Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp03-26-1991 cf � t
Cti Y
C t r'l
Z— —, b� .J1
n _ March 30
sfv"lD Y
-27-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meet
at City Hall
5:00 P.M. - Park & Recreatio
Board Meeting
at Library
Conference Room
-
PALL MONDAY
6:00 P.M. — City Council
Workshop with
Directors Re.
Annual reports
7:30 P.M. — City Council
Meeting at City
Hall
THURSDAY
-28-
n � - Nursing Home Board
Meeting at Burns
Manor
... J ✓..
25-
Noon - Safety Council
Meeting at Heritage
Center
1:00 P.M. — Utilities Cormiss
Meeting at Utilit
F RIDAY .ss -i T tJ Y
—29— —30—
GOOD FRIDAY FIRST DAY OF PASSOVER
�a
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 26, 1991
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Sherman Buschow, Assembly of God Church
3. Consideration of Minutes - Regular Meeting of March 12, 1991;
Bid Openings of March 11 & March 19, 1991; Special Meeting of
March 19, 1991
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - February 1991
2. Planning Commission Minutes of February 19, 1991
(b) Gambling License for Minnesota Deer Hunters Association
Raffle
(c) Intoxicating Liquor Licenses:
1.
The Underground
2.
Victorian Inn
3.
The Coach
4.
The Gold Coin
5.
O'Toole's
(d) Requests for Reduced Refuse Rate
(e) Appointment of Jim Mills to Nursing Home Board (7 -1 -91)
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed,
issue licenses, approve reduced rate and ratify
appointment
5. Public Hearing
None.
1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 26, 1991
6.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
Communications Requests And Petitions
(a) Consideration of Request to Use Library Square On
April 7, 1991 for Patriotic Program
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) Consideration of Request for Marion Graham to Attend
Lab Training School In Eau Claire, Wisconsin
(c) Discussion of Lodging Tax By Bob Mlynar
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first
reading of ordinance and set second reading April 9
7.
Resolutions And Ordinances
•
(a) Resolution No. 9457 - Resolution For Purchase
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Subdivision Agreement for Wal -Mart
(DEFERRED FEBRUARY 12, 1991)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment
period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Hanging Special Spring Flags Along
Main Street
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) Consideration of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Fee
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
•
2
0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 26, 1991
(d) Consideration of Advertising for Bids for New Entrance
At Civic Arena
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration of Application for Solicitors License By
Midwest City Directory
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue
license
(f) Consideration of Approval of Airport Consultant
Selection Finalist
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(g) Consideration of Supplemental Agreement for Juul
Contracting On T.H. 7 East for Letting No. 3 (1990)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreement
(h) Discussion of Main Street (T.H. 15) Striping Proposal
By MN /DOT Traffic Engineer Keith Voss
Action -
(i) Consideration of Ordering Plans And Specifications And
Advertising for Bids On Letting No. 1, Project No.
91 -01; Letting No. 2, Project No. 91 -02; And Letting
No. 6, Projects 91 -10 & 91 -12
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
advertise for bids - Motion to waive reading and adopt
Resolutions No. 9445, No. 9446 & No. 9447
(j) Consideration of Awarding Bid for Letting No. 8,
Project No. 91 -15 (1991 Asphalt Pavement Crack Sealing)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into contract - Motion to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 9448
fl
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 26, 1991
(k) Consideration of Preliminary Plat of North Oak Ridge
Submitted By Kevin Compton with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(1) Consideration of Variance Requested By Marvin Willhite
with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9449
(m) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of School
District Plat Submitted By Hutchinson School District
with Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9450
(n) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Hutchinson School District In Wager Development Corp.
Plat with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9451
(o) Consideration of Request By Hutchinson Technology Inc.
to Rezone from R -2 To I -1 with Favorable Recommendation
of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive first reading of ordinance and set second
reading for April 9, 1991
(p) Consideration of Variance Requested By 3M Company with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9452
(q) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By 3M
Company with Favorable Recommendtion of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9453 •
4
. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 26, 1991
(r) Considertaion of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg. & Sales Inc., with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9454
(s) Consideration of Variance Requested By Bruce Rannow
with No Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9455
(t) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of Howard's
Addition Submitted By Ward Haugen with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9456
• (u) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By Pete Kasal
(Two Mile Radius - Lynn Township)
Action - Refer to County with no objection
(v) Consideration of Proposed Cuts for 1991 City Budget
Action -
(w) Consideration of Hospital Board Recommendation to
Approve Purchase of Cat Scan Equipment
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(x) Consideration of Retainage Agreement with General
Contractor for Hutchinson Community Hospital
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreement
(y) Consideration of Supplemental Agreement No. 1 for
Diamond 5 Wrecking, Inc. On Letting No. 1, Downtown
Shopko Development Site, Phase I
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
• into agreement
5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MARCH 26, 1991
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. Adjournment
•
N
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MARCH 12, 1991
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen
Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson.
Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer
John Rodeberg and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Harry Kelm.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of February 26, 1991 were
approved as distributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND
• 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - FEBRUARY 1991
2. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF JANUARY 30, 1991
3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 21, 1991
4. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF JANUARY 16, 1991
5. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 25, 1991
6. NURSING HOME BOARD MINUTES OF JANUARY 24, 1991 AND
JANUARY 31, 1991
(b) GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 40 & 8 VOITURE 414 AT AMERICAN
LEGION
(c) POPCORN AND CONCESSION STAND PERMIT FOR MARK MCGRAW
(DEFERRED JANUARY 22, 1991)
(d) APPOINTMENTS
1. DIANE GILMER - HOSPITAL BOARD
2. CLINT GRUETT - PLANNING COMMISSION
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
is Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to order report
and minutes filed, issue license and permit, and ratify
the appointments.
94
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 0
5. PUBLIC HEARING
(a) 8:00 P.M. - MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:00 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4201.
1. PROJECT NO. 90 -11B - WAGNER DEVELOPMENT CORP. PLAT
No one was present to be heard.
2. PROJECT NO. 90 -16B - T.H. 7 EAST
Engineer Rodeberg reported that the Myron Ziemer
property was to be removed from the improvement list.
No one was present to be heard.
3. ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 35 - ACTIVATING DEFERRED
ASSESSMENT
No one was present to be heard.
4. PROJECT NO. 90 -26 - KEITH STREET, SOUTHWEST SANITARY
SEWER AND WATERMAIN SERVICES
No one was present to be heard.
5. PROJECT NO. 90 -15B - T.H. 15 NORTH
No one was present to be heard.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to close
the hearing at 8:10 P.M.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to ap-
prove the projects and waive reading and adopt Reso-
lution No. 9440.
(b) 8:15 P.M. - ASSESSMENT ROLLS
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:15 P.M.
and read Publication No. 4202.
LJ
2
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991
1. ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 264
PROJECT NO. 90 -11B - No one was present to be heard.
PROJECT NO. 90 -16B - No one was present to be heard.
PROJECT NO. 90 -26 - No one was present to be heard.
PROJECT 90 -15B - No one present to be heard.
2. ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 265
DEFERRED ASSESSMENT ROLL 35 - No one was present to
be heard.
Engineer Rodeberg reported that on Assessment Roll
No. 264, the property of Myron & Viola Ziemer was to
be removed and $810.70 deducted, for a new total of
$9,180.60. Also, there were two corrections on Roll
No. 264, Project No. 90 -15B, to change Account No. 28
• to $2,300.38 and Account No. 30 to $3,451.10, for a
new total assessment of $26,361.89.
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to close
the hearing at 8:20 P.M.
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve and
adopt Assessment Rolls No. 264 and No. 265, to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9441 and No. 9442.
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO ATTEND TREE INSPECTORS
CERTIFICATION SEMINAR
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried
to approve the request.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 9435 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
• The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 0
Alderman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 9436 - RESOLUTION TO RENAME HELLANDS PARK
TO ROTARY PARK
The motion was made by Alderman Lenz, seconded by Alder-
man Torgerson and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 9437 - RESOLUTION TO RENAME BRIDGE PARK
WEST TO ODD FELLOWS PARK
The motion was made by Alderman Mlinar, seconded by Ald-
erman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading and
adopt.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 9438 - RESOLUTION TO RENAME OLD ROBERTS
PARK TO LIONS PARK
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by •
Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt.
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 9439 - RESOLUTION REQUESTING IMPROVEMENT
OF LANE MARKINGS ON MAIN STREET (TRUNK HIGHWAY 15)
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to waive reading
and adopt.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL LANGUAGE IN CAR IMPOUNDING
CONTRACT
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz, to approve and enter into contract.
Following discussion of the additional language in the
contract, Alderman Torgerson withdrew his motion and Ald-
erman Lenz withdrew his second to the motion.
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to defer until the
City Attorney can review for clarification. •
4
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991
After further discussion, the motion was made by Alder-
man Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the contract with the paragraph in
question deleted.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF 1988 STATE FIRE
CODE (DEFERRED OCTOBER 23, 1990)
The motion was made by Alderman Erickson, seconded by
Alderman Torgerson, to approve and adopt by reference, to
waive first reading of ordinance and set second reading
for March 26, 1991. Following discussion, Alderman
Erickson withdrew his motion, and Alderman Torgerson
withdrew his second to the motion.
Alderman Erickson moved to defer. Motion seconded by
Alderman Torgerson and unanimously carried.
9. NEW BUSINESS
• (a) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM TREE BOARD FOR
COMPOST SITE FEE SCHEDULE AND OPERATION
Forester Mark Schnobrich reported on the compost site
operation and the recommended fee schedule for commer-
cial haulers of $150 yearly fee and $25 per trip charge
for after hours.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Lenz, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried, to approve the recommendations.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF STEP 2 GRANT AMENDMENT FOR WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve the amendment.
(c) DISCUSSION OF CROW RIMER DAM IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE B, AND
DNR LETTER OF INTENT
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the dam improvements and
the recommendation from Barr Engineering Company.
• Following discussion, Alderman Mlinar moved to direct the
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991 •
information to DNR that budgetary considerations limited
the work that could be done on the Crow River dam. Mo-
tion seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimously car-
ried.
(d) DISCUSSION OF DOWNTOWN DEMOLITION CONTRACT
Engineer Rodeberg reported that Diamond 5 would be doing
the demolition on the Shopko project site, and there was
a potential issue regarding salvage rights. Since June
1, 1991 was the completion date for demolition, the City
would pay the additional insurance costs involved due to
the delay on the Rannow property because he may not be
out until June 21.
Attorney Anderson commented on a meeting he had with
Lloyd Allen regarding salvage rights from Allen's build-
ing.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSAL FOR ROOF REPAIR OF OLD FIRE •
STATION
Mr. Mike Maiers of Laraway Roof Systems presented two
proposals on roof repair at the old fire station. Two
written proposals were also submitted.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Erickson, seconded by Alderman Torgerson and unanimous-
ly carried, to refer the proposals to staff for a recom-
mendation.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF ABANDONMENT OF WATER WELLS AT SHOPKO
SITE
It was recommended to hire L.T.P. Enterprises to seal the
2 well on the Car Quest property for $200 and the 16"
well in the cold storage building, prior to demolition,
for $2,684.13, both within the Shopko site. The 12"
water well cannot be accessed until after demolition, and
a proposal will be presented later.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Mlinar, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to approve the L.T.P. Enterprises proposal.
1]
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991
(g) CONSIDERATION OF FLAGS ON MAIN STREET
This item was withdrawn from the agenda.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz stated that it had been determined
the temporary location of the liquor store in the vi-
cinity of a public school was within legal rights.
It was reported that the March of Dimes coordinator had
clarified the route for the 1991 WalkAmerica with Sgt.
Kirchoff, and he approved it.
The electrical needs for the temporary liquor store will
be presented at the next Council meeting. Quotes will be
obtained.
• Administrator Plotz mentioned another workshop would be
necessary to cover the remaining annual reports. It was
the consensus of the Council to meet at 6:00 P.M. prior
to the March 26, 1991 meeting.
Mr. Plotz mentioned the correspondence which was mailed
regarding Phase II and Phase III of the downtown develop-
ment.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN JOHN MLINAR
Alderman Mlinar commented on recent correspondence from
cable TV. During discussion, Attorney Anderson stated
the Cable TV Advisory Committee was dissatisfied with the
local cable TV operation and the level of service re-
ceived. There will be a formal recommendation coming to
the Council.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM ALDERMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Alderman Torgerson mentioned that Hotovec Auction Service
was going to hold an auction at the airport. He ques-
tioned whether any permission or permit was needed in
addition to approval from the Airport Commission to hold
the airplane auction at the airport.
•
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MARCH 12, 1991
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to approve an auction at the airport.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
Attorney Anderson commented on the memo and agreement
regarding Pick Industries. He stated Gopher Campfire had
been contacted, and they had no objection.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman
Torgerson, seconded by Alderman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve and enter into agreement.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF
Engineer Rodeberg commented on a meeting regarding set-
backs.
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS •
The motion was made by Alderman Torgerson, seconded by
Alderman Lenz and unanimously carried, to approve the
claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9:05
P.M.
8
MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 19, 1991
The special meeting was called to order by Mayor Ackland at 5:45
P.M. Present were: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Aldermen Craig Lenz and
Don Erickson. Also present: Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill
and Financial Advisor Bill Fahey of Ehlers & Associates.
Mr. Bill Fahey reported on the bids received this afternoon for the
$6,500,000 G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1991A and
the $495,000 G.O. Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds,
Series 1991B. He stated that two bonds would be awarded for sale,
and Norwest Investment Services, Inc. was the successful bidder for
both bonds.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Lenz, sec-
onded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve and
award the sale to Norwest Investment Services, Inc. and to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 9443.
. Mr. Fahey recommended that the City refund the bonds for the fire
hall, in the amount of $400,000, and the library, in the amount of
$600,000. The negotiated sale would be awarded to Norwest Invest-
ment Services, Inc.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Alderman Lenz, sec-
onded by Alderman Erickson and unanimously carried, to approve the
negotiated sale to Norwest Investment Services, Inc. and to waive
reading and adopt Resolution No. 9444.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:00 P.M.
L J
4
. MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, MARCH 11, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator
Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Engineer John Rodeberg, Street
Supervisor Larry Karg, and Administrative Secretary Marilyn
Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 4203, Advertisement for Bids, 1991
Asphalt Pavement Crack Sealing, Letting No. 8, Project No. 91 -15,
was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read:
Bargen, Inc.
Mountain Lake, MN
$16,272.00
Quality Seal, Inc.
New Hope, MN
18,716.64
Action Enterprises
Suamiko, WI
20,992.00
Bergmann Companies, Inc.
• Eau Claire, WI
17,104.00
Sioux Falls Surface Seal
Sioux Falls, S.D.
14,720.00
The bids were referred to the City Engineer for a recommendation to
the City Council on March 26, 1991.
The meeting adjourned at 2:05 P.M.
•
C�-
MINUTES •
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, MARCH 19, 1991
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at
2:30 P.M. Also present were Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill,
Financial Advisor Bill Fahey of Ehlers & Associates, and Adminis-
trative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The following bids were opened:
$6 G.O. MEDICAL FACILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1991A
IW11MST
RATE
Dain Bosworth, Inc. $9,444,179.69 7.3540
Norwest Investment Services, Inc. 9,169,373.80 7.14009
$495,000 G.O. MEDICAL FACILITIES REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS,
SERIES 1991B
FBS Investment Services, Inc. $ 118,265.00 6.0804 .
Norwest Investment Services, Inc. 115,150.00 5.9203
Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Inc. 118,540.00 6.0946
The bids were referred to Bill Fahey for review and recommendation
at a special City Council meeting today at 5:30 P.M.
The bid opening adjourned at 2:45 P.M.
•
7
FEBRUARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT -
1991
FEBRUARY
111JENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
128,235.37
MONTH -FEB,
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
TAXES
0.00
5,477.49
1,640,024.00
1,634,546.51
0.3%
LICENSES
755.00
986.00
18,845.00
17,859.00
5.2%
PERMITS AND FEES
1,063.37
3,041.31
93,300.00
90,258.69
3.3%
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
19,685.00
43,540.00
1,524,648.00
1,481,108.00
2.9%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
21,022.53
47,33858
622,414.00
575,075.32
7.6%
FINES & FORFEITS
0.00
0.00
50,400.00
50,400.00
0.0%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
7,795.61
12,743.48
246,678.00
233,934.52
5.2%
C'ONTRIBU'TIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
500.00
500.00
431,000.00
430,500.00
0.1%
PEVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
8.68
118.89
250.00
131.11
47.6%
TOTAL
50,830.19
113,745.85
4,627,559.00
4,513,813.15
2.5%
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
2,117.83
5,123.75
39,591.00
34,167.25
12.9%
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
12,515.56
33,873.63
162,109.00
128,235.37
20.9%
ELECTIONS
975.00
975.00
4,712.00
3,737.00
20.7%
FINANCE
28,909.68
55,514.64
243,163.00
187,648.36
22.8%
MOTOR VEHICLE
6,228.49
15,876.65
71,656.00
55,779.35
22.2%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
21,500.00
21,500.00
0.0%
K 1L
6,825.00
9,909.00
42,000.00
32,091.00
23.6%
NNING
56.73
208.33
7,100.00
6,891.67
2.9%
CITY HALL
3,467.09
8,450.72
42,721.00
34,270.28
19.8%
RECREATION BUILDING
2,715.24
6,646.48
60,887.00
54,240.52
10.9%
POLICE DEPALEMENT
77,759.09
198,554.69
952,329.00
753,774.31
20.8%
FIDE DEPARTMENT
4,096.49
15,360.70
125,245.00
109,884.30
12.3%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
2,458.70
6,103.07
29,997.00
23,893.93
20.3%
BUILDING INSPECTION
5,448.01
13,950.27
70,800.00
56,849.73
19.7%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
0.00
183.67
10,250.00
10,066.33
1.8%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.0%
FIRE MARSHALL
3,587.90
9,313.97
49,416.00
40,102.03
18.8%
ENGINEERING.
16,918.15
47,827.09
270,819.00
222,991.91
17.7%
STREETS & ALLEYS
27,668.77
63,260.59
428,010.00
364,749.41
14.8%
STFEET MAINTENANCE A/C
4,748.05
10,691.54
77,200.00
66,508.46
13.8%
LIBRARY
1,585.86
17,938.25
72,804.00
54,865.75
24.6%
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
5,317.35
11,421.43
90,060.00
78,638.57
12.7%
G`.WREC. ADMIN.
7,524.82
18,535.98
105,356.00
86,820.02
17.6%
RECREATION
5,776.94
13,639.84
152,294.00
138,654.16
9.0%
CIVIC ARENA
10,252.61
33,964.76
127,132.00
93,167.24
26.7%
P &K DEPARTMENT
25,221.64
65,902.59
451,598.00
385,695.41
14.6%
CE'ITTERY
4,317.20
7,829.29
56,787.00
48,957.71
13.8%
COVAU:ITY DEVELOPMENT
326.11
8,930.56
32,710.00
23,779.44
27.3%
D19T SERVICE
1,500.00
3,000.00
54,187.00
51,187.0)
5.5%
AiRFCRT
2,171.94
24,624.97
200,297.00
175,672.03
12.3%
TRANSIT
8,069.07
22,166.59
106,900.00
84,733.41
20.7%
_,i COUNCIL
0.00
3.07
7,600.00
7,596.93
0.0%
.D.P. COORDINATRO
3,954.04
24,082.65,
38,666.00
14,583.35
0.0%
UNALLOCATED
2,960.82
49,189.95
421,413.00
372,223.05
11.7%
TOTAL
285,504.18
803,053.72
4,627,559.00
3,824,505.28
17.4%
285,504.18
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEBRUARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FINANCIAL
REPORT -
1991
FEBRUARY
WATER SALES
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
531,800.00
457,838.00
13.9%
ISENUE.REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
RE USE SERVICES
MONTH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
LIQUOR SALES
31,569.37
64,659.45
435,000.00
370,340.55
14.9%
WISE SALES
8,219.59
15,641.37
151,000.00
135,358.63
10.4%
BEER SALES
44,460.09
88,238.77
701,400.00
613,161.23
12.6%
BEER DEPOSITS
14.48
(103.32)
0.00
103.32
2.4%
MISC. SALES
3,174.99
5,946.57
40,895.00
34,948.43
INTEREST
568.62
852.82
7,500.00
6,647.18
11.4%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.0%
CASH DISCOUNTS
(4.57)
(91.57)
(1,500.00)
(1,408.43)
14.5%
TOTAL
88,002.57
175,144.09
1,334,295.00
1,159,150.91
13.1%
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND,
PF.RSONEL SERVICES
9,737.87
24,568.82
128,181.00
103,612.18
19.2%
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
124.68
279.34
3,700.00
3,420.66
7.5%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1,689.42
1,810.70
59,350.00
57,539.30
3.1%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
290.00
8,600.00
8,310.00
3.4%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
0.00
500.00
500.00
0.0%
TRANSFERS
65,834.42
65,834.42
110,000.00
44,165.58
59.8%
T OF SALES
64,702.42
1,039,400.00
974,697.58
6.2%
ER
0.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
0.0%
TOTAL
77,386.39
157,485.70
1,354,731.00
1,197,245.30
11.6%
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
WATER SALES
37,577.65
73,962.00
531,800.00
457,838.00
13.9%
WATER METER SALES
15.00
1,257.00
8,000.00
6,743.00
15.7%
RE USE SERVICES
51,336.01
91,823.03
666,000.0 0
574,176.97
13.8%
REFUSE SURCHARGE
4,509.25
7,299.19
0.00
(7,299.19)
SEWER. SERVICES
109,284.99
219,746.01
1,504,000.00
1,284,253.99
14.6%
PEN. -';LTY CHARGES
1,353.46
2,716.93
15,000.00
12,283.07
0.0%
INTEREST EARNED
3,899.47
3,899.47
160,000.00
156,100.53
2.4%
S C 0 R E
18,211.50
18,211.50
0.00
(18,211.50)
REFtNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
510.50
685.55
3,000.00
2,314.45
0.0%
OTHER
20.00
20.00
2,000.00
1,980.00
1.0%
TOTAL
226,717.83
419,620.68
2,889,800.00
2,470,179.32
14.5%
E %PE ?SSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
O FUSE
56,738.99
117,017.45
687,850.00
570,832.55
17.0%
WA-
15,155.40
41,743.77
827,636.00
785,892.23
5.0%
SEWER
83,195.44
214,264.20
1,787,035.00
1,572,770.80
12.0%
WASTE TREAT ?TENT PLANT CONSTRUCT.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
TOTAL:
155,089.83
373,025.42
3,302,521.00
2,929,495.58
11.3%
w
YOUTHCTR
ATTENDANCE
Y.T.D
23 DATES 403 803
to
FEBRUARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
- 1991
FEBRUARY
YOURTH CENTER - "DRY
DOCK"
REVENUE REPORT
CURRENT
YEAR TO
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
MONTH -FEB.
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
MEMBERSHIPS
50.00
220.00
1,000.00
780.00
22.0%
ADMISSIONS
181.00
383.00
3,500.00
3,117.00
10.9%
0.00
800.00
800.00
0.0%
VIDEO GAMES
79.25
183.25
6,700.00
6,516.75
2.7%
FOP
224.15
340.15
0.00
(340.15)
ERR
CANDY
0.00
164.48
0.00
(164.48)
ERR
CHIPS, ETC.
0.00
1.59
500.00
498.11
0.3%
INTEREST
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
BLDG RENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
FUND RAISERS
CONTRIBUTIONS
7,750.00
7,750.00
53,656.00
45,906.00
14.4%
8,284.40
9,042.47
66,156.00
57,113.53
13.7%
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
PERSONEL SERVICES
2,008.14
4,983.89
24,359.00
19,375.11
20.5%
OPERATING SUPPLIES
273.36
597.04
4,500.00
3,902.96
13.3%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
2,458.38
7,391.26
36,300.00
28,908.74
20.4%
6.0%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
60.00
1,000.00
0.00
94C -.00
0.00
•
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
4,739.88
0.00
13,032.19
66,159.00
53,126.81
19.7%
TOTAL
YOUTHCTR
ATTENDANCE
Y.T.D
23 DATES 403 803
to
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COM14ISSION
Tuesday, February 19, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint
Gruett, Craig Lenz, E1Roy Dobratz, Tom Lyke, Dean Wood and Chairman
Bill Craig. Also Present: Building Official Jim Harka, City
Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney Barry Anderson.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Lenz made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Tuesday, January 15, 1991. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the
motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• NONE
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY GALEN HOUK, HWY
7 E, (2 MILE RADIUS)
Building Official Jim Marka commented on his
understanding of the proposal after speaking with Mr. Ed
Homan, County Zoning Administrator.
Mr. Galen Houk, owner of the property, explained the I -1
rezoning possibility as recommended by the County. The
property has been Commercial for many years.
The sketch plan shows the area as B -1 (Business
district). Mr. Houk stated the proposed use of Lot 1
will be used car lot. City Engineer Rodeberg commented
on the poor drainage. Mr. Houk explained that County
Ditch #18 behind the property takes care of the, drainage
problem.
There was discussion on Outlot A as being part of Lot 1
and not saleable separate from Lot 1.
• Mr. Houk commented on the county requirement would be
100' of Hwy frontage. He stated that he contacted the MN
DOT on access to the property. There can be no more
accesses added and what is there must stay as they are
"Grandfathered" in.
/; <�)
HUTCHINSON PLANNING C01414ISSION MINUTES
2/19/91
Mr. Houk also stated there should be an easement for
frontage road along the Hwy. but that the MN DOT will
govern access.
There is a new soil survey which is more accurate than
the survey in the packet.
Mr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the
sketch and directed staff to verify the proposed land use
as the County regards Industrial, and also obtaining an
easement for a frontage road. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the
motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY ARTHUR KROEGER
(2 MILE RADIUS) HUTCHINSON TWP
Building Official Marka commented on the sketch plan as
a residential lot.
Mrs. Kroeger stated the use would be for residential.
There was some discussion on staff recommendations.
Mr. Ebent moved to recommend approval to City Council,
seconded by Mr. Wood, the motion carried unanimously. •
(c) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING SUBMITTED BY JIM HEIKES, (2
MILE RADIUS) HASSAN VALLEY TWP
Mr. Jim Heikes stated the land use would be for auto
sales. Discussion followed on the zoning and permitted
land use.
Mr. Heikes commented on the access area being approved by
MN DOT and Ed Homan, County Zoning Administrator. The
Township has approved the access and it is an existing
approach.
Mr. Wood moved to recommend approval of the rezoning,
seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(d) DISCUSSION OF SKETCH PLAN OF WAGNER REPLAT REQUESTED BY
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Supt. Glenn Matejka commented on the property the school
district is proposing to purchase. Atty. Neil Jensen
commented on the storm sewer and sanitary sewer.
Building Official Marka commented on the present plat and
that the school district is required to replat to have a •
2
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION 14INUTUS
2/19/91
public hearing on the proposal. Also there is to be a
subdivision agreement on the plat at the time of the
final plat.
City Engineer John Rodeberg stated the park area will be
half the size of the present park. This will be more than
adequate. He also commented the park board approves the
relocation of the park. The consensus of the planning
commission was favorable.
(e) PRESENTATION OF COUNTY /CITY ADDRESSING SYSTEM BY DUANE
HOESCHEN
Building Official Marka commented on background of the
addressing system. Mr. Duane Hoeschen, County Emergency
Services Director, presented an overhead explaining the
system and the possibility of matching some addresses to
city street naming. He stated the Transportation Task
Force suggested the link from the airport to Hwy 22
should be called Airport Rd.
is
City Engineer Rodeberg commented on the urban expansion
boundary and the possibility of city service across
Campbell Lake.
The consensus of the Planning Commission is favorable to
the numbering system. Urban expansion boundaries could
possibly be made larger and the Planning Commission
directed staff to recommend an Urban Expansion District
at the March meeting.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT OF LUTZ /HAUGEN PROPERTY
City Attorney Barry Anderson commented on the agreement
and the revisions. Mr. Ebent suggested the agreement be
acted on in March to give commissioners time to review
the document.
(g) DISCUSSION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MARVIN WILLHITE
Mr. Willhite commented on his original proposal and his
plans for the property as once being approved. Building
Official Harka commented on the history of the request
and the use of the garage. Mr. Willhite presented
pictures showing the condition of his property.
Discussion followed on the existing two accessory
buildings and the construction of an attached garage as
opposed to detached.
n
U
3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COM14ISSION MINUTES
2/19/91
0
City Attorney Anderson commented on the request and the
fact another Public Hearing should be held for
neighboring property owners comments. There is favorable
consensus among the Planning Commission members for the
request.
(h) ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Mr. Ebent moved to elect Bill Craig for the office of
chairman, seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried
unanimously. Mr. Lenz moved to elect Clint Gruett as
Vice Chairman, seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried
unanimously. Chairman Craig also recommended to renew
Mr. Gruett's term for another 5 years.
(i) DISCUSSION OF SHORELAND ORDINANCE PROPOSAL
There will be discussion at the March meeting.
5. OLD BUSINESS
(a) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE
Building Official Marka will request Bill Weber to send
comments in writing if possible.
(b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Building Official Marka commented on a proposal by Dakota
Rail to have Pick Industries repair railroad cars. They
are not proposing to build a building.
A representative for Dakota Rail commented on the purpose
of the request to renovate railroad car decks. The site
will have fire extinguishers and the zoning is industrial
already. They would begin immediately.
Discussion followed on the hours of work on the cars and
the possibility of sandblasting, painting and welding on
the site. The representative will verify that will not
be a possibility. City Attorney Barry Anderson commented
this is not a legal question but it would be useful to
get a firm understanding with Pick Industries of what is
to be done over the 5 months. He suggested that Pick
Industries, Dakota Rail and the City draw up an agreement
to clear up any questions. This issue is for Planning
Commission information and the City Council will act on
the issue.
4 •
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
2/19/91
• Building Official Marka commented on the Bob Elliott
request. Mr. Elliott has a 3 year lease from Quast's for
parking. Mr. Marka will issue the permit with the
consensus of Planning Commission.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
9:40 p.m.
•
5
.. - rn!i yti_v- t�um�ers f�ssC • ,� � �i
BSgn
City of Hutchinson
. h
FEE: $25.00 APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICE1 oved by:
3lding
Fire
Application shall be submitted at Police
r{ ( l t east _ days prior to the Gambling occasion
t�1 \1 U'c e Dr c— AND I, S,YV� �o ccic Y�
Name of Authorized Of icer of Name of Designated Gambling
Organization Manager
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct
the game of gamblingin accordance with the provisions of the City of
Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349
for the license year ending
Signature
Authorized Officer of Organization D
f j ignated Gambling Manager of
organization
A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer
• of the organization: `` ` p
1. True Name: pct \\ B F�
(last) (first) (middle)
2. Residence Address: 01c S M&
(street) (city) (state) (zip)
3. Date of Birth: S (o `f ( 4. Place of Birth
(mo /day /year) (city /state)
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes No _�. If Yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manage
of organization: tt c
1. True Name:
(last) (first) ` (middle)
2. Residence Address: 235 Iy��co'.n<;io.�s�. ���1c� ".v�c�. mo ss
(street) (city) (state) (zi ) t
3 • Date of Birth: ' 1 - 3--S I 4. Place of Birth: L.Vc`.e�
• (mo /day /year) (city /state)
I
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a
traffic offense? Yes No L . If yes, explain _
6. How long have you been a member of the organization? S �
7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official actiop
designating you gamblin manager.= F����
W.k G. \<vc�r�-
C. Game Information:
1. Place where gambling devices will be used L`ys
2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used A Dc.\ a -s nq
(date and /or day(s)
3. Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: of week)
From S:3a A M. To:5
P.M.
4. Maximum number of players
5. Will pr'_zes be paid in money or merchandise? Y11�ceL� c\;S
6. Will refreshments be served during th time the gambling
devices will be used? Yes No . If so, will a charge
be made for such refreshments? Yes NO
D. Organization Information: \k s
1. Address where regular meetings are held a -
t
2. Day and time of meetings
3. Is the applicant organizati n organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota? Yes No
4. How long has the organization been in existence? Co-s s
o��< Kam-
4a. How many members in the organization? Q {
5. What is the purpose of the organization?
6. Officers of the Organization:
Name Address Title
R 9 - 0L Br' I_ S1 - ;Jn0 ���� P ceS
S� ( \"S' - J ,. �.so � ` U�c�
1 UCCQ-
7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services
to the organization:
Name
Address
Title
U yy
D. Organization Information: (Continued)
8. In whose custody will organization records be kept? S
Name �, �.�k Address p3� C Y cLYGr �� �c1\ v
9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by players
while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed
premises, please state the
Name of Insurer and Policy No.
10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices
11. At ch a list of all active members of the organization.
E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity
bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization.
1. Name of bonding company
2. Address of bonding company
3. Amount and duration of bond
. 4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding
requirements. Yes )_ No
I declare that the information I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling,
and I will familiarize myself with the contents thereof.
r�\ n `
Subscribed and
Si ature of authorized officer of
Da u: 3 -9 -9 f
sworn to before me a notary public on this
19
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this
. 19
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
organ�.zation
day of
day of
Social Security Number:
• NV Business ID Number:
E
,1/ < (612) 587 -5151
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
NUTCNlNSON, M/NN. 55350
1. E M 0 R A N D U If
March 26, 1991
P
T0: Ron Kirchoff, Sergeant Hutchinson Police Dept.
FROM: Bonnie Baumetz, License Secretary
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FOR INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSES
Please review the following on -sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses
for the year 19911
Gold Coin
Victor:f.an Inn
The Underground
The Coach
V�As of today I have not received the necessary information or
'h renewal application and payment from O'Tooles.
These renewal applications will be acted on at the City Council
meeting tonight.
Thank you.
Recommend approval for renewal of On -sale Intoxicating liquor
licenses for the above named establishments.
Ron Kirchoff
cc: Steve Madson, Police Chief
S� \r • Jo���n �= . \cLrtc� , C TpC� e� , 7rom, :,� � � „ 1_ u
0
AFFIDAVIT
EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1989
I Margaret Jager AM OVER 65 YEARS OF AGE, OR
I AM ON DISABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, AND MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN:
Family Size Income
1 $7,560
2 $9,180
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $12.05 /MONTH FOR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE
WOULD IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK
REDUCTION OF THE CHARGE TO $1.50 /MONTH.
Signature
Street Address 625 Oak St
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
To: WATER DEPARTMENT
Date: Account Number
Data Change
To: CITY COUNCIL Da
Council Action : Approved Disapproved
" T --7.
L
CJ
is
EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 1989
AFFIDAVIT
I �'� - Z- AH OVER 65 YEARSJF AGE. OR I AM
ON DISABILITY S DEFINED BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, AND
MY INCOME PER YEAR IS LESS THAN:
FAMILY SIZE INCOME
1 =$7,560
2 $9,180
THE STANDARD CHARGE OF $14.71 FOR TRASH AND REFUSE SERVICE WOULD
IMPOSE A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON ME AND I THEREFORE ASK REDUCTION OF
THE CHARGE TO $1.50 PLUS THE NON TAXABLE GARBAGE CHARGE OF $1.00
PER MONTH.
