Loading...
cp06-26-1990 cHUTCH INSON CITY CALENDAR WEEK OF .Tune 24 T 0 June 30 f 1990, I WEDNESDAY _27- SUNDAY -24- THURSDAY -28- 8:00 A.M. - Regional Rail 10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting - Authority Meeting at City Hall I at Victorian Inn 5:00 P.M. - Park & Recreatio Board Meeting at Library Conferen Room Noon - Nursing Home Board Meeting at Burns Manor MONDAY -25- TUESY -26 Noon - Safety Council Meeting at Heritage Center 1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commis- sion Meeting at Utilities 8:00 P.M. - Airport Commission) Meeting at City Hall FRIDAY -29- 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall SATURDAY -30- VACATION: GEORGE FIELD - June 25 - 29 RANDY DEVRIES - June 25 - July 6 5 ,_�___N JOLEEN RUNKE - June 25 - 29 . AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 26, 1990 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Lavern Johnson, Bethlehem United Methodist Church 3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of June 11, 1990 and Board of Review of June 11, 1990 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Financial Report - May 1990 2. Planning Commission Minutes - May 15, 1990 3. Nursing Home Board Minutes - May 23 & June 5, 1990 4. Hospital Board Minutes - June 7, 1990 (b) Reduced Trash And Refuse Rate Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and approve reduced rate 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. (a) Assessment Roll No. 260 - Letting No. 4, Project No. 90 -03 Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 260 and award contract - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9279 & No. 9280 (b) Assessment Roll No. 259 - Letting No. 5, Project No. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18 Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 259 and award contract - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9281 & No. 9282 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 26, 1990 (c) Assessment Roll No. 261 - Letting No. 13, Project No. 90 -23 Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Assessment Roll No. 261 - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9286 (d) Improvement No. 90 -20, Letting No. 10 (South Fork Crow River Dam) Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and order preparation of plans and specifications - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9285 ri Communications. Reouests And Petitions (a) Update By Director of Engineering Regarding Right -of- Way Acquisition for "Hole In Hill" Property Action - (b) Review of Workman's Compensation And Liability Insurance Coverages By Agent Dennis Potter Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 7 Resolutions And Ordinances (a) Resolution No. 9288 - Resolution Adopting 457 Generic Deferred Compensation Plan Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (b) Ordinance No. 90 -21 - Ordinance Amending Chapter 12, Subdivision Regulations (Platting) Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive second reading and adopt (c) Ordinance No. 90 -22 - Amending Gambling Ordinance Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first reading and set second reading July 10, 1990 • 0 6 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 26, 1990 8. Unfinished Business (a) Consideration of Hutchinson Huskies Baseball Association Proposal to Operate A Beer Concession At Roberts Park During Softball Season (DEFERRED 6- 11 -90) Action - (b) Consideration of Rate Adjustments Requested By Junker Sanitation (DEFERRED JUNE 11, 1990) Action - 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service 0 (b) Presentation By Jay Beytien And Director Dolf Moon On Purchase of Christmas Decorations Action - (c) Consideration of Name Change of Orchard Park To Elks Park Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9289 (d) Consideration of Accepting Bid Pack One for Hospital Expansion Project Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (e) Consideration of Special City Council Meeting On July 17, 1990 To Open Bids for 1990 Improvement Projects And Hospital Bonds Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (f) Consideration of Recommendation for 1990 Departmental Budget Cuts Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JUNE 26, 1990 . (g) Consideration of Time Table for 1991 Budget Action - (h) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 7 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve preparation of assessment roll #262 and hold hearing - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9283 & No. 9284 (i) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit To Move Manufactured Home Requested By Norm Ponsford With Split Vote of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution (j) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Garage . Addition Requested By Bob Hall with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9287 (k) Consideration of Variance To Reduce Frontyard Setback for Deck Addition With Roof Requested By Vern Breljie with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (1) Consideration of Temporary Recycling Site Collection with Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - (m) Consideration of Lot Split In Woodview Acres Requested By Roxanne Kokesh (Two Mile Radius) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County 1] 4 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - NNE 26, 1990 (n) Consideration of Accepting Bid for Ultrasound Equipment for Hutchinson Community Hospital Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (o) Consideration of Accepting Anesthesia Bid With Related Monitoring Equipment for Hutchinson Community Hospital Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator 11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from • appropriate funds 12. Adjournment 11 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1990 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ack- land. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. 2. INVOCATION In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of May 22, 1990 and bid openings of May 30, May 31 and June 5, 1990 were approved as distributed. 4. ROUTINE ITEMS (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS • 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - MAY 1990 2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES - APRIL 25, 1990 3. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES - MAY 23, 1990 (b) REQUEST FOR USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE ON SEPTEMBER 9, 1990 BY CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN CHURCH The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to order the report and minutes filed and approve use of Library Square. (c) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE Mayor Ackland presented Larry Romo with an apprecia- tion plaque for serving on a City board. 5. PUBLIC HEARING None. 6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS i R CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 9 (a) REPORT FROM LIQUOR STORE MANAGER REGARDING VOLUME OF TRANSACTIONS DURING SELECTED HOURS AND RECOMMENDATION OF OPERATING HOURS AT LIQUOR STORE The Liquor Store Manager recommended that effective Monday, July 9, the store opening hours be changed to 10:00 A.M. on Mondays through Thursdays and open at 8:00 A.M. on Fridays and Saturdays, with discretion to make exceptions on holidays. The new hours would re- duce the staff duty hours. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ac- cept the recommendation of the Liquor Store Manager. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION NO. 9274 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by . Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive read- ing and adopt. (b) ORDINANCE NO. 90 -21 - ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (PLATTING) Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to waive first reading of amended ordinance and set second read- ing for June 26, 1990. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY HARVEY GETZ TO MOVE 12' X 16' UTILITY SHED WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION (DEFERRED MAY 22, 1990) Building Official Jim Marka recommended to approve the 12' X 16' utility shed and to amend Section 8 of the zoning ordinance to increase area limitations of utili- ty buildings to 192 square feet. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the Building Official's recommendation and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9278 issuing a condi- tional use permit. Motion seconded by Alderman Erick- dA5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 son and unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF EVACUATION PLAN FOR COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE MOBILE HOME PARK (DEFERRED MAY 22, 1990) Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to table until an evacuation plan is submitted. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF MOBILE SCRAP YARDS (DEFERRED 5- 22 -90) The Building Official recommended that the Planning Commission address the issue and amend the zoning ordi- nance to permit "temporary land usage for recyclable material collection" in the appropriate district(s). Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to refer the matter to the Planning Commission. Motion second- ed by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF TENNIS ASSOCIATION REQUEST TO WAIVE FEE FOR USE OF RECREATION CENTER Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve waiving fee. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF HUTCHINSON HUSKIES BASEBALL ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL TO OPERATE A BEER CONCESSION AT ROBERTS PARK DURING SOFTBALL SEASON The motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Ald- erman Torgerson, to approve a beer concession at Rob- erts Park. Alderman Lenz amended the motion for ap- proval to include that the Baseball Association was to meet City requirements for gram shop insurance. Amend- ed motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and failed by three to two with roll call vote of Aldermen Lenz and Torgerson voting aye and Aldermen Mlinar, Erickson and Mayor Ackland voting nay. Following a discussion of the amount of liability in- surance coverage needed, proper storage of the beer when not being sold, and the concern of minor access, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson to table un- til the next meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Qcis CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 9 Lenz and unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF SKATEBOARD PETITION TO PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD Director Dolf Moon reported on the petition and costs of constructing a skateboard ramp, etc. He stated the issue was still being researched. Following discus- sion, no action was taken. (d) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF GENERIC DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN PREPARED BY CITY ATTORNEY Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve plan and refer to the I.R.S. for review and approval. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 115 GLEN STREET 0 Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimous- ly carried, to approve advertisement for bids. (f) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION BY CITY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE FOR EXPANDING RECYCLING PROGRAM It was the recommendation of the Solid Waste Management Committee to continue recycling drop boxes at the Civic Arena and Super America locations, to continue curbside pick -up in precinct #4 with increased education and awareness programs, and to expand curbside pick -up into precinct #1. The estimated monthly cost would be $1,682. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove the Committee recommendation. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. (g) CONSIDERATION OF HUTCHINSON BINGO OPERATION FOR HUTCH SWIM CLUB /TENNIS ASSOCIATION AND AMENDMENT TO EXISTING GAMBLING ORDINANCE Atty. Neil Jensen requested an amendment to the exist- ing ordinance which would allow the Swim Club and Ten- nis Association to establish a bingo operation in a -4- 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 leased facility. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove amending the gambling ordinance. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar seconded the motion and unanimously carried. The City Attorney was directed to draft the amended ordinance. (h) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT NO. 90 -03 Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the preparation of assessment roll No. 260, to hold hearing on June 26, 1990 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9268 and No. 9269. Motion seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried. (i) CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LETTING NO. 11, PROJECT NO. 90 -21 Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to ap- prove, to award contract to Hanson & Vasek Construc- tion for $27,501.90, and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9270. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (j) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL AND SETTING ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 13, PROJECT NO. 90 -23 Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve preparation of assessment roll No. 261, to hold hearing on June 26, 1990 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9271 and No. 9272. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. (k) CONSIDERATION OF ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT, LETTING NO. 10, PROJECT NO. 90 -20 (SOUTH FORK CROW RIVER DAM) Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove preparation of report, to hold a hearing on June 26, 1990 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9273. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. -5- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 (1) (m) (n) (o) (p) CONSIDERATION OF 3M SOLVENT RECOVERY UNIT WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT ADDENDUM Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove the permit addendum. Motion seconded by Alder- man Lenz and unanimously carried. CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME REMODELING PROJECT Design Dimensions presented a recommendation for award- ing bids on the interior design and construction work at Burns Manor Nursing Home. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove and award the recommended contracts. Motion sec- onded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FOR RECLASSIFICATION OF PARK DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE POSITION Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the reclassification. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO YOUTH CENTER Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove transfer of $23,000 from the General Fund to the Youth Center Special Revenue Fund and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9275. Motion seconded by Ald- erman Mlinar and unanimously carried. CONSIDERATION OF CALLING FOR BIDS ON 1990 IMPROVEMENT BONDS Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Coun- cil to approve installation of residential street light poles on Hwy. 15 North. Bond Consultant Bill Fahey presented the $2,110,000 bond issue. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the sale of 1990 G.O. improvement bonds, to open bids on July 17, 1990 at 3:30 P.M., and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9276. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. • 0 • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 (q) CONSIDERATION OF FINANCING RESOLUTION FOR HOSPITAL BOND ISSUE Bond Consultant Fahey reported that the two hospital issues had been combined into one bond for $3,125,000 G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1990A and $3,150,000 G.O. Taxable Medical Facilities Bonds, Series 1990. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove the sale of hospital bonds, to open bids on July 17, 1990 at 3:30 P.M., and to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9277. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR City Administrator Plotz reported on a meeting held today with the owner of the Cold Storage building as well as two upcoming meetings regarding the proposed Shopko site. Also, the soil borings, well monitoring on several properties, and ground water contamination testing had been completed. PACE Laboratories has completed the specifications for asbestos removal work, with a bid date of July 16, 1990 at 10:00 A.M. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to ap- prove advertising for asbestos removal work and to open bids on July 16, 1990 at 10:00 A.M. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM FINANCE DIRECTOR Director Kenneth B. Merrill stated that the directors were preparing proposals for department cuts in the 1990 adopted budget. He also commented on the City's cost for workman's compensation. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CRAIG LENZ Alderman Lenz inquired about the compost dump and its success. -7- (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR Alderman Mlinar commented on the detour traffic through -7- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 0 Clifton Heights and on Hilltop Drive and the dust in the area as a result. He expressed appreciation for the signage on Michigan Avenue and suggested three stop signs at Hilltop Drive and Paul's Road and one stop sign at Garden Road and Hilltop Drive. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to authorize four stop signs, with locations to be determined by the Engineering Department. Alderman Mlinar commented on City up of fallen branches caused by a quired about the railroad car on commented about the status of the man Mlinar requested that someone garding its decomposting plan. policy regarding pick storm. He also in- the trail. He further fair grounds. Alder - check with Delano re- (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON Alderman Torgerson commented on fallen branches in • Miller's Woods. He suggested the City spray the park with Round -Up and ask the County to plant wild flowers in the wooded area and on either side of the bridge. This would reduce the required mowing, cut down on maintenance costs and wear - and -tear on equipment, and also provide a nesting area. (f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN DON ERICKSON Alderman Erickson asked about street I.D. signs and City policy on replacement. He stated that some of the signs are faded and hard to read, especially the one on Griffin Avenue North. (g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF Engineer John Rodeberg commented on Second Avenue North stop light. The City will receive SO percent cost share with MN /DOT and could possibly receive state aid funding. He will bring a schedule of cost sharing to the next Council meeting. It was reported that the service road on Hwy. 7 East was to be put in soon; however, the rain had delayed the milling machine from removing the surface, widen- ing the road and planing it. 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JUNE 11, 1990 Engineer Rodeberg stated there were still problems with the county ditch. The county has directed the City to proceed with necessary work, and it will pay for re- pairs out of the available ditch funds. The contractor doing work on Carlisle Street would like to wait another month to complete the project. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve and authorize payment from the appropriate funds. 12. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:20 P.M. L-1 9 • • MINUTES BOARD OF REVIEW MONDAY, JUNE 11, 1990 The Board of Review for Junker Sanitation services was held on Monday, June 11, 1990 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Don Erickson and Marlin Torgerson (arrived at 5:15 P.M.). Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Manager Wayne Al- brecht and Attorney Lee La Bore, representing Junker Sanitation. No residential or commercial user was present to be heard regard- ing refuse service. Attorney Lee La Bore presented a 1989 expense report from Junker Sanitation and requested a rate increase for 1990. He stated that the employees had not received a salary increase in three years. Also, Junker needed to replace some equipment and vehi- cles. Mayor Ackland stated he was in support of a rate increase to go into effect July 1, 1990; however, he was not sure of the amount at this time. The problem at Country Club Terrace Trailer Court was addressed. No solution was reached. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to close the Board of Review at 5:45 P.M. and defer a decision on the rate increase un- til the June 26, 1990 meeting. Motion seconded by Alderman Tor - gerson and unanimously carried. 1i KAY CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - 1990 MAY ENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE MAY BATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 450,000.00 465,930.83 1,518,179.00 1,052,248.17 30.7% LICENSES 20.00 8,173.00 18,950.00 10,777.00 43.1% PERMITS AtiD FEES 8,302.66 61,683.52 91,300.00 29,616.48 67.6% INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE 6,654.10 105,618.561,476,380.00 1,370,761.44 7.2% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 54,394.74 182,382.35 532,699.00 350,316.65 34.2% FINES & FORFEITS 5,656.70 18,309.95 45,500.00 27,190.05 40.2% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 23,685.63 77,211.46 122,600.00 45,388.54 63.0% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 990.00 89,990.00 426,000.00 336,010.00 21.1% REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES 609.27 1,041.45 250.00 (791.45) 416.6% TOTAL 550,313.10 , 1,010,341.12 4,231,858.00 3,221,516.88 23.9% EXPENSE REPORT GENERAL FUND MAYOR & COUNCIL 2,835.07 18,164.83 36,476.00 18,311.17 49.8% CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK 12,786.56 69,632.07 154,200.00 84,567.93 45.2% ELECTIONS 19.29 2,852.31 7,230.00 4,377.69 39.5% FINANCE 3,282.60 122,832.97 237,955.00 115,122.03 51.6% MOTOR VEHICLE 5,693.01 32,275.48 70,835.00 38,559.52 45.6% ASSESSING 0.00 0.00 20,700.00 20,700.00 0.0% 4,789.28 16,945.78 41,000.00 24,054.22 41.3% O AL NNING 2,747.57 4,016.59 7,800.00 3,783.41 51.5% CITY HALL 2,603.15 16,248.61 43,021.00 26,772.39 37.8% RECREATION BUILDING 4,551.55 18,921.37 58,382.00 39,460.63 32.4% POLICE DEPARTMENT 78,470.88 441,927.24 914,916.00 472,988.76 48.3% FIRE DEPARTMENT 8,887.67 37,391.82 109,560.00 72,168.18 34.1% SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER 170.36 5,242.48 25,213.00 19,970.52 20.8% BUILDING INSPECTION 7,277.54 28,022.74 64,493.00 36,470.26 43.5% EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 0.00 60.75 7,698.00 7,637.25 0.8% SAFETY COUNCIL 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.0% FIRE MARSHALL 4,199.76 21,069.88 47,965.00 26,895.12 43.9% ENGINEERING 17,568.68 96,243.89 234,057.00 137,813.11 41.1% STREETS & ALLEYS 27,840.01 145,704.30 399,123.00 253,418.70 36.5% STREET MAINTENANCE A/C 10,144.19 30,536.05 73,100.00 42,563.95 41.8% LIBRARY 651.45 32,709.87 68,996.00 36,286.13 47.4% SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 8,291.34 34,348.14 81,291.00 46,942.86 42.3% PARK /REC. ADMIN. 6,720.57 42,350.83 99,496.00 57,145.17 42.6% RECREATION 8,689.16 41,923.86 159,947.00 118,023.14 26.2% CIVIC ARENA 7,135.37 60,085.04 109,753.00 49,667.96 54.7% PARK DEPARTMENT 32,286.86 156,269.10 428,262.00 271,992.90 36.5% CEMETERY 3,954.13 16,428.40 51,708.00 35,279.60 31.8% CO'N,UNITY DEVELOPMENT 3,528.03 15,833.45 32,170.00 16,336.55 49.2% CELEBRATE 1990 GRANT 0.00 456.30 0.00 (456.30) ERR DEBT SERVICE 10,000.00 16,000.00 53,287.00 37,287.00 30.0% AIRPORT 17,648.66 177,539.68 53,387.00 (124,152.68) 332.6% m \SIT N GY 8,800.18 46,275.33 129,784.00 83,508.67 35.7% W COUNCIL 0.00 1,307.40 14,642.00 13,334.60 8.9% S.C.D.P. COORDINATRO 61,812.79 144,712.91 33,589.00 (111,123.91) 0.0% UNALLOCATED 22,920.38 85,034.68 361,570.00 276,535.32 23.5% TOTAL 386,306.09 1,979,364.15 4,231,856.00 2,252,491.85 46.8% MAY V ENUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1990 MAY ENTERPRISE FUNDS CURRENT YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE MONTH DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED LIQUOR SALES 34,319.43 165,780.62 435,000.00 269,219.38 38.1% WINE SALES 10,182.58 44,060.24 151,000.00 106,939.76 29.2% BEER SALES 64,130.04 264,354.52 701,400.00 437,045.48 37.7% BEER DEPOSITS (101.94) (1,275.26) 0.00 1,275.26 2.4% MISC. SALES 4,710.70 15,776.50 40,895.00 25,118.50 0.0% INTEREST 660.90 2,468.98 6,500.00 4,031.02 38.0% REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.9% CASH DISCOUNTS (53.39) (249.94) (2,100.00) (1,850.06) 0.0% TOTAL 113,848.32 490,915.66 1,332,695.00 841,779.34 36.8 EXPENSE REPORT LIQUOR FUND PERSONEL SERVICES 11,078.71 61,327.30 140,959.00 79,631.70 43.5% SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 224.26 1,739.13 2,800.00 1,060.87 62.1% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 13,337.35 17,857.13 37,200.00 19,342.87 48.0% MISCELLANEOUS 35.00 142.59 6,000.00 5,857.41 2.4% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 208.00 0.00 (208.00) 0.0% TRANSFERS 0.00 0.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 0.0% COST OF SALES 113,134.98 385,625.74 1,017,400.00 631,774.26 37.9% 0 ER 0.00 (3,200.00) (3,200.00) 0.0% TOTAL 137,810.30 466,899.89 1,311,159.00 844,259.11 35.6% REVENUE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND FEDERAL GRANTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% WATER SALES 37,601.93 192,251.92 516,400.00 324,148.08 37.2% WATER METER SALES 165.00 1,050.00 6,500.00 5,450.00 16.2% REFUSE SERVICES 39,542.22 182,668.41 441,203.00 258,534.59 41.4% REFUSE SURCHARGE 3,624.18 10,273.80 0.00 (10,273.80) SEWER SERVICES 124,426.97 623,013.81 1,388,400.00 765,386.19 44.9% PENALTY CHARGES (374.06) 4,923.68 11,000.00 6,076.32 0.0% INTEREST EARNED 30,033.28 48,855.24 160,000.00 111,144.76 30.5% REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 336.00 761.62 8,000.00 7,238.38 0.0% OTHER 137.00 7,706.75 2,000.00 (5,706.75) 385.3% TOTAL 235,492.52 1,071,505.23 2,533,503.00 1,461,997.77 42.3% EXPENSE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND REFUSE 41,748.40 209,170.70 452,300.00 243,129.30 46.2% ER 78,384.15 268,299.22 1,019,479.00 751,179.78 26.3% ER 41,527.92 692,924.40 1,658,117.00 965,192.60 41.8% WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT. 1,989.84 0.00 (1,989.84) TOTAL 161,660.47 1,172,384.16 3,129,896.00 1,957,511.84 37.5% f MAY REVENUE REPORT MEMBERSHIPS ADMISSIONS VIDEO GAMES KIP CANDY CHIPS, ETC, INTEREST BLDG RENTS FUND RAISERS CONTRIBUTIONS TOTAL EXPENSE REPORT PERSONEL SERVICES OPERATING SUPPLIES OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES MISCELLANEOUS • CAPITAL OUTLAY TOTAL YOUTHCTR 18 DATES I CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1990 MAY ENTERPRISE YOUTH CENTER MONTH OF YEAR TO BALANCE PERCENTAGE MAY DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED 10.00 240.00 2,000.00 1,760.00 12.0% 182.00 2,539.00 7,200.00 4,661.00 35.3% 0.00 800.00 800.00 0.0% 52.75 745.44 3,600.00 2,854.56 20.7% 55.05 405.27 3,600.00 3,194.73 11.3% 495.94 1,444.71 1,200.00 (244.71) 120.4% 0.57 112.81 1,000.00 887.19 11.3% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 12,500.00 48,000.00 35,500.00 26.0% 5,796.31 18,092.23 67,400.00 49,307.77 26.8% 2,001.67 11,086.36 27,803.00 16,716.64 39.9% 183.20 1,231.08 6,800.00 5,568.92 18.1% 2,330.05 15,551.11 33,300.00 17,748.89 46.7% 0.00 160.57 1,500.00 1,339.43 10.7% 0.00 591.60 (591.60) 4,514.92 28,620.72 69,403.00 40,782.28 41.2% ATTENDANCE Y.T.D 491 4,428 MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION . Tuesday, May 15, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Clint Gruett at 7 :30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, E1Roy Dobratz, Dean Wood, Craig Lenz, Tom Lyke and Vice Chairman Gruett. Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka and City Engin?er John Rodeberg. 