Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp11-22-1994 cAlIkk AdIbk Aik
qr
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDA
-20-
-21-
-22-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Center to
...-
Complete Policies
5:15 P.M. - Telecommunication
5:15 P.M. - City Council and
Commission Meeting at
Directors Workshop at
City Center Staff
City Center (with Robt.
HUTCHINSON
Conference Room
Fjerstad)
CITY
CALENDAR
6:30 P.M. - Light Traffic
7:30 P.M. - City Council
Task Force Meeting at
Meeting at City Center
City Center Main
Week of
Conference Room
Nov. 20 t0 Nov. 26
1994
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
THANR.SGIYING DAY
ALL CITY OFFICES CLOSED
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Center
l
V
AGENDA
• REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER - 7:30 P.M.
2. INVOCATION - Rev. Thor Skeie, Faith Lutheran Church
3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 7, 1994 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS ON
NOVEMBER 1, 1994
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. FINANCIAL REPORT - OCTOBER 1994
CITY INVESTMENTS REPORT
2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1994
3. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF OCTOBER 31, 1994
4. HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES
OF OCTOBER 18, 1994
5. HUTCHINSON HOUSING, INC. MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 1994
6. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24, 1994
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1.
RESOLUTION
NO.
10338 -
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
2.
RESOLUTION
NO.
10339 -
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING FUNDS
FROM 1980 TAX
INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND TO 1985,
1990 AND 1992
TAX INCREMENT
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
3.
RESOLUTION
NO.
10343 -
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 10335,
LETTING NO.
5, PROJECT NO. 95 -05
4.
RESOLUTION
NO.
10344 -
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 10337,
LETTING NO.
7, PROJECT NO. 95 -07, 95 -08,
95 -09
5. RESOLUTION NO. 10345 - TRANSFERRING $65,000 FROM
LIQUOR FUND TO GENERAL FUND
(c) SNOW REMOVAL PERMIT FOR RORY C. KARG
(d) DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
(e) CHANGE ORDER NO. 3, LETTING NO. 12, PROJECT NO. 94 -28 AND
LETTING NO. 3, PROJECT NO. 94 -03; CHANGE ORDER NO. 1,
LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 94 -05 AND LETTING NO. 8,
PROJECT NO. 94 -09
(f) ELIMINATION OF TABLE AND CHAIR RENTALS EFFECTIVE IN 1995
(g) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY
TREATMENT CENTER /BETHANY BAPTIST CHURCH TO CHANGE USE FROM
CHURCH TO SHELTER HOME IN R -2 DISTRICT WITH UNFAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
(h) AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464, SECTION 10.08,
REGARDING ANTENNAS AND TOWERS WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS BY PLANNING
COMMISSION (FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 94 -125 AND SET
SECOND READING FOR DECEMBER 13, 1994)
•
(i) ANNEXATION OF 8.50 ACRES IN LYNN TOWNSHIP REQUESTED BY
ROBERT COWGER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS BY PLANNING COMMISSION (FIRST READING OF
ORDINANCE NO. 94 -126 AND SET SECOND READING FOR DECEMBER
13, 1994) •
(j) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE 1972 MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT
IN MCDONALD'S TRAILER COURT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS BY PLANNING COMMISSION (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 10340)
(k) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CINDY BEADELL TO SELL
CHRISTMAS TREES IN R -2 DISTRICT LOCATED AT 540 GLEN STREET
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS BY
PLANNING COMMISSION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 10341)
(1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DOUG RETTKE TO MOVE
BUILDING FOR WAREHOIUSE TO I/C DISTRICT LOCATED AT 184
FOURTH AVENUE NW WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDTAION OF STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS BY PLANNING COMMISSION (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 10342)
(m) REZONING PROPERTY ON HWY. 7 EAST FROM R -1 TO C -4 REQUESTED
BY ROBERT BARWICK FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MOTEL WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS BY PLANNING
COMMISSION (FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 94 -127 AND SET
SECOND READING FOR DECEMBER 13, 1994)
(n) APPLICATION FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES PERMIT FROM CINDY
BEADELL
•
Action - Motion to approve consent agenda
PA
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEMBER 22, 1994
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
None
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) SEE CONSENT AGENDA
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING PROPERTY ADJACENT TO COMPOST
SITE AND "HATS" FACILITY (DEFERRED NOVEMBER 7, 1994)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH
MCNELLY GROUP FOR DEMONSTRATION COMPOSTING PROJECT
• Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into contract
•
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING DATE FOR SPECIAL MEETING FOR
REVIEW OF 1995 BUDGET
Action -
(c) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING PUBLIC HEARING DATE
CONCERNING LOCAL ADMISSIONS POLICY FOR PARK TOWERS
Action -
(d) CONSIDERATION OF PARKS /RECREATION /COMMUNITY EDUCATION
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO INITIATE 1.5% CAPITAL
OUTLAY ACCOUNT IN 1995 PARKS /RECREATION BUDGET
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE OF PHARMACY AUTOMATED MEDICATION
SYSTEM FOR HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - NOVEA�ER 22, 1994 .
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROG CITY ADMINISTRATOR
1. LIQUOR STORE UPbATE /REPORTING AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
Action - Motion to3approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. ADJOURNMENT
0
•
•
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1994
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor
Torgerson. Present were: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council
Members Bill Craig, John Mlinar, Kay Peterson, and Don
Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz,
City Engineer John Rodeberg, and City Attorney G. Barry
Anderson.
2. In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
3. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of October 25, 1994 were
approved as distributed.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - OCTOBER 1994
2. HOSPITAL /NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 20,
1994
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1, ORDINANCE NO. 94 -121 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING SECTION 4.05 OF THE
HUTCHINSON CITY CODE REQUIRING DEMOLITION PERMITS
AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 IN
SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
2. ORDINANCE NO. 94 -122 - AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO
INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND OWNED BY ROBERT BARWICK AND
ABUTTING THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES 414.033, SUBDIVISION 2(3)
(SECOND READING OF AMENDED ORDINANCE AND ADOPT)
3. ORDINANCE NO. 94 -123 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE
PROPERTY LINES, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
LOCATED ALONG PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOTS 6 AND 7 AND
LOTS 7 AND 8, BLOCK 3, ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS
(SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
4. ORDINANCE NO. 94 -124 - AN ORDINANCE TO VACATE
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1201 MAIN STREET NORTH (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
Ej
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7, 1994
5. RESOLUTION NO. 10331 - RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL
TO CHANGE STREET NAME IN THE PLAT RECORDED AS
PARKSIDE SECOND ADDITION
6. RESOLUTION NO. 10332 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
7. RESOLUTION NO. 10333 - RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED
ASSESSMENTS (ROLL NO. 296 & 296A)
8. RESOLUTION NO. 10334 - RESOLUTION ORDERING
PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT, LETTING NO. 5,
PROJECT NO. 95 -05 (HARMONY LANE /LINCOLN AVENUE)
9. RESOLUTION NO. 10335 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT, LETTING
NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 95 -05
10. RESOLUTION NO. 10336 - RESOLUTION ORDERING
PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT, LETTING NO. 7,
PROJECT NO. 95 -07, 08, 09 (FIFTH AVENUE NE /PROSPECT
STREET /SIXTH AVENUE NE)
11. RESOLUTION NO. 10337 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT, LETTING
NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 95 -07, 08, 09
(c) SNOW REMOVAL PERMIT FOR GENE C. BETKER, DICK EWERT JR.
AND WHITE CONSTRUCTION
(d) GAMBLING LICENSE FOR ABATE TO HOLD RAFFLE OF MOTORCYCLE
(e) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS:
1. ROY M. JOHNSEN - PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD
2. DENNIS SCHROEDER - TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
3. HOSPITAL /NURSING HOME BOARD - ELAINE BLACK AND
RICHARD MYERS
The motion to approve the consent agenda, except for item
4 -b (7), was made by Council Member Mlinar, seconded by
Council Member Peterson and unanimously carried.
Following discussion of Resolution No. 10333 regarding
the revised assessments, the motion to approve and adopt
was made by Council Member Craig, seconded by Council
Member Mlinar and unanimously carried.
2
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7, 1994
0
5. PUBLIC HEARING
(a) DRAFT OF FACILITIES PLAN AMENDMENT AND RECOMMENDED PLAN
FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY BY RUST E & I
Mayor Torgerson called the public hearing to order at
8:00 P.M. Engineer Ed Nevers from RUST E &I explained the
results of the study conducted to determine if the City's
wastewater treatment facilities were in compliance with
the sludge regulations which go into effect by Feburary
1995. The preliminary draft of the Facilities Plan
Amendment and the recommended plan for the wastewater
treatment facility was presented. Mr. Nevers recommended
a composting facility taking in yard waste for the final
disposal of biosolids.
The motion to close the hearing at 8:15 P.M. was made by
Council Member Erickson, seconded by Council Member
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
After the hearing, options were discussed and approval
was given for City staff to proceed with the concrete pad
at the wastewater treatment plant to facilitate the
holding of the containerized composters.
Since the MPCA must approve the project, Mr. Nevers and
Mr. Jim McNelly suggested the following procedure: (1)
authorize sending a letter to the State regarding what
the project would involve; (2) proceed with scraping of
the material prior to winter's arrival; (3) prepare a
leasing arrangement for the composting equipment; and (4)
finalize the contract for the containerized composting
program at the next Council meeting.
Following discussion, the motion to proceed with the soil
preparation to get the earth work done and to accept the
City Administrtor's recommendation to wait two weeks to
meet the February 1995 deadline was made by Council
Member Craig, seconded by Council Member Erickson and
unanimously carried.
The motion to approve the Facilities Plan Amendment was
made by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Council
Member Craig and unanimously carried.
6. COMMUNICATIONS REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7, 1994
0
(a) PRESENTATION BY TOM SAVAGE REGARDING MCLEOD COUNTY
HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PROPOSAL FOR RENTAL UNITS
IN HUTCHINSON
Mr. Tom Savage presented a report from the Community
Action Agency regarding the need for rental units in
every community within McLeod County. The Board has
approached the County Commissioners for a bond issue to
finance construction of units in the county. It was
noted that the towns of Hutchinson and Glencoe had been
excluded from the plan to avoid any conflict with private
developers who are building rental unit structures. Mr.
Savage promised to keep the Council informed of the
project's development.
(b) PRESENTATION BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR ON COMMUNITY SURVEY
RESULTS
Administrator Plotz presented a comparison of the city
surveys from 1988 and 1991 with the recent tallied
results from the 1994 community survey by means of
graphic overheads. He reported approximately 1,750
residents responded to the survey.
(c) DISCUSSION OF COUNTY SUB - COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TO
INCREASE COUNTY TIPPING FEE (ON OUT -OF- COUNTY GARBAGE)
The City Administrator stated he had not heard the
Finance Committee's recommendation regarding the increase
in the County tipping fee to $2.60 by July 1, 1995.
Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council
that additional information was needed to reach a
decision.
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) SEE CONSENT AGENDA
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF 1995 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN MCLEOD
COUNTY AND CITY
The motion to approve the 1995 assessment agreement was
made by Council Member Mlinar, seconded by Council Member
4
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7, 1994
Peterson and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ENHANCEMENT
FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DOWNTOWN CROW RIVER TRAIL
Following discussion, the motion to approve the
Resolution of Support and agreement was made by Council
Member Peterson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CHANGE OF CEMETERY PRICE
STRUCTURE
Following discussion, the motion to approve the revised
price structure was made by Council Member Erickson,
seconded by Council Member Peterson and unanimously
carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASING PROPERTY ADJACENT TO COMPOST
SITE AND "HATS" FACILITY
Engineer Rodeberg reported the property adjacent to the
compost site and "HATS" facility was owned by Rod Riewer
who had an easement through the city property for access
to his landlocked lot. The owner had agreed to sell the
property to the City for $3,500.00 if he could keep the
RIM payment. The RIM program is for a 10 -year period,
and nothing can be done with the property during that
timeframe.
Following discussion, the motion to defer to the next
Council meeting was made by Council Member Mlinar,
seconded by Council Member Peterson and unanimously
carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER BILL CRAIG
Council Member Craig inquired about the City's quality
program.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN MLINAR
Council Member Mlinar asked about the outcome of the
meeting held with the Shopko manager and City staff.
Administrator Plotz informed him that the issues
discussed included: (1) replacement of some of the stones
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES,- NOVEMBER 7, 1994
between the Shopko parking lot and sidewalk with wood
chips or mulch; (2) minimal cleaning of the parking lot
with the City street sweeper; (3) cut off of youth
activity at the Shopko site might force it to shift to a
less desirable and controllable area; and (4) garbage
pickup in the parking lot.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER KAY PETERSON
Council Member Peterson wondered about the results of the
Hutchinson Utilities' fly -over energy audit. She was
told that the energy audit was not performed this year,
but another plan was offered.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER DON ERICKSON
Council Member Erickson inquired if the improvement for
Osgood Avenue was on the agenda.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz stated there was a final report on
the liquor store sales. He also noted the new computer
program was being utilized.
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg reported the testing program was
delayed. He also stated the good weather made it
possible for the grading work in Roberts Park to bes
completed, and Lakewood Drive had curb, gutter, and
gravel put in, with paving to be completed this month.
It was noted by the City Engineer that the Hutchinson
airport won an award for the best bituminous runway in
the state. On November 21 the award will be presented to
the City.
The City Engineer requested authorization to contract
with O.S.M. for the South Grade /Bluff Street bridge and
road work at a cost of $11,100.00 for the additional
work. He reported there was funding in the improvement
funds to cover the additional cost for the bridge work.
Following discussion,
additional cost by O.S.
Erickson, seconded by
unanimously carried.
the motion to approve the
M. was made by Council Member
Council Member Mlinar and
0
0
6 0
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - NOVEMBER 7, 1994
9
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR TORGERSON
Mayor Torgerson commended the outstanding recycling and
composting program in operation within the City of
Hutchinson.
(h) DRAWING FOR COMPOSTING PROGRAM WINNERS
Three names were drawn from a list of individuals who
participated in the composting program this year. The
winners were: > COMPOST BIN - John Hartman
• BLOWER VAC - Tracy Marquardt
• TORO LAWN MOWER - Mark Goldschmidt
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion to approve the claims and authorize payment
from appropriate funds was made by Council Member Mlinar,
seconded by Council Member Erickson and unanimously
carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:30
P.M.
7
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1994
The special meeting of the Board of Education and City Council was
called to order at 5:00 P.M. by Mayor Torgerson.
The following were present:
CITY COUNCIL- -Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members John Mlinar,
Kay Peterson, and Don Erickson; Council Member Bill Craig was
absent.
CITY STAFF - -City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Finance Director
Kenneth B. Merrill.
SCHOOL BOARD- -Chair Doug Kenning, Doug Brown, Don Popp, Steve
Borstad, Bonnie Baumetz, and Supt. Gary Swenson.
MODERATOR - -Ed Ide
Since the school district has been mandated to change its elections
from May to November by 1998, the discussion centered on the pros
and cons of an even or odd year election schedule for the school
district. The option of a joint school /city election was also
considered.
The School Board will take action on the issue at its next meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 5:55 P.M.
0
v
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1994
The special meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Mayor
Torgerson.
Present were: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members John Mlinar,
Kay Peterson, and Don Erickson; City Administrator Gary D. Plotz,
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, City Engineer John Rodeberg;
and Dennis Palmer, engineer from Barr Engineering. Council Member
Bill Craig was absent.
The discussion focused on the potential of a storm water utility
and its benefits.
The meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M.
'--Z
Is
9
OCTOBER 1994
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
42,870.20
OCTOBER 19
3,289.80
92.9%
1994
20,907.80
172,632.10
190,364.00
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL
OCT.
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAG
1,945.20
ACTUAL
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
• TAXES
0.00
665,628.08
1,294,497.00
628,868.92
51.4%
LICENSES
6,295.00
22,513.00
22,650.00
137.00
99.4%
PERMITS AND FEES
23,635.42
145,129.76
162,000.00
16,870.24
89.6%
INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE
6,976.00
1,198,070.88
2,239,548.00
1,041,477.12
53.5%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
315,428.73
815,605.23
874,841.00
59,235.77
93.2%
FINES & FORFEITS
3,768.52
35,472.80
56,250.00
20,777.20
63.1%
INTEREST
9,764.95
85,754.31
35,000.00
(50,754.31)
245.0%
SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
1,297.59
1,365.39
250.00
(1,115.39)
546.2%
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUND
200.00
286,200.00
548,500.00
262,300.00
52.2%
REIMBURSEMENTS
13,253.79
32,519.61
22,200.00
(10,319.61)
146.5%
SALES
90.5%
0.00
8,300.00
8,300.00
0.0%
TOTAL
380,620.00
3,288,259.06
5,264,036.00
1,975,776.94
62.5%
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERALFUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
6,786.70
42,870.20
46,160.00
3,289.80
92.9%
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
20,907.80
172,632.10
190,364.00
17,731.90
90.7%
ELECTIONS
216.70
5,279.80
7,225.00
1,945.20
73.1%
FINANCE
22,680.90
237,177.30
276,900.00
39,722.70
85.7%
MOTOR VENICE
10,143.10
76,148.50
81,576.00
5,427.50
93.3%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
24,300.00
24,300.00
0.0%
LEGAL
4,164.00
45,009.70
55,720.00
10,710.30
80.8%
PLANNING
4,954.70
16,266.70
8,150.00
(8,116.70)
199.6%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
137,324.00
1,115,643.50
1,287,174.00
171,530.50
86.7%
LIAISON OFFICER
5,409.80
35,012.10
38,613.00
3,600.90
90.7%
•SCHOOL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
4.30
53,052.90
1,850.00
(51,202.90)
2867.7%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.0%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
11,943.70
124,274.80
159,273.00
34,99820
78.0%
FIRE MARSHAL
2,239.60
19,152.40
21,16100
2,010.60
90.5%
BUILDING INSPECTION
11,737.70
97,702.50
106,669.00
8,966.50
91.6%
ENGINEERING
32,373.80
308,233.20
400,605.00
92,371.80
76.9%
STREETS & ALLEYS
40,478.30
367,668.20
448,047.00
80,378.80
82.1%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
5,888.40
64,634.60
90,200.00
25,565.40
71.7%
CITY HALL
7,243.40
108,876.90
67,837.00
(41,039.90)
160.5%
PARK/REC ADMIN.
12,584.40
116,329.50
129,730.00
13,400.50
89.7%
RECREATION
14,623.80
180,830.60
214,559.00
33,728.40
84.3%
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
7,500.50
73,293.70
88,263.00
14,969.30
83.0%
CIVIC ARENA
18,670.50
138,200.80
145,042.00
6,841.20
95.3%
PARK DEPARTMENT
53,067.20
517,369.90
530,795.00
13,425.10
97.5%
RECERATION BUILDING & POOL
4,795.90
85,249.10
77,825.00
(7,424.10)
109.5%
STREAMBANK PROGRAM
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
LIBRARY
1,295.20
86,670.40
91,528.00
4,857.60
94.7%
CEMETERY
10,113.60
67,337.60
70,606.00
3,268.40
95.4%
DEBT SERVICE
700.00
24,579.00
23,900.00
(679.00)
102.8%
AIRPORT
1,461.00
51,113.60
56,615.00
5,501.40
90.3%
TRANSIT
11,371.60
103,259.60
114,125.00
10,865.40
90.5%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
10,065.40
54,300.40
63,009.00
8,708.60
86.2%
SCDP COORD.
0.00
2,869.20
0.00
(2,869.20)
0.0%
UNALLOCATED
26,532.30
352,349.30
451,907.00
99,557.70
78.0%
TOTAL
497,278.30
4,743,388.10
5,369,980.00
626,591.90
56.09
9,249.40
9,249.40
OCTOBER 1994
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1994 OCTOBER
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
OCT.
YEARTO
ADOPTED
BALANCEPERCENT
ACTUAL
DATEACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED •
LIQUOR SALES
50,373.82
481,979.80
555,000.00
73,020.20
86.8%
WINE SALES
13,552.55
136,853.31
164,000.00
27,146.69
83.4%
BEER SALES
76,376.34
807,185.95
900,000.00
92,814.05
89.7%
BEER DEPOSIT
(282.72)
(464.32)
0.00
464.32
0.0%
MISC. SALES
5,624.67
61,565.90
60,000.00
(1,565.90)
102.6%
LOTTERY SALES
1,756.25
4,359.74
4,000.00
(359.74)
109.0%
INTEREST
250.42
6,325.34
2,000.00
(4,325.34)
316.3%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
210.00
5,572.37
(210.00)
0.0%
CASH DISCOUNTS
(893.71)
(9,728.83)
(1,500.00)
8,228.83
648.6%
TOTAL
146, 757.62
1,488, 286.89
1,683,500.00
195, 213.11
88.4%
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
15,263.04
105,080.45
123,758.00
18,677.55
84.9%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
258.90
5,251.92
4,250.00
(1,001.92)
123.6%
CONSULTING
0.00
1,169.90
2,000.00
830.10
58.5%
OTHER SERVICE & CHARGES
2,026.15
44,844.74
51,750.00
6,905.26
86.7%
DEPRECIATION
0.00
0.00
19,200.00
19,200.00
0.0%
DEBT SERVICE
0.00
35,950.00
35,370.00
(580.00)
101.6%
TRANSFERS
0.00
0.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
0.0%
COST OF SALES
142,099.50
1,240,556.95
1,272,654.00
32,097.05
97.5%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
5,572.37
6,100.00
527.63
91.4%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
2,500.00
13,367.10
15,000.00
1,632.90
0.0%
TOTAL
162,147.59
1,451,793.43
1,650,082.00
198,288.57
88.0% •
REVENUE REPORT -WATER
SEWER/FUND
RECYCLE BAGS
349.00
778.00
(778.00)
0.0%
WATER SALES
47,760.92
484,909.71
540,000.00
55,090.29
89.8%
WATER TREATMENT SURCHARGE
1,247.72
1,176.96
0.00
WATER METER
1,935.00
8,059.50
16,000.00
7,940.50
50.4%
REFUSE SERVICES
24,721.89
352,712.45
438,000.00
85,287.55
80.5%
REFUSE SURCHARGE
2,827.53
39,870.25
51,300.00
11,429.75
77.7%
REFUSE STICKER SALES
116.00
865.00
COMPOST CREDIT
(353.27)
(5,360.56)
SEWER SERVICES
125,690.19
1,424,135.88
1,800,000.00
375,864.12
79.1%
PENALTY CHARGES
2,495.14
22,793.99
15,000.00
(7,793.99)
152.0%
INTEREST EARNED
3,562.50
37,809.10
120,000.00
82,190.90
31.5%
SCORE
73,688.98
116,000.00
42,311.02
63.5%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
8.24
2,976.99
3,000.00
23.01
992%
PROCEEDS FROM BOND SALE
2,820.54
(2,820.54)
LOAN REPAYMENT
411.76
48,587.83
(48,587.83)
OTHER
725.13
9,657.05
2,000.00
(7,657.05)
482.9%
CONNECTION CHARGES
1,555.00
0.00
(1,555.00)
TOTAL
211,497.75
2,507,036.67
3,101,300.00
594,263.33
80.8%
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER/FUND
REFUSE
55,615.23
375,394.67
376,640.00
1,245.33
99.7%
WATER
67,808.82
643,821.22
960,715.00
316,893.78
67.0%
SEWER
53,765.09
1,209,943.04
3,142,249.00
1,932,305.96
38.5%
TOTAL
177,189.14
2,229,158.93
4,479,604.00
2,250,445.07
49.8% •
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
*CMO purchase anticapted payback is 4.332 years with a yield of 7.328%
This instrument receives payments monthly and depending on speed of payment of
mortgagages the yield could increase or decrease
** A GNMA with fixed maturity but has a call date of 8/12/97
* ** Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp w/ floating rate (floor of 5.0 %)
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
October 18,1994
•
Date
Date
Interest
Of
Of
Institution
Description
Rate
Purchase
Maturity
Amount
-- ----- - - - - --
TREAS BONDS
------ -- ----
644136
------ - - - - -- - - -
7.18%
--- ----- - - - - --
12/12/91
----- - -- - ---
2/15/2001
-- ------- - - - - --
373,500.00
TREAS BONDS
644137
7.13%
12/12/91
10/15/98
307,312.50
Firstate
41- 1214999 -8
3.70%
12/30/92
12/30/93
500,000.00
Smith Barney
CMO 80AP9
7.380%
2/15/93
5/1/2018
167,173.75
Smith Barney
GNMA865M7
7.363%
2/15/93
8/10/2002
128,077.78
Smith Barney
31 400 S H 7
5.00%
12/30/93
03/10/00
300,071.92
Firstate
41 1218148
4.65%
10/13/94
12/15/94
200,000.00
Smith Barney
999919 zu 0
4.50%
10/13/94
10/27/94
2,864,148.36
Citizens Bank
29796
4.30%
11/10/94
01/12/95
300,000.00
• Citizens Bank
29798
4.60%
11/10/94
02/16/95
300,000.00
Citizens Bank
29788
4.60%
11/10/94
03/16/95
400,000.00
Citizens Bank
29790
4.60%
11/10/94
04/13/95
500,000.00
Citizens Bank
29792
4.60%
11/10/94
05/11/95
200,000.00
' $6,540,284.31
*CMO purchase anticapted payback is 4.332 years with a yield of 7.328%
This instrument receives payments monthly and depending on speed of payment of
mortgagages the yield could increase or decrease
** A GNMA with fixed maturity but has a call date of 8/12/97
* ** Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp w/ floating rate (floor of 5.0 %)
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, October 18, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 5:30 p.m. with the following
members present: Glenn Matejka, Roger Gilmer, Bill Craig and Chairman Gruett.
Members Absent: Craig Lenz, April Brandt and Dean Wood. Also present: Jim Marko,
Building Official, Brenda Ewing, Planning Coordinator and G. Barry Anderson, City
Attorney.
2. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING DATED SEPTEMBER
20,1994
Mr. Matejka made a motion to approve the minutes dated September 20, 1994, seconded
by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION OF 10 ACRES OF PROPERTY
LOCATED ON HWY 7 E. REQUESTED BY LARRY FRASER, CENTURY 21
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:32 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4722 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. the
request is for the purpose of considering a petition of annexation requested by Mr.
Robert Barwick, to annex 10.75 acres located on Hwy 7 East.
Mr. Larry Fraser, Century 21, representing Mr. Barwick, commented on the
location of the annexation for the purpose of constructing a 46 unit Americlnn
motel on the property. He stated next month he will be asking to rezone the
property to C -4.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing explained the annexation lams and the
lengthening of the process. Discussion followed on the location of the city
boundary.
Building Official Jim Marko stated the request complies with the comprehensive
plan and the land use is appropriate. He explained the infrastructure will be
handled at the city council level.
City Attorney G. Barry Anderson commented on the governmental process. He
stated the developer will be proceeding with the soil testing at their own risk until
November 10, 1994, the date the State Municipal Board will act on the request.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94 0
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Matejka the hearing closed
at 5:45 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the annexation.
Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY TREATMENT CENTER FOR
ADDITION TO GROUP HOME ON FRANKLIN AVE.
Building Official Jim Marka stated the item was withdrawn as the addition will
be constructed to meet the codes.
c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
MCLEOD COUNTY TREATMENT CENTER'BETHANY BAPTIST CHURCH
TO PLACE GROUP HOME IN R -2 DISTRICT
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5:46 p m. with the reading of publication
# 4723 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit requested by
McLeod County Treatment Inc.Bethany Baptist Church to change use of building
located at 800 Grove Street.
Mr. Tom Price, consultant and therapist for the Treatment Program, explained the
use of the proposed shelter home for McLeod County children ages 6 -16 years
old. He stated the shelter is licensed by the Dept. of Human Services and
explained the length of stay is short term of 3 to 60 days. The children are
referred to the shelter by a social worker for a safe place to stay Mr. Price
explained they want to work with the neighbors as a good neighbor.
Mr. Steve Fitzloff, 820 Grove St., commented on the handout "Shelter Home
Information' and voiced his concern with the use of the facility regarding the
individuals placed there to live. He is concerned for his family. Mr. Fitzloff also
stated he contacted the police department and received information on the number
of calls they make to the other group homes
Mr. Dick Jensen, 216 Linden Ave., also shared concerns about the proposed use
and how that would possibly affect his family and the neighborhood. His other
concern was of the resale of surrounding property and how this use would affect
the values of the neighboring homes.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the licensing of the facility and the
zoning requirements according to state law.
2 0
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMNIISSION MINUTES
10/18/94
Discussion followed on the increasing need for this type of facility and the land
use.
Ms. Jill Kloeckel, Director of McLeod County Treatment Center, stated the home
will be for children placed by the Dept. of Human Resources not the Dept. of
Corrections as is the case in the other group homes in Hutchinson. She explained
the children placed in this shelter are abused or need a safe place to live outside
of their homes. This is a transition step to a foster home.
Mr. Warren Sytsma, property owner in the area, had concerns with the facility
developing into more than the shelter being explained tonight.
Mr. Price explained the focus is on children only. He stated any other use would
be by another conditional use permit request. Mr. Price also addressed the police
calls explaining they were, for the most part, russets between residents themselves.
The supervision is 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. He stated the children are never
unsupervised inside or outside and the children are from the Hutchinson/McLeod
County area not the Twin Cities area.
• Ms. Deb Fitzloff, 820 Grove Street, expressed concerns with the information on
the letter and asked for corrected information.
E
Mr. Grant Knutson, Chairman of the McLeod County Treatment Center board,
suggested he set up an informational meeting with neighboring property owners
and postpone the public hearing to November.
Mr. Ray Otte, 875 Lynn Rd., commented on concerns of the land use and the site
plan if changes are made.
Ms. Mary Burger, neighboring property owner, presented a list of questions the
neighbors would like addressed.
Mr. Craig made a motion to continue the hearing to November after an
informational meeting is held which is to be coordinated by Grant Knutson and
Steve Fitzloff. Seconded by Mr. Matejka the motion carried unanimously.
3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94 0
d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
RICHARD DESENS TO CONSTRUCT A 6700 SQ. FT. ADDITION TO NEW
DIMENSION PLATING
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:30 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4724 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit submitted by Mr.
Richard Desens for a 6700 sq. ft. addition to New Dimension Plating for
manufacturing space.
Mr. Desens, New Dimension Plating, commented on the addition and the timeline
he has set.
Building Official Jim Marka stated the right of way is to be dedicated and the
easements to the west of the property are to be coordinated. He stated the land
use is appropriate in the I -1 district.
Mr. Gilmer moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the hearing closed
at 6:40 p.m. Mr. Gilmer made a motion to recommend approval of the request
subject to the staff recommendations also including the dedication of right of way
and granting the necessary easements- Seconded by Mr. Matejka the motion
carried unanimously.
e) CONSIDERATION OF PETITION TO VACATE EASEMENTS ON LOTS IN
ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS PLAT REQUESTED BY DR. H. CHRIS REMUCAL
AND DR. MICHAEL MERCK
Chairman Gruen opened the hearing at 6:41 p m with the reading of publication
#4725 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994, and
Tuesday, October 11, 1994. The request is for the purpose of considering a
petition to vacate easements on lots in Island View Heights plat as requested by
Dr. H. Chris Remucal and Dr. Michael Merck.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing explained the request and stated the city staff
has no objection to the request.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Gilmer the hearing closed
at 6:45 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the vacation of
easements. Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
4 0
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94
CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT IN ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS PLAT
REQUESTED BY DR. H. CHRIS REMUCAL AND DR. MICHAEL MERCK
Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the lot split, seconded by Mr.
Matejka the motion carried unanimously.
f) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION
10.08 REGULATING ANTENNA HEIGHT
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:47 p.m. with the reading of publication
44726 as published the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering an amendment to the zoning ordinance
Section 10.08 regulating antenna height.
Building Official Marka commented on the most recent language and the attempt
by staff to permit antennas. He stated City Attorney Barry Anderson is
comfortable with the language.
Mr. Doug Brown stated he is comfortable with the wording as presented. Mr.
Doug Hedin stated he also approves of the language.
Mr. Craig made a motion to continue the hearing until the commission can review
the language in ordinance form. Seconded by Mr. Matejka the motion carried
unanimously.
g) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS AND
DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON HWY 15 AND
NORTH HIGH DRIVE FOR PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:55 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4727 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994, and
Tuesday, October 11, 1994. The request is for the purpose of considering a
petition to vacate easements on property located on the corner of Hwy 15 N and
North High Dr., 1201 Main St N., for construction of convenience store.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the request as advertized and
explained the driveway access easement is a private easement. He explained the
utility and drainage easement can be acted on by the planning commission. Mr.
Marka stated the site plan meets the parking requirements and the buffering
requirements.