SIGNATURE�
STREET ADDRESS
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
TO: WATER DEPARTMENT
DATE
DATA CHANGE
ACCOUNT NUMBER
TO: CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL ACTION : APPROVED
DATE
DISAPPROVED
March 18,1991
Council members:
On April 7, 1991 at 2:00 P.M. Mark Lietzau (V.F.W. Commander),
Elroy Schlueter (American Legion Commander), and myself, Becky Walradth,
would like to have the city council's permission to have a patriotic
gathering in Hutchinson's library square. The program will be a tribute
to all men and women who have served and are currently serving in our
Armed Forces. All organizing and arrangements have been made and the
many volunteers involved have pledged their support. (See attached agenda)
We will also be inviting everyone from the surrounding areas to participate.
In case of inclement weather, we would like to ask permission to
hold the tribute in the civic center with all rental fees waived for
0 this occasion.
Sincerely,
C.C.
Elroy Schluet%rk Lietzau
s
0
APRIL 7, 1991
2:00 P.M.
HU7CHINSON LIBRARY SQUARE
Hutchinson's tribute to all men and women who have
served and are currently serving in our country's
Armed Forces.
u
President George Bush has proclaimed April 5th, 6th,
and 7th as National „Days of Thanksgiving for the
liberation of Kuwait. He has asked that the nation
ring all church bells at 2:00 P.M. on April 7th '
and at that time he has asked that everyone bow
their heads in silent prayer.
2:00 P.M.: The program will open with the ringing
of church bells. Please bow your heads in
a
silent prayer.
•
�- -A
CALL TO ORDER: National Guard formation -1st Sergeant Don Merkins ,
POST COLORS: H.M.R.S. Mark Lietzau,Conmander, V.F.W.
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Elroy Schlueter, Commander, American Legion
NATIONAL ANTHEM: Pastor Brian Broise, Senior High Jazz Band directed by
Mr. Hydukovich
SYNOPSIS OF DAY: Mark Lietzau and Elroy Schlueter
INVOCATION: Pastor Brian Broise
SONS OF PEACE: Pastor Broise
ODE TO THE FLAG: Dick Hardie
AMERICA THE BEAUTIFUL: Pastor Broise
TIE A YELLOW RIBBON: The Cogleys
WHEN JOHNNY COMES MARCHING HOME: Warren Ekstrom
WHAT IS A VET? Mark Lietzau
SERVICE SONGS: Lyndon Peterson on keyboard
GOD BLESS AMERICA: Mike "ziff" Hardie
• MY COUNTRY 'TIS OF THEE: Mike Hardie
BOOGIE WOOGIE BUGLE BOY OF COMPANY B: The Cogleys
FROM A DISTANCE: The Cogleys
OH BEAUTIFUL FOR SPACIOUS SKIES: Mike Hardie
FALLEN COMRADES, P.O.W.'s, M.I.A.'s: Dick Hardie
,Echo Taps - bQvg INydukovich aI)d - Zoe Osf lvrJ
BALLOON RELEASE: Mayor Paul Ackland
HE WILL LIFT YOU UP ON EAGLE'S WINGS: The Cogleys
GOD BLESS AMERICA: (PLEASE JOIN HANDS) Roger Klinghagen
BENEDICTION: Announcement for fellowship; Roger Klinghagen
RETIRE COLORS: Mark Lietzau
Everyone is invited to sing along with the songs which are printed in
your program. Please join us for fellowship at the Elks Club following
J
• the program.
0
Thank you to everyone who attended this program
to show your love and support for our great nation,
the men and women who have and are currently protecting it,
and all the freedoms it encompasses.
We would like to thank everyone who worked on
this program and helped to make it a success.
Becky Walradth
Mark Lietzau V.F.W. Conmander
Elroy Schlueter Legion Commander
•
PLEASE REMEMBER!
Your support is greatly appreciated by the men and women currently
serving in our Armed Forces and their families. Display your flags
and yellow ribbons. It may take some time for many to return
from Operation Desert Storm, and the yellow ribbon means
'TILL THEY COME HOME!
1 1
• G
•
u
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director Parks & Recreation
DATE: March 20, 1991
RE: Recreation Center Request
Tentatively the Park and Recreation Department has reserved the
Recreation Center on April 7th, pending council action. Our
Sunday afternoon schedule 1:00 pm - 5:30 pm, is set up for
tennis rentals. The Ice Arena is unavailable due to a scheduled
activity (Hutch Open). All wrestling matches are completed on
Saturday with Sunday scheduled for clean -up by Wrestling Association
volunteers.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks £r Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled Payer -
M
(612)587-5 151
TY OF HUTCHINSON
/ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
'HINSON, MINN. 55350
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council___________________
FROM: Randy DeVrie DirectQr-Qf -Water and }p _ _ _ _ _ _
SUBJECT: Lab Training School fqij_HatjQD _Graham, -Dpexations_ _ _ _ _ _
According to City policy, all out of state conferences must have
council approval, I recommend approval of Wastewater lab Analysis II
• at the Chippewa Valley Technical College in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, for
April 15 -17, 1991. The total cost of this school will be less than
$200, and was budgeted for 1991.
RD /sk
•
Chippewa Vallev Technical College
P4aro MIN ana [OmpMe Ptl Iae,Mwwn P. MMed .nse.
Sv�.l N.nn L.l. EM^
� y
Prwan sFa a aEn eo- ra d cm ]P.n ss zY c.a.
ee+... � , u oon d. SS3S0
bw 7rF+ •' Caml
c .FM.P q
- ��ticli,nann_ - -_ (yI C}.Qoa-
SrF
h{If
M,r. P..N Plpn. W
�b12: 581 4alf
oY. aenm
Ya on' MF
M:
E.rNI.
p..
NYUnwy rrb.naw EMnr[ Ortw L� NI
' aF,n�kNaWMWn HUM
P L.4r.n .rrt9nRw+lk brnMr
]'lba. Ne wygnre
'b. +_
Xybn wn n Mqa ¢mpaM+
CrnM
ry � cc `` ll
Errpbv' Q.i_M3dT
1Lm.allbn yJydfuagrn
.N m
*Nn�.. 5 ir7 -3 � SI ErT
a3
Macs
ImIF
CWBSE MUmOEa
ryy
Tnn.
a[qn
NPa1M
F�
405
424
101
The Well
Q/12
8
rt-29
7-411
100
in in
5D6
406
101
Dist. System Maint.
9/13
SJO
m- 29
7.40
3.00
lQI40
506
125
101
Iron /Man anese Rem.
9/14
8:30
TBA
3.70
3.00
6.70
506
426
1101
2eolite Softening
9114
1:00
TBA
3.70
3.00
6.70
506
410
1101
gen. intro to wastewater
9/26
8:00
m-25
38.70
3.00
41.70
506
440
101
Wastewater Review
12/6
8:00
m -29
7.40
3.00.
10.40
504
450
101
Basic Electricity
1217
8:00
m -30A
7.40"
3.00
10.40
506
414
10 1
Adv. Activated Sludge
1/16
8:00
m-30A
12.90
3.00
15. 90
506
406
501
Centrifugal Piano
1/18
8:00
ITBA
7.40
1 3.00
10.40
506
410
r n w r
4
4 8
WW
506
407
SOF
Intro/Mechanical Sludge
4/18
8:00
F�2
7
4
01
Land Application/ Slud a
4/25
B:DO
7.40
3.00
10.40
506
429
501
Groundwater Review
5/16
9:00
7.40
3.00
0.
sgPra• Y1lw.i�. as 1 . ore 3 5 - 91 owaw nnx
"AU Yprwv. pw. CMpwr. N MMY C.Np cmv. w al..0 iCA pFME UBE 011Y CO MOf WPfIE 9ElQV TX6 LrE
NwWnn .rE P.brm.M dU. v .{e.FM M aka. .OR NWf HCUCf.N p.Lv
EM1
Innr. LF�
e.Pna.Ob Y.qF rN CW M'VapN i � on M�Mr.q.
Please circle the ClaSSes you wish to attend.
Mail registration form with total fees to: Chippewa Valley Technical College
Continuing Education Registration Clerk
620 W. Clairemont Avenue
Eau Claire, WI 54701
For further information contact: Bill Hunt
(7151 833 -6344
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 9457
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST
PURPOSE
DEPT.
BUDGET
VENDOR
Toxicity Test
$1,500
i
Testing
WWTP
Yes
Environmental
Monitoring
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
•
COST
PURPOSE
Date Approved: March 26, 1991
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
DEPT. I B DCET
VENDOR
Resolution submitted for Council action
by:
7-A-
(612) 587 -5151
f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, P.E. - Director of Engineerin
RE: Wal -Mart Site Development Plan and Specificat on Approval
Tim Loose of Bolton & Menk Engineers has discussed the plans and
specifications for the Wal -Mart site development, including City
watermain and sanitary sewer improvements, with the Engineering and
Building Departments. Revisions to the plans and specifications
• have been requested by the City, and are being incorporated into
the final plans and specifications by Bolton & Menk.
Mr. Loose will have a final set of the plans and specifications
available for review on Monday. The Engineering Department
recommends approval of the plans and specifications, based on the
inclusion of all requested revisions.
cc: Jim Marka - Building Official
0
?-A.
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 26, 1991
TO: Mayor & c ity council
FROM: Wate Billing Department
SUBJECT: Deli nquent water & sewer accounts for the month of Mar
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of March. Recommend service be discontinued on
Monday, 1pril 1st, 1991 at Noon.
•
L J
q—,4.
1 -270- 0804 -093
Judy Kopesky
Box 606
Hutchinson MN 55350
804 Brown St
309.84
1- 270- 0835 -023
Gary Miller
835 Brown St
Hutchinson MN 55350
835 Brown St
68.54
Promises 4/05/91
1- 360- 0215 -034
Darol Wylie
215 Division Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
215 Division Av
68.55
1- 395 -0505 -015
Barbara Heller
505 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
505 Franklin St S
51.64
1- 395 -0565 -086
Judy Kopesky
Box 606
Hutchinson MN 55350
565 Franklin St S
196.70
1 -395- 0645 -022
Andrew Ross
645 Franklin St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
645 Franklin St S
82.84
1 -455- 0026 -081
Charles Pearson
26 Grove St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
26 Grove St S
97.14
1 -455 -0316 -071
Gary Piehl
316 Grove St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
316 Grove St S
129.27
Promises 4/05/91
Triad
Box 412
Hutchinson MN 55350
21 Hassan St N
103.12(Total closing
bill = $148.68)
1 -570- 0916 -012
Mike Paulson
916 Jefferson St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
916 Jefferson St S
39.98
Promises 4/5/91
1- 680 - 0206 -071
Elliotts Eatery
206 Main St N
Hutchinson MN 55350
206 Main St N
404.45
1 -685- 0556 -082
Judy Kopesky
Box 606
Hutchinson MN 55350
556 Main St S
161.40
1- 685 - 0725 -041
Pearl Westlund
725 Main St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
725 Main St S
3s5' 4.a 8
1- 685- 0817 -034
David Hickle
817 Main St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
817 Main St S
125.70
cc: Ben Menton
Rt 1 Box 16
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises $62.85 - 4/10/91
$62.8S - 4/17/91
0
•
p:
(612)
H•U•T•C- H•I•N•S•0 - M•I•N• S -T•
37 Washington Ave. W. • Hutchinson, MN 55350
March 19, 1991
To: Citv Council
From: Kay Johnson, MAIh51 = Project Manager
47e have scheduled our Spring promotion to rum from Mav 1 -June 15.
7b help brighten ur the look of Main Street, we would like to
hang brightly colored rv1on flags from the flag holders currently
In place. The colors of the flags will be deteradned by the
design created by Ingleman Design.
We are asking the Council's reredssion to take down the American
flaps currently in glace and renlace than with the above described
flag by Mav 1, 1991.
Thank you.
(612) 587 -5151
f/UTlN' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 15, 1991
TO: /Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
Randy DeVries, Water /Wastewater Operations
RE: Industrial Wastewater Discharge Fee
In July of 1991 Industrial Wastewater Permits with our industries are due
to be renewed. We are recommending a permit application fee of $100.00 per
year for each permit. This fee will cover monitoring inspection and
administration procedures. Reference Section 3.31 Industrial Wastewater
Pretreatment Rules and Regulations, Subd. 7.
JPR /RD /pv
cc: Gary D. Plotz, City Administration
Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
i s
_C '
RESOLUTION NO. 9458
RESOLUTION SETTING FEES FOR PERMIT APPLICATIONS
FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER PERMITS
WHEREAS, Chapter 3, Section 3.31, Subd. 6 and 7 of the
Hutchinson Municipal Code provides for fees to recover implemen-
tation and administration costs for the Industrial Wastewater
Treatment Program in the City of Hutchinson,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the permit application fee for Industrial Wastewater
Permits shall be set at $100.00 per year. The fee shall be
collected prior to the issuance of a new permit, or extension of
existing permit.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
q d
C
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Mary Haugen, Civic Arena Manager
DATE: March 19, 1991
RE: Bid Letting For New Entrance at The Civic Arena
The plans and specifications have been completed for the new front
entrance at the Civic Arena. Your authorization is needed to proceed
with the bid letting for this project. The cost estimate includes
demolition of the old entrance, construction of the new entrance and the
addition of two exit doors.
The design of the project has been presented to members of both the Park
• and Recreation Board and the Facility Improvement Committee. Their
recommendation has been to proceed with the project as presented.
This project is to be funded through the Capital Improvement Fund
created by the permanent fund transfer from Hutchinson Utilities. These
dollars are separate from the arena's operating budget and have been
dedicated to capital improvements.
If the project is put out to bid at this time, the bid would be awarded
April 23rd and construction could begin immediately following the
completion of our spring building rentals. Construction is estimated to
last for 90 days or less. This timeframe would best accommmodate
additional building rentals in late August and September.
Thank you for your consideration.
klm
Cihj Halt
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks fr Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on nryded paper -
9 -�>
0
SouTN e?ivf, uumo1J
�mr II
1'l.
SOMESTROO. ROSEML Iwomurt If Fi
• ASSOGATES, we I�LfTGII� UVIG ARENA- Y Vf�(1t�Ul.� Dp>'lo Dole; : 51!4 9p 9• NO.
Engine k A"CutKla Nu1r -N iNSO�I MANN SOTk : i" - �o' -�" Comm
St. Pohl, Ninnefoto 1
V
0 • i
,."ME.Or.
II Imo, i�W
NEW 4 1 ( �-_ `- 9& 9ACKS 4 p[ANTS
R M1P =�
I - I
OOKSTRW. ROSH AAIDVtLW HUTU
NO O CIVIC, M 04% MF OD W FIW9 R.AN outc bl!)lJW F'9 N�•
• ASSOOA7E5. VC. e i 1 --
Eegift s a Ardit ctm �}ur�NIN�oN, MINN�Ot'a� I Io -o ��T.z3�o4.. 2
St Pouf. Minnooto
V, PARKS • RECREATION • FORESTRY
900 HarHnplon Street Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
(612) 587.2975
SENIOR CENTER CIVIC ARENA
�iam�wA 587 -6564 587-4279 4
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Mary Haugen, Civic Arena /Pool Manager
DATE: August 15, 1989
SUBJECT: Civic Arena Retro -fit
The following 5 -year plan reflects the priorities for Civic Arena improvements
as presented to and discussed by the Parks and Recreation Board and the
Facility Improvement Board.
These decisions are based on the assumption of $150,000 being available over
five years. Some very basic items need to be addressed immediately. These
items are listed under year *1 and year *2. Years *3 and *4 are grouped
together as one of these projects will cost nearly $50,000. Many of the dollar
amounts shown are different. than these listed in the engineer's report. This
is based on the assumption that city labor would be utilized in some instances.
Year *5 and beyond shows the big ticket items of the new refrigeration system
and the enclosed upper deck /heated lobby. The largest single item, the new
refrigeration system, is listed at $588,000. Another less expensive approach
is as follows:
- Rebuild existing compressors (as shown in year *1.)
--Replace c_uncrete floor with new "brine" floor with
city to do removal of old floor.
This would result in a savings of approximately 50%. We would then be able to
utilize our existing refrigeration equipment, rebuilt and resized to fit the
new in -floor piping system.
The enclosed upper deck has been a request from arena user groups for a number
of years. A primary function of the Facility Improvement Board was to help in
the planning and design of such a project. Now they are in the process of
generating funds to help construct such an addition.
Based on the uncertainty of funding for both of these large projects, they are
shown as happening in year *5 and beyond. The replacement of the
refrigeration system should be considered within five years as the existing
equipment, mainly the plastic matting, simply wasn't designed to last longer
than fifteen years.
Enclosing the lobby and building an enclosed upper deck would be an
outstanding addition to the arena, but basic needs such as replacement of the
refrigeration system must first be addressed.
The majority of the less expensive improvements could be paid for with the
$150,000, leaving the new floor and the upper deck /heated lobby projects to
seek funding rrom other sources. !
Mayor & City Council
August 15, 1989
Page two
This plan is to be used as a guideline, subject to change depending upon
availability of funds. At this point, we need to address immediate concerns.
Your approval is requested for the items listed under year il. We would like
to begin work on those items and to receive bids on such items as the
resurfacer replacement, compressor rebuild, and mat repair.
Year 01 -1989
Note: The present resurfacer needs
approximately $3000 in updates
to make it comply to present
standards of air - quality and
and other general updates.
1) Resurfacer replacement
List price $ 41,500
Trade in allowance _13
28,500
Citizen's Bank
advertising payment Z14.250
Balance $ 14,250
2) Mat repair 2,000
3) Rebuild compressors 6 -8,000
4) Site drainage (prtl.) 1,000
5) Building shell repairs 5 00
$ 25,750
Year #2-1990 Replace front entrance $ 360
Year #3 and t4 -1991 & 1992 1) Replace hockey boards $ 50,000
2) Remodel bathrooms 19 ,700
$ 69,700
Year i5 -1993 1) Install arena ventilation system $ 57,000
2) Replace light fixtures 26,800
3) build new heated lobby /team rooms
and enclosed upper deck 128,900
4) Locker rooms remodeled and
ventilation 39,100
5) Replace arena floor and refrigeration
System 588,000
$816,800
11
City of Hutchinson
950 Harrington
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Mr. Mary Haugen
Civic Arena Manager
Re: Civic Arena Modifications
File No. 23304
Dear Marv,
Enclosed is our proposal for the new entrance elevation and plan as well as my
site visit noted for the Civic Arena.
We are using the existing louver as a design element. This was done partly in
response to a snow drifting problem which would occur if we left it exposed
above a flat roof.
Our proposal includes a sloped metal roof behind a pyramidal parapet wall con-
structed of concrete block.
You might consider the use of industrial type wall mounted lights. These
would direct light down on the sidewalk and be inexpensive. However, if they
do not meet your requirements, we could install post mounted lights similar to
what you have at the other building.
We feel the rocks and plants along the building will have to be removed to
improve the drainage in order that frost heaving of floor slab? Sight be
eliminated.
The construction cost estimate for the schematic design is $38,400.00 with
margin of error of plus or minus 102.
The survey information and the signed contracts must be furnished before we
can proceed with the design development drawings.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROVJT, AN i ASSOCIATES, INC.
rr�
T omas R. derson
TRA:li
• - Encl.
30
2335 West Highway 36 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 a 612 - 636 -4600
om a breaon FE.
rem A Galm Ff.
Janes R. Mem6 PE.
W1 L Ards AJA
B ones t roc
ft ft W Ff.
Miler/ W FOOK ►E.
61FeT F Anftr ►E.
Gary F. 4%rd, FE
Joepi C. &Vmk Ff.
D AU C. hgm PE.
►Wk t ML Ff.
Mb a J N ►E.
Rosene
►Un L Sa FE.
Jerry A EwFavt ►E
ease C. 4mR AIA
L FW14 or" a FE.
0
Ou1se E. UM FE.
Mat A Meson PI
Timm E. AnpA ►E
erne C. ftM AJA
Anderlik &
,a es C oast RE
G1 E Cool FE.
TM C Fetl PE
Ma.4e A saraa FE
A¢es M 614 A1C.P
•
Imes E Noyes FE.
Mast/ T 6101Wet ►E.
i10lrl E. Nome. PE.
Q~ J Espn ►E.
Mal A LV FE.
Jerry D Fermat PE.
Cerro carer, PE.
A ssociates
a oa G SChLow L PE.
Dario Q 1-- PS
N11q J Caftwt PE
Chas A Enrpon
5es1 M. Eoerrl. CIA.
Time: W Fmwn P.E.
6"k" MWWW ►E.
:LO M. Pw.ebky
Engineers 8 Architects
MdW C Lrat Pf.
Mal Q WtlS PE.
Hann M Oxon
September 4, 1990
City of Hutchinson
950 Harrington
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Mr. Mary Haugen
Civic Arena Manager
Re: Civic Arena Modifications
File No. 23304
Dear Marv,
Enclosed is our proposal for the new entrance elevation and plan as well as my
site visit noted for the Civic Arena.
We are using the existing louver as a design element. This was done partly in
response to a snow drifting problem which would occur if we left it exposed
above a flat roof.
Our proposal includes a sloped metal roof behind a pyramidal parapet wall con-
structed of concrete block.
You might consider the use of industrial type wall mounted lights. These
would direct light down on the sidewalk and be inexpensive. However, if they
do not meet your requirements, we could install post mounted lights similar to
what you have at the other building.
We feel the rocks and plants along the building will have to be removed to
improve the drainage in order that frost heaving of floor slab? Sight be
eliminated.
The construction cost estimate for the schematic design is $38,400.00 with
margin of error of plus or minus 102.
The survey information and the signed contracts must be furnished before we
can proceed with the design development drawings.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROVJT, AN i ASSOCIATES, INC.
rr�
T omas R. derson
TRA:li
• - Encl.
30
2335 West Highway 36 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 a 612 - 636 -4600
Bonestroo
0 Rosene
Anderiik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
November 1, 1990
City of Hutchinson
950 Harrington
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Attn: Mr. Mary Haugen
Re: Civic Arena Modification
File No. 23304
Dear Marv,
Cho G. Leeman RE,
RM A Ca "M RE.
Jemµ R Msn6 PE.
Tome R. A11*MM AJA
Raos1 W Rafse. PE.
E10W W. FbW FE.
QMM ► ft* m FE.
Goy P kW dK FE.
Jnupn C. M� FE.
OuW C. LFgmR ►E.
Mn R. bRL PE.
Wn L Jewel PE,
Minn L. Smuu. ►E.
JM A. Lash PY.
Raant C. NUML AJA
L Azt Goo a PE.
Rkf W E. UM. PE.
YPk A. KY FE.
Timm E. &VA PE.
Rm,e C. Pkn AJA.
J C. Own RE
*0 K. Feld PE.
Hm" A SWONd PE.
AWM M. " AICP
Ginn R. Ca ►E.
Moue T. ft m RE
D~ J Eove FE.
Jerry o. Pseavt PE.
T,oayf E. PbJei PE
Room R. Pe1LYe. PE.
Ms A. 5eµ ►E.
Cab Ozmer. ►E.
Rmn G. YiM,nmL PE.
0a Q 10—. P.E.
map J Ca *L PE.
Uses A. eakmn
Stun M. EGe,n CIA.
Tk z W. Peerzon. PE.
Was Ms PE.
LW M. huehky
MOWN C. Lyndt Pf.
VW D WR•L PE.
Noun M. Orion
Enclosed are the specifications for the above referenced project for the
City's review and approval.
Our revised estimate for the project is $49,540.00 but I might add such a
small project is very hard to estimate and the variation can be as much as 10Z
either direction. This estimate is higher than the one submitted September 4,
1990 for the following reasons:
1. Site work was more extensive than originally contemplated by $1,700.
2. The mechanical was much more extensive than originally expected. The
ductwork has to be extended, and a fire sprinkler system has to be placed
in the ceiling. This cost $2,000 more than originally estimated.
3. The electrical engineers found we had to relocate panels and run a large
cable for the electric heaters more than 500 feet. These costs were
$2,500 more than originally estimated.
4. The General Conditions profit and overhead is $2,200 more than originally
thought.
The drawings do not contain any landscaping which is to be installed by City
forces.
The principle design element for the new entrance is meant to tie this facil-
ity to the one across the parking lot.
If you have any questions, please call.
Yours very trul
BONESTR00, ROSr NE, ANDERRLLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4 Thos. Anderson
TRA :li
Encl.
30
2335 West Highway 36. • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612 -636 -4600 ,
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
FROM: Ron Kirchoff, Sergeant
DATE: March 20, 1991
RE: Application for Peddlers, Solicitors & Transient
Merchants License
----------------------------------------------------------- -- - - --
On March 18, 1991, I was requested by the City Council to complete
a background investigation on Rick William Kline representing
Midwest City Directory.
Investigation into the background of Mr. Kline showed that there
was no criminal record in the Belmond, Iowa, area. Upon completing
this investigation I checked into the validity of Midwest City
Directory. In doing so I spoke with Investigator Borrell of the
Belmond Iowa Police Department. He stated that Midwest City
• Directory had been based out of their city for several years and
as of this date has no complaints lodged against it.
Based on the following information I would recommend that the city
council approve the application for the transient merchant license.
/lkg
91 -02 -0007
0
9 -JE-
ecei pF 6
APPLICATION
FOR
- EDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRA`1SIENT MERCHANTS
2" x 2" Picture NAME and DRIVER'S LICENSE INFORMATION
reau'red y
NAME: JlL�uK u� (.tbtii Glt .. c4T
Q �
PERMANENT ADDRESS: O Rte/. sCyl
PERMANENT TELEPHONE: / ft?p- Vf- /,2?7
TEMPORARY LOCAL ADDRESS:
TEMPORARY TELEPHONE ACCESS: NP
DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER (STATE) NIA (9)
HEIGHT WEIGHT EYE COLOR
0 How many days?
FEES & LENGTH OF PERMIT REQUESTED
Months?
Or year?
LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Application Fee of $25 applied towards the following permit feels)
Solicitors, per day ......... ............................... S 25.00
Solicitors, Per year ........ ............................... 52CO.00
Transient Merchants, per day ............................... S 25.00
Transient Merchants, per year .............................. $200.00
Peddlers, per day ........... ............................... S 25.00
Peddlers, Per year .......... ............................... S270.00
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR V:DLATICN OF A.+
MLN ;O;PAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES • NO
IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PUNISHMENT OR PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE:
MIDWEST
CITY DIRECTORY
P.O. Box 305 • Belmond. Iowa 50421
. Phone 1- 800 - 728 -1287
• W,hlon o, OM,CIw, SeMCe Comyn,
{
Rick Kline
211 4th St. S.E. a Belmond, IA 50421 1
515 -444 -4022
DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED: /,l/ g4 A
DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY:
DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE OF SUPPLY - NAME & ADDRESS OF SUPPLIER:
3
Ll
PROVIDE TWO (2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR CHARACTER REFERENCES:
NAME & ADDRESS:
Ph,NE NUMBER:
NAME & ADDRESS:
P40NE 'DUMBER:
STATE LAST CITY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY:
CITY /S+" "ATE NAME:
DATE CF ACTIVITY: FROM: ��j p _ TO: / 2P�9
Al -,0(4� c6o�e
cl
"-O-a " o ia.
WWI
I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica-
tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.*
I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the
:eddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance No. 673 is guilty of
a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex-
ceeding $500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus,
in either case, the costs of prosecution.
Signature of Applicant Date
* No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one
week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required
picture.
OFFICE USE
POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION:
•
1911
RELEASE OF INFO akTION
9
As an applicant fora PeddlersiSolicitors /Transient Merchants License from
t -e City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, I am required to Turn: sh 1 —at G:. ^,1 G'1 t
may use in dete.:_ining my coral, physical, ..eat�l and f�r,an- c.1 q•aL`fic_
tic. =.s. In this connection, I hereby expressly authorize release of anv and all i n-
for -atien whi&.. you may have ccnce---iing me, including inforration of a ccnci_eat'_al
or privileged nature.
I hereby release the agency with which I am seeking application for license,
and any organization, company or person furnishing infor --ation to that agency as
e: ressic authorized above, from any liability for daca_e which cav result from
fa.:,ishi_-ig the information requested.
Applicant's Full
Printed Name:
Applicant's Address:
Arr'i: ant's Birth Date:
Ap plicant's Place of Birth:
Ap71lica::t's Social Security No.:
A, pL- __nt's Driver's License No.:
1"z,zi 64
(Firs t
dd1e
9
uc^ e r
Stre
n n d W/ e h * .I D yg
ty) J (Cccnty) (State
�r
(Month) (Day) (Yeas)
(City) (State
Date: / 7 `! / `L`� `� /` •
(612) 587 -5151
I T Y OF HUTCHINSON
VASHING TON AVENUE WEST
,HINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, P.E. - Director of Engineerint
RE: Airport Consultant Selection \\
Following the "Procedures for Selection of Consultants" as outlined in FAA
Advisory Circular AC 150 /5100 -14B, the Airport Commission and myself, acting as
the Selection Committee, interviewed the following short list of consultants on
March 18, 1991:
• SEH (Short Elliot Hendrickson)
Becher -Hoppe
TKDA (Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates)
Based on a comparison of qualifications, the committee selected TKDA as the
primary consultant to provide services for the proposed airport improvements.
It is proposed to immediately begin negotiations on project scope and cost of
services as outlined in the FAA Advisory Circular. These will be presented at
the April 9, 1991 meeting.
In order to make the proposed schedule (attached) immediate action is required.
If the engineering services agreement can not be reached with TKDA, the next
consultant on the list would enter into negotiations. The Selection Committee
recommends the consultants in the following order:
1. TKDA
2. SEH
3. Becher -Hoppe
JPR /pv
CC. Doug Meier
Airport Commission
•
�_ /
Proposed Program Schedule
Hutchinson Municipal Airport
March 18, 1991
1991
March 14 Proposal Deadline
March 18 Interview
March - 7 Selection notification
April,,i ° Proposed engineering services acceptance by City Council
April � b Proposed engineering services to MnDOT and FAA
April,* Begin design and topographic surveys
April 15 Predesign meeting
June 28 Plans and specifications completion .
July 12 Plans & spec comments and authorization to advertise for bids
by Airport Commission, MnDOT and FAA
July 17 Final plans & specifimions
July 19 Advertise for Bids
August 15 Open Bids
September 3 Award Bids subject to MnDOT and FAA funding
September 27 FAA Grant Agreement acceptance
or later
1992
May Start Construction - Phase 1
October 31 Construction completion/fmal inspection - Phase 1
' Subsequent phases to be initiated as City, MnDOT and FAA funding becomes •
available.
' Sequence of steps will include final engineer's report and project close -out.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON MINNESOTA
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 3
SUPPLEMENT TO CONTRACT 50.LEI2'ING
SHEET 1 OF=
(CONTRACTOR: (FEDERAL PROJECT ISTATE PROJECT (CITY PROJECT I
I WK. MUELLER d SONS, INC. !
I 9 0- 09,- 10,- 11, -1
ADDRESS: ILOCATION: I
P.O. BOX 247. HAMBURG, MN 55339 I
I
T.H. 7 EAST (LETTING N0. 8 /PROJECT N0. 90-16) j
(THIS CONTRACT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
I
I
I THE FOLLOWING WORK WAS COMPLETED BY JUUL
i
CONTRACTING ON TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 EAST IN 1990.
ALL WORK WAS REQUESTED BY THE CITY AND WAS NOT COVERED UNDER THE ORIGINAL PROJECT. j
I THE EXTRA WORK COVERS REPLACEMENT OF DETERIORATING WATERMAIN APPURTENANCES, AND NEW
STORM SEWER EXTENSION TO SERVE POTENTIAL
I
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HTI BUSINESS PARK.
I ON 10" VALVE WEST OF MICHIGAN AVE.
I
I ROD EXTENSION 1 EACH @
i
# 131.63 j
I ON 6" WATERMAIN ON BREMI% _
j 6" VALVE a BOX 1 EACH @
I
# 465.00 j
AT GARDEN ROAD (STORM SEWER CROSSING)
I F S 1 18" RCP 48 L.F. @ #20.00 /L.F.
# 1,960.00 I
HYDRANT EXTENSION:
BY HUTCH MOTEL - F b 1 18 EXTENSION
; 363.00
BY BREMIX - INSTALL 18" EXTENSION
I
# 57.00 I
TOTAL INVOICE
# 2.976.63 I
j BONDING d INSURANCE
297.66 I
TOTAL INCREASE
# 3.274.29
I ORIGINAL CONTRACT
#313,166.80
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 (INCREASE)
i
# 22,162.40
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 (INCREASE)
I
; 8,155.41
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 3 (INCREASE)
I
# 3,274.29 I
I TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
I
I
I
i
;346,758.90 I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j
►Original Contract Amount I
I
I
i ;313,166.80 (Dated:
19_
(Original Contract Date 1
I I
, I
Director of Engineering i
I 5 -22 -1990 (Dated:
19_
I
I I
Contractor I
I
•I IDated:
I
19_ I
I
I
Mayor
I IDated:
t9—
I
City Administrator
(612) 587 -5151
f/UTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
T0: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Rodeberg, P.E. - Director of Engineering
RE: Discussion of Main Street Striping
Keith Voss, MnDOT Traffic Engineer for District 8, will be at the
March 26th Council Meeting to discuss the proposed changes to the
Main Street (Trunk Highway 15) traffic lane markings. He will
discuss the proposed addition of center turn lanes on Main Street,
traffic problem areas, and options for increasing the visibility of
• proposed and existing lane markings on Trunk Highways 7, 15 and 22.
A Public Hearing is proposed to be held at the April 9, 1991
Council Meeting to receive public comment on the proposed
improvements.
CC: Larry Karg - Street Supervisor
Skip Quade - Downtown Committee
Kay Johnson - MainStreet Coordinator
• RESOLUTION NO. 9445
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 91 -01
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Glen Street from
Washington Avenue to 2nd Avenue S.W. and 1st Avenue S.W. from Glen Street to
Franklin Street by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer,
Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing, Sidewalk and
Appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the City
Council for approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official newspaper, an Advertisement for Bids upon the making of such
• improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on Monday, April 22nd, 1991,
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director
of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the City
Council on April 23rd, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during
consideration of the bids will be given an opportunity to address the Council on
the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent (10 %) of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council of this 26th day of March, 1991.
Mayor Paul Ackland
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz
•
9 -z-
RESOLUTION NO. 9446 .
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT NO. 91 -02
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of Delaware Street by
the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services, Lift Station and
Appurtenances, and has presented such plans and specifications to the City
Council for approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCIIINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official newspaper, an Advertisement for Bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall •
state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on Monday, April 22nd, 1991,
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director
of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the City
Council on April 23rd, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during
consideration of the bids will be given an opportunity to address the Council on
the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent (10 %) of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council of this 26th day of March, 1991.
Mayor Paul Ackland
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz
u
RESOLUTION NO. 9447
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 6
PROJECT NO. 91 -10, 91 -12
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of:
Project No. 91 -10 Elks Drive and Sherwood Street from Century Avenue to
300' South of Elks Drive in Schmidtbauers 4th Addition
by the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain,
Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and
Gutter, Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances;
Project No. 91 -12 8th Avenue S.W. from Graham Street to Wagner Street and
Wagner Street in Wagner Development Corporation Plat by
the Construction of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Services,
Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel Base, Curb and Gutter,
Bituminous Base, Surfacing and Appurtenances,
and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in
the official newspaper, an Advertisement for Bids upon the making of such
improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 P.M. on Monday, April 22nd, 1991,
in the Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director
of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the City
Council on April 23rd, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall,
Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during
consideration of the bids will be given an opportunity to address the Council on
the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent (10%) of the
amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council of this 26th day of March, 1991.