2. MINUTES Mr. Dobratz made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, March 20, 1990 and the special meeting dated Monday, April 30, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY NORM PONSFORD TO MOVE A MANUFACTURED HOME Vice Chairman Gruett reopened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. Building Official Jim Marka stated he has received the necessary documents today but the documents require a Registered Engineer's signature and DAPIA numbers. He will present all information to the State. Staff recommends continuing the hearing and will review with the State. Mr. Ponsford commented on the problems of waiting so long and stated he submitted his application before the requirements came about. Mr. Lee Heinen, 410 School Rd, questioned if property values would drop. Mr. Ebent asked if there would be an attached garage and residing of the house. Mr. Ponsford stated he would paint and retrim the house. Building Official Marka explained the original staff comments were intended for the continuity of the neighborhood. Mr. Ponsford stated the neighboring property owner has the same roof line. He also explained the back door will not work for an attached garage. Discussion followed on attaching the garage and the roof line recommendation i 1 - Q' (2 ) HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5/15/90 Mr. Jack Alf redson, 1235 Roberts, is also concerned about the value of property and the visibility of that corner. Mr. Ponsford again stated his plans are to blend into the neighborhood. Building Official Marka asked the Planning Commission to form a consensus of the continuity of the neighborhood. Mr. Gruett agrees with the neighboring property owners, it doesn't fit the location. Mr. Lyke commented on pride of ownership and it means a lot to any homeowner. He is concerned with the discrimination issue and senses the Ponsfords would not have junky property and is in favor of the conditional use permit. Mr. Ebent stated he is bothered with the continuity issue. He is in favor and agrees with Mr. Lyke. It will be a nice property when finished. Mr. Dobratz agrees with Mr. Lyke and Mr. Ebent on the discrimination issue and is favorable to the request. Mr. Wood stated there are some things that do need to be done to the home and stated it would have a detrimental effect to the value of the neighborhood. He is not in favor of the request. Mr. Lenz commented he is not convinced the home would fit the neighborhood and would not be in favor of the request. Building Official Marka stated the sketches are not for a wood foundation so would need new sketches. Mr. Lyke moved to continue the hearing to the June meeting, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried unanimously. (b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE AMERICAN LEGION TO MOVE A 10X12 UTILITY SHED Vice Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:10 p.m. with the reading of publication #4114 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3, 1990. The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to allow the owner to move a 10' x 12' utility shed unto property located at 35 -3rd Ave SE. Mr. Roger Olson stated the shed will be moved to the South side. Building Official Marka commented the shed should be 6' off the property line. Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke the hearing closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion 2 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5/15/90 to approve the request subject to staff recommendations of 6' from property lines. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY HARVEY GETZ TO MOVE A 10 UTILITY SHED Vice Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 8:16 p.m. with the reading of publication #4115 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 3, 1990. The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to allow the owner to move a 10'x16' utility shed unto property located at 100 Oakland Ave. Building Official Marka cor- mented on the ordinance limitation of 120 sq. ft. and no larger for moving utility sheds. Mr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:17 p.m. Mr. Ebent moved to deny the 10'x16' shed but would approve a 10 shed. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF DECK ADDITION WITH ROOF REQUESTED BY VERN BRELIJE, 922 HASSAN Mr. Brelije would like to ask for a variance if possible to construct a roof onto the deck. He stated the neighbors do not object. Discussion followed on the set back. Building Official Marka stated a deck alone would not need a variance but adding a roof establishes a building line and requires a variance. Discussion followed on the approval of a variance and general consensus of the commission is to deny the request. The Planning Commission instructed the Building Official review with the owner to establish the setbacks to verify dimensions. (b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN ON ADREY JOHNSON ESTATE REQUESTED BY DAVE LORENCE (2 MILE RADIUS) Mr. Dave Lorence explained the sketch plan. There was discussion on block 1 and the ability to build on the lots. 75' is the minimum setback from shoreline. is Discussion followed on the unusual layout of the roads. 3 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5/15/90 Building Official Marka stated the City and County follow requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. The issue may come up to annex this land into the city. Discussion followed on the desirability of the property. The Planning Commission requested City Engineer John Rodeberg draft a letter to the county and city council stating the 4 main points of the discussion. Mr. Lyke moved to reject the sketch as presented, seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (c) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT OF MILLER TOWNHOUSE 6TH ADDITION Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the plat, seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. (d) DISCUSSION OF REVISED ZONING ORDINANCE WITH BILL WEBER, BRW, INC. Mr. Weber was present to explain the draft. Building Official Marka began by posing 9 questions and asked if the changes could be marked. 1. Keep the same zoning districts 2. Define building line 3. Estimate and establish Shoreland Ordinance and overlay 4. Staff submitted the C -3 sign ordinance 5. Submitted FEMA ordinance with codification of city code 6. Do we want to zone out mobile home prior to 1976 code or not? 7. Mr. Weber will explain differences in parking lot circulation drive 8. Separate recycling of metal 9. Conforming land uses Mr. Weber stated that 95% of draft comments are acceptable and agreeable. He explained R -3 mid or high density is between single family and high density. Could be put next to single family zones. Building Official Marka stated this is what the PUD controls and how would we incorporate on the zoning map. Mr. Weber stated the map does not need to be done now and suggested all attached housing be permitted only by conditional use permit. This creates a zone that doesn't allow apartments but does allow attached housing. Mr. Weber should review and make preliminary recommendations as to where to incorporate the zone. 9 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5/15/90 City Engineer Rodeberg stated that the zone suggested would act as a buffer zone and be reasonable. Discussion followed on the square footage of the townhouses and apartment units. Mr. Weber commented that I -2 does not need to be placed on the map but have it in the ordinance. He also stated the landscaping plan should be presented. Discussion followed on the site plan review and that presently staff reviews. Mr. Weber explained site plans should be carefully reviewed by staff, Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission set a goal to complete draft for Public Hearing by Sept. 1, 1990. (e) DISCUSSION OF GARAGE ADDITION ON MONROE ST Discussion followed on the request of a conditional use permit for a non - conforming building. A suggestion was to move the garage back to permit parking not to block the sidewalk. (f) PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY PLATTING PROCEDURE BY JOHN RODEBERG City Engineer Rodeberg explained the proposed changes. (g) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Building Official Marka commented on a letter by Jay Freedland stating his concerns with recycling aluminum cans in the city. 5. ADJOURMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. 11 5 BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME Minutes - May - 1990 The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home met Thursday, May 23, 1990. Chairperson Jim Mills called the meeting to order at 12:10 p.m. Members present: Jim Mills Kay Peterson Marge Putney Elaine Black Don Erickson Roger Gilmer Robert Koepcke Linda Callier, Assistant Secretary Members absent: Ancher Nelsen Press: Jenny Ingbrigtsen, KDUZ Robin Schoen, Hutchinson Leader Guests: Linda Nelson, Good Neighbor MINUTES REVIEW Minutes of the April 26, 1990 meeting were reviewed. Motion by Don Erickson and seconded by Marge Putney to accept the minutes. All in favor. Motion carried. FINANCIAL REPORT Reviewed preliminary report for April. Report on pending • Medicaid Accounts. Reviewed letter from Director Papin; Accounts have been approved at County level:' Cash flow slowly improving. New Rates set for July 1, 1990. A. $42.02 G. $59.85 B. $45.45 H. $65.68 C. $49.34 I. $67.74 D. $52.88 J. $70.94 E. $56.54 K. $77 69 F. $56.77 Medicare Rate went from $74.00 a day to $65.00 per day, retro to 01 -01 -1990. Discussion followed. Received an additional $60,000.00 from the Zeleny Estate, it is now being handled by Zapp Bank, St. Cloud, who may continue to handle it until maturity. Burns Manor Directors, Church Officials and Memorial Fund Committee will meet to discuss this matter. CAPITAL BILLS Allen Office Products, Inc. $1,390.00 . R & R Interiors 53.50 Anderson Interiors, Inc. 358.20 Lintex 3,840.00 Motion made by Kay Peterson and seconded by Roger Gilmer to pay capital bills. All in favor. Motion carried. May Minutes Page 2 Motion was made by Roger Gilmer and seconded by Elaine Black to approve the signature agreement from Citizens Bank, this allows Burns Manor to use an automatic signature machine. All in favor. Motion carried. CONSTRUCTION BIDS REVIEW Bids will be opened at City Hall on May 31, 1990. A meeting of the BUrns Manor Board of Directors to act on the bids will be held on June 5, 1990 as 4:00 p.m. TAX SHELTERED INSURANCE COMPENSATION Roger GIlmer reported on Colonial Life, has additional benefits, good plan no limit on number of employees needed to start this program. Motio.n made by Don Erickson and seconded by Roger Gilmer to allow Colonial access to Burns Manor employees. Robert will set up a schedule. All in favor. Motion carried. STUDY PROPOSAL BURNS MANOR /HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Merger Discussion followed. It was felt the two Boards should meet before going to Council. Robert will arrange a meeting for the two Boards. No motion made at this time. OPERATIONS UPDATE Standards will be in place by July 1st. By 01 -01 -1990 they will be in full force and effect. EMPLOYEE COMMITTEE Minutes were discussed. Discussion on the Safety incentive program started using Employee Fund money for awards. CENSUS REPORT VOLUNTEER HOURS REPORT The next Board meeting will be held on June 28, 1990 at 12:00 noon in the multi - purpose room. Elaine Black questioned if there were more staff at Burns Manor now; Ropert answered yes although turnover has continued. Chairman Jim Mills named Kay Peterson as temporary Vice Chair- person. Motion made by Kay Peterson and seconded by Elanie Black to ad- journ the meeting. All in favor. Motion carried. Chairperson Jim Mills adjourned the meeting. R ctfull submitted: ATTEST: Robert Koepc� k, Secretary J im Mills, Chairperson E 0 0 BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME Special Meeting Minutes - June 5, 1990 The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home met Tuesday, June 5, 1990. Chairman James Mills called the meeting to order at 4:30 pm. Members Present: James Mills Kay Peterson Robert Koepcke Roger Gilmer Don Erickson Elaine Black Press: Robin Shoen, Hutchinson Leader Jenny Ingebrigtsen, KDUZ Radio Letters from Design Dimensions and Patch, Erickson, Madson, Watten were reviewed, outlining their recommendations on bidding contractors for facility remodeling. It was noted that portions of the project were not bid upon, but that these will be arranged through Design Dimensions as each portion falls under the $15,000 "floor" required for municipal bids. It was also noted that certain needs outlined by Design Dimensions are not included in the cost estimates, but that these should be financed with some of the excess funds available. Robert Koepcke summarized that $550,000 is currently available for remodeling with proposed bids and estimates being $381,033. Kay Peterson and Elaine Black motioned to approve bids and estimates as recommended, forwarding same to City Council for their approval on June 12. All in favor. Motion carried. Jim Mills discussed the coming bequest from the Zeleny estate, estimated at $60,000. He and Everett Hantge of the Memorial Committee will meet with representatives of the First Congregational Church (the estate _s co- beneficiary) and Zapp Bank (the estate's trustee) to determine the best method to manage the funds until their maturity in June, 1991. Jim also emphasized that these funds are not included with the money available for remodeling; there are no current plans to spend these funds. Robert Koepcke asked for a volunteer to review invoices from accounts payable. Don Erickson agreed to do so. Kay Peterson and Roger Gilmer motioned to adjourn this meeting at 5:02 i , //"7q , ( 3) June Minutes Page 2 pm. All in favor. Motion carried. M ATTEST: James Mills, Chairman Respectfully submitted by, 0 0 E HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AMENDED JOINT MEETING OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CITY COUNCIL - June 7, 1990 Large Conference Room - 7:00 a.m. Present from City Council: Paul Ackland, Mayor; John Mlinar, Alderman; Don Erickson, Alderman; Marlin Torgerson, Alderman; Gary Plotz, City Administrator; Ken Merrill, City Finance Director Prese,it from Hospital: Dori Johnson, President; Diane Gilmer, Secretary; Rev. Thor Skeie, Trustee Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator;'Frank Seivert, Director of Finance; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Robyn Erickson, Director of Marketing; Gib Lehman, Director of Plant Operations; G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney; Bill Fahey, Ehlers & Associates; Alan Nordby, LifeSpan; Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey & Whitney; Peter Worthington, M.A. Mortenson Co.; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording Secretary President Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 a.m. and greeted those present. As part of her opening remarks, she informed the group that Dr. Nissen had been recognized recently in a letter to the editor of the local paper which described his participation in the national award - winning Family Practice Physician Preceptorship Program at the University of Minnesota- Duluth. Graves introduced Peter Worthington, who reviewed the finalized expansion project plans. Base -bid (including Bid Pack I and Bid Pack II) projects being done by outside contractors, and add alternate projects being done in- house, were discussed. He told the group that the Medical Office Building is expected to be done by the end of May, 1991. The Hospital addition will be done two months following that. The Hospital is now in the process of bidding the first bid package, which includes all foundations, structural steel, concrete for roof and external walls. Bid opening for this portion of Bid Pack I is June 19. The second portion of Bid Pack I will be opened on June 26 and includes concrete, masonry, steel and concrete roof work. The remainder of the project is contained in Bid Pack 2 and will be on the streets the first week in July. Bids are to be received by the first week in August so contractors can be hired by the end of August, and the final cost will be determined. The latest cost model was shown. The Hospital is now at the construction document phase, and those documents were received at the end of last week. The last drawings brought the project cost to $83,000 over the maximum. Since then, value engineering has been done and changes have been made to bring the cost to $90,000 below the first estimate. The final cost will be determined when all the contractors have been identified. (The Hospital has asked M.A. Mortenson Co. not to give a GMP now, but to wait until the bid packs are returned. At that time, if the actual GMP goes above the budget, the scope of the project will be reduced.) ��- 64 Joint Meeting of City Council and Hospital Board of Directors - 6/7/90 . Page Two Two unexpected cost group that $200,000 The additional soil and the plans will end of the Hospital Greencastle site. overruns were next discussed. Worthington informed the will be needed for soils correction and site build -up. will correct the site's slope away from the building, )e amended to include a short retaining wall at the east property because the site will be higher than the Fire protection upgrades were also under budgeted. Following a survey by the State Fire Marshal's office, it was determined that additional fire doors, sprinklers, etc. will be needed to bring the entire facility up to current fire codes. In summary, Worthington stated that several changes have been made in the project plans, but nothing will compromise the project. Nothing has been dropped, but value engineering has helped to save some costs. Graves thanked Worthington for his input and then introduced Frznk Seivert, who discussed the financial forecasts. The debt summary was shown, including costs for the Medical Office Building ($3,350,000) and Hospital ($8,725,000), Hospital equipment ($2,7.50,000) and refinancing of existing debt ($1,025,000). Seivert discussed significant assumptions that the model was based upon, including patient days, number of outpatient visits, standard price increase per year, deductions, FTEs and wage increases. He stated that the feasibility statement will be issued when these figures are firm, and Arthur Anderson & Co. will sign off on it then. He discussed forecasted debt coverage, net income, and depreciation figures which showed that $3.6 million should be available to retire the project debt by 1994. Those figures tell the investors that the project is sound. He then presented key business ratios. When compared to Standard and Poor's index, the Hospital's ratios are very favorable. Nordby added that LifeSpan has compared the Hospital's issue to other "A" rated issues, and all HCH ratios compared favorably. Seivert confirmed that Hospital staff feels comfortable that the Hospital will be in a good position to continue our "A" rating and meet the expectations of the debt service in the coming years. Bill Fahey then addressed the group. He distributed a handout containing bond indexes from June, 1989, through June, 1990 and told the group that the Hospital may have lower interest rates by the time the issue is brought to the market on June 17. He compared HCH's issue to bid tabulations (attached to the handout) from recent bond sales for the Cities of Winthrop and New Ulm. Fahey explained that the difference between the interest rate Seivert used in his estimate and the interest Fahey used is due to capitalized interest. Seivert will use the interest earned on construction funds and Hospital current funds to roll over the interest earned and help pay for the cost of the project. Joint Meeting of City Council and Hospital Board of Directors - 6/7/90 Page Three The length of the bond issue was discussed. Bonds to finance the project will be issued as follows: Taxable July, 1990 (approximately $3 millio ) Tax - Exempt July, 1990 (approximately $3 million) Tax - Exempt November, 1990 (recall of 1977 issue and refinance exisiting revenue notes - approximately $1,025,000) Tax - Exempt January, 1991 (balance of tax - exempt debt) Fahey indicated to those present that his recommendation is to proceed with the project. Based on electorate, Mortenson's comments and the report that Arthur Anderson b Company returns, his opinion is positive. Graves thanked Fahey for his report. Graves then announced to the group that an agreement had been reached with the physicians of the Hutchinson Medical Center regarding a lease for the new Medical Office Building. He outlined physician payments over the next five years, based on the number of physicians associated with the Medical Center, which will peak at $336,000 per year in 1994 and remain the same until the lease ends in 21 years. There may be an additional short -fall, and that item has not been resolved as of this date. It may cause the lease to extend at the maximum amount ($336,000) beyond the 21 -year period. Lease increases give the Medical Center incentive to find other physicians. Grading the lease costs make it much more attractive to incoming physicians. Jerry Gilligan, bond counsel for the Hospital, was introduced. Gilligan presented the proposed resolution to the group and asked them to review it, section by section. It was noted that the project site is east (not north) of the current building, and the budget cost stated in the resolution should be changed from $15,655,000 (the maximum allowable) to $15,350,000 (arrived at after the financial forecasts were completed). Gilligan noted that next Tuesday, the LifeSpan board will review the resolution and officially approve the issuance of the bonds. The City Council will call for the sale of the bonds at their meeting on June 11. Johnson then asked for a motion to adopt the resolution. Following discussion: Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Torgerson, to adopt the resolution for the sale of general obligation revenue bonds as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. Anderson then briefly addressed the group, requesting direction regarding which governing body would be awarding contracts and determining details of the project as it goes along. It was decided to discuss at the City Council meeting on June 11. �J Joint Meeting of City Council and Hospital Board of Directors - 6/7/90 Page Four Johnson thanked everyone present for their attendance, and the meeting was adjourned at 8:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Laurie Hulkonen Diane Gilmer Recording Secretary Secretary LH 0 e HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL Inocme Stattsent for Months Ended May 31, 1990 end 1989 MONTHLY ANALYSIS CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO BUDGET CURRENT MOUTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL May 90 %of M. v 90 %Of Increase Percent REVENUE It EXPENSE ................. Actual ..........----....--------......--. Total B,,iget Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE 1,203,608 100.DG% 1,115,029 .............-- 100.00% ................ 88,579 7.94% Pal icy Discounts and Free Care (17,339) -1.GG% (17,711) -1.59% 372 -2.10% Governmental Discounts (210,689) ............ - 17.50% (163,352) - 14.65% (47,337) 28.98% NET OPERATING REVENUE 975,580 ............ ............ 81.05% 933,966 .............. 83.76% 41,614 ....... 4.46% OPERATING EXPENSES: ............ 81.05% ............ 83.64% .............. 14.23% ....... Salaries 479,579 39.85% 442,695 39.77% 36,884 8.33% Benefits 110,629 9.19% 97,733 8.77% 12,896 13.20% Supplies and other expenses 381,292 31.58% 307,244 27.55% 74,048 24.10% Deprec ation 34,833 2.89% 40,245 3.61% (5,412) - 13.45% Interest 11,247 ............ 0.93% 11,503 1.03% (256) -2.23% Total Operating Expense 1,017,580 ............ ............ 84.54% ............ 899,420 ................ 80.66% ..................... 118,160 13.14% OPERATING MARGIN (42,000) - 3.49% 34,546 3.10% (76,546) - 221.58% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 23,592 I.W. 26,309 2.36% (2,717) - 10.33% NET INCOME (USS) ............ (18,408) : :�... :..... ............ - 1.53% 60,855 ..__........ ..................... 5.46% ..................... (79,263) - 130.25% CURRENT MOUTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL may 90 %of May 89 %Of Increase Percent REVENUE i EXPENSE ................. Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE ................................... 1,203,608 100.00% 1,021,117 ............................... 100.00% 182,491 17.87% Policy Discounts and Free Care (17,339) -1.44% (16,928) -1.66% (411) 2.43% Goverrsaental Discounts (210,689) - 17.50% (150,150) - 14.70% (60,539) 40.32% NET OPERATING REVENUE ............ 975,580 ............ 81.05% 854,039 83.64% ..................... 121,541 14.23% OPERATING EXPENSES: ............ ............ ..................... Salaries 479,579 39.85% 422,607 41.39% 56,972 13.48% Benefits 110,629 9.19% 80,594 7.89% 30,035 37.27% Applies and other expenses 381,292 31.68% 304,030 29.77% 77,262 25.41% Depreciation 34,833 2.89% 29,656 2.90% 5,177 17.46% Interest 11,247 0.93% 8,010 0.78% 3,237 40.41% Total Operating Expense ............ 1,017,580 ............ 84.54% 844,897 ..................... 82.74% 172,683 20.44% OPERATING MARGIN ............ (42,000) - -3.49% .---- - - - - -- 9,142 ..................... 0.90% (51,142) - 559.42% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 23,592 1.96% 25,698 2.52% (2,106) -8.20% NET INCOME (LOSS) ----- • - - - --- (18,408) ............ - 1.53% 34,840 ----------------- 3.41% - - -- (53,248) -152.84% HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL Income Statement for Periods Ended May 31, 1990 and 1989 YTD ANALYSIS YTD ACTUAL TO BUDGET YTD ACTUAL TO ACTUAL YTD May 90 %Of YTD May 90 %of Increase Percent REVENUE L EXPENSE ................. Actual ................................... Total Bvs9 et Total (Decrease) variance TOTAL REVENUE 5,864,065 100.00% 5,700,552 ............................... 100.00% 163,513 2.8Z Policy Discounts and Free Care (63,584) -1.08% (62,274) -1.09% (1,310) 2.1C% Governmental Discounts (953,432) ............ - 16.26% (873,868) - 15.33% (79,564) 9.10% NET OPERATING REVENUE 4,847,049 ............ ............ 82.66% 4,764,410 ..................... 83.58% 82,639 1.73% OPERATING EXPENSES: ............ ..................... Salaries 2,294,150 39.12% 2,265,738 39.75% 28,412 1.25% Benefits 561,782 9.58% 508,116 8.91% 53,666 10.56% Supplies and other expenses 1,638,433 27.94% 1,515,568 26.59% 122,865 8.11% Depreciation 173,946 2.97% 201,225 3.53% (27,279) - 13.56% Interest 24,953 ............ 0.43% 57,515 1.01% (32,562) - 56.61% Totat Operating Expense 4,693,264 ............ 80.03% 4,548,162 ..................... 79.78% 145,102 3.19% OPERATING MARGIN ............ 153,785 ............ 2.62% 216,248 ..................... 3.7r% (62,463) - 28.88% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 95,292 ............ 1.63% 131,604 2.31% (36,312) -27.59% MET INCOME (LOSS) 249,077 --- 347,852 6.10% (98,775) - 28.40% .......... ............ .... ....... .. .... .. :. YTD ACTUAL TO ACTUAL 9 r _J YTD MAy 90 %of YTD May 89 %Of Increase Percent REVENUE i EXPENSE ................. Actual Total Actuat Total (Decrease) Variance TOTAL REVENUE ................................... 5,864,065 100.00% 5,024,962 ............................... 100.00% 939,103 16.70% Policy Diacotnts and Free Care (63,584) -1.08% (83,996) -1.67% 20,412 - 24.30% Govertsamtal Disco is (953,432) ............ - 16.26% (595,818) - 11.86% (357,614) 60.02% MET OPERATING REVENUE 4,847,049 ............ ............ 82.66% 4,345,148 ..................... 86.47% 501,901 11.55% OPERATING EXPENSES: ............ ..................." Salaries 2,294,150 39.12% 1,993,484 39.67% 300,666 15.08% Benefits 561,782 9.58% 387,862 7.72% 173,920 44.84% Supplies and other expenses 1,638,433 27.94% 1,353,101 26.93% 285,332 21.09% Depreciation 173,946 2.97% 143,204 2.85% 30,742 21.47% Interest 24,953 ............ 0.43% 13,502 0.27% 11,451 84.81% Total Operating Expense 4,693,264 ............ 80.03% 3,891,153 ..................... 77.44% 602,111 20.61% OPERATING MARGIN ............ 153,785 .._____ 2.6Z% - - - -. 453,995 --------- 9.03% - ----- (300,210) - --- -- - 66.13% TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 95,292 ............ 1.63% 122,217 2.43% (26,925) - 22.03% MET INCOME (LOSS) 249,077 ---------- 4.25% .- 576,212 ..................... 11.47% (327,135) -56.T% 9 r _J EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1989 AFFIDAVIT Za - C 2 - AM OVER E5 YEARS OF AGE, OR I AM ON DISABILITY A� BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, AND f INCO`E PER YEAR IS LESS TH[,."- EL"!ILY SIZ IrJCOIE co $7, 560 2 $9,180 THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $11, 05 FOR TRASH APLD REFUSE SERVICE !; "OULD IMPOSE A FINP,NCTAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION OF THE CHARGE TO $1,50, S I GNATUH (j. STREET ADDRESS / +� 7f FOR OFFICE USE ONLY To: WATER DEPARTMENT DATE DATA CHANGE ACCOUNT NUMBER To: CITY COUNCIL DATE COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DISAPPROVED /QG —; PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12TH, 1990 . PUBLICATION NO. 4132 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 260 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 90 -03 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 11th, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on the 26th day of June, 1990, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the improvement of Delaware Street by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1990. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1990. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $36,195.00. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or Presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. RESOLUTION NO. 4132 PAGE 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. - z t Qsk Gary D. Plbtz, Cit'SbAdministrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota - J tt ,i °9: �w jiEjCEIVF� REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES ON DELAWARE STREET We, as Delaware Street property owners, unanimously are against the proposed construction of sanitary sewer on Delaware Street. The following is just a few of the many reasons for our stand against this issue: 1. Presently, we all have working systems and foresee no problems with these systems. 2. We feel the consideration of this project has not been taken in behalf of.all Delaware Street property owners, but because of the Noplos home which is in need of improvement before it is saleable property. 3. We feel we should not be financially responsible in any - way for the state of the Noplos property, its improve- ment for easy selling or required to help take the fin- ancial burden off the mortgage holder(s). We consider the Noplos property a business matter which should con- cern only the mortgage holder(s) and not involve neighbor property owners. 