9
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94 0
Mr. Nordy Nelson, neighboring property owner, questioned the drainage to the
south. Mr. Marka explained there will be on site ponding and restrictive flow
running through the ditch. The city will provide Mr. Nelson with the engineering
calculations.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Matejka the hearing closed
at 7:01 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the vacation of
utility and drainage easement. Seconded by Mr. Matejka the motion carried
unanimously.
h) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RICE
BUILDING SYSTEMS INC. FORCONSTRUCTION OF CARWASH LOCATED
AT 1016 HWY 15 S.
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7:02 p.m. with the reading of publication
44729 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit requested by Mr.
John Rice, Rice Building Systems, for the construction of a carwash to be located
at 1016 Hwy 15 S.
Mr. John Rice, Rice Building Systems, commented on the proposal and location
of the carwash.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing explained the convenience store is permitted
in the C -4 district. The hearing is for the carwash proposed.
Building Official Jim Marka stated the developer has obtained professional
services for this development. He commented on the drainage restrictions and the
traffic flow.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Gilmer the hearing closed
at 7:09 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the request
subject to meeting staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Gilmer the motion
carried unanimously.
4. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
6 •
HUTCHINSON PLANNING CONL\USSION MINUTES
10/18/94
5. NEW BUSINESS
a) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO CHANGE STREET NAMES IN
FAIRWAY ESTATES PLAT
Planning Coordinator Ewing explained the request by staff to change the street
names in the Fairway Estates plat. Building Official Marka stated the developer
is aware of the over site.
IVir. Craig made a motion to approve the request, seconded by Mr. Matejka the
motion carried unanimously_
b) DISCUSSION TO CHANGE STREET NAME FROM ROBERTS ROAD SOUTH
TO TERRACE DR. S.W. AND IN PARKSIDE 2ND ADDITION FOR BARLEY
LANE TO BARLEY STREET S.W.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the need to change the street
name and the E91 I emergency services clarification. She explained the new grid
system for street numbering. Building Official Jim Marka stated Roberts Rd runs
both east /west and north/south. He commented as the property to the south is
developed there will be problems with the numbering. Discussion followed on the
emergency services request.
Mr. Jerry Jones, 610 Roberts Rd., voiced concerns with the change and stated he
asked the police department if they had a problem finding residents in that area.
Mr. Jones stated this would be his fourth address change which creates an huge
inconvenience for the homeowners involved.
Mr. Dean Hueber, 620 Roberts Rd., commented on the resident's concerns and
presented a petition signed by the affected homeowners.
Mr. Marka commented on the quadrants in the city and the extension of the road.
Discussion followed on the appropriate place to begin the change. Staff was
directed to meet with the property owners present and list pros and cons.
Mr. Matejka moved to refer the matter to staff, seconded by Mr. Gilmer the
motion carried unanimously.
7
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94 0
Ms. Ewing pointed out the request for another name change in Parkside 2nd
Addition from Barley Lane to Barley St. S.W. Mr. Matejka moved to approve the
change, seconded by Mr. Craig the motion carried unanimously.
C) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE CHANGING
RIGHT OF WAY SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the request to change setback
requirements in the residential districts. She reviewed a list of pros and cons as
compiled by staff. Discussion followed on street width and the planning of
developments. The consensus of the planning commission is to direct staff to
discuss the request further and possibly contact the assessor regarding tax
questions.
d) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 8.08
REGARDING OVERCROWDING OF DRBLLINGS
Building Official Jim Marka explained the process and research staff used to
amend the ordinance. Discussion followed on the review of mobile home parks
regularly. It is the consensus of the planning commission to pursue the ordinance
and request a legal opinion. is
e) DISCUSSION OF ANNEXATION REQUESTED BY DAN COWGER IN LYNN
TWP.
Ms. Ewing commented on the request to annex property in Lynn Twp and the
fact there will be a public hearing for this annexation in November. She stated
planning staff recommends the property to the west also be developed thus
aligning the road from the Island View Heights plat to make one intersection at
Ulm Ave. Mr. Marka state the Cowgers are interested in city commitment to
provide services.
f) DISCUSSION OF URBAN BOUNDARY MAP IN ACOMA TWP.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing explained there will be discussion with
Acoma Twp. residents at the November meeting regarding the urban boundary
map and the 200 plus acres requested for annexation by staff. Building Official
Jim Marka commented on the orderly annexation process changes since the
previous meeting with Acoma Twp. officials.
8
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/18/94
e) DISCUSSION OF SURVEY REGARDING F.E.M.A. MITIGATION OF
NATURAL DISASTER
Jim Marka commented on the survey information for flood plain management.
h) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Mr. Marka commented on an informative meeting on the Hwy 7 corridor to be
promoted by H.C.D.C.
Mr. Marka commented a revision to the municipal code regarding the demolition
ordinance.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
0
9
HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
MINUTES
'OCTOBER 31, 1994
Meeting called to order by Chairman Dave Skaar at 7:45 p.m..
Members present: Chairman Dave Skaar, Joe Dooley and Dennis Kahl.
Members absent: Tim Miller, Jim Faber and Mayor Marlin Torgerson.
City Staff present: Doug Meier.
Guests present: Tom Parker and Tim Eakins.
Meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m..
Next Meeting scheduled for November 28, 1994, 7:30 p.m. at the Airport Lobby.
Report submitted by Doug Meier.
0
// -A. (-,�)
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 18, 1994
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: NOON CONFERENCE ROOM CITY CENTER
Vice - Chairman Don Erickson called the meeting to order.
Members present: Tammy Wendlandt, Joel Kraft and Shirley
Wass with John Paulsen arriving shortly after roll call.
Members absent- none.
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
There being no additions or corrections, Don Erickson moved
that the minutes be approved as submitted. Shirley Wass
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
III. CONSIDERATION OF STATUS OF ACCOUNTS FOR HRA GENERAL
FUND AND PARK TOWERS PROJECT OPERATING FUNDS
Disbursements and operating budgets were reviewed. Don
Erickson moved that the financial statements be approved as
submitted. Joel Kraft seconded and the motion carried
. unanimously.
IV. DEAN OTTERSON, REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF ST. CLOUD HRA
Dean Otterson reported St. Cloud's HRA mission statement is
...to effectively and efficiently serve the Citizens of St.
Cloud through affordable housing programs. Their HRA Board
goal is to work toward agency self- sufficiency and programs
that lead toward self - sufficiency for low and moderate
income people with a staff of around 30 people. Once a
month, Dean meets with representatives of the HRA Board and
the planning commission to discuss community planning
issues. St. Cloud HRA issues single family revenue bonds
for first time homebuyers -these bonds are considered conduit
financing and are not counted as debt but do count toward
the 10 million of a City's bonds that are bank qualified.
Two problems that first time homebuyers face are education
on home buying and lack of downpayment. The bond issue can
be structured to help provide downpayment assistance as a 0%
deferred loan, payable upon sale of house. The HRA, upon
City request is planning a downtown housing /retail essential
function bond project and has just begun the planning stages
for another essential function bond Project Take Pride.
V. PARK TOWERS PROJECT
1. Currently there are no vacancies.
2. 1992 Ciap Project Update- the stucco is about half done.
A revised budget will be submitted to HUD showing all monies
obligated for this grant for stucco repair. Computers will
then.be budgeted for in the 1993 CIAP budget.
If the weather permits, our goal is to closeout this grant
by year end.
3. 1993 CIAP Project Update -the elevator work is scheduled
to begin by the first of the year.
4. 1994 CIAP Project - Architect Contract. After review,
Tammy Wendlant moved to approved the contract presented with
compensation for work required set at a firm fixed price of
$21,000. Shirley Wass seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
5. Updated Admission Policy -Local Preferences -Hud has
commented on changes that need to be made; this changes will
be presented at the November Board meeting.
VI. TAMMY WENDLANDT- UPDATE ON GRANT APPLICATION FOR PARK
TOWERS GENERATOR
Tammy updated the HRA Board on the $50,000 grant request
that was submitted for the Park Towers generator; the
Federal Home Loan Bank will review the application by
October 15th and we should hear by December 15th on the
outcome.
VII. SMALL CITIES GRANT APPLICATION
Connie Mangan informed the Board that the Small Cities grant
was submitted to DTED on September 30.
VIII. RENTAL REHAB
VALLEY VISTA
Connie Mangan updated the Board that the bid specs are going
out incorporating the current wage rates. Valley Vista is
in eastern McLeod County and Park Towers is considered
western McLeod County. The project is estimated to cost
a total of $600,000 with $500,000 coming from the Home
Rental Rehab program and $100,000 coming from the Valley
Vista reserve fund.
1065 JEFFERSON
Mark Fratzske has a purchase agreement on the property.
MHFA is considering funding this rehab under the Targeted
Home Program at a cost of $28,000 /unit but would like the
HRA to administer the rehab on their behalf for no fee.
Board consensus was that we would like to be reimbursed for
admin time costs,from the owner if possible. Connie will
check with MHFA about charging the owner for HRA
administrative time spent on this project.
IX. CENTURY COURT APARTMENTS- UPDATE
Brian Solsrud from Augusta Housing Corporation sent a
colored rendering showing increase of brick veneer and
indicated with the needstto gettbackatow will
us .
. Page 3
HRA Regular Board Meeting, October 18, 1994
regarding an increased budget for more diverse landscaping
plan.
X. POLICY REGARDING DEVELOPER'S REQUEST FOR CITY OF
HUTCHINSON INVOLVEMENT IN A PROJECT PROPOSAL
The Policy was reviewed; as the policy is written the
HRA /HCDC review committee is to review all proposals and
needs to be clarified and written to reflect HRA involvement
in only housing proposals. The approval of the policy was
tabled until the next meeting.
XI. FOR BOARD INFORMATION
1. HRA will have a booth at the Fairgrounds on November
20th from 1 -4; Awareness '94 Celebrating Community & Family.
2. If any Commissioners are interested in attending the
NAHRO Community Development Session on November 3, please
contact the Director.
3. An MHFA Focus Group on Affordable Housing will be held
on Friday, October 28; the Director plans to attend.
XII. STATUS OF 1995 WORKPLAN
John, Joel and Jean have met and started working on the 1995
workplan. The housing study is being planned for January,
1995 for both rental and home ownership. The transfer of
MHFA rehab programs from HCDC to HRA may be in jeopardy
because MHFA may not release any more funding to HCDC
because the 1991 -1993 program has not yet been closed out.
That means that HCDC is behind about one year in the
administration of the 1993 -1995 program. Further discussion
with MHFA about administration of these programs need to
take place; the Director will write a letter to MHFA stating
our interest in administering these programs.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, John Paulsen declared the
meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director
Tammy Wendlan t, Secretary Treasurer
0
0
HUTCHINSON HOUSING, INC.
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
OCTOBER 18, 1994
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER: CONFERENCE ROOM CITY CENTER
President Don Erickson called the meeting to order. Members
present: Joel Kraft, Shirley Wass, Tammy Wendlandt and John
Paulsen.
II. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR BOARD MEETING
SEPTEMBER 20, 1994
There being no additions or corrections, Shirley Wass moved
that the minutes be approved as submitted. Joel Kraft
seconded and the motion carried unanimously. •
III. FINANCIAL REPORT
The financial report was reviewed. The loan to Hutchinson
HRA for the Prince of Peace relocation and land acquisition
has been repaid. John Paulsen moved that the financial
statement be approved as submitted. Joel Kraft seconded and
the motion carried unanimously.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Don Erickson declared the
meeting adjourned.
Recorded by Jean Ward, Executive Director
Tammy Wen lan t, Secretary Treasurer
1
0
0
0
Hutchinson Library Board Meeting
October 24, 1994
Members Present: Mary Henke, Dolores Brunner, Joyce Beytien,
Roy Johnsen, Sue Munz, Paul Wright
Members Absent: Bill Scherer, Paul Berg, Kay Peterson
The minutes from the September meeting were reviewed.
The next board meeting will be November 28 at 4:30 P.M.
John Houlahan and K. Matson from Pioneerland Library System
were present at this meeting. They are meeting with all
library boards in the system this fall.
John, Director of PLS, presented the attached information/
discussion outline. All of the items listed were presented
and discussed.
Meeting was adjourned. Joyce Beytien,Secretary
Please note: The next library board meeting will be Nov. 28, 1994 at 4:30 PN.
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
John M. Houlahan, Director
i u /dy/ °r`j
410 SW Fdth Street Willmar, MN 56201 -3298
Phone No. 612/235 -3162
Fax. No. 6121235-3160
PLS ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF/LOCAL BOARDS MEETING
1. Local board roles 0- .
A Building/facility
B. Strategic planning (identifying patron needs and developing service and funding plans
to meet those needs)
C. Budget process
1. Help determine budget
2. Communicate budget needs to city/county officials
D. Head librarian evaluation
2. System organization and personnel
A. PLS Board and its committee structure
B. Service Center 4.9 FTE
1. ILL
2. Reference
3. Access to PLANET & MINITEX
4. Processing
C. Administrative office S FTE
1. Personnel
2. Management
3. Bookkeeping
4. Telecommunications
D. ECSU delivery
E. Rotating collections
F. State/federal budget
(lOn� dIS +4nCG ec0tz)
3. Current projects
A Agreement amendments
B. Personnel study /policies/benefits
C. Combined service/administrative center
- 4. Automation
A CD -ROM catalog
B. CD -ROM products
C. Fax network
D. INTERNET
E. On -line PAC /circulation systems
5. ADA
6. Grants 7. Local/system relations ( What's on your mind ?) 0
•
RESOLUTION NO. 10135
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
102 Water Meters $
7,548.(0
New Installation - Resale
Water
Yes
Water Pro
5/8 X 3/4
Chlorine System Eng.
9,000.(0
New System Design
Water
Yes
Rust E &I Eng.
& Specs.
• The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
Date Approved: November 22, 1994
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
PURPOSE
DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
-A, (1)
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• RESOLUTION NO. 10339
TRANSFERRING FUNDS FROM THE 1980 TAX INCREMENT DEBT
SERVICE FUND TO 1985, 1990, and 1992 TAX INCREMENT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT $221,786 is hereby transferred from the 1980 Tax Increment Debt
Service Fund and shall be distributed as follows:
1985 Tax Increment Debt Service Fund for the payment of bonds and
interest due $24,320.
1990 Tax Increment Debt Service Fund for the payment of bonds and
interest due $159,838.
1992 Tax Increment Debt Service Fund for the payment of bonds and
' interest due $37,628.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of November 1994.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 10343
• RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 10335
LETTING NO.5
PROJECT NO. 95 -05
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted November 7th, 1994, a report was prepared
by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of Harmony Lane and Lincoln Avenue by
construction of sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel base,
bituminous base and surfacing, and appurtenances. Said report was received by the Council on November
7th, 1994 and public hearing was set for November 22nd, 1994.
WHEREAS, due to time constraints, request is made to reschedule said public hearing for Tuesday,
December 13th, 1994 at 8:00 pm.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the
assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $322,400.00.
2. The public hearing on such proposed improvements shall be rescheduled to the 13th day of December,
1994, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 8:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and
published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
isAdopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
Mayor
City Administrator
� -9, (3)
RESOLUTION NO. 10344
• RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 10337
LETTING NO. 7
PROJECT NO. 95 -07, 95 -08, 95 -09
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted November 7th, 1994, a report was prepared
by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of:
Project No. 95 -07: 5th Avenue NE from Bluff Street to Hwy. 15 South by construction of sanitary
sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel base,
bituminous base and surfacing, and appurtenances.
Project No. 95 -08: Prospect Street NE from Hwy. 7 East to 6th Avenue NE by construction of
sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel
base, bituminous base and surfacing, and appurtenances.
Project No. 95 -09: 6th Avenue NE from Bluff Street to East Terminus by construction of sanitary
sewer and services, watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel base,
bituminous base and surfacing, and appurtenances.
Said report was received by the Council on November 7th, 1994 and public hearing was set for November 22nd,
1994.
• WHEREAS, due to time constraints, request is made to reschedule said public hearing for Tuesday,
December 13th, 1994 at 8:00 pm.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the
assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $744,000.00.
2. The public hearing on such improvements shall be rescheduled, to the 13th day of December, 1994, in
the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 8:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published
notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
Mayor
City Administrator
Z/ -�5, (Z/ )
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• RESOLUTION NO. 10345
•
TRANSFERRING $65,000 FROM LIQUOR FUND TO
GENERAL FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
THAT $65,000 is hereby transferred from the Liquor Fund
to the General Fund.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of November 1994
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
> APPLICATION PORb "UI MMUV"':..- PERMIT
To
._CITY COUNCIL
.._..I........ .... ..._.._ _ . __ .. _._ ................__ ....................... .... ..... _ ............... _ ............... ....
e/ th1.......C. I. T.Y. ....................... _... _...__.._.of... HITfCHINSON __.. _. .. . ............................... _. _ ........_._ ......... in the County of
......
........... .......... MC.... LE Q. Q. ................... ................................. , State of Minnesota.:
The underetd,ud,owner wham name and address .ia....F!x: . l�!.``5...,.ak.l�.�!^?5. .... tf! ^..E.../..!!V..
o..... R�!tEC its $�-. E :!,� ,t�tlr,?SM ..._. he a L!u ora PLOW AND
.• , ,._....... f .. ..... hereby pp f permit t o .......... ...............................
REMOVE SNOW WITH t �.i .... sO!+^ .P..rt?E..__..� cwFR�Cj •toyw`..........I ...............
UP M that otrfain tract of land described as follows- Lot .................. ..............................: Block............. ...............................
plat. oraddition ................ : ................................................. .......................... ; address .................................... ...................... ... ................... .............;
�i which to of the followtnp st" and area; width................. ._ .......................feet; length ... ............. . ............. .. _ .... feet;
0 a
e.
WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS
Whrbd ...« .................. ........................................................ : ............. __ ..... _ .......................................................... ;
and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all
matertats which shall be used shall comply with the plans and apect/leattona therefor herewith submitted
dnd with all the ordtnanees of said......,, ... ...... CITY OF ..HUCCHINSON _........
......................... ...............................
9" applloable thereto.
dpplioant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and to the amounts specified as
naftm
lilt' '
e. ,x --
Owner
Nov
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
-�
APPLICATION FOR_sH2.w_ REMOVAL
--- - ---------- PERMIT
To as ........ jTY COUNCIL
............................... — ............... . . . .. .................................................. . .... . . ................... .................... . ............. I ......... I ................ .............
of ths ...... ... CITY ........... . .............. . ...... ........ ....... NSON
.......................... . . . . . . ................................................... In the County of
..................... mc .. MOD........._........... ............................... State of Minnesota:
The Un4erstine I d owner where name and address .1a ............. S7
............. ...... ...
.... Allen .. . . ............................................................ ........ hereby appli"fopapermijeo. PLOW AND
7 ....... I ...............
WT�j 1) 0 1- , I
" Upon that certain tract of land described as follows:
Block......... .............................. ..... ;
plator addition ............... : .......... —.1 ............................ .. ............... ; addrets ..... .............................................................................
which to of the followtnjf #In and area, width ..................... ............ ............... . fedt; lenith ... ...... ....................... .. . . . feet;
�171IN THE CITY LIMITS
area ...... . ... ....... . .. . . . . ........ I ........................... I ...........
and hereby agrees that, in case such permit Is Granted, that all work which shall be done and all
m4tertals which #halt be used *hall comply with the plans and speclfi&atons therefor herewith submitted
and With all the ordinances of said......._ CITY ... O.F...HUI`C1i.1.NS.ON ............................................................................... ........
4ppliftble thereto.
Jppltoanf further airms to pay lea or assessments at the time and In the amounts specified as
.. ........... ...... ........... . U.Q...Q.Q ....... . . ................................................................... - ......................................... I .....................................................................
I
......................
Owner
M T I N I -N
mry 18 IN I
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
c
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: Nov 22nd. 1994
TO:
Mayor
& City
Council
FROM:
Water
Billing
Department
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for the month of Nov
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of Nov. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday,
Nov 28th, 1994 at Noon.
is
tCity Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax(612)234 -4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN55350 -3097
(612) 587 -2975
Fax (612) 234 -4240
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
t (612) 587 -2242
Fax (612) 587 -6427
3 -030- 0646 -082
3- 080- 0250 -041
Jack Krippner
Vance Haugen
•
646 2nd Ave SE
250 5th Ave NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
646 2nd Ave SE
250 5th Ave NW
128.55
129.51
CC: Vicky Klabunde
Rt 2 Box 218
Brownton MN 55312
3- 120 - 0055 -034
Sayles Waldrath
3- 045 - 0439 -021
55 9th Ave NE
Raymond Ladd
Hutchinson MN 55350
439 3rd Ave SE
55 9th Ave NE
Hutchinson MN 55350
187.52
439 3rd Ave SE
134.85
3- 130 - 0136 -041
3- 045- 0607 -089
Miles Willhite
Dan Menard
11th Ave NE
607 3rd Ave SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 553350
136 11th Ave NE
607 3rd Ave SE
199.05
115.92
Promises 12 -10 -94
CC: Kurt Rischmiller
605 3rd Ave SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 210 - 0105 -046
Mike Carter
3- 065 - 0546 -071
105 Adams St
•
Charles Fairbanks
Hutchinson MN 55350
546 4th Ave SE
105 Adams St
Hutchinso MN 55350
128.66
546 4th Ave SE
Cc: Hutch Iron & Metal
107.03
304 1st Ave SE
CC: Billet /Larson
Hutchinson MN 55350
640 Adams St
Hutchinson MN 55350
3 -210- 0551 -033
3- 080 - 0116 -082
Michael Keeler
Daryl Willett
551 Adams St
116 5th Ave NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
551 Adams St
116 5th Ave NW
177.59
137.37
Promises 11 -30 -94
3 -227- 0711 -011
3 -080- 0221 -001
Randy Jaster
Craig Hardel
711 Arizona St
221 5th Ave NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
711 Arizona St
221 5th Ave NW
92.16
130.31
CC: Triple H & O
Promises 12 -02 -94
300 Litchfield Ave
Willmar MN 56201
•
.
3 -275- 0472 -011
Eugene Jaenisch
3 -735- 0336 -011
Dale Schlueter
Jeff Hart
472 California St
336 Monroe St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
707 Shady Ridge Rd
472 California St
336 Monroe St
CC: Bruce Crosby
98.21
144.17
Promises 12 -01 -94
3 -735- 0540 -031
3- 275- 0486 -054
James Deragon
Vance Woller
540 Monroe St
486 California St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Monroe St
486 California St
214.08
144.72
Promises 11 -30 -94
Promises 11 -28 -94
3 -765- 0810 -092
David Laine
3- 530 - 0712 -021
810 Oak St
Vince Jahner
Hutchinson MN 55350
712 Hilltop Dr
810 Oak St
Hutchinson MN 55350
128.97
712 Hilltop Dr
Promises 12 -01 -94
263.43
CC: James Schlagal
3- 800- 0575 -012
656 Juul Rd
Rodney Markgraf
Hutchinson MN 55350
575 Peterson Cir
Hutchinson MN 55350
•
575 Peterson Cir
3 -560- 0443 -012
208.14
David Pfeiler
443 James St
3- 815 - 0531 -071
Hutchinson MN 55350
Martin Koepp Jr
443 James St
531 Prospect St
70.00
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 12 -01 -94
531 Prospect St
134.64
3- 655- 0680 -092 3 -855- 0380 -001
Joseph Jorgenson Heritage Center
680 Lindy Ln 380 School Rd N
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
680 Lindy Ln 380 School Rd N
118.18 48.27
3- 680 - 0877 -011
3- 870- 0707 -071
Sharon Sauter
Jeff Hart
877 Main St N
707 Shady Ridge Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
877 Main St N
707 Shady Ridge Rd
96.53
181.74
CC: Bruce Crosby
• 879 Main St N
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 12 -01 -94
1- 395- 0405 -023
Kurt Rischmiller •
605 3rd Ave SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
405 Franklin St S
23.08
2- 035 - 0505 -055
Olivia Rodriguges
1066 Trinity St
Eagle Pass TX 78852
505 2nd Ave SW
127.43
CC: Mike Mooney
65 Game Farm Rd
Maple Plain MN 55358
2 -585- 0572 -072
Peggy McKimm
520 School Rd S
Hutchinson MN 55350
572 Juul Rd
68.94
CC: Mark Betker
705 Glen St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 11 -28 -94 •
L
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612) 587 -5151 Sheet Lof I
CONTRACTOR: S. J. Louis Construction, Inc. LETTING NO. 12 PROJECT NO. 94 -28
DRESS: 7284 Co Rd 138, PO Box 1373, PROJECT LOCATION: Fairway Estates
St Cloud MN56302 -1373
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Reduction in unit price for 3" perforated pipe drain.
Item No
Spec Ref
Item Name
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Amoun
1
2502
YPF Perf Nne Drain/Inc, Coarse Eiter Ar�egatc
L'n Ft
3300
S.50
S1,650,00
Md Price of $5.00/Lin Ft mduced to S4.50/Un F0
TOTAL DLCREASE ITEMS
-S1.650,00
NET4?4GRF'r"..SFDECREASE
-S1,650.00
In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount of- $1.650.00.
addfdeduct. An extension of 0 days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date was September 16. 1994.
and now has been adjusted to - - -- . 19— .
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
PREVIOUS
ADDITIONS /DEDUCTIONS
THIS
ADDff40N4DEDUCTION
TOTAL
$494,94//4.20 $163.40 - $1,650.00 $493,130.80
APPROVED: 1G-�,ev l/,�Y -�n��
Contractor
ATED:
APPROVED:
Mayor
DATED:
APPROVED:
Dir9cto o igin ring
DATED: I / G �C
APPROVED:
City Administrator r
DATED: 'G
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 612 587 -5151 Sheet -L—of 1
CONTRACTOR: Juul Contracting Company LETTING NO. 3 1PROJECTNO. 94 -03
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 189, Hutchinson, MN 55350 PROJECT LOCATION: Lakewood Drive
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Reduction in Unit Price for 3" Perforated Pipe Drain
Item No
Spec Ref
Item Name
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Amoun
DECREASE ITEMS:
1
2502
3" PE Perf Pipe Drain /Inc. Coarse Filter Agg.
Lin Ft
3240
$0.70
- $2,268.00
(Bid Price of $5.15/LF Reduced to $4.45 /LF)
TOTAL DECREASE ITEMS
$2,268.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
$2,268.00
NET SSE /DECREASE
$2,268.00
In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount of $- 2.268.00.
add /deduct: An extension of 0 days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date was September 30.1994 .
and now has been adjusted to - - - -- . 19
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
PREVIOUS THIS
ADDITIONS /DEDUCTIONS frBD!44e?4 /DEDUCTION
TOTAL
$353,900.40 + $3,577.25 $2,258.00 $378,939.65
APPROVED: �iz .oGf
Contr or
DATED:
APPROVED:
Mayor
DATED:
APPROVED:
ector of Engmeerin
DATED: )I Ip F5
APPROVED:
City Administrator
DATED:
CHANGE ORDER NO. _ 1
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1 1 1 HASSAN ST SF_ HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612) 587 -5151 Sheet -1--of —1
CONTRACTOR: uul Contractin Com an LETTING NO. 5 PRO CT NO. 94 -05
DRESS: P.O. Box 189, Hutchinson, MN 55350 PRO CT LOCATION: Island View Hei hts
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Reduction in Unit Price for 3" Perforated Pi Drain
Item No
S c Ref
Item Name
Unit
uanti
Unit Price
Amoun
DECREASE ITEMS:
2502
3" PE Perf Pipe Drain /Inc. Coarse Filter Agg.
Lin Ft
4420
$0.50
-$2,210.00
(Bid Price of $4.05 /LF Reduced to$3.55 /LF)
TOTAL DECREASE ITEMS
-$2,210.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
$2,210.00
NET 1NePcE'k6E /DECREASE
$2 210.00
In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount of $- 2.210.00.
add /deduct. An extension of 0 days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date was and
now has been adjusted to -- - - - - -- . 19 =.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
PREVIOUS
ADDITIONS /DEDUCTIONS
THIS
AAF/DEDUCTION
TOTAL
$353,837.60 $ 0.00 1 . $2,210.00 $351,627.60
APPROVED:���
Contractor
DATED: / —/0 —9
APPROVED:
Mayor
DATED:
PROVED:
hector o En tneerin
DATED: p G 4
APPROVED:
City Administrator
DATED:
W —Lr--
CHANGE ORDER NO. _1
-
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612) 587.5151 Sheet _ _of _1_
CONTRACTOR: Juul Contracting Comeany I LETTING NO. 8 1 PROJECT NO. 94.09
ADDRESS: P.O. Box 189, Hutchinson, MN 55350 1 PROJECT LOCATION: Arch Street
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Replace 12" the line crossing Arch Street
Item No
Spec Ref
Item Name
Unit
Quantity
Unit Price
Amoun
INCREASE ITEMS:
2503
12" Corr. PE Pipe Sewer (Smooth)
Lin Ft
168
$10.96
$1,841.28
TOTAL INCREASE ITEMS
$1,841.28
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
$1,841.28
NET INCREASE /BETAS£
$1,841.28
In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted in the amount of $ +1.841.28.
add /dedmt An extension of 0 days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date was November 1. 1994 .
and now has been adjusted to - -• - - -- . 19 — .
ORIGINAL CONTRACT
PREVIOUS
ADDITIONS /DEDUCTIONS
THIS
ADDITION /BEOi3C -440 —M
TOTAL
$128,734.50 1 $0.00 + $1,841.28 $130,575.78
APPROVED: -_Zl��'O t .rte
Contractor
DATED: i /-y'-.9
APPROVED:
Mayor
DATED:
APPROVED:
ire for of E sgi eringj
DATED: 0
APPROVED:
City Administrator
DATED:
C
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director of P.R.C.E.
DATE: 11 -16 -94
RE: Table & Chair Rental Elimination
At the November P.R.C.E. Advisory Board meeting, the following motion was
made and seconded with unanimous approval; the Board recommended the elimination
of renting tables and chairs to the public beginning January 1, 1995.
Discussion involved with the recommendation included:
• Elimination of tables /chairs from 1995 budget $5,000
• Failure to fund at an appropriate sustained level
• Desire to provide quality tables and chairs to facility rental groups
i.e. dry floor activities, internal usage.
• Ability to have a private rental source provide this service. i.e. Farm and
Home
Ciry Center
I l l Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax(612)234 -4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(612) 587 -2975
Fax(612)234 -4240
- P.imrd n q .,, „ .
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -2242
l�
Fax, 612)587 -6427
c
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MCLEOD
COUNTYTREATMENT CENTER /BETHANYBAPTIST CHURCHTO CHANGE USE
FROM CHURCH TO SHELTER HOME IN R -2 DISTRICT
Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning
Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect
to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On September 27, 1994, McLeod Treatment Programs Inc., submitted an application
fora conditional use permit to change use of building from a church to a shelter home
located at 880 Grove St. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 18, 1994, and continued to the next meeting
held on Tuesday, November 15, 1994, at which time there were neighboring property
owners present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published
in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use
permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It Is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit be denied based on the findings set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975 /'
(6 t 2) 587 -2242
Fax(612)234 -4240
Fax(612)234 -4240 T
Fa: 612)587 -6427
-Printed on recycled paper -
V
LINEN AVENUE
-
..M......
e. _ •r _ t
.. - •. ,.. W 239.00- .. ... ....... @.
sa
- '
+
, 1
I ••
BUILDING ' �'':••.,.... w
it1
0 • Ii f, � » • i .T II
1
II II
P c P" II
jvM
IF
•lry• ••� MI �tT I >x :.. II rl ••rl
• I I
II
GR4 yl
... »..w.« I V'
l.no q•g49 Pi •• l•r .
6 i ..
P R RN i�.
`+• 4 KI(y` �D/� VE S
I� '•. jjq .a..s,_'.'•.` �T�YICU•.Y�.T .. QND`.+i•.yl+..�'M+�+"
4 :?
.•, w
r
i
.... -
a.. ..
•"• II ..•. ..... II
•n
zn
i- I sNeo
J --
MOV3C
ue /rt3 NO 020 I
y
� n
n
BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY %:sW
H,NY BABTIST CHURCH 3j,,y
�., y���s'l""x••••rra..0u�hari+ I MN.r a•ql /•w« ml wrwr l•l w«l•M w+N
"'l" `'LOTS 1. 2. 19 AND 20, BLOCK 1 'R'�' n _ .. +�" •N nmr r.••. •M ,M• . «a fw
'l :[•F.M L•M l.r•f ••r u+ •N , +l •• ,N SNN
GINA M. BRA-NDT
BRETT D. AHNOLD
A]SO ADMITTED IN TFSAS \D N£..' YOHH
November 15, 1994
AR \TOLD & McDoivELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARK PLACE
HLTCHINsON, AfINNESOTA 55350 -2503
'C312' 587 -7575
Mr. James Marka
Building official
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street S.E.
