Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp01-28-1992 cJ
C6 - v
VIEF!: O
January 26 February 1 �
..
-29-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
at City Hall
SUNtDAY
-26-
THURSDAY
-30-
5:00 P.M. - Park & Recreatio 5:30 P.M. - Tree Board Meeting
Board Meeting at at Recreation Cente
Library Conferen e
Room I X
r40►NDAY
-27-
Noon - Safety Council Meeting
at Heritage Center
1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commiss
Meeting at Utilities
• w r- r -� ay t
-28-
7:30 P.M. - Airport Commission 7:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at City Hall Meeting at City
(Upstairs) Hall
FRIDAY SAT U. DAY
-31- 1 -1-
OUT OF T014N
a RANDY DEVRIES & DOUG MEIER -
Tour of Chicago Factory -
January 28 -29
y
1 r
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1992
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2. Invocation - Rev. Jim Hall, Word of Life Church
3. Consideration of Minutes
Regular Meeting of January 14, 1992
Action - Approve as distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - December 1992
2. Planning Commission Minutes - December 17, 1991
(b) Appointments to Senior Advisory Board
1. Ceila Ziemer 2. Loretta Pishney
3. Mildred Jensen
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and ratify
appointments
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
(a) Letting No. 1, Project No. 92 -01, 92 -03 & 92 -04
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject -
Motion to approve and order plans and specifications -
Motion to waive reading and adopt Resolution
6. Communications, Requests And Petitions
None
7. Resolutions And Ordinances
(a) Resolution No. 9653 - Resolution Transferring $23,000
From The General Fund To The Youth Center Special
Revenue Fund
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 28, 1992
(b) Resolution No. 9654 - Resolution Substituting Pledged
Securitites for Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of
Hutchinson, MN
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of McLeod County Offer to Purchase
Property from City of Hutchinson (Parcel 3, Plat 26,
CSAH 8) (DEFERRED JANUARY 14, 1992)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) Discussion of Petro Fund And Agreement with Omar Collis
(DEFERRED JANUARY 2, 1992)
Action -
9. New Business
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water And Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment
period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Discussion of Sale of Stock of Star Midwest, Inc.
Action -
(c) Consideration of Pay Equity Report
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
implement
(d) Consideration of Policy Updates for Police Department
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(e) Consideration of Rescheduling February 11, 1992 City
Council Meeting
Action -
(f) Consideration of Setting Public Hearing Date for
Establishing Tax Increment Financing District
Action -
2
0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 28, 1992
(g) Discussion of Fair Ground Property Annexation
Action -
(h) Consideration of AWAIR Safety Manual
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(i) Consideration of Lease Condemnation for Laundromat
Located In Former Elks Club Building
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(j) Consideration of Authorizing City Attorney to Provide
Notice for Wigen Building Acquisition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(k) Consideration of Authorizing City Attorney to Provide
Notice for Railroad Property Acquisition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
0 (1) Consideration of Advertising for Bids for Purchase of
Equipment
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(m) Consideration of Dispatch Supervisor Position In Police
Department
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(n) Consideration of Amending Transient Merchant Ordinance
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and waive
first reading of ordinance and set second reading for
first meeting in February
(o) Consideration of Adoption of Proposed Zoning Ordinance
#464 with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive first reading of ordinance and set second
reading for first February meeting
•
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - JANUARY 28, 1992
(p) Consideration of Amendment to Subdivision Ordinance
Regarding Public Sites And Open Spaces with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive first reading of ordinance and set second
reading for first February meeting
(q) Consideration of Annual Review of Conditional Use
Permit Requested By Jeff Munsell for Dance Studio with
Favorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
10. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds -
12. Adjournment
4
•
MINUTES
REGULAR.,MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Ackland.
The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland, Council
Members John Mlinar, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson.
Absent: Council Member Craig Lenz. Also present: City Admin-
istrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg and City
Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
2. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by the Reverend Jim Hall.
INSTALLATION OF NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBER AND POLICE COMMISSION
MEMBER
City Attorney Anderson administered the Oath of Office to
newly elected Council Member Donald E. Erickson and Police
Commission Member Kathleen Skarvan.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the public hearings of the regular meeting of
November 26, 1991, regular meeting of December 10, 1991,
special meeting" of December 17, 1991, special meeting of
December 30, 1991 and January 2, 1992 were approved as dis-
tributed.
4. ROUTINE ITEMS
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT - AMENDED OCTOBER 1991
AND DECEMBER 1991
2. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21,.1991
3. PARK & RECREATION BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 30, 1991
4. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19, 1991
(b) POPCORN STAND PERMIT APPLICATION BY MARK MCGRAW
(c) FINANCIAL STATEMENT - NOVEMBER 1991
(d) APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING LICENSE FOR ELKS
• The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously carried, to
N
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
order reports and minutes filed and to issue gambling
license.
Following discussion regarding the popcorn stand located
in Library Square, the motion was made by Council Member
Erickson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and unani-
mously carried, to deny the popcorn stand permit to Mark
McGraw for the popcorn stand.
5. PUBLIC HEARING
None.
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) REQUEST BY STREET SUPERVISOR TO ATTEND OUT -OF -STATE
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE SEMINAR FEBRUARY 7-9, 1992
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried, to
approve the request.
(b) REQUEST FOR OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL TO REVIEW SEWER JETTER
AND VAC MACHINE AT CHICAGO FACTORY
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried, to
approve the request.
(c) DISCUSSION OF JOINT METER READING BETWEEN CITY AND
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
Utilities Manager Clarence Kadrmas and Director Randy
DeVries presented the proposed water meter change out
program.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council
Member Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to approve and implement the pro-
gram.
(d) DISCUSSION OF FIVE WEEK VACATION BENEFIT AFTER TWENTY
YEARS OF CITY EMPLOYMENT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to refer to the Employee Benefits
Committee and to defer to the February 11, 1992 Council
meeting.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
(e) REQUEST TO USE LIBRARY SWQUARE ON JANUARY 22, 1992 FOR
PRO -LIFE RALLY
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Erickson, seconded by Council Member Torgerson and
unanimously carried, to approve request.
(f) CORRESPONDENCE FROM DONALD GILBERTSON REGARDING CITY
SEWER LINE
During discussion Engineer Rodeberg stated the City had
made every effort to remedy the Gilbertson sewer line
problem. Mr. Gilbertson submitted a claim for $1100 -1200
for repair work done which was deducted from his assess-
ment.
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried, to
reimburse Gilbertson for one -half the installation cost
for additional plumbing.
(g) DISCUSSION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 140 WASHINGTON AVE. N.
Realtor Larry Meyer offered to sell the City an eight
unit apartment building located at 140 Washington Avenue
N., with six units facing Jefferson Street.
Attorney Anderson stated there was no commitment by the
City, but the Dorsey law firm would be instructed to in-
clude this property in the tax increment district.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to refer to HRA.
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(a) RESOLUTION NO. 9644 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The motion was made by Council Member Mlinar, seconded by
Council Member Torgerson and unanimously carried, to
waive reading and adopt.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 9645 - RESOLUTION TO RENAME WEST RIVER
PARK TO MASONIC PARK
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Erickson, to waive reading and adopt.
Following discussion of changing the names of developed
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
parks, Councilmen Torgerson and Erickson withdrew their
motions. The Resolution was referred back to the Park &
Recreation Board for further review and action deferred.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 9646 - RESOLUTION TO RENAME COLLEGE HILL
PARK TO MAPLEWOOD PARK
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously carried, to
waive reading and adopt.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 9647 - RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 9603
The motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded
by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously carried, to
waive reading and adopt.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF REDISTRICTING CITY PRECINCTS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to approve the three precincts as
presented in three districts.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF 1992 BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE
(DEFERRED DECEMBER 17, 1991)
Building Official Jim Marka presented information regard-
ing the building permit fee schedule. Following discus-
sion, the motion was made by Council Member Erickson,
seconded by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously car-
ried, to approve the fee schedule and seven percent in-
terest in building inspections and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9652.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF MCLEOD COUNTY OFFER TO PURCHASE PROPERTY
FROM CITY OF HUTCHINSON (PARCEL 3, PLAT 26, CSAH 8)
Following a presentation by County Engineer Rick Kjonaas,
the motion was made by Council Member Mlinar to table to
the January 28, 1992 meeting. Motion seconded by Council
Member Torgerson and unanimously carried.
4
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED MN /DOT STATE AID AGREEMENT FOR
HUTCHINSON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Erickson, seconded by Council Member Torgerson and
unanimously carried,. to approve and enter into amended
agreement.
(c) DISCUSSION OF LIQUOR STORE PROPOSAL FROM GRINSTEAD &
ASSOCIATES
Administrator Gary Plotz reported on the liquor store
proposal submitted by Grinstead & Associates. Follow-
ing discussion, the motion was made by Council Member
Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and unani-
mously carried, to approve the Grinstead study and to
allow the City Administrator to delete unnecessary items.
(d) DISCUSSION OF WELLNESS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to refer to the Employee Benefits
Committee and to defer to the February 11, 1992 Council
meeting.
(e) DISCUSSION OF CROW RIVER DAM ENGINEERING EXPENSES
Engineer John Rodeberg commented on the overrun costs in-
curred by Barr Engineering on the Crow River dam work.
The Engineer recommended a $7,000.00 payment to Barr
Engineering.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to accept the recommendation of the
City Engineer for a $7,000.00 payment.
(f) DISCUSSION OF RELOCATION OF CSAH 12 (GOLF COURSE ROAD)
Following a report by Engineer Rodeberg, the motion was
made by Council Member Erickson to approve the concept.
Motion seconded by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously
carried.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON
IMPROVEMEMNT FOR LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 92 -01, 92 -03
& 92 -04
1�1
E
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Erickson and
unanimously carried, to approve and accept report, to set
hearing for January 28, 1992 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9648 & No. 9649.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON
IMPROVEMENT FOR LETTING NO. 3, PROJECT NO. 92 -05 & 92 -06
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to approve and accept report, to set
hearing for February 11, 1992 at 8:00 P.M., and to waive
readings and adopt Resolutions No. 9650 & No. 9651.
(i) DISCUSSION OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM LANDWEHR HEAVY MOVING
REGARDING CITY PIT
Engineer Rodeberg reported on Landwehr's request for
$2,500 to cover additional costs incurred by their com-
pany to search for granular borrow at the City pit.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Erickson and
unanimously carried, to reject. 0
(j) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF GAUGER STREET REQUESTED BY
TOM WIPRUD WITH UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION (DECEMBER 17, 1991 MEETING)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Erickson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and unan-
imously carried, to approve the unfavorable recommenda-
tion of the Planning Commission.
(k) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN REQUESTED BY DAN HUEBERT,
ACOMA TOWNSHIP, WITHIN TWO MILE RADIUS, WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
(DECEMBER 17, 1991 MEETING)
Following discussion, the motion was made by Council Mem-
ber Torgerson, seconded by Council Member Mlinar and
unanimously carried, to approve the recommendations of
City staff.
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
M
is
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
Administrator Plotz commented on a letter received from
Bill Block regarding the agreement with Hutch, Inc. The
City Attorney stated he would present a proposal to Mr.
Block on behalf of the City.
It was reported the City Attorney wished to attend a sem-
inar covering City issues and requested the City pay for
the registration. The motion was made by Council Member
Mlinar, seconded by Council Member Torgerson and unani-
mously carried, to approve the seminar at City expense.
Mr. Plotz stated the local
cess of being sold, with
suggested this matter be
visory Committee.
cable TV firm was in the pro -
a transfer of ownership. He
referred to the Cable TV Ad-
Administrator Plotz inquired if the Council wished to
hold joint meetings with various boards this year, as in
the past. The following meetings were tentatively set:
January 27, 1992 at the Victorian Inn:
5:30 P.M. -- Utilities Commission
7:30 P.M. -- Township Boards
•
February 10, 1992 at The Coach:
6:30 P.M. -- H.C.D.C. Board
7:30 P.M. -- Meeting with County Representatives
February 11, 1992: City Directors
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER JOHN MLINAR
Councilman Mlinar reported that Ralph Johnson had
attended a Park & Recreation Board meeting to express
appreciation for the donation to the baseball complex
which would benefit the community and provide for the
youth of the city.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER MARLIN.TORGERSON
Councilman Torgerson commented on an upcoming meeting and
suggested setting up criteria for sanitation specifica-
tions for a contract.
Mayor Ackland stated he planned to appoint a refuse and
recycling committee. This committee would prepare a
recommendation for the City Council.
•
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JANUARY 14, 1992
Attorney Anderson reported on environmental testing
results in the downtown development area. There were no
significant findings. He suggested further tests be per-
formed by Twin City Testing for $3,300.
The motion was made by Council Member Erickson, seconded
by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously carried, to ap-
prove testing by Twin City Testing.
The City Attorney stated the Council approved asbestos
findings at the last meeting. No additional testing was
required. There were no findings in the Wigen's build-
ing, but the More -4 floor tile showed asbestos findings.
It would cost $2 -4 a square foot to remove it.
It was reported that a meeting was held with Erickson's
and the Everest Group regarding the Phase II development
agreement. The cross easement issue may be resolved.
Soil borings and topographical work at the site were
requested. It may need a 429 assessment waiver and use
of default language in the agreement. Also, they re-
viewed the lease and issues regarding the liquor store.
The City Attorney recommended a proposal from Short
Elliott Hendrickson to do a study of the More -4 build-
ing to determine it could be remodeled.
Attorney Anderson stated he would verify whether a public
hearing was required for municipal redistricting. The
motion was made by Council Member Erickson to authorize
a public hearing at the earliest possible opportunity, if
required. Motion seconded by Council Member Torgerson
and unanimously carried.
11. CLAIMS. APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
'(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Council Member Torgerson, seconded
by Council Member Mlinar and unanimously carried, to ap-
prove the claims and authorize payment from appropriate
funds.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
10:40 P.M.
8 •
v
DECEMBER 1991 - PRELIMINARY
0 REVENUE REPORT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS
YOUTH CENTER - "DRY DOCK"
(1/28/92)'
DECEMBER 1991
MONTH OF YEAR TO BALANCE PERCENTAGE
DECEMBER DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
MEMBERSHIPS
0.00
220.00
1,000.00
780.00
22.0%
ADMISSIONS
0.00
2,099.50
3,500.00
1,400.50
60.0%
VIDEO GAMES
0.00
41.24
800.00
758.76
5.2%
POP
88.10
1,221.10
2,800.00
1,578.90
43.6%
CANDY
72.40
1,328.95
1,100.00
(228.95)
120.8%
CHIPS, ETC.
165.50
2,559.92
2,800.00
240.08
91.4%
INTEREST
18.37
179.05
500.00
320.95
35.8%
BLDG RENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
FUND RAISERS
0.00
0.00
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
10,500.00
53,550.00
53,656.00
106.00
99.8%
TOTAL
10,844.37
61,199.76
66,156.00
4,956.24
92.5%
EXPENSE REPORT
PERSONEL SERVICES
2,152.98
26,678.77
24,359.00
(2,319.77)
109.5%
OPERATING SUPPLIES
23.80
4,457.18
4,500.00
42.82
99.0%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
798.24
32,804.05
36,300.00
3,495.95
90.4%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
634.24
1,000.00
365.76
63.4%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
120.00
0.00
(120.00)
TOTAL
•
2,975.02
64,694.24
66,159.00
1,464.76
97.8%
YOUTHCTR
DECEMBER
14 DATES
•
399
ATTENDANCE
Y.T.D
4,779
,�- A (1- 1)
r
DECEMBER 1991 - PRELIMINARY CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT - 1991 DECEMBER 19
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
(1/28/92)
RE NUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND MONTH OF YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
DECEMBER DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED
LIQUOR SALES
60,470.93
468,383.43
435,000.00
(33,383.43)
107.70
WINE SALES
27,572.79
137,914.71
151,000.00
13,085.29
91.3%
BEER SALES
65,495.27
760,525.45
701,400.00
(59,125.45)
108.4%
BEER DEPOSITS
(50.81)
(685.55)
0.00
685.55
13.6%
MISC. SALES
5,405.45
52,055.25
40,895.00
(11,160.25)
0.0%
INTEREST
703.33
9,713.45
7,500.00
(2,213.45)
129.5%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
110,788.75
106,084.52
0.00
(106,084.52)
100.7%
CASH DISCOUNTS
(542.52)
(7,049.61)
(1,500.00)
5,549.61
0.0%
TOTAL
159,054.44
1,526,941.65
1,334,295.00
(192,646.65)
114.4%
EXPENSE REPORT
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
10,690.13
141,526.43
128,181.00
(13,345.43)
110.4%
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
657.82
3,405.88
3,700.00
294.12
92.1%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1,082.25
38,898.25
59,350.00
20,451.75
65.5%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
1,167.50
8,600.00
7,432.50
13.6%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
23,587.64
500.00
(23,087.64)
0.0%
TR SFERS
55,000.00
110,000.00
110,000.00
0.00
100.0%
C OF SALES
110,788.75
1,046,405.76
1,039,400.00
(7,005.76)
100.7%
OT
0.00
0.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
0.0%
TOTAL
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
WATER SALES
WATER METER SALES
REFUSE SERVICES
REFUSE SURCHARGE
SEWER SERVICES
PENALTY CHARGES
INTEREST EARNED
S C O R E
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
OTHER
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
R EO
WATER
SEWER
WASTE TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCT.
