgerson moved to order the minutes and report filed, to
issue a cigarette license, and to ratify the appointments, with the
omission of item (c)-4. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and car-
ried unanimously.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-10
Mayor Ackland called the public hearing to order at 8:15 P.M. No one
was present to be heard, and Alderman Torgerson moved to close the
hearing at 8:16 P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried
unanimously.
During discussion, Alderman Mikulecky questioned the method of assess-
ment and suggested splitting the cost evenly between the properties on
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
the east and west side of School Road and the City picking up the over-
size. The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky that the cost of the
project, less the amount for the oversize, be assessed to the proper-
ties on the east and west side of School Road in an equal amount.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky to award the bid to Juul Con-
tracting for $40,046 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8349. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to order preparation of
assessment roll No. 221 and set public hearing for September 9, 1986 at
8:00 P.M., to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8350 and No.
8351. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(b) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-11
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:35 P.M.
Mrs. Ed Klima Sr., adjacent property owner at 647 Bluff Street, stated
the road had been raised about four feet, creating a wall that does not
slope down into their backyard. As a result, they have not been able
to use the yard or the basement garage. A real estate agent assessed
her property and felt the improvement had devalued it approximately $2-
4,000. She requested the project be corrected.
City Engineer Priebe reported the road had been raised 3-1/2 feet. The
contractor put in a curb to alleviate a water problem. Waller Drive
was never developed to provide sewer service, and the plats were not
properly developed. It was stated the project was not completed.
Alderman Torgerson moved to close the hearing at 8:50 P.M. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, to
approve project No. 86-11, order preparation of plans and specifica-
tions, and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8364. Motion car-
ried unanimously.
(c) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 86-12
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:51 P.M.
City Engineer Priebe presented a map showing the proposed service road.
He stated the service road could be extended to the west in 1987.
Mr. Arlie Schlecht from Plowman's inquired about the proposed project
and how it would benefit their business. He requested the City use the
ditch to make a service road instead of taking some of their property.
Plowman's recently installed new lighting in front of their business,
and a service road along their property would require relocation of the
E
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
lights at considerable expense.
Mr. Scott Plowman commented that the proposed service road would elim-
inate the first row of cars, the lights and go back to the second row
of cars to the flag pole. It would be 30 feet from the front of the
show room.
Mr. Bud Maynard raised a question regarding the intersection and the
service road. He asked if it would be feasible in the future to come
that close and how the City would control the traffic. He felt the
over-all plan should be to wait before putting in a portion of the
road and perform "magic" on the other portion. Mr. Maynard also ques-
tioned a 40 foot service road and suggested cutting down the 15 foot
turn lanes on the highway.
Engineer Priebe explained the City was looking at a service road from
Plowman's to Big Bear. The Tom Thumb business could be approached from
California Street, although the gas pumps could be moved if the road
was extended. A stop light could be installed at California Street in
the future.
A representative of the Big Bear Stores reported his company was in
favor of the service road project inasmuch as the Hutchinson customers
would not have future access to the store without it.
Mr. John Miller stated the proposed project did not affect property
east of California but it wi 1 1 eventually. He commented he did not
like the way the State dictated the way the project was to be done, and
he didn't think the turn median was necessary. It was his feeling the
speed limit could be reduced.
At 9:30 P.M. Alderman Torgerson moved to continue the hearing. Motion
seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
6. COMMUNICATIONS; REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY POLICE CHIEF O'BORSKY, SERGEANTS GREGOR AND
KIRCHOFF TO ATTEND CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE AUGUST 25-26, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to
approve the request. During discussion, City Attorney Schaefer re-
quested authorization to also attend the institute. Alderman Carls
amended his motion to include Attorney Schaefer. Amended motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. Main motion carried
unanimously.
(b) COMMUNICATION FROM FORD ROLFE REGARDING COMPLAINT OF CARS AND DEBRIS ON
PROPERTY
Following discussion of the debris and old cars at the Ford Rolfe prop-
erty on Third Avenue, it was the consensus of the Council that addi-
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
tional action was needed to clean up the property. Alderman Carls
moved to direct City Attorney Schaefer to take appropriate Actions to
start wheels of justice moving and report back to the next Council
meeting and all future meetings until resolved. Motion seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) PRESENTATION BY CED/DONOHUE REGARDING STEP 3 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
Mike Hoff and Don Roecker from Donohue & Associates presented a report
on step 3 of the sewgge treatment plant. The proposal will be pre-
sented to the MPCA at an August 26 board meeting for an $8.8 million
grant, with 65% funding on federal level and 60% funding over entire
project. The MPCA will do a cost analysis on each portion of Hutchin-
son's proposal. It was reported that the estimated cost of the project
for Phase III would be $1,216,000.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the proposed con-
tract, subject to MPCA approval. Alderman Torgerson seconded the mo-
tion and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO. TO BLOCK OFF
STREET BETWEEN LIBRARY SQUARWE AND D.J. MAC'S FROM 1:00 - 5:00 P.M.
ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson
and carried unanimously, to approve the request.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY FINANCE DIRECTOR TO ATTEND GOVERNMENTAL
FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION TRAINING SESSIONS
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the request. Motion seconded by Ald-
erman Carls and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR CDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CITY
ADMINISTRATOR TO ATTEND ANNUAL BOARD RETREAT OF THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SEPTEMBER 4-5, 1986
Following discussion that the workshop should be held locally, Alder-
man Mikulecky moved to reject the request. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Mlinar and failed upon roll call vote of Alderman Mikulecky voting
aye and Aldermen Carls, Mlinar, Torgerson and Mayor Ackland voting nay.
Alderman Mlinar moved to table action until the next City Council meet-
ing and to inform the CDC of the Council concerns to hold the workshop
locally. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 19/86 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS LOCATED IN ORCHARD PARK FIRST ADDITION
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
Alderman Mlinar moved to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance
No. . The motion was seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried
unanimously.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 8345 - AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A POLICE FACILITY
CONSTRUCTION FUND AND TRANSFERRING $99,500 FROM THE FIRE HALL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls
and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8345.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 8346 - RESOLUTION SETTING ELECTION, TIME, PLACE
LOCATIONS OF PRECINCTS, AND APPOINTING OF JUDGES FOR THE CITY PRIMARY
AND GENERAL ELECTION
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8346.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) RESOLUTION N0. 8347 - TRANSFERRING $20,000 FROM LIQUOR STORE TO
GENERAL FUND
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 8347. Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion and unani-
mously carried.
RECESS: The City Council adjourned for a 15 minute recess at 11:00 P.M.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR 1986 STREET DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE
MATERIALS (DEFERRED AUGUST 5, 1986)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to award the contract to Koch Asphalt Company at their bid price of
$9,387 for RC -250, $8,887 for FC -800, and $8,887 for MC -300 (10,000
gallon asphalt cutback respectively). Motion unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR USED TANDEM DUMP TRUCK
Alderman Carls moved to approve and award the contract to Mankato Mack
at $23,950 for a 1978 Mack truck, which includes trade-in of the City's
1972 International tandem dump truck. Motion seconded by Alderman Tor-
gerson and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR ROBERTS FIRST ADDITION
(DEFERRED JULY 22, 1986)
Engineer Priebe presented five alternatives of drainage improvements
for Roberts First Addition. The proposed project would include three
catch basins instead of two on Larson Street. There would be a larger
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
line on south Larson Street and a large trunk line on Kay Street.
Mr. Wayne Scott, 525 Larson, thought it was not reasonable to run more
water north to Roberts Road. The water from Mr. Wagner's field runs
onto the adjoining properties. He inquired if there was a right-of-way
to put the storm sewer across Wagner's field. It was pointed out there
was no basement under the house torn down, which had been discussed at
a previous meeting.
Engineer Priebe stated the City would have to obtain an easement to
reach the right-of-way in the field and pay for the crop loss caused
by going across the field.
Mr. Dale Herrmann, 550 Larson, thought it was reasonable to catch the
water at the south end of Larson Street and bring it over to Kay
Street. He wanted to pay for only a fraction of the new project.
Mr. Julius Rainwater, 565 Larson, commented on the 21" line going down
Roberts Road and asked if the residents on that street have any drain-
age problem. He felt the City needed to look at the field in the fu-
ture.
Mr. Roger Reinhart, 545 Larson, inquired what would be involved for
alternative No. 2 and asked if it would leave the catch basin north on
Larson Street to drain into Roberts Road. He was in favor of addi-
tional lines since something needs to be done with the easterly runoff.
Alderman Mlinar moved that the City Engineer obtain additional figures
for two catch basins, with the project to include the east side of Lar-
son Street, a berm and drainage, leaving the present system on Larson
draining to the north, look at alternative No. 2 with catch basins on
the south and drain to Kay Street, and to talk to Mr. Wagner regard-
ing the cost for a right-of-way to his field, and a berm on the south.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to order a report on Project
No. 86-14, to set a public hearing for September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M.,
and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8354 and No. 8355.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR MAINTENANCE OF SOUTHEAST (VOCATIONAL
SITE) WATER TOWER (DEFERRED AUGUST 6, 1986)
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and award contract to Maguire Iron at
a cost of $18,860 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8348.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF SURVEY OF SEVEN OUTSTATE CITIES FOR BUILDING PERMIT
FEES
Building Inspector Jim Marka reviewed the survey of cities and recom-
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
mended the City retain the 1982 fee schedule already in effect. Dis-
cussion was also given to fees for roofing.
Alderman Torgerson moved to retain the 1982 fee schedule already in ef-
fect. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS) FOR REMOVAL OR DEMOLITION OF
STRUCTURES ON LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 9, SOUTH HALF CITY
(BID OPENING AUGUST 11, 1986)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and award the bids for demolition to Don Rettman Construc-
tion & Excavating for $1,648 plus $2,265 alternate compacted fill (bid
package #1) and $1,436 plus $550 alternate (bid package #2). The City
Engineer requested that the contractor be required to provide the City
with a county solid waste permit for dumping debris. Alderman Torger-
son amended his motion to include stipulations for dumping of debris.
Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
Main motion carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF HANSEN-NONWEILER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
Assistant City Clerk Merrill stated this item goes back several years.
One assessment was placed on the wrong parcel. The buyer of the prop-
erty was informed of the error and a refund was issued. The present
property owner believes he should not pay the $1,827.12 assessment,
although he did not pay it before.
It was the City Attorney's legal opinion to assess it out as in past
practice. The amount was due and payable by Hansen.
Alderman Mlinar moved to assess it out as in past practice. Motion
seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL 1986 MAINTENANCE FUNDS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to
approve the request for an additional $13,000 for 1986 street main-
tenance. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION ON STATUS OF EMMA LAKE PROPERTY WILLED TO CITY OF
HUTCHINSON
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to put the Emma Lake property
up for sale. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson. Alderman Carls
amended the motion to obtain two appraisals from local real estate
agents and authorize the City Administrator to prepare an advertisement
for bids. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and carried
unanimously. Main motion unanimously carried.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
(d) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE BY FAMILY
PLUS INC. AT 40 HOUR WEEK
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to table the item until
the August 26, 1986 meeting for further information. Motion seconded
by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF FIRST PHASE 1986 CONSTRUCTION FOR WOODRIDGE
SUBDIVISION
City Engineer Priebe reported that Woodridge Subdivision was being fin-
alized, and the developers would like to have the first phase construc-
tion done. The funds were available in the bond issue.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve project No. 86-13 and to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8352 and No. 8353 ordering a re-
port and setting a public hearing September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M.
Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried, with Alderman Mikulecky
abstaining from voting.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 218 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to
order preparation of assessment roll No: 218, set a public hearing
September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Reso-
lutions No. 8338 and No. 8339. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and
unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 219 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to order the preparation of
assessment roll No. 219, set a public hearing September 9, 1986 at
8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8340 and No.
8341. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION
OF ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 220 AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to order preparation of assessment roll No. 220,
set a public hearing September 9, 1986 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive read-
ings and adopt Resolutions No. 8343 and No. 8344. Motion unanimously
carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONS AT MIDWEST TRAILER PARK
Mr. Sam UlIand, owner of Midwest Trailer Park, presented to the Council
a contract with Mathews Sewer Systems from Glencoe to repair the sani-
tary sewer at the trailer court.
9
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
The City Attorney informed Mr. Ulland that he did not have a 1986
license from the MN Department of Health to operate the trailer court.
Further, four of his units were in violation of municipal regulations.
Mr. Ulland would be cited for: 1) a misdemeanor for operating without a
license; 2) violation of discharging waste water onto private property;
3) municipality authorize the building department, or an appropriate
agency, to hire someone to do the repair work if not done by Mathews
one week from today; and 4) the Department of Health was going to pur-
sue an injunction against Mr. Ulland for discharing waste water on the
ground. However, it may be alleviated if the repair work was done in
the next several days.
Inspector Marka reported this situation went back to November 1985, and
he had little cooperation from the MN Health Department.
After discussion, Alderman Carls moved that the City Attorney's recom-
mendations become the action of the City. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF STOP SIGN ON CALIFORNIA STREET NORTH
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve the stop sign and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 20/86
and set the second reading August 26, 1986. Motion unanimously car-
ried.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF PERFORMANCE REVIEWS FOR EMPLOYEES WITH JULY AND AUGUST
ANNIVERSARY DATES
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the recommen-
dations. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried four to one,
with Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF REFINANCING EXISTING INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS FOR
HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY
Mr. Walter Clay, President of the Hutchinson Telephone Company, re-
quested a public hearing date to consider refinancing the 1981 IRB.
Since interest rates have gone down, the phone company would like to
recall their bonds and refinance at a lower interest rate.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and set a public
hearing August 28, 1986 at 7:00 P.M. and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 8342. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and car-
ried unanimously.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF WAIVING BUILDING PERMIT FEE (EXCEPT FOR STATE
SURCHARGE) FOR ERECTION OF LOG CABIN BY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded
by Alderman Carls, to approve and waive the fee. Motion unanimously
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
carried.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING A FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR A SATELLITE
LIQUOR STORE
After discussion, Alderman Torgerson made the motion to approve a
study. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF RENEWING CONTRACT WITH STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR LOCAL
HOTEL AND MOTEL INSPECTIONS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls to approve
and enter into a contract. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and
unanimously carried.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH FOR PROPOSED ALLEY
CHANGES
Engineer Priebe reported on the safety problem on the east end of the
church building.
Alderman Carls moved to table until August 26. The motion failed for
lack of a second.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve, contingent that
the utilities approve the proposal. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and carried unanimously.
(q) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve amending the budget and set a public
hearing August 26, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. Alderman Carls seconded the mo-
tion and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
Assistant Merril I reported a representative from Charles Bail ley would
be present at the next Council meeting to review the City's 1985 finan-
cial report.
It was pointed out that the Council needed to establish some dates to
work on the 1987 budget, and the dates would be determined at the
August 26 meeting. The budget has to be adopted by October 10.
An application for an on -sale non -intoxicating malt liquor license was
received from the McLeod County Fair Board after the agenda deadline
and approval was requested. The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson,
seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to approve and issue the license. Motion
unanimously carried.
10
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
It was reported that the rodent problem was being resolved.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS
Alderman Carls requested that the City Administrator contact the PCA to
obtain figures on what collection fees and percent of total contract
other engineering firms were charging for work done on sewage treatment
plants. It was the consensus of the Council that Randy DeVries should
devote more time to working on the proposed plant and possibly hire an
additional person to work at the plant.
A question was raised on where the City stands with the solid waste
committee. City Engineer Priebe reported the County had a study in
progress, and the City had met several times.
Alderman Carls inquired if the issue had been resolved as to who was
paying for the cost of the handicapped ramp at the public library.
It was requested this item be placed on the agenda for the August 26
meeting.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar suggested that Building Inspector Jim Marka be con-
tacted to help with the wastewater plant inasmuch as he was knowledge-
able in this area.
Alderman Mlinar commented on the memorandum received concerning the
cost of the police station building. It was reported by Alderman Tor-
gerson that at a recent meeting with the architect and building com-
mittee, the architect was told to cut the cost to the amount available.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland inquired about the Airport Commission minutes and an out-
standing bill. He was informed by the Finance Director it had been re-
solved.
Mayor Ackland stated the Community Energy Council was considering ap-
plying for a $15,000 grant, with 10% or $1,500 matching funds from the
City. The grant would cover costs to do an analysis of businesses and
recommendations of ways to save energy. The study would be done during
the winter months. The grant application will be submitted for ap-
proval at the August 26 Council meeting.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky,
to approve the $1,500 matching funds from the contingency fund. Motion
unanimously carried.
It was reported that the City Attorney had not been considered for a
cost of living increase the first of the year when the City employees
received a three percent increase. The motion was made by Alderman
11
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - AUGUST 12, 1986
Mlinar to approve a three percent cap increase for the City Attorney,
retroactive January 1, 1986. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and
carried three to two, with Aldermen Mlinar and Torgerson and Mayor Ack-
land voting aye and Aldermen Carl and Mikulecky voting nay.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson inquired if anything had been heard from Junker San-
itation regarding his rate increase. The answer was "nothing."
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky commented on the memorandum received regarding the
use of the motor vehicle machine by a handicapped person.
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY JAMES SCHAEFER
Attorney Schaefer gave a status report on the lawsuit of McGee vs. the
City of Hutchinson. He also stated the insurance company had settled
for the full amount on the fire truck accident.
(h) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING MARLOW V. PRIEBE
Engineer Priebe commented on the Gopher Engineering memorandum regard-
ing the railroad track. He stated the track should have some blacktop
put in on either side of the track, and this work could be done by the
Street Department employees.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to approve and authorize
payment from the appropriate funds. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:05 A.M.
12
JULY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1986
JULY
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
JULY
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
•
ACTUAL
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
1224.33
484966.56
1322050.00
837083.44
0.37
LICENSES
101.00
12153.32
17050.00
4896.68
0.71
PERMITS AND FEES
9152.58
66900.74
67300.00
399.26
0.99
INTER -GOVERNMENT REVENUE
604369.98
649172.79
1010302.00
361129.21
0.64
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
32933.27
221945.62
491765.00
269819.38
0.45
FINES & FORFEITS
3293.19
16865.83
25000.00
6134.17
0.75
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
9786.97
75645.47
88800.00
13154.53
0.85
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
20000.00
170000.00
465500.00
295500.00
0.37
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
478.66
2348.28
200.00
-2148.28
11.74
TOTAL
681339.98
1701998.61
3487967.00
178596B.39
0.49
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
4-a. (I)
MAYOR & COUNCIL
2389.94
16313.95
27549.00
11235.05
0.59
CITY ADM./CITY CLERK
13691.12
78484.33
129804.00
51319.67
0.60
ELECTIONS
0.00
1756.92
4460.00
2703.08
0.39
FINANCE
18615.68
120710.76
188032.00
67321.24
0.64
MOTOR VEHICLE
6090.33
40298.45
66884.00
26585.55
0.60
ASSESSING
2250.00
2250.00
19600.00
17350.00
0.11
LEGAL
2486.37
19520.25
32654.00
13133.75
0.60
PLANNING
91.91
1132.52
16475.00
'15342.48
0.07
•
CITY HALL
3583.97
23951.72
40537.00
16585.28
0.59
RECREATION BUILDING
8744.64
38968.63
51457.00
12488.37
0.76
POLICE DEPARTMENT
81231.27
439140.64
725058.00
285917.36
0.61
FIRE DEPARTMENT
12946.98
42018.08
82940.00
40921.92
0.51
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
3066.16
19461.69
36736.00
17274.11
0.53
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
8074.16
47839.67
77146.00
29306.33
0.62
CIVIL DEFENSE
52.21
151.91
850.00
698.09
0.18
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
FIRE MARSHALL
3772.08
25468.42
42630.00
17161.56
0.60
ENGINEERING
16734.59
106391.95
173056.00
66664.05
0.61
STREETS & ALLEYS
37922.73
186910.17
359065.00
172154.83
0.52
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
4854.74
35042.53
67150.00
32107.47
0.52
LIBRARY
644.78
45188.84
64223.00
19034.16
0.70
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
4681.47
27380.78
52191.00
24810.22
0.52
PARKiREC. ADMIN.
8214.34
49906.81
74616.00
24709.19
0.67
RECREATION
29493.48
86678.21
122100.00
35421.79
0.71
CIVIC ARENA
8443.69
70689.79
106996.00
36306.21
0.66
PARK DEPARTMENT
52557.94
215728.73
354245.00
138516.27
0.61
CEMETERY
5854.59
23048.93
41797.00
18746.07
- 0.55
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2158.57
18211.87
73700.00
15488.13
0.54
DEBT SERVICE
0.00
42296.10
62296.00
19999.90
0.68
AIRPORT
11438.03
33366.31
60650.00
27283.69
0.55
TRANSIT
7730.89
43271.80
82611.00
39339.20
0.52
UNALLOCATED
44623.57
156515.38
290309.00
1.3,3793.62
0.54
TOTAL
404440.23
2058096.34
3487967.00
1429870.66
0.59
4-a. (I)
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1986 JULY
JULY ENTERPRISE FUNDS
ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
JULY YEAR TO BUDGET REMAINING
LIQUOR FUND ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL 0,54
REVENUE REPORT 177842.03 0,59
31189.54 212157.97 125000.00 51254.07 0,56
14062.89 73745.93 260762.15
LIQUOR SALES 635000.00 274.75
64779.33 354237.85 0.00
WINE SALES 6B.46 -279.75 0,00 -21839.43
BEER SALES 4142.36 21839.03 5000.00
BEER DEPOSITS -439442..63 89 2790.42 0,00 1552.63
MISC. SALES -1552.63 0.57
INTEREST
00 492061.1
CASH DISCOUNTS 114295.86 662938.82 1155000.
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT 0.61
85616.14 139861.04 54044.86 0,3E
LIQUOR FUND 14762.59 4850.00 3010'58 0,6`,
187.57 1839.42 0,0"
13636.74 19737.66 30350.00 10612.32
PERS SERVICES 6650.00 8045.28 0,0
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE b04.72 2109.70
277.72 390.30 2500'00 0,0
OTHER SERVICES & CHAR6E 0.04 5110.00 5110'40 0.1
MISCELLANEOUS 0,00 0,00 40000.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY 0'!
DEBT SERVICE 0,04 20004.00 8735 0.4 0.4
15005.00 15005.04
TRANSFERS 80790.33 508815.59 673550.00 364734.4
0 00 0.ov
COST OF SALES 0.
OTHER
109674.95 637203.85 1189676.00 552672.15
TOTAL
REVENUE REPORT - WATER 0.00 0
SEWERIFUND 0,00 0.00 0
0.0�� 460004.00 201020,38
258979.6. 2670.00
38843.4 2330.00 5000.00
FEDERAL GRANTS 505.00 245000.00 94223.88
WATER SALES 16449 Bb 150776.12
�7 315717.39 615000.00 299202.61
WATER METER SALES
REFUSE SERVICES 43593•`' 317600.00 1090.22
24939.55 18`50`6.88 6300.00
SEWEk SERVICES ^-� ; 60000 00 58034.66
790.4. 5 40
EPA SALES 7973 12 21960.-4 . 0o� 00 10C
PENALTY CHARGES Q62.50 gg4.60 �15U.00 -712.49
INTEREST EARNpgURSEMENTS 25.00 662.49
REFUNDS & uSii.UO 794145.78
OTHER 936904.22 1731
13c48�.-9
TOTAL
CXENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWERIFUND
OPERATIONS
WATER
SEWER
TOTAL
'27462.5Q 1573424., 241ni)n,n0
2?4gti. 1« 2282511. i)8 711360.00
47611.16 466329. 1692.7`.00
b4 740015,00
g8563.76 951922.
12
63657.6ij
48310q.92
27=685•
640452.88
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, July 15, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Roland Ebent at 7:30 p.m.,
with the following members present: Shu -Mei Hwang, Thomas Lyke, Larry
Romo, Marlin Torgerson, Elsa Young and Chairman Ebent. Members absent:
Spencer Beytien. Also present: City Administrator Gary Plotz, Director
of Engineering Marlow Priebe, City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Monday, June 16, 1986. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUEST AS SUBMITTED BY HILLYARD, INC.
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the
reading of publication 33574 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
• on Thursday, July 3, 1986. The request is for a 20.3 variance to
allow the construction of a 50' by 100' building addition 4.7' from
the sideyard property line on property located at 425 California
Street.
Chairman Ebent noted that the planning staff recommendation was to
reject the variance as there are various other options for an
addition that would not require a variance.
Administrator Plotz added that there is still a reasonable use for
the property. For example, a 75' by 77' addition would give them
more square footage and meet the setback requirements.
Attorney Schaefer stated that in discussion with representatives of
Hillyard, they expressed their concern about the building
department encouraging them to apply for a variance as it was a
reasonable request and would be approved. They also stated that
the ordinance requirements for a variance will make it very
difficult for anyone to obtain a variance in the future.
It was pointed out that with the addition as proposed, they would
not be able to get equipment around the building without
trespassing onto adjoining property.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing.
• Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend to City Council the request be rejected as it doesn't
meet the statutory test (of reasonable use). Seconded by Mr. Ramo,
the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY SCHOOL
DISTRICT 1423
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3575 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, July 3, 1986. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the construction and operation of an elementary
school and playground on property located in an R-2 zone.
Superintendent Glenn Matejka and project architect, Mr. John
Korngiebel were present to explain the proposal. Chairman Ebent
noted staff concern about an on-site hydrant, emergency vehicle
roadway and an on-site drainage plan. Mr. Korngiebel responded
that he had spoken to Fire Marshal George Field and had agreed to
provide the necessary hydrant as well as put in an entrance at
the right rear and provide a paved way to entrances, one on each
end, for emergency vehicles. In regard to drainage, Mr. Korngiebel
responded that they do not have the site grading plan finished but
that the site will drain well. For the hard surfaces a catch basin
will be provided and roof drains will tie into the catch basin and
storm sewer system.
After discussion, Mr. Hwang made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 7:50 p.m. Mr. Hwang made a motion to
recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as •
requested. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY MARIE EWALD
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m, with the
reading of publication #3577 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, July 3, 1986. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the operation of a boarding and lodging home for
the elderly on property located in an R-2 zone.
Chairman Ebent noted staff concern about providing a registered
land survey showing location of buildings in order to determine if
there is room for adequate parking on the site. Mr. and Mrs. Henry
Ewald were present to explain the request. They had a survey of
the property, but it did not show the location of existing
buildings.
There was discussion of the parking situation. The five required
spaces as shown on the drawing were not acceptable due to the fact
that the spaces cannot be stacked behind one another. Two spaces
are counted for the double garage and two spaces outside of the
garage. Director Priebe explained that without a survey showing
existing buildings, it would not be possible to determine where
another space might be.
Mr. and Mrs. Joe Dansereau, owners of neighboring property at 45 •
and 47 Northwoods Avenue expressed their concern about the parking,
appearancewise. They also were concerned about how the interior
2
would be remodeled to accomodate the residents. Mr. and Mrs. Ewald
explained that the State department for licensing boarding and
• lodging homes had approved this house for 8 people. There would be
very little interior remodeling - only that requiredto meet fire
and building codes.