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
FAX 912'587 -4098
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: State Licensed Facility
our File No. 3188 -88087
Dear Jim:
IsThis correspondence is a follow
week and my telephone conference
Commissioner Beverly Wangerin.
OF COUNSEL
WILLIAM w. CAMERON
RAYMOND 0. LALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5518
012 543-9000
FAX 612 50.5 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 53371
612 389-2214
FAY 612 389 -5506
up to our telephone call of last
this morning with McLeod County
I understand that an application
commission for the operation of a
operated in a R -2 designation he
would be licensed through the Stal
to 20 persons. The facility is
residence, but will hold youth fc
is pending before the planning
"Crisis" facility for youth to be
re in Hutchinson. The facility
:e of Minnesota and would hold up
not intended to be a long term
r a period of up to 72 hours.
Under the existing City Code, the City of Hutchinson has the
authority to conditionally permit the use of the property subject
to significant restrictions. Further, the planning commission
could recommend to the City Council that the facility not be
permitted at all but while a municipality has significant
discretion in making planning and zoning decisions, extremely
detailed findings should be made as to the inappropriateness of the
use.
The precise question posed to our office is whether state law has
any impact on the decision reached by the City of Hutchinson. I
have previously addressed this issue as it relates to state
licensed residential facilities and I believe you have a copy of my
opinion from 1988. However, under the facts of this case, where
the licensed facility will have as many as 20 people, the
provisions of Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd. 7 or Minn. Stat.
•CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MLNNESOTA STATE BA8 ASSOCIATION 4,6—,
— CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY Law SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
DAVID B. ARNOLD'
GARY D.X.DOMELL
STEVEN A.ANDER90N
O. HARRY AN'DEBSON
STEVEN A HOGE
LAURA R. ERBTLA-ND
DAVID A.BRUEGG£MA-SY
PAUL D- DOVE'•
81CRAHD G. MrGEE
CATHRYN D -REITER
GINA M. BRA-NDT
BRETT D. AHNOLD
A]SO ADMITTED IN TFSAS \D N£..' YOHH
November 15, 1994
AR \TOLD & McDoivELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARK PLACE
HLTCHINsON, AfINNESOTA 55350 -2503
'C312' 587 -7575
Mr. James Marka
Building official
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street S.E.
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
FAX 912'587 -4098
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Re: State Licensed Facility
our File No. 3188 -88087
Dear Jim:
IsThis correspondence is a follow
week and my telephone conference
Commissioner Beverly Wangerin.
OF COUNSEL
WILLIAM w. CAMERON
RAYMOND 0. LALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5518
012 543-9000
FAX 612 50.5 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 53371
612 389-2214
FAY 612 389 -5506
up to our telephone call of last
this morning with McLeod County
I understand that an application
commission for the operation of a
operated in a R -2 designation he
would be licensed through the Stal
to 20 persons. The facility is
residence, but will hold youth fc
is pending before the planning
"Crisis" facility for youth to be
re in Hutchinson. The facility
:e of Minnesota and would hold up
not intended to be a long term
r a period of up to 72 hours.
Under the existing City Code, the City of Hutchinson has the
authority to conditionally permit the use of the property subject
to significant restrictions. Further, the planning commission
could recommend to the City Council that the facility not be
permitted at all but while a municipality has significant
discretion in making planning and zoning decisions, extremely
detailed findings should be made as to the inappropriateness of the
use.
The precise question posed to our office is whether state law has
any impact on the decision reached by the City of Hutchinson. I
have previously addressed this issue as it relates to state
licensed residential facilities and I believe you have a copy of my
opinion from 1988. However, under the facts of this case, where
the licensed facility will have as many as 20 people, the
provisions of Minn. Stat. §462.357, Subd. 7 or Minn. Stat.
•CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MLNNESOTA STATE BA8 ASSOCIATION 4,6—,
— CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY Law SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. James Marka
November 15, 1994
Page 2
§462.357, Subd. 8, do not apply. Those provisions prohibit a city
from restricting the location of state licensed residential
facilities, under certain circumstances, where the facilities are
licensed for 16 or fewer persons. Since the facility now under
discussion exceeds the limits set for this protected class, it is
my opinion that these statutes do not apply. A copy of the statute
is enclosed for your information and review.
Therefore, it is my opinion that the Planning Commission and the
City Council have the authority to either reject the application or
impose reasonable conditions as requirements for permission to
operate the facility within the designated zone.
If you have any questions in connection with this opinion, please
contact me.
Very
G. garry Anderson
GBA:lm
0
9
is
Responses to questions of concerned neighbors of Bethany Baptist Church
0 1. What is an R -5 permit?
L]
A rule 5 license refers to permanent rules governing licensure of residential
treatment programs for children with severe emotional disturbance. (DHS
Minnesota Rules Chapter 9545, 9- 13 -94)
The shelter home will be licensed under rule 5, Chapter 9545.1045 shelter
services. Shelter services means "services provided during time - limited placements
of 90 days or less, to children who are in a behavioral or situational crisis, need
out -of -home placement in a protective environment, and have an immediate need
for services such as assessment, evaluation, or placement planning' (DHS MN Rules
Chapter 9545.1045 subpart 37).
A child with severe emotional disturbance refer to "a child who has an
emotional disturbance and who meets one of the following criteria:
1. the child has been admitted within the last three years or is at risk of being
admitted to inpatient treatment or residential treatment for an emotional disturbance;
or
2. the child is a Minnesota resident and is receiving inpatient treatment or
residential treatment for an emotional disturbance through the interstate compact;
or
3. the child has one of the following as determined by a mental health
professional
(i) psychosis or a clinical depression; or
(ii) risk of harming self or others as a result of an emotional disturbance; or
(iii) psychopathological symptoms as a result of being a victim of physical
or sexual abuse or of psychic trauma within the past year,
4. the child, as a result of an emotional disturbance, has significantly impaired
home, school, or community functioning that has lasted at least one year or that, in
the written opinion of a mental health professional, presents a substantial risk of
lasting at least one year. The term 'child with severe emotional disturbance" shall
be used only for purposed of county eligibility determinations. In all other written and
oral communication, case managers, mental health professionals, mental health
practitioners, and all other providers of mental health services shall use the term
"child eligible or mental health case management" in place of 'child with severe
emotional disturbance'. (Minnesota Comprehensive Children's Mental Health Act
245.487 through 245.4888)
McLeod Treatment Programs Shelter Home will accept children that qualify
for mental health case management under part 3 (iii) or part 4 only. Children who
qualify under part 3 (i) or (ii) will not be admitted.
1
2. Is R -5 permit (MN DHS Rule 5 licensure) permanent or does it need to
be renewed periodically? 0
Conditions of licensure (MN DHS Rule 5, Chapter 9545.0935) states that
no person, corporation, limited liability corporation, partnership, voluntary association,
controlling individual, or other organization can provide residential treatment services
to children with severe emotional disturbance unless licensed by the commissioner
under parts 9545.0905 to 9545.1125, according to the licensing requirements of
parts 9543.1000 to 9543.1060)
When an initial license is being issued to any facility, it shall remain in force
for up to one year. When a license is being renewed, it may be issued for a period of
up to two years, in the discretion of the commissioner of public welfare (MN DHS
Rule 5 9545.0920 subpart 1).
3. is a conditional use reviewed periodically? What else could this be
turned into?
Please direct this question to the city planning staff. Jim Marka or Brenda
Ewing
4. They have already mentioned the amount of room on the lots could
allow for expansion; we feel 20 residents would be overwhelming for this
peaceful neighborhood - how much larger could it become? With the
size change what else could change?
McLeod Treatment Programs have no plans for expansion.
5. Is McLeod Group Homes (McLeod Treatment Programs) a county run,
county funded entity or is this a private source?
McLeod Treatment Programs, Inc. is a private non - profit corporation. It is
governed by a Board of Directors that consists of Hutchinson and Glencoe community
members.
6. Is this a for - profit business? If not, what prevents It from being
contracted out to a private agency which would turn It into a for- profit
business?
As stated previously, MTP is a non - profit corporation. We do not believe that
services to troubled children should be a for profit venture and would not consider
that option.
2 0
7. Will anyone on the board live within the city limits of Hutchinson?
As stated previously, several of our Board Members and most of our staff are
members of the Hutchinson community.
8. Who has the final decision on who is admitted?
MTP has a therapeutic team that carefully screens all referrals of children to
their programs. This team consists of the Directors, Therapist/Consuftant, Senior
Counselors, parents, school personnel, and Social Workers.
9. Who determines if an individual Is slightly aggressive, mildly
aggressive or severely aggressive? Where Is that fine line? Are there
definitions for these labels?
Level of aggressive behavior is determined by a Mental Health Professional.
A Mental Health Professional means a person providing clinical services in the
diagnosis and treatment of children's emotional disorders. A mental health
professional must have training and experience in working with children consistent
with the age group to which the mental health professional is assigned. A mental
health professional may by any of the following: a registered psychiatric nurse,
a licensed clinical social worker, a licensed psychologist, a licensed psychiatrist,
or a marriage and family therapist. All must have a minimum of 4000 hours (2 years)
clinical experience with children with emotional difficulties. (Minnesota Compre-
hensive Children's Mental Health Act 245.4871, subdivision 27).
There are guidelines for determining the severity of aggression in children.
These are determined by licensed psychologists, psychiatrists, or other mental
health professionals. Specific diagnoses are assigned to children according to
the severity of aggression.
McLeod Treatment Programs does not accept children that have been
determined to be unsafe in a community environment.
10. How many staff members on duty at night? If there is an emergency,
requiring their full attention; how would they handle the residents?
3 Full time counselors are on duty at night. All activities at the Shelter Home
require their full attention. All staff members are fully trained to attend to any
situation that may arise. On call supervisors are available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week should counselors need their assistance.
0 3
11. Can this operation change to adults, dangerous residents, etc.?
No 0
12. What is the turnover of staff in a place such as this?
MTP turnover is very low. Employees are selected for their abilities, experience,
and commitment to children and the program.
13. How does turnover affect the establishment?
Staff turnover is handled carefully to ensure that children are well taken care
of. Often, children experience a sense of loss when a staff member that they had
a close relationship leaves for other employment. This loss is addressed in
individual and group counseling.
14. Do the church members know what is proposed for this building?
Please direct this question to the church members.
15. Where would liability to neighbors rest?
McLeod Treatment Programs keeps in force a full liability insurance policy.
'several questionstcomments on page 2-5 may be addressed at the
meeting as the questions are subjective and individual feeling oriented.
Although we are unable to tell you how to feel, we will be happy to
facilitate discussion on feelings of safety, security, fear, lack of trust of
environment, total lifestyle change, intimation ( ?) physically and
mentally, and peace of mind.
16. Many of the residents of this neighborhood have lived in their homes
for over 25 years. They have never felt threatened or any reason to feel
less than completely safe 24 hours a day.
Sheppard House (boys 10 -17) has been located at 440 Grove Street (only 3
blocks away) for 15 years.
17. Having this type of group home/crisis center in your neighborhood is
Inevitably going to affect the value of your property.
Please refer to a realtor for information regarding this concern.
4 0
18. Several questions/comments were made about spending/saving
taxpayers dollars.
As stated previously, McLeod Treatment Programs, Inc. is a private corporation.
These programs are self- sufficient and funds needed for operation are self- generated.
In fact, McLeod Treatment Programs currently generate nearly one million dollars
in funding resources and the majority of those funds are spent in Hutchinson in the
form of supplies, remodeling, furniture, services, staff salaries, and resident needs.
19. Have you considered the current social services building in
Glencoe?
This is not an option.
20. Will any of these children be going to school In Hutchinson? Is the
school system prepared for this (size and problems)?
We are in close contact with the schools in developing a positive learning
environment for the children. The school will be on site and the children will not
attend Hutchinson Schools.
21. Do you realize the type of people you will be bringing into our
community and the affect it will have on the residents?
Yes, our children can be seen behaving negatively in public - smoking, using
profanity, running away, skipping school, and sometimes causing trouble. But is
every child in the community causing trouble a group home kid? No. Do only
group home kids smoke, use profanity, run away, skip school, and cause trouble?
No.
Is there a difference between a Hutch child who lives at home and does these
things as opposed to a Hutch child in the shelter home who does these things? Yes,
you can guarantee that the shelter home child will be held accountable for his actions
and will suffer consequences whether it be community service or formal charges
for illegal acts. Can we say the same for the Hutch child who never gets caught? No.
Children placed in a shelter home come from very chaotic settings.
They need a safe, positive, and structured environment in which to grow and learn
to deal with the many difficulties they face. These difficulties may include past
abuse and potential for further abuse, societal rejection and hate, removal from a
familiar environment to one that is unfamiliar, peer rejection/taunting/verbal abuse,
parental abandonment, low self- esteem and self- image, blame for all community
problems with juveniles, pressure of knowing they are always under watchful eye
so they better not even look at another person, much less defend themselves as
they are taunted, teased, punished, attacked, and ostracized by both children and
adults in our community. 5
Yes, we know the type of people we are bringing in.
Our children can be seen voluntarily cleaning up ditches through the Adopt a
Highway Program. They can be seen cleaning parks, painting over graffiti (done by
other kids), attending workshops given by community members, and picking up refuse
on the banks of the Crow River through the Serve America Youth Program.
They can be seen working for various non- profit agencies in the community -
food shelf, historical society, schools, day care programs, and for the city of
Hutchinson through the Private Industry Council Employment Program. They can be
seen at the Farmer's Market on Wednesdays and Saturdays selling tomatoes,
potatoes, pumpkins, etc. that they have worked very hard all summer to grow in our
Learning to Grow, Growing to Learn Garden Project.
They can be seen in the community playing racquetball at the health club,
checking books out of the library, going to a movie at the State Theater, playing
volleyball at Robert's park, and accompanying staff to the many establishments in
Hutchinson in which we do business.
They can be seen in the schools singing in a choir at a school concert, tutoring
other children having difficulties, and playing volleyball, football, and baseball for the
Hutch Tigers. They can be seen in the local newspapers for accomplishments such as
Student of the Month, Poetry and Art Contest Winners, and 4 -H activities.
Yes, we know what kind of people we are bringing into the shelter home. They
are Hutchinson kids. We are bringing in kids who need the support of the people
around them to guide them into being productive members of the community in which
they live. McLeod Treatment Programs take pride being members of this community
and it is our mission to help kids who don't even have pride in themselves, much less
their surroundings, to set goals and to have aspirations. MTP aims to help them see
the possibility of attaining those goals and aspirations, even though they've been
given the message that they can't, by giving them the tools they need to function in a
family, school, community, or society that has previously rejected them.
*The intention of this document is to address question/concerns
posed by the concerned neighobors of Bethany Baptist Church. This
document does not address anticipated questions/concerns. Any further
questions/concerns may be addressed at the informational meeting - time
to be determined.
6
City 0f
ORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff
DATE: October 28, 1994
RE: Group Home Informational Meeting
As was directed at the Planning Commission meeting on October 18, the McLeod Treatment
Centers, Inc. and the citizen group met yesterday evening to discuss the proposed group home to
be located in the existing Bethany Baptist Church. The following is the list of attendees:
NAME
Steve & Deb Fitzloff
Amelia Sylvester
Gordon & Myrtle Bauer
Linda Buske
Ken & Pat Nichols
Mary Grupe
Terry Pelikan
Doug & Sharon Starrett
Bill & Jan Kreitlow
Ray & Marilyn Otte
Bill Snyder
Grant Knutson
Kristin Lies
Jill Kloeckl
Tom Price
Alvin T. Huff
Mary Berger
Bruce Rannow
Dick Jensen
Martin & Delores Muetzel
Ella Hennen
Bev Wangerin
Cite Center
1I1 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax (612) 234 -4240
ADDRESS
820 Grove St.
854 Brown St.
844 Brown St.
835 Grove St.
850 Grove St.
743 Grove St.
735 Grove St.
850 Lynn Rd.
530 Linden Ave.
875 Lynn Rd.
McLeod Treatment Centers, Inc. board member
McLeod Treatment Centers, Inc. board member
Group Home Director
Group Home Director
Group Home Therapist
County Commissioner
855 Grove St.
835 Lynn Rd.
216 Linden Ave.
830 Grove St. S.
870 Grove St. S.
County Commissioner
Parks & Recreation Police Services
900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin St.
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 5.
(612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2
Fax (612) 234 -4240 Fax(612)587
- Primed on re(, c led Paper-
Memorandum
Page 2
October 28, 1994
NAME
Rev. Charles J. Carlson
Warren Sytsma
Mildred Braun
Jerry & Kathy Steele
Larry & Arlene Moehring
Jim Marka
Brenda Ewing
ADDRESS
800 Grove St. S. (Bethany Baptist)
894 Lynn Rd.
815 Grove St.
324 Linden Ave.
870 Lynn Rd.
City of Hutchinson
City of Hutchinson
Several questions posed by the citizen group were answered, however, no consensus was
achieved as to whether or not the group home should be conditionally permitted as requested by
McLeod Treatment Centers.
A discussion was held regarding the state statutes which apply to group homes. Jim Marka
informed the group that City legal counsel is reviewing the statute, and an opinion is anticipated
prior to the next Planning Commission meeting.
If you have any questions regarding the informational meeting or the conditional use application,
please contact planning staff.
cc: Jim Marka
File
t._.J
0
0
C
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE #464 SECTION 10.08
"ANTENNAS AND TOWERS"
Pursuant to Section 6.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
to amend the Zoning Ordinance.
HISTORY
In June of 1994, the Hutchinson Planning Staff requested a change
to the zoning ordinance regarding antennas and towers for ham radio
operations. The amendment was then turned over to the city attorney
for legal review in July, August and September. In October, 1994,
the revised amendment was requested.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All procedural requirements
Ordinance have been complied
2. Notice was published in the
October 6, 1994.
3. The proposal was deemed to
interest of the City.
for amendments to the Zoning
with.
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday,
be appropriate and in the best
The hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, October 18, 1994, and continued to Tuesday,
November 15, 1994, at which time there was no one present objecting
to the request.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request to amend Zoning Ordinance #464 be granted as
set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
City Center
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Parksc44AYetaWAson Planning COmmisEdIduServices
111 Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151
Fax(612)234 -4240
(612) 587 -2975
Far(612)234- 4240
[1 �l
(612) 587 -2242
Fax(612)587 -6427
- Prin led on recycled paper-
(�
ORDINANCE NO. 94-125 2ND SERIES
PUBLICATION NO. is
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE SECTION 10.08 "ANTENNAS AND TOWERS" AND ADOPTING BY
REFEREIjCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code, Sec. 10.08 is hereby amended by
substituting the following language, in its entirety, for existing
City Code Sec. 10.08:
SEC. 10.08 ANTENNAS AND TOWERS
Subd. 1. Antennas and Dish -Type Antennas Having a
Diameter No Greater than 30 Inches. Antennas and towers having
over -all heights of 75 feet or less are a Permitted Use in all
Districts and are permitted encroachments on height requirements of
this Code. This includes towers of all types and antennas of all
types and sizes except dish - shaped antennas having a diameter
greater than 30 inches. Antennas and dish - shaped antennas having
• diameter of 30 inches or less are exempt from any requirement for
• building permit, but are subject to excavation permit
requirements when applicable. Antennas and towers higher than 75
feet require a conditional use permit.
a. Vertical Antennas. The bottom of the base of
a mast -or tower - mounted vertical antenna may
be at a height of 75 feet or less with no
over -all height limit for the tope of the
antenna. The highest point of any ground -
mounted vertical antenna, however, may be no
more than 75 feet.
b.
The point at which the main boom of a
directional, non - dish -type satellite
communications antenna or antenna array is
attached to its support structure (tower,
mast, rotator, etc.) can be no more than 75
feet high. The uppermost part(s) of such
antenna(s) can be at 100 feet.
C. Height. The height of an antenna, dish
antenna, or tower shall be measured from the
adjacent ground elevation at the base of the
antenna, dish, or tower to the highest point
of the antenna or tower. If the antenna or
tower is mounted on a building, height is
measured from the average grade level on which
the building is constructed.
d. Definitions.
. An antenna is a wire or other device that
receives or transmits radio waves.
. A tower is defined as a structure to which
an antenna is attached.
. A directional satellite communications
antenna is defined as any directional antenna
or antenna array designed to provide radio
communications using satellites, manned or
unmanned spacecraft, moonbounce, tropo-
scatter, meteor -trail ionization, or similar
vehicles or propagation modes.
Subd. 2. Installation Requirements. An excavation
permit is required for all towers and antennas for which excavation
is required. All antennas and towers must conform to the Uniform
Building Code, the National Electric Code, the City /County Airport
Zoning Ordinance, and the regulations of the Federal Airways
Administration (FAA) and Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Antennas or towers may be installed in utility easements if a
waiver is obtained from the City Engineer and the Hutchinson
Utilities Commission.
Subd. 3. Tover Locations. Antennas and towers shall not
be allowed (1) nearer the street than the principal building on the
lot; and (2) nearer the rear or side lot lines than the minimum
rear or side yard setback. Wire antennas are exempt from this
requirement.
Subd. 4. Encroachment. No part of an antenna may extend
beyond the lot line over an adjoining lot without written
permission from the owner or lessee of that adjoining lot.
Subd. 5. Reservations. The City reserves the right to
permit antennas, in its sole discretion, on the tope of water
towers, high rise buildings and other structures. The City, at its
sole option, may also require a verification of approval from the
Hutchinson Community Hospital /Burns Manor Nursing Home or the
Municipal Airport when height limitations are of concern for
helicopter and flight operations.
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption
and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Published in the Hutchinson
First reading
Second readinq
Leader on
day of November, 1994.
Mayor
C
M E M O K A A O U M
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PETITION FOR ANNEXATION REQUESTED BY
ROBERT COWGER TO ANNEX 8.50 ACRES IN LYNN TOWNSHIP
Pursuant to Section 414.033, Subd. 2b, of Minnesota Statues 1992, the Hutchinson
Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation
with respect to the aforementioned request for annexation.
HISTORY
On September 23, 1994, Mr. Robert Cowger submitted a petition for annexation of 8.50
acres located in Section 2, Lynn Township. A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 15, 1994, at which time
there was no one present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published
in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements for annexation.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request
for annexation be granted as set forth above subject to right of way being granted
by property owner to the west of property.
City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax (612) 234 -4240
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(612) 587 -2975
Fax (612) 234 -4240
- Printed on re"cled paper -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -2242
i' Fax (612) 587 -6427
0
PREUMNARY SKETCH FOR: DAN COWGER
n
"ITet part of the Southwest
Quarter or Section 2, lown-
ship 116 North, Range 30 West
of the Stn Principal Meridian
described as follmwsi
beginning at the southweat
corner of said Southwest
Quarter; thence northerly,
along the west line or said
Southwest Quarter, a dis-
tance of 176 -4UU feet;
thence easterly, deflect-
ing to the right 90 de-
grees 00 minutes 00 sec-
onds, to the westerly shore
line of Otter Lake; thence
�o aherly, along said ono re
line, t. the lot... ection
with the south line of said
.uuthwest Quarter, thence
westerly, •cony said south
U.., to the yaint of be-
g inn ln2.
N
u N+ q 2vu
scal
o tle w�u "on monumem
TOTAL AREA .8 ✓2 ACRES
1 !-rby certify that this a rvey
s {cep•ral M me or arler my
lirec[ supervision and that I an
&1V I Lensed lard I.—...
W, the laws of the State of
mimusut•.
it
o!
a.
NI
:I
-
;I
es 2a -25 I..,
am". 1 iom
i
I
a.2T
r.
N 1
Qa;
a.
in
O
Tr
is room
.A w io lie Leo . am. m
i
e,
Y n
l
j.
RTC 180 TH STREET -
449
N89-15 05-W
f
rya,'
Y
.a.
Ui
m f
W
p G
F
3,
_ 1
I
.21 '
a.
in
O
Tr
is room
.A w io lie Leo . am. m
i
e,
Y n
l
j.
RTC 180 TH STREET -
449
N89-15 05-W
f
Publication #4734
-. - --
0
— Jr
I 1
e
/J
I:
i
I
i
I
'( --
R -1
R -2
R
R -z
R
C -1
C -2
C
:t
i
8.50 acre
parcel
I
e
1 � )�
Area to
be
Annexed
-. - --
0
— Jr
I 1
e
/J
I:
i
I
i
I
'( --
R -1
R -2
R
R -z
R
C -1
C -2
C
V
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
MONA HANSON TO MOVE A 1972 RIVIERA MOBILE HOME TO
LOT 131 IN MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT
Pursuant to Section 8.08, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On October 12, 1994, Mona Hanson, submitted an application for a
conditional use permit to move a 1972 Riviera mobile home to Lot
131 in McDonalds Trailer Court. A public hearing was held at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 15,
1994, at which time there was no one present objecting to the
request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3,
1994.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit begranted based
on the findings set forth above subject to meeting life safety
issue requirements according to Section 8.08, Hutchinson Zoning
Ordinance #464.
Respectfully submitted,
City Center
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Parks& Reedixibehinson Planning ComMirs&u6ces
III Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975
(672) 587 -2242
Fax(612)234 -4240
Fax(612)234 -4240 i1_
_
% l Fazi612)587 -6427
-Printed on recycled paper- %
\/
T� k 74 1 Y
F-
t
.g R
f y
•fY
i
x
c
0 RESOLUTION NO. 10340
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 8.08 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
REQUESTED BY MONA HANSON TO MOVE 1972 MOBILE HOME TO LOT
IN MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Ms. Mona Hanson, has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.08 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to move a 1972 Riviera mobile home unto lot 131
McDonalds Trailer Court.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above subject
to the meeting the life safety issue requirements according to
Section 8.08, Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance #464.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
�J
C.
H E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
CINDY BEADELL TO SELL CHRISTMAS TREES IN R -2
DISTRICT LOCATED AT 540 GLEN ST.
Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On October 21, 1994, Cindy
• a conditional use permit to
lot in R -2 district located
held at the regular meeting
November 15, 1994, at which
to the request.
Beadell, submitted an application for
permit the sale of Christmas trees on
at 540 Glen St. A public hearing was
of the Planning Commission on Tuesday,
time there was no one present objecting
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3,
1994.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be granted
based on the findings set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning
Commission
City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN55350 -3097
Hutchinson:, MN55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975 �/
(612) 587 -2242
Fax (612) 234 -4240
Fax (612) 234 -4240
Fax (112) 587 -6427
- Primed on recycled paper -
RESOLUTION NO. 10341
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 8.05 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
REQUESTED BY CINDY BEADELL TO SELL CHRISTMAS TREES ON LOT
IN R -2 DISTRICT LOCATED AT 540 GLEN STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Ms. Cindy Beadell, has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.05 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to sell Christmas trees on lot in R -2 district
located at 540 Glen Street with the following legal description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 3 and 1/2 vacated alley adjacent
Bonniwell's Addition
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
l K,
s
0
0
C
H E K O R A N D U H
DATE: November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
DOUG RETTKE TO MOVE A BUILDING FOR WAREHOUSE TO I/C
DISTRICT AT 184 -4TH AVE N.W.
Pursuant to Section 8.13, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On October 28, 1994, Douglas Rettke, submitted an application for
a conditional use permit to permit him to move a building for
warehouse located in the I/C district, 184 -4th Ave N.W. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, November 15, 1994, at which time there was no one
present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3,
1994.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be granted
based on the findings set forth above subject to attached staff
recommendations of November 4, 1994.
Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett,
Chairman
Hutchinson Planning
Commission
City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(612) 587- 2975 `` _
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -2242
Fax(612)234 -4240
Fax(612)234 -4240 7
Fax(612)587 -6427
- Prin red on recycled paper -
9U /Z D /NO PERM/ T SURVEY
FOR: 001116L AS A. RETNE
LOT 4, BLACK 23 TRUNK H I GHWAY N0. 7
TOWS /7E Cr HUTCH /NSM (N //?)
URB a WTTER
DENOTES IRON MON. INPLACE
O DENOTES IRON MON. PLACED
X DENOTES EXIST. SPOT ELEV.
( ) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEV.
BENCHMARK: NAIL 8 LATH IN
E. FACE P.P. NEAR NW COR.
LOT B, BLOCK 23
ELEVATION • 1045.90
e
+!,! L 66.00
X'STING
HOUSE u
+.
le. 3'b
+' e
O1 e.d•
a 9
►4•
,y a
+ o
m
a�
46.0) +` 3
• ac. VV
M
O_
8 O Gy O
W^ W N
D a_
a g a W8
O OW
cc
b a
32.00'
+ . (46. O )
0 •
O
N
�! N 90° 00'
•
IF
O �
�m
b
o
~ o
O �
,O Q Oy
am
27_70'
O
N
+
9
0
0
8
Z
�!
.
t
+BPI
,P5. 67' o,` }11 %,
•r 't
BENCHMARK
I hereby cartltyy that thls Survey, Plan or Report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor(lunder the laws
of the Sta`e�Minn� Minnesota. Reg. No. 18164, Date: JOU /' 1Q91
Gl — /
9
RESOLUTION NO. 10342 0
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 8.13 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
REQUESTED BY DOUGLAS RETTKE TO MOVE A BUILDING UNTO LOT IN I/C
DISTRICT FOR WAREHOUSE LOCATED AT 184 -4TH AVE NW.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Mr. Douglas Rettke, has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 8.13 of Zoning
Ordinance No. 464 to move a building for warehouse located in the
I/C district, 184 -4th Ave. N.W. with the following legal
description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: North 1/2 of Lot 4, Block 23
North 112 of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted based on the findings set forth above subject
to the attached staff recommendations of November 4, 1994.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
1]
r
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE:
T0: Hutchinson Planning Commission
November 4, 1994
FROM Planning Staff - G. Plotz, B. Ewing, M. Hensen, S.
Madson, G. Brandt, D. Lennes, B. Wentworth and J. Webster
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DOUG
RETTKE TO MOVE A BUILDING FOR WAREHOUSE IN I/C DISTRICT
LOCATED AT 184 - 4TH AVE NW
1) The Planning Staff is requesting the additional information
prior to a recommendation. Please note the proposed "seed corn
warehouse" is an appropriate land use for the I/C district.
. A. Registered land survey /site plan representing corner stakes,
lot dimensions, drainage contours (both existing and
proposed), building and parking lot setbacks, location of
gas /electric /water /sewer services needed and if necessary to
be relocated, finish floor elevations, parking lot layout.
B. Stormwater runoff must not be compounded. (Neighbors garage
drainage, etc.) The site must be able to retain via retention
pond, storm water runoff the pre - development flows and
velocities. Because this is less than one acre, professional
design is not required.
C. Will snow be stockpiled or trucked off?
D. Minimum dimensions for perpendicular parking off the alley
typically 8' x 20' for cars and 12' x 65' for semi - offloading.
Parking stalls to be 20' x 8'.
E. Off- loading of all vehicles to be off public right of way.
F. Represent proposed signage.
G. Represent proposed plantings.
H. Represent any proposed outdoor storage (if applicable).
City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Fax(612)234 -4240 Fax(612)234 -4240 Fax(612)587 -6427
r
- Printed on recycled paper -
Planning Staff Memo
Conditional Use Permit
Doug Rettke
Page 2
I. One hour exterior walls required if closer than 20' to
property line.
J. We highly recommend maintaining recommended interior lot
setbacks, setbacks between buildings and off the alley for
parking.
K. It is very unlikely natural gas or electric service will be
available to that lot in 1994.
L. A moving permit is required. The building must be moved
before 8 a.m. or after 8 p.m.
M. In the event electric or gas service to the current building
is to be relocated, it will be at the owner's expense.
N. Gas service must be separate for the house and warehouse and
metered separately. (State permit, coming from Hwy 7)
0. The building must have a uniform exterior appearance (color).
Repair damaged siding.
P. Provide a plan showing use or removal of existing slab once
the building is removed.
2) The southerly portion of the lot does appear to be in the 100
year flood zone. The finish floor elevation must be 1046.2
feet and must be recertified by a registered land surveyor.
CC: Doug Rettke
E
u
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE, November 16, 1994
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -1 TO C -4 PROPERTY
LOCATED ALONG HWY 7 E REQUESTED BY ROBERT BARWICK FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF MOTEL
Pursuant to Section 6.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for rezoning.
