cp05-22-1990 cHUTCHINSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
Mn ?O TO m 26
1990
WEDNESDAY
-23-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeti
at City Hall
5:00 P.M. - Tree Board
Meeting at
Public Library
Conference Room
SUNDAY
-20-
THURSDAY
-24-
Noon — Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns Manor
M0NDAY
-21-
Noon — Safety Council Meeting
at Heritage Center
1:00 P.M. — Utilities Commissic
at Utilities Office
2:00 P.M.- Open Bids at City
Hall for Letting
No. 4
FRIDAY
-25-
TUFF �Y
-22-
7:30 Y.M. - City Council
Meeting at City
Hall
SATURDAY
-26-
ij
AGENDA
• REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 22, 1990
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Walter D. Marth, Peace Lutheran Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 8, 1990
and Bid Openings of May 7, 1990 and May 15, 1990
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - April 1990
2. Building Official's Report - April 1990
3. Airport Commission Minutes - April 30, 1990
4. Planning Commission Minutes - April 17, 1990
• 5. Nursing Home Board Minutes - April 26, 1990
6. Hospital Board Minutes - April 17, 1990
7. Senior Advisory Board Minutes - April 18, 1990
(b) Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Hutch Huskies
Amateur Baseball Association from May 20 to Sept. 1
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and issue
license
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
(a) Assessment Roll No. 257 - Letting No. 3, Project 90 -09,
90 -10, 90 -11, 90 -12
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject -
Motion to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 257
and award contract - Motion to waive readings and adopt
Revised Resolution No. 9240 And Resolutions No. 9260 &
No. 9261
•
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 22, 1990 •
(b) Assessment Roll No. 258 - Letting No. 8, Project 90 -16
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject -
Motion to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 258 and
award contract - Motion to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 9262
6. Communications, Requests And Petitions
None
7. Resolutions And Ordinances
(a) Ordinance No. 90 -20 - An Ordinance Of The City Of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, Amending City Code Section 3.01
Defining Utility Service; And By Adopting By Reference,
City Code Chapter 1 And Section 2.99 Which, Among Other
Things, Contain Penalty Provisions
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second
reading and adopt •
(b) Resolution No. 9263 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
8. Unfinished Business
None
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Rate Adjustments Requested By Junker
Sanitation
Action -
(b) Consideration of Request By Junker Sanitation for Rate
Increase for Yardage Use At Landfill
Action -
2
•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 22, 1990
(c) Consideration of Establishing Date for Junker
Sanitation Board of Review In June
Action -
(d) Consideration of Sanitary Service for Carlie Karg And
Don Gilbertson
Action -
(e) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment
Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 5,
Project No. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll
preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive readings
and adopt Resolutions No. 9264 & No. 9265
(f) Consideration of Request To
First Avenue Southeast From
• Street for Farmer's Market
Action - Motion to reject -
(g) Consideration of Awarding B
Action - Motion to reject -
award contract
Mark Parking Spaces On
Main Street to Hassan
Motion to approve
id for Front -End Loader
Motion to approve and
(h) Consideration of Police Chief Attending F.B.I. School
In January 1991
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(i) Consideration of Results of Additional Signatures of
Petitions for Sunday Liquor
Action -
(j) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment
period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
0 3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 22, 1990
•
(k) Consideration of ordering Preparation of Assessment
Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 5,
Project No. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll
preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive readings
and adopt Resolutions No. 9266 & No. 9267
(1) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
American Legion To Move 10 X 12 Utility Shed with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9268
(m) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Harvey Getz To Move 10 X 16 Utility Shed with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(n) Consideration of Sketch Plan On Adrey Johnson Estate •
Requested By Dave Lorence (Two Mile Radius) with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County
(o) Considertion of Final Plat of Miller Townhouse Sixth
Addition with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9269
(p) Presentation Regarding Mobile Scrap Yards By Jay
Freedland
Action -
(q) Discussion of Municipal Code Revisions, Chapter 12:
Subdivision Regulations (Platting) By City Engineer
Action -
4 0
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 22, 1990
(r) Consideration of Trailer Court Water Usage
Action -
(s) Consideration of Evacuation Plan for Country Club
Terrace Mobile Home Park
Action -
(t) Consideration of Repair to Fire Department Ladder Truck
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(u) Consideration of Street Light Relocation On Main Street
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(v) Consideration of Amendment No. 1 To Site Purchase
Agreement for Shopko Project
• Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
10. Mi scellaneous
•
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. Adjournment
5
1
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ack-
land. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland,
Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don
Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz,
City Engineer John Rodeberg, Finance Director Kenneth B.
Merrill, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend David Anderson.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of April 24, 1990, bid
opening of April 24, 1990 and special meeting of April 30,
1990 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
• (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES - APRIL 30, 1990
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES - MARCH 28, 1990
(b) REDUCED TRASH AND REFUSE RATE
(c) APPOINTMENT OF KEVIN COMPTON TO POLICE CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to order report
and minutes filed, approve reduced rate and ratify ap-
pointment.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 256 - LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT 90 -08
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4107 on Project No. 90 -08.
Mr. Kelton Goranson, 586 Monroe Street, expressed con -
concern of the use of the road as a 3M truck route and
• asked if anything could be done to resolve the problem.
1
o��
T
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
He stated there was
on the street. Mr.
assessment would be
had curb and gutter
Also, he wanted to
ceive.
a lot of damage and frost pockets
Goranson questioned if the actual
what was stated on the notice if he
and was hooked up to the sewer.
know how much credit he would re-
Engineer Rodeberg reported that the street had never
been surfaced. Therefore, the residents would be
assessed a residential surfacing rate. The City was
thinking of signing it for "no truck traffic." The
City would be picking up 45% of the project cost, in-
cluding extra asphalt. The four inch line on the east
side of the street would be abandoned. If a property
owner was already connected to the 12 inch water line
on the west, he /she would not be assessed; no one would
be assessed for a previous assessment project.
•
Mr. Bob Hall, 345 Monroe Street, commented he lived on
the corner of Monroe and Fourth Street. He gets flood-
ed out every time it rains; therefore, he would like to .
see the project go up Fourth Street to reduce the water
flow from the west, north and east. The storm drain
does not take the water fast enough and it comes onto
his lawn, covering 80 percent of it during a heavy
rain. Mr. Hall reported he had been assessed twice for
the storm sewer but no credit was shown. He wondered
why everyone wasn't hooked up when the line was discon
nected for work as it would have been cheaper at that
time.
Mr. Earl Fitzloff commented that he formerly lived on,
Monroe Street and was hooked up on the west side. The=
east side hookup was an option.
Engineer Rodeberg stated there was no grade on the
streets, but they are trying to add some slope and a
couple catch basins to reduce the problem. The storm
sewer is undersized, but the water problem is to the
east in the streets that are not paved.
Mr. Ray Otto, 529 Monroe Street, stated he was opposed
to the project.
Mr. Leslie Smith, 346 Monroe Street, said he already
had curb and gutter on the short side of his property •
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
•
and was hooked up when the new line was put in. There-
fore, his assessment should be corrected.
Mr. Tim Zumach, 643 Adams Street, asked what would be
done on Fair Avenue and if a sidewalk would be put in.
Engineer Rodeberg responded that a sidewalk would go on
the north side of the street but there would be no
assessment. The existing blacktop would be removed and
a new surface laid. The 3M Company would be assessed a
large amount of the cost.
An unidentified lady asked if a stop sign could be put
up to stop 3M traffic. It is difficult for her to get
out of her driveway onto the street.
Mr. Gerald Zimmerman, Secretary of the McLeod County
Fair Board, inquired about the frontage that the
assessment was figured on. He stated the organization
did not have funds available to pay the assessment.
Engineer Rodeberg responded the assessment was for 463
feet.
Ms. Michelle Helmbrecht, 537 Monroe Street, reported
they were doing some improvements to their yard and had
removed the sidewalk. She wondered if they should wait
until the City completed its improvement before replac-
ing the sidewalk and seeding the lawn.
Mr. Dallas Hansen, 516 Monroe Street, stated he had an
empty lot. He wondered why the assessment was high
compared to other assessments.
Engineer Rodeberg commented that the driveway was the
reason. Mr. Hansen could request a smaller driveway
replacement and be assessed for that size, or he had
the option to do the driveway himself.
Alderman Torgerson moved to close the hearing at 8:32
P.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Erickson and unani-
mously carried.
Mayor Ackland read a letter from Joann Jessen in which
she stated her inability to pay a large assessment at
• this time.
3
L
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
Randy and Judy Otto expressed their objection to the
improvement in a letter read by the Mayor.
A letter from Larry and Gayle Maurer was read in which
they were opposed to the curbing and gutter work.
Alderman Torgerson moved to approve and adopt Assess-
ment Roll No. 256, award contract to Wm. Mueller &
Sons, Inc. for $374,441.54, and to waive readings and
adopt Resolutions No. 9248 and No. 9249. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried.
R
COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) DISCUSSION OF 1990 BUDGET CUT
Finance Director Ken Merrill reported on the State
budget cuts for cities. The new law would reduce
government aids by about $58,000, which would impact
the City's general fund. Director Merrill will in-
struct the directors to make departmental budget cuts,
and he will make a recommendation to the City Council.
(b) REPORT BY CITY ENGINEER ON ASSESSMENT FOR GLEN STREET
BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE S.W. AND WASHINGTON AVENUE AND
FIRST AVENUE S.W.
Engineer Rodeberg presented a report on the proposed
project and the assessment cost. It was determined
that the school district should be contacted regarding
the cost, and no action was taken.
(c) CORRESPONDENCE FROM MONA JOHNSON AND MARGARET NORTON
REGARDING INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHT AND STREET
SURFACING
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to refer
the street light request to the utilities. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
7
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 9247 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading
4
•
•
E
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 8, 1990
1.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ack-
land. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland,
Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don
Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz,
City Engineer John Rodeberg, Finance Director Kenneth B.
Merrill, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend David Anderson.
3.
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of April 24, 1990, bid
opening of April 24, 1990 and special meeting of April 30,
1990 were approved as distributed.
4.
ROUTINE ITEMS
•
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES - APRIL 30, 1990
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES - MARCH 28, 1990
(b) REDUCED TRASH AND REFUSE RATE
(c) APPOINTMENT OF KEVIN COMPTON TO POLICE CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to order report
and minutes filed, approve reduced rate and ratify ap-
pointment.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 256 - LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT 90 -08
MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING HILL BE READY ON MONDAY.
1
Cr
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990 0
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) DISCUSSION OF 1990 BUDGET CUT
Finance Director Ken Merrill reported on the State
budget cuts for cities. The new law would reduce
government aids by about $58,000, which would impact
the City's general fund. Director Merrill will in-
struct the directors to make departmental budget cuts,
and he will make a recommendation to the City Council.
(b) REPORT BY CITY ENGINEER ON ASSESSMENT FOR GLEN STREET
BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE S.W. AND WASHINGTON AVENUE AND
FIRST AVENUE S.W.
Engineer Rodeberg presented a report on the proposed
project and the assessment cost. It was determined
that the school district should be contacted regarding
the cost, and no action was taken.
(c) CORRESPONDENCE FROM MONA JOHNSON AND MARGARET NORTON •
REGARDING INSTALLATION OF STREET LIGHT AND STREET
SURFACING
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to refer
the street light request to the utilities. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 9247 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
(b) ORDINANCE NO. 90 -18 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 2.70
DISPOSAL OF ABANDONED MOTOR VEHICLES, UNCLAIMED
PROPERTY AND EXCESS PROPERTY; AND BY ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
second reading and adopt. •
2
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
(c) ORDINANCE NO. 90 -19 - RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO
CONNECTION; WATER AND SEWER SERVICES
The motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Ald-
erman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive second
reading and adopt.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a)
CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR HUTCHINSON AIRPORT CONSULTANT SERVICES
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and enter into agreement and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9250. Motion seconded by Alderman
Lenz and unanimously carried.
. (b)
CONSIDERATION OF MUNICIPAL AIRPORT PAINT STRIPING
AGREEMENT WITH MN /DOT
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and enter into agreement and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9251. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(c)
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMODELING OF BURNS
MANOR NURSING HOME
Administrator Robert Koepcke presented the recommenda-
tion for Burns Manor remodeling at an estimated cost
of $300,000.
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and and advertise for bids on May 31, 1990. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF RENEWING USE OF EXTRA CAPACITY BY PURE
CULTURE PRODUCTS AT WASTEWATER FACILITY
Following discussion, Alderman Lenz moved to approve
• renewal of existing policy. Motion seconded by Alder -
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990 0
man Torgerson and unanimously carried.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH PERIGON
SYSTEMS FOR PUMP CONTROL SYSTEM
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and enter into agreement. Motion seconded by
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT
ROLL AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 8,
PROJECT NO. 90 -16, T.H. 7 EAST
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve
roll preparation, to hold hearing May 22, 1990 at 8:00
P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No.
9252 and No. 9253. Motion seconded by Alderman Erick-
son and unanimously carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
LETTING NO. 11, PROJECT NO. 90 -21, AND ADVERTISING FOR .
BIDS
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the proposed plans for a
left -turn lane at the intersection of Hwy. 15 and South
Grade Road. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson
moved to approve the plans and specifications, to ad-
vertise for bids and to waive readings and adopt Reso-
lutions No. 9254 and No. 9255. Motion seconded by Ald-
erman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH JUUL
CONTRACTING FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO WATER TREATMENT PLANT
FILTER DISCHARGE LINE
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and enter into contract. Motion seconded by Ald-
erman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF EXTENDING LEASE AGREEMENT FOR POLICE
CHIEF VEHICLE
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and enter into a two -year agreement. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
4
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
(j)
CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZING WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION
INSURANCE FOR POLICE RESERVISTS
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to
approve coverage. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and unanimously carried.
(k)
CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE CIVIL DEFENSE
EQUIPMENT
Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to ap-
prove the release. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar
and unanimously carried.
(1)
CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISPOSE OF EXCESS
PROPERTY IN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to approve disposal.
• (m)
CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN
PETROGRAPHIC SERVICES, INC. FOR CORING AND TESTING
SERVICES FOR SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER DAM, PROJECT 90 -20
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve
entering into agreement not to exceed $3,000. Motion
seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried.
(n)
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING EXISTING ORDINANCE RELATING
TO UTILITY SERVICE
Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap-
prove and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 90 -20
and set second reading for May 22, 1990. Motion sec-
onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried.
(o) CONSIDERATION OF TAX SPLIT FOR EXISTING TAX PARCEL,
SOUTH PORTION OF LOT 8, BLACK 21, TOWNSITE OF
HUTCHINSON
Attorney Anderson reported this property is listed on
the tax roll as one parcel. The owner requests Council
approval for a split and adoption of a Resolution to
that effect.
• 5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990 •
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Torgerson to approve the split and waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9258. Motion seconded by Alderman
Mlinar and unanimously carried.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz reported that bids for replacement
of sidearms in the Police Department were received yes-
terday. It was recommended to award the bid to Strei-
cher's Guns in the amount of $9,191.00 for 20 holsters,
20 double magazine holders and increase the 20 weapons
to 22 sidearms due to the low bid.
Alderman Mlinar moved to approve awarding the bid and
to purchase 22 weapons for the City. Motion seconded
by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by •
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to prepare
Resolution of Appreciation, No. 9259, to the V.F.W.
Post 906 of Hutchinson for $12,000 donation to the City
for the purchase of firearms.
Mr. Plotz commented on meetings held concerning the
employee pay plan and merit system. He requested
Council approval to continue with the present program
until 1991.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to authorize
continuation of existing system through calendar year
1990.
It was reported that in order to sell the hospital
bonds for equipment, the bonds would have to be made
bank qualified. Therefore, it would be necessary to
adopt Resolution No. 9256 which was prepared by the
bond consultant and bond attorney.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 9256.
0
•
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
Mr. Plotz stated that the owner of the Country Club
Terrace mobile home park wished to be on a future
Council agenda.
Administrator Plotz informed the Council that an
employee in the liquor store would be retiring July 1.
Therefore, they would need to decide whether to fill
the position with a part -time or full -time person.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CRAIG LENZ
Alderman Lenz commented on an article written by Ken
Gruenhagen which was in the Leader The City was ac-
cused of being negligent in helping the businesses on
Hwy. 7 East during highway construction; however,
Alderman Lenz felt the City had shown concern. Neither
the contractor nor MN /DOT want to take the responsibil-
ity for the access road.
• (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson stated the Licensing Bureau should
receive a letter of congratulations from the City Ad-
ministrator for its excellent review for 1989.
The City Administrator was directed to talk to John
Hornick regarding his proposed project.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney reported he was in contact with the
Shopko corporate offices in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The
estimates for the Phase II environmental testing work
was higher than expected. Therefore, Shopko would like
the City to share in the $35,000 - $45,000 cost, with a
cap of $20,000 by Shopko. The City will be eligible
for a 90 percent State reimbursment of its costs on
this work. Otherwise, everything else in the agreement
had been signed by Shopko.
Attorney Anderson stated he would be meeting with the
MPCA on Thursday.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
is
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 8, 1990
Engineer Rodeberg presented a status report on 1990
projects. He is working on future projects for Hwy. 7
through town, with five -lane design, street lights and
cuts. The project will be completed in four to five
years.
It was reported that fiber glass poles and new globes
would be installed along Hwy. 15 and Hwy. 7 East.
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and
authorize payment from the appropriate funds.
\J
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
10:07 P.M. •
•
C�
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, MAY 7, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator
Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Assistant Engineer Cal Rice and
Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 4108, Advertisement for Bids,
Letting No. 5, Project Nos. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, and
90 -18 were dispensed with. The following bids were opened and
read:
Duininck Bros., Inc.
Prinsburg, MN
$384,797.00
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. 409,022.70
Hamburg, MN
The bids were referred to the Director of Engineering for review
• and a recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 2:05 P.M.
C�'
MINUTES
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, MAY 15, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator
Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Finance Director Kenneth B. Mer-
rill, Maintenance Operations Supervisor Doug Meier, and Administra-
tive Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 4113, Advertisement for Bids, Pur-
chase of Front -End Wheel Loader, was dispensed with. The following
bids were opened and read:
1. Carlson's Lake State Equipment Co
Burnsville, MN
Total Price Bid - Model 544E
Less Trade -In
Net Price (with Guaranteed Maintenance)
Net Price (withiout Guaranteed Maintenance)
Case Power & Equipment
Shakopee, MN
Total Price Bid - Model 621
Less Trade -In
Net Price (with Guaranteed Maintenance)
Net Price (without Guaranteed Maintenance)
3. Ziegler, Inc.
Minneapolis. MN
Total Price Bid - Model 926E
Less Trade -In
Net Price (with Guaranteed Maintenance)
Net Price (without Guaranteed Maintenance)
$81,710.00
10.810.00
70,900.00
67,300.00
70,663.00
9.200.00
63,963.00
61,463.00
83,266.00
6.500.00
80,266.00
76,766.00
The bids were referred to City staff for review and a recommenda-
tion.
The meeting adjourned at 2:15 P.M.
0
F , I
L
4.
I
2,506.91
15,329.76
36,476.00
21,146.24
42.0%
APRIL
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FINANCIAL REPORT -
1990
APRIL
RNUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
APRIL
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
39.2%
MONTH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
15,930.83
1,518,179.00
1,502,248.17
1.0%
LICENSES
2,093.00
8,153.00
18,950.00
10,797.00
43.0%
PERMITS AND FEES
27,348.50
53,380.86
91,300.00
37,919.14
58.5%
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
50,398.47
98,964.46
1,476,380.00
1,377,415.54
C.7%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
555,348.33
127,987.61
532,699.00
404,711.39
24.0%
FINES & FORFEITS
5,096.06
12,653.25
45,500.00
32,846.75
27.8%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
20,014.17
53,525.83
122,600.00
69,074.17
43.7%
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
0.00
89,000.00
426,000.00
337,000.00
20.9%
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
400.92
432.18
250.00
(182.18)
172.9%
TOTAL
160,699.45
460,028.02
4,231,858.00
3,771,829.98
1019%
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
2,506.91
15,329.76
36,476.00
21,146.24
42.0%
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
13,788.44
56,845.51
154,200.00
97,354.49
36.9%
ELECTIONS
416.25
2,833,02
7,230.00
4,396.98
39.2%
FINANCE
26,494.41
119,550.37
237,955.00
118,404.63
50.2%
MOTOR VEHICLE
6,469.34
26,582.47
70,835.00
44,252.53
37.5%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
20,700.00
20,700.00
0.0%
LALL
3,140.50
12,156.50
41,000.00
28,843.50
29.7%
FWNING
320.50
1,269.02
7,800.00
6,530.98
16.3%
CITY HALL
3,199.32
13,645.46
43,021.00
29,375.54
31.7%
RECREATION BUILDING
3,085.73
14,369.82
58,382.00
44,012.18
24.6%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
98,629.62
363,456.36
914,916.00
551,459.64
39.7%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
3,820.95
28,504.15
109,560.00
81,055.85
26.0%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
317.18
5,072.12
25,213.00
20,140.88
20.1%
BUILDING INSPECTION
6,209.23
20,745.20
64,493.00
43,747.80
32.2%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
60.75
60.75
7,698.00
7,637.25
0.8%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.0%
FIRE MARSHALL
3,989.47
16,870.12
47,965.00
31,094.88
35.2%
ENGINEERING
18,098.29
78,675.21
234,057.00
155,381.79
33.6%
STREETS & ALLEYS
34,386.20
117,864.29
399,123.00
281,258.71
29.5%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
4,386.14
20,391.86
73,100.00
52,708.14
27.9%
LIBRARY
720.96
32,058.42
68,996.00
36,937.58
46.5%
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
10,849.63
26,056.80
81,291.00
55,234.20
32.1%
PARK /REC, ADMIN.
11,313.88
35,630.26
99,496.00
63,865.74
35.8%
RECREATION
11,120.08
33,234.70
159,947.00
126,712.30
20.8%
CIVIC ARENA
11,371.64
52,949.67
109,753.00
56,803.33
43.2%
PARK DEPARTMENT
41,766.31
123,982.24
428,262.00
304,279.76
29.0%
CEMETERY
3,260.05
12,474.27
51,708.00
39,233.73
24.1%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2,456.53
12,305.42
32,170.00
19,864.58
38.3%
CELEBRATE 1990 GRANT
456.30
456.30
0.00
(456.30)
ERR
DEBT SERVICE
1,500.00
6,000.00
53,287.00
47,287.00
11.3%
AIRPORT
3,203.68
159,891.02
53,387.00
(106,504.02)
299.5%
T$YSIT
11,285.85
37,475.15
129,784.00
92,308.85
28.9%
E Y COUNCIL
277.73
1,307.40
14,642.00
13,334.60
8.9%
S.C.D.P. COORDINATRO
37,409.56
82,900.12
33,589.00
(49,311.12)
0.0%
UNALLOCATED
27,995.75
62,114.30
361,570.00
299,455.70
17.2%
TOTAL 404,307.18 1,593,058.06 4,231,856.00 2,638,797.94 37.1%
e
APRIL
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1990
APRIL
•
ENTERPRISE ENTERPRISE FUNDS
REVENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
MONTH OF YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE PERCENTAGE
MAY
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
LIQUOR SALES
30,920.17
131,461.19
435,000.00
303,538.81
30.2%
WINE SALES
9,775.89
33,877.66
151,000.00
117,122.34
22.4%
BEER SALES
53,585.10
200,224.48
701,400.00
501,175.52
28.5%
BEER DEPOSITS
(843.43)
(1,173.32)
0.00
1,173.32
MISC. SALES
3,119.78
641.95
11,065.80
1,808.08
40,895.00
6,500.00
29,829.20
4,691.92
27.8%
INTEREST
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CASH DISCOUNTS
(53.17)
(196.55)
(2,100.00)
(1,903.45)
TOTAL
97,146.29
377,067.34
1,332,695.00
955,627.66
28.3%
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
12,669.77
50,248.59
140,959.00
90,710.41
35.6%
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
63.20
1,514.87
2,800.00
1,285.13
54.1%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1,577.95
4,519.78
37,200.00
32,680.22
12.1%
1.8%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
107.59
6,000.00
0.00
5,892.41
(208.00)
0.0%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00_ 208.00
0.00 0.00
110,000.00
110,000.00
0.0%
TRANSFERS
OST OF SALES,
135,215.99
272,490.76
1 0
7
2
0.00
(3,200.00)
(3,200.00)
OTHER OTHER
TOTAL
149,526.91
329,089.59
1,311,159.00
982,069.41
25.1%
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
WATER SALES
33,738.91
154,649.99
516,400.00
361,750.01
29.9%
WATER METER SALES
505.00
885.00
6,500.00
5,615.00
13.6%
REFUSE SERVICES
30,260.46
143,126.19
441,203.00
298,076.81
32.4%
REFUSE SURCHARGE
2,780.69
6,649.62
0.00
(6,649.62)
SEWER SERVICES
109,420.01
498,586.84
1,388,400.00
889,813.16
35.9%
PENALTY CHARGES
1,142.18
5,297.74
11,000.00
5,702.26
0.0%
INTEREST EARNED
14,120.54
18,821.96
160,000.00
141,178.04
11.8%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
425.62
8,000.00
7,574.38
0.0%
OTHER
75.00
7,569.75
2,000.00
(5,569.75)
378.5%
TOTAL
192,042.79
836,012.71
2,533,503.00
1,697,490.29
33.0%
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
• REFUSE
WATER
SEWER
WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT,
124,938.90 452,300.00 327,361.10
172,401.92 1,019,479.00 847,077.08
184,138.09 1,658,117.00 1,473,978.91
1,989.84 0.00 (1,989.84)
27.6%
16.9%
11.1%
TOTAL 0.00 483,468.75 3,129,896.00 2,646,427.25 15.4%
• APRIL
REVENUE REPORT
MEMBERSHIPS
ADMISSIONS
VIDEO GAMES
POP
CANDY
CHIPS, ETC.
INTEREST
BLDG RENTS
FUND RAISERS
CONTRIBUTIONS
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
PERSONEL SERVICES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
MISCELLANEOUS
• CAPITAL OUTLAY
TOTAL
YOUTHCTR
23 DATES
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1990
APRIL
ENTERPRISE
YOUTH CENTER
CURRENT
YEAR TO
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
MONTH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
20.00
230.00
2,000.00
1,770.00
11.5%
454.00
2,357.00
7,200.00
4,843.00
3_'.7%
800.00
800.00
0.0%
128.46
692.G9
3,600.00
2,907.31
1 %.2%
62.62
350.22
3,600.00
3,249.78
9.7%
338.25
948.77
1,200.00
251.23
79.1%
(1.00)
112.24
1,000.00
887.76
11.2%
0.00
0.00
0.00
500.00
7,500.00
48,000.00
40,500.00
15.6%
1,502.33
12,295.92
67,400.00
55,104.08
18.2%
2,182.83
383.89
3,145.36
0.00
0.00
5,712.08
9,084.69
1,047.88
13,221.06
160.57
591.60
24,105.80
27,803.00
6,800.00
33,300.00
1,500.00
69,403.00
18,718.31
5,752.12
20,078.94
1,339.43
(591.60)
45,297.20
32.7%
15.4%
39.7%
10.7%
MONTH OF ATTENDANCE
APRIL Y.T.D
759 3,937
34.7%
U
nl)af ---- J__I.
L ,
•
•
4 u.s . psvAer
C-404
a
7
"I w rw s
ll Parmly MauaA
i
(F1,ese CMKf e^Y error irr ireir,e erq edp REPORT
OF BUILDING OR
55e
ZONING PERMITS ISSUED
AND LOCAL PUBLIC
CONSTRUCTION
T7'S0� 27
R 9g77 78e
Elod
25 9770 32733
JAPES MARK% BL)F OFFICIAL
II our buildi
V has changed.
o p i a te o x Belo
mark IXI appropnate box pelow antl sap/aln
In com ments.
CIfY HALL 37 Y45X IV 6TJV AYE PEST
L Discontinued rued
NUTCHINSOV �
4 N 5 5 7 5 ..
issuing Darmits
Merged with another system
Split into two or more systems
Annexed land areas
ETE AND MAIL l
1
E Had o[hm changes
OR BEFORE
If no permits were issued during
this period. mark (X) in the box ❑
Bureau of the Census
1201 East
L 70
Instructions ere included For
and return this form
Tenth Street
Jeff •rsomille, IN 47132
further assistance, call collect
43011763-7244.
NEW HESIDENTIAL
HOUSEKEEPING
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLYOWNED
BUILDINGS
Item Number of
No Valuation of
Number of
Valuation of
Mo construction
Budings usin
uniu Omii cents
Buildings Housing construct.,.
eel to) Icl to)
units Omit cants
W III lot
Single- family houses, detached
Exclude mobile names.
101
4
4
474,316
$inBlefamily houses, attached
- Separated by ground to too( wall,
-NO units above or below, and
- SeDaren he systems end utility maters.
ICount each unit ass separate building)
102
2
2
154,284
Two - family builtlings
103
Three - and four family buildings
104
Five -or -more family buildings
108
TO of 101- 105 0
109
6
6
628,600
NEW RESIDENTIAL
NONHOUSEKEEPING
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBIICLYOWNEO
BUILDINGS
Item
No
Number
of
Valuation of
Number
of
Valuation of
Buildings
Rooms
constmc
Omi! csnn tio^
Buildings
Rooms
construction
Ormt
(e1
(b If
Ice
(dl
eel
111
cents
IBI
Hotels, motels, and tourist cabins
(transient accommodations only)
213
Other nonhousekeeping shelter
214
NEW
NONRESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLYOWNED
BUILDINGS Item
No.
Number
Valuation of
Number
Valuation of
of
buildings
construction
Omit csnn
of
buildings
construction
Omit cents
Amusement, social, and recreational
(aI
318
(bl
(c)
(d)
lal
Churches and other halt ious
319
Industrial
320
Parkin are as (buildln s and open docked)
321
Service stations and repair garages
322
Hospitals and institutional
223
Offices, banks, and professional
324
1
Public works and utilities
328
znd
Stores and customer services
327
1
47,000
Other nonresidential buildings 1 3281
3
2,118
Structures oUer than buildings 329
ADDITIONS,
ALTERATIONS, AND
PRIVATELYOIVNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
CONVERSIONS Item
No.
Number
Valuation of
Number
Y41WNOn of
of
buildhgs
canatrection
Omit csnn
of
buildings
construction
Omit csnn
(sl
(bl
It)
Idl
eel
Reswcenba'. Classey additions of
garages and carports in item 438. 434
13
56,166
Nonresidential and nonhousekeeping 437
l
J2. 700
Additions of residential garages and carports
(attached and detached) 4381
2
10 500
RERMF - 7 aFcnrr - e
EXCAVATION - 1 CURB CUT 6 -APRON -r1 44 PERMITS - $778,384.00 VALUATION REVERSE SIDE �►
'1/ -a, (-2-)
DE MOLITIONS AND
PNIVATEIY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
RAZING OF
BUILDINGS
Item
Numbw al
Number of
Na.
Building, Housing
Buildin s Housing
units
g unit
1.)
Ibl lei
till lei
7
hooses fanachedanddetached!
646
ui ldings
646
ur family buildings
647
family buildings
648
rnas and structures 649 1
INDIVIDUAL PERMITS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION VALUED AT 6600,000 OR MORE
Please provide the following information for each permit authorizing construction valued at $500.000 or more
entered in sections I through IV.
Item
No
Owner-
Number al
—
from
Description
Name and address of
s
Valuation of
sec
owner or builder
Mar4 IX)
n
c rt
Nousiog I Bvild.ngs
I — N
one
Om cents
v " a
ei
pl
Itll
lei
In fgl
Kind of pmldmg
____________
OPUVne
Sne address
OPublic
S
Kind of pwldinp
OPrivale
Sne address
- - - - -- ---------------------------
❑Public
6
Kind of Wadmp
_____________________ __ _______
Site address
i t
Kind o r buud,rq
________________________
-Size __
____ __________ ___ _______ ___ __ ______
OPrivsre
ad_d_ r_ es_s
6
Kvb PI building
_____ __sa _________________________
_____ ________________
Print
Site add,
__ ___________________
Politic
KDM of Du�ldng
____ _______________________________
❑ Privae
Site sdaroaa
____ _______________________________
PaDYc
8
KvM of Duildaip
_____
____ _______________________________
Private
bib addma __________
5
7 ;w .f puilreng
_________________________ __________
EJPjv.t.
Sib adrpau
PuD4c
f
Kind o I building
___
____ _______________________________
Privets
___________________
Site adanv
___________________
6
Comment
Are You aware of any new Permit- luuing
f] No ❑ Yes
juriadictiomT — Please give additionaf information in comments.
Name of person to contact regarding this report
7ANES G. HARKA
7eleDhone
Title
Arse code
Number
Enens�on
BUILDING OFFICIAL
612
587 -5151
210
ruaM c ew ies am
0
•
•
• MINUTES
HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
Monday, April 30, 1990
Members present: Dennis Kahl, Dave Skaar, Doug McGraw, Mark Lopac
Lights have been repaired.
TKDA firm has been approved by state for preliminary airport expansion.
Bills, key and past dues on aviation fuel will be addressed next meeting.
Policy will be required.
Maintenance: Keep Off Grass - stakes are too close to edge
Touch up paint around telephone
Next meeting will not be held on Memorial Day, May 28. No other time
designated.
Meeting adjourned.
• Submitted by,
Mark Lopac
is
4 -� ( 3)
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
is Tuesday, April 17, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint
Gruett, E1Roy Dobratz, Larry Romo, Craig Lenz, Tom Lyke (7:50 p.m.)
and Chairman Craig. Also Present: City Administrator Gary Plotz,
Building official Jim Marka and City Engineer John Rodeberg.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Dobratz made a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting dated Tuesday, March 20, 1990. Seconded by Mr.
Gruett the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY 3M CO. FOR SOLVENT RECOVERY SYSTEM IN
FLOODWAY AND CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY 3M CO. FOR TANK FARM IN FLOODWAY.
• Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. that was
published as #4076 and 4077 in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, January 4, 1990. The request is for the
purpose of considering a conditional use permit to allow
3M Company, to construct a solvent recovery system within
the 100 year Floodway Boundary of the south fork of the
Crow River, and to construct a solvent Tank Farm with
secondary containment diking for the storage of solvent,
within the 100 year boundary of the south fork of the
Crow River.
Mr. Pat McGrann, 3M, St. Paul, and Mr. Frank Mott, 3M
Hutchinson, presented a map and plan explaining the
process and comments from the DNR. Mr. McGrann commented
on a joint FEMA study from the Corps of Engineers, DNR
and City. The analysis and studies are all concluded.
City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on an upcomming
meeting with the Corps of Engineers.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Lenz the hearing closed at 7:40 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a
motion to recommend approval provided there is proper
approval from the DNR, FEMA and the City. Seconded by
Mr. Lenz the motion carried. Mr. Dobratz and Mr. Gruett
• abstained from voting as employees of 3M.
1
�/ - 1� 1 (4)
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/17/90
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY NORM
PONSFORD TO MOVE A MANUFACTURED HOME
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:45 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4104 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 5, 1990. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional
use permit to allow the owner to move a 24' x 48'
manufactured home unto property located at 420 School Rd.
Mr. Norm Ponsford, owner of the home, commented on the
proposal. Building Official Marka commented on the new
criteria for manufactured homes that are to be met in the
event of alterations to the home according to Uniform
Building Codes not HUD standards. Discussion followed
on the conformance of the home.