178,218.95 1 1,354,731.00 (10,260.46) 100.8%
520,108.00 0.00
51,216.79 541,095.97 531,800.00
450.00 8,702.00 8,000.00
61,870.95 619,693.20 666,000.00
5,252.99 52,869.30 0.00
149,610.85 1,578,164.81 1,504,000.00
2,712.11 19,596.25 15,000.00
0.00 107,824.12 160,000.00
0.00 46,154.09 0.00
107.00 15,275.91 3,000.00
1,648.23 7,534.67 2,000.00
0.00
272,868.92 3,517,018.32 2,889,800.00
(520,108.00)
(9,295.97)
(702.00)
46,306.80
(52,869.30)
(74,164.81)
(4,596.25)
52,175.88
(46,154.09)
(12,275.91)
(5,534.67)
0.0%
101.7%
108.8%
93.0%
(627,218.32)
58,075.96 751,390.47 687,850.00 (63,540.47)
9,000.58 564,966.10 827,636.00 262,669.90
38,367.47 1,256,563.41 1,787,035.00 530,471.59
0.00 0.00 0.00
104.9%
0.0%
67.4%
0.0%
376.7
121.7%
109.2%
68.3%
70.3%
TOTAL 105,444.01 2,572,919.98 3,302,521.00 729,601.02 77.9%
Mme;
1,954.70
44,771.86
39,591.00
(5
113.1%
DECEMBER 1991 - PRELIMINARY
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
165,354.00
DECEMBER 19
102.3%
ELECTIONS
(1/28/92)
4,678.43
4,612.00
(66.43)
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
MONTH OF
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
102.1%
DECEMBER
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
q XES
ASSESSING
0.00
21,500.00
21,500.00
0.00
100.0%
63,691.60
997,565.14
1,640,024.00
642,458.86
60.8%
LICENSES
1,827.00
17,542.00
18,845.00
1,303.00
93.1%
PERMITS AND FEES
2,611.79
145,275.55
93,300.00
(51,975.55)
155.7%
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
876,248.02
1,933,134.20
1,364,648.00
(568,486.20)
141.7%
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
180,681.20
633,473.14
622,414.00
(11,059.14)
101.8%
FINES & FORFEITS
3,448.36
43,327.39
50,400.00
7,072.61
86.0%
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
37,499.68
296,800.18
151,620.00
(145,180.18)
195.8%
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
188,900.00
445,869.70
431,000.00
(14,869.70)
103.5%
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
(1,343.62)
363.00
250.00
(113.00)
145.2%
TOTAL
1,353,564.03
4,513,350.30
4,372,501.00
(140,849.30)
103.2%
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
1,954.70
44,771.86
39,591.00
(5
113.1%
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
11,958.43
169,143.40
165,354.00
(3,789.40)
102.3%
ELECTIONS
1,972.24
4,678.43
4,612.00
(66.43)
101.4%
FINANCE
19,930.69
246,722.87
241,739.00
(4,983.87)
102.1%
MOTOR VEHICLE
6,417.87
82,490.98
73,440.00
(9,050.98)
112.3%
ASSESSING
0.00
21,500.00
21,500.00
0.00
100.0%
LEGAL
283.50
41,458.58
42,000.00
541.42
98.7%
PLANNING
1,671.90
8,232.41
2,100.00
(6,132.41)
392.0%
Y HALL
3,528.86
43,176.13
43,362.00
185.87
99.6%
CREATION BUILDING
3,538.26
56,761.42
60,137.00
3,375.58
94:4%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
72,766.24
1,030,082.05
939,737.00
(90,345.05)
109.6%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
3,161.81
126,281.16
123,245.00
(3,036.16)
102.5%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
2,298.05
32,837.88
30,863.00
(1,974.88)
106.4%
BUILDING INSPECTION
6,465.99
86,121.86
71,626.00
(14,495.86)
120.2%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
0.00
5,475.63
10,250.00
4,774.37
53.4%
SAFETY COUNCIL
250.00
250.00
250.00
0.00
100.0%
FIRE MARSHALL
3,572.07
48,283.78
49,848.00
1,564.22
96.9%
ENGINEERING
17,736.17
253,151.42
267,031.00
13,879.58
94.8%
STREETS & ALLEYS
44,194.43
404,888.34
412,517.00
7,628.66
98.2%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
4,938.09
69,890.64
77,200.00
7,309.36
90.5%
LIBRARY
1,013.06
71,086.72
72,804.00
1,717.28
97.6%
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
6,247.20
86,685.32
91,005.00
4,319.68
95.3%
PARK /REC. ADMIN.
7,759.06
106,523.39
103,124.00
(3,399.39)
103.3%
RECREATION
6,002.25
147,549.53
153,146.00
5,596.47
96.3%
CIVIC ARENA
15,543.88
133,281.94
128,445.00
(4,836.94)
103.8%
PARK DEPARTMENT
30,881.41
436,217.34
402,751.00
(33,466.34)
108.3%
CEMETERY
4,671.38
56,856.50
54,737.00
(2,119.50)
103.9%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(2.51)
36,871.86
32,236.00
(4,635.86)
114.4%
DEBT SERVICE
20,034.88
53,990.23
54,187.00
196.77
99.6%
AIRPORT
16,567.58
210,151.18
200,297.00
(9,854.18)
104.9%
TRANSIT
6,902.19
105,909.08
108,884.00
2,974.92
97.3%
ENERGY COUNCIL
0.00
3.07
7,600.00
7,596.93
0.0%
S C.D.P. COORDINATRO
10,110.51
297,049.77
39,526.00
(257,523.77)
0.0%
di LLOCATED
(32,566.66)
262,257.26
342,415.00
80,157.74
76.6%
0.00
TOTAL
299,803.53
4,780,632.03
4,467,559.00
(313,073.03)
107.0%
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, December 17, 1991
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7:30
p.m. with the following members present: E1Roy Dobratz, Dean Wood,
Clint Gruett, Roland Ebent and Chairman Bill Craig. Absent: Tom
Lyke and Craig Lenz Also Present: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
and John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Ebent made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Tuesday, November 19, 1991. Seconded by Mr. Dobratz
the motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY JUNE REDMAN FOR CLUSTER HOUSING
• There was discussion on the dead line for continuing the
conditional use permit. Mr. Ebent moved to approve to
continue the request to the April, 1992, Planning
Commission meeting, seconded by Mr. Dobratz the motion
carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR COMMERCIAL AND MINI -
STORAGE
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7 :35 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4328 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, December 5, 1991. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional
use permit to allow for the construction of commercial
and mini- storage located at Hwy 15 North.
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained staff concerns
being of drainage, borings, sewer and water to the
property, also, the new proposed ordinance does not
permit mini - storage in C -4 zone.
Mr. Condon, applicant, commented on his proposal and the
direction he should take with the property. He states he
is willing to address the concerns in a positive way.
Ms. Campa, owner of the Karate business to be housed in
this development, explained the business expansion over
the years.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 17, 1991
There was discussion of the sewer and water issues to be
addressed.
Discussion followed on the possibility of
"grandfathering -in" the request after the proposed
ordinance is approved. City Engineer Rodeberg commented
on the natural drainage on wetland sites.
Mr. Gruett moved to continue the hearing to January 21,
1992, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion carried
unanimously.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF GAUGER STREET REQUESTED BY
TOM WIPRUD
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7 :45 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4329 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, December 5, 1991 and
Thursday, December 10, 1991. The request is for the
purpose of considering a petition to vacate a portion of
Gauger Street.
City Administrator Plotz explained staff interpretation
of the second building to be constructed on the property •
and the fact the proposed ordinance does not allow a
second accessory building on a property. He also noted
concerns from neighboring property owners.
City Engineer Rodeberg commented on fire access.
Mr. Tom Wiprud explained the present driveway turnaround.
There was discussion of the apartment house property.
There was also discussion of the right -of -way of the
street and no fire access.
Mr. Ken Gruenhagen, owner of Hutch Motel, stated his
opposition to the proposal for safety reasons. Discussion
followed on maintenance of the street and the possibility
of a variance. There was some discussion on attaching
two accessory buildings with a fire wall.
Mr. Ebent moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Wood the hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. Mr. Ebent moved to
recommend denial of the request to City Council and
directed city staff and city attorney to research, before
the first of the year, the possibility of a zero lot line
addition to the garage. If a variance is appropriate the
fee is to be waived. Seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion
2 0
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 17, 1991
carried unanimously.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN REQUESTED BY DAN HUEBERT,
ACOMA TOWNSHIP, 2 MILE RADIUS
City Administrator Plotz commented on the relocation of
County Rd 12 and staff discussion regarding the developer
contacting the county engineer for more detail of
placement of the road. The Shoreland Ordinance may also
affect the property. He stated the city is in favor of
the development and willing to work with the developer.
There was discussion regarding the potential of sewer and
water to the area.
Mr. Gruett moved to forward the recommendations of city
staff on to the county, seconded by Mr. Wood the motion
carried unanimously.
(b) DISCUSSION OF SHORELAND ORDINANCE
Mr. Plotz stated the Building Official, Jim Marka, is
• requesting a 3 month extension for funding purposes.
City Engineer John Rodeberg stated the DNR is working to
get the ordinance completed by February 15th and
explained some portions of the ordinance.
5. OLD BUSINESS
(a) COMMUNICATION FROM BARRY ANDERSON REGARDING ANNUAL REVIEW
OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL FOR
DANCE STUDIO
Mr. Plotz commented on the history of the annual review
and the hardsurfacing of the parking lot.
There was discussion of the Florida Street access.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to place
the item on the January agenda.
(b) UPDATE OF ZONING ORDINANCE DRAFT RECEIVED 9 -20 -91
Mr. Plotz stated the zoning ordinance will be ready for
public hearing on January 21, 1992.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DECEMBER 17, 1991
(c) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Mr. Plotz commented on correspondence from the county
regarding a proposed development by Mr. Skip Quade.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
9:10 P.M.
•
4 0
PUBLICATION NO. 4337
NOTICE OF ]TEARING
Lh']'TIIiG NO. 1
PROTECT NO. 92 -01, 92 -03 & 92 -04
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will
meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 8:00 P.H. on the 28th day of
January, 1992, to consider the making of an improvement of;
Project No. 92 -01 Roberts Road from Dale Street to School Road by
construction of Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel
Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and
Appurtenances,
Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel
Street by construction of Sanitary Sewer and Services,
Watermain and Services, Street Improvements and
Appurtenances; and
Project No. 92-04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts
Road by construction of Sanitary Sewer and Services,
Watermain and Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel
Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous
Surfacing and Appurtenances;
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed
to be assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which
property owners shall receive mailed notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $81,600.00, the estimated
State Aid Cost is $190,000.00, with an estimated $201,800.00 Assessable Cost, for
the total estimated cost of $473,400.00.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed
improvement will be heard at this meeting.
Dated: January 14th, 1992
City Adminis ator
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE FOR
OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER IIiF+ORliED OF A
TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
r 1
�J
PUBLISHED IN THE H[TTCHINSON DEADER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 16TH, 1992.
.�- 7q.
1992 PuBLSC HEARSNGS / Ci Y o f Hu t ch i n son
Le Ling No _ 2
Protect No_ 92 -01 Roberts Road
Project No_ 92 -0.3 Priebe Addi ti on
Protect No _ 92 -04 Be tlrer ' 2nd Addi ti on
ITEM
STREET CONSTRUCTION
STREET CONSTRUCTION
Priebe & Betker's 2n
service on a per lot
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT RATES
Roberts Road only
RANGE AVERAGE
(RESIDENTIAL) S25 -30 /FF $ 28
(COMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) $28-35 / F F $ 33
d Additions to pay all costs for utility and street
basis as described in their Subdivision Agreements
NOTES
► Watermain and storm sewer replacement will be at City cost
► Sideyard improvements and previous assessments will be credited
► Project will go out for Bids if approved at Public Hearing
► Assessment Hearing will be held after Bid Opening
► Actual assessments to be calculated for Assessment Hearing
► Project will be awarded if approved at Assessment Hearing
► PAYMENT OPTIONS:
Full payment without interest by October 1, 1992
• Full payment with interest (from October 1st) by November 15, 1992
After November 15, 1992 the assessments are certified to tax rolls
Assessment on Tax Roll, 10 years with interest, Equal Principal
Deferment available for property owners, meeting income
guidelines, who are either over 65 years old or disabled.
n
C,�o asap
■@MEMO*
C�,c T.�QC •
l
Fil
ti
i.. O
0
I
2
0 RESOLUTION NO. 9656
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING 140. 1
PROJECT NO. 92 -01, 92 -03 & 92 -04
6•tHEP.EAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 14th day of January,
1992, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of:
Project No. 92 -01 Roberts Road from Dale Street to School Road by
construction of Watermain, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel
Base, Bituminous Base, Bituminous Surfacing and
Appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel
Street by construction of Sanitary Sewer and Services,
Watermain and Services, Street Improvemet.ts and
Appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts
Road by construction of Sanitary Sewer and Services,
Watermain and Services, Storm Sewer, Grading, Gravel
Base, Curb and Gutter, Bituminous Base, Bituminous
• Surfacing and Appurtenances.
AND WHEREAS, ten days' published notice of the hearing through one weekly
publication of the required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon on
the 28th day of January, 1992, at which all persons desiring to be heard were
given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution
adopted the 14th day of January, 1992.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this
improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such
improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of January, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
S--A .
RESOLUTION NO. 9653
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING $23,000 FROM THE GENERAL FUND
TO THE YOUTH CENTER SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
THAT a transfer of $23,000 is hereby authorized to be
transferred form the General Fund to the Youth Center Special
Revenue Fund.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of January 1992.
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
ATTEST:
•
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 9654
AUTHORIZING SUBSTITUTION OF PLEDGED SECURITIES
FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO., HUTCHINSON, MN
WHEREAS, Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
a city depository, has requested release and substitution of the
following security under the collateral agreement with the City of
Hutchinson:
Release of:
DESCRIPTION DUE AMOUNT
Arlington, MN Imp. Series 1985 01 -01 -95 $ 50,000.00
Cambridge, MN GO Imp. 03 -01 -95 50,000.00
Hutchinson, MN 03 -01 -96 80,000.00
Owatonna, MN ISD #761 02 -01 -97 100,000.00
New Hope, MN GO Tax Increment 02 -01 -96 100,000.00
Substitution of:
DESCRIPTION DUE AMOUNT
FNMA 07 -11 -94 $500,000.00
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Administrator be authorized to release the
requested securities and to accept the substituted securities.
Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of January, 1992.
•
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Paul L. Ackland
Mayor
7-9,
COUNTY OF McLEOD
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
L`
December 17, 1991
OFFER TO PURCHASE
STATEMENT OF COMPENSATION
•
TO: City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: CSAH 8, Project 90:40
The McLeod County Highway Department hereby offers all interested parties who
may have an interest in the real estate to be acquired the sum of $10,110.55
which has been estimated to be just compensation for such property and rights
based upon the fair market value of the property. A summary of the amount
set out above as just compensation is as follows:
(a) Identification of the real property to be acquired
Parcel 3, Plat 26, CSAH 8
(b) Types of interest being acquired.
1) Permanent Construction Easement X
2) Temporary Construction Easement X
(c) Summary of fair market value and offer:
1) Land & Improvements $ 10,110.55
2) Damages $
3) Total $ 10,110.55
This offer is based on a review and analysis of an appraisal(s) of this
property by a qualified appraiser(s).
You will have a reasonable length of time to consider the offer. To aid in
your decision you may wish to secure your own appraisal. Minnesota law
provides for reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $500.00 for the actual
cost of an appraisal of property acquired by direct purchase.
Reimbursement cannot be made, however, until your property is acquired.
If you decide to accept the offer, the parcel will be acquired by direct
purchase and you will be paid upon satisfactory evidence of merchantable
title. - - If the offer is unacceptable you may have your property acquired in
an eminent domain proceedings.
P.O. BOX 236 GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336 (612) 864 -3156 FAX (612) 864 -3410
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION -� '
1
I look forward to doing a very good job this next summer and promise to do my
best to accommodate any special concerns you may have. I want this proje itak
to provide maximum benefit to all concerned. If the above offer
satisfactory to you please have all the owners sign the easements in th'F
presence of a notary and return them to my office. If it is convenient for
you to come to Glencoe, we do have a notary here at our office most of the
time.
If you have any special concerns, please call my office and leave a message
briefly describing your question. I will get back to you with your answer or
if necessary arrange a time we can meet. Please do not come to my office
with your questions without an appointment. It is difficult for us to meet
with you without briefly researching your question prior to meeting. Thank
you.
Si Ward
Ri . Kjona , P.E.
McLeod County Engineer
st
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
McLeod County Road 8, Project 90:40 Parcel 3 Plat 26.
The City of Hutchinson, a municipal corporation
being the owner, in fee simple, of the real estate hereinafter
described, hereby grants unto McLeod County, its successors and
assigns, the hereinafter described permanent roadway easement for
the sum of Seven Six Hundred Fifty Dolla and N o Cents
($7,650.00) and other good and valuable considerations.
The said permanent roadway easement in McLeod County in the State
of Minnesota is described as follows:
TRACT DESCRIPTION
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116
North, Range 30 West.
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
Parcel 3 of McLeod County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 26.
Further, the owner agrees not to construct fences, plow or perform
any detrimental operation within the permanent roadway easement,
except the owner is hereby permitted to plant and harvest hay crops
within the limits of the permanent roadway easement until such time
as McLeod County directs otherwise.
Further, it is understood that McLeod County shall have the right
to use and remove all earth and other materials lying within 'the
limits of the permanent roadway easement.
Further, it is understood that McLeod County may permit cities,
townships, utility companies and others to place and maintain
power, telephone,'gas, tile, water, sewer and other utilities above
and /or under the ground within the limits of the permanent roadway
easement.
Further, the owner, his successors and assigns, hereby release the
County of McLeod, its officers and agents, from any and all
liability and claims concerning the hereinbefore described
permanent roadway easement and the owner's adjoining premises that
may result by virtue of the construction, maintenance, and use of a
public roadway over and upon the herein before described permanent
roadway easement.
is Dated this day of 11 19
r-A.,
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss
COUNT` O.l~ MCLEOD )
•fhe foregoing instrument was acknowledged before one this --
day of ]9 by
(Name of Officer or Agent.,
-- -- - -- — -- - -- — _ - - - -- - - and by
Title of officer or Agent
-- — - - -- — - — - - - -- — — - - -- - - —° f
(Name of Officer of Agent, Title of Officer or Agent.)
-- a --. -- — -- - - -- —
(Name of Corporation Acknowledging) (State or•
corporation, on behalf of
Place of incorporation)
corporation.
Notary Public
My Commission expires
This Instrument Was Drafted By:
Michael Junge
McLeod County, Glencoe, MN
n
0 TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT
McLeod County Road a, Project 90 :40 Parcel 3 Plat 26.
The City of Hutchinson. a municipal corporation
being the owner, in fee simple, of the real estate hereinafter
described, hereby grants unto McLeod County, its successors and
assigns, the hereinafter described temporary slope easement for the
sum of Two Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Dollars and Fifty -five Cents
($2.460.55) and other good and valuable considerations.
The said temporary slope easement in McLeod County in the State of
Minnesota is described as follows:
TRACT DESCRIPTION:
The East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 116
North, Range 30 West.
TEMPORARY SLOPE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
A 190.00 foot wide strip of land in the East Half of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 12, Township 116 North, Range 30 West. Said
strip of land lies northwesterly and northerly of and adjoins the
northwesterly and northerly line of Parcel 3 of McLeod County
Highway Right of Way Plat No. 26. The east and west lines of said
strip are the east and west lines of said East Half.
Also that part of said East Half of the Southwest Quarter described
as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Parcel
3; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly line of said Parcel
3 a distance of 527.94 feet; thence southeasterly, deflecting 90
degrees to the right, a distance of 165.00 feet to the point of
beginning of the land to be described; thence northwesterly, along
the last described course, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence
southwesterly, parallel with the southeasterly line of said Parcel
3, to the west line of said East Half; thence northerly, along said
west line, to said most southerly corner of Parcel 3; thence
northeasterly and easterly, along the southeasterly and southerly
line of said Parcel 3, to the east line of said East Half; thence
southerly, along said east line, to the intersection with a line
drawn parallel with said southeasterly and southerly line of Parcel
3 from the point of beginning; thence westerly and southwesterly,
along said parallel line, to the point of beginning.
Further, it is understood the temporary slope easement shall expire
on December 31, 1993.
•
Further, the owner agrees that all earth -and other material
necessarily excavated and removed from the slope easement area
shall become the property of McLeod County and shall be used in the
construction of said project or be hauled away and disposed as the
county may deem fit. McLeod County agrees to replace topsoil on
all areas within the slope easement where excavation and embankment
construction takes place and clay or other poor soil is exposed.