Chairman Ebent stated that he had received a call from Mr. Darrell
Haugen, neighboring property owner, who had some concern about the
proposal.
City Administrator Plotz expressed his concern is with the
intensity of the land use in an R-2. He stated that based on the
drawing provided the lots is less than 10,000 square feet required
for a duplex in an R-2 zone. He stated that the other two boarding
homes previously approved are located in commercial districts. Mr.
Ewald responded that the state would not license this site as
commercial.
There was discussion of the number of families allowed. City
City Attorney Schaefer explained that a family is any number of
related persons and up to 5 people if not related. Therefore, this
duplex can house up to ten unrelated people.
Mr. Romo stated that his concern was the parking. Putting in more
parking would not fit in with the character of the neighborhood.
There was discussion of granting the permit but stipulating number
• of residents and/or number of parking spaces, which would limit
the number of residents.
After further discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the
hearing. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the motion carried unanimously
and the hearing was closed at 8:27 p.m.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to reject the request due to the
density of use, due to size of lot and that it also lacks space
required for parking. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hwang.
Discussion followed. Mrs. Young stated she felt the applicants
should be given time to come up with a different plan showing
adequate parking, if possible. It was pointed out that they could
bring such a plan before the City Council who could overrule the
Planning Commission if they felt requirements were met. Mr. Romo
stated that he would prefer to approve the permit with limited
parking. After disuccsion, the motion passed with Mr. Romo, Mr.
Torgerson, Mr. Hwang and Mr. Ebent voting yes and Dr. Lyke and Mrs.
Young voting no.
(D) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS AS PETITIONED BY
RICHARD SCHMIDTBAUER
(Mr. Romo stated that he would not be taking part in the discussion
or action on this request due to interest in property.)
. Chairman Ebent opened the hearing at 8:30 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3578 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
request is for the vacation of I
and
1986. The req line of Lot •
Thursday, seme is lying on each side of
fline of Lot 2 and the north
th of said lots, Block 2. Orchard
utility ea�9nenof lot 2 and the south
the north 3 for the entire leng
line First
Lot lain the request. He
Park First Addition. resent to exp however, Mr.
lot easements,
Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer was P the utilities.
stated that theseu5edetwormo side nts by
lots for multiunit buildings and there
resent or future use for the easements
Schmidtbauer had
was no p problem with the vacation.
Seconded by Mrs.
Director Priebe stated that c closethehearing. was closed at
made a motion to and the hearing Council
Mr. Hwang motion to recommend to City
Young, the motion ca made a 'lot
us Y lied for by Mr'
8:35 p.m Mr. Hwnag the motion carried
approval of
the evacation of conded by Mr.n of a Torgerson, aPP
Schmidtbauer. #464 SECTION 7.09
unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
(E) missing a change
YARD SPACE ENCROACHMENTS publication was nded that the
that had been discussed and recomme
Director Priebe stated that the
about easementblished. August' Seconded by
notice be rep table until Aug
Torgerson made a motion to
Mr.
Hwang, the motion carried unanimously.
11
4 • OLDLD B
DISCUSS' has
OF RENTAL HOUSING REGISTRATION AS REQUESTED BY CI
(a) DISCO requested that
COUNCIL Council has req rental
the City and pursue a ointed
Chairman Eben t stated that During discussion it was.P needs
the Planning Commission continue to study.
of rental housing
housing registration ordiithce.similar types
for example) shouldsu99esteacthat the
out that various cities w It was intent o
(communities talh housingeregistrati p of the
regarding for the health and sa.stration will
approach be gradual. Administrator Plotz stated that t e It w`
p registration ointed out that such reg
rental housing reg landlords. After discussion,
occupants. It was further P rental housing
also be in the interest of th, to study few months before brings
the consensus of the tomo
registration over the course Of th lnext
a recommendation to the City
. NEW BUSINESS
5�—_
PROPOSED POLICE STATION olice �10
stated that the p
(a) PRESENTATION OF proposed P The
City Administrator Plotz
a site that adjoins residential property.
will be built on
2
ordinance requires a 50' setback from a residential zone. ISD #423
will apply to rezone a portion of two lots in an adjoining block
from R-2 to C-3 to allow for a parking lot. As rezoning these lots
is would also allow the construction of the proposed police station
without a variance, it is the recommendation of City staff to
rezone all of the remaining R-2 lots in those two blocks to
C-3.
Discussion followed. It was the consensus of the commission that
there is a definite trend toward commercial for those two blocks.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to set a public
hearing considering the rezoning of those lots from R-2 to C-3, for
August 19. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION OF EXISTING BOARDING HOME FOR THE ELDERLY/ NO C.U.
PERMIT
Director Priebe stated that some of the staff are aware of an
existing boarding home for the elderly located in an R-2 zone who
have not obtained a conditional use permit to allow operation.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion that the City
Attorney proceed with necessary action to bring operation into
compliance with City Ordinance. Seconded by Mr. Hwang, the motion
carried unanimously.
Chairman Ebent stated that he feels there is a lot of "gray area"
regarding the requirements for boarding homes for the elderly in
• residential zones. He asked staff to look into various
requirements and come up with some suggestions for making requirements more
6. ADJOURNMENT
•
There being no further business, Mr. Romo made a motion to adjourn the
meeitng. Seconded by Mrs. Young, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m.
5
BURNS MANCR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME
Minutes - July - 1986
• The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing
Home met Thursday July 24, 1986 at Burns Manor lower level meeting
area, 5:30 p.m., President Larry Graf presiding.
Members present: Larry Graf Gloria Dansereau
Esther Kuehl Jim Mills
John Mlinar Marge Putney
David Jensen Mavis Geier
Members absent: Archer Nelsen
Guests Present: Dan Tideman, Gary Grooters, Architects
Gary Nelson, Helgeson Development Co.
Russell Daak, Burns Manor
Congregate Care Facility
Dan Tideman and Gary Nelson discussed the possibility of
their company building, owning and managing a congregate care
facility on land adjacent to Burns Manor.
Discussion followed.
The meeting was called to order by Vice President Gloria
Dansereau.
MINUTES OF PAST MEETING:
• A motion was made by Jim Mills and seconded by Esther Kuehl
to approve the minutes with the following correction, Physician
of Minn. should read Physician Health Plan of Minn. All in favor.
Motion carried.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
A motin was made by Larry Graf and seconded by John Mlinar
to approve for payment the attached listing of accounts in the
amount of $38,798.50. All in favor. Motion carried.
A motion was made by Larry Graf to authorize payment of a
bill not included with the accounts payable, $60.00 to Ben Franklin,
(Material for pillows), seconded by John Mlinar. All in favor.
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL REPORT:
Financial report was given by David Jensen.
OLD BUSINESS:
A. Wall Protection: An easier to clean and less expensive
• wall material would be more desirable. Handrails can be refinished
and reused.
B. Air Conditioning: It is not economically feasible to
air condition the employee lunch room. /j
July Minutes
Page 2 not available to meet •
Dip BUSINESS CONTINUED: Dr gretzke was
Case Number 1008: 16 1986 pr. Kleinkauf
C. July meeting-
with
and Mavis Geier, Directors
with Larry August Board of representative met with
will be invited to the pHp
ee Health Insurance: retain
D. Em to 1986. The Administrator will
the employees July 15 0{ Hutchinson•
e with the City a under CIGNA
The employees have coverag
insurance coverage July 1, 1966•
E. CIGNA Insurance: In effect
Policy- The binder was Daak presented recommendations
insurance P Russell areas.
F. Air Conditioning resident dining part. of
the corridors and tate of Minn-
for air conditioning that Sue Jackson, that the
Mrs. Geier reported that
July 18> 1986)
plaints Office called Burns Manor stat n
Health Comp complaint that day the high humidity -
department received a wet and slippery due to
department -were SAF361-RC Sanyo Unit,
Burns Manor's floors included.
The air conditioning
unit recommended is
wiring is not
BTU capacity - 34,000/33,000 for $ Marge P ey
Discussion followed. _
Esther Kuehl and seconded
the most c ,
A motion was made by units, RC Sanyo
air conditioning equal to the SAF 361 -
to buy and install 2 good as
etitive price per unit, as 9
A11 in favor. Motion carried.
Unit• lot was discussed
NEW BUSINESS: Enlarging the rear parking
A. Parkin : ing-
included in future planning- Plan would like to adver-
and is to be physicians Health employees are
B. Adverb rovider and that the
tise that Burns Manor is a PHP P
d.
pHp Health Plan- Discussion Jim
Mile
participating in the
seconded by Jim Mills to
A motion was made by John Mlinar andfavor. Motion carried.
b pHp• All in A motion was made
approve advertisingEmylo ees Health Insurance: art time employees
C. Part Time that P full
seconded by John Mlinar
by Jim Mills and 10 ee is responsible for the
may enroll in PHP and each emp Y
cost of the premium- d
months probationary period and d
HEALTH INSURANCE ELIGIBILITY:
New Hire - after six
employment. to work.
eligible to continue - 6 months after return
Return from strike
July Minutes
Page 3
Return from lay off - 6 months after return to work.
(� Part time employee to full time employee - Eligible im-
mediately if employee has successfully completed probationary
period and is eligible for continued employment.
D. Quality Assurance Review Team: The State of Minn. Quality
Assurance Review Team will be assessing Burns Manor residents some-
time in August.
E. Goals and Objectives: These were not discussed this
month.
There being no further business Vice President Gloria Dansereau
adjourned the meeting.
The Burns Manor Board of Directors will meet Thursday August
21, 1986, 5:30 p.m. in the lower level meeting area.
ATTEST:
Gloria Dansereau, Vice President
11
Respectfully submitted:
Mav J. Ge r, secretary
(612) 587.5151
JWUJHTCHINSON,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 5535050
M E M 0 R A N D D M
DATE: August 26, 1986
TO: City Council
------------------------------
FROM Mayor Paul L. Ackland
SUBJECT: —Appointments to Employee Educational Incentive Committee —
1.
The two community representatives being recommended for appointment to
the Employee Educational Incentive Committee are:
• Dick Phillips
Roger Haggenmiller
I request ratification from the Council of their appointments.
0
EFFECTIVE SEPTEMER 12, 19814
i AFFIDAVIT
AM 00 65 YEARS
OF AGE, OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN:
FAMILY SIZE INCOME
1 $7,000
2 $8,500
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $8.60 OR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE WOULD
IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION
OF THE CHARGE TO $1,50,
To: WATER DEPARTMENT
DATE
DATA CHANGE
To: CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL ACTION
i
ACCOUNT NLfSER
DATE
APPROVED DISAPPROVED
1tL'PAIL "UN SALL P
mate of glimics;ota,
COOXTY OF.__._McLeod ,____._...__..__ CitYF.__Hutchinson
y
To the...................Lit........Council ................................of the........,.City ..............................of....Hutchinson
....................................
. ............................... State of Minnesota:
St. _Ana s tas.i a' s_. Chy.CCtl_—_._—_------_
hereby appl_1R.1/,, a license for the term of ._one.. cUiy ------ .._.....
from the.____..__21_S t.__.__. _ da o SePIEmbE2_ --_, I9_8_6 , to sell
At Retail Only, Non -Intoxicating blalt Liquors,
as the same aro de fined by law, Jor eonte.mption ••01,.•• these certain prem_eu in the
Cit f Hutchinson
ducrtbrd a. follows, - 4
M AUG 19P6
Fall Festival n
St.. Anastasia's Church — PAID o
Lake Street �'�®Bufcximunti
n
al which place sold applieanl._..nperate......the business of.
and to that rnd represent..... and state ... as follows
That said applicant_.___......i5.._.._... ............... _... _..cltixn._..... of the UrUted States; of food moral character
and repato; and ha_._._ -attained the ate of 21 yeah; that ........_______ ...._......._...._.._....._.._... proprietor....._.of the
establishment for which the license will be issued if thio application is trantrd.,
That no manufaetarer of such ran-intxiralint malt liquors has any ownership, in whole or in part,
in said businns of said applicant.__or any interest therein;
That said applicant......malu._... this application pursuant and subject to all the laws of the State of
Minnesota and the ordinances and retulations of
applicable thereto, which aro hereby mode a part hereof, and hereby atree--- to obseroe and obey the same;
/� / ra.n NY eWr ,sdnm.sV a w. d lod ,.eeWlm,t
,W/(�yyNY�IWs�.N CIw7A7.>,f �1 wt.Nt � QA,,Pw_
Y— K4.,Q,�
Each applioant further states that he is not now the holder of, nor has he mode a;: r'ieation for, na.-
does he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealers Special ta.s stamp for the snle of
Ln oxicatint liquor.
Dated. -
dpplloant_ -
P. O.
•
•
0
��p�g67891p��
9j 9�s
City of Hutchinson
4r APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE Approved by:
Building
Fire AA e
Application shall be submitted at Police A�-b�
least _ days prior to the Gambling occasion
Sf 4^i5 �S//� �,9Fj/SymLC fE5Tj"z-
I , .�iur e Z .19 - rkPLui'96Z _ AND I , e Z._
Name of Auth&iized Officer of Name of Desi-gAated Gaming
Organization Manager
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct
the game of bingo in accordance with the provisions of the City of
Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349
for the license year ending
Sig atures:
AuthorizedOf er of Organization Designated G ing Manager of
organization
A
The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer
of the organization:
1. True Name: Z-1E6KF UND dAICE LE/F
(last) (first)/ /(middle)
2. Residence Address: 35-ZAkE///5;�/. •///j
/ /YthI.VjyU
(street) (city) (state) (zip)
3. Date of Birth: / 38 4• Place of Birth
(mo/day/year) (city/state)
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No >e,'_. If Yes, explain
B. The
following is to be completed by
the designated gambling manager
of
organization:
1.
True Name: ZTERKE401ZID
�,ZE
� /f
(last)
(first)//
(middle)-
2.
Residence Address: J` S L.C�arlilga
Ll�NE
fi'L- lf4 oo niti 3�
(street)
(city)
(state) (zip)
3.
Date of Birth: // 3 4•
Place
of Birth:
(mo/day/year)
(city/state)
C.
crime other than a
convicted of any If yes, explain
5 ever been Yes N°
Have you '
traffic offense. z
member of the organization?
Kaye you been a official action
6. xow long the official resolution or
of
T, Attach pyou gambling manager*
designatingY R�Sf�
Game Information: will be used
where gambling devices
devices will be used day(s)
1• Place (date and/or
dates gambling of week)
2• Date or be used:
the day gambling devices will
3• gouts of To (1�— P.M.
From i / A.M.2 • Al
Maximum
number of players
money or merchandise? the gambling
4• aid in time well charge
during the e
5• Will pr=yeS be P served If so.
Yes �_ No NO
6, Will refreshments e
will be used. Yes —
devices such refreshments.
be made for
Information' meetings are held
D. Organization alar c of the
1. Address where reg the laws
Day and time of meetings Son organs ed under ,�n,lO
2. licant organl28�_ No l`�`
3• Is to ofPMinneSota? Yes tion been in existence?
State the organize 5th
How long has n the organization?
4' members i tion?
4a. How many purpose of the organize
What is the Title
5• the Organization
6• Officers of Address
Name
Fany other persons Paid for serve
of officers or Title
tovtheames organization: Address
Name
D. Organization Information: (Continued)
• 8. In whose custody will organization records be kept?
Name Brucz L. dr co. AAn Address 53 1Ilk -E ryJ ZeVF-
9. If the organizati n carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by players
while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed
premises, please state the Re61rf Sorry l aF ,Orrlerica-
Name of Insurer�7 06.6 �%t ¢i/QL and Policy No. /� /2-052 A
10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices?
11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization.
E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity
bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization.
1. Name of bonding company eQ 1k zla �i�ahtQ
2. Address of bonding company
3. Amount and duration of bond
• 4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding
requirements. Yes No _X,
I declare that the information I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling,
and I will familiarize myself with the contents thereof.
oz eAnrwrizea oiiicer
Date:_
bad.aad..z4orn to before -4e a notary public on this a5� day of
RLY SCHAE6�x0G est
y wor uc-MNNMTA Signature Notary Public
McLEODCOUNTY Commission expires on
My Oam glowri ----------
u scri a and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of
19
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
Social Security
Number:
.
MN Business ID
Number:
65-6/-7
V90
0i; ty of I:utc'':-., on
g9d 1U2
Feet 0.00 APPLICATION FOR BI; GO LIC.::SE =-_ r o' ec b�'=
j� = 3- ng /---
w
�^ Application shall be submitted at least Police
days prior to the bingo occasion
5/Asm pw/sa{ �a� F�sT/aqC /f p
I, C rlA( k , ck& &zr AND I. S/ ./Ce_ �.
Name OI Allt'nOfififi333sed Officer Name of De natec 3ingo %.FnFFEr
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct
the game of bingo in accordance with the provisions of City of
Hutchinson Ordinance No. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 for
the license year ending
Signatures:
Authorized Of r of Organization Designated go ;ar_ager
A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer
of the organization:
1. True Name: midale
• ,", last firs �)
2.:= Residence Address:1z�/F tc&AUL mN
4 tree P(city) state) (zip cone')
3. Date of Birth: // 4- Place of Birth it & state
(m y (year)
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes NO 2!�_. If yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo manager
of organization:
1. True Name: LZAC
r��<+ (first) middle)
K
3
Residence Address: _
street) (city) 5 6 EL t"Uj
Date of Birth: f� 4 Place of Birth:
OWi� MAI
(M a & year)
Have you ever been convicted of any crime
offense? Yes NO 'k._. If yes, explain
(cdty& statE
other than a traffic
• 6. How long have you been a member of the organization?
7. Attach a copy of the official resoluticr, or official action
designating you bingo manager.
C, Ca --e information:
1. Place where bingo €aures will be piayedS� OWN57V4 JOK&2
2. Date or dates bingo will be played 91-2.118eo
(date'ana/or days) of :eeZ
3. Hours of the day bingo will played: From // A.M. to 10
tmx• P.M.
4. Maximum number of players .306
5• Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise?
6. Will refreshments be served during the ti=e the games are
being conducteaa Yes C No If so, will a c:narge be
Lade for such refreshments? Yes_ NO
D. Organization Information:
1.
Address where regular meetings are held 46o LJQK
2.
Day and time of meetings r -'L n
3.
Is the applicant organization organized under the
laws of the
state of Minnesota? Yes
4,
how long has the organization been in existence?
/40yPa._✓_J
4a.
How many members in the organization?
5,
'What is the purpose of the organization? /f/1
6.
Officers of the Organization:
•
Name Address
Title
I— �nrn�i /.t/L,Mnnin/ - AWI.dKF_ S'/:
)4 &a
7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services
to the organization:
Name Address Title
Social Security Number: © /� }�
MN Business ID Number: 85-67990
E
•
•
L�
D. Omani zation In'c_.-a tion r, GLi,°4 nueC)
E.
In whose custody will c:•=anization reccras
be }:ept?
Name 8rUc.c l_ Ag`�ger eliovy ( Address j35_L}jkE�llEul
LIQ
9.
If the organization carries sufficient
_assurance to co=pensate
the players in the event any injury is
sustained by players was=
participating in the bingo game, or while
on the licensed
premises, please state the
Name of Insurer and Policy
No. P(J- 1951tea✓
(24flk0LI( 416iFa46 RE(_IEF Soeir7rl D7P
10.
Have you (;tanager & Officer) read, and
do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws,
crainances, and
regulations governing the operation of
bingo games?
11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization.
E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity
bond given by the bingo manager in favor of the organization:
1. Name of bonding_ company
2. Address of bonding company Cbrne,.!lq , d)ig1q As KA '
3. Amount and duration of bond Z44 -6a
Q. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding
requirements. Yes No ?4
I declare that the information I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance NO. 655 relating to bingo.
and I will familiarize myself,.yith the contents thereof.,
Signature of, a4tfijFri zed officer of organiza
Date:
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this
Day of �,, 19%�10 .
- j
Signature IQ4 Notary Public
MERLYSCHAEFER Commission expires on
J► WTMY PUsUC - MVM*WTA '
sp n to before me a notary public on this
19
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 1986 AND
THURSDAY, AUGUST 21, 1986
0 PUBLICATION NO. 3607
NOTICE OF REARING ON FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota will meet on Tuesday, August 26, 1986 at 8:00 P.M. at City Hall,
37 Washington Avenue West, in Hutchinson, Minnesota for a federal revenue
sharing budget hearing. The purpose of the hearing is for citizen review of
the proposed use of funds from federal revenue sharing.
The budget as proposed for 1986 is as follows:
General Fund Revenues - Other $2,932,973
Federal Revenue Sharing
Revenues Available
Cash Balance 12/31/85 $378,150
Entitlement No. 17 156,844
Interest Earning 20,000
Total General Fund 3,487,967
isGeneral Fund Expenditures 2,932,913
Proposed Federal Revenue Sharing Expenditures
Public Safety Expenditure - General Fund 554,994
$3,487,967
Details of the above budgets are available for public inspection at City
Hall between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Monday through Friday.
All interested citizens' groups, senior citizens and senior citizen
organizations are encouraged to attend the hearing. Persons attending the
hearing shall have the right to provide written and oral comments and sugges-
tions regarding the proposed budgeted use of revenue sharing funds.
Dated: August 13, 1986
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Kenneth B. Merrill
Asst. City Clerk
�Q
(612) 587-5151
Har�H' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON37 EST
HUTCHINSON, MINN,NN5 350
AUGUST 22, 1986
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
--------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: FININACIAL REPORT BY CITY AUDIT FIRM CHARLES BAILLY
--------------------------------------------------------------
Representatives from the city's audit firm of Charles Bailly
& Co. will be present to review the 1985 audited finiancial
statements. Please bring the financial report which is contained
• in this packette with you for this review on Tuesday.
Charles Bailly & Company
Certified Public Accountants
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
As part of our examination of the financial statements of the City of
Hutchinson for the year ended December 31, 1985, we studied and evaluated the
City's system of internal accounting controls. Because the study and
evaluation was only part of an overall audit plan regarding the financial
statements, it was not intended to he a complete review of all your acounting
procedures and, therefore, would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in
the system. However, we did observe the following conditions, which are not
considered material weaknesses, and offer these comments and suggestions for
changes or improvements in your controls and procedures.
•' PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
we again recommend that a general fixed asset ledger be maintained. The
council should adapt a dollar "cut off" point for items to be included in the
ledger. This record will result in increased control over City property. In
addition, depreciation schedules for enterprise funds could be set up on a
computer. This would result in more accurate financial reporting.
COMPETITIVE BIDDING
As part of our audit we selected a few bid files to determine compiance with
various laws and regulations. In two instances the lowest bid was not
accepted but the reasons were not disclosed in the minutes. The reasons were
satisfactorily explained to us, but a record should also be maintained in the
minutes.
CASH CONTROL
With City operations at various outlying areas, we recommend that controls
over cash be specifically reviewed and additional controls be implemented as
necessary. These controls and transaction procedures should be identified
in a policy manual and updated as required by changing circumstances.
GENERAL
As noted in last year's letter, the City staff performed more analysis in
several areas. This resulted in audit effeciencies in those areas and
allowed us more time to cover the requirements of the Single Audit Act.
Their help was MUCH appreciated.
We appreciate the opportunity to present these comments and suggestions
which are solely for the use of City administration. This letter does not
express an opinion on the City's overall internal control system. It does,
however, include items which we believe merit your consideration. We can
discuss these matters further at your convenience and provide any
implementation assistance for changes or improvements you may require.
4,� 4t- "", �
Certified Public Accountants
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 25, 1986
(612) 587-5151
11my-11 CITY OF HUTCHINSON
•37 WASN'NGTON AVENUE 'WEST
% / NUTCHI,NSON, %4]NN. 55350
•
M E M O
DA'Z'E: August 20, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: George F. Field, Fire Marshal
RE: Fire Instructors Association Fall Conference and Chiefs Conference
Requesting authorization to attend the two conferencesabove-referenced.
Registration information regarding each conference is attached.
GFF/pv
attachment
`%Nsr FALL F
h Y
oa i
SAT. SUN. `�E t . 4� ^ 21, 1988 ,}
-' 6 : _ at
BECKER & MOWICELLO w
(Centrally located In Minnesota just east of St. cloud.) M r
11
IF YOU'RE IN FIRE FIGHTING, WE HAVE A CLASS FOR YOU!
F.I.A.M. offers, to their members and the fire department personnel of Minnesota, a fall
conference in Becker and Monticello (centrally located in the state) and a wide selection
of classes to choose from. Make a couple of selections and send in your registration
early. Don't miss out on the $5.00 discount offered for a book carried by F.I.A.M. This is a
good way to increase your library at the fire half.
REGISTRATION: $20.00 ($26.00 at the door or after Sept. 6, 1986.)
Early registration is $5.00 off the purchase price of any book carried by F.I.A.M.
Make checks payable to: F.I.A.M. and send to: Ted Form[[[a 524 E, 3rd SV.Pet . , A ont cello, MN 55362
LIST OF CLASSES USING:
BEING OFFERED ON
BACK OF FLYER.
41.
Conference Headquarters:
MonticeNa Fir* Statioti; 612 295-4� t f
Don't miss the chance to get
together and share iriea8. Also.
there will be a FILM FEST at the
Moniicalb fire station on Friday
evening.
' Phone t�12i 295-4700
`j • •"`�"' (Prices trots[ X28 OO to $38.90)
i
Bast W5 IFox Inn
: 4000
".0o)
Comfort Inn
?hone (412) 2 9§-1,111
X29.00 so 936.00)
fAfention ) I A M Cor.I when !eg,Ver•ng
Ladies!
Saturday, in Becker, there will be a tour of the green house at the Shercc
'ower Plant and on Sunday we will have a stress management class of a
fire rghter's home at 9 a.m.
FLEA MARKET IN MONTICELLO
(Saturday and Sunday)
T'S SEE YOU AT THE CONFERENCE!
REGISTRATION FORM
1Ge o I r 1 cl 1 1 F ie 1'd
FIRST NAME LAST NAME
FIRE DEPARTMENTi 7
H u ti c h i nl s o; n. I I I
TELEPHONE 612 5 8 7- 5 1 5 1 5 B 7 - 8 3 0 1
AREA CODE WORK PHONE HOME PHONE
COUNTY STATE ZIP CODE
MY SPOUSE WILL ATTEND Q HER FIRST NAME I J e a n e t t o
PLEASE REGISTER ME FOR THE FOLLOWING WORKSHOP (SELECT ONE):
FIRECHIEF
COMMAND
PRIMER INCIDENT
CREATIVE
HGMT.
6
FIRE CODE ENFORCEMENT/ CONPUTERS IN FIRE CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS
PREVENTION - 6 HRS. F� SERVICE - 3 HRS. 3 HRS.
