Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp06-23-1987 cHUTCH INSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
June 21 TO June 27
WEDNESDAY
-24-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meet-
ing at City Hall
SUNDAY
-21-
FATHER'S DAY
WATER CARNIVAL PARADE
r
THURSDAY
-25-
5:30 P.M. - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
MONDAY
-22-
:00 P.M. - Open Bids at City
Hall for Demolition/
Removal of Structure
FRIDAY
-26-
TUEY
-23-
10:00 A.M. - Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant Staff
Meeting at Project
Site Office
7:30 P.M. - Charter Commission i
Meeting at Fire
Station
7:30 P.M. - City Council Meet-
ing at City Hall
SATURDAY
-27-
VACATION & CONFERENCE:
KEN MERRILL - June 22 -29
Vacation
DICK NAGY - June 24 -26
Water Operators
School
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 1987
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Lavern Johnson, Bethlehem United Methodist Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Bid Opening of May 26, 1987 and June 8, 1987;
Regular ee ing o-f June 8, 1987 and Special Meeting of June 15, 1987
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - May 1987
2. Planning Commission Minutes of May 19, 1987
3. Nursing Hone Board Minutes of May 21, 1987
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed
. 5. Public Hearin - 8_00 P.M.
(a) Roll No. 226 - Project No. 87 -01, Letting No. 1
(HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 8, 1987)
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
project and adopt roll and award contract for improvement - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution
(b) Assessment Roll No. 233 - Project No. 87 -35
(Supplemental Agreement to Letting No. 2, Project No. 87 -09)
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject Motion to approve
supplemental agreement and adopt roll - Motion to waive readings and
adopt Resolutions No. 8554 and No. 8559
(c) Improvement Project No. 87 -36, Letting No. 16
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
project, plans and specifications and set bid date - Motion to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 8555 and No. 8556
6. Communications, Requests and Petitions
(a) Consideration of Insurance Renewals With Presentation By American Risk
• Services and Insurance Planners Representatives
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve renewals
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 23, 1987
7. Resolutions and Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 8560 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Continuation of Board of Review from June 17, 1987
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to
authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Amendment of Portable Sign Ordinance with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive first reading
of ordinance and set second reading July 14, 1987
(c) Consideration of Rezoning from R -5 to R -2 In Fifth Addition to Lakewood 40 Terrace Submitted By Staff with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive first reading
of ordinance and set second reading July 14, 1987
(d) Consideration of Variance Submitted By William Backen of Farm & Home
Distributing with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution
(e) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By Andrew Ross with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution
(f) Consideration of Final Plat of Fifth Addition To Lakewood Terrace
Submitted By Loretta McDonald And Street Name Change with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive reading and
adopt Resolution
•
Q
•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 23, 1987
(g) Consideration of Lot Split of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Rolling Oaks Fifth
Addition Requested By John Miller with Favorable Recommendation of
Planning Commission
Action- Motion to reject - Motion to approve lot split
(h) Consideration of Revised Sketch Plan Submitted By Roger Siemsen Within
Two Mile Radius
Action - Refer to County with no objection
(i) Consideration of Purchasing Xerox Printing Machine for Engineering
Department
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve purchase
(j) Consideration to Confine City Utility Easement
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and vacate excess
easement
(k) Consideration of Escrow Agreement with Robert L. Carr Co.
. Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement
(1) Consideration of Second Quarter Merit Adjustment And Pay Grade
Classification Change
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve recommendations
(m) Consideration of Setting Interest Rate for 1987 Assessment Rolls
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve interest rate - Motion to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8561
(n) Consideration of Establishing Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 15,
Assessment Roll No. 234
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll and set hearing for
July 14, 1987 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to-waive readings and adopt
Resolutions No. 8557 & No. 8558
(o) Consideration of Authorizing Hutchinson Community Hospital To Expand
Offices On Lower Level
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve expansion
(p) Consideration of Purchasing Five Critical Care Beds for Hutchinson
• Community Hospital
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve purchase
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 23, 1987
(q) Consideration of Replacing Incinerator for Hutchinson Community
Hospital
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve replacement
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations and Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate
funds
12. Adjournment
4
•
0
u
•
•
MINUTES
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, MAY 26, 1987
The bid opening was called to order by City Administrator Plotz at 2:00 P.M.
Present were: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Finance Director Kenneth B.
Merrill, Bond Consultant Bill Fahey, and Administrative Secretary Marilyn
Swanson.
The publication notice of bond sale for $5,975,000 General Obligation Waste-
water Treatment Bonds of 1987 was read. The following bids were opened:
Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc.
Cronin & Company, Inc.
First Bank Minneapolis
Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
Prudential -Bache Securities, Inc.
TOTAL INTEREST
NET INTEREST
COST
RATE
$4,494,465.76
7.1397
4,659,455.75
7.4018
4,494,425.00
7.1396
4,543,175.75
7.2171
4,471,923.75
7.1039
4,509,480.75
7.1635
The publication notice of bond sale for $1,200,000 General Obligation Improve-
ment Bonds of 1987 was read. The following bids were opened:
Clayton Brown & Associates, Inc.
Cronin & Company, Inc.
First Bank Minneapolis
Harris Trust & Savings Bank
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
Prudential -Bache Securities, Inc.
TOTAL INTEREST NET INTEREST
COST RATE
$556,117.50 6.70021
573,971.00 6.9153
550,100.00 6.6277
560,786.50 6.7564
551,970.25 6.6502
556,833.00 6.7088
The bids were referred to the bond consultant for review and recommendation to
the City Council meeting this evening.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 2:15 P.M.
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1987
The bid opening was called to order by Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill at
2:00 P.M. Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 3698, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 15,
Project No. 87 -33 & 87 -34, was dispensed with. The following bid was opened:
Juul Contracting
Hutchinson, MN
$89,894.75
The bid was referred to the City Engineer for review.
The meeting adjourned at 2:03 P.M.
�i '
•
11
•
MINUTES
• REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JUNE 8, 1987
1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow-
ing were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, John Mlinar,
and Pat Mikulecky. Absent: Alderman Marlin Torgerson. Also present: City
Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering Eugene Anderson and
City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of May 26, 1987 were approved as dis-
tributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - MAY 1987
• (b) GAMBLING LICENSE FOR AMERICAN LEGION AUXILLIARY AND HUTCH HOCKEY
ASSOCIATION AT PETER'S BY THE PARK
(c) NON- INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR TOURNAMENTS JUNE 19 -21 AND
JULY 11 -12 BY SPANKY'S
(d) USE OF FIREMAN'S PARK FOR MUSIC CONCERT ON JUNE 20, 1987
(e) DANCE PERMIT FOR FARM 8 HOME 25TH ANNIVERSARY ON AUGUST 14, 1987
(f) APPOINTMENT TO HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL:
1. BARBARA BONNIWELL
2. BRENDA MAIERS
The motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar, to order
the report filed, issue the license and permit, approve the concert and
ratify the appointments, with the exclusion of item (c) on the list. Motion
unanimously carried.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) ROLL NO. 226 - PROJECT NO. 87 -01, LETTING NO. 1
(HEARING CONTINUED FROM MAY 12, 1987)
• Mayor Ackland reopened the continued hearing at 8:00 P.M. He stated
the affected property owners were in favor of the project; however, no
one wanted to be assessed. He could not see the City doing the project
1
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1987
•
if it was not assessed.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar made the motion to continue the
hearing until the next meeting, pending hearing from property owners.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and carried unanimously.
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) DISCUSSION OF ASSESSMENT TO WALLY TEICH
Attorney Ronald McGraw represented Wally Teich regarding assessment to
property he formerly owned. Mr. Teich's position was that he overpaid
for a 1979 project assessment.
It was reported the City changed its policy on assessing corner lot
property in 1980 after the Teich assessment was done.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to defer to the June 23,
1987 meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously
carried.
(b) PRESENTATION BY SPANKY'S REGARDING INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
Mr. Pat May, representing Spanky's, reported that D'Vinci's restaurant •
closed on June 1 and broke its 10 -year lease with the owner of the
building. He then requested a two -week extension to June 19 for set-
ting up a menu to comply with the ordinance to sell food with a liquor
license.
It was the City Attorney's legal opinion that a two week delay would
present no problem, but the ordinance would have to be enforced. The
City Council concurred with the recommendation and no action was taken.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR STREET LIGHT ON CIRCLE DRIVE
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and refer the request to the Utilities
Commission. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously car-
ried.
(d) PRESENTATION BY CITY ATTORNEY ON STATUS OF AIRPORT APPRAISALS
Attorney Anderson reported he was still waiting to hear from the State
regarding the status of the airport appraisals. Alderman Carls moved
to defer until June 23, 1987. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and
carried unanimously.
(e) PRESENTATION BY CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS & MANAGEMENT INC. REGARDING
POLICE FACILITY
President Vergil Florhaug of CAM presented an update report on the •
status of the police facility project. He stated a letter of intent
2
�J
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1987
had been sent to the low bidders on the project notifying them a con-
tract would be forthcoming; however, the 30 day time limit has lapsed.
It was reported that Gopher State Contracting had withdrawn its bid but
would consider doing the project for a $10,000 increase in bid price.
Also, several contractors wished to raise their prices due to an omis-
sion in the bids.
Attorney Anderson commented on the issue of negotiating with the low
bidder. It was not necessary to reject the low bid to take the next
lowest bid as long as it is under the next low bidder.
Mr. Florhaug stated the Penske bid had been adjusted by changing the
prices on concrete in the wall.
There was discussion regarding the plans for the building and the two
versus four hour wall requirement. Building Official Marka stated he
had received a letter from the State Building Department accepting the
two hour wall, but it was not signed by the architect. The State made
an error, and the four hour wall is required according to State Build-
ing code.
Mr. Florhaug requested someone be put in charge of the project as a
contact person so he would not have to go through City Council meet-
ings on all items. He will have a report prepared by Friday concern-
ing budget revision and status of bidders.
Alderman Carls moved to schedule a special City Council meeting on Mon-
day, June 15, 1987 at 8:00 P.M. to review the reports submitted by CAM.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 8550 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
Alderman Carls moved to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8550.
Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PROHIBITING PARKING ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTH GRADE ROAD
FROM T.H. 15 TO MERRILL STREET (DEFERRED MAY 26, 1987)
Administrator Plotz reported he was waiting for a response from Jim
DeMeyer regarding this item. Alderman Carls moved to defer until a
future meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar ande carried unan-
imously.
9. NEW BUSINESS
• (a) CONSIDERATION OF ENERGY COUNCIL APPLICATION
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1987
0
Doug Jost and Glenn Matejka presented the application for a Community
Energy Council Grant covering a two year period. The City's local
match cost would be $1,800 the first year and $900 the second year.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded
by Alderman Mikulecky, to approve the grant application and waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 8553. Motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF GROVE STREET AND FOURTH AVENUE SURFACING
The City Engineer presented a report on the restoration of Second
Avenue. City cost for a two inch mat on Second Avenue would be $5,000.
He also gave four alternatives for street restoration on the relief
sewer project for Fourth Avenue Southwest to Grove Street.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve alternative No. 4
for Grove Street and Fourth Avenue Southwest for 1988. Motion seconded
by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF EASEMENT FOR PAMIDA PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED LEGAL FEES
The City Engineer reported the City needed easements from the Plaza 15
shopping center and the owner of the former Pamida property for the
service road along Highway 15 South. •
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to defer to the June 15,
1987 special Council meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and
carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF NORTH PARK TENNIS COURT LIGHTING WITH RECOMMENDATION
OF PARK & RECREATION BOARD
Director Bruce Ericson presented two options for lighting of the North
Park tennis courts. The Park & Recreation Board recommended option A,
to provide light fixtures and install on existing poles at a cost of
$5,600, with the money to come from the park dedication fund.
After discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to have the item of the ten-
nis court lighting put into the 1988 budget. Motion seconded by Alder-
man Carls and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF GRADE STATUS OF CIVIC ARENA /POOL MANAGER
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded
by Alderman Mlinar, to approve the reclassification to grade "F" for
the Civic Arena /Pool Manager. Motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF PROPERTY AT 325 ADAMS STREET SOUTH
Fire Marshal Field reported the owner of the property at 325 Adams •
Street South wanted to sell the house and property to the City for one
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1987
• dollar. It was his recommendation to purchase the property, demolish
the building(s) and sell the lot.
After discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to authorize purchase of the
property and to advertise for bids to demolish the structures. Motion
seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGES WITHIN ORGANIZATION CHART AND JOB DESCRIPTIONS
RELATING TO RETIREMENT OF DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls to approve
the organizational changes. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and
carried unanimously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL APPRECIATION PICNIC
City Attorney Anderson stated he was checking into the insurance rami-
fications of the City serving beer at the picnic.
The Council concurred to hold the annual appreciation picnic August 19
at the Civic Arena and cater the food as in the past.
RECESS: The Council adjourned for a 10 minute recess at 10:25 P.M.
• (i) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 87 -16, LETTING 11
City Engineer Anderson recommended awarding the contract for Project
No. 87 -16 to the only bidder, Juul Contracting Company, in the amount
of $16,055.80.
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Mlinar,
to approve and award the contract to Juul Contracting Company, to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 8551. Motion unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 87 -36
The City Engineer presented a report on the sanitary sewer and appur-
tenances improvement project at an estimated cost of $55,000.
Realtor Jim Fahey commented that the assessment search on property sold
on Oakwood Lane did not have complete information regarding the sani-
tary sewer, and as a consequence his business may be liable for the
additional cost involved. The City Attorney stated the responsibility
rested with the seller, and City staff should not be responsible for
recording certain information on the assessment search.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the engineer's
report, set a hearing for June 23, 1987 at 8:00 P.M., to waive reading
• and adopt Resolution No. 8549. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and
carried unanimously.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 8, 1987
0
(k) CONSIDERATION OF SANITARY SEWER ON GROVE STREET NORTH OF WASHINGTON
AVENUE
After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded
by Alderman Carls, to approve City control of the sanitary sewer and to
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 8552. Motion unanimously car-
ried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz stated Director Bruce Ericson had submitted a
report on the expenses and revenue for the concert held at the Civic
Arena. Also, the Finance Director had prepared a report on the three
property owners who received refund payments for meter over - charge on
water /sewer bills.
It was reported that Acting Police Chief Kirchoff had presented several
alternatives to resolve the parking problem at the high school. Atten-
tion was also directed to the memorandum from Engineer Gene Anderson
regarding the traffic control signal at the intersection of T.H. 7/22
and School Road.
The owner of the Sheep Shedde complained to the City Administrator
about the high rates for refuse hauling in Hutchinson compared to
Olivia and Willmar where he also owns restaurants.
Administrator Plotz stated he would have a report on goals and objec-
tives ready for the next meeting.
The EPA will be in Hutchinson for four days during July to conduct an
audit on the wastewater treatment plant files.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN PAT MIKULECKY
Alderman Mikulecky inquired about the status on parking assessments.
He was contacted by Russ Meade regarding this matter. Mr. Meade was
concerned about cars parked on the street in front of commercial busi-
nesses instead of in the city lot which does not allow over -night park-
ing.
11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, seconded by Alderman Carls,
to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Motion
unanimously carried. •
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:25 P.M.
6
MINUTES
• SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JUNE 15, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Paul Ackland at
8:00 p.m. Present in addition to Mayor Ackland were Aldermen Mike Carla,
John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky, City Attorney Barry
Anderson and City Administrator Gary Plotz.
2. REPORT BY VIRGIL FLORHAUG. Mr. Florhaug of CAM provided the council
with an updated report on the status of bids. Some changes are still
being negotiated and not all bidders have turned in contracts. It is
hoped that all signed contracts will be in the hands of CAM by June 23.
The council still needs to authorize CAM to send out contracts to
Pinske's and Star Iron. Total cost at this time is projected at
$765,588, which includes the change to a 4 -hour fire wall. Mr. Florhaug
hopes that actual construction can begin by July 1. A site superintendent
has not yet been retained, but several have been interviewed, and it is
likely that Tom Christensen may be selected.
After discussion, motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to authorize CAM
to accept the Pinske and Star Iron bids. Seconded by Alderman Carls, the
motion carried unanimously.
After discussion, motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to authorize the
• Mayor and City Administrator to sign all contracts. Seconded by Alderman
Carla, the motion carried unanimously.
3. EASEMENT FOR FORMER PAMIDA PROPERTY. City Attorney Anderson reported
that Pamida has dropped its request for reimbursement from the city, with
the stipulation that they be assured no assessments are being planned.
The Attorney will send a letter to that effect.
4. EASEMENT ON DEFOREST WAGNER PROPERTY. Director of Engineering Eugene
Anderson provided communication to the council stating that Mr. Wagner
requests reimbursement for any damage to his crops from 1987
construction of sewer lines. Easement for construction would be obtained
based on this consideration.
Motion was made by Alderman Torgerson authorizing Director of Engineering
to proceed to negotiate to obtain easement for construction through the
Wagner property. Motion was seconded by Alderman Carla and carried
unanimously.
5. ADJOURNMENT. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
r1
LJ
G'C
r
MAY
EVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
TAXES
LICENSES
PERMITS AND FEES
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FINES & FORFEITS
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
ELECTIONS
FINANCE
MOTOR VEHICLE
ASSESSING
LEGAL
PLANNING
ITY HALL
CREATION BUILDING
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
CIVIL DEFENSE
SAFETY COUNCIL
FIRE MARSHALL
ENGINEERING
STREETS & ALLEYS
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
LIBRARY
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
PARK .'REC. ADMIN.
RECREATION
CIVIC ARENA
PARK DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEBT SERVICE
AIRP =RT
TRANSIT
COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
UNALLOCATED
ISOTAL
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1987
MAY
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
MAY
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
375000.00
382334.48
1314700.00
932365.52
0.29
69.00
11314.00
16950.00
5636.00
0.67
19246.47
42901.62
66900.00
23998.38
0.64
0.00
21986.00
1087494.00
1065508.00
0.02
71620.54
188217.38
508144.00
319926.62
0.37
3027.99
15560.31
29600.00
14039.69
0.53
14140.58
57104.68
131800.00
74695.32
0.43
0.00
77500.00
429000.00
351500.00
0.18
1722.24
1910.I5
500.00
- 1410.15
3.82
464826.82 798828.62 3585088.00 2786259.38 0.22
1978.46
14163.92
31467.00
17303.08
0.45
10736.30
55460.46
133954.00
78493.54
0.41
0.00
0.00
4850.00
4850.00
0.00
14578.19
72121.79
197268.00
225146.21
0.37
4978.26
30306.94
66037.00
35730.06
0.46
0.00
0.00
19700.00
19700.00
0.00
6222.41
33170.66
32807.00
- 3633.66
1.01
205.00
10706.81
11375.00
668.19
0.94
2265.35
1437''3.02
40083.00
25709.98
0.36
2991.68
15487.05
66470.00
50982.95
0.23
50457.42
349718.19
741043.00
391324.81
0.47
30006.71
54604.12
91585.00
36980.88
0.60
2189.62
13530.01
37650.00-
24119.99
0.36
6121.54
33601.64
81346.00
47744.36
0.41
0.00
0.00
825.00
825.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
150.00
150.00
0.00
3216.89
16884.08
41023.00
24138.92
0.41
14803.54
76762.00
192643.00
115881.00
0.40
26869.74
120658.45
359103.00
238444.55
0.34
4611.12
24655.38
70700.00
46044.62
0.35
1124.93
30071.94
64696.00
34624.06
0.46
16270.53
33485.06
53690.00
20204:94
0.62
6979.20
35019.36
87392.00
52372.64
0.40
4695.51
32609.10
128122.00
95512.90
0.25
5625.56
57152.92
114172.00
57019.08
0.50
26630.59
122570.94
362092.00
239521.06
0.34
7122.41
17476.71
43790.00
26311.29
0.30
2275.93
i3026.99
33150.00
20123.01
0.39
8500.00
14500.00
50396.00
35896.00
0.29
14354.56
33220.46
50572.00
17351.54
0.66
5304.07
31265.89
121734.00
.90468.11
0.26
586.71
5739.31
0.00
- 5739.31
1548.89
68270.83
255203.00
186932.17
0.27
265331.141430616.03 35850BB.00 2154471.97 0.40
4 - �?, (I)
MAY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1987
MAY
82533.42
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
0.00
985.31
4800.00
REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
MONTH OF
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAir
27676.73
MAY
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
US
LIQUOR SALES
3344871.85
151399.93
3390000.00
238601.07
0.39
WINE SALES
11181.92
49221.29
135000.00
85776.71
0.36
BEER SALES
65159.96
237011.37
635000.00
397988.63
0.37
BEER DEPOSITS
-42.73
- 132.81
0.00
132.B1
6604.00
MISC. SALES
3955.44
14315.77
0.00
- 14315.77
1227514.00
INTEREST
442.75
1774.98
5200.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
- 391.90
- 1332.47
0.00
1332.47
TDTAL
114789.29
452257.06
1165200.00
712942.94
0.39
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
10844.25
59136.58
141670.00
82533.42
0.42
SUPPLIES. REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
0.00
985.31
4800.00
3814.69
0.21
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
3444.94
8163.27
35840.00
27676.73
0.23
MISCELLANEOUS
54.00
327.00
9100.00
8773.00
0.04
CAPITAL OUTLAY
823.30
823.30
42500.00
41676.70
0.00
TRANSFERS
0.00
0.00
110000.00
110000.00
0.00
COST OF SALES
90639.27
.350798.06
877000.00
526201.94
0.40
OTHER
0.00
6604.00
6604.00
0.00
IDTAL
105805.76
420233.52
1227514.00
807280.48
0.
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
7B50.00
0.00
- 7850.00
0.00
WATER SALES
37868.46
181803.03
460000.00
278196.97
0.40
WATER METER SALES
560.00
1850.00
7009.00
5150.00
0.26
REFUSE SERVICES
29714.90
136665.57
328000.00
191314.43
0.42
SEWER SERVICES
43862.99
222790.98
615000.00
392209.02
0.36
EPA SALES
37025.54
189869.78
450000.00
PENALTY CHARGES
742.97
4481.13
7000.00
2518.87
0.00
INTEREST EARNED
5663.53
16759.42
60000.00
43240.58
0.28
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
1268.00
2000.00
732.00
0.00
OTHER
83.23
938.34
150.00
- 788.34
6.26
TOTAL
155521.62
764296.25
1929150.00
1164853.75
0.40
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER/FUND
REFUSE
27521.65
137608.25
325000.00
187391.75
WATER
33931.64
213558.86
884040.00
670481.14
SEWER
43049.73
373577.73
688483.00
314905.27
TASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT.
889363.16
951553.95
0.00
- 951553.95
TOTAL 993866.18 1676298.79 1897523.00 221224.21
0.42
0.24
0.51
0.88
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, May 19, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Larry Romo at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Bruce Drahos, Spencer Beytien,
Roland Ebent, Marlin Torgerson, and Vice Chairman Larry Romo. Members
absent: Chairman Tom Lyke and Bill Craig. Also present: Building
Inspector, Jim Marka, City Administrator, Gary Plotz and City Engineer,
Eugene Anderson.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Beytien made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, April 21, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion
carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GARY MILLER
Vice Chairman Romo opened the hearing at 7:31 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3691 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
• Thursday, May 7, 1987. The request is for consi ering a conditional
use permit to allow Crow River Country Club to construct a 16' X 28'
addition to the kitchen on property located on Country Club Road.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Beytien the hearing closed at 7:35 pm. Mr. Ebent made a motion to
recommend approval to the City Council. Seconded by Mr.Torgerson
the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY GILBERT HAMMER
Vice Chairman Romo opened the hearing at 7.35 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3692 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, May 7, 1987. The request is for coning a conditional
use permit to allow the owner to remodel a dairy retail store into
living quarters for Vo -Tech students on property located on 106 Erie
Street.
Mr. Hammer was present to explain the use of the building and that
the property does conform with flood plain regulations.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Torgerson the
hearing closed at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend approval to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Drahos the
motion carried unanimously.
• (c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FIFTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE
SUBMITTED BY LORETTA ACDONALD
1 6C)
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
5/19/87
Vice Chairman Romo opened the hearing at 7:40 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3693 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, May 7, 1987. The request is for the purpose of
considering the platting of a parcel of property to be known as
Fifth Addition to Lakewood Terrace.
Mr. Romo read the memo from City Engineer Anderson regarding the
plat after which Engineer Anderson responded with favorable comment
on the plat. Building Official Marka explained staff recommendation
of the plat and how it fits into the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Beytien
the hearing closed at 7:43 p.m. Mr. Drahos made a motion to
recommend approval to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the
motion carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF PORTABLE SIGN ORDINANCE
Building Official Marka explained the ordinance and the procedure of
enforcement.
Mr. Torgerson lead discussion as to the cooperation of the community
businesses and the difficulty of enforcing such sign ordinances. .
After discussion Mr. Torgerson.moved to set the Public Hearing for
June 16, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the motion carried
unanimously. It was suggested to notify businesses with portable
signs 6f the hearing.
(b) DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REPORT - Chapters 4-7
Administrator Plotz suggested scheduling 2 firms to make
presentations at the next meeting so as to stay on the time line for
the budget review in August.
Mr. Romo recommended that the commission members continue to
familiarize themselves with the report.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY SUPER AMERICA FOR TIME EXTENSION OF
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE GRANTED 11/86
There was discussion of the service road and the accessability to
the business. Engineer Anderson explained the traffic problems that
could arise.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend a 6 month extension to City
Council. Seconded by Mr. Drahos the motion carried unanimously.
r�
U
q
MINUTES - HUTCHNISON PLANNING COMMISSION
5/19/87
5. NEW BUSINESS
• (a) DISCUSSION OF REZONING R -5 TO R -2 IN MCDONALDS LAKEVIEW ADDITION
Building Official Marka explained the staff recommendation of the
approval to rezone an area in McDonalds Lakeview Addition from R -5
to R -2. Administrator Plotz noted the reasons for R -2 zoning and
the aesthetics of the area.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval to set a Public
Hearing on the rezoning. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY ALFRED KOGLIN (two -mile
radius)
Mr. Koglin explained the plan and his willingness to work with the
city and township as to the roadway. There was discussion on the
cul -de -sac with consensus by the commission that possibly a
horseshoe access would be more easily maintained. Mr. Koglin noted
the unusual property lines making it difficult to cone up with a
solution on the roadway, although he would be reviewing the
sketch again in order to find an agreeable change.
Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend approval of the sketch plan
provided that Mr. Koglin change the road in order that it can be
is maintained by the Township. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the motion
carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY SIEMSEN /LARAWAY (two -
mile radius)
1]
Mr. Romo commented on the denial of the sketch plan by the Acoma
Town Board. The plan was disapproved by the town board on the
grounds that agricultural land is not to be taken out of production
and platted.
Mr. Ebent moved to recommend denial of the sketch plan following the
recommendation of the Acoma Town Board. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the
motion carried unanimously.
(d) PRESENTATION BY TKDA INC. ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
There was no presentation at this time.
(e) CONSIDERATON OF FINAL PLAT OF SUNSET RIDGE ADDITION SUBMITTED BY KEVIN
COMPTON
Engineer Anderson noted the recommended changes in the final plat
on Lot 14 and the name change of Connecticut Court to Westwood Road.
3
MINUTES - HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
5/19/87
Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat to
City Council. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried
unanimously.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF RENTER'S FACT SHEET
Building Official Marka commented on the distribution of the fact
sheet and that there was no response by the community thus far. He
noted that Hutchinson is not ready for licensing at present but the
City should educate the public with handouts.
There was d?iscussion on using portions of the fact sheet as public
information in the local newspaper.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no futher business the meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm.
•
•
4
� r q
BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME
Minutes - May - 1987
• The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing
Home met Thursday, May 21, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. in the Annex Day
Room. President Larry Graf presiding.
