Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp01-22-1991 cI U TC HI I N S
CO f
CAL�:U; °�R
� r f LVi� O
January 20 , n JanuarX_26
V! E. EJ Iv 7 S UD ;6 i
-23-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Me
at City Hall
5:00 P.M. - Tree Board
Meeting at
Library Co
Room
pia
lox
i
T HURSD.'.Y
-24-
5:00 P.M. - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
X7:00 P.M. - Hutcbinson Area
Transportation Task
Force Meeting at
City Hall Auditorim
{,7 ui'i L'rt 0
-21-
L CITY OFFICES CLOSED
++H- "+f++++i F 9 i� H i i
Y LUTHER KING'S BIRTHDAY
FiLiDAY
-25-
CONFERENCE:
RANDY DEVRIES - Jan. 24 -25
o -2
-2
7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at
City Hall
-26-
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 1991
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Harold Kelm, Bethany Baptist Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 8,
1991; Bid Openings of January 8, 1991 and January 17, 1991
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - December 1990
2. Planning Commission Minutes of December 18, 1990
3. Senior Advisory Board Minutes of November 28, 1990
0 4. Airport Commission Minutes - January 14, 1991
5. Hospital Board Minutes of December 18, 1990
6. Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting Minutes of
December 4, 1990 and January 8, 1991
(b) Snow Removal Permit
1. Jean Davison - Davison Northside Grocery
2. Donald Todnem
(c) Popcorn And Concession Stand Permit for Mark McGraw
(DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991)
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and
issue permits
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
(a) Letting No. 3 - Project No. 91 -03
•
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991 .
(b) Letting No. 4 - Project No. 91 -04, 91 -05, 91 -06
Action - Motion to close hearings - Motion to reject
Motion to approve and order preparation of plans and
specifications - Motion to waive readings and adopt
Resolutions
6. Communications. Recruests And Petitions
None
7. Resolutions And Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 9408 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
(b) Resolution No. 9409 - Resolution Approving securities
For Collateral From First Bank of Minnesota of
Hutchinson; Minnesota
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Amending Small Cities Grant Program
(DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991)
Action -
(b) Update On Luce Line Trail with Recommendation from City
Attorney (DEFERRED JANUARY 8, 1991)
Action -
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment
period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
0
2
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991
(b) Consideration of Awarding Contract for Demolition Or
Removal of Buildings for Shopko Project, Phase I
(Letting No. 15, Project No. 90 -25)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award
contract - Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
No. 9407
(c) Consideration of RCM Engineering Services Proposal for
Water Distribution System Analysis
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(d) Consideration of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
Amendment for $8,901,238 Requested By Hutchinson
Community Hospital
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration of Request By Nursing Home Board And
Hospital Board for Authorization To Continue with
Merger Process of Burns Manor And Hutchinson Community
Hospital
Action -
(f) Consideration of Deleting Area Four From Tax Increment
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9415
(g) Consideration of Entering Into County /City Contract for
Recycling
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into contract
(h) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of Wal -Mart
Subdivision with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to Reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9410
•
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991
(i) Consideration of Rezoning From R -2 To C -4 for Wal -Mart
Property with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second
reading for February 12, 1991
(j) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Robert Hantge To Construct A Twin Home with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9411
(k) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Randy Anderson for Child Care Facility At Hwy. 15 South
with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9412
(1) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Stacey Barclay, Auto Sales Store On Hwy. 7 East with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9413
(m) Consideration of Variance Requested By Bob Elliott with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9414
(n) Consideration of Final Plat for Houk's Subdivision,
Submitted By Galen Houk (Two Mile Radius - Hassan
Valley) with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County
(o) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Kevin Compton On Hwy. 15 North (Two Mile Radius) with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to refer to County
J
4
0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 22, 1991
(p) Consideration of Final Draft of Comprehensive Plan with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(q) Consideration of Awarding Car Impounding Contract
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into contract
(r) Consideration of Entering Into Lease for "Dry Dock"
Youth Center
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreement
(s) Consideration of Agreement Between City of Hutchinson
And Hutch, Inc.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreement
• 10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims. Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. Adiournment
i
4
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen
Craig Lenz, John Mlinar and Don Erickson. Absent: Alderman
Marlin Torgerson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D.
Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney G. Barry
Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Sherman Buschow.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of December 11, 1990, spe-
cial meeting of December 27, 1990 and bid opening of December
28, 1990 were approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - DECEMBER 1990
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 28,
1990
3. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 29, 1990
4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 20, 1990
5. FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 1990
(b) CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE
1. HUTCH BASEBALL ASSN. FOR AMERICAN LEGION
2. HUTCHINSON HOCKEY ASSN. FOR O'TOOLES
(c) POPCORN AND CONCESSION STAND PERMIT FOR MARK MCGRAW
(d) SNOW REMOVAL PERMIT
1. LLOYD CHRISTENSEN
2. RON HANSEN - HANSEN GRAVEL
(e) APPOINTMENTS
• 1. HEALTH BOARD: DR. ROBERT HEGRENES, DR. THOMAS
KLEINKAUF AND DR. GEORGE SMITH
CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
- JANUARY 8,
1991
.
2.
FIRE
CHIEF AND FIRE
DEPARTMENT OFFICERS
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to order the re-
port and minutes filed, issue licenses /permits except for
item (c), and ratify appointments.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to table item (c) until the next meeting.
5. PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 P.M.
(a) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 91 -01
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4185. He then explained the
process for public improvements and stated deferred
assessments were available for senior citizens. The
assessments were for a 10 -year period if not paid in
full.
Engineer Rodeberg reported that the project was for con- •
concrete curb and gutter, street, alley and parking lot
construction and replacement of some of the sewer and
water lines. The Glen Street assessments would be fig-
ured on the basis of a commercial street rather than a
residential street. The residential people would be
assessed for a 37' street. The additional cost would be
a deferred assessment, and an adjustment would be made if
the property changed from residential to commercial.
There would be no assessment for sidewalk.
Delores Brunner, 968 Hayden Avenue, commented on the old
picture in the lobby and stated her house at 125 Glen
S.W. was in the picture. Since the house is old, she
wondered how much tax was paid on the property and how
many streets it had paid for. She questioned how many
times the same house could be assessed. She inquired if
the duplex were to be sold as commercial property, would
it be assessed residential or commercial. Mrs. Brunner
asked if the alley behind her house would be paved.
The Mayor and Engineer did not think the house had been
assessed before. The previous policy was to tax the en-
tire City for every improvement done in town.
Louis Brunner, 968 Hayden Avenue, wanted to know where
the money was coming from to pave a parking lot next •
2
. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
door. He thought the money should be used for street
improvements instead of parking lot construction.
Engineer Rodeberg responded that a tax increment district
was set up to pay for this project. It would not affect
their taxes.
Mr. Brunner inquired who requested the blacktopping on
Glen Street. Engineer Rodeberg responded that the school
district had requested it.
Mr. Steve Drew, 15 Glen Street S., asked if the alley was
going to be paved or what would be done to it. He stated
the police station used the alley about 903 of the time
and only four houses used the alley. He stated it would
be nice to have it paved because of the traffic by the
police station, but he didn't think the residents along
there should pay for it to be done. Mr. Drew also
inquired about sidewalk assessment.
The City Engineer responded that the City set up an
assessment policy for alleys based on benefit, accord-
ing to the parking requirement for each unit. The police
. station would have 22 units and each dwelling about two
units. There would be no assessment for the sidewalk.
Ms. Jodie Drew, 15 Glen Street S., stated they had lived
at their present address for two years. The street was
in need of repair, but the alley paving was not brought
to her attention. The frontage would be assessed to her.
They do not use the alley, but they are being jeopardized
because they live next to the police station. She in-
quired how many other houses are next to paved alleys.
She inquired about the next step to object to the proj-
ect.
Mayor Ackland reported it was not the police department
asking to have the alley paved. The police didn't care
whether or not it was paved. A resident had requested it
be paved to reduce dust.
Ms. Kim Pearson, 146 Washington Avenue West, stated she
knew the city needed some improvement work done, but she
was not in favor of the assessment. Ms. Pearson asked
about the future of the property and why it was consid-
ered a commercial street.
The City Engineer assured that she would not be assessed
for commercial, if it was a residential property. The
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 0
oversizing for the commercial street would be deferred
until the use of the property became commercial in na-
ture.
Mr. Lowell Pearson, 146 Washington Avenue West, asked if
it would be a truck route. The answer was "no." The im-
provements will not change the designation of the street.
Mayor Ackland read a letter from the Hutchinson School
District in support of the project and a letter from
David M. Tewes, 127 First Avenue S.W., in opposition of
the project.
(b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 91 -02
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:35 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4186.
Engineer Rodeberg presented a report on the project.
Mr. Grant Olson, 1302 Delaware Street, stated his concern
was the cost of the assessment and the money to pay for
it since he was a student. He felt the project would be •
worthwhile in the long -run, but it was not financially
feasible for him right now.
The City Engineer stated there were four houses in the
area, and a mound system might work, but it probably
would not cost much less.
Mayor Ackland read a letter from Nghia and Cang Nguyen,
1318 Delaware, in favor of the project.
(c) LETTING NO. 5, PROJECTS NO. 91 -07, 91 -08, 91 -09
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:40 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4187.
PROJECT NO. 91 -07
Mr. Norman Hoefer, Green Castle, 250 Freemont Avenue,
Apt. 103, inquired how this project would affect their
building. He asked if there was something wrong with the
present curb and gutter. Mr. Hoefer stated that the big
trucks from the hospital project had added to the deteri-
oration of the street, and he didn't feel it was fair
that the residents were paying for the damage done by the
trucks. He wondered why there would be a shut -off in the
street. Mr. Hoefer also commented about an underground is
4
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
spring that was discovered during construction at the
hospital project site.
Engineer Rodeberg estimated the assessment to Green
Castle at $16,000. He reported project No. 91 -07 was a
state aid project. It was estimated that the State would
pick up $65,000 of the $185,000 cost. It was stated that
the majority of the project was to replace the street and
put in drain tile for drainage. The tile line would not
be assessed inasmuch as state aid would pay for it.
Mayor Ackland read a letter from the Hutchinson School
District in support of the project.
PROJECT NO. 91 -08
Mr. Norman Bowen, 218 Fifth Avenue N.E., asked why the
curb and gutter were being replaced. He stated that in
1971 he was assessed for water on the Fifth Avenue proj-
ect and wondered if it would make a difference that he
was assessed previously.
The Director of Engineering commented that it didn't make
• sense to only patch a street now, and then rip it up to
construct watermain in a year or two. Therefore, the
City was proposing to run a water main through the area
and then repair the street. Residents would get a credit
for street patching costs in last year's sanitary sewer
assessment.
The property owner on the corner lot of Bluff Street and
Fifth Avenue commented he had slips from previous assess-
ments. When his driveway was redone, the contractor put
in a 2' taper instead of the existing 6' taper.
Mayor Ackland stated that corner lots would only be
assessed for one side, as noted in the City assessment
policy.
PROJECT NO, 91 -09
Engineer Rodeberg reported that no assessments were pro-
posed for this project since it was a sidewalk replace-
ment.
(d) LETTING NO. 6, PROJECTS NO. 91 -10 6 91 -12
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read Publi-
cation No. 4188.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
PROJECT NO. 91 -10
Mr. Richard Schmidtbauer, Rt. 2, Hutchinson, (Schmidt -
bauer's Fourth Addition) asked if he had to pay for the
appurtenances. Also, he wondered if the driveways would
be put in.
PROJECT NO. 91 -12
No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -12.
(e) LETTING NO. 7, PROJECTS NO. 91 -13 6 91 -14
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read Publi-
cation No. 4189.
PROJECT NO. 91 -13
No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -13.
PROJECT NO. 91 -14
No one was present to be heard on Project No. 91 -14. .
Mayor Ackland read a letter from Dick Hennen, Hennen Fur-
niture, stating opposition to Projects 91 -13 and 91 -14.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to close the hearings
at 9:12 P.M.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar to approve and
order preparation of plans and specifications for all
projects, except for the alley portion of Project No.
91 -01, and to waive readings and adopt Resolutions No.
9400 - No. 9404. Motion seconded by Alderman Lenz and
unanimously carried.
C
COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) UPDATE ON LUCE LINE TRAIL
Director Dolf Moon commented on the Luce Line Trail and
signage, as well as a letter received from the insurance
carrier. He stated the issue was an area of private
property being used for a trail connection from the west
end of the trail in Kimberly Park to the east end of the
trail at the bass pond. •
6
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
Representatives of the Crow River Sno Pros snowmobile
club stated the club would put the trail through and pro-
vide signage at no cost to the City if the State would
agree to groom and maintain it. Also, the club offered
to assume trail liability under a special recreational
coverage recently obtained.
Following discussion with the DNR representative regard-
ing the liability for insurance and unfinished trail, the
City Attorney was directed to research the matter and
prepare a recommendation for the January 22 meeting.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM LLOYD ALLEN REGARDING ACQUISITION
CONTRACT FOR SHOPKO PROJECT
Attorney Anderson stated there was a dispute between the
City and Allen regarding his tenant who moved from an
existing building to another one of Allen's properties.
The contract stated Allen would be paid rent of $550 a
month for five months; however, the City, present prop-
erty owner, was not notified of the vacancy. Allen was
now requesting rental payment and $325 for attorney fees.
Following discussion and upon recommendation of the City
Attorney, Alderman Mlinar moved to approve payment of
rent per the contract and $325 attorney fees. Motion
seconded by Alderman Lenz and carried three to one, with
Mayor Ackland voting nay.
Attorney Anderson reported that Twin City Testing had
completed its study of the Shopko site, and it would be
recommending to the MPCA no further clean -up of the tri-
angular site or Mike's Mobil site, except for 400 cubic
yards of minimal clean -up problem. The MPCA might want
to put a tube into the ground and bring up the fumes
rather than remove the soil. The buildings should start
coming down in late winter or spring 1991.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 9388 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $137,500
FROM HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 9389 - DESIGNATING OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 9390 - APPOINTING LEGAL COUNSEL
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 9391 - APPOINTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR FOR
• 1991
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991 0
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 9392 - ENTERING AGREEMENT WITH PIONEERLAND
LIBRARY SYSTEM FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1991
(f) RESOLUTION NO. 9393 - DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORIES OF CITY
FUNDS IN COMMERCIAL BANKS AND INSTITUTIONS
(g) RESOLUTION NO. 9394 - DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITORY OF CITY
FUNDS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
(h) RESOLUTION NO. 9395 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES
FOR COLLATERAL FROM FIRST STATE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
ASSOCIATION OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
(1) RESOLUTION NO. 9396 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR
COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
(j) RESOLUTION NO. 9397 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR
COLLATERAL FROM MARQUETTE BANKS OF HUTCHINSON AS
SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
(k) RESOLUTION NO. 9398 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
(1) RESOLUTION NO. 9405 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES
FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
(m) RESOLUTION NO. 9406 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES
FOR COLLATERAL FROM CITIZENS BANK AND TRUST CO. OF
HUTCHINSON AS SPONSORING AGENCY OF THE HUTCHINSON
UTILITIES COMMISSION
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive readings and
adopt Resolutions No. 9388 - No. 9398 and No. 9405 and
No. 9406.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDING SMALL CITIES GRANT PROGRAM
Ms. Connie Mangan, Small Cities Project Coordinator, re-
ported on the three components of the grant. It was rec-
ommended to move the Hutch Hotel funding to housing reha-
bilitation.
11
8
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
Mr. Lowell Wakefield, owner of the Hutch Hotel building,
requested the Council to defer this item to allow him
time to develop the project. His proposal was to put
eight or nine units on third floor, offices on second
floor and retail on first floor. Nothing would be in the
basement.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Lenz, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried, to table until next meeting.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LAGS AND LIMBS PURCHASE
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to award bid to
highest bidder, Hutchinson Iron & Metal for $560.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING PURCHASE OF FLASH GRAVITY
STEAM STERILIZER FOR HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the
purchase.
• (d) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH MCLEOD
COUNTY
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve and
enter into agreement.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF HUTCHINSON AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously
carried, to approve and set up Task Force.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF THREE -MONTH FREEZE FOR GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Finance Director Merrill reported how the State's short-
fall of revenues would affect the cities. It was his
recommendation to put a three -month freeze on the general
fund, motor pool and water /sewer funds for all capital
expenditures, except for the CAD system previously ap-
proved by the Council. At the end of this period, staff
would review the plan with the Council and take appropri-
ate action.
•
0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY S, 1991 0
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Erickson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve the recommendation from the Finance
Director for a three -month freeze.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 POSITION CLASSIFICATION /PAY PLAN
Administrator Plotz commented on the plan and stated it
had the same merit system language as prior years, spe-
cifically, eligibility on an employee's anniversary date
of employment. Mr. Plotz reported he had completed a re-
view of one of the directors and would be making an ad-
justment within the criteria (% range) as the previous
year, unless otherwise directed at this time. The range
has been 0 -4% for those under mid -point and 0 -28 for
those above mid- point, with a not to exceed 1.25% average
for those employees over mid- point.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and
waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9399.
(h) SELECTION OF COUNCIL'S VICE- PRESIDENT - JOHN MLINAR •
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to elect John
Mlinar Vice - President.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY M & P PARTNERS,
ACOMA TOWNSHIP (TWO MILE RADIUS) WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Erickson to refer to County with contingencies. Motion
seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK
(TWO MILE RADIUS) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Erickson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to refer to County with no objection.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz reminded the Council of the joint
10
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 8, 1991
meeting on January 14 with County officials.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM TOM CARRIGAN
Engineer Rodeberg reported on a conflict between the City
and Tom Carrigan regarding a field stone retaining wall
erected by Mr. Carrigan on his property at 105 Paul's
Road and Hilltop Drive.
Mr. Carrigan stated he had to rent a bobcat to put the
stones in place. Therefore, he was submitting the bill
for $517.28 to the City for reimbursement.
Engineer Rodeberg noted his letter to Mr. Carrigan dated
October 12, 1990 and replied that the City clearly went
out of its way to help him, but his response had been
very uncooperative. The City agreement was to provide
material only, not for the labor. Mr. Rodeberg also
noted the wall was built on City property despite assur-
ances it would be on his own property.
City Attorney Anderson stated that Mr. Carrigan would be
principally liable for the wall, and the City would have
• some exposure of liability in the event of an injury
since the wall was partially on City boulevard.
Following discussion, Alderman Erickson moved to split
the cost of the bill. Motion seconded by Mayor Ackland
and failed on a split vote of two ayes and two nays.
Mr. Carrigan stated he would not accept half the cost.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN CRAIG LENZ
Alderman Lenz suggested contacting MN /DOT regarding the
intersection of Hwy. 7/15/22.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar commented on the memo regarding passenger
usage of the Hutchmobile service on New Year's Eve. It
was the consensus of the Council that the availability of
this service should continue.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg requested approval for change orders on
city projects No. 90 -11 and No. 90 -08. The motion was
made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and
11
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
- JANUARY
8, 1991
unanimously
carried,
to approve.
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR PAUL L. ACKLAND
Mayor Ackland commented that in September the City con-
tractor for tree removal dropped a limb onto adjoining
property and damaged a garage roof. The damage amounted
to $540.
Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to pay the
$540 damage to property owner and turn bill over to con-
tractor for reimbursement. Motion seconded by Alderman
Lenz and unanimously carried.
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the claims
and authorize payment from appropriate funds.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at •
11:00 P.M.
is
12
0
MINUTES
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 12:00 Noon by City Administrator
Gary D. Plotz. Also present was Administrative Secretary Marilyn
Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 4180, Proposal From A Development/
Owner, "Phase II" Shopko Project, was dispensed with. The follow-
ing proposals were received:
Super Valu Stores, Inc.
Minneapolis Division
Erickson's Diversified Corporation
Hudson, Wisconsin
The Everest Group, Ltd.
Roseville, Minnesota
•
0
The proposals were referred to staff for review.
The meeting adjourned at 12:05 P.M.
�S
MINUTES
BID OPENING
THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by Finance Director
Kenneth B. Merrill. Also present was Supervisor Doug Meier.
The reading of Publication No. 4190, Notice Of Advertisement For
Proposals On Car Impounding Contract, was dispensed with. The fol-
lowing proposal was received:
Lowell Baumetz
Modern Mazda
Hutchinson, MN
The proposal was referred to staff for review.
The meeting adjourned at 2:05 P.M.
•
N
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLA1411ING COMMISSION
Tuesday, December 1E, 1990
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint
Gruett, Dean Hood, E1Rov Cobratz, Craig Lenz and Chairman Bill
Craig. Ifembers absent: Tom Lyke. Also Present: Bu ilding Official
Jim Marka and Building Inspector ;lark Hensen
2. MINUTES
Mr. Flood made a notion to approve the minutes with corrections
on page 2 of the regular meetinq dated Tuesday, November 20, 1990.
Seconded by 1 1r. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM R -2 TO C -4
REQUESTED ON THE WALMAPT PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL
OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT
The public hearing for the request is to be continued
is to the February meeting.
(b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL
PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION
The public hearing for the request is to be continued to
the February meeting.
4. NEW EUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED EY M &P PARTNERS
ACOMA TOWNSHIP (2 RILE RADIUS)
Building Official Harka commented on staff
recommendations being the same as 6 months ago. There
was discussion on research of the topography of the area.
Mr. Ebent made a motion to recommend approval of the
sketch plan contingent on satisfactorily meeting city
staff and county requirements. Seconded by fir. Gruett
the motion carried unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION OF SHCPY.O SITE PLAN
• Building Official Marka updated the commission on
progress of the project stating the site plan is very
1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING CO1111ISSION MINUTES
12/18/90
preliminary. He explained that Shopko will present the
completed plan to the city when ready.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK
HASSAN VALLEY (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend - approval with no
objection, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried
unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT ON 5TH AVE REQUESTED BY BOB
SANSTEAD
Withdrawn.
(e) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTED BY ROBERT
HANTGE
Building Official Harka commented on the request of
constructing a Twin Home. He stated the transition would
fit in with the present Townhouses in the Miller PUD.
It was the consensus of the commission to recommend a
public hearing on the proposal.
5. OLD BUSINESS
(a) CONTINUING DISCUSSION REGARDING LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY
Chairman Craig proposed continuation until after a
meeting including all parties involved on Friday,
December 28, 1990, in the city offices at 1:30 P.M.
(b) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE - PROCEDURE
There was discussion of changes and hoar to address them.
Building Official Marka suggested all commissioners bring
their questions and concerns to him and he will compile
them. After that the commission could meet with Mr.
Weber for questions and discussion. Mr. Marka will
present an update of comments at the January meeting.
(c) COb111UNICATION FR014 STAFF
Building Inspector )Sark Hensen commented on his letter
and responses by affected property owners on the Hwy 7
readdressing proposal. He stated there would be
approximately 50 address changes. Discussion followed on
the original addressing. Mr. Wood stated from the post
office standpoint he would recommend the change. It was
the consensus of the dommission for Mr. Marka and Mr.
Hensen to talk to City Attorney Barry Anderson concerning
Ll
0
•
HUTCHINSON PLANNING C01414ISSION MINUTES
12/18/90
• the legality of the changes with or without platting.
6. OTHER BUSINESS
(a) PROPOSAL BY BOB ELLIOTT
Building Official Marka commented on a proposal by Mr.
Elliott, Town and Country Tire, to remodel the Meade
building on Washington Ave. for his business.
Mr. Elliott then presented a sketch plan of the proposal
requested and the parking, remodeling and reconstruction
of the building. Discussion followed on the loading
dock. Mr. Marka stated he is concerned about
encroachment into the right of way. It•was the consensus
of the planning commission to work with staff and return
for a public hearing.
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
8:45 p.m.
0
0 3
SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES
Is November 28, 1990
Members Present: Mildred Jensen, Reub Holman, Lloyd Mueller, Marie Kaping
Ex- Officio: Arnold Rotzien
Staff Present: Barb Haugen
O ld Business
The Holiday Bake Sale was discussed: board members will call participants from
mailing sheets to increase participation with the project. The CashWise hotdog
sales will come up in April - at that time staff will contact the store to enlist
the project.
The Crow River Days Project went well; nearly 20 seniors were recruited to volunteer
for this project.
It was reported that the families of Lulu Hagen and Gerry Scieszka donated $100.00
and $50.00 respectively to the Senior Building Fund.
ilew Business
The 1991 contract between the city and the nutrition program has been approved with
• an addition regarding lessee responsibility in th- daily cleaning of kitchen. Copies
of the agreement are available at the Center office.
The Board unanimously agreed upon an amount of $2000.00 to be deposited into the
Building Fund Account.
It was reported that the terms of Verna Hintz and Lloyd Piueller will expire at the
end of the year. Mr. Mueller has agreed to stay on for another term; Mrs. Hintz
will he retiring from the Board.
Staff will be preparing an annual report of accomplishments, goals & objectives which
will be reviewed at a future board meeting.
It was reported that staff RuLy Hanner will be on vacation until January 2, and that
staff Barb Haugen will request a maternity leave beginning in Mid -14ay. A work -
study student has been hired to serve as building supervisor during evening rentals
Staff reported on upcoming tours and activities to be sponsored by the Center during
the upcoming months.
Meeting adjourned at 10:40 am.
0
�Z 7�1 (s)
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
MEETING
. January 14, 1991
Meeting was called to order at 7 :30 n.m. by Dave Skaar.
Members present: Jim Faber, Joe Dooley, Dave Skaar, Doug Meier and Mark Lopac
Members absent: Mayor Paul Ackland, Dennis Kahl
Motion made by Joe Dooley and seconded by Mark Lopac, to approve minutes of
last meeting. Passed unanimously.
It was decided to contact the following people regarding the use of their
gas keys:
Joe Canine - return key
Al Johnson - return key
Mike Shea - return key
Walt Griepentrog - return key
Ward Martens - inquire intentions
Jerry Wright - inquire intentions
Next meeting to be held February 25th, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of City Hall.
Meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
1* Report submitted by Doug Meier
0
-1 1 - A (Y-)
0 HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
REGULAR BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING - December 18, 1990
Large Conference Room - 5:15 p.m.
Present: Dori Johnson, President Rich Myers, Vice President; Diane Gilmer,
Secretary; Keith Weber, Trustee; Rev. Thor Skeie, Trustee; Marlin
Torgerson, Trustee
Absent: Dr. Dean Nissen, Chief of Staff
Others Present: Philip G. Graves, Administrator; Frank Seivert, Director of
Finance; Jane Lien, Director of Nursing Services; Robyn Erickson,
Director of Education and Marketing; Jan Conner, Medical Staff/
Risk Management Coordinator; Pat Halverson, Director of Mental
Health Services; Gib Lehman, Director of Plant Operations; Robin
Schoen, Hutchinson Leader; Dave Clutter, KDUZ Radio; Laurie
Hulkonen, Recording Secretary
Prior to the meeting, Erickson presented a review of results from their
board self - evaluation surveys.
The meeting was called to order by President Johnson at 5:50 p.m.
Minutes of Past Meetings The minutes of the November 20, 1990, regular
meeting and the December 6, 1990, special meeting of the board of directors
were presented. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Weber, to approve the minutes of
the November 20, 1990, regular meeting and the December 6, 1990,
special meeting of the board of directors as presented. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
Medical Staff Meeting Minutes The minutes were presented and questions
answered by Conner. No unusual comments were made.
Old Business
A. Trustee Evaluation Discussion of the trustee evaluation took place
prior to the start of the regular meeting, as noted above.
B. Project Update Peter Worthington presented the construction
management report for the month. He noted that all framing was
expected to be done by the end of December and sheetrocking finished by
the end of January. Eighty percent of the ductwork was in place, and
the mechanical /electrical rough -in was well along. The building was
fully enclosed, except for the construction access, and temporary heat
was on. Within the next couple of weeks the serpentine wall will be
enclosed.
The project cost issue activity report was reviewed. New issues not
anticipated were discussed, including site concrete at the helipad and
Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Two
(B.) revising sprinkler mains at the hospital addition to allow for future
expansion. Also discussed was the cost of adding a cooling air handler
unit for the kitchen.
The cost status report was presented. Worthington noted cost issues,
stating the project remained well under budget. Over $200,000 had been
saved according to the original contract reports.
Question was asked on phase protection following a recent power outage
at the hospital. Worthington responded that the hospital's service was
being changed as part of the project, but phase protection was not
included. Lehman stated that Gary Nations, Harty Elving's electrical
engineer, was working on options for this. Elving was expected to
visit the site on December 19 to review this, and options will be
discussed. Lehman stated his preference for phase protection to be
included as part of the project.
The construction progress report was then reviewed, and projected
completion dates were discussed. A plan was being developed to find a
temporary home for Physical Therapy so the same -day surgery area
construction can begin earlier than expected.
Johnson thanked him for his optimistic report, and,Worthington and
Lehman left the meeting at this time.
C. Capital Expenditures The 1991 capital expenditure budget was
presented and reviewed. Graves noted that the budget started out at
$1,000,000, and he commended the efforts of department directors who
reviewed and cut the proposed expenditures down to the requested
$387,165.00. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Gilmer, to approve the
capital expenditure budget for 1991 as presented. All were in
favor. Motion carried.