4. This assessment in not affordable. -One household consists of a husband and wife both over SO years of age. -A second household consists of 5 persons: a husband and wife (both full -time college students) supporting 3 children (ages 7, 9, 11) on part -time jobs and student loan money. -The third household has been charged a double assess - ment, half of which is for a lot which at the present time cannot be built on due to city zoning regulations. This assessment compares to second mortgages on our homes for something we do not need. 5. We are not guaranteed that this sewer project will in- crease our property values. S _ 6. The monthly user fee is another unjustifiable cost on something we do not need and cannot afford. S _ r1 L Ethicality and fairness to all parties involved should take precedence in this and any other decision making matter. We trust our Council members to provide us with such a hearing. If there are any questions which need attending to prior to the city council meeting on Tuesday, June 26, please feel free to contact us: Floyd and Olga Howard 587 -2278 Lloyd and Kathy Hemmah 587 -4222 Brad and LeAnn Olson 587 -3844 Thank you for your time, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 260 LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT NO. 90 -03 LINE COST PER LOT: 6 7,239.00 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOTBERG CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER A APPURTENANCES NUMBER YEARS SPREAD: 10 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODLOERG DELAWARE STREET UNIT USED: PER LOT CHECKED BY: CAL RICE PAGE 1 OF 1 ACCT. CITY PLO NUMBER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE LINE COST SERVICE TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER MANE 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. AREA S.F. PER LOT LEAD CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 02- 116-30 -01 -0010. Lloyd 6 Kathleen Newnan 1110 Delaware St. 23-330-0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Riverside Addition 1 1 6 7,239.00 02 02- 116 -30 -01 -0020 Leann K. Thomas -Olson 1312 Delaware St. 23- 0330-0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Riverside Addition 2 1 S 7,239.00 03 02 -116- 30-01 -0030 Lloyd 6 Kathleen Neenah 1310 Delaware St. 23-330 -ODSO Hutchinson, MN 55350 Riverside Addition 3 1 S 7,239.00 04 02- 116 -30- 01-0040 Floyd a Olga Howard 1116 Delaware St. 23-330 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Riverside Addition 4 1 6 7,239.00 05 02-116 -30 -02 -0020 Horwest Financial 14N 1250 W. Co. Rd. 42 23 -068 -0130 Burnsville, Hill 55350 Riverside Addition 5 I 6 1,239.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 260 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 6 36.19S.00 I�� RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION N0. 9279 • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 260 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 90 -03 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement of Delaware Street by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer and Appurtenances; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: I. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 1st, 1990, until the 31st day of December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment., to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1990; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 1Sth, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. a. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shell be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. ayor 0 City Administrator RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 810 AND AWARDING CONTRACT RESOLUTION NO. 9280 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NO. 90 -03 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of sanitary sewer and appurtenances on Delaware Street; bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Amount Bid Juul Contracting Company, Inc. $ 40,347.90 Juul Contracting Company, Inc.-Alternate f 36,499.25 Redstone Construction Co., Inc. f 54,035.50 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Juul Contracting Company, Inc. of Hutchinson, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Juul Contracting Company, Inc. of Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, in the alternate bid amount of $36,499.25, for the improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering. • 2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of June, 1990. City Administrator Mayor A "UBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12TH, 1990 • PUBLICATION NO. 4129 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14 & 90 -18 Hutchinson, Minnesota May 22nd, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.M. on the 26th day of June, 1990, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed assessment for the improvement of : Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Avenue to South Termini by Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Pauls Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and • Garden Road by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Island Drive in the 5th Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.W. to Railroad Tracks by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1990. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1990. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $367,949.92 Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, , 3, PJBLICATION NO. 4129 PAGE 2 written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. Gary D. P o , CityVdministrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota (612) 587 -5151 C CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 ASSESSMENT HEARING 1990 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Letting No.5 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 June 26, 1990 - 8:00 pm • Project Description 90 -05 Carlisle Street (from 6th Av NE to south) 90 -06 Florida & Illinois Streets 90 -07 Hilltop Dr, Pauls Rd, Lindy Ln, Mark Dr, Garden Rd 90 -13 McClure's 2nd Addition (Campbell Court) 90 -14 Lakewood Terrace 5th Add. (McDonald & Park Is. Dr.) 90 -18 Lind Street (from 3rd Av NW to RR) Total Construction Cost Project Expenses TOTAL PROJECT COST $387,257.20 $ 73,697.86 $460,955.06 PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN Project Project Cost Assessed Cost City Cost 90 -05 $ 41,488.16 $ 38,830.10 $ 2,658.06 90 -06 $ 65,806.17 $ 60,652.26 $ 5,153.91 90 -07 $282,317.03 $216,359.92 $ 65,957.11 90 -13 $ 17,468.73 $ 17,468.73 $ 0.00 90 -14 $ 35,630.96 $ 35,630.96 $ 0.00 90 -18 $ 15,793.80 $ 2,437.50 $ 13,356.30 Signs $ 2,450.21 $ 0.00 $ 2,450.21 Total $460,955.06 $371,379.47 $ 89,575.59 PAYMENT OPTIONS Full Payment without Interest by October 1, 1990 Full Payment with Interest through 1991 after October 1, 1990 • Assessment on Tax Roll, 10 Years With Interest, Equal Principal Deferment for Property Owners over 65 Years Old a A SMt NT ROLL N0, 259 LETTING 90. S. PROJECT N0. 90 -OS STREET WORK COST PIR FRONT FOOT f 32.42 ED 8Y: JOHN P. ROOE8ER6 CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING,; GRAVEL BASE, CURB b G SURFACING,' S' DRIVEWAY COST PLR SQUARE YARD s 23.80 1 ED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG AND APPURTENANCES ON CARLISLE ST. FROM GIN AVE, UTM TERMINI NUMBER OF YEARS 555 Carlisle St. SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE (ASSESS COST IN MILLER'S IST ADDITION BY FRONT FOOT) PAGE 'I OF 16 23 -086 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's Tat Addition 6 2 66 ACCT. CITY Pill NUMBER LOT BLOCK STREET DRIVEWAY 31-117 -29-09 -0980 s TOTAL N0, COUNTY Pill NUMBER NAME B ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. FRONTAGE SQ. YO. CITED Ir S ASSESSMENT • �r �7 y # N ti P 01 31- 117 -29- 09-0970 Timothy Puchalski 6 Deanna Plath $: 555 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's Tat Addition 6 2 66 14.7 ': f 2,489.58 02 31-117 -29-09 -0980 Laurel Vasko 565 Carlisle St. 23- 086-0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 7 2 66 14.7 f 2,489.58 03 31- 117 -29- 09-0990 Mark 6 Michelle JaskoWak 575 Carlisle St. 23- 086-0130 Hutchinson, MN S5350 Miller's tat Addition 8 2 66 16.8 's 2.539.56 04 31- 117 -29- 09-1000 Charles 6 Harriet Burtch 583 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0140 Hutchinson, MH 55350 Miller's ist Addition 9 2 66 15.7 k 2.513.38 OS 31- 117 -29 -09 -1010 Sylvia Mielke 593 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's tat Addition 10 2 66 0 $ 2,139.72 06 31- 117 -29 -10 -0630 Marlin 6 Ada Schauer 594 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0160 Hutchinson. HN 55360. - Miller's 1st Addition 1 3 66 0 f 2,139.72 07 31- 117-29 -10 -0840 Scott B Debra Haspala 584 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0170 Hutchinson, MN 55350 .Miller's Ist Addition 2 3 66 21.1 S 2,641.90 08 31- 117 -29 -10 -0850 Steven IT Debra FitAloff 574 Carlisle St. 23- 086 -0160 Hutchinson. MN S5350 Miller's tat Addition 3 3 66 14.7 f 2,489.58 09 31- 117 -29 -10 -0860 Robert 6 Carolyn Lambert $64 Carlisle St. 23 - 0190 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Miller's Tat Addition 4 3 66 14.7 S 2,489.S8 • �r �7 y # N ti P ,t • �r �7 c E . s ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -05 - STREET WORK COST PER FRONT ` a 32.42 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB B GUTTER, SURFACING, 5' DRIVEWAY COST PER SOUARE Y4RIT 5 23.80 .COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG AND APPURTENANCES ON CARLISLE ST. FROM 6TH AVE. TO SOUTH TERMINI NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE (ASSESS COST IN MILLER'S 1ST ADDITION BY FRONT FOOT( PAGE 2 OF 16 ACCT, CITY PIO NUMBER LOT BLOCK STREET DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 8 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. FRONTAGE SD. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 10 31- 117-29 -10 -0870 Janes 8 Marlene Nielsen 554 Carlisle St. 23 -086 -0200 Hutchinson, NN 55350 Miller's 1st Addition 5 3 66 14.7 $ 2,489.58 SUB -TOTAL 7 24,422.18 k " A • is '• 0 • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -05 STREET WORK COST PER PARCEL S 3,114.08 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, SURFACING, 5' DRIVEWAY COST PER SQUARE YARD. S 23.80 COMPUTED BY: JON P. RODEBERG AND APPURTENANCES ON CARLISLE ST. FROM BIN AVE. TO SOUTH TERMINI NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD IO CHECKED BY: CAL RICE (ASSESS 114 OF CUL DE SAC COST TO EACH LOT) PAGE 3 OF 16 ACCT. CITY P10 NUMBER LOT BLOCK STREET DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PIG NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION 40. NO. COST SO. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 11 31 -117- 29-10-0112 Michael E Lynn Schuetze 544 Carlisle St. M75' of Lot 8, 23- 056 -0490 Hutchinson, AN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 1 26.6 $ 3,747.16 12 31- 117 -29- 10-0113 Burnell B Tummy Sell 540 Carlisle St. S75' of NI50' of Lot B EM W12' 23- 056 -0495 Hutchinson. MN 55350 of S41'. Blk. 4. N 112 City 4 1 28.8 f 1,199.52 13 31- 117 - 29-10-0151 Mark A Luann Linder 541 Carlisle St. S75' of N150' of Lot 9, 23-056 -0540 Hutchinson. MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 1 26.6 1 3.747.16 14 31- 117 -29 -10 -0152 Deane B Maxine D1et01 845 -tad Are. S.E. x75' of Lot 9, 23- 056 -OSSO Hutchinson. MN 55350 N 1/2 City 4 1 0 S 3,114.08 SUB -TOTAL s 14,407.92 TOTAL ASSESSED PROJECT N0. 9045 1 10.830:10 a ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90-06 STREET WORK COST PER FRONT FOOT S 40.58 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, STORM SEVER, 5' DRIVEWAY COST PER SQUARE YARD k 23.80 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBER6. SURFACING b APPORT. ON FLORIDA ST. 8 ILLINOIS ST. FROM T.N. T TO NO. TERMINI NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE ILLINOIS STREET PAGE_ 4 OF 16 ACCT. CITY Pill NUMBER LOT BLOCK STREET DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER MARE 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FRONTAGE SO. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 15 35 - 10-16-0240. Alois 6 Helen Barnes 110 Illinois St. Part of Lot 4, 23 -035 -0500 Hutchinson, NN $5150 Sec. 35- 117 -30 (IN 22 0.44 AC) 137.94 37.7 $ 6,494.87 16 15- 117 -30 -16 -0250 Randy 6 Kimberly Arndt 155 Illinois St. Part of Lot 4, 23- 035 -0300 Hutchinson, MN 55150 Sec. 35-117 -30 ITN 22 0.44 AC) 150 41.1 S 7,065.18 17 35- 117 -30 -16 -0260 Elaine Schermann 1485 Hwy. 7 West 21-328 -0010 Hutchinson, HM 55350 Jacobson's Lakeview Subd. 1 100 25.5 S 4664.90 19 35- 117-30-16-0270 John 6 Jeanne Reynolds 140 Illinois St. 23 -128 -0020 Hutchinson, HM 55350 Jacobson's Lakeview Subd. 2 100 13 S 4,843.40 19 35- 117-30-16-0280 Timothy 6 Diane Madden 160 Illinois St. 23 -328 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55150 Jacobson'$ Lakeview Subd. 3 6 4 130 31.1 1 6,015.58 SUB -TOTAL (29,087.91 1 • 1 7 1 �I ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -06 STREET WORK COST PER LOT t 5.627.76 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, STORM SEWER, 5• DRIVEWAY COST PER SQUARE YARD f 23.80 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG SURFACING B APPORT. ON FLORIDA ST. 8 ILLINOIS ST. FROM T.H. 7 TO NO. TERMINI NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE FLORIDA STREET PAGE S OF 16 ACCT. NO. CITY PID NUMBER COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION NO. NO. UNIT LOTS DRIVEWAY SQ. YD. TOTAL CREDITS ASSESSMENT 20 35- 117 -30 -16 -0200 Jeffrey 6 Sandra Mansell Excelsior Halves West I3SS Hay. 7 West 430' • 150' of Lot 4, 23 -035 -0600 Hutchinson, HN 55350 Sec. 35- 117 -30 2 28.8 F 11,940.94 21 35 -117- 30-16 -0210 Richard 6 P. Danielson. 145 Florida St. 110' A 130' of Lot 4, 23- 035-0900 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Sec. 35- 117 -30 - 1 33.3 f 6,420.29 22 35 -117 -30-16 -0220 Arthur 6 Alice Lenzen 717 Nest 2nd St. Sunset Ridge 175' . 130' of Lot 4, 23 -035 -0700 Neconia, MN 55387 Sec. 35-117 -30 1 66.5 f 7,210.45 23 35 -117 -30-16 -0230 Robert 6 Gina Lenz X222.45' of 5620' of W150' of 168 Florida St. E950' of Lot 4 6 5397.55' of 23- 035 -0300 Hutchinson, MI 55350 W20' of E820', Sec. 35- 117 -30 1 15.5 S 51996.65 SUB -TOTAL F 31,568.33 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -06 'f 60.652.26 RSSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. S. PROJECT NO. 90 -07 CAG A BIT. COST PER FRONT FOOT 5 35.67 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. PRDERERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB A GUTTER, SURFACING A APPURT. BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT $ 26.15 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE. PAULS ROAD, LINOY LANE, MARK DRIVE AND GARDEN ROAD 5 OR 8 DRIVEWAY COST15OUARE YARD 23.80 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE 24 NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 150' .250' of Lot 10, Aud'. PAGE 6 OF 16 ACCT. CITY PIO NUMBER LOT BLOCK C66 6 BIT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PIO NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FR. FT. FT. FT. S0, Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 24 32- 117 - 29-14-0110 gene C. Betkar 150' .250' of Lot 10, Aud'. 120 Pauls Road Plat Lot 10, Aud. Plat W 112 8 23-248 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Sec. 32- 117-29 250 20 $ 9,393.50 25 32- 117-29 -14 -0120 Harold Thompson c/o 7 -Hi Hotel Tract 200' . 400' of Lot 10 A 700 Hwy. 7 East 11, Aud. Plat Lot 14, Aud. 23 -248- 0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Plat W 1/2 Sec. 32-117 -29 200 0 S 7,134.00 26 32 -117- 2944 -0130 Denny Hanson Sheep Shedde of Hutchinson Part of Lot 11, Aud. Plat Lot 320 E. Oak Ave. 14, Aud. Plat W 1/2 Sec. 8 23- 248 -0120 Olivia, NN 56277 32- 117 -29 175 28.8 S 6,927.69 27 32 -117- 29-14 -0140 Arthur Saar, Jr. Part of Lot 11, Aud. Plat Lot 45 -5th Ave. N.W. 14, Aud. Plat V 112 Sec. 8 _ 23- 248-0130 Hutchinson, NN 55350 32- 117-29 150 28.8 5 6,035.94 28 32- 117- 29 -0150 Wesley A Beverly Wiedenroth 680 Lindy Lane 23- 252 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 1 75 25.6 A 3,284.53 29 32-117 - 29-14 -0160 Charles 6 Elizabeth Jones III Paul& Road Lot 2 6 x15' of Lot 3, 23- 252 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 90 23.3 $ 3,764.84 30 32 -117 -29-14 -0170 Robert 6 Mary Hanover 109 Paul& Road Lot 3 EX HIS' B Lot 4 EX 535', 23- 252 -0030 Hutchinson, NN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 100 22.2 S 4,095.36 31 32-117- 29-14 -0190 Florence Albrecht 107 Paul$ Road S35' of Lot 4 A N65' of Lot S. 23- 252 -0040 Hutchinson, NN 55350 Clifton Heights I 100 22.2 B 4,095.36 0 r r AIMIENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -07 C&G 6 BIT. COST PER FRONT FOOT f 35.67 BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, NG ADEN 6 APPURT. BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT S 26.15 C BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE, PAUL$ ROAD, LINDY LANE, MARK DRIVE ROAD 5 OR 0" DRIVEWAY COSTISQUARE YARD 23.00 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 PAGE 7 OF 16 ACCT. CITY PIO NUMBER LOT BLOCK CAG G BIT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY P10 NUMBER NAME B ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FR. FT. FT. FT. SO. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 32 32- 117 -29 -14 -0200 Thomas Carrigan 105 Pauls Road SIO' of Lot 5 A All Lot 6, 23- 252 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 85 27.7 S 3.691.21 33 32- 117 -29 -10 -0210 Willis S Hazel Wolff 112 Mark Or. N15' of Lot 11 6 All Lot 12. 23- 252 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 90 22 f 3,733.90 34 32- 111 -0220 David G Marie May 110 Mark Dr. N25' Lot 10 6 S60' Lot 11, 23- 252 - 0100 Hutchinson, RN 55350 Clifton "eights 1 as 10.5 S 3.281.85 35 32- 117 -29 -14 -0230 Ralph B Edella Schuetz 108 Mark Or. N75' Lot 9 a S50' Lot 10, 23- 252 -0080 Hutchinson, HN 55350 Clifton Heights I 85 20 S 3.507.95 36 32-117 -14 -0240 Randy 6 Linda Madsen 106 Mark Dr. S 40' of Lot 9, 23- 252-0090 Hutchinson, RN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 40 19 $ 1.879.00 37 32- 117 -29 -14 -0250 Randy 6 Linda Madsen 106 Hark Dr. HBO' of Lot A. 23- 252 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 50 0 S 1,783.50 38 32- 117 -29- 14-0260 Glenn 6 Claire Woelfel 104 Mark Dr. Lot 7 6 $25' of Lot 8, 23- 252 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 1 100 22.2 S 1,095.36 39 32- 117 -29-14 -0270 Janes Endres 660 Hilltop Dr. Lot 1 6 WIS' of Lot 2, 23- 252 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 2 90 23.3 B 3,764.84 40 32 -117- 29-14 -0290 Willi me B J.E. Breitkreute 664 Hilltop Dr. E60' Lot 2 B W30' Lot 3, 23- 252 -0130 Hutchinson, MN 65350 Clifton Heights 2 90 23.3 $ 3.764.84 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -07 CAG 6 BIT. COST PER FRONT FOOT f 35.67 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, SURFACING 6 APPURT. BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT { 26.15 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE. PAUL$ ROAD, LINOY LANE, MARK DRIVE AND GARDEN ROAD 5 OR 8' DRIVEWAY COST /SQUARE YARD 23.00 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE NUMBER Of YEARS SPREAD 10 PAGE 8 OF 16 ' ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER LOT BLOCK CAG A BIT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FR. FT. FT. FT. SO, YD. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 41 32- 117 -29 -14 -0300 Ronald A Peggy Weispenning 668 Hilltop Dr. E45' Lot 3 6 W40' Lot 4. 23- 252 -0140 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 2 85 27.7 k 3,691.21 42 32 -117- 29-14 -0310 John 6 Rita Forbes 115 Garden Road E35' Lot 4 a W55' Lot 5, 23- 252 -0150 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 2 90 24.4 $ 3,791.02 43 32- 117 -29 -14 -0320 Jahn 6 Carol Mlinar 704 Hilltop Or. E20' Lot 5 A W65' Lot 6, 23- 252 -0160 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Neights 2 85 18.8 { 3,479,39 44 32- 117 -29-14 -0330 Thomas Shafer 108 Hilltop Or. ETD' Lot 6 6 All Lot 1, 23 -252 -0170 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 2 85 21.1 $ 3,534.13 45 32- 117 -29- 14-0340 James Schlagel 656 Juul Read 23- 252 -0180 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 8 2 87 36 S 3,960.09 46 32 -117 -2944 -0360 Rman 6 Aneila Hass 113 Mark Dr. 23- 252 -0200 Hutchinson, MN 55350 .Clifton Heights 1 3 100 1.7 S 1,750.26 47 32 -117 -29-14 -0370 Mark 6 Julie Husks 111 Mark Dr. 21- 252 -0210 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 2 3 90 10.8 S 3,467.34 48 32 -117 -29-14 -0380 Henry 6 L. Horstmann _ 109 lark Dr. 23 -252 -0220 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 3 3 90 14.6 t 3,557.78 49 32 -117 -2944 -0390 Jay A Charleen Hamilton 107 Mark Dr. 23- 252 -0230 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 4 3 as 21.6 1 3,546.03 , ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. S. PROJECT NO. 90-07 EO BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION Of GRACING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, �C ING A APPURT. ' W E • EO BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE, PAULS ROAD, LINDY LAME, MARK DRIVE AROEN ROAD • CH BY: CAL RICE ------------------------- _---------- _------ _------------------------------------------------------- ACCT. CITY PIO NUMBER LOT BLOCK CBS 6 BIT. NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0, FR. FT. CAG 6 BIT. COST PER FRONT FOOT BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT 5' OR e• DRIVEWAY COST /SQUARE YARD NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD PAGE 9 OF 16 ____ --- ____ _- _---------------------------- BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY FR. FT. SO• YU. CREDITS S 35.67 S 26.15 f 23.80 10 TOTAL ASSESSMENT 50 32- 117 -29 -14 -0400 George A Edna Kahle 105 Mark Dr. 21-252-0240 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 5 3 85 23.3 $ 3,586.49 51 32- 117-29-14 -0410 Lee Stritesky 709 Hilltop Dr. 23- 252 -0250 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 6 3 75 25.6 $ 3,284.53 52 32-117-29- 14-0420 Eugene A Jeanette Ebnet , 106 Garden Road 23 -252 -0260 Hutchinson, tit 55350 Clifton Heights 7 3 75 15.5 S 3,044.15 53 32- 117 - 29-14 -0430 Richard 6 Catherine Holt 108 Garden Road 23- 252 -0270 Hutchinson, RN 55350 Clifton Heights 8 3 75 8.3 1 2,872.79 54 32- 117 -29 -14 -0440 Martin Plaude 110 Garden Road 23-252 -0280 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 9 3 75 12.4 S 2,970.37 55 32-117-29 -14 -0450 HartWill A Eleanor Lack 112 Garden Road 23- 252 -0290 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Clifton Heights 10 3 75 12.4 S 2,970.37 56 32- 117 - 0460 Duane A Barb Pischke 114 Garden Road 23 -252 -0300 Hutchinson, MN 55350 .Clifton Heights 11 3 75 8.8 S 2,884.69 57 32-117 -29 -14 -0470 Sane 6 Barbara Becker ('503` Total Frontate Pauls Road) 120 Pauls Road (1 /7)e 23-251-0010 Hutchinson, MM 55350 SantelMan's 2nd Addition 1 1 71.86 22.2 f .3,091.51 58 32- 117-29 -14 -0480 Daniel A Shan Dural ' 114 Pools Road N 112 of Lot 2, (112 of 317) 23- 251-0025 Hutchinson, MN 56360 SantelNan's 2nd Addition 1 107.79 24.4 S 4,425.59 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. S. PROJECT NO. 90 -07 CAG 6 811. COST PER FRONT FOOT { 35.67 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROUE BERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, SURFACING A APPURT. BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT 3 26.15 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE, PAULS ROAD, LINDY LANE, MARK DRIVE AND GARDEN ROAD 5' OR 8 DRIVEWAY COST /SQUARE YARD 3 23.80 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 _______--------------------------------- PAGE 10 OF 16 --------------------- ACCT. CITY P10 NUMBER _ ----------------------------------------- __ ------- ___ ----- LOT BLOCK CAB A BIT. BITUMINOUS ___ _________ _--------------------- DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PIT) NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OMER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FR. FT. FR. FT. SO•. YO. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 59 32- 117 -29 -14 -0481 Gene A Barbara Betker 120 Pools Road S 112 of Lot 2, (1/2 of 317) 23 -251 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Saatelman's 2nd Addition 1 107.79 28.8 $ 4,530.31 60 32- 117 -29 -14-0490 Kenneth E. Santelman 106 Pauli Road 0") 23 -251 -0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Santelman's 2nd Addition 3 1 215.57 15.5 3 8,058.28 61 32- 117 -29- 15-0010 Dennis A Diane Daniels Rt. 3, Box 243C 755' x 400' SW I/4 SE 1/4 (Has a short side of 150') 8' 23 -032 -0300 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Sec. 32- 117 -29 325 28.8 S 12,278.19 62 32- 117 -29 -15 -0080 Bertha Nackedanz 127 Garden Road Lot 1 EX S46', 23 -402 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Kimberly's Country Estates I 46 0 $ 1,202.90 63 32 -29 -15 -0081 Elsie Sunderland 125 Gorden Road S46' of Lot 1, 23- 402 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Kimberly's Country Estates 1 46 0 $ 1,202.90 64 32- 117 -29 -15 -0090 Loren Lickfelt 6 Grove St. N66' of Lot 2, 23 - 402 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Kimberly's Country Estates 1 66 0 $ 1,725.90 65 32 - 29 -15 -0091 Mary Owinnel 808 Cardinal Or. Lot 2 EX N66', 23- 402 -0030 Owatonna, MN SS060 Kimberly's Country Estates 1 0.75 0 $ 1,248.66 66 32 -111- 29-15-0050 Jahn 6 Rita Forbes Rt. 3, Box 547 Tract 100' x 150' In SW 1/4 23-032 -0800 Hutchinson, MN 55350 SE 1/4 Sec. 32- 117 -29 100 21.1 3 4,069.18 67 32 - 117- 29-15-0060 Patrick A Connie Kalenber9 105 Garden Rd. 125' x 155' SW 114 SE 1/4 23 -032 -0900 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Sac. 32- 117 -29 125 19 t 4,910.95 is • : i 1 it f •1� ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER 68 32- 117 -29 -15 -0070 Michael 0. Schmidt 45 Darden Road 23- 032 -0700 Hutchinson, MN 55350 SUBTOTAL PAGE 11 OF 16 ----------------------------- " ------------------ _____ --- ---- ------------------------------- LOT BLOCK CAB 6 BIT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. FR. FT. FR. FT. SQ. YO. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 250' s 126.27' in SR Con W 314 of S 112 SE 1/4 EX RR Sec. 32- 117 -29 126.27 15.5 5 4,872.95 $180.241.73 '.lv 1.4, s �• i ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. S. PROJECT NO. 90 -07 CAG 6 SIT. COST PER FRONT FOOT $ 35.67 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURS 6 GUTTER. SURFACING 6 APPURT. BIT. ONLY COST PER FRONT FOOT $ 26.iS COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE, PAUL$ ROAD, LINDY LAME, MARK DRIVE AND GARDEN ROAD 5' OR 8' DRIVEWAY COST /SQUARE YARD $ 23.80 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 ACCT. CITY PID NUMBER NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER 68 32- 117 -29 -15 -0070 Michael 0. Schmidt 45 Darden Road 23- 032 -0700 Hutchinson, MN 55350 SUBTOTAL PAGE 11 OF 16 ----------------------------- " ------------------ _____ --- ---- ------------------------------- LOT BLOCK CAB 6 BIT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. FR. FT. FR. FT. SQ. YO. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 250' s 126.27' in SR Con W 314 of S 112 SE 1/4 EX RR Sec. 32- 117 -29 126.27 15.5 5 4,872.95 $180.241.73 '.lv 1.4, s s ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. S. PROJECT NO. 90 -07 STREET COST PER FRONT FOOT S 23.177 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB A GUTTER, SURFACING 6 APPURT. NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG HILLTOP DRIVE, PAULS ROAD, LINDY LANE. MARK DRIVE AND GARDEN ROAD CHECKED BY: CAL RICE (HILLTOP DRIVE IM SANTELMAN'S AND SANTELMAN'S 2ND ADDITION) PAGE 12 OF 16 _____________________________________________________________________________________ AC[7. CITY PIO NUMBER ___________ ____________________ LOT BLOCK STREET BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY TOTAL 00. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME 6 ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. FRONTAGE FR. FT. SQ. YD, CREDITS ASSESSMENT 69 32- 117 -29 -11 -0070 Gene B Barbara Better 120 Penis Road (1/7 OF 130.08) 23- 251-0010 Hutchinson, His 55350 Santelman's 2nd Addition 1 1 18.581009 E 436.30 70 32- 117 -29 -14-0180 Daniel 6 Shawn Duval 11.1 Paul, Road N 772 of Lot 2, (112 Of 3/7 OF 130.08) 23-251-0025 Hutchinson, HN 55350 Santelman's 2nd Addition 1 27.876101 A 651.15 71 32- 117-29-14 -0181 Gene A Barbara Better 120 Pauls Road S 1/2 of Lot 2, (1/2 OF 3/1 OF 130.08) 23-251 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Santelman'e 2nd Addition 1 27.876101 A 651.15 72 32- 117 -29 -11 -0190 Kenneth E. Santelman 106 Pauls Road (3/7 OF 130.08) 23- 251 -0030 Hutchinson, 14N 55350 Santeleun's Addition 3 1 55.752938 A 1,308.91 73 32- 117 -29 -11 -0071 Kenneth E. Santelman 106 Paul$ Road 23- 250 -0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Santelman's Addition 1 1 770.8 $ 18,096.07 DBPERM N 32- 117 -29 -11 -0083 Kenneth E. Santelman 106 Pauls Road 23- 250-0010 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Santelman's Add. 1 2 637.56 S 11,968.00 D6P6YY® SUB - TOTAL' A 36,118.18 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -07 $216.359.92 er! s N , 1 ESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LFTTING NO. 5, PRUJF11 N0. 9 COST PER UNIT f 1,940.97 ' ILF0 8Y; JON P. ROOEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF CURB A GUTTER, B1IUMINOU A APPURTENANCES 11417 USED = 0.00 • MPIIfEO BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG CAMPBELL COURT IN MCCLURE'S 2NO 40 1014 HUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE PAGE 13 OF 16 ------------------- ACCT. __ --------------- CITY PID NUMBER _________,.