Mr. Ponsford stated there is a 2x6 floor joist that would
allow the home to be placed on a foundation and commented
on the regulations being changed on 11- 20 -89. He stated
he will change the color and trim and do extensive
cosmetic work to blend into neighborhood. Also, he will
be changing the furnace.
Mr. Jim Waldren, neighboring property owner, questioned •
the differance between manufactured homes and mobile
homes. Mr. Ponsford explained that manufactured homes
may be placed either in a mobile home park or on a lot.
City Attorney Anderson explained that Statute #357 states
that the city cannot discriminate against manufactured
housing that complies with the criteria.
Building Official Marka commented on the two differing
standards of Uniform Building Codes and HUD. The State
requires both standards are met. The UBC is more
restrictive.
Discussion followed on the legality of placing
manufactured homes on city lots. Building Official Marka
commented on the codes and how to enforce them.
Mr. Lenz moved to continue the hearing to Monday, April
30, 1990, at 5:30 p.m., seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion
carried unanimously.
2 •
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/17/90
• (c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY DAVE KLOPP TO
REDUCE A 6' SETBACK FOR GARAGE ADDITION
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:05 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4105 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 5, 1990. The request
is for the purpose of considering a variance by the owner
to allow him to reduce the 6' setback from alley line for
a garage addition located at 425 - 3rd Ave SE.
Mr. Dave Klopp, 425 - 3rd Ave SE, commented on his
proposal in order to use the garage. He stated the roof
line will remain the same and he will reshingle the
building.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Ebent the hearing closed at 8:10 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a
motion to approve the variance, seconded by Mr. Ebent the
motion carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DAVE
KLOPP
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:11 p.m. with the
. reading of publication #4106 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 5, 1990. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional
use permit by the owner to construct an addition onto a
nonconforming garage located at 425 -3rd Ave SE.
Mr. Chuck Brill, neighboring property owner, questioned
if the addition was only an extension.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing seconded by Mr.
Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:12 p.m. Mr. Ebent made
a motion to recommend approval of the conditional use
permit, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried
unanimously.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) PRESENTATION OF SHORELAND ORDINANCE BY SKIP WRIGHT
Skip Wright, DNR Hydrologist, explained the procedure to
update the ordinance and the cost. Director of
Engineering John Rodeberg commented on the setbacks for
I
akes vs. rivers and Campbell and Otter Lakes.
is 3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/17/90 •
Mr. Wright stated that shoreland area is defined as
district. The new ordinance has five river
classifications. Mr. Rodeberg explained the 1000' is not
a setback but the zone that is to meet standards.
Discussion followed on the present lots along the lake.
The new ordinance would most effect new developments.
Mr. Wright explained the new ordinance in oriented to
Comprehensive Shoreland management, Pollution management,
Wetland management, etc.
Building Official Marka stated the ordinance should
include information that affects Hutchinson and staff
needs to address what is pertinent to the City. Mr.
Wright commented there are general development lakes in
this area and the river is considered urban. He stated
the ordinance is attempting to preserve the natural
character of the area and keep water clean.
Discussion followed on agriculture usage near lakes and
runoff that will affect the water quality in any area.
There was discussion on the county standards and the
coordination between city and county to maintain the
standards. There will be changes to the present county
ordinance.
Building Official Marka commented on the seminar he •
attended, stating any permits issued on Delaware Street
would need recertification of the septic systems.
Staff will compile the ordinance within the next two
years.
(b) PRESENTATION OF RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO
CONNECTION OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES PRESENTED BY JOHN
RODEBERG
Director of Engineering John Rodeberg commented on the
water and sewer service connection charges. The basic
proposal is to obtain money for a special assessment fund
to pick up costs that otherwise the city will concur. He
explained the most fair manner of assessing the lots.
City Administrator Plotz explained deferred assessments
outside city limits and activating the assessments
through a notice given the property owners. Mr. Rodeberg
explained the appeal process.
Mr. Ebent recommended the Planning Commission send the
ordinance on to the City Council for adoption to the
Municipal Codes, seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried
4
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
• 4/17/90
unanimously.
(c) DISCUSSION OF SKETCH PLAN PRESENTED BY ROBERT MILEY
Mr. Robert Miley, 515 Lakewood Dr., commented on the lot
12 -B and that his house is on lot 13. Building Official
Marka explained the unusual lot split and commented on
the concern for storm sewer run off. He also would like
to see the proposed land use at the time of platting.
Discussion followed on the sketch plan as proposed. Mr.
Miley commented on possibly constructing a garage on the
lot.
Building Official Marka stated that at present 12 -B is a
buildable lot. The property owner cannot put an
accessory building alone on a buildable lot.
City Engineer Rodeberg commented that the surface water
drainage on the lot will have to be overland flow. The
developer cannot block drainage with a building.
The consensus of the Planning Commission would be
favorable to platting the lots.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF BACHMAN'S 1ST ADDITION (2
MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Lenz moved to recommend approval of the final plat,
seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(e) DISCUSSION OF TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT PRESENTED BY CITY
ADMINISTRATOR GARY PLOTZ
City Administrator Gary Plotz summarized the tax
increment financing in regard to the ShopKo project.
(f) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
1) Mr. Marks commented on a request by the Hutch
Ambassadors to place permanent signs at the
entrances to the City.
Mr. Don Erickson commented on the present Welcome
to Hutchinson signs and over the years the
ambassadors decided they would like a more
maintenance free sign. This would possibly be a 5
• year project. There would be one sign put up each
5
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
4/17/90 •
year and the sign would be of very good quality.
The Planning Commission had favorable
recommendation to the Council for the signs.
2) Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of 2
temporary signs requested by Mr. Jerry Brown of
Brown's Floral, seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion
carried unanimously.
5. ADJOURMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
9:50 p.m.
E
6 •
BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME
Minutes - April - 1990
The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home
• met Thursday, April 26, 1990. Chairman James Mills called the meeting
to order at 4:00 p.m.
Members present: Jim Mills Don Erickson Roger Gilmer
Marge Putney Elaine Black
Ancher Nelsen Robert Koepcke
Members absent: Kay Peterson
Press: Jenny Ingebrigtsen, KDUZ news
Robin Schoen, Hutchinson Leader
Guests: Linda Nelsen, Good Neighbor
James Seifert, Charles Bailly
Laurie Pearson, Good Neighbor
Don Schwartzendruber, Colonial Life
Jan Luthens, Burns Manor
MINUTES REVIEW
Minutes of the March 12, 1990 meeting were reviewed. Motion by
Don Erickson to accept the minutes. All in favor. Motion carried.
TAX - SHELTERED INSURANCE PROPOSAL
Don Schwartzendruber of Colonial Life presented a "Section 125"
tax - sheltered program whereby full -time employees may elect to have
insurance premiums deducted from their paychecks before taxes. He
S also described a supplemental health /disability plan whose employee -
paid premiums would also enjoy "pre -tax" deductions. While the
Board generally approved of the program, Roger Gilmer asked if he could
research tax code trends to assure the future viability of "Section
125" programs. Motion by Ancher Nelsen and.Don Erickson to table this
matter until Roger's report at the May meeting. All in favor. Motion
carried.
FINANCIAL REPORT AND CAPITAL BILLS
James Seifert of the Charles Bailly accounting firm presented
the comparative, 1989/1988 audited financial statement as previously
distributed. He noted generally positive trends, encouraging the
continuing effort to reduce accounts receivable.
The March, 1990 financial report was also reviewed. The neutral
revenue /expense balance is better than expected, noting that $13,000
in Medicare revenues are understood to be pending the outcome of next
years's cost report.
Don Erickson asked clarifying questions of the budget regarding
• ancillary revenues, bond interest and depreciation expenses. Robert
Koepcke listed remodeling and equipment bills submitted since March 12:
April Minutes
Page 2
A & B Electric ... $4,435.17
Allen Office Products...$6,205.00 •
Abestos Control Management ... $2,048.94
Design Dimensions ... $2,395.00
Erickson Ellison Engineers ... $2,683.55
Institutional Products Corp ... $1,825.70
Lundeen Floor Covering ... $10,778.97
Maki Painting and Decorating ... $6,265.00
TEK Mechanical ... $12,953.73
Motion made by Don Erickson and Elaine Black to accept the financial
reports and capital bills. All in favor. Motion carried.
REMODELING SPECIFICATIONS
Laurie Pearson presented plans and specifications for facility
remodeling in order to make maximum use of available bond and
memorial funds. She noted that these plans are in concert with future
construction so that areas renewed now will not be disturbed later.
Also, that the existing generator must be disconnected since extra
casts would be incurred to make it compatible with new lighting
loads. Current regulations do not require a generator as long as the
existing battery - powered hall lights remain in place. There will be
bid alternates for flooring, wallcovering and fire - sprinkling as funds
allow.
If bids are advertised by May 10 and reviewed on May 31, work may
begin in June and completed within 4 months. Motion made by Elaine
Black and Roger Gilmer to approve the plans and specifications for
presentation to the city Council on May 8. All in favor. Motion
carried.
MANAGER'S VACATION POLICY
Discussion, as per previous meeting, was resumed. Robert Koepcke
presented a plan with rationale that such reflects the "flexible"
demands placed on salaried managers; that higher limits act as an
incentive for managers to become more efficient, since the Administrator
must approve each vacation request based on a department's current
"needs ". Don Erickson noted comparisons with other City employees,
asking for similarity between the City and other health care organizations
(notably Hutchinson Hospital and Good Neighbor), which have lower and
higher standards, respectively. Motion made by Roger Gilmer and Elaine
Black to establish:
April Minutes
Page 3
- 2 weeks during 1st year of service
• - 3 weeks after 4th year of service
- 4 weeks after 7th year of service
for existing managers before August, 1989 or those newly hired with
no previous experience. Also, that for newly -hired managers with
previous management experience, the Administrator may negotiate
vacation levels not to exceed 4 weeks per year. Finally, Robert
Koepcke and Jan Luthens are allowed 3 weeks per year, per their
previous employers. All in favor. Motion carried.
NURSING REORGA NIZATION PLANS
Jan Luthens and Linda Nelsen discussed a proposal to reorganize
the nursing department. Such has goals to improve staff performance
through: decentralized authority and responsibility, clear standards
for priority of duties and promotional opportunitigs at all levels of
practice. The implementing costs to Good Neighbor will be offset by
savings of not hiring currently vacant positions and lower turnover of
existing staff. A motion was made by Don Erickson and Elaine Black
to approve the plan as proposed. All in favor. Motion carried.
CORRESPONDENCE AND SCHEDULE
James Mills noted a recent correspondence from Doris Johnson that
complemented staff for good care of her mother.
Agreed by consensus that the next meeting will be held on Thursday,
May 24 at 12:00 noon in the multi - purpose room. Alternate meeting
schedules for summer meetings will be discussed on a month -to -month
basis.
Consensus agreed to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
ATTEST:
ames Mills, Chairman
Respectfully submitted by,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - April 11, 1990
Large Conference Room - 5:15 p.m.
Present: Bob Durfee, President; Dori Johnson, Vice President; Rich Myers,
Trustee; Rev. Thor Skeie, Trustee; Marlin Torgerson, Trustee;
Dr. Dean Nissen, Chief of Staff
Absent: Diane Gilmer, Secretary
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator; Frank Seivert, Director of
Finance; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Gib Lehman,
Director of Plant Operations; Robyn Erickson, Director of
Marketing; Peter Worthington, M.A. Mortenson; Bernie Hesse,
McGladrey Pullen; Linda Ziemer, Personnel Director; Dennis Van
Norman, Van Norman 8 Associates; Cathy Nevanen, Hutchinson Leader;
Joni Engebretson, KDUZ Radio; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary
Prior to the meeting, three presentations were given.
Peter Worthington, construction manager from M.A. Mortenson, presented an
update on the expansion and remodeling project. He discussed contents of
the Construction Management monthly report with the Board and noted that the
design estimate is the next major portion of the project.
The preliminary project schedule was shown. Worthington informed the Board
that a trailer would be placed on -site within the next week or so, and his
firm would be dealing with all the bidding here (in Hutchinson).
The Board thanked Worthington for his report, and he then left the meeting.
Bernie Hesse, representing the Hospital's auditing firm, presented the
financial statements from the recently - completed Hospital and Medical Office
Building audit for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1989. He outlined
the auditor's responsibilities to the Hospital and issued a favorable
opinion of the financial statements.
He also presented his annual forecast of trends:
A. Increased attention will be paid to patient acuity - -HCH already is
implementing a new system from Abbott Northwestern that is also in
use at Methodist Hospital;
B. Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGsy will be expanded in number from
400 -some to 800 to more closely identify with services performed;
C. HMOs and PPOs have peaked in Minnesota, although they are growing
in other areas, such as Detroit;
D. Inpatient admissions will increase at only a modest rate
nationally;
E. Length of stay will increase slightly;
Ll - d 1 -6 ( 1 �
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/17/90 •
Page Two
F. Between 80 -100 hospitals will be closed per year;
G. Hospital mergers will increase;
H. Physicians will be paid for relative value of services provided;
I. Pressure from third -party payors will increase;
J. Patients will pay a larger portion of health care costs;
K. Hospitals will continue to become more specialized in the metro
areas; and
L. Utilization review by third -party payors will increase.
He complimented the Board for their foresight and stated the community is
fortunate that this board realizes the Hospital's need to be growing. The
Board thanked Hesse for his presentation, and he left the meeting.
Next, Ziemer and Van Norman spoke with the Board about the need to change
the employee health insurance plan. Ziemer gave a history of premium plans
from 1984 -1989 for single and family coverages. In 1989 alone, premiums
rose by 60%.
Van Norman compared HCH's premiums to those of Abbott Northwestern,
HealthOne, Health East, Waconia, Glencoe and Cambridge hospitals. At this
time, only one metro and one rural hospital has employees contributing to
their single coverage; the other hospitals pay their employees' single
coverage costs. For family coverage, employees already pick up family •
portion in all hospitals compared. He stated that if HCH doesn't make any
changes, the Hospital will be paying close to f.5 million for premiums. The
Hospital is already picking up 25% of the increase over what HCH paid last
year. The proposed changes will have employees picking up a more equitable
percentage themselves, just as the Hospital has done.
Proposed options, to be effective June 1, 1990, include the following:
A: Change benefits to $100 deductible, 80/20 coverage up to first
$2,000 (similar coverage to what the City employees now have);
B: $0 deductible (current plan); or
C: Waive Coverage - employees waiving coverage who can provide
evidence of current coverage elsewhere would be paid a 830
incentive per month to drop HCH health coverage.
The meeting was officially called to order by President Durfee at 7:50 p.m.
Minutes of Past Meetings Minutes of the March 15, 1990, regular meeting
were presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Myers, to approve the minutes of
the regular March 15, 1990, Board meeting as presented.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes Minutes of the regular and committee
" meetings of the medical staff were presented by Nissen. No unusual comments •
were made.
42�
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/17/90
Page Three
Old Business
A. Building Project Update An update was given by Worthington prior to
the meeting. (See above.)
New Business
A. Medical Staff Applications Applications for privileges were presented
and reviewed. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Johnson, to grant the
following privileges:
Consulting Staff Dr. John Bergseng, Surgery; Dr. John
Shirriff, Psychiatry; and Dr. Glenn
Lewis, Psychiatry;
Emergency Room Dr. Howard Hughes; Dr. William Jacobsen;
Dr. David N. Neinhus; and Or. Paul
Swanson.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
B. First Ouarter Status Report The first quarter status report on
progress toward achieving institutional objectives was presented and
reviewed. The report was received as information.
C. Telephone System Change The Board was informed that, effective April
14, 1990, the Hospital began using an automatic attendant system to
help process the large volume of phone calls received daily.
D. Health Insurance Plan Changes The Board was informed of proposed
changes to the employee health insurance plan prior to the meeting.
(See above.)
E. Audit Approval The Board considered the audit presentation prior to
the meeting. Following discussion:
Notion was made by Johnson, seconded by Skeie, to accept the audit
of the fiscal year ending December 31, 1989, as presented. All
were in favor. Motion carried.
F. Education Conferences The board was informed of upcoming education
conferences available to hospital trustees, including the Minnesota
Trustee Forum (July 13 -15) and the Estes Park conference (October 28-
November 1).
/3�
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/17/90 •
Page Four
Accounts Payable The accounts payable were presented for consideration.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Skeie, to approve for payment the
attached listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements in the
amount of $1,289,154.32. All were in favor. Motion carried.
Statistical Report and Financial Statements The statistical report for
March, 1990, was presented. Census days and admissions were up when
compared to the previous month. Average daily census and average length of
stay also increased. Utilization continued to be very strong and shows
positive variances from both the previous month and one year ago.
The financial statements showed total operating revenues for the month were
$1,021,000, or $8,000 greater than budget. Operating expenses were $1 -
million ($55,000 more than anticipated). Operating income was $20,550, or
$47,000 less than anticipated. Subtracting price level depreciation and
working capital requirements of $40,000 left the Hospital with excess
expense over revenues of approximately $20,000.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes Minutes of the February and March Auxiliary
C meeting minutes were presented. No unusual comments were made. •
Other.
1. Aooreciation for Bond Issue Efforts Durfee thanked Robyn
Erickson, on behalf of the Hospital Board, for her many efforts in
informing the public about the bond issue. He also expressed his
appreciation to Cathy Nevanen for newspaper articles explaining
the need for the building and expansion project.
1. LifeSpan Board Meeting Recap Myers presented information on the
April LifeSpan Board meeting. Their agenda included discussion of
bylaws changes to meet new federal regulations governing 501(0)3
organizations. Graves's report to the LifeSpan Board on the HCH
building project was well received. He noted that Cambridge's
hospital is also planning an expansion project. He encouraged all
trustees to attend the LifeSpan Annual Meeting taking place on
April 27.
3. CEO Evaluation Ourfee informed the Board that Skeie and Gilmer
are working with LifeSpan staff to redo the CEO's performance
evaluation system and would be presenting this at next month's
board meeting.
(0)
Regular Board of Directors Meeting - 4/17/90
Page Five
Other (continued)
4. President's Resignation Durfee regretfully informed the Board of
his decision to resign from his position on the board, effective
following his transfer to the St. Paul 3M Corporate office
sometime in May. His plans are to remain on the Board until a
replacement is appointed, but he requested that he be permitted to
step down as President at this time. Hospital staff were
requested to research officer ascension and report back at the
next meeting.
Ad.iournment Motion was made by Skeie to adjourn. The meeting was
adjourned at p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
LaAe Hulkonen Diane Gilmer
Executive Secretary Secretary
LH
46
'r)
NUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
Income Statement for Months Ended April 30, 1990 and 1989
MONTHLY ANALYSIS
CURRENT NONTH - ACTUAL TO BUDGET
CURRENT NONTN - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
April 90
%of
April 90
%of
Increase
Percent
REVENUE L EXPENSE
.................
Actual
...................................
Total
Budget
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
TOTAL REVENUE
1,123,729
100.00%
1,205,426
...............................
100.00%
(81,697)
-6.78%
Policy Discounts and Tree Care
(11,771)
-1.05%
(11,740)
-0.97%
(31)
0.26%
Governmental Discounts
(222,451)
............
- 19.80%
(199,830)
- 16.58%
(22,621)
11.32%
NET OPERATING REVENUE
869 ,507
............
............
79.16%
993,856
.....................
82.452
(104,349)
- 10.50%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
............
.....................
Satarfes
"7,677
39.84%
464,627
3834%
(16,950)
-3.65%
Benefits
115,548
10.28X
102."9
8.Sn
12,899
1237%
Supplies and other expenses
294,924
26.25%
326,451
27.06%
(31,527)
-9.66%
Depreciation
29,907
2.662 .
40,245
3.34%
(10,338)
- 25.69%
Interest
3,292
------------
0.29%
11,503
0.95%
(8,211)
- 71.38%
Total Operating Expense
891,348
............
............
79.32%
945,475
.....................
78.43%
(54,127)
-5.72%
OPERATING MARGIN
(1,841)
............
-0.16X
48,381
...................
4.01%
(50,222)
..
- 103.81%
TOTAL 07MER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
15,261
............
1.36%
26,039
2.16%
(10,778)
- 41.39%
MET INCOME (LOSS)
13,420
............
1.19%
74,420
.....................
6.17%
(61,000)
- 61.97%
momm
iYi®iiY
iYiYYiiiYYYtNi
CURRENT NONTN - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
0
•
F 1
L -A
April 90
%of
April 89
%of
Increase
Percent
REVENUE L EXPENSE
---------- - - - - - --
Actual
.--......................---.--....
Total
Aetusl
Total
(Decrease)
Varfanco
TOTAL REVENUE
1,123,729
100.00%
1,064,020
..............---
100.002
..............
38.909
3.59%
Policy Discounts and free care
(11,771)
-1.05%
(9,066)
-0.84%
(2,703)
29.81%
Ooveneental Discounts
(222,451)
............
-man
(113,226)
-10."X
(109,225)
96.47%
MET OPERATING REVENUE
a 69,307
............
-----
79.16%
- - - - --
962,526
.....................
611.73%
(73,019)
-7.59%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
............
.....................
Salaries
"7,677
39.34%
408.969
37.70.5
3111,666
9.4"
Benefits
115,546
10.2x%
82,202
7.56%
33,346
40.57%
Supplies and other expanses
294. 924
26.252
2",753
24.41%
30,171
11.40%
Depreciation
29,907
2.66%
29,573
2.73%
334
1.132
interest
3.292
--- ----- °--
0.294
1,209
0.11%
2.063
172.29%
Total Operating Expose
891 ,348
............
............
79.322
786,726
..
72.52%
...................
104,622
13.30%
OPERATING MARGIN
(1,841)
............
-0.1"
175,800
...................
16.21%
(177,"1)
..
- 101.05%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
15,261
............
1.36%
............
24,020
2.21%
(6,759)
- 36.47%
MET INCOME (LOU)
13,420
1.192
199,820
.....................
19.421
(186,400)
- 93.2811
i ®YiiYi
ii
YYiYYiYY YiiiY
0
•
F 1
L -A
SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD METPINGs
April 18, 1990
• Members present, Mildred Jensen, Marie Kaping, Verna Hintz and Ruby Krueger
Members absents Reuben Holman, Lloyd Mueller and Elsa Young
Staff presents Lucille Arlt
ac- officio members presents Arnold Rotzien and Don Bonniwell
Chairman Mildred Jensen called the meeting to order. The minutes of the last
meeting were read and approved. Arnold Rotzien reported there is $958.64 in the
checking account and $184.70 was realized from the food sale.
It was announced Mildred Jensen is to be the chairman replacing Rotzien whose term
had expired. New board member Ruby Krueger was introduced. The other new board
member, Reuben Holman, was unable to attend the meeting. It was also noted Don
Bonniwell's term had expired and he has been replaced.
Old business
Kitchen equipments Committee members Marie Kaping, Mildred Jensen and Ruby Krueger
will purchase necessary kitchen equipment.
Notebooks The notebooks have been received and are in use. Rotzien assembled
• old minutes for board members. There is one extra notebooks.
Food sales As reported above, $184.70 was received. A discussion was held as
to holding the next food sale in some other public place.
New business_
Money Raisere s
1. picnic supper - To be held Monday, June 25 from 4,00 to 7,00 p.m. at the
Senior Center. The menu will be potato salad, barbeques, pickles and cake
(Advisory Board to furnish cakes). Tickets will be $3.25 at the door and
$3.00 In advance. Ruby Krueger will make posters and Rotzien will serve
as chairman. I
2. Band concert - We are still waiting to hear about this.
3. Civic Center concession stand - Senior volunteers have been asked to
work at the concession stand during the Cole Circus, the Flea Market and
the Baseball Card Show.
Old card tabless This matter will be discussed at the next meeting.
An update on trips and activities was given.
Marie Kaping made a motion to adjourn and Esther Krueger seconded. Meeting
• adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Lucille Arlt, Secretary pro -tem
0
THE HUTCH HUSKIES AMATEUR BASEBALL ASSOCIATION IS
i s
•
REQUESTING THAT THE COUNCIL PLEASE WAIVE THE FEE FOR SELLING
3.2 BEER AT VETERANS MEMORIAL FIELD FOR THE 1990 BASEBALL
SEASON. THIS WOULD BE A PERIOD OF TIME FROM ABOUT MAY 20 TO
SEPTEMBER 1, 1990. THANK -YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.
BOARD MEMBER: LEE COX
e 4 04 1
,3•
1WIN }� },IM NY}
RETAIL "ON SALE"
Male Of IM1111cota,
CUC_t'Tl' OF ...._McLeod } City Butch inson
................ ..... .
To the City Council Cit Hutchinson
_ _..... of the y _ .......................... of....__ ...............................
.._ ... ... .......... ................ .__.. Stale of Minnesota:
.........._.. Hutch Iluskies Amateur Baseball Association
_ .. ........ . ......_.. .. ..I ...... _ ............... ......_.
...._. _....__ _.._.._...
herrha al-PI __fur a limn., for the term of..... __.. .. .... �L..C.? hIQ1:v.........._.
/ any the _.... ._........_...
r -� 3 rci ._ .............day of....._ / ........._.. _.. __..____, ly _[L?.., to "It
At Retail Only, Non•Intoxicatutg Malt Liquors,
as the sane are defined by Zau•, for consumption "UN" those certain premises in the ... ........._. ....... .............
.....City. f Hutclu nson
_....
described as foZlou:v, Lo-wit: ..__ ___....__ ..............._....._......__........... ............................._.
Concession Stand
Veteran's Memorial Park
at which place said applicant..... operat6.....the bueinew of. .......... Concessian.. Stand ......._.._ ................
.. _. ........ ..... ........
... ..._..... _ ................. ......... ...._ ... _ ............. ..... .......... _ ......... _.__._....._.__..___.. ....... ....... ....... _.___...._ ... ___ ... ......... .. ....
.......
and to that end represent ..... and state..... as follows:
That said applicant _...._._.._ is ... a...... ............ __... ....... eitisen....._. of the United States; of poaE masai eharoeter
and repo te; and lux s... _attained the ape of $l years; that ...................... _.._ . ............... _ .......... ....... prepnelor........ of the
extabli.dunrnt for adlich the license will be issued if this application is praalea.
That manufacturer of such non.intarieatlnf malt liquors lxas any oumerShAX in wha4 a, In port,
in said of said applicant ..._. or any interest therein;
That raid apPlierrnt _. make ...._this application. pursuant and subiset to all the laws at the State of
Jtinnesota and the orvlinancee and repu.latians of said ... _ ............... Ci ............. _.............
applicoble thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby airoe......to abseroe and obey the same;
........__._...__'........._. ... ........................................._...... ........... ........ ......... .. .......... ........................ _ ........ ......... __._.
Ian.. WN oa,e MWM,e1} a W. N IaYI ! }fOwa,x }t
Recommend approval with restrictions and requirements as in past.
No beer allowed to be brought into bleacher or ball area ram outside.
Drivers license I.D. be required for pure
Beer not to be consumed off ball park are
teve Madson [
Police (Lief
Em It upplirant further sto trx that --he is not now the holder of, we has —he made application for,
nor doe.. _he inlend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the salt of
minxirating liquor.
Dale3_........ M14Y 16.... ..... _ ...... . ...... ..__., 1290_. '-e- q ...... J.. es. ...G.ol�..__....._.........._..
Board Member 4
Applicant......
F . O. A ddras..._._..... ............ .......................... ............_.........__....._.
u
0
•
/ — /3 i
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON THURSDAY,
MAY 3RD, 1990.
• PUBLICATION NO. 4111
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 257
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 90 -09, 90 -10 (S.A.P. 43- 507 -09), 90 -11, 90 -12
Hutchinson, Minnesota
April 24th, 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.N. on the 22nd day
of May, 1990, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota,
to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -09 - South Grade Rd. from Dale St. to School Site by the
Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks,
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -10 - Dale St. from South Grade Rd. to 400' North of Linden
Ave. by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Storm
Sewer, Sidewalks, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -11 - Goebel St., Graham St., Larson St., Kay St. North of
Goebel St. and 8th Ave. S.W. from Dale St. to 150' West of Graham St.,
• all in Wagner's Development Corporation Plat, by the Construction of Curb
and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -12 - Graham St. in Stillings -Hoeft Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances.
You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County
Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to
the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1990. You may, at anytime
thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or
interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeedi:.g year. If you
decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of
interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay
the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1990.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
$ 225,875.1L Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal ma be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such
notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual
• assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such furthzr notice to the affected
prcperty owners as it deems advisable.
dI
PUBLICATION NO. 4111
PAGE 2
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following •
procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify
by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits.
After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to
ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until
neither side has further questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call
witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same
procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with
the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they
may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of
evidence or testimony presented to the Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new
evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota •
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may,
in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it
would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special
assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that
law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any
assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution
adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment,
apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment
of this special assessment on his property.
Gary D. otz, Ci Administrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
u
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
ASSESSMENT HEARING
DALE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Letting No.3 / Project 90 -10
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 257A
May 22,1990 - 8:00 pm
CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK,
SURFACING, AND APPURTANCES ON DALE STREET FROM SOUTH GRADE ROAD
TO 400' NORTH OF LINDEN AVENUE
Total Construction Cost $232,147.01
Project Expenses $ 44,107.93
TOTAL PROJECT COST $276,254.94
PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN
• City Cost
Sanitary Sewer Construction $ 5,149.84
Sidewalk & Sign Construction $30,005.67
Extra Depth Asphalt $23,820.13
Extra Width Asphalt $ 6,164.20
Sideyard, Intersections and
Previously Paid Costs $28,238.47
County Fund Participation $21,981.96
Total City Cost
Total Assessed Cost
TOTAL PROJECT COST
ASSESSMENT RATES
A -Full Width Consruction,Linden to S Grade
S- Widening, Curb & Gutter, N of Linden Ave
C -Subd Agmt for Wagner's,Lot9 -B19 Sideyard
Driveway
Water Service
Sanitary Sewer Service
PAYMENT OPTIONS
• Full Payment
Full Payment
Assessment on
Deferment for
$115,360.27 (41.8 %)
$160,894.67 (58.2 %)
$276,254.94
Rd $42.59 /Front Foot
$20.49 /Front Foot
$42.59 /Front Foot
$23.80/Sq. Yard
$978.42/Each
$395.38 /Each
without Interest by October 1, 1990
with Interest through 1991 after October 1, 1990
Tax Roll, 10 Years With Interest, Equal Principal
Property Owners over 65 Years Old
•
REVISED RESOLUTION NO. 9240
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 257
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 90 -09, 90 -10, (S.A.P. 43- 607 -09), 90 -11, 90 -12
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -09 - South Grade Road from Dale Street to School Site by
the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks,
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -10 - Dale Street from South Grade Road to 400' North of
Linden Avenue by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Sidewalks, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -11 - Goebel Street, Graham Street, Larson Street, Ray
Street North of Goebel Street and 8th Avenue S.W. from Dale Street to
150' West of Graham Street, all in Wagner's Development Corporation Plat,
by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -12 - Graham Street in Stillings -Hoeft Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
•
and the bid price for such improvement is $313066.80, and the expenses
incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to
$59,501.70, so that the total cost of the improvement will be $372,668.50.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $156,833.98, and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefitted property owners is declared to be $215,834.52
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate
of 9 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of
Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially
assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his
office for public inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
•
City Administrator Mayor
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
RESOLUTION NO. 9261
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 90 -09, 90 -10, 90 -11, 90 -12
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -09 - South Grade Road
the Construction of Grading, Gravel
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
from Dale Street to School Site by
Base, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks,
Project No. 90 -10 - Dale Street from South Grade Road to 400' North of
Linden Avenue by the. Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Sidewalks, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -11 - Goebel Street, Graham Street, Larson Street, Ray
Street North of Goebel Street and 8th Avenue S.W. from Dale Street to
150' West of Graham Street, all in Wagner's Development Corporation Plat,
by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -12 - Graham Street in Stillings -Hoeft Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following
bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder Amount Bid
Wm. Mueller A Sons, Inc. $ 313,166.80
Duininck Bros., Inc. $ 358
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc. of Hamburg,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract with Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. of Hamburg,
Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement
contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved
by the City Council and on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder
shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
ty Administrator
Mayor
r� L
•
•
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 9260
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 257
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 90 -09, 90 -10, (S.A.P. 43- 607 -09), 90 -11, 90 -12
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -09 - South Grade Road
the Construction of Grading, Gravel
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
from Dale Street to School Site by
Base, Curb and Gutter, Sidewalks,
Project No. 90 -10 - Dale Street from South Grade Road to 400 North of
Linden Avenue by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Sidewalks, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -11 - Goebel Street, Graham Street, Larson Street, Kay
Street North of Goebel Street and 8th Avenue S.W. from Dale Street to
150' West of Graham Street, all in Wagner's Development Corporation Plat,
by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -12 - Graham Street in Stillings -Hoeft Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
• NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear
interest at the rate of _ percent per annum as set down by the adoption of
this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from October tat, 1990, until the 31st day of
December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1990; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November
• 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next
succeeding year.
'3
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
0
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists
of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the
same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
•
AVEYRON HOME r6
851 Dale Street • P.O. Box 176 !1aY1gg0
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 o ZECEWW
Telephone (612) 587 -6277 �� ay
May 17, 1990
Mayor Paul L. Ackland
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland:
The Aveyron Homes, Inc. recently received preliminary notices of assessments
for Project No. 90-10 of 1990 improvements. The total amount of the
assessments for the two city parcels owned by the non- profit corporation
equals $14,284.10.
• The Aveyron Home is an ICF -MR residential facility which serves 14
developmentally disabled adults. Our budget does not allow for unforeseen
costs. We do not receive any operating capital in advance and are forced
to budget from month to month. As a non- profit, tax exempt corporation,
we do not pay property tax and our budget does not allow for such
expenses.
The Aveyron Home Board of Directors are requesting that the Council grant
a deferment. of these special assessments. Not only would it cause great
hardship to make the payments; the corporation clearly would not have
available funds for payment of the assessment. Serious consideration of
granting a deferment would be greatly appreciated.
The Aveyron Home Board of Directors would also like to take this opportunity
to file this as a formal written objection to the assessment should such a
deferment be denied. We would also want to be on record as opposing the
project if our deferment should be denied.
7q'
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact us if we will be
required to apply to the City Clerk for the prescribed form for
such a deferral if it is granted.
Sincerely,
Doris Matejka
President
Aveyron Home Board of Directors
rk
•
•
/v
/l1c
,1
y Sb • � �<
� 9q
n� lF
T
r
/ 9e7,
f r M
/,L c , / 104 �
woe
/ � ..• �° /o f , � ��.