Further, the owner, his successors and assigns, hereby release
McLeod County, its officers and agents from any and all liability
and claims concerning the hereinbefore described temporary slope
easement and the owner's adjoining premises, that result or may
result by virtue of the construction of said slopes and all work in
connection therewith.
Dated this day of 1 19
,�_A -
CORPORATE ACKNONI,$DGEMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss
COUNTY OF MCLEOD)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this --
day of — _. 19 -_by -- - - - - --
(Name of Officer or Agent.,
- -- --- — - - - --
and tid b y
Title of Officer or Agent
-- - -- -- - -- -- - - - - - - -or
(Name of Officer of AKetit, Title of Officer or Agent)
- -- -- a -- -- — -- - - -- —
(Name.of Corporation Acknowledging) (State or
corporation, on be)�air or
Place of incorporation)
corporation.
Notary Public
My Commission expires
This Instrument Was Drafted By:
Michael Junge
McLeod County, Glencoe, MN
•
A RNOLD & MCDQ &ELL
DAVI B. ABSroLa ATTORNEYS AT
D. McDOwELL
aN A. AxD$asox 101 PARK PLACE
HARRY sxaa8sox•
STEVE HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA -2563
(612) 587 -7
N S. HOOE
LAURA H.FRETLAND 57
A. BRUEOOEMANN FAX (612) 587- 65
D. DOVE
JOSEP M. PAIEMHNT
JAMB RESIDENT AT RNEY
5 IITLEY O. BARRY AN ER
A. CHRISTIANS
RICH
AIR O. McOEE
TIMOT
W. FAFINSHI
December 5, 1991 NJ
Mr. Gary D. Plotz /
City Administrator /
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 11
Re: Omar Collis
MPC4 Site ID. No. Leak -2716
Our File No. 3244 -89031 (Collis subfile)
Dear Gary:
OF COUNSaL
CHARLES R. CAR ILICHAaL"
WI LLI M W. CAMERON
5881 CEDAR LANE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53416
( 612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343 -4545
FAX (6L2) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369-2214
FAX (612)389-5506
N >> ,
cl RECEIVED �
N
BY
Ca ZZ �Z�2
I thought I would update you on the status of our Petro Fund
application, as well as my recent conference with Omar Collis.
Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the State of Minnesota
dated November 4, 1991 regarding our application and announcing the
meeting which was held on November 19, 1991. I have not received
official notification of the results of the hearing, but I did
discuss the matter with Jan Matheson, and while she did not recall
the specifics, she did not recall that any problems were presented
by the Hutchinson application.
The total amount of our application was $73,724.80 and as you can
see, the recommendation is for the full amount of the application,
rather than the 90% figure previously discussed.
I do want to direct your attention to the agreement between Mr.
Collis and the City of Hutchinson. Under paragraph 2 of that
agreement, the City is obligated to pay Mr. Collis the sum of
$123,500 less the responsible party's share of environmental clean
up as required by the MPCA.
Under paragraph 3 of the agreement, 20% of the purchase price was
retained and escrowed because of potential clean up costs. I
believe the amount escrowed was $24,700. However, I believe
$10,000 was released to Mr. Collis because the tanks were
successfully removed leaving a remaining balance of $14,700 plus
. interest at the rate of 7% from and after the date of closing which
was, I believe, January 11, 1991.
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION ! l
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
DAVI
•
STEV
o.
DAVID
PAUL
JULIA
W. FAFINSHI
December 5, 1991 NJ
Mr. Gary D. Plotz /
City Administrator /
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 11
Re: Omar Collis
MPC4 Site ID. No. Leak -2716
Our File No. 3244 -89031 (Collis subfile)
Dear Gary:
OF COUNSaL
CHARLES R. CAR ILICHAaL"
WI LLI M W. CAMERON
5881 CEDAR LANE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53416
( 612) 545-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343 -4545
FAX (6L2) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 369-2214
FAX (612)389-5506
N >> ,
cl RECEIVED �
N
BY
Ca ZZ �Z�2
I thought I would update you on the status of our Petro Fund
application, as well as my recent conference with Omar Collis.
Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the State of Minnesota
dated November 4, 1991 regarding our application and announcing the
meeting which was held on November 19, 1991. I have not received
official notification of the results of the hearing, but I did
discuss the matter with Jan Matheson, and while she did not recall
the specifics, she did not recall that any problems were presented
by the Hutchinson application.
The total amount of our application was $73,724.80 and as you can
see, the recommendation is for the full amount of the application,
rather than the 90% figure previously discussed.
I do want to direct your attention to the agreement between Mr.
Collis and the City of Hutchinson. Under paragraph 2 of that
agreement, the City is obligated to pay Mr. Collis the sum of
$123,500 less the responsible party's share of environmental clean
up as required by the MPCA.
Under paragraph 3 of the agreement, 20% of the purchase price was
retained and escrowed because of potential clean up costs. I
believe the amount escrowed was $24,700. However, I believe
$10,000 was released to Mr. Collis because the tanks were
successfully removed leaving a remaining balance of $14,700 plus
. interest at the rate of 7% from and after the date of closing which
was, I believe, January 11, 1991.
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION ! l
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAH ASSOCIATION
Mr. Gary D. Plotz .
December 5, 1991
Page 2
At the time of our application, which was June of 1991, I show a
total amount billed to the City of Hutchinson by Twin City Testing
of $87,205.31, which would include all invoices through April 30,
1991. Assuming that the Petro Fund offers 100% reimbursement
rather than 90% reimbursement, the total amount to be paid
(probably within 90 days of November 19) will be $73,724.80. This
leaves a remaining balance of $13,480.51 which was paid by the
City.
However, as Twin City Testing pointed out in its analysis of its
bills, many of these charges related to environmental site work
generally and were not necessarily associated with the Petro Fund
problems specifically.
I mention all of these issues because we will need to decide how
we are going to treat Mr. Collis under the terms of the Option
Agreement. I would recommend that Ken work up an analysis showing
total bills receive payments made and the names o
for environmental work to date. I w ill need this information
anyway or su sequent Petro Fund applications, and I would suggest
7 that this matter be placed on the agenda for the last meeting in
December, because Mr. Collis will be expecting payment around the
first of the year and we should know at that time the final outcome
of discussions with the Petro Fund.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Thank you. Best regards.
Very t
G.1/Ba lry Afiderson
GBA:lm
Enclosure
•
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER
November 4, 1991
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
133 EAST 7th STREET
ST. PAUL, MN 55101
612/2%4026
FAX: 612/296 -4323
G. Barry Anderson
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue WEst
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Re: Leak 12801
Dear Mr. Anderson:
o�
The Petrofund Board will consider your reimbursementf request at its
next meeting which will take place on November 19 1991 at 8:30
a.m. The meeting will be held in Room 10, State Office Building,
100 Constitution Avenue, St. Paul, MN.
Reimbursement of $73,724.80 will be recommended to the Board. You
will be notified, in writing, within ten days of the Board's
decision.
We are enclosing for your review a copy of the MPCA Site Report.
The Board will base its decision on your application, your written
• correspondence and on the MPCA Site Report. Your attendance at the
Petrofund Board meeting is permitted but is not required; if you
wish to speak at the Board meeting, please contact the undersigned
prior to the meeting. Please note that the Board may limit the
time allowed for speaking.
If you have questions, please contact the undersigned.
Very r truly yours,
«��
aMatheson
at
Commerce Consumer Liaison
612/296 -2990
JKM:cjs
enclosure
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER - /� I
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 28, 1992
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Water Billing Department
SUBJECT: Delinquent water & sewer accounts for the month of Jan
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of Jan. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday,
Feb 3rd, 1992 at Noon.
2- 670 - 0400 -019
John Sandahl
400 Lynn Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
400 Lynn Rd
30.80
Promises 1/31/92
2- 675 - 0544 -031
Keith Krommenhoek
544 Madson Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
544 Madson Av
157.32
Promises 1/30/92
2- 700 - 1585 -001
Michelle Healy
1585 McDonald Dr
Hutchinson MN 55350
1585 McDonald Dr
110.70
n
LJ
Cihj Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue IVcst 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 557 -5151 (612) 5S7 -2975 (612) 557 -2242
Hutchinson, Af innesota 55,350 —A.
Printed on rceycled paper
2- 035 - 0540 -023
Jay Henninger
540 Second Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Second Av SW
160.68
cc: Joseph Paffel
Rt 1
Hutchinson MN
Promises 1/31/92
2- 350 - 0302 -072
Chris Doelger
2 Dale
Hut ' son MN 55350
Dale
153.75
2- 350 - 0325 -002
Thomas Smith
325 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
325 Dale St
148.92
Promises 1/30/92
2- 350 - 0505 -021
Richard Mattson
505 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
505 Dale St
159.00
2- 350 - 0850 -032
Rick Heidecker
850 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
850 Dale St
26.24
Promises 1/30/92
2- 470 - 0715 -031
E Duesterhoeft
715 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
715 Harrington St
172.65
2- 470 - 0867 -092
55350 Elvera Albrecht
867 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
867 Harrington St
33.96
Promises 2/3/92
2- 350 - 0890 -051
James Duhamel
890 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
890 Dale St
1��'2 13.► 2 _ Pro �.,�5� -,, ��1
2- 465- 0626 -081
Chris Johnson
626 Harmony Lane
Hutchinson MN 55350
626 Harmony Lane
118.89
2- 585 - 0621 -081
Bob Piehl
621 Juul Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
621 Juul Rd
28.66
Promises 1/31/92
2- 585 - 0643 -022
Michael Johnson
643 Juul Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
643 Juul Rd
117.84
2- 605 - 0360 -092
Debra Bondhus
360 Lake St
Hutchinson MN 55350
360 Lake St
126.03
Promises 2/4/92
2- 670 - 0230 -071
Hermann /Jilek
640 Adams St S
Hutchinson MN 55350
230 Lynn Rd
288.07
cc: Richard Larson
640 Adams St
Hutchinson MN 55350
C7
•
is
•
254 Winnebago Drive
P.O. Box 1167
Fond du Lac, WI 54936.1167
January 10, 1992
Mr. Paul Ackland - Mayor
Mr. Gary Plotz - Clerk
City of Hutchinson
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue W
Hutchinson MN 55350
'Telephone
(414) 923 -6335 T ��
JAN 1592 �N
cn RECEIVM
�� 0 � 6 `� 8 zLZ9�� 2q
Star Cablevision Grouc
BrOt • Clear • Excitmg
Dear Mr. Ackland and Mr. Plotz:
Star Cablevision has reached an agreement to sell the stock of Star Midwest,
Inc., owner of the cable television system serving the City of Hutchinson to D.D.
Cable Partners, L.P., subject, of course, to the approval of the Council.
D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. is a limited partnership whose general partner is
InterMedia Partners II and whose limited partner is General Electric Capital
Corporation. InterMedia Partners owns and operates cable television systems in
Hawaii, California, Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina. The
company is among the fastest growing cable companies in the United States. It
serves over 320,000 cable subscribers presently and has agreed to buy cable systems
serving an additional 175,000 subscribers. General Electric Capital Corporation is a
multi- billion dollar company with investments throughout the United States.
GECC will not only be an equity owner of the system, it will also act as the lender to
D.D. Cable Partners. This combination will obviously bring strong financial
resources to bear on the cable operation in the City of Hutchinson. As important,
D.D. Cable Partners (through the people of InterMedia Partners) will bring strong
managerial skills to bear on the operation as well.
The people of InterMedia, the general partner of D.D. Cable Partners, are all
experienced cable executives. Leo J. Hindery, Jr., the Managing General Partner of
InterMedia, was the Chief Financial Officer of The Chronicle Publishing Company
in San Francisco before forming InterMedia. While at the Chronicle, Mr. Hindery
oversaw the expansion of the company's cable television division. David G.
Rozzelle, a general partner of InterMedia serves as the Chief Executive Officer of
Cable Operations for the company. Mr. Rozzelle is a lawyer by training who
specialized in cable television matters. In his capacity as the chief operating officer
for InterMedia, Mr. Rozzelle has guided the operating team that has taken
InterMedia from a new company to the 30th largest cable company in the country in
less than two years. The third general partner is Edward G. Liebst, Jr. Mr. Liebst was
a Vice President at Bank of America where he specialized in cable lending. He
presently serves as the Chief Financial Officer for InterMedia.
1/1
The operating team is likewise comprised of professional cable
executives. Terry "Coop" Cotten, the Director of Operations for InterMedia,
started in the cable business as an installer at the age of 14. He has managed
small and large cable systems before joining InterMedia's headquarters staff.
Dick Maul, Director of Marketing, worked for HBO and for a large cable
multiple system operator before coming to InterMedia. Dave Large, Director
of Engineering, holds several patents for cable equipment and has won the
industry's highest award for engineering excellence. Attached is a brochure
which further describes the people of InterMedia who will run D.D. Cable
Partners.
InterMedia enjoys an excellent reputation in the cable industry and we
are proud to be associated with them in this transaction. Star Cablevision has
served your community well and we have every reason to believe that D.D.
Cable Partners will continue our tradition of service.
Enclosed is a copy of the press release describing the sale. We intend to
release this to the local newspaper in the next two days. If possible, could you
please make certain that the Council Members are made aware of this matter
before the newspaper receives the press release.
Also enclosed for your consideration is a draft of a resolution
approving the sale of the stock of Star Midwest, Inc. to D.D. Cable Partners,
L.P.
We formally request that you set the transfer for consideration
on the next available meeting date. The system manager will be in touch
shortly to follow up on this request.
Very truly yours,
STAR MIDWEST, INC.
C --- ..r
G Nadolsk
Y
Vice President/ Franchise Administration
1/2 is
RESOLUTION NO.
A Resolution of the City f Hutchinson Approving y h pp ng The
Change in Control of the Current Franchisee of the
Franchise to Operate a Cable Television System in the City
of Hutchinson From Star Cablevision Group to D.D. Cable
Partners, L.P., a California Limited Partnership.
Whereas, Star Midwest, Inc. (the "Franchisee ") is the current holder of a
franchise issued by the City of Hutchinson (the "Authority "), originally issued as
Ordinance No. 576 dated April 2, 1979 ( "Franchise "), to operate and maintain a cable
television system (the "System ") in the City of Hutchinson; and
Whereas, Star Cablevision Group ( "Owner ") is the current holder of all of the
stock of Franchisee; and
Whereas, the terms and conditions of the Franchise, as amended, are in full
force and effect as of the date of the execution of this Resolution; and
Whereas, Franchisee and D.D. Cable Partners, L.P., a California Limited
Partnership ( "D.D. Cable "), have entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as
of December 10, 1991 (the "Agreement "), providing for the sale of all the stock of
Franchisee to D.D. Cable; and
Whereas, Franchisee and D.D. Cable have submitted an application requesting
consent by the Authority to the sale of the stock of Franchisee to D.D. Cable, in
accordance with the requirements of the Franchise; and
Whereas, the Authority has determined that it is in the best interests of the
community and residents thereof to approve the sale the stock of Franchisee to D.D.
Cable:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hutchinson as follows:
Section 1. The Authority hereby consents to and approves the sale of the
stock of Franchisee to D.D. Cable and D.D. Cable's assumption of all rights and
obligations under the Franchise relating to the period from and after the date of the
consummation of the sale, to D.D. Cable, its successors and assigns.
Section 2. The assumption by D.D. Cable of all the rights and obligations
under the Franchise shall take effect on and after the date of consummation of the
sale of the stock of Franchisee to D.D. Cable.
• Section 3. The Authority hereby consents to and approves the grant by D.D.
Cable of a security interest in its stock and assets, including all of its rights, powers
% "R,
and privileges under the Franchise to such lender or lenders as may be designated by
D.D. Cable for financing purposes subject, however, ' to each of the terms and
conditions of the Franchise. 0
Section 4. The authority hereby affirms that, as of the date of this
Resolution, the Franchise is valid and remains in full force and effect and the
Authority is aware of no conduct by the Franchisee which would result in a default
under the Franchise.
Section 5. Upon written notice to the Authority, D.D. Cable may transfer the
stock of Franchisee or assign the assets of the System to InterMedia Partners II, L.P.,
a subsidiary thereof, or to a partnership in which InterMedia Partners II, L.P. or a
subsidiary thereof is a general partner, or to General Electric Capital Corporation or
its subsidiaries.
Duly and lawfully PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Council, this
day of
Attest:
1992.
Mayor
Clerk
0
The undersigned, being the duly appointed, qualified and acting Clerk of the
Council of the City of Hutchinson, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
is a true, correct and accurate copy of Resolution No. duly
and lawfully passed and adopted by the Mayor and Council of the City of Hutchinson
on the _ day of , 1992.
Clerk
-2- •
D.D. CABLE PARTNERS. L.P.
236 Montgomery Street, Suite 420, San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 616 -4600 FAX (415) 397 -4706
NEWS RELEASE FOR INFORMATION CONTACT: ALAN D. MUTTER
(415) 616-4660
DD. CABLE PARTNERS TO ACQUIRE
STAR MIDWEST. INC. CABLE SYSTEMS
SAN FRANCISCO - -D.D. Cable Partners, L.P., announced today that it will
acquire the cable systems currently owned by Star Midwest, Inc.
The properties being acquired serve approximately 110,000 subscribers throughout
four Midwestern states. The systems are located in Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota and
Wisconsin.
D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. is a limited partnership whose general partner is
InterMedia Partners II and whose limited partner is General Electric Capital Corporation.
InterMedia Partners owns and operates cable television systems in Arizona, Hawaii,
California, Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina. The company,
which serves more than 320,000 cable customers, is among the fastest growing cable
companies in the United States. GECC is a multibillion - dollar company with investments
throughout the United States, many in the cable television industry.
"The management strength of D.D. and the financial strength of
GECC will ensure that the subscribers of Star Midwest will have the finest
possible service at a fair price," said Leo J. Hindery, Jr., Managing General
Partner of InterMedia Partners II, and Murry K Stegelmann, Vice
President of the GECC Corporate Finance Group.
The transaction is expected to close early in 1992.
�_ /a,
I
G
0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM HAZEL SITZ. PERSONNEL COORDINATOR -
RE PAY EQUITY REPORT
The City's required Pay Equity report has been completed. It needs to be
approved by the City Council, signed by the Mayor, and forwarded to the State
Department of Employee Relations before January 31, 1992.
Under the revised reporting rules, part time employees working 14 hours a week
or more are included in the report and the value of health insurance is
included in the maximum monthly salary for each job classification. Since
part time employees do not receive insurance benefits, this could lead to a
determination by DOER that the City is not in compliance with Pay Equity as
regards female part time employees. (The value of family health insurance is
presently $2.00 per hour.)
We have been advised by DOER that a determination regarding compliance will be
received in several months. There is an appeal process and a time frame for
compliance.