Members present: Larry Graf Jim Mills
Ancher Nelsen David Jensen
Gloria Dansereau Marge Putney
Mavis Geier
Members absent: Esther Kuehl John Mlinar
Guests: Larry Jacobson - Accountant of the Charles
Baily & Company, Certified Public Accountants.
Bonnie Nelson - Student, Mankato State Uni-
versity.
MINUTES OF PAST MEETING:
A motion was made by Marge Putney and seconded by Jim Mills
to approve the minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:
A motion was made by Gloria Dansereau and seconded by
Ancher Nelsen to approve for payment the attached listing of
accounts in the amount of $41,668.90. All in favor. Motion
• carried.
FINANCIAL REPORT:
Larry Jacobson, accountant of the Charles Baily & Company,
Certified Public Accountants, reported on the 1986 audit. The
audit showed that Burns Manor is financially healthy. A question
and answer period followed. David Jensen, financial advisor,
discussed the April financial statement and the 1987 budget. The
occupancy rate determines profit or loss. Most of the expenses
are fixed and are not adjustable.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Air Conditioners: The City Council approved the additional
$300.00 per air conditioning unit. Excerpts of City Council
minutes, dated April 28, 1987 and May 12, 1987 are incorporated
with the Burns Manor minutes of the April 23, 1987 meeting.
B. Moratorium: A letter was written to Sandra Gardebring,
State of Minnesota Department of Human Services stating the
• improvements needed at Burns Manor and inquiring how to accom-
plish it within the confines of the moratorium.
C. Tom Hindle Lawsuit: Mrs. Geier has not been advised of
any new developments in the lawsuit. !� /\
May Minutes
Page 2
OLD BUSINESS CONTINUED:
D. Nursing Assistant Class: Six nursing assistants attended •
the "Building Self Esteem" class at Willmar.
E. Cable T.V.: A discussion was held by the board voicing
the concerns of the V.F.W. and the American Legion representatives
not being able to contact the administrator. A letter of apology
will be written to the organizations. A date for a meeting with
the Commanders will be requested.
F. Policy Concerning Employee Telephone Calls: The Burns
Manor Employee Policy states that use of the telephone for
personal reasons, other than for an emergency will result in
disciplinary measures, including dismissal. Excessive abuse
of the phone has resulted in administrative regulations con-
cerning emergency use of the phone for all employee calls.
This has resulted in complaints from employees and people wishing
to contact Burns Manor employees.
Discussion: The Burns Manor telephone policy shall
remain the same. Only emergency calls are to received or made •
by employees.
NEW BUSINESS
A. State Activity Convention: The State Activity Convention
will be held in Duluth. Two Burns Manor employees will attend.
B. Nursing Assistants: Retaining nursing assistance has
been a problem. Employees do not show up for work or they work
a few days and leave. This has resulted in a shortage of nursing
assistants. The employment rate in Hutchinson is 4.4% which
accounts for the few amount of applicants applying for work.
C. Food Costs: Food costs will increase due to a State order
for all nursing homes to increase the meat portion an additional
one ounce for all residents.
D. Resignation: Esther Kuehl has resigned from the Board
for health reasons. The Mayor was informed of her resignation.
is
May Minutes
Page 3
• Patient Satisfaction forms were available.
There being no further business, President Larry Graf
adjourned the meeting.
The Burns Manor Board of.Directors will meet Thursday,
June 25, 1987 at 5:30 p.m. in the Annex Day Room.
ATTEST:
•
Larry Graf, President
•
Respectfully submitted:
av 1s J. G er; Secretary
r'
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON THURSDAY,
APRIL 23RD, 1987.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
• PUBLICATION NO. 3683
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 226
Letting No. 1, Project No. 87 -01
Hutchinson, Minnesota
April 213t, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given, that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. . on the
12th dam of May, 1987, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at Hutchinson.
Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment against affected property for
the improvement of Roberts First Addition and Berm on South Side of Roberts
First and Second Additions by construction of Storm Sewer and Appurtenances.
You may, at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the
County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk. No interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid by September 30th, 1987. You may, at
anytime thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or
interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you
• decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of
interest that will apply is 7 percent per year. The right to partially prepay
the assessment shall be until September 30th, 1987.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is PLAN l -
$45,163.15, PLAN B - $40,857.88, or PLAN C - $26,323.97. Written or oral
objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to
the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with
the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the
hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the
amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such
further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the
following procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may
testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of
exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will
be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with
each witness until neither side has further questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call
• witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same
procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed
with the objector's witnesses.
5
""CATION N0. 3683
` !(tom 2
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however,
they may be considered and awed to the Council as to the weight of
items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a
final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law.
No new evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or Clerk.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in
its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has
been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed
property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted
under it, may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to •
the City Clerk for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this
special assessment on his property.
XA 4'-kx
Gary D. Plo City AdmWni3trator
Hutchinson, Minnesota
•
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 226
• Resolution No. 8517
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of Roberts First Addition and Berm on South
Side of Roberts First and Second Additions by construction of Storm Sewer and
Appurtenances,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1988, and shall bear
interest at the rate of _ percent per annum as set doom by the adoption of
this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from October 1, 1987, until the 31st day of December,
• 1988. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for
one year on all unpaid installments.
•
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1987; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October
10, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding
year.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the
County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this day of .Tune, 1987.
Mayor
City Clerk -- j
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 1 •
PROJECT N0. 87 -01
Resolution No. 8522
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Roberts First Addition and Berm on South Side of Roberts First and Second
Additions by the construction of Storm Sewer and Appurtenances, bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
Juul Contracting Company $389822.25 - A
$359293.35 - B
$239380.30 - C
Quam Construction $41,663.50 - A
$38,393.10 - B
$25,774.30 - C
Hjerpe Corporation $61,980.00 - A
$59,969.00 - B
$43,408.00 - C
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Juul Contracting Co. of Hutchinson, MN, is •
the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached contract with Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson, MN, in the
name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement of Roberts First Addition
and Berm on South Side of Roberts First and Second Additions by the
construction of Storm Sewer and Appurtenances - Plan _, according to the
plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of
the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a
contract has been signed.
Adopted by the City Council this day of June, 1987.
Mayor
City Clerk
•
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY,
JUNE 9TH, 19879 AND ON TUESDAY, JUNE 16TH, 1987.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
• PUBLICATION NO. 3699
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 233
Project No. 87 -35 - Supp. ARmt. Project 87 -09
Hutchinson, Minnesota
May 26th, 1987
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given, that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. . on the
23rd day of June, 1987, in the Council Chambers of City Hall at Hutchinson,
Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment against affected property for
the improvement of Hilltop Lane and Campbell Lane in Woodridge Addition by the
construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances.
You may, at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the
County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Clerk. No interest shall be
charged if the entire assessment is paid by September 30th, 1987. You may, at
anytime thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or
interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you
• decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of
interest that will apply is 7 percent per year. The right to partially prepay
the assessment shall be until September 30th, 1987.
The proposed. assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Clerk's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
$9,540.36.Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No
appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written
objection is filed with the Clerk prior to the hearing or presented to the
presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider
any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an
adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as
it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the
following procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may
testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of
exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will
be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with
each witness until neither side has further questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call
witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same
• procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed
with the objector's witnesses.
PUBLICATION NO. 3699
PAGE 2
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, 40
they may be considered and agrued to the Council as to the weight of
items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a
final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law.
No new evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or Clerk.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.1959 the Council may, in
its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead
property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a
hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has
been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed
property owner meeting the requirements of this law and the resolution adopted
under it, may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to
the City Clerk for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this •
special assessment on his property.
Gary D. Plot , Cilty inistrator
Hutchinson, Minnesota
•
a
CTTY OF HIIPCf1INS0N, MINNESOTA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
{
Supp, to Contract No. 1
No. 87 -09
Sheet 1 OT 2
F r ractor Fe . roject State roject City Pro ect
W Hanson Construction Co. 7' ess P.O. Box 353, 1040 Hwy. 22 So. Location Hilltop Lane and Campbell Lane in
Hutchinson MN 55350 Woodridge Addition
This contract is amended as follows:
WHEREAS, this contact calls for, among other things, the construction of concrete
curb and gutter, aggregate base and appurtenances, with pertinent pay items therefore; and
WHEREAS, at the request of adjacent property owners, the City wishes to construct a
permanent street surface; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer has determined that bituminous pavement be constructed,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS SO MUTUALLY AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD:
1. That the Contractor shall prepare the aggregate base and construct bituminous
surfacing on Hilltop Lane and on CaWbell Lane in Woodridge Addition, in the following
thicknesses:
2 -1/4" of MN /DOT 2331 Bituminous Base Course
3/4" of MN /DOT 2361 Asphaltic Concrete Surface (Fine Mix)
and as directed by the Engineer.
is 2. That the construction shall be in accordance with the applicable provisions of
the contract specifications and with Sections 2112, 2331 and 2361 of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" 1983 Edition,
and supplemental specifications thereto.
3. The unit of measure for the extra work, all as provided by the Contractor,
shall be by the ton for 2331 and 2361 bituminous mixtures, by each for casting
adjustments and by the road station for subgrade preparation, as provided in the
Estimate of Cost herinafter.
4. The negotiated unit price for the extra work specified herein at $21.00 per
ton for 2331 bituminous base course mixture, $34.00 per ton for 2361 asphaltic
concrete mixture, $150.00 per each for adjusting manhole casting, and $100.00 per
road station for subgrade preparation.
S. Contract time will not be revised except as may be provided under the
provisions of NN /DOT Specification 1806.
Dated: , 19
or
Dated: , 19_
Dated: , 19 0
Dated: 19-81 AA AA� �C/•
City Adm istra r
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTN
SUPPLEXENTAL AGREEMENT
Supp. to Contract No. 1
No.
-97 VT
Sheet 2
F EFe . Project State Project City Project
on Construction Co. NA NA 87 -09
. Box 353, 1040 Hwy. 22 So. Location Hilltop Lane and Campbell Lane in
chinson, MN 55350 Wood-ridge Addition
This contract is amended as follows:
6. The Contractor will not make claim of any kind or character what -so -ever, for any
other costs or expenses which he may have incurred or which may be hereafter incurred in
performing the work or furnishing the materials required by this agreement.
ESTIMATE OF COST
DECREASE ITEMS
ITEM Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
Adjust Manhole Casting 5 EACH $ 100.00 $ 500.00
Class 5 Aggregate Base 190 C.Y. 7.00 1,330.00
TOTALDECREASE--------------------------------- ----- ------ ---- ---- -- - - - - -- $ 1,830.00
INCREASE ITEMS
Bituminous Material 2331 Base 24Q TON $ 21.00 $ 5,040. Off
Bituminous Material 2361 Wear 100 TON 34.00 3,400.00
Adjust Manhole Casting 5 EACH 150.00 750.00
Subgrade Preparation 4.6 RD.STA. 100.00 460.00
TOTALINCREASE--------------------------------- --- ----- ------------- - - ---- $ 9,650.00
NETINCREASE------------------------------- ---- ---- --------- -- --- --- - - - - -- $ 7,820.00
Original Contract Amount
$62,094.20
Dated:
, 19_
Director
Engi eering
Original Contract Date
�/of
4,_
May 26 1987
Dated:
, 19
c<
ctor
�
Dated:
19f �
�� -P
//C �1
Mayor
Dated:
19 r7
Ci y Admin
tra or
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 233
Project No. 87 -35
Supplemental Agreement to Letting No. 2, Project 87 -09
• Resolution No. 8554
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of Hilltop Lane and Campbell Lane in Woodridge
Addition by the construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1988, and shall bear
interest at the rate of 7 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of
this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from October 19 1987, until the 31st day of December,
1988. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for
• one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1987; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October
10, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding
year.
4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of
the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same
manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
•
City Administrator
Mayor
RESOLUTION APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
PROJECT NO. 87 -35
Supp. Agmt. to Letting No. 2, Project No. 87 -09 •
Resolution No. 8559
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on May 26th,
1987, negotiations for a Supplemental Agreement for the improvement of Hilltop
Lane and Campbell Lane in Woodridge Addition by the construction of Bituminous
Suracing and Appurtenances, have been completed and presented to the Council
for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHNSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
the attached Supplemental Agreement with J. W. Hanson Construction Company of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the
improvement of Hilltop Lane and Campbell Lane in Woodridge Addition by the
construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
City Administrator
Mayor •
•
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 11th, 1987, and on
Thursday, June 18th, 1987.
•
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT N0. 87 -36
PUBLICATION N0. 3707
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 P.M. on the 23rd
day of June, 1987, to consider the making of an improvement on the Easterly
Side of Golf Course Road (C.S.A.H. 12) from 300 Feet South of County Road 76
to Oakwood Lane by the construction of Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area
proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefited property. The
estimated cost of such improvement is $559000.00. Such persons as desire to
be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this
meeting.
City A&lAnistrkor
Dated: June 8th,`1987
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
40
June 18, 1987
Mayor Paul Ackland
City of Hutchinson
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Acklund:
Thank you for informing us of the Public Hearing
on Tuesday, June 23rd regarding the sanitary
sewer connection to Oakwood Lane. We are unable
to attend the public hearing; nevertheless we do
wish to express our opinion on the subject. You,
and the other city council members, should be
advised that, as residents of Oakwood Lane, we
want to be connected to the city sewer system.
Sincerely,
hn F. Bergers
1203 Oakwood L e
Hutchinson, MN 55350
'2 ill fi.
Ruth K. Berger n
ris19 2p 2
JUN 1987
RECEIVED
By— - - -�
2£Z
•
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
• LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 87 -36
Resolution No. 8555
WHEREAS, a Resolution of the City Council adopted the 8th day of June,
1987, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the proposed improvement of the
Easterly Side of Golf Course Road (C.S.A.H. 12) from 300 Feet South of County
Road 76 to Oakwood Lane by the construction of Sanitary Sewer and
Appurtenances,
AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly
publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon
on the 23rd day of June, 1987, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard thereon,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council
resolution adopted the 8th day of June, 1987.
2. Eugene Anderson is hereby designated as the engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
• improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
City Administrator
u
Mayor
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 87 -36
Resolution No. 8556
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on June 23rd,
1987, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of the Easterly Side of Golf Course Road (C.S.A.H. 12) from 300
Feet South of County Road 76 to Oakwood Lane by the construction of Sanitary
Sewer and Appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to
the council for approval;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for two weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be opened and considered by the City at 2:00 P.M. on July •
7th, 1987, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota,
and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the clerk for 10 per cent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
Mayor
City Administrator
F- I
L
I
* M
INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
City of Hutchinson
Property and Casualty Renewal Figures
City Public Official
Property & Liability
Airport
Is Liquor Liability
Police Professional
Auto
Umbrella, $1,000,000
Bond
Boiler & Machinery
Workers Comp
s
rouw�
%QWA6i �w l.M
1986 -1987
2,993
132,363
4,250
12,500
11,102
30,531
None
3,014
4,844
148,990
1987 -1988 Alternate
3,629 *21,062 League
136,742
5,500 Excluding leased
premises or cert.
of insurance
12,500
15,395 Included League
27,123
*45,000 City & Elec. Util.
See sheet attached
3,464 *2,542 Hartford
5,000 Deductible
4,844 *9,180
No final figures available yet,
however, a substantial rate
increase and change in experi-
ence modification plus increased
payrolls will result in at least
a 100,000 increase over last
year.
� A),
I0 p E 5 5 1 0 N r
NA
� NIE ,.Gtr
I 'M
INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
Public Official and Police Professional
We suggest that the City change the Public Official coverage and
the Police Professional coverage over to the League Program.
Renewal cost with current carrier:
$5,000 Deductible, Utility Public Official $ 2,900
$10,000 Deductible, City Public Official 3,629
$10,000 Deductible, Police Professional 15,395
$21,924
League Program $5,000 Deductible $21,062
includes Police, Public Official for City and Utilities.
4
•
I
p`EESSIpN,
or�N
s
f<.'P
I AM
INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
TO CHANGE PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY FROM CURRENT CARRIER TO
THE LEAGUE PROGRAM.
0
wuw�
AwEroMe• 4so �wr
EXTENDED REPORTING ENDORSEMENT
1 year
254
$1,373.00
2 year
504
$2,746.00
3 year
754
$4,120.00
poFE sio �v�
AN ?
i lIA
SC RA Nt E A�'�
INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
Umbrella Liability
The actual Umbrella quote has not been received from the League
as of this date. The League's underwriter suggested that we use
the same quote as last year which was $45,000.
Since this contracts premium would be allocated by the cost of
the underlying insurance in the basic General Liability and
Auto Liability to the various City entities; the major portion
of the cost would fall on the Utilities Commission. We request
that the Council work through the Cities risk manager, with the
City administrator and with the Utility manager to make the
final determination on the procurement of this coverage and its
cost allocation.
Y10�
VOUR�
jlflMdKt. NT
s
0
' rIA 2
* M
46 INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
Public Employee Blanket Position Bond
Prior to the 1986 renewal the City had carried a bond with a
$300,000 limit. Last year the League offered only a $100,000
limit on a per person basis. No occurrence limit.
The Hartford quote is for $300,000 per occurrence. It is our
judgment that the $300,000 limit better suits the City of
Hutchinson's exposure. The deductible is $5,000 under the
Hartford contract and $1,000 under the current contract.
71
0EE 5510.,
c
YOU �I- _ P
I # M
INSURANCE PLANNERS
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
587 -2299
Boiler and Machinery: Improvement and expansion of coverage.
As per the attached letter from Hartford Steam Boiler, we are
currently insuring nine locations primarily for just boiler
coverage and other specific equipment. A list of current
locations is attached.
The proposal outlined in the letter includes 32 locations. The
type of items covered is included under the "Insured Equipment"
heading of the 3rd page of the proposal.
The proposed coverage will more adequately protect the Cities
interest and brings the coverage more in line with the exposures
the City has. This coverage has not been updated in the past
ten years.
roues
1IIIMY9Ct. MO[M
9
•
C
o-ofFSS�o N'
rI
('RAN, 1 10
0
OCILtk Ahw- MACHINERY
E
PLLL-'V NUMt. ,i , o o a o o * a a o
NANI; Ab,,LSS
L�C IN"tiALU 0 0 .. 0 4 * 4 4
1 0
LrFLCIIVE DATE • 1 1
eAvL 9 1 t QQi
)I mASHINGTON AYL W
iiUTLhjlY4q0j M&
cur
ran.
t
ee
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7-7
Lct-Arich
N,-e
— -15-066
CITY hALL
J7 WASdINGTCN AVg b
55350
60 HASSEN ST
HUTChjN§"
LOLAfICN
NO*
45-OC3
lois Hoy 15 s
huTCHINSONI mh
5535)
L-'CATLLh
NJ*
45-004
NURSING HOME
NCKTH HIGH DRIVE
Ht,TLH1N$ONt MN
;
55150
LLL^(ICh
"ua
4i-00>
FiLIKAf ION PI.ANT
146 5TH AVp NE
riALHINSUAll MN
it) j
1,0
cur
ran.
t
ee
`r
-,t ILt S. \i .••AC t t l N trtt
r' cC f l h. t;.:I e . • 7/C 1/ 7a
. t..T ?w• . . . . .•. . . . . . *t%-c14j 74b -C':
.;7 4A„,tlNt;fC•- it- A
r•uf;atINSCN• MIN
•,ii'•0
L(.'L -i IG..;
L ..flu:. _. - yi -CC:, ,ere C.PI AV..Trrnl
ih AVE SE t: C: :T «k IC
fl, [CHI '.SCats AN
L .AILt,% -
L _, - i L'-'f. ., _ ;. - 45-CG;
L.'- -T.:.\ r\_. - 4%.)-010
t,A.rc [REATnthf'PLANT
'iTt+ AWE .SE f CiJARlo
ruff.014SChp AN
�7 Sit)
. a\r halrYiR «NCt: ELILCik:,
f•t AWL $E d In7A+\I0
nufCHINf.Ohs
'AIT \Tc4ANCE GAeAGE
nuTCHt 4SGN♦
•
_RI ;::LE C3JEt:fi ANYMHtkc IN
Tr.. STATE Of +•':n
u f: HI +SGN• �h
i 5'J y�f
FI'.AL ,'AG"
C urpreprem
.y
rr
.c
Minneapolis Office
The Hanford
Stearn Boiler inspection
and lnwnnce Co.
May 14, 1987
Insurance Planners
P. 0. Box 68
135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attu: Dennis W. Potter
RE: City of Hutchinson
Policy No. MN- 8341748 -00
701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 610
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55.115
(612) 340-9955
MAY 1 81987
The above policy has an anniversary date of July 1, 1987.
We are currently insuring nine locations plus portable objects. The policy
provides coverage on a group description basis which insures boilers'and
unfired vessels only at eight of the locations and insures boilers, unfired
vessels, refrigeration systems, electric motors 75 HP and over, refrigeration
compressors, electric generators 100 &W and over, internal combustion
engines, and transformers 50 RVA and over at the Hospital location.
At your suggestion, I conducted a survey of the other locations owned by the
city that have a boiler and machinery exposure so we could offer a
comprehensive coverage quotation.
The following quotation is based on my survey:
Type of Policy - Extended Comprehensive
Property Damage Coverage:
$2,500,000 Limit Per Accident
Repair or Replacement - Included
Deductible - $1000
Objects Insured - See attached
Locations Insured:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
City Hall, 37 Washington Ave. W.
Library, 50 Hassen St.
Hospital, 1095 Hwy 15 South
Nursing Home, North High Drive
Filtration Plant, 146 5th Ave. N.E.
Park Department, 5th Ave. S.E. & Ontario
Waste Treatment Plant, 5th Ave. S.E. 6 Ontario
Park Maintenance Building, 5th Ave. S.E. 6 Ontario
- d
Minneapolis Office
The Hartford
Steam Boiler Inspection
and kuurance Co.
Page 2
May 14, 1987
Insurance Planners
701 Fourth Avenue Suwh, Suite (310
MuuicApoliu, Minncwu 55-115
(612) 340-9955
9) Maintenance Garage, Highway 22 South
10) Portable objects
11) Fire Hall
12) Liquor Store
13) Pump Houses #3, #4, #5, #6
14) Pump House #2, South Park
15) Water Tower, South Park
16) South Water Tower
17) North Water Tower
18) Cemetery
19) Hutchinson Civic Arena
20) Hutchinson Swimming Pool
21) Airport
22) Optimist Park.Building
23) Roberts Park
24) New Fire Hall, 3rd & Jefferson
25) Story Point Lift Station
26) McDonalds Lift Station
27) Shady Ridge Lift Station
28) Highway 15 Lift Station
29) Our Saviors Lift Station
30) Campbell Lane Lift Station
Annual Premium - $10,483.00 w Tk^ 10 00 D'e
9 iYo W.'TM ay00 Deal
The annual premium to renew this risk as is, would be $4844.00.
Please call me if you have any questions. I would be available to meet with
the Insured to discuss the proposal in greater detail.
Yours very truly,
R. L. Clemen
Account Executive
RClcr.mem
•
•
w
Insured Ubjecl:: cuvercd under Caty"rehenatve Ilut ter and Idachinery PsiI Icy.
:cub l,•rl 10 Deduct ible and Vol Iry Limits:
�IllL 1) Extended Comprehensive "'eludes Product tun Machinery
St :a"dat d L'wnprehen:, t ve excludes Product ton Mach nt "try
In. ^.u-ed Equipment:
Steam nealIng boilers
Steam piping
Mot water heating boilers
Hot water supply boilers -
fired and unfired pressure vessels
service of the premises (e.g. hot
hydropneu"natic tanks, condensate
steam kettles, steam cookers)
Air conditioning units
Electrical switchgear
Electrical cables and bus ducts
Transformers
Not ors
Generators
Emergency engine- generator sets
Centrifugal pumps
Reciprocating pumps
Centrifugal compressors
Reciprocating compressors
Deep well pump units
Internal combustion engines
Refrigerating systems
Small refrigerating units
Small air compressing units
Fans and blowers
Gears and gear sets
Turbines
Wheels
used for maintenance or
water tanks, air tanks,
tanks, expansion tanks,
PLUS any other electrical or mechanical equipment used for
maintenance or service of the premises.
1
TYPICAL EXPOSURES BY KIND OF ESTABLISHMENT
N
s
pp
. a.,.a, f.W
ld b j: i` c
0 a..ry Erl �*
�• 1 Y P!
� j �� � � ��
� �
1(O �
,� •
•s n puil3apc • 0 o A o
MBBauwarems
A& sr • • • • - 0
•
r• • • o - R
;- .O
• • • � :.,.
0 0
mre pox c °
mwIp abo
•
•
•
o
0
•
.
steam
•
o
•
•
•
•
•
q
G
•
•
Cal ftsw
cr•natal p�
♦
- •
•
o
•
•
•
•
•
'�
Glhs
•
•
•
O
°'
co*j pupas
•
•
•
0
cadsaotap *6 .
0
•
•
•
•'
0
•
N xre�.
Grdmarurc
♦
•
0
0
0
0
o
•
.
CaNalesraat
•
•
•
•
G
•
o
0
••
Cas"dub6
•
•
•
0
•
•
0
•
�T"
Gxi•
•
•
•
•
•
Q
f
a
Dry damn
•
O
•
•
-0
Food pmcoWQ
•
•
O
O
•
•
•
•
O
p
•
'•
fana�ea
•
•
•
O
Fareol hmm -
•
•
•
• "
Gaups
•
•
O
J
n
C
•
;..
Gmwku ea
•
•
Ho""
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
o
o
'l
•
• -'*
Holm
•
•
•
O
•
•
O
•
O
0
-•
I
mwdKum iK
•
•
0
0
0
•
I ygels
•
•
•
O
O
0
0
• '
Wmcpa autlrpa
•
•
•
0
0
o
O
. •
on" a"%
•
•
•
J
O
Q .
0
•
.
Paper nx*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ftua pdanag
•
•
u
•
•
1
•
0
PaaaYWwDaV
•
•
•
O
O
-
Rtk pmtJag,
•
•
0
O
O
O
• -
T '
Rarprp amm
•
•
•
•
O
•
•
`•
Resa"z
•
• ,
•
•
_
O
0
. $COOaIb
•
•
C
O
O
O
•
s1Ya"@AW06
•
•
c
J
•
saes
•
•
•
O
O
...
G
O
•
Tnwt • • • J o • '
Uwe ,e ec ncl • • • • • • •
WateaSes • • °.
•
C`
•
INSURABLE EQUIPMENT AND ITS HAZARDS
TYPE OF
TYPICAL
SOME OF THE CAUSES
EQUIPMENT
FAILURES
Bourn and bw ptwrw
Enpasm
Overpressure. naonm or nw mrA r4WYOM wecare wl m
eeude
Burrrp
Caved take: bvwatr ale t0leaiag eaks4nrDlWUe:AmenpkprM
Btrgnp
Snwaaadrmlim p.IWne mpgmw
oackng
tAemal strenes:nBt busap: des rotltpamus wrbiYre
"Ad numbpw curt
Espbem
dtsi reacem: rAw*Aof sitlepWe rWl dercs9400
till" w wrla, caak$M
I�essure:
doom
Urg
Thm%dmewlmetoomm.camwm
wrp ,on
Slum as d Pressure. conlrol Urre
oackng
Vbralm. stwdwalllaws:poorweft
Floboming rd air co i
oai W")
voraeon: suppon"re. veWe mDadlba OR MCW.Ch gC1101l K%Q
N ow@kP*B
oa*w Nessels)
Fam of lbw swlett: mpoper WM: finewep
Eapmlon
Overpressure. caardlaikue:carosim
PIpbB�Wnka,MC.)