J.,,.,,..1,
R/ /y�
Q/ �r7 /fr
1 � -�
�^ ��
/yo G n. s
W Ou /c/ / / ✓� °� 6 a � Y� Y�
/ru J e q7�C! lCG r 4, r,� s ✓o/ /,
r
11 1 46, jjlzz--�
0
/Play ,;M 19 94
•
Ma y0 r and
c 4
i4L'Vkk[H.s'oti M. 55350
Re: AsSessme.t 1Jc.z57,4 .2578
Pru3at�� go - 46 -Oq go - logo -IIaµd 9x
Csww'4r �arce( Nn 2 3 - 14 5 -6o(6 C,4 Pureel/Vo 01- 11fo-30 -it -4554 AC4 -0.s
z3 - 145 -oo 70 ` 01 - 116 - 30 1/ - 0544 "_64
1, [' 1•
2.3 -1 f 5-00 &0 41 -116 -36 -11 -0570 4 67
y l• i-
z3-I - o0Y 10 0 - P'4 - 3a-R - O!Fke " ; of
,[ • A 3 '! 4 5 -0 0 3 a
" 61 - 116 - 30 'l/ - 05zi " Q.3
" 43 - 1 96 - 60 66 61 /16 -30-!1 - 0550 " "06
2 -oo70 " " "a1 1[b - 34 - 1/ 47
y 2 3 - 195 -0680 " ' o1 -//6 - 30 // -0570 "es
2. 3 - I!` - 0 0 `1 4 01 Ili - ?0!/ - 0584 , a9
�J
T kere b o� S ec o e f>ropdsed assessmeopds 6u yhe-
c _z,dve Parc S for �t1� �6dve- cc�P.et`n< eCYS
Te�u �i[Ke �o rrvlPW } �Le Suj - d 'v[!«H�tu 1 S46 f4 dko�
DrclleC� c0 J 40
ke-P� �u pP LJrrec�ec{. �ei,�s �9rPe,•we� [s C�l��t�.. -���-o
C[rorK W'-Jk e,,Cd -7 Aba c KCf had a c.haucF �� ve�iewiyG
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY,
MAY 8TH, 1990.
PUBLICATION N0. 4116
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 258
LETTING NO. 8
PROJECT NO. 90 -16
Hutchinson, Minnesota
May 8th, 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on the 22nd day
of May, 1990, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Butchinson, Minnesota,
to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of T.H. 7 from 5th
Avenue N.E. to 600' East of Garden Drive by the Construction of Watermain,
Sanitary Sewer, and Appurtenances.
You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County
Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to
the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1990. You may, at anytime
thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or
interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you
• decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of
interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay
the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1990.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City
Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is
;34,372.70. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed,
written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or
presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such
notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual
assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected
property owners as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following
procedure will be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify
by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits.
After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to
ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until
neither side has further questions.
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call
witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same
procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with
is the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
PUBLICATION NO.
PAGE 2
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they
may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of •
evidence or testimony presented to the Council.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new
evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or
City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and
filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon
the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may,
in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any
homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it
would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special
assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that
law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any
assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution
adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment,
apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment
of this special assessment on his property.
•
Gary D. Plgt¢, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
• RESOLUTION NO. 9262
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 258
LETTING NO. 8
PROJECT NO. 90 -16
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the
Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed
assessment for the improvement of T.H. 7 East from 5th Avenue N.E. to 600
East of Garden Road by the construction of Watermain, Sanitary Sewer and
Appurtenances;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made
a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment
against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments
extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be
payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear
interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of
this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from October 1st, 1990, until the 31st day of
• December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added
interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1990; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment
remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November
15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next
succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of
this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists
of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the
same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
•
City Administrator
M
PUBLICATION NO.
• ORDINANCE NO. 90_20 , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
CITY CODE SECTION 3.01 DEFINING UTILITY SERVICE; AND BY ADOPTING
BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code, Sec. 3.01 paragraph 5 entitled
"Service" is hereby amended to read:
5. "Service" means, but is not limited to , providing a
particular utility to a customer or consumer and also inclu the
Section 2. City Code, Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference,
as though repeated verbatim.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption
and publication.
. Adopted by the City Council this _ day of May, 1990.
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
First Reading: May 8, 1990
Second Reading: May 22, 1990
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on
•
7-A
RESOLUTION NO. 9263
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
ine Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
I
COST
PURPOSE DEFT.
BUDGET
VE UO3
T- Shirts
4,238.4
Recreation Programs
Rec.
Yes
Prints Charming
Water Meters (48)
2,589.6
Resale
Water
Yes
Water Products
Softballs (21 Doz.)
1,669.95
Recreation Program
Rec.
Yes
Kokesh Athletic
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
-ITEM
COST
PURPOSE I DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR
Date Approved:__ May 22 1990
W otion made by:
Seconded by:
Resolution subir_i.tted for Council action
by:
7- .B.
Eli
•
•
LA BORE & GIULIANI, LT D.
LEE L. LA BORE
EMILIO R. GIULIANI
BRADLEY T. COSGRIFF
MICHAEL T. HUGHES
STEVEN L. VILTOFT
LEGAL ASSISTANTS:
MICHELE M. HUDINSKI
JAN SAUER
May 9, 1990
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Plotz:
SUITE 150
HOPKINS OFFICE CENTER
33 SOUTH TENTH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 70
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 -0070
TELEPHONE (6121933-3371
FAX 1612) 933 -8298
M Jn
o
RECE
3Z
Pursuant to contract and on behalf of Junket Sanitation I hereby submit for
Council consideration to be discussed at the Board of Review meeting in June,
1990 the following commercial rates which are proposed as rates for containers
in the City of Hutchinson. You will note that the rate proposal is attached
hereto and marked Exhibit A.
Also at the Board of Review meeting, we would like the City Council to address
the mobile home trai er par nown as Country Club Terrace. Attached hereto and
marked as Exhibit B is a letter to Junker Sanitation from William R. Block
indicating a payment of $2.50 per lot for trash removal in the trailer home park.
It is the feeling of Junker Sanitation that the residence in the trailer home park
should be billed as other residential units in the City of Hutchinson because the
trash that t ey generate s equa to and, in fact, surpasses a residence in
Hutchinson because the contract requires Junker to pick up everything. As you
know, the trailer park has people moving in and out on a more frequent basis than
the normal residential community in Hutchinson. As a result, more trash in generated.
You will note that the increase in containe costs are $ 6.00 net month per container.
This increase is due not only to operational expenses of Junker Sanitation, but
also to the need of increased salaries for the employees of Junker Sanitation and,
of course, as you all know, the increases due to the expected dump fee increase
of 25% which vill g, ir.t effect June 1, 1990. Dump fees for 1989 for the City
of Hutchinson for January through December were $274,036.00. The dump fees will
be increased by 257, commencing June 1, 1990 and the anticipated increase will be
$68,509.00 for total dump fees from June 1, 1990 to June 1, 1991 of $342,545.00.
The above figure does not take into consideration any increase in yardage taken
to the landfill. To say the least, the dump fees have increased 1,450% since
9- 0 -6,2,
May 9, 1990
Page two •
19$0 when the total dump fees for the City of Hutchinson were only $23,794.00.
" ccording to the contract, the increase in commercial rates goes into effect July 1
` of each year so we would appreciate receiving a date for the Board of Review meeting
for sometime in June of 1990. If there is any additional information you would
like to receive for the Board of Review please advise.
Yours truly,
LaBo e & Giuliani, Ltd.
Lee L. LaBore
LLL /ml
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Alison Lutterman
Mr. James Junket
•
•
lEMBIT A
•
•
•
YD. CONTAINER
1
1}
2
c
4
3
i
PROPOSED RATE INCREASE
FOR
CONTAINER SERVICE: HUTCHINSON
DAYS PER WEEK
AMOUNT /MONTH
1
$ 37.20
2
66.40
3
93.60
4
120.80
5
148.00
6
175.20
1
$ 44.20
2
76.40
3
108.60
4
140.80
5
173.00
6
205.20
1
$ 49.20
2
86.40
3
123.60
4
160.80
5
198.00
6
235.20
1
$ 54.20
2
96.40
3
138.60
4
180.80
5
223.00
6
265.20
1
$ 59.20
2
106.40
3
153.60
4
200.00
5
248.00
6
295.20
1 $ 74.20
2 126.40
3 178.60
4 230.80
5 283.80
6 335.20
1 $ 89.20
2 156.40
3 223.60
4 290.00
5 358.00
6 425.20
Rate Increase, cont.
Page two
Increases are due to increase in operating expenses and a 25% increase in
landfill fees which goes into effect June 1, 1990.
•
0
E
HUTCH, INC.
369 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD • ST. PAUL, MN • 55101
• January 28, 1988
JUNKER SANITATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 246
Stillwater, Minnesota 55082
Attention: Mr
Gentleman:
James L. Junker
2T-2
Attached please find our check No. 1016 in the amount of $475 for
trash removal service for the month of December at Country Club
Terrace MHP in Hutchinson. The amount is based on $2.50 /lot for
the 190 trash producing homes in the park in December.
Hutch, Inc. purchased the park on December 1, 1987 from Mr. Gordy
Hedlund. Mr. Hedlund informed us that he has been'paying
$2.50 /lot for trash removal and has continuously advised your
• company to discontinue hauling if that rate was not satisfactory.
Your December 31, 1987 invoice No. 60510 shows a one month charge
of $1640.50 for trash removal; a rate of $8.63/lot which is
unprecedented in the mobile home park business.
Please be advised that we are willing to pay Junker Sanitation at
a rate of $2.50 /mo /lot for trash removal service. If this rate is
unacceptable, please contact the undersigned
Very truly yours,
HUTCH, INC
William R. Block
WRB:ad
•
W.R. BLOCK. GENERAL MANAGER 6i- 79R•oS F.a
(612) 587 -5151
JWJ37 ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
MAY lE, 1990
TO:MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
-----------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-----------------------------------
SUBJECT: JUNKER RATE ADJUSTMENT
Last year our adjustment to Junker Sanitation was based upon the
amount of refuse hauled into the landfill of the previous year.
The work sheet which was used last year has been updated with new
numbers from Ed Homan and Diane Olson.
. Attached is the completed work sheet for your information. It is
based upon $2.50 adjustment requested by Junker Sanitation. The
increase on the land fill addition would be $1.38 if the entire
$2.50 is landfill adjustments.
According to Ed Homan, the land fill is scheduled to in crease $4.
on the 1st of June. (Per the worksheet this would have a cost of
$2.20) Effective, July 1, 1990 a 50 cents per cubic yard will also
be put into place. (Per the worksheet this owuld have cost of 28
cents) Attached are the individual adjustments which would be put
into place with the rate increase scheduled.
Ll
9- A'Y a
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• JUNKER SANITATION
ANAYLSIS OF PROPOSED INCREASE
MAY 16, 1990
INCREASE OF 50 CENTS TO COVER JULY 1 INCREASE
TOTAL NUMBER OF BILLINGS 3459
RESIDENTIAL 3224
COMMERICLAL 235
CURRENT
PER MONTH CHARGE 12.05
JUNKER RECEIVES 11.90
RETAINED BY CITY 0.15
LANDFILL CHARGES
1988 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS 31,967.00
NEW LANDFILL COST
• COST
PER MONTH COST 15,983.50
10.00
10.50
NUMBER OF
MONTHS
12.00
66 PERCENT RESIDENTIAL 10,645.01
33 PERCENT COMMERICAL 5,322.51
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL COST 3.30
TOTAL RESIDENT COST INCREASE BY # OF ACCOUNTS
COST PER MONTH
El
3.30 DIVIDED BY 12 MONTHS
319,670.00
335,653.50
15,983.50
1,331.96
0.28
9A -it.8,
TOTAL NUMBER OF BILLINGS
RESIDENTIAL
COMMERICIAL
CURRENT
PER MONTH CHARGE
JUNKER RECEIVES
RETAINED BY CITY
LANDFILL CHARGES
1988 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS
NEW LANDFILL COST
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
JUNKER SANITATION
ANAYLSIS OF PROPOSED INCREASE
MAY 16, 1990
INCREASE OF $4.00
3459
3224
235
12.05
11.90
0.15
31,967.00 10.00
14.00
NUMBER OF
COST MONTHS
PER MONTH COST 127,869.00 12.00
66 PERCENT RESIDENTIAL 85,160.09
33 PERCENT COMMERICAL 42,580.04
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL COST 26.41
TOTAL RESIDENT COST INCREASE BY # OF ACCOUNTS
COST PER MONTH
26.41 DIVIDED BY 12 MONTHS
•
319,670.00
447,538.00
127,868.00
10,655.67
•
2.20
9, -A*-B,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. JUNKER SANITATION
ANAYLSIS OF PROPOSED INCREASE
MAY 16, 1990
REQUESTED INCREASE TO $2.50
TOTAL NUMBER OF BILLINGS 3159
RESIDENTIAL ;1224
COMMERICIAL 235
CURRENT
PER MONTH CHARGE 12.05
JUNKER RECEIVES 11.90
RETAINED BY CITY 0.15
LANDFILL CHARGES
1988 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS
31,967.00
10.00
319,670.00
NEW LANDFILL COST
12.50
399,587.50
79,917.50
NUMBER OF
COST
MONTHS
PER MONTH COST
79,917.50
12.00
6,659.79
66 PERCENT RESIDENTIAL 53,225.06
33 PERCENT COMMERICAL 26,612.53
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL COST 16.51
TOTAL RESIDENT COST INCREASE BY # OF ACCOUNTS
COST PER MONTH
16.51 DIVIDED BY 12 MONTHS
1.38
•
ff (612) 587.5151
yvrcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
FOR YOUR INFORMATION"
MAY le, 1990
TO:MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
--------------------------------------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL WATER USAGE
----------------------------------------------------------------
Per your request we have randomly selected several commercial
businesses and the amount of water used. If you would desire any
additional information please give me a call.
If we make any general adjustments to the computation across the
board rates maybe affect. The current rate structure was based
upon the assumption of winter quarter usage. If we would alter •
this method of computation a restudy of the rates would be
necessary.
I
CITY OF IOTCI11301
1AT 17, 1990
LI7001
1161 6A MIES
1C O6AI
111FE
81019
CArLS
6EIC1311
1.1311T1
"IA1111
STORE
101:11 ACCMT'O
I1391AIC1
LAITEIS
HUB!
CAFE
F00DO
D61T19T
LOOSE
i1I`ES qt
61D11C 101T1
DBC.
DEC BE
DEC
DEC
DEC
DEC
91C
9 .,
91C
I:1TE1 Q0AiT13
1959/1990
S
T? 12
2:
25
?
70
51
1 19
i
No 17
25
19
64
54
24'?
?!
142 ::
Ci
15
:4
+
22' :i
c
17J
(612) 587.5151
H/�cy CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
May 9th, 1990
Mr. Carlie Rarg Mr. Don Gilbertson
Rt. 3 950 Luedtke Lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Rarg and Mr. Gilbertson:
In response to your reqeust for a Building Permit to install a drainfield,
which would not comply with appropriate setbacks, I have the following comments
and suggestions:
1) The City is under agreement with M.P.C.A. to provide sanitary sever to
all parcels which can reasonably be reached. Exceptions to this must
be approved by the City Council and M.P.C.A.
2) The Engineering Department has informed me that a City Project has been
proposed and designed for Luedtke Lane, and it makes little economic sense
in replacing substandard septic systems when service is available.
If you presently are in a bind, I suggest you provide temporary measures, such
as a holding tank and request sanitary service from Hutchinson's Engineering
Department.
Thank you for your inquiry.
r -
Be egards, i!
J G. Marks
Building Official
JGM/pv
cc: Mayor and City Council
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
Cal Rice, Asst. City Engineer
Mark Hensen, Bldg. Insp.
•
9J 9
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
/ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
:HINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
DATE: May 22nd, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Ludtke Lane
Gilbertson Sanitary Sewer Hookup
Don Gilbertson, 950 Ludtke Lane, currently has a non - operating
drainfield. The sanitary sewer to serve this general area was
originally proposed to be constructed in 1988, and then again in
1989, but was rejected due to resident opposition. As noted in Jim
Marka's attached letter, our agreement with MPCA calls for the City
to provide sanitary sewer to all parcels that can be reasonably
reached by the municipal system. We believe it does not make sense
to have Mr. Gilbertson construct a drainfield, when municipal
sanitary sewer is within the area, and in fact, was recently
• proposed to serve his property.
We completed a preliminary design and cost estimate for a sanitary
sewer line to serve his property. The route was modified from
earlier proposals to avoid recent obstructions, such as trees and
homes, and to provide direct access to, and construction on, his
property. We believe that this is currently the most feasible
route to serve this property. We propose to only construct that
portion of the originally proposed project that is required to
serve Hr. Gilbertson's property, stopping at MH 3, as noted on the
attached drawing.
The Estimated Construction Cost for this project is $16,200, which
relates to a Project Cost, including expenses, of $19,300. We
propose that Hr. Gilbertson pay a standard connection rate at this
time, with that amount credited against future assessments. Future
assessments against all of Ludtke Lane are proposed to include at
least a portion of this project's cost. Since Hr. Gilbertson's
home covers both Lots 11 and 12, we propose to base the assessment
on the short sided benefit of the combined property for this
assessment. We propose an assessment of 93.8 front feet at $19 /FF,
or $1,782.20, plus yard restoration costs of $550.00, for a total
proposed assessment of $2,332.20.
This would leave approximately $17,000 of City Cost, at least part
. of which we could assess with future projects along Ludtke Lane.
John P. Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
JPR /pv
9 �).
LUDTKE LANE
c R,
�s
a
I - - -�
g
Fed.
No.
(612) 587 -5151
0
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
May 9th, 1990
Mr. Carlie Rarg Mr. Don Gilbertson
Rt. 3 950 Luedtke Lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350 Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Rarg and Mr. Gilbertson:
In response to your reqeust for a Building Permit to install a drainfield,
which would not comply with appropriate setbacks, I have the following comments
and suggestions:
1) The City is under agreement with M.P.C.A. to provide sanitary sever to
all parcels which can reasonably be reached. Exceptions to this must
be approved by the City Council and M.P.C.A.
2) The Engineering Department has informed me that a City Project has been
proposed and designed for Luedtke Lane, and it makes little economic sense
in replacing substandard septic systems when service is available.
If you presently are in a bind, I suggest you provide temporary measures, such
as a holding tank and request sanitary service from Hutchinson's Engineering
Department.
Thank you for your inquiry.
Be egards,�
I
J G. Marka
Building Official
JGM/pv
cc: Mayor and City Council
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
Cal Rice, Asst. City Engineer
Mark Hensen, Bldg. Insp.
1 J
Donald Gilbertson
950 Ludtke Lane
Hutchinson, MN 55350
May 15, 1990 •
John Rodeberg
City of Hutchinson Engineer
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Mr. Rodeberg,
As City Engineer, you have probably been informed by
your assistant Cal Wright of my dilemma. A building permit
requested by my designee Mr. Karg for the repair of a poorly
functioning drain field was refused by Mr. Marka, whose title
is City Building Official. In a letter sent to me by Mr.
Marka and subsequent phone conversations with him, an agreement
between the City of Hutchinson and the EPA was given for
this refusal of the building permit request.
I am therefore requesting that the City of Hutchinson
provide to me a sewer line at the earliest possible time.
I have requested this service twice in the past ten years.
It was also my understanding that when this section of town
was annexed some years ago, that the promise of sewer and
water hook -ups were made at that time. I further request
that the City of Hutchinson not delay this project by making
a bigger project out of this than it has to be, by requiring •
the other homes along Ludtke Lane to be hooked up at this
time.
My request is this: A sewer main be brought in to the south
of my property ( lots 11 & 12 Johnson's Court) along lot
lines located on California Street. The sewer line would
be brought from California Street in an Easterly direction
to Ludtke Lane and terminate there. The distance of the
line would be approximately 300 feet more or less. That
line could be used to service my property at that time.
I would also request that all costs associated with the construction
and installation of this line be deferred until such time
that the major improvement project would be completed and
all houses along Ludtke Lane and houses near by along Northwest
5th avenue be hooked up to sewer and water service.
Let me explain my frustration with this issue. The initial
construction of this house was in the summer of 1977. The
house was not even completed before the first of several
'mishaps' occurred regarding the hapless drain field in question.
Despite my efforts to show a Hutchinson Utilities Commission
employee the location of the septic tank and drain field
an incident of damage occurred. This incident consisted
of the severing of pipes in the drain field by a Hutchinson
Utilities Commission work crew while in the process of installing
a gas pipe. Repairs were made by a contractor, Mr. Don Rettman,
who also made the initial construction.
r1
U
Our problems persist. We cannot replace the drain field
because of all the utility services that have been installed
onto my property in the last few years. I had the electric
service put underground during the initial construction.
I saw no need to re- install that service, just because it
came from a different direction. I also do not subscribe
to cable television, yet the cable company, by extension
of some imminent domain of city easements decided it was
important to trench wires up to my house. These latest installations
were without my consent or advice. I wouldn't be at all
suprised if one of these services would be found as the root
of my current problems.
•
The Hutchinson Utilities Commission were not the only
culprits in 1977. Another part of my sewage system was damaged
that year. The other damage was caused by the Hutchinson
Telephone Company. This damage was not discovered by me
until after I suffered through three years of slow drains
and blockages. I finally discovered that the Phone Company
had trenched the phone line into my house directly through
the main pipe leading into the septic tank. Unfortunately
prior to this discovery I had already made the first of two
additions to my drainfield. Employees of the Hutchinson
Telephone Company maintained that they had no knowledge of
the damage at the time the telephone line was installed.
However, the Telephone Company did make repairs to the broken
pipe, three years after the damage.
It was around this time that I made my first inquiry
of the City of Hutchinson regarding providing me with a sewer
hook -up. At that time there was no development to the west
of my property, and I was told that when that development
occurred, it would be likely that services would be extended
to Johnson's Court.
The anticipated development of the California Street
area has been complete for some years now. In conjuction
with that development, the Hutchinson Utilities Commission
trenched in Electrical lines on the western edge of my property.
Again my drain field was damaged by a city employee. I was
told by employees of the Hutchinson Utilities Commission
•
that the work crew had been operating within the limits of
their easement, and therefore had no culpability. This occurred
approximately four years ago. Because of the natural slope
of the land and the broken pipes I could not stop the flow
of effluents from the drain field. It appeared that the
disturbance of the drain field at that time caused a collapse
of a substantial portion of the drain field. Realizing the
seriousness of the problem I petitioned the City of Hutchinson
for sewer service in 1988. The item was brought before the
City Council at that time. The Council tabled the request.
Our problems persist. We cannot replace the drain field
because of all the utility services that have been installed
onto my property in the last few years. I had the electric
service put underground during the initial construction.
I saw no need to re- install that service, just because it
came from a different direction. I also do not subscribe
to cable television, yet the cable company, by extension
of some imminent domain of city easements decided it was
important to trench wires up to my house. These latest installations
were without my consent or advice. I wouldn't be at all
suprised if one of these services would be found as the root
of my current problems.
•
I also cannot make any repairs or additions to the drain
field, because of "regulations and agreements with the EPA"
The best solution of all would be to hook up to the
multi million dollar sewage treatment plant, which was built
with tax dollars. Except that the City Council, in it's
infinite wisdom and overall willingness to serve it's
constituents has tabled my request for this service. In the
process of dealing with this situation over the years I
have become quite bitter and more than a bit angry. The
City of Hutchinson has a responsibility here. As a citizen
and a taxpayer I am very very tired of hearing the standard
bureaucratic mumbo - jumbo. I need some problem solving,
which government is supposed to be so good at. My incon-
veniences over this matter have been enough to qualify me
for martyrdom, and my considerable expenses have been wasted.
Sincerely,
n� m
`/ Donald Gilbertson
F_ I
CC
Jim Marka --------- Hutchinson Building Official
Paul Ackland - - - -- -Mayor of Hutchinson
Barry Anderson - - -- Hutchinson City Attorney
File
•
RESOLUTION NO. 9264
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259
LETTING NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 90 -05, 90 -o6, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Ave. to South Termini by
Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to
North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Grravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Paula Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and
Garden Road by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter,
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
• Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Island Drive in the 5th
Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.W. to Railroad Tracks
by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous
Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances;
and the bid price for such improvement is $ , and the expenses
incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to
$ , so that the total cost of the improvement will be E
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be ; , and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefitted property owners is declared to be S
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate
of 9 per --ent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
• 3. The
City Administrator, with the assistance of the
Director of
Engineering,
shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to
be specially
assessed for
such improvement against every assessable lot,
piece or parcel of
land within
the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his
office for public inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed 40
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
•
RESOLUTION N0. 9265
RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259
LETTING NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 8th day of May,
1990, the City Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of
the cost of improving:
Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Avenue to South Termini by
Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to
North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Pauls Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and
Garden Road by the Constrtuction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
• Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Islard Drive in the 5th
Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.W. to Railroad Tracks
by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous
Base, Bituminous Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such
proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 26th day of June, 1990 in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and
at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the
notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice
• to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not
less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid October 1st, 1990. He may at any time thereafter, pay to
the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,
with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be
charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
41
0
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administratorlr,� -_
PROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Police
DATE: May 10, 1990 F �
RE: Farmers Market
In response to Kay Johnson's memorandum to you dated May 2, 1990,
regarding the Farmers Market I would like to outline my response
to her recommendation for painting numbers on the street.
First of all I would like to advise you that I have been involved
in several meetings regarding the Farmers Market and have found the
committee to be extremely cooperative and has made every attempt
to find the most workable solution to assist in reducing the
traffic hazards which have existed in the past.
The idea of number the traffic stalls was developed as a result of
• the past problems of people arriving earlier than anticipated and
setting up so as to obtain the most desireable location for selling
their product. I belie that numbering the parking spaces would
be extremely_ beneficial toward eliminating some the previous
problems however, "elieve that the expense of doing_ this should '
be borne by the Farmers Hark C ooperative a n ot h y e C it of
Hutchinson. -- - -- -- --
The closure of the street (First Avenue S from Hain Street to
Hassan Street) for the Farmers Market I believe is very
advantageous toward providing for the safety of not only the
farmers displaying product by also the patrons of the Farmers
Market. I have advised the Farmers Market pursuant to Section 7.04
of the City Code that I will allow the closure of the one block
section of street during the Farmers Market sales period. I would
also like to point out that I have advised the Farmers Market
Cooperative that under no circumstances will the Police Department
tag or tow any vehicle found parked along First Avenue S during the
Farmers Market sales period. I would like to also point out that
the Farmers Market Cooperative has agreed to place signs alerting
motorists parking along First Avenue S in the area where the
Farmers Market will be set up notifying said motorists of the
Farme -s Market and the times in which the Farmers Market will be
opern_;.ag. further believe that those signs should be erected
at the expense of the Farmers Market Cooperative. I believe that
each farmer who will be participating in the Farmers Market will
• be paying an entry fee and I believe that any expense of the
Farmers Market should be borne by that cooperative and not by the
City of Hutchinson.
F
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
May 10, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions concerning this memorandum or any
concerns which you feel need to be addressed at this time please
do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.
90 -02 -0032
/lkg
(612) 587 -5394
H - U - T - C - H - I - N - S•O•N
. �'V ?, loon
I
Can? Vi
t`-PSe itrrs!
N
4 v
i-v `-1e C1 - St E''[er:+SC? t'S "r2�. �t"sS. l ``C
t ''as �Ofm - as`_ t'AF-rs. ?f! f'i'��� �i -_! +.Ce 1.S t�:�S -enr
.r rill
c " _ _
!' Ct..'c?c:t) . � fA i '+ <q' �^P. FPSEIZ'f'L� rt`eet e
��
Is T''_ ^1 C rT+FCes t''15 • /P2S. ?s it tC SC^C�'.Ct� (r :t ?1 T-r---ixrs cn.
Sri ?CES £:P2. s _?_ nC__S (SC-e att^ -&C-d ^ter- r rce si crt�'
s ^o_ c .e mss Cc- Seen _c: the _`ar'�rs to s ?.t In t`ie'_r tr'.:'s
CcLMt Sr eo !xu t-,7L -=- cv c., 2 to ?_1?rviP
M• i N. N.�. c.
37 Washington Ave. W. • Hutchinson,
Ll
-F
• nrcr'c*t� �_nt�j�r c -� p„� "Pr1� cn� •T!'_r
5 (�i
K !�
P f�
o r5
M 13
L 1�
K !i
.1 1�
T 9
M 8
£ 5
D 4
CIj
a
ME
ME
►n
ME
®►!/,
mirej
v
o C
r
a�
a3
101 `A4 Pia t1,
6rcth
'al-
Anat
"1 Tc FC11"f •g 'Ci Rr rl �7 P'T PJ 7 �Yi ^ZT ` * /'.I�t �' !'? C. ? " IC "
Pesen'& Stalls P--?. Sraces
1 -37: Pre reserved Pasf ir^ Ftallq. Fprrrs vdll cjiivc` into tte Pjascrial 0
sracc arc'. sell cx:t of tun bac'• of &-eir true): into t'+.e street. o
table vill t c a11ca•ed be>,i -2 cacl'. tnie%
P. - ": Are repnrved Ta' C.. acps. _c%, s^aCe iS t'P S ° - C' CF
mp ras'j -r Stall. Faz-r --s rest rvrovir'e &rir ar. ••e ct tal-1e. Fas^es
r
rece_ -.rLr� Gil 1e Brace 1 X11 hT,e to •+e7t: tbcir v&icles cutsir'.e e` t' e
"Y&Tt -T e earn &cir - oc)r'S in. Par' ir.r is a +.rilat le r.*- t } 1
P1acp Int or erou^d p�.rt• rit+• iscourare fa 41 Par',;
Trrrs from he e j._
it Front o_` t'`.e lilkrar• c- ! ��. + „ � ,
e_cz acre Please be considerate
o_` &cir nar'-ir_q reees. rPz* rrs rttt le,2ve c.�� irr space t•etaae t theL`-
table and trot- ? ir &e tr ra -ke ttr Parl'inn Stall. l•'e a to e�ant costa_
,'all irs, or. &.e Cit• Par } - Wass.
This svrbolizes app spaces. These spaces t rct I reserved, They
will be available on a first cxrie, first serve basis eac.'t f,b6leseAv
and FaturdRv,
''i a reserver? Par?-i -s- Sta3.1 are' Tel`le Space design for &e 1990 %zi rtaad_,
available space. F'e have a- TDmilately 37 reserved F,2.17-.ino Stalls, 26 Reserved
Table Fnaces and 11 Omen.. Snr.ces with room For P-Odltimtel Table Fraces. This -
Fives us rata: for more ti-on 7L Fanners.
Please list belay the Cure of Brace %"I vAUid lit e. Also, list wur first
tl+ree srace recvests.
Reserved Parl• Stall Reserved Table Space
Location #1 Location P1
Location 01). Ic+cation f2
Location 03 Location P3
(- ease mint or tww)
Parr:
Address:
City: State: Zirmode:
Tele•+ttatte:
Noti'rication of Fraee assimric ^t rdll be. sent by Jura. 1, loon,
(612) 587.5151
Harpy.` CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHHVGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCH NSO1 MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: Mav 17, 1990
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COTICIL
------------------
FROM: _ DOUG MEIER, MAINTENANC_ OPERATIOIS SUPERVISOR — — _ — —
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION PURCHASE
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
On April 16th, 1990, the City of Hutchinson advertised for bids to
purchase a new 1990 Front -end Wheel Loader as a replacement for the 1972
wheel loader we oresently own.
Bids were received from Carlsons Lake State Equipment, Burnsville, M,N;
• Case Power and Equipment, Shakopee, MN; and Ziegler Caterpillar from
Minneapolis, MN. The results are as follows:
Case Power and Equipment (Model 621)
Total Price Bid $70,663.00
Less Trade -in 9,200.00
Net Price (with Guaranteed Maintenance) $63,963.00
Net Price (without Guaranteed Maintenance) $61,463.00
5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance Program cost $2,500.00 or $500.00 per year.
Carlson's Lake State Equipment Co (Model 544E)
Total Price Bid $81,710.00
Less Trade -in 10,810.00
Net Price (with Guaranteed Maintenance) $70,900.00
Net Price (without Guaranteed Maintenance) $67,300.00
5 Year Guaranteed !Maintenance Program cost is $3,600.00 or $720.00 cer year.
L�
9 -C-l-,
Ziegler Caterpillar (Model 926E)
Total Price Bid $83,266.00
Less Trade -in 6,500.00 •
Net Price Bid (with Guaranteed Maintenance) $80,266.00
Net Price Bid (without Guaranteed Maintenance) $76,766.00
5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance Program cost is $3,500.00 or $700.00 per year.
After reviewing all the bids submitted and noting the exceptions to the
s_.ecifications, it is my recommendation that all exceo *_ions be waived and that
Case Power and Equipment Company of Shakopee, MN be awarded the contract for
supplying one (1) new 1990, Model 621, front -end loader to the City of
Hutchinson for the net price of $63,963.00. This price includes the trade -in
of the City's used 1972, Michigan front -end loader to Case Power and Equipment
and also includes the cost of the 5 year Guaranteed Maintenance Program.
This unit was scheduled for replacement this year and $85,000.00 was
the amount set aside as replacement cost. The unit recommended to be
purchased came in at $21,037.00 under budget.
•
MEMORANDUM
• TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Gary Plotz, City
Steven Madson, Chief of Polic
May 15, 1990
FBI National Academv
Administrator
This memorandum will serve as a request for authorization to attend
the FBI National Academy located in Quantico, Virginia from January
6, 1991 through March 22, 1991. As you are aware, I was nominated
for the FBI National Academy in September 1989 and subsequently
approved by the FBI following a background investigation. I was
originally scheduled to attend from April 1, 1990 through June 15,
1990. However, due to the untimely death of Officer Mike Hogan
it was felt that my attendance during the aforementioned period
would not be advisable due to the many situations which were
needing immediate attention. The FBI has graciously consented to
hold over the opening until the January 6, 1991 class.
I have been in contact with the FBI and the FBI is requesting
confirmation as to the attendance at the January 6, 1991 class
session. At this time I need to have the approval to attend and
• the approval to expend the necessary monies to provide uniforms and
equipment while attending the academy.
It appears that the following monies would be needed to attend the
National Academy,
Incidental Expenses Q $3.50 /day $262.50
Black Athletic Shoe 50.00
Academy Uniforms 200.00
Academy Physical Fitness Uniform 100.00
Student Assessment 100.00
TOTAL $712.50
Additionally, it will be necessary for me to obtain another
physical as required by the FBI.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum
please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.
90 -02 -003
/lkg
•
9�
(612) 587 -5151
ff ITY OF H UTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
OHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 18, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: REPORT OF SUFFICIENCY OF ADDITIONAL SIGNATURES NEEDED FOR
INITIATIVE PETITION (LIQUOR)
The City Staff was able to verify 68 additional signatures on new
petitions submitted, who are registered voters. As you may recall
they were 49 signatures short of meeting the 20% requirement of
those voting in the last Mayor's election.
We have now verified a total of 240 signatures. 221 signatures
• were needed. This represents 21.74% of those voting in the last
Mayor's election.
I would suggest the City Attorney review Chapter 5 regarding this
petition to determine the subsequent appropriate action by the
Council.
GP /bb
cc: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
•
q-
F_ 1
11
CHAPTERS
Initiative, Referendum, and Recall
Section 5.01. GENERAL VOTER AUTHORITY. The
voters of the city shall have the right, 1n
accordance with this charter, to propose
ordinances, to require ordinances to be submitted
to a vote, and to recall elected public officials
by processes known respectively as the initiative,
referendum and recall.
Section 5.02. PETITIONS. An initiative,
referendum or recall, shall be initiated by a
petition signed by registered voters of the city
equal in number to 20 percent of those who voted
for mayor in the last preceding city election.
Each petition shall be sponsored by a committee of
five registered voters whose names and addresses
shall appear on the petition. A petition may
consist of one or more papers, but each paper
circulated separately shall contain at its head or
attached to it the statement required by Sections
5.06, 5.07 or 5.08, as the case may be. Each
signer shall sign his name and give his street
address. Each separate page of the petition shall
have appended to it a certificate, verified by
oath, that each signature is the genuine signature
of the person whose name it purports to be. The
person making the certificate shall be a resident
of the city. Any person whose name appears on a
petition may withdraw his name by a statement in
writing filed with the city administator before
the city administator advises the council of the
sufficiency of the petition.
