Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
cp06-13-1989 c
HUTCH INS ON CITY CALENDAR 1 ^LEEK OF June 11 TO 1 June 17 11 �� f 980 WEDNESDAY -14- 10:00 A.M. - Directors Mee at City Hall SUNDAY -11- THURSDAY -15- MONDAY FRIDAY -16- W A T E R VACATION: GARY PLOTZ - June 12 - 16 TUDAY 11:45 A.M. - CAER Committee Meeting 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall SATURDAY -17- C R N I V A L df 44� AUSIC AGENDA iMMAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1989 1. Cali to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Jon Lindekugel, Christ the King Lutheran Church 3. Consideration of Minutes - Special Meeting and Regular Meeting of May 23, 1989; Bid Openings of May 23, June 2, June 5, June 6, 1989; Board of Review, June 5, 1989 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Building Official's Report - May 1989 2. Airport Commission Minutes of May 30, 1989 3. Police Commission Minutes of May 2 and May 17, 1989 i (b) Reduced Refuse Rate for Senior Citizen Action - Notion to order report and minutes filed and approve reduced rate 5. Public Hearing - 8_00 P.X. (a) Proposed Layout And Improvements (Letting Ho. 7, Project Ho. 89 -13) for Highway 7 Bast Action - Notion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve Notion to waive reading and adopt Resolution Ho. 9018 6. Communications, Requests and Petitions (a) Presentation of Plan for Youth Center for Council Approval Action - Motion to reject - Notion to approve: Rental Contract,; Job Description, And Authorization to Advertise And Fill Position of Youth Center Manager (b) Consideration of Request By Hutchinson Assembly of God Church To Use Library Square for Concert On July 30, 1989 Action - Notion to reject - Motion to approve (c) Presentation By Donohue & Associates On Engineering Services Proposal for 3N Solvent Recovery Project Action - Notion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1989 0 (d) Presentation By Fire Department Regarding Aerial Ladder Repair Action - 7. Resolutions And Ordinances (a) Ordinance No. 89 -01, Second Series - An Ordinance Adopting A Revision And Codification with Certain Additions And Deletions, of All Ordinances of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first reading and set second reading June 27, 1989 (b) Ordinance No. 89 -02 - An Ordinance Amending Zoning Regulations In The City of Hutchinson And The Official Zoning Map (Casa Addition) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second, reading and adopt (c) Ordinance No. 89 -03 - An Ordinance To Vacate Utility Easement In Casa Addition Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt (d) Resolution No. 9010 - Resolution For Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 8. Unfinished Business (a) Consideration of Public Parking Lot for North Main Street Under The Development District Program/Tax Increment Finance Plan of 1980 (DEFERRED MAY 23, 1989) Action - 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Flood Damage Reduction Grant Program Action - (b) Consideration of Renewal of Hotel/Notel Inspections Contract with State of Minnesota - Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (c) Consideration of Contract Amendment with Municipal Ordinance Codifiers, Inc. Action - Motion to reject - Notion to approve and enter into contract PA 9 CITY COURCIL AGENDA - JURB 13, 1989 (d) Consideration of Calling for Bids On 1989 Improvement Bonds Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (e) Consideration of Setting Date for Refuse Board of Review with Junker Sanitation Action - (f) Consideration of Award for Section I and II for Water Treatment Facilities Filter Rehabilitation And Control System Modification Project Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (g) Consideration of Preparation of Assessments And Setting Public Hearing for Letting No. 4, Projects 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and set hearing July 11, 1989 at 8:00 P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9012 A No. 9013 9 (h) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Transit Bus Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award contract (i) Consideration of Proposals for Engineering Services for Downtown Water Services And Sprinkling Action - (j) Consideration of Sprinkler System Connection for Benjamin Property Off Franklin Street Before Final Surfacing Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (k) Consideration of Alley Storm Sewer Line West of Main Street Between Second And Third Avenue And Alley Surfacing Between Second And Fourth Avenue Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (1) Consideration of Selecting Architectural Firm to Prepare Study On Remodeling And /Or Replacement of City Hall Action - (m) Consideration of Waiving Building Permit Fee for RCM Project 14007.01 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive fee M CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 13, 1989 0 (n) Consideration of Approving Plans And Specifications And Advertise for Bids for Bluff Street Project, Letting Ho. 5, Project No. 89 -15 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve plans and specifications and Open Bids July 11, 1989 at 2;00 P.M. - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9011 (o) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Purchase of Two Combination Grass And Sidewalk Maintenance Machines Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into contract (p) Consideration of Accepting Engineer's Report, Waiving Public Hearing, Approving Plans And Specifications And Advertising for Bids for Letting No. 6, Project No. 89 -04 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve report and plans and specifications - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9014 - No. 9017 (q) Consideration of Recycling Recommendations from Solid Waste Management Committee Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve recommendations (r) Consideration of Specifications for Burns Manor Renovation And Authorization To Advertise for Bids Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve specifications and advertise for bids 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Adjournment 4 9 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHIMSOM CITY COU11CIL TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1989 1. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 7:30 P.M. The follow- ing were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, John Nlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Consultant Engineer Marlow V. Priebe and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend Lavern Johnson. 3, MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of May 9, 1989 and bid openings of May 9, 1989 and May 15, 1989 were approved as distributed. 4. ROUTINE ITEMS (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS • 1. FINANCIAL REPORT - APRIL 1989 2. HRA BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1989 3. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 1, 1989 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1989 5. HOSPITAL BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 1989 (b) RENEWAL OF SET -UP LICENSE FOR LITTLE CROW BOWLING LANES (c) REDUCED REFUSE RATE FOR SENIOR CITIZEN The motion was made by Alderman Nlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to order report and minutes filed, issue the license and approve reduced rate. 5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8 :00 P.M. (a) LETTING 10. 3, PROJECT NO. 89 -03 (DOWNTOWN SPRINKLING SYSTEM) Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read Publication No. 3994. He then stated there would be an assessment hearing on this project at a later date. • Engineer Priebe reported on Project No. 89 -03, which will involve work on the water service lines along a portion of Main Street. He then displayed a drawing which showed which buildings presently have a sprinkler system and which buildings would be adequate for service. 1 �, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 • City Administrator Piotz stated the original project was a Small Cities Grant with $100,000 earmarked in the commercial rehabilitation award for sprinkling the basements of buildings over 1500 square feet in the rehabilitation project and was based on the number of people requesting money. The present funds are committed and limited; however, money will become available when loan payments have been made. To assure that all buildings with basements over 1500 square feet are sprinkled at the lowest possible cost, the City is proposing to do the work under one contract and assess the cost to the property owners according to the formula established by the City Council. Additional funding has been made available through the Revolving Loan Fund. Emil Rix, 104 North Main, asked if the City would be tearing up Main Street again. He wanted to know if there would be service to the buildings in the back. He inquired about buildings with no basements. Mr. Rix asked how the line would be put in and if there would be a water main on each side of Main Street. Engineer Priebe responded that Main Street would only be torn up for repair. Buildings without basements will be booked up to what is there. That is part of the program at this time. He reported there would be two mains, and the line would be in the sidewalk on either • side of Main Street. Dale McLain, 138 South Main, commented on the cost for sprinkling the basement. He questioned where the extra money came from for the extra square footage if the property owner paid the first 50 cents. Mr. Mc- Lain inquired about the starting date and the timeframe on the project. He wondered if Main Street would be closed to traffic while the project was being done. Engineer Priebe reported no time had been set because the project had not been approved by the City Council and no design had been completed. Downtown Revitalization Project Coordinator Connie Mangan commented that May 19, 1991 was the deadline for using the grant money. Administrator Plotz stated there were several funding sources for the cost, with the major one being the district increment financing. Then the Small Cities Grant will pay $100,000 toward the project. The City could not do the project without the funding from these two sources. Russ Meade, 100 Vashington Avenue East, commented there was no require- ment that the property owner had to put in the sprinkling system right away. Fire Marshal George Field stated it was State law for any building over 1500 square feet to be sprinkled. • An unidentified man requested clarification that $300 would bring the water into the building's basement. He asked how long the law had been 2 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 in effect. He stated he had never heard of sprinkling residences, and part of the building will be residence. He inquired if the cost of the sidewalk would be assessed to the property owner. Mayor Ackland stated the City would abandon the old leads and put in new leads. Art Benjamin, 35 First Avenue S.W., asked under what circumstances first and second floors of buildings have to be sprinkled. He asked if the costs on the sheet he received were accurate. Fire Marshal Field answered that the second floor residence has to be protected. The property owner would get full credit from the insurance company for sprinkling. The main service coming into the building is the most expensive part; sprinkling the first, second floors, etc., would be less costly. Engineer Priebe reported no costs for the project had been given at this time. John Korngiebel, 45 Washington Avenue East, asked about the old hotel • building and wondered if it would be difficult to make an additional connection in the future. There is only one connection in, but there may be two buildings in the future. He asked how the hotel would par- ticipate in the sprinkling project. Administrator Plotz stated the hotel was one of the participants in the grant program; however, the first or second floor sprinkling would have to be done by the property owner. Coordinator Mangan reported the hotel project was put into the Small Cities Grant program separately. The tax increment money was awarded for the hotel for providing future housing for low and moderate income persons. The sprinkling needed to be added into the development costs. Dale Smith, 28 First Avenue N.E., thought the purpose of the hearing was to determine whether or not the project would be done. He stated he has two properties, and he improved his building in 1986 prior to this project. He felt he and other owners should be given some credit for improvements in the last two or three years. His taxes have in- creased beyond the point of being able to stay in business. Mr. Smith stated he was not for the project, but he would like some updating on the sprinkling for the building. He commended the City for trying to get funds for the project, but Mr. Smith felt the businesses along Main Street were not where they could be. City Attorney Anderson stated that the City was stuck with the exist- ing fire code. However, the City had not enforced the code because it recognized that something bad to be done to assist with an economical way to meet the code. The present service lines are going to have to be repaired because they are not adequate. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 • Roger Olson, American Legion representative, asked if non - private or- ganizations fall under any special grant or if they are considered a business like those along Main Street. He felt the Legislature treat- ed them rudely when it took away some of the funding from gambling. Coordinator Mangan commented that non - private are not eligible under the Small Cities Grant, but may be eligible under another program. She would talk to John Bernhagen about it. Sharon Hultgren, 125 South Main, stated she was against the project. Mayor Ackland read the letter received from James G. DeMeyer in which he expressed objection to the project. Steve Reed, 116 North Main, inquired if it was necessary to sprinkle when there was no upstairs or basement to a building. He suggested a compromise and run the line to each building but not require sprinkl- ing at this time. If everyone was assessed $300 and no more, the City would be doing something to meet the State requirement. Irvin Burich, 102 South Main, inquired if the drainage was adequate or would be adequate. He commented on the remodeling of the bank build- • ing and the sprinkling system. He asked if all three floors had to be sprinkled. The Fire Marshal stated there were no apartments on the second and third floors so it was not required. Alderman Torgerson moved to close the hearing at 9:17 P.M. Motion sec- onded by Alderman Miinar and unanimously carried. Following discussion on recognizing property owners who had recently sprinkled their basements within the past few years, Alderman Torger- son moved to approve and order the preparation of plans and specifica- tions for Project No. 89-03 and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9008. Motion seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried. Consultant Engineer Priebe recommended that the City hire an engineer- ing firm to assist with the sprinkling project and suggested the RCM firm. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve ob- taining a price from RCM as consultant engineering firm. Motion sec- onded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried. After further discussion, Alderman Carls directed the Consultant En- gineer to get a second quote on the project work. Notion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (b) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 250 - LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 89 -02 . Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 9:43 P.M. and read Publi- cation No. 3992. !I • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 No one was present to be heard on the project. Alderman Xlinar moved to close the hearing at 9:50 P.M. Notion seconded by Alderman Miku- lecky and unanimously carried. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 250, award contract to Juul Contracting Co. in the amount of $209,942.75 Part A and $9,906 Part B, and waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9006 and No. 9007. 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) STATUS REPORT ON HUTCHINSON HOTEL PROJECT Developer John Korngeibei reported the project proposal remained about the same as outlined in the grant proposal. He anticipated completion of the financial package and bid documents within the next two months, with construction beginning in fall. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR HUTCHINSON LIONS CLUB TO OPERATE PORTABLE FOOD WAGON IN WEST RIVER PARK DURING WATER CARNIVAL WEEKEND • Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the request. Notion seconded by Alderman Nikulecky and unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF WATER USE AT COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE MOBILE HONE PARK Mr. Bill Block, owner of Country Club Terrace, reported water problems at the park which were causing the water bill to be high. He requested that the sewer usage for 1989 be based on the 1988 fall quarter bill- ing. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to use the 1988 fall quarter billing for the 1989 sewer usage, with continued monitoring. Motion seconded by Alderman Nikulecky and unanimously carried. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION N0. 9002 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The notion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Carls and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9002. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO OPERATE FOOD CONCESSION IN LIBRARY SQUARE DURING SUMMER MONTHS (DEFERRED MAY 9, 1989) • Following discussion of the proposed agreement, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and enter into agreement with Peter Brynildson. Notion sec - onded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 (b) CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC PARKING LOT FOR NORTH MAIN STREET UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROGRAM/TAX INCREMENT FINANCE PLAN OF 1980 (DEFERRED APRIL 25, 1989) Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Carls, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to defer. (c) CONSIDERATION OF SEWER AND /OR WATER HOOK -UP FEE POLICY Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to defer to the next meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (d) REPORT BY CONSULTANT ENGINEER ON SOUTH GRADE ROAD SIDEWALK Engineer Priebe reported on the proposed sidewalk project. It was rec- ommended that a 10 foot easement be obtained across private property on the north side to permit the sidewalk to be installed without moving the trees and possibly a short section of easement on the south side near the highway. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to direct the Engineer to negotiate easements on the north side and short section on south . side of highway and put sidewalk project up for bids. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar. Motion amended by Alderman Mikulecky that the City would maintain the sidewalk once it is in. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. Main motion carried unani- mously. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS Alderman Carls moved to discontinue service as recommended unless other arrangements had been made or other dates were set. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED STREET LIGHT PROJECTS IN 1989 Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the recom- mended list, except for Wagner, New Junior High School, one -half of Hwy. 7/Main to California and Hwy. 7 /California to Shady Ridge Road. Motion seconded by Alderman Carle and unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF PAYMENT ADJUSTMENT TO MENARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AIRPORT HANGAR The Consultant Engineer recommended retaining five percent of the con- • tract with Menards, with a payment of $99,655 and retainage of $5,245. Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the adjustment and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9009. Motion seconded by 6 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF REJECTING BIDS FOR LETTING 110. 4, PROJECTS NO, 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07 & 89 -12 Following discussion, Alderman Carle moved to reject the bids for Let- ting No. 4 since two of the three bids did not meet requirements and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9005. Motion seconded by Alder- man Torgerson. The motion failed three to two, with Aldermen Carle and Mlinar voting aye and Aldermen Mikulecky and Torgerson and Mayor Ack- land voting nay. Alderman Mikulecky moved to award the bid to the bidder who complied with the specifications. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and failed three to two, with Mayor Ackland and Alderman Mikulecky voting aye and Aldermen Carle, Mlinar and Torgerson voting nay. Alderman Carle moved to reject all bids, readvertise for bids, and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9005. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. • (e) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR TEMPORARY BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION Engineer Priebe reported that Structural Specialties, Inc. had submit- ted a proposal to construct the temporary bridge at a cost of $15,000. XcKimm Transit, Inc. will be paying for a portion of this cost. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to approve construction. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried. The motion was made by Alderman Carle, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve $75 for a permit to the DER. (f) CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING PARKLAND DONATION OF LOT 10 IN BLOCK 21, SOUTH HALF IN TOWNSITE OF HUTCHINSON Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve and accept the parkland donation of the Benton property. Motion seconded by Ald- erman Carle and unanimously carried. (g) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE GARAGE TO 533 HURON REQUESTED BY VILNA ROSS WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution No, 9003. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. • (h) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO REZONE FROM R -3 TO C -4 PROPERTY IN CASA ADDITION ALONG TEXAS AVENUE AND CALIFORNIA STREET BY JERRY BIRD WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 • Following discussion, the notion was made by Alderman Mikulecky, sec- onded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 8902 and set second reading for June 13, 1989. (i) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN CASA ADDITION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, sec- onded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried, to approve and waive reading of Ordinance No. 8903 and set second reading for June 13, 1989. (j) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY CLARK MILLER FOR CAR WASH ON HIGHWAY 7 EAST (A &W SITE) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried, to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9004. (k) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT IN LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CASA ADDITION WITH • FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, Alderman Mikulecky moved to approve the lot split. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (1) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROY LUND (TWO MILE RADIUS) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, Alderman Carls moved to refer to the County with no objection. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously car- ried. (m) DISCUSSION OF BURGER KING SITE PLAN WITH RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TO DIRECT STAFF TO BEGIN PROCESS OF REZONING PROPERTY Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, sec- onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to begin the rezon- ing process and that no building permits are to be issued unless they meet with the site plan of two years ago. City Attorney Anderson stated the order had been issued and would be served on Mr. Hornick, after which he has 10 days to meet the require- ments. He further reported the yellow house on Hwy. 7 East could be habitable and should be placed back on the tax roll. (n) CONSIDERATION OF JAY FREEDLAND FENCE PROPOSAL WITH FAVORABLE • RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, sec- 0 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 onded by Alderman Nikulecky, to approve the fence. Alderman Mikulecky amended the motion that approval was subject to DIR and PCA approval. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. ]lain motion unanimously carried. (o) CONSIDERATION OF BRW UPDATE WITH RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION TO AUTHORIZE BILL WEBER TO PREPARE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR CODIFICATION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, sec- onded by Alderman Nikulecky and unanimously carried, to approve pro- posal. (p) CONSIDERATION OF AIRPORT FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) CONTRACT WITH TOM PARKER WITH RECOMMENDATION OF CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION City Administrator Plotz reported on the recommendation of the Airport Commission and the favorable references on Tom Parker. It was recom- mended that the City Attorney prepare a one -year contract, with a hold harmless clause for the City. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and enter into • an agreement and refer to the City Attorney to draw up a contract with Tom Parker. Motion seconded by Alderman Mikulecky and unanimously carried. (q) CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Following discussion, Alderman Nlinar moved to approve and enter into the agreement with Priebe Engineering P.A. Notion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR Administrator Plotz reported that the Mayor was notified regarding the condition of the street by the Milk House. After the storm sewer was put in, the street was left with a gravel surface. Previously it had been blacktop. Two prices had been obtained for surfacing: $3,500 for seal coating or $800 for calcium chloride treatment. Following discussion, Alderman Carle moved to approve putting on cal- cium chloride. Notion seconded by Alderman Nlinar and unanimously car- ried. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSOI • Alderman Torgerson reported on a request for 15- minute parking zones on Main Street, by the bank and drug store. 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 1989 (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY Attorney Anderson updated the Council on the Ulland situation and mov- ing the trailers out of the Midwest Trailer Court. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CONSULTANT ENGINEER Engineer Priebe reported on the Hwy. 22 South project and stated it would begin at Fair Avenue on May 31. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The notion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Miku- lecky, to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 P.M. P • 10 0 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHIISOI CITY COUICIL TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1989 Mayor Ackland called the special meeting to order at 4:30 P.M. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Mike Carls, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Pat Mikulecky. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Finance Di- rector Kenneth B. Merrill. It was reported that on April 15, 1989 the City received six proposals for Architectural /Engineering Services for Remodeling And/Or Replacement of City Hall. The City Council subsequently selected the following three firms for Interviews on this date: Short- Elliott- Hendrickson, Inc. St. Paul, Minnesota Boarman & Associates Minneapolis, Minnesota Pauly Olsen Bettendorf Eastwood & Associates St. Cloud, Minnesota Representatives from the above -named firms made presentations to the Council. The special meeting adjourned at 6:20 P.X. N MINUTES BID OPENING TUESDAY, MAY 23, 1989 City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.H. Also present were Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, Maintenance Operations Supervisor Doug Meier and Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication Ho. 3981, Advertisement for Bids, Transit Bus, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read: Grande American Bus Sales, Inc. Anoka, MM Technical Institute of Hutchinson Hutchinson, MH MH Body A Equipment Co., Inc. Shakopee, MH Peace Lutheran Church Hutchinson, MM Hoglund Bus Co., Inc. Monticello, MH 538,321 2,000 Trade -In 3,350 Bid On Used Bus 36,121 4,000 Trade -In 3,200 Cash Bid 31500 Bid On Used Bus 47,643 5,000 Trade -In The bids were referred to the Maintenance Operations Supervisor for review. The bid opening adjourned at 2:12 P.M. Q 0 MINUTES OPE11 BID PBIIIG FRIDAY, JM 21 1989 Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 2:30 P.X. Also present were: Consultant Engineer Marlow V. Priebe, Water Supervisor Dick Nagy, Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson, and Chuck Barger of RCM. The reading of Publication No. 3991, Advertisement for Bids, Filter Rehabilita- tion And Control System Modifications, Water Treatment Facilities, was dis- pensed with. The following bids were opened and read: The bids were referred to RCM for review and a recommendation for award at the June 13, 1989 City Council meeting. The bid opening adjourned at 2:45 P.M. [I SECTION I SECTION II Moorhead Construction Co., Inc. $226,288 Base None Moorhead, MN 194,307 Deduct Tonka Egmt. /Alt. Richmar Construction Inc. 207,440 Base None Fridley, MN 198,200 Tonka Bqmt. /Alt. Orr Construction Co. Inc. 222,000 Base None . Bloomington, MN 10,000 Deduct Tonka Egmt. /Alt. Northwest Mechanical Inc. 269,000 Base None Long Lake, MN 18,000 Deduct Shank Mechanical, Inc. 219,700 Base None Minneapolis, MN N/A PAL Mechanical Inc. 205,178 Base Bethel, MN 18,000 Deduct None Tonka Bgat. /Alt. Gridor Construction, Inc. 207,400 Base Plymouth, MN 15,000 Deduct None Tonka Egmt. /Alt. Quade's Inc. None $71,500 Hutchinson, MN 5,000 Add The bids were referred to RCM for review and a recommendation for award at the June 13, 1989 City Council meeting. The bid opening adjourned at 2:45 P.M. [I MINUTES BID OPENING MONDAY, JUNE 5, 1989 Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.M. Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 3996, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 4, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read: Vm. Mueller 8 Sons, Inc. Hamburg, MN $87,603.00 Mid Minnesota Hot Nix Annandale, MN 83 634.56 The bids were referred to the Engineering Department for review. The bid opening adjourned at 2:10 P.M. Q i MINUTES BID OPENING TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 1989 Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 2:00 P.M. Also present were Supervisor Doug Meier and Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 3982, Invitation for Bids, Purchase of Two Com- bination Grass And Sidewalk Maintenance Machines, was dispensed with. The fol- lowing bids were opened and read: Stanley A. Ristow Hutchinson, MN MTI - Toro Plymouth, MN Long Lake Ford Tractor, Inc Long Lake, MN 8 513.00 - Used Combination Machine 205.00 - Used Snow Blower 23,724.00 - 1989 Combination Machine 2,071.00 - New Snow Blower 2,150.00 - New Broom 5,200.00 - Trade -In Bid 23,745.00 - Net Bid 2,100.00 - Each /#30780 -10106 d -10105 Cash Bid Combin. Machines 500.00 - Cash Bid Used Snow Blower 500.00 - Cash Bid Used Rotary Broom 25,190.00 - 1989 Combination Machine 1,744.00 - New Snow Blower 2,374.00 - New Broom 29,308.00 - Net Bid The bids were referred to the Maintenance Operations Supervisor for review. The bid opening adjourned at 2:05 P.M. W CONTINM BOARD OF REVIEW MONDAY, JUNE 5, 1989 Mayor Ackland called the continued Board of Review to order at 5:00 P.R. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Marlin Torgerson and Pat Riku- lecky. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Assessor Brad Emans, Assessor Emans reported that Robert Hornick had been advised of the intent of the City Council to put the property located at 35 Fourth Avenue Northwest back on the tax roll. No one appeared to appeal the assessment for market value of $35,400. Alderman Rikulecky moved to close the 1989 Board of Review. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. E 0 0 • • 0 {DS U.3 c l.xRrMISI OF COMM'"' '.see el+uua N1 Cfh5 n ►srlod In whleh Parmlts las j d I IrCe,,,C MA I ,a nne I P'eese cor.ect e�y arm ... gym...... m„n Z'R rcd.' •- ..:,Ii Ui• 3UILUI,eL3 0R S03 ZO'IING PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION 103500 27 8 9999 085 1 0 26 9999 02730 JAMES ►AAVA BLO6 OFFICIAL -vrr r' aoP,oP,,.re ba. below antl explain [ T TT NA In comments. LL 37 WASHINGTON AVE WEST ❑ Discontinued issuing permits HUTCHINSON NN 55350 n Mw filed With another system ❑ Split mto t.0 Or more system. ❑ Anne.ed lend Braes ❑ Had other than as -PLEASE COMPLETE AND MAIL 0 THIS FORM ON OR BEFORE 111111 L logo It no Permits were issued during this period, mark IX; in the box —e Bureau of the Consul 1201 East Instructions are Included. For end return this form Tenth Street further assistance, call collect J.Hsr ncur lar IN 47132 13011763-7244. NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED HOUSEKEEPING BUILDINGS r8uIldingg r of Valuation of Number of Valuedw Of Bulldi Buildings Housin g Housing g coO�cmin construction units units Orm wale IN Idl Itl IN 1 1 SVglo-ls mlly houses, detached Eiclude mobile homes. 101 2 2 165,680 Single- famlly houses, attached - Separated by ground to roof wa0, -Nit units above or befit w, end - Separate heating systems anR utility Metals- (000nt each unit as a separate building) 102 Two-famlly buildings 103 Thee- and /our - famlly bulleing, 104 RvO- CfAllare family buildings 106 TOTAL - Surnof 101 -105 —► 100 2 2 165,680 NEW RESIDENTIAL NON HOUSEKEEPING PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED W.berof Valuation of Number of Valuation of BUILDINGS Nu BuiWlrgs Rooms construction Omit cattle Buildings Rooms construction Omit cane dl Ibl Icl Idl (s) If) (g) Hotel., motels, and tourist (transient accommodations onlyi only) 213 Other nonhousekeeping shelter 214 NEW NONRESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLYOWNED Number Valuation of Number Valuation of BUILDINGS Item Na of buildings Construction Omit cane of buildings construction Omit cone Amusement, social, and recrestional LI 31 B Ibl Icl (dl 1.1 Churches and other reli ious 310 , Industrial 320 Parkin stage. Ibuildin a and Open decked) 321 Service stations and repair garage, 322 No.piels and institutional 323 Offices, banks, and profession.) 324 Public works and utilities 325 Schools and other educational 326 Stores and customer services 327 1 5,700,815 Other nonres'demial budd'ngs 328 3 3, 547 Stn cures other man bwc.,n s 3291 1 100 IE ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS, AND PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED Num be, ':a'valc^ C' Nu-te, Valuation of CONVERSIONS `DTI r c bu'ng3 con 5;ruci 7n Omit cents dr bulld'n s V coy'utt.o^ Omrt cents 4l Ibl Icl Idl lei Residential - Glassily addinon3 0l peregea antl camorts in item 436. 434 II f,on, es. omthm ant nonnouseneep,ny 437 3 ?86,373 A ddmens OI residential garages and caroorts l attached and detached) 438 1 6,720 S LC`:S - Uad COT 6 APRUC - l MOYI`•C '` 1 PLEASE CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE ,A I �2� DEMOLITIONS AND PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY U.Y NED - RAZING OF Item Number of Nar!er of BUILDINGS No. Ea^ irps Hous mg Hnas'rp Ifl Ibl IU' Idl tat Slrgle family houses (aCached and detached) 645 2 2 Two -Iam IV b d ndmgs 646 -aM !our- far+,q :uddnps 647 648 4II L:'er bu a ^as ^ecru. ^s — 16491 INDIVIDUAL PERMITS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION VALUED AT $500,000 OR MORE Please Provide the lollowirg mlormabon for each permit authorizing construction valued at $500,000 ar more entered in seciions l through IV. Item Number of No. fro. 0escri tion p Name and address of Owner ship Valuation of i sec. Sec. owner or builder .. Mark IXl construction Omit cants Houfin units g Building. 1 -IV one Iel (b7 Ic) let le7 III 1 7 Kind of Wilding Hrel tbach Construction Junior RS h School "_ " "--- '----- "------ --- - --- -- ❑Prmna Site addzw 326d 1365 South Grade Road E1Rosa MN 56325 15,700,815 _ 1 Kind of buikuy - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- - oPd.a4 - - - - -- Sb sddme , Kind of Wilding ❑MVats Sks sdhaw , KhM of tussling ---- ___— _- - -_ —__ ❑P,gate 1 Kind M buY6rp — ----- ❑P 1N.I. Sae Wd see Kind of W4Wq '- -- -- ❑Meats KYq of buWieq — ----- — _ --------- — ❑Priva4 514 sddrsu Katd of buWYlp oadysta - -_— _— Sb address Kind of i up — _— ___________________- ------- OPrIve4 ------- -- -------------- Si4 sddno P Comments i Are you aware of any new parmit•luuing Jurisdictions? No LYes - Please give additional information in comments. .. - L- lecnam James G. 11arKa n�ea code Number E.eonon e Building Off lets) 612 587 -5151 210 • MINUTES AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 30, 1989 Meeting called to order by Dave Skaar at 8:30 p.m. Members present John Miller, Dave Skaar, Dennis Kahl, and Mayor Paul Ackland. Members absent: Doug McGraw and Don Pankake. Motion made by John Miller, seconded by Dennis Kahl to extend to the Mayor and City Council and City Staff the commission's appreciation for the support they received concerning the construction of the 8 unit hangar building. Passed unanimously. Next meeting will be held on Monday, June 26th, 1989 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. Meeting Adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Submitted by Doug Meier 0 Police Commission Minutes The Police Commission met at 12:00 noon on May 2, 1989 at the Police Department. Present at the meeting were Commission members Jeff Haag, Delores Saar, Kevin Compton and Chief of Police Steven Madson. The goal of the meeting was to reduce the number of patrol officer applications to a manageable number to interview. The original 88 applicants had earlier been reduced to 32. Jeff asked Steve to give some insight as to what he is looking for in a police patrol officer. Steve responded that he felt it important that the person be extremely flexible and be willing to change as public policy changes. This person should understand the role they will be playing within the police department and the city, ano understand that there may be different management philosophies than what they are presently accustomed to. He also said they should be licensed or eligible to be licensed, and the Commissioners should also look at special abilities or credentials they may have over and above the minimum requirements. Steve also informed the members that according to affirmative action laws we are presently shy one female officer. The city's affirmative action plan requires that the Commission carefully consider any qualified female applicants. The members then selectea 11 candidates and set Wednesday, May 17th as the date for the interviews. The interviews will begin at 6:00 p.rrL A list of interview questions will oe developed prior to the 17th. The Commission indicated that they would like the assistance of a police sergeant and patrol officer at the interviews. The members approved a motion that the police secretary would be the official recorder for the Commission although Kevin is the official secretary. They requested that the secretary then send notification of the meetings to the media. In response to a question by Jeff regarding hiring additional part time police officers, Chief Madson advised that because of the full time position that we are filling, the field training officers would not be available to train part time officers so we will not pursue any additional hiring at this time. The meeting was adjourned at 1:30 p.m. ompton, Seoetary l__J Police Coamission Minutes A meeting of the Hutchinson Police Commission was held at the Hutchinson Police Department on 5- 17 -89. All members were present. Also present were Sergeant John Gregor and Officer Mike Hogan of the Hutchinson Police Department. The purpose of the meeting was to interview 11 applicants for the position of Police Patrolman. The Commission interviewed the following applicants: 1. Laurie Kluball 7. Randy Davis 2. Scott Kliest 8. Mark Shoutz 3. Michael Atkinson 9. Roger Bakken 4. Mark Dressen 10. Steve Mogard 5. Michelle Niederfelt 11. Steve Meier 6. Jeff Luhman Following the interview Sgt. Gregor and Officer Hogan left and the Police Commission deliberated. The Commission voted to :submit the following three names to the Chief of Police for consideration. Roger Bakken Mark Dressen Jeff Luhman They also recommended that the following names be placed on an eligibility roster. Michelle Niederfelt Steve Mogard Randy Davis Mark Shoutz The following were eliminated from any further consideration. Scott Kliest Laurie Kluball Mike Atkinson Steve Meier The Commission also discussed the applicants for the School Liaison position. The list of ten applicants was narrowed to the following six names: Kevin Langer Mike Bulzomi Jeff Kaping Bruce Lindgren Robert Swenson Jeff Harapat The above will be requested to attend an oral interview on June 14, 1989 at '/_a. (3 the Hutchinson Police Department. The interviews will begin at 6:00 p.m and each applicant will be allowed one half hour. The following applicants were eliminated from further consideration: Kevin Stenson Carl Zeidler Kelley Johnson Len Swanberg Chuck Jones The Commission requested that all applicants be notified by letter of their standings. The Commission indicated that they would like a member of the Hutchinson School District Administrative Staff, a member of the Hutchinson Fire Department and a member of the Hutchinson Police Department to assist at the interviews for Police School Liaison Officer. The meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. in Compton, cretary 0 0 E EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1989 AFFIDAVIT I - AM OVER 65 YEARS OF AGE, OR I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED B THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN; FAMILY SIZE ' k 2 INCOME $7,560 �, 5 $9,180 THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $11,05 FOR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE INIOULD IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION OF THE CHARGE TO $1,50, SIGNATUREZ °j2a STREET ADDRESS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY To: WATER DEPARTMENT DATE DATA CHANGE To; CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL ACTION; ACCOUNT NUMBE DATE APPROVED DISAPPROVED j~ • E PUBLISHED IN THE STHI HOTCH89SON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 1ST, 19899 AND ON NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 89 -13 Publication No. 3997 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 13th day of June, 1989, to review the Minnesota Department of Transportation plans for the improvement of T.H. 7 East from Approximately the Railroad Crossing by Rockite Silo to the East Corporate Limits by widening of roadway and reconstruction, concrete curb and gutter, driveway aprons, and appurtenances. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: May 30th, 1989 Ad, to @411 CitY)Administi3ator PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, I ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. �, \NNESOT4 1121 ?p �O yo Minnesota AS '2 D a Department of Transportation p 60X 768 1 APP 19£9 v n �y`� 2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD N R E OF TRP WILLMAR. MINNESOTA 56201 �. DEFERRED APRIL 25, 1989 April 20, 1989 Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, Mn 55350 Dear Gary: Enclosed are two copies of Layout 1A for the T.H. 7 road construction between 5th Ave. and 0.35 miles east of Carden Road. We are required to obtain approval from municipalities whenever we work within their city limits. Therefore, you will also find enclosed two copies of a resolution approving the layout. Please have the Council consider this resolution at the soonest scheduled meeting. If approved, please return one completed copy. If you have any questions please feel free to call me at (612) 231 -5499. Sincerely, / Mary G. Gieseke Assistant District Engineer Construction cc: J. W. Henslin K. F. Rasmussen, 511 C.G. P. C. Hughes 0 (CITY4302.TXT) An F.n ual Opporrunity £mploier � R E S O L U T I O N FOR LAYOUT APPROVAL At a meeting of the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, held on the _ day of . 