HISTORY
. On October 28, 1994, Mr. Robert Barwick, submitted a request to
rezone property from R -1 (Single Family Residence District) to C -4
(Fringe Commercial District) property located on Hwy 7 E. for
construction of motel. A hearing was held at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 15, 1994, there was no
one present objecting to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3,
1994.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the
request be approved.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request to rezone be approved base on the findings
set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
Printed an recycled paper -
Clint Gruett, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
III Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street SW
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151
(612) 587 -2975
(612) 587 -2242
Fax (612) 234 -4240
Fax (612) 234 -4240 —
Fax (612) 587 -6427
Printed an recycled paper -
Publication # 4139
Iz
i
—._
.I
Area to be
Rezone to C -4l� I
i 1-
11
z
12 J
��� , ! JT1iy J • `
z EasT
f
t
+ iI , t •
1
to
1 1x T • .... —a
�I E• o • ��It i
� o o ¢• a �-
2
�MCI4NTJ
J •
< T ,
¢ „
HILLTOP DRIVE
1� 7
Oj0 1 ! •
t
w +- I_
s
// Al I
0
M
LA
MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, November 15, 1994
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at 5:30 p.m. with the following
members present: Glenn Matejka, Roger Gilmer, Bill Craig, Craig Lenz, Dean Wood and
Chairman Gruett. Member absent: April Brandt. Also present: Brenda Ewing, Planning
Coordinator and Jim Marka, Building Official.
2. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING DATED OCTOBER 18
1994
Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the minutes dated October 18, 1994, seconded by
Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY MCLEOD COUNTY TREATMENT CENTER/BETHANY
BAPTIST CHURCH TO CHANGE USE FROM CHURCH TO SHELTER
HOME IN R -2 DISTRICT
Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 5:31 p.m. with the reading of publication
• #4723 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit requested by
McLeod County Treatment Center/Bethany Baptist Church to change use from
church to shelter home in R -2 district located at 800 Grove St.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the informational meeting held
with the neighboring property owners on October 27, 1994. She also commented
on the legal opinion from City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
Mr. Steve Fitzloff, 820 Grove St., again expressed the same concerns as at the
October meeting and the informational meeting. Those concerns were; property
values in the area, security of the neighborhood, terminology of the information
presented by the applicant and the fact several other property owners have also
expressed concern.
Mr. Gail Plaisance, 509 Linden Ave., commented on his concern for the children
of the neighborhood. He stated he was told there was a site in Glencoe for the
facility.
Mr. Jerry Brown, 736 Brown St., stated he agrees with the need but not the
means.
• Ms. Mary Grupe, 743 Grove St., explained her family's move to Hutchinson and
the fact they were looking for a good neighborhood when they moved in March
of this year.
IN
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
Ms. Mary Berger, 855 Grove St., commented on the meetings the neighborhood
. held. She stated a concern is with the many conflicting answers about the home
and the fact the police could be there at anytime of the evening.
Mr. Doug Rettke, 4th and Lynn, stated he lives near a group home and has had
more vandalism at this residence, however, he does not know if it is due to group
home residents or not.
Mr. Dick Jensen, 216 Linden, stated he is not strongly opposed to the request and
that the need is valid. He commented he is interested in the property value and
the potential number of buyers affected.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the staff prospective of the character
of the neighborhood.
Discussion followed on the zoning requirements in residential districts and the
permitted number of residents in a home such as this.
Mr. Don Schultz, 835 Church St., stated he is against any business in residential
districts.
Mr. Craig made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing
closed at 5:50 p.m. Mr. Craig commented on the definition of conditional use
• permit. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend denial of the request. Seconded
by Mr. Lenz the motion carried after a roll call vote. Mr. Craig, Mr. Lenz, Mr.
Gruett and Mr. Wood voting aye. Mr. Matejka and Mr. Gilmer voting nay. Mr.
Matejka commented on the precedent this could set to serve the community in this
way. County Commissioner Al Huff explained the process the county has gone
through to find support for this effort. He stated there is not a site in Glencoe
suitable for the facility. Mr. Craig made a motion to direct staff to research
language to amend the zoning ordinance for appropriate use, seconded by Mr.
Matejka the motion carried unanimously.
b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO ZONING
ORDINANCE SECTION 10.08 REGARDING ANTENNAS AND TOWERS
Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 6:00 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4726 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 6, 1994. The
request is for considering an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance Section 10.08
regarding antennas and towers.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the wording as presented by
the City Attorney.
Mr. Matejka moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing
• closed at 6:02 p.m. Mr. Matejka made a motion to recommend approval of the
amendment. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously.
2
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
. c) CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION OF 8.50 ACRES IN LYNN TWP.
REQUESTED BY DAN AND ROBERT COWGER
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:04 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4734 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994. The
request is for consideration of a petition to annex 8.50 acres located in Section 2,
Lynn Township, requested by Robert and Dan Cowger.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the request and the letter from
Mr. Charles Johnson stating he is not interested in annexing his property.
Building Official Jim Marka stated the road could stay as it is and the right of way
dedicated to the city.
Mr. Dan Cowger explained the county recommended petitioning for annexation
when he went to them with a sketch and preliminary plat.
Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Matejka the hearing closed
at 6:15 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to approve the annexation and the right of
way dedicated from Johnson property on the west. The Johnson property is not to be
forced in at this time and assessments are to be deferred on that property. Seconded
. by Mr. Matejka the motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Ernst Duesterhoeft, Lynn Township, inquired as to which roads would belong
to the city.
d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MOVE A 1972
MOBILE HOME UNTO LOT IN MCDONALDS TRAILER COURT
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:16 p.m. with the reading of publication
44735 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to move a 1972
Riviera mobile home unto lot 131 in McDonalds Trailer Court.
Ms. Ewing explained the staff recommendations and that the property owner has met
all the life safety requirements.
Mr. Wood made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Craig the hearing
closed at 6:17 p.m. Mr. Wood made a motion to recommend approval of the request
with staff recommendations to meet the life safety requirements. Seconded by Mr.
Craig the motion carried unanimously.
• e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO SELL CHRISTMAS
TREES IN R -2 DISTRICT REQUESTED BY CINDY BEADELL LOCATED AT
540 GLEN ST.
3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
. Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:18 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4736 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994.
The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to sell
Christmas trees in R -2 District located at 540 Glen St.
Planning Coordinator Ewing commented on the staff recommendation of approval
and the favorable letter received from a neighboring property owner.
Mr. Matejka moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz the hearing closed
at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Matejka made a motion to recommend approval of the request.
Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
f) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
DOUG RETTKE TO MOVE A BUILDING FOR WAREHOUSE TO I/C
DISTRICT LOCATED AT 1844TH AVE NW.
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:21 p.m. with the reading of publication
94737 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994.
The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to move a
building for warehouse to I/C district located at 184 -4th Ave. N.W.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the numerous staff
• requirements and the survey presented by Mr. Rettke.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the staff recommendations stated
many have been met. Discussion followed on the 6' setback and drainage. There
was also discussion on the parking and off - loading berth.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Matejka the hearing closed
at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the request
subject to staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Matejka the motion carried
unanimously.
g) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -1 TO C -4 NEWLY ANNEXED
PROPERTY ON HWY 7 EAST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF MOTEL
REQUESTED BY ROBERT BARWICK
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 6:32 p.m. with the reading of publication
#4739 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, November 3, 1994.
The request is for the purpose of considering a request to rezone newly annexed
property on Hwy 7 East from R -1 to C -4 for construction of motel.
Ms. Ewing stated the State Municipal Board did approve the annexation requested
in October.
• Mr. Craig moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Wood the hearing closed
at 6:35 p.m. Mr. Craig made a motion to recommend approval of the rezoning
request. Seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously.
9
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
4. OLD BUSINESS
. NONE
5. NEW BUSINESS
a) CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF URBAN BOUNDARY MAP AND
ANNEXATION IN ACOMA TWP.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the meeting held in June with Acoma
Township residents. The meeting was tabled until this meeting (November). He
stated legislation has changed and at the present time, annexations require a public
hearing at the local municipal level. The need for orderly annexation is taken care
of through the legislation.
Mr. Jim Field, Acoma Twp., representing the chairman, stated the township
officials feel they can not do much about the annexation.
Mr. Marka explained the development in the area and the extension of services.
He commented the mobile home park has water at this time. A letter of
opposition by Arty. Steven Ward representing Mr. Mark Fratzke was read.
Jim Marka explained the city can not service the remainder of the Montgomery
• property out of city limits.
Mr. Dave Bernhagen questioned the road right of way being annexed and how that
would affect his taxes. Discussion followed on the cost to property owners.
Building Official Marka explained development would be encouraged when the
collector road is located. He stated the present service will handle Krisean Acres
and Montgomery property. Rust Engineering will do a study on the remaining
property for services.
Discussion followed on maintaining Koglin Rd. or Co. Rd. 76.
Mr. Craig made a motion to prepare for a public hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz
the motion carried unanimously.
b) DISCUSSION TO CHANGE STREET NAME FROM ROBERTS ROAD TO
ROBERTS AVE. S.W.
Planning Coordinator Brenda Ewing commented on the two informational
meetings with property owners and explained the staff would recommend changing
all of Roberts Rd. to alleviate confusion of numbering for emergency services.
Discussion followed on the informational meetings and the opposition to the
• change.
5
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 15, 1994
It was the consensus of the planning commission to table the item until the plats
are in for the south area.
Mr. Lenz moved to table the item with an update at the next meeting, seconded
by Mr. Gilmer the motion carried unanimously.
c) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
Mr. Marka explained the City Council adopted an amendment to the ordinance and
this item was for information only.
d) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Jim Marka presented a portion of the city survey regarding building and zoning
enforcement.
6. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
•
•
9
Ho. =97— Ayollution for PorWt Coral For
Y /1Lr4hrly Ca. xba ol6
CHRISTMAS
APPLICATION FOR --mE .mDu ----- -PERMIT
To the ..................... CITY COUNCIL
..................................
of the ............. . .......... CITY
..................................................... of. ............ ....... HUTCHINSON .............................................................. in the County of
.... ................................ CLE.OD . .. . ......................... ................ State of Minnesota:
.
The undersigned owner whose address is ....... ..... R2 ... Br Street..
....own ............................................................................ ...............................
applies for a permit to........ULL ... QIRR STMAS
area...................... .......... ........ . ............. ................................................................................ _ .......... I........
and hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all world which ehall be done and all
materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and epecifccations therefor herewith submitted
and with all the ordinances of said ........................_CITY, OF HUTCHINSON
applicable thereto.
.4pplicant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specifud as
follows:
......................................................................................................................................................................................... ...............................
FEE: $5.00
................
i
Owner
,11—/ v
•
c
M E M O R A N D U M
November 18, 1994
TO: Mavor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE,: Consideration of Purchase
Compost/Wastewater Facility
of Land Adjacent to
Dolf and I reconunend continuing this item until the next Council meeting. We are
reviewing other options to purchase the land, and will have a coPy of the trail proposal
at that time also.
• City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax(612)234 -4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(612) 587 -2975
Fax (612) 234 -4240
- Panted on renmled paper -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
(7 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(X (612) 587 -2242
Fax (612) 587 -6427
'A.0 ADMIITCD W "xAS "D., W YORR
November 17, 1994
ARNOLD & McDONVELL
ATTORNEYS AT LANs
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street South
Hutchinson, MN 55350
40 Dear Gary:
1612587 -7575
PAX [012'567 -4069
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Or COUNSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MTKNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 56318
612 546 - 0000
FAX '612'. 648 -1703
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
612' 380 -2214
FAX 512'389 -5506
NOV is WPM.-
I'm enclosing herewith a very rough draft of the proposed agreement
between the City of Hutchinson and The McNelly Group. I believe
this agreement will require some revisions.
Three thoughts occurred to me that needs to be addressed.
First, I am assuming in this agreement that the City of Hutchinson
is responsible for maintaining the equipment even though it is
warranted by McNelly. This agreement so reflects.
Second, you might want to check that we have properly set out the
correct number, and total amount, of payments to be made to
McNelly. I have called for $15,000 as a down payment plus $5,000
a month from February of 1995, running through and including
January of 1997. According to my arithmetic, the total amount to
be paid by Hutchinson is $135,000.00.
The third issue concerns the computer software. I am unclear as to
how that should be treated in this agreement. At present, I have
not pr:vided for any discussion on this topic at all. I presume
McNelly would like to retain ownership and use, but in that case a
license needs to be granted to the city for any software.
• These are all issues that someone should get back to me on at their
earliest convenience. I have not attached any exhibits. to the
document because all of the exhibits are in your possession. I
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
""CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAN SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIOS
DAN 11) H. ARNOLD'
GARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON-
•
G. DAR RY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA E. PHETLA.ND
DAVID A. HRUEOGEMA_ \N
PAUL D. DOVE `•
RICHARD G. MCOEE
CATHRYN D. HEBER
GINA M. HRANDT
RRETT D. ARNOLD
'A.0 ADMIITCD W "xAS "D., W YORR
November 17, 1994
ARNOLD & McDONVELL
ATTORNEYS AT LANs
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street South
Hutchinson, MN 55350
40 Dear Gary:
1612587 -7575
PAX [012'567 -4069
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Or COUNSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MTKNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 56318
612 546 - 0000
FAX '612'. 648 -1703
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
612' 380 -2214
FAX 512'389 -5506
NOV is WPM.-
I'm enclosing herewith a very rough draft of the proposed agreement
between the City of Hutchinson and The McNelly Group. I believe
this agreement will require some revisions.
Three thoughts occurred to me that needs to be addressed.
First, I am assuming in this agreement that the City of Hutchinson
is responsible for maintaining the equipment even though it is
warranted by McNelly. This agreement so reflects.
Second, you might want to check that we have properly set out the
correct number, and total amount, of payments to be made to
McNelly. I have called for $15,000 as a down payment plus $5,000
a month from February of 1995, running through and including
January of 1997. According to my arithmetic, the total amount to
be paid by Hutchinson is $135,000.00.
The third issue concerns the computer software. I am unclear as to
how that should be treated in this agreement. At present, I have
not pr:vided for any discussion on this topic at all. I presume
McNelly would like to retain ownership and use, but in that case a
license needs to be granted to the city for any software.
• These are all issues that someone should get back to me on at their
earliest convenience. I have not attached any exhibits. to the
document because all of the exhibits are in your possession. I
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
""CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAN SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIOS
Page 2
November 17, 1994
Mr. Plotz
would suggest that it would be a good idea to have those exhibits
made available to the city council.
If you need additional information relative to this agreement,
please advise.
Thank you. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLr LL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:dfp
Enclosure
0
•
•
0
I.
Ll I
A.
0
ad
N;. 47411 a. .", 8
COMPOST SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS
1HUTCWKSON, MINNESOTA
OQBJECf WE
The compost system shall be capable of transforming incoming feedstock materials (sewage
sludge and yard waste) into a viable and marketable compost product suitable for
unrestricted land application use under the federal and state laws and regulations.
FEEDSTOCK PREPARATION
Contaminant Removal
Composting system shall include a viable method ofpreventntg visible contaminants within
the yard waste materials, i.e. metals (tin cans, etc.), plastics, etc.
Particle Size
i
Incoming feedstock materials and any additional amendments utilized must be shredded to
a uniform particle siize. roughly 1 5 to 3 inches in length. The purpose of this requirements
is to increase the surface area available to the microbial population (decomposition occurs
at ,6r near the surface of material). Examples of materials requiring shredding include: yard
waste brush, wooden pallets.
Particle sizing efficiency can be determined from independent sieve analysis or from
shredder manufacturer's supplied data.
C. Material Mix
Feedstock materials and any required amendments must be thoroug y mixed to achieve an
intti l cartmLrA= ratio (N ratio) within the mp of 25/1 to 4011. A C/N ratio below
the above range can lead to a higher probability of ammonia off - gassing, thus increasing
odor generation. A C/N ratio above the stated range can cause a slow down in degradation
due to microbial difficulty breaking down some components of carbon (i.e., lignin,
cellulose).
D. Moisture
Initial composting mix (feedstock and amendments) should have a moisture content 1>etw n
45 to 60 pq=t At moisture levels below 40 percent, decomposition begins to slow down.
Above 60 percent, feedstock materials tend to easily compact and water falls the interstitial
spaces between particles, leading to anaerobic conditions.
l —n
!'!'i *7. ... ..: i
0 L.
F.
ii J. 4 1 -1 e. i/A
initial composting mix must have a pH between 6.0 and 8.0. Below this range,
)organisms can die off, slowing decomposition. Above this range, nitrogen may be
I off In the form of ammonia. Litmus paper or pH meters can be used to document pH
Odors
1.'i All incoming materials (not including woody waste for amendment purposes) should
be processed and placed in a windrow, within 24 hours.
2.! Material preparation steps should be performed on an impervious surface (i.e.
concrete, asphalt, water -tight mixer box).
3.' Area should be sloped to allow leachate to be collected and prevent ponding or
leachate shall be contained in the mixer box.
4. Areas or mixer box should be periodically washed down.
1i11. AL71VE COMPOSTING
• A. 'temperature
R.
stem shall be uniformly gUable of obtaining high tMerstures (9° - 131 F1 necessary
maintain a healthy population of thermophilic microorganisms throughout the entire
nposting vessel. Freezing of material at any place within the composting vessel is not
eptable. System shall be further gapable of cont±=grm lv maintairim a =Rffature equal
or greater than. 551C (131 *Fl for a period of three consecutive days in order to satisfy
Part 503 requirement for pathogen reduction.
stem shall use a network of blowers and HDPE or PVC piping to supply oxygen to the
nposting mass. Maintenance on air distribution system shall not require more than one
it per container per compost cycle. This system shall be properly sized and operated. to
WWn an oxvgen level of between 10 jud 15 g risM within the maee. Oxygen levels can
Identified through the use of a hand held oxygen meter. Several readings are required,
at the mass core and one approximately one -foot below the mass surface.
C. Moisture
Cc Mposting mm' should be maintained at a moisture level between 40 to 60 go=. (Same
• requirement as ILD above).
I,
N,,. 4744 P. 4.!8
. Collected leachate may be used for moisture addition. Leachate not used in the feedstock
pieparetion or the active compost process must be properly treated at the treatment %cility.
D. ddor Control
i
A�l process air must be ,collected and treated. The treatment method utilized must be
properly sized, maintained, and be capable of removing in excess of 90 percent of the
odorous compounds collected.
k4uantitative assessment of odors near the compost operation would be difficult and very
expensive. The City of Hutchinson reserves the right to retain RUST E&I staff for a
qualitative assessment of odors near the compost site.
E. Agitation
I
T6 entire composting mass should be periodically mixed to minimize possibility of
dt{mping or air channeling and facilitate product consistency. The compost system supplier
shall be responsible for agitation methodology and anticipated frequency.
i
F. Vplume(Welght Reduction
While in the composting phase, vendor's system shall be capable of reducing the composting
mass by the following minimums:
1. 40 percent of volume.
2. 40 percent by weight.
TY a weight/volume reductions will be as determined 'by the difference between the
w �I .ght/volume in the incoming material and the material completing the active composting
ptJase. Incoming material and completed composting material are assumed to not include
bullang materials added to maintain structural support and material porosity.
G. Container Construction
I
1. Active composting must be conducted within an impervious container so leaohate
cannot percolate into the ground.
2. Container should be sloped a minimum of I to 2 percent to allow for the collection
ofleachate.
H. Respiration Rate
Respiration may be used as a measure of when compostable materials have decomposed
• siiriiftcantly enough to produce a stable end product. Respiration provides the rate of
3
I
Pf��: i:. i':�� :.!d Ivo. 4 ?�� • P. 5/8
Sdecomposition occurring within a compost mass by measuring either the amount of oxygen
used or carbon dioxide given off by the microbial colony. The resulting respiration rue is
usually .expressed as the amount of oxygen consumed or carbon dioxide produced per unit
Weight'& compost volatile solids per hour. Compost will be considered stable when a
silg ifieent drop in the respiration rate has occurred or when the industry guidelines projected
t0 be published by the Composting Council are met.
IV. FINISHED PRODUCT (Including Curing)
A. Compost Color
The finished product should have an earthy, dark brown color. Moisture content strongly
influences the color of compost, the wetter the material is the darker it may be. Compost
also tends to become darker as it progresses through the process. Keeping the above two
statements in mind compost will pass the color test if 1) it is dark brown in color and does
not appear overly moist (moisture drips out after squeezing). Compost will not pass if it:
1) is dark brown due to excessive moisture and 2) is light brown in color (typically indicates
material is too dry or may be immature).
i
B. Compost Moisture
• Finished product should have a moisture content ranging between 39 and 45 percent.
C. Particle Size
0
The finished product should not have large particles. The finished product should be a
marketable compost product suitable for unrestricted land application use after final
screening of bulking materials.
D. Man -Made Inerts
Finished product should not contain inert materials in quantities greater than the following
(based on particle size determined through round-hole screens).
Particle Size I)ry Weil; lRercent
up to 10 millimeters 1.0
up to 18 millimeters 2.0
up to 25 millimeters 4.0
4
• L
A). Y7 {{ .. U;'0
The density of fecal oolifonn in the finished product shall be less than 1,000 Most Probable
Numbaper gram of total solids (dry weight basis) or the density of Salmonella sp. bacteria
shall be less than three Most Probable Number per four grams of total solids (dry weight
basis).
F. Pollutant Concentration
The pollutant concentrations in the finished product shall not exceed the following (dry
weight basis):
Concentration Limit
P�Ill+ilant (mBUFRi
Arsenic
41
Cadmium
39
Chromium
1,200
Copper
1,500
Lead
300
Mercury
17
Molybdenum
75
• Nickel
420
Selenium
36
Zinc
2,800
G. Vector Attraction Reduction
One of the vector attraction reduction requirements in Part 503, Par. 503.33(b)(1) through
(bX8) shall be met. If the specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) is equal to or less than 1.5 mg
of oxygen per hour per gram of total solids (dry weight basis) at a temperature of 20 °C, the
requirement for vector attraction reduction will be met.
H. pH
The finished product shall have a pH in the range of 6.0 to B.O.
L Soluble Salts
E1'echical conductivity should be used to measure the quantity of soluble salts present in the
finished product. Compost with a high soluble sah content can be toxic to plants
(phytotoxic). The possibility for a toxic ruction can vary greatly between various plant
species, thecae, actual soluble salt coucentration may be specified by the end user. It is
recommended that the soluble salt level not to exceed 5 mmhoskam for general use compost.
5
N;a. 1�. 1994 j 8 :1"A.M
I'
• Method to measure conductivity:
•
0
N ^.4 %44 1. 1/3
1 Saturate a sample of compost in water.
I Allow the sample to equilibrate.
31 Extract the liquid and determine the electrical conductivity of the extract with a
j: conductivity probe.
I'
J. lqutrient Content
End uses may require to know the nutrient content of the finished product- It is suggested
that at least one batch of compost be tested for the following:
V.
lj Nitrogen:
I
suggested that the attached monitoring program be utilized during the demonstration
0
Total Nitrogen
• Ammonia
• Nitrate
• Nitrite
Inorganic/Organic
2
Phosphorous (P20s)
3ii''
4.1
Potassium (Ka0)
Calcium
51
Magnesium
6j
Bulk Density
I
suggested that the attached monitoring program be utilized during the demonstration
0
0
•
0
"1; r 1'394 1 i AM
1-11
Note: A batch is assumed to be the feedstock necessary to fill four containers at one time.
SUGGESTED MONPTORING PROGRAM
ActivityAIIme
Component
Analysis
Frequency
Before Composting
Sludge
Pollutants (EPA List)
Each Batch
Yard Waste
Particle-Size
Each Batch
Sludge/Yard Waste
C/N Ratio
First Two Batches
Sludge/Yard Waste
Moisture
First Two Batches
Sludge/Yard Waste
pH
Each Batch
During composting
i
j
I
Aerated Pile
Temperature
Each Batch
Aerated Pile
Oxygen
Each Batch
Aerated Pile
Moisture
Fast Two Batches
Aerated Pile
Volume Reduction
Fast Two Batches
Aerated Pile
Weight Reduction
First Two Batches
Aerated Pile
Respiration Rate
At Least One Batch
Mier C' mposting
!
Compost
Pollutants (.EPA last)
Each Batch
Compost
Pathogens
Each Batch
Compost
SOUR
Each Batch
Compost
Color
Each Batch
Compost
Moisture
First Two Batches
Compost
Man -Made Inerts
At Least One Batch
Compost
pH
Each Batch
Compost
Soluble Salts
At Least One Batch
compost
Nutrient Content
At Least One Batch
Note: A batch is assumed to be the feedstock necessary to fill four containers at one time.
N-
N4
m
P
A
It :41
a
building
Z
))an
tt scale 1: :3,5
1V
mp
my
ui
E_3
3 -
asphalt
N
f
o { 5•
I
5000 le test
• 5,e• «Du CONCRETE
_d4 f
5
n"
b'
p C ✓�b
140
E HUTCHINSON
p • •
�COWOUJ;
-r I%j U
B 4
� Y
i
L ✓mob
V
►0J
_. SITE —� PLAN
NaturTech WY 10 ,s4 sM W w O ,
•
i
•
0
COMPOST EQUIPMENT LEASE
THIS LEASE is made and entered into this _ day of November,
1994, by and between the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (City) and James McNelly, doing business as the McNelly
Group (McNelly).
RECITALS
1. The City of Hutchinson is responsible for the disposition
of certain solid wastes and sludge material and McNelly is prepared
to lease to the City certain equipment, on a demonstration project
basis, to aid and assist the City in the disposition of said
material;
2. It is necessary for the public health and welfare of the
City of Hutchinson and the City Council for the City of Hutchinson,
by authorizing and approving this agreement, specifically so finds,
to engage in new and evolutionary technology for the disposition of
solid waste material;
3. The parties hereto desire to reduce their agreement to
writing.
NOW THEREFORE FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE
ION, including
but not limited to the mutual promises set forth herein, the
parties do hereby agree as follows:
1. LEASE. McNelly agrees to deliver, install and lease
certain equipment more particularly described on Exhibit "A" which
is attached hereto and incorporated as if fully set out, to the
City of Hutchinson. The equipment shall be located as set forth in
the Site Plan, a true and correct copy which is attached hereto and
marked as Exhibit "B" and incorporated as if fully set out herein.
The equipment shall be leased to the City and its successors and
9-A, -1-
assigns for and during the full term of twenty four (24) months
beginning on January 15, 1995 with payments under said lease to be
as follows:
a. Fifteen Thousand and no /100 Dollars ($15,000.00) to be
paid on or before January 15, 1995;
b. Five Thousand and no /100 Dollars ($5,000.00) per month
commencing on February 1, 1995 and continuing on the
first of each month thereafter to and including January
1, 1997.
McNelly agrees and covenants that the City, upon payment of the
rent and compliance with this agreement, shall and may peaceably
and quietly have, hold and enjoy the use and possession of said
equipment for the full term of this agreement.
2. OPERATION AND WARRANTY. The City shall operate the
equipment in accordance with the instructions of McNelly. McNelly
warrants and represents that all goods covered by this agreement
shall conform to the specifications of the City and that any non
conforming goods will be replaced by McNelly, at McNelly's own
expense, within thirty (30) days of delivery. In the event of a
dispute as to whether goods conform to specifications, the
determination of the City shall be dispositive. McNelly guarantees
all workmanship and materials furnished pursuant to the contract
for a period of one (1) year after final written acceptance and
installation. If during the period of guarantee, any defects or
faulty materials are found, McNelly will immediately, upon written
notification, replace or repair the same at McNelly's own expense,
along with any
damage to equipment or
furnishings
owned by the City
of Hutchinson
which damage occurred
as a result
of the defective
-2-
• equipment or workmanship. If guarantees exceeding one (1) year are
called for on certain items in the specifications provided by any
manufacturer, the longer guarantees will apply.
3. CONFORMANCE TO SPECIFICATIONS. McNelly agrees that the
equipment leased to the City of Hutchinson shall perform according
to the specifications attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "C" and
incorporated as if fully set out herein. McNelly agrees that the
system will meet specifications for a period of at least two (2)
years from the date of written acceptance of final installation of
the equipment. McNelly agrees to provide whatever technical
assistance is necessary to assure compliance with the terms and
conditions of the specifications and to cure any failure to perform
according to the specifications. In addition thereto, McNelly
• agrees to provide general technical assistance to the City of
Hutchinson to assure a fully functional and operational system
which technical assistance is separate and apart from the
assistance required under the guarantee of performance according to
the specification and which assistance is limited to eight (8)
hours per week. Also in addition thereto, McNelly agrees to
furnish whatever technical assistance is necessary to install the
equipment and to make the equipment fully operational.
4. SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT. McNelly agrees that he
will not enter into any subcontract for the performance of the
services contemplated under this agreement nor assign any interest
in the contract without the prior written consent of the City,
which prior written consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In
• the event McNelly elects to assign, sell or otherwise transfer
McNelly's interest in the contract, McNelly shall remain solely
CRIM
responsible for the performance of McNelly's duties under the terms
of this agreement. The City agrees not to sell, convey or
•
otherwise transfer its interest in the equipment during the term of
this agreement without the express written consent of McNelly,
which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
5. DEFAULT. Neither party shall be held responsible for
delay or failure to perform when such delay or failure is due to
the following uncontrollable circumstances unless the act or
occurrence could have been foreseen and reasonably action could
have been taken to prevent the delay or failure: fire, flood,
epidemic, strikes, wars, acts of God, unusually severe weather,
delays or defaults caused by public carriers, providing the
defaulting party gives notice as soon as possible to the other
party of inability to perform. Unless excused by the City, default
•
as the occurrence of an uncontrollable circumstance or the City's
waiver of default, each of the following shall constitute default
on the part of McNelly: (a) The written admission by McNelly of
bankruptcy or filing of a voluntary petition for protection under
the Federal Bankruptcy Code or the filing of an involuntary
petition for protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Code unless
the same is dismissed within ninety (90) days. Notice of default
and cure provisions of this agreement do not apply to this
paragraph. (b) The making of any arrangement with or for the
benefit of McNelly's creditors involving an assignment to a
trustee, receiver or similar fiduciary. Notice of default and cure
provisions of this agreement do not apply to this paragraph. (c)
Making material misrepresentations either in the attached exhibits
•
and documents or in any other provisions or conditions relied upon
IZC
• in making this agreement. Breach by McNelly or the City of any
other provisions of this agreement shall also constitute a default.
6. FAILURE TO PERFORM ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THE CONTRACT.
Unless otherwise provided, no event shall constitute a default
giving rise to the right to terminate the agreement unless and
until written notice of default is given to the defaulting party,
specifying the particular event, series of events or failure
constituting the default, and giving the defaulting party a period
of time not to exceed sixty (60) days following receipt of written
notice of the default to cure the default. The rights and remedies
of the parties provided in this clause shall not be exclusive and
are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or
under this agreement.
• 7. FORFEITURE. Upon the occurrence of any event of default
by McNelly as specified above, and upon the failure to cure within
the appropriate period as required by this agreement, the City may
terminate this lease by giving written notice and it is hereby
agreed that the City shall have the right to retain, as liquidated
damages, the equipment set forth on Exhibit "A" to this agreement
and the value of said equipment shall not be construed to be a
penalty, but rather as liquidated damages to compensate for
additional costs and inconvenience incurred by the City.
S. DAMAGES. Both parties shall use their best efforts to
mitigate any damages which might be suffered by reason of any event
giving rise to a remedy hereunder. In the event this agreement is
terminated by reason of default, the non defaulting party may
• recover the necessary costs of termination including, but not
limited to, administrative, attorney's fees and legal costs, from
-5-
the defaulting party. Notwithstanding any other provision of the
agreement to the contrary, upon breach of the contract by McNelly, •
the City may withhold any payment due McNelly for purposes of set
off until such time as the exact amount of damages due is
determined.
9. NOTICES. All notices required or permitted under this
agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows:
TO THE CITY: Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street S.E.
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
TO McNELLY: James McNelly
d /b /a The McNelly Group
P.O. Box 7444
St. Cloud, Mn. 56302
10. MODIFICATIONS. Any alterations, variations,
modifications or waivers of the provisions of this agreement shall
only be valid when reduced to writing and signed by the authorized •
representatives of both parties.
11. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this agreement shall be
deemed severable. If any part of this agreement is rendered void,
invalid or unenforceable, such rendering shall not effect the
validity and enforcement of the remainder of the agreement unless
the part or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise
unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire
agreement with respect to either party.
12. MERGER. This contract is the final expression of the
agreement of the parties in complete and exclusive statement of the
terms agreed upon and .shall supersede all prior negotiations,
understandings or agreements. There are no representations,
warranties or stipulations, oral or written, not herein contained. •
13. DOCUMENT OWNERSHIP. Any reports, studies, photographs,
ZC
negatives or other documents prepared by McNelly in the performance
of its obligations under this agreement and used by, or delivered
to, the City shall be the exclusive property of the City and all
such materials shall be remitted to the City by McNelly upon
completion, termination or cancellation of this agreement.
14. GOVERNING LAW. This agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above
written.