Section SA3. DETERMINATION OF SUFFICIENCY.
Immediately upon receipt of the petition, the city
administrator shall examine the petition as to its
sufficiency and report to the council within 20
days. Upon receiving the report, the council
shall determine by resolution the sufficiency of
the pe"
7
Section S.04. FURTHER REGULATIONS, 1,
council may provide by ordinance such furt,er
regulations for the initiative, referendum, and
recall, not inconsistent with this charter, as It
deems necessary.
Section 5.05. DISPOSITION OF INSUFFICIENT
PETITION. If the council determines that the
petition is insufficient or irregular, the city
administrator shall deliver a copy of the
petition, together with a written statement of its
defects, to the sponsoring canmittee. The commit-
tee shall have 30 days in which to file additional
signature papers and to correct the petition in
all other particulars. If at the end of that
period the council finds that the petition is
still insufficient or irregular, the city adminis-
trator shall file the petition in his office and
notify the sponsoring committee. The final finding
that the petition is insufficient or irregular
shall not prejudice the filing of a new petition
for the same purpose nor shall it prevent the
council from referring the ordinance to the voters
at the next regular or special election at Its
option,
Section SAG- INITIATIVE. Any ordinance,
except an ordinance relating to the budget or
capital program, the appropriation of money, the
levy of taxes, or the salaries of city officers or
employees, may be proposed by a petition which
shall state at the head of each page or attached
thereto the exact text of the proposed ordinance.
If the council passes the proposed ordinance with
amendments and a 4/5 majority of the sponsoring
committee do not disapprove the amended form by a
statement filed with the city administrator within
10 days of its passage by the council, the
ordinance need not be submitted to the voters. If
the council fails to enact the ordinance in a
acceptable form within 60 days after the final
determination of sufficiency of the petition, the
ordinance shall be placed on the ballot at the
next election occurring in the city. If no elec-
9 1r
I
tion is to occur within 120 days after the filing
of the petition, the council shall call a special
election on the ordinance to be held within such
period. If a majority of those voting on the
ordinance vote in its favor, it shall become
effective 30 days after adoption unless the
ordinance specifies a later effective date.
Section 5.07. REFERENDUM. Any ordinance
Subject to the initiative may be subjected to
referendum by a petition which shall state, at the
head of each page or on an attached paper, a
description of the ordirance. Any ordinance upon
which a petition is filed, other than an emergency
ordinance, shall be suspended in its operation as
soon as the petition is found sufficient. If the
ordinance is not thereafter entirely repealed, it
shal 1 be placed on the ballot at the next election
or at a special election called for that purpose,
as the council determines. If a majority of the
voters voting thereon favors the ordinance, it
shall go into effect immediately or on the date
specified in the ordinance; if a majority of the
electors voting thereon votes against the
ordinance, it shall be considered repealed upon
certification of the election results. If a peti-
tion is filed against an emergency ordinance, the
ordinance shall remain in effect but shall be
repealed if a majority of the voters voting on the
ordinance vote against it.
Section 5.08 THE RECALL. In the recall
petition of any elected official of the cit e
committee shall certify to the city adminis r
the name of the officer whose removal is sought, a
statement of the grounds for removal in not more
than 250 words, and their intention to bring abc6t
his recall. A copy of this certificate shall be
attached to each signature paper and no signet_:re
paper shall be put into circulation previcus to
such certification.
Section 5.og RECALL ELECTION. If the
petition or amended petition is found sufficient,
the city administrator shall transmit it to the
council without delay, and shall also officially
notify the person sought to be recalled of the
sufficiency of the petition and of the pending
action. The council shall at its next meeting, by
resolution, provide for the holding of a special
recall election not less than 30 nor more tha
days after such meeting, but if any other elec
is to occur within 60 days after such meeting, the
council may in its discretion provide for the
holding of the recall election at that time.
•
(612) 587 -5151
f/l11CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASF/1NGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 22. 1990
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Water Billing Department
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for the month of May
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of May. Recommend water service be discontinued on
Tuesday, May 29th, 1990 at Noon.
•
•
9 -s
3- 030 -0630 -061 3- 275 -0460 -132
Ron Folkers Country Club Terr
630 Second Av SE Hutch Inc
Hutchinson MN 55350 369 E. Kellogg Blvd
630 Second Av SE St Paul MN 55101
150.12 460 California St
cc: Vicky Klabunde 5,733.91
Route 1 Box 218
Brownton MN 55312
•
40
3- 275 - 0486 -053
3- 030 - 0646 -089
Vance Woller
Debbie Schmidt
486 California St
646 Second Av SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
486 California St
646 Second Av SE
100.14
50.28
cc: Vicky Klabunde
Route 1 Box 218
3-320-0481-052
Brownton MN 55312
James Reilein
Promises 6/01/90
481 Clark St
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 080- 0250 -041
481 Clark St
Vance Haugen
114.42
250 Fifth Av NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
250 Fifth Av NW
3 -330- 0314 -062
146.55
Lowell Litzau
314 College Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
314 College Av
3- 130 - 0136 -041
178.68
Miles Willhite
Promises 6/08/90
136 11th Av NE
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 330 - 0795 -041
136 11th Av NE
Mark Betker
150.11
795 Colorado St
Promises 6/29/90
Hutchinson MN 55350
795 Colorado St
157.26
3- 210- 0326 -071
Dennis Gregor
3- 380 - 0405 -051
326 Adams St S
David Freund
Hutchinson MN 55350
405 Erie St S
326 Adams St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
142.98
405 Erie St S
60.87
Promises 6/01/90
3- 210 - 0416 - 081
- 500 - 0316 -082
Calvin Lee
Ta Olson
416 Adams St S
316 Hwy
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutch' on 5350
416 Adams St S
31 wy 7 E
156.25
.89
•
40
3- 530- 0712 -021
3- 715 - 0025 -012
Vince Jahner
Harris Pen Inc
•
712 Hilltop Dr
P.O. Box 549
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
712 Hilltop Dr
25 Michigan St
156.30
148.65
cc: James Schlagel
656 Juul Rd
3- 735 - 0336 -011
Hutchinson MN 55350
Dale Schlueter
336 Monroe St S
3- 600 - 0430 -085
Hutchinson MN 55350
Brian Midtling
336 Monroe St S
430 Kouwe St
188.62
Hutchinson MN 55350
430 Kouwe St
3- 735 - 0425 -036
31.30
Barb Cartie
Promises 6/01/90
425 Monroe St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 655 - 0823 -071
425 Monroe St S
Jan Schmidt
103.71
823 Lindy In
cc: Merry Biss Hudlowe
Hutchinson MN 55350
1315 Parkview Dr
823 Lindy Ln
Chaska MN 55318
65.00
Promises 6/08/90
3- 765 - 0825 -022
•
3- 680 - 0715 -071
Roy Chaffee
Don Vorbeck
825 Oak St
715 Main St N
Hutchinson MN
Hutchinson MN 55350
825 Oak St
715 Main St N
100.14
121.56
Promises 5/25/90
3- 800 - 0575 -012
Rodney Markgraf
3- 680 - 0715 -151
575 Peterson Circle,
E Chaffee Ceramics
Hutchinson MN 55350
715 Main St N
575 Peterson Circle
Hutchinson MN 55350
192.9.6
715 Main St N
38.30
3- 870 - 0707 -071
Promises 5/25/90
Jeff Hart
707 Shady Ridge Rd
3- 680 - 0877 -011
Hutchinson MN 55350
Sharon Sauter
707 Shady Ridge Rd
877 Main St N
210.81
Hutchinson MN 55350
877 Main St N
82.29
cc: Bruce Crosby
879 Main St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 5/31/90
•
1- 005 - 0145 -093
Rhonda Hoseck
Apt B
905 20th Av SE
Willmar MN 56201
145 First Av NE
76.32
cc: Dan Mattson
Route 1
Dassel MN 55325
1- 550 - 0723 -088
Denise Kulseth
Plaza 3 Echo D #204
Hutchinson MN 55350
723 Ivy Lane
88.12
cc: Bob Asp
P.O. Box 388
Victoria MN 55386
1- 685- 0815 -058
Angelica Galduroz
West Falls Apts #281
Redwood Falls MN 56283
815 Main St S
166.14
cc: Ben Menton
Rt 1 Box 16
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 080 - 0125 -072
Curtis Berry
R.R.
Silver Lake MN 55381
125 Fifth Av NW
101.95
cc: Robert Sandstede
125 Fifth Av NW
Hutchinson MN 55350
3 -330- 0344 -001
Lowell Litzau
314 College Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
344 College Av
333.94
cc: Norbert Nelson Jr
Gaylord MN 55334
Promises 6 /08/90
0
U
RESOLUTION NO. 9266
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
. ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259
LETTING NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of:
Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Ave. to South Termini by
Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to
North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Grravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Pauls Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and
Garden Road by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter,
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
i Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Island Drive in the 5th
Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.W. to Railroad Tracks
by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous
Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances;
and the bid price for such improvement is $387,957.20, and the expenses
incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to
$73,697.86, so that the total coat of the improvement will be $460,955.06.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $93,005.16, and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefitted property owners is declared to be $367,949.90
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate
of 9 per ce,iz. per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
• 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of
Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially
assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of
land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as
9 -1<11"
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
•
provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his
office for public inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
RESOLUTION NO. 9267
• RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259
LETTING NO. 5
PROJECT NO. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 8th day of May,
1990, the City Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of
the cost of improving:
Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Avenue to South Termini by
Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and
Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to
North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Pauls Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and
Garden Road by the Constrtuction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the
Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances;
• Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Islan Drive in the 5th
Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.W. to Railroad Tracks
by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous
Base, Bituminous Surfacing, and Appurtenances;
AND WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such
proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of June, 1990 in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and
at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such
improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such
assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official
newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the
• notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice
to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not
less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
9 ��
RESOLUTION NO.
PAGE 2
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to •
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to
the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid October 1st, 1990. He may at any time thereafter, pay to
the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,
with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is
made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be
charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
•
/ (672) 587 -5757
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. a �r•,oa , -'. /'� 3 7 .h \ ^. ��rl "JvL �f ✓�.�il
hVrN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 16, 1990
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE
AITERICAN LEGION TO MOVE A 10 X 12 UTILITY SHED
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby ;submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On April 18, 1990, the Hutchinson American Legion, submitted an
application for a conditional use permit to allow them to move a
• 10' x 12' shed unto property located at 35 - 3rd Ave. SE. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, May 15, 1990 at which time there was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3,
1990.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be granted as
set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
• Clint Gruett, Vice Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
9-L.
Q
-�f
ul
i
i
ft
r
J
i
f q�
RESOLUTION NO. 9268
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
MOVE A 10' X 12' UTILITY SHED UNTO AMERICAN LEGION PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. The Hutchinson American Legion, has made application to
the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of
Zoning Ordinance No. 464 at allow them to move a 10' x 12' utility
shed unto property located at 35 -3rd Ave SE with the following
legal description:
Lot 4 and West 42.8' of Lot 5, Block
27 Townsite of Hutchinson South Half
City of Hutchinson
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 22th day of May, 1990.
•
ATTEST:
Gary D. P1ot.z
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
(612) 587.5151
�I' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HOTCHINSON, MINN 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 16, 1990
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
HARVEY GETZ TO MOVE A 10 X 16 UTILITY SHED
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On April 9, 1990, Mr. Harvey Getz, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a conditional use permit to allow him to move a 10'
• x 16' shed unto property located at 100 Oakland Ave. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, May 15, 1990 at which time there was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3,
1990.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be denied as
set forth above. The Planning Commission would approve a 10' x 12'
utility shed.
• Respectfully submitted,
Clint Gruett, Vice Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
0
0
k e-xj sf �
0
7 37 (612) 587 -5151
/T Y OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
TCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 16, 1990
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN ON ADREY JOHNSON ESTATE
REQUESTED BY DAVE LORENCE (2 MILE RADIUS)
The Planning Commission recommended to reject the plan as
presented.
• NOTE: The following items were discussed:
- Lynn Township approval
- Road alignment
- Meet Shoreland ordinance requirements
— Possible future annexation into the City
•
9 -ltl.
LYNN TOWNSHIP
� N
CJ
N CY
TO: EDWIN E. HOMAN, MCLEOD COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: LYNN TOWNSHIP BOARD )A-"
LINNEA KLASSEN, CLERK
DATE: MAY 1, 1990
SUBJECT: DAVID LORENCE SKETCH PLAN, SECTION 2 6 10, LYNN
TOWNSHIP
On May 1, 1990 at their regular monthly meeting, the Lynn
Township Board denied approval of the David Lorence Sketch
Plan. The reason for denial is because of Adrey Johnson's
efforts over the past years to prevent errosion of the
shoreline and preserve the site in its natural state. There
is some question whether developing this land may be in
violation of the "Sod Buster" law.
cc: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
n
is
•
r1
U
0
•
COUNTY OF McLEOD
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
May 7, 1990
Mr. Edwin E. Homan
McLeod County Zoning Administrator
830 11th Street East
Glencoe, MN 55336
Re: David Lorence Sketch Plan
Dear Mr. Homan:
MAY 7
County " nirig
55336
wa..od
It would need to be understood that no approaches off CR 82
would be granted to the individual lots. I certainly would
prefer to see this road line up with the one to the north,
but due to site distance problem, this may not be possible
here. Some study of this issue should be done if the plan
advances.
Sincerely,
P ichard K7 as, P.E.
McLeod County Engineer
st
?-Al
P.O. Box 236 • Glencoe, Minnesota 65336 • (612) 864 -3156 An Equal Opportunity Employer/A,
TCWNSHIP 116 NORTH
�AEKE
,xa
'
F L�
• I
V In
A.
W
1 i
I
1 7
A A
LYNN
CODE- 5
1pN II
RANGE 30 WEST
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
9 -nor
worm (rose SP T"
9 -nor
worm (rose SP T"
4
1K 11'T VAR
.111.9
2
I RG
r)
L W
L r
T i0r I
-.44 1
PRELIMINARY
SKETCH T "
OF PROPOSED
PLAT
PART OF WI/2 OF SW I/4
OF SEC 2
PART OF E 1/2 OF NE V4
OF SEC. 10
PART OF W 1/2 OF NW 1/4
OF SEC. I I
ALL IN T. 116 N. R. 30 W.
V,NFYJM LOT SIZE • I ACRE
L'IN'MUM LOT WIDTH - 1 50 FEET
"NIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FAI SHORELINE
-75 FEET
4
1K 11'T VAR
.111.9
2
I RG
r)
L W
L r
T i0r I
-.44 1
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHING; ON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: May 16, 1990
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF MILLER TOWNHOUSE 6TH
ADDITION
The Planning Commission recommended to approve the plat as
presented.
•
�J
p'pa LLLp\ lvnjI"wU4L UL11 JiUUA I sun
t .
Hgnrpf t +ovn ame• elenr.on T iWS O IJ 5 Comp of Enq:neppl FINAL PLAT
:.J�r ^a.:,•:u� of L S,%tlG 103b
VIN 0
J ` r r
Lbr J
'. i •<• `!I `fit ( � ' t N \
�
o ' 9 °tif J ..
O � 1r '•mil
0
.( l
O N
O a
1
\ \ C
LOT
r
� �� o ✓ roof lrb � (��,� f
\ v a
y .
}
' J
' a..a nel -• •GPI ��La I \ it a / r
t f
J 4r; napr I ^e mosl s.:vm e•I� /' { F .
/ the tars = pea 3 ana be-.eon! e
iyy -rre One ton•e•s ..• One common rays O .", roe 0.0d.r �
i fne soureeJ••e•1/ c' Lap
1 i> nv.:rm. f •o nave a D....• I
• RESOLUTION NO. 9269
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT OF
MILLER TOWNHOUSE SIXTH ADDITION
WHEREAS, Richard McClure, owner and subdivider of the property
proposed to be platted as MILLER TOWNHOUSE SIXTH ADDITION has
submitted an application for approval of the final plat of said
subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the
Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had
thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described
lands in McLeod county, to -wit;
Lot 5, Block 1, STONEY POINT ADDITION, according to the
recorded plat thereof. Except the southwesterly 4.50
feet thereof.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
• 1. That said final plat
is hereby approved and accepted
conformity with all ordinances,
City of Hutchinson and the laws
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such
certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit
required, shall be conclusive showing of
therewith by the subdivider and City officials
above described and shall entitle such plat to
forthwith without further formality.
of MILLER TOWNHOUSE SIXTH ADDITION
by the City as being in accord and
City plans and regulations of the
of the State of Minnesota.
execution of the
y Administrator, as
proper compliance
charged with duties
be placed on record
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of May, 1990.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
_ 64,
0
HUTCHINSON IRON & METAL CO., INC.
304 First Avenue S.E.
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
May 14, 1990
Mr. James Marka
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Jim,
I am writing this letter as a follow -up to our conversation regarding
. mobile scrap - yards. As you know, I am upset about the various scrap
metal businesses setting up in parking lots around town. These
businesses do not comply with the zoning ordinances as currently
written. The fact that these scrap metal businesses call themselves
recycling centera does not negate the fact that they are in essence
scrap metal reprocessors. I do not consider it right or proper that I
must comply with the zoning ordinances, pay considerable property
taxes as well as the latest special assessments for curb and gutter
being installed in our neighborhood, as well as employ members of the
community all to the betterment of the Hutchinson economy while the
above mentioned businesses come into town, disregard the local zoning
laws, contribute nothing to the tax base or the local economy and
compete with me on an "unlevel" playing field.
I am therefore asking that either these business be made to conform
with the local zoning ordinances or be banned from Hutchinson. It is
my understanding from our previous conversations that this is possible
under our local zoning laws.
If the city choses to make exceptions for recycling businesses, I would
deem it necessary to change the name. of my business from Hutchinson
Iron and Metal inc. to an appropriate name in order to exempt myself
from the rest.r_ctive ordinances imposed upon my business. This would
enable me to ez tablish myself in any neighborhood throughout the town
as the mobile scrap yards are presently doing. I would rather not be
forced to take such steps. I would rather see the other scrap yards
comply with the current ordinances.
1 9�
As you know from our previous conversations, other small cities
throughout the state have dealt with the same problem in a similar
manner and I hope we can do the same. Please let me know if there is
any additional information I can present to you regarding this matter.
As usual your help is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely, /7
`Jay P Freedland
President
i
3
W (612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 17th, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Municipal Code Revisions
Chapter 12: Subdivision Regulations (Platting)
Attached is a copy of proposed revisions to the Subdivision Regulations of
Hutchinson. The revisions were made after review by Jim Marks and myself.
The revisions clarify our policy on Sketch Plans, require review of all
contiguous property under the same ownership, modify Preliminary Plat Data
requirements in regards to Utility and Grading Plans to protect proposed and
• adjacent development, add a review and letter of recommendation from the City
Forester, and modify small subdivision requirements.
We would like the City Council and City Attorney to review the proposed
revisions and comment if you feel changes are required. We would then like
to proceed with amending the City Code and setting a Public Hearing.
I will be at the Council Meeting to answer any questions.
P!
Syi
JPR /pv
attachment
40
Updated 4/16/90
•
is
E
SUB - ANALYSIS
Title Page
CHAPTER 12 SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (PLATTING) 363
Section 12.01 General Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . 363
12.02
Definitions. 364
12.03 -12.08 Reserved
12.09 Sketch Plan
12.10 Preliminary Plat . . . . 367
12.11 -12.19 Reserved
12.20
Final Plat . .
12.21 -12.39
Reserved
371
12.40
Minimum
Improvements Required. .
374
Subd. 1
General. . . . . . . . . . .
374
Subd. 2
Official Map . . . . . .
374
Subd. 3
Drainage and Flood Hazard Areas.
374
Subd. 4
Community Assets . . . . . . . .
374
Subd. 5
Monuments and Stakes
375
Subd. 6
Public Site and Open Spaces. . .
375
Subd. 7
Street and Block Layout.
377
Subd. 8
Minimum Widths for Streets and
Alley Right -of -Way . . . . . . .
379
Subd. 9
Minimum Pavement Widths and
Surface Type . . . . . . . . . .
380
Subd. 10
Street Grade, Curves and Sign
Distances. . . . . .
38J
Subd. 11
Intersections. . . . . . . .
38
Subd. 12
Lots . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
383
Subd. 13
Utilities and Drainage
383
Subd. 14
Other Requirements
385
Subd. 15
Subdivision Agreements
386
Subd. 16
Easements. . . . . . . . . . . .
386
12.41 -12.59
Subd. 17
Reserved
Public Utilities . . . . . . . .
387
12.60
12.61 -12.69
Modification and Exceptions. . . . . . . .
389
Reserved
12.70
Enforcement.
390
12.71
12.72 -12.79
Schedule of Fees, Charges and Expenses
Reserved
390
12.50
vaczances.
. . .
391
12.81
.
Special Application Requirements
391
12.82 -12.98
.Reserved
12.99
Violation
a Misdemeanor. . . . . . . . . .
392
(7 -1 -89)
SEC. 12.09. SKETCH PLAN.
Subd. 1. Submission to Planning Commission •
Lne plan.
C) Type of development Proposed
•
Subd. 1. Advisory Nesting with City Planning staff.
Before preparing a Preliminary Plat and submitting it to the
Planning Commission for approval, and after submitting the Sketch
Plan. the subdivider shall meet the consult informally with the
City Planning Staff for the purpose of reviewing the locations of
proposed major streets, parks, playgrounds, school sites, and other
planned projects which may affect the property being considered for
subdivision. At the same meeting, the subdivider shall review with
the City Planning Staff the minimum standards of subdivision design
set forth in Section 12.40. This informal review should prevent
unnecessary and costly revisions in the layout and development of
the subdivision. Formal application or filing of a plat with the .
1
ieuulreu of Lne sunaiviaer tor the submission of a sketch Plan
Al Site Location
SEC. 12.10. PRELIXINARY PLAT.
City is not required for this informal advisory meeting.
0
•
Subd. 2. Preliminary Plat Required. Before submission
of a Final Plat, the subdivider shall prepare and submit to the
City Administrator Preliminary Plats of the land he proposes to
develop as described in Subdivision 4, Subparagraph B of this
Section. The Preliminary Plats shall be submitted only after the
advisory meeting with the City Planning Staff and prior to the
making of any street improvements or the installation of anv
Subd. 3. Preliminary Plat Data. The Preliminary Plat
shall meet the standards of design as set forth in Section 12.40
and shall show the following information:
A. Scale of one hundred (100) feet to one (1) inch or
larger.
B. Name of subdivision, name and address of the owners,
the engineer or surveyor, and the owners of the adjacent property.
C. Location of subdivision by section, town, range or
other legal description together with small scale sketch showing
location within the section.
D. Date of preparation and of latest revision (if
applicable), approximate north point, and graphic scale.
E. Acreage of land to be subdivided.
F. Zoning classification of lands to be subdivided and
all adjacent lands within 300' of the Preliminary Plat
G. Boundary lines of area to be subdivided, their
bearings and distances, and total acreage calculated to the nearest
0.1 acre.
H. Existing and proposed easements and their locations,
widths, and distances.
Z, Street lot line and easement locations within 100'
of the proposed plat
J.
K. Lot line, lot numbers,
dimensions.
and approximate lot
• 2
L. Sites and their acreages, if any, to be reserved or
dedicated for parks, recreation areas, open spaces, schools, or .
other public uses. Sites, if any, for semi - public, commercial, or
multi - family uses.
M. Minimum building setback lines.
N. Location of railroads, streams, lakes. marshes,
wooded areas drainage tiles natural and proposed drainage
courses, permanent buildings, and other structures or significant
Physical features.
P.
Q. UTILITY PLAN: A plan for utility service shall be
presented with the Preliminary Plat. The Utility Plan shall
include: Utilities on and adjacent to the tract showing proposed
connections to existing utility systems. Data to be provided
includes types of utility; location of sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
and watermain lines, manholes, catch basins, hydrants, etc;
R. GRADING PLAN: A plan for grading drainage and
1. Existing contours at two (2) foot intervals in
dashed lines and proposed contours at two (2) foot
intervals in heavier solid lines.
3
•
•
anu emergency overflow or pending
0
6. Proposed garage slab and lowest floor
elevations for each lot. Lots proposed for
walkouts shall be so noted.
7. F_loodway. Flood Fringe Boundaries and 100 Year
Flood Elevations.
S. Additional Information to be Supplied
I
development.
2.
•
Copies of proposed deed restrictions, if any.
4. Other reasonable information, such as
percolation or other soil tests, if so requested by
the Planning Commission in order to make 'a proper
review of the site.
6 A location map clearly showing the plat
location in the City.
eubd. 4. Preliminary Plat Procedures.
A. Prior to submittal of the Preliminary Plat, in
the case of any proposed plat which includes lands abutting upon
any existing or established trunk highway or proposed highway which
has been designated by a center line order found in the office of
the County Recorder, the plat shall first be presented to the
Commissioner of the Department of Transportation for his written
comments and recommendations. The Commissioner of the Department
of Transportation shall submit written comments to the City in
accordance with State law. In requesting the comments of the
Commissioner of the Department of Transportation, the subdivider
shall include a written statement describing the outlet for and
means of disposal of surface waters in the proposed platted area.
•
at plat boundary.
S. Four copies of the Preliminary Plat and .
supplementary material specified shall be submitted to the City
Administrator for filing with a written application for conditional
approval.
C. The City Administrator shall, upon receipt of
a Preliminary Plat, retain one copy, refer one copy to the Zoning
Administrator, and refer two copies to the Engineer for review as
to completeness of information. If found to be incomplete, the
application will be returned to the developer. If found to be
complete, the plat will be referred to other City Department Heads,
the Utilities Commission, the Telephone Company and Cable T.V., for
review as necessary.
D. Upon review by City Department Heads, the City
Forester. the Utilities Commission, the Telephone Company and Cable
T.v., the copy of the plat together with all comments and suggested
revisions shall be referred to the Planning Commission for a public
hearing. The Preliminary Plat shall receive the approval of the
Engineer as to engineering considerations prior to consideration by
the Planning Commission. A certificate of approval by the Engineer
shall be attached to the Preliminary Plat. A letter of
E. The City shall notify the subdivider by mail of
the time and place of the public hearing not less than five (5)
days before the date fixed for the hearing. Similar notice shall
be mailed to the owners of the land immediately adjoining the area
to be subdivided as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Time and place
of the public hearing shall be published at least once in the
official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing.
The publication shall include a drawing which shows the location of
the proposed subdivision.
F. Within sixty (60) days after the hearing on the
Preliminary Plat, the Planning Commission shall recommend approval,
disapproval, or approval subject to modifications of the said plat
to the Council. Failure of the Planning Commission to act on the
Preliminary Plat within sixty (60) days shall be deemed a
recommendation of approval of the plat. If a plat is recommended
for disapproval, reasons for such disapproval must be stated in
writing. If approval subject to modifications is recommended, the
nature of the required modifications shall be indicated in writing.
The Planning Commission shall then forward the Preliminary Plat
together with its recommendations to the Council for final action.
The final action of the Council shall be noted on two (2) copies of
the Preliminary Plat with any notations made at the time of
approval, disapproval of the specific changes required. One (1)
copy shall be returned to the subdivider and the other placed on
file in the office of the City Administrator.
5 40
G. Approval of the Preliminary Plat shall not
. constitute acceptance of the Final Plat. The approval of the
Preliminary Plat shall lapse unless a Final Plat based thereon is
submitted within sixty (60) months from the date of such approval.
An extension of time may be applied for by the subdivider and
granted by the Council.
Subd. 5. Plat Review Charge. A filing fee will be
charged at the time of filing the Preliminary Plat to offset
administrative costs in processing the application submitted; no
additional fee will be charged for filing a Final Plat. Such fee
will be computed on the basis of a minimum fee as determined by
resolution of the Council.
U
0
8ec. 12.60. MODIFICATION AND EXCEPTIONS.
Subd. 1. Major Subdivisions. The general
principles of design and minimum requirements for the layout of
subdivisions set forth in Section 12.40 may be varied by the
Council in the case of a subdivision large enough to constitute a
more or less self- contained neighborhood which is to be developed
in accordance with a comprehensive plan safeguarded by appropriate
restrictions, and which, in the judgment of the Council, makes
adequate provision for all essential community requirements;
provided, however, that no modification shall be granted by the
Council which would conflict with the proposals of the Official Map
or with the other features of the City Comprehensive Plan, or with
the intent and purposes of said general principles of design and
minimum requirements.
Subd. 2. Small Subdivision. In the case of a
subdivision of small size and minor importance, situated in a
locality where conditions are well- defined, and containing not more
than two lots fronting on an existing street not involving any new
street or road or the extension of municipal facilities and not
adversely affecting the adjoining property, the Council may exempt
stipulated in Section 12.10 pertaining to the preparation of the
Preliminary Plat. All subdivisions larger t han two lots shall
required.
Subd. 3. unusual Pbysical Conditions. In any
particular case where the subdivider can show that, by reason of
exceptional topographic or other physical conditions, strict
compliance with any requirement of this Chapter would cause unusual
difficulty or exceptional and undue hardship, the Council may relax
such requirement to the extent deemed just and proper, so as to
relieve such difficulty and undue hardship, provided that such
relief may be granted without detriment to the public good and
without impairing the intent and purposes of these regulations or
the desirable general development of the neighborhood and the
community in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning
Chapter. Any modification thus granted shall be entered in the
minutes of the Council setting forth the reasons which, in the
opinion of the Council, justified the modification.
(Section 12.61 through 12.69, inclusive, reserved for future
expansion.)
•
is
Ammendment to page 389 (4- 16 -90) 0
MINUTES FOR YOUR INFORMATION
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
• Tuesday, May 15, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Clint Gruett
at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent,
E1Roy Dobratz, Dean Wood, Craig Lenz, Tom Lyke and Vice Chairman
Gruett. Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka and City
Engin -ser John Rodeberg.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Dobratz made a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting dated Tuesday, March 20, 1990 and the special
meeting dated Monday, April 30, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the
m_rtion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY NORM PONSFORD TO MOVE A MANUFACTURED HOME
Vice Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7:35 p.m.
Building Official Jim Marka stated he has received the
• necessary documents today but the documents require a
Registered Engineer's signature and DAPIA numbers. He
will present all information to the State. Staff
recommends continuing the hearing and will review with
the State.
Mr. Ponsford commented on the problems of waiting so long
and stated he submitted his application before the
requirements came about.
Mr. Lee Heinen, 410 School Rd, questioned if property
values would drop.
Mr. Ebent asked if there would be an attached garage and
residing of the house. Mr. Ponsford stated he would
paint and retrim the house.
Building Official Marka explained the original staff
comments were intended for the continuity of the
neighborhood. Mr. Ponsford stated the neighboring
property owner has the same roof line. He also
explained the back door will not work for an attached
garage. Gi-�cussion followed on attaching the garage and
the roof line recommendation
0 1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
5/15/90 0
Mr. Jack Alfredson, 1235 Roberts, is also concerned about
the value of property and the visibility of that corner.
Mr. Ponsford again stated his plans are to blend into the
neighborhood.
Building Official Marka asked the Planning Commission to
form a consensus of the continuity of the neighborhood.
Mr. Gruett agrees with the neighboring property owners,
it doesn't fit the location. Mr. Lyke commented on pride
of ownership and it means a lot to any homeowner. He is
concerned with the discrimination issue and senses the
Ponsfords would not have junky property and is in favor
of the conditional use permit. Mr. Ebent stated he is
bothered with the continuity issue. He is in favor and
agrees with Mr. Lyke. It will be a nice property when
finished. Mr. Dobratz agrees with Mr. Lyke and Mr. Ebent
on the discrimination issue and is favorable to the
request. Mr. Wood stated there are some things that do
need to be done to the home and stated it would have a
detrimental effect to the value of the neighborhood. He
is not in favor of the request. Mr. Lenz commented he is
not convinced the home would fit the neighborhood and
would not be in favor of the request. •
Building Official Marka stated the sketches are not for
a wood foundation so would need new sketches.
Mr. Lyke moved to continue the hearing to the June
meeting, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE
AMERICAN LEGION TO MOVE A 10X12 UTILITY SHED
Vice Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:10 p.m. with
the reading of publication #4114 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3, 1990. The request
is for the purpose of considering a conditional use
permit to allow the owner to move a 10' x 12' utility
shed unto property located at 35 -3rd Ave SE.
Mr. Roger Olson stated the shed will be moved to the
South side. Building Official Marka commented the shed
should be 6' off the property line.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke
the hearing closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion
2
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
• 5/15/90
to approve the request subject to staff recommendations
of 6' from property lines. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the
motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
HARVEY GETZ TO MOVE A 10 UTILITY SHED
Vice Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8 :16 p.m. with
the reading of publication #4115 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3, 1990. The request
is for the purpose of considering a conditional use
permit to allow the owner to move a 10 utility shed
unto property located at 100 Oakland Ave.
Building Official Marka commented on the ordinance
limitation of 120 sq. ft. and no larger for moving
utility sheds.
Mr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by
Mr. Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:17 p.m. Mr. Ebent
moved to deny the 10 shed but would approve a
10'x12' shed. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried
unanimously.
• 4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF DECK ADDITION WITH ROOF REQUESTED BY VERN
BRELIJE, 922 HASSAN
Mr. Brelije would like to ask for a variance if possible
to construct a roof onto the deck. He stated the
neighbors do not object. Discussion followed on the set
back.
Building Official Marka stated a deck alone would not
need a variance but adding a roof establishes a building
line and requires a variance. Discussion followed on the
approval of a variance and general consensus of the
commission is to deny the request. The Planning
Commission instructed the Building Official review with
the owner to establish the setbacks to verify dimensions.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN ON ADREY JOHNSON ESTATE
REQUESTED BY DAVE LORENCE (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Dave 1,orence explained the sketch plan. There was
discussion on block 1 and the ability to build on the
lots. 75' is the minimum setback from shoreline.
• Discussion followed on the unusual layout of the roads.
3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
5/15/90 •
Building Official Marka stated the City and County follow
requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. The issue may
come up to annex this land into the city. Discussion
followed on the desirability of the property. The
Planning Commission requested City Engineer John Rodeberg
draft a letter to the county and city council stating the
4 main points of the discussion.
Mr. Lyke moved to reject the sketch as presented,
seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF MILLER TOWNHOUSE 6TH
ADDITION
Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the plat, seconded by
Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(d) DISCUSSION OF REVISED ZONING ORDINANCE WITH BILL WEBER,
BRW, INC.
Mr. Weber was present to explain the draft. Building
Official Marka began by posing 9 questions and asked if
the changes could be marked.
1. Keep the same zoning districts •
2. Define building line
3. Estimate and establish Shoreland Ordinance and
overlay
4. Staff submitted the C -3 sign ordinance
5. Submitted FEMA ordinance with codification of
city code
6. Do we want to zone out mobile home prior to
1976 code or not?
7. Mr. Weber will explain differences in parking
lot circulation drive
8. Separate recycling of metal
9. Conforming land uses
Mr. Weber stated that 95% of draft comments are
acceptable and agreeable. He explained R -3 mid or high
density is between single family and high density. Could
be put next to single family zones. Building Official
Marka stated this is what the PUD controls and how would
we incorporate on the zoning map. Mr. Weber stated the
map does not need to be done now and suggested all
attached housing be permitted only by conditional use
permit. This creates a zone that doesn't allow
apartments but does allow attached housing Mr Weber
should review and make preliminary recommendations as to
where to incorporate the zone. •
4
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
• 5/15/90
City Engineer Rodeberg stated that the zone suggested
would act as a buffer zone and be reasonable.