-_-------------------------------- --------------- LOT ...... --------------------- BLOCK - - - -__ __-- ___--- _--- ____------- PER TOTAL NO. COUNTY P10 NUMBER NAME A ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. LOT CREDITS ASSESSMENT — is - 35-117-30-09-0011 Ban A Laura Prochnow 928 Hayden Ave. 23- 265-0010 Hutchinson, MR 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 1 1 1 $ 1,940.97 76 35- I17-30 -09 -0012 Steven A Louise Nelson 702 Shady Ridge Road 23- 265 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's Znd Addition 2 1 1 S 1,940.97 77 35- 117-30- 09 -OD13 David A Karen Westlund 324 School Road 23- 265-0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 3 1 1 $ 1,940.97 78 35-117 -30 -09 -0014 Bradley A Jeri Lueneburg 405 Fischer Ave. 23- 265 -0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 4 1 1 $ 1,940.97 '.. 79 35- 11740 -09 -0015 Rex A Sue Fuller c/o Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 West Highland Park Or. 1 23- 265 -0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 5 1 l $ 1,940.97 80 35 -117- 30-09 -0016 Rex A Sue Fuller c/o Hutchinson Technology, Inc. 40 West Highland Park Or. 23- 265 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure -, 2nd Addition 6 1 1 3 1,940.97 81 35-117 -30 -09 -0017 Helen McClure 516 Shady Ridge Road I 23 265 -0070 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 7 1 1 S 1,940,97 ( I 82 35 -117- 30-09 -0018 Helen McClure 516 Shady Ridge Road 23- 265-0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 8 I 1 f 1,940.97 83 35-117 -30 -09 -0019 Ronald A Lori Pagel 1341 Campbell Lane 23- 265 -0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 McClure's 2nd Addition 9 1 1 f 1,940.97 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90.13 t 17,468.73 1 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LFT TNG NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -14 CAG A BIT. COST PEP LOT $ 2,859.37 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF CURB A GUTTER, BITUMINOUS SURFACING A APPURTENANCES FORT. DRIVEWAY COST PER SQUARE YD. $ 23.80 COMPUTED BY: JDHN P. RODEBERG MCDONALD DRIVE 6 PARK ISLAND DRIVE IN 5TH ADDITION TO LAKEWOOD TERRACE NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE PAGE 14 OF 16 --------------- ACCT. __ -------------------------------- CITY P10 NUMBER ______----------------------------- _--------------- LOT BLOCK _ _------------------------------------------------------- STREET DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME & ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. PER LOT SO. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 84 02- 116 - 30-10 -0150 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Bon 580 23 -383 -0010 Hutchinson, HN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 1 1 1 26.6 $ 3,492.45 85 02- 116 -30-10 -0160 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Box 580 23 -383 -0020 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Stn Add. to Lakewood Terrace 2 1 1 0 $ 2,859.37 86 02- 116 - 30-10 -0110 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Hon 580 23 -383 - 0030 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 1 2 1 0 $ 2,859.37 87 02- 116-30 -10 -0180 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Or., Box 580 23- 383-0040 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 2 2 1 0 $ 2,859.31 88 02- 116 - 30-10 -0190 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Or., Box 580 23- 383-0050 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 3 2 l 0 $ 2,859.37 89 02- 116-30- 10-0200 Bernard 6 Mary Mc Ralth 600 Tyler St. 23-383 -0060 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 4 2 1 0 y 2,859.37 90 02- 116-30 -10 -0210 Janes 6 Susan Marka 640 Park Island Dr. 23-383 -0070 Hutchins.., MN 55350 SON Add. to Lakewood Terrace 5 2 1 28.8 $ 3,544.81 91 02- 116 -30 -10 -0220 Ronald It Rosello Jonas 1055 Jorgenson St. 23- 383 -0080 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 1 3 I 0 t 2,859.37 92 02-116 -30- 10-0230 Laura Poser McDonald Trailer Court 23 -383 -0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 2 3 1 0 $ 2,859.37 • f Y l 93 02- 116 -30 -10 -0240 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Box 580 23 -383 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 94 02-116 -30-10 -0250 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Boa 580 23- 383 -0110 Hutchinson, MM 55350 95 02- 116 -30 -10 -0260 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Boa 580 23 -383 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -14 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 3 3 1 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT N0, 90 -14 2,859.37 5th CAG 6 BIT. COST PFR LOT S 2,859.37 Lakewood COMPILED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG CONSTRUCTION OF CURB 6 GUTTER, BITUMINOUS SURFACING 6 APPURTENANCES CONC. DRIVEWAY COST PER SQUARE YO. S 23.80 2,859.37 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG MCOONALD DRIVE 8 PARK ISLAND DRIVE IN 5TH ADDITION 10 LAKEWOOD TERRACE NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 CHECKED BY: ___________________________________________________ CAL RICE __ _____ ___ ____ ____________ PAGE 15 OF 16 ACCT. CITY c'0 NUMBER ____ LOT BLOCK STREET DRIVEWAY TOTAL _ NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME G ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. NO. PER LOT SO. YD. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 93 02- 116 -30 -10 -0240 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Box 580 23 -383 -0100 Hutchinson, MN 55350 94 02-116 -30-10 -0250 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Boa 580 23- 383 -0110 Hutchinson, MM 55350 95 02- 116 -30 -10 -0260 Loretta McDonald 1555 McDonald Dr., Boa 580 23 -383 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -14 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 3 3 1 0 3 2,859.37 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 4 3 1 0 $ 2,859.37 5th Add. to Lakewood Terrace 5 3 1 0 $ 2,859.37 $ 35,630.96 40 ■ ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5, PROJECT NO. 90 -18 COST PER FRONT FOOT $ 32.50 COMPILED BY: JOHN P. ROOERERG CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB 6 GUTTER, BITUMINOUS, NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD 10 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. RODEBERG BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANCES PAGE 16 OF 16 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE --------------------- LIND STREET FROM JED AVENUE N.V. TO RAILROAD (RACKS ACCT. CITY PIO NUMBER __..___-_--------- .,---------- -_________-------- ..------- „-------------------------------- LOT BLOCK . ------ _----------------------- DRIVEWAY TOTAL NO. COUNTY PID NUMBER NAME b ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. FRONTAGE S0. Y0. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 96 31 -13 -0060 Roger Dostal 8 Roger Olesun `-`- 201 LInU St. S75' of Lots 4 8 5, 23- 056 -2590 Hutchinson, MN 55350 N 112 City 28 75 $ 2.437.50 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -18 f 2.437.50 TOTAL - PROJECT N0. 90-05 3 38,830.10 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90-06 3 60,652.26 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -07 $216,359.92 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90 -13 $ 17,468.73 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90-14 $ 35,630.96 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 90-18 f 2,437.50 TOTAL - LETTING NO. 5 $371,379.47 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 9281 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 259 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NOS. 90 -05, 90 -06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for improvement of: Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Street from 6th Avenue to South Termini by Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter. Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90-D6 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.M. 7 to North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90-07 - Hilltop Drive, Pauls Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and Garden Road by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.N. to Railroad Tracks by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first Installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment. from October 1st, 1990. until the 31st day of December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no Interest shall be charged If the entire Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Island Drive in the 5th Addition to lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -18 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.N. to Railroad Tracks by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first Installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment. from October 1st, 1990. until the 31st day of December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no Interest shall be charged If the entire RESOLUTION NO. 9281 PAGE 2 assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1990; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with Interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. 0. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over In the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. yor City Administrator 0 0 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING 610 AND AWARDING CONTRACT RESOLUTION No. 9282 LETTING 90. S PROJECT NOS. 90-05, 90-06, 90 -07, 90 -13, 90 -14, 90 -18 u WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of: Project No. 90 -05 - Carlisle Steet from 6th Avenue to South Termini by Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter. Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -06 - Florida Street and Illinois Street from T.H. 7 to North Termini by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Storm Sewer, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -07 - Hilltop Drive, Paul Road, Lindy Lane, Mark Drive and Garden Road by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -13 - Campbell Court in McClure's 2nd Addition by the Construction Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -14 - McDonald Drive and Park Island Drive in the 5th Addition to Lakewood Terrace by the Construction of Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 90 -I8 - Lind Street from 3rd Avenue N.M. to Railroad Tracks by the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and Appurtenances; i s Bidder Amount Bid Duininck Bros., Inc. i 384,797.00 Wm. Mueller d Sons, Inc. f 409,022.70 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Buininck Bros., Inc. of Prinsburg, Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Duininck Bros., Inc. of Prinsburg, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the Director of Engineering. 2. The City Administrator 1s hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of June, 1990. u City Administrator Mayor WRITTEN OBJECTION TO PROPOSED ASSESSMENT UNDER ASSESSMENT RULE NO. 259 TO: The City of Hutchinson YOU ARE HEREBY placed on notice that we, the property owners of property in project no. 90 -07 described as: Tract 200' x 400' Lot 10 & 11 A.P. Lot 14 A.P. W % Sec. 32- 117 -29 hereby object to the assessment. Objection is taken to the fact of any assessment whatsoever, or as to the amount as indicated on the preliminary notice based upon the fact that our property will not benefit as a result of the project. Date: June 1990. arold Thompson Lennie Thompson / C� 1 P n 0 E PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12TH, 1990 • PUBLICATION NO. 4131 NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 261 Hutchinson, Minnesota June 11th, 1990 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the Council will meet at 8:00 P.N. on the 26th day Of June, 1990, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the activating of deferred assessments on .Jefferson Street Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements. You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by October 1st, 1990. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged through December 31st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 9 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until October 1st, 1990. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $6,054.40 Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has further questions. 2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same proeedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. (i I RESOLUTION NO. 4131 PAGE 2 4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applies; however, they • may be considered and argued to the Council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council. 5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded. 6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator. Under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property. Gary D. P1 z, City Xdministrator City of Hutchinson, Minnesota 0 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 261 LFTTING NO. 13, PROJECT NO. 90 -23 SANITARY SEVER COST /LINEAL FOOT: S 5.98 COMPILED BY: .)OHM P. ROOEBERG ACTIVATING DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS FOR JEFFERSON STREET YATERMAIN COST /LINEAL FOOT: f 11.62 COMPUTED BY: JOHN P. ROOEBERG SANITARY SEWER AND YATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS NUMBER OF YEARS SPREAD: 10 CHECKED BY: CAL RICE PAGE I OF t ACCT. CITY P10 NUMBER 23- 210 -0110 LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE SAN. SEW. YATERMAIN TOTAL NO. COUNTY RID NUMBER NAME B ADDRESS OF OWNER ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION NO. N0. AREA S. F. LIN. FT. LIN. FT. CREDITS ASSESSMENT 01 07- 116 -29 -02 -0060 Delwin A E. Derlfield 1125 .Jefferson St. So. 100' x 253' of Lot 3, 23- 210 -0110 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Add. Plat Sec. 7- 116 -29 100 100 4 1,760.00 02 07- 116 -29- 02-0070 Richard 6 Gloria Paul 1135 Jefferson St. So. Part of Lot 3, 23- 230-0090 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Aud. Plat Sec. 7-116-29 110 110 f 1,936.00 03 07- 116 -29 -02 -0090 Eugene A Pearl Schlmmell 1205 Jefferson St. S0. Part of Lot 3, 23- 230 -0120 Hutchinson, MN 55350 Aud. Plat Sec. 7- 116-29 134 130 4 2,358.40 cc: .lames Chalupsty Country Club Manor Bldg. 765 #101 Hutchinson, MN 55350 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 261 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- f 6,054.40 R. 1� RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION NO. 9286 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 261 LETTING NO. 13 PROJECT NO. 90 -23 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for activating of deferred assessments for Jefferson Street Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Improvements; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCH INSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in hereby found to be benefitted by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be Payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear Interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October Ist, 1990, until the 31st day of December, 1991. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 1st day of October, 1990; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th, or interest will be charged through December 31st, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. Mayor 0 City Administrator PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, JUNE 12TH, 1990 AND ON TUESDAY, JUNE 19TH, 1990 • PUBLICATION NO. 4130 NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 10 PROJECT NO. 90-20 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson. Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 26th day of June, 1990, to consider the making of an improvement of the South Fork Crow River Dam Reconstruction (for dam, dike and related recreational activities), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, hereby determined to be the City of Hutchinson and the Hutchinson Utilities Commission. The estimated assessable City Cost of said improvement is $68,000. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. 0 Dated: June 11th, 1990 Gary D. PJotz City Administrator 9 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION N0. 9285 LETTING NO. 10 PROJECT NO. 90 -20 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adapted the 14th day of November, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of the South Fork Crow River Dam Reconstruction (for dam, dike and related recreational activities); NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Director of Engineering is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. ayor City Administrator 1 0 0 _�--JD- (612) 587 -5151 ;varcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 MEMO June 21, 1990 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WORKER'S COMPENSATION & LIABLITLITY /PP.OPERTY RENE'4AL Renewal of our worker's Compensation and Liabiltiy policies are set for renewal as of July 1. We have received a premium renewal notice with a premium of $236,496. This is the premium for the Utilites, Hospital, and the City proper. ( Burns Manor 'ras gone to a separate policy.) Mark Flaten, of American Risk Services, our insurance risk manager, has given us a break down of the premium. It shows both a cost based upon a standard premium and cost of a retrospective premium options, and the associated risk. I have attached the worksheet for your information. We do not yet have the cost on the 1990/91 liability /property coverages. Dennis Potter will have the renewal numbers with him on Tuesday right. He will have a work, sheet detailing those cost and how they compare to our present policy. Dennis did say the prelimary numbers he had been given didn't seem to change greatly from our 1989/90 policy period. Because of our 1990 budget restriction at the time of prepartation, it was decided not to renew the Umbrella policy currently in effect. The State of Minnesota does give statue limitation liability protection at $600,000 which is the dollar amounts our liablity policies carry. Cost of the $1,000,000 Umbrella policy for the 1989/90 year was $31,031. Again, our 1990 budget does not contain any dollars for umbrella coverage. Named Insured: City of Hutchinson Policy Period: 7/1/90 -91 Evaluation: 301,338 Carrier: LMCIT Losses Valued as of: 10.82% Total Fvrf riu:co \1,xii!icatio n: 0.88 1l'ei�htd Moditlwtion- la0ities Standard Premium: 301,338 hkdilid Standard Premium: 265,177 Premium Discount 10.82% Di;couuted Premium: 236,496 Basic Factor: 0.35 Minimum Premium Factor: 35,00% Maximum Premium Factor: 125.00% Loss Conversion Factor: 1,10 Ex. css Loss Premium Factor: 0.00% Tax Multiplier: 1 Loss Limitation: 0 Basic Premium: 82,774 Excess Loss Premium: 0 Atimimum Premium: 82,774 Maximum Premium: 331,472 Loss Content @ Maximum: 226,089 Retrospective Rating Citv Hospital Burns Manor la0ities 0.82 0.88 0.00 1.18 0.81 0.87 0.00 1.17 109,898 158,227 0 33,213 88,985 137,492 0 38,700 79,361 122,622 0 34,514 135.00% 135.00% 135.00% 135.00% 27,776 42,918 0 12,080 0 0 0 0 27,776 42,918 0 12,080 120,130 185,615 0 52,244 83,958 129,725 0 36,513 14- Jun -90 i 0 I * Prepard Bv: American Risk Services, Inc. /f City of Hutchinson 26- Jun -90 1986 -87 - 1987 -88 1988 -89 1989 -90 1990 -91 90 -91 - 90 -91 i ect of Insurance LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT Change Purcentaee Property 42,863 40,531 62,589 - 59,175 61,852 2,677 4.524 - Limits: 19,615,660 20,007,973 35,856,138 36,573,261 39,864,854 3,291,593 9.004 Rate per (00's): 0.219 0.203 0.175 0.162 0.155 4.114 - - Inland Marine 2,534 2,662 2,958 3,239 3,072 (167) -5.164 Boiler & Machinery 9,267 9,267 - 7,809 7,809 7,809 0 0.004 Fidelity Boad 2,542 2,542 3,886 3,886 3,886 0 Crime 669 669 743 743 743 0 0.004 Automobile 30,193 29,231 32,478 40,712 39,591 (1,121) -2.754 $600,000 CSL Liability Deductible: 0 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 Compr:Lensive Deductible: 250 250 5,000 5,000 5,000 Collision Deductible: 500 500 5,000 5,000 5,000 General Liability 89,776 96,930 107,700 94,547 98,960 4,413 4.674 Inverse Condemnation 0 4,456 4,650 194 $600,000 CSL , Liability Deductible: 0 0 _ 5,000 5,000 5,000 -- Compensation 166,131 213,249 212,056 154,758 236,496 81,738 52.824 • Workers' Ezpericnce Modification: 1.03 0.95 0.85 0.76 0.88 15.794 Payroll: 7,058,311 7,582,497 8,640,033 7,433,609 9,461,618 2,028,039 27.284 Average Rate: 2.29 2.96 2.89 2.74 2.84 0.10 3.694 Umbrella 42,414 41,379 33,760 28,966 30,000 1,034 3.574 $1,000,000 CSL Liquor Liability 10,746 14,238 15,169 9,898 11,010 1,142 11.544 Limit of Liability: 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Public Officials Liability 15,082 11,167 12,408 12,251 14,281 2,030 16.574 $600,000 Liability Deductible: 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Reserve Assessment-. 14,896 Total 427,113 461,865 491,556 420,440 512,380 91,940 21.874 $5,000 Per OceurreacciSM,000 Aggregate 218,133 209,924 217,756 Maimcoeace Deductible - $1,000 510,000 Per OccurrenccJS100,000 Aggregate 204,500 196,804 204,146 Maintenance Deductible - $1,000 Prepared By: American Risk Services, Inc. • 26- 1411-90 90 -91 90 -91 Ch. ranee Pcrccntaec 343,673 Prepared By: American Risk Services, Inc. City of Hutchillsoll 1986 -87 1987 -88 1988 -89 1989 -90 1990 -91 biect of Insurance LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT LMCIT Standard Deductibles - 180,448 180,521 272,666 262,405 272,195 Deductible Savings 0 0 54,533 52,481 54,439 Dividends 0 19,000 29,681 50,331 Rctro Return (Additional) 0 100,612 1,625 Losses Paid who Deductible 0 0 10,018 9,011 (includes Reserves) Surplus Available 0 119,612 .75,821 93,801 54,439 • 26- 1411-90 90 -91 90 -91 Ch. ranee Pcrccntaec 343,673 Prepared By: American Risk Services, Inc. DAVID B. R. CAR CHARLES H. GAHMIC HAEL GARY D. M-DO.ELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON G. BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. HOLE LAURA H. FRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEGOEMANN PAUL D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLEY JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICHARD G. McGEE TIMOTHY W. FAFINSEI June 18, 1990 AI?NOLD & McDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 5881 GEDAH LAKE ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 -1492 OP 00.s.L WILLIAM W. CAMERON CHARLES CLAYTON GARY W. BECEER (812) 545 -9000 MN TOLL FREE 800 -343 -4545 CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS TELECOPIER (812) 545-1793 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371 (612)389 -2214 TELECOPIER(612) 389 -5506 Mr. Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Deferred Compensation Plan Our File #: 3188 -87 -0030 Dear Gary: 101 PARR PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 (612) 587-7595 TELECOPIER(612)587 -4090 1w 1P10; 1990 .,A1 \CE 2l After further reflection, I conclude that it was appropriate that the city council adopt the deferred compensation plan by resolution and I am enclosing the proposed form of the Resolution to be attached to the plan. If you have any questions or problems in connection with the foregoing, you certainly should feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & McDOWELL G. Barry A W,1 erson GB lls Enc re * CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION RESOLUTION NO. 9288 0 RESOLUTION ADOPTING 457 GENERIC DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has adopted various deferred compensation programs for its employees; and WHEREAS, uniformity among the deferred compensation plans is desirable; and WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has not previously adopted a generic or uniform deferred compensation plan, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Hutchinson City Council for and on behalf of the City of Hutchinson as follows: The City of Hutchinson adopts the attached Section 457 generic deferred compensation plan. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of June, 1990. 0 Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: ary D. Plot City Administrator 9 7 A. Updated 4/16/90 (7 -1 -89) ORDINANCE NO. 90 -21 8 U8- ANAL ?8I8 Title page CHAPTER 12 SUBDIVISION RRGM ATIOAS (PLATTING) 363 Section 12.01 General Requirements . 12.02 Definitions. ' ' ' ' ' ' 363 . . 12.03-12.08 Reserved 361 12.09 Sketch Plan 12.10 Preliminary Plat . 12 .11 -12.19 367 Reserved 12.20 Final Plat 1 2.21 -12.39 Reserved 371 12,40 Minimum Improvements Required. . . . . . , 374 Subd. 1 General. . . Subd. 2 Official Map . 374 . . . . . . . . . Subd. 3 Drainage and Flood Hazard Areas. Subd. 4 374 374 Community Assets . . . . . . . . Subd. 5 Monuments and Stakes 374 . . . . . . 375 Subd. 6 Public Site and Open Spaces. . . Subd. 7 375 Street and Block Layout. Subd. 8 Minimum Widths for Streets and 377 Alley Right -of -Way . . . , . . , 379 Subd. 9 Minimum Pavement Widths and Surface Type . . . . . . . . . . Subd. 10 Street Grade, Curves and Sign 380 Distances. . Subd. 11 Intersections. 38 . . . . . . S ubd. 12 Lots . 38 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383 Subd. 13 Utilities and Drainage Subd. 14 383 Other Requirements Subd. 15 Subdivision Agreements 385 . . . . . Subd. 16 Easements. 386 Subd. 17 Public Utilities 12.41 -12.59 Reserved 386 387 12.60 Modification and Exceptions. . . . 12.61 -12.69 Reserved 389 12.70 Enforcement. 12.71 Schedule of Fees, Charges and �: enses 12.72-12.79 p 390 390 Reserved 12.80 Variances. . . . . . 12.81 Special Application Requirements . , . . ' 12.82 -12.98 391 391 .Reserved 12.99 Violation a Misdemeanor. . . . . . . , • 392 (7 -1 -89) SEC. 12.09. SKETCH PLAN. Subd. 1. Submission to Planning Commission uie Plan. B) A rough sketch of the site showing its general shape and adiacent roadway, waterways and any other significant features . of the immediate area. C) Type of development proposed Subd. 1. Advisory Keating With City Planning Staff. Before preparing a Preliminary Plat and submitting it to the Planning Commission for approval, and after submitting the Sketch Pl an. the subdivider shall meet the consult informally with the City Planning Staff for the purpose of reviewing the locations of proposed major streets, parks, playgrounds, school sites, and other planned projects which may affect the property being considered for subdivision. At the same meeting, the subdivider shall review with the City Planning Staff the minimum standards of subdivision design set forth in Section 12.40. This informal review should prevent unnecessary and costly revisions in the layout and development of the subdivision. Formal application or filing of a plat with the B. Submission of a subdiv ision sketch elan shall not A) Site Location SEC. 12.10. PRELIMINARY PLAT. i i City is not required for this informal advisory meeting. Subd. 2. Preliminary Plat Required. Before submission of a Final Plat, the subdivider shall prepare and submit to the City Administrator Preliminary Plats of the land he proposes to develop as described in Subdivision 4, Subparagraph B of this Section. The Preliminary Plats shall be submitted only after the advisory meeting with the City Planning Staff and prior to the making of any street improvements or the installation of anv Subd. 3. Preliminary Plat Data. The Preliminary Plat shall meet the standards of design as set forth in Section 12.40 and shall show the following information: larger. A. Scale of one hundred (100) feet to one (1) inch or B. Name of subdivision, name and address of the owners, the engineer or surveyor, and the owners of the adjacent property. C. Location of subdivision by section, town, range or other legal description together with small scale sketch showing location within the section. D. Date of preparation and of latest rev applicable? , approximate north point, and graphic scale. E. Acreage of land to be subdivided. F. Zoning classification of lands to be subdivided and all adjacent lands within 300' of the Preliminary Plat G. Boundary lines of area to be subdivided, their bearings and distances, and total acreage calculated to the nearest 0.1 acre. H. Existing and proposed easements and their locations, widths, and distances. I—. Street. lot line and easement locations within loot of the proposed plat J. i K. Lot line, lot numbers, dimensions. 2 and approximate lot L. Sites and their acreages, if any, to be reserved or . dedicated for parks, recreation areas, open spaces, schools, or other public uses. Sites, if any, for semi - public, commercial, or multi - family uses. M. Minimum building setback lines. N. Location of railroads, streams, lakes, marshes wooded areas, drainage tiles natural and proposed drainage courses, permanent buildings, and other structures or significant physical features O. If the Preliminary Plat is a rearrangement or a roadway's shall be shown by dotted or dashed lines P. Certification by Registered Land Surveyor certifying to accuracy and Preparation of Plat Q. UTILITY PLAN: A plan for utility service shall be presented with the Preliminary Plat. The Utility Plan shall include: Utilities on and adjacent to the tract showing proposed connections to existing utility systems. Data to be provided includes types of utility; location of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain lines, manholes, catch basins, hydrants, etc; Approximate manhole and catch basin rim and invert elevations size of pipe, direction of flow and reguir utilitv easements_ PA C14mil T# in diameter or greater shall be shown 1. Existing contours at two (2) foot intervals in dashed lines and proposed contours at two (2) foot intervals in heavier solid lines. Provisions to protect existing natural 6. Proposed garage slab and lowest floor -•.- ?. Floodway. Flood Fringe Boundaries and 100 Year Flood Elevations. S. Additional Information to be Supplied v G 1 V U111=1 I I 2. 