• Attest:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By:
City Administrator
James McNelly, d /b /a The McNelly Group
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this day of November, 1994, before me a Notary Public,
personally appeared, and
the and
of the City of Hutchinson, municipal
corporation, to me known to be the persons who executed the
foregoing document on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
-7-
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
SS. 0COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this day of November, 1994, before me a Notary Public,
personally appeared, James McNelly, d /b /a The McNelly Group, to me
known to be the person who executed the foregoing document on
behalf of The McNelly Group.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY:
G. Barry Anderson
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Telephone (612) 587 -7575
Attorney I.D. No. 196X
0
A
•
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
111 Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 234 -4251 • (612)234.4236 • FAX: 612-234-4240
EQUAL HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY
TO: Mayor and City Council CA` /L'
FROM: Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director-
DATE: November 18, 1994
RE: Public Hearing Requirement for Establishment of Local
Preference Admission Policy at Park Towers
A new rule by HUD, Preferences for Admission to Assisted Housing,
effective August 17, 1994 states that local preferences may be
established by a Housing Authority for use in selecting tenants
from among their applicants. This new preference rule gives
HRA's more flexibility in adopting tenant selection procedures
that will meet local housing objectives. A public hearing is
required to adopt local preferences. The local preferences being
considered for adoption by our HRA Board are listed as follows:
4 points for qualifying for participation in an Assisted Living
Program. (This would apply to frail elderly who may otherwise
have to be placed in a nursing home.)
3 points for elderly, handicapped or disabled persons.
2 points for residents of Hutchinson or for those persons who
have been notified that they will be employed in Hutchinson.
1 point for near elderly (age 50 or above)
Applicants will be filed by points and then date and time.
If you have any questions about establishment of preferences for
admission to Park Towers, please feel free to call.
C
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director of P.R.C.E.
DATE: 11 -16 -94
RE: 1995 Budget
At the November P.R.C.E. Advisory Board meeting, the following motion was
made and seconded with unanimous approval; the Board recommended the
establishment of a 1.5% line item based on the proposed 1995 Parks and Recreation
Budget. This fund will be exclusively used for capitol outlay items related to facilities.
0 Discussion involved with the recommendation included:
• Approximately $18,000 would be available in the first year.
• Dollars not used would roll over into future budgets.
• Would provide a starting place for the long term integrity for the Parks and
Recreation Facilities.
• Percentage can be reviewed annually.
• Provide a measure of fiscal management responsibility.
• May eliminate future Arena type dilemmas.
• This issue has been talked about for many years.
By bringing this suggestion forward, the Board feels that it can be thoroughly
discussed prior to adoption of the 1995 Budget.
City Center Parks & Recreation Police Sen•iees
111 Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 �� %� (612) 587 -2242
Fax(612)234 -4240 Fax(612)234 -4240 �/ Fax(612)587 -6427
Primed nra wrcrfed nme�-
hutchinson
community
• hospital
burns manor nursing home
1095 Highway 15 South • Hutchinson, MN 55350 • 612/234 -5000
November 17, 1994
The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and
Members of the City Council
Hutchinson Citv Center
I I I Hassan St. S.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members:
The board of directors of Hutchinson Community Hospital/Bums Manor Nursing Home, as part of their regular
meeting on November 15, considered the results of a bidding process for purchase of an automated medication
system for the hospital's pharmacy services area.
The following reflects the discussion of the matter:
"Pharmacy Automated Medication System Bid Results. Results of the recent bidding process for an
automated medication dispensing system were presented to the board, who had given approval at the October
meeting to obtain bids. Rationale for the requested purchase included savings of nursing and pharmacy staff
time along with savings in supply costs and increased capture of drug charges.
"Bids were requested of three manufacturers, and two bids were received and considered: Sure -Med, a
Baxter Healthcare Company, at a bid price of $65,000, and Pyxis Corporation, at a bid price of $33,414.40
(through Allina's VHA group purchasing contract).
"This item was budgeted for 1994 at an expected cost of $50,000. The low bid price would provide an
estimated payback of 1.1 years.
"Following discussion:
"Motion was made by Erickson, seconded by Mills, to recommend to the City Council
acceptance of the low bid of $33,414.40 from Pyxis Corporation for purchase of an
automated medication system for pharmacy services. All were in favor. Motion carried."
Thank you for your consideration of this request. Don Erickson will be able to answer any questions you may have
regarding this equipment at your next regular meeting. If I can answer further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/
,B) tNS MANOR NURSING HOME
Philip G. raves
President
PGG:lh % 1�
•
1
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL/
BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME
Pharmacy Automated Medication Station
Action Approval to request bids for purchase of an automated medication
Requested: system with electronic tracking and billing.
Background: The present system of stocking controlled drugs and other
emergency and stock medications at the main nursing station is
outdated and costly. Shift counts are required every eight hours for
controlled drugs along with a complex paper trail. Emergency drugs
are placed in plastic bags and then stocked for billing. Some stickers
are lost; therefore, billing is also lost for these drugs. manual
inventories by pharmacy staff are done twice per day to assure they
have sufficient drugs to meet the needs of the patients. Billing for
these drugs is done by hand.
Strategic The medication system will track and bill all the nursing station
Consideration medications electronically. Each dose removed from the system is
billed to the proper patient. All controlled drugs are accounted for,
including waste and shift counts are not needed. Inventory is
maintained by the computer; therefore, the exact amount needed is
available in seconds. This system saves nursing and pharmacy time
along with saving supply costs and capturing all charges.
Other
Information:
Summary of
Financial Impact:
1. The new system can be expanded to other areas of the hospital.
2. This system can also control IV solutions and supplies, ER meds,
etc.
3. This system comes with five years of free upgrades.
4. Nursing and pharmacy productivity will improve by reducing and
eliminating time- consuming distribution tasks.
5. Real time inventory is possible.
6. Charge capture is increased.
Approximate Cost:
Payback: 1.1 years
Budgeted Amount:
N
$33,414
$50,000
M E M O R A N D U M
November 16, 1994
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: LIQUOR STORE UPDATE /REPORTING AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
On November 9 Don Erickson, Ken Merrill, Neil Wegner, and I met to
review the monthly liquor store results through September 1994.
Attached is the detailed review at the meeting. The April and
September reports have two measurements, one based on physical and
one based on perpetual inventory, respectively.
It was a consensus to have quarterly reporting in 1995 on several
"key indicators," among which include quarterly sales, quarterly
gross profit percent, quarterly net income, and quarterly labor as
to sales. Once we have sufficient data from "same quarter /prior
year," we may be able to identify /graph some of these results more
accurately showing seasonal comparisons.
Additional areas that Neil will be monitoring internally on an
ongoing basis include personnel cost as a percent of gross sales
and a continuous inventory measurement (hand held computer).
It was agreed there will be a physical inventory at the end of
1994. Data comparisons will be made with benchmarks established by
Charles Grinstead's Report (1993) , after the 1994 year end physical
inventory. The next quarterly report will be completed by late
January 1995.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact either Neil, Ken,
or myself.
Attachment
/mj s
0 Cih' Center
I l l Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(612) 587 -5151
Fax(612)234 -4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(612) 587 -2975
Fax(612)234 -4240
- Printed on rervried pver -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(612) 587 -2242
/ _ �, Fax (612) 587 -6427
OTHER - REVENUES /EXPENSES
MISC. - Lottery 516.58
Sale of Property 0.00
Contributions & Donations 0.00
INTEREST - INCOME 304.31
INTEREST-EXPENSE (1,250.00)
TOTAL OTHER (42911)
NET INCOME 5,494.15
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m & e Recon.
COS T. Exp les 146,592.44 339.76
P.I. 107,473.10 124,935.48
Cos 124,935.48 145,682.20
85,816.14 39,119.34 146,592.44 0.00
/D -A
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
January 1994
1994
5, = S
LIQUOR
44,467.07
WINE
10,269.55
BEER
54,032.09
MISCELLANEOUS
3,790.58
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
(412.93)
TOTAL
112,146.36
COST OF SALES
85,816.14
GROSS PROFIT
26,330.22
23.48%
OPERATING
EXPENSE
SALARIES
8,429.31
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
2,031.32
OPERATING SUPPLIES
149.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
216.24
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
0.00
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
0.00
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
0.00
DEPRECIATION 1,899.75 per month
1,899.75
COMMUNICA
12.76
UTILITIES
998.89
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
779.44
PRINTING
0.00
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
67425
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
0.00
ADVERTISING
4,055.58
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
0.00
RENTALS
0.00
MISC.
1,110.37
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 0.00
20,406.96
OPERATING
INCOME 0.00
5,923.26
OTHER - REVENUES /EXPENSES
MISC. - Lottery 516.58
Sale of Property 0.00
Contributions & Donations 0.00
INTEREST - INCOME 304.31
INTEREST-EXPENSE (1,250.00)
TOTAL OTHER (42911)
NET INCOME 5,494.15
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m & e Recon.
COS T. Exp les 146,592.44 339.76
P.I. 107,473.10 124,935.48
Cos 124,935.48 145,682.20
85,816.14 39,119.34 146,592.44 0.00
/D -A
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
February 1994
19°4
SALES
LIQUOR
86,624.50
WINE
21,228.80
BEER
109,125.03
MISCELLANEOUS
7,734.04
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
(958.09)
TOTAL
223,754.28
COST OF SALES
170,818.01
GROSS PROFIT
52,936.27
23.66%
OPERATING EXPENSE
SALARIES
15,893.91
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
3,817.08
OPERATING SUPPLIES
171.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
216.24
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
0.00
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
765.05
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
0.00
DEPRECIATION 1,899.75 per month
3,799.50
COMMUNICA
124.37
UTILITIES
2,199.43
V,,AINTENANCE & ALARM
3,390.66
PRINTING
000 0
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
724.25
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
0.00
ADVERTISING
5,458.68
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
0.00
RENTALS
28.76
MISC.
1,110.37
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 000
37,750.05
OPERATING INCOME 0.00
15,186.22
OTHER REVE ENUES /E XPENSES
MISC. - Lottery 1,989.88
Sale of Property 000
Contrib-itions & Donations 0.00
INTEREST - INCOME 563.94
INTEREST-EXPENSE (2,500.00)
TOTAL OTHER 53.82
NET INCOME 15,240.04
E
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS 397.44
217,536.05
255,683.54
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
530.93
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
0.00
March 1994
1994
SALES
5,38169
LIQUOR
132,063.96
WINE
33,306.11
BEER
175,555.42
MISCELLANEOUS
12,049.07
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
(1,589.94)
TOTAL
351,384.62
COST OF SALES
266,526.63
GROSS PROFIT
84,857.99
24.15%
OPERATING EXPENSE
SALARIES
23,418.93
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
5,631.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1,319.58
OFFICE SUPPLIES
216.24
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
0.00
LOGIS - COMPUT'R OPERATIONS
1,837.37
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
000
DEPRECIATION 1,899.75 per month
5,699.25
COMMUNICA
216.91
UTILITIES
3,142.57
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
3,928.38
PRINTING
0.00
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
1,398.50
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
116.00
ADVERTISING
7,382.42
DUES &SUBSCRITIONS
0.00
RENTALS
28.76
MISC.
1,127.32
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 0.00
55,513.23
OPERATING INCOME 0.00
29,344.76
OTHER - Revenues/Expenses
MISC - Lottery
530.93
Sale of Property
0.00
Contributions & Donations
000
INTEREST - INCOME
5,38169
INTEREST-EXPENSE
(3,750.00)
TOTAL OTHER
2,162.62
NET INCOME 31,507.38
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
ni
COS
651.65
exp 385,949.96
326,035.08
pl 325,789.86
382,199.96
Cos 59,508.45
eCUip 651.65
385,949.96
1,022,349.66
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
April 1994 (using perpetual inventory) 1994
SALES
LIQUOR
179,251.22
WINE
49,052.85
BEER
251,251.92
MISCELLANEOUS
16,646.40
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
(2,837.79)
TOTAL
493,364.60
COST OF SALES
378,833.85
GROSS PROFIT
114,530.75
TOTAL OTHER
23.21%
OPERATING EXPENSE
SALARIES
35, 808.02
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
8,548.42
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1,876.61
OFFICE SUPPLIES
373.74
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
0.00
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
1,837.37
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
0.00
DEPRECIATION 1,899.75 per month
7,599.00
COMMUNICA
328.24
UTILITIES
4,128.55
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
3,970.98
PRINTING
0.00
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
5,824.75 qW
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
116.00
ADVERTISING
7,891.02
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
0.00
RENTALS
28.76
misc.
1,143.35
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
79,524.81
OPERATING INCOME
$35,005.94
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
533.93
Sale of Property
0.00
Contributions & Donations
0.00
INTEREST - INCOME
2,485.36
INTEREST-EXPENSE
(5,000.00)
TOTAL OTHER
(1,980.71)
NET INCOME
$33,025.23
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
0.00
m &e
Cos
651.65
exp
507,999.49
422,823.03
pl
463,358.66
502,999.49
Cos
43,989.18
equip
651.65
507,999.49
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES April 1994 (using physical inventory) 1994
LIQUOR 179,251.22
WINE 49,052.85
BEER 251,251.92
MISCELLANEOUS 16,646.40
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS (2,837.79)
TOTAL 493,364.60
COST OF SALES 396,656.99
GROSS PROFIT
96,707.61
OPERATING
19.60%
EXPENSE
SALARIES
35, 808.02
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
8,548.42
OPERATING SUPPLIES
1,876.61
OFFICE SUPPLIES
373.74
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
0.00
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
1,837.37
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
0.00
DEPRECIATION 1,899.75 per month
7,599.00
COMMUNICA
328.24
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
4,128.55
3,970.98
PRINTING
0.00
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
5,824.75
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
116.00
ADVERTISING
7,891.02
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
0.00
RENTALS
28.76
MISC.
1,143.35
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
79,524.81
OPERATING
INCOME
$17,182.80
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
533.93
Sale of Property
0.00
Contributions & Donations
0.00
INTEREST - INCOME
2,485.36
INTEREST-EXPENSE
(5,000.00)
TOTAL OTHER
(1,980.71)
NET INCOME
$15,202.09
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m & e
0.00
COS
exp
651.65
pl
507,999.49
422,823.03
Cos
481,181.80
502,999.49
equip
26,166.04
651.65
507,999.49
CITY OF HUTCH INSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES May 1994 using perpetual system
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
OPERATING
GROSS PROFIT
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING
INCOME
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTALOTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pl
700,240.27
cos
607,839.99
equip
83,110.86
cap equip
9,289.42
700,240.27
1,899.75 per month
1994
226,911.77 i
63,414.75
345,791.95
23,560.81
(3,928.39)
655,750.89
505,286.10
150,464.79
22.95°
44,445.49
10,491.34
2,732.61
373.74
0.00
1,837.37
50.00
0.00
9,498.75
494.58
4,911.16
4,060.96.
23.31
7,889.00
129.00
8,753.78
378.00
56.45
1,428.35
97,553.89
$52,910.90
2,339,87
0.00
0.00
2,686.81
(5,000.00)
26.68
$52,937.58
9,289.42
588,396.96
695,240.27
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES June 1994 using perpetual system
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
OPERATING
GROSS PROFIT
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE &ALARM
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING
INCOME
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pl
854,523.14
Cos
765,348.16
equip
78,376.98
cap equip
10,798.00
854,523.14
1,899.75 per month
1994
274,567.62
78,474.06
448,600.81
31,953.46
(4,987.18)
828,608.77
638,432.64
190,176.13
22.95%
53,691.20
11, 598.29
3,752.15
373.74
0.00
1,837.37
50.00
0.00
11, 398.50
607.33
5,777.33
4,969.60
96.80
9,953.25
129.00
9,599.16
378.00
56.45
5,147.35
119,415.52
$70,760.61
2,621.62
0.00
5000
2,903.15
(7,500.00)
(1,925.23)
$68,835.38
0.00
10, 798.00
716,809.62
847,023.14
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES July 1994 using perpetual system
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
OPERATING
GROSS PROFIT
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING
INCOME
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pl 1, 055, 357.52
Cos 934,336.91
equip 90,153.59
PRIN 20,000.00
cap equip 10,867.10
1, 055, 357.60
1,899.75 per month
1994
328,237.21
93,822.49
551,65&30
40,780.10
(6,155.56)
1, 008, 342.54
777.364.67
230,977.87
22.91%
62.158.28
14,050.44
4,125.80
373.74
0.00
3,450.74
50.00
0.00
13.298.25
892.70
7,124.11
5,081.89
96.80
14,649.25
129.00
9,959.36
37800
56.45
5,147.35
141,022.16
$89,955.71
3,358.62
0.00
50.00
3,098.13
(15.950.00)
(9,443.25)
$80.512.46
7.98%
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES August 1994 using perpetual system
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
OPERATING
GROSS PROFIT
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALLTOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE &ALARM
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING
INCOME
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pi 1,188,432.87
cos 1,080,043.74
equip 77,522.12
PRIN 20,000.00
cap equip 10,867.10
1,188,432.95
1,899.75 per month
Mier
377,793.51
108, 790.57
643,329.73
48,558.23
(7,039.01)
171, 433.03
904, 991.14
266,441.89
22.74%
71, 419.75
16,075.59
4,490.72
373.74
0.00
3,450.74
50.00
0.00
15,379.00
1,003.64
8,305.40
5,619.98
96.80
15, 391.25
129.00
10,469.14
378.00
89.41
5,147.35
157,869.51
5108,572.38
3,133.95
0.00
210.00
2,743.12
(17,183 00)
(11,095.93)
$97,476.45
z�
8.32%
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES September 1994 using perpetual system
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
GROSS PROFIT
OPERATING
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE & ALARM
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING
INCOME
OTHER - Re,:enues /Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST- EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pl 1,326,361.58
cos 1,225,755.86
equip 69,738.71
PRIN 20,000.00
cap equip 10,867.10
1,326,361.66
1,899 75 per month
1994
431,605.98
123,000.76
730,628.41
55, 941.23
(8,835.12)
332,341.26
1, 028, 718.74
303,622.52
22.79%
80,168.41
18,038.53
4,744.87
403.73
0.00
4,531.54
50.00
0.00
17,459.75
1,130.45
9,505.31
6,615.44
96.80
19,080.25
129.00
10, 982.19
378.00
89.41
5,217.35
178,621.03
$125,001.49
2,903.09
0.00
210.00
2,998.28
(18,416.00)
(12,304.63)
$112,696.86
8.46%
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
SALES September 1994 using physical inventory of 10.13194
1994
LIQUOR
431,605.98
WINE
123,00036
BEER
730,628.41
MISCELLANEOUS
55,941.23
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
(8,835.12)
TOTAL
1,332,34126
COST OF SALES
1,038,86315
GROSS PROFIT
293,478.11
OPERATING
22.03%
EXPENSE
SALARIES
80,168.41
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7.37%
18,038.53
OPERATING SUPPLIES
4,744.87
OFFICE SUPPLIES
403.73
CLOTHING a PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
000
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
4,531.54
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
50.00
SMALL TOOLS
0.00
DEPRECIATION
17,459.75
COMMUNICA
1,130.45
UTILITIES
9,505.31
MAINTENANCE &ALARM , 6,615.44
PRINTING 9680
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 19,080.25
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES 129.00
ADVERTISING 10,982.19
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS 378.00
RENTALS 8941
misc. 5, 217.35
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE 178,621.03
OPERATING
INCOME $114,857.08
OTHER - Revenues/ Expenses
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
m &e
COS
exp
pl 1,326,361.58
Cos ERR
equip ERR
PRIN 20,000.00
cap equip 10,867.10
ERR
t F 'yw�t
Ail' .(1 <s:t
2,903.09
0.00
210.00
2,998.28
(18,416 00)
(12,304.63)
$102,552.45
7.70%
4�
E
•
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
By and Between
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AND
AUGUSTA BUILDING CORPORATION
This document was drafted by
Public Resource Group, Inc.
4205 Lancaster Lane North
Suite 1100
Minneapolis, MN 55441
�r
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the day of
, 19 , by and between the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota (the "City "), a municipal corporation, and Augusta
Building Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, (the "Developer "),
its successors and assigns.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to
469.134, the City has formed Development District No. 1 (the
"Development District "); and .
u
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.174 through 469.179 as amended, (hereinafter the "Tax
Increment Act "), the City has created a Tax Increment Financing
District No. 8 (the "Tax Increment District "), and has adopted a
tax increment financing plan (the "Tax Increment Plan ") and amended
the development program for the Development District (the
"Development Program ") to provide for the use of tax increment
assistance in connection with development within the Tax Increment
District; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objections of the Development is
Program and particularly to make the land in the Development
District available for development by private enterprise in
conformance with the Development Program, the City has determined
to assist the Developer with the financing of a portion of the
costs of the Site Improvements on the Development Property (as
defined herein) as more particularly set forth in this Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the City believes that the development and
construction of a certain Project (as defined herein), and
fulfillment of this Agreement are vital and are in the best
interests of the City and the health, safety, morals, and welfare
of residents of the City, and in accordance with the public purpose
and provisions of the applicable state and local laws and
requirements under which the Project has been undertaken and is
being assisted.
WHEREAS, as a substantial inducement for the city entering
into this Agreement the Developer has represented to the City that
the Improvements (as defined herein) once available for occupancy
will at all times during the term of the Agreement be operated in
such a manner as to satisfy the income requirements of a qualified
residential rental project as defined in Section 142(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, subject to the •
modifications to such requirement provided in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.1761, and in such a manner that the Tax Increment
Financing District (as herein defined) constitutes a "qualified
housing district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399,
subdivision 1(d).
• NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the
mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby
covenant and agree with the other as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used and
not otherwise defined herein shall have the following meanings
unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context:
Agreement means this Agreement, as the same may be from time
to time modified, amended, or supplemented;
Assessment Agreement means the agreement, substantially in the
form of the agreement contained in Exhibit A attached hereto and
hereby made a part of this Agreement, among the Developer, the
City, and the Assessor for the County, entered into pursuant to
Article VII of this Agreement;
Assessor's Minimum Market Value means the agreed minimum
• market value of the Development Property for calculation of real
property taxes as determined by the Assessor for the County
pursuant to the Assessment Agreement;
City means the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota;
Code means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended;
Completion Date means June 30, 1995;
Construction Plans means the plans, specifications, drawings
and related documents of the construction work to be performed by
the Developer on the Project; the plans (a) shall be as detailed
as the plans, specifications, drawings and related documents which
are submitted to the building inspector of the City, and (b) shall
include at least the following: (1) site plan; (2) foundation
plan; (3) basement plans; (4) floor plan for each floor; (5)
cross sections of each (length and width); (6) elevations (all
sides); (7) landscape plan; and (8) fire alarms, smoke detectors,
and water sprinkler systems;
County means McLeod County, Minnesota;
Developer means Augusta Building Corporation, its successors
and assigns, including, but not limited to Norwest Bank Minnesota
• Central, National Association, and Crow River Apartments, L.P. its
successors and assigns;
Development District means the real property described in the
Development Program;
Development Program means the development program approved in
connection with the Development District; 0
Development Property means the real property legally described
in Exhibit A of this Agreement;
Event of Default means any of the events described in Section
6.1;
HRA means the Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority;
Improvements means the 56 -unit townhome facility to be located
on the Development Property;
Net Proceeds means any proceeds paid by an insurer to the
Developer or the City under a policy or policies of insurance
required to be provided and maintained by the Developer pursuant to
Article V of this Agreement and remaining after deducting all
expenses (including fees and disbursements of counsel) incurred in
the collection of such proceeds;
Permanent Mortgage means mortgage secured after completion
date from a financial institution, including but not limited to,
Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association;
Proiect means the construction of a 56 -unit townhome facility
by the Augusta Building Corporation;
Site Improvements means the soil, site preparation, parking
lots, curb and gutter, lighting, utilities, landscaping, and
demolition expenses for the Project;
State means the State of Minnesota;
Tax Increments means the tax increments derived from the
Development Property and received and retained by the City and
computed in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Section 469.177;
Tax Increment Act means the Tax Increment Financing Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, as amended;
Tax Increment District means the Tax Increment Financing
District number 8 of the City established pursuant to the Tax
Increment Financing Plan;
Tax Increment Financing Plan means the plan approved for the
Tax Increment District.
•
ARTICLE II
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
Section 2.1. Representations and Warranties of the City. The
City makes the following representations and warranties:
(1) The City is a municipal corporation and has the power to
enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder.
(2) The Tax Increment District was created, adopted, and
approved in accordance with the terms of the Tax Increment Act.
(3) The development contemplated by this Agreement is in
conformance with the development objectives set forth in the
Development Program.
Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties or the Developer.
The Developer makes the following representations and warranties:
(1) The Developer has power to enter into this Agreement and
to perform its obligations hereunder and is not in violation of the
laws of the State.
• (2) The Developer will cause the Project to be constructed in
accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Development
Program, and all local, state, and federal laws and regulations
(including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, energy
conservation, building code and public health laws and
regulations).
(3) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the
fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with or results in
a breach of, the terms, conditions, or provision of any contractual
restriction, evidence of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of
whatever nature to which the Developer is now a party or by which
it is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing.
(4) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City with
respect to any litigation commenced with respect to the Project.
(5) The Developer will cooperate fully with the City in
resolution of any traffic, parking, trash removal or public safety
prob' which may arise in connection with the operation of the
Improvements.
(6) The Minimum Improvements will be constructed at a cost of
approximately $2,710,000 (which figure includes the costs to the
Developer of real and personal property). The Developer will spend
enough in construction of the Minimum Improvements, when combined
with the value of the Development Property and related site
improvements, to generate the Assessor's Minimum Market Value set
forth in Section 7.1 of this Agreement.
(7) The Developer has not received any notice from any local, •
state, or federal official that the activities of the Developer or
the City with respect to the Development Property may or will be in
violation of any environmental law or regulation (other than those
notices, if any, of which the City has been notified). The
Developer is not aware of any state or federal claim filed or
planned to be filed by any party relating to any violation of any
local, state, or federal environmental law, regulation or review
procedure, and the Developer is not aware of any violation of any
local, state, or federal law, regulation or review procedure which
would give any person a valid claim under the Minnesota
Environmental Rights Act or other state or federal environmental
statute.
(8) The Developer would not undertake the Project without the
financing provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement.
(9) The Project will be substantially completed by June 30,
1995.
(10) The Developer estimates that the Assessor's Minimum
Market Value set forth in Section 7.1 of this Agreement is a
reasonable estimate of the annual market value for ad valorem tax
purposes.
0 1) The Developer represents that the Improvements once •
available for occupancy will at all times during the term of this
Agreement be operated in such a manner as to satisfy the income
requirements for a qualified residential rental property, as
defined in Section 142(d) of the Code, subject to the modifications
to such requirement provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.1761, and in such a manner that the Tax Increment District will
at all times during its existence constitute a "qualified housing
district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subdivision
1(d).
0 ARTICLE III
UNDERTAKINGS BY DEVELOPER AND CITY
Section 3.1. Statement of Intent. It is the intent of the
parties that the assistance to be provided by the City be in the
nature of a reimbursement to the Developer for a portion of the
costs related to Site Improvements. This reimbursement, as
detailed in Section 3.2 shall total $291,141,plus simple interest
at the rate of 10.81% per annum from the date of completion of the
Project.
Section 3.2 Reimbursement of Site Improvement Costs; Methods
of Payment.
(1) The sole source of funds from which the City is obligated
to reimburse the Developer for a portion of the costs of the
Development Property and Site Improvements is limited to Tax
Increments, and nothing herein shall be construed to obligate the
City to use any of its general funds or other municipal funds to
reimburse the Developer for such costs.
(2) Provided that the Developer is in full compliance with
its obligations under Section 3.4 hereof and no Event of Default
shall have occurred and be continuing hereunder, the City shall
reimburse the Developer $291,141 plus simple interest at the rate
of 10.81% per annum from the date of completion of the Project.
These reimbursements are for the Site Improvement, payable from Tax
Increments in the following manner:
If the Tax Increments as received and retained by the
City on an annual basis for the years 1996 through and
including 2017 are $44,000 or greater, the City shall pay
the Developer on February 1 in the years 1996 through
2017 an amount equal to not more than $40,000 each year,
as set forth in Exhibit B. Should the increment received
by the City be less than $44,000, the City's annual
payment to the Developer shall be reduced by the same
percentage that the City's increment is reduced from
$44,000. The developer shall not receive total payments
from the City in excess of eligible costs of $291,141,
plus simple interest at the rate of 10.81% per annum from
the date of completion of the Project. If, in any case,
the increment received by the City is less than $20,000,
the developer will not receive any site cost
<imbursement. The City shall receive a minimum of 10%
of the gross increment for administrative purposes.
• At no time shall the Developer receive reimbursement that
would generate a net income before debt service that is
greater than 130% of the original total permanent mortgage
debt service.
Section 3.3. Use of Tax Increments. The City shall be free
to use the Tax Increments, other than those to which the Developer .
is entitled pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.2 hereof, for
any purpose for which the Tax Increments may lawfully be used
pursuant to applicable provisions of Minnesota law.
Section 3.4. Qualification of Tax Increment District as
Housing District and Qualified Housing District. For the purpose
of satisfying the requirements of Section 469.1761, subdivision 3,
with respect to the occupancy of the Improvements, and qualifying
the Tax Increment District as a "qualified housing district" under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subdivision 1(d), the
Developer represents, covenants and agrees as follows:
(1) Once any of the Improvements are available for occupancy
the Developer will at all times during the term of this agreement
operate the Improvements in a manner such that the occupancy of the
Improvements complies with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.1761, subdivision 3.
(2) The Developer will obtain and maintain on file a current
income certification from each lower- income tenant residing in the
Improvements and such other certification as may be requested by
the City or as may be required by applicable rules, rulings,
procedures, official statements, regulations or policies now or
hereafter promulgated or proposed by the Department of the Treasury
or the Internal Revenue Service with respect to qualified
residential rental projects as defined in Section 142(d) of the
Code.
(3) The Grantee will permit, upon not less than 24 hours'
notice and during regular business hours, any duly authorized
representative of the City or the HRA to inspect the books and
records of the Developer pertaining to the incomes of lower- income
tenants residing in the Improvement.
(4) The Developer will prepare and submit to the HRA on
January 31 of each year during the term of this Agreement a
certificate executed by the Developer stating the percentage of
dwelling units of the Improvement which were occupied by lower -
income tenants at all times during the 12 -month period preceding
the date of such certificate.
(5) For purposes of monitoring the compliance by the Developer
wit the requirements of this Section 3.4, the Developer agrees to
pay to the HRA an administrative fee of $10.00 per low - income unit
on each January 31.
•
ARTICLE IV
CONSTRUCTION OF MINIMUM IMPROVEMENTS
Section 4.1. Construction of Minimum Improvements. The
Developer agrees that it will cause the Minimum Improvements to be
constructed on the Development Property in conformance with the
approved Construction Plans. The Developer agrees that the scope
and scale of the Minimum Improvements to be constructed shall not
be significantly less than the scope and scale of the Minimum
Improvements as detailed and outlined in the Construction Plans.
Section 4.2. Construction Plans. The Developer shall cause
Construction Plans to be provided to the City which shall be
subject to approval by the City as provided in this Section 4.2.
The Construction Plans shall provide for the Minimum Improvements
to be constructed on the Development Property, and shall be in
conformity with the Development Program, this Agreement, and all
applicable state and local laws and regulations. The City shall
approve the Construction Plans in writing if: (a) the Construction
. Plans conform to the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (b)
the Construction Plans conform to the terms and conditions of the
Development Program; (C) to the best of the City's knowledge, the
Construction Plans conform to all applicable federal, state, and
local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, and City permit
requirements; (d) the Construction Plans are adequate for purposes
of this Agreement to provide for the construction of the Minimum
Improvements; and (e) no Event of Default under the terms of this
Agreement has occurred; provided however, that any such approval of
the Construction Plan pursuant to this Section 4.2 shall constitute
approval for the purposes of this Agreement only and shall not be
deemed to constitute approval or waiver by the City with respect to
any building, fire, zoning, or other ordinances or regulations of
the City, and shall not be deemed to be sufficient plans to serve
as the basis for, the issuance of a building permit if the
Construction Plans are not as detailed or complete as the plans
otherwise required for the insurance of a building permit. The
site plan submitted for the Development Property by the Developer
to the building inspector of the City shall be adequate to serve as
the Construction Plans, if such site plan fulfills the requirements
of this Section 4.2 and is approved by the building inspector.