F7
HAZARD MATERIALS ElFIRE SERVICE
3 HRS. SUPERVISOR - 3 HRS.
MY SPOUSE WILL ATTEND THE LADIES' LUNCHEON ON OCT. 17TH. (PRE -REGISTRATION REQUIREDT
YEy
• =,
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION IS $95.00. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
1986 STATE FIRE CHIEF'S CONFERENCE
600 WEST 95TH ST.
BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420
0
r
L
A 12) 587-5151
TY OF HUTCHINSON
August 19, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: HAZEL SITZ
RE: TRANSIT OCNFERENCE REGISTRATION
I request authorization to attend the 1986 Fall Public Transit
Conference on September 17 and 18. This is a budgeted item.
Registration is $70 plus housing and transportation. Agenda
attached. Conference is at Radisson Metrodorm, Minneapolis.
CONFERENCE wrellmtmur sebedolel
Wednesday, September 17
18:30 a.m: 12:00 noon Cmatiornee Meg atratlou,
12:00 noon IAS p.m. Luueheoe
H'eltrome by Qty a Minnes poll,
Opening Bemarb
1:302:45 p.m. I..040the Musa 1hr IOHT
Sele Toplabyfour8utel.eglda,ma
8:15.1:30 p.m. Outlook For Transit Funding
Federal Program-Minnesou
Congressional Smlf
State Outlook Minne.om Smile
Eronomist
,Wal pereprcdve-League of ailnnesnm
Cities
5:tlo-6:30 p.m. eoilal Hour
Heoeption at We Hubert H. Humphm
Publk Affairs Center on We l-nlversin'
ol-Minnesou Campus Tours of W,
Hubert H. Humphm Polith-W
Mua,mn and Public Mal. Center.
6:45-8:30 p.m. Annual Awards Banquet and
Kewy d Address
Thursday, September 18
B4O"30... c flRealal `aks.l
0:3011:So .m.
Coreurreat IRdtplh workshops
8:30-8:45...
workstaw I
'Your strategic La'
10:1511:45 a.m.
John Johnson h Aandaus Planning and
Management Cawtlunu
Workshop fl
'Cult .,WalydwNarhn8egnem&Umisod
11 4S12:IX1 noon
Po to nimr
Kathy Garner Chadvtck, PHU, ltniremity of
Minnesum, Schmi of Management
11:30 IM p.m.
Luneheon
Hosted by We Mlnssou Chapur, Womens'
Transportation grammar
1:152:15 p.m.
The Stan, a We Art of Peaonal Compumm
A demonstration of the newest and best in
hardwu'e and sdtvare systems by
Bualneealand. Ice.
2:4.7,4:45 p.m.
ctosrurent worluhept
wmkssop In
'Burmese Engeh Hain. for Manager%
Dashe h Thompaos,lmmiaM, writing
Conmulunu
workshop iv
�,naa mrllratiotn fir C nfhrt Management"
5:3P7:30p.m.
Reception
Ho. In, We Department of Transporration
Engneermng at the underground Civil and
Miners] Engineering Building, University of
Minnonts,E tBook C mlas.
Friday, September 19
&(30-630...
ContineuW rakhot
8:30-8:45...
Defining PrhstMtlon a" Cwpethion
in if. bosinonsNPubHe TYaedt.
10:1511:45 a.m.
10111.0011 and [And Warr E aaa l
Keung in on Pant, Trends
4nit EnrBeou, PHU. FuturlsL Praidenr
innnitp. Ltd.
11 4S12:IX1 noon
Confe enee Clewing
T.�u#r4insnn Ambatigabors
45 WASHINGTON EAST
HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
T0: Hutchinson City Council �°
From: Bob Reichow a U ,1986 v
Subject: 12th Annual Arts & Crafts Festival N ?r-E.IVED
Date: August 14, 1986 _ v
`o. 3t'..._.._._._._... A)
The Hutchinson Ambassadors and the Hutchinson Area Chamber ySbEZ
of Commerce are again sponsoring the upcoming 12th Annual
Arts & Crafts Festival. The event is being held September
19 and 20. As of date, current registrations indicate the
success of this cummunity event.
At this time, we would like to request the use of the Library
Square Park for the above dates. Also, we ask that exclusive
authority be granted in regards to entertainment, food concessions,
ani—Ariss and Gratts ex i Etions.
Thank you for your time and attention to this request.
aaj;'cj�
Bob Reichow
BR/klb
0
ORDINANCE NO. 20/86
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 710:10 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ENTITLED "STOP STREETS"
BY ADDING SUBDIVISION NO. 20 THERETO, RELATIVE TO
"TRAFFIC, LOCAL REGULATIONS"
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Section 710:10 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of the City of
Hutchinson, entitled "Stop Streets" is hereby amended by adding thereto Sub-
division No. 20, which shall be as follows:
Subd. No. 20. That the following named street to -wit:
California Street North at the intersection of School
Road North and the same is hereby declared, established
and made a stop street.
• Section 2. Penalty. Any person violating the provisions of this ordi-
nance shall be guilty of a penal offense and upon conviction shall be pun-
ished by a fine of not more than three hundred dollars ($300) or by imprison-
ment for not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Cl
RESOLUTION NO. 8365
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
4" Water
85WP-208
--Ask -
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
EM I
Meter
Polymer
COST
1,130.0
5,691.6
PURPOSE
DEPT.I
BUDGET
VENDOR
Resale/Replacement
Sludge Chemical
Water
Sewer
Yes
Yes
Water Products, Inc.
Nalco Chemical Co.
ITEM
Date Approved:
•Motion made by:
Seconded by:
COST
PURPOSE I DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR
t 26, 1986 Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
r� n
(612) 587-5151
;v�rcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 22, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Ralph Neumann
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Unicom Radio for Airport
------------------------------
At the last Airport Commission meeting, it was suggested that
$1000.00 be included in the budget for a new Unicom Radio.
I have contacted the State of Minnesota regarding their
participation in a 2/3 - 1/3 purchase which they will approve.
• I have received 2 bid quotes for $855.00 and $900.00 installed.
Because we have money available in this years budget, I recommend
we enter into this agreement now at a city cost of $285.00
•
7-2,
•
•
daNNE�rq
�i y0
FyT y'P
OF !R
August 7, 1986
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Ralph Newmann
City Hall
37 West Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Mr. Newmann:
Subject: State Aid Agreement
Unicom Radio
Hutchinson Municipal Airport
Phone -296-0745
In answer to your telephone request for assistance in obtaining a new
Unicom Radio for your airport, attached are four copies of a state aid
agreement. Please have the documents signed by the proper city officials
and return all copies to this office. Also include a resolution from
the city council authorizing the signing of the agreements. A sample
is attached.
Include a price quotation from two vendors for the radio that you want.
When the agreements have been fully executed and the funds encumbered,
we will give you authorization to purchase the radio. Send a copy of
the cancelled check used for payment and we will reimburse you for our
share of the cost.
If there are any questions, please call or write
you in this improvement to your airport.
incer y,
Do as E. Jo on
Electrical Engineering Assistant
Aeronautics Division
Room 417
cc:
Jim Groehler
We are glad to assist
Ars Equa( Opporvunr(c Emplover 7-2.
Mn/OOT TP -06112•03 (e/aa) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AERONAUTICS DIVISION
�_- 417 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155
• P14ONE: (612) 2!&8202
.. AGREEMENT FOR STATE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT
Municipality Hutchinson
State Project No. 4304-06
Federal Project No.
Contract No. 1871
This agreement is between the State of Minnesota, hereafter referred to as State, by and through its Commissioner of
Transportation, hereafter referred to as Commissioner, and the Ci t,y of Hutchi n, -,nn ,
hereafter referred to as Municipality. (city, county, Municipality, Airport commission)
WHEREAS, the Municipality desires the financial assistance of the State for t.hp : urchasp of a Unicom
hereafter referred to as project, for its airport; and
WHEREAS, the State is authorized by Minn. Stat. is 360.015 and 360.305 and is willing and agrees to provide financial
assistance to the Municipality for improvement of its airport; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality has provided the Commissioner with the plans, specifications, and a detailed description
of the airport improvement project which the Commissioner has approved;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
1. The Municipality shall complete the project as approved and any changes in the plans or specifications of the project
subsequent to the date of this Agreement are subject to prior approval by the Commissioner.
2. Work necessitated by the project will start on or before September 10 1 986 , and shall be completed no later
• than O(--t.nhpr 1 r 1 9R6 , in accordance with the plans and specifications as approved by the Commissioner.
3. The estimated project cost is; . The proportionate shares of the total project cost are
Federal 0 , State 2/ , and Municipal 1/3 and the State's obligation shall not exceed
$ X0.00 In the event Federal reimbursement becomes available or is increased for this project,
the State shall be entitled to Withhold from such Federal funds an amount not to exceed the State share of this
Agreement. No funds are committed under this Agreement until they are encumbered by the Minnesota Department
of Finance.
4. The Municipality shall make disbursemgnts on a work progress basis for which certified cost estimates shall be sub•
mitted to the Commissioner on forms prescribed by the Commissioner. The State will reimburse the Municipality
for proportionate shares of the approved project costs to be paid with state and federal funds.
5. For an approved project which involves the purchase of equipment, the Municipality will be reimbursed by the
State in one lump sum after the Municipality A) has acquired both possession and unencumbered title to the
equipment and 8) has presented to the State paid invoices and a certificate that the equipment is not defective
and is in good working order. The Municipality shall keep the equipment for which it is reimbursed under this
Agreement properly stored, in good repair, and shall not use said equipment for any purpose other than airport
operations.
6. Where the Municipality represents and shows that the project involves work of such a nature that it is inadvisable to
contract for this work and where the State approves, the work will be done in accordance with the schedule of
prices established by the Municipality and set forth in the attached exhibit which is made a part of this Agreement.
7. The Municipality shall operate and maintain the municipal airport as a licensed, municipally -owned public airport
at all times of the year for a period of twenty years from the date the Municipality receives final reimbursement.
under this Agreement. The Municipality furtheragrees that it will not sell, mortgage, lease, assign, abandon, use for
other than airport purposes, or in any way transfer any of the Municipality's interest in the airport or in any real
or personal property which is purchased or imprdved with state aid funds without prior approval of the State, and
then such transfer or use may be made subject to such conditions as the State may designate at that time.
• 6. If the Municipality fails to comply with the terms of this Agreement, the State may terminate it upon 30 days written
notice to the Municipality, and the Municipality will return upon demand to the State the amounts received hereunder
together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of payment.
9. The Municipality presently has available sufficient unencumbered funds to pay its share of the project, and it shall
be responsible in the execution of this Agreement that all provisions of its municipal charter and applicable state and
federal laws have been strictly followed.
10. The Municipality shall maintain such records and provide such information on request of the State so as to permit the
the Department of Transportation, the Legislative Auditor, or the State Auditor to examine those books, records, and
accounting procedures and practices of the Municipality relevant to this contract pursuant to Minn. Stat. 116.095.
11. The Municipality shall save and hold harmless the State from any claims, liabilities, or damages including but not
limited to costs and attorneys' fees arising out of the project which is the subject of this Agreement.
12. The Municipality agrees that it shall not utilize any state or federal financial assistance received pursuant to this
Agreement to compensate either directly or indirectly any contractor, corporation, partnership, or business however
organized, which is disqualified or debarred from entering into or ,eceiving a Minnesota Department of Transportation
contract. This restriction applies regardless of whether the disqualified or debarred party acts in the capacity of a
general contractor, a subcontractor, or as an equipment or material supplier. This restriction shall not prevent the
Municipality from utilizing funds hereby provided to pay any party who might be disqualified or debarred subsequent
to its contract award on this project by the Municipality.
1. MUNICIPALITY
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
3. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Assistant Commissioner, Aeronautics
Date:
Distribution: Original —Finance
Copy t —Municipality
Copy 2 — Aeronautics
2. Approved as to Form & Execution
Special Assistant Attorney General
4. COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
Signature
Date:
5. COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE
Authorized Signature
Date:
•
•
0
• RESOLUTION NO. 8367
RESOLUTION FOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PSD STATE FOR PURCHASE OF UNICOM RADIO
RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Administrator be and the same are
hereby authorized and directed to execute the MN/DOT contract No. 1871 ,
Agreement for State Financial Assistance for Airport Improvement, on behalf
of said City of Hutchinson and to execute and affix their signatures to any
and all further required documents pertinent thereto and all amendments
thereof.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
• Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
S E A L
40
•
•
0
Appendix 3
RESOLUTION NO. 8368
CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION
TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATIONS
Be it resolved that:
1) Hutchinson, MN, City Council act as sponsoring unit of government for the
project titled Hutchinson Community Energy Council Small Business Energy
Program to be conducted during the period Fall 1986 to Fall 1987. The
City Administrator is hereby authorized to apply to the Minnesota
Department of Energy and Economic Development for funding of this project
on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
2) The City of Hutchinson enter into a grant agreement with the State of
Minnesota for the project named above if the application is successful.
The City Administrator is hereby authorized to execute certifications as
required and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the
project named above.
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson on
(Date)
SIGNED•
(Signature)
tle
(Date)
wTTNRSSRne
(Signature)
Title
Date
0
Ll
40
Item: C-Anmmity Energy Council (CEC) Grant and Program
Contents: Program Sumary
Budget
Resolution
Council Approve resolution authorizing submission of grant
Action: application and, if funded, execution of grant contract
Fiscal $1500 donation by the City to the program. Also consideration
Impact: of establishing a business energy loan fund: amount not
yet deternuned
I
•MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
900 American Center
150 East Kellogg Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55101
APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL GRANT
FY 87 - Cycle 1
1.1 Name and address of Applicant Unit(s) of Government:
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
1.2 Lead Applicant for Grant Administration
City of Hutchinson
•
1.3 Contact Person:
Name Butch Wentworth, CEC Chairman
Title Electric Superintendent, Hutchinson Utilities
Street 225 Michigan Avenue
City Hutchinson
State/Zip MN 55350
Phone (612)587-4746
ALSO Paul Ackland, Mayor, Gary Plotz, City Administrator,
City Hall, 37 Washington Ave W., Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612)587-5151
•
1.4 Name of Community Energy Council(s) and Date(s) Established. (On a
separate sheet attach a list of Community Energy Council members and
their relevant affiliations, if any. Also attach a copy of the
resolution(s) establishing the Community Energy Council(s):
Hutchinson Community Energy Council
Established March 31, 1986
(See Appendix 1 - Resolution Establishing CEC)
1.5 Project title: Hutchinson Community Energy Council Small Business Energy
Program
1.6 Project Abstract (A short summary of project information in sections
2.1-2.4)
(See Attached)
1.7 Proposed Funding:
a. Community Energy Council Grant Funds Request $15,000
b. Local Match
Indicate whether
Source Cash or In -Kind Amount
•
Local match total
TOTAL PROPOSED FUNDING
1.8 To the best of my knowledge and belief, data in this application are true
and correct, and submission of this application has been duly authorized
by the governing body or bodies of the application(s).
Signature of authorized official Typed name and title Date signed
(Attach a copy of the resolution or resolutions authorizing submission of
this application. A sample resolution is enclosed).
2.3 • WOjWLAN
MONTH
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
NOV DEC 86 JAN 87 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
- Set up Loan Fund
- Detailed design of
workshops
- Individual consultation
visits
- Walkthrough audits
- More extensive audits
DEMONSTRATION
- Business audits (6)
PROMOTION
- News articles
- TV, radio as appropriate
- Speaking to clubs
WORKSHOPS
- 2 hours on general con-
servation in businesses (4)
PARTICIPANT SOLICITATION
- At speaking engagements
- At workshops
- Person to person, door to
door as necessary
INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS CONSUL-
TATIONS, REFERRALS,
RECOMMENDATIONS
- Initial visits
- Infrared analysis
- Specialized workshops
WALKTHROUGH AUDITS
WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
MORE EXTENSIVE AUDITS
LOAN APPLICATIONS
EVALUATION - Determination
of energy efficiency
investments and
installation
X - - - - - X
X - - - - - - - X
X - - X
X - - - - - X (some on-going)
X X X X
X- - - - - - X
X- - - - - - - X
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
•
10 11 12
AUG SEPT OCT
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X X - - - - - - -
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
ADMINISTRATION X-------------------------------------- - - - - - X
• 0 •
3.0 BUDGET
Other Sources
Cartmunity Energy Indicate whether
EZenditure Catetor_v Council Grant (S) Name Amount cash or in-kind Total
A. Salaries and mages l 14,000 City 11000 Cash 15,000
B. Fringe Benefits I(
C. In-state travel 700 1
and training
D. Space rental and
utilities
E. Rental and lease of
equipment
F. Consumable supplies
G. Telephone
H. Postage
I. Printing and printed
materials 300
J. Insurance
R. Consultant and
contract services
(describe in detail)
L. Other (describe in
detail)
TOTALS
15,000
City
500 1
Cash
1,200
Hutch Utilities
1,200
In-kind
1,200
Hutch Utilities
600
In-kind
600
Hutch Utilities
420
In-kind
420
Hutch Utilities
200
In-kind
200
300
Hutch Utilities In-kind
Hutch Utilities 2,500 3 In-kind
CE]C Fees 5,000 Cash 7,500
Hutch Utilities 31000 5 In-kind 3,000
City Loan Fund
C
14,420
29,520
•
•
0
3.0 Budget
NOTES
1. In -State
Travel (c)
Total $1200
DEED
$700
Training and travel
expenses
City
500
Local Mileage: 200
miles/mo X 12 months
2. Consultant and Contract Services
Total $7500
Hutchinson Utilties is donating consultation services to businesses on
the recommendation of the energy coordinator. This will primarily be for
utility bill analysis and advice on demand and power factor charges. It
may also include help in conducting workshops or help in dealing with
individual needs.
100 hours X $25/hr. = $2500
3. In addition, the energy council may retain the services of a commercial
auditor/engineer to assist the energy coordinator in complex questions,
to review walk-through audit recommendations and perhaps to conduct in
depth audits. The energy council is budgeting $5,000 for this item which
will be collected as revenue from fees of about $100 to 50 businesses who
elect to have more thorough auditing. Fees and audit costs would be
eligible for loan funds as part of an energy efficiency loan:
100 to 200 hours of $25 to $50/hour = $5,000
4. Other Total $3000
Hutchinson Utilities would provide infra -red photography and analysis of
heat loss on up to 75 businesses the first year. The cost is valued at
$40 per business. Since this method does not work well when the
temperature exceeds 30 degrees F., requests exceeding 75 businesses would
be put on a waiting list for next year. Also the utility may begin this
service on some businesses prior to the initial consultation by the
energy coordinator wherever feasible to utilize favorable weather
conditions.
75 businesses X $40 = $3,000
5. The city is exploring means of establishing an energy conservation loan
fund. It is hoped the fund will be at least $
ABSTRACT
• The Hutchinson Community Energy Council has put together a Small Business
Energy Management Program that promises in its first year to provide up to 130
businesses with energy conservation workshops and flexible consultation/energy
audit services to help each business develop an energy economizing strategy
and investment installation.
The program, if funded, will begin with demonstration audits on up to six
medium sized businesses. These will be selected primarily for the visibility
and impact they can give to the CEC program to demonstrate energy conservation
potential to community businesses. The audits will be assisted by one -day on-
site visits by engineers from the Department of Energy and Economic
Development.
The CEC will hire an energy coordinator, probably on an independent
contractor basis, who will staff an energy office housed in Hutchinson Utility
facilities. With assistance and advice from the Utility the coordinator will
schedule and run four workshops for businesses dealing with general energy
conservation information and strategies common to most businesses.
Participants will be given the opportunity to sign up for the individual
consultation/audit program. Businesses will also be solicited for the
individual program by person-to-person, door-to-door contact by the
coordinator. It is the goal of the Energy Council to have 130 businesses
participate in the program.
•The consultation/audit program will proceed in several phases, each being
more in depth than the previous one. The first will be visits and
consultations by the energy coordinator with individual businesses on-site.
These visits would last an average of two hours. The visits will include a
discussion of energy management needs, problems, concerns and opportunities of
the business person regarding his/her facilities. The coordinator will give
each business a copy of "How to Reduce Energy Costs in your Building"
(provided by DEED), show the business person how to use it, and leave other
appropriate literature. The coordinator will help determine what step for the
business to take next, if any. These may include an infra -red audit by
Hutchinson Utilities, individual consultation from a Utility representative on
demand and power factor charges, utility bill analysis or a referral for
specialized workshops which may be arranged and/or conducted by the
coordinator. The initial visit would conclude with a recommendation for
further CEC services or a report recommending energy conservation activities
and/or investments the business could make. Most businesses would be
encouraged to participate in the next phase of the program: the walk-through
audit.
The walk-through audit would be a medium -depth analysis of conservation
opportunities and would last an average of four hours including a writeup of
recommendations and discussion of results with the business person. It would
concentrate on the building envelope, business lighting and touch on aspects
of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems, hot water use,
refrigeration, machinery, as well as service, maintenance and energy
• management strategies. This phase would conclude with a written report with
recommendations for action and investments including cost -benefit estimates,
and discussion with the business person. The energy coordinator will in this
phase, as in the others, stress motivation and follow through and help the
business determine immediate concrete steps to follow.
• Many business energy conservation problems can get complex quickly and
can need the services of an experienced commercial auditor and/or engineer.
The walk through audit will be followed up with more in-depth analysis by such
a person for some of the businesses. Up to this point the CEC program would
be free of charge. However where a consultant commercial auditor/engineer is
called in to audit a business, the business would pay a fee of $100 to the
energy council. (This fee is a target and will be decided later by the energy
council.) The fee would cover a briefing of the consultant by the
coordinator, a review of information gathered in the first two phases, and
recommendations to the consultant to focus on specific items of concern. This
assistance should considerably reduce the expense of an in depth audit,
certainly in excess of the $100 fee. The cost of the in depth audit would be
an eligible item for the loan fund.
Finally, recommendations made at each phase of the program would be
written up so that the business person can get specific bids and apply to the
energy program or a bank for loan funds to install the improvements.
Toward the end of the program grant, the coordinator will evaluate its
effectiveness by reporting the number of participants by phases, estimating
the cost savings of recommendations made, and surveying a sampling of business
to determine the amount of installations and behavior changes made and their
resultant savings.
r1
U
41
APPENDICES
• 1 Resolution Establishing HCEC
2 List of Members and Affiliations
Resolution Authorizing Submission of Application and Execution
•
•
Appendix 1
• (RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING HCEC ATTACHED)
RESOLUTION 8249
ESTABLISHING A HUTCHINSON
COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson promotes the conservation
and efficient use of energy resources and the use of renewable
energy resources within the City; and
• WHEREAS, Energy Conservation should be viewed as an
Economic Development activity which promotes efforts to keep
energy costs down and maintains efficient use of natural
resources;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of
Hutchinson that this city shall establish a Community Energy
Council to participate in the Governor's Community Energy
Program and to plan, promote and implement energy conservation
efforts within the city.
Adopted March 25, 1986, by the Hutchinson City Council.
2aej— /ZX
Paul Ackland, Mayor
Hutchinson City Council
ATTEST:
Gary Plotz
41 City Administrator
Appendix 2
LIST OF MEMBERS AND AFFILIATIONS
Butch Wentworth, Chairman
Glenn Matejka
Jay Beytien
Kenneth Prihoda
Hugh Foster
•
•
Representing Labor
Representing Low -Moderate Income
Representing Service Organizations
Representing Senior Citizens
Representing Small Business
Appendix 3
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION AND AUTHORIZATION
TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT AND CERTIFICATIONS
Be it resolved that:
1) Hutchinson, MN, City Council act as sponsoring unit of government for the
project titled Hutchinson Community Energy Council Small Business Energy
Program to be conducted during the period Fall 1986 to Fall 1987. The
City Administrator is hereby authorized to apply to the Minnesota
Department of Energy and Economic Development for funding of this project
on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
2) The City of Hutchinson enter into a grant agreement with the State of
Minnesota for the project named above if the application is successful.
The City Administrator is hereby authorized to execute certifications as
required and execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the
project named above.
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson on
(Date)
0
SIGNED:
(Signature)
(Title)
(Date)
•
WITNESSED:
Signature
(Title)
Date
John I Bemhapn
E.ecal,ve Director
16121 58]-5252
Gary D. Pbv,
Ctty Administrator
16121581-5151
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Pres. Ronald 1. M,Gra,,
Almmit, u1 Law
Vice Prc,Arthur L Co"Wr
President
Fid National Bank
St,, To,asChad B. Pichl
Ccrdficd Publa Acc,.
Penner, DuWayne
Pmermn 5 Co
T.A. (Buzz) Burich
Ex. V . Cilium,
Bunk and rmu Co
Tom Dagpnl
V.P., f moral M...,,
Hmchnson M18. & SuluY. Ira.
Nmald A. Gas
s. Fireouc Fed
� .
Y.^ & Loan A,s n
Glenn Ma"ku
Sup, of S:hool.
DiHrict 121
Hutchinson Community Development Corp.
45 Washington Ave. East
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 ,"
August 21, 1986
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Ron McGraw, Chairman of Hutchinson Community Development Corporation
SUBJECT: Board of Directors retreat/meeting
Over the course of a year, many boards, commissions, and committees
meet to perform the many functions necessary to maintain the high
quality of life the citizens of our community come to expect. The
dedication of all the groups point to the commitment all have to the
Hutchinson area.
The non-profit Hutchinson Community Development Corporation shares
in this philosophy. The committees functioning in their various roles,
have provided quality, professional service to the Board of Directors.
In turn, the Board of Directors meet regularly to discuss, research
and take action on various proposals and recommendations.
There are times when meetings have been cancelled because Board members'
work load or responsibility at their place of business have precluded
them from attending a Board meeting. The Board members take their work
very seriously and consider their activity on HCDC as a very important
role in the economic development of the Hutchinson area.
To give proper, indepth attention, deliberation and study to the community
needs and away from the pressing demands of their gainful employment,
the format of a retreat/meeting setting removed from the City appeared
to be in proper professional order.
We, the Board of Directors of HCDC, trust you'll share our view of this
torina°:as being one way at this time in helping us carry out our role.
We, the Board of HCDC, thank you as citizens of this community for the
deducation you bring as City Council members and appreciate the position
you take in promoting Hutchinson.
(612) 587-5151
J-WH3U7CHINSON.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN. 55350
August 20, 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland
and
Members of the Hutchinson City Council
Re: Ford A. Rolfe, Sr.
Dear Mayor Ackland and Council Members:
On August 12, 1986 the Hutchinson City Council directed me to
contact Ford Rolfe, Sr. concerning clean-up of property he
owns on Third Avenue. This item was directed to be a
continuing agenda item for the Council's consideration. On
August 13, 1986 I contacted Mr. Rolfe by letter informing him
41 of what I understand the Council's position of clean-up of his
property to be. I am enclosing a copy of that letter for your
consideration.
I would suggest that you view the property prior to the August
26, 1986 Council meeting so that you may determine for
yourselves whether you believe progress towards compliance
with municipal ordinances is being made.
Sincerely yours
I 0� -H, �<4
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:nb
Enclosure
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
August 13, 1986
Mr. Ford A. Rolfe, Sr.