E■pasm
VOraam. slam taiYYe. owe inpad
crackny
Support Were Ireemo AXatm
EMdriamigeteetae
Endrra;burnout
A, cng: rw surge excess" msture :JwWwrdWbrnle+sultson,rermr
Kid otter maw* WKUI t
Igronrrg
Burned bearrgs
MSakpreriee inwoule i oratm
Stat frame or rdorb6akage-
Overspew. metal talgae: snodk ii mYw!grrwn; slim
cenviargat mrrr worm
Erpnsmicentmugai)
Lossd bad, canna failure. metal wogw a MWN emwa
pop Mos,bbwers
8wnn burgs
WAVirnra:lasdkUrcatm
Shift. peyg.rnpekerbreakaw
MS ikgfrwt." ewltaigeeloregnrrawwl :aArbadmwesseeaso
Beapomting CmrpRWrs,
Cdr carriage
Lwdsw,ggug.00nWWted0l1 seargasarng ale to rwaeaateklOrrcaoon
pianos, MWO mr11111111AW
Shaft. lod breakage
Msakgsrent . slnckkkadprogresv +eaadcloosengolpim
n
hriel. Imle ergne bock
Feereup: lmengdbms progressworadcl[rsdrlookrpmedtm
damage
i'uraws
1., on
Orerspeed, loss d bao: mnrd Woo
Bwc.goarw
Shroud ring ladure: erdatln: abdance: pbgreBera COCK CWWAVA SO=
vapor sd om
Shan hwlwge
Msakgromm: pearrgltl»: bdr d knbaGm:alot bad
Casrg breakage
Vbratm: propressrve crack:tlemwl stress
Fa0edawengemam
(Halerw particular ePprierit swim abs* ,
p^,, etc
Gum gm sets
B u en teeth
Voratm. rrealgmwnr. msapokcatm. pldgressi+e crack; mewl LVA
1,ec wrings
Msakganea: rwdoete ab?awn
I
Mrscrwnill Fractkrrs
Braakrg of mvvg Parts
Wfatgla: tturrgp pars wtdr pewum:bwetrydbwroCbso
low mKillrras, h *wk
Wham, auudra, wi"4 e`e
nraclwwcl
Frarne a cokym aamage
Msal wwa.. w= bad oven" caacmml won
7rmNomws
Elewcal burnout
kipta(leg.rrw surge. eacesshe moswre: dwrloratim 01 mom narload. corn
Iamlwted rtnYartg Wad
YfC/Yrwaus elacbral sp.
Elecebal ourrlow
LgMlrg.besuge.8xCe55N2 maSwre: Pba nwNrwned nYj6rd OpIrIG
Paws Rwibmords, coo
Pars: pose cmecuon: wrtbad, caMU M
bus duds, drag hems)
Ai oxdV01" urAS,"
IRrer to cwvrzm teabN to parromi carpowmdtIferrmilli
robvr" and CampeuYg
mass, cwp w& wtwes, W.)
mu
t
L LEN uu
67 league of minnes to cities
g o
LMCIT CHANGES IN C^ OVERAGE
LMCIT has made a number of changes in the liability coverage
documents. The language has been simplified considerably, and
most of the coverage provisions which were formerly handled by
endorsements are now incorporated into the body of the document.
There are also a number of substantive changes
coverage. These changes eliminate many of the
internal inconsistencies of the old coverage f
coverage in a number of areas, and oonform the
more closely to the city's statutory duties to
indemnify its employees.
in the
ambiguities and
Drms, broaden the
coverage such
defend and
The format of the liability coverage document is as follows:,
I. COVERAGES 1.
A. General Liability
B. Medical Payments
C. Personal Injury
D. Errors and Omissions
E. Automotive Liability
II. WHO IS COVERED
III. LIMITS OF COVERAGE
IV. DEFINITIONS
V. SUPPLEMENTARY PAYMENTS
VI. CONDITIONS
Tnis memo summarizes the major substantive changes in the
coverage. (The change to a "claims -made" format is described in
a separate accompanying memo.) Keep in mind that this memo is
just a summary. It will be important for cities and agents to
read and understand the actual coverage document.
1. Police Exposures The general liability coverage part has
been broadened to provide the city and its employees coverage
for the use of reasonable force to protect persons or property.
Further, -the personal injury coverage part has been broadened to
cover the city and its employees for assault or battery
committed for the purpose of protecting persons or property, or
incidental to an arrest.
. , , .. , -� t,y jvenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600
•
�J
i
2. Cavil rights coverage The errors
revised to make it explicit that Sec. and omissions is
rights claims are covered. (Note that LMCIT a has consistently
ently
taken the position that most of these claims were already
covered under the old forms; thus, this is more a aclarification
than an expansion of coverage,)
3. Defense coverage The statutes and court oases make it clear
that a city�s- -'"—du y to pay for defense
employees is much broader than its duty of or its authorisation to
errors and omissions its officers and
indemnify them. The general Its
personal injury, and
sections are revised to reflect this broad to defend section brings thelcoverageAOfrdamages in the "conditions"
defense) into conformance with the damages
etatutotg+yidyty gad
Power to indemnify its employees.
4. Punitive damages LMCIT has consistently taken the
that pun t e damages will not be indemnified. This Is DOW made
explicit. Note though that LMCIT would still Dover the defense
Of suits for punitive damages, provided that the actions loading
it
to the su arose in the course of the employees duties...
5. Errors and omissions exclusions Formerly LMCIT,s errors and
omissions coverage, 1 ke nt.-,r y every other
form, excluded coverage for errors and omissions
property damage, bodily injury, and
personal injury, This created a potential coverage gap for
those claims which didn't arise out of an "Occurrence" (1060,
an accident), but which resulted in property damage or bodily
injury. (One example might be a claim for
arising out of a decision to abate an allegeo d uisa damage
on'issionsacoveragerhasebeen broadenedeconsrablyotoeeliminate
t =mss Possible gap, d e
Professional services exclusion
ex;;_�e_ The "pro essiona serrlces aexeluaionato en ineer
coverage part has been modified so that only the professional
iability
services provided by an attorney, arohiteet; medical doctor,
drr; 1st, nurse, or pharmacist are excluded. Thus, other
professional serivees, such as those of an ambulance attendant,
paramedic, "First Responder," etc, are not excluded. Similarly,
the Professional exposure of a professional engineer who is an
employee of the city is no longer excluded. (Consulting
engineers would continue to be excluded as independent
contractors.) These changes eliminate the need for a separate
"ambulance malpractice" or "engineer's malpractice" policy to
Protect city employees and volunteers.
This revised "professional services" exclusion can also be
expanded coverage ePortthe remaindereofetheeexistingvpolicy sa.
eadorz;ed on to term.
•
7. Aa�reaate limits All annual aggregate limits have been
eliminated with two exceptions: products liability and medical
payments.
8. Fellow em to eg exclusion The "fellow employee" exclusion
has beer, removed rom the general liability and.automobile
coverages. Coverage is now provided for claims made against one
employee of the city by another employee.
9. Medical payments The "medical paymen"" coverage has been
modified to apply only to bodily injury arising out:of a
condition on premises which the city owns or rents. This does
not include streets, sidewalks or boulevards, except for those
abutting city -owned buildings or city -owned parking lots.
10. Employment-related claims Contractual obligations (not
to be confused w.th contractually- assumed tort liability) are
generally not covered under the liability coverages. However,
the errors and omissions coverage has been modified to provide
coverage for employment- related obligations, except for wages
and benefits owing.
11. Firefighters liabilit c The automobile liability Coverage
now specifically prov es overage to firefighters for the use
of any automobile (includl:;, the firefighter's own automobile)
in the performance of his official duties. Cities are'requirod
by statute to provide this indemnification.
12. Relief associations Local fire or pollee relief
associations and the r officers, employees, and semb$rs are now
lisLed as covered parties under the liability coverages.
13. Join c powers entities The coverage contract now
specifically excludes coverage of any joint powers entity, and
:.;',.:.y :,Ly liability arising out of the activities of a joint
do,.er-- e..LiLy, unless specifically named in the declarations.
in:s does not mean that LMCIT will not cover joint powers
cr +Lieia�. Where coverage is needed for the activities of a
joint ,;suers entity, LMCIT will issue a separate coverage
C:- u:: -ac Lo the joint powers entity. That coverage will also
,a:..a 'aCn of the entity's constituent cities ss additional
cnv.r.d parties. This approach has the advantage of putting all
L01" ::overage relating to the joint entity's activities under
sind_c coverage document, rather than involving the liability
x uar & of each of the constituent cities.
Note also that the exclusion applies only to those joint powers
;rac:ua:,:a which actually create a separate joint entity. Joint
power:; ::.ntracts under which the city is merely providing
services to or receiving services from another political
subdivision, don't create any special problems under the city's
LMCIT coverage.
L ou 11
tLuj league of minnesota cities
LMCIT "CLAIMS -MADE" LIABILITY FORMS
LMCIT will use a "claims -made" coverage-form for general
liability and public officials errors and omissions coverage
written after Nov. 15. (Automotive liability coverage will
continue to be written on an " occurrenoe" basis.) This memo is
intended to help explain to city officials what this change
means, the problems "claims -made" coverage can create for the
buyer, and how LMCIT has dealt with those problems.
The primary reason for changing to "olaims -made" coverage was
that it would have been difficult or impossible for LMCIT to get
reinsurance if an "occurrence" form were used. "Claias -made"
coverage also simplifies underwriting and rating to zone extent,
since the underwriter does hot have to try to predict and allow
for possible future changes in the law governing liability for
occurrences during the current year.
What is "claims -made" cover ile ?
The basic erence be wren claims -made" and "ooeurrenee"
coverage is in which claims are payable under a particular
policy. With "ooeurrenoe" coverage, the key Question is when
the incident happened. If the incident occurred during the
policy period, it is covered regardless of when the claim is
made. (This assumes, of course, that the incident is gne which
falls within the kinds of claims that the policy covers.)
With "claims -made" coverage, whether a claim is covered by a
particular policy depends not only on when the incident occurred
but also on when the claim was first made. This can perhaps
best be illustrated by an example.
Consider a "claims -made" policy which runs for the calendar
year. The 1987 policy will cover claims arising out of
incidents which happened during 1987, ro�videedd the claim was
also made during 1987. When that polioy�2 renewed for 1988,
the 1988 policy will cover claims made during 1988 which arise
out of incidents that happened during either 1987 or 1988. The
1989 renewal, then, will cover claims made during 1989 for
incidents which happened during 1987, 1988, or 1989.
Thus, each successive renewal of a "claims -aade" policy covers a
greater number of claims. This is the reason why "olains -aade"
coverage is cheaper during the first year, and why each
successive renewal of a "claims -made" policy becomes more
expensive. (The cost does level off after about five yiars.)
. _11 Ly avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (6121227 -5600
Potential problems with "claims -made coverage
The problem with "claims• made" coverage really arises when you
want to change carriers. The new carrier typically won't want
to accept risk for claims arising out of incidents which
happened before the inception date of his policy. This can
create a gap in coverage, for claims made after the date of the
change in carriers for incidents which happened before the
change. Unless special steps are taken, neither carrier will
cover those claims.
There are two ways to solve this probleml either will Involve
paying some additional premium to someone. One is to get the
new carrier to agree to cover claims from those earlier
incidents. However, most carriers are very reluctant to do
this, although it is certainly worth inquiring about if you find
yourself in this situation. The second way is to get the old
carrier to agree to cover those claims, even though the claim
happens after his policy has expired. (This agreement is called
an "extended reporting period. ") Of course, the old carrier has
no particular incentive to agree to give you that extension, or
to charge a reasonable price if he does agree to do it.
This is why is is extremely important in purchasing a
"claims -made" policy to :cake sure that the policy gives you the
right buy an extended r�dorting period. Unfortunately, many
"claims -made" policies give the buyer that right only if the
carrier cancels or refuses to renew the coverage. Thus, if the
buyer decides not to renew the coverage, the old carrier is
under no obligation to offer an extended reporting period.
If an extended reporting period is offered, it may be only for a
limited time - sometimes as little as a year or two. An
extended reporting period of limited duration certainly is
better than nothing, but if there is any time limit at all, the
potential gap still exists.
A third problem is that even if the policy gives you the right
to buy an unlimited extended reporting period, the cost to buy
that extension probably won't be specified. You'll have to pay
whatever the old carrier feels like charging. (The' standard
"claims -made" forms recommended by ISO, for example, state only
that the cost of the extended reporting period can't exceed 200%
of the last year's premium.)
How LMCIT addresses those r em
pobls
LMCIT's revised coverage document includes an automatic 60 day
extended reporting period. It also gives the city the right to
purchase an extended reporting period of unlimited duration.
The city has this right regardless of whether it i$ the city's
or LMCIT's decision not to continue the coverage. The cost of
purchasing the extended reporting period is specified in the IN
coverage document itself.
Because the LMCIT coverage document offers.an unlimited extended
reporting period for a known cost, the city really.has available
the equivalent of "occurrence" coverage. The city may wish to set
aside each year the funds necessary to purchase the extended
reporting period; i.e., roughly 35% of premium the first year,
18; the second year, 8% the third year, and so on. After five
years, the cost of the extended reporting period stops
increasing, so that no further funds would need to be set aside.
(The exact percentages needed would vary somewhat depending on
changes in the city's rating base from year to year.)
s
:7
The cost
depends on how long the
city has been
covered under the
"claims -made"
coverage. It ranges
from 34.61
of premium if
coverage
has been for one year,
has been for five years
up to 70.8% of
or more. By
premium if
comparison,
coverage
standard
ISO "claims -made" forms
allow a range.
of up to 200 %.
Other forms often say nothing at
all about the
cost of extending
coverage.
Because the LMCIT coverage document offers.an unlimited extended
reporting period for a known cost, the city really.has available
the equivalent of "occurrence" coverage. The city may wish to set
aside each year the funds necessary to purchase the extended
reporting period; i.e., roughly 35% of premium the first year,
18; the second year, 8% the third year, and so on. After five
years, the cost of the extended reporting period stops
increasing, so that no further funds would need to be set aside.
(The exact percentages needed would vary somewhat depending on
changes in the city's rating base from year to year.)
s
:7
CHANGE ORDER
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDITION
A!„ DOCUMENT G7011CM
PROJECT: HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION
(name, address) Hutchinson, Minnesota
TO (Contractor):
STRAUGHAN HARDWARE COMPANY, INC.
2200 East 25th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404
Distribution to
OWNER
❑
ARCHITECT
❑
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ❑
CONTRACTOR
❑
FIELD
❑
OTHER
❑
CIIANGE ORDFR NUMBER: I
INITIATION DATE: June 16, 1987
ARCFIITECT'S PROJECT NO:
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER'S
PROJECT NO: 86 -645
CONTRACT FOR: FINISH HARDWARE
CONTRACT DATE: April 23, 1987
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
ADO for changes as required to provide a 4 -hour fire separation
pursuant to Addendum Number 4 dated April 27, 1987, and revised
drawings dated March 27, 1987, in accordance with State of
Minnesota requirements.
TOTAL CHANGE TO CONTRACT SUM: ADD $1,930.00
•
Not valid until signed by the Owner, the Architect and the Construction Manager.
Signature of the Contractor indicates agreement herewith, including any adiustment in the Contract Slim or the Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) TiXNUXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX was ........................... $ 19,310.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders .... ............................... $ 0 -0
The (Contract Sum) (KXXSXM,&UXtXXXXXXXXXXXX7t1 prior to this Change Order was ......... $ 19,310.00
The (Ccn!ract Sum) (X1()( XXXKAXXK7XXXXXx1(X3CX) will be (increased)X(X7�E)iKb (Z(b X7Ei4�j
by this Change Order ........................... ............................... $ 1,930.00
The new (Contract Sum) (IXX0(XKXXXXX9XXXXX'XNX191XX including this Change Order will be ... $ 21,240.00
The Contract Time will be (1XXX)0XKkXX1KKNXKXXX (unchanged) by ZERO ( -0- ) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
Recommended:
CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, INC
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER
7401 Central
Avenue Northeast
ADDRESS
Minn apolis,
Minnesota 55432
BY
Agreed To:
STRAUGHAN HARDWARE COMPANY, INC.
CONTRACTOR
X2200 East 25th
Street
ADDRESS
Minneapolis,
Minneso a 55404
.
d;171% ATE
A%
AIA DOCUMENT
® 1900 • THE ,
Approved:
THORBECK i LAMBERT, INC.
1409 Willow Street
ADDRESS
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
BY DATE
Authorized:
CITY OF.IIUTCIIINSON
OWNER
37 Washington Avenue West
ADDRESS
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
BY DATE
'CHANCE ORDER • CONSTRUCTION MIANAGEMENT EDITION • IUNE 19M EDITION • AIAs
INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
c;ol /cM 930
i
HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION
0 • •
j
i
BID PACKAGE
- TRADE CONTRACTOR
......._...
CONTRACTS RETURNED :
_...._.. .._...............
BASE BID
REVISION
BASE BID + REVISION
...............
....... .. ..........
_._..... ........... ........
.._......
I... . .._.... .. _. _....... ......... _....
TO CAM
:. _....... .. ............ ..........
....:
... ....................
_......_ ............. _.
xi
EARTHWORK
'E &T EXCAVATION
JUNE 2, 1987
6,993
0
............
6,993
a2
LANDSCAPE
:MA RGOLIS
MAY 5 1987
4 570:
.....0
4,570
x3 -
ASPHALT CONCRETE
:ATKINSON ........._. _._......
JUNE 9 1987
.__...
10 702
.. ...........
0
......._.
10,702
........_...
x4 -
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING
..........
PART OF BID PKG x6 ...._..
__
...... ..._..
0
0
D
x5-
..
CONCRETE WORK, CONCRETE FL. TOP
..... __.
!PETER'S CONSTRUCTION
. _.._. . _.._...
` MAY 5, 1987
..
30,983 -:
.........
0
..
30,983
......... ....l........
x6 -
.......... ...._......... _........_.. _.......
STRUCTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE
............
BLADHOLM
....... .. ..............
._.......... ..._..
18,292
1,219
...
19,511
...... ........ _...
x7 -
.._...... .............
UNIT MASONRY
PINSKE
-. June 22, 1987
81,695:
1,600 !
83,295
x8
METAL FABRICATION
STAR IRON ... .._.........
JUNE 18, 1987
... ....
8,233:
... ......
... 0
8,233
_............ ......
x9
ROUGH CARPENTRY MATERIALS'
.PINSKE BUILDERS
JUNE 22, 1987
21,271 !
0
21,271
x10
- CARPENTRY i NSTA L L A T I ON ' LABOR'
:GOPHER STATE
24,015:
2,017.
25,032
X11
- PRE WOOD TRUSSES
:GREAT PLAINS
JUNE 10, 1987
.....
1. 8,333
-35
.......
8,298
_.....
0 12
- ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK
:RON S CABINET
JUNE 19,.1987
0
......... 10,087
x13
- EXTERIOR TRIM
DIRECT PURCHASE
NA
6,025
0
6,025
x14
- SHEET WATERPROOFING
'NICH0LS &.HINES
JUNE 9, 1987
5,193
0
5,193
x15
JOINT SEALERS
CARC 10 FIN I
JUNE 15, 1987
2,389
0
2,384
x16
SECURITY HOLLOW METAL
TR51 LT
MAY 27, 1987
3,710
0
3,710
x 17
STEEL DOORS & FRAMES
SE. A LL HRDWARE
JUNE 15 1987
8 495
505
Q, 000
x 18
- WOOD DOORS
SELL HARDWARE
JUNE 15, 1987
.........
2,385
26
2,411
_.........
x19
.. ..
- STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS
....... ... ... _..
:SPRING VALLEY OVERHEAD
JUNE 2, 1987
2,936 i
0
2,936
x20
- STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS __.,..,
NYSTROM
...... JUNE.22,. 1987
._... 7,245 ........
........ 0,;
_,__,__ 7,245
...5
x21
- WOOD WINDOWS
GREAT PLAINS
JUNE 10, 1987
5,205 :.
0
5,205
x22
- FINISH HARDWARE
STRAUGHN HARDWARE .. ......... .. .
JUNE 15, 1987 .......,
19,310..:,..,_
1,930
_ 21,240
923
- GLASS & GLAZING
:NEW ULM GLASS
JUNE 9, 1987
4,138
0
4,138
424
- LATH & PLASTER
IGAUSMAN BUILDERS
JUNE 17, 1987
___. .._._._
3,600:
.... .._...__.....
1,782
..... _....._.
___.... ....... 5,582
....
x25
_....... _. ...__ ................ _..__.....__.........
- GYPSUM DRYWALL
....__. __.__ ..___
-BER -WALL
- JUNE 23, 1987
16,170
0
16,170
x26
-TILE
:JERRY'S TILE
JUNE 2, 1987
4,597
0
1,597
027
- ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
:HENDLEY'S INC.
MAY 27, 1987
11 ,81 75:
0 I
1,875
x28
- RES ILIENT FLOOR I NG
:BARI L'5 PA INT &CARPET
JUNE 15, 1987
:.....__ ......... _. _..
1,507:
...__.._...........
0
_.....
1,507
_............__._........._....
................
029
._.. _...... ._._. ........._....
- CARPETING
....... _........ _........ _. _............
!BARIL'PAINT & CARPET
.:_..._
JUNE 15, 1987 !
3,938:
0
3,938
x30
...........
- PAINTING
.
:R &H PAINTING
JUNE 2, 1987.
12,900.
x31
SPECIALTIES
SPECIALTIES
JUNE 18,.1987
,....__12,559
0
12,559
x32
- PROJECTION SCREENS
BARTLEY SALES
JUNE 23, 1987
....__...._ __.......
209
.......... _..........
0
......
_. ........ _,...209..1
.... .........................._....
x33
_........... ..._. _...............
- WINDOW TREATMENT
_.___ _....... ....___......__._....__........
:ON WINDOW
JUNE 17, 1987
789:
0
789
_....._ .. _......
034
_ ........ ..... _.... ....... __
- PIPE & EQUIPMENT INSULATION
.. ..._ ....... ............ .........._ .
:ALLIED MECH
_ ..... _........ .........
MAY 27, 1987
_._.........
8,413 :
._.......
2,255
10,668
x35
PLUMBING
:WEST SIDE_PLB &,HEAT.
JUNE Z, 1987
49,383 49 383
.. 560..._._.
49,943
.. ...... ...... ... ......
OTECTION
. .... .,.
C
..,...
Z ' 1987
.._..
6,550
0
037
-
HEATING
WEST SIDE PLB & HEAT
JUNE2,1987
24,929
p..
24,929
0 • •
j
i
HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION
....................................... ........ ................................
...............
#38- H.V.A.C. ALLIED MECH
. ......
MAY 27, 1987
. ..........
......... ..........
42,270
...............
..........
3,305 ......
............
45,575
#39 - CONTROLS & INSTRUMENTATION ALLIED MECH
......... ..... ...... ....
MAY 27, 1987
16,588
0
16,588
040 - ELECTRICAL IMCNERNEY INDUST.
JUNE 17, 1987
84,018
951
84,969
ROOF & SHEETMETAL ALLOWANCE
---
5,000
5,000
TOTAL BASE BID PACKAGE
582,595
..... . ....
TOTAL REVISION
.... .. ....
........... .....
21, 115
.. ..
TOTAL BASE + REVISION
60-"310
CONTINGENCY
11,642
GENERAL CONDITIONS
55,467
55,457
. . ........ AE FEES
59,669
59,669
CM FEES
35,000
........... ..
35,000
!TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
744,473
.................
TOTAL CONST, WITH REVISIONS
............ ...... .......... .......... -... - .......
........ ..
.... ......... ........... ...... ........................ .......
........ . . ..
... ........ ........
............. . .............. ...... .
........... .. ................. - ................ ...... ........
............. ....... I ........
.. ..........
... . . ... .. ... .. .....
...... ... .....
..... . ......
..........
....................
.......
..... ..... . ..
........
.........
765,588
....... ........ .
.......... .. - - -
......
.........
4 0 0 9
•
0
HUTCHINSON POLICE STATION
BID PACKAGE TRADE CONTRACTOR
I -
................
EARTHWORK
...............
E I & I . T I EXCAVATION . I
02-
LANDSCAPE
MARGOLIS
93 -
ASPHALT CONCRETE I
ATKINSON
04 -
PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE P AVING
PART OF BID PKG #6
#5_
CONCRETE WORK, CONCRETE FL. TOP
:PETER'S CONSTRUCTION
06 -
STRUCTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE
BLADHOLM
07 -
UNIT MASONRY
PINSKE
08 -
METAL FABRICATION
(STAR IRON
09 -
ROUGH CARPENTRY "MATERIALS'
PINSKE BUILDERS
#10
- CARPENTRY INSTALLATION -LABOR-
:GOPHER STATE
# I I
- PRE WOOD TRUSSES
:GREAT PLAINS
012
- ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK
IRON'S CABINET
013
- EXTERIOR TRIM
DIRECT PURCHASE
14
- SHEET WATERPROOFING
NICHOLS & HINES
#15
- JOINT SEALERS
CARCIOFINI
1016
- SECURITY HOLLOW METAL
TRUSSBILT
017
STEEL DOORS & FRAMES
SELL HARDWARE
# 18
- WOOD DOORS
SELL HARDWARE
. 019
- STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS
:SPRING VALLEY . OVERHEAD
020
STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS
NYSTROM
021
- WOOD WINDOWS . ... . ........
GREAT PLAINS
IZZ
- FINISH HARDWARE
.... ...... ..
:STRAUGHN HARDWARE
023
- GLASS & GLAZING
NEW ULM GLASS
024
- LATH & PLASTER
GAUSMAN BUILDERS
025
- GYPSUM DRYWALL
:BER -WALL
026
- TILE
JERRY'S TILE
027
- ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
:HENDLEY'S INC.
#2i-
RESILIENT FLOORING
BAR I L'S PAINT & CARPET
029
- CARPETING
BARIUPAINT & CARPET
030
- PAINTING
& H PAINTING
. 031
- SPECIALTIES
SPECIALTIES
032
- PROJECTION SCREENS
BARTLEY SALES
933
- WINDOW TREATMENT
ION WINDOW
034
- PIPE & EQUIPMENT INSULATION
ALLIED MECH
035
- PLUMBING
....... . ...
:WEST SIDE PLB. & HEAT
036
- FIRE PROTECTION
ALLIED MECH
037-
.. ..........
HEATING
WEST SIDE PLO & HEAT
FOR YOUR INFORMATION 0
TO CAM
JUNE 2,
1987
6,993
0
6,995
MAY 5,
1987
4,570
0
4,570
.,,JUNE 91,
1987 .
10,79?:
0
10,702
0 I . .....
..... 0
0
.:.._.....MAY 5.,.
1987
0
30,983
19,511
1,600
83,295
JUNE 18,1987,_
8,233
i ... I ..
... 1. 1. 0
8,233
I ......
2 1
0
21,271
214,015
2,017
26,032
JUNE 10,
1987
8,333
-35
8,298
JUNE 19,_1987
10,087
0
10,087
I NA
6,025
0
6,025
JUNE gl,.
1987
5, 193
0
5,193
JUNE 15,
1987
2,384
0
MAY .2 7,
19187
0
3,710
JUNE 15,
1987
8,495
505
9,000
JUNE 15,
1987
2,385
26
2,411
JUNE 2,
1987..
0
2,936
7,245
0
7,245
5,205
JUNE 15,
1987
19,310
1,930
21,240
JUNE 9,
1987
4,138
0
41138
JUNE 17,
1987
3,800
1,782
5,582
16,170
0
16,170
JUNE 2,
1987
4,597
0
4,597
..... MAY 27,
11987.
1,875,
0
......
JUNE 15,
1987
1,507
0
1,507
JUNE 15,
... . .. .. .......
1987
......
3,938
0
3,938
JUNE 2,
1987
1
12,900
0
12,900
JUNE 18,
1 98 . 7
12,559
0
12,M
209 ......