Mayor Paul Ackland
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz
9-s
RESOLUTION NO. 9448
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 8
PROJECT NO. 91 -15
WHEREAS, pursuant to an Advertisement for Bids for the 1991 Asphalt
Pavement Crack Sealing Program, including the sawing or routing, cleaning and
sealing cracks in existing bituminous pavement within the City of Hutchinson,
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids
were received complying with the advertisement:
Bidder
Sioux Falls Surface Seal
Bargen, Inc.
Bergmann Companies, Inc
Quality Seal, Inc.
Action Enterprises
Amount
$14,720.00
$16,272.00
$17,104.00
$18,716.64
$20,992.00
AND WHEREAS, it appears that Sioux Falls Surface Seal of Sioux Falls, South
Dakota, is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
• HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to
enter into the attached contract with Sioux Falls Surface Seal of Sioux Falls,
South Dakota, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement
contained herein, according to the Plans and Specifications therefore approved
by the City Council and on file in the Office of the City Administrator.
2. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to return
forthwith to all bidders, the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposit of the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been
signed and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until
satisfactory completion of the Contract.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
Mayor Paul Ackland
•
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz
?—C
BID TABULATION
CITY OF NUTCKIN30N
. LETTING NO. B
PROJECT 91 -15
•
DATE 3 -11 -1991
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
BARGER, INC.
P.O. BOX 262
%
$16,272.00
MOUNTAIN LAKE, MN 56159
BLACKTOP REPAIR SERVICE
16340 NOWTHEN BLVD.
ANOKA, MN 55303
NORTHWEST ASPHALT
RR 2, BOX 172
GOODRIDGE, MN 56725
QUALITY SEAL, INC.
3970 WINNETKA AVE.
X
18,716.64
NEW HOPE, MN 55427
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS, INC.
2825 CEDAR AVENUE SO.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407
ACTION ENTERPRISES
3135 DEERFIELD W., DRAWER 10
X
20,992.00
SUAMIKO, WISC. 54173
CONSTRUCTION MA TERIALS , INC.
6725 OXFORD ST.
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426
ASTECH ASPHALT SURFACE TECH.CORP.
P.O. BOX 1025
ST. CLOUD, MN 56302
BERGMANN COMPANIES, INC.
310 -9TH AVE.
X
17,104.00
EAU CLAIRE, WISC. 54703
MCBROOK CONSTRUCTION, INC.
ON THE MILL POND
NEW LONDON, MN 56273
9 -s
BID TABULATION
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LETTING NO.
PROJECT 91 -15
DATE 3 -11 -1991
BIDDER
SURETY
AMOUNT
DELIVERY
SIOUX FALLS SURFACE SEAL
P.O. BOX 1754
SIOUX FALLS, SD 57103
X
14,720.00
L & M CLEANING
BOX 74
BELGRADE, MN 56312
E
•
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0 R A N D U H
DATE: March 20, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of "North Oak Ridge"
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a preliminary plat.
HISTORY
On February 15, 1991, Kevin Compton, submitted an application for
a preliminary plat to be known as "North Oak Ridge ", located in
• Helland's Addition. A public hearing was held at the regular
meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 19, 1991, at
which time there were neighboring property owners present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, will submit
certification that the proposed plat meets all the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per Preliminary
and Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
it is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned preliminary plat be approved subject to staff
recommendations of March 5, 1991, as follows:
1. Walk outs approved at plat time.
• 2. Verify setbacks at rear on cul de sac.
3. Name proposed for cul de sac.
4. Soil boring report required.
/ A
5. Park land previously paid with land
6. Park board approval.required
7. Addresses to be on Final Plat
8. Plat to show garage slab elevation not top of block
9. All trees 8" in diameter or greater shall be shown.
10. Reduce Carolina St to 32' and add radius at corners.
11. Hydrants to be approved by Fire Marshal.
Also, the utilities issue regarding rear yard easements is to be
addressed. Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Block one are to be designated for
walkout type homes only.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
u
•
1
r i � Cc:w •rES �.
i ! f
V '.
. , \. \\ 3 I � a - i4F � r • 4 a ] Yt.:.TFi.i rJ L�T� •i.`/�\'\)•� \,��tE '� i
\ � l t <Re K;C I ! P• `ll \IIl1 �+t' ""
w
LCNTN •YCMUE 1� \r i.
CAROLINA
74 C VAC
L
NLl wMC 2; 2
y }
\ '.. Il i J211 xti - .F)T Pt )a P�
N: TE'' y i � � x W f. u l 4E' l.YJ3 .•E_ -iNO: Y ! 2
S AREA TO BE
* PLATTED
- e `••) , "NORTH OAK RIDG •e P
\ 'L,!__�_ +Jr -`j'a t3 ') { •---- Fa.Z\YC - • • - l._w.ee:
PAOX
_ _ o
Atka -F_• �34
y
0.11 .1
yo
I i \
! i + •� -
o
i
1 La
y.w -.
L . LR YCVM CO!,'.PTON
HUTCHIN� MIN.
4 '0
3
....... . ......
.11 1 L 1.. 1..
AII. _ .. IH
.-CA t4
nf A
,-to'sl 3 2 AC-ES
7
0
,to
_...
... I
. .
I
-1.0 _
. moo .. . ...
1110
P.M
- - . , 1.
........ .
.....
4
IJ3 '
2'.'.�
3
C\J
% I I
aco - ,
_...
... I
. .
I
-1.0 _
. moo .. . ...
1110
P.M
- - . , 1.
........ .
.....
2'.'.�
3
.-I.1 S
FM� 1 1.1.11
OltN-
MIA
w
MEMORANDUM
TO: JON RODEBERG and the HUTCHINSON CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: SCOTT PETERSON
1265 7TH AVE. NW
RE: PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE OAK RIDGE ADDITION
FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON.
DATE: 3 -19 -91
I have reviewed the proposed platting of the Oak Ridge
development and discussed it with several of my neighbors.
Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the Planning Commission
meeting of 3 1 19 but would like to take this opportunity to
register my opinion, and that of others affected, about this
proposed platting.
A. It is disappointing to see the lack of imagination
displayed in the proposed subdivision of this parcel,
straight streets and rectangular lots. It misses the
potential for this area to be developed into something
• extraordinary and settles for something less.
B. It is also disappointing to note that no provision has
been made to leave green space anywhere within this parcel.
This is the only naturally wooded area left in the city for
residential development. It would seem to be a reasonable
requirement to attempt to maintain some of its character
through dedication of green space or natural areas within
it.
When some of the original residents along the north side
of 7th Ave. NW bought their lots, they were told that the
area now proposed for development would be parkland. Two
were even required to grant easements for public access to
this area. For some unknown reason, the plan for the park
was abandoned and the easement was vacated. The point
remains however, that if it was attractive enough to
consider for park at one point, it seems reasonable that
some requirement should now be made to preserve some of this
natural beauty, before it is too late.
C. Most of the lots along the north side of the proposed
extension of Carolina Ave. are only 89' wide. This 1s a
relatively narrow lot which limits the type of construction
that can occur and reduces the options for locating the
building to preserve the trees on the property.
D. Question: Did the platting of Carolina Ave. and
Carolina Circle make any allowance for significant trees in
the proposed roadways? Lost trees of the size found in this •
area cannot be replaced in our lifetime. Maximizing the
preservation of these trees will enhance value of this
property for several generations of future homeowners.
To summarize, those of us who live in the area
surrounding this proposed development have grown quite fond
of this tangled plot of woods. It is the home to a wide
variety of wildlife and birds, and provides a beautiful
backdrop to the view from our yards and homes. It is also a
reminder of what much of this country must have looked like
before humans arrived to "improve" it. We have resigned
ourselves to the inevitability of its development, but hope
that it will be done with the maximum amount of care
possible taken to preserve its character and natural beauty.
We also have a vested interest, both in terms of quality of
life and dollars and cents, in trying to ensure that it is
developed with some sensitivity to its unique natural
character.
Thank you in advance for considering these issues as you
consider the platting and subdivision of this parcel.
•
•
r
(612) 587 -5151
HUTCH% CITY CF EUTCH INSON
" 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 20, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Pla nning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATIO OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MARVIN WILLHITE
465 HIGH ST
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a variance.
HISTORY
On February 22, 1991, Marvin Willhite, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a variance to reduce side yard setback from 10' to
6' on property located at 465 High St. A public hearing was held at
the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March
19, 1991, at which time was no one present who objected to the
request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
RECOM14ENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
variance be approved as set forth above contingent on removal of
one accessory building also, construction to begin in 6 months.
Respectfully submitted,
• William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
9 -/-
0
wn.t!
` r t 4 • ,I
V t v /
• J L
., vJ
I 11 �o
\ . n.♦o
c
/�
s)1 /• Bench Mark: Spike in Powet
p pol spproz BS lrrt i
southwest of SW Prop. corner
,ies +r f Elevation - 1075.19 I
\ °r
b J o + +e'
row ry • +o
D y v � o 4f p OS �� • r + +
. hi
Io
• 4
Y 6'
THE SOUTIii.LSTERLY 60.00 FELT OF TIIE FOLLOWING DESCRIbED PARCEL OF
LAND, AS MEASURED ALOItG T,,L NOrTHWESTLkLY L114E THEREOF:
11EGINNING AT THE MOST 00illhVKLY CONNER OF BLOCK 16 IN THE
TOW:JpITE OF hUTCHIN50N, NOI•lli HALF, ACCOkD1NG TO THE PLAT
TOF.PEUP OW FILE A1JD OF kLCOitD Iit TIIE OFFIIE OF THE COUNTY
RCCORDEP., MCLEOD COUNTY, RINNESOTA; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY
ALONG TIIE NOHTiI'•1ESTL8LY L1:•E OP SAID i.LOCl: 16, A DISTAY.CC OF
21b. 2u FLETI Tlli:XE SUV:'11EJ.77LRLY, 1'AFALLEI. WITH THE NORTH -
6 ES70,LY LINE OF SAID kLCaK lu, TO TIIE. LLST kIGIT OF WAY LINE
OF '111C MINNESOTA W'ESTEkN h,.ILWAY CV1i'ANY; TIII:NCF. NOR7'HE1
AI.OH. SAID WEST N'C.11'P OF t:AY LIDS, 76SA',L)i &8i Hr ASYEliLY LINE
OF bLOCK 16, 7'11E::CE UOV :IIWI:SfEk U', ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY
LING, TO THE PLACE OF LLG I;:1;111G.
' +r v+
?s )
9
b
9
h
♦ f„
• • 'Je
e,
O, e
r
I
1
i
•lit Denotes existing virvetini, ,
IY).tl Denotes prop..!srd alrvatlun
I I
I
o
t
e
+o .rae
N
O
d
h
s
•ae.q
b
RESOLUTION NO. 9449
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO
REDUCE SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 465 HIGH ST
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Marvin Willhite, Hutchinson, has applied for a variance
from Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce
side yard setback from 10' to 6' on property located at 465 High
St, with the following legal description:
The Southwesterly 60.00 feet of the following
described tract, as measured along the
Northwesterly line thereof; Beginning at the
Northwest Corner of Block Sixteen (16) in the
Townsite of Hutchinson North Half; thence
Southwesterly, along the West boundary line of said
Block 16, for a distance of 266.2 feet; thence
Southeasterly, parallel with the North line of said
Block 16, for a distance of 258.84 feet, to the
West boundary line of the Minnesota Western Railway
Company right of way, 327.6 feet, to the North line
of said Block 16; thence Northwesterly, along the
North line of said Block 16, a distance of 68.5
feet to the place of beginning.
The above described tract being a part of Lots One
(1) and Two (2) in Block Sixteen (16) in the
Townsite of Hutchinson , North Half.
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for
a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be approved.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger
of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in
the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the
surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in
such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect
be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land
. in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which such land is located.
4f
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant. it will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or
difficulty.
The application for variance for the purpose designated is
granted based upon the findings set forth above contingent on
removal of one accessory building, also, construction to begin
withing 6 months.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Adminsitrator
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
•
•
(612) 587 -5151
HUTIH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
1 ' HU7CHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 20, 1991
T0: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat of "SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAT"
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a preliminary plat and final plat.
HIS TORY
On February 27, 1991, Supt. Glen Hatejka, Hutchinson School
District, submitted an application for a preliminary and final plat
to be known as "SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAT ", located in Wagner Addition.
A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, March 19, 1991, at which time there were
neighboring property owners present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, will submit
certification that the proposed plat meets all the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per Preliminary
and Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned preliminary and final plat be approved as submitted
based on the fact it is the welfare of the city for school district
expansion. The vote was 4 ayes and 2 nays.
• Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
9 -/)1•
3 iIE m
I, - I
E*----*ANUE 1
FGA
-
LAURA AV N VE
CRAIG
3
3 4
AV ENUE
Is C Vt�
I,
- -- — — — — — — — — — — — —
3 1 S
K co,ls
cqlcfGo AVENUE CmErr
4
C LE ELA NG AVE%QE
THWAS AVENUE
zc� L. iA
A
- 2 -
GCTSEL
F• FT
V 3
5 sou7mvl
17 4
14
4
.. V.
AREA To
BE
PLATTED
"SCHOOL
DISTRICT
PLAT"
KAI STREE
LAURA AV N VE
CRAIG
3
3 4
AV ENUE
Is C Vt�
I,
- -- — — — — — — — — — — — —
3 1 S
K co,ls
cqlcfGo AVENUE CmErr
4
C LE ELA NG AVE%QE
THWAS AVENUE
zc� L. iA
A
- 2 -
GCTSEL
F• FT
V 3
5 sou7mvl
17 4
14
4
.. V.
I- -
Vr •r• .� I -' y..: '.1= :te Cr.i'r !'`!y! :,. %�i �(� „ -.� I.��'i P �_ ° t
I • I-
, . , 3 C 'E � E L N89 41'E `iT RE
0 --
�J
a
N o
N ,
v N
Q
2
V
u
q - 6 7
,
12
N•
--
-------
-
- -.—� -- ---� '---�
T �: Flo.
—
x•5.24'36-
q, 23
3
12 94
I
''63 2N'�92
24 '- - T - -- —
-
I
LOT
I
�OI
m \
ly 11
al
PARK
:
�
LL!
I
a-
6
N
I I
e0451_
569.5559•L . _
75.00'
I
589 ° 55 "59 "E
an
ko
Ld
t
r <o-j
q - 6 7
,
12
N•
- N c . -<..:r NW F/4 S 89° 55' 59" E
... _., r a.:/, 1. i5na.'p !m[a . . — ' SW c nt. T
c
D•a lnaSe a .
W' » "' 0 r.
. d`
0 4r °o.
The »r
CC�°fv.:
a E<4'-
9 -/+ r
_________I
I -- ---
- -.—� -- ---� '---�
T �: Flo.
—
x•5.24'36-
q, 23
3
12 94
''63 2N'�92
24 '- - T - -- —
-
LOT
-_
�OI
m \
ly 11
al
PARK
:
a-
6
N
I I
e0451_
569.5559•L . _
75.00'
I
589 ° 55 "59 "E
- N c . -<..:r NW F/4 S 89° 55' 59" E
... _., r a.:/, 1. i5na.'p !m[a . . — ' SW c nt. T
c
D•a lnaSe a .
W' » "' 0 r.
. d`
0 4r °o.
The »r
CC�°fv.:
a E<4'-
9 -/+ r
•• I y ' I �r I � =s � ' i
'� iFlr`Z - ,at � T. iJ i_�• IE : IS L : NGS
I ROFr' - iT> Z. +D b I :.00ITKN iROSF_RTS s
Q I V iy:JJ ,r 50 Len >rr•r 1F ✓•MeCN a: •I SrG
zz - x 1 Ne9'S 7'a1'E' •� ' "16.50
- 66LO6- N69 Al - E
1 _ "- .- ..
._ -661.0
_ 1
± :R.UI 13T.S8 ___ >e • - T'C29 -- r Sa.29 ___1 •+.•o
•s.:a ; 'i:ii - u29 lia iz
J
- r i• i
w' M +
7 :h 1 2 I _ 2 C,N.4W ro- {�_ _ o: _ _
8^ ••. Qf'wN a' - r ? _ - -? -! ^I^
M1- - —
STREET I
I _
- x499 --
GOEBEL
2 5 �q as - -16 SJDF rr 77-
r n
4 W
2 0 F F W 2 6
a
-9
= -
•939 ^ i9•]
4 20 e
4
.a .. _
9 22 15 2 cc - - 9 zz- - 19 3 f$
949 _ „ vJb I C 13 - - - _6 £1`E _ - 9LJ'
B 2g - 569':}]5 E- 2 � Z
c 6. € a cy . ob j 7 18 u 6 _ 2 Q
6 1 a,
tom' 5a.
o eo - ] S +, .d:.:E • n
n 769' %J E - - o5'a_a1E J + �T� •q H _ - 169 35 E- 1
7- ° �'O x'SZ —r°O >s 2 14 - 17 7 ••E .9a y o: >:
O /6'E•22'1' F _ "- q
9 E 1 -
- y 9 - %35E gg - } }`f + o3a yE 139'R yE • 1
9 .
a 6 a 29 2J IS 16
8 t 8 _ 2l i,: L2J_ d- 0 .2B • w _ d • 9 • w a 8
ar
- F •E as - � ^.'"... [ : - 22 y/ a ,2. E. _ :• � - f / _
o > 3 !
a J
y
82't- Qo (A� , 16 17
2 ni-. 4
`a n 6 G991 9COC BO 00 95 v e 19
<•$ 9 c I I _ 63••11 Jd - Z
_ 1 9 + • •J m 3 9 � w a � r5 0C '_>y AC � _.000 11 t 9C': '�+�. 2 ' 2 2 ' _ -5 y:.
25- _
1 x.,}09_ • _
6 N; se5 ` -9 E
999.5119' E
n
2 ;
-
V 10
a
- -
KAY STREET - '9 •,� =_
— J ScRoo L►
T -• °I' c j° 9
r ?:CG ,�?00 n X0000 �~ 1 00 OC _I .. '0000 _ - .• _• L:.JJ — _. ]J CE —
- '29. IS - Sc. rn rm. er Lf v9 •• SE's• ar Sw'.. a .>. n6 9, 9 ._ .
se... . G L••.o .• sc.;• >r s� ". 5 69.55 - E
9 -,,�,
2.52 Site Selection Considerations
New school site selection considerations will vary in emphasis and detail from those used in
assessing existing school sites as listed in section 2.4. Physical features of potential school
sites assume much more importance; space for the development of a school site must be allowed and
locations of the facility, outdoor activity and service areas must be well planned accordingly. A
school slte selection form or checklist may be put together using new school site considerations,
such as the following:
A. Size. Allowance must be made for the type of school programs, community uses, and future
Us Spaces for bus loading 'parking, outdoor activities, buffer and service zones, and
expansion areas must all be allowed. Experience in Minnesota, the recommendations of the
Council of Educational Facility Planners, International, and other states and national
nouns are the basis for the following minimum school site size recommendations
'Minimum
School Site Recommended Size
Elementary Schools
Middle Schools
Junior High Schools
Senior High Schools
Junior-Senior High Schools
Large Enrollment Campus (Elementary-
Junior High or Junior High -
Senior High)
10 acres
20 acres
25 acres
30 acres
40 acres
40.60 acres
PLUS
one additional acre for each 100 students
of estimated capacity Including possible
additions
For example, a 500 student elementary school should have 15 acres; a 1200 student junior
high, 37 acres; a 2500 student junior - senior high campus, 85 acres; and a 400 student K -12
combination, 24 acres. Special local circumstances (unusually high cost of land, lack of
availability of land) may have to be taken into consideration.
•�
B. ' Location . :The school site should be located near one or more of the following:
1) "' center of community or school district;
2) student population center or growth area (may be different than 1);
3) - community resources;
4) major and accessible roads, highways;
5) site expandable areas (preferably include in site purchase);
6) .y, where bus routes are limited to 30 minutes (elementary) and 60 minutes (secondary),
one way, when possible. ,
C. Health and Life Safety Avoid noisy, congested, environmentally hazardous areas (e.g.,
near heavy industry, sewage or chemical run -off basins, power and gas lines, railroads).
Provide safe, accessible entrance, loading and unloading areas, and egress to school for
student walkers, busses, service vehicles, and automobiles.
27 � M ,
RESOLUTION NO.
9450
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAT
WHEREAS, Supt. Glen Matekja, Hutchinson School District, owner
and subdivider of the property proposed to be platted as SCHOOL
DISTRICT PLAT has submitted an application for approval of the
preliminary and final plat of said subdivision in the manner
required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code,
and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described
lands in McLeod county, to -wit;
Replatting of the westerly portion of the WAGNER
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PLAT dated 7/88, and
replatted into what would be commonly known as the
SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAT described as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 of Block 6; Lots 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of Block 7; Lots 1, 2,
3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of
Block 10; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of
Block 11; OUTLOT A; the southerly line of Goebel
Street; all of Kay Court and that part of Eighth
Avenue Southwest lying westerly of the east line of
said Block 7 and its southerly prolongation; all in •
WAGNER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PLAT, according to
the recorded plat thereof. Also Lots 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6 and 7 of Block 1 of WAGNER DEVELOPMENT
CORPORTATION PLAT NO. 2, according to the recorded
plat thereof.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. That said preliminary and final plat of SCHOOL DISTRICT
PLAT . Is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in
accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such
certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit
required, shall be conclusive showing of
therewith by the subdivider and City officials
above described and shall entitle such plat to
forthwith without further formality.
execution of the
y Administrator, as
proper compliance
charged with duties
be placed on record
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
Paul L. Ackland •
ATTEST: Mayor
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
' (612) 587 5151
yv�cH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutch inson City Council
FROM: Hutchi Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R EQUESTED BY
HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WAGNER DEV. CORP. PLAT
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
. On March 3, 1991, Hutchinson School District, submitted an
application for a conditional use permit to allow the School
District to construct a 28' by 60' building for related special
program school improvements located in the present Wagner
Corporation Plat to be replatted to the School District Plat. A
public hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on Tuesday, March 19, 1991 at which time there were
neighboring property ownerspresent who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
• set forth above subject to the site being approved in April.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman 9
•,,,,�),inson Planning Commission
r
s
1
I%titt{tr It s,; I
, 9 . i I Intl I:r1• �►1 1
'•t 11.^.1['it t'�1� la'?O+119•'1 III :H( I lrrD'4 1% N•.+-.Y• rr..�r..tr •...sir
1 7 ( t I 1 •+o.•.. .� 711. .. ''''''''TT w r..mr i .
.. it N ... w r... /Y" ',.rN• •�w w'•�: ^ '1. ..'•� � ^ .
f
111 _
IF
. w Z 9,1 DARK . . ' ._.. .
Is
T
91
it 14 4
4 20
1 y
Of 13 ra r • t' Is +I t k
T:w .• "ti •• .�r
/ i �' _ �• "� • 10 { 1 t�3 u..r 1•.n
rrji > ,1., . less
1.4 .: a•Ir� _ It •� • tea• �•
�• � ".!I I 14 SI • i ♦ 11 1 . ~.. � I
:+ •rte. . \�: ..•v �i . .{��ii'!.T It
7 • ♦ .elf "' .1 y
1 , 'Y.. i• — .. /w �31 '}' �el•_ Tw.. 7{1 • .r. r. ` .r'.f 1.•t
: +
? s• .. ^'•.• 7 r a•
r ••� :i :� 1 .fit 1 T!S,� T —J•. ` �• + IF
•1 =•+ 3 tri D l�) 7 ��gl .7
Current Wagner.Development. Proposed change to school district plat #1.
Q nZ
0 RESOLUTION NO. 9451
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 28' BY 60' BUILDING
LOCATED ON SCHOOL PROPERTY
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, HNi
FINDINGS
1. Hutchinson School District, has made application to the
City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07 of
Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the School District to construct
a 28' by 60' building for related special program school
improvements located in one of to locations in the present Wagner
Corporation Plat to be replatted to the School District Plat or on
School Property with the following legal descriptions
Lots 1 and 2, Block 6 Wagner Development
Corporation Plat.
or
Lot 15, Block 7 Wagner Development Corportion Plat.
or
270' North of West Elementary School, 90' off East
Right of Way located in Part of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of
Section 1.
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted, based upon the findings set forth above
subject to the site being approved in April.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
ATTESTe
• Gary D. Plotz Paul L. Ackland
City Administrator Mayor
q_4-
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Ilk
7 HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350 WEST
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR REZONING AS SUBMIT BY
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC.
Pursuant to Section 6.06, C4, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for rezoning.
HISTORY
On February 22, 1991, Mike Degner, Hutchinson Technology, submitted
an application request to rezone property from R -2 (Residential
District) to I -1 (Limited Industrial Park District) located at
Hutchinson Technology Inc. A public hearing was held at the
regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 19,
1991, at which time there was no objection to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that the
request was appropriate for the area.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request to rezone be granted.
. Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
i� ( Y � �t N v .f� • 9 a
• �•i —Lx .., eMOPS C_�^ 1.Ok Veeee���� � 1 ♦ �s � _
w \ � is • f � f ��� �" � � wy . • � •�
1�� � i it v •Miu'yK.� J. •.• t • • `
L 37 • i •�.
T
I � �• Aar ♦. �w ♦x :.
1 iY�`f,Tn t�
AREA TO BE REZONED I -1 -
n
T
1 •
! ' 1
m .
`' , f
MYrINO L
/ N1Y]MLIII i f , N I , tom
IYOGY• Y00
f
�C
Naha. oNwlf asrmrN—
f
_71
IJ
0
•
0
(612) 587.5151
HUTCH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
_ HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY 3M CO
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a variance.
HISTORY
On March 4, 1991, Frank Mott, 3M Company, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a variance to reduce front yard set back from 50
• to 0' located at 3M Company, Hutchinson. A public hearing was held
at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March
19, 1991, at which time was no one present who objected to the
request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
variance be approved as set forth above due to the hardship of MPCA
mandates.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
• Hutchinson Planning Commission
T'
Q yF „
653
PP
Pi
♦f F
r lle
SAWCUT EXIST
EXIST, CANOPY TO BE REMOVED-- -
XIST. CONC. SLAB TO BE REMOVED
INSTALL MPORARY CONSTRUCTION
FENCE S' ti OM NEW BUILDING
fgNUC
C
r f \ MODIFY E T; FEI CE, OYIDE --
p+� \ RNER OST AND U END (SF FI
TO UI ING
INSTALL• ' OF GUAry7 RAIL T`l �1,;F
EDGE OF N \� NC. LAB,
RELOCATE NYDR BY MECN;•r
S " �'•
\\ ER�INAL ECTION
R �• �\
RE E EXIST. CONC. DRAI dE --
AS AND REGRADE TO Ek�
AS'RE
- REQUIRED. \
EXIST. FENCE EMAIN
VENT
I
630
•.\
r y
', 14
GP G
�.
\
� %
630
•.\
'�•:.
•/
..
633
°' � . ,•fir 4 ._;
�,
'N 0
ti
o
✓
NO M
SE TL. It
L TION
m
INSTALL
TIE NE C
INTO Y
IN
r
RESOLUTION NO. 9452
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO
REDUCE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 50' TO 0' AT 3M CO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Frank Mott, 3M Company, Hutchinson, has applied for a
variance from Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow them
to reduce front yard set back from 50' to 0' with the following
legal description:
Lots A, B, D, E, F, and Part of C Auditors Plat S 1/2 of
Sec 6- 116 -29
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for
a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be approved.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger
of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in
the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the
surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in
such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect
be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land
in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or
difficulty.
The application for variance for the purpose designated is
granted based upon the findings set forth above due to MPCA
mandates.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
• ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
City Adminsitrator
9- f
(612) 587.5151
HUTCy' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY 3M
COMPANY, HUTCHINSON
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
e On March 4, 1991, Frank Mott,3M Company, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a conditional use permit to allow the construction
of a new addition to building adhesive tanks located at 3M Company
on Hwy 22 S. A public hearing was held at the regular meeting of
the Planning Commission on Tuesday, March 19, 1991 at which time
there was no one present who objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
set forth above.
• Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman q — &'
Hutchinson Planning Commission
r \ d I"
E VE
VE
�' ✓� S
�\ REMOVE XIST PIPE LASE AND t �• ,
p ,\ PATCH T. T MATCl1 .� �� � + j
\\ � \r VENT
�-•� p �F \•\. SAWCUT EXIS IT, l • VENT
J Y • \ .
EXIST. CANOPY TO BE REMOVED J w
d'� \ ` XIST. CONC. SLAB TO BE REMOVED r •� +
y
x
INSTAL. MPORARY CONSTRUCTION . O
\\ "' FENCE S; OM NEW BUILOINO
\ \ J cpN uer
oi
• �•� :' I a ` ; .
J
I ♦ R
NST L A 0
�!.i `\ ♦ ; • f \ �`� yII P
REMOVE•,EXI ...FENC AT
'a /• \
BUILDIN G' DDI K �;• .: ' Qjq o
♦ JJ MODIFY E ` T:FENCE. OVIDE - LI?.9 '� - wr
OORHER DST AND SECU END V FENC CA \ .
TO ]No; \. �\ J- !y6 4.4.3. CDC
«. .
\
INS ' L" OF CVAReRAIL 7'A/ FR,A J • +� 4� �Y W�
\\ \ \• EDGE OF NE \ CONC. S
U PP \ .� RELOCATE NYDR BY MECN. \ " •' Vaq f f
TER4+INAL LECTION +' \ � ♦, \ � -n`O s5e e REM VE EXIST. CONC. DRAT NOS MI
FLUME AND REGRADE 70 Ek15T. C. a. \ 9
AS REQUIRED. •� O \ / � t;'�tp l' ATIG:7
•� J ,. \ J + •�i` . • /.'� INSTAL.^L //p
•� \
i
EXIST, FENCE MAIN r v 12^ ItilO Elfl
ib -0
Y G SPA c GO
r I
F4 -n '26 ' _1 6
ht +C,S' =. UU Z CONSTA VCT+' -•
� I
O30J4L 'i "3 S r
k 1 ' •�
1 41
I
r l +
±7.O
Pr.
I , I i l II l ,i 1'I' 'I� I �dYQ 'Fj�..
I f,' �tr��1 l�l;l 4� +IfLIo9R1a, n
I ,
1
i
a. y
r
". j.ff
� ` I
%C' 13
V4
T P Is
�f � �.�_.._�. -�.. _.ter.». - — ;- 'fi G h L.�4. i I � '�" �►'�>� �.>. r; t�
�. I •`;!� t , .., 7 4 �. a � 7 . ; f l y n l . , r:r�'
�,� , a Y.• �. � �I - ' ,L -@r li'; " i '' �1� •�`w, 4.. 1 tr ,4 ��P0. +.. �'f,�' r y� ' '(.�; .
�+ 4.,�.. ,1'1 t '�•! ,� d , ' 4✓, 1 r r� 4�1 ��. I _.�J� �� w +�'i q ic'd1���' �d �h
v J r I�..• ` 1 J yyyl _ ♦ d +,'i ,� AI Y, . } f k�� '
�� W' `�'^• I+ )� r j � + 'i� x { . � 1 }1 _ I.� 0, � rt .. + I I T�* I , �� ,l r.�'1 {r il�t,y M� ralj+'{•. • J +Sl 1�"y.�'� ii r.. : µdl � � ,�^
I
, 1 ,
e` }
A
y � �
rz--s
' /
•
`GAF
I ,
1
i
a. y
r
". j.ff
� ` I
%C' 13
V4
T P Is
�f � �.�_.._�. -�.. _.ter.». - — ;- 'fi G h L.�4. i I � '�" �►'�>� �.>. r; t�
�. I •`;!� t , .., 7 4 �. a � 7 . ; f l y n l . , r:r�'
�,� , a Y.• �. � �I - ' ,L -@r li'; " i '' �1� •�`w, 4.. 1 tr ,4 ��P0. +.. �'f,�' r y� ' '(.�; .
�+ 4.,�.. ,1'1 t '�•! ,� d , ' 4✓, 1 r r� 4�1 ��. I _.�J� �� w +�'i q ic'd1���' �d �h
v J r I�..• ` 1 J yyyl _ ♦ d +,'i ,� AI Y, . } f k�� '
�� W' `�'^• I+ )� r j � + 'i� x { . � 1 }1 _ I.� 0, � rt .. + I I T�* I , �� ,l r.�'1 {r il�t,y M� ralj+'{•. • J +Sl 1�"y.�'� ii r.. : µdl � � ,�^
I
, 1 ,
e` }
A
y � �
RESOLUTION NO. 9453
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION TO A BUILDING AT 3M CO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Frank Mott, 3M Company, Hutchinson, has made application
to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 6.07
of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow the construction of a new
addition to building adhesive tanks located an 3M Company, Hwy 22
South, with the following legal description:
Lots A,B,D,E,F and Part of C Auditors Plat S 1/2 of
Sec 6- 116 -29
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz Paul L. Ackland
City Administrator Mayor
1-k,
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• 37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: RATION ON F CONDITIONA USE G ERMIT RE UESTED BY TOM
DAGGETT
Pursuant to Section 6.07, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On March 4, 1991, Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg., Hutchinson,
submitted an application for a conditional use permit to allow him at
to construct a 70' x 240' building for painting and sandblastin
hearing
Hutchinson Manufacturing located on Hwy 7 West. A public
was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Cor, :mission on
Tuesday, March 19, 1991 at which time there was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a
conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned request for a conditional use permit be approved as
set forth above.
• Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
:e
m
ory
PARCEL A
. e...
u+
Q to
M
W
N
Q
W 10
VI
3 1
.u]
1 3
� On
^ n n
N Q N
N
sea•YOzrz
••- 126.00^
ANU
s �,�
... aO..
N 89. 51'00•E
1
A
on
FARCIM — 7 - 1
o
�n
N
.lf .i. /. ♦i. ].o
��
..rx
..ix
P_
-
�� •.
—
ST �� Y.n. o1 wghwl •.
PROPOSED
N SUILOING U '
N
nr of voY
5OU \ne1\Y N79'1\'30 -£
GPo.n<rn rtonc nrvr.r:pp
Z50
•.290 35...
0
W
•
t�0
S
si
�
PARCEL C
'^'
PARCEL D
J
O
:e
m
ory
PARCEL A
. e...
u+
Q to
M
W
N
Q
W 10
VI
3 1
.u]
1 3
� On
^ n n
N Q N
N
sea•YOzrz
••- 126.00^
s �,�
... aO..