A. Reappointment of Consulting Medical Staff Reapplications for
consulting medical staff privileges were presented and reviewed.
Recommendation was received from the Executive Committee of the medical
staff for approval. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Torgerson, to reappoint the
following practitioners to the consulting medical staff:
11
Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Three
(A.) No Changes in Privileges
John Bowar, M.D.
Kent Carlson, M.D.
Robert Heeter, N.D.
J. Milo Meland, M.D.
R. Daniel Nelson, M.D.
Robert Pollock, M.D.
Robert Van Tassel, M.D.
Additional Privileges
Stefan Laxdal, M.D.
Dhanush Prasad, M.D.
John Stock, M.D.
Michael Bromer, M.D.
Mark Friedland, N.D.
Martin Lipschultz, M.D.
David Larson, M.D.
James Presthus, M.D.
John Uecker, M.O.
Robert Nordland, M.D.
Paul Sanderson, M.D.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
Appointments to the Medical Staff Recommendation was received from
the Executive Committee of the medical staff and applications were
reviewed for medical staff appointments. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Myers, seconded by Weber, to appoint the
following practitioners to the Medical Staff:
Borislav Velkov, M.O., active staff privileges in surgery
with specific privileges in obstetrics and gynecology;
Nancy Ortlip, LPN, allied health staff privileges as a
physician's assistant; and
Richard Cervenka, DPM, courtesy podiatric staff privileges
pending clarification of health status.
All were in favor. Motion carried.
C. Bylaws Change A change to the board bylaws was presented which
specifies that hospital employees are trained to treat the age groups
that person works with. The change is being made in accordance with
JCAHO standards. The personnel director will police the job
descriptions to specify age groups treated, and the QA committee will
act as an umbrella to ensure all are monitored.
Following discussion:
Notion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Myers, to approve the
bylaws change as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried.
0
3.
Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Four
D. McLeod and Meeker Day Treatment Program Halverson presented
information about a new day treatment program for children and a
proposed agreement for provision of this service. The idea for the
program came from recent children's mental health legislation. She
told the board that children used to be evaluated locally and then be
placed outside the home for the treatment period, but it was determined
that reintegration for these children becomes very difficult. The
modern day movement is to keep children in less restricted treatment
settings, and counties now have specific requirements to have a
children's day treatment program available to them by July, 1991.
Anticipating this, a group of agencies came together to write a grant
(one of just ten available through the State) to fund hiring a person
to become a link between the school, caregivers and families. The team
includes an educator, teacher, behavioral therapist and case manager.
The program started with three clients but has grown to seven. A full -
time mental health therapist is officed at the site, and clinical
supervision is provided by Doctor Bob Beal. Halverson is involved in
screening the program to ensure the people served are the people
designed to be served. The board agreed that this program serves a
valuable need in the community and thanked Halverson for her report.
Prior to taking action on this report, the board next heard the
quarterly C.D. program report.
E. Ouarterly Chemical Dependency Program Report Halverson also presented
an overview of the status of the hospital's C.O. program. She reported
a rise in program growth since January of 1990. Program days have
grown since September, when a competitor's office closed. The number
of clients averaged 2.0 in January, 1990, and had grown to 12.4 in
November. Forty percent of the program funding comes from Rule 25
state programs, and the remaining 60% comes from Medicare and private
payors.
The aftercare program had continued to grow, as well, averaging 20 -25
clients, including family members. On December 1, the program was
split to allow for growth in that area, as well. After care has seen
90% of its clients through the first six months, which Halverson stated
was a good percentage.
She noted a staff change that took place when Ms. Joan Webster, the
primary care therapist, left to return to Abbott Northwestern's program
and Mr. Marty Sherman replaced her, noting he brought a lot of skills
and is doing a good job.
The program's objectives were reviewed, citing that staff continues to
feel children between the ages of 5 and 12 years of age need to be
reached. School outreach - develop relapse prevention program, and
referral network from schools.
tl ,
• Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Five
(E.) Following discussion:
Motion was made by Gilmer, seconded by Myers, to approve the
agreement for children's day treatment services and approve the
quarterly c.d. program report as presented. All were in favor.
Motion carried.
F. Medical Director The board learned that Dr. Bill Petersen, vice
president of medical affairs at Abbott Northwestern Hospital, agreed to
serve as medical director at no charge (other than routine fees already
paid LifeSpan). Credentialing will be forthcoming within the next
month or so.
G. Mental Health Planning The board was informed that an agreement has
been entered into with Michael Groh to assist in determining future
directions for the hospital's mental health services. No unusual
comments were made.
H. CEO Evaluation President Johnson appointed Skeie and Weber to assist
herself and Gordon Sprenger of LifeSpan in evaluation of the CEO
performance for the past year. Sprenger will contact the board members
to arrange a meeting time to discuss the evaluation.
I. Other
1. Sterilizer A capital expenditure request for a flash gravity
steam sterilizer was presented for approval. This equipment was
budgeted for $20,000 as part of the building program. Only two
vendors manufacture this type of sterilizer; those vendors were
contacted, and their bids were received. After careful
examination of the bids, the surgery supervisor recommended
acceptance of the lower bid from Castle Corporation at a cost not
to exceed $22,146.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Torgerson,
recommend to the City Council
gravity steam sterilizer from
not to exceed $22,146. All w
0
seconded by Gilmer, to
the purchase of the flash
Castle Corporation at a cost
re in favor. Motion carried.
2. Holiday Construction Open House Erickson invited the board to
attend the employee open houses to be held on December 26 (for
Medical Center employees) and December 27 (for HCH employees).
3. Estes Park Conference Erickson distributed information on
upcoming Estes Park conferences for hospital trustees. Interested
trustees were asked to contact the hospital to register.
Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Six
4. Appreciation President Johnson requested a letter of
appreciation be forwarded from the board to the Dietary department
staff for their extra efforts during the past year, and mention
was made of the many special meetings during the year. The press
representatives at the meeting were also thanked for their
coverage of board meetings. Hospital staff in attendance were
also thanked for their contributions to the board meetings each
month.
S. LifeSpan Board Meeting Recap Myers informed the board that all
LifeSpan hospital revenue budgets were reviewed by the LifeSpan
board at their December meeting. All were submitted in the same
format and generally had the same issues to look at. The range of
price increases being requested was 7 -12%. All had significant
increases in percentage of benefits (15 -15%). Discounts were
generally an issue. Cambridge Hospital discussed a Medicare
adjustment from three years ago amounting to $300,000, which
resulted in a loss for them for the year. Minneapolis Children's
Hospital is undertaking a $35 million project, building up three
floors on site. The new CEO of Stevens County Memorial Hospital
in Morris gave an update on their hospital's direction.
Accounts Payable The accounts payable listing for November was presented.
Following discussion:
Motion was made by Skeie, seconded by Gilmer, to approve the attached
listing of accounts payable and cash disbursements for payment in the
amount of
Statistical Report and Financial Statements The statistical report for
November was next presented. Year -to -date admissions continued to be 5.8%
less than budget and slightly less than one year ago, and average daily
census continued to be about three patients less than a year ago, continuing
the trend from earlier in the year. Average length of stay was 4.2, down
from 4.5 one year ago. Average occupancy was 40%.
November admissions were slightly off from October, and occupancy was 39.1 %.
Utilization was down when compared to the previous month, but surgical
departments continued to reflect significant increases in volume and reached
a record number of cases for the month. Outpatient volumes continued to
increase, reflecting the trend toward outpatient care.
The financial statements were also presented. Year -to -date, gross patient
revenues were 512,667,000, or about 1.4% more than budget; however,
discounts were about $24,000 higher than budget, leaving a net operating
revenue of $10,570,000, or 1.5% more than budget. Operating margin was
$34,506 and, adding in the total other operating revenues left excess
revenues over expense for 11 months of $310,388.
0
Board of Directors Meeting - 12/18/90
Page Seven
Statistical Report and Financial Statements (continued)
November patient revenues were $1,257,000, or 4% more than budget. Net
operating revenue was just under $1,040,000, or 6.6% more than budget.
Discounts were less than budget. Operating expenses were $1,061,000, or
13.3% more than budget, principally in salaries, benefits, supplies and
other (including increased surgical supplies and MHU physician services)
expenses. The hospital had an operating loss of approximately $24,000 for
the month; however, when total other operating revenues of $34,000 were
added, excess revenues over expense for the month totalled $9,811.
Auxiliary Meeting Minutes Minutes of the October and November, 1990, HCH
Auxiliary meetings were presented. No unusual comments were made.
Adjournment Motion was made by Torgerson to adjourn the meeting. The
meeting was then adjourned at 7:OS p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Laurie Hulkonen Diane Gilmer
• Recording Secretary Secretary
LH
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
BURNS MANOR/HCH TASK FORCE MEETING - December 4, 1990
Large Conference Room - 12:00 p.m.
Present: Jim Mills, Chairman; Dori Johnson; Kay Peterson; Rich Myers;
Marlin Torgerson; Don Erickson
Others Present: Robert Koepcke, Burns Manor Administrator; Philip G.
Graves, HCH Administrator; Patty McCullough and Brenda Fox, Health
Planning and Management Resources; Duane Nelson, Charles Bailly &
Company; Frank Seivert, HCH Director of Finance; Robin Schoen,
Hutchinson Leader; Dave Clutter, KDUZ; Laurie Hulkonen, Recording
Secretary
The purpose of the meeting was to hear the presentation of the planning
consultants regarding the feasibility of the proposed merger of the Burns
Manor Nursing Home and Hutchinson Community Hospital.
Patty McCullough introduced herself to the group and distributed the
analysis of issues regarding the close working relationship between Burns
Manor and HCH. The report highlights included the following:
o Definition of market area;
o Services available to seniors to the market area;
a Trends in delivery of services to the elderly;
o Congregate housing, assisted living and nursing home demand for
the market area;
o Perceived advantages and disadvantages in a relationships between
HCH and Burns Manor; and
o Conclusions and recommendations regarding an optimal service
delivery system for the elderly in the Hutchinson market area.
A map of the perceived market area was discussed. McCullough noted that the
market area for a hospital can be very different from that of a nursing
home, depending on the needs of the elderly in the area.
The analysis of the socio- demographic was done by segmenting senior
population by five -year increments with the exception of the 65 -69 market,
and is a growth in all other segments of the senior market in the four zip
code area studied. They looked at what types of services were available,
primarily in the city of Hutchinson. Comment was made that, historically,
Hutchinson attempts to coordinate services rather than spearheading new
initiatives. McCullough's survey showed that 32% of hospital admissions are
65 years and older, and 47.5% of hospital patient days were for that age
group. They also inventoried all nursing homes surrounding the market area
for 1989 occupancy.
Future trends were discussed, showing several major areas to emphasize for
planning. Increased awareness and increased economic power of the senior
population, increased service alternatives to the home, increased housing
alternatives, decreased nursing home utilization will all need to be
• addressed. The rise in disposable income of the elderly, using 1985
dollar&. was discussed.
4-A (G ? (gip
Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting - 12/4/91
Page Two
The projected need for nursing beds, assuming current population trends and
no change in policy or service delivery, was discussed. A government study
done by a government agency showed that the state pays 50% of nursing home
bills (medical assistance dollars in MN). With the projected state budget
shortfall, the assumption was made that only 143 beds will be needed in the
year 2010.
Also included in the report was a projected analysis of housing needs,
assisted living demands and nursing home demands. McCullough predicted the
nursing home market will become as competitive as the hospital business is
now, because families now ask more questions, do more shopping for nursing
home care, and will continue to do so.
McCullough told the group they would discuss the perceived advantages and
disadvantages at the next meeting. Because the two organizations don't have
a long history of working together, there would be a lot of unknowns in
this.
Conclusions and recommendations were discussed. McCullough told the group
she saw compelling reasons for integration and merger that will benefit the
older person in the market area. Long term, the customer will benefit from
some kind of merger or integration. Other business reasons for an
integration include:
o An integrated continuum of care for health and related services;
allowing patients to enter healthcare system at one point. It was
noted that a free - standing nursing home is going to have a tough
time because of the financial resources needed to provide optimum
services within the long term care system.
o The ability to increase services and maximize reimbursement,
specifically in the areas of marketing, personnel and education,
without having to create a whole new department.
o The ability to increase overall quality of care of older persons
using the system.
o The need for organizational strength to make major capital
investments -- McCullough recommended one campus for both units to
allow more involvement of physicians, to allow moving of persons
to less intensive levels of care as soon as possible, and to
better utilize staff. She recommended that the Burns Manor site
be transitioned to an assisted living facility or combination
model with both lower level case mix and assisted living in the
same building.
She then fielded questions from the task force. Myers requested addition of
an issue to define the strategic intent on the part of the City as to what
services they want to provide to residents. A recommendation to the City
Council from the task force and both boards is needed, Torgerson stated, to
suggest a long -term strategic intent to provide services to all income
levels and all levels of need.
I.
. Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting - 12/4/91
Page Three
A possible timeline was discussed. The key to finalizing the decision will
be the financial analysis, which will be presented at the next meeting. By
the end of January, an action plan and resources needed to have it happen
may be identified.
Graves questioned what would happen if Bailly finishes the financial
analysis and finds no financial incentive. When asked if there are enough
reasons to consider a consolidation regardless, McCullough answered yes,
stating the process may be altered, but the long term benefit would be
there. Myers agreed, but stated the market share of the future will change.
Government is getting out of health care, and persons today are asking
better questions, having perceived ideas of what they want and planning for
what they will get.
Nelson indicated that enough of his studies thus far indicate favorable
financial figures. He felt the task force must look at more of an overall
position because reimbursement might change, but his study will consider
present regulations. He estimated the financial incentive could easily add
up to $200,000 or better.
An emphasis will be placed on attracting and retaining adequate staffing.
Merging would be an advantage because of need to push nursing home wages up
• in order to attract people. The nursing home would be at a real
disadvantage without this.
Johnson stated she has received many offers for older care nursing home
insurance mail and sees a tremendous potential there. She suggested using
the Hospital auxiliary as a tool to help reach and educate people in the
community about the integration effort. McCullough responded that many
congregate housing models have required renters to carry nursing home
insurance. She stated she sees a lot of opportunity for Hutchinson to
create a model service delivery system, where an assisted living facility
could lease old nursing home space from the hospital.
The next steps were summarized, with the administrators meeting to
coordinate assumptions. The next two meetings will be set for January. The
task force will want to be in a position to make decisions in January and
make a recommendation to the City Council by the fourth Tuesday in January.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Laurie Hulkonen
Recording Secretary
• LH
fn
41.1 .
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
BURNS MANOR /HCH TASK FORCE MEETING - January 8, 1991
Multi- Purpose Room at Burns Manor - 12:00 Noon
Present: Jim Mills, Chairman; Don Erickson, Kay Peterson and Dori Johnson
Absent: Rich Myers and Marlin Torgerson
Others Present: Phil Graves, HCH Administrator; Robert Koepcke, Burns
Manor Administrator; Frank Seivert, HCH Director of Finance; Pat
McCullough, Health Planning 6 Management Resources; Duane Nelson,
Charles Bailly and Company; Robin Shoen, Hutchinson Leader; Dave
Clutter, KDU2 /KKJR Radio; La Mae Maiers, Recording Secretary
Members of the Burns Manor /HCH Task Force met to hear the results of the
financial study recently completed by Duane Nelson, accountant from
Charles Bailly 3 Company. The study was completed to determine the
financial (impact) feasibility of a possible merger between Burns Manor
and Hutchinson Community Hospital.
Copies of the report completed by Charles Bailly 8 Company were
distributed and reviewed. The results of the report appeared optimistic,
favoring a C&NC arrangement. In preparing the reports Nelson stated he
• had taken a conservative approach, and equalized benefit costs so as not
to be discriminatory between the organizations. His report included a
commentary and schedules presenting pro forma cost report
adjustments /assumptions for the nursing home along with a Medicare type
format relating to the Rule 50 stepdown. He also presented projected
rates and pro forma projection for rate year beginning July 1, 1991.
Nelson explained the effect of sharing services, allocating costs based on
the Medicare stepdown cost report and the impact of adjusting salaries and
benefits at the nursing home, to bring them more in line with the rates
paid at the hospital for comparable positions. By increasing salaries and
benefits at the nursing home, it is anticipated that the high turnover
rate would be reduced and training costs decreased.
Nelson explained further that in order to allocate costs between the two
organizations on the Medicare Costs Report, services would have to be
shared between the two facilities. Specific mention was made in the areas
of dietary services and nursing services - -one dietitian and one nursing
administrator. Operating costs would not necessarily be reduced, but
would allow a more efficient use of the services, allowing higher costs at
the hospital to be allocated to the nursing home, and the home would have
the advantage of receiving services not presently available to it (e.g.
staff dietitian). Services would also be shared in administration
accounting, communications systems and laundry.
Burns Manor /HCH Task Force Meeting
January 8, 1991
Page Two
The current rate per day for residents at the nursing home was also
addressed. Burns Manor's rate is lower than other nursing homes in the
area and a rate increase is anticipated. Koepcke noted that the merger
would give Burns Manor more support and resources to allow "continual
operation" and the community and residents would be receiving a better
product for their money.
Overall, the reports indicated additional revenue could be realized from
CSNC allocation and operational changes of approximately $612,000.
Allowing for adjustments in the area of salaries and benefits,
unemployment, workers compensation rate, and other areas, a (conservative)
net change in cash flows is projected at approximately 5330,000.
Long term goals were briefly addressed - -the possibility of a skilled bed
facility at the hospital site and converting some present nursing home
beds into an "assisted living" facility. It was noted that doctors are
more willing to discharge patients earlier when a skilled nursing facility
(SNF) is adjacent to the hospital. A SNF near the hospital also allows
the physicians easier access and closer monitoring of their patients. A
shorter stay in the hospital by Medicare patients would al 'so improve
Medicare reimbursement to the hospital. At this point Burns Manor is not
able to handle acute patients and, therefore, they stay in the hospital •
longer and additional money is lost due to reimbursement.
The financial report was based on receiving CSNC status July 1, 1991.
Nelson and McCullough both stated timing could be of the essence.
Although they do not anticipate any changes in the current requirements
for CSNC status, it could be legislatively changed after July 1. Nelson
and McCullough both offered assistance in obtaining CSNC status by that
date.
The task force members expressed optimism at the possibility of the merger
taking place. Peterson requested more time to review materials before she
voiced her recommendation. Following further discussion, a consensus was
reached as follows:
That Burns Manor and Hutchinson Community Hospital proceed with plans
to merge the two organizations by July 1, 1991, under the following
conditions and terms:
- Further financial analysis confirms the preliminary estimates
completed by Charles Bailly and Company;
- Burns Manor completes a five -year projected cash flow
analysis;
- The two organizations' board of directors can finance the
cash requirements necessary to effect the merger or present a
plan to the city council that is acceptable to them for
assisting with up -front cash requirement; •
s - L .
• Burns Manor/Task Force Meeting
January 8, 1991
Page Three
- That the merger will not adversely affect the sale of bonds
to finance the remaining portion of the hospital construction
project; and
- Regulatory approval will be requested and granted.
Discussion then ensued as to what immediate decisions need to be made
should approval to proceed with plans to merge be granted by the city
council. The following were cited:
- Designation of a single governing authority; and
- Appointment of a chief executive officer.
In order to proceed beyond this point, the city council would have to
empower the task force to continue with recommendations for a board of
directors and a CEO, or a board of directors could be named and empowered
by the city council to proceed with plans for the merger.
A joint meeting between the Burns Manor Board of Directors, City Council,
and Hutchinson Community Hospital Board of Directors will take place on
Tuesday, January 15, at 4:30 p.m. in the Large Conference Room of the
Hospital. Pat McCullough and Duane Nelson will present a summary of their
• findings to the full boards and council and also be available to address
any questions. Jim Mills will be chairing the joint meeting.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
approximately 2:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
La Mae J. Maiers
Recording Secretary
LJM
0
�j.
R r. M 0' " E SNO ........... horebyappliesl _PLOW AND
P�d . ..... .....
upon that Metal, t of land d-crEbed as fallow L . ..... ...... . .... . . .- Bloek . .. . ....... ....... ..... ..
plat or addition , _ . 11 11 � - 1.. 1 1 ; address . ................ .
which is Of the following size an d arm; width feet; Imifth fat;
area WITIIIN TILE CITY LIMITS
. .......... -
and hereb gree, th i ease wh P ,,, nit is ranted,
eeli.11 whi hall i; used shalt � w ith thge that all walk whEch shall b d an d .11
p and therefor herewith submitt
and With all the crdia o f j id_ . MTY OF IlLrrCIIINsoN
applicable - ............ ................ - I . .. ............... ... ........... I ........ . ................. ... ...........
4 PPlicant further agrees to p,, f ees or asu .,,, ni , at i
follows: it's time and 14 the amounts 1pwtfld'w
$1.00
•
....................
Owner
MN
JLC-eL1CA1i0jj FOR_�N'111 . NLMOVAL JUUT
_p
To as CO UNCIL .... . ........
of th* . . ... ................... . ..... . _ . . ........ . . . .............. co.'ay 'f
— Mc LWO 1 .111 . . . . ......... .......... $tat# of MLnnasae,
The un�lerjljned owner whose addres 4..__
hereby applies for o. permit t PLOW AND
REMOVE SNOW W
............... I ..... . . ............. . .... ..... . ... .. -
upon that certain tract If land described " follows : L
Plat or addition
; address .. .. .............. . ..................
wh0a is of th following size and area width feet; length feet;
arm WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS
and h agrees that, in e-91 each permit 1, granted, that a ll wor ), which shall be done and all
materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and 'PtCifieatlmw therefor herewith submitted
and with all the orcitna o f s aid .. CITY OF HUTCH
applicable thereto.
If➢➢liMat further agrees to pay f ees a ,.
folloWl: at the liens and in the amounts s p ee lfla' as
$1.00
............... ............ ................. .................. . ......... . ..........
..................... . .....
...........
.. .........
1,6 NVP Owner
APPLICATION FORsNOw eEMOVnL ... _ PERMIT
To as
ofth cuy ... ..................... _ .. . .................
... ....... . . .. . .... ................... .... the County of
State of Minnesot
The undersigned owner whose address i ..... ... 1 ;4-
R r. M 0' " E SNO ........... horebyappliesl _PLOW AND
P�d . ..... .....
upon that Metal, t of land d-crEbed as fallow L . ..... ...... . .... . . .- Bloek . .. . ....... ....... ..... ..
plat or addition , _ . 11 11 � - 1.. 1 1 ; address . ................ .
which is Of the following size an d arm; width feet; Imifth fat;
area WITIIIN TILE CITY LIMITS
. .......... -
and hereb gree, th i ease wh P ,,, nit is ranted,
eeli.11 whi hall i; used shalt � w ith thge that all walk whEch shall b d an d .11
p and therefor herewith submitt
and With all the crdia o f j id_ . MTY OF IlLrrCIIINsoN
applicable - ............ ................ - I . .. ............... ... ........... I ........ . ................. ... ...........
4 PPlicant further agrees to p,, f ees or asu .,,, ni , at i
follows: it's time and 14 the amounts 1pwtfld'w
$1.00
•
....................
Owner
MN
POPCORN STAND
APPLICATION FOR ....................... PER1biIT
City Council
Cit ..................o ............ Huthi. liS_ QD..._..........................._....... ...................._........in the Coun o•
o, t,4,? _ .............._ _. ..........y......._......._..., f �J T
McLeod
..... I...... ....... . State of .Ifinneso!a:
iS\
The undcrsegned ouvter whose address ie 831 Second Ave Southwest
...._ ........... .. ..... . . . .. � .. jl.
`I .
Hutchinson MN 55350 _..,,... .. .. , ... .. hereby appZies for a permit tah
..... ... ..... ...
operate a Popcorn Stand at the southwest corner of the Public Square ;
.... . ... .... _.......... ............ . ...
u on fiat re�d tract of ianrl ds =cribcd as foliou•s: Lot- ___. . _._........ . _ ; Block
r.Irt nrrddici.;n .........._.. ... addre. ^s..._......_..... ......___.. ._._.__._ ;
U 7 u•v :> oT ;re Tcl:c, :ng si :e and area; uidth .__ _ eel; Ier.,'
c:r ..._ ...._.... ..... .I ... .. .... . .. . ..... ... .. _.. ........ . ....... .... _ ..... .....
......__....._..;
c•.1"; I,crti,:j c =rc,s that, in case such permit is franted, to all work uicich shall be done and all
materials u•ltieh shall be used shall comply with the plans and specifications therefor her<uith sulrm.ittcd
oral i.ith all the ordinances of said ....... ..._..........._........ '.t? _..........._...... .
.- ........._.............. - .. ........... ......... ......
, _disable thereto.
• lrpZicant further agrees to pay fees or assessments at the time and in the amounts specifed as
j o1lo:cs:
$50.00 Fee for One Year
...................................................................................................................................... ............................... .---................................ ...............................
x...... .
<,�
Hdrk MC Owner
4-ct'
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 10TH, 1991, AND ON
THURSDAY, JANUARY 17TH, 1991.
NOTICE OF HEARING
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 91 -03
Publication No. 4197
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.H. on the
22nd day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of the
Main Street Redevelopment Area from 2nd Avenue N. to 3rd Avenue S. by the
construction of Watermain Services and Appurtenances for the Downtown
Sprinkling Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to
429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the
benefitted property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $118,800.00, with an
estimated $118,800.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of
$237,6CO.Oo.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement
will be heard at this meeting.
Dated: January 4th, 1991 ItRI k.� -Q '�c�
City A45inistr or
PLEA:,E NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
40
,,-�—]1,
��
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
PUBLIC HEARING - Letting No. 3
Tuesday, January 22, 1991 - 8:00 p.m.
Downtown Sprinkling
Water Services And Appurtances for the Downtown Sprinkling Project
The project was proposed to bring water service to the 12 buildings
indicated below, which have been noted as requesting or requiring
sprinkling. A number of estimates have been produced for serving
these and other properties by several different options. This
estimate range is based on separate services for each non - adjoining
property, and a system running along the sidewalk.
The estimate is approximate only and could vary when in -depth
design and permitting review is undertaken.
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$144,000 - 237,600
Properties Proposed To Be Served
•
1.
23
Hain
Street
2.
8
Hain
Street
3.
7
Main
Street
4.
2
Main
Street
5.
14
Main
Street
6.
24
Hain
Street
7.
30
Hain
Street
8.
114
Hain
Street
9.
126
Main
Street
10.
130
Hain
Street
il.
133
Main
Street
12.
218,228,238 Main
Smith /Hennan Furniture)
The following is based on previous memos and letters and
discussions with staff. It is not proposed as is, and is subject to
review and revision.
Internal Sprinkling Estimate $155,000
Proposed to come from $238,000 HCDC Revolving Loan Fund
N
N
N
N
S
S
S
S
S
S (Carney's)
S (Hair Gallery)
Street S (Dick
Proposed Funding
(Aubony)
(Home Bakery)
(Ingleman Design)
(L. Meyer)
(Brinkman Studio)
(H &R Block)
(Aquaria Pets)
(Alrick's)
Downtown Sprinkling Estimate $144,000 - 237,600
$83,000 proposed to come from HCDC Revolving Loan Fund (Remainder
of above). The rest is proposed to come from City Sewer /Water Funds
($61,000 - 154,600)
Assessments (Internal Sprinkling Only)
Structures with no remodeling $ .50 /square foot
Structures with $5,000 - 10,000 of remodeling $ .15 /square foot
Structures with over $10,000 of remodeling $ .00 /square foot �,
' I
FIRST AVENUE
a,.....
i I
s.. a... am.,. i
. s ...
4' au..
SECOND AVENUE
z I z
Q � 2
LL I
i i • E I i....� —�I
- — 1
p p
w �d
w f�LI uj
N u
I
L�
SOUTH
•
P I "� I I —
AVL
..M ..
I.• r... ......... II
WASHINGTON
r �
J
I-
W
W
R
r
I N
NORTH
AVENUE
SOUTH
P I "� I I —
AVL
..M ..
I.• r... ......... II
WASHINGTON
r �
J
I-
W
W
R
r
I N
NORTH
AVENUE
SOUTH
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 10TH, 1991, AND ON
THURSDAY, JANUARY 17TH, 1991.
NOTICE OF HEARING
LETTING NO. 4
PROJECT NO. 91 -04, 91 -05, 91 -06
Publication No. 4198
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
will meet in the Hutchinson City Hall Council Chambers at 8:00 P.M. on the
22nd day of January, 1991, to consider the making of an improvement of :
PROJECT NO. 91 -04: Hassan Street from 5th Avenue S.E. to Oakland Avenue by
the Construction of Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
PROJECT NO. 91 -05: Ivy Lane from Oakland Avenue to 7th Avenue S.E. by the
Construction of Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Bituminous Base, Surfacing
and Appurtenances;
PROJECT NO. 91 -06: 6th Avenue S.E. from Hassan Street to Jefferson Street by
the Construction of Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base,
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area
proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for
wi;ich property owners shall receive mailed notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $31 2 400.00, with an
estimated ;217,000.00 Assessable Cost, for the total estimated cost of
$248,400.00.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement
will be heard at this meeting.