Discussion followed on the square footage of the
townhouses and apartment units.
Mr. Weber commented that I -2 does not need to be placed
on the map but have it in the ordinance. He also stated
the landscaping plan should be presented. Discussion
followed on the site plan review and that presently staff
reviews. Mr. Weber explained site plans should be
carefully reviewed by staff, Planning Commission and City
Council.
The Planning Commission set a goal to complete draft for
Public Hearing by Sept. 1, 1990.
(e) DISCUSSION OF GARAGE ADDITION ON MONROE ST
Discussion followed on the request of a conditional use
permit for a non - conforming building. A suggestion was
to move the garage back to permit parking not to block
the sidewalk.
40 (f) PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY PLATTING PROCEDURE BY JOHN
RODEBERG
City Engineer Rodeberg explained the proposed changes.
(g) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Building Official Marka commented on a letter by Jay
Freedland stating his concerns with recycling aluminum
cans in the city.
5. ADJOURMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
11:05 p.m.
0
5
(612) 587.515/
HUTCH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
- 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
-�- HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
MAY 16, 1990
TO:MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
-----------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-----------------------------------
SUBJECT: TRAILER COURT WATER USAGE
Per your request is.the water usage (in thousands of gallons) for
the past 3 years. The current ordinance directs the city to charge
for sewer based upon the winter quarter usage. This should be the
lowest water usage for the year. In the trailer courts this seems
to be generally true.
If we make any general adjustments to the computation across the
• board rates maybe affect. The current rate structure was based
upon the assumption of winter quarter usage. If we would alter
this method of computation a restudy of the rates would be
necessary.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MAY 17, 1990
COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
1990 1989
(,000)
WINTER QUARTER. ENDING MONTH
WINTER QUARTER 1990
QUARTER 3
OCA9.TER 2
QUARTER 1
ANNUAL TOTAL
0
FEBRUARY
4,097
4,282
3,921
3,412
4,946
7,135
4,040
5,044
17,004
19,873
9 -h.
MCDONALDS
TRAIER
COURT
1988
1990
1989
198
JANUARY
4,128
1.331
1,430
1,39:
3,685
1,412
1,8E9
1.O6.
3,2
1,6r 7
1,354
1,14
31068
1,383
1,308
1,11_
11,172
3,r j
6,461
a
9 -h.
(612) 587.5151
ITY Of HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
:HINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 17th, 1990
TO: Steve Madson, Chief of Police
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
Mayor and City Council �
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official
RE: Status of County Club Terrace Mobile Home Park - Evacuation Plan
As directed, I contacted Mr. Charles Schneider with the Dept. of Health and
inquired on the status of Country Club Terrace lack of storm shelter facilities.
The inquiry was a result of receiving the following documents (attached).
1) Unsigned and undated letter from Mr. William Block regarding Evacuation Plan.
2) Citation letter from Mr. Schneider, Chief of Environmental Services, Dept. of
Health, for determination whether to initiate license revocation proceedings.
• 3) Inspection Report - Inspector Sheldon Christenson, Dept. of Health, orders
dated 8 -23 -1989.
In discussion with the City of Hutchinson's Administration, Police Chief, Mayor
and City Council, it appears the City of Hutchinson has not formally approved
Mr. Block's Evacuation Plan, as required by the Dept. of Health.
In consideration of the plan as presented, I have been informed by Police Chief
Madson, that special council consideration needs to be addressed prior to
approval of the Police Station Basement. Concern over the use of the Police
Station Basement was expressed.
It is also the Administration's concensus, that the proposed individual
arrangements by each resident is unacceptable and encourages vehicular traffic
during an emergency situation.
In an effort to expedite this matter, I an carbon copying the appropriate
persons and requesting Mr. Block's immediate attention to this matter through
this memo.
I�G. Marks
Building Official
• JGM /pv
attachments
cc: Mr. Charles Schneider, Dept. of Health
Mr. William Block, 369 East Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55101
9 -s,
HUTCHINSON COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE
4th Avenue N.W. & California
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 587 -2060
TO: Residents of Country Club Terrace Mobile Home Park
FROM: William Block (Owner)
Re: Severe Weather Warning Siren
In the intrest of safety for all of the residents in this park, it is re-
commended that each resident make their own arrangements with family or
friends living in town to be able to use their basement during such emergency.
As a last resort for residents that are without friends or family living in
Hutchison, the basment of the police department will be made available, but
only as a last resort.
RESIDENTS LIVING ON "D" AND "E" AVENUE WILL LEAVE THE PARK IN ANY TYPE OF
AND EMERGENCY VIA THE STREET EXIT ON THE EAST END OF OF "D" AVENUE.
THE REMAINING RESIDENTS WILL LEAVE THE PARK VIA THE STREET EXIT ON THE EAST
END OF "A" AVENUE.
Following the above mentioned directions will result in separating the flow
of traffic leaving the park, and will make for a quick evacuation of the park.
Any further questions on this matter that you wish to ask, you can call or
visit the manager's office on lot number (35) or by phone at (587 - 2060).
William Block
cc: Paul Ackland (Mayor)
Chief of Police
City Attorney
3z - 7 . � �4 / (7)
327 . zoS
•
11
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA !V`J ,� �r� 3 ORE THE MINNESOTA
• COUNTY OF HENNEPIN , n ORE
OF HEALTH
CITATION FOR DETERMINATION WHETHER TO
INITIATE LICENSE REVOCATION PROCEEDING
In the matter of the
Revocation of the Manuf?ctured Home Park C
License o f Hutch Incorporated
1990 Licensa #0278 C TO: Hutch Incorporated ,
Country Club Terrace Mobile Home Park
369 East Kellogg Boulevard `.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55103
You, the above named Hutch Incorporated, are hereby cited to appear
before the duly authorized employees of the Minnesota Department of Health at
the Dinnaken Office Building, Conference Room 2, 925 Delaware Street S.E., in
the City of Minneapolis, County of Hennepin, on the 6th day of April, 1990, at
10:00 a.m. to make answer to the charges herein contained and show cause, if
• any you have, why a contested case hearing should not be initiated to
determine whether your license to operate a manufactured home park, granted
and issued by the State Department of Health pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 327, should be revoked and why you should not be enjoined and
restrained from further operation of your place of business as a manufactured
home park, by reason of your violation of and persistent refusal and failure
to comply with, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 327 (1989),
Sections 327.14 through 327.28, particularly Sections 327.20 Subdivision 1 (7)
and 327.20 Subdivision 2, and rules promulgated thereunder, particularly
Minnesota Rules Parts 4630.0800 and 4630.1200, as to the sanitation and safety
of your licensed establishment, as more specifically enumerated as follows:
Hutch Incorporated
&a
9
The 1987 session
manufactured home
reads as follows:
of the Lenislature amended the tars governing
parks. The section of the Statutes is 327.20 (7) and
"A mar.;factured home park with ten or more manufactured homes, licensed
prior to March 1, 1988, shall provide a safe place of shelter for park
residents or a plan for the evacuation of park residents to a safe place
of shelter within a reasonable distance of the park for use by park
residents in times of severe weather, including tornadoes and high winds
The shelter or evacuation plan must be approved by the municipality by
'arch 1, 1989. The municipality may require the park owner to construct
a shelter if it determines that a safe place of shelter is not available
within a reasonable distance from the park. A copy of the municipal
approval and the plan shall be submitted by the park owner to the
department of h;slth."
You were notified of this amendment in a letter dated January 18, 1989.
The letter also stated that as of that date, we had not received any
documentation indicating that your shelter or evacuation plan had been
approved by the municipality in which the park is located, namely the
City of Hutchinson. The letter a1- stated that this information must be
submitted by March 1, 1989. The required information was not submitted.
In an inspection report dated August 23, 1989, the fact that the shelter
or emergency evacuation plan must be approved by the City of Hutchinson
was again brought to your attention. No response has been received to
that inspection report.
2. In the inspection report dated August 23, 1989, certain violations of
Minnesota Rule Parts 4630.0800 and 4630.1200 were cited. That report was
sent to you by mail. A copy is attached as Exhibit A.
The issue to be determined at this conference is whether to initiate license
revocation proceedings.
Under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 (1988),
information given to the Department will be public and will be used by the
Department in evaluating the complaints made against you. The information
requested at the conference covered by this notice is not legally required to
be supplied. However, if you refuse to supply requested information, you
could be subpoenaed to appear at another conference and required to respond or
an enforcement proceeding could be initiated against you. Information
received at the conference covered by this notice may in some circumstances be
forwarded to certain other persons or entities for further legal action,
including the City of Hutchinson, Department staff and the staff c` the
Attorney General's Office, and persons whom they contact. Should this matter
proceed to a full contested case proceeding, the information will be presented
to the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings and /or any reviewing court.
Hutch Incorporated -3-
•
Any one or a combination of the following actions could be taken as a result
of or following the conference.
1. The Department could conclude the matter based upon its deterninati a
thlt the allegations are untrue, or if true, do not constitute grours
for revocation of your license;
2. The Department and you could enter into a stipulation for a mutually
agreed upon remedy or order; or
3. The Department could determine that the matter will be satisfactorily
resolved only by proceeding to a contested case hearing conducted
pursuant to the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act or such other or
further legal action as the Department deems necessary.
Please be advised that you may choose to be represented by an attorney at this
conference, although it is not required that you retain an attorney, that a
tape record may be made of the conference, and that anything you say may be
used as evidence against you should the matter proceed to a formal he-:ring at
a later time. The conference is designed to permit the Department to seek and
clarify information, to provide you an opportunity to clarify possible
misunderstanding, and to allow the Department and you to seek resolution and
remedy of an alleged problem without the necessity of instituting ;a formal
hearing.
MINNESOTA D PARTMENT OF HEALTH
6Y:
ar es B. Schneider, ., Chief
Environmental Field Services
CBS /lw
Dated this 27th Day of February, 1990
cc: Sheldon Christenson
Paul Zerby, Attorney General's Office
City Clerk, City of Hutchinson/
CCPIES.. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
tines: Offce
Licensee Section of Hotels, Resorts and Restaurants
D;st Office 717 Delaware St. S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
MOBILE HOME PARK AND /OR RECREATIONAL CAMPING AREA INSPECTION REPORT
Park or Camp Name aleZy Oluh `, /WrYZtCr /rI//!" Lic. No. Poste& 'reel Date#
Co. ��c zeo P.O. t 4Gr ; ilSePA Location N,WE z,cl"' ' tn•2 �'F �F( �
Licensee Address hr ss
No. Ind. R.0 Sites No. Occupied No. Dep. R.C. Sites No. Occupied
No. .'.1.H. Sites -Q / 4 1 No. Occupied /9
a. Locati�n
(j> Sewage Disposal
b. Careta er
h. Toilet, Bathing and
C. Spacing
Laundry Facilities
d. Animals
i. Incinerators
e. Water e ipply
i. Garbage and Refuse
f. F.umbing
(T.) Vermin Control
1.
Night Lighting
m.
Community Kitchen
n.
Bottled Gas
o.
Fuel Oil Systems
p.
Fire Protection
Q
Other
"& /L ; r /'�
D'st. R eceived By
D :st. Gf' c,.d P
NIHD 1 &7
PARAGRAPH: �i Cr�.r1 o - 8r 3 Ar9
(612) 587.5151
• WASH ffHUTCHINSON, ITY OF HUTCHINSON
INGTON AVENUE WEST
M /NN. 55350
April 18th, 1990
William Block
Hutch, Inc.
Country Club Terrace
Mobile Home Park
369 East Kellog Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Mr. Block:
The Hutchinson Planning Commission and this office is concerned over the
structural stability of the billboard sign at your Hutchinson Mobile Home
Park. It appears to be detached and potentially dangerous. Please correct
this immediately.
Also, the development of the park over the years has not adequately provided
the required buffering with plantings between the park and the abutting
residential zoning districts. Your cooperation in providing such this
summer vould be very much appreciated.
• Please respond in writing by May 1, 1990, of your intentions regarding the
above tvo matters.
Best regards,
Janes G. Marks
v
Building Official
JGM/pv
cc: Mark Bensen, Bldg. Insp.
Planning Commission
Mayor and City Council
Chief of Police
•
(612) 587 -5151
;va�cy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350
MEMO
MAY 16, 1990
TO:MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
----------------------------- ---------------------------------
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
--------------------------------
S'JBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT REPAIR
Attached is a memc from the Fire Department which tells of a major
break down of the City's Ladder Fire Truck.
The unforseen truck break down would require use of contingency
funds. The request would be for the required repairs to be made
and the money be taken from contingency.
•
�,77
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT 4P
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
May 17, 1990
Mayor Paul L Ackland
Hutchinson City Council Members
Re: 1976 Seagrave Ladder Truck
We have encountered unforseen problems with our 1976
Seagrave Ladder truck. It has locked up in a gear on
two (2) different occasions.
Hanson Truck Service has taken a look at the linkage and
has informed me that the problem is in the transmission.
Hanson Truck Service removed the transmission and estimates •
that repairs will be 53000.00.
I have instructed Hanson to order the parts and do what
is needed. The truck is useless until repaired.
At this time our budget will not cover this unforseen
expense.
Thank You.
Steven Schramm
ASSIST FIRE CHIEF
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
SS:rr
l J
9-T
(612) 587 -5151
lTY OF HUTCHINSON
VASH/NGTON AVENUE WEST
WH/NSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 17th, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council (J�
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering�� ')
RE: Street Light Relocation
Fahey Sales Agency on Main Street
Jim Fahey is in the process of remodeling his building on the west side of
Main Street, just south of the dam. For additional parking, and in order to
provide safer access to Main Street, Mr. Fahey would like to center a new
driveway access on the existing parking area, create angled parking, and make
the entrance one -way, away from Main Street. In order to do this, an existing
street light must be moved. Since another street light is across the street,
and banners are hung between the two, it would be preferable to move both
• light poles at the same time.
Butch Wentworth of Hutchinson Utilities provided the attached estimate of
$1,821.62 for the work, not including concrete removal and replacement. We
have proposed that Mr. Fahey pay for at least the required concrete pavement
removal and replacement, since most of the concrete work must be done to
center /relocate his driveway. It is not known who would pay for the Hutchinson
Utilities cost for relocation, or if the City even has funds to complete this
work.
Please inform me as to how you would prefer to proceed.
cc: Jim Fahey - Fahey Realty
Butch Wentworth, Hutchinson Utilities
i
9--u.
0
Hutchinson
Utilities
Commission
Hu!v N1,nnesG,
John Rodeberg
City Engineer
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear John,
May 15, 1990
The estimated costs to move street lights, both sides of the
street by Fahey Sales Agency, Inc., are as follows:
Material
30
feet
2" conduit @ $.51
$ 15.30
4
each
2" 90 degree sweeps @ $2.33 =
9.32
8
each
3/4" x 24" anchor bolts @ $24.00
(set of 4) 48.00
1
yard
concrete _
55.00
2
each
junction box @ $240.00 =
480.00
12
splices
600 volt secondary @ $2.00
24.00
$631.62
Labor
Truck time
Y tO -
$950.00
240.00
$1,821.62
•
It is my understanding that others will remove existing
sidewalks for moving of poles and replacement of same.
Sincerely,
E. "Bud" Daggett
President
Thomas B.Lyke
Vice President
Jerry Cornell
Secretary
Theodore Beatty
Commissioner
W.T. Richards
Commissioner
Financial Advisor
Clarence Kadrmas, P. E.
General Manager
Tel. 612/587 -4746
FAX 612/587-4721
Is
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
M. D. "Butch" Wentworth
Electric Superintendent
i s
9 -W-
1 STOMIS INC.
VIA CERTIFIED HAIL
�u T �Rir
Rc CaiPZ REVUESTED
May 15, 1990
Mayor Paul L. Ackland
ri.., of .....-1.
37 Washington Ave., Went
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE; Ualver of Contingency
Dear Mayor Ackland:
a 91• •9Q I10■ lnurnu )'K rLBQ — W - 4
...�•yNye�yfpwrnw "�.w.�,r.ry�'al.' -Mi {.
Please be advised that ShopKo Stores, Ine. hereby valve& Contingency 3.I. as
specified on Page 5 of that Site Purchase Agreement dated the 15th day of April, 1990,
by and between ShopxoStores, Inc. ( "guyar ") and the City of Hutchinson (
We will continue our efforts to satisfy the remainder of r.he r,, f. w. 4— & '.
rypropriate dates. "'° " " "° "1 wo
We thank you for your consideration and should you have any questions, please do not
hesitate to Call.
Yours truly,
(:;
-�.
Richer P. Evans
Vice President of Real Estate
RPE: J ir
cc.. r. Ag rry A. ^ .ddr30:., uSgiiil v
Colin Pietz, Esquire
Mark Nelson
\J
QN/�ovn a�ne�e .- _ - w ����niiw nN} • M.V. MUX ISOM
Of1E9P1 OIAV- rn600N9ar N90f -0010 • I11UNr (4!4) MTs$)1 • T:'.CX Tr32G7
9- v
MAY 15 1 ?0 11 24 KWPS
AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
SITE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
(Hutchinson, Minnesota)
THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1990
by and between SHOPKO STORES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, 700
Pilgrim Way, P.O. Box 19060 Green Bay, Wisconsin $4307 -9060
( "Buyer ") and the CITY OF HUTCHINSON, a Minneacta municipal
corporation, 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota
55350 ( "Seller ").
WHEREAS, the Buyer and seller entered into a Site
Purchase Agreement dated the 25th day of April, 1990, relating
to the purchase of an approximately 6.65 acre parcel of real
estate located in the City of Hutchinson, McLeod County,
Minnesota (the "Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, environmental investigation conducted by the
Buyer and Seller on the property which is covered by the
Agreement has revealed several areas of environmental concern
and potential exposure to environmental concern and potential
exposure to environmental liability of the Buyer if the Buyer
proceeds with the closing of the transaction contemplated by the
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Buyer and Seller have agreed to certain
matters to minimize the environmental liability exposure of the
Buyer in proceeding with the transaction;
NOW, THEREFOR$, in consideration of one Dollar (91.00),
the mutual covenant& herein contained, and other good and
0
05/13/9011 •
p 9 -V
MQYy15Z0�1_Tj 11 aM0Cr�w -a a &Ntj i Sg: i T ant ' 6 QT - Atow
P.V
MAY 13 '90 11125 KIPS
F.3
valuable consideration, the receipt, value and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged,
IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS, TO WIT:
1. MENTS To AGREEMENT The Agreement is hereby
amended as follows:
A. Extension of Environmental contingency The
date for the waiver or availing of the environmental
contingency in Paragraph 3.H. of the Agreement is
extended from June 13, 1990, until July 15, 1990.
B. Environmental Indemnity There is hereby
added to the Agreement an additional contingency on the
•
part of the Buyer to Paragraph 3. as follows:
"K. The receipt by the Buyer of an executed
indemnity agreement against environmental
liability in the form marked Exhibit "3" attached
hereto by the Seller, which form of agreement must
•
be approved by Super Vaiu Stores, inc."
C. Reimbursement for Environmental Investivative
Coate The Seller intends to seek reimbursement for up
to ninety percent (90 %) of all costs incurred by the
Seller in the investigation and remediation of
environmentally hazardous conditions on the Property
from the Petrofund administered.by the State of
Minnesota. The Seller agrees to include all costs and
expenses incurred by the Buyer in the Phase I and Phase
II environmental investigation of the Property in its
.2.
09 /15 /90
Mcv_ I S�E %B- d 1 jqAALM �3 P. 03
a
0 Naai ii 3n-L 06 - -A
MRY 15 '?Q 11=25 KWP'a
request for reimbursement from the petrofund and to
promptly reimburse Buyer with any monies received by
the seller arising from claims on behalf of the Buyer
against the petrofund.
D. Limitation of Coat of Environments
Investigation Notwithstanding the provisions of
Paragraph 5 Of the Agreement, it is agreed that Buyer
shall not be responsible for costs incurred in the
Phase Ii investigation of the Property in excess of
Twenty Thousand and no /100 Dollars ($20,000.00). Upon
Buyer furnishing the Seller of satisfactory evidence of
P. .4
the expenditure of this amount, seller agrees to
promptly reimburse Buyer for all additional costs
incurred in the Phase II environmental investigation of
the Property.
2. REAH'M MATION . All other terms, provisions and
conditions of the Agreement, as amended hereby, are hereby
ratified and approved and shall be and remain in full force and
effect.
IN WIT'NSSS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment No. 1 to Site Purchase Agreement to be executed as of
the day and year first above written.
SHOPKO STORES, INC.
8Y:
William J. Tyrrell, Presid
By!
1 am C. Hunt, Secretary
_3- OS/15/90c1
0
0
LJ
MCY 11°L TUE 11,q C3 P'
d MOQ� W --V a 10 04 N Z4 Eab _ L L 3rl 1. R -S i -I.N IJ
x 1 '?0 1125 KbPS
•
P.S
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
By:
Paul L. Ac an , Mayor
By:
Gary D. Plot2, Administrator
STATE OF WISCONSIN)
COUNTY OF BROWN
ss
Personally came before me this day of ,
1990, William J. Tyrrell, President of Shoo Stores, Inc., a
corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and to me known to be the
person who executed the foregoing instrument, and to me known to
be such President of said corporation and acknowledged that he
executed the foregoing instrument as such officer as the act of
said corporation, by its authority.
0
STATE OF
COUNTY O
F
MINNESOTA)
) as
HENNEPIN)
otary Public, W scone n
My Commission Expires:
Personally came before me this day of ,
1990, William C, Hunt, Secretary of S - o Stores, Inc., a
corporation duly organised and existing under and by virtue of
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and to me known to be such
person who executed the foregoing instrument, and to me known to
be such Secretary of said corporation and acknowledged that he
executed the foregoin instrument as such officer as the act of
said corporation, by its authority.
otary Public, Minnesota
My Commission Expires:
•
:env..: � e qq d 711F
.4- 05/15/90:1
qq P.05
I � a�w Q1 MOb 0b : T T ant 06 -S T -A"W
MAY 15 ' 11:26 IWPS P.6
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) •
)ss.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
Personally came before me this day of ,
1990, the above named Paul L. Ackland, Mayor, and Gary D. P otz,
Administrator of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, to be known
to be such persons who executed the foregoing instrument as such
Mayor and Administrator on behalf of said City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota.
Notary ublic, State of Minnesota
My Commission expires:
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY1
Colin D. Pietz, Esquire
Kelley, weber, Piett & Slater, S.C.
530 Jackson Street
Wausau, Wisconsin $4401
-5-
05/15/90:1
•
MAV_1¢ d YIIC
.7
I M 0 2 '� W
rh
'R Q 1 t`t�J aJ la
P 05
T ti t r � r. . r� <—
MAY 13 '30 11:30WPS P.13
. ENVIRONMENTAL INDEMNITY AGREMU4T
For and in consideration of one Dollar ($1.00), and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, value and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and to induce
Shopko Stores, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, to acquire the
parcel(s) of real estate described on 8xhibit "1" (the
"Property "), the undersigned Indemnitor hereby agrees to save,
indemnify and hold harmless Shopko Stores, Inc., its successors
and assigns from and against all actions, causes of action,
costs damages, demands, expenses, fees, fines, interest,
Judgments, liabilities, obligations, penalties, punitive damages
(including reasonable attorneys fees) arising out of, or in
connection with or resulting directly or indirectly from, or
• suffered, sustained or incurred by Shopko Stores, Inc., from any
"superfund" or other liability for investigation, cleanup,
containment, removal, remediation, or restoration work with
respect to any hazardous or toxic substances, materials or
waste, on or from the Property as of the date of closing of the
acquisition transaction, nor will it incur or be subjected to
any liability, cost or expense for the removal and disposal of
any asbestos, PCBs or underground storage tank from the
Property.
The term "hazardous or toxic substances, materials or
waste" means any substances, materials or waste that is, or may
become, toxic, ignitable, explosive, reactive or corrosive or
otherwise defined an hazardous and that in regulated as such by
•
-1- 05/15/90:1
MAY -11� JUE 'Ll :jjmoa�w .3 a�jNzt, bb: T T ani 9 ft. L ?st — Atiw
MAY 15 'Q3 11:30 KGFS
P.13
any unit or agency of local or state government having .
jurisdiction over the Property, or the United States government,
its agencies and instrumentalities, including, but not limited
to substances regulated by, under or pursuant to the Federal
Water pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. S 1321 et
seq.), the Federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. S 7401 at seq.), the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 as amended (42
U.S.C. S 6901 at seq.), the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act as amended (42 U.S.C. S
9601 at $eq.), the Toxic substance Control Act as amended (15
U.S.C. g 2601 at seq.), the Solid Waste Disposal Act as amended
(42 V.S.C. $ 6991 at 9eq.), petroleum or its derivatives and
products, asbestos or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
This indemnity agreement shall survive the closing of
the transaction and shall be a continuing obligation of the
undersigned Indemnitor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
Agreement this day of , 1990.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA
By:
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
Sy:
Gary D. p otz, Administrator
12- 05/15/90:1
r1
lJ
L�
MAY -15 -90 TUE 11:33 C3 P.13
Y T' d 1 1 3 M 0 Q' W '8 Cr 1 0 N Z1 t+ S b C T T 3 ft 1 0 6- S T-
m0y 15 'so 11:31 16PS P.14
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)as.
COUNTY OF MCL &OD )
Personally Came before me this day of ,
1990, the above named Paul L. Ackland, Mayor, and 0ary D. P=otz,
Administrator of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, to be known
to be such persons who executed the foregoing instrument as such
Mayor and Administrator on behalf of said City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota.
Notary Public, State - of Minnesota
My Commission expires:
n
U
•
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
Colin D. pieta, Esquire
Kelley, Weber, Pietm & Slater, S.C.
530 Jackson Street
Waas Wisconsin 544o1
-3-
05/15/9011
MAY -15 -90 fUE 11:34 G3 P.14
b T ' d 713moa�w 'e Q1oNb t1 S4 = T T a n _L 0 6 -5. T - Ar
DAVID B. ARNOLD
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL"
GARY D. McDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA E. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
RICHARD O. MCGEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSEI
May 18, 1990
ABNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587 -7575
TELECOPIER (812) 587 -4098
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment
ShopKo Project
Our File No. 3244 -89 -0031
Dear Gary:
OF COUNSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
CHARLES CLAYTON
GARY W. BECKER
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418
(812) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800- 343 -4545
TELECOPIER (812) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(012) 389 -2214
TELECOPIER (812) 389 -5508
I am enclosing the following documents all of which are relevant
to action that I will be requesting the City Council to take on
Tuesday evening, the most recent document of which was received
from ShopKo at approximately 2:30 P.M. on Friday (today).
1. Proposal of Twin City Testing dated May 3, 1990;
2. Supplemental proposal from Twin City Testing received and
dated May 18, 1990;
3. Proposal dated April 13, 1990 from STS Consultants, Ltd.
The Twin City Testing proposals must be viewed together. The
projected expense from the standpoint of Twin City Testing,
covering the entire Phase I and Phase II (grocery store) area is
$24,645 plus $14,100 for a total of $38,745. The STS proposal is
$47,316. It is, however, somewhat more limited in scope.
Twin City Testing reserves the right to come back to the City and
request additional work at additional expense.
Under the agreement with ShopKo, the City is exposed to costs in
excess of $20,000; however, the City is entitled to 90%
reimbursement of its costs after the City acquires a legal or
equitable interest in the property.
r- I
•
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
. May 18, 1990
Page 2
r1
U
It is the recommendation of ShopKo that the Phase II contract be
awarded to Twin City Testing because while the estimates are
approximately the same, the contract covers greater territory.
I do not disagree with their analysis in this regard.
We can discuss this matter further Tuesday night. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
AR LD & Mc WELL
n
a y Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosures
•
E 6q
ShopKo Stores, Inc.
Attn: Mr. James E. Oskey
700 Pilgrim Way
P. O. Box 19060
Green Bay, WI 54303 -9060
April 13, 1990
STS Proposal P -2894
Re: Phase II Environmental Reconnaissance for Property Transfer,
Proposed ShopKo Site in Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Oskey:
STS Consultants, Ltd. is pleased to submit this proposal for providing environmental ser-
vices in conjunction with the above - referenced project. We understand that our services
will consist of a Phase II environmental reconnaissance for property transfer (Phase II).
The proposed Phase II would include soil exploration and/or groundwater monitoring to
determine the extent of contamination encountered near Mike's Mobil and near the
electric -motor repair shop during the geotechnical soil exploration. A preliminary soil
exploration is also proposed along a historic railroad spur which traversed the property.
The Phase II scope of work is organized into three sub - scopes:
• Soil exploration /monitoring well installation at Mike's Mobil.
• Soil exploration with option for monitoring well installation near the electric repair
shop.
• Preliminary soil exploration along railroad siding.
The work plans and estimated costs for the three sub - scopes of work are outlined below.
Mike's Mobil - Soil samples from a depth of 9 to 11 feet obtained from a soil boring made
along the north side of Mike's Mobil during the geotechnical soil exploration produced HNU
photoionization meter readings of 200 to 300 parts per million (ppm). The HNU photoioni-
zation meter readings indicate the presence of volatile organic compounds in the soil. The
purpose of the proposed soil exploration in the vicinity of Mike's Mobil is to determine
the horizontal and vertical extent of contamination.
Six to eight soil borings would be made to a depth of approximately 15 to 20 feet in the
vicinity of Mike's Mobil, where site access permits, to identify contaminated soils.
Groundwater monitoring wells would be installed to define possible groundwater impacts and
groundwater flow direction. The monitoring wells would be constructed with black iron
riser pipe and stainless steel screens. Protector pipes would be installed around the
m cee.an.Mft ud
consw" Ery n"n
0
�y
0
o.
Z.
e
30.50 AmspOMS tans
MslnesOOb. MWW48Wa 55417
812.559.1900/Fu 812.550.4507
ShopKa Scores. inc.
STS Proposal P -2894
April 13, 1990
Page 2 �i!y
r,
• completed well and a locking protector pipe would be placed over the well. A report would
be prepared to document the results of the soil exploration and groundwater interpreta-
tions. Recommendations for further action at the Mike's Mobil site would also be made, if
necessary.
The estimated costs for the Mike's Mobil site are outlined below:
Cost Estimate - Soil Exploration/Groundwater
Monitoring - Mike's Mobil Site
Soil Exploration
Drilling
Field Geologist to observe and coordinate
drilling /clear utilities
HNU rental
Travel /per diem
Level D personal protection
Laboratory analysis of soil samples (5 -7 samples
at $250 /each - BTEX, total hydrocarbons)
• Monitoring Well Installation
Three monitoring wells at $2,500 - $2,700 each
Well development
Water sample analysis, 3 samples ® $150- 175 1sample
(MDH Method 465C)
Water level measurements
(one per month for three months)
R eport
Environmental Geologist
Project Engineer
Principal Engineer
Draftsman
Secretarial
•
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Project Subtotal
7% Environmental Insurance
PROJECT TOTAL
$ 1,800 - $ 2,400
$ 812 -$
1,160
$ 120-$
240
$ 300-$
500
$ 60-$
120
$ 1,250 - $ 1.750
$ 4,342 - $ 6,170
$ 7,500 - $ 8,100
$ 360-$ 450
$ 450-$ 525
$ 600-$ 750
$ 8,910 - $ 9,825
$
1,500 - $ 2,000
$
300-$
400
$
300-$
400
$
300-$
500
$
100-$
200
$ 2,500 - $ 3,500
$15,752 - $19,495
$ 1,103 -$ 1,365
$16,855 - $20,860
f
A
n
0
z
s
_1
O
is
Soopko Stores. inc.
STS Proposal P -2394
April 13, 1990
Page 3 R 6q
r,
Soil Exploration Near Electric Repair Shop - Soil samples obtained between a depth of 5 to
8 feet from a geotechnical soil boring made north of the electric repair shop produced HNU
photoionization meter readings of 9 to 10 ppm. A slight odor of fuel oil was observed from
the soil samples. A sheen was observed on a grab sample of groundwater obtained from the
soil boring. Abandoned railroad tracks were observed in the immediate vicinity of the soil
boring. No apparent source for a petroleum release such as riser pipes to an underground
storage tank riser pipes were observed. Therefore, a source(s) of the observed
contamination is not known at this time.
A soil exploration program with an option for monitoring well installation is proposed for
this site. The soil exploration program would concentrate on determining the horizontal
extent of contamination. Six to eight soil borings to a depth of 6 to 10 feet are pro-
posed. if soil borings encounter contamination, installation of groundwater monitoring
wells may be considered appropriate. The groundwater monitoring wells would be constructed
of black iron riser pipe and stainless steel screens. The monitoring wells would be pro-
tected by protector posts and a lockable protector pipe would be placed over the completed
monitoring well.
The estimated costs for the proposed work plan to determine the extent of contamination
near the electric repair shop is outlined below:
Soil Exploration Near Electric Repair Shop •
Soil Exploration
Drilling
Field Geologist to observe and coordinate
drilling /clear utilities
HNU rental
Travel /per diem
Level D personal protection
Laboratory analysis of soil samples (5 -7 samples
EPA 8240 VOC scan, $250 /sample)
Subtotal
Monitoring Well Installation
(May be optional based on results of soil exploration)
Three monitoring wells at $2,300 - $2,500 each
Well development
Water sample analysis. 3 samples ® $150 - 175 /sample
(MDH Method 465C)
$ 1,200 - $ 1,800
$ 640-$
900
$ 120 -$
180
$ 200-$
350
$ 60-$
120
$ 1.250 - $ 1.750
$ 3,470 - $ 5.100
$ 6,900 - $ 7,500
$ 360-$ 450
$ 450-$ 525
oitop.:o -Scores. inc.
STS Proposal P -2894
April 13, 1990
Page 4 P 7
• Water level measurements (three measurements over
three month time period; assumes performed in
conjunction with Mike's Mobil project) $ 100-$ 150
Additional report preparation for groundwater interpretations $ 800 _$ 1.000
Subtotal $ 8,610 - $ 9,625
Report
Environmental Geologist
$
1,250 - $
1,750
Project Engineer
$
200-$
300
Principal Engineer
$
200-$
300
Draftsman
$
200-$
400
Secretarial
$
100-$
200
Subtotal $ 1,950 - $ 2,950
Project Subtotal $14,030 - $17,675
7% Environmental Insurance $ 982 -$ 1,237
PROJECT TOTAL $15,012 - $18,912
• Preliminary Soil Exploration Along Railroad Siding - Loading, unloading and long -term
storage of railroad cars may have occurred on the railroad siding which entered the
proposed ShopKo property on the east and traversed the property to service the cold storage
building near the northwest comer of the site. A soil exploration program using a hand
operated bucket auger is proposed along the length of the railroad siding to determine
potential impacts from the historic railroad operation. Eight to ten auger borings, each 4
to 6 feet in depth, are proposed. Composite soil samples would be obtained for laboratory
analysis. Soil samples would be selected for laboratory analysis based on screening with a
PID meter and physical observations. The type(s) of laboratory analyses cannot be iden-
tified at this time. However, analyses for petroleum constituents, pesticides, creosote
products or other inorganic and organic compounds tray be anticipated.
An estimate for the soil exploration and chemical analysis is provided below. Please
understand that the wide range of estimated costs is necessary because the scope of labora-
tory analyses is unknown at this time.