N 89. 51'00•E
1
on
FARCIM — 7 - 1
o
�n
N
.lf .i. /. ♦i. ].o
��
..rx
..ix
P_
-
—
PROPOSED
N SUILOING U '
N
-
GPo.n<rn rtonc nrvr.r:pp
Z50
RESOLUTION NO. 9454
• RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 6.07 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO
ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 70'X 240' BUILDING LOCATED
AT HUTCHINSON MFG.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
1. Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg., Hutchinson, has made
application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under
Section 6.07 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to construct
a 70' x 240' building for painting and sandblasting at Hutchinosn
Manufacturing located on Hwy 7 West, with the following legal
description:
That part of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 117
North, Range 30 West of the 5th Principal
Meridian, lying between the southerly right of
way line of Minnesota State Highway No. 7 and
22, and former northerly right of way line of
the Minnesota Western Railway Company. Except
that part thereof lying east of the following
described line and its northerly extension.
Commencing at the south quarter corner of said
Section 36; thence northerly, along the west
line of said Southeast Quarter, to said
northerly right of way line of the Railway;
thence northeasterly, along said northerly
right of way line, a distance of 1056.54 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence northerly, parallel with
said west line, to said southerly right of way
line of the Highway and said described line
there terminating.
Also that part of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of said Section 36;
described as follows: Beginning at the
northwest corner of said Southeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter; thence easterly, along
the north line of said Southeast Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 252.00
feet; thence southerly, parallel with the west
0 lire" of said Southeast Quarter of the
9 �-
Southeast Quarter, a distance of 345.70 feet;
thence westerly, parallel with said north
line, a distance of 126.00 feet; thence
southerly, parallel with said west line, to the
former northerly right of way line of the
Minnesota Western Railway Company; thence
southwesterly, along said right of way line,
to said west line; thence northerly, along
said west line, to the point of beginning
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the
Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the
health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect
on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of
the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community nor will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards,
nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values, and
the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
The application for Conditional Use Permit for the purpose
designated is granted.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor .
0
11
•
(612) 587 -5151
='�HVrcH' CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: 'CON SIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY DR. BR UCE RANNOW
Pursuant to Section 6.05, B3, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
for a variance.
HISTORY
On March 4, 1991, Dr. Bruce Rannow, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a variance to reduce side yard set backs from 25'
to 20' and 50' to 49.04' located at 585 South Grade Rd. A public
hearing was held at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on Tuesday, March 19, 1991, at which time was no one present who
objected to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee
paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that there be
no recommendation on the request to City Council. Voting as
follows: 4 ayes, 2 nays and 1 abstained.
Respectfully submitted,
• William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
9- s.
0
CERTIFICATE OF
SURVEY for BRUCE
RANNOW
North 6ne of Lot
____ - -
- -- - 96.04
1
I
�
1
The east half of Lot 5,
E N V
Block 1, except the
I
j
east 50.00 feet thereof
o
P
and the east half of
�O
'•
p
O.
Lot 6, Block 1, except
�•:. ..o oo
a�
the easterly 60.00 feet
1 •.
•�•a -�
thereof and except the
6 ,
aa.os. ost
northerly 810.00 feet
thereof, as measured
CONCRETE SURFACE
'I
along the east and vest
lines thereof, all in
^`•
. ae
•.,, ��
HANSON'S THIRD ADDITION
ee
c... L. —. 9r2 4
e ehn
�I
r <.s. .r a.•...o..I
0
O
.4. 5 04 .p .e•.e .64 a•.a.
m
to
. t.r •a.. as u. •a.o
0.2. i.r• e•!• r.. •6o.0
_•10.00
L 0
.a•.• .a•.i .e•.a .6ai _ _f•.0 _a•a.
North line
of Lot 5 O)
.s._• .ear aa• .e..a a..a. sa.p.i 61.3.
0
M
.e•.• w.a. Ow.J• W
.a•.t
to v a•.a. Exlatlnq Duiltling
37 I LL
�� A4 CC FITNESS CENTER
in
WO
O
uy ixi Z Wn �M N
..eta •aJ.1 •64e 61.9• fa 0 0 t- eJ.• c•.e• iN p aJ.O•
OL
O
O X ® J 2
C O' ° 6�j•
44q.04 0 20
! ...
'4&.4 O u.s• 37 d p
.a•.t --__ 1L3.. as. b
M I •�N
N O � p P J
en
n in q 0 1 4
a. •••.ax.6a
�M .... a
.- -.- BENCH . sae MARK Top of curb of cotcn Dosin
Elevollon <1062.65
SOUTH GRADE ROAD
• d<natna e.nnnq fool me.oeon fy
s loan md.ole
0 S 30 60
� 6enotea Iron mnuswnt found
SCALE IN FEE) o ecnatee Iron ronument se t (1 Inca by 14 I I PIPS)
1 hereby cerilty that tala surrey was Pruyured oy as or unear aY dtrecl supervlslea�nOp;et 1 ew a hly
Paql stared Land 5u11eyor under the lea of the State el Nlnnaaota• Y.1.d n
V Pell l.n
... FP ^rJnIV 27 1991 p. gl s t' h
eticc No. 9626
:1
9- sl
lil) IIINSON HEALTH, FITNESS
A
V
l`nV i
HE CIfAGE
J1vAf.F_ AI'ARIN
T ,
--- - ---- -- ----
n I
y'
it O'
Td i
- - -
- -- - -
-- . --- - - - ---
lil) IIINSON HEALTH, FITNESS
A
V
l`nV i
RESOLUTION NO. 9455
RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 6.05 OF
ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464 TO ALLOW THE OWNER TO
REDUCE SIDE YARD SET BACKS LOCATED AT 585 SOUTH GRADE RD
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
FINDINGS
1. Dr. Bruce Rannow, Hutchinson, has applied for a variance
from Section 7 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to allow him to reduce
side yard set backs from 25' to 20' and 50' to 49.04' located at
585 South Grade Rd. with the following legal description:
The East half of Lot 5, Block 1, except the East
50.00 feet thereof and the East half of Lot 6,
Block 1, except the northerly 80.00 feet thereof,
as measured along the East and West lines thereof,
all in HANSON'S THIRD ADDITION.
2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the application for
a variance and has recommended to the City Council that the
application be approved.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed
variance upon the health, safety, and welfare of the community,
existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger
of fire, risk to the public safety, and the values of property in .
the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed variance upon
the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the
surrounding property, it is possible to use the subject property in
such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other aspect
be contrary to the intent of the ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land
in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining
property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to the
applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or
difficulty.
The application for variance for the purpose designated is
granted based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991. •
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Adm. Paul L. Ackland, Mayor 9
(672)587-5751
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
�J
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: Preliminary and Final Plat of "HOWARD'S ADDITION"
for a preliminary plat and final plat.
Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the
Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of
fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request
HISTORY
On February 27, 1991, Ward Haugen, Hutchinson, submitted an
application for a preliminary and final plat to be known as
"HOWARD'S ADDITION ", located on Hwy 7 East. A public hearing was
held at the regular meeting of the Planning commission on Tuesday,
March 19, 1991, at which time there was on one present who objected
to the request.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application and plat maps were submitted the
appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well
as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7,
1991.
3. Director of Engineering, John Rodeberg, will submit
certification that the proposed plat meets all the
requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance as per Preliminary
and Final Plat Data.
RECOMMENDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the
aforementioned preliminary and final plat be approved as submitted
noting that the development agreement between the Lutz Trust, Mr.
Haugen and the City be filed prior to the filing of the final plat
Votes were as follows: 6 ayes, 1 abstained.
Respectfully submitted,
William Craig, Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
V —/'
Al
It
E
STREET If
w
k
4
%
.
5
MICHIGAN STREET
t
AREA TO BE
PLATTED
"HOWARD'S
ADDITION"
PAUL:
` GRIN [`
MARK L
z
I GAqDE% 9CA:
7,
VZ
� �. ro • •• r et' l a
o .+
r
to � a. � 7 • ••
�,. .<, n f•• 1
-10�_ V`
.__....�_Wevt. ovvumedo<oanp
.. ..
i
_324.35 __ ....... Y -- - __. [Q'�
�
�n o,
AI�q�Tgm
OUdO�° vCILOCM bn6
4 GRAVEL SURFACE �I
._. .
o
r.00 oM
«
is w
BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION
I 240
.uof W.sl
v _
--�- - - - -!. OR VtL `
SURFACE . - I o �..•t J
a ? x
F
68 - - ---------
_ .. _ . _ -_... I
1 -6t - - - -' __
e6' I i
6 6 2 - -._. I ni nU
P ✓10 ,nq semOCa ^<' - .. ._. 60
_ 59. r M1
,
bra "l:q< Qn.l JI,Ii11 <], "'r
STREET AND, UTILITY EASEMENT
378.95
East
M
DAVID B.ARNOLD
GARY D. WDOWELL
STEVEN A. "DENSON
0. HARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. BOOS
LAURA E. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRGP.00ENANN
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSEPH M.PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
XULL& A.CHRISTIANS
RICHARD O.MCOEE
TIMOTHY W. PAPINSEI
February 18, 1991
ARNOLD & MCDow - FLL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARS PLACE
H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. James Marka
Building Official
37 Washington Avenue West
(� �IV
or oo0NSSL
CRARI.ES Y.CARNICHAEL
p IJAN M.0 ERON
SSSI CEDAR LAS ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. NJN7NZSOTA 55416
(612) 545
MN TOLL TREE 500-545"45
r AX(6L4)S45 -
501 SOUTH FOURTH STNEET
PRINCETON, MINT SOTA 55371
(G 12) 369 14
PAX (612) 3BC 5506
' f
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Northland Beverage Development Agreement
our File No. 3188 -89 -0133
Dear Jim: —�
I am enclosing and sending to you wha I sincerely hope is the •
final draft of the development agr ement between the various
parties concerning the Howard Prope y /Lutz Trust transaction.
A clean copy o this agreement will be ailable for planning
commission action next Tuesday evening. By carbon copy of this
correspondence,_ - am providing copies enclosed development
agreement to a e p anning commission, attorney Steve
Ward, Fred Lutz and his attorney.
I have received suggestions from both Steve Ward and Jack Regan,
most of which were incorporated in one form or another in the
agreement. As you can see, changes from the prior draft of the
agreement have been highlighted.
Some of the suggestions that were made by various parries were not
included, and I want to pass along my reasoning for not including
those suggestions. Of course, the planning commission and City
Council will ultimately have the authority to decide what is, and
is not, to be included in this agreement.
1. Denial of certificate of occupancy. Attorney Ward, on
behalf of at least two of the property owners, has
requested that we include language mandating a denial of
a certificate of occupancy for the Howard building if the
plat is not completed prior to May 1, 1991. I do not
recommend adoption of mandatory language. I recognize •
this is a fairly small point because the plat might very
well be complete by this Tuesday's meeting and if not,
FOR YOUR MfORMAnON.
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TNL11 SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCLTION 9 - / ' �
'CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAN SPECIALIST BY TILE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. James Marka
February 15, 1991
Page 2
certainly by the end of March. Nonetheless, I see no
reason for the City to "box itself in" when, for a
variety of reasons, it may not wish to hold firm to the
May deadline. on the other hand, the use of permissive
language gives the City the necessary "club" to get the
plat completed if the property owner should somehow not
finish the plat in a timely manner. Further, I am
concerned about creating a private cause of action with
other property owners and I see no reason for the City
to create additional headaches for itself.
2. utility and roadway concerns. Jack Regan raised a
concern regarding utility easements running along the
northerly most portion of the property and whether those
utility easements will interfere with the roadway access.
It is my understanding that utilities frequently cross
roadways, and in fact, must cross roadways, and this does
not present a complication or problem and therefore, no
• language has been included.
3. utility dedication. Steve Ward has requested that
paragraph 6 be amended to read "the City may require Lutz
Trust to dedicate the easements reserved by this
Agreement before further development occurs."' The intent
of his change is to make clear that utility improvements
may be installed long before Lutz is ready to use the
property. This change appears to be reasonable and
restates language elsewhere in the Agreement. I have
adopted his suggested language, but provided that the
dedication of the utility easements is subject to the
language regarding assessments.
I believe the rest of the changes in this agreement are as
discussed with representatives of the various parties.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD c ELL
40 G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosures
CC Council members
Steve Ward
Jack Regan
Fred Lutz
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into by Fred N. Lutz GC
Group Trust, Howard Properties, a Minnesota partnership, and the
City of Hutchinson this _ day of March, 1991.
RECITALS:
1. The Fred N. Lutz GC Group Trust, a Minnesota trust (Lutz
Trust) is the owner of the certain real estate by virtue of a
warranty deed dated January 10, 1985 and filed for record on
January 18, 1985 in the office of the McLeod County Recorder in
Book 197 of Deeds at pages 37 and 38, which property is legally
described as follows:
That part of Lot Twelve (12) of the Auditor's Plat of the
West Half of Section 32, Township 117 North of Range 29
West, described as follows, to -wit: Commencing at the
intersection of the East line of said Lot 12, with the
Southerly right -of -way line of State Highway No. 7;
thence West assumed bearing, along said right -of -way
line, 390.35 feet; thence South 130.00 feet; thence West
54.60 feet to the point of.beginning of the land to be
described: thence South 463.50 feet to the South line
of said Lot 12; thence Westerly along said South line,
892.37 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 12;
thence Northerly along said West line, 437.52 feet to a
point, distant 220.00 feet Southerly from the Northwest
Corner of said Lot 12; thence East 241.00 feet; thence
South 2 degrees Ol minutes 40 seconds West, 99.49 feet;
thence East 142.01 feet; thence North 268.60 feet to said
Southerly right -of -way line; thence Easterly along said
right -of -way line, for a distance of 60 feet, to a point
which is 870.35 feet West of the East line of said Lot
12; thence South 154.94 feet to the intersection with a
line bearing West from the point of beginning; thence
East to the point of beginning. (Identified as Parcel
No. 0040 on attached Exhibit "A ").
2. The Fred N Lutz GC Group Trust, a Minnesota trust ( "Lutz
Trust ") is the owner of certain real estate by virtue of a Warranty
Deed dated May 1, 1976 and filed for record in the office of the
McLeod County Recorder, which property is legally described as
follows:
That part of Lot Twelve (12) of the Auditor's Plat of the
West Half of Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 29
West described as follows, to -wit:
Commencing at the Intersection of the East line of said
Lot 12 with the Southerly right of way line of State
Highway No. 7; thence Westerly, along said right of way
line, a distance of 66.00 feet to the point of beginning
of the land to be described; thence continuing Westerly,
along said right of way line, a distance of 324.35 feet;
-1-
L
•
•
9 -T
. thence Southerly deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00
minutes, a distance of 130.00 feet; thence Westerly,
deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes, a distance
of 54.60 feet; thence Southerly, deflecting to the left
90 degrees 00 minutes, a distance of 463.50 feet to the
South line of said Lot 12; thence Easterly, along said
South line a distance of 378.95 feet to a point distant
66.00 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 12;
thence Northerly a distance of 593.50 feet to the point
of beginning. (Identified as Parcel No 0030 on attached
Exhibit " A " ) , except the; nortH' 293 feet of the ,above
3. Howard Properties, a Minnesota partnership, is composed
of general partners, Howard Haugen and Robert Peterson. Howard
Properties ( "Howard ") has purchased a portion of the property
described above in paragraph 2, which portion is legally described
as follows:
The North 293.00 feet of:
That part of Lot Twelve (12) of the "Auditor's Plat of
the West Half of Section 32, Township 117 North, Range
29 West" described as follows, to -wit:
• Commencing at the intersection of the East line of said .
Lot 12 with the Southerly right of way line of State
Highway No. 7; thence Westerly, along said right of way
line, a distance of 66.00 feet to the point of beginning
of the land to be described; thence continuing Westerly,
along said right of way line, a distance of 324.35 feet;
thence Southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00
minutes, a distance of 130.00 feet; thence Westerly,
deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes, a distance
of 54.60 feet; thence Southerly, deflecting to the left
90 degrees 00 minutes, a distance of 463.50 feet to the
South line of said Lot 12; thence Easterly, along said
South line a distance of 378.95 feet to the point distant
66.00 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 12;
thence Northerly a distance of 593.50 feet to the point
of beginning.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:
A. Howard shall complete and secure City approval of a plat
of the Howard Properties parcel. In addition to all other
statutory and municipal requirements, the plat shall dedicate a
total of 30 feet for roadway and utility easements. The easements
shall be located on the southerly most 30 feet of the parcel. Of
the 30 feet dedicated for easements, the southerly 15 feet shall
• be dedicated for utility purposes, as well as for roadway purposes.
The plat shall also reserve an easement for utility purposes on the
westerly 15 feet of the Howard Properties parcel. ft 1s understood
-2-
dedicated easements referred _to M in this ",paragraph:
B. Lutz Trust shall reserve the northerly most 30 feet of the
parcel described in paragraph 2 for easements for utility and
roadway purposes. Of the 30 feet dedicated for easements, the
northerly 15 feet shall be dedicated for utility purposes, as well
as roadway purposes.
C. Lutz Trust shall reserve the northerly most 15 feet of the
parcel described in paragraph l for an easement for utility
purposes.
D. It is understood that if the plat of the Howard Properties
parcel is not completed by Howard and approved by the City prior
to May 1, 1991, the City reserves the right to refuse to issue a
certificate of occupancy for the Howard building.
E. Lutz Trust agrees to reserve a roadway and utility
easement 66 50 feet in width and of undetermined length running
from Highway 7 into the parcel described in paragraph 1 above,
which easement shall be located between the parcels identified as
No. 0060 and No. 0080 on attached Exhibit "A ".
F. Lutz Trust agrees to provide a second access to the parcel
described in paragraph 1 above. It is understood at the present
time that it is impossible to determine the location of the second •
access. The access may be provided along the boundary between the
Howard and Lutz Trust property, may be provided by agreement with
other property owners or may be provided on property owned solely
by Lutz Trust.
G. The City may stet require Lutz Trust to dedicate the
utility easements reserved by this agreement until before further
development occurs, sub }ect, however; to ;;the _provisions of
paragraph H of this Agreement.: No further development, sa or
lot splits of the property described in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this
agreement shall occur or shall be permitted to occur by any of the
parties to the agreement, until such time as a plat of both parcels
is prepared showing the second access and until all other
requirements of appropriate City ordinances are met or as Lutz
Trust and the City shall otherwise agree. Nothing ;in this
H. This Agreement does not bind any party to pay for utility
and other municipal improvements. It is understood that utility
improvements may be installed in advance of formal platting of the
property. Any expense for municipal improvements will be
determined based on a subdivision agreement or by assessment
against benefitted properties pursuant to Minnesota law as provided
in Chapter 429 of Minnesota Statutes and appl3cable`;case law. It •
CS,ati- Tnnt'hP_a'ssessed for the.cost
-3-
0
•
J. This agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their
successors and assigns and shall run with the land.
Dated:
Dated:
Dated:
Dated:
FRED N. LUTZ GC GROUP TRUST
By
John P. Thavis, Trustee
HOWARD PROPERTIES
By
Howard Haugen, Partner
By
Robert Peterson, Partner
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of March, 1991 by John P. Thavis, Trustee for the Fred N. Lutz
GC Group Trust, and acknowledges that he executed the above on
behalf of the Group Trust as the free act and deed of the Trust.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF MCLEOD )
Notary Public
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of March, 1991 by Howard Haugen, Partner and Robert Peterson,
-4-
I. All easements either dedicated or reserved by virtue of
this development agreement shall be dedicated to the public at no
the time of platting or, nstal?latiori.,
expense to the City.
Partner, of Howard Properties, a Minnesota partnership, and they •
acknowledge that they executed the above on behalf of the
partnership as the free act and deed of the partnership.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged fore me this
day of March, 1991, by Paul L. Ackland, Mayor and Gary, D. Plotz
City Administrator for the City of Hutchinson, a municipal
corporation, and they acknowledge that they executed the above on
behalf of the City as the free act and deed of the City of
Hutchinson.
Notary Public
CONSENT
Citizens Bank & Trust Company, as mortgagee on the Howard
Properties parcel as set forth above does consent.to the Agreement
and agrees to subordinate its mortgage to the Agreement.
Dated: CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY •
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF McLEOD )
On this day of March, 1991, before me, a Notary Public,
personally appeared the of
Citizens Bank & Trust Company to me known to be the person
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged that he executed the same as the free act and deed of
Citizens Bank & Trust Company.
Notary Public
This Instrument was Drafted By:
G. Barry Anderson
ARNOLD & McDOWELL
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Telephone (612) 587 -7575
Attorney I.D. No. 196X
-5-
RESOLUTION NO. 9456
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF
HOWARD'S ADDITION
• WHEREAS, Ward Haugen, Hutchinson, owner and subdivider of the
property proposed to be platted as HOWARD'S ADDITION has submitted
an application for approval of the preliminary and final plat of
said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under
the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly
had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City
Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State
of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described
lands in McLeod county, to -wit;
That part of Lot 12 of the AUDITOR'S PLAT OF THE
WEST HALF OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH, RANGE
29 WEST, described as follows:
Commencing at the intersection of the east line of
said Lot 12 with the southerly right of way line of
State Highway No. 7; thence westerly, along said
right of way line, a distance of 66.00 feet to the
point of beginning of the land to be described;
thence continuing westerly, along said right of way
line, a distance of 324.35 feet; thence southerly,
deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00
• seconds, a distance of 130.00 feet; thence
westerly, deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00
minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 54.60 feet;
thence southerly, deflecting to the left 90 degrees
00 minutes 00 seconds, a distance of 463.50 feet to
the south line of said Lot 12; thence easterly,
along said south line, a distance of 378.95 feet to
a point distance 66.00 feet west northerly a
distance of 593.50 feet to the point of beginning.
Except the south 300.50 feet thereof.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
1. That said preliminary and final plat of HOWARD'S ADDITION
is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and
conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the
City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such
certification upon said plat by Mayor and Cit
required, shall be conclusive showing of
therewith by the subdivider and City officials
above described and shall entitle such plat to
forthwith without further formality.
execution of the
y Administrator, as
proper compliance
charged with duties
be placed on record
. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
9 -T
Gary D. Plotz, City Adm Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
W/ (612) 587.5151
FCITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY PETE KASAL, (2
MILE RADIUS) LYNN TWP
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the sketch plan.
•
•
` LYNN
TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH CODE -5 RANGE 30 WEST
•CCL[• 1..4E 11 TwP
:. CI :(w p, y :f :: .: s :[ (_ nJa f.n v•. NI[ uvx: a(f rn • }�s I +f - Y';L _ �.E�H .
pP CC Ml[ Hw ♦ )
>rj. T I, Iw:a •y�v3N�I LI _�.`LI I M_1y_ � •T !F 1 r
T AST%, A l e�Jrw � L 6 1 -�„
� a dcw.
�° P � I P••[ L 6 . 6 � ' :s "`-, r 5 r62 _ 1 � �� � � Y rh.. �_aLOLBKr � Lu w r Of'!.: 't,- \ \ \, \�
U.UtEN 6
1 'XOiT 'rl>a.�(.,E r06 IMCLA IVEG"NE '54 2025 epPCr Z 'MJ>CNwSOVL\
` I P Af L MO
r -94 •' I 16J It SJ a KG»I T' _ • r . \. \ \\,�\
{T L[rl.:. ?. ..{ „['•: alY Y_FITN PVS:JI I{ �' My41N d L1LL
C •d
• • ( • �_4 IA�NS. - •N f�((� ,1 12J Iw.uY• KrmCAr I S OCN.LJ a � �\ \ \, \ \\`\
Ila `j 1[wE] uRLeS V f s Y•�[ ,aws<.c:•w (KR I RKN1F0 u4t f[u e
y 4[wu
]2] .120 _ I' ! If QC C
,) U✓ £
I = .. L �.r Lfr • I... 9ClaC 6 ��' 1.1 ]]: •C w ,p„ I •' � wK/.• ±• (c
�� - ° �iC v..E P _LEEi rgmFJ a O. •�/ L � r ° EJ j5 S MP ( I
ZGFrS
. 'S: �L.. 1 L
,. Xrin(1ER , NCxOLJtlI 20 SC ir eorr-
S6 ZED 262 I > I 2001 .a na ^, 2 �- •C� 90 12r SO'
e• i 6 O' So EfE ( L? Vxs CNS •IPEGNT
ynv'� F' 8 a FtSGN •�, 2CC EO Ifl'. • 9`.) 4w ' rc
ESi EPn0E1i �z LLLA N7 ` IPETTWN - 12 I 0' fi` k 2e,. 15 [sa:[ ca SON 160 ' li� . - 3 - eD a N 1CO.LLD �„ L'I f • 'S R48 w
li 'L' "i[i[Rr nEJRwG 1TppiEN G•�+Pl[v a y, PL•ISJ,C ^ • A I PC9ERT a f0 : C
.• f EE 0?F+ • [u NN< G` e( :Ti I •E LA CFrK IOfa L AA,.J ' • N l O[E:f9f7 REA[q e I- p! RUI-`J a Ra:n FRAU E%RL690N. K � •.. 9 SJ a G n 2� ® ®Vy 1.0 a6_ l �22C " JLSON rrlU _.
Si 9 )� ,w GAGS 14Lfh M_5 w1 I
12925 x '� BO ` �• RO CLPI w _ T! b I I K
'*•� I F �T_ 9 3 - �..S.Up[ ,+?
ff wLPP <T O TD Cn
< vw C - 0 l 5n Rti1 .a•�.1' J�r:C
f1 . P.0 + ` i K T J+ �. �:F w .RLns f r _ an
E _
! L • v WJFT• n`..YLN .s ' ^L\ I UGENE d
•-
i �` t �0. I �V ♦ + ©sa«
EO
-r ` •••sr
. ('. ELNEi
c .aE'tuuw'd I G.. ::•,.
I• ,^ to so �.I /•� J }.�/ /L}/{� _ IAdx ads aTx Ina .rmnf. jr
,r< ?'LLl ZEf •.t•r.L _ ' (• ( Y(NTE \S 60EU0 LSE r .rfP JE
1
t 'wCS.E• fJn: 1 40 �� 7 110 i • ED
to
EV 1£95' . I`J tPO 4 LITTO £0 'e, ,.SGN I)C Oto a RI
+ 4C'Jn.L R S :* • 'J w L t l C STn E Yl.l 1ESEY € LT.E a! I y
IwIL 16y:a DEAN ' c1 � aER:ra' ELNEPn y
'_ __ dC "•., L IREVE dACaSON r:NNES awry. a0 I Now Is:
.P.[ • _ r' CT:L J aY.[) RLWL`JI
GK. =L • ESt I �1 _ • 1711 ! •S, + 6 _ 'I F ��viwa�• =I `� •Si .l
I p J•..__E IaJ / ' -_ 160 •K,TS.N Ous
_
xurs
zES :I .,}, d• KL L ••u..i KLL.
(; •' "wi�_: - 1 ( a s:L:E oft \ 2 T6[ IN'ORE"°L w �✓.J
B �
LT
!i of K%iT ••
•K • we: <c.^,'a _ rea.65' .u:N aOR Pw a :z :a'
rLr;:E I UJ' S �G y � •[ ' [ 11 ` OLCSJN J•
61��, �r�T
�s wGCn .r� -6J rd �]SP /I\ -c / / 1CMKl �J� 2•C £EYT2 EO AJ6�
COLLINS IPIZE 9) • TwR
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
, a
wa
NE corner of NW1/4 of Sec. 1
t
Cast Iron monument
r� , R. 30 w. West, assumed bearing S 89 °46' 16 "W
T 116 ...421.00._ ... .. -.183.00-
-' 140.001 - 170.00-
o .. 1 1 I o
i
0 I -�
0 0 `
L O
o
o � I I I IIr �
cn rn I ,
i 1
1 I
303.00- _
s;
I � 1
I b
I
1 HOVS
C i y5/r j �tf
1 HOUSE j •
" rn
I
GARAGE ! 0
Mz
Cr
o
3 ^+ L HOUSE
O � h
V GO I BARN I I
O 4)
o tD
I w w
CO v 1
w
I C O I
1
i
SHED z 3 w z r
� 1 N
* I
MACHINE SHED' 1 M
1
Origincl oounoor,• ling
f _ � 50
50 i ----- --- ---- 554.00- - -- = —� - --
w
o_
325.58 -- ..
---- 6 6 2. 8 6
c,�t
0
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: Roland Ebent, Clint
Gruett, Craic Lenz, E1Roy Dobratz, Tom Lyke, Dean Wood (10:00 p.m.)
and Chairman Bill Craig. Also Present: Building Official Jim
Marka, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City Attorney Barry
Anderson.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Dobratz made a motion to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting dated Tuesday, February 19, 1991. Seconded by Mr.
Gruett the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF "NORTH OAK RIDGE"
SUBMITTED BY KEVIN COMPTON
• Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:35 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4204 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary
plat to be known as "North Oak Ridge" located in
Helland's Addition.
Chairman began the hearing by reading correspondence from
Mr. Scott Peterson, 1265 7th Ave NW, and paraphrased
objections to the plat.
Building Official Marka commented on his not being aware
of that property as designated park land.
Director of Engineering John Rodeberg commented on the
changes recommended to limit the number of trees taken
down and stated the new drainage proposal would reduce
impact of storm water.
Building Official Marka stated the developer is working
with the City Forester to preserve trees. Mr. Kevin
Compton, developer of the property, commented on his
meeting with the Forester.
• Mr. Marka stated the concerns of Utilities with
easements. All is in compliance with the zoning
ordinance.
1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19/91
There was discussion on drainage to the cul de sac.
Mrs. Shari Colvin, 735 Shady Ridge Rd, concern with
drainage into her lot which is in .back of the
development. Mr. Rodeberg suggests Lots 3 and 4 be
dedicated with walkout basements. Discussion followed on
the placement of 2 catch basins currently not on the
plan.
Mr.
Ebent made a motion to close the hearing, seconded
by
Hr.
Lenz the hearing closed at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Ebent moved
to
recommend approval of the preliminary_ plat subject
to
staff recommendations of March 5, 1991 as follows:
1.
Walk outs approved at plat time.
2.
Verify setbacks at rear on cul de sac.
3.
Name proposed for cul de sac.
4.
Soil boring report required.
5.
Park land previously paid with land.
6.
Park board approval required.
7.
Addresses to be on Final Plat
8.
Plat to show garage slab elevation not top
of
block.
9.
All trees 8: in diameter or greater shall be shown.
10.
Reduce Carolina St to 32' and add radius
at •
corners.
11.
Hydrants to be approved by Fire Marshal.
The Utilities issue regarding rear yard easements is to be
addressed. Lots 2, 3, and 4 in Block one are to be designated for
walkout type homes only. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried
unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY MARVIN WILLHITE ON
465 HIGH ST
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7:47 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4205 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for the purpose of considering a variance
requested by Marvin Willhite located at 465 High St.
Building Official Marka commented on original request in
1984 and the ordinance changes later denied for lack of
hardship. An option open would be to build an unattached
garage and the conclusion or best option would be to
process a variance and add an attached garage. He also
commented on the - removal of one accessory building on the
property.
•
2
HUTCHINS014 PLANNING COM14ISSION MINUTES
• 3/19/91
There was discussion on number of accessory buildings on
the property and also the fact the construction is to be
begun within 6 months and the applicant should be aware
of the proposed zoning ordinance if work is not completed
by that time he would comply with the new ordinance.
City Attorney Barry Anderson recommended notifying Mr.
Willhite by certified letter regarding the 6 month time
frame and the removal of one accessory building.
Mr. Lyke moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lenz
the hearir:g closed at 7:53 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion
to recommend approval contingent on removal of one
accessory building also, construction to begin in 6.
months. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF "SCHOOL
DISTRICT PLAT" SUBMITTED BY HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7,55 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4206 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
• request is for the purpose of considering a preliminary
and final plat to be know as "School District Plat"
submitted by the Hutchinson School District.
Atty Neil Jensen, representing the School District,
commented on the plat and proposed park. He stated the
proposed park was favorable to city staff. There was
discussion on the size of the proposed park as opposed to
the present park.
Director of Engineering John Rodeberg commented that
fewer lots developed would mean a smaller park size is
necessary. Atty. Jensen stated the property is more
usable by the school with the park being moved from the
present site. Discussion followed on the cash
contribution and the land donation at the time of the
Wagner platting.
Supt. Glen Matejka commented on park contributions as a
school district. Mr. Rodeberg noted that park dedication
has been made by the school district in open space for
the public.
Supt. Matejka commented on accessibility to the school
• property.
3
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19/91 .
Discussion followed on the timeline of developing the
platted land and the additional required land necessary
as increase of students are on the property. Mr.
Rodeberg explained the requirements of the state so far
is to have more land space for additions to either of the
schools.
Mr. Joe Wesley, 560 Larson St., had questions as to the
need to replat property, availability of proposed park
verses accessibility of the present park. Director of
Engineering Rodeberg commented on the park from the
standpoint of Wagner plat now the new plat. He explained
.the park would better serve the remainder of the Wagner
property plat. Building Official Marka stated needed to
replat as related to assessments for the present local
property owners.
City Attorney Anderson explained the County Recorder
requires replatting rather than vacating the streets this
is a legal requirement. Atty. Jensen noted the plat had
been replatted already within the Wagner Development.
Discussion followed on the plat itself. Atty. Jensen
commented on the need for more property by the school
district. Supt. Matejka commented on the possibility of •
more students in the Middle School in the future.
Building Official Marka commented on future planning for
the school district. There was some discussion on the
community growth. Mr. Marka also commented on the amount
of park land in Hutchinson and accessibility of t he
parks.
Kevin Cowles, 1115 Goebel St, voiced his concerns and
opposition to the plat. He stated he bought the his lot
in the Wagner plat because of the park and its size.
Nancy Anderson, 1055 Goebel, also voiced her concerns
with the park relocation for small children and
questioned the property values if school bought the
property.
Supt. Matejka explained, if at a future date a building
would need to be constructed the infrastructure would be
an inhibiting factor.
Mr. Cowles commented on the ratio the State requires of
students to land.
Mrs. Brian Brosz, 685 Kay St., stated her concerns were
the same as the other neighboring property owners. •
4
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMF;ISSION MINUTES
3/19/91
Brian Brosz asked what Hutchinson's commitment was to a
park system.
Mr. Marka stated there was no written commitment and he
explained the policy of the developer when it comes to
cash contribution and land donation.
Discussion followed on the taxes on the properties and.
the Wagner property subdivision agreement with the
present property owners.
There was discussion on the assessment policy and the
policy of the city deciding where parks are to be
located. Director of Engineering Rodeberg commented on
the city budget cuts and that parks would have no
development in the next 5 year plan. City Attorney Barry
Anderson advised the city not to improve the park if the
school district would plan to develop the property.
Discussion followed on the protection of option for both
the school district and property owners. There was also
discussion on the long range planning for the school
district and the logical area for the school to expand
• and how much area the school would need to expand
Supt. Matejka explained the property boarders school
property and the school has looked at many options. The
whole plat will be sodded and used and ball fields.
Mr. Lenz made a motion to close the hearing, seconded by
Mr. Gruett the hearing closed at 8:55 P.M. Mr. Lenz made
a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary and
final plat as submitted for school district expansion.
Seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried. The vote was 4
ayes and 2 nays by Mr. Lyke and Chairman Craig.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
HUTCHINSON SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WAGNER DEV. CORP. PLAT
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8:57 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4207 as published the HUTCHINSON
LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The request is for
the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to
allow the School District to construct a 28' by 60'
building for related special program school improvements
located in the present Wagner Corporation Plat to be
replatted to the School District Plat.