1989, the following Resolution was offered by seconded by to wit: WHEREAS the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation has prepared a Preliminary layout for the improvement of a part of Trunk Highway Number 119 renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 7 within the corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson, frogs 5th Ave. N.E. to E. Corp. Limits; and seeks the approval thereof, and WHEREAS said preliminary layouts are on file to the Office of the Department of Transportation, Saint Paul, Minnesota, being marked, labeled, and Identified as Layout No. IA S.P. 4302 -36 (7119) from 5th Ave. N E to 0.35 ML E of Carden Road NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said preliminary layouts for the improvement of said Trunk Highway with the corporate limits be and hereby are approved. Upon the call of the roll the following Council Members voted in favor of the Resolution The following Council members voted against Its adoption: whereupon the Mayor and /or the presidia& officer declared the Resolution adopted. Dated _ 1989 Attest City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) as. COUNTY OF MCLEOD ) CITY OF HUTCN INSON ) I do hereby certify that at said meeting (of which due and legal notice was given) of the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, on the __ day of 1989, at which a majority of the members of said Council were present, the foregoiag resolution was adopted. Given under my hand and seal this day of 1989, City Clert RW2905AE.Rl YOUTH CENTER PURPOSE/1989 0 The Hutchinson Youth Center is being established to provide a chemi- cal /tobacco free environment for our area youth from 12 to 20 years of age. It is intended that activities offerred in this social setting will allow for positive interactions to occur between individuals in a safe and creative atmosphere. Our schools, churches, city recreation and parks departments provide many excellent programs for youth who chose to participate in athletics, music, drama, religion and other traditional extra - curricular activities. There are, however, many youth who chose not to be involved in existing structured programs, and those who do participate have expressed a need for an unstructured social setting. The Hutchinson Youth Center is becoming a community wide project. With continued hard work by the board of directors, the activites board (to be named), and the support of the city, this will become a successful venture. s �4 1989 -90 YOUTH CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS STUDENTS; Justin Barrick Mike Gilberston Dan Hawes Sharla Krueger John Kunze One additional to be named ADULTS: Meg Meilke Verne Meyer Jim Mills Doff Moon CONSULTANTS: Tom Dolder Jo Larson Steve Madson Gary Plotz Marlin Torgerson NOTE; The Activities Board to be activated at the earliest feasible date. PROPOSED FACILITY NAME- Approved by the Board of Directors on 6-5 -89 0 0 9 6th,7th,8th I subcommittee Youth Development planning Council "Spankyls" project Management Subcommittee Organizational structure Admini Board of Di YOUTH CTR. i i i [Activities Board[ 9th,10th grade lith,12th grade tech, young adult subcommittee 11subcommittee subcommittee Board of Directors 1. Composition: combination of youth and adult; "old" and "new" members to provide continuity and innovation; chosen through application process by current planning council. 2. Functions: a. Develop policies and procedures b. Approve rules and regulations C. Approve budget d. Oversee financial operations e. Develop goals and objectives f. Evaluate and review performance of paid and volunteer staff. g. Approve calendar of events h. Approve contracts, defer larger ones to City Council Activities Board •1. Composition: combination of youth and adult, plus subcommittes by age group. 2. Functions: a. Scheduling of entertainment and special or seasonal events b. Fundraising C. Publicity, public relations, and promotion d. Coordination of recreational activities, leagues, etc. e. Development of activities budget Note: Although this subcommittee set out to address only the management topic, other items as listed below came up in the discussion. The facility manager's role emerged as conducting the following functions: daily operational management, including financial; supervision of paid and volunteer staff; food and beverage management; responsibility for profit and loss management; promotion of activities in conjunction with Activities Board. 2. The group favored a reasonable membership fee, with an admission charge for non - members that would make a membership appear attractive. (Example: $10 membership fee for 6 month, $2 non - member admission per visit.) I* 1 POSITION DESCRIPTION - DRAFT 6 -6 -89 • TITLE YOUTH CENTER MANAGER jobdes7l 6 -99 ACCOUNTABLE TO CITY ADMINISTRATOR, CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY THIS 15 ADMINISTRATIVE WORK DIRECTING YOUTH CENTER ACTIVITIES DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES I Works with the board of directors (youth and adult) to promote activities at the youth center, 2 Prepares budget and monthly financial reports for board of directors. Approves all expenditures. Secures city council approval for expenditures exceeding $200. 3 Works with board of directors to develop rules and regulations for use of the center. Sees that regulations are enforced. 4 Plans, organizes and supervises the activities that are developed for the center, involving participants to the greatest degree possible. 5 Develops a monthly calendar of events with input from appropriate age subgroups. Submits calendar to board of directors for approval. 6 Sees that programs are marketed through appropriate media and /or presentations. 7 Involves civic organizations, service groups and interested individuals in support of youth programs, to include recruiting financial and in -kind contributions. 8 Serves as liaison with school, city and others to maximize communication with youth center. 9 Purchases supplies and food /snack items. Maintains inventory control on all items. 10 Encourages participation of volunteer workers at the center. Assumes responsibility for scheduling these workers and assigning supervisors for specific events and duties, to include custodial needs. 11 Performs related duties as required. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS Background in education, social work, youth counseling or related field. Strong interest and proven ability in working with youth. TERMS Duties include being present on premises during all hours of operation. Initially a month -to -month contract for services extending up to six months. Compensation approximately $1500 to $1800 per month. NOTE: Rules /regulations below are subject to modification as may be necessary. 0 YOUTH CENTER RULES /REGULATIONS Youth who are identified as using alcohol or other chemicals shall be immediately asked to leave the center and not allowed to return that day. 2. Youth intoxicated or under the influence of other chemicals shall have their parents notified. Parents will be given the opportunity to pick up their son/daughter at the center. If a parent cannot be reached or refuses to pick up their child, the youth will be turned over to the appropriate law enforcement agency. 3. Any youth that introduces alcohol or other controlled substances on the premises will be immediately turned over to the police. Smoking will not be allowed in the youth center. The use of any tobacco product in the center is strictly prohibited. 5. Profanity or other abusive language will not be permitted. 6. Fighting or acts of vandalism will result in appropriate disciplinary action. 7. Food, drink or loitering in the halfway area will not be permitted. 8. No parking will be allowed on the east side of the building. Inappropriate driving in the parking lot will result in disciplinary action and/or police notification. All rules /regulations apply when In the Hutch Bowl, parking lot and youth center complex. Disciplinary Action for Violation of Youth Center Rules /Regulations: 1st Offense: Membership suspended for one week. 2nd Offense: Membership suspended for one month and appear before the Board of Directors. 3rd Offense: Permanent suspension- May appeal to the Board of Directors. Management reserves the right to by -pass steps 1 & 2 for severe offenses. _e?• 0 UNITED WAY QUESTIONNAIRE - PAGE 5 Revenue 6 Expenses Fiscal 1989 - >3udgeted Jul 1 -Dec 31 Suppon III RevenU8-- All Sources 0000.69991 0000 Allocation From This United Way ................. 4000 Contributions ............................. 4200 SpectalEvenis .and.Cmdraiscrs ...... .......... 4300 Legacies a Bequests (Unrestricted) .............. 4600 Contributed by Associated Organizations ............. 4700 Notated by Other United Ways ................. 5000 Fees d Grams From Government Agencies ... 6000 Membership Dues ........................ .......... 6200 Program Services Fees 8 Net Incidental Revenue ..... atenats (.COi1Ce55.1df15,, COVCr,, ,gaest_ 6300 Sales of M m 6500 investment income ............................. rantsl 6900 Miscellaneous Revenue (foundational..g. . TOTAL SUPPORT 3 REVENUE (Add 1 thru 12) .. _ S 000 __ 1 000 0 0 2 ' 0 U 1L n $35 , 000 . 17000 -99991 Expenses 7000 Salaries - (AroSS) ........ ................... . 7100 Employee Benefits .. ............................... .. 7200 Payroa Taxes. sic . .............................. .. 8000 Professional Fees .......:........... ..... 9100 Supplies..( �onCe55wns.,,re4or?s.,,officel. .. 8200 Telephone ........................ . ........ ... .... 300 Postage d Shipping ................,...........1 3400 Occupancy (rent,.UtaueS,. ..insurance 3500 Rental d maintenance of Equipment ...................... 3600 Printing; Publications ............................ 3700 Travel .......... ............................... _ . 3600 Conferences. Conventions 6 Meetings ............. 3900 Spetdit Assistance to Incirvauats ............... 2000 Membersmp Dues 1100 Awards d Grants ........................ ?400 Mrscellaneous4(Start.up CoStS.-.195q).. TOTAL EXPENSES (Add 14 th►u 29) ................. ... (691 Payments to Allilrated Organizations .......... . 9oard Designations for Spec lied ACirvrlres for Fviure vears _ TOTAL EXPENSES FOR BUDGET PERIOD FOR ALL ACTIVITIES (30 + 31 + 32) ..................... TOTAL EXPENSES FOR ACTIVITIES FINANCED BY RESTRICTED FUNDS ................ $ 12,On0 i Orin I 'non - 5n 18,860 300 0 0 0 0 0 ' r S 35 , Onn 0 ROTAL EXPENSES FOR ACTIVITIES FINANCED BY UNRESTRICTED FUNDS (33 - 34) .. .... $35, non EXCESS (DEFICIT) OF TOTAL SUPPORT & REVENUE OVER EXPENSES (13 - 35) .................... '500 00 Depreciation of Buildings d Equipment .......... .... .. . Mapr Probeny 8 Equipment Acquisition (s 1000 ) v utchinson toAssembly of (!god Highway 7/22 West a Route 5, Box 87 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 Telephone: 612- 587.2074 June 1, 1989 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55330 Attn: Marilyn Swanson Administrative Secretary Dear Marllyn: Was Vagle, Pastor Tom Johnson, Assistant Pastor �`i989 gY� ZD I We would like to seek the approval of the City Council to reserve the i bandshell for a concert on July 30, 1989 from 7:00 pm to 10:00 pm. Please get back to us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Wes Vagle Pastor WDV /pk 0 — Come (groin With Us — i Donohue March 30, 1989 City of Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attn: Mr. Randy DeVries Director of Water and Wastewater Re: Engineering Services Proposal Pilot Plant Study Dear Mr. DeVries: 6b .' A M#W 1999 As a follow -up to the discussion we have had about 3M's request to discharge volatile organics to Hutchinson's Sanitary Sewer System, we are pleased to submit this Engineering Services Proposal for the evaluation of affects such discharges may have on the City of Hutchinson's Wastewater Facility. Donohue brings significant experience and expertise to conducting treatability studies. We have performed treatability studies for American Chem, Marinett, Wisconsin, on mixed organics, and American Potato, Plover, Wisconsin, on potato starch waste. We have also completed plant evaluations and plant design in New Lime, Ohio, for a wastewater plant handling groundwater contaminated with high levels of mixed organics. In general, the evaluation proposed for the City of Hutchinson is intended to identify any new NPDES discharge limits that may be placed on the City's wastewater plant, new limits on sludge for agricultural use, wastewater treatment plants ability to treat wastewater containing the organics proposed for discharge by 3M, cost to the City for treating the organics and estimated increased BOD loadings to the plant caused by 3M discharge. The details of the proposed work are presented below: Scone of Services As part of the evaluation, Donohue proposes to: 1. Arrange up to two meetings with the MPCA to discuss regulatory impacts that accepting 3M discharge will have on the wastewater treatment plant's discharge permit and sludge application rates on agricultural land. Donohue will attend the meetings with a representative from the City of Hutchinson. 2. Arrange one meeting with 3M to discuss the amount of their participation in this evaluation. Donohue will attend the meeting with a representative from the City of Hutchinson. Donohue & Associates, Inc. 7200 Hemlock Lane North, Suite 200 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Engineers & Architects 612- 425 -2181 Donohue Mr. Randy DeVries March 30, 1989 Page 2 3. Advise the City on the practicality of proceeding with a pilot plant study after attending meetings with the MPCA. 4. Design a pilot plant treatability study for sanitary waste containing methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, cyclohexanone and xylene at concentrations expected to be received at the City's wastewater treatment plant. Influent organic concentrations will be based on the proposed discharges from 3M as outlined in the attached letter from Mr. Wayne H. Neumann dated' January 25, 1989. The pilot plant treatability study design will include operating procedures, sampling procedures, and log sheets for collecting operating data. 5. Provide bench scale pilot plant equipment. 6. Provide one day of training on operating of the pilot plant, and on study procedures. 7. Provide chemical analyses for methyl ethyl ketone, toluene, cyclohexanone and xylene in a total of 12 samples. 8. Provide 30 soluble COD analyses. 9. Observe pilot plant operation and make suggestions for optimizing operation. 10. Prepare a report which evaluates potential effects of 3M proposed organic discharge on operation of the City's wastewater treatment facilities. Report will consider effect on the City's wastewater treatment facilities effluent, waste sludge, influent loading and operating costs. The report will also estimate amount of operating cost to be recovered through increased sewer charges caused by the organic discharge from 3M. 11. Provide the City with ten copies of the evaluation report and meet with the City to review its contents. City's Responsibilities 1. Provide personnel to operate the bench scale pilot plant which will be located at the Hutchinson Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Personnel will need to operate the bench scale plant 7 days a week for a minimum of one month. a. Required operating daily duties will include filling and emptying reservior tanks, adjusting pumping and air flow rates, collecting samples, taking dissolved oxygen readings, recording readings, house keeping chores around pilot plant area and cleaning miscellaneous bottles. Donohue Mr. Randy DeVries March 30, 1989 Page 3 b. Required laboratory analyses well include BOD, total suspended solids (TSS), mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS), total solids (TS). BOD and TSS will be performed on pilot plant influent and effluent three times a week. MLSS and MUSS will be performed five times a week. IS will be performed on waste sludge once a week. BOD and TSS will be performed on filtrate from waste sludge once a week. 2. Provide Donohue with results of laboratory analysis and daily operating data. 3. Inform Donohue of any pilot plant equipment malfunctions or plant upsets. Pilot Plant Test Run Period The pilot plant test run period will be concluded by a maximum of 60 days after the first batch of wastewater is introduced into the pilot plant. Timine Immediately upon receiving authorization to proceed, Donohue will establish meetings with the MPCA. Based upon discussions with the MPCA and recommendation by Donohue, the City will make a decision whether or not to proceed with the pilot plant study. Within two weeks of authorization to proceed with the pilot plant study, Donohue will provide procedures for conducting the pilot plant study and start the pilot plant within four weeks of authorization. The evaluation report will be provided within eight weeks of the conclusion of the pilot plant test run. Our proposal anticipated that intial authorization for Donohue to proceed will occur within four months of the date of our proposal. If initial authorization is delayed beyond four (4) months, estimated costs and compensation may have to be adjusted. Compensation Compensation for the services described in this letter shall be on an hourly basis in accordance with the Engineer's hourly fees in effect at the time the services are performed. The Engineer will bill the City monthly for the actual services provided for the project by the staff members involved plus other expenses incidental to the project such as meals, mileage, and other direct expenses incurred. The Engineer's billings will provide a breakdown of services rendered according to the Engineer's standard job classification, and the monthly billings will summarize the charges incurred. The City agrees to pay the Engineer within 30 days of the billing date. The City further agrees that payments to the Engineer which exceed the contract payment period specified herein shall be subject to the payment of interest by the City to the Engineer in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 471.425 Subpart 4. Donohue Mr. Randy DeVries March 30, 1989 Page 4 The estimated total fee for services described herein is $12,400. The Engineer agrees that this total fee for services will not be exceeded without written approval of the City. The Engineer's hourly fees charged will be fair and reasonable for the professional service rendered. Change of Scope If services different from those stated in this letter agreement are required of the Engineer as a result of subsequent investigations, changes in regulatory agency requirements of interpretations, or upon the direction of the City, the Engineer and the City agree to renegotiate this agreement. Any additional services and compensation shall be negotiated and the Engineer shall not proceed with the additional services until approved by the City. Authorization and Acceptance This letter has been prepared in duplicate as a letter agreement between Donohue and the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota. As an indication of acceptance of the scope of services, compensation for same set forth herein, and attached general terms and conditions. We would appreciate return of one copy of this letter executed by the City below. We are appreciative of being selected by the City of Hutchinson for this evaluation. We look forward to the opportunity of providing our services and to working with the City. If the City has any additional questions on this letter or desires any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, DONO SSOCIATES, INC. Michael P. Hoff, E. Vice President M /P /BC2 City acceptance of letter agreement: City Clerk Date 0 9 is 3M Environmental Engineering and Pollution Control PO Box 33331 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 -3331 612!778 4791 n January 25, 1989 `�c ^,,rtcl�`�o`% Subject: 3m Hutchinson Magnetic Media Division Solvent Recovery Wastewater Mr. Richard B. Ford Operations Specialist Donohue 6 Associates 7200 Hemlock Lane N., Suite 200 Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 Dear Mr. Ford: is I am sorry this letter took so long in reaching you. I enjoyed meeting you last Thursday at Hutchinson and appreciated the opportunity to prresent to you our plans for reducing our volatile emissions from our manufacturing plant. As you recall, you asked me at that meeting to write a letter explaining what the anticipated composition of the wastewater which we would like to sewer from this process. The attached sketch is the same as the one I handed out in the meeting we had. It shows that we will normally run the wastewater into a cooling tower as makeup water. This will provide some stripping of volatile hydrocarbons from the water. The hydrocarbons left to go to the city sewer will be primarily methyl ethyl ketone, with minor amounts of toluene, cyclohexanone, and possibly xylene. We expect the normal flow to be about 10 to 15 gpm, with a hydrocarbon concentration anywhere from 100 to 1200 mg /l. We would anticipate the concentration to be on the lower end.of this range. In the event the wastewater is diverted around the cooling tower, the discharge to the sewer would be about 80 gpm, with a hydrocarbon concentration of less than 200 mg /1. During our meeting, you indicated that it may be possible to set up a bench scale test to determine the effect of the proposed wastewater on the city's Mr. R. B. Ford Page 2 January 25, 1989 activated sludge system. As you pointed out in the meeting, activated sludge systems can usually adapt over a period of time to handle a routine solvent loading with little or no detrimental performance to the overall treatment efficiency. We would like to work closely with you in the preparation and implementation of this bench scale study. Please let me know if there is any additional information which you need. i can be reached at (612) 778 -5224. Sincerely, Wayne H. Neumann Environmental Engineering cc: Mr. R. DeVries, Dir. of Water/Wastewater Operations - City of Hutchinson Mr. Gene Anderson, City Engineer - City of Hutchinson 0 0 1 9 TO Cl TREA' 0 SOLVENTS FOR SOLVENT VAPOR RECOVERY -10 - 15 GPM P ? PPM 3M Environmental Engineering and Pollution Control PO Box 33331 St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 -3331 612/778 4791 June 7, 1989 Subject: 3M Hutchinson City Wastewater Treatment Study Mr. Randy DeVries Director of Water and Wastewater City of Hutchinson City Hall 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. DeVries: After reviewing the Engineering Services Proposal from Donohue 6 Associates to you dated March 30, 1989, 3M would like to offer to subsidize $8000 of the study, feeling that roughly 2/3 of the costs for the study are related to 3M's request to discharge low concentrations of volatile organics to the city sewer system as a result of the installation of new pollution control equipment. This offer is made with the stipulation that representatives from 3M meet with you and Donohue personnel to discuss in detail the scope of the pilot study and what the criteria will be for what is and isn't acceptable treatment for those wastes proposed for discharge to your system. If you have any questions concerning our offer, please call me at (612) 778 -5224. Sincerely, Wayne H. Neumann Environmental Engineer 0 11 9 ,e, (612) 587 -5151 F CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 7, 1989 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: Randy DeVries, Director of Water & Wastewater Operations ------------------------ - - - - -- SUBJECT: — Engineering proposal from 3 -M - - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I recommend that we enter into the Engineering agreement with Donohue and Associates, and accept the $8,000 from 3 -M to subsidize the project. The Wastewater Treatment Plant can be upset by certain types of chemicals and metals. To insure that this would not happen, we need to run the pilot study first. Donohue and Associates has the experience in the type of work, and know our treatment plant. There is money in our budget for this type of work. We have had in the past a very good working relationship with 3 -M, and I feel that this would enhance that working relationship. RD /ds 0 0 MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC SI.CIA,STS IN CMA11T[I111f VIf IOM AND ORDINANCE CODIFICATION EXCLUSIVELY FOR uwNEEOTA GOVERNMENTAL UNITS Mr. G. Barry Anderson City Attorney 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Barry: 7400 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 Area Code 612 869 -2403 May 16, 1989 t�9Ay 135;: mt a'V �i1 w r r-tc Enclosed is a suggested draft of the ordinance adopting the codi- fication together with a Notice of Availability which you are required to publish in accordance with Charter Section 3.11. As discussed at the post -draft conference, we have projected a July 1 effective date which has been inserted in Section 3 of the ordinance. Anticipating that we will have responses to our inquiries regarding the various staff comments within the next two weeks, we will begin printing the master draft by June 1. As soon as print -out has been completed and we have a page count, we will submit a quote to the City from a local printer for fifty sets. Selection of the printer should be decided upon by the City at its earliest opportunity since copies should be available for general distribution by the first publication date of the Notice. The latest possible dates for publication of the Notice would be June 16 and 23. The ordinance adopting the codification should be introduced at the first Council meeting in June and adopted at the secono, meeting if that will allow ample time to have the ordinance published prior to July 1. If you anticipate any problems with the above schedule, please get in touch with us. Very truly yours, MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. Lorraine E. O'Reilly, Codifier LO /ag Encls. c: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator !/ with enclosures NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF COPIES OF REVISED AND CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that copies of the revised and codified ordinances of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, known as the CITY CODE, are available at the office of the City Administrator in the City Hall in the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, for general distribution to the public at a reasonable charge. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN, that said CITY CODE contains provisions and revisions not previously published or contained in an ordinance. DATED at Hutchinson, Minnesota, this 7th day of . June , 1989 City Administrator (Printed in the Hutchinson Leader on June 13 and June 20 , 19 89 /74' ORDINANCE NO. 1, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A REVISION AND CODIFICATION WITH CERTAIN ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS, OF ALL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED IN MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 415.021, EXCEPT SUCH ORDINANCES AS ARE NUMBERED AND CITED IN THE TEXT OF CHAPTERS 1 THROUGH 10 AND CHAPTERS 12 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS REFERENCE LEGISLATION), AND ALSO EXCEPT SUCH ORDINANCES AS ARE DESCRIBED IN THE CATEGORIES LISTED IN CHAPTER 20, (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS SPECIAL LEGISLATION); ESTABLISHING A NAME FOR SAID CODIFICATION, MEANS OF CITATION, EFFECTIVE DATE, NOTICE AND PRINTING PROCEDURE, SPECIFICATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS; AND, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Adoption. All ordinances of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, heretofore adopted, except such ordinances as are numbered and cited in the text of Chapters 1 through 10 and Chapters 12 through 14, inclusive, and also except such ordinances as are categorized in Chapter 20, should be and are hereby revised, codified, and adopted as set forth in that certain document known as the CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, pursuant to authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 41.5.021. Section 2. Citation. The CITY CODE may be cited as "City Code, Sec. Section 3. Effective Date, Printing and Notice of Availability. The CITY CODE shall be effective on July 1, 1969. The City Administrator shall cause said CITY CODE to be printed in looseleaf form and copies thereof in a substantial quantity made available for distribution to the public at a reasonable charge, the exact quantity, charge, and printing specifications to be more specifically determined by the City Council. The City Administrator shall cause Notice of Availability of copies to be published in the official newspaper for at least two (2) successive weeks prior to such effective date, which notice shall state that copies of the CITY CODE are available at his office for general distribution to the public at a reasonable charge. Section 4. Prima Facie Evidence. Such codification, known as the CITY CODE, is hereby declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota. Section 5. Effective Date and Preservation of Rights and Obligations. This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption, provided, however, that the adoption of such CITY CODE shall not affect or impair any act done, right vested or accrued, proceeding, suit or prosecution commenced, prior to such effective date and under ordinance provisions then in effect, but the same shall survive to a conclusion thereof. It being the express intent of this Section that no offense committed, liability, penalty or forfeiture, civil or criminal, under ordinance provisions in effect prior to the effective date of the CITY CODE be in any way affected by the adoption thereof. Section 6. Penalty. Every person violates the CITY CODE when he intentionally performs an act therein prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be sentenced as for a misdemeanor to not more than ninety (90) days or a fine of not more than $700.00, or both, or, as for a petty misdemeanor, sentence of a fine of not more than $200.00. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, on the 27th day of June , 19 89 APPROVED: Mayor Seal Attest: City Administrator (Publication in the Hutchinson Leader on the 29th day of June , 19 89 -2- 0 0 ORDINANCE NO. 89 -02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -3 Multiple Family Residence to C -4 Fringe Commercial District. Lot 1, Block 1 of Casa Addition and Lots 1 & 2, Block of of Rolling Oaks 2nd Addition City of Hutchinson Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • Paul L. Ackland Mayor 74'- 0 ORDINANCE NO. 89 -03 AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT IN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF CASA ADDITION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and it was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to vacate said ease- ment. SECTION 2. That certain easement is hereby described as follows: The Southerly 6' utility easement of the Easterly 119.0' of the Westerly 125.00' of Lot 1, Block 1 in Casa Addition SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication and upon filing certified copy thereof with the proper County • officers as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of June, 1989. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 9010 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Nalco 7393 6,554 Water Treatment Water Yes Nalco Chemical Co. Diesel Fuel 1,019 Operating Fuel Street Yes Schmeling Oil Co. Meters 1,135 Resale Water Yes Water Products Co. Radio /Pager 1,611 Replacement Fire * Motorola Comm. *Replacement of radio to t - sel - insurance; Pager $ from saLe of o d pagers. The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM I COST Date Approved: June 13, 1989 *lotion made by: Seconded by: DEPT. J BUDGET I VENDOR Resolution submitted for Council action by: 7 —?t ' June 7, 1989 FRECEIZ Mr. Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue WestHutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Quade/Lake Parking Lot Proposal Our File No.: 3188 -87 -0001 Dear Gary: On Tuesday, June 6, 1989, the City Engineer and I met with Skip Quade to discuss the purchase of his property which of course, as you know, adjoins the Emma Lake property, for the purpose of expanding parking availability for downtown businesses. Mr. Quade is interested principally in selling the business and while he does not rule out the possibility of a lease, he would prefer to transfer the fee interest in the property to the City of Hutchinson in exchange for payment representing the fair market value of the property. I suggest the fairest and most appropriate way to proceed in this matter is to have an appraiser appraise the property for the purpose of determining its fair market value and at that point the council can make a decision as to whether or not it wishes to make the commitment to buy the property or whether it would prefer to lease it. My best guess at this time is that an appraisal will likely cost the City somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 to $500. I suggested that this matter be placed on the agenda for further action. r=a ARNOLD & McDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAw DAVID B. ARNOLD 5681 GEDAR LAKE ROAD OF COUNSEL CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-1492 WILLIAM W. CAMERON GARY D. M�DOWELL PAUL D. DOVE STEVEN A. ANDERSON (612) 545 -9000 G. BARRY ANDERSON MN TOLL FREE 800- 343-4545 STEVEN S. HOGE 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371 LAURA K. FRETLAND (912) 080-2214 DAVID A. BHUEGGEMANN TELECOPIER (912)545 -1>93 TELECOPIER(012) 388 -5500 JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY 101 PARK PLACE JULIA A. CHRISTIANS HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 RICHARD G. McGEE (812)58 > ->5>5 TELECOPIER(612) 567-4096 June 7, 1989 FRECEIZ Mr. Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue WestHutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Quade/Lake Parking Lot Proposal Our File No.: 3188 -87 -0001 Dear Gary: On Tuesday, June 6, 1989, the City Engineer and I met with Skip Quade to discuss the purchase of his property which of course, as you know, adjoins the Emma Lake property, for the purpose of expanding parking availability for downtown businesses. Mr. Quade is interested principally in selling the business and while he does not rule out the possibility of a lease, he would prefer to transfer the fee interest in the property to the City of Hutchinson in exchange for payment representing the fair market value of the property. I suggest the fairest and most appropriate way to proceed in this matter is to have an appraiser appraise the property for the purpose of determining its fair market value and at that point the council can make a decision as to whether or not it wishes to make the commitment to buy the property or whether it would prefer to lease it. My best guess at this time is that an appraisal will likely cost the City somewhere in the neighborhood of $300 to $500. I suggested that this matter be placed on the agenda for further action. r=a Mr. Gary D. Plotz June 7, 1989 Page 2 If you have any questions in connection with any of the foregoing, you should certainly feel free to contact me. Very trulteson ARNOLD & G. Barry GBA /lls cc: Marlo V. Priebe 0 9 NORTH FRANKLIN STREET PARKING LOT ESTIMATE LOT 768 iTotal Cost $ 6,739.00 Outside Contractor costs $ 520.00 Cost to City for Class 5 $ 855.00 Out of Budget Expense Total $1,375.00 0 Total Remove 3 trees and prune 4 trees $ 260.00 Backhoe to remove tree stumps and misc. Outside contractor backhoe 8 hrs. @ concrete $65.00 /Hr. $ 520.00 Front end loader 32 hrs. @ $75.00 /Hr. $ 2,400.00 3 Trucks 48 hrs. @ $35.00 /Hr. $ 1,680.00 Grader 4 hrs. @ $70.00 /Hr. $ 280.00 300 Yard of Class 5 Gravel @ $2.85 /yard $ 855.00 Skid steer loader 8 hrs. @ $45.00 $ 360.00 Nan hours total of 128 hours of which 96 hours are equiment hours that include operator. This leaves a balance of 32 hours of man hours at an average hourly wage of $12.00 /hour. $ 384.00 iTotal Cost $ 6,739.00 Outside Contractor costs $ 520.00 Cost to City for Class 5 $ 855.00 Out of Budget Expense Total $1,375.00 0 r (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: May 19, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official RE: Flood Damage Reduction Grant Program Enclosed is an application for a 50/50 cost share Flood Damage Reduction Grant Program from the M.D.N.R. for up to $75,000.00. Please review and direct the appropriate department director to complete and submit prior to August 31, 1989, if you feel the City can financially handle a 50% cost and feel Hutchinson is in need of Flood Hazard Reduction Assistance. • Please note that acquisition /relocation funds appear to be available for properties in the Flood Plain. / /wa r-Q' 27me4s G. Marks Building Official JGM /pv enc. cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Marlow V. Priebe, City Engineer E 4, ��nn ^^nn 2STATE OF /� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES P.O. BOX 457, SPICER, MN 56288 PHONE NO. (612)796 -6271 May 18, 1989 City of Hutchinson C/O Jim Marks 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Marks: RE: FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM FILE NO. Enclosed are some materials describing the Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Assistance Program established during the 1987 Minnesota Legislative Session under the laws of Minnesota Chapter 306, Section 3 -5. This program is regulated thru MDNR Division of Waters on a 50/50 cost share basis up to $75,000 with local units of government. Also, enclosed is an application which must be submitted to this office prior to August 31, 1989. Please respond promptly to this office indicating your intentions regarding this program. Should you desire further information or assistance in completing the application, I would be glad to meet with you at any time before August 31. Completing the application does not ensure that a grant will be received nor does it commit your community to any type of proposal. Again, I remind you to submit your application as soon as possible. As we are using the previous years application form, please ignore the dates stated on the form and use August 31, 1989 as the deadline. Please feel free to contact myself or Area Hydrologist, Skip Wright, at the above listed number if you have any questions. Sincerely, lDDII /V�I_SI N OF WATERS �N Tim Crocker Staff Hydrologist TC:bf c: Ray Nyberg, Regional Hydrologist Skip Wright, Area Hydrologist AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 0 11 IrSTATE OF DEPARTMENT HCSXO'4La� OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX .500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155.40 ONR INFORMATION (612) 7966157 October 30, 1987 Dear Local Government Officials: In 1987 legislation was approved to establish a DNR technical and financial assistance program to help local government units reduce flood damages. This technical and grant assistance program is being administered by the DNR Division of Waters. The Division of Waters is now ready to accept applications for funding assistance and to provide technical assistance to local government units to plan for and implement flood damage reduction measures. The purpose of this letter and the attachments to it are to provide: I. Information about the Flood Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. 2. An application for grant assistance. • 3. Examples of Eligible Projects. 4. Criteria to be used by the DNR to evaluate all grant applications. If you are interested in developing a program or project for reducing flood damages please read the attached materials and then contact the DNR Area Hydrologist for assistance in developing your project and your grant application. Grant applications will be accepted by the Regional Hydrologists until December 31, 1987. Applicants will be notified about the status of their application by February 15, 1988. It is anticipated that successful applicants will receive their funding on or about March 31, 1988 with a second disbursement on or about September 15, 1988. It is hoped that this program will help to provide a permanent solution to many of our persistent flooding problems. If you have questions, please contact your Area Hydrologist or Joe Gibson, Floodplain Management Supervisor at (612) 296 -2773. Sincerely, DIVIS OF WATERS Ron Na rgang Director RN /JG:tjb AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 4. FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 0 What is the program? During the 1987 Legislative Session, Laws of Minnesota Chapter 306 Sections 3 -5 established within the Department of Natural Resources a flood hazard mitigation program to provide state technical and financial assistance to local government units for conducting flood damage reduction studies and for planning and implementing structural and non - structural flood damage reduction measures. What flood hazard mitigation measures are eligible for funding assistance? Financial assistance may be available for conducting flood damage reduction studies and for planning and implementing structural and non - structural measures including: dams, dikes, levees, flood bypass channels, flood storage and retardation structures, water level control structures, acquisition of floodplain lands, relocations, floodproofing, development of flood warning systems and evacuation procedures, adoption and enforcement of land use control ordinances and building codes, signs and other notifications of regional flood areas, provision of flood insurance and public education. What measures are not eligible for funding assistance? Certain measures are excluded from this program including deepening or straightening existing stream channels, cleaning out public ditches and clearing and snagging natural watercourses. is Who may apply for funding assistance? Applications for financial assistance must be made by a local government unit including a county, statutory or home rule charter city, town, watershed district or lake improvement district. Financial assistance is not available directly to individuals, companies or corporations. How much financial assistance is available? The Department of Natural Resources may award grants up to $75,000. Grants for more than $75,000 must be submitted for consideration by the governor and the legislature before each odd numbered year. Grants awarded under this program may not exceed one -half of the total cost of the proposed flood damage reduction project. Now are grant requests evaluated? Grants are to be based on the following considerations: 1. the extent and effectiveness of mitigation measures already implemented by the local government requesting the grant; 2. the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures and the associated non -flood related benefits and detriments; 3. the level of grant assistance that should be provided to the local government, based on available facts regarding the nature, extent, and severity of flood problems; 9 %� 4, the frequency of occurrence of severe flooding that has resulted in declarbtion of the area as a flood disaster area by the President of the United States; 5. the economic, social, and environmental benefits and detriments of the proposed mitigation measures; 6. whether the floodplain management ordinance or regulation adopted by the local government meets the minimum standards established by the commissioner, the degree of enforcement of the ordinance or regulation, and whether the local government meets the minimum standards established by the commissioner, and whether the local government is complying with the ordinance or regulation; 7. the degree to which the grant request is consistent with local water plans developed under chapters 1106 and 112 and sections 273.875 to 473.883; 8. The financial capability of the local government to solve its flood hazard problems without financial assistance; and 9. the estimated cost and method of financing of the proposed mitigation measures based on local money and federal and state financial assistance. The DNR is required to prioritize all grant requests according to the above considerations. 0 When will the flood hazard mitigation grant funds be distributed? Applications for grants this biennium will be accepted until December 31, 1987 by DNR Regional Hydrologists. One half of the available funds will be distributed by March 31, 1988. The other one half of the funds will be distributed by September 15, 1988. The same applications will be used for both of these funding cycles. nce to Contact your local DNR Area Hydrologist. The Area Hydrologist will be able to help you evaluate your flooding problems and may have ideas about how to best solve your flooding problems. The area hydrologist may also be able to suggest improvements to the application before it is submitted for the formal review process. A list of Regional Hydrologists, Area Hydrologists and their locations is attached. If you want general information about the program please contact: Joe Gibson Supervisor - Flood Plain Management Unit Department of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 -4032 (612) 296 -2773 Flood Damage Reduction Pro tect Evaluation Criteria The following are criteria that will be used to rate each application for flood damage reduction funding assistance. No actual scoring mechanism will be used but the criteria will be used to make detailed comparisons among applications. Have floods been caused by: Lakes? Streams? Ponding Areas? Storm Sewers? High Groundwater Levels? Overland Flow? Some combination of the above? Have floods caused loss of lives or posed health and safety problems? Have flood damaged residences /farmsteads? Have floods damaged businesses? Have floods damaged public facilities /utilities? Have floods damaged commercial /industrial facilities? Have floods damaged agricultural or other rural lands? Has the local government been designated in a Presidential Disaster Declaration? Does the local government have a floodplain /shoreland management ordinance? Does the local government adequately enforce the ordinance? Has the local government conducted public information or education programs about floods? Has the local government taken actions in the past to mitigate the effect of flooding? Does the local goverment unit participate in the National Flood Insurance Program? Has the local government advised residents that flood insurance is available? Does the local government enforce the State Building Code? Will the proposed project have benefits other than flood damage reduction benefits such as: Fish habitat? Wildlife habitat? Recreation? Water supply? Some combination of the above? Will the pro osed project have major environmental impacts such as: Wetland habitat destruction? Upland habitat destruction? Rare and endangered species? Some combination of the above? Will the proposed project have major social impacts such as: Neighborhood disruption? Transportation disruption? Aesthetics? Some combination of the above? Do the benefits of the proposed project exceed the costs? Will the proposed project reduce flood damages for major floods (i.e. 100 year)? Will the proposed project reduce flood damages for more frequent floods (i.e. 10 year)? Will the proposed project reduce flood damages for very frequent floods (i.e. 2 year)? Will the proposed project reduce flood damages caused by high lake levels? Have applicable local, state and federal permits been applied for? Have applicable local, state and federal permits been approved and issued? Have necessary lands, easements and rights of way been acquired? Does the proposed project have local support? Are local. matching funds currently or imminently available? Is the projected state share of the cost of the project under $75,000? Is an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment Worksheet required for the project? Has an EIS or EAW been completed if it is required? Have alternative flood damage reduction measures been considered? Has the most feasible flood damage reduction alternative been selected? Have non - structural solutions been considered and /or implemented? Have flood prone structures within the city or county been inventoried? Is the local government participating in a local water planning effort? Does the local government have a storm water management plan that is being . implemented? Does the local government have a flood warninn system and /or emergency evacuation plan? Does the proposed project involve the relocation of structures out of the floodway? Does the local government have an emergency levee and an emergency plan of action? Does the proposed project involve the relocation of structures out of the 100 year regulatory floodplain? Does the proposed project involve floodproofing structures located in the floodplain? Is the proposed project a study to identify potentially feasible flood damage reduction measures? Does the project involve measures to protect or improve highways or other transportation facilities? Does the proposed project involve the use of state owned lands? If the project proposes dams or flood storage or retardation structures, is a permanent conservation pool proposed? Does the proposed project involve stream clearing or snagging, ditch cleanouts or stream channel deepening or straightening? Does the proposed project involve acquisition of lands in the regulatory floodway or 10 year floodplain? Does the proposed project involve structural measures such as dams, dikes, levees, bypass channels, flood storage or retardation structures or water level control structures? Will the proposed project cause additional flood damages in upstream or downstream areas? 