Dated: January 4th, 1991
City Adm nistrat
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE
BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
40
•
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
PUBLIC HEARING - Letting No. 4
Tuesday, January 22, 1991 - 8:00 p.m.
Hassan Street Project 91 -04
Ivy Street Project 91 -05
6th Avenue SE Project 91 -06
Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base,
Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base and Surfacing, and Appurtances
Estimated Project Cost
11
Hassan Street $192,000
Ivy Street $ 30,000
6th Avenue SE $ 26,400
TOTAL $248,400
Estimated Apportionment
Total Estimated Project Cost
$248,400
City Share $ 31,400
(Sideyard benefit, Sidewalk, Sanitary Sewer, etc)
Estimated Assessable Share
$217,000
Typical Estimated Assessment (66 ff Lot)
E
Residential Street Surfacing (66 ff @ $32 /ff) $2,100
Residential Curb and Gutter (66 ff @ $6.10 /ff) $ 400
Residential Driveway $ 600 - 1,200
Typical Estimated Assessment (66 ff lot) $2,100 - 3,700
RESOLUTION NO. 9408
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
4" Water Meter
—a—
$1,030
Resale
Water
Yes
Water Products Co.
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR
Date Approved: January 22, 1991
O otion made by:
Seconded by:
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
7 —A
0
RESOLUTION NO. 9409
RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FOR COLLATERAL
FROM FIRST BANK OF MINNESOTA OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the First Bank of Minnesota of Hutchinson, a City
depository, has presented as collateral $100,288.43 as follows:
DESCRIPTION
RATE
MATURITY
AMOUNT
Fed. Home Loan Bank
10.0
03 -25 -92
$100,288.43
0
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, that the Treasurer be authorized to accept said securi-
ties as collateral and that said collateral be deposited for safe-
keeping.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
7_1p.
FIRST
�- NATIONAL
BANK OF
:�
P0. Box 39
Glencoe, JIN 55336
612.564 -3161
15012 Hwx. 7
'xlinnctonka. ,AIN 55345
612.933 -9550
•
•
GLENCOE /MINNETONKA
January 16, 1991
Honorable Paul Ackland
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Paul,
I would like to thank you and the City Council for the extention of
time in which we have reviewed the Small Cities Development Program
Grant (SCDP). My accountant Mr. Benshop has met with Mr. Burnhagen
and Ms. Connie Mangan regarding the January 10, 1991, memorandum
from Mr. Gary Plotz setting forth the requirement from the city.
I have concluded that it is not fensible to enter into such an
agreament with the city to redevelope the hotel property due to
it's terms and requirements.
I would again like to thank you for the necessary extention of
time.
Very truly yours,
FIRST N. IONAL BANK
s�ua✓
Lowell G. Wake field
Chairman
LGW /sd
cc: Gary Plotz
City of Hutchinson
(612) 587 -5151
'CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
TO: Mayor and City Council q `
FROM: Connie ManganCl V \�� —\--
January 4, 1991
RE: BUDGET REVISION REQUEST TO SMALL CITIES DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Attached is the budget Revision Request for
The request adds additional administrative funds
rehabilitation project. Vickie Rephs, Dept. of
opment suggested an extension of the program for
would allow two building seasons for the housing
allow sufficient time to close out the program.
the Small Cities Program
and adds the housing
Crade and Economic Devel-
one year, to December 1992,
rehabilitation program and
As of December 31, 1990, 20 loans totaling $425,532.35 have been made:
Commercial: $389,823.35
SCDP
282,621.93
• HCDC
107,201.42
Apartment: $ 35,709
SCDP
25,889.03
HCDC
9,819.99
I am proposing moving $5,000 from apartment rehabilitation and
$30,000 from commercial rehabilitation for administration. This would
leave $92,901.07 of SCDP funds (72.5% of the loan amount) for commercial
loan, and $31,948 of SCDP funds (72.57 of the loan amount) for apartment_
rehabilitation.
I am also proposing to delete the Hutch Hotel project and to add a
housing rehabilitation program (see memo of 12/24/90). The Housing
Rehabilitation proposal will use $265,000 for housing rehabilitation
loans and $35,000 for administration of the housing rehabilitation program.
CM /bb
•
6 R AN 'I'NUMBER : SCDP - 00- 0002 -0 -FY 8
GRA E'F.:CITY OF H UTCHINSON
RIMSRIN I IIQIT: '1
1'Itt))li('TT'ITLI MATN9TRFnT T1PTOI -M PrIIAJ3 P
v
BUDGET SUMMARY
ADIUSTMI ?NT'
REQUESTED REVISED
CI IAN(ili APPROVYD/
M ,
BY AC IVITY
CURRENT BUDGET
RF"QUESThD
ISUDGBT
DISAPPROVED
y
Artivitt"
SCDP OT IIIAl TOT
SCDP 0 "T IIER TOTAL
SC DP OTHFR TOTAL
9a Apartment rehab
72657 53704 126361
(5000) 18616 13616
67657 72320 139977
m
y j
LMI
O
O
9a Apartment rehab
12000 -- 12000
5000 -- 5000
17000 -- 17000
M
Adm.
pj m O
rte"'
C) M
9b Commercial rehab
406523 226650 633173
(30000)(25048) (55048)
376523 201602 578125
j
slums and blight
M �!
R7
9b Commercial rehab
38250 - -- 38250
10000 - -- 10000
48250 -- 48250
j 0
adm
Y
m
n
9a Hutch Hotel
300000 643000 943000
(300000) 0 (300000)
0 0 , 0
O
i
LMI
O
9a Hutch hotel
8500 -- 8500
-- - -- --
8500 -- 8500
n
adm
13 Gen. Administration
25000 -- 25000
15000 -- 15000
40000 -- 40000
9a Housing rehab
0 0 0
265000 0 265000
265000 -- 265000
LMI
9a Housing rehab
0 0 0
40000 0 40000
40000 -- 40000
administration
3 Water entrances
-- 300000 300000
-- 300000 300000
M m at
Rehab Project
O O
"10 I'ALS
862,930 923,354 1,786,
84
862,930 573,922 1,436,8
I
2
i
AdIk
Ask
I w
qw
w
(612) 587 -5151
ITY OF HUTCHINSON
VASN/NG TON AVENUE WEST
;NINSON, MINN. 55350
11 E It 0 R A N D U It
DATE: December 24, 1990
TO: Hayor and City Council
FROM: Connie Mangan W,
R:E: At(F.ND1!ENT TO SMALL CCIT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Your consideration and approval is requested to submit a request
for amendment to the Ninnesota Depaitment of Trade and Economic
Development to delete the Hutchinson Hotel Rehabilitation project
and add a housing rehabilitation program to the Small Cities Grant.
When the City of Hutchinson was awarded $862,000 from the Small
Cities Development Program, $300,000 was for the rehabilitation of
the Hutch Hotel into housing for low and moderate income people.
In 1989, the apartment rental situation charged dramatically.
During 1989, 208 apartment units were added to the market and the
need for the project was questioned by the Hutchinson Community
Development Corporation (HCDC). The HCDC set up a Task Force to
study the question.
It was the opinion of the Task Force that the Hutch Hotel posed
score serious problems for redevelopment:
1. Parking would not be available in close proximity to the
project.
2. Project would not cash flow even with S300,000• as an
outright grant.
3. Downtown location of project not appropriate for the need
for 3 and 4 bedroom apartment units.
Based on this the Task Force recommended that the $300,000 be used
for ether housing needs in Hutchinson.
John Bernhagen and I discussed a grant amendment with Vickie Reph
of the Department of Trade and Economic Development (DTED). DTED
confirmed that under the Small Cities Program, the 5300,000 awarded
t'e Hutch Hotel project has to be used for a housing related
project within the downtown area.
Of the various housing proposal John and I proposed DTED preferred
a housing rehabilitation program for the older neighborhoods on the
east and crest side of plain Street, from the river south to Oakland
• Ave. (see attached map).
The proposed housing rehabilitation program guidelines are
attached. The amendment will also include a request to extend the
grant from December 31, 1991, to December 31, 1992. (see attached
budget).
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES
1. Income - Low and Moderate Income Households
Those families whose incomes are less than:
Household
size
1 $18,700
2 21,350
3 24,050
4 26,700
5 28,350
6 30,000
7 31,750
8 33,400
2. Eligible Rehabilitation
Health and safety items are required to be fixed first
Housing Rehabilitation
Needs:
Exterior
Interior
Roof
Electrical
Siding
Plumbing
Foundation
Furnace
Exterior Doors
Bathroom Fixtures
Storm Doors
Linoleum
Windows
Interior Doors
Insulation
Kitchen Cupboards
Egress
Carpet
Garage
Interior Painting
Other
Interior Patching
3. Maximum Rehabilitation
Loan Amount: $12,000
4. Loan Term:
0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of house.
HOUSING REHABILITATION BUDGET
25 loans at an average of $10,600 - $265,000
Administration 35,000
$300,000
L
n
U
Hutchinson Community Development Corporation
Board of Directors t✓;,�r�i��iv
Wednesday, January 2, 1991
Chamber Meeting Room
Directors Present Others Present
Keith Weber -Vice Chairman John Bernhagen -Exec Dir
John Mlinar Kathleen Skarvan- Chamber President
Phil Graves Connie Mangan
Bill Craig
Larry Fraser
The meeting was called to order by Vice Chairman Keith Weber.
Motion was made by Graves, seconded by Mlinar and carried to approve the minutes of
December 5, 1990.
Motion was made by Mlinar, seconded by Fraser and carried to approve the
Treasurer's report.
Bernhagen reported on the 'Star City" recertification process. The Business Retention
Survey has been completed and forwarded to D T E D. Bernhagen will summarize in
report form the activities of 1990. Our 1991 Work Plan is ready for action at this
meeting. A Star City Self assessment tool was distributed to the board to be returned to
the office which will also be included as a part of the Annual Report.
The 1991 Work Plan was presented by Bernhagen. These objectives were suggested
by the board at a previous meeting. They were then reviewed by Chairman Bullard
and Bernhagen for continuity and consistency. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded
by Craig and carried to approve the work plan and goals as presented (Work Plan and
Goals are a part of these minutes).
The board reviewed the 1990 Work Plan. Bernhagen furnished an update of the
various activities.
Fraser and Bernhagen reported on a business proposal made to the Business
Innovation Center(BIC) now located in Granite Falls. Redwood Falls was selected by
the SIC board based on several factors, i.e. - central to the eighteen county area it
serves and a subsidized rent provided by the city of Redwood Falls.
Connie Mangan and Bernhagen presented a recommendation for amendment to the
SCDP grant for an alternative use of the S 300,000. allocated for the Hutch Hotel.
These monies are to be used for Low and Moderate housing rehabilitation and must be
in the geographic area of the original targeted area for the grant.
•
IM
An HCDC Real Property Task force had determined that using these dollars for the
Hotel posed some service problems and that the money be used for other housing
needs in Hutchinson. Motion was made by Fraser, seconded by Craig and carried to +•
recommend to the City Council they submit an amendment to the Department of Trade
and Economic Development (DTED) as follows:
1. Use the S 300,000. designated for rehabilitation of the Hutch Hotel for Low and
Moderate apartments for use on housing units in an area bounded on the West
by Glen St., Century Avenue cn the South, and the river on the North and East.
2. Rehabilitation would be for qualified low and moderate income people with
priority given to owner - occupied units.
3. Maximum rehabilitation Loan amount is $12,000.
4. The loan would by at 0% interest deferred loan, due and payable upon sale of
house. A mortgage lien would be filed on the property.
5. $ 35,000. would be set aside for administration and be completed by December
31, 1992.
Graves reported on a Transportation Study with the City, County and DOT concerning
fringe road dealing mainly with the traffic of State Highways 15 & 22. Bernie Knutson,
Chairman on the HCDC Transportation Committee will serve on this study committee.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
LI
0
t
` " 612) 537-5151
C 7°ppt c� A� A�Ap (��.,�T
I tl V �" B - J l'✓ �CJ
37 WASHINGTONAVcf�'fJEWcST
HU7CHINSON, MILAN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 22, 1991
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Water Billing Department
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for'the month of Jan
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of January. Recommend service be discontinued on
Monday, January 28th, 1991 at Noon.
. 2- 670 - 0303 -097
Research Realty
HUD #271241613203
220 S 2nd Suite 320
Minneapolis MN 55401
303 Lynn Rd
20.72
3- 380 - 0405 -051
David 1'reund
225 Washington Av W
Hutchinson MN 55350
405 Erie St S
108.47
3- 380 - 0525 -003
Helena Wright
525 Erie St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
525 Erie St S
97.04
cc: Randy Heuer
1914 No Demon Ave
Kissimmee FL 32741
•
2- 670 - 0032 -072 1- 515 -0903 -041
Randy Stille M.i):es Self Sery
32 Lynn Rd 105 Main St 11
Hutchinson MN 55350 Hutchinson MN 55350
32 Lynn Rd 903 Hwy 15 S
35.71 41.25
2- 670- 0230 -077
1 -570- 007.6 -002
Mike Keeler
R J Wyttenhove
230 Lynn Rd
200 W 78th St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Richfield 1.111 55423
230 Lynn Rd
16 Jefferson St S
157.72
390.77
Promises 1/22/91
cc: Citizens Bark & Trust
2 -710- 0727 -093
c/o Bonnie Westniller
2- 670- 0400 -019
102 I -lain St S
John Sandahl
Hutchinson MN 55350
400 Lynn Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
1- 680 - 0040 -071
400 Lynn Rd
Cafe
132.00
195 1`ina Lane
1
Prorises 1/28/91
Merritt Island F1 32952
40 Main St S
2- 670- 0619 -085
645.25
Rick Weispfennig
cc: Milburn Henke
619 Lynn Rd
631 Maison Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson 1.114 55350
619 Lynn Rd
114.99
2- 350 -0840 -064
John Athey
2- 675 -0544 -031
550 Clinton Ap r101
Keith Krormenhoek
Hutchinson MN 55350
544 Madson Av
840 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
145.10
544 Madson Av
cc: Warren Nelson
Foute 1 Box 30
162.45
1'.stchinson MN 55350
Promises 2/1/91
Promises $20 /wk beg 1/18/91
2 -710- 0406 -071
Brian Geirsdorf
2 -650- 0575 -042
406 Merrill St
Vernon Hartf-.eld
Hutchinson MN 55350
575 Linden Av
406 Merrill St
Hutchinson. MN 55350
164.65
575 Linden Av
37.14
2 -710- 0727 -093
cc: Monica Piffer
Steve Rick
575 Linden Av
727 Merrill St
Hutchinson 1 1 . 1 4 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises Feb 15, 1991
727 Merrill St
99.45
•
•
2- 035- 0505 -057
Tim Eggersgluess
505 Second Av SW
Hutchinson Mld 55350
505 Second Av SW
112.57
2- 035 - 0540 -023
Jay Henninger
540 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Second Av SW
98.88
cc: Joseph Pa,`.fel
Route 1
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises 1/31/91
2- 035 - 0840 -097
Wilton Soderberg
840 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
840 Second Av SW
177.90
035- 0841 -082
• Debra Bondhus
841 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
841 Second Av SW
124.65
2- 050 - 0635 -083
Karna Robinson
635 Third Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
635 Third Av SW
163.39
Promises 1/31/91
2- 310 - 0934 -021
George H Nelson
934 Church St
Hutchinson MN 55350
934 Church St
144.60
2- 350 - 0344 - 071
Gutormson Est
c/o Joan Paulson
Rt 1 Box 43
Silver Lake MN 55381
344 Dale St
187.44
Promises 1/25/91
2- 350 - 0354 -044
Geraldine Elliot
354 Dale St
Hutchinson IIN 55350
354 Dale St
129.16
2 -350- 0505 -021
Richard Mattson
505 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
505 Dale St
124.44
2--465- 0550 -084
Don Hilmanouwski
550 Harmony Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
550 Harmony Lane
57.13
2 -465- 0626 -081
Chris Johnson
626 Harmony Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
626 Harmony Lane
121.18
2- 470 - 0540 - 044
Brad Burich
540 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
5 =0 Harrington St
69.82
Promises 1/25/91
2- 470- 0715 -031
E Duesterhoeft
715 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
715 Harrington St
205.23
Promises $1C:- 2 /15,bal -2/28,
(612) 587 -5151
f/!/1CH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCH/NSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: January 16, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
PROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Award of Bid - Letting No. 15, Project No. 90 -25
Demolition of Structures Located in Downtown Shopko Development
Site - Phase 1
Attached is a tabulation of bids for the above - referenced project. It is
recommended that the contract be awarded to Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc., as
the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $36,800.00 It is understood
that a Notice to Proceed will not be given until all required documentation
is provided, and a Pre - Construction Conference is held.
•
JPR /pv
attachment
a
9-d'
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
RESOLUTION NO. 9407
LETTING NO. 15
PROJECT NO. 90 -25
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Demolition of
Structures Located in Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1; bids were
received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder Amount Bid
Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. $ 36,800.00
Fell Trucking & Excavating $ 37,361.45
E & T Contracting, Inc. $ 44,969.00
R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. $ 48,565.00
Wickenhauser Excavating $ 69,500.00
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc. $ 79,925.00
Structural Specialties $ 80,558.00
EnviroNet, Inc. $ 99,808.00
Duininck Bros., Inc. $121,204.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, is the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed
to enter into the attached contract with Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. of
Hutchinson, Minnesota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the
improvement contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications
therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the Office of the City
Administrator.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained
until a contract has been signed; and the deposit of the successful bidder
shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the Contract.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
I
L
11
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
C]
r
L
LETTING NO. 15
PROJECT
DATE
90 -25
Demolition or Moving of Structures Located in
Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1
12 -28 =1990
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc.
RR 2, Boa 179
$36,800
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612 ) 327 -3133
Wm. Mueller 6 Sons, Inc.
831 Park Ave., P.D. Box 247
79,925
Hamburg, MN 55339
(612) 467 -2720
Duininck Bros., Inc.
P.O. Boa 208
121,204
Prinshurg, HN 56281
(612)978 -6011
Landwe r Heavy Moving, Inc.
846 S. 33rd St., P.O. Box 1086
St. Cloud, NN 56301
Larson Excavating, ILnc.
800 S.E. Hwy. 10
48,565
St. Cloud, NN 56304
(612) 654 -0709
Wickenhauser Excavating
Villa St.
Cologne, MN 55322
69,500
(612 ) 466 -5653
E & T Excavating, Inc.
845 Hwy. 7 West
44,969
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612) 587 -6948
Quade Electric
35 -4th Ave. N.E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612) 587 -3030
Ed Rettman Excavating
564 Hassan St.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612) 587 -7733
Rickert Excavating, Inc.
RR 1, Boa 242
Brownton, NN 55312
(612) 328 -4475
9- 121
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTING NO. 15 Demolition or Moving of Structures Located in
PROJECT 90 -25 Downtown Shopko Development Site - Phase 1
DATE 12 -28 -1990
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
J 6 M Tanks
Div. of Stewart Energy Products
Bog 219, Stewart, MN 55385
1- 800 - 223 -2971
Fell Trucking 6 Excavating
Rt. 4, Box 216
$37,361.45
Waseca, MN 56093
8
Kennedy Exc., Demo. 6 Motor Co.
East Hwy. 12
Benson, MN 56215
612 842 -4911
Mathiowetz Construction Co.
RR
Sleepy Eye, MN 56085
(507 ) 794 -6953
Contracting Services Independent
3339 W. St. Germain, Box 1594
St. Cloud, MN 56302
(612) 252 -7471
Structural Specialties
P.O. Box 502
80,558.00
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(612) 587 -6719
Duane Ritter
7120 Vernon St.
Rockford, MN 55373
(612) 477 -5649
EnviroNet, Inc.
99,808.00
7351 Washington Ave. S.
Edina, MN 55439 -2407
44-
E;
3
(612) 587.5151
11 2 CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 16, 1990
TO: _ Mayor and City Council
FROM: Randy DeVries
SUBJECT: Water distribution system analysis
The Hutchinson Water Department is requesting a water distribution system
analysis be performed on our water system by RCM. The Minnesota Department
of Health has in its letter dated November 30, 1990, recommended that a
study such as this be conducted to determine the adequacy of the system
and the need for increased water storage facilities.
• This study will provide our staff information on future system improve-
ments, and the best possible location for the third elevated tank, along
with a proposed year to be constructed. The study will also show if
there is a need for an additional river crossing for a water main. This
study will be a valuable tool for the future needs of the Hutchinson
Water System. Money was budgeted for this work in 1991, and I recommend
approval to RCM for $15,640.00 plus reimbursable mileage and printing
cost estimated at $750.00.
cc: Gary Plotz
Ken Merrill
John Rodeberg
Dick Nagy
RD /ds
J
9 -c�
0 December 27, 1990
Mr. Randy DeVries
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Engineering Services Proposal
Distribution System Analysis
RCM File No. 14042.00
Dear Mr. DeVries:
In response to your request, RCM is pleased to submit the following proposal
to perform a water distribution analysis for the City of Hutchinson. Based
upon our discussions, it was deemed advisable to perform a distribution study
prior to the final site selection for a third elevated storage tank. The last
system wide distribution study was performed in 1969. Many changes have
(����� taken place since that time, both in the City's growth pattern and expansion
of the water supply and distribution system.
rleke RCM proposed to perform a hydraulic analysis of the present distribution
Carroll system, incorporating the existing elevated storage tanks and high service
Muller pumping facilities, using the Kentucky Pipe software. The final model will
� ass n ss q ociates, Inc. be calibrated based upon hydrant flow test and pressure reading in the
arcl�rte�cls present system. Using the modified model, current deficiencies will be
lard surveyors determined and recommend main improvement proposal. An analysis of
future distribution system improvements and possible elevated tank sites will
e ppodundy be made based upon future anticipated demand for both maximum day and
fire flow demands.
We propose to perform the above services for a lump sum fee plus
reimbursable expenses. Based upon the scope of service presented in this
proposal, we estimate the following levels of efforts and cost associated with
each major task.
Task CQI
1. Obtain Existing Data & Inventory Water System
2. Establish Demands
3. Establish Supply and Storage Requirements
4. Analyze Distribution System
5. Prepare Preliminary Reports
6. Meetings
7. Final Report
TOTALS
0 Reimbursable mileage and printing cost estimate
10901 red circle drive
box 130
minnetonka, minnesota 55343
612- 935 -6901
$1,260
950
680
7,220
2,630
1,430
1.470
$15,640
750
9- 0
The above estimates are based upon a comprehensive analysis of the City's
water distribution systems and include levels of effort we feel appropriate .
for this study. We have included the City's assistance on hydrant testing and
pumping tests, as offered, to develop these fees. The preliminary report will
be reviewed with your staff and the City Engineer prior to final printing. We
are open to negotiating the proposed scope of work and level of effort as may
be desired by the City to effectively meet your needs.
Based upon the proposed scope of work level of effort, RCM estimates we can
easily complete the study within three months of the City's authorization to
proceed.
If you have any questions regarding this proposal, I will be happy to discuss
them with you. We are looking forward to continuing serving you, with your
water supply need.
Very truly yours,
RIE L
CARRQLL ULLER ASSOCIATES, INC.
, y(/1
G.,
Charles S. Barger, P.E.
CSB /na
c: John Rodeberg, City Engineer
\J
minnesota department of health
division of environmental health
925 s.e. delaware at. p.o.box 59040 minneapolis 55459 -0040
(612)827.5180
NOV 3 0 1990
Hutchinson City Council
c/o Gary D. Plotz, Administrator
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Dear Council Members
We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an
investigation of your municipal water supply.
If you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report,
• please communicate with Mr. Mark D. Sweers, P.E., Public Health Engineer,
Minnesota Department of Health, South Central District, Nichols Office Center,
410 Jackson Street, Suite 150, Mankato, Minnesota 56001, telephone number,
507/389 -2501.
Sincerely yours,
Richard D. Clark, P.E., Supervisor
Public Water Supply Unit
Section of Water Supply
. and Well Management'
ROC:MDS:Ijd
Enclosure /
cc: Mr. Richard Nagy, Water Superintendent V
S
0
an equal apportunity employer
Hutchinson Municipal Water Supply June 20, 1990 .
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. A solenoid controlled prelubrication line with a valved bypass should be
installed to replace the continuous prelubrication line on all wells.
2. The average daily water usage greatly exceeds the guideline of providing
a minimum one -day water storage capacity. We recommend that a study be
conducted to determine the adequacy of the system and the possible need
for increased water storage facilities.
3. The opportunity for additional training in water supply work should be
made available to the operator(s). Attendance at the annual waterworks
operators seminar, held in the area, is a valuable experience for anyone
engaged in this field.
"rwe, P.E.
Public Health Engineer
Section of Water Supply
and Well Management
1]
U
J
M hutchinson
community
hospital _
a Li!eSpan'- member
1095 Highway 15 South, Hutchinson, Minnesva 55350 • Te'ephone 6'2'587 -2145
January 17, 1991
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and
Members of the City Council
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members:
At their regular meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, the Hutchinson
Community Hospital Board of Directors considered a request, which requires
your approval. The following reflects discussion and recommendation on that
request:
" Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) Amendment The Board received an
Amendment to the GMP from M.A. Mortenson Company for the expansion and
• remodeling of the hospital in the amount of $8,901.238. This amendment
incorporates the contract amount included in the original July 10, 1990
GMP document as well as changes identified to date. The GMP
establishes a fixed limit of construction costs, but does not include
contingencies for design or changes initiated by the hospital (see
attached letter and GMP). Following discussion:
"Motion a was made by Weber, seconded by Skeie, to recommend to
the City Council acceptance of the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)
Amendment, in the amount of $8,901,238, from M.A. Mortenson
Company. All were in favor. Motion carried.
The Mayor is requested to sign all three original copies enclosed and return
to the hospital to my attention, if approval of the GMP is granted.
Thank you for your consideration of these requests. If you have any
questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
HUTCHINSON COMMUNIJY,HOSPITAL
Philip "G Graves
Administ ator
PGG:lm
Enclosure
9--D
M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY 700 Meadow Lane North
Mi
612.522 -2100
FAX: 612. 520.3630
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 710
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55440
December 6, 1990
Hutchinson Community Hospital
1095 Highway 15 South
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Mr. Phil Graves
Re: Hutchinson Community Hospital
GNP Amendment to Contract
Dear Phil:
Article 3.4 of the Owner \Construction Manager Agreement stipulates that no
fixed limit of construction cost is established as a condition of that
agreement "unless such fixed limit has been agreed upon in writing and signed •
by the parties ". Enclosed are three copies of Amendment No. 1 to the Contract
Agreement between Hutchinson Community Hospital and M.A. Mortenson Company
which formally establishes a fixed limit of construction cost (hereafter
referred to as the GNP). This amendment incorporates the contract amount
included in our July 10, 1990 GNP document, the scope change cost issues
identified to date, as well of the contractor Alternates and H Alternates.
The amounts shown on the Amendment have been included in previous Construction
Management Monthly Reports.
The three original copies enclosed with this letter have been signed by M.A.
Mortenson Company. Please have the Mayor sign and return to our office two
executed originals of this Amendment. If you have any questions regarding
this Amendment I will be glad to meet with you at your convenience to review
it with you.
Very trulyy / ours,
�� vV
Peter Worthington
Project Manager
File: Owner Contract File
cc: Gib Lehman - Hutchinson Community Hospital •
Greg Funk - M.A. Mortenson Company
OHices in Minneapolis. Rochester, Grand Rapids. St. Paul, MN • darner. Colorado Springs, CO • Seattle, WA
0
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
Income Statement for Months Ended Decae6er 31, 1990 and 1909
MONTHLY ANALYSIS
CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO SIDGET
CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
Dee 90
%of
pee 90
%of
Increase
percent
REVENUE S EXPENSE
.................
Actual
...............................................................
Total
Budget
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
TOTAL REVENUE
1,153,206
100.002
1,197,549
100.00%
( ",313)
-3.70%
Pollcy Discounts and Free Care
(20,908)
-1.01%
(13,750)
.1.57%
(2,158)
11.51%
Governmental Oiscounts
(211,080)
............
- 18.30%
------------
(167,228)
- 13.96%
(43,852)
26.22%
NET OPERATING REVENUE
921,218
............
79.88%
1,011,571
---
54.47%
(90,353)
-8.93%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
79.881
............
............
.....................
a7.42%
..........."........
...........
I.........
Salaries
534,203
".32%
489,903
40.91%
K, 300
9.04%
Benefits
106,587
9.24%
112,198
9.37%
(5,611)
-5.00%
Su MLIes and other expenses
293,920
25.66%
326,606
27.27%
(30,686)
-9.40%
Depreefatlon
K, 125
3.63%
40,245
3.36%
3,880
9.64%
Interest
13,175
1.14%
11,504
0.96%
1,671
14.53%
Total Operating Expense
............
994,010
............
66.20%
960,456
.....................
81.87%
13,554
1.38%
OPERATING MARGIN
............
(72,792)
............
-6.31%
31,115
.....................
2.60%
(103,907)
- 333.95%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
•
23,004
1.995
26,6"
2.22%
(3,640)
- 13.662
NET INCOME (LOSS)
............
(49,786)
N \MNNN
............
-4.32% 57,759
I \tNN \ \M
.....................