• Supt. Matejka commented on the need for a smaller
5 '
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19!91 ,
building to house B -10 special education students
outside the school building. He stated the School
District preferred option - Lots 1 and 2, Block 6 in
Wagners Plat. Discussion followed on the access to
utilities for each option.
There was discussion on the type of students and ages of
students in the facility. These students have
emotional /behavioral disorders and are 4th - 9th grades.
Building Official Marka commented on the possibility of
deferring the decision on the proposal one month.
It is the consensus of the Planning Commission to
approve the conditional use permit and approve the site
in April recommending that Lots 1 & 2 Block 6 in Wagners
Plat be excluded in the decision as not an option due to
neighboring property owners concerns. Discussion
followed on the use of the building in the summer. Supt.
Matejka stated the building would be used during school
hours and school year.
Mr. Dobratz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Lenz the hearing closed at 9 :25 p.m. Mr. Craig made a
motion to approve the request subject to the site being •
approved in April. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion
carried unanimously.
(e) CONSIDERATION TO REZONE FROM R -2 TO I -1 REQUESTED BY
HUTCHINSON TECHNOLOGY INC.
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 9:26 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4208 as published in the
HUTCHINSON LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for considering a rezoning of property from R-
2 (Residential District) to I -1 (Limited Industrial Park
District) located at Hutchinson Technology Inc.
Chairman Craig abstained from discussion of the request
due to conflict of interest.
Mr. Mike Degner, Hutchinson Technology, explained the
rezoning of the property and the project. Building
Official Marka explained that property of more than 5
acres does not need to be platted.
Mr. Lyke moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Dobratz the hearing closed at 9:32 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a
motion to recommend approval of the rezoning. Seconded by •
6
HUTCHI14SO24 PLANNING COA114ISSION MINUTES
• 3/19/91
Mr. Lenz the motion carried with one abstaining, Bill
Crain.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY 314 CO
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 9:33 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4209 as published in the
HUTCHINSON LEAD on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for considering a variance by 314 Company to
reduce front yard setback from 50' to 0' on Hwy 22 S.
Mr. Frank Mott, 3M Co., introduced the Engineer from 3M
St. Paul, who presented the proposal and background on
the building.
There was discussion ion Hwy needs in the future. Mr.
Mott commented on permits issued by MN DOT. Discussion
followed on the hardship of the property. Mr. Mott
stated the hardship is that MPCA mandates the underground
storage tanks to be removed.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke
the hearing closed at 9:43 p.m. Mr. Lenz made a motion
• to recommend approval of the variance due to the MPCA
mandates as a hardship. Seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion
carried with two abstaining votes, Mr. Gruett and Mr.
Dobratz.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY 3M
CO
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 9:44 P.M. with the
reading of publication #4210 as published the HUTCHINSON
LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The request is for
the purpose of considering a conditional use permit to
allow 314 Company to construct a new addition to building
adhesive tanks on Hwy 22 S.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Lyke
the hearing closed at 9:45 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a motion
to approve the request. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion
carried unanimously.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY TOM
DAGGETT, HUTCH MFG.
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 9:46 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4211 as published in the
40 HUT CHINSON LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
7
HUT CHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES •
3/19/91
request is for considering a conditional use permit
requested by Tom Daggett, Hutchinson Mfg., to allow him
to construct a 70' x 240' building for painting and
sandblasting at Hutch Mfg.
Mr. Daggett explained the changes from the previous two
requests and presented a photograph showing placement of
the building. He also commented on drainage.
Building Official Marka commented on the hard surfacing
of parking and outside lay down area.
Mr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Lyke the hearing closed at 9:55 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a
motion to recommend approval of the request. Seconded by
Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE REQUESTED BY DR. BRUCE RANNOW
ON SOUTH GRADE RD
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 9 :56 P.M. with the
reading of publication #4212 as published in the .
HUTCHINSON LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for considering a variance by the owner to
reduce side yard setbacks from 25' to 20' and 50' to
49.04' located at 585 South grade Rd.
Building Official Marka commented on the history of the
proposal being part of the ShopKo relocation project. As
the new and old zoning ordinance state 11" is incidental
but requires a variance. He also stated the catch basin
proposed would take care of drainage. Mr. Marka
explained the hardship would be the narrow lot for
commercial.
City Attorney Anderson commented on the relocation
issues. He stated Dr. Rannow has accommodated the
relocation procedure, also, that this is a reasonable
request.
Discussion followed on the procedure and possible
violations of procedure followed.
Building Official Marka explained the property owner's
position. Dr. Rannow stated his business would suffer
because of timing in the construction.
City Attorney Barry Anderson explained the timing and •
this property owner's response from the city. He stated
EJ
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19/91
Dr. Rannow has made prior efforts to relocated his
business. He suggested a public policy issue would be to
pass on the decision to the City Council.
Mr. Dobratz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Lenz the hearing closed at 10 :15 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a
motion to send the request to City Council with no
recommendation. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion
carried with one abstaining vote by Mr. Wood due to the
fact he was not at the entire hearing. There were 4 aye
votes and 2 nays, Mr. Lenz and Chairman Craig.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF "HOWARD'S
ADDITION" SUBMITTED BY WARD HAUGEN
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 10:16 p.m. with the
reading of publication 114213 as published in the
HUTCHI14SON LEADER on Thursday, March 7, 1991. The
request is for considering preliminary and final plat of
"Howard's Addition" located on Hwy 7 East.
• Mr. Ebent asked to abstain from voting as he is a
neighboring property owner.
Building Official Marka commented on the earlier proposal
and the platting of the property.
City Attorney Anderson commented on the easements and the
properties to the West. Mr. Marka commented on easements
and the subdivision agreement is to state easements on
the remaining property.
fir. Ebent voiced concern with the Developmental Agreement
between Lutz Trust /Haugen /City. He suggested to record
the agreement prior to the recording of the plat.
City Attorney Anderson explained the agreement and the
issues yet to be addressed with the Lutz Trust attorney.
14r. Lyke moved to close the hearing, seconded by 14r.
Wood the hearing closed at 10:30 p.m. Mr. Lyke made a
motion to approve the preliminary and final plat provided
the development agreement be filed prior the filing of
the final plat. Seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried
unanimously.
• 4. NEW BUSINESS
V•'
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19/91
(a) UPDATE ON LUTZ /HAUGEN AGREEMENT
This item was covered in the previous public hearing.
(b) DISCUSSION OF TOWN AND COUNTRY TIRE PARKING SPACES
Building Official Jim Marka commented on Mr. Elliott's
intent to meet the present variance. He stated there are
two changes in the site since the variance approval as
follows: 1) the whole area may not be hardsurfaced 2)
there are changes in the building plan.
(c) DISCUSSION OF CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FOR14ER BURGER
KING SITE TO R -2
Mr. Lenz commented on the unfilled hole on the property
to the North of the convenience store leading to Council
discussion to rezone the property back to R -2
It is the consensus of the Planning Commission to direct
staff to begin rezoning to R -2.
(d) DISCUSSION OF URBAN EXPANSION DISTRICT •
Building Official Marka commented on the joint meeting of
the County /Twp /City on the urban expansion.
Mr. Gruett will represent the planning commission at the
next joint meeting.
(e) REVIEW OF PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE
Building Official Marka explained that because of
budgeting the city does need to look at raising fees. It
is the consensus of the planning commission to set a new
fee schedule for review by the commission.
(f) DISCUSSION OF AL CHRISTOPHER GARAGE ON JUUL
There was discussion of the trees in the back yard as the
reason for needing a variance to construct a garage.
Staff was directed to research past garage variances as
to approvals and rejections.
There is to be more discussion in April on this item.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY PETE KASAL, .
LYNN TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
ito]
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
3/19/91
Mr. Lyke moved to recommend approval of the sketch plan,
seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
5. O LD BUSINESS
(a) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE
Building Official Marka suggested the City Council review
the proposed changes with the Planning Commission or
Planning Staff.
(b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
None.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
11 :05 p.m.
•
E
11
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 22, 1991
MEMO
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM:GARY PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR & KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
The budget cuts from the directors have been received and are
attached. Summarized are the cuts they are proposing. It is very
difficult to judge the reports. As you will also note the cuts did
not come to the anticipated dollars needed for the required
• $160,000.
BACKGROUND
What is becoming a yearly event in the State of Minnesota is a
revenue short fall which is affecting cities during their budget
year. An $80,000 cut has been past into law and will cause our
local government aid monies to be less than budgeted. The memo
from the Department of Revenue has made note of another cut
possible for the December 1991 settlement.
We reviewed this with the City Council at the February 26•workshop.
At the workshop we presented the proposal of cutting $160,000 from
the 1991 budget. It is anticipated this is the maximum loss of
revenue which would occur in this year. Actual cuts will not be
known until the legislature completes its work. Some people are
estimating this could take as long as July or August, making cuts
at that late date becomes extremely difficult. If we find the
cuts for 1991 exceed the $160,000 it would be suggested the dollars
come from the General Fund unreserved fund balance. We would, of
course, look at other alternatives but the fact the budget would be
so far in the year cuts would be very difficult to find and
implement at such a late date.
DISCUSSION
General Fund reductions have been given by each director after they
have reviewed the detail with their staff. Cuts proposed by the
•
respective departments did not meet our criteria of $160,000. A
1
V,
look at additional cuts were then added by this department. The
effect of the cuts would allow us to make the necessary $160,000.
It would also NOT cause a loss of permanent positions. Some of the
proposed cuts are also of the nature to get us only through the
year.
In our cuts as presented the contingency line of the General Fund
remains in tact. Therefore. we could adjust 1991 wages to the 4%
as most units of government have done. It becomes difficult to
make a decision on this and /or merit increase implementation,
until after the 1991 legislative session concludes.
As you recall we did pass the $58,000 along to taxpayers this year.
Tax statements have yet to arrive but the increase is sure to be
felt. In addition some significant changes in methods of computing
assessed value are being discussed. Over all the taxes will be
closely scrutinized for next year.
Improvement projects with larger portions paid by the general tax
levy need to be looked at very carefully. Adding items to the
bond issue rather than from the general fund budget also increases
the tax levy, however this is outside the present levy limit. If
the levy limits do come off, in 1992, it may put us in the unusual
position of deciding just how much tax the city wants to levy.
OTHER POSSIBILITIES •
In adjusting for this years cuts we did not reduce monies for some
programs which perhaps will be closely scrutinized. We offer the
following comments:
Youth Center - discussion has taken place which does question how
effective is this program. It would appear we have an excellent
person operating the program but the youth participation will need
to be evaluated prior to the 1992 budget. We of course are
expecting a major fund raiser to operate this program for this year
($12,000 is expected from "other "). The $23,000 from the general
fund may be very difficult to keep in tact for next year.
Historical Society - Our contribution which did decrease by $1,000
in 1989 to the 1991 budget of $4,000. It may need to be
eliminated. A report from the Historical Society perhaps should be
invited before the City Council to report on how the dollars are
being expended from the City. With such a report a better decision
can be made.
Arts grant - We did commit to three years on this program but
perhaps other sources of funding may be found to at least partially
off set our contribution. The cuts proposed would be only delaying
as we would budget in 1992 the $10,000 and be sure our commitment
is fulfilled 1992 would be the last year of the program. We will •
want to be monitoring the reports on the activities and financial
K
• activity of this program.
DEPARTMENTS
Departments with concern - we expressed concern about the
effectiveness of our school liaison officer program. Perhaps
because of the newness this is true but a close look may be
necessary. We also are finding the K -9 program is expensive to
operate. While without question a beneficial program it may
require more financial resources than can be afforded.
Community Development - it is very good to have a person who is
available to put the community's best foot forward if a company is
looking for a new location. The materials background ground
information and Minnesota Cities "Star City" designation is very
good. But the number of new plants being located especially during
the austere 1990's may mean that the "opportunities" to recruit new
plants to the Minnesota and Hutchinson area are limited. A major
LGA cut in 1992 may require other staff people, namely city
administrator, finance, and planning to take care of this function.
The scaling back will bring each and every department under close
scrutiny do we want to do what was done in the 1980's. The street
maintenance and park maintenance costs may cause us to look at
reductions in these areas. This while looking at the expansion of
streets and parks as the community grows.
• We have however been doing positive things to insure our dollars
are well spent. Insurance and the LMC program has brought us a
benefit and financial savings. A self- insurance health care and
dental program seems to be working well after a shaky start but is
bring a cost containment factor to the City of Hutchinson despite
the spiral inflation cost of health care.
We have also been sharing resources. A county /city relationship
with our emergency services personnel appears to be working for the
benefit of everyone. The same we believe can be said for LOGIS.
Our computer system is working well and keeping us updated and the
need to work smarter and faster is being aided by these systems.
RECOMMENDATION
To meet our $160,000 budget cuts it would be the recommendation of
asking the City Council to accept the cuts as presented under the
proposed plan. The proposed cuts give us the ability to get to the
next budget cycle. 1992 will be difficult as the direction of the
city will need to be more fully addressed.
We should also at some point in the near future have a full meeting
of all personnel to discuss the future. A lot of rumors are
circulating and should be put to rest. We should also talk about
sources of funds. Tell our employees how the downtown land
• acquisition projects can move ahead while the City is facing
financial problems in the General Fund. A discussion of Liquor and
3
Water /Sewer Funds needs to also be addressed. How it is important •
to keep them in line with the General Fund program to keep harmony
among the employees.
With the budget reduction in place we must remind the City Council
and the Citizens of the Community of the impact such reductions
have. Reduced service levels will be felt. We will not be able to
respond as fast or do what had been done in previous years.
Expectations must be lower. At the same time the employees are
willing to take the extra effort and bear a little more of the
responsibility to insure the community still can be a proud
community.
With the cuts in place we feel we are well positioned for any
futher adjustments for 1991 from the State of Minnesota. When the
Governor and Legislature finally agree to the reduction we may then
be able to reinstate some of the reductions if the cuts are not as
severe as we anticipated. It would also be at this time we would
be reviewing with the City Council the cost of living adjustment.
The City Council agreed to this review when the 3% Cost of Living
was put into affect in January. We will also be placing on hold
until this time merit adjustments which had been agreed to by the
City Council at the time the wage plan was adopted, until after the
legislative session.
Finally the budget adjustments from the Liquor Fund and Water /Sewer
•
Fund are included. It is important to keep all funds in step even
though, because of the nature of their operations they are an
independent operations.
We recommend the adoption of the proposed cuts by Chuck Nelson of
the Liquor Fund in the amount of $5,975. The proposed cuts of the
first level by Randy De Vries in the amount of $61,750, would also
be recommended to the Mayor and City Council.
C�
U
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
1991 GENERAL
FUND
• SUMMARY OF PROPOSED
BUDGET CUTS PER
DIRECTORS MEMOS
WITH ADDITIONAL
CUTS RECOMMENDED
PROPOSED
ADDITIONAL
CUT
CUTS PROPOSED
(DIRECTORS)
TOTAL REDUCTION AMOUNT FOR
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
855
ELECTIONS
100
FINANCE
5350
MOTOR VEHICLE
100
ASSESSING
UNDER CONTRACT
CITY ATTORNEY
PER AGREEMENT
PLANNING & ZONING
5000
DELAY OF
ONE YEAR THEN 2 YEAR
SPREAD
BRARY
CONTRACT
LICE DEPARTMENT
23800
FIRE DEPARTMENT
0
TEMP WAGE
2000
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
SEE PD
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
SEE PD
BUILDING INSPECTOR
500
SAFETY COUNCIL
NOT AVAILABLE
FIRE MARSHAL
250
ENGINEERING TEMP WAGES
4000
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
3850
STREETS & ALLEYS - PAINT SPRAYER
3500
DOORS
7000
MAINTENANCE ACCOUNTS
0
1991
TOTAL
NECESSARY
160000
160000
159145
159145
159045
159045
153695
153695
153595
153595
153595
153595
153595
153595
148595
148595
148595
148595
124795
124795
124795
122795
122795
122795
122795
122795
122295
122295
122295
122295
122045
122045
118045
114195
110695
103695
103695
103695
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
1991 GENERAL FUND
1991
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED BUDGET CUTS PER
DIRECTORS MEMOS
WITH ADDITIONAL CUTS RECOMMENDED
PROPOSED
ADDITIONAL
TOTAL
CUT
CUTS PROPOSED
NECESSARY
(DIRECTORS)
CEMETERY 0
103695
DUST COAT ROADS
2250
101445
CITY HALL 0
101445
101445
PARKS & RECREATION ADMIN ALL DEPT 53640
47805
(PER PAGE 3)
47805
RECREATION DEPARTMENT ABOVE
47805
47805
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER ABOVE
47805
47805
CIVIC ARENA ABOVE
47805
47805
PARK DEPARTMENT ABOVE
47805
47805
RECREATION BUILDING ABOVE
47805
47805
CELEBRATE 1990
47805
47805
AIRPORT 0
47805
TANK MAINTENANCE
'' ? ? ? ??
47805
TRANSIT
47805
47805
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 474
47331
47331
ENERGY COUNCIL 0
47331
47331
S.C.D.P. COORDINATOR 150
41181
47181
DEBT SERVICE UNAVAILABLE
47181
47181
UANLLOCATED
47181
CHRISTMAS LIGHT
5000
42181
(SET ASIDE BEGINS IN 1992)
ARTS GRANT
5000
37181
(BALANCE OF $5,000 IN 1992)
ROOF REPAIR - OLD FIRE BARN
6000
31181
(COST TO BE INCURRED BY LIQUOR FUND)
VECHILCE RENT
31181
0
(CAUSES DELAY IN PURCHASE OF SOME VEHICLES
0
BECOMES A ONE TIME SAVING ONLY MUST BE
0
BACK IN PLACE 1992)
0
0
FUND TOTAL
0
0
0
11
M E M O R A N D U M
March 13, 1991
TO: Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Budget Reductions
CITY ADMINISTRATOR BREAkDOWN BUDGET %
Full -Time (3) & Part -Time (3/4) $155,879 96.16
Operating 6,230 3.84
The above percentage breakdown shows that any large cut would
require a cut or reduction in personnel.
Regarding the operating expenses, 3.84% of budget, I suggest the
following reductions be made.
• Line
Item
4320
- Travel
• Line
Item
4401
- Dues
• Line
Item
4409
- Miscellaneous
FROM
TO
$1,700
$1,200
980
800
350
175
There is no capital outlay in this budget
/ms
9
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
March 21, 1991
MEMO
TO: GARY D. PLOTZ CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: BUDG REDUCTIONS - 1991
Upon review of the 1991 budget the following is offered as possible
cuts for this year.
Over time 150
Copy machine /office
supplies /dupl. suppl. 1,000
Data processing 1,000
Travel Conferences 200
Machinery & equip. 3,000
5,350
EXPLANATION
OVERTIME
Money was set aside in anticipation of some needed overtime. We
will forgo the dollars and if necessary use compensation time.
SUPPLIES
We are always looking for the best possible price in addition we
will be more selective with some of the items which we have become
accustom. Since this budget affects all budgets for supplies and
the major copy machine we will be impacting other departments.
We also want to make the City Council aware the used of recycle
paper (currently a 50/50 blend) has cause our paper costs to
increase over past years.
DATA PROCESSING
While our LOGIS billing cost have increased we will be looking at
being more effective in this area of our budget. Reports will
have to be curtailed and we will try and work smarter. This is an
(612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
H E H O R A N D U M
DATE, March 21, 1991
0
0
TO: Mayor and Council
FROMt Motor Vehicle Dent. - Dorothv Smith
SUBJECTc BUDGET ENHANCEMENT AND REDUCTION
4200 Reduce Office Supplies $50.00
4220 Reduce Repair and Maintenane 50.00
Revenue - Start charging for phone calls to State Dept. for the
public. Up to now we have called in for people with problems at
no fee - a public service minimum per call - $1.50.
area where the City has been working in a consortium to make us
more efficient and cost effective.
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We were hoping to add a computer to better operate in a more
efficient matter. A wait of one year is possible with this
equipment.
TRAVEL SCHOOLS CONFERENCES
We are budget for the following:
Minnesota Finance Officers Conference $400
League of Minnesota Cities Conference 425
Meetings & Training - General 475
We believe it is important to retain this part of the budget. With
the tight funding and the many changes being discussed by the State
it is important to find how potential ways to solve the problem.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
I requested staff to propose what they would cut from the budget
and the following responds were received. ( Not all staff
responded):
1. Increase water shut off rate to $25.00
2. Increase assessment search fee.
3. Extend payment time to save postage on number of delinquent
notices sent
4. Increase fees overall.
5. Discontinue policy of no garbage charge when gone for winter as
Junker still is paid.
6. Require proof of eligibility for reduced garbage rates.
7. Increase fees for public hearing on planning commission to cover
staff cost as well as direct cost.
8. Increase fees for gambling /Bingo /Cigarette licenses plus
permits.
9. Cut down on number of hours for parttime people
10. Close monitoring of office supplies do not use or make copies
unless necessary.
11. Charge employees minimum amount for coffee
12. Plan meeting and conferences so food need not be served and
hold in city owned building to eliminate rental costs.
13. Eliminate unnecessary schools and conferences.
•
•
0
TO: Kenneth Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: Ron Kirchoff, Sergeant �K
DATE: March 13, 1991
RE: Budget Reduction
In reviewing the 1991 budget plan with Chief Steven Madson we
believe we can reduce approximately $23,800 from the projected 1991
budget expense. We believe this can be accomplished without
seriously affecting service or programs presently in effect. The
following areas of the Hutchinson Police Department budget would
be affected.
Line item 4112 "Overtime to Regular Employees" would be one of the
areas greatly effected. It is estimated that approximately 280
hours can be reduced. This would be in the area of proposed
training, range and also would effect staff restructuring.
• The next area effected would be line item 4120 "Wages of Temporary
Employees ". The reduction in this area was started on January 1,
1991, with the reduction of Sharon Zieman's hours. She went from
three quarter time to half time. In restructuring of staffing on
shift we have reduced the amount of overtime hours that was being
generated by Officer Mark Shoutz and the canine unit. As noted in
the year end report we are going uncovered in certain areas where
we believe it is not practical to bring in a part time person or
pay overtime. This will show up again as a savings in overtime and
part time salaries.
Other areas of the budget that would be effected are line item 4320
"Travel, Schools and Conferences ", 4311 "Postage ", and 4340
"Printing and Publishing ". These areas can be very closely
scrutinized, several conferences can be omitted to add to the
overall reduction of the budget plan. It is hoped that by
conforming to these reductions that an estimated $23,800 can be
trimmed from the 1991 budget.
Any further cuts would effect personnel and programs presently
operating. The department feels that our School Liaison program
deserves the highest prioritization of programs. The true value
of this program will only begin to become a realization with the
passing of time and /or the implementation of various programs
directed towards the youth in our school systems. The Canine
. program would be the next guarded position as we feel that to the
overall policing philosophy that the Canine program is very
beneficial not only as a deterrent in would be criminals but in
apprehending criminals and officer safety.
Ken Merrill, Finance Director
March 13, 1991
Page 2
On the far end of the spectrum the program that may be incorporated
into an overall city program to show cost savings would be the
maintenance person position. It is believed that by utilizing
volunteer and specialty help such as sentence to serve, senior
citizens, etc. this position could be temporarily maintained by a
maintenance supervisor. Of course this would have to be in
cooperation with Park and Rec Director Dolf Hoon who shares
responsibility for our maintenance personnel.
The large question on the horizon again dates back to the
feasibility study being conducted as to whether or not the
Hutchinson dispatch center can be merged with the McLeod County
dispatch center thus eliminating the need for our line item on
salaries for dispatchers. This area will need to be answered in
the very near future. Some of the questions that will be addressed
will be the cost savings versus any anticipated costs that the
county will incur if they assume the dispatch responsibilities.
It is my belief that this question will be answered in April 1991.
/lkg
CC: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
91 -07 -0002
0
•
i
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
March 21, 1991
Kenneth Merrill
Finance Director
City of Hutchinson
Dear Mr. Merrill,
I am sorry to report that the Fire Department will not be able
to cut any money from the 1991 budget at this time. With building
maintenance going up, personal equipment wearing out faster than we
planned, fire calls up again this year and a constant need for
better and specialized training, I have no area to cut.
I am sure you are aware we have a budget committee that
scrutinizes the Fire Department budget before it gets to the city,
so we have a true bare bones budget.
• We do have an idea for revenue generating in 1992, if you are
interested. It is minimum housing inspection on all rental
property with a fee for the yearly inspection. I would be willing
to go over our idea with you when convenient.
Sincerely,
Brad T. Emans, Chief
Hutchinson Fire Dept.
BTE /bb
0
(612) 587.5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O
DATE: lurch 5, 1991
TO: ✓Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: James G. ?larks, Building Official C� (Y)
RE: 1991 Budget Adjustments
In reviewing the Building Department and Planning Department Budgets I find that
no extra funds are available. On the contrary, I foresee extra wage funds being
necessary just to cover basic services. I an hoping extra revenues will cover
this cost.
There is $5,000.00 in the Planning Budget of which, unfortunately. I'm sure will
end up being spent on adoption of the Shoreland Ordinance (mandated).
Capital Expenditures has $0.00 budgeted.
s
Conference and Schools is necessary to maintain continuing education certification •
requirements.
There has been discussion over the years with Administrator Gary Plotz, of moving
the Planning Commission files upstairs along with one secretarial staff.
Presently, I believe Bonnie is carrying overflow amongst downstairs staff and has
Fire Department responsiblities in addition to her duties as Planning Commission
Secretary.
John and I are attempting to centralize our file system, hopefully eliminating
duplication.
As you know, the outlook for growth development in Hutchinson appears to be
outstanding for 1991. I have attempted to eliminate as much non - essential work,
and quite frankly, I feel we are now at bare bones in regards to staffing. At
present, I am very uncomfortable with our inspection program and plan review
programs. Follow up of correction is non - existent, and no-calls on inspections
are an every day occurrence.
JCM /pv
0
ff 12) 587 -5151
TY OF HUTCH/NSON
SHINGTON AVENUE WEST
INSON, MINN. 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 11, 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
As you requested to give in order of priority the following; least
important first.
1. Overtime wages has never been in my budget.
• 2. Temporary wages has been dismissed during the first round of
budget decisions.
3. Capital expenditures was reduced to $250.00 which is
insignificant and not practical to remove from the present
budget.
4. Travel school and conferences has been cut by $700 from the
original proposed figure. I personally believe it improper to
reduce this area any more, considering the importance of
staying up -to -date.
In regard to additional revenues, there is Article 4 of the Fire
Code that has not been adopted by the City in the past. This
Article deals with permits for operation of certain businesses. It
is commonly regarded as an expensive system to administrate by most
jurisdictions and thus not used, or adopted. In essence an
additional Operator's tax for some businesses.
If the fees were set high enough for such permits by the Council,
to more than cover administration, this area could help in the
revenue area. I have talked to Brad about this, and our opinions
are that it wouldn't be well received or popular with the
businesses affected.
0 If you have any questions please call me.
GFF /bb
March 4, 1991, Budget Adiustments
IFI (612) 587 -5151
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: March 19, 1991
TO: ✓Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Kenneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
RE: Budget Cuts 1991
As requested, I have again reviewed the Building and Planning Department
Budgets and have the following recommendations:
1) Reactivate Building Permit Fees for the Downtown Revitalization Grant
Program.
2) Reevaluate our Comprehensive Plan on the Park Land and sell off parks that
can not be facilitated or are to expensive because of assessments.
(is: Wagner's Dev.)
3) Eliminate the $5,000.00 from the Planning Budget for adoption of the
Shoreland Ordinance and submit a resolution to the State deferring
adoption until 1002 funded. Keep in mind, this is mandated and 502 funded. .
4) Delay the purchase of another car, thus maintaining vehicle rent.
5) Eliminate $500.00 from Travel School and Conferences. I am cautious about
this because of my continuing education requirements necessary to maintain
certification.
6) RRaise fees on public hearings for variances, conditional uses, platting,
rezoning, etc.
7) Experiment by eliminating city financing of infrastructure development to
see if private developers will emerge.
8) Offer an additional weeks vacation up to 5 weeks after 12 years of service
versus the 1.82 1991 cost of living adjustment.
Please keep in mind that 912 of the Building Department's budget is staffing
salary and benefit cost. Staffing is presently insufficient for services offered.
I would appreciate consideration by the City Council and Administration to review
the balance of services, costs and staffing.
JGM /pv
(612) 537 -5151
+'HU7CN' CITY OF HUTCHIN a
�s
37 WASHING TON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, M!NN. 55350
H E H 0
DATE: March 6, 1991
TO: 1 - - genneth B. Merrill, Finance Director
Gary D. Plotz, Ci_y Administrator
FR014: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: 1991 Budget Adjustments
Engineering/ Street /Maintenance /Cemetery/City Hall /Airport Departments
In looking at potential budget adjustments within the 1991 Budget, there appears
to be very little room for maneuvering. The four areas requested for re ,view are
discussed below:
x f xx• �
• A cut of $4,000 (to S12,200) may be workable. Our coverage of projects
may be negatively affected, creating tie potential for a decrease in the
quality of construction.
L WI NWIR rr
This item was significantly reduced already from last year and may be low
at its current amount.
x w •� n � A-r r
This budget is insufficient as it currently exists, to provide recommended
and /or required training, continuing education and technical certification
requirements. I believe this budget item should have more funding, not
less.
»A;
If, and only if, an IBM computer is provided with the Storm Water
Management Plan through City Bonds, instead of through the budget, the
$3,303 for the PC Workstation and WordPerfect can be deleted. The tu,e
files, S^3, are required sooner or later, but can be d layed for a year.
i i A1ID AI MS (20 )
. '1EM ORARY WAGS
Budget is currently marginal to insufficient.
BUDGET9I.ADJ /JPR /March 6, 1991 AGE 1
CM Mr f ,s"S 0
Budget is currently marginal to insufficient.
77 VFW.. SIMOOL XRD CDi 'E
Budget is currently marginal to insufficient.
CAPITAL KKPM1 TMJRFS
The Paint Sprayer purchase can be i 'layed a year, providing a temaorary
s4vings of $3,500.
Y'ATUTMIAHCE ( 21)
Budget is currently marginal.
Cw F,TM Y (47)
Budget is currently marginal.
CTTY HALL 09
Budget is actually reduced this year. No reductions noted.
Maw 'r ( 51
No reductions noted.
The Professional Services for Engineering (18) relates to the Storm Water
Management Plan ($25,000). It is imperative that this process continue, but it
should be paid through City Bonds instead of the Engineering Budget. A com;uter
and software for Storm Water Management should be included in the project, as
well as additional funds for Storm Water Utility Fund set up. This three year
project requires an estimated $25,000 to $35,000 of funding in 1991.
There has been some discussion of the Clothing /Uniform requirements. A review
is recommended to determine if some departments need uniforms, if shirts only are
a possibility, or if purchase of clothing is an option.
Doug Heier, La..ry Karg and I have spent several hours reviewing our budgets, line
item by line item. We met for two hours earlier this week, and besides what is
noted above, have no additional reductions which we feel can be made.
I must st ronsly emphasize that we really labored last year to provide a
conservative, bare bones budget for 1991. There is no fat in the budget, and any
further reductions will make it impossible to keep up our current level of
service. In fact, with the growth of the city street and infrastructure system,
we already are having to reduce our service levels just to be able to cover the •
additions to the system.
BUDGET9I.ADJ /JPR /March 6, 1991 PAGE 2
The Engineering Department itself utilizes shelving and files constructed by Cal
or Marlow., a ) ight table constructed by Harlow, army surplus drafting tables and
inefficient equipment and facilities. We are years behind in inventory, index
maps, record drawings and standard detail drawings. The AutoCAD syst_m was a
tremendous step toward the future, but without the time or additional facilities
required to collc ..and input the required data, we will continue to fall behind.
Thi City should b: proud of the staff of these departments for their dedicated,
efficient service. As noted in my previous personnel /salary review, the City
also is conservative when it comes to personnel and salary levels. Further
budget reductions therefore could have potentially severe results.
BUDGET REVIEW (PROPOSED CUTS)
L:GINEERL G (18) - TEMPORARY WAGS S 4,000
PR•?FESSIONAL SERVICES $25,0O0
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (computer, files) $ 3,850
STREETS /ALLEYS (20) - CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (paint sprayer) $ 3.500
TOTAL $36,350
ONLY if included in the G.O. Bonds for Storm Water Management Plan,
computer /software, Storm Water Utility Fund setup.
2 ONLY if computer is provided with Storm Water Management Plana
• REVENUE EUMUXEMT AND TRANSFER RECOHMENDATIM
1. Set up Storm Water Utility Fund A.S.A.P.
2. Set aside a portion of Plan and Specification Fees for Engineering
Revenue. Current $50 fee should be increased to $60.
3. Raise Assessment Search Fee to reasonable rate.
4. Raise Engineering Expense Fee another 2% to reflect actual expenses more
closely.
5. Review and adjust Wastewater Discharge Permit Fees, increase transfer to
Engineering Budget.
6. Transfer MnDOT's payment of Downtown Snca Plc.iing to Street Department,
not General Fund( ?).
7. Transfer Sweeping Revenue to Street/Maintenance Department. Department
currently earns significant income from sweeping 3M, HTI, Biscay and MnDOT
properties. Cu,-rently goes to General Fund( ?).
S. Review and adjust Planning Fees, transfer a portion to the Engineering
• Department.
BUDGET9I.ADJ /JPR /March 6, 1991 PAGE 3
9. Copy Fees (Blueprint, Large Xerox) should be transferred to Engineering
Department to help pay for maintenance and repair. Raise to actual price.
10. Transfer Planning Secretary upstairs. Delete temporary secretary
position.
Again, I can not emphasize too strongly how austere our current budget is. There
are no discretionary budget items included. I would like to review current
re•,enue sources, adjust fees and transfer these funds to their proper department.
I also recommend reviewing other User Fees (i.e., Storm Water Utility and
Maintenance Utility, Variance, Conditional Use Permits, etc.) to offset potential
propei:'Ly tax increa
Th_uzk ; for your careful and thorough consideration.
JPR /pv
file: Budget Engineering - 1991
CC: Mayor and City Council
0
•
BITDGE91.P.DJ /JPR /March 6, 1991 PAGE 4
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Ken Merrill, Finance Director
FROM: Dolf Moon, Director of Parks & Recreation
DATE: March 11, 1991
RE: 1991 Budget Reduction
As the process begins to reduce the City of Hutchinson's 1991 Budget
by $160,000, I would like to address and comment on the process.
As the 1991 Budget was put together, I felt our department presented
a budget that was conservative and had addressed a minimal amount of
growth. It has been hard to look at ways to reduce when the public's
expectation for our programs, facilities and services is at an all
time high, and they would like us to do even more.
• Another area that has been elluded to is quality of life which Hutchinson
residents appear to desire, judging by our community growth in the 80's.
My hope is that we are able to keep this department going forward in
the 90's.
In conclusion, I hope the economic impact our department offers to the
community is considered as it relates to the potential reduction of
dollars within our department. Rest assured, there will be a continued
effort to explore all funding sources to insure program and park devel-
opment growth for the future.
klm
• City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Deparhnent
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Prurted on mcilded 11aper -
. 1991 BUDGET
Proposed Reductions
1991 Park & Recreation $987,327 21.3% of city budget
Park & Recreation Breakdown
Full -time
480,983
48.7%
Part -time
160,245
16.2%
Operating
346,099
35.1%
$987,327
100 %
Temporary Wages
Cut Tree Dump
992
hrs.