City Hall Parks & Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
qr (:�� I
January 17. 1992
Pay Equity Implementation Report
Submit by Jarxiory 31, 1992 to:
F
f
9
c
e
x� W �
W 15
Pay Equity Coordinator
Department of Employee Relations
200 Centenrdd Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155 (612 - 296 -2653)
Name of Jurisdiction
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
© City
Address
❑ County ❑ School
37 Washin A ve W
Contact Person Hazel Sitz
For Department We Only
�— Postmark Date of R
Jurisdiction ID Number
❑ Other:
0 The Job evaluation system used measured ski, effort
responsibility and working conditions and the some
system was used for all classes of employees.
Check one of the following:
❑ State Job Match
® Designed Own (specify)
Modified consultant's plan
❑ Consultant's System (specify)
❑ Other (specify)
Q Benefits for male and female classes of comparable
value have been evaluated and:
❑ There is no difference and female classes are not
at a disadvantage.
® There is a difference and the maxkrwm salaries
reported Include the monthly amount paid by the
employer forheatth Insur Th di fferenc
i f s ��� �j ,�Q en d der based b on
Q Infortfifdion . 0 �eporr r,5c a t to and accurate.
0 The report Includes all classes of employees over
which the Jurisdiction has final budgetary approval
authority.
Result from Salary Range Worksheet
Phone 612 - 587 -5151
© No ranges /performance differences. Check one:
❑ This Jurisdiction does not have salary ranges for any of it
classes. Documentation about performance differ-
ences Is available upon request to explaln apparent
Inequities between male and female classes.
® This Item does not apply to this Jurlsd(ction.
® An official notice has been posted at
__Administrative Office
InformIng employees that the Pay Equity Implementatlon
Report has been filed and Is available to employees upon
request. Also, a copy of the report has been sent to each
excl representative, It any, and a copy has been made
available In the public library. The report was approved by:
Paul L. Ackland -
(chiefelectedoffck* prbt)
x
(chief elected oft &Oxy ve)
Mayor
Oft) (date)
O % is the result after average years to salary range maximum for mde classes is divided by the
average years to salary range maximum for female classes.
Results from Exceptional Service Pay Worksheet
® Less than 20% of male classes receive ESP.
% is the result from the worksheet (percentage of female classes receiving ESP is divided by
the percentage of male classes receiving ESP).
S 2 713,917. 06 is the annual payroll for 1991.
(Part F on Back) ?— (�r
0
PART F: JobTfacs Information orgtion _p 1 Date _January 24. 19 92
rTTY (1F HTTTC:HTNSON. MN
(Nave of Jurisdiction)
37 Washington Ave W
(Address)
Hutchinson, MN 55350
(Address)
A
Class
1.
2.
3,
4,
5.
Title
Custodial Worker
Liquor Store Clerk C
Transit Dispatcher
Senior Program Supervisor
Motor Vehicle Clerk
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
6.
Receptionist
PT
7.
T•i =,inr Stnrp rl prk u
PT
S.
Building Custodian
PT
9.
Bus Driver
M. F. B
10.
Custodian /Boiler Operator
Monthly to 2r of Service
Salary Ins•)Max Service Pay
11.
Liq,unr Store 1 k A
M
12.
Park Maintenance GenerRl
$ _1204 0
13.
Water A - o int Technician
B
14.
Office
$ 1017 0
15.
Accounting Specialist
PT
16.
; 1109
; 1501 0
612- 587 -5151 To convert hourly
Phone rate to monthly,
multiply rate 173.3
B
C
D
E
F
G H I J
Number of
Male
Number of
Female
Class
Type
Comparable
Work Value
Minimum
Monthly
Maximu7jjjcl Years * Years Exceptional
Employees
Employees
M. F. B
(Job Points)
Salary
Monthly to 2r of Service
Salary Ins•)Max Service Pay
1
0
M
250
$ 835
$ _1204 0
4
2
B
325
$ 960
$ 1017 0
0
3
F
475
; 1109
; 1501 0
0
1
F
475
$ 109
$ 1501 0
0
4
F
475
$ 1109
$ 1501
0
3
F
550
$ 1192
1
0
M
550
$ 1192
$ 1613 _0
2
0
M
550
$ 1192
$ 1613 0
2
0
M
625
$ 1282
$ 1735 (9 81)0
1
0
h
625
$1282
$ 1735 (2081)_
_ 1
1
B
625
$1282
$ 1735 (2081) 0
_ 1
0
M
625
$ 1282
$ 1735 (20 81)0 _
0
1
F
700
$ 1379
$ 1865 (20
0
3
F
700
$ 1379
$ 1865 (20 0 ,.
0
1
F
700
$ 1379
$ 1865 0
$
$
Please make additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction.
Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155
Questions: Call (612)296 -2653
50WPPCOMP
0 PART F: lass Information - P g. 2 Date
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
(Name of Jurisdiction)
(Address)
(Address)
A
Class Title
1. Pgrsonnel/Tnsurance Technician
2. Secretary_- Engineering
3. police Dispatcher * FT & PT
4. _Polirp nffirpr PT
S. Water /Wastewater Maint Tech._
6. Laboratory T c ni ri an
7. Administrative Q rrptary
9. Finance Technician
9. _Motor Vehicle Deputy Registrar
10. Water /Wastewater Plant Operato
11. Senior Wastewater Maint. Tech.
12, _Cemetery Maintenance Superviso
13. Enizineering Technician II
14. Equipment Mechanic
15. Straat /Park Maint Operator
16. Recreation Programmer AFT & PT
Phone
B C 0 E
To convert hourly
rate to monthly,
multiply rate 173.3
F G H
I J
Number of
Male
Number of
Female
Class
Type
Comparable
Mork Value
Minimum
Monthly
Maximum Years * Years Exceptional
Monthly (I nc lto
Emoloveas
Ealovees
M. F. B
(Job Points)
Salary
Oz of Service
Salary Ins - $AX- Service Par
0
1
F
775
; 1482
; 2005 (2 _
0
1
F
775
; 1482
; 2005 (23 51)0
FT
_
n
=6
P_
775
; 1 82
; 2005*(93 _
2
0
M
775
; 1482
; 2005 Q_
1
0
M
850
;1593
; 2156 (2502)_
0
_.
F
850
; 1593
; 2156 (25 02)_
O
1
F
850
;1593
; 2156 (2502_
0
1
F
850
; 1593
$ _2156 (25
0
1
F
850
; 1593
; 2156 (25
2
0
M
950
; 1712
;2317 (26
1
0
M
950
= 1712
; 231? (26
1
0
M
950
; 1712
; 2317 (26
2
0
M
950
; 1712
; 2317 (26
1
0
M
950
; 1712
; 2317 (26 )0
11
.--a._
M_
950
; 1712
; _2317 (26 )0
2 FT
1 PT
B
950
; 1712
; 2317 *(26 00
Please make additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction.
Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155
Questions: Call (612)296 -2653
50MPPCOMP
• PART F: Jobs Information _P g. 3 Date 0
(Nave o Jurisdiction)
(Address)
(Address)
rate to monthly,
multiply rate 173.3
F
Phone
Minimum
Monthl y
Maximum yyears
Monthly ( Inc to isr
Sal�ry
Salary InslM�ax
A
B
C
D
E
$ .2549 (98 ) 3
; 1820
; 2549 UA 950 _
Number of
Number of
Class
Comparable
Class
Title
; 2073
Male
Employees
Female
Eenlovees
Type
M. F. B
Mork Value
(JoD Point)
1.
Spninr
Waatpwntpr Plant O:gprat
1
; 3085 (34
M
1050
2.
Park Maintenance
Supervisor
1
0
M
1050
3.
-Police
Patrol Officer
10
0
M
1050
4.
Forester
1
0
M
1050
5.
W ntpr
S3Zatpma Si,n rvi qnr
1
0
M
1150
6.
Street
/Maint. Op. Supervisor
2
0
M
1150
7.
Police
/School Liaison Officer
0
1
F
1150
8.
R„i� ldin
Tpqnectnr
1
0
M
1150
9.
Assistant
Recreation Dir. PT
1
0
M
1150
10.
Personnel
/Transit Coord.
0
1
F
1150
11,
Asst,
to City Engineer
1
0
M
1275
12.
Recreation Facilities Mgr.
1
0
M
1275
13.
Liquor
Store Manager
1
0
M
1275
14.
Police
Sergeant
3
0
M
1275
15.
Police
Investigator
1
0
M
1275
16.
Small Cities Project Coord.
0
1
F
1275
To convert hourly
rate to monthly,
multiply rate 173.3
F
G H
Minimum
Monthl y
Maximum yyears
Monthly ( Inc to isr
Sal�ry
Salary InslM�ax
$ 1820
; 2549 U 95 )_
; 1820
; 2549 U R
; 1995
$ .2549 (98 ) 3
; 1820
; 2549 UA 950 _
; 2073
; 2804 ( 31 50)0 _
; 2073
; 2804 ( 0 —
; 2073
$ _ - 2804 31 _
; 2073
; 2804 (31 0
$ 1073
; 2804 (31
; 207 3
; 2804 (31
$ 2281
; 3085 (34 _
; 2281
; 3085 (34
; 2281
; 3085 (34 _
; 2281
; 3085 (34 ?0•
; 2281
; 3085 (34 _
; 2281
$ _ L085 (34 _
Please make additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction.
Return to: Faith Zwemke, Department of Employee Relations, 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155
Questions: Call (612)296 -2653
50WPPCOMP
I J
* Years Exceptional
of Service
Service _ PiY
9 PART F: * ass Information P g , 4 Date
CITY.I�F HUT - ON
(Nam! of Jurisdiction)
(Address)
rate to
monthly,
multiply
rate 173.3
F
G H
Phone
Maximum Years
(IncltO RE
Sa lary
(Address)
$ 2508
$ 3394 (371
; 2508
$ 3394 (371 0
A
8
C
D
E
$ 4123 (446 0
Number of
Number of
Class
Comparable
Class Title
Male
Ewoll ayges
Female
Ewnloyess
Type
M. F_ B
Work Value
j ob Points)
1. gui l di ng official
1
0
M
1400
2. Fire Marshal
1
0
M
1400
3. W-s.a-tor Water /Wastewater Oper
1
0
M
1400
4. Director Parks & Recreation
1
0
M
1525
S. Director of Finance
1
0
M
1650
6. Chief of Police
1
0
M
1650
7. ntrprnr cf Engineering
1
0
M
1800
a. City Administrator
1
0
M
1950
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1S.
16.
To convert hourly
rate to
monthly,
multiply
rate 173.3
F
G H
Minimum
Maximum Years
(IncltO RE
Sa lary
Salary Ma
Ins
$ 2508
$ 3394 (371
; 2508
$ 3394 (371 0
$ 2508
; 3394 (371 0
$ 2759
$ 3733 (407 0
$ 3035
$ 4123 (446 0
0 035
$ 4123 (446 0
$ 3338
$ 4517 (486 0
$ 3673
$ 4969 (53 0
S
$
$
$
i
$
S
S
S
i
S
i
i
$
Please make additional copies of this form as needed to allow space for all the job classes in your jurisdiction.
Return to: Faith Zwemke. Department of Employee Relations. 200 Centennial Building, 658 Cedar Street, St. Paul, MN 55155
Questions: Call (612)296 -2653
SOWPPCOMP
I J
# Years Exceptional
of Service
Service pay
•
TO: Mayor and Council
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Steve Madson, Chief of Police
DATE: January 23, 1992
RE: Policy Updates
Attached hereto please find policy updates which have been
completed by the police department. These updates have been
necessary due to either statutory changes or supreme court
decisions which have mandated changes in current operations.
The first policy change is that of the "Firearms" policy directive
P150. This policy has been updated to comply with Chapter 141 and
essentially delineates the firearms training for the police
department.
The ,second policy change is in the area of "Use of Force" directive
P151. The substantive part of this policy was previously contained
under directive P150, however, has been broken out and is now an
• independent directive due to this department being required to
comply with Minnesota Statute Chapter 141.
The third policy change is in the area of the "Emergency Response
Team" directive P191. Essentially this directive has been updated
to incorporate and reflect P150 as the guide for live fire
exercises.
The fourth policy change is in the area of "Court Appearances"
directive P320. This policy is updated to comply with the recent
supreme court decision establishing a rule of 48 hours from the
time of arrest until the time an individual must be taken before
a judge or a probable cause determination is held.
Of the four policy updates I would ask that you read closely
directive P151 on the use of force as this directive has the
greatest potential for civil liability exposure to the city of
Hutchinson.
I request that these policy updates be approved at the January 28,
1992, regular meeting of the Hutchinson City Council.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding these policy
updates please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest
convenience. Also, I will be in attendance at the January 28
• meeting if you have any questions at that time.
/lkg
92 -01 -0001
DICTATED BUT NOT READ
�-I)-
o�
D
r
m
N
8 FIRST
:00.70
to
p, ;V.r
1'11.7 •� ,� �
1 I
1 I
I
II-
w
w
M .
N N o
b"
Z
a
a
9
mill go I) .•'
- .isle )o
i
e OL
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for CITY OF HUTCHINS
Eum
171.9)
•�.
N99•M1I'C
hl '•
I
4
I
I
I'
I:,
1 1
•
<
I I
I •.
ers
I
.
1
131 90
WASHINGTON
I I I
,
0
Z
1
N
N
I +
N
( r �
uaro m au �.
AVENUE NORTHEAST
('Ir r.1.ewM .r
40%-29 BI ( °'�N••••
70M euo
It 30' Y o0 -
ap f0
Iz sa - •)zn �w nz ll •'':. - -. \' � - swou� __. .h-.
I l r.
1 a r jSI 1
W f l :; 8 y o
LLJ - - - - -- ------ - -- - - - -� -- "w
/ vzu con -aeln to rz w uao $n n _ �`` �`w�l O
W +
W u• j' O I P1 I �
A '
° ao O a� s BLOCKS 47 n
I r a!
-- ---- --- - - - - -- --- - - �1 1 I ij
LLJ
LL
LL 4
W °
1 y
6 a I
k 1
ez )o n no
200.60
w 99•fl'14 E
AVENUE
� ^user � ep i.enn.. ..r. •.pwu �r w ..a. r.r s � . • e.p iee �
, pr n �a e...W ems .�o ...o . ^er• ,.... �.. sir,.. w•e,,., r • e
N
nunr° sere epuraU ruRn.leY epgbu _� — :er ro onto we. v .r reel u
0
Member introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON
AMENDMENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO- 4, THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO. 4, AND THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.5 AND ON
THE ADOPTION OF THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 6
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota (the "City ") as follows:
1. This Council acting under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.124 to 469.134, has previously established Development District No. 4 in
the City (the "Development District "), and approved a Development Program and
amendments thereto (as so amended, the Progran) for the Development District.
• The City has established a tax increment financing district (the "Original Tax
Increment District "), which includes substantially all of the original area in the
Development District and has also established a tax increment financing district
designated as Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 5 ( "Tax
Increment District No. 5"), which includes area added to the Development District
on April 24, 1990 and a portion of the original area in the Development District. It
has been proposed that the City approve amendments (the Amendments ") to the
Program and to the tax increment financing plans for the Original Tax Increment
District and for Tax increment District No. 5, and that the City adopt Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 6
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179 (the "Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 6 "), which establishes
Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District No. 6 (the 'Tax Increment District
No. 6 ") as a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, subdivision 9.
I A public hearing is hereby scheduled to be held by this Council on
March 10, 1992 at o'clock P.M., on the Amendments and on the adoption of
the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment District No. 6. The City
Administrator is hereby authorized to cause notice of such public hearing in
substantially the form of Exhibit A hereto to be published in the official newspaper
•
9 -F
of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing, and to provide the
information required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 2 to the
appropriate governmental bodies.
Passed by the Council this 28th day of January, 1992.
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
•
•
•
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Member
and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by
the Mayor, whose signature was attested by the City Administrator.
•
EXFIIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO THE
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCE PLAN FOR
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4, AND THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT
DISTRICT NO. 5 AND APPROVAL OF A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT
DISTRICT NO. 6
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Hutchinson will hold a public hearing on proposed amendments (the
"Amendments ") to the Development Program (the "Development Program ") and
Finance Plan for Development District No. 4 (the "Development District ") and the
Tax Increment Financing Plan for Redevelopment Tax Increment District No. 5
previously established by the City, and on the proposed approval by the City Council
of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan for District No. 6 ") which
creates a Tax Increment Financing District to be designated as Redevelopment Tax
Increment District No. 6 ( "Tax Increment District No. 6 ") in the City. The public
hearing will be held at p.m. on Tuesday, March 10, 1992, at the Hutchinson City
Hall, 37 Washington Avenue West, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Under the Amendments and the Financing Plan for District No. 6, tax
increments from tax increment financing districts located in the Development
District will be used for the payment of costs of the City of carrying out the
Development Program or for the payment of debt service on bonds or other
obligations to be issued by the City for payment of such costs. It is proposed that all
tax increment revenues from Tax Increment District No. 6 and the other tax
increment districts in the Development District resulting from increases in the tax
capacity of taxable real property therein be segregated and applied to payment of costs
of the City in carrying out the Development Program.
Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion of the City. The map
shows the area from which the tax increments may be collected and the area in
which tax increments may be expended.
All who wish to be heard as to the Amendments and on the approval
of the Financing Plan for District No. 6 will be given an opportunity to express their
views at the time of the public hearing or may file written comments with the City
Administrator prior to the public hearing.
By /s/ Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
MODIFICATION TO DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT NO.4
and
CREATING
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO.6
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO.6
and
AMENDING REDEVELOPMENT TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO.5
CITY OF HUTCHINSON ( MCLEOD COUNTY) MINNESOTA
HEARING: MARCH 10, 1992
ADOPTED: MARCH 10, 1992
MAILED TO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 423, JANUARY _, 1992
MAILED TO MCLEOD COUNTY, JANUARY _, 1992
FILED: MARCH _ , 1992 WITH MCLEOD COUNTY AUDITOR
FILED: MARCH _, 1992 WITH MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR
•
DRAFT FOR HEARING
ZHutch14
J
•
INTRODUCTION
History The City created two Development Districts in downtown Hutchinson in 1977 and
1978 for the redevelopment of the Central Business District. In 1980 an additional
Development District was created as an inducement for shopping center development (along
with Industrial Development Bonds), and a Development District for a part of the industrial
Park. in 1982, the Development Districts were combined into Development District No. 4.
Later in the 1980's, the Shopping Center portion of the Development District was terminated
and returned to the tax rolls.
In 1990, Development District No. 4 was the subject of an agreement by Shopko to build a
new retail facility in downtown. The result was a modification to the Tax Increment Plan by
creating Tax Increment District No. 5.
This modification adds additional area to the Development District, part of which will be for the
second phase of the Shopko Project, by the addition of More 4, a major grocery store (Tax
Increment District No. 6), and added retail space. Also, area will be added that is consistent
with the comprehensive Plan for the further redevelopment of downtown Hutchinson.
SECTION I. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 4
A. Definitions
• For the purposes of the Development District Program, the following terms shall have the
meanings specified below, unless the context otherwise requires:
"City" means the city of Hutchinson, a municipal corporation under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the
objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use,
development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"City Council" or "Council" means the Hutchinson City Council.