4.82%
\N
(107,547)
\ \M \ \t \fM
- 186.20%
\Nta
CURRENT MONTH - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
9 =�
Dec 90
bf
Dec 89
bf
Increase
percent
REVENUE 6 EXPENSE
Actual
Total
Actual
Total
(Decrease)
Ver(atta
.................
TOTAL REVENUE
...............................................................
1,153,206
100.00%
943,902
100.00%
209,3"
22.17%
Policy Discounts mend Free Care
(20,906)
-1.81%
(8,710)
-0.92%
(12,198)
140.05%
Goverr>•ettal Discounts
(211,080)
- 18.30%
............
(109,992)
- 11.65%
(101,068)
91.902
MET OPERATING REVENUE
............
921,218
............
79.881
............
825,200
.....................
a7.42%
..........."........
96,018
11.64%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
534,203
46.32%
499,311
52.90%
34,892
6.995
Benefits
706,587
9.242
113,961
12.07%
(7,374)
-6.47%
Supplles and Other expenses
295,920
25.66%
273,306
20.95%
22,614
6.27%
De(xeelation
",125
3.83%
32.187
3.41%
11,938
37.09%
Interest
13,175
1.14%
3,672
0.39%
9,503
258.805
Total Operating Expanse
............
994,010
............
............
a6.20%
............
922.437
...................
9/.73%
71,573
..
7.76%
•
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENIE (EXPENSE)
(72,792)
23,004
-6.31%
1.9911
(97,237)
19,16{
.....................
- 10.30%
2.03%
24."5
3.06
- 25.14%
20.012
............
............
.....................
MET INCO (LOSS)
(49, 7m)
-4.321
(78,069)
-8.27%
2a,281
- 36.23%
\NNpNNe
\N
a
\ \ \ \e \Ne \ \ \e.O..M
9 =�
WtCNINSON NOWITAL
Inca.a Statea»nt for Periods Ended December 31, 1990 and 1909
TTD ANALYSIS
TTO ACTUAL TO IKDGET
TTO ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
TTD Dee 90
Zof TTD Dee 90
bf
Increase
Percent
REVENUE 8 EXPENSE
-----------------
Aettrl
...............................................................
Total kdgst
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
TOTAL REVENUE
13,820,207
100.00% 13,6M.No
100.00%
- 133,317
0.975
Policy Dlscants and Free Care
(207,009)
-1.50% (179,307)
-1.31%
(27,782)
15.49%
Gp arrrentsl Otaccunts
(2,121,691)
............
- 15.35% (2,079,930)
- 15.20%
(41,761)
2.01%
MET OPERATING REVENUE
11,491,427
............
83.15% 11,427,653
.....................
83.49%
63,774
0.56%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
............
............
.....................
1,149,301
11.11%
Salaries
5,715,041
41.35% 5,434,962
39.71%
280,079
5.15%
8enef its
1,261,445
9.13% 1,211,510
8.85%
49,935
4.12%
sLwtles and other expenses
3,951,033
28.59% 3,683,538
26.91%
267,495
7.26%
Depreciation
475,429
3.K% 482,931
3.53%
(7,502)
-1.55%
Interest
126,765
............
0.92% 138,035
1.01%
(11,270)
-8.16%
Total Operating Expanse
11,529,712
. _._.. - - - -..
............
83.43% 10,950,976
............
.....................
80.01%
578,736
5.28%
OPERATING MARGIN
(38,285)
-0.28% 476,677
.....................
3.48%
(514,962)
- 108.03%
TOTAL DINER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
298,886
............
2.16% 317,200
............
2.372
.....................
(18,314)
-5.77Z
NET INCOE (LOSS)
260,601
.rase.......
1.89% 793,877
aaa\aaauu
5.80%
......ae\\ooaa\\v
(533,276)
- 67.17%
TTO ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
9-D.
[
•
TTD Doc 90
bf
TTD Dee 89
%of
Inereaae
Percent
REVENUE It EXPENSE
.................
Actus(
Total
Actual
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
TOTAL REVENUE
...............................................................
13,820,207
100.00%
11,824,150
100.00%
1,996,027
16.88%
Paltry 01&Counts and Free Cue
(207,009)
-1.302
(175,333)
-1.482
(31,756)
18.112
GOVernaentat Oiseounts
(2,121,691)
- 13.3511
(1,306,691)
- 11.052
(815,000)
62.37%
MET OPERATING REVENUE
............
11,491,427
............
............
W.IS%
............
10,342,126
.....................
87.47%
.....................
1,149,301
11.11%
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Sa(ariee
5,715,0(1
41.35%
5,121,299
43.31%
593,742
11.59%
cord its
1,261,445
9.13%
1,087,681
9.2031
173,762
15.982
Supplies and other expanses
3,951,035
28.59%
3,446,069
29.142
506,964
14.65%
Depreciation
475,429
3.44%
361,147
3.07%
112,282
30.92%
Interest
126,765
0.92%
41,354
0.35%
85,411
206.54%
Total Operating Expense
.."" """
11,529,712
-
83.4331
"-- - - - -"'
10,059,552
.....................
85.0831
1,470,161
14.61%
OPERATIMG MARGIN
............
(38,285)
............
-0.2831
282,574
.....................
2.39%
(320,859)
- 113.555
TOTAL OTHER REVEUE (EXPENSE)
290,886
............
2.162
............
M,616
2. "It
10,270
3.56%
MET INCO (LOSS)
260,601
1.8931
571,190
.....................
4.5131
(110,589)
•54.3831
\ \Aa\ \soars
\aeM�aaa
\\
..... . \see \e
\a....
9-D.
[
•
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
• HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (OWNER)
AND M.A MORTENSON COMPANY (CONSTRUCTION MANAGER)
DATED JULY 19. 1990
The following modifications are hereby made a part of the Agreement between Owner and
Construction Manager for the expansion and rem.odelin. to the Hutchinson Community Hospital.
3.4.3 This amendment establishes a fixed limit of construction cost, hereafter referred to as the
Guaranteed Maximus Price (GMP). The GMP is the total sum authorized by the Owner
for Construction Costs. The GMP does not include contingencies for design or Owner
initiated changes.
3.4.4 The amount of the GMP is Eight Million Nine Hundred One Thousand Two Hun.!red Thirty
Eight Dollars ($8,901,238) determined as follows:
Contract amount per 7/10/90 GMP document
$ 7,871,911.
Alt. #1 Dining Room Expansion
70,621.
Alt. #3 Mental Health Outpatient Offices
131,903.
Alt. #4 DDC Controls
89,144.
Alt. H1 Fire Protection Upgrades
442,095.
Alt. H2 Nurse Station Remodel
102,702.
Alt. H3 In- Patient M �ntal Health Remodel
42,537.
• Alt. H5 Er..?'.oyee Facilities
85,591.
Alt. H6 Dietary Expansion
16,349.
Parking Lot Revisions(PR #1)
20,791.
Excavation and Wall at On -Call (PR #2 - Item 2)
5,197.
Revise grading at Alternate HeliF id (PR #3)
572.
Add storm drain at Alternate Helipad
1,295.
Duct Design Revisio,is at Area M (PR #4 - Item 1)
13,321.
Extend keystone retaining wall (PR #4 - Item 6)
7,209.
Total GMP
$ 8,901,238.
3.4.5 The Construction Manager shall be bound only by the total of the Guaranteed Maximum
Price and not by the estimated costs for each category or line item of work comprising the
GMP.
3.4.6 The GMP is based on the scope of the work as defined in the July 10, 1990 GMP document,
hereby incorporated by reference, and the drawings and specifications issued by Horty Elving
&: Associates for the Alternates and Proposal Requests referenced above.
0
Page 1 of 2
9-I�
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CONTRACT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL (OWNER)
AND M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY (CONSTRUCTION MANAGER)
DATED JULY 19. 1990
(continued)
3.4.7 In the event that the Owner authorizes changes to the scope of the work, the GMP will be
adjusted accordingly by the cost of those changes.
Owner:
City of Hutchinson
dba Hutchinson Community Hospital
Construction Manager:
M.A. M ,)rtenson Company
Zhbo
(signature) (date) (signature) (date)
by Paul Ackland by Thomas R. McCune
Mayor Regional Vice President
C:1wp51!gmpamend 0
Page 2 of 2
hutchinson
community
hospital —
a LiteSpan' member
1095 Hignway 15 Sou'n, Hutcmnson, Minnesota 55350 • Te!eohone 612587 2'48
January 17, 1991
The Honorable Mayor Paul Ackland and
Members of the City Council
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Members:
At a joint meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, the Hutchinson Community
Hospital Board of Directors and the Burns Manor Nursing Home Board of
Directors considered the following request, which requires your approval:
. Proposed Burns Manor /HCH Merger The Burns Manor Nursing Home Board of
Directors, the Hutchinson Community ;lospital Board of Directors and the
City Council heard presentations by consultant Pat McCulloi of Health
Planning and Management Resources, and Duane Nelson, accountant from
the firm of Charles Bailly and Company, regarding the proposed merger
between Burns Manor Nursing Home and Hutchinson Community Hospital.
The reports indicated additional revenue could be realized from UNC
allocation and operational chances of approximately $612,000. Allowing
for adjustments in the area of salaries and benefits, unemployment
workers compensation rate, and other areas, a conservative net change
in cash flow is projected at approximately $330,000. A tentative
merger date of July 1, 1991 was considered in the preparation of these
reports. Following discussion:
Motion was made by Johnson, seconded by Myers, to recommend to the
City Council approval to proceed to merge Burns Manor as a
division of Hutchinson Community Hospital, provided all
contingencies are met.
Following further discussion:
Motion was made by Kay Peterson, seconded by Myers, to amend
motion to recommend to the City Council approval to continue with
merger process, provided all contingencies are satisfied. All
were in favor. Motion to approve amendment carried.
. Following adoption of the amendment, the original motion, as
amended, was presented for a vote. All were in favor. Motion
carried.
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
January 17, 1991
Page Two
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any
questions, please contact me.
Sincerely yours,
James F. Mills, Chairperson
Burns Manor /Hutchinson Community
Hospital Task Force
La Mae J. Maiers
Recording Secretary
JFM:Im
0
(612) 587 -5151
f/VTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
January 17, 1991
MEMO
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: PERMANENT ELIMINATION OF A REA 4 FROM TAX INCREMENT
Over the years the City had captured the dollars necessary for the
City's Share of the parking program from Tax Increment Area 4.
After the dollars were captured for the program the City Council
would annually delete Tax Increment Area 4 ( the area occupied by
K Mart and Developers Diversified) by resolution. Area 4 deletion
was also part of a settlement with former Mayor Jim DeMeyer.
In talking with Jerry Gilligan of Dorsey & Whitney, a resolution
• can now be adopted to eliminate this annual need. The attached
resolution was prepared by Jerry and will permanently eliminate
Area 4.
RESOLUTION NO. 9415 0
RESOLUTION RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
ELIMINATING TAX INCREMENT AREA FOUR FROM THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA (THE CITY) AS FOLLOWS:
I. RECITALS. The City has created Development District No. 4 (the
"Development District ") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124
to 469.134. The City has adopted a tax increment financing plan
with respect to the District (the "Plan "), which Plan establishes
a tax increment financing district (the "Tax Increment Financing
District ") under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179.
Included in the Tax Increment Financing District is Tax Increment
Area Four ( "Area Four ") . The following tax parcels are included in
area Four:
County Tax Identification number: 012 -0500, 012 -0600,
400 -0010, 400 -0020, 400- 0020, 400 -0030, 400 -0040, 400 -0050,
400 -0060, 400 -0080, 400 -0070.
2. ELIMINATION OF AREA FOUR FROM TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
This Council hereby determines that only a portion of the captured •
net tax capacity (defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
subd. 4) of the Tax Increment Financing District is necessary to
finance or otherwise make permissible expenditures under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.176, Subd. 4, with respect to the District.
The City hereby determines that parcels in Area Four shall be
eliminated from the Tax Increment Financing District. The current
net tax capacity of the parcels being eliminated exceeds the net
tax capacity of those parcels in the Tax Increment Financing Dis-
trict's original net tax capacity. The City Administrator is here-
by authorized and directed to notify the McLeod County Auditor of
the elimination of the parcels from the Tax Increment Financing
District. The Mayor, City Administrator, and other officers of the
City are hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary
and execute and deliver all necessary instruments on behalf of the
City to accomplish the foregoing.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
ATTEST: Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
9 -F
0 C
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Solid Waster Advisory Committee
DATE: January 17, 1991
RE: 1991 Hutchinson Recycling Contract
McLeod County has now approved a revised 1991 recycling budget for Hutchinson.
The budget includes monitoring of the compost site, monies for education,
monies for incentive programs and curbside recycling city wide. The budget
• does not include dropboxes which the county has included in their budget.
Approving the 1991 recycling contract would require the city to initiate
a curbside pickup city wide, progress with an educational program to residents
and improve citizen participation by providing incentive programs. It would
also require the city to continue with its existing compost site and its
monitoring and regularly scheduled hours.
The committee recommends that the city approve the contract for 1991.
•
Cihj Hall Parks & Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9 -G,
1991
RECYCLING BUDGET
Two Dropboxes - Civic Arena and Super America Station
Curbside Pickup - Precincts #1 & #4 - Janaury
Curbside Pickup - Precincts #1, #2, #3, #4 & #5 February through December
Compost Site - April 15 to November 15
Dr2Rboxes - (rate $70 per pull) two boxes
24 pulls /month X 12'
Curbside - (rate $1.40 /household and $1.00 /apartment unit /month)
1,183 households X $1.40 /month = $1,656.20 (January) _
140 apartment units X $1.05 /month = $140 (January) _
3,500 households X $1.40 /month = 4,000 X 11 (Feb. -Dec.)
1,410 apartments X $1.00 /month = $1,410 X 11 (Feb. -Dec.)
C ompost Site
Personnel
$20,160.00 /year
$ 1,656.20
$ 140.00
$53,900.00
$15,510.00
$71,202.00
954 monitor hours (April 15 to November 15) X $4.20 /hour = $4,006.80 /year
Education
Incentives
$ 5,000.00
$ 1,800.00
GRAND TOTAL $ 82,008.80
0
•
•
? -G.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD
SOLID WASTE FUNDING AGREEMENT
0
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the County of McLeod, acting
by and through the Solid Waste Office, hereinafter referred to as
the County and the city of , hereinafter referred
to as the City.
S; ITNESSF.TH:
WHEREAS, the County has been granted certain responsibility
for regulation of solid waste development, as provided by SCORE;
and
WHEREAS, the County is authorized by the Waste Management Act
and SCORE Legislation to provide funding for local governments for
solid waste management, consistent with the SCORE rules; and
WHEREAS, the County has received SCORE funding for assistance.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto:
1. WORK
Local Government Responsibility
(1) Documentation of Actual Costs. The City agrees
to provide to the County documentation of all actual eligible
costs, defined by the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, and
consistent with SCORE. An example of an allowable cost is the
;nailing costs associated with public education.
(2) The City shall return to the County any funds
ad auced which are not used in the calendar :ear or are not used
for the intended purpose (i.e., the budget approved by the County
Board).
(3) If the City does not complete all the tasks by
DecemLer 31, 1991, then all remaining funds for the purposes of
solid waste management shall be returned to the County.
2. FUNDING
The County shall pay- to the City all solid waste abatement
expenses for 1991 as approved by the County Board and according to
the attached budget. The City agrees to pay all expenses not paid
for by the agreement. All billings shall first be sent to the
•
9- G
0
McLeod County Solid Waste Officer, 803 11th Street East, Glencoe,
Minnesota 55336 for approval and processing.
Advance payment to the City from the County shall not exceed
25 percent of the adopted budget upon completion of this agreement
for the first quarter. In April and July, the County shall
reimburse the City for the actual expenditure incurred in the first
and second quarters respectfully. The final expenditure report,
which will include both third and fourth quarters, must be
submitted within 30 days following the end of the fourth quarter.
Final payment will be made after the Work has been completed,
provided that all costs and Work for which quarterly- expenditure
reports are submitted, are determined by the Solid Waste Officer to
be in accordance with the terms of this budget.
3. SPECIAL PROVISIONS
a. The City agrees that in the hiring of common or
skilled labor for the performance of any work under any contract,
or sub - contract hereunder, neither it nor any contractor, material
supplier, or vendor shall engage in any discriminatory employment
practices as such practices are defined in Minnesota Statutes
Section 181.59 and Chapter 363, or in any practices prohibited by
Minnesota Statutes Section 177.42 and 177.43 (1988).
b. The City shall indemnify, protect, and hold harmless
the County, its agents, and employees from all claims or actions
which may arise from performance of this Agreement.
C. The books, records, documents and accounting
procedures, and practices of the City relevant to this Agreement
shall be subject to examination by the Solid Waste .advisory
Committee /County- Board and the McLeod County ,auditor.
4. TERM - The fiscal year is the calendar year.
This Agreement shall become effective when all signatures
required have been obtained and when the funds have been encumbered
by the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, and shall continue in effect
•
until the provisions of the contract are completed.
5. TERMINATION
This agreement is contingent upon the availability of
SCORE funds, McLeod County tip fees, and McLeod County Solid Waste
Abatement fees to fund the attached budget. This agreement shall
terminate at the option of the McLeod County- Board of
Commissioners, if such funds are unavailable to continue financing
the City's solid waste abatement programs contained in the attached
budget.
In addition to the above provision, the County may
terminate this Agreement "with cause ". "With cause" shall mean
that the City is not performing the Work in accordance with the
terms of this Agreement or the Work is not being performed to the
satisfaction of the County. If this Agreement is so terminated,
the County shall only be liable to pay for the Work found
acceptable and all other funds will be returned to the County
within 30 days following termination.
In the event of termination of this Agreement as
heretofore provided, the City shall have ten (10) days prior
written notice of the termination date and if the Agreement is
being terminated "with cause" the City shall have until the date of
termination to show cause why the Agreement should not be
terminated. If it is determined by the County that the City's
default was beyond its control or it was not otherwise in default,
the Agreement shall not be terminated.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement.
NCLEOD COUNTY CITY OF
BY: BY:
Chair, McLeod County Board Mayor of
of Commissioners
DATE: DATE:
BY:
Auditor
•
DATE:
BY:
City Administrator
DATE:
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
���HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
H E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE: January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of "WalMart Subdivision"
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a preliminary and final plat.
HISTORY
On September 28, 1990, WalMart Inc., submitted an application for
a preliminary and final plat to be known as "WalMart Subdivision ",
located in The South Half, Southeast Quarter, Northeast Quarter,
• Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, Excepting the right -
of -way for Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 15. A public hearing was
held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday,
October 16, 1990, and reopened on Tuesday, January 15, 1991, at
which time there was no one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The required application and plat maps were submitted the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4,
1990.
3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, submitted
certification that the proposed plat meets all the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per Preliminary
and Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned preliminary and final plat be approved subject to
staff recommendations of January 2, 1991, and compliance with the
• City of Hutchinson zoning ordinance.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
AVENVE 1.
4
/rte—
oil
I
/I Fes
S
to
'E "Acc
(ME
CEDAR
4
v
U-cs
FALEUO%T
AVENUE
.......... . . ......... ...
huE
AVENVE 1.
4
CENTORY AVENUE
rV
•ADEN
:I
0
S.,1141 LIE%' E I
AREA TO BE PLATTED
NAL—MART SUBDIVISION"
rou*KV •t
/rte—
—'
/I Fes
S
to
'E "Acc
(ME
CEDAR
0
v
U-cs
FALEUO%T
AVENUE
CENTORY AVENUE
rV
•ADEN
:I
0
S.,1141 LIE%' E I
AREA TO BE PLATTED
NAL—MART SUBDIVISION"
rou*KV •t
RESOLUTION NO. 9410
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
WALMART SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, WalMart Inc., owner and subdivider of the property
proposed to be platted as WALMART SUBDIVISION has submitted an
application for approval of the final plat of said subdivision in
the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson
Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder,
and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described
lands in McLeod county, to -wit;
The South Half, Southeast Quarter, Northeast Quarter,
Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West, Excepting
the right -of -way for Minnesota Trunk Highway No. 15.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. That said preliminary and final plat of WALMART
SUBDIVISION is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in
accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such
certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit
required, shall be conclusive showing of
therewith by the subdivider and City officials
above described and shall entitle such plat to
forthwith without further formality.
execution of the
y Administrator, as
proper compliance
charged with duties
be placed on record
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
J
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
9 -y
(612) 587.5151
f1U1lH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
H E H O R A N D U H
DATE: January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR REZONING AS SUBHITTED BY
WALMART INC.
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for rezoning.
HISTORY
• On September 28, 1990, WalMart Stores, Inc, submitted an
application request to rezone property located on Hwy 15 South from
R -2 (Multiple Family Residence) to C -4 (Fringe Commercial District)
for the purpose of commercial retail. A public hearing was held at
the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October
16, 1990, the hearing was tabled and reopened on Tuesday, January
15, 1991, at which time there was no objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4,
1990.
3. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the
request was appropriate for the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request to rezone be granted subject to construction
• beginning within 6 months.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman 7 —=,
Hutchinson Plannina Commission
CENTURY
i ATLANTA AVENUE
[il!5T •
Z .
C . _
' ^' •CDITIDN 'z i
• f t _
3 I e
BALTIMORE AVENUE
AREA TO BE REZONED
R -2 to C -4
AREA
Y DCATONAL
TECHNICAL
NS•; TYTE
•
J a-
C f - 7-,
N 1 { 11 1
1
•
I
N E S E I
2 FMS, "
# r
ai E
i •
Ste
1 •
a
f
' 1a
C[WR
NUE
\�
CHEYr
S IIl 16 i
y = T 1 4
ACRES
•�
` s
.. -
i FREFYpNT
AVENUE
....JAI•
r •f 4
AV
I
WLL
—
CENTURY
i ATLANTA AVENUE
[il!5T •
Z .
C . _
' ^' •CDITIDN 'z i
• f t _
3 I e
BALTIMORE AVENUE
AREA TO BE REZONED
R -2 to C -4
AREA
Y DCATONAL
TECHNICAL
NS•; TYTE
•
J a-
C f - 7-,
WT.
ti 8-3' 25' W C WA .M
1.07 ACHES
b
m
WAL-14ART
F.F.-1064.70
r.
/ �:TURE
S 83' 34' 18" W
z
M
WrI . t
N 83 75' 3VE i N 1 477
A ll ,
FUTURE
N
-i�
PA.11"I'l
d
XJ
41 t,
D O; D
1296.74'
(612) 587 -5151
f/UTCN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATES January 16, 1991
TOs Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
ROBERT HANTGE TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On December 26, 1990, Robert Hantge submitted an application for a
conditional use permit to allow him to construct a twin home
• located in Stoney Point Addition on School Road. A public hearing
was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no one present
who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
set forth above construction is to begin in 6 months.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
_j—
RESOLUTION NO.9411
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW THE OWNER TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME
LOCATED ON SCHOOL RD
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Robert Hantge, has made application to the City Council
for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 464 to allow him to construct a twin home on property located
in Stoney Point Addition on School Rd, with the following legal
description:
Lot 11, Block 1, Stoney Point
Addition
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of •
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
0
9 -s
0
0
•
Lot 11, Block 1, Stoney Point Addition
SCALE
{ _ T,
Partial Copy Plat -
Stoney Point Addition
/ %% . Z
` °,����c 9 a , Showin Lot it, 1310ok
19
5
• (} COO 3)
Z3 's ° 9i I .
\ ' ,'.
\ 17 ,4th j CP
o •R �a1
\ \ fit �,J' • a� \ \q• �C'
, � o
/969
'J
In Wo fer
:cOrdii�cJ Ito '�� " r
r• Go�� \ i...
v P
/f one•/ dis,l�
�ofeet East
`he �nfe�sacfio�
O
5 \
,A
6 NNI
aa N� l N
-\0 t
�d•2'a'o7" ' /
.. f
��- , oa.0 Ok 3dT�
s� ti \tiq R9 21 f4M 35p
:n
r 22 ,a. a
je�o _
90 F i &I 3. 2!'
�•/036Y t
10 Am
b B 6
bj // Nd
14 `�. / / / 4 .: 2 68 80.0 3 431
�Y .,e ho ...46 r C:79.65 •.+
\\ so
:
\\ X5 0
\
1h
.y
0 .e
Ir1 kG? ' fx
1I a
�N +
M
3S i5
O `
/� N V
� f
r
p �•
N
w
f
�I
v
35
35
�N +
M
3S i5
O `
/� N V
(612) 587 -5151
yvrcy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
OL 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATEi January 16, 1991
T0: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECTS CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
RANDY ANDERSON FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY AT HWY 15 S
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On December 28, 1990, Randy Anderson submitted an application for
a conditional use permit to allow him to change use from funeral
home to child care center located at 897 Hwy 15 S. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no one present
who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
set forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
`J
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
9 -K
RESOLUTION NO 9412
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW THE OWNER TO OPERATE A CHILD CARE FACILITY
LOCATED ON HWY 15 S
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Randy Anderson, has made application to the City Council
for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 464 to allow him to change use from funeral home to child care
center located at 897 Hwy 15 S, with the following legal
description:
Lot 18 except that part North of THE
15 and E 23.5' of South 175' of Lot
8 Auditors Plat South 1/2
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffUc conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
1]
•
•
9 -K
(612) 587.5151
0
I T Y OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
- HINSON, MINN. 55350
H E M 0 R A N D U H
DATE: January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
STACEY BARCLAY,AUTO SALES STORE HWY 7 E
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On December 28, 1990, Randy Anderson submitted an application for
a conditional use permit to allow for the parking of up to 5 used
• autos and a used auto sales store located at 1130 E Hwy 7. A
public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991 at which time there was no
one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
set forth above subject to hardsurfacing the parking area and
providing a parking layout to city staff.
• Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
�_k.
n I'll, - .� . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nw cor. of SI/2 of SE t/4 Certimcqte- Survey for Richard Larson
---520.00
S89•2 assumed bearing
Confer One of State Hr9hWOy No. 7
VVIest low of SE V4 of Sec. 32, T 117 K, R.29 W.
SiXTHERL7 PA:<.I:L
. hit part Of the Scuth lial: c: the z;o•.-!.Ea5t '.-:.artcr nz sectic,. 32. 1 NOrth. R aii
2t- West of the Sth Principal xrrvttal. drscri,xl as follows: U^:IkIXLf,a at the northwest car-
ncr of said Soutt, Ila.-I th
.c. s_ P/ the W It I Ilw -).' sI!,I S.-,th lk.lt is or
209 fort " the center !Inc of '.zatc ifi,:h•x-. M,, 7: thc:.z• Oc,th F! dc.:riies 24 nin,tes
asstned beatt::-!, - - 1 0!:4 fall" c-.nt a 520.00 '-vt: tr- so,;t-t,rty,
with sates 272..)R - t•- L:,. :'L!:.t 0: -.'11:.V.I.A Cl LIX 11..a t4'
4;%Cr%bca; tl•,ce Ac:t. BY 24 os', I ell4t , . 100.00 zeet.; trl.!.,rj si tn'r'
parallel wiLr. M"L of 1.2�:. -. t,- t; the!.r,. '.octh 89 24
We". a 100.00 fcet; ^nrn4r ;'.I*'h'rV.. rolz'.l.ei .1-- Sll.I .' • 12,.92 feet t- th,: of
Als:f a 1 flot -11m- for arIvw;-v pi-rrss-as. TL^ cast line of said Ca%^McIIL -A wL. -
:o..: a t ! thc' '
r V. M 7.. I:'CC L' t:;C, . 7r 2QJ " :1 - �- - -ne 1�1'
.LL :.int of 1.'y I
Ir' 7
f mwr.", Lab
7r. 0:.C1- %C, "
ra'd
t -' ", - - - '!. I' ti.Ts rv.. w is orr: ...... i ,-. -, . :.:r .., szr
it. t .1. 1 ir .E .c : .: 7
I I lat� M.A.. L 7..
HANSEN THORP PELLINIEN OLSON INC. BOOK HTPO 21 PAGE 15
— ---. --
10000 106
C;o
9
0 0
Right of sor line ON State Itoy No.?
O
e
C
0
1, - 10 00
200 00
AREA OF SOUTMEQLY PARCEL 1 02 679 SO FT
TOTAL 1400 PARCEL . 27 280 SO. FT.
(IS 760 SO. FT. SOUTH OF RIGHT OF WAY
FILE NO. 18
p a
so
staff in too
I II
": * I-
100.00
58e- 24'E
fy
• RESOLUTION NO. 9413
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW FOR THE PARKING OF UP TO 5 USED AUTOS
LOCATED ON AT 1130 E HWY 7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MNa
FINDINGS
1 • Stacey Barclay , has made application to the City Council
for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance
No. 464 to allow for the parking of up to 5 used autos located at
1130 E Hwy 7, with the following legal description:
That part of the South Half of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 32,
Township 117 North Range 29 West of
the 5th Principal Meridian,
described as follows: Commencing at
the northwest corner of said South
Half; thence southerly along the
west line of said South Half a
. distance of 209 feet to the center
line of State Highway No. 7; thence
South 89 degrees 24 minutes East,
assumed bearing, along said center
line, a distance of 520.00 feet to
the point of beginning of the land
to be described; thence continuing
South 89 degrees 24 minutes East a
distance of 100.00 feet; thence
southerly, parallel with said North
89 degrees 24 minutes West a
distance of 100.00 feet; thence
northerly, parallel with said west
line, a distance of 273.08 feet to
the point of beginning.