0 0 Examples of Eligible Projects - The flood damage reduction grant assistance program is designed to mitigate damages due to flooding within rural and urban floodplain and shoreland areas. - Structural and non - structural mitigation measures are eligible for funding assistance. - Several categories of eligible projects are identified below. - Eligible projects have been grouped as generally receiving high -, medium -, or low - priority. - Each project proposal will however be prioritized on its own merit. - This list is not all inclusive. - Innovative proposals are encouraged. HIGH PRIORITY I. Projects primarily intended to reduce the flood- related risk to human life and health: - improved community flood warning and emergency evacuation measures, • - relocation of dwellings out of flash flood areas, - emergency response plans for communities with emergency levees. 2. Proposals to relocate public and private structures out of the high risk /frequently flooded areas (i.e., floodway or 10 -year floodplain high lake levels areas). 3. Projects which have the potential for very high benefits to costs: - improved flood warning and emergency response measures, - minor structural measures (levees, water level controls, bypass channels) which would protect many buildings (most major flood control measures would not fall under this category), - emergency floodproofing measures. 4. Post Disaster Measures - implement post disaster measures that achieve long term damage reduction, - develop community post flood disaster mitigation plans as required by elements of the Federal regulations for disaster assistance. 5. Feasibility studies for any of the above project types of development of an integrated community wide flood damage reduction plan of action. MEDIUM PRIORITY . 1. Projects intended to assist communities in better regulating existing or new floodplain development: - improved mapping or elevation reference marks; - flood prone structure inventory; - signing of the floodplain; - technical studies to accurately determine or redetermine flood elevation and floodplain delineation. 2. Acquisition of flood prone lands - priority would be given to the purchase of lands in the regulatory floodway or 10 -year floodplain. 3. Relocation of public or private structures and facilities out of the regulatory floodway or 10 -year floodplain. 4. Floodproofing of public and private facilities (design and implementation): - permanent closure of low openings - elevating furnace, utilities, etc. - elevating structure - temporary closures 5. Structural measures - physical actions taken to modify the behavior and extent of floods: - dams - dikes - levees - bypass channels - flood storage and retardation structures - water level control structures. 6. Public Education - radio /television broadcasts. - insert in water bills instructing residents of the proper action to take in the event of a flood warning. - sponsorship of a seminar to assist homeowners in floodproofing their home. 7. Feasibility studies for any of the above project types. 8. Comprehensive watershed studies - urban and rural. - identify feasible options to reduce flooding, - improved management. LOW PRIORITY 1. Structural ro.ects intended to reduce the flooding of rural undeveloped ands exc us ve y. 2. Projects that would solely protect highway /transportation facilities. NOT TO BE FUNDED I. Cleaning of public ditches. 2. Clearing and snagging natural watercourses. . 3. Deepening or straightening existing stream channels. APPLICATION FOR FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT ASSISTANCE Local overnment n t ate Address Zip o e ontact Person Title hone s N um Fe r Estimated roject Cost Grant Amount Requested NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS Local governments should work with their respective Area Hydrologists to develop grant applications and submit them to the Regional Hydrologist no later than December 31, 1987. Successful applicants will be notified by February 15, 1988. One half of the appropriated funds will be distributed by March 31, 1988 and the other one half by September 15, 1988. The following 12 questions must be filled out in a manner that will allow for an evaluation of the application and allow for a comparison of your application with all other applications. Applications that are incomplete or provide inadequate information will-not be considered during the current funding cycle. If engineering or planning studies have been completed that provide the answers to questions 1 -5, the application may reference the appropriate pages of the report, provided that a copy of the report accompanies the application. Questions 6 -12 must be completed on the application forms provided. Additional pages may be attached to fully answer Questions 1 -12. Applications that are incomplete or inadequate will be returned to the applicant with a brief explanation of what improvements are needed. These applications may be improved and submitted for consideration during a future funding cycle. Applications that do not receive high enough priority during this funding cycle to receive funding will be returned with suggestions to improve the priority ranking in future cycles. All unfunded applications must be resubmitted by the applicant for consideration in a future funding year. Applications requesting collar amounts exceeding $75,000 or proposing projects that involve major structural measures or major land acquisition will be .submitted for consideration by the Governor and the Legislature in the next Capital Improvements Bonding Proposal. i. 2. 3. Description of the Flooding Problem • What is the location, nature , extent, frequency, and severity of flood problems in your local government? Include numbers of lives lost or threatened and the number of hones, businesses and public facilities such as sewers and roads at risk or damaged. Has the area been included in a Presidential Flood Disaster Declaration? If so, when? What lakes, streams, ditches, ponding areas, groundwater aquifers or storm sewers are causing the flooding problems? Description of Flood Damage Assessment Process What kind of assessment process has been used or is proposed to be used to evaluate the flooding problem? Has an inventory of flood -prone structures been conducted for the local unit of government or is an inventory proposed? Has there been any citizen participation utilized in identifying the scope of the flooding problem or in developing this application for assistance? Have the Corps of Engineers, Soil Conservation Service, DNR, a local watershed district or an engineering consultant been utilized to assess the flooding problem? Description of Alternative Flood Mitigation Measures Please list below and summarize the short -term and long -term flood damage mitigation alternatives that have been considered. Why do you feel the most feasible, practical and effective alternative has been proposed for funding in this application? Is this application for the purpose of identifying alternative flood mitigation measures? Pi f 0 11 • 4. Description of the Proposed Flood Damage Reduction Measures What measures are being proposed in this application to alleviate flood damages including inventories, studies and non - structural or structural measures? Will this proposed project affect your entire local government? If the proposed project only affects a portion of the local government, how will flood problems in other areas be addressed? Include work plans, maps, schedules, plans, specifications and costs. Be as specific as possible. 5. Anticipated Results of the Proposed Flood Damage Reduction Measures 6. What are the economic, social and environmental benefits and detriments of the proposed measures? Include both short -term and long -term results and direct and indirect impacts. What other studies, programs or projects have been implemented by the local units of government sponsoring this application to help reduce flood damages including both emergency measures and long -term solutions to flood problems? Check the appropriate items. Flow or State Gaging b Monitoring Acquisition /Relocation —Evacuation Plans Public Education _Floodplain Signing (Markers) _Floodplain Zoning Ordinance Adoption /Administration _Floodproofing Structures _Notification of Flood Insurance Availability _Watershed Analyses Dams —Dikes or Levees Diversion Channels —Land Treatment _Lake Outlet Controls _Stormwater Management Plans _Inventory of Flood Prone Structures Flood Warning Systems _Other (please explain) 7. Project Financing 0 Describe the sources of all funding that will be used to finance the proposed project. If more than one local, state or federal agency is involved in financing, please specify the agencies, amounts and programs to be used. If in -kind services are proposed as match for all or part of this grant request, attach information on the equipment, materials and labor and the unit costs for all items to be provided. What or who is the source of the cost estimates? 8. Schedule What is the proposed implementation schedule for the project described in this application? What are the proposed start -up and completion dates for the project? 0 9. Flood Insurance Does your local government unit (appropriate city or county) participate in the National Flood Insurance Program? If yes, have residents been notified by local officials that flood insurance is available to them? When and how often? 10. Permits Have you applied for and received all local. state or federal permits that are required to implement the proposed project? 11. Land Interests Have the necessary easements, rights -of -way or other land interests needed for the project been acquired? If not, what is the schedule for acquisition? y 0 0 0 12. Zoning Ordinances Is your local government unit (appropriate city or county) administering a state approved shoreland ordinance and floodplain ordinance? If yes, has your local government unit met with representatives of the DNR to evaluate local administration and enforcement of these zoning ordinances? What were the results of this evaluation and have any deficiencies been remedied? Has the ordinance been amended since receipt of the last approval letter from the DNR7 I hereby make application for grant assistance to plan for and implement flood damage reduction measures. All supporting maps, plans, and other information are being submitted with this application. The information submitted and statements made concerning this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature o u or ze gem e STATE OF COUNTY OF Subscribed and sworn to before me this My commission expires Signature of otary ae day of 1 1g , REGION 1(A BEMIDJI Ana) Ad' tonal Hydrologist DNA- Division of waters 2115 Iirchaont Beach Road N.E. 8%•1d.li MN 56401 12181 711 -3977 Detroit Lakes Area Area Hydrologist DRR -Division of waters F.O. 1" 823 Detroit takes, HN 56501 (218) 847 -1579 Fergus Felts Area Area Hydrologist DNR- Divislon of waters 1221 Fir Avenue East Fergus Falls MN 66537 (218) 739 -7$)6 Thief River Falls Area Area Hydrologist DNA -Division of waters 123 Main Ave. N. Thief River Falls, MH 56701 (218) 681 -7789 REGION 2 (AGRAND RAPIDS Regional Hydrologist Area) OWN- Division of waters 1201 East Nfghtny 2 Brand RapPids I1 557" (218) 327.44 6 Duluth Area Ant Hydrologist INR -Dtvfsioa of water% Fre th River Matohery 10029 North Shore Drive Oulu" is I6104 (218) )23.4786 REGION 3 (ABRAINERD Area) Regional Hydrologist 01111- Olvlslon of waters 624 Froat St., Box 668 Irafndrd IN 56401 -26D6 (218) 62j CambrWge Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of waters 916 Soutggeeh MINMIS 66 (4121 iX. 261172 I St.Ckwd Area Area Hydrologist DNR -Division of waters 372S 12th St. North P.O. Box 370 St. Cloud, Hill 56302 (612) 2S6 -4276 REGION 4 (ANEW ULM Area) A focal Hydrologist DHB -Divlslon of Haters I" 7S6. Highway 16 South Hew Oi• NN 56073 (507) 84196 Spicer Area Area Hydrologist DNR - Division Of waters F.O. Box 457 232 lake Ave. South Spicer, MN 56286 (612) 231 -6435 REGION 4 Cont'd Mankato Area Area Hydrologist ONR- O10111a of alters Nichols Office Center Suite 180, 410 Jackson St. Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 389 -2151 Marshall Area Area Hydrologist DMA- Dfvfsia of Waters Box 111, 1400 E. Lyon Marshall n 56258 (507) 63) -7258 REGION S AeAfoul Hydrologist DAR -Division of waters P.O. Box 6247 Rochester, III $5903 (507) 286 -7430 REGION 6 Ro 10111401 Hydrologist 0111-Division of water$ 1200 Warner Road St. Paui, NN SS106 (612) 296 -7527 CENTRAL OFFICE DNA- Division of waters SOO Lafayette Road OUR Building St, Paul, MN SSISS -4032 (612) 2964800 0 DIVISION OF WATERS ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONS AND AREAS 17Rsvef Is -m.. • aE IWI .• 2 • GRAN RAPIDS DelrOit Lakes ■ Duluth 3 Fergus Falls • Regional Office Regional Boundary .. Si. ■ Area Office Cloud■ ■ r'�e — Area Boundary .� SW erg REGION 4 Cont'd Mankato Area Area Hydrologist ONR- O10111a of alters Nichols Office Center Suite 180, 410 Jackson St. Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 389 -2151 Marshall Area Area Hydrologist DMA- Dfvfsia of Waters Box 111, 1400 E. Lyon Marshall n 56258 (507) 63) -7258 REGION S AeAfoul Hydrologist DAR -Division of waters P.O. Box 6247 Rochester, III $5903 (507) 286 -7430 REGION 6 Ro 10111401 Hydrologist 0111-Division of water$ 1200 Warner Road St. Paui, NN SS106 (612) 296 -7527 CENTRAL OFFICE DNA- Division of waters SOO Lafayette Road OUR Building St, Paul, MN SSISS -4032 (612) 2964800 0 (612) 587 -5151 f/U1CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Mayor and City Council FROM: George F. Field, Fire Marshall RE: Renewal of Hotel /Motel Contractural Agreement with State of Minnesota This will be the third renewal of this contract. We provide the service, the State provides the training from time to time. Originally 120 hours of training and later 40 hours of training were pro- vided by the State. This fall another 40 hour program is proposed. 0 The training and our familiarity of the structures are of benefit to the City, and the inspections are of benefit to the State. We are to supply them with our present Ordinance adopting the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code. If you have any questions please contact me. George F. Field Fire Marshal CC: Orlin Henke, Fire Chief 0 DIVISION OF STATE FIRE MARSHAL MARKET HOUSE 289 EAST 5TH STREET W ST . PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 LEPHONE: (812) 298 -7841 May 19, 1989 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Chief Orlin H. Henke Hutchinson Fire Department 205 3rd Avenue S.E. Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Contracting Cities for Hotel /Motel Inspections Dear Chief Henke: The time for renewal of the contract for your city to provide a portion of inspection duties is rapidly approaching. Enclosed is the contract for you to have signed by all of the appropriate persons and returned to us as soon as possible. The terms of the contract requires the State to tri- annually review •the contractor's program to determine its continued compliance with the agreement. Tri- annual review criteria includes code interpretation, enforcement procedures, inspection results and frequency, record completeness and staff training. In the near future the State inspector in your area will be contacting you, at which time he will review your program and make at least two site visits of hotels /motels in your area to determine that code enforcement is consistant throughout the State. Due to budget constraints, the 40 -hour refresher course cannot at this time be offered under the same reimbursement conditions provided in the past. We are, however, looking into putting on some classes sometime after August 1, 1989, if there is sufficient interest out there and if people are willing to pay their own expenses. In other words, we would provide the training, but the students (or their appropriate municipality) would be responsible for their own travel, meal and /or lodging expenses. Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, Thomas R. Brace State Fire Marshal TRB:cw enclosures AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER /y p < �i a1Atc ur murnwunsv t"s l•f CONTRACTUAL (ncn4ute employes) SERVICES Tie. No. I gseeunt I.D. D•pl. /ON. SpumcY He. SuMln ONast Vadsr TyrN _ wm}unt 0 I 535039 07400 Ga I ILpYlzj /))�alfts�� Purnnua TOmr Mut Ne. 0.CD. 1 C.CD. t C.CD. D Con Cpaa a Cm rasa 5 DaY Numax Emwa! EY Typo of TrHNSIbn � A coal ' �waa coos OA" DM NumWr EntnYO ev NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: You are required by Minnesota Statutes, 1981 Supplement, Section 270.66 to provide your social security number or Minnesota tax identification number if you do business with the State of Minnesota. This information may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws. Supplying these numbers could result in action to require you to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities. This contract will not be approved unless these numbers are provided. These numbers will be available to federal and state tax authorities and state Personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. THIS CONTRACT, which shall be interpreted pursuant to the laws of the State of Minnesota, between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Public Safety (hereinafter STATE) and City rtf H,,trhinevon address Soc. Sec. or MN Tax I.D. No. (hereinafter CONTRACTORI, witnesseth that: WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota is empowered to enter into an sort WHEREAS, Federal Employer I.D. No. (if subdivision 2 and all or Dart of the inspection duties set forth in M.S. 299F.46, subdivision 1, L19yd) and WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein, NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: I. CONTRACTOR'S DUTIES (Attach additional page if necessary). CONTRACTOR, who is not a state employee, shall: 1. Triannually inspect every hotel within its jurisdiction and enforce the provisions of the Minnesota Uniform Fire Code as it applies to those facilities at no coat to the State. 2. Furnish to the State Fire Marshal, for processing and service, a copy of the inspection report, orders issued e..nd exit interview. 3. Require all insp2ctora employed for the purposes of this contract to successfully complete the State _re Ilarshal'a 120 hour, and/or refresher course, on the enforcement inspection training program to be provided to the municipality at no cost. 4. Adopt ordinances establishing fire safety standards at least equivalent to the minimtsn standards established by M.S. 299F.o11 and the rules promulgated thereunder, as such statutes and rules are amended from time to time. The consultant may enact ordinances with more stringent requirements. 5. Attach to the contract a certified copy of the municipality's fire ordinance and Council resolution to enter into an agreement. I1. CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. A. Consideration for all services performed and goods or materials supplied by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this contract shall be paid by the STATE as follows: 1. Cmmmation n/a _ 2. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by CONTRACTOR performance of this contract in an amount not to exceed n/a doltars IS n/a ); provided, that CONTRACTOR shall be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses in the same manner and in no greater amount than provided in the current "Commissioner's Plan" promulgated by the Commissioner of Employee Relations. CONTRACTOR shall not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside the State of Minnesota unless it has received prior written approval or such out of state travel from the STATE. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursements to CONTRACTOR shall not exceed B. Terms of Payment 1. Payments shall be made by the STATE promptly after CONTRACTOR'S presentation of invoices for services performed and acceptance of such services by the STATE'S authorized agent pursuant to Clause VI. Invoices shall he submitted in a form prescribed by the STATE and according to the following schedule: (When applicable) Payments are to be made from federal funds obtained by the STATE through Title of the Act of (Public law and amendments thereto). If at any time such funds become unavailable, this contract shall be terminated immediately upon written notice of such fact by the STATE to CONTRACTOR. In the event of such termination. CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. CD 00032. 0315!851 IADMiN. 10511 0 1 J 0 III. IV. V. VI. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT. All services provided by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Contract shall be performed to the set bfaction of the STATE, as determined in the sole discretion of its authorized agent, and in accord with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. CONTRACTOR shall not receive Payment for work found by the STATE to be unsatisfactory, or performed in violation of federal, state or local law, ordinance, rule or regulation. _ TERM CONTRACT. This Contract shall be effective on. Inly I , 19JI2_, or upon such date t is executed as to encumbrance by the Commissioner of Finance occurs later, and shall remain in effect until JvIlt 30 19 -92, or until all obligations set forth in this contract have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. CANCELLATION. This contract may be cancelled by the STATE or CONTRACTOR at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty 1301 days' written notice to the other party. In the event of such a cancellation CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to pdymeol, dew:mmed on a pro rata basis, for work or smviccs satisfactorily performed. STATE'S AUTHORIZED AGENT. The STATE'S authoorzed agent for the purposes of administration of this contract is Allen I. Rupp, Chief Deputy, State Fire Marshal Diyteion Snch agent shall have fine) authority for acceptance of CONTRACTOR'S services and if such services are accepted as satisfactory, shall so certify on each invoice submitted pursuant to Clause II, paragraph B. VII. ASSIGNMENT. CONTRACTOR shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this contract without the prior written consent of the STATE. VIII. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments to this contract shall be in writing, and shall be executed by the same parties who executed the original contract, or their successors in office. IX. LIABILITY. CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify and save and hold the STATE, its agents and employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the performance of this Contract by CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR'S agents or employees. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies CONTRACTOR may have for the STATE'S failure ro fulfill Its obligations pursuant to this Contract. X. STATE AUDITS. The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the CONTRACTOR relevant to this contract shall be subject to examination by the contracting department and the legislative auditor. XI. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. Any reports, studies, photographs, negatives, or other documents prepared by CONTRACTOR in the performance of its obligations under this contract shall be the exclusive property of the STATE and all such materials shall be remitted to the STATE by CONTRACTOR upon completion, termination or cancellation of this contract. CONTRACTOR shall not use, willingly allow or cause to have such materials used for any purpost: other than Performance of CONTRACTOR'S obli gations under this contract without the prior written consent of the STATE. XIL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION. (When applicablel CONTRACTOR certifies that it has received a certificate of Compliance from the Commissioner of Human flights pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 1981 Supplement, Section 363.073. XIII. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. In accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, 1981 Supplement, Section 176.182, the STATE affirms that CONTRACTOR has provided acceptable evidence of compliance with the workers' compensation insurance coverage requirement of Minnesota Statutes, 1981 Supplement, Section 176.181, Subdivision 2. XIV. ANTITRUST. CONTRACTOR hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all claims for overcharges as to goods and /or . services provided in connection with this contract resulting from antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust lam of the United States and the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota. XV. OTHER PROVISIONS. (Attach additional page if necessary): 50a attaened • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Contract to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: NOTE: Remove carillons before obtaining signatures. (D CONTRACTOR: (If a Corporation, two corporate officers must execute.) ev Till. o.se ev Tn. 0.r. ev outno u. xaan.mn Trle As to form and execution by the Q ATTORNEY GENERAL: © COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION: av f•uMerix.a .tpnnunl —_ Dm © COMMISSIONER OF FINANCE: ev IEneumb.me. Center aumoneed sienmol 1011, It", , - Finann prpartmom e , ,. , i gig. _per., _ _ i 1. The State will discontinue inspection and enforcement actions in those facilities covered by the Agreement. The State will provide, without cost to the Contractor, training and consultation on problems. The State will provide, without cost to the Contractor consultation and advice on rules promulgated by the State which are enforced by the Contractor. 2. The State will tri- annually review the Contractor's program to determine its continued compliance with the Agreement. Tri- annual review criteria includes code interpretation, enforcement procedures, inspection results and frequency, records completeness and staff training. 3. The Agreement shall continue to be effective until terminated by either party in accordance with Section V. If the Contractor's program is found by the State to be deficient, but under conditions that do not endanger the fire safety of the community, the State may continue the Agreement on a provisional status for a specific time period. 4. The Agreement may be amended with the mutual consent of both parties. 5. No Agreement shall be effective to transfer any tort liability . attributable to any inspection or lack of inspection from the State to the local unit contracting to perform the inspection. CONTRACT AMENDMENT 0 THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA (City) and MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. (Codifier) in view of the following facts: I. That, on August 13, 1987, Codifier made a Proposal to the City for the codification of the ordinances of the City, which Proposal was accepted on September 22, 1987, which constitutes the written contract between the parties. II. That, but for holding a post -draft conference, then making final corrections in the draft and printing the Master Draft in final form camera -ready for off -set printing, Codifier has fully performed the 0 contract by it to be performed. III. That the City is presently in the process of amending its Comprehensive Plan, which amendments will likely result in changes in land use regulations substantially affecting Chapter 11 of the City Code. IV. That it is advantageous to complete the codification project, continuing present land use regulations as uncoded ordinances and inserting such regulations after they have been amended. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, as follows: 1. That Codifier will proceed to complete performance of the contract by it to be performed, that is, holding the post -draft conference, making the final corrections in the draft communicated to 9 -� it during the post -draft conference, and by printing the master draft, camera -ready for off -set printing, except Chapter 11. 0 2. That the City will complete performance of the contract by it to be performed, including payment in full of the contract price when due as therein stated. 3. That, if requested by the City within one year from the date of execution of this Agreement by Codifier, the City requests that Codifier print out the Master Draft of amended land use regulations, Codifier shall print such land use regulations as Chapter 11, camera -ready for printing. 4. That, except as herein amended, the codification contract executed between the parties in 1987, is hereby ratified and continued in all its provisions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and executed this instrument on the dates hereinafter stated. DATE: CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA Mayor City Administrator DATE: �� MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE CODIFIERS, INC. .- . p, -2- 0 (612) 587 -5151 f/U7lH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, M1NN. 55350 MEMO JUNE 6, 1989 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ----------------------------------------------------------------- FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR - ---------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- SUBJECT: 1989 IMPROVEMENT BONDS ------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- We are putting together the bond issue for the 1989 projects. We currently do not have all the projects bid but do feel we may be in position to put the bond issue together and call for bids this coming Tuesday night. We will be reviewing this with Bill Fahey of Ehlers to insure we have the requirements in order. 9J-, 0 June 8, 1989 City Council City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Filter Rehabilitation and Control System Modification RCM Project No. 14007.01 Gentlemen: '0567 ♦ Or1�> JUN1989 o RECEIVM By Bids were received and opened Friday afternoon, June 4, 1989 for the water treatment facilities filter rehabilitation and control system modification project. This project was bid as two separate projects, Section I consisting of the rehabilitation of the three original filters and Section II consisting of modification of the existing pump control system. The following proposals were received and publicly opened: (����� Section I - Filter Rehabilitation 1. P &L Mechanical, Inc., Bethel, MN $205,178.00 2. Gridor Construction, Inc., Plymouth, MN $207,400.00 rieke 3. Richmar Construction, Inc., Fridley, MN $207,440.00 carroll 4. Shank Mechanical, Inc., Minneapolis, MN $219,700.00 -.,Duller ates inc. 5. Orr Construction, Inc., Bloomington, MN 8 $222,000.00 neers 6. Moorhead Construction Co., Moorhead, MN $226,288.00 arc itects 7. Northwest Mechanical, Inc., Lon Lake, MN 8 $269,000.00 land surveyors Section II - Control System Modification equal opportunity employer 1. Quade's, Inc., Hutchinson, MN $71,500.00 Each proposal was accompanied by a five percent bid bond and attached power of attorney. The bidders are all qualified to perform the work specified and are know to RCM The Section I portion of the project provided for a base bid price using one of three named filterd manufacturers and an option of an addition or deduction alternate for other prior approved equipment manufacturers. All Section I bidders listed General Filter as the base bid filter manufacture and DeZurik as the valve manufacturer. Six of the seven bidders listed Tonka Equipment Company as a deductive alternate on the filter equipment, see attached copies of the bid tabulation. The apparent low bidder, P &L Mechanical, Inc., offered a $18,000.00 deduct with the use of the Tonka Equipment Co. filter equipment. Only one bid, submitted by Quade's Inc., was received on Section II who listed Custom Control Inc. as the quoted control equipment manufacturer. They also offered a $5,000.00 addition for the use of equipment supplied by Consolidated Electric Co. One bid was returned unopened since it was delivered after the designated closing time. 10901 red circle drive box 130 minnetonka, minnesota 55343 612 - 935 -6901 9 -F City of Hutchinson June 8, 1989 Page 2 The bids were less than the engineer's estimate; therefore, the total price is within the budget amounts. Based upon the information provided by the equipment manufacturers prior to the bid, our knowledge of the bidder and his listed suppliers, RCM recommends the award of Section I - Filter Rehabilitation, to the low bidder P &L Mechanical Inc. for the base bid price of $205,178.00. Based upon the information developed during the project development period, our knowledge of the low bidder and our investigation of the listed supplier, RCM recommends the award of Section II - Control Systems Modification to Quade's Inc. for the amount of $76,500.00 incorporating equipment manufactured by Consolidated Electric Co. Followin Council action, we will prepare the necessary Notice of Award; prepare the Owner /Contractor Agreement forms. G1 Charles S. Barger, P.E. RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. CSB /jj Enclosure 11 0 1] City 0.4tchinson, Minnesota RIEKE- CARROLL- MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. BID LAT10!J Filter Rehabi itation and Control System Modification PROJECT: RCM File0007.01 DATE: 2-in PM June 2. 1989 CONTRACTOR Northwest Mech. Quade's Inc.T ADDRESS Long Lake, MN Hutchinson MN ICORP.- PART. -IND. Corp. or . SIGNED BY Paul Ogland Roberta Quade TITLE President BID SECURITY 5% ITEMS SECTION I - Filte Reha ilit i Base Bid Price 269,000.00 Alternate Bid + b Mf Tonka u li Gen Filter DeZurik Com letion Time-Ca ?nday Days, I- Start Work in 2. Subs. Com 1. 212 3. Final Com letio 2 ECTION II - Contr Sys em Mod 'fi id Prinp No Bid 71,500.00 Hnntrnl Custom Contrc It. Mfg 1. Shop Drawi s 45 / 2 90 + 5 000 for Cons idat d City of Hutchinson, Minnesota RIEKE- CARROLL- MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. BID TABULATION Filter Rehabilitation and Control System Modification PROJECT: RCM File 14007.01 DATE:? ..so PM June 2. 1989 CONTRACTOR h Inc. Gridor Const. Richmar Const. • Shank Mech., Inc. Orr Const. Co. 1 Moorhead Const. ADDRESS Bethel MN Plymouth, MN F N Minneapolis, MN Bloomin ton MN ICORP,- PART. -iND. Corp. Corp. Corp. Corp. SIGNED BY Phillip Schneide Harold Theisen Richard ,etz Lyle A. Shank David Orr Arline Shiers TITLE President President BID SECURITY 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% ADDENDUMS 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 1,2,3 ITEMS SECTION I - Filte Reha ilita io Base Bid Price 205 178.00 207 400.00 207 440.00 -219"700,00 222,000.00 226 288.09 Alternate Bid ± -18 0 - -9,240.00 No Bid -10 000.00 -31,981.00 by Mf .. Tonka Tonka Tonka Tonka Tonka Filter S Gen. Filter Gen- Gen. Filter Gen. Filter Gen. Filte- rik i ik �e Erik Completion Tim - a Days I- Start Work in 90 30 2. Subs. Com 1. 240 210 1 SO 242 An I Arl 3. Final Com letio 30 90 30 20 4 ECTION II - Contr S stem Modifica Bid Pr' No Bid No Bid Nn Rid Nn Rid No Ri 1. Shop Drawin s 2. Start a RESOLUTION NO. 9012 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 251 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Texas Avenue from California Street to 405' East of California Street by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Connecticut Street from Shady Ridge Road to the South Line of Hilltop Addition and on Westwood Road from Connecticut Street to the West Terminus by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Carolina Avenue from 180, East of School Road to Arizona Street and Arizona Street from Carolina Avenue to School Road by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing, and Appurtenances; and Keith Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue, Sunset Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue and Chicago Avenue from Sunset Street to Keith Street by Construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $83,634.56, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $15,890.57 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $99,525.13. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $99,525.13. • 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of _ per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 2. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. Mayor . City Administrator 9- RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 9013 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 251 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 89 -05, 89 -06, 89 -07, 89 -12 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 13th day of June, 1989, the City Administrator City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Graham Street from the North Line of the Texas Avenue from California Street to 405' East of California Street by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Connecticut Street from Shady Ridge Road to the South Line of Hilltop Addition and on Westwood Road from Connecticut Street to the West Terminus by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Carolina Avenue from 180' East of School Road to Arizona Street and Arizona Street from Carolina Avenue to School Road by Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; and Keith Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue, Sunset Street from South Grade Road to Chicago Avenue and Chicago Avenue from Sunset Street to Keith Street by Construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: • 1. A hearing shall be held on the 11th day of July, 1989 in the Council . Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid October 1st, 1989. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 25th day of April, 1989 Mayor 9 City Administrator / --� 0 (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 June 7, 1989 M E M 0 R A N D U M TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM DOUG MEIER SUBJECT RECOMMENDATION TO PURCHASE ONE (1) NEW 17 PASSENGER MEDIUM DUTY BUS On April 18, 1989, the City of Hutchinson advertised for proposals to purchase one (1) new 1989 medium duty bus. The bids were opened at 2 p.m. an Tuesday, May 23, 1989, and the results are as follows: Minnesota Body & Equipment Co. 73380 Hwy 101, Shakopee, MN Total bid price (less tax) $36,121.00 Trade -in price of 1981 bus 41000/00 Net bid 32,121.00 Grande American Bus Sales Inc. 13533 Jay St. NW, Anoka, MN Total bid price (less tax) $38,321.00 Trade -in price of 1981 bus 21200/00 Net bid 36,321.00 Hoglund Bus Co., Inc. P.D. Box 249, Monticello, MN Total bid price (less tax) $47,643.00 Trade -in price of 1981 bus 51000_00 Net bid 42,643.00 In addition to the proposals received from the bus companies, the city received two cash bids for the purchase of the used bus. Technical Institute of Hutchinson Cash bid price $3,350.00 Peace Lutheran Church of Hutchinson Cash bid price $3,500.00 • Based on the results of the proposals and contingent on approval from the State of MN Department of Transportation, I recommend that Minnesota Body & Equipment Co. be awarded the contract to supply one (1) new 1969 medium duty bus to the City of Hutchinson, for the price of $36,121.00 plus tax and license. State share of the cost is 80%, city share is 20 %, as budgeted. q -N. Memo Page 2 The State has indicated a need for the unit we are trading in and has stated they will reimburse the City of Hutchinson a dollar amount based on the dollar amount allowed by MN Body 6 Equipment Co. for trade -in. Written confirmation of the State's proposalhas been requested but has not been received at this time. I recommend that any action concerning the trade - in unit be contingent on receipt of confirmation of the State's proposal. Once confirmation has been received, my recommendation would be to allow the State to have our trade -in unit (1961 Chevy bus.) Attachment: bid tabulation DM /hs BID TABULATION CITY OF HU'TCHINSON PROJECT Transit Bus DATE Tuesday. May 23, 1989 - 2.00 P.M. BIDDER SURETY AMOUNT DELIVERY Grande Am. Bus Sales, Inc. 5% Bid Bond $38,321 Anoka, MN 2,000 - Trade In Technical Institute of Hutch. 5% Certif. Hutchinson, MN Check 3,350 - Bid 0 Used Bus MN Body & Equipment Co, Inc. Shakopee, MN 5% Bid Bond $36,121 4,000 - Trade In Peace Lutheran Church Hutchinson, MN 5% Cashier's $ 3,500 - Bid Used Bus Check Hoglund Bus Co., Inc. 5% Bid Bond $47,643 Monticello, MN 5,000 - Trade In is L 0 (612) 587.5151 F CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTONAVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, M . 55350 June 2nd, 1989 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Mr. Charles Barger �u Mr. James Miller Senior Project Manager �\ RCM Associates Donohue Associates Consulting Engineers Diversified 1901 Red Circle Dr. w ` 7200 Hemlock Lane No. P.O. Box 130 Suite 200 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Maple Grove, MN 55369 RE: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Downtown Sprinkler Project Dear Mr. Barger and Mr. Miller: The above - referenced project requires more expertise staff to complete the plans and specifications, than is available to the City. The City Council has directed me to obtain proposals to provide design- construction - inspection service. To assist you in your design, the City will or has: I. Determined no flow study is required. 2. Will obtain RIGHT OF ENTRY approval from all building owners that require sprinkler systems. 3. Will obtain RIGHT OF ENTRY OR EASEMENTS for construction of sprinkler systems in basements. 4. A total of forty -nine (49) buildings are to be sprinkled as shown on the enclosed map. 5. General layouts of the proposed watermains and services are shown on the enclosed maps for your use in calculating your design costs. 6. City staff to provide as much assistance as possible in the office and field relative to the data on water system, sanitary sewer system and storm sewer system in the area. 7. City staff to review plans at least twice during design at time requested by Consultant. For construction of the project, the Consultant is required to provide the following: 1. Complete set of Plans and Specifications for the watermains and service leads, sanitary sewer, sprinkler system for the basements of the 49 buildings, street restoration, sidewalk restoration, tree removal and replacement, tree grate removal and installation and appurtenances, approved by the proper State Regulatory Agencies together with all necessary permits from State Agencies. 9 -J:- Mr. Charles Barger Mr. James Miller City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Downtown Sprinkler Project June 2nd, 1989 Page 2 2. Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost. Said estimate to be itemized. 3. Engineer's estimate of time to complete project, together with a recommended schedule and time frame for each phase or section. 4. Upon completion of the project, it will be necessary to provide the City with one (1) set of As -Built drawings of the project on acceptable reproduceable material. For selection of the Consultant by the City Council, you are requested to furnish the following: 1. Estimated time, from date of a contract, to complete the plans and specifications, cost estimate, and a construction schedule. 2. Cost of design in lump sum. 3. Cost of Construction Inspection and As- Builts. a. Hourly rate of each staff person, including overhead costs, and a number of hours on project with a NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT. Kindly submit the above data to this office on or before 3:00 P.M. on Tuesday, June 13th, 1989. As requested, I will be pesenting the proposals to the Council that night for review. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF HUTCHINSOON/ -`- Marlow V. Priebe City Engineer MVP/PV cc: Gary D. P1otz, City Administrator Cal Rice, Assistant City Engineer George F. Field, Fire Marshal Connie Mangan, Small Cities Grant Adm. Barry Anderson, City Attorney I-Ep rieke Carroll muller 0 ssociates, Inc. ngineers rchhitects land surveyors equal opportunity employer 0 10901 red circled rive box 130 minnetonka, minnesota 55343 612- 935 -6901 9�p1112 g1'k �10 4 309 c ,� ti N L F� u ! BY rU June 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attn: Mr. Marlow Priebe, City Engineer RE: Downtown Sprinkler Project RCM Project No. 10042.00 Gentlemen: We have reviewed your June 2, 1989 request for proposal and have visited with the project personnel regarding the proposed downtown sprinkling project. Based upon the general layout maps supplied us, our knowledge of your Main Street area and the data provided on the basement areas involved, RCM is pleased to submit the following proposal. The project has been divided into two parts, the first or design phase, includes the preparation of a complete set of plans and specifications for the watermains, water service leads, sanitary sewer extension, street restoration, sidewalk restoration, tree removal and replacement, tree grate removal, appurtenances, and installation. This phase includes the preparation of plans and specifications for the installation of a basement sprinkler system in 49 buildings. The design phase will include assistance in obtaining approval of the proper State Regulatory Agencies together with all necessary permits from State Agencies. RCM will work closely with your staff during our preparation of the contract documents to provide those documents in accordance with your funding requirements. Upon completion of the design, we will furnish the City with an itemized estimate of the probable construction cost together with a recommended schedule and time frame for each section of the project construction. The design phase will be completed upon receipt of bids and our recommendation to award the construction contract. The second phase of the project, the construction phase, covers the administration of the construction process, providing on -site resident, construction staking, reviewing contractor pay requests, performing final inspection and the preparation of Record Drawings. The estimated time of the proposed project is as listed below. This schedule is based upon a six week design time following our receipt of a notice to proceed. August 15 - Council Approval for Advertising September 6 - Bid Opening September 19 - Award Bid October 2 - Begin Construction November 3 - End Outside Construction Season May 1 - Resume Outside Construction June 16 - Construction Completed ?--T T City of Hutchinson June 12, 1989 Page 2 Interior construction may continue through the winter with periodic inspection only. Exterior construction season is estimated at ten weeks with on -site observers. RCM proposes to perform the design phase service, up to and including the award of construction contract for a lump sum price of $53,000.00. This fee includes reimbursable expenses for travel to the site and per diem expenses for our mechanical engineer during a three day period in Hutchinson to survey the individual basements. The cost of the construction phase service and preparation of the Record Drawings would be invoiced on a hourly basis with a not -to- exceed amount of $45,000.00 including reimbursables. Fees for the construction service are based on the exterior construction being completed within a ten week period. If this period is longer, RCM will expect to be reimbursed at our standard hourly rate (see attached). The construction phase services are based upon an estimate of 618 hours plus 100 hours for preparation of the Record Drawings. Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this project. Your consideration of our qualifications is very much appreciated, and we look forward to meeting with you, the Mayor, and the City Council to discuss all aspects of our proposal in more detail and to answer any questions. $94.00 Engineering Technician $35.00 Sincer Charles S. Barger, P.El/ RIEKE CARROLL MULLER ASSOCIATES, INC. CSB/ jj CITY OF HUTCHINSON PROPOSED HOURLY RATES • 1989 1990 Per Hour Per Hour Project Manager $70.00 $75.00 Project Engineer $60.00 $64.00 Project Inspector $42.00 $45.00 3 -Man Survey Crew $88.00 $94.00 Engineering Technician $35.00 $37.00 • E • is �/p1112131 S "'E1Vgp N c June 8. 1989 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. West Hutchinson, MN 55350 ENGINEERS Attn: Mr. Marlow V. Priebe ARCHITECTS City Engineer SCIENTISTS Re: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Downtown File Sprinkler System Proposal Dear Mr. Priebe: Donohue & Associates is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional engineering services for your downtown fire sprinkler system project. It is our understanding that the objective of your project is to provide 49 buildings in your downtown area with water sprinkler systems for the build- ings basement areas. In the following text, the term "Owner" refers to the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota while the term "Engineer" refers to Donohue & Associates, Inc. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This project involves adding fire protection systems in an area within the central commercial district of Hutchinson, Minnesota. Specifically it involves adding fire protection to the basement floors of businesses between 2nd Avenue North and 3rd Avenue South along Main Street, to the buildings housing the Hutchinson Theater on Washington Avenue, the Nometz Paint building on lst Avenue South, the R. Cameroth building on 2nd Avenue South, and the American Legion on 3rd Avenue South. The 49 buildings in question presently have water service for potable water needs via existing watermains either in the public streets or alleys within the central commercial dist- rict. The present potable water service has been deemed too small in capacity to provide the fire sprinkler flow for the businesses. It has been determined by the Owner that no hyd- raulic study of the watermain is required and, therefore, we ■ 7200 Hemlock Lane, North Saile20O Maple Grove. Mamesom 55769 012 425.2181 Telefar 612.4251913 s assumed that the present watermains have sufficient flow capacity and static pressure to provide the fire flow needs of the businesses. SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES We have separated our scope of engineering services into two parts. Part 1, the design of the project, consisting of plans ENGINEERS and specifications for construction. Part 2 consists of the inspection services provided during the construction stage of ARCHITECTS the project. SCIENTISTS Part 1 - Design Services Since the Owner has determined that the City's existing water - mains are adequate to provide both fire flow and pressure requirements for the downtown project area, the main focus in design will be on the service distribution network, both externally and internally, for the buildings. Interior design will consist of the following tasks: o Acquisition of building plan layouts from Owner for each structure to be sprinkled. o Field reconnaissance of each structure to verify accur- acy of plan layouts and to interview and determine with is building owner(s) and the fire marshall the fire protec- tion requirements for the basement of each structure. o Preparation of typical details and standards of const- ruction for a fire sprinkling system for each struc- ture's basement, with riser(s) for future sprinkling of upper levels as directed by the Owner. o Preparation of technical specifications for interior fire sprinkling systems. o Review of plans and specifications with the local fire marshall and building official once during preparation and once upon substantial completion of the documents. o Preparation of an estimated construction cost for the work. The exterior design work is presented in two phases - prelim- inary study and final design - since it appears the Owner Mr, Marlow V. Priebe . June 8, 1989 Page 2 • wishes the Engineer to consider two alternative designs. The tasks to be performed under the first phase, preliminary study, are as follows: o Acquire aerial mapping, plat mapping, and as -built underground utilities plans in reproducible mylar form from Owner. • • ENGINEERS o Acquire City standards and other data relative to the design and specification of the work. ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS O Contact regulatory agencies - Minnesota Department of Health (MN /DOH), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN /DOT) - relative to requirements of construction. o Evaluate data and information obtained relative to the two alternatives. o Prepare rough construction cost estimates for each alternative. o Prepare alternative recommendation and review findings with Owner's representative(s). • o Obtain alternative selection from Owner. The second phase, final design, will encompass the following tasks for the chosen alternative: o Site surveys to augment mapping data already collected. O Preparation of plans on a 40 or 50 scale format; plans to include appropriate construction details. o Preparation of specifications in the format of the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee (EJCDC). o Preparation of permit forms for submittal by Owner to regulatory agencies, MnDOH & MnDOT. (Note: Permit fees to be paid by Owner). o Review the construction contract documents with the Owner's representative once during preparation and once again at the time of substantial completion. o Preparation of an estimated construction cost of the work. • Mr. Marlow V. Priebe June 8, 1989 Page 3 i o Provision of up to a total of 25 sets ments for permit submittals and biddin o Assistance to the Owner in bidding This work is limited to 8 hours of ineer's time. Additional time will hourly basis). of contract docu- 3 purposes. the work. (Note: professional eng- be billed on an ENGINEERS o Preparation of a recommendation of award of contract. ARCHITECTS Part 2 - Services During Construction SCIENTISTS It is the intent of Donohue & Associates to provide inspection services for the outside utility work and final cleanup. Any inspection work to be done during the course of installing interior fire services is within the preview of the Fire Marshall and is, therefore, excluded from this proposal. A final inspection of the interior of the buildings for final cleanup, etc. is included in this proposal. During construction, the Engineer will perform the following tasks: o Provide utility inspector. The outside utility work, the final cleanup of the outside area, installation of sidewalk, curb & gutter, and roadway, etc. is antici- pated to be accomplished during the construction phase in 1990. As shown on the schedule, it is anticipated that this construction phase will take place between May 14, 1990 to July 16, 1990. It is our intent to provide one full -time inspector during this period of construc- tion. o Revise the original tracings upon the completion of the project in accordance with information supplied by the Contractor and provide the Owner with one set of repro- ducible revised drawings. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OWNER The scope of services and the estimated compensation are based on the understanding that the Owner will: a. provide a person authorized to act as the Owner's representative to accept completed documents during the course of the design and to provide appropriate liaison. Mr. Marlow V. Priebe • June 8, 1989 Page 4 0 l J b. obtain right -of -entry approval for pre- design and design purposes from the owner(s) of all buildings that require sprinkler systems. C. obtain right -of -entry or easements for construction of sprinkler systems in the basements of these buildings. d. perform negotiations for easement and right -of -way acquisition and right -of -entry and preparation of legal documents for same if necessary. e. provide general layouts of the proposed •w•atermains and ENGINEERS services. ARCHITECTS f. provide as -built documents showing the exact location of SCIENTISTS existing facilities both visible and underground, espec- ially sewer and water service locations. g. review plans and proposed design concepts in a timely manner at least twice during the design phase of the contract. h. decide which design alternative that the final design should encompass. The design alternatives as discussed are to tap off of the existing 12 -inch watermain in Main Street or install new 8 -inch watermains under the side- walks on both sides of Main Street from which new serv- ices to the buildings will be tapped. (Note: It is imperative that this decision be made immediately in commencing the design in order to accomplish the work per the indicated schedule.) i. provide mapping and other data as specified hereinafter which Donohue will use to develop the plans for the project. j. provide payment for the services of a geotechnical engineering consultant for soil borings or other subsur- face explorations necessary to secure information for design purposes. The contract for the investigation shall be between the Owner and the geotechnical consul- tant and the cost shall be paid by the Owner. k. make decisions in a timely manner for design options for the project. 1. pay all permit and use fees. ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE June 13, 1989 Council recommends award of proposal. June 27, 1989 Council approves engineers agreement for project. June 28, 1989 • Mr. Marlow V. Priebe June 8, 1989 Page 5 Donohue & Associates starts project design. s July 26, 1989 Preliminary plans submitted to City of Hutchinson for review. August 4, 1989 City of Hutchinson returns plans to Donohue & Associates with review comments. ENGINEERS August 18,1989 Final set of plans and specifica- tions complete. ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS August 22, 1989 Council authorizes bidding of proj- ect. September 21, 1989 Bid opening. September 26, 1989 Council approves award of construc- tion contract. October 1989 thru Contractor completes all inside April 1990 sprinkler plumbing work. May 14, 1990 Contractor starts outside utility work. July 16, 1990 Contractor completes outside utility • work and final cleanup. COMPENSATION Compensation for these services will be a lump sum for Part 1 and on an hourly basis for Part 2 in accordance with the engineer's hourly fees and rates in effect at the time the services are performed. The engineer will bill the Owner monthly for the services provided plus other expenses incidental to the project such as printing, meals, mileage and other direct expenses. Payment will be due 30 days after the billing date. Donohue's general conditions are in effect and are attached for your review. The fees for these services are: Part 1: Lump Sum $39,800 Part 2: Estimated Per Diem $18,000 Mr. Marlow V. Priebe • June 8, 1989 Page 6 0 • ADDITIONAL SERVICES The Engineer can provide other additional services not reques- ted in the Request for proposal. These services include: o Construction staking. ENGINEERS The construction survey work would consist of profiling the existing curb and gutter and restaking the curb and ARCHITECTS gutter at the same grades as presently exist. No change Sc ICFT I STS in alignment either horizontal or vertical is antici- pated or included for main street or for any of the side streets. Anticipated cost for this work is $3,000. (This includes five days of a two man survey crew.) o Construction engineering /construction management. Conduct a preconstruction conference with represen- tatives of the Contractor, Engineer, Owner, and affected utilities. Furnish a Construction Engineer who would visit the sites at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work and to determine, in general, if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. During such visits and on the basis of on -site observations, the Engineer would keep the Owner informed of the prog- ress of the work, would endeavor to guard the Owner against defects and deficiencies in the work of the Contractor, and would reject work found not in conformance with the contract documents. Review shop drawings as required of the Contractor by the contract documents. - Prepare contract change orders for Owner execution, field modifications for adjustments not requiring extra time or money, and perform other construc- tion- related administration during the project. - Process monthly applications for payment submitted by the Contractor and forward to the Owner for execution with recommendations for approval and payment. Mr. Marlow V. Priebe June 8, 1989 Page 7 Perform a field observation of the cosp?ezed cont- ract before recommending final payment a= szt forth in the application from the Contractor. Where applicable, witness field tesz-_'n.z of the facilities furnished under each contr_c_ __ assist in determining conformance with zn zontract documents. ENGINEERS Anticipated costs for these services is $9.�__:. ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS Statements in this proposal which relate to _znze_ :sation, completion dates, time schedules, interest rates_ =_.c similar matters are based upon conditions prevailing a. ^i tme of proposal preparation. If more than three months ar< taraitted to elapse between the presentation of this do,:%=en= to the Owner and the time at which the Engineer is given a_tharity to proceed, this proposal will be subject to review. ?ecognition of the need for such a review will not in itself be a basis for voiding this proposal. If services different from those identified in cr-` -s proposal are required for the Engineer as a result of subsee_en_ inves- tigations, changes in regulatory agency requiremer.:s a_ inter- pretations, or upon a direction of the Owner, the Enzi •eer and • the Owner agree to renegotiate the standard agreement. The additional services and compensation shall be nezz:isned and the Engineer shall not proceed with additional se=icas until approved by the Owner and the appropriate regulator a>ercy if required. Preparation for and attendance at meetings initiatee by the Owner which have not been included in the scope of engineering services shall be paid for in addition to the compensation stated herein. Compensation will be computed on a= hourly basis plus expenses. Approval of this proposal shall be considered as authorization to develop an agreement for the services described. The Engineer can begin this project immediately after execution of the agreement and can complete the services described in Part 1 within eight weeks after receiving authorization to proceed. Mr. Marlow V. Priebe June 8, 1989 Page 8 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS • We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for engineering services. If you have any questions, please contact Jim Miller at (612) 425 -2181. Michael P. Hoff Vice President Division Manager M /P /BG6 Mr. Marlow V. Priebe June 8, 1989 Page 9 James R. Miller Associate (612) 587 -5151 F CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 6, 1989 T0: Mayor & City Council — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — FROM: Marlow V. Priebe Consultant Engineer— SUBJECT: Downtown Sprinkler System — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — At the staff meeting of June 2 on the proposed project for the above - referenced system, we concluded that installing a service line beyond the curb line on Franklin Street to serve Benjamin's paint store before the final surface is placed by the contractor would be cost effective. Permission to have same installed by Juul Contracting is requested at this time. /ms s qs JUUL CONTRACrlNO CO. G -lL -49 USING CHART r., 4 .D/ Scr ✓icy -E° i7L T Icre.n IAla4e -0 1 a 101 4 We4,,t SK fe ride /k on rru4iklii 5"e- 4- cl F•/ D!n �PcF 604c Valve g $OX / F• / 8 ''x �" ?c c / ecv Gas rC'emoJe Gue 6 +� steY OLF lnS da4 kJrn bq Z4crrm eA.)er- R IaCG SOON // .PGmO %l a SOS ►�ylM iii s '� �J �IGrH° ✓6 ! IC kLGG CI IG�� Geo�tX -�,la $38x5 00 (612) 587 -5151 f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor 6 City Council ------------------------ - - - - -- FROM: - Marl-ow- Y. -Ysiaba,_CnsLSUltant SUBJECT: 1A11ey_SLorm PWer _I.izte. liegt —of Main_SS,rge_t Be _tweeze — — — — Second and Third Avenue At the staff meeting held this date on the above - referenced matter, we concluded that installation of a new line at this time would be cost ef- fective. The present system is old, shallow and has had make -shift type of additions over the years. It is a problem in the spring due to freeze up. Attached is a letter from the Utilities relative to work proposed by them. Also, for your information, is an estimate for installing the storm sewer. Since most of the bituminous surface will be removed for construction in the alley between Second and Fourth Avenue, it is recommended we surface same with concrete and the City pay for that amount exceeding the cost of bituminous replacement. We request permission to proceed with obtaining bids for a total price. /ms 0 k, Hutchinson Utilities Commission Hutchinson, Minnesota 225 m¢rnyan streel '�35J E. "Bud" Daggett President Theodore Beatty Vice President Thomas B.Lyke Secretary W.T. Richards Commissioner Jerry Cornell Commissioner Clarence Kadrmas, P.E. General Manager Tel. 612/587 -4746 FAX 612•'587 -4721 May 31, 1989 Marlow Priebe City Engineer City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Priebe: This past winter the Hutchinson Utilities Commission, Telephone Company and Cable T.V., met with city staff relative to our joint plans to bury our facilities in the alley between Main Street and Franklin Street, south of Second Avenue SW. We proposed that possibly this would be a good time to work on the storm sewer problems that exist in the alley. We are attempting to make final plans; but as yet, have not received anything final as to the storm sewer. Would you research this and let me know how much work, if any, is to be done on the storm sewer so we all could coordinate our construction schedules. Thank you. iS Sincerely, HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION M. D. "Butch" Wentworth Electric Superintendent 0 s 0 • R P 960 c.r 03�!'' 981!000 i � Cen� /�// 2 e� o J20 =� /`i�/o •00 i 001734- Gf$ 27 ',I �� rtetr, 0380°0 760.00 i Cr 6o Cy m s° 330. oQ r E i 8 /act -{a � _ (�'� n,. ✓et 1. (612) 587.5151 FCITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 MEMORANDUM TO: _Mayor_ &_C3ty-Coensit - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FROM: Gsiry P._ -lotzy -City— Administrator — ---- — — — — — — — — — — SUBJECT: __Avct3iteet_TQ Review City Hall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — It is my opinion that either Short - Elliott- Hendrickson or Boarman 6 Asso- ciates should be chosen. Based on the cost of the above proposals, it would appear that Short - Elliott- Hendrickson is the best "value." In addition, their "team" (including Orfield & Associates) has shown the most interest and spent the most hours in reviewing our facility and talking with various employees. The firm also appears somewhat knowledgeable on grants. For these reasons I recommend them. Boarman 6 Associates is generally considered the "cadillac architectural firm" for such municipal studies. They are the most experienced, and a very large firm, with computer -aided equipment to design an interior lay- out alternatives. They would probably do a more detailed report from the work - product I have seen. However, cost and individual employee attention may be better with SEH. /ms 9 r (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55p5po JUNE 6, 1989 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL ----------------------------------------------------------------- FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR ----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- SUBJECT: CITY HALL FINANCING ----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- The Mayor asked to review what our current dollars are and what financing option might be available. If an assumption, having not undertaken the study, if the dollars needed were $500,000 Potential funding could be as follows in part or all: 1989 funds on hand $111,000 (includes roof$) 1990 funds 200,000 (using all additional funds from Utility contribution) General Fund Balance 100,000 Fund transfer Balance 89,000 0 Sources for balance would be: State low interest loan from the energy investment loan fund. Lease Purchase financing. 0 _5EH ENGINEERS l /IRCNITECTS I PLANNERS May 24, 1989 Mr. Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue Hutchinson, Minnesota Dear Mr. Plotz: FOR YOUR INFORMATION 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55N7 17 612 484 -0272 RE: COST HARE 1 L� West 55350 �T �e P 1 I � MAXI -AUDIT GRANT `2�'J24� 262j�� MAY 19 &9 0 IMCUM 8Y_ _____- w/ Thank you and the City Council and staff for the opportunity yesterday to discuss your most important project. I would like to clarify questions you may have concerning the Cost -Share Maxi -Audit Grant program and how it relates to our fee proposal. As stated in the project request for proposal, the City requires an evaluation of the building envelope and mechanical systems for the existing City Hall. This portion of the study would qualify for 80 percent State reimbursement through the Cost -Share Maxi - Audit Grant program, with a maximum of $2,400. The maximum amount would be applied to our proposed fee of $8,500. The result is an actual cost to the City of $6,100 for the feasibility study. The request for proposal did not mention an evaluation of the old fire station building envelope or mechanical system, therefore that was not included in our proposed fee. If the City desires a Maxi -Audit on the old fire station, the cost would be about $520 over and above the fee originally proposed. I would like to point out that if the City would like to take advantage of this Cost -Share Maxi -Audit Grant program, two separate agreements would be required; one for the feasibility study in the amount of $5,500 and a second for the Maxi -Audit in the amount of $3,000 for the City Hall or $5,600 for both City Hall and the old fire station. SHORT EL UOT HENDRICKSON INC. ST PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN City of Hutchinson May 24, 19889 Page 2 The agreement for the feasibility study could be entered after the selection was made and the agreement for the Maxi -Audit entered after the grant application is approved (about 30 days). We anticipate this would work within the project schedule. If you have any questions regarding these items, please give me a call at 484 -0272. Sincerely, Short- liott- Hendric on, Inc. a win M. Lind 1, AIA DML /dma Architecture apartment Manager 11 17J (612) 587 -5151 f1U7lH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 2. 1989 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ------------------------ - - - - -- FROM: RANDY DEVRIES -- DIRECTOR OF WATER AND WASTEWATER OPERATIONS ----------------------- - - - - -- SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT—FEE—FOR—RCM—PROJECT-14007.01 — -------———-------- - — — — — — I recommend that the City Council waive the Building Permit fee for RCM project 14007.01. This is the filter rehabilitation and control project. RD /pl 0 9 -/ RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS RESOLUTION NO. 9011 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 89 -15 S.A.P. 133 - 104 -03 S.A.P. 133 - 112 -02 S.A.P. 133 - 121 -01 C.S.A.P. 43- 607 -07 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Council on May 10th, 1989, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Bluff Street from T.H. 7 to 2,600' North by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Retaining Wall, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Drainage Area Adjacent to Bluff Street from the South Fork of the Crow River to 2,600' North of T.H. 7 by the Construction of Storm Sewer Lines, Manholes, Catch Basins, Lead Lines, and Appurtenances; Carlisle Street Area by the Construction of Storm Sewer Lines, Catch Basins, Lead Lines, and Appurtenances; and Waller Drive from Bluff Street to 800, South and East by the Construction of Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 0 1. Such specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks; shall specify the work to be done; shall. state t t bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on July 11th, 1989, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota by the City Administrator and Engineer; will then be tabulated; and will be considered by the Council at the regularly scheduled Council Meeting following the assessment hearing, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 per cent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. Mayor 0 City Administrator 9 -N (612) 587 -5151 ya�cy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON . 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 J M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 8, 1989 TO: Mayor & City Council ------------------------ - - - - -- FROM: — Doug Meier, Maintenance Operations Supervisor — — — — — — SUBJECT: Recommendation to Purchase ------------------------ - -- - -- On May 1, 1989 the City of Hutchinson advertised for bids to purchase two combination grass and sidewalk maintenance machines, one snow blower, one rotary, all hydraulic broom. The bids were publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on June 6, 1989 and the results are as follows: NTI DISTRIBUTING CO. Plymouth, MN (2) New 1989 Combination Grass & Sidewalk Maintenance Machines (1) New Snow Blower, 50 Inch, 2 -Stage Design (1) New Broom, All Hydraulic Rotary Type (60 ") Trade -In Bid for Two 1981 Machines with One Snow Blower & One Broom Net Price After Trade LONG LAKE FORD TRACTOR LONG LAKE, NN Total Bid Price for Two New 1989 Grass & Sidewalk Maintenance Machines (1) Snow Blower (1) New Broom Trade -In of Two 1981 Units with Snow Blower /Broom Net Bid $23,724.00 2,071.00 3,150.00 5,200.00 $23,745.00 $25,190.00 1,744.00 2,374.00 No Bid $29,308.00 9 There was one cash bid submitted for some of the used equipment. • Cash Bid On One 1981 Sidewalk & Grass Maintenance Machine $513.00 Cash Bid Price for Snow Blower Total Cash Bid 205.00 $718.00 My recommendation to the Mayor & City Council is that MTI Distributing Co. from Plymouth, MN be awarded the contract to supply two combination grass and sidewalk maintenance machines, one snow blower and one rotary all hydraulic broom to the City of Hutchinson for a net price of $23,745.00 after trade -in of the 1981 machines and attachments. The machines and attachments were in- cluded in the 1989 budget and were scheduled for replacement this year. /ms u RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 89 -04 Resolution No. 9014 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the North Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 to Dale Street and South Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 West to Hutchinson Mall Entrance at Merrill Street by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances. WHEREAS, it is not proposed to assess the benefitted property for the cost of the improvement. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to Marlow V. Priebe for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. City Administrator 0 Mayor 9- ENGINEER'S - REPORT CITY OF HUTCHINSON DATE: June 6th, 1989 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Engineering SUBJECT: Letting No. 6, Project No. 89 -04 I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be waived, as this project would not be assessable. LETTING NO. 6 - PROJECT NO. 89 -04: North Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 to Dale Street and South Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 West to Hutchinson Mall Entrance at Merrill Street by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtennees. Construction Cost $ 60,400.00 Engineering $ 3,600'.00 Fiscal and Miscellaneous $ 4,000.00 Land Acquisition $ 0.00 Capitalized Interest $ 12,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ------------------------------ $ 68,000.00 Assessable Cost $ 0.00 Deferred Assessable Cost $ 0.00 City Cost $ 68.000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL ------------------------------ $ 68,000.00 Marlow V. Priebe Consulting Engineer MVP /pv Is 9 -P RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 89 -00 Resolution No. 9015 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted June 13th, 1989, a report has been prepared by Marlow V. Priebe with reference to the improvement of the North Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 to Dale Street and South Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 West to Hutchinson Mall Entrance at Merrill Street by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances, and said report was received by the Council on June 13th, 1989. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council has considered the improvement of such area in accordance with said report. 2. The Public Hearing shall be waived, as said project is unassessable. Adopted by the Council this 3th day of June, 1989. 0 City Administrator Mayor 97 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9016 LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 89 -04 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 13th day of June, 1989, waived hearing on the improvement of the North Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 to Dale Street and South Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 West to Hutchinson Mall Entrance at Merrill Street by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolutions adopted the 13th day of June, 1989. 2. The Director of Engineering is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. Mayor City Administrator I] 1] 9F RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS RESOLUTION NO. 9017 LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 89 -04 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Council on June 13th, 1989, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of the North Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 to Dale Street and the South Side of South Grade Road from T.H. 15 West to Hutchinson Mall Entrance at Merrill Street by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenancess; and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks; shall specify the work to be done; shall state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on July 11th, 1989, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota by the City Administrator and Engineer; will then be tabulated; and will be considered by the Council at the regularly scheduled Council Meeting on June 27th, 1989 at 8:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 per cent of the amount of such bid. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. City Administrator i Mayor 9 -jp TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee DATE: June 7, 1989 RE: Recycling The Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee recommends the following: That the services proprosed by the McLeod County Solid Waste Management Committee be rejected at this time. That the City Council consider contracting out the following services independently of the county proposal. That curbside pickup in Hutchinson be on a trial basis within a designated precinct for a period of six months. That dropbox locations be provided for other residents who will not be immediately served by the curbside services. That the City Council develop specifications for operating procedure of the pilot program mentioned above. That the established Hutchinson Solid Waste Management Committee be included in the development of this recycling pilot program. We are asking that the council accept or reject our proposal as stated, or consider other alternatives for implementing a comparable recycling program. 0 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND • ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 243 -A LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 88 -11 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Chicago Avenue from Keith Street to Sunset Street by Construction of Grading, Aggregate Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing, Concrete Driveway Approaches, Sewer and Water Services to the Property Line of All Buildings or Buildable Sites, and Appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $13,252.83, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $2,915.62 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $16,168.45. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $16,168.45. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1990, and shall bear interest at the rate of per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment • resolution. 2. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 3. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 13th day of June, 1989. City Administrator 0 Mayor I RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 243 -A • LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 88 -11 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 13th day of June, 1989, the City Administrator City Clerk was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving Chicago Avenue from Keith Street to Sunset Street by Construction of Grading, Aggregate Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing, Concrete Driveway Approaches, Sewer and Water Services to the Property Line of All Buildings or Buildable Sites, and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 11th day of July, 1989 in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official • newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid October 1st, 1989. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 13th day.of June, 1989 City Administrator • Mayor ASSESSMENT ROL 0. 243 -A NG NO. 6, PROJECT 88 -11 COST PER UNIT: $ 1, 84 $ 1,6.16.85 COMPILED BY: Ie Anderson GRADING, AGG. BASE, CURB 8 GUTTER, BIT. SURlG, CONC. DRIVEWAY, SEWER & WATER SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: Eugene Anderson SERVICES & APPURTENANCES ON CHICAGO AVENUE FROM KEITH STREET TO SUNSET STREET NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice UNIT USED: PER LOf ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK SERVICE IO IAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. UNIT LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 12- 116 -30 -02 -0130 First State Bank Brownton 389.0060 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 6 1 1 E 1,616.84 02 12- 116 -30 -02 -0140 First State Bank Brownton 389.0070 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 7 1 1 S 1 ,6lb. ^•1 03 12- 116 -30 -02 -0150 William & Jackie Backen 825 Chicago Ave. 389.0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Plaza Heights Add. 8 1 1 { 1,616.84 04 12-116 -30 -02 -0160 Edna Londorich 835 Chicago Ave. 389.0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Plaza Heights Add. 9 1 1 E 1,616.84 05 12- 116 -30 -02 -0170 First State Bank Brownton 389.0100 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 10 1 1 $ 1,616.84 06 12- 116 -30 -02 -0260 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0190 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 1 4 1 $ 1,616.85 07 12- 116 - 30-02 -0270 Norwest Bank Stillwater Nat]. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0200 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 2 4 1 $ 1,616.81; 08 12- 116 -30 -02 -0280 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.M. Ave, 389.0210 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 3 4 1 $ 1,615.85 09 12- 116 -30 -02 -0290 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.M. Ave. 389.0220 Stillwater. MN , 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 4 4 1 E 1 516.85 10 12- 116 -30 -02 -0300 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0230 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 5 4 1 f 1,616.85 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 243 -A $ l6 168 4'i ASSESSMENT ROO. 243-A NG NO. 6, PROJEC 88 -11 6 COST PER UNIT: $ 10.84 1 1,616.8', COMPILED BY: ne Anderson GRADING, AGG. BASE, CURB 8 GUTTER, BIT. SU ING, CONC. DRIVEWAY, SEWER A WATER SERVICE LEAD: 1 1 COMPUTED BY: Eugene Anderson SERVICES A APPURTENANCES ON CHICAGO AVENUE FROM KEITH STREET TO SUNSET STREET NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice 1,616.84 UNIT USED: PER to[ ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK SERVICE 101AL NO, COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. UNIT LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMI -Nl 01 12- 116 -30 -02 -0130 First State Bank Brownton 389.0060 Brownton, MN 55312 02 12- 116 -30 -02 -0140 First State Bank Brownton 389.0070 Brownton, MN 55312 03 12- 116 -30 -02 -0150 William A Jackie Backen 825 Chicago Ave. 389.0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 04 12- 116 -30 -02 -0160 Edna Londorich 835 Chicago Ave. 389.0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 05 12- 116 -30 -02 -0170 First State Bank Brownton 389.0100 Brownton, MN 55312 06 12- 116 -30 -02 -0260 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0190 Stillwater, MN 55082 07 12- 116 -30 -02 -0270 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0200 Stillwater, MN 55082 08 12- 116 -30 -02 -0280 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0210 Stillwater, MN 55082 09 12- 116 -30 -02 -0290 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0220 Stillwater, MN 55082 10 12- 116 -30 -02 -0300 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0230 Stillwater, MN 55082 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 243-A Plaza Heights Add. 6 1 1 i 1,616.84 Plaza Heights Add. 7 1 1 $ 1,616.84 Plaza Heights Add. 8 1 1 $ 1,616.84 Plaza Heights Add. 9 1 1 1 1,616.84 Plaza Heights Add. 10 1 1 $ 1,616.84 Plaza Heights Add. 1 4 1 $ 1,616.85 Plaza Heights Add. 2 4 1 S 1,616.85 Plaza Heights Add. 3 4 1 $ 1,616.85 Plaza Heights Add. 4 4 1 $ 1,616.95 Plaza Heights Add. 5 4 1 $ 1,616.9, $ 16,1611.45 ASSESSMENT ROL 243-A NG NO. 6, PROJECT 88-1: COST PER UNIT: $ 1, 4 i 1,6 rG, R9 COMPILED BY: E Anderson GRADING, AGG. BASE, CURB & GUTTER, BIT. SURF G. CONC. DRIVEWAY, SEWER & WATER SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: Eugene Anderson SERVICES & APPURTENANCES ON CHICAGO AVENUE FROM KEITH STREET TO SUNSET STREET NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice UNIT USED: PIR LOf ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK SERVICE FO fAI. NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. UNIT LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 12-116 -30 -02 -0130 First State Bank Brownton 389.0060 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 6 1 1 $ 1,616.84 - 02 12- 116 - 30-02 -0140 First State Bank Brownton 389.0070 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 7 1 1 1 1,616.84 03 12- 116 -30 -02 -0150 William & Jackie Backen 825 Chicago Ave. 389.0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Plaza Heights Add. 8 1 1 $ 1,616.84 04 12- 116 -30 -02 -0160 Edna Londorich 835 Chicago Ave. 389.0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Plaza Heights Add. 9 1 1 $ 1,616.84 05 12- 116 -30- 02-0170 First State Bank Brownton 389.0100 Brownton, MN 55312 Plaza Heights Add. 10 1 1 S 1,616.84 06 12- 116-30 -02 -0260 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natt. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0190 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 1 4 1 $ 1,616.85 07 12- 116 - 30-02 -0270 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0200 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 2 4 1 1 1,616.85 08 12- 116 -30 -02 -0280 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0210 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 3 4 1 $ 1,616.85 09 12- 116 -30 -02 -0290 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0220 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 4 4 1 $ 1,616.85 10 12- 116 -30 -02 -0300 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0230 Stillwater, MN 55082 Plaza Heights Add. 5 4 1 $ 1,616.85 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 243 -A $ 16,168.45 ASCESSMENT R�NO. 243 -A NG NO. 6, PROJE 88 -11 f COST PER UNIT: $ 6 .84 $ 1.616.85 COMPILED BY: ene Anderson GRADING, AGG. BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, BIT. S ING, CONC. DRIVEWAY, SEWER 8 WATER SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: Eugene Anderson SERVICES d APPURTENANCES ON CHICAGO AVENUE FROM KEITH STREET TO SUNSET STREET NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice UNIT USED: PER 101 ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK SERVICE TorAL -:NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME d ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. UNIT LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMfHI 01 12- 116 -30 -02 -0130 First State Bank Brownton 389.0060 Brownton, MN 55312 02 12- 116 -30 -02 -0140 First State Bank Brownton 389.0070 Brownton, MN 55312 03 12- 116 -30 -02 -0150 William d Jackie Backen 825 Chicago Ave. 389.0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 04 12- 116 -30 -02 -0160 Edna Londorich 835 Chicago Ave. 389.0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 05 12-116 -30 -02 -0170 First State Bank Brownton 389.0100 Brownton, MN 55312 06 12-116 -30 -02 -0260 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.N. Ave. 389.0190 Stillwater, MN 55082 07 12- 116-30 -02 -0270 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0200 Stillwater, MN 55082 08 12- 116 -30 -02 -0280 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.N. Ave. 389.0210 Stillwater, MN 55082 09 12- 116 -30 -02 -0290 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.W. Ave. 389.0220 Stillwater, MN 55082 10 12- 116 -30 -02 -0300 Norwest Bank Stillwater Natl. 2000 N.N. Ave. 389.0230 Stillwater, MN 55082 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 243-A Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add. Plaza Heights Add. Plaza Heights Add Plaza Heights Add 6 1 1 7 1 1 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 1 1 1 4 1 2 4 1 $ 1,616.84 S 1,616.84 $ 1,616.84 $ 1,616.64 $ 1,616.84 $ 1,616.85 $ 1,616.85 3 4 1 f 1,616.85 4 4 1 f 1,616.85 5 4 1 f 1,616.85 S li,lyd�.45 54,177.63 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING June 13,1989 parts $ SEWER FUND Crysteel Disb. Co. parts •WATER Jason Baumetz %safety shoes $30.00 Midway Ind. Supply Co. Flexible Pipe Tools Co. supplies 70.98 parts Sargent Welch Scientific supplies 3.50 139.99 Semware supplies 62.95 Brandon Tire Technical Inst. of Hutch work study student 171.40 parts Thermolyne Corp. cleaner 7.00 .70 Am. Payment Center 3 months box rental 56.00 Automation Supply Co. office supplies 93.07 Brandon Tire repairs 5.50 Crow Chemical chemicals 20.90 Chapin Pub. Co. adv. for bids 221.40 Carquest Auto Parts parts .64 Coast to Coast supplies 169.91 COmmissioner of Revenue May sales tax 390.74 County Market distilled water 7.56 Curtin Scientific supplies 91.81 Dixie Petro Chemical chemicals 1463.40 Farm $ Home supplies 1.69 Farmers Elevator Assn. fertilizer 154.45 Floor Care Supply cleaning supplies 45.45 Fitzlo£f Hardware supplies 45.46 G $ K Services uniform rental 210.90 Hutch Coop gasoline 687.55 Hutch Medical Center physical exam 30.00 •Hutch Utilities Junker Sanitation gas F, electric May refuse pickups 14,963.40 37,299.80 L $ P Supply Co. trimmer & supplies 251.70 Mn. Valley Test Lab. testing 104.65 Nalco Chemical Co. supplies 7242.18 Sorenson Farm Supply part .75 PERA employer contribution 343.83 Tri Co. Water Cond. salt 8.20 City of Hutch Dental Self Fund June dental ins. 272.58 Mutual Benefit June LTD ins. 108.15 City of Hutch Self Ins. fund June medi. ins. 2219.73 *Withhold Tax Acct. employer contribution 609.77 *U.S. Postal Service June water bills 177.63 54,177.63 CENTRAL GARAGE FUND C $ I Repair parts $ 4.95 Crysteel Disb. Co. parts 170.57 Jerrys Transmission Service repairs 793.21 Midway Ind. Supply Co. parts 49.68 McDonald Sales F, Service parts 31.25 Is Northern parts 139.99 Sowestern Battery parts 103.90 Brandon Tire repairs 206.64 Carquest Auto Parts parts 903.98 Coast to Coast supplies .70 //- 6?r -2- •Farm $ Home HutchCoop Hutch Iron $ Metal Hutch Wholesale Jerabek Machine Shop MTI Dist. Co. MacQueen Equipment Plowmans Schmeling Oil Co. PERA Town & County Tire Mutual Benefit City of Hutchinson Dental Self Fund City of Hutchinson Self Ins. Fund *Withhold Tax Account GENERAL FUND Robert Ringstrom Scott Webb Paul Ackland •Pam Lindahl Janet Brown Ed Homan Connie Mangan Steve Arneson Kathy Stouvenal Gail Lehn Mary Haugen Kurt Leske Patricia Buytaert Bev Mueller Linda Haas Margaret Mueller Jean Nisse Robert Sutter Earl Haarstad Deb Holtz Pamala Houk Lisa Johnson Jo. Piehl Linda Twedt Scott Anderson Paula Straub Doris Fennell Judy Sones Karen Mathews Susan Richards Lyla Otto Linda Madsen Gary Plotz Jeanette Pavlish Daniel Sjurseth supplies $ 6.66 gasoline and tires 783.18 supplies 13.66 supplies 291.46 supplies 5.88 supplies 178.41 parts 230.51 repairs 152.60 oil 844.00 employer contribution 50.91 repairs 50.43 june LTD ins. 11.60 June dental ins. 31.28 June medical ins. 235.61 employer contribution 89.96 $ 5,381.02 gas masks $ 10.60 4 hrs court 50.64 League Conv. F, mtg expenses 183.53 'z Lotus course fee 45.56 CDS school 20.85 state fire school 45.00 conference expenses 41.58 %safety boots 30.00 workshop expenses $ postage 29.70 supplies 28.05 1990 conferen ce exp. 16.91 softball umpire 13.00 repaired 44 football pants 88.00 soccer coach 574.00 soccer coach 488.25 soccer coach 586.25 overcharge - refund 4.00 gymnastics refund 15.00 overcharge refund 2.00 overcharge refund 2.00 overcharge refund 2.00 overcharge refund 2.00 overcharge refund 2.00 overcharge refund 2.00 work at Park Concession stand 6.00 refund 3.00 cancelled program refund 10.00 swimming refund 6.00 Cancelled program refund 13.00 swimming refund 10.00 swimming refund 10.00 swimming refund 6.00 softball refund 13.00 swimming refund 12.00 Peanuts refund 12.00 -3- Sue Tapio swimming refund $ 8.00 Pat Minnick volleyball refund 45.00 J. Selander softball refund 5.00 .Judy Thunstrom swimming refund 10.00 Suzie Decker swimming refund 10.00 Mark K. Jensen golf instructor fee 90.00 Harold Krueger Sr. Prom entertaimmnet 60.00 Charlotte Ring Theatre refund 29.00 Eva Tows Theatre refund 29.00 W.W. White Theatre refund 58.00 American Planning Assn. dues 110.00 Badge A Minit supplies 74.46 Business Education Services seminar reservation 198.00 Camera Art equipment 918.05 Cedar Computer Center equipment 7956.00 City of Hutchinson Lodging Tax lodging tax 12.72 Daves Tri Minnicks carpet & window cleaning 252.00 Dittmer Oil Co. gasoline 23.25 Engineering Contacts employment ad 45.00 Fitzharris Athletic sports ball locker 133.22 FRank Sheehan police dept. stressworkshop 750.00 G.A. Ernst 6 Associates 48 audits 3812.00 Gopher STate One Call Inc. calls 361.25 Hansen Truck Service repairs 238.88 Holiday Inn St. CLoud room for conference 91.02 HutchConvention $ Visitors Bureau April collections 1261.55 Ice Skating Inst. of America supplies 11.25 Larrys Rental $ Trailer Sales 2 trailers 3790.00 •MACO 1989 -1990 membership 112.50 MALEFI treas. membership 15.00 Memindex calendars 24.90 Mileys Springler System lawn sprinkler 11,700.00 Minne Sew Ta Vac repairs 21.25 Mn. Pollution Control AGency hazardous waste generator fees 42.00 Mn. Valley Forest Products wood chips 1105.00 NADA Appraisal Guides title book 20.00 Natl Arbor Day Foundation 2 USA signs 65.90 Priebe Engineering engineering services $ expenses 4444.28 Quinlan Pub. Co. grievance bulletin 45.92 Schlueters Refrigeration repairs 99.15 The Secretarian Lamp $ Walters hours 758.00 Senior Advisory Board farm show volunteers 344.00 Technical Inst. of Hutchinson work study students 1091.00 United Labs. chemicals 275.84 Wesleys Pharmacy film 9.99 Willmar Tech. Inst. 44 plan May 1989 98.00 Worum Chem. Co. chemicals 142.38 A $ B Electric equipment $ repairs 5290.58 Albrecht Oil Co. gasoline 272.43 Allen Office Products office supplies 10.40 Allied Mech. Systems repairs 91.16 Am. Welding Supply cylinder rental 6.50 Automation Supply Co. office supplies 76.22 Bremix Concrete Co. supplies 798.34 • Brandon Tire Co. repairs 110.83 Bennett Offic eSupplies repairs 6 supplies 307.30 John Bernhagen june compensation 1800.00 Cash Wise supplies 161.96 Carr Flowers plant -j. Mlynar 15.00 -4- Coast to Coast •Coca Cola Bottling Chamber of Commerce Copy Equipment Co. Tr.eaaurer Cash Wise Culligan Water Dons Foods Co.Recorder Earl F.Anderson 8 Assoc. Erickson More 4 Ericksons Oil Products Family Rexall Drug Farm & Home Farmers Elevator Assn. Feed Rite Controls Inc. Floor Care Supply Fitzloff Hardware Gopher Sign George Field GUardian Pest Control Hager Jewelry G $ K Services Henrys Candy Co. Hutchinson Coop Hutchinson Fire Dept. •Hutch Iron F, Metal Hutch Medical Center Hutch Utilities Hutch Wholesale Supply Hutch Fire $ Safety HCVN #10 ICMA Ink Spots Inc. Jerabek Machine Shop Juul Contracting Kokesh League of Mn. Cities Ins L $ P Supply Marco Bus. Products MSF MSF Trust McLeod Cooperative Power Assn Meeker Washed Sand Kenneth Merrill Midland Prod. Co. Mn. Elevator Inc. McGarvey Coffee Inc. Pitney Bowes Inc. Plaza Hardware Gary Plotz Pikal Music Store Richard Waage R $ R Specialties Inc. Schmeling Oil Co. Schramm Implement Sears supplies $243.26 supplies 491.75 rental,secretary services etc. 489.00 supplies 14.33 dl fees 187.00 supplies 45.79 salt & monthly service 55.30 supplies 71.17 recording Cond.Use Permits 20.00 traffic paint 3910.00 supplies $ film 70.33 film A 31.19 film $ pictures 111.97 supplies 241.81 dry fertilizer 338.53 chemicals 1656.59 cleaning supplies etc. 2201.61 supplies 259.35 signs 73.89 FMAM quarterly mtg 10.00 Pest control 17.50 ups charges 2.97 uniform rental 688.34 supplies for concessions 763.31 gasoline 4353.32 reimbursement for expenses 1607.00 iron 16.50 physical exam 76.50 gas $ electricity 18,723.47 supplies 94.69 repairs 147.15 cable franchise 750.00 dues 360.83 supplies 211.99 repairs 10.54 4" water service $ parts 2463.18 equipment and supplies 933.01 ins. on dictophone recorder 30.00 supplies 139.35 repairs 146.18 sanctioning fees 40.00 registration fees 36.00 airport electricity 301.55 sand 59.39 meeting expenses 26.74 concession supplies 41.01 elevator maintenance 54.85 coffee 57.90 postage meter rental 94.50 supplies 61.99 League of Cities convention 45.29 supplies 26.40 investigation expenses 76.54 supplies 60.50 gasoline $ diesel fuel 1052.87 mower.$ parts 357.70 blades 9.29 -5- LJ supplies $398.27 •Shopko Sorensen Farm Supply rental $ parts 54.95 Standard Printing copy paper 800.20 PERA employer contribution 4064.64 Star Cablevision june services 4.05 Town $ Country Tire part 6.00 Treasurer, State of Mn. airport license renewal 15.00 Two Way Comm. Inc. repairs 7.50 Tri Co. Water Cond. salt 73:80 U.S.West Com. leased phone line 326.50 Xerox contract payment 76.94 Zee Medical Services supplies 136.95 City of Hutchinson Dental Self Fund june dental ins. 1861.15 Mutual Benefit june LTD ins. 718.03 City of Hutchinson Self Ins. Fund. june medical ins. 14,422.21 & West Wash $ Dry washing mops 21.48 Water Products meter 416.98 Wm. Mueller $ Sons Inc, gravel 732.00 *Walker Tree:Service trees 3585.00 *J ami Emans state fire school 95.23 *HARP 55 Alive Mature Driving 245.00 *Dept. of Natural Resources DNR registration fees 545.00 *Dept. of Natural Resources application permit 75.00 *Menards Inc. airport hanger 99;655.00 *Hutchinson Post Office June Sr. Newsletter 167.37 County Court Adm. appeal fees 140.00 •*McLeod *Dept. of Natural Resources DNR registration fees 375.00 *Withhold Tax Acct. employer contribution 3746.06 *Hillyard Floor Care registration fees 20.00 *Dept. of Natural Resources DNR registration fees 462.00 BOND FUNDS Bonds of 1989 Juul Contracting construction costs $8496.51 Rickert Excavating construction costs 54,991.70 Bonds of 1988 Wm. Mueller $ Sons Inc. construction costs 37,711.06 Bonds of 1986 American National Bank paying agent fees 248.00 Bonds of 1980 First Trust bond principal,interest $ fees 98,486.88 Hospital Bonds of 1977 First Trust bond principal,interest $ fees 85,961.88 LJ 0 • 0 M MUNICIPAL LIOUOR STORE Quality Wine $ Spirits Co. wine $ liquor $2696.39 Ed Phillips $Sons wine F, liquor 1003.59 Johnson Bros. Wholesale wine F, liquor 950.49 EdPhillips $ Sons wine $ liquor 4850.21 Griggs Cooper & Co. wine F, liquor 4066.41 City of Hutchinson payroll 4394.90 Withhold Tax soc.sec. $ medicare 321.16 American Linen Supply towel service 21.20 Coast to Coast supplies 5.75 Hutchinson Telephone Co. phone service 77.22 Hutchinson Leader advertising 285.24 A.H. Hermel Candy Co. supplies 118.32 Bureau of Alcbhol special tax reg. card 250.00 Triple G beer $ mix 15,831.10 Lenneman Beverage beer $mix 21,491.70 Locher Bros. beer 12,270.80 Friendly Beverage Co, mix 680.55 Henrys Candy Co. supplies 153.38 Bernicks Pepsi Cola supplies 24.00 Electro Watchman alarm service 111.00 Schlueters REfrigeration repairs 394.15 Waldos Custom Carpet carpet $ installation 1680.00 Travelers Directory Service advertising 203.00 Hutch Utilities gas $ electric 529.90 Jack Weiss Sports Calendar advertising 85.00 City of Hutchinson insurance 1313.94 $ 73,809.40 0 11 �&AJ 1�4 FOR YOUR INFORMATION Mq f�,v MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY PUBLIC NOTICE ON PROPOSED AIR EMISSION FACILITY PERMIT AMENDMENT M01989 sC�'ED NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Director of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has made a preliminary determination to issue Amendment No. 1 to Air Emission Facility Permit No. 23BC- 87 -OT -1 to 3m Company [mailing address: P.O. Box 33331, St. Paul, Minnesota 55133 -33311 for its consumer products plant located in Hutchinson, McLeod County, Minnesota. The draft permit, amendment applies to the entire facility and authorizes the installation of a new pressure sensitive tape and label line and extruder for film backing and operation of same. The new -roduction a ui ment will increase actual emissions o y rocar ons or vo a ile organic compoun s (VOC) solvents) by 87 tons Der year with a potential increase of 177 tons per yefro Possible. a ermittee will install BAcT-Fb—egT- available control a ment) to abate the emissions in accordance with federal PSD (prevention of significant deterioration) rules and this BACT is adjudged to be equal to LAER (lowest achievable emission rate) technology. The BACT /LAER control equipment is a thermal oxidizer which converts the hydrocarbon/VOC emissions into harmless carbon dioxide and water at an efficiency of 95 %. The Permittee is also required by federal NSPS (new source performance standards) to limit emissions from the new production equipment to 0.20 lb VOC /lb coating solids applied. The emissions from the thermal oxidizer are limited to 0.037 lb VOC /lb coating solids applied under this Dermit. Federal PSD rules also required the Permittee to do an air quality impact analysis to demonstrate that neither NAAQS (National Ambient Air Quality Standards) nor the allowable PSD increment will be violated as a result of installation of the new equipment.. _Tba -t as,,:thr., concentration of hydrocarb�r) /VOC in the public air will not increase b too large am •! „ Y 9 1pQunty(PSD increments) and the concentration of hydrocarboii%VOC in the public air will remain at a harmless level (NAAQS). Federal PSD rules also required the Permittee to do an additional impacts analysis to determine the air pollution impacts on soil, vegetation and visibility due to the emissions from the new equipment and the impact from any associated growth resulting from said installation. The area will remain in attainment with the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone, and soil, vegetation and visibility will not be adversely impacted. The proposed duration of the permit amendment is until the expiration date of the permit or until March 25, 1992. The preliminary determinatio o issue Me permit amendment is tentative. There are three formal procedures for public participation in the Agency's consideration of the permit ate" x amendAf11'F � �it�R befor ha� decisi - 11 on on a appplication is OW made. These procedures are set forth in Minn. Rules p rtts� �'74Ui +62V0" d 7 i�t�i".`O�nd inclucfe''t"�We}?o� ow ng ( 1 ) interested persons may submit written comments on t1iie ro os �� p �d°p�:ermit amendment; (2) interested persons may request the Agency to hold a public information meeting; and (3) interested persons may request the Agency to hold a contested case hearing. • Interested persons who submit comments or requests to the Agency shall set forth: 1. a statement of the person's interest in the permit amendment application or the draft permit amendment; 2. a statement of the action the person wishes the Agency to take, including specific references to the section of the draft permit amendment that the person believes should be changed; and 3. the reasons supporting the person's position, stated with sufficient specificity as to allow the Director of the Agency to investigate the merits of the person's positions. The public comment period commences May 18. 1989 and terminates omments and requests should be mailed to: =�S i Jerry M. Liefert Division of Air Quality Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 All written comments and requests for public information meetings or contested case hearings received during the public comment period will be reviewed by the Agency. It is anticipated that the issuance of the permit amendment will be considered by the Agency Board on June 27, 1989 at the Agency offices, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, Minnesota. Persons who wish to address the Agency Board concerning the draft permit amendment should call Ms. Peggy Hicks, Agency Board Secretary, (612) 296 -7306, no later than three days prior to the meeting. A copy of the draft permit amendment will be mailed to any interested person upon the Agency's receipt of a written request. Additional materials relating to the issuance of this permit amendment are available for inspection at the Agency offices in St. Paul at 520 Lafayette Road North, 6th Floor, Division of Air Quality, phone (612) 296 -7607, or the Agency's Marshall Regional Office, RLC Building, 109 South Fifth Street, Marshall, Minnesota 56258, phone (507) 537 -7146 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. DATED: %(p� /48 7 - ilcnaei valentine irector Division of Air Quality Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 0 i 11 DAVID D. CHARLES R. R. G CAR RMIC HAEL OARY D. WDOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. HARRY ANDERSON STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA K. FRETLAND DAVID A. HRUEGGEMANN JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICHARD G. MCG£E May 23, 1989 ARNOLD & MODOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARE PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (612) 587 -7575 � I TELECOPIER (012) 587 -4008 RESIDENT ATTORNEY G. BARRY ANDERSON t Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 4� FOR YOUR INFORMATION 11F C.UwIEL WILLIAM w. CAMERON PAUL D. DOVE 5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410 (612) 545 - R000 MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545 TELECOPIER(612) 545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612) 389 -2214 T£LECOPIER(612) 389 -5500 n MAAY�119899 FWD* Re: New Dimension Plating, Inc. /Community Reinvestment Fund Our File No. 3188 -89 -0107 Dear Gary: I thought I would prepare a short note for you and the Council to review regarding the above referenced matter. No action will be necessary, but you might wish to distribute this letter to the Council at the next City Council meeting as an update on the status of this matter, at least with respect to the legal issues. You may recall that the City of Hutchinson approved the sale of the Note to the Community Reinvestment Fund, subject to City Attorney approval as to recourse issues. Specifically, for those not familiar with the recourse issue, the City was concerned that there be no further liability or exposure to the City on the original obligation; obviously if there were such liability, it might make sense for the City to retain possession of the Note and the security for the Note. I discussed and raised these issues with Frank Altman, and he did respond to me in writing and a copy of his letter dated May 12, 1989 is attached and included with this letter. Assuming that the City has done essentially what it promised to do, in terms of making disclosures and avoiding fraud and the like, there would not appear to be any recourse issue in this case. Mr. Gary D. Plotz May 23, 1989 Page 2 If you have any questions with regard to this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & McDOWELL G. L14And7tl--'�- erson GBA:lm Enclosure L 11 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND May 12, 1989 Mr. G. Barry Anderson Arnold & Mc Dowell Attorneys at Law 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mr. Anderson: This letter is in response to your letter of May 10, 1989 requesting clarification of the terms under which CRF will purchase a loan from the City of Hutchinson made to New Dimension Plating, Inc. Your letter asks whether CRF will purchase the loan without recourse to the City. With respect to the New Dimension Plating Loan, because the City of Hutchinson has not elected to sell the loan with recourse under the provisions of Article V, Section 2, Paragraph A of the attached Qualified Seller Agreement, CRF will purchase the loan without recourse to the City subject only to the provisons of Paragraphs B and C of that section. Article V, Section 2 governs the issue of recourse raised in your letter. Paragraph A discusses the conditions under which a loan may be purchased with recourse. The Seller has the right to chose to sell a loan with recourse, if agreed to by CRF in the Loan Purchase Agreement. CRF may permit Qualified Sellers to sell loans with recourse, if they desire to and can demonstrate to CRF's satisfaction that they are capable of honoring a commitment to replace or repurchase a defaulted or delinquent loan. Otherwise, loans are deemed sold without recourse subject only to the provisions of Article V, Section 2, Paragraphs B and C. These paragraphs essentially give CRF recourse to the seller in the event of fraud, factual misrepresentation regarding a loan or breach of the Qualified Seller Agreement or Loan Purchase Agreement on the part of the Seller. I hope this information answers the question you raised in your letter. If you have further questions, please call me at (612)338 -3050. S rely, r President FA:sw enclosure 1005 Foshay Tower 821 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 -2903 (612) 338 -3050 P (612) 587 -5151 I T Y OF HUTCHINSON /ASN/NGTON AVENUE WEST HINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 OR YOUR INFORMAII.O_H DATE: June 1st, 1989 TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official RE: Labor and Equipment Costs for Removing Trailers and Debris from Midwest Trailer Park Attached is a copy of the direct costs to remove the trailers from Midwest Trailer Park. Administrative, legal and storage costs should be included. Approval for removal or sale of any /all of the trailers must also include removal of the debris and accessories associated with the units such as fuel tanks, old block, skirting, etc... The Street Department has expressed intrest in retaining the 10' x 50' white trailer, Serial Number 502 -459 for the undercarriage. mom, #10x17 9OJame G. Marks Building Official JGM /pv attachment cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Doug Meier, Dir. of Maintenance Operations Marlow V. Priebe, City Engineer U,Mayor and City Council Planning Commission TO: FROM SUBJECT: (612) 587.5151 F CITY OF MUTCHINSCN 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 31, 1989 Jim Marka ------------------------ - - - - -- Doug Meier LABOR AND EQUIPMENT COST CONCERNING TRAILER PROJECT AT— MIDWEST MOBILE HOME PARK. On May 24, 1989, the City Hutchinson began the removal of house trailers from Midwest Mobile Home Park. This project was completed on May 30th, 1989. The labor and equipment costsare as follows: Employee - Full time " Part time Front end loader Skid Steer loader 1 ton truck and air compressor 2� ton truck(flat bed) 2-� ton truck (dump) 886 Tractor Miscellaneous materials and repairs such as bolts, nuts, steel, trailer hitch, tire repair Labor Cost 76 Hours at $12.00 per hour =$ 912.00 60 Hours at 4.50 per hour= 270.00 Equipment Cost 20 hours @ 63.00 = $1,260.00 24 hours @ 28.00 = 672.00 24 hours @ 13.00 = 312.00 24 hours @ 23.00 = 552.00 10 hours @ 23.00 = 230.00 4 hours @ 28.00 = 112.00 71.14 Total cost labor, equipment and materials $4,391.14 Note: Storage costs are not included in the total cost. • OM /bb DAVID B. ARNOLD CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL GARY D. M- DOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. BARRY ANDERSON STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA R. PRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICHARD G. McGEE ARNOLD 8c MGDOWELL FOR YOUR INFORMATION ATTORNEYS AT LAw 5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD UN6IL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-144.92 LLi OF OF WW. CAMERON PAUL D. DOVE (612) 545 -8000 ��/ MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545 GABLE MGAW TELECOPIER (912) May 9, 1989 1 .' "Y Gary Plotz1' City Hall �1 City of Hutchinson Hutchinson, MN 55350 Re: City of Hutchinson ` McLaughlin Property Matter Our File No. 3188 -87 -0001 Dear Gary: Enclosed please f Attorney, Michael property matter. Statutes cited by self - explanatory, �� L "I SOUTH FOURTH STREET i PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 ' A (0IER 389- 2214 (6 2) 38 . /``/( °, TELECO PIER (Ol2) 380 -5500 1 101 PARR PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (612) 587 -7575 TELECOPIER(612) 587 -4096 AA AY198VF+D ind an April 13, 1989 letter from McLeod County Junge, to my office in regard to the McLaughlin Also enclosed please find copies of Minnesota Mr. Junge in his letter. Mr. Junge's letter is however, I add the following observations: Minnesota Statute 5282.02, Subdivision 3, sets forth the procedure for a municipality to certify the costs of an improvement to a parcel of land to the county for collection of those funds. Of special interest under the McLaughlin facts is the statutory language that "[NO] sale of a parcel of land shall discharge or free the parcel of land from lien for the special benefit conferred upon it by reason of the public improvement until the cost of it, including penalties, if any, is paid." This language clearly reveals that the City's assessment survives the sale of the McLaughlin property to Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Minnesota Statute §282.01 permits the reinstatement of special assessments, therefore, permitting the City to impose upon Hutchinson, HRA the cost of the unpaid special assessment. The necessary conclusion is that the County's conduct with regard to the sale of the McLaughlin property was appropriate. It is the City's option now to either reassess and place the financial responsibility upon the HRA or do nothing, therefore, assuming the cost themselves. Gary May 8, . 198 1989 Page two Additionally, I have compiled the following figures tracing the proceeds from the sale of the McLaughlin property. According to the county auditors office, Hutchinson HRA purchased the property for $5,356.00. The following is a breakdown of the county's distribution of those proceeds: (1) $256.00 assurance fee to the State of Minnesota (2) $1,000.00 to the county for expenses (3) $4,200.00 to - (a) 408 to county (b) 408 to Hutchinson schools (c) 208 to the City of Hutchinson The 208 distribution to the City of Hutchinson noted in 3(c) totalled $818.15 and was sent to the City on February 7, 1986. The proceeds were distributed under the above scheme pursuant to Minnesota Statute 5282.08, Subdivision 3(c). (A copy of the Statute is attached for your convenience). In a number of telephone conversations, Mike Junge indicated that the County, prior to selling the McLaughlin property, discussed the matter with Hutchinson city officials. From those discussions, the County acted under the assumption that the City would reinstate the assessments against the property after the sale. The agreement between the City and County did not necessarily comply with the strict statutory requirements of 5282.08, however, the practical result of the agreement excepted the parties from the statutory requirements. If I can be of any further assistance in regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly ours, A ARNOL c WEL G. Barry Anderson GBA /sem Enclosure cc: Michael Junge RGM \3188 \01- LTR.04 0 0 McLEOD COUNTY ATTORNEY COURTHOUSE 830 11 th Street East Glencoe, Minnesota 55336 (812) 864 -5551 w_ MICHAEL JUNGE JOSEPH E. FLYNN JEANNE HJELMSTAD JIM NEWES MCLEOD COUNTY ATTORNEY ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY PARALEGAL INVESTIGATOR April 13, 1989 Mr. Rick McGee Attorney at Law Arnold and McDowell 5881 Cedar Lake Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 RE: Tax Forfeited Properties Dear Rick: Please allow this letter to confirm our telephone conversation of ,wh-ril 12, 1989. 1 will try to summarize the facts as I understand em. At the time of the tax forfeiture sale which took place in November or December 1985, there were special assessments outstanding in the amount of $4,108.56. It is my understanding that these amounts were attributable to $1,544.56 to house removal (Code 830), $229.14 attributable to water main (Code 909), $90.86 attributable to tree removal (Code 831), and $2,244.00 attributable to 1983 grading and surfacing (Code 959). It is my understanding that prior to the tax forfeiture sale, the McLeod County Auditor Ed Ide contacted Ken Merrill from the city and asked what would happen with the special assessments and was told by Ken Merrill that these special assessments were to be reinstated upon purchase. This is consistent with the past practice of McLeod County and is consistent with Minnesota Statute 282.01, Subdivision 3 and Minnesota Statute 282.251 which involves reinstatement of special assessments. At the time of the public sale, the auditor indicated what the appraised value was which was the minimum bid and also indi- cated the amount of the specials that were to be reinstated. Mr. Ide indicates to me that he informed the bidders of that prior to bidding. Thereafter, the property was sold and it is my understanding that all of the special assessments were reinstated. I have enclosed for your benefit the handwritten notes from Ed Ide, Oe McLeod County Auditor, which relate to the specials that were instated (these were his notes from the time of the sale in 1985). Also, enclosed please find a -copy of -his letter to me in April of 1985 which indicates that he has contacted the cities involved and the amount of the special assessments that were going to be reinstated. "AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" 1� Mr. Rick McGee Page 2 . April 13, 1989 Hopefully, this will clear up the confusion as to what has happened with regard to the sale of the McLaughlin place in Hutchinson which was purchased by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Sinccerelny', ' `--� Michael Junge McLeod County Attorney MJ:tb Enclosure 11 STATE TAXES '? TA7C- FQRFffiTED LAND SALES 282.01 a * 450AO% , ii u, ' state is suitable for use by such subdivision for any authorized public purpose, such tract by deed in the orate of the state to -forfeited `;, his section, my _ dly the commissioner may convey such subdivision upon the filing with the commissioner of a resolution of all the members of the governing body thereof, equal worth i :onveyed to said adopted by a majority vote the purpose for which the land is desired. The deed oft 450,000, or over, stating conditioned upon shall be upon a form approved by the attorney general All derived ject to the public continued use for the purpose stated in the resolution. proceeds revenue from such orfeited land so from the sale of timber, lease of hay stumpage, or other resources commissioner shall be Public use and xchange shall in lands under the jurisdiction of the natural into the general fund of the state. The county auditor, with the approval [innesota, if any, paid of the county board, may lease conservation lands remaining under the jurisdiction of the county board and sell timber and hay stumpage thereon in be y board. Lands the manner hereinafter provided, and all proceeds derived therefrom shall iservation lands, distributed in the same manner as provided in section 282.04. s lands primarily Subd. 3. Sale of nonconservation lands. All parcels of land classified as be as ded, or released ded, will be held nonconservation, except those which may be reserved, shall sold rovided, if it is determined, by the county board of the county in which the thin which such parcels lie, that it is advisable to do so, having in mind their accessibility, the effect of their sale lands classified their proximity to existing public improvements, and and occupancy on the public burdens. Any parcels of land proposed to be 3duction and as sold shall be first appraised by the county board of the county in which the lie. The may be reappraised whenever the county board urposes. If such :es, the lands so parcels parcels deems it necessary to carry out the intent of sections 282.01 to 282.13. In an it be :ard in the same lands. appraisal the value of the land and any standing timber on shall determined. No parcel of land containing any standing timber iservation al] klimited to separately may be sold until the appraised value of the timber on it and the sale of the The ze JWions of land have been approved by the commissioner of natural resources. on the and consider - commissioner shall base review of a proposed sale policy The decision of the commissioner shall be )lve that certain ations specified in subdivision 1. in writing and shall state the reasons for it. The county may a the �nservation uses decision of the commissioner in accordance with chapter 14. iturai resources. determines that In any county in which a state forest or any part of it is located, the county at least 30 days before the fast =an be managed -r shall auditor shall submit to the commissioner publication of the list of lands to be offered for sale a list of all lands included make a iereof on behalf on the list which are situated outside of any incorporated municipality. If, at of the sale, the commissioner notifies the county ismit the certifi. any time before the opening auditor in writing that there is standing timber on any parcel of such land, the _uditor s records to all lands so parcel shall not be sold unless the requirements of this section respecting the the approval of the appraisal by the •r of any and all the of separate appraisal of the timber and commissioner have been complied with. The commissioner may waive the purposes -ages, controlled requirement of the 30-day notice as to any parcel of land which has been ,blic recreation. examined and the timber value approved as required by this section. alated for such If any public improvement is made by a municipality after any parcel of for the nonpayment of taxes, and the ;1 resources and land has been forfeited to the state in against the property benefited by of natural re. ate and situated improvement is assessed in whole or part it, the clerk of the municipality shall certify to the county auditor, immediate - bdivision of the ly upon the determination of the assessments for the improvement, the total 413 0 $ 282.01 REAL ESTATE TAXES TAX -FORT amount that would have been assessed against the parcel of land if it had Interest on been subject to assessment; or if the public improvement is made, petitioned is payable a for, ordered in or assessed, whether the improvement is completed in whole Subd S or in part, at any time between the appraisal and the sale of the parcel of . terms the land, the cost of the improvement shall be included as a separate item and form, thesis added to the appraised value of the parcel of land at the time it is sold. No foOf rth forth the ter sale of a parcel of land shall discharge or free the parcel of land from lien for purer the special benefit conferred upon it by reason of the public improvement the deferrd eferr e until the cost of it, including penalties, if any, is paid. The county board shall any d determine the amount, if any, by which the value of the parcel was enhanced auditor's cer by the improvement and include the amount as a separate item in fixing the may, by Ord appraised value for the purpose of sale. In classifying, appraising, and selling declare such the lands, the county board may designate the tracts as assessed and acquired, thereafter re or may by resolution provide for the subdivision of the tracts into smaller rules as oche units or for the grouping of several tracts into one tract when the subdivision the county be or grouping is deemed advantageous for the purpose of sale. Each such such cartifiicz smaller tract or larger tract must be classified and appraised as such before in accord wii being offered for sale. If any such lands have once been classified, the board made on the of county commissioners, in its discretion, may, by resolution, authorize the right of er sale of the smaller tract or larger tract without reclassification. er, an c Subd. 4. Conduct of sale. The sale shall be conducted by the county original auditor at the county seat of the county in which the parcels lie, provided that, deemed a wil in St. Louis and Koochiching counties, the sale may be conducted in any when the c county facility within the county, and the parcels shall be sold for cash only auditor shall and at not less than the appraised value, unless the county board of the special assess county shall have adopted a resolution providing for their sale on terms, in scribed in the which event the resolution shall control with respect thereto. When the sale Subd. 6. D is made on terms other than for cash only a payment of at least ten percent of When any sale the purchase price must be made at the time of purchase, thereupon the 282.13, the au( balance shall be paid in no more than ten equal annual installments. No such informati standing timber or timber products shall be removed from these lands until revenue may p an amount equal to the appraised value of all standing timber or timber an appropriate products on the lands at the time of purchase has been paid by the purchaser, sale is on tern provided, that in case any parcel of land bearing standing timber or timber auditor shall s products is sold at public auction for more than the appraised value, the instances wher amount bid in excess of the appraised value shall be allocated between the lands held undo land and the timber in proportion to the respective appraised values thereof, Years, are still and no standing timber or timber products shall be removed from the land statement show. until the amount of the excess bid allocated to timber or timber products has commissioner c been paid in addition to the appraised value thereof. The purchaser is which the land entitled to immediate possession, subject to the provisions of any existing provided by sub board, valid lease made in behalf of the state. and whc revenue For sales occurring on or after July 1, 1982, the unpaid balance of the t r after it reasonable purchase price is subject to interest at the rate determined pursuant to section 549.09. The interest rate is subject to change each on the unpaid balance taxes ut year in the manner provided in section 549.09 for rate changes on judgment me, the time for e 414 282.241 TAR- FORFEITED LAND SALES such lands that will best serve the public interest If the county board has good muse to believe that a repurchase installment payment plan for a Particular parcel is unnecessary and not in the public interest, the county board may require as a condition of repurchase that the entire repurchase price be paid at the time of repurchase. A repurchase shall be subject to any easement. lease, or other encombrana granted by the state prior thereto, and if said land is located within a restricted ares established by any county under Law 1839, chapter 340, such repurchase shall not be permitted unless said resolution with respect thereto is adopted by the unanimous vote of the board of county eommb tionsra. Amended by law 1875, c. 316, 1 1; taw 1986. c. 444; taw 1997, e. 268, art, 7, 151, off. July 1, 1981. 1676 Amendment. Added "Except for proper, ty which was homesteaded on the date of forfcF tun" and " dorng one year only inn iM date of forfeiture, and in any cave" in the jut se. treat of this section Lows 1981, c. 1, lot Sp. art. 2 9 18, off, Jute 7, 1981, provides u follows. "Any pascal of property forfeited an of subso. qunt to January 1, 1978 and prior to December 31, 1978, the landowner of which would have retained the notice provided in section 16 if it had Mee in effect at the three the installment payment m She Property beesmse overduee, and which has sot base sold panwnt to chapter 282, may be repurchased "u t to section 262.241 t the comelaa�RppThla of the boad of aunty if provision .lamas apply rely "(a) the hedowsr car if the landowner is corporative, the corporation w the sharehaldere Of the corporation hdivldaalhy haw been the owner or owners of the property far a period of at least 15 years prior to the date of forfeiture,. tad during the pmbd of ownership ewrcest taxes some burly pad for a last sera were {ve Years; and "Ib) the investment of the landowner or if the taedowtw is a corporation, of the corporation or the shareholders of the corporation individually, in axss. spatial assess im. Watkins, interest and coatojeold pier to the forfaiture exceeds 3eA9o; a 1e1 prior to June 15, 1961, the landowner tandem to the mousy treasurer of the county in which the land is located, notwithstanding the Provisions of section 282261, full payment of the Who) coal of repurchase of the land as computed Pursuant to section 262.241 to 282.261." 1996 AmendmenL Law; 1986, a 4th, 1 1, removed gender specific reformers applicable to human beings throughout Minn Star, by adopt- ing by reference proposed amendment, for such nvlabn Prepared by the revisor of statutes pus sane ta Laws 1981, C. 480, 1 21, and cartified and Sed with the soentary of state on Jan. U. 1966. Section 3 of Law 1986, a 444, provides that On amendments "do not change the sub. suns of the statute amended." 1987 Lasidatlon The 1997 amendment permitted the county board ta "alre u a condition of repurchase that the eutoe repurchase price be paid at the shoo of repurchase if It has god cause to have certain specified Mliefs. Nolte of Decisions IL Time for repurchase The one7mr limitation contained in Law 1976, C. at g,1 1 annealing this section apples u Propmty Waited before the effective data of tha amen IZNL Op.Atty.Gen- 4251 -13. April 6, 1977. 282.261. Special assenments reinstated upon repurchase Upon the repurchase of land pursuant to section 282.241 any special asomements heretofore canceled because of forfeiture of sold lard for nonpayment of taxes shall be reinstated by the county auditor and any such special Hseasments 96 reinstated which are payable in the future shall be paid at the time and In the manner said special assessments would have been payable except for forfeiture, except that special assessments payable in the year In which repurchase is made, shall be paid in full at the time of repurchase. The sum of such special assessments that would, armlet for forfeiture, have been levied and assessed against such land between the date of forfeiture and the date of repurchase and which would here been payable prior to the year In which repurehsse Is made shall be Computed by the aunty auditor and included in the purchase pia hereunder. When an application to repurchase a parcel of land is made hereunder the county auditor shall compute and determine an in the ease of omitted taxes, upon the basis of the gross tax apeity of such parcel In effect at the time of tortekuro, tM amount of taxes that would low Men asa[ased and IWkd 4gainst such paresl between the d4ta of forfeiture and the date of repurchase, and ilss amothnt so detarmhasd with pensltles and eats, with Interest al the nu fixed 67 taw for tM uapeethe yeah shall 6e insiuded In the purchase price 94 TAX-FORFEITED LAND SALES § 282.261 hereunder. When the term "delinquent taxes" is used in section 282.241, it means the sum of taxes and assessments together with penalties and costa, with interest at the rate fixed by taw for the respective yeah computed to the date of repurchase from the time such taxes and assessments became delinquent, and also the sum of taxes and sasem, ments with penalties and costs, with interest at the rate fixed by law, for the respective ycon to the date of repurchase from the time such taxes and assessminta would have been delinquent that would have been levied and assessed against a parcel between the date of forfeiture and the date of repurchase, computed by the county auditor in the manner provided by this section. The county auditor shall levy taxes on the parcel as In the rose of omitted taxes for all the years in which on account of the forfeiture an tax was levied. Amended by taws 1988, e. 719, art 5, 1 84 Laws 1991, c. 1, let Sp., arL 2, 6 18, eft June 7, 1981. provides as followa: "Aqv parcel of property forfeited on or subse� quent to January 1, 1976 and prior to December 61, 1978, the landowner of which would have rerahM the notice provided in section 16 if it had been in effeet at the time the installment payment on the property became overdue, and which has not been sold pursuant to chapter 282, m.y M repurchased pursuant to section 282 .241 without the approval of the board of county mmmiuionen. This provision shall apply only if 'tea) the landowner or if the landowner is a corporation the corporation or the shareholders of the corporation individually. have been the owner or owners of the property for a period of tut 15 yam prior to the date of forfeiture, and during the period of ownership current taxes wen timely pad far at least oven successive yarn; and '7b) the investment of the landowner or if the landowner Is a corporation, of the corporation or the shareholders of the corporation individually, in taxes, special asaeeements, puldn, interest and costs paid prior to the forfeiture exceeds 68,000; and "(e) prior to June 15, 1981, the landowner tenders to the county te"urer of the county In which the land is located, notwithstanding the provisions of section 282261, full payment of the total east of repurchase of the land as computed pursuant ta s ions 292.241 and 262.251." 1988 Legislation Laws 1988, C. 719, art 5, 6 84, directed the revisor of statutes to change the weds "a► cued value" or "assessed valuation" who they appear in Minnows Statutes to "gross m capacity' In Minnesota Statutes 19ea and "net tax capacity" in Minnesota Statutes 191011 SuppM ment and subsequent edition of ties stauW except 1 275.011, and change the as "m® rata" wherever they appear in Mtasesnta Steno utes to "tax capacity nu" in Minnesota Ststoess 1988 and subsequent editions of the statutes except 1 275.011. 