3. Copies of proposed deed restrictions, if any. 4. Other reasonable information, such as percolation or other soil tests, if so requested by the Planning Commission in order to make a proper review of the site. S Subd. 4. Preliminary Plat Procedures. A. Prior to submittal of the Preliminary Plat, in the case of any proposed plat which includes lands abutting upon any existing or established trunk highway or proposed highway which has been designated by a center line order found in the office of the County Recorder, the plat shall first be presented to the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation for his written comments and recommendations. The Commissioner of the Department of Transportation shall submit written comments to the City in accordance with State law. In requesting the comments of the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation, the subdivider shall include a written statement describing the outlet for and means of disposal of surface waters in the proposed platted area. 0 4 B. Four copies of the Preliminary Plat and supplementary material specified shall be submitted to the City Administrator for filing with a written application for conditional approval. C. The City Administrator shall, upon receipt of a Preliminary Plat, retain one copy, refer one copy to the Zoning Administrator, and refer two copies to the Engineer for review as to completeness of information. If found to be incomplete, the application will be returned to the developer. If found to be complete, the plat will be referred to other City Department Heads, the Utilities Commission, the Telephone Company and Cable T.V., for review as necessary. D. Upon review by City Department Heads, the City Attorney, the City Forester, the Utilities Commission, the Telephone Company and Cable T.v., the copy of the plat together with all comments and suggested revisions shall be referred to the Planning Commission for a public hearing. The Preliminary Plat shall receive the approval of the Engineer as to engineering considerations prior to consideration by the Planning Commission. A certificate of approval by the Engineer shall be attached to the Preliminary Plat. A letter of recommendation from the City Forester in regard to the preservation and future planting of E. The City shall notify the subdivider by mail of the time and place of the public hearing not less than five (5) days before the date fixed for the hearing. Similar notice shall be mailed to the owners of the land immediately adjoining the area to be subdivided as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Time and place of the public hearing shall be published at least once in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. The publication shall include a drawing which shows the location of the proposed subdivision. 0 F. Within sixty (60) days after the hearing on the Preliminary Plat, the Planning Commission shall recommend approval, disapproval, or approval subject to modifications of the said plat to the Council. Failure of the Planning Commission to act on the Preliminary Plat within sixty (60) days shall be deemed a recommendation of approval of the plat. If a plat is recommended for disapproval, reasons for such disapproval must be stated in writing. If approval subject to modifications is recommended, the nature of the required modifications shall be indicated in writing. The Planning Commission shall then forward the Preliminary Plat together with its recommendations to the Council for final action. The final action of the Council shall be noted on two (2) copies of the Preliminary Plat with any notations made at the time of approval, disapproval of the specific changes required. One (1) 5 copy shall be returned to the subdivider and the other placed on file in the office of the City Administrator. G. Approval of the Preliminary Plat shall not constitute acceptance of the Final Plat. The approval of the Preliminary Plat shall lapse unless a Final Plat based thereon is submitted within sixty (60) months from the date of such approval. An extension of time may be applied for by the subdivider and granted by the Council. Bubd. s. Plat Review Charge. A filing fee will be charged at the time of filing the Preliminary Plat to offset administrative costs in processing the application submitted; no additional fee will be charged for filing a Final Plat. Such fee will be computed on the basis of a minimum fee as determined by resolution of the Council. 0 0 0 Sec. 12.60. MODIFICATION AND EZCEPTIONS. Subd• 1. Major Subdivisions. The general principles of design and minimum requirements for the layout of subdivisions set forth in Section 12.40 may be varied by the Council in the case of a subdivision large enough to constitute a more or less self - contained neighborhood which is to be developed in accordance with a comprehensive plan safeguarded by appropriate restrictions, and which, in the judgment of the Council, makes adequate provision for all essential community requirements; provided, however, that no modification shall be granted by the Council which would conflict with the proposals of the Official Map or with the other features of the City Comprehensive Plan, or with the intent and purposes of said general principles of design and minimum requirements. S subdivision of small size Small the case f a and minoriimportance n situated in a locality where conditions are well- defined, and containing not more than two lots fronting on an existing street not involving any new street or road or the extension of municipal facilities and not adversely affecting the adjoining property, the Council may exempt stipulated in Section 12.10 pertaining to the preparation of the Preliminary Plat. All _subdivisions larnnr *,,.- . __ Subd. 3. Unusual Physical Conditions. In any Particular case where the subdivider can show that, by reason of exceptional topographic or other physical conditions, strict compliance with any requirement of this Chapter would cause unusual difficulty or exceptional and undue hardship, the Council may relax such requirement to the extent deemed just and proper, so as to relieve such difficulty and undue hardship, provided that such relief may be granted without detriment to the public good and without impairing the intent and purposes of these regulations or the desirable general development of the neighborhood and the community in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Chapter. Any modification thus granted shall be entered in the minutes of the Council setting forth the reasons which, in the opinion of the Council, justified the modification. (Section 12.61 through 12.69, inclusive, reserved for future expansion.) Ammendment to page 389 (4- 16 -90) 0 PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 90 -2 2, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 6.26, SUED. 3(E) GOVERNING BINGO; AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS. THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS: Section 1. City Code, Sec. 6.26, Subd. 3(e) entitled "Special Bingo Regulations" is hereby amended to read: E. Special Bingo Regulations. Bingo shall only be conducted by an organization which has been in existence for at least three (3) years, has at least thirty (30) active members and on premises which it owns or leases. Section 2. City Code, Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this _ day of , 1990. Mayor Attest: City Administrator First Reading June 26, 1990 Second Reading July 10, 1990 Published in the , 19 u 0 11 June 26, 1990 To: Mayor Paul Ackland and the members of the Hutchinson City Council Subject: Withdrawal of a Proposal for Roberts Park Beer Sales by the Hutchinson Huskies The Hutchinson Huskies Amateur Baseball Association respectively withdraws its proposal to operate the beer concession at Roberts Park on weekdays. Because of the concern we have for the youth of the City of Hutchinson, we want to avoid sending any kind of conflicting messages to them about the illegal use of alcohol by minors. Two original objectives for this project were to find another way to provide needed revenues for the Hutchinson Huskies town team and also to share that revenue with the City of Hutchinson Park and Recreation Dept. to be used for continued improvements on Roberts Park. Plans were in place to prevent access to alcohol by minors. It has always been our intent and desire to service coupled with proper control of beer ADULTS ONLY at the park, but because of the by some of the council members and citizens will attempt to utilize other methods to fi Hutchinson Huskies. provide better consumption by concern expressed of Hutchinson, we Zance the We appreciate the support of the Park and Recreation Department and we will continue to cooperate with both the Department and the City of Hutchinson to improve park facilities and provide GREAT summer entertainment for area baseball fans. Thank you for your cooperation. Hutchinson Huskies Amateur Baseball Association Ll- //� 0 yam/ 5 16 171 ? ?2� RECEIVED BY �n� CP v June 14th, 1990 Major Paul Ackland & City Council. s �£2i - icon , fhen I read in the paper that the city council was considering allowin< them to sell beer at softball games I was appalled. We have enou -h of a problem with minors consuming, alchol in hutchinson without helping to make it easier yet to obtain: - elides the city parks hardly seem to be the proper place to sell beer. We happen to live right across from Roberts Park & tail gate partys are still going stron at 2:00 A.M. in the morning,with lights all on,wllat will it be with alcohol being sold in the same nark. "lust we as concerned citizens get up a petition to get the city council to keeo our parks what they where meant to be a play ground for our children:please vote no on behalf of all city kids, not yes for adult entertainment. Thank you. Floyd Kruger 134 McDonalds Lakeview ::utchinson,Minn 55350 -7q* 2��v q 0 LA BORE & GIULIANI, LTD. LEE L. LA BORE EMILIO R. GIULIANI BRADLEY T. COSGRIFF MICHAEL T. HUGHES STEVEN L. VILTOFT LEGAL ASSISTANTS. MICHELE M. HUDIN5KI JAN SAUER May 9, 1990 Mr. Gary Plotz City Administrator CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 Washington Avenue West lutchinson, MN 55350 SUITE 150 HOPKINS OFFICE CENTER 33 SOUTH TENTH AVENUE P.O. BOX 70 HOPKINS, MINNESOTA 55343.0070 TELEPHONE (612) 933.3371 FAX 16121933 -x298 Ey Dear Mr. Plotz: Pursuant to contract and on behalf of Junker Sanitation I hereby submit for Council consideration to be discussed at the Board of Review meeting in June, 1990 the following commercial rates which are proposed as rates for containers in the City of Hutchinson. You will note that the rate proposal is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A. Also at the Board of Review meeting, we would like the City Council to address the mobile home trai er par known as Country Club Terrace. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit B is a letter to Junker Sanitation from William R. Block indicating a payment of $2.50 per lot for trash removal in the trailer home park. It is the feeling of Junker Sanitation that the residence in the trailer home park should be billed as of er residential units in the City of Hutchinson because the trash that t ey generate Ts equa to and, in fact, surpasses a residence in Hutchinson because the contract requires Junker to pick up everything. As you know, the trailer park has people moving in and out on a more frequent basis than the normal residential community in Hutchinson. As a result, more trash in generated. You will note that the increase in containe costs are $ 6.00 per month per container. This increase is due not only to operational expenses of Junker Sanitation, but also to the need of increased salaries for the employees of Junker Sanitation and, of course, as you all know, the increases due to the expected dump fee increase of 25% which will go into effect June 1, 1990. Dump fees for 1989 for the City of Hutchinson for January through December were $274,036.00. The dump fees will be increased by 257 commencing June 1, 1990 and the anticipated increase will be . $68,509.00 for total dump fees from June 1, 1990 to June 1, 1991 of $342,545.00. The above figure does not take into consideration any increase in yardage taken to the landfill. To say the least, the dump fees have increased 1,450; since C7 May 9, 1990 Page two 19$0 when the total dump fees for the City of Hutchinson were only $23,794.00. " ccording to the contract, the increase in commercial rates goes into effect July 1 L: of each year so we would appreciate receiving a date for the Board of Review meeting for sometime in June of 1990. If there is any additional information you would like to receive for the Board of Review please advise. Yours truly, LaBo e 6 Giuliani, Ltd. a Lee L. LaBore LLL /ml Enclosure cc: Ms. Alison Lutterman Mr. James Junket 0 PROPOSED RATE INCREASE FOR CONTAINER SERVICE: HUTCHINSON . YD. CONTAINER DAYS PER WEEK AlMOUNT /MONTH 1 1 $ 37.20 into effer- ?r"� 2 66.40 3 93.60 4 120.80 5 148.00 6 175.20 1} 1 $ 44.20 2 76.40 3 108.60 4 140,80 5 173.00 6 205.20 2 1 $ 49.20 2 86.40 3 123.60 4 160.80 5 198.00 6 235.20 3 1 $ 54.20 2 96.40 3 138.60 4 180.80 5 223.00 6 265.20 4 1 $ 59.20 2 106.40 3 153.60 4 200.00 5 248.00 6 295.20 6 1 $ 74.20 2 126.40 3 178.60 4 230.80 5 283.80 6 335.20 8 1 $ 89.20 2 156.40 3 223.60 4 290.00 5 358.00 6 425.20 Increases are due to increase in operating expenses and a 257 increase in In'4f:l.l fees v:? rc_s into effer- ?r"� HUTCH, INC. 363 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD • ST. PAUL, MN • 551 of January 28, 1988 JUNKLR SANITATION, INC. P.O. BOX 246 Stillwater, Minnesota 55082 Attention: Mr. James L. Junker Gentleman: EXHIBIT B f Attached please find our check No. 1016 in the amount of $475 for trash removal service for the month of December at Country Club Terrace MHP in Hutchinson. The amount is based on $2.50 /lot for the 190 trash producing homes in the park in December. Hutch, Inc. purchased the park on December 1, 1987 from Mr. Gordy Hedlund. Mr. Hedlund informed us that he has bean paying $2.50 /lot for trash removal and has continuously advised you company to discontinue hauling if that rate was not satisfactory Your December 31, 1987 invoice No. 60510 shows a one month charge of $1640.50 for trash re. a rate of $8.63 /lot which is unprecedented in the mobile home park business. Please be advised that we are willing to pay Jur. er Sanitation at a rate of $2.50 /mo /lot for trash removal service. If this rate is unacceptable, please contact the undersigned Very truly yours, HUTCH, INC. LL William R. Block WRB:ad LA BORE & GmLLa.*n, LTD. • LEE L. U. BORE EMILIO R. GIULIANI BRADLEY T. COSGRIFF MICHAEL T. HUGHES STEVEN L. VILTOFT LEGAL ASSISTANTS: MICHELE M. HUDINSKI JAN SAUER June 11, 1990 SUITE 150 HOPKINS OFFICE CENTER 33 SOUTH TENTH AVENUE P.O. BOX 70 HOPKINS. MINNESOTA SS3 3 -0070 TELEPHONE (6121 933-3371 FAX (612)933 -8298 Dear Members of the City Counsel and Staff of the City of Hutchinson: Enclosed please find Mr. Junker's expenses for last year and requested rate increase. Starting July 1, 1990 will start the third year that his an increase in salary and furthermore, there are two very that will need replacing, a 1978 Mack and a 1980 Ford. Thank you for your consideration and I hope you will look increase. Yours truly, Lee L. La Bore on bahalf of James Junker d/b /a Junker Sanitation LLL /yf Enclosure employees have not had old 25 yard ccrrpactors favorably upon this rate f I. Expenses Salaries Casual Labor Payroll Taxes Truck Expenses R,cairs, Parts, Replacement & Dump Services Supplies Building Maintenance Clai Reserve Advertising Donations Dues and Miscellaneous Insurance Legal Account Licenses Medical Rentals Building and Equipment Utilities and Telephone Office Booceeping D�- areci�tion Errpioy =_e Retirement Plan Intcrest Corporation Taxes Entertainment Profit 12% =1 $137,884.00 $ 550.00 $ 12,836.00 $ 41,886.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 558.00 $ 5,734.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 606.00 $ 750.00 $ 410.00 $ 26,890.00 $ 6,450.00 $ 3,591.00 $ 10,220.00 $ 25,050.00 $ 4,937.00 $ 4,350.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 5,735.00 $ 92.00 $ 1,650.00 $ 42,741.00 $398,920.00 II. Du mo Fees Estimate - 30,000 yards @ $14.00 per yard plus $2.00 tax yard = 30,000 x $16.00 = $460.000.00 III. Total - $398,920.00 Expenses $480,000.00 Amp fees $878,920.00 �JN- VI. Commercial Represents 30% $878,920.00 x 30°% = $263,676.00 $878,920.00 Total Ob $263,676.00 Commercial $615,676.00 V. Number of Monthly Billings - 3459 Residential 3294 Duplex 96 Senior Citiz ns 60 Three Plex 9 vj, Monthly Rate on Last Year's Expenses $615,676.00 divided by 3459 = $14.83 per month VII. Anticipated Increase in Expenses a) Salaries - $7,500.00 as of July 1, 1990, it will make the third year without a ,alary increase; b) There are two 25 yard cce pactors which need replacement; 1) a 1978 Mack 2) a 1980 - ($200,000.00) c) There are five p 4 _ckup trucks one needs replacing in 1990 and another in 1991. ($30,000.00) d) b and c allocated over six years $230,000.00 divided by 6 = $38,333. VIII. $38,333.00 trucks $ 7,500.00 salaries $45,833.00 divided by 3459 = $1.35. Recuested increase a` $16.18. 0 (672). Ha�cH;` CITY OF HUTCH �INSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: Jun 26, 1990 TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Water Billing Department SUBJECT: Del inquent water & sewer accounts for the month of Jun Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts for the month of Jun. Recommend water service be discontinued on Monday, July 2nd, 1990 at Noon. is • I� 1- 290 - 0216 -073 1- 455 - 0845 -074 Dan Skorseth Doug Hickler 216 Cedar Av 845 Grove St S Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 216 Cedar Av 845 Grove St S 93.59 100.73 Promises 6/27/90 1- 295 - 0120 -072 1- 550 -0736 -031 Gary Aanderude George Suess 120 Century Av E 736 Ivy Lane Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 120 Century Av E 736 Ivy Lane 202.62 76.89 Promises 6/28/90 1- 360 -0215 -034 1- 570 - 0814 -046 Darol Wylie Larry Schuette 215 Division Av 814 Jefferson St S Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 215 Division Av 814 Jefferson St S 59.56 76.16 Promises 7/02/90 cc: Delbert Blumhardt Charles Pearson 2525 Cty Rd I 1- 395 - 0505 -015 Moundsview MN 55112 Barbara Heller 1- 680 - 0206 -071 505 Franklin St S Ellictts Eatery Hutchinson MN 55350 206 Main St N 505 Franklin St S Hutchinson MN 55350 149.21 206 Ma.'-r. St N 1- 455-0316 -071 322.37 1- 395 - 0645 -022 1 -685- 0817 -034 Andrew Ross David Hickle 645 Franklin St S 817 Main St S Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 645 Franklin St S 817 Main St S 149.45 1(-9.72 1- 455 - 0026 -081 cc: Ben Menton Charles Pearson Raute 1 Box 16 26 Grove St S Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Promises $84.86 6/27 26 Greve St S balance 7/02/90 97.26 Promises 7/10/90 1 -725- 0148 -052 1- 455-0316 -071 Greg DeWitte Gary Piehl 148 Milwaukee Av 316 Grove St S Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350 148 Milwaukee Av 316 Grove St S 121.10 109.13 Promises 7/09/90 and J /i / J 11 (612) 587 -5151 HarcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 NIASHING TON AVENUE WEST - HUTCH /NSON, MINN. 55350 MEMO June 21, 1990 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL ------------------------------------------- FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CHRISTMAS DECORATION RESERVE FUNDS The city has reserved funds over the past years in the General Fund for Christmas decorations. Through 1989 the amount reserved was $16,000. Our 1990 budget contains an amount of $5,000 for Christmas decorations. Total funds available for 1990 are $21,000. 9 0 PARKS a RECREATION a FORESTRY 900 Harrington Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 (612) 587 -2975 SENIOR CENTER CIVIC ARE 587 -6564 587 -4279 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Jay Beytien Christmas Lighting Committee, Chairman DATE: June 21, 1990 RE: Christmas Lighting Proposal The recommendations of the Christmas Lighting are as follows: a.) The Committee recommends purchasing decorations from Display Sales in the amount of $18,290. b.) The Committee recommends purchasing 36 sets of brackets from Zins Manufacturing at an approximate cost of $1,500. ($19,790) c.) The Committee recommends that. any balance remaining of the $21,000 earmarked for decorating purposes be spent by adding additional decorations in Library Square. (Approx. $1,210) This committee's decision to work with Display Sales is as follows. a.) Proven reliability. b.) On site direction for Park Department employees for refurbishing downtown decorations. c.) Superior quality sample products. d.) Six years full replacement warranty on decorations. e.) Five season banner replacement warranty. f.) Only company to include freight on bill. It has been a pleasure to serve as chairman of the Christmas Lighting Committee. I appreciate the opportunity to be involved in a lighting program which makes the City of Hutchinson unique. Is q-161 FINANCIAL INFORMATION Hutchinson, Minnesota Revised June 4, 1990 Deluxe Decorating Program This. Deluxe Decorating Program is a cost effective approach designed to erhance Hutchinson's decorating goals ana objectives. 24 - Sets of refurbishing garlanas for Skyline 1 - Set of refurbishing garlar.o for Happy Holiaays Sign 24 - Sets of Snap Hooks 1500 - Ties for Garlands 500 - Replacement Sockets 3500 - Replacement Lamps 36 - Post -Over Wreaths 48 ", unlighted Natural Silver Pine Garland, Branched Garlano with one 22" Rea Vinyl Bag 36 - Sets 16" x 45" Double Banners 36 - Sets brackets - PURCHASED LOCALLY 1 - 40' Seasons Greetings Sign - Red, lighted with Heavy Duty electrical. TOTAL DELUXE DEORATING PROGRAM Optional Pole Wrap 50 - 10/21 Rea Garland Pole Wrap 36 - 9/18 Red Garland Pole Wrap WE Pricing effective until December 31, 1990. u $15,965.00 Freight Preiaia $ 2,325.00 r V �luJ aces 6365 Carlson Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 r (612) 937 -5313 June 6, 1990 kr. Dolt Moon Director of Park & Recreation 900 Harrington Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Dolf: I want to thank you and the other members of your canmittee for accepting my proposal to serve your aecorating needs. Attached you will find the revised proposal showing all price increases and the silver pine wreaths. If you wish to deduct the Seasons Greetings sign you can deduct $1,375.00 from the order. Since I will be in Denver on June 26th, I can not make your council meetio but could cane out either June 22nd or the week of July 4th. Enclosed you will lino the artwork you can use to show the City Council your selection. If you would like to get the material prior to August 1st, I suggest that we finalize the details of the order on the 28th of June. If you have any questions, please call me toll free at; 1 -800- 328 -6195. Very truly yours, DISY $ALI.S, INC. `I.ynn'R. Smith President LRS:bjo 0 MINUTES Parks & Recreation Board March 28, 1990 Members Present: Roger Haggenmiller; chairman, Mike Schall, Linda Martin and Virgil Voigt. Also present were Dolf Moon and Karen McKay. The meeting was called to order at 5:23 p.m. The minutes dated January 31, 1990 were approved by a motion made by Mike Schall, and seconded by Linda Martin; the board unanimously agreed. Annual Report Questions -The board had no further questions, the report was thoroughly presented. Review Broch ire-The board felt the brochure was very informative, and the art work was attractive. Extra space in the brochure is limited; the Arts Guild is printing a separate flier and distributing it door to door. Mike Schall questioned the procedure for summer program registration. Dolf told the board that the staff will be trying to develop a plan that will help reduce the wait in the swimming registration lines. Request To Use Library Squ -Mhsic In The Park -The request to use Library Square for music in the park is the same as last year. Linda Martin made a motion to accept the request as written, Mike Schall seconded the motion; the beard agreed unanimously. Request To Use West River Park - Jaycees Basically there were no complaints or Problems with the arrangement of the Jaycee Water Carnival in West River Park last year. Virgil Voigt made a motion that the board accept the Jaycee's request to use West River Park for the Water Carnival. Mike Schall seconded the board motion, and the board unanimously agreed. Park Adop tion Pr000sal -Elks Club -Doff supplied the Elks Club with - the pacfis . Q• available for adoption and park improvements. They chose Orchard Park and are w budgeting $4,000 for a sun shelter similar to the one in Y.F.W. Park. Any t' money left over from the $4000 will be directed td picnic tables. The \, y , ece towards p' "• :' �EIk's have also budgeted $3,000 for the park in 1991 for a ballfield, backstop �\ and landscaping. Mike Schall dAdoption w J Proposal presented made a motion to accept the Park Ad ted by the Elks Club, Linda Martin seconded the moti on, and the' board agreed unanimously. This proposal will be forward to th e City Council. r V \ v\ �, !ar 1 c - U0_nation Prop - Jaycees -The Jaycees have proposed a donation for North Jaycee park of $500 plus frames for picnic tables. The $500 will be used to replace two garage doors in the shelter at the park. The city will provide the luaber, stain and hardware for the tables, and the Jaycees will assemble the tables. Linda Martin made a motion to accept the Jaycees proposal for improvements at North Jaycee Park. Mike Schall seconded the motion, and the board unanimously agreed. There is also money in the 1990 budget for the installation of sinks and a water heater in the shelter. RESOLUTION NO. 9289 RESOLUTION TO RENAME ORCHARD PARK TO ELKS PARK 0 WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has received financial donations from many fine institutions over the years; and WHEREAS, the Hutchinson Elk Club desires to donate $4,000 to build a picnic shelter in Orchard Park in the Year 1990. Ahl.Rh.4S, the HUIChInSon f:L;ea CLUh t.:.: pik 181.1 funr:a• :.atporl t,: 'I Orchard Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTC'HINSON, MINNESOTA: P that the Hutchinson City Cnuwil her,d:} r r.iz % :!mj al,I,r,., i�trr ;h support of the Hutchinson Elks Club and to recognize their efforts: renam,zs Orchard Park, corner of Century Avenue and Sherwood Street to Elks Dark. Adopted by the City Council this 26nd day of .June, 1990. Faul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: ----------------------------- Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 9 9 -� C pl f 4?iq�.. � U ,,1, K sc - (f m p� L E A U E W S I N P U B L I C F I N A N C E JLute 26, 1990 Mayor and City Council City of Hutchinson Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Sale date for Medical Fat_llity Bonds and Improvement-Bonds W. have been notified that Moody's Investors Service (the rating agency) has agreed to make a field visit on July 10, 1990 to Hutchinson. I believe the field visit to be extre -ely valuable in our effort to demonstrate the economic strength of the area and c Therefore w e recommend the sale date be moved from J uly 17, 1990 to July 24, 990 t accommodate Moody 's._ Mr. Gilligan suggests a S p a motlon action by the Co uncil is sufficient change c ent to the date. We have coordinated this change with all the parties to this transaction is pending your approval. Very truly yours, EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. William E. rahey Chief Executive Officer CC. Hutchinson Community Hospital, Frar-k Seivert Arnold & McDowell, G. Barry Anderson WEF:nel ZH UTCH -4 -6 0 is OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS ANC WAUKESHA 2950 Norwest Center. 90 South Seventh Sheet . %nneaao is, MN 55702 -4100 -572 -3 ?5.829' • FAX 612 -n9 -4°54 i �r i (672) 587.5151 f1UTCN CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, M1NN, 55350 MEMO June 2', 1990 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL ----------------------------------- FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR ----------------------------------- SUBJECT: 1990 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT We have received from the directors what cuts were possible in their 1990 budget. The total cuts presentee are $21,297. Prior to this the City Council has informally sa d they would be willing to use the fund balance. Our preliminary General Fund balance increased in 1989 by about $150,000 to a preliminary total of $1,131,690. The Minnesota Department of Revenue has not yet send official notice of the specific amount of Hutchinson's reduct-on. A preliminary estimate from the LMC is about $59,000 for Hutchirson and is what we are using in ou- analysis. Earlier a concern about worker's cdmoensation irsurance cost for 1990 has turned for the better. With a refund from prior years offsetting the increase in our ccst at renewal. I have attached the proposed budget cuts in summary form for your review. We will be at the meeting to review our 1990 budget. — s , 1 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1990 PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS JUNE 4, 1990 CEMETERY 4370 CONTRACT R & M CITY HALL 4210 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4370 CONTRACT R & M AIRPORT 4224 STREET MAINT MATERIALS 4320 TRAVEL SCHOOL & CONFERENCES ENGINEER 4120 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 4340 PRINTING & PUBLISHING MAINTENACNE TRAFFIC SIGNS 4220 R & M SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTS 4210 OPERATING SUPPLIES STORM SEWER 4220 R & M SUPPLIES PARKS 4530 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT TABLES PARK /REC DEPT 4530 ELECTRICAL WIRING POLICE 4120 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM 4311 POSTAGE 4320 TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCE 4340 PRINTING & PUBLISHING FIRE DEPARTMENT 4530 PER DETAIL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 4204 COPTY MACHINE 4370 CONTRACT R & M 4530 FILING CABINET TRANSIT CUT HOLIDAY SERVICE BUILDING INSPECTION ? 