X
$4.25
$4,216.00
Gardener
600
hrs.
X
$4.25
$2,550.00
Scoreboards
400
hrs.
X
$4.25
$1,700.00
Laborer
260
hrs.
X
$4.25
$1,105.00
Laborer
133.88
hrs.
X $4.25
$ 569.00
Baseball Coach
320
hrs.
X
$2.50
$ 800.00
•
$10,940.00
Any reductions of temporary wages in Recreation, Senior Center, Civic Arena and.
Recreation Building would greatly inhibit our ability to run programming and
would limit the number of hours facilities are open. As it is, the reduction
of $11,000 included in this report will hamper our effectivemness for some
aspects of recreation programming (i.e. field maintenance, repairs). Another
aspect of our temporary wage earners is work study which we depend on quite
heavily for Civic Arena and Rec Center personnel. The past two years have
shown it is increasing harder to get students, let alone quality individuals
to work. We must be constantly aware of the status of this program. As the
Technical College is not immune to budget cuts as well.
Overt Wages
The 1991 budget includes $600 in Recreation and $250 in the Parks Department.
Those dollars may be cut if necessary; they are already substantially cut from
the 1988 level of $4,553, 1989 level of $1,592 and 1990 level of $1,005; $959
of which was in Recreation, specifically the swimming pool. All department
heads will need to monitor their specific areas.
There are no provisions to include overtime for full -time personnel in the 1991
budget, but its accumulation will be for emergency services only (i.e.
• mechanical repairs, storm damange, flood control and snow removal). The use of
comp time will continue to be encouraged even for emergency situations.
TRAVEL SCHOOL CONFERENCES •
The 1991 budgeted amount is $2,300 of which $125 has been expended through
Janauary 31, 1991. Items which the department has taken part in include:
*Tree inspector workshop (3 people)
$200
*Herbicide Pesticide Applicator license (3 people)
60
*Pool OPerators Certificate (1) ($95) registration
170
*N.Y.S.C.A. Certification spent $35 **
100
Central Leisure Services spent $90 ** no overnight
200
League of Cities Workshop One day
20
M.I.A.M.A. Conference
300
Minnesota Society of Arboriculture
200
Minnesota Recreation Park Association (2 people)
600
Sr. Citizen Workshop
80
Sr. Citizen Conference
95
Travel Expense Sr. Tours
175
Miscellaneous
100
$2,300
*Certification Requirements
* *Spent 1991
This budgeted expense involves up to 13 department employees, I feel we could
reduce that amount by $600. I an uncomfortable cutting any dollars out of this
line item, due to the direct benefit our community may receive relative to
cost saving ideas, innovative programming, grant information, legislative
involvement and staff development.
CAPITAL OUTLAY
The 1991 Park and Recreation budget includes $43,100 in capital expenditures
which represents 12.4% of the departments operating costs. Below is a
prioritized list split three ways including items that could remain, that can
be split and that could be cut, and also comments explaining items as needed.
Remain
5 $ 500 Gym Equipment
4 $ 600 Hockey Nets
3 $ 800 Electrical Update
2 $1,000 Rescue Board
1 $1,200 Exercise Equipment
$4,100
program expense gymnastics
operating expense
last year of three year program (Farm Show pays
half of $1,600
safety item
United Way funded
L 1
Capital Outlay Cont.
Page two
E
•
SPlit
Keep /Cut
5 $600
$600
Tables -Arena
4 $200
$400
Weed Whip (1)
3 $500
$500
Drainage
2 $750
$750
Grass Seed
1 $4,000 $2,000
Trees
$6,050 $4,250
Cut
8 $ 700 Vacuum head /poles
7 $1,000 Park benches
6 $ 500 Chainsaw
5 $1,500 Prairie Grass
4 $1,000 Volleyball courts
3 $5,000 Restroom
2 $15,000 Playground
1 $ 4,000 Computer
$28,700
revenue producing rentals
could trade three old machines
Linden Park Recreation Programming
Tartan Park repairs
too late for spring boulevard planting program
split $2,500 Trees $1,500 community gardens
can hold off
should have been included with chemicals
Will need in 1992 2nd year cut
cost versus benefit warrants further research
recreation programming may need if program grows
Baseball Association will push for alternative
funding
second year cut
would enhance our ability to schedule - create
promotional fliers, save cost on brochure, time
management would benefit; would be compatable
with City Hall accessories
Many of the items listed will reappear in future budgets if they are cut. My
major concern with capital expenditures will be how we address long range
development as it relates to the park system growth.
LINE ITEMS
Two items in the Park Department budget that can be considered for reductions
include:
$4,000 chemical mosquito spray
$5,000 Roberts Park concessions
The impact of no mosquito spraying is quite apparent. A reduction in concession
will have a corresponding reduction in revenue.
�J
Page three
REDUCTION SUMMARY
Temporary Wages $10,940
Overtime 860
Travel, Schools & Conferences 600
Capital Outlay 32,260 - $38,300
Line Items 9,000
TOTAL
% Reduction
Part -time $160,245
Operating $346,099 min.
max.
Overall budget 5.43%
6.04%
$53,640 - $59,690
$11,790 .73%
$41,850 12.09%
$47,900 13.83%
53,640 Cut
59,690 Cut
As one can imagine these potential reductions will have a substantial impact on
the Park and Recreation Department with the most dramatic affect in the park area.
The exact impact on the delivery of services is unknown at the present time, but
potential reduction of 20% of the park staff in the summer will greatly affect the
production level city residents have been accustom to. As well as having an
affect inter departmentally in how program services are delivered.
Other relationships with organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce, Mainstreet •
and youth service organizations may also feel the impact of these cuts relative
to the prioritization of services and their need for city assistance.
In terms of the loss of capital expenditures, these items will need to resurface
at a later date and we will need to address how growth and development will occur
in the future.
Revenue
The 1991 Budget included revenue enhancement totaling $12,240 which were tied to
many items that may possibly be cut. With most of our fees set for 1991, we would
be hard pressed to generate additional revenue.
•
Many of the groups that use our facilities are dependent on contributions from
service organizations. Without their contributions, these programs would
probably be looking toward the city for funding of their programs, examples
• include Hutch Hockey Association, Baseball Association, Tennis Association,
Basketball Association, and Wrestling Club to name a few.
BUSINESS /SERVICE ORGANIZATION INVOLVEMENT
•
The Department of Parks
and Recreation has depended heavily
on donations and
volunteerism from both business
and service organizations over the years. Item
of involvement and dollars
donated are listed as follows.
Youth Sponsorship
100 Contributors
$6,500 - $7,500 Annually
Baseball Association
V.M.F. Improvements
$6,500 - $8,500 Annually
Arena Advertising Boards
Businesses
$4,500 Annually
Firstate Federal
Brochure
$2,000- $3,000 Annually
Firstate Federal
Senior Newsletter
$6,000 - $7,000 Annually
Firstate Federal
Tree Planting $8,500 donation
$2,200 remains
Citizens Bank
Zamboni Purchase
$15,000 Donation
Jaycees
Volunteer Football Officials
$400 Value
United Way
Youth Center /Sr. Center/
$12,000 (1990)
Adaptive Recreation
McLeod County A.R.C.
Adaptive Recreation
$300 (1990)
Park Improvements 1990
Elk's Club
Park Shelter
$4,000 Actual
Jaycees
Picnic Tables /Also Assembled
$800 Actual
Lutheran Brotherhood
Landscaping
$375 Actual
Hutch Garden Club
Flower Project
$300 Value
Brown's Floral
Library Square Planting
$200 Value
A.F.S.
Plaque Donations
$750 Value
.
Odd Fellows
Plaque Donations
$120 Value
Masonic Lodge
Tree Donations
$100 Actual
V.F.W. /Legion
Flag Donations
$400 Value
3M
Park Donations
$500 Annually
1991 Additions
Elks Club
Baseball Sponsorship
$2,400
Lions Club
Park Adoption
$500
Rotary Cloub
Park Adoption
$1,000
United Way
Youth Center /Senior Center/
$15,200
Adaptive Recreation
Odd Fellows
Park Adoption
?
Elks
Park Development
?
Jaycees
Baseball Sponsorship
Pending
Volunteerism Projects
Celebrate Minnesota Project 1989 -1990
Crow River Clean -Up
1990 -1991
Many of the groups that use our facilities are dependent on contributions from
service organizations. Without their contributions, these programs would
probably be looking toward the city for funding of their programs, examples
• include Hutch Hockey Association, Baseball Association, Tennis Association,
Basketball Association, and Wrestling Club to name a few.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
STAFF IDEAS
Reductions
Cut uniforms /provide shirt only
Eliminate one outdoor rink /reduce operating hours
Leave without pay /retain benefits
Eliminate merit
Cut downtown snow removal for business
Eliminate stump removal
Weed notices by complaint only could eliminate part -time staff
Open Civic Arena one week later in the fall
Continued effort to use volunteer coaches for football program
Bond for capital expenditures (i.e. playground equipment)
Reven
Non- resident fees
Participation fees /one time fee
Increase ice rental
Shelter fee increase
Increase weed administration fee
Charge for tennis lights
C �
J
•
i
March 12, 1991
M E M O R A N D U M
•
•
TO GARY PLOTZ, KEN MERRILL, CITY COUNCIL
FROM HAZEL SITZ, TRANSIT COORDINATORiy��
RE BUDGET CUTS
Total transit budget for 1991 is $120,500 (per transit contract).
Anticipated fare revenue in 1991 $ 22,000.
Budget shortfall in transit for 1991 is estimated at:
Anticipated before the current state cuts $3,000
Possible loss from State operating assistance 6,000
Possible loss by city (40X of operating cost) 4,000
TOTAL 13,000
PROPOSAL FOR CUTS BY TRANSIT COORDINATOR /STAFF ANNUAL SAVING COMMENT
(Subject to amendment of transit contract)
1. Eliminate purchase of one office chair $250 Workable
2. Reduce dispatch hours by 1 hour per day
during June, July, August (65 days)
3. Sell half price bulk courtesy coupons only
for groups of 6 or more at one location
4. Use 2 fare zones - Shuttle corridor is Zone 1,
all other is Zone 2 - add $.25 to Zone 2 fare
5. Add $.25 to fare if ride is requested less than
2 hours from time of call
6. Eliminate option of adding I or 2 hours service
at peak demand during winter months - refuse some
rides in bad weather
7. Eliminate monthly pass, or charge extra $.25
in Ione 2 for pass holders
B. Eliminate service on the 4 city holidays
9. Eliminate New Years eve service
TOTAL
$500 Workable
300 Workable
4,000 Riders will object
625 Riders will object
500 Riders will object
500 Bad P. R.
300 Bad P. R.
75 Workable (P.R. ?)
7,050
Hutchinson Community Development Corp.
(612) 567 -7500
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 20, 1991
TO: Gary Plotz
Ken Merrill
FROM: John Bernhagen, HCDC
SUBJECT: Budget Cuts
45 Washington Ave. East
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
The HCDC Board of Directors was recommending a combination cost of living and
merit increase totaling 5% for 1991 for the Executive Director.
I felt in view of the pending budget cuts and because our organization at this time is
primarily salary driven a 3% total increase was appropriate.
Consequently, this presents a budget savings of $ 474.40 from 4300 Professional
Services.
The official action of the Board of Directors is that this is to be retroactive to January 1,
1991.
WL
cW
C �
J
0
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 21, 1991 _ _ _ - _ _ _
T I D: Ken Merrill
FROM: Connie Mangan
SUBJECT: Budget Enhancement /Reduction
For Budget enhancement, I suggest the building permit fee which the City
Council has waived for theose buildings in Downtown Rehab Project be
reinstated. I also suggest charging the sign permit fee for those buildings
in the C -3 District which also has been waived by the City Council.
• From the Small Cities Program budget, $100 could be reduced from the
budgeted amount $250 in operating supplies. Also $50 could be reduced
from the travel, school and donference budget of $250.
CM /sk
•
C
March 12, 1991
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO GARY PLOT1, MIEN MERRILL, CITY COUNCIL
FROM HAZEL SITZ, PERSONNEL COORDINATOR
RE BUDGET CUTS
An option for dealing with the budget shortfall Mould be to eliminate the
annual city appreciation picnic. Fewer than one —half of the individuals who
are invited attend each year.
The cost of the picnic is approximately $2000.
City Hail Parks & Recreation Police Deyarbnent
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
•
u
Ll
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 22, 1991
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
------------------------------
FROM: Chuck Nelson
------------------------------
SUBJECT: 1991 Liquor Store Budget Cuts
------------------------ - - - - --
I propose the following budget reductions:
Part time wages $3425.00
Advertising 1500.00
Clothing Allowance 400.00
Misc Items 500.00
Travel School and Conferences 150.00
Total Cuts $5975.00
CN /sk
•
" (612) 587 -5151
0171f OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASN1 dGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON, P✓11NN, 55350
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: March 11, 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Gary Plotz and Ken Merrill
Randy DeVries
1991 Budget cuts and revenue increases
HUTCHINSON WATER DEPARTMENT
FIRST TO CUT:
A. Professional Services - $ 19,000.00
B. Capital Outlay
1. Touch pad conversion - 35,000.00 •
2. Filter rehab - 7,000.00
3. Chair - 150.00
4. Radio - 600.00
TOTAL $ 61,750.00
HUTCHINSON WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT
AST TO CUT
A. Revenue Increase
1.
Hercules N.Y.
+ $
17,343.00
1990
.00
1991
+
35,000.00
1992
2.
Jet truck increase use
+
5,000.00
1991
3.
Auto -them Blooming Prairie
+
35,000.00
1991
4.
Permit fee - industrial users
+
2,000.00
1991
TOTAL $
42,000.00
1991
B. First to Cut
1. Capital Outlay
a. Portable radio - $ 750.00
b. Hi pressure washer - 700.00
TOTAL $ 1,450.00 •
RD /ds
Mayor Ackland and City Council Members
® March 21, 1991
Page Two
The following request was also considered by the Board, which requires your
approval:
%, 1 t Lai acanj touipment rurcnase for X RaY Department The Board
heard a request to purchase in -house CT equipment for the new CT room.
Bids were received from six vendors. After careful review of all bids
by the Director of Radiology, Dr. Boardman, Radiologist, members of the
Radiology Department, and hospital Administration, it was recommended
that the bid received by Picker in the amount of $557,560 be accepted.
Following discussion:
"Motion was made by Torgerson, seconded by Skeie, to recommend to
the City Council approval of the bid for CT equipment, for the new
CT room, from Picker in the amount of $557,560. All were in
favor. Motion carried. "
Thank you for your consideration of these requests.
Sincerely,
HU CHINSON COMMU I Y SPITAL
ilip `G. G ves V
Administrat r
PGG:lm
40
March 22, 1991
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE: PLACE
HuTcHlxsoN, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Hutchinson Community Hospital
Remodeling & Construction Project
Our File No. 3750 -88 -0004
Dear Gary:
OF MO XL
CHARLES L CARMICRAEL"
IFIL W. CAMERON
3661 CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 53416
(612)345 -9000
MR TOLL FREE 600- 343 -4345
PAX (612) 343 -1793
SOI SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612)369-2214
PAX (612) 369.5506
I am enclosing for next Tuesday night's meeting an escrow account
• agreement between the Hutchinson Community Hospital and David M.
Volkmann Construction, Inc.
As the City Council probably recalls, a similar agreement was used
with the general contractor in the wastewater treatment plant
construction. This agreement allows the contractor to be paid
funds that would otherwise be held as retainage. The retainage is,
of course, in the event of problems with work performed by the
contractor so that the City is protected in case unexpected costs
are present.
The agreement that this office drafted in that instance worked well
and no problems were presented. We have had a request from the
Volkmann Construction Company to use a similar agreement for the
Hospital project. Certainly such an agreement would be appropriate
and I am enclosing for the Council's information a copy of
Minnesota Statute §15.73 which outlines the circumstances under
which alternative forms of retainage may be used and the types of
retainage that are appropriate.
I am enclosing a copy of the proposed escrow account agreement
between the Hutchinson Community Hospital and David M. Volkmann
Construction, Inc.
The agreement is in acceptable form and I recommend approval of it.
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRLAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY TBE MINNESOTA STATE HAR ASSOCIATION q-x
DAVID B. ARNOLD
OARY D. MCDOWELL
•
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. RODE
LAURA E. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUP.00EMANN
PAUL D. DOVE
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES DTLEY
JULIA A. CHRISTIANS
RICHARD O. WORE
TIMOTHY W. PAPTNSHI
March 22, 1991
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE: PLACE
HuTcHlxsoN, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Hutchinson Community Hospital
Remodeling & Construction Project
Our File No. 3750 -88 -0004
Dear Gary:
OF MO XL
CHARLES L CARMICRAEL"
IFIL W. CAMERON
3661 CEDAR LASE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 53416
(612)345 -9000
MR TOLL FREE 600- 343 -4345
PAX (612) 343 -1793
SOI SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612)369-2214
PAX (612) 369.5506
I am enclosing for next Tuesday night's meeting an escrow account
• agreement between the Hutchinson Community Hospital and David M.
Volkmann Construction, Inc.
As the City Council probably recalls, a similar agreement was used
with the general contractor in the wastewater treatment plant
construction. This agreement allows the contractor to be paid
funds that would otherwise be held as retainage. The retainage is,
of course, in the event of problems with work performed by the
contractor so that the City is protected in case unexpected costs
are present.
The agreement that this office drafted in that instance worked well
and no problems were presented. We have had a request from the
Volkmann Construction Company to use a similar agreement for the
Hospital project. Certainly such an agreement would be appropriate
and I am enclosing for the Council's information a copy of
Minnesota Statute §15.73 which outlines the circumstances under
which alternative forms of retainage may be used and the types of
retainage that are appropriate.
I am enclosing a copy of the proposed escrow account agreement
between the Hutchinson Community Hospital and David M. Volkmann
Construction, Inc.
The agreement is in acceptable form and I recommend approval of it.
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRLAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY TBE MINNESOTA STATE HAR ASSOCIATION q-x
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
March 22, 1991 •
Page 2
If you have any questions with regard to this matter, do not
hesitate to contact me.
Incidentally, for your information, I am also enclosing a copy of
correspondence received from Norwest Bank dated February 14, 1991
notifying the City that it does agree to serve as an escrow agent.
The Council should also be aware that at least one other
significant contractor on the project may very well request similar
treatment and assuming that details come together on that request,
it will be presented at the City Council meeting Tuesday night as
well.
Thank you. Best personal regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & A McDOWELL
B
G. Barry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
•
P
C J
CI
aa►a�
aaaaa
NOmmw BANKS
aaaaa
as Iaa
February 14, 1991
M.A. Mortenson Company
700 Meadow Lane North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
Attention: Peter Worthington
RE:David Volkmann
Hutchinson Community Hospital
Dear Peter,
Nonvest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
Camden Office
4141 Lyndale Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479.2065
6121667.1600
Enclosed is the Escrow Account Agreement for
David N. Volkmann Construction Co., Inc. Per Paragraph 6,
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. serving as Escrow. Agent will
provide an accounting of all assets held in the escrow account
on a monthly basis. If you have any questions regarding this,
please contact me directly.
Thank -you for your help in this matter.
Sincerely,
V
Denise Lien
Commercial Banking Assistant
667 -1609
9 -x
1172 DEPARTMENTS OF STATE IN GENERAL 372
completed as approved by the public contracting agency. A progress payment shall not
be considered acceptance or approval of any work or waiver of any defects therein.
Subd. 2. A public contracting agency may reserve as retainage from any progress
payment on a public contract for a public improvement an amount not to exceed five
percent of the payment. A public agency may reduce the amount of the retainage and
may eliminate retainage on any monthly contract payment if, in the agency's opinion,
the work is progressing satisfactorily.
History: 1980 c 464 s 2
15.73 ALTERNATIVE FORM OF REIAINAGE.
Subdivision 1. At the option of the contractor, retainage shall be paid to the con-
tractor in accordance with this section.
Subd. 2. The contractor may deposit bonds or securities with the public contract-
ing agency or in any bank or trust company to be held in lieu of cash retainage for the
benefit of the public contracting agency. In that event the public agency shall reduce
the retainage in an amount equal to the value of the bonds and securities and pay the
amount of the reduction to the contractor. Interest on the bonds or securities shall be
payable to the contractor as it accrues.
Subd. 3. Bonds and securities deposited or acquired in lieu of retainage, as permit-
ted by subdivision 2, shall be of a character approved by the state treasurer, including
but not limited to:
(a) Bills, certificates, notes or bonds of the United States;
(b) Other obligations of the United States or its agencies;
(c) Obligations of any corporation wholly owned by the federal government; or
(d) Indebtedness of the Federal National Mortgage Association.
Subd. 4. If the public agency incurs additional costs as a result of the exercise of
the option described in this section, the agency may recover the costs from the contrac-
tor by reducing the final payment due under the contract. As work on the contract prog-
resses, the agency shall, upon demand, inform the contractor of all accrued costs.
History: 1980 c 464 s 3
15.74 EXCEPTIONS TO APPLICATION.
Sections 15.71 to 15.73 applyto all public contracts except those contracts in which
receipt of federal financing is conditioned on adherence to terms and conditions which
are inconsistent with sections 15.71 to 15.73.
History: 1980 c 464 s 4
15.771
[Renumbered 13.69, subdivision 1)
15.772
[Renumbered 13.45]
15.773
[Renumbered 13.361
15.774
[Renumbered 13.57]
15.775
[Renumbered 13.39]
15.776
[Renumbered 13.80]
15.777
[Renumbered 13.83]
15.778
[Renumbered 13.731
15.779
[Renumbered 13.70, subd. 2]
15.781
[Renumbered 13.41]
15.782
[Renumbered 13.531
15.783
[Renumbered 13.31]
15.784
[Renumbered 13.51]
15.785
[Renumbered 13.381
15.786
[Renumbered 13.54]
m
.
15.787
[Renumh
15.788
[Renumh
15.789
[ Renumb
15.791 Subdivisio
Subd.2.
[Rer
Subd. 3.
[Rer.
Subd. 4.
[Ren
Subd, 5.
[Ren
Subd. 6.
[Ren
Subd. 7.
[Rem
Subd. 8.
[Rem
Subd- 9.
[Ren:
Subd.10.
[Re
15.792 [Renumbei
15.793 EXTENSIO
Court services da
sified by temporary cl,
13.06, shall retain the
History: 1981 c 3
15801 [Renumbers
15802 fRenumbere
15.803 [Ren
15204 [Ren re
15.805 [ Renumbere
15806 fRenumbere
15.811 [ Renumbere(
35 DISCIPLINE F
It is the polity of tl
. It
free from
tloyee who harasses
ir, or national origin
History 1989 c 96 s
E
ESCROW ACCOUNT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
AND DAVID N. VOLKKANN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO CONTRACT NO. 13 FOR THE
EXPANSION AND RENOVATION OF THE
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
between the City of Hutchinson dba Hutchinson Community Hospital, Minnesota,
hereinafter "Owner ", and David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc., whose address
is P.O. Box 126, Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014, hereinafter "Contractor ", and
Norwest Bank of Minnesota, N.A., hereinafter "Escrow Agent ".
WITNESSETH:
• WHEREAS, on the 28th day of August, 1990, the Owner entered into a
contract with David N. Volkmann Construction, Inc. for the work included in
Contract No. 13, for the Expansion and Renovation of Hutchinson Community
Hospital, Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "the contract" and
WHEREAS, the Owner, the Contractor, and the Escrow Agent mutually desire
to enter into this agreement, which sets forth the procedure for the deposit
in escrow of the retention provided by the terms on the contract.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. In lieu of the procedures for handling retained percentages set
forth in payments provisions of the contract, the Owner and the Contractor
agree to the placement in escrow with the above -named Escrow Agent, and
pursuant to the procedures set forth in this agreement, qualified securities
under Minnesota Statue Section 15.73 including notes or bonds of the United
States of America or any State of the United States. Notes or bonds of any
State of the United States shall not include revenue bonds or notes of any
political subdivisions of the states. All securities shall be negotiable and
carry no restrictions on marketability. Except as limited in this paragraph,
the choice of securities shall be that of the Contractor.
2. It is agreed that the escrow account shall have at all times a
current market value equal to or greater than the dollar amount that would
otherwise be retained by the Owner under the payments provisions of the
contract. The Contractor agrees to supplement the escrow account if its
market value is less than the dollar amount that would be retained by the
Owner. Moreover, the Owner reserves the right to make withholdings if the
value of the escrow account as herein defined falls below the amount that
would otherwise be retained by the Owner.
1
E
3. The securities shall be made payable to the Contractor. The
Contractor shall supply the Owner with a power of attorney in form
satisfactory to the Owner, authorizing the Escrow Agent to convert the escrow
account into cash, by sale or otherwise. A signed copy of the power of
attorney shall be furnished to the Escrow Agent. The Owner shall keep the
power of attorney in his possession until such time as he determines to act as
provided in Paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 of this supplemental agreement. The
Contractor agrees that such power of attorney shall be irrevocable until such
time as final settlement under the contract has been made or revocation has
been authorized in writing by the Owner.
4. The Contractor hereby assumes full responsibility for the proper
performance by the Escrow Agent of his duties. The Contractor shall be liable
to the Owner for any losses occurring to the escrow account as a result of
actions of the Escrow Agent, for any reason whatsoever, including default or
bankruptcy of the Escrow Agent.
5. The Contractor is responsible for any compensation of the Escrow
Agent and for the costs incurred by the Escrow Agent in the operation of the
escrow account. Such costs and compensation of the Escrow Agent shall be
handled separately from the escrow account and shall not be used to diminish
the value of the escrow account.
6. Within 15 days after establishing the escrow account and monthly (by •
the 25th of each month) thereafter, the Escrow Agent shall furnish to the
Owner and M.A. Mortenson Company an accounting of all assets held in the
escrow account, including a list describing each security, its face value,
maturity date, its current market value and the total market value of all
assets held . in the escrow account. A more detailed accounting of the holdings
in the escrow account shall be furnished by the Escrow Agent to either the
Owner or the Contractor upon written request at any time during the life of
the supplemental agreement.
7. Any interest actually paid on securities or sums held by the Escrow
Agent shall be handled as may be separately agreed upon by the Contractor and
the Escrow Agent unless otherwise directed by the Owner.
8. It is expressly understood that this agreement is being entered into
as a supplement to the basic contract. Pursuant to the contract, the Owner is
authorized to render decisions as to whether the Contractor is in default,
that the Contractor has been overpaid under this contract, or that he is
indebted to the Owner because of obligations arising under the contract, or
otherwise. For the purpose of this agreement, it is therefore agreed that a
determination of the Owner that the Contractor is in default or that the
Contractor is indebted to the Owner under the contract or for any other
reason, shall be final and conclusive and that the Contractor's sole remedy in
such instances shall be as provided in the contract 'documents. In accordance
therewith, the Contractor hereby relinquishes any and all rights that he might
have under the terms of the contract, this agreement, or otherwise, to file or •
prosecute any claim or demand which might seek to interfere with, delay, or
prohibit the Owner from demanding the proceeds of the escrow account from the
Escrow Agent or the Escrow Agent from delivering the same to the Owner upon
2
u
receipt of the proper demand from the Owner. The Escrow Agent shall not be
liable to the Owner or to the Contractor if he proceeds in accordance with the
instructions of the Owner as herein provided even though it may be later
determined by any duly authorized court or administrative body that the
Owner's notice or decision of default or indebtedness of the Contractor were
improper or unlawful.
9. Upon receipt by the Escrow Agent of a determination by the Owner
that the Contractor is in default or indebted to the Owner as herein defined,
the Escrow . ;gent shall, pursuant to the Contractor's previously provided power
of attorney, sell and convert the securities then comprising the escrow
account to cash and shall remit to the Owner within 15 days of receipt of said
determination all sums realized therefrom up to the amount of the retention
which would otherwise have been in the possession of the Owner.
10. In addition to the rights of the Owner provided elsewhere, it is
also agreed that if the Owner has reason to believe that the Contractor is in
default or is indebted to the Owner under the terms and conditions identified
above, he may so notify the Escrow Agent in writing. Upon receipt of such
written notice, the Escrow Agent will take no action which might result in a
disbursement of any portion of the escrow account to the Contractor or his
assignee for a period not to exceed 60 days pending issuance of a formal
Owner's decision of default or indebtedness to the Owner as herein provided.
• 11. The Owner shall advise the Escrow Agent if the Contractor executes
a valid and effective assignment of contract funds under Article 9 of the
agreement, in which case the Escrow Agent shall transfer releases from the
escrow account to the assignee rather that to the Contractor.
12. The Owner may periodically determine that the value of sums or
securities held by the Escrow Agent may be reduced by a stated amount in
accordance with the payments provisions of the contract. Upon receipt of
written notice of such determination, the Escrow Agent shall release from the
escrow account the appropriate sums or securities as are required by such
determination.
13. This supplemental agreement shall be effective on the date first
hereinabove written and shall remain in full force and effect until the
contract is completed. Upon satisfactory completion and acceptance of all
work under the contract, the Owner shall advise the Escrow Agent and the
Contractor in writing that the proceeds of the escrow account may be released,
that the escrow arrangement is concluded, and that this supplemental agreement
is terminated.
11. The Escrow Agent is not a party to nor bound by an instrument or
agreement other than this agreement; he shall not be required to take notice
of any default or any other matter, nor bound, by nor required to give any
notice or demand, nor required to take any action whatever except as herein
. expressly provided.
3
lJ
15. The Contractor agrees that this supplemental agreement shall in no
way infringe on or restrict the rights of the Contractor and the Owner under
the original contract.
16. Any notice given by any of the parties hereto shall be sufficient
only if made in writing and delivered in person or sent by registered mail or
certified mail to the address shown below, or to such other address as the
respective parties hereto shall designate by notice given as herein required.
Notice hereunder shall be effective when delivered. Notices shall be give as
follows:
To the Owner:
To the Contractor:
To the Escrow Agent:
City Of Hutchinson
dba Hutchinson Community Hospital
1095 Highway 15 South
Hutchinson, MN 55350
At the Contractor's address
stated below in this
agreement.
At the Escrow Agent's
address stated below in
this agreement.
•
•
J
0
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as
of the date first hereinabove stated.
ATTEST: David N. Volkmann Construction. Inc.
(Contractor)
(Authorized Signature)
Name (typed) N. Volkmann
Title President
Address F.O. Box 126
Circle Pines, PIN 55014
•
U ST:
r
u 4 - gc"�- —
v'0 EA':? ?., ?'INNESOTA N.A.
' (Escrow ht) 7
BJ G
( uthorized gnature)
typed) Jean -Marie Turng ist
Title Commercial Banking Offi
Address Lyndale Avenue N orth
Mpls. Mn. 55412 -2065
ATTEST:
•
City of Hutchinson
Tit
5
CITY OF HUTCHINSON MINNESOTA
SUPPLEMENT TO CONTRACT NO.LETTING
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT N0. 1
SHEET 1 0 -
I CONTRACTOR:
IFEDERAL PROJECT ISTATE PROJECT ICITY PROJECT
I DIAMOND 5 WRECKING, INC.
I ( 1 90-25
• ADDRESS:
ILOCATION:
1 RR 2, BOX 179, HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
I DOWNTOWN SHOPKO DEVELO SITE - PHAS 1
(THIS CONTRACT IS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
I
I Add the demolition of the small building
I
i
dust west of Wilna`s Beauty Salon I
I (15 - 1st Avenue N.E.) to the contract.
i
All work to be in accordance with
I the contract specifications.
I
I
I
I ORIGINAL CONTRACT:
I
I
$36,800.00
I INCREASE
I
$ 800.00
I
I TOTAL
I
I
I
I
$37,600.00
I
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
1
�
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
p
I
I
I
1
(Original Contract Amount i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1
1 $36,800.00 (Dated:
I
19—
(Original Contract Date —1
I
� I
Director of Engineering
1 1 -22 -1991 IDated:
79
I
, — I
I
I
• I IDated:
Contractor
I
79
1
I
I I
Mayor 1
I IDated:
19
1 I
,
City Administrator
�/ - y
i
Electrical Contractors
4th Ave. N.E.
Hutchinson, (\An. 55350
[612) 587 -3030
March 25, 1991
Chuck Nelson
% Hutchinson Liquor store
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Suh�ect: Relocation of
Liquor store
•
Dear Sir:
As per your drawing and our job walkthrough, Quade's
is pleased to quote to you the following items:
Inc
The above work can be completed for the sum of
$2 0,00.00. Please note that for bidding purposes we have
included only what is on the drawine. Items such as gen-
eral lighting and convenience outlets have not been
addressed. _
R =srbCtfU
` 13y su mi
Quade`s Inc.
Mark Muckenhirn, Con t. 1[c r.
yL- i yb
Enclosure
Qty. 1 - Square D 3 -phase 120/208V
40 circuit panelboard w /main
breaker
7 - single pole breakers
2 - 3 -phase breakers
Lot - conduit, wire, and fittings to
wire new store location per
wiring diagram (see attached)
Lot - disconnecting camoressors from
existing location
110-A ,
O QtIM s''
_ .i HUTCHINSON OPTIMIST CLUB
Natto 4 HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
�g
March 25, 1991
Hutchinson City Council
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Sirs:
The Optimist Club of Hutchinson would like to make a
request again this year to reserve the use of Library
Square on April 20, 1991.
April 20 will be our annual Green -Up Clean -Up Day.
Registration at the Park will begin at 9:00 A.M., and a
brief ceremony will be held in the Park when the youth
return from their pickup areas at approximately 11:00 A.X.
Doug Meyer has been contacted to provide a city
truck for disposal of the refuse.
We would appreciate your action on this request at
your next meeting. If you have any further questions,
please call me at 587 -2233.
