Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp12-09-86 cHUTCH INSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
December 7* T 0 December 13
1936
WEDNESDAY
-1.0-
10:00 A.M. - Directors
Meeting at
City Hall
SUNDAY low MONDAY TUE'S
-7- /!7� _ -8- -9-
THURSDAY
-11-
"A CHRISTIMAS
h� PARTS!"
FRIDAY
-12-
O F F I C E P A R T Y --
Victorian Inn
7:00 P.M. - Social Hour
7:45 P.M. - Buffet Style Diane
9:00 P.M. - Music by "Clover"
Prizes and Surprise Guest -
COME AND JOIN THE FUN!
Y
7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at
City Hall
SATURDAY
-13-
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1986
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. E. David Natwick, Christ The King Lutheran Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Special Meeting of November 20, 1986
and Regular Meeting November 25, 1986
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Building Official's Report - November 1986
(b) Snow Removal Permits:
1. Ed Karg
2. Marty Barnes
• 3. Ron Hansen
4. Rod Krasen
5. Joe Schulz
6. Kerry Krueger
7. Milt Hanson
8. Lyle Larson
9. Ed Rettman Jr.
10. Larry McDonald
11. Bruce Rahn
12. Carl Christensen
13. Darrold Ziegler - Juul Contracting
14. Dale Sturges
(c) Retail "On Sale" Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for
D'Yinci's of Hutchinson
Action - Motion to order minutes and report filed and issue permits/
license
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
(a) Assessment Roll No. 223 - Improvement Project No. 86-14
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to adopt
assessment roll - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
• 6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
None
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 9, 1986
•
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(b) Ordinance No. 27/86 - An Ordinance Amending Section 1025 Of The 1974
Ordinance Code Of The City Of Hutchinson Entitled: Nuisances Prohibited
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(b) Ordinance No. 28/86 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 464
Concerning Zoning Regulations In The City Of Hutchinson And The
Official Zoning Map
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt
(c) Resolution No. 8432 - Transferring $276,465 From 1980 Tax Increment
Debt Service Fund To 1984 Parking Improvement Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
(d) Resolution No. 8433 - Resolution Concurring In The Action Of The
Hutchinson Utilities Commission Of The City Of Hutchinson In Accepting
Bid On Sale And Providing For The Issuance Of $3,920,000 Electric
Utility Revenue Bonds Of 1986
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt •
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Policy For Reconstruction Of City Streets
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 25, 1986)
Action -
(b) Consideration Of 1987 Improvement Projects (DEFERRED NOV. 25, 1986)
Action -
(c) Consideration of Establishing Bid Date For Demolition/Removal Of House
At 115 Franklin North
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve opening bids December 15,
1986 at 2:00 P.M.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) Consideration of Authorization To Proceed With Bidding Process for
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve •
2
L�
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - DECEMBER 9, 1986
(b) Consideration of Fire Department Selling Four Pagers And Purchasing
Two New Pagers
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) Consideration of Request for Building Fund for Senior Citizens
Action -
(d) Consideration of Notice of Order to Repair or Remove Structure Located
at 239 Fifth Avenue Southwest
Action- Motion to reject - Motion to authorize signing order
(e) Consideration of Extending Police Patrolman's Longevity Pay Plan
Action -
(f) Consideration of Recommendation for Annual Wage Adjustment
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve recommendation
10. Miscellaneous
• (a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
•
3
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1986
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Paul Ackland called the meeting to order. Members present in
addition to Mayor Ackland were Aldermen Mike Carls, John Mlinar, Marlin
Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky. Also present were City Administrator Gary
Plotz and Finance Director Ren Merrill.
2. WATER SUPPLY TO GOPHER CAMPFIRE SANCTUARY (Deferred October 28, 1986)
Dr. Virgil Voigt and other representatives of Gopher Campfire Club were
present and spoke concerning a well that would supplement the current
hydrant water supply which provides treated water to the wildlife
sanctuary. Hydrant is presently controlled to a flow of 50 gal/min. A 6 -
inch well, 240' deep with 3 HP pump could provide about 200 gal/min and
would cost an estimated $6,000 to install. Last year water was pumped
for 107 days from November through March with usage of 7,704,000 gallons.
With proper maintenance, a well should last for 25 years.
After further discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that the
addition of a well would be a much more economical way to supply water to
the sanctuary in the long run. The Council asked if Gopher Campfire
would be willing to donate some portion of the cost. The club will
discuss the request and inform the Council.
is 3. ENTERPRISE FUNDS BUDGET
a) Liquor Store
b) Sewer & Water Fund
c) Central Garage
Finance Director Ken Merrill presented the budgets with assistance from
Chuck Nelson (Liquor Store), Ralph Neumann and Doug Meier (Central
Garage). Budgets will be placed on agenda for adoption at next regular
City Council meeting, as presented, except for Central Garage which will
have deletion of two vehicles.
After discussion of water department budget, Finance Director Merrill was
asked to prepare a recommendation for future water rate adjustments.
4. LIQUOR STORE SATELLITE SITE
Finance Director Merrill and Liquor Store Manager Nelson discussed a
study which suggests that a satellite store at the Hutch Mall would not
be economically feasible. Remodeling the present store would be a
difficult project due to its shape. An option would be to move the
store to Plaza 15. After discussion, it was the consensus of the Council
that we should continue to examine the possibility of remodeling the
present store. It was recommended by the Council to Liquor Store Manager
• Nelson that he run weekly specials to enhance the image of the store as
competitively priced, and that this should be done even if it means
lowering the profit over an extended period of time.
1,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 20, 1986
L�
5. AIRPORT APPRAISALS
City Administrator Plotz reviewed the airport appraisals which have been
received from MN/DOT. He called two supervisors at MN/DOT to request a
review of the conclusions and was told the only chance for review would
be by a private appraiser whom the city would employ. After the private
appraisal, MN/DOT would review both reports and determine if an
adjustment should be made from their original appraisal.
Mayor Ackland questioned the accuracy of the "commercial" value placed on
portions of the properties, which he believes was based on incorrect
information used by the appraiser about another commercial property sale
price. City Administrator Plotz was instructed to contact MN/DOT with
correct information about the commercial value used (ear wash property)
and to again request an appraisal change. If no change can be made, it
is the preference of the Council to take no action now.
The Council discussed options if zoning is not carried out as planned.
Airport improvements (the 8001 runway extension) may be stopped, with
only maintenance payments being received from the State in the future.
Property owners could take action to have the city rescind the zoning or
pay them for the value of their property (Zone A - fee title, Zone B -
easement).
6. ASSESSMENT POLICY FOR LARSON STREET AND FIFTH AVENUE PROJECTS •
The council requested that staff provide alternatives and options for
cost sharing of the projects based on information from the League of
Minnesota Cities and the City of Litchfield, which developed a formula
for projects there. The City Administrator was directed to obtain
information on the number of accidents at the Highway 15 South semaphor
since its installation.
7. REVISION OF CITY POLICIES FOR POLICY BOOR
The drafted policies will be reviewed for discussion at the next regular
council meeting.
8. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Ackland adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
0
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
• TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1986
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Alderman Mike Carl s, Alderman John Mlinar, Alderman Mar-
lin Torgerson, Alderman Pat Mikulecky, and Mayor Paul L. Ackland. Also
present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and City Attorney James Schaefer.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Father Peter Zafe.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of November 10, 1986 were approved as
distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - OCTOBER 1986
2. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES - NOVEMBER 5, 1986
3. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - OCTOBER 21, 1986
• 4. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES - OCTOBER 23, 1986
5. HOSPITAL BOARD MINUTES - OCTOBER 21, 1986
(b) CHRISTMAS TREE SALES PERMIT:
1. CYNTHIA J. BEADELL
2. LEONARD RIEMANN
3. CHARLES PULKRABEK
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to order the minutes and report filed and to issue the permits. Motion
unanimously carried.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE TO DONALD ERICKSON
Mayor Ackland presented Donald Erickson with a plaque of appreciation
for his years of service on the Planning Commission.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
• (a) RESOLUTION NO. 8421 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE AND SUBSTITUTION
OF SECURITIES TO FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8421. Motion unanimously
carried.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 27/86 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1025 OF THE 1974
ORDINANCE CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED: NUISANCES PROHIBITED
Alderman Torgerson moved to waive first reading of Ordinance No. 27/86
and set the second reading for December 9, 1986. Motion seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 8422 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Torger-
son, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8422 for purchase of
diesel fuel. Motion unanimously carried.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 8427 - TRANSFERRING $560,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO
HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION CONSTRUCTION FUND
Alderman Torgerson moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No.
8427. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS •
(a) CONSIDERATION OF HIGHWAY 15 SOUTH IMPROVEMENT - PROJECT NO. 87-06
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 10, 1986)
Two MN/DOT representatives were present to review the proposed layout
plan for Highway 15 South. Discussion was given to including a left-
hand turn on Echo Drive. Also, the proposed sidewalk commencing at the
corner of South Grade Road and extending to the Hutchinson Mall was
discussed. A question was raised about funding to pay for the project,
and the Council stated no decision had been made.
Following extensive discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar
to approve project No. 87-06 contingent upon the inclusion of a left-
hand turn on Echo Drive and moving the parking lot as far as possible
to the north on the end of Main Street. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and carried unanimously.
Alderman Mlinar moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8430
with the stipulations. Alderman Torgerson seconded the motion and
unanimously carried.
(b) DISCUSSION OF MAPLEWOOD ACADEMY LATERAL 1/COUNTY DITCH 18/COUNTY BOARD
(DEFERRED OCTOBER 14, 1986)
City Attorney Schaefer presented an update report. Following discus- •
sion, Alderman Torgerson moved to authorize the City Attorney to con-
tact Maplewood Academy's legal counsel and find out specific details of
PAI
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
their assumption that the City of Hutchinson should be responsible for
their drainage. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously
carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF CITY STREETS
(DEFERRED NOVEMBER 10, 1986)
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to defer to the December 9,
Alderman Carls moved to approve and enter into an agreement with Pitney
Bowes. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING BID DATE FOR ADVERTISEMENT OF NEW TRANSIT
BUS (HUTCHMOBILE)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and set the bid date for January 20, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF 1987 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Alderman Carls made the motion to defer.
is Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF RECONVEYANCE OF LAND
3
Motion seconded by Alderman
1986 Council meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and car-
ried unanimously.
(d)
CONSIDERATION OF CITY AUDIT COST COMPARISON (DEFERRED NOV. 10, 1986)
After discussion, it was the consensus of the Council that the City
consider audit proposals for 1987. It was suggested that the City
prepare written specifications of what should be done by an auditor.
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the present auditor, Charles Bailly &
Company, for 1986. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson. The motion
was made by Alderman Mikulecky to amend the motion to set the fee at
$14,000. Motion failed for lack of a second. The main motion carried
three to two, with Aldermen Mlinar and Torgerson and Mayor Ackland vot-
ing aye and Aldermen Carls and Mikulecky voting nay.
9. NEW
BUSINESS
(a)
CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls to discontinue service unless
special arrangements had been made as stated in the memo. Alderman
Mikulecky seconded the motion and unanimously carried.
(b)
CONSIDERATION OF EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH PITNEY BOWES FOR
ELECTRONIC SCALE
Alderman Carls moved to approve and enter into an agreement with Pitney
Bowes. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING BID DATE FOR ADVERTISEMENT OF NEW TRANSIT
BUS (HUTCHMOBILE)
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and set the bid date for January 20, 1987. Motion carried
unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF 1987 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Alderman Carls made the motion to defer.
is Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF RECONVEYANCE OF LAND
3
Motion seconded by Alderman
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
Following discussion of the City obtaining the right-of-way adjacent to
the water plant site on the north side of Hwy. 7 East and the east side
of Prospect Street, Alderman Carls moved to reject the purchase. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF CAR IMPOUNDING CONTRACT
It was reported that the car impounding contract with Plowman's ex-
pired the end of November, and Modern Mazda had submitted a proposal
for the contract. After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky, to open it up and advertise for
bids. Motion carried unanimously.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF MCLEOD COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER USING LOBBY AREA OF
RECREATION CENTER FOR MONTHLY PET ADOPTION DAY
City Attorney Schaefer pointed out the animal shelter should provide
proof of liability insurance and enter into an agreement to hold the
City harmless.
Alderman Carls moved to approve the use of the lobby area of the rec-
reation center. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky. The motion was
amended by Alderman Carls to include the City Attorney's concern for
liability insurance and a hold harmless agreement. Amended motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously. Main motion unani-
mously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF POLICY FOR CHRISTMAS EVE CLOSING OF CITY OFFICES
The motion was made by Alderman Carls to approve the policy of closing
City Hall at 3:00 P.M. on December 24. Alderman Torgerson seconded the
motion and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MICHAEL AND PATTI
BLAKE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Alderman Mikulecky made the motion to approve the conditional use per-
mit and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8423. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Torgerson and carried unanimously.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING REQUEST BY TYRONE HELLAND WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to approve the rezoning and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 28/86
and set second reading December 9, 1986. Motion unanimously carried.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DENNIS RADUENZ
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the conditional use permit and to
4
i
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8424. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Carls and carried unanimously.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED FOR
SUPER AMERICA STORE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION
Super America representatives addressed the concerns for a variance and
conditional use permit. After discussion, Alderman Carls moved to ap-
prove the variance and conditional use permit and to waive readings and
adopt Resolutions No. 8425 and No. 8426. Alderman Mlinar seconded the
motion and unanimously carried.
(m) CONSIDERATION OF EQUIPMENT FOR RECREATION CENTER
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to approve the purchase. Motion carried unanimously.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF CITY POLICIES FOR POLICY BOOK
Following considerable discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mik-
ulecky, seconded by Alderman Torgerson, to authorize the City Adminis-
trator to be in charge of approving travel, conferences and schools
requests, to maintain a log book on all miles for the Police Chief and
Investigator's vehicles, and to approve the petty cash policy, cash
policy and special events policy. Motion unanimously carried.
RECESS: The City Council adjourned at 9:42 P.M. for a recess.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF PART-TIME RECEPTIONIST FOR PARKS AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve the recommenda-
tion to hire Sue Larson. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and
unanimously carried.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF TWO SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls, to
approve the service agreements with Power Process for $2,418.75 and
with Waldor Pump for $400/year. Motion carried unanimously.
(q) CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC SALE OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES $3,920,000 ELECTRIC
UTILITY REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
The Utilities Commission's bond consultant from Juran & Moody reviewed
the bond sale and Resolution No. 8428 with the City Council. The mo-
tion was made by Alderman Mlinar to approve the bond sale and to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 8428. Motion seconded by Alderman
Torgerson and carried four to one, with Alderman Mikulecky voting nay.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
(r) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERPRISE FUNDS BUDGET FOR LIQUOR STORE, SEWER/WATER/
REFUSE, AND CENTRAL GARAGE
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve the budgets of
the liquor store, sewer/water/refuse and central garage, with the dele-
tion of two vehicles from the proposal presented at the special meeting
of November 20, 1986, and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8429.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reported Newell Weed had received the petition
form for the Greencastle fire hydrant. It will contain 100 percent
signatures of affected property owners. Mr. Weed requested the fire
hydrant be installed as soon as possible.
Alderman Mlinar moved to give the City Engineer authorization to have
the fire hydrant installed. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson
and unanimously carried.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson commented on a safety problem existing to the south
of the elementary school where the no parking zones are located. The
Hutchinson Safety Council was requesting the Police Department to pro-
vide an officer to be on duty from 7:45 A.M. to 8:15 A.M. and 3:00 P.M.
to 3:30 P.M. whenever possible.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky moved that the Council send Resolution No. 8431 to
MN/DOT requesting the reduction of the speed limit on Highway 7 West
from 50 m.p.h. speed zone to 40 m.p.h., and in the west bound lane that
the 55 m.p.h. sign located at School Road be moved west to Shady Ridge
Road. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unanimously.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland stated he had received a request for the use of Library
Square on December 13, 1986 at 8:30 A.M. for a flag raising ceremony in
conjunction with the 350th anniversary of the National Guard. Alderman
Mlinar moved to approve the request. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls
and unanimously carried.
Mayor Ackland commented on the performance review of the City Attorney.
Attorney Schaefer stated he had a copy of the review.
There was discussion concerning the complaint received regarding local
businesses selling "adult" magazines on open display and XXX rated
C1
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 25, 1986
videos readily available. City Attorney Schaefer reported he had writ-
ten letters to those concerned.
It was reported the Mayor and City Administrator had done a performance
review of the Police Chief today.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Torgerson,
to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Motion
unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
7
0
•
z
.owM C-404
Period inmh,ch
permits issued
PLEASE MAIL ON OR BEFORE THE 4TH DAY OF THE MONTH
wt or
U.S. Dvaw.usCOMMS
F
neesItis ...UsRCE
eu
(platin cxMNml Ary wry In Mae a, e ms)
REPORT OF BUILDING OR ZONING
PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL
PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION
103500 27 8 9999 065 1 0
26 9999 02730
CENSUS USE ONLY
HOMER PITTMAN BLDG OFF
CITY HALL 37 WASHINGTON AVE BEST
HUTCHINSON RN 55350
Has the 9oographie eoveeoge of this permit
system changed during this period?
Ey No F-1 Yes – Explain in comments
If no Pomits wen issued during this
MAIL THIS Bureau of the C....
lease read themsvucnons before
poiod, ..I.,(70 in boa and return
farm 1:1COPY
1201 East Tenth Street
completing torn. For further help.
TO Jeffersonville, Ind. 47132
call collect (301) 763-7244.
Section 1 – NEW RESIDENTIAL HOUSE-
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
Number
Valuational
Number
Valuation of
KEEPING BUILDINGS AND
Item
MOBILE HOMESHO
o
Y1min¢s S
cshuction
rolDmi(dlmhl
Buileln¢s
Hous ire
crosuKtim
fOmul`w.tel
tal
rI�s
ulcl�
u�'�s
One -family houses, detached
101
One -family houses attached. each unit
2 Pe
its
separated from adjoining unit(s) by a
Mal I that extends from ground to roof
102
4
4
249,936
Two-family buildings
103
Three- and four -family buildings
104
Five-ormore family buildings
105
TOTAL (Sum of 107-105)
109
9
10
603,436
Mobile homes
112
1
1
I -------
Is Section II – NEW RESIDENTIAL NON-
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
Numoer
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
HOUSEKEEPING
Iteam
Buildings
Roams
Buildings
Rooms
BUILDINGS
construction
10mif ceras)
construction
IOmir cenlsl
la)
(til
Icl
Idl
lel
Ifl
I 1
Hotels, motels, and tourist cabins
intended for transient accommodations
213
Other nonhousekeeping shelter
214
Section HI – NEW NONRESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
Numlror Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
BUILDINGS
Item
No.
ousmg
Buildin¢s units
Housing corehualion
uildln¢s mita fOmir cm m"
Cmshudion
ftbna cental
lal
Ibl Icl fill
lel 111
I¢I
Amusement and recreational buildings
318
Churches and other rein ,ous buildings
319
Industrial buildings
320
Parking garages (open to general public)
321
Service stations and repair garages
322
Hospitals and other institutional buildin s
323
Office, bank, and professional buildings
324
Public works and utilities buildin s
325
Schools and other educational buildings
326
Scores and other mercantile buildin s327
Other nonresidential buildings
328
2 2 220
Structures other than buildings
329
Section IV – ADDITIONS AND
l ALTERATIONS
C c An increase in the number of housing
.. units (in the housing units column,
cD enter only the number of additional
units)
433
i
No change in the number of
_-
- "
housing units
434
12 4q. San
.. S
A decrease in the number of housing
u n
v
units (in the housing units column,
E
enter only the number of decreased
,c
units)
Residential garages and carports
(attached and detached)
Et]81
All other buildings and structures
106.490
4-5igns rams. u.I roue ua nvcnae wue —►
35 Permits – $781,686.00 Valuation
Tei�CMne
Number E tension
A a code c
contact gd LNtootHom r Pit tman n-r_c151 210
PRIVATELY uew.. Numan
vowsldn of
SeeXOn Y - CONVERSIONS
Xlaaaa vtlaaum Of Housing
hers conana iron Olein[ units
crostraclion
IUmu con.)
Xe. Ildl s Neua1N lgea conn)
nil ants fel IH
fill
UI lal (d ldl
Nonresidential and nonhouseklop'n
buildings
$40
buildings to housekeeping
Housekeeping buildings to nonresidenPal
buildings
541
_
and nonhousekeeP n8
ND
v
Secben VI OF BUILDINGS
.....
RAZING
One.family buildings attached
645 <
and detached
'1
646
Two-family buildings
647
- ..
four -family buildings
Three- and
648
family buildings
a `+ ""�`:""'A•���
Five -or -more
649 000 OR MORE
S50
All other buildings end structures .
FOR INDIVIDUAL PERMITS OF
i permit valued et 5500.
000 or more
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
inform al on for each individual
Seth, VII
Please Drovlde in she space below
I through V.
additional
Valuation or
Number of Number
of
entered m sections
D.vnershlp
Gess of afera Ial (0." cion
eM ad fOmu cenfd
Musing
units building-
Xame ane
owner a amber (el
111 (g)
looIlemeb.
DescriDlion
Id1
Seo.kc)
S.C.
1—v
(sl fal
QPrivate
C1
_C3
Kintl of building
___________
-----------------------
Public
Site address
_ �Pnwte
Kurd Of Writing
------------------
----�-- PWlic
Slk addros5
-------------
OPrivate
Mind of Wilding
_________
Sits address -
0 Nmte
Kind of Wlldmg
_______________--___
--- --_ 0Publi<
So; adNess
�-_----
CPrivate
MiM of Wilding
---------------- ---__--
Q Public
$1I! dddrl55
__________
'
-- _ Private
Kind of Wilding
----------------------- ❑Pualic
Site address
(� Private
KlcA of building
---------------
C3Public
Site address
r'l Private
aild of Wilding
________________ ____
_------ G'Public
Sile address
---���_--
G`PrNals
Kira of WJdmL
----------------------
0 Public
Sltc address
Tei�CMne
Number E tension
A a code c
contact gd LNtootHom r Pit tman n-r_c151 210
. go
•
0
r,.......,,.....,
GII Nun inbumi.0 M�II Louan "V N"
RETAIL "ON SALE"
16tate of Aminnenta, 1(
COUNTY OF...McLeod 1 ,City .UF Hutchinson
111_1.... 1111.
To the CitY..Council__._ 111_1 of the _. CitY _11_11. _......of.. Hutchinson 111__1
..__ _......... _...._....:......._.__._... _1111__ State of Minnesota:
Bob Skinner - Todd Geske - Fred Hintze dba D'Vinci's of Hutchinson
...._.... ._.__. ........._ ._....._....._ 1111._. _................. _ 11.11.... ..................
hereby apply_.....for a license for the term of 6 months __1111
from the. 1.. 1.1 ......... 115th .. _... day of ._December....._... 1___1 1111___, 19 ... 86._., to sell
At Retail Only, Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquors,
as the same aro defined by law, for consumption "ON" those certain premises in the__.......__ ..... ...........
_.
City of Hutchinson
...._1111. ..._......... ....._........... _ 1_11.1
described a follows, tawit:.. .. ......._........ .. _ _.
........_..__
D'Vinci's of Hutchinson
Hwy 7 West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
at which place said applicant.s.operates ...the business of.....__ _full.. service....restaurant................... _.._.._.._
_._ _11.1__1 ....__........ .._........_ 1_11_1
and to that end represent sand state_s.. as, follows
That said applicant s are ....... _ dtizen_S_. of the United States; of foal moral character
_..
and repute; and ha Ve ..attained the age of f1 years; thatthey are. . ... . 1111... proprietor _5.. of the
.......
establishment for uhichthe license will be issued of this application is granted.
Vial no manufacturer of such non-intoxicatinf malt liquors has any ownership, in whole or in part,
in said business of said applicants.or any interest therein;
That said applicants_ make_,... this application pursuant and mbject to all the laws of the State of
Minnesota and the ordinances and regulations of sold ._....Clty..1............._....._..............................11..............._._.......1...1.1.....1...
applicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby agree S..to observe and obey the same;
. _1111_ . ................. 1111...... ....... 1111 .........._..
......____._._...._....._.._.._._......._......._.........._..............................._............
.Inm..x ,IgWnmw4 le ur.bbd ,ernlWaa,1
Each applicant further states that Jae is not nou, the holder of, nor has Jae made application for,
nor does —he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
Dated
November 24
......
.
Appiicant
P. O Address�
—1111. VJ-4,,�Nr 41ti/ SS?b'8
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON THURSDAY,
NOVEMBER 2gTH9 1986.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
PUBLICATION NO. 3636
ASSESSMENT ROLL N0. 223
Project No. 86-14
Hutchinson, Minnesota
November 17, 1986
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given, that the Council will meet at 8_00 P.M. on the
9th dad of December, 1986, in the Council Chambers of City all at Hutchinson,
Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of the
W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of the SN 1/4 of Section 1, Township 116
North, Range 30 West.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection atmtheoffice. l
written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting,
but may consider any objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment
at an adjourned meeting upon further notice to the affected property owners as
it deems advisable.
. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice .with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or Clerk; however, no appeal may be taken as to the amount of any
individual assessment unless a written objection, signed by the affected
property owner, is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing
or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in
its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has
been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed
property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted
under it, may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to
the City Clerk for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this
special assessment on his property.
The total cost of the improvement is $5,523.00.
i�4rNMotz'
;iCty Administrator
Hutchinson, Minnesota
� J
•
0
ORDINANCE NO. 27/86
PUBLICATION NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1025 OF THE 1974 ORDINANCE
CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ENTITLED:
NUISANCES PROHIBITED
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 1025 of the 1974 Ordinance Code of
the City of Hutchinson, entitled "Nuisances Prohibited" is
hereby amended as follows:
"Section 1025:20. Junked Motor Vehicles.
Subdivision 1. Definitions.) For the Duraose of this
applicable: Junked motor vehicle means any motor vehicle
which is Dartiallv dismantled or wrecked and which cannot
Motor vehicle means any self-propelled land vehicle which
can be used for towing or transporting people or
materials, including but not limited to automobiles,
trucxs, buses, motornomes, motorized campers,
motorcycles, motor scooters, tractors, snowmobiles, dune
buggies and other off the road vehicles.
Motor vehicle accessories means any part or parts of any
motor vehicle.
Person includes any individual, firm, partnership or
corporation.
tederal government, state, county, city school board or
other public subdivisions.
Removal means the physical relocation of a motor vehicle
to an authorized location.
Subdivision 2. Prohibited storage.) It shall be
unlawful for any person owning or having custody of any
junked motor vehicle or motor vehicle accessories to
store or permit any such vehicle or accessories to remain
on any private property within the city for a period of
more than thirty days after the expiration of the
7-0-
thirty -day period following receipt of a notice requirin
such removal, and it shall be further unlawful for an
person owning any private property in the city to store
or to permit to remain any such vehicles or accessories
on his property for more than a like period. Such
storage is declared to be a public nuisance and may be
abated or removed and penalties imposed as provided in
this ordinance.
It shall be unlawful for any person, after notification
to remove any junked motor vehicle or motor vehicle
accessories from any private property has been given, to
move the same to any other private propertyupon which
such storage is not permitted or onto any public highway
or other public property for purposes of storage.
Subdivision 3. Permitted storage). This section shall
not apply to any motor vehicle or motor vehicle
accessories stored within an enclosed building, or on the
premises of a business enterprise operatedin a lawful
place and manner when necessary to the operation of such
business enterprise, in a storage place or depository
maintained in a lawful place and manner, or seasonal use .
vehicles such as snowmobiles, motorcycles, motor scooters
and nonmotorized campers. Such business enterprises
shall include auto junk yards, autorepair and auto body
shops but shall not include automobile service stations
or tire, battery and accessory sales stores.
Subdivision 4. Investigation of premises.) The building
inspector on routine inspection orupon receipt of a
complaint may investigate a suspected junked motor
vehicle or motor vehicle accessories and record the make,
model, style and indentification numbers and its
Subdivision 5. Notice of removal.) Whenever the
building inspector or any member of his department finds
or is notified that any junked motor vehicle or motor
vehicle accessories have been stored or permitted to
remain on any private property within the citny, the
building inspector shall send by certified mail a otice
to the owner of record of such motor vehicle or
accessories, if such owner can be ascertained by the
exercise of reasonable diligence, and also to the owner
of the private property, as shown on the tax assessment
records of the city, on which the same is located to
remove thejunked motor vehicle or motor vehicle
accessories within thirty days. Such notice shall also
contain the following additional information:
A. Nature of complaint.
B. Description and location of the motor vehicle
and/or motor vehicle accessories;
C. Statement that the motor vehicle or motor
vehicle accessores will be removed from the premises no
later than thirty days from date of notification;
D. Statement that removal from the location
specified in the notification to another location upon
which such storage is not permitted is prohibited and
shall subject the person to additional penalties;
E. Statement that if removal is made within the
time limits specified, notification shll be given in
writing to the building inspector;
F. Statement of the penalties provided for
noncompliance with such notice.
• Subdivision 6. Outdoor Storage of Pioneer, Classic
collector vehicles or street rods shall be governed b
the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 168.10 Subd. 1 e.
Subdivision 7. Penalty.) Violation of this Section
shall be a misdemeanor.
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect after
its passage and publication.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this day of
, 1986.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
ATTEST:
0 Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
Paul Ackland, Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 28/86
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 464 CONCERNING
ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R-3 Multiple
Family Residence to R-1 Single Family Residence.
Lot 1, Block 4, Helland's First Addition, except the West
130' and except the South 130' thereof, City of Hutchinson
Adopted by the City Council this day of
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plot,
City Clerk
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
7- ��
(612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37'."✓ASS" GTONAVENUEWES
HUT CH'NSON.:AAlNN 55350
DECEMBER 4, 1986
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL..
------------------------------
FROM: KEN MFRRILL., FINANCE DIRECTOR
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: FUND TRANSFER TO 1984 PARKING BONDS
---------------------------------------------------------------
The transfer of tai: increments from area. IV is accomplished
with the accompanying resolution. $276,465 is the total amo_tnt
of dollars captured by area IV if all taxes are collected. Per
c:ounnci.l agreement the capture from this area is for the purpose
of the city portion of parking bond payment.
6-1
RESOLUTION NO. 8432
TRANSFERRING $276,465 FROM 1980 TAX INCREMENT DEBT
SERVICE FUND TO 1984 PARKING IMPROVEMENT FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT $276,465.00 is hereby transferred by the 1980 Tax Increment Debt
Service Fund to the 1984 Parking Improvement Fund for the City's portion of
the parking assessment. All tax increments to be received in 1985 from Area
IV are represented in this amount.
Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of December, 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
L-1
•
•
•
•
TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS
FROM: JURAN 8 MOODY, INC.
DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1986
JURAN & MOODY, INC.
Investment Securities Since 1939
Minnesota Mutual Life Center
400 North Robert Street - Suite 800
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2091
Telephone 612/224-1500
Minn. Wats 1-800-752-4886
Outstate Wats 1-800-328-3833
RE: HUTOiINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA; $3,920,000 ELECTRIC UTILITY REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
This to advise that the above -referenced issue selling Tuesday,
December 9, 1986, with opening and award at 12:15 p.m., C.T., has been
assigned an "A 1" rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
Also, please note corrections. On page 10, paragraph 1, the second
sentence should read "The City...a board of three members which is
charged with operating the electric and yz5 utilities." On page 15,
paragraph (2), line 4, "and the pledge of taxes" should be deleted.
BF/eh
Very truly yours,
Saint Paul, MN - Minneapolis, MN - Houston, TX - Clearwater, FL
4567R,>
Ba,
i,T.:\
ZZlZ02`
7—d'
•
Ll
•
SUMMARY OF BIDS
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
$3,920,000
ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
CLAYTON BROWN d ASSOCIATES, INC. 5.49%
PRUDENT I AL-BACHE SECURITIES, INC. 5.54%
PIPER, JAFFRAY d HOPWOOD INCORPORATED 5.69%
JOHN NUVEEN 8 00. INCORPORATED 5,71%
DAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 5,78%
CLAYTON BROWN d ASSOCIATES, INC.
4.25%
- 1988
4.50%
- 1989
4.75%
- 1990
5.00%
- 1991
5.00%
- 1992
5.25%
- 1993
5.50%
- 1994
5.50%
- 1995
� -d 1
01
TABULATION OF BIDS
HUTUiINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
$3,920,000
ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
AWARD: CLAYTON BROWN d ASSOCIATES, INC.
DATE OF SALE: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1986
RATING: A I
BIDDER INTEREST RATE NET INTEREST ODST
(RATE)
CLAYTON BROWN d 4.25% - 1988
ASSOCIATES, INC. 4.50$ - 1989
Blunt, Ellis d Loewl 4.75% - 1990
Incorporated 5.00% - 1991/92
Griffin, Kubik, Stephens 5.25% - 1993
d Thompson, Inc. 5.50% - 1994/95
PURCHASE PRICE: $3,849,703.49 $1,243,209.01
(5.49%)
PRUDENTIAL-BAOHE 4.40% - 1988
• SECURITIES, INC. 4.60% - 1989 -
Shearson Lehman Brothers 4.80% - 1990
Inc. 5.00% - 1991
Smith Barney, Harris 5.25% - 1992
Upham 4 Co. 5.45% - 1993
Incorporated 5.65% - 1994
Drexel Burnham Lampert 5.80% - 1995
Inc. PURCHASE PRICE: $3,878,840.00 $1,254,842.50
(5.54%)
PIPER, JAFFRAY 8 HOPWOOD 4.25% - 1998
INCORPORATED 4.60% - 1989
E.F. Hutton d Company 4.90% - 1990
Inc. 5.20% - 1991
Robert W. Baird d 5.40% - 1992
Company, Inc. 5.60% - 1993
Craig -Hallus, Inc. 5.80% - 1994
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. 6.00% - 1995
Dougherty, Dawkins, PURCHASE PRICE: $3,876,880.00 $1,289,320.00
Strand 8 Yost, Inc. (5.69%)
John G. Kinnard 8 Co. Inc.
Marcotte, Hume 6 Associates, Inc.
Miller 6 Schroeder Financial Inc.
Moore, Juran and Company, Inc.
M.H. Novick 8 Company, Inc.
JOHN N)YEEN d CO.
4.40% - 1988
INCORPORATED
4.70% - 1989
Hutchinson, Shockey,
5.00% - 1990
Erley d Co.