500 250 250 1,500 150 1,000 ? 1,000 ? 500 500 1,000 5,000 700 1,000 1,000 800 3,000 100 150 150 1,147 1,000 100 500 0 21,297 0 (612) 587 -5151 7lmul CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350 MEMO June 21, 1990 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL -------------------------------------------------------------- FROM: KEN MERRILL. FINANCE DIRECTOR ----------------------------- SUBJECT: 1991 BUDGET PREPARATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1991 Budget preparation and the time lines for the 1991 are being put into place. Truth in Taxation requirements are, we must have in place by Sept 1, 1990, the preliminary tax levy and budget. As last year the 1991 levy can not be increased but may oe . decreased. The public hearings will be scheduled by McLeod County Auditor Ed Ide. School dist -,cts will have the first choke with cities to follow. Final certification of tax levies and budget must be cem,leted by December 28, 1990. I have attached a copy of a LMC hand out which outlines the time lines. I will be at the City Council meeting to review how the Mayor and City Council would like to schedule the budget process this year. Because of the special session last year we did not have our budget review sessions until December. We anticipate the review will go much smoother this year and much earlier. • 1990 Truth in Taxation Timeline Requ rements fcr ALL Cities By: August 1 September 1 November 10 November - December n November 15 - December 20 December 28 Department o Revenue notifie notifies cities of LGA amounts and allowable levy for cities under levy limits Cities certify proposed levy and budget to county auuitor Citi -s select initial and continaati7n hearing dates Counties mail gereric notices of proposed prc taxes to all property of , ners, parcel - specific notices sent in Hennepin, Ramsey, and St. Louis Counties Cities publish newspaper ads of their proposed levy All taxing jurisdictions hold public hearings Cities certify final levies Cities certify compliance :vith truth in taxation requirements to Department of Revenue League of Minnesota Cities 5/90 J 9- G, $ Notice to ro ert owners of Spruce Count p P Y P Y 4 Proposed property tax to be II p p p y collected from property owners for 1991... Meetings you can attend to express your opinions on the proposed tax... Property Owner(s) John J. and Mary A. Johnson 123 Spruce Street Spruceville, Minnesota 55555 0 0 Your city council (if you live in a city), your county commissioners and your school board will hold hearings soon to decide on the amount of property taxes to collect in 1991 to pay for services they will provide in the upcoming budget year. The amounts shown on line 1 below are the total amounts of property tax which will be collected in 1991 if the budgets now being considered by your city, county, and school district are approved. Property Description Lot 1, Block 1 Spruce Acres Subdivision Spruceville, Minnesota Referendums, special assessments, legal judg- ments, natural disasters and revised population figures could result in an increase in the pro- Posed amounts shown on line 1. Your city council, county commissioners and school board members invite you to attend the hearings at the times and places shown be. low to express your opinions on the proposed amounts before they are voted on. County City of Spruce of Spruceville 1 Total tax proposed for 1991 $ 239,000 2 Total tax for 1990 $ 220,000 3 Change from 1990 to 1991 + 8.6 % 4 One -year population change + 2 % 5 Times and places of meetings 8 pm Nov 19 on proposed taxes Room 456 County Courthouse City Hall 6 Times and places of additional 8 pm Nov 20 meetings if necessary same place 7 Where to send comments Mayor's Office and /or get a copy of the pro. 321 Spruce Street posed budget Spruceville, MN 55555 County School District 99 of Spruce Spruceville /Oakville $ 464,000 $ 320,000 $ 450,000 $ 290,000 + 3.1 % + 10.39 + 2% + 1.5 % pupil units 7:30 pm Nov 26 7 pm Dec 3 Room 123 Cafeteria County Courthouse High School 7:30 pm Nov 27 7 pm Dec 4 same place same place Spruce County Board School Superintendent 123 Spruce Street 456 Spruce Street Spruceville, MN 55555 Spruceville, MN 55555 9- G, RESOLUTION NO. 9283 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 262 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of T.N. 15 (Main Street) from T.H. 7 to the North City Limits by the Construction and Reconstruction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Service Connections and Appurtenances in Conjunction with Minnesota Department of Transportation Reconstruction of T.H. 15, and the bid price for such improvement is $ 185,309.47, and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $35,208.80, so that the total cost of the improvement will be $220,518.27. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $171,567.60, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefitted property owners is declared to be $48,950.67. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over period of 10 years, the first of the instal iments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 1991, and shall bear interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION ND. 9284 RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 262 • LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 90-15 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 11th day of June, 1990, the City Administrator was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the improvement of T.H. 15 ( Main Street) from T.H. 7 to the North City Limits by the Construction and Reconstruction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Service Connections and Appurtenances in Conjunction with Minnesota Department of Transportation Reconstruction of T.H. 15. AND WHEREAS, the City Administrator has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. A hearing shall be held on the 1Dth day of July, 1990 in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is Paid October 1st, 1990. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or Interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 26th day of June, 1990. ayor City Administrator a (612) 587 -5151 Hvrcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON p. 37 WASHING TON A VENUE WES T z`�✓''� HUTCHlNSON MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 19, 1990 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY NORM PONSFORD TO 140VE A MANUFACTURED HOME Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On March 19, 1990, Mr. Norm Ponsford, Hutchinson, submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to move a 24' x 48' manufactured home unto property located at 420 School Rd. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 17, 1990 at which time there were neighboring property owners present who objected to the request. The public hearing was continued until further criteria could be maintained. The final public hearing was held on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, at which time there were neighboring property owners present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 5, 1990. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION Due to a split vote, Building Official Jim Harka called for a roll call vote: Tom Lyke voted to approve, Chairman Bill Craig voted to deny, E1Roy Dobratz voted to approve and Clint Gruett voted to deny. The Planning Commission has no recommendation for the City Council due to the tie vote. Respectfully submitted, Bill Craig, Chairman 1 K (612) 587.5151 C/T Y OF HUTCAMNSON 37 WAS.= i,NGTON AVE,%11E WEST HUTCH;NSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 20, 1990 TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney FRO14: Jim Marka, Building Official SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - NOR14 PONSFORD The denied recommendation of the split decision vote of Public Hearing Item # 3 (a) at the June 19, 1990 Planning Commission meeting is based on Section 6.07 A.2. of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance. The two negative votes and the immediate 2 abutting neighbors felt the proposed home would create adverse affects on property values as proposed. The major concern was the unattached garage, roof lines, small combination windows and lack of architectural character as Presently exist within the neighborhood. JM /bb cc: Mayor and City Council'' J r; (612) 587.5151 1/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN 55350 M E M 0 DATE: May 17th, 1990 TO: Planning Staff Planning Commission G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney Mayor and City Council FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official RE: Ponsford's Home - Relocate Mfg. Home from Country Club Terrace to 420 School Road South In regard to the proposed Conditional Use Permit to place a manufactured home at 420 School Road South, it appears that all D.A.P.I.A. requirements and H.D.D. requirements can be complied with. Please note that I have reviewed and confirmed the dreument with Mr. Randy Vogt, from the State of Minnesota Building Code Division - Manufactured Housing. The Planning Commission was equally split (one absence) in their consideration of "Neighborhood Continuity ". Due to the neighborhood opposition and controversy, I have consulted with Barry Anderson, City Attorney, who assured me he would review the relevant statutes on this subject matter. For your reference, I am attaching page 25 of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance. I speculate that the criteria level of Section 6.01, 2, (a), (b) A (c) will be topics for discussion. �ru.3 L James G. Marks Building Official JC_i /pv attachment - 0 regulations applicable to the district in which it is to be located; (b) Planned development in accordance with the provisions of >� Section 8.09 of this Ordinance in any district; and (c) Any of the following uses in any residential or commercial district: (1) Hospitals, clinics and medical office buildings when such buildings are located on a lot having an entire front, rear or side lot line adjoining, or across a municipal street from, a lot or tract of land on which a hospital is located; provided the external appearance of such hospitals, clinics and medical office buildings shall be compatible in character, appearance and design with that of other uses in the area. (2) Day care, education, religious, philanthropic or charitable institutions. (3) Community recreational buildings and field. (d) Any of the following uses in any district: 6,01 (1) Public buildings to be used by the City, Township, County, State or Federal governments. (2) Buildings, facilities or premises of public service corporations to be used for public utility purposes reasonably necessary to the public convenience or welfare. 2. A conditional use permit for the uses listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance shall be granted only if evidence is presented to establish: P (a) That the proposed building or use at the particular location requested is necessary or desireable to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest the Public convenience and will contribute o e general wel are o e neighborhood or community; (b) Tha the proposed buildin o r use will not have a sub �antial or un ue adverse effect upon adiacent N , UNCI Ly, Lne characTer the neighborhood traffic condi uti i n o her matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare; and (c) That the proposed building or use will be designed, arranged, and operated so as to permit the development and use of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable district regulations. 25 t' PAY * , •`n om ..:. _ _ _ . f.l , a W.4 .. _ ' s � • o � .1L''. 9 let S � t ti j 9 -1 :7A 1:: 1 c,H ruK MH. AND MRS NORM PONSFORD LOT 1, BLOCK I. MCDONALD'S SECOND ADDITION I I Ears ring nose ROBERTS ROAD t • 1 0 O 0 • 9039 Ntarcl 14, 1990 C 15 3 6.: V S89 +I — - — 102.88 r � � o I !I +� `" L I it D ° vJc Lu o Eaisrinq co !I V nose O` o - w O Z N N Nit o a (p ed) d Z ii I Q 24 N II 24 N' 30 !i o I 4 rq I I n -- l 100.00 S89 ° 3I "E ROBERTS ROAD t • 1 0 O 0 • 9039 Ntarcl 14, 1990 C 15 3 6.: ",+X.v— i � l l� J I CL CLC.LLL_ LL E_ rl1 CLnU-. CL / :_�. G�t't J sir-4 nr s Ck- �n Qi1Zr� -R� orrnsz , U cl_ b. ct-t. A- /� �'c�.e,i ` 4 h, nfc L Lt- r J c � cis Y /Lj j- r e v ° / .L ���. � / ^ • ^t ��L ��... }:�L.)1� ;r (612) 587 -5151 yaTCH' CITY OF HUTCHIPJSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 20, 1990 T0: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERI4IT REQUESTED BY BOB HALL FOR GARAGE ADDITION AT 345 MONROE Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its'•findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On May 17, 1990, Mr. Bob Hall, Hutchinson, submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him to construct a garage addition to a nonconforming home located at 345 Monroe St. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 19, 1990 at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 7, 1990. 3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as set forth above. Respectfully submitted, �.I William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 9- s A RE D E LA) L k -- j Opo�osEp G�M1kAs�' �r - -� CX i 5 7 ' +wG Ml c DRIVE WAY IY� WIDE ZN moo �o 0 e s 0 i � f t RESOLUTION NO. 9287 RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION LOCATED AT 345 MONROE ST. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Mr. Bob Hall, 345 Monroe, has made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 at allow him to construct a garage addition to a nonconforming home located at 345 Monroe St. with the following legal description: Lot six (6) in Block Thirty -seven (37) Townsite of Hutchinson, South Half, according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, McLeod County, Minnesota. Subject to easements, restrictions and covenants of record, if any. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of June, 1990. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor / - T V (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINS0N 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M O R A N D U H DATE: June 20, 1990 TOc Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY VERN BRELJIE TO REDUCE FRONTYARD SETBACK AT 922 HASSAN Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinane No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a variance. HISTORY On May 31, 1990, Mr. Vern Breljie submitted an application for a . variance to allow him to reduce the front yard setback from 25' to 18' for construction of roof over deck loacted at 922 Hassan. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, at which time there was no one present who objected to the request. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 7, 1990. RECOMMENDATION It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the variance be denied due to lack of hardship. Respectfully submitted, William Craig, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 9� ,. tt . -. � tx "�. Sx Y V 1.� h � A � �, `:'.n'U 11;.N3yJ d,4 4 . :....(' -Mr11' Y - �� ! y � d »t � � ��t �..'. wt. 1- ,1,.y' •� +a:Als - . V../. tlyE.w: wry.! #�M41 I.WS.�i'N1F. l 4 +T�fL ��.�•ii.. �Mx/�Y�GL�Y::rr4WiW,.e. t,aw4O�lA .u4 .Id.N. }.!�,h .�.. ..�V�( • ++��PW��hh M1 / b \ b} • b N` /o. u L 6 4. 8 pni C" / w 3 -o j {�oo� a M ks 6ay °9 c 6l Top / 1 Y/ 4 \ / / / � I <' OFSt ? /Pr /v.v tP� I/orrcf.vso Suao�Y�J /aR /. �A \ v ` ,,3 4 Oenefrs esrvF,ny e/PVe1, �5 Dene /rJ/JrePaied a %roe •` Np rf : Ads /poa.00 /. o / /t/ y '� u] o b`�f V• Bend, Mon(: Tpo a /- Cu 4 (n o/ Nf Le1 Carne. -25 b�s � \ � DenafPS dra:no9Pdie 5 A Ii V �L \- / �•sr / ' WA. .IB 1� a Oenafes Aron Monument II e McCOM95KNUT50N A550[IATES INC. i ...... ...... .... o1Hn /pd H � 49 w .... s ' w .[f.'4 d � y, `°��w� !^'.'�e >ya. :+ >,c ryr:... � • 1 [ .. y' ... y c n::;ft M.�:; _ ..ir „. 4 n•'•.� .+r....w r. 'ww�sn n .t. _: , .._�_. +..... ,rte.: .. .. r .... ��. y l • i u l - v I i . :.. A �'�.�� `y .+.r.r�..1 Y•r u . A._:..�.'� , ..n, , ,.� r � `Tx Imo •mot �. _ '{' I /.� Mi J ./ 1 • i I ' 1 1 ` ��I � Y 'tea �•• � 6...}. � , C ``x R f t ; .. ' z _! s I i r r - .. .Y', TIFF.{+ � 1 'i � .. 1 .. �, 4' I J��t T.�•` ` R-.. r • � f. 1 ♦ t' F 3 �: R _ . 1�T r I ♦ �ti,b ♦ 12 � F S�� APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM N� MAY 1930 �p PROVISIONS OF ZONING ORDINANCE PA p ,� City of Hutchinson, Minnesota ,, PAID _ ��5� SUBMITTED DEADLINE: On or before the last working day of the month (including sca a map s . 1. ' NName of Property Owner: y4- /RNa /i '/. tt 2. Address of Property Own Date Filed: 70 Te ephone N0e41.9).5—,F7-4a6 EAni 2/ 701z- 4/7—E 9a z ffRSSrgA' J. Street Address of Property Invo ved: 5 1 a ;�' /7 SS Acv sZ� . / Ila 1. Present use: 5. Proposed use: 6. Date Property �O/�7 OHi !_ Acquired: W449. / rrraenL coning uistn ct: _ a. variance is request frdfi the fol of wing Section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance: _ -� 9 o 3 1P What is the regiirement of the Section (s) mention in Item 8? 10. What is the minimum reduction in the requirements of the Zoning Or inance (� which would permit the proposed use or construction? Posen �f 0N� ya2�� S�r3Ac K d -y ' 7 U44 Cv NOTE. A scale map survey is required to accompany t is application. The map should include the building site (lots), existing building, planned new building(s), or addition(s), existing and proposed setbacks, street names and alleys, and N/S direction. City staff reserves the discretion to request a survey and delay the ublic hearing one month if the maps are insufficient. 11. State exactly x at is nten a to be one on or wit the property which does not conform with existing regulations? grante Explain in detail each statement. ic. unique circumstances of Lot: at are special conditions narrowness, s a owness, or s ape of a Tot, exceptional topographic or water conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional conditions of such lot) applying to the structure or land in question that are peculiar to the property involved or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located? 13. Undue Hardship: Describe the specific hardship(s) you claim: • Please Note: Inconvenience of the andowner or occupant, se f-created situations (inc udin� g purchase of property), age and /or health problems are not deemed hardship under Minnesota case law. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under the ordinance (MN Statutes 462.357.) The statutory test is that the property owner cannot put the property to reasonable use under existing controls, the unique circumstances must exist and if the request is granted the essential character (land -use) of the locality is not changed.( MN Statutes 462.357.) If you have difficulty in determining the above hardship, consider alternatives to your construction plan. Possibly you may not need this variance. 14. Effect on Nei hborhood: Do you feel the granting of the variance impairs an a equate supp y of ight and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increases the congestion in the public streets, increases the danger of fire, endangers the public safety, unreasonably diminishes or impairs established property values in the surrounding area, or in any way impairs health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any respect is contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance? Yes NO • Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned hereby represents upon all of the penalties of law, or the purpose of inducing the City of Hutchinson to take the action herein requested, that all statements herein are true and that all work herein mentioned will be done in accordance with the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota. 16. Is this property abstract or torrens? o Le al property owner si nature required: Date: To be completed by staff: Property Identification No. " o 9-K! n __/ -<'�~ J ` ' � • _ -� L,. v' 7 r�f r �// �r.v�.9( _l t tl J�� (6 1 2) 879-2; 1 CITY OF HUTCH /NSON 37 WASH/NGTO.N AVENUE WEST HUTCHl.NSON'. MINN 55350 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 18, 1983 T Hutchinson City Council _ FROST: Planning Commission SUB.TECT: Variance (s) requests) submitted by Ancher Nelsen F Cliff Popp Pursuant to Section 6.05, B. 3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its finding of fact and recommend- ation with respect to the aforementioned request(s) for variance (s). HISTORY on April 15, 1983, an application was submitted by Mr. Ancher Nelsen and Mr. Cliff Popp requesting a variance to allow the reduction of the sideline setback from 25' to 21 a variance to allow the reduction of the rearline setback from 25 to 6' and a variance to allow the reduction of the frontline setback from 25' to 20 on the property located at the corner of Oakland Avenue and Hassa: Street. The construction of a duplex is planned for the lot. A Public hearing was held on May 17, 1983. Staff noted that a problem existed with the parking requirements for the proposed duplex. 2 parking spaces for each side of the structure are required. A single car garage for each side is Planned which means a parking space is required on the front driveway. Parking cannot be in the front 15' and another variance and hearing would be required. The setbacks as requested to the north and south conform to neighbor - hodd and present no problem to the area. FINDINGS OF FACT I. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 5, 1983. 3. It was felt by the staff that the setbacks requested would conform to what already- exists in the neighborhood and would not cause any hardship to the area. 0 Findings of Fact Variance Requests - Ancher Nelsen $ Cliff Popp . May 18, 1983 RECOM1� ON It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the variances as requested. Vote: Mr. Nelsen and Mr. Popp were directed to either change the design of the building to conform to parking requirements as well as setbacks as approved, or apply for another variance to allow the parking as now planned. Respectfull��jbmitted, ROMO, Chairman nson Planning Commission AvE � 1 06 S j �'Z RESOLUTION NO. 7398 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES) FROM SECTION 6.05 B.3 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE N0. 464 TO ALLOW REDUCTION OF SIDELINE SETBACK, REARLINE SETBACK AND FRONTLINE SETBACK BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FFJTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: FINDINGS t. Mr. Ancher Nelsen and Mr. Cliff Popp of Hutchinson, Minnesota have applied for a variance from Section 6.05, B.3 of the Zoning Ordinance No. 464 for variance(s) to allow the reduction of the sideline setback from 25 feet to 21 feet, the reduction of the rearline setback from 25 feet to 6 feet and the reduction of the frontline setback from 25 feet to 20 feet, on the property located at the corner of Oakland Avenue and Hassan Street, with the following legal description: Lot 16 and the East 4 feet of Lot 15 in Block 3 of Selchow- Jorgenson Subdivision 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the application be granted. r 3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the Proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan. 4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safetyp unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The special conditions applying to th structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located. 6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. CONCLUSION 0 The application for variance(s) for the purpose designated is granted based upon the findings set forth above. RESOLUTION NO. 7398 PACE 2 11 L Adopted by the City Council t ATTEST: Gar Plo 2 City Clerk 0 " /(E 72) 879-2:111 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 v ^:A$ ',NCi J AVENUE V L$7 NTENJ 0RANDI1M D,1TC: M ay S. 1953 T[1: FROM SUR.IECT LJ Hutchinson Planning Commission _Planning_ Commission Staff _Variance (s) - _requested by Ancher Nelsen and Cliff Popp Staff recommends approval of the variances to the North and South. Staff recommends approval of the variance to the East contingent upon the redesign of the garage to allow for 2 car parking inside each side of the structure. 2 parking spaces are required by City Ordinance. g �! �/ � (612)587-5757 ti rHUT rH,7 CITY 0, HUp , G,, 5' t /rSNr�C'ON � ('c Vv'cS7 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 20, 1990 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY RECYCLING SITE COLLECTION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council hold off on the enforcement of the present ordinance up to 60 days to allow staff time to draft an ordinance to apply to temporary recycling centers. U 9 -,,, J (612) 537 -5151 _ 7. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 20, 1990 T0; Planning Staff FROM: Jim Marka, Building Official 6LB STANDARDS FOR TEMPORARY LOCATION RECYCLABLE MATERIAL COLLECTION SITES At the June 1�, 1990, Planning Commission meeting the Planning Commission directed m._ to draft an ordinance similar to Mankato's which permits recycling collection activities of portable units within the IC -1, I -2, C -3 and C -4 Zoning Districts. i My recommendation is to control this activity through licensing sir:ilar to peddler type licensing with the appropriate fees to cover administrative costs. The following is my recommendation: Standards for Temporary Location Recyclable Material Collection, Permi -ted Within I -1, IC -1, C -3 and C -4 Zoning Districts A. Collection activities shall be allowed per each location no more frequently than one (1) day per week. B. Hours on a site shall bi no earlier than 8:00 a.m. nor later than 8:00 p.m. C. Collection activity equipment shall consist of no more than one (1) vehicle to haul the collected material and a scale to weight material if needed. No shredding of material shall occur at the collection site. The only piece of equipment that may be outside of a vehicle is a scale, NO stockpiling is permitted. D. In the case of aluminum collection, a metal separator and compactor may be used if such equipment is tctally contained within the collection vehicle. E. Location of a collection vehicle on a site shall not impede access to the site, hinder normal vehicular flea on such site or use excessive parking area provided on such site for required customer parking. ff 612) 587.5151 - TY OF HUT CHINSON ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HINSON, MINN. 55350 June 13th, 1990 Hr. Jeff Schauer Rt. 2, Box 202 Winthrop, MN 55396 Dear Hr. Schauer: This letter is tc inform you that your recycling c,,cration is presently being operated within a Land Use Zoning District (Commercial 4) which presently does not permit such The Hutchinson City Council and Planning Commission are presently in the process of revising our existing Zoning Ordinance, which ry conditionally permit mobile recycling activities within C -4 Districts. It is our objective to complete this document by September 1, 1990. Until adoption of Hutchinson's Revised Zoning Ordinance you are restricted to operation only within the Industrial I -1 and Industrial /Commercial Districts IC -1, both of which require a Conditional Use Permit, screening, etc. Your cooperation of innadiate co:iliance is appreciated and required. I encourage you to contact the Hutchinson Building Department for review of conditionally approved Zoning Districts and regulation information. Best regards, CI OF HUTCHI j6RN ,1 maklo-if Jame G. MaYka'� Building Official JGM /pv cc: T.E.R., Tim Rrasen C. Barry Anderson, City Attorney Mark Hensen, Asst. Bldg. Insp. Planning Commission / Planning Stafff Mayor and City Council Bill Bakken, Farm 6 Home Dist. D S J Enterprises, Doug Yerks Hutchinson Iron b Metal, Jay Freedland ® (612)587-5757 C/TY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350 June 13th, 1990 Mr. Jim Henning Rt. 2, Box 62 Cokato, MN 55321 Dear Mr. Henning: This letter is to inform you that your recycling operation is presently being operated within a Land Use Zoning District (Commercial 4) which presently does not permit such The Hutchinson City Council and Planning Commission are presently in the process of revising our existing Zoning Ordinance, which may conditionally permit mobile recycling activities within C -4 District:.. It is our objective to complete this document by September 1, 1990. Until adoption of Hutchin on's Revised Zoning Ordinance you are restricted to operation only within the Industrial I -1 and Industrial /Commercial Districts IC -1, both of which require a Conditional Use Permit, screening, etc. Your cooperation of immeCiate compliance is appreciated and required. I encourage you to contact the Hutchinson Building Department for review of conditionally approved Zoning Districts and regulation information. Best regards, CI OF J s G. Hazka 7 Building Official JGM /pv cc: T.E.R., Tin Rrasen G. Barry An62rson, City Attorney Mark Hensen, Asst. Bldg. Insp. 