844 2nd Avenue SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Clean-up of Third Avenue Property
Dear Mr. Rolfe:
On August 12, 1986 the Hutchinson City Council considered the
status of your property located on Third Avenue in the City of
Hutchinson. They were particularly concerned that the condition
of the property may violate several Municipal Ordinances,
specifically:
1 The accumulation of bushes, branches, lumber, wood •
and other materials may constitute a violation of
Hutchinson City Ordinance 1040:00 which prohibits
the accumulation of 'fill, rubbish, refuse, and
waster materials or other materials and substances
which are or are likely to constitute a fire hazard
or a place,in which rats or other vermin may be
harbored."
2 That the accumulation and storage of barrels,
washing machines, storage tanks and other material
may constitute a violation of Hutchinson City Ordinance
1025:10 Subdivision 4, which prohibits " the un -
housed storage of pipe, lumber, forms, machinery,
old unlicensed wrecked or junked cars or car bodies
other than occupational materials."
Prior to the August 12th Council Meeting, City Police Chief
Dean O'Borsky discussed this matter with you and you indicated
that you would begin clean-up work on this property. I am
enclosing Xeroxed copies of photographs taken of the area
on the day of August 12, 1986. The Council does not believe
that the current condition of the property constitutes compliance
with the terms of the ordinance not does it feel that the
current condition of the property exhibits satisfactory progress
Mr. Ford A. Rolfe, Sr.
Page 2
•
August 13, 1986
towards the alleviation of the condition under discussion.
This may be because you have not had an opportunity to complete
your clean-up work. If this is the case please contact me
when clean-up work is complete so that we may have the property
view and report back to the Council on its condition.
You will note that the photographs enclosed show storage of
numerous automobile bodies. You indicated that you are in
the business of restoring antique or classic automobiles and
that such a land use is permitted by the Hutchinson Zoning
Regulations. This property is located in an I -C-1 District.
Such a district requires all uses to be done by Conditional
Use Permit. To the best of my knowledge no Conditional Use
Permit has been issued to you, authorizing an automobile repair
or service establishment. i would suggest that application
for a Conditional Use Permit be made if you continue to desire
to utilize the property for the stated purpose of repair and
reconditioning of automobiles.
I would refer you to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
• Section 168.10, Subdivision 1E. This section deals in general
with antique automobiles and the particular subdivisions states
that "pioneer, classic, collector vehicles, or street rods,
licensed or unlicensed, operable or inoperable, may be stored
in compliance with the local government zoning and ordinances
on owners property, provided that the vehicles and any outdoor
storage areas they may require are maintained in such a manner
that they do not constitute a health or environmental hazard
and are screened from ordinary public view by means of a fence,*
shrubbery, rapidly growing trees or other appropriate means.
The appropriate local agency or authority may inform an owner
of his failure to comply with these requirements, and may
order the vehicles removed from the outdoor storage area if
the owner fails to comply with these requirements within 20
days after the warning." Even if the repair and restoration
of classic automobiles is an authorized conditional use for
your zoning area it is the cities position that Minnesota
Statutes 168.10, Subdivision lE requires that the storage
of the automobiles which you possess be screened from ordinary
public view through the use of fence, shrubbery, rapidly growing
trees or other appropriate means.
This is to inform you that you have apparently failed to comply
with these requirements and that the city may order the vehicles
• removed from the outdoor storage area if compliance is not
made within 20 days after the date of receipt of this document.
Mr. Ford A. Rolfe, Sr. •
Page 3
August 13, 1986
I would suggest that you discuss this matter with the Hutchinson
City Council at the next Council Meeting in order to inform
them of any steps which you plan to take in order to bring
your property into compliance with MSA 168.10, Subd.lE.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to contact me directly.
Sincerely yours,
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:nb
Enclosure
0
C7
• CITY OF SNINSON OBJECTIVES •
FIRST AND SECOND QUARTER STATUS REPORT - 1986
PRIORITY/ITEM
1. Police Station
2. Hold or Reduce
Spending
3. Select Engineer -
Phase III for
Treatment Plant
4. Adopt Policy
Handbook
SCOPE OF OBJECTIVE
Purchase site, hire architect,
design, bid, project construc-
tion through footing stage
This objective has to do with
the formulation of the 1987 bud-
get
Identify the scope of services
needed for proposed work, se-
lect engineering firm
Hold another workshop and sub-
sequently adopt proposed poli-
cies
TARGET DATE S
STATUS _ AS OF:
12/31/86 50 7/15 - The site has been purchased; project manager and
architect under contract; new committee appointed; con-
ceptual design and layout evaluated by committee; bid
specification to sell/remove house(s) have been drawn up
by project manager, bid opening for sale or demolition
Aug. 1; referendum on fund transfer from fire construction
account approved; target date to have 'footings' in ground
before freeze looks attainable.
25 7/15 - Budget worksheets have been distributed; work-
sheets are to be returned to the Finance Director by July
29. The Council discussed establishing a dollar limit on
respective department(s), prior to submittal - no action
was taken; the budget process is proceeding according to
the process/procedure of prior years.
In regards to holding down spending in the current calen-
dar year, one of the largest savings appears to be in the
area of insurance. Specifically, the recommendation to
bid employee health, and to bid employee dental, instead
of renewing, has created a substantial savings.
11/1/86 20 7/15 - Two meetings have been held to identify the scope
of services. These meetings have involved Marlow, Ralph,
Randy, Ken, myself; the last meeting we had Mayor Ackland
attend. The scope of services and selection of an archi-
tect is scheduled for consideration at the August 12
Council meeting. Mr. Michael Hoff and Mr. James Miller
of Donohue 6 Associates will be making the presentation.
1/1/86 95 7/15 - The policy handbook has been reviewed at two
special Council meetings this year, and adopted in May.
The continuing objective is to further improve or add
policies.
S. Calendar/Community
Design and produce a calendar, 12/31/86
7/15 - No action has been taken to date. It is noted this
Survey
approximately one-half high-
is an unbudgeted item; expenditure will be proposed in 1987
lighting recreation and one-
budget. More discussion by the City Council/staff on the
half other City services; dates
importance of this item/survey would be helpful.
of registration, tournaments, and
meetings would be included; also
there would be post-paid return
survey card to get community in-
put of issues of special interest
to the City Council
6. Self -Insurance
Encourage self-insurance bids 8/1/86
100 7/15 - The specifications of employee health insurance were
within employee health and dental
drawn to allow for a self-insurance proposal. Although no
specification/bids, compare with
'pure* self-insurance bids were made, retro-spective proposals
other alternatives
were made by both Blue Cross/Blue Shield and PHP.
7. Recycle Garbage/ Establish a Recycle Committee and 12/31/86
Amend Contract amend contract to encourage recycl-
ing glass, aluminum, steel cans,
cardboard, etc.
Retro-spective proposals mean that if claims are below a speci-
fied percentage of premium percent, the City saves money and
receives a refund.
In regards to employee dental insurance, the City received two
"Pure* self-insurance bids. The anticipated premiums were more
than the "guaranteed" premium of the low bid (SunLife); there-
fore, self-insurance was not recommended at this time.
10 7/15 - The City Council has established a local Solid Waste
Management Committee. Mark Schnobrich, City forester, is a
member and was selected by the group to be the chairman. They
have mainly foscued on "composing., Amending the garbage con-
tract is something perhaps the City Attorney would be in the
best position to negotiate after the local Solid Waste Man-
agement Committee has a specific proposal to evaluate
(aluminum, steel, glass, cardboard, etc.).
0 0 0
8. Implement To establish program/guide-
Revolving lines to assist in sprinkling
Loan Program required in buildings downtown
and make other improvements
9. Cash Management
Program d Policy
10. Establish Guide-
lines for Merit
Increase
11. Future Pending
And Deferred
Special Assess-
ments
12/31/86 7/15 - John Bernhagen, George Field, and I have met on this
topic. Renovation of the water lines in the downtown may
be one of the conclusions in the RCM report. If this is
so, new water lines could possibly go through the basement(s)
of the buildings, replacing our existing lines. Such an im-
provement would need to be coordinated with this particular
objective, as not to duplicate the expense of getting water
inside buildings. This objective may or may not meet its tar-
get, based on information we are waiting for.
12/31/86
7/15 - Although this project has not been started, it was orig-
inally projected to be done in late fall, after the City budget
adoption.
Establish a maximum per- 6/1/86 100 7/15 - The City Council has established a guideline/policy.
cent increase in merit
pay
Place on the computer future 12/31/86 7/15 - The City Engineer has advised me that it will not be
and deferred special assess- possible for him to work on this project until after the an-
ments nual improvement construction season is over.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 13, 1986
• (h) CONSIDERATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF ASSISTANT TO ENGINEER
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to defer action to the
next Council meeting for additional information. Motion seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF OBTAINING APPRAISAL FOR SERVICE ROAD ON T.H. 7 WEST IN
CONJUNCTION WITH HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
The City Engineer recommended the City obtain a land cost appraisal
from the State for the service road on T.H. 7 West.
Mr. Jim Thiesfeld, manager of Big Bear, stated that traffic from his
business location would have to go west to go into town. He suggested
the service road start at California Street, eliminating this problem.
Engineer Priebe commented it was not feasible to have a road on Cali-
fornia. Also, this is a proposed State Highway Department project, and
the City did not prepare the plans.
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to authorize the City Administrator to obtain an
appraisal from the State.
(j) DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE LIGHTING IN CITY PARKING LOTS
• Following discussion of lighting in the city parking lots, the motion
was made by Alderman Torgerson to refer to the Utilities a recommenda-
tion for lighting in the Wigen parking lot. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Carls and unanimously carried.
(k) DISCUSSION OF ENFORCEMENT OF SIGN ORDINANCE
City Administrator Plotz stated the sign ordinance is a part of the
City's zoning ordinance. However, the Building Official encounters op-
position to his authority to enforce it. Following discussion, it was
the consensus of the Council for the staff to be consistent in enforc-
ing the sign ordinance.
00)
CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATION OF HANDICAP RAMP NEAR ENTRANCE OF PUBLIC
LIBRARY (REQUESTED BY ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS)
Engineer Priebe reported there was no requirement in the building code
to have a handicap ramp in front of the library door. The architect
was contacted, and he was not willing to pay for any changes in the -
plans. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to refer the matter
to the City Engineer to obtain a price estimate on the cost of putting
in a handicap ramp. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously
carried.
• (m) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF IBM COMPUTER FOR BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 27, 1986
Coordinator, Building Official, and any others pending. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(c) NSTALLATION OF HANDICAP RAMP NEAR ENTRANCE OF PUBLIC LIBRARY
(REQUESTED BY ALDERMAN MIKE CARLS) (DEFERRED MAY 13, 1986)
The City Engineer presented four options and cost estimates from Han-
son Construction Company to install a handicap ramp near the entrance
of the public library. It was his recommendation to locate it in the
middle of the median, which was the City's original choice. The cost
for the work could be taken out of the library construction fund.
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to accept option No. 1,
using a concrete surface, at a cost of $566.50. Motion seconded by
Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
Alderman Carls moved to direct the City Administrator and City Attor-
ney to pursue the City Engineer's recommendation to contact the archi-
tect regarding the additional cost of changing the ramp. The motion
was seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar •
and unanimously carried, to authorize discontinuation of service as
recommended unless other arrangements have been made.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF JOINT HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CITY OF
HUTCHINSON POLICY FOR USE OF FACILITIES
City Administrator Plotz reported a joint school/city committee had
established a policy and fees for the use of facilities.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the policy.
Alderman Carls seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF LEASE FOR CIVIC ARENA BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 423
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by
Alderman Mlinar, to approve the lease agreement. Motion carried unan-
imously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR LIBRARY
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve the elevator
maintenance contract for the public library at a rate of $53 per month,
effective July 1, 1986. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unani-
mously carried.
4
P- e ,
WILY PLUS, ING.
6121 EXCELSIOR BLVD.
ST. LOUIS PARK. MN 55416
. 1612) 9200708
G 1985
m o„
LVED
August 18, 1986
Kenneth B. Merrill
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Dear Mr. Merrill;
Enclosed please find the packets of information on Family Plus, Inc. that
I promised you in our telephone conversation on the above date. The rest
of the information that you asked for will be forthcoming at the meeting.
• If you need further information, please feel free to contact me, at the a-
bove phone number M -F from 1 50p.m. - 5:30p.m.
•
Sincerely yours,
Joy Harris,
Gaming Manager
encl.
A PRIVATE, NON-PROFIT, COMMUNITY ORIENTED RESOURCE FOR FAMILIES.-' ��
(612) 587-5151
FC/TY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 26, 1986
T0: — Mayor and—City Council
----------------------------
FROM: Marilyn — Swanson, Administrative Secretary
-----------------------------
SUBJECT: Gambling License for Family Plus Inc.
------------------------------
Mr. James Harris of the Charitable Gambling Control Board in St. Paul
called on lvbnday regarding Ken Merrill's recent inquiry concerning
• Family Plus Inc. Under separate cover he sent the City a copy of the
Adopted Rules, which arrived in today's mail and are attached.
Mr. Harris mentioned that the City has 30 days from the date of applica-
tion in which to accept or reject an application and notify the Gambling
Control Board. It was pointed out that Family Plus's application was dated
August 1, 1986. Therefore, if no objection has been submitted to the Board
by September 1, it will automatically be approved.
Attachment
0
•
•
(612) 587-5151
r CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: August 25, 1986
TO: Marlow V. Priebe, Director of Engineering
FROM; Orlin Henke, Fire Chief
George F. Field, Fire Marshal
Homer Pittman, Building official
RE: Greencastle Site
Freemont Avenue Cul-de-sac
We have reviewed the plans showing the offsets in the cul-de-sac.
The location of the fire hydrant is okay in the northwest portion of the
cul-de-sac; and that hydrant is to be inplace and usable, as well as
the cul-de-sac being inplace and usable before any occupancy is granted.
It is, also, our opinion, that the cul-de-sac will be more functional if it
is centered on Freemont Avenue, rather than offset as shown. There appears
to be no hardship in land use of centering on Freemont Avenue.
Orlin Henke George F. Field
Fire Chief Fire Marshal
/pv
cc: Mayor and City Council
Newell Weed
Homer Pittman
Bldg. Official
/ / (612) 587.5151
f1UT5!/1' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
/ � L"'?CriINSON MINN 55350�EST
M E M O
DATE: August 19, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Freemont Avenue Cul-de-sac
Greencastle Site
Enclosed are three proposals being considered by staff. I have requested
comments from the staff and a report will be available at the meeting.
•
MVP/pv
enc.
0
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
PIOPOSED CUL-DE-SAC
PIP f
\_O
I�
P.
b°
IL
V�
= 6 0
o.
Lcn� o�
E0
�^
North
line of Greenc
stle property
FREMONT AVENUE
-
-- --
a
e
gaok' ✓f t,..L
s:0
�
t
right of way line
1
i"` . .►�.-
curb'f �
V
I
i
` B ,
A le, NJ YC "e/A/ ak,/
GREENCASTLE BUILDING
86123 s
POPOSED CUL-DE-SAC S
RIw
-60
IQ P
x
N
dnhole
FREMONT
16A, f,
c
AVENUE
E1
O /
o M
North line of Gr encostle property
C
a'.o
r Proposed right of way line
1 h\'y curb'f
V
I
I
1
I 30' I
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
A„
hlte.ro a.�e R/�✓ end
Gc.rb Pla s� by Mau. Pr[iP
B -14-8L
GREENCASTLE
BUILDING
66123 0
PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC
ems' o s c�.t
' O
3. •
R= 60
nholeA
E stsrit• ec ; C•wrb �
E
e M
North line of Greencastle property
FREMONT AVENUE - - --
C
•,O
curb -- -�
proposed right of way line
1
curb
I ,
1
1
, 1
,
I o ,
� 1 �y b,w•if'�ai ii j' �r�e.aCA ifIC
by N•v•Pr.eb�
1
I " 30'
I GREENCASTLE BUILDSG
esiza s
F
(612) 587-5151
/TY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 26, 1986
T0• Mayor $ City Council
FROM. Water Billing Department
SUBJECT: — Delinquent Water Accounts for the month of August— — — —
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water accounts for
the month of August. Recommend water service be discontinued
. on Tuesday, September 2, 1986 at Noon.
Ya a Haugen Miles Mi llhi to Calvin Lee
250 tfth g NN 136 11 Av HE 416 Adams St S
Hutch ns MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
250 Fi >h Av NW 136 11 Av HE 416 Adams St S
3-080 25Q 041 3-130-0136-041 3-210-0416-081
80.f \ 175.87 90.78
James Reilein ary Aanderude Randy Cassens
481 Clark St 4 Conne �ticut St 498 Connecticut St
Hutchinson Mn 55350 Hu tci0.s n MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
481 Clark St 420 Co ne,tic,t 498 Connecticut St
3-320-0481-052 3-34 0420-051 3-340-0498-021
95.78 11 48 63.86
Promises 9/5/86 ,
Linda Squier James Lanie Tim Koster
483 James St N 485 Kouwe St 441 Main St N
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
483 James St N 485 Kouwe St 441 Main St N
3-560-0483-021 - 3-600-0485-021' 3-680-0441-082
98.85 113.07 14,25
Jim Lindmeyer Leo Hammer Dale Schlueter
705 Main St N 99 McLeod Av 336 Monroe St S
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
705 Main St N 99 McLeod Av 336 Monroe St S
3-6BO-0105-111 3-105-0099-042 3-735-0336-011
101.56 76.94 89.25
Promises 9/5/86
James Deragon
Gerald Elliott
Ray Haxson
540 Monroe St S
590 Monroe St S
1262 Rolling Oaks Ln
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Monroe St S
590 Monroe St S
1262 Rolling Oaks Ln
3-735-0540-031
3-735-0590-021
3-845-1262-044
131.16
127.69
48.56
cc: Don Oobratz
200 Lake St
'
Hutchinson MN 55350
Midwest Trailer Ct
Jerome Rauch
Darla Smith
Box 157
Box 2031
Buffalo Lake MN 55314
Winsted MN 55395
Hutchinson MN 55350
450 Water St
587 Franklin St S
745 Franklin St S
3-970-0450-051
1-395-0587-024
1-395-0745-011
2073.39
95.40
141.21
cc: Mary Barrick
cc: John Wagner
1000 E 14th St
825 Grove St S
Minneapolis MN 55401
Hutchinson MN 55350
Scot Shoen
Paul Schmidt
Doug Lee
Box 431
987 Echo Or X306
326 Franklin St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
563 Juul Rd
439 Third Av SE
173 Fifth Av HE
2-585-0563-084
3-045-0439-026
3-075-0173-052
61.56
118.58
91.72
cc: Bob Rasmussen
cc: Lloyd Allen
cc: Robert McGee
321 Erie St
235 Hassan St S
173 Fifth Av HE
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 9/24/86
Karen Curtis
Midwest Trailer Ct
Hutchinson MN 55350
486 California St
3-275-0485-052
217.19
cc: Vance Holler
486 California St
Hutchinson MN 55350
,(612) 587-5151
ivarcH` CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 22, 1986
T0: Mayor & City Council— -------------
FROM: Marilyn Swanson, Administrative— Secretary — — — — — — — —
--------------------
SUBJECT: Transient —Merchants—License
----------------------------
Again this year we have received a request from Dwayne Knigge, owner of
• Village Home Entertainment Center in Hopkins, to conduct a sale of used
TV sets on September 6-7, 1986 at the AmericInn in Hutchinson.
Mr. Knigge initially submitted an application in 1984, which was checked
by the Police Department. He has subsequently conducted a sale every
year. To date the City has had no problem with his firm.
•
M,ONokVOK (:A/ C l l!/ ye
Home Entertainment Center
COUNTRY VILLAGE AT] O CENTER
IV7&
HOPKINS. MIN" 553A3 U
/ 1
✓I i
ZENITH
612-935-77640
y
,Vv0
M
AUG 1986co
N RME
0
11I
(612) 587-5151
;vvrcH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
__- HU7CHINSON', MINN 55350
AUGUST 22, 1986
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
--------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: 1987 BUDGET REVIEW
--------------------------------------------------------------
First review of the budget is ready to begin. In the past
the city council has reviewed each department's budget with the
appropriate department head or director.
Last year the process began by holding a review session
beginning at 5:30 pm and lasting until 9 or 10 pm.
• I would ask the council to set a review date for the 1987
budget at this meeting. We must have the general fund budget
set which would allow the tax levy to be set by the 10th of
October.
11
r
(612) 587-5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O
DATE: August 22, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Assessment Roll No. 222
Shady Haven Subdivision
Attached is the above -referenced assessment roll for service leads to the lots
in Shady Haven Subdivision, as per the Subdivision Agreement.
Agreement waived a public hearing for this work and assessment for same.
Subsequent to approval of Roll No. 222, notices will be sent to the •
property owners.
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
attachment
9 0 0
CostPiled Byf M. V. PRIEBE
NAME 8 ADDRESS ADDITION OR
UUJ7 rEN UN11 f
i1,lYb.L/
Co Puted Byf M. V. PRIEBE
SERVICE LEAD f
7,816,00
Chocked Byf C. RICE
SHADY HAVEN
N0. YRS. SPREAD t
10
BLOCK
SANITARY SEWER 6 WATER SERVICE s LIFT STATION
UNIT USED f
PER Lor
ASSP_tiS4P.NT POLI. NO_ 222
AS PER SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
1 23-263-0010
ACCT. PARCEL
NAME 8 ADDRESS ADDITION OR
SERVICE
LIFT
TOTAL
NO. NO.
OF OWNER SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
STATION
ASSESSMENT
1 23-263-0010
Richard H. 6 Linda J. Martin
1235 McDonald Drive
5-117-30-08-0241
Hutchinson, MN 55350 Shady Haven
1
$1,196.27
250.00
$ 1 446.27
2 23-263-0020
Ronald 6 Dianne M. Pribyl
630 Shady Ridge Road
35-117-30-08-0242
Hutchinson, MN 55350 Shad,, Haven
2
1
$1,196-27
$ 1,816.00$
250.00
$ 3,262.27
3 23-263-0030
Norman 6 Kathryn Sharstrom
600 Shady Ridge Road
35-117-30-08-0243
Hutchinson, Mi 55350 Shad Haven
3
1
196.27
250.00
S 1.446.27
Total Interest..
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 222
• Resolution No. 8366
WHEREAS, the Council has met and activated the proposed assessment for
the improvement of Shady Haven by the construction of Sanitary Sewer and Water
Service and Lift Station, as per Shady Haven Subdivision Agreement,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the 1st day of January, 1987, and shall bear interest at
the rate of 7.6 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this
assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on
the entire assessment from October 1, 1986, until the 31st day of December,
1987. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for
• one year on all unpaid installments.
•
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, wih interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1986; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October
10, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding
year.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the
County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
City Cl
Mayor
1—
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
�SHINGTONA✓tNUE
.4"SON. MkNN 553.50
August 20, 1986
MEMORANDUM
T*: MAYOR • yf CITY
FROM: HAZEL SITZ, PERSONNEL COORDDIATOR Ar --
The Council requested research to update the City's i:ncare guidelines
for senior citizen deferred special assessments. The guideline
adopted in Septetber, 1984, was as follows:
One Person Two Persons Assets, Excluding Hanestead
$7,000 $8,500 $25,000
Several agencies were contacted concerning both Federal and State guidelines
• for low inane. Each uses different figures, depending on the particular
program. Most agencies were able to supply only 1986 data, and did not
have readily available the information showing change since 1984.
Sane examples:
Region 6E Commmity Action Agency Fuel Assistance for 1966
One Person Two Persons
$7,620
$9,964
RPVS (e[rployment) Federal Guidelines for 1984 and 1986 Poverty Levels
$4,980 (1984)
$5,360 (1986)
$6,720 (1984) (Approximately 8% change
$7,240 (1986) in two years.)
Region 6E RDC -U.S. Administration on Aging Poverty Guidelines for 1985 and 1986
One Person Two Persons
$4,775 (1985) $6,023 (1985) (Approximately 4% change in
$4,979 (1986) $6,282 (1986) one year.)
. $5,969 (1985) $7,529 (1985) near poverty, or 125% of poverty"
$6,224 (1986) $7,853 (1986)
Based on a sunmo y of the above, it would seen that an increase of around 8%
in Hutchinson's senior citizen deferred assessment guideline after two years
would be a reasonable amount.
9- 14:7,
RESOLUTION NO. 7854
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING INCOME GUIDELINES AND ASSET LIMITATIONS
FOR SENIOR CITIZENS DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS .
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Statutes provide tax deferral for senior citizens,
65 years of age and older, for whom it would be a hardship to make payments,
and
WHEREAS, the home owner can make application for deferred payment of special
assessments on forms which can be obtained from the City Clerk's office.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council has established the following income guide-
lines and asset limitations for applications of deferred assessments:
1. Deferred assessments be granted to person(s) with a low income of
$7,000.00 per year for one person and $8,500.00 per year for a
married couple; and
2. Deferred assessments be granted to person(s) with an asset limita-
tion of not to exceed $25,000.00, excluding the homestead.
• Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of September, 1984.
ATTEST:
.� '
Gary D.%Plotz
City Administrator
•
Robert H. Stearns
Mayor
The attached are guidelines only. If your income and assets exceed the
guidelines, but you feel that you have a special situation, you may
appeal directly to the City Council for their consideration.
0
•
.�L 7 •,2/3
APPLICATION FOR DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY PERSONS 65 YEARS
OF ACE OR OLDER FOR UtHOH IT WOULD BE A HARDSHIP TO BARE PATHENTS
To th/el Mayor and Council, City of Hutchinson, State of Hionesota.
¢AfS am oumer-oceupsot of the.
following de''bbcriDed real estate situated in the City of Hutchinson.
LEGAL OR TAXABLE DESCRIPTION! +��7i— f"'? B L k e 2(c
'�'('�[1t AYTI ro cn /�i�Tc'171i, cn,iA �CY17-�i it ate_
I am 65 years or older and do ow and occupy above described real estate as
my homestead. .
A special assesament in the amount of $ has. been atade
co®encing in the year with interest at the rate of L for
(Kind of Special Assessment)
Such specialassessment amount causes ■ hardship for me to make payment
thereof.
The following infornition will help substantiate my.claim for deferral of
special assesamentst
• Annual income from all sources
Ash assets $ %�QO •- 00
Other assets $jjr, I '$
Estimate Value of Residence $
Other Real or Personal Property $
I hereby request that above assessment of $ 7 9/-d I - _ be
deferred as provided in Chapter 206, Lava 1974, 68th Legislature, Second
Regular -Session, H.S. 444.22 Through 444.24. -
I hereby declare that the foregoing statements are true and I/vt make app--
licatlou for deferral of special sisessments as outlined beiein.
Y
APPIIcan't
Date -
0
APPLICATIO'I AND AUTN,ORI7.ATION FOR DELAYED PAY;E-IT OF TAX
ON SPECIAL ASSESS'iEUS FOR SP1I0:R CITIZENS' H0AFSTU%0
LAMS 1974, CHAPTER 205
STATE OF i1I,NNESOTA )
Oty of r, 1 &0 A )
To:
Assessor of
Da to rJ— -a 9 19j
i, the undersigned, declare under penalties of perjury:
That I reside at
County, Minnesota
That I am not less than 65 years of
ac= and
t`:at the date of
my birth isThat
I am the owner of the property
legally
described as:
167`00,?