•
The Construction Plans must be rejected in writing by the City •
within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 45 days. If the
City rejects the Construction Plans in whole or in part, the
Developer shall submit new or corrected Construction Plans within
thirty (30) days after receipt by the Developer of written
notification of the rejection, accompanied by a written statement
of the City specifying the respects in which the Construction Plans
submitted by the Developer fail to conform to the requirements of
this Section 4.2. The provisions of this Section 4.2 relating to
approval, rejection, and resubmission of corrected Construction
Plans shall continue to apply until the Construction Plans have
been approved by the City; provided, however, that in any event the
Developer shall submit Construction Plans which are approved prior
to commencement of construction of the Minimum Improvements.
Approval of the Construction Plans by the City shall not relieve
the Developer of any obligation to comply with the terms and
provisions of this Agreement, or the provision of applicable
federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, nor
shall approval of the Construction Plans by the City be deemed to
constitute a waiver of any Event of Default.
If the Developer desires to make any material change in the
Construction Plans after their approval by the City, the Developer
shall submit the proposed change to the City for its approval. If
the Construction Plans, as modified by the proposed change, conform
to the approval criteria listed in this Section 4.2 with respect to •
the original Construction Plans and do not constitute a material
modification to the scope, size, or use of the Project or to the
site plan therefor, the City shall approve the proposed change.
Such change in the Construction Plans shall be deemed approved by
the City unless rejected in writing within a reasonable period of
time by the City with a statement of the City's reasons for such
rejection.
Approval of Construction Plans hereunder is solely for
purposes of this Agreement, and shall not constitute approval for
any other City purpose nor subject the City to any liability for
the project as constructed.
Section 4.3. Commencement and Completion of Construction.
The Developer shall cause construction of the Minimum Improvements
to be commenced by
December 1, 1994. Subject to Unavoidable Delays, the Developer
shall have substantially completed the Minimum Improvements by June
30, 1995. All work with respect to the Minimum Improvements to be
constructed or provided by the Developer on the Development
Property shall be in conformity with the Construction Plans as
submitted by the Developer and approved by the City.
The Developer agrees that it shall permit designated •
representatives of the City to enter upon the Development Property
during the construction of the Minimum Improvements to inspect such
construction.
SARTICLE V
INSURANCE AND CONDEMNATION
Section 5.1. Insurance.
(1) The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be
maintained at all times during the process of constructing the
Minimum Improvements (an, from time to time at the request of the
City, furnish the City with proof of payment of premiums on):
(A) Builder's risk insurance, written on the so- called
"Builder's Risk -- Completed Value Basis," in an amount equal
to one hundred percent (100 %) of the insurable value of the
Minimum Improvements at the date of completion, and with
coverage available in nonreporting form on the so- called "all
risk" form of policy; the interest of the City shall be
protected in accordance with a clause in form and content
satisfactory to the City;
(B) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including
operations, contingent liability, operations of
• subcontractors, completed operations and contractual liability
insurance) together with an Owner's Contractor's Policy with
limits against bodily injury and property damage of not less
than $500,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above -
required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be
used); and
(C) Worker's compensation insurance, with statutory
coverage.
(2) Upon completion of construction of the Minimum
Improvements and prior to the Termination Date, the Developer shall
maintain, or cause to be maintained, at its cost and expense (and
from time to time at the request of the City shall furnish proof of
the payment of premiums on) insurance as follows:
(A) Insurance against loss and /or damage to the Minimum
Improvements under a policy or policies covering such risks as
are ordinarily insured against by similar businesses,
including (without limiting the generality of the foregoing)
fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief,
explosion, water damage, demolition cost, debris removal, and
7llapse in an amount not less than the full insurable
replacement value of the Minimum improvements, but any such
policy may have a deductible amount of not more than $50,000.
No policy of insurance shall be so written that the proceeds
thereof will produce less than the minimum coverage required
by the preceding sentence, by reason of co- insurance
provisions or otherwise, without the prior consent thereto in
writing by the City. The term "full insurable replacement
value" shall mean the actual replacement cost of the
Minimum Improvements (excluding foundation and excavation
costs and costs of underground flues, pipes, drains, and other
uninsurable items) and equipment, and shall be determined from
time to time at the request of the City, but not more
frequently than once every three years, by an insurance
consultant or insurer selected and paid for by the Developer
and approved by the City. All policies evidencing insurance
required by this subparagraph (A) with respect to the Minimum
Improvements shall be carried in the names of the Developer,
the City, and the holder of the First Mortgage, as their
respective interests may appear.
(B) Comprehensive general public liability insurance,
including personal injury liability for injuries to persons
and /or property, including any injuries resulting from the
operation of automobiles or other motorized vehicles on or
about the Development Property, in the minimum amount for each
occurrence and for each year of $1,000,000, and shall be
endorsed to show the City as an additional insured.
(C) Such other insurance, including worker's
compensation insurance respecting all employees of the
Developer, in such amount as is customarily carried by like
organizations engaged in like activities of comparable size
and liability exposure; provided that the Developer may be
self- insured with respect to all or any part of its liability
for worker's compensation. .
(3) All insurance required by this Article V shall be taken
out and maintained in responsible insurance companies selected
by the Developer which are authorized under the laws of the
State to assume the risks covered thereby. The Developer will
deposit annually with the City copies of policies evidencing
all such insurance, or a certificate or certificates or
binders of the respective insurers stating that such insurance
is in force and effect. Unless otherwise provided in this
Article V, each policy shall contain a provision that the
insurer shall not cancel or modify it without giving written
notice to the Developer and the City at least thirty (30) days
before the cancellation or modification becomes effective.
Not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any
policy, the Developer shall furnish the City evidence
satisfactory to the City that the policy has been renewed or
replaced by another policy conforming to the provisions of
this Article V, or that there is no necessity therefor under
the terms hereof. In lieu of separate policies, the Developer
may maintain a single policy, or blanket or umbrella policies,
or a combination thereof, which provide the total coverage
required herein, in which even the Developer shall deposit
with the City respective insurers as to the amount of coverage
in force upon the Minimum Improvements.
0
(4) The Developer agrees to notify the City immediately in
the case of damage exceeding $50,000 in amount to, or
destruction of, the Minimum Improvements or any portion
thereof resulting from fire or other casualty. In the event
that any such damage does not exceed $100,000, Net Proceeds of
any such insurance shall be paid directly to the Developer,
and the Developer will forthwith repair, reconstruct, and
restore the Minimum Improvements to substantially the same or
an improved condition or value as they existed prior to the
extent causing such damage and, to the extent necessary to
accomplish such repair, reconstruction and restoration, the
Developer will apply the Net Proceeds of any insurance
relating to such damage received by the Developer to the
payment or reimbursement of the costs thereof.
Net proceeds of any insurance relating to damage or
destruction to the Minimum Improvements or any portion thereof as
a result of fire or other casualty in an amount estimated to equal
or exceed $100,000 shall be payable to a trustee jointly agreed
upon by the Developer, the City, and the holder of the first
Mortgage (or in such other manner as may be agreeable to the City,
Developer, and holder) and shall be subject to such disbursement
provisions as shall be jointly agreed by the City, the Developer,
and the holder of the First Mortgage. In the even the Minimum
• Improvements or any portion thereof are destroyed by fire or other
casualty and the damage or destruction is estimated to equal or
exceed $50,000, then the Developer shall within ninety (90) days
after such damage or destruction, commence to repair, reconstruct,
and restore the damaged Minimum Improvements to substantially the
same or improved condition or utility value as they existed prior
to the even causing such damage or destruction and, to the extent
necessary to accomplish such repair, reconstruction and
restoration, the Developer will apply the Net Proceeds of any
insurance relating to such damage or destruction received by the
Developer from the City to the payment or reimbursement of the
costs thereof.
(5) The Developer shall complete the repair, reconstruction,
and restoration of the Minimum Improvements, whether or not the Net
Proceeds of insurance received by the Developer for such purposes
are sufficient. After completion of such repairs, construction and
restoration shall be disbursed by the City to the Developer.
Section 5.2. Condemnation. In the event that title to and
possession of the Minimum Improvements or any other material part
thereof shall be taken in condemnation or by the exercise of the
power of eminent domain by any governmental body or other person
(except the City), so long as the Assessment Agreement shall remain
in effect, the Developer shall, with reasonable promptness after
such taking, notify the City as to the nature and extent of such
taking.
Section 5.3. Reconstruction or Payment. Upon receipt of any
Condemnation Award or property insurance proceeds, the Developer
shall use the entire Condemnation Award to reconstruct the Minimum
Improvements (or, in the event only a part of Minimum Improvements
has been taken, then to reconstruct such part) upon the Development
Property or elsewhere within the Tax Increment District; provided,
however, that the Developer may instead elect to pay the City out
of the Condemnation Award or property insurance proceeds, if an to
the extent any such Condemnation Award or property insurance
proceeds are sufficient for such purpose and not in excess of the
limitation of amounts the City may accept under Section 3.2 of this
Agreement, either: (1) the present value of the sum of the real
property taxes which would have been assessed upon the Development
Property and the Minimum Improvements between the date of such
condemnation and the Termination Date, such calculation to be based
upon (A) the Assessor's Minimum Market Value specified in the
Assessment Agreement, and (B) the then - effective tax capacity rate
upon the date of such condemnation, such sum to be discounted to
present value based upon (A) or receipt of said property insurance
proceeds the number of years between the date of such condemnation
and the Termination Date, and (B) the average interest rate on the
Bonds, or (2) a sum sufficient to retire the Bonds immediately,
including any interest due.
ARTICLE VI •
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
Section 6.1. Events of Default Defined. The following shall
be "Events of Default" under this Agreement, and the term "Event of
Default" shall mean whenever it is used in this Agreement any one
or more of the following events:
(1) Failure by the Developer to timely pay all ad valorem
real property taxes assessed with respect to the Development
Property.
(2) Failure by the Developer to cause the construction of the
Project to be completed pursuant to the material terms, conditions,
and limitations of this Agreement.
(3) Failure of the Developer to observe or perform any other
material covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on its part
to be observed or performed under this Agreement.
(4) The holder of any mortgage on the Development Property or
any improvements thereon, or any portion thereof, commences
foreclosure proceedings as a result of any default under the
applicable mortgage documents.
S(5) Failure by the Developer to cause the Minimum
Improvements to be reconstructed when required pursuant to Article
V of this Agreement.
(6) If the Developer shall:
(A) File any petition in bankruptcy or for any
reorganization, arrangement, composition, readjustment,
liquidation, dissolution, or similar relief under the United
States Bankruptcy Act of 178, as amended or under any similar
federal or state law; or
(B) Admit in writing its inability to pay its debts
generally as they become due; or
(C) Be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a
petition or answer proposing the adjudication of the
Developer, as a bankrupt or its reorganization under any
present or future federal bankruptcy act or any similar
federal or state law shall be filed in any court and such
petition or answer shall not be discharged or denied within
sixty (60) days after the filing thereof; or a receiver,
trustee, or liquidator of the Developer, or of the Project, or
part thereof, shall be appointed in any proceeding brought
. against the Developer, and shall not be discharged within
sixty (60) days after such appointment, or if the Developer
shall consent to or acquiesce in such appointment.
(7) If the Tax Increment District should at any time not
constitute a "qualified housing district" under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.1399, subdivision 1(d), or if for any reason the City
shall be subject to the loss of any state aid as a result of the
existence of the Tax Increment District.
Section 6.2. Remedies on Default. Whenever any Event of
Default referred to in Section 6.1 occurs and is continuing, the
City, as specified below, may take any one or more of the following
actions after the giving of thirty (30) days, written notice to the
Developer, but only if the Event of Default has not been cured
within said thirty (30) days or the Developer has failed to
institute actions within said 30 -day period, reasonably calculated
to cure the default within said time period. If it is impossible
to cure the default within the 30 days, the Developer shall have 90
days to cure the default if there is acceptable plan for remedy.
(1) The City may suspend its performance under this Agreement
until it receives assurances from the Developer, deemed adequate by
the City, that the Developer will cure his default and continue its
performance under this Agreement.
(2) The City may cancel and rescind the Agreement.
(3) The City may take any action, including legal or
administrative action, which may appear necessary or desirable to
enforce performance and observance of any obligation, agreement, or
covenant of the Developer under this Agreement. 0
(4) The City may draw upon any guarantee or security provided
to the City pursuant to any of the terms of this Agreement
according to its terms.
Section 6.3. No Remedy Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred
upon or reserved to the City is intended to be exclusive of any
other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy
shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy
given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or
in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any
right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such
right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but
any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as
often as may be deemed expedient.
Section 6.4. No Implied Waiver. In the event any agreement
contained in this Agreement should be breached by any party and
thereafter waived by any other party, such waiver shall be limited
to the particular breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive
any other concurrent, previous, or subsequent breach hereunder. •
Section 6.5. Agreement to Pay Attorney's Fees and Expenses.
Whenever any Event of Default occurs and the City shall employ
attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of payments
due or to become due or for the enforcement or performance or
observance of any obligation or agreement on the part of the
Developer herein contained, the Developer agrees that it shall, on
demand therefor, pay to the City the reasonable fees of such
attorneys and such other expenses so incurred by the City.
C l
0 Section 6.6. Indemnification of City.
(1) The Developer releases from and covenants and agrees that
the City, its governing body members, officers, agents, including
the independent contractors consultants, and legal counsel,
servants, and employees thereof (hereinafter for purposes of this
Section, collectively the "Indemnified Parties ") shall not be
liable for and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
Indemnified Parties against any loss or damage to property or any
injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or resulting
from the Project.
(2) Except for any willful misrepresentation or any willful
or wanton misconduct of the Indemnified Parties, the Developer
agrees to protect and defend the Indemnified Parties, now and
forever, and further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any
claim, demand, suit, action, or other proceeding whatsoever by any
person or entity whatsoever arising or purportedly arising from the
actions or inactions of the Developer (or if other persons acting
on its behalf or under its direction or control) under this
Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby or the
acquisition, construction, installation, ownership, and operation
of the Project; provided, that this indemnification shall not apply
• to the warranties made or obligations undertaken by the City in
this Agreement.
(3) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements, and
obligations of the City contained herein shall be deemed to be the
covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements, and obligations of
the City and not of any governing body member, officer, agent,
servant, or employee of the City.
Section 6.7. Recapture of Delinquent Increment, rees,
Penalties, Interest. In the event that delinquent taxes are
recaptured upon subsequent sale of the development property, The
City shall be deemed eligible to recapture its portion of the
delinquent tax increment, including but not limited to, any fees,
penalties, and interest assessed and accrued thereon.
•
ARTICLE VII
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AND OTHER COVENANTS
Section 7.1. Execution of Assessment Agreement. The
Developer shall agree to, and with the City shall execute, along
with the Development Agreement, and Assessment Agreement pursuant
to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 8, specifying the Assessor's Minimum Market Value for
the Development Property and the Minimum Improvements for
calculation of real property taxes. Specifically, the Developer
shall agree to a market value for the Development Property and the
Minimum Improvements an amount not less than $1,400,000 yearly
until the Termination Date (as hereinafter defined) (such minimum
market value is herein referred to as the "Assessor's Minimum
Market Value "). Nothing in the Assessment Agreement shall limit
the discretion of the assessor to assign a market value to the
property in excess of such Assessor's Minimum Market Value nor
prohibit the Developer from seeking through the exercise of legal
or administrative remedies a reduction in such market value for
property tax purposes, provided however, that the Developer shall
not seek a reduction of such market value below the Assessor's
Minimum Market Value in any year so long as the Assessment
Agreement shall remain in effect. The Assessment Agreement shall
remain in effect until 2017 (the "Termination Date "). The •
Assessment Agreement shall be certified by the Assessor for the
County as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177,
Subdivision 8, upon a finding by the Assessor that the Assessor's
Minimum Market Value represents a reasonable estimate based upon
the plans and specifications for the Minimum Improvements to be
constructed on the Development Property and the
market value previously assigned to the Development Property.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 8,
the Assessment Agreement shall be filed for record in the office of
the county recorder or registrar of titles of McLeod County, and
such filing shall constitute notice to any subsequent encumbrancer
or purchaser of the Development Property (or part thereof), whether
voluntary or involuntary, and such Assessment Agreement shall be
binding and enforceable in its entirety against any such subsequent
purchaser or encumbrancer, including the holder of the First
Mortgage. The City shall notify the Assessor upon completion of
any building in the Project.
Section 7.2. Real Property Taxes. The Developer shall pay
all real property taxes payable with respect to all and any parts
of the Development Property acquired and owned by it and pursuant
to the provisions of the Assessment Agreement and any other
statutory or contractual duty that shall accrue subsequent to the
date of its acquisition of title to the Development Property (or
part thereof) and until the Developers obligations have been
assumed by any other person pursuant to the provisions of this
Agreement or title to the property is vested in another person.
The Developer agrees that prior to the Termination Date:
(a) It will not seek administrative review or judicial
• review of the applicability or constitutionality of any tax
statute relating to the taxation of real property contained on
the Development Property, at or less than the minimum
assessment valuation of $1,400,000, determined by any tax
official to be applicable to the Project or the Developer or
raise the inapplicability or constitutionality of any such tax
statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent
tax proceedings; provided, however, that "tax statute" does
not include any local ordinance or resolution levying a tax;
and
(b) It will not seek any tax deferral or abatement,
either presently or prospectively authorized under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.181, or any other State or federal law,
of the taxation of real property contained in the Development
Property, at or less than the minimum assessment valuation of
$1,400,000, between the date of execution of this Agreement
and the Termination Date.
0
ARTICLE VIII
ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Section 8.1. Restrictions on Use. The Developer agrees for
itself, its successors, and assigns and every successor in interest
to the Development Property, or any part thereof, that the
Developer and such successors and assigns shall devote the
Development Property to, and in accordance with, the uses specified
in this Agreement.
Section 8.2. Conflicts of Interest. No member of the
governing body or other official of the City shall have any
financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the
Development Property or the Project, or any contract, agreement or
other transaction contemplated to occur or be undertaken thereunder
or with respect thereto, nor shall any such member of the governing
body or other official participate in any decision relating to the
Agreement which affects his or her personal interests or the
interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in which
he or she is directly or indirectly interested. No member,
official or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the
City in the event of any default or breach by the Developer or
successor or on any obligations under the terms of this Agreement. •
Section 8.3. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of
the several parts, articles, and sections of the Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded
in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 8.4. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise
expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand or other
communication under this Agreement by any party to any other shall
be sufficiently given or delivered if its is dispatched by
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt
requested, or delivered personally, and
0 ) In the case of the Developer, is addressed to or
delivered personally to:
Augusta Building Corporation
P.O. Box 367
Augusta, WI 54722 -0367
0
• (2) In the case of the City, is addressed to or delivered
personally to the City at:
City of Hutchinson
1111 Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
or at such other address with respect to any such party as that
party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to
the other, as provided in this Section.
11
•
Section 8.5. Counterparts.
any number of counterparts, each
the same instrument.
Section 8.6. Law Governing.
and construed in accordance with
This Agreement may be executed in
of which shall constitute one and
This Agreement will be governed
the laws of the State.
Section 8.7. Sale of Property. Any subsequent re -sale of
development property, or a portion thereof, shall cause developer
to reimburse to the City any TIF proceeds that have been received
on that portion on a pro -rata basis from its Pay -go receipts, or
reduce its collection of Pay-go until this pro -rata obligation has
been satisfied.
This Development Agreement shall be fully transferrable and
enforceable upon the Development Property and subsequent owner(s)
until the Maturity Date, 23 years from the acceptance date of this
Agreement, of the Development District.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to
be duly executed in its name and on its behalf and its seal to be
hereunto duly affixed, and the Developer has caused this Agreement
to be duly executed in his name and on his behalf, on or as of the
date first above written.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ED
M
Its Mayor
Its City Administrator
This is a signature page to the Development Agreement dated as of
19 , by and between the City of
Hutchinson and Augusta Building Corporation.
•
n
0
CJ
•
AUGUSTA BUILDING CORPORATION
By
M
This is a signature page to the
Hutchinson and Augusta
19
Building
Development
_ by and
Corporation.
Agreement dated as of
between the City of
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
): ss
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 19 , by
and , the
Mayor and the City Administrator, respectively, of the City of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the
City.
Notary Public
0
•
0
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
): ss
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _
day of , 19 , by
and the
of Augusta Building Corporation, a Wisconsin
Corporation, on behalf of the Developer.
Notary Public
11
0
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
That Property described as follows:
S6301OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12- 116 -30
0
L
• EXHIBIT B
ESTIMATED REPAYMENT SCHEDULE /INCREMENT SHARING
•
0
ATTACHMENT I
CALCULATION OF INCREMENT
C-1
• ATTACHMENT II
CALCULATION OF ESTIMATED NET PRESENT VALUE
0
ATTACHMENT III
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE
0
• ARTICLE VI
BONDS AND DEVELOPER PAYMENTS
Section 6.1. Issuance of Bonds. The City agrees to exercise
its best efforts to take all steps necessary to issue the Bonds in
an amount sufficient to finance the City's obligations to the
Developer hereunder, including the Land Write Down. The obligation
of the City to issue the Bonds shall be subject to the limitations
provided in Section 6.2 of this Agreement.
Section 6.2. Guaranty of Tax Increment Shortfall. The
parties reasonably expect that the annual Tax Increments to be
derived from the Development Property in any calendar year after
1993 and prior to the Maturity Date will exceed the minimum amount
needed to pay when due all principal and interest maturing in that
year on that portion of the Tax Increment Bonds issued in
connection with the Project. The Developer agrees that if for any
reason such Tax Increments in any calendar year are less than
$44,000, then the Developer shall pay, upon demand by the City, to
the City the difference between the Tax Increment actually derived
and $44,000.
Section 6.3. Developer Payment. The Developer acknowledges
that the development and operation of the Project will require
expenditures to be made by the City from its general funds to
provide certain public services to the project, including police
and fire protection, traffic regulation, and the maintenance of
streets and water, sewer and other utility services.
0
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
•
THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of the day of ,
1994, and is between the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the
City), and Augusta Building Corporation, its successors and /or its
assigns, a Wisconsin Corporation (the Developer);
IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual covenants and benefits herein
described, the City and the Developer recite and agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. Designation of Development District and Adoption of
Development Program. The City has designated a development
district in the City denominated Development District No. 8 (the
Development Program) pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134 (the Act).
1.02. Creation of the District. The City has established
a tax increment financing district designated as Tax Increment
Financing District No. 8 (the District) within the Development
District and authorized the financing of the Development Program
pursuant to a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment
Plan ") pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.174 though 469.179 (the Tax Increment Financing Act).
1.03. Implementation. The City Council of the City has
authorized and directed the officers of the City to take all
actions necessary to implement and carry out the Development
Program, subject only to such approval by the City Council as may
be required by the Act. The Development Program proposes that the
City reimburse the Developer from Tax Increment derived from the
District to the extent the Tax Increment is sufficient for
reimbursement of the Developer's up -front site costs.
1.04. Improvement of Property. The City has determined
that it is necessary, in order to accomplish the purposes specified
in and to carry out the Development Program,l for the Developer to
finance the cost of acquisition and preparation for development of
certain property located in McLeod County, Minnesota, described in
Exhibit A hereto (the Land) and for other costs incurred by them in
the development of the Land.
1.05. Development Agreement. The City and the Developer
have entered into a Development Agreement, dated , 1994
(the Development Agreement), which proves that the Developer will
improve the Land by the construction of a rental housing facility
thereon (the Facilities). The Development Agreement provides that
upon the execution and delivery of the Development Agreement, the
• City and Developer are to enter into this Assessment Agreement.
Section 2. Minimum Market Value.
2.01. Agreed Upon Minimums. The Developer agrees that the •
minimum market value of the Land and the completed Facilities for
ad valorem tax purposes, commencing with the assessment made as of
January 2, 1996, shall be $1,400,00 and shall not be reduced by any
action taken by the Developer (other than a deed in lieu of, or
under threat of, condemnation by the City or other condemning
authority), to less than the said amount of $1,400,00, and that
during said period no reduction of the market value therefor below
said minimum market value shall be sought by the Developer or
granted by any public official or Court except in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 8. This minimum
market value shall apply only to the Land and Facilities situated
on the Land. In event of involuntary conversion of the Land for
any reason, the minimum market value shall not be reduced to an
amount less than $1,400,000.
2.02. Higher Market Value. Nothing in this Assessment
Agreement shall limit the discretion of the County Assessor of
McLeod County, acting as assessor for the City of Hutchinson (the
Assessor) or any other public official or body having the duty to
determine the market value of the Land and the Facilities for ad
valorem tax purposes, to assign to the Land and the Facilities, or
to any other improvements constructed on the Land or on the
premises described in Exhibit A, on a nondiscriminatory basis and
treated fairly and equally with all other property so classified in
McLeod County, a market value in excess of the minimum market value
specified in Section 2.01. The Developer shall have the normal
remedies available under the law to contest any estimated
assessors estimated value in excess of $1,400,000 or as increased
annually, as provided above.
2.03. Substantial Completion. For purposes of this
Assessment Agreement and the determination of the market value of
the Land and the completed Facilities for ad valorem tax purposes,
the Developer agrees that the Facilities shall be deemed to be
completed in accordance with the Development Agreement as of June
30, 1995, whether in fact completed or not.
Section 3. Filing and Certification.
3.01. Assessor Certification. The City shall present this
Assessment Agreement to the Assessor and request him to execute the
certification of the Assessor contained hereon. The Developer
shall provide to the Assessor all information relating to the Land
and the Facilities requested by him for the purposes of discharging
his duties wit respect to the certification.
•
• 3.02. Filing. Prior to the recording of any mortgage,
security agreement or other instrument creating a lien on the Land
and in any event not less than 30 days after the execution of this
Assessment Agreement, the Developer shall cause this Assessment
Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of
McLeod County, or with the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County,
Minnesota, if the title to the Land is registered.
Section 4. Relation to Development Agreement.
The covenants and agreements made by the Developer in this
Assessment Agreement are separate from and in addition to the
covenants and agreements made by the Developer in the Development
Agreement; nothing contained herein shall in any way alter,
diminish, or supersede the duties and obligations of the Developer
under the Development Agreement.
Section 5. Miscellaneous'Provisions.
5.01. Binding Effect. This Assessment Agreement shall
inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the City and the
Developer and their respective successors and assigns, and upon all
subsequent owners of the Land and the Facilities.
5.02. Severability. In the event any provision of this
Assessment Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any
court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate
or render unenforceable any other provision hereof.
5.03. Amendments Changes and Modifications. Except as
provided in Section 5.04, this Assessment Agreement may be amended
or any of its terms modified only by written amendment authorized
and executed by the City and the Developer.
5.04. Further Assurances and Corrective Instruments. The
City and the Developer agree that they will, from time to time,
execute, acknowledge and deliver, or cause to be executed,
acknowledged or delivered, such supplements hereto and such further
instrument as may reasonably be required for correcting any
inadequate or incorrect description of the Land or the Facilities,
or carrying out the expressed intention of this Assessment
Agreement.
5.05. Execution Counterparts. This Assessment Agreement
may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of
which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but
one and the same instrument.
5.06. Applicable Law. This Assessment Agreement shall be
governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
0
5.07. Captions. The captions or headings in this
Assessment Agreement are for convenience only and in no way define, .
limit or describe the scope or intent of any provisions or Sections
of this Assessment Agreement.
5.08. Effective Date. This Assessment Agreement shall be
effective as of 1994.
5.09. Termination Date. This Assessment Agreement shall
terminate upon the termination of the District in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.176, subdivision 1.
9
A
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Assessment
Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by its duly
authorized officers; and the Developer has caused this Assessment
Agreement to be executed in its corporate name by its duly
authorized officer.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
Mayor
Attest
City Administrator
AUGUSTA BUILDING CORPORATION
Lm
0
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1994, by
the Mayor, and , the City Administrator for
the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, on
behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1994, by ,
the of Augusta Building Corporation, a
Wisconsin Corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
ASSESSOR'S CERTIFICATION
The undersigned assessor, being legally responsible for
the assessment of the above - described property, certifies that the
market value assigned to the land and improvements are reasonable.
Prior to making this certification, the undersigned
assessor has undertaken the review required by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.177, subdivision 8.
Dated:
County Assessor
McLeod, Minnesota
A: \BS_Agree
17J
•
•
C�
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dated: 11.22 -1994
I, the owner of real property located at 1020 Hwy 22 South in the City of Hutchinson, MN, hereby
petition that property be improved by construction of watermain, sanitary sewer, services and appurtenances,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
OWNERS SIGNATURE
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
1020 Hwy 22 South
City PID #06- 116- 29 -15- 0180 /County PID #23.205.0140
Lot 14 Lot G Subdivision
B & G Cartage & Warehouse, 1504 Greeley Ave, Glencoe MN 55336
By:
(Please Print)
Its:
•
(Title)
I have caused an examination to be made of the records provided by the County of McLeod, in order to
ascertain the names and addresses of each person, firm or corporation having an interest in each lot, tract or parcel
for which improvement is requested and against which a special assessment will be made for the entire cost of the
improvement. After making search and inquiry, I am unable to find any other persons, firms or corporation who
have interest other than those listed. To my best knowledge, the persons herein named are all the owners of
properties affected by the petitioned improvement.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Gary D. Plotz
Dated: 11 -22 -1994 Title: City Administrator
C�
io-4r3
AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND
WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL
This Agreement, is made this 22nd day of November, 1994, between the City of Hutchinson, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and B & G Cartage & Warehouse of McLeod County, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as Owner.
In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owner's request, to cause the improvement of
1020 Hwy 22 South (City PID # 06- 116 -29 -15 -0180 /County PID # 23.205.0140) by construction of watermain,
sanitary sewer, services and appurtenances, and to assess 100% of the cost of said improvements to the Owner, the
Owner agrees to pay said percentage, as may be determined by the Council of the City to be a fair apportionment
of the costs of said improvement not to exceed $5,000.00, plus accrued interest, over a period ten years. Owner
expressly waives objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that
the amount thereof levied against owner's property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts.
In testimony, whereof, B & G Cartage & Warehouse, has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first
above written.
Owner:
B & G Cartage & Warehouse
By:
• (Please print)
Its:
(Title)
Mayor, Marlin Torgerson
•
In Presence of:
Print Name:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
City Administrator, Gary D. Plotz
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT BY 100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dated: 11-22-1994
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
I, the owner of real property located at 1020 Hwy 7 West in the City of Hutchinson, MN, hereby
petition that property be improved by construction of watermain, sanitary sewer, services and appurtenances,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
OWNERS SIGNATURE
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
1020 Hwy 7 West
City PID #36- 117 -30 -15 -0020 /County PID #23.036.4200
2.8 Acres in SW 1/4 SE 1/4 Section 36-117 -30
Steve Wadsworth
• I have caused an examination to be made of the records provided by the County of McLeod, in order to
ascertain the names and addresses of each person, firm or corporation having an interest in each lot, tract or parcel
for which improvement is requested and against which a special assessment will be made for the entire cost of the
improvement. After making search and inquiry, I am unable to find any other persons, firms or corporation who
have interest other than those listed. To my best knowledge, the persons herein named are all the owners of
properties affected by the petitioned improvement.
Dated: 11 -22 -1994
40
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Gary D. Plotz
Title: City Administrator
. AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT AND
WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL
This Agreement, is made this 22nd day of November, 1994, between the City of Hutchinson, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and Steve Wadsworth of McLeod County, State of Minnesota,
hereinafter referred to as Owner.
In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owner's request, to cause the improvement of
1020 Hwy 7 West (City PID k 36- 117 -30 -15 -0020 /County PID N 23.036.4200) by construction of watermain,
sanitary sewer, services and appurtenances, and to assess 100% of the cost of said improvements to the Owner, the
Owner agrees to pay said percentage, as may be determined by the Council of the City to be a fair apportionment
of the costs of said improvement not to exceed $5,000.00, plus accrued interest, over a period ten years. Owner
expressly waives objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that
the amount thereof levied against owner's property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts.
In testimony, whereof, Steve Wadsworth, has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first above written.
Owner:
In Presence of:
Steve Wadsworth Print Name:
1J
Mayor, Marlin Torgerson
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
City Administrator, Gary D. Plotz
• RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 299
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of 1020 Hwy 7 West and 1020 Hwy 22 South
by sanitary sewer, watermain, services and appurtenances, and the value of such improvement is $10,000.00 and the
expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $0.00, so that the total cost of
the improvement will be $10,000.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00 and
the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $10,000.00.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first
of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1995, and shall bear interest at the rate
of 5.54 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the
proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land
within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such
proposed assessment in his office for public inspection.
• 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council
thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
City Administrator
•
Mayor
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
COMPILED BY J. RODEBERG
COMPUTED B J. RODEBERG
CHECKED BY: J. RODEBERG
ADOPTED: 11 -22 -1994
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 299
1020 HWY 7 WEST & 1020 HWY 7 EAST
SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN AND SERVICES & APPURTENANCES
PAGE 1 OF 1
INTEREST RATE: 5.54%
WATERMAIN CONNECTION: $2,500.00
SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIO $2,500.00
NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: TEN
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
CITY PID NUMBER
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
LOT
NO.