Estimated Cost for Soil
Exploration Along Railroad Siding
Soil Exploration
Field Geologist to obtain soil samples
$
350 - $
450
HNU rental
$
120-$
180
• Travel /per diem
$
200-$
350
Level D personal protection
$
60-$
120
Subtotal $
730-$
1,100
V
S
gF
C
o�
s;
0
Sitop.(u Scores. inc.
STS Proposal P -2894
April 13, 1990
Page 5
Laboratory Analvsis of Soil Samples
Estimate - specific analyses to be determined
Report
Environmental Geologist
Project Engineer
Principal Engineer
Draftsman
Secretarial
Subtotal
Project Subtotal
7% Environmental Insurance
PROJECT TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
$ 1,500 - $ 2.500
$
1.500 - $
2.000
$
300 -$
400
$
300-$
400
$
250-$
400
$
150-$
250
$ 2,500 - $ 3,450
$ 4,730 - $ 7,050
$ 33 l - $ 494
$ 5,061 - $ 7,544
$36,928 - $47,316
The grand total estimate reflects estimated costs for performing all items proposed in the
work plans. A cost reduction may be achieved if certain portions of the work plan. such as
monitoring wells at the electric repair shop site, are not performed. The proposed work
plans represent our opinion of environmental exploration needed for the site based on the
results of the geotechnical soil exploration and Phase I environmental reconnaissance
information collected to date for the site.
Tetras and Conditions
We propose to provide these services in accordance with the Fee Schedule. General and
Supplemental Conditions attached to this proposal which are expressly incorporated into,
and are an integral part of, our contract for professional services.
It must be recognized that latent underground pollution of a non - hazardous or hazardous
nature may be discovered in performance of an environmental reconnaissance. The discovery
may require the buyer /seller under federal and state regulations to undertake remedial
measures, particularly if reportable quantities are encountered. STS considers the respon-
sibility for reporting any results and subsequent clean-up measures to rest with the seller
and /or tenant. STS will not report the results of the reconnaissance to parties other than
that with which we have contracted unless. in our opinion, there is an imminent health or
safety risk involved.
•
•
SnopKo Stores. Inc.
STS Proposal P -2394
April 13, 1990
Page 6 Pi �
r`
• Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by having an authorized representative of
your firm execute one copy and return it to the undersigned. If we are given verbal or
written notification to proceed. without first receiving a signed copy of our proposal, it
will be mutually understood that both of us will, nonetheless, be contractually bound by
the proposal. even in the absence of written acceptance by you. In any event. a signed
copy of this proposal will need to be returned to STS before a written report can be sub-
mitted.
Please note that this authorization is based on providing relatively limited services as
discussed above. If more extensive or long -tern services are required, particularly those
services with significant engineering involvement, a more detailed proposal could be devel-
oped. Such a proposal would detail the specific scope of services to be provided by STS
for this project.
Your acceptance of our proposal confirms that the terms and conditions are understood,
including payment to STS Consultants, Ltd. upon receipt of the invoice, unless specifically
arranged otherwise in writing. Of course, should you wish to discuss the terms. condi-
tions, and provisions of our proposal, we would be pleased to do so at your earliest con-
venience.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions regard-
ing our involvement with this project, or if we may be of further service, please contact
us at 612/559 -1900 or 1/800/426 -3639. We look forward to assisting you on this project.
Very truly yours,
STS CONSULTANTS, LTD.
Gary J. Rathbun
Soil Scientist
GJR/dn
Encs.: STS General Conditions
STS Supplemental Conditions
STS Fee Schedule
JG�vertoom, P.E.
Principal Engineer
,
u
ACCEPTED:
DATE
FIRM
0
z
4
ti
s
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TITLE
• Copyright P -2394, STS Consultants, Ltd., April. 1990
-•
05i23il99. 17136 FROM
May 3, 1990
Shopko Stores Inc.
Attn: Mr. James Oskey
P.O. Box 19060
Green Hay, WI 54307 -9060
Subj: Cast Estimate/Proposal
Subsurface Environmental Assessment
Proposed Sbopko Development
Main Street
Hutcbinson, Minnesota
#4410 90 -4528
Dear Mr. Oskey:
I V"XIM,
Twin City Testing Corporation (TCT) is pleased to respond to your request for an environmental
assessment The purpose of this study is to assess the potential for, or presence o[, environmental
liabilitics associated with contaminated soil or groundwater from several potential sources of
hazardous material or wastes that could impact the property.
Based on our review of STS Consultants Ltd. (STS) report entitled "Phase I Environmental •
Reconn aissance for Property Trawfer" provided by Shoplao, nine area of concern were noted.
However, based on our earlier site r000nnaissance performed prior to submitting a cast estimate
for a Phase I, one area appears to have been omitted A listing of all ten locations, and an
approximation of the number/depth of borings anticipated at these locations is as follows:
A -The upper soil sample will also be used to assess railroad spur impact
a
t
Y
Anticipated Depth,
Location
Boring
Each*
1.
Mike's Mobtk
'
2.
Electric Motor Co.
5A
2x5'
3.
Town and Country Tyre-
1
25'
near interior sump
4.
Catquest-
1
5'
near battery storage
S.
Railroad spur
2
S
6.
Auto repair shop-
1
S
stained soil
7.
Residence with past odors in basement
1
25'
8.
Municipal parking lot -gas odors
1
25'
9.
Soil stain near Triad Auto Systems
1B
25'
10.
Soil stain near vacant car dealership
1B
25'
A -The upper soil sample will also be used to assess railroad spur impact
a
t
Y
0
Shopko Stores Inc.
May 3, 1990
Page Two
B -These two borings will be extended to aid in the assessment of off -site impacts.
•The 25' depth assumes groundwater is at this depth. Actual conditions may shorten or lengthen
the deeper borings.
Please note our estimate includes four additional borings to assist in defining extensive areas of
contamination
All soil samples will be screened with a portable photoionlzation detector for evidence of
contamination. We propose analyzing one sample from the area of the former garage for potential
contaminants in the laboratory in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MpCA)
guidelines. Tire necessity of analyzing additional samples will be determined based on the field
observations and screening.
. The proposed scope of work should give an indication of the gross presence or absence of soil
contamination associated with the above concemL Additional information may become available
which may indicate fewer or more borings arc necessary. It should be noted that additional work
may be required to determine sources of existing contamination, evaluate the degree or extent of
contamination if present, evaluate feasible alternative response actions, provide engineering
estimates of cleanup costs, or evaluate anticipated regulatory agency responsec.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work we propose to perform at this project consists of the following items
Phase II - Envitonmeatal
1. Collecting and evaluating background information in order to develop a detailed work plan
and a site safety plan, and to interpret results.
2. Drilling 17 standard penetration soil borings up to 25 foot below grade.
3. Drilling 4 standard penetration soil borings up to 5 feet below grade.
4. Screening soils in t-e field and in the laboratory with an hNu Model 101 photoionization
detector for evidence of volatile organic compound contamination.
5. Analyzing samples for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), base ncutral/acid extractables
B NAs), total hydrocarbons as gasoline and fud oil, benzcnekthylbenzene /toluene/xylenes,
( ETX), total metal content, PCBs, oil and grease, and/or total lead content.
95/93/199. 17137 FROM
Shopko Stores Inc.
May 3, 1990
page Three
TO 14141967194
P.03
6. Preparing an em+ironmental report including logs of soil borings, results of the chemical
analyses, and opinions and recommendations regarding environmental liabilities.
Areas potentially impacted by gasoline, waste oil and/or fuel oil will be analyzed for BETX, total
hydrocarbons as gasoline and fuel oil, lead, PCBs, and oil and grease.
Unknown petroleum stains and sumps will be analyzed for BNAs, Vtxs, PCBs, and total metal
content. Battery storage areas will be analyzed for total metal content.
The railroad track spur soil will be analyzed for BNAs, BET-K, additional hydrocarbons as gasoline
and fuel oil.
The soil adjacent to the residence with past unidentified odors will be analyzed for VOCs.
Th:9) :71k :ft'1
Report will include logs of soil borings, results of soil screening, and opinions and recommendations
regarding further work Conclusions and recommendations will be based upon goologic conditions,
results of soil screening, and visual/olfactory evidence of contamination. Conclusions relative to
eavironmental liabilities will be presented.
1 _ t , 1111 Vr
We have visited the site in order to evaluate the topographic and cultural setting. This proposal
will be considered the work plan.
The drill rig and all downhole tools will be steam cleaned before mobilization to the site. Soil
cuttings adll be thin - spread on- site. The boreholes will be 6W with neat cement grout upon
completion. The split barrel sampler w®1 be washed with a biodegradable low - phosphate detergent
solution and rinsed with potable water prior to collecting each sample. Wash and rinse water will
be disposed of on-site. 4
Soil sampling will be done in accordance with ASTM01586.84. Using this procedure, a Y O.D.
split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30". After an initial set
of 6", the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12" is known as the
penetration resistance or N value. The N value is an index of the relative density of cohesioaless
soils and the consistency of cohesive soils.
11
•
Shopko Stores Inc.
• May 3, 1990
Page Four
Samples will be collected at 2 -1/2 or S foot intervals in the field at the time of dnlling. Soil
samples for chemical analyses will be collected in
delivered directly to the lab for chemical analysis laboratory- preparrd sample containers and
As the samples are obtained in the field, they will be visually and manually classified in accordant e
with ASTM:D2487 -W and D2488. Representative portions of the sample wi ed
ll then be return
to the laboratory fot further examination and for verification of the field classification. Logs of the
borings indicating the depth and identification of the various strata, the N value, water level
information, contaminant observations, and pertinent information regarding the method of
- maintaining and advancing the drill holes will be attached
Soils will be screened in the field for the presence of organic vapor: using an hNu Mo ] 101
de
photoioaization detector equipped with a 102 eV lamp and calibrated for direct reading in parts
per million (ppm) volumed per volume of benzene Fresh soil surfaces sn be exposed
probe immediately placed within one to two �hes of the soil surface, and the hNu
One sample will be collected in a clean soil jar at each sampling interval at the tim
The jar w e of drilling.
elt be covered with a sheet of clean aluminum f
• will be inverted for transport to the lab. oil and screw cap tightly apps. The j
In the lab, the jar will be warmed to room temperature and ri
ghtedL Each jar will be agitated for
10 seconds, allowed to "rest' fora
be removed and foil seats approximately 10 minutes, and agitated again. The screw }ids w ill
probe and the highest meter recorded as the air hea ds P ace with the instrument
after insertion ] pace concentration 2 to 5 seconds
Total organic vapors win be determined ,sing an hNu model Photoiomzation detector with a 10.2
eV lamp. The hNu is calibrated in parts per million volume per volume of benzene.
As discussed with the client, soil samples will be analyzed for potential contaminants under this
proPosat. The following USEPA Methods published in the EPA Document tY60Q/4 -70 020, entitled
*EPA Meth for Chemic Analysis of Water and Wastes,' dated March 19M, would be used:
0
Shopko Stores Inc.
May 3, 1990
Page Five
The exact number and type of analyses will be influenced by actual field conditions. If actual •
conditions warrant additional tests, the work scope and costs will be discussed and performed only
after additional authorization.
it s
Phase 11 - Envnonmental
Dolling can be scheduled within 10 working days following authorization. The chemical analysis
Of soil samples wall require appro cimately 15 working days following dulling completion. Rush
analysis is available for an additional fee; please contact us immediately if rush analysis is desired.
Preparation of the environmcatai report will require an additional 10 working days beyond the date
of chemical analysis completion.
Wo. j a u
The scope of our work listed in this plan will be performed on a Time and Materials basis, based
on our 1990 "Schedule of Fees," a copy of which is available upon request The cost estimate for
completing the project is shown below.
Phase U - Environmental
Drilling 21 to 25 standard penetration soil borings, 58000.00 to $10000.00 •
mobilization, grouting, utility clearance
Turnaround Time
Co mpgun d
Method
( rte¢ dan)
Volatile Organic Compounds
GC Method 4650
15 -20
Metals
EPA 600/4 -79-M for
15-20
individual listing
PCBs
Method 608
15-20
Total Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
Method Modified SW-846 #8200
15 -20
Total Hydrocarbons as Fuel Oil
Method Modified SW.846
15-20
#8000 & 3540
Oil and Grease
Method 41&1
15.20
BETX
Method Modified SW-i46
15-20
Base Neutral/Acid
Modified EPA 625
15.20
The exact number and type of analyses will be influenced by actual field conditions. If actual •
conditions warrant additional tests, the work scope and costs will be discussed and performed only
after additional authorization.
it s
Phase 11 - Envnonmental
Dolling can be scheduled within 10 working days following authorization. The chemical analysis
Of soil samples wall require appro cimately 15 working days following dulling completion. Rush
analysis is available for an additional fee; please contact us immediately if rush analysis is desired.
Preparation of the environmcatai report will require an additional 10 working days beyond the date
of chemical analysis completion.
Wo. j a u
The scope of our work listed in this plan will be performed on a Time and Materials basis, based
on our 1990 "Schedule of Fees," a copy of which is available upon request The cost estimate for
completing the project is shown below.
Phase U - Environmental
Drilling 21 to 25 standard penetration soil borings, 58000.00 to $10000.00 •
mobilization, grouting, utility clearance
-'-* WfSi1999 1794t FROM
is Shoplro Stores Inc.
May 3, 1990
Page Sur
TO 14144967180 - F'."rp'MmW- -Vqq
Environmental Technician for collecting $3000.00 to $3500.00
and screening soil samplM utility clearance
Sample Containers dt Equipment Rental $ 600.00 to S 800.00
Chemical Anab=
VOCS
3 @ $150
$1800.00
Oil 8r Grease
3 @ S 70
$ 3300.00
PCBs
3 @ $125
$ 00.00
Metals
5 @ S270
$1150.00
Fuel
3 @ $115
$1320.00
BETX, MTBE
BNAs
3 @ $ 95
3 @ $400
900.
$ 00
$ 900 .00
Ind
5 @ S 35
$ 173.00
Project Management
$1000.00 to $1500.00
•
Reporting
S 800.00 to $1000.00
Estimated Total - Phase II - Environmental
$21245.00 to $24645.00
I � 3T/_ :Pit' r1
OLccating underground utilities on-slte is the responsibility of the client and/or property owner. We
will, however, assist you in the location of utilities by contacting the public utility agencies to have
them locate where their respective utilities enter the project sit— If accurate locations of
underground utilities cannot be determined, borings in such areas may be shifted substantially or
deleted to reduce the possibility of damage. N the property owner cannot determine the locations
Of the on -site utilities 24 hours prior to the onset of drilling, we will delay work until the
information is provided to us.
Please note the client is responsible for informing TCT of any hazardous or potentially hazardous
materials which TCT may sample as part of this work effort Should TCT recover samplea or the
client submit samples to TCT which contain hazardous or potentially hazardous materials, such
samples shall remain the property of the client who will be ultimately responsible for proper
disposal. All samples obtained by or submitted to TCT will be returned to the client for proper
• disposal within thirty (30) days of receipt of analytical results. Your signature on this proposal
acknowledges your acceptance of this responsibility.
Shopka Stores Inc.
May 3, 1990
Page Seven
STANDARD OF CARE
Our efforts will be directed at performing the work and accomplishing the objectives defined Our
estimated cost and performance schedule are based on our judgement of the requirements known
to us at the time of this proposal. Succcessful completion within cast and schedule limits can be
influenced, favorably or adversely, by changes in work scope and schedules as dictated by your
needs and presently unforeseen circumstances. We will notify you in advance if schedule or costs
are expected to exceed the estimate. In such events, you may wish to (1) authorize additional funds
LO complete the work as originally defined, (2) redefine the scope of work in order to fit the
remaining funds, or (3) request that work be stopped at a specific expenditure level If option (3)
is chosen, we will turn over such data, results, and materials completed at the authorized level
Without further obligation or liability to either party except for payment for work performed,
ACCEPTANCE
Please indicate your acceptance of this proposal by signing the enclosed copies of our Standard
Form of Agreement to Engage Services (G -125 7M) and rcturninII both signed a men�U to us. •
We will sign both copies and return one to you for your records- We appreciate the
Opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact us at 612/649 -55a
Cordially,
David A. Luick, P.E.
Supervisor/Senior Project Manager
Environmental Site Assessment
Lisa AshbachSladek
Geologist/Project Manager
Environmental Site Assessment
DAL/IA&cw
SIN VLNU
714144`Jb'lltad P.01
•
•
May i8, 1990
Shopko Stour Inc
Attn: Mr. James Oakcy
P.O. &u 19080
Omen Bay, WI 54307.9060
Subj: Cast Estimate/proposal
Monitoring Well lutallation
Proposed Shopko D1walopment
Main Street
Hutchinson, h inne Iota
# 90.4328
Dear Mr. Oaker
moutTEL.#r i#44- SS'S
ToFAX -1 7 1RC
FRO �q ✓i A Chu c k Tr' T_
To kA
DATE
0 PAGES
M GYrn�eN ORq 11�MI �+
Vdl�b�
r�tir pr_ ,
Twin City Testing Corporation ('I - T) is pleased to respond to your request for as tal
liabilities sc" t- nopurpose of this study is to assess the potential for, or presence of, t�onaleatal
associated with °nntaminated groundwater. Based on our review of STS Cbnsultanta Ltd.
(M) report provided by Sbopko, and our site
groundwater contamination exists on and around Mike's reconnaissance, tatio n. other emu my
requite well installation on the site may be identified should the work identified in our May g, 19M
lrOPOW be perfOrMed prior to or in concert with the work identified b
We as corm dy ��pa a d 0th finu of b located
feet below � arm of Mike's Mobile will be completed
depending on the extent of contamination observed during he i ll 11 be bald ut am,
An soil samples wilt be screened with a portable photoionizatioo detector for evkkaoe of
contamination. We propose analyzing one water sample from each well for potential contaminants
le the laboratory i accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) &Welinq, The
necessity of analysing additional samples will be determined based on the Gold observations and
screenin
The proposed scope of work should give an indication of the gross presence or able= of
groundwater contamination associated with the above concerns. Additional i,Iformttion may become
available which may indicate fewer or more boring ijs are necessary. It anti be gored that
additional work may be required to determine sources of ejdsting contamination, evaluate the
degree or extent of contamination if present, evaluate feasible alternative response acti^ provide
leering estimates of cleanup coats, or evaluate anticipated regulatory agavAy respoe
•
I-KU'OICLL
Ilu" DNUVKU DIK ILMU
TO 914144967la0 P.OY
• Shopko Stores Inc.
May 18, 1990
Page 2
SOOP13 OF WORX
The scope of work we Propose to perform at this project consists of the following it*=:
L Collecting and evaluating background information in order to develop a detailed work plan
and a site safety plan, and to interpret results.
2 Drilling up to five standard penetration soil borings up to 30 feet below grade, and
completing thean as groundwater monitoring wells.
3 - Senxning soil in the Held and in the laboratory with an hNu Model 101 pbotolonlUtion
detector for evidence of volatile organic compound contamination.
4. Analysing water tot volatile organic compounds, total hydrocarbons as gesollne and fuel
oil, MIMP, and total lead metal content.
3, Preparing an environmental report including lops of soil borings, monitMgg well
construction kV, results of the chemical analyses, and opinions and mornmend&dons
• regarding environmental liabilities and remedial alternatives.
REIPORMNG
Report Will include logs of soil borings and monitoring wells, results of toll screening end chemical
analyse, and opinions and recommendations regarding further work. OnnrJusioos and
nxontmendatioas will be based upon geologic conditions, results of chemical analyses, and
viguIV0lf8ct0ry evidence of contamination. Conclusions relative to environmental Uabilltlos and
remedial altemativM if necessary, will be presented,
1 .. 1 '11' • * 0-
We have visited the site in order to evaluate the topographic and cultural setting. Tbig propWA
Will be considered the work plan.
Tits drill rig and all downhole tools will be steam cleaned before mob,Tiution to the site. Soil
cutting will W thin - spread on4itc. The boreholeg not completed as monitoring wails Will be Mled
with neat ceamt grout upon completion. The split barrel sampler w111 be washed with a
biodegradable low-phosphate detergent Solution and rinsed with potable water prior to Collecting
each sample. Wash and rinse water will be disposed of on-siW
•
.w 4 L 1 l.MUnWL
Sbopko Stores Inc.
May 1S, 1990
Pagc 3
Soil sampling will be done in accordance with ASTM.D1586-84. Using this procedure, a 2" O.D.
split barrel sampler is driven into the soil by a 140 pound weight falling 30". After an Initial set
of 6", the number of blows required to drive the sampler an additional 12" is (mown as the
penetration resistance or N value. The N value is an index of the relative density of cohesfonleas
soils and the Wwistenry of cohesive soils.
Samples will be collected at 2.12 or S foot intervals in the field at the time of drilling. Sol]
samples for chemical analyses will be oollected in laboratory-prepared sample c°ntainers and
delivered directly to the lab for chemical analysis,
As the samples are obtained in the field, they will be v and manual c
with ASTMO2497,85 and D218& Re resentatim f 13 l acs]fied In accordance
to the laboratory or further p p °f the sampes Will then be returned
rY examination and for verification of the field olassi&ation. Logs of the
borings Indicating the depth and identification of the various strata, the N value, water level
information, oontaminsnt observations, and pertinent information regarding the method of
maintaining and advancing the drill holes will be attached.
0
Soils will be screened in the field for the presence of organic vapors using an hNu Mod parts
•
photoiotlizatbn detector equipped with a 10.2 eV lamp and cahbrated for direct reading in
per million (PPM) volume per volume of benzene. Fresh soil surfaces will be exposed and the bNu
Probe immediately placed within one to two inches of the sog surface
One sample will be collected in a clean soil jar at each sampling interval at the time illing,
of dr
The jar will be covered with a sheet of clean aluminum W and acre t ca p tightly applied. The jar
Will be inverted for transport to the lab.
In the lab, the jar will be warmed to room temperature and righted. Each Jar will be agitated for
10 seconds, &Bowed to "rest" for approximately 10 minutes, and agitated again, The strew lids wilt
be removed and foil seals exposed. The foil seal will be Tneldl, punctured with the instrnmeat
probe and the higbeat meter response recorded as the Jar headspace oollcenhation 2 to 3 seoonds
after instrtiom
Total organic vapors will be deuxmined using an hNu model pbotoioniation detector with a 10.2
eV lamp. The hNu is calibrated in parts Per million volume per volume of beaseno,
The monitoring welis w ill be developed using a submersible pump, a hand pump or a bottom
loading Teflon bailer and/or a surge block. The well will be developed to remove at a minimum
a volume equal to the amount of fluid added to the well during the drilling and imtailatlon process.
Typically, at least 10 water column volumes will be removed from the well and the well will be
surged during the developnreot Process to facilitate removal of theca.
TO 9 1414496718e P.03
•
'90 03,18 12377
• �•
AI-.M 1.1%% 1 TCT CROt WELL
• Sbopko Stotts Inc.
May 18, 1990
Page 4
E 414 496 7180 SXOPKO STR PLHG
TO 914144967180 P,04
Monitoring wells wnl be installed in selected borings in a moaner consistent with providing
representative water samples from a given depth and location. Monitoring wells well be comtructod
and installed el shown on the attached 'Monitoring Well Specificatione data shcets, unkas site
oonditiotls require modifications, All monitoring wall materials will be cleaned and wrapped prior
to transport to the sits
As discussed with the client, soil samples win be analyzed for potential contaminants under
this
proposal The follotviag USEPA Methods published in the $PA Document #6M4 -70 -020, entitled
'EPA Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, dated March 1983, would be used
Turnaround Time
0
Lead
Total Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
Total Hydrocarbons as Fuel On
HET7C, MTBE
EPA 600/4 - 79.020 for
individual listing
Method Modified SW-W IR8200
Method Modified SW-846
*WW & 3340
Method Modified SW4 46
13.20
15-20
15.20
15 -20
7110 exact number and type of analyses will be iaflueeeed
co by actual field conditions If u>ctu4l
er a dds warrant additional tests the work scope and costs will be discussed and performed only
after additional authorization.
1 1" `M•IJ�
DniMing can be scheduled appratdmately 7 to 10 working days following authorization.
will be needed to allow the Mmnesota Department of Health to approve well ittaWatiaa IJI; T1tis time
th s
13 work ing daps prior days work i
in g d on The ehemigll analysis of water sarnpias will require
is work follow completion. Rush analysis bt tivaitrble for an addigo>sel f�
Plea" contact us immediately if rush analysis is desired. Preparation of the enwhvnmenw report
will require an additional 10 working days beyond the date of chemical aa&b%ja annipletkin.
Should our work be limited to moWkw'ag well installation, field activities should take 3 to 5 days.
The field work identified in our wher proposal would take approximately S days to Wmpk:tL If
the two work soopu are combined, the total field work should be compktod in all 8
to 10 wonting days, pt�oadmatciy
04
n
U
Shopko Stores Imo.
May 18, 1990
Page 5
i" .�
M 9 14144967180 P.04
COST ES` U"TE
The icope of c w' work listed in this plan will be performed on a Time and Materials basis, based
on our 1990 'Schedule of Fees," a cop of which ii available upon request. The cost estimate for
completing the Proka is shown below.
Drilling 5 standard penetration son borings,
construction of monitoring wells, $8400.00 to $ 8600.00
mobilization, grouting, ua7ity clearance
Environmental Techniclan for collecting
and scr=11ag so0 and water samples S 1800.00 to !2000.00
Sample Containers & Equipmeat Rental
i 400.00 to s 600.00
Lead
Fuel on S OS110 S 30MM
BET/-, MT88 5 @ i90 $ 550.00
$450.00
Project Managtment/Reporting
S 1400.00 to S 1600.00
Fsdmated ToW
$13MW to 8141WM
in that a savings of aPP�mately $MO to 52000 abould be realised if the work identlBed
Proposals is done concurrently.
LD41T of LU18I1,i V
Lt Mg u0derVW'md utili ties on -site is the responsibility of the client and/or ptvpetty OWDM We
will, however, assist you in the location of utilities by contacting the public utility agenein to have
them locate whew ffidr respective utilities enter the projaet site. If accurate locations of
uadergrouad utilities cannot be determined, borings is such areas may be shiftod subs or
deleted to reduce the Possibility of damage taotia>ty
lif the property owner cannot determine the bcatioffi
of the on-ate utilities 24 hours prior to the onset of
information is provided to m dig, wr Will delay work until the
0
is
Is
PRY - 18 -1990 1140 FROM TCT aZX.E - U.
. Shopko Stores Inc.
May 38, 1990
Page 6
•
TO 914144957180 PAS
Please note the client is responsible for informing TCT of any hazardous or potentisl}y hazardous
materials which TC'r may sample as part of this work effort, Should TCT recover samples or the
client submit Samples to TCr which contain hazardous or potentially hazardous materiels, Such
Samples shall remain the property of the c5ent who will be ultimately responsible for proper
disposal. All samples obtained by or submitted to TCT will be returned to the client for proper
disposal within thirty (30) days of receipt of analytical results. Your signature on this propow
acknowledges your acceptance of this responsibility.
op CARE
out efforts will be directed at performing the work and sccomplishing the objectrves defined, our
estimated cost and performance schedule are based on our judgement of the requirements known
to us at the time of this proposal. Successful cwmplation within cost and schedule limits can be
Influenced, favorably or adversely, by changes in work scope and schedules as dictated by your
needs and presently unforeseen circumstances. We will notify you in advance If schodtele or casts
are ccpected to exceed the estimate. In such events, you may wish to (1) authorize additional funda
to Complete the work as originally defined, (2) todefine the scope of work in order to tit the
remaining funds, of (3) request that work be stopped at a specifle expenditure level. if option (3)
is chosen, we will turn over such data, results, and materials completed at the authorized level
without further obligation or liability to either party except for payment for work performed.
AC7CM?TANC6
Please indicate your acceceptanx of this Proposal by signing the enclosed ies of our Standard
Form of Agreement to Engage Services (0-125 7A8) and �
for to tee
We will 'ben Sign both copies and return one to you
OPPort�y to submit this year t you this proj eeiase the
prx>jeosal and look fo'vwrd to working with you on this project,
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact us at 612164944.
Cordially.
David A Luick, P.E
Supetvfaor/5enior Project Manager
Envitonmental Site Assessment
Lisa AshbachSledek
Cleologist/project Manager
Environmental Site Assessment
DAULA9,/ew
•
ARNOLD & MGDOWELL
DAVID B. ARNOLD
ATTORNEYS AT l.AW
or wvNSEL
CHARLES R. OARNICBAEi"
Our File No. 3244 -89 -0031
Dear Colin:
101 PARK PLACE
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
GARY
I have reviewed the Amendment No. 1 to the Site Purchase Agreement
•
STEVEN
STEVEN N A. . " ANDE DE 850N
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 65350
CHABLES CLAYTON
First, as to the issue of reimbursement for environmental
GARY W. BECKER
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
(812)587.7575
week when I discussed this matter with Mark Nelson and Jim Oskey.
STEVEN S. ROOF
The City would be happy to coordinate any attempt to recover all
5801 CEDAR I ROAD
LAURA E. PBETLAND
TELECOPIEB (812) 587 - W"
N
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 35418
DAVID A. BRUROOEMANN
City. In my meeting with the MPCA last week, which was otherwise
(812) 545 -0000
PAUL D. DOVE
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
MN TOLL FREE 800.343 4545
O. BARRY ANDERSON
TELECOPIEB (012) 843 -1703
JOSEPH N. PAIEM ENT
certainly seem to me to be appropriate that ShopKo would be
JAMES UTLEY
eligible as well. Frankly, this question did not seem to have
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
structure the expense issue relative to the environmental
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
RICHARD O. McOEE
(812)380 -2214
TIMOTHY W. PAPINSEI
is possible. This might, for example, have the effect of delaying
TELECOPIER (812) 380 -5508
May 17, 1990
will need to get that information from the Petro Fund and Robin
Mr. Colin Pietz
Kelley, Weber, Pietz &
Slater, S. C.
530 Jackson Street
Warsaw, Wisconsin 54401
Re: Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment
ShopKo Project
Our File No. 3244 -89 -0031
Dear Colin:
•
I have reviewed the Amendment No. 1 to the Site Purchase Agreement
and I have no specific changes.
I do wish to clarify a couple of matters, however.
First, as to the issue of reimbursement for environmental
investigative costs, my position remains the same as it was last
week when I discussed this matter with Mark Nelson and Jim Oskey.
The City would be happy to coordinate any attempt to recover all
of the environmental investigative costs from the Petro Fund,
regardless of whether those costs were incurred by ShopKo or the
City. In my meeting with the MPCA last week, which was otherwise
very favorable, the point was made that it is probable that only
the City as the owner of the property will be eligible for
reimbursement. On the other hand, ShopKo will ultimately be the
owner of the site when the project is completed and it would
certainly seem to me to be appropriate that ShopKo would be
eligible as well. Frankly, this question did not seem to have
occurred to anyone and there was some confusion as to whether or
not ShopKo is eligible. It is possible that we may need to
structure the expense issue relative to the environmental
investigative costs differently in order to make certain that full
compliance with state laws is achieved and maximum reimbursement
is possible. This might, for example, have the effect of delaying
ShopKo's liability for the investigative costs. Unfortunately, we
will need to get that information from the Petro Fund and Robin
•
* CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION 9- v.
Mr. Colin Pietz
• May 17, 1990
Page 2
Hanson, who is the contact person at the Petro Fund, has not yet
responded to my inquiry. For the time being, I think we can leave
Amendment No. 1 in its current form as any change that will need
to be made regarding this issue will almost certainly be favorable
to ShopKo and as already indicated, the City intends to cooperate
in every manner possible.
Second, I have discussed the question of the right of first refusal
with Mark Nelson. I have told him that I am not comfortable with
the language of the right of first refusal for both political and
practical reasons. Most importantly, I want to be very clear that
it is the intention of the City to get the best possible deal on
Phase II, if Phase II ever develops. For that reason, if no other,
I think you can be assured that Super Valu need not be concerned
that they would not have an opportunity to participate in any
project.
The City is willing to commit that before any binding agreements
are reached with any other developer, Super Valu will be notified
of the possibility of a Phase II project and given an opportunity
• to put a package together.
As a practical matter, given the relationship between ShopKo and
Super Valu, and given the fact that the City is willing to agree
to the Cross Easement Agreement, I think it rather unlikely that
Super Valu would be unaware of any negotiations that might be
occurring on this issue.
At this point, while we have had mild interest expressed by various
parties, nothing specific has developed and if it does, we will
notify you.
I did discuss with Mark the timing of the execution of Amendment
No. 1 and asked him whether or not he needed a special meeting
prior to Tuesday's City Council meeting. He indicated that he did
not and therefore if you would be so kind as to send a clean draft
of the agreement as drafted to my attention, I will see that the
Council approves the same on Tuesday evening. I would also
appreciate it if you would forward to me one of the executed Site
Purchase Agreements.
The final issue concerns the schedule for this project. If
condemnation becomes necessary, I need a minimum of 90 days and as
a practical matter, I probably need more like 120 days. The final
environmental work does not look like it will be completed until
• July 1 at the earliest. While negotiations with various property
owners are proceeding satisfactorily, it is possible that we may
Mr. Colin Pietz
May 17, 1990
Page 3
need to adjust the October deadline slightly. Since this has no
affect on ShopKo, and since demolition will not begin until
February or March, I assume this will not be a problem. I am not
at this time requesting a change in that date because I am still
optimistic we will be able to keep to our original schedule. I am
merely alerting you to the possibility so that you are fully
advised of all developments.
If you have any questions with regard to this matter, do not
hesitate to contact me.
Thank you. Best personal regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm •
CC Gary Plotz
r1
1.
/ (612) 587 -5151
FCITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
MAY 16, 1990
TO:MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: 1990 IMPROVEMENTS
----------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
The amount of City cost for the 1990 Improvement bonds is becoming
of concern. With projects already approved the amount of City cost
has been estimated by our City Engineer John Rodeburg to be
approaching $1 million with street lights and dam repair still not
known.
With the size of the issue being about $2 million the City's
portion has become larger than our normal year. The City's portion
comes from local taxes, and the effort will be larger than
previous years.
With this in mind it would probably be in the best interest of the
City to wait until 1991 before approving any additional projects
with large city cost.
/o - 79
AMERICAN
PETROGRAPHIC
SERVICES, INC.
May 14, 1990
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: John Rodenberg
Dear Mr. Rodenberg:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a proposal for coring and
testing services on your Hutchinson Dam Project at Hutchinson, Minnesota.
The following table lists the scope of work, tests recommended and our
quotation of fees:
Concrete Corin
1. 8 - 4" core samples $1800
is 2. Geologists time to monitor (13 hours @ $65 /hr) 845
3. Mileage - 240 @ $.35 /mile 84
TOTAL: 2729
Laboratory Testing
1. 6 compressive strength tests $ 150
2. 2 petrographic analysis 790
TOTAL: 940
GRAND TOTAL: $3669
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal on your project. We
hope these tests and fees will fulfill your needs. If you have any
questions, do not hesitate to call me at 612- 659 -9001.
Respectfully,��
Scott Wolter
President
American Petrographic Services, Inc.
SW /ck
•
2102 University Ave. R` St Paul, D1\ 55114 Phone 61 ^_ -699 -9001 Fax 612-699 -13'9
/� -�,
AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC.
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR FIELD WORK
RIGHT OF ACCESS
Right -of- access to sites must be obtained by Client (or others). Unless informed otho
wise, AET will assume that right -of- access has been obtained and will proceed accordingly.