"City Development District Act" or "Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.124
through 469.134 as amended.
"County" means McLeod County, Minnesota.
"Development District" means Development District No. 4 which is modified by the
addition of land area pursuant to and in accordance with the City Development
District Act.
"Development District Program" or "Program" means the program for development
of the District adopted by the City pursuant to the Development District Act.
"Project Area" or "Project" means the property within Development District No. 4, as
described in the Development Program.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means any g eneral obligation or revenue tax increment
bonds issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Development
District No. 4 as stated in the Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for
the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 4 or any
obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds.
"Tax Increment Financing District" or "TIF District" means any Tax Increment
Financing District created and established pursuant to the TIF Act within
Development District No. 4.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the TIF Plan adopted by the
Council for any TIF District within Development District No. 4.
B. Statutory Authority
The City has determined that it is necessary, desirable and in the public interest to modify
Development District No. 4 in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Act. This
Development District Modification has been prepared under the requirements of the
Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the "Act*), Minnesota Statutes, Section 469, as
amended. The City herein proposes to expand (described fully in Exhibit A)
Development District No. 4 to provide financing for a commercial development proposed
to be constructed by Erickson Diversified Corporation and the Everest Group, Ltd. (the
"Developer") and other undesignated developers. The City has also determined that the
funding of the necessary activities and improvements in Development District No. 4 shall
• be accomplished in part or in whole through tax increment financing in accordance with
the TIF Act.
rell&M r7 Ici . . � .. _ . •. .y
The City has found that there is a need for new development in a specific area of the city
to encourage development, provide employment opportunities, improve the tax base and
improve the general economy of the City and the State.
The City seeks to achieve the following objectives through the Development Program:
1. Promote and secure the prompt development of property In Development District
No. 4 In a manner consistent with the comprehensive Plan and with minimal adverse
Impact on the environment, which property is currently less productive because of
the lack of proper utilization and lack of investment, thus promoting and securing the
development of other land in the City;
2. Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within Development
District No. 4 the City, and the State, for residents of the city and the surrounding
area, thereby improving living standards and preventing unemployment and the loss
of skilled labor and other human resources in the City and the State;
3. Secure the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, county, school
district, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for
public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be
provided by them;
4. Secure the construction and provide funds for the payment of the cost of public
activities or improvements in Development District No. 4, which are necessary for
the orderly and beneficial development of the district;
5. Promote the concentration of appropriate development within Development District
No. 4 in order to maintain the area in manner consistent with its accessibility and
prominence in the City; and
6. Encourage local business expansion, improvement, development and
redevelopment, when compatible with the Development Program.
D. Environmental Controls
It is anticipated that no development within the Development District will present major
environmental concerns. All city actions, public improvements and private development will
be carried out in a manner that complies with applicable environmental standards.
E. Open Space to be Created
Any open space within the expanded Development District will be created in accordance
with the development controls of City.
• F. Public Facilities to be Constructed
Public facilities constructed within the expanded Development District will be financially
feasible and compatible with the City's long range development plans. Such facilities may
Include street, utilities, storm sewers, and drainage improvements.
G. Proposed Reuse of Prop
The City plans to acquire property within the expanded Development District which will be
utilized by the Development District.
H. Development District Financing
Within Development District No. 4, the City is creating TIF District No. 6 (redevelopment).
Public improvements in the Development District will be financed in part with tax increment
from the respective TIF Districts.
I. Relocation
The City accepts its responsibility for providing for relocation pursuant to Section 469.133
of the Act. If relocation is necessary, provision will be made in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 117.50 through 117.56, inclusive.
J. Administration of Development District
Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the
Administrator of Development District No. 4. Each year the Administrator will submit to the
city Council the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The Administrator
will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section 469.131 of the
Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the City
Council. No action taken by the administrator shall be effective without authorization by the
City Council. 3
The City does not anticipation the need to create an adviso board to advise the
City council on the planning, construction or implementation 07 the activities and
Improvements outlined in the Development District Program.
K. Rehabilitation
Owners of properties within Development District No. 4 may be encouraged to
rehabilitate their properties to conform to the applicable state and local codes and ordinances,
as well as any design standards implemented by the city. Owners who purchase property
within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties
as a condition of sale. The City may provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be
available from federal, state or local sources.
R _ M j • i • 1 • 1119=7 • • 11 =l 9 1 71 u•.• 1 = I • l
A map and legal description of the Development District modification are included in
Exhibit A herein.
n
LJ
4
0 SECTION II. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
A. Use of Tax Increment
Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 4, of the Tax Increment Act, all revenues derived
from the Tax Increment District shall be used in accordance with the tax increment
financing plan. The revenues shall be used for the following purposes:
1. to pay the principal of and interest on bonds used to finance a project;
2. to finance or otherwise pay the capital and administration costs of the Development
District pursuant to the Development District Act;
3. to pay for project costs as identified in the budget; and
4. to finance or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in Section 469.176,
Subd. 4, of the Tax Increment Act.
These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limits.
B. Use of Tax Increment
Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Act, in the year in which the
tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the tax
Increment financing plan including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as
provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subd. 3, the City shall use the excess
is amounts to:
1. prepay any outstanding bonds;
2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor;
3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bonds; or
4. return the excess amount to the County Auditor for distribution as provided in
Section 469.176, Subd. 2, of the Tax Increment Act.
r
5
11 1 = 1 • I • 1 = 11 = 1
0 Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 1, of the Tax Increment Act:
1. No tax increment shall be paid to the City for the Tax Increment District after three (3)
years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity value of the taxable
property in the Tax Increment District by the County Auditor unless within the three 3)
year period: (a) bonds have been issued pursuant to Section 469.178 or in aid of a
project pursuant to any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Chapter
474 prior to August 1, 1979, or (b) the City has acquired property within the Tax
Increment District or (c) the City has constructed or caused to be constructed public
Improvements within the Tax Increment District.
2. The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be
discharged and the Tax Increment District may be terminated If sufficient funds have
been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow account held in
trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or
redemption date.
3. The City has determined that parcels constituting 70% of the area of the proposed Tax
Increment Financing District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other
Improvements and more than 20% of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are
structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. At
least 30% of the area of each parcel contains improvements. These findings qualify
the district as a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 10(2). No tax increment shall in any event be paid to the City
from the Tax Increment District after twenty five (25) years from the date of the receipt
of the first tax increment or after the goals of this plan have been satisfied, whichever
comes first. Modification of this tax increment financing plan pursuant to Section
• 469.176, Subd. 4 of the Tax Increment Act shall not extend the durationai limits of the
provision.
At least 90% of the tax increments derived from the redevelopment district will be used
for redevelopment - related costs.
4. if, after four (4) years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity value
of the Tax Increment District pursuant to Section 469.177 of the Tax Increment Act, no
demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including
improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of an underground
utility service, has been commenced on a parcel located within the Tax Increment
District by the City or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment
financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel, and the
original net tax capacity value of that parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax
capacity value of the Tax Increment District. If the City or the owner o the parcel
subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site
preparation on that parcel, including improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in
accordance with tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the County
Auditor that the activity has commenced, and the County Auditor shall certify the net
tax capacity value thereof as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue
and add it to the original net tax capacity value of the Tax Increment District. For
purposes of this subdivision, "parcel" means a tract or plat of land established as a
single unit for purposes of assessment.
r
A list will be maintained by the City to document all building permits issued within the
District for private redevelopment including alterations, additions, new construction
and demolition.
Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 3, of the Tax Increment Act, no tax increment shall
be used to pa any administrative expenses for the Tax Increment District which exceed
ten percent (10%) of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the tax increment
financing plan or the total tax increment expenditures for the Tax Increment District,
whichever is less.
The parcels identified for acquisition at this time are those comprising the entire Tax
Increment District No. 6.
1. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the City only in order to
accomplish one or more of the following: provide land for needed public streets,
utilities and facilities; cant' out clearance and a demolition program to accomplish
the uses and objectives set forth in the Development.
2. The following are conditions under which properties not designated to be acquired
may be acquired.
The City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from
willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this tax increment financing plan.
Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance
the acquisition and related costs.
F. Estimate of Project Investment
The City has received a proposal and executed a Development Agreement for the
redevelopment of Block 47 and abutting rights of way. The City has received proposals
for the redevelopment of Block 47 Including abutting rights -of -way.
The City expects total Redevelopment Project Investment for property tax purposes to be
$1,250,000 in Block 47.
There are no development activities related to this plan for which contracts have already
been entered into.
The City reasonably expects to have a Developer or Developers for the redevelopment of
Block 47.
The Redevelopment Program contemplates a completed project within 12 to 14 months
for the redevelopment of Tax Increment District No. 6. The City expects to expend all tax
increments received from the tax increment district.
i
V51
item Estimated Cost
(See Exhibit B)
• R=777 11 =1
Tax increments generated in Redevelopment Tax Increment District No. 6 will be paid by
McLeod County to the City of Hutchinson for its Tax Increment Activities for said District.
The City will use the tax increment funds in accordance with the provisions of the
Development Agreement.
Tax increment is the primary source of revenue for public costs. The City may also use
special assessments, user charges and land sales and other revenue to defray public
costs.
J. Estimate of Tax Increment
The estimate of tax increment is set forth on the following pages.
K. Or Net Tax Capacfty Value
. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1, of the Tax Increment Act, the Original Net Tax
Capacity Value ( "ONTO ") for Tax Increment District No. 6 is estimated to be $16,551 on
all taxable real property within the Tax Increment District. Pursuant to Section 469.177,
Subds. 1 and 2 of the Tax Increment Act, the County Auditor shall certify in each year
(beginning in the payment year 1994) the amount by which the original net tax capacity
value has increased (see next section) or decreased as a result of a change in tax
exempt propPerty within the Tax Increment District, reduction or enlargement of the Tax
Increment Distnct or changes in connection with previously issued building permits. In
am year in which the current net tax capacity value of the Tax Increment District declines
be ow the ONTO, no net tax capacity value will be captured and no tax increment will be
payable to the City.
0
n
L. Current Net Tax Capacity Value
The current net tax capacity value is the same as the original net tax capacity value set
forth in Subsection K.
X _. :. T: r - lt, = t
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2 and 4, of the Tax Increment Act, the estimated
captured net tax capacity value in the Tax Increment District No. 6 within Development
District No. 4 as of January 2, 1993 (for 1994 collection), first captured date, will be
$57,725.
The City expects to use 100% of the captured net tax capacity and the resulting
Increments.
l =11 =1 1= 1 l• h• l 1- 1= 11i M riMMM-M1111 1�1
The tax increment received with respect to the Tax Increment District shall be segregated
by the City in a special account or accounts on its official books and records.
o 9 . 1.
Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 1, of the Tax Increment Act, the duration of Tax
Increment District No. 6 within Development District No. 4 of the City will be no more than
twenty five (25) years after the date of receipt by the City of the first tax increment or the
point at which the City's plan has been satisfied. The date of receipt by the City of the
first tax increment will be approximately July 15, 1994.
The City expects the District's duration will be the maximum permitted by law.
• P. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
It is anticipated that net tax capacity value of the parcels included in the Tax Increment
District will remain stable from year to year after project completion because of the
construction thereon, the impact of tax increment financing on the net tax capacity values
of all taxing jurisdictions in which the Tax Increment District is located In whole or in part
would also remain stable from year -to -year. Based on this assumption, it is anticipated
that tax increments will be captured annually. The estimate is based on the qualifications
Identified in this report and does not include the possible tax increment derived from any
other future development, tax capacity changes or inflation factors.
0
K
•
Latest Net Tax Capacity I f Each
Government Body (latest figures available)
1990/91
1990/91
Net Tax
Eby
Net Tax
Capacity Rates
Percentage
of total
McLeod County
$12,654,484
35.366
28.89%
I.S.D. No. 423 (Hutchinson)
6,433,090
52.199
42.64%
City of Hutchinson
5,034,937
34.656
28.31%
Regional Development Commission
12,654,484
.191
.16%
Total
122.412
100.00%
School District No. 423 comprised 42.64% of the 1990 /91 tax capacity rate, while McLeod
County comprised 28.89 %. The City of Hutchinson made up 28-31% of the 1990/91
cumulative tax capacity levy for the taxing jurisdictions affected by the Tax Increment District
proposal, and the RDC was 0.16% A tax capacity rate of 122.412 has been utilized in this tax
Increment financing plan.
If the new taxes estimated within the Redevelopment Tax Increment District are captured for
the duration of the District, taxes and values will experience no change until termination of the
District. After that time, the amounts identified below will be available to the taxing
jurisdictions.
If the new taxes upon completion were not captured (and if the project could be done without
tax increment financing), they would be distributed annually as follows:
McLeod County $14,561
I.S.D. No. 423 (Hutchinson) 21,471
City of Hutchinson 14,264
Regional Development Commission 106
Total $50,4
The City is subject to reporting requirements specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.175, Subd. 5, 6 and 6A and will comply with said requirements.
•
ius
R. Requirements for Agreements with the Develop
• Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 5, of the Tax Increment Act, no more than ten
percent (10 %), by acreage, of the property to be acquired In the Tax Increment District as
set forth in the tax increment financing plan shall at any time be owned by the City as a
result of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to Section 469.178 of the
Tax Increment Act without the City having, prior to acquisition in excess of ten percent
(10 %) of the acreage, concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of
the property acquired and which provides recourse for the City should the development
not be completed.
S. Assessment Agreements
The City may, upon entering into a development or redevelopment agreement, enter into
a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer or redeveloper of
the property within the Tax Increment District which establishes a minimum market value
of the land and completed Improvements to be constructed thereon, until a specified
termination date, which date shall not be later than the duration of the Tax Increment
District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County Assessor of
McLeod County, who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to
be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the
Improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value
contained in the assessment agreement appears, In the judgment of the County
Assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the Assessor shall certify the minimum market
value contained in the agreement. An assessment agreement is not anticipated for this
proposal.
T. Assumptions and Analysis for Tax Increment Redevelopment District
• Projected Net Tax Capacity Value After Construction $57,725
Current net tax capacity value estimated 1990/91: $16,551
Captured net tax capacity value: $41,174
Projected Timing
First Tax Increment received approximately July 15, 1994
Original Net Tax Capacity Value. Est. $16,551
Captu red Tax Capacity $41,174
Tax Extension Rate 122.412
Estimated Tax Increment $50,402
Tax Capacity Rate
1990/91 Tax Capacity Rate - 122.412
Assumed Future Tax Capac Rate - 122.412
Bond Issue More 4 project: Bonds will be sold in an amount not to exceed $575,000.
0
11
The City anticipates issuing G. O. bonds to finance the activities of the district. (See
Exhibit C).
The tax increment upon completion has been calculated at approximately $50,402,
assuming a static tax capacity rate of 122.412.
c,•= ��- 1• •l • Jurr. - M. ••11 =1 l =11 =1 15 141h1• - 1•
See Exhibit A.
;: .l_.: ..
As required by the Tax Increment Financing Act, in establishing Redevelopment Tax
Increment Financing District No. 6, the determination has been made that the anticipated
development and improvements would not reasonably be expected to occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore
the use of tax increment financing is necessary and has been based upon negotiations
with the developer and upon City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the
subject site.
• 1• =• l zIMM .l
Building permits are expected to be issued in 1992 for redevelopment activities to be
located on Block 47 and rights -of -way.
X. • i • 1 of 1 • PUTTed
The City shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the
County Auditor or its notice of Tax Increment District enlargement with a listing of all
properties within the Tax Increment District or area of enlargement for which building
permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding
approval of the tax increment financing plan by the municipality pursuant to Section
469.175, Subdivision 3, of the Tax Increment Act. The County Auditor shall increase the
original net tax capacity value of the Tax Increment District by the net tax capacity value
of improvements for which a building permit was issued.
The City of Hutchinson is establishing Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District
No. 6 to preserve and enhance the tax base of the City and State and to correct the
blighted condition in Tax Increment Financing District No. 6.
is
12
•
The foregoing program and plan have been prepared on behalf of the City by Ehlers and
Associates, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, and are hereby approved by the City Council of the
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, this day of . 1992.
By:
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
•
13
1. Block 47
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
TAX NCREMENT DISTRICT NO.6
Ii. Street right -of -way as follows:
First Avenue Northeast from the eastern boundary of Jefferson, east to the
eastern most right -of -way line of Adams Street.
Adams Street from the northern most right -of -way line of Jefferson Street
extended, south to the southern most right -of -way of Washington Avenue.
Washington Avenue from the eastern most right -of -way line of Adams Street,
west to the eastern most right -of -way line of Jefferson Street.
III. That part of Adams Street as platted in the Townsite of Hutchinson, North Half,
• according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast comer of Block 47 In said plat; thence South 0
degrees 38 minutes 02 seconds East, assumed bearing., along the east line
of said Block 47 a distance of 222.98 feet; thence North 15 degrees 33
minutes 30 seconds East a distance of 214.14 feet; thence North 74 degrees
26 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 62.18 feet to the point of
beginning.
•
�ii.s . ,. • 1 1 1 . � 1 1
--• 1. .. .. � 1 \`��• _.- I- •--- � -..j_— - --� - -- �►''
it01e M N t
8 FIRST AVENUE NORTHEAST c.or 04124ow 10
ee�•ts to t •+'�w;2��•r!
Ot.00 _ et !o r it r. - `'! • N0� '
to 10 I
w w
�t
e ~ 4M b �_' ~
trnis w rt . ` ,usn so r r / trill le r1 `
� -~left to ri on — e - 4r 1tar� `�+I �/:• •/�- --
-� - — — -- — ---- - -- -- — --- I 7
z UP
a BLOC 48 a s BLOCK 47 s' l ''
e
Q I 11er� !rc t1 J LL I r
1 1 4 7 4 I'f If
(- -- ---_.. ... .. .._.. _... �y .. .. _.._.. .. __... -•---• I .. ._. _ _.. . .. ..— i _-- ..-- .. —... .- - - --I(
i
o�
--1
1
m
N
' t l
i 6 li S
I
1 ri! I .e'
CERTIFICATE OF SURV
131.900
WASHINGTON
for CITY OF HUTCHINS-N -
AVENUE
'.«w►. «.h Ir.1 e.. rwMr +» w2r«M w M « wM• *r M «. wow...•-. w rtre -�
•.�•. 110P L-14~ l«•r lM..N' - .. 10.. N .4t iNN s' ..wMr.N•
r.•we I.w .•Mw, L..MN M sere
er. r.w... I, /ff1
►IU..I../n /..N41.N1 - ..r -..1.■ em.1"
I I
6 S �: Q
.. _ K !e rill e! -
211110.60
»N• to 14 "c
rN -0 01876 rw. r -r! Past If
I
1
CITY OF WrCHINSON, MINNESOTA
PROJECT COSTS
PHASE it
MORE 4 DEVELOPMENT
46,000 sq. ft. Commercial Center
•
BLOCK 48 - TIF 5
Wigen (Lots 1, 2, 4, 5)
Janousek (Lot 3)
BLOCK 47 - TIF 6
Farmers Elevator
Fans Service
Elks
Laundromat
Christopher Trucking and Simonson's
Railroad
0
Total Acquisition and Relocation
Payment of 2nd half 1992 taxes
Demolition
Asbestos Removal
Consultant
Cost of Financing
Bond Discount
Less: Funds on Hand
Administration and Contingency
Construction Interest (Serial Bonds)
Bond Issue
Expected Taxes @ 1.50 /sq. ft.