BLOCK
NO.
WATERMAIN
CONNECTIO
SANTTRY SEWER
CONNECTION
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NUMBER
01
06116 -29 -15 -0180
B & G CARTAGE & WAREHOUSE
1504 GREELEY AVENUE
1020 HWY 22 SOUTH)
21205.0140
GLENCOE MN 55336
LOT G SUBDIVISION
14
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
$5,000.00
02
36117 -30- 15-0020
STEVE WADSWORTH
1020 HWY 15 SOUTH
1020 HWY&SOUT
23.036.4200
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
2.8 ACRES IN SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SECTION 36117 -30
$2,500.00
$2,50100
$5,000.00
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST
$10,000.00
TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL 299
$10,000.00
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 299
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 22nd day of November, 1994, the Director of
Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving 1020 Hwy 7 West and 1020 Hwy
22 South by sanitary sewer, watermain, services and appurtenances.
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been
completed and filed in his office for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The hearing on such proposed assessments has been waived by 100% of the affected property owners.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the
County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment,
to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 30,
1994. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining
unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of November, 1994.
C
City Administrator
E
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 299
WHEREAS, pursuant to receipt of petition and waiver of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the
proposed assessment for the improvement of 1020 Hwy 7 West and 1020 Hwy 22 South by sanitary sewer,
watermain, services and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby
accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land
therein included is hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment
levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10)
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1995, and shall bear
interest at the rate of 5.54 percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the
first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from December 1, 1994, until the 31st day of
December, 1995. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to
the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
• payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the
30th day of November, 1994; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount
of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such
payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through
December 31, of the next succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County
Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid
over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 22nd day of Novvember, 1994.
City Administrator
E
Mayor
November 23, 1994
Mr. Thomas D. Creighton
Bernick & Lifson
Suite 1200
The Collonade
5500 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, Mn. 55416
Re: Hutchinson Cable TV Services
Our File No. 3244 -92054
• Dear Tom:
Enclosed for your review is a Resolution extending the expiration
date on the Franchise Agreement with D.D. Cable Partners, L.P.,
d /b /a Midwest Cable Vision to January 15, 1995.
Please review the same and get back to me with any comments.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
•
le --A (4)
11
•
RESOLUTION NO. 10350
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE EXPIRATION DATE OF
THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF
A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson ( "City ") has an Agreement, as
amended, with D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. d /b /a Midwest Cable Vision,
as successor to Star North American Corporation ( "Company ") for the
construction and operation of a cable communications system within
the City ( "Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement as extended will expire by its terms on
or about December 1, 1994, unless City and Company mutually agree
to extend the term of the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City and the
franchise renewal proceeding,
December 1, 1994; and
Company are involved in a cable
which may not be concluded by
WHEREAS, the Company and the City agree to an extension of the
expiration date of the Agreement until January 15, 1995.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson as follows:
1. The term of the Agreement granting Company permission to
construct and operate a cable communications system in the City is
hereby amended to expire on January 15, 1995 unless City and
Company have executed and adopted a new Cable Communications
Franchise Ordinance prior to December 1, 1994, in which case the
Agreement shall expire and terminate concurrently with the
effective date of said Franchise Ordinance.
2. Except as modified by paragraph 1 above, all other terms,
conditions, provisions and requirements of the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect. Neither party waives any rights
it may have pursuant to the Agreement, State or Federal law.
3. The Company, if it accepts this Resolution and the rights
and obligations hereby granted, shall file with the City its
written acceptance of this Resolution, on or before December 1,
1994.
4. This Resolution shall be effective upon its passage.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1994.
0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By:
Its Mayor
(µ�
ACCEPTANCE BY COMPANY
This Resolution is accepted, and we agree to be bound by all
its terms and conditions.
Dated:
U
D.D. CABLE PARTNERS, L.P.
By:
Its:
r�
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:50:33
Page 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1� 979 IMPRO.BDS
1992 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION DUE TO 1992 IMPROV CON $350,000.00
$350,000.00
1980 TIDS
1979 IMPROVEMENT BONDS DUE TO 1979 IMPROV BDS $40,000.00
1985 TAX INC.DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER $24,320.00
1990 TAX INC. DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER $159,838.00
$224,158.00
1982 TIDS
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE DUE TO 1980 TI CONSTR $20,071.25
$20,071.25
1984 PARKING BDS
1981 PARKING CONSTRUCTION DUE TO 1981 PRKG CONST $400.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON DUE TO WATER /SEWER $405,000.00
$405,400.00
1985 TIDS
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE DUE TO 1980 TIDS $8,000.00
1990 TAX INC CONSTRUCTION DUE TO 1990 TI CONSTR $81,973.42
•
$89,973.42
1990 IMPRO.BDS
1991 IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION DUE TO 1991 IMPROV CON $227.50
$227.50
1990 TICB
1980
TAX INC DEBT SERVICE
DUE
TO
1980 TIDC
$64,768.75
DUE TO 1979 IMPROV BDS
$905.17
1992
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
DUE TO 1992 IMPROV DS
$64,768.75
1990
TIDS
DUE TO WATER /SEWER
$202,649.84
•CITY
1979
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
DUE
TO
1979 IMPROV BND
$10,000.00
1980
TAX INC DEBT SERVICE
DUE
TO
1980 TIDS
$31,125.79
1990
TAX INC CONSTRUCTION
DUE
TO
1990 TI CONSTR
$284.19
AM.NATIONAL BANK
MTCE CHARGES
$335.00
$41,744.98
1992
IMPRO.BDS
1979
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
DUE TO 1979 IMPROV BDS
$905.17
1992
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
DUE TO 1992 IMPROV DS
$1,228.00
OF HUTCHINSON
DUE TO WATER /SEWER
$202,649.84
•CITY
$204,783.01
//-A
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:50:33
Page 2
1992 TICB
1992 REFUNDING IMPROV BONDS DUE TO 1992 REFUNDING $8,366.88
CITY OF HUTCHINSON DUE TO WATER /SEWER $283,929.59
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN DUE TO GENERAL FUND $16,958.79
$309,255.26
1992 TIDS
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE DUE TO 1980 TIDS $18,813.75
1992 TAX INC. DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER $37,628.00
$56,441.75
1993 IMPRO.CON B
CITY OF HUTCHINSON DUE TO 1993 IMPROV BDS $400,000.00
$400,000.00
1994 IMPRO CONST
COMSTOCK DAVIS INC PROF SERVICES $900.00
MN PLANNING DNR DATABASE HERITAGE $55.00
OSM PROF SERVICES $15,252.77
RUST ENVIRONMENT PROF SERVICES $9,033.14
$25,240.91
X1994 T I CONST.
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL LAND TRUST SERVICES $3,261.99
$3,261.99
AIRPORT RENOVAT.
1990 IMPROVEMENT BONDS
DUE
TO 1990 IMPROV BND
$179,000.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
DUE
TO CAPITAL IMPROV
$4,390.42
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
DUE
TO WATER /SEWER
$109,945.88
MATHIOWETZ CONSTRUCTION
EST
#13
$183,218.17
TKDA
PROF
SERVICES -PHASE II
$12,605.28
$489,159.75
CAP.IMPRO.FUND
1985 IMPROV DEBT SERVICE DUE TO 1992 IMPROV DS $1,277.75
$1,277.75
ALLEN OFFICE PROD
ERASERS, NOTES
$5.06
BRANDON TIRE CO
TIRE REPAIR
$291.54
CENTURY LABS
SCRUBS
$51.89
H &L MESABI
5/8x8x144
$173.91
HUTCH COOP CENEX
TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE
TIRES
ALIGNMENT
$257.39
$32.95
TWO WAY COMM INC
6 ANTENNA
$31.95
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:50:33
Page 3
WIGEN CHEVROLET CO
•
REPAIR
$215.45
$1,060.14
ENERGY LOAN FD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BLDG PERMIT #12160
$71.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN
DUE TO GENERAL FUND
$34,253.85
INGLEMAN &, JULIE
#7 FOOTINGS
$22,160.84
WESTLUND &, PEARL
TRASH REMOVAL
$959.02
$57,444.71
GENERAL FUND
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE
DUE TO 1980 TIDS
$48,936.67
AAGARD WEST
NOV OFFICE PAPER PICKU
$563.00
AIRPORT RENOVATION
DUE TO AIRPORT RENOVAT
$16,949.44
ALLEN OFFICE PROD
ADDRESS STAMP, PENS
$21.04
ALLEN, JEAN
SR. TOUR REFUND
$25.00
AM RISK SERVICES
NOV SERVICE
$800.00
ANDERSON'S DECORATING CENTER
PAINT
$30.92
ARNDT, BILL
ELECTION JUDGE
$67.50
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
FIRE DEPT JUDGEMENTS
$1,447.31
AUTOMATION SUPPLY CO
CARTRIDGE
$36.96
BENNETT OFFICE SUP.
SERVICE CONTRACT
$123.44
BIG BEAR
POSTS
$25.20
BREMIX CONCRETE CO
CONCRETE
$132.40
•BROWNS FLORAL
PLANT -KRAFT
$21.30
BRUNNER, DOLORES
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
BUTLER, MATT
FOOTBALL COACH
$72.00
CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY
PLOT T BOND
$30.04
CAMERA SHOP
PHOTOS
$10.78
CARNEYS
HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES
$23.92
CELLULAR 2000
OCT CELLULAR
$147.57
CENTRAL GARAGE
DUE TO CENTRAL GARAGE
$3,939.24
CENTURY LABS
SCRUBS
$246.11
COUNTY TREASURER
PARCEL PRINTOUT
$24,302.10
CROSS, KARLA
ELECTION JUDGE
$78.75
CROW RIVER PRESS INC
1000 NEWSLETTERS
$280.87
CULLIGAN WATER COND
3 BAGS SALT
$12.32.
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
WHEEL ASSY
$50.18
DAGGETT, DORIS
ELECTION JUDGE
$80.00
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR REG FEES
$477.00
FARM & HOME DIST. CO
GALV NIPPLE, ETC
$24.40
FESTIVAL FOODS
KLEENEX, CLEANERS
$120.76
FIECKE, JOHN
4 HOURS WORK
$20.00
FREEMAN, CAROL
JR.PREC SKATING REFUND
$55.00
GORHAM, SHEILA
INSTRUCTOR FEE
$20.00
GRUENHAGEN, HELEN
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
H.W.B.A.
2 POINTSETTIAS
$16.00
HAGEN, RUTH
ELECTION JUDGE
$80.00
HAGER JEWELRY
NAMEPLATES
$75.17
HAMMOND- JOHNSON, MICHELLE
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
$51.04
• HANSON, HELEN
SR. CLASS REFUND
$2.50
HAUGEN, MARV
NRPA CONGRESS EXPENSES
$194.29
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:50:33
Page 4
•
HCVN -TV
HENSEN, MARK
CABLE FRANCHISE
DUES MEETING FEE
$750.00
$16.59
HOGAN, SHARAE
POWER SKATING REFUND
$4.00
HUTCH COOP CENEX
OCT FUEL
$3,810.02
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
3 INSPECTIONS
$15.00
HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER
EXAM- D.POWELL,B.RUNKE
$289.00
HUTCH PUBLIC SCHOOLS
TRACK & FIELD RENT
$56.25
HUTCHINSON JAYCEES
FLAG FOOTBALL REFEREES
$440.00
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
GAS & ELEC
$19,625.82
INK SPOTS
FORMS
$134.33
INSELMANN, LIDA
2 SR. ACTIVITY REFUNDS
$9.00
JENSEN, ROXANNE
ELECTION JUDGE
$80.00
KEMPFERT DESIGN
RWS SIGN
$995.78
KERR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
DRUG TEST
$42.00
KNIGGE, DARLEEN
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
KOEHLER, ANNETTE
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
KOTTKE, GRACE
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
KREIE, IRMA
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
KRUEGER, MARLYN
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
LARSON, IVAN & MARY
2 SR. ACTIVITY REFUNDS
$9.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
W.COMP DEDUCTIBLE
$355.25
LOGIS
OCT CHARGES
$6,629.60
LUNDAHLS
16 GUESTS
$92.00
MARCO BUS.PRODUCTS
TYPEWRITER REPAIR
$119.44
MARKA, JAMES
LUNCH
$15.25
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
COFFEE
$85.35
•MCLAIN,
DEETTA
ELECTION JUDGE
$70.00
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
REF VESTS
$630.74
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
HOT MIX
$896.72
MILLER, SEDONA
ELECTION JUDGE
$87.50
MN MUNICIPAL BOARD
ANNEXATION 8.5 ACRES
$100.00
MOE, RENITA
SKATING REFUND
$24.00
MOON, DOLF
MEETING LUNCHES
$15.28
MORAN, PETE
FOOTBALL COACH
$96.00
MR. MOVIES
GRAND CANYON
$1.40
NATL FIRE PROTECTION ASSC
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$366.75
NEUBARTH, MARGE
SR. TOUR REFUND
$10.00
OLSONS LOCKSMITH
MOUNT DEADBOLT
$44.59
PETERSON BUS SERVICE
BUS TRIP OLD LOG
$202.75
PITNEY BOWES INC
EQUIP MTCE SCALE
$179.00
PLOTZ, GARY D.
MILEAGE, MEETINGS
$60.05
PROCHNOW, EVELYN
ELECTION JUDGE
$80.00
QUADE ELECTRIC
FARIBO LAMP
$497.84
QUALITY WASH
AUTO WASH
$10.00
QUANTUM LABS
BLUE LABEL
$68.53
QUILL CORP
COPY HOLDER
$61.90
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
ICE BLADE GRIND
$82.00
RANNOW, ARDYCE
SR. TOUR REFUNDS
$50.00
REINERT &, FLORENCE
BLDG PERMITS
$35.00
RICKEMAN SEED CENTER
13 PUMPKINS
$6.75
RIDER BENNETT EGAN & ARUNDEL
SEXUAL HARASSMENT TRG
$800.00
SCHLUETER, JOSH
FOOTBALL COACH
$96.00
•
SCHMIDT, HARRIET
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
SCHONS, ALICE
SR. ACTIVITY REFUND
$4.50
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
Tue Nev 22 1994 15:50:33
Page 5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEARL
ELECTION JUDGE
$72.50
•SEALE,
SELECT CARE
ADMIN FEES
$235.50
SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY
33# LAUNDRY
$27.25
SHAW, KAREN
INSTRUCTION
$112.50
SHIMANSKI, VINCE
FOOTBALL COACH
$96.00
SHOPKO
FILM, PAPER
$28.24
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
SUPPLIES
$1.16
SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY
AUGER TEETH
$42.60
STANDARD PRINTING
PENS
$7.46
STAR TRIBUNE
RENEWAL
$21.45
TEPLY, TODD
DJ SHOW 11 -19 -94
$200.00
TEWS, CLARA
ELECTION JUDGE
$73.75
THRAN, ESTHER
SR. ACTIVITY REFUND
$4.50
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
QUART ALAMO
$276.25
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
CONCRETE MIX
$52.50
US POSTAL SERVICE
SR. NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
$235.00
VANHALE, EVELYN
ELECTION JUDGE
$72.50
VOGT, RUTH
SR. TOUR REFUND
$7.00
WAL -MART
GARLAND, TREES - EMPLOYE
$242.16
WEDIN, CHUCK
NRPA CONGRESS EXPENSES
$77.40
WESELOH, PHYLLIS
ELECTION JUDGE
$72.50
WIXCEY, HARRIET
ELECTION JUDGE
$72.50
XEROX CORP
5052 USE OCTOBER
$448.42
YOUNG, ELSA
ELECTION JUDGE
$70.00
ZEE MEDICAL SERV
UNASPIRIN, BANDAIDS, E
$27.29
$140,907.63
•
HAT -FAC. CONST.
Ll
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & AS
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
HOSPITAL BONDS
AM.NATIONAL BANK
INSURANCE FUNDS
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
LIABILITY
PAYING AGENT FEES
MCLEOD CTY PUBLIC HEALTH NURSI BLOOD PRESSURE CLINIC
REC /POOL DS
1976 IMPROVEMENT BONDS
RURAL F. D.
HUTCH COOP CENEX
WATER /SEWER FUND
DUE TO 1976 IMPROV BDS
OCT FUEL
$28,544.92
$687.00
$29,231.92
$177.00
$177.00
$42.00
$42.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$87.94
$87.94
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:50:33
1990 TAX INC CONSTRUCTION
AAGARD WEST
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
BENNETT OFFICE SUP.
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
CELLULAR 2000
CENTRAL GARAGE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN
EBERT, RICHARD
FARM & HOME DIST. CO
FEED RITE CONTROLS
FESTIVAL FOODS
FITZLOFF HARDWARE
HUTCH COMM HOSPITAL
HUTCH COOP CENEX
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
L & P SUPPLY CO
LOGIS
MN VALLEY TESTING LAB
MPCA
MUN LIQUOR STORE
OLSEN, DIANE
PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP
PLUMBING & HTG DOCTOR
RCM ASSOCIATES
RUST ENVIRONMENT
SANIFILL INC
WATERPRO
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
YOUTH CENTER
DUE TO 1990 TI CONSTR
NOV PICKUP
JUNKER LITIGATION
FILES, STAMP
SONY DG90MA-A
OCT CELLULAR
DUE TO CENTRAL GARAGE
DUE TO GENERAL FUND
WINTER SAFETY BOOTS
4 MULCH BLADE REFUNDS
ACID HYDROFLUOSILICIC
SUPPLIES
1 MULCH BLADE REFUND
S.HANSON -SHOT
OCT FUEL
ELEC
4 MULCH BLADE REFUNDS
OCT CHARGES
TESTING
REG- D.JOHNSON
DUE TO LIQUOR FUND
LOGIS TRAINING
MAILING MACHINE
TEST RPZ
PROF SERV -ELEV STORAGE
PROF SERVICES
LOADS OCT 24 -28
GAUGE
OCT ADVERTISING
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN DUE TO GENERAL FUND
WIRE TRANSFERS
PAYROLL FUND
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
1992TAX INCREMENT
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION
Page 6
$14,291.37
$269.29
$153.40
$93.42
$31.60
$36.71
$365.84
$35,040.52
$30.00
$84.31
$774.17
$10.62
$15.00
$122.00
$1,551.38
$15,389.40
$20.00
$1,013.24
$10.00
$215.00
$275,000.00
$174.38
$965.76
$40.00
$698.93
$4,736.94
$4,091.75
$259.01
$120.00
$355,604.04
$4,392.72
$4,392.72
$3,279,712.42
5,430.84
DEPOSITORY TRUST INTEREST 18,813.75
IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT Tue Nov 22 1994 15:48:50
Page 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1987 IMPROV. BDS
AM.NATIONAL BANK
AIRPORT RENOVAT.
MCLEOD COOP POWER
GENERAL FUND
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DULUTH TECHNICAL COLLEGE
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
MCLEOD COOP POWER
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
US WEST COMMUN
WILSONS NORTH WEST NURSERY INC
LIQUOR STORE
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
LOCHER BROS INC
SPRENGLER TRUCKING
PAYROLL FUND
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS.
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
H.R.L.A.P.R.
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
PERA LIFE INS CO.
PERA - D.C.P.
PRUDENTIAL
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
TEMPLETON INC
WADELL & REED
WITHHOLDING TAX ACCT
WATER /SEWER FUND
AM.NATIONAL BANK
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
STATE TREASURER
INTEREST
ELECTRICITY
DNR TITLE FEES
4 REGISTRATIONS -MNDOT
PHONE SERV
ELECTRICITY
SALES TAX
NOV SERVICE
TREES
MIX DRINKS
oct freight
CO. EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYER
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYER
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYEE
EMPLOYER
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
CONTRIB 11 -5
INTEREST
PHONE SERV
OCT SALES TAX
D.SMOGER EXAM FEE
$18,475.00
$18,475.00
$130.39
$130.39
$836.00
$200.00
$5,341.91
$317.80
$33.97
$207.21
$588.95
$7,525.84
$49.40
$82.80
$1,140.65
$1,272.85
$655.00
$100.00
$187.85
$1,747.46
$136.50
$52.02
$140.00
$318.46
$12,671.61
$438.85
$150.00
$27,316.06
$43,913.81
$156,400.00
$510.41
$3,941.03
$15.00
$160,866.44
$232,184.33
HAND WRITTEN CHECKS NOVEMBER 22, 1994
IQUOR FUND
AMERICAN LINEN
MISC PUR
120.61
CITY OF HUT
PAY TR
5,312.52
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LOTTERY SALES
1,800.00
COAST TO COAST
BEER PUR
3.38
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
CHG CARD
20.00
FESTIVAL
OFFICE SUPP
32.80
GRIGGS COOPER
WINE & LIQ
3,805.36
GRIGGS COOPER
WINE /LIQ PURCH
2,800.03
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQMINE PUR
8,180.17
KDUZ
ADV
39.00
LENNEMAN BEV
BEER
3,216.20
LOCHER BORS
BEER PUR
9,995.95
MEDICAL &LIAB INS
JAN -OCT
20,795.35
MNJAYCEES
ADV
52.50
PHILLIPS
WINE & LIQ
6,820.29
QUALITY WINE
BEER PUR
3,655.15
SPRENGLER
FREIGHT
1,140.65
TOTAL REGISTER
NEW REGISTER
12,494.82
TRIPLE G
BEER PUR
15,256.55
VIKING COCA COLA
MISC PUR
207.85
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
PRINTING
97.81
XEROX
YR CONT
325.00
TOTAL
96,171.99
PERMANENT TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR FUND TO GEN FUND $65,000.00
0
E
1]
Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
P.O. Box 624
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Dear Gary,
NOW 6 1994
November 07, 1994
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
/`A� A P
The time is here already when the Jaycee's start planning the 53rd Annual Jaycee
Water Carnival to be held next June. The Jaycee's appreciate the time and energy
that the City and its staff put toward this annual event, without your help it simply
would not happen.
Every year we look to the entire business community for support of this celebration.
The Jaycee's may organize the Water Carnival, but it is the community of Hutchinson
that is the real backbone of support for this event. In the past, the City of Hutchinson
has been very supportive not only in time and effort, but also in monetary support.
We realize that there are always continuous budget constraints, but we ask you
consider a donation of $1,500.00 as the City of Hutchinson's commitment to this year's
community celebration.
Thank you very much for your continued support of the Hutchinson Jaycee Water
Carnival.
Sincerely,
Corey T. Stearns, Commodore
Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
P.O. Box 50
Hutchinson, MN 55350
612 / 587 -2137
0
•
I]
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
October 23, 1994
To: Jim Marka,
It is our understanding that all operations of the scrapyard must be
conducted within an area enclosed by solid wall or fence of 100 percent opacity,
at least 8 feet in height. Mr. Freedland & Eggerts agreed on solid wood fence
10 feet in height.
All landscaped areas shall be kept clean, neat and uncluttered. This means
no weeds. How come the city and county have a different set of rules for weed
control? We have to keep our ditches mowed or we get charged to have them cut.
We were also under the impression that the north and northwest berms would
have two different tree types planted. Also the tree plantings on the four foot
berms should be done as soon as the berm was finished. It is our understanding
that the berm is finished.
So far the fence is not solid and the berm area on either side of the fence
is not finished either. Was this not to be finished prior to the scrapyard opening?
i
G�
(V/ 41r lJo I
Memo
To: Jim Marka •
Re: Mediation with Freedland, Fischers, and Eggerts
It is my understanding that after last night, May 17, 1994, the above named families have agreed to the
following terms and conditions relating to fencing and/or berm with trees.
The berm starting in the northwest corner continuing east along the northborder of the property to the
point at which the wetland begins will be six feet high with 2'- Y trees. A four foot berm will then
continue south following the west edge of the existing ditch all the way to the railroad right away. The
four foot berm will contain 3'- 4' trees.
Mr. Fredland will construct the entire six foot berm within one month after approval of the Conditional -
Use Permit. The four foot berm will be constructed south until dirt is no longer available in 1994. Trees/
on all constructed berms will be planted as soon as possible with the advise of the City Forster.
If any portion of the four foot berm is not finished the project will be completed by August, 1995.
All parties find it advisable to plant seedlings on the remaining portion of the north property line and
the east property line. Most of this area is wetland so a berm is not possible. The timeline for this project
is subject to the availability of seedlings and money, however, it seems appropriate that planting take •
place no later than fall, 1995.
The location of the entrance is still part of the debate. It is my recommendation that the entrance remain
the same as specified on the latest site plan (close to the northeast corner of the property). If the en-
trance is further east, as one neighbor requested, it will just create more road dust for the neighbors. The
heaviest traffic will very likely come from the west. It seems logical the distance to the main entrance is
in direct proportion to the effeciency of the road traffic.
RespectfA submitted,
rck Lennes
•
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Brad Emans, Fire Chief
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCH INSON. MINNESOTA 55350
MONTHLY CITY COUNCIL UPDATE
October, 1994
The Fire Department responded by 22 calls in October and 248 calls to date.
October was once again a tragic month on the roads in our fire district. on October 1, we had a two
vehicle head -on with one fatality on Highway 7 East and then on October 27 we were called to a 2
vehicle head -on with another fatality on Hwy 22 South by Biscay.
A few other calls were:
♦ Bam fire on October 25, a complete loss, cause electrical
♦ House fire on October 25, minor damage, cause furnace motor
♦ Gas explosion at Hutchinson Utilities, building was a total loss
Drills for October:
October 3 Pumping of trucks
October 10 Personal safety seminar put on by Ron Kirchoff of the Police Department. The
presentation was excellent.
October 17 Search and Rescue
October 24 We hosted 24 departments in a regional meeting.
Extra Duty:
Casey Stotts along with some of the firefighters did an outstanding job in Fire Prevention. The
firefighters began on October 10 and presented some form of fire prevention each day until October
19. I am very proud of the job these people do for our residents.
•
E
11
optior
A publication of McLeod Landfill Inc.
Your TrAXsh bill i
ccusations and finger- pointing ran rampant dur-
ing the political season as all the candidates
pounded the podium about taxes and spending.
While we at McLeod Landfill have no intention to re-
play that political theater, we do want to inform you
of one simple fact: Your trash bill is going up, due to
increased fees and taxes. In spite of a $3 million tax
November 1994
s going UP again!
reserve, Mcleod County is considering raising the 22
percent sales tax you or your hauler pay.
hat follows are tables and information about
the state of affairs of your trash disposal costs.
Please contact either McLeod Landfill or your
elected officials if you have any comments regarding
the information in this newsletter.
qA- Current landfill sales tax Type of tax
$6.66 per ton Solid Waste Abatement Fee A
(Formerly the Greater Minnesota Landfill Cleanup Fee)
$1.00 per ton McLeod County Tip Fee A
22eA $7.66 per ton Tax paid directly to and controlled by McLeod County
6.5% 6.5 percent State sales tax (Formerly called the state SCORE tax) B
-4% -- 1.20 per ton - Minnesota Solid Waste Assessment B _ --
2 percent is added to your trash l to pay state and county faxeS v
NOW READ THE NEW COUNTY- PROPOSED TAX INCREASEI
20A $0.60 per ton To be assessed Jan. 1, 1995
3% $1.00 per ton To be assessed June 1, 1995 C
37 percent will be added to your trash bill to pay state and county taxes
BUT THE STATE IS ADDING YET ANOTHER TAXI
15% $4.80 per ton To be assessed Jan. 1, 1995
(This is a new state increase from $1.20 per ton of the
Minnesota Sold waste Assessment)
52 PERCENT WILL BE ADDED TO YOUR TRASH BILL TO PAY
CURRENT AND PROPOSED COUNTY AND STATE TAXES '
A
State law allows the counties to own 100%
a,.. .. I ;hey r :ve from the
Se,._ -_,ce abatement Fee Tax and the
McLeod County Tip Fee Tax 'only for
landfill abatement purposes or costs of clo-
sure, post�closune pre and response
anions or for purposes of mitigating and
compensating for the local risks, costs, and
other adverse effects of facilities'
B
The 65% state sales tax and $120 per ton
Minnesota Solid Waste Assessment fee,
which will increase to $6 per ton Jan. 1,
1995, applies either to the hauling charge
or to the landfill charge. (Commensal
haulers have their customers pay on the
entire bill. Self - haulers pay on the the land-
fill charge.)
McLeod County is not legally responsible for closure, pest - closure care and
response actions at McLeod Landfill, Inc. This is the responsibility of
McLeod Landfill, Inc. and its parent companySanifiN, Inc.
C
The $1 per ton county tax effective June 1,
1995, would apply to outaf<ounty
haulers, which represents about 70% of
Mcleod Landfill customers. Due to the in-
ability of of these longer distance baulers
to absorb this tax increase, Mcleod land-
fill would be forced to reduce the disposal
charge to these longer distance haulers and
increase the disposal charge to shorter dis-
tance (McLeod County) haulers. Thus, the
tax increase would be paid by all cus-
tomers.
So what's the deal with all these
taxes on your waste disposal bill?
1V1cLeod County has historical -
ly spent between $300,000
and $500,000 per year on m-
cycling programs. The county
generally receives about $100,000
per year from the state, and that
balance can be paid by the Solid
Waste Abatement Fee and the
McLeod County Tip Fee.
In 1994, McLeod Landfill cus-
tomers will generate more than $1
million in revenue for McLeod
County. With the recycling pro-
grams costing the county between
$200,000 and $400,000 per year,
this leaves an excess of more than
$500,000 in 1994 alone. As of Octo-
ber,1994, McLeod County had a
cumulative total of more than S3
million above and beyond the cost
of operating their recycling pro-
grams.
On Oct. 10, 1994, the McLeod
County Solid Waste Advisory
Committee Finance Subcommittee
comprised of.
• Highway Engineer Rick Kjonaas
• Auditor Ed Ide
• Zoning Administrator Ed Homan
• Public Health Nurse Becky Felling
• County Environmentalist Todd
Udvig, and
• County Commissioner Eloi Hamm
unanimously recommended to in-
crease county taxes at the landfill.
That Subcommittee recommended
the following tax increases:
• A $0.60 per ton increase of
the Mcleod County Tip Fee
effective Jan. 1,1995;
• A $1 per ton increase
effective June - 1,1995, also
for the McLeod County
Tip Fee. (See "C" on front
page.)
The Subcommittee gave the fol-
lowing reasons for the increase:
• The county wants to
generate as much revenue
as possible from the landfill;
• The Subcommittee believes
that the former county board
used the wrong calculations
from prior yardages rates of
$0.50 per yard or $1 per ton.
They now believe that rate
should have been $0.50 per
yard or $1.60 per ton.
The Subcommittee also introduced
the "Future Phantom Facility." Ac-
cording to their logic, McLeod
Landfill will be filled to capacity
someday and the county will need
a new waste facility Therefore, the
prudent choice was to increase
taxes now in anticipation of that
new facility. But no ideas were
presented on what the new facility
could be, such as a compost plant,
incinerator or another landfill.
In addition, the subcommittee
didn't:
• Assemble a cost estimates
for the new facility;
• Present any figures on what
the current tax rate will
produce over the lifetime of
the current site;
• Present information on the
life of the current site;
• Estimate the current excess
in county coffers from
landfill- generated revenues;
• Present a cohesive,
logical rationale for the
$1 per ton charge to be
assessed beginning
June 1, 1995 (See "C' on front
page.); and
• Present historical /cost data
for recycling programs.
ogic dictates that the issues list-
ed above should be resolved
before taxes are increased.
Please call your county commis-
sioners and urge them to vote
against more taxes!
The McLeod County Board of
Commissioners are:
• Bev Wangerin 587 -6869
• Eloi Hamre
864 -6359
• Don Utrich
587 -4404
• Ray Bayed
485 -2181
• AI Huff
864 -3507
Landfill Myths
Myth Number One:
What is the real life of McLeod Landfill?
McLeod Landfill was permitted in 1970 to dispose of
15 million cubic yards of solid waste. In late 1993,
with only 20 million cubic yards filled, the landfill re-
ceived a permit to construct a lined, state -of- the-art
disposal area to contain 6.2 million cubic yards.
Twelve months later, in October, 1994, at least 21
years of life remained. If further areas are permitted,
the landfill life will be about 40 years. Again, at the
1994 rate, more than 20 years of life remain.
Mirth Number Two:
But isn't the amount of waste disposed
of at the landfill constantly increasing?
The answer depends on the window of time you look
through.