'Planning Commission /Planning Staff Mayor and City Council Bill Bakken, Farm 6 Home Dist. D S J Enterprises, Doug Yerks Hutchinson Iron & Metal, Jay Freedland 0 sw ` (612) 587.5151 CITY OF KUTCiVINSON b' 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 M E M 0 DATE: June 4th, 1990 TO: C. Barry Anderson, City Attorney -- Planning Co- ffiission Mayor and City Council FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official 1�pl\ RE: Zoning Regulatio:s - Temporary Site for Recyclable Material Collection As requested by Earry Anderson, I have received from both New Ulm and Mankato, a copy of their recently adopted ordinances regulating "Temporary Location for Recyclable Material Collection ". It appears that both cities "conditionally permit" such land usage in "business" type districts which are similar to Hutchinson's C -3 and C-4 districts. At this point, I recommend the Planning Commission address this issue at the June 19th meeting and we incorporate the desired appropriate language into our Zoning Ordinance, which is presently being revised. JCM /pv attachments cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator J. Freedland Bill Weber, BRW 0 q -)' 9 —Ln parking space for each three (3) eigtoyees, plus one space for the owner or manager, and in addition, reservoir parking spaces ' . equat in number to five (5) times the maximum Capacity of the automobile laundry - for automobiles awaiting entrance to the automobile laundry shalt be provided. Maximum Capacity, in this instance, shall mean the greatest ember possible of automobiles undergoing some phase of laundering at the same time. E. All other uses; in accordance with the ptanning requirements section of the Zoning Chapter of the city. F. Off- street perking spaces are provided on surface lots or in parking structures; provided, that alt surface parking areas shall be effectively separated from abutting residential development by ornamental fencing and/or screen planting to be not less than six (6) feet in height. " V G. All off - street parking spaces for all uses .,� y shall be located on the same zoning lot as the use for which . such parking is required or within three hundred (300) feet 1}— walking distance thereof. S bd. 19. Standards for Temporary Location Recycleabte Naterial Collection. r,.\ _4 1 A. Collection activities shalt be allowed per each location no more frequently than one (1) day within a two -week period. - t✓ B. Hour on a site shall be no earlier than 10:00 ��r, / \ a.m. nor later then 5:00 p.m. C. Collection activity equipment shalt consist of no more than a* (1) vehicle to .haul the collected material and a scale to weight material if needed. No shredding of material shall occur at the collection site. The only piece of equipment that may be outside of a vehicle is a scate. D. In the case of aluminum collection, a metal separator and compactor my be used if such equipment is totally contained within the collection vehicle. E. Location of a collection vehicle an a site shalt not ispede access to the site, hinder normal vehicular flow on such site or use excessive parking area provided on such site for required customer parking. F. Location of a collection vehicle an s site _ shall not be within two hundred (200) feet of an adjacent ' commercial facility or three hundred (300) feet of a residence. �— a. All garbage and debris out be cleaned from the area in which the collection activity was located prior to leaving the location. M. vehicles used in any collection activity shall Stpp. No. 34 266.1 9 —Ln be kept in a neat and clean manner. 1. Any signs promoting the recycling activity at the collection location shall be attached to the collection vehicle. J. A schedule of dates for a one -year period shall be submitted with each applicant's request and be resubmitted each succeeding January 1st. (Ord. of 4- 25 -84) Subd. 20. Minimum standards for light manufacturing and assembly development of light manufacturing activities in the General Carmercial District shall comply with the following standards: A. There shall be no storage of materials outside of an enclosed building. B. Such use shdll comply, with the minimum lot size and setback requirements stated in the 1-1 Planned Industrial District. - - C. Such use shall comply with the performance ., -. standards stated in Section 10.17, Subd. 18.. (Ord. of 4- 11 -88) -- Sec.- 10.17.•t1- 1 )Flary Udxtria( :District :r Subd. 1. Purpose. The planned irdustria( district is established to provide exemplary standards of development for certain irk atrial uses that prefer to be located In choice or strategic sites. With proper control, these areas should became compatible with higher quality commercial or residential area. Subd. 2. Special requirements. Mona. Subd. 3. Permitted uses. The following are permitted uses. A. Art equipment supplies, manufacture. B. Automobile service station. C. Bags, boxes and paper containers, manufacturing and storage. D. Bakery products. . E. Bottling establishments. •' , -• - :': F. Blank books, looseleaf birders, fabrication �� -- and asse. G. Books and bookbinding. Supp. No. 34 266.2 9�, ORDINANCE NO. 90 - 66 , Second Series CITY OF NEW ULM, BROWN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.10 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW ULM TO PERMIT THE CONDITIONAL USE OF THE B -2 ZONING DISTRICT FOR COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW ULM: SECTION I. That Section 9.10, Subd. 3 of the City Code of the City of New Ulm be amended to read as follows: SECTION 9.10. B -2 SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT. Subd. 3. Uses by Conditional Use Permit. Within a B -2 Service Business District, no building or land shall be used for one or more of the following uses except by conditional use permit: A. Other business activities of the same general character as listed in Subdivision 2 of this Section. B. A collection center for the acceptance of recyclable materials and household items. Provided, however, that any such conditional use permit shall be renewed annually and may contain such restrictions on the method and nature of the operation of such center as are deemed necessary to preserve and protect public health, safety and comfort. Such restrictions may include, without limitation, specifications for hours of operation, screening, staffing, removal of collected materials, and collection of hazardous or dangerous materials. SECTION II. This ordinance shall be in force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage, approval and publication. Passed by the City Council of the City of New Ulm, this 6th day of March , 1990. President off h Oity Council ATTEST: City Clerk- Treasurer Approved by the Mayor of the City of New Ulm this 6th day of _ N 2rch 1990. 6 C E 0 9 -� (612) 637 -5151 CITY Oh'- HUTCM11 3,' VJHS 'vGTOP' A' cPJUE WEST / • If E td 0 R A N D U M DATE: June 20, 1990 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATIOi OF LOT SPLIT IN YWOODVIEP! ACRES REQUESTED BY ROXANNE KOKESH (2 14ILE RADIUS) The Planning Commission recommends approval of the lot split to City Council with no obje A 9 M, 0 Cwca e MCLECD CCUNTY Zoning Administrator 8 30 1 In Street East • Court House GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336.2270 Phone 864 -5551 Ext 259 EDWIN E. HCMAN Admsn,seaca MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Hutchinson Edwin E. Homan;�KcLeod County Zoning Administrator June 13, 1990 Replat of Lot 6, Block 1, Wood View Acres Sketch Plan Section 25, Acoma Towr ship. It is the administrative policy of this office to re any sketch plans within two (2) miles of a municipality to the appropriate city council and planning commission. The city of Hutchinson shall review the sketch plan and transmit written comments of that review to the Planning Commission. Failure to submit such a report within thirty (30) days shall constitute approval of the sketch plan. Information regarding this sketch plan is enclosed for your review. Please note that there are two different plans for this replat. The Replat of Lot 6, Block 1, Wood View Acres sketch plan (submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Kokesch) is tentatively scheduled for review by the Planning Commission on Wednesday, June 27, 1990, at 10:00 a.m. in the County Commissioners' Room, Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota. EEH /las Enclosure 9 -M, VCL'_0. C,,,nll i5 an E:1 al Ccccr ,naP = T- G0v?;; 1;'iura §',o SCI Co ACOMA TOWNSHIP II NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST YEEKEa co © , pG0 I:1:0 1R ir♦ q°• ff -r CR r CRN ♦GV�6T Lyp I • RUT a Fq ED E': LRE •<w e w • •• v ^ BELLE LA[E ^•,[. •�'• W'W LL jv fP p[er �.o - Q!5 �MIET 't l!ARTMRt C E.`AR • SIr ' - '• r •• 7 ''ALL11 Y rl NAW cm RADINEt C. ^, LANE J N•I A ' t - w tj' xM i iR17N[rN 4KR 22) 41 1 "L gl� � � MOw !^ u a <i`i j �\ I r C Nf GEDf2 J sts D p _:., • . -� ��� I(-�t% i -- �_!' c rl Ir • wa.� +. AFQTC ' „ -F: I �•ti'L�•. , ;•;t1. i /S° J�ii+2'! . w J ® .. N.a1 1- .L' wf �,f..f .F:•9,F'la. 95 T9 F R? i • 1 i f 191 / ti I .c :v �] r.. .•a • yyy //� .q �RiuJllJr C [. °.I'!•fa.l ; 'L«N' A�7 -/ /(J `� K•ICCRf p !2) a” R F�[M« •� R 6LD V .� a pJr[j fELL41 a - F bg Y• eF R FAIR . r[•... 6.' "L UUCP - " usZI •> q fi E •a0 I� le: : ' . R NLa .x • 1 f> �P 1 I'�'1�1 e•� I O •/ •J •.1 r1. f S10F'NG 4Gn r' T a't , U - r1174E WFR NGS7 • x I r +.— rr: ' xaL-Ea fI rA ICE e 0 Q MY [D ' LUIS ]f iLaYGM - R1MI LQEkE 11 • ,� .ART 1•t•[i r L d • up • 1'[ _ 1% , ;.: ♦ ^CL rJi FI IMflii i• �• H „10< NA$$ 1/••e1 1L1 8 F .fM rN R✓'tfTi �, I •[ [ ° ) f ELR /� ` �.. II], Le ` •�-1 I OrTO I L Ti NCFF ia..+. 26iQ r, u•[ — �- co NpL TT:e7 j5 MW Irr l• »W. I Y,.TwTr� / xf•flfs tl [wr I q• 'sa EST. I f a. 'AD a �DI-DT 9_•ahN vTll �CNMIE I MGT 6NFE ' �•�_I�� I I�f 1 [fr 1 { N,Ola� 1 RIEO SEEDS r 1 n -Lw v« e I fuel' Q r I,IERREL:s LAKE `lpafl•.. G. MON 1ARE AL (+� a ONN Fa �:( LN[N� 0.tr r KDHLS G C ^.•' ! fu. li 6 - eor[' aLi• c R o TEWS EIRE E l+` I r '� IA �f JImMIS ETAL a EiLER ' :ii : , iQewnrm •o :.. a ♦ 1 � , i� E:Ep` � - b t L rl 0= 12 9J ;r .[•L �• O y.• •d• 'YV7J, a.... � ss S� _ VIR6L yM�e L•f Kn . f a -d • •.n TGL a = FGeAN RT - • r] -� YNG Y I ° NELl� g R I I FoxN! 1 E.•� IA� « f IRC9M,TCN7 1 V SEY[E �`� • L wl Lap �°"••'I I IFS -J GGNE7 W e I FF E'aLL 1O r •F[ .r 1 JjT RI OE�fCN COI Daft ° BASEY AR ElOQ N' , IRENE Vlflrf 1 ' p.f -• nfa.f \A I RIF .sK S I ERICKSON 1 lt AOEYY W`^41.55 1 Fy ENE f �• IED L SaL • TER IeQI 1 +J� GI Uc0 E.RLIN� [•��+F•t,/ a<e fEwS f I r Mm ���.../// wattlI G • N *: • o •• [° I LfV�'•. bt I TM RILG&l arwNwi ELlIE t I %Ei =:cc• �:+ fr[NnFri'7 - q v l I r 'V4N5 a � C f IfI }b� J Y i �SCw[ut'•f U9 a r.•Illb fN•�1� !KK3J Ia MARTIN \ 23 TDIA '1 t� • R i F VCf OT•J • AEK7 P• a , iuNw ® 4 . ® - FEM 8 ,. Iz 9.Rr*sr¢ �� \L� �•6 NARCLD H . SH CR rIMEgA • L + i[w4 6LENx a FFRN e. GRIE "UNNACN SHE NQCQ ,JJ E TEWS IIIQII ) i�W ♦' 3 �1� oYA•r� .�• CuxYER 9 a :� I}A(XTEw7. fr !` GERT4 j • !`� Q ' I �f �a R.VED y� ,R� IZOLARt,e3 RADUN2 itf�L • IN [D• , Ern 9 w l ••�, [a a • 5 i IfE1ERxE.WNf KRNa t •• A YORYGNN ( • EUGENE wAR N• R[ I +°eLTt CON4 r EST Y � 1 DEITY ;N QRT2 �n BEND •f •' �i a ryf•r V f � �24L:S Z.i7 � :ics +u.E LFaED L. I pE r AGMU1s ' e ' f I ,/1 tVE �YRaR eoeoj �9�Y TI I CEYMW6 DID RO DWIN JIM ON[ 6 iwra s \ tiurN€MS , O wE7L•r a s f of• � -. E• ' \ . ^? E`KEC GREY R7rJAMlr6 ��.TTTfffffT I �� uaf o..i. 1 � .� '' • q(ZYM- ' I O)• MINA 2 4 1RI E VE j DELMER F+M �f •� \. VER rNry STURGE7 I �a C • IYN 1 � R �\•\� i. NANN I �y 1 TT Ee r L = �urdEa, aT �� ERTNA �Ce .wµLp]RL T L ^ 1�!•. C J _ m2•0 '[1W lCN D I• LINN IIIGC 71 TWR SMALL TRACT OWNERS _I 9C �r �r• K-1 III wCl FwC N \[ tlL f[r I•Yr K.L IR btr }r[ —. I n. � r , c•'•_ • • r. w_Y O. n«•LM r IM f �_ K.r C__•fI�N_ •i : , L •�ti Yw• •� r) w C 4 •F.r �• r.• V.CM i : •~•:.. sir • w.`n `a � lr : �• 'T _•, _ ,� Z N 1 �aSr las sumed Dearing _. 1585. BO 193.00 193.00 193.00 —._ —__ I S !n 2 p T d '^ 00 iv z oaa.waee e�se.,e.r d O n d p t O 0 z BLOCK DRIVE 280.00 r 33133 i 2U1 0I O I n \ n� 3 3 ro �fo I 0 / 1 N r I n \ n� 3 3 \ \ �fo I 4. s � rf 3 9.1 3 , 0 6\ OQ. 1 C.jLj•J �10 O- (r L I_ Mrs ore Shown thus- 4.3x55,58 "•�" z O0. 200_00 I 5 3 6 O IN I i East O ^ O i I K � 1 I O O O W W O Y I O O n j I p.n N N I U 2 v) N O . n0 1.0 wi 0 I ry � 00.00 _I $ I fast I 0 N 7 J d N 0 0 s� i 0 J 10.01 84 q8 4` /S• n \ n� 3 3 \ \ I 4. s � rf 3 9.1 3 , 0 6\ OQ. O- (r Mrs ore Shown thus- 4.3x55,58 "•�" z O0. West O W 200.00 Ory We;r �n �O O F Y —LANE - 522.0 _ I lit th S nun line STi co �J APO We cou wo1 A00 Acv the We Min No The DeOnny or the norm line of me NW I/4 Is 05 sumed In novr 0 Dronn9 of East. Onr h, nr ^ ^me iro .r.rn nv IG inrn rrnn mnnnmanl sartad by �ren<r No 9f 7fi rn1• 0 REVISED PRELI`1 PLAT "'wood View acres" Section 25, Ac--ma Township Dennis K. Albertson /Richard Larson APPROVED: Planning Commission 3/30/83 County Board 5/3/83 1. Access to Lots 1 -5 of Block 1 shall be from Ti=ber Lane. ! 2. Access to Lots 1 -3 of Block 2 shall be from Wood Lane. 3. A front yard setback of 180' from Hillwood Drive shall be established to provide a buffer from the adjoining farm. 4. A residential fence shall be located on Lots 1 -5 of Block 1. No lot shall be resubdivided to encourage a second building a lot at the front or rear until the property is annexed into the City of Hutchinson. 0 9 -M A! 7 MU R.R. 3, stahl's lake Hutchinson, K; 55350 6 1990 , .in, -. Hcran M -e--d Court•. Zcni-.g Administrator 830 B. 11th St. Glencoe, MN 55336 Re: Kokesch Sketch Plan Dear Mr. Homan, This is to inform you that Mrs Greg (Roxanne) Kokesch made an appearance before the Board of Supervisors of Acoma Township at our regular monthly meeting on Tuesday, June 5, 1990, seeking approval of the sketch plan. for Block 1, Lot 6, in Wood View Acres. After some discussion, a motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the sketch plan subdividing the lot. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Virgil Goetz, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors. Yours truly, Dorothy Bullert Clerk, Acoma Township 1 � i MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 19, 1990 1. CAIJ, TO ORDER FOR YOUR INFORMATI01 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 P.m. with the `ollowing members present: PlRoy Dobratz, Tom Lyke, Clint Gruett and Chairman Craig. ![en;r:rs absent: Dean Wood, Craig Lenz and Roland Ebent Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka. 2. MINUTES Hr. Dobratz made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, May 15, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY NORA PONSFORD TO MOVE A MANUFACTURED HOME Vice Chairman Gruett-reopened the tearing at 7:31 p.m. Building Official Jim Harka stated everything is in order, all criteria are met on the manufactured home. Chairman Craig read a letter from Lee Heinen a neighbcring property owner, opposing the proposal. Mr. Craig also read Section 6.07 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding the general welfare of the neighborhood. Mr. Gruett made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the hearing closed at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a motion to recommend approval to City Council. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion failed to pass due to a tie vote. Mr. Jack Alfredson, neighboring property owner, again voiced his opposition of his concern with the manufactured home fitting in the neighborhood. Discussion followed on the character of the neighborhood. Building Official Jim Marka called for a roll call vote, due to the tie, as follows: Mr. Lyke voted to approve, Chairman Craig voted to deny, Mr. Dobratz voted to approve and fir. Gruett voted to deny. Therefore, the Planning Commission has no recommendation to the City Council. E PI . HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6/19/90 (b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BOB HALL FOR GARAGE ADDITION LOCATED AT 345 MONROE Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:50 p.m. with the reading of publication #4125 as published in the Hutchinson Le ,der. on Thursday, June 7, 1990. The request is for the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to allow the owner to construct a garage addition to a nonconforming home located at 345 Monroe St. Mr. Hall commented on his proposal for the garage addition and the off- street parking requirements. Building Official explained the setback compliance. Discussion followed on the concerns with parking across the sidewalk. Leslie Smith, neighboring property owner, commented that he had no objections to the request. Mr. Dobratz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke the hearing closed at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a motion to approve the request. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. a (c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE TO REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR DECK ADDITION WITH RDOF REQUESTED BY VERN BRELJIE, 922 HASSAN Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:57 p.m. with the reading of publication #4133 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, June 14, 1990. The request is for the purpose of considering a variance by the owner to reduce front yard setback from 25' to 18' for construction of roof over deck located at 922 Hassan. Mr. Vern Brejlie commented on his proposed deck and the request for a roof caly not to enclose the whole deck. He also mentioned the three variances obtained by the neighboring property owners on a duplex in 1983. Building Official Jim Marka stated the criteria since 1983 has changed but since 1985 the statutes and laws have become more restrictive. Mr. Lyke read MN Statute 462.357 regarding undue hardships and creating hardships. Discussion followed on the purpose of State Statutes and the recommendations. Mr. Lyke made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:07 p.m. Mr. Lyke moved to deny the request due to lack of hardship. 2 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6/19/90 Seconded by Hr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF REPLAT OF WAGNER DE'V'ELOPMENT CORP. REQUESTED BY MRS. WAGNER Mr. Don Erickson explained the replat on Wagner St. and Kay St. to make the lots larger. Building Official Marka stated the staff is favorable to the replat. (b) CONSIDERATION TO HIRE BILL WEBER TO INCORPORATE SHORELAND ORDINANCE INTO ZONING ORDINANCE Jim Marka commented on the complexity of incorporating the ordinance and recommended to wait with this decision for the time being. - (c) DISCUSSION OF SAMPLE LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE City Forester Mark Schnobrich commented on his interpretation of the sample Andscaping requirements. Building Official Jim Marks stated the sample seems somewhat cumbersome for Hutchinson. Discussion followed on the requirements for cities the size of Hutchinson. (d) CONSIDERATION OF TEMPORARY RECYCLING SITE COLLECTION Building Official Marka commented on the events leading to this discussion. The City Council directed the City Administrator to instruct the Building Official the enforce the ordinance. Mr. Jim Henning, Henning Recycling, commented the present zoning ordinance. He stated his main objective is to be reliable and asked to allow him to remain in the location he is at until the ordinance is revised. He then explained his operation, the parking and cleanup. Discussion followed on the enforcement of the ordinance and recommendation to City Council. Mr. Don Erickson commented on his view of temporary recycling and stated an ordinance is necessary. Chairman Craig moved to recommend to City Council to hold 3 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6/19/90 the enforcement of the present ordinance up to 60 days to allow staff time to draft an ordinance to apply to temporary recycling centers. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried unanimously. (e) DISCUSSION OF UTILITY SHEDS Building Official Marka explained the City Council directed him to bring this discussion to the Planning Commission to revise the ordinance to accommodate larger utility sheds. Chairman stated that 12' X 16' utility buildings should be allowed.' Mr. Marka stated they should differentiate between new or old being moved unto the lot. Discussion followed as to a 10' x 12' or larger shed be incorporated into the ordinance with or without a conditional use permit. (f) DISCUSSION OF HOUSING CODE /DANGEROUS BUILDING CODE Mr. Marka commented dangerous buildings drafted ordinances buildings. on the need for a code to tear down and explained various cities have to understandably define hazardous Fire Marshal George Field explained the legal aspects. Building Official Marka explained this is a City Code but the Planning Commission should be aware of the ordinance. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to proceed with the proposal of this ordinance. (g) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT IN WOODVIEW ACRES REQUESTED BY ROXANNE KOKESH (2 MILE RADIUS) Roxanne Kokesh explained the proposal and her discussions with County Zoning Administrator Ed Homan. Mr. Lyke moved to approve the lot split with no objection, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the notion carried unanimously. (h) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Building Official hfarka stated that BRW will correct the Comprehensive Plan. 5. ADJOURMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:25 p.m. H hutchtnson 9D community S hospital 1095 highway 15 South. Mutcnnson. ALnre;ota 55?50 • 'er r., ^e c1e'55 2 18 June 19, 1990 The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and Members of the City Council City Hall 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members: At their regular meeting on June 1 9, 1990, the Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors considered two sets of bids which require your approval. Because our staff recommendations were to accept a bid other than the lowest bid for either set of equipment, a legal opinion was obtained from the City Attorney. This opinion is enclosed for your review. The first set of bids concerned the purchase of ultrasound equipment for the Hospital's radiology department. This equipment will enable us to improve our present radiology service and provide more services to the communities we serve. The following reflects the Board's discussion on this item: "Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Skeie, to request authority from the City to accept the bid for ultrasound equipment from Advanced Technology Laboratories in the amount of $194,176. All were in favor. Motion carried." The Board then considered bids for the purchase of anesthesia gas machines and anesthesia and post- anesthesia recovery (PAR) patient monitoring systems. This equipment is needed to provide state -of- the -art anesthesia services to patients utilizing Hutchinson Community Hospital. The bids include a five -year service contract, as well, to ensure reliable service and cap the cost of repairs during this five -year period. The following reflects the Board's discussion on the anesthesia bids: / "Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Nissen, to request 1 t authority from the City Council to accept the bid for anesthesia gas / machines and service contract from Ohmeda in the amount of C $255,711.25, and to request authority to accept the bid for anesthesia and post- anesthesia recovery (PAR) patient monitoring \ systems at a cost of $62,635.30. All were in favor. Motion carried. J 0 Letter to Mayor Ackland and City Council Representatives June 20, 1990 Page Two Thank you for consideration of these requests. If you have any questions regarding either of these bids, please contact me. Sincerely, H TCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Philip G, raves Administrator PGG:Ih Enclosure 0 IlR rl t It ;ul FFI-41 ,-1FrY L: . (h::i A.ELL RJ7:H 7Q DAVID R. ARNOLD CwA Las R. CARMION CART D. #eDO•ELL STEVEN L ANDERSON C. RARRT ANDRRSOR' STE' IF S. WOOS LAORA R. r XTLAND DAVID A. DRCEOOL)tAN)T PAUL D. DOVA JOSErn H. rA1EME2eT JAM as TTTLET JULIA A. CHRISTIANS RICLIARD O. Xc Kz TIMOTHY W, rAT1NS June 15, 1990 Am OLD & MGDOWELL Arroxxers Ar Lsw 101 PARR PTACE li "TCHINSON. M131MRSOTA 55350 (612)567.7575 TELECOrlaR (012) "I.1 ARSIDEtTT ATTORNET O. RARRT ANDERSON Mr. Philip Graves Hutchinson Community Hospital Administrator Hutchinson Community Hospital 1095 Highway 15 South Hutchinson, MN 55350 9 RE: Award of Contracts for Anesthesia Gas Machines and Ultrasound Equipment Our File 4: 3750 Or 00"'AL .ILLIAR .. CANR CNARLRS CLAYTON OART Y. ORCR RR •l. el CEDAR LANE ROAD MINwEA"LIV. N1NNEwOTA 65Ale lost) T -woo MR TOLL TREE SOO.00 ..1S TELRCOl1ER(ele) 043.1 0 501 'OUTS POCRTH VTRXST rwtNostow. wtwwiSOTA Se»i 0 -22LS TELECOriER (e12) 3A9-5501. Dear Mr. Graves: It is my understanding that the Hutchinson Community Hospital desires to purchase the Ultrasound unit based on a bid submitted to ATL in the amount of $194,176 which is approximately $20,000 higher than the lowest bidder (Diasonics) and also desires to purchase Omeda's CD Anesthesia gas machine system which will cost the Hospital approximately $224,811.25, approximately $13,931 more than the competitive system. Any examination of bidding procedures must begin with Minn. Stat. Section 471.345, subd. 3 which provides "if the amount of the contract is estimated to exceed $15,000, sealed bids shall be solicited by public notice in the manner and subject the requirements of the law governing contracts by the particular municipality...." The statute goes on to specifically provide "the purpose of this section is to establish for all municipalities, uniform dollar limitations upon contracts which shall or may be entered into on the basis of competitive bids, quotations or purchase or sale in the open market. To the extent inconsistent with this purpose, all laws governing contract by a particular municipality or class thereof are superceded. In all other respects, such laws shall continue applicable ( Minn. Stat. Section 471.345, subd. 6. - CRAT1r1ED AS A C3"L TRIAL %PrCIALITT OF TRW NINA&SOTA STATE BAR AS�OC 4TlOw 04 /1E.TIrfFO AS . RKAL rworxnw LA. RrEcIALLJT 1!T TRW M,MARSOTA STATE TAR Al \OCIATIOR 9- TUI -1` -1340 16:00-", FF'061 ARIOLC hM:;•.a.ELL HUTCH Mr. Phil Graves June 15, 1990 Page 2 The Hutchinson city charter, has adopted at the general election on November 3, 1987, provides in Section 6.05 that "contracts shall be made in compliance with the Uniform Contracting Law, and whenever competitive bids are required, the contract shall be let to the l owest responsible bidder (Emphasis added.] Analysis of the question presented is difficult because this is not the kind of situation to be net by the uniform bidding statute. For example, the uniform bidding statute is typically applied with municipal street improvements and in that instance, contracts are almost uniformally awarded to the lowest bidder, even if the city would have been more comfortable with a higher bidder. In short, there is very little discretion in many bidding situations. 0 However, the analysis does not stop with the lowest dollar value. "Responsibility" in bid statutes, means not only financial responsibility but also integrity, skill and the likelihood of the bidder doing faithful and satisfactory work. Kelling v. Edwards 116 Minn. 484, 134 N.W.2d 221 (1912). More importantly, value does not always depend on price alone. As the Supreme Court for the State of Minnesota observed, "(W)here bids are requested on equipment that is not subject to exact specifications, the council must be allowed some latitude in considering not only the price, but the suitability of the article or the use for which it is intended.., the discretion exercise must be reasonable and must be based upon some substantial difference in quality or adaptability." otter Tail Power Company v. village of Wheaton 49 N.W.2d 804 (1951). I have reviewed the information you have provided to me regarding the Omeda system. It seems to me that particularly in view of the adaptability of the Omeda system to future use, the Hutchinson Community Hospital Board could legitimately award the contract to Omeda even though it is not the lowest bidder. 2 also note that the Oneda appears to provide better care to patients because of its broader range, and certainly patient care would be a very important factor in any award of a contract. As to the Ultrasound equipment, the award to ATL would also seem to be appropriate in view of its adaptability and problems with the other units. I note that all of the other equipment either had problems based on inspection or did not fit the needs of the Hospital (Toshiba) or service reliability was a serious concern. In view of the factors, it is my conclusion that the Board's `_ ;27 7_-401 x.07 0 Mr. Phil Graves June 15, 1990 Page 3 decision to award the contract to ATL would likely be upheld. I must emphasize that awarding a contract to a bidder other than the apparent low bidder is not a step to be taken lightly and should be done only when there are substantial and significant reason to do so. It would be my suggestion that if the Board wishes to award the bids to Omeda and ATL, that specific findings be arrived at for the superiority of these two pieces of equipment. The research and analysis set forth in the memoranda dated June 1, 1990 and May 26, 1990 are acceptable although I would omit reference to the origin of the equipment as that would not appear to have anything of the quality of the equipment, its suitability or adaptability or other problems relating to any of the equipment. Judging from our past discussions, I understand that factor was a "throw in" anyway. I hope this correspondence is helpful additional information or have questions, to contact me. Please let me know if you . information returned. Best personal regards. Very truly yours, �ARNOLD & MCDOwELL 4^ , _ A N . G. Barry Ande GBA /lls 0 to you. if you need you should not hesitate desire to have the bid To the Hutchinson City Council We as officers of the Hutchinson Band Boosters respectfully make the following request: We would like to have the city of Hutchinson participate with us in the transportation costs for the Marching Band to other communities. We would like to suggest a contribution of 50% with a limit of $250 for the summer. The band does represent both the school and the city at these functions. The Band Boosters currently pay the entire amount. We appreciate any help that is given and as Band Boosters we along with the kids of Marching Band thank the council for all support and backing given to the band. Officers of Band Boosters Pres. Sandy Igl V. Pres. Doug Yerks Sec. Judy Wright Treas. Nancy McGraw u /o -A. • • �ST AvE sE W W 4� V) ku nn 'c a �W �b �w ud p P 3F ww v R� v N LOAD tio- AREA U.B.C LOADI -Cr AeEA Z .1T1ZAn10E 2 �qr • .'