COST ESTIMATES AND PAYMENT TERMS
Any estimate of cost shall not be considered as a firm figure unless specifically stated
otherwise.
If Client has any dispute, question, or disagreement about an invoice, Client should so
inform AET within 15 days of date of invoice. Payment is past due thirty days from date of
invoice. A finance charge of one and one -half percent per month or the maximum rate
allowable by law will be applied to past due amounts.
INSURANCE
AET is protected by Worker's Compensation, Public Liability, Property Damage, and
Professional Liability insurance. AET will furnish certificates of insurance to Client
upon request.
Insurance is not available to AET (and similar firms) to protect against liability arising
out of the actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, or escape of
pollutants. Accordingly, Client and /or property owner may be liable for any such claims.
WARRANTY
AET warrants that its work will be done in accordance with methods and procedures ord•
narily exercised by reputable practitioners under similar conditions, times, and locations.
POLLUTANTS
A pollutant is defined as any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal irritant or contaminant,
including smoke, vapor, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, chemicals and waste.
In the event that a pollutant is encountered during the course of work: 1) AET will take
measures to protect its personnel and equipment and to comply with government regulations,
at current fee schedule rates, and 2) The report may state that parties with controlling
interest or ownership of land in Minnesota are required to report pollution on their land
or underground (suspected, possible or real) to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
LIMITATIONS ON LIABILITY
Client agrees to limit liability against AET on account of design defects, breach of
contract, errors, omissions, or negligence to a sum not to exceed $50,000 or the amount of
AET's fee, whichever is greater. Alternatively, if Client does not wish to limit AET's
liability, Client must so inform AET before the field work is started and Client agrees to
pay an additional 10% of the total fee.
AET is not responsible or liable for the accuracy or reliability of work done by others.
In general, AET provides work and services on properties not owned by AET. AET is respon-
sible for its work and services, but (except as indicated herein) it is not responsible fq*
the property and any structures, materials, contents, etc., in the air, on the ground, old
underground at the property.
APR 30 '90 9:11 FROM AMERICAN -ENGR -TEST PA5 =.002
AMERICAN
• 1 PETROGRAPHIC
a � SERVICES, INC.
April 30, 1990
Barr Engineering
7803 Glenroy Road
Minneapolis MN 55435
Attn: William J. Forsmark
Dear Mr. Forsmark:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with a proposal for coring and
testing services on your Hutchinson Dam Project at Hutchinson, Minnesota.
The following table lists the scope of work, tests recommended and our
quotation of fees:
Concrete Coring
• 1. 8 - 4" core samples (360 ") 1000
3. Geologists time to monitor (8 hours @ $65 /hr) 720
t •. r.: *..Acs( `tC('r r TOTAL: 17
laborator Testin
1. 6 compressive strength tests $ 150
2. 2 petrographic analysis 790
TOTAL: 940
GRAND TOTAL: $2660
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal on your project. We
hope these tests and fees will fulfill your needs. If you have any
questions, do not hesitate to call me at 612- 659 -9001.
Respectfully,
Scott Wolter
President
American Petrographic Services, Inc.
SW /ck
•
Barr
Engineering Company
7803 Glenroy Road
Minneapolis, MN 55439 -3123
6121830 -0555
6121835-0186 (Facsimile)
May 15, 1990
Mr. John P. Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Hutchinson Dam
Dear John:
I was unable to contact you last week, and I will be out of the office
Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday this week. Below is the project information
I have to date.
11
I have prepared three preliminary repair options for the dam repair.
These are rough estimates and preliminary options, and may vary based on the •
results of the concrete testing results. The costs, however, vary from
approximately $10,000 to $45,000.
I contacted Craig Regalia with the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources. We discussed briefly available funds for the project. He said
the DNR got very little funding for such assistance in the 1990 legislative
session, and that the funds available have already been targeted for a single
project. I am not aware of any other possible funding sources. I recommend
that application be made, anyway, for DNR assistance, with the understanding
that it is unlikely funds will be obtained through them. It won't hurt to
tryl
In regard to the low head weir we reviewed downstream of the Hutchinson
Dam during my May 3 site visit, I spoke with some of our staff engineers who
work with municipalities and watersheds and who deal with this issue
periodically. It does present a potential risk for drowning, particularly
if the area adjacent to the weir is developed as a park. It also represents
an aesthetic value, which may be important to the area if a park is
developed. There is no governing agency which regulates low head dams or
weirs in general. Removal of the dam may be of concern if it significantly
alters the upstream water surface elevations. I recommend that you discuss
this situation with the City's lawyer. Barr Engineering has dealt with
similar structures and issues in the past, and can recommend a lawyer who is
familiar with this issue. If you would like more information on this, please •
let me know.
Mr. John P. Rodeberg May 15, 1990 Page 2
•
I am waiting to hear further on the testing program. I would like to
have the corings and testing performed as soon as possible so that I can
complete the report. I should be in the office on Thursday and Friday this
week, and will try to contact you. If you have any questions before
Thursday, please call John Larson.
Singerely,
William J. Forsmark
wjf
2343008 /JPR0515.LTR
•
•
r�
(612) 587 -5151
f/v7Ty CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMO
DATE: May 22nd, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: T.H. 7 East (S.P. 4302 -37)
Letting No. 8 /Project No. 90 -16
Following review of T.H. 7 East Plans after the project had been
bid, it came to my attention that the City's Comprehensive Plan was
not followed for some of the construction. In particular, the
proposed 8" watermain was undersized for its proposed location west
of Michigan Street. Gene Anderson had proposed a 12" line for this
location, but since a parallel line exists on the north side of
T.H. 7, I proposed increasing the size to a 10" line. The
watermain connections at 5th Avenue were also reconfigured to match
proposed construction. A sanitary sewer crossing was also
requested for availability to three lots south of T.H. 7, west of
Michigan Street. These changes as itemized on the attached letter
• from Duininck Bros., Inc., come to $26,978.00.
We also requested that Mn /DOT redesign their storm sewer to utilize
the 18" RCP line on Michigan Street instead of the line on Garden
Road, which has had intermitant problems. Since state and federal
funding covers almost 97% of storm sewer cost, and the length of
the storm sewer does not significantly change, the City share of
the cost should not change significantly.
Also, while working on utility relocations along the route, it
became apparent that the existing 6" watermain on the north side of
T.H. 7, west of Michigan Street was going to be too shallow
following highway reconstruction. A 1100 foot stretch of the
watermain will only have approximately 4' of cover following
reconstruction, and should have at least 7 -1/2'. We recommend
lowering the watermain to insure this cover. Juul Contracting has
estimated the cost of this work at $8.50 /L.F., or $9,350.00.
We believe these changes are required to maintain the integrity and
flexibility of the municipal utilities. We recommend that the
City:
1. Approve a Supplemental Agreement for Sanitary Sewer and
Watermain Improvements to be done by Duininck Bros., Inc.,
in the amount of $26,978.00.
• 2. Enter into an agreement with Juul Contracting to lower the
existing 6" watermain at a cost of approximately $10,000.00.
The final cost for each of these proposals will be based on unit
prices. The Contractors will only be paid for work actually
completed.
/0 8
DUININCK BROS
May 3, 1990
Lowell Flaten
Project Engineer
Department of Transportation
Willmar, MN 56201
Re: S.P. 4302 -37 (T.H. 7)
Contract No. 20995
in Hutchinson
Dear Lowell,
Enclosed please find the unit prices you requested
for the watermain changes. The item, 10" Butterfly
Valve With 48" Manhole, was changed by the City Engineer
to a Gate Valve and Box. .
Sincerely,
Harris Duininck
Enclosure
� "�¢" a � 3 7 3 . '� s '°��- '-� `�� �4 t�7' FoZ � �. c_-o c�4T�ro ►.�
F r 6 , � u c — It L, *t i R a
0
DUININCK BROS., INC., NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1, P.O. BOX 208, PRINSBURG, MINNESOTA 56281
TELEPHONE (612) 978 -6011 • TELEX W.U. 29 -0565 DB & G PRNG
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1990
PROJECT NO.: 4302 -37 CITY OF UUTCHINSON PROJECT (133) 90 -01
TYPE 6 LOCATION: CHANCE IN PLAN - HIGHWAY 7
i
INCREASE
ITEMS:
PfZ OP
tIAl '
7aT�1
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
UQ ANTITf
'-=00
o !!
`f
t �4
2104.501
REMOVE WATERMAIN
LIN. FT.
20
/7
2104.509
REMOVE MANHOLES
EACH
1
5D 1
S
2104.523
SALVAGE CATE VALVE, 8"
EACH
1
2104.523
SALVAGE REDUCER, 12" X 8"
EACH
°,
1CIO
0503.601
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EACH
1
`16 -0
tisb.
0503.603
SEWER PIPE 8" PVC SDR35 0' - 8'
DEEP
LIN. FT.
94
5 -f
0503.603
CONSTRUCT MANHOLES DESIGN 4007
LIN. FT.
12.1
`)a°=
_ 11
5 1
0503.620
DUCTILE. IRON FITTINGS (M J)
POUND
1332
0504.602
HYDRANT, 5" VALVE
EACH
4
/7.0
7
0504.602
10" B""- "oT V ALVE W 49" O C
NANH0 r
EACH
1
0504.603
6" WATERMAIN, DUCTILE IRON CL
52
LIN. FT.
72
g
0504.603
10" WATERMAIN, DUCTILE IRON CL
51
LIN. FT.
1334
0504.603
12" WATERMAIN, DUCTILE IRON CL
50
LIN. FT.
190
rA
^; q
5
0506.602
CASTING ASSEMBLY MANHOLE, 700 -71712
EACH
I
� 11 i
? If 5
ghoh`l
r
.LI1Ct
c4se jo to �
�� �•
(r
cry �� `�'7
" .1 /=, [ �f /sS /9 a
3'v i
✓
�G� /�irlu /
To>, /
I NGreasC
JO
__
i
.• 1 • •
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1990
PROJECT NO.: 4302 -37 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PROJECT (133) 90 -01
TYPE 6 LOCATION: CHANCE IN PLAN - HIGHWAY 7
DECREASE
ITEMS:
PRO/?
[/n' /I
Tuna[.
N
ITEM NO.
ITEM
UNIT
UQ ANTITY
/g
2104.501
REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVFHENT
SQ.
YD.
33
0 5s-
2105.501
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)
CU.
YD.
60
/ 5,
9 0
2211.502
AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (LV)
CU.
YD.
15
9 y
91
2331.504
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE
TON
0.26
/a ° 5
3
.31
2331.514
BASE COURSE MIXTURE
TON
5
a 5
2361.504
ASPHALT CEMENT
TON
0.13
z '
3
2361.508
WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
2
_
6
0504.603
8" WATERMAIN, DUCTILE IRON CL 52
LIN.
FT.
-1332'
/.y g:
/d,.?C�
2511.516
GEOTERTILE FILTER, TYPE 5
SQ.
YD.
40
4 5
2575.505
SODDING, TYPE LAWN
SQ.
YD.
400
t
f2ece
DUININCK BR - OS
May 17, 1990
Mr. John P. Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: TH 7 East /S.P. 4302 -37
Correspondence 5/14/90
John:
In reply to your letter of 5/14/90, we are herewith submitting
additional information to help clarify our watermain costs
submitted to MnDOT on May 3, 1990.
1) The difference in cost between 10" and 8" DIP
DUININCK BROS., INC., NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1, P.O. BOX 208, PRINSBURG, MINNESOTA 56281
TELEPHONE (612) 978.6011 • TELEX W.U. 29 -0565 DB & G PRNG
based on Water Products list prices is:
•
12" (Cl 50) DIP $14.55
10" (Cl 51) DIP $11.00
8" (Cl 52) DIP $ 9.00
6" (Cl 52) DIP $ 6.55
NOTE: Final prices vary in relationship to quantity;
the increment differences are accurate.
2)
The cost in working with 10" pipe vs. 8" pipe is generally
about $2.00 /LF more because of weight and size. As pipe
size goes up, production goes down as a general rule,
all other things being equal.
3)
We will encounter increased difficulty in the area of
the relocation just south of 15th Avenue NE along
the south side of TH 7 (Sta 25 to 28+00). Working
around additional utilities means less production
and more cost per foot.
4)
Your analysis of our costs assumes our original prices
were accurate and actually reflects our full cost. This
is not always the case and our proposal prices sometimes
may reflect a subcontractor's price to us rather than our
own price and so some variation may occur in our prices
(not Proposal prices) for various items of work.
•
DUININCK BROS., INC., NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1, P.O. BOX 208, PRINSBURG, MINNESOTA 56281
TELEPHONE (612) 978.6011 • TELEX W.U. 29 -0565 DB & G PRNG
Mr. John P. Rodeberg
May 17, 1990
Page 2
5) Although fitting prices are based on an average of
all sizes, again there is more cost in fitting
assemblies for 10" or 12" pipe than in 6 "; cost of
saddles for topping services increases with larger size
pipe, not reflected in fitting costs.
Based on these factors, a cost analysis for the 10" DIP would
be:
Original base bid for 8"
$14,85
Difference, 8 " -10"
2.00
Additional Fitting Cost
0.50
Increased Costs /Size
1.90
Increased Costs /Location
2.25
Adjust Base 8" Cost
0.50
Profit and OH
(Incl.)
$22.00 /LF
Considering the same criteria, we established the prices for the
6" and 12" pipe also. Juul Contracting of Hutchinson will be
doing this work for us and we have discussed this matter with
them.
If you have any questions, please call. We hope this clarifies
our proposal and gives you the information you need.
Sincerely,
Verne Carlson
cc: Lowell Flaten, MnDOT
Juul Contracting
•
•
JUUL CONTRACTING CO.
LI S'T'ING C HART
G4sk.<s
dCKEtn
Cu �b d $
gO,DO
r fGiS
ArL
�,
!� T
rr/ L
Uar
ds
G4f Md
G� «Ti
1
S
•
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WATER & SEWER FUND
*US Postmaster
*Withhold Tax Acct
*League of MN Cities
*P.E.R.A.
Allied Mechanical
Bernard Mulcahy
Big Bear
Croon Floral
Curtin Matheson
DeVries, Randy
DPC
Dyna Systems
Gopher State One Call
Hach Co.
Hamilton
Harris Mechanical
Hotsy Corp
Hutch Utilities
Juul Contracting
Lakeland Equip
Lanz, Gerald
14N Valley Testing
P & L Mechanical
Quade Electric
Schwab - Vollhaber
Sid's Foods
State Treasurer
Trudeau & Johnson
Turf Supply
University of MN
VWR
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*Withhold Tax Acct
*P.E.R.A.
Brandon Tire
Glencoe Ford
Holt Motors
Hutch Auto Body
MPCA
MTI
Plaza OK
Rockmount
Snap on Tools
Wigen Chevrolet
------ - - - - -- MAY 22, 1990
-- ---------- - - - - --
water bills postage
154.58
employer contribution
654.12
reg fee- R.DeVries
155.00
employer contribution
382.45
material
47.78
coupler assembly
37.23
dehumidifier
179.99
sym plant for D.Olsen
21.05
supplies
102.12
conference expense
58.37
chemicals
60.00
tray & slide rack
107.46
April service
162.50
supplies
169.59
swivel caster
149.30
May inspection
1,150.00
detergent
77.00
elec & gas
195.82
install w/s
2,203.50
kit
104.94
class B license fee
15.00
tests
126.00
appl #7
4,275.00
appl #1, repairs & lamps
55,294.98
exhaust hood
1,060.00
food coloring
9.03
license renewals
45.00
timer
137.38
tupersan
53.52
addl fee for soil tests
36.00
supplies
276.68
TOTAL
$67,501.39
employer contribution
96.22
employer contribution
56.35
tire repairs
174.72
pinion kit
14.22
rear shoes
57.30
repair
210.35
hazardous waste fees
42.00
hose
24 .37
supplies
12.29
supplies
202.88
parts
89.12
repair
1,241.60
TOTAL
$2,221.42
i1 6 ? 1
2
GENERAL FUND
• *Withhold Tax Acct
*County Treasurer
*AARP
*DNR
*League of MN Cities
*Briggs & Morgan
*Connie Mangan
*Southwest Leasing
*P.E.R.A.
*DNR
*Commissioner of Revenue
A & B Electric
Access Rentals
Allied Mechanical
Am Planning Assc
American Risk
Antigua, Michael
Arnold & McDowell
Arnold & McDowell
Bennett Office
Berglund, Jay
Bernhagen Electric
Beytien, Joyce
• Big Bear
Brandon Tire
Brinkman, Milt
Brown, Brian
Camera Shop
Cash Wise
Central Allied Enterprises
Chapin Pub
Com of Transportation
Copy Equipment
County Treasurer
Crow River Press
Dept Trade & Econ Dev
Dept of Labor & Ind
Designer Pools
Dramatic Pub
Eileen Goeder Estate
Fahey Sales /Shingobee Bldrs
Family Rexall
Feed Rite Controls
Flaherty Equip
Gander Ridge Guns
Gopher Sign
Goranson, Kelly
Great Plains
Gregor, John
• Haarstad, Earl
Harris Mechanical
Haugen, Mary
Hensen, Mark
employer contribution
4,082.74
dust coating
2,090.00
driving course
238.00
DNR fees
577.00
reg fees
1,135.00
reg fees - Merrill & Bernhagen
50.00
NAHRO conference
345.00
vehicle lease
265.71
employer contribution
5,124.40
DNR fees
664.00
April sales tax
1,348.83
installation
281.63
caster
39.72
repair
343.42
dues
85.00
May services
800.00
fuel
94.04
May compensation
3,000.00
airport appraisal
1,789.28
service contract
28.73
overpayment of fees
74.00
bulbs
35.00
reimburse for open house
57.10
supplies
44.1-1
service
5.50
May rent
175.00
class expense
45.00
film
5.46
supplies
66.65
supplies
82.12
bid ads
205.20
hangar loan payment
700.00
supplies
164.10
DL fees
95.50
envelopes & letterhead
111.95
reg- J.Bernhagen
35.00
exemption certificate
50.00
plugs
72.00
royalty
25.35
contract payment
1,500.00
small cities loan
24,047.21
markers
6.72
demurrage & paint
924.37
maintenance inspection
161.00
rent of 2 guns
200.00
street sign
87.15
class expense
45.00
supplies
440.37
expenses
46.27
reimburse for pulley
10.73
services
196.33
meeting expense
27.68
meeting expense
25.75
3
Holiday Inn Brainerd
G.Plotz
130.89
HRLARP
refund employer cont -Ward
858.29
Hutch Fire & Safety
recharge & water
116.55
Hutch Utilities
elec & gas
7,650.24
Hutch Tech College
fire course
125.00
Ingleman Design /Allied Mech
small cities loan
7,225.00
Jayco Aviation
fuel
2,273.14
Joe's Sport Shop
plates
15.00
K -Mart
film
96.00
Kalenberg, Peter
overpayment of fees
11.00
Kelm, Cindy
refund building rental
7.50
Kitchenmaster, Mark
fuel
26.80
Ladd, Larry
reimburse for open house
11.34
Law Enforcement Equip
badges
857.45
League of MN Cities
reg- Merrill & Plotz
50.00
Lundahl's
Sno Ball dinners
440.00
Madson, Steve
meeting expense
35.98
Marco
repair
84.38
Marka, James
meeting expenses
25.75
McCormick, Emmet,Margery
easement
8,600.00
McGarvey Coffee
filter packs
54.90
Meeker Sand & Gravel
sand
55.29
Merrill, Ken
meeting expense
18.02
Mid Central
hose
890.00
Midcontinent Theatre
50 tickets
150.00
• Mini
Biff
MN Elevator
toilet rental
service
120.00
55.70
MN Valley Forest Prod
wood chips
196.00
MN Sports Fed
sanction fees
380.00
Moon, Dolf
meals
15.60
Motorola
radio
842.51
NADA
annual subscription
39.00
New Ulm Growers
plants
100.00
Niska, Patsy
CJIS course
100.00
Normandale Japanese Gardens
tour
10.00
Northern States Supply
sander repair
21.00
Notch's Metal Fab
repair
60.00
Paulsen, Curtis
fence posts
125.00
Peterson, Richard
St. Louis Trip refund
520.00
Pioneer
paint
408.00
Plaza OK
supplies
137.74
Plotz, Gary
mileage
6.56
Plotz, Gary
conference exp
138.93
Powell, Craig
class expense
206.56
Quade Electric
repair & lamps
240.64
Quast Transfer
freight
33.20
Ranger Industrial Corp
part
28.07
RCIdentification
id core cards
228.00
Robinson Appraisal
lot appraisals
1,000.00
Rodeberg, John
add'1 moving expenses
217.22
Rodeberg, John
conference exp
200.37
• Rutz
Plumbing
part
18.50
Schmeling Oil
oil
28.00
Schmidt, Mike
class expense
173.76
Sears
tool
9S.00
4
Shopko
Sid's Foods
Simons Allyn Marketing
Standard Printing
State Treasurer
State of MN
Streichers
Two Way Com
Up & Away Balloons
US West
Wesley's Pharmacy
Willard, Bud
Willmar Tech College
Xerox
•
photos & supplies
280.88
supplies
57.66
hats
266.10
supplies
131.42
license renewal
15.00
appl fee- M.Hensen
70.00
partition
360.00
radio
679.95
Sr Prom balloons
40.00
May service
98 _54
film
2.29
St. Louis trip refund
260.00
plan
96.00
April service 5052
520.70
TOTAL
$90,586.54
L
5
is
C ,
J
YOUTH CENTER FUND
*P.E.R.A.
*Withhold Tax Acct
BURNS MANOR CONSTRUCTION
Joerns Health Care
Lintex Corp
Anderson Interiors
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE
Loren & Annette Lickfelt
Ingleman Designs /Allied Mech
Fahey Sales /Shingobee Bldrs
1990 TAX INC CONSTRUCTION
Am National Bank
Hutch Leader
Family Rexall Drug
Popps Electrical
Moody's Investors
Ehlers & Assc
Robinson Appraisal Co.
Pace Laboratories
LIQUOR STORE
Com of Revenue
Com of Revenue
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Withhold Tax Acct
Ken Merrill
P.E.R.A.
Ed Phillips & Sons
Johnson Brothers
Griggs, Cooper
Quality Wine
employer
contribution
36.56
employer
contribution
62.42
service call
TOTAL
$98.98
beds
professional fees
3,812.10
drapes &
rods
3,840.00
carpet
TOTAL
358.20
wine & liquor
TOTAL
$8,010.30
part of lot 9 blk 11 25,200.00
8% HCDC loan 1,275.00
8% HCDC loan 4,243.63
TOTAL $30,718.63
issuance fee
1,321.00
pub costs
190.35
films
70.95
service call
45.68
professional service
4,000.00
professional fees
11,840.31
appraisals
4,500.00
inspection
6,600.00
TOTAL
$28,568.29
sales tax
9,679.10
April sales tax
8,092.40
lottery sales
104.00
lottery sales
182.00
payroll
4,190.24
employer contribution
303.26
logis meeting
14.93
employer contribution
175.24
wine & liquor
5,728.80
wine & liquor
4,804.30
wine & liquor
2,263.31
wine & liquor
3,577.94
TOTAL
$39,115.52
•
(612) 587 -5151
• W ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: May 17th, 1990
TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
Ron Rirchoff
Mayor and City Council (F.Y.I.) ✓
FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official 9 Kn
RE: Swimming Pool Fencing - Status
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Attached is a copy of a letter from Ms. Rod Anderson assuring compliance prior
to filling of their swimming pool. I suggest we hold off on legal proceedings
unless lack of cooperation becomes apparent.
rka
Building Official
JGM /pv
attachment
J
}lutclthwN akk of G'hira}vtrTCtic
Dr. X'atUwlcm# D.G'
Dr. xadcrt Y. &47
May 15, 1990
Mr. James G. Marka
Building Official
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Status of swimming pool
Dear Mr. Marka:
.Ctbrary 4=r east NiuI&V
(ecst Of - Gbrary)
451tassaa SAW
Xutchhux. 44hYff&0A7 55 L
(612) 587 -8919
Per our phone conversation last week, this letter is to keep you
posted as to our intentions regarding compliance with the new
mandatory fence law.
We have no intention of opening our pool until it meets with the new
city ordinance. At this point we have some other problems with the
pool that also need attention, so we haven't been in a hurry to have
it fenced.
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Glenda Anderson
•
•
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
VASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
:HINSON, MINN. 55350
DATE: May 7th, 1990
TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official
RE: Status of Swimming Pool Ordinance
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The status of Hutchinson's recently adopted Ordinance Ho. 89 -06, requiring
fencing around swimming pools is substantially complete, with all but one
party in compliance or in the process of compliance.
My intent of this letter is to request your service in beginning legal
proceedings against Mr. Rodney Anderson, whom unfortunately, is the owner of
the pool where the original near drowning incident occurred.
. Mr. Anderson has not responded or requested inspection despite numerous
letters or verbal conversations. My most recent letter (attached) established
a ten day deadline from April 25th, 1990.
I trust your service will be prompt as usual.
J 1 i �.Ca.j&S'
Ja1ea G. Marks
Building Official
JGM/pv
attachment
cc: Dr. Rodney Anderson
Mayor and City Council (FYI)
osu d
MCLEOD COUNTY
Zoning Administrator
63011 th Skeet East - Court House
GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 5533 6-2270
Phone 864 -5551 Eta. 259
EDWIN E. HOMAN
Administrator
May 15, 1990 .6;�
From: Paul Melch o�d Ed Homan
To: City Clerks and City Council Members of McLeod County.
Re: Coordination of Municipal Recycling.
0
R � 4 / 1 � 0 1 99 go N
wu
FOR YOUR INF_ORMAZIOR
In the fall of 1989 you were notified that McLeod County had become eligible to receive
SCORE funding for local recycling programs. Under the original plan, a centralized recycling
program directed by McLeod County was to be implemented in each municipality and all rural
areas of the county. Because several communities expressed the desire to conduct independent
programs, a resolution was adopted by the Solid waste Advisory Board in February 1990 to allow
municipalities to do so.
After studying the individual program budgets in recent weeks, it has come to our
attention that in marry circumstances, the County couidexecute equally effective local recycling
programs in several communities for substantially less money than has been proposed. This is e
direct result of a variety of factors including bulk purchasing power, and limited capital
expenditures.
At this time we would like to extend to each individual community the opportunity to
reconsider whether or not it would be more feasible or appropriate to allow the County to
coordinate the recycling program in your community. In the event that you decide to allow McLeod
County to coordinate your program, we will continue to work with you to meet your Individual
needs, whi le providing you with an effective, efficient, and quite possibly more economically
feasible recycling program in your community.
However, should you decide to continue to direct your municipal plan, we will encourage
and assist you with your program in anyway possible. if possible, please inform this office of
your p iansidecision by May 21, or by May 31 at the latest. Feel free to contact either of us with
questions regarding this matter.
rJ
McLeod County is an Equal Opportunity EmployerfAlfirmahve Action
0
HUTCHINSON IRON & METAL
304 First Avenue S.E.
Hutchinson, Minnesota
May 14, 1990
CO., INC.
55350
Mr. James Marks
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Jim,
F OR
I am writing this letter as a follow -up to our conversation regarding
. mobile scrap - yards. As you know, I am upset about the various scrap
metal businesses setting up in parking lots around town. These
businesses do not comply with the zoning ordinances as currently
written. The fact that these scrap metal businesses call themselves
recycling centers does not negate the fact that they are in essence
scrap metal reprocessors. I do not consider it right or proper that I
must comply with the zoning ordinances, pay considerable property
taxes as well as the latest special assessments for curb and gutter
being installed in our neighborhood, as well as employ members of the
community all to the betterment of the Hutchinson economy while the
above mentioned businesses come into town, disregard the local zoning
laws, contribute nothing to the tax base or the local economy and
compete with me on an "unlevel" playing field.
I am therefore asking that either these business be made to conform
with the local zoning ordinances or be banned from Hutchinson. It is
my understanding from our previous conversations that this is possible
under our local zoning laws.
If the city choses to make exceptions for recycling businesses, I would
deem it necessary to change the name of my business from Hutchinson
Iron and Metal Inc. to an appropriate name in order to exempt myself
from the -`xve ordinances imposed upon my business. This would
enable me to establish myself in any neighborhood throughout the town
as the mobile scrap yards are presently doing. I would rather not be
• forced to take such steps. I would rather see the other scrap yards
comply with the current ordinances.
1
As you know from our previous conversations, other small cities
throughout the state have dealt with the same problem in a similar
manner and I hope we can do the same. Please let me know if there is
any additional information I can present to you regarding this matter.
As usual your help is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Jay P. Freedland
President
\J
04
(612) 587 -5151
ff ITY OF HUTCHINSON
WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M D FOR YOUR INFORMATION
DATE: May 17th, 1990
TO: Planning Staff
Planning Commission
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
Mayor and City Council
FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official
RE: Ponsford's Home - Relocate Mfg. Home from Country Club Terrace
to 420 School Road South
In regard to the proposed Conditional Use Permit to place a manufactured home
at 420 School Road South, it appears that all D.A.P.I.A. requirements and H.U.D.
requirements can be complied with. Please note that I have reviewed and
confirmed the document with Mr. Randy Vogt, from the State of Minnesota Building
Code Division - Manufactured Housing.
• The Planning Commission was equally split (one absence) in their consideration
of "Neighborhood Continuity ". Due to the neighborhood opposition and
controversy, I have consulted with Barry Anderson, City Attorney, who assured
me he would review the relevant statutes on this subject matter.
For your reference, I am attaching page 25 of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance. I
speculate that the criteria level of Section 6.02, 2, (a), (b) & (c) will be
topics for discussion.
�
J s G. Marka
Building Official
JGM /pv
attachment
•
regulations applicable to the district in which it is to
be located;
(b) Planned development in accordance with the provisions of
Section 8.09 of this Ordinance in any district; and
(c) Any of the following uses in any residential or commercial
district:
(1) Hospitals, clinics and medical office buildings when
such buildings are located on a lot having an entire
front, rear or side lot line adjoining, or across a
municipal street from, a lot or tract of land on
which a hospital is located; provided the external
appearance of such hospitals, clinics and medical
office buildings shall be compatible in character,
appearance and design with that of other uses in the
area.
(2) Day care, education, religious, philanthropic or
charitable institutions.
(3) Community recreational buildings and field.
(d) Any of the following uses in any district:
(1) Public buildings to be used by the City, Township,
County, State or Federal governments.
(2) Buildings, facilities or premises of public service
corporations to be used for public utility purposes
reasonably necessary to the public convenience or
welfare.
( - 2. A conditional use permit for the uses listed in Section 8 of
this Ordinance shall be granted only if evidence is presented
to establish:
(a) That the proposed building or use at the particular
location requested is necessary or desireable to provide a
service or a facility which is in the interest the
public convenience and will contribute o e eneral
wet are of e n eighborhood or community;
(b) That the
sub �Tanf
property
cond iM
the p
ed building or use will not have a
un ue adverse effect upon adiacent
the c e neighborhood traffic
uti I ify rariJ Mes and o er matters affecting
c health, safety and general welfare; and
0
•
(c) That the proposed building or use will be designed,
arranged, and operated so as to permit the development and
use of neighboring property in accordance with the
applicable district regulations.
25
(612) 587.5151
AZI — Kd/' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
DATE: May 18th, 1990
M E M 0
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO: Planning Staff
Planning Commission
H.C.D.C.
City of Hutchinson Directors
Mayor and City Council
FROM: James G. Marks, Building Official
RE: Final Comprehensive Plan
As you may or may not know, the Planning Commission has not formally approved
the Final Draft of the Comprehensive Plan for reasons listed below.
1) Cover Sheet - Date should be February 1990, not September 1989.
2) Acknowledgements - Spelling error - should be Roland Ebent and spelling of
administrator is incorrect. Also, Eugene Anderson is not retired.
• 3) Page 7 - the areas labeled Parks north of the corner of Lewis Avenue and
School Road are private properties. Also, the L.D.R. tract southeast of
the School Road South and South Grade Road intersection should be labeled A.
4) Page 17 - Downtown Headline belongs down one paragraph.
5) Page 21 - under Commercial Areas add the following statement:
"The land north of the airport runway and south of South Grade Road
should remain agricultural to avoid future noise and safety problems."
Also, Hutchinson Development Corp. is Hutchinson Community Development
Corp. - page 40.
6) Page 23 - scratch edges behind river and add paragraph:
"The City will work to improve the water quality of the river and
basin to facilitate greater recreational opportunities."
Also, add the word "is" between production and physically in the first
paragraph under Aesthetics.
7) Page 34 6 37 - the Hutchinson Vo -Tech is now the Hutchinson Technical
College.
• 8) Page 45 - Bluff Road should read Bluff Street.
Final Comprehensive Plan
May 18th, 1990
Page 2
The above listed items represent the final changes from the proposed Final
Draft.
In order to complete the task, please contact me by June 12th, 1990 if you
have any comments, additions or alterations.
James G. Marks
Building Official
JGK /pv
cc: Bill Weber, B.R.W.
11
•
L
J✓ � ,,� `
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Land Use
Road System
Sanitary Sewer System
Surface Water Drainage System
Parks and Open Space System
September 1989
191MA'
0
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Paul L. Ackland
Michael A. Carts
John Mlinar
Pat Mikulecky
Marlin Torgerson
PLANNING COMMISSION
William Cr Chairman
Roland bent E 3E ^1 T
Elroy Dobratz
Larry Romo
Clint Gruel(
Thomas Lyke
Marlin Torgerson, Councilman
CITY STAFF
Gary Plotz, City Administrator SRN'
James Marka,Building/ZoningAdmin tart r___ _
Eugene Anderson, Director or Engineering
PLANNING CONSULTANT
BRW, Inc.
William Weber, AICP, Project Planner
• •
1 T • •
M
LM R C A
LOR
lDR +,o- l A
4 I
LOR Loft C)
}y ,
` ' '•w t '9T'v§i Sk /1 P ,� A� ti}^ i� LJ `°" A
LOA �. 6
LM LDA
LDR
I
„
w" lOR ,nt f e'i2 f , 1,.ti
l c
. r , �• I�i .; .. ...� C C
1 I
• C • .a �'eSr IA" .
,.� • i ,..
I
Il i — ... � � ......., n €••.Liy�sJ .t^ t' , � .' � �;, •/ I I� \. i 1
/liY _ L aka
fl•r MIT
U y
Im �� � 1 1,1 'It MI " •.. fi .. I' I .� I( r !- 1
i. {!VIA P • ;
ldl
Lon
C v
1
MDR :I •..'' .Y A
§,.
M014 U p
rculw i n r.r s,.°e.,t.,n" A /J _ -_ C'I d �"" R. � F R inR FDR n
LOR
el ww, NOR P
A
y .orwa r„ww, A A _
C C MDR �
YEAR 2010
Hutchinson Comprehensive Plan LAND USE PLAN
�s
J -Ir Dowwntown:
In the east side industrial area south of Highway 7 , there are two basic options for growth: (1)
along Michigan Street extended south of the railroad tracks or (2) east of the present industrial
area.The City will do a follow -up study to determine which is the more cost - effective and strategic
location for industrial growth, taking into account the potential business park near Hutchinson
Technology, Inc.
(See also the Industrial land use policies on page 21.)
Major outward growth is not planned for the central business district although minor instances of
conversion of housing to business on the periphery may be expected. The principal changes in
Downtown Hutchinson should be in the evolution of the types of retail businesses, in the amount
of professional office space, and the pattern of parking.