That my interest in the ownership of the above property rias acquired on �.,p= 19S
and is as follows:
1. Sole ownership (Enter yes, if appliczbl
2. Joint tenancy, held with
3. Other undivided interestpeciry )-
That on January 2,
1? or
June
1, 19
Iiestead and such
occupancy
began
on _
I owned and occupied the above property as my
_19
That the taxes for improve—ents on the special assessments duly adopted in ordinance by the
or' as of 19
a:hich ave been allocated against the subject property taould create undue personal hardship
on my behalf and I_respectfully request that payment be delayed and that such taxes be so
deferred for -the years 19 to 19
Signed
r,ner
it Clerk of the of
inounty, StatL, of Minnesota, do hereby cert y that the applicat�
of above nzed, has been duly revieti:ed and that in actor
ante with the isinutes of officia record in said chambers was duly Q APPROVED or O-DUIED
as of 19
That in accordance with approval granted, that the tzxes on the affiants subject property
levied for annual collection in the ar„ount of S for the year(s)
should be so deferred with interest at the annus rate of A, until such tir.,� as it is
d1Wd the applicant no longer qualifies or the property loses its eligibility.
Dated 19
C erk or Authorized Deputy)C
1 ,
WFICE OF REGISTER OF DEEDS )
zPTATE OF j"IM lESOT1 )
County of )
I hereby certify that the t•:ithin Authorization was filed in this office for rem
on the day of A.D. 19 at o'clock N., and that
delayed payrients in tl e amount of $ for each of the fears 19 to 19 ,
subject to annual rates of interesttx de at _ _0 was duly recordadin Cook ,
on page
W.
register of Deeds
By
Ceput,
ASSESSORS' ORDER Ai;D%0? NOTICE OF TERMINATION •
ON DEFERRED TAX FOR SENIOR CITIZENS _
I certify that I have reviewed th-- application of
herein naiad, that it has been duly approved and that taxes levied for special assessor=-nts
under the subject ordinance have been officially deferred in the amount of $ for
each of the following year(s) , subject to annual intErest fixed
at % as recorded in Cook Page of the records in the Register of
Dee•is office in this county,.and it is so ordere
Date of Approval
The above order ter.iindted this
Reason (s
19
County Assessor
OR
day of
19
•
;nty Assessor
August 18th, 1986 6v„0,* 2%
OCti
City of Hutchinson ey
CITY COUNCIL
City Hall
In regard to your letter I received August 16th, 1986 for
weed cutting in the amount of $125.00.
On June5th I received a letter about weed cutting. I tried
to get inspector on the phone; also left messages for him to
call me back; which he did not do.
Lot #6 Block 1, Swanson's subdivision is all in alfalfa.
The third crop was cut late fall, 1985, by Jerry Koelln.
This spring Merlyn Monson was to get the hay. He went up
there to cut it and it was already cut 6/7/86. This field
produced 100 bales or more and the market price was about
$2.50 to $3.00 per bale, at the sale barn. We lost the 1st
crop as they did not pick up windrows and that was a mess to
out.
Instead of me paying $125. I am sending you a bill for $550.
• for the damage. I talked to my attorney, Ran McGraw on
August 18th,.1986.
Yours truly,
Victor L. Swanson
P.O. Box 213
Hutchinson, MN 55350
STATFENT
City of Hutchinson
City Council
City Hall
Approximately 200 bales of Hay . $550.00
• ,
q- G-,
August 18th, 1986
(612) 587-5151
f/UTCH'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Mark Schnobrich, Weed Inspector
DATE: August 21, 1986
RE: Victor Swanson Correspondence
Victor Swanson has raised a question to a weed notice he
received in regard to property along Arch Street in Hutchinson. In
reviewing his letter mailed August 18, 1986, I have a few questions
pertaining to his claim of $3.00 per bale, his time frame in contacting
us, and whether or not he can cut 100 bales an acre in one cutting.
I have been in contact with Jim Schaefer, the McLeod County
Agent, and the alleged cutter of this property in regard to the Victor
Swanson lot.
Jim Schaefer and myself are putting together a response •
for Mr. Swanson and will be able to report to the Council at their next
meeting.
•
q- G,
V,Y Parks • Recreation • Forestry • Civic Arena
900 Harrington Street • Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 (612) 587.2975
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee
Mark Schnobrich, Chairman
DATE: August 21, 1986
RE: Fall Leaf Composting Project
The Solid Waste Management Committee, comprised of twelve
volunteer members, requests the Council's cooperation in administering
a 1986 fall leaf drive.
In response to the county's sanitary landfill capacity problem,
the city waste management committee proposes to start a leaf disposal
area out at its present tree dump area. Ralph Neumann and other city
employees responsible for that area are in cooperation with such a
program.
Fall leaves collected by citizens would be deposited at the
tree dump area, and a composting process would be started.
At this time I have no response from Junker Sanitation as
to whether they will assist us or not. If by chance Junker Sanitation
would not be willing to assist us on this matter, would the City of
Hutchinson be willing to donate a truck or two (2) [volunteer drivers
would be provided by the Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee],
to provide a curb side pick up of leaves during the designated pick up
days?
The Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee feels such a
project is just one step in helping to reduce our dependency on our
county landfill.
TRAIL LICENSE AGREEMENT
• This License Agreement dated this _ day of 19_
made by and between the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereinafter called the
"City," and the State of Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of
Natural Resources, hereinafter called the "State,"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the State is authorized under Minnesota Statutes § 85.015 to
acquire and develop the multi-purpose, all season Luce Line State Trail,
hereinafter called the "Trail;" and
WHEREAS, the State has acquired an abandoned railroad right-of-way running
from Plymouth, Minnesota to Clara City, Minnesota for purposes of developing
the Trail, and the railroad grade passes through the City of Hutchinson; and
WHEREAS, said railroad grade had an interruption in the City of Hutchinson
at the time the State acquired the railroad grade; and
WHEREAS, the City owns property that could be used to partially close said
interruption; and
WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant a license to the State for purposes
of allowing public recreational use as a connection to close said interruption
of the Trail,
NOW, THEREFORE, the city for and in consideration of the covenants and
promises made herein, hereby grants to the State the right to use the
hereinafter described lands, hereinafter called the "Premises," for purposes of
maintaining a trail over and across the following described property, to wit:
A 25 foot by 950 foot right-of-way along Third Avenue Northwest;
bordered by Main Street on the east, and Glen Street on the west,
as shown in red on "Exhibit A" attached and made a part hereof.
This License Agreement is made subject to the following terms and
conditions:
1. The State shall have the right to construct, maintain, operate,
repair and use a trail over the subject property. The State shall have the
riaht to make such improvements and installations as are necessary, convenient
and incidental to the full enjoyment and use of the above premises.
•
2. This Agreement shall have a ten (10) year term, ending ten (10) years
from the initial date noted.
3. Both parties to this agreement agree that they will be responsible •
for their own acts and the results thereof, and shall not be responsible for
the acts of the other party and the results thereof.
4. The State shall have the right to post signs and markers to the
extent necessary to control snowmobile traffic.
S. Both parties agree to take no action which will interfere with the
respective authorized uses of the premises. For the City, this shall be a
roadway, for the State this shall be a multi -use, year round recreational
trail.
6. Both parties agree that this license may be terminated upon one (1)
years written notice.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands on the dates
indicated.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By By
Joseph Alexander, Commissioner
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION:
Hubert H. Humphrey, III
Attorney General
By
SpecialAssistant Attorney enera
Title
Date
E 2
Is
•
Ell Is
�I y
I� - -- a a
-- e
so
a
❑ -----------
OWNERSHIP
I State
Dakota Rail
.. _ `! .+• . ... ! Hutchinson Parks
;�. .I „�„<„ / Hutchinson Utilities
a _ Hutchinson Streets
• -------------- ..� S •. .. --�. - \ HUTCHINSON
' MINNESOT&
TRAIL LICENSE AGREEMENT
• This License Agreement dated this day of 19_
made by and between the Parks and Recreation Department of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, hereinafter called "Parks and Recreation," and the State of
Minnesota, acting by and through the Commissioner of Natural Resources,
hereinafter called the "State,"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the State is authorized under Minnesota Statutes 4 85.015 to
acquire and develop the multi-purpose, all season Luce Line State Trail,
hereinafter called the "Trail;" and
WHEREAS, the State has acquired an abandoned railroad right-of-way running
from Plymouth, Minnesota to Clara City, Minnesota for purposes of developing
the Trail, and the railroad grade passes through the City of Hutchinson; and
WHEREAS, said railroad grade had an interruption in the City of Hutchinson
at the time the State acquired the railroad grade; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation owns property that could be used to
partially close said interruption; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is willing to grant a license to the State
• for purposes of allowing public recreational use as a connection to close said
interruption of the Trail,
NOW, THEREFORE, Parks and Recreation for and in consideration of the
covenants and promises made herein, hereby grants to the State the right to use
the hereinafter described lands, hereinafter called the "Premises," for
purposes of maintaining a trail over and across the following described
property, to wit:
A 25 foot by 2,220 foot long right-of-way on dike of "Bass Pond"
area located within Section 31, Township 117 north, Range 29 west and
Section 6, Township 116 north, Range 29 west,
as shown in red on "Exhibit A" attached and made a part hereof.
This License Agreement is made subject to the following terms and
conditions:
1. The State shall have the right to construct, maintain, operate,
repair and use a trail over the subject property. The State shall have the
right to make such improvements and installations as are necessary, convenient
• and incidental to the full enjoyment and use of the above premises.
q-�
p, This Agreement shall have a ten (10) year term, ending ten (10) years
from the initial date noted.
a reement agree that they will be responsible
Both parties to this g be responsible for
3' thereof, and shall not
for their own acts and the results
other party and the results thereof.
have the right to Post si
the acts of the gns and markers to the
q, The State shall
extent necessary to control snowmobile traffic- interfere with the
5• Both parties agree to take no action which will
Of the premises. or. one (1)
be terminated up
or,
authorized. uses
6.
Both parties agree that this license may
years written notice• artier
hereto have set their hands on the dates
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the D
indicated.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
by exan er, om Iss oner
osep
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORN AND EXECUTION:
u erlump rey,
Attorney t General
By ssistant ttorney enera
pecla
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
By
Title
Date
[2]
1
U
•
low
P41k, )* &
_ e
1 f
f �
.'j�.I . •»"=°- - ® ~mac• _
r k
B
me
.1•q _ ' v B
i � .M.• • r•.,r 1 � .M1•
en
` V '
E a i- ••
G • C r•�• I
um
--• --- -------- � I•..„ ... ' OWNERSHIP
i f I
State
!�. Dakota Rail
1. r• Hutchinson Parks
~ ¢ l• l,••, % Hutchinson Utilities
© 5 ` Hutchinson Streets
e S ...�
W •-------------- --- �I V® l , �• MUTCMINSON
- 111
TA
" MINNESO
(6 i2) 587-5151
JW4HU7CHINSON,
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
MINN, 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 22, 1986
TO: City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Mayor Ackland, Hazel Sitz and Gary D. Plotz— — — — — — — —
-----------------
SUBJECT: Grade—Classification Reviews
-----------------------------
As per Council direction, a meeting was held to discuss grade classifications.
The following individuals were reviewed:
• George Field
Homer Pittman
Randy DeVries
GEORGE FIELD AND HOMER PITTMAN
Both of these individuals are presently in Grade F. Both jobs have been rated
very close to Grade E.
After detailed review of the rating of the respective jobs in relation to
others within the City organization, it was unanimously felt that Grade E
was more appropriate. This is one grade higher and is an "empty" grade at
this time. Both individuals have jobs that require supervision of numerous
plumbing, heating and building contractors. The characteristics of the super-
vision require a performance review of the contractor/ or builder and correc-
tive direction. The supervision was formerly rated relatively low.
RANDY DEVRIES
History - The primary reason the Council placed the sewer plant operations
under Maintenance Operations was the reoccurring problems in supervision and
decision-making of a former employee.
What Changed - Since the appointment of Randy DeVries, he has proven his ability
. to be a self-starter and a mover and shaker in doing his job. Much trust and
confidence has been placed in Randy. He has done an outstanding job in work-
ing with MPCA and local industry, while. on the other hand keeping the existing
plant operating as technically efficient under plant constraints. Randy's
supervision and relationship with his two subordinates appears to be very good. •
In rating the job previously, the portion of the rating called "Decision Making"
was rated very low. This is nowhere near what Randy has been doing for over
18 months. Therefore, the unanimous feeling was as follows:
1. Randy has the capability to make major department level de-
cisions.
2. The nature of Randy's decision-making (financial and impact of
service to community) is of a magnitude equal or exceeds that
of others who are already directors.
3. The current job responsibility as it relates to the planning
of the new plant justifies a review and proper rating of this
job.
4. Randy appears to have the capability to manage more employees
if called upon - ability to be a director.
5. When you have a feeling an employee is performing beyond ex-
pectations, the option of a promotion should be exercised.
Therefore, regarding Randy, it is recommended he be appointed a "director"
in charge of both water and sewer, with a one grade increase at this time,
and further review and consideration in the future, probably after the plant •
is up and operating.
QTT n Anv
The effective dates that are recommended are as follows:
George Field - Grade E Eff. January 1, 1987
Homer Pittman2 - Grade E Eff. January 1, 1987
Randy DeVries3 - Grade XII Eff. September 1, 1986
Notes
1 and 2 placement in the grade will be determined in January 1987 by City
Council.
3 placement in the grade is recommended now at the corresponding level in
the range; however, one grade higher (from 11.96 to 13.15/hr.)
/ms 0
(612) 587-5151
HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning as Submitted by School District #423
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendatiun with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning.
HISTORY
On July 22, 1986, Superintendent Glen Matejka, on behalf of ISD #423,
submitted an application to rezone a portion of lots 9 and 10, Block 11,
South 112 City, from R-2 (Multiple Family Residence) to C-3 (Commercial) for
the purpose of providing a parking lot for the elementary school (located
• across the street). The City of Hutchinson then amended the request to
include Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 11, and Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 9
in the rezoning. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 19, 1986, at which time there was
no one present who stated their objection to the request. Mr. Louis
Brunner, owner of affected property stated his concern about assessments for
future street improvements necessitated by the rezoning.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and site plan were submitted and the appropriate
fee was paid. NOTE: Portion rezoned by City does not require site plan.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. There is adjoining property zoned C-3.
RECOIM4ENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request to rezone be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
(612) 587-5151
HarcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Deloris and Clarence
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
HISTORY
At their regular June meeting, it was brought to the attention of the
Planning Commission that there was a boarding and lodging home operating in
and R-2 zone without a conditional use permit. City Attorney Schaefer was
directed to proceed with necessary action to bring operation into
compliance. On July 24, 1986, Clarence and Deloris Freitag submitted an
• application for a conditional use permit to allow the operation of a
boarding and lodging home for the elderly on property located at 615 Brown
Street. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, August 19, 1986, at which time there was no one
present who objected to the request. Mr. Torgerson stated some concern had
been raised by neighborhood residents to him about the operation.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted, subject to smoke detectors
being provided in each bedroom unit, installation of an egress window in the
basement bedroom and installation of a pipe from the safety valve on the hot
water heater within 6" of floor, and also subject to a drawing being
submitted showing the minimum requirement for parking. A gravel surface
must be completed this year and by 1987 the surface must be completed as per
City Ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
l%
(612) 587.5151
f/UTIH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HU7CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE. August 19, 1986
T0: Plannin9Commission -------------------
-----------
FROM: George Field, Fire Marshal
---------------------------
SUBJECT:
_______________
SUBJECT: LICENSING OF FREITAG BOARDING AND LODGING HOME _ _ _ _ _ _
The three items required to meeting licensing requirements
are:
1. Smoke detectors in each bedroom unit.
2. Egress window for basement bedroom.
3. Pipe from safety relief valve on the hot water heater
within 6" of floor.
These items should be accomplished within 30 days.
If you grant a conditional use permit, it should be contingent
upon the applicant meeting the above items.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8356
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW OPERATION OF BOARDING AND LODGING HOME FOR THE ELDERLY
• IN R-2 ZONE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Clarence and Deloris Freitag of Hutchinson have made application to
the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.03 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to allow the operation of a boarding and lodging home for
the elderly on property located at 615 Brown Street, with the following
legal description:
The South 1/2 of Lot 2, the North 1/2 of Lot 3, and Lot 9, B1 ock 8,
Bonniwell's 2nd Addition to the City of Hutchinson.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and
the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
• surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is
granted, based upon the findings set forth above, with the following
conditions: 1. That smoke detectors are installed in each bedroom unit.
2. An egress window is installed in the basement bedroom. 3. A pipe from
the safety relief valve on the hot water heater is installed within 6" of
the floor. 4. That a drawing showing the minimum parking requirements be
submitted. S. That the parking surface be gravel this year. 6. The the
parking surface meet City Ordinance requirements in 1987.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
• Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
J "4 ?
(612) 587.5151
H��cy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Pure Culture Products
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permi t.
HISTORY
On July 25, 1986, Pure Culture Products submitted an application for a
conditional use permit to allow the construction of a 18' by 40' concrete
block loading dock addition on the southside of the present warehouse on
property located at 35 Adams St. N and Washington Ave. E. A public hearing
• was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday,
August 19, 1986, at which time there was no one present who objected to the
request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
i
Roland Ebent, Chairman
• Hutchinson Planning Commisson
9- �
RESOLUTION NO. 8357
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF LOADING DOCK IN IC -1 ZONE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: •
FINDINGS
1. Pure Culture Products of Hutchinson has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.12 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to allow the construction of an 18' by 40' loading dock on
property located at 35 Adams St and Washington Ave E, which is in an IC -1
zone, with the following legal description:
Lot 6, Block 46, North Half, City of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and
the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is
granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul c and
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
C�
J
?- Aj'.
(612) 587.5151
f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Francis Cannon
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
HISTORY
On July 25, 1986, Mr. Francis Cannon submitted an application for a condi-
tional use permit to allow the moving of a newly constructed house onto
property located on Lewis Avenue. A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 19, 1986, at which
time there was no one present who objected to the request.
• FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8358
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW MOVING OF HOUSE TO LOT ON LEWIS AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: .
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Francis Cannon of Darwin, Minnesota has made application to the
City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.02 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to allow the moving of a house onto a lot on Lewis Avenue,
with the following legal description:
Lot 6, Block 3, Stoney Point Addition, City of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and
the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional,Use Permit for the purpose designated is •
granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul . Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
(612) 587.5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
T0: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat of "Santelman's Second Addition"
as submitted by Kenneth Sante man
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary and
final plat.
HISTORY
On July 28, 1986, Mr. Kenneth Santelman submitted an application for a
preliminary and final plat to be known as "Santelman's Second Addition",
located west of Paul's Road and South of Hwy 7 E. A 7 lot plat of this
property had been previously approved in 1985. A public hearing was held
at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 19,
1986, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. Director of Engineering, Marlow Priebe submitted certification that the
proposed plat meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as
per Preliminary and Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned preliminary and final plat be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Preliminary 6 Final Plat
Santelman's Second Addition
I hereby certify that the Preliminary and Final Plat of Santelman's Second
Addition, as submitted now and previously, meets all the requirements of the
Subdivision Ordinance as per "PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT DATA".
No streets are being platted and all of the sanitary sewer and watermain are
inplace. The storm,sewer is inplace on Paul's Road. as
A "Subdivision Agreement" must be executed before the Final Plat is signed.
A Parks and Playground Contribution, in the amount of $478.94 for one dwelling
unit per lot, shall be submitted with the executed "Subdivision Agreement".
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
9-,P-
RESOLUTION NO. 8359
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND
FINAL PLAT OF SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION
• WHEREAS, Kenneth Santelman, owner and subdivider of the property
proposed to be platted as Santelman's Second Addition has submitted an
application for approval of the preliminary and final plat of said subdivision
in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance
Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
That part of Lot 3, Block 2, SANTELMAN'S ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof, described as beginning at the northeast corner of
said Lot 3; thence westerly, along the north line of said Lot 3 a
distance of 148.00 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the east line
of said plat, to the south line of said Lot 3; thence easterly, along
said south line, to the southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence
northerly, easterly and northerly along the east line of said Lot 3; to
the point of beginning, City of Hutchinson.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said plat of SANTELMAN'S SECOND ADDITION is hereby approved
40 and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the
laws of the State of Minnesota.
2. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of
this resolution in the office of the County Recorder for their use as required
by M.S.A. 462.358(3).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul L. Ac an
Mayor
ATTEST:
46 Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
(612) 587.5151
Harpy'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Amendment to Zoni
by the City of Hu
Ordinance #464 Section 7.09 as submitter
nson
Pursuant to Section 6.06 C1, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request to amend the Zoning
Ordinance.
HISTORY
In June of 1986, Building Official Homer Pittman brought to the attention of
the Planning Commission the need to change the requirements in Section 7.09
regarding decks. The Planning Commission set a public hearing for the July
meeting. Due to an error in the publication and additional changes, the
hearing was tabled and held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commis-
sion on Tuesday, August 19, 1986, at which time there was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All procedural requirements for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
have been complied with.
2. Notice was published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7,
1986.
3. The proposal was deemed to be appropriate and in the best interest of
the Ci ty.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned request to amend Zoning Ordinance #464 be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Ebent, Chairman
46 Hutchinson Planning Commisson
(612) 587.5151
Jff37
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
• WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planninq Commission
SUBJECT: Consideration of Registered Land Survey as submitted by
ichard Schmidtbauer
NOTE: In order to allow the Register of Deeds to simplify the legal
description for this property, that office requested that a new registered
land survey be considered. These findings will follow the same format as
for a preliminary plat.
The Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact
and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a proposed
registered land survey.
HISTORY
On July 29, 1986, Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer submitted an application for
consideration of a proposed registered land survey of his property.
A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, August 19, 1986, at which time there was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and maps were submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, August 7, 1986.
3. Director of Engineering, Marlow Priebe submitted certification that the
registered land survey as submitted is complete.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the afore-
mentioned registered land survey be approved.
Respectfully submitted,
Roland Eben t, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
(612) 587.5151
HUTCH/ CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST 40<j
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
_00,00,11V
M E M O
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Registered Land Survey
Richard Schmidtbauer
I hereby certify that Registered Land Survey, as submitted, is complete. The
RIS is required by the County Recorder for improved descriptions. All of the
land within the RLS is proposed to be subdivided in several plats in the
future.
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
0
RESOLUTION NO. 8363
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY OF RICHARD SCHMIDTBAUER PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Richard Schmidtbauer, owner of the property proposed for a
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY has submitted an application for approval said
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY in the manner required, under the Hutchinson
Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said registed land survey is in all respects consistent with
the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said registered land survey is situated upon the following
described lands in McLeod County, to -wit;
A tract of land in Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, City of
Hutchinson
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY is hereby approved and accepted by
the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans
and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be
conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the owner and City
officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such RLS to
be placed on record forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
(612) 587-5151
f/UTCH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of PLAZA HEIGHTS
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned final plat be approved, subject to subdivision
agreement being executed and parks and playground contribution
being paid before the final plat is signed.
0
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Final Plat of Plaza Heights
I hereby certify that the Final Plat of Plaza Heights, submitted to the City,
together with previous data submitted, meets all the requirements of the
Subdivision Ordinance, as per "FINAL PLAT DATA".
A "Subdivision Agreement" must be executed before the Final Plat is signed. A
Parks and Playground Contribution, in the amount of $2,973.86, for -one dwelling
unit per lot, shall be submitted with the executed Subdivision Agreement.
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8360
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
OF PLAZA HEIGHTS ADDITION
WHEREAS, Larry Herrman and Dennis Albertson, owners and subdividers of
the property proposed to be platted as PLAZA HEIGHTS ADDITION have submitted
an application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the
manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code,
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 of LIPKE ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof. The South Half of the North Half of the
Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 12, Township 116
North, Range 30 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian. The North 30.00
feet of the South Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West of the Fifth
Principal Meridian, City of Hutchinson.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
• 1. That said plat of PLAZA HEIGHTS ADDITION is hereby approved
and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. P10tZ
• City Administrator
(612) 587-5151
HarcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planninq Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Woodridge Addition
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned final plat be approved.
9-r
r% (612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
H,UTCHINSON, .MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Final Plat
Woodridge Subdivision
I hereby certify that the Final Plat of Woodridge Subdivision, submitted to the
City, meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, as per "FINAL
PLAT DATA".
Enclosed is a copy of the "Subdivision Agreement" for Woodridge Subdivision
for your approval. 40
Marlon V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/PV
enc.
0
��T
RESOLUTION NO. 8361
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
OF WOODRIDGE ADDITION
WHEREAS, Kevin Compton and Pat Mikulecky, owners and subdividers of the
property proposed to be platted as WOODRIDGE ADDITION have submitted
an application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the
manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code,
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
The south 100.00 feet of Government Lot 3 and the north 315.00 feet of
Government Lot 4, Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West of the
Fifth Principal Meridian, except the east 495.00 feet thereof, City of
Hutchinson.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said plat of WOODRIDGE ADDITION is hereby approved
and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws
• of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
ATTEST:
•
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
WOODRIDGE SUBDIVISION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth
hereinafter, by and between LeRoy R. Klammer and Ruth Klammer, Kevin R.
Compton and Carolyn F. Compton and Patrick M. Mikulecky, hereinafter called
the "Subdivider", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal corporation in the
County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of a tract of land in
Government Lots 3 and 4 of Section 35, Township 117 North, Range 30 West, to
be known as WOODRIDGE SUBDIVISION, which is located in the City of Hutchinson,
McLeod County, Minnesota, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance 464 AND 466 requires subdividers to make certain
improvements in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Subdivider hereby petitions for the grading, gravel sub -base,
sanitary sewer, watermain, sanitary sewer and watermain services,
storm sewer on Campbell Lane to serve the entire plat and for a 6"
the line in Block 2 for rear yard drainage, all as shown on the
• preliminary plat.
It is understood and agreed that said improvements will be
constructed in 1987. The Subdivider waives all rights to a Public
Hearing and appeal for the cost of the improvements. The waiving of
all such rights shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the Subdivider.
It is understood and agreed that the total cost of the improvement
will be assessed on a per lot basis in an equal amount to each lot in
the Subdivision.
2. The Subdivider hereby petitions for gravel base, curb and gutter and
surfacing on Campbell Lane to serve the entire plat.
It is understood and agreed that said improvements will be
constructed under more than one contract, beginning in 1988 dr later
as deemed feasible by the Subdivider and City. The Subdivider waives
all rights to a Public Hearing and appeal for the cost of the
improvements. The waiving of all such rights shall be binding upon
and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of
the Subdivider.
It is understood and agreed that the total costs of each improvement
will be assesses on a per lot basis in an equal amount to each lot in
• the Subdivision.