282.261. Terms of repurchase Subdivision 1. Payments; taxes. A person repurchasing under section 282.241 shall pay at the time of repurchase not lees than onrtenth of the repurchase price and shall pay the balance in ten equal annual installments, with the privilege of paying the unpaid balance in full at any time, with interest as provided in subdivision 2, the first installment of principal and interest to become due and payable on December 91 of the year following the year in which the repurchase was made, the remaining installments to become does and payable on December 31 of each year thereafter until fully paid. The person shall pay the current taxes each year thereafter before they become delinquent up to the tune the repurchase price has been paid in full. Subd. L Interest rate. The unpaid balance on any repurchase contract a ad by the county board on or after July 1, 1982, is subject to interest at the rate determined ppX unt to section 549.09. The interest rate is subject to change ewh year on the unpaid bnew in the manner provided in section 549.09 for rate changes on judgments. Interest on the unpaid contract balance on repurchases approved before July 1, 1982, is payable at the rate applimble to the repurchase contract at the time that it was approv Suhd. 3. Alternative treatment of nonhomestesd property. A county board of eaumiuionen may by resolution provide that the installment arrangement in subdivision I is not applicable to monhomesuad property and that this subdivision applies instead. if the resolution is approved, the minimum downpaym rnl shall be 20 percent of the reptrehasa price and the balance shall be payable in four equal annual insWlmems. A resolution shall remain in fora for at lent one year after approval and shall be appllsd 95 tre r ° *1XroxPsn-2D 1AND entered.' Op.Atty.Gen.1930. No. 445, � of 'mica mamaayy not be P°0d by fai east DpAt4'.Oen.1938, Na 13% p• 66L 2. +: 'nowt. F 653, owner. Trust fund lands Where state aunt fund lands sold under s of 'mere ofd for delinquency °tote zed ref Kew 4 amfrieitedpdYto State school lands sold on certificate and interest and toes 16 � 2164 -5 (see, now, forfeited for nonpayment of taxes, ppu�rsuant to StSupp. treasurer 9 tY �� � the trust teeame trust fund lands and not merely tax 281.16 -281 {°]tereri nts forfeited lands held In trust for the taxing m a d accepted muted redemption under 4 92.21. Op reds under district. op.Atty.Gen., 7011 -D. Nov. 26, 1945. Gen.1938, No. 442, p. 87 -B-9, htarch 282.08. Apportionment of proceeds from the sale or rental of any parcel of forfeited land, or efts for county The net proceeds from the sale of any products therefrom, shall be apportioned by the county follows: I no part of . IOU was to be auditor to the taxing districts interested therein, as an amounts included in the 'hour power to n rsEeneftt� (1) Such portion as may be required to pay y value under section 282.01, subdivision 3, as representing increased of such parcel to dam appraised public improvement made after forfeiture value due to any p of the MUnici- h _ ount certified by the ;d before state the state, but not exceeding be appo �oned o the municipal subdivision thereto; re proceedings. ditor until after pality, shall (2) Such portion of the remainder as may be required to discharge any Parcel for drainage or other lists had been special assessment chargeable against such deferred at the time of forfeiture, shall be aPPor- op.Atty.Gen., purpose whether due or tioned to the municipal subdivision entitled thereto; and fated lands to -overed that as. (3) Any balance shall be apportioned as follows: aside no more than 30 naintenance of rare lands were (a) Any county board may annually by resolution set to be used for timber development on A nW°at s � percent of the receipts remaining expended under the dedicated memorial forests, to ndonly his boo wss tax- forfeited land and on projects board. It shall be expo No. 309, p. 439. supervision of the county approved by the commissioner of natural resources. set aside no more than 20 1Oents erty subsequent. (b) Any county board may annually by resolution percent of the receipts remaining to be used for the acquisition and mainte- defined 39831 to uta�tedyupon a nance of county parks or recreational area supervision ty mod °WOerdLliL OP. 398.36, to be expended under the paragraph (i) or avail (c) If the board does not (b) any balance remaining be apportioned assffO�llows: county. 40 school district, 40 percent, and if the 3 state all back and percent; town or city, 20 percent, h (a) or (b) the balance under uptown anaepu bad Am deeds board avails itself of the authority or city, and school remaining shall be apportioned among the county, rovlded, however, above stated p card. es were paid so district in the proportions in this paragraph territory that portion which should accrued to the red unless there :d and unpaid that in unorganized el of commissioners. township shall be administered by the county 1949- 366. Amended by laws 1947, c. 553. ii 1; Iaws s. !i'1 eff. June 2, 1967; Latan 111969• c c. Laws 1%3. c. 519, li 1; Laws 1967, FxSese , u can«Il� quitclaim dad 9.3 73, eff. Feb. 12,1969; Laws 1969, c. 7 haws 1982, a 523, art 39.E 119, eHSMarch 123, art. 5, S equent taxes an 'Um paid and June 5, 1971; Laws 1973, e. 23, 1982; Laws 1987, c. 384, art. 1, 156. 445 ARNOLD & MGDOWELL ATToaNEYs AT LAW DAVID s. ARNOLD "Si GznAa Las ROAD or 000RRd OAMY D. R.OWELL AEL MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66419 -1492 GARY D. x�DOweyL 311177AV W. OAMEROH STEVEN A. ANDERSON (612) 646 -9000 PAUL D. DOVE O. BARRY ANDERSON MN TOLL Fazz BOO -3403 -4545 STEVEN S. HOOK LAURA K. FRETLAND GABLE MGLAW MINNEAPOLIS "I SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55391 DAVID A. BRUEOOENANN TELECOPIER (012)5,5 -1723 JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT (SIR)�9 -2214 TELECOPIER(612) 369 -5506 JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS 101 PARK PLACE RICHARD O. McGEE HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 (612) 587 -7575 TELECOPIER(612) 567 -4096 June 7, 1989 FOR YOUR INFORMATION &A f8oro,' Mr. Gary D. Plot: �� •�(' ^!1988 r Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West 0) Hutchinson, MN 55350 BY v 9�s2�£2ZZti�a� RE: Baumetz, Brandon, Wagner & Zabel v. City of Hutchinson Court File Nos.: 21489, 21490, 21491 & 21492 Our File No.: 3244 -88 -0020 Dear Gary: This letter is for the purpose of advising you that a pre -trial conference in this case has been set for July 17, 1989 at 10:45 a.m. If you would kindly advise the council of the status of this file, I would appreciate it. I would expect this case to go to trial sometime next fall. Thank you. Very truly yours, FF (612) 587.5151 C/TY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION DATE: June 1, 1989 TO: Barry Anderson, City Attorney FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official RE: Dangerous Excavation On May 31, 1989 this office verified that the Notice of Order to Fill Dangerous Excavation at 402 Hwy. 15 North was not completed. Please proceed immediately, through appropriate City action to complete this order. JGM /pv cc: Planning Commission Gary D. Plotz, City Administt for Mayor and City Council :! ' u /�� 904n lb #10'17 James G. Marka Building Official STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF McLEOD FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ----------------------------------------------------------------- Craig Reese and Peggy Reese, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) VS. ) NOTICE OF ORDER TO FILL DANGEROUS EXCAVATION City of Hutchinson, ) Defendant. ) ----------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Persons having a record interest in the property located at 402 Highway 15 North, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350. Pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statute Section 463.25 and Minnesota Statute Section 463.21, you are individually and collectively ordered to fill the excavation located at 402 Highway 15 North, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350, legally described as follows: Lot 12, Block 12, North Half of Hutchinson, excepting the north 92.00 feet thereof and excepting the south 50.00 feet thereof. Also excepting the following described tract: Beginning at an iron stake on the east line of said Lot 12, a distance 92.00 feet southerly from the northeast corner of said Lot 12; thence westerly, parallel with the north line of said Lot 12, to an iron stake on the west line of said Lot 12, which is 92.00 feet southerly from the northwest corner of said Lot 12; thence southerly, along said west line of Lot 12, to an iron stake which is 158.00 feet northerly from the southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence easterly 30.00 feet to an iron stake which is 158.00 feet northerly from the south line of said Lot 12; thence southeasterly to an iron stake which is 37.60 feet easterly of said west line and 143.00 feet northerly of said south line; thence easterly to an iron stake on said east line of Lot 12, which is 138.00 feet northerly from the southeast corner of said Lot 12; thence northerly, along said east line, 0 -1- to the point of beginning. The excavation located on said premises, having been left open for more than six months without proceeding with the erection of a building thereon, and the excavation not having been filled to grade or otherwise protected after a building is destroyed, demolished or removed, you are hereby ordered to fill the excavation to grade as required by statute. If you fail to comply with the order within fifteen (15) days after servic f the order, the cost of any corrective action inc u ing expenses incurred in the cost of any corrective action, taken by the City of Hutchinson, shall be charged against the real estate as provided by Minnesota Statute Section 463.21 (1974). Dated: April 25, 1989. Attest: Gary D. lotz City Ad nistrator CITY OF HUTCHINSON 0 By P41JZ4W 1— Paul L. Ackland, Mayor -2- . FOR YOUR INFORMATION [J i, Hutchinson Public Schools 30 North Glen Street community edu IOn Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Phone(612)587 -28W CRECFJVM May 26, 1989 Dear Friend, Each year about this time, Community Education has scheduled a meeting with all the governing bodies within the school district. The purpose of this meeting is set up by law to promote cooperation and communication between the governing bodies within the school district. I would like to take the liberty to schedule the meet- ing for Wednesday, June 21 at noon in the Central District Services Building. A light lunch will be served and the meeting will be confined to one hour. Each group representative, hopefully, can relate to problems, concerns or issues at their level of government as a means of information for the entire group. It is the hope that this session can be used to inform and to discuss anything of mutual interest and produce an attitude of sharing and cooperation between levels of government. Please mark iP*,onesday, J 211 12 [ ydKw calendar and return the.l>fnESiosed post Z to ourice . Sincerely, Jim Mills Director, Community Ed. "People Make The Difference" Ll • • oft@ of McLEOD COUNTY Zoning Administrator 830 11 th Street East - Court House GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55338-2270 Phone 864-5551 Ext. 259 EDWIN E. HOMAN Administrator June 12, 1989 Hutchinson City Hall Attn: Mr. Gary Plotz, City Clerk 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: McLeod County Recycling Plan Dear Mr. Plotz: � %- + -16` JUN1989 D�� a�EWW 8Y_— FOR YOUR INFORMATION On Tuesday, June 6, 1989, the McLeod County Board of Commissioners voted to accept the recommendations from the McLeod County Solid Waste Advisory Committee. The recommendations were as follows: 1. The Solid Waste Advisory Committee selected both Asgard Sanitation and Kubasch and Sons to provide the recycling services as per their proposals. 2. The County will agree to pay an equal half of the actual cost of the recycling collection project with each participating municipality. 3. Kubasch will receive the cities of Winsted, Lester Prairie and Plato because of previous contracts. 4. The cities of Glencoe and Hutchinson must select either Asgard Sanitation or Kubasch and Sons within 30 days from County Board approval to receive reimbursement. 5. Other cities will not receive consideration until 1991 as per the McLeod County Solid Waste Plan. Municipalities excluded are Biscay, Stewart, Brownton and Silver Lake. Cities may request consideration in writing by submitting a recycling plan. 6. Contract terms, payment, obligations, etc. will be prepared by McLeod County. Mr. Gary Plotz June 12, 1989 Page Two In regard to recommendation #4, the County Board desires to have the City Council select either Asgard Sanitation or Kubasch and Sons to provide the drop box recycling service. Enclosed for your review are copies of the proposals submitted by the two firms. Also enclosed is a summary sheet outlining the cost estimates and recyclable material that will be collected by each contractor. This correspondence will serve as a notice to both contractors of the Board's decision and hopefully induce a conference with all involved to establish a recycling drop box site for your community. If you have any questions or need further assistance regarding this project, please contact me. Sincerely, Edw`�-n`. Homan McLeod County Solid Waste Officer amk enclosures CC: Asgard Sanitation Kubasch & Sons, Inc. i J is 4 COST ESTIMATES FOR RECYCLING SERVICES IN McLEOD COUNTY DROP BOX CHARGE PER MONTH PER BOX City *Asgard * *Kubasch * * *D.J. Hutchinson $ 70.00 $ 125.00 $ 25.00 Glencoe " " " of N/A Lester Prairie it " N.C. $ Winsted It " N.C. of " Silver Lake if it 125.00 " Brownton " " It It to " Stewart " " " to It " Plato " " N.C. It " Biscay It " 125.00 It " * Aagard has a $35.00 minimum service per box per pull. Example: Hutchinson = 2 boxes 4 times per month pickup = $280.00 Glencoe = 1 box 4 times per month pickup = 140.00 Recycles glass, paper and aluminum. ** N.C. for three cities as they presently offer recycling service to those cities. Recycles glass, paper, aluminum and tin. • * ** D.J. Enterprise will service Hutchinson only and all 14 townships. Recycles everything. * Aagard's $1.50 charge includes providing container ** D.J. Enterprise offers no charge to Hutchinson residents. Not applicable to other cities at this time. CURBSIDE RECYCLING PER HOW PER MONTH City *Aagard Kubasch **D.J. Hutchinson 1.10 /1.50 $ 1.50 N.C. Glencoe of " " It N/A Lester Prairie " " it " to " Winsted " if Silver Lake " to Brownton " " " Stewart Plato Biscay * Aagard's $1.50 charge includes providing container ** D.J. Enterprise offers no charge to Hutchinson residents. Not applicable to other cities at this time. v F PROPOSAL FOR RECYCLING SERVICES TO CONDUCT /II4llZENT A RECYCLING PLAN FOR MCLEOD COUNTY KUBASCH AND SONS, INC. WSAW Removal SerAcs P.O. Box 809 Whwted, MWOODW 88398 (612) 188 -2372 McLeod County Zoning Administrator Edwin E. Home, Administrator 830 11th Street East Glencoe, Minnesota 55336 PROPOSAL AND SCOPE OF SERVICES: April 17, 1989 RECEIVE APR 1 7 1989 McLeod County Zoning Offic-, Gle Our proposed services will include working with cities and townships within McLeod County. We feel each governmental unit has specific needs based on location and population. It is our desire to tailor each program to the respective governmental unit. PROJECT TEAM: • Kubasch and Sons, Inc. is a Minnesota Corporation located at 128 6th Street North, Winsted, Minnesota. Kent K. Kubasch is President /Treasurer and Kevin M. Kubasch is Vice - President /Secretary. These two individuals would be the contact persons for the entire scope of the project. Kent is 32 years of age and has extensive background in the waste industry. Kevin is 35 years of age. Total years of waste industry in- volvement is more than 25 years. Kubasch and Sons, Inc. currently provides 14 full and part-time positions. WORK PLAN: Realising that the City of Hutchinson is in contract litigation regarding its current waste removal contract and that the City of Glencoe has indicated that it may wish to pursue recycling activities with its own staff, it is our intent to deal with these hurdles on an individual basis. Currently, we have in place yard waste compost projects in the cities of Winsted, Lester Prairie, and Plato. On April 17, 1989, we implemented a recycling drop off box in Lester Prairie. It is our intent to implement them in Winsted and Plato within 60 days. Realizing this is something new for McLeod County, we feel it best to ease into the project. Keeping costs to a minimum is vital to the success of any recycling program. After gathering some facts and figures from our existing recycling efforts in McLeod County, we would be ready to implement further drop sites by the summer of 1989. is KUBASCH AND SONS, INC. waste Removal swvlcs REFERENCES: City of Winsted, Minnesota 485 -2366 Mayor, Don Guggemos Council.member, Bob Kegler City Clerk, Betty Zachmann City of Lester Prairie, Minnesota 395 -2646 Mayor, Eric Angvall Councilmember, Roland Eruckschen City Clerk, Marilyn Pawelk City of Plato, Minnesota 238 -2224 Mayor, Tim Pinske Council — er, Diane Schrader City Clerk, Kathy Stuuedeman COST ESTIMATE: • Winsted, Lester Prairie, Plato no charge for drop boxes. P.O. Box 800 WkWN4 Wmesom 68306 (612) 18&2972 Other remaining cities and townships - $125.00 per drop box per mouth (sites to be mutually agreed upon) Curbside collections to be rated at base charge of $1.50 per month per occupied dwelling. At the time of the implementation of the project, each recyclable item(s) being collected will be rated at the current market value. (glass - x $ per ton, newsprint - x $ per ton, and so on.) Any future rate negotiations would use this as a base along with fuel, labor, insurance, and other associated cost factors. At this time, until we know which cities and townships will participate and what type Of program they wish to pursue, it is impossible to put a total cost estimate on this project. CONTENT OF PLAN: All collections will be provided by industry approved vehicles and containers. All Processing will take place at our 5 acre industrial zoned property in Winsted, Minnesota. All financing arrangements will be from within. Our insurance limitations are $19300,000 on all vehicles. A contract should include language that both the govern- mental unit and contractor are happy with. As we have stated in the first paragraph of this proposal, each governmental body has specific needs. In order to write an . acceptable contract, we feel all parties must agree on all specifics. KUBASCH AND SONS, INC. P.O. Boot we Wl m6K MkMeola 66996 (612) 486.2972 It has been our pleasure to submit this proposal for review. Sincerely, EMASCH AND SONS, INC. Rent K. Kubasch President • A • Sanitation it SUMMARY OF MCLEOD COUNTY RECYCLING PROGRAM SERVICE PROVIDED BY AAGARD SANITATION, INC. Under this proposal, Aagard Sanitation, Inc. will provide McLeod County with a comprehensive recycling program which will provide recycling opportunities to all McLeod County residents. The "reduce, reuse, and recycle" strategy will allow McLeod County to meet its 25% recycling goal in 1993. Abatement activities, as outlined in the McLeod County Solid _Waste Manauement Plan include waste reduction, recycling and yard waste collection. The recycling program will include collection, processing, and marketing of recycable materials. Key system components include a Recycling Station, located at the McLeod Landfill, nine drop -off centers to be establish- ed throughout McLeod County and a multi - material curbside program for the City of Hutchinson, and or, Biscay, Brownton, Glencoe,Lester Prairie, Plato, Silver Lake, Stewart, and Winsted. Newspaper, glass, and aluminum cans will be collected at the drop -off centers. Arrangements have been made to utilize the recycling facility at the McLeod Landfill for transfer and storage of the material collected from the drop -off centers. McLeod Landfill, Inc. will also provide arrangements for cooperative marketing of materials collected by Aagard. An extensive public education and promotional program will be implemented to introduce the concept of recycling to the County. Information will be provided on an ongoing basis on the details of the recycling opportunities to be provided. McLeod Landfill, Inc. will provide a site for the Recycling Station. The site will consist of roll -off containers arranged in a herring bone fashion to receive source separated materials from drop -off centers and private citizens. Aagard Sanitation will provide transportation and marketing, using its existing fleet of vehicles and trailers to back -haul materials to markets in the Twin City area. 875 No. Prior Ave. -St. Paul, MN 55104_ Phone (612) 645 -1388 A nn HHa iHnV Page Two Sanitation ;T Aagard Sanitation will provide service to the drop -off centers on a biweekly, weekly basis or more often if required. Curbside service will be provided every other week to residents in McLeod County. Under this scenario a total of two hundred tons per month will be recycled from the two programs. 875 No. Prior Ave. -St. Paul, MN 55104_ Phone(612)645 -1388 (2) PROJECT TEAM AAGARD SANITATION, INC. is a commercial hauling and recycling company, providing service to over 1400 customers in the Ramsey, Hennepin, and Carver County areas. The fleet of sixteen trucks consists of rear - loaders, front - loaders, roll -offs, a cardboard re- cycler, office paper recycler, glass recycler, and transfer truck. The business is now in the tenth year of existence. The staff consists of 26 dedicated and hard working employees. OFFICE: Marilyn Botten Christine Brunkow Norma Burnside Timothy Herman Dennis Fredrickson Andrew Schweizer . Patrick Spiczka Warren Winkelman SHOP: Curtis Barnes Ronald Haabala Steven Monroe Clark Moyer William Michaelson POSITION: Administrative Assistant Controller Account Representative Director of Business Development Operations Manager President Account Representative Account Representative POSITION: Mechanic Shop Foreman Mechanic Welder Painter DRIVERS: Shawn Albrecht Peter Fossan James Kroyer Donald Bendickson Timothy Lynaugh Duane Morris Thomas Renstrom Darrell Sandstede James Taplin John Chromey Bruce Schroeder Robert Turtness Marlen Harris AAGARD is setting up a branch in Norwood, MN. to service Carver and McLeod County's recycling and solid waste needs. AAGARD has the experience, equipment and people power to get the job done. • • POSITIONS: Route Driver Roll -Off Driver Route Driver Container Delivery Route Driver Route Driver Route Foreman /Route Driver Route Driver Roll -Off Driver Route Driver Route Driver Route Driver Transfer Driver AAGARD is setting up a branch in Norwood, MN. to service Carver and McLeod County's recycling and solid waste needs. AAGARD has the experience, equipment and people power to get the job done. • • (3) WORK PLAN A) Assuming a contract award of May 1st, 1989, equipment would be ordered and available for service July 1st. B) May and June will be spent training personal. C) Drop of sites will be determined and approved. J 0 (4) FEIST BLANCHARD COMPANY COPY SALES REFERENCES EBERHARDT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT BIEHN BUILDING. RIVERSIDE BANK 1207 2nd Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55405 Attn: Diane Blanchard Phone: 377 -7972 3017 27th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55406 Attn: Joel Lund Phone: 729 -2368 P.O. Box 1385 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Attn: Joan Remus 2701 Park Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55407 Attn: Marian Biehn 1801 Riverside Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55454 Attn: Bruce Nystrom 341 -3505 7 McDonald's Restaurants currently recycle with Aagard. Contact names will be supplied upon request. W' • is (#5) A) COST ESTIMATE CURBSIDE RUBBISH DROP BOX CURBSIDE RECYCLING CURBSIDE RECYCLING SERVICE & FREE RECYCLING CHARGE PER PULL PER HOME PER HOME & RECYCLING CONTAINER PROVIDED CONTAINER PROVIDED & FREE 90 GALLON CART PROVIDED Hutchinson $35.00 $1.10 per Mo. $1.50 per Mo. NA Glencoe " " " $9.00 Lester Prairie " NA Winsted NA Silver Lake NA Brownton " NA Stewart NA Plato NA Biscay NA DROP BOX CHARGE The minumum service per box would be every other week, or $70.00 per month per box. Citizen participation will effect the number of pickups per month. We hope to see citizen participation requiring weekly pickup. Cost will depend on the number of drop boxes the county uses. EXAMPLE: Hutchinson 2 boxes, 4 times mo. pickup $280.00 Glencoe 1 box, 4 times mo. pickup $140.00 monthly total $420.00 12 month total $5,040.00 Aagard recommends starting with every other week pickup for 3 months and then increasing to weekly pickup. For routing purposes boxes will be serviced on the same day, weekly or by- weekly. EXAMPLE: Glencoe box, every other Wednesday (5) B) COST ESTIMATES - DROP BOX PROGRAM TABLE B -1 CAPITAL COSTS TOTAL COSTS On -Site Mobile Equipment Drop -Off Containers $2,200 $6,600 Loader $22,000 $22,000 Loader Attachments $5,000 $5,000 $43,600 Semi - Trailer Vans $5,000 $10,000 Remote Facilities Drop -Off Containers $4,000 $36,000 Truck Equipment -Hook- $12,000 $12,000 $48,000 lift Contingency (100) Total Capital Costs TABLE B -1 CONTINUED OPERATING COSTS Labor Utilities Equipment Maintenance Building Maintenance Insurance Legal & Accounting Truck Lease Gas & Oil Transporation Administration $18,000 $1,200 $2;000 $1,200 $4,000 $900 $6,000 $3,200 $1,000 $2,200 $9,100 $100,700.00 $39,700.00 • is 012) ! 9 Ae... a H - U - T - C - H - 1 - N• S - O•N Mole N•N•E•S -O -T•A 37 Washington Ave. W. • Hutchinso 350 VVU Newsletter of Ma eet - Hutchin n May, 1989 Volumo11 Iss y 2 Committee Reports! /C �/ v r 1�� y The Design Committee is off and running! I Members are - Connie Mangan- chairperson, Colleen Willhite, Dick Goebel, Geri John- son, and Jan Carney. At their first meeting they developed objectives and set out a workplan table. ners for Main Street headed their list. eneral banner is being screened right now and is called MAINSTREET - Hutchinson. The building featured is the original Barber's building. This is just a rough example. The final product will look wonderful in rich color! W ^^W''.:■ Sir's n■:r11.916 HUTCNINSON We hope to see the banners hanging on Main Street by June 12th. The co77ittee will also be thi. ^.king of Christmas banners, and s as well. They hope to a disign contest for fut nnera so we can get the community nvolved on Main Street! Other topics being addressed are parking issues, window displays, and Christmas decorations. All these issues are sure going to keep them active. They'll keep us informed on their progrdss. Promotions, Promotions, Promotions....... Boy oh boy do they have their hands full! Members are, Gary Moen - Chairperson, Jay Beytein, Call Hlder, Peter Brynldeon, Darlene Olson, and Linda Poirer. Their first meeting consisted of brain- storming to develop a month by month analysis of Nutchineon`a current down- town promotional events. They then picked out some of the promotions and assigned individuals to gather information on the events and ideas to better them. Some such promotions were Crazy Days, Christmas, Arts and Crafts Festival, Monday Nights, Water Carnival, Farmer's Market, and Special Events. Following are some successful advertising clips which other communities have used, and we will use too! Advertising does make a big differ- ence! They also discussed the basic rules for promotions. A. Insist on Quality B. Add something new to retail sales to make them special C. If an idea works, add something nee if you do it again. 1 t W ^^W''.:■ Sir's n■:r11.916 HUTCNINSON We hope to see the banners hanging on Main Street by June 12th. The co77ittee will also be thi. ^.king of Christmas banners, and s as well. They hope to a disign contest for fut nnera so we can get the community nvolved on Main Street! Other topics being addressed are parking issues, window displays, and Christmas decorations. All these issues are sure going to keep them active. They'll keep us informed on their progrdss. Promotions, Promotions, Promotions....... Boy oh boy do they have their hands full! Members are, Gary Moen - Chairperson, Jay Beytein, Call Hlder, Peter Brynldeon, Darlene Olson, and Linda Poirer. Their first meeting consisted of brain- storming to develop a month by month analysis of Nutchineon`a current down- town promotional events. They then picked out some of the promotions and assigned individuals to gather information on the events and ideas to better them. Some such promotions were Crazy Days, Christmas, Arts and Crafts Festival, Monday Nights, Water Carnival, Farmer's Market, and Special Events. Following are some successful advertising clips which other communities have used, and we will use too! Advertising does make a big differ- ence! They also discussed the basic rules for promotions. A. Insist on Quality B. Add something new to retail sales to make them special C. If an idea works, add something nee if you do it again. They are also working on providing a unified image for our downtown. They discussed establishing an identity for individual businesses through advertising anp to promote the flown• town as an area with a distinct identity. One such example we could use is the, "Everyone is coming back Downtown" clip. Everyone Is coming bock Downtown. ®e �® 9A G al amNra Naga 0 NNg nmN. aamca, p eNawni Nk.. as vnarN.nwa.n a"s .alapnF... sass Os bWbna br boa as mbk. a aanmlanmanb OlNrxp M 4NM n baNa to alma Nnwp pxu. aanmm" ula F11eMl aaabnNnl W nxnn aNa. L QCoe :=— Enjoy dw persalgl bush at mat 136 chaps 8 restamanla.... eM while you in the orighbwhood. sap by IaSalb fa smle �Cyh Wed Downtown Stores are open till 9PM aa.b.st sawn bR yM as ye ae.s a.ae rr � uneu.lr rheew�+ne+s For continuing success, downtowns need to physically improve themselves, to run aggressive, well - designed promotional programs - -and to manage their operations. Membership and Development The Membership and Development committee chaired by Jo Willmert includes the follow- ing members... John Miller, Lloyd Torgrimson, and Fritz Schmeling. This committee is developing our membership list Emy Suxk 10am -2pm MayU-Nokemba22 1a 0 ,..... 010 T..n ,n.em CmrW a E: /aa. IOn aw. Y-. lam. 1g HomeGrown Fresh Vana6ln NN Fn.a bkm Ga . W., gad lae .L 1. h Also, they are developing fundraising strategies. Here is our current member- ship list: Carney's Crow River Warehouse Quade Electric Quade's Sporting Goods The Village Shop Hutchinson Telephone Company State Farm Insurance -Mark Westmiller G.F. Nemitz Sons Waddell and Reed Financial Services Richard Peterson Star Surplus Store Fahey Sales Agency, Inc. Family Rexall Drug Hutchinson Leader Firstate Services, Inc. Peter's Restaurant and Lounge Hager Jewelry Home Bakery Wally Pikal Music Store John E. Miller - State Farm Insurance Juffer Family Vision Care Spencer's Shoes Jandy's Inc. Alrick's Clothing State Farm Insurance - Michael McGraw Jensen Law Office Westlund Associates Greenbriar Floral The Glass Apple Citizens Insurance Agency Hometown Realty Crow River Vetinary Clinic Hennen Furniture McCormick Enterprises U date - Downtown Revitalization Project Ingleman Design y onnie Mangan Mr. Richard N. Lennes Ink Spots, Inc. Sprinkling of Basements- A public hearing S WFinancial Services was held before the City Council on May oricare of Hutchinson 23, 1989. The City Council voted to orocee Hutchinson Diet Center with the project and requested full engin- MORE 4 eering reports. The preliminary engineer- Carly's Shoes ing report calls for the sidewalks to be Mr. Movies used for the water mains. This would be an World Travel Service excellent time for landscaping the side - Woods Painting and Decorating walk areas and adding such things as trees Steve Reid Floor Covering and flowers and flower planters. Century 21 Hutchinson Sewing and Vac Center Hutch Hotel Project - John Korngiebel has Medicine Shoppe Pharmacies an option on the property. He has com- Don's Red Owl pleted his drawings and is working on his Rix's Downtown Service, Inc. financial package. He anticipates con - Hutch Cafe struction to start in the fall. Anderson Interiors, Inc. Edward D. Jones and Company Downtown Revitalization- Ten projects are Vinyl Window Systems underway. It takes some time for me to get Aubony all the paperwork done, so give yourself at Kock's Jewelry least thirty days lead time. Call me at Citizen's Bank 587 -5151 to get your project going! Firstate Federal Na First National Bank of Hutchinson First Bank of Minnesota momic Restructuring 1'ne Ecomomic Restructuring committee is chaired by Gary Blythe. The members are Bob Carney, Mike McGraw, Jim Fahey, and Beth Hepola. The committee will be doing a building inventory, mapping out our retail mix, and plotting out available space and rental costs. If any of these committees appeal to your interests, please give any member a call and join us! Or give me a call at 587 -5394 between 8:OOa.m. - 12:00 p.m. and I!11 set you up on a committee. N.Vi..`.4.�.N.S.0.N Y.I. M.N. {.$.�.1.• Orstchan Niomists Project Manew 1 so 6!7.63W Hutchinonn, MN 55350 5/19/84 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES MINNESOTA SIUN PAGE VOR YOUR INFORMATIIIi HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ( BALANCE SHEET APRIL 30, 1989 r� 3 • w +s ELECTRIC GAS M as • w w w• w w TOTAL +s r+ ASSET_S_ _ e UTILITY PLANT - AT COST - -- -- I+ LAND & LAND RIGHTS 140,963.10 13,978.10 154,941.20 ( I1e� - DEPRECIABLE_ UTILITY PLANT 23,066 156.38 2,419,456.31 25,485,612.6.9 _ TOTAL UTILITY -PLANT - -� -- 23,207,119.48 - - - -_ -- - - -- 2,433,434.41 - - -- -- 25,640,:,53.89 - LEM ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 11,968,320.75CR 1, 034, 220,03CR _ _ 13,002,540 78CR Iw TOT ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION 11,968,320.75CR 1,034, 220.03CR 13,002,540.78CR ( CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 132,615.78 17,964.36 150,580.1.4 nos; TOTAC-CONSTRUCTION IN-PROGRESS- - -- - _ —� - -- 132,615.78- - -_ - -- - - - - -- 17,964.36 150,580.14 - ins TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE 11,371,414.51 1,417,178.74 12,788,593.25 ( in RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS •s FUTURE EXPANSION & DEVELOPMENT 11800,000.00 1,250,000.00 3,050,000.00 =`.T - -SAVE FOR FUEL OIL 750 000.00 ---- -J - - -- 738,000.00 - - ( MEDICAL INSURANCE 60 000.00 40,000.00 100,000.00 + ITA - OPERATING & MAINT RESERVE 200,000.00 INSURANCE LOSS 300,000.00 300,000.00 ( CONTRIBUTION'- CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37,500.00 37,500.00 BOND &_INTEREST PAYMENT 1986 _ ._272,,359_20 272,359.20 1 BOND RESERVE - 392,008.00 392,000.00 ( c CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND 750,000.00 750,000.00 ¢oi FEDERAL INTERPRETATION 627,295.81 _ 627,295.81 t MAIN REPL __ ACEMENT FUND - 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 ( e TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS & ACCOUNTS 4,561,559.20 2,9 }7,295.81 7,479 155.01 CURRENT & ACCRUED ASSETS ( CASH IN BANK 173,679.54 555,877.31 729,556.85 INVESTMENTS & SAVINGS ACCOUNTS .446,063.36 108�598.BB 554,662.24 CONTRACT 49 816.86 49,816.86 ( ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 827,397.17 332,701.99 1,160,099.16 INVENTORIES 513,748.80 60,968.07 574,716.87 �q PREPAID INSURANCE 15,709.91 2,738.93 18,448.86 ( ; ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE 198,909.57 SU8,765.22 307,674.79 TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED ASSETS 2,175,508.35 1,219, %7.28 31394,975.63 ( DEFERRED CHARGE + BOND DISCOUNT 1986_ 85,337.97 85,337.97 + TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE _ - - - - --- -- _- ------- -- - -- - -- 85,337.97 85,337.97 ( M. pa TOTAL ASSETS - 18,194,120.03 3,353,941.83 23,745,061.06 ( r M ( s� ( + s s 5/19/85 HUTCHINSON UjftrIES COMMISSION HUTCHI MINNESOTA BALMW SHEET APRIL 30, 1989 IICIPAL EQUITY & LIABILITIES _ MUNIC�AL EQUITY - -- -_ . MtWaCIPAL EQUITY UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS CONTRIDUTION TO CITY TOTAL, MUNICIPAL EQUITY PAGE 2 0 x r w ELECTRIC x w x w w r w w GAS r r r w x w w r w TOTAL x w w x 13,621,309.78 4,943,423.28 18,564,733.06 455,015.00. _.__330.721,..59 785,736..59 112,50 ©.00CR 112,500.0008 13,963,824.78 5,274,144.87 19,237,969.65 LONG 7SRM LIABILITIES -NET OF - - - CURIVW MATURITIES I BONDS____ _ _ _ _ __ __3_, 5_SO_, 000.00 _ _ 3,510,000.00 TOTAL LONE. TERM LIABILITIES - 3,510,000.00 3,510,000.00 -- ,_,_.CONBTR CONTRACTS &ACCTS PLAY RETAIN TOTAL CON67kUCTION & ACCTS PAY CURRIO f & ACCRUED LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - ^ - -- - - -- 469, 872.89- - - - - -- 254, 270.56 724, 143.45- _ -- I &ITMST ACCRUED 76, 467.99 76, 467.99 ACCT PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANY 20,318.58CR 5,406.65 14,911.93CR ADD PAYROLL 19, 304.50 - 4, 066.07 23, 370.57 -� - -- ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE 77,803.84 16,048.68 93,852.52 CUB70PER DEPOSIT$ _ ._ _ 9105.57 _ 97, 105.57 OTiU471 CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES 39.04 5.00 64.04 TOTAL .CURRENT & ACCRUED LIAR 720,295.25 279,796.96 1,000,092.21 TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIAB 18,194,120.03 5,553,941.83 23,748,061.86 (0- 9 - 5/19/89 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION PAGE I ELECTRIC DIVISION HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF INCOME & EXPENSES FOR YOUR INFORMATION APRIL 30, 1989 CURRENT MONTH r wi r r YEAR-TO-DATE INCOME STATEMENT REVENUE SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY 684,118.90CR 2,879,488.56CR NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES 2,383.43CR 9,114.13CR -------- tMkITY LIGHTS-- POLE RENTAL 1,916.25CR TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 687,567.83CR 2,694,780.94CR OPERATING EXPENSES FWXMUCT ION OPERATION 87,912.72 196,117.82 • TOW MAINTENANCE 4b2.61 43,G -. 9 PURCHASED POWER 345,399.43 1.609,497.12 • TRANSMISSION OPERATION 2.96 80.65 Tobvj4s-m-l--es-l6f4- MAINTENANCE �---- E 326.00 16,277.57 DISTRIBUTION OPERATION 12.178.31 57,648.48 DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE 8'986.69 36.007.56 b(P --------------- - -----5—.641.14 OMER U SES CUST N 24,733.19 CUSTOMER SERVICES 733.13 3,376.45 ADMINISTRATIVE & GENERAL EXPENSES 55.811.14 223,555.06 DEPRECIATION 81.500.00 304.900.00 TOTAL OPERATING*EXPENSES 604,974.07 2,514,388.19 OPERATING INCOME 82,593.76CR 38@, 3912.75CR OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS OTHER -NET 774.39CR 984.59CR INTEREST INCOME 31,634.65CR 127,413.98M MISC INCOME/EXPENSE 5,137.00CR 6,223.68CR INTOWEff—C)CPENSE -V — S-10-00.00 60.006.00 TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS 22,546.04CR 74,622.25CR NET INCOME 105,i39.80CR 455,015.000R (0- 9 - r r o■ 0� m a m. a a W, a r. a x x. a. HUTCHINSON U IES COMMISSION HUTCHIN MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF INCOME 6 EXPENSES APRIL 30, 1989 PAGE 2 5/19/89 x x YEAR -TO -DATE x x GAS DIVISION HUTCHINSON U IES COMMISSION HUTCHIN MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF INCOME 6 EXPENSES APRIL 30, 1989 PAGE 2 x x CURRENT MONTH x x x x YEAR -TO -DATE x x �OME STATEMENT OPERATING REVENUES SACS$ 331,211.43CR 1,878,346.000R 1 032.2 4 697 TOT OPERATING REVENUE 332,243.72CR 1,883,043.42CR OP� EXPENSE.. ______ - - - -- - - MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION 153.08 912.11 MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE 112.59 PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE 237.978.57_ 1,435,029.15 .._ D IBUTION OPERATION - - _ _ -� - -14,108.90 60,308.44 DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE 825.86 6,959.32 _CUSTOMER EXPENSES CUBT@1ER SERVICES 3,757.32 488.75 2,250.96 - - - -- ADMINISTRATION A GENERAL 28,965.59 87,836.85 DEPRECIATION 7100_00 28,400.00 _ _ TOTAL. OPERATING EXPENSES - 293,378.07 1.638,290.99 OPERATIMG INCOME _ V_ 38, 865.65CR 244,752.43CR OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS OTHER - NET 84.48CR 229.19CR _ INTEREST INCOME — - - - 21,029.58CR 84,239717CR MISC INCOME/EXPENSE 343.95CR 1,500.80CR TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS 21,458.91CR 85,969.16CR _ INCOME 60,323.66CR 330,721.59CR _. i 0 E 0 HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT REGULAR MEETING Monday, May 1, 1989 The meeting opened at 8:00 p.m. John Reynolds gave a report on the VCR Camera and we have quotes from Kables for about $950.00. A motion was made by Dick and seconded by Larry to purchase the camera from Kables. The motion passed. Town Board meeting will be set for May 11, 1989, at 8:00 p.m. The Truck Committee reported that Engle was the only bid for the tank. The chassis was bid by 3 firms and it will be decided on 5/2/89 what to recommend to the Town Boards. The following bills and runs were read: General Account City Account U.S. Postmaster 25.00 Hutch Wholesale 56.76 Dakota County TI 750.00 Town & Country Tire 6.50 Ink Spots 15.80 Wesley Pharmacy 10.67 Greenbriar Floral 86.23 Harvey Kemper 18.60 Lester Prairie FO 10.00 Jeff Dobratz 15.00 CashWise 12.15 Coast -to -Coast 7.50 Crow River C. C. 1,575.25 Coast -to -Coast 18.45 Total $2,474.43 74.43 Hutch Hospital 33.90 Total Total $1371T Rural Account Coast -to -Coast 8.40 Dan Zieman 8.75 Hutch Wholesale 6.84 Larry Thompson 1.75 Crow River C.C. 184.22 Bruce Precht 1:50 Brad Emans 6.25 City of Hutchinson 1,140.00 Randy Redman 9.75 Don's Red Owl 3,99 Dick Popp 18.50 Hutch Leader 19.21 John Reynolds 1.50 Total ;1,410.66 Runs 4/1 Evergreen 4/18 High School 4/4 Drill 4/20 Froemning 417 HTI 4/21 Dakota Rail 4/10 Hospital 4/21 10 -52 4/10 Seifert 4/26 Park Elem. 4/10 Drill 4/27 Goebels 4/11 Hospital 4/28 10 -52 4/13 Hutch Plumbing 4/28 Mutual Aid 4/13 Maus 4/29 Buboltz 4/14 Anderson 4/29 Cenex 4/15 Woods 4/30 Lingbeck 4/18 Homan Motion was made and seconded to approve the runs and bills. Winsted Fire Dept. is having a centenial celebration on May 25, 1989. HUtCHINSON FIRE DEPT. MINUTES 5/1/89 The American Legion invited us to attend the May 29, Memorial Day Parade and participate in it. Motion was made and seconded to table Harvey Kemper's misconduct charges until the June meeting. Motion passed. Gary Forcier reported we are sending out bids to repair 231 for the ladder defects. Brad reported the law states you can have a 3" square light and it is used to enter an emergency scene. Brad reported there are 19 extra pagers and a company is offering $50.00 a piece. Motion was made and seconded to sell 15 of the pagers with the city's permission. Motion passed. Brad reported we can sell some of our bunker pants. Motion was made and seconded to sell if we can. Motion passed. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Secretary, Jamie Emans 0 Bids on tanker International Chevy Ford HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL MEETING Monday, May 8, 1989 39,868.85 39,901.24 41,622.00 ��Y4fIMN :'}ri Motion was made and seconded to accept the Wigen Chevrolet bid for the tanker. Motion passed. Secretary, Jamie Emans HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES OFFICER MEETING Monday, May 8, 1989 The meeting opened at 9:00 p.m. Brad reported that we have only received one bid for 231 ladder repair. Brad reported that 15 pagers have been sold. Randy reported that we have a barn to burn on Hwy 7 West. It was decided not to do it. The meeting adjourned at 9:25. p.m. Secretary, 0 Jamie Emans FOR YOUR INFORMATION HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL MINUTES May 22, 1989 12:00 Noon HuTCHINSON FIRE STATION Program was given by Mike Monge, County Civil Defense Director, on Sky Warn, severe weather warning in our county, and the interaction with other counties and agencies. Meeting was called to order at 12:47 by President John Reynolds. Old Business 1. Senior class party prizes. 2. There has been some response on letters sent out to potential new members. This item discussed briefly. 3. Report from Leslie Smith. The trailor is not available from the state for use at the county fair. Other possibilities approved by vote of the membership are Vince and Larry Crash Dummies, costumes that are worn. If they are available we will try to seek volunteers from the clown club, Boy Scouts or Girl Scouts, drama club or others. 4. Les Linder suggested a program on cold weather to be held later. 5. Meeting place - Park Towers won't be available, the Library or Historical Center were discussed as possible alternatives. Watch close for next meeting location) New Business 1. Leslie Smith suggested doing something regarding boat and water safety via KDUZ -KKJR and the Leader. 2. Emil Rix requested payment of $25.00 for stamps. This was approved by the membership by voice vote. 3. Budget was discussed should it be raised from $150.00 per year to $175.00 or some other figure. No action was taken, it was tabled for possibly more thought and research. 