No preview available
cp01-08-1991 c� IJ TC1 -11 Ni D O CITY Ult L EiND)" R T January 6 __ ; (� Janua= 12 V! E. S, D A -9- ('10:00 A.M. - Directors Meet at City Hall -6- 0 4 THURSDAY -10- 1.1 () N D A -7- 8:00 P.M. - Fire Department Meeting at Fire Station Noon - Receive Bids at City Hall for Shopko Phase II Developer Proposal 7:30 P.M. - City Council Meeting at City Hall. FRIDAY SA i U2DAY -12- CITY -WIDE CRAZY DAYS JANHARY 12 -13 --------- - - - - -- GEORGE FIELD) Building Official! MARK HENSEN ) Conference JIM MARKA ) January 9 -11 1 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Invocation - Rev. Harold Kelm, Bethany Baptist Church 3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 11, 1990; Special Meeting of December 27, 1990; Bid Opening of December 28, 1990 Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended 4. Routine Items (a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions 1. Building Official's Report - December 1990 2. Park & Recreation Board Minutes of November 28, 1990 3. Nurisng Home Board Minutes of November 29, 1990 • 4. Planning Commission Minutes of November 20, 1990 5. Financial Report - November 1990 (b) Charitable Gambling License for Hutch Baseball Assn. for American Legion (c) Popcorn And Concession Stand Permit for Mark McGraw (d) Snow Removal Permit 1. Lloyd Christensen 2. Ron Hansen - Hansen Gravel (e) Appointments 1. Health Board: Dr. Robert Hegrenes, Dr. Thomas Kleinkauf and Dr. George Smith 2. Fire Chief And Fire Department Officers Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed, issue licenses /permits, and ratify appointments u 11 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 8, 1991 5. MN Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M. (a) Letting No. 1, Project No. 91 -01 (b) Letting No. 2, Project No. 91 -02 (c) Letting No. 5, Projects No. 91 -07, 91 -08, 91 -09 (d) Letting No. 6, Projects No. 91 -10 & 91 -12 (e) Letting No. 7, Projects No. 91 -13 & 91 -14 Action - Motion to close hearings - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and order preparation of plans and specifications - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9400 - No. 9404 Communications, Requests And Petitions (a) Update On Luce Line Trail Action - (b) Communications from Lloyd Allen Regarding Acquisition Contract for Shopko Project Action - 7. Resolutions And Ordinances (a) Resolution No. 9388 - A Resolution Accepting $137,500 From Hutchinson Utilities Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (b) Resolution No. 9389 - Designating Official Newspaper Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (c) Resolution No. 9390 - Appointing Legal Counsel Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt u is • 2 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 8, 1991 (d) Resolution No. 9391 - Appointing City Administrator For 1991 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (e) Resolution No. 9392 - Entering Agreement With Pioneerland Library System For Calendar Year 1991 Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (f) Resolution No. 9393 - Designation Of Depositories Of City Funds In Commercial Banks And Institutions Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (g) Resolution No. 9394 - Designation Of Depository Of City Funds Federal Savings And Loan Associations • Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (h) Resolution No. 9395 - Resolution Approving Securities For Collateral From First State Federal Savings & Loan Association Of Hutchinson, Minnesota Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (i) Resolution No. 9396 - Resolution Approving Securities For Collateral From Marquette Banks Of Hutchinson, Minnesota Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt (j) Resolution Approving Securities For Collateral From Marquette Banks of Hutchinson As Sponsoring Agency Of The Hutchinson Utilities Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt • 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 8, 1991 (k) Resolution No. 9398 - Resolution For Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and adopt 8. Unfinished Business None. 9. New Business (a) Consideration of Amending Small Cities Grant Program Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (b) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Logs And Limbs Purchase Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (c) Consideration of Approving Purchase of Flash Gravity • Steam Sterilizer for Hutchinson Community Hospital Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (d) Consideration of 1991 Assessment Agreement with McLeod County Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement (e) Consideration of Hutchinson Area Transportation Plan Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (f) Consideration of Three -Month Freeze for General Fund Capital Expenditures Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve (g) Consideration of 1991 Position Classification /Pay Plan Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 9399 1] 4 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 8, 1991 (h) Selection of Council's Vice- President - John Mlinar Action - Motion to elect (i) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By M & P Partners, Acoma Township (Two Mile Radius) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County with contingencies (j) Consideration of Preliminary Plat submitted By Galen Houk (Two Mile Radius) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County 10. Miscellaneous (a) Communications from City Administrator • (b) Communications from City Engineer 11. Claims, Anoropriations And Contract Payments (a) Verified Claims Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 12. Adjournment • 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 1990 1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg, Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson. 2. INVOCATION The invocation was given by the Reverend Tim Caspers. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of November 27, 1990, joint meeting of November 27, 1990 and special meeting of December 3, 1990 were approved as distributed. 4. ROUTINE ITEMS • (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - NOVEMBER 1990 2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 24, 1990 3. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 26, 1990 4. HOSPITAL BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 16, 1990 5. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 1990 6. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF DECEMBER 4, 1990 7. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 19, 1990 (b) CIGARETTE LICENSES FOR 1991 (c) BINGO LICENSE RENEWALS (d) CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE RENEWALS (e) SNOW REMOVAL PERMIT 1. RANDY BLAKE 4. DENNIS GETZ 2. DAVID BLAKE 5. DOUGLAS PETERSON • 3. BUD REINERT IN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 0 The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to order the re- port and minutes filed and issue the licenses /permits. 5. PUBLIC HEARING None. 6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) REVIEW OF WATER AND SEWER RATES FOR COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE (DBA HUTCH, INC.) BY MANAGER BILL BLOCK Mr. Bill Block discussed the water billing for Country Club Terrace. He stated that the charges were for more water than the amount going through the meter. He claim- ed there was a $1,374 over - charge, and for the last four quarters the court was billed for 917,000 more gallons of water than actually used. Mr. Block felt the court should be billed for less than actual use since 100 per- • cent of the water used does not go into the sewer. He requested fair treatment and thought a 90 percent rate would be fair. Alderman Erickson stated that he thought this whole issue was resolved at the October 23 Council meeting. The cor- rection was to be made when the individual water meters were installed in the park and actual use could be deter- mined. Mr. Block stated that the individual water meters would be put in June of 1991. However, the park had been over- charged for all of 1990. He further commented that changing the billing quarter for sewer use did not work. Finance Director Merrill commented the City would have to manually adjust for billing. He pointed out the wording in the City ordinance regarding billing policy. Director Randy DeVries stated that the winter quarter is the only way to base the sewer use charge, and it's fair. He was available to check the meter lines in the park to determine if there was any leakage. Following discussion, Alderman Torgerson moved to charge the actual 1990 water usage on sewer charges based on the • winter quarter until the individual water meters are in- stalled June 1, 1991. Motion seconded by Alderman Erick- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 son. Motion amended by Alderman Torgerson to amend mo- tion to forgive late fees. Amended motion seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried. Main motion unanimously carried. (b) REPORT BY JOE DEJAEGHERE OF DNR REGARDING LUCE LINE TRAIL ROUTES IN HUTCHINSON Mr. Joe DeJaeghere reported on the progress of connecting the Luce Line Trail to the City recreational trail. Ap- proval was requested to designate a route along Arch Street to Second Avenue, subject to approval of affected property owners. The motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Alder- man Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and des- ignate the proposed stretch of Arch Street as a snow- mobile route, subject to permission of the property owners. • (c) COMPLAINT BY ARLYS KENDALL REGARDING CAR TOWED FROM STREET Ms. Arlys Kendall stated that one of her three cars was towed away from in front of her house, located at the corner of First Avenue S.E. and Adams, following a light snowfall. She reported there was no place to park but on the street. Ms. Kendall requested information regarding parking restrictions and snow plowing policy. Mayor Ackland informed Ms. Kendall that a City ordinance stated there was a time limit of 24 hours in which a ve- hicle may be parked on a public street. (d) DISCUSSION OF NON - CONFORMING SEPTIC SYSTEM ON DELAWARE STREET Realtor John Paulson reported a meeting was held with the property owners, City Engineer and Building Official to discuss the issue of the septic system on Delaware Street. A buyer wished to purchase a house at 1318 Dela- ware, and the bank needs to close on it by the end of the year. Therefore, permission was requested to allow the buyer to occupy the house before year -end and prior to installation of a new system of either a mound system or . City sewer and water services. Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to give CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 permission to occupy the property while the City de- termines the system to be used. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. 7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (a) RESOLUTION NO. 9366 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ONE HOUR PARKING AREA The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. (b) RESOLUTION NO. 9367 - TRANSFERRING $60,000 FROM THE LIQUOR STORE TO GENERAL FUND The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive read- ing and adopt. (c) RESOLUTION NO. 9383 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE . The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF REVOKING AND ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS (DEFERRED NOVEMBER 27, 1990) Engineer Rodeberg reported on the changes for municipal state aid streets. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve and waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9355 and No. 9356. Motion seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried. 9. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to authorize discontinuation of service unless other arrangements had been made, with the exception of Carol's Cafe. (b) CONSIDERATION OF FLEX SECTION 125 BENEFIT PLAN • • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 Atty. Anderson reported on the changes for the Flex Plan. Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve the plan and changes. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF UPGRADED TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL Mr. Walt Clay, President of Hutchinson Telephone Company, explained the Centrex system which is recommended for City Hall. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to accept the Centrex proposal from the Hutchin- son Phone Company. Motion seconded by Alderman Torger- son and unanimously carried. Mayor Ackland suggested holding a public forum to address the feasibility study of consolidated communications system in April after Police Chief Madson returns from the FBI Academy training. (d) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NO. 91 -01 - NO. 91 -14 Engineer Rodeberg reviewed the proposed improvement proj- ects for 1991. It was recommended that Project 91 -17 be put on hold. The Engineer reported that a meeting with MN /DOT representatives would be held on December 12 to discuss future routing of state highways, and he, the City Administrator and Mayor would be in attendance. Mention was made of a future need for an additional water tower. Engineer Rodeberg suggested hiring a consultant to determine the location. Ms. Connie Mangan, Small Cities Project Coordinator, re- viewed the downtown sprinkling project. It was recom- mended to sprinkle only the basements of buildings with second floor apartments which were being rehabilitated with the Small Cities Development Program funding. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and hold hearings on January 8, 1991 at 8:00 P.M., except for Lettings No. 3 and No. 4 to be held the second City Council meeting in January, and to • waive readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9369 - No. 9382. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 . (e) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 BUDGET FOR DRY DOCK YOUTH CENTER Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the use of any 1989 left -over balance to be applied to the 1990 budget. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve the 1991 budget. (f) CONSIDERATION OF BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE FOR 1991 Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9368. (g) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP. TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 8134 RELATING • TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ACCOUNT Administrator Plotz explained that the amendment to Reso- lution No. 8134 would allow for tax increment financing dollars to be available for Phase I and II of the Shopko project. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and waive reading and adopt Resolu- tion No. 9384. (h) CONSIDERATION OF 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN Administrator Plotz reported that the City's 457 Generic Deferred Compensation Plan was submitted to the IRS, and they had made minor modifications to the language in the plan. Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to approve the changes and waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9385. (i) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION TO ADVERTISE FOR AIRPORT CONSULTANT PROPOSAL • Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve advertising for consultant. (j) CONSIDERATION OF MERIT INCREASE FOR CITY ADMINISTRATOR Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car- ried, to approve a 1990 merit increase of 1.25 %, the same as last year. (k) CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL WAGE ADJUSTMENT FOR JANUARY 1, 1991 Mayor Ackland suggested that Aldermen Torgerson and Mlinar meet with the Directors at 7:30 A.M. on December 18 at City Hall to discuss the 1991 wage adjustment. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to table. • (1) CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND HAROLD L. AND LENNIE L. THOMPSON Following a report by the City Attorney, Alderman Erick- son moved to approve and enter into agreement. Motion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried. 10. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR City Administrator Plotz reported that bids would be re- ceived on December 28 for demolition or removal of struc- tures at the proposed Shopko site. All of the tenants will be out by January 1, 1991. The asbestos has been removed in two of the buildings and more work will be done. It was requested to approve a $1,000 claim for rent de- posit and miscellaneous moving costs from Laurie Sorega- roli. The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to approve payment. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimous- ly carried. Mr. Plotz stated the car impounding contract expired De- cember 31, 1990. Therefore, he requested authorization to advertise for bids. The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 carried, to approve advertising for bids. Administrator Plotz inquired about the closing time of City offices on Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve. After discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close on December 24 at 3:00 P.M. The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unan- imously carried, to close on New Year's Eve at 4:00 P.M. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CRAIG LENZ Alderman Lenz commented on the memorandum regarding holi- day Hutchmobile service and made the motion to make it City policy to operate on Veteran's Day and Thanksgiving Friday, in addition to President's Day and Martin Luther King Day. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unani- mously carried. (c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR Alderman Mlinar inquired about a joint meeting in January with the County Commissioners and other entities. Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to hold a meeting with the County Commissioners and County officials on January 14, 1991 at 7:00 P.M. at the Victorian Inn. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON Alderman Torgerson inquired about the progress of the demolition at the Shopko site. Administrator Plotz re- ported that by December 21 everything would be out of the buildings to be demolished. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY Attorney Anderson reported he had talked to the County Attorney regarding reapportionment by district. The City Attorney stated the same acquisition procedures used for Phase I of the Shopko project would be used for Phase II. Discussion followed regarding the use of a third party for negotiations and the involvement of John Bernhagen. The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, • seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to give the City Attorney and City Administrator, in addi- 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 11, 1990 tion to a third party, authorization to begin some type of negotiations. (f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND Mayor Ackland stated that the Police Department had re- quested that on December 15 all the Christmas lights in town be turned on at 7:00 P.M. and the church bells ring simultaneously in remembrance of Officer Mike Hogan who was shot and killed while on duty one year ago. The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the remembrance of Mike Hogan. 11. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald- erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds. 12. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 10:15 P.M. 41 • MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL THURSDAY, DECEMBER 27, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The special meeting was called to order at 11:30 A.M. by Mayor Ackland. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz and Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill. 2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 9386 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINANCE DIRECTOR TO SIGN GRANT AGREEMENT WITH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Torger- son, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. 3. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 9387 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman • Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive reading and adopt. 4. DISCUSSION OF WRITE -DOWN ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Atty. Neil Jensen stated he represented the Word of Life Church which was interested in purchasing 8.7 acres of land located in Paden's First Addition, Lot 1, Block 3. The bank had foreclosed on the property, and the County was scheduling to sell the property at auction in February or March for back taxes of $30,000. The last taxes were paid in 1985. It was reported that the unpaid assessments as of December 31, 1985 were $45,708.82, and with interest added the current amount would total $68,459.11. Atty. Jensen proposed that the Word of Life Church would pay an assessment total of $55,000. Discussion followed regarding the distribution of money to the City. Alderman Torgerson moved to approve the acceptance of the $55,000 for assessments with the stipulation that the County go along with normal payments of the delinquent settlement to the proper entities of the school district, city and county and the approval of the City Attorney. Motion seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried. • 5. CONSIDERATION OF 1991 WAGE ADJUSTMENT Alderman Torgerson reported on the meeting held with himself, 4�' CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 27, 1990 • Alderman Mlinar and the Directors to discuss wage adjustment. Alderman Torgerson moved to recommend a 38 increase, with the possibility of a 0 -1.88 increase in June or July depending on the financial picture of local government aid from the State. Motion seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried. 6. CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds. 7. MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION Alderman Mlinar commented that there is not adequate signage for snowmobiles coming into town. He had talked to the Park & Recreation Director regarding liability, signage and an area of undesignated trail. It was reported that the City cannot assume liability on pri- vate property. The DNR would be responsible for the area be- tween their trail and the City trail, and therefore, needed to • put up some signs. 8. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 12:25 P.M. LJ MINUTES �- BID OPENING FRIDAY, DECEMBER 28, 1990 The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Finance Director Kenneth B. Mer- rill and Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson. The reading of Publication No. 4184, Advertisement for Bids, Demo- lition Or Moving Of Structures Located In Downtown Shopko Develop- ment Site - Phase I (Letting No. 15, Project No. 90 -25), was dis- pensed with. The following bids were opened and read: Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. Hutchinson, MN $ 36,800.00 Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. Hamburg, MN 79,925.00 Duininck Bros., Inc. Prinsburg, MN 121,204.00 R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. St. Cloud, MN 48,565.00 Wickenhauser Excavating Cologne, MN 69,500.00 E & T Excavating, Inc. Hutchinson, MN 44,969.00 Fell Trucking & Excavating Waseca, MN 37,361.45 Structural Specialties Hutchinson, MN 80,558.00 EnviroNet, Inc. Edina, MN 99,808.00 The bids were referred to the City Engineer for review and a recom- mendation. The meeting adjourned at 2:14 P.M. C�i' 05811 n »ial r1..e u. n. n• ,.,..., _ - _ -__.. _. _ -___ __ _ ___ 0 0 • —u r -101 U.S. osrunww u iwC as s 0asat r 'i ia ►Mod hs v1Yeh MsmMa 4awa1 i 9ECER8 ER 19 0 - - fR.sw wrriet sin smtn ti wry and sdless ireYdNp 2MCads7 REPORT OF BUILDING OR Ss.r ZONING PERMITS ISSUED AND LOCAL PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION 103500 27 t 9999 065 1 0 26 9999 02730 JAPES NARKA BLDG OFFICIAL It your building permit system has changed. FOR CITY OF HUTCHINSON mark fXl appropriate box below and explain CITY NALL 27 WASHINGTON AVE WEST In comments. NUTCHINSON NN -`5350 El Discontinued issuing permits ❑ Merged with another system ❑ Split Into two or more systems ❑ Annexed land areas PLEASE COMPLETE AND MAIL ❑ Had other changes THIS FORM ON OR BEFORE J f k tip P Y 4 1 991 If no permits ware issued during Bureau of the Census Instructions are included. For MM th,s period, mark (X1 in the box ---� ❑ 1201 East Tenth Street further assistance, call collect andreturn this form JeHarsom,IIla, IN 47132 (3011 763 -7244. NEC NEW REST: 11TIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED H OUSENEEPING Item Number of N mber of BUILDINGS Valuation of Valuation of No. Buildings Housing construction Housing construction Buildings units Omit cents units Omit cents S) Ib) W Idl let If) ( 1 Single - family houses. detached Exclude mobile homes. 101 4 4 376.355 Single - family houses, an ached - Separated by ground to "pot wait, -NO units above or below, and - Separate hearing systems and utility me ra s. (Count each unit as a separate building) 102 Two - family buildings 103 Three- and four- family buildings #04 Five -or -more family buildings TOTAL - Sum of 107 -105 -y 4 376.355 NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLIC LY OWNED BOND EPING Item Number of Number of BUILDINGS BUILDINGS 7 Valuation of Valuation of No, Buildings Room, construction Omit cents Buildings Rooms construction Omit cents sal U) (cl (d) is) (1) (111 Hotels, motels. a ' tourist cabins luan m sle eccommodaGOns only) 213 Other nonhousekeeping shelter 214 1Z JUJIM NEW PRIVATELY OWNED PU BLICLY OWNED NONRESIDENTIAL Number Valuation of Item s, Valp BUILDINGS aeon of No, construction 1b,'uildings at tonstrurtion Omit cents buildings Omit cents Isl Icl Idl al Amusement, social, and recreational 319 Churches and other uli ious 319 Industrial strial 320 t Parkin garages buildings and open decked) 321 Service stations end repair garages 322 .1os itals and institutional 323 Office,, banks, and professional 13241 Public works and utilities 1325 SChppla and other educational 320 Stores and customer services 327 1 1 360 000 Other nonresidential buildings 328 Strutturas other than buildings 1329 ADDITIONS, PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLYOWNED ALTERATIONS, AND Item Number Valuation of CONVERSIONS Number Valuation of N of cohnn,cilon of construction buildings Omit crams, buildings Omit cents S) Ib) Icl Id) W Residential - Classify additions of Garages end carports M item 438. 43f 1 800 and Nonresidential and nonhousekeeping 137 2 10,6 Additlona of residential gauges end carports (attached and 138 - -- - -• •��� -•�.