Frozen Base Taxes (1991)
Increment per Year for Debt Service
$85,000
85,000
215,000
30,000 Zt3
12,000 t
96.321
$816,321
20,000
110,000
20,000
45,000
19,000
9.000
$1,039,321
I
$69,000
$41
,$74
0
Ehlers and Associates, Inc. FILE = NUTCNSER
Financial Advisors 12/30/1991 1:06 PM
YIELD STATISTICS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
Accrued Interest from 03/01/1992 to 03/01/1992...
-
Serial Bands of 1992
14.380 YEARS
Bond Years ......... ...............................
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Average Coupon ..... ...............................
DATE
PRINCIPAL
COUPON
INTEREST
DEBT SERVICE
3/01/1992
-
-
6.1262025%
-
9/01/1992
-
-
14,945.00
14,945.00
3/01/1993
-
14,945.00
14,945.00
9/01/1993
-
1f,94S.00
14 945.00
�l
:1;:7xf<;s>i:::ii:
:. ....................
•: 4 ......:.....:i iii: ii:ivi::•i
ivi:P iT. i. ii}:, t: vil: Yi
%••:.
u. vOC� ^:ti4i:•:4:4i }}iiiiiiiiiiii:
_ ::.::.::::.:..:.
i:G:i ii v: }v;iii ?:::: ^i:};:j j+G. ':
yyyx_ S•1 ::: >........:5:'3:
iiiiii ii };.i;•w•i.:w:iiiiii };;.:.:i:•
. ...... .. ....� ?.::•ii:ii:t :. ...
ii::•.wrv�: iiii:iv::::�:.
:!:......
ff
l
9/01/1994
-
-
14,945.00
14,945.00
3/01/1995
15,000.00
4.SOOW%
14,945.00
29,945.00
9/01/1995
-
-
14,607.50
14,607.50
3/01 /1996
000.00
4.75000%
14 607.50
29,607.50
}011 996.
_15
>:........
:; >::.::
»::......<F ►,251 5> ....:..........111:;25
f. 5 ::
3/01/1997
15,000.00
5.00000%
14,251.25
29,251.25
9/01/1997
-
13,876.25
13,876.25
3/01/1998
15,000.00
5.15000%
13,876.25
28,876.25
9/01/1998
13,490.00
13,490.00
;:3/01!:1999
:..::..:.. #5iOD ::..:..30D007G'
>' #4D6C'
.:....:...:..ZB 491LDO
9/01/1999
-
13,092.50
13,092.50
3/01/2000
20,000.00
5.45000%
13,092.50
33,092.50
9/01/2000
-
12,547.50
12,547.50
3/01 /2001
20.000-00
5.60000%
12, 547.50
32, 547.50 .
: >.::9J01/2001
. ..
-.
•...
...............11,;r8T.W,
3/01/2002
20,000.00
5.75000%
11,987.50
31,987.50
9/01/2002
-
-
11,412.50
11,412.50
3/01/2003
20,000.00
5.90000%
11,412.50
31,412.50
9/01/2003
-
10,822
t0,a22 50
3/01/2004
25,000.00 .:'
:.11.00000% .
,:......!0,8225:50.
;: :.:......35;822 50 : : :-
9/01/2004
-
-
10,072.50
10,072.50
3/01/2005
25,000.00
6.00000%
10,072.50
35,072.50
9/01/2005
-
9,322.50
9,322.50
3/01/2006
25,000.00
6.10000%
9,322.50
34,322.50
9/0172006
.. . -
_ : ::':15,560 >00
3/01/2007
25;000.00
6.15000%
8,560.00
33,560.00
9/01/2007
-
-
7,791.25
7,791.25
3/01/2008
30,000.00
6.20000%
7,791.25
37,791.25
9/01/2008
-
-
6,861.25
6,861 25
:3/01/2009
..
...;30.000.:00
..: `./1.'250001:
x.,86125 ...r
':...36;861 25
9/01/2009
-
-
5,923.75
5,923.75
3/01/2010
35,000.00
6.30000%
5,923.75
40,923.75
9/01/2010
-
-
4,821.25
4,821.25
3/01/2011
35,000.00
6.35000%
4,821.25
39,821.25
3/01/2012
35,000.00
6.40000%
3,710.00
38,710.00
9/01/2012
-
-
2,590.00
2,590.00
3/01/2013
40,000.00
6.450 00%
2,590.00
42,590.00
9/
-
1,300.00
1,300 00
::.
: 00
.00 .
.A0 ::
TOTAL
500,000.00
443,750.00
943,750.00
Ehlers and Associates, Inc. FILE = NUTCNSER
Financial Advisors 12/30/1991 1:06 PM
YIELD STATISTICS
Accrued Interest from 03/01/1992 to 03/01/1992...
-
A verage Life ....... ...............................
14.380 YEARS
Bond Years ......... ...............................
7,190.00
Average Coupon ..... ...............................
6.1717663%
Net Interest Cost ( NIC) ...........................
6.1717663%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes .................
6.1262025%
T rue Interest Cost (TIC) ..........................
6.1262025%
Effective Interest Cost (EIC) .....................
6.1262025%
e
1
DOW
January 17. 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
TO MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM HAZEL SITZ. PERSONNEL COORDINATOR A ' S
RE AMAIR SAFETY MANUAL
A new Safetv Manual has been developed to comply with the 'ANAIR ACT' to
Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction Act) which was passed by the Minnesota
Legislature. Minnesota OSHA is the enforcement authority for the AMAIR ACT.
Upon approval by the City Council, copies of the manual will be distributed to
city employees.
0
• City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
C
1991
•
•
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD. I
I. SAFETY POLICY STATEMENT 2
II. EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITIES 2
III. SAFETY COMMITTEE 3
IV. SAFETY TALKS 3
V. NEW EMPLOYEE TRAINING 4
VI. SAFETY PRACTICES 5
VII. SAFETY PROCEDURES
5
ul
awair wd4
SAFETY MANUAL
This safety manual has been developed to comply with the •AWAIR ACT'
(A Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction Act) which was passed by
the 1990 Minnesota Legislature (MN Statute, Section 182.653). The
law requires a written workplace accident and injury reduction
program that promotes safe and healthful working conditions and is
based on clearly stated goals and objectives for meeting those
goals. Each unit of the City of Hutchinson (Utilities - Hospital -
Nursing Home) is responsible for maintaining a master manual for its
operation. The Department of Labor and Industry, Occupational Safety
and Health Division (MN OSHA) is the enforcement authority for the
AWAIR ACT, which becomes effective July 1, 1991.
FOREWORD
It is with special concern for the well-being of the employees of the City of
Hutchinson that we proclaim SAFETY as a primary objective in the operation
of the City. This Safety Manual represents policies that have been developed
to protect employees and the general public from harm. Copies shall be kept in
each department of the City. The success of our ongoing safety programs
depends on individual employees. It is continued dedication to safe work
practices and suggestions for future improvements which will make this a such
safer municipal organization. THINK AND WORK safely!
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
1991
-1-
I. SAFETY POLICY STATEMENT
• The City of Hutchinson is committed to the safety of its employees. Both the
City as well as each employee within the organization share the responsibility
of supporting sound safety practices. The City of Hutchinson will continue to
provide a safe working place by:
1. Making available all reasonable safeguards, both personal and
mechanical.
2. Maintaining equipment, tools and machines in good order.
3. Studying and developing safe operating methods.
4. Training employees in the application of safe work practices.
5. Complying with Federal, State and Local Laws regarding safe working
conditions and accident prevention.
Each employee's responsibility is critical in a program like this. Each
employee represents far more than a passive element in the safety program.
Active employee participation in the following areas is a necessary ingredient
for a successful program:
1. Complying with department safety rules.
2. Becoming involved with the City Safety Committee.
3. Spotting and reporting hazards as quickly as possible and alerting
fellow workers to these hazards.
4. Using common sense in all matters of safety.
The combined efforts of both the City and all employees will lend credence to
the philosophy that 'no job at-the City of Hutchinson is really done well
unless it's done safely.'
II. EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITIES
Safety is self - rewarding, therefore, each employee should be the person most
concerned about his /her own safety. In addition, each employee has certain
duties and obligations to the organization. They are:
1. Knowing thejob and always applying safe work practices.
2. Recognizing the hazards of the job and taking precautions to assure
the safety of self and others.
3. Informing the supervisor of hazards and recommending ideas for
elimination of these hazards or improving the condition so work is
made safer.
4. Actively participating and cooperating with the overall Safety
Program.
5. Reporting all injuries immediately; minor first aid injuries as well
as major problems.
6. Recognizing that the ability to work is dependent on good
personal health habits.
It will be the responsibility of all employees to acquire the degree of
knowledge, safe work procedures and standards of performance that are
• necessary to perform their jobs without injury. Assistance and instructions
are constantly available. Employee suggestions for maintaining a safe working
environment are important.
-2-
III. SAFETY COMMITTEE
The Safety Committee representing manaaement and supervisory staff is
designed to represent employees from all work areas possible. A member of the
committee may be appointed Safety Director. All employees are encouraged to
present safety suggestions to the Safety Committee.
It is the function of designated members of the Safety Committee to perform
periodic work area inspections. The Safety Committee as a whole will conduct
regular safety meetings. At these meetings the Safety Committee will review
the following:
1. Mork area inspections.
2. Recent accidents and injuries, both first aid and more serious.
3. Discuss in turn. the safety difficulties in each work area.
4. Review the previous period's safety problems to determine goal dates
or to note completion.
Notes will be kept at the meetings and will be available for all employees
to review.
The Safety Committee will be responsible for reviewing quarterly and annual
reports of the following:
1. Days city wide without lost time.
2. Individual department days without lost time.
3. First aid injury log (look for patterns of accident types).
r 4. Lost time accidents.
INVESTIGATIONS. A subcommittee of the Safety Committee will be responsible
for investigating accidents and employee compliants. These investigations
will be completed within 72 hours of an accident's occurrence or within 10
days of receipt of an employee's complaint.
1. One copy to personnel file of employee(s) involved.
2. One copy to the department involved.
3. One copy attached to City copy of First Report (if one is filed).
A goal date for resolution of the problem should be set upon completion of the
investigation.
IV. SAFETY TALKS
Brief safety talks will be held on a regular basis by departments. They will
consist of presentation of a new idea or problem in that department. Safety
talks are valuable tools in keeping all employees current on matters of
importance and allowing safety matters to be discussed and taken care of when
they cannot wait for the regular safety meeting. Employees are encouraged to
participate and may actually give the meeting if the topic is discussed with
the supervisor beforehand. Because safety, housekeeping, quality and
productivity are all related, these meetings may be used to discuss problems
affecting any one of these areas.
In addition to regular safety talks, there will be City -wide safety meetings
on an annual basis.
a9z
V. NEW EMPLOYEE TRAININS
New employees will be given a thorough training session on the City
philosophy of safety. They will be instructed on the requirements the City
expects of all employees in the area of safety and the guidelines that have
been developed to promote accident prevention. This training may be done
through video presentation.
New employees will be told the necessary personal protective equipment to wear
or purchase as required by OSHA and City policy. Emphasis will be placed on
using this personal protective equipment to prevent employee injury. Special
emphasis should be placed on the fact that safety practices and personal
protective equipment are not debatable or negotiable items.
Supervisors will explain to new employees that it is their obligation to
acquire the necessary safety skills and the proper attitude toward loss
control as sponsored and promoted by the City. Presentations will explain
employees' involvement in department safety meetings and expected
contributions in improving the overall program.
The supervisor in charge of the employee will give the employee a tour of the
work area. The supervisor should point out specific hazards and conditions of
exposure. In the case of maintenance employees, the supervisor will train the
new employee in the specific operations of the job, such as:
1.
What is the function of the equipment?
2.
How does the equipment operate? (Repetition may be necessary here
�-
until the employee learns the operation.)
3.
What is the safest way to operate the equipment? (The safest way may
not always be the easiest or shortest way.)
4.
What are the dangers of the equipment or procedures?
5.
What accidents have occurred on this equipment in the past and how
did they occur? How could they have been prevented?
b.
What is the normal maintenance on this equipment during the course
of normal wear?
7.
What is done in case of an abnormal breakdown? What sound or signal
would indicate a problem?
8.
Preplan your action in case of normal or abnormal breakdown so that
you know exactly what to do.
The supervisor will emphasize to new employees that standards of safe
operating procedures will be enforced. Safety rules are not to be broken.
Until the new employee is thoroughly familiar with the new job, the supervisor
will be in frequent contact to discuss any problems or questions that arise.
:7
—4—
VI. SAFETY PRACTICES
Maintenance employees will follow everyday safety practices: ,
1. Hardhats and safety glasses will be worn by all persons working in
maintenance areas when conditions dictate.
2. Safety vests or orange safety shirts will be worn when working in
traffic areas.
2. Steel -toed work shoes or boots, in good repair, will be worn by
all persons working in maintenance areas.
3. Clothing should be appropriate for the job and temperature of the
work area.
4. Gloves should be worn (when dexterity permits) when the job requires
the handling of sharp, greasy, or ragged edged materials. Gloves
should always be worn when the label on a product requires their use
(chemical solvents).
7. Never carry tools or sharp objects in pockets, where they may cause
injury if you forget that they are there.
9. NEVER smoke, eat or drink with any type of chemical residue left on
your hands. Thif includes paints, solvents, degreasers, and any
other shop chemical.
VII. SAFETY PROCEDURES
The employer and employee may review safety procedures and rules during their
regular safety talks. Where appropriate, the department heads may post
specific department safety rules.
ttfftttt
-3-
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 23, 1992
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Doug Meier
SUBJECT: REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTIZE FOR BIDS FOR THE
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT AS INDICATED BELOW:
MOTOR POOL
1 - Motor Grader
STREET DEPARTMENT
. 1 - Asphalt Compactor, Dual Drum
1 - Router
1 - Material Melter Applicator
Equipment indicated here was approved for purchase in the 1992
budget.
�1
1w,
•
9 R V
I/ As you are further aware, this position
1992 budget. Also, attached hereto is a
t lthough the personnel coordinator has no
far as a pay grade I would recommend at
20 his position. The current dispatch pay
J�
HEHORANDUH
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
FROH: Steve Madson, Chief of Police
DATE: January 23, 1992
RE: Dispatch Supervisor
During the budget preparation period for the 1992 city budget I
incorporated several specific ideas and goals for the police
department. One of these goals was to develop the position of
dispatch supervisor. As you are aware, in the past a sergeant has
been assigned to supervise the dispatch center. With a sergeant
working a revolving shift it has been very difficult to develop a
congruent supervision style which affords daily contact with the
communications center. Additionally, the sergeants are not well
versed in the interworkings of the communications area and computer
systems which leaves a void in the decision making process when
questions arise regarding an operational type of question.
Therefore, it would be extremely advantageous to develop this
position and to implement it as soon as possible since the city of
Hutchinson will continue to provide a communications center within
the community.
I would request that you r eview t
on the agenda for the January 28,
city council approval.
was budgeted for in the
sample job description.
t evaluated this position
least of pay grade 8 for
grade is a pay grade 7.
and also place it
sncil meetin r
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum,
please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.
/lkg
92 -02 -0003
DICTATED BUT NOT READ
I i- y - �, �---
Gar
y - I would agree that a dispatch supervisor would be a Pay Grade VIII
when supervising Grade VII dispatchers.
0 Hazel
?-M
Policy
The position of dispatch supervisor will supervise all full and
part time dispatch personnel within the police department. Also,
the dispatch supervisor will provide clerical and administrative
support to the police department. This position comes under the
authority of the Chief of Police.
Duties and Responsibilities
1. Supervise and develop dispatchers to assure effective and
consistent communication between the community and its
emergency services.
2. Maintain a work schedule for the dispatch section to.assure
adequate coverage at all times.
3. Evaluate performance of dispatch personnel and as a result may
provide guidance for correction or training, may take
disciplinary action and may make recommendations for promotion
and transfer.
•
4. Instruct dispatchers in correct procedure for data entry into
the police department computer systems and the criminal
justice recording system.
5. Monitor daily occurrence reports to ensure consistency and
accuracy in reporting.
6. Keep Chief of Police informed of any pertinent happenings as
they occur.
7. Perform other duties and assume other responsibility as
apparent or as assigned.
Equipment
A dispatch supervisor shall be knowledgeable and /or qualified to
operate the radio console, computerized communication system,
telephones, teletypewriter, typewriter, tape recorder, copy
machine.
Qualifications
A dispatch supervisor shall have a high school education plus two
(2) years full time or five (5) years part time dispatching
experience. Ability to perform keyboard and record keeping
functions with a high degree of accuracy, excellent communications
skills, ability to respond in a calm manner in emergency situations
and to obtain complete information under stress, ability to perform
duties with distractions in crowded conditions, respect for
confidentiality. 0
• Working Conditions
The dispatch supervisors working condition is full time, normally
daytime hours, with some flexibility as needed to ensure adequate
dispatch coverage. Should be able to fill some shifts on dispatch
schedule to cover vacation and compensation days.
DAVID B. ARNOLD
GARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K.FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOGEMANN
P61'L D. DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
RICHARD O. MCGEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI
MARY E. HORROCKS
CATHRYN D. HEHER
•
January 9, 1992
OF COUMSEL
WILLIAM W. CAMERON
RAYMOND C. I-ALLIER
PAUL M. BEGICH
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL"
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
NEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 345-9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
FAX (612) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389-2214
FAX (612) 389 -5506
City Administrator % 1 �-, (9
37 Washington Avenue West Z P �
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350 41 1
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
H UTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350-
(612) 587 -7575 ^
FAX (612) 587 -4096 '
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
Q�
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
o• i
Re: Transient Merchant Ordinance f
Our File No. 3188 -87031
oe e\
Dear Gary:
Enclosed please find a proposed Ordinance dealing with
of the City's transient merchant ordinance.
1 992 N
C4.a 1 y
By N l
k--1$ L2�
the subject
I have reviewed our ordinance in detail and I have compared it to
similar ordinances in other jurisdictions.
I have made the following changes for the following reasons:
1. I have deleted the language that allows an otherwise transient
merchant to be relieved from complying with the provisions of
this Section by associating temporarily with any local dealer,
trader, merchant, auctioneer or organization. Most of the
other ordinances that I have studied do not include this
language. My concern is that this language is an exception
which swallows the entire rule; any transient merchant may
simply avoid the restrictions of the ordinance by arranging
for the sale of goods from private property. Presumably an
transient merchant is probably going to have such an
arrangement since, under the ordinance, transient merchants
may not sell in the public right -of -way. It would be my
opinion that temporary sale locations, organized and
established by already existing businesses ( e.g. - , the ShopKo
garden products tent or a Cashwise sponsored outdoor produce
sale) are exempted from this definition because they are not
engaged in the " temporary business of selling and delivering
goods."