Parks:
Additional playground sites are indicated in fringe residential areas of the Land Use Plan. The
standards used were to space parks approximately 3/4 to one mile apart or to eliminate the need
to cross major roadways, and to provide approximately eight to twelve acres of active parkland for
every 3,000 to 4,000 residents.
Protection Open Space:
Several locations are shown on the Land Use Plan as general locations for surface water ponds.
The City should increase its use of water detention areas so as to reduce the demands on the storm
_ sewer system. The exact locations and capacities of such ponds should be determined through an
updated surface water management study which involves topographic considerations and calcula-
tions of water runoff, routing, and outflow.
• 17
/� • The City will carefully review proposals for commercial development to ensure that
traffic safety and flow on adjacent roads are not unduly affected and that nearby housing
- - is protected.
�E LRNb / , of VM A4eAb0 • The City will require that new commercial developments (except those in the
• &,4toA� 1400 -)OO OF `."')T 4 Downtown) have a high level of landscaping and that signage conforms to the regula-
tions of the Hutchinson Sign Ordinance.
r�lr;teUclu,C.!t_To A✓OtD vk'C - 1 •
Commercial development should be extended south along Highway 15 only as sanitary
sewer and water lines are extended. The Townships should be encouraged to zone this
land for agriculture until services are made available. The City will extend sewer and
water lines when it has received an appropriate petition from landowners for a public
improvement project and annexation.
• Along the north side of Highway 7 west of Highway 15, land should be rezoned from
residential to commercial only in a sequence starting from land which is already
commercially zoned.
s
Industrial Areas
• Industrial development will be directed to the areas so designated on the Land Use
Plan, primarily on the eastern fringe of the community, the 3M site, and a few locations
along Highway 7. m)a tq
• The City will work with the Hutchinsorwevelopment Corporation to promote the idea
of a "business park" on the north side of Highway 7 near Hutchinson Technology. The
business park, which would benefit from a new zoning district, would include offices,
office- showroom buildings', research and development, and light industry which is
aesthetically compatible with the office elements of the business park. There should be
a planned boulevard landscaping plan. A business park would complement the
Hutchinson Industrial Park by providing an alternative and upgraded environment for
21
Collector Street System
• The City will not pursue for the foreseeable future the direct linkage of Fifth -Juhl -and
Roberts Road because it believes that the cost of this project and its negative effects
would be greater than the problem it might solve.
urnMJoit (
• The City will work with the Hutchinson Development Corporation and Hutchinson
Technology, Inc., to plan and build a north -south Collector street east of Hutchinson
Technology in conjunction with the development of a business park in that vicinity.
Local Street System
• The Local Street system will be planned comprehensively by neighborhood.
• Local Streets will be designed to limit traffic speeds and volumes yet allow access
throughout a neighborhood and not create "islands" of housing. Cul -de -sac streets will
be allowed in balance with curvilinear neighborhood connectors.
• 0 40 •
The residential properties north of Highway 7 and west of Main Street will, for the most
part, continue to be devoted to housing for the time being except as noted on the Land
Use Plan. The City Planning Commission will periodically review this policy, taking
into account building conditions, commercial market strength, and landowner desires.
The City will rezone this property only upon receipt of an acceptable site development
plan which protects adjoining residential property and the traffic flow on Highway 7.
River k
• The City will engage in a long -term program of obtaining property rights of floodway
lands along the Crow River downstream of Bluff/Adams Street for the purpose of
constructing walking and bicycling trails. Fee title of such land is not needed although
this would be desirable. Private contributions will be sought for this program.
• - 1 - h2 C,t t %;%I� wcrk aro /Ohl"ue 466) wtitr t }wl,{.t o+ iM� rwnr t%4
Aestheties 6kslw J•� 600-1k yrY•hr reeRwilo.,AI gfIYY uw,1 ;(S
The appearance of a community can be a powerful element in its efforts to recruit new business
and residents. That is especially true in this era when the national economy is moving from
resource exploitation, in which production ysically linked to the resource, to services and high
technology, in which location is dependent upon other variables, among these the quality of life
of the employees.
• The City will continue with its street forestation program and increase its efforts along
Highway 7 as noted above. Special attention will be paid to the community's peripheral
entrances, and the priority of work will be determined based upon visual need and
traffic volume. Commercial landowners and other affected citizens will be consulted
during the design process to ensure that the landscaping does not create a visual or
functional problem. Residents will be encouraged through an educational campaign to
?'A
Southern Periphery:
The City agrees that County Road 8 should be extended east north of the airport runway
and along the County Road 89 alignment and lead to a bridge over the Crow River,
then to TH 22 as shown by Figure 3, Southern Fringe Road System Plan. This route is
intended to improve east -west movement in this section of the County by linking the
existing portion of County Road 8 to Jefferson Street and Highway 22. On the City's
functional classification system for roads, this route would be classified as a Minor
Arterial.
The County will not participate in the funding of another river bridge in this vicinity
for the foreseeable future, so any other east -west route the City may construct along
the southern fringe of the City will not cross the river unless the City pays the cost of
that bridge entirely on its own. This also means that Michigan Street (extended) will
probably not be extended across the Crow River. In the distant future, there could be
some other north -south County Road built through farm fields east of the City con-
necting to County Road 8 at Highway 22, then across the Crow River.
A recommended east -west Collector road for the southern fringe of Hutchinson is
illustrated by Figure 3. This right -of -way should be acquired during the platting process
and completed as a public improvement project when needed to serve housing develop-
ment in the vicinity to the north. Completion of this road will help relieve traffic demand
on Century Avenue, as there may be no other way to access Jefferson Street from land
east and south of th =eeed roperty. The portion of this Collector road west of Highway
15 is expected to be long after the portion east of Highway 15.
. d,4,ya ��
An east -west Collector road along the south side of the Hutchinson Vocational-Tech-
mcal IInstitwe property is not possible because of a residential plat that was approved
and developedwest of Jefferson Street along that east -west alignment. The intersection
• • 34 •
• •
School Road Extended:
•
Add a Collector segment through a new northwest neighborhood for a smooth connec-
tion to North High Road.
Kouwe Street Extended:
This property line is a proper path for a residential collector.
Texas Avenue:
This street should be looped back to Highway 7 at Collector standards to serve the
high - density housing planned for the vicinity. The local leg shown between the mid -
and high - density housing to the east should he designed at local standards with no
parking or Collector standards with parking on one side only.
• East of Hutchinson Technology, Inc.:
There will be a need and opportunity for a segment in this general location. The point
of intersection with Highway 7 must be carefully planned and the street should be laid
out as part of a business park plan in conjunction with Hutchinson Technology.
• South of��`
A future collector road is planned to run east -west between Sch ?ol Road (extended)
and Jefferson Street along a line located 900 feet south of the HVIT,property and 1700
feet north of the future County Road 8 (presently County Road 89).
37
SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM
PLAN
Most of the City of Hutchinson is served by storm sewer lines which replace the natural system of
drainage. In some locations, however, elements of the natural drainage are maintained as part of
the overall surface water management system including part of the Crow River floodplain.
Surface Water Drainage System Issues
The following surface water management issues have been identified:
• There are several isolated locations which flood when the storm sewer system cannot
handle the peak flow of water. The degree of severity of these back -ups varies from
minor to major. What approach should the City take to resolving various periodic
flooding problems?
• The major location of flooding caused by an inadequate storm sewer system is generally
' ,We along Bluff oa� between the river and Waller Drive. In this vicinity, County Ditch 18,
which was constructed in 1912 and meanders under private and public property, is
insufficient to handle the peak flows, causes unwanted temporary ponding on open
property, and allegedly contributes to flooding in some basements.
• 0 45 0
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR INFORMq T
. REGULAR MEETING SON
Monday, April 2, 1990
The meeting opened at 8:15 p.m.
Randy reported on the certification process. They will be starting
to certify already.
Butch reported that he took the S.O.P. and By -Laws to City Attorney
Barry Anderson for his opinion on them he will report back.
Jim Popp reported on the changes of the S.O.P.
The following bills and runs were read:
BILLS
GENERAL ACCOUNT
Hutch Fire & Safety
340.80
CRCC
214.50
Allen Office Supp
19.30
Jamie Emans
123.19
Mark Jahnke
400.00
SW Tech Coll
1105.00
US Post Office
25.00
Joe's Sport
29.68
• Ink Spots
31.15
Uniforms Unlim.
114.05
Northland Bev.
58.87
Hutch Fire &Safe
113.85
3/23
•
Legion
3/25
2575.39
RURAL & CITY ACCOUNTS
10 -52
3/27
Mid Cent Inc
313.00
Allen Office
3.49
Sid's Foods
10.74
Allied Mech
254.08
Allied Mech 1008.68
Hutch Fire &Safe
9.65
Hutch Fire &Safe
2.50
Allen Office
6.60
ISD #423
35.00
Coast to Coast
23.52
MN Conway
114.00
MN Conway
160.00
Brad Emans
6.50
Randy Redman
11.00
Steve Schramm
8.50
Jim Brodd
23.00
John Reynolds
6.50
Bruce Precht
11.50
Ed Homan
1.00
Total
2009.26
RUNS
3/4
Victorian Inn
3/5
Goebels
3/6
Conrad
3/7
Rescue
3/9
Svoboda
3/10
455 High ST.
3/11
Haugen
3/17
3M
3/18
Danielson
3/19
K Mart
3/19
Fox
3/20
Heilman
3/23
•
Legion
3/25
Peterson
3/27
10 -52
3/27
Mutual Aid
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT MINUTES
4/2/90
3/27
Citizens Bank
3/30
Falling
3/5
Drill
3/19
Drill
3/29
Flom
3/30
Buss
3/12
Drill
Motion was made and seconded to allow bills and runs. Motion
passed.
Regional meeting will be held April 23 at Plato starting at 8:00
p.m.
A letter was read from the Marshall Fire Dept. that they have their
100 year Centenial on July 14, 1990. If anyone wants to go sign
up.
Brent Reiner was voted on to his one year probation period.
Fire Prevention Committee reported that the open house is
tentatively set for Sept. 15.
Motion was made and seconded to allow up to $3000.00 for the Open
House. Motion passed.
Motion was made and seconded to give the Oxygen Sensor back to the
city water dept. and we can use it when we want. Motion passed.
Brad reported that George will be responding to all structure
fires.
Motion was made and seconded to buy a DictaPhone. Motion passed.
It was decided that if anyone wants to attend the officer meeting
TALK TO THE CHIEFS to get on the agenda.
Meeting adjourned 10:15 p.m.
Submitted by,
Jamie Emans
C J
J
•
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICER MEETING
Monday, April 9, 1990
The meeting opened at 9:00 p.m.
FOR ,YOUR INFORMATION
It was decided that 238 will be manned with 3 men for grass fires.
It was discussed to buy 2 motorized fans out of the dance fund.
Meeting adjourned 9:45 p.m.
Submitted by,
Jamie Emans
L
IlutCblusun Saety Cuuncll
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
The Hutchinson Safety Council met April 30, 1990 at 12:00 noon at the Heritage
Center.
Is
0
Duane Hoeschen, County Emergency Services Director presented the program. A
major portion of his job function is to prepare for hazardous materials mishaps.
Mr. Hoeschen also works with the severe weather "skywatch" program.
There were 16 members present.
President George Field called the meeting to order. The minutes and Treasurer's
report were approved as submitted.
Old Business
1. After some discussion, Dennis Asay moved that the 1930 Highway Patrol squad
car replica be reserved for the Water Carnival Parade. Jim Nielsen Volunteered
to confirm the reservation and fill out the forms for entry in the Parade.
Joyce Rix seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
2. Jean Ward commended Les Smith on the News Releases he has been submitting on
behalf of the Safety Council and moved that Les Smith be named in charge
of publicity and Joyce Rix be the historian for the Safety Council. The
motion was seconded and Carried unanimously.
3. Les Smith has not received any responses concerning the Fair.
New Business
1. George Field announced that there will be a Minnesota State Safety Council
conference on May 7,8, 9 at the Radisson South. If anyone wants to attend
expenses would be paid by the Hutchinson Safety Council.
2. George Field received a letter from the Hutchinson Fire Department Fire
Prevention Chariman concening plans for a Public Safety Open House on
Saturday, September 15th from 11:00 - 4:00 P.M. asking for Hutchinson Safety
Council involvement. A copy of the letter is attached to the minutes;
please review prior to the next meeting for discussion.
The next meeting will be held on May 21 , 1990 due to the Memorial Day Holiday.
Hutchinson City Engineer John Rodeberg will present the program.
There being no further business, President George Field declared the meeting
adjourned.
Submitted by Jean Ward, Secretary /Treasurer
Treasurers Report:
Checking Balance: $224.88
Savings Balance: $177.34
0
George F. Field
Fire Marshal
City of Hutchinson
31 Washington Ave. West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
In 1987 the Hutchinson Fire Department had an open house. The Fire Prevention
Committee is planning another open house for Saturday, September 15th from
11:00 to 15:00. We would like to call this a Public Safety Open House to be
held at the Fire Station and including your agencies, as follows:
Hutchinson Police Department
Hutchinson Ambulance Service
McLeod County Sheriff's Department and Posse
Hutchinson Safety Council
At the present time our committee is planning the following activities:
1) Auto extrication demonstrations.
2) Fire extinguisher demonstrations.
3) Pumper demonstrations with use of hos lines.
4) Stop, Drop and Roll with stickers given away.
5) Wood b,ani•ig stove safety.
6) Electrical safety demonstrations.
7) Fire fighter air pack demonstrations.
8) Demonstration on crawling low in smoke to get out safely.
9) Get out safely demonstration - smoke filled room demonstration.
10) Videos
11) Repelling frum the atrial ladder.
13) Selling pork rib sandwiches and pop.
We Fill have registration for drawings for smoke detectors, fire extinguishers,
and any other items you may consider from your agency.
We will have fire safety pamphlets, balloons, pencils and stickers as give
&rays.
We are looking forward to your involvement in the Public Safety Open House.
Robert Vieyra
Fire Prevention Committee Chairman
0
•
RV /pv
April 19th, 1990
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD FOR YOUR 1NFORMgTjpy
Executive Committee Meeting, April 9, 1990
•
Present: Ric Emery, Willmar
William Scherer, Hutchinson
Carol Conradi, Willmar
Arlen LaCombe, Ortonville
Jan Kreie, Brownton
Stan Jacobson, Granite Falls
Marie Schoener, Cosmos
Lorna Carlson, Murdock
Representing:
Willmar
Hutchinson
Willmar
Big Stone County
McLeod County
Chippewa County
Meeker County
Swift County
•
I
w
w
Others present: Burton Sundberg, Director
Katherine Matson, Associate Director
David Lauritsen, Chippewa County Librarian
The April 9 meeting of the Pioneerland Library System Executive Committee was called
to order by chairperson Ric Emery.
A motion was passed to accept the March 12 minutes as typed (Jacobson / Schoener).
A motion was passed to approve the March financial report (Conradi /LaCombe). Mr.
Sundberg distributed the 1989 Financial Statements (auditor's report) and drew
attention to various parts. He will inquire regarding the auditor's suggestions
on the handling of petty cash. The auditor's report will be distributed to the
full board at the May meeting.
The director's printed report accompanied the agenda mailing. Mrs. Matson distributed
the statistical reports and pointed out the circulation increase over one year ago.
She passed around clippings and drew attention to some of them. The staff retreat
at GLCB will be held April 19 -20. Board members are welcome and are to contact
Mrs. Matson for a reservation.
A motion was passed for the approval of the bills (LaCombe /Scherer).
Mrs. Matson brought the SAMMIE update. The first draft of the PLS Long Range Plan
will be sent to LDS. It will be mailed to PLS board members and they will be asked
to approve it at the May meeting. Mr. Sundberg presented the Ad Hoc Committee report.
There has been discussion within the committee as to how to reduce the size of the
board. The feeling is that this must be done carefully. Mr. Emery gave the Personnel
Committee report and explained the proposals regarding 1991 staff costs.
A motion was passed that the proper officers sign the agreement with the City of
Fairfax (Jacobson /Kreie).
A motion was passed that Noel Phifer be the convenor of a Public Relations Committee
and that he ask for volunteers to serve on it (Kreie /Conradi). It was decided that
the Finance Committee should plan to meet so they can bring a 1991 budget proposal
to the full board in July.
The matter of paying the cost of a meal for board members who travel 50 miles or
more to meetings was tabled until July when the budget is discussed. The next
meeting (full board) will be held May 14 in Montevideo.
Mileage vouchers were completed.
The meeting was adjourned.
Lorna Carlson
Secretary
♦: /J1.W
ii /9J
.,:14:1• 71 ,UVO
7---- L56WtK- _ -.__.. _
ACCODNT DESCRIPTION
•• )1 lI5nA4r
P:1133AL SERV1Cti
6105 541441ES AND 4AGfS
41IJ NCALTII INSURANCE
-- 6120 HeALTN INSUkANCL - DFOUCTIBLF
5110 4 Erlt.4.41 IYSVAANCE
I bYL•At ,u .1.'aRY .V.TkN
COUMiY I-
Ihte�n•Itu FINAh 14L .YSICM
•
EAPFNDITUltfi GUIOLLINE
AS OF 090
CURRENT ACTUAL
ACTUAL
6404ET TNIt -MONTH
VEAR -tO -DATE
•
TOTAL
PERSONAL SERVICES
•
110 NAft*IALS
2 1,000.10
--
420a
OJOAS - ADULT
14
S.1J
401AS a CHIL1Afft
1,6S.64
$215
GENtRAL Rtfk
1111
S.24
P441301.ALS
5 ..962.69
6 225
PA.PHLEIS
76.325.67
S23J
504CN LIBRARY NATTRtALS
1111
6215
CAIPPEVA COUNTY LIRRARY RATt RtALS
!).646.9.
4444
• JVIEVIJFU NATEAI►LS
J4. OJ n,OJ
424$
1.44 FINS
26. 26P. 34
Si'J
V1340 TAPCS
1.153.60
S245
AUP0 D14CS AN) TAPtS
42
S24J
SLTJFS AND FIN STRIPS
15,264.19
1262
MICAFURNS
I40. 0u
60J
9140161
•
TOTAL
NATERLALS
•
12. CATALOGING
-
S310
7CLC AN0 JTNfR 4NAR4FS
997.42
" 21
Cam VfrJ7A CNAR.fS
•
TOTAL
CATALOGING
1,240.65
.30 V4 QCLF3
st
S354
DPFAATIJN ;NO M:IhTENANGE
1.400.DU
AJSU
TANCE
S. OUO.4.
A.174
A4nAN1Ai11A TION
-
TOTAL
VeH1CLSS _
- - •
I" CJNNUNICAt TON
251.30
S-10
I4Le•HIME AND LINT CHAR:ES
-
4121
14•AtNAL RAINTONANCF
_ --
403.
PJSIA4F, 440 SRIPPIN.. _
•
TOTAL
COMMUNICATION
•
ISJ f.UI'RENT
Sls.SL
761.49
44S5
Nto - WIPREN7
,t
.4.44
•/V E40IPMGNT .._ -..
29
4474
9 AINTeMANCE AND CONTRACTS
_•.
_TOTAL
EQUIPMENT..
- •
164 OTHER
9,106.42
3615
CJ$TOOf AL SuP✓IIFa AND E2ufPNLNI
40.609.00
45IJ
SU•PLIES AND 11IMT116
- ---
Sala
PA3n0T1JNAL AND PAOGRANMING
1.025.66
6S ?J
•1LEAGF AND MEETINGS - STA•F
12
S522
NIL4A4E AND MEFTINGf - TRUSIFLS
-
Assi
PNOf. MENVFASNIPS (TROSIFES)
S. DV D.DJ
SS/2
l4SJR4NCf
6.000..00
6240
AD' ANO LAGAI 4JTIC2S
-
6S4a
A431TAN,.
26
4540
6J1A5k P)ENG
•
4SSS
C34TINu1NG tOuCAT1ON
1.000.00
65So
SCHOLARSHIP FUND
99S.u0
!Stir
P4TCNS?J4 C0
9
TOTAL
OTHER
•
0u SPECT.L
-
SOW
Gu E1FC0E faliMJS. 1903
st
442J
9CNL
$49.90
4011
LJCAL E4UIPRENt
--
4950
STATE SAL45 AR
1.000.00
6
.
FAMILf TINS FUND
1.591.60
5470. ,
LA PAINT Fuvo
63
TOTAL
SPECIAL
-4•
EOTAL
LIBMAI
600 FINAL TOTALS N ACCOUNTS
95.99
BALANCE
LEFT OM NAND
APRIL 1990
IFSI63 PAGE 1
PERCENT OF TEAM 6)4
EDET - ACT
DIFFERENCE Ott
715.340.04
60,604.21
262,50.21
572.614.79
33
2 1,000.10
!,.434.43
7,036.96
13,943.04
14
3.604,0.
1,124.2♦
1,6S.64
1.954.34
46
J
6,S1S.19
25.
5 ..962.69
34
ouO.324.00
76.325.67
29
601.315.06
33
129.000.00
3.$06.24
!).646.9.
16.155.06
20
J4. OJ n,OJ
3.2$6.46
9,710.6
26. 26P. 34
27
11,1Jn.n,
1.153.60
6.7UG.26
9,293.76
42
26. 7430. DO
15U. /0
15,264.19
11.495.al
$I
I40. 0u
.00
.00
300.00
p
1,576.0.
49.64
226.51
1,349.46
19
.9,25S.P0
997.42
4.26.00
14,969.00
24
0.3J0,n0
466.04
1,240.65
8,141.35
st
.0.0.10
.00
1.400.DU
4,200.04
63
S. OUO.4.
342.43
2,766.07
4,213.91.
s9
400.10
.00
166.70
251.30
It
b1.Ou
.00
.OJ
2SO.00
0
1.00;1
.00
24.95
275.05
6
1,100.0o
216.51
Sls.SL
761.49
22
246.411.00
12.493.64
70.261.64
174.167.36
29
16.6u6.34
.00
6.616.00
9.792.00
41
44,001.10
2.396.)2
9,106.42
,I ♦.a91. SR
$6
40.609.00
2,196612
19.022.42
- 24.63.50
.79
14.600.30
1.025.66
4,654.70
9.945.70
12
!,41 S.nJ
.00
[.623.92
1.791..05
N
S. DV D.DJ
.00
.00
6.000..00
0
26.013.00
1.025.96
6.278.22
19,136.74
26
9,00n.nu
976.17
3,139.41
5.440.59
40
1.000.00
.Uo
1.00
99S.u0
1
,2,71S.0J
644.60
3,421.63
9,291.17
21
42.7Is.00
1,820.97
6,986.06
13,726.96
st
7.4,5.0.
36A.9S
$49.90
2.303.10
21
1,000.00 -
- .6
.60
1.000.00
0
0.00n.DU
1.591.60
12.44.29
2 {516.71
63
18,655.00 -
1.967.65
13.013.19
5.641.61
TO
1.5u9.0u
95.99
520.39
179.61
35
.7.494.90
2.5t2. 50
10,629.8?
16. 466. I1
39
1,040.00
339.17
819.66
320.34,
6s
6,000.1.
656.46
2,42S.06
3.574.92
40
4,0uO.00
64..40
1.36.40
2 . 69.90
36
4DO.04
.00
26.00
L12.00
72
11,540.04
1
10.627.00
4100
N -.
I0.40
.00
.00
104.00
O
1.SUO.34
.6
.00
1.$04.00
_ D
7.000.00
225.90
a#&. Do
2,100.01
30
500.00
650.00
674.00
174.00-
1)6
I.CUC.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
0.
1
3.304.00
3,300.00
7.200.00
- 31
64,494.00
6.542.22
31,604.40
36,69.•0
46
1,399.!10
.00
.00
1.189.00
O
2,714.00
- .00
SO.OJ
.2,666.00
2
2.000.10
2.072.50
2.072.96
72.50-
104
•,090.34
523.45
714.43
1.461.55
17
5.041.0.
100.65
3,191.04
1.649.96
67
I.9vA.04
26S.43
1.464.31
513.69
71
15,144.00
2,962.23
7.716.30
7,421.10.
at
1,336,386.00
Lm,s76.6
446,993.15
6T,392.61
34
1.336.166.00
107,576.46
466,99). l3
667.192.05
36
$236,903.42
$236,903.42
1.'/ ,)144 ar
S /07 /90
I4r 297 UNn
rlu4,'.L.40 Lre'Adr .Y.i ♦M
1144GK41tr tlnAh.1AL "LM
REVENUE GUIOELIK
LF1161 PAIL
PLALENT OF 9EA3
#DST - ACT
DIFFERENCE ►Cr
�,- 96 O1
L18AAAY
viol BASIC STATE/FEOERAL no
9110 91G STONE COUNTY
IPF LaUR Y-
5120 SANJTVONI COUNTY
SL24 LAC SUT PARLF CUUNTY
5 175 NC L F -,O
311,0,)0,00
22,069.00
_ , .14,]22.00
112,454.OJ
30,4�
.00
5,521.15
_ 18,31 ,).50 _
20,11!.50
1,61!.75
67,OV6.01
11,044.47
_ 37,161.00
56,227.nu
15,227.Su
4
_.
$190.
NEEKEA COUNTY
60, ?b4. DO
17.071.00
34,142.oJ
•
S1S2
'REMVTLLE COUNTY
SS,336.00
7.185.10
14.571.')0
a
9uA
1NIFI ,w,,TV
1.360.00-
.- 4.64U.00_. __._.._17.200.0,)
1.155.00
51
IIS7
YtLLOW NEDILIMF CUUNTY
34�All.OJ
x,!01.,)0
1 ?,5,)2.00
J
5140
APPLFTON
9,305.00
27,S14.00
4.552.50
41
tlaf
A vzw _
1D.6N9.9 J.
Y.uSC.1S
�.S Y4.SJ
�
S1S0
GLENCDE
16,4'5.00
0..,00.2
13.719.SU
h" '•
5LIS
ORACEVILLE -
3 67S.OU.
966.75
1.937.50
y 3.
S1S1
Ga 4N1fLEALLL__.._.___�_. __. ._..._.
.. __._- .__21.1Y 5.00 _
..._ 7.[96.73 ..
10, 59 So
S /6U
NJTC4I4S3N
57, 5Y6.OJ
14.r2r.00
18, 444. 0,)
S165
KLRKHJVEN
3,90
097.J0
1.994. 1J
3120-
LITL NF_Irt. , _._ . - _, -__.. _. _
___. 41,652.
_.____. 1V, 453.00 ... _..
[J,9[6. 0J
5172
OL TV TA
19,912.OJ
4.98,).51
9,961.OU
M a l 1. ,
kl
505
DKTONVILLE
12,766.00
J,197.00
6.394.Ou
SiAd
1lL.N,►1L__.___
... ,2.0]0.00 _.
-_.._ 2].01450
46.0[5.00
5165
R1Rx LSLANO
4,654.nJ
d.0j.SO
4,447.01
5190
O.J.V4
12.64 ?.0J
J. L-0. S0
N.311.nJ
CP
0.74 T.flJ..__._
_.1,736.15.
3,913.5J
9200
, 1015011
14,345.00
.00
1. RV1.75
,�1•,
9205
RtAVILLE
9,961.00
1,490.15
4,900.5.)
9410
CA SH 6see 1 1T iLSALES_.LE. _. ._
_:.. _._: .__ 46.900.00 -_
___ 5,466.30.
17,057.4d
5424
GLFIS
1,000.00
1.650.00
1,850.0,)
%41J
1.9T4RLSF
7,SU0,9J
604.10
2,4v3.7?
IOTA
AECFTPTS
l46.VO4.U0
11,044.53
31. 161.UO
So.17J.JO
0.221.50
36.114.50
14. L4[. JO
4,., 767.00
17,[9u.00
2[. ln4.u*
r, 654. 5n
/. 164.50
IJ,111. 30
4.91/. YO
1J, 591.
2u. 9 4 U. Un
1,Y94.J0
2J.Y29.9l
9.961.00
6,394.00
1. J0
6,)7 1.,)0
3,u 73.50
10. 77$.75
4.)RJ.SO
7Y.4a[.i2
6
5.uO6.
736,90tl.Y5
25
5U
SO
51
51
5J
54
26
Su
30
SJ
5J
SJ
SO
50
SO
S,)
SJ
SU
Su
50
SJ
SU
5J
25
54
17
195
1J
41
BUSERE ILDCAL r_OURRwwcr ____
_
�17,01R.OJ
._2,2.0.1•
117.05
76
404SUA5ERENTS - L4IPPE6A CUUNTY
2,956.00
16, u14. .)0
16,014.Ou
16.V10. JO
F1
PL1ARJR1FMFNT6 - RFNSUN (MATEMTALS ONLY)
1,574.9,)
.un
I, SUO. 00
74. f)
95
SL1_S - CHIPPp VA CnJMrY (RAr iarLL am, Y1
_19.253.07-
_ _. ..UO _.
_ _10.owo.00
1.155.00
51
REIMS - NONTEYT0E0 (RATWAIALS ONLY)
13,601.OU
.00
.00
13,601.00
J
REIMSUSSNENTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT)
66.460.00
16,014.00
27,S14.00
38.946.00
41
x.n u:rwR,1S SFwcwri
2.950.3,) __�_3SL
75 _._... __.
._2,2.0.1•
117.05
76
TWAL OTHER RRIMSUMSeMINTS
1„
2,956.00
551.75
2,250.14
707.06
76
OSO Of-lift FUNJs
6910 SLFNCJE FUND
- -- -- - - ----
1, 3YO.OJ -
-. __.
.10
.9J
1.190. 1n
J.
192II_ 5-8,. -._.
5 ...71.7- .1,
_. ...
.. .Oa
1.117. xJ
u
SITS L•JCAL FJUIPNENT
7.000.0,)
.u0
.OJ
1,UOJ.u9
J
1.r RYALL FANNY fl-S Fd
_ ._.3,04 -.ON -._-
_ . 00 .. _.._
.91
5.J4e.0n
0
9940 LARGE PRINT FU-40
1.9V9.00
Do
.04
1,990.00
U
9950 SALES TAX
I.noo.0U
.00
.OU
2,400.09
J
15..168.00.. ._.
.00
.Do
is.146.JO
0
�>w *trAA 989A1c a Aerwr99 .
"m EIPTS AND BALANCE
4.- OESCRIPT WN CURRENT ACTUAL ACTUAL
_._- BUDGET.___:_ fULS -RUNIN. .. _YEAR -TO -DATE
LANCE CARRIED FORWARD $100,770.42 $143,296.46
SA01
Solo
.'IuVII ,.
AS JF 4/90
7BV.6A __.._:.344,680.09
__ - 7NS,7R9.6S _. !66,680.09
$667.976.57
791,709.Y1 41 ..
791.709.91 41
I
c
P
6 030 Of9tP 4EIN6JAfEMFNTS
.. .. .. 5� Y 4 .., .rs .:'fi a. 1^.w 3:• 9 1 "SiRk.I
2 Col. X 5"
Boxed Ad
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
P U B L I C N O T I C E
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
JUNKER SANITATION SERVICES
5:00 P.M.
MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1990
0
The City Council of the City of Hutchinson will meet to hold a
Board of Review on Junker Sanitation services at City Hall.
The Board of Review will allow any and all residential and commer-
cial establishments to review their commercial rates with the City Council
and Junker Sanitation.
PUBLICATION NO. 4128
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 1990
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
JUNHER SANITATION
ANAYLSIS OF PROPOSED INCREASE
MAY 16, 1990
INCREASE OF 50 CENTS TO COVER JLLY 1 _NCREASE
TOTAL NUMBER OF BILLINGS
RESIDENTIAL
C'071MERICIAL
CURRENT
PER MONTH CHARGE
JLNKER RECEIVES
RETAINED PY CITY
;_% DFI LL CHARGES
1988 TOTAL CUBIC YARDS
NEW LANDFILL COST
PER MONTH COST
3459
3221
235
12.'05
11.90
0.15
31,967.00 10.00
ime
NUMBER OF
CCST MOXTHS
15,983.50 12.00
66 PERCENT RESIDENTIAL 10,645.01
33 PERCENT COMMERICAL 5
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL COST 3.30
TOTAL RESIDENT COST INCREASE BY : OF ACCOUNTS
COST PER MONTH
3.30 DIVIDED BY 12 MONTHS
319.670.00
335.653.50
15.983.50
1,331.96,
0.28
•
0
LA BORE & GIuuAm, LTD.
•
LEE L. LA BORE
EMILIO R. GIULIANI
BRADLEY T. COSGRIFF
MICHAEL T. HUGHES
STEVEN L. VILTOFT
LEGAL ASSISTANTS:
MICHELE M. HUOINS %I
JAN SAUER
June 11, 1990
SUITE 150
HOPKINS OFFICE CENTER
33 SOUTH TENTH AVENUE
P.O. BOX 70
HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343 -0070
TELEPHONE 1612) 933 -3371
FAX(612)933 -8298
Dear Menbers of the City Counsel and Staff of the City of Hutchinson:
Enclosed please find Mr. Junker's expenses for last year and requested rate increase.
Starting July 1, 1990 will start the third year that his employees have not had
• an increase in salary and furthermore, there are two very old 25 yard compactors
that will need replacing, a 1978 Mack and a 1980 Ford.
Thank you for your consideration and I hope you will look favorably upon this rate
increase.
Yours truly,
Lee L. La Bore
on bahalf of Janes Junker d/b /a
Junker Sanitation
LLL /y£
Enclosure
•
I. Expenses
Salaries
Casual Labor
Payroll Taxes
Truck Expenses
Repairs, Parts, Replacement & Dump Services
Supplies
Building Maintenance
Claims Reserve
Advertising
Donations
Dues and Miscellaneous
Insurance
Legal Account
Licenses
Medical
Rentals Building and Equipment
• Utilities and Telephone
Office Bookeeping
D- preciation
ErTployee Retirement Plan
Interest
Corporation Taxes
Entertainment
Profit 12%
TOTAL
$137,884.00
$ 550.00
$ 12,836.00
$ 41,886.00
$ 15,500.00
$ 558.00
$ 5,734.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 606.00
$ 750.00
$ 410.00
$ 26,890.00
$ 6,450.00
$ 3,591.00
$ 10,220.00
$ 25,050.00
$ 4,937.00
$ 4,350.00
$ 45,000.00
$ 4,500.00
$ 5,735.00
$ 92.00
$ 1,650.00
$ 42,741.00
$398,920.00
II. Dunn Fees
Estimate - 30,000 yards @ $14.00 per yard plus $2.00 tax yard =
30,000 x $16.00 = $480.000.00
III. Total - $398,920.00 Expenses
• $480,000.00 Dump fees
$878,920.00
I
VI. Commercial Represents 30%
$878,920.00 x 300 = $263,676.00
$878,920.00 Total
$263,676.00 Commercial
$615,676.00
V. Number of Monthly Billinqs - 3459
Residential
3294
Duplex
96
Senior Citizens
60
Three Plex
9
VI, Monthly Rate on Last Year's Expenses
$615,676.00 divided by 3459 = $14.83 per month
VII. Anticipated Increase in Expenses
a) Salaries - $7,500.00 as of July 1, 1990, it will make the third year without
a salary increase;
b) There are two 25 yard compactors which need replacement;
1) a 1978 Mack
2) a 1980 Ford ($200,000.00)
c) There are five pickup trucks one needs replacing in 1990 and another in
• 1991. ($30,000.00)
d) b and c allocated over six years
$230,000.00 divided by 6 = $38,333.
VIII. $38,333.00 trucks
$ 7,500.00 salaries
$45,833.00 divided by 3459 = $1.35.
Requested increase Is $16.18.
J