+ - e­1 111� aaaru. arU.pn AAVn raal,St VVNI( RIVE UNNEVENSESIVE — a 41-A-ic,a) DENIOUTIONS AND PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED RAZING OF tsm Nun" of Number of BUILDINGS N h ousin g Bi AIdMe Maus" unite uniu bl Ibl let 141 W Single family houses lattsched and detached) 645 Two family buildings 646 T hree and four family buildings 647 Five w -more family buildings 648 All other budding, and structures 1649 INDIVIDUAL PERMITS AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION VALUED AT 6600,000 OR MORE Please provide the following information for each permit authorizing construction valued at 1500.000 or more entered in sections I through IV. Item Number of No. from Dascri lion p Name and address of Owner- ship Valuation of own., or builder Mark fx1 construction Omit cents Housing 6 II—IV one units iel Ibl Icl Idl lel 1fl i 1 Kind of boiidi,p ❑Pnvav Sit. etldrssa _____________ _____________________ ❑Public s Kind of Ouildmp ______________ deed -- ❑Prirue r Site addren ----------------------------------- ❑Pabst 9 Kind of Dmldirp ------------- __-------------------- ❑Print, .._. - ________________________ sn..emea. ____________________ ❑PUNK 5 Kind or buildin ___ _____ ___________ ____ _________ ❑Prune dada__ Siu aednu __________________ ❑Public S Kind of buildmp ------------------------- I�Aivn, _dea_______ _______________ Sne addreae 1 KirW at buildmp ------------------------------------ E] Private 6ne atldreu s Nuq of DuiWmp ----------- - - - - -- OP,irn. - _ s,. dreaa ______________ ___ ❑Pabst S K,.0 01 Duildnp dada__ __________ _____ ❑Print, Siro addreae --------------- --------------------- ❑ P 6 Kira of ikinp ____ _______________________________ ❑Pnvata Save___________________ _____ Sda addmu s Comments Are you aware of any new permit- Inulng jurlsdicllons7 ® No Yes — Please give additional information in comments. Name of person to contact regarding this report Telephone JAMES G. HARRA Area code Number Eaunsion Title BUILDING OFFICIAL 612 587 -5151 210 0 � J MINUTES Parks & Recreation Board November 28, 1990 Members Present were Virgil Voigt, Lee Cox, J.P. Auer, Mike Schall, Linda Martin and Mike Cannon. Also present were Dolf Moon, Mark Schnobrich and Karen McKay. The meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. The Minutes dated October 24, 1990 were approved by a motion made by Mike Schall and seconded by J.P. Auer. The board unanimously agreed. Old Business Lions Club - Deane Dietel was present representing the Lions Club, they are interested in sponsoring the triangle park directly north of NAPA Auto Parts. The Lions would like to develop the area for a wayside rest. The board felt that the triangle area would pose a safety problem and recommended the area along Highway 7 east and Fifth Avenue northeast as a better site of picnicking and some playground equipment. Mr. Dietel will be meeting with Dolf to further discuss the Lion's plans and determine the site for their park. Election of Board - Mike Schall made a motion to nominate Lee Cox chairman of the board, Linda Martin seconded the motion. Virgil Voigt made a motion to cease nominations, Linda Martin seconded the motion. The board unanimously • agreed. Virgil Voigt made a motion to nominate Mike Schall Vice Chairmain, J.P. Auer seconded the motion. Linda Martin made a motion to cease nominations for ;he Vice Chairman, Virgil Voigt seconded the motion. The board unanimously agreed. 19_91 Budget - The board received an outline of the 1991 Proposed Budget. It will be finalized on Monday, December 3rd by the City Council. The board was concerned with the elimination of the wood chipper from the budget requests. Dolf told the board that with the current status of the wood burning permit, most wood scraps would be burned. He also said that the county purchased a new chipper and that if needed, it could possibly be leased from them at a reasonable rate. Mosquito spraying was questioned, Dolf told the board that it is a service the residents have grown accustom to. The cost of the product is $5,000 and that allows the crew to spray twice a week every other week. New Business Tree Report - The board received a copy of the 1990 Tree Removal in Hutchinson. It summarized the number of trees removed, the reason for removal and the length of time it took from the date of notice until removal. The University of Minnnesota is anticipating a small beetle population in 1991. Mike Schall questioned how Hutchinson compared to other communities in regard to removal. J.P. Auer questioned how removal compares with replacements. Mark Schnobrich, will investigate these questions and report back to the board. \J ,Z1 -,, �a� MINUTES Parks & Recreation Board November 28, 1990 Page two Recycling - The board received a 1990 Expenditure Report and a Proposed Budget for 1991 in regard to recycling. Hutchinson is a pilot program in McLeod County. The drop boxes are being used heavily, while residential curbside pick -up participation is at 44% in precincts one and four. The taxes collected at the McLeod County Landfill have been used to fund the recycling project in Hutchinson. Revenue Review - Dolf told the board that he would be conducting a survey of fees other communities charge in an attempt to generate more revenue. The survey will begin in December and continue into January. Christmas D - There have been many good comments in regard to the Christmas decorations. The cost was $4,000 to recondition the overhead decorations and $16,000 to purchase the 36 wreaths and wrap for the light poles on Highway 15 south. E Arena Update - The board received a copy of the five year plan to renovate the Civic Arena. The Facility Improvement Board met last week and reviewed the specifications for the new entrance. Construction has been delayed until April, 1991. Dolf and Mary are investigating the cost of new dasher boards, scheduled to be replaced in 1991. These improvements will be in place by the 1991 -92 ice season. • Mike Schall has heard some comments about the electric service in the concession stand, Dolf will check it out. Farmers_ Market - At a meeting with the downtown development, a location change for the Farmers Market was discussed. With the Shopko development in the downtown area, a new set up has been developed. One proposal includes a 200' by 30' structure south of the Crow River in Fireman's Park. This proposal had considerable opposition. Shopko will have their final plans in after the first of the year and a permanent site will be developed for the Farmer's Market. Agenda Items for December J.P. Auer requested that policies and procedures for girls in T -Ball and baseball be on the agenda for December. A djournment - The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. by a motion made by J.P. Auer, Mike Schall seconded the motion and the board unanimously agreed. klm BURNS MANOR MUNICIPAL NURSING HOME -A Minutes - November, 1990 i The Board of Directors for Burns Manor Municipal Nursing Home met Thursday, November 29, 1990. Chairperson James Mills called the meeting to order at 3:35 p.m. Members present: James Mills Elaine Black Marge Putney Don Erickson Roger Gilmer Linda M. Callier, Mike Carls Asst. Secretary Robert Koepcke, Secretary Members absent: None Press: Bob Watts, KDUZ /KKJR Robin Schoen, Hutchinson Leader Guests: Linda Nelson Duncan McDougal Burns' Department Managers Mr. Mills welcomed Mike Carls to the Board. MINUTES REVIEW A motion was made by Marge Putney and seconded by Elaine Black to approve the minutes from October 25, 1990. All in favor. Motion • carried. FINANCIAL REVIEW Reported on financial statements. Payments are coming slowly from Medicaid, notably that an advance payment from 1989 has recently been recouped. PHP has begun to pay its backlog. Discussion held on need for 1 office person dedicated to accounts receivable. Roger Gilmer reviewed accounts payable; James Mills will review in December. CAPITAL EXPENSES The following were presented: Maki Painting $11,595.00 Lundeen Flooring 18,000.00 A motion to approve was made by Kay Peterson and seconded by Don Erickson. All in favor. Motion carried. Discussion held on purchasing 2 TV /VCR units for up to $2,300 from Memorial Funds. A motion was made by Don Erickson and seconded by Roger Gilmer to approve the purchase contingent upon the Memorial Committee's approval. All in favor. Motion carried. �z -A • (-4) November Minutes Page 2 CONSTRUCTION UPDATE Robert gave report from "punch list" tour of November 28. Artwork • and carpeting should be largely finished by Open House Date. Noted that Department of Health wishes basement bathrooms to be handicapped - accessible. Since laundry room has ceiling, floor and air flow problems, it, the bathrooms and main stairwell /base- ment hallway should be improved. Architect Russ Rosa estimates this final, proposed change order may cost about $30,000.00. A decision will be made on this at the January, 1991 Board Meeting, contingent on remaining funds in the construction accounts. OPERATIONS UPDATE The subject of a 1991 Good Neighbor contract was discussed via presentation by Linda Nelsen and Duncan McDougal. It appears that the 1991 budget will be able both to offer wage increases and afford a GN fee of $50,000 (same as 1990). Linda and Duncan reviewed Burns /GN accomplishements since 1988; they stated that GN's main concern is "finishing their job" of making Burns truly self- sufficient, thus allowing a better merger with Hutchinson Community Hospital should that occur. Burns managers in attendance voiced their support for • a continued contract. This issue will be decided when the 1991 budget is presented and approved at the December Board Meeting. Don Erickson requested copies of the as -yet- tentative federal survey correction plans; noted that the partial re- survey in November showed compliance with federal nursing standards. Noted that the late Gustave Witte case may yet be subject to litigation, that the City Attorney and insurance carrier have been appraised and will represent Burns Manor if needed. Noted several complimentary letters to Board or staff on quality of patient care by appreciative families. Noted CNA training clinicals are being held at Burns Manor in cooperation with Hutchinson Technical College. Jan Luthens reported on staffing in the nursing department. Higher wages and weekend incentives definitely helping; incentives will remain on for the next month or two. Robert discussed a revised uniform policy with Burns Manor sub- sidies to begin in January, 1991. • November Minutes Page 3 . OPERATIONS UPDATE (con't.): Noted that Burns Manor has "invited" its own cooperation with i a Star /Tribune series on resident restraints; the series is scheduled to begin on December 2. ORGANIZATIONAL Progress on the Burns /HCH Task Force was discussed, that the strategic market plan has been completed; all Board members will shortly receive a copy, which shows positive need for the services a combined hospital /nursing home could provide. Charles Bailly & Co. will begin accounting analysis of the merger concept in December. All Board members are encouraged to attend the Open House on December 9 from 2 -4 p.m. There being no further business, Don Erickson motioned to adjourn this meeting, with the next meeting to be held December 20, at 5:00 p.m. Seconded by Roger Gilmer. All in favor. Motion carried. Re, &p tfully submitted: • ATTEST: ames Mills, Chairperson Robert Koep ke, S retary Linda M. Cal a Tier, Asst.Sec. 0 MINUTES . HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, November 20, 1990 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, Dean Wood, E1Roy Dobratz, Tom Lyke and Chairman Bill Craig. Members absent: Craig Lenz. Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney Barry Anderson. 2. MINUTES Mr. Gruett made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, October 16, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -2 TO C -4 REQUESTED ON THE WALMART PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT The public hearing for the request is to be continued to the December meeting. (b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION The public hearing for the request is to be continued to the December meeting. 4. NEW BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF $5000 CAPITAL EXPENDITURE FOR DETENTION PONDS Building Official Jim Marka commented on the intent of $5000 budgeted for the Comprehensive Plan. The staff discussed using the money to possibly purchase land for detention ponds to develop the Comprehensive Plan. Building Official Jim Marka commented on a low area on Loretta McDonalds land of approximately 5 acres and explained ponding development. Discussion followed on liability of ponds with City Attorney Anderson commenting on the possibilities. Discussion followed on other possibilities pertaining to 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • 11/20/90 drainage problems in the North end of the city. (b) REVIEW WARD HAUGEN SITE PLAN AND PARKING Mr. Ebent asked to abstain from discussion as a Planning Commissioner. Mr. Ward Haugen, owner of CarQuest, commented on the .proposed parking and explained the use of the building at this point. He stated the site will be curbed around the entire site for drainage purposes. Discussion followed on the storm sewers available for drainage and the roof drainage to the South. Building Official commented on the calculation of parking spaces with is determined by use of the building. He stated the building could be a three function building thus making the calculating more difficult. Mr. Roland Ebent, neighboring property owner, voiced his concern as not being with the development of the property but how the development is being accomplished. He stated the property should be platted as suggested by the city attorney's letter of October 11, 1990, and the recommendation of the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. Ebent sited other concerns as follows: * there is no city sewer in the area at this time * easements should be provided for services * subdivision ordinance section regarding conveyance of property * neighboring property owners may sue to stop construction and platting City Attorney Barry Anderson commented on the concerns of Mr. Ebent as follows: * drainage concerns should be addressed before a Certificate of Occupancy is given * City Attorney Anderson addressed the platting concerns and stated the property owners very possibly will begin platting procedures in the near future. However, he explained in his opinion there is not an urgent need to rush into platting since the developers are not ready to sell all the property for a particular use. Building Official Marka stated the Haugen building complies with the zoning ordinance. Platting is for the street right -of -way not the building, he also presented a sketch plan which was completed many years ago. City Attorney Anderson explained the building and use of lot is legal and Mr. Ebent's concerns regarding roadway HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • 11/20/90 and utility easements should be addressed with a binding agreement between the affected property owners and brought to a public hearing. Building Official Marka explained staff indicated a public hearing on a sketch plan regarding roadway and utility easements but the building is not an issue, it is in compliance to code. Mr. Lyndon Gernand, neighboring property owner, asked where the road is to be. Discussion followed on platting procedures to service the adjacent property. There should be an understanding with the developer and property owners for the road and utility easements. Mr. Ebent stated he is concerned with the absence of the platting procedure and the drainage. City Attorney Anderson commented the roadway and utility easements are to be resolved before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Mr. Haugen stated he is working with the city and adjacent property owner. Mr. Marka stated the city is working with the developer and the project is moving in the right direction. Mr. Haugen stated there would be no problem with platting and will work with the city. Chairman Craig stated his understanding of the problem being as follows: 1) The building is in conformance 2) The procedural problems 3) Supply of essential utilities City Attorney Anderson stated the critical issue is to sure that access and utilities are provided. Chairman Craig commented the commission must abide by the recommendation of the City Attorney that there is no violation of procedure and it is important to make progress with the issues. City Attorney Anderson suggests he will present an outline of the formal agreement to address concerns at the December Planning Commission meeting to avoid misunderstanding of previous development. Mr. Ebent commented the agreement should address road and utility easements. E HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • 11/20/90 5. OLD BUSINESS (a) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE Building Official Jim Marka commented on the status of the Zoning Ordinance stating staff will bring back for Planning Commission review in December. (b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Mr. Marka commented on the Comprehensive Plan update. Some discussion followed on the drainage petition regarding McCuen Creek. (c) HWY 7 ADDRESSING (PARR AND 4TH AVE) Building Official Marka commented on staff discussion regarding the addressing system on Hwy 7. Mr. Wood suggested if a change is to be made it would be best changing at the time the county is updating their addressing system. 6. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. 4 NOVEMBER CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL STATEMENT NOVEMBER UE REPORT - GENERAL FUND NOV. YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 948,101.73 1,518,179.00 570,077.27 62.4% LICENSES 189.00 15,036.51 18,950.00 3,913.49 79.3% PERMITS AND FEES 7,905.43 158,887.83 91,300.00 (67,587.83) 174.0% INTER- GOVER'l REVENUE 15,375.59 1,317,322.71 1,476,380.00 159,057.29 89.2% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 46,510.67 441,4355.94 532,699.00 91,263.06 82.9% FINES & FORFEITS 3,934.84 42,141.49 45,500.00 3,358.51 92.6% MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 35,322.52 203,251.09 122,600.00 (80,651.09) 165.8% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 50,300.00 302,290.00 426,000.00 123,710.00 71.0% REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES 744.18 3,681.14 250.00 (3,431.14) 1472.5% TOTAL 160,312.23 3,432,148.44 4,231,858.00 799,709.56 81.1% EXPENSE REPORT GENERAL FUND MAYOR & COUNCIL 1,913.50 38,292.25 36,476.00 (1,816.25) 105.0% CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK 12,201.20 147,995.15 154,200.00 6,204.85 9610% ELECTIONS 1,251.01 8,672.25 7,230.00 (1,442.25) 119.9% FINANCE 16,265.96 219,836.55 237,955.00 18,118.45 92.4% MOTOR VEHICLE 5,853.58 71,663.15 70,835.00 (828.15) 101.2% ASSESSING 20,700.00 20,700.00 20,700.00 0.00 100.0% 6,000.00 38,171.03 41,000.00 2,828.97 93.1% OW TAM NING 109.45 5,867.46 7,800.00 1,932.54 75.2% CITY HALL 3,563.96 36,457.51 43,021.00 6,563.49 84.7% RECREATION BUILDING 2,995.22 43,345.17 58,382.00 15,036.83 74.2% POLICE DEPARTMENT 97,329.53 993,654.81 914,916.00 (78,738.81) 108.6% FIRE DEPARTMENT 5,965.03 116,058.29 109,560.00 (6,498.29) 105.9% SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER 2,371.18 19,901.52 25,213.00 5,311.48 78.9% BUILDING INSPECTION 5,787.68 66,549.76 64,493.00 (2,056.76) 103.2% EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 114.48 632.14 7,698.00 7,065.36 8.2% SAFETY COUNCIL 0.00 0.00 250.00 250.00 0.0% FIRE MARSHALL 3,644.95 44,907.22 47,965.00 3,057.78 93.6% ENGINEERING 17,470.63 216,638.05 234,057.00 17,418.95 92.6% STREETS & ALLEYS 24,496.53 374,059.54 399,123.00 25,063.46 93.7% STREET MAINTENANCE A/C 4,792.57 61,400.84 73,100.00 11,699.16 84.0% LIBRARY 2,841.61 68,976.04 68,996.00 19.96 100.0% SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER 4,731.87 73,894.67 81,291.00 7,396.33 90.9% PARK /REC. ADMIN. 7,749.07 96,464.78 99,496.00 3,031.22 97.0% RECREATION 28,474.70 158,867.37 159,947.00 1,079.63 99.3% CIVIC ARENA 12,102.58 117,765.74 109,753.00 (8,012.74) 107.3% PARK DEPARTMENT 27,560.46 406,309.22 428,262.00 :1,952.78 94.9% CEMETERY 6,058.71 48,651.74 51,708.00 3,056.26 91.1% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3,131.19 35,087.81 32,170.00 (2,917.81) 109.1% CELEBRATE 1990 GRANT 0.00 456.30 0.00 (456.30) ERR DEBT SERVICE 11,952.00 33,952.00 53,287.00 19,335.00 63.7% AIRPORT 2,706.88 204,065.11 53,387.00 (150,678.11) 382.2% 45,530.45 135,623.43 129.784.00 (5,839.43) 104.5% G \SIT GY COUNCIL 1,108.18 5,220.91 14,642.00 9,421.09 35.7% S.C.D.P. COORDINATRO 21,522.07 245,606.11 33,589.00 (212,017.11) 0.0% UNALLOCATED 8,594.78 255,118.78 361,570.00 106,451.22 70.6% TOTAL 416,891.01 4,410,862.70 4,231,856.00 (179,006.70) 104.2% �-7q (5) NOVEMBER CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS 1990 NOVEMBER 2,975.95 ENTERPRISE FUNDS 30.00 2,458.70 2,800.00 341.30 87.8% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 1,042.87 29,757.24 37,200.00 RONUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND NOV. YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE 5,285.41 ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED LIQUOR SALES 33,605.84 375,926.52 435,000.00 59,073.48 86.4% WINE SALES 11,561.09 105,189.52 151,000.00 45,810.48 69.7% BEER SALES 45,199.81 636,684.70 701,400.00 64,715.30 90.8% BEER DEPOSITS (49.17) (1,932.61) 0.00 1,932.61 1,311,159.00 MISC. SALES 2,404.17 40,936.38 40,895.00 (41.38) INTEREST 731.35 7,331.02 6,500.00 (831.02) 112.8% REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 (483.85) 0.00 483.85 0.00 CASH DISCOUNTS (32.34) (949.65) (2,100.00) (1,150.35) 516,400.00 TOTAL 93,420.75 1,162,702.03 1,332,695.00 169,992.97 87.2% EXPENSE REPORT LIQUOR FUND PERSONEL SERVICES 12,390.04 137,983.05 140,959.00 2,975.95 97.9% SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 30.00 2,458.70 2,800.00 341.30 87.8% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 1,042.87 29,757.24 37,200.00 7,442.66 80.0% MISCELLANEOUS 12.00 714.59 6,000.00 5,285.41 11.9% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 208.00 0.00 (208.00) 0.0% TRANSFERS 50,000.00 50,000.00 110,000.00 60,000.00 45.5% C OF SALES 82,957.66 913,460.95 1,017,400.00 103,939.05 89.8% Ca 0.00 0.00 (3,200.00) (3,200.00) 0.0% TOTAL 146,432.57 1,134,582.63 1,311,159.00 176,576.37 86.5% REVENUE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND FEDERAL GRANTS 260,221.00 0.00 (260,221.00) 0.0% WATER SALES 44,675.32 482,338.49 516,400.00 34,061.51 93.4% WATER METER SALES 140.00 4,241.00 6,500.00 2,259.00 65.2% REFUSE SERVICES 52,273.83 455,710.34 441,203.00 (14,507.34) 103.3% REFUSE SURCHARGE 4,599.57 34,095.54 0.00 (34,095.54) SEWER SERVICES 111,862.34 1,361,668.76 1,388,400.00 26,731.24 98.1% PENALTY CHARGES 1,470.24 14,380.05 11,000.00 (3,380.05) 0.0% INTEREST EARNED 4,088.81 97,968.70 160,000.00 62,031.30 61.2% S C 0 R E 0.00 34,020.00 0.00 (34,020.00) REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 107.00 2,973.62 8,000.00 5,026.38 0.0% OTHER 240.00 10,247.88 2,000.00 (8,247.88) 512.4% TOTAL 219,457.11 2,757,865.38 2,533,503.00 (224,362.38) - 108.9% EXPENSE REPORT - WATER SEWER /FUND F. E 58,550.52 540,503.12 452,300.00 (88,203.12) 119.5% WATER 22,438.53 644,175.92 1,019,479.00 375,303.08 63.2% SEWER 38,337.04 1,140,623.79 1,658,117.00 517,493.21 68.8% WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT. 0.00 1,989.84 0.00 (1,989.84) TOTAL 119,326.09 2,327,292.67 3,129,896.00 802,603.33 74.4% NOVEMBER REVENUE REPORT CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1990 NOVEMBER YOUTH CENTER - "DPY DOCK" NOV. YEAR TO BALANCE PERCENTAGE ACTUAL DATE ACTUAL BUDGET RE51AINING USED MEMBERSHIPS 64.00 634.00 2,000.00 1,366.00 31.7% ADMISSIONS 325.00 4,360.00 7,200.00 2,840.00 60.6% VIDEO GAMES 0.00 0.00 800.00 800.00 0.0% POP 192.00 1,429.29 3,600.00 2,170.71 39.7% CANDY 105.75 909.47 3,600.00 2,690.53 25.3% CHIPS, ETC. 224.86 2,683.49 1,200.00 (1,483.49) 223.6% INTEREST 0.00 382.03 1,000.00 617.97 38.2% BLDG RENTS 50.00 155.00 0.00 (155.00) FUND RAISERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 46,550.00 48,000.00 1,450.00 97.0% TOTAL 961.61 57,103.28 67,400.00 10,296.72 84.7% EXPENSE REPORT PERSONEL SERVICES 1,887.50 24,050.11 27,803.00 3,752.89 86.5% OPERATING SUPPLIES 272.01 3,270.96 G,800.00 3,529.04 48.1% OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 2,514.90 30,004.86 33,300.00 3,295.14 90.1% MISCELLANEOUS 0.00 307.28 1,500.00 1,192.72 20.5% CAPITAL OUTLAY 0.00 591.60 (591.60) TOTAL 4,674.41 58,224.81 69,403.00 11,178.19 83.9% YOUTHCTR ATTENDANCE NOV. Y.T.D 21 DATES 742 7,716 • HUTCH BASEBALL ASSN (Legion) (One -Time Raffle) City of Hutchinson • FFE: $25.00 APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE Approved by: Building Fire Application shall be submitted at Police least days prior to the Gambling occasion 4 I, _ 51 2 / n C' �iC/ AND 1, 1iame 7f Authorized Officer of Na^e of Designated Gambling Organization Manager Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game of gamblingin accordance with the provisions of the City of Hutchison Ordinance 11 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 for the license year ending � 5i atures �1 / A . G c Auth ized Officer of Organization Designated Gambling Manager of organization A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization:_ / • 1. True Name: ���lG✓1� 5�i 2 �j /_�/L / /�/C� (:. v, (last) (f•r t) middle) pE0 i330 V � 2, Residence Address: %7 n /6F /mil ,� JA v ( tre t) (city) (statj) (zi ) c s `c� 3. Date of Birth: S ,6 4. Place of Birth,�fdG +r� /� /t" (mofday year) (city /state) 5. Have you ever been convicte of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No If Yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manage: of organization: 1. True Name: JJP( \JL'1 ?mil � ac / /l� 2. (last) _ ( �, (��p ) Residence Address: SIIt��7LlDL'i /�� stree ) 3. Date of Birth: S Z 4. (mo /day year) (city) (state Place of Birth:/ 1 z3P) (city /state) 4—k. 5. Have you ever been convicted of aryy crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No ,/ If yes, explain 6. how long have you been a member of the organization? r—r 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you gambling manager. C. Game Information: 1. Place where gambling devices will be used 2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used (date and /or day(s) 3. Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: of week) From A. F'. To — A. M. P.M. P. 91. 4. Maximum number of players 5. Will pr- be paid in money or merchandise? 6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? Yes No . If so, will a charge be made for such refreshments? Yes NO D. Organization Information: 1. Address where regular meetings are held C�/c �LUb 2. Day and time of meetings 7, Z''e zll�% - 3. Is the applicant organizati� organized under the laws of t:e State of Minnesota? Yes No 4. How long has the organization been inexistence? 4a. How many members in the organization? 5. What is the purpose of the organization 6. Officers of the Organization: Name Address Title iJ,P � �i ✓c� ��y � � 53 ,fu�ic e> � 7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: Name Address Title pp • • • D. Organization Information: (Continued) 8. In whom cu tody will organization records be kept? Name � I a � Address i 9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by players while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed premises, please state the Dame of Insurer and Policy No. 10. Have you (Manager 8 Officer) read, and do you thoroughly understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices q "e5 11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization. E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization. 