3. It is understood and agreed that there is a deferred cost of $555.00
per dwelling unit, plus interest from October 1, 1985, for the
inplace Lift Station in Clark's Second Addition, that serves this
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
WOODRIDGE SUBDIVISION
PAGE 2
Subdivision, as per Assessment Roll No. 202.
It is understood and agreed that the cost, plus interest, shall be
paid at the time a Building Permit is requested.
It is understood and agreed that this payment shall be binding upon
and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of
the Subdivider.
4. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider will make a cash
contribution to the City of Hutchinson Parks and Playground for
WOODRIDGE SUBDIVISION in the amount of $1,359.82, which is for one
dwelling unit per lot. Charges for additional dwelling units per lot
will be due at the time a Building Permit is issued and the cost will
be according to the City Fee Schedule for additional units at the
time said permit is issued.
5. It shall be the responsibility of the developer to clear any trees
and/or debris from utility easements, as per the request of the
utility prior to installation of the facility.
6. It is understood and agreed that all electrical and gas lines in
easements that may have to be moved by request of the property owner,
will be done at said property owners expense.
1. It is understood and agreed that to fulfill City Policy, two trees
will be provided in the margin (boulevard) of each lot. The
Subdivider or property owner shall purchase from the City and pay one
half the cost of said trees and the City's portion of the payment for
the trees shall not exceed $10.00 per tree. Said trees shall be
planted by the property owner.
The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to install two trees per lot
and assess the properties in the subdivision, the cost less allowed
City's portion of said cost. Said installation to be included in the
last assessable improvement to be installed for the subdivision. All
trees installed at the time of said last assessable improvement will
be credited to the properties where the trees are located.
Species selection will be determined by the Tree Board. Should the
Subdivider or property owner wish to plant a tree which deviates from
the selected specie list, he/she must present his/her request to the
Tree Board.
The City will, at no charge to the property owner, replace any tree
which dies within one year of the time of planting.
8. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
9. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office •
and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is
recorded.
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
WOODRIDGE SUBDIVISION
PAGE 3
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said LeRoy R. Klammer and Ruth Klammer, have hereunto
set their hands this day of , 19_; and Kevin R. Compton and
Carolyn F. Compton, have hereunto set their hands this day of ,
19_; and Patrick M. Mikulecky has hereunto set his hand this day of
, 19
LeRoy R. Klammer
Kevin R. Compton
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
Ruth Klammer
Carolyn F. Compton
Patrick M. Mikulecky
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 19__, by LeRoy R.
Klammer and Ruth Klammer, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 19_, by Kevin R.
Compton and Carolyn F. Compton, husband and wife.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
COUNTY OF this day of , 19 , by Patrick M.
Mikulecky.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
0
SUBDIVISE SUBDIV��N
VOODRIDG , 19_•
PAGE 4day of
Approved by the City Council on the �_
c1TY OF HUTCHINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
g acknoWledged before me
foregoing instrument Wa 19— by Paul L•
The foreB day of �— —' City Clerk.
STATE OF MINKESOTA this Mayor and Gary • pl°tz,
COUNTY OF �— Ackland, D
CountYl
Minnesota
Notary Public, Expires My Commission Exp
0
C�
•
40
(612) 587-5151
yarcH' . CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 20, 1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Final Plat of Schmidtbauer's Third Addition
It is the recommendation c° the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned final plat be approved.
E
RESOLUTION NO. 8362
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
OF SCHMIDTBAUER'S THIRD ADDITION
WHEREAS, Richard Schmidtbauer, owner and subdivider of the property .
proposed to be platted as SCHMIDTBAUER'S THIRD ADDITION has submitted an
application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the manner
required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all
proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
Legal Description: That part of Tracts Q, R, S and U of Registered Land
Survey NO. 1, McLeod County, described as commencing at the northwest
corner of said Tract Q a distance of 7.00 feet to the northeast corner of
SCHMIOTBAUER'S FIRST ADDITION, and the point of beginning of the land to be
described; thence South 6 degrees, 54 minutes 13 seconds East, along the
east line of said SCHMIDTBAUER'S FIRST ADDITION, a distance of 150.05 feet
to the southeast corner of said Addition; thence North 88 degrees 03
minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 270.95 feet; thence South 82 degrees
23 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 168.26 feet to a point on the
easterly line of said Tract U, distanct 30.00 feet southerly of the
northeast corner of said Tract U; thence northerly a distance of 30.00
feet to said northeast corner of Tract U; thence easterly along the
southerly line of said Tract S to the southeat corner of said Tract S;
thence northerly along the easterly line of said Tract S to the northeast
corner of said Tract S; thence westerly, along the north line of said
Tracts S, R and Q, to the point of beginning.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said plat of SCMIDTBAUER'S THIRD ADDITION is hereby approved
and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws
of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1986.
ATTEST:
an
Mayor
•
E
Gary -D. Plotz
City Administrator
;(612) 587.5151
H�r�H CITY OF HUTCHINSON
?i A'✓c,NUc NEST
M E M O
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Planning Commission and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Final Plat
Schmidtbauer's Third Addition
I hereby certify that the Final Plat of Schmidtbauer's Third Addition,
submitted to the City, meets all the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance
as per "FINAL PLAT DATA".
MVP/pv
enc.
40
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
Enclosed
is a copy
of the "Subdivision
Agreement" for Schmidtbauer's Third
•
Addition
for your
approval.
MVP/pv
enc.
40
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
SUBDIQISSOTHIRRE TION
EMENT
SCHMIDCBTyjTy OF HUTCHINSON
year set forth
the day and Y hereinafter
entered into Sohmi Municipal
corporation
made and Beatrice iclpal "City";
THIS AGREEMENT, chard anof Hutchinson, a M� alled the
and between R1 City
hereinafter, by " and the hereinafter
called the "Subdivider , State of Minnesota,
in the County of McLeod,
WITNESSETH a certain
d developer °f ted in the
the owner an which is lova
the Subdivider is ,S TRIAD ADDITION,
WHEREAS, as SCHMIDTBAUEA
subdivision known and;
subdividers to make
City of Hutchinson, 464 and 466 requires
WHEREAS, City
or
No.
in the subdivision;
certain improvements REBy AGREED AS FOLL0WS.
Now, THEREFORE, IT IS RE sewer main and
d that the sanitary d Jefferson Street.
Century Avenue an base and storm
1, It is understood and nagree lied on C base, bituminous a on Lot
in has been i �ytter, Gravel That the hour
waterma d Century Avenue -
in addition, °� installed on sewer and water.
sewer has been i connected to sanitaryell sanitary
is presently °°nn Subdivider will ins iine for all
d agree that the Subdi erty
ervlCes fs� the mains to the prop instal
to
2. It is understood anlace. Said i any lot in the
seper and water a services inP
do not have said s to is issued for
lots that before a "Building fermi
be completed
plat. r improvements on Century Avenue have
ments fo
3• The following assess
on
been deferred Roll NO. 194'
5 4 295.03 Plus 6} Interest
Tract Q - # 4'618.32 Plus 6} Interest
Tract R 15,888.67 Plus 6} Interest ect T3-24
Tract S - } eats on Jefferson Street Pte
the imPrOvem
eet was 512.33 Per foot
of said PT'OJ53• The cost is
The
assessmenteC�ed The Costas per Roll N°
have been to of 7%,
with an interest
assigned to the plat
52,096.10'
4, The deferred assessments shall be activated and
as follows, 4 852,80 plus 6} Interest
Roll No. 194 _ $4,852.80 Plus 6} Interest
Lot 1 Roll No. 80 plus 6} Interest
Lot 2 _ X94 - 54,852• 6 Interest
Lot 3 - Roll N0• t94 - $5,930.02 Plus 6} Interest
Lot 4 _ Roll No' 194 - $4,313.60 plus } Interest
Lot 5 - Roll No- 53 - $1,233.00 plus 7}
Lot 6 _ Roll N°• 53 _ $ 863.10 Plus 7} Interest
Lot 7 - Roll No- Century Avenue.
5 A wear surface overlay is programmed for
L�
0
C�
The year of
L
said construction has not been determined at this time. The future
assessment to this plat, for the overlay, will be on Lots 1, 2, 39 4
and 5.
6. Future street widening improvement is programmed for Jefferson
Street. The year of said construction has not been determined. The
improvement consists of curb and gutter, grading, gravel base,
bituminous base and bituminous wear surface. The future assessment
to this plat for the widening will be on Lots 6 and 7.
7. It is understood and agreed, that the Parks and Playground
Contribution has been fulfilled by the platting of the "Park" in
Schmidtbauer's Second Addition.
8. It shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to clear trees
and/or debris from utility easements, as per the request of the
utility prior to installation of the facility.
9. It is understood and agreed that all electrical and gas lines in
easements that may have to be moved by request of the property owner,
will be done at said property owners expense.
10. It is understood and agreed that to fulfill City Policy, two trees
will be provided 1n the margin (boulevard) of each lot. The
Subdivider or property owner shall purchase from the City and pay one
half the cost of said trees and the City's portion of the payment for
the trees shall not exceed $10.00 per tree. Said trees shall be
planted by the property owner.
• The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to install two trees per lot
and assess the properties in the subdivision, the cost less allowed
City's portion of said cost. Said installation to be included in
the last assessable improvement to be installed for the subdivision.
All trees installed at the time of said last assessable improvement
will be credited to the properties where the trees are located.
Species selection will be determined by the Tree Board. Should the
Subdivider or property owner wish to plant a tree which deviates from
the selected specie list, he/she must present his/her request to the
Tree Board.
The City will, at no charge to the property owner, replace any tree
which dies within one year of the time of planting.
11. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs,
representatives, assigns and successors of the parties.
12. It is understood and agreed that it is the responsibility of the
Subdivider to record this agreement at the County Recorder's Office
and that no Building Permits will be issued until said Agreement is
recorded.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said Richard Schmidtbauer and Beatrice Schmidtbauer,
• have hereunto set their hands this _ day of 19_
Richard Schmidtbauer Beatrice Schmidtbauer
SLATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
was aclmowledged before as
foregoing instrument19 _+ by Richard
The foreg day of
this er at1 �dtbauer, husband and
d rice Sc
$eathm1
Sehmidtbau
wife.
CountY+ Minnesota
Notary Pub11c,
MY COMMission Expires
19_
Approved by the City Council on the
day of
CITY OF NUTCiiINSON
Its Mayor
Its City Clerk
foregoing
instrument was acknowledged before me
19_+ by Paul L.
The day of _��' City Clerk•
STATE OF 14 this this
or and Gary D• Plotz,
COUNTY OF �� Ackland, MaY
Count y+
Minnesota
Notary Public, ir
MY Commission Exp
E
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
• Tuesday, August 19, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Roland Ebent at
7:35 p.m., with the following members present: Marlin Torgerson, Larry
Romo, Spencer Beytien and Chairman Ebent. Members absent: Elsa Young,
Shu -Mei Hwang, and Thomas Lyke. Also present: Director of Engineering
Marlow V. Priebe and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, July 15, 1986. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Ebent noted that the request as per publication #3600 had been
withdrawn and a hearing on that item would not be held at this meeting.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING AS SUBMITTED BY ISD #423 AND CITY
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3592, as published in the Hutchinson Leader
• on Thursday, August 7, 1986. The request is for the rezoning o
property located on along the east side of Glen Street across from
the elementary school from R-2 (Multiple Family Residence) to C-3
(Central Commercial) for the purpose of providing a parking lot for
the elementary school, and to further provide an unrestricted
rearyard setback for the proposed police department.
Director Priebe explained the request, noting that the affected
area adjoins property already zoned C-3.
Superintendent of Schools, Glen Matejka stated that the school had
an option to purchase the property contingent upon the approval of
the rezoning. He further stated that they don't intend to fully
pursue the project until the summer of 1987. They would eventually
blacktop the parking surface, the date depending upon results of
soil testing.
Mr. Louis Brunner, 957 Hayden Avenue, owner of affected property on
125 Glen Street stated his concern about future street assessments
for residential property in commercial zoning. Director Priebe
explained that as long as the properties remained residential, the
assessment for commercial use would be deferred until such time the
use of the property became commercial. Mr. Brunner also asked if a
variance couldn't be granted, rather than rezoning.
• City Attorney Schaefer stated that the advantage of rezoning was
that it would bring that area into conformance with the city's
comprehensive plan. It was also pointed out that a variance cannot
1
be granted for "use" of a property but applies to setbacks, lot
size, etc.
Mrs. Florence Saterlee, 130 Washington Ave W, raised a question •
about Glen Street being the only street that wasn't a 9 -ton street.
Director Priebe responded that 1st Avenue wasn't a 9 -ton street.
He further explained that Washington Avenue was a designated truck
route because it is a state aid street.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed
at 7:50 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the rezoning as requested. Seconded by Mr.
Romo, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY CLARENCE AND
DELORIS FREITAG
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3593 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, August 19, 1986. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the operation of a boarding and lodging home for
the elderly on property located at 615 Brown Street.
Mr. Freitag was present to explain that they were doing everything
requested by the City necessary for approval of the request. He
had submitted a copy of their license from the State of Minnesota,
had installed smoke detectors in every bedroom and were willing to
install an egress window in the basement bedroom as recommended by •
the Fire Marshal and Building Official. A survey of the property
was presented. The parking area was not shown on the survey, but
it was the consensus of the commission that there was enough space
available for the 6 spaces required for such an operation. Mr.
Freitag also noted that he owned other property nearby that could
be used for parking. Director Priebe explained that the parking
had to be provided on the lot where the boarding house was in
operation.
Mr. Freitag further explained that they have only one resident that
requires a wheel chair. He stated that the state inspector had
told them to not accept any new residents that are bedridden or
wheel chair patients.
Discussion followed. Chairman Ebent expressed his concern about
the density created by this type of use in an R-2 zone.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed
at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to smoke detectors
being installed in each bedroom unit, installation of an egress
window in the basement bedroom, the placement of a pipe from safety
relief valve on the hot water heater within 6" of the floor, as
recommended by the fire marshal, and also subject to a drawing •
being submitted to staff indicating minimum parking requirements, a
E
gravel surface being completed this year, and a blacktopped surface
being completed according to City Ordinance. Seconded by Mr.
• Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BY PURE
CULTURE PRODUCTS
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3594, as published in the Hutchinson -Leader
on Thursday, August 7, 1986. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the construction of a 18' by 40' concrete block
loading dock addition on property located at 35 Adams St. N.
Mr. Dick McClure and Mr. Julius Rainwater were present to explain
the request.
There was discussion about whether or not the semis unloading will
be a traffic hazzard. It was pointed out that the new loading dock
will be an improvement, as the loading and unloading will be done
faster and the trailers will not extend out into the street right-
of-way. The major problem will be the extension into the railroad
right-of-way. There was no one at the hearing representing the
railroad.
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing.
Seconded by Mr. Romo, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 8:12 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
• recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as
requested. Seconded by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried
unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY FRANCES
CANNON
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3595 as published in the Hutchinson -Leader
on Thursday, August 7, 1986. The request is for a conditional use
permit to allow the moving of a newly constructed house onto
property located on Lewis Avenue.
Mr. Cannon was present to explain the request. He explained that
house was built by a high school building class, and it met all
codes and regulations. He submitted photgraphs of the house to be
moved.
After discussion, Mr. Beytien made a motion to close the hearing.
seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously and the
hearing was closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Beytien made a motion to
recommend to City Council approval of the conditional use permit as
requested. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried
unanimously.
• (e) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF 'SANTELMAN'S
SECOND ADDITION'
3
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. with reading
publication #3599 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, August 7, 1986. •
Director Priebe explained that this same property had been
previously platted as 7 lots. He stated that Mr. Santelman had
changed his plan and intends to constuct multiple family dwellings
(twin homes or 4-plexes) and has adjusted the lot sizes
accordingly. Director Priebe also submitted certification that the
plat is in compliance with the requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance as per Preliminary and Final Plat Data.
City Attorney Schaefer stated that he had no objection to running
this as both a preliminary and final plat as all the necessary data
has been provided and the property had been previously considered
regarding drainage and elevation.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Romo, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed at
8:19 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council
approval of the preliminary and final plat as submitted. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS SUBMITTED BY NORM AND
LINDA PONSFORO
REQUEST WITHDRAWN
(G) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #464 SECTION 7.09
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:20 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3597 as published in the Hutchinson Leader
on Thursday, August 7, 1986. The request is to change wording
in Section 7.09 YARD SPACE ENCROACHMENTS - PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS,
in order to clarify and update the wording as well as allow for
larger (12' wide) decks.
This hearing had been tabled from the previous meeting due to
publication error and additional changes. It was the consensus of
the staff and commission that the amendments as published on August
7 are accurate and in the best interest of the city.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was closed
at 8:21 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City Council
approval of the amendments as proposed. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson,
the motion carried unanimously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF REGISTERED LAND SURVEY SUBMITTED BY RICHARD
SCHMIDTBAUER
Chairman Ebent opened the public hearing at 8:21 p.m. with the
reading of publication #3601 as published in the Hutchinson Leader •
on Thursday, August 7, 1986. The request is for a new registered
land survey to allow for an improved legal description of this
4
property.
• Mr. Schmidtbauer was present to explain that the McLeod County
Register of Deeds had requested the new RLS. Director Priebe
provided certification that the proposed RLS is complete and that
the land within it is proposed to be subdivided into several plats
in the future.
Mr. David Jensen, trustee for the Marvin Horneman estate, was
present to state his concern about drainage problems that might be
caused by future development of the aforementioned property. Dis-
cussion followed.
Mr. Beytien made a motion to close the public hearing. Seconded by
Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously and the hearing was
closed at 8:30 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the new Registered Land Survey as proposed.
Seconded by Mr. Torgerson, the motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF PLAZA HEIGHTS
• Director Priebe explained that the City Council had previously
approved the preliminary plat of PLAZA HEIGHTS as recommended by
the Planning Commission, contingent upon the developer getting an
easement from the adjoining property owner for what is now "Chicago
Street. The developer not to pursue the easement but to change the
plat somewhat, eliminating some of the lots with driveways onto
South Grade Road and eliminating the question about two exits from
the plat. Director Priebe also provided certification that the
plat data submitted meets all the requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance, as per "FINAL PLAT DATA."
After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the final plat as submitted, subject to
subdivision agreement being executed and parks and playground
contribution being paid before the final plat is signed. Seconded
by Mr. Beytien, the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF WOODRIDGE ADDITION
Director Priebe explained that there were no changes from the
preliminary plat previously approved. He also submitted
certification stating that the final plat meets all the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, as per "FINAL PLAT
DATA."
• After discussion, Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City
Council approval of the final plat. Seconded by Mr. Romo, the
motion carried unanimously.
(c)
(d)
CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF SCHMIDTBAUER'S THIRD ADDITIONre no •
Director Priebe explained that there WeHe alsohsubmittedes m the
preliminary plat previously
the final plat meets all the
certification stating as per "FINAL PLAT
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance,
DATA."
motion to After discussion Mr. Torgerson mat a Seconded byrMr mBeytien,mend to Cthe
Council approval of the final p
motion carried unanimously.
DISCUSSION OF BOARDING HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY
There was discussion about how to further regulate boarding homes
for the elderly o large em enough to serve sthe 1peoplel as to allow h
make more saf number of who
only on P P there.
might be living homes, it was
In response to requiring a City license for boarding
the City inspect the
pointed out that other businesses would probably also have to e
licensed. In response to having ualified to
establishments and in turn report violations to the State, it was
pointed out that the inspector would have value
o q
utritio if the City were to inspect and
inspect for things such as nutritional value of meals, etc. There
might also be a liability q •
fail to report a violation for whatever reason.
he
ls
After sdislussion, it wasn shouldt the
hbecwithnsafety us of tOf the mstructure aitself
.
City
It was suggested that this is similar to the rental hd with ousing
registration question and could possibly be address and whetheror
homes should be allowed in an R-2
Another concern raised was the question of density all o need for this
not these lodging and boarding
zone. Looking at the zoning map, and recognizing
type of housing, it was suggested that it might be better handled
by putting restrictions on this type of use in terms of lot size,
required square footage per occupant, for example.
staff was directed to come up with possible ideas
After discussion,
regarding the Zoning requirements for boarding homes for the
elderly for the next meeting.
6- ADJOURNMENT
business, Mr. Tothermotion carried unanimously
on made a motion to adjourn
There being no further
the meeting. Seconded by Mr. Beytien, the m
and the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 P.m -
11
(612) 587-5151
W. -"
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WAQHINGTON AVENUE WEST
.FCh'/P,'SON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: August 26, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Letting No. 11
Letting No. 13
Attached are the required resolutions setting bid date for September 9th, 1986,
at 2:00 P.M. for Letting No. 11 - Waller Drive Project and Letting No. 13 -
Woodridge Subdivision Project.
•
MVP/PV
attachment
0
y-Q�
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS •
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 11
PROJECT NO. 86-11
Resolution No. 8369
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resclution passed by the council on August 12th,
1986, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of Waller Drive from 6th Avenue N.E. to 2501 North by the
construction of Curb and Gutter and Appurtenances, and has presented such
plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under
such approved plans and specifications. The ad:•ertisement shall be published
for ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will
be opened and considered by the council at 2:00 P.M. on September 9th, 19869
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the
clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Mayor
City Administrator
n
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
. LETTING NO. 13
PROJECT NO. 86-13
Resolution No. 8370
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 12th day of August,
1986, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of
Campbell Lane in Clark's 2nd Addition to East Line of Woodridge Subdivision by
the construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm
Sewer and Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, the hearing has been scheduled to be held thereon on the 9th
day of September, 1986, with ten days' published notice of the hearing through
two weekly publications of the required notice, at which all persons desiring
to be heard will be given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council
resolution adopted the 12th day of August, 1986.
2. Marlow V. Priebe is hereby designated as the engineer for this
• improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of August, 1986.
City Administrator
0
Mayor
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS •
LETTING NO. 13
PROJECT NO. 86-13
Resolution No. 8371
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the council on August 26th,
1986, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of Campbell Lane in Clark's 2nd Addition to East Line of Woodridge
Subdivision by the construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain, Storm Sewer and Appurtenances, and has presented such
plans and specifications to the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under
such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published
for ten days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will •
be opened and considered by the council at 2:00 P.M. on September 9th, 1986,
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota, and that no
bids will be considered unless seal^d .and filed with the clerk and accompanied
by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the
clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the council this 26th day of August, 1986.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
r
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING August 26, 1986
• WATER & SEWER FUND
*Hutchinson Telephone Co.
phone service
$ 241.97
*D.O.E.R.
social security
868.80
Davies Water Equipment
parts
1722.80
Donohue & Associates
professional fees
4699.00
No. Central Sec. AWWA
registration fees
65.00
Reliance Electric
parts
74.78
Viking Safety Products
sign & coveralls
84.70
Firemans Schools ins.
Sept. LTD ins.
48.81
Fadden Pump Co.
supplies
17.57
Logis
computer charges
441.48
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
Sept. life ins.
48.67
Mn. Valley Testing Lab
testing
112.50
Nalco Chemical Co.
chemicals
73.26
Power Process Equipment
part
35.00
Quades
repairs
78.48
Rutz Plbg & Htg.
parts
22.43
PERA
contribution
249.70
Sun Life of Canada
Sept. dental ins.
146.61
UBC
supplies
10.95
social security
$ 9,042.51
First Trust Co. of ST. Paul
interest
20,811.50
$29,854.01
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*D.O.E.R.
social security
$
146.56
Old Dominion Brush
parts
287.96
Firemans Schools Ins.
Sept. LTD ins.
6.79
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
Sept. life ins.
6.51
Public Employees Retirement Assn.
contribution
44.20
Sun Life of Canada
Sept. dental ins.
22.67
$
514.69
GENERAL FUND
*Govt. Finance Officers Assn.
publication
$
27.50
*Firstate Federal Savings
poles for baseball lighting
7860.00
*Hutchinson Telephone Co.
phone service
2877.91
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
59.00
*Dept. of Natural Resources
ORV registration fees
4.00
*D.O.E.R.
social security
6401.65
*Commissioner of Revenue
arena sales tax
73.50
*Dept. of Natural REsources
boat registration fees
40.00
*Dept. of Natural Resources
snowmobile registration fees
55.00
. 1980 Tax INcrement Debt Service
transfer of funds
5510.00
National Arbor Day Foundation
annual dues
10.00
Anderson Interiors Inc.
brushes & stain
7.13
Central Contractors Supply
supplies
3.00
//-Lq-
T -2-
Express Photo
film finish
$ 7.76
Fire Inst. Assn. Mn.
registration fees
20.00
1986 State Fire Chiefs Conf.
registration fees
95.00
Linder Bus Co.
bus rental
28.00
Luxor Lighting
lites
38.10
Mn. Public Transit Assn.
registration fee
70.00
Mn. Flyer Magazine
advertising for manager
19.20
Otto's Tree Service
stump removal
424.00
Otto's Tree Service
stump removal
719.29
Pizza Hut
supplies
67.39
State Treasurer
license renewal
15.00
Timothy J. Clark
video cassettes
47.50
Thompson Pub. Group
labor handbook
146.00
Bruce Ericson
meeting
6.48
Marlin Torgerson
league conference
85.28
JAMES Weckman
gasoline pumped airport
19.12
Mike Larson
steel toed boots
30.00
Jodi Galles
scoreboard operator
23.45
Tim Van Hove
scoreboard operator
25.12
Marcella Bayere
camp refund
15.00
Lanny Waalen
swimming refund
21.00
Janel Reiter
swimming refund
10.00
Jeeva Seevaratnam
swimming refund
10.00
Nancy Redetzke
city picnic
940.71
Abbott Electronics
repair
5.00
Bennett Office Supplies
repairs & supplies.
97.10
•
Ben Franklin Store
supplies
3.07
Central Mn. Com. Inc.
repairs
56.00
Carneys
2 glue
3.78
Country Kitchen
prisoner meal
5.41
Co. Treasurer
DL fees
102.00
Communication Auditors
batteries & pager case
60.89
Don Streicher Guns
filters
34.45
Co. Recorder
recording satisfaction
10.00
Co. Recorder
filing Ordinance
10.00
Eileen Goeders
contract payment -Sept.
1500.00
Ericksons
supplies
9.49
Ed Davis Bus. Machines
supplies
179.10
Firemans Schools Ins.
Sept. LTD ins.
602.28
Family Rexall Drug
supplies
32.86
Great Plains Supply
supplies
136.49
G.F. Nemitz Sons
supplies
53.65
Hutch Drug
supplies
4.17
Hutch Landscaping
brushes & trees
280.00
Hutch MFg. & Sales
part
36.45
Henrys Candy Co.
supplies
291.50
Hutch Utilities
clear lamps & mercury vapor
475.00
ICMA Retirement
contribution
226.93
Insurance Planners
agent fees
3949.95
Johnson Super Valu
tiny tots supplies
12.44
•
Joes Sport Shop
K Mart
sweaters -pants -tank tops
supplies
255.00
14.57
League of Mn. Cities
quarterly ins. payment
43,228.00
Logis
computer charges
5083.72
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
Sept. life ins.