Subject to right of way of State Highway No. 7
And subject to an easement for driveway purposes
over that part of the easterly 30 feet thereof
lying south of the southerly right of way line of
State Highway No. 7
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
• health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
9 -L.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above with
the stipulation the parking be hardsurfaced and a parking layout
is to be presented to staff.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
E
is
•
(612) 587 -5151
ya�cH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
. 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Hutchinson City Council
DATE, January 16, 1991
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY ARTHUR BENJAMIN
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a variance.
HISTORY
On December 28,1990, Bob Elliott, H
application for a variance by the owner
and reduce loading space located at 100
• public hearing was held at the regular
Commission on Tuesday, January 15, 1991,
present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
utchinson, submitted an
to reduce parking spaces
Washington Ave East. A
meeting of the Planning
at which time was no one
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3,
1991.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
variance be approved as set forth above contingent on a lease
provided to the city for a variance reduction of 10 spaces to bring
to 16 spaces.
Respectfully submitted,
•
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
q -M.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for TOWN 6 COUNTRY TIRE
4— -- -
I
r
N W
f.L
V
I
z
Q
I
WASHINGTON
ery�Le ah Iseewf,
CHAR
N L .c'� I • 1 nL
82.00
o a�, St9
I N � t�AOILOf ED A091T10V
s � w
c > Ex15:'•,c 611LOON
�' M/MHLMRe
i O
O s
e�
N
Vt LOl epee 11{EL
u
n
1; t r
P
c � p
r
i y I
Y `
•1 '. I 8 2.00
M ~
N y 1 r
^ w
w -
a
EMI! m !Ff
den01l1 iron. monument found
p denotes, Iron manamenl set
N2 rn<A Mam wnn ptae
PEILINCM LANG EYFVE ,tnf
- -- -- AVENUE =
I ^ ✓
N
— 7 -
IB• s n L n r uer. a..
I
PAevLef __
AREAL 9189 SQUARE FEET
t —
I
I
I
I
I
I
W
J i
j Q
THE WEST 82.00 FEET OF LOT IO AND THE WEST 82.00
FEET OF THE NORTH 46.00 FEET OF LOT 9, BLOCK 7,
SOUTH HALF OF HUTCHINSON.
I .he reby Ee•tde tnit INH sur Ve, was orePared aL Ale W uncle• my d,re!t
%UPer /as'au 1"d Prq' 1 qm a duty 1 gensed lan9 '.ur,lrOr •,P.Igf he
laws of la! State . ofNlgN talc
W/tford Pplrnln, lreense No. _ 9626
DeLernt" IS I!4N1
0 .. "( Vi - e.,f e, Ive Nf/ yn Jae
9 -Me
f
RESOLUTION NO. 9414
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
• ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO
REDUCE PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 100 WASHINGTON AVE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Bob Elliott, Hutchinson, has applied for a variance from
Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce number
of parking spaces located at 100 Washington Ave, with the following
legal description:
The West 82.00 feet of Lot 10 and
the West 82.00 feet of the North
46.00 feet of Lot 9, Block 7, South
half of Hutchinson
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for
a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be approved.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger
of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in
the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the
surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in
such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect
be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land
in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or
difficulty.
CONCLUSION
The application for variance for the purpose designated is
granted based upon the findings set forth above contingent on a
lease provided to the city for a variance reduction of 10 spaces to
bring to 16 spaces.
Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 1991.
Gary D. Plotz, City Admin. Paul L. Ackland, Mayor —/41.
(612) 587.5151
f/UTIH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK (2
MILE RADIUS) HASSAN VALLEY
The Planning Commission recommends approval contingent on a 25'
wide maintenance easement along the river.
•
� J
9 -d✓
HQUKO S
S
a
PNmo9e and uldily easements a morn tnrs a daMla< fmn melmmVn 1011A0
I
o donates V2 Inch by 14 fnrh Iron 0.00 set.
4
marked by LKansa No. 9626.
The east bee Of tote NE 114 of Sec 7 n
a _.
assumed to pare a hedr 01 9 t• 32'27• w
-
-
Widths of easements ore snow. On the map
f
1
8,11h mork SO-00 -4 W-th lace 01 poye• We
1104712
Mar S' ^Lorne" of Lot I ElOW -0-
µal< " 'I" or CIO. R." at n0"m one OI Lot 1
_
r T
' J..c�k
• If!'l �
an Nar 12, 1990 r 1022 1 {N G W 19jar
, * c
14 • a'
r'
pads y
Lost .1.1 moo „m
<nr
NE corner of
ri•.
PC
.. .”
it
r`
,l�
• 'Y
•
os of
4
tae
. 4^
1
W84-08'
16 23 '
4t7 - 6
ae a
O � fle.
N•
`I ,
s �y
•
R ..
•.• ,.. \ D E w r4 lone of Sec
71
f- _. .. — - __.___ .. — _'___._
.
;\�- �: \
`_..__
;ice:••••
\
• 1
,' N 6y '1 9 '
ah -
\
\ s69.492rE
3
�i• E p
m v
. ;2 �E
— — `
Off'•
N
��m. m4p
--
- AaO
— — -- — — — — —' —
. j .• f SC' - S2
ail Si
\
's
rn
N
South hme of Lot 9''
N 89. 03'43'W
•'•
ct 4ud tool of Set 7
'
SE m "•w of Sec 7
.. A
cast .,on monument
6
4.1 1 L. IInpM . +ro t Pamela
n wife, [e'- " -ni; and that
r:. Lr•uk, h
if1:
0
If.l>t IIUL..11 nb rte 11I111Y5 ntnr O
0 4
w in
Carl✓ I'atln, In•Ir '.A: CC, nl ll• •U4
t m a
4:alf r -l:fl( .uld r
t
the [,poly Of NC LCOd, State Ni
nd,:NOto, to rot:
♦'�rrlh•II PNi' " -t't,f situated
PIA'r uF st'C"Itw
J. '[nVNSN1Y lit NORTH. NANGF. 29 Vest, described 4a
It Ir:n'c Lnl> i And `1 di t he A�. 110.i'9
north line
of l with the crtnlev line
J at sAld Atdi tor'4 Plat with
f•.l tars: .. ":umm�ei o; at the. ir.:crAe..tlan et the
d to
..• I.'Mr Iit�hrav %p. 25 ([oc:carl,Y
escr
tauE;iuhbecJescrihhed;
thence northeasterlyt flectib the
th
t'
' ''' "' t7. •. t,• a
point on a line, sat" line being the south• *riv ••
2 0 212
a `"/ ;'3
BA33A11 VALi.EY T
�
Hebert B Anderaoq, Deputy Cle ;k.
Edwin E Haman
McLeod County Zoning Adminiatrater
830 11 St E
Olenceo Minnesota 55336 -2270
Jan 21 1991
Subjecti Houkto Subdivision final plat, section 7 Hassan Valley trp.
The Hassan Valley Tom Board of Supervisors voted to approve
the final plat with no recommeridationa, at the regular Town Board
me g January 8 1991.
�� 10 ,
Hobert E Anderson
Deputy Clark
CC City Council, City of Hutchinson
0
9 -A!
(612) 587.5151
f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
H E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE, January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
KEVIN COMPTON (2 MILE RADIUS)
The Planning Commission recommends approval with no objection.
�J
P ' ( 612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E H 0 R A N D U M
DATE: January 4, 1991
T0: Hutchinson Planning Commission
Hutchinson Planning Staff
FROM: Jim Marka, Building Official
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN 2 MILE RADIUS
Mr. Kevin Compton contacted me today requesting to be placed on the
January Planning Commission agenda for a conditional use permit to
operate a retail gun shop within on Industrial Zoned district
within Hutchinson's 2 mile radius.
In my conversation with Mr. Ed Homan, McLeod County Zoning
Administrator, I learned that this land use is existing, but
procedure was not originally properly followed. McLeod County is •
requesting a recommendation from the City of Hutchinson, so I
placed this matter on the Planning Commission agenda for your
consideration.
JM /bb
•
v'
/ (612)587-5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E H 0 R A N D U M
DATE, January 16, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF FINAL DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Planning Commission recommends approval.
•
0
9-F
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
• 14ITlUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 15, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint
Gruett, Craig Lenz, E1Roy Dobratz, Tom Lyke and Chairman Bill
Craig. Members absent: Dean Wood. Also Present: Building
Official Jim Marka and City Engineer John Rodeberg.
2. 11111UTES
Mr. Lenz made a motion to
meeting dated Tuesday, December
the motion carried unanimously.
approve the minutes of the regular
18, 1990. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FRO14 R -2 TO C -4
REQUESTED ON THE WALMART PROPERTY CONTINGENT ON APPROVAL
OF WALMART SUBDIVISION PLAT
• Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4171 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, October 4, 1990. The
request is for the purpose of rezoning property from R -2
(Residential district) to C -4 (Commercial district)
located in the WalMart Subdivision.
Building Official Marka explained the proposal and the
resolution of the subdivision agreement to city staff
satisfaction.
Tim Loose, Bolton -Menk, commented on the past proposal
and also the annexation. He commented on the timeline of
the WalMart plan and reviewed the present site plan. He
explained the plac_ment of sanitary sewer, parking
criteria, future expansion possibilities, detention pond
and drainage. He commented on the truck access and
unloading.
Discussion followed on the traffic release to Hwy 15 and
the possibility of exit to a side street in the future.
There is also discussion on parking possibilities and the
detention pond.
• Hr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by
Hr. Gruett the hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Lenz
moved to recommend approval Df the rezoning from R -2 to
C -4 provided construction is begun within 6 months.
MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
1/15/91
Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried unanimously. •
(b) CONTINUATION OF CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL
PLAT OF WALMART SUBDIVISION
Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7,46 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4172 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday October 4, 1990. The
request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary
and final plat to be known as "Waltiart Subdivision"
located at Hwy 15 S.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing,
Dobratz the hearing closed at 7:47 p.m.
a motion to recommend approval providing
City ordinances and staff recommendatio
1991. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the
unanimously.
seconded by Mr.
Hr. Ebent made
it complies with
ns of January 2,
motion carried
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
ROBERT HANTGE TO CONSTRUCT A TWIN HOME
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:48 p.m. with
reading of publication #4191 as published in
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 3, 1991.
the
the
The
•
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional
use permit to allow the owner to construct a twin home
located in Stoney Point Addition on School Road.
Mr. Robert Hantge, owner of the property presented the
proposal and commented on the building itself and its
Position on the property. He presented a sketch of the
plan. Building Official Marka commented on the
transition of the area from PUD to R -1.
Discussion followed on water and sewer service off of
School Rd. and the transition of the property. ,
Mr. Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by
Mr. Lenz the hearing closed at 7:55 p.m. Mr. Ebent made
a motion to recommend approval provided the construction
begins within 6 months. Seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion
carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PER14IT REQUESTED BY
RANDY ANDERSON FOR CHILD CARE FACILITY AT HWY 15 S.
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:57 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4193 as published the HUTCHINSON
LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for •
the purpose of conside2 =ing a conditional use permit to
allow the perspective owner to change use from funeral
MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
1/15/91
• home to child care center located at 897 Hwy 15 S.
Mr. Randy Anderson, perspective owner, was present to
answer questions on the proposal. He stated the South
and East side of the building would be fenced for play
area.
fir. Marka commented on his inspection with Fire Marshal
George Field. The parking seems to be adequate and
handicapped accessible.
There was discussion on the spiral staircase and the
elevator, both are not to code.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Dobratz the hearing closed at 8:06 p.m. Hr. Lenz made a
motion to approve the request with city staff
recom;nendations. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried
unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
STACEY BARCLAY, AUTO SALES STORE ON HWY 7 E
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:07 p.m. with the
• reading of publication #4195 published in the HUTCHINSON
LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for
considering a conditional use permit to allow for the
parking of up to 5 used autos and a used auto sales store
located at 1130 E Hwy 7.
Building Official Marka explained the proposal with the
parking of used cars at the Barclay site and office at
the NAPA store.
Mr. Bob Powell, owner of NAPA store, commented on the
proposal. Discussion followed on the zoning of the
Property and the proposal of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Lenz the hearing closed at 8:15 p.m. Mr. Ebent made a
motion to recommend approval provided the lot be
hardsurfaced and a parking layout be presented. Seconded
by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY BOB ELLIOTT
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:17 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4196 published in the HUTCHINSON
LEADER on Thursday, January 3, 1991. The request is for
. considering a variance by the owner to reduce parking
spaces and reduce loading space located at 100 Washington
Ave East.
MINUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
1/15/91
Building Official Marka commented on staff recommendation •
and that the major concern of staff would be parking.
Discussion followed on the C -3 district parking fund
contributions.
14r. Bob Elliott, Town and Country Tire, explained his
business and ho�i the parking would be alleviated.
Chairman Craig expressed his concern with such a large
reduction of parking spaces.
Discussion followed on the possibility of a lease from
neighboring property owners for additional 10 parking
spaces.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Gruett the hearing closed at 8:45 p.m. fir. Lenz made a
motion to recommend approval of the variance contingent
upon a reduction of the variance to 10 spaces from 21
spaces and providing a lease in writing to the city for
the spaces fir. Elliott will obtain. Seconded by Mr.
Gruett the motion carried unanimously.
4. NEW BUSIaESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF SKETCH PLAN OF HELLANDS 1ST ADDITION •
REQUESTED BY DON ERICKSON
Mr. Don Erickson commented on the proposal to plat in
Helland's 1st Addition.
Discussion followed on the PD zoning of the property.
Mr. Marka commented on the history of the property and
the procedure is to plat with a subdivision agreement
then to process a conditional use permit. There was
discussion on the driveway exits onto the cul de sac.
City Engineer Rodeberg commented on snow removal in the
cul -de -sac.
It is the consensus of the planning commission to proceed
with the platting procedure.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN IN HASSAN VALLEY REQUESTED
BY MARTIN RETT14AN (2 MILE RADIUS)
Withdrawn.
(c) DISCUSSION OF TEMPORARY CLASSR0014 SITE REQUESTED BY
SUPERINTENDENT GLEN MATEJKA
4 0
0
11INUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
1/15/91
Superintendent Hatejk.a commented on the need for
additional space outside of the school building site and
his options of leasing space in the city. At this tine
there are no buildings available, therefore, Mr. Matejka
is proposing a portable classroom space on school
property. He commented on the facility and the
possibility of a permanent building.
There was discussion of the length of using a temporary
of portable building. The planning commission voiced
concern with a 5 year possibility but is comfortable with
a 2 or 3 year situation. It is the consensus of the
planning commission for the school district to look at
the option of a permanent building.
(d) DISCUSSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERVIT PROPOSAL BY BRIAN
PIENDLANDT
Mr. Brian Wendlandt commented on his proposal which would
not take effect for approximately 2 years. Discussion
followed on the type of building and the use. It is the
consensus of the planning commission that the request
would be appropriate for the area.
(e) DISCUSSION OF REZONING REQUESTED BY TOM DAGGETT, HUTCH
MANUFACTURING
Hr. Tom Daggett explained the layout of property and
proposal of zoning to IC -1. He commented there are no
Plans for the property at this time. It is the consensus
of the planning commission that the request is
appropriate for the area.
( f ) CONSIDERATION OF FI14AL PLAT SUB1 {ITTED BY GALEN HOUK III
HASSAN VALLEY (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Lenz made a motion to approve the plat contingent on
a 25' wide maintenance easement along the river.
Seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(9) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
KEVIN COMPTON ON F; 15 11 (2 MILE RADIUS)
Mr. Kevin Compton commented on the County ordinance
regarding Industrial Zoned District and appropriate
usage.
Mr. Gruett moved to recommend approval with no objection,
seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
r
14INUTES HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
1/15/91
5. OLD BUSINESS 0
(a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL DRAFT OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Building Official Marka commented that staff recommends
the plan be accepted an presented.
Mr. Lyke moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive
Plan, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried
unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION REGARDING LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY
Mr. Marka commented on the agreement being negotiated.
(c) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE
The Planning Commission will hold three special meetings
to review the zoning ordinance as drafted.
(d) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Building Official Marka commented on the Shoreland
Ordinance and bids received.
City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on the MN DOT Task •
Force.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
10:25 p.m.
6 0
DAVID D.AAVOLD
OARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. A.4DERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON•
STE%FN S. 1106E
LAI'RA X. FRETLAND
DAVID A. Ii1t1- EOOEMAN -
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSF1`I1 M. PAIEMENT
JAMES LTLEY
JULIA A. CHRISTIAN'S
RICHARD G. M,GEE
TI40] "HY W. PAPINSKI
0
E
AIRNOLD & MCDOIVELL
ATTORNEYS AT L.Aw
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCIn \SON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 5137 -7575
FAX (612) 567-4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
January 4, 1991
Mr. Jim Mills
962 Rolling Greens Lane
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Mr. Ken Merrill
Director of Finance
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Dry Dock Lease
Our File No. 3188 -89 -0114
Dear Jim, Ken and Gary:
OF COCYSEL
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL"
WILLIAM W.CA -4EROV
5001 CEDAR "RE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545-9000
MX TOLL FREE 000 - 343 -4545
FAX ( 612) 545 -1799
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETOX, MINNESOTA 55371
(612)309-2214
FAX (612) 309-5506
I am enclosing for the review of each of you a copy of the proposed
lease agreement between Mr. Dolder and the City of Hutchinson.
I direct your attention, from a financial standpoint, to pages 2
through 4. It is my understanding that these provisions are the
same as in the prior lease, but in view of the fact that the Dry
Dock facility has occupied the premises now for at least a period
of one year, care should be taken to make sure that our actual
practice corresponds with the lease provisions.
Assuming that there are no differences, I believe the lease is
ready to be approved at, presumably, the last meeting in January.
Do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions.
Thank you. Best personal regards.
Very truly s
ARNOLD & WE
G. Barry e son
GBA:lm
Enclosure
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINN£SO'TA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION n
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION /
III INSURANCE
Box 68 • 135 Third Avenue Southeast
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
January 8, 1991
Mr. Barry Anderson
Arnold and McDowell
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
RE: Dry Dock Lease
Insurance Limits
F srry:
You are correct (as usual), since the City did not renew its
$1,000,000 umbrella liability policy we only have a combined
single limit of $600,000 under the League of Minnesota Cities
contract.
I would also agree with you that the $600,000 should be
adequate. I am enclosing a copy of the limits page as well as a
certificate of insurance which pertains to these limits for your
convenience.
We currently are insuring the City's interest in personal
property at the Dry Dock location in the amount of $75,000. We
also have a $250,000 fire legal liability limit at the Dry Dock
location.
If you need anything more, Barry, let me know.
E Sere
j
Dennis W. o
DWP /slb
Enclosures:
IlI 1,
u
0
•
Telephone: 612 -587 -2299 /�
Fax: 612- 587-0808 ` ` ,
(7) A "city' relief association, its mem.
(2) While acting on behalf of the 'joint powers
bers, officers, and employees.
entity:
(8) Any person while acting in the admin-
(a) a governmental member of the joint
istrative capacity of medical director
powers cntity
or medical advisor to the 'city am-
bulance service.
(b) an elected or appointed official of the
governmental member
C. With respect to a "joint powers entity" named in
the Declarations:
(c) an employee of the governmental
member
(1) The 'joint powers entity:
(d) any other authorized person or agent
of the governmental member, but ex-
eluding independent contractors
SECTION III - LIMITS
OF COVERAGE
1. The limits of coverage shown in the Declarations
period of less than twelve (12) months, in that
and the rules below fix the most "we' will pay un-
case, the additional period will be deemed part
der each coverage part regardless of the number
of the last preceding period for purposes of de-
of:
(ermining the limits of coverage.
a. 'Covered Parties';
4. The Fire Damage Limit is the most "we" will pay
under Coverage A for damages because of prop -
b. Claims made or suits brought; or
erty damage to premises rented to (he 'city"
arising out of any one fire.
C. Persons or organizations making claims or
bringing suits.
5. The Medical Expense Limit is the most 'we' will
pay under Coverage B for all medical expenses
2. LMCIT's maximum limit of liability for Coverage
because of bodily injury sustained by any one per -
Parts A, C, D, and L combined shall be $600,000
son, and the occurrence aggregate limit is the
per occurrence or sudden ocnurence whether a
most "we' will pay under Coverage B for all med-
• claim arises out of one coverage part or a com-
ical expenses because of bodily injury to two or
bination of more than one coverage part,
more persons resulting from one occurrence.
3. The Products- Completed Operations Annual Ag-
6. The Limited Pollution Liability Limit is the most
gregate Limit is the most "we" will pay under
'we" will pay for damages not excluded under
Coverage A for damages because of injury and
Coverages A, C, D, and E arising out of the ac-
damage included in the products - completed oper-
tual, alleged, or threatened discharge of pollut-
ations hazard.
ants as the result of a sudden occurrence and the
annual aggregate limit is the most "we" will pay
The limits of this Coverage Part apply separately
as damages resulting from one or more sudden
to each consecutive annual period and to any
occurrences during the annual coverage period.
remaining period of less than twelve (12) months,
starting with the beginning of the coverage period
7. LMCIT shall not be obligated to pay any claim
shown in the Declarations, unless the coverage
or judgment or to defend any suit after the ap-
period is extended after issuance for an additional
plicable limit of LMCIT's liability under
Coverages A, C, D or E has been exhausted by
payment of judgment or settlements.
SECTION IV - DEFINITIONS
I. Automobile (Auto) means a land motor vehicle, trailer
a. The United Slates of America (including its Icr-
or semi - trailer designed for travel on public roads, in-
ritorics and possessions), Puerto Rico and
eluding any attached machinery or equipment. But au-
Canada;
tonmbile does not include mobile equipment.
b. International waters or airspace, provided the in-
2. Bodily Injury means bodily injury, sickness or disease
jury or damage does not occur in the course of
sustained by a person, including death resulting from
travel or transportation to or from any place not
any of these at any lime.
included in a. above; or
3. Coverage territory means:
c. All parts of the world if:
LICIT CHIC (I1 -86) (Rev. 11 -87) page 8 of 13
'11, ,
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX
PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR
MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED i0
THOMAS B. DOLDER LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NC OB'_IGATICK CR
LIAS'LITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE CCN'PA'IY, ITS AGENTS CP PEPPESEN7A "VE5.
A_ •[.R.ZE: n[r'P.ESE \'A — 'NE
DENNIS W. POTTER S
_ --
-
- 1/08/91
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATEOOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
INSURANCE PLANNERS
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
135 — 3RD AVE SE
CC OMPA R NY A
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
LMCIT
COMPANY B
r>SUREO
LETTER
COMPANY
C
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTER
COMPANY G
37 WASHINGTON AVE W
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
LETTER
COMPANY E
CCC
LETTER
a�
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE
BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED,
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY
CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WH!CH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDI-
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
DA E CTIVE
DOTE (M
DA EYI) OA7E E `-
C (V)A71YYI
ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
. .,A
GENERAL
LIABILITY
CMC 11091
7/01/90
7/01/91
GENERAL - E - 600
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
PRJDJCTS- CJMP%✓'S A,- RELATE
X
CLMMS MADE ❑Jf --ulkR Eti,i
PERS31l A A S5 AYJRY
L+V',N R 5 & OW. P;,c-aps Pg0'K7. YE
:1-. s,'K 600
RE CAUAGE t o %Y CAE Fa.) 250
VEZI�A EXPE\SE IAYY DIE PEPS41 1
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
-.,;,'Tt•J'
+,
AN'Y AUTO
S
ALL DNNED AUTOS
SCHEOULO 0.UTp5
:PE; PERS7M
�
HIRED AUTOS
_
NON -OANEO AUTOS
GARAGE LIASILi?Y
--
•
]NUr
EXCESS LIABILITY
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORV
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
STATJ -ORY
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
(D .SEAS::_ Evo::•ti
CTHER
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS; LOCATIONS / VEHICLES. RESTRICTIONS /SPEC':AL ITEMS
CERT HOLDER IS LANDLORD OF "DRY DOCK"
PREMISES. —
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EX
PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR
MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED i0
THOMAS B. DOLDER LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NC OB'_IGATICK CR
LIAS'LITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE CCN'PA'IY, ITS AGENTS CP PEPPESEN7A "VE5.
A_ •[.R.ZE: n[r'P.ESE \'A — 'NE
DENNIS W. POTTER S
DAVID B.AHIVOLD
GARY D. MCDOWELL
. STEVEN A, ANDERSON
O. HARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOOE
LAURA H. rRETLAND
DAVID A. HRUEp EMANN
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES LTLEY
JULIA A.CHRISTIANS
HICHARD O. MCOEE
TIMOTHY W. PAP IN SHI
January 14, 1991
11
A I3NOLD & MCDOIVELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
5881 CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL rREE 600. 949 -4545
PAX (6l2) 645.099
Dan Prochnow r'
Bradford,,Prochnow & Newmann
75 Hassan Street South
Hutchinson, MIN 55350
Re: Dry Dock Lease
Our File No. 3188 -89 -0114
Dear Dan:
. OP COUNSEL
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL"
WILLIAM W. CA.MEHON
501 SOUTH MURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNLSOTA 55911
(612) 389- 2214
FAx (612) ]89-5506
IOI PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55950
(612) 581 -1573
PAX (612) 587 -4096
v � >
E ry
This letter is in response to your inquiry of last week regarding
the status of the dry dock lease. The lease is scheduled to be
considered for renewal at the next regularly scheduled city council
meeting which will be Tuesday, January 22, 1991.
Please note that the lease requires public liability insurance with
minimum amounts of $500,000 and $1,000,000, and $50,000 for
property damage.
As you know, under Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes, the City is
exposed only to the total sum of $600,000 in damages and the City's
insurance program has been brought in line with the statutory
requirement.
Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from Dennis Potter on this
subject.
The city council will be approving the lease with the amended
limits outlined in Mr. Potter's letter.
Please send me a revised copy of the lease with the changes noted
in the insurance coverage.
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
i I
Dan Prochnow '
January 14, 1991
Page 2
If you should have any questions in connection with the foregoing,
you certainly should feel free to contact me.
Thank yc
Best personal regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
/s/ G. BARRY ANGEQN
G. Barry Anderson
GBA/kt
Enclosure
cc; Plotz - {w enclosure);_ - •
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE, entered into in Hutchinson, MN, as of this
•
•
day of , 19_, by and between
Thomas B. Dolder ( "Landlord "), and the City of Hutchinson,
Hutchinson, Minnesota ( "Tenant ").
1. PREMISES:
Landlord hereby leases to Tenant the premises (the
"Premises ") described as follows:
Space within the building located in Block One Rolling Oaks First
Addition, lots Four, Five, Six, and the West Forty -five feet of
Lot Seven in the City of Hutchinson having an approximate total
square footage of 3,000 square feet as measured from the exterior
face of ar.y exterior walls into the center line of common walls,
as outlined in red on the site plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A
and made a part hereof for the purposes of more specifically
locating the premises from Landlord's property.
Landlord reserves the right to place, maintain, repair,
and replace utility lights, pipes, tunneling, and the like, in,
under, over, upon, or through the premises as maybe reasonably
necessary or advisa)le for the servicing of the premises or other
portions of the building.
2. TERM:
(A) To have and to hold the premises unto Tenant
commencing on January 1, 1991, and expiring on December 31, 1991
unless sooner terminated as provided herein.
3. RENT:
(A) Tenant agrees to pay the Lan
other places Landlord may from time to time
the premises during the term of this Lease,
or set -off, monthly installments commencing
the au.t- of $800.00 per month in addition
utilities and taxes as set forth herein.
31ord, at his home or
designate as rent for
without any deduction
January 1, 1991 in
to Tenants portion of
(B) In addition, Tenant agrees to pay to the Landlord
the sum of $1,200.00 per month as and for rental of personal
property located on the premises more specifically set forth in
Exhibit B.
9_A_ I
4. TAXES: •
Tenant agrees to pay as and for its portion of real
estate taxes the sum of $200.00 per month during the term of this
Lease. Payment shall be due on the first (1st) of each month
commencing on January 1, 1991.
5. CONSTRUCTION:
Tenant shall not undertake any construction, nor shall
Tenant install any equipment other than trade fixtures and
personal property, without first obtaining Landlords written
approval of plans and specifications therefore. Tenant shall not
commence any work until Tenant delivers to Landlord a policy or
policies of public liability and property damage insurance naming
Landlord as an insured, and limits and with companies acceptable
to Landlord, in a completion bond covering the Tenants work
naming Landlord as a beneficiary and otherwise in a form issued
by Surety Company acceptable to the Landlord.