......... 0
209
JUNE 17,
1987
789
0
789
MAY 27,
1987
8,113
2,255
10,668
JUNE 2,
1987
19,383
560
149,943
MAY 27,
1987 .........
. ..
... 6,550
0
6,550
JUNE 2,
1987
24,9Z9
0
24,929
0
' HUTCH|NSUNPVL|CE STATION
9
u
439 - CONTROLS & INSiRUMENTAT 16N ALLIED MECH
MAY Z7, 1987
16,588
0
16,588
#40 - ELECTRICAL MCNERNEY INDUST.
JUNE 17, 1987
84,018
951
,ROOF & SHEETMETAL ALLOWANCE
5,000
5,000
:TOTAL BASE BID PACKAGE
582,695
TOTAL REVISION
21,115
TOTAL BASE + REVISION
GENERAL CONDITIONS
55,467
55,467
AE FEES
59,669
59,669
:TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
744,473
TOTAL CONST. WITH REVISIONS
�
,--`.-~----................... ....... ---��----.--`^.................. ......... '4
^~^--........... -........................ ---.'�---...... -............ ...
............ ---.-.........
................ ----'�-�-----�--.......
.-----�------'�-----'------'
....................
755,588
---'_�---|
9
u
•
RESOLUTION NO. 8560
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST 1
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
TV Inspection of Pipe
5,000.0
Inspection
Waste-
Yes
Visu -Sewer Clean-
water
ing & Seal Inc.
IV The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
I DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Presstre Pump
4,645.OD
Replacement Pump - Jetter
Sewer
Yes
Flexible Pipe Too
Co.
Date Approved:
• Motion made by:
Seconded by:
June 23. 1987
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HU T IC H!NSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 22, 1987
TO: Mayor & City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
------------------------------
SUBJECT: Utilities Usage - 500 Fischer
-- — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
• As per Council members
request, Doris at
the Utilities has
informed
me of
the following:
TOTAL
USAGE PERIOD
ELECTRIC
GAS
TAX
BILL
11/18/86 - 12/18/86
120 kw $8.03
18,881 $68.95
.50
$77.48
12/18/86 - 1/20/87
80 kw 5.45
15,145 58.34
.33
64.12
The water meter card is attached. The meter was read January 20, 1987. The
usage for the three month period was less than 1,000 gallons as the reading
stayed at 11932. See attached.
/ms
Attachment
0
F -A'
Y i � .r
F _
S
T?
Z t r
AUIl li 1
- MAY
ov L L K
NOV I�I� PLC
AUG
MAY
.1
5
Yy
e $
tAN
Al
MINUTES
BOARD OF REVIEW FOR ASSESSMENTS
JUNE 17, 1987
• The Board of Review met at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
Present were Mayor Paul Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, Marlin Torgerson and
Pat Mikulecky, City Administrator Gary Plotz, and McLeod County Assessors Brad
Emans and Hal Kirchoff.
Mayor Ackland opened the meeting and stated that individuals would be heard in
the order their names appear on the signup sheet. Brad Emans stated that the
mean assessment this year is from 90 to 100 percent of market value. The city
assessment was increased by a total of 5 percent this year.
Individuals were heard in order and after all had been heard, the Board of
Review discussed the requests, reviewed County Assessors' information, and
made determinations.
1. CLARA STURGES - 945 Jefferson St. - assessment too high.
Action - No change. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
2. PEGGY REESE - 434 Main No. - assessment too high for 2nd floor.
Action - Change from 1 3/4 story to 1 1/2 story if warranted by
inspection of assessor. M /Carls, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
3. GALEN GORANOWSKI - 475 School Road - 4 -plex - assessment too high.
Action - No Change. M /Torgerson, S /Carla, Unanimous.
• 4. RAY KAMRATH - 435 Jefferson 8 325 Jefferson - rentals overestimated.
Action - No Change. M /Torgerson, S /Ackland, Unanimous.
5. TERRY HOLTZ - 370 West Pishney - can't sell at assessed price.
Action - Lower to $35,000. M /Carls, S /Torgerson, Unanimous.
6. EVELYN ROSS - 972 Rolling Greens Lane - assessed higher than they paid.
Action - No Change. M /Torgerson, S/Mikulecky, Unanimous.
7. DOLORES FRATZKE - No question.
8. DAVE BAGNE /KING MOTEL - assessment too high based on rentals.
Action - No Change. M /Mikulecky, S /Torgerson, Unanimous.
9. JOHN TAPIO /HOTEL CALIFORNIA - assessment too high based on rentals.
Action - Reduce by 15 percent. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
10. WES WEGNER - outbuildings overvalued; can't sell.
Action - Reduce to $33,000, providing outbuildings are removed by next
year. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
DEFOREST WEGNER - outbuildings overvalued; will be tearing down.
Action - Reduce by 10% on dwellings only. M /Mikulecky, S /Torgerson,
Unanimous.
•
V "
11. GERALD KOELLN - 555 Main So. - assessed higher than he paid for it.
Action - Reduce to $57,000. M /Carls, S /Torgerson, Unanimous.
12. WALLY STUCKE - assessed higher than he paid for it.
Action - Reduce to $30,500. M /Carls, S /Torgerson, Unanimous. •
13. BRAD AND STEVE WICK - 500 Fischer - claim homestead for 1986.
Action - Decision will be made by June 23. (Alderman Mikulecky excuses
himself from this matter.)
14. ROGER STEARNS - 271 3rd Ave N.W. - old building overvalued.
Action - Reduce to $5,400. M /Carls, S /Torgerson, Unanimous.
15. LORRAINE SCHMELING - 404 Alan - assessed too high based on appraisal.
Action - Reduce to last year's value. M /Torgerson, S /Carls, Unanimous.
16. RICHARD SCHMIDTBAUER - error on deed on one property - rental properties
should be assessed similar values.
Action - Assessor will review deed question.
- No change on rental properties. M /Torgerson, S/Mikulecky, Unan.
17. BOB MLYNAR /AMERICINN - valuation too high.
Action - Refer to county.
18. BRENT SCHMELING - 754 Laura - valuation too high.
Action - No change. M/Mikulecky, S /Carls, Unanimous.
19. BOB HORNICK - Hwy 7 - 2 parcels - uninhabitable building to be torn down.
Action - Reduce 1 parcel to $7,200. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
- Leave vacant parcel at $6,200. M /Torgerson, S /Ackland, Unan.
20. MARY BARRICK - 587 Franklin - rental, poor condition, can't sell. •
Action - Reduce to $26,000. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
21. JOE PRIBYL - 1220 7th Ave. N.W. - rate different than similar homes.
Action - Assessor will provide him correct information on similar homes.
22. CHUCK BRILL - appraised too high.
Action - Reduce to $38,000. M /Torgerson, S /Carls, Unanimous.
23. CHRIS JOHNSON - 626 Harmony Lane - claiming homestead for 1986.
Action - Assessor will take care of this.
Consideration of requests received by letter:
24. RALPH NEUMANN - Rolling Oaks Lane - assessed higher than he paid for it.
Action - No Change. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
25. JOHN MLYNAR - for Clifton Heights residences - too high.
Action - Assessor feels they are assessed at 95 % evaluation.
No Change. M /Mikulecky, S /Ackland, Unanimous.
26. GLADYS PETERSON - 95 5th Ave. N.W. - assessed too high.
Action - Reduce to $26,000. M /Torgerson, S /Carls, Unanimous.
•
27. GRETA VOIGT - 431 School Road N. - bought for less than assessed.
Action - No Change. M /Carls, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
28. RON MCGRAW - 3 parcels - assessed too high.
Action - Assessor will review for action June 23.
is 29. BEV WANGERIN - 105 Judson Road W. - assessed too high.
Action - Assessor will review for action June 23.
30. GEORGE SWANSON - mobile home- assessed too high.
Action - Reduce by $1,000. M /Torgerson, S /Carla, Unanimous.
31. STEVE BARTON - 28 So. Main - assessed too high.
Action - No change. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unanimous.
32. ESTHER QUAST - 3 rental properties (letter received by county.)
Action - Assessor recommends lower assessments on 136 Hassan and 126
Hassan, no change on other property. M /Carla, S /Torgerson, Unanimous.
33. LEROY KUHL - (letter received by county.)
Action - Assessor recommends no change. M /Torgerson, S /Mikulecky, Unan.
34. NEIL JENSEN - 145 1st Ave. S.W. - assessed higher than purchase price.
Action - Assessor will review.
35. FERGUS ENTERPRISES - 2 parcels - assessed too high.
Action - Assessor will review.
Assessor's recommendation on any matters pending will be considered when the
Board of Review reconvenes on Tuesday, June 23, 1987.
• Assessor Emans suggested that, due to the increasing volume of requests in the
past few years, the City should consider appointing a special Board of Review
for the future.
The meeting was recessed at 9:30 p.m. to be reconvened on June 23.
M /Torgerson, S /Carls, Unanimous.
•
(612) 587 -5151
All-
37.V�S- iNGTC�`JAVE:UEWEST
_� —' hurc,v,tison. �r�r;v 5SS50
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 23, 1987
T0: — — — May sr—&-CityLQUTcii — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM: Water Billing Department
------------------------ - - - - --
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for June
------------------------ - - - - --
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water, sewer and refuse accounts
for the month of June. Recommend water service be discontinued on
Monday, June 29th, 1987 at Noon.
Percy Hanson
405 Adams St
Hutchinson MN 55350
125 Fifth Av NE
3- 075 - 0125 -042
136.39
cc:Larry Wendorff
Route 3
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 6/26/87
•
/ v .r
Les Strocklund
560 Brown St
Hutchinson MN
560 Brown St
1- 270 - 0560 -034
76.39
Mark Betker
626 Brown St
55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
626 Brown St
1- 270 - 0626 -053
56.08
Randy Mulligan
595 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
595 Franklin St S
1- 395 - 0595 -023
85.05
cc: Bonnie Westmiller
Citizens Bank
Hutchinson MN 55350
Charles Pearson
26 Grove St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
26 Grove St S
1- 455 - 0026 -081
83.23
Emily Quast
1321 SE 6th St
Minneapolis MN
325 Hassan St S
1- 480 -0325 -055
125.65
Dannheim Dairy
106 Erie St S
Hutchinson MN
106 Erie St
3- 380 - 0106 -072
28.54
cc:Gib Hammer
116 Erie St
Hutchinson MN
Andrew Ross
645 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
645 Franklin St S
1- 395 - 0645 -022
91.28
Ray Norton
127 Hassan St N
Hutchinson MN 55350
127 Hassan St N
1- 475 - 0127 -025
23.07
Promises 6/26/87
Gerald Elliott
206 Main St N
55414 Hutchinson Mn 55350
206 Main St N
1- 680 - 0206 -071
240.71
Midwest Trailer Ct
Box 157
55350 Winsted MN 55395
450 Water St
3- 970 - 0450 -051
4645.55
55350
LI
Arlene Otto
726 Brown St
Hutchinson MN 55350
726 Brown St
1- 270 - 0726 -041
98.14
Promises 7/02/87
Ricky Grant
115 Glen St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
115 Glen St S
1 -420- 0115 -027
46.01
cc: Loren Lickfelt
137 Garden Rd
Hutchinson MN
Kenneth Wornson
305 Hassan St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
305 Hassan St S
1- 480- 0305 -091
51.12
Alton Wicklund
605 Main St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
605 Main St S
1- 685 - 0605 -091
163.56
Midwest (Eldor Matthews)
Rt 3
Glencoe MN 55326
450 Water St
3- 970 - 0450 -052
807.67
•
(612) 587.5151
CITY Or HUTCHINS0N
37 W.ASHINGTGN AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1987
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 - Section 10.05
Pursuant to Section 6.06 C1, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request.
HISTORY
Building Official Jim Marka asked the Planning Commission to consider an
amendment to Zoning Ordinance #464, Section 10.05, Sec. C, Subsection (d)
PORTABLE SIGNS.
The public hearing was held on June 16, 1987 to consider amending Ordinance
#464, Section 10.05, as follows:
d) Portable Signs: May not be €4ash4ng; tome 44m4t net exeeed4ng th4rty J391
days; har4ng sixty f68l days tome span between permits: App44eat4en must be
94gned by owner of reeord to apply to one or mere adjaeent pareel.s-
Ma not be flashi_n�c�. Sin may not be 1p aced or extend over the front five
f t of an r_eoul%h se�ckin � district. Cannot be stone to a
p on ori�t TPo e•
Time limit not to exceed ninety (90) days, having a sixty (60) jal time span
etween permits
FINDINGS OF FACT
1
2.
3.
All procedural requirements for amendments to the zoning ordinance
have been complied with.
Notice was published in the _Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 4,
1987.
The proposal was deemed to be
the community.
RECOMMENDATION
appropriate and in the best interest of
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the revision of
Ordinance #464 Section 10.05 as listed above be approved.
Res lly submitted,
4�
��
Dr. Thomas Lyke, CW rman
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
M E M 0
DATE: April 29, 1987
TO: Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council ✓
FROM: Homer Pittman & Jim Marka
Bldg. /Zoning Dept.
RE: Proposed Portable Sign Ordinance
Please review the proposed changes in the Zoning Ordinance, Section 10:05
Sec. C, Subsection (d).
(d) Portable Signs - may not be flashing. Sign may not be placed or extend
over the front five (5) feet of any required setback in any district.
Cannot be fastened to any pylon or light pole.
Time limit not to exceed ninety (90) days, having a sixty (60) day time
span between permits.
Portable signs to remain longer than ninety (90) days, shall be
classified as ground signs, secured to a foundation and shall not
exceed the maximum allowable square feet per building front.
Your suggestions and input is appreciated.
Awe-r--�
Homer Pittman
Bldg. /Zoning Official
James Marka
Bldg. Inspector
E
•
HP /JM/pv 0
r
(612) 587.5151
®CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
MEMO
DATE: April 30th, 1987
TO: Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
FROM: Homer Pittman & Jim Marka
Bldg. /Zoning Dept.
RE: Proposed Portable Sign Ordinance
Upon approval of the Proposed Portable Sign Ordinance, enforcement of
existing non - conforming portable signs, will proceed as follows:
1) A copy of the new ordinance shall be mailed to property owners,
• requesting voluntary cooperation within thirty (30) days.
2) After thirty (30) days, a list of remaining non - conforming signs
shall be submitted to the City Council, City Administrator and
the City Attorney. The Building Official will again, by certified
mail, send a copy of the new ordinance citing specifics of
non - conformance.
3) After ten (10) days, the matter will be turned over to the City
Attorney for prosecution.
At this point in time, the following list represents existing non - conforming
signs:
Taco Johns
McDonald's
Mike's Mobil
Meade's 66 Station
Double D Western Wear
Gas N Grocery
Jonathon's
Kahle's
Minne- Sew -Ta -Vac Supply
Your suggestions and input is appreciated.
James Marka
Bldg. Inspector
Homer Pittman
Bldg. /Zoning Official
HP /JM /PV
•
�J
(612) 587 -5157
.'Anul CITY OF HUTCHINSON
i 37' ✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HU7C I NSON, MINN 5350
TO
FROM:
SUBJECT
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 17, 1987
Hutchinson City Council
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Request for Rezoning as Submitted by City Staff
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and
recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning.
HISTORY
At a Planning staff meeting on June 2, 1987, City Staff requested
to rezone property located on 1545 and 1555 Sibley Ave. in Fifth Addition to
Lakewood Terrace from R -5 (Mobile Home Park) to R -2 (Multiple family
residence) for the purpose of platting the property multiple family residence.
A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
Tuesday, June 16, 1986, at which time there was no one present who stated
their objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and site plan were submitted and the appropriate
fee was paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 4, 1987.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the request was
appropriate for the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request to rezone be granted.
Resp tfully submitted,
-Dr. Thomas Lyke , Cri 'irman
Hutchinson PlannineCommission
1 v %
/
r
of 4 I
■
7 �Y SFr Mp►�+• ...y+ ,, ry �� +�
`4�
°P •� 44 `7
s � o s���f vim.
p' '+oe 4 :�l e e
Q
42
P
e
P o •o 1l• , • (V •?
• : P 2 �Q
o
S
p vq. 3 d,
nrt
P
6 `• er ° • V e� , o
t o /t � •
P S
.urn
It r' � q� >r _._ _� q•, 37 i�
i
r)
1
n
U
•
•
ORDINANCE NO. 4/87
AN ORDINANCE AMEMING ORDINANCE NO. 464 CONCERNING
ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -5
Mobile Home Park to R -2 Multiple Family Residence.
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Fifth Addition to Lakewood Terrace,
City of Hutchinson
Adopted by the City Council this
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Clerk
day of , 1987.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
0
0
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT
'610 587 -5151
77 OF 'C47CHINS01V
Si IG-- TCN 'v U'E b ✓EST
ON, M;NN - -oc
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1987
Hutchinson City Council
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Variance Request as Submitted by William Backen, Farm & Home
Pursuant to Section 8.08 , of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance.
HISTORY
On May 27, 1987, William Backen submitted an application for a variance to
reduce the setback of 50' to 20' from an R (residential) zone for the purpose
of constructing a 40' X 90' addition to be used as a warehouse on the west
side of the present building located at Hwy. 15 South. A public hearing was
held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 16,
1987, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 4, 1987.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be
granted.
Resp tfully submitte ,
Dr. Thomas Lyke, Cha "irman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
RESOLUTION NO. 8563
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 8.08 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A WAREHOUSE
• 20' FROM AN R (RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
•
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. William Backen of Hutchinson has applied for a variance from
Section 8.08 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce the
setback of 50' to 20' from an R (residential) zone for the purpose of
constructing a 40' x 90' addition to be used as a warehouse on the west side
of the present building located at Hwy. 15 South., with the following legal
description:
Lot 2, Block 1, Hanson's Third Addition - City of Hutchinson
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a
variance and has recommended to the City Council that the application be
granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the
public safety, and the values of property in the surrounding area and the
effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adja-
cent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to
the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply
generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is
located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demon-
strable hardship or difficulty.
Q
l
Resolution No. 8563
Page 2
CONCLUSION •
The application for variance for the purpose designated is granted based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. P otz
City Administrator
Paul AcFTa—n—J
Mayor
•
0
(612) 587 -5151
C17 1 OF HUTCHINSON
37 vVA 3H!NG TON A VENUE WEST
h'L'7CWNSON, .MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 17, 1987
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit as requested by Andrew Ross
Pursuant to Section 6.05, C5, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recom-
mendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use
permit.
WItlim
On May 28, 1987, Andrew Ross submitted an application for a conditional use
permit to allow him to move and install a 24' x 28' garage on property located
on 645 So. Franklin St. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of
the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 16, 1987, at which time there was no
one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as
published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 4, 1987.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional
use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned
request for a conditional use permit be granted.
Res c fully submitted,
Z�J
Dr. Thomas Lyke, airman
Hutchinson Planning Commisson
9 E,
w
0
f
s
w4. LI
s
LQ I
M
W
r
w
D
n
'19 .
4
S
A
S
VJCCf r'1tPakt;a zTR4-',&T
L31 WO as
� hiOi�iC
LA
1 1
G*444C.
1 �
Aid se +4relc Olaf I
RyR
AL Le-y
a.R tt
G rtsc)
KocS t
IL 20 N'+
h, sT.etT
6 CL
11 11
u
a
1
RESOLUTION NO. 8562
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
. ALLOW MOVING AND INSTALLING A 24' X 28' GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT
645 S. FRANKLIN ST.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Andrew Ross, Hutchinson has made application to the City Council for
a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.03 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to
allow him to move and install a 24' x 28' garage on property located on 645 S.
Franklin St. with the following legal description:
Lot 6 Block 10 Bonniwell's 2nd Addition - City of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare
of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and
the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
• 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental
to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is
granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
Pau L. ck an
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. P otz
• City Administrator
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 2, 1987
TO: Planning Commission and C' ity Council
FROM: — Director—of Engineering
— ------------ — — — — — — — — — — - - — — —
SUBJECT: — FINAL PLAT—OF FIFTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE — — _ _ —
I hereby certify that the Final Plat of the of the Fifth Addition
to Lakewood Terrace complies with the requirements of the Subdivision
Ordinance regarding "Final Plat Procedure ".
•
EA /bb
n
4" I'Z-
Eugene Anderson
Director of Engineering
RESOLUTION NO. 8564
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT
OF FIFTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE
• WHEREAS, Loretta McDonald, owner and subdivider of the property
proposed to be platted as Fifth Addition to Lakewood Terrace has requested
approval of the final plat of said subdivision in the manner required for
platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan
and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota
and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, 'said plat is situated upon the following described lands in
McLeod County, to -wit;
That part of the South Half of Section 2, Township 116
North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal Meridian,
described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 2; thence
North 89 degrees 28 minutes 38 seconds West, assumed
bearing, along the south line of the Southeast Quarter of
said Section 2 a distance of 2625.65 feet; thence North a
distance of 1765.99 feet the the southeast corner of FOURTH
ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE, according to the recorded plat
• thereof,and the point of beginning of the land to be des-
cribed; thence northeasterly, easterly and northerly, along
the easterly line of said FOURTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD
TERRACE,to the northeast corner of Lot 6, Block 1, of said
FOURTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE; thence South 87 degrees
45 minutes 18 seconds East a distance of 330.61 feet; thence
South 2 degrees 14 minutes 42 seconds West a distance of
148.94 feet; thence South 87 degrees 45 minutes 18 seconds
East a distance of 9.35 feet; thence southeasterly a
distance of 125.187 feet along a tangential curve concave to
the southwest having a radius of 88.47 feet and central
angle of 81 degrees 04 minutes 245 seconds; thence South 6
degrees 40 minutes 54 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a
distance of 340.92 feet to the intersection with the
easterly extension of the north line of that parcel of land
which is described in Book 147 of Deeds on Page 509 in the
office of the County Recorder of McLeod County, Minnesota;
thence westerly, along said north line, a distance of 681.29
feet to the point of beginning.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That said plat of FIFTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE is hereby
approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws
• of the State of Minnesota, subject to the parks and playground contribution
being met and appropriate subdivision agreement being drawn up.
RESOLUTION NO. 8564
PAGE 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon
said plat by Mayor and City Clerk, as required, shall be conclusive showing of •
proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with
duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record
forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. P o z
City Administrator
Paul L. AcklanT
Mayor
•
r (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEIMORAN DUM
DATE: June 17, 1987
TG: Hutchinson—City Council
- - - - - — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FRCM: Hutchinson — Planning Comi — — ssion—
--- - - - -- m — — — — — — — — — — —
S!. JECT: Consideration of Lot Split of Lot 5 Block-1 and Lot 6 Rolling
-- -- ---------------
Oaks 5th Addition Requested by John Miller
• The Planning Commission recommends approval of the lot
split to City Council.
•
R- G
8
\ 3� , is � r�/ .a-i, � •:) L._ � -,, i '•r C.-
\ a. \S�• `p6,6i 56. — 4s.6� 4.21'02'23, N89'44'00 "E
109.89 1 ...- 240.00 --
C
.%0 ".65 7 3+L" 11 110.00 3p• 70.66 100.00 �� 39,2/ . _
I A.13•r46— I I r
+ r C• 70.49 �\
to
m m 0 O ARCEL A 0
m° 2 M° 3 00, 00 4 0 1 17 600 SO. FT. I0 W
_° D o iD
�
T O
N I In O �� — a0
a I pO
1p • N I Nl J N,
°c I N
Z ~
I— — 103.71 ---I I -- 100.00 - -1 IO- 100.00 --I I 100.00 — 110.00
—
•.7.' -- 405.71 -- --
N89.44.00'E PARCEL B to
6212 SO. FT.
o
IL
L I
o °'• % I
N y
AIk-
1w
•
•
(612} 587.5151
C;TY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON A VENUE WEST
HUMCHINSON, MINN. 55350
DATE: June 17, 1987
T0: —Hutchinson City Council— _ —
---- - - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FROM; —Hutchinson Planning Commission
— ----------------- — — — — — — — — — — —
�'„BS;ECT: — Consideration of Revised Sketch —Plan submitted by Roger_Siemsen
(Two mile radius)
Planning Commission recommends approval of the revised
sketch plan submitted by Roger Siemsen to the City Council.
q,#.
JA
LO
77,40 :WIIYIS!11-1! lo-PI
I N
•
•
u
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, June 16, 1987
1. Presentation by Larry Dallam of HNTB (7:00 p.m.)
Mr. Fred Hoisington, Pres. of Hoisington Group Inc., opened the
presentation by giving his background in the consulting business as being
primarily local assistance and Comprehensive planning. He explained that
the firm is process oriented and involves the public in planning.
Mr. Dallam commented also on some background of the company as well as
giving his background as a planner.
Discussion followed with questions as to timeline, dealing with the
community, implementation of the plan, etc.
Approximate fee would be $20,000 - $30,000, depending on the plan.
2. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas Lyke at 7:32 p.m. with
the following members present: Bruce Drahos, Spencer Beytien, Roland
Ebent, Marlin Torgerson, Larry Romo, Bill Craig and Chairman Lyke.
Members Also present: Building Official, Jim Marka and City Administrator,
Gary Plotz.
3. MINUTES
Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
dated Tuesday, May 19, 1987. Seconded by Mr. Beytien the motion
carried unanimously.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF AMMENDMENT OF PORTABLE SIGN ORDINANCE
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:33 p.m. with the reading of
publication #3702 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
June 4, 1987. The request is for considering an amment to
Zoning Ordinance #464, Section 10.05, Sec. C, Subsection (d)
PORTABLE SIGNS.
Mr. Romo made a motion to close the hearing. Seconded by Mr.
Torgerson the hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to
recommend approval to the City Council. Seconded by Mr. Drahos
the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -5 TO R -2 IN FIFTH ADDITION TO
LAKEWOOD TERRACE SUBMITTED BY STAFF
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7.35 p.m. with the reading
of publication #3703 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
6/16/87
Thursday, June 4, 1987. The request is by city staff for •
considering to rezone property located on 1545 and 1555 Sibley Ave.
from R -5 (Mobile Home Park) to R -2 (Multiple family residence) for
the purpose of platting the property multiple family residence.
Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Ebent the
hearing closed at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to
recommend approval to City Council with the recommendation of staff
to continue McDonald's Dr. through Sibley Ave. thus making that
street McDonald's Dr. Seconded by Mr. Orahos the motion carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE SUBMITTED BY WILLIAM BACKEN OF FARM AND HOME
DISTRIBUTING
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:40 pm. with the reading of
publication #3704 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
June 4, 1987. The request is for the purpose Coco isndering a
variance to allow the owner of Farm and Home to reduce the setback
of 50' to 20' from an R (residential) zone to construct a 40' x 90'
addition to be used as a warehouse on the west side of the present
building located at Hwy 15 South.
Discussion followed with favorable comments by commission members.
Mr. Backen commented on the construction and his talking with •
neighbors about the project.
Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Beytien
the hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to
recommend approval to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Romo the
motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITINAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ANDREW ROSS
Chairman Lyke opened the hearing at 7:45 pm. with the reading of
publication #3705 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday
June 4, 1987. The request is for the purposes considering a
conditional use permit to allow the owner to move and install a 24'
x 28' garage on property located on 645 So. Franklin St.
Some discussion followed as to the curb slope. Mr. Ross explained
that there would be a fill for slope.
Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the
hearing closed at 7:47 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend
approval to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion
carried unanimously.
5. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
2
•
PLANNING COMMISSION - MINUTES
6/16/87
• 6. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF FIFTH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE
SUBMITTED BY LORETTA MCDONALD AND STREET NAME CHANGE
There was discussion concerning the use of proper names for streets.
Building Official Marka was instructed to make suggestions to
property developers, in the future, on names that could be used.
Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat to
City Council provided that suggestions for street names be made by
staff. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT OF LOT 5 BLOCK 1 AND LOT 6 BLOCK 1
ROLLING OAKS 5TH ADDITION REQUESTED BY JOHN MILLER
Building Official Marka explained the reason Mr. Miller has for the
lot split.
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the lot split
to City Council. The motion was seconded by Mr. Beytien.
Discussion followed as to the legal de-scription of the properties
involved. City Administrator Plotz commented on the split and
• requirements that are needed to be met.
The motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROGER SIEMSEN (Two
mile radius)
Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend to City Council and the
Acoma Town Board no objection to the sketch plan. Seconded by Mr.
Romo the motion carried unanimously.
(d) DISCUSSION OF AMBASSADOR SIGNS
Building Official Marka explained the request by the Ambassadors to
put up a 10' by 14' "WELCOME TO HUTCHINSON" sign in Girl Scout Park
and another identical sign at the corner of Bluff St. and 4th Ave.
N. E.
Discussion followed as to the size of the signs. The matter will be
addressed by the Park and Recreation Board.
(e) PRESENTATION BY CONSULTING FIRMS ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
1) Mr. Dean Doyscher, Pres. of Professional Planners, commented on the
firm's traditional response to comprehensive planning. He explained
• his background and experiance with orderly annexation in similar
cities as Hutchinson.
3
MINUTES - HUTCHNISON PLANNING COMMISSION
6/16/87
He commented on the background of the firm siting many of the areas
of planning that his firm has done. •
Discussion followed as to implementation of the plan.
Approximate cost would be $14,000 not including the Water & Sewer
element or Parks and Recreation.
2) Mr. David Licht, Pres. of Northwest Associated Consultants,
explained the background of his firm commenting on their informal
atmosphere in working with the community involved. Mr. Licht, gave
background on the service of the firm and the consultants available
to work in Hutchinson.
Again there was discussion and comment by the planning commission
members as to timeline, implementation, etc.
Mr. Licht gave four options for fee schedules ranging from $7500 -
$22,500.
After the presentations City Administrator Plotz stated that there
would be two other firms making presentations at the July meeting.
Discussion followed as to the next steps to be taken in presenting
the project to the City Council. The consensus was to select the
top two firms after interviews and have their representatives give •
another presentation to the Council.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no futher business the meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
•
4
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
Hu7CHINSON. MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June S, 1987
TO: "eary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Ken Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: Eugene Anderson, Director of Engineering
RE: Purchase of Xerox Printing Machine
Please proceed with the purchase of the Xerox Engineering Copier per the
attached quotation. No other quotations are available because the machine
is a proprietary item. The attached memorandum provides justification for
the purchase. Also, attached is our estimate of savings by using the Xerox
Printer. Funds should be available from the Engineering Budget for salary
appropriation which evidently will not be expended.
Please present this item to the Council for consideration on June 23rd. If
additional information or documentation is needed from this department,
Please inform me the week of June 8th.
EA /pv
attachments
•
ELgenVIAUnerson
Director of Engineering
9�
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
JUNE 2, 1907
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO: GENE ANDERSON, CITY ENGINEER
-------------------------------- ------ ---- ----------- --- - - - - --
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
------------------------------------------ -- ---- -------- - -- - --
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY WAGES & COPY MACHINE
------------------------------- ---------- ------------ --- - - - ---
According to the latest records, not including this week's
payroll, $3,473.50 remains in the temporary wage line item of
your budget. With the two people you currently, have as temporary
I have estimated a total of B to 9 weeks of temporary wages.
A review of your second request for consideration of the
purchase of the copy machine made by Xerox. First, if at all
possible, a second quote on a similiar machine should be received
by your department. A second problem is the ability of your
budget to be adjusted to allow for such a purchase.
It sounds as if considerable savings could result with a
purchase of this machine. Each budget is very tight and looking
at the engineer budget it appears there is not a great deal of
room to make such adjustments. If the lease purchase plan were
implemented the 36 month with a 10% buy would be the best
alternative presented. $906 plus the cost of supplies would be
need from the budget. An area of you budget as a possible would
be the supplies line account 4210.
Out right purchase if possible is the best method if the
money can be found. One consideration, Gary sugguested, looking
at the wages budget since the city had anticipated Marlow
remaining on the job longer then was the actual case. With the
best estimate I have at this time we should have about $5,600
more than is necessary.
I hope this gives you the information you need to make your
decisions. If you are in need of further clarification let me
know.
C C Gary Plotz
1]
•
cJ-I,
FA
f
(612) 587.5151
HUTIH'j CITY OF HUTCHINSON
h M/NN. 553.50
M E M 0
DATE: May 28, 1987
TO: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Kenneth Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: Eugene Anderson, Director of Engineering
RE: Xerox Engineering Copier
Attached is a quotation for the Xerox engineering copier, which was recently
demonstrated. It is desirable to obtain this printer because $50.00 to $60.00
per month would be saved in paper costs, and the machine is highly versatile
because transparent originals (many of which we do not possess) are not needed
in order to obtain quality prints.
• The machine is presently available at a reduced price, about $500.00 below
regular price, because of a government contract. The least expensive option
for obtaining the machine is an outright purchase, but this was not included
in the engineering budget. The next cheapest alternative would be the 36
month lease. -
Please review this information and let me know the feasibility of obtaining
this printer. We would want to keep our diazo printer that we presently
have, because it would still be useful and the trade -in value is low.
EA /pv
attachments
•
EugendJAnderson
Director of Engineering
9 --
�
May 21, 1987
COPY EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED
1000 WEST 79TH STREET - MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55420
612/884 -3581
QUOTATION
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Attention: Gene Anderson
•
The Xerox 2510 Engineering Copier makes same size prints from
blueprints, vellums, and mylars onto your choice of bond paper,
vellum, erasable vellum, or mylar. No longer do you have to put up
with the terrible smell of ammonia, the 2510 does not use ammonia.
The 2510 will make copies 36 inches wide by any manageable length
for a fraction of the cost of a blue printer.
Thank you for the opportunity to quote as follows on behalf
of CEI:
1 - Xerox 2510 Engineering Copier
1 - Xerox 2510 Stand (optional)
1 - Xerox 2510 Start -up Package
c/w 2 -Ctg's toner (1 installed)
2- Fabric Guides (1 installed)
1 -Ctn. Developer (installed)
1 - Installation, Setup, and Training
1 - Freight Charge (factory to CEI)
$3,510.25 * •
449.00
406.00
N/C
108.00
The Xerox 2510 is warranted by Xerox for 90 days
4500 linear feet, whichever comes first.
CEI is an authorized 2510 dealer and provides
warranty and service maintenance.
XEROX 2510 PACKAGE
1 - Xerox 2510 Engineering opier with
Stand, Start -up Package, Installation,
Setup, Training, Media Sampler,
and Shipping /Handling $4,373.25
,t This price is predicated on a Xerox governmental
contract which expires July 1, 1987.
Delivery:
Above prices do not include applicable taxes.
This Quotation Effective:
Terrns:
q- T,
n1e��_Macnines naAQ [MJ — Supplies ciiovcvn.ir- — Instruments .... Encineenna
•
•
Delivery
Le'ri
Citv of Hutchinson
Page 2
May 21, 1987
COPY EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED
1000 WEST 79TH STREET - MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55420
612/884 -3581
QUOTATION
SAMPLE LEASE RATES
36 months with 10% buyout
60 months with $1.00 buyout
DIAZO MEDIA vs 2510 MEDIA
(based on suggested list prices)
Diazo Media /100 sheets
Blueprint Paper
18 x 24 $15.09
24 x 36 27.63
36 x 48 54.44
IF Sepia (N200E)
18 x 24 $ 47.27
24 x 36 94.50
34 x 44 172.31
Sepia Mylar (3 mil)
$ 151.32
131.21
2510 Media /100 sheets
Bond Paper
$ 7.40
$14.51
29.63
Vellum
$ 32.92
65.82
134.40
Erasable Vellum
13 x 24 $ 204.05 $ 59.08
24 { 36 408.10 118.85
34 x 44 858.20 213.00
Note: Erasable vellum can be used in place of sepia
mylar in most applications.
Stock
46 05 CEI & Factory
Above prices do not include applicable taxes.
DS /ja
This Quotation Effective:
Terms
Until factory increase
Net 30
Sy: Don Smith
DIAZO — Machines DRAFTING — Supolies SURVEYING — Instruments
Supplies Equipment Supplies
q —/
REPRODUCTION — Engineering
Xerox
Estimated Savings with Xerox Printer
Anticipated Cost Blue Print Paper - 1988
Anticipated Cost Mylar Sepia - 1988
Est. Savings - Blue Line to Bond 47%
Est. Savings - Sepia Mylar to Erasable Vellum 71%
6 -3 -1987
$ 600.00
$ 400.00
$1,000.00
1]
$ 282.00
$ 284.00 p
$ 566.00 5 S j
uN+ixJpp nn
mylath n,o u3ec c¢�4't
Xerox should eliminate need for approxi ately
80% of Blue Line and Sepia Mylar 566„Ctx 80% $ 452.00 Est. Savings Materials
Estimated Labor Savings - Plan Sheets
Est. 2 Draftsmen - 2 months ® 15% Time
692 Hours x 15% x $12.00 /Hour = $1,245.00 •
$1,697.00 Annual Est. Savings
11
(612) 587 -5151
XIM11, , CITY OF HUTCHINSON
3 7 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
u,L+TrHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 12, 1987
T0: -Mayor and City Council
PRCM: Director of Engineering
RE: Request to Confine a City Utility Easement
Several years ago, the City obtained a sewer easement that, according to its
description, encompassed Lot 35 of Lynn Addition in its entirety. Lot 35 was
subsequently subdivided into lots and blocks and rights -of -way by Zajicek's
Meadow Park Addition. Inplace City utilities lie on or immediately adjacent
to the described "centerline" of the easement, rendering other areas included
in the easement as superfluous. Development of the property and future
conveyances of excess easement areas can potentially be hindered because of
• the easement situation. We, therefore recommend, that the excess easement
area be vacated. The City Attorney has prepared an easement document that
would reduce the extent of the original easement to that which is needed for
operation and maintenance of existing utilities.
Concurrence of the Council is requested.
Both the sanitary sewer and the storm sewer lie beneath, or very near a
number of homes on and adjacent to the easement and it is advisable to
reconstruct the utilities within public right -of -way in the future.
EA /pv
\J
Respectfully submitted,
�.1
N "
Eugene derson
Director of Engineering
8
35'
n.
i
{L�Li pYS /CN. tl6 �1
Z AJICEK' S MEADOW P/
1951 11�PI't
a Ly Y11ri
�tsaw ave s
�, ac/icrna � _
4't
;evwn'i
led)
LYNN ADDITION
Redrawn from plat 1.11
r �
N � �
N �f
» 9
a I I
r
r
w
TO
TCHINSONI MINN.
1913
Last half of Sec. 1- 116 -30.
Plat made by order of County Aua,
from deeds on record in R"iater a.
Deeds office, County of MCI," . MN,
N \ .
r
N ` s
r M
•
l/1 r
M
�p O r
n
1 Y \ 1
M � • W
_ $ ' ♦ ' . N 1
»
B
t
Z •
lifts
1)
was w
i�
A lRy
$ r
�
q
c
�
•_
w a
A�
S J ;I
NN
r
a
DAVID B. ARNOLD
•CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MIGHA£L B. LEBANON
GARY D. MLDOWELL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
DANIELJ.BERENS
STEVEN S. HOGS
LAURA K. FRETLAND
CHARLES L NAIL, JR.
DAVID A. BRUEOGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEM£NI
June 17, 1987
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARR PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587 -7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Escrow Account Agreement
between City of Hutchinson
and Robert L. Carr
Our File No. 3188 -87 -0004
Dear Mr. Plotz:
5881 CEDAR LEE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53410
(612) 545 -6000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4645
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 386- 2214
714 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE. MINNESOTA 55338
(612) 864 -B1
AN 1987
RECEMM
sY____�
At your request, I have examined the Supplemental Agreement of
the Contract for the wastewater treatment facility which was
prepared by contractor Robert L. Carr Company and sent to the
City of Hutchinson for execution. Please note that this con-
tract is pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 15.73 Alternative
Form of Retainage which may be selected at the option of the con-
tractor. In case you are interested, I am enclosing a copy of
the statute as enacted in 1980. This statute was not amended by
the legislature in the most recent legislative session.
The Escrow Agreement as presented to this office is generally
acceptable with a few minor revisions and comments. Those revisions
and comments are as follows:
1. The first sentence of paragraph 1 of the Supplemental Agreement
should read as follows "In lieu of the procedures for handling
retained percentages set forth in payments provisions of the
contract, the Owner and the Contractor agree to the placement
in escrow with the above -named Escrow Agent, and pursuant
to the procedures set forth in this agreement, qualified securities
under Minnesota Statute Section 15.73 including notes or bonds of
• the United States of America or any State of the United States.
With the additions noted above, paragraph 1 is generally acceptable.
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
June 17, 1987
Page #2
�J
2. Paragraph 5 of the agreement contains a typographical error in
the second sentence. The second sentence should read "The
Contractor agree0s to supplement the escrow account if its
market value is less than the dollar amount that would be retained
by the Owner." Paragraph 7 also contains a typographical error
which is somewhat more, significant and the last clause of that
sentence should read "including default of or bankruptcy of
the Escrow Agent." There is also a typographical error in
Paragraph 11 which should be corrected (relinquished should be
relinquishes).
3. Note that the contractor is responsible for any compensation of
the escrow agent and the costs incurred by the escrow agent in
the operation of the escrow account. Paragraph 8 of this agreement
specifically provides that the costs and compensation of the agent
will be handled separately from the escrow account and will be
billed separately so that the municipality is not in any way
involved in the handling of the account.
The purpose of this Escrow Agreement is to provide that the contractor
may at least receive interest on the retainage provided for in the
original contract between Robert L. Carr and the City of Hutchinson.
Escrow accounts are typically used in large projects because the
dollars, in terms of interest lost, tend to be significant. You
will notice that the language of the statute under which this escrow
account agreement is drafted is mandatory; in other words, the con-
tractor at his option, may elect to use the form of retainage specified
in the agreement. Since the municipality has the right to make with-
holdings if the value of the escrow account declines and is not other-
wise supplemented, there appears to be adequate protection for the
municipality.
I recommend that the Council approve the Supplemental Agreement to
the contract for the wastewater treatment facilities with the changes
noted above. I believe the Council should have in its review a copy
of the agreement as drafted by Robert L. Carr Company, our correspondence
to your office and a copy of the statute.
If there are any questions, please advise.
y
N
G dry A dTrs
G
BA lm
CC Robert L. Carr Co.
Attn.: Steven A. Anderson
Donahue
Attn.: George McDonald
I to 15.57, a receiving
-es under the Intergov
gent with a federal age
Al or a portion of the I
i payments may be ma
: gency.
,loyees, any departmei
to industry may serve
nd interchange emplo
1969, Sections 197.455 to
to preference in employm
rvices, the provisions of a
it any ordinance or resolu
with the provisions of the
`omprehensive Employmm
pplicants under sections:
tent of the Persons spec
-icial or athlete who comps
dympic competition. `
member of a United Stall
Pan American, or Olympi
3mmittee, shall be granted
ghtsAffilthe purpose of pn
I thud leave under this;
rd competition combined
DEPARTMENTS OF STATE IN GENERAL ISM
d. 3. If the public employee granted the leave is an employee of a school
University system or other political subdivision, the state shall reimburse the
jr for the actual cost to the employer of employing a substitute.
� 1977 c 354 s 1; 1979 c 108 s 1; 1984 c 462 s 27; 1984 c 544 s 3; 1984 c 641
dt;IB.S c 17 s 1
D�NOpTRA
NCTS; SECURITY FOR COMPLETION OF PERFORM -
,division 1. For the purposes of sections 15.71 to 15.74 unless the context
edirates otherwise, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given
!. "Public contract" means any purchase, lease or sale by a public agency
property, public improvements or services, other than agreements which
ely for personal services.
1. "Public agency" or "public contracting agency" means any agency of the
mesota or any of its political subdivisions authorized by law to enter into
L 4. "Public improvement" means any construction of improvements on real
or highways by or for a public agency.
I. 5. "Retainage" means the difference between the amount earned by the
r on a public contract and the amount paid on the contract by the public
ng agency.
1980 c 464 s I
PROGRESS PAYMENTS ON PUBLIC CONTRACTS; RETAINAGE.
luMvision 1. Unless the terms of the contract provide otherwise, a public
acting agency shall make progress payments on a public contract for a public
mment monthly as the work progresses. Payments shall be based upon estimates
iAc completed as approved by the public contracting agency. A progress payment
not be considered acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defects
id. 2. A public contracting agency may reserve as retainage from any progress
t on a public contract for a public improvement an amount not to exceed five
of the payment. A public agency may reduce the amount of the retainage and
ninate retainage on any monthly contract payment if, in the agency's opinion,
k is progressing satisfactorily.
History: 1980 c 464 s 2
ALTERNATIVE FORM OF RETAINAGE.
Subdivision 1. At the option of the contractor, retainage shall be paid to the
actor in accordance with this section.
Subd. 2. The contractor may deposit bonds or securities with the public contract-
tgency or in any bank or trust company to be held in lieu of cash retainage for the
Ifit of the public contracting agency. In that event the public agency shall reduce
Mainage in an amount equal to the value of the bonds and securities and pay the
mat of the reduction to the contractor. Interest on the bonds or securities shall be
0* to the contractor as it accrues.
Subd. 3. Bonds and securities deposited or acquired in lieu of retainage, as
pitted by subdivision 2, shall be of a character approved by the state treasurer,
nding but not limited to:
(a) Bills, certificates, notes or bonds of the United States;
(b) Other obligations of the United States or its agencies;
(c) Obligations of any corporation wholly owned by the federal government; or
q —K
0
15.73 DEPARTMENTS OF SPATE IN GENERAL 340
1
(Renumbered 13.8
(d) Indebtedness of the Federal National Mortgage Association.
[Renumbered 13.8
Subd. 4. If the public agency incurs additional costs as a result of the exercise of
[Renumbered 13...
the option described in this section, the agency may recover the costs from. the
contractor by reducing the final payment due under the contract. As work on the
[Renumbered 13.5
contract progresses, the agency shall, upon demand, inform the contractor of all
[Renumbered 13.7
accrued costs.
5
[Renumbered 13.5
History: 1980 c 464 s J
15811
[Renumbered 13.5
15.74 EXCEPTIONS TO APPLICATION.
Sections 15.71 to 15.73 apply to all public contracts except those contracts in which;
receipt of federal financing is conditioned on adherence to terms and conditions which
are inconsistent with sections 15.71 to 15.73.
4
History: 1980 c 464 s 4
15.771 [Renumbered 13.69, subdivision 1]
15.772 [Renumbered 13.45]
15.773 [Renumbered 13.36]
15.774 (Renumbered 13.57]
15.775 [Renumbered 13.391
±:
15.776 [Renumbered 13.801
15.777 [Renumbered 13.83]
15.778 [Renumbered 13.73]
15.779 [Renumbered 13.70, subd. 2]
t"
•
15.781 [Renumbered 13.41]
15.782 [Renumbered 13.531
15.783 [Renumbered 13.311
15.784 [Renumbered 13.51]
15.785 [Renumbered 13.381
15.786 [Renumbered 13.54]
15.787 [Renumbered 13.66]
15.788 [Renumbered 13.67]
15.789 [Renumbered 13.65]
15.791 Subdivision 1. [Renumbered 13.82, subdivision 1]
Subd. 2. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 21
Subd. 3. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 3]
Subd. 4. (Renumbered 13.82, subd. 41
Subd. 5. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 5]
Subd. 6. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 7]
Subd. 7. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 8]
Subd. 8. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 91
Subd. 9. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. 101
Subd. 10. [Renumbered 13.82, subd. I I]
15.792 [Renumbered 13.69, subd. 21
15.793 EXTENSION OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY CLASSIFICATIONS.
( .
Court services data, criminal history data, and corrections and detention data
classified by temporary classifications granted prior to January 1, 1981, pursuant to
section 13.06, shall retain their temporary classification until July 1, 1982.
•
History: 1981 c 311 s 38.39; 1982 c 545 s 24
0
C, yy a 4' &t A,,so,.
Letter,
Donohue
7200 Hemlock Lane N. Maple Grove, MN 55369
612- 425 -2181
S u b i e c t •' L C =rr L ScrJ. -.�
_y •D r,.VD
MESSAGE
Tn �c•/ -e 1 s cro
7 not
�Oropos�re..o
1 7 �¢ O ,
Date Signed
•
Date .�i -07% 87 Signed
REPLY
A
Date Signed
•
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL P. L[HARON
GARY D. NCDOWELL
FAME KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON
DAN I£LJ. BERENS
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA R. FRETLAND
CHARLES L. NAIL, JR.
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
May 20, 1987
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTGH/NSON,MINNESOTA 55350
(e12) 567 -7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. George MacDonald
Donohue & Associates
P.O. Box 699
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Escrow Agreement
Our File No. 3188 -87 -0004
Dear Mr. MacDonald:
I have received for review an Escrow Account
the City of Hutchinson and Robert L. Carr Co.
has just now arrived at our office and we are
of reviewing it.
5861 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(a 12)545 -6000
MN TOLL FREE 800 -340 14545 •
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(012) 386 -2214
714 TENTH STREET PAST
GLENCOE. MINNESOTA 55308
(812)884.0111
Agreement between •
This Agreement
in the process
From the standpoint of state and /or federal funding of this
wastewater treatment facility, is there any particular reason
why the Escrow Agreement is inappropriate?
We hope to have completed our review of the draft Escrow Agreement
within the next week or so. If you have any questions or problems
in connection with the foregoing, please contact me.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
1l L
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
CC Gary Plotz
Steven A. Anderson - Robert L. Carr Co.
v e
1�
9-h
(612) 587 -5151
. /��// C /TY OF HUTCH/NSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHlNSON, MlNN. 55350
DATE: June 18, 1987
TO: City Council Members
FROM: Mayor
SUBJECT: Merit Increase for City Admin.
Councilman Mike Carls and I have completed a performance review of City
• Administrator Gary Plotz. At this time I would like to recommend a 2%
merit increase effective his anniversary date with the City of Hutchinson.
•
(612) 587 -5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
Jame 19, 1987
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: HAZEL SITL, PERSONNEL
11
r+ ia• • a�• is u • �' Tau' i� • r •+ a�•
1. Department heads have made rearam-ndations for merit adjustments
for the second three months of 1987, as listed below.
FIIUNCE by Kenn Merrill ADMINISTRATION by Gary Plotz
Diane Swanson, Receptionist 4% Ralph Neumann 2%
(see memo attached)
TRANSIT by Hazel Sitz
Harriet SciYnidt, Dispatcher 4%
POLICE by Ron Kirchoff
Lori Adamietz, Dispatcher 28
KUNTENANCE by Ralph Neumann
Eldon Rarkeim, Street Maint.
1%
Earl Alsleben, Street Maint.
1%
Phil Forcier, Custodian ,
2%
Henry Heinecke, Wastewater Op.
4%
Merle Meece, Wastewater Tech.
2%
2. In addition, the review committee rends that a grade change
be made at this time for Larry Karg (anniversary in June) because of
the additional responsibilities he will assume in the street department
on the retirement of Ralph Neumann. it is recommended his position of
street supervisor be changed from Grade X to Grade XI, with a 57C/hr
pay adjustment (about 4.8 %). This would be the same grade and rate as
the other supervisory position in that department (motor pool supervisor.)
3. In addition, Police Chief Ron Kirchoff has requested that police department
employee Roger Bakken be granted a 2% merit adjustment at this time, rather
than later in the year when his anniversary occurs. As per memos from the
police department ( attached) Roger has been providing assistance to the
licensed officers to a great extent, in addition to his CSO duties. (The
chief is not requesting a grade change at this time.)
40
•
•
(612) 587.5151
F CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
June 18, 1987
MEMORANDUM
FROM: GARY PIOrZ
9 la J - 1 101' �}
The anniversary date for consideration cal Ralph.Netimiann's performance/
merit review is 4 -1 -87. 1 reoantwxd a 28 adjustment.
Although this would amount to a relatively small amount of money
(4 -1 -87 to 7 -1 -87) the adjustment would be helpful in calculating
his pERA; plus provide a favorable gesture of appreciation for
past performance.
0
0
3 - _zq
CJ
HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
TO
FROM
Chief Ron Kirchoff
t. John C. Gregor
SUBJECT CSO Roger Bakken
DATE 6 -3 -87
Community Service Officer Roger Gakken is currently being used extensively in
his capacity as a part time Police Officer.
Due to the recent resignation of the Chief of Police, adjustments had to be made
in the Sgts. schedule, which left gaps in the coverage. Roger has been utilized
to fill these gaps.
Officer Bakken is currently working 1 or 2 8-hour shifts a week as a part time
Police Officer. Be also is working an average of 10 to 20 hours per pay period
covering night shifts for full time officers taking vacation or comp time.
Because of the added responsibility placed on Officer Bakken, because of his
part time Police Officer duties and his CSO duties, it is felt that a pay adjustment
is warranted.
By using Officer Bakken in a dual role of CSO and part time Police Officer on
day shift, the City is saving approximately $48 a day.
9 -z
i
HUTCHINSON POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM
DATE June 15, 1987
• TO Gary Plotz and Hazel Sitz �j
FROM Ron Kirchoff Al
SUBJECT Merit Review for CSO Roger Bakken
Gary,
As a result Dean O'Borsky's resignation from the Police Department,
Community Officer Roger Bakken has had to play a dual role, enabling the
Department to function efficiently. By job description Roger Bakken does
a fine job in the Community Service field in the Police Department. However,
he is now being utilized to fill shifts that have been vacated in order that
we have continued coverage throught 1987. I am enclosing a memo written to
myself from scheduling Officer Sgt. Gregor, relating Officer Bakkens responsi-
bility to the Police Department. As the memo vividly points out, by utilizing
the vital services of Roger Bakken (Who is a licensed full time Policeman)
the City has a savings of $48 a day. What the memo does not reflect is the
fact that Roger is willing to work extra shifts and while working those shifts
emplifies professionalism that people of Hutchinson have come to know in their
Police Department. I am requesting a pay adjustment for Officer Bakken.
His adjustment would be from $8.87 to $9.05. The pay adjustment be granted
on the grounds that Roger is doing the majority of his hours as a licensed
• full time Policeman while continuing to perform the duties of the Community
Service Officer. Roger's shifts are no longer a straight day shift, but they
fluctuate as a need be basis. I would you appreciate any comments you have to
make prior to submitting this to the Hutchinson City Council.
Respectfully,
R. Kirchoff
C�
is
•
r (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
JUNE 16. 1987
TO: MAYOR a CITY COUNCIL
FROM: k:EN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
--------------- ---- ---------- - - - - --
SUBJECT: INTEREST RATES ON r=iSSESSEMENT ROLLS ADOPTED IN 1987
------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
The attached resolution, I believe, changes the interest rate on
the previously adopted assessement. rolls. Previously adopted
interest rates of 7% will be ajusted to the 6.63% rate. This is
the net interesL rate for 1987 improvement bonds.
RESOLUTION NO. 8561
RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE
FOR ASSESSEMENT ROLLS ADOPTED IN 1987
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That all assessement rolls which have been adopted are
hearby changed to read an interest rate of 6.63 %. This rate is
the net interest rate of the 1987 improvement bonds.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June 1987.
ATTEST:
Gary D. P otz
City Administrator
9
Paul A. Ack an .
Mayor
•
y-r��
(612) 587 -5151
Hurry' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 17th, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Engineering Dept.
RE: Assessment Roll No. 234 - Letting No. 15
Project No. 87 -33 8 87 -34
Bid Opening on the above- referenced project was held on June 8th, 1987, and
one bid was received from Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson, Minnesota.