1. Name of bonding company 2. Address of bonding company 3. Amount and duration of bond 4. Application is hereby ade for waiver of the bonding requirements. Yes No I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling, and I will familiarize myself with the contents thereof. Signature of authorized officer of organization Date: Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of 19 Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of 19 Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on Social Security Number: ILN Business ID Number: Hutch Hockey Ass `,� 1i.. O'Tooles JAN2.�_i \ / City of Hutchinson FEE: $25.00 APPLICATION FOR GA14BLING DEVICES LICENSE Approved by: Building Fire _ Application shall be submitted at Police least days prior to the Gambling occasion �t ( If - \+ Krlc r ( AND I, Name of Authorized Officer of Nam o Designated Gambling Organization Manager Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game ofgamblirgin accordance with the provisions of the City of Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 31,9 for the license year ending Off? I *iature.9- Author )i ed Pfficer of Organization DesignaVed Gambling Manager of organization A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization: Is 1. True Name: Kr10r r C I It) tcr-, (last) (first) (middle) 2. Residence Address: 3 ,�S CU /1n C fi c,(4 k . 14 , L � h , i) Sr /n . %,;� 5. (street) (city) (state) (zi ) 3. Date of Birth: - aq- `/�c 4• Place of Birt h A N, (mo /day /year) (city /state) 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No _�_ If Yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manage: of organization: 1. True Name: L1. hr IPn T�C,thr.irl �' IC2 n z_ (last) (first) (middle) 2. Residence Address: 5L1� HL (street) /1 }�[.c1c..h n`x -n 121 A) S� 3 S (street) (city) (state) (zip) 3. Date of Birth: 'j`i 4. Place of Birtb: L r',: n A Ftl , (mo /day /year) (city /state) / 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a J traffic offense? Yes No X If -yes, explain 6. How long have you been member of the organization? SL e 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you gambling manager. C. Game Information: 1. Place where gambling devices will be used Tc G I e 5 2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used 1nG/S. �r sCt' (date and /or day(s) 3. Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: of week) From i-I: co A.M. To I :c�u A, ThUrs days Fr (.M) P.M. 4. Maximum number of players Xd Ma x, 5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? M of�CT 6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? Yes X No If so, will a charge be made for such refreshments? Yes D. Organization Information: 1. Address where regular meetings are held Pld)hc L. - h (_,1 Ll 2. Day and time of meetings (St 1{(eS 1 f 7�fn 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of tr. State of Minnesota? Yes _ CX No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? PQ r 4a. How many members in the organization? 13 5 5. What is the purpose of the organization? H Elp JCL4T1\ J)CC.Ke 6. Officers of the Organization: P N e r 5 Name Address Title G n+ knc rr 3 -)5 Ccmefi c.ct C. E . o 5&5 -3rA Avz SU) Treeisccr 7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: Name Address Title u D. Organization Information: (Continued) 8. In whose custody will organization records be kept? Name /c)0 / Address - Ja4,2 MCC / 9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by players while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed premises, please state the Name of Insurer 1 and Policy No. 10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices' `JAS +11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization. E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization. 1. Name of bonding company Tr'i - S t 1n5u: c-'inc e (J !}t IJ 2. Address of bonding company 1 - Round «!,nd &M - Lei w-rn F MIJ 5 0/5 3. Amount and duration of bond !Q5 pr.C) ef�c unt; I 3an r9 `i '�- Q. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding requirements. Yes No I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling, and I will familiarize mCsv with t4 thereof. ure/y1 \aytnorized orilcer of organitzaLaon Date: // 7 S bscribed and sworn to b for me notary - public on this % day of I k -... ...a9 i -.';v J Sli°. Si natur o Notary Public N .i. .. ":.- r,:innesot: k • .. 1 I}i ... • cow.ly Commission expires on � - 23 -9/ N.Y 7 u scribe$ s�`n�'swo� be ore me no ry public on this day of ,, tC 19 ...� Siknatur�' Notary Public itlliie ';•�;. - +innesacY Commission expires on WA I lA Linty . •. , j �� ...:. Esp. 82191 "Sociaecur 11N Business ID Number: PO APPLICATION FOR ..... ....... STAND ........... PERMIT To the ...... .. Ci,ty .. Counci .......... ................... .... . ... . ....... ..... . ... . .......................... . ............................................................................................................................ of the . .............. .. ....... �Aty. ....... ............................... of . ........ RVU.N.mu .... ... ...................... ...................................... in the County of McLeod ............... .... ....... ..... .............. .................. State of X innesota: 831 Second Ave Southwest The undcrsilned ow7zer whose address w ............_..__ . . . .. ... ............... . .... . ... ........... - .. ................ . ...... .......... ...... t, J4A, Hutchinson MN 55350 k ..... - ............ . .................. I ..... ....................... ...... ............. .................................... ... .. ... .... hereby applies for a perm' to Z, .... I 4� A* operate a Popcorn Stand at the southwest corner of the Public Sq r Lo 40 ........... � .11 ................................ _..........I............. .............................................. .............................................. ....... ... ......... ......... ...... ....... S upon that cv-fizin tract of land dvecrtbed as follows: Lot .... .... .. Block plat ndd ................... ... ...... address ..................... ...... .. .... ....... .. ....... .... ..... .... whi.i,h- .3 of the joZlowiny size and area; width....... . . ..... ... f eet; UnVh a l1c, . ........ . ..... ... --- .................. .. . ... ..... ... .......... ..... ... ..... I ........... ........ .......... ...... ... ...... * .... .... hcrfbu a that, in case such permit is (ranted, that all work which shall be do?w and all materials . which shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor herew submitted cnd with all the ordinances of said ................................... Ci ty .............. -- ............................ 1.4 ........ .... .. ........................ - ....... . ..................... ...... applicable thereto. • Irplicant further aireei to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specified as follows: $50.00 Fee for One Year .................. ................................................................................................................................. . .......... ....... . ...... ..... ......... ................................ ....... Mark M66 aLLer TO LU --- CITY —CYJUCIL .0 WMINSON . ... ... ­., 0060 Of XIA131 The und"Ined owner whose ad to . ............ .................... I . ...... . . ............ alwim tor a Perna to.. _-.pLm AND RV SOW KITH . . ........... ...... U PM that "rimin tract of land daseibed m fallowt: BIOPA.._ plat addition . .......... ....... .............. .. ....... ...... __ ..... .... ...... ... . ...... addr ... . ....... .... .. . . . . . .. .................. which Is of a foli,,Inj Bice an d area; width fad; lasigh'._ ..... ....... . ...... ..... .. feel; area WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS ­ . � . I., . ­­1 ......... . ....... .. ............ ... . ............... .... .................... ..... ........ .. ........... ....... ...... ............. .. . . ...... . .. .. and hereby alrees that, In caw such permit is (ranted, that all work which @hall be done and all , naterlak which &Wl be wed *hall 0 WIM the plane and speafteafign, 0,,rfe, herewith #Ubm"Ud and with all as ordinance, of eald _.CIT,y applicable thersto. JPPUMN4 further ajfrm to PaV fM or ageemionsaft of as flow and in a aw ." 8 4 jpw jjW , " follow: $1.00 .. . . ...... . APPLICATION FOR-EN-Ow tMOVA_L_j?FjUUT /a the Of the = . .... . . ................. jLLqgjjNS0N ON county Of .............MC 190.0_: ............. . ...... ................. 8060 of minnew": The uAddrs4ma owner whose addraw I . ........... .. ............ _1 pp lW f & perms 0 . Ppq!i _AND . _ ..... REMOVE --- �SNOW WITH t 101;'b - •1 — 1. / V , , z I . . .. . . ...................... "POR that Ctriai& grad of land described as follows: Lot . ... .. ....... .. ..... _ . ....... ; Block............_.......___.. .. Plot or addition . ... ... . addrow ........... ....... . .... . ......... . .. . ..... which I, of th f S i m an d arm; width fat; lesigh . .... ....... . .... ........ feel, area ....WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS ........ . ... .. .......... . . and hereby agrees that, in c a m #Im perm I, j,anted, that all work wMA &% b d one an d a ll mateyialA which &hall be used &hall comply with the Plane and p.,iflo th h u b n i t t e d and with all the ardi&arueae o f m id ...CITY ... 0. HRIT..C. H. I.N.SON ------- ............ ...... . .......... applicable ameve& )olio wv '" plioank f urther a "" 10 PV fm or aemennenis 01 Of UPW and in 04 GASOUnte ipocilled $1.00 ....... . ... I ........... . .... ....... ........ ........ . . ....... . ..... . . . ..... ....... pwwsr HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT 205 Third Avenue South East HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 12/12190 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: BRAD EMANS, FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS FOR 1991 I request that the frefioters fisted below be appointed to these positions: Fro Chief Brad T. Emans . lot Asst. Chief Randy Redman 2nd Asst. Chief Steve Schramm City Lt, Bob Vierya Ladder Lt. Joe Drahos Read Lt. Tom Pessek Rescue Lt. Jeff Dobratz Secrawry Bob Schantzen Treasurer Gory Henke ., #-0 .._.. .., City Lt, Bob Vierya Ladder Lt. Joe Drahos Read Lt. Tom Pessek Rescue Lt. Jeff Dobratz Secrawry Bob Schantzen Treasurer Gory Henke ., #-0 E Page 1 of 2 PROPOSED IMPROVFMEMr PRwECr ES7 mm 1991 CONS7RDCTIOV SEASON Nutchinson,'Minnesota e t- Pro- Project Construction Expenses Project City Est[- City Est[- State Assessed Ling ject Description Cost Estimate Cost muted Share/ mated Share/ Estimated Estimated NO. No. Estimate Estimate Other Funds Bonded Share Share 1 "91 -01 GLEN STREET & 1ST AVE SW Utility & Street $ 185,000 $ 37,000 $ 222,000 - - - $158,000 - - - $ 72,088 Parking Lot $ 27.500 $ 5,00 $ 33,000 $33,000 - - - - - - - -! Alley $ 15,500 $ 3, 00 $ 18,600 - - - $ 12,680 - - - $ 6,00IR 1 Sub -Total $ 228.000 $ 45, 00 $ 273.600 $ 33. off 1 $152 off - _1 78,/00 2 91 -02 DELAWARE STREET $ 48.000 $ 9.600 $ 67,600 - - - $ 9,600 - - - $ 40, ON Utility Improvements 3 91 -03 DOWNTOWN SPRINKLING $ 120.000 _ 24,000 $ 144,000 $144,000 2 - - - - - - $ ? -? ? 4 91 -04 HASSAN STREET (5th Ave SE to Oakland Ave) $ 160,000 $ 32,000 $ 192,000 - - - $ ; 1 01000 - Storm Sewer and Street Improvements 4 91 -05 IVY STREET (Oakland Ave to 6th Ave SE) $ 25,000 $ 5,000 $ 30,000 - - $ 51000 - - - $ 25,000 Storm Sewer and Street Improvements 4 91 -06 6TH AVENUE SE (Hassan St to Jefferson St) $ 22,000 $ 4,400 $ 26,400 - - - $ 6,400 - - - $ 20,000' Street Improvements _4 Sub -Total $ 207,000 $ 41, $ 248,400 - - - $ 31„400 - - - $ 217,000 5 91 -07 CENTURY AVENUE(Bradford St.to TH 15 S) S A $ 154,000 $ 30,800 $ 184,800 - - - - - - $ 64,800(MS.4) $ 120,000 Street and Utility Improvements 6 91 -08 5TH AVENUE NE (TH 7 to Bluff Street) M S A $ 52,000 $ 10,400 $ 62,400 -- - - $ 14,000 $ 18,400(MSA) $ 30,000 Watermain and Street Improvements 91 -09 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS M S A Lynn Rd from Madson Ave to S Grade Rd $ 27,000 $ 5,400 $ 32,400 - -• $ 5,400 $ 27',000(MSA) - - - TH 15 North $ 13,000 $ 21600 $ 15,600 - - - $ 15;600 - - - - - 5 Sub -Total $ 246,000 $ 49,200 $ 295,200 - - - $ 35.000 $110,2904ASAJ $ 150,000 1 OOIRITOYN PARTIN6 /T.I.F. FUND 2 NCOC FUNDS /SORE CITY FUNDS NAY BE REQUIRED 3 STREET DEPARTNENT BUDGET 4 ROBOT PROJECT /CITY COORDINATION ONLY 5SNMNO T.I.F. FUND INPROEST.91 - Revision Date - January 3, 1991 Page 2 of 2 PRO POSED INPROV PRQ7ECT ESTINAmE 1991 C0NS7RW770N SEASON Hutchinson, Nimmsota ,- t- Pro- Project Construction Experjsee Project C.1ty Esa- city Estl- Staty Assessed ^9 ject Description Cost Estimate Cost mated Share vested SYaere EstLwstard EstLwatard No. No. Estimate Estimate Other funds 8ovrded Share !1_ Share __ 6 91 -10 SCHMIOTBAUER'S 4TH ADDITION - Phase 1 $ Utility and Street Improvements 6 91 -12 WAGNER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PLAT - Phase 2 $ Utility and Street Improvements 6 Sub -Total $ 166.000 $ 33,200 i $ 199,200 - - - i 72,000 $ 14,400 $ 86,400 - - - 238.000 50,000 47 600 S s 2856.00 $ 169,400 $ 86,400 10 91 -11 COMPTON- ANDERSON (Colorado St & Carolina Ave) $ 91 -13 WAL -MART SUBDIVISION - Utility /Street Improv. $ 70,500 $ 14,100 $ 84,600 - - $ 10,600 - _ $ 74,000 50,000 $ PADEN FIRST ADDITION- Street Improvements $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 7 91 -14 SUNSET RIDGE (Westwood Rd & Connecticut St) $ 11.500 $ 2;300 $ 13,000 - - - - - - - - - $ 18,800 Pave Wear Course _7 Sub -Total $ 132,000 $ 26,400 158,400 - - - S 10,600 - - - $ 147,8010 _9 91 -15 CRACK SEALING 19,500 - -_ - $ 19,500 t 19,500 3 - - - - - - - - Q Q1 -16 MATN STRFFT !TH 1S1 STnpl Tr WTS t 192 man 4 t 190 see 4 t1 9a ae1!laaaaMTl 10 91 -11 COMPTON- ANDERSON (Colorado St & Carolina Ave) $ 192,000 $ 38,'400 $ 230,400 - - - - - - $ 290,400 Utility and Street Improvements (Proposed, Not Yet Platted) 10 91 -17 Golfview Court (Proposed, Not Yet Platted) $ 50,000 $ 10,1000 $ 60,000 - - - - - - - - - $ 60,000 10 Su b -Total $ 242,000 S 48;400 S 290.400 - - - - - - - - - S 290.400 0 ALSO TO BE DONE IN 1991: 15 90 -25 DEMOLITION IN DOWNTOWN SHOPKO SITE S S i S 1 O0111T041 PARAINGIT.I.F. FUND " CDC FUNOS/SONE CITY FUNDS RAY BE REQUIRED THEY DEPARTMENT BUDGET 4 NoNT PROJECT /CITY COORDINATION OKY 6 SN "O T.I.F. FUND INPROEST.91 - RevisionlDate - January 3, 1991 t V, 800 $110,200(N9A) PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADlIR 011 THURSDAY, DSCI0I = 2718, 19909 AND ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 3RD 1991. • NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 1 PROJECT NO. 91 -01 Publication No. 4185 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 8th day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of Glen Street from Washington Avenue to 2nd Avenue S.W. and 1st Avenue S.W. from Glen Street to Franklin Street by the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing, Sidewalk and Appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $195,600.00, with an estimated $78,000.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $273,600.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. • Dated: December 17th, 1990 , CVAU 4 6 City AdA&istrat PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS REARINiG, WBBTHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT POOR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. • RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9400 LETTING NO. 1 PROJECT NO. 91 -01 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of December, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of Glen Street from Washington Avenue to 2nd Avenue S.W. and 1st Avenue S.W. from Glen Street to Franklin Street by the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, surfacing, sidewalk and appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, ten days published notice of the hearing through two weekly Publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of January, 1991, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 11th.day of December, 1990. 2. John P. Rodeberg is herby designated as the Engineer for this Improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. • Adopted by the Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator • A S H U T C P U B L I C cas'- C.E` ROGE.RS ?RAS. TREASl RER 0 • January 2, 1991 1 H I N S S C P 0 O N 0 L S CCUGL +S KP.N 4G 'VICE CHAiF.MAN EC'..J E FA- t.'ETC 7 n- �IOR S*14 RUFF, D,PECTCR ci Hutchinson City Council % Gary Plotz, City Administrator City Hall Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: January 8, 1991 Public Hearing - Project #91 -01 Dear-Council Members: This is to inform you that the Hutchinson School Board strongly urges the city to proceed with the improvements of Glen Street as outlined in Project No. 91 -o1. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sinc ely, Superintendent Glenn Matejka for the Hutchinson School Board cc: Gary Plotz John Rodeberg "A23. i h »? First avenue S W Hutchinson, Minn. 55150 Jnnuary 2. 1991 Mr Gnry Plot? City Administr -tor Hutchinson. Mn 55150 qir: Referring to vour N of Hearing, Letting No. 1, Project No 91 -01 Publication No. 4185 I have this to say: I am living on my Social Security Check of $500 plus dollars and -e-m in ill health -- Arthritus and also Parkinson's Disease (for the rest of my life) and of nenessi w helre high medical bills every month - I am unable to work and have no other income. Of neneseity I am getting fuel assistance thru Heartland Community Action Agency. Inc. Mid -Town Flaza, 310 South Fir s t Street, Box 1359, Willmar, MN 56201. Put me down as being absoliutel AGAINST THE PROJECT . I think the iquoated price for the assessments of the residents along this project is outrageous -- especially in these "hard times.. There are only seven people involved -- the rest is public probdrty (school and city)-- why should we as lay - people be required- to pay such a large sum? I AM AGAINST THE PROJECT Iam unable to attend the meeting So this lettdr will have to suffice. I have a good sidewalk and fairly new copper water pipe up to the street -- so if you damage the se items there will be some hell raisin- - from me. Yours David 4i . Tewes • 7, PUBLISHED IN THE BUTaMLWN LEADER ON TBURSDAY DBC== 2TT0 1990, AND Of TBORSDAY, JANUARY 3RD 1991. NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 91 -02 Publication No. 4186 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 8th day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of Delaware Street by the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Lift Station and Appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $9,600.00, with an estimated $48,000.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $57,600.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: December 17th, 1990 A�4: City Adm stra PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS REARING, WAR YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORM OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. 0 — RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9401 LETTING NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 91 -02 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of December, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of Delaware Street by the construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Lift Station and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly Publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of January, 1991, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 11th day of December, 1990. 2. John P. Rodeberg is herby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 0 "One January 7, 1991 City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, M 55350 RE: Delaware Street Assessment Project #91 -02 ATIN: Gary Plotz and City Council Dear Mr. Plotz; ��23456) d4 � z On December 31, 1990 my wife and I purchased the property located at 1318 Delaware. When we purchased the property it was with the understanding that the private sewer system on this property did not meet city, county, or state codes. We are responsible for either the cost of city sewer and water or would be required to install a new private mound system when weather permits. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that my wife and I are in favor of the city sewer and water project. Even if a new private system is installed on our property it is our that it will not be the long term solution for any of the homes located on Delaware St. The cost of city sewer and water will not be cheaper in the future and now would be the appropiate time to make this kind of improvment to our homes. Respectfully, Nghia and Cang Nguyen PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 2718 1990 AM OR THURSDAY, JANUARY 3RD, 1991. NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 91 -07, 91 -08, 91 -09 Publication No. 4187 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 8th day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of : PROJECT NO. 91 -07: Century Avenue from 150' West of Bradford Street to T.A. 15 South by the Construction of Storm Sewer, Drain Tile, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -08: 5th Avenue N.E. from T.H. 7 to Bluff Street by the Construction of Trunk Watermain Extension, Service Reconstruction, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -09: Lynn Road from Madson Avenue to South Grade Road and T.H. 15 North, north of Fifth Avenue on the west side of Maplewood Academy by the Construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances; pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area Proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $22 with an estimated $247,200.00 Minnesota State Aid Cost and an estimated $26,000.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $295,200.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: December 17th, 1990 City Admi strat PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. 0 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9402 LETTING NO. 5 PROJECT NO. 91 -07, 91 -08, 91 -09 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of December, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of: Project No. 91 -07: Century Avenue from 150' West of Bradford Street to T.H. 15 South by the construction of Storm Sewer, Drain Tile, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 91 -08: 5th Avenue N.E. from T.H. 7 to Bluff Street by the construction of Trunk Watermain Extension, Service Reconstruction, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 91 -09: Lynn Road from Madson Avenue to South Grade Road and T.H. 15 North, north of Fifth Avenue on the west side to Maplewood Academy by the construction of Sidewalk and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of January, 1991, at which all persons desiring to be heard • were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 11th day of December, 1990. 2. John P. Rodeberg is herby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 0 6 • 11K H U T C H I P U B l I C S N S O N C H O O L S GECRGE GCPDON. CHAIRMAN COJGLAS KENNING. VICE CHAiRVAN CO' +A_D POPP, CLERK BC•.'+IE BAUYETZ. DIRECTOR RCGERSTEARNS. TREASURER SARA RUFF. DIRECTOR cc: Gary Plotz John Rodeberg Dick Lennes January 2, 1991 'NSD C- Hutchinson City Council % Gary Plotz, City Administrator City Hall Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: January 8, 1991 Public Hearing - Project 191 -07 Dear Council Members: This is to inform you that the Hutchinson School Board is supportive of the upgrading of Century Avenue as outlined in Project 191 -07. Thank you for your consideration. Sinc ely, Glenn Matejka, Superintendent for the Hutchinson School Board cc: Gary Plotz John Rodeberg Dick Lennes PUBLISHED IN THE BUrCDI " LRADER ON THURSDAY, DE>CENIM 27TH 1990, AND on THURSDAY, JANUARY 3RD 1991. U NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 91 -10, 91 -12 Publication No. 4188 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.N. on the 8th day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of : PROJECT NO. 91 -10: Elks Drive and Sherwood Street from Century Avenue to 300' South of Elks Drive in Schmidtbauers 4th Addition by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -12: 8th Avenue S.W. from Graham Street to Wagner Street and Wagner Street in Wagner Development Corporation Plat by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base and Appurtenances; and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area Proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. • The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $29 with an estimated $255,800.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of $285,600.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: December 17th, 1990 E s _M: City Admini rator PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9403 LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NO. 91 -10, 91 -12 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of December, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of: Project No. 91 -10: Elks Drive and Sherwood Street from Century Avenue to 300' South of Elks Drive in Schmidtbauers 4th Addition by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances; Project No. 91 -12: 8th Avenue S.W. from Graham Street to Wagner Street and Wagner Street in Wagner Development Corporation Plat by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of January, 1991, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 11th day of December, 1990. 2. John P. Rodeberg is herby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator 11 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 9404 LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 91 -13, 91 -14 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 11th day of December, 1990, set a date for a hearing on the improvement of: Project No. 91 -13: Wal -Mart Subdivision by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Appurtenances; and Baltimore Avenue and Boston Street in Paden First Addition by the Construction of Bituminous Base and Wear Course and Appurtenances; Project No. 91 -14: Westwood Road and Connecticut Street from Hilltop Lane to Shady Ridge Road by the Construction of Bituminous Wear Course and Appurtenances; AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on the 8th day of January, 1991, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1- Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 11th day of December, 1990. 2. John P. Rodeberg is herby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Mayor City Administrator • PUBLISHED IN THE 807M ON LEADER ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 27TH, 1990 AND ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 311D, 1991. NOTICE OF HEARING LETTING NO. 7 PROJECT NO. 91 -13, 91 -14 Publication No. 4189 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the 8th day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of : PROJECT NO. 91 -13: Wal -Mart Subdivision by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Appurtenances; and Baltimore Avenue and Boston Street in Paden First Addition by the Construction of Bituminous Base and Wear Course and Appurtenances; PROJECT NO. 91 -14: Westwood Road and Connecticut Street from Hilltop Lane to Shady Ridge Road by the Construction of Bituminous Wear Course and Appurtenances; and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice. The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $10,600.00, with an estimated $147 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of ;158,400.00. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Dated: December 17th, 1990 &_4t �ok City Admin trato PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION. 0 E i i I TELEPHONE (612; 252.8464 J4htS9i RECFIVFD West Division St. or P.O. Box 1225 St. Cloud. Minn. 56302 Date t9 i <G c E! ✓) Per % tCt i C ke • C' . I y • "� •; et /t sQlL y Zt` 4 `' IL -of' e l , le Ze X61Y11a- ll AL i <G c E! ✓) Per K i ) ' . / ; -epr. % tCt i C ke > K i ) ' . / ; -epr. `I nlls I N5 I i r • r ° r s FE i .1 r�ae --' g ° roc r S i -� • 4 d ° - - -_zt • 1 s 17 x 5 - 1 6 w 1 r � to 1 tz N 10, /e Proj. 91 -01 f -— ND AVE. 9 u 7 6e 6 f6 It.i FIRST t— W W at H 3 4 5 32 AVE ° 32 ° 1 .32 I 9 2 ° 8 ° 3 e 7 l o b ca WASHINGTON SECOND 9 AVENUE M- S I s Io 1 �I Io 82 9 0 8 e 7 ° 6 -- ° 4. NORTHW 132 to ° e 9 W W 7 H � N i • • /// �4t RS • KS NS B 10 e 9 0 S 8 • 7 Z e J ° 6 Y a SOUTH ES Is.s sz u- • 10 . 9 8 7 � 6 SOUTHWEST. 10 _ �OTnL CS COS i a 1.0 Paz JM P1Tl SLY.COL SHI¢c * 2a,hcc e 9 2 3 Z ui z,e«. a35oo � e 630 zc-ca Scevvt �, 2 �0 �S ,QO 0 6 5 $ /LOT 132 Est NORTH PARK ° o FIRST AVE ae op oz °PAJ IAIJ$ 1I L i 2 PARK ClEM6&rARy 8 3 7 4 SECOND 9 AVENUE M- S I s Io 1 �I Io 82 9 0 8 e 7 ° 6 -- ° 4. NORTHW 132 to ° e 9 W W 7 H � N i • • /// �4t RS • KS NS B 10 e 9 0 S 8 • 7 Z e J ° 6 Y a SOUTH ES Is.s sz u- • 10 . 9 8 7 � 6 SOUTHWEST. 10 O, paw CCU Cos- a ♦ 57 rood to � s4 � Ocp �C / �LSYni7ED) I 3 �N �ECr 91 -02 CJ I. 19 24o.o8 D�j 9 q�9 �o R 5 :•>> S 3 App;Tla O aD In 3146 W (OE FEYY�y' 0 l HOSPITAL f :40. - 01 1 i25,01 ersz 0 " c I HUT;,HINSON AREA VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 1 V - bq,goo r�3n 120 000 Ho�YTgL + 14 Aoo HTG f poo G.Y[Cu C^nr 1° Ib, 000 o t' .. I �D r J i .s s �f "4 ~vFaL��ar / ri � /� / 8 / � ' o • �2tl y / 2 Jp r w b 9 �'' 2 PE 0 b I � � \1` � � His �•r�qs � b �a CJ b 6 � � 2 b 3 3 L� ' " . Q 4� \ P n co " 7 4_. .w. g fie` o J r ...__ 74, 00 7 ro o u. I � I 3D $ 13a - - - - -- -- 1 6 I 6 1 5 7 2 ' 5 2 7 W RG S — Iao I o is s ;c �Lu 2 n> 23 1 • "u A u I 3 _HI ►— r 41 4 H i ^' 3 2 6 `�' 3 9 W ;car —J 22 L 1 . 2 NrB RG 1 4 AD ITION IONS a 2 ' 2 II e 5 4 Y 10 21 3 I 3 Q °' 3 I 3 NY RG58 2 I _ I 7 -- ' 1- e 2 ° AD ITION7 3 SEC D 4 Q 23 6 - -- 4 4 I __ I • 8 5 6 12 ADDITI 19 5 5 r3: 5n 13a 5 5 GRIFFIN 147 10 "' 315 ' I rev r0 60 IB a1: 6 AVENUE A I e 1 10 �� 17 I 2 9 1 10 1 10 2 9 j I " 3 2 9 2 9 16 8 e " 8 w 3 I 8 II Y 4 T 3 8 8 3 9 15 9 V .f e3 a tr N I I 5 I 4 4 7 ' 14 I0 k IL 5 6 to I b 5 r N k _ 3 1 I R " E I3 It COLLEGE AVENUE A 12 6 10 I I a 132 132 b 12 I 9 - -- I 1 - 10 'x1' 1120 33 Q 2 2 9 a T 6P 13 2 9 6 t 8 S I I 3 9 • 3 9 "" ,o ` 4 E T 4 4 14 r 7 9 5G ` 4 7 9 • 3 1)1 132 "' 6R v v R' 1 t0 m 2 132 - I z so IJ 1322 so � "I'S 6 10 4 y 1 s McLEOD 2 0 " AVENUE 9 66 el6 616 ' ��' j6 II 3 f 195 - x'1 4 0 eo 633 •e.x s6 4 b 12 6 • in Y I C E, H I d M b66 6 ry 6 r / a \ r '66 6 5 . 10 9 ,'� 1 s C DI T RS D �` \\ e 4 1 4r OF z T • 6 Rl K 'e z > eo 4 " 6 I e3 xr /y 1 5 W EST " F Io �C 3 n " 1 �� 2 1 a w e e 504 I « 2 � . = AVENUE 3 4 9 Pro 91 -09 ?� 5 J 3 60 Y + I ; 2656 12 5 4 3 2 t a r 6 7 4 7 4 9 80 7 6 5 6 5 O l 66 120 ]] ! �6 7 � • '4 9i 10�" _ i ,•, a+ MILWAUKEE so u5.5 120.5 120.5 1266 28 ' AVENUE �2 9 I to i to I F- W W cr F- N i 6 C 6oG 575 9 5 4 _ S 9 2 600 600 600 600 5915 2%75 I " 7 87 W W G: 84 0 , 0 60G 6BG 6B0 69A N 6 2 e 575 9 280 l S 9 2 3 m 4 2 g 3 8 8 I " 7 W W w W W G: 3 e 7 4 S 7 4 n w 1 5 e 6 1 66 5 6 5 e 6 g 6 5 M6 1165 1265 19&5 126! 1205 i 6655 MILLER 13 12 M I 1. ) 3 8 M I w _ 1 e H W O U! k i IM IF 10 126.5 I 575 ! 8 3 e e 7 4 F !).! 3 2 I 5 8 3 30 Ir 6e E < to s 7 4 w 1 5 e 6 1 W O U! k i IM IF 10 126.5 I 9 2 8 3 e e 7 4 6 120.$ 5 3 6 i 1205 X265 It to I g 9 2 Z LINDEN 5 8 3 30 Ir 6e E < to s 7 4 !20 5 e 6 !o s 66 1265 6 1 0.5 i .3DD1r1 I e LINDEN 1a oe 66 6e E < .0 100 !20 126.5 » I !o s X223— s 20 I e I = AVENUE i _16 15 66 19 2 12U4 r 040 050 , SO )SD 150 050 1�OG I I T 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 �S e 3 14 S � e 3 2i 18 18 3 x 122. T 8 IVI 4 13 8 4 - ^" 17 4 22.16 12 719 S S IS 14 13 12 II 10 I 5 - 5 J 9 = 16 5 2.1 $ II - 6 1r e 6 1664 fd $ LYNDALE AVE. 15 6 s 10 7 or W 0 e 0 20.0 50 go 0 060 1 '� 7 9 e 16 _ 17 ADDI 18 10 W 19 20 ° ° 21 14 7 e - a 1 %.6 1925 g 22 13 a w `V "' I 1 2 1100 IIl 0 3 e AD0. I 12 9 �J '( 18 2 - . _ o 111 aL 1450 3030 Q_ 211.06 F 10 7" I AVENUE 7950 206 220.0 AN [ Mt C IL Q _ 38 : • 9�� �'`�'} 17 �F", r 23 , / p1, ,0 0 3 32 11 VA % 4 y ' °$ 24 s 34 ' 33 �'6 15 14 101. It AVENUE e a 6 4 raN •Y rY oaY nY m.m oo.m woo Ie m 1 s +° S H M I D BADE 'S Y SG IA ♦U l SCHMID BADER E 1; 2 0 3 , 4 7 Q a 7 t 111 ! • 3 2 1 8 i SEC " FIRST ADD. THI D ADD. D. \ X1 s Y.I I'm Ia." 1 • la 1 GYM - to elsoe o 2 ! ADDITION OUTIOT iCHARD PARK A n 2 PARK FIRST " ADDITION 2 w N0.00 • 4M A IHr + An0 �Il �� +5 m V 0 u. r r 0 E , so, 'loon loo.°° 100.00 ft oo 10 5o.'* woo f000 90.00 s0.00 sow 123.64 e0 L3. w.° k N T r 8 OS yj ,1 m u A W 0.01- 101.11 N 3 y WA NF_R $ c0 eo 00 90A0 so 00 00.00 6000 60.00 l2 O o � � 95 rz r1., KAY S I,OVO STR DOD J p • '1.0.00 9LOi ° e s o J S :°.°° rn R $ 1 ° i.000° o - s _ ° u 111.13 ,0.1• 'O. — .G 8 �z000 8 C 'o�10 u'sT xV .,0.00 N o � ? g = m : o ,�, ez of KAY ° w,.. D 'a Y. 1 'J 1 q F uo.00 ;, $ COURT o ^' 8 i ;c f ° r �oz :) H 61.11 y, O O o ° r STREET . "` `o6s °3 z a.» GOLD 3808 ... 2791 ` �U d .•0 +a1 3 19.3) 10'.x3 _ A n W '� N a ~ o W ' N e bR 10461 l0 i.a0 ]21.]1 101. � p r o S ° o �aa on � .x, o° quo 0o roc„ - ;; .. 4 N • Isac or 101.29 V WAGNER STREET s w P I u 13 0 0 � o m � ty 11. 6 ' 4 N io er 8 u at n D •o.oT, __ —T. —_ .,s.1, e I _ C�fRT °po o °y W 4O o « �� e so , 2 • d 1 - • m, . z]• t �r] 6 GRAHAM L s d V Ol 1 ' ° s +• , • " O ° O S 1.0 59 100.00 ) s.m )Soo 75 00 11.00 $4.17 400 ;; • o N _ r` m r CJI u. ae i O ' 9 • 0o 'lu T P A W N — a • 1 r 1 ns.0 V . o.o o s ,° o ',e1 PL T x ] w 100.00 )5.00 )6.00 )S Op 75.00 •U• 101.30 jyp •e e6Y 000x1 00 3960 ' , r r V P ell % ,1 60 100 fJ ' u, • 3 O E g N E i _ NS !1 V s �CS� 11 n 8 ,1, T. •O,lo 1 °4, 0 B L Sl ST a s R G sia +6 26640 CENTURY AVENUE 4 . t: } F. '. L. • PADEN R N Tor l -a7. Y'vae� � ^s �'Ep�ooO WAS ACT - pAbf,U S A 1 ,9M O+' � Nb ti/l; MA>- a w Gny SHAVE � In boo �y WAIM6er 74,000 ' �a ti ` a 0 ro r w W W 2 Q (na •s °o ac.:c. $ATLANTA AVENUE F19 ST : Z Or ADDITION g 8 N O ._ 4 5 6 m I- +o lea co h uo ru f BALTIMORE AVENUE ti/l; MA>- a w Gny SHAVE � In boo �y WAIM6er 74,000 ' �a ti ` a 0 ro r w \ SID p�Ks Y ! � 3 3 a a 01 zoo = S j 4 =S 4 `: s Proj. 91 -14 4 O $ 6 8 S e 8 5 0 -1 134.99 ul oo : 4 • _ J 230 C a.o 1 ao w P pi�1 e LL 7' / e e e M S a m 2 �: 3 CL OUTLOT CA ° e 290 8 U �� « T 2i D: 2 • H / 366 SN.00 1!4.00 134.00 34000 �l400 13100 13+.00 134 -00 _ 4 i e sa. *a N I 30z .90 ., i 3 I 1 6 3 n f' ° , L - -- i F— - 10 2 43°2 7 Z • w 292.!9 Ll 3 � a i us.a • I F 8 I i o ° ` N 134.0 w I I W « j 4 J n0 2 HILLTOP Z LANE : 2 .,c • ` Z 9 +B y i 4 ° 5 g 6 10 4 1 Ov 2 I o SK� IS 4 r 3 I. 21000 0 ;;039 •' 00 134.00 !! 14 15 16 17 :L 41 ` .. V • V •� j a 4•'+ . . 2 Y A IV WES'i ,HOOD RD. -�� ,'' e % e 'G:'6 - 2C.0� 7 4 024 '.2+eq ..oN c r 4 ` •\ (s 3 b '�'• 3 � z I 3 '39is 'C(4( '2.l( x� C: ° I ' ' r i3800 -1; w.s' #L�7 °` ZEN ')• .45.00 1a.00 F . y SiON / i e 2 p0 . 3 ?. I 4 I P QL C J TO: Gregg Soupir, Area Manager FROM: Dolf Moon, Director of Park 6 Recreation DATE: December 28, 1990 RE: Luce Line Trail Gregg, due to the severence of the Luce Line Trail within the City of Hutchinson, immediate action was taken to install signs along the trail to help reduce snowmobile traffic in non — designated areas. The signs erected state that no motorized vehicles go beyond this point. They were placed in the Basspond and Kimberly Estates Park locations. It is our hope that a designated route be established in 1991 to close this severence. The Hutchinson City Council and Parks and Recreation Department are anxious to see continued developement of the Luce Line Trail to benefit all users. If I can be of assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. cc: John Mlinar, City Council Member Gary Plotz, City Administrator • City Halt Parks & Recreation Police Department 37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South (612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242 Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 - Printed on rc: ydnf Pa;x -r - 44 January 4, 1991 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT Lew 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (GL) 587 -7575 FAX (613) 587 -409G RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Snowmobile Trails Our File No.: 3188 -90 -0177 Dear Gary: or COC " CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL' WILII m W. CAMERON ]603 CEDAR LAKE ROAD HINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545 -9000 MN TOIL FREE 600-343-4345 FAX1612)545-I)93 501 SOLTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371 (612)369-2214 , ,\ ) 369 - ( � , qtr- FAX (632 - ^ °�E,.�. G J , •YY / �2i�;;z FOR YOUR INFORMATION I have Dennis Potter's letter of December 21, 1990, In addition, I have discussed this matter with Dolf Moon, and other city em- ployees, and it is my feeling that I do not believe the City should undertake this project in the middle of the 1990 - 1991 winter. Although it seems clear that the City could indemnify the property owners, our coverage limits may not extend to the total amount of liability available. Under those circumstances, I would much pre- fer the liability to be assumed by the DNR which is ultimately go- ing to be the responsible authority in any event. The DNR could then hold the City and the property owners harmless and indemnify those parties from any loss. I do want to note that both of the property owners involved have been very cooperative and more than willing to assist the City with the understanding that any such trail would be operated on a year to year basis and would not involve any significant alter- ation of their property. If you have any questions or problems in connection with any of the foregoing, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, • , ARNOLD ) McDOWELL �j r 9-.,m Barry Anderson GBA :mb 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA. STATE BAR ASSOCIATION A "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 6— DAVID B. ARNOLD GARY D. XCDOW ELL STEVEN A. ANDERSON O. BARRY ANDERSON• STEVEN S. 110GE LACRA E. PRETLAND DAVID A. BRUEO(EMeNN PALL D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES LTLP.Y JULIA A. CHHISTIANS RICHARD O. McGCE TIMOTHY W. PAPINSEI January 4, 1991 ARNOLD & MCDOWELL ATTORNEYS AT Lew 101 PARK PLACE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563 (GL) 587 -7575 FAX (613) 587 -409G RESIDENT ATTORNEY O. BARRY ANDERSON Gary D. Plotz Hutchinson City Administrator 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 Re: Snowmobile Trails Our File No.: 3188 -90 -0177 Dear Gary: or COC " CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL' WILII m W. CAMERON ]603 CEDAR LAKE ROAD HINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 (612) 545 -9000 MN TOIL FREE 600-343-4345 FAX1612)545-I)93 501 SOLTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371 (612)369-2214 , ,\ ) 369 - ( � , qtr- FAX (632 - ^ °�E,.�. G J , •YY / �2i�;;z FOR YOUR INFORMATION I have Dennis Potter's letter of December 21, 1990, In addition, I have discussed this matter with Dolf Moon, and other city em- ployees, and it is my feeling that I do not believe the City should undertake this project in the middle of the 1990 - 1991 winter. Although it seems clear that the City could indemnify the property owners, our coverage limits may not extend to the total amount of liability available. Under those circumstances, I would much pre- fer the liability to be assumed by the DNR which is ultimately go- ing to be the responsible authority in any event. The DNR could then hold the City and the property owners harmless and indemnify those parties from any loss. I do want to note that both of the property owners involved have been very cooperative and more than willing to assist the City with the understanding that any such trail would be operated on a year to year basis and would not involve any significant alter- ation of their property. If you have any questions or problems in connection with any of the foregoing, do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Very truly yours, • , ARNOLD ) McDOWELL �j r 9-.,m Barry Anderson GBA :mb 'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA. STATE BAR ASSOCIATION A "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION 6— IfIlN M SURANCE PLANNERS Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast Hulcnmson, Minnesota 5535C December 21, 1990 Mr. G. Barry Anderson Arnold 8 McDowell 101 Park Place Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 RE: Snomobile Trails 3188 -90 -0177 Dear Barry: FOR YOUR INFOPIVI LN The normal terms and conditions of the City of Hutchinson's liability policy apply to owned property of the City used as a snowmobile trail. There are no special exclusions that apply to this type of property or this particular use. The City of Hutchinson's liability policy, unless there is some contractual agreement, would not extend to property owned by the County, State, or DNR or property owned privately. If a privage property owner was sued by an injure:- party using the snowmobile trail there would be no defense under the Citv's policy for the private landowner. Unless we are holding private landowners harmless by a contractual arrangement then everyone is on their own. The private citizens The State of Minnesota The County of McLeod The Department of Natural Resources The City of Hutchinson My suggesion would be for the government agency in charge of the trail to hold everyone harmless and indemnify them in the event of a loss. Please let me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, 4✓ l Uennis W. Potter DWP /slb cc: Gary Plotz Telephone: 612- 587.2299 Fax: 612. 587-0808 6 1 — n 0 \_J CERTIFIED MAIL Gary Plotz, City Administrator City of Hutchinson 37 Washington Ave. W. Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Gary, DFt;t °9c December 28, 1990 r `'= RE: Downtown Development- - City of Hutchinson Contract with Lloyd Allen 5o ti - 'J J K QI This confirms our telephone conversation of Friday, December 28 at 3:55 p.m. I enclose the following: (a) COPY of Page 2 - -City of Hutchinson Purchase Agreement to me. Please note paragraph five (5). • (b) Copy of December 1, 1990, letter to Barry Anderson re: nonpayment of rent by J & J for December. As we discussed, we have complied with all provisions of this agreement. The City of Hutchinson has not! The city was advised, in writing, of the nonpayment of rent as of December 1, 1990, with payment due from the city within ten (10) days. This has not been done. By copy of this letter, we are advising the City, in writing, of our intent to charge them for the responsibility of attorney's fees. Because of "unnecessary communications ", "unnecessary correspondence ", an 'unnecessary maneuvering" on the part of the city, approximately $325.00 in attorney's fees has already been incurred. In my opinion, it should not be necessary for any discussion on the matter. A contract is a contract! As far as we are concerned, the contract has been broken and we will proceed accordingly. Cordi y, loyd H. Allen . LHA /sja lO ��' the payments at closing shall be made with separate checks. 3. Joint Environmental Matters Buyer agrees, at Buyer's sole cost and expense, to remove and dispose of any and all as and asbestos containing materials located on the site. Buyer agrees to remove and dispose of any and all other hazardous or toxic substances, material or waste encountered on the property the presence of which was not directly contributed to by Seller in compliance with all applicable legal requirements. 4. Right of Access to Property Prior to conveyance of the property by Seller to Buyer, Seller shall permit representatives of the Buyer to have access to any part of the property of which the Seller holds the right of possession at all reasonable times after reasonable notice to Seller by Buyer to obtain data and make various tests concerning the property necessary to carry out this agreement. 5. Possession and Leases Physical and legal possession of the property shall be delivered to Buyer on April 30, 1991. Buyer, and not Seller, shall be responsible for negotiating and terminating any and all existing leases on the property as of April 30, 1991. Seller shall not enter into any new leases or extensions of existing leases affecting the property after the date of this Agreement, except that Seller at Seller's sole cost and expense may continue to lease space in the cold storage building subject to the April 30, 1991 possession date. Seller shall cooperate with Buyer in Buyer's negotiations with tenants having leases on the • Property. Buyer shall be responsible for the timely payment of all rent on the premises through April 30, 1991, and if such rent is not paid by the tenants, Buyer shall pay such rent to Seller. Seller shall notify Buyer in writing of any non - payment of rent. Buyer shall pay the unpaid rent to Seller within ten days of the notice of non - payment. For purposes of this provision, references to rents or rental income include interest and late fees. Buyer shall pay all expenses relating to the termination of any of the leases associated with the commercial building, including without j limitation attorney's fees. Before any attorney's fees are (/\ incurred by the Buyer under this clause, written notice shall be given to Buyer of intent to charge Buyer for responsibility for attorney's fees. 6. Broker Disclosure Buyer and Seller each warrant and represent to each other that no brokers have been used in this transaction and each agrees to save, indemnify and hold harmless the other from and against any and all claims, costs, expenses, finder's fees, liabilities and obligations of every nature, kind and description from brokerage services from any person, firm, corporation, partnership or other entity claiming entitlement to fees, commissions, compensation or expenses from brokerage services -2- -i 5] fice productf, inc. Ronan -3rd cave. i.e. mn. 55350 prione:6n -pa -,tom December 1, 1990 Mr. G. Barry Anderson Arnold S McDowell 101 Park Place Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Barry, Persuant to our purchase contract with the city, I am notifying you of the non pay- ment of rent by J 5 J of Mankato Inc. for the month of December. Per our contract the December rent of $525.00 is now due from the city within ten days of this notice. Thankyou in advance for your prompt attention to this matter. Cordially, Lloyd H. Allen Office furniture • �� Eq�pment fYloCMne�•Suppher Interior t)erign Services 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9388 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $137,500 FROM HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION 0 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: THAT a $137,500.00 transfer from the Hutchinson Utilities Commission to the City of Hutchinson's General Fund and Capital Projects Fund is hereby accepted. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator . RESOLUTION NO. 9389 DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, The Hutchinson Leader be designated the official news- paper during the calendar year of 1991 for the City of Hutchinson. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor 0 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 7 R, 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9390 APPOINTING LEGAL COUNSEL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT G. Barry Anderson be appointed as City Attorney at a retainer fee for a one year period from January 1, 1991 to Decem- ber 31, 1991. Services to be included within the retainer fee are: prosecution of Police Department cases; attendance at all City Council and Planning Commission meetings; preparation of Resolu- tions and Ordinances; negotiating property acquisition and counsel- ing property owners on relocation law and benefits; legal services for all bond issues, except legal services for industrial revenue and tax increment bond /note issues and other customary legal serv- ices in the normal cause of City business. Matters such as appearance in county, state district, or fed- eral district court will be billed separately, with an annual ceil- ing for such legal expenditures as determined by the City Council. State Supreme Court and Court of Appeals will be billed as extra legal services outside of the retainer fee and aforementioned ceil- ing. Legal action initiated to collect obligations owing the City or its agencies may be billed on a contingent fee basis and any amounts received for such actions shall not be included in any aforementioned ceiling. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gar, 0. Plotz City Administrator 0 1 -d• 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9391 APPOINTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR FOR 1991 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the following appointment to the indicated executive office of the City of Hutchinson is made for the period of one year. Compensation shall be continued as agreed upon by separate Council action: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator E 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9392 ENTERING AGREEMENT WITH PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT the City of Hutchinson will enter into agreement with the Pioneerland Library System Board for a period of one year beginning January 1, 1991. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor 0 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator \J 7 — 4e • RESOLUTION NO. 9393 DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORIES OF CITY FUNDS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS AND INSTITUTIONS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA THAT the following named banks and institutions, which are authorized to do a banking business and act as depositories in Minnesota, be and they hereby are designated depositories of the Public Funds of the City of Hutchinson in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, by the City Council of said City, for the term commencing January 2, 1991 for one year: CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY, HUTCHINSON, MN THE FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA, HUTCHINSON, MN MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON, HUTCHINSON, MN THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNEAPOLIS, MN NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS, MINNEAPOLIS, MN FIRST BANK ST. PAUL AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL NATIONAL CITY BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY MARQUETTE NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS MERRILL LYNCH, DAIN BOSWORTH, INC. PIPER JAFFRAY & HOPWOOD, INC. upon terms and conditions following, to -wit: THAT this designation is subject to the right of said City of Hutchinson, Minnesota to modify, vacate, or revoke the same accord- ing to law, and also subject to any depository agreement executed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 118.01 and Section 475.66, and THAT the use of these depositories shall be for monies from the proceeds of bond sales or grant reimbursement monies only. The . interest rate from these institutions must exceed the interest rate of City financial institutions by more than .005. 7- F RESOLUTION NO. 9393 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT the City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson is here- by authorized and directed to deposit in said banks and institu- tions in special funds to be known as "City of Hutchinson" all monies that may come into his hands. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: THAT a copy of this resolution be filed with the City Adminis- trator and each of the banks and institutions so designated. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor E ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 . RESOLUTION NO. 9394 DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY OF CITY FUNDS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND IRAN ASSOCIATIONS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT First State Federal Savings and Loan Association, Hutch- inson, Minnesota and Midwest Federal Savings and Loan, Minneapolis, Minnesota are hereby designated as an official depository of and for funds of the City of Hutchinson up to the maximum designated by law. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. . Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 7 -� 0 RESOLUTION NO. 9395 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA • WHEREAS, the First State Federal Savings & Loan Association of Hutchinson, a City Depository, has presented collateral as follows for the City of Hutchinson, Burns Manor, Utilities Commission and Hutchinson Community Hospital: DESCRIPTION MATURITY AMOUNT FHLMCPI #288142 3 -01 -17 $ 748,492.46 FHLMCPI #288553 3 -01 -17 442,975.11 FNMAPI #34645 9 -01 -16 111,910.53 FNMAPI #228 2 -01 -11 187,812.26 FHLMCPI #285976 1-01 -17 1,318,893.17 FHLMCPI #286373 2 -01 -17 173,698.83 FHLMCPI #303968 5 -01 -18 675,416.42 FHLMCPI #292517 5 -01 -17 413,395.18 FHLMCPI #294741 6 -01 -17 104,756.05 FHLMCPI #293912 5 -01 -17 254,215.16 FHLMCPI #296904 7 -01 -17 745,249.03 FHLMCPI #289209 4 -01 -17 742,369.21 US Treasury Bond 2 -15 -16 1,075,000.00 TOTAL $6,994,183.41 BOND FOR HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BUILDING PROJECT US Treasury Bond 8 -15 -20 1,033,437.50 US Treasury Bond 8 -15 -20 1,033,437.50 US Treasury Bond 8 -15 -20 1,033,437.50 TOTAL $3,100,312.50 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securities as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safekeeping. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. 9 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Paul L. Ackland Mayor 7 -� • RESOLUTION NO. 9396 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Marquette Banks of Hutchinson, a City Depository, has presented as collateral $2,325,000.00 as follows: LEDGE DESCRIPTION MATURITY AMOUNT 503923 U.S. Treasury Note N92 6 -30 -92 $ 500,000.00 492095 FHLB 92C 4 -27 -92 400,000.00 402729 Denver Co. Airport Ref. 12 -01 -2000 100,000.00 Rev. Bond 477618 MN GO Rural Finc. Auth. 11 -01 -91 200,000.00 587055 U.S. Treasury Note T93 5 -15 -93 500,000.00 is 592249 U.S. Treasury Note N94 6 -30 -94 500,000.00 537090 Burnsville MN GO UT BQ 2 -01 -2001 125,000.00 TOTAL $2,325,000.00 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi- ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe- keeping. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • 7 • RESOLUTION NO. 9397 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON AS SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Marquette Banks of Hutchinson, a City Depository, has presented as collateral $5,900,000.00 as follows: RECEIPT DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 507998 U.S. Treasury Note D92 $ 400,000.00 557297 U.S. Treasury Note G92 500,000.00 547994 U.S. Treasury Note H91 100,000.00 504936 U.S. Treasury Note H91 200,000.00 460617 U.S. Treasury Note E93 600,000.00 504935 U.S. Treasury Note Q91 400,000.00 508140 U.S. Treasury Note T91 400,000.00 556712 U.S. Treasury Note E93 200,000.00 508550 U.S. Treasury Mote F92 400,000.00 476663 U.S. Treasury Note E93 200,000.00 559445 U.S. Treasury Note H92 200,000.00 576271 U.S. Treasury Note H94 500,000.00 570240 U.S. Treasury Note P93 300,000.00 • 559304 U.S. Treasury Note AE91 500,000.00 599791 U.S. Treasury Note M94 500,000.00 576839 U.S. Treasury Note R93 500.000.00 TOTAL $5,900,000.00. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi- ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe- keeping. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: • Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 7- T RESOLUTION NO. 9398 CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET VENDOR Spring /Summer Brochure *Cost Share City & Fir 2,821 tate Fe Program Information eral Rec. Yes* Standard Printing The following items were authorized due to an emergency need: ITEM COST PURPOSE DEPT. BUDGET I VENDOR Pagers (8) *1990 Budget 3,072 Replacement Fire Yes* Motorola, Inc. Date Approved: O otion made by: Seconded by: January 8. 1991 Resolution submitted for Council action by: 74- RESOLUTION NO. 9405 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of Hutchinson, a City Depository, has presented as collateral $5,300,000.00 as follows: RECEIPT DESCRIPTION RATE MATURITY AMOUNT 008281 Moorhead, MN 5.200 01 -01 -91 $ 50,000.00 008281 Mesa, Arizona 12.000 07 -01 -91 100,000.00 008281 Rapid City, SD 9.500 09 -15 -91 50,000.00 School Dist. 51 -54 008281 U.S. Treasury Note 8.375 09 -30 -91 500,000.00 008281 U.S. Treasury Note 7.625 10 -31 -91 500,000.00 008281 U.S. Treasury Note 7.625 10 -31 -91 500,000.00 008281 U.S. Treasury Note 8.375 06 -30 -92 1,000,000.00 -- Fed. Home Loan Banks 8.375 07 -27 -92 300,000.00 008281 U.S. Treasury Note 7.875 08 -15 -92 500,000.00 269841 Fed. Natl. Mort. Assn. 8.200 11 -10 -92 500,000.00 544219 Fed. Home Loan Banks 8.300 01 -25 -93 500,000.00 608684 Fed. Farm Credit Bank 8.960 04 -18 -94 500,000.00 008281 Arlington, MN 8.500 01 -01 -95 50,000.00 008281 Cambridge, MN 8.500 03 -01 -95 50,000.00 008281 New Hope, MN - G.O. 9.750 02 -01 -96 100,000.00 239716 Owatonna Sch. Dist. 761 6.600 02 -01 -97 100.000.00 TOTAL $5,300,000.00 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi- ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe- keeping. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator L. RESOLUTION NO. 9406 RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF HUTCHINSON AS SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION WHEREAS, the Citizens Bank And Trust Co. of Hutchinson, a City Depository, has presented as collateral $7,000,000.00 for the City of Hutchinson as sponsoring agency of the Utilities Commission as follows: DESCRIPTION RATE MATURITY AMOUNT U.S. Treasury Note 9.375 02 -28 -91 $ 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.125 05 -15 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.125 05 -15 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 06 -30 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.750 08 -15 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 08 -31 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 08 -31 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 9.125 09 -30 -91 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 9.125 02 -15 -92 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 9.125 02 -15 -92 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 9.000 05 -15 -92 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 06 -30 -92 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 02 -15 -93 500,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 8.250 02 -15 -93 500.000.00 TOTAL $7,000,000.00 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi- ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe- keeping. Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of January, 1991. Paul L. Ackland Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 7-1/1 (612) 587.5151 f/U1CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST . s HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 January 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Connie ManganC�� RE: BUDGET REVISION REQUEST TO SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Attached is the budget Revision Request for The request adds additional administrative funds rehabilitation project. Vickie Rephs, Dept. of opment suggested an extension of the program for would allow two building seasons for the housing allow sufficient time to close out the program. the Small Cities Program and adds the housing Crade and Economic Devel— one year„ to December 1992, rehabilitation program and As of December 31, 1990, 20 loans totaling $425,532.35 have been made: • Commercial $389,823.35 SCDP HCDC Apartment E $ 35,709 SCDP HCDC 282,621.93 107,201.42 25,889.03 9,819.99 I am proposing moving $5,000 from apartment rehabilitation and $30,000 from commercial rehabilitation for administration. This would leave $92,901.07 of SCDP funds (72.57 of the loan amount) for commercial loan, and $31,948 of SCDP funds (72.57 of the loan amount) for apartment rehabilitation. I am also proposing to delete the Hutch Hotel project and to add a housing rehabilitation program (see memo of 12/24/90). The Housing Rehabilitation proposal will use $265,000 for housing rehabilitation loans and $35,000 for administration of the housing rehabilitation program. CM /bb 9 -AP OR SCDP - 00= 0 002 -0 -FY 8 GRA NTF..F.:CITY OF HUTCHINSO taiVlJl(tN I f ( 1 II! {ti "f f -- _ t'R011:( I' TI T I.F MATNSTRFFT UPTOWN' Pull P pp C7 BUDGET SUMMARY CIIKitEN'fHUDGEI' ADIUSTMEN "f RHQUESTGD RHVISHD C'IIANGIi APPROVED/ M , 13YAMIVIIY RIiQI1GSTED Iil1DGHT DISAPPROVII) Y Activiti S CDP O TITF R TOTAL SCDP 0 VTR TOTAL SCDP 01 =.R TOTAI. 9a Apartment rehab 72657 53704 126361 (5000) 18616 13616 67657 72320 139977 LMI j y i 9a Apartment rehab 12000 -- 12000 5000 -- 5000 17000 -- 17000 m Adm. HMO P-7."M 0 rM 9b Commercial rehab 406523 226650 633173 (30000)(25048) (55048) 376523 201602 578125 M r l slums and blight r tM 9b Commercial rehab 38250 - -- 38250 10000 - -- 10000 48250 -- 48250 % 0 adm a -4 my n 9a Hutch Hotel 300000 643000 943000 (300000) 0 (300000) 0 0 0 O V LMI O % 9a Hutch hotel 8500 -- 8500 -- - -- -- 8500 -- 8500 n adm 13 Gen. Administration 25000 -- 25000 15000 -- 15000 40000 -- 40000 9a Housing rehab 0 0 0 265000 0 265000 265000 -- 265000 LMI 9a Housing rehab 0 0 0 40000 0 40000 40000 -- 40000 administration 3 Water entrances -- 300000 300000 -- 300000 300000 m tp Rehab Project A yn TO I'A LS 862,930 923,354 1,786, 84 862,930 573,922 1,436,8 2 L J LJ LI (612) 587.5151 7/UTCN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 110 =6wmmm � DATE: December 24, 1990 TO: Havor and City Council FPotf: Connie 11anaanUUN F:E: AMENDi!E11T TO SMALL CITIESS DEVELOPHE.IT PF03r1A 1 Your consideration and approval is requested to s <bmit a request for amendment to the tfinne=_ota Depa.tment of Trade and Economic Development to delete the Hutchinson Hotel Rehabilitation project and add a housing rehabilitation program to the Snall Cities Grant. When the City of Hutchinson was awarded $862,000 from the Small Cities Development Program, $300,000 was for the rehabilitatior. of the Hutch Hotel into housing for low and moderate income people. In 1989, the apartment rental situation charged dramatically. During 1989, 20 8 apartment units were added to the market and the . need for the proiect was questioned by the Hutchinson Community Development Corporation (HCDC). The HCDC set up a Ta Force to study the question.. It was the opinion of the Task Force that the Hutch Hotel posed score serious problems for redevelopment: 1. Parking would not be available in close proximity to the project. 2. Project would not cash flow even with $300,000 as an outright grant. 3. Downtown location of project not appropriate for the need for 3 and 4 bedroom apartment units. Based on this the Task Force recommended that the $300,000 be used for other housing needs in Hutchinson. John Bernhacen and I discussed a crant a^.endmen*_ with Vic'• P.eph of the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). DTEC confirmed that under the Small Cities Program, the $300,000 awarded t.`.e Hutch Y.otel project has to be used for a housing related project within the downtown area. Of the various housing proposal. John and I proposed DTED preferred a h =using rehabilitation program for the older neighborhoods on the east and west side of Hain Street, from the river s^uth to Oakland Ave. (see attached map). The proposed housing rehabilitation program cuidelines are attached. The amendment will also include a request to extend the grant from December 31, 1991, to December 31, 1992. (see attached budget). 9- >q. a CITY OF HUTCHINSON HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES FI Income - Low and Moderate Income Households Those families whose incomes are less than: Household size 1 $18,700 2 21,350 3 24,050 4 26,700 5 28,350 6 30,000 7 31,750 8 33,400 �A 3 Eligible Rehabilitation Health and safety items are required to be fixed first Housing Rehabilitation Needs: Exterior Roof Siding Foundation Exterior Doors Storm Doors Windows Insulation Egress Garage Other Maximum Rehabilitation Loan Amount: Interior Electrical Plumbing Furnace Bathroom Fixtures Linoleum Interior Doors Kitchen Cupboards Carpet Interior Painting Interior Patching $12,000 4. Loan Term: 0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of house. HOUSING REHABILITATION BUDGET 25 loans at an average of $10,600 - $265,000 Administration 35,000 $300,000 • 0 -A I� - ----- --- © E s HUTCHINSON •I,. ,,,,, ,,, � I � MINNESOTA ]C IiC.i[• ACC `ii . ............... Hutchinson Community Development Corporation Board of Directors • Wednesday, January 2, 1991 Chamber Meeting Room Directors Present Keith Weber -Vice Chairman John Mlinar Phil Graves Bill Craig Larry Fraser 1jpr CI O Others Present John Bernhagen -Exec Dir Kathleen Skarvan - Chamber President Connie Mangan The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Keith Weber. Motion was made by Graves, seconded by Mlinar and carried to approve the minutes of December 5, 1990. Motion was made by Mlinar, seconded by Fraser and carried to approve the Treasurer's report. Bernhagen reported on the - Star City" recertification process. The Business Retention Survey has been completed and forwarded to D T E D. Bernhagen will summarize in report form the activities of 1990. Our 1991 Work Plan is ready for action at this meeting. A Star City Self assessment tool was distributed to the board to be returned to the office which will also be included as a part of the Annual Report, The 1991 Work Plan was presented by Bernhagen. These objectives were suggested by the board at a previous meeting. They were then reviewed by Chairman Bullard and Bernhagen for continuity and consistency. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded by Craig and carried to approve the work plan and goals as presented (Work Plan and Goals are a part of these minutes). The board reviewed the 1990 Work Plan. Bernhagen furnished an update of the various activities. Fraser and Bernhagen reported on a business proposal made to the Business Innovation Center(BIC) now located in Granite Falls. Redwood Falls was selected by the BIC board based on several factors, i.e. - central to the eighteen county area it serves and a subsidized rent provided by the city of Redwood Falls. Connie Mangan and Bernhagen presented a recommendation for amendment to the SCDP grant for an alternative use of the S 300,000. allocated for the Hutch Hotel. These monies are to be used for Low and Moderate housing rehabilitation and must be in the geographic area of the original targeted area for the grant. ?-A, An HCDC Real Property Task force had determined that using these dollars for the Hotel posed some service problems and that the money be used for other housing needs in Hutchinson. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded by Craig and carried to • recommend to the City Council they submit an amendment to the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED) as follows: 1. Use the S 300,000. designated for rehabilitation of the Hutch Hotel for Low and Moderate apartments for use on housing units in an area bounded on the West by Glen St., Century Avenue cn the South, and the river on the North and East. 2. Rehabilitation would be for qualified low and moderate income people with priority given to owner - occupied units. 3. Maximum rehabilitation Loan amount is $12,000. 4. The loan would by at 0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of house. A mortgage lien would be filed on the property. 5. $ 35,000. would be set aside for administration and be completed by December 31, 1992. Graves reported on a Transportation Study with the City. County and DOT concerning a fringe road dealing mainly with the traffic of State Highways 15 & 22. Bernie Knutson, Chairman on the HCDC Transportation Committee will serve on this study committee. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. 11 0 Y, PARKS a RECREATION a FORESTRY 900 Harrington Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55950 (612) 587 -2975 SENIOR CENTER CIVIC ARENA -6,7nsoh 587 -6564 587.4275 TO: Mayor b City Council FROM: Mark Schnobrich, City Forester DATE: December 19, 1990 RE: Acceptance of Bid for Log and Limb Purchase On Deceeber 7, 1990, bids were submitted and opened for the pur- chase of the logs and limbs derived from the community forestry program in 1990. Three bids were presented with the high bid of $560 being received from Hutchinson Iron and Metal Incorporated. I recommend acceptance of the Hutchinson Iron and Metal Incorporated bid. klm • BID TABULATION CITY OF HUTCHINSON F_ I L PROJECT BIDS - LOGS 6 LIMBS DATE December 7 1990 - 2.00 P.M. BIDDER SURETY AMOUNT DELIVERY Robert E. Anderson Hutch. Machine & Tool $430.00 Hutch. Iron 6 Metal, Inc. 560.00 Duane Otto 450.00 hutchinson community hospital a LifeSpan" member 1095 Highway 15 South, Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 • Telephone 6121587.2148 December 19, 1990 V J The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and City Council Members ti> f ' Hutchinson City Hall s s �sz ti. 37 Washington Avenue West Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members: The Board of Directors of Hutchinson Community Hospital, at their regular meeting last evening, considered bids for a flash gravity steam sterilizer needed by the Hospital's surgery department. Only two vendors manufacture this type of sterilizer for health care; those vendors were contacted, and their bids were received. After carefully examining the bids, a recommendation was made by our surgery supervisor to accept the lower bid from Castle Corporation at a cost not to exceed $22,146. Following discussion: "Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Gilmer, to recommend to the City Council the purchase of the flash gravity steam sterilizer from Castle Corporation at a cost not to exceed $22,146. All were in favor. Motion carried." Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, HUTCHINSON COMM I1` SP AL Philip G. ra e� Administr or PGG:Ih • A. O. (Tony) Victorian . COUNTY ASSESSOR December 6, 1990 To: Gary Plotz City Clerk From: A. 0. Victorian County Assessor Enclosed is the 1991 assessment agreement between McLeod County and your city. Due to increased labor cost the past two years an adjustment in the assessment fee is necessitated. -� 7' • Please present this to the city council for approval and return to this office. • McLeod County Equal Opportunity EmployerlAffirmative Action office Of McLeod County Assessor Court House 830 11 th Street East Glencoe, Minnesota 55336 TELEPHONE 864 -5551 a 910171 � s 1991 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN LOCAL UNIT AND COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Hutchinson and the County of McLeod , State of Minnesota, this 10 2nd day of January 1991 . WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson wishes to abolish the office of assessor for said City , under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.072, and enter into an agreement with the County of McLeod to provide for the assessment of the property in said City by the county assessor; and WHEREAS, it is the wish of said county to cooperate with said City to provide for a fair and equitable assessment of property; NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL CONVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the City of H utchinson which lies within the County of McLeod and constitutes a separate assessment district, shall have its property assessed by the county assessor of McLeod County, beginning with the assessment of the year 19 91 , providing this agreement is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota. 2. It is further agreed that the office of local assessor of the City of Hutchinson is hereby abolished, pursuant to this agreement and the approval of the Commissioner of Revenue, and that such office shall cease to exist for the duration of this agreement, which shall be until December 31, 19 3. In consideration for said assessment services, the City of Hutchinson. hereby agrees to pay the County of McLeod the annual sum of 21,500.00 , such payment to be made to the county treasurer on or before December 1, 1991. day of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement this 19 In Presence Of: ai In Presence Of: For City, Village or Township Signed: Attest For County: Signed: By Attest The above agreement is hereby approved by the Commissioner of Revenue this day of 19 John James Commissioner of Revenue Rev. 1968 �� �� 0 (612) 587 -5151 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 H 8 H 0 • DATE: January 2nd, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council and Planning Commission FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering RE: Hutchinson Area Transportation Plan On Wednesday, December 12th, Mayor Paul Ackland, City Administrator Gary Plotz, Building /Zoning Official Jim Marka and myself met with the following MnDOT District 8 representatives: Dave Ekern, District Engineer Mary Gieseke, Assistant District Engineer (Construction) John Hoeke, Assistant District Engineer (State -Aid) Larry Hoben, Assistant District Engineer (Maintenance) Richard Bautch, Transportation Planning Coordinator (Mankato) Jon Henslin, Pre - Letting Engineer Gene Setrum, Engineering Specialist (Pre - Design) The meeting was set up to discuss short-term and long -term goals and objectives for highway construction in the Hutchinson area. In particular, the discussion centered on reconstruction of Trunk Highways 7 and 22 through town. T.H. 22 from Fair Avenue to Main Street was programmed for 1995, and T.H. 7 through town was proposed to be programmed for 1996 or 1997. After much discussion, it became clear that rerouting T.H. 22 over the Bluff Street bridge was unfeasible due to the number of structures and loading docks along the route. Alternate routes crossing the river also appeared to be unfeasible. Other possible routes were also discussed for T.H. 7, but it was the consensus that the current route was the best option. The City representatives stated that they would like to see T.H. 7 programmed earlier to connect the newly constructed portions on either side of the city, and wait with T.H. 22 until a feasible route is determined. A number of items were brought up which will require further review. 1. Should T.H. 22 be rerouted to provide a better route for truck traffic? - The existing route apparently can not be feasibly modified. - A route on the east side of the city, connecting to the • proposed C.S.A.H. construction along the south fringe of the city could also serve as portion of a potential future rerouting of T.H. 15. - The existing funding for T.H. 22 could be shifted to T.H. 7, and T.H. 22 through town could be upgraded utilizing P Cooperative Agreement money (city designed, $200,000 available /Phase, 3 Phases). 2. Should a route for rerouting of T.H. 15 be set aside now? - Realizing there is not an immediate need, based on projections the existing route will probably be unable to safely handle the traffic projected for 20 years in the future. - A route could be studied, surveyed, and set aside now utilizing the State Official Hap System, to preserve the integrity of the route. 3. Should future projects involving T.H. 15, T.H. 22 and C.S.A.H. 89 be reviewed for compatibility and serviceability, and to eliminate redundant spending? - C.S.A.H. 89 should be located to be compatible with future Trunk Highway Improvements. - Can a T.H. 15 rerouting utilize proposed C.S.A.H. 89 and T.H. 22 routes. Hn /DOT has asked the City to try to prepare a preliminary concept plan by March 1, 1991, so that they can accurately include our proposals into their long -term scheduling and financing plan. It is proposed that a Hutchinson Area Transportation Plan Task Force be set up • to prepare a preliminary draft of the concept plan prior to March 1, 1991, and work afterwards to complete a final draft of the concept plan, including the possibility of routes being set aside utilizing the Official Map System. It is proposed that the committee consist of: - City Director of Engineering, John P. Rodeberg - City Building /Zoning Official, James G. Marka - City Council Representative - City Planning Commission Representative - County Engineer, Rick Kjonaas - County Planning Official - County Commissioner Representative - HCDC Transportation Committee Chairman, Bernie Knutson - Downtown Development Committee Representative, Skip Quade This committee should be set up immediately in order to have time to prepare the Plan. The City, County and MnDOT are meeting at 1:00 on Tuesday, January 15th, 1991 at City Hall to review C.S.A.H. 89 proposed construction. JPR /pv cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Adm.; James G. Harka, Bldg. /Zoning Off.; John Bernhagen, HCDC; Rick Kjonaas, County Eng.; Bernie Knutson, HCDC Trans. Comm. Chmn.; Phil Graves, Hutch. Comm. Hosp.; Skip Quade, Downtown Dev. Comm. Rep. (612) 587.5151 f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 January 4, 1991 MEMO TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: 1991 GENE FUND BUDGET BACKGROUND Much discussion of the State short fall of revenues has already taken place. For Cities all monies have been received for 1990. The short fall for the State of Minnesota involves their year which ends on June 30,1991. Since all of our monies have been received it would seem to free us of concerns about this year's short fall. (There has been some talk of a refund from cities for this year of • 1990 dollars. It may prove to be an accounting nightmare and meet with strong opposition since Cities have already contributed, in our case, $58,000. The short fall could be handled with use of the State of Minnesota's fund balance.) For the next year large dollar shortfalls are being talked about. This could impact our 1991 budget as the dollars for Local Government Aid and all credits do come in the last half of the year. The speculation has ranged over a wide area- both as to the dollar amount of short fall and to the methods of dealing with the problem. It is all speculation until the Governor and Legislature have decided on what the problem is and what is the solution if there is a problem. PROPOSAL As this as background we would offer the following at this time. A freeze for 3 months of all capital expenditures. For 1991 we have a total of $97,000 budget for capital expenditures. We would like to exclude from this freeze the CAD system previously approved by the City Council. At the end of the 3 months we would review the plan with the City Council and take what action was deemed necessary at that time. By this action it would better position the City to be able to act in time for 1991 - if the decision is to cut 1991 aid dollars. 0 9 -F • - :ci -r RESOLUTION NO. 9399- RESOLUTION ADOPTING POSITION CLASSIFICATION ASSIGNMENT TABLE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1991 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the existing classification of positions for the City of Hutchinson and the current economic conditions, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Position Classification Plan is hereby adopted. All positions covered by this Resolution shall be grouped in grades having a definite range of difficulty and responsibility. For each position there shall be a title; and there shall be shown examples of work which are illustrative of duties of positions, as well as requirements as to knowledge, abilities and skills necessary for performance of the work; and a statement of experience and training desirable for recruitment into a position. A. Allocation of New Positions. ---- - - - - -- -- - -- ---- - - ---- When a new position is created for which no appropriate description exists or when the duties of an existing position are sufficiently changed so that no appropriate description exists, the City Council after recommendation of the Personnel Coordinator shall cause an appropriate job description- specification to be written for said position. • B. Review of Plan_ As often as necessary to assure continued correct classifications, the Position Classification Plan shall be reviewed by the Personnel Coordinator and necessary adjustments recommended to the City Council. C. Filing of Plan_ Upon adoption of this Resolution, a copy of the Position Classification Plan approved by the City Council shall be placed on file with the City Administrator. The plan so filed and subsequently adjusted by the Council shall be the Position Classification Plan of the City. Elements of the Plan_ The Compensation Plan shall consist of: a. A Basic Table of Numbered Pay Grades for All Emeloyees_ Each numbered pay grade in the basic table consists of a minimum (Level 1) rate, a maximum (Level 7) rate, and a midpoint (Level 4) rate, in addition to intermediate levels, shown on page 4. b. A Position Classification Assignment Table for Employees_ The assignment table shall assign all of the various positions in the Position Classification Plan to the appropriate pay grade. Said table follows on page 3. 