With kin�reg�ards,
Joel Kr t
Optimist Club
JCR /jml
•
L �i. JBc\
/d ` 7q°
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 26 1991
WATER & SEWER FUND
employer contribution
73.11
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
673.62
*PERA
employer cotnribution
394.90
*Hutch Telephone
telephone
284.41
Aagard West
March recycling & bins
6,225.30
Central Garage
Feb repairs
34.10
Certified Labs
aerosol
86.63
Crow Chemical
coveralls
67.90
Curtin Scientific
lab supplies
54.81
Datastream
support renewal
1,250.00
DeVries, Randy
school expense
39.78
DPC
cylinders
55.00
Fischer & Porter
service call
153.40
Goodin Co.
thermostat
36.89
Gov. Trg. Service
reg- J.Lanz
15.00
Hach
lab supplies
182.28
Hutch Utilities
electricity
314.60
Ideal Shoe Shop
meter holder
20.00
Lanz, Jerry
conf expense
34.12
League of MN Cities
4th qtr work /comp
1,901.00
LMC Housing Bureau
annual conference
65.00
Mid - America Plastics
pipes
62. ^8
MN Valley Testing
tests
269.00
NuTech Env
nozzels
137.50
Diane
mileage
28.70
Reliance Electric
is Reliance
addl charge
4.56
Schlueter Refrig
repair & replace
60.50
Shopko
supplies
13.98
Standard Printing
supplies
86.46
SVEN
carbon
609.36
TOTAL
$13,161.78
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
73.11
*pERA
employer contribution
42.83
Brandon Tire
repairs & tires
163.20
Carquest
supplies
484.75
Catco
lite kit
47.96
Campion Auto
supplies
155.96
Hayden Murphy
diaphragm
69.60
Hutch Mach
chipper blades
60.00
Hutch Wholesale
Jerabek Machine
supplies
parts
39.02
34.44
Jerry's Transmission
repair parts
285.86
MacQue Equip
equipment parts
500.23
MN Trucking Assc
forms
18.32
MTI
Northern
Rockmount Research
Sorensen Farm
State of MN
Sweeney Bros
W.D.Cooling
Wigen Motor
•
GEI FUND
1990
Austin Tech
1991
*Withhold Tax Acct
*Youth Center
*Hutch Telephone
*DNR
*PERA
*PERA
*Commissioner of Revenue
*AARP
*DNR
*DNR
A & B Electric
Al's Shirt Shop
American Risk
Arnold & McDowell
Automation Supply
Bach, Harvey
Bennett Office
Bernhagen, John
Berry, Shirley
Brinkman
Butterworth
Carquest
Central McGowan
Central Garage
Chamber of Commerce
Christensen Piano
Clarey's Safety
Com of Transportation
Copy Equipment
County Treasurer
Doherty, G. & Jackson
Eileen Goeders Estate
Electric Motor
Ericksons More 4
Const
ball joint & arm
shoe assembly
welding rod
pins
decals
equipment parts
repair radii- -.tor
repairs
trg G.Field
TOTAL
employer contribution
transfer of funds
telephone
registration fees
employer contribution
employer contribution
Feb arena sales tax
driving course
registration fees
registration fees
generator repair
jackets
March services
March prof services
ribbons & cartridges
big band refund
toner
(arch comp
shopping spree refund
bulbs
books
wire
lease renewal
Feb repairs
publication & postage
tune piano
equipment
hangar payment
paper
DL fees
small cities loan
contract payment
repair sander
supplies
199.07
111.92
133.04
4.20
48.00
723.07
57.50
334.03
$3,586.11
150.00
2
4,425.77
5,750.00
1,752.78
93.00
8.28
5,115.86
116.28
280.00
253.00
85.00
33.00
440.50
800.00
3,084.00
107.64
50.00
25.20
1,960.00
8.00
20.64
43.76
9.47
87.98
5,568.78
30.52
47.00
3,187.65
700.00
92.75
110.50
2,707.88
1,500.00
94.00
16.44
L
3
Field, George
tapes
3.82
242.79
Flexible Pipe
nozzle
11.12
Floor Care
filter bags
242.18
Glencoe Uniforms
uniforms
15.00
Gov Trg Service
reg- M.Haugen
17.50
Guardian Pest
March service
54.15
Hensen, Ma--k
meeting expense
1.50
Home Bakery
cookies
;supplies
1.75
Hutch Whola,sale
inspection
53.00
Hutch Fire & Safety
Hutch Utilities
elec & gas
10,786.19
Hutch Public Sci =Dols
bldg rent
fuel
71.25
10,185.90
Jayco Aviation
aviation
105.65
Jerabek Machine
iron
vest purchaae
53.24
Jones, Charles
Kitchenmaster, Mark
school expense
58.50
Lamp, Miry
Golden Strings refund
32.00
35.03
Larson, Quentin
seminar expense
4th qtr work /comp
57,223.00
Lcigue of MN Cities
LiC Housing Bureau
annual conf lodging
455.00
Marka, Jim
meeting expense
2' =08
54.90
McGarvey
coffee
16.51
M?d Blueprint
paper
25.00
MYCA
reg- D.Meier
6.99
Northern
drill part
10.30
Northern States Supply
parts
110.00
Office Products
okidata repair
463.20
.
Peterson Bus
bus trips
1.75
Pikal Music
tape
130.58
Qude Electric
repairs
tokens & washes
90.50
Rite Way Auto
Schlueter Refrig
charged unit
195.00
Schmeling 01.1
kerosene
83.67
203.32
Sioux Valley
blacktop
4.38
Sorensen Farm
nuts & bolts
supplies
58.07
Standard Printing
36.45
Streichers
magazine
rental
440.00
Tenvoorde Motor
car
tickets
138.80
Ticket Craft
supplies
33.38
UBC
Urban Comm
ice show rental
945.00
98.54
US k2st
March service
35.00
US Postmaster
box rent
244.23
Xerox
Feb usage
TOTAL
$121,854.90
BONA 1 - PIM$
YOUTH CENTER
*Withhold Tax ACCt
*PERA
Brian Sweeney
Pikal Music Store
Mark's TV Service
City of Hutch
Henry's Foods
employer contribution
employer contribution
band
cables & speakers
amp repair
water, sewer, refuse
supplies
TOTAL
61.01
35.12
45.00
147.00
57.06
80.53
91.53
$517.25
1980 INC DEBT SERV
G.Doherty & Jackson Co
8% loan
1,027.12
216.60
County Treasurer
Aden costs
TOTAL
$1,243.72
1990 TAX INC CONSTR FUND
Arnold & McDowell
part pymt prof sery
6,419.65
Gary Peterson
relocation expenses
7,740.10
TOTAL
$14,159.75
•
LIQUOR FUND
City of Hutchinson
lottery sales
34.00
City of Hutchinson
payroll
3,856.49
Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
273.97
PER
employer contribution
157.56
City of Hutchinson
lottery sales
1,100.00
Com of Revenue
Feb sales tax
7,311.17
10,087.95
Johnson Brothers
wine & liquor
wine & liquor
4,984.40
Ed Phillips
wine & liquor
5,116.33
c'riggs, Cooper
wine & liquor
2,818.34
Quality Wines
TOTAL
$35,740.21
0
Cit of YOUR INFORMAT_OU
ut�u°
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Mark Schnobrich
DATE: March 22, 1991
RE: Curbside Recycling
This is a summary of the first week of curbside recycling city wide.
The response was quite good, with all five days of pickup showing
greater than 40% participation.
11 OF POSSIBLE # OF
STOPS PICKUPS %
Monday 488 202 41
n
Tuesday
633
273
43
Wednesday
1,083
495
46
Thursday
711
371
52
Friday
508
240
47
TOTAL PERCENTAGE
OF PARTICIPATION
46
The week of March 25, 1991 will see the incorporation of all apartment
complexes into the recycling program.
klm
0
Cihj Hall
37 Washington Avenue lVest
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled Paper -
Police Deparhnent
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
DAVID H.ARNOID
• GARY D. MCDGIPELI.
STEVEN A- ANDERSON
G. HARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K. FRETLAND
DAVID A. DRI; F.CA EDIANN
PAUL D. DM E
JOSEPH 11. PAI F.M£NT
JAMES UILEY
JULIA A.CRRISTIdNS
RICHARD O. MCGRE
TIMOTHY N'. FAFINSKI
March 14, 1991
ARNOLD &. McDOU'ELL
ATTORNEYS AT LANA7
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
(612) 587 -7575
FAIC (612)587 -4096
RF-SID£ST ATTORNEY
G. HARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Phase II Development
Our File No. 3244 -89 -0031
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
OP C06YSEL
CHARLES R. CARMICHA£L'
WILLIAM K. CAMERON
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MIN NESOTA 55
(612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800 -343 -4545
FAS(612)545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON. MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369-2211
FAX (612) 389-5506
Eal-
Dear Gary:
You may recall that I had written Dorsey & Whitney on the question
• of whether June 1, 1991 was a deadline that was of any concern to
the City with respect to downtown tax increment financing.
Jerry was kind enough to reply to me by correspondence dated March
8, 1991 and I an passing along a copy of that correspondence. I
would ask that you provide a copy of the correspondence and this
letter to the Council for their information.
If you have any questions with regard to this matter, do not
hesitate to contact me.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNO Mc DWELL
i
G. Darry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
0
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST D5 THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAN SPECIALIST BY THE MISNF.SOT] STATE DA ASSOCIATION
oRSEY & WHITNEY
mO PARE AVENUE
NEw YORE. NEW YOUR 10022
1av 415 -9xo..
13:3n CONRECTICCT AV E4CE. 4. w.
W.SHIEGTOY. 11, C. 2003.
(202,851-0100
3 GRACECHCRCH STREET
LONDON ECJV OAT. ENGLAND
44- 11- 829 - '4.1'14
96.RCE TRONCIIET
7:009 PARIS. FRANCE
34.1- 42- EG -J4 -JB
45, RUE DE TREVES
8 -1040 BRUSSELS. BELOTLH
32 -x -23B -78-11
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE FAST
MINNEAPOLIS. MINHFSOTA 55402-1498
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 24-W,05
FAX (612) 340 -28fi
JEROME P. GUJIGAN
(6 3462962
Mr. G. Barry Anderson
Arnold & McDowell
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, Minnesota
127 EAST FRONT STREET
MISSOULA. MOETANA 59602
(400)121 -0025
2oi FIRST Avr\uE, s. w., su1Tr son
ROCHESTER. MINNESOTA 55902
1501) 2"-3t51,
March 8, 1991
55350 -2563
Re: Phase II - Downtown Development
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CP. \TF.R
RILLINOS.RONTAEA 59100
14.) 252 -:1000
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
GREAT PALLS, MORTARA 59401
lOOfi)121 -3092
FOR YOUR INFORM N
In your February 21st letter to me you asked whether there are any
deadlines by which tax increment bonds must be sold for Phase II of the Downtot"m
Development project.
Dear Barry:
As you are aware many Minnesota municipalities (including
Hutchinson) created tax increment financing districts in early 1990 because of
legislation pending in the Legislature restricting the use of tax increment financing.
The restrictions were enacted in legislation which passed at the close of the 1990
session and are contained in 1990 Minnesota Law's, Chapter 604, Article 7. There is
generally grandfathered from the new restrictions tax increment financing districts
for which the request for certification of the original tax capacity of the district was
requested by the County Auditor before May 1, 1990. However, the Legislature was
aware of the rush to create tax increment districts to beat the new restrictions and in
response, provided that the new restrictions will apply to districts which were
requested for certification in April, 1990 unless by June 1, 1991 one of the following
three conditions have been met:
a. the municipality enters into a development agreement for
a site located in the district;
rJ
b. bonds were issued to finance project costs; or
DoRsr-y &- WHITNEY
Page -2-
Mr. G. Barry Anderson
March 8, 1991
C. the municipality acquired property in the district after
April 1, 1990.
The Downtown Development tax increment financing district was
created by the City of Hutchinson in April 1990 and the request for certification VI aS
made to the County on April 30, 1990, so one of the conditions set forth above will
need to have been met by June 1, 1991 to grandfather this district from the 1990
amendments. The district covered both the Phase I ( Shopko) and Phase II
developments and the actions taken by the City for the Phase I project (entering into
a development agreement with Shopko, selling bonds and acquiring property)
grandfathers the district from the 1990 amendments. Therefore, June 1, 1991 is not a
deadline for selling bonds for Phase 11 of the Downtown Development.
If you have any further questions, please give me a call.
Yours truly, •
Jerome P. Gilligan
JPG:cmn
cc: Gary D. Plotz
•
s
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
r�
u
�_..�__Y.•_ city of 66tchins:,n, W"- -30t -e
Fire �etl BorcB
CEST SERVILE S.H.0t7lE
•
Ehlera and Assoclstes
Fir.ana al A3viscrs
FILE • fi'JTFRCL0
3/19/1Gv1 4: <L -P!t
YIELD STATISTICS
DA P216CIPAL LU. `C1 141 E6EST V -BT SEn"CE FISCAL TCTAL
Z /C1 /i ri1 1
12,201.0E 1
12,2:1.04
62,579.79
2/01/1992 5
5';C:0.00 1
10.0N00% 2
18,2'8.75 _
E /01/1592 -
- 1
.10.250CC %'.:.:...15,218.75 6
_._13,213.75
15,437.50
2/)1/191. 7
75,GOO.GO f
f0.25JOv% 1
15,656.25 1
90,656.25 1
106,312.53
75,000.G0 1
10.55'JJC 1
11,912.59 6
11,812.50
.. 93,625.03
2 /C1 /iSl'9 7
:7,M.CJ.: .
.7,575:00
2; Of /irib T
TS,GJ0.03 1
1'.500 J% 7
7,673.04 6
62.875.00 9
90,750.0D
10.SOCv ^ ^CX 3
3,937.50 3
3,937.53
62,'171.00
2/01/1;".7 7
75,000.07 1
$47,919.79 547,919.79
Accru ?d tntereat frcn C4/15/1991 to C4/15/1591...
Avcrsge Life ..... ............................... ..
6: Years ......... ...............................
AVera;a Coupin ...................... I.............
lint interest Coat ( 61C) ...........................
C::'. Yi =IL for Arbitrc;e Purposes .................
Tr,- Interest Cast (TIC) ..........................
Effect i'.e Intere3t Colt (EIC) .....................
3.54 YEARS
1,417.79
10.4332141%
10.43 ?21:'X
10.43+''714%
10.437 - )71 , "4
1).437C71a3
L J
t•:3i1:1��t 1G:JY � . _ ...
City of Hutchinson, plr. asote
H2H 'fire 3vrdj
DEBT SERVICE £CCE4JLE
DATE
PRUICIPAL
CCU ?cA
110415ST
DEBT S.RYICE
FIS:r! TC C;.L
2/01/1771
2/C1/1992
50,000.00
'
5.044-'%
17,547.29
67,547.29
67,5:7.29
2/01119;2
5.2C703%
9,713.11
9,193.75
9,793.75
49,537
2/C 1/1553
57,007.00..
`75,000.00
493.7. r
_
_. - 8,493.75
2/01/1544
5.4006
8,4;3,75
23,493.75
91,:87
8/01/11)94
75,coo,CO
5.60000%
6,468.Ti
6,468.1
6,4d3•Y�
81,4:3.75
27,937.50
2/0111995
'.
4,363.75
4,31'.75
- 2/01!1991
2101/i 0156'
.75000.09
"5.75404%
._
.4,353:75':,
. - x9;3.75 ..
83,737.010.'
.'
E /71/19.15
2,212..0
2,212.50
2,212.50
77,112.59
79,425.40
75,000.49
S.SC:]CX
20,222.2)
480 ,222.29
423,22 ?.29
i0izt
400,D00.03
Ehler9 end Associates
Firenclal Advisors
YIELD STATISTICS
Accrues Interest frm 0:115/1951 to 04/15/1991...
A verage Life .................. I.,.................
B ond Years ..................................
A•:araga Coupon ..... ........................5555...
Nat Interest Coat ( %IC) ...........................
Bond Yietd for Arbitrs;s Purpos_s .................
True laterest Cost (TIC) ..........................
Effective interest Cost MO .....................
FILE • HJTFASE'J
3/19/1 01 4:46 P9
3,5;4 YEARS
1,417.73
5.553 =:21%
5.0
5 . L 2
5.6
•
0
03/19/91 16:55 L , 612 339 0a,54 EhNrs Cofl:
��- U
City of 4utchl.n^cA, illnnesct3
Ncv f I" , "-x 3
bE&T S•IVICIE CVJMRIS^q FA. -1 4115/1 tiEl %ET D/S Pit 'I :A0 DIS SA;I6cs FISCAL CATE P:i I t:C I Pjk L JOEREST
12 2 12,2)1.04 cr
other RenAfito ................ I ...................
Deposit to Debt scrvlct Fund
Amunt releaseJ frcra Prior I;Ful OSR Fv^ ........
C-Lhsr Costs .. ...............................
c D-a ................... I ..", ........
transfers from Prior 155'e De StrVice ......
N:T PR VALLL BC.,5'IT
10
2/0 ly i ry?
50,000.03
17,547 . 29
67,5W.29
1 S,21 �. 75
n
e,4.03
-
9,713.75
q 7)3.75
9,7,'3.T5
S9,7
63,2
8,4?5.00
r
2i.i 11.1
50,C00.00
.. ;.. �, . I w.
8' 493.7
8,"93-0
15 656 25
1 656 *2 5
7 11-2.5.�
7 IL
In
2j 01/1W4
75,000 03
113, �93.75
6,1,6'5 n
59, 655.2 .4
1 1.812.50
5,343.75
6 . 4 " 8 ' 7
6,4:3
-15
C6,312.50
5, 3' .3.75
io,eam)
21 1 /17. -5
r;P,0 Do
4,1-3.75
71
7,575.03
3,5.3s.25
3,50
7,)12.SC
E+ ollir
2i :
::,. 75
4,3�-3.73
t?,3,q -
I : ..
53
C2 875.0
1
3 537 13
7 .03
1, 25
2 211.53
7
743:07:50
i, 725,c)
J
2/01/1947
75,0c ).00
480,222.29
547,919.-n
67,697.50
67,677.5�
TOTAL
4DO,000,00
80 222.29
FILE
Ellerg and A%40ciAt&A
4:45 PH
Advisors
•
Gq c,S
P;Z'Al VAL'�E DOT
CE SA`VlhCS
SERM
559,6
other RenAfito ................ I ...................
Deposit to Debt scrvlct Fund
Amunt releaseJ frcra Prior I;Ful OSR Fv^ ........
C-Lhsr Costs .. ...............................
c D-a ................... I ..", ........
transfers from Prior 155'e De StrVice ......
N:T PR VALLL BC.,5'IT
10
.! City of accchimcn, Idrnascts
L lhrtry 'crda
D:OT S'2. ^Y1Cc SC!'ECUL'c
D%IE F.'.ISCIPAI CCz! ^:;1 D1TE'3ST
FISCAL ICTAL
11/01/1991
29`.•.9.f7
27,4LL,0
• 7
T . 412.;
107,251.57
5/01/1592
SJ,C -0.D7
3.100 -'7S
_
25,3'
25 • =:'.
_
23,287.50
11/0!l1;i3
5/01lf974
50,003.00
8.G0J0%
27`1 37.50
73, 227.57
21,137.57
96 575.07
,
'
11!91!17%4
5/Cl/19r5
-
SO,CCO "0.,
..
.. 21,137.5).
7
71,13.5D
- < �r .._..
,.0
92 275.
... • n
11 /�1)]r93.....
-
�
9.1GCJC%
912.59
13
53,9:2.53
87,825.00
'
5/01/1 =';1
50,003.00
637.50
15,6;7.53
83,275.00
5!01'/19)7
5O,C00.00
9.25000%
16,G37.S0
66,637.`50
it/ -1/t )Y
' .
="'
14,32S.00
zvc :0: -...103;650.00
-
'
OO.OJ
...4,430:+'
...10,E09.
" CO
96,607.09
I1 /01 /19.B
5/91/19:3
75,000.00
9.5070%
10,000.-3
7,237.50
Li,57J.SJ
1,237.53
11/01/1M
-
75,000.00
9 6000 05
7 237.50
L2,237.50 _
...89,475.
-
5101 12000
1.1/01/2003 :..
.. •.:
''-
:.:.:5..:.:�
637 S0
3,637.50
M637.50
82,M.03
5/91/2:01
75,000.09
9.70000%
-
339,4%,5.67
937,5o5.67
939,92>5.b7
{ SC1 AL
600,000.00
Ehters and Acecclates
F1rr. xfa! A:.'�ia�n
YIELD STAIISIICS
Aara.1 mterast frcn 04/15114`27 to 04/151
t .verav tifa ....... ...............................
acrd Ye: rs ... ...............................
A a "a0 CJ4:101 ............... I ................
....
Net Ict *_r e:.; 'gat (NIC). ........... I .............
'field for Ar4itre7e Pur¢osoe ............
TrCa Ir:tereSt Cost (TIC).. ...................
EffactA s Inrere5t Cost (EIC) ..... I ..........
.
FILE a H:771.£DLD
3 /lil19? 4:53 Pm
6.044 YSA4S
3,625.:
9.37:1324%
9.37;632 »%
9.336731/,:
9.3359315%
9.333;316%
0
0
E
City of !u[L Altr+ %ota
Gov Li L•rary D.nd3
rtgT SL2VICE $V:GGLE
PR1tiC!N.L C:L'F ri 10SEST mf StaYic'c /1 S AL IOTA.
5/01/1:71
--
19 049.75
19,C43.75
11 /C1 /1`Y 1
5 /31 /f 992
r
50 OJD.00 -
r
S.C�3JK
17,G ^x3.75
6T 493.75
.
86 ,
.
11 /01 /KS2
5/31/1 ^ Fr3.:':
57,0)0.00:
•.
:a:2:OGJ%
16,2243.75_
15,2:3:75::' -:.
..16,243.75
;.6,243.71:
..
82.437.
11/01/17)3
5.40900%
14,9-3.75
14,943.75
1,,4 43.77
64,943.75
79,.^.37:53
5/01/1;94
50,030.00
13,5993.75
13,5 ?3.75
11/01/1;9:
5 /C1 /1Sri
-
50,000.00
S.fO:)7X
13,573.75
63,5)3. 5
'12,193.n
77,187.50
ft/01/iSY3.
5/0111 , 1465 0
OJJ.CO5
iv rOGK
12;193'77 -.....
12,193.75
62, 193.75
,...
74,387.50
11/01/14;4
5/01/1977
50,000.00
5.9CAOCX
10,156.25
1),776.25
19,756.25
60,756.cS
71,51250
11/01/191?7.,_,
75, G��. C�:;:'
9,231.25
:9,2c1.25._E-
9,2 ?1.25
'.,211.25
..'.-.93,562.50
.G.C57C'.C''..:.:-
7,031.25
7 ,031.25
1110111:73
5/0111S'4)
75,000.03
G.t00C0X
7,031.25
82,031.25
4,7',3.75
89,062.50
11/01/19:3
5/01/2379
75,003.00
6,25007%
4,743.75
4,743.75
79,71,3.75
8: 487.50
6 40000'
2,- 0).G0':.r
Z,40).C3
2,40.C3
77,4G''.CJ
.. .
79,8]0.70
5/ov 20'1
75,090.00
T01•L
6"3 000 00
213,917.50
813,917,53
813,•)17,50
FILE • NJTLttrEU
Enlars and Asseefat63
311'./1;41 4:51 PH
flnanc(al Advisors
YIELD STATISTICS
Accrue] Interest frcn 0-/13/1 ^ 11 to 6 .. a, S
A 22rAp Ltf o ....... ............................... J r_y a7
DOM Two ......... ............................... 6 •.t '.
Not Interest Cost ( 'tic) ...........................
Ocrd Yleld fer ArbitraV PurP,0"s .................
True Interest Colt (TIC) ..........................
Effective Interest Cost (EIC) .....................
I
O 1
Cit of outoomon, Alrr.idotl
Fpc!4 4/15/1-'1
PRINCIPAL l NW 1.3f D/S n143 NEI 0/3 s11p;GS
FiS:AL TVAL
19,049
77,412.5D
13, P.07 Q
9
50'03O'co
17
16,243.75
67,493-n
16,20.75
25,387.50
9 t43.7;
71 /C 1/1952
is, 2 Irs
... —
"6s 2. 3.75::.
'?,143,75
13,2 57
5/21/19;3
11301/1793
50'00-00
'
14,943:75
14'943:75
23,237,50
8,343.75
8,343.75
16,b315)
13'5;3.75
73,2£7 .
21,137.')
7,543.75
11/01111�
64
13,393m
13,593.n
71,137.5)
7,543.75
15,°327.50
......
.......
. 4 6,713.73
6,713.75
13, 437:50
50,00) 03
12,173.7
10,M.25
62,173.n
10,7-36.23
63,912-53
16,637.53
5,,81 .25
-
11,
1
it /u 117%
5/01/19 r7
50,000.00
13,756 25
60,756.25
66, 637. 1 )
14,325.0
81.
5,825
5 V,3'.75
1 752. 50
11/cl/1977
9 221:25
- *9,281.Z1.
9,231 25
ni.25
� -
'
5 3175 -
lo Dw.cr
75,63).01
.
7,031.25
I I ..
7,031.25
10,£03.:9
7!8.75
3,
18
7,031.25
82,C.31.n
85ECOM
3,76 ,3.75
7,537.50
SM/1991?
75,000.CO
4,743.71
4,4,743.7i
7 5)
2, 493.75
-
310/n,
75,C00.00
4,743,75
79,743.75
82, 237 .53
-.
2,493.75
237�53
'
2,40.0
-2 4r3
77:400:1.5
5:637*50
1237.50
2,475.CO
5/Inni
i5 , C6.3 . 0 0
2,400.03
600,001-00
213,917-53
813,917.50
939,q36.67
121,069.17
121
TOTAL
FILE z rJTLE2S'4
Ehlere ard Asscelatts
3/19/1991 4:52 Pr4
firiancl6i. Advisors
GRZISS
PSlEg? WILLA DEST ssAvlCE MV114GS
Ot hor
Ca--,7fit$ ..............................
r s it
to Debt Servlce FLrd ................
A?cunt
released frm Prior
l CSR FLw'da ........
0 . ^r
00339 ... I ..... I
............ I.. : .... I
c esh C--A." flwticl ..............................
Trtr.f0ts from Prier I slut
Dg tarylct Fund
UT PRESENT
VALUE, tE4FFIl
$96,723.11
0
0
S
z;
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Mail Station 3340
St. Paul, Minnesota 55146 -3340
(612) 296 -5141
•
Ll
March 8, 1991
TO: All City Clerks
FOR YOUR INFORMAT_ku'
Recently, 1991 Laws, Chapter 2 was enacted to reduce 1991 state expenditures by
approximately $200,000,000. Aid payments to !ocal units of government comprise a
significant portion of state expenditures. As a result, Article 8 of this new law provides for
a $50,000,000 reduction in the July 20, 1991 aid payments to counties, cities, towns and
special taxing. districts.
The enclosed aid estimates have been developed for your information. The July 20, 1991
estimated aid payment reduction shown in the first column on the enclosed aid notice is
your city's share of the $50,000,000 aid payment reduction. The July 20, 1991 estimated
aid payment for your city after this reduction is shown in the second column.
The enclosed aid estimates are based on preliminary 1991 property tax information. Final
1991 property tax information is not currently available but will be used in determining the
actual July 20, 1991 aid payments. For this reason, the actual July 20, 1991 payment may
be different than the enclosed estimate. Any differences between the enclosed estimates
and the actual payment should not be significant.
The December 15, 1991 estimated payment shown in the third column reflects the
provisions of current law. Additional aid payment reductions will be enacted into law in
1991. These additional aid reductions will probably result in the December payment being
reduced the same as the July payment and will also result in decreases in 1992 aid
payments.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me in the Local Government
Services Division of the Department of Revenue. My telephone number is (612) 296 -5141.
Sincerely,
LARRY(BEWLEY, Research Analysis Specialist
Local Government Services Division
LLB /glh
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION
MAIL STATIC14 3340
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55146 -3340
PHONE: (612) 296 -5141
MARCH 8, 1991
CLERK - TREASURER
CITY HALL
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
37 WASHINGTON AVE W
HUTCHI145011 MH 55350
x THE JULY 20, 1991 AID REDUCTION AND PAYMENT ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY
1991 PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION. FINAL 1991 PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION IS NOT
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE BUT WILL BE USED IN DETERMINING THE ACTUAL JULY 20, 1991
AID PAYMENTS. FOR THIS REASON, THE ACTUAL JULY 20, 1991 PAYMENT 14AY BE
DIFFERENT THAN THE ABOVE ESTIMATE. ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ESTIMATE AND
THE ACTUAL PAYMENT SHOULD NOT BE SIGNIFICANT.
*x THE DECEMBER 15, 1991 ESTIMATED PAYMENT REFLECTS THE PROVISIONS OF CURRENT LAW.
MORE THAN LIKELY THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL AID PAYMENT REDUCTIONS ENACTED INTO
LAN IN 1991. THESE ADDITIONAL AID REDUCTIONS WILL PROBABLY RESULT IN THE
DECEMBER PAYMENT BEING REDUCED THE SAME AS THE JULY PAYMENT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS NOTICE, PLEASE CONTACT LARRY BEWLEY IN THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. LARRY'S TELEPHONE
NUMBER IS (612) 296 -5141.
1.
•
u
ESTIMATED JULY 20, 1991 AID
REDUCTION FOR YOUR
CITY
UNDER LAWS 1991, CHAPTER
2, ARTICLE 8 AND
THE
RESULTING ESTIMATED 1991
AID AMOUNTS AFTER REDUCTION
JULY 20, 1991
DEC. 15;
1991
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED AID
ESTIMATED AID
JULY 20, 1991
PAYMENT AFTER
PAYMENT
UNDER
AID REDUCTION x
REDUCTION x
CURRENT
LAW Xx
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AID
$ 78,822
S 517,169
S
595,991
EQUALIZATION AID
$ 0
$ 99,113
$
99,113
HSTD & AG CREDIT
AID
$ 0
$ 418,133
$
418,133
DISPARITY REDUCT
AID
$ 0
$ 15,364
$
15,364
TOTAL
$ 78,822
$ 1,049,779
$ 1,128,601
x THE JULY 20, 1991 AID REDUCTION AND PAYMENT ESTIMATES ARE BASED ON PRELIMINARY
1991 PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION. FINAL 1991 PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION IS NOT
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE BUT WILL BE USED IN DETERMINING THE ACTUAL JULY 20, 1991
AID PAYMENTS. FOR THIS REASON, THE ACTUAL JULY 20, 1991 PAYMENT 14AY BE
DIFFERENT THAN THE ABOVE ESTIMATE. ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE ESTIMATE AND
THE ACTUAL PAYMENT SHOULD NOT BE SIGNIFICANT.
*x THE DECEMBER 15, 1991 ESTIMATED PAYMENT REFLECTS THE PROVISIONS OF CURRENT LAW.
MORE THAN LIKELY THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL AID PAYMENT REDUCTIONS ENACTED INTO
LAN IN 1991. THESE ADDITIONAL AID REDUCTIONS WILL PROBABLY RESULT IN THE
DECEMBER PAYMENT BEING REDUCED THE SAME AS THE JULY PAYMENT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THIS NOTICE, PLEASE CONTACT LARRY BEWLEY IN THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES DIVISION IN THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. LARRY'S TELEPHONE
NUMBER IS (612) 296 -5141.
1.
•
u
DAVID B.AR.NOLD
GARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. HARRY ANDERSON'
ETEVEN S. HOOE
LAURA K. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRVEOOEMAIN
PAUL D. BOVE
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
JULIA A.CHHISTIANS
HICHARD O. MCOEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSEI
March 21, 1991
AI?NOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAw
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. BARRY ANDERSON
OF COUNSEL
CHARLES R. CARMICHAEL"
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
3881 CEDAR IAXE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-30.1 -4345
FAX(612)545-1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389-2214
PAX (612) 389 -5506
David Luick, P.E.
Twin City Testing, Inc.
662 Cromwell Avenue
St. Paul, Mn. 55114
Jeff Bergo
Environet, Inc.
7351 Washington Avenue South
Edina, Mn. 55439 -2407
John Moeger
• Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, Mn. 55155
Omar Collis
302 South Lakeside
Lake Crystal, Mn. 56055
Mike Commerford
Mike's Mobil, Inc.
Hwy 15 South
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Greg Scoville
PACE Laboratories, Inc.
1710 Douglas Drive North
Minneapolis, Mn. 55422
Re: Mike's Mobil Tank Removal
Our File No. 3244 -89 -0031
Gentlemen:
It is % understanding that most
from the Mike's Mobil structure,
related material remain and those
• 1991.
of the selvage has been removed
although shelving, pumps and
items will be removed by April 1,
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE RAH ASSOCIATION
- CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
Re: Mike's Mobil Tank Removal
March 21, 1991
Page 2
It is also my understanding that Mr. Collis pursuant to his
agreement with the City has made arrangements or is making
arrangements with an appropriately licensed contractor for the
removal of the tanks from the Mike's Mobil site. I am also ad-
vised that he has been in contact with the MPCA. Tank removal
is scheduled for next week, perhaps as early as Monday. I men-
tion this issue because at various times the MPCA has suggested
that it might want to be present when the tanks are removed.
Finally, asbestos removal, to the extent there is any in this
structure, and demolition, in that order, can commence after
April 1, 1991.
I am sending this letter as
that have been given to me.
schedule as outlined, please
Engineer.
a confirmation of the various dates
If anyone has a problem with the
contact either myself or the City
Thank you.
Best personal regards.
Vejry tAnd ,
ARELL /
G. son
G BA:mb
cc: Gary Plotz
•
� \NN �T4
'eOF TRP
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
BOX 768
2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
WILLMAR, MINNESOTA 56201
March 14, 1991
George Field
Hutchinson Safety Council President
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Safety Council Traffic Control Concerns
Dear Mr. Field:
�
•1
Y
Thank you for your letter dated January 18,199 1, regarding lane striping concerns in Hutchinson.
David Ekem has asked me to respond for him. I apologize for the lateness of this letter. I am
aware of the problems that we are experiencing at the junction of Highways 15 and 7 with the
lack of visible paint stripes. Our Metro District did repaint the intersection the fast part of
February; however, a recent review has indicated that the markings are losing their effectiveness
also.
• We have several intersections around the State that we are experiencing similar problems with
and we are working with our Central Office Traffic Office and Research Office to develop more
permanent solutions. We have also looked at placing signs designating the location of the turn
lanes and found that the mast arms do not extend far enough to mount these signs. We will
continue to review this issue.
Your concerns regarding the turning movements at the intersection of Trunk Highways 22 and
15 will be addressed on the striping plan for Highway 15 through downtown Hutchinson.
Our District Traffic Engineer, Keith Voss, and I would be happy to
discuss the proposed options for the intersection of Highways 7 and
the options available for the intersection of Highways 22 and 15.
Sincerely,
H n, P.E.
istri aintenance Engineer
cc: Gsfy Platz - City Administrator
John Rodeberg - Director of Engineering
David S. Ekern
• Keith Voss
An Equal Opportunity Employer
meet with your group to
15. We could also discuss
MINNE50'rA
]990
•
0
I
DATE: March 2, 1991
FOR YOUR �`1NN
TO:
Members
of the
Hutchinson
City Planning Commission
FROM:
William
Weber,
Consulting
Planner
SUBJECT: Responses to Your Questions on the Draft zoning Ordinance
Jim Marka sent to me written comments and questions that were posed
by Jim and yourselves about the draft zoning ordinance. As Jim and
I discussed, I will provide #answers in this memo to your specific
questions and arrange a date to meet with you in person for a
better discussion. We will assume that other comments or
instructions for changes will be automatically incorporated into
the next draft of the ordinance unless I feel that it is in your
interest to discuss them. In that case, I will raise those issues
in this memo.
The page references below pertain to the pages in the first draft
of the zoning ordinance on which were written comments and
questions.
Table of Contents:
The proposed numbering system will allow pages to be inserted or
deleted without having to renumber the entire ordinance.
Page 3 -6:
There is no difference between a supervised living facility" and
a "group home. However, the difference between these two and a
"boarding home" is that in a boarding home there is no personal .
supervision; it is more like an apartment building in w afor
share bath and eating facilities and meals are prepared
tenants. In the definition of "group home, " 'I think that we should
be careful not to give the impression that only children live in a
aroun home, as these facilities can be for adults who need
supervised living arrangements, also.