6. COMMON AREAS:
Landlord grants to Tenant and Tenant's customers and
invitees the right to use, in common with all others to whom
Landlord has or may hereafter grants rights to use the same, the
Common Areas located within the building and on the land of
Landlord. The term "Common Areas" as used in this Lease, shall
mean the parking areas, roadways, pedestrian sidewalks, loading •
docks, delivery areas, landscaped areas, service court, fire
corridors, public restrooms, and all other areas or improvements
which may be provided by Landlord for the common use of the
Tenants of the building. Landlord hereby reserves the following
rights with respect to the Common Areas:
(1) To establish reasonable rules and regulations for
the use thereof;
(2) To use or permit the use by others to whom
Landlord may have granted such rights for promotional
activities;
(3) To change the layout of such Common Areas,
including the right to reasonably add to or subtract
from the shape and size, whether by the addition of
building improvements or otherwise;
(4) Landlord shall operate, manage, equip, light,
repair and maintain said Common Areas for their
intended purposes in such manner as Landlord shall in
its sole discretion from time to time determine, and
may from time to time change the size, location,
elevation, nature and /or use of any Common Areas.
G
2
Tenant shall pay to Landlord as a Common Area Charge
the following share of all costs and expenses of every kind and
nature paid or incurred by Landlord in operating, maintaining,
and repairing the Common Areas:
(i) Tenant shall pay fifty percent (50 %) of all
maintenance, repair, and supply costs and expenses for
the public restrooms.
(ii) Tenant shall pay twenty -five percent (25 %) of all
costs and expenses in maintaining the parkinglot and
other Common Areas. Such costs and expenses shall
include, but not be limited to, costs of management,
cleaning, lighting, reasonable reserves, repairing,
maintaining, and replacing all Common Area
improvements; snow removal, parkinglot scraping,
painting, landscaping, provided security, providing
public liability, property damage, fire and extended
coverage and such other insurance as Landlord deems
appropriate for the Common Areas; personal property
taxes, supplies, fire protection and fire hydrant
charges, licenses and permanent fees.
(iii) Tenants Common Area Charge will be paid in
. monthly installments on the first day of each month in
an amount to be estimated by Landlord. Within ninety
(90) days following the end of the period used by the
Landlord in estimating Landlord's cost, Landlord shall
furnish to Tenant a statement of the actual amount of
Tenant's proportionate share of such Common Area
Charges for such period. Within fifteen (15) days
thereafter, Tenant, shall pay to Landlord or Landlord
shall remit to Tenant, as the case may be, the
difference between the estimated amounts paid by Tenant
and the actual amount of Tenant's Common Area Charge
for such period as shown by such statement. Common
Area Charge not to exceed $75.00 per month.
7. UTILITIES:
(A) Heat and Electric Charges. Commencing with the
date on which Landlord delivers the Premises to Tenant, Tenant
shall pay for all heating, electric current and all utilities
required for the proper operation of Tenant's business, together
with all levied or other charges on such utilities and
governmental charges based on utility consumption.
(B) Water and Sewer Charges. Commencing also on the
date on which Landlord delivers the premises to Tenant, Tenant
shall pay all water rents, all charges resulting from any
L J
3
•
sprinkler system and sewer charges charged against the Premises.
If separate charges cannot be made or portioned between Tenant
and the adjoining occupant of the front portion of the building,
Tenant shall pay one -half (1/2) of said charges. ;aid charges
shall be paid within thirty (30) days of demand by Landlord. In
no event shall Landlord by liable for the quality, quantity,
failure, or interruption of such services to the Premises. Said
charges not to exceed $75.00 per month.
(C) Commencing also on the date on which Landlord
delivers the Premises to Tenant, Tenant shall pay one -half (1/2)
of the total charges for sanitation removal for the property on
which the Premises is located. Said charges will be paid by
Tenant within thirty (30) days of demand by the Landlord.
8. USE OF PREMISES BY TENANT:
Tenant shall use the Premises only as and for the
purpose of conducting a youth center.
9. TENANT'S COVENANTS WITH RESPECT TO OCCUPANCY:
Tenant agrees:
(A) To occupy the Premises in a safe and careful
manner and in compliance with all laws, ordinances, rules,
regulations and orders of any governmental bodies having
jurisdiction over the Premises, and without committing or
•
permitting waste;
(B) To neither do nor suffer anything to be done or
kept in or about the premises which contravenes Landlord's
policies or increases the premiums therefore;
(C) To permit no reproduction of sound which is
audible outside the Premises nor permit odors to be unreasonably
dispelled from the Premises;
(D) To place no sign on the exterior of the Premises
or on the interior surface of any windows of the Premises without
also obtaining Landlord's prior written consent, which will not
be unreasonably withheld, and to maintain in good repair and
promptly remove and repair any damage caused by any such
permitted signs. Tenant agrees to maintain its signs in a good
state of repair and to save the Landlord harmless from any loss,
cost, or damage as a result of the same and shall repair any
da -aage which may have been caused by the erection, existence,
maintenance or removal of such signs.
(E) To place no merchandise, sign or other thing of
any kind in the vestibule or entry of the Premises or on the
sidewalks or other Common Areas adjacent thereto or elsewhere on
the exterior of the Premises;
•
4
(F) To park Tenant's vehicles and to require all
employees to park only in such places as may be designated from
time to time by Landlord for the use of Tenant and its employees,
and specifically not to permit parking by any of them in any
service court area;
(G) To keep any refuse in proper containers in the
interior of the premises until the same is removed and to permit
no refuse to accumulate around the exterior of the Premises;
(H) To neither load nor unload or permit the loading
or unloading of merchandise, equipment or other property from any
doors of the premises that open onto the front sidewalk areas,
nor from any of the doors except from the rear of the Premises
and to use its best efforts to prevent the parking or standing of
vehicles and equipment upon the land except when actually engaged
in loading or unloading;
(I) To conduct no auction, fire or going- out -of-
business sale without the prior written consent of Landlord;
(J) To permit Landlord free access to the Premises at
all reasonable times for the purpose of examining the same or
making alterations or repairs to the premises that Landlord may
deem necessary for the safety or preservation thereof;
(K) To adequately heat and cool the Premises;
(L) To permit no lien, notice of intention to file
lien or other charges (whether arising out of work of any
contractor, mechanic, laborer oz materialman or any mortgage,
conditional sale, security agreement or chattel mortgage or
otherwise) which might be or become a lien or encumbrance or
charge upon the Premises or any part thereof or the income
therefrom, and to suffer no other matter or thing whereby the
estate, right and interest of the Landlord in the Premises or any
part thereof might be impaired;
(M) To solicit no business in the Common Areas, nor
distribute handbills or other advertising matter to customers,
r.or place the same in or on automobiles in the Common Areas;
(N) To comply with all reasonable rules and
regulations which Landlord may from time to time establish for
the use and care of the Premises, the Common Areas, and other
facilities and buildings on the land;
(0) Handle and dispose of all rubbish, garbage, and
waste in accordance with regulations established by Landlord and
\J
5
not permit the accumulation (unless in sealed metal containers)
or burning of any trash, rubbish, refuse, garbage or waste
materials in, on, or about any part of the land;
(P) That it shall not subject any fixtures,
furnishings or equipment in or on Tenant's Premises which are
affixed to the realty of any mortgages, liens, conditional sales
agreements, security interests or encumbrances.
(4) To permit no damage or destruction of Landlord's
premises or personal property, reasonable wear and tear excepted.
10. REPAIRS AND ALTERATIONS:
(A) Landlord shall provide the following repairs
within a reasonabl= time from the date of possession:
Repairs by Landlord. Landlord shall keep the
foundations, roof, and structural portions of the outer walls of
the Premises in good repair,'except for repairs required thereto
by reason of the acts of Tenant, Tenant's employees, agents,
invitees, licensees, or contractors. Tenant shall give Landlord
written notice of the necessity for repairs coming to the
attention of Tenant following which Landlord shall have a
reasonable time to undertake and complete such repairs. The
provisions of this section shall not apply in the case of damage
or destruction by fire or other casualty or by Eminent Domain, in
which events the obligations of Landlord shall be controlled by
preceding Sections hereof. Landlord shall keep the BVAC unit in
good working condition.
It is expressly understood that Landlord shall not be
responsible for any structural or exterior portions of the
Premises not originally constructed by the Landlord nor any
structural or exterior portions of the abutting buildings.
(B) Repair by Tenant. Except as provided in
Subsection 10 (A) Tenant shall keep the Premises and every part
thereof and any fixtures, facilities or equipment contained
therein, in good condition and repair.
(C) Removal of Improvements. All items of Landlord's
construction, all heating and air conditioning equipment, and all
alterations, additions and other improvements by Tenant shall
become the property of Landlord and shall not be removed from the
Premises. All trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs
iz: stalled in the premises by Tenant and paid for by Tenant shall
remain the property of Tenant and may be removed upon the
expiration of the term of this Lease; provided (i) that any of
such items as are affixed to the Premises and require severance
•
0
may be removed only if Tenant repairs any damage caused by such
removal and (ii) that Tenant shall have fully performed all of
the covenants and agreements to be performed by Tenant under the
provisions of this Lease. If Tenant fails to remove such items
from the Premises prior to the expiration or earlier termination
of this Lease, all such trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings,
and signs shall become the property of the Landlord unless
Landlord elects to require their removal, in which case Tenant
shall promptly remove same and restore the Premises to its prior
condition. In the event Tenant fails to remove all such trade
fixtures, furniture, furnishings, and signs within ten (10) days
after the Landlord elects to require their removal, Landlord
shall have the right to remove same and sell such trade fixtures,
furniture, furnishings, and signs to pay for the cost of removal.
Tenant further agrees that all personal property of
every kind or description which may at any time be in the
premises shall be at the Tenant's sole risk, or at the risk of
those claiming under the Tenant. Landlord shall not be
responsible or liable to Tenant for any loss or damage that may
be occasioned by the acts or omissions of persons occupying any
space e:djacent to or adjoining Tenant's premises, or any part
thereof. Landlord shall not be responsible or liable to Tenant
for any loss or damage resulting to Tenant or its property from
• roof leaks, water, gas, steam, fire, or the bursting, stoppage,
or leaking of sewer pipes, or from the heating or plumbing
fixtures, or from electric wires, or from gas or odors, or caused
in any manner whatsoever.
11. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE:
(A) Indemnification by Tenant. Tenant will indemnify
and hold Landlord harmless from and against all loss, cost,
expense, and liability whatsoever (including Landlord's cost of
defending against the foregoing, such cost to include attorneys'
fees) resulting or occurring by reason of the Tenant's
construction, use or occupancy of the Premises.
(B) Public Liability Insurance. Tenant agrees to
carry public liability insurance covering the Premises and
Tenant's use thereof, together with contractual liability
endorsements covering Tenant's obligations set forth in
Subsection ll(A), in companies and in a form satisfactory_to
Landlord, with minimums of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars
($500,000.00) on account of bodily injuries to or death of one
person, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) --on account of bodily
injuries to or death of one or more than one person as a result
of any occurrence and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00)
coverage for property damage, and to deposit said policy or
policies (or certificates thereof) with Landlord prior to the
•
7
date of any use or occupancy of the Premises by Tenant; said •
policy or policies shall name Landlord and Tenant as insureds and
shall bear endorsements to the effect the insurer agrees to
notify Landlord not less than thirty (30) days in advance of any
modification or cancellation thereof.
(C) Landlord's liability. Landlord shall not be
liable (i) for any damage to Tenant's property located in the
Premises, regardless of the cause of such damage, (ii) for any
acts or omissions of other tenants of the building, nor (iii) for
any condition of the Premises whatsoever unless Landlord is
responsible for the repair thereof, and has failed to make such
repair after notice from Tenant of the need therefore, and
expiration of a reasonable time for the making of such repair.
(D) Fire and Extended Coverage Insurance. Landlord
agrees to carry policies insuring the improvements of the
building against fire and such other perils as are normally
covered by extended coverage endorsements in the county where the
Premises are located, in an amount equal to at least eighty (80)
percent of the insurable value of such improvements, together
with insurance against such other risks (including loss of rent)
and in such amounts as Landlord deems appropriate. Tenant agrees
to notify Landlord in writing on the date of completion regarding
the cost of any improvements installed in the Premises during the •
term of this Lease other than trade fixtures, inventory,
furniture, furnishings, signs or personal property of the Tenant.
Tenant's failure to advise Landlord regarding the value of said
improvements as provided herein shall constitute a waiver of
Tenant's right to be reimbursed for said improvements in the
event of destruction of the Premises. Tenant agrees that the
total cost of the foregoing insurance shall be included in the
Common Area charge as provided for in Subsection 6(B) of this
Lease and that Tenant shall pay its proportionate share of the
foregoing insurance per said Subsection; provided, however, that
Tenant shall have no rights in said policy or policies maintained
by Landlord and shall not, by reason of such reimbursement, be
entitled to be a named insured thereunder. In the event any of
the Landlord's policies insures Premises or risks other than the
building or the rents therefrom, the statement of the insurer
shall be conclusive as to the portion of the total premium
attributable to the building. Tenant agrees to carry insurance
against fire and such other risks as are, from time to time,
included in standard extended coverage endorsements, insuring
Tenant's stock -in- trade, trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings,
special equipment, floor and wall coverings, and all other items
of personal property of Tenant located on or within the Premises,
such coverage to be in an amount equal to at least eighty (80)
percent of replacement cost thereof. Prior to possession
Tenant shall furnish Landlord with a certificate evidencing such
coverage.
n
12. DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION.
In the event the Premises are damaged by any peril
covered by standard policies of fire and extended coverage
insurance to an extent which is less than twenty -five (25)
percent of the cost of replacement of the Premises, the damage
shall, except as hereinafter provided, promptly be repaired by
Landlord, at Landlord's expense but, that in no event shall
Landlord by required to repair or replace Tenant's stock-in-
trade, trade fixtures, furniture, furnishings, equipment or
personal property. In the event (a) the Premises are damaged to
the extent of twenty -five (25) percent or more of the cost of
replacement of the Premises,. (b) the buildings are damaged to the
extent of fifty (50) percent or more of the cost of replacement,
notwithstanding the extent of damages to the Premises,'or (c) any
damage to the Premises occurs during the last five (5) years of
the term of this Lease, Landlord may elect either to repair or
rebuild the Premises or the buildings, as the case may be or to
terminate this Lease upon giving notice of such election in
writing to Tenant within ninety (90) days after the event causing
tie damage. If the casualty, repairing, or rebuilding shall
render the Premises untenantable, in whole or in part, a
proportionate abatement of the Minimum Rent shall be allowed
until the date Landlord completes the repairs or rebuilding. If
Landlord is required or elects to repair the Premises, Tenant
shall repair or replace its stock -in- trade, trade fixtures,
• furniture, furnishings, equipment, and personal property in a
manner and to at least a condition equal to that prior to its
damage or destruction and the proceeds of all insurance carried
by tenant shall be held in trust by Tenant for the purpose of
such repair and replacement.
13. ASSIGNING AND SUBLETTING:
Tenant shall not sublet the Premises or any part
thereof nor assign this Lease, without in each case the prior
written consent of Landlord. Any merger, consolidation or
liquidation of Tenant or any other transfer of this Lease by
operation of law shall constitute an assignment of this Lease.
Tenant shall not permit any business to be operated in or from
the Premises by any concessionaire or licensee without the prior
written consent of Landlord. In the event that Tenant shall seek
Landlord's consent, Tenant shall provide to Landlord the name,
address and financial statement together with such other
information as Landlord requires concerning the proposed
assignee, sublessee, concessionaire, or licensee. It shall be a
condition to any consent by Landlord that Tenant shall reimburse
Landlord for any and all cost and expense, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys fees for the review and
preparation of documents, which may be incurred by Landlord in
connection with any of the foregoing. Any consent by Landlord
•
P
to any assignment or subletting, or to the operation by a •
concessionaire or licensee, shall not constitute a waiver of the
necessity for such consent to any subsequent assignment or
subletting or operation by a concessionaire or licensee. No
consent by Landlord shall operate to relieve Tenant from primary
liability for the performance of Tenant's obligations under this
Lease. Any consent by Landlord shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
14. EMINENT DOMAIN:
In the event the building or any part thereof shall be
taken or condemned either permanently or temporarily for any
public or quasi - public use or purpose by any authority in
appropriate proceedings or by any right of eminent domain, the
entire compensation award thereof, including, but not limited to,
all damages as compensation for diminution in value of the
leasehold, reversion and fee, shall belong to the Landlord,
without any deduction therefrom for any presnt or future estate
of Tenant, and Tenant hereby assigns to Landlord all its right,
title, and interest to any such award. However, Tenant shall
have the right to recover from the condemning authority, but not
from the Landlord, such compensation as may be separately awarded
to Tenant on account of interruption of Tenant's business and for
moving and relocation expenses.
In the event of taking under the power of eminent •
domain of (i) more than twenty -five (25) percent of the Premises
or (ii) a sufficient portion of the building so that after such
taking less than fifty (50) percent of the floor area in the
front portion of the building located on Landlords property are
occupied by Tenants, either Landlord or Tenant shall have the
right to terminate this Lease by notice in writing given within
ninety (90) days after the condemning authority takes possession,
in which event all rents and other charges shall be prorated as
of the date of such termination.
15. DEFAULT BY TENANT:
If Tenant defaults in the payment of Minimum Rent or
other charges or in the performance of any other of Tenant's
obligations hereunder, and fails to remedy such default within
ten (10) days after written notice from Landlord (unless the
default relates to matters other than the payment of money and
cannot be remedied within ten (10) days and Tenant commences to
remedy such default.within (10) days after written notice from
Landlord and thereafter diligently pursues correction thereof in
which event the time to remedy such default shall be extended to
the time reasonably required therefore), or if a receiver of any
property of Tenant on the Premises is appointed or Tenant's
interest in the Premises is levied upon by legal process or
qi9
•- Tenant be adjudged bankrupt and Tenant fails within thirty (30)
days to cause the vacation of such appointment, levy or
adjudication, or if Tenant files a voluntary petition in
bankruptcy, disposes of all or substantially all of its assets in
bulk, or makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors,
then and in any such instance, without further notice to Tenant,
Landlord may enter upon the premises and terminate this Lease.
In the event of such termination, the obligations of Landlord
hereunder shall cease without prejudice, subject however, to the
right of Landlord to recover for Tenant any sums due Landlord for
rent or otherwise including reasonable attorneys' fees, to the
date of such entry, and also liquidated damages equal to any
deficiency between the then rental value of the Premises for the
unexpired portion of the term and the rent provided for that
portion of the term, discounted at four (4) percent per annum to
present net worth. In addition, Landlord may enter upon the
Premises without terminating his Lease and may relet them in its
own name for the account of Tenant for the remainder of the term
at the highest rent then obtainable and immediately recover from
Tenant any deficiency for the balance of the term between the
amount for which the Premises were relet, less expense of
reletting and the rent provided hereunder. If Landlord submeters
electric current, gas, or water to the Premises, then if at any
time Tenant fails to pay rent or other charges for the same
• within ten (10) days after they are due, Landlord may, at its
option, in addition to the foregoing remedies and without further
notice to tenant, cease furnishing such electric current, gas or
water. No failure of Landlord to enforce its right or remedies
upon default of Tenant Shall prejudice or effect the rights of
Landlord upon any subsequent or similar default.
If Tenant at any time shall fail to pay any taxes,
assessments, or liens, to make any payment or perform an act
required by this Lease to be made or performed by it, Landlord,
without waiving or releasing Tenant from any obligation or
default under this Lease, may (but shall be under no obligation
to) at any time thereafter make such payments or perform such act
for the account and at the expense of Tenant. All sums so paid
by Landlord and all costs and expenses so incurred including
reasonable attorneys' fees, shall accrue interest at the rate of
eight (8) percent (or the highest rate of interest allowable by
law, whichever is the lesser) from the date of payment or
incurring thereof by Landlord and shall constitute additional
rent payable by Tenant under this Lease and shall be paid by
Tenant to Landlord upon demand. All other sums payable by Tenant
to Landlord under this Lease, if not paid when due, shall accrue
interest at the rate of fifteen (15) percent (or the highest rate
of interest allowable by law, whichever is the lesser) from their
due date until paid, said interest to be so much additional rent
. under this Lease and shall be paid to Landlord by Tenant upon
demand.
11
All rights and remedies of Landlord herein enumerated
shall be cumulative, and none shall exclude any other remedies
allowed at law or in equity.
16. NOTICES:
Any notice or consent required to be given by or on
behalf of either party to the other shall be deemed given when
nailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the Landlord at the address hereinabove specified,
and to the Tenant at the address hereinabove specified, or the
Premises, or at such other address as may be specified, from time
to time by notice in the manner herein set forth.
17. MORTGAGE SUBORDINATION:
(A) Upon written request or notice by Landlord,
concurred in by any mortgagee or trustee of the building or by
any person, firm or corporation intending to become such a
nortcagee or trustee, Tenant agrees to subordinate its rights
under this Lease to the liens of any mortgages or deeds of trust
that may hereafter be placed upon the building and the Premises
and to any and all advances to be made thereunder, and to the
interest thereon, and all renewals, replacements, and extensions
thereof. Tenant also agrees that any mortgagee or trustee may
elect to have this Lease prior to the lien of its mortgage or
deed of trust, and upon notification by such mortgagee or trustee
to Tenant to that effect, this Lease shall be deemed prior in
lien to the said mortgage or deed of trust, whether this Lease is
dated prior to or subsequent to the date of said mortgage or
trust deed. Tenant agrees that, upon the request of Landlord,
any mortgagees, or any trustees named in such mortgages or trust
deeds, it shall execute and deliver whatever instruments
(in,luding but not limited to a Memorandum of Lease and /or a Non -
Disturbance and Attornment Agreement in recordable form) which
may be required for such purposes and to carry out the intent of
this section.
18. QUIET ENJOYMENT:
Landlord hereby covenants and agrees that if Tenant
shall perform all the covenants and agreements herein stipulated
to be performed on Tenant's part, Tenant shall at all times
during the continuance hereof have the peaceable and quiet
enjoyment and possession of the premises without any hindrance
from Landlord or any person or persons lawfully claiming the
Premises.
19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:
(A) Accord and Satisfaction. No payment by Tenant or
receipt by Landlord of a lessor amount than the rental herein
stipulated shall be deemed to be other than on account of the
0
0
12
• earliest stipulated rent nor shall any endorsement or statement
on any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as
rent be deemed in accord and satisfaction, and Landlord may
accept such check or payment without prejudice to Landlord's
right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other
remedy provided for in this Lease or available at law or in
equity.
(B) Waiver. No waiver of any condition or legal right
or remedy shall be implied by the failure of Landlord to declare
a forfeiture, or for any condition or covenant shall be valid
unless it be in writing signed by Landlord. No waiver by
Landlord -with respect to one or more tenants or occupants of the
building shall constitute a waiver in favor of any other tenant,
nor shall the waiver of a breach of any condition be claimed or
pleaded to excuse a future breach of the same condition or
covenant.
(C) Broker's Commission. Tenant warrants that, except
for any amounts payable by Landlord to its agent, there are no
claims for broker's commissions or finder's fees in connection
with its execution of this Lease and agrees to indemnify and save
Landlord harmless from any liability that may arise from such
claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
. (D) Lease Inures to the Benefit of Assignees. This
Lease and all of the covenants, provisions, and conditions herein
contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns
respectively, of the parties hereto, provided, however, that no
assignment by, from, through, or under however, Tenant in
violation of the provisions hereof shall vest in the assigns any
right, title, or interest whatever.
(E) Entire Agreement. This Lease and the exh_bits
attached hereto set forth all the covenants, promises,
agreements, conditions, and understandings between Landlord and
Tenant concerning the Premises and that there are no covenants,
promises, agreements, conditions or understandings, either oral
or written, between them other than are herein set forth. Except
as herein otherwise provided, no subsequent alteration,
amendment, change or addition to this Lease shall be binding upon
Landlord or Tenant unless reduced to writing and signed by them.
(F) Surrender and Holding Over. Tenant shall deliver
up and surrender to Landlord possession of the premises upon the
expiration of the Lease, or its termination in any way, in as
good condition and repair as the same shall be at the
commencement of said term (damage by fire and other perils
•
13
covered by standard fire and extended coverage insurance and
ordinary wear and decay only excepted). Should Tenant remain in
possession of the Premises after any termination of this Lease,
no tenancy or interest in Premises shall result therefrom but
such holding over shall be an unlawful detainer and all such
parties shall be subject to immediate eviction and removal, and
Tenant shall upon demand pay to Landlord, as liquidated damages,
a suia equal to double the Minimum Rent as specified herein for
any period during which Tenant shall hold the premises after the
stipulated term of this Lease may have terminated.
(G) Additional Rent. Any amounts to be paid by Tenant
to Landlord pursuant to the provisions of this Lease, whether
such payments are to be periodic and recurring or not, shall be
deemed to be "Additional Rent" and otherwise subject to all
provisions of this Lease and of law as to the default in the
payment of rent.
(H) Severability. In the event that any provision or
section of this Lease is rendered invalid by the decision of any
court or by the enactment of any law, ordinance or regulation,
such provision of this Lease shall be deemed to have neve- been
included therein and the balance of this Lease shall continue in
effect in accordance with its terms.
WHEREFORE, we have hereto set our hands this •
day of , 19
Landlord:
omas B. Dolder
Tenant:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BY:
ts:
•
14
7:7
-i7
T Z I V
7Z:-
Faniny jmsu cnemu
/rArl rAar
•w.�,mrr...eres.�
'IMf UI�MCI
0
December 19, 1990
LEASHO EQUIPMENT TO THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
STEREO AND SPEAKERS
GAR
AIRPLANE:
TABLE AND CHAIRS
3 T:I SETS
FRO AND BACK BAR
LANIKI MACHINE
GASH REGISTER'S
PHONE. BOOTH
WALE_ HAN {GINGS
NEON! LIGHTS
STOOLS
RECORDS
INTERIOR LEASEHOLD IMPROYENENTS
EXHIBIT B
•
•
DAVID E. ARNOLD
CHARLES E. CARMICHAEL"
OARY D. MODOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. BOOK
LAURA E. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOOEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
RICHARD O. MOOEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI
0
January 2, 1991
Hutchinson, MN 55350
A RNOLD & MGDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LA
5881 Gz DAB LARD ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416 -1492 �pO�
(612) 545.9000 d"
�\
MN ro1L rasE e00- 343 -4545
CABLE MCLAW MINNEAPOLIS J'
TELECOPIER (512)545 -193
WX I
The Honorable Paul Ackland v
148 Hassan South v im"
Mr. Randy DeVries
Wastewater Treatment
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
vl�-. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Mr. John Rodeberg
Director of Engineering
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Hutch, Inc. Agreement
Our File No. 3188 -90 -0175
Gentlemen:
OF OOURSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
CHARLES CLAYTON
OAST W. DECKER
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55391
(812) 389.2214
TELECOPIER(612) 389-5505
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(812) 55] -7575
TELECOPIER (812) 587-4095
/kbo,� .
&Y
Enclosed please find a revised draft of the Agreement between
Hutch, Inc. and the City of Hutchinson.
There are a couple of provisions in the Agreement that were not
discussed at the city council meeting that I felt might be
appropriate for the further protection of the interests of the
city.
For example, I have included a provision that the Agreement shall
run for a period of one year (to December 31, 1991) and will
thereafter run on a month -to -month basis. I am assuming that the
city would have more interest in escaping from this agreement than
Mr. Block. If that is not the case, we should change the language
with respect to the term.
* CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
- CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION �� .
The Honorable Paul Ackland
Mr. Randy DeVri @s
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
Mr. John Rodeberg
January 2, 1991
Page 2
I have also provided that the City, in the event of a default by
Mr. Block of his obligations under the Agreement, may rely on the
use of the master meter for sanitary sewer billing purposes.
I have intentionally left the rate language for calculation of
sanitary sewer service out of the Agreement; I assume that rate may
change from time to time or the City may choose a different method
for calculating sanitary sewer bills and I see no reason to lock
the City into an agreement with Mr. Block on that issue.
Finally, I have basically made the Agreement "personal" between
Block and the City. The first draft that I prepared provided that
the Agreement "ran with the land" meaning that all subsequent
owners of the mobile home park would be bound by it. Upon further
reflection, since we do not know how well this experiment is going
to work, I would just as soon not create any property right that .
Mr. Block might assign to some subsequent purchaser and somehow
bind the City of following an agreement. We may very well want
that language at a later date, but it seems to me we can wait for
the results of this experiment before making that commitment.
I believe the Agreement is basically ready for City Council
approval unless other changes are felt to be necessary.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
G. Barry Anderson
GSA /kt
Enclosure
•
0
This Agreement is made this _ day of , 1991,
by and between Hutch, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and the City
of Hutchinson ( "City "), a Minnesota municipal corporation.
RECITALS:
1. Hutch, Inc. is the owner of certain property located in
McLeod County, legally described as set forth on attached Exhibit
"A";
2. Hutch, Inc. operates a mobile home park on the above-
described property;
3. The City provides water and sewer services to the
property and has consistently followed procedures set forth in city
ordinances for the provision and billing of such services;
• 4. The parties desire to clarify the rights and
responsibilities of each with respect to billing, collection and
maintenance of water and sanitary sewer services.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:
1. Hutch, Inc. shall install, operate and maintain water
meters for all units now located in the mobile home park and all
units brought into the park after the date of this Agreement. The
water meters shall be of a type and style approved by the City.