2. Modification of Plan. ------ - - ---- -- - - --- The City Council reserves the right to modify any or all of the pay grades or position classification assignments as set forth in n said plan at any time. rs .,c ai fff 3. Pay Grades_ a. Non_Adginistrativ_e (Hourly) Egolgyees Each position is assigned a pay grade. The normal beginning rate for a new employee will be the minimum rate. After satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months probation, up to a five percent increase will normally be granted, with the exception that such increase may be granted midway through the probationary period (at six months) with the approval of the City Administrator. Thereafter, consideration for performance increases will be given annually each individual anniversary date. The City Administrator reserves the discretion to adjust individual rates within the assigned pay grades based upon (a) a merit review and recommendation from the department head, reflecting job performance over the preceding twelve months, and (b) consideration of equity among departments. Consideration for market adjustment for all pay grades will be made each January 1. b. Administrative (Salaried) Employees_ Each position is assigned a pay grade. The normal beginning rate for a new employee will be the minimum rate. In special situations, a beginning provisional (Level 0) rate may be used. After satisfactory completion of twelve (12) months probation, up to a five percent increase will normally be granted, with the exception that such increase may be granted midway through the probationary period (at six months) with the approval of the City Administrator, Thereafter, consideration for performance increases will be given annually each individual anniversary date. The City Administrator • reserves the discretion to adjust individual rates within the assigned pay grades based upon (a) a merit review and recommendation from the City Administrator or department head, reflecting job performance over the preceding twelve months and (b) consideration of equity among departments. The Council will determine any merit increase for the City Administrator. Consideration for market adjustment for all pay grades will be made each January 1. C. Police Civil Service Employees_ In Police Civil Service positions, the established starting rate for patrol officers shall be Grade X, Level 2, followed by a probationary period of one year. After completion of probation, an increase to Level 3 shall be granted. Likewise, an increase to Level 4 shall be granted after completion of two years employment and to Level 5 after three years employment. Thereafter, length of service shall be recognized as follows: On completion of 5 years service, On completion of 7 years service, On completion of 9 years service, On completion of 11 years service, On completion of 13 years service, On completion of 15 years service, On completion of 17 years service, On completion of 19 years service, On completion of 21 years service, On completion of 23 years service, 1% additional; 1% additional; IX additional; 1% additional; 1% additional (Level 6); 1% additional; 1% additional; 1% additional; 1% additional; 1% additional (Level 7)- MAX. Any market adjustment on January 1 of any year shall be separate and apart from the above individual anniversary increases. (2 of 4) Supervisory and investigative police department personnel shall be salaried, with salary subject to periodic review by the Chief of Police, and any recommendation for merit adjustment made to the City Administrator. Any market adjustment on January 1 of any year shall be separate and apart from the merit adjustments. None of the increases provided by this section shall be made so as to compensate any employee in an amount exceeding the maximum step in the assigned pay range. EE IT FIIR'THEAA' RESOLYU Pf THE CITi COLRC-iL O: THE CIT OF CWTCtilNE ;," That the following table is hereby adopted as the City Position Classification Assignment Table, to be reviewed from time to time, assigning the various positions in the Position Classification Plan to the appropriate pay grades in the table. Pay grades for regular part time (PT) positions are assigned according job responsibilities at the discretion of the City Administrator and Personnel Coordinator. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- POSITION C_ASSIFICATICN ASSIGNMENT TAF F -- -- - - -- -- -- ---- - - - - -- -- -- ---- -- - - --- PAY GRADE JOB TITLE PAY GRADE JOB TITLE • 0 I Liquor Store Clk C /PT) 11 - X Senior wastewater Plant Op. Park Maintenance Supervisor III Transit Dispatcher (PT) Police Patrol Officer Senior Program Sup. CPT) H /SAL Forester Motor Vehicle Clerk(PT) IV Reception/Cashier Cashier (PT) Xi water Systems Supervisor - Sec'y CPT) Street Maintenance Supervisor Police Cle Police Clerk rk IPTI Maint. Operations Supervisor D D Liquor Store CIk B (PT) Police /School Liaison Officer Building Inspector CPT) V Accounting Spec. (PT) S /SAL Asst. Recreation Director(PT) Police Dispatcher CPT) Personnel /Transit Coordinator Police Officer (PT) Bus Driver F /SAL - Assistant to City Engineer Custodian /Boiler Door. Recreation Facilities Manager Liquor Store CIk A Liquor Store Manager Park Plaint, General Police Sergeant vi S Account Technician Police Investigator Secretary, Police Dept. Small Cities Project Coord. Secretary, Parks /Rec. Secretary, Planning Coo. E /SAL Building g Official Fire Marshal VII Personnel /Insurance Tech. Director w /wwater Operations Secretary, Engr /Sidg /Fire Police Dispatcher D /SAL Director of Parks /Recreation VIII water /wwattr Plaint. Tech. C /SAL Director of Finance Laboratory Technician Chief of Police Administrative Secretary Finance Technician MAL Director of Engineering Motor Vehicle Dep. Reg. IL water Plant Operator A /SAL City Administrator Wastewater Plant Operator Senior Wwater Maint. Tech Cemetery Plaint. Super. Engineering Technician 11 Equipment Mechanic Park /Arena Maint.Operator Street Equipment Operator I /SAL Community Svcs Coord CPT) Recreation Specialist Youth Center Manager (3 of 4) payI991 N62 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PAY PLAN 1991 (Hourly X 2080.- Annual) GRADE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 LEVEL 6 LEVEL 7 (MINIMUM) (MIDPOINT) (MAXIMUM) TI 4.25 5.00 5.75 T2 4.53 5.33 6.13 T3 4.82 5.67 6.52 T4 5.13 6.04 6.95 I 5.49 5.81 6.14 6.46 6.78 7.11 7.43 II 5.90 6.25 6.60 6.94 7.29 7.64 7.99 III 6.35 6.72 7.09 7.47 7.B4 8.21 8.59 IV 6.82 7.22 7.62 B.03 8.43 8.83 9.23 V 7.33 7.76 8.20 9.63 9.06 9.49 9.92 VI 7.88 8.35 8.81 9.27 9.74 10.29 10.67 VII 8.47 8.97 9.47 9.97 10.47 10.97 11.47 ' VIII 9.11 9.65 10.18 10.72 11.25 11.79 12.33 1 / IX 9.79 10.37 10.95 11.52 12.10 12.67 13.25 H J X 10.77 *11.41 12.04 12.67 13.31 13.94 14.57* 6 / XI 11.85 12.55 13.24 13.94 14.64 15.33 16.03 F 13.03 13.80 14.57 15.33 16.10 16.87 17.64 E 14.34 15.18 16.02 16.87 17.71 18.56 19.40 D 15.77 16.70 17.63 18.56 19.48 20.41 21.34 C 17.35 18.37 19.39 20.41 21.43 22.45 23.47 B 19.08 20.21 21.33 22.45 23.57 24.70 25.82 A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20.99 22.23 23.46 24.70 25.93 27.17 28.40 This Resolution authorizes staff to change 1991 budget appropriations to reflect rate changes. Adopted by the City Council this 8 th day of January_, 1991. (This replaces Resolution No. 9182) ATTEST: --------------------------- Paul Ackland, Mayor ------------------------------ Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator (4 of 4) 0 (612) 587 -5151 �N ✓rca' CITY OF ,HUTCHINSON — n:! 1. 55350 If E 11 O R A N D U if DATE: December 19, 1990 • TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM, Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED B7 M & P PARTNERS ACOMA MINSHIP (2 MILE RADIUS) The Planning Commission recommends approval of the sketch plan contingent on satisfactorily meeting city staff and county requirements. 9 -r• f' (612) 037.515 �'J._�:' •� '.ten a... c ... >_ ... .. ... �... M E M O R A N D U M I DATE: December 4, 1990 TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission FROM: Planning Staff - G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. MarY.a, G. Field and 24. Hensen ' SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY M &P PARTNERS ACOMA TOWNSHIP (2 MILE RADIUS) It was the consensus of the Planning Staff the submission is uncomplete and requests the following: * Provide a Subdivision Agreement . * Complete soil borings as conducted by a professional. soils engineer. * Review soil conditions with county. * Provide complete site plan of adjacent properties. • Address all drainage and signage concerns. • Meet with City Staff to discuss overall develccment of the land. • �.« ..:. -.. _. s ... _ ems... .,.».+<x...s�.tYar. (w. r. iN<, Lti. wwVa. a.is.,.C..:.�:....dYf...�...�a• ... -w �.. �...w. wr. �...s.n.,........- .._... — «a.. � s , •' •e ` ^ r - , ;� 1 �r��2 / ;IN �" ,3 I� r . � �•,f l 5: <,I� i'. - 6 - = /:�' 1 7 4 IJ i Zc —I'4 / _17 4— _:,LS= N 213 �; c2 � • - 192 7s ? SC - AV EN UE - I ze zoo.co a oc 1 �.,:,,<a f-- ACOMA TOWNSHF 117 NORTH CODE -i RANGE 30 WEST MEEKER c0. O 4000 IIf00. IR IT. OO• RUM B FLED EJERLE I [ bA¢f BELLE LAKE 1 - BI u A : ' LC6 MME? AR4 •• ^. �: CEDAR ' - RS W]LLIAN �l mD ff ' RAOINj 1 sOn N' I i J •°I Y. I°N p TRASN4NN I _,Q J o�l ti C LnKE - - :RH -; O R 3 E GEOR[i J RIEA c .z / I 0 f T s B XAOTNV aM2 • Q J]° -J SJM1 -x - sw MLE RLEr rHCfF �v .lriJ - J 1 I e °-t F77F ° •N J. � � � u..HUE €a'I' h'••w� o-•:flir y eos � 'w:l osr .. .- a � I Y a f �. 9 / / avl � Kro 8 _— ' EfX1Ew00D FARMS D ' RXY 4Lp n 'r R D'J. . ;4LD W • �� fMw[I I "vENOCRF� 12 RA SN. FK° OP PGR1 i I ltt HLUE ER tl.. J\ IL l IlAaa gN eEllc [s a r�1 L°�x to RCU .ELIZ -THI 5)OnE� • '� V 129 .:m ]a so.l I•a W H of —f' . BO Imx]z r t l E cEL0QR DALLM -{ rOa NE R° °Ilar(i B sp a[ r' - - ]rv3 - DaLLNwm 5 �•�' -_ ' �� I E�60 155E wM N455 AEN B ED WALTER PLAM4NN 5 V[ P E B � ,. 0) i . N OP AxOD B At EYE LU EO>'KE �. ,1 I 15811 ~'..o I RERT ACV IiZ • 1 �• N 0'.JO[ s r "I N fI S S 1 16101^• LS! B - �' ° BI ].I �1•> _ Lr-� � P z 13 0) oc.rs G J] '•weals ' w 4 -y�•l Gra�'!wnR`- 'n•aor.o e • LE 4R• Hn55 • 1 .- e . �w mil J — 4K E5 a °F ) 1 W �� X / �+- 119 )0 , y KE B STEVEN h . B {DTTO_ I r I fS LBERx UAL IM1 Z] -x J mJl� �Ew[• HGff �<- BeO < ✓ xJ °rF1'6 - E� tFr ., [nF. ° u� SWFk ^ STS J I x r NO aln EHXR(Fi =E /y Y Fi] 7 Is.?o x ` lFpfe ). PACO SEEDS (1 T`iU u.0 1. l] we ' s..o -J Y I f' `LO. + �� i[x 5 VlE 1 ERRE-L5 LAKE �0.T2 1 KE /MARTHA - TEAS OHN ER DO a. 1 I J.. r 1 •s ]o'. , - ,r c LgPBERT BI xKZAllS ETCL < LL_ KID .1 M1d9:'gl ri0 i. I l veo _. a. �♦ )1N • ) groo • ILwgVvDLE 1 _ ss a p 1EF PM4lIN o. EnL {r ].. p -. X12 SS ( B uss P' �•', .0 C °R "�;f 1�OBB]\ �.2'. f ]r 1\ian.v,i > T4L BUSS nn awl V_1 F[i1 - mom lLis.. .... _ -. x: -: �� f B n 5 .A RY I • .0.^f L I B I Q) S I ( �I ' N m 4 N j. I4 a•TM 4 i TE FRED HI W �1E5 � z L.rNf .. . Jl E E+ALUZO.1 E rn LIP , LT RACp PD 1 J �_ _, l z - - ^� AGNES w (�FN- nL 1FENE 7 IS.N -. nu - J. B ' ,'�� •r..rt'N I Ba f,V 4N F Vfgi IF I.n R.TMKanG ERICKSON I1 B G ACADEMY /J I ., i EC1l.LE- O I 7 \ LIARENLE 1 1 IELD L TER K uA F mQ ' TH E D F ERLIN) ' [ ..l ;EwSc yv. .. .. ELSIE lFa88 MADE <0 wKRE EVANS ® a� °4 39 �g �� z�:n © 1[21 Lib qp { qq//�� Lrm[ m �i�• .. A SCWEeLiK S). Io lMY(ttlN I' op m 2` • `. .... • YDI4 8 ~� J 91 B • 1LW1EA 4 Q �' HARYEY OB 2) Z!TTSf 1ED \1 ` QNENCELL -� HA RL;.9 FE � R TEwS GLENN B RN c.} Hi ROLD UMNACH 'SHE. -X r INDfF N - _ x�5" . .'`•✓ QfCE TEwS A 1 Mala.2'I ❑UNXEi T .� H4Rp1� (••• . - EBE41"_ - 2w Qua E WS e) y F] � _Iz CHAIRES RAOUNl ED N' EA• s• VERNA ] 4• • 1 s [ ° ` I � E•XNN t0 1 al NOE MC CoRM,CK 1 W "'NN 8� N LT R M aa� • A MA RYANI I ELGE NE WARNKE 'l p •OWTI EprlA . . ••! EST TZ OETTMAN OF!T a \ BRq B 1 • .Jf -1 � 1 1 �L (.rii •/ �� uE LLA L 01 o ALD i I OEIPR',TD 27wA LJIER B r W � V 1v TI I B,�XNW.n T�OEMXiNG l BERGHWS EDWIN B r2A EVE wETCR SOMGj 2CI BO EDNA .kARG nw¢J LIJTYEIIs 'WU5_EY B B p ,; �JUI O —/ J \ t 1 ENCE RE r �+J:w {, �O S I:. w 1 110 E: _ -11 , 4 {s E [ a ° b �2 2 � _ �a PR /EYE r< V o \t I n y O u\at q T ARRY \ �Q E vE9NONSTUR GES Ni q H..XN 1 90l 2 1lT E S. _ :BERT B Q'KfF 9.5 -4 ERTHA k U.. EJ�KE •F J4Ai \ -\ . \� \' Z . �2.0 I 1 ( _RUSCH 2O HANN Lr NN v IP.GE'S1 TWP SMALL TRACT OWNERS 7i. f . -... e. .,.. _ 9_z (612) 587.5151 HUTCH C/TY OF HUTCH/NSON „y 37'� " ✓�SNi VGTONAVENUE WEST __ . ri �r� HUTCHIIVSON, MILAN, 55,150 M E M O R A N D U 14 DATE: December 19, 1990 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELI14INARY PLAT SUB14ITTED BY GALEN HOUK (2 HILE RADIUS) The Planning Commission recommends approval with no objection. • 9 -.T R E S U'U' D I Vs S 1 IN 1 1 , ." 0 P LOT ,- M'...y..,„.•s....n�.. .; . ...ryw......1, ,., ,.. •.+.w. .. '.wn.a._.rx.w�- :..•O'vwo•wv..wH ...a..JwW •.,.F, N.OL. .,.5 Yh -S � •..• �N {.1.i'.wAY+.f.......MS "NMk_rw4. > :+•.•p•,wN.wMi.= „ SUBDI V ISION 1 ' OWNER GAL � Ei I. RT 2 HUM MINN[ ••. •. NBa•00'42 -E i... ••. -11 A - I LOT .. \ TOTAL A 10.30 •\/ _ • \'.•i a/ LOT m l .. ..' ror urarw y HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH CODE •G RANGE 29 WEST NUTCHNSCH Iwct !S TWA Seel w w T Oo! .o u[I .LSO y 50 , . 0( 1I11 • B .511 .[.[ [ [ 5.[ Ie ..{ ..11 • I • JAAES i+[4° f I ® I ®JCS[• :' I - 1 _ va5 1 LFC/ [rlen.tt u .. `( 1 .7� tt'rcE. . u /j r q0 EA LIS qUp R YaSA I \� \s\ Oh Ar.t • �. � RULff RG 1 \ \ [ ° n T•� • GR x10. a 'd"« .a.t . • M1 EST `TZnE •' wr. L H[� LO,; WAS. AEEEN O4RYL B [RATTZZOE K[[ MLR[ DRgCS "ANNET E 1 .0 v[nP (p+,', : L 1 \ 0 • � [R 157 STANLEY MDSEL WTHEN3 , u J GREGCR N�CIETTE C M� IO pwr �uLpE TALE w �ESOTR 4. 1 • \ . ar +a 5.• (•. .e NLIWGEER Q ♦ lJ AT rn 5' €� °1° RLO D T. Yr [w.UtK o ♦ �� ( II 1 3 LwsTLY e F CXDANL0 If t 0 e �) [• tQ a• .m.OY TURGES Me tEii C _. I ES :ar � So, .RtG'Fl.9YH ICRD nu Lit lw.•[.+ N . SLSgw ` FB - NB B EST PM �[ •' A'IE CA 'CA �RtL �1` J5 ll r ` R i. ••• ��``LL\\ • GRCr Ifi �� /j�J. ` ••nr _ " [' GE iT � S i EL�SE'r E ... w. .TAE H " ERVIN B RE9ECA IXIRLD //1 Iw50M TVMRN = >f_ MYRCN 1i[:� NELE`I •. ff • (T D SELLERS In w / /,AKBS 1n. NME. ry / J " »mai RcT1FA[ EL[A . ECHT % /1_ITI i`::. Ec1.w I i1LM [Ea �!� 9. D [ _ .�.'. , l ira_ .n I I. . d rn i.. t GED a J ,[< © ..[�' G::a fs B SELEN O > N<LO ` E[e`BRT all arm - — en �xFR ft � v�T t YELVIN B ' -fnn'R ,C 1� tYppl Pot 3 prt�gO p+ FEIO ES CGWLIHE ¢ tCCS9eCR \ �qJ �CCW0 IEELLD ER IRHE45 �II r NMM VH04S VAL.� A'� RIS t b0U0.A5 BR�$ U+o [..L "LLA GAUGER TGN �N.D Aus I - 91:P � _ 1 .. �� c .E.r•c, aH O 1 Imm _ B Q MARIAN E118 4 SET 33 F v x• -•Ias IEst REERT r �� 9EUL JN ,:_:� EL', 1ER N IWTHEMS Ertryll 7• l vE9ETi �8 VWE9 ., rJEirGENS !IL` &A.MET T #lAF pANCW z _l11 Ivl B 6 DpR15 vAT WOETKOM' B o.Ewi 4/E .1 J NNA . N _ ST W4 C.[ROL T•M n _I wPo oR[T •�' DOU4D N. R' #N5 CH E9 GHT s a S31 UAM LEE _ gRGENS .Q n © ➢GE'E R ' 13 ,� CE NEK IR[ .r 22 © I R1 NC. _. G 2 RR ES 9 i I� O QI K�NQI 36fi ALiE _SL (�. C eTifJFE I • SANI¢N 'f IL LAN B YER B t rELC[ES LiA S:N v , °RGV ' �w c+a HEWER T ¢[• JERGE'S a-[Tq ��B QLL ARO B .,AwS 90 RLL ) ) IIR Tq I U E N Q LET E 2r RByN T V .rwa. IENRE In , tR� MY , x x a _ �:. �Z �. — w< B E -..RD SJUEIEw- • } .. _u" #•E €YT� G r VEY B HIE, DIANE RAY Ii` SIC; LERx y 0R KIRn AN 4H i L . V .,1 a-J• o- EUGENE 4 ESi 0 _ 2 FR [[I� IEx ", rY B a [L[n E ' m 'E I S 11 SIR. 505.E `N'..We. a_ '7 1241 AD III, �RS]IY I mn Ee.ou � t2 � �p JN \ 3 '• • ° B1 I A Cf1 I �� 6 LEONARD p' Ht ` •� " Q J. 0. FARMS I T < E ur J ALD RNt} NoN DRESSE [ YC9REN Q • nLLAN e. a BnfElA4 ) LE^ B �( E4WM DREE SEL S�.vr[ I . . pL B aTl �L?PE �°1ER I " CYEIMIiZ [Q CHARLES L n_ F e y 90 < 1. PETERS n QY 2 [ [ Iso 3 HILDA coa [OnaC )rH °LHwARZE E'RrE C4)HO RD B RAZ ' : ltl ( ELEEN WELRE '' � 8©1 (D 7 J 1 1 � � E Of SS EE .. ` P&;Y n Si �•Jt A. ( L ' RATNoT0 T VVMB '9.N a C OPINE p Ort •1L•o OSnRL a $01wARZE •Ei0- DALE . RASgS[fl w EhT —u<r RG�E RAN w 4 H- H.:rO nETERS ! '• U, a A[,•1 n . e 9AL E` P DL L 4 IE"RL w IRp- u5T vDTOR 8 [t1x ••[rN IY�' r. oR 'RF ETAL LDRRAINE TFAS �I ` B E 3e NREN [ .va.uu HDCR (] '� ACNE` I • n '^ JEO W WATER IMAGE 101 1YP. SMALL ERACT OWNERS ii 1 - v • 1IINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING Tuesday, December 1. CALL TO ORDER FOR YOUR 1NFORMAT1 COMMISSION 1B, 1990 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30 p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint Gruett, Dean Mood, E1Roy Dobratz, Craig Lenz and Chairman Bill Craig. Members absent: Tom Lyke. Also Present: Building Official Jim Marka and Building Inspector (lark Hensen 2. MINUTES Mr. Wood made a notion to approve the minutes with corrections on page 2 of the regular meeting dated Tuesday, November 20, 1990. Seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS (a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FRO11 R -2 TO C -4 REQUESTED ON THE WALMART PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT • The public hearing for the request is to be continued to the February meeting. (b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIISINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION The public hearing for the request is to be continued to the February meeting. 4. NE11 BUSINESS (a) CCIISIDERATICN OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY N &P PARTNERS ACO11A TOWNSHIP (2 NILE RADIUS) Building Official parka commentel on staff recommendations being the same as 6 months ago. There was discussion on research of the topography of the area. Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the sketch plan contingent on satisfactorily meeting city staff and county requirements. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. (b) DISCUSSION OF SHOPEO SITE PLAIT • Building Official Harka updated the commission on progress of the project stating the site plan is very 1 HUTCHINSON PLANNING C01111ISSION MINUTES 12/18/90 preliminary. He explained that Shopko will present the completed plan to the city when ready. (c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK HASSAN VALLEY (2 RILE RADIUS) Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend - approval with no objection, seconded by Fir. Ebent the motion carried unanimously. (d) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT ON 5TH AVE REQUESTED BY BOB SANSTEAD Withdrawn. (e) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY ROBERT HANTGE Building Official Marka commented on the request of constructing a Twin Home. He stated the transition would fit in with the present Townhouses in the Miller PUD. It was the consensus of the commission to recommend a public hearing on the proposal. 5. OLD BUSINESS (a) CONTINUING DISCUSSION REGARDING LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY Chairman Craig proposed continuation until after a meeting including all parties involved on Friday, December 28, 1990, in the city offices at 1:30 p.m. (b) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE - PROCEDURE There was discussion of changes and how to address them. Building Officialttarka suggested all commissioners bring their questions and concerns to him and he will compile them. After that the commission could meet with Mr. Weber for questions and discussion. 11r. Marka will present an update of comments at the January meeting. (c) COI 114UNICATION FRO14 STAFF Building Inspector Hark Hensen commented on his letter and responses by affected property owners on the Hwy 7 readdressing proposal. He stated there would be approximately 50 address changes. Discussion followed on the original addressing. Mr. Wood stated from the post office standpoint he would recommend the change. It was the consensus of the Commission for Mr. Efarka and Mr. Hensen to talk to City Attorney Barry Anderson concerning i u • HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION HINUTES 12/18/90 the legality of the changes with or without platting. 6. OTHER BUSINESS (a) PROPOSAL BY BOB ELLIOTT Building Official Marka commented on a proposal by Mr. Elliott, Town and Country Tire, to remodel the Meade building on Washington Ave. for his business. Mr. Elliott then presented a sketch plan of the proposal requested and the parking, remodeling and reconstruction of the building. Discussion followed on the loading dock. Mr. Marka stated he is concerned about encroachment into the right of way. It•was the consensus of the planning commission to work with staff and return for a public hearing. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. 0 • 3 C' i � Cox �r i i 11�er�lhers, - _ _Gr_ ri 9r) t 1i o _ ; - -- - -- - - -- - -- when_. ->`��_._��_�- _�� r._�ec�!--- �� -��►�� _ bci jJecl__o b2 _ _ _her_, - -c%_- _C'a - - - -- __ _ _cep)! �-hey je c _ nn - > _ c /oy -(gi b- -the u � _ _k 141 p ar. arr/ X-. rcp))(fc/ hUUse _ -qr Meii 5ai�1 C-. a Fe�gw)lr� &Ccc use z `� more o{ a 5)ope -jh i �iC1e �` 11 I c 1 refzD/iect L ti(c1 c�la-,(j- w.� � C� cc� i lroc cle- . '�heJ Ca�1cl_ ell; ed _ ►� euerc�l. we(tra erg k- . a. ��he -�G�c �hc there_ -Id .,D(- _ _c -co ll - -here, -- _. _ - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- jo - - — Yl- -- ! - -- - -- -- �.1�U_._..1_ -- Eli - - - - -- _ -- -_ i � -- - _1et- _4-h e_- _ever -_ Saf )h -e s - _la haC/ _ ..9 CIO"? e _ -?the ; �/� c�F _ /��'l Or 04 �6 PCI J `50 Z _ /'y)aC/e 612e i97r (:f_ 4p he �s nC ;,, b�tf obe /ri ham - C'cf l/ c7nc/ c� e Ef a } m cse Me oeX4 hCA v C IO e vc) he SG el mcq4 Iia,b; c� a a �n►n5 wc��1 , beec�use Yee c�� dt'rloI ate} �c,,i �i i mEGc vJcc,l( - {a /1, C\o _ \,C � 4e-\\ _ . 1e _ _ u— -- i'c G Ao c!v Une a the __l c��d h - -C � - � _o� 3. + ackid- Vu�---- h-ek1--b6a pcoy bleyy) u-nLs wheh - i1 ej e ad'k J iounc rid e av)A "P CA- ------ d,_ - 4kat -4.42e-,-� 6Lat-�' Joon 0-00 1�'Qf-ML a +16 I (and--LE L5idc, o-� 4 le- --yard, ukoi oucr )4- *)oK mu i f - j C kADCU�jd jo I ' pt lAo -, �jc \ ll . hck�.e cw-,\; �iQkd d - c U r w i g �e (Y) cki e r 1 ct- I -S rind � L,) i rn y Cu' -n � I 1 1 -T --sc d 1'4 Ond 3c id hc -4he - LA o i (d b loQ6 OF roe-K 4hCA+ 4hR an c \ � Uv�ped Z/ f ' r -and q l b hand Q wc� t t c M _ da �5aA- � �Su uf _ A/,Cl I -7 ron - OcA rok - dbwe) - �o - - -! )Pe - 1 l i 1Jhe- n�)(_b - hGv�cL- y _�e�aUSe -�o�e o- the _ _rcC,c W. pl eye l - h e r cp-. b of n �'(:� _ _rrx'X�._ `J- }�►_�'1_,. -_ I q ncj rPpl�` / cry 3 oi_n a b; /l h6 sk� Z -scud + t n i - }i4d and LfS cr (:�4 the rcCk �{ x _ Miff C1 l 0 r ,L �Utc1 C ,Y-. -finf- l Q\-�>c .'-.t )d 3cibru+ 4he b 11 -'cm * e �1b Cap c hid i �s ` S - x T- Cj' a few da Lz:en4 b,� .a Pei -- +he bil f0ncl h t,UrC1f rn� CK �-he db Jw he 1�1 _c� (ma ncn 1NL 1\ \EEO DAlf - WANDINInNERAh SCRENSEN FARM NM INC. ERMHINSON, MN 55350 Ph o n e: 612.587 -2162 (Fl.m 1a�,.) IAdMmI HEREINAFTER CALLED LESSOR, AND HEREINAFTER CALLED LESSEE. WLTNESSETH: That in consideration of the payments and rentals hereinafter provided for, and of the terms and conditions hereof, the Lessor hereby agrees to leave and does lease to the Lessee, and the Lessee hereby agrees to lease from Lessor, the following described equipment belonging to the Lessor, to wit: • EQUIPMENT RATES $ PER HOUR PER DAY v PER WEEK PER ACRE/TON E MIN. CHG. T AL VALUE $ Above equipment to be used in operations on at or near 4 ! in Late of TERM OF LEASE: The term of 4 thi.lease e for of hours, days, beginning with the weeks, IB_ at a • m • and t p.m. o u e day of ,19_ at a.m. p.m. RENTAL RATES AND PAYMENT: The rental 0-t. do not include sales, use or oc� p naltaxes. If and w.�h,��/een s ch lC )n b iaw se amounts shall be added to th 1 a y menu e this ca� JL DATE IN - HOUR c RENTAL�.f GE DATE OUT HOUR ✓ TRANSPORRT CHARGE HOURS, 5, EFKS USED T RENTAL $ TDTA _ REFUND S 0 No alteration or modification of this Leske is v 1' ess in writing andWgned by the parties hereto. Lessee acknowledges receipt of a s he OF THIS CONTRACT. reof. ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED ON THE REVERSE HEREOF ARE A PART IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have on the day and year first above written whereunto set their hands and seals. ` BY SIGNING THIS LEASE, LESSEE AGREES TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH ON THIE FACE AND REVERSE SIDE HEREOF. ANY DIFFERENT Ou– AnnTTTnvAT Witness _ Phone No. OR LESSOR By MRM PER 53O IM MI) An RIAITS RESMMFD BY NATMu TARA3 It PDWIA HKIMMENT ENAtERS ASSOCIATION, ST. IWIS, W. 63111 NINM IN U.S.R. DATE NY AND INElwHfl: SORENSENTARN SUPPLY, INC. HUTCHINSON, MN 66860 / c &) Phone: 612 - 687 -2162 Tr N.) (Add.w.l HEREINAFTER CALLED LESSOR, AND _ HEREINAFTER CALLED LESSEE. WITNESSETH: That in consideration of the payments and rentals hereinafter provided for, and of the terms and conditions hereof, the Lessor hereby agrees to lease and does lease to the LessEw, and the Lessee hereby agrees to lease from Lessor, the following described equipment belonging to the Lessor, to wit: QU ENT RATES E PER HOUR a PER DAY $ PER WEEK $ PER ACRE/TON a MIN. CH6. �• TOTAL VALUES Above equipment to be used in overations on at or near in the State of TERM OF LEASE: The term of this lease shall be for a period of — beginning with the day of at P m: and terminating the at a.m. p.m. in sales, RENTAL RATES AND PAYMENT: e rera� sales, use R occupational taxes. If N when s tax i e be added to the rental payments du under tf,' ntr day of hours, _ days, weeks, ,19_ contract do not include law, thes774 DATE IN HOUR NTAL CHARGE $ �`(Lr/ %>"� DATE OUT 42- S HOUR y TRANSPORT CHA E9�5 , HOURS, DAYS, OR WEEKS USED TAX t ` y, p1� $ RENTAL CHARGES TOTALCHAR F�✓ ADVANCEDE $ REFUNDS BALANCE S i No alteration or modification of this Lease is valid unless in writing and signed by th ar{I'psi _ hereto. Lessee acknowledges receipt of a signed copy hereof. ��// ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED ON THE REVERSE HEREOFiPART• OF THIS CONTRACT. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have on the day and year first above written hereunto set their hands and seals. BY SIGNING THIS LEASE, LESSEE AGREES TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET TERMS, WHETHER WRIT HAVE NO LEGAL FORCE By Witness _ Phone No E. RE HEREBY OBJECTED TO AND Y HATSOEVER. f epled and Approved LESSOR By _ .` FORM FER 538 (REVISED 19813 All RIGHTS RESERVED 8Y NATIONAL FARM a POWER EDUIPIAETIT DEALERS ASSOCIATION, ST, tOU S, W. 0127 PRINTED IN U.S.A. 0 /o —B, (612) 587.5151 Hvrcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON i 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 October 12, 1990 Tom Carrigan 105 Pauls Road Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Clifton Heights Letting No. 5, Project 90 -07 Dear Mr. Carrigan; The City has been exceedingly tolerant and lenient in dealing with your requests for work on your boulevard. City personnel have spent nearly forty hours hauling and unloading, rock, sand, geotextile fabric and topsoil, inspecting and reviewing the boulevard, meeting you on -site or talking to you on the phone, and otherwise trying to help you to develop a boulevard you can be satisfied with. Unfortunately, that does not appear likely to happen. 