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION r
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION - ..a n/
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
January 9, 1992
Page 2
•
2. I have provided in the ordinance for the regulation of the
sale of agricultural products and I have also included a
provision allowing the City Council to exempt such products
from licensing if sold at a duly organized and authorized
farmer's market. This might have the effect of encouraging
participation in a farmer's market arrangement although, of
course, that is a secondary and incidental issue with respect
to this ordinance. Please note that the City Council retains
the right under the present ordinance to set licensing fees
and I believe the City Council has set lower rates for the
sale of agricultural produce. While we are discussing the
subject of agricultural produce, I believe there are two
additional points worth considering. First, the City Council
could choose, if it so desires, to exempt farmers and truck
gardeners totally from the ordinance, but if the Council
chooses to do so, it should include the qualifier that only
farmers or truck gardeners selling their own merchandise are
so exempted. A second, a related point, is that the language
as presently drafted and presented to the City Council, does
require shrimp vendors to register.
3. I have revised the language dealing with streets to make it
clear that the City is not granting any rights to the use of
public streets or public right -of -way and also giving
discretion to a police officer to act immediately to clear a
congested area, if necessary.
4. I would recommend that at the time the license is issued the
following language be added to the license or set forth on a
separate document:
"I have received a copy of Section 6.22 of the
Hutchinson City Code and I agree to abide by
all of the terms and conditions set forth
therein, as well as the terms and conditions
of all other applicable state and local laws
and ordinances. I understand that under
Hutchinson City Code Chapter 1 and Section
2.99, violations of Hutchinson City Ordinances
are misdemeanors."
My reason for including this language is that many of these
transient merchants may have absolutely no contact or
connection with the community and while it is no defense to
a violation of our local ordinance, the use of this language
will eliminate the whining that sometimes accompanies attempts
•
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
January 9, 1992
Page 3
to enforce the local ordinance.
•
5. Some communities are requiring bonds of peddlers and transient
merchants. I do not favor a bond requirement at the present
time, at least in the absence of any proven abuse. The
problem with a bond requirement is that it really needs to be
enforced uniformally and the City probably has many transient
merchants with which it has no or very little problem. This
is an option to keep in mind for the future.
For the Council's information, I am enclosing a copy of Section
6.22 as it now appears so that they can compare the ordinance in
its entirety with the proposed changes.
You might be interested to know that the
also adopted a statute dealing with the
merchants and that statute is found
Municipalities are specifically authorized
merchants under Minnesota Statute §329.15.
Thank you.
Very ily yoArs,
G. Wiv And6rson
GBA:Ilm
Enclosure
State of Minnesota has
subject of transient
at Section 329.099.
to regulate transient
0
Ll
ORDINANCE NO. 91- 2ND SERIES
PUBLICATION NO. '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
CITY CODE SECTION 6.22 DEALING
TRANSIENT MERCHANTS AND ADOPTING
AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG
PROVISIONS.
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING
WITH PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS AND
BY REFERENCE CITY CODE CHAPTER 1
OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
•
•
Section 1. City Code Section 6.22, Subd. 1, paragraph (c) is
hereby amended as follows:
C. "Transient Merchant" includes any person, firm
or corporation, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee
whether a resident of the City or not, who engages in a temporary
business of selling and delivering goods, wares and merchandise
within the City, and who, in furtherance of such purpose, hires,
leases, uses or occupies any building, structure, motor vehicle,
lodging house, apartments, shops, or any street, alley or other
place within the City, for the exhibition and sale of such goods,
wares and merchandise, either privately or at public auction_
previded that Such definition does not include any person who,
while occupying such temporary location, does not sell from stock,
but exhibits samples for the purpose of securing orders for future
delivery only. The- }verse -se engaged is relies
temporarily with any e eel ^deale ,, trad L. I eL l eer e "
dealer W- -41, as a part ef, er in the name ef any leeal I
. The sale of farm or garden
Products, whether or not sold by the person producing the same,
shall be included within the definition set forth above provided,
however, that the City Council may exempt such farm and garden
products from the ordinance as are sold at a duly organized and
authorized farmer's market.
Section 2. City Code Section 6.22, Subd. 8 "Use of Streets"
is hereby amended as follows:
Subd. 8. Use of Streets. No licensee shall have nay
exclusive right to any location in the public streets, nor shall
any be permitted a stationary location in the public
streets or public right -of -way nor shall any be permitted to
operate in a congested area where such operation might impede or
inconvenience the public use of such streets. For the purpose of
this Section, the judgment of a police officer, exercised in good
faith, shall be deemed conclusive as to whether the area is
congested and the public impeded or inconvenienced.
Section 3. City Code, Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
9-N
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference,
as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption
and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this day of January, 1992.
Paul L. Ackland, Mayor
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
First reading: January 14, 1992
Second reading: January 28, 1992
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on:
is
•
§ 6.20
C. Any performance or event in, or sponsored by,
the McLeod County Agricultural Association, bona fide local church
and non - profit organizations, provided that such organization shall
be incorporated.
D. Any performance or event in, or sponsored by,
the City and the City Recreation Department.
SEC. 6.21. TOBACCO
Subd. 1. Definition. As used in this SEction, the term
"tobacco" means and includes tobacco in any form, including but not
limited to, cigarettes, cigars, bagged, canned or packaged product.
Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any
person, directly or indirectly, to keep for retail sale, sell at
retail, or otherwise dispose of any tobacco in any form unless a
license therefor shall first be obtained from the City.
Subd. 3. Restrictions.
A. Separate licenses shall be issued for the sale
of tobacco at each fixed place of business, and no license shall
be issued for a movable place of business.
B. It is unlawful for any person to sell or give
away any tobacco in any form to any person under the age of
eighteen (18) years.
Subd. 4. Prohibition of Sale of Tobacco Products by
Vending Machines or Other Mechanical Means.
A. No license shall be issued for a tobacco
products vending machine located in a business, accommodation,
refreshment, entertainment, recreation or transportation facility
of any kind, whether licensed or not, whose goods, services,
facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations are extended,
offered, sold or otherwise made available to the public. This
prohibition shall not extend to lunchroom facilities available only
to employees of a business and where said lunchroom facilities are
not normally available to persons under the age of 18 years.
B. For purposes of this section, the term tobacco
products shall mean cigarettes, cigars, other smoking tobacco,
snuff, chewing tobacco or any other kind of tobacco prepared in
such manner so as to be suitable for chewing or smoking.
Source: Ordinance No. 89 -14
Effective: 6 -1 -90
SEC. 6.22. PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS.
• Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in
this Section, shall have the meanings stated:
131 (7- 16 -90)
�_W
§ 6.22
A. "Peddler" means any person, whether a resident
of the City or not, who goes from house to house, from place to
place, or from street to street, conveying or transporting goods,
wares or merchandise or offering or exposing the same for sale or
making sales and delivering articles to purchasers. It does not
include vendors who distribute products to regular customers on
regular established routes.
B. "Solicitor" means any person, whether a resident
of the City or not, who goes from house to house, from place to
place, or from street to street, in person or by telephone,
soliciting or taking or attempting to take orders for sale of
goods, wares or merchandise, including magazines, books,
periodicals, or personal property of any nature whatsoever for
future delivery, or for service to be performed in the future,
whether or not such individual has, carries or exposes for sale a
sample of the subject of such order or whether or not he is
collecting advance payments on such orders. Such definition
includes any person who, for himself, or for another person, firm
or corporation, hires, leases, uses or occupies any building, motor
vehicle, trailer, structure, tent, railroad box car, boat, hotel
room, lodging house, apartment, shop, or other place within the
City for the primary purpose of exhibiting samples and taking
orders for future delivery. It does not include vendors who
distribute products to or take orders from regular customers on
regular established routes or display products or take orders at
invited in -home demonstrations.
C. "Transient Merchant" includes any person, firm •
or corporation, whether as owner, agent, consignee, or employee
whether a resident of the City or not, who engages in a temporary
business of selling and delivering goods, wares and merchandise
within the City, and who, in furtherance of such purpose, hires,
leases, uses or occupies any building, structure, motor vehicle,
lodging houses, apartments, shops, or any street, alley or other
place within the City, for the exhibition and sale of such goods,
wares and merc andise, either privately or at public auction-;
uch definition does not include any person who,
while occupying temporary location, does not sell from stock,F
but exhibits samples for the purpose of securing orders for future
delivery only. -The person so engaged is relieved from complying
with the provisions of this Section merely by reason of associating
temporarily with any local dealer, trader, merchant, auctioneer or
organization or by conducting such transient business in connection
with, as a part of, or in the name of any local dealer, trader,
merchant, auctioneer or organization.
Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any
peddler, solicitor or transient merchant to engage in any business
within the City without first obtaining a license therefor from the
City.
Subd. 3. Exemptions. This Section does not include the
acts of persons selling personal property at wholesale to dealers
in such articles, nor to newsboys, nor to the acts of merchants or
' their employees in delivery goods in the regular course of
business. Nor shall the provisions of this Section be applied to
the acts of persons selling or displaying personal property, goods
or wares to merchants or their employees for use in said merchant's
132 (7- 16 -90)
S 6.22
business or sale upon consignment by said merchant. Nothing
contained in this Section prohibits any sale required by statute or
by order of any court, or prevents any person conducting a bona
fide auction sale pursuant to law.
Subd. 4. Application. Applicants for a license under
this Section shall file with 'the City Administrator a sworn
application in writing on a form to be furnished by the City
Administrator. The application shall give the following
information:
A. Name and physical description of applicant;
B. Complete permanent home and local address of the
applicant and, in the case of transient merchants, the local
address from which proposed sales will be made;
C. A brief description of the nature of the
business and the goods to be sold;
D. The name and address of the employer, principal
or supplier of the applicant, together with credentials therefrom
establishing the exact relationship;
i E. The length of time for which the right to do
business is desired;
F. The source of supply of the goods or property
proposed to be sold, or orders taken for the sale thereof, where
such goods or products are located at the time said application is
filed, and the proposed method of delivery;
G. A recent photograph of the applicant which
picture shall be approximately 2" by 2" showing the head and
shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distinguishing manner;
H. The names of at least two property owners of
McLeod County, Minnesota, who will certify as to the applicant's
good character and business respectability, or, in lieu of.the
names of references, such other available evidence as to the good
character and business responsibility of the applicant as will
enable an investigator to properly evaluate such character and
business responsibility;
I. A statement as to whether or not the applicant
has been convicted of any crime, misdemeanor, or violation of any
City Code provision, other than traffic violations, the nature of
the offense and the punishment or penalty assessed therefor;
133 (7 -1 -89)
S 6.22 9
J. The last municipalities, not to exceed three,
where applicant carried on business immediately preceding date of
application and the addresses from which such business was
conducted in those municipalities;
K. At the time of filing the application, a
license /investigation fee adopted by resolution of the Council
shall be paid to the City Administrator to cover the cost of
investigation of the facts stated therein.
Subd. 5. Religious and Charitable Organizations,
Exemption. The provisions of this Section shall not apply to any
organization, society, association or corporation desiring to
solicit or have solicited in its name money, donations of money or
property, or financial assistance of any kind or desiring to sell
or distribute any item of literature or merchandise for which a fee
is charged or solicited from persons other than members of such
organizations upon the streets, in office or business buildings, by
house to house canvass, or in public places for a charitable;
religious, patriotic or philanthropic purpose.
Subd. 6. Investigation and Issuance.
A. Upon receipt of each application, it shall be
referred to the Chief of Police, who shall immediately institute
such investigation of the applicant's business and moral character
as he deems necessary for the protection of the public good and
shall endorse the application in the manner prescribed in this
Section within seven (7) days after it has been filed by the
applicant with the City Administrator.
C. If the Council shall reject such application,
the City Administrator shall notify the applicant that his
application is disapproved and that no license will be issued. If
the Council shall approve such application, the City Administrator
shall deliver to the applicant his license. Such license shall
contain the signature of the issuing officer and shall show the
name and address of said licensee, the class of license issued and
the kinds of goods to be sold thereunder, the date of issuance and
the length of time, not to exceed one year from the date of
issuance that the same shall be operative, as well as the license
134 (7 -1 -89)
B.
As a
result of such investigation the Chief of
Police shall
endorse
his approval or disapproval on such
application
and
his
reasons for the same, and return the
application to
the
City
Administrator who shall place the license
before the Council
for
its consideration for rejection or issuance
within thirty
(30)
days
from the date of the application.
C. If the Council shall reject such application,
the City Administrator shall notify the applicant that his
application is disapproved and that no license will be issued. If
the Council shall approve such application, the City Administrator
shall deliver to the applicant his license. Such license shall
contain the signature of the issuing officer and shall show the
name and address of said licensee, the class of license issued and
the kinds of goods to be sold thereunder, the date of issuance and
the length of time, not to exceed one year from the date of
issuance that the same shall be operative, as well as the license
134 (7 -1 -89)
S 6.22
number. Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must secure
a personal license. No license shall be used at any time by any
person other than the one to whom it is issued. The City
Administrator shall keep a permanent record of all licenses issued.
Subd. 7. Loud Noises and Speaking Devices. No licensee,
nor any person in his behalf, shall shout, cry out, blow a horn,
ring a bell, or use any sound amplifying device upon any of the
streets, alleys, parks or other public places of the City or upon
private premises where sound of sufficient volume is emitted or
produced therefrom to be capable of being plainly heard upon the
streets, avenues, alleys, parks, or other public places, for the
purpose of attracting attention to any goods, wares or merchandise
which such licensee.proposes to sell.
Subd. B. Use of Streets. No licensee shall have any
exclusive right to any location in the public streets, nor shall
any be permitted a stationary location thereon, nor shall any be
permitted to operate in a congested area where such operation might
impede or inconvenience the public use of such streets. For the
purpose of this Section, the judgment of a police officer,
exercised in good faith, shall be deemed conclusive as to whether
the area is congested and the public impeded or inconvenienced.
Subd. 9. Exhibition of License. Licensees are required
to exhibit their license at the request of any citizen.
Subd. 10. Duty of Police to Enforce. It shall be the
duty of the police to require any person seen peddling, soliciting
or canvassing and who is not known by such officer to have obtained
a license hereunder to produce his license and to enforce the
provisions of this Section against any person found to be violating
the same.
Subd. 11. Records. The Chief of Police shall report to
the City Administrator all convictions for violation of this
Section and the City Administrator shall maintain a record for each
license issued and record the reports of violation therein.
Subd. 12. Revocation of License.
A. Licenses issued under the provisions of this
Section may be revoked by the Council after notice and hearing, for
any of the following causes:
1. Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect
statement contained in the application for license;
135 (7 -1 -89)
S 6.22 0
2. Fraud, misrepresentation or incorrect
statement made in the course of carrying on his business as
solicitor, canvasser, peddler, transient merchant, itinerant
merchant or itinerant vendor;
3. Any violation of this Section;
4. Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor;
S. Conducting the business of peddler,
canvasser, solicitor, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or
itinerant vendor, as the case may be, in an unlawful manner or 'in
such a manner as to constitute a breach of peace or to constitute a
menace to health, safety or general welfare of the public.
B. Notice of the hearing for revocation of a
license shall be given by the City Administrator in writing,
setting forth specifically the grounds of complaint and the time
and place of hearing. Such notice shall be mailed, postage
prepaid, to the licensee at his last known address at least five
(5) days prior to the date set for hearing, or shall be delivered
by a police officer in the same manner as a summons at least three
(3) days prior to the date set for hearing.
Subd. 13. Reapplication. No licensee whose license has
been revoked shall make further application until at least six (6)
months have elapsed since the last previous revocation.
Subd. 14. Expiration of License. All annual licenses
issued under the provisions of this Section shall expire at
midnight the 31st day of December in the year when issued. Other
than annual licenses shall expire at midnight on the date specified
in the license.
SEC. 6.23. GARBAGE AND REFUSE HAULERS.
Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in
this Section, shall have the meanings stated:
A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes,
including animal offal, and carcasses of dead animals but excluding
human excreta, sewage and other water - carried wastes.
B. "Other refuse" means ashes, crockery, boxes,
rags and similar non - putrescible wastes but excluding glass, cans,
paper and other recyclable materials, sand, earth, brick, stone,
concrete, trees, tree branches and wood and construction materials.
136 (7 -1 -89)
0
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 22, 1992
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FRO14: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
#464 - CITY OF HUTCHINSON
After discussion and clarification of concerns and comments
requested by Mr. Don Glas, Pres. Firstate Federal, and Mr. John
Bernhagen, HCDC, the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the
final draft of the Zoning Ordinance with attached revisions.
Bonnie will correct grammatical errors before the final adopted
printing.
Citrl Hall Parks & Recreation
37 1V17S11ington Az•enne I1'est 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- T' - ; : :f , •I 1 iII * -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street Soutar
(612) 587-2242
/ v
•
COMMENTS ON FINAL DRAFT OF ZONING ORDINANCE - John Bernhagen
Section 4 - Non - Conforming Lots - Should this section follow the
General Provision? (Maybe after the present Section 7 ?)
4.05 - Repairs and Maintenance - Could this 10% limitation lead to
un- needed disrepair? Can you do 10% this 12 months and another 10%
next 12 months and so on? Maybe the limit could be tied to some
master plan or time table for the eventual discontinuance of the
non - conforming use.
6.04 - Again, it seems general provisions should come first and
then exceptions.
6.07, c., 2. - Floodway and Flood Fringe District - Does the Corps
of Engineers need to be notified?
7.10 - Yard Space Encroachments - (c) does not make sense.
7.14 - b & c together would allow for an unsitely building 16x62.5
rather than say 20x50 or 25x40. (Jim has addressed this and it has
been corrected on the master copy of the draft.)
8.01 - What if land were to come into city next to industrial zoned
land say on east side of Hutchinson, would it take six months for
just the report time to expire before any word could be given if a
proposed industry wanted to located in Hutchinson? (See paragraph
that starts with the words "all territories... ")
8.03 - (2) - May shut out 1st time home buyers. 24x36 =864 standard
size. 960 x 42 = 40,320 + 15,000 for lot = 55,320 500 /month
payment = $24,000/yr gross income. Too HIGH a sq. footage.
8.03, (4) - second "of" I think should be "or ".
8.03, (5) - Deals with manufactured homes. It should not be buried
but have its own Manufactured Home sub - heading.
8.04 (7) - Does this exclude a maid or grounds keeper?
8.04 page 8 -7 - Under Accessory Uses - Swimming pools - exclusive
use of occupants of the principal.
1. Principal what?
2. Exclusive ? Could I invite my friends or could they only
look over the fences?
8.11 - Under purpose should read by adding "Central " after C -3?
8.12 - c,4, - Dimensional Requirements - Why 25 ft. Street Right of
Way for building setback. Is 25 enough, others are 30 ft.