497.55
-3-
Mini Biff
biff rental
$ 18.35
•
Midland Products
supplies
142.42
Midcontinent Theatre
50 tickets
125.00
Mpls. Star
26 week subscription
40.30
NW Bell
leased phone line
326.50
North American Cable Systems
basic cable
6.63
Peterson Bus Service
2 trips
615.00
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp.
mail mach/scale rental
102.00
Quades
repairs
705.97
R. L. Polk Co.
4 Polk directories
192.00
PERA
contribution
3865.36
Sun Life of Canada
Sept. dental ins.
1535.60
James Schaefer
legal services
3317.00
Turf Supply Co.
chemicals
345.60
Uniforms Unlimited
battery and name plates
80.25
UBC
supplies
32.27
Xerox Corporation
supplies
186.30
$ 94,705.69
Pool & Rec. Const Debt Service
Am. NationalBank of St. Paul
interest
22,387.50
Bonds of 1985
Bethke Construction
est. #6 final
889.84
•
1st Trust Bank of St. Paul
interest
48,206.25
48,096.09
1985 Tax Inc. Debt Service
1st Trust Co. of St. Paul
interest
5,450.00
Bonds of 1986
Wm. Mueller & Sons
est. #3 final
61.50
Ronald McGraw
refund of assessment
paid
148.75
Chris McCue
refund of assessment
paid
280.00
Jerry Janicke
refund of assessment
paid
303.28
Mabel Vacek
refund of assessment
paid
262.50
Timothy Opatz
refund of assessment
paid
297.50
Richard Schmidtbauer
refund of assessment
paid
297.50
$ 1,651.03
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE FUND
Ed Phillips & Sons
wine & liquor
2333.60
Quality Wine &Spirits
wine & liquor
1278.70
Twin City Wine Co.
wine & liquor
1672.82
City of Hutchinson
payroll
4648.88
D.O.E.R_
social security
535.14
Commissioner of Revenue
July sales tax
9569.70
Commissioner of Revenue
June sales tax balance
4351.87
•
PERA
contribution
145.31
$ 24,536.02
L
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON Q/1V1fO/�
r, 'JNJr1O1V
DATE: August 12, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: Grading, Gravel Base, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer
Improvement Project
Gentlemen:
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is
feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a
hearing be held on the 9th day of September, 1986.
PROJECT NO. 86-13: Campbell Lane in Clark's Second Addition to East Line of
Woodridge Subdivision by the construction of Grading,
Gravel Base, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and
Appurtenances
• Construction Cost
Engineering
Fiscal and Miscellaneous
Land Acquisition
Capitalized Interest
# 64,800.00
4,540.00
4,540.00
0.00
5,180.00
TOTAL--------------------------------$ 79,060.00
Assessable Cost
Deferred Assessable Cost
City Cost
TOTAL --------------------------------
$ 79,060.00
Respectfully submitted,
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
0.00
0.00
060.00
AGENDA ITEM FOR SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 MEETING
HUTCHINSON PUBLIC SCHOOLS
GEORGE GORDON, Ch.b ..
"NALD POPP. Cieh
DRA GREEN, Tf.a
August 21, 1986
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 423 D.WAYNEPETEDSON.Vk.Cha
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 DANIEL PERRDIED I
LUCI I E
ARLT. Db.ta
Glenn Matelka, Superintendent of Schools , ^] 06. 4
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland
Members of the City Council
Hutchinson City Hall
Hutchinson, MN 55350
�0
b �
6
RE: Assessment Roll #221, Tract in Section 1-116-30 FSR YO�
(water main to elementary school site, School Road area) 1NirO^�
Gentlemen:
AT/0N
The Hutchinson School District has great concern on the city council's proposed
action to change the city's assessment policy for the above mentioned project.
This change increases school district cost by an amount over $6000 above the
cost budgeted when the previous assessment policy was used to determine cost.
The bond issue amount was based on the city policy in effect at the time.
The district's greatest concern is will the policy also be changed so that
storm and sanitary sewer will also cost more than budgeted because of city
• council policy change? The school district requests that additional policy
change will not be the case.
It has come to our attention that the major drive behind this change is that
the cost can be spread over a larger tax base - the school district. Please
be reminded that for this project the district is limited by voter action on
the bond issue amount. These increased utility costs will have to come from
the bond issue amount thereby forcing a reduction somewhere else in the pro-
ject. The end result will be a lessor facility than presented to the voters.
An early response to the total issue -- city policy change for assessment on
this school project, especially the storm/sanitary sewer question is needed as
bids are scheduled to be let on August 29.
Thank you in advance for your additional consideration of this project.
Sincerely,
GLznn Matej a
Superintendent of Schools
for the Board of Education
cc:
DISTRICT OFFICES
30 GI.. S,r.., No"h
Ph... 16121589-2860
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Robe". R..d
Pho.. 1612)587-2151
School Board Membrs
AHEAVOLAn ONAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE
200 C.wury A.....
Ph... (612) 5873636
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Robe".Road
Pha.e 16M SI17.2856
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
100 Glm Svee�
Ph..1612)587-2837
(612) 587-5151
W
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 26, 1986
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Administrative Secretary
------------------------------
SUBJECT:— Contributions from Hutchinson Utilities for 1987— — — — —
Rufus Alexander called this afternoon to inform the City Council that
a letter would be forthcoming from the Hutchinson Utilities stating the
• Utilities contributions to the City of Hutchinson for 1987 will be approx-
imately $300,000.
cc: Ken Merrill
0
/ (612) 587-5151
Hv�rH'; CITY OF HUTCHINSON
/ 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUT C.-TNSON, ' NN 55350
M E M 0
DATE: August 18, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Faith Lutheran Church
TOR YOUR INFORMATION
Subsequent to your approval of the alley relocation, concrete surfacing and
sidewalk on the east side of Faith Lutheran Church structure on August 12,
1986, I contacted the utilities.
They reported back to me as follows:
• Hutchinson Utilities - Underground Power Line Inplace
Underground Gas Line Inplace
Hutchinson Telephone - Underground Telephone Lines or
Conduits Inplace
North American Cable - Underground Cable Line Inplace
Television
The contractor will have to notify all of the above, before construction
begins to have location and depth verified so as not to disturb or damage
the facilities.
��/�v (--
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
cc: Hutch Utilities - Rufus Alexander
Butch Wentworth
Ivan Larson
Hutch Telephone Company
• North American Cable Television
Miller, Miller & Mac, Inc.
Faith Lutheran Church, Thor Skeie, Senior Pastor
•
•
•
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
DATE: August 12, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: Drainage Improvement Project
Gentlemen:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is
feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a
hearing be held on the 9th day of September, 1986.
PROJECT NO. 86-14: Construction of Drainage Line, Inlets and Berne on Property
East of Robert's First Addition
Construction Cost ; 4,400.00
Engineering 308.00
Fiscal and Miscellaneous 308.00
Land Acquisition 0.00
Capitalized Interest 352.00
TOTAL -------------------------------- 5.368.00
Assessable Cost S 5,368.00
Deferred Assessable Cost 0.00
City Cost 0.00
TOTAL --------------------------------3 5.368.00
Respectfully submitted,
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
0
(612) 587.5151
r _;v CITY OF HUTCHINSON
✓v�S�'�"JGT�NAVc,NUf WEST
MINUTES AND MEETING NXICE
Community Energy Council
The CaTmmity Energy Council met at 7 p.m. on Monday, August 11,
1986, in the city council chambers. Present were:
Jay Beytien - Hugh Foster - Kenneth Prihoda - Butch Wentworth
Mayor Paul Ackland - Paul Helgeson (Dept of Energy/PC. Dev.)
Absent: Glenn Matejka
Mr. Helgeson was introduced by Mayor Ackland. He stated the meeting
had been called because there is the possibility of submitting a grant
application for September consideration by DEED, if it is the desire
of this canmittee. Grants may be for up to $15,000 with minimum of
10 percent local match. Any grant request for this finding cycle must
be in the mail by August 29, 1986.
Mr. Heigescn provided the camattee with information concerning options
that could be considered in setting up an energy program. Discussion
centered on the possibility of setting up a revolving loan fund for
commercial use, using available monies from the tax increment funds
of the city and/or from small cities loan money. Any grant that would
be received frau DEED would most likely be used for salary of a program
a&unistrator or for expenses of administering a cm m=ty energy program.
The Energy Council is to came to a decision as to whether it is
interested in pursuing a grant application this cycle. The suggestion
was made that Mayor Ackland should bring the information to the City
Council to determine whether they would support the apt.
of the Camnmity Energy Council will be
wi etermin a to go wi the application. If
"yes" it will be a work meeting to develop the framework of the
application.
Butch Wentworth will obtain a letter from Hutch Utilities prior to
the next meeting, stating their cavnitment to energy audits and an
ongoing program.
Recorder - Hazel Sitz Mailed 8-15-86 to manbers
vccpy: Gary Plotz
•
Ll
, ,6!2)587.5151
J Y OF HUTCHINSON
August 21, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AMID COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The twelfth annual appreciation picric was held this week. The Council's
input is requested concerning plans for future picnics. Your recm7rendations
about the following iterm could be discussed at the September 9 council
meeting.
1. Attendance at recent picnics has been around 300. Guest list attached.
Are there desired changes in the guest list?
2. This year's picnic location was the civic arena. In past years, it has
been held at Riverside Park, except for rain changes. What is your
preferred location?
3. Bids are requested frau 2 caterers. Low bidder this year and last year
was Nancy Redetzke.
Is the menu satisfactory? What changes are desired?
4. Free beer and pop have been available at all the picnics.
Should this be continued?
Should wine coolers be added?
5. We secured a band to play at the first 3 picnics (1975, 1976, 1977).
There is an occasional suggestion that we again have a band for dancing.
Should this be considered?
6. This year the recreation center was available for volleyball and basketball
the evening of the picnic. Swimming was planned, but rained out. At
Riverside Park, softball has been the main activity.
Are these activities adequate? Are these other suggested events?
7. Other concerns?
1986 Guest List - Picric August 20
1. All full time and part time eMloyees - seasonal -no guest.
2. All m cabers of boards and oamdasicns, including any recently resigned.
Exclude Hoard of Health.
Include ad hoc committees. This year - Central Prairie Railvay Assoc,
Caanunity Development Hoard of Directors, Cable TV Advisory Committee, Police
Station Building Camnittee, Charter Cawassian, Cam xaty Energy Council,
Solid Waste Management Camittee, Building Code Board of Appeals.
3. All volunteer fireven and reserve officers and part time dispatchers, plus
any recently retired firemen.
4. Librarians - Whittenberg, Levy, Henke, Antony, Erickson, Koehler, Myron Clapp.
5. Park Towers - Patty Stallm3n, Milt & Inkin Hanson.
Green Thumb - Runby, Red & Hughie Jerry
6. Administrators - Phil Graves, Mavis Geier, ftdnm Alexander, Butch. Wentworth,
Attorney Schaefer
7. School - Lennes, Donn Hoffman, Glenn Matejka, N. Mace m, Ran Jonas
8. Retired - Eric Smith, Clyde Drahos, Joe Getz, Bud Willard, Les Steinhaus,
Elmer Paulsen, Fred Roberts, Lila Westphal, Lloyd Schlueter, Stan
Koehler, FbIW Mix, Martin Dreyer
0
9. Past Maprx= - Iry Burich, Ford Rolfe, Sr., Earl Fitzloff, Shelby Svendsen, •
Leonard Johnson, Mrs. D.J. Blade, Mrs. f0th Wastlund, J`im DeMeyer,
Bob Stearns
10. News Media - Larry Graf, Virginia Peak, Cathy Nevanen, Jape Hodgins, Wayne
Taaich, Brett RVwussen
11. Cansultants, etc., - Jim J1ank[+.r, Bill Fahey, T404 -Chuck. Barger & Jil n Welday,
Archer Nelsen, Gary Blythe., Do nah m -Mike Hoff, Gary Warren -
Ministerial Association
(Firemen got notice at station - no letterl 180 letters mailed 1986
pTloyees got notice in newsletter " " )
responses - 325 meals
0
,ho �
• p Q
� F
�C
OF TaP!`y
August 20, 1986
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Hazel Sitz
Transit Coordinator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
RE: Capital Request
Dear Ms. Sitz:
Phone 296-7052
TOR YOUR INFORMATION
The Office of Transit has completed its review of capital requests for
transit vehicles and equipment. We have approved the purchase by your
transit system of one lift equipped bus up to a total cost of $45,000,
one radio up to a cost of $300 and the retrofiting of one wheelchair
securement device up to a total cost of $2,000. The vehicle is to be
• acquired through a competitive bid process with a minimum of three bids.
The state share will be paid from the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax fund and
is limited to $37,840 or 80 percent of the cost whichever is less.
Prior to obtaining bids, equipment specifications must be reviewed and
approved by your project manager. It will be important for you to develop
your specifications and go out for bids as soon as possible. This is
because the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax funds which are being used for
capital purchases must be programmed before the end of the State's bi-
ennium which is June 30, 1987. If ,-�u have not entered into a purchase
agreement by this date, the funds will revert back to the General fluid
and will not be available for your use.
If we can be of assistance in specification development or in sharing
experiences about various types of equipment, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Donna W. Allan
Project Manager
Transit Program Section
An Equu! Oppuriuoge Emp!<wer
n
U
•
•
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
3' WASHINGTON AVE,%UE WEST
HUTCH; "'SON. VNN 55350
M E M 0
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE: August 19, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Marka, Building Inspector
RE: Midwest Trailer Park
The following is an update on Midwest Trailer Park:
1) Mathew's Construction cleaned and repaired the sewer lines and repaired
the sewer connections under Trailers 8 & 10. The repair was inspected
and the lines appeared to have adequate flow. Trailer 11 works, but is
in need of a new service line between the trailer parks main and the
trailer.
2) Another complaint was received on August 18, 1986, from Ms. Karen Curtis,
tenant, on behalf of Ms. Edna Heil, tenant at Lot 16. The circumstances
of the complaint where that the toilet would not flush and the sinks were
backing up through the toilet. The situation was inspected and Mathews
Construction was verbally given an okay to repair this situation by Mr.
Sam Ulland and repairs were completed.
Hopefully, this is the conclusion of this situation.
Jim Marka
Building Inspector
JM/PV
CC: Homer Pittman, Building Official
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Ken Merrill, City Accountant
Jim Schaefer, City Attorney
Greg Stevens, Dept. of Health
Dr. George Smith, City Health Official
Sam Ulland
Mr. & Mrs. Paul Scheurer
C�
•
•
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
August 20. 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland
and
Members of the Hutchinson City Council
Re: Abatement of Midwest Trailer Park
Dear Mayor Ackland and Council Members:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
On Wednesday, August 20. 1986 I discussed the status of
Midwest Trailer Park with Building Inspector Homer
Pittman. Work by Mr. Ulland's independently hired contractor
has begun and progress towards rectifying the sanitation
problems appears to be being made. Based upon this, it is my
recommendation that the municipality not at this time engage
the services of Juul Construction for repair of the private
sewer services at Midwest Trailer Park. I believe that this
option should be left open until such time as repairs have
been completed. If repairs are not made in a timely or
satisfactory manner the municipality may at that time order
repairs completed and assess the costs to Midwest Trailer
Park property taxes.
At the August 12, 1986 Council meeting I
to initiate prosecution of Mr. Ulland
untreated sewage onto the ground
Eleven (11) and Twelve (12). I
initiate a prosecution of Mr.
offense of operating a mobil home
Complaint -Summons for these offe
copy of this document is enclosed
Sincerely yours,
k4
Jame H.Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:nb
Enclosure
requested direction
for discharge of
at Lots Nine (9), Ten (10),
also sought authorization to
Ulland for the misdemeanor
park without a license. A
nsea have been drafted and a
for your files.
•
•
•
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
August 20, 1986
Mayor Paul Ackland
and
Members of the Hutchinson City Council
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Re: Klockman Property at 239 Fifth Avenue Southwest
Dear Mayor Ackland and Council Members:
I have on this date received a copy of the Order prepared on
August 18, 1986 directing Melvin Klockman and Jan Klockman to
repair or remove the structure located on the above described
property. At the conclusion of Fire Marshall Field's letter
he states, "If the problem is not corrected in the time stated
above, I will request the City Council's action to have the
house removed and certify the cost to your taxes."
Removal of hazardous and substandard buildings by a
municipality is governed by the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes 463.15 through 463.261. There are several options
available to the municipality. If the property owner consents
Minnesota Statutes 463.15 permits the municipality to remove
or raze any hazardous building or to remove or correct any
hazardous condition with the cost being charged against the
real estate and levied as a special assessment payable in a
single installment or, should the municipality so provide, the
cost assessed may be paid in, not to exceed five equal annual
installments with interest thereon at 8 percent per annum.
If the property owner does not consent to municipal repair or
removal or does not voluntarily remove or repair the building
the municipality may issue its order directing the owner to
correct the hazardous condition or remove the same. Minnesota
Statutes 463.17 provides that the order shall be in writing,
recite the grounds therefore, specify the necessary repairs,
if any, and provide a reasonable time for compliance. The
order shall also state that a motion for summary enforcement
of the order will be made to the District Court of the County
in which the hazardous building is situated unless corrective
Mayor Paul Ackland
and
Members of the Hutchinson City Council
Page 2
August 20, 1986
action is taken or unless an answer is filed within twenty
(20) days from the date of service on the owner. A copy of
the Order with proof of service on the owner shall be filed
with the Clerk of District Court of the County and a Notice of
Lis Pendence shall be filed with the County Recorder. If no
answer is made within the twenty (20) day time frame or if
repairs or removal have not been made within that time frame,
the municipality may move the District Court for judgment and
the District Court may thereafter authorize the governing body
to proceed with enforcement of the order. The costs of the
enforcement shall be ascertained and may be assessed to the
property owner as a special assessment.
This procedure was utilized by the municipality in 1984 when
property owned by the heirs of John McLaughlin was removed by
the municipality.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel
free to contact me directly.
Sincerely yours,
lCl
41
James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:nb
0
•
0
�tah aSur .tee i .:.:.wai�.:.n '19^B..;Aa
To The Editor.
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
As an interested citizen I beg to analyze the extravagant cost
too much government. Less than 5% of senior citizens ude the services of
government funded social services that are being pushed onto them by non-
elected gr -,ups for their own benefit and not becaude of need. Because of
local government profit people are allowed to fill up with liquor and race
do n the road that fills up our extravagant jail and is a big tax load.
In McLeod Co_nty there is great need for r=_pre-entation of majority
decision rule that in the past has been given by Dana L. Reed for County
Auditor. Russ Pettis should be given a chance to lower the expense and give
the people more information that the people deserve to know about the Sheriff
office. When dictatorship begins to smell like communism in America it is
time to be cleaning up. I would have been happy if our City ooverniient would
have been building a new City Hall instead of a police station that would
have provided for voting in a central location. Sincerely presented by
•
date AN 51986 wl
copy to Hutchinson City Council
0
RALPH COFFIN
416A 3RD AVE. S.W.
HUTCHINSON, MN 5M
/ru
REQ s tyft
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE
AT CITY HALL.
league of minnesota cities
Regional Meeting Agenda
Afternoon Session
2:30 - 4:30 pm
1. Status Report of LMC Legislative Committees
2. Update on Insurance Issues
a. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
b. Tort Liability Changes
3. Question/Answer Session
Table Talk Session
5:00 - 6:30 pm
. City officials will be able to visit with representatives
from the Department of Transportation, Department of Energy
and Economic Development, Department of Natural Resources,
Department of Health and the Pollution Control Agency.
10
Evening Program
6:30 - 9:30 pm
1. Dinner
2. Welcome by Host City
3. LMC President's Comments
4. City Policy Issues
5. Question/Answer Period
6. Brief Comments by Legislative Candidates
averL;e ea _. _t. pc:�ul, mir—esotl�i 5-E 1 O 1 [E 1 21 5800
0
till
league of rninneScta cit1eS
1986 Regional Meetings
ite
SMS_�
Date American Legion
Tues., August 26 Stephen
American Legion 11304
Wed., August 27 Gonvick
Thurs., August 28 Detroit Lakes Holiday Inn
Tues., Sept- 2
Wed., Sept. 3
Thurs., Sept. 4
Wed., Sept, 10
Thurs.# Sept. 11
Tues., Sept. 16
Wed., Sept. 17
Royal Supper Club
Slayton
Thurs., Sept. 18
Tues., Sept' 23
Thurs., Sept 25
Redwood Falls Donavon's Conference
Center
Eagle Lake American Legion
Morris
Spicer
Eyota
Medina
Virginia
Hinckley
Brainerd
Sunwood Inn
Safari South
American Legion
City Contac
Daryl Nelson
(218) 478-3614
Linda Johnson
(218) 487-5243
Lynn Neitk e
(218) 7-5658
Cathy Magnus
(507) 836-8534
Neil R637y5755 •
(507)
Joanne2 132181
(507)
Sandy Anderson
(612) 589-3141
Ardyce Hegstrom
(612) 796-5562
Geraldine Asleson
(507) 545-2135
Motel and Donna 473 4643
Medina (612)
Enterntainment Center
(Medina Ballroom)
Coates Plaza Hotel
Tobies
Cragun's Resort
Norma L. Nekich
(218) 741-3890
Jim Au3S4s6472
(612)
Dick Johnson •
(218) 829-2526
r,
St Gaul,
rnnnesota S 1 01 CG I -; 22- 7-5600
r�
0
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 Y✓ASHINGT0N AVENUE WEST
HL, TCHINSON. MINN. 55350
August 8, 1986
MEMORANDUM
: � e• �-. is � v «a.
FOR YOUR INF0RWICN
section 2 (see attached) of Resolution 6500 requires notice to the
city council on who is the designee(s) authorized to handle personnel
records.
In the past and by virtue of job descriptions provided over the
years, the designees in addition to myself are:
Hazel Sitz
Joleen Faze
This notice is only to oonfirm once again (per council resolution)
who is respcnsTble to handle personnel records.
CITY ATlcSC's OPU4IOTh
In response to Attorney James Schaefer's summary of the Data Practices
Act (page 4), 1 report the following:
1. The Council has designated the Responsible Authority, namely
the City Administrator (Resolution 6500, Marcia 25, 1980).
2. storage of personnel data is designated in the city vault.
3. To our knowledge all personnel records/data have been requested
to be turned over to the Personnel Coordinator.
4. Limited access has been established, per state statutes, by
limiting access to the responsible autfi itTy,aessgnees listed
above.
CITY ATMYNE.'Y'S R3CQ44a4WION
Pursuant to paragraph 1 on the City Attorney's memo of August 6, 1986,
I have requested the Personnel Coordinator to delineate the information in
the employee files by "category", as to meet any and all requirements of
the Data Practices Act.
RESOLUTION NO. 6500 1tF5Y0NSISLE AUTHORITY
TIVE ASS1STAltt AS CT1� ACT hotogra'
-SINISTRA t'ER'S1gT DATA 1'T�` icrop
PoiNTl,TSOTA Photograph•c, photostatic, r^
RZSOL13TIO+'� gv VVY `Ti.• tic ed records shall be Ci dlessr Of
-nt Data hic, o mtctotilm use reg
Govtrnm- 1611 is scccssibit for Convcnicnt
REAS, the tlinnesota� Sect. MI5 rds.
\,NE taStatu - • • that this city the size of these reco shaft es
Alinncso requires O uthority
Pra 15.1 Act, amended, rtgc onsiblc Authority 'F The Fespons+ble A ,c ucsts for
to 15.1698 as the RC-P for collection, b• insure that 4Complied
aPP°'nt one Person as ents roccdu es to
requirem of data on indivi• tzbiish P data are received xn
within [oPriau and Prompt ma^her.
to administer the data. 1 k government
and dissemiand+summRrY an aPP
sto[age, use w with in rit or deli net
ent
data, utho
V. at, governm v �onsible A ermrt t at
th+s e`ty' and, cou concerned with ��{ C. The Rts any person. data
Heil is on request Y govt:
It city data and vvishes to 4 shall, up ins ect and Copylbgouts of the city
\':HEREAS, of city Diming a^ ry erson t° Rhea business the RCsPuns*bit
the resp^^s.ble use immediately app
u�or[ty a no• that per
Resp°^s'bie `A duties andsst places pfO`ided bn requests,
Sal th's concern a ified oning
pct and ?_SS and -if the petro dais's mean`s'
xdministrativ ender the Authority, informed °f the designee sha
as required son shall be uthority or on t
to that Pet n; �iEp BY The Responsible A overnmtnt data upon
IT ies of 8 utfiority or design
REFORE, BE RESOD t
h1fNI; IESOTA ProvidtTttepRtsP°nsiblt f' per to 4aY
�p\V THE quest. a uesting P it
THE CITY COUNC{LIQ,.ex � r'.1 n and come
Autchineo nesota, shall requue thealriag,certifying utfiority
Council f actual cost of m Responsible P` Copies at
►fie city ° RCSQons+blt Authority the copies. if the rovide .