An Assessment Roll has been prepared in accordance with said bid, and we
request approval of said Assessment Roll and set hearing date of July 14th,
1987 at 8:00 P.M. Resolutions are attached.
CR /pv
attachments
•
6 e�
Cal Rice
Asst. City Engineer
9 -�
RESOLUTION NO. 8557
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND •
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 234
LETTING NO. 15
PROJECT N0. 87 -33 & 87 -34
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Shady Ridge Road
from T.H. 7 to the South Line of Hilltop Addition and Connecticut Street and
West Wood Road in Sunset Ridge Addition, in accordance with the Final Plat, by
the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Sewer and Water
Services, Grading, Aggregate Base and Appurtenances, and the bid price for
such improvement is $89,894.75, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in
the making of such improvement amount to $19,776.85, so that the total cost of
the improvement will be $109,776.85.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $0.21, and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefited property owners is declared to be $109,671.39.
2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, shall •
forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such
improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the
district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
inspection.
3. The Clerk shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment,
notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
/ —A'
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
• RESOLUTION NO. 8558
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 234
LETTING NO. 15
PROJECT NO. 87 -33 A 87 -34
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 23rd day of June,
1987, the City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost
of improving Shady Ridge Road from T.H. 7 to the South Line of Hilltop
Addition and Connecticut Street and West Wood Road in Sunset Ridge Addition,
in accordance with the Final Plat, by the construction of Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain, Storm Sewer, Sewer and Water Services, Grading, Aggregate Base and
Appurtenances,
AND WHEREAS, the Clerk, has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 14th day of July, 1987, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and
at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
assessment.
• 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on
the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at
least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the
total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given
to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two
weeks prior to the hearings.
Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
City Administrator
•
Mayor
R=
PROJECT NO. 87 -33 4 87 -34
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, SIIWP.M & WATER
SERVICES, GRADING, AGGREGA1'1: EASE 6 APPIIRTIiNANCES
SERVICE LEAD 1
NO. Y09. SPREAD I lU
UNIT USED I P11( LOI' /SQUARI: 10U1'
'I BOLL
, 1D9 SHAD; RIDGE KUM o DUnlr, wun J: AUUIIIUa
ACCT. PARCMI.
MAME A ADDRESS ADDITION OR
1PRONTAGE
SERVICE
TOTAL
3UBDIVI31ON
LOT
BLOCK
LINE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
l 260.0010
Tenpart Company
c/o Dave Theis
Box 99
-3 -1 -
5 3 0 T rt Addition
1
1
43 500
2,201.10
2 60.00
Tenpart Company
c/o Dave Theis
Box 99
35- 117- 30 -16- 182
Hutchinson MN 55350 Ten art Addition
3
1
31.246
1.,81.0s
016.1400
Prairie House, Inc.
126 Franklin St. No.
Box 572 Part of SW 1/4 SW 1/4
36-117-30-13-0260
Hutchinson. MN 55350 Sec, 36-117-30
59,830
3,027.40
4 036.1400
David Lilja
c/o Henry Ewald
22S Shady Ridge Road Part of SW 1/4 SW 1/4
36-117-30-13-0270
7_
1,898.Z7_
5 016.1700
Elva Nojahn
255 Shady Ridge Road Tract in SW 1/4 200' x 193.731
6
Kevin R. & Carolyn F. Compton
John C. & Nandi C. Kruse
Melvin & Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35-117-30-16-0 0
3,909.63
7
Kevin R. & Carolyn F. Compton
john C. & W.-di C. Kruse
Melvin & Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
3,969.63
35417 -30 -16 -0400
H
„a....
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
• •
OaewPatN hl F.R, S PROJECT
NATRA N0. p -33 4 87 -34
pmaWN ft �.t:FP$Q�N _. SANITARY SINNER, NATBRNAI N, /TOWN SNMI:N, SRWII TUN
SERVICES, GRADING, AGGREGATE. BASE. 8 APPURTE - ES
IS
SERVICE LEAD 1_ __, •
NO. INS. SPREAD a
UNIT USED 1 PIiR CUT /:i4UNtl. CWI'
ROIJ
234 SHADY RIDGE ROAD 8 SUNSET RIDGE ADDITION
FARM
NAME A ADDRESS ADDITION OR
SERVICE
TOTAL
SUBDIVISION
E
GE
LINE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
ev n aro yn omp on
.John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin 8 Celia Ziemer
IS
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0410
Hutchinson, 1N 55350 Sunset Ridge Addition
3
1
3,90.63
Kevin R. 8 Carolyn P. Compton
.John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin 6 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0420
4
1
3969.63
0
Kevin R. 8 Carolyn F. Compton
John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
k lvin 8 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0430
t
S
1
3.969.03
11
Kevin R. 8 Carolyn F. Compton
John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
telvin 8 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0440
6
1
Kevin R. 8 Carolyn F. Compton
ohn C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
]vin 8 Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
evin R. g Carolyn F. Compton
3,1W9,63
13
John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
elvin 4 Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
35-117-30-16-046
iutch' on !N 55350 Smset Rid..
14
evin R. 8 Carolyn F. Compton
John C. fi Wendi C. Kruse
elvin 8 Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0470
lutchi nson MN 55350 Sunset Ridge Addition
I
3 'turn 63
Total Princt Pal...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
Dwelled t MASON -LETTING -NO. is - COST PER UNIT 153.969.631VI.u504
ORRRmtA pI PROJECT NO, 67 -33 6 E7 -34 SERVICE LEAD I
AaeNN pt ANDERSON SANITARY NOR, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWP.R, SEWER 6 WATER No. YRS. SPASM I �
SERVICES, GRADING AGGREGATE RASE 4 APPURTENANCES UNIT USED I OR CUT /SUIJAR1. I W1
aes uwmn r anji rn_ 234 SHADY RIDGE i&AD— S SUNSET RIDGE ADDITION
Sunset Ridge Addition
4
F7 i1
f- i1
Total Princlpw ...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
f•h rrl 3 ul:.
969.63
• • •
.John C. 6 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin 6 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
3S-117-30-16-0480
Hutchinson, MN SS350
Kevin R. 6 Carolyn F. Com
.John C. 6 Nandi C. Kruse
Melvin 6 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0490
Tr-
Kevin R. 6 Caro yo CoR
John C. 6 Nandi C. Kruse
elvin 6 Celia Ziemer
S20 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0500
IR
Kevin R. 6 Carolyn F. Con
John C. 6 Wendi C. Kruse
e lvin 6 Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
- 17- -1
IN 55350
Iy
Ravin R. 6 Carolyn F. Cos
ohn C. F, Wendi C. Kruse
Ivin 6 Celia Ziemer
tc_ 117 -30 -16 -020
520 School Road No.
20
evin R. 6 Carolyn F. Ca
ohn C. 6 Nandi C. Kruse
eivin 6 Cella Ziemer
20 School Road No.
_1 7- -1 -
utchinson. MN SS350
21
evin R. 6 Carolyn F. Col
ohn C. 6 Nandi C. Kruse
elvin 6 Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
Sunset Ridge Addition
4
F7 i1
f- i1
Total Princlpw ...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
f•h rrl 3 ul:.
969.63
• • •
cimeted or PROJBCT• NO. v47-33.6 37 -34
AeeYW MI SANITARY SEVER, WATION AIN, $TORN SEWER, SEWER OUR
SERVICES, CRADINGI AGGREGATE SASE S APPURTENANCES
Shcct 4 of 5
ST CSR UNIT 1 511, 115 U6 •
SERVICE LOAD 1
00. TRS. SPARAD 1 10
UNIT USED a PER LMSOUARL I WT
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
I ++ i1NU7 R11NC r A SUNSET RIDGE ADDITION
RAMS A ADDRESS AOBIT OR
SBRviC6
TOTAL
B
LIMB
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
2
ev n ro yn Compton
.John C. 8 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin A Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
35- 117 -30 -16 -0550
Hutchinson, M! 55350 Sunset Ridge Addition
9
2
S 3,91.7.63
Kevin R. A Carolyn P. Compton
.John C. A Wandi C. Kruse
Melvin A Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
16 -0560
in
2
24
Kevin R. A Carolyn Campton
John C. A Wendi C. Kruse
lelvin A Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
16 -0570
11
2
Kevin R. A Carolyn P. Compton
ohn C. A Wendi C. Kruse
Ivin A Celia Ziemer
520 School Road No.
16 -0580
Additinn
evin R. A Carolyn F. Compton
12
2
d76
ohn C. A Wendi C. Kruse
lvin A Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
-OS 0
13
2
16
evin R. A Carolyn F. Campton
ohn C. 6 Wendi C. Kruse
eevin A Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
16 -0600
urchin on 5535
14
2
,
evin R. A Carolyn P. Compton
ohn C. A Wendi C. Kruse
Ivin A Celia Ziemer
20 School Road No.
-16 -0610
utchinson MN 55350 Sunset Ri a Addition
i5
2
3 969 3
Total Principal...
Total Interest....
Grand Totals......
PROJECT N0. 57 -33 4 87 -34 SERVICS LRAD I
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, SEWUR 4 WATER NO. YRS. SPRSAD 1 10
SERVIC89P GRADINGi AGGRNGATE_SASE 4 APPURTENANCES UNIT USSD I PER 10'1 1SQUARE iU0'1
ROLL N
.
M ADDRESS AUDI I N
SERVICE
TOTAL
ACCT. PARCH.
so, go,
or OWNER SUBDIVISION
LOT
BLOCK
FRONTAGE
LIKE COST
LEAD COST
CREDITS
ASSESSMENT
t9
Kevin R. A Carolyn P. Compton
John C. 4 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin 4 Celia Ziemer
520 School Raod No.
7_
d ii on
1
2
3.969.63
S0
ev n aro yn Compton
John C. 4 Wendi C. Kruse
Melvin 4 Celia Ziemer
35-117-30-16-0630
520 School Road No.
Hutchinson, onset Ridge dit
17
2
3,969.63
City of Hutchinson
QLIL
T.Jn1 enlnnlnal...
t Ino_671.6n
Construction Cost $ 59,594.75 ' -- -- Interes'
t....
City Cast (22%) • $ 19 776.55 Total
Total Cost 109.671.60
Grand Totals......
• • •
nutcriinson
community
1095 Highway 15 South, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 • Telephone 6121587 -2148 "An Equal Opportunity Employer'
June 19, 1987
The Honorable Mayor
Hutchinson City
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Paul Ackland and
Council Members
West
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members:
The Hospital Board, at their last two meetings, considered certain
capital expenditure requests from staff. Following discussion, the
Hospital Board is requesting your authority to proceed with these items
which will cost us in excess of $10,000. The items are as follows:
Office Pool Remodeling. Graves led the group through an
• area adjacent to the Medical Center, in the Medical Office
Building, which is being considered for remodeling into office
space needed for hospital employees. Funds for remodeling of
this area had been budgeted when the area was previously being
considered for expansion of the Radiology Department; however,
due to the undesirable distance from the present Radiology area,
the funds will now be used for needed office space. Following
discussion:
Motion was made by Bretzke, seconded by Durfee, to
request approval from the City Council to remodel
the office pool area at an approximate cost of
$25,000. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Incinerator Replacement. A capital expenditure request for
purchase and installation of a new incinerator for the hospital
was presented. A second burner was installed in the present
incinerator several years ago; however, the incinerator is in
need of replacement because it is disintegrating. Cost of a
replacement incinerator was estimated at $10,000- $15,000.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Bretzke, to
request approval from the City Council for purchase
and installation of a new incinerator for the hospital.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
•
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland
and Hutchinson City Council Members
June 19, 1987
Page Two
Purchase of Critical Care Beds. A request for purchase of five
critical care beds was received by the Hospital Board. The present
system has regular electric beds that have certain limitations
for function in this unit. The proposed beds will have the ability
to be x -rayed through for pacemaker insertion and use of the C -Arm.
They also have built -in scalesin order to weigh critical patients
without moving them to an ancillary scale with a sling. The new
beds also have the ability to be used as transport litters and have
certain attachments to house equipment if the patient has to be
moved to another destination within the hospital, as well as
certain responsive features for instant CPR. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Johnson, to request
approval from the City Council to purchase five critical care
beds at a cost of approximately $6500 per bed. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
Thank you, in advance, for your consideration of the above- requested
purchases. I will be available at the Council meeting to answer any
questions or concerns you have regarding these expenditures.
Sincerely,
AQ CHINSON COMM IT S ITAL
Philip G. ayes
Administrat r
WMI1
•
•
•
CJ
I�An ,. 1\mhaE.n
P...un.e Dineen
Ihcl 147 751A)
Pk-',
Cie AJlmm�vmnr
Ihcl 1925151
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Pr,, Anhu, L C—,,
Pr idenl
tir,l halinnal Bank
,9.. P— I A. IBU,n Burirh
E, V . 011rcm
Bank and Tru.1 G..
Se,. Tr,— Churl B. Piehl
Cvm(N fthl � Aan.
Pann,r. D.W,nn
Pc¢rwn k Co.
Tnm Da @Fen
V P.. (Bharat Manager
H.,h, —n Ml, d .Ale, Inn.
Donald A. Gls
Pr.,. RnDw FNcrul
Sun ing. 6 Lun Ant n
Glenn Magika
Su P1. ul Sa M1�4A.
Dnma1 42,
R.,.Ad I- McGraw
Allnrne, a1 Law
n
LJ
Hutchinson Community Development Corp. \
45 Washington Ave. East
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Jute 18, 1987
TO: Mayor Paul Acclund & City Council Members
FROM: TA (Buzz) Burtch, HCDC President
SUBJECT: City Council & HCDC Special Council Medingmarkshop
The Board of Directors of the Hutchinson Community Development Corporation
would like to set up a Special Ca incil Meeting/Workshop with the City Council.
our g Ts s fa have an ongoing communication with the City Council as to
moot effective way of promoting the community. It has been sane time since
we had an informal session to do this.
We feel there are a number of items in need of review, information exchange, etc.
Several of the items would be a general review of activities, showing of our new
VCR tape promoting the city, our row fact folder, proposed uses for the revolving
loan fund, a Small Cities Development Program grant application and other items
as may be timely.
One of the items of discussion would be a methodology In getting cittaen
participation of their ideas as to what our communities strong and weak points are.
+ With this imput we feel we will be in a better position to develop our future goals
and strategies on behalf of the community of Hutchinson.
Another item for discussion would be the potential to have gly Council Members
( one or two) as board members. Oery Plots and John Bernhagen could work out the
details to offer maximum per hcipation.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
cc: Oary Plotz
UPDATE FOR OBJECTIVES IN 1987
JUNE 18, 1987
•
1.
Police Station
Vergil Florhaug (CAM) on June 8, 1987 esti-
Bidding, Construc-
mated construction to begin July 1, 1987; sub -
tion Implementation
contract should be available to execute by the
Council meeting of June 23, 1987.
2.
Compilation of
Marlow Priebe has complied an updated list -
City Engineer's
ing of deferred assessments; the listing was
Information On
provided to the City Attorney to determine how
Deferred Assess-
to proceed.
ments
3.
Consideration of
The second opinion on the airport appraisals
Second Opinion On
(primarily appraisals) was completed. Barry
Airport Appraisals
Anderson is making the recommendation on how
to proceed from this point.
4.
Evaluation of
Sewer and water charges will not be evaluated
Sewer /Water Charges
until the fourth quarter of the year.
5.
Consideration of
The Mayor and I have met with Barry Anderson
Alternatives to Copper
on this objective. Barry Anderson is in
Study Report
charge of resolving this dispute.
•
Marlow was unable to work on this objective
with the many improvement projects going on
this summer. I anticipate Gene Anderson not
reviewing this until the fourth quarter.
6.
Community Input
The community input survey will be completed
Solicitation
by the end of September unless we go into a
(Budgeted for 1987)
calendar format (1988 calendar) for distribu-
tion in the fourth quarter (December).
7.
Resolution of Parking
The Mayor and I have met with Barry Anderson
Appeals
and have stressed this is top priority for
the City Attorney, along with the airport
item No. 3.
8.
Review of Liquor Store
The liquor store layout renovation was re-
Interior Layout And
viewed, specifically expansion. I believe
Potential Renovation
Chuck Nelson has no plans to propose anything
more at this time. A small modification has
been made with the additional cooler space.
9.
Council Review of
The League of Minnesota Cities has completed
Proposed City Charter
its review of the proposed revision and the
And Potential Referendum
Charter Commission is scheduled to certify
•
the document at a June 23 Charter Commission
17. Hold Workshop With HCDC The request for the City Council /HCDC meeting
For Current Update And is in your packet under 10 -(a).
1987 Organizational
Objectives
18. Hold Workshop With Mission accomplished.
Hutchinson Utilities
Commission for Current
Update And 1987 Organiza-
tional Objectives
C�
•
r�
U
meeting. I anticipate the item being on the
July 14 Council agenda to determine "how" and
"when" to proceed with the process.
10.
Wastewater Treatment
The project at this time is four to five
Plant Bid Award And
weeks ahead of schedule. This is the No. 1
Implementation, Includ-
priority in my mind.
ing Forcemain Easements
11.
Consider An Industrial
Hutchinson Technology is currently employing
Development Area /Park
a consultant to review expansion alterna-
Adjacent to Hutchinson
tives. Gene, Homer, Jim, George and myself
Technology, Plan Im-
have met with the key individuals. You will
provements
be hearing more this fall on specific devel-
opment plans (annexation, etc.).
12.
Implement Energy Council's
The Energy Council has made no loan(s); how -
Goals & Objectives, Includ-
ever, the objectives of the Council (energy
ing Revolving Loan Fund
audits) are well under way, and the second
grant application has been submitted.
13.
Sprinkling Downtown
I met with the officers of the Fire Depart -
Building Basements
ment plus George Field. It was decided to
Over 1500 Square Feet,
delay this objective until the fourth quar-
Coordinated with Loan
ter or until the City Engineer reviews alter -
Program
natives to the copper problem in the downtown
water system.
14.
Implement Auditor's
Some of the additional cash reporting and
Recommendation On
control measures have gone into effect. A
Additional Cash
separate report will be submitted to the
Reporting /Control
Council detailing this implementation.
15.
Establish A Revised
A substantial portion of the organization
Organizational Chart
chart was revised at the June 8 Council meet -
to Represent Current
ing which define several new relationships
Thinking On Account-
between engineering, streets, water, and
ability
wastewater. The balance of the chart will be
completed after the Charter referendum.
16.
Revise And Add to City
This is an ongoing activity.
Procedure /Policy Handbook
17. Hold Workshop With HCDC The request for the City Council /HCDC meeting
For Current Update And is in your packet under 10 -(a).
1987 Organizational
Objectives
18. Hold Workshop With Mission accomplished.
Hutchinson Utilities
Commission for Current
Update And 1987 Organiza-
tional Objectives
C�
•
r�
U
19. Council Decision On
Drainage Problems On
5th Ave. NE, Maplewood
• East (Lateral), And Kay
Street Areas
•
•
Projects appear to have been dropped as a
result of public hearings.
20. Hold Workshop On Disaster One meeting has been held. I have not heard
Planning with City Council, of any more planning activity in this area.
Safety Council, Civil De-
fense Officials, And Local
Industry
21. Hold Workshop With Police No workshop has been held.
With Police Department On
How Juvenille Crime Preven-
tion Program Could Be
Expanded
22. Decide On Selection Process Mission accomplished.
For New City Engineer, Etc.
23. Decide On Voting Machines voting machines were examined from another
And /Or Alternatives For community. It was determined the used ma-
Implementation Of System chines were not the same model and operated
In 1987 somewhat differently. Therefore, the Finance
director is looking at different alterna-
tives.
24. Hold Or Reduce Mill Levy This is a budgeted objective for the third
quarter.
25. Review Assessment Search We need to schedule a workshop on this and a
Form few other topics (airport appraisals and
parking assessment report by City Attorney).
(612) 587.5151
HUTCH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON MINN 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 23, 1987
T0: Mayor $ City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Traffic Sign Inventory and Replacement
The City has been offered the opportunity to prepare an itemized list of
inplace traffic control signs; note those that are deficient in size,
color, shape, message, and overall condition, procure new signs and replace
signs as needed; and to obtain partial funding for the entire procedure.
KN /DOT has received Federal Hazard Elimination Safety Funds which, through
McLeod County, would pay for 90 percent of regulatory and warning signs,
delineators, and object markers. The project would, for the most part, be
administered by the County, with actual sign replacement being in 1988 at
the earliest.
There are several signs throughout the City that should be replaced.
Consideration of the attached resolution as a miscellaneious agenda item
is respectfully requested at this time because consideration at the next
Council Meeting will be too late for the MN /DOT schedule, funding being on
a "first come, first served" basis.
EA /pv
Respectfully submitted,
Eugevi)e And son
Director of Engineering
COUNTY OF McLEOD
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
June 11, 1987
Mr. Gene Anderson
City Engineer
City Hall
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
McLeodCounty is very hopeful of receiving a 90% grant to update the
regulatory signing on its township roads and city streets. The grant
Is beinc offered only through the County, although the County Highways
are not part of the program. All 14 townships signed up.
You should have been contacted a year ago about the program. Now is the
time to sign up to take advantage of this opportunity. Please consider
this carefully to see if your city can benefit. If you have questions,
please call myself or Nancy Mahle at MN /DOT 612 - 296 -4838.
Sincerely
K
Richard Kjonaas
County Engineer
es
cc: Cities -
Hutchinson
Biscay
Brownton
Lester Prairie
Plato
P.O. Boa 236 Glencoe. MN 55336 (612) 864 -3156
go
An Equal Opportunity Employer
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION
IN TRAFFIC SIGN REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Resolution No.
WHEREAS, under the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1973, one of the
objectives set forth by the Department of Transportation is the conformance
of all traffic control devices to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways (b24UTCD); and
WHEREAS, funds are available through the Federal Highway Administration
for the installation of regulatory and warning signs /devices; and
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the County of McLeod, is
desirous of bringing the traffic control devices on streets and roads
located within its geographical limits into conformance with Minnesota
standards;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The City intends to participate in the Hazard Elimination Safety
Program. The City intends to remove, replace or install all regulatory
and warning signs, delineators and object markers necessary to comply
with Minnesota standards (MMUTCD) as determined through an approved
isinventory or inplace non - electrical traffic control devices.
2. The Administration is hereby authorized and directed to make
application to the Minnesota Department of Transportation to be
included in the program.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of June, 1987.
City Administrator
•
Y
•
•
•
,
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 23, 1987
WATER & SEWER FUND
*Public Employees REtirement
employer contribution
$278.90
*Withholding Tax Acct.
employer contri social sec.
476.29
*U.S. Postmaster
postage
156.24
Kables
air conditioner
299.00
Moodys Investors Service
prof. services bond
4581.50
SW Sec. M.W.O.A.
registration fees
65.00
State Treasurer
certification renewals
15.00
Scott Hansen
MPCA sec. meeting
4.00
Steve Christensen
refund overcharge
30.52
Big Bear
supplies
2.04
Amex Life Assurance Co.
July insurance
49.31
Central Garage
April repair jobs
975.17
Curtin Matheson Scientific
chemicals
67.34
Krasen Plbg & Htg.
repairs
35.00
Logis
computer charges
516.10
Mn. Mutual Life Ins. Co.
July life ins.
50.53
Mn. Valley Testing Lab.
testing
150.00
Physicians Health Plan
July medical ins.
998.45
Sun Life of Canada
July dental ins.
146.61
RCM Associates
prof. fees
2400.00
Arcon Construction
estimate #1
98,824.77
Robert L. Carr Co.
estimate #2
445,266.90
$555,388.67
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*Public Employees Retirement
employer contribution
$ 25.43
*Withholding Tax Account
social security
42.78
Carlsons Lake State Equipment
loader back hoe
23,439.00
Amex Life Assurance Co.
LTD July ins.
6.79
Hutch Iron & Metal
supplies
4.00
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
July life ins.
6.82
Physicians Health Plan
July medical ins.
157.14
Plowmans Inc.
2 police vehicals and repairs
21,084.00
Road Machinery
bal. of contract payment
27,395.00
Sun Life of Canada
July dental ins.
22.67
Schmeling Oil Co.
oil
219.25
Town & County Tire
repairs
13.00
Wacker Implement
parts
90.82
$72,506.70
// -Q
-2-
GENERAL FUND
*Withholding Tax Account
social security
$3364.64
*Public Employers Retirement
employer contribution
4234.44
*The Playwrights Center
play performance
138.00
*Dealer Automotive Services Inc.
freight charges
57.50
*Dept of Natural Resources
boat registration fees
104.00
*Hutchinson Jaycees Inc.
per resolution
1000.00
*Minnesota Zoo
performance
75.00
Kenelm Ahlness
250 canna bulbs
50.00
Paul Ackland
league convention
85.36
Scott Cooper
safety boots
30.00
Joe Vostinar
safety glasses
55.65
Lynn Spiekermeier
cond.use permit refund
10.00
Chuck Schmidt
gym refund
12.00
Karen Larson
gym refund
12.00
Russ Darnell
pool pass refund
8.00
Rhonda Binder
refund
4.00
Eileen Moehring
aerobics refund
12.00
Nadine Naustdahl
recreation refunds
37.00
Marg. Sprenger
swimming refund
12.00
Barb Field
swimming refund
10.00
Tim Van Hove
score keeper
60.30
Margaret Mueller
soccer coach
342.00
Beverly Mueller
soccer coach
342.00
TOM Hoffman
overpayment refund
10.00
Schutjer
Cantebury Downs refund
24.00
•Ed
American Red Cross
text books
52.00
Allied Mechanical Systems
repairs
139.15
Bailey Nurseries
trees
722.75
Betker Construction
repairs
565.00
City Business Twin Cities
advertising
50.00
Dons Lawn
fertilizer & spraying
590.00
Elvin Safety Supply
supplies
18.68
Fire Hooks Unlimited
supplies
113.54
Hutchinson Extension
fraining classes
187.00
Lundahls Catering
meeting
47.70
Mn. Ice Arena Mgrs. Assn.
membership dues
75.00
Northern Water Treating Co.
supplies
152.00
National Police Supply
supplies
69.16
Quades Sporting Goods
gun cleaning supplies
1.78
Quades Sport Shop
whistles
23.88
Rickeman Seed Center
fertilizer
104.00
S & S Arts & Crafts
supplies
44.98
Fire Marshalls Assn of Mt.
Field reservation
60.00
Craguns Conference Center
2 reservations
100.00
Twin City Theatre League
46 tickets
1564.00
Ordway Music Theatre
46 tickets
1058.00
Mn. Twins
29 tickets
234.00
Hutch Sewing Center
hoover belt
1.25
Fitzharris Athletic
supplies
361.92
Bakeries
supplies
18.98
•Lakeland
Walking Billboards
tee shirts
2541.00
A & B Electric
supplies
6.44
Albinsons
supplies
65.84
Automations Supply Co.
office supplies
146.56
Arnold & McDowell
legal services
2358.92
-3-
Big Bear
supplies
39.08
•Brunner Sales
solar salt
26.52
Browns Greenhouse
flowers
50.50
Ben Franklin
supplies
12.34
Cash Wise
june supplies
53.71
Central Garage
april repair jobs
5479.02
Carneys
14 butterflies
5.46
Copy Equipment
supplies
49.68
Country Kitchen
prisoner meal
4.19
County Market
supplies
34.44
Communication Auditors
repairs
90.83
Dept. of Public Safety
cjdn connect service
150.00
Don Streicher Guns
cleaning supplies
43.51
Crow River Glass
repairs
29.40
County Recorder
recording variances & abstrct
chgs. 60.00
Eileen Goeders
contract payment
1500.00
Erickson Oil Products
gasoline & supplies
87.56
Farmers Elevator Assn.
seed
32.00
Feed Rite Controls Inc.
chemicals
1368.71
G. F Nemitz & Sons
appreciation plaques
17.00
George Field
fire marshall meeting
9.00
Henrys Candy Co.
supplies
421.30
Home Bakery
supplies
5.40
Hutch Hospital
laundry
4.50
Hutch Drug
May acct.