10 When this project started, the City proposed to slope your yard to an easily manageable 4:1 slope, like many other properties along this and many other project areas. Since the area only has 40' right- of -vay instead of the standard 60', there was only a 2' boulevard behind the curb. Due to this fact, we tried to work with you to find a solution suitable to everybody. You at first requested a retaining wall, and noted that a landscaper had told you that your yard could not be properly sloped. I then met with you and Tom Priebe of Priebe Landscaping, at which time Mr. Priebe told you that he would recommend sloping the yard and not constructing a retaining wall, which was our recommendation. We then moved a tree for you, sloped the yard, and installed 1' of topsoil to satisfy your concerns about sod burn out. This appeared to be satisfactory to you. Your main concern appeared to be your deck steps. We noted to you that the deck is non - conforming due to its closeness to the boulevard, and apparently was constructed without a Building Permit. A week or so later you told us you wanted us to construct a field stone retaining wall. We felt strongly that this was not necessary, and in fact could create a safety problem with site distance and utility lines, and could increase liability due to the potential for injury. We noted that we would supply the rock, sand, fabric and topsoil necessary to construct the wall if you would supply the labor. We also noted that the wall should be entirely on your property, not on the boulevard. Tom Carrigan October 12, 1990 Page 2 We supplied two loads of field stone, a roll of fabric, a load of sand, and two loads of topsoil. You, in turn, constructed the wall in the boulevard, saying that the landscaper had told you it must sit against the curb for support, which apparently was not true. We agreed that this could be done only if the rock was below the top of the curb, and laid basically flat for the first 2' in the boulevard. Instead, the rock is over the curb, and steep enough that it will be a problem with snowplowing, and will certainly be a maintenance headache. The sand is already significantly eroding into the gutter. The City has kept its agreement to work with you, and have ended up with an unnecessary retaining wall which was not constructed as we were told it would be. The City has completed its effort. We will not consider any bills for Bobcat use, or any other work which was not authorized. We also remind you that the. liability and maintenance created by the retaining wall are your responsibility. Director�of JPR /pv cc: Mayor and City Council Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Cal Rice, Asst. City Engineer Larry Barg, Street Supervisor CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA SUPPLEMENT TO CONTRACT NO.L EITING . SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 10. 2 SHEET 1 OP 1 "ICONTRACTOR: (FEDERAL PROJECT ISTATE PROJECT ICITY PROJECT I I Vd. Mueller & Sons, Inc. I NA I RA I 90-11 I ADDRESS: (LOCATION: • I P.O. Boa 247, Hamburg, MN 55339 I I Wagners Development Corporation Plat ITHIS CONTRACT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: I I The Developer and all benefitting property owners requested that Goebel Street I west of Ray Street be constructed. The following are additional quantities to be added to the original Bid Quantities: I I I ITEM N0. ITEM UNIT UQ ANTITY UNIT PRICE I AMOUNT 1 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) C.Y. 306 $ 4.00 $ 1,224.00 1 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW C.Y. 20 $ 6.00 $ 120.00 1 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RD.STA. 1.6 $ 75.00 $ 120.00 1 2211.503 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5 C.Y. 204 $ 7.84 $ 1,599.36 1 2331.514 TYPE 31B BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 38 $ 22.00 $ 836.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE S L.F. 284 $ 5.00 $ 1,420.00 1 2511.516 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE V S.Y. 620 $ 0.85 $ 527.00 1 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN S.Y. 400 $ 1.95 $ 780.00 1 2506.507 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN DESIGN A EACH 1 $ 676.00 $ 676.00 1 2503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER I L.F. 47 $ 18.15 $ 853.05 TOTAL ADDITION I I $ 8,155.41 I • ' I I I i I I i ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 313,166.80 I I I SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 (INCREASE) + $ 22,162.40 I I SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 i (INCREASE) + $ 8,155.41 I I TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT I I I I i I I I I $ 343,474.61 I I I I I I I I I I I (Original Contract Amount i I I _ $313,166.80 IDated: 19 I (Original Contract Date I I , Director of Engineering I 1 5 -22 -1990 IDated: 19 I , I I I I Contractor I I Mated: 19_ • 1 I I I , Mayor I I Mated: 19 I , _ I I I City Administrator I I CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA SUPPLEMENT TO CONTRACT NO. LETTING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT No. Z SNEET 1 Or I (CONTRACTOR: IPEDBRAL PROJECT 13TATE PROJECT ICITT PROJECT I 1 Wm. Mueller A Sons, Inc. 1 NA I NA 1 90-08 ADDRESS: ILOCATION: i • I P.O. Box 247, Hamburg, MN 55339 1 Monroe Street I ITHIS CONTRACT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: I I The Supplemental Agreement covers extra work performed by the Contractor I as I approved by the City, see attached breakdown. I I I I -- --- -- -- --- ITIIi- - - - - -- UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE I I AMOUNT I 1 BOULEVARD SHAPING LUMP SUM $ 135.00 $ I 135.00 TREE REMOVAL LUMP SUM $ 150.00 $ 150.00 RELOCATE BOULEVARD TREE LUMP SUM $ 50.00 $ 50.00 i LOWER SAN. SEWER MANHOLE LUMP SUM $ 33.75 $ 33.75 COMMON EXCAVATION (EV) CU. YD. $ 2.90 $ 553.90 AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5 CU. YD. $ 7.84 $ 1,293.60 GRIND BOULEVARD STUMPS LUMP SUM $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 SPECIAL DESIGN CATCH BASIN LUMP SUM $ 35.00 $ 35.00 I 1 BACKPLATE - SURMOUNTABLE CURB i REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ. YD. T 3.50 $ 493 :50 TYPE 31B BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON $ 22.00 $ 1,100.00 TYPE 61C WEARING COURSE MIX. TON $ 30.00 $ 300.00 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. FT. $ 0.35 $ 490.00 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ. FT. $ 1.90 $ 2,675.20 5" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY I SQ. YD. $ 22.00 $ 330.00 I TOTAL ADDITION I I $ 8,839.95 I I I I I ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $374,441.54 I SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 (INCREASE) $ 13,121.44 I SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 (INCREASE) I $ 8,839.95 I TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT I I I $396,402.93 I I I I I I I I 10riginal Contract Amount I I I 1 $374,441.54 (Dated: 19 I (Original Contract Date 1 I I , Director of Engineering I 1 5 -8 -1990 (Dated: 19 I 1 , I I I Contractor I I (Dated: 19_ 1 • I I I I I Mayor I I (Dated: , 19_ 1 I I I City Administrator I / 9 Ito o . G1Jyr, )'Yla 0 Iler Suess. • prcf'ccY' qo -oB iioca. /avard SAct o vI•AG IL 7' 3'!(p Mon ►ae &C -ac.s O sF L. , K"05 / 6 a 3 ors �obca f (P�/S = ° /3s' ° �"�3 Yo Povi fvd�fov Roued fr u in S:d� wa t Stv r df e Lo 7' / 14 " V Su• 7 -7 -1 0 Cy/, •. d CL • 1 -zo- go traL/Df Lo we Pc d Sd. f a y S¢a.ye Al y„ ho 1 . 4 d - t a 3/ Mon #_0 e S - zy -90 Ex -ava .•kd ble a f ev ;d f v Ca. i t A vx C fat LrorHM exC, 677) Q �.Z Cu Yd Asy . dd s� "P /did c1- s @ ° .7 'C70— I br,:,d Sf� oo owl .p var Oc/ C�fy / t7o I�rl Z 7 9 / D0 ° —o 5 5p •2Gid/ aLttfy`, C�d_7�t/� BacSin Bac.K *2 46 r �S uFmowr+Yo�b /� �KrG 6 cr•�r<. °-_ 0 3 Id Im . j v d N h J 0 c1 x 3 n 1.J Agyrof yai base_ �o /0r_ e C! S e 6, d r,., a Y c � w L- r K d I a id £ Nrt. ^r �� 5 `/C` ✓. � J•� YV .^ ?�. ya3 �a V �'�"'f :ar l Jcwe✓ 0� d cudf�r t,�c � � � Y P .•. c( r /N ��• i a � ) e f d , ,, C -D � E Yvt i x f ;.c : E r OZ n d A CL I (°/ G L.re d r Co u <!,C Y) fu rL for �nd A a Y 30 ° 30 - r d e ", d- /K m .Qty /a c.e /.rr C.r. P t �< ¢.•t � aka - �+ ^ : £ %7" JY' r � e �y ``// I �Ltn•.0 ✓t 1( �C-:' � , ' f C s, G�t ,. c /!C. /x/00 STL`_ p 3� � S-� Q •� /g S �CMGrete (�y�U.tw¢ /tea ✓F..ncs..� ` F X c e v f e CA jm des, k -Q �b le- .-M � {e r , c hO /Ow .S,•, E7 r e. dC on yyi AAroe S t• c oZ (.;S 330 o Cu>+ ¢Ace vs fiu� Cro eyOQ 2 tt,,�g9 A;' REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 8, 1991 TOTAL $86,691.90 • 11-4 WATER & SEWER FUN 1990 • *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 707.85 Aagard West Dec drop boxes 560.00 American idatl Bank paying agent fees 181.25 AMI frozen drain line 65.00 Bennett Office binders 21.45 Carquest floordry 17.70 Central Garage Dec repairs 366.46 Coast to Coast supplies 331.68 Com of Revenue Dec sales tax 4,177.98 County Market water 30.24 Curtin Scientific cartridge system 440.81 Dostal & Oleson fuel 23.38 Family Rexall supplies 91.14 Farm & Home supplies 124.91 Fitzloff Hardware supplies 21.97 Floor Care cleaning supplies 182.78 Forbes Auto gas cap 3.31 G & K uniforms 234.03 Gopher. State 1 Call Dec service 68.75 Hutch Wholesale tools 159.50 Hutch Lez.der recycling ads 136.77 Hutch Utilities electricity 14,332.11 Hutch Cenex gasoline 341.28 Junker Dec refuse service 55,487.52 Contracting repairs 2,309.75 • Juul LTP well maintenance 3,879.47 Mid American Plastics parts 35.64 Mid America Plastics pipes 71.61 MN Valley Testing tests 80.00 Nalco Chemical chemicals 774.40 PERA employer contribution 411.41 Quade Electric supplies 42.70 Quast Transfer freight 36.15 Schmeling Oil part 35.25 Tri County Water salt 17.20 US Postmaster meter postage 114.73 Waldor Pump service checks 700.02 Zee Medical supplies 75.70 TOTAL $86,691.90 • 11-4 CENT GARA 1990 *Withhold Tax Acct Brandon Tire Brandon Tire Carquest Champion Auto Coast to Coast Crow River Glass Crysteel Farm & Home G & K Hutch Wholesale Jerabek Machine Jerry's Transmission Juul c;ontr K -Mart Northern States Supply PERA Plowmans RMS Schmeling Oil US Postmaster WD Cooling C J employer contribution 97.24 repair 6.75 repairs 38.25 supplies 1,501.77 supplies 65.47 supplies 24.96 mirror 6.50 lever bracket 18.37 supplies 53.87 uniforms 54.00 supplies 329.97 blades 185.26 heater core 99.00 haul loader 350.00 protector 11.47 parts 4.89 employer contribution 56.94 iepair 23.80 repair 459.37 oil 203.15 meter postage 5.00 test radiators 156.75 TOTAL $3,752.78 2 n U 3 GENERAL FUND 1990 • *DNR *DNR *US Postmaster *Withhold Tax Acct A & B Electric Adv Fiberglass Prod Albinson Allen Office American Welding AMI ATC Automation Supply Barton, S. & UBC Barton, S. & UBC Barton, S. & Portele Elec Bennett office Bennett Office Bernhagen, John Biermann, Laurence Brunson Instrument Camera Shop Cargill Carney's Carquest Cash Wise • Cash Wise Central Garage Champion Auto Clarey's Safety Equip Coast to Coast Coast to Coast Country Kitchen County Treasurer County Treasurer County Market Crow River Press Cty Recorder Culligan Water Curtis Industries Ed Davis Business Mach Erickson's Auto Ericksons More 4 Ericson, Kurt Family Rexall Farm & Home Farmers Elevator Fitzloff Hardware Floor Care G & K Gall's • Glencoe Uniforms Gopher Sign Great Plains Greenbriar Floral registration fees 1,037.00 watercraft registrations 169.00 newsletter 187.28 employer contribution 4,321.49 service call 32.00 probe 15.45 paper 29.47 pens & pencils 3.2.76 oxygen 11.50 kitchen sink line 38.00 LP Training 300.00 ribbons 40.83 small cities grant 300.79 small cities grant 544.53 small cities grant 98.17 su;plies 8.56 calculator & toner 188.45 Dec compensation 1,960.00 Sr. Holly Ball singing 25.00 parts 53.63 film developing 11.83 salt 411.00 paper 4.99 supplies 10.96 coffee & bakery. 54.89 coffee 13.93 Dec repairs 17,845.38 bed mat & needle 76.98 coat, pants & boots 914.05 supplies 401.14 supplies 12.31 meal 6.25 DL fees 49.50 DL fees 66.00 groceries 12.23 insert sheets 221.92 recording fees 10.00 salt 23.60 wire ties 268.80 bindings 29.41 car rental 265.00 groceries 9.82 refund ski trip 21.00 supplies 82.63 parts 82.98 weighing 2.50 supplies 391.02 supplies 683.78 uniforms 676.44 helmets 699.42 hoods 169.4' signs 219.60 supplies 154.42 pointsettas 27.90 Grina, Lisa . Hanson & Vasek Hassan Valley Township Hasson Valley & Miller Heiman Huhn, Larry Hutch Telephone Hutch Utilities Hutch Leader Hutch Hospital Hutch Cenex Hutch Wholesale • meeting expenses curb & basin repairs roadside mowing Bldr small cities grant IRS I.T.L. Patch Jack's Uniforms Jayco Aviation Juul Construction K -Mart Krueger, Harold L & P Supply Lake Jennie Repair Larson, Quentin. Madson, Steve Mangan, Connie McLeod Coop Power Merrill, Ken MN Conway Fire Moon, Dolf Motorola Nat'l Soc Prof Engineers Nordby, Brett Northern States Supply Olson's Locksmith PERA Peterson Bus Pikal, Wally Pikal Music Powell, Robert Quade Electric Quade Electric Rannow Electric Rite Way Auto Schlueter Refrig Schmeling Oil Seven West Wash Sewing Basket Sid's Simplex Standard Printing State Treasurer bags expenses Telephone electricity ads & pubs laundry gasoline supplies fed excise tax 3 yrs emblem emblems aviation fuel repairs supplies Sr. Holly Ball music cap & files repairs expenses meeting expenses expenses electricity reg4stration fee gloves & hoods meeting expense pagers license -Huhn refund ski trip supplies service charge employer contribution bus trips Sr. Holly Ball music recorder refund cond use perr.it parts double payment heater repair washes service call kerosene wash alterations groceries service call supplies 4th qtr surcharge 32.89 3,160.50 30.00 2,994.25 41.59 20.88 2,488.42 3,996.34 436.86 14.40 3,978.88 129.47 1,977.02 104.00 15.39 5,643.71 692.30 25.39 65.00 6.00 272.00 26.60 29.85 12.14 721.60 10.00 227.57 6.03 3,072.00 20.00 33.00 75.34 25.00 4,949.94 664.20 65.00 70.00 45.00 17.18 (32.00) 98.50 12.75 56.90 14.88 7.50 8.48 83.03 866.80 8.14 3,700.22 • Tri County Water • Tri County Water Underground Bar & Grill United Lab Up & Away Balloons US Postmaster Xerox Zieman, Sharon C service 56.00 salt 22.00 meal- G.Plotz 14.08 cleaner 131.62 Sr. dinner 16.00 meter. postage 675.27 contract payment 329.80 supplies 7.20 TOTAL $75,577.94 �J M BOND FU 1990 • RURAL FIRE DEPT Cl.arey's Safety Equip Homan, Ed Precht, Bruce Henke, Orlin Reynolds, Jo'in Brodd, Jim Schramm, Steve Redman, Randy Emans, Brad Hutch Cenex Hutch Fire & Safety Wigen Motor pike pole rural mileage rural mileage rural mileage rural mileage rural mile-sge rural mileage rural mileage rural mileage gasoline wet water repair YOUTH CENTER *Withhold Tax Acct FERA iorthland Beverages Plaza OK Hutch Utilites Frito Lay • Hutch Telephone TOTAL employer contribution employer contribution supplies supplies electricity supplies telephone TOTAL 1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV Hasson Lodge & Miller Bldrs 8% HCDC loan S.Barton & Portele Electric 8% HCDC loan S.Barton & UBC 8% HCDC loan S.Barton & UBC 8% HCDC loan TOTAL BURNS MANOR CONST Lundeen Floor covering partial pymt 1990 TAX INC CO NST Hutch Utilites City of Hutch County Recorder Roger I:ies Laurie Soregaroli Kent Anderson electricity utilities recording fees relocation expenses relocation expenses relocation expenses TOTAL • BON OF 1989 CONST 69.50 3.25 38.75 8.25 15.50 51.75 33.00 53.75 10.75 6.39 158.80 195.19 644.88 58.21 34.08 146.76 7.06 194.74 33.45 7.4.75 $499.05 1,135.75 37.24 206.55 114.10 $1,493.64 8,617.93 20.48 121.51 58.00 150.00 2,658.00 1,300.00 $4,307.99 Du_ninck Bros proj 89 -15 4,694.83 7 • • BON OF 199 CONST Gopher Sign Co signs 2,445.15 Wm Mueller proj 90- 17,109.51 TOTAL $19,554.66 LIOUOR FUND City of Hutch lottery sales 555.00 Am Linen Supply towel service 21.20 Coast to Coast supplies 149.58 Coca Ccla supplies 393.92 Cloudy Town Dist part 30.00 Hutch Leader adv 225.00 Hutch Telephone telephone 75.38 Hutch Utilities electricity 497.53 Junker sanitation refuse charge 121.28 KDUZ adv 204.00 Sprent.ler Trucking Nov freight charges 614.57 City of Hutch lottery sales 539.00 City of Hutch lottery sales 253.00 City of Hutch payroll 12 -14 4,809.44 Withhold Tax employer contribution 342.54 PERA employer contribution 197.14 Com of Revem_,e Nov sales tax 7,824.61 City of Hutch transfer 60,000.00 Cite of Hutch lottery sales 726.00 City of Hutch lottery sales 111.00 City of Hutch payroll 12 -28 5,025.67 Withhold Tax employer contribution 352.26 Lenneman Bros beer 16,570.90 PERA employer contribution 201.88 Griggs Cooper wine & liquor 11,549.97 Quality Wine wine & liquor 10,872.76 Johnson Bros wine & liquor 17,158.42 Ed Phillips wine & liquor 13,366.18 TOTAL $152,788.23 • WATER & SEWER FUND 1991 U of M reg- R.DeVries 150.00 Radisson Hotel Metrodome lodge- R.DeVri_es 66.00 League of MN Cities 3rd qtr W Comp 1,901.00 TOTAL $2,117.00 CENT GARAGE FUND 1991 Motor Vehicle tax & license 769.84 Wigen Motor 1991 Lumina 12,464.06 TOTAL $13,233.90 GENERAL FUND 1991 League of MN Cities 3rd qtr w.comp 57,223.00 Dept Labor & Ind license renewal 25.00 Turf Supply fertilizer 2,600.83 Pioneerland Library 1st qtr 15,001.00 Star Cablevision Jan service 4.05 Security State Bank pymt r9 2.0.71 Midcontinent Theatre 50 tic'.ets 150.00 MDRA 1991 dues 210.00 Local Gov Records booklet 5.00 Chanhassen Theatre 46 reservations 100.00 Nat'l Bus W. reg- M.Swanson 69.00 • TOTAL $75,618.59 P • (612) 587 -5151 f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 January 4, 1991 FOR YOUR INFORMATION M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: HAZEL SITZ, TRANSIT COORDINATOR -S RE: NEW YEARS EVE SERVICE OF HUTCHMOBILE The Hutchmobile prcvided free service for party -goers on NE:w Years Eve from 7 p.m. to 2 a.m. This was publicised similar to previous years, with notices to all bars and news releases in the Hutchinson Leader and KDUZ Radio. A total of 31 rides were pros -ided during the evening. By comparison, fi.gures for prior years are listed. 1987 84 rides 1988 69 rides 1989 (No service - New fears eve was a Sunday) Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions abort this service. 11 1 0 • December 31, 1990 ARw OLD & MGDOWELL ArronNnys At LAw seal GEDAR LA ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35416 -1492 (612)545.9000 MN TOLL PEER 500. 343.4545 CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS TELECOPIEN (619) 915 -1793 Marquette Bank Hutchinson 308 Main Street South Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attn: Lou Ann Re: Chalupsky Assessment Matter Our File No. 3188 -90 -0144 Dear Lou Ann: W COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CANE20M CHARLES CLAYTON GARY W. DECREE 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 66371 (614) 369 -4914 TELEC0PIER(612) 399.660E 101 PAEI PLACE HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55360 (519) 557 -n7B TELECOPIER(SIR) 557.4096 rc� i n, FOR YOUR INFORMATION This letter is a follow -up to our telephone conversation of last week regarding the above - referenced matter. As I told you over the telephone, the Court of Appeals has recently decided the matter of Blankenburg V. City of Northfield (Court of Appeals File No. C7- 90 -496) and I am enclosing a copy of the Blankenburo decision. As you can see from the case, the Court of Appeals has clearly upheld the right of a city to assess property long after the project was completed and in fact before the property even came into the city as a result of the extension of city limits. Thus, it appears to me that the property located at 1205 Jefferson Street South, formerly owned by Mr. and Mrs. Chalupski, is in fact subject to the assessment and the full amount of the assessment is owed. There is a question regarding interest. That issue was not addressed in the Blankenburq decision. However, the city indicated quite some time ago that it was willing to accept the full prinipal amount of the assessment and I have no reason to doubt that the offer made at that time still stands. I made that offer in correspondence dated April 11, 1990. For a variety of other reasons, I would not expect any litigation to be successful with respect to this matter. .CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION DAVID E ARNOLD • OHARLRS R. CARMICHAEL" OART D. MCDOWELL STEVEN A- ANDERsoN O. BARRY ANDERSON' STEVEN S. ROOF LAURA R. PRETLAND DAVID A. DHUEOOEMANII PAUL D. DOVE JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT JAMES UTLET JULIA A CHRISTIANS RICHARD O. McOEE TIMOTHY W. PAPINSSI 1 0 • December 31, 1990 ARw OLD & MGDOWELL ArronNnys At LAw seal GEDAR LA ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35416 -1492 (612)545.9000 MN TOLL PEER 500. 343.4545 CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS TELECOPIEN (619) 915 -1793 Marquette Bank Hutchinson 308 Main Street South Hutchinson, MN 55350 Attn: Lou Ann Re: Chalupsky Assessment Matter Our File No. 3188 -90 -0144 Dear Lou Ann: W COUNSEL WILLIAM W. CANE20M CHARLES CLAYTON GARY W. DECREE 501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 66371 (614) 369 -4914 TELEC0PIER(612) 399.660E 101 PAEI PLACE HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55360 (519) 557 -n7B TELECOPIER(SIR) 557.4096 rc� i n, FOR YOUR INFORMATION This letter is a follow -up to our telephone conversation of last week regarding the above - referenced matter. As I told you over the telephone, the Court of Appeals has recently decided the matter of Blankenburg V. City of Northfield (Court of Appeals File No. C7- 90 -496) and I am enclosing a copy of the Blankenburo decision. As you can see from the case, the Court of Appeals has clearly upheld the right of a city to assess property long after the project was completed and in fact before the property even came into the city as a result of the extension of city limits. Thus, it appears to me that the property located at 1205 Jefferson Street South, formerly owned by Mr. and Mrs. Chalupski, is in fact subject to the assessment and the full amount of the assessment is owed. There is a question regarding interest. That issue was not addressed in the Blankenburq decision. However, the city indicated quite some time ago that it was willing to accept the full prinipal amount of the assessment and I have no reason to doubt that the offer made at that time still stands. I made that offer in correspondence dated April 11, 1990. For a variety of other reasons, I would not expect any litigation to be successful with respect to this matter. .CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION "CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Marquette Bank Hutchinson Attn: Lou Ann December 31, 1991 Page 2 As always, I would be happy to answer any questions you may have regarding this subject. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Best personal regards. Very truly yours, ARNOLD & Mc L G. Barry Anderson GBA /kt Enclosure ✓ cc: Gary D. Plotz {w /enclosure} • 0 • 416 Minn. 461 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER, 2d SERIES vided additional protection up to the UIM coverage limit whenever the liable party did not carry enough insurance to fully compensate damages. As part of the 1985 Amendment to the No -Fault Act, the legislature enacted the scheme at issue in this caae.l Under this approach, the amount paid to UIM claimant from any legally liable person or organisation must be offset against the amount of UIM coverage avail. able. Id at 89. In effect, UIM coverage became a floor of protection to make up for the deficiency in coverage of the underis, cured vehicle. Unlilre the add an attutry scheme, benefit were not available for all uncompensated amount up to the UIM coverage limit because the UIM coverage limits were offset by the arrant paid to the UIM claimant from the trt.fazzor or Other legally liable emotions. (51 Under the limitrine -paid statutory eehsme, the application of the setoff provi. sion his not been addressed in the context of multiple UIM claimant. However, the law is settled regarding the application of the setoff provision in the context of only one UIM claim L UIM coverage compeo- iota the UIM insured only in situations where the applicable personal liability car. stage limit, or the amount actually paid to the injured party under such corerage, was king than the injured party's own UIM mv. ers9L Thus, UIM benefit an not aysl} able when the Ulm per person coverage limits equal to the tort - tessera per person bodily injury liability coverage limit, and the Ulm claimant has received the full per person recovery under the Lability policy. Brotoq 428 N.W.2d 85. 90; Ballasance r. Sglico Iris. Ca 152 N.W.2d 185, 188 (Mim.App.1988), pet Jor rtm denied (]dim. Jan. 26, 1989); 76ompeon o. Alf - state Ira Co., 412 N.W.2d $86, 588 (Minn, App.1981), pet Jos rem, denied (Minn. Nov. 15, 19871. 141 In this caee, the per accident limit most be considered because mom than one UIM claimant is involved. The appellant' 560,000 per accident &M 230,000 per person UIM coverage limits are identical to the coverage limit of the tort - fervor's bodily injury Lability policy. The appellant re. covered the full per accident amount of 560,000 in a settlement with respondent an NorthenscoM's insurer. Since the method of calculating UIM benefit advocated by appellants would result in the additional recovery of 560,000 in UIM benefit, th method is inconsistent with the statute u it his been applied in the context of one UIM claimant. The trial court's determination that UIM benefit are not available to appellant is also supported by the legislative history of the limit -ins -paid statutory scheme. In Brofm4 the interpretation of thi statutory scheme was based in part on the legisla- run's intent to counteract rising automo- bile insurance rats. Brolon, 428 N.W.2d at 88. A major objective of the 1985 amendment was to eliminate the add -on bass of calculating UIM benefit. Id While appellants do not advocate a pure add-on method of calculating UIM benefits, their approach is more consistent with the sdd-o11 atstutsry scheme than with the list- Its-less-paid scheme that controls in thi cue. Appellants do not advocate compl recovery of all uncompensated damages up to the UIM per accident limit, which would have occurred under the add-on UIM atat- tory scheme. Appellants contend that the setoff provision should he rust applied to offset the per person UIM limit by the amount of each claimant's individual near. try, with the total amount of UIM benefits limited to the UIM per accident limit However, the result in still adding on UIM coverage for each indwidal's uncompen- mind damages up to the UIM per person limit, and in the aggregate up to the UIM Per accident limit This is inconsistent with the porpoise of the 8mits less-paid statutory scheme. The trial court did not rule on an sltems Uve argument for declaratory judgment put forward by respondent bemuse the court found the setoff provision was dia positive. For the same reason, we do not 1. The legiale m spin amcidd the mots In 1999. See 1919 Minn.lawa ch. 211, f S. BLANKENBURC Y. CITY OF NORTHFIELD Minn. 417 M sea a ILr]11111a11..Are twat addmu the merits of the alternative argu- ty's intent to assess deferred coals; and (3) menL special assessment was not a taking. Affirmed. DECISION Pursuant to Minn.SUL 1 668.49, subd. 41 (1986), the total amount paid to UIM insureds from the liable party should be directly offset against the UIM per acci- dent limit. The $60,000 appellant recov. ered from respondent in its opacity as the tort- feuor's insurer must therefore be off- set against the appellant' UIM par aces dent limit of 560,008. The trial court cos rectly, determined that no UIM benefit are available, and we affirm the grant of sum mary ]udgsenL v Affirmed, O in mass tulle . 1. Appeal and Error 4-8931) Statutes 4-176 Interpretation of a statute is a ques- tion of law and is subject to de novo review on appeal. 2. " Municipal Corporations 4'•176 -; Statute authorizing municipality to do- fen asenement of previous special improve- ment cost until assessment is merle for subsequent extension or improvement is W limited to property within munieipsS- tfi flvisdirtion at lima of original improve- ment M.S.A. 1429.051. 5. Statutes 4-188 Court of Appeals will not contradict plain meaning of statute when construing and applying statute. MS.A. 1 665.16. „ 4. Constitutional Law 4-290151 ;.. Municipal Corporations 4-466 . 