Purchase of the water meters by Hutch, Inc. shall be accomplished
in the same manner as with all other water meter sales within the
City.
J
9
2. Meters shall be installed consistent with procedures,
rules and regulations established by the City and installation a
shall be completed no later than June 1, 1991.
3. The City shall bill Hutch, Inc. for water service to the
property described on Exhibit " A " based on the master meter for the
entire parcel.
4. The City shall bill Hutch, Inc. on a quarterly basis for
sanitary sewer service. The billing shall be based on water usage
as determined by total water usage measured by individual meters.
The actual calculation of the rate for sanitary sewer service shall
be consistent with City procedure as established by the sole
discretion of the City.
5. Hutch, Inc. shall be responsible for reading all
individual water meters and billing individual water meters for
water and sanitary sewer service. Hutch, Inc. shall provide to the
City all billing information which the City, in its sole
discretion, determines is needed to bill the sanitary sewer service
charges to Hutch, Inc. Hutch, Inc. agrees to make billing records
available for inspection at any reasonable time upon request by the
City.
6. The City shall give written notice to Hutch, Inc. at
least seven days prior to the scheduled meter reading date. All
meters, including the master meter and individual unit meters,
shall be read on the same date.
LJ
7. In the event of a default by Hutch, Inc. in any of its
obligations as set forth in this Agreement, the City may, at its
sole option, charge Hutch, Inc. for sanitary sewer service based
on the master meter reading.
8. This Agreement shall run for a period of one year from
January 1, 1991 through December 31, 19991. Thereafter, unless
terminated by either party in writing, the Agreement shall continue
in full force and effect on a month -to -month basis and may be
terminated by any party upon thirty days written notice to the
other party.
9. Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall be
construed as, a waiver by the City of any rights the City may have
under existing ordinances, statutes or customary practices and
procedures. It is understood and agreed that Hutch, Inc.
• undertakes the purchase, insulation, maintenance and billing
responsibility for individual units in the mobile home at its own
risk and without any recourse to the City.
10. Notices required or permitted under this Agreement shall
be served on the parties as follows:
To the City: City Administrator
Hutchinson City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
With a copy to: Hutchinson City Attorney
G. Barry Anderson
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
To Hutch, Inc.:
•
11. Hutch, Inc. may not sell, assign, encumber or otherwise
transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
express written permission of the City.
HUTCH, INC.
Dated: , 1991. By
Its
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Dated: , 1991. By
Paul Ackland, Mayor
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss:
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this day of 1991, personally appeared
before me, a Notary Public, , who
is the of Hutch, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation and acknowledged that he executed the above on behalf
of the corporation as the free act and deed of said corporation.
Notary Public
I]
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss:
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this day of , 1991, before me, a
Notary Public, personally appeared Paul L. Ackland, Mayor of the
City of Hutchinson, on behalf of the City, a municipal corporation
in the State of Minnesota, County of McLeod, to me known to be the
person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument on
behalf of the City of Hutchinson and acknowledged that he executed
the same as his free act and deed.
Notary Public
Drafted By:
G. Barry Anderson
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Telephone: (612)587 -7575
Attorney I.D. No. 196X
• Bba131881175- doc.01
(612) 587 -5151
x1mm CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
January 18, 1991
MEMO
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT UPDATE
The attached request was received by the staff and pertains to the
recently imposed freeze on capital equipment. Equipment Chief
Steve Schramm feels the work must be done immediately. This comes
both from a safety stand point, and OSHA requirement. In addition
the rehab of equipment lost in a recent fire could be done at a
cost savings.
The monies were budget but with
Council approval to go ahead
• equipment.
the recent freeze requires City
with the updates and rehab of
/o -A,
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCH INSON. MINNESOTA 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 1117191
TO: Mayor and Cow
FROM: Brad Emans, Fire Chief and Steve Schramm, Asst. Chief
SUBJECT: EQUIPMENT NEEDS
The Hutcwuson Fie Department is requesting the purchase of 2 new SCBA (self contained •
breathing apparatus) units, 9 new SCBA air bottles and updating 4 other wits, The 2 new
SCBA wits are to replace 2 units that are too old to be updated and are MegW to use. This will
help bring us to cw pkmw with OSHA and NFPA. These items are in the 1991 budget and we
need them row.
Also we need approval to repay or replace the 2 SCBA units that were damaged in the
flashback incident. This could be done at the same time as the other 4 updates.
As of January 1, 1991, we are short equipment because of the 2 outdated and 2 damaged wits
and the 9 battles that are outdated and we can no longer use. Any questions please call Steve
Schramm or Brad Emans.
The approAmate cost for the budgeted items: $9,500.00
to update the 2 damaged tats 1,000.00
Thank you,
Brad Emans, Fire Chief
Steve Sclramm, Asst. Chief
/o -74
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 22, 1991
L]
_ W ATER & SEWER FUND
1990
DPC
Harris Mechanical
NuTech
Plaza Hardware
Reliance Electric
1991
•
•
*US Postmaster
*Merle Meece
*US Postmaster
*Withhold Tax
*Hutch Telephone
Aagard West
AWNA
Boustead Electric
Bro °Tex
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Crow Chemical & Ltg
Curtin Scientific
DNR
Fadden Pump
Hanson, Scott
Hutch Utilities
Isco
Leeds & Northrup
Meece, Merle
MN Valley Testing
MN Rural Water Assc
MN Mutual Life Ins
MN Section CSWPCA
Mutual Benefit Life
MWOA
PERA
Quade Electric
VWR Scientific
Water Pollution Control
cylinders
10.00
air dryer
765.57
counteractant
1,088.50
supplies
11.59
input seal
74.37
1991 mail permit
60.00
seminar expense
150.00
postage for water bills
115.87
employer contribution
777.71
telephone service
254.61
Jan curbside & apts
1,397.10
subscription
85.00
oil seal
57.07
dispenser
102.79
Jan medical
2,745.77
Jan dental
337.81
cleaner
18.04
cleaning compound
16.59
well permits
3,109.50
shaft
89.64
seminar expense
29.64
electricity
513.47
repair
39.80
compensator
90.09
conference expense
11.17
sanple kit
8.00
1991 dues
100.00
Jan life ins
45.99
reg- DeVries & Lanz
50.00
Jan LTD ins
109.57
8 memberships
80.00
employer contribution
415.89
repairs
222.88
gloves
104.46
dues
109.00
TOTAL
$13,197.49
// 7q
2
CENTRAL GARAGE
• 3.990
Plaza Hardware
1991
*Withholding Tax
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Mutual Benefit Life
MIT Mutual Life
PEP.A
GENERAL FUND
1990
*Fina
*Algy
*Blasia
. *Leo's
*Curtain Call Costumes
*Wolff- Fording
*Illinois Theatrical
Amoco
Bennett
Bell Industries
Crow River vet
Culligan Water
Erickson Oil
Hutch Plumbing
Hutch Utilites
Internal Revenue Service
Jeseritz, Dorothy
Lake Jennie Repair
Logis
Marco
MN Elevator
Ols:n's Locksmith
Plaza Hardware
Quade Electric
Rettke, Kate
Schroeder, Randy
Secretarian
Seven West Wash
• Xerox
Zieman, Sharon
supplies 6.24
employer contribution
98.14
Jan medical
329.21
Jan dental
43.79
Jan LTD ins
12.87
Jan life ins
5.46
employer contribution
57.48
TOTAL
$553.19
ice show costumes
44.75
ice show costumes
548.45
ice show costumes
101.30
ice show costumes
155.50
ice show costumes
151.00
ice show costumes
42.95
ice show costumes
47.25
fuel
358.73
service contract
48.83
deicer
344.37
kennel fees & K -9 fees
487.35
repair
30.00
film & fuel
110.46
furnace repair
56.00
fluor lamps
75.60
addl Fed excise tax
35.85
refund skating
15.00
Dec lease
150.00
clerks index system
120.00
typewriter & service
639.00
Dec service
59.45
supplies
28.15
supplies
17.78
service
45.95
refund gymnastics
11.00
refund playtown
10.00
services- M.Swanson
603.50
washes
7.80
1035 usage
466.10
mileage
20.50
1991
•
*Steve Madsen
FBI school
712.50
*John Gregor
authorized expense
1,500.00
*Richard Cox
service of process
50.00
*DNR
registration fees
132.00
*DNR
registration fees
904.00
*MN CLE
reg- R.Waage
100.00
*DNR
watercraft fees
46.00
*DNR
registration fees
880.00
*Steven Mogard
school
58.00
*Priority One
land option
500.00
*Hometown Rlty
land option
500.00
*Myron Wigen
land option
500.00
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
4,692.09
*Russell Ackem<,n
partial pymt airport land
20,000.00
*Hutchinson Telephone
telephone service
1,110.81
*JaL.,s Reilein /R.Chaffee
land option
500.00
*Lyle Emme
rec program presentation
20.00
*John Gregor
authorized expenses
1,500.00
*DNR
watercraft fees
29.00
*INR
registration fees
725.00
Alexander Battery North
supplies
1 =5.03
American Cemetery
renewal
18.00
Arnold & McDowell
compensation
3,084.00
ASCAP
1991 dues
225.00
Milt
Jan rent
175.00
• Brinkman,
Buytaert, Patty
costumes
195.00
Century Labs
supplies
127.53
Chamber of Commerce
1991 membership
45.00
City of Hutch
Jan medical
22,176.22
City of Hutch
Jan dental
2,843.23
CMFRA
1991 dues
20.00
Copy Eq,xipment
supplies
124.48
County Treasurer
DL fees
91.00
Culligan
Jan service
15.50
Dataquest
books
411.00
Dept Labor & Ind
license- Forcier
10.00
Dose, Dave
basketball official
126.00
Economics Press
renewal
19.73
Eileen Goeders Estate
contract payment
1,500.00
Electro Watchman
alarms
180.00
Field, George
conference expenses
60.84
Fogg, Michael
basketball official
90.00
GFOA
subscription renewal
55.00
Glencoe Uniforms
uniforms
170.45
HCVN
cable tv
2,750.00
Hensen, Mark
conference expense
162.82
Hutch Utilities
electricity
18,663.98
Intl Assc Chiefs Police
1991 dues
100.00
Int'1 Soo Fire Svc
dues
60.00
J & M Trucking
pumping tanks
62.50
•
Journal
subscription
70.00
K -Mart
wastebasket
9.97
League of MN Cities
1991 directory
111.00
Linder, Paul
basketball official
252.00
\I
Maintenance Engineering
lamps
125.40
• Marco
Marlc:a, Jim
cover
conference expense
4.45
179.80
Mattsf_ield,Brad
safety boots
30.00
McGarvey Coffee
coffee
54.90
MCPOA
1991 dues
25.00
Min Comm Paging
Jan rent
25.22
MN Dept of Agr
pesticide license
10.00
MN State: Fire Chiefs
1991 memberships
90.00
MN Rec & Park
1991 dues
240.00
MN PIE
reg- M.Schnobrich
35.00
MN State Fire Dept Assc
1991 dues
130.00
MN Dept Public Safety
bike registrations
5.00
MN Sports Fed
sanctioning
32.00
MN Mutual Life Ins
Jan Life ins
370.65
MN Sports Fed
sanctioni - .g
190.00
MN Public Transit
1991 dues
50.00
Mutual Benefit Life
Jan LTD ins
882.74
Nat'l Arbor Day
1991 dues
15.00
North Star Chap ICBO
2 memberships
60.00
Our Savior's Lutheran
coupon refund
19.50
PEFA
employer contribution
4,825.87
Perfo Inc
computer paper
204.12
Quast, Esther /Marty Roof
small cities loan
8,637.65
Schlueter Refrig
repair
274.25
Shopko
hangars
15.11
Streichers
ammunition
36.45
• Tauer,
Ken
refund volleyball
25.00
US West
Jan service
98.54
US ID Manual
subscription
62.50
VanderHagen, Paul
basketball official
180.00
Viking International
supplies
71.48
Witt, Chuck
turnout gear
375.00
Zee Medical
supplies
45.00
Zieman, Sharon
tapes
21.66
TOTAL
$110,889.59
\I
BOND FUNDS
. YOUTH CENTER
1990
Darrin Watson
1991
*Withhold Tax Act
PERA
Star Cablevision
Thomas Dolder
Joe Hausladen
MN Rec & Park
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
Mutual Benefit Life
MN Mutual Life Ins
198C TAX INC DEBT SERV
Esther Quast & Marty Roof
1990 TAX INC CONST
1990
. Wilson Dev Sery
1991
*Omar & Velma Collis
*Ford & Delaine Rolfe
*McLeod Treasurer
*Robert Elliott
1990 CONST BONDS
State of MN Dept Transp
1981 PARKING BONDS
First Chicago
REC & POOL FUND DEBT SERV
Am Nat'l Bank
BONDS OF 1988 DEBT SERV
An Nat'l Bank
• BONDS OF 1983
Norwest Bank
band services 45.00
employer contribution
58.91
employer contribution
34.59
Jan cable
24.30
Jan rent
2,200.00
light show
65.00
annual dues
60.00
Jan medical
147.10
Jan dental
15.64
Jan LTD ins
10.09
Jan life ins
4.20
TOTAL
$2,664.74
8% HCDC loan 3,276.35
relocation services 2,087.47
land purchase 71,960.95
land purchase 25,844.85
deed stamps 409.20
relocation expenses 20,000.00
TOTAL $120,302.47
special agreements 40,041.50
payment fees 400.00
bond principal & interest 43,625.00
bond principal & interest 257,500.00
principal & interest 116,675.00
0
BONDS 198
First Chicago
1981 FIRE HALL DEBT SERV
First Chicago
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV
First Trust
BONDS OF 1987 DE3T SERV
Am Nat'l Bank
BONDS OF 1989 DEBT SERV
Am Natl Bank
LIQUOR FUND
Henry's Foods
City of Hutch
City of Hutch
City of Hitch
Withhold Tax
Ed Phillips
Griggs Cooper
Johnson Bros Liquor
Quality Wines
principal & interest 193,520.00
principal & interest 73,218.75
principal & interest 65,144.38
agent fees 177.25
principal & interest 163,031.25
supplies
1,356.91
lottery sales
239.00
lottery sales
214.00
payroll
5,125.94
employer contributions
350.94
wine & liquor
3,174.09
wine & liquor
1,219.01
wine & liquor
3,940.23
wine & liquor
2,070.85
TOTAL
$17,690.97
0
772 '0
Fa.
JOHN J. BERNHAGEN
Assistant Minority Leader
Senator 21st District
Route 1, Box 122
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Phone: (612) 587 -6508
During Session:
113 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Phone: (612) 296 -4131
January 17, 1991
TO: Cities in Senate District 21
FROM: Senator John Bernhagen
RE: Local Government Aid Cuts
lti
�� �� ,,r -- K; 1 , ^1.
FOn 105" �rOs,�VI►,T'�J"
Today I received a report from the Department of Revenue that
describes the cuts that will be made based on one of the
recommendations for balancing the shortfall in the current
biennium, 1990 -91.
e It is my understanding these
July payment. As far as the
one -time borrowing from the
immediately on July 1, 1991
1992 -93 fiscal year based on
cities.
cuts will be a reduction from the
state is concerned it will be a
rainy day fund, being repaid
-- in the beginning of the state's
the amounts of the reduction to
I will attempt to keep you posted as we try to deal with the cuts
needed to balance the state's budget. I believe the
administration recognizes these are dollars previously allocated
which are now a part of your commitment in performing the
necessary services to your community.
•
COMMITTEES • Economic Development & Housing • Environment & Natural Resources
Rules & Administration • Taxes & Tax Laws • Transportation
Senate
State of Minnesota
111
KILLIOI USE cur;
•
ISf7AAT11
I
IAf 1911
t.11tslll
FINAL
FINAL
CEnIFIU
CITY
►01tIA1
PAT Ifll 102 loll
11"al"
111
091
1911
PAT 91
owl 91
clftlnt►
TACOnrI
1111110[
of 1111111
.
CO t7T
........_
CIE City IAIE
......................... ...............................
LGA
149A1 All
PACA
...................................................................................__............_.....
owA
1111
All
list
IASI ; UA cut
60 111 cat I/CA
.....___.........._.._.........
cut NI
COT
lowly CUT
10 1100
I VATCR11111
251,214
10.217
102.611
If,1S1
211,611
511,011
11.111
11.904
1
0
4
1
11 0100
1 RASOfA
11,255
1.211
11,512
1
RIMS
11,101
11111
1.111
1
1
4
1
411100
1IIAIIOE
111.152
14,186
11,11?
5.947
1I,SS9
111,111
1,210
4,260
1
1
1
1
41 0111
1 RICA
1.611
1339
I
5.121
21.111
12,111
ill
661
1
1
1
1
II 1501
111LF1
114.710
20,219
11.016
11
161,651
123,121
i,s11
6.561
1
1
1
1
11 it
1 IEINICIS
MIMI
12,171
29,SIS
1,113
11,011
111,751
1,110
0
1
1
0
4
II If
1 IAA! I11TO1
116,616
20,971
51
33,17§
111.121
190,911
3
3,19E
1
1
1
1
41 45N
I ILOIEICE
1,391
111
1.902
It
1,219
11,519
2S1
PSI
1
0
1
1
11 NN
1 typo
11.961
1,121
16,002
I
11.115
11.329
1,611
1,612
1
1
1
1
421100
1111S11LL
1
01319
119,511
5,215
1
1.991,116
10.657
61,657
1
1
1
1
420210
1 IILAI01
96.161
0.117
S1.143
1.111
166,106
111.321
$,ill
5,610
1
1
0
1
it 1101
I II IIFOIA
116.762
I0,319
10,1S1
1.111
112,$11
151,111
1,111
1.219
1
1
0
0
12 0100
I CARIII
26.011
1.061
11,171
MAY
11,110
11,171
]ms
1,315
4
1
0
1
121200
1lossrl,l
61.111
111,511
16.101
6.526
51.161
111,221
2.101
1.101
0
1
1
0
12 1400
I TRACT
129.641
6S,171
162,111
11,512
210.511
191,911
11,111
11,117
1
1
0
1
12 0100
1 CRAY
11,310
5,111
11.161
132
ISMS
11,101
1.502
I,SDD
1
0
1
0
42 4101
1 COi711101O1A
01,716
26.129
S4,S72
I
195,142
111,011
1,111 ;
4,30
1
1
0
1
12 1101
1 TAUNTON
5.161
595
11611
0
Llli
11,111
212
111
1
1
1
1
Il PLO$
I PLATO
ISMS
1.119
10,591
II,SIO
15,310
161,101
2,110
1,111
a
1
1
0
111100
IIISCAT
2.111
ITS
4.111
1
1.119
11,199
221
127
1
1
1
1
17 Opo0
1 SILVER LAU
11.112
1$.929
70.710
11,611
111.151
20,972
1.111
1.911
1
1
1
1
--� 43 IAN
I MRCIIFMiar^
1.111.911
171,121
116,28
11.116
1,511,691
1,116,011
11,119
51,119
1
1
1
4
43 1100
I CLIOCOE
$71.110
11,511
01.512
11,611
122,161
1,119.11s
11.131
21,151
1
1
0
4
it 1100
1 /11STE1
211.111
11,016
100,311
119SI
111.409
511,511
11,204
11.201
1
1
1
1
111200
10/1091101
95.159
is,111
$5.303
11,107
111,151
151,111
5,212
5,211
1
1
1
4
11 0100
1 STEWART�
96.910
15,58
51.111
11,58
111.01
111.01
5.946
5.946
1
Il Me
1 LESTER PRIME
07.017
11,141
96,501
5.110
29140
121,611
1,611
1.167
0
0
0
0
11 4149
1 FAAMIIEI
211.1ss
21,70
61,511
2S,14S
114.579
-
111.651
1,515
1.515
0
1
0
1
14 OS01
I MISS
21.011
1,111
0.18
1.10
19,1$2
61.290
1.3m
I.Ist
6
B
0
e
11 0104
1 A049
16.295
254
All
it
7.321
11.175
111
Ill
1
0
1
B
45 0101
1 MAIM
16.711
515
1.195
0
5.20
22.599
451
160
0
0
6
0
1511!0
1IMOLOEI
0.211
7.06
12.021
1.211
31,00
11,710
1.911
1.90
0
0
0
E
I9 SIPS
1 PALO
$1.127
9.00
11.961
11.2A1
110,551
18.195
11,07.
1,007
0
0
0
0
Is 02
1 Atlyl.i
10.167
15.603
21,021
0
71,111
201,115
1.225
1.225
0
0
e
0
1! 1200
1 STFIUFA
$2.111
1.3s)
10.015
1
MISS
1110.11$
1.68
1.68
0
0
6
0
15 000
1 KIM
4.112
496
1.051
0
2.619
MOAT
761
201
0
0
a
0
IS 1301
1 STEAII'NISI
10,120
2117
171
1
1.791
12.111
216
He
1
1
0
0
is 1500
1 VAE1f1
211.322
16.129
11,211
0
133,9Sf
161,110
1.112
1,112
1
0
0
1
15 0700
E FIDDLE 11111
11.39
55S
1.511
0
1.211
10.110
611
611
1
I
1
0
IS #$to
I rtYCLA
10.119
1.192
(.ISO
IMP
22.911
17215
1.141
1.111
1
0
1
1
IS IIOO
I 11111
19.01
1.601
2.Al$
115
5.641
26.116
$I? '
SIT
1
0
1
1
116700
1 00171t19
16.111
2311
12,01
104
10,82
49.660
1.0a6
1.001
0
1
0
1
46 1900
1 sAFtltMi
11610)
TA,III
101,214
13,511
101.01
111.213
10.017
11.071
0
0
1
1
16 Me
1 601IADA
13.111
I.TSI
11,157
Ile
)LOSS
11,111
IJIS
1.613
1
0
0
1
16 RIPS
I TRIIOAf
111.111
20,651
4J,AS1
MAY
155.217
106,295
6.101
1.167
0
4
1
0
16 0100
1 CF.TLOI
45,111
7,116
42.514
ISMS
II5.IA4
161,111
1.111
1,111
1
1
1
1
IE 1200
I FROM
114.922
11.491
14.611
1.112
ARMS
116,111
- 1.212
1.232
1
1
1
1
If 1104
1 MYORT
111.663
16.922
0,151
3,19
IaI.SII
231395
1.111
1,113
0
0
1
0
SU01AI7 AWAY
CITItl
ISO AILL101 COT
COURT
All
I'AT 1111
fly 1111
fly 1511
1 of
1 or
C,UnTIT
All
1RIIrt1
UNITS IITI
UNITS IITI
All
AM RI
111 TOTAL
11 a All
10 11 111
ACA
little
116.M.S1T
11.133.111
145.171.116
n
a
lot Met)
161.781,111
1.321321
157.01.111
It
211
CITY TOTAL
1111
(15,151.121
1251.!11,211
11
64
10UILIIA11111 AIA
I6TRO
2.111,711
4.111
2.517.215
61
11
001 -116110
6.111.911
1.117
II.M.111
22
27
ant TOTAL
(11,415.616
11.125
111.111.115
is
to
uCA
IFTRO
55.112.616
1.420,100
WIS7.S16
1
11
IN frill)
17.037.771
251.210
ft.711.011
1
5
CITY TOTAL
IISI!11,111
11.AT1.115
1156,111,511
4
I5
ICA
IFT10
1,056.116
0
1
111
111
/O0 111110
11.11A.n7
14
11.221.111
711
211
CITY TOTAL
111.171.467
111
111.211.651
M
117
TOTAL 111
IITIO
256.101.116
11.310,111
212 .36.01
1
lA
NO RTTrO
214.531.010
1.171.111S
IWIS2.115
1
7
CITY TOTAL
4S11331.11A
121,512,210
1111,211,676
1
IT
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
RE:
CGMC Member Cities
Tim Flaherty
January 17, 1991
Governor's Proposed Budget Cuts
FOR YOUR INFORf44AT10►1
Governor Carlson has released his proposal for balancing the state's 1990 -91 budget.
This proposal includes $50 million in cuts in state aids to cities, towns and counties. The
cuts would be equal to 2.052% of each city's revenue base (total certified levy plus LGA).
An estimate of these amounts for Coalition cities is attached. These estimates are based on
your 1990 levies and aids. The actual cuts based on 1991 figures will be somewhat larger.
These cuts would be taken from your July aid payment. The Governor has indicated
that even larger cuts from the December payment are being considered Of course, there
will be no opportunity in 1991 to increase your property tax levies to make up for this loss
of revenue.
It is important to oppose this proposal now. If cities do not voice their concern and
opposition, even larger cuts are likely later in the session. This proposal may move very
quickly through the Legislature- perhaps passing as early as the end of next week. It is vital
few days. The following are some of the key issues that cities should raise.
• Most of this biennium's budget deficit is caused by state spending increases.
Cities didn't contribute to the problem, and they and their residents should not
have to pay for it.
• The state is trying to shift its budget problem onto cities rather than cutting
state programs or using state reserves. This will leave hundreds of cities to
deal with the fiscal mess created by the state.
• Governor Carlson has said that no state layoffs would be needed, but they
may be needed in cities. This is an unfair and inappropriate solution to a
problem caused by state spending.
The Coalition will be meeting on Wednesday, January 23 at 2:00 P.M. This will be
an important meeting and all Coalition members should try to attend. If you can arrive
early, spend some time at the Capitol meeting with your legislators about this issue.
TPF /cm
o1•n -1991
e
I
f
COALITION OF GREATER MINNESOTA CITIES
THE BRIGGS wnd MORGAN PROPERTY TAX MODEL
.......................................................................................... ...............................
CGMC91. 002 -- IMPACT OF GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED AID CUTS ON CITIES
...................................................................................... ...............................
COALITION OF GREATER MINNESOTA CITIES
0
90 TMR
EST 91 LGA
EST 91 CUT
ALBERT LEA
93.16
3,564,109
- 119,474
ALEXANDRIA
98.41
1,147,572
- 52,552
AUSTIN
116.68
3,819,045
- 154,317
BEMIDJI
110.67
2,118,076
- 63,212
BENSON
98.64
729,780
- 20,596
BRAINERD
87.48
1,817,954
-73,484
BRECKENRIDGE
94.33
907,501
- 25,655
CAMBRIDGE
108.34
325,714
- 20,488
CLOQUET
119.09
1,787,145
- 89,412
CROOKSTON
104.95
1,519,671
-62,001
DETROIT LAKES
113.19
1,094,076
-40,729
EAST GRAND FORKS
110.81
1,288,961
- 59,229
FAIRMONT
91.21
1,857,707
- 71,167
FARIBAULT
106.28
3,060,480
- 103,669
FERGUS FALLS
101.77
2,412,996
- 84,506
GOODVIEW
113.97
163,194
- 15,551
GRAND RAPIDS
105.23
1,188,437
- 58,142
HUTCHINSON
119.87
1,190,270
- 76,455
INTERNATIONAL FALLS
103.23
1,592,421
- 73,159
JACKSON
90.01
689,821
- 26,467
LAKE CITY
105.41
620,007
- 28,345
LE SUEUR
104.53
554,168
- 20,377
LITCHFIELD
88.44
853,289
- 34,961
LITTLE FALLS
113.85
1,368,627
- 47,484
LUVERNE
94.50
850,327
- 27,072
MANKATO
102.48
4,401,051
-223,909
MARSHALL
96.65
1,256,860
- 59,032
MOORHEAD
107.24
3,918,172
- 136,950
NORA
109.19
393,452
-13,376
MORRIS
106.09
811,580
- 34,090
NEW ULM
88.40
2,201,502
- 85,128
NORTH MANKATO
99.64
1,357,320
- 62,117
NORTHFIELD
120.82
1,240,162
- 68,940
OWATONNA
106.94
2,483,833
-122,629 -
PIPESTONE
90.34
670,357
- 26,204
REDWOOD FALLS
115.44
804,178
- 35,813
ROCHESTER
109.52
6,213,244
- 410,004
SARTELL
109.85
230,508
- 23,025
SAUK RAPIDS
104.97
887,118
- 35,330 -
ST CLOW
106.33
5,777,461
- 329,317
ST JAMES
97.00
680,660
- 23,351
ST PETER
118.46
972,197
- 40,540
THIEF RIVER FALLS
147.42
941,270
- 49,819
WASECA
95.26
1,276,831
- 46,817
WILLMAR
101.85
2,111,028
- 86,504
WINDOM
131.95
537,220
- 30,459
WINONA
109.99
4,078,464
- 177,226
WORTHINGTON
108.82
1,544,497
- 75,716
GROUP TOTALS
106.39
81,310,313
-3,644,801
0
FOR YOUR IfVFOR1tATi0N
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY
SYSTEM
BOARD
December 10,
1990
Present: Arlen LaCombe Representing: Big Stone County
Judy Bohm
Chippewa County
Dorothy Tebben
Chippewa County
Stan Jacobson
Chippewa County
Peg Mossberg
Kandiyohi County
Howard Christiansen
"
Kandiyohi County
LeRoy Jans
'
Lac Qui Parle County
Jan Kreie
McLeod County
Joanne Sneer
McLeod County
Shirley Nowak
"
McLeod County
Marie Schoener
'
Meeker County
Howard Turck
Meeker County
John Miller
"
Meeker County
Gale Dahlager
Renville County
Lorna Carlson
"
Swift County
Nancy Aaseth
Bird Island
John Nevins
Dawson
Noel Phifer
Glencoe
Sandy Casper
Graceville
Maxine Weinrich -
Granite Falls
Delores Brunner
"
Hutchinson
Howard Tengwall
Kerkhoven
Nancy Alsop
Litchfield
Judy Oestreich
Litchfield
John Schulstad
"
Madison
Helen Mahnke
Monte Matheson
Olivia
Ortonville
Jeanette Buchanan
Willmar
Carol Conradi
Willmar
Ric Emery
"
Willmar
Absent: LaVerna Birkland*
Representing:
Kandiyohi County
Dean Aarvig
Kandiyohi County
Nancy Dickson
Renville County
John Langan
Swift County
Lois Anderson*
Yellow Medicine County
Myron Hagelstrom
Yellow Medicine County
Elizabeth Erickson*
Appleton
Richard Baysinger*
'
Benson -
Millie Woller
Fairfax
Dale Degner
Hector
William Scherer*
Hutchinson
Kevin Mulder*
Renville
Also Present: Burton Sundberg, Director
Kathy Matson, Associate Director
Visitors: David Lauritsen, Chippewa County
Library
Barb Hauer, Ortonville Librarian
;.nn Lauer, Graceville Librarian
Bill Pollard, SAMMIE Director
The Pioneerland Library System board meeting
was
held December 10, 1990, 7:30 p.m.