1. Adm• Ass..s the uirements01the able to P onsiblc A
aPP°ints Sof meeting ail req ct,llinnt designee is ^Ot made, the Resp
-
Copies as sot
ur ose est Data Practices b 15 1698, O time a request is
for the iGoverarr+ 1S 1611 for°t o or designee shall supplyesp°
MinnesotaSection use be ap v 1 of oss;bte. If the � u
sofa Statutes, pole: an individuatntduty to an fit reasonably P as to den
as amended. Vole.
designating ointed later ask,, Drily or designee . Classified
nes
that th
rather n is aPP classified s Cs onsiblc
pointed, government data is the R P
different PerSO this portion of tt+t � n access. inform the requ
office. 1f �sible Authorit d to indicate the namt requesting Pershallshall so a request,
the .Fespo amen 4 oto or des•8 ossible, an
ust be uthority.) ti erson
orally at the tirll r P
resolution m ble A ,nate q P on there.) orary Classificav
of the neve Resporw may desie writing as 5O itmp deter
;ble Authority may
to the ad- Cate the statute. which the
2 The ResP' loyeeS to ass
is, or emP est o{ the duties Of the federal law upon
a city employee and enforcem to be in charge of in made.
m+n�sonsible All horny an Con�inin8 governm for
ent The Respons+bit Authority v
Resp or systems with requesu d. est containi^g fi
comply ; le Authorit pare a public d° a d a descript+on of `-
dtvidundfitsreceive{fnL a Res ons, a omt address, gto!
data a this title and cess relatrno
Seco+d, file, or Pro individuals itt
go�•e•nmtnr data•^ee or lest Hees Count+ s allt
a des. t t cit of r dam on Collect
a ornu an des's- coniidenti�s used to
est must be to vvrttof thea ointmt^t rit +� ��
ons[ a utho y the city • nalr be included in
be ,ovided a CO the RCsP i[ements ,dentia) data s uthority st
nted, the
require con{ 7hc Responsible A ;and
are app°` • Hees in the Minnesota mens. ent an a
Hees des,g
sahu instruct � a and enforcing this �' ublic docum ntarn the
qct. ��Ote' the P cesI to ma
of adrn,nistern, Pracr.ces 1 Subd.2•i changes ne
(,oNe;nment Data 162 , cumene.
nder M.S.15 the do or ty
is permitted u Responsible Authority The Responsmle AU 11
C. assure th
11
the reg to
3. The duties l llovvs- lish procedu complete, and
neesarersio p l;eeQ r is aceu RLC, was c
and d '$ ��sponsiblt Autt dal' sha uch N. s which rt
an the pis+Poses for securh
The *a +n ropriau o:
z. - . vovefnmen ma^e them ablish .)PPG t o a
ds conta,;,,no o as to est
on ain,�o to
nditio
,�% f .,on°ement.andr Coconvenient use by the Pub- art records
f. The P.esp onsiblc Authority or designee
shall prepare Summary data from private or con-
fidcntial data on individuals upon the rr uest
of an rr n, provided that a request is in
writing g amend the cost of p:eparing the summary
data is borne by the requesting person. The Res-
ponsible Authority may delegate the power to
prepare summary data to the administrative
officer responsible for any central repository of
Summary data; or to a person outside of the
city if the person, in writing, sets forth his
purpose and agrees not to disclose, and the
Responsible Authorit-, reavnably drtermines
that the access will not compromise private or
confidential data on individuals.
g, The Responsible Authority shall pre-
pare a public document setting ort the rights
of the data subject pursuant to the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act and the specific
procedures in effect in the city for access by
the data subjects to public or private data on
individuals -
h. The Responsible Authority or designee
shall allow another Responsible Authority or
designee access to data classified as not public
only when the access is authorized or required
by statute or federal taw. The Responsible Auth-
ority or designee when supplying government
data under this provision may require the re-
questing Responsible Authority to pay the ac-
tual cost of supplying the data.
i. The Responsible Authority shall, when
appropriate, apply to the Commissioner of
4\ Administration for permission to classify tem-
porarily data or types of data on individuals
as private or confidential, or data not on in-
dividuals as non-public, on a temporary basis
until a proposed statute can be acted .upon
by the Legislature.
j. Upon reQuest to the Responsible
Authority, or designee, any individual must
be informed whether he is the subject of stored
�r data on individuals, and whether it is classified
as public, private or confidential_ Upon nf�rthher
E
rr ucst the individual who Is the'subject of
JT'0f'CTpliv8tC data on individuals shall be shown
the data without any charge to trim and, if he
desires, shall be informed of the content and
meaning of that data. The Responsible Autho-
rity or designee shall provide copies of the pri.
vate data upon request by the individual subject
of the data, and the cost of providing copies
shall be borne by the individual. The Responsi.
ble Authority o: designee shall comply imme-
diately, if possible, with any request made by
an individual under this paragraph, or within five
days of the date of the request, excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and (coal holidays, if im-
mediate compliance is not possible. If the Res-
ponsible Authority or designee cannot comply
with the request within that time, he shall so
inform the individual, and may have an addition-
al five days within which to comply with the
request, excluding Saturdays, Sunday and legal
holidays.
k. If an individual contests th ar racy
vor com eteness of publi of Drivatecon
�X c–e–r—ning–ti-imself, and notifies in writing
Res onsible Authorrt aescn mg a m_turete
ho
to reemen , e Responsible Authorit-
shall within thirty days either correct the dat
found to be inaccurate or incomplete an,
attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurat
or incomplete data, including recipients name.
by the individual; or notify the individual tha
the Responsible Authority believes the data t.
be correct. Data which is in dispute shall be di
closed only if the individual's statement of di:
agreement is included with the disclosed dat.
4. This resolution implementing the Minneso-
Government Data Practices Act shall remain
force and effect until modified by the city count
Adopted by the council of the city of Autch
this 25thday tl2r_ chi 19 80 /
Mayor
de
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
August 6, 1986
zoo,
Mayor Paul Ackland
HUTCHINSON CITY HALL
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: PERSONNEL DATA STORAGE
Dear Mayor Ackland:
Under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, commonly called
the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, all data
collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by
any state agency or political subdivision must be made
accessible to the public unless the data is classified as
non -accessible. In order to determine what data is accessible
six general categories of data have been created by that act.
Data on individuals is broken down into Public Data, Private
Data, and Confidential Data. Data not on individuals is
broken down into Public Data. N6R-publlc vatal o ected
Non-PyJa�tAll data maintained by the municipality must
in
separate rules
accessibility.
dissemination and
The act places the duties of implementing
dissemination and collection procedures and the maintenance of
government data upon the city's "responsible authority% As
defined in MS 13.02 Subd. 16 the "responsible authority in any
political subdivision means the individual designated by the
governing body of that political subdivision and the
individual responsible for the collection, use, and
dissemination of any set of data on individuals, government
data, or summary data, unless otherwise provided by state
law." Since the City Council for the City of Hutchinson is
the governing body of tta municipality, it has the authority
to appoint a "responsible authority" whose duties it shall be
•
LL -
W�rtrc..l1 2fj r54o •
Rcsolk��i�.l Gam'
0
Mayor Paul Ackland
`. August 6, 1986
Page Two
to implement the requirements of the Government Data Practices
Act.
Section 13.03 Subd. 1 requires the responsible
authority to 'keep records containing government data in such
an arrangement and condition and to make them easily
accessible for convenient use.' Section 13.05 Subd. 5
requires the responsible authority to •establish procedures to
assure that all data on individuals is accurate, completer and
current for the purposes for which it was collected' and
"establish appropriate security safe guards for all records
containing data on individuals.• In establishing these
procedures Section 13.03 Subd. 2 provides, •A res onsible
authorit may designate one or more desi nees.• It is assume
t at sur esignees may assista reaponsi le authority in
the implementation of this program on a day-to-day basis.
Section 13.43 of the Government Data Practices Act
specifically deals with Personnel Data. Subdivision 1 of that
• Section defines personnel data as 'data on individuals
collected because the individual is or was an employee of or
an applicant for employment by, performed services on a
voluntary basis, or acts as an independent contractor with a
State agency, state-wide system or political subdivision or is
a member of an advisory board or commission.• This definition
clearly is broad enough to encompass all materials which a
municipality may store in its standard personnel files.
Subdivision 2 of that section lists various items of personnel
data which is public, that is, which may be made available to
any member of the public upon proper request. Subdivision 4
provides that all other personnel data is private data on
individuals.
It is clear that personnel data is subject to the
requirements and regulations of the Government Data Practices
Act and therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the
individual appointed as responsible authority by the City
Council. All personnel records would come under the
jurisdiction of the responsible authority and it would be his
duty to insure that access to the public for public
information was easily accessible for convenient use while
assuring that all non-public data is protected from
unauthorized dissemination by appro?riate security safeguards.
When dealing with personnel
data
of
any
employee,
it
must be remembered that all private
data
on
that
employee
is
Mayor Paul Ackland
August 6, 1986
Page Three
C JvN � accessible
those otl
reas�r_
those whose work assignment reasonaoiy requires access to the
data is imposed by the rules promulgated by Commissioner of
the Department of Administration, 1205.0400 Subd. 2. This
requires the responsible authority to make a determination as
to those individuals whose work assignments reasonably require
access to private data on an individual that may be stored in
that individuals personnel file and to limit access to such
personnel file to only those individuals.
A question has been raised concerning the storage and
maintenance of police department personnel records. Several
characteristics unique to police department personnel is
police employee's special cause for concern. First, in order
to obtain their license as police officers all officers must
take part in psychological testing. The results and
interpretation of those psychological tests become part o e
munici a
ure acc
subiect of
ovees
s r
F
1c em to ee's eraonnel Llle. .Oucn p�yvnvivyia:aa �oa�saay
s no require o any o er municipal employee. Since the
results of those testa may be subject to various
interpretations, unauthorized dissemination poses a threat to
police officers not generally faced by other municipal
employees.
Second, because of the nature of police employment
complaints against police officers filed by citizens, other
officers, superiors or employers may subject the officer to
individual liability as a result of his actions. Although
other employees may face individual liability, such an action
would be extremely rare while an action seeking personnel
liability on a police officer's part is quite common. Thus,
any investigation conducted internally by the police
department is extremely sensitive. It is generally held that
while an internal investigation is going on, documents and
data gathered need not be placed in the employee's personnel
file. When an invest i ation has been completed, all such data
should a ace in the on
employee s personnel tile. Unly e
71—na-l=lsposition of any a1sciplinary action anT supporting
documentation becomes puulic and all other internal affairs
investigation data remaining private. Again, since this
0
•
Ll
• Mayor Paul Ackland
August 61 1986
Page Four
information is extremely sensitive, individual police officers
have a legitimate interest in maintaining security on their
personnel file that may exceed the interest any other
municipal employee may have in the protection of unauthorized
dissemination of private data.
To summarize, it is my opinion that the municipality
may:
1) Designate its responsible authorit and his designees as
the agents w o aTia1T ave res Alb ility for gatherings
storing and disseminating all personnel data;
2) Designate one or more particular locations for the storage
of all personnel data;
3) Require all personnel data with the exception of on-going
internal affairs investigations be placed in an employee's
• personnel data file;
4) Limit access to em 10
E!onnel files to those whose
work assignment or autresreaso—nably require access or to
the subject of the files. 70�Ne�+t►��vy
If there is any question concerning) accessibility to
the file or the adequacy of the existing security safeguards,
I would suggest that the municipality discuss this matter
directly with its current responsible authority. It may be
advisable for the municipality to discuss or review its
procedures in relation to the gathering, storing and
disseminating of personnel data with either the League of
Minnesota Cities or the Data Privacy Division of the State
Department of Administration. Either of these organizations
could make a determination as to the adequacy of our current
security safeguards and procedures and perhaps offer
suggestions as to improvements.
Sincerely yours,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/ l�, )
• James H. Schaefer
Hutchinson City Attorney
JHS:dlp
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
#VASNINGTON AVENUE 'vv'ES7
1NSON„MI.NN 5530
August 25, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: POLICE CIVIL SERVICE CCWISSION
Jeff Haag - William Miskoff - Robert Prochnow
•.•0 0 1 U grFRA-8751•Mt , n
Please be advised that I am calling a meeting of the Hutchinson
Police Civil Service Cawdssion for Thursday, August 28, at
7 p.m. in the City Council chaffbers at City Hall.
This will be a discussion of the duties and responsibilities
of the Police Civil Service Commission.
copy: Dean O'Borsky
Nancy Buss
0
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Re: $1,720,000 Industrial Development Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Hutchinson Telephone Company Project),
Series 1986, City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
• Dear Mr. Plotz:
Enclosed are ten copies each of the minutes of public
hearing to be held by the City Council at its meeting of
September 28, 1986, with respect to the above Bonds, and the
resolution giving final approval to the issuance of the Bonds to
be considered by the Council at such meeting after holding the
hearing.
Also enclosed for presentation to the Council prior to
consideration of such resolution are copies of the latest drafts
of the following:
(1) Loan Agreement
(2) Indenture of Trust
(3) Bond Purchase Agreement
(4) Preliminary Official Statement
Very truly yours,
Michael Reeslund
MER/lmm
Enclosures
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership InCfudin9 Professional Corp"Fions
,
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
M5 MINNESOTA STREET
(612) 340-2600
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELE( 28-0605
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(612)22]-8017
TELECOPIER:(612)340-2068
(408)72'1-3632
P. O. BOK 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
304 TRANSWEBTERN PLAZA 111
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
550 NORTH 31^ STREET
(5071288-3156
P. O. BOX 1179
BANK BUILDING
315 WAYZATA, MINNESOTA
MICHAEL E. REESLUND
BILU NGS, MONTANA 59103
55391NATIONAL
(406)252-3800
(612) 475 -0373
(612) 340 -2960
350 PARK AVENUE
30 RUE LA BOETIE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
August 27, 1986
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
(212)415-9200
011 331 502 32 50
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Re: $1,720,000 Industrial Development Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Hutchinson Telephone Company Project),
Series 1986, City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
• Dear Mr. Plotz:
Enclosed are ten copies each of the minutes of public
hearing to be held by the City Council at its meeting of
September 28, 1986, with respect to the above Bonds, and the
resolution giving final approval to the issuance of the Bonds to
be considered by the Council at such meeting after holding the
hearing.
Also enclosed for presentation to the Council prior to
consideration of such resolution are copies of the latest drafts
of the following:
(1) Loan Agreement
(2) Indenture of Trust
(3) Bond Purchase Agreement
(4) Preliminary Official Statement
Very truly yours,
Michael Reeslund
MER/lmm
Enclosures
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 1986
PUBLICATION NO. 3606
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROJECT AND THE ISSUANCE
• OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS UNDER THE
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, MINNESOTA
STATUTES, SECTIONS 474.01 TO 474.13, AS AMENDED, ON
BEHALF OF THE HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet on August 28, 1986,
at 7:00 P.M. at the City Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West, in
the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting
a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue revenue bonds
(the Series 1986 Bonds), in one or more series, under the
Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 474.01 to 474.13, as amended (the Act), in order to
refund prior to maturity a series of revenue bonds previously
issued by the City under the Act in the aggregate principal
amount of $2,300,000, the proceeds of which were loaned to the
Hutchinson Telephone Company, a Minnesota corporation (the
Company), to finance a portion of the cost of a project (the
Project). The Project consisted of the acquisition and
installation by the Company of new electronic switching equipment
in the central office of the Company located at 30 Second Avenue
Southwest in the City and additional feeder cables and buried
• cable facilities in and in the vicinity of the City, all owned
and used by the Company in its business of providing telephone
service to the City and certain surrounding areas. The total
amount of the proposed Series 1986 Bond issue will not exceed
$2,155,000. The Series 1986 Bonds shall be limited obligations
of the City and shall be payable solely from the revenue pledged
to the payment thereof, except that such Series 1986 Bonds may
be secured by a mortgage or other encumbrance on the Project.
No holder of any such Series 1986 Bond shall ever have the right
to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay
the Series 1986 Bonds, or the interest thereon, nor to enforce
payment thereon against any property of the City except the
Project should it become the property of the City.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at
the time and place set forth above, or may file written comments
with the City Administrator prior to the date of the hearing
set forth above.
Dated: August 12, 1986.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
By Gary D. Plotz
• City Administrator
11
is
HCDC Board of Director's Meeting
August 25, 1986 - 7:00 a.m.
Chamber Office
Members Present:
Ron McGraw, Chairman
Art Cooper
Buzz Burich
Don Glas
Glenn Matejka
The meeting was called to order by Chairman McGraw.
N^'
Others Present:
John Bernhagen, Exec. Director
Walt Clay, Hutchinson Telephone Co
A presentation was given by Walt Clay explaining Industrial Revenue Bonds
issued to refund a prior bond may become arbitrage bonds pursuant to Section 103(C)
of the Industrial Revenue Code if a fee is charged by the City in excess of
certain income guidelines. After further discussion, the following motion was
acted upon and will be an advisory to the City Council.
Matejka moved, seconded by Glas, to rescind the action taken on August 18,
1986, regarding fees on Industrial Revenue Bonds to refund a prior bond,
and for the Hutchinson Telephone Company, the $1,000 initial fee be waived
and there shall be a fee of 1/16 of one percent per annum on the remaining
principle balance.
Motion carried. McGraw abstained.
Board members were asked to make their intentions known to attend the Star
City Annual Conference.
There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 8:15 a.m.
n
LJ
0
510 MOWN CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
M5 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227- 6017
P. O. BOX B48
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILOINO
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(5w ) zee -315e
315 FIRST NAMNAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA,MINNESOTA 55391
(612) 475 -0373
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415-9200
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Peronho Including P.oksSionH Capwallons
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340-2600
TELEX 29-0605
TELEOOPIER+(&2)340-2866
Mr. Ronald J. McGraw
Citizens Bank Building
102 Main Street South
P.O. Box 98
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Ron:
MICHAEL E.REESLUND
(612) 340-2960
August 21, 1986
201 DAmscm 6UIL01N0
e THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 54101
(106)727-3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA N
550 NORTH 31" STREET
P. O. BOK 190
6ILUNOS, MONTANA 69103
(406)252-3800
30 RUE U BOERE
75006 PARIS, FRANCE
Oil 331 562 32 50
Re: $2,155,000 Industrial Development Refunding Revenue
Bonds (Hutchinson Telephone Company Project),
Series 1986, City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
We have been advised that the City of Hutchinson, in
connection with the issuance of the above Bonds, is considering
charging the Hutchinson Telephone Company an up -front fee of $1,000
on or before August 28, 1986, plus an annual fee of 1/88 per year
on the outstanding principal balance of the Bonds. In making any
final determination in this regard, the City should be aware that
payment of a portion or all of such fees could cause interest on
the Bonds to be subject to federal income taxation.
Section 103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended, together with Treasury Regulations thereunder, places
restrictions on, among other things, certain payments to be made
to issuers of municipal bonds as a condition to the tax exempt status
of interest thereon. The City is permitted under Section 103(c)
and applicable Treasury Regulations to receive reimbursement from
the Company for the City's actual expenses in issuing the Bonds
and performing its ongoing obligations with respect to the Bonds.
However, any additional amounts to be paid by the Company to the
City with respect to the Bonds would be limited under Section 103(c)
and such regulations to amounts which would not cause the yield
on all payments made by the Company to the City with respect to
the Bonds to exceed by more than 1/88 the yield on that portion
DORSEY a WHITNEY
Mr. Ronald J. McGraw
August 21,.1986
Page Two
of such payments which are to be used to pay debt service on the
Bonds. In other words, in connection with the Bonds, the Company
cannot pay to the City amounts (other than those necessary to
reimburse the City for its actual expenses relating to the Bonds)
in excess of 1/8% per year on the outstanding principal balance
of the Bonds (or, if paid in a lump sum, in an amount which would
yield, on a present value basis, more than 1/8% on the Bonds as
computed over the life of the Bonds) without adversely affecting
the tax exempt status of interest on the Bonds.
Therefore, if the Company is to pay the City the proposed
annual 1/8% fee, (1) such fee must be payable in arrears and no
earlier than the principal payment date in each year (due to present
value considerations), and (2) no portion of the $1,000 up -front
fee or any other amount can be paid by the Company to the City except
in reimbursement for the City's actual costs in issuing and
administering to the Bonds.
If you have any questions about any of the foregoing,
please call me at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
14,t�4
Michael E. Reeslund
MER/lmm
cc: Mr. Walter S. Clay
Mr. Edward W. Brownell, III
Mr. Joseph C. Gonnella
•
0
CERTIFICATE OF MINUTES RELATING TO
Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds
(Hutchinson Telephone Company Project)
Issuer: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A special meeting held
on August 28, 1986, at the City Hall in Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING
and
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND
SALE BY THE CITY OF $1,720,000 AGGREGATE
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
(HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY PROJECT),
• SERIES 1986, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
INDENTURE OF TRUST, A LOAN AGREEMENT AND A
BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, ALL RELATING TO
SAID BONDS, AND AUTHORIZING OTHER ACTION TO
BE TAKEN WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE, SALE
AND DELIVERY OF SAID BONDS
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of , 1986.
• Signature
Gary D Plotz City Administrator
Name and Title
(SEAL)
The Mayor stated that this was the time and place for
a public hearing on the proposal that the City issue its
revenue bonds (the Bonds) under Minnesota Statutes, Sections
474.01 to 474.13, as amended (the Act), to refund a series of
revenue bonds previously issued by the City under the Act (the
Refunded Bonds), the proceeds of which were used to finance a
project (the Project) on behalf of the Hutchinson Telephone
Company, a Minnesota corporation. The City Administrator
presented an affidavit showing publication of the notice of
public hearing at least once not less than 14 days prior to the
date fixed for the public hearing, in the Hutchinson Leader,
the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general
circulation in the City. The affidavit was examined, found to
• be satisfactory and ordered placed on file with the City
Administrator.
The Mayor then opened the meeting for the public
hearing on the Project and the proposal to issue the Bonds to
refund the Refunded Bonds. The purpose of the hearing was
explained, the nature of the Project and of the proposed Bonds
was discussed, and all persons present who desired to do so
were afforded an opportunity to express their views with
respect to the Project and the proposal to issue the Bonds to
refund the Refunded Bonds, in response to which the following
persons either appeared, were recognized and made statements,
or filed written comments with the City Administrator before
•
• the date set for the hearing, summaries of which appear
opposite their respective names:
Name of Speaker Summary of Views
After all persons who wished to do so had stated or
filed their views on the proposal, the Mayor declared the
• public hearing to be closed.
•
-2-
• Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND
SALE BY THE CITY OF $1,720,000 AGGRE-
GATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
(HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY PROJECT),
SERIES 1986, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN INDENTURE OF TRUST, A LOAN AGREEMENT
AND A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, ALL
RELATING TO SAID BONDS, AND AUTHORIZING
OTHER ACTION TO BE TAKEN WITH RESPECT
TO THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF
SAID BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of
the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
1. It has been proposed that the City issue its
Industrial Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (Hutchinson
Telephone Company Project), Series 1986 (the "Bonds"), in the
• aggregate principal amount of $1,720,000, and loan the proceeds
thereof to the Hutchinson Telephone Company, a Minnesota
corporation (the "Company"), which will use the proceeds to
refund the City's $2,300,000 Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds (Hutchinson Telephone Company Project), Series 1981,
$2,155,000 in principal amount of which are currently
outstanding (the "Refunding"), the proceeds of which were
loaned to the Company to finance a portion of the cost of the
acquisition and installation of new electronic switching
equipment in the central office of the Company located at 30
Second Avenue Southwest in the City and additional feeder
cables and buried cable facilities in the City and elsewhere in
the Counties of McLeod, Meeker and Renville (the "Project").
The Council, pursuant to Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1954, as amended, held a public hearing on this date
and prior to consideration of this Resolution on the Project
and the proposed issuance of the Bonds to accomplish the
Refunding. Drafts of the following documents relating to the
issuance of the Bonds have been submitted to the Council and
are now, or shall be placed, on file in the office of the City
Administrator:
(a) Loan Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1986
(the "Loan Agreement"), proposed to be made and entered into
between the City and the Company;
•
-3-
• (b) Indenture of Trust, dated as of September 1, 1986
(the "Indenture"), proposed to be made and entered into between
the City and First Trust Company, Inc., as trustee (the
"Trustee");
(c) Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase
Agreement"), proposed to be made and entered into among the
City, the Company and Juran & Moody, Inc. (the "Underwriters");
and
(d) Preliminary Official Statement, dated August 25,
1986 (the "Preliminary official Statement"), relating to the
Bonds.
2. It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) the purpose of the Refunding is to promote and
retain existing economically sound industry and commerce for
the purpose of preventing, so far as possible, the emergence of
blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment
and the movement of talented, educated personnel of mature age
to other areas, and to permit the Company to deliver telephone
service to residents of the City and surrounding areas at a
reduced cost;
• (b) the Refunding, the issuance and sale of the
Bonds, the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement, the
Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement and the performance
of all covenants and agreements of the City contained in the
Loan Agreement, the Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement
and of all other acts and things required under the
Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the
Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreement and
the Bonds valid and binding obligations of the City in
accordance with their terms are authorized by Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 474.01 to 474.13, as amended (collectively,
the "Act");
(c) it is desirable that the Bonds in the amount of
$1,720,000 be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in
the Indenture, under the provisions of which a pledge of and
security interest in the City's interest in the Loan Agreement
and the payments thereunder (except for certain expenses and
indemnification) will be granted to the Trustee as security for
the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on
the Bonds;
(d) the loan payments contained in the Loan Agreement
are fixed, and required to be revised from time to time as
necessary, so as to produce income and revenue sufficient to
• provide for prompt payment of principal of, premium, if any,
and interest on all bonds issued under the Indenture (including
the Bonds) when due, and the Loan Agreement also provides that
the Company is required to pay all expenses of the operation
and maintenance of the Project, including, but without
limitation, adequate insurance thereon and all taxes and
special assessments levied upon or with respect to the site of
the Project and payable during the term of the Loan Agreement;
and
(e) under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 474.10, and as provided in the Loan Agreement and
Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged
upon any funds of the City other than the revenue pledged to
the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability
thereon; no holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to
compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay any
of the Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment
thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not
constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable,
upon any property of the City; and each Bond issued under the
Indenture shall recite that the Bonds, including interest
thereon, are payable solely from the revenue pledged to the
payment thereof and that no Bond shall constitute a debt of the
City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation.
• 3. The forms of Loan Agreement, Indenture, Bond
Purchase Agreement and Preliminary Official Statement referred
to in paragraph 1 are approved. The Loan Agreement and
Indenture, with such variations, insertions and additions as
the City Attorney may hereafter deem appropriate, are directed
to be executed in the name and on behalf of the City by the
Mayor and the official seal of the City impressed thereon and
attested to by the City Clerk. The Official Statement (the
"Official Statement"), in substantially the form of the
Preliminary official Statement, with such variations,
insertions and additions as the City Attorney may hereafter
deem appropriate, is approved. The Council ratifies, confirms
and approves the circulation of the Preliminary Official
Statement, and authorizes the distribution of the Official
Statement, by the Underwriters to dealers and prospective
purchasers of the Bonds. Copies of all of the documents shall
be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The
terms and conditions of the Bond Purchase Agreement are found
to be reasonable and advantageous to the City, and the Mayor
and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the Bond
Purchase Agreement in the name and on behalf of the City.
•
4. In anticipation of the collection of payments
under the Loan Agreement, the City shall proceed forthwith to
-5-
• issue the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of
$1,720,000, in the form and upon the terms set forth in the
Indenture, which terms are for this purpose incorporated in
this resolution and made a part hereof. The proposal of the
Underwriters to purchase the Bonds upon the terms and
conditions set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement is hereby
found and determined to be reasonable and is hereby accepted.
The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to prepare
and execute by facsimile signature the Bonds as prescribed in
the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee; together with
a certified copy of this resolution and other documents
required by the Indenture, for authentication and delivery to
the purchaser. The Trustee is hereby appointed authenticating
agent with respect to the Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 475.55, and the certificate of authentication on the
Bonds shall evidence authentication of the Bonds under this
authority.
5. The Mayor, City Administrator, City Clerk and other
officers of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and
furnish to the purchaser of the Bonds, when issued, certified
copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to
the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be
required to show the facts relating to the legality and
• marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books
and records in the officers' custody and control or as
otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies,
certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore
furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to
the truth of all statements contained therein.
6. The approval hereby given to the various documents
referred to above includes an approval of such additional
details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such
modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions
thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and approved by the
City Attorney prior to the execution of the documents. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or
officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive
evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with
the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or City Clerk,
any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be
executed may be executed by the Acting Mayor or Deputy City
Clerk, respectively.
7. This resolution shall be effective immediately
upon its final adoption.
•
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, this 28th day of August, 1986.
Attest:
City Administrator
(SEAL)
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member and the
following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
and was presented to the Mayor, who approved and signed the
same, which was attested by the City Administrator,
-7-