Where would a
grain
storage or grain elevator be
located.
the
concern in the
height
restriction under I -C, I -1,
and I -2.
q
Tanuary 21, 1992
fIRSTATE
FEDERp►L
Planning Commission & Council Members
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN 55350
RE: Final Draft - City of Hutchinson Zoning Ordinance
Dear Planning & Council Members:
it' L
31ry f '
t Sti� 2 � `J
In reviewing the proposed zoning ordinance changes, I noted in Section 8.03, Subsection 2,
(Rules for Structures in Districts), that "principal structures shall have at least 960 square
feet of habitable interior room, excluding garage and basement."
This square foot limitation would appear to have a negative effect by limiting the
affordability of new construction to very low -, low- and moderate - income individuals as
defined under the Affordable Housing Section of the Financial Institutions Reform
Recovery and Enforcement Act. It would also have an effect on young families, elderly
individuals whose families have left the household, as well as single individuals.
Affordable Housing should continue to be a concern for all communities. First State
Federal Savings and Loan Association, as mandated by Community Reinvestment
Regulations, offers programs for very low -, low -, and moderate - income people. Structure
requirements of this size would place an added burden on these programs.
I am not familiar with the rationale used in determining the 960 square foot figure, and I
would be interested in knowing how this was determined. I encourage consideration for a
lower threshold while it continues to be under the control of the City of Hutchinson.
Your consideration regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. I shall await your
response.
Best regards,
'ald A. G1
ident /CE
ah
W
•
•
HUTCHINSON MA:N HUTCHINSOON SOUTH
LITCHFIELD
BUFFALO
GLENCOE WACONIA WINTHROF
:� 9C5 ^v a•. ' " ;;;�Ih
9
50' v S,bi,iy A,e %e
' 9 Central Avenue
'002 Gree ev Aver 0 c 2 c _
�•e 0 stage Ra Hwy 5 _a_; : � St
5d °G 31'7
P C _:x ;: ?
� Eox
Y' _ .ot 2
•
•
8.0 ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP
8.01 Establishment of Zoning Districts and
Provisions for Official Zoning Map
8.02 Rules for Interpretation of District
Boundaries
8.03 Rules for Structures in Districts
8.04 R -1 Single Family Residence District
8.05 R -2 Medium Density Residential District
8.06 R -3 Medium -High Density Residential
District
8.07 R -4 High- Density Residential District
8.08 R -5 Mobile Home Park
8.09 C -1 Neighborhood Convenience Commercial
District
8.10 C -2 Automotive Service Commerical
District
8.11 C -3 Central Commercial District
8.12 C -4 Fringe Commercial District
8.13 I/C Industrial /Commercial District
8.14 I -1 Light Industrial Park District
8.15 I -2 Heavy Industry District
8.16 Business Park District
8.17 P.D. Planned Development District
8.18 Flood Plain Management
8.19 Special Protection Districts
9.0 SUMMARY OF DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
10.0 SPECIAL
10.01
10.02
10.03
10.04
10.05
10.06
10.07
10.08
10.09
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
PROVISIONS
Site Plan Reviews for Multiple
Family Housing, Commercial,
Industrial or Mobile Home Park
Developments
Off - Street Parking and Loading
Facilities
Schedule of Off - Street Parking
Requirements
Bed and Breakfast Establishments
Service Station and Car Wash
Regulations
Filling or Removal of Soil, Sand
or Other Materials
Fences and Walls
Television and Radio Antennas
Swimming Pools
Relocating Structures;
Storage or Transfer of
Liquid
Pole Barns
Performance Standards
Signs
House Moving
Flammable
11.0 APPENDIX
A. Shoreland Ordinance
8 -1
8 -1
8 -2
8 -3
8 -5
8 -9
8 -12
8 -15
8 -19
'8 -23
8 -25
8 -28
8 -30
8 -33
8 -37
8 -40
8 -43
8 -45
8 -51
9 -1
10 -1
10 -1
10 -2
10 -5
10 -7
10 -7
10 -11
10 -11
10 -12
10 -13
10 -14
10 -14
10 -14
10 -14
10 -17
Section 4
Non - Conforming Uses
C. Should such structure be moved for any reason for any distance
whatsoever, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for
the district in which it is located after it is moved.
D. When a non - conforming use of a structure, or structure and
premises in combination, is discontinued or abandoned for six
consecutive months or for eighteen months during any
three -year period, the structure, or structure and premises in
combination, shall not thereafter be used except in
conformance with the regulations of the district in which it
is located.
E. When a non - conforming use status applies to a structure and
premises in combination, removal or destruction of the
structure shall eliminate the non - conforming status of the
land.
F. If any non - conforming structure in the Floodway or Flood
Fringe District is destroyed by any means, including floods,
to an extent of fifty percent or more of its appraised value
at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except
in conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance. However,
the City Planning Commission may issue a Conditional Use
Permit for reconstruction if the use is located outside the
floodway and, upon reconstruction, is adequately floodproofed,
elevated, or otherwise protected in conformity with Section
8.18.
G. An alteration or addition to any non - conforming structure
located only in the Flood Plain which would result in
substantially increasing its damage potential shall be
protected in accordance with Section 8.18.
4.05 REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE
On any building devoted in whole or in part to any non- conforming
use, work may be done in any period of twelve consecutive months on
ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of non - bearing walls,
fixtures, wiring or plumbing, to an extent not exceeding ten
percent of the current market value of the building, as established
by the City Assessor, provided that the cubic space content of the
building as it existed at the time of passage or amendment of this
Ordinance shall not be increased. The work done in any 5 year
period may not exceed 20% of the market value of the building.
Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to prevent the
strengthening or restoring to a safe condition of any building or
part thereof declared to be unsafe by any City official charged
with protecting the public safety, upon order of such official or
the reconditioning required by updated building codes, fire codes
or energy codes.
4 -3
O
Section 7
General Provisions
intersecting streets or around the circumference of a cul -de -sac is
developed with buildings that have a front yard that is greater or
less than the required front yard in the district, no building
shall project beyond the average yard so established.
7.08 YARD SPACE, GENERAL
Any building, structure or use hereafter erected altered or
established shall comply with the yard space requirements of the
district in which it is located, except as specified below. The
required yard space for any building, structure, or use shall be
contained on the same lot as the building, structure or use and
such required yard space shall fall entirely upon land in a
district or districts in which the principal use is permitted. Any
required yard space shall be open from thirty inches above the
ground to the sky except as specified elsewhere in this Ordinance.
7.09 PLACEMENT OF SINGLE - AND TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES
ON LARGE LOTS
In any Residence District where a single- or two - family residential
structure is to be developed on large lots which could later be
resubdivided and still meet the dimensional and area requirements
for another lot of the district in which it is situated, such
structure must be placed in a manner which would permit such
resubdivision. Accessory uses shall be exempted from this
requirement.
7.10 YARD SPACE ENCROACHMENTS - PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS:
The following projections may be permitted into any front, rear or
exterior side yard adjoining a street lot line.
A. Cornices, sills, eaves and other ornamental features to a
distance of not more than two feet six inches.
B. Fire escapes to a distance of not more than four feet six
inches.
C. Decks, in Residence Districts, to a distance of not more than
one -half the distance into yards. No easement encroachments
permitted.
D. Bay windows and chimneys and fireplaces to a distance of not
more than three feet, provided that such features do not
occupy, in the aggregate, more than one -third the length of the
building wall on which they are located.
E. Retaining walls and landscaping timbers within easements by
conditional use permit.
7.11 YARD SPACE EXCEPTION, STEEP SLOPES:
In any Residence Districts where the natural grade of a lot within
the required front yard has an average slope, normal to the front
7 -3
Section 7
General Provisions
the required front yard has an average slope, normal to the front
lot line at every point along said line, of such a degree or
percent of slope that it is not practicable to provide a driveway
with a grade of twelve percent or less to a private garage
conforming to the requirements of this Ordinance, such garage may
be located within such front yard, but not in any case closer than
twelve feet to the street line.
7.12 MORE THAN ONE PRINCIPAL BUILDING ON A LOT:
Not more than one principal building shall be located on a lot in
Residence Districts R -1 and R -2 except as provided in Section 8.
7.13 HOUSING PROJECTS UTILIZING THE "ZERO LOT LINE" CONCEPT:
Every development proposal which is designed or later modified so
as to place the principal structure abutting a side property line
in order to have only one open side yard or less, must file with
the Zoning Administrator a signed copy of the recorded Covenant
with filing information assuring access through the adjacent yard
for purposes of repairs and general maintenance and /or common wall
construction. Such covenant is mandatory and the issuance of any
Certificate of Occupancy shall be contingent on the filing. In
some cases, the side yard could be the rear yard.
7.14 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS:
A. No accessory buildings shall be erected or located within any
required side yard setback. Except as provided in Section 8.04
and 8.05 for R -1 and R -2 Districts.
B. Utility buildings in Residential Districts shall not exceed 12
x 16 feet and shall be 6 feet or more from all lot lines of
adjoining lots, and shall not be located within a utility
easement.
C. No accessory building or garage per single family homes shall
occupy more than 25 percent of a rear yard, nor exceed 1,000
square feet of floor area. Garages which exceed the aforesaid
maximum may be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit.
D. No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one
accessory detached private garage structure for each dwelling.
E. No accessory building or use shall be constructed or developed
on a lot prior to the time of construction of the principal
building to which it is accessory, except by Conditional Use
Permit.
F. Accessory buildings in all Districts shall be located to the
rear of the principal building.
G. No accessory building in a Commercial or Industry District
shall exceed the height of the principal building except by
Conditional Use Permit.
7 -4
SECTION 8: ZONING DISTRICTS AND ZONING MAP
8.01 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS AND PROVISIONS FOR
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
For the purposes of this Ordinance, the City is hereby divided into
districts, as shown. on the Official Zoning Map, which, together
with all explanatory matter thereof, is hereby adopted by reference
and declared to be part of this Ordinance. Said districts shall be
known as:
R -1
R -2
R -3
R -4
R -5
C -1
C -2
C -3
C -4
I -1
I -2
I/C
BP
PD
FW
FF
Low - Density Residential District
Medium Density Residential District
Medium -High Density Residential District
High Density Residential District
Mobile Home Park District
Neighborhood Convenience Commercial District
Automotive Service Commercial District
Central Commercial District
Fringe Commercial District
Light Industrial Park District
Heavy Industrial Park District
Industrial /Commercial District
Business Park District
Planned Development District
Floodway District
Flood Fringe District
The Official Zoning Map shall be identified by the signature of the
Mayor, attested to by the Clerk and bearing the seal of the City
under the following words: "This is to certify that this is the
Official Zoning Map referred to in Section 8 of Ordinance Number
464 of the City of Hutchinson," together with the date of adoption
of this Ordinance. The Zoning Ordinance and Official Zoning Map
shall be kept on file in the office of the Zoning Administrator.
Any unauthorized change of the Official Zoning Map of whatever kind
by person or persons shall be considered a violation of this
Ordinance.
All territories which may hereafter be annexed to the City of
Hutchinson shall be considered as being in the R -1, Low Density
Residential District, until an amendment to this Ordinance shall
place annexed land in a different zoning district. The Planning
Commission shall review the zoning classification of any annexed
land and shall report thereon to the City Council giving their
recommendations as to the proper classification.
Whenever any street, alley or other public way is vacated by
official action of the City Council, the zoning district adjoining
each side of such street, alley or public way shall be
automatically extended to the center of such vacation and all area
included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to
all appropriate regulations of the extended districts.
8 -1
Section '8
Zoning Districts and Zoning Map
8.03 RULES FOR STRUCTURES IN DISTRICTS
For all principal structures permitted in the R -1, R -2, R -3, R -4
Districts, the following shall apply:
(1) The minimum width of the main porticn of all principal
dwellings shall be not less than twenty -four (24) feet, as
measured across the narrowest portion. Width measurement
shall not take into account overhang or other projections.
(2) Shall have at least 720 square feet of habitable interior
room excluding garage and basement.
(3) All principal dwellings and principal structures shall be
placed on a permanent foundation in compliance with the
Uniform Building Code as adopted by the City and insulated
in accordance with State of Minnesota Energy Codes.
Manufactured homes must provide the manufacturers approved
foundation drawings. Homes manufactured after November 29,
1989, are not permitted to remove the frames unless approved
by the State of Minnesota Manufactured Housing Division.
(4) Shall have a roof of gable or hip design and be covered with
a City approved roofing material.
(5) Manufactured homes shall be constructed after June 15, 1976,
and bear the H.U.D. certification seal.
(6) Tongues on all manufactured homes shall be removed. Written
approval to remove the frame and tongue from the
manufacturer is required.
(7) Data plate and other information for the following is
required for manufactured homes.
a) 30 pound roof load design
b) Zone 2 heating design
c) Adequate furnace and water heater design to include the
substructure. Option - separate heating supply for
substructure.
d) Approved tap -in locations for substructure water service.
e) 3 vent through roof location for substructure per State of
Minnesota Health Department
f) Electric interlocked smoke detector schematic
g) Manufacturers design drawings for stairway location
(8) The following alterations of manufactured homes requires
manufacturers approval and State of Minnesota Manufactured
Housing Division approval:
a) Relocation of furnace and /or water heater
b) Alteration of any structural components including roof,
walls and floor system, attaching garages, etc.
•
•
8 -3
Section 8.04
R -1 District
Any structure, including accessory structures, for which a
moving permit is requested except any building not exceeding 10
feet in width or 12 feet in length and not being over 10 feet
in height, which are exempt from moving permits but require a
building permit.
ACCESSORY USES
Detached garages not exceeding 1,000 square feet.
Utility sheds not exceeding 192 square feet.
Gazebo or summer lawn- house; yard recreational equipment
Signs, as regulated in Section 10
Swimming pools or game courts designed for private use.
•
DIMENSIONAL REGULATIONS
(1) Required Lot Area:
Use
Minimum Lot Area
Single - family
10,400 square feet
residence connected to
Depth
public sanitary sewer.
80
(2) Required Lot Dimensions (feet):
Use
Minimum Lot
Minimum Lot
Width
Depth
Single - family
80
130
residence connected
Corner lot:
to public sanitary
110
sewer.
at building
line
8 -7
Section 8.10
C -3 District
8.11 C -3 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The C -3 Central Commercial District is intended to provide an area
for the grouping of general retail sales establishments, offices
and services which serve City residents and the surrounding area.
The C -3 District provisions and boundaries are intended to promote
compatible land use relationships among diverse types of uses and
encourage well planned development or expansion in accord with the
approved Comprehensive Plan. Only those uses which substantially
interfere with the overall function of the general commercial area
will be excluded. On -site parking is not required in this
District.
PERMITTED USES
The following uses are permitted as regulated herein, without
special application requirements or conditions attached. Similar
uses may be allowed upon the determination of the City Council.
Trade and Services:
Any retail store or personal service business subject to
all regulations and such permits and licenses as may be
required by law, and further provided that the use is
not objectionable due to noise, fumes, smoke, odor or
vibration, including the following and other similar
uses.
Cultural facilities
Trade and business schools
Catering establishments
Employment agencies
Game and amusement arcades
Hotels and motels
Interior decorating service and sales
Offices for corporations and professionals
Publishing, job printing and blueprinting
Post Offices and other public service operations
Restaurants
Taverns
Theaters
Commercial Parking Lots
CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USES
Commercial parking ramps for passenger vehicles only, provided
a reservoir space is provided within the structure for holding
cars awaiting entrance, which reservoir space shall have a
capacity of no less than two vehicles.
Motor fuel and service stations excluding major repair
operation. (See Section 10.03)
•
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 23, 1992
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION OF AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
REGARDING PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES
It is the consensus of the Planning Commission to recommend
approval of the proposed changes requested by staff to the
Subdivision Ordinance.
•
0
9 411
0
M E 1.1 0 R A N D U M
DATE: December 3, 1991
TO: Planning Staff - G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Marka, G.
Field and M. Hensen
FROM: Bonnie
SUBJECT: CHANGES TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS SUGGESTED BY JIM
MARKA
Subd. 6. Public Site and Open Spaces. The following
requirements are applicable to all subdivisions within the
jurisdiction of the Park Board, Planning Commission and City
Council.
A. In subdividing land or resubdividing an existing
plat, due consideration shall be given to the subdivision and by
the Planning Committees upon review, to the dedication or
reservation of suitable sites for schools, conservation areas, or
open spaces and parks. Where a proposed public park, recreational
area or open space, as determined by the Comprehensive Plan,
is located in whole or in part
within a subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate such lands to
the City; provided, however, that the total dedication (exclusive
of public streets, alleys, and pedestrian ways, and exclusive of
all other purchased sites such as fire and police stations, water
towers and treatment plants and sewer lift stations), shall be
consistent with the following requirements:
1. Residential Zoned Subdivisions. For land within a
residential zone, formulas for land dedication shall be as follows:
Site or it. "ACL.Lket imild
(a)• Zoning Districts R -1 and R -2 A
land or cash dedication of 12% of the undeveloped site or its fair
market land value.
(b) Zoning Districts R -3
and R -4. A land or cash dedication of 15% of the undeveloped
site or its fair market land value.
(c). All Commercial and I /C1. A land or cash
dedication of 15% of the undeveloped site or its fair market value.
1d). Business Park and Industrial Zoned
Subdivision None required
1 � —�
2. Infrastructure assessments costs incurred with anv
of the land dedication above shall be calculated and levied against
the park or open space by lineal foot of frontage. In no case
shall the assessment cost levied against the park exceed 60% of the
value of the land dedicated.
3. For purposes of this Subdivision, "fair market land
value" is defined as the market value of the land within such plat
or subdivision as of the date presented to the Council for
preliminary approval, as determined by the City Assessor or the
sale price, whichever is higher, in the same manner as h-e they
shall determine the estimated market value of land for tax
purposes, excluding from such determination any value added to such
land by improvements serving such land, but including in such
determination the highest and best force at the time of the
platting.
4. Payment in Lieu of Dedication. The City shall have
the option of requiring a cash contribution in lieu of the land
dedication set forth in item 1, above. iset forth in item 2, aba ,
5. Partial Dedication and Partial Payment. The City
may permit or require the subdivider to provide a partial
dedication and a partial payment in accordance with the
requirements as set forth above.
6. The cash and land dedication value set forth above
shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board on an annual
basis and a revised schedule, if any, shall be set forth by the
Council.
B. When structures are constructed on property which has
been previously platted and on which plat no park dedication on
record in cash or land was given to the City, a park dedication fee
in accordance with the schedules hereinafter set forth shall be
paid at the time or the Subdivision agreement or when the building
permit is issued. It the park dedication as indicated on record
has been previously satisfied at the time of platting in accordance
with the requirements then in existence, then no further fee shall
be levied. If a partial payment has been made, then the balance of
the development shall be charged the rate set forth in Item 1,
above.
2
C. When building permits are issued on property which is
not platted and is not required to be platted prior to receiving a
building permit, a fee shall be paid at the time of building permit
issuance in accordance with the above schedule.
D. Sums of money so received by the City shall be placed in
a special account to be known as the Public Sites and Equipment
Fund and allocated by the Council solely for the acquisition of
land or purchase of equipment for public parks, recreation areas of
open spaces, development