President Ric Emery called the meeting to
order.
V11 call was taken using a pass -
around sheet. Burton Sundberg listed those
board
members who had called and were
unable to attend. He also made a correction
in the November meeting minutes stating
Joanne Sneer's absence was an excused one.
Gifts
of appreciation were presented to
four retiring board members, Jeanette Buchanan,
Shirley Nowak, Stan Jacobson, and
John Langan.
A motion was passed to approve the November 12 minutes (Buchanan /Mossberg).
A motion was passed for the acceptance of the November finan:ial report (Conradi/
LaCombe). ,
The report of the director was given by B. Sundberg and R. Emery gave a president's
report explaining some of the library's important services. He also explained that
no secret ballots are to be cast at open meetings and that two proposals will be
voted upon again tonight, both of which had previously been voted on by secret
ballots last month.
Two visiting librarians from Big Stone County were introduced. They were Barb Hauer,
Ortonville, and Ann Lauer, Graceville. Each responded briefly.
K. Matson reported monthly statistics and passed around clippings. More statistical
information will be available in January showing library use for all of 1990.
K. Matson also reported the staff Christmas party had recently been held in Kerkhoven
and that she had also participated in and attended a staff training meeting on
customer service. Three staff workshops are planned for 1991.
A letter has been prepared to be sent to Natalie Quinn, who plans to retire in
January. A motion was passed instructing the president to sign this (Buchanan/
Conradi).
A motion was passed to approve the bills (LaCombe /Dahlager).
Bill Pollard, SAMMIE Director, was present and gave the SAMMIE update.
The Ad Hoc Agreement study Committee report was given by Mr. Turck. Voting on
proposals from the Committee will be done by roll call under old business.
A memo was read by David Lauritsen representing the roundtable and staff organiza-
tion expressing appreciation for the pay increases for 1991.
A proposal from Meeker County was read by R. Emery. A motion was passed to table
this until later under new business (Matheson /Schulstad).
K. Matson presented the MLA Legislative Platform and other proposals regarding
state aid.
Howard Christiansen reported a replacement is being secured for Dean Aarvig who
recently resigned from the board.
A letter from the Bird Island City Council and also a letter of response was read
by President R. Emery.
A drawing was held for a turkey. Board members who had talked to their governing
units about the proposals to be voted upon had chances and the winner was Delores
Brunner.
The board took a fiv'minute break.
Mr. Turck and Mr. Phifer again explained the Ad Hoc Committee proposals. A motion
was passed to bring the Meeker County Proposal off the table (Christiansen /Jacobson).
John Miller explained it and discussion followed. A motion was passed to allow the
Meeker County proposal to be voted upon (Miller /Schoener). Coins were tossed to
determine the order of the proposal voting. All three proposals failed to achieve
a 758 majority approval. Proposal t3: that each county have two representatives
each making a total of 18 board members (8 yes, 22 no). Proposal il: that each
governing jurisdiction have one member but that each member's vote value correspond
to present number of board members from that jurisdiction, i.E., 26 members with
a total vote value of 44,(11 yes, 19 no). Proposal i2: that each governing juris-
diction have one member and that each member would have one vote, 26 members
(21 yes, 9 no).
A motion was passed to table the issue of a change in funding formula to an equal
per capita until more information comes from the state (Turck /Brunner).
-3-
A motion was passed to change the maximum number of terms a board member can
. -- serve from two to three (Nevins /Matheson).
A motion was passed to approve the Personnel Committee's recommendation regarding
staff attendance at Pioneerland Board meetings. A copy of the policy is attached
to the original minutes and will be added to the PLS Personnel Rules and Policies.
A motion was passed that the matter of the Automation Project be brought off the
table (Schulstad /Matheson). An explanation was given by B. Sundberg. Discussion
and input followed. R. Emery recommended a committee be appointed and asked for
volunteers. A motion was passed directing that this committee be formed (Kreie/
Brunner).
A motion was passed for the renewal of the Automation Fund C.D. (57,937) at First
I;ational of Glencoe (Jacobson /Bohm).
A motion was passed to engage the firm of Westberg 5 Eischens to audit the 1990
PLS financial records (Chri:;tiansen /Dahlager).
The full board will meet January 14 for the annual meeting.
Mileage vouchers were completed and the meeting was adjourned at 9 :35 p.m.
Lorna Carlson
Secretary
0
Nt /D7ANNE
12/19/40
- 10:f2343 OI FUNL
I Q
•
t
•
i�
1
Q
•I I
PIONE*Kt 4MO LIBRARY STSTLR LDOIIIY )4 Ll1,.5ULH I77U
INTEGRATED FINANCIAL SYSTEM IFS161 PAGE 1
EXPENDITURE GUIDELINE AS OF 12/90 EVO: 12/19/90 9:15:46
PERCENT OF YEAR 1001
_.._ _CURREMT_-_ _ __ ACTUAL 1CTUAL __ _ 604T - ACT.__-
4UDGET THIS -MONTH YEAR -TD -DATE DIFFERENCE FCE
• 100 PElSOMAL SERVICES
120,000.00
13,105.36
107,4E1.57
6105 SALARIES AND WAGES
T9S,OOO.D0
66,902 92
612,75).72
6110_IIEf.l T3LI MSURAMLE ______. _
_ _. 21,000.00
1,773.99
20,963.64
6120 HEALTH INSURANCE - DEDUCTIBLE
3,600.00
26.60
3,730.15
6133 RETIREMENT INSURANCE
80,72,.00
6,728.08
/6,7d6.4s
.t__.. )OTAL__.PERS0HAL _ SERVICES__
900,314.00
77,430.79
914,255.96
6205 BOOKS - ADULT
120,000.00
13,105.36
107,4E1.57
ZE BOOKS -
36,000.00
1,642.36
36,656.53
___ 6215 5 6E REFERENCE
AEFf
26,000.00
3,652.52
21,526.60
6220 PERIODICALS
26050.00
683.60
31. +26.89
6225 PAMPHLETS
300.00
.00
13.36
6226 __OLSYIA. LIBRARY ATEIALS- ___..
2,000.00
.00
.00
6230 CENSDN LINT MATERIALS
1.516.00
121.24
3,605.19
COUNTY 6235 LHIPPEVA COUNIY IIaR ARY MATERIALS
19.255.00
730.61
13,245.08
- -_6240 _. EIOEII_ItAI FRIARS ._ __ _ . _
15,141.OV
_ 1,641.91
11,107.39
M
6255 VIDE FILES
16A F
4,000.DD
.00
1.400.00
6250 VIDED TAPES
5,000. DO
1.398.63
6,401.16
6260
6260 SLIDES A40
AND FILM STRIPS
550.00
.00
.00
6265 MICaFDRRS
300.00
295.00
1,199.95
6 210 ____.- _...
1.000.00 _.
.00
555.21
• TO TAI M ATERIaIZ
241,932.00
25.961.06
245.205.19
• 1I0 UTALOG(NG
6310 OCLC AND OTHER CHARGES
16,608.00
.00
16,501.47
6120 _LO`LYEVJ D3_ CHARLES - _ _ _
24,000.00
768.59
25,791.00
• TOTAL CATALOGING
40,609.00
766.59
42.595.47
• 630 VEHICLES
6350 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
14.600.00
2.145.54
15,406.02
___6350_1NSUAANCE _. _ __ _
3,415.00
.00
2.550.62
6373 AMORTIZATION
9,000.00
.00
.00
• TOTAL VEHICLES
26.015.00
2,145.54
17.954.64
• ND CJRMUNICAT ION
6430 -SF RM IN AL EJ E_ CHARLES_
6420 TERMINAL MAINTENAN
6610 POSTAGE 4340 SHIPPING
L- i071L_20NNUtlILAI204
/-- 130._RQUIPMEbi_
6455 NEW EQUIPMENT
6460- A/Y_EQJIPMEYT_
4470 MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS
• TOTAL EQUIPMENT
9,000.00 _ __ _ . 1.009.63 10.765.42
1,000.00 .00 565.00
12,315.00 944.25 10,720.97
22.715.00 ___- ._.1.934.08 _. _.0 OSL79
• 160 OTHEA
• 505_SUSIOa"A UPPLIES. A.ND_EOAIPAENI._
6510 SJPPLIES AND PRIHIING
L� 1315 ORONOT I ON AL AMD PAOGRAMA(N6
lS>n 31LE 4M0 IJLTIMII -TAE .
6525 MILEAGE AND MEETINGS - TRUSTEES
_q 6530 PROF. RE98EASAIPS (TRUSTEES)
6535 [9SJRANCE
6510 ADS 1ND LEGAL NOTICES
6545 AUDITING
..�� 6556 A E
SCHOLARSHIP ' � R 6550 SCHOLA95 RSHI NIP FUMO
__6560_EATE4SIJN CONTRACTS
.cw • TOTAL OTHER -- -- -
-
` -` 6613 GLEMCOE FRIENDS. 19d1
` 6620.
6630 LOCAL EQUIP -.ENT
6650 STATE SALES TAI
F' b "O FARILL1IESEU90
6670 LARGF PRINT FUND
°. 6580 SURMEN READING
" • _IDIAL- SPECIAL
,' . -J•--_ TOTAL LIBRARY
a `1
Of fIMAL.. TOTALS_ 50 ACCOUNTS _
y BALANCE LEFT ON HAND
2.655.00
.00
1,000.00
96.42
15,000.00
1.791.35
16,655.00
1.893.77
1,500.00
645.36
27,493.00
1,656.67
1.000.00
.00
..__ 6,000.00
..1.445.50
5,000.00
591.86
400.00
497.91
11,500.00
.00
100.00
.00
1,500.00
.00
3.000.D0
225.00
$00.00
.00
I,DUO.DO
.00
10.500.00
.00
68,494.00
5.064.30
1,390.00
2,717.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
.5,042.00.___
1,999.00
7,C60.00
17,228.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
401.00
501.00
1,361,911.00
1.141,911.00
114,619.11
114.619.11
$136.564.95
1.664.06
507.15
Z5,300.10
27,531.31
5.741.99
z9, 665.
1.012.02
8.626.06
5.693.89
785.91
11.053.00
25.00
1.500.00
2.700.00
1,120.71
185.52
a, 520.00
91.947.36
.00
$0.00
S,312.S4
2,]44.6
3.643.76
],217. 2v
],
14.431.02
1,177,061.66
1.157.063.86
6136.564.95
1S,TS5.]Z- 102
16.36 100
I)J.65- 104
1,935.55 96
13,931.96- 102
1 2,472.43 - - aD -- -��--
2,651. >1- LOT
LTz
9,216.69- 166
266.24 5
2.000.00 0
226.19- 114
5.009.92 74
1.133.61 86
2.200.00 AS
1.401.76- 126
1.061.22- 365
250.00 0
698.95- 400
551.79 45
'2.666.61 99
L95.47- 101
1.191.00- 107
1.966.47- LDS
806.02- 106
464.36 15
e, 000.4, o
6,054.]6 69
1.765.42- 620
433.00 S2
1.993.03 91
443.21 fi
970.94 63
02.85 51
10.340.10- 169
4.674.31- 648
4,24 -1.99- 383
2,190.38- 106
11.02- lot
2,626.06 -. 145
6 111
385.91- 196
446.00 96
77.00 21
.40 100
300.00 90
620.31- 220
615.48 If
5,680.00 36
1,453.48- 105
1,393.00 0
2.667.JD 2
3,312.54- 266
25L.64 87
1.398.22 71
218.29- 111
389.25- 119
1,786.98 90
15,092.86- 101
15,092.06- 101
Pn
O�
Mt /UTANNF
lh4 /9l
9: 1 S: 09 Ol FUND
ALANCE LEFT ON HAND
J10 OLCEIPT
5101 RASIC SIAIF /FLOERAL 410
Silo -- RIG STnNF COUNTY
5 115 CHTVPLNA CluNfY
5I2U KAVJIfnHI CUUNTY
512-' LAC OUI P.RLF COUNTY
5125 VC LFUD CJUNTY
5110 4E ° 6FA COUNTY
SLIJ -- R4VVILL• LOUNTY. _.
5 115 S 41FT CJUNTY
SI37 YCLLOM MCUILINF CJUNTY
- 5i4O A✓PLEION
5145 9ENSON
5140 FAIRFAX
-3150_ SLENCJ F.
5155 GRACCVILLE
5157 G{A.41TE FALLS
- - -. S11J - HUTLHINSDN
5161 KERKHJVLN
5 1 7 0 LITCHFILLU
_. __5172- -OLTVTA
5175 nKTJNVILLC
S19U NILLMAR
OIAU 1S4AN0
5190 nAMSON
5195 HLCTOR
- S2i0.-- MAOISU.V
5200 RLNViLLE
5410 CASH A'_CFI•TS F. SAL2S TAY
__%.2a _.. GIF :5
S4)0 INTERLSI
TOTAL RECEIPTS
SCRIPTIUN__ _..__ _. _ _. _. .._.____
BUOGET
[� 660 FINAL TOTALS
1, 390.OU
2, 71 7.0V
2.000.OJ
5,042.OU
1,999.00
2.000.00
2,000.00
17,2za oo
41 ACCOUNTS
O iA TOTAL AND DALANCE ON NAND
.OUNfY 14 DECEMBhF 1990
1v6163 OAS[ l
AS OF 12190 FOO: I /Od /91 V:)0:5) L
. -. - ACTUAL__ ._.___ -- ACTUAL
THIS -MONTH YEAR -TO -GATE
$245,245.90 $143,296.48
PERCENT OF YEAR IUD(
AOGT-.. A! T
DIFFERENCE PCT
.00
190,469.00
5910
5970
i76--
GLENCOE FUND
RCNL
10[.44•- i0LL1RNiNL t__Yl ""LAN,
._ 22.088- 97_.-
a
5910
FAMILY TIES FUND
CJ
.00
5940
LARGE PRINT FUND
.00
SD,455.OJ
SOS
" "S -IAx
12.237.01
.:`0 100
5960
SUMNER READING
.00 100
9
TOTAL
OTHER FUNDS
O
' ••
TOTAL
LIBRARY
[� 660 FINAL TOTALS
1, 390.OU
2, 71 7.0V
2.000.OJ
5,042.OU
1,999.00
2.000.00
2,000.00
17,2za oo
41 ACCOUNTS
O iA TOTAL AND DALANCE ON NAND
.OUNfY 14 DECEMBhF 1990
1v6163 OAS[ l
AS OF 12190 FOO: I /Od /91 V:)0:5) L
. -. - ACTUAL__ ._.___ -- ACTUAL
THIS -MONTH YEAR -TO -GATE
$245,245.90 $143,296.48
PERCENT OF YEAR IUD(
AOGT-.. A! T
DIFFERENCE PCT
.00
190,469.00
59. 469. J0- Ltd
_ .00
._ 22.088- 97_.-
_.__ -- _..03___100-
.00
74,322.01
.u0 LOU
.00
110,754.1U
1,700.•0 98
.00
SD,455.OJ
- - - - - -- - - .o0 l0U
.00
12.237.01
.:`0 100
.00
68,264.00
.00 100
_- -00
.__. 29,142.00_____..
- 24,194- 00____S1-
.00
14,
.d0 LOJ
.00
25,1U4.OU
9,601.Y0 72
.00
... 9,3U5.00 -
-__. __.... -.(0 ._..10U
.00
IH.609.00
.1.0 100
.UO
4,427.00
4.417.00- 0
26, 425.00
-.-C 0__10
.UO
1,875.00
.LO too
.00
21,195.00
.00 100
.00 _.
- -_ S7.6Y6.O0
-.___ .. . ._._._ -CO -_ -_100_
.00
1,948.00
.CU IOU
.00
41,852.00
.b " 100
-00
-- 19,9t2.00.___
- -_, .- [9___10x_
.00
12,764.00
.0 100
.00
92,050.00
.:0 too
UO ._.
.. 8
.00
12,642.00
.':o loo
.00
7,747.00
.r3 100
1 4,365 -)0.
')._ .nn
.UO
9,961.00
.00 a00
' 4.117.01
48,175.76
104
.UO
4.289.OU _.
_.__ _.. S, LB9.e0- __4 29-
726.78
7,177.17
322.x) 96
5,043.79
1.283.058.40
31,234.':)- 102
PIUVCFKLAVO LTDPARY SYSTEM
INILGRAIEU FINANCIAL SYSTEM
REVENUE GUIDELINE
U7U RLIMnUSLMLNTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT)
- .OJ -
1, 390.CJ
U -
.00
--- SS)1 -R4 WRJ R.EMFNTS C41PPEQA COUNTY _. __
_._42,028- OQ
7)
.00
.00
5825 REIMAURSFMENTS - JLIVIA (MATERIALS ONLY)
2,000.OU
.00
2.000.00
5, U42.UJ
5430 REIMRURSEMFNTS - BFNSUN (MATERIALS ONLY)
1,576.00
.00
1,500.00
76.00
RFIN0. -�. CMIPOkNA COUNTY (NAET:RIALS ONLY)_
.GO
C,OOO.Uo
0
25S -AO
5U50 REIMS - MJNTEVIJFJ (MATERIALS OILY)
/S.lul.OU
.00
11,505.00
1.596.30
TOTAL REINRUSEMENIS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT)
69,960.00
.00
57.033.00
12,927.
• 03U OTVLR RLIMBURS °MFNTS
-Sd7Y O1MF4 R4IMRURS --2 ,02 -P ) i 5
• TOTAL OTHER REINRURSEMENTS 2.956.00 894.37 6,660.93 3.70Z.`3- 225
.00
- .OJ -
1, 390.CJ
U -
.00
1,980.00
717.00
7)
.00
.00
2, Do).C. )
U -
.VO
.00
5, U42.UJ
U
.UO
.DO
1,99Y.J)
U
.UO
.GO
C,OOO.Uo
0
.00
7,6UO.OU
400.00
71
.00
3,580.00
13.6".0)
21
5,918.16 1,150.112.3) 8,162.11- 101
1.341.970.00 5.918.16 1.150,132.13 8.361.11- lot
$151,184.06 $1,493,628.81
1,341.970.00
131 ,000.00
21,oU9.0U -
74,)2'.OJ
112,454. 10
30,455.OJ ..
7.',237.OU
64,2u4.00
. a5,1A4.0U -
34, 560.OU
34, 511.OU
. 9,305.OJ
10,609.00
.OU
-46,&d5.00 --
1,415.OU
21, 395. no
i7,6Y6.00 - --
1,9dR.0U
41. A52.OU
19,927.00 -
12,
v2.060.OU
O,OS4.OJ..
12.642.00
7, 747.90
9, 901.DO
46, SU 9. 00
.. I,DUO.oU
7,SOO.UU
1.251,824.00
100
95
76
OZ
Hutchinson Safety Council FO YOUR INrrOR&IATI,, ^1
Minutes
. The Hutchinson safety Council met Novembet 26, 1990 at 12:00 noon at
the Heitage Center.
There were 11 members present.
The minutes were approved as mailed.
Old Business
1. Nominations and Election of Officers was held.
Pre.cidrnfc
Joyce Rex nominated George Field for President there being no other
nominations, Marlin Torgerson moved to close the nominations with
the Secretary casting a unanimous ballot.
Vic - President:
George Field nominated Jim Haasl as Vice - President.
Dick Higgins moved to close the nominations and cast a unanimous
ballot for Jim Haasl.
Secretary /Treasurer
Joyce Rix nominated Jean Ward for Secretary /Treasurer.
Marlin Torgerson moved to close the nominations and cast a unanimous
ballot for Jean Ward.
2. Skateboards and Rollerblad Safety
Safety literature received from the Minnesota Safety Council was
given to Randy Exstad to distribute at school. If Safety Council
members wish to order any safety information directly from the
Consumer Product Safety Commission the number is 1 -800- 638 -8326.
3. Road Construction is now completed.
Sew Business
John Rodeberg stated that a speed study is being conducted by the
State regarding the area of Jefferson - Oakland and Fair Avenue -
Highw;;y 15 S. It was also mentioned that the speed limit sign
on Highway 15 N. needs additional work.
The 4 way �, p installed at 2nd Avenue and Adams Street has been very
effective u:. has received many positive comments.
•
The December meeting has been canc- The next meeting will by
January 28, 1991.
Jim Haasl will be presenting the program an the new "Headlight Law"
which was effective as of August 1990.
There being no further Business, the meeting was adjourned.
Submitted by: Jean Ward, Secretary /treasurer.
uci %y
U',.i1� -.,t"I
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT .
OFFICER'S MEETING
Monday, January 14, 1991
Gary reported that the SCBA's should be handled carefully and any
problems should be reported promptly.
Jim reported truck committee is working hard, details will be coming.
Jeff reported he is taking the ladder out of 235, it will remain in the
station.
Respectfully submitted by,
Bob Schantzen
Secretary
1
HUTCHINSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
Monday, December 3, 1990
The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m.
The minutes of Novbemer meeting were read and approved.
Election of officers for the fire department were held and elected as
follows:
Chief
Ist Asst Chief
2nd Asst. Chief
City Capt.
Ladder Capt.
Rural Capt.
Rescue Capt.
City Lt
Ladder Lt.
Rural Lt.
Rescue Lt.
Secretary
Treasurer
Brad Emans
Randy Redman
Steve Schramm
Jim Popp
Gary Forcier
Craig Reiner
John Reynolds
Bob Vleyra
Joe Drahos
Tom Pessek
Jeff Dobratz
Bob Schantzen
Gary Henke
Randy reported on the dance It will be January 19, 1991, at Lake Marion
Ballroom.
Jim Popp reported on Rural pumper committee.
Gary Henke and Steve Schramm will work with Ken Merrill on getting a
new copy machine.
0
0
The Bills and Runs were read and approved as follows:
F-UM
CITY
Sid's Foods
2.83
Hutch Sports
9.15
Clarey's
25.90
Steve Schramm
7.18
Allen Office
9.65
Brinkman
13.28
Coast to Coast
3.03
Allen Office
4.50
Christensen Repair
1.00
7 West Stop
22.26
Heger Jewelry
27.00
Coast to Coast
10.68
Coast to Coast
2.07
Coast. to Coast
2.69
Clarey's
108.00
Randy Redman
443.49
Steve Schramm
337.76
Brad Emans
432.40
L &P Supply
.55
Allen Office
3.69
Electro Watchman
144.00
Coast to Coast
5.40
Coast to Coast
2.30
Coast. to Coast
1.49
Fitzloff
3.99
Fitzloff
56.25
TwowayComm
189.70
Brinkman
19.92
Ink Spots
45.37
Hutch Iron
7.75
Hutch Wholesale
4.25
Hutch Wholesale
102.64
Hutch Wholesale
6.45
Fire Engineering
21.95
Phillips 66
30,54.
Zee Medical
159.95
Tom Thumb
28.70
Hutch Fire & Safe
8.40
Hutch Fire & Safe
4.50
Hutch Fire & Safe
62.80
Two Way Comm
30.00
Reinetz
413.35
rw. i r)...4 . 7 nn
r
L.
I-
L-1
Big Beer 5.37
L &P Supply 52.95
Forbes Auto 19.47
TOTAL $ 2897.60
RURAL
Brad Emans
11.75
Steve Schramm
8.50
Randy Redman
92.50
Jim Brodd
2175
John Reynolds
16.00
Bruce Precht
16.50
Ed Homan
15.75
Orlin Henke
7.25
Hutch Wholesale
21.13
Hutch Wholesale
.98
Hutch Wholesale
( 6.61)
Tom Pessek
73.80
L &P Supply
4.30
• Zee Medical
371.00
TOTAL
$716.69
GENERAL
US Postmaster
25.00
Pizza Hut
48.72
South Haven FD
8.00
Oary Henke
200.00
Sid's Foods
4.14
Coast to Coast
4.33
coast to Coast
20.41
Hutch Wholesale
30.00
Rexall Drug
1.35
Browns Floral
35.00
KDUZ
192.75
Hutch Leader
335.40
Bill Arndt
332.00
Simonson
50.58
Ink Spots
149.35
George Field
9.54
Northland Bev
25.50
• Ink Spots
701.20
Hager Jewelry
34.92
Hutch Tele Co
363.75
KKJR 192.75
TOTAL 3,655.79
..
1 1 -2
Schrupp
11-16
Learning Hutch
1 1 -3
Buss
11-19
PD Standby
11-3
PD Complaint
11-19
Hwy 7 W
11-3
Albrecht
11-20
3M
11-4
3M
11-20
Nghia
11 -6
J's Pizza
I1 -23
3M
11-8
Happy Chef
11-24
Cty 14
11-10
Massmann
11-25
Hwy 7 W
11 -10
Plowman
11 -26
Ashwill
I1-11
Jackson
I1 -28
3M
11-13
Magdanz
New applicants
were read Kelly Goranson and
Casey Stotts.
The meeting was adjourned.
Subm i tted by
Jamie Emans
Secretary
0
0
0
• � Ct u . 1��7
MINUTES `
MCLEOD REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY
JANUARY 17, 1991
Members Present Others Present p 1n� i�Ir'�
Sheldon Nies, Chairman Robin Schoen, Leader FOR YOUR :il O ,A T i` �j
Tow Daggett Barry Anderson, Attorney
Larry Graf Elli Mills, Dakota Rail
Dean Oleson Kimberly Hughes, Dakota Rail
Milo Kubasch Jack McManus, Dakota Rail
Joe Gehlen
Members Absent
Les Forman
Chairman Sheldon Nies opened the meeting at 11:30 a.m. at the Victorian Inn,
Hutchinson.
Jack McManus, the newly named general manager of Dakota Rail, was introduced.
Elli Hills provided an update on rail activities.
Pic Industries, Silver lake (50 cars shipped). They constructed a
temporary shed which inadvertently infringed 20 feet on the required
setback. The county has granted permission to allow it to remain in
place until spring, when it will be moved to comply with county zoning. er
is Dakota Rail has given a caboose car to the City of Hutchinson. The car'
is to be repainted and a new logo placed on it. A rail trestle is also
being given to the city, subject to an agreement being drawn up by
Attorney Anderson.
Rail operations since March 15, 1990, at which time the present
management took over the railroad, have shown 562 cars loaded, a 26%
increase over the similar period a year ago. Total cars for the year in
1989 were 619; in 1990, 710. The 3 top customers in 1990 were 3M C.o.,
Butler Manufacturing, and Pic Industries. Hutch Scrap Metal, Pure
Culture Products, and Norwesco are among other large u =ers.
Farmers Elevator in Hutchinson has done a little shipping.
There has been no employee turnover with the exception of Michael Ross.
Two new employees have been added, for a total of 7.
Rail rehab was begun at the end of September and continued until the end
of December. 3500 ties were added, plus 2500 feet of rail and b carloads
of ballast. In 1991 there will be 17,500 feet of (90 pound) rail, 9000
ties and 240 carloads of ballast. The whole line will be surfaced and
some bridge work done. Work should be complete in November 1991 to Class
1 specifications over the entire line.
The dinner train is being marketed for sale.
Real estate is being sold as appropriate and new leases worked out. All
the bankruptcy debts are paid, with the exception of $46,000 still owed
to 3M and Butler. Property was sold to the Lafeyette Country Club for
$312,000. Sale is being negotiated of Mound properties to the City of
Mount; however, some of this property is held in a mortgage by the State
and the sale will be held up while MN /DOT and the Attorney General
review its status. When this sale can be completed, the final amount owed
to 3M and Butler will be paid. Property negotiations in Minnetonka Beach
and St. Bonifacius are difficult. Hutchinson property is leased at
S.10 /sq.ft. per year, with varying rates in other locations.
New rail traffic is being sought, with a possible increase from 3M Co.,
Norwesco and others. A seminar will be presented on bringing in lumber
which may be of interest to some potential shippers. The owners feel
this has been a good 3/4 year.
At the completion of the report, the meeting was adjourned at 12:45 p.m.
Recorded by Hazel Sitz
is