38.09
Hutch Fire Dept.
registration fees & repairs
45.00
•Hutch Leader -
ads,pub costs etc.
694.34
ICMA Retirement Corp.
employer contribution
150.14
School Dist. 423
lifeguard
9.75
Ink Spots
printing
67.50
Doug Jost
services & expenses
1336.61
K Mart
supplies
132.47
Log-is
computer charges
4984.00
Mn. Sports Federation
3 doz softballs
137.85
MSF
sanctioning fees
48.00
Mini Biff
1 month rental unit
60.00
KennethB. Merrill
league convention
51.25
Motorola Inc.
repairs
807.90
Northwestern Bell
leased phone line
326.50
Olsons Locksmith
repairs
147.00
Gary Plotz
conferences
131.89
Mn. Elevator Inc.
elevator service
53.00
Peterson Bus Service
coach rental
780.00
Pitney Bowes Inc.
rental equipment
102.00
Quades Sports Shop
gold practice balls
31.25
St. Paul Book & Stationery.
supplies
12.08
Schlueters Refrigeration
repairs
233.75
Shopko
supplies
55.28
Tnemec Co. Inc.
supplies
108.42
Uniforms Unlimited
e ^uipment
15.85
West Pub. Co.
law books
74.25
Life Assurance
July LTD ins.
.593.85
•Amex
Mn. Mutual Life Ins.
July life ins.
509.64
Physicans Health Plan
July medical ins.
10,471.58
Sun Life of Canada
July dental ins.
1491.75
$54,838.56
Mc
BOND FUNDS
Bonds of 1987
Moodys Investors Service
Mn. Dept. of Health
Mn. Pollution Control Agency
POLICE CONSTRUCTION FUND
League of Mn. Cities Ins Trust
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE
City of Hutchinson
PERA
Withholding Tax Acct.
Johnson Bros Wholesale
Quality Wine & Spirits
Griggs Cooper & Co.
Ed Phillips & Sons
Coast to Coast
Commissioner of Revenue
Commissioner of Revenue
•Mn. Veterans Publications
Hutch Leader
•
bonding fees $ $918.50
application for permit fee 150.00
permit fee application 80.00
$ 1148.50
insurance coverage $1475.00
payroll
$4568.87
employer contribution
174.75
employer contribution
298.01
liquor & wine
1139.46
liquor & wine
3111.46
liquor & wine
2506.81
liquor & wine
2709.16
supplies
57.04
June sales tax
4810.29
May sales tax
9620.57
advertising
20.00
advertising
18.00
$ 29,034.42
WORKING CONDITIONS
Twenty hour week, subject to some rescheduling as needed.
0
T06 c--S 9,1PT%uN
DRAFT
TITLE POLICE OFFICE CLERK jobdes49
6-87
DEPARTMENT POLICE -34-
SUMVISED sr CRIV OF POLICE
SUMMARY THIS IS OFFICE BORE IN THE POLICE DEPAIMM
G
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
7q
I
�
1 Operates the word processing system for the department to maintain
a
records and reports, produce correspondence, etc.
F
2 Operates the computerised riling system (POSSE) to make the majority of
I
the department entry work into the system.
2
T
3 Uses typewriter to produce certain reports and reoords.
4 Uses manual filing system to maintain certain records.
3
a
5 Assists police secretary with the non - sufficient funds check program.
1
6 May use radio console oommunication system on a limited basis.
i
i
7 Performs related duties as required.
•
EQUIPMENT: Typewriter, telephone, dictaphone, teletypewriter, copy machine,
computer system, radio ccutmication system.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Post - secondary training and related experience in computerised office
procedures. Respect for confidential information.
WORKING CONDITIONS
Twenty hour week, subject to some rescheduling as needed.
0
Job Description —Off ice Clerical Personnel
Duties:
1. Enter into Department filing system.
2. Assist Police Secretary with the non - sufficient funds
3. Able to type reports.
4. Operate the word processing system for the Department.
5. Operate computerized filing system, POSSE.
6. Perform related duties of a clerk /typist.
7. Able to do filing and do posting work.
PO l 1 C E t� Ep'i
' AITh
F69t To& be-sc�
check program.
Equipment:
Computer system, typewriter, telephone, dictaphone, copy machine, teletypewriter,
familiar with radio console communication system.
Mental Application:
Under the general supervision of the CHief of Police or Senior Peace Officer on
duty, and within the guildelines of the Police Department Policy. Work to be
reviewed through reports, personal inspection and discussion.
Responsibility:
This position responsible for the majority of the Department entry work into
Posse. Also it requires a sense of confidentiality.
Education, Training, Skill: •
High School education and college level training in clerical skills is recommended.
Must be able to operate computerized equipment.
Experience:
Six months experience in office and clerical skills necessarry for effective
performance.
Working conditions:
Twenty hour week, subject to some rescheduling as needed.
U
Parks 0 Recreation 0 Forestry • Civic Arena
V LAJ 800 Harrington Street 6 Hutchinson, Minnesgla 5350 I^ • (612) 587 -2875
W:.
TO: Gary PQotz rr
FROM: Bruce Enir�on
V�
V' 'i 1
DATE: May 28, 1 87 REVISED: June 10, 198 "'`
SUBJECT: Report on L , FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The bottowing nepont oAe actuae expenaee and aevenue ban. the
Limited Wanhenty concept.
HUTCHINSON CIVIC ARENA
Lease A6r66Pi6nc - Exhiblc A
cc: Mayon 8 City Council
MoAv Haugen
t11'INLU
YSTIIM7L
ACT It
I.750
SuunA . L1Abt.
ALT PJ
300
Ll.ctrlclw
ACT r1
[l.ctrlc.l Hoo W
1t7.50
AR 64
St.,in,
700
P.c111tP 9.nt
Purkl ilc
Tic L.t Cu..
Pl.no /Tu�.r
6u. Otti—
0,,,. /Tuns
'
Tc...U,y !b.
Ll../Car Tuv.l
T ."t Se lief+
Nl.c. lqutp. l
Ann. Tu.a
11.cEmh. /SCr.w.
OtNr T.a /Ll cw...
P.r41ny
In.urwc.
Cl.. Up
A5C lml
0..+..
Tit L.t Pcln,l.,
104
IIpd
Duor�uJU..ry
Pomb /Gt.rin,i
101
St.,. N.no.
Di. J.cL /H.C.
W.4.r.
Joint Prow1cr
Sput /Up.ruur.
115
H. Ut11:.
folic..
H.v.P•P.f Aay.
775.86
61r..
Y.J I. /T.V.
316
St.t1in,l Luc.1 H.lp
Or„y N.lp
Pua.c. /!'IY.r•
.-- 726 —^—�.
TOTAL INSLS
7.907.64
TOTAL 'VL6UL
4.166.00
cc: Mayon 8 City Council
MoAv Haugen
W 37(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
TCH/NSON, M1NN. 55350
June 23, 1987 FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Mr. Gerald Cornell
Hutchinson Computer Industries
555 -3rd Ave. N.W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Cornell:
As indicated in my letter dated June 1, 1987, the District Hydraulics
Engineer for the Minnesota Department of Transportation was contacted to
determine the feasibility of a temporary solution to the drainage problem
on and adjacent to the westerly side of your property. In particular, we
suggested that the north end of the culvert beneath T.H. 7 be partially
blocked.
While the Minnesota Department of Transportation recognizes the drainage
problem, it is contrary to State policy to partially block drainage
• structures due to potential liabilities.
As stated in my previous letter, the drainage problem will be addressed
and proposed as a 1988 improvement project.
•
Sincerely,
CI�T`Y OF HUTCH(INSON
Eugene - Anderson
Director of Engineering
EA /pv
cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Mayor and City Council /
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL B. LeBARON
GARY D. M�DOwELL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON
DANIEL J. BERENS
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K. FRETLAND
CHARLES L NAIL, JR.
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
June 23, 1987
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
lot PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587 -7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. James D. Groehler, P.E.
Regional Airport Engineer
Aeronautics Division, Room 417
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Mn. 55155
Re: Hutchinson Airport
.Our File No. 3188 -87 -0003
Dear Mr. Groehler:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
5861 CEDAR "RE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55418
(812)545 -0000
MN TOLL PR EE 600- 343 -4545
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(812) 380 -2214
714 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE.MINNESOTA 55336
(012) 864 -6111
�C c •r '�S
1�i987
You and I have discussed the matter of the Hutchinson Airport
appraisals on at least a couple of occasions in the course of the
last several weeks. I recognize that there are many demands on
your time, but I am getting pressure not only from my client, the
City of Hutchinson, but also from Attorney William Haas representing
some of the affected land owners, to resolve this matter. If we
can provide additional information that will speed the process
up or if a conference between you and I would be helpful or if there
is any other specific action you would like us to take, please advise
as we are anxious to cooperate in whatever manner we can.
It is my understanding that we have
attempt to settle this matter until
from your office and accordingly, we
you.
Thank you. Best personal regards.
Very u y yo rs,'
i
ARNOL McDOWE� L
G B r}7� Anderson
GBA : a
CC ary D. Plotz
no authority to make offers or
we have received the go ahead
look forward to hearing from
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
MICHAEL B. L&BARON
GARY D. McDOM'ELL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
DANIEL J. BERENS
STEVEN S. HOGS
LAURA K. FRETLAND
CHARLES L. NAIL. JR.
DAVID A. RRUEOOEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
June 23, 1987
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
Mr. James H. Schaefer -
Attorney at Law
105 Second Avenue S.W.
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(O12) 567 -7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: Parking Appeals
Our File No. 3188 -87 -0028
FOR YOUR INFORMATION:
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 58418
(812)545.0000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(012) 380 -2214
714 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE. MINNESOTA 55338
(012) 664 -Bill
'� 21 22232 S
4
' ^� JU�i987
m
REC&ViD
a-
Dear Jim:
• I note in reviewing the above referenced file that I last wrote
you concerning the above referenced subject on June 4, 1987. At
that time, as.I mentioned in prior correspondence, I had an op-
portunity to visit with Bill Haas and I needed to confirm with you
certain discussions related by Haas. To date, you and I have not
been able to get together to discuss these issues.
If it would not be too inconvenient, perhaps we could visit this
coming Friday at a mutually acceptable time and place about this
and related issues. I believe we have a couple of other matters
that also could profit from some discussion at that time.
I will be in trial until Thursday afternoon sometime, but if you
could let the office know what time you would be free, I would be
more than happy to make the journey across town to visit with you.
Thank you. Best personal regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL.
. G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
CC Gary Plotz
DAVID R. ARNOLD
"'HARLES R. CARMICHAEL
ICHAEL B. LiBARON
GARY D. H-DOWELL
PAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
DANIEL J. BERENS
STEVEN S. HOOK
LAURA K. PE TLAND
CHARLES L. NAIL. JR.
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
JOSEPH N. PAIEMENT
F_ I
L
•
June 15, 1987
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
Mr. James Marka
Building Inspector
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
(012) 507 -7575
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: City of Hutelkinsort
vs elvin Klockmann
Ou - - 020
Dear Jim:
6661 CEDAR LAZE ROAD
MIIINRAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66416
(B19)S46.6o00
MN TOLL FRZE soo -343 -4646
601 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 65371
(619)366 -9214
714 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE. MINNESOTA 6SOO6
(612) 664 -6111
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
QC
ro a
S
Enclosed please find two complaints which have been prepared on
property owned by Melvin Klockmann. These complaints will be signed
b 4 future and prosecution wi commence
with respect to each of these
My file is a little vague on exactly what the problems are at 545
Franklin, although I have heard from some of the surrounding neigh-
bors and as near as I can tell, the principal problem is to fill in
a dangerous hole and to clean up the yard.
If you have any questions in connection with any of the foregoing,
please contact me.
Thank you.
Very t yours,
ARNO McDOWELL
L -
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosures
CC Gary Plotz
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
WARYB. L.BABON
WARY D. MCDOWE
FAYE KNOWLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOWE
CHARLES L. NAIL, JR.
DANIEL J. BERENS
LAURA H. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
June 18, 1987
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545 -9000
MN ToLL FSEE 800- 343 -4545
CABLE <MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS
TELECOPIER: (OW) 545 -1793
REPLY TO:
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue East
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Re: Update on Junker Litigation
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
501 SOUTH POURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 358- 2214
714 TENTS STREET EAST
OLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336
(612) 864 -6R1
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 567 -7575
J
Hutchinson Office o UN198j
0
-1S
Dear Mr. Plotz:
• I thought I would take this opportunity to report to the Council
regarding the status of the lawsuit commenced by the City's
contract garbage hauler, Junker Sanitation, Inc. As you know,
the City was finally served with a Summons and Complaint on
June 2, 1987. I have secured an extension of time to answer from
Lee LaBore to July 1, 1987. In the interim, the Complaint has
been submitted to the insurance carrier for the City of
Hutchinson.
National Casualty Company has accepted this matter for defense
and assigned attorney Joseph Marshall of Circle Pines, Minnesota
to act as the City's attorney in connection with this litigation.
I have been in touch with Mr. Marshall to discuss with him the
facts of this case and to assist him in preparing an adequate
defense. I have also asked him to keep us fully advised of all
developments.
Attached is a copy of correspondence received from the National
Casualty Company dated June 5, 1987. This letter is notice of
reservation of rights by the Company to dispute coverage as to
some of the damages. You will note the language in the letter
indicates that the Company does not believe they will owe damages
for any contract adjustment that Junker Sanitation may have
40
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
June 18, 1987
Page 2
•
coming to it as a result of the cost of living dispute. it would
not appear that the policy exclusion relied upon by National
Casualty will affect coverage for the 3M problem sited by Junker
Sanitation. Since some of the damges sought by the Plaintiff are
covered by the policy, at least apparently so at this juncture,
the carrier will provide a defense for all of the allegations
involved.
i will, of course, keep you advised as to any developments with
regard to this dispute. if you have any questions or if i can
provide any additional information at this time, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARN04D & McDOWELL
G. Uri Anderson
GB�:rf
Enclosure •
11
'NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY
•
Reply to:
PROPERTY /CASUALTY DIVISION
8370 E. Via De Ventura
Scottsdale, Arizona 85258
Post Office Box C -4110
Scottsdale, AZ 85261
June 5, 1987
City of Hutchinson
c/o City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue, W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: James Junker, et al vs. City of Hutchinson
Telephone
602 -948 -0505
Telex 16 -5705
m JilNi987
�, REEyI�lEi)
Claim No: 44429 -18
Policy No: PO 622103
Suit Filed: District Court, 1st Judicial District,
County of McLaod
Dear Sir:
• This letter will confirm receipt of the lawsuit filed in the 1st Judicial
District Court, in which the plaintiff has alleged a dispute over an
escalation clause in a long- standing contract between the plaintiff, Junker's
Sanitary Service, Inc., and the insured, the City of Hutchinson.
•
The plaintiff specifically states that the insured has negligently failed
to provide a cost of living increase on an annual basis, as well as an
annual increase based upon an estimated increase on landfill rates.
Since it appears that the insured, by the contract arrangement, may have
received some form of profit or advantage to which it may normally net
have been entitled, we direct your attention to Exclusion (1) of the Public
Officials policy provided by National Casualty Company, which reads as
follows:
"The Company shall not be obligated to make any payment
or defend any lawsuit in connection with any claim against
the INSURED:
(1) Based upon or attributed to their gaining in fact any
profit, advantage or remuneration to which they were not
legally entitled;"
Home Office • Southfield, Michigan
City of Hutchinson
June 5, 1987
Page Two
Accordingly, based upon the allegations found in the suit as noted, and
the exclusion, National Casualty Company is taking this opportunity to
inform you that we may have a defense for providing coverage for this loss.
The Company is reserving the right to assert any and all defenses to coverage
under the policy. Further, National Casualty Company is not waiving any
rights nor admitting any obligation under the policy while investigation
and discovery of this loss continues.
Once further facts are determined, which may effect the coverage as noted
by the foregoing exclusion, National Casualty Company reserves the right
to withdraw at any time from the investigation of this incident and the
defense of this legal action, upon reasonable notice to the insured, the
City of Hutchinson.
Defense of this suit under this reservation of rights will be assigned
to counsel and that law firm will be designated to you by separate cover.
Should there be any questions or comments concerning the content of this
correspondence, please let me know at your convenience.
Sincerely yours,
J m Silver
Sr. Claims Examiner
JS /gc
•
L
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL
WXCHAEL B. L&BARON
RY D. M�DOWELL
PAYE 6NOMLES
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. HARRY ANDERSON
STEVEN S. HOGE
CHARLES L.NAIL.JR.
DANIEL J. BERENS
LAURA R. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOGEMANN
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
June 18, 1987
Aar,OLD & McDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410
(012) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
CABLE: MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS
TELECOPIER: 1012) 545- 1003
REPLY TO:
Mr. Eugene Anderson
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue East
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 56311
(6121 380-2214
114 TENTH STREET EAST
GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 66336
(612)904 -Bul
101 PARR PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 65350
(6121 590 - 1515
�.h
^'
Hutchinson Office ROCEIM
Re: Roger and Edna Lund Easement
Dear Gene:
• I have had a chance to review
Mrs. Lund have put together,
attorney or Mr. DeMeyer. As
conclusion that the easement
L
BY
the proposed easement which Mr. and
at the direction of either their
presently drafted, I agree with your
is not acceptable.
First, the easement language can be interpreted as forbidding any
future assessments against the subject property for any improve-
ments including sanitary and storm sewer, sidewalk and similar
unrelated projects. Note particular the reference "all future
development costs" which, of course, could very easily be
construed to include such additions to the area. It is my
understanding that the easement is needed only for the
reconstruction and improvement of the roadway known as Southgrade
Road and Highway 15_ Substitute language that might accomplish
the same task might read as follows:
"Party of the second part further agrees that no assessment
shall be levied against the property abutting the easement
or serviced by the easement for the reconstruction of
Southgrade Road, which reconstruction is part of the party
of the second part's 1987 improvement program."
Language similar to this will have the effect of limiting the "no
assessment" clause to the 1987 improvement.
Mr. Eugene Anderson
June 18, 1987
Page 2
Second, the language in the proposed easement which has the
effect of forbidding parking within the area covered by the ease-
ment is also unacceptable. As a matter of easement and property
law, since the parking language is included as consideration for
the granting of the easement, arguably, no future council would
be in a position to readjust the parking ban. Also, usage of the
property may change over a period of time and parking may cease
to be a significant problem. An alternative might be to agree to
a solution to the parking problem which will prevail for a spe-
cified period of years but again, I would prefer not to see the
language with regard to the parking situation included in the
easement. I think that is a separate issue that should be
addressed between the property owner, the tenant and the City
Council although I understand that it might be difficult to
secure the easement until such time as the parking question has
been answered.
I hope these
this problem
not hesitate
Thank you.
comments have
If I can be
to contact me.
very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
CC:
CC: V6 ary D. Plotz
been helpful to you in connection with
of any further assistance, please do
•
1
0
•
•
F (612) 587.5151
�b
C/I Y OF H U I CHINSLF
3.7 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN 55350 a
M E M 0
DATE: June 12, 1987
TO: Barry Anderson, City Attorney
FROM: Eugene Anderson, Director of Engineering
RE: Easement from Roger and Edna Lund
V/ Ko '1�
�Jt
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The City received the attached signed easement from the Lunds. We had
submitted perpetual and temporary easement, also attached, for their
signature several weeks ago. Their attorneys revised the easement we had
submitted by separating the perpetual easement from the temporary easement.
We have not yet received signed copies of the latter. The revised
perpetual easement contains two paragraphs on the second page, both of which
are circled, that could create problems in the future. The paragraph
pertaining to costs could restrict the City's power to assess the property
abutting the easement in the future. The paragraph pertaining to prohibiting
parking, while I do not foresee a problem with presently doing so, could
create a problem in the future if development and subsequent owners tend to
favor allowing parking, whether restricted or unrestricted, in which case
this particular covenant in the revised easement would be violated.
Please respond to these concerns. The appropriate easements must be obtained,
then assigned to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, so that they may
advance the status of the T.H. 15 Project.
L gena � A
Director of Engineering
EA /pv
attachments
cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator /
Rr,fu1'A,& a rr_"Zv ieR�-
s�s�T
THIS INDENTURE, made this /10_ day of , 1987, by •
and between Roger Lund and Edna A. Lund, trustees of Credit Trust, of
the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, party of the first part, and
city of Hutchinson, party of the second part:
WITNESSETH:
THAT, for and in consideration of the sum of one Dollar and other
good and valuable consideration in hand paid to the parties of the
first part by the party of the second part, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged said parties of the first part do hereby grant, bargain,
sell and convey to the party of the second part, its successors, or
assigns, forever, a right- of-way easement, with the right, privilege,
and authority to said party of the second part, it successors, assigns,
lessees, and tenants, to construct, erect, operate and maintain, •
underground storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water mains, and/or other
utilities, services including roadway and appurtenances thereto on,
along, over, through, across, or under the following described land
lying and being in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Section 12, Town-
ship 116 North, Range 30 West; thence southerly along
the East line of said Section 12 for a distance of
33.00 feet; thence Westerly on a line parallel to the
North line of said Section 12 for a distance of 445.00
feet to the Northeast Corner of Lot 4, Block 2,
Hutchinson, Mall, according to the plat on file at the
McLeod County Recorder's office; thence Northerly on a
line parallel to the East line of said Section 12, a
distance of 33 feet; to the North line of Section 12;
thence Easterly on the North Line of said section 12
for a distance of 445.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
The party of the second part shall return the premises to the •
condition it was in prior to its construction, erection, operation or
maintenance of the rights granted herein, to a condition as close to
•
that as existed
prior to their
use of this
easement as
possible,
consistent with
its exercise of
its rights
under this
easement.
The party of the second part, further agrees to provide for
reasonable ingress and egress to the property of the parties of the
first part from Southgrade Road.
As further consideration, party of the second part agrees that
all future development costs, construction costs, maintenance expense
and any other charges associated with the easement, if any, requested
by the party of the second part and/or its associates, shall be borne
by the party of the second part.
Further, it is acknowledged that the party of the second part
shall exercise its powers under the Laws of the State of Minnesota and
shall prohibit parking on South Grade Road anywhere within the area
included within this easement.
Party of the second part further agrees to save and hold harmless
party of the first part from any liability arising from the party of
the second part or its agents occurring on, under or through property
covered by this easement.
IN TESTIMONY WEREOF, the said party of the first part has
hereunto set its hand the day and year first above written.
CREDIITT TRUST
by: R6gerLund
r'� an ��"� vr' •
and: Edna A. Lund
C�
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA
1 SS:
COUNTY OF MCLEW 1
On this � day of 1987, before me,
Notary Public within and for id County and State, personally
appeared, Roger Lund and Edna A. Lund, trustees of credit Trust, 411�
County of McLeod, State of
Minnesota, to me known to be the same persons described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed
the same as their free act and deed.
CYNTHIA - ZIEhtER
1p1MT CYNTHIA L I IEMER
MCLEOD COUNTY
E u�niWo, Kpv July 17. 1991
rNIM-9", _!.. iI_
•
•
. E A S E M E N T
THIS INDENTURE, made this
Eas&w�.e*t+ as s"% -AeA
day of May, 1987, by and
between
of the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota, party of the first
part and the City of Hutchinson, party of the second part:
WITNESSETH:
THAT, for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar and
other good and valuable consideration in hand paid to the party of
the first part by the party of the second part, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged said party of the first part do hereby grant,
bargain, sell, convey and warrant to the party of the second part,
its successors, or assigns, forever, a right -of -way and easement,
with the right, privilege, and authority to said party of the second
part, its successors, assigns, lessees, and tenants, to construct,
erect, operate and maintain, underground storm sewer, sanitary sewer,
water mains, roadway and other utilities on, along, over, through,
across, or under the following described land lying and being in the
County of McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
Beginning at the Northeast Corner of Section 12, Township
• 116 North, Range 30 West; thence Southerly along the East
line of said Section 12 for a distance of 33.00 feet;
thence Westerly on a line parallel to the North line of
said Section 12 for a distance of 445.00 feet to the
Northeast Corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Hutchinson, Mall,
according to the plat on file at the McLeod County
Recorder's Office; thence Northerly on a line parallel
to the East line of said Section 12 to the North line of
Section 12; thence Easterly on the North line of said
Section 12 for a distance of 445.00 feet to the point of
beginning.
Together with a temporary slope and construction easement
expiring on December 1, 1990 on, along, over, through, across or
under the following described lands lying and being in the County of
McLeod and State of Minnesota, to wit:
Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 12, Township
116 North, Range 30 West; thence Southerly along the East
line of said Section 12 for a distance of 33.00 feet; thence
Westerly on a line parallel to the North line of said Section
12 for a distance of 33.00 feet to the point of beginning;
thence continue Westerly on a line parallel to the North line
of said Section 12 for a distance of 170.00 feet; thence
• Southerly on a line parallel to the East line of said Section
12 for a distance of 5.00 feet; thence Easterly on a line
parallel to the North line of said Section 12 for a distance
of 40.00 feet; thence Southerly on a line parallel to the
East line of Section 12 for a distance of 10.00 feet; thence
Easterly on a line parallel to the North line of said Section
12; thence Northerly on the East line of said Section 12 for a
distance of 15.00 feet to the point of beginning.
Together with the right of said party of the second part,
its successors and assigns, to place, erect, maintain, inspect, an
relocate at will, roadway, underground sewer, sanitary sewer, wale
mains, and other utilities, adding thereto from time to time, acros ,
through, over or under, the above described premises, to cut and
remove from said premises on either said any trees, or other obstruction
which may endanger the safety or interfere with the use of said roadway,
sewer, water mains, and other public utilities, fixtures or any
structures on said premises; and the right of ingress and egress to
and over said above described premises for the purpose of repairing,
renewing or adding to said roadway, sewer, water main, sanitary sewer,
and other public utilities, and for doing anything necessary or use-
ful or convenient for the enjoyment of the easement herein granted;
also the privilege of removing at any time any or all of said improve-
ments erected or constructed upon, over, under, or on said lands.
Together with the rights, easements, privileges and appurtenances
in or to said lands, which may be required for the full enjoyment of
the rights herein granted.
Party of the second part further agrees to save and hold
harmless party of the first part from liability arising from the
negligence of party of the second part or its agents occurring on,
under or through property covered by this easement.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has
hereunto set its hand the day and year first above written.
0
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this
personally appeared
By:
SS
day of May, 1987, before me a Notary Public,
to me known to be the person or persons described in and who
executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed
the same as his free act and deed.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
G. Barry Anderson
ARNOLD 6 McDOWELL •
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Telephone No. (612) 587 -7575
Attorney I.D. #196X
-2-
0
•
•
At
i
NAME
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
DAT
ADDRESS
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
June 8, 1987
Lauren Beatty 700 Shady Ridge Road, Hutchinson - Swim-Ling
' Camnie Ellis 904 Rolling Greens Lane, Hutchinson -Concessic
William Mills 962 Rolling Greens Lane, Hutchinson - T Ball
Scott Cooper 550 - 3rd Ave SW, Hutchinson - Maintenance
Michael Skaar 970 Goebel Circle, Hutchinson - & mning
' D,aavyi�dd Stewart 5, Hutchinson - Sw n u. ng
JOB TIT Lt ch Rt. 1, Hutchinson - Swimning
SUPERVISED BY B. Ericson et al
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE X OTHER: Returning /previous seas
FULL TIME
PAY RATE T1, T2 as per job duties
COMMENT
X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
DE RTMcENT SHE'
PERSONNEL�OORDINATOR
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
CRY OF HURN NSON
NAME ADDRESS
Barry Watson 226 Dale Street, Hutch
JOB TITLEPart Time Liquor Slbre Clerk
SUPERVISED BY Charles Nelson
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE OTHER:
PAY RATE I
COMME
FULL TIME X PART TIME OR SEASONAL •
Up to 15 hours /week
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS,
(�Li
DE ARTMENT HEAD
PERSONNEL COORDINATOR
CITY77ADMINIST�ATOR
�Lj y�1 �' t��l �rl-
•
EMPLOYMENT ADVISORY TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
,7
NAME
Jerry Carlson
Nadine Naustdal
Joel Starrett
JOB TITLE AG i,�*pd
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE June 18, 1987
/_10717: » *1
315 Washington Ave W., Hutchinson (Swim Sup.)
850 Ash, Hutchinson (Aerobics $6/hr)
850 Lynn Road, Hutchinson (Baseball $3.50)
SUPERVISED BY Bruce Ericson et al
EMPLOYMENT STATUS X NEW EMPLOYEE X OTHER;
PAY RATE
IN
FULL TIME
returning seasonal
X PART TIME OR SEASONAL
THE ABOVE PERSONNEL ACTION CONFORMS TO ADOPTED PERSONNEL
POLICY AND TO THE COUNCIL APPROVED SELECTION PROCESS.