4. Next meeting will be June 26, 1989 (watch for location). The program will be Carol Bufton, president of the Minnesota State Safety Council. Meeting was adjourned at 13 :10. Secretary Jean Ward Acting Secretary George F. Field TREASURER'S REPORT: Postage Checking Balance Savings Balance: $185.78 25.00 $160.78 $169.17 FOR YOUR INFORMATION PIONEERLAND LIBRARY BOARD MEETING In the absence of our Chairman and Vice Chair, Howard Turck was unanimously elected temporary Chairman and the meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM. A motion to accept the April 10 minutes carried (Manke11 /Buchanan). Conradi/ Kubasch moved approval of the Treasurer's Report for April. Carried. We looked briefly at the auditor's report which indicated the accountants found our finances in order. Clippings and statistics were passed around. Upcoming events of interest to the Trustees are: 1)Workshop- Communication Skills -May 12- Willmar; 2)An informational meeting on Library Districts will be held in St. Cloud on June 14. May 8, 1989 PRESENT: Jeanette Buchanan representing Willmar Nancy Alsop " Litchfield Shirley Nowak " McLeod County Lorna Carlson " Swift County Richard Post to Kandiyohi County John Nevins to Dawson Ric Emery to Willmar Carol Conradi " Willmar Gladys Nelson Ortonville Kathleen Kubasch McLeod County Orlynn Mankell " Kandyohi County Noel Phifer Glencoe Stan Jacobson " Chippewa County William Scherer to Hutchinson Jack Langen to Swift County Arlen Lacombe to Big Stone County Anne Macguire to Lac qui Parle Cty. Howard Truck " Meeker County Judy Oestreich " Litchfield ABSENT: Steve Boehlke* ° Chippewa County Sandy Casper* Gravecille Jan Kreie* " McLeod County Marian Miller* Meeker County Linda Ulrich* " Renville Linda Willmsen* Hutchinson Shirley Schutt* Kerkhoven Dorothy Tebben Chippewa County Laverna Birkland Kandiyohi County Peg Mossberg Kandiyohi County Elizabeth Erickson Appleton Margaret Jenner Bird Island Joe Schriefer To Hector *Excused Absences In the absence of our Chairman and Vice Chair, Howard Turck was unanimously elected temporary Chairman and the meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM. A motion to accept the April 10 minutes carried (Manke11 /Buchanan). Conradi/ Kubasch moved approval of the Treasurer's Report for April. Carried. We looked briefly at the auditor's report which indicated the accountants found our finances in order. Clippings and statistics were passed around. Upcoming events of interest to the Trustees are: 1)Workshop- Communication Skills -May 12- Willmar; 2)An informational meeting on Library Districts will be held in St. Cloud on June 14. The motion to approve the payment of bills passed (Nelson/ Emery). Concerning Extension of Access, Mr Sunberg and Mrs. Matson met with persons from Clarkfield to answer questions concerning projected costs and responsibility. While all counties are mandated to join an established Library System as of January 1, 1990, island cities still have a choice on whether to join or not. Mr. Sunberg informed us that LDS will approve state aid for Fy 1990 (July 1, 1989 -June 30, 1990) for any jurisdictions which sign an Agreement before July 1, 1989 to join PLS effective January 1, 1990. A book will be placed in the Dassel Library in memory of Robert Arens, a member of our Board who passed away recently. Tentative plans were made to hold a Trustee Workshop October 30 sponsored, in part, by LDS. Jack Cole, president Of MELSA and HCL Boards will be the presenter. Board members are asked to let Mrs. Matson know which topics, of the nine available, they would most like to hear. A motion to implement the Non - resident Fee Policy Change as presented by the staff was carried (Post /Emery). The new Policy is as follows: Beginning July 1, 1989, the non - resident fee will be waived for residents of governing units which have signed a contract by July 1 to participate in Pioneerland beginning January, 1990. Whenever a contract is signed after July 1, 1989, by a governing unit to become a member of PLS, the non - resident fee will be waived for the rest of 1989 for residents of that govern- ing unit. Upon waiving of the non - resident fee, the customer will be reimbursed on a pro -rated basis from the payment date until the time of free service. The 1990 Proposed Budget was then presented by the Finance Committee, showing an overall increase of 4.23 %. A motion was made to accept this budget (Nelson/ ). This motion was not carried. Langen /Post moved to table the budget until the Legislature has finished this session. The motion passed. Post /Emery moved to authorize Mr. Sunberg to approach the three counties and five cities which will /may join PLS with a written agreement to join. Carried. The Automation Fund CD at Norwest Bank in Montevideo is due to be renewed. The motion carried (Oestreich /Conradi) to renew at the same bank unless an interest rate greater by a .5% can be found. The need to replace Jeff France on the Personnel Com- mittee was referred to Chariman Boehlke by way of a carried motion (Oestreich /Buchanan). The motion carried (Emery /Oestreich) to give Mr. Sunberg the authority to advertise for bids on our old van. Next meeting will be for full board on June 12. Meeting was adjourned at 9 :35 PM. Respectfully submitted, Judy Oestreich, Secretary 0 0 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM May 1989 Treasurer's Report Carol Conradi, Treasurer BUDGET INCOME BUDGET INCOME MTD YTD BUDGET lance $193,988.81 $125,373.26 Receipts: Basic State /Federal Aid 3,632.00 62,485.00 256,000.00 Big Stone County 11,044.50 22,089.00 *Chippewa County 36,922.50 *73,845.00 Kandiyohi County 53,069.00 106,138.00 McLeod County 35,145.00 70,290.00 Meeker County' 32,611.00 65,222.00 Swift County 17,280.00 34,560.00 Appleton 4,675.00 9,305.00 Benson 9,304.50 18,609.00 Glencoe 12,856.00 25,712.00 Graceville 1,937.50 3,875.00 Hutchinson 28,070.50 56,141.00 Kerkhoven 1,994.00 3,988.00 .Litchfield 19,987.50 39,975.00 Ortonville 6,394.00 12,788.00 Willmar 43,420.00 86,840.00 Bird Island 3,544.50 7,089.00 *Dawson 4,911.00 * 9,822.00 Hector 1,617.25 3,234.50 6,469.00 *Madison 5,71430 *11,429.00 Renville 3,857.00 7,714.00 Cash Receipts S Sales Tax 3,415.08 19,359.11 49,500.00 Gifts 2,065.00 4,027.95 2,000.00 Interest (No report) 2,487.99 8,000.00 Reimbursements (local govt) *Chippewa County *Dawson *Madison Benson (materials only) Chippewa Co. (materials only) 4,000.00 Montevideo (materials only) 21000.00 Other Reimbursements Other Total Receipts Other Funds Glencoe Fund KCWL Family Ties Fund Large Print Fund TOTAL RECEIPTS 6 BALANCE: is 952.96 17,682.29 2,800.00 214,471.10 16,014.00 2,736.00 1,750.00 1,500.00 20,000.00 2,000.00 3,565.81 471,898.36 6,800.00 2,615.00 606,686.62 Page 1 (OVER) *32,028.00 * 5,472.00 * 3,500.00 2,048.00 18,234.00 12,000.00 5,931.00 1,066,613.00 1,532.38 1,786.00 9,100.00 2,615.00 1,081.646.38 May 1989 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM TREASURER'S REPORT (Continued) EXPENDITURES: -- - - - - -- - NTD . EXPENDITURES VTD _! OF EK► - EIPENOITUREiS TC _ CURRENT EST BUDGET LIBRARY - -` - -" - -. _ _ __ ACCT GROUP... .00 PERSONA% SERVICES _ .00 - .00i .00 SALARIES AND WAGES NEAITN INSURANCE -- -- - _______ HEALTH '_54x785.25 1.365.59 277.158.27__ _ 40.952 6769820.00 INSURANCE - DEDUCTIBLE 104.64 6. 779.06 32.28; - 21x000.00 _ _RETIREMENT INSURANCE - 5.223.97 1,430.93 26,330.89 47.70% 39000.00 MATERIALS ACCT GROUP... 61,479.45 311,699.15 43.71% 40.96% 60.240.00 -_ -BOOKS - ADULT 7ELr06C.00 BOOKS - CHILDREN - -'- --- - - - - -- - GENERAL REFERENCE 7,875.64 3'719.75 29,673.47 11x164.59 - 37.09% 10x000.00 --- PERIODICALS 1,494.05 6,174.95 55.82% 51.46% 20,000.00 -_- -_ PAMPHLETS - _ -- - - 254.15 2.796.97 13.32% 12,000.00 214000.00 BENSON LIBRARY MATERIALS __._- COUNTY LIBRARY 7.10 151.85 108.17 1x625.06 36.062 300.00 _CHIPPEWA MATERIALS --- - - - - -- -- MONTEV1 EC MATERIALS 2,910.10 18.2_8_9_.02_ 79.351 128.49% 2,048.00 8Mm C 16MM FILMS .00 •00 _ .00% 14,234.00 12.000.00 .- ,_._VIDEO _DISCS C TAPES AUDIO DISCS AND TAPES - -- - - - - -- •CO 103.00 1,BCO.CO 2.437.71 46.15% 50.79% 3,9CO.00 SLIDES AND FILM STRIPS 26.90 122.14 61.07% 4x800.00 200.00 MICROFORMS •00 •00 BINDING -- --- •00 •00 .00X 250.00 ACCT GROUP... CATALOGING 457.93 17x000.37 680.12 74,872.20 .0C% 71.59% 200.00 950.00 -. OCLC AND OTHER CHARGES 43.56% 171,892.00 COW VENDOR CHARGES •00 3,115.00 8.549.95 47.SC% 14,000.00 VEHICLES ACCT GROUP... 3,115.00 9.448.12 IT s998.07 74.562 12.671.00 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE S 8.68% 30.671. INSURANCE AMORTIZATION 774.96 14039.12 4.878.86 2.616.31 32.53% 259000. ACCT GROUP... COMMUNICATION 'C0 1481h.08 23,081.45 30,576.62 174.42% 577.04% 1.500.0 4.000.00 TELEPHONE AND LINE CHARGES - 149.15% 20.500.00 TERMINAL MAINTENANCE 757.26 3.767.23 44.32% 8.500.00 -- POSTAGE AND SHIPPING _ - - - -- _- •00 954.41 550.00 $5.00% 1,000.00 ACCT GAO UP... 10711.67 4.075.15 89392.38 48.51% 8.400.00 ,EQUIPMENT NEW EQUIPMENT____ 46.84% 17,900.00 ___ AIV EQUIPMENT -- -- '" -- ' - -- - -- - - 106.66 - 29296.35 114.82% 2.000.00 MAINT ENENCE AND CONTRACTS •00 651.58 93.08% 700.00 - -- ACCT GROUP... OTHER - "- - -- - - 728.96 835.62 7.421.23 309369.16 61.84% 12.000.00 CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT 70.54% 14r70C.00 __SUPPLIES AND .P.R-INTING 34.98 814.92 81.49% 1,000.00 PROMOTIONAL AND PROGRAMMING - -- 29378.55 99360.12 _ 46.80% 209000.00 MILEAGE AND MEETI.-4rS - STAFF MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES .00 582.50 626.20 20108.85 125.24% 38.34% 500.00 PROF. MEMBERSHIPS ITRUSTEESI - - - - -- - - 111.12 967.63 30.24% 59500.00 39200.00 INSURANCE -- - -�- --- --- -- - - .00 306.00 76.SC% 400.00 ADS AND LEGAL NOTICES •00 99686.00 307.622 99000.00 - _AUOITiNG _ - _ •00 13.80 13.SC% 1C0.00 BOOKKEEPING - - ---- CONTINUING EDUCATION .00 225.00 11500.00 __125.00% 19375.69 45,862 1.200.00 -- - ACCT GROUP... SPGLENC --- 150.00 3.542.15 150.00 269909.21 30.00% 39000.00 5CO.00 GLENC OE FRIENDS, 1983 60.61% 44.4CO.00 KCWL _ LUC AL EQUIPMENT - - -- - - -- .00 200.00 .00 250.00 .ODE 14.00% Is532.38 AUTOMATION FUND ILOCALI •00 180.50 .004 1.786.00 .__ STATE SALES TAX .00 •00 .30% .00 FAMILY TIES FUND - - 212.40 674.97 58.60% .00 19500.00 LARGE PRINT FUND •00 •00 .00% 6r300.0 - _ACCT GROUP... - -- - -- - .00 412.Y0 .00 1,309.47 .0C% 2.615.0: ORG. TOTAL... 69,910.14 _ 482,126.26 9.532 13x733.38 44.86% 1,074.846.33 ENDING CASH BALANCE $124,560.36 $124,560.36 Paae 2 • MVSEN ENGINEERS I ARCHlTECFS /PLANNERS • • 1. Contracts 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55;17 672 464 0272 G MEETING AGENDA CITY OF HUTCHINSON CITY HALL STUDY JULY 17, 1989 I A. Review final draft of Agreements. 2. Study Outline A. Present proposed study outline to City for review and comments. 3. Project Schedule A. Present detailed project schedule to City for review and comments. 4. Identification of Project Committee Members A. City Staff representation. B. City Council representation. 5. Begin Study A. Schedule staff interviews. B. Collection of building data. 1. Existing drawings. 2. Investigation of building systems. 6. Maxi - Audits 7. Other Discussions DML /me SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN A a 0 KEY Weekly Meetings • HUTCHINSON CITY HALL TIME SCHEDULE Overall Project Review J AUG. SEPT. QQT- PHASE Mon. 117 124 131 7 114 21 28 4 ill 118 25 12 I � ANALYSIS OF EXISTING BUILDING I SPACE REQUIREMENT ( I WORKSHEETS INTERVIEWS I PROGRAMMATIC I I I ISSUES BUILDING CODE I Z Lu I REVIEW Q SPACE I 0 I 0 IONS O I gr Z ONCEPTS I I N LL O I W I ARY COST U. I ES/ W 0 ATION OUTLINE I T REFINEMENT OPTIONS [FUNDICNG I IONS AND ENDATIONS � � I I • 1J STUDY OUTLINE PART I: PROGRAM A. INTRODUCTION 1. Task force participation 2. Mission statement 3. Description of goals and objectives 4. Description of schedules and meetings B. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING BUILDING 1. Circulation: Existing floor plan flow diagram. 2. Space Utilization: Diagram of existing space usage. 3. Structural System: Statement of existing structural systems and conditions. 4. Mechanical System: Statement of existing mechanical systems and conditions. 5. Electrical System: Statement of existing electrical systems and conditions. 6. Acoustical and Lighting System: Statement of existing acoustical and lighting systems and conditions. 7. Historical Background: Statement of Historical significance of building. B. Site Issues: Diagram defining existing • site conditions, such as location of utilities, visual orientations, community impact, access, property and easement locations, etc. 9. Community Impact: Statement on how the community utilizes the existing building. C. SPACE REQUIREMENTS 1. City Admin.: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 2. Finance Director: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 3. City Engineer: Summary of space requirement worksheets. • 4. Fire Chief: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 5. Police Chief: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 6. Park & Rec. Dir.: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 7. Utility Managers: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 8. Motor Vehicle Department: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 9. Downtown Coordinator: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 10. Planning Dept.: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 11. Building Insp.: Summary of space requirement worksheets. • • 12. General: Summary of space requirement worksheets. a. Meeting rooms b. Lunch areas C. Common areas 13. Economic Development Coordinator: Summary of space requirement worksheets. 14. Housing Redevelopment Authority: Summary requirement 15. Seniors: Summary requirement 16. Council Members: Summary requirement of space worksheets. of space worksheets. of space worksheets. is D. INTERVIEWS WITH RESPECTIVE DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVES 1. Finance Director: Meeting notes of interviews. 2. City Admin.: Meeting notes of interviews. 3. City Engineer: Meeting notes of interviews. 4. Fire Chief: Meeting notes of interviews. 5. Police Chief: Meeting notes of interviews. 6. Park & Rec. Dir.: Meeting notes of interviews. 7. Utility Managers: Meeting notes of interviews. S. Motor Vehicle • Department: Meeting notes of interviews. 8. Motor Vehicle • Department: Meeting notes of interviews. 9. Downtown Coordinator: Meeting notes of interviews. 10. Planning Dept.: Meeting notes of interviews. 11. Building Insp.: Meeting notes of interviews. 12. General: Meeting notes of interviews. a. Meeting rooms b. Lunch areas C. Common areas 13. Economic Development Coordinator: Meeting notes of interviews. • 14. Housing Redevelopment Authority: Meeting notes of interviews. 15. Seniors: Meeting notes of interviews. 16. Council Members: Meeting notes of interviews. E. PROGRAMMATIC ISSUES 1. Summary of important issues to be addressed in the design of the project. 2. Consensus statement on needs current - future. 3. Relationship matrix and diagram. • • F. BUILDING CODE REVIEW 1. Detailed worksheet of restrictions, code classifications and allowances for the specific project. 2. A listing of any regulatory agencies or reports that may impact the project. 3. Zoning ordinances. G. SPACE ALLOCATION PROGRAM 1. Spread sheets of existing and proposed space requirements with 10 year and 20 year projections. 2. Comments directly related to specific areas such as relationship adjacencies and needs list. H. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS • 1. Analysis of City Hall space requirements in comparison to City Halls of similar size communities. PART II: SCHEMATIC DESIGN A. RENOVATION - Present the concept that best resolves the program through consensus building process. B. REPLACEMENT - Present the concept that best resolves the program through consensus building process. C. SPECIFICATIONS - Present an outline of the construction specification for both concepts. PART III: FINANCING A. COST ESTIMATES - Preliminary cost estimates of • both replacement and renovation concepts. B. FUNDING - Summary of funding possibilities according to results of program, concepts and maxi - audit. PART IV: RECOMMENDATIONS A. OPTIONS 1. Renovation: 2. Replacement: PROJECT - Recommendations regarding the renovation concept. Recommendations regarding the replacement concept. Recommendations regarding overall project. 0 (612) 587 -5151 f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON • 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 July 20, 1989 �O M E M O R A N D U M TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM GARY PLOTZ & Z SUBJECT REPORT ON RECRUITING CONSULTANTS - CITY ENGINEER Two firms were at the League of Cities Conference, namely Stewart Stein & Scott Ltd, and Sathe & Associates. Stewart Stein & Scott Ltd_ My contact was with Lenny Stein, principal and co- founder of the firm. The fee quoted is $13,500. After some conversation he offered $12,000. Once the candidate is on payroll there is no full or partial reimbursement if the candidate leaves. After more discussion, he would agree to a 3 month • guarantee after employment, that would amount to finding another candidate at no charge. This firm is new in the municipal field and has never recruited a municipal engineer; however, does have experience in the private sector. Bathe and Associates My contact was with Jim Brimeyer of their firm. Jim joined the firm in 1908 after being city manager in St. Louis Park, MN; Worthington, MN; Wooddale, IL and Park Ridge, IL. The fee quoted was $13,500. After some conversation he offered $12,000. His firm would guarantee a candidate would be employed for up to one year; if not, only a nominal charge of meals and travel would be charged to secure a new candidate. He offered an initial visit with the council at no charge. OTHER DEVELOPMENTS Doug Meier informed me that the City Engineer of Redwood Falls may be worthwhile checking into. He was not actively seeking another job. I personally called him (Ron Mannz) and sent him an application. We have received Ron Mannz's application, and it appears on paper he may be an excellent candidate. I would recommend we pursue this candidate, before • further consideration of hiring a consultant at these prices. We are also checking into a few other candidates. A total of 13 applications had been received by our closing date. • • 11 Biographies Terry W. Stein — Principal Terry Stein, a co- founder of Stewart, Stein and Scott, Ltd., brings more than 18 years of managerial and ex- ecutive assessment and selection experience to each client project. His experience includes four years in executive search and 14 years in senior human resource manage- ment. Terry's experience includes more than 10 years in the financial services industry. He's held several managerial positions with Norwest Corporation, includingthat of Staffing Manager for Norwest Minnea- polis and Director of Human Resources for Norwest Midland. In both organiza- tions he was part of the officer staff and served as a key member of the senior human resource management team. Terry later served as Vice President and Director of Human Resources for Twin City Federal, a multi - billion dollar finan- cial institution. He was responsible for the human resource function and served as a member of the organization's execu- tive staff. He played key roles in the man- agement of the organization through par- ticipation on the operating and strategic planning committees. He directed numer- ous vice presidential level searches as well as the search for a new chief operat- ing officer. Terry gained his manufacturing and la- bor relations management experience as Director of Human Resources and Labor Relations for the Cornelius Company. Following a highly successful corporate career, Terry entered human resource consulting in 1984, focusing his efforts on executive search. Capitalizing on his well - developed abilities to identify, assess and evaluate executive and managerial talenthas allowed him to effectively serve numerous organizations with critical staffing needs. Terry is an active volunteer and has par- ticipated in numerous community, civic and professional activities and organiza- tions, both as a member and in official leadership positions. Terry has a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from the University of Minne- sota. Bathe & Associates, Inc. `X EC U T I V SEARCH CONSU LTAN�ft In July, 1988 we were pleased to announce that Jim Brimeyer, former St. Louis Park City Manager, joined the firm of Bathe & Associate • Executive Search to become part of our professional staff and to expand the firm's public sector recruiting efforts. We thought it might be of interest to you to hear about Jim's achievements as a first year recruiter and to provide additional information about Bathe & Associates Executive Search. When Jim joined the firm of Bathe & Associates in July of 1988, after twenty years in public sector management positions in St. Louis Park, MN; Worthington, OH; Wooddale, IL; and Park Ridge, IL, his Business Plan called for spending 60% of his time in public sector recruiting, 40% with private sector firms and the remaining time would be spent with City Councils and Staff on team building, goal setting and strategic planning. These activities take place on a nationwide basis with emphasis on the upper Midwest was. The Rest year has shown significant results. Jim has been involved in the following searches and consulting activities: Public Sector City of Shorewood - Finance Director City of Cottage Grove - Comm. Devel. Dir. City of Roseville - City Manager* City of Oakdale - City Engineer -City of Lakeville - Chief of Police* City of Hastings - City Administrator* City of New Brighton - City Manager City of Cottage Grove - City Administrator •• City of Mankato - Ass't City Manager /Comm. Devel. Dir. Local Gov't Info. Systems - Exec. Director City of Lakeville - City Administrator* City of Shorewood - City Administrator City of Luverne - Coordinator of Utilities City of St. James - City Manager ** City of Brooklyn Park - City Manager' ** • = in conjuction with other SAI recruiters ee = in progress Private Sector /Non Profit Urban Concerns Workshop - Executive D Municipal Attorney - Popham, Haik* DBL Optical Labs - General Manager (California)* Production Manager' ** Marketing /Sales Director* Section Managers* ** Transportation Engineer - Westwood Pr Goal Setting /Team Buildine City of Falcon Heights City of Eagan Bennett, Ringroe, Wolefeld, Jarvis & Gardner Westwood Professional Services City of Shorewood City of Brooklyn Center City of Arden Hills City of Crystal Jim has a proven track record in the areas of employee development and creating an atmosphere that contributes to high quality job performance. He has developed an enviable reputation with his ability to identify the necessary ingredients that match the @kill of an individual with the needs of the organisation. Those skills and hie commitment to excellence can work for you and your organisation. Bathe & Associates Executive Search continues to be one of the premier search firms in the country. We conduct searches for companies and organisations in the following areas: Accounting /Finance Advertising Banking Data Processing Graphics /Printing Health Caro Human Resources Insurance Manufacturing Public Sector Real Estate Retail Engineering /Technical Legal Sales /Marketing When you consider hiring a search firm to assist you with your human resource needs, we want you to say: 'HIRE BATHE .� &ASSOCIATES EXECUTIVE SEARCH, THEY ARE THE BESTP 'J �DJ r h JPredent he Executive Search Consultant SUNSET RIDGE BUSINESS PARK • 5821 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 • 6121546 -2100 • FAX 6121546-6930 WORLD TRADE CENTER • 30 E. 7TH ST • SUITE 2260 • ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • 612/224 -7000 • FAX 6121223 -8079 yTrn-8g X °, x v— N�N•0 I /n.��� D M y m W r^ D VJ � n M < r N n S 8EL °$�_ O .N.go w °° z y �g52�0 cm � ✓� O1n�' n `ar m Jim has a proven track record in the areas of employee development and creating an atmosphere that contributes to high quality job performance. He has developed an enviable reputation with his ability to identify the necessary ingredients that match the @kill of an individual with the needs of the organisation. Those skills and hie commitment to excellence can work for you and your organisation. Bathe & Associates Executive Search continues to be one of the premier search firms in the country. We conduct searches for companies and organisations in the following areas: Accounting /Finance Advertising Banking Data Processing Graphics /Printing Health Caro Human Resources Insurance Manufacturing Public Sector Real Estate Retail Engineering /Technical Legal Sales /Marketing When you consider hiring a search firm to assist you with your human resource needs, we want you to say: 'HIRE BATHE .� &ASSOCIATES EXECUTIVE SEARCH, THEY ARE THE BESTP 'J �DJ r h JPredent he Executive Search Consultant SUNSET RIDGE BUSINESS PARK • 5821 CEDAR LAKE ROAD • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 • 6121546 -2100 • FAX 6121546-6930 WORLD TRADE CENTER • 30 E. 7TH ST • SUITE 2260 • ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • 612/224 -7000 • FAX 6121223 -8079 0 • MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 18, 1989 1. CALL TO ORDER OG� O'P The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, ElRoy Dobratz, Marlin Torgerson, Larry Roma and Chairman Craig. Members absent: Tom Lyke. Also present: Assistant Building Official Don Johaneson and Consulting Engineer Marlow Priebe. 2. MINUTES Mr. Romo made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, June 20, 1989. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. 3. OLD BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION TO BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS ON TRACT IN SECTION 1 LYNN TOWNSHIP OFF OF SOUTH GRADE RD. Ron and Evie Hansen commented on the letter they had received from City Attorney Barry Anderson regarding deferred assessments. Discussion followed on deferred assessments. City Attorney Anderson commented on the assessment concern and the SW storm sewer project. City Attorney Anderson suggested to proceed with annexation proceedings and provide a written agreement between Hansens and the City to defer the SW storm sewer assessment until the property is sold, a change in the property or until the present assessment is paid off. Mr. Hansen voiced concern over thedontirued use of the property as a gravel business that has been "grandfathered -in ". Discussion followed on zoning and "grandfathered -in" businesses in inappropriate zones. City Attorney Anderson asked to continue the proceedings until September to provide time for legal research. Assistant Building Official Don Johaneson will research the city ordinances. Mr. Torgerson moved to continue the matter until the September meeting, seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY ROBERT HORNICK "<_sistrr-" Building Official Johansen commented on the review of the revised site plan by City Staff. • Consulting City Engineer Marlow Priebe explained he has not completed his review of the plan. Discussion followed on the 20 recommendations of the memo dated July 5, 1989, by staff. Consulting Engineer Priebe commented on the need to continue the consideration. Mr. Bob Hornick, property owner, explained the problems with delaying the recommendation for another month. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7/18/89 Mr. Torgerson moved to recommend approval to City Council subject to the revised site plan satisfactorily meeting planning staff criteria . according to the staff memo of 7/5/89. Seconded by Mr. Romo the motion carried unanimously. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF REZONING BURGER KING PROPERTY FROM C -2 TO R -2 Attorney Pete Kasai commented on the Reeses position of the proposal presently before them. Mr. Romo moved to continue the hearing to the August meeting, seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING PROPERTY REQUESTED BY FAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH FROM R -2 TO C -3 Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:55 p.m. with the reading of publication 44012 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 6, 1989. The request is for the purpose o —co—ns-i-cTering a request by the owner to rezone property located at 4th Ave. SE and Hassan St. from R -2 (Residential district) to C -3 (Central Commercial district). Representatives from Faith Lutheran Church commented on the necessity of a bus garage close to the property line. Discussion followed of the surrounding zoning district. • Assistant Building Official Johaneson commented on staff recommending a minimum of 17' setback to Hassan St. Mr. Romo moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Torgerson the hearing closed at 8:00 p.m. Mr. Romo made a motion to recommend approval to City Council subject to a minimum of a 17' setback of the garage to Hassan St. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY NEIL JENSEN FOR A GARAGE ADDITION AT 518 2ND AVE SW Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:01 p.m. with the reading of publication #4013 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 6, 1989. The request is for the purpose of Coco sindering a conditional use permit to allow the owner to construct a new 22' x 24' garage over existing foundation on property located at 518 -2nd Ave. SW Consulting Engineer Priebe commented on the proposal to expand existing garage noting it must meet required side setbacks. Mr. Ebent asked to refrain from voting. Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Romo the i hearing closed at 8:05 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council subject to the recommendation of city 2 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MI14UTES 7/18/89 staff to expand the existing garage structure to 24' x 22', except the SW corner which should conform with the setback. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried with Mr. Ebent abstaining. (d) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF ANDERSON /BEELER ADDITION REQUESTED BY JUNE REDMA1I Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:06 p.m. with the reading of publication #4014 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, July 6, 1989. The request is for the purpose of considering the platting of a parcel of property to be known as Anderson /Beeler Addition. Consulting Engineer Priebe commented on the previous sketch plan presented. Ms. June Redman explained the sketch had 6 lots the plat is now 8 lots. Discussion followed as to the number and size of lots being large enough for single or twin homes. Mr. Levi Tupa, 522 Graham, stated he was not opposed to the proposal only of neighborhood dogs in the area. Mr. Harlow Stillings commented on having 16 units with a cul -de -sac. Mr. Torgerson suggested an increase of greenspace with 8 duplexes as opposed to 16 single units. Ms. Redman stated there would be 2 lots already sold as single family dwellings if the plat were approved. Mr. Roger Reinhart, 545 Larson, stated he had no problem with the proposal and commented on the benifit to the area. Mr. Wayne Scott, 525 Larson, commented on the cul -de -sac exit to Roberts Rd. Assistant Building Official Johaneson explained this would be a R -2 (b) zone, requiring an 8' side yard setback. Mr. Ebent stated a neighboring property owner was opposed to the cul- de -sac. Mr. Scott questioned the R -2(b) zoning. Consulting Engineer Priebe explained the reasons for the 8' setback. Mr. Torgerson moved to closed the hearing, seconded by Mr. Romo the hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. Mr. Torgerson made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Roma the motion carried unanimously. (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY CITY STAFF TO REZONE PROPERTY ON WATER ST. • Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:21 p.m. with the reading of publication #4015 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday July 6, 1989. The request is for the purpose of considering a request 93 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7/18/89 by City.Staff to rezone property located on Water St. from R -5 (Mobile Home Park) back to R -2 (Multiple family residence). City Attorney Barry Anderson commented on the recommendation to is rezone. Mr. Torgerson moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Roma the hearing closed at 8:23 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommed approval of rezoning the property from R -5 to R -2. Seconded by Mr. Torgerson the motion carried unanimously. (f) CONSIDERATION OF AMMENDMENT ADDITION TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING BED AND BREAKFAST ESTABLISHMENTS The public hearing was withdrawn but discussion took place on the proposed Bed and Breakfast on Adams St. Ms. Linda Heaton, 307 Dale, stated she is the prospective owner of 231 Adams St. Mr. Torgerson stated he is not opposed to the Bed and Breakfast but the city needs an ordinance for such establishments. He explained the Heatons would like to serve meals also, but that there then is a problem with the R -2 zoning. City Attorney Anderson addressed the proposal for a gourmet restaurant. He stated a Bed and Breakfast would not pose a problem but a restaurant included would not be consistent with the same guidelines. He suggested a conditional use permit for the restaurant site to be included. Consulting Engineer Priebe questioned what the use would be, as a Bed and Breakfast, a restaurant or both. Ms. Heaton stated both would be in one establishment. She explained a Bed and Breakfast Inn would provide more services. City Attorney Anderson stated opposition to an Inn in the R -2 zone. Ms. Heaton explained the service would be by reservation only with a 20 person seating capacity. Discussion followed on the Bed and Breakfast or the Inn. City Attorney Anderson commented on the zoning requirements for eating establishments and suggested a public hearing on the restaurant issue. Ms. Heaton explained the location is appropriate. Discussion followed on the option of rezoning the area. Ms. Heaton explained neighboring property owners seem to be agreeable to the proposal. Assistant Building Official Johaneson suggested rezoning to C -3 to meet the requirements. Discussion followed on the parking requirements and ample parking access from the alley or Adams St. The Planning Commission directed staff to set a public hearing for August 15, 1989 to rezone from R -2 to C -3. 5. ADJOURMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. •DAVID E. ARNOLD CHARLES R. GAR H. CAR MIGHAEL GARY D. M-DOWELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON G. BARRY ANDERSON STEVEN S. HOGE LAURA K. FRETLAND DAVID A. ERUEGGEMANN JOSEPH M. PAIRMENT JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICHARD G. M.GEE July 20, 1989 ARNOLD & MODOwELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 101 PARK PLACE HUTOHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (012)587 -7575 TELECOPIER(612) 587 -4096 Mr. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 RESIDENT ATTORNEY 0. BARRY ANDERSON OF GOI\'SEL WILLIAM W. CAMERON PAUL D. DOVE 5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 (612)545.8000 MN TOLL FREE 600-343 -4545 TELECOPIER (612) 545 -1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETOtO' AIFSESOTA 55371 (612�y9 -2214 TELECOPIER0.2)3d9 -5506 I O °A Re: Baumetz, et al. vs. City of Hutchinson Our File No. 3244 -88 -0020 District Court File Nos. 21489, 490, 491 and 492 Dear Gary: Please be advised that the above referenced matter has been set for trial on October 24, 1989 commencing at 9:00 o'clock a.m. Please advise the Council of the trial date. Best personal regards. Very truly yours, �RNOLD & McDOWELL G. Barry Anderson GBA:lm June 1989 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM Treasurer's Report Carol Conradi, Treasurer BUDGET INCOME BUDGET INCOME MTD YTD BUDGET opalance $124,560.36 $125,373.26 FOR YOUR INFORMATIO( Receipts: Basic State /Federal Aid 62,485.00 256,000.00 Big Stone County 5,522.25 16,566.75 22,089.00 *Chippewa County 36,922.50 *73,845.00 Kandiyohi County 53,069.00 106,138.00 McLeod County 35,145.00 70,290.00 Meeker County 32,611.00 65,222.00 Swift County 17,280.00 34,560.00 Appleton 4,675.00 9,305.00 Benson 9,304.50 18,609.00 Glencoe 12,856.00 25,712.00 Graceville 1,937.50 3,875.00 Hutchinson 28,070.50 56,141.00 Kerkhoven 1,994.00 3,988.00 Litchfield 19,987.50 39,975.00 Ortonville 6,394.00 12,788.00 Willmar 43,420.00 86,840.00 Bird Island 3,544.50 7,089.00 *Dawson 4,911.00 * 9,822.00 Hector 3,234.50 6,469.00 • *Madison 5,714.50 *11,429.00 Renville 3,857.00 7,714.00 Cash Receipts & Sales Tax 3,222.81 22,581.92 49,500.00 Gifts 200.00 3,227.95 2,000.00 Interest 1,043.35 3,531.34 8,000.00 Reimbursements (local govt) *Chippewa County *Dawson *Madison Benson (materials only) Chippewa Co. (materials only) Montevideo (materials only) Other Reimbursements Other Total Receipts Other Funds Glencoe Fund KCWL Family Ties Fund Large Print Fund TOTAL RECEIPTS & BALANCE: 565.43 10,553.84 506.00 $135,620.20 Page 1 16,014.00 2,736.00 1,750.00 1,500.00 20,000.00 2,000.00 4,131.24 481,452.20 1,506.00 6,800.00 2,615.00 $617,746.46 (OVER) *32,028.00 * 5,472.00 * 3,500.00 2,048.00 18,234.00 12,000.00 5,931.00 1,066,613.00 1,532.38 3,292.00 9,100.00 2,615.00 $1,083,152.38 June 1989 PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM TREASURER'S REPORT (CONTINUES EXPENDITURES: YT) Y OF EXP CURRENT EAPcNu1TORES _ EXPcNuITUR£5- TO SST uUJGcT ACCT :RO �i... .UC .00 .J9• .J"• LIRRARY _._...__. ._... _ _ PERSONAL SFAVICcS SALARIES AND WA(AS_ 56.3'11.92 333.467.19 49.274 67o.82J.J0 McALTn lk!SURARCc _ 1,165.59 d.144.05 3o.794 21,)C U. JO Mc A,Th INSURANCE USu UCTIRLE 47'.J9 1,9C3.J2 63.434 u.000.(,0 R T I R_MCh1 1NAV ANCc_ - - - 5.3.`0.20 319o99.09 52.1)4 `4.240.6° - ACCT _ ,KOUP... 63.504.60 375...03.95 49.j046 76 1,36U.0) MATERIALS BOOKS - AJULT V. 04 o.97 36.720.44 48.40t 8�•JOU.00 BOOKS - CNILOREN - _ _ _ 357.v8 '' 11.52[.57 57.o1Z 2J w OJ w0 GCNERAL PcFtRENCE 304.o3 6.:69.78 54.754 1.'•000.J0 PtAlOUICA'S 373.13 3.175.10 15.124 2" UOJ.J^ _ _ PAMPHLETS _ .LO 108.17 36.J64 30u.CC BENSON LIu RARY MATERIALS 53.20 L.o7d.Z6 91.954 2.048.00 CMIPPEWA COUNTY LIBRARY MAT --P!ALS -- - 133.37 16,422.39 1CL.437, 18.234. JJ -- MuPITE Vl OFJ MATERIALa -- -- l ?3.74" _ 12u.74 _ 1.�34 -- 12.JOO.vO 8M4 C lbMA FI'M3 59J.J0 " 39J..l0 61.49t x'903.00 VIDEO DISCS L TAPS_ 56.20 i.473.91 51.544 4, dO0.J) AUD3C OIS,S A-,0 TAP25 .00 122.14 61.474 200.1) SLIOFS ANU FILM STRIPS .01) .00 .,)Qt 250.4c MIC ROf3RMS .00 .00 .00Z 2[0.07 .OD _ t90.12 71.504 950.00 ACCT GROUP... 11.114..2 85•s86.02 44.39: 175.38Z.J0 CATALQG.NU _ OCLC ANJ OTHEN CHAR„ -S .JO 6.549.95 47.504 16.000.0^ CUM VENDOR CHAPOES 251.17 9.7[6.59 76.604 1.•671.00 ACCT GROUP... 258.47 15.256.54 59.524 34.071.60 VEMICLFa - - -- OPEAATI04 AN? MAINTLNANCE 991.0° 5.d69.41 39.134 la•OOO.JO _lhSUPA9CF n .00 2.616.31 174.424 1,500.00 _ __._ "_ "_,_ __ - AMOAT I2 AT I ON _ .J3 23.u91.45 077.444 4.006.0C ACCT GROUP... 901.05 31.567.67 153.994 2U•5 OJ .0 CO MMUNSC �710N TcLiPHGN_ AND LIN_ C -APyES - - -� -- -- .91.41 4.c5d.24 50.0: 0.500.00" TERMI..AL MAI4IFNA4C2 .00 55 u.00 55.U06 1.000.0^ _ _PJ�TA65_A:v O. SMIPP,NL - - -- 3.17.52 4.11:.67 Sa.49: a.4O .0^ ACCT ;R7LP... l902o.53 9.726.91 54.314 17,900.JO EbUIPMFNT _NEN Egt IP.YENT -- - -- - .JD 2•.91.35 114.024 2.000.00 A/V EwULPFiSAT - .UO oc" 1.59 93.084 700.00 MAINTENENLE A::O CL4TRACTS 193'0.7? 8.600.01 73.434 IZ.00V.0 " . -- - - -1 - -- ^CLT rR'1UP... 1.1'6.7b 11.747.94 77.924 14,704.40 OTacR CUSTDutAL SUPPLIES A40 EJUIPMt NT 4aw2 9[1.54 90.054 1.000.00 _ _SUPPLIES AND PRINTING 1.615.05 lu.r75.17 54.694 20.000.0C PRCMOTI.4AL A,.O PRJORAMMING .uc o2a.Z) 121,.:446 iOD.c^ M1LcAUE AM MEETINGS - STAFF 0,?.U9 L.9 ?3.94 9_.19: 39500.,)0 MILcAGS A..) MEETINGi TRuSTE:S 321.34 1..9x.•7 4J.30% o.ZDU.00 PROF. ME- uEKSHIPS 7TRUSTEES) .00 3 ^0.00 70.33: 400...O --- ,hSu AaNCE - - - - -- "- _ - " - -- .J0 9.tPo.00 107.024 ,.400.0) AUS AN) Lt GAL NOTICES- 90.54 119.34 112.344 LOO.0C AUDITING .UO 1.500.00 125.40. 1,206.00 225.00 - L.cCJ.a9 53.364 3.)00.0) CuNTINUIN., tOUCATION .UO lc.O.u'J 30.03. 500.0 - ACLT GROUP... 3.173.94 30,JB3.15 57.754 Ay.400.40 - -- S PfCIAL GLENCJo_ FRIENDS, 1983 .JO .00 .004 1.532.09 KCML_ _ _. 200.13 450.18 25.41. i,T8a.v0 LOCAL - tJUlPM_ 4NT .CC '' 19,..50 .JM4 .00 AUTU"ATICty FU,40 WICAL1 .J) .00 .4)4 .0) _ _5T4TE SAL_S_T4x 134.30 1.011.27 67.424 1•POO.JO _ __ FA41LY TT:S FUND _ 139.00 119.10 1.534 9,100.00 LARGE PRINT FUND 5)5.43 505.43 19.33: Z•615.J0 - - -" . _ ACCT GA ^.UP... 977.Z1 2,4eo.08 13.134 lc•533.39 URG. TOTAL... _ 82.727.2C 564.053.46 _ 52.224 1.081,646.19 ENDING CASH • BALANCE $52,893.00 $52,893.00 Page 2 ARNOLD & MGDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAw DAVID B.ARNOLD 5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD OFCOVUSEL CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416-1492 WILLIAM W. CAMERON GARY D. MCDOWELL PAUL D.DOVE STEVEN A. ANDERSON (612) 545 -9000 O. BARRY ANDERSON MN TOLL FREE 600-343-4545 STEVEN S. HOGE 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET LAURA K. FRETLAND GABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55391 (612)389 -2214 DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN TELECOPIER (612) 545 -1]03 TELECOPIER (012) 369 -5506 JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT ` JAMES UTLEY _ \,� 101 PARK PLACE JULIA A. CHRISTIANS f HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 q RICHARD O. M,GEE (\ �\ (612) 567 -7575 F �( TELECOPIER (612) 587 -4096 July 20, 1989 11 ) Mr. Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 Re: City of Hutchinson Pool Ordinance Our File No. 3188 -87 -0001 Dear Gary: As you may know, our office was contacted by Diane Pasco regarding the possibility of a revision to existing ordinances, with a specific thought in mind of addressing the prevention of swimming pool accidents within the City of Hutchinson. I believe there may have been contact with either your office or other council members as well. Therefore, I would appreciate it if you would include this letter in the city council packet as a "for your information" item. We conferred by telephone with Diane on July 17, 1989, and have now started to pull together copies of model ordinances from other municipalities. We are working on a model ordinance and I would hope to have some language before the city council for reaction and comment at the first meeting in August. As you may be aware, concern has been expressed over above - ground outdoor pools and the issue of whether or not those outdoor pools should be fenced or other protective devices used. There is also the related question of the applicability of any new ordinance to existing structures and we will address that issue as well at the time the matter is presented to the city council. If you have questions or problems in connection with any of the foregoing, you certainly should feel free to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, • ARNOLCj ^, & M DOW )LL G. Barr ; h�de 1so GBA:r f CC: Diane Pasco • • -4 - Lql lij 0 League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612)227.5600(FAX:221.0986) (\�- 1 - > 4 -�l 19 July, 1989 Gary Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Avenue West �� \ Hutchinson, MN 55350 y Dear Mr. Plotz; Peter Tritz referred your inquiry regarding fencing of swimming pools to me for research. You asked three questions: a. Are there any federal or state codes requiring fencing (1) above ground (2) below ground pools? There are no federal codes that we are aware of that require fencing of swimming pools. There is a Minnesota Health Department rule (attached) that requires minimal fencing around public pools. b. Does Minneapolis, St. Paul, or any of the suburbs, also outstate communities, have additional regulations (beyond federal or state regulations)? Yes. Most communities have fencing requirements for swimming pools. c. Would your Computer Management Information System be able to find our community any sample ordinances? Yes. Several ordinances are enclosed. Most of the ordinances are very similar, so I stopped at eight since they began to be repetitive. I hope that the child involved in the accident in your town has recovered and is well. I believe that with these ordinances to help You, you will be able to move quickly to pass a fencing ordinance and hopefully prevent this sort of accident in the future. If I can be of any more assistance please call or write. Sincerely, �� Heather Brown Thayer Research Assistant 0 CALL TO ORDER LETTING NO. 5 PUBLIC HEARING WEDNESDAY, JULY 26, 1989 7:00 P.M. at Jr. /Sr. High School Auditorium 1. Assessment Roll No. 252 - Bluff Street 2. Assessment Roll No. 253 - Waller Drive 3. Assessment Roll No. 254 - Carlisle Street Action: Motion to close hearing(s) - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Roll(s) and award contract for Letting No. 5 - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions ADJOURNMENT r 1 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY, JULY 11TH9 1989. • NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PUBLICATION NO. 4016 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 252 - LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 89 -15 S.A.P. 43- 607 -07 S.A.P. 133 - 104 -03 S.A.P. 133 - 112 -02 S.A.P. 133 - 121 -01 Hutchinson, Minnesota July 7th, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 26th day of July, 1989, in the Hutchinson Jr. /Sr. High School Auditorium at 1200 Roberts Road, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Bluff Street from T.H. 7 to 2,600' North by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Retaining Wall, Bituminous Surfacing; and Appurtenances; improvement of the Drainage Area Adjacent to Bluff Street from the South Fork of the Crow River to 2,600' North: of T.H.'7 by the Construction of Storm Sewer Lines, Manholes, Catch Basins, Lead Lines, and Appurtenances; and Improvement of Certain Areas of Bluff Street, as needed, by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer Mains, Watermains, and Appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the - entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1989. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued,to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1989. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 361,400.00. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 1. Publication No. 4016 Page 2 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the - objector may call • witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of -the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within-ten bays after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. •r, Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council -may; in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or-older-for whom it • would be a hardship to make the payments. when deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason- provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the vesolution- adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form•for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. h7 Gary D. Plot ,-City X#ministrator City of Hutchinson; Minnesota r -- PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TU9SDAY9 JULY 11TH, 1989. • NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PUBLICATION NO. 4017 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 253 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 89 -15 Hutchinson, Minnesota July 7th, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 26th day of July, 1989, in the Hutchinson Jr. /Sr. High School Auditorium at 1200 Roberts Road, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Waller Drive by the construction of Bitumlinous Surfacing and Appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the ,assessment to the County- Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator.- No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1989. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment befgre the date given above, the rate of • interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1989. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 7.200.00 Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with . the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 1 Publication No. 4017 Page 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. when deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason - provided -in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the 'City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. • Gary D. P otz; Cqy Administrator . City of Hutchinso , Minnesota 4 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY, JULY 11TH, 1989. • NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT PUBLICATION•NO. 4018 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 254 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT N0. 89 -15 Hutchinson, Minnesota July 7th, 1989 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 26th day of July, 1989, in the Hutchinson Jr. /Sr. High School Auditorium at 1200 Roberts Road, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of Carlisle Street Area by the construction of Storm Sewer Line, Catch Basins, Lead Lines, and Appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1989. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year -in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you • decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1989. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 8,250.00 Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same • procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4' • Publication No. 4018 Page 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years 'of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and'the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. Gary�zty Administrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota 0 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 253 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER FRONT FOOT - WALLERS $ 14.38 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS SURFACING & APPURTENANCES COST PER LOT - WALLERS 2ND 432.87 COMPUTED BY: Marlow V. Priebe WALLER DRIVE NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER 01 31- 117 -29 -09 -0145 Floyd A Mae Hoel 1390 Roberts Road 23- 097 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 L 02 31- 117 -29 -09 -0144 Robert & Barbara Hoel c/o Floyd & Mae Hoel 1390 Roberts Road 23-097 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 03 31- 117 -29 -09 -0143 Bruce Rahn 625 Waller Dr. 23- 097 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 04 31- 117 -29 -09 -0142 Paul Betker 410 School Road No. 23- 097 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 05 31- 117 -29 -09 -0141 Sidney & Geraldine Grams 645 Waller Dr. i 23 -097 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 06 31- 117 -29 -09 -0130 John & Brenda Beckman 667 Bluff St. 1 23- 096 -0160 Hutchinson, MN 55350 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. West Hutchinson, MN 55350 TOTAL WALLER DRIVE SURFACING UNIT USED: F.F. /PER LOT LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT Waller's 2nd Subd. 5 1 1 $ 432.8T Waller's 2nd Subd. 4 1 1 Waller's 2nd Subd. 3 1 1 Waller's 2nd Subd. 2 1 1 Waller's 2nd Subd. 1 1 1 80.42' x 109.40' EX S3.39' of Lot A & Lot 3, Waller's Subd. 2 64.82 360.58 $ 432.87 $ 432.87 $ 432.87 $ 432.87 DEFERRED $ 932.11 $ 5,185.14 $ 8,281.60 ,2, ASSESSMENT ROLL N0. 254 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. COMPUTED BY: Marlow V. CHECKED BY: Cal Rice LETTING N0. 5, PROJECT N0. 89 -15 Priebe CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER LINE, CATCH BASINS, Priebe LEAD LINES & APPURTENANCES IN THE CARLISLE STREET AREA COST PER UNIT: SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: UNIT USED: $ 0.05 10 SQUARE FOOT 1 ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 31- 117 -29 -10 -0830 Marlin C. & Ada Schauer 594 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0160 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 1 3 7587 $ 379.35 02 31- 117 -29 -10 -0840 Scott & Debra Haapala 541 Carlisle St. ' 23- 086 -0170 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 2 3 7496 $ 374.80 03 31- 117 -29 -10 -0850 Steven & Debra Fitzlof£ 574 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0180 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's let Addition 3 3 7405 $ 370.25 04 31- 117 -29 -10 -0860 Robert & Carolyn Lambert 564 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0190 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 4 3 7314 $ 365.70 05 31- 117 -29 -10 -0870 James & Marlene Nielsen 544 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0200 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 5 3 7223 $ 361.15 06 31- 117 -29 -10 -0112 Michael & Lynn Schuetze 544 Carlisle St. 23- 056 -0490 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N75' of Lot 8, N 1/2 City 4 8393 $ 419.65 07 31- 117 -29 -10 -0113 Burnell & Tammy Sell 540 Carlisle St. 23 -056 -0495 Hutchinson, MN 55350 S75' of N150' Lot 8, N1 12 City 4 8240 $ 412.00 ' 08 31- 117 -29 -10 -0151 Mark & Luann Linder 541 Carlisle St. 23 -056 -0540 Hutchinson, MN 55350 875' of N150' Lot 9, N1/2 City 4 8873 $ 443.65 09 31- 117 -29 -10 -0152 Deane Dietel, Etal 845 -2nd Ave. S.E. 23- 056 -0550 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N75' of Lot 9, N 1/2 City 4 8393 $ 419.65 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 254 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 T. Puchalski & D. Plath COST PER UNIT: $ 0.05 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER LINE, CATCH BASINS, SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: Marlow V. Priebe LEAD LINES & APPURTENANCES NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice IN THE CARLISLE STREET AREA UNIT USED: SQUARE FOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 10 31- 117 -29 -09 -0970 T. Puchalski & D. Plath 555 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 6 2 7223 $ 361.15 11 31- 117 -29 -09 -0980 Laurel Vasko 565 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 7 2 7314 $ 365.70 12 31- 117 -29 -09 -0990 Mark & Michelle Jaskowiak 575 Carlisle St. 23 -o86 -0130 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 8 2 7405 $ 370.25 13 31- 117 -29 -09 -1000 Charles & Harriet Burich 583 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0140 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's tat Addition 9 2 7496 $ 374.80 14 31- 117 -29 -09 -1010 Sylvia Mielke 593 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 13t Addition 10 2 7587 $ 379.35 TOTAL CARLISLE .STREET STORM SEWER $ 5,397.45 ASSESSMEN44110LL NO. 252 COMISL I U 8,:, Ma�V. Priebe COMPUTED BYt Ma V. Priebe CHECKED BY: Ca e LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: $ 0.05 STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD LI&L3 6 APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEAD: NO. IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STREE THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: NO. FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOR T T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUARE 0 ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 31- 117 -29 -16 -0170 Larry A Barbara Sorenson 305 Bluff St. Part of Lots 3 -4 -5 -6 23- 056 -1990 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 18 17010 $ 850.50 02 31- 117 -29 -16 -0010 John Horrocks 710 Shady Ridge Road 23- 056 -1780 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 15 44583 $ 2,229.15 03 31- 117 -29 -16 -0020 Dale A Betty Beightol 200 Park Ave. Part of Lots 2 A 3 23 -056 -1790 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 15 55080 $ 2,754.00 04 31- 117 -29 -16 -0030 Eileen Roldt' ' 246 Park Ave. Part of Lot 9 23- 056 -1850 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 15781 $ 789.05 05 31- 117 -29 -16 -0040 Bruce M. A Gladys LSckfelt 237 -4th Ave. N.E. Part of Lot 9 23- 056 -1860 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 15 23250 $ 1,162.50 06 31- 117 -29 -16 -0050 James A Roxanne Lauer 250 Gauger St. West 88' of Lot 10, 23 -056 -1870 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 15 26136 $ 1,306.80 07 31- 117 - 29-16 -0070 Thomas A Debra Wiprud 257 Gauger St. W48' Lot 11 A Lot 10 Ex. W881, 23- 056 -1880 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 26804 $ 1,340.20 08 31- 117 -29 -16 -0080 Barclay Properties 130 Park Ave. S., Suite 101 P.O. Box 1243 E80.4' of Lot 11, 23- 056 -1890 St. Cloud, MN 56302 N 112 City 15 23879 $ 1,193.95 09 31- 117-29 -16 -0090 Barclay Properties 130 Park Ave. So., Suite 101 P.O. Box 1243 5147' of Lot 12, 23- 056 -1910 St. Cloud, MN 56302 N 1/2 City 15 19094 E 954.70 10 31- 117 -29 -16 -0100 Minnie E. Albrecht 428 High St. Lot 12 EX S1471, 23 -056 -1900 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 15 19937 $ 996.85 J. i 6 • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 252 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: $ 0.05 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe STORM SEVER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD LINES A APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: Marlow V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STREET FROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Cal Rice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NORTH OF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUARE FOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 11 31- 117 -29 -16 -0110 Carol Briggs 510 Larson St. N142.2' of Lots 1 A 2, 23- 056 -1920 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 16 7963 $ 398.15 12 31- 117 -29 -16 -0121 Mark A Cynthia Fratzke 436 Monroe St. N64' of 5124' of N266.2' of 23- 056 -1930 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Lots 1 A 2, N 1/2 City 16 3584 $ 179.20 13 31- 117 -29 -16 -0122 Marvin Willhite 465 High St. S60' of N266.2' of Lots 1 A 2, 23- 056 -1940 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 16 3540 $ 177.00 14 31- 11T -29 -16 -0130 Investors Real Estate Trust Lots 1 A 2 EX RR A EX N266.2' 12 Main St. So. A N'ly 116' of Lots 3 -4 -5 EX 23- 056 -1950 Minot, RD 58701 RR, N 1/2 City 16 13209 $ 660.45 15 31- 11T -29 -16 -0140 Valley Vista - LTD Partnership Lots 3 -4 -5 EX N'ly 110' A EX 1111 Third Ave. S. #340 RR A All of Lot 6 EX RR, 23- 056 -1960 Minneapolis, MN 55404 N 112 City 16 25520 f 1,276.00 16 31- 117 -29- 09-1150 Wesley E. A N. V. Mattkins 455 Bluff St. Lot 6 EX N156.7' A EX T.N. 7, 23- 056 -1830 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 22013 $ 1,100.65 1T 31- 117 -29 -09 -1140 C. Anderson A J. Calendar 465 Bluff St. 661 S of N90.7' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -1840 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 9193 $ 459.65 18 31- 117 -29 -09 -1130 Rodney A Tammy Kirchoff 206 -5th Ave. N.E. N90.'t� of Lot 6, 23- 056 -1820 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 12778 $ 638.90 19 31- 117 -29 -09 -1120 Robert E. A Shirley Bowen 216 -5th Ave. N.E. Lot 5 Ex N132' of E132' A EX 23- 056 -1800 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hwy., N 1/2 City 15 14025 $ 701.25 20 31- 117 -29 -09 -1100 Norman E. A Eva C. Bowen 218 -5th Ave. N.E. N132' x 132' of Lot 5, 23- 056 -1810 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 17424 $ 871.20 q ASJ. -ILAI HULL NU. L}L LEll1N0 NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: $ 0.05 - COMPILED BYS low V. COMPUTED BY: w V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF LEA ES A APPURTENANCES ST ROM THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: ice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUARROOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 21 31- 117 -29 -09 -1090 Ronald A Pauline Instal 193 Park Ave. Part of Lots 11 A 12 EX T.H. 7 23- 056 -1760 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 5280 $ 264.00 22 31- 117 -29 -09 -1080 Jeffrey A Mary Horrocks 456 Bluff St. E120' of S66' of Lot 1, 23 -056 -1610 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 7920 $ 396.00 23 31- 117 -29 -09 -1070 Gary A. A Patricia Clyne 466 Bluff St. N70' of 5136' of Lot 1, 23-056 -1620 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 8400 $ 420.00 24 31- 117 -29 -09 -1060 Sumiko Nelson 476 Bluff St. N62' of S198' of Lot 1, 23- 0561630 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 14 7440 E 372.00 25 31- 117 -29 -09 -1050 Raymond A Luella Ness 480 Bluff St. 66' x 120' of Lot 1 S. of N66' 23- 056 -1640 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 7920 $ 396.00 26 31- 117 -29 -09 -1040 Carol Roach 194 -5th Ave. N.E. N66' of E120' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -1650 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 14 7920 $ 396.00 27 31- 117 -29 -09 -1030 James A Heather Heilein 481 Clark St. 66' S of N66' of Lot 2, 23- 056 -1670 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 9217 $ 460.85 28 31- 117 -29 -09 -1020 Eileen Friauf 154 -5th Ave. N.E. 66' x 111.8' In NE Cor. Lot 2, 23- 056 -1660 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 7379 E 368.95 29 31- 117 -29 -09 -0960 Vernon A Ruth Hagen 554 Clark St. 23- 086 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Add. 5 2 7223 $ 361.15 30 31- 117 -29 -09 -0950 Eugene A Linda Wiedenroth 564 Clark St. 23- 086 -0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Add. 4 2 7314 $ 365.70 ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER , Nu. ,,- P, coIir i,tH UNl'rt $ 0.05 COMPILED BYt Marlow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD LINES 6 APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEADt TOTAL COMPUTED BYt ow V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF ST FROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: Rice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' N *OF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUA T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 31 31- 117 -29 -09 -0940 Eric A Genise Quest 574 Clark St. 23- 086 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's tat Add. 3 2 7405 E 370.25 32 31- 117 -29 -09 -0930 Floyd A Charlotte Taylor 584 Clark St. 23- 086 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's tat Add. 2 2 7496 374.80 33 31- 117 -29 -09 -0920 Connie J. Karl 596 Clark St. 23- 086 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's let Add. 1 2 7587 E 379.35 34 31- 117 -29- 09-0910 Mildred Hakes A Leona Janke c/o Helen Kaddatz 595 Clark St. 23- 086 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's let Add. 10 1 7587 $ 379.35 35 31- 117 -29 -09 -0900 Mabel Falling 585 Clark St. 23- 086 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's let Add. 9 1 7496 E 374.80 36 31- 117 -29 -09 -0890 K. Mortenson A B. Swenson 575 Clark St. 23- 086 -0030 Hutchinson Miller's let Add. 8 1 7405 E 370.25 37 31- 117 -29 -09 -0880 Lorall A Anita Dallman 565 Clark St. 23- 086 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Add. 7 1 7314 E 365.70 38 31- 117 -29 -09 -0870 Brian Dobberstein 555 Clark St. 23- 086 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's let Add. 6 1 7223 $ 361.15 39 31- 117 -29 -09 -0860 Daniel A Deann Brinkman Lot 4 E% N44' A Lot 5, Brigg's 149 -5th Ave. N.E. Rearrg. of Lot 10, 23- 061 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 9075 $ 453.75 40 31- 117 -29 -09 -0850 Timothy A Carol Wakefield S11' of Lot 3 A N44' of Lot 4 514 Clark St. of Brigg's Rearrg. of Lot 10, 23- 061 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 5750 $ 287.50 IIULI. 14U. [ LEI "I ING NU. S, PNOJEG'f NO. 139 -15 CUSI PEN ONIT: 41 0.05 COMPILED BY: low V. Priebe COMPUTED 6Y: w V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEA NES A APPURTENANCES IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF ST ROM THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: ice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUAT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 41 31- 117 -29 -09 -0840 Daniel P. Carrigan 524 Clark St. Lot 3 EX S111, Brigg's Rearrg. 23-061 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 of Lot 10, N 1/2 City 4 5809 $ 290.45 42 31- 117 -29 -09 -0830 Donald A Mavis Rasmussen 534 Clark St. Lot 2 of Briggs Rearrg. of 23- 061 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Lot 10, N 1/2 City 4 7049 $ 352.45 43 31- 117 - 29-09 -0820 Dorothy Christensen 544 Clark St. Lot 1 of Brigg's Rearrg. of 23- 061 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Lot 10, N 112 City 4 7135 E 356.75 44 31- 117 -29- 09-0810 Ruth Bahr 545 Clark St. 23 -084 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Briggs Addition, N 112 City 10 4 7135 $ 356.75 45 31 -117 -29-09 -0800 Terry A Faith Christensen 535 Clark St. 23 -084 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 1/2 City 9 4 7050 $ 352.50 46 31- 117 - 29-09 -0790 Wesley A Harriet Anderson 153 -5th Ave. N.E. Lots 6 -7 -8, 23- 084 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 112 City 4 20632 $ 1,031.60 47 31 -117- 29-09 -0780 Janet McGee 173-5th Ave. N.E. 23 -084 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 1/2 City 5 4 9012 $ 450.60 48 31- 117 -29 -09 -0770 Thomas A Pamela Ertl 504 Bluff St. Lot 4 Ex N3', 23 -084 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 1/2 City 4 8805 $ 440.25 49 31- 117 -29 -09 -0760 Patrick A Marlyce Fistman 17820 Co. Rd. G. Lot 3 A N3' Lot 4, 23 -084 -0030 Plymouth, MN 55447 Brigg's Addition, N 112 City 4 9627 $ 481.35 50 31- 117 - 29-09 -0750 Fred G. A Olga J. Kern 534 Bluff St. 23 -084 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 112 City 2 4 9400 $ 470.00 r ._.. ._., .._.. .......... ..... „ .., -,, w.,. 1'6u uNlll 3 0.05 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD LINES A APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEAD: COMPUTED BY: V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: CHECKED BY: W ice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOFW T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SOUAR O0 T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 51 31- 117 -29 -09 -0740 Lillian Zajicek 544 Bluff St. 23- 084 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg's Addition, N 112 City 1 4 9379 E 468.95 52 31- 117 -29 -09 -0730 Randy A Mary Anderson 566 Bluff St. 5132' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0380 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 20003 S 1,000.15 53 31- 117 -29 -09 -0720 W. F. A Velma Phillips 576 Bluff St. Center 66' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0370 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 10134 $ 506.70 54 31- 117 -29 -09 -0710 Diane Rupp , c/o Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 W. Highland Park Dr. 66' S. of N66' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0360 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 10223 E 511.15 55 31- 117 -29 -09 -0700 Elsie Orr A Jewell Orr 596 Bluff St. N66' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0350 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 10312 $ 515.60 56 31- 117 -29 -09 -0690 Peter M. A Linda Harkins 237 -5th Ave. N.E. Lot 10 EX W 1 Rod, 23- 056 -0340 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 43431 $ 2,171.55 57 31- 117 -29 -09 -0680 James R. Slyter 565 Peterson Circle E 112 Lot 9 6 W 1 Rod Lot 10, 23- 056 -0330 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 29810 $ 1,490.50 58 31- 117 -29 -09 -0661 Bruce A Patricia Block 560 Peterson Circle x75' of Lot 8 EX W661, 23- 056 -0300 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 6287 3 314.35 59 31- 117 -29 -09 -0670 0. H. A Minna H. Schenk 221 -5th Ave. N.B. E60' of 5132' of W 112 Lot 9, 23 -056 -0320 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 7920 $ 396.00 60 31- 117 -29 -09 -0660 James R. Slyter 565 Peterson Circle N75' of W 112 Lot 9, 23- 056 -0310 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 5612 $ 280.60 A 39.795.45 AJJSJJMLNT HULL Nu. 252 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: 0.05 GOMPILED BY: rlow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEA NES A APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEAD: NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER COMPUTED BY: wow V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF ST�FROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: - 10 CHECKED BY: Rice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NO OF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUA T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY FID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 61 31 -117 -29-09 -0650 Lowell D. Otto 8125' of N200' of L8 EX W66' Rt. 1, Box 281 A 5125' of N200' of W 1/2 L9, 23- 056 -0280 Silver Lake, MN 55381 N 112 City 3 19234 E 961.70 62 31- 117 -29 -09 -0640 Lowell D. Otto E77.5' of 5132' of Lot 8 A Rt. 1, Box 281 W11.75' of 5132' of Lot 9, 23- 056 -0290 Silver Lake, MN 55381 N 1/2 City 3 11781 E 589.05 63 31- 117 -29 -09 -0630 Irvin B. A Minnie Amundson 209 -5th Ave. N.E. W66' of Lot 8, 23- 056 -0270 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 21839 E 1,091.95 64 31- 117 -29 -09 -0620 Christine Hakel 205 -5th Ave. N.E. 5109' of Lot 7, 23- 056 -0240 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 15751 3 787.55 65 31- 117 -29 -09 -0610 Ralph Hakel 525 Bluff St. N122' of 5231' of Lot 7, 23 -056 -0250 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 17885 y 894.25 66 31- 117 -29 -09 -0600 Avis J. Anderson 535 Bluff St. N 6 Rods of Lot 7, 23- 056 -0260 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 14721 3 736.05 67 31- 117 -29 -09 -0590 James A Laurie Hulkonen 555 Bluff St. S66' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0230 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 9928 496.40 68 31- 117 -29 -09 -0580 Mary Lou Kroells 565 Bluff St. N66' of S132' of Lot 6, 23 -056 -0220 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 10023 $ 501.15 69 31- 117 -29 -09 -0570 Arthur A Arlys Berke 575 Bluff St. Center 66' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0210 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 10184 $ 509.20 70 31- 117 -29 -09 -0560 Rebecca Hutchins 585 Bluff St. S66' of N132' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0200 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 10214 $ 510.70 MJJtJOMGNf hVLL NO. 252 LE'Cf1NG NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PEN UNITE 0.05 UOMPILED BYS COMPUTED BY: ZKl0w V. Priebe M ow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEA206INES A APPURTENANCES IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF ST ROM THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: TOTAL CHECKED BY: 1W Rice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: 10 NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 71 SQUA T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A.ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 71 31- 117 -29 -09 -0550 Alice A Harry Jorgensen 595 Bluff St. N66' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0190 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 10309 515.45 72 31- 117 -29 -09 -0540 Rodney A Rebecca Saar 595 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 8 1 11777 E 588.85 73 31- 117 -29 -09 -0530 Dwayne A Diane Briese 585 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 7 1 10052 502.60 74 31- 117 -29 -09 -0520 Rodney A Barbara Markgraf 575 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 6 1 10153 $ 507.65 75 31- 117 -29 -09 -0510 James R. Slyter 565 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 5 1 9827 $ 491.35 76 31- 117 -29 -09 -0500 Bruce 6 Patricia Block 560 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 4 1 9814 $ 490.70 77 31- 117- 29-09 -0490 Arthur A Emma Janzen 570 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 3 1 10006 $ 500.30 78 31 -117- 29-09 -0480 Jolene Ellsworth 580 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson's Terrace 2 1 10060 E 503.00 79 31- 117 -29 -09 -0470 Wendell Wulkan 590 Peterson Circle 23- 059 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Peterson'a Terrace 1 1 11760 a 588.00 80 31- 117 -29 -09 -0460 Louise Rettman 252 -6th Ave. N.E. 23- 056 -0180 Hutchinson, MN 55350 W 1/2 Lot 3, N 1/2 City 3 25547 j 1,277.35 Ab- L5'iMKNf HULL NU. U[ LEI'1'ING NU. 9, PRUJECT NU. 69 -15 GUST PEN UNIT: 0.05 COMPILED BY: COMPUTED BY: M rlow V. Priebe Mow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEA NES A APPURTENANCES IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF ST FROM THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: W Ries FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUA0100T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 81 31- 117 -29 -09 -0450 Michael A Shawn Smithers 262 -6th Ave. N.E. 23- 056 -0170 Hutchinson, MN 55350 E 112 Lot 3, N 1/2 City 3 25547 $ 1,277.35 82 31- 117 -29 -09 -0440 Mille Lacs Aggregate Lot 2 Ex W91.51' of S333.8' of Lot 2 A EX. E52' of 5238' of 23- 056 -0160 Milaca, MN 56353 Lot 2, N 1/2 City 3 16872 $ 843.60 83 31- 117 -29 -09 -0430 Leonard A M. Fredrickson 245 -5th Ave. N.E. W91.51' of 5333.8' of Lot 2, 23- 056 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 29556 E 1,477.80 84 31- 117 -29 -09 -0420 Harold A Ruth A. Rusch 251 -5th Ave. N.E. E52' of S238' of Lot 2, 23- 056 -0140 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 11336 E 566.80 85 31- 117 -29 -09 -0410 June Redman 255 -5th Ave. N.E. W55' of Lot 1 N of Road EX RR, 23- 056 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 10175 $ 508.75 86 31- 117 -29 -09 -0400 June Redman 255 -5th Ave. N.E. Lot 1 EX W551A EX R/W of MW RY 23- 056 -0130 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 7654 $ 382.70 87 31- 117 -29 -09 -0281 Earl A Bernice Hall 655 Hillcrest Road .20 AC of Lot 9, 23 -238 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Aud. Plat N 1/2 Sec. 31 8612 $ 430.60 88 31- 117 -29 -09 -0271 Gary L. A Marlon J. Graham 655 Hillcrest Road An Irregular Tract of Lot 2 on 23- 056 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N Side of Block 1, N 112 City 5850 ; 292.50 89 31- 117 -29 -09 -0261 John A Lori Hutchinson 645 Hillcrest Road N50' of S326' of Lot 2, 23- 056 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 8208 i 410.40 90 31- 117 -29 -09 -0251 Vernon D. A Elsie Anderson 635 Hillcrest Road 78' N of S198' of Lot 2, 23- 056 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 12743 $ 637.15 ASSESSMENT PULL NO. 252 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNITS S 0.05 COMPILED BY S low V. COMPUTED BY: w V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD ES A APPURTENANCES Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STR flOM THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 0 *T CHECKED BY: ice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUAR ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 91 31- 117 -29 -09 -0230 Robert Dietz A S. Norgaard 155 -6th Ave. N.E. 23- 056 -0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 S69' of Lot 2, N 112 City 1 10994 E 549.70 92 31- 117 -29 -09 -0220 Roger R. A Lois Leaks 606 Bluff St. 23- 056 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 369' of Lot 1, N 1/2 City 1 10994 $ 549.70 93 31- 117 -29 -09 -0210 Dwayne Block A Sandra Hunt 620 Bluff St. 69' N of S69' of Lots 1 A 29 23- 056 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 22179 s 1,108.95 94 31- 117 -29 -09 -0200 Paul L. A Jean V. Ackland 626 Bluff St. 60' N of 5138' of Lots 1 A 2, 23- 056 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 19424 j 971.20 95 31- 117 -29 -09 -0190 Kenneth A E. J. Felska 632 Bluff St. 78' N of S198' of Lot 1, 23- 056.0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 12743 $ 637.15 96 31- 117 -29 -09 -0180 Robert A Marjorie Brandt 638 Bluff St. N'ly 87' of S363' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 13911 $ 695.55 97 31- 117 -29 -09 -0170 Howard A Patricia Vleek 648 Bluff St. Part of Lots 1 A 2, 23- 056 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 19098 $ 954.90 98 31- 117 -29 -09 -0161 Joe A Cheryl Dooley 750 Harmony Lane .80 AC of Lot 9 23 -238 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Aud. Plat N 1/2 Sec. 31 17424 $ 871.20 99 31- 117 -29 -09 -0160 Joe A Cheryl Dooley 750 Harmony Lane 23- 056 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Part of Lot 1, N 1/2 City 1 7125 $ 356.25 100 31- 117 -29 -09 -0150 Ronald J. McCraw Citizens Bank Bldg. P.O. Box 108 75' x 155.90' of Lot 1, 23- 096 -0130 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 16527 $ 826.35 ASSESSMENT 'ROLL NO. 252 COMPILED BY:- Mar V. Priebe COMPUTED BY. MaV. Priebe CHECKED BY: Cal a LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: $ 0.05 STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF LEAD L.J& & APPURTENANCES STREE THE SOUTH SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: TOTAL FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NORTH T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SQUARE F ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 101 31- 117 -29 -09 -0145 Floyd & Mae Hoel 1390 Roberts Road 23- 097 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's 2nd Subd. 5 1 10517 $ 525.85 102 31- 117 -29 -09 -0144 Robert & Barbara Hoel c/o Floyd A Mae Hoel 1390 Roberts Road 23-097 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's 2nd Subd. 4 1 10481 $ 524.05 103 31- 117 -29 -09 -0143 Bruce Rahn 625 Waller Dr. 23- 097 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's 2nd Subd. 3 1 10481 $ 524.05 104 31- 117 -29 -09 -0142 Paul Betker 410 School Road No. 23 -097 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's 2nd Subd. 2 1 10481 $ 524.05 105 31- 117 -29- 09-0141 Sidney & Geraldine Grams 645 Waller Dr. 23- 097 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's 2nd Subd. 1 1 10962 $ 548.10 106 31- 117 -29 -09 -0130 John & Brenda Beckman 80.42' x 109.40' EX S3.39' of 667 Bluff St. Lot A & Lot 3, 23- 096 -0160 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 24500 $ 1,225.00 107 31- 117 -29 -09 -0120 Walter J. & Harriet Macho & James E. & Pamela Helget 677 Bluff St. N80.42' of Lot A & Lot 2, 23 -096 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 16484 $ 824.20 108 31- 117 -29 -09 -0110 Thomas & Lauri Ginkel 687 Bluff St. ICI 23- 096 -0140 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 2 12741 $ 637.05 109 31- 117-29 -09 -0100 Merrill & Mary Lou LIDke 455 Northwoods Ave. W 112 Lot 9 & Lot 10 Ex E20', 23- 096 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 12611 $ 630.55 110 31- 117 -29 -09 -0090 Alvin V. & Harriet Exsted Rt. 1 E 112 Lot 9, E20' Lot 10 & 23- 096 -0120 Silver [Ake, MN 55381 Lot 11, Waller's Subd. 1 12843 A 642.15 me. uwL uv. 1�[ LUTING NU. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: 0.05 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD NES A APPURTENANCES SERVICE LEAD: CQMPUTED BYs V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 PC CHECKED BY: �oW Aioe FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NO F T.N. 7 UNIT USED: SQUAB ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 111 31- 117 -29 -09 -0080 Mark A Mary Guggemos 626 Waller Dr. 23- 096 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 8 1 9368 = 468.40 112 31- 117-29 -09 -0073 Ethel M. Hendrickson Klima 647 Bluff St. Portion of Lot 7 Lying E'ly of 23- 096 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Lot 5, Waller's Subd. 1 4134 $ 206.70 113 31- 117 -29 -09 -0072 Harvey L. A Alice Kemper 637 Bluff St. 23 -096 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Part of Lot 7, Waller's Subd. 1 2630 $ 131.50 114 31- 117 -29 -09 -0071 Mark A Mary'Guggemos 626 Waller Dr. S27.5' of Lot 7, 23- 096 -0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 2876 f 143.80 115 31- 117 -29 -09 -0060 Donald A Leona Jahnke 657 Bluff St. Lot 6 A N'ly Portion of Lot 71 23- 096 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 11690 E 584.50 116 31 -117 -29-09 -0050 Ethel M. Hendrickson Klima 647 Bluff St. 23- 096.0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 5 1 8250 E 412.50 117 31- 117 -29 -09 -0040 Harvey L. A Alice Kemper 637 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 4 1 8250 E 412.50 118 31- 117 -29 -09 -0030 Lyle A Angela Christensen 627 Bluff St. 23-096 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 3 1 9375 ' 468.75 119 31- 117 -29 -09 -0020 Carl A Bertha Baumetz 617 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 1 10500 S 525.00 120 31- 117 -29 -09 -0100 Ronnie H. A Gail Telecky 607 Bluff St. 23 -096 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 1 10290 514.50 ASSESSMENT ROLL 0. 252 COMPILED BY: &w V. COMPUTED BY: x V. CHECKED BY: Cal Rice LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD NES A APPURTENANCES Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STR ROM THE SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NO F T.H. 7 1.1 -1 t'cu SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: UNIT USED: 10 SOUA0T ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 121 31- 117 -29 -15 -0020 Gordon Frank 595 Lynn Road Lot 1 Ex E84', Lot 2 A Lot 3 23- 056 -2010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 EX W96.65', N 1/2 City 19 3938 E 196.90 122 31- 117 -29 -15 -0010 Robert A Delores Powell Rt. 2, S. Jefferson 23- 056 -2000 Hutchinson, MN 55350 E84' of Lot 1, N 1/2 City 19 7434 $ 371.70 123 32- 117 -29 -12 -0240 Mille Lacs Aggregate LB EX 1.5AC A EX N101, W63.9' L7 EX N10' A L9 EX N137.5' A 23-246 -0040 Milaca, MN' 56353 E207'(TH7- .10AC)AP W 112 Sec32 376401 E 18,820.05 124 32- 117 -29 -12 -0020 Hutchinson Industrial Corp. Hutchinson Technology, Ina, 40 West Highland Park Drive 6.42 AC of Lot 1, Hutchinson 23 -242 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Industrial Corp. Plat 1 279655 $ 13,982.75 125 32- 117 -29 -12 -0010 Hutchinson Industrial Corp. All that part L1 Lying N'ly of Hutchinson Teohnology, Inc. Hackberry Av A N'ly Vac, Hack - 40 West Highland Park Dr. berry Av EX 6.42AC A 1/2 Vac. 23- 242 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hackberry Av Hutch. Ind. Corp. 1 126243 E 6,312.15 126 32-117 -29 -05 -0010 Our Savior's Lutheran Church 800 Bluff St. Part of Lot 2, Aud. Plat 23- 246 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 W 1/2 Sec. 32 52500 $ 2,625.00 127 32- 117 -29 -05 -0001 Hutchinson Industrial Corp. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 West Highland Park Dr. Part of Lots 3A4 Aud. Plat EX 23- 246 -0015 Hutchinson, MN 55350 7.30 AC of Lot 3 W 1/2 Sec. 32 850000 $ 42,500.00 128 31- 117 -29 -10 -0980 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. West Lot 2 EX N132' A Lots 3 A 10, 23- 056 -1680 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 75031 $ 3,751.55 129 31- 117 -29 -10 -0960 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. West Lots 4 -5 A N108' of Lot 8, $ 4,582.70 23- 056 -1690 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 91654 TOTAL STORM SEWER a 39,795.95 E 37,865.03 a 95,651.10 $173,312.08 ... ... ,: U. , cr;. e N . : a 0.05 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe STORM SEWER LINES, MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, LEAD LINES A APPURTENANCES SERVICE, LEAD: COMPUTED BY: jmlow V. Priebe IN THE DRAINAGE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUFF STRJMFROM THE SOUTH NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 0 &T CHECKED BY: 0 Rice FORK OF THE CROW RIVER TO 2,600' NOWF T.H. 7 UNIT USED: SOUA ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 130 31- 117 -29 -10 -0150 Hugh D. A Dale A. Foster 145 -5th Ave. N.E. E 1/3 of Lot 9 Ex S75'of N150' 23- 056 -0530 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 8728 a 436.40 131 31- 117 -29 -10 -0140 Stella May Kuester, Etal 141 -5th Ave. N.E. Center 1/3 of Lot 9, 23 -056 -0520 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 8728 E 436.40 132 31- 117 -29 -10 -0130 Deane A Maxine DSetel 845 -2nd Ave. S.E. West 1/3 of Lot 9, 23- 056 -0510 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 8728 a 436.40 133 31- 117 -29 -10 -0120 B. F. A Barbara Schroer N31' of 5221' of W88' of Lot 8 123 -5th Ave. N.E. EX W121A E65.511of 5180' Lot 8 23- 056 -0500 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 14148 E 707.40 134 31- 117 -29 -10 -0100 Joyce A Scott Cr1RP3 3149' L8 EX W12' of 5221' A EX 121 -5th Ave. N.E. E Portion Being 62' on N Line 23- 056 -0480 Hutchinson, MN 55350 A 65.51' on S Line, N 112 City 4 9834 a 491.70 TOTAL STORM SEWER a 39,795.95 E 37,865.03 a 95,651.10 $173,312.08 n...........nir n��� o... . -�� COMPILED BY: Marlow V. CQMPUTED'BY: ow V. CHECKED BY Rice 1.cu1Nu Nu. i, PNUJCCT NO. Ug —Ito Priebe GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, VjAINING WALL, Priebe BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENAN N BLUFF STREET FROM T.H. 7 TO 2,600' NOW GOJ] PER UNI'fl SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: UNIT USED: i 20.00 10 FROMOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 135 31- 117 -29 -09 -1150 Wesley E. A N. V. Mattkins 455 Bluff St. Lot 6 EX N156.7' A EX T.N. 7, 23 -056 -1830 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 173.7 $ 3,474.00 136 31- 117 -29 -09 -1140 C. Anderson 6 J. Celander 465 Bluff St. 66' S of N90.7' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -1840 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 66 E 1,320.00 137 31- 117 -29 -09 -1130 Rodney A Tammy Kirchoff 206 -5th Ave. N.E. N90.7' of Lot 6, 23-056 -1820 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 15 90.7 $ 1,814.00 138 31- 117 -29 -09 -1090 Ronald A Pauline Dostal 193 Park Ave. Part of Lots 11 A 12 EX T.N. 7 23 -056 -1760 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 78 $ 1,560.00 139 31- 117 -29 -09 -1080 Jeffrey A Mary Horrocks 456 Bluff St. E120' of S66' of Lot 1, 23 -056 -1610 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 66 E 1,320.00 140 31- 117 -29 -09 -1070 Gary A. A Patricia Clyne 466 Bluff St. N70' of 5136' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -1620 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 70 $ 1,400.00 141 31- 117 -29 -09 -1060 Sumiko Nelson 476 Bluff St. N62' of S198' of Lot 1, 23-056-1630 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 62 $ 1,240.00 142 31- 117 -29 -09 -1050 Raymond A Luella Nass 480 Bluff St. 66' x 120' of Lot 1 S. of N66' 23- 056 -1640 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 14 66 $ 1,320.00 143 31- 117 -29 -09 -1040 Carol Roach 194 -5th Ave. N.E. N66' of E120' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -1650 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 14 66 E 1,320.00 144 31- 117 -29 -09 -0770 Thomas A Pamela Ertl 504 Bluff St. Lot 4 Ex N3', 23 -084 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Briggs Addition, N 1/2 City 4 67.63 E 1,352.60 xw uo..rcrva 11 t n'. � LEITING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: ; 0.00 COMPILED BY: Marlow V. Priebe GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND CUTTER, INING WALL, SERVICE LEAD: TOTAL CQMPUTED BY: V. Priebe BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANT BLUFF NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: "ow Rice STREET FROM T.H. 7 TO 2,600' NO UNIT USED: FRONT FOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 145 31-117 -29 -09 -0760 Patrick A Marlyce Fistman 17820 Co. Rd. G. Lot 3 A N3' Lot 4, 23- 084 -0030 Plymouth, MN 55447 Brigg's Addition, N 112 City 4 69 $ 1,380.00 146 31- 117 -29 -09 -0750 Fred G. A Olga J. Kern 534 Bluff St. 23 -084 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Brigg'a Addition, N 112 City 2 4 66 $ 1,320.00 147 31- 117 -29 -09 -0740 Lillian Zajicek 544 Bluff St. 23 -084 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Briggs Addition, N 112 City 1 4 66 $ 1,320.00 148 31- 117 -29 -09 -0730 Randy A Mary Anderson 566 Bluff St. 3132' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0380 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 132 $ 2,640.00 149 31- 117 -29 -09 -0720 N. F. A Velma Phillips 576 Bluff St. Center 66' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0370 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 66 $ 1,320.00 150 31- 117 -29 -09 -0710 Diane Rupp c/o Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 W. Highland Park Dr. 66' S. of N66' of Lot 1, 23 -056 -0360 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 66 $ 1,320.00 151 31 -117- 29-09 -0700 Elsie Orr A Jewell Orr 596 Bluff St. N66' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0350 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 4 66 E 1,320.00 152 31- 117 -29 -09 -0620 Christine Hakel 205 -5th Ave. N.E. 5109' of Lot 7, 23- 056 -0240 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 109 $ 2,180.00 153 31- 117 -29- 09-0610 Ralph Bakal 525 Bluff St. N122' of 3231' of Lot 7, 23- 056 -0250 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 122 $ 2,440.00 154 31- 117 -29- 09-0600 Avis J. Anderson 535 Bluff St. N 6 Rods of Lot 7, 23- 056 -0260 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 99 $ 1,980.00 ASSE33MEN1' MULL NO. 252 LE'ITr1NO NO. 5, PROJECT NO, 89 -15 C051 PEN UNIT: 20.00 ASSESSABLE SERVICE COMPILED BY: COMPUTED'BY: Marlow V. Priebe V. Priebe GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, JKAINING WALL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANN BLUFF SERVICE LEAD: NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION CHECKED BY: "ow Rice STREET FROM T.H. 7 TO 2,600' N UNIT USED: FRO ODT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 155 31- 117 -29 -09 -0590 James A Laurie Hulkonen 555 Bluff St. 366' of Lot 6, 23 -056 -0230 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 66 $ 1,320.00 156 31- 117 -29 -09 -0580 Mary Lou Kroells 565 Bluff St. N66' of 5132' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0220 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 66 $ 1,320.00 157 31- 117 -29 -09 -0570 Arthur A Arlys Bjerke 575 Bluff St. Center 66' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0210 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 66 $ 1,320.00 158 31- 117 -29 -09 -0560 Rebecca Hutchins 585 Bluff St. S66' of N132' of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0200 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 3 66 E 1,320.00 159 31- 117 -29 -09 -0550 Alice A Harry Jorgensen 595 Bluff St. N661 of Lot 6, 23- 056 -0190 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 3 66 $ 1,320.00 160 31- 117 -29- 09-0220 Roger R. 8 Lois Leaks 606 Bluff St. S691 of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 69 $ 1,380.00 161 31- 117 -29 -09 -0210 Dwayne Block A Sandra Hunt 620 Bluff St. 691 N of S69' of Lots 1 A 2, 23- 056 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 69 f 1,380.00 162 31- 117 -29 -09 -0200 Paul L. A Jean V. Ackland 626 Bluff St. 60' N of 51381 of Lots 1 A 21 23-056 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 60 $ 1,200.00 163 31- 117 -29 -09 -0190 Kenneth A E. J. Felska 632 Bluff St. 78' N of $198' Lot 1, 23- 056 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 78 $ 1,560.00 164 31- 117 -29 -09 -0180 Robert A Marjorie Brandt 648 Bluff St. N'ly 87' of 5363' of Lot 1, 23- 056 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 87 $ 1,740.00 „_...... _.,..., -..,. ,,... .., moo.,, ill,, Nu. �, YHUJUCI Nu. 09 -IS CO .SI' PEH INIT: S 20.00 COMPILED BY: COMPUTED BY: Marlow V. Priebe ow V. Priebe GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, R ALINING WALL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANC BLUFF SERVICE LEADS NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: lWice STREET FROM T.H. 7 TO 2,600' NO UNIT USED: FRO ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 165 31- 117-29 -09 -0170 Howard A Patricia Vlcek 648 Bluff St. Part of Lots 1 A 29 23- 056 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 1/2 City 1 90 E 1,800.00 166 31- 117 -29 -09 -0161 Joe A Cheryl Dooley 750 Harmony Lane .80 AC of Lot 9, Aud. Plat 23-238 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 Sec. 31 220 E 4,400.00 167 31- 117 -29 -09 -0160 Joe A Cheryl Dooley 750 Harmony Lane Part of Lot 1, 23 -056 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 1 85 E 1,700.00 168 31- 117-29 -09 -0130 John A Brenda Beckman 80.42' x 109.40' ER 53.39' of 667 Bluff St. Lot A A Lot 3, 23- 096 -0160 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 105.9 E 2,118.00 169 31- 117 -29 -09 -0120 Walter J. A Harriet Macho A James E. A Pamela Helgat 677 Bluff St. N80.42' of Lot A A Lot 2, 23- 096 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 80 E 1,600.00 170 31- 117 -29 -09 -0110 Thomas A Lauri Ginkel 687 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0140 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 2 86.32 L 1,726.40 171 31- 117 -29 -09 -0060 Donald A Leona Jahnke 657 Bluff St. Lot 6 A N'ly Portion Lot 7, 23 -096 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 90 E 1,800.00 172 31- 117 -29 -09 -0050 Ethel M. Hendrickson Klima 647 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 5 1 75 $ 1,500.00 173 31- 117 -29 -09 -0040 Harvey L. A Alice Kemper 637 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 4 1 75 E 414.95 E 1,085.05 174 31 -117- 29-09 -0030 Lyle A Angela Christensen 627 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 3 1 75 $ 1,500.00 i AJStSJMENI NULL NO. 252 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 89 -15 COST PER UNIT: ; 00 CJMPILED BY: ow V. Priebe GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CUflB AND GUTTER, NINO WALL, SERVICE LEAD: COUNTY PID NUMBER COMPUTED BY: V. Priebe BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANCE BLUFF NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 6 10 CHECKED BY: ice STREET FROM T.N. 7 TO 2,600' NOR UNIT USED: FRONT FOOT ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. LINE COST LEAD COST CREDITS ASSESSMENT 175 31- 117 -29 -09 -0020 Carl A Bertha Baumetz 617 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 2 1 75 E 1,500.00 176 31- 117 -29 -09 -0010 Ronnie H. A Gail Telecky 607 Bluff St. 23- 096 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Waller's Subd. 1 1 75 ; 1,500.00 177 31- 117 -29 -08 -0630 Anthony Maehtemes Box 341 23 -238 -0030 Franklin, MN 55333 178 32- 117 -29 -05 -0010 Our Savior's Lutheran Church 800 Bluff St. 23 -246 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 179 32- 117 -29 -05 -0001 Hutchinson Industrial Corp. Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 West Highland Park Dr. 23- 246 -0015 Hutchinson, MN 55350 TOTAL STORM SEWER TOTAL STREET TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 252 51234.94' of Lot 7 EX Mae's Bluff Add., A EX .07 AC SE of C.P. 7 Aud. Plat N 112 Sec. 31 240 ; 4,800.00 Part of Lot 2, Aud. Plat W 1/2 Sec. 32 320 ; 6,400.00 Part of Lots 3 A 4, EX 7.30 AC Aud. Plat W 112 Sec. 32 450 ; 91000.00 ;221,525.78 ; 89,630.05 ;311,155.83 16 V 2 Col. X 5" Boxed Ad CITY OF HUTCHINSON P U B L I C N O T I C E BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING JUNRER SANITATION SERVICES 6:30 P.M. TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 1989 The City Council of the City of Hutchinson will meet to hold a Board of Review on Junker Sanitation services at City Hall. The Board of Review will allow any and all residential and commercial establishments to review their commercial rates with the City Council and Junker Sanitation. PUBLICATION NO. 4008 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 1989