Year
Cubic gate yard estimate
1994
420,000
1993
195,720
1992
123,080
1991
382,619
1990
412,754
1989
252,783
11
i
0
z
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
OCTOBER
5
5 0
OCTOBER
TOTAL
1993 LIQUOR
_____ __________
BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1
____
2,639
---------------------------------------
4,e1R3
813
293
8,428
8,951
2
2,583
4,116
707
428
7,734
8,951
3
1,210
1,459
322
103
16,162
4
985
1,502
223
123
2,833
3,843
5
999
1,409
208
96
2,712
3,835
6
1,250
1,967
391
129
3,737
5,491
7
1,450
1,872
356
161
3,839
8,920
8
2,922
3,592
800
240
7,554
8,219
9
2,405
3,716
825
273
7,219
33,402
10
1,321
2,386
289
235
27,894
11
1,145
1,425
238
157
2,965
2,819
12
1,129
1,526
199
104
2,958
3,652
13
1,102
1,344
279
81
2,806
4,430
14
1,171
2,031
318
138
3,658
8,473
15
2,674
4,344
708
235
7,961
8,030
16
2,444
4,078
588
226
7,336
31,635
17
1,233
1,540
340
110
27,684
18
1,086
1,393
210
112
2,801
3,841
19
1,105
1,641
181
122
3,049
4,454
20
1,430
1,668
320
117
3,535
5,910
21
1,535
2,090
452
91
4,168
8,431
22
2,385
3,929
561
269
7,144
7,909
23
2,237
3,590
812
285
6,924
33,768
24
1,664
1,744
334
112
27,621
25
1,221
2,181
283
128
3,813
3,281
26
848
974
212
108
2,142
3,584
27
1,340
1,520
220
154
3,234
4,544
28
1,490
2,065
394
178
4,127
8,501
29
2,610
3,773
768
264
7,415
10,238
30
3,036
3,784
878
293
7,991
34,002
31
1,558
2,219
299
302
28,722
TOTAL
45,421
65,913
11,944
4,805
5,833
128,083
92 TOTAL
41,918
61,387
10,425
5,350
4,805
119,080
& OF SALE
35
51
9
4
4
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
OR DEC
9,003
18,053
8
$
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
OCTOBER
0
OCTOBER
TOTAL
1994 LIQUOR
BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
----------
1
_----------------------------------------------------
2,859
4,836
918
338
8,951
8,951
3
1,210
1,459
322
103
3,094
4
1,584
1,635
312
312
3,843
5
1,082
2,082
444
227
3,835
6
2,577
2,311
438
165
5,491
7
2,596
5,089
890
345
8,920
8
2,517
4,463
866
373
8,219
33,402
10
1,321
2,386
289
235
4,231
11
1,015
1,393
270
141
2,819
12
1,222
11919
362
149
3,652
13
1,655
2,286
308
181
4,430
14
2,742
4,658
760
313
8,473
15
2,957
3,863
924
286
8,030
31,635
17
1,233
1,540
340
110
3,223
18
1,506
1,769
439
127
3,841
19
1,471
2,561
276
146
4,454
20
1,723
3,679
381
127
5,910
21
3,140
4,283
685
323
8,431
22
2,966
3,907
758
278
7,909
33,768
24
1,664
1,744
334
112
3,854
25
1,154
1,683
349
95
3,281
26
1,236
1,748
443
157
3,584
27
1,607
2,381
434
122
4,544
28
2,663
4,635
820
383
8,501
29
3,117
5,847
891
383
10,238
34,002
31
1,558
2,219
299
302
4,378
4,378
TOTAL
50,375
76,376
13,552
5,833
146,136
93 TOTAL
45,421
65,913
11,944
4,805
128,083
1 OF SALE
34
52
9
4
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
18,053
14
t
_ 5
6
-3:
3-
r I nr
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING
Thursday, SEPT. 15, 1944.
Meeting called to order by President Nancy Alsop
Introduction of new board members:
Motion to approve the minutes of June 16, 1994 meeting Tebben/Canfield- Motion carried
III. Committee reports
a. Finance Committee (Rudningen) recommended and approve the following:
1. Motion by Rudningen /Johnson to approve May, June, July 1994 financial reports - Motion carried
2. Motion by Rudningen/Bohm to approve the bills. Motion carried
3. Motion by Kreie to allow staff authority to sign payroll if acceptable to auditor Motion carried
4. Motion by Rudningen/Ulrich to approve $2600.00 purchase of computer with CD ROM and Internet
capabilities for service center. Motion carried
b. Personnel Committee (Benson)
1. Health insurance contract will be reviewed by committee
2. Survey and Study of rural public libraries is ongoing.
c. Policy Committee ( Alsop)
3. A letter has been sent to legal firm re: legal review of borrowing authority, both long term and short term.
Possible amendments will be drafted for committee review.
d. System Study Committee ( Alsop)
1. Re: ESCU delivery - although there were some glitches, things seems to be satisfactory.
2. Assistant Director Kathy reported that the report of results accomplished required by the Office of Library
Development has been completed. Motion Bohm /Canfield to approve. Motion carried
e. System Facilities Committee (Dahl)
1. Letters were sent to Montevideo, Willmar, Chippewa County and Kandiyohi County indicating interest in
locating PLS combined administrative and service center. A statement of economic benefit to community
of such afacility.
f. Automation Committee (Kreie)
1. Questionnaire has been sent to each library to gather data needed to determine actual costs of an online
integrated automation system. Dynix, an automation vendor, will supply an estimated price quotation for
software based on information provided.
2. Pioneerland Library System now has Internet access at Willmar and Montevideo libraries paid for through
SAMMIE. Internet will be used for backup reference, professional development, and e-mail.
3. M of i o n Kreie /Brunner to purchase a Fax with $800.00 of funds from SAMMIE. If More than $800.00 is
needed then request for approval of funds from budget will be presented at next board meeting.
Motion carried
IV. Old Business
Rudningen reported on communications with Yellow Medicine County Board. They are going to continue
discussions with them and feel that misunderstandings seem to be the base of problems.
V. Report of Assistant Director
1. Kathy presented a proposed 1995 calendar, gave a report on expiring board member terms and a schedule of
local library board visits and Collaboration of grants.
VI. Report of Director.
1. Revised 1994 budget will be presented to PLS a Board for approval at Nov. 17 meeting. Proposed changes
will not increase any city, county, state or federal 1994 financial obligations. Changes are needed because of
increase of miscellaneous incomes and bookkeeping and reporting corrections. Cities and Counties are
responding positively to 1995 requests for increases hopefully because of the increased participation in the
budget process of head librarians and local board members.
2. Overview of current projected building projects at various cities in the system.
VII. Adjournment-
D. Brunner, Sec'y
0
*6 COUNTY
10/1/74 M- Lr r) COUNTY
14:54:22 021 CITY
- ---- ._.HUT(-HINSnN_
.__ DESCRIPTION
PTuNL_KLwNU #RY SYSTEM COUNTY 34
TnTC'+KAICU F LrA ;ICiAL YST-4
STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES AS OF 9 /30/94 E -J0:
CURRENT YEAR CURRENT
MONTH TO -DATE BUDUET
PJNDS
-
kEVENUES
RL SLRVC
_CITY uP ATING
COUNTY CRATING
STATE 7; ATING
PLnLRAL P F R A T TNG
CAPITAL
Si F TS
INTEREST
:HARGES, FTNES
CJPY MAC glgE
_ ;.UIPME_i!T R.NTALS_.
PAX MACHTNE
FJOK SALES
EXTENSION _.
9THEP
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITJRES
SALAPIES AND WAGES
HEALTH INSURANCL
HEALTH INSURANCE - DEOUCTIRLE
SS /PPRA /MCDICAPE
PJOKS
OLPIOJIi ALS
VIDEO TAPES
BIAli INGS
OGLC ANO OTHER CHARGES
C34 VENDI)K CHARGES
VEHICLE OPEKATTUN
VEHICLE INSUPANCE
TELEPHONE AND LINE CHARGES
PJSTAGE AND SHIPPING
NEW F"UIPMENT
MAINTENAN,;F AND CuNTRACTS
SJPPLIES ANu POINTING
_ PKOMOTTJNAL AND PUBLTC_TTY..
MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - STAFF
MILLAJE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES
.PROF. ME43ERSHIPS
WORK COMP /PROPERTY /LIABILITY INSURANCE
AUS AND LEGAL NOTICES
ADD I T 1 N
90OKKEEPT149
CUNTINUTNU EDUCATION
_... _. EXTENSION CONTRACTS
STATE SALES TAX
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL FUNDS
9
IP59ln PAGE �y
In/21/94 14:42:^1
X OF X OF
BOOT YEAR
•u0
sr
.n0
is
12,9I3.u000
a+
0
75
.u0
to
51.50.16Ck
a«
66,75o.UOLP
tr
75
75
ti.08�.PnCP
Ps
39,534.0008
r.
39.b34.j%P
sr
IUn
75
.00
et
.nj
td
.00
♦t
.nJ
as
.Jn
st
.OL
a+
5U.00L0
Pa
0
75
740.JOCR
+•
1,712.09CR
r«
39U.UnbR
+r
439
7S
.JD
aP
.OU
ri
5b.35LR
to
21R.55CR
r«
.u0
ar
5.nJCK
r.
.On
e♦
20.nUCR
er
.UO
+r
.n0
as
1,Sn4.650.
4a
1,90P..55Ck
+r
e00.0%R
tr
31R
15
.Jn
er
.n0
««
.JO
rs
407.3uCk
et
12,186.50CR
sas
95.434.55CR
«+«
122,253.000R
r►r
78
75
u,u57.71
a+
51,049.40
s«
71.98u.u0
tP
72
IS
155.76
+s
1,159.7d
to
984.00
+•
119
75
.UO
ar
320.00
se
320.00
«s
l00
75
o27.u2
sa
5,427.52
e.
7.43d.Jn
r+
13
7S
,,775.Un
+r
9,R39.ld
♦♦
2U,unu.un
ar
4n
75
47.00
sr
3,15 ^.54
.♦
�.UnO.Un
ar
lus
15
.DO
P♦
.n0
rt
.u0
ra
7.67
+a
1Ou.u0
++
8
75
.Un
+♦
no
s«
.UO
sr
.OU
tr
.UO
ea
.Ou
e«
.Jn
rr
.OU
rr
.Jn
tr
.nu
ae
61.U0
es
670.00
+t
90U.UO
r+
74
i5
.JO
is
4,92n.n0
st
0'000.UO
+♦
on
75
.00
ee
3i0.50
rt
.u0
rr
2U2_.06
as
51)u.UO
r+
41
75
.00
to
.13.50
t+
95.J0
s+
30
75
.UO
■4
.00
rt
.00
+s
.OU
e«
.Jn
Pa
.0U
+«
.00
ae
1,100.98
♦i
1,b94.On
ss
o5
75
.jr)
ar
.nu
+t
.u0
sa
__. 56.06
•+ _
_ 53.00. _.,
+a
d9
75
9.09
t■
31.91
r•
113.00
t«
T2
15
.UO
ar
.00
r.
.DO
+a
.OU
+«
l0U.u0
ar
120.0u
r+
99.00
+r
308
75
ulb38.58
♦ra
79,230.72
+ ++
113,16o.00
rsr
70
75
.1,347.92CR
tsir
16a2U3.83CR
Pses
99U87.000R
«a+a
178
75
0
no CnUNTY
1 u/[9/94 M� cFjD CJUNTY
14:47:IC 021 CITY
4JTL4 INoO.V
DESCRIPTION
FUNDS
REVONUcS
PEStRVE
CITY OPERATING
COUNTY JPERATING
STATE OPERATING
FcOERAL OPERATING
CAPITAL
;IFTS
TNTCRcST
CHARGES, FINES
OJPY MACHINE
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
FAX . MACHINE
9JOK SALF�
rXTE%.TJN
OTHER
TJTAL REVENUES
tXPrNOITURES
SA(ARIES AND WAGSS
4.AcT4 INSURANCE
HEALTH INSURANCL - DEJULTLBLE
`.S/PERA /MEDICARE
BJJKS
PERIODICALS
VIDEO TAPES
9INUINils
%LC AND JTHER CHARGES
CJM VENJDR CHARGES
VEHICLE OPERATION
VEHICLE INSURANCE
TLLE °HONE AND LINE CHARGES
PUSTAGF AND SHIPPING
VLH EJUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS
SUPPLIES ANU - PRINTING
PROMOTIONAL AND PUBLICITY
°ILEAGE AND MEETINGS - STAFF
MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES
OKOF. MEMbERSHIPS
0
PTuNLFALANU LTUPARY SY,TEM LOUNTY 34
TNTLr.nA1F.W f 114AAC1AL aYbTL4
STATEMENT OF REVENUES ANU EXPENDITURES AS OF d/31/94
CURRENT YEAR
MONTH TO -DATE
_ WORK OMP /PROPERTY /LIA_BILITY INSURANCE
ADS 40 LEGAL NJTICES
AUDITINb
_ BUOKKEEPING_
__- C34TTN'JING EDUCATION
EXTENSTJN CONTRACTS
STATE SALES_ TA_X__
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL FUNDS
0
IFSS70 PAGE 20
Fin: In/2u/94 14:25:2o
CURRENT X OF X OF
BUDGET dDGT YEAR
.JO
a
.;10
r+
12.Y13.0OLR
k.
0
o7
519567.nuck
.k
6d975o.00LR
kt
75
67
.JO
+a
29.6�O.SJCR
a•
399534.0009
r.
75
07
.UD
ar
.DU
.JO
rw
.DG
s.
.DD
..
,00
.r
6U.0OCP
.t
0
u7
3,.�%R
•.
973.99CR
as
SnU.UnLP
.•
250
07
.JO
.r
.n0
ra
.JO
+.
I00.2UCR
as
5.u0CR
+s
5.000R
t+
.u0
sr
20.000K
at
.JO
as
.DO
aw
1 ?6.DnLR
+r
404.nOCR
.+
onJ.Jn,R
..
07
07
.JO
as
.OU
ar
.UO
ar
40.36Cn
t.
166.000R
trt
839248.OSCR
t.p
122.253.000R
rti
6B
0
7.509.28
rt
45091.69
s♦
719990.00
s.
o4
67
,44.72
+♦
1.064.0[
•+
9R4.U0
a9
102
07
.UO
ks
32('.00
a.
3 ?0 .u0
as
lun
o7
577.JO
rr
4.93C.S0
r+
79436.u0
tt
65
07
1.u67.98 -
•t
9.064.88
.t
2U.00J.GO
.a
,0
u7
20.d3
+r
39163.54
at
39un0.00
+•
Iu3
07
.GO
rw
00
a.
.JO
+a
7.67
♦+
1OD.u0
ka
R
07
.JO
s►
.n0
.e
.UO
.a
.nu
pr
.00
.r
.00
rr
.UO
kr
.OU
sr
.UO
.r
.n0
rs
67.u0
.♦
6U3.OU
ka
900.00
st
07
u7
.JO
..
49820.00
t.
69u0U.UO
►a
b0
b7
.uO
as
310.56
♦a
_
26.72
sa
2U2.98
.a
500.00
t♦
41
07
.00
+.
13.50
ar
35.00
t♦
39
67
.UO
t.
.nu
a
.00
t.
.00
rr
.00
+r
.Ou
..
.UO
kr
1.100.98
a.
19004.Un
ka
65
67
_.UO
rs
.00
p+
.UO
at
56.06
.+
63.00
ks
69
67
_ 9.09
k+
72.72
at
113.60
to
64
07
.DO
r.
.00
s.
.00
ap
,00
♦k
.Do
.t
20.00
t+
39.00
kt
51
67
89322.62
_
st♦ -
70.392.14
ttt
1139166.00
ttt - -
-62
67
89156.62
tt►s
129855.91CR
tttt
99087.00LR
ttst
141
67
PIUNL-RLA'rJ 041Y SYSTCM
U.%41Y
34
IU /C 5/94
1,�TLGk AT =u FTNA;�CIAL
SYST-M
1FSSO0
°ASc 1
6:37:21 COMBINED
BALANCE SHEET
AS OF
9/30/94
EJO:
10/21/94
14:47: ^1
THIS
LAST
% OF
% OF
_. _.... DESCRIPTION
- YEAR
YEAR
BUDGET
BDGT
YEAR
ASSETS
C.SK
415,64U.19
<r
,DU
♦•
PETTY CASH
1,770.j7
••
,ro
a•
.. SAVIN,;S A0CJU;JT
.UO
<s
.DU
rt
AJTJMATI'1N SAVTNGU
Jr) .
*a
.OU
r•
AUTOMATI'1r. 0D'S
.UJ
to
.00
•♦
VCHICLF A43KT SAVINGS
.uO
H
.0u
VEHICLE AMDR' CJ'S
.u0
+<
.00
<+
PKFPAID EXPENSE
1.53o.31
♦s
.00
r<
_ .... _Vi.HiCLES
14.749.00
s<
.00_
rr
FUR.NTS4I "i.,S E FuUIP4FNT
11 a,76,.uf)
rr
.OU
�JOKS, PAINTTNGS. ETC.
19C53,z79.01
+r
.Du
••
_ -_ ALCUMULATED DEPRELIATIDN- VEHICLLS
__ T.U75.000R
+•
.01
A�'UMULAT,D DEPREOIATIDN -FURN. G cOUIP.
76,56J.UOLR
•r
.00
a<
ACCUMULATED AHORTIZAT11N- u3JKS,PAINIIN ^S
503,456.000R
<a
.00
<•
TOTAL ASSETS
29017,542.07
r *rr
.DO
♦rp
_
LI461LITIcS AND FUNU BALANCE
LIABiLITIES
ALCuUNTS PAYABLE
329J4l.660
*•._
.0u
•<
ACCRUED WAGES
36.341.u3LR
•r
00
r<
_
ACCRUE^ BENEFITS PAYABLE
.00
<t
,0U
r•
TOTAL LIABILITIES_ _
70,689.49CR
+rs
.Op _
♦rr
-.
FUND RALANCF
UN^ESLRVFU FUND BALANCE
7y,4%.4SL0
•9
.D0
■+
FURNITUKE E EWUI°MENT PESEP.VE
1.o96,J95.UILR.
+a
.OJ
t•
_ _-
_,
VEHICLF PUR04ASE KESERVE
7,1R5.J3LR
tt
.DU
♦•
AUTJMAT114 RESERVE
62,u16.57LP
A*
.00
rr
-
__ LIBRARIES
9u.321.45LR
at
.Ou
as
lFT RcSFRVc
164.410
•r
.DO
as
CUMPUIEK RESERVE
I,,u35.uOCP
••
.Op
a•
... _. -..__. CURkFNT YaAk WET
10a,464.o6CP
•a
.Ou
<r
5u,o60.u%R
<• 190
75
TOTAL FUND BALANCE
1,946,852.58CP
* q
.00
rr•
569660.000R
rrr 3436
75
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
2,017,542.07CP
sr N
.00
•rrr
569660.000R
****3561
75
I 0TH /94
1.,147:35 COMBINED
UESCRIPTION
PI WIt °kLAKJ q9Y lYoTt" LnU4iY 34
TNTC;RAIFu N71AL >YiT,4
STATEMLNT OF RCV EJ ANU L%PENOITJRLS AS OF 9/30/94
CURRENT YEAR
MONTH TU -UATE
ruNUS
REVE NULS
RESERVE
CITY JPERATING
S.iUNTY UPERATING
STAFF �-PFR W NG
FEDERAL OPERATING_.
CAPITAL
,IFTS
INTEREST
CHAkiLS, FIVES
'.J. ^Y MALHINE
,. _- FyUIPMFiTT RENTALS
FAX MACHT14E
RJOK TALES
-FAT,NSIUN _.
nTH-P
TOTAL REVENUES
_ c%PE 101TUR.S
SALARIFS A40 WAGFS
HEALTH IMSURANCE
_ HEALTH INSURA14CE - UFDUCTI9LE
SS /PERA /4EDICAPE
9J'IKS
.. DLR10J :LALS ..__. ..
VIDEO TAPES
91NDINGS
OCLC APJ JTHFR LHARG.ES _
CJM VcNJOR LHAPGFS
VEHICLE OPERATION
VEHICLE TNSJRANCE ___
TELEPHONF AND LINE CHARGES
PuSTA .3E AND SHIPPING
NEW EQUIPMENT
MAINTzNANCF ANTI CONTRACTS
SUPPLIES ANU PRINTING
PROM ^,TIU4AL AND PUOLTLITY
41LLAUE ANO MEETINGS - STAFF
MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES
PROF. MEMBERSHIPS
WJRK COMP /PROPPRTY /LFA9ILITY INSURANCE
AUS AND LEGAL NOTICES
AJDITINJ_____._
900KKEEPING
CONTINUING EDUCATION
__. FKTLNSIUN CONTRACTS__.._
STATE SALES TAX
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Tn TA1 CuMnf
.u0 of
i00,507.50uR •,
9T.902.75uR rs
.u0 *t
.JO tt
.00 a►
2.2SU.00LR +.
961.R ,+
291.u5uR r*
1.2nu.u6CR t+
ab.1nCR ►.
13. i%R ♦♦
1.77U.U5LR e+
223.98CR w.
1,u 37.2304 ►.
20a,336.19CR *P*
7v,29U.40 ar
4,401.96 t.
4o.d0 *a
v,UlO.bO °+
14.295.34 ►,
S 01.u0 ►+
233.73 *►
.UO ,♦
`761.U9 +►
.J0 Pa
5,75.31 r►
1,279.25 *r
6n1.d2 •e
3,u3i.24 *►
391.98 ++
4,312.06 ««
35.9Q ♦♦
14u.26 Pw
520.98 to
.u0 «.
.110 +*
.00 +a
30U.u0 +«
994.22 ++
So.43 «*
416.00 *+
1249584.41 * **
_81,751,77CR *y*
.00 *a
474,725.75CR ►*
483,557.25CK at
IdI9061.000K .*
60,616.000k et
J2,7970UCR ,*
7,962.54CR st
3,719.27CK P♦
293u7.TvCR is
14.040.46CR e*
3d9.9JCk a«
laO.2UCK e+
3,74807CR ►+
14,1i4.33CR .+
39.746.44CR tt
19319,146.94CR Pq
714,3�6.2U *«
30,509.12 et
1.993.76 +a
82.804.11 to
1289668.61 *+
55.990.15 +►
3,637.55 s,
138.22 °+
17,925.89 Pa
22,442.67 e.
i9. 519.11 t+
900.86 ,*
11,431.50 **
10,315.05 **
66,502.93 ««
5,9P3.59 sr
2100.70 ►w
3,279.50 sa
S,Otl2.30 .«
4,733.19 et
40.00 *f
129240.00 r*
49.90 t*
1,850.90 **
2,709.09 **
19485.13 f*
99097.97 t+
I.191.2u s,
19216,884.28 a «►
102,262.66CR *w*
L PA,c
`u0: 10 1/94 1v:4�:F'
CURRENT X OF X OF
BUDGET BOGT YEAR
112,063.00uP
*f
n
75
54u,U29.JOGP
rP
08
75
b12.964.uCCR
tw
79
75
383,179.00LP
P.
,7
Ti
64.a81.000R
*►
51
75
10.162.UOLR
at
77
7s
1,tl0u.U0L9
P►
211
75
17U.000 *t b259 75
1930J.U%P
q
2dR
75
6.000.0 ^CR
♦•
236
TS
41,307.0%-
««
96
75
197739945.UOLR
+a+
74
75
19u150527.u0
*e
70
75
36.416.00
is
tl4
75
1:,227.00
a+
14
75
121,133.U0
re
09
75
2029733.00
*0
63
75
34.22u.U0
*+
94
75
6.194.00
*,
59
75
1.245.00
«s
11
75
22,U7U.Un
«*
al _.
75
2b,00u.00
*f
d6
75
11.35u.UO
*a
173
15
e.30J.un
*a
40
75
21.290.00
**
54
75
16,573.00
«*
02
15
72.794.0^
•*
91
75
2U.u38.UO
►f
29
7S
29,21j.00
**
75
75
4,u41.J^
«*
71
7R
IJ,096.00
as
J9
7S
8,006.00
*►
59
75
13.269.00
w♦
92
75
1,ul5.J0
rr
5
75
2,098.00
►*
d4
75
3,5'0.,)0
+■
76
75
4,590.00
+t
33
75
69000.,)0
•+
102
75
5,029.00
*.
24
75
19717,285.00
ft♦
71
75
_._ 5o,b60.000R
+a *►_
_ 180_
_ _75
MTONLERLANI :!..GARY SYyTcM
_ _ _ INTtG.AAT'J rli,A,ICIAL SYyTcM
15:59:32 COMBINED - BALANCE SHEET
DESCRIPTION
ASSETS
CASH
Dt TTY CA ',l
SAVINGS ALCOUi•T
AUTUPATION SAVTNSS
AJTOMATIIN UD'S _.
VEHICLE AMORT SAVINGS
VE41CLE A40RT COOS
°REPAID FAPFNSE --
V'_HICLF>
FURNISHINGS E FMUIPMENT
-- - 0J0 {Sr PAIYTINSS, ETC.
ALCOMJLATLO OEbRECIATION- VEHILLES
_.. _ ACCJMJLATED OEPi(ECTATMN -FURN. G EQUIP.
ALCUMJLA% D AMnRTlLATION- UOUKS•PAINTTNGS
TOTAL ASSETS
L143ILTTIES AND EJNU BALANCE
LIA91LITiEy
A uCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCRUED WAGES _
ACCR'JcD MENtFITS PAYABLt _
TMAL LIABILITIES
FUND BALANCE
UNREStRGED FUND _ BALANCE
FJRNITURE G EQUIPMENT REStvV°
VEHICLE PURCHASE RESERVE
AJTJ4ATI ^'4 nFSERVE
LIORAATtS
9iFT REyERVE
:OMPUTER HESEnVE -- - - -_-
LJRnENT YEAR NET
TOTAL FUND BALANCE _
TOTAL LIAdILITTES AND FUND BALANCE
0
LOuNTY 3-,
IFSSbO
AS OF 8/31/94 FuD: 10/2J/94 14:Z5:?o
THIS
LAST
X OF
X OF
YEAR
YEAR
BUDGET
80GT
YEAR
041.161.94
+r
.0L
s♦
1r77T.y9
*t
.n,
.♦
.UD
ai
.0U
s•
.JO
s•
. ^,p
as
.v0
+r
.DL
as
.u0
a*
.nu
•r
.40
*r
,nu
it
I.39o.33
*k
.00
sa
14,74d.vD
•r
,nU
k«
lv9. 754.00
it
no
•t
2•J`3,ZT9.00
ar
,BU
at
1.375,JOCR
to
,no
a•
7L,563.000R
••
,00
.i
D93.458.UOLR
+a
.Ou
as
1,9429730.76
q q
.00
***•
?9.Z96.32CR
34.J41.63CR
«s
,O0
a+
.u0
e.
.00
a«
779629.95CR
sas
.00
r **
7,,,47L.46LR
as
.Ov
ar
1.506,395.000R
•a
00
it
7.195.J3LR
e*
,00
*k
62•U16.57LR
•e
- ,O0
to
vU•321.45LR
•*
,no
♦r
.64,4104
to
.00
et
1Z•U35.vOCR
no
as
?0,510.cOCR
■r
no
as
So,65U.00LR
to 36
57
1,865,1OU.8ICR
+ri
no
s*s
56966U.00LR
s*♦ 3292
67
1994Z9730.75CR
**s*
no
*ta*
5b,b6O.000R
•***3429
67
0 1
PIU ".EEKLkN� LIoPARY :iY >TLW
I 0/2:1/94 1 f T t C, A T E PINANC I A L SYSTEM
14:41:5b COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
DESCRIPTION
FUNDS
REVENUES
R,SEOVE
CITY OPERATING
_ C:.UNTY JP:RATING
STATE OPERATING
PEDERAL OPERATING
,',AMITAL
GIFTS -
TATE4EST
CHARGES, FINES
CJPY MACHINE
EJUIPMFNT RENTALS
FAX MACHINE
901K SALES
EXTLN3IJN
0T4cR
TOTAL REVENUES - -- _
EXPENDITURLS
SALARIES AND WAGES
HEALTH INSURANCE
4cALTH IM�URANCE - OFUUCTIBLP
_ S4 /PFKA /ME0ICARt
OD9KS
PtRIDDTCALS
VIDEO TAoES
_.91140 T'lSS
%L: ANJ JTHFR CHARGES
COW VENDOR CHARGES
VEHICLE OPERATION
VcHICLF INSURANCE
TZLEPH14E AND LINE CHARGES
oJSTAGE AND SHIPPING
NEW EJUIPMENT
MATNTtNANCE AND CJNTRACTS
SUPPLIES ANU PRINTING �
PROMOTIONAL AND PUBLICITY
_ MILEAGE AVD MEETINGS - STAFF
MILEAGE AND MLFTINGS - TRUSTEES
PROF. Mc MdERSHIPS
_ NJRK_ COMP /PROPERTY /LIA_B_ILITY INS'JRANCc
AJS AND LEGAL NOTICES
AUDITING
POOKKtEPING
C04TTNU14G EDUCATION
EXTENSION CJNTRACTS
STATE SALES TA_X__
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL FUNDS
Is
COuNTY 3,
IFS570 PAGt
AS OF 8/31/94 FUD: 10/20/94 14 :25:7
LURRENT
YEAR
CURRENT
Y OF
A OF
MONTH
TO -DATE
BUDGET
BDGT
YEAR
.JO
+a
.00
••
112,J63.U0L0
r•
D
07
.JO
+.
374,21P.'5CK
re
S4u,,29.UOCR
as
o9
07
.JO
a•
3o5,754.SUCk
•s
o12,964.U0CR
rr
o3
o7
1 ^19UDu.b%R
+a
161,0o1.0JCK
a+
383,179.000R
er
47
67
.u0
++
60,616.0008
as
.UO
a,
32,797.oUCk
••
64,d8i.000R
rr
51
o7
133.u0CR
rs
5,612.54CR
90
1J,162.JOL4
rr
SS
b7
56L.17CR
+r
3,3u2.31Cft
e+
1rUD0.U0C4
a♦
I0
67
c44.31CR
r♦
2,075.1,CK
+s
"430.89CP.
er
12,837.42CR
r•
17U.U0LR
+a
7551
67
R7.60CR
rr
351.90Ck
++
6.UOLR
ea
166.3UCk
ra
936.d2CR
,+.
1,978.02Ck
rs
1.30J.UOLR
ar
152
07
416.03
es
13,030.37CR
ae
0.J^U.000o
ra
232
67
I,U53.29C4
+9
38,1U9.21CK
•r
41,397.ODCR
+a
92
07
I11,U43.51CR
ara
1,112,810.76CR
srr
1,7739945.000R
N+
63
67
70,695.19
rr
635,005.9U
es
1,u15,527.U0
ra
b3
07
�999o.27
rs
26,1U7.16
sr
3o,410.00
+r
72
67
,u9
P•
1,946.96
•r
19227.00
r•
14
07
9,UF.a.02
s+
13,791.31
ar
1219133.00
sr
of
67
14,542.20
rs
114,393.23
•0
202,733.00
+•
56
o7
).250.,9
•.
35,463.15
9r
36,22U.00
ra
93
67
215.90
+♦
3,4U302
rr
6,19,.00
rs
55
67
.UO
rr
138.22
*4r
_
1,245.00
►r
11
o7
.UD
•+
16,964.8D
ar
22.000.00
r+
77
67
.DO
ae
22,442.67
ss
20,u00.u0
++
66
b7
0,390.73
♦♦
1398o2.8U
rr
11,350.00
rs
122
67
.JO
rr
9300o
+♦
2,30U.00
ra
40
67
1,210.77
+r
10,157.25
,r
21,200.uO
+r
48
07
672.19
a•
9,713.23
sr
lo,573.00
+a
59
o7
2,415.34
ra
03,567.59
as
74,79,.00
it
07
07
X77.34
as
5.461.61
a
20,038.00
se
27
67
1,766.47
••
19,610.40
sr
29,213.u0
♦s
o7
67
24b.71
+a
3,243.60
ar
49o41.00
+r
70
07
492.65
ss
4,942.10
rs
13,000.09
rr
38
07
913.49
rr
4,212.21
rr
d,000.00
rt
53
o7
.00
a♦
40.OJ
+s
.00
9a
12,240.00
++
13.269.00
ar
92
67
10.00
s9
49.96
+t
I,UI5.00
_
ar -
- 5
o7
.u0
ra
1050.00
ra
2,098.00
ar
89
67
309. J9
♦r
ss
3,570.00
►+
67
07
9.09LR
+a
_21409.09
500.91
re
4,500.00
ra
11
67
461.11
ra
9,040.94
rr
6,000.U0
rr
151
67
.UO_
+a
775.70
5.U29.00
07
_
1329391.26
a +r
_•a
19092,299.87
_
ara
_ra
19717,285.00
♦rr
__15
-64
67
219347.75
rrar
20,510.89CR
rasa
569660.000R
■aaa
36
67