. Have11SIF 13 4 WOIZTrt 2 iS t4 3 ! 12 a 10 9 � III 12 4 12" lo • ° 2 � �: j � e a I' ° I 8 • { h • 1 � ' I 2 w NUE S.E. 12, _ 1 C47M REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 26, 1990 • ---------------------------------------------------------------------- WATER & SEWE FUND *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 727.63 *Hutch Telephone telephone 293.11 *PIRA employer contribution 416.11 Aagard West curbside & drop boxes 1,076.30 Bro Tex coverall 83.35 Crow Chemical & Ltg towels 37.64 DPC chemicals 380.00 Electric Motor motor repair 83.28 Feed Rite acid 807.42 Hutch Utilities electricity 245.86 Hutch Iron & Metal iron 2.02 ISD ;742 workstudy students 50.79 Juul Contracting repair water leak 1,697.00 Logis May comp service 1,203.24 MN Wastewater Oper Assc reg -Lanz & Graham 130.00 MN Valley Tes':ing tests 16.00 P & L Mechanical appl #8 8,258.90 Quade Electric repair 235.98 Share Corp detergent 197.66 St. Paul Book supplies 49.86 Stringer mtce contract 195.00 TEK Mechanical adapter & coupler 9.27 . VWR Scientific parts 397.24 Water Products gear 4.01 TOTAL $16,597.67 CENTRAL GARAGE *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 90.07 *PERA employer contribution 52.74 Hutch Iron & Metal iron 19.90 Quade Electric lamp 29.00 W.D. Cooling repair 28.75 TOTAL $220.46 // ,I' F • GENERAL FUND *DNR registration fees 542.00 *Kathryn Whalen hours worked 283.50 *Ilormandale Garden tour fee 36.00 *Hutch Telephone telephone 3,547.68 *!'NR registration fees 23c ".00 *Canterbury Downs clubhouse 92.00 *t7ithhold Tax Acct employer contribution 4,271.85 *mission Creek admissions 1,370.80 *Commissioner of Taxation May sales tax arena 155.99 *PERA employer contribution 4,946.86 *DNR registration fees 262.00 *MN Twins 46 tickets 463.00 Albrecht Oil fuel 29.72 All Seasons cherry tree 44.95 Am Hotel Register ash trays 32.60 Am Public Works Assc reg- J.Rodeberg 225.00 American Risk June services 800.00 American Welding oxygen & rent 18.00 American Red Cross manuals 100.40 Antony, Terry refund garden tour 9.00 Arlt, Lucille St. Louis tour party 46.91 Arnold & McDowell Jane legal services 3,000.00 Baasen, Eugene safety glasses 80.00 • Bennett Office supplies 39.75 Blevins Concession slush syrup 28.11 Boelter, Gale safety glasses 76.45 Brandon, Howard program switch 20.00 Erinkman Studio films 43.41 Brinkmeier, Jodi umpire 4.00 BRW prof services 628.92 Camera Shop film 14.50 Century Labs cleaner 98.04 Clarey's Safety Equip air pak parts 193.75 Clark, Linda refund softball 20.00 Coast to Coast supplies 21.35 Com of Transportation hanger payment 700.00 Copy Equipment flagging tape 23.43 County Treasurer parcel listing 12.50 County Treasurer DL fees 178.00 Crosby, Anita refund baseball 22.00 Crew River Glass adjust doors 25.00 Crow River Country Club 131 dinners 885.50 Dumrmer, Dennis refund volleyball 8.00 Ebert, Michelle refund softball 8.00 Eng, Bonnie refund baseball 6.00 Erickson, Don league conference 116.87 Feed Rite demurrage charge 25.00 • Feed Rite Fitzharris Athletic paint bats 97.90 83.21 FMAM meeting 45.00 • Forestry Suppliers flagging 27.64 Glaeser, Cheryl refund swimming 10.00 Graslie, Adeline refund garden tour 9.00 Gray, Jean training seminar 5.47 Greenbriar Floral flowers 10.50 Hacker, Laurie refund softball 8.00 Hager Jewelry plastic & engraving 17.50 Hanson, Deborah refund swimming 10.00 Harris Mechanical thermostat covers 59.78 HCI training coupon 75.00 Hutch Com Hospital Valley Fair tickets 352.00 Hutch Iron & Metal iron 24.60 Hutch Ump Assoc umpires for fastpitch 420.00 Hutch Utilities electricity 7,428.44 Hutch Fire & Safety inspectins 62.00 Ingleman /A & B Electric small cities loan 253.75 Insurance Planners insurance 672.00 IRS user fee 2,500.00 Jim's Garden mowing lots 580.00 Jindra, Zandra refund vball & softball 16.00 K -Mart flower pot & whistles 51.43 Karg, Larry workshop 25.00 Kasisch, Mary Anne refund softball 8.00 Kemper, Jennifer refund for scorebook 4.55 Kuhl, Linda refund softball 8.00 • Kurth, Clarence concession work 31.60 L & P Supply fuel cont 15.95 Larson, Brad refund softball 20.00 Litchfield City of chair rental 27.50 LMCIT insurance 230.00 Logis May comp service 6,155.69 McBroom rail cups 31.44 Merrill, Ken league conference 133.49 MIAMA 1990 dues 75.00 Mini Biff rentals 820.00 MN Sports Fed girls fastpitch entry 210.00 Niska, Patsy CJIS course expense 35.15 Northern States Supply supplies 42.47 Peterson, Jean refund garden tour 9.00 Pikal, Nancy refund softball 8.00 Pitney Bowes postage meter 100.50 Plotz, Gary league conference 158.83 Prechel, Jacquelynn refund softball 10.00 Prints Charming t- shirts 4,031.35 Pulkrabek,Betty refund Mission Creek 24.00 Puschmann, Dennis refund softball 8.00 Quade Electric fan blades 4.70 Raddatz, Joel safety boots 29.99 Reinke, Ken overpayment of fees 10.00 Reynolds Fence brace bands 14.93 • Rite Way Auto bus washes 51.50 Rodier, R. refund pentacular 82.00 0 • 0 Runke, Ardel.l refund softball 8.00 Runke, Laurie refund softball 8.00 Rutz Plumbing gaskets 30.90 Saltman salt 32.50 Schmeling Oil grease 11.35 Schuetz, Sherry refund volleyball 8.00 Schwarze, Rhonda refund softball 8.00 Sears vac filter 12.01 Selander, Dean refund volleyball 8.00 Servicemaster library carpet shampooing 424.50 Shopko supplies 27.57 Sitz, Donald mowing lots 285.00 Smith, Dorothy MV aor;:shop 33.62 St. Paul Book supplies 93.36 Standard Printing pens & folders 61.70 Starke, Randy safety boots 30.00 State Register books 205.70 Sturges, Sandy refund softball 8.00 Tepley, Robert refund volleyball 8.00 Treichler, Marie refund :softball 10.00 Trevino, Pedro refund volleyball 8.00 Upin, Andi refund softball 8.00 US West June service 98.54 Walters Swim swim suits 371.70 khalen, Kathy hours worked 346.30 Wieweck, David refund softball 8.00 Youth Center Fund transfer of funds 23,000.00 TOTAL $74,217.45 • 0 BO FUN DS 1980 TAX INC DEBT SERVICE Ingleman Design /'B Electric DURNS M ANOR CONST Patch Erickson Madson St. Cloud Restaurant YOUTH CENTE *Withhold Tax Acct *PEP City of Hutchinson 1990 TAX INC CONST Pace Lab Inc Moody's Inc Dorsey & Whitney • Wilson Development LIQUO FUND City Lottery Sales Bureau of Alcohol City of Hutchinson Withhold Tax Acct PERA City Lottery Sales City Lottery Sales City of Hutchinson Con of Revenue Withhold Tax Acct PERA Ed Phillips Johnson Brothers Quality Wines Griggs, Cooper Friendly Beverage Locher Bros Triple G Lenneman Locher Bros • Coast to Coast Electro Watchman Hutch Leader 8% loan phase 1 interior dishwasher & heater TOTAL employer contribution employer contribution water, sewer & refuse TOTAL professional services mun Land rating legal services relocation servicesw TOTAL lottery sales special tax payroll employer contribution employer contribution lottery sales lottery sales payroll May & 1/2 June sales tax employer contribution employer contribution liquor liquor liquor liquor beer beer beer beer beer calculator & supplies quarterly charge newcomers book 5 96.25 10,458.91 5,375.00 $15,833.91 62.42 36.56 157.73 $256.71 2,299.62 4,000.00 5,810.34 588.50 $12,698.46 19.00 250.00 4,386.33 318.94 184.51 399.00 989.00 4,649.61 14,134.37 334.53 193.01 9,443.33 8,133.52 3,996.77 3,827.23 460.70 7,888.70 15,171.70 2 8,085.15 52.41 111.00 151.00 0 LI KDUZ -KKJR Junker Sanitation Retail Data Systems A.H. Hermel Bernicks Pepsi Col Coca Cola Bottling Gopher Sign Co. City of Hutch Kenneth Merrill 6 adv 124.00 refuse charges 108.75 ribbons 55.00 candy 88.50 supplies 58.80 supplies 349.55 sign 130.34 lottery sales 1,104.00 logis meeting 15.39 TOTAL $105,380.49 • (612) 587 -5151 71V1CN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN, 55350 FOR YOUR )NF_ORNa10N M E M 0 DATE: June 18th, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official RE: Country Club Terrace Evacuation Plan Regarding the status of Hutch, Inc. /Country Club Terrace Evacuation Plan, I believe the attached letters from the Department of Health dated 5 -22 -1990 and 6 -14 -1990, are self explanatory. JGM /pv attachment cc: Marilyn Swanson G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney Steve Madson, Chief of Police Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator minnesota department of health division of environmental health Q 925 s.e. delaware St. p.o box 59040 minneapolis 55459 -0040 (612) 627 -5100 June 14, 1990 Hutch, Incorporated 3 369 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dear Ladies /Gentlemen: FOR YOUR INFORMATION On May 24, 1990, you received a letter by certified mail informing you that a prehearing conference which had formally been scheduled for April 6, 1990 was being rescheduled for June 12, 1990 at 1:30 p.m. No one representing Hutch, Incorporated appeared for the prehearing conference nor did we receive any written or oral messages concerning the prehearing conference by 4:30 p.m., on June 12, 1990. Because of this, we have recommended to the Office of the Attorney General - Health Division, that a contested case hearing be scheduled before an Administrative Law Judge to determine if the license of Hutch, Incorporated to operate a manufactured home park, granted and issued by the State Department of Health, pur;w ;nt to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 327, should be revoked. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please communicate with us at 612/627 -5022. Sincerely your, Charles B. Schneider, R.S., Chief Environmental Field Services CBS /lw cc: Sheldon Christenson/ 1 0 E • minnesota department of health division of environmental health 925 s.e. delaware st. p.o box 59040 minneapolis 55459 -0040 16121 6275 May 22, 1990 Hutch Incorporated 369 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Dear Ladies /Gentlemen: FOR YOUR 11'FORIvIATION Previously we had scheduled a prehearing conference for April 6, 1990, to determine whether to initiate license revocation proceedings on you for Country Club Terrace Mobile Home Park, located in the City of Hutchinson, McLeod County, Minnesota. In response to the notice of that prehearing conference sent to you on February 27, 1990, you informed us during a telephone conversation on April 5, 1990, that a tentative agreement with the City of Hutchinson for use of the basement of the police building as a storm shelter had been reached. It was indicated that the agreement needed to be finalized, maps and procedures drawn up and distributed to the occupants of the park. As a result of that information we continued the hearing indefinitely. We are now scheduling the hearing for June 12, 1990, at 1:30 p.m. at the same location indicated in the previous notice. The reason for this is that we have received a copy of a memo from James G. Marka, Building Official, addressed to the Chief of Police, the City Administrator, the City Attorney and the Mayor and City Council of Hutchinson. The content of that memo does not appear to indicate favorable progress towards gaining municipal approval of an evacuation plan. Unless you obtain municipal approval before June 12, 1990, plan on attending the prehearing conference. The purpose of the hearing and other governing factors are contained in the previous notice which you received March 5, 1990. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please communicate with us at 612/627 -5022. Sincerely y Charles B. Schneider, R.S., Chief Environmental Field Services CBS /lw cc: Sheldon Christenson James G. Marka, Building Official. Paul Zerby, Attorney General's Office HUTCH, INC. 369 EAST KELLOGG BOULEVARD ST. PAUL, MN 55101 Qp021 JUG ":1990 June 20, 1990 `Ej�ED c� Sy Minnesota Department of Health 925 S.E. Delaware Street P.O. Box 1 9040 Minneapolis, MN 55459 -0040 FO YOLW Attn: Mr. Charles B. Schneider, R.S., Chief /N FOR T /oN Gentleman: Received your June 14, 1''90 letter. I had planned to attend the June 12 conference but was detained out of town longer than anticipated. We still have not arrived at an acceptable evacuation plan with the City of Hutchinson. The city does not want to offer a public building primarily due to the potential traffic congestion that could result with people driving to the building. It appears that our only alternative is to build a shelter. Unfortunately we have lost over thirty tenants since last year and cash flow has been almost nil. It will be difficilt to finance a shelter at this time. We will however proceed with planning, design and bidding for such a facility. We will attack the financing part when we know approximately what the shelter will cost. In the meantime, I'm confused aL, to regulations that may exist regarding side, shape, structural requirements, ventilation, lighting, etc. Does the state have published requirements? If so, please forward them to my attention. Very truly yours, HUTCH INC. "r/" �4 W.R. Block WRB /mb cc: ✓Gary Plotz City Administrator City of Hutchinson 1 W.R. BLOCK, GENERAL MANAGER • 612 - 228.9564 0 /nRTIOnRL EnoowmenT FOR THE RRTS Mr. Richard L. Jeanette Accounting Director Minnesota State Arts Board 432 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Miq 55102 Dear Mr. Jeanette: FOR YOUR INFORMATION On behalf of Chairman John Frohnmayer, it is a pleasure to inform you that your organization has been awarded a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts. Grant Number 90- 6243 -0028 Application Number A89- 017146 Sponsoring Program(s) LOCALS PROGRAM Amount Awarded $300,000 To: Minnesota State Arts Board Start Date July 1, 1990 End Date June 30, 1993 Grant funds are provided for the following purpose(s) To support a Statewide Local Arts Initiative, with the goal o` strengthening the local arts agency component of Minnesota's art service system, as outlined in your application cited above and the enclosed project budget. "It is a condition of this grant that matching funds include $334,000 in new state and $634,000 in new local public appropriations. Grant funds will be made available to you after receipt and acceptance by the Endowment of adequate public appropriation documentation. Please refer to instructions enclosed fnr "Certification of Receipt of Public Funds." The obligation of the Endowment shall not be increased unless agreed to in writing by the chairman or a duly authorized representative." The enclosed "General Terms" for grants from the National Endowment for the Arts specifies the Endowment's regulations, procedures and other requirements and references the Office of Management and Budget Circulars which apply to this grant. Note that at paragraph two these "General Terms" include a restriction on use of Arts Endowment grant funds newly enacted by Congress for Fiscal Year 1990. Please read the "General Terms" carefully. WRSHInGTon D.C. 20506 RECEIVED MSAB A Federal ages cv adviud by the 0 90 _9 P2 88 ABR Natinoal Qeuu'd lO the Arta 0 Frr : REDOO ASSXji.TES. 1K. 612-33,'-2707. ewy.03.1930 04:11 " P03 CHAP'T'ER No, 566 S.F. No. 2617 1 reimburse the general fund :150,000 in 2 fiscal year 1991 for lottery - related 3 costs incurred by the department of 4 public safety. 5 Sec. 16. MINNESOTA HISTORICAL 6 SOCIETY 7 (a) General reduction (12$,000) 6 (b) Humanities commission 25,000 9 This appropriation is to plan a 10 Humanities center. it Sec. 17. BOARD OF THE ARTS 12 (a) General reduction (125,000) 13 (b) Matching grant 116,000 14 This appropriation is to match a grant 15 from the National Endowment for the 16 Arta. 17 Sec. 18. INDIAN AFFAIRS COUNCIL 18 (a) Reburial of Indian Remains 90,000 19 (b) Indian Business Loan Program 50,000 20 This appropriation is from the special 21 revenue fund. 22 The approved complement of the council 23 is increased by one position for this 24 activity. 25 Sec. 19. (MANAGING REDUCTIONS.) 26 Subdivision 1. (APPROPRIATION AVAILABILITY.) If the 27 appropriation from the general fund to an agency listed in this 28 act in either year of the biennium ending June 30, 19911 is 29 insufficient, upon the advance approval of the commissioner of 30 finance the appropriation for the othe_ year is available for it. 31 Subd. 2. (BASE REDUCTIONS.) The appropriations reduced 32 from an agency by this act, before any adjustments under 33 subdivision 1, must not be added back to the agency's 34 appropriation base for the 1992 -1993 biennium. 35 Sec. 20. (RULES FOR AQUACULTURE RESEARCH PERMITS.) 36 Not later than October 1, 1991, the commissioner of 37 agriculture, in consultation with the commissioners of healt 38 natural resources, and the ,eollution control agency, and the 39 advisory committee established under Minnesota Statutes, section 40 17. 49, subdiv 1, sha adopt rules to expedite permits from 0 0 0 (612) 587.5151 H!/7CH' CJTY OF HUTCH /NSON 37 WASHlNGTONAVENUE WEST HUTCHlNSON, MINN . 55350 July u, 1989 Regional Arts Council Forum c/o Mary Beth Rupp,President Crow River Arts Guild, Inc. P.O. Box 282 Hutchinson, MN 55350 SUBJECT: Hutchinson City Council Designation of Crow River Arts Guild Dear Regional Arts Council: This letter is to hereby certify that the Hutchinson City Council on June 27, 1989 designated the Crow River Arts Guild as its official representative for the arts in our city. Furthermore, the City Council has allocated a total of $30,000 in city monies over a three year period towards the Crow River Arts Guild grant proposal. The funding will commence in 1990. Sincerely, CITY OF HUTCHINSON Mayor Paul L. Ackland City Adstrator Cary D. Plotz Encl. cc: City Council Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Dir. 9 Fundraising goals and timeline Preliminary research summary Goals: FY 90 - 91 (fiscal year, June 1 to May 30) A. Establish budget committe with responsibility to report by Oct. 1990 on cash flow management system and budget allocations for individual committees. B. Raise $20,000 to achieve Phase 1 of Arts Partners /City of Hutchinson matching funds. Funding focus will be local and statewide individual, corporate and foundation interests and from additional government funds. FY 91 - 92 A. Raise $30,000 to achieve Phase 2 of Art Partners /City of Hutchinson match. Funding will include a Planned Giving program, venture income resources, special events fundraising and continued Foundation, corportation, individual and government grant revenues. B. Evaluation of fundraising program will be conducted and a funding report addressing future needs will be prepared. FY 92 -93 A. Balance of matching funds for Arts Partners /City of Hutchinson will be achieved or surpassed (est. $30,000). B. Regular evaluation and planning will be established Research summary A research day at the Amherst Wilder Library for Non- profits was very rewarding when I collected several books and monographs detailing basic fundraising strategy. As a result, our fundraising plan for the first year will be to approach a variety of Foundation and Corporate sources, large and small, local and statewide. The MN Council on Foundations directory has been thoroughly researched and a list of 50 candidates has been narrowed to 20 and from there to 12, basing selection on a list of criteria including programs typically supported, level of support, region of support, etc. Meanwhile, we will also develop an individual donor program and in the ensuing years will research and develop fundraising programs in area of planned giving and venture income endeavors. I can be reached on Fridays at the Art Center if there are further questions regarding fundraising activity. 0 i 0 A Hutcl *1 Parks & Recreation Supplement Crow Riverdm Summer '90 Children's Theatre 0 Center 146 South Main Street, Hutchinson, MN 55350 (612) 587 -0899 The summer children's theatre is a cooperative effort of the Crow River Art Center, Hutchinson Patios '& Recreation and Community Education. Classes are scheduled from June 18 -July 27. The two classes offered will focus on all aspects of theater production including stage movement, expressive projection, character development and cooperative ensemble acting. Opportunities at the Center — Children Cera (Donna Birk) 1. The Young Generation (Ages 6 -10) CREATING IN CLAY 1(Ages 7 -9) 2. The Entertainers (Ages I1 -17) An introduction to clay through the hand - building techniques of pinching and coil - building. Each FaZer'IrDale ii1m FS& student will have the opportunity to create an Jun 18 -Jul 27 1 -5 p.m. None individual piece, as well as contribute toward a Ic Limes and meeting places will be scheduled group project that will go through the firing egistrati - process. Performances of "'Once Upon a Shoe', Rhymes and Mimes of Mother Goose;' are scheduled for July 28 and 29, at 7:30 p.m. at the Hutchinson High School Auditorium. P11Y Pale Time F&-Q M Jul 930 9 -I1 a.m. $25 CREATING IN CLAY 11 (Ages 10-13) An introduction to clay through the hand- building techniques of pinching, coil- building, modeling, and slab construction. Each student will have the opportunity to create an individual piece, as well as contribute toward a group project that will go through the firing process. Music (Marybeth Rupp) A "sound experience" for students to explore and invent their own instrument from almost anything (even a kitchen sink ? ? ?). Participants will also create a musical composition for their instrument, performing the piece at a "Discovery Concert" presented at the conclusion of the session. WHAT MAKES A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT 1 (Ages 6-8) 2u 2= lima 2 Tu,Th J 10-19 10 -11 a. $10 WHAT MAKES A MUSICAL INSTRUMENT 11 (Ages 9 -13) DAY R= Time Esm Tu, Th Aug 7 -16 10-11 a.m. $10 Sketching (Rose Johnson) An introduction to quick sketch techniques. Part of the time will be in a classroom, while the other, if weather permits, will be spent in a park. LOOK, SEE, RECORD I (Ages 6-8) F P= Time FSJi Jul 24-31 9.11a.m. $10+$1.50 materials LOOK, SEE, RECORD II (Ages 9 -13) [D W Date Time DM Date Time E= W Jul Il -Aug 1 9 -11 a.m. $25 h Jul 26 -Aug 2 9.11 a.m. $10+$1.50 materials Opportunities at the Center — Adults Art Talks Informal monthly get- togethers with facilitator(s) to lead discussions on selected topics. Meetings will begin at 7:30 p.m. There is no fee for these events. May 8 ........Establishing Yourself As An Artist (Tom Soucek, Bonnie Utecht) June 26 ...... Readers Theater (Bette Hubin) July 31 ....... Thoughts on Writing Aug 28 ...... Photographic Art Forms (Jolen Sustacek, Kimberly Liedel) Opportunities at the Center — Family Performance Story Maestros Present: "'The Three Billy Goats Gruff, A Musical Exploration," an adaptation of the Norwegian folkiale interpreted in two ways: • Through the art of storytelling • Through music and visuals Violin ..................... .........................JoEllen Kimball Flute ..................... ............................ Marybeth Rupp Visuals .................... ............................Mary Boehlke Storyteller ................. ..........................Heidi Boehlke Back -up orchestra ............... .......................Audience PAY 12= Timer Esc Tu Jul 24 7 p.m. $1.75 (Children 5 -12) Free (Under 5) $3 (12 and over) All scats reserved Sculpture (Mary Boehlke) STORYBOOK ART 1 iG cr' Workshop ±� (Mary -Anne Olmsted- Kohls) �1y PARENTING WITH MUSIC Bring to life a favorite storybook character through the simple materials of wire, paper, paste and paint (papier- machd). Family members can work as a team or individually. DAY. II & it= E91 Th Jul 26 -Aug 9 7.9 p.m. $104$5 materials (Child) $15 +$5 materials (Adult) Drawing p a- (Char Laxen) SEEING THE WORLD TOGETHER Family members learn basic drawing techniques that will be incorporated into a still life, or, if weather permits, something seen at one of the neighboring parks. It--- FSg Aug 7 6:30- $3.50 (Child) 8:30 p.m. $5 (Adult) This workshop is designed for parents of newborns to pre - school aged children. Learn to enrich moments using music and songs while rearing your young child. Non - musicians and monotones are encouraged to attend. Pax PaR Time Esc Tu Jul 17 7 -9 p.m. $5 (Adult) $7.50 (Couple) Registration at the Hutchinson Parks & Recreation Center on May 1 and 2 from 6-8 p.m. The Crow River An Center and its program- ming are made possible with the help of: • The City of Hutchinson • 3 -M • SMAHC (Southwest MN Arts and Humanities Council) • NEA (National Endowment for the Arts) e wow w w_ 0 0 \rts Guild attaining goals o&Community ith the abun- dance and variety of talent in the Hutchinson area it seems only rtural that there be an agency here people of various talents can id a support group. That agency is e Craw River Arts Guild (CRAG). Founded in 1985 by several local Lists and art advocates, the Arts uild has become a means for ising the visibility of arts in the rea. It also provides a network of ipport for artists at all different :vels of accomplishment. In addition, the Arts Guild has rown over the last four and one half ears to provide educational prog- ams for artists and for those who njoy the arts. The progrAs range om classes in music to art shows nd even live theater. Joyce Young, art center coordi• tator for the Arts Guild, explained tow the organization got its start. its Guild formally organ - ze 85, she said, with the goal f'i ving the visibility of arts in he community.' Once organized, he group founded itself as a ion -profit organization to serve .1cLeod, Meeker, Wright, Renville end Carver counties. During the next four years, the Troup increased in number and there was evidence of mo(e interest oward the arts in the community. Young described a telephone poll theArts Guild conducted to find out just how interest in the arts Hutchin- son residents were. Of the residents polled, 81 percent said they wanted more art activities in the communi- ty. Also significant, 74, percent favored the establishment of an *art center; 60 percent would partici- pate in a program for arts and 81 percent said they favored a $1 per resident city contribution to deve- lopment of community arts. It was just prior to that time that the Arts Guild had learned of a grant Members of the Crow Rivers Arts Guild were pleased to learn March 1 that the guild now has a center of op- eration at 146 5. Main. Gathering to clean the building and prepare to move in were: (back, from left) Marlene Kubista, Ann Reid, Mary Boehlke, art center coordlna- available through the National Endowment for Arts. , In order to apply for the grant, however, the Arts Guild needed the involvement of a city agency. Guild members looked to the Park and Recreation Department for help. Young said the group chose the department because of the ,familiar- ity Park and Recreation Director Dolf. Moon had with an centers., Prior to moving to Hutchinson, Moon worked for the Park and Ricreation . department in New Ulm. White in New Ulm, he worked with that city's an center and he , seemed the Art Guild's logical choice, Young explained. In June 1989, the Arts Guild went before the Hutchinson City Council to request the city's support of the grant'application. Since it was a matching grant, one of the stipula- tions for applying was that the city for Joyce Young, Arts Guild President Linda P visory board chairman Robert Wilde; (front, Artbeat editor Beth Klopfleach, Linda fry Kathy Mullins. ADVOCATE AGENCY CITY OF HUTCHINSON agree to match the grant award.' Young said the group was prepared to be told to wait at least one month before the. council approved the application. It was a surprise, she said, when the council voted to approve the grant applica- tion the first time it came before members. One month later, the group was informed it had received a $30,000 grant from the National Endowment for Arts for the three -year period, 1990 -93. In addition, as required by the grant, the city gave the Arts Guild x: $30,000 for that same period. With the fundir by the two grants and ar $5,000 grant from 3 Hutchinson, the Arts than a month ago, anai the goals it had set beginning. As of March 1, the' Arts Guild has an art cc Main St. Text and photo Robin Shoen, sl wol� FOR YOUR INI ORNIATIO; 0 HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL The Hutchinson Safety Council met May21, 1990 at 12:00 noon at the Heritage Center. There were 9 members present. President Gee. Field introduced John Rodeberg, City Engineer as the quest speaker. He spoke on the upcoming city projects which will be about 2,000,000.00 worth of work, mainly street projects. In 1993 Hwy. #7 from Hutchinson to Silver Lake, new road and repaired. In 1992 The golf course road repaired /rebuilt. In 1990 (fall) The Crow River Dam will be repaired. A discussion was held about the repairs and rebuilding of streets and in new additions and new sidewalks. John was asked to be a member of the Safety Council and he accepted and will be the representative from City Hall,and will put on the membership list. President Field called the meeting to order and the April minutes were accepted. Old Business: We will be in the Jaycee Water Carnival Parade on June 17th as we received a OK from them. No more information on the Fair_ Booth. Hutchinson Safety Council will have some information ready for distribution at the Hutchinson Fire Dept. Open House on Sept. 15th - -- Hunting safety and Bus safety. More information at a later meeting. New Business: Warren Kempfert stated that on Fair Ave and Jefferson going West vehicles cannot see North due to trucks blocking the view. A discussion was held as this is on Larsons Const. property. Geo. Field will contact the police department on this. Discussed stop signs at County Market , they are on private property. Also on Fremont and service road. Maybe John Rodeberg can discuss this at the next meeting. Discussed "Watch for Children" o Q "Children Play Area" on 2nd Ave/ SW and the street department are the ones to contact. There was no treasurers report. The next meeting will be June 25. 1990. Geo. Field announced the speaker for this meeting will Jim Faber. Dist. Rep. for Insurance Underwriters. The meeting was adjourned by motion. Submitted by : George Field, President Loretta F. Pishney, acting secretary