16a.Ct C9srt K property owner challenged special sr tenement "levied by municipality which In, eluded deferred cats for Improvement made before municipality jurisdiction over property. The District Court. Rift County, lawrena T. Gallagher. J.. held that particular statute authorized deferred assessments and that special assessment was not a taking, Property owner sppeal- ed. The Court of Appeals, Klaphaka, J., held that: 0) statutory authorization fa deferred create of special improvement was not limited to property within municipals ly's jurisdiction at time of original improve- Avant; (2) property owner's due procns rights were got violated because notice of aesenment hearings outlined, municipals Property owner's due process rights were not violated by municipality's inclu- sion of deferred cat in spacial assessment where .dices of feasibility and auemmenl hearings included statement outlining mu. nicipality's intent to assets deferred rates; Was, property owner had opportunity to object to extension of original improvement goal * to Inclusion of deferred cats. U.S. Cal Corot.Amamd 14; MS.A. 1 429.051. S Constitutional Iew 4-290(5) Due proses don not attach W fu- sibility, hearing with teepect to a proposed improvement. batause it s s legislative function; due process does attach, how- ever, at assessment hearing because as assistant bosoms a Ism on afteeted prop erty. US.CA Cost.Ameld. 14. A. Eminent Domain 4-1(11) Where municipality levies an aaaosa- ment that exceeds the benefit to the se, ",and property, the excess assessment Is a taking without just compensation. U.S. CA. Const-Amend. 14. 1 .j { l a! 418 M'An 462 NOIt7'B WgMM" R"OR Eat. U SERI 'endnenl Domain o307(4) When special Assessment is chalkuged Al R taking, the trial court must conduct An independent review of all evidence and make a specific fm&lr As to whether the asResa t exceeded bimsfit to the Ae sessed property. US.C.A- CoeetArAM& 14., A Municipal Corpontlons "Isle) Upon review of trial court funding as to whether special Azaesameut exceeded bene- fit te affected Property . appellat court will determine whether evidences sufficient to amlain trial ounRy finding, 9 Domain 4­2(j I) _. . - :. For purposes of determining whether aPedal "Hisment is a taking, the spc W benefit to the assessed land in measured by MacLeod market wa)ue caused by improve. Met "market value" is determined by Price a willing buys wo pay A Willing seller for prop" before, and then after. haprovement has been constructed, for. 9 er P icatou Words and pbrse _�r, g ddidnana� aw �vzbr d . "sx'�... Sytlabur by W Cant 1. A municipality may defer special InProvemeat costa until benefited property is amesed. provided the deferred coat@ an included in the notice of boarings on the p"nuncnla. hlneSlat 9 429.061 X. Where the evidence lopperta the trial Were, daterminstion of the benefit t the property, and the special assessmeat dose not e:esed the bem6t, there in on tsl®g without just eompeosetion Sharon A. Jontad, WR..mingo, p>raRltBu D. Petersen. Kenyon. fee appe0ant MAron L Swanson, Northfield, for re . spoodent Considered Rod decided by FOLEY, PJ, Rod SCBUMACBEE and KLAP J]. OPINION XLA- PIfAKE, Judge. Joyce Blankenburg appeals the denial of a motion for A new trial and challenge the special assessment levied against her prop- erty. We affirm. FACTS .In 1971, the City of Northfield (City) ertendod sanitary sewer and water lines to the edge of the City bounded by the Gun- drraon-Lhnerem Addition (Addition), Blankenburg's home is looted m the Addl tine. In 1988, the City constructed A san4 tap sewer subtrunk abutting the Addition. 710 City conducted appropriate feasibility and assessment hearings for these im. Proeementa. Anticipating the eventual an- oexatioo of the Addition, the City deferred A portion of the 1973 and 1983 Assessments until the improvements were extended in the Addition Blankenburg did not receive notice of One feasibility or ARaeasment hest fogs for the 1979 improvements, whether she received notice of the 1983 hearings is unclear. V January 1986, the City annexed the Addition. In April 1986, the City held feasibility hearing about extending sew.,r and water Imes to the Addition, regrading and Mac'Hnpping pads in the Addition. e endruchng a storm sewer, And came. wr—bug We main Aroma road to the Addi. tick The City held the Assessment hearing And Adopted the assessment coll in May 1985' 7M aRRessmeot roll Included de fared costs from the 1979 And 1989 im. Provemmta Blankenburg received appro prate notice of the feasibility and the As. seaamsnt bearings. 7Ilw Wessment Against BlAnkenburea property was $9.414.23 Blankenburg challenged the apKW As- Reasmeet in district court The trial nun held that Mmn.Stet 1 429.061 (1988) Rutho- rized the deferred sasessmente provided that the earlier enprovernent benefited th "Reseed Property. The trial cou Also sc oePted the City', method of determining the benefit to BlankenburA s property And I2] Section 429.051 (1988) provides that To the extent that such as impnvenent benefits naubutting Properties which MY be served by the improvement when one or mom later extensions or improve- ments are made but which an not initial IY aasnsed therefor, the municipality may also reimburse itself by adding all Or Any of the portion of the cost so paid W the Assessments levied for any of such later exten kma or improvements, provid. ed that notice that such Additional amount will be Assessed is included in the notice of hearing on the making of such extensions or tmprovemenla. Ills Additional assesamente Main authorized MY be nude whether or rut tbA proper- ties wnsed wen included in the Ana described in the notice of hearing on th making of the original improvement Bisnkenburg claims the statutory deferal provision is limited t property within the municipality's jurisdiction at the time of the original improvement We disagree. Blankenburg received notice of both the 1986 feasibility and assessment hearings. Ills entities Included a statement outlining the intent to asses deferred costs. Block - enhurg therefore had an opportunity t Object to the extension and to the inclusion of the deferred coats. And she did object Thus, section 429,661 provided Blank.. burg adequate notice And a proome to pro- test her interests. 151 We take this opportunity t reit. evote that due promise don not attach at the feasibility hearing because it i A logi► lative function. Village of Edi" w. Jo srph, 264 Mim. 84, 95,119 N,W.2d 809, 817 (1962). C/ fa n Channel fans, 444 N.W.2d 602, 604 (Mim.App.1989) (suiting that once proposed project is rejected, mu- nicipality, must give new notice and hold new hearing before rrmnsidering same Prr*O; JndePendenf School Diat No, 2S4 0. City of Kenyon, 411 N.W.2d 545, 648 (Minn.App.1987) (holding that once Project is adopted, municipality must give 7 13LANKENBURG v. CITY OF NOWMFIELD Minn. 419 ca. ww KIrSt found the special assessment did 417 0 reel 7 110 net ex. coed the benefit to the property. (2) authorization for deferred costs is not statutorily limited to areas originally Within the municipality jurisdiction. Nor -. .. ISSUES doe the statute require the assessed prop, I. Did the City exceed its authority or erty be included in the notice of the crig6ul improvement violate due process when improvement We will not contradict the plain meaning of the statute. See Mine. Costs previously deferred were added to the Stet 1 646.16 (1988) (unambiguom Ism- special assessment for extension of -jet- ing gunge shall not be disregarded), improvemenlai policy considerations also support defer 2 Did the special asRessmenl levied e:- ral authorization. Municipalities reason- teed the benefit to Blankenburg's proper ably consider Power expansion when mak. ty ing improvemeinte. Since these considers, tim s often add to the cost of the improve ANALYSIS trout. the municipality is justified in rein- : burning itself when that expansion oaun. ` 1. Deferred assessment@. Limiting deferred Ass e ss m en t s to property j ]I] Blankenburg argues that the City w1p the corpon4 limits at the original exceeded its authority when it deferred a Assessment would allow owners to reap the portion of the 1978 and 1989 asaessments benefit of the improvements without shoe until it annexed and connected the Addition mg the cost Section 479.061 ensures that 1 te the existing improvem ents. 77e inter• warty owners contnlute to the overall Pretation of a statute is a question of law cost of the imProrement when they receive and is subject to de novo re . on appeal. the benefit Hibbing Edue Ass% a Public, Employ 141 Blankenburg also argues that incle. ment Relations Bd, 969 N.W.2d 571, 529 sine of deferred coats for 1973 And 19gt (Minn.1985). violates her due prone rights. Again, we disagree. _ I2] Section 429.051 (1988) provides that To the extent that such as impnvenent benefits naubutting Properties which MY be served by the improvement when one or mom later extensions or improve- ments are made but which an not initial IY aasnsed therefor, the municipality may also reimburse itself by adding all Or Any of the portion of the cost so paid W the Assessments levied for any of such later exten kma or improvements, provid. ed that notice that such Additional amount will be Assessed is included in the notice of hearing on the making of such extensions or tmprovemenla. Ills Additional assesamente Main authorized MY be nude whether or rut tbA proper- ties wnsed wen included in the Ana described in the notice of hearing on th making of the original improvement Bisnkenburg claims the statutory deferal provision is limited t property within the municipality's jurisdiction at the time of the original improvement We disagree. Blankenburg received notice of both the 1986 feasibility and assessment hearings. Ills entities Included a statement outlining the intent to asses deferred costs. Block - enhurg therefore had an opportunity t Object to the extension and to the inclusion of the deferred coats. And she did object Thus, section 429,661 provided Blank.. burg adequate notice And a proome to pro- test her interests. 151 We take this opportunity t reit. evote that due promise don not attach at the feasibility hearing because it i A logi► lative function. Village of Edi" w. Jo srph, 264 Mim. 84, 95,119 N,W.2d 809, 817 (1962). C/ fa n Channel fans, 444 N.W.2d 602, 604 (Mim.App.1989) (suiting that once proposed project is rejected, mu- nicipality, must give new notice and hold new hearing before rrmnsidering same Prr*O; JndePendenf School Diat No, 2S4 0. City of Kenyon, 411 N.W.2d 545, 648 (Minn.App.1987) (holding that once Project is adopted, municipality must give 420' Minn. 662 NORTH WEMRN REPORrM 24 BF.RIP9 new hotbe and hold new bearing before chaR8mg project fmandn(d. Due process does attach, however; N the assessment hearing because the assessment bewares ■ lies on the affected property: Meador brook Jfanor, Inc a City of SL Louis Park 268 Minn. 266, 270, 106 N.W.2d 610, 668 (1960). 2.1 Lhessaive assessment .. (441 Bhnkenbwg also chins the spe- cial'assestment exeeds the benefit to her property. Where a municipality lni e an asw t that exceeds the benefit to the property, the exmesassmment r a taking without Jut compensation, Qualify H00144 !ae A Vfllaps of Ner BripAfs, 299:11['ma. 274. 280. 188 N.W2d 666. Ism (1971 } - When a special aaaes®mt is that, ien'ged as a taking. the trial court most ONAud as Independent review of all the evideafe and make a specific finding as to whether the assessment exceeded the beno- fit Buettner v. City of SL Qord 277 N.W2d 199, 200 (Mma1979). Upon m virw, the appellate Court wit deters ew whether the evidence in saffident On saa- tam the trial court's finding& Carhpre- Lasp Realty Ca v. City of Windom, 807 limn. 968. 976, 210 N.W2d 617, 621 (19761. (91' The special benefit to the assessed land's measured by the increased market valoo caused by the improvement. Id at 969, 240 N.W2d at 619. Market value is determined by the price a "willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the property before, and then after,' the improvement has been wutructed." Id Blankenbures apprauer act the value of the benefit to the Property at 98,600. The (Sty's appnior calculated the benefit at 812,600. After bearing all the testimony, the trio court found the We apprahr) marI accurata and determined that the u sessment (99.61424) did not exceed the bewlt (912,600) to the property. We hold Uee is sufficient evidence in the rsco to support the trial courts finding. DECISION MineStat 9 429.061 authorizes a munke Poky to defer assessments until benefited property is annexed. Due proms is sati, fied when information about the deferred costs is included in the notice of the Present improvement Here, the special sasasmeent did not exec«t the benefit t Blankenbur$s property. Daniel S. RYAN. et &L. Appellant,, v- QTY /COON RAPBDS, Rapmdeat -. No. CO-WI26L. Coot of Appeal of MionaoW Nov. 6. 1990, Bidder sought to enjoin city from resol- icisiag hilt The District Court. Anoka County. Edward M. Bearse. J.. permitted city so reject bids. Bidder appealed. The Court of Appeal, Device, J, held that ash's expseaa reaereetion of right to reject all bids gave the right reasonably to reject bids in expectation of getting lower bids AfCnnod. . Maaidpak Ccrporellom 4-240 We espress reservation of right to reject all Aids gin the right reasonably to reject lids in expectation of getting lower bids.. - - Syllabus by Ue Court L' A public body may reject an hide when the imitation to bid expressly re- se oes the right to rejert 2 In reviewing whether rejection of bids was eMbarT, espricioua, or unre , able, the court focuses on whether the ron- b-1— were glen an equal opportunity to bid sod whether the process gin taxpay en the beat bargain. .. - RYAN v. CITY OF COON RAPID8 , Mien 421 0W .412 K ►M d pr.Ap,. new ... H.T. Fabywke, Holly A.R. Hart, Fs- allow It to withdraw the bid Minnesota byaaska, SvOboda, West, A Davis. P.A., law prohibits changing the amount of a bid Todd GodentaA Gen. Counsel, Associated after a bid opening, but the City did reject General Contracton of Minnesota, St Paul, A d. P's bid. for appellants, Alden G Hofttedt, City Arty, Coca Rap ids, for respondent _ .... Considered and decided by DAVIES,, . PJ., and PARKER and LANSING, JJ. OPINION DAVIES; Judge. �.., The trial court concluded that the City of Coon Rapids had sufficient cas,, to reject all bids and to rabid a pmjetL' it denied Daniel Ryan's motion for a pemaxot in- junction against rebidding. Ryan appeals challenging the City's authority to reject all bids. We affirm. FACTS On Deesmber 16, 1989, the City of Coon Rapids (City) issued an invitation to bid on the wrutrnction of two water treatment plants. The instructions stated in relevant Pam Owner shall award a contract m the Bid. der whom, In Owner's judgment is the lowest resPOrnaive, responsible Bidder. Owner reserves the right to reject all Bids, to award the contract by sections, to wain informalities, and to reject ton• conforming, snreapoasive, or wndibon- sl Bids. The bide were opened on January 80, 1990. Adolfson A Peters, Ire. (A A P) submitted the lowest bid of 86,984,200. The second lowest bid was submitted by appellant Knutson Coastrnetion Company (Knutson). A A P's bid and Knutson'& bid Of 86,810,000 wen both leas than the all. mated cart of the project A day after its bid was submitted, A A P telegraphed th City that it had neglected to include a 8673,000 electrical subcontract in its bid. A A P asked the City either to attract its bid by adding the omitted amount or t t. lair Meocteed General Csrrouse, N Mlnaaaa ofllldad wish Ryas and Kmanum by 'A representative from A A P attended a chy'counel meeting and asked theta to njeft all bide and rebid the project The cOmim7 voted to do so; The stipulated , am' was that the second round of bide would be lower beesuas bidders would 'mow of the low njWW A A P bid ' the low bidder after A R P, Bought an Injunction against the City to stop it in, enolieiting bide. The trio court found that Knutson did not have standing to sue, an Knutson amended its complaint to include, as plaintiff, Daniel S. Ryan, a Knutson employee and citizen of Coon' Rapids.' After reviewing the or', draft, the trial wort denied R yan ' s motion for a Permanent )njunctipn b d entered Judgment for the City. Ryan appeals frorn the trial court decision and requests bid (reparation costs and attorney fen. ISSUE Did the City set properly when it njected ag bids and elsolkited bids for the project? ANALYSIS This court has stated the standard of review s follows; [ill is the appellate court's function t independently aslym the issue as the trial court's resolution of a Question of law is not binding on • reviewing court FOnnerr State Bank o. Wnnrs NafT MuL, 464 N.W.2d 661, 6S2 (Minn.App. 1090). The paramount purpose of the statutory bidding process is to protect the public interest by requiring contracts to be l to the lowest responsible bidder. Foley Bras., Inc. v. Marshall, 266 Minn. 269, 266, 128 N.W.2d 887, 891 (1969). TM City had as statutory authority to njeet all bids. The supreme court has said, however, that• proddtss towarasl. R, M! a ' inrtaee�i➢ia, a _, :n.z� wie..a.�. »�..tr :. .a,.0 >as7 _ ' .. 'i .0 ., _... e $ }' ` FOR YOUR INFORMATION LI u02__SL -aac .Lao' 2- ¢tsenJ_ _ `/ -N . -- . Llyuoe - .5ftfk 0c.,ipne.Se&) 0 -- -- fy n.- E.L,bc / "Icfi��- 'De«i.,btc Qfc --" c ---- p n; "TefwL_ Ltfoa.c_ BFf/L lv,n4 A/s'. 31916 . .7 __�!)4' I . - 9.T ICE I y f lk la l x Y t _ � 1 9 1 - LG5 3 a 34� zB.. It _.tY -_ /a Y_. -' - - - - 1 -,1 J�dBT.. _ [d7Y __.. XJ _ _ Si Y6� I " [. m� _ 1 -27 -91 - — Ys_t_ 9 a/ n _ lio7 _ I IIQe9 _33 [Ils _[J - rY - - • • __�d' _/ �(_ 0 _ _JO99' z 3 _s5'zl - 1 93 �i ro �ti x38 SI 3 G W SS ' [ -9 � . La 1 9L � _3 -J_ 6 Q- {{��- 9_ -3id7 _. b 77' I � r 9 _ T o/ t J 11 sIl — - fi t. II II �t11 a n 2 - 73 _ _Z 3 F 7 453 175 1;4i » a [ 73 1 l_- J... _ z / ao _ n » r 4 a °43 dIJB L B3t__ /95_€ Al E _ FCC S. _ 360 Jto IveBE ._ Er �r 9r - 4 as I �,S L . I _ Q y a j P •x. orft .IVOaY. SIi. GR[LV SS'. wMii[ AN�MY3Ap .. R{ b' WU► Rn�M *+art „ � 5 ak*F- r4!tg2"tYr�... _.may..... � � y S a 1 l l 1 l i ) ) 1 1 12/26/90 HUTCHTNSON U7 IES COMMISSION F'AGE 1 UTILITY PLANT - AT CO5T HUTCHIN#MINNESOTA LAND d LAND RIGHTS 770, 7.4.6.1 13,978.1.0 BALANCE SHF_ET NOVEMBER 30, 1990 . [.ir Full ,n � :f ) In ) - - .. t! � ^ =(Z J� ii \: - It MIAT ION L,� ^ a • • + E:I_ECTf.'IC * • • +t + * * * GAS +< • +e TOTAL * M * M ASSETS UTILITY PLANT - AT CO5T LAND d LAND RIGHTS 770, 7.4.6.1 13,978.1.0 784,732.78 DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT 21,.740,031.04 2,568,923.23 24,408,954.27 TOTAL UTILITY F'L_ANT 22,61.0,7135.72 2,582,901.33 25,193,687,05 LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (i2,341,491.15) (1,135,815.38) (1.3,477,306.53) TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEF'RECIAI'ION (1.2,341,491.,15) (1,135,815.30) (13,477,306.53) ' CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 1,43(7,364.51 80,299.52 1,518,654.03 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS 1,438,354.51 80,299.52 1,518,654.03 TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE 11,707,649.08 1,527,385.47 13,235,034.55 RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS FUTURE EXPANSION E DEVELOPMENT 2,800,000.00 1,210,000.00 4,010,000.00 RESERVE FOR FUEL OIL 750,000.00 .00 750,000.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE 60,000.00 40,000.00 100,000.00 ITA - OPERATING 6 MAINT RESERVE 200,000.00 .00 200,000.00 INSURANCE LOSS 300,000.00 .00 300,000.00 BOND h INTEREST PAYMLNT 19.16 27,915.71 .00 27,915.75 1986 BOND RESERVE 392,000.00 .00 392,000.00 CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND 750,000.00 .00 750,000.00 FEDERAL INTERF'F'F_TATION .0o 623,988.74 623,983.74 MAIN REPLACEMENT FUND .00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS & ACCOUNTS 5,279,915.75 2,873,988.74 8,153,904.49' CURRENT 8 ACCRUED ASSETS - CASH IN BANK 737,520.69 613,363.23 1,350,883.92 INVESTMENTS 6 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS i,425,4 ?0.81. 521,518.44 1,946,939.25 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 1,014,814.58 465,919.86 1,480,734.44 INVENTORIES 480,003.14 55,817.01 535,820.15 P'REP'AID INSURANCE_ 38,430.06 20,094.57 58,524.63 ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE 46,359.87 9,297.64 57,657.51 TREASURY BILL DISCOLIN'f (45,563.34) (34,807.SO) (60,370.84) TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS 3,698,985.81 1,651,203.25 5,350,109.86 DEFERRED CHARGE BOND DISCOUNT 1906 72,999.95 .00 72,999.95 CLEARING ACCOUNT 219.9) .00 219.90 TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE 73,219.85 .00 73,219.65 TOIAL ASSETS 20, 759, 770.49 6,052,577.46 26,812,347.95 ) 1 I � I ) ) • -- 12126190 HUTLHIN';ON UTILITIES COMMISSION PAGE 2 HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA BALANCE SHEET NOVEMBER 30, 1990 +� ELECTRIC GAS TOTAL M + • • ) MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LTABTLITIES MUNICIPAL EQUITY 1 MUNICIPAL EQUITY i5,737,i21.39 5,274,97.87 21,011,419.26 UNAPPROPRIAT - ED NETAINED EARNINGS 1,985„180.69 632,688.08 2,617,868.77 CONTRIBUTION TO CITY (2,,5,000.00) (165,000.00) (4 20,000.00) TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY 17,467,302.08 5,741,985.95 23,209,288.03 LONG TERM LIABILITIES -NET OF )- CUF!RENT MATURITIES 1986 BONDS 2,635,000.00 .00 2,635,000.00 TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES 2,635,000.00 .00 2,635,000.60 CONTRACT'S 6 ACCTS FAY RETAIN _ _ _CONSTR TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & ACCTS FAY .00 .00 .00 ) CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES _ NOTE PAYABLE - LEASE PAYABLE 2.685.83 .00 2,685.83 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 514,740.49 290,477.77 805,218.26 INTEREST ACCRUED 249.66 .00 249.66 _ ACCT PAYABLE TO ASSOCIATED COMPANY (18,818.76) .00 (18.818.76) ACCRUED PAYROLL 43,383.39 8,029.20 51,412.59 ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE 42,167.92 12,084.54 54,252.46 CUSTOMER DEPOSIT'S 73,059.78 .00 73,0`.9.78 OTHER CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES .10 .00 .10 TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIAB 657,466.41 310,591.5L 968,059.92__ TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY A LIAB 20,759,770.49 6,052,577.46 26,812,347.95 ) 1 I � I ) ) • 12/26/90 hUTCIIINSON UT TIES COMMISSION PAGE 1 . HUTCHIN.. MINNESOTA ELECTRIC DIVISION I STATEMENT OF OME 6 EXPENSES r.f:{ Y!� �� �� e, MAT ION NOVEMBER 30, 1990 f V J PF'EVIUUS CURRENT BUDGETED BUDGET ANNUAL YEAR TO DA(E YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE DEVIATION BUDGET INCOME STATEMENT OPERATING REVENUE SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY 8,341,1.96.54 8,665,448.1`; 8,686,548.45 (:1,100.30) 9,361,665.00 1 SALES FOR RESALE .00 3,267.26 .00 3,267.26 .00 NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES 21,067.53 32,969.51 19,140.50 13,829.01 22,100.00 SECURITY LIGHTS 11,845.50 12,.296.00 t3,650.00 (1,354.00) 15,000.00 POLE RENTAL 3,032.50 3,832.`:0 4,000.00 (167.50) 4,000.00 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 8,377,942.07 8,7t7,813.42 8,723,338.95 (5,525.53) 9,402,765.00 OPERATING EXPENSES PRODUCTION OPERATION 785,920.4`; 962,457.68 893,181.63 (69,276.05) 921,240.00 PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE 118,305.94 58,411.66 41,284.96 (17,126.70) 74,212.00 PURCHASED POWER 4,668,599.79 4,434,118.79 4,468,409.75 34,290.96 4,936,277.00 TRANSMISSION OPERATION 698.51 1,762_54 500.00 (1,262.54) 1,600.00 TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCF 16,309.83 30,100.44 11,000.00 (19,100.44) 11,000.00 DISTRIBUTION OPERATION 1- 8,564.0^ 143,807.32 365,263.13 21,455.81 161,753.80 DISTRIBUTION MAINTE =NANCE 83,687.16 90,003.95 90,141.70 137.83 i05,368.88 CUSTOMER EXPENSES 70,769.45 69,073.32 71,894.31 2,820.99 77,179.80 CUSTOMER SERVICES 8,862.35 10,043.73 9,347.57 (696.16) 10,160.40 ADMINISTRATIVE 6 GENERAL EXPENSES 564,644.7" 579,833.77 606,281.36 26,447.59 617,109.25 DEPRECIATION 874,500.00 617,100.00 628,480.00 11,380.00 902,088.00 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 7,320,862.2:; 6,996,713.20 6,985,784.49 (10,928.71) 7,897,891.45 OPERATING INCOME 1,057,079.02 1,721,100.22 1,737,554.46 (16,454.24) 1,504,873.55 1 OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS OTHER - NET 2,983.26 10,557.88 (2,400.00) 13,037.88 3,600.80 INTEREST INCOME 569,285.34 400,538.36 423,832.50 ( 23,294.14) 523,250.88 MISC INCOME /EXPENSF_ 81883.55 3,507.38 4,500.00 (992.62) 4,500.00 INTEREST EXPENSE 167,064.58 150,523.15 146,253.16 (4,269.99) 160,16200 TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS 413,287.57 264,080.47 279,599.34 (!5,518.87) 371,188.00 NET INCOME 1,470,367.39 1,985,180.69 2,017,153.80 (31,973.11) 1,876,061.35 1 I J 12/26/90 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES. COMMISSION HIIFCHINSUN, MINNESOTA GAS DIVISTON STATEMENT OF INCOME h EXFENSES NOVEMPT -R 30, 1990 FRF_VIOUS CURRENT BUDGET rD 1 YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE 1 INCOME STATEMENT OPERATING REVENUES SALES FORFEITED DISCOUN "TS i u ) TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE OPERATING EXPENSE MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE DISTRIBUTION OPERATION DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE CUSTOMER EXPENSES CUSTOMER SERVICES ADMINISTRATION h GENERAL DEPRECIATION TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING INCOME OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS OTHER - NET INTEREST INCOME MISC INCOME /EXPENSE TOTAL OTHER INCOME AND DEDUCTIONS NET INCOME 3,625,735.46 9,583.03 3,635,310.49 1,844,54 196.11 2,859,768.72 160,659.05 _2,063,66 46,368.90 5,916,23 212,465.43 78,100.00 3,387,382.64 247,935,85 1,029.73 234,59H.36 3,929.95 239,558.04 487,493.89 4,087.,5104.48 15,303.00 4,096,807.48 1,707,10 .00 3,135,627.65 181,244.16 19,467.05 44,622.64 6,695.81 244,551.53 83,600.00 3,717,515.94 379,291.54 3,526.48 206,197.41 43,672.6S 253,396.54 632,688.08 3, 9:76, `100.00 10,234.00 3,936,734.00 1,504.00 .00 3 162,877.52 25,050.24 46,916.10 6, ^_31.71 217,811.31 76,712.00 3,597,902.88 338,831.12 2,404.00 226,217.50 2,970.00 233,591.50 572,422.62 PAGE 2 BUDGET DEVIATION ANNUAL BUDGET 155,004.48 5,069.00 160.073.48 (203.10) .00 (75,627.65) (18,366,64) 6,383.19 2,293.46 (464.10) (26,740.22) (6,888.00) (119,613.06) 40,460.42 1,12^ -.48 (22,020.09) 40,702.65 19,805.04 60,265.46 4,400,000.00 11,900.00 4,411,900.00 2,800.00 13,000.00 3,600,000.00 174,709.00 32,270.00 51,453.20 6,773.60 243,075.75 89,200.00 4,213,281.55 198,618.45 2,400.00 281,750.00 3,000.08 287,150.00 485,768.43 • HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1990 The meeting opened at 9:00 p.m. Randy reported he is going to look back at old drills and what was done. He Is looking for Ideas if anyone has any. The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Submitted by, Bob Schantzen rI A G E N D A JOINT CITY COUNCIL /COUNTY MEETING MONDAY, JANUARY 14, 1991 - 7:00 P.M. VICTORIAN INN C� 1. REPORT BY PAUL MELCHIOR: Update On County Solid Waste Management Committee And Sub - Committee Activities: Regarding Recycling And 1991 Hutchinson Funding 2. REPORT BY ED HOMAN: Status Report On County's Comprehensive Planning 3. UPDATE ON HIGHWAY /ROADWAY PLANNING A. REPORT BY JOHN RODEBERG, CITY ENGINEER: Short And Long Range City /County /DOT Planning B. REPORT BY RICK KJONAAS. COUNTY HIGHWAY ENGINEER: Connector Road Between New County Road 7 And State Highway 22 4. DISCUSSION: Special Assessments And Delinquent Property Taxes On Lots In Paden's Addition (South of Hutchinson Mall) 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. ADJOURN LJ