DEPARTMENT HEAD
PERONNEL COORDINATOR
CITY -ADMIUSTRATORJ
Ll
r]
0
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
MINNEAPOLIS STAR AND TRIBUNE
June 9, 1987
Charitable gambling in state
yields 11.5% for charities
By Robert Whcreatl
Staff Writer
Of every $100 spent on charitable
gambling in Minnesota last year,
S
11.50 went to the charities the
gambling helps to support,
according to the Minnesota
Charitable Gambling Control
Poard's latest report.
The amount earmarked for charity
was down from the $13.50 Isom
every $100 spent in 1985 on bingo,
raffles, paddle wheels, tip boards
and pull tabs, the main income
sources of charitable gambling.
The rest went toward prizes,
salaries, supplies, rent, taxes and
other expenses by the religious
groups and fraternal and service
organizations that operate
nonprofit gambling enterprises in
the state.
The report also shows substantial
growth. Last year almost $400
million was spent on charitable
gambling; and the trend indicates
that the figure will Mt exceeded
this year. It has become an
important source ol'renenuc for
some charities.
"It's a good, sound business
operation for us," said Willard
Munger Jr., executive director of
the Multiple Sclerosis Society of
Minnesota. The society sells pull
tabs born rented space in 55 to W
bars in the state.
"Once you get your controls, it's
almost a guaranteed source of
funds. It's almost as certain as the
sun coming up. Fer us, there s
,imost no gau ' Ic." said Munger.
Last year $44.4 million, or 11.5
percent of the 1386.1 trillion spent
on charitable gambling in
Minnesota, was earmarked for
charities, according to the report.
That figure is not out of line s%Wi
those of other states. North Dakota
has allowed charitable gambling
since 1977, and Attorney General
Nicholas Spaeth said yesterday that
since then the amount of gross
gambling receipts going to charity
has been 10.03 percent.
Minnesota took over regulation of
charitable gambling from local
jurisdictions in July 1985. In that
incomplete reporting year there
was $1 1 1.4 million in gambling. Of
that, S 15.1 million was earmarked
for charity.
Most of the gambling money goes
back to some of the planers in the
form of prize money. Operators of
chaff ilahlc gambling games prefer
to base the percentage going to
charities on "adjusted gross
receipts," after subtracting the
prize money. Last year the percent
going to charity, less prizes
returned to placers, was 52 percent
in Minnesota.
Sp ;,oh ca;d nrijti"ed rro�s receipts
going to charities in North Dakota
since 1977 has acen 55.8 percent.
Thougli Ow grooms in charitable
g mbling is expectcl to exceed
34(X) million this year, the amount
that gees to the charities is
considerably less. than nonprofit
agencies raise in more traditional
ways, according to Harold Adams,
executi, a director of the Charities
Review Cuuncil of Mimnesota.
Last year tae United Way of
Minneapolis end the r 4• :lcd Way
of St. Paul Area raised about S48
million for charitable pin poses.
Munger of the Multiple Sclerosis
Sexier: said that the traditional
forms of fund - raising give a much
larger percent of their total receipts
to charity, but that there is an
essential difference with gambling.
"People who buy pull tabs don't do
it to help the charity. For them it's
a form of entertainment," he said.
to gel the players. the games have
to provide an enticing re? urn. He
said the society's pull tab games
return about 80 percent to players.
The society gels the 20 percent
from which all overhead must
come.
But it pays, Munger said Last year
the society's net from gambling was
$5 71016. about one -tbird of its
total bvda_,ci, l b.d should grow to
about 411 pertc +t this year, he said.
0
y61ag101* 13� >s�
JUN 1987 ,
,tom ©� •�
! FOR YOUR INFO&ATION
`�itszsz+►�sY
7
/- AlrCNiNJUAl W/l-TER bf-P7 —
OF
L / }SED ONI
/3' p u rtrzTLr2 w: +rzl� l/Sl4G { /J
/1 J C. LFNL /z s'�L 6U G i2, p F
Ott /�lo. rts2 % f �R t /y� "!2 C � / ✓C:
L r v r 0 I n/ it, 144V y J Ery i
Cir /(.-'1 VVErZ of f.,ffi .10
`//'>f /ZJ r /Mv) W /iY— /' of t C-J
/frs /z r Gf rz L r srn '� .a -wn-y 77f�.
f?rz,5i/ r7 tt:- 77v � n/ C.> r/ r J
It, Cr pU, 114U j, GtA-cV ypc/
Jtr37-/r"/ C.!- h*acrc✓t; 14.�0 2E'
/ :I f c L r -' 1- E• 77.71 iL.
>
J/z+17r (.V+//tr, / DO/V7' tvNn T\
�C /_ C /-V /L Guy 1&C! CO l ) -J, )
/r AJ0 Lvr a t >Z J4f(e('2 /S /fJ
70/ c c- r f ri7 y Ci„
Ken Aus
•
•
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON CHARTER COMMISSION
Wednesday, June 10, 1987
1. CALL TO ORDER
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Chairman Chuck Carlson called the meeting to order at 7:50 pm. with the
following members present: Dick Popp, Walt Clay, Dale McLain, Harold
Juul, Kay Peterson, and Chairman Carlson. Members absent: Jean Peterson,
Delores Saar, Phil Graves, Jeff Haag, Tom Bolder and June Wick.
2. MINUTES
There being only six members present, no formal action was taken.
3. DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDATIONS BY STAN PESKAR, LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
Following is the complete revised City Charter as of June 10, 1987,
including several recommendations by Mr. Peskar. Please discard all
other drafts up to this time (6/10/87) as not to confuse them with this
final printing.
4. NEW BUSINESS
The next regular meeting of the Hutchinson Charter Commission will be
held Tuesday, June 23, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. in the Fire Station.
5. ADJOURMENT
There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
1
•
L J
•
0V 0
_,,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL Q,'
Minutes and Meeting Notic e
May 18, 1987
Present: Butch Wentworth, Chairman
Doug Jost, Energy Coordinator
Glenn Matejka
Hugh Foster
Jay Beytien
Absent: Ken Prihoda
Gary Plotz
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The meeting was called to order by Butch Wentworth. Last month's
minutes were approved. The council is still interested in adding
a female member. Doug will contact the Chamber of Commerce to
get a list of possible candidates.
Doug mentioned that nine (9) Phase I surveys had been completed
and 22 audit requests had been received. There have been four
(4) Phase I reports completed and Doug is working on four (4)
Phase II reports. All Phase I survey customers have expressed an
interest in having the Phase II report done also. Doug would
like to change the Phase III audit to be an assistance stage. He
would help secure bids, write up specifications and determine
actual paybacks for loan processing. There would be a $15.00 per
hour charge for this service. This would generate more income
for the program, help insure customers actually implement
estimated measures and free up more time to complete a greater
number of Phase I and II audits.
The Council reviewed the program expense records to date. Doug
would like the utility to send out a second audit offer in the
June billing.
Doug requested funding to attend a Refrigeration and Air
Conditioning Operation and Maintenance Workshop. The request
includes $65.00 tuition, $32.00 mileage and four (4) hours (�
time) reimbursement. The request was passed.
The 1987 CYCLE THREE, C. E. C. Grant application was reviewed.
Some small changes were noted but overall content was approved.
MEETING NOTICE
The Hutchinson Community Energy Council will meet on Monday, June
29, 1987, at 12:00 noon in the Central District Services office
building, lower level.
Doug Jost, Recorder
MINUTES
CENTRAL PRAIRIE RAILWAY ASSOCIATION
MAY 28, 1487
X40-, •
N'17voY
The Central Prairie Railway Association met on Thursday, May 28, at 12 o'clock
noon at the Sheep Shedde, Hutchinson.
Chairman Les Forman called the meeting to order. He stated the purpose of the
meeting was to obtain a commitment for matching funds for the grant being
applied for. This would come from the shippers and could be in the form of
letters of credit. Summary of financial information: Total needed for
railroad rehabilitation and operation is $1,0609000 over a two -year period.
State and Federal funds should provide 70% of this amount
Railroad should provide 20% of this amount
Shippers should provide $105,000, or 10% of this amount
The shippers' committment could be $65,000 the first year and $409000 the
second year. The second year obligation could be taken care of by rebates from
shipments. Present usage indicates that Lester's might be expected to commit
40x, 3M Co. 40x9 and remaining shippers 20%. Chairman Forman hopes that a
commitment can be obtained from the shippers soon so as not to delay the grant
application.
Following discussion, the consensus of the group was that the Association
should proceed on the basis of planning to make this commitment. All shippers
will be contacted for this purpose. •
Meeting adjourned at 1 p.m.
Hazel S1tz, Recording Secretary
Members Present:
Les Forman, Lester's
Roger Stearns, Stearnswood
E1Roy Dobratz, 3M Co.
Gary Blythe, Chamber of Commerce
Others Present:
Ancher Nelsen, Advisory
Ron McGraw, Attorney
Michael Ross, Dakota Rail
Donn winckler, Mid-MN Development Commission
Frank Dierberger, 3M Co., St. Paul
Larry Graf, BDUZ
Hazel Sitz, City of Hutchinson
•
r�
�J
AGENDA
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, NNE 15, 1987
1. Call to Order - 8:00 P.M.
2. Report By Vergil Florhaug of CAM Regarding Police Facility*
(a) Revised Budget
(b) Status of Bidders
3. Easement for Former Pamida Property And Associated Legal Fees
(Deferred from June 8, 1987 Meeting)
4. Adjournment
•
*Report being mailed by CAM
directly to Council members
on June 12, 1987
r 1
LJ
l �
• RUTCIIIN POLICE STATION `
TRADE CONTRACTOR CRAN� PER STATE CODE REQUIREMENTS
JUNE 12, 1987
BID PACKAGE
TRADE CONTRACTOR
CONTRACTS
RETURNED
BASE BID i
REVISION
BASE BID + REVISION
TO CAM
#I - EARTHWORK
E & T EXCAVATION
JUNE 2,
1987
6,993.
0
6,993
02 - LANDSCAPE
MARGOLIS
MAY 5,
1987
4,570
0 !
4,570
x3 ASPHALT CONCRETE
ATKINSON
JUNE 9,
1987
10,702
0 :
10,702
x4- PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING
(PART OF BID PKG xG
p
0 :-
p
x5 - CONCRETE WORK, CONCRETE FL. TOP
PETERS CONSTRUCTION
MAY 5,
1987
30,983
0
30,983
06 - STRUCTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE
BLADHOLM
18,292
1,219:
19,511
x7 - UNIT MASONRY
PINSKE
__._.
81,695i
1,600:
83,295
x8 -METAL FABRICATION
:STAR IRON
8,233:
0 :
8,233
x9 - ROUGH CARPENTRY 'MATERIALS'
:PINSKE BUILDERS
21,271
0
21,271
410- CARPENTRY INSTALLATION 'LABOR'
:GOPHER STATE
_29,015:
2,017 !
26,032
x11 - PRE WOOD TRUSSES
.GREAT PLAINS
8,333 :
735 !
8,298
x12 -ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK
RON S CABINET
10,087 -
0
10,087
x13 EXTERIOR TRIM
.DIRECT PURCHASE
6,025
0
6,025
#14 - SHEET WATERPROOFING
NICHOLS & HINES
JUIJE 9,
1987
5,193
0
5,193
x15 - JOINT SEALERS
iCARCIOFINI
!
2,384:
0 :.
2,384
x16- SECURITY HOLLOW METAL
:TRUSSBILT
MAY 27,
1987
3,710
0 !
3,710
x 17 - STEEL DOORS & FRAMES
:SELL HARDWARE
8,495:
505
9,000
x18 WOOD DOORS
:SELL HARDWARE
!
2,385
26
2,411
019- STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS
'SPRING VALLEY OVERHEAD
JUNE 2,
1987
2,936
0
2,936
426- STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS
NYSTROM
�
7,295 �,
0
7,295
021 WOOD WINDOWS
.GREAT PLAINS
5,205:
0
5,205
022 FINISH HARDWARE
ISTRAUGHN HARDWARE
19,310:
1,930
21,240
023 - GLASS & GLAZING _,...,.
!NEW ULM GLASS
JUNE 9,
1987,
4,138
0 -
4,138
x24 - LATH & PLASTER
- GAUSMAN BUILDERS
...,
3,800 -.
1,762
_._,. „
5,582
025 GYPSUM DRYWALL
:BER -WALL
16,170:
0
16,170
x26 -TILE
(JERRY'S TILE
JUNE 2,
1987
4,597 I
0
4,597
027 ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS
!HENDLEY'S INC.
MAY 27,
1987
1,875
0
1,875
x28 .-,RESILIENT FLOORING
:BARIL'S PAINT & CARPET
1,507:
0
1,507
x29 - CARPETING �
BARIL'PAINT &CARPET
3,938:
0 i
3,938
x30 - PAINTING
:R & H PAINTING
JUNE 2,
1987
12,900:
0
.,.
12,900
x31 - SPECIALTIES
SPECIALTIES
12,559:
0
12,559
x32 - PROJECTION SCREENS
IBARTLEY SALES
209:
0
,.,
209
#33 WINDOW TREATMENT
ON WINDOW
789:
0
.... ..
789
x34 - PIPE & EQUIPMENT INSULATION
(ALLIED MECH
MAY 27,
1987
8,413:
2,255:
I0, 668
035 PLUMBING
WEST SIDE PLB. & HEAT
49,383:
560
49,943
x36 - FIRE PROTECTION _.
(ALLIED MECH ,...
MAY 27,
1987 .�
6,550.
0
6,550
x37 - HEATING
`WEST SIDE PLB & HEAT
24,929 `
0
..............
24,929
CONSTRUCTION ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, INC.
7401 Central Avenue NE. - Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432
• • 0
038 -
H, V.A.L.
......... ...... ...... . ........... ....... ........... .
_.... ... ... .........
:ALLIED MECH
_ ... ...... ........... ._.. _.._ _..__..._ ............ ,.........................._._.
....... . ...........
MAY 27, 1987 42,270
_... ___ . ........... ...........
...
3 305.
.- .._.........._
. ..... - .............
45,575
_. _......
.......
039-
_. ._.
CONTROLS &INSTRUMENTATION
_.
ALLIED MECH
MAY 27, 1987 16,588
0
16,588
040 -
ELECTRICAL
IMCNERNEY INDUST.
.... ... ....._.......,..
84,018:
..,....... ._......... �............ ......._...___.........
951 !
84,969
........... .............
._ .....
..................
. _......... ......... ............................._.
(ROOF & SHEETMETAL ALLO,' -ANSE
5,000
5,000
_......
...._.....
:TOTAL BASE BID PACKAGE
___........._..._._ ........ .......... ............. ._....... ...._.- _........:..............
582,695
..:....,....... ......___
......._...:_. .._..___.
_...._._......
:TOTAL REVISION
21,115
..........
.. __ ...............__._......___.
.__...........
............_. .......:......._._...,..... ........................ _....
(TOTAL BASE + REVISION
...__..........._.__.........__..... ....._.__.............__.......
...:........... _...__..... _........ ..: .......
_._........_.._......... ..._....... .. :._.....
..........:.......__......
.. ....._.. ..__........._.____....
_....._.....__...
603, 810
___
_.___.
_. _..........
. ......._.. _....._
_... _. _.__ ............ _'._. _ ........... ..... _. _._.....__..... :.__.....
.CONTINGENCY
....... ....... _..._ ..._...... ... .... _..... _. .__....... ..._.. _.. .:_............
_....__........... :.....__... __...:.....
11,642
..........__... :..... _...... .............
_. ...........:... ... ........
.........: _. .... _._...._
__.. _.........
11,642
._.... _.....
:GENERAL CONDITIONS
55,467
55,467
_ .....
........_.... ......_.......
.AE FEES
.._._............_.......... ....._....._. ........ ..._...........
59,669.
....__.................__. ....._.....__............
.. ...........
....._..:....._............
59,669
...,.__......
:CM FEES
35,000:
35,000
!TOTAL CONSTRUCTION
-TOTAL CONST. WITH REVISIONS
765,588
_.__ ....__...
POTENTIAL ADDS
.. _. _... _. _... ...... _.,.... ...__.. __.......... __.....
NEEDING CONFIRMATION:
_._. _. __. _._ . ............._
_:_. .........
_... __......
Bid
Package 86
- Bladholm: Resubmission of shop drawings. Add $1,000.00
_.._ __..__.._ _..._
_....._._ .___ ... :............
... ._........:..............__.
..............
_._.
Bid
.__._...
Package G10
__._... .___.... ....:....
- Gopher State: For possible negotiation, Add $5,000.00
NOTE: Concrete
Trade Contractor does not include curbs and gutters
.......
_ ................
outside
............ .................
_....
of property line in his bid.
..L..... ......:............... .........__.........:__.._...._
.... _........ _....._..... ......�.... ...._...... .... .... ........... ..._.._.. .:..
_.__.__ .........
.__...... ...___...._ :.._......... ...:........
.......
....... _...:..... _. .......
... ... ... .._.
_.. ...............
(612) 587 -5151
H!/TlH'
CITY OF HUTCH /NSON
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHlNSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 3, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Status of Obtaining Easement on the Cash Wise Site
This department has been in communication with the owners of the site occupied
by the Cash Wise store, regarding obtaining a perpetual easement. The
easement is needed to enable reconstruction of the east frontage road along
T.H. 15 to improve safety. At the May 12th Council Meeting, a contract was
awarded for the project, contingent upon the City obtaining the easement,
• Negotiations with the owner of the tract have resulted in the owner stating
that they would be willing to sign an easement provided that the consideration
include payment by the City of legal fees incurred by the owner in reviewing
and signing the easement. Since there are a number of partners, apparently
two lessees, and a trustee, all having an interest in the parcel, the owner
contends that their legal costs could be considerable. The owner would be
willing to document their legal costs, with the stipulation that they not
exceed $2,500.00.
We request authorization to proceed with negotiating an easement with
consideration being reimbursement of paying actual documented legal costs not
to exceed $2,500.00.
EA /pv
•
Respectfully submitted,
&
Director of Engineering
7
,+ R
(612) 587.5151
Hur�W ; CITY OF HUTCHINSON
3, '�/AS;41NGTONAVENUEWEST
/ IYI-7C =4NSON MINN 55350
M E M 0
DATE: June 12, 1987
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Engineering
RE: Consideration of Proposed Easement on Deforest Wagner Property
The City has been negotiating with Mr. Wagner for the easement that is needed
on his property to enable installation of utilities from Dale Street to School
Road to serve the new school. The property is presently rented to a farmer
and is being used for agricultural purposes. Mr. Wagner wishes to be
reimbursed for damage to crops caused by the construction for 1987 and also
for 1988 when normal growth would be hindered, and has asked that an estimated
range of compensation be included on the easement document. In consultation
with the McLeod County Extension office, potential crop values frange from
• $500 to $1,200 for the approximately 3.5 acre easement area.
We respectfully request consideration of this proposal at the Council's
special meeting on June 15th, because construction is scheduled to begin
shortly, so time is of the essence. We request authorization to proceed with
obtaining the easement based on the aforedescribed consideration.
EA /pv
•
Respectfully submitted,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Eugene �n
dl?
derson
Director of Engineering
NUTCHI STATION ( 1 4. 0, ,
N P�j
TRADE CONTRA PER SqTA7 CIE REQUIREMENTS
BID PACKAGE w
TRADE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTS RETURNED BASE BID REVISION : BASE BID + REVISION
................................................. .......................... .............................. ............. . .................. .................... ..................... ......................................
TO CAM
.......... .................. ... ...... - .................... .................................. I ........................ ............... .................... ................. 0 . . . .......... .......
........ ........ . . ...... .........
.. . . ... . . .. ................. . ......... . . . ...... ......................... .......
#1..... I ........... ........ .................... .................... - .........
�E & T EXCAVATION
.11 ART.HW,DRK. ................ ................ ........... . . ... ...... ............ ........ .. ....... JUINE.21. 1987 ........ 6 9?3. .. .... ... 6,993,
LAIJDS.CA..PE .... ....... I ............................ : MA-RG. OL I S I ........ I ................................ ........ MAY-S',-1987 ....... .. . .... ..
ASPHALT CONCRETE 1987 ATKINSON JUNE 9t
............ .... .... ..................... I ......... ........ 10,702 0 10,702 -
................. .............
04 - PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING PART OF BID PKG 06 0
.......... ........ .... 0 i 0
.............
..........................................................
0 CONCRETE WORK, CONCRETE FL. TOP . PETER'S CONSTRUCTION 10 983 0
...... ........ ................. ........... . ......... ................... - 7'.. '. 30,983
, ..:, ... ..........
06 - STRUCTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE :BLADHOLM N
. ....... ... .... .. ................................... ...... - ............ 18,?92-.OL ... 1,219 19 511
17 - UNIT MASONRY PINSKE ................ ........
.............. 81,6951 1,600 : 83,295
... .........
STAR IRON 8,233 0 8,233
. 09-- 'ROUG H CARPENTRY 'MATERIALS' PINSKE BUILDERS . 21;271 0i 21,271
- 1-1 .. ...
................... . .
010 - CARPENTRY INSTALLATION *LABOR* :GOPHER STATE
24,015 2,017 26,032
............ ... ......... ............ ...... .. ......... ................. .. .1 ... :. ......... - .. -.4 .. .... - .................
0I I - PRE WOOD TRUSSES :GREAT PLAINS JUNE 10, 1987 8,333 =35 8,298
.......... ............... . - ............... - .................................. . .......
.......... I ........ ........................
112 - ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK RON'S CABINET 10,087 0 10,087
............................. ... - ....... ................................... I ...... ........ ...... 1.1-1 ...................... ................. .............. . .......
x13 - EXTERIOR TRIM :DIRECT PURCHASE
NA 6,OZ5 0 6025
........... ........ .......................... ............................................................ ......... ............. ........... - ... :- ....... ....... I ... :..'' ....................... .......
014 - SHEET WATERPROOFING :NICHOLS & HINES LINE 9. 1987 5,193 0 5,193
.............. I .......... .................. ............... ....... . i
.1.1 ...... : ....... I.. I I .. 1. 1.. . . I ........ ... ''. - .................. .. ................................ .
015- JOINT SEALERS
.. . . CARCIOFINI . . % . : JUNE 15, 198* 7 2,38 1 .. 0 . . 2,3
84
........ . 1 .1 .... ...... ..... ... ... I .: ... I .. I .... - - -
- SECURITY HOLLOW METAL TRUSSBILT MAY 27, 1987 3,710 0 3,710
........-1 ... '' ... I .... I ....... ...... - . - .... . ........ .. . ... .... . ...... I .... , .
,
117 STEEL DOORS & FRAMES :SELL HARDWARE JUNE 15, 1987 8,495 505 9,000
111 1 ........ 6.6---. ........... I ....... I ......... ....... I ..... - ... 1. - ...... ................. I ....... ..... .. I ...... . --. I ....... ......... . . m ... ........... . 1: ............ . ............ .
18 WOO OORS :SELL HARDWARE JUNE 15, 1987 2,385 26 2,111
... I .... 11 ........ I, , � - ..... .......... .. . .... .. ........ ........ . . ....... ... ..... . � . .............. . I .............
019 - STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS ..... .. :SPRING VALLEY OVERHEAD i JUNE 2, 1987 2,936 0 2,936
YSTROM 7,245
1111 020 STEEL DETENTION WINDOWS :N . j�,",,7,245 0 1111..
#Zl WOOD WINDOWS GREAT PLAINS JUNE 10, 1987 5,205 0 5,205
... ............ ....................... :.- 11, , ...' ... .. . 1 -11.1 ....... ....... .
IZZ - FINISH HARDWARE STRAUGHN HARDWARE JUNE 15, 1987 19,310 1,930 21,240 1111.. . ...................... ......... . .. .... ......... -
023 - GLASS & GLAZING NEW ULM GLASS JUNE 9, 1987 0 9 138
... ....... ........ . ......... ...... ............ ...... . ...... .........
021 - LATH & PLASTER :GAUSMAN BUILDERS 3,800 1,782 5,582
.............. ..... ..... .. .... ..... . , , ............ .... . .. .............
#25 GYPSUM DRYWALL �BER-WALL 16,170 0
... ..... ... ................. ...... 6,170
026- TILE
-JERRY'S TILE JUNE 2, 1987
4,597 0 1,597
............... ........... ........ I . ..... ........................ ...... ......... .............. �. I . .'': ................ - � ................ ......
NZ7 - ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS HENDLEY'S INC. p MAY 27, 1987 1,875 0 : 1,875
... ....... .............................. . .... -.1- .. ............ I ............ ............... ........... - .... ... ......... .... .. ....... .......
RESILIENT FLOORING 'BARIL'S PAINT & CARPET JUNE 15, 1987 1,507 C) : 1,507 1111 . ............... I .... . . . - ...: . ..... . d, ........ . . .............. .
026 --CARPETING ....... :BARIL-PAINT & CARPET JUNE 15, 1987 3,938 3,638
....... I ........................... ....... ................................................. ............... ....... ....... ......... . . ........................................... ...
3.0.7.PAINTING ........... I .................. .... ....... - .... R.A.H.PAINTING ............ .......... ... V A JUNE 2, 1987 i 12,900 0 i2,900
031 .SP EC IALTIES SPECIALT IES A. 1 2 559 0
.... 1. 1 - ..........11 ................. .. I .. . -
..ii .......................................
PROJECTION SCREENS :BARTLEY SALES 209 0 209
.. . ........ ........... 1. . .. ................................ a ........ .......... ................................... . .. . ..................... ............. , -; .... ............. .. ........... .......... ...............
033 - WINDOW TREATMENT ON WINDOW k� 789 * 0 789
........ 1. ......................... .......... ....................... :- ..... . .. . . ..................... 4.4 ........... .... .... ........ ......... - ........ w ..................... ...................
034 - PIPE & EQUIPMENT INSULATION :ALLIED NECH MAY 27, 1987 8,113 : 2,255 16,668
.. ............... ................................................... :-.1-1 ...... . . ...... .. .......................... ........ . .. ....... ...... - ........ ............. . ..... ....... ........... ........ " '
035 - PLUMBING ;WEST SIDE PLB. & HEAT 49,383 560 49,943
-FIRE PROTECTION E C Ti 0 N
ALLIED MECH MAY 27, 1987 6,550 0
............ ........ ............... .... ... .. .................. ...............................
037- HEATING :WEST SIDE PLB & HEAT
;ty/c
................................................ I ..................... ......................................................... ................................... ........... I........:....................
..........
....... w ........................... I ........................................................................................... ................................... .................... ..................... ...........
IIXR-W V A r
.................
..............
.............
..............
........................
........................
............. I ..........
........................
.......................
810
. ...............................
N c, - Lov&g 7Pq e J-Io;t)