5.20% - 1991
5.40% - 1992
5.60% - 1993
5.60% - 1994
•
6.00% - 1995
PURCHASE PRICE: $3,876,880.00 $1,293,625.00
(5.715)
PAGE 2
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES OOW41SSION OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
$3,920,000 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
•
BIDDER INTEREST RATE NET INTEREST COST
(RATE)
CAIN BOSWORTH INCORPORATED 4.50% - 1988
Cronin 6 Company, Inc. 4.75% - 1989
Miller Securities, Inc. 5.00% - 1990
Pal ne Webber, Inc. 5.20% - 1991
5.40% - 1992
5.60% - 1993
5.80% - 1994
6.00% - 1995
PURCHASE PRICEi $3,863,160.00 $1,308,802.50
(5.785)
•
L
0 T
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
ANALYSIS t5
(FINAL BID)
CASH FLOW BOND ANALYSIS
$3,920,000 ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS OF
1986 DATE OF ANALYSIS:
DECEMBER 9, 1986
BONDS DATED: DECEMBER I,
1986
PREPARED BY:
BRAD FARNHAM
---------------------------------
__________________________________
_______________________
COVERAGE
PAR ""I OF ISSUE
3920000.00
ACTUAL
RATIO
(12-1) INTEREST
TOTAL DEBT
HET INCE
LESS:
YEAR
PRINCIPAL RATES
INTEREST
SERVICE
BEFORE DEPRECIATION
YEAR
DISCOUNT FACTOR(1.79 PT)
-70296.51
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
LEGAL OPINION (EST.)
-9000.00
1986
0.00
0.00
1986
RECRISTRATION (EST.)
-3500.00
1987
196712.50
196712.50
1987
RESERVE FUND
-392000.00
1988
410000.00 4.25
196712.50
606712.50
2.3UX
1988
BOND PRINTING (EST.)
-1500.00
1989
425000.00 4.50
179287.50
604287.50
2.31%
1989
FISCAL & RATING (EST.)
-22000.00
1990
450000.00 4.75
160162.50
610162.50
2.29X
1990
............
1991
470000.00 5.00
138787.50
608787.50
2.29X
1991
AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CONSTR.
3394000.00
1992
495000.00 5.00
115287.50
610287.50
2.29X
1992
.......6...
1993
525000.00 5.25
90537.50
615537.50
2.27X
1993
(1) A RESERVE FUND EQUAL TO 10% OF THE ISSUE
1994
555000.00 5.50
62975.00
617975.00
2.26X
1994
SIZE MUST 13E PLEDGED FROM THE PROCEEDS
OF THE
1995
590000.00 5.50
32450.00
622450.00
2.24X
1995
BOND SALE.
1996
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
1996
1997
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
1997
1998
0.00 0.DO
0.00
0.00
1998
1999
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
1999
2000
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
2000
2001
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
2001
2002
0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
2002
AVERAGE INTEREST RATE -----------> 5.18%
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
NET EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE _____> 5.49%
3920000.00
1172912.50
5092912.50
2.29X <--4 3/4 YEAR
AVG.
....................................................................................
BOND YEARS ----------------------- > 22640
FIRST
9 MONTHS
4 3/4 YE AN
YEAR ENDING
12-31 ----------------->
1986
1985 1984
1983 1982
AVERAGES
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
BONDS DATED:
DECEMBER 1, 1986
TOTAL SALES
6739272.00
8650586.00 8894201.00
8947519.00 8173454.00
8716848.84
BONDS MATURE:
DECEMBER I, 1988-1996
LESS:
INTEREST:
DECEMBER 1, 1987 & SEMIANNUALLY THEREAFTER
MAINTENANCE, OPERATING,
ON EACH JUNE i AND DECEMBER I.
ACCOUNTING AND ------>
_5642364.00
4386276.00 -7402976.00
.7304019.00 -7045474.00
-7322338.74
OPTION:
DECEMBER 1, 1990 @ PAR
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
PURCHASE PRICE:
$3,900,000
________________________________________________________________________
ESTIMATED DATE OF CLOSING:
DECEMBER 30, 1986
NET INCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION
1096908.00
1264310.00 1491225.00
1643500.00 1127980.00
1394510.11
BOND SALE:
...........
.......
.............. ......
......... ............ ...a
..... .
DATE:
DECEMBER 9, 1986
TIME:
12:15 P.M.
PLACE:
CITY HALL
NOTICE OF BOND SALE PUBLILCATION:
LOCAL PAPER:
NOVEMBER 25, 1986
COMMERCIAL WEST:
NOVEMBER 29, 1986
FINANCE & COMMERCE
NOVEMBER 28, 1986
537L
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
McLEOD COUNTY, MINNESOTA
HELD: DECEMBER 9, 1986
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting
of the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, was
duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 9th day of
December, 1986, at o'clock .M.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION CONCURRING IN THE ACTIN OF
THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
IN ACCEPTING BID ON
SALE AND PROVIDING FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF $3,920,000 ELECTRIC UTILITY
REVENUE BONDS OF 1986
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Utilities Commission of the City
of Hutchinson has adopted a resolution accepting bid on sale
and providing for the issuance of $3,920,000 Electric Utility
Revenue Bonds of 1986 for the purpose of providing funds for
the improvement of municipal electric light plant and system,
which resolution is by reference incorporated in and made a
part of this resolution to the same extent and with the same
force and effect as if set out fully herein, a copy of which is
attached hereto.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, as follows:
40
—y,
The City Council hereby concurs in the resolution adopted
by the Commission accepting bid on sale and providing for the
issuance of. $3,920,000 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds of 1986, •
and hereby joins in and adopts the same resolution, including
all of the covenants and agreements therein contained with the
same force and effect as if said resolution had been adopted by
the City Council.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was seconded by member and upon a vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and
adopted.
2
r -\
L ---J
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF McLEOD
. CITY OF HUTCHINSON
I, the undersigned being the duly qualified and acting
Administrator of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that I have carefully compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes of a meeting of the City Council
of said City held on the date therein indicated, with the
original thereof on file and of record in my office and that
the same is a full, true and complete transcript insofar as the
same relates to the $3,920,000 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds
of 1986.
WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of
• 1986.
Administrator, City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota
3
U]
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
537L
• EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
HELD: DECEMBER 9, 1986
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
meeting of the Hutchinson Utilities Commission (the
"Commission) of the City of Hutchinson. McLeod County,
Minnesota, was duly held at the Hutchinson Utilities Building
in said City on the 9th day of December, 1986, at 12.15 o'clock
P.M. for the purpose of opening, considering bids for and
awarding the sale of $3,920,000 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds
of 1986 of the City.
The following members were present:
and the following were absent:
. The Secretary of the Commission presented affidavits
showing publication of notice of call for bids on $3,920,000
Electric Utility Revenue Bonds of 1986 of the City, for which
bids were to be received at this meeting, in accordance with
the resolution adopted by the Commission on November 24, 1986.
The affidavits were examined, found to comply with the provi-
sions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and were approved and
ordered placed on file.
The Commission proceeded to receive and open bids.for
the sale of the bonds. The following bids were received:
Bidder Interest Rate Net Interest Cost
The Commission then proceeded to consider and discuss
the bids, after which member introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID ON SALE OF
$3,920,000 ELECTRIC UTILITY
REVENUE BONDS OF 1986,
PROVIDING FOR THEIR ISSUANCE
AND PROVIDING FOR DISCHARGE OF PRIOR BONDS
WHEREAS:
A. The City of Hutchinson (the "City") owns and_
operates a municipal electric light and power plant system as a
revenue producing public utility, and there are outstanding
$625,000 Light and Power Plant Revenue Bonds of 1976 (the
"Prior Bonds"), the interest and principal of which constitute
prior liens upon the net revenues of said facility;
B. The Commission has heretofore determined that it
is necessary and expedient to issue on behalf of the City
$3,920,000 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds of 1986 (hereinafter
referred to as the "Bonds" or individually as "Bond"), pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 453 and 475, the City Charter
and a resolution (the "Sale Resolution") adopted by the
Commission on November 24, 1986 to finance improvements to said
municipal electric light plant and system; and
C. In the Sale Resolution the Comission covenanted •
to discharge the Prior Bonds prior to the issuance of the
Bonds.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Hutchinson
Utilities Commission of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. That the bid of
(the "Purchaser") to purchase $3,92 000 Electric Uti ity
Revenue Bonds of 1986 of the City, in accordance with the
notice of bond sale, at the rates of interest hereinafter set
forth, and to pay therefor the sum of $ , plus
interest accrued to settlement, is hereby found, determined and
declared to be the most favorable bid received, and is hereby
accepted and the Bonds are hereby awarded to said bidder. The
Secretary of the Commission is directed to retain the deposit
of said bidder and to forthwith return the good faith checks or
drafts to the unsuccessful bidders. The Bonds shall be payable
as to principal and interest at
or any successor Paying Agent duly
appointed at the Bidder's discretion with approval by the
Commission.
2
2. The Bonds shall be dated December 1, 1986, as the
date of original issue and shall be issued forthwith as fully
registered bonds. The Bonds shall be numbered from R-1 upward,
in the denomination of $5,000 each or in any integral multiple
thereof. The Bonds shall mature, on December 1 in the years
and amounts as follows:
Year Amount
1988
$410,000
1989
425,000
1990
450,000
1991
470,000
1992
495,000
1993
525,000
1994
555,000
1995
590,000
3. The Bonds are issued to provide funds for the
improvement of municipal electric light plant and system in the
City (the "Improvements"). The total cost of the Improvements,
which shall include all costs enumerated in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 475.65, is estimated to be at least equal to the amount
of the Bonds herein authorized. Work on the Improvements shall
proceed with due diligence to completion.
• 4. The Bonds shall bear interest payable
semiannually on June 1 and December 1 of each year commencing
December 1, 1987, at the respective rates per annum set forth
opposite the maturity years as follows:
Maturity Years Interest Rates
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
5. There has heretofore been presented to the
Commission a form of Escrow Agreement (the "Escrow Agreement")
to be entered into by the Commission and
(the "Escrow Agent") to provide
tor-
ischarge of the Prior Bonds. The Agreement is hereby
approved, and the President and Secretary of the Commission
3
0
are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Escrow
Agreement on behalf of the Commission and the City. Prior to
issuance of the Bonds, there shall be transferred to the Escrow
Agent from the Surplus Account in the Light and Power Fund cash
in an amount sufficient to discharge the Prior Bonds, all as
provided in the Escrow Agreement.
6. Notwithstanding the provisions in the Sale
Resolution to the contrary, if the Bonds are purchased at a
discount greater than 28 of the face amount of the Bonds, (a)
the amount of Bond proceeds used to fund the Reserve Account
(as defined in the Sale Resolution) shall not exceed 108 of the
difference between the face amount of the Bonds and the
discount at which the Bonds were purchased and (b) sums in the
Surplus Account (as defined in the Sale Resolution) shall on or
before issuance of the Bonds be credited to the Reserve Account
in an amount which, together with Bond proceeds used to fund
the Reserve Fund, equals $392,000 (i.e. 10% of the face amount
of the Bonds).
The motion for the adoptin of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
•
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed
and adopted.
n
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF MCLEOD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting
Secretary of the Hutchinson Utilities Commission of the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared
the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original
thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true
and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the
Commission of said City, duly called and held on the date
therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the
opening and considering of bids for, and awarding the sale of
• $3,920,000 Electric Utility Revenue Bonds of 1986 of said City.
WITNESS my hand as such Secretary this day of
, 1986.
0
Secretary of the Hutchinson
Utilities Commission
5
imffHUTCHINSON,
(612) 587.5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHING TONAVENUEWEST
MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 7, 1986
T0: Mayor & City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Marlow V. Priebe, Director of Engineering
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Reconstruction of Streets
------------------------------
To my knowledge the City has only reconstructed one street, that being
Main Street from Fifth Avenue South to Fourth Avenue North (T.H. 7), which
was done in 1968. The surfacing and curb and gutter assessment for the
residential portion was $7.09 per front foot. Other street improvement
projects at that time were $11.60 per front foot.
A few years ago one block of Main Street North from Fourth Avenue North to
Fifth Avenue North was widened and overlayed by the Department of Transpor-
tation. No assessment was made for the City's share of the project because
it was not considered reconstruction.
Earlier this year some streets that were scheduled for an overlay were found
to be in very poor condition. It was determined that an overlay was not cost
effective. Itwas decided to provide reasonable maintenance on them for about
three years and then reconstruct them. At that time it was determined that
an assessment policy would have to be formulated before the reconstruction
of these streets occurred.
It is my opinion that the work programed on T.H. 15 South is a reconstruction
project, at least as far as the City share of the cost is concerned.
Based on the fact that Chapter 429 will probably be used for most reconstruc-
tion projects and that funding will be provided by bonding, at least 20% of
the cost will have to be assessed. Therefore, an assessment policy for street
reconstruction could be adopted that would assess 20% of the cost to proper-
ties based an the short side frontage of the property.
Based on 1986 grading, base and surfacing assessment cost of $25.79 per front
• foot for residential property and $50.92 per front foot for commercial property,
the assessment for Main Street would be $5.16 and $10.18 per front foot re-
spectively. Inasmuch as funds other than bonds are available, the assessment
cost could be rounded off to $5.00 and $10.00.
/ms
(612) 587-5151
• f/UTCN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M 0
DATE: November 13, 1986
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRCM: Director of Engineering
RE: 1987 improvement Projects
To date, action has been taken on six (6) projects due to requests received.
The total 1987 Improvement program should be reviewed and a decision made as
to which projects should proceed. The attached proposed program should
provide the necessary data for this decision. I recommend the program be
studied and action taken at the next meeting on December 9th.
• If cost estimates are desired, they could be furnished for the next meeting.
Said estimate would not be the same as the Engineer's Report based on
detailed study. It would give you an idea of the cost of the proposed
construction.
MVP/pv
attachment
U
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
1987 PROJECTS
ORDERED
HELD.
ORDERED
PROJECT
ENGINEER
IMPROVEMENT
PLANS AND
NO.
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
LOCATION
REASON
REPORT
HEARING
SPECIFICATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS DATA
Yea
87-01
Storm Sewer. Rem A Appurtenances
Robert's First Addition
Area Residents
Yea
Yea
10-14-86
Grade, Gravel Base, Surfacing, Curb
No. Side 7/22 from School
Yea
Contacting Owners for R/W
87-02
and Gutter A Appurtenances
Rd. to Big Bear Site
Big Bear Request
9-9-86
before completing rmg. Report
No. Side TH 7/22 from School
Contacting Owners for BIN
Rd. to Big Bear, Between Big
Bear/Tom Thumb A Across No.
Grade, Gravel Base, Surfacing, Curb
Side Tom Thumb Site to
Yee
Contacting Owners for N/W
81-03
and Outter A Appurtenances
California St.
Bic Bur Request
-9-86
before comploting Ena. Report
No. Side TH 7/22 Between Big
Beer/Som Thumb A Across No.
Crede, Gravel Base, Surfacing, Curb
Side Tom Thumb Site to
YeaContacting
Owners for N/W
87-04
and Gutter A Appurtenances
California St.
BS Bear Re ueat
9-9-86
before completing . Re rt
Prop. in Block A7, N 1/2
Blk. A7 Area
Yes
87-05
Storm Sewer A Appurtenances
A Portion Maplewood Academy
Resident Reguest
Yea
Yea
10-14-86
Signal Lights, Turn Lanes, Curb and
MN. DOT Project
MN DOT
PAU Funding being reviewed.
Gutter, Surfacing, Sidewalk, Etc...,
T.H. 15 (Main St.) from
to be let In
Data
Construction period from
87-06
A Appurtenances
Fifth Avenue
July 1 1987
Submited
Yee
9-1-1987 to 9-1-1988
8th Ave. N.M. from School Rd
to Colorado St, Colorado St
Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter A
from 8th Ave. N.W. to North
Subdivision
87-07
Appurtenances
Termini A Colorado Court
Agreement
Service to all Blk. 1, Lots
Sanitary Sever, Watermain, Storm
1,2 A 4 Blk. 2 A Lots 1 thru
Sewer, Street Grading, Gravel Base
5, Blk. 4, All in Plaza
Subdivision
87-08
A Appurtenances
Heights Subdivision
Agreement
Campbell Lane in Clark's 2nd
Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter A
Add., Campbell Lake Add. A
Subdivision
87-09
Appurtenances
Woodridge Add.
Agreement
So. Robert's Rd. A Sibley
Ave. in Third Addition to
Petition by
87-10
Bituminous Surfacing A Appurtenances
Lakewood Terrace
Residents
Request of Owner
Bradford St. in Schmidtbauer
A Developer A as
87-11
Bituminous Surfacing A Appurtenances
2nd Add. A Orchard Park let
Per Subd. Agrt.
Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel, Curb
Shady Ridge Rd. from TM 7/22
Council Request
R/W Needed from Mel Zimmer
87-12
A Gutter Surfacing A Appurtenances
to Hilltop Addition
for 1987 Pro ram
before E lneer's Report
East Side of TH 15 from
Century Ave. to No. Line of
Tied with Prod.17
Must ba Done Betoro MW DOT
87-1
Widen A Relocate Service Road
Firstate Federal Site
87-06
Pro ect Be ins
1987 PROJECTS
ORDERED
HELD
ORDERED
PROJECT
ENGINEER
IMPROVEMENT
PLANS AND
NO.
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
LOCATION
REASON
REPORT
HEARING
SPECIFICATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS DATA
From First Ave. S.E. 6 Erie
Infiltration in
Relocate New Sanitary Sewer Trunk
St. to Washington Ave. East
Old Trunk Line.
Final Replacement Between
87-14
Line
of Monroe St.
Staff Recommend.
Amoco Plant A Tartan Park
From Firth Ave. A Bluff St.
In Conjunction
to Fifth Ave. A Clark St. to
with Wastewater
From 6th A Carlisle to 6th A
Relocate and Increase Size of
Sixth Ave. 8 Clark St. to
Proj. by Donohue
Prospect to be replaced under
87-15
Sanitary Sewer LIne
Sixth Ave. A Prospect St.
Staff Recommend.
Wastewater Project by Donohue
From Old Line West Side
Line has been a problem. No
Harmony Lane to Centerline
Remove Line from
access to it. Work to be done
of Harmony Lane to Old Line
Under House
in conjunction with with
87-16
Relocate Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line
North of Harmony Lane
Staff Recommend.
lWastewater
Proj. by Donohue
On Wagner Property and from
Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Lift
Wagner Property to New
Requested by
87-17
Station and Appurtenances
School Site
School District
Estimated Cost Made in 1986
On School Rd from New School
Site to South Grade Rd 8 on
Staff
87-18
12" A 8" Watermain Loop 6 ApPurt.
South Grade Rd to Dale St.
Recommendation
Estimated Cost Made in 1986
To be constructed in
From Arch St. to T.N. 22 by
conjunction with Force Main
New Wastewater Treatment
Staff
on Wastewater Treatment
87-19,12-
Watermain Loop.& Appurtenances
Plant
Recommendation
Project by Donohue
Over burden to be used in
Plant construction. Granular
material to be stockpiled for
New Wastewater Treatment
Staff
future use. Total site can be
87-20
Gravel Excavation A Appurtenances
Site
Recommendation
landscaped.
4th Ave. N.E. from Bluff St.
Grade, Gravel Base, Curb and Outter,
to High St, A High St. from
Staff
87-21
Surfacing and Appurenances
4th Ave. N.E. to T.H. 7 East
Reoommendation
From let Ave. N.M. A Main St
to Franklin St. A Franklin
New line for added capacity
St. from let Ave. N.W. to
Staff'
needed before street
87-22
Storm Sewer Reconstruction A Appurt.
Washington Ave.
Recommendation
construction.
87-23
Surfacing A Appurtenances
Arena Parking Lot
City Council
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm
Carolina Avenue from
Developer An Per
Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base 6
California St. to 150• East
Subdivision
87-24
Appurtenances
of School Rd.
Agreement
Grade, Gravel Baas, Storm Sewer A
Hilltop Drive from Michigan
Staff
87-25
Appurtenances
St. to Paula Road
Recommendation
1986 Public Works Report
First Ave. S.E. from Monroe
Staff
87-26
6" Watermain 6 Appurtenances
St. to Huron St.
Recommendation
1906 Public Works Report
1oR7 RRn.ivrTS
ORDERED
HELD
ORDERED
PROJECT
ENGINEER
IMPROVEMENT
PLANS AND
NO.
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
LOCATION
REASON
REPORT
HEARING
SPECIFICATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS DATA
Huron St. from First Ave.
Staff
87-27
6" Watermain A Appurtenances
S.E. to Second Ave. S.E.
Recommendation
1986 Public Works Report
Erle St. from First Ave.
Staff
87-28
6" Watermain A Appurtenances
S.R. to Second Ave. S.E.
Recommendation
1986 Public Works Report
Boston St. from Atlanta Ave.
Staff
87-29
Surfacing and Appurtenances
to Baltimore Ave.
Recommendation
1986 Public Works Report
Baltimore Ave. from Boston
Staff
87-30
Surfacing and ApEurtenances
St. to T.N. 15
Recommendation
1986 Public Works Report
From Les Eouba Parkway to
Property Owner
T.H. 7/22 West at West End
HCI
87-31
24" Storm Sewer and Appurtenances
of Third Avenue N.W.
Request
Roberta Road from End of
87-32
Sidewalk and Appurtenances
Curb to Roberta Park
Council Re asst
Ll
Minnesota Pollution Control
December 5, 1986
�\s
Mr. Gary Plotz, City Administrator P\
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
t
Dear Mr. Plotz:
Re: City of Hutchinson
Wastewater Treatment Construction Grant
C271363 03
�1,::�
I would like to advise the City of it's current status within the
Construction Grants Program in the hope that this information will
• assist the City in it's own efforts at scheduling tasks associated with
the project.
Based on the fact that the City's Environmental Assessment (EA) was
placed on notice December 4, 1986, this Agency can now better project
when the Step 3 grant will be awarded. Following is the schedule within
which this Agency is working:
Step 3 Application Reviewed
and comments transmitted to City/Consultant 18 Dec 86
Response from City 28 Dec 86
Application Review Complete 2 Jan 87
EA off -notice & Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) issued 5 Jan 87
Facilities Plan Certified by MPCA 5 Jan 87
Plans & Specifications Approved by MPCA 5 Jan 87
Grant Application Certified to EPA 5 Jan 87
2Z
Grant Awarded by EPA 5 Feb 87
• EPA has up to 45 days to award or deny
Phone: (619)'196-7 05
520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/MarshalURochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Gary Plotz, City Administrator •
Page 2
As the City is aware, the schedule that will be incorporated into the
Grant document reflects initiation of operation by July 1, 1988, in
compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act. If it becomes
apparent that the City is unlikely to meet this date, we will require
the negotiation of a formal Consent Decree establishing a legally
enforceable schedule for compliance beyond the July 1, 1988 deadline.
Your proposed schedule projects an initiation of construction date of
April 1, 1987. The Agency fully concurs with your assessment that you
will need to meet this date in order to be in compliance by July 1,
1988, therefore you may need to consider bid advertisement prior to
grant award even though the costs incurred prior to the actual award
date will not be grant eligible.
I want to inform you that funds are available via a Congressional
Continuing Resolution for the Fiscal Year 1987 Construction Grants
Program. We will not have to wait for the reauthorization of the Clean
Water Act in order to award the City of Hutchinson's Step 3 Grant.
If you have any questions, or need further clarification, please contact
myself or Jeanne Eggleston, Grants Project Manager, at (612)296-7169.
Sincerely, •
Keith H. ess, Chief
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Section
Division of Water Quality
KNN/JAE:rbj
cc: Donald F. Roecker, Donohue & Associates, Inc.
r1
U
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - OCTOBER 28, 1986
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT ON THIRD AVENUE NORTHWEST
Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the request
and refer it to the Hutchinson Utilities. Motion seconded by Alderman
Carls and unanimously carried.
(c) UPDATE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT BY DONOHUE 6 ASSOCIATES
Mr. Jim Miller of Donohue 8 Associates presented an update on the
wastewater treatment plant project. He reported on a reduction of Step
III engineering fees due to the removal of the filters from the plan
and specifications, an amendment to Step II Engineering Agreement for
increased costs, and the establishment of an advertisement date in mid
December with bid opening in late January and construction start by
April 1, 1987.
Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to approve Amendment No. 1
to Step II Engineering Agreement increasing the City's cost from $633,-
000 to $657,000. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
Alderman Carls moved to approve the Engineering Agreement for Step III
Construction and Operation Related Services with the new figure quoted
by Donohue for a reduction to the City of $1,054,000 (including a fixed
fee of $128,000). Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and carried unani-
mously.
Mr. Miller commented that there would be an upper limit of an addi-
tional $3,000 cost to finalize the draft grant package for grant ap-
proval by November 24. This cost would be non -fundable from MPCA.
Following discussion, no action was taken by the Council.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 8412 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8412.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF APPRAISALS FOR EMMA LAKE PROPERTY (DEFERRED 10-14-86)
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to authorize advertising
for bids to remove or demolish the house at 115 Franklin North. Motion
seconded by Alderman Carls and carried unanimously.
5 g
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
M E M 0 Chief. Orlin "Butch" Henke
Date—December 3,_1986
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Sale of 4 Fire Dept. Pagers
Request that the City Councilallow the Fire Dept. to sell 4 pagers.
We would be selling 2 pages to 3M Co. They would be used for early
warning of storms or for use during any hazardous incident in the
city that their employees should know about.
1 would be sold to KDUZ Radio. KDUZ presently has 1 pager but Larry
• Graf has told me that they would like one more.
The fourth one would be sold to The Hutchinson Leader for their
reporters. The Leader presently has 1 also but would like to have
2 pagers.
We are asking $200.00 for each pager this seems to be a good price
for both parties.
The Fire Dept. would want the money from the sales of the 4 pagers
to invest into 2 new pagers.
The Fire Dept presently has 7 pagers that are spares. We would like
to sell as many as we can at this price so that we can start to
replace them slowly because of the high cost of total replacement.
0
•
•
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Arnold Rotzien, Chairman
Senior Advisory Board
Re: _Request for Building Fund
Date: December 3, 1986
The Senior Advisory Board is currently monitoring an account
in which fund-raising money and memorials are put into. These
monies help purchase equipment for the Hutchinson Senior Center.
Due to a recent development, that of Emma Lake's will leaving
5% of her estate to the Senior Citizens of Hutchinson if a
building fund exists, the Senior Advisory Board requests per-
mission from the Council to govern a second account; a
Building Fund. This fund would be used for future building or
purchase of property(ies) for use by senior citizens. Additional
monies by way of donations or fund raising which are "ear marked"
for building would also be put into this account from time to
time.
Please refer to previous letters sent to the Council from the
Senior Advisory Board showing concern for future expansion which
should support our request for starting a Building Fund.
Thank you for your considerations.
q -(p
115 South Jefferson Street •
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 587.6564
To: Mayor Ackland & City Council
From: Senior Center Advisory Board
Re: Property east of Senior Center
The Senior Center Advisory Board tries to reflect the needs
and concerns of all area senior citizens. Our municipal Senior
Center has become a focal point for senior citizens' programming
throughout the community. We are deeply concerned about the
City Council's selection of property for the new police station.
At this time, the property just east of the SeniorCenter -is:,being
used quite often during the summermonths; it is ;the only open
space which allows us to schedule outdoor activities through the
Center. i.e. picnics, horseshoes, croquet, gardening courses, etc.
As outdoor equipment such as picnic tables, barbecue grills, etc.
are purchased through our United Way Grant and fund-raising
efforts by our seniors, our intentions are to use this outdoor
area even more.
In addition, the Council should be aware ofthe fact that participa-
tion levels at the Senior Center have grown considerably over its'
first 4 years of operation. Future expansion of•.anylkind=can-only
take place in the direction of the property being considered.
Our final concern is in regards to the heavy traffic and noise that
a police station would create. Once again, our concerns come from
the entire community's population of senior citizens.
Thank you for your considerations.
Sincerely,=-
Arnold Rotzien, Chairman
Senior Advisory Board
-C 1
115 South Jefferson Street
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 587-6564
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
(XIC40�
JUL1984 CEIL
er
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Senior Center Advisory Board
It is the expressed desire of the Senior Advisory Board
that the city consider the property east of the Senior
Center as a future site for expansion to our Center.
It is our hope that the Council would consult with the
Senior Advisory Board if other considerations regarding
this property are being made.
Thank -you for your attention.
Sincerely,
i
J. Harold Beytien,
7/84 Senior Advisory Board Chairmar
(612) 587-5151
%1UllH" CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST'
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
November 24, 1986
Gary D. Plotz
Hutchinson City Administrator
HUTCHINSON CITY HALL
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Gary:
I have on this date received a communication from
George Field concerning the house located at 239 5th Avenue
Southwest. This property has not been repaired or removed as
per the order of August 18, 1986. Fire Marshal George Field
now requests that the municipality take the appropriate action
• necessary to remove the structure. This must be done
according to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 463.15
through 463.261. The first step in this procedure is to have
the Council adopt a "Notice of Order to Repair or Remove" and
serve this document upon the owners of record, Melvin and Jan
Klockmann. I am enclosing the original and two copies of such
a document. This document may be adopted at the next council
meeting. Upon its adoption and its signature, the documents
should be taken to the Hutchinson Police Department where the
copies will be served upon the Klockmanns. Upon service, the
Klockmanns have twenty days in which to file an answer. If no
answer is filed and no removal or repair has been accomplished
within thirty days from the date of the service, the city may
obtain a court order authorizing the removal of the building.
This is accomplished by filing a copy of the order signed by
the Mayor with proof of service with the District Court at
least five days prior to filing a motion requesting authority
to enforce the order. At the time we file the proof of
service we must also file a Notice of Lis Pendants with the
County Recorder describing the lands affected and the nature
of the order. Within five days from the filing of that motion
we may go into District Court and obtain an order fixing a
time for removal. When removal has been made, the costs of
repair or removal may be assessed to the property itself.
Scerely you s
Ja es H. Schaefrl
Hutchinson City Attorney
0
NOTICE OF ORDER TO REPAIR OR REMOVE
TO MELVIN KLOCKMANN AND JAN KLOCKMANN: Pursuant
to the authority of Minnesota Statutes 463.15 through 463.261
you are individually and collectively ordered to repair or
remove the structure located 239 5th Avenue SW, Hutchinson,
Minnesota, 55350, legally described as: Lot Eleven (11)
excepting the East 18 feet thereof, Block 53, South Half, City
of Hutchinson. ,
Said structure constitutes a "hazardous building"
as defined by Minnesota Statutes 463.15 Subdivision 3. In
that because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, physical
damage, and/or abandonment said structure constitutes a fire
hazard and a hazard to public safety and health. Repair of
said structure shall include, but is not limited
•
to: (a) Removal of all flammable materials from the interior
of the structure; (b) Removal of all debris from the exterior
and surrounding area; (c) Securing all entrances, exists and
windows; (d) Sealing any openings to the structure;
(e) Extermination of rodents; (f) Securing the 6' x 6' x 5'
deep hole on the northeast side of the structure;
(g) Bringing said structure up to the standards of the
Uniform Building Code. For further information on necessary
repairs, contact the office of the Hutchinson Fire Marshal.
These repairs shall be made within thirty days (30) of the
date of this Order. A motion for summary enforcement of the
order will be made to the District Court of McLeod County,
First Judicial District of the State of Minnesota unless
corrective action is taken or an answer filed within twenty
(20) days from the date of service of this notice. The cost
of any corrective action taken by the City of Hutchinson
0
pursuant to Court order, including cost of repair, removal or
enforcement, shall be charged against the real estate as
provided by Minnesota Statutes 463.21.
Adopted this day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Clerk
•
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By/
Paul Ackland, Mayor
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE November 19, 1986
TO The Mayor, The Hutchinson City Council, Hazel Sitz and Chief O'Borskv
FROM Scott Webb and Michael Kirchoff, Police Patrolman Representatives
SUBJECT Extending Police Patrolman's Longevity Pay Plan
We would like to submit for your approval an extension to the Police Patrol-
man's longevity pay plan.
Our current pay plan is explained below. A new patrolman starts out at
Grade X, five percent above minimum rate. After the completion of one year
of service a five percent increase shall be granted. Likewise, a five percent
increase shall be granted after completion of two years employment and again
after three years employment. Thereafter, length of service shall be recognized
as follows:
On completion of 5 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 7 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 9 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 11 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 13 years service, 1 percent additional
After 13 years of service our current pay plan allows for no more pay in-
creases.
• All other city employees are eligible for merit increases throughout their
careers. Sinceweare not eligible to receive merit increases and our longevity
plan ends at 13 years of service we would like to recommend that our longevity
pay plan be extended out to recognize further years of dedicated employment.
Our pay grade currently allows for a 5% pay increase without putting us
over the maximum limit.
We would recommend that we receive.an additional one percent increase every
two years. Thus the pay plan would look like this.
On completion of 5 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 7 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 9 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 11 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 13 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 15 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 17 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 19 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 21 years service, 1 percent additional
On completion of 23 years service, 1 percent additional
At this rate after 15 years employment it would take a Patrolman another
eight years to acquire the additional 5% increase.
The Police Department c,irrently has one Patrolman who just completed his
15th year of employment. We also have more men who will be nearing that mark
• in the next few years.
We believe that now is the best time to implement such a program. At the
time being it only concerns one Patrolman and the cost to the City would be
minimal.
Thank you,
Scott Webb and Michael Kirchoff, Employee Representative Patrolmen 7
(1612)587.5151TYOF HUTCHI ON
ASNI eTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
Decenber 4, 1986
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FRCM: HAZEL SITZ, PERSONNEL COOIOINATOR 5
a •• « •�r •• r r. a
Attached is a request fran police patrol representatives, along with
survey information obtained by them.
Cir: I have attached also for your information an exerpt of
Hutchinson's present pay plan, showing patrol officer pay grade and
other information. •
Our pay plan was designed with the intent that it should not be "easy"
or "autanatic" to reach the top pay level, and in fact crost long term
employees of the city are not near that level. I: therefore believe we
should retain the policy that max mmn rate in any grade will be
reserved for exceptional merit after long term employment.
An "autanatic" system would probably be favored by most employees.
An alternative for the future would be to change to an autamati.c or
longevity plan for a ployees in all pay grades, if this is preferred
by the Council.
•
• 0
EXERPT OF CITY PAY PLAN - 1986 - POLICE PATROL OFFICER PAY GRADE
GRADE LEVEL 0 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5
X N/A N/A 9.80/hr 10.34/hr 10.89/hr 11.43/hr
1698/mo 1792/mo 1887/mo 1981/mo
(Start) (1 Yr.) (2 Yr.) (3 Yr.)/
11.53
(5
Yr -1
11.64
(7
Yr.)
11.75
(9
Yr.)
11.87
(11
Yr.)
City Policies State:
LEVEL 6 LEVEL 7
11.98 12.5?/hr
2076 2169/mo
(13 Yr.)
"Mauimam rate in any grade will be reserved for exoeptional merit after long term cloyment."
-Pay Plan Resolution
"Employees (other than police patrol officers) can reasonably expect to reach midpoint (Level 4) after
about 5 years of employment, with good performance reviews."
-Pay Equity Report to State 1985
(reflecting actual practice)
"Merit increases are limited to 48 for employees below Level 4, 2% for
eapIcyees above Level 4."
-Council Policy adopted 1986
CITY STARTING PAY
n11AMa
END 3 YEAR END 13-15 YEAR END 25 YEAR CCMEW
HTIMNSON
9.80/1698
11.43/1981
11.98/2076
+5%
11.98/2076
+5%
12.52/2169 is Level 7
(would be 10% over bas
FAIMM
(+3%-1987)
10.76/1865
11.45/1985
11.68/2024
+7%
12.60/2183
+10%
ALEXANDRIA
(+3.5%-1987)
9.62/1665
11.63/2017
12.10/2097
+4%
12.56/2178
+8%
ST. CLom
?
?
+1.48 approx.
($288)
+3% approx.
($600)
iF7FLi)
?
?
+38
+5%
FERGUS FALLS
?
?
+58
+6% (18 yrs)
MANKAM
?
?
+3.7%
+7.58
+10% after 30 years
e)
n
U
0
0
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF FAIRMONT
AND THE FAIRMONT POLICE ASSOCIATION
Compensation and Benefits 1986 and 1987
It is agreed between both parties that the employees represented by the
Fairmont Police Officers Association including all Patrolman, Sergeants, and
the Animal Control/Part-time Patrol Officers shall be compensated by the City
of Fairmont during the period January 1, 1986 through December 31, 1987 as
follows:
Wages: The following salaries shall become effective:
Patrolman
Sergeant
Animal Control/
Part-time Patrol Officer
•:.
$ 1,985.72/month
2,122.59/month
1,700.24/month
1987
$ 2,045.29/month
2,186.26/month
1,751.24/month
The monthly salaries as outlined in this Agreement are based upon a 40 hour
work week. Duties performed over and above this shall be paid in one half
(1/2) hour increments at time and one half Wj) the regular rate of pay. At
the request of his Supervisor an employee may be called out to work other than
his regular scheduled shift. He shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay
at time and one half (1;1) the regular rate of pay. All overtime shall be dis-
tributed as equally as possible among the. employees on an annual basis.
Newly hired patrolmen shall be paid at a rate of $120.00/month below the current
patrolman rate. At the successful completion of six (6) months employment, the
patrolman's salary shall be increased by $20.00/month. Each subsequent six (6)
month anniversary the rate 'shall be increased by $20.00/month upon successful
completion of three (3) years service the employee shall be paid the full rate
established for the patrolman position.
Longevity: All employees represented by this Agreement shall be eligible
for longevity pay based on their anniversary date, using the following formula:
YEARS OF SERVICE
5 _
10
15
20
25
LONGEVITY PAY
1% of Patrolman Wage
vh .. 3% of Patrolman Wage
6% of Patrolman Wage
7$ of Patrolman Wage
8% of Patrolman Wage
10% of Patrolman Wage
the
directly or indirectly#
authorized
the Federation caused or ,
•
strike. ARTICLE Vill
Pa
figures based on
pAY monthly P januarY
Compensation (Calculate in in exletenca from
A month) shall be
an average 174 hour work
pecember 31, 19871 1s
1. 1986 through1986
$1,725.83
at year, $1.667.47
$
patrolman $1,740.35 1,801.26
2nd years $10991.03
Patrolman $1.91A.04
3rd Year:
patrolman ' $2,088.50
ear 017.87
patrolman - Attheand reafters$2
Per month
_ additional $75.00 p
Per hour
$ergeante al $. P •
I _ addi0ion_ 62 6100 a.m.)
Shift differentia(610 P m. for each full
two oera =vioegto a maximum of
additional
Longevity five (5) years
eight percent ( of two
All officers shall receive a minimum
earanCes when not
Court times rates all court aPP
Cour
e� for t appear -
hours at regular Pay
d to be on duty. and shall be paid for all
schedule a two-hour minimumo
a rate
ance time in excH8s of th shall be paid at a double
All officersMinnesota Statues
C. Holidays, s set forth by
time worked on
for all holiday
to-wits
11 the third
645.44(5). �s paY� January ,s Birthday.
(1) New Year and Lincoln
(2) washing in Februarys
Martin Luther King pay
(3)
-8-
St. Cloud Police Department
Reach top patrolman after 5 years service
Longevity is paid in lump sum at beginning of each year. After that
example of amounts:
After
7
years
of
service
$ 84.00
After
8
years
of
service
144.00
After
16
years
of
service
288.00
After
17
years
of
service
408.00
After
25
years
of
service
600.00
is
•
ARTICLE XIV:
V 0 R177 Al -E -Gd
SEVERANCE PAY
PPL /CC
Severance pay shall be granted upon termination of
employment to the extent of one-third (1/3) of all unused sick
leave (with severance pay calculated on a maximum of 38 days)
provided, however, that the following conditions apply:
1) After seven (7) years continuous service with
the City
2) After honorable severance.
If an employee dies while in the employment of the City,
the severance pay that he/she would have been entitled to under
the above conditions shall be paid to his/tier estate.
ARTICLE XV: LONGEVITY
Employees shall receive longevity pay according to the
following schedule:
1% of base salary after 5th anniversary of employment
2% of base salary after 10th anniversary of employment
3% of base salary after 15th anniversary of employment
4% of base salary after 20th anniversary of employment
5% of base salary after 25th anniversary of employment
The City Recorder shall compute longevity pay to the nearest
month of the anniversary year and it shall be paid in December of
each year.
Longevity shall be computed on base pay as defined in
Section XIX.
ARTICLE XVI: LIFE, HEALTH, AND HOSPITAL INSURANCE
The City agrees to provide $10,000 term life insurance with
All and D rider and Disability insurance for each employee, at the
City's cost.
-13-
0
•
F %C -PoL/CC
•Written reprimands, notices of suspension and notices of discharge which are
to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and
acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the Union will
receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices.
Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable
times under the direct supervision of the employer.
Grievances relating to this Article may be initiated by the Union in Step 3 of
the grievance procedure under Article VI.
ARTICLE 14 WAGES
14.1 All employees shall be paid in accordance with Schedule "A"
attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement.
14.2 When a job not covered by Schedule A is established, the Employer
may designate a job classification and rate structure for it. The Union shall
have the right to submit a grievance concerning such classification and rate
.at Step 3 of the grievance procedure provided in Article 6.
14.3 In addition to the rates of pay set forth in Schedule A, employees
shall earn longevity benefits on the following basis:
1. An increase of 1% of the regular base pay after completing
the third year of employment.
'ivy. . ;r•:.
2. An additional 1% of the then regular base pay after completing
the sixth year of employment.
3. An additional 1% of the then regular base pay after completing
- the ninth year of employment.:
4. An additional 1% of the then regular base pay after completing
the twelfth year of employment.
5. An additional 1% of the then regular base pay after completing
the fifteenth year of employment.
6. An additional 1% of the then regular base pay after completing
the eighteenth year of employment. Only regular full-time
hourly and monthly service shall constitute length of service
for longevity purposes. Anniversary dates will be computed
as of the first of the month. Longevity will be computed
on the employee's current monthly salary. Whenever an
employee has a break in service, only that time which he is
listed on the payroll for regular full time service will be
considered for longevity purposes. Longevity computed
on the above schedule may exceed the maximum salary range
. of Schedule A.
- 12 -
21
-'ATICLE XX. LONGEVITY
The following percentages shaal"2ontrol in computing longevity:
20.1 One percent (11) increase over and above base wage after completing the
fifth (5th) year of service. -
20.2 Two and one-quarter percent (2 1/41) over and above base wage after
completing the tenth (10th) year of service.
20.3 Three and three-quarter percent (3 3/4X) over and above base wage after
completing the fifteenth (15th) year of service.
20.4 Five and one-half percent (5 1/2X) over and above base wage after
completing the twentieth (20th) year of service.
20.5 Seven and one-half percent (7 1/21) over and above base wage after
completing the twenty-fifth (25th) year of service.
Ten percent (101) over and above base salary after completing thirty
(30) years of service. •
( 20.7 Only regular full time, hourly or monthly service shall constitute
length of service for longevity purposes. Anniversary dates will be computed
as of the first of the month.
20.8 Whenever an officer or employee has a break in service, only that time
which he/she is listed on the payroll for full time monthly service will be
considered for longevity purposes.
20.9 Longevity computed on the above schedule may exceed the maximum salary
-. - range by the amount of longevity which is set in compensation schedules.
'��: * �,'......�....w..rrawlw«= � - -- -• Mrrt►n:..,.+n.Aa.w� r � � .. ,_ :- *+a.'Wi�.��• - y.r-
(612) 587-5151
. f/UTCN'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
_- HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
December 4, 1986
MEMORANDUM
MPMR AND CITY COUNCIL
1
,■ nPERSONNEL
•� r■■ ■ n ■
'! J:_)9.■�1 :�. ■Wu17��D1 Y �;� y■: _�I�l S .kH 2■. I `1liuli��i
Attached is the most recent information available from the U.S.
Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, showing various tables
of the Employment Cost Index (BCI)_ for the 12 months ending
September, 1986. This is similar information to that provided
you a year ago.
• Table 2 shows a 12 month increase for private industry workers
of 3. % and a 12 month increase for state and local goverm-ent
workers of 5.4%.
Based on this information and of other local wage adjustments
for 1987 (examples: Hutchinson Hospital 3.5%, Hutchinson
Utilities union workers - 3.58) it is recommended that the
City Council consider a general adjustment to all employees
of 3.5%, effective with the adoption of the new pay plan on
January 1, 1987.
The 1987 cost of such an adjustment would be $69,056 (all enployees),
with General Fund being $58,053 of this amount.
q F.
Bureau of Labor Statistics
historical cont
c
Technical' (202) 523 1913
Media contact: (202)
United States
Department
of Labor.
Washington,
Fm gB,FF.SE:
10:00 A.Mc}fir 28.
T.
Tuesday
1986
SSS 1986
EMPLO,,Kas COST LIIDEX _ the 3 months elAed in
reported
t Irij. IECi) greased 1=1 Percent'of Labor Statistics repo
t Cos t of Labothe _Ir 3.6 parcent. Zt» 1981=
T pry1986. the U�n�p for6,00mP�aa elude , salarbased On JW0 ies.
today. For the year l stood . 133. t cn costs, seasonally adjusted-
Sep
djusted.
Sep�m�r 1986 SCI �es c in f�sa It is not seasonal period was
1 red
and�l�rlcosts for emplolrpe bei ITICreage in tirn costs In mea This s1v and
�
e te
1.1 pe ] percentgain inthe am period 7 rcenC: t�-1Cai ntrated ��i
bald++ thet1O
conoe
for both private t workers (2.8 Perc�t�tworkers are ty rily,wpr]cers are more
cost al es9s forrnnen state and 1v for privateindustry
t� -Septet thrwghWt the year- wed in Sept r
dispel was
widely tion costs for the Year rate of increa9e
in oompensa earlier.. A low 4.7 percprit) and
reale a downfrcm
rclt inc t gain Year t,
1986 3w below the 4.9 Pew inalastrY workers 13.2 dawn from 6.0 PerO�t)
� for prrrWnt kers (5.2 percent.
state ******#****#***********4mates *of****quarterly
**
for the firs s and salaries only, for #
*#**#***##*****#***#*****
orkers In
* This release Pres't�� costs, and for hospital t*
* change in cclp Data are Provided tate and local g�r�n .
* workers in hose and in the private Federal quern- *
Mals.
5 are Part of t ice-Pcin9
* private ��. T p -se erielst. ams tor sures of err
Zcvp * � effort to stfor the fust tine are #
* mental arra for workers in
tries. Also ocupations
k�t on cost change for sales
* wholesale trade• ased ui fixed employment
*e 1986, F7CI measures are rather than from the
ch
# inning ink 1980 Census °f �lation period March 19 to recap- ! •
The
* is from ECI estimates f ing the 198��nstusweights- ide a one -Year
* 1986 were recal�1970 Cens"s' ���,ailable �n1970 and 198x0weights-
.
we ghts.
ch
* culaticnior Eci estimates based on
* overlap
*
0
la and
below the ss5 .0ala;rs alone tree 3.5 Percent over the
Percent gain a Year earlier, hreear Bdin September 1986,
andilocal 9vvennent workers (5.4 percent) than for Private industry workers
Percent), who make up a great majority of employees
The 3.1 percent a Liwu by the acI.
private Indus pay increase was the love _
dus try workers since this ISI ter P3Y gain recorded for
try series with record low wage and sal Jan inses 1976. other private . -
wor(2- Peercent), rketis blue-collar workers 2.3 percent), reincluded whi twor�llar
(both 3.1 percent), union goods-rsroducint and service -producing industries
(3.4 percent). percent), and nom3nion workers
Asamelthough the September 1985-86 pay increases in private industry averaged
gains declined morreuingsingids-pro8ucin9 industries (3.1 the
September 1985, when the dramatically the former oompared with the
��t)� d i
gains were 5.3 and 4.1 percent, Year ended in
Pay increases for nonunion workers (3,4 respectively.
(2.3 percent) during percent) exceeded those for rasion workers
producin �9 the September 1985-86 period. psis relationship goods- g industries (3.8 percent held in
service -producing industries (3.1 and 2.7� with 1.9 percent), as well as in
�'rt, respectively). (See table 6.)
ECI data for December 1986 will be released on Tuesday, January 27, 1987,
at 10:00 a.m. E.S.T.
ECI news releases for the remlinde
schedule: r of 1987 will be published acs the following
WRefetenoe Ibnth
!latch 1987
June 1987
September 1987
Release Gate
April 2 , 987
July 28, 1987
October 27, 1987
Pr
S1
SATION
Employment Cost Index by occupation and industry group
seasonally adjusted)
Series 1
opt. I
Jun:
opSept.
Jun!
ep .
Sept.
June
Sept. I
198S
191
1985 1
199
1
1985 1 1986 1
1986
lian workers .................................
128.4
131.5 1
133.0 1
1.6 1
0.7
1.1 1
I
4.9 4.0 1
i
3.6
Workers, by occupational group I
1
1
1
1
I
1
White-collar occupations ....................i
130.7 1
134.2
1
136.0 1
1.9 1
a 1
1.3
i 5.4 4.6
4.1
Blue-collar occupations .....................
124.4
126.8
127.8 I
1.1
1 .5 1
a
1 4.0 3.0 i
2.7
Service occupations .........................
130.9
133.7
1 135.4 t
1 t
2.3
1 .5 1
i i
1.3
( 5.1 1 4.5 1
I
3.4
Workers, by industry division
1
I
I
Goods -producing 1/ ..........................
124.9
128.1
128.8 (
8
1 .9
.5
1 4.0 3,4
3.1
Manufacturing .............................�
125.58
.7
i 129.3 1
.7
I .8
.5
( 4.2 3.3 1
3.0
Service -producing 2/ ........................
130.7
133.7
135.6 1
2.2
i .6
1.4
1 5.5 4.5
1 3.7
Services
136.4
139.4
142.4
I 2.9
I .4
2.2
1 5.9 5.1
4.4
..................................i
Health sarvices .........................
-
I
1 -
1 1.6
1.6
- 3.9c
3.8
Hospitals .............................
-
i r
I -
i -
-.7c
1.6
- 1 -
-
Public administration ....................�
134.2
i 138.0
i 140.6
i 3.0
I .9
1.9
5.8 1 5.9
(
4.8
1
Nonmanufacturingtt
............................:
129.7
� 132.8
134.6
i 2.0
1 .7
1.4
� 5.2 4.4
3.8
ivate industry workers .......................
126.8
120.9
�
1 130.8
1 1.3
a
.7
I 4.7 3.8
3.2
Workers, by occupational group
White -cellar occupations ....................
124.8
132.5
133.5
1.3
.9
.8
5.2 4.2
3.6
Blue-collar occupations ....................
124,0
126.3
127.2
}.0
.5
.7
3.9 2 9
2.6
Service occupations .........................
128.8
131.1
132.3
1.8
.2
.9
4.5 3.6
2.7
Workers, by industry division
1
Goods -producing 1/ .........................
124.6
127.8
128.6
.6
.9
.6
3.9 3.F
3.2
Service -producing Z/ ........................
128.7
131.6
1132.7
1.8
.6
.8
5.3 4.1
3.1
ate and local government workers ..............
136.5
139.7
143.6
3.4
.6
2.8.
6.0 3.3
( S•�
�.
Workors, by occupational group
Whits -collar occupations......... .....
137.6
140.5
145.0
35
.4
3.2
6.1 5.7
5.4
Blue-collar occupations .....................
131.9
136.3
138.5
2..6
1.2
1.6
1 5.5 ( 6.1
5.0
Workers, by industry division
i
1
Services .......... ............ ............�
137.9
140,8
1 145.5
1 3.5
.3
3.3
6.2 5.7
5.3
Hospitals and other services/..,........
134.1
137.9
139.4
2.0
.8
1.1
4.8 4.9
4.0
Health services .........................
2.7
1.0
1.5
- ( 5.1
3.9
Schools ................................
139.1
( 141.7
147.6
1 4.0
1 .1
4.2
6.3 t 6.0
6.1
mantary and secondary
140.9
f 143.2
149.4
I 4.7
1 .1
4.3
( 6.7 6.4
6.0
Pubiadministration ... :::::::::::::...
134.2
t 138.0
140.6
i 3.0
i .9
11 1.9
1 5.8 5.9
4.8
-.e.nl AabAe.
0
0
WAGES AND SALARIES
Table 2. Employment Cost Index for wages and salaries only, by occupation and industry group
(Not seasonally adjusted)
uata noc ava,aauae.
NOTE: See footnotes at end of tables.
I
Indexes
81=1
Percent_ChanQes for
(
i Months
nded
I 12 Months Indod
Series
Sept.
Juno
I Sept.
I Sept. June
Sept.
Sept.
June
I Sept.I
$6
1 86
1985
86
1986
985 198
1 1986
Civilian workers.................................1
126.3 1129.3
1 130.7
I
1 1.7
I
1 0.8
I
1.1
1 5.0 1 4.1
I 1
3.5
1
Workers, by occupational group
I =
I
I
I
I 1
I
White-collar occupations ..................
128.8 i
132.4
1134.1
I 1.9
.9
1.3
5.4 1 4.7
4.1
Blue-collar occupations ...................
122.0
1 124.1
125.0
1 1.2
I .6
.7
4,3 1 3.0
2.5
Service occupations .........................
128.0
1 130.0
131.7
2.2
`` .2
I 1.3
I 4.7 I 3.8
2.9
Workers, by industry division
Goods -producing J/ ..........................1
122.5
1 125.6
1 126.3
1 .8
1.0
1 .6
4.2 1 3.4
3.1
Manufacturing
123.2
1 126.5
1 127.2
.7
1.0
1 .6
4.4 3.4
3.2
.............................
Servico-producing 2/
128.6
131.5
133.4
2.2
.6
1.4
I 5.4 4.5
3.7
........................
Services ..................................
134.2
137.0
139.9
2.8
.4
2.1
5.5 5.0
4.2
Health services .........................
-
-
-
1.4
.7
1.7
- 3.4
3.7
Hospitals............................
_
_
_
-
-
1.6
1 - -
-
Public administration ....................
131.4
134.6
1137.5
1132.2
i 3.3
I .6
2.2
i 5.6 I 5.8
4.6
Nonmanufacturing ............................�
127.6
130.4
2.1
.6
1.4
i 5.2 4.3
3.6
Private industry workers .......................1
124.9
127.9
128.8
1 1.3
.9
.7
1!�
4.8 1 3.7
(3./�
Workers, by occupational group
{
1
White-collar occupations ....................
127.3
1131.1
132.0
1.4
1,2
.T
( 5.3 ( 4.5
3.7
Blue-collar occupations ....................
121.7
1123.7
124.5
1.2
I .5
.6
I 4.3 2.8
2.3
Service occupations .........................
126.3
1128.0
128.9
1.5
1 .0
.7
I 4.2 2.9
X2.1
Workers, by industry division
I
I
Goods -producing 1/ ..........................
122.3
{ 125.4
126.1
{ .7
1.0
.6
1 4.1 3.3
3.1
Service -Producing 2/ ........................
127.0
i 129.9
130.9
1 1.8
.7
I .8
5.3 4.1
3.1
State and local government workers ..............
133.2
{
1 136,0
1 140.4
1
1 3.5
1 .4
3.2
I 5.6 5.7
5.4
Workers. by occupational group
White-collar occupations ....................
134,3
1137.0
1 141.8
3.6
1 .3
{ 3.5
' 5.7 5.7
6-N
Blue-collar occupations .....................)
127.9
131.9
1 134.5
2.7
1.2
2.0
1 4.9 5.9
5.2
Workers, by industry division
tt
Services ....................................
134.5
137.1
1 142.1
3.7
1.2
3.6
I 5.7 1 5.7
5.7
Hospitals and other services ,J/...........
130.2
133.3
135.8
1.1
1 .7
1.9
1 4.1 41
4.3
Health services .........................
-
-
-
2.6
i .7
2.2 1
- 4..3
3.9
Schools ...................................
135.8
138.2
1 144.1
4.31
.1
4.3 1
6.3 6.1
6.1
Elementary and secondary ................
137.5
139.4
1 145.7
4.9
.
1 0
4.5 1
6.3 6.3 I
6,0
Public administration ......................
131.4
134.6
137.5
3.3
I .6 1
2.2 I
5.6 5.8
4.6
uata noc ava,aauae.
NOTE: See footnotes at end of tables.
I
COMPENSATION
Table 3. Employment Cost Index, private industry workers, by occupation and industry group
(Not seasonally adjusted)
noc avaase.
NOT Seo footnotes at end of tables.
Indexes (Juno 198
-
n n o
Series
1 ",
I
on
s Ended
1 M nded
Sept.
Jun: -I Sopt.
I-Sopt. I Juno
Sept.
I SM. I Juno I
Sept. I
1 198
86
98
8
Private industry workers .........................
126.8
1 129.9 1
130.8 1
1.3 I
0.8 1 0.7
4.7 3.8
3.2
Excluding sales .............................1
127.1
1 130.0
1 131.0 1
1.3
.7 .8
4.4 3.6
3.1
Workers, by occupational group
I I
I i
I
i
II
I
White-collar occupations ......................
128.8
II 132.5
( 133.5
1 1.3 I
9 .8
5.2 4.2
( 3.6
Excluding sales.......... ..
1129.8
133.4
1134.3 1
1.3 I
.9 .7 I
4.7 4.1
3.5
Professional specialty and technical ........
I -
-
I -
-
I .7 1 1.0
t - -
-
Executive, administrative, and managerial ...
I -
-
I -
- I
1.1 I .5
Sales.......... ....................�
-
-
- I
- I
1.2 I .6
- -
-
Administrative support, including elericel..
-
t
-
-
I -
I •8 1 .7
- -
-
Blue-collar occupations .......................1
124.0
1 126.3
1 127.2
1 1.0
1 .5 .7
3.9 2.9
2.6
Procision production, craft, and repair.....
-
-
.5 .7
- -
-
Mac hino operators, assemblers,
I
and inspectors ............................
-
( -
-
.5 .6
- -
-
Transportation and material moving..........
-
1 -
-
-
.7 f 1.1
- -
-
Handlers, equipment cleaners,
I
I
I
helpers, and laborers ...................
-
-
I -
I -
.3 .6
- -
-
Service occupations ...........................
128.8
131.1
1
1 132.3
I
1 1.8
I
1 .2 I .9
4.5 3.6
2.7
Workers, by industry division
i
Goods -producing I/ ............................
124.6
127.8
� 128.6
� 6
.9 .6
� 3.9 3.2
3.2
Construction ...............................
-
-
-
.7
1.6 .7
- 3.3
3.3
Manufacturing ..............................
125.5
128.7
1129.3
.8 .5
4.2 3.3
3.4
Durablos.................................
-
-
f
-.7
.5 .5
- -
-
Nondurables .................... ...........
-
-
I -
-
1 1.3 .6
- -
-
Service -producing 2/ ..........................
128.7
131.6
I
1132.7
1.8
1
1 .6 .8
5.3 4.1
3.1
Transportation and public utilities.........
-
I -
I -
I 1.4
1 .2 .6
- 3.4
2.5
Transportation ............................
-
-
1 -
i 1.4
1 -.2 .8
1 - 3.2
2.6
Public utilities ..........................I
-
-
I
II 1.7
.5 .5
I - 3.4
2.2
Wholesale and retail trade................::1
f 1.2
.9 .6
1 - 3.4
2.6
Wholesale trade ........................
.
_
II
_
1
_
(
1.1 .5
I - -
-
Retail trade .................. ............I
-
I -
1 -
!! 1.6
I .8 .6
- 3.6
2.7
Finance, insurance, and
real estate ..............................�_
I -
II 1.9
1 .8 .6
I - 5.3
3.9
Services ....................................
I '-
_
2.3
I .6 1.2
I - I 4.7
1 3.6
Health services ...........................1
-
I -
I -
I 1.2
I .5 1 1.7
I - 3.3
3.9
Hospitals...............................�
-
i -
i -
i -
II - i 1.6
i - -
-
Nonmanufacturing ..............................�
127.6
130.6
1 131.7
1 1.6
+ .7 1 .8
I
1 4.9 I 4.0
1 3.2
noc avaase.
NOT Seo footnotes at end of tables.
WAGES AND SALARIES
Table 4. Employment Cost Index for wages and salaries only, private industry workers, by occupation and
industry group
(Not seasonally adjusted)
- uaia noz ava a a0ie.
NOTE: See footnotes at end of tables.
n
0
*n e f
Serias
n e
Mo
I Sept.
Juno 5ep .
I opt. June
ep .
I
Sept. I
Jun*
I Sept.
9
98
1 5
86 98
1986
Private industryworkers
124.9
127.9
1128.8
I 1.3
1 0.9 0.7
1 4.8 I 3.7
( 3.1
Excluding sales ........... .................1
125.5
128.2
i 129.1
i 1.3 i
.7 I .7
i 4.6 i 3.5
I 2.9
II
Workers, by occupational group !
I
( I
I I
White-collar occupations ......................
127.3
131.1
1 132.0
1.4
1 1.2 1 •7
1 5.3 1 4.S
I 3.7
Excluding sales ...........................
128.8
1132.4
1133.3
I 1.3
I 1.0 .7
4.8 I 4.2
1 3.5
Professional specialty and technical........
131.2 1134.0
1135.4
I 1.9 I
1.0 1.0
4.8 I 4.1
1 5.5 4.4
3.2
3.7
Executive, administrative, and managerial...)
127.7 1132.1
1132.4
I .9
1 1.2 1 .2
Sales.......................................1
119.3
1124.3
125.2
I 1.6
1 1.6 I .7
1 8.0 5.9
4.9
Administrative support, Including clerical..
127.1
i 130.8
i 131.7
1 1.2
I 9 1 7
1 4.2 1 4.1
1 3.6
Blue-collar occupations .......................I
121.7
i 123.7
1 124.5
1 1.2
1 .5 1 .6
1 4.3 1 2.8
2.3
Precision production, craft, and repair.....
123.7
125.7
1126.7
I 1.4 1
.3 I .8I
4.8 I 3.0
2.4
Machine operators, assemblers.
I
I
and Inspectors ............... ............�
121.1
123.6
1124.1
8
I .8 4
( 3.9 2.9
2.5
Transportation and material moving..........
117.7
118.9
1 119.8
1.7
I .8 .8
I 3.8 2.8
1.8
Handlers, equipment cleaners,
I
I
I
I
helpers, and laborers ....................
118.6
120.3
i 120.9
1 .1
1 .3 .5
1 3.4 1.5
1 1.9
Service occupations ...........................I
I
126.3
1128.0
i 128.9
i 1.5
i .0 i .7
i 4.2 2.9
I 2.1
Workers, by industry division
Goods -Producing 1�............................
122.3
1125.4
1 126.1
1 .7 1
1.0 1 .6
1 4.1 1 3.3
1 3.,1
Construction................................II
117.3
1119.8
f! 120.5
( .6
I 1.3 I .6
I 2.6 I 2.7
I 2.7
Manufacturing...............................I
123.2
1126.5
1127.2
I .7
I 1.0 I .6
I 4.4 I 3.4
I 3.2
Durables ..................................
122.7
1 125.8
1 126.4
1 .6
1 .8 1 .5
1 4.2 1 3.1
1 3.0
Nondurables ...............................
124.0
1127.9
1128.5
I 1.1
1 1.4 1 .5
4.6 I 4.3
II 3.6
Service -producing 2i ..........................
127.0
I
1129.9
I
1130.9
1.8 I
I
.7 .8
I
I 5.3 I 4.1
1
I 3.1
Transportation and public utilities.........
124.8
1 126.6
1127.3
I 1.6
I 2 .6
II 4.1 3.1
II 2.0
Transportation ............................
-
1 -
I
I 1.5
1 -.1 .6
I - 2.5
I 1.5
Public utilities ..........................
-
I
I
I 1.7
I .8 .4
I - 4.1
I 2.8
Wholesale and retail trade................::1
122.7
1 125.8
1 126.5
1 1.3
1 1.0 1 .6
1 5.3 1 3.9
1 3.1
Wholesale trade .........................
II 127.7
('131.2
1131.8
I .7
1 1.2 I .5
1 5.8 1 3.5
1 3.2
Retail trade ..............................
120.8
123.7
i 124.4
I 1.6
1 1.0 I .6
I 5.1 1 4.0
1 3.0
Finance, insurance, and
I
I
I I I
I I
real estate ............................
124.1
1128.0
129.0
1 2.0
1 1.1 .8 I
7.6 5.2 I
3.9
Sory ices..................................::�
133.9
1 136.9
138.2
2.2
I .5 .9 1
5.4 4.5 1
3.2
Health services .........................
-
I -
I -
1.0
I .8 I 1.6 I
- I 3.2 (
3.7
Hospitals...............................i
-
i -
I '
i - i
- i 1.3
-
Nonmanufacturing ..............................i
125.9
i 128.7
li 129.7
1 1.6
1 .8 1 .8 1
5.0 1 3.9 1
3.0
- uaia noz ava a a0ie.
NOTE: See footnotes at end of tables.
OMPENSATION
table 5. Employment Cost Index, private industry workers, by bargaining status, region, and area size
(Not seasonally adjusted)
Muir; Ino inoaxos Tor meso series aro not strictly comparable to mese Tor the aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
See footnotes at and of tables.
1]
0
Indgxqs (June
=1
r
Series
Sept.I
June
Sept. (
ept.
une
Sap .
Sept.
I June I
Sept.
Workers, by bargaining status
......
Union.....................................�
126.5
128.7
1129.4
0.8
0.2
0.5
( 3.2
2.5 (
2.3
Goods -producing 1/ ............................
124.6
126.7
127.3.6
j .2
.5
i 2.6
2.3
2.2
Service -producing 2/..........................tI
129.5
1 131.9
132.8
1 1.2 I
.2
.7
f 4.0
s $.0
2.5
Manufacturing .......... ......... ... ...........
I 125.0
1126.9
1 127.5
( .6 I
-.1 (
5
I 2.8
1 2.2
2.0
Nonmanufacturing .............................1
127.8
130.4
131.2
i .9
.5
.6
3.4
f 3.0
2.7
Nonunion ........................................
126.E
130.2
131.2
1.4
.9
.8
5.4
4.2
3.5
Goods -producing 1/ ............................
124.4
128.2
129.1
.7
1.2
.7
I 5.1
3.8
3.8
Service -producing j/ ..........................
128.3
131.4
132.5
2.0
.8
.8
( 5.7
4.5
3.3
Manufacturing .................. I..............
125.7
129.7
130.4
7
1 1.2
.5
5.4
3.9
3.7
Nonmanufacturing ..............................
127.3
130.4
1.8
.7
.9
5.5
4.2
3.4
Workars, by rogion
1131.6
I
I
Northeast .......................................
12a.a
L33.3
1134.2
1.4
1.3
.7
5.2
1 5.5
4.2
South ................... .. .. ................
126.5
1129.6
1.0
.7
.8
4.8
1 3.5
3.3
Midwest (formerly North Central) ................
124.2
126.2
127.3
1.2
.2
.9
3.8
i 2.9
2.5
Nest ................. I... ............ ...........
129.1
131.6
132.1
.9
.6
.4
5.4
2.9
2.3
Workers, by area size
1
i
Metropolitan areas .............................
127.3
130
131.4
1.3
i
.8
.7
= 4.8
1
3.8
3:2
Other areas ....................................
123.9
126..5 4
127.2
1.1
.7
.6
I 4.1
3.2
2.7
Muir; Ino inoaxos Tor meso series aro not strictly comparable to mese Tor the aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
See footnotes at and of tables.
1]
0
1]
WAGES AND SALARIES
Table 6. Employment Cost Index for wages and salaries only, private industry workers, by bargaining
status, region, and area size
(Not seasonally adjusted)
0
nuic; Me ,IGexeg Tor cnese series are not scriccay comparaoie mo Inose Tor ine aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
1/ Includes mining, construction, and manufacturing.
Z/ Includes transportation, public utilities, trade, finance, insurance, real estate, services,
and, where applicable, public administration in State and local governments.
•J/ Includes, for example, library, social, and health services,
n e,e (June 1
8= 0
r e
r
I
1 3 Months
1
Mohths_Ended
Series
I Sept.
June
I Sept.
154pt.I
JuneSept.
I
Sept. I
June
1 Sept.
11985
1
1986
1 1986 j
1985-
1 1986 -L
1986
11985
11986
t 1986
Workers, by bargaining status
I
I
I
I
I
�
I
I
�
I
I
I
Union...........................................I
124.1
1 126.1
1 126.9
1 0.9
1 0.4
1 0.6
1 3.6
I 2.5
I 2.3
Gcods-producing 1/ ............................
122.2
1124.1
1124.5
1 .7
I .6
I .3
1 3.5
1 2.3
1 1.9
Service -producing Z/..........................i
127.1
i 129.3
i 130.5
i 1.1
i .2
i .9
I 3.8
i 2.9
i 2.7
Manufacturing.................................I
122.8
1124.6
1125.0
1 .9
1 .3
1 .3
1 4.0
1 2.4
1 1.8
Nonmanufacturing ..............................I
125.3
i 127.4
i 128.5
I 1.0
I .4
1 .9
1 3.3
1 2.7
1 2.6
Nonunion ............................... .........�
125.2
128.5
1129.4
1.5
.9
.7
I 5.4
4.1
I 3.4
Goods -producing 1/ ..................••••••••••
122.3
126.1
1127.0
I .7
1.3
.7
I 4.6
3.9
3.8
Service -producing Z/ ..........................
126.9
1 129.9
1 130.8
1 2.0
1 .8
I .7
II
i 5.8
I 4.4
3.1
Manufacturing...........................
123.1
1 127.7
1 128.5
1 .7
1 1.3
1 .6
1 4.9
4.0
3.9
Nonmanufacturing ..............................
125.9
i 128.9
i 129.8
i 1.9
i .9
i .7
i 5.6
i 4.3
i 3.1
Workers, by region
I
I1I
Northeast.......................................I
126.8
1131.3
I
1132.3
I
I 1.8
I 1.6
I .8
1 5.2
I
1 5.4
1 4.3
South...........................................I
124.8
1127.8
i 128.8
I 1.1
I .8
1 .8
1 4.9
1 3.6 1
3.2
Midwest (formerly North Central)................I
122.5
1124.4
1125.3
I 1.2
1 .2
1 .7
1 4.0
1 2.7
1 2.3
West............................................I
126.6
128.9
1 129.3
1 1.2
1 .6
f .3
1 5.5
1 3.0
1 2.1
Workers, by area size
S
I
i
I
Metropolitan areas .............................
125.5
I
1128.5
I
1129.4
I
1 1.4
JfI
1 .9 I
7
5.0 I
3.8
3.1
Other areas ....................................
121.9
124.5
125.0
I 1.1
.7
.4
3.7
3.2
2.5
nuic; Me ,IGexeg Tor cnese series are not scriccay comparaoie mo Inose Tor ine aggregate,
occupation, and industry series. See explanatory note.
1/ Includes mining, construction, and manufacturing.
Z/ Includes transportation, public utilities, trade, finance, insurance, real estate, services,
and, where applicable, public administration in State and local governments.
•J/ Includes, for example, library, social, and health services,
9
The Employment Cost Index (1TI) is a measure of the change in the price of labor,
free from the influence of employment shifts among occupations and industries.
The DCI wage and salary series is limited to changes in wage and salary rates,
defined as the hourly straight -time wage rate or, for workers not paid on an hourly
basis, earnings divided by the corresponding hours. Straight -time wage and salary
rates are total earnings before payroll deductions, excluding premium pay for over-
time and for work on weekends and holidays, and shift differentials. Production
bonuses, incentive earnings, commission payments, and cost -of -living adjustments
are included in straight -time wage and salary rates.
The compensation series includes employer costs for employee benefits as well as
wages and salaries. Benefits covered by the DCI are: Paid leave (vacations, holi-
days, sick leave, and other leave); supplemental pay (premium pay for overtime,
shift differentials, and nonproduction bonuses); insurance benefits (life, health,
and sickness and accident); retirement and savings benefits (pension and other re-
tirement plans and savings and thrift plans); legally required benefits (social
security, railroad retirement and supplemental retirement, railroad unemployment
insurance, Federal and state unemployment insurance, workers' oampensation, and
other legally required benefits such as state temporary disability); and other
benefits (severance pay, supplemental unemployment plans, and merchandise discounts
in department stores).
The DCI provides data for both the private and -public 'sectors, which are published
separately and also combined as the total civilian economy. The private sector in-
cludes the total private economy, excluding farms and households. The public sector
covers state and local governments, but excludes the Federal government.
Each quarter, straight -time average hourly wage and salary rates and benefit cost
data (oents-per-hanr- orkmed) are collected from a probability sample of about
15,000 occupations within 2,600 sample establishments in private industry and about
3,500 occupations within 700 sample establishments in state and local governments.
Data are collected for the pay period including the 12th day of the survey months
of March, June, September, and December. ECI statistics are neither annualized nor
adjusted for seasonal influences.
The sample establishments are classified in industry categories based on the 1972
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC), as defined by the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget.
Within an establishment, specific job categories are selected to represent broader
occupational definitions. Beginning in June 1986, the jobs are classified according
to definitions used in the 1980 Census. Prior to June 1986, they were classified
according to the 1970 Census. The titles of the published 1970 and 1980 occupation
groups are listed below for comparison. Differences between the two classification
systems are slight, as indicated in the article "Introducing new weights for the
Employment Cost Index," in the June 1985 issue of the Monthly labor Review.
11
U
9
0
0
1970 Census Category
Managers and administrators
Professional and technical
workers
Sales workers
Clerical workers
Craft and kindred
workers
Operatives, except
transport
Transport equipment
operatives
Nonfarm laborers
Service workers
Fixed employment weights
indexes --civilian, private,
are also used to derive all
10
1980 Census Category
Executive, administrative, and
managerial occupations
Professional specialty and
technical occupations
eoccupationsAdministrative support
occupations, including
clerical
Precision production, craft,
and repair occupations
Machine operators, assemblers,
and inspectors
Transportation and material
moving occupations
Handlers, equipment cleaners,
helpers, and laborers
Service occupations
are used each quarter to calculate the most aggregate
and state and local governments. These fixed weights
of the industry and occupation series indexes.
For the series based on bargaining status, region, or area size, employment data
are not available from the Census. The employment weights are reallocated within
these series each quarter based on the current sample. 7he indexes for these
series, consequently, are not strictly comparable to those for the aggregate, in-
dustry, and occupation series. A fuller explanation of the calculation of index
numbers appears in an article, "Estimation procedures for the Employment Cost
Index," in the May 1982 issue of the Monthly labor Review.
More detailed information on the ECI is available in several articles and publica-
tions. 'These include a chapter in the BIS Handbook of Methods (Bulletin 2134-1),
,,The Employment Cost Index." 'neo articles also appeared in the Monthly labor
Review: "Employment Cost Index: a measure of change in the 'price of labor',"
July 1975; and "How benefits will be incorporated into the Employment Cost Index,"
January 1978. Reprints of these articles plus several other descriptive pieces
and a historical listing of ECI data are available upon request.
s
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Repair Seat on Grader
DECEMBER 9+ 1986
WATER AND SEWER FUND
Supplies
1,615.59
• *Commissioner of Revenue
October Sales Tax
$ 613.74
Davies Water Equipment
Repairs
185.77
Norwest Bank of Mlps.
Interest & Service Fee
1+847.70
Ron Pallansch
Supplies
30.00
Champion Auto Store
Anti -Freeze & Plugs
5.63
American Payment Center
Rental - 3 Months
55.00
Central Garage
November Repairs
325.77
Carr Flowers
Plant - H. Heinecke
8.95
Comm. of Revenue
November Sales Tax
409.20
Electric Motor Co.
New Motor
71.00
Family Rexall Drug
Office Supplies
25.49
Farm & Home
Nov. Invoices
36.10
Floor Care Supply
Operating Supplies
134.45
Flitzloff Hardware
Supplies
4.43
G & K Services
Uniform Rental
110.40
Hutch Coop
Gasoline
621.80
Hutchinson Telephone Co.
Telephone
228.15
Hutchinson Utilities
Electricity & Gas
79650.84
Hutchinson Wholesale Supply
Supplies
3.02
J.W. Hanson Construction Co.
Replace Sidewalk & Curb &
Gutter 828.75
County Market
Operating Supplies
27.39
Junker Sanitation
Refuse Charges
27.462.50
Juul Contracting Co.
Replace Hydrant+ curb stop
1+211.75
McLeod County San. Landfill
Dumping Charges
32.20
Nelco Chemical Co.
Supplies
2+845.80
• auade Electric
Supplies
103.98
Rutz Plumbing & Heating
Gas Valve
157.73
Sorenson Farm Supply
Filters
3.50
Water Products Co.
Supplies
553.96
5 45+595.00
•
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
Interiors Unlimited
Repair Seat on Grader
38.50
Paver, Calmenson & Co.
Supplies
1,615.59
Thell Track & Tractor
Repairs
412.00
Custom Products Co.
Wiper Motor
73.10
Brandon Tire Co.
Repairs
47.00
Farm & Home
Supplies
20.35
G.T.C. Auto Parts
Repair Parts & Supplies
529.80
Hutch Iron & Metal
Repairs
65.85
Hutch Wholesale Supply Co.
Nov. Invoices
191.83
Northern States Supply
Supplies
49.26
Plaza Hardware
Supplies
30.64
Plowman's Inc.
Repair Parts
55.80
Wigen Chevrolet
Repair Parts
17.00
$ 31146.72
I
I
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Page 2
• GENERAL FUND
DECEMBER 9+ 1986
*University of Minnesota
Field Trip $
31.00
*Commissioner of Revenue
October Sale Tax - Arena
188.47
*Dept. of Nat. Resources
Snowmobile Reg. Fees
62.00
*Dept. of Nat. Resources
ORV Reg. Fees
18.00
*Dept. of Nat. Resources
Snowmoblie Reg. Fees
44.00
Darrell Haugen
Refund of fees for Baskeball Officials
210.00
James Weckman
% of gas pumped - October
3.68
Comm. of Transportation
State Appraisers
487.86
Chuck's Floral & Gifts
Arrangement - Pankake Funeral
15.00
Crown Floral & Gifts
Plant - Funeral-Brede(Krueger)
17.50
HCVN - CH 10
Franchise Agreement
750.00
Kennedy Appliance Service
Repairs
42.99
Life -Lite Police Equipment
Supplies
44.70
M.A.D. House
Sample Copy - Drugs
2.00
MJ Elevator Inc.
Elevator Service
53.00
Mid -Central Inc.
Supplies
18.49
Nat'l Fire Protection Assn.
Freight & Handling
5.00
National Property Supply
Parking Violation Stickers
50.50
National Police Supply
Supplies
40.95
Stein Chemical Co.
Cleaning Supplies
35.50
U.S. Figure Skating Assn.
Badges
336.40
Douglas Meier
Snow Conference
7.95
Michael Monge
National Fire Class
65.06
James Marka
Seminar on Writing
10.20
Hutchinson Telephone Co.
Telephone Service
91.47
Deb Wagner
Instructor Fee
45.00
Hutch Bus Lines
Bus Rental
160.00
Martin Bahn
Refund - Vienna Choir Boys
40.00
Citizens Ins. Agency
Rental Refund
35.00
Midwest Video Plus
Movie Rental - White Christmas
19.95
Communication Auditors
Pager Repairs
70.16
Hutchinson Synder Drug
Film
6.29
McLeod Coop Power Assn.
November Electricity
299.38
Mid -Central Inc.
Supplies
55.90
Popp Electric
Repairs
15.14
Henrys Candy Co.
Supplies
1+283.47
Hutchinson Fire Department
Reimbursement
790.00
Hutch Iron & Metal
Supplies
6.00
Hutch Leader
Advertising
226.05
Hutchinson Plumbing & Htg.
Repair Part
4.00
Hutchinson Fire & Safety
Maintenance & Repairs
130.90
Hutchinson Wholesale & Supply
Supplies
18.00
Ink Spots
Ad - Typesetting
7.50
Jerabek Machine Shop
Repairs
9.00
County Market
Sept & Oct Invoices
31.45
Juul Contracting
Repair Storm Sewer & Manhole
19902.50
J.W. Hanson Construction
Repairs
19264.00
K -Mart
Trash Bags
1.99
• L & P Supply Co.
Repair Part
24.95
Lamberts Standard
Car Wash
2.00
Mankato Mobile Radio
Repair Radio
31.74
Mankato Business Products
Meter -Estimate
40.00
Midland Products Co.
Supplies
113.55
BOND FUNDS
BONDS OF 1986
Erickson & Templin
Juul Contracting
American Nat'l Bank of St. Paul
BONDS OF 1976
Norwest Bank of Minneapolis
•BONDS OF 1980
1st Bank of Minneapolis
DECEMBER 9+ 1986
Office Rental - Dec. 5
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Coffee - Police Dept.
Page 3
Basic Cable
GENERAL FUND (Continued)
•
116.95
Nov. Invoices
Midcontinent Theatre Co.
Mileage
McGarvey Coffee
Repairs
No. American Cable Systems
Supplies
Olson's Locksmith
Fuel Oil
Plaza Hardware
Supplies
Gary Plotz
Salt
Ruade Electric
APCO Training Course
Rockite Silo Co.
Telephone Service
Schmeling Oil Co.
Electricity & Gas
Shopko
Repairs
Tri -County Water Cond.
Film Finishing
Lori Adamietz
Dec. Compensation & Meetings
Hutchinson Telephone Co.
November Repair Jobs
Hutchinson Utilities Comm.
November Invoices
Brandon Tire
Boarding Fees
Brinkman Studio
December Office and Copier Rental
John Bernhagen
DL Fees
Central Garage
Softener Rental & Salt
Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Office Supplies
Crow River Vet. Clinic
November Invoices
Chamber of Commerce
November Invoices
Co. Treasurer
Parts
Culligan Water Conditioning
November Invoices
Family Rexall Drug
Uniform Rental
Farm & Home
Floor Care Supply Co.
Promotional Program
GTC Auto Parts
UPS Charges
Fitzloff Hardware
Gasoline
G & K Services
HAVTI
Hager Jewelry
Hutchinson Coop
BOND FUNDS
BONDS OF 1986
Erickson & Templin
Juul Contracting
American Nat'l Bank of St. Paul
BONDS OF 1976
Norwest Bank of Minneapolis
•BONDS OF 1980
1st Bank of Minneapolis
DECEMBER 9+ 1986
Office Rental - Dec. 5
350.00
Coffee - Police Dept.
64.80
Basic Cable
8.31
Repairs
116.95
Nov. Invoices
129.12
Mileage
49.20
Repairs
910.25
Supplies
9.00
Fuel Oil
19797.00
Supplies
49.32
Salt
18.60
APCO Training Course
16.86
Telephone Service
2+863.17
Electricity & Gas
13+554.37
Repairs
56.31
Film Finishing
4.95
Dec. Compensation & Meetings
1+716.55
November Repair Jobs
5+304.51
November Invoices
531.00
Boarding Fees
185.50
December Office and Copier Rental
159.87
DL Fees
66.50
Softener Rental & Salt
40.50
Office Supplies
71.60
November Invoices
155.02
November Invoices
230.96
Parts
17.98
November Invoices
288.88
Uniform Rental
426.11
Promotional Program
983.00
UPS Charges
3.13
Gasoline
39065.04
$42+510.00
Estimate No. 8 57779.30
Estimate No. 3 394%.50
Administration Fees 189.90
9.465.70
Interest 21027.25
Interest 10000.00
r]
•
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 99 1986
Page 4
BOND FUNDS
LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION FUND
Fitzloff Hardware Refrigerator 99.95
HOSPITAL BONDS OF 1977
1st Bank of St. Paul Interest & Service Fee 28,752.50
NURSING HOME BONDS OF 1968
American National Bank of St. Paul Principal & Interest 949542.00
1980 TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE
1984 Parking Improvement Bonds Resolution No. 8432 276+465.00
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
City of Hutchinson Salaries 4+395.28
D.O.E.R. Social Security Soc. Sec. & Medicare 285.30
P.E.R.A. Employer Contribution-PERA 167.31
Twin City Wine Co. Liquor 2+910.79
Griggs. Cooper & Co. Wine 2+808.63
Quality Wine & Spirits Liquor 19894.69
Ed Phillips & Sons Wine 2+965.97
15+427.97
0
•
•
November 25, 1986
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Mr. Gary Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Mr. Plotz:
C1' 32425zF2j�E
lg86
o
�.n.L By YVC/ ti
CO
C ��� £�2l11CL6gL9
Re: Reassignment of Construction Grant Projects
Due to a recent reorganization of the Water Quality Division, many
Construction Grants projects have been reassigned. In order to more
efficiently serve individual communities, in conjunction with addressing
statewide wastewater treatment needs, the Water Quality Technical Review
Section and the Construction Grants Section have been combined. The new
Section, Municipal Wastewater Treatment, consists of five units. Your
project has been assigned to Unit 1.
The following staff will be managing and reviewing your project.
Jeanne Eggleston, Grants Project Manager 296-7169
Gerald Canfield, Technical Review Engineer 296-7389
Nathan Cooley, Staff Environmental Planner 296-7219
Steven Stark, Soil Scientist/Hydrologist 296-7214
John Hensel, Unit Supervisor 296-7213
Please feel free to contact any of the staff with questions.
Sincerely,
LL6a/
Ke h H. Ness, Chief
Municipal Wastewater Treatment Section
Division of Water Quality
KHN:nmf
cc: Donohue and Associates, Inc.
Phone: 612/296-7201
520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer
•
•
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO
FROM
SUBJECT
Gary Plotz
Dean M. O'Borsky, Chief of Police
School Safety
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE December 4, 1986
Several weeks ago I discussed the matter of pedestrian safety around the
Elementary School with Larry Ladd. As a result of that conversation I assigned
an officer to specifically monitor that situation and be present as often as
possible when his duties so allowed. I also told the day supervisor to see
that it continued.
We will continue to provide as much visibility and assistance in that area
as we can.
DMO:neb
C124
TO: GARY PLOTZ NOVEMBER 24, 1986FROM: HUTCHI`iSON SAFETY COUNCIL
RE: SAFETY OF ELEMENTARY STUDENTS
It is the request of the Hutchinson Safety Council that the Hutchinson
Police Department provide daily surveillance of the 2nd Avenue SW and
Glen Street areas around the elementary school from the hours of 7:45 A.M.-
8:15 A.M., and from 3:00 P.M. — 3:30 P.M. whenever possible.
Our Council is continually receiving comments expressing concern for
the safety of our youngsters around the elementary school property.
The visibility of the Police, it is felt, would increase the safety
for the youngsters.
We hope that the City Council will concur with our request.
•
0
L]
•
FOR YOUR INFORMATION,
PIONEF.RLANO LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
November 10, 1986
Present: James Phalen, Graceville Representing:
Wayne Hebrink, Renville
Curtis Johnson, Appleton
Linda Ulrich, Renville
Le Roy Sanders, Willmar
Button Sandberg, Director
Katherine Matson, Associate Director
Dave Lauritsen, Montevideo
Absent: Jeanette Buchanan, Willmar
Lilah Buhr, Stewart
Howard Turck, Litchfield
Big Stone County
Kandiyohi County
Appleton
Renville
Willmar
Willmar
McLeod County
Meeker County
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Sanders. Phalen/
Hebrink moved and seconded acceptance of the minutes of October 13, 1986.
Carried. Johnson/Hebrink moved and seconded acceptance of the treasurer's
report. Carried.
Reports of Lirector and Associate Director:
1. In addition to the Director's printed report, Mr. Sundberg stated that one
of the Willmar custodians had had surgery and the job would be covered by a
part time employee.
2. The Public Library Newsletter, newspaper clippings and the monthly statis-
tics were passed around. K. Matson noted that October was the first month to
show a system wide decrease in circulation. However, the bookmobile statistics
for the third quarter were very good.
3. The construction/ remodeling work at the Raymond Library was progressing but
the December 1, 1986, completion date would not be met. Hebrink/Johnson moved
and seconded that the scretary write the contractor to encourage quick and
efficient completion of the Raymond Library. Carried.
4. K. Matson gave the executive committee a follow up report on the staff work-
shop held in Montevideo October 30, 1986. The next staff workshop will be
planned in the Spring of 1987.
Ulrich/Phalen moved and seconded to direct the secretary to send a thank you
letter to recognize the efforts of the "Meeker County Citizens for Library
Services" group. Carried.
Hebrink/Johnson moved and seconded payment of bills. Carried.
Committee and Project Reports:
1. The Legislative Breakfasts will be held November 15 in Hutchinson and
November 22 in Montevideo. Board members were encouraged to contact legis-
lators and attend a breakfast. Folders of information about the Pioneerland
system will be sent to all legislators.
2. Automation Update --Laser quest equipment ordered by B. Boese has arrived.
B. Boese came back to help set up the system. Ulrich/Phalen moved and seconded
to direct Mr. Sundberg to purchase another CD from a McLoud County bank.
(Sundberg should check for the highest interest and federally insured CD when
selecting a bank.) The application for a Brehmer Grant was turned down. The
application to the McKnight Foundation is still in progress. The Automation
Committee may meet again before the end of 1986.
Communications:
1. Mr. Sundberg reported that other regions are hearing from county commis-
sioners concerning the Maintenance of Effort question. Minnesota Systems .
Directors will meet in December and these concerns will be discussed; however,
any changes still requires action by legislators.
2. Letters have been sent out regarding December 31, 1986, expiration of terms
for 11 of the board members. All board members are eligible for reappointment.
3. Copies of the revised 1987 Operational budget, newly revised Agreement
and comments from attorney, Mr. Gustafson, were sent out to 20 governing units.
Governing units are requested to approve the agreement by December 31, 1986,
or notify the System in writing of any reason for disapproval.
New Business:
1. Chairman Sanders directed Mr. Sundberg to call a meeting of the Personnel
Committee for November 18, 1986, at a location to be decided at a later date.
The committee will review the steps in the current salary schedule in light of
the revised 1987 budget.
2. The Sammie Director has notified Pioneerland Library System of the expired
terms of Barker and Boehlke to the Sammie Board and requests their reappoint-
ment. Chairman Sanders reappointed both to the Sammie Board.
The Executive Board will meet December 8, 1986 in lieu of the full board.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m.
•
Linda Ulrich
Hutchinson Community Development Corporation
Board of Director's Meeting
• November 4, 1986 - 7:00 p.m.
Chad Piehl's residence
M I N U T E S
Directors present:
Art Cooper, Chair
Ron McGraw
Tom Daggett
Glenn Matejka
Don Glas
Chad Piehl
Others present:
John Bernhagen, Exec. Director
Gary Blythe, Chamber Exec. Vice Pre:
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Cooper at 7:00 p.m.
Motion by Piehl, seconded by Clas, to approve the minutes of the October 1, 1986
meeting. Carried.
The treasurer's report was accepted as reported.
Discussion followed concerning the standing committees. Four committees will be
used for the year. They will be called: Business Location & Contact Committee,
• Public Information Committee, Finance Committee, and Greater Hutchinson Retail
Committee. Motion by McGraw, seconded by Piehl, to accept the committee re-
organization and to have the Chairman contact the suggested additional names .
for committee members. Carried.
Motion by Piehl, seconded by McGraw, to change By-law 2 to read as follows:
MEMBERS: Membership in the corporation shall be appointment of a majority
of the Board of Directors and shall number no less than five (5) nor more
than (A (40). Membership shall terminate upon the death or resignation
of the member. Each member is entitled to one vote. There is no personal
liability on members.
Carried.
Motion by McGraw, seconded by Glas, to approve the ten items on the 1987 One -Year
Work Plan as presented by Daggett and Piehl. Carried.
Motion by Piehl, seconded by McGraw, to approve the Five -Year Plan as presented
by Cooper and Bernhagen. Carried.
Bernhagen reported on:
-The progress of revising the video tape and the'fact booklet.
-Several businesses have contacted our community regarding location here.
•A presentation will be made before the Planning Commission regarding a
sign on the corner of Michigan Avenue and State Highway 7 i..entifying
the Industrial Park East.
•
-Additional targeted marketing letters have been sent and the follow ups
are in progress.
The next Board of Directors meeting will be at 7:00 p.m. at New Dimension Plating,
Inc., on December 3, 1986.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
--r--�+ �:..
•
2000 First Bank Place West
Minneapolis
Minnesota 55402
Telephone (612) 333-0543
Telecopier 1612) 333-0540
Clayton L. LeFevere
Herbert P. Lefler
J. Dennis O'Brien
John E. Drawn
David J. Kennedy
Joseph E. Hamilton
John B. Dean
Glenn E. Purdue
Richard J. Schaeffer
Charles L. LeFevere
Herbert P. Lefler III
James J. Thomson, Jr.
Thomas R. Galt
Davie Nolan
Brian F. Rice
John G. Kressel
WWM. Strommen
H. Batty
m bar P. Jordan
Kurt J. Erickson '
William R. Skallerud
Rodney D. Anderson
Corrine A. Heine
David D. Beaudoin
Paul E. Rasmussen
Steven M. Tallen
Mary F. Skala
Christopher J. Harristhal
Timothy J. Pawlenty
Rolf A. Sponheim
0
LeFevere
Lefler
Kennedy
O'Brien &
Drawn
A Pm4rremal
November 26, 1986
Mr. Paul Ackland
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Re: Classification of Accountants' Report
Dear Mr. Ackland:
DEC 1
RECUVL
6►., ,
You have asked our office to advise you as to whether a
certain accountants' report, prepared -for the City of
Hutchinson by Charles Bailly & Company, Certified Public
Accountants, may be released to a newspaper. We have
reviewed that report, entitled City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota Accountants' Report on Services Performed in
Connection With Police Department Funds Engagement
1983-85 (the "Bailly Report"), as well as the applicable
state statutes. Based upon that review and upon the
facts recited below, it is our opinion that the report
may be released to the newspaper only if one of the
following conditions exists:
(1) The City receives a written consent to such a
release, signed by Dean O'Borsky or
(2) the newspaper obtains a valid court order
requiring the release.
Facts
It is our understanding that the city council requested
that Charles Bailly & Company conduct a special audit of
the City's Police Department Funds for the years 1983 to
1985. The council requested the audit because it sus-
pected the police chief, Dean O'Borsky, of possible
mismanagement of funds or misconduct. We also understand
that, in connection with the O'Borsky investigation, the
city council has held at least one closed meeting and
that the city attorney advised the city council that the
meeting could be closed under the attorney-client
Mr. Paul Ackland .
November 26, 1986
Page 2
privilege exception to the Open Meeting Law. A local
newspaper has asked that you release the Bailly report to
it.
Classification
The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the "Act")
governs the collection, use, and storage of data by a
government entity. See Minn. Stat. 513.01, et seg.
Under the Act, data is divided into two categories: data
on individuals and data not on individuals. Data on
individuals includes all data in which any individual is
or can be identified as the subject of that data, unless
the appearance of the name or other identifying data can
be clearly demonstrated to be only incidental to the data
and the data are not accessed by the name or other
identifying data of any individual. Minn. Stat. 513.02,
subd. 5. Although generally an audit of a city's finan-
cial records would not be considered data on individuals, •
the Bailly report appears to fall within that category.
The Bailly report makes repeated reference to Chief
O'Borsky and his explanations regarding the police
department records. There is no clear demonstration that
the appearance of his name is only incidental to the
data. Further, it is our understanding that the Bailly
report is accessed by Chief O'Borsky's name, because it
was requested in connection with an investigation into
his job performance. Thus, the Bailly report is data on
individuals.
The Act further divides data on individuals into three
classifications: public, private, and confidential.
Minn. Stat. 513.02, Subds. 3, 12, 15. All data on
individuals is presumed to be public unless otherwise
classified by state statute or federal law. Minn. Stat.
513.03, subd. 1. Our review of the report and the
relevant statutes indicates that the Bailly report may be
classified as confidential under Minn. Stat. 513.39, as
civil investigative data, and as private under 513.43, as
personnel data.
Section 13.39 provides that data collected by a Sovern-
ment entity as part of an active investigation undertaken
to commence or defend a pending civil legal action is
confidential. Whether a civil legal action is pending
must be determined by the chief attorney acting for the
government entity. A pending civil legal action includes
iMr. Paul Ackland
November 26, 1986
Page 3
judicial, administrative, or arbitration proceedings.
The Bailly report falls within the statute because it was
requested as part of an active investigation into possi-
ble misconduct by Chief O'Borsky. Your city attorney has
already determined that a civil legal action is pending
in connection with this matter, for it was on that basis
that the city council conducted its closed meeting.
The Bailly report also falls within 513.43. That section
governs personnel data, i.e., data collected "because the
individual is or was an employee" of the government
entity. Although §13.43 classifies certain types of data
as public, none of those exceptions is involved here.
All other personnel data is private. Minn. Stat. §13.43,
subd. 4. The Bailly report was collected as part of an
investigation into the job performance of Chief O'Borsky,
a City employee, and disciplinary action is possible.
• Therefore, the Bailly report is private personnel data
under the Act.
Ability to Release
The classification of data under the Act determines
whether and to whom the data may be released. In gener-
al, confidential data on individuals may not be released
to either the public or the subject individual. Minn.
Stat. §§13.02, subd. 3, 13.05, Subd. 4. Private data on
individuals is generally accessible to the subject
individual but not to the public, unless the subject
consents to the release. Minn. Stat. §13.02, subd. 12.
As stated above, the Bailly report may be classified as
both confidential and private data on individuals. In
such a case, the Act provides that the data is private.
Minn. Stat. §13.03, subd. 4. Therefore, the Bailly
report may be released to the subject of that report,
Dean O'Borsky.
As for release to the newspaper, the general answer is
that the data may not be released to a member of the
public unless Dean O'Borsky consents in writing, in a
form that complies with §13.05, subd. 4. Both §§13.39
and 13.43 add other provisions, however, that may allow
release under other circumstances. Section 13.39 pro-
vides that active civil investigative data may be made
accessible to any person, agency or the public if the
government entity determines that such access "will aid
the law enforcement process, promote public health or
0
Mr. Paul
Ackland
November 26,
Page 4
11 Minn.
unrest- t
read rumor or 13.43 1,,,vides
that
safety or
dispel bdlde2p SectioY leased Pursuant t May
may be ther the City
data - not clear wrie tion created in
Stat. §13eTsonnel It excep required
private P t order. ort under the order as one
valid tour a court and the
the Bailly tPobtaininq roach, its
release conservative approach, desires
§13.39 without e any release
is to require anyone
in §13.43. The mor making
here, order before13.39.
reCommended a court exception
in §
to obtain under the as
release even advise you
to the Public, letter t ht be released.
in an opinion e ort mig
possible cate P application
It is not ere its of
e
to all circumstances `^e mPli d, and circumstane fore
Act is
fairlyrticular facts should then
City of the
The
The
requuee% eme tcautdata..
ona in Max
vi 1 any tion of release
esatory and
exercise ext, A release in on for comp the•
report. to an
action In additionf for a
Bailly the City Minn. StaAct may be Prosweu reec
ect end
subJ lacy damages' the §13.09. report you
exemP who violates Stat.
Minn• of the ,,illy
individual offense. release
misdemeanor making any
that before further' inion, please
consult with us regarding
this oP
If you have any questions
o contact me.
do not hesitate t
Sincerely Yours'
Dayle Nolan
DNskk
0
.CURTISM. BRADFORD
DANK PROCHNOW
BRADFORD & PROCHNOW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
I2b NORTH FRANKLIN STREET - RIVERSIDE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
December 8, 1986
Mr. James Schaefer
Attorn"y at Law
105 — 2nd Ave. SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Maplewood Academy
Dear Mr. Schaefer:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TELEPHONE:
(612) 647.2720
DEC 1986
Bye V,Fp
In response to your letter of December 3, 1986
enclosed please find a copy of a December 16, 1985 letter
of Marlow Priebe concerning his investigation of the
drainage line of Maplewood Academy. Also, you will find
a partial copy of the Preliminary Engineering Report on
County ditch 18 commissioned by the County Board. Clearly
it reflects that Lateral #1 has been intercepted by the
City storm sewer.
The law concerning abrogation or abandonment of
County ditches, laterals or lines is statutory. I refer
you to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 106.
It is irrelevant whether any easements are filed
of record concerning these drainage lines. You have
indicated that they have been in existence for some 74
years. Certainly, this amount of time would constitute
a prescriptive easement.
£Z
I urge you to recommend that the Council reconsider
its position. Kindly advise me as to the City's final
position within two weeks.
Very truly yours,
I 15 F & PRO
CHNOW
Proc--
DKP:cab
Enclosure
cc: vCity Counsel
/ (612) 587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
December 16, 1965
Lyndon G. Furst, Ed. Dir.
Principal
Maplewood Academy
700 No. Main St.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Maplewood Acedemy
Drainage Problem
Dear Mr. Furst:
We have completed our field investigation relative to \
g your drainage problem
and found the following:
1. The line is open under the highway.
2. The line was located on the east side of the highway and found
to be on the south side of Ninth Avenue.
Before construction would begin in the spring, we feel the County should be
contacted, since you were connected to Lateral No. 1_of County Ditch No.
18 at one time. It will have to become a three-way of
on cost
before we begin.
I will keep you informed on this matter as it progresses. I expect I will
have more information in about 30 days.
Respectfully,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Marlow V. Priebe
Director of Engineering
MVP/pv
cc: Marilyn
0
r1
U
The overall purpose of this engineering report on County Ditch No. 18
Is to provide the McLeod County Board of Commissioners and the City of
Hutchinson with the pertinent drainage Information to determine the
current condition of the ditch and recommend alternative solutions to
the current problem.
I�
2. Comput r Mod iInn
The existing and proposed capacities of the ditch were determined
using the
computer model STORM, Storm Drain Analysis, WIIIdan
Engineering, March, 1983.
STORM is a storm drain analysis program which calculates the hydraulic
grade line for a storm drain system given the physical characteristics
of an existing or proposed system.
7]�
The flow In the system can be either pressure flow or open channel
flow and the sections may be either circular or rectangular.
Junctions
_]
are analyzed using the principle of pressure plus momentum.
The program locates
points In the system where the flow goes from
—
partial to full and locates the position of any hydraulic Jump. The
program has capabilities for analyzing not only the main line but also
the laterals and catch basln connector pipes.
nn 3. Exlsting Conditions
:f
County Ditch No. 18 is a the drainage system constructed In 1912 to
provide drainage of agricultural land north of the City of Hutchinson.
Since the time County Ditch No. 18 was originally built, the City of
Hutchinson has been expanding and is now using the system for
residential and street drainage. Commercial and Industrial sites have
i been developed in the area and depend on County Ditch No. 18 for
drainage. Future residential construction which will add drainage to
the system, is already planned. Based on landowner complaints,
increasing maintenance costs and other observations, the existing
system appears to be in a badly deteriorated condition and is
providing unreliable drainage for the farmland it was originally
constructed to serve.
'= Flow from the upper portion of Lateral No. 1 has been intercepted by a
• City storm sewer. Now, only the lower 600 feet of the lateral
continues to be drained by the County Ditch.
-2- 8616-01
4. ifvdroinglcF_ iIEU= •
The County Ditch 18 system was modeled using four different scenarios.
First, the capacity of the In-place system was examined to determine
discharges and hydraulic grade lines. The results are summarized in
Table i. As can be seen, the capacity of the ditch above Lateral No.
1 is significantly reduced. The reduced capacity and flat energy
gradient in the section from Lateral No. 1 to Hutch Technologies would
make the lower levels of the hones in this area subject to potential
flooding from local inflows.
The second column of Table 1 shows the suggested capacity of the ditch
system if the modern-day design coefficients are used. Based on a
recommended drainag6 coefficient of 3/8 inch per acre per day, the
existing system seems to have from only 12 to 22$ of the recommended
capacity for agricultural drainage. This analysis assumed that all of
the drainage area is in agricultural production.
The third and fourth columsn of Table 1 demonstrate the effects of
urban and industrial drainage on the County Ditch. The third column
represents the flows which are trying to get into the existing system.
The fourth column represents the potential flows from a proposed urban
development in the City of Hutchinson. These discharges will be used
to develop the pipe sizes and slopes for the various alternatives to
be examined later.
-3- 8616-01
•