I do not think that the term "spot zoning" is used in the
ordinance. If it is not, then there is no need to have it in the
list of definitions. If we find it, we will define it.
Page 3 -13:
Page 6 -7:
I do not think that the Ordinance should specify that site plans
should be designed by a Registered Land Surveyor since members of
that profession, while excellent at preparing surveys, are usually
nct highly skilled at site planning. Rather, the Ordinance should
1
require that the boundary
Registered Land Surveyor
site plan.
Page 8 -7:
and topographic surveys be prepared by a
and be silent on who should prepare the •
The work "Permitted" is probably not necessary before the term
"Principal Uses."
Page 8 -8 and 8 -9:
The minimum lot area for single - family homes in the R -2 District
should have been 9,100 square feet and the minimum width 75 feet.
The minimum lot width for single - family homes in the R -3 District
should have been 65 feet. This makes a better progression in lot
areas from the R -1 District (10,800 square feet) to the R -2 19,100
square feet) to the R -3 (8,500 square feet).
Page 8 -8:
Regarding the additional Conditional Uses you have suggested, I do
not think the city would be well advised to allow in this
relatively low- density residential district such activities as
nursing homes, private clubs, lodges and fraternal organizations,
mortuaries or funeral homes, transportable (mobile) homes, medical
or dental clinics not exceeding 5,000 square - feet, offices not
exceeding 5,000 square feet, or licensed boarding homes for the
elderly. I specifically left those activities out because I felt
it would be wiser policy to segregate residential and commercial
activities.
Page 8 -8d
Regarding the prohibition of shrubbery dividers on boundary lines
of common wall dwellings, I agree that this is not necessary.
Page 8 -11:
Four - six -eight family buildings: These are much different from
apartment buildings and that is why they were called out separately
from apartments in this Ordinance. Four's, six's, and eight's
usually have a lower height and bulk than apartments buildings,
usually have parking under the building, usually have more yard
area and are more likely to be owner - occupied. That is why four's,
six's, eight's and twonhouses but not apartment buildings are
allowed in the R -3 District. It is also why the lot area
requirements differ for four's to eight's versus apartments.
Page 8 -12:
•
The benefit of a density bonus for parking spaces under the
building is to encourage this feature which creates at least as
2
much green space than is lost by the bonus. The bonus for
balconies is to encourage the creation of these spaces which are
the most highly used outdoor spaces for apartments dwellers.
Page 8 -15:
I think it would be better if the width of streets in a mobile home
park were kept reasonably narrow so as not to encourage high speed
traffic. I would recommend 32 feet for local access streets
although 36 feet is suitable for collector streets if the mobile
home park is large enough to need such as street.
Page 8 -28:
Even though development in the I/C District would be allowed only
by Conditional Use Permit, the Ordinance should still specify
setbacks.
Page 8 -29:
outdoor "laydown" areas for industry should be screened from view
from the public street by fencing and landscaping.
Page 8 -37:
The Planned Development District should only be used on special
• occasions when there is a clear public benefit available by
departing from a strict application of the requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance. It should not be used as a means of
circumventing the zoning regulations for the mere convenience of
the applicant but, rather, should be used to create a better
project than would otherwise be possible under the zoning
regulations.
Planned Development Districts (or Planned -Unit Districts as they
are sometimes called) have been widely accepted as a means of
accomplishing design ideas that were not specifically contemplated
by the zoning ordinance. The PDD can be especially useful if a
developer proposes combining two different types of development
(e.g., commercial and residential) on one site or when a developer
proposes to cluster development in one part of the site in exchange
for leaving open a more sensitive part of the site.
The Planning Commission and City Council should exercise some
judgement in deciding whether to rezone a site to PDD so as to
allow setback variances or greater density. Sometimes a developer
will request such a rezoning just to increase the density but does
nct create a superior design or neighborhood benefit in return.
Similarly, subjective judgement is required in reviewing site plans
under the PDD since the normal standards of the zoning ordinance
are set aside and the design features negotiated.
1 J
3
In all cases, the Land Use Plan and existing zoning should berused
as reference points when reviewing site plans and plats the
PDD. This is because the Land Use Plan and zoning map have
established expectations for the neighboring property owners, and
those expectations should not be shattered by the use of the PDD.
For this reason, the draft ordinance would only allow a residential
density increase of 10 percent over the existing zoning density.
Land should not be rezoned to PDD in advance of an application by
the landowner or prospective developer. This is so that the City
does not give away this valuable property right without receiving
anything in return.
The draft ordinance proposes that the minimum tract size for
rezoning to PDD be five acres rather than the current three acres.
The thinking here is that a sufficiently large site is needed to
accomplish the creative design that is contemplated by the PDD and
to lessen somewhat the number of instances in which the PDD is
used. This number is subjective and there is nothing magic about
five acres but I think it moves toward the desired objective.
Page 9 -1:
The summary table of dimensional requirements will be updated to
reflect changes in the body of the ordinance. Also, minimum lots
widths will be indicated by zoning district. •
Page 9 -2:
Lot width should always be measured at the front building setback
line.
I do not think that it is
coverage because the setback
In addition, the setbacks
conflict.
Page 9 =3:
necessary to regulate maximum lot
regulations will take care of that.
and maximum lot coverage sometimes
Freight and other limitations of
specified in another section of
Also, the Airport Safety Zones
according to the Land Use Plan.
the Airport Safety Zones will be
the Ordinance and summarized here.
should be shown on the Zoning Map
Page 10 -2:
industrial "laydown" areas are outdoor storage and should be
regulated by Conditional Use Permit.
•
Ell
Page 10 -2:
• Access drives should be narrower than public streets. In most
cases, access drives do not need to be wider than 26 feet.
Page 10 -12:
I will research other ordinances pertaining to excavation, mining
and filling.
Page 10 -14:
I would suggest that the City establish some definite regulations
about when a pole barn can be used and its maximum size so as to
reduce the amount of subjective judgement required in reviewing
this problematic type of building.
Pages 10 -15, 10 -16 and 10 -17:
Noise: since the City probably does not have a noise meter,
perhaps Section (3) ought to involve a more subjective measurement
of noise nuisance. The same goes for section (5), Smoke, Section
(7), Fly Ash Dust and Fumes', and Section (9), Heat. The source of
this text was the current Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance, pages 90 and
91.
is
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to
and concerns. I look forward to meeting
discuss these and other matters further.
some of your questions
with you personally to
•
5
p le c --- m p A c,. s c .J -------
Crnn /ra,
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
J
I
-- - --
- - -�7�
iT-
-
- r.
/�
11 1
1171
r
7'ewe —
.
.SAN
....
I
...
P
16
-1192.
2,2C]!�
7
-1
7/
112z.
7.Z.
i.
.2 Iq I
- .R J
-�t
-dr
7
I
_.,15�
- -t
7f
I
-.
Y/z
/05
_. ;ss
I
-- j
j4/yA
5
It
If
1?4
7
Ljq3
.2 os�j
-5.qq4-.
4 us,
I I I
21"7
)
)2
!y
6 TI-
s 037 1
+
z
20
F
12
lit
13
901
oy
9
2Lk 2
167
0
F--3
12
US
1 7�
7-6
-
5 t.
-J
-Z
12
zi v
61
lit
±IZ
E
-
6
4
2�
i
2k
25
I L07
1.16
�33
-
-voy,
jj
15.1
141
Vj
2
I
V?
17
1
1#1
--J7
1774
—..7 -Z 1�
:.f 7i
Z4
91
96
__j
V
2
'73
_,.I
7;
A3_
q(.
20
LU
21.7
is
-L--1-
fi
S)
2
h si—
f .
. . . . . . .
w i
T-1
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
•
•
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL
Income Statement for Periods Ended February 28, 1991 and 1990
YTO ANALYSIS
REVENUE A EXPENSE
----'---------- --
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
MET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits
Professional Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts i Repsir
Food, Drugs i Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
Total Operating Expense
OPERATING MARGIN
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
MET INCOME (LOSS)
REVENUE S EXPENSE
... ..............
TOTAL REVENUE
Discounts
MET OPERATING REVENUE
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries
Benefits ProfessionalProfessisl Fees
Medical Fees
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts 8 Repairs
Food, Drugs 1 Supplies
Other Expenses
Depreciation
Interest
s 76,660 2.79% 82,316 3.06% (5,656) -6.87%
338,518 12.34% 309,932 11.53% 28,586 9.221
106,072 3.87% 76,929 2.86% 29,143 37.88%
77,703 2.83% 79,316 2.95% (1,615) -2.04%
25,527 0.93% 25,013 0.93% 514 2.06%
............ ............ --------------- -- - - --
2,137,989 77.94% 2,089,247 77.71% 48,743 2.33%
98,027 3.57% 34,875 1.30% 63,152 181.08%
46,56( 1.70% 48,836 1.82% (2,272) -4.65%
1",590 5.27% 83,711 3.11% 60,860 72.73%
TTD ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
YTD Feb 91 %of YTO Feb 90 %of Increase Percent
Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Variance
................................ ...............................
2,743,187 100.00% 2,309,301 100.00% 433,886 18.79%
(507,171) -18.49% (330,586) -14.32% (176,585) 53.42%
............ ............ --------------- - -- - --
2,236,016 81.51% 1,978,715 85.68% 257,301 13.00%
............ ---- --- - - --- .....................
1,048,121 38.21% 895,400 38.772 152,721 17.062
227,328 8.29% 222,125 9.62% 5,203 2.34%
92,108 3.36% 61,731 2.67% 30,377 49.21%
145,952 5.32X 102,728 4.45% 43,224 42.08%
76,660 2.79% 71,031 3.08% 5,629 7.92%
338,518 12.34% 270,018 11.69% 68,500 25.37%
106,072 3.87% 77,003 3.33% 29,069 37.75%
77,703 2.83% 76,070 3.29% 1,633 2.15%
25,527 0.93% 7,032 0.30% 18,495 263.01%
............ ............ --------------- -- - - --
Total Operating Expanse 2,137,989 77.94% 1,783,137 77.222 354,852 19.901
OPERATING MARGIN 96,027 3.57% 195,578 8.47% (97,551) - 49.88%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 46,564 1.701 37,939 1.64% 8,625 22.73%
............ ............ .....................
MET INCOME (LOSS) 144,590 5.27% 233,517 10.11% (88,926) -38.08%
............ sus.swu ............ a.a ..... .
BID
TIC ACTUAL TO GET
TTO Feb 91 %
%of Y
YTO Feb 91 %
%of I
Increase P
Percent
Actin T
Total B
Budget T
Total (
(Decrease) V
Variance
2,743,187 1
100.00% 2
2,688,612 1
100.001 5
54,575 2
2.03%
(507,171) -
- 18.49% (
(564,490) -
- 21.00% 5
57,319 -
- 10.15%
2,236,016 8
---- -
-- - - - - -- -
79.00% 1
--------------- -
- - ----
1,048,121 3
------ -
- - - - -- .
38.85% 3
.....................
0.35%
227,328 8
8.291 2
232,094 8
8.63% (
(4,766) -
-2.05%
92,108 3
3.36% 8
81,347 3
3.013% 1
10,761 1
13.23%
145,952 5
5.32% 1
157,812 5
5.87% (
(11,860) -
-7.52%
98,027 3.57% 34,875 1.30% 63,152 181.08%
46,56( 1.70% 48,836 1.82% (2,272) -4.65%
1",590 5.27% 83,711 3.11% 60,860 72.73%
TTD ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
YTD Feb 91 %of YTO Feb 90 %of Increase Percent
Actual Total Actual Total (Decrease) Variance
................................ ...............................
2,743,187 100.00% 2,309,301 100.00% 433,886 18.79%
(507,171) -18.49% (330,586) -14.32% (176,585) 53.42%
............ ............ --------------- - -- - --
2,236,016 81.51% 1,978,715 85.68% 257,301 13.00%
............ ---- --- - - --- .....................
1,048,121 38.21% 895,400 38.772 152,721 17.062
227,328 8.29% 222,125 9.62% 5,203 2.34%
92,108 3.36% 61,731 2.67% 30,377 49.21%
145,952 5.32X 102,728 4.45% 43,224 42.08%
76,660 2.79% 71,031 3.08% 5,629 7.92%
338,518 12.34% 270,018 11.69% 68,500 25.37%
106,072 3.87% 77,003 3.33% 29,069 37.75%
77,703 2.83% 76,070 3.29% 1,633 2.15%
25,527 0.93% 7,032 0.30% 18,495 263.01%
............ ............ --------------- -- - - --
Total Operating Expanse 2,137,989 77.94% 1,783,137 77.222 354,852 19.901
OPERATING MARGIN 96,027 3.57% 195,578 8.47% (97,551) - 49.88%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 46,564 1.701 37,939 1.64% 8,625 22.73%
............ ............ .....................
MET INCOME (LOSS) 144,590 5.27% 233,517 10.11% (88,926) -38.08%
............ sus.swu ............ a.a ..... .
............ ............ --------------- -- - - --
Total Operating Expanse 2,137,989 77.94% 1,783,137 77.222 354,852 19.901
OPERATING MARGIN 96,027 3.57% 195,578 8.47% (97,551) - 49.88%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) 46,564 1.701 37,939 1.64% 8,625 22.73%
............ ............ .....................
MET INCOME (LOSS) 144,590 5.27% 233,517 10.11% (88,926) -38.08%
............ sus.swu ............ a.a ..... .
HUTCHINSON HOSPITAL .
Incase StataseM for Months Ended February 28, .1991 and 1990
MONTHLY ANALYSIS
LIRRENT MONTS - ACTUAL TO BUDGET
CURRENT MONTN - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
Fab 91
%f
Feb 91
Xof
Increase
Percent
REVENUE 1 EXPENSE
- -- -------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Actual
Total
Budget
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
TOTAL REVENUE
1,333,440
100.00%
1,236,820
100.00%
96,620
7.812
Discounts
------
(290,864)
- - - -
- 21.81%
(253,316)
-20.48%
(37,548)
14.82%
NET OPERATING REVENUE
--
1,042,576
............
78.19%
943,504
---------------
79.52%
59,072
- - - - --
6.01%
OPERATINGEXPENSES: ------------
.....................
87.25%
------------
19.78%
-
---------- ---
- - - - - --
Salaries
491,000
36.82%
493,414
39.93%
(2,814)
-0.57%
Benefits
102,838
7.71%
109,749
8.87%
(6,911)
-6.30%
Professional Fees
",752
3.36X
39561
3.2OX
5,191
13.12%
Medical Fees
62, "3
4.68%
71336
5.77%
(8,893)
- 12.47%
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts % Repairs
34,579
2.59%
41158
3.33%
(6,579)
- 15.98%
Food Drugs t Supplies -
155,650
11.67%
139,762
11.30%
15,888
11.37%
Other Expenses
51,330
3.85%
38163
3.09%
13,167
34.50%
Depreciation
38,825
2.91%
39,689
3.21%
(864)
-2.18%
Interest
............
12,852
0.9"
12,432
1.01%
420
3.38%
Total Operating Expense
............
994,269
------
74.56X
- - - - --
985,664
---------------
79.69%
8,605
- - - ---
0.87%
OPERATING MARGIN
48,307
-------
3.62%
-----
(2,160)
---------------
- 0.17%
-"'"-
50,467 - 2336. "%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE) .-
-- 20,023
1.50%
24,418
......
1.97%
(4,395)
- 18.00%
MET INCOME (LOSS)
68,330
5.125
22,258
----
1.80%
------- ----------
46,072
206.99%
CURRENT MONTN - ACTUAL TO ACTUAL
Feb 91
%of
Feb 90
%of
Increase
Percent
REVENUE % EXPENSE
.................
Actual
Total
Actual
Total
(Decrease)
Variance
---------""---------------------------------------------------
TOTAL REVENUE
1,333,"0
100.00%
997,594
100.00%
335,846
33.67%
Discounts
-
(290,864)
- 21.81%
(127,174)
- 12.752
(163,690)
128.71%
MET OPERATING REVEMM
----- ------
1,042,576
-----
78.19%
- ------
870,420
.....................
87.25%
172,156
19.78%
OPERATINGEXPENSES: ............
............
.................
. . ..
Salaries
491,000
36.82%
415,368
41.64%
75,632
18.21%
Benefits
102,838
7.71%
108,105
10.84%
(5,267)
-4.87%
Professional Fees
",752
3-M
35,087
3.52%
9,665
27.55%
Medical Fees
62,"3
4.68%
38,437
3.85%
24,006
62.462
-
Utilities, Mtnce Contracts S Repairs
34,579
2.59%
27,629
2.77%
6,950
25.15%
Food Drugs i Supplies
155,650
11.67%
107,148
10.74%
48,502
45.27%
Other Expenses
$1,330
3.85%
32,273
3.24%
19,057
$9.05%
Depreciation
38,123
2.91%
36,236
3.632
2,50
7.14%
Interest
............
12,852
0.96X
3,472
0.35%
9,380
270.1"
l
Total Operating Expense
.......
994,269
..-----
74.5 6%
-. - --
803,755
-----------------
80.57%
190,514
- ---
23.70%
OPERATING MARGIN
....
48,307
------------
3.62%
66,665
---------------
6.68%
(18,358)
- - - - --
- 27.54%
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE (EXPENSE)
............
20,023
1.502
17,593
1.76%
2,430
13.81%
.
MET INCOME (LOSS)
68,330
............
5.12%
84,258
.....................
8.45X
(15,928)
- 18.90%
uvaa.o.a
a.aaa...oas
ussasmm.m.ma
_^J n
0..v �
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY Board Meeting SYSV;X FOR YOUR INFORMAT N
Executive etin
February 11, 1991
Members present: Ric Emery Representing: Willmar
William Scherer • Hutchinson
Arlen LaCombe • Big Stone County
Carol Conradi Willmar
Noel Phifer Glencoe
Others present: Burton Sundberg, Director
Kathy Matson, Associate Director
David Lauritsen, Chippewa County Librarian
The meeting was called to order by President Emery at 7:32 p.m.
Motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes of the January 14, 1991, meeting
(Scherer / Conradi), carried.
Motion was made and seconded to approve the financial report (Conradi /LaCombe), carried.
Director's Report:
1. On January 28, Mr. Sundberg attended a meeting on telecommunications. He reported
on project STARS (State Telecommunication Agency Resource System) and how they are
developing freeways for telecommunications that would help our 31 locations in 9
counties tie into the network.
2. Kathy Matson reported on library usage and that 1991 was off to a good start.
She passed around newspaper clippings and drew the board's attention to articles
pertaining to cutting hours at the Kandiyohi County libraries. She indicated that
several libraries received a free camera from the Polaroid Company. She also handed
out information on a reference workshop to be held in March for all staff interested
in reviewing skills in this area.
• 3. Marie Pederson, from Montevideo, was selected as the Employee of the Month for
February.
4. The Committee on Hispanic Services will meet on February 25.
5. The Automation Committee will travel to Mankato on February 12 to view a demonstra-
tion of their automated circulation system.
Motion was made and seconded to pay all bills (LaCombe /Scherer), carried.
Ric Emery gave a SAMMIE update. He indicated a job description was developed for the
Coordinator and for the administrative assistant. Be also indicated that interlibrary
loan usage was up 318.
A list of the people possibly attending the MLA Legislative Day on February 28 was
distributed along with the concerns to be covered.
Communications:
1. Burton Sundberg reported receiving a check for $90,000 from the State Office of
Library Development and Services. This check was $235 less than expected. After con-
tacting them, another check for $235 will be sent.
2. Burton Sundberg received a letter of thanks from MLA for the contribution of
$97.91 for the legislative effort of MLA.
Old and New Business:
1. Motion was made and seconded to authorize the Director to renew the Automation Fund
CD for $9,000 following the usual procedure (Scherer /LaCombe), carried.
• 2. The following committees were appointed:
Executive Board (at -large members):
Marie Schoener, Meeker County _
Orville Rudningen, Swift County
Personnel Committee:
Dorothy Tebben, Chippewa County
Nancy Alsop, Litchfield
Ric Emery, Willmar
Monte Matheson, Ortonville
Nancy Aaseth, Bird Island
Finance Committee:
Arlen LaCombe, Big Stone County
Carol Conradi, Willmar
Orville Rudningen, Swift County
William Scherer, Hutchinson
John Nevins, Dawson
Automation Committee:
Jan Kreie, McLeod County
Delores Brunner, Hutchinson
Nancy Alsop, Litchfield
John Schulstad, Madison
Mary Henke, Hutchinson, staff
David Lauritsen, Chippewa County, staff
Pat Cina, Benson, staff
Kathie Behrens, Madison, staff
Earleen Warner, Willmar, staff
Public Relations:
Debra Farwell, Big Stone County
Dorothy Tebben, Chippewa County
Ric Emery, Kandiyohi County
Kathie Behrens, Lac Qui Parle County
Noel Phifer, McLeod County
Nancy Alsop, Meeker County
Helen Mahnke, Renville County
Pat Cina, Swift County
Virginia Putnam, Yellow Medicine County
The full board will meet on Monday, March 11, 1991.
The meeting was adjourned.
Noel Phifer
Secretary
0
•
is
ML /DIANNF
1
tl •i5 11 FUND
L10KAAY _.__._.
VIUNLERLANU Lid SVS
INTLGRATEU FIN AL SY]T[M
REVENUE GUI ELINE
CAROL CONRAOI, TREASURER, PLS
C OUVIY 3, h'ERRUARY 1991
IFS101 PAGt
AS OF 2 191 FJ9: 3 /04 /YI ll:s4:n9
PERCENT OF YEAR 17%
I
COUNT.. _ DESCRCPTION _
CURRENT
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BOGT - ACT
•
9UDGEY
TN1S -MONTH
Yt AM-FO -DATE
DIFFERENCE
PCT
•• ALANCE CARRIED FORWARD
L _
1
$ 06,037.65
$136,439.17
RECEIPTS
• 010 ECEPTS
- -" V
5101) RESERVE
29,514.00
.00
.00
70.514.00
U
._5101 5ASIC_STATE /FEDERAL AID
165.900.00
115.00
Y3.235.Ou
174,735.00
25
5101 7t0ERAL ESTABLISHMFNT GAANT
15.1!1.00
.00
.OU
1>.121.00
J
S11U 51G STONE COUNTY
22,977.00
.00
5,741.25
17.224.75
25
5115 CHIPPEWA COUNTY
77.2V5.9U
.JO
17,123.75
57.471.25
25
J
5120 KANOTYOHI COUNTY
116.n00.00
.00
19.000.00
07.000.1)0
25
J
• S1ZZ LAC OUT PARLE COUNTY
(1,677.00
on
7 1 910.15
23.754.Ts
25
• _. -312( ML LE0010UNTY._
75.126.01)
.00
13,761.SJ
50.344.50
25
'• 513U mcF,LEM COUNTY
71,015.04
.01
17.753.75
5).261!5
75
{
5132 REHVILLE COUNTY
41,719.00
.00
10.929.75
32,104.15
25
1 f
9135 Sw IFT COUNTY
35.9..2.00
.00
4.9n5.5U
2..9S6.50
25
�. 1
• 5137 YELLOW MEOTCINF COUNTY
15,204.00
6,301.UO
5,301.00
3d.903.GO
25
5140 APPLETON
9.677,00
.GO
T,419.2i
1.2S7.7S
25
s {
5145 BENSON
19.357.00
.uO
4.UJd.75
14.514.75
25
51443 FAIAFAK
9, 2u0.0U
.00
.102.00
0,906.UD
75
S15J 04CUF
27,407.00
.00
5,970.5)
24,611.50
75
_. _5155 GA%CEVILLE
4,030.00
.um
1.007.%0
>.U22.5n
25
5157 GRANITE FALLS
!7.043.00
.u0
5,510.75
16.531.1S
25
5140 HUTCH1NSn•1
60,OU4.00
.u0
15.Oul.00
45.003.00
25
�A
5165 KEAKHJYEN
4,140.90
.00
1.937.91)
3,II1.UO
25
SI7J LITC4FltL0
43.515.Ou
.uO
13,001.50
32.644.50
25
i � V
5172 nLfVIA
20,719.Ou
.00
S,17n.75
15.539.25
25
5175 9ATJNVILLE
13.3U0.90
.1)9
3.451.96
Y,640.04
?6
5180 WILLMAR
95,732.00
.1)0
13,931.00
71.79#,00
25
.�
• SINS 91%J ISLAND
9.21)9.00
.00
2.307.00
6,906.00
25
__ -5190 _ DAMSON _ _.
11.148.00
.JO
3.207.00
9.061.00
25
.�
%L95 HECTOA
0.057.00
.00
2,044,25
0.042.75
75
$200 MADISON
14,940,90
.uO
3,735.00
11,295.00
25
.527). REHVILLE.
10.359.00
.00
7 .509.75
7,769.25
TS
8410 CASH RECEIPTS C SALES TAR
50.000.00
4.461.54
R,OJ4.91
41.995.10
16
Q
! S4ZO GIFTS
1,000.00
.00
.00
3.000.00
0
5430. INTEREST ... _..
7,500.00
90!.32
1.729.65
5.770.35
23
• TOTAL RECEIPTS
1.353.016.00
[1.899.86
321.066.68
1,031,949.32
24
• 020 RtIMBUSEMENTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT)
S601 REIMBURSEMENTS - CHLPPF.A COUNTY
16.000.DU
.00
4.000.00
12.00).00
75
--- 34125 REIMBURSEMENTS -.OLIVIA (MATERIALS ONLY)
2.000.00
.00
.OJ
2,000.00
0
Sd1O REI4RURiEMENTS - SENSON ( MATFAIALS u4LY)
1.324.00
.00
1.550.00
22b.1)n-
Lit
%J40 REIMS - CHIPPEWA COUNTV (MAfEM( ALb ONLY)
25.n10.OJ
1U.00u.00
19,000.90
15,010.00
40
565J R11M11 - MOVIEYIOEO (MATERIALS ONLY)
11
.u0
.00
11.704.00
U
• TOTAL REIMBUSEMENTS (LOCAL GOVERNMENT)
56.118.00
10.000.00
15.550.00
44.568.00
28
• J30 314EP REfMRURSFMFNTS
Sd70 IT44R RtIMOURSEMFNTS
2,SJO.0U
1.UR1.46
I.ZU2.32
1.297,00.
4d
L._ TOTAL OTHER REIMBURSEMENTS
2.500.00
1.081.46
1.202.32
1,291.68
48
• CiEL_FYNaS_
-_�__
' 5910 GLENCOE FUND
4 ,, z ,r11
1.190.00
.00
.00
L.3
0
A •' .5920 KCWL
2,942.00
3)0.00
400.00
2,462.00
16
21__ LOCAL-EBULPME31Lf. MISCELLANEOUS_
2.000.0.
.00
.00
2.000.00
0
5 950 SALES TAR
'
2.000.00
.00
.00
l.00 J. JO
J
• TOTAL OTHER FUNDS
6.332.00
330.00
480.00
7.852.00
6
• 90'. TOTAL LISRARV
1,419.966.00
23.311.12
))9,299.00
1.091. 66 T. 00
24
•
0 0 0 FINAL TOTALS 42 ACCOUNTS
•
1,419.966.00
23.3IL.32
119,299.00
1.081,667.00
24
TOTAL RRCRIPTS AND BALANCE
$329,348.97
$474.730.17
I
' 823]1 aAtAE
2312,41
B+OL 4{ D1 FUND
• r +v AAr
• 100 PERSONAL SERVICES
BIDS SALARIES AND GAGES
-11.1 MLII IN
5170 HEALTH 3VJURAN:[ - DFOUCT
SL30 Rc T/RE•EVI 14SUI,A4:E
Y tN'IiTMLA`J lIe•ART iTSTtV
PEgWABN loll
4JSAS - AOULT
IN T EXPEND] EEGUIDELINE IDL ETN-
_
IFS1.5 PAGE 1
EXPENDITURE _-
�8 GY f / E]
..,.. •10 y(µ. ;6A µlm
PtRCENT OF YEAR
174. .
I WLLE NI -- ACTUAL-
_ ACTUAL..
_. 80GT_ -_ ACT
5225
BUDGET THIS -HONTM
TE4R -10 -DATE
_
DIFFERENCE FCT
_
406,159.00
n Tura ,
1]0.70
?U.59
73,466.02
147,015.2.
737,163.76 17
._2,000.0.1
I0,40J
- -- _ _ 21.000.90. 1,601.93
--
1.792.34
17.607.66._
CHIPPE44 COUVTV LI44AMY M4TE11Alt
4,000." onO.24
1. 166.6u
__16
2.11 ). 4D 39
1441
6245
45,870 11..05.09
IR.417.97
72,.52.03 23
-- - 1,000.029.00 ob.474.18
170.012.15
430.016.85
.
6470 MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
1S,OJ0.0J
36.655.00
100.00
.00
1,444,dO
1.544.80
• 150 DtHtI
45'04 ',IS f1 11• < _ ,�
le cu
510 SUP AND PRINTING
5 ,
SlS PR OMOrNOf(ONAL AND PROJlANNINF
S'23 'ILEA]' 413 MEFTIN:S - TRUST!,
SS1U 'RIF. NEMOFRStl1YS ITAUSTCESI
a<1• l.c Re --
6540 A05 AND LOCAL NOTICES
654i 400111 N4
• _
655' C.VTIN'JI46 tDJC &T1n4 - --
63S0 SC411ARS4IP FUND
T' t
• TONAL OTHER
• 1TO SPCCIAL
SSW 3 L1 CJF FRIENOS, 1
X1
b.SJ LOCAL E;U1PAENT
SOSO STATE SALES TAX
• Tnra
BALANCE LEFT ON NAN
$192,291.17
7 .
1.5]7. -3 _ _ 5
5135
4JSAS - AOULT
111. 0Un.0u -
- - 14,115.0•
91.00
6110
425AS - CHILDREN
5220
PERIODICALS -"- -- _
- 15.200.OJ_
5225
PAMPHLETS
.6,750.OJ
.50.30
_
1 1b-
n Tura ,
1]0.70
?U.59
5230
BENSON LIBRARY MATFATALS
._2,000.0.1
I0,40J
3.50
5215
CHIPPE44 COUVTV LI44AMY M4TE11Alt
1S,O1n.9J
262.54
1. 354. 2n
1441
6245
IOM" FILMS
11,11 4.00
1,. T? I
194 1
625]
VSDED tAPLS
4,OJ n, 00
.
_
a]5S
aun10 ....
5.000.0]
14'.30
625J
SLIDES A40 FILr STRIPS
" --- - 400
250.00
d.UO
I".
.
•I:aFO44S
R1Vn1 c
340.7]
..D
35.00
•
TOTAL
MATERIALS '
_ 1.7u0.0J
zao, ue.oD
.20
26,226.24
•
124 CATALJi14J - -..-
_. __.__- ____
5310
OLLL ANJ OTHER CMARJ15
16, 6J9.n6
9•.54.16
•
40741
U TALOGING
24,00 D. 7J
40,604.00
10,710.72
•
130 VaMfC LIS
SJSJ
OPEAATTJN AND M411Ti NANO'
1.. tJ 0.00
3.274.12
63TO
4404TIZATJON
.00
•
TOTAL
VEHICLES
8.nu0.DU
.00
- -- _
-- 26.035.00
1.209.22
•
140 CJIMUNICATIJV
1.,.
5420
TF c F ANn INF IMAR0 Es- __
TERMINAL MAINTENANCE
_ 9,005.]4
1.521.14
$410
POSTAJE AND SNIPIINS
1,OU0.0J
71S.04
.50
A_
Loral
CONNU MLIArInm
1,U 12. 54
6470 MAINTENANCE AND CONTRACTS
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
1S,OJ0.0J
36.655.00
100.00
.00
1,444,dO
1.544.80
• 150 DtHtI
45'04 ',IS f1 11• < _ ,�
le cu
510 SUP AND PRINTING
5 ,
SlS PR OMOrNOf(ONAL AND PROJlANNINF
S'23 'ILEA]' 413 MEFTIN:S - TRUST!,
SS1U 'RIF. NEMOFRStl1YS ITAUSTCESI
a<1• l.c Re --
6540 A05 AND LOCAL NOTICES
654i 400111 N4
• _
655' C.VTIN'JI46 tDJC &T1n4 - --
63S0 SC411ARS4IP FUND
T' t
• TONAL OTHER
• 1TO SPCCIAL
SSW 3 L1 CJF FRIENOS, 1
X1
b.SJ LOCAL E;U1PAENT
SOSO STATE SALES TAX
• Tnra
BALANCE LEFT ON NAN
$192,291.17
7 .
1.5]7. -3 _ _ 5
570.71
21,494.00 2
2,49',72
I.cuo.OJ 9
91.00
-_. 6.DJp. ➢4 -- d
d49.23
1
1.540.00 23,4SI.04 27
S. 429. 40 - 4.171.54 93
21,006. I6 0.653.62 75
SS. 59 244,41 19
1.750.50 it?.50a&
SO?. 94 1.014.12 23
1, it 1. 47 23.296.53 7
1.605.54 IU.117.45 14
7.900.00 . 65
1.749,42 3.706.'6 20
451.13 51.13- __113_ -
.n0 25J.JD U
)$.DO 269.00 12
.00 1.000.00 5 -
61.631.66 176.486.34 27
•.572.20 7,015.14 SB --
1,829.7Y 22.17J.21 0 _
11.402.05 29,20S.95 28
`,549.01 12.0SJ.99
1.911.)0 1.401.04 S6
.00 6,000.00 J
4.466.37 21.546.63 17
z.12C.90 ..679.04 24
. 1,502.00 J •
2,112.01 91 IU.541.J9 11
4.293.81 Id.421.13 19
275.50 2.361..4 10 -- -
.OU 1.J0J.00 ___
1,449.12 11.55J.65 23 -
3.722.68 14.932.32 20 -
1,0'0.62
5, 110. i9
v 4.00
852.17
I, IO2.4S
2)1.75
1,012.00
2)2.32
DO
150.
00
09. D
]1. D O
21,8001.35 35
27.63
2, 2.3.2U
415.DJ
471.04
3.116.67
282.447, 00
282.447.00
6192,291.17
.19.38 _._.TJ____
22,193.71 19
902.u0 10
5.147.83 -1
1.d17.35 11
A5S..0 54
512.00 -_ LIS._ �
132.d2- 233
1,'n0.00 0 -
2.554.00_. IN
550..0 J
911.30 7
5. 110. UD
4{.692.65 34
1.362.37 2
T38.d5 75
1.586.00 21
1.526.96 24
5.215.13
1,137.519.00 20
1.137.519.00 - -.Za _
1,0'0.62
5, 110. i9
v 4.00
852.17
I, IO2.4S
2)1.75
1,012.00
2)2.32
DO
150.
00
09. D
]1. D O
21,8001.35 35
27.63
2, 2.3.2U
415.DJ
471.04
3.116.67
282.447, 00
282.447.00
6192,291.17
.19.38 _._.TJ____
22,193.71 19
902.u0 10
5.147.83 -1
1.d17.35 11
A5S..0 54
512.00 -_ LIS._ �
132.d2- 233
1,'n0.00 0 -
2.554.00_. IN
550..0 J
911.30 7
5. 110. UD
4{.692.65 34
1.362.37 2
T38.d5 75
1.586.00 21
1.526.96 24
5.215.13
1,137.519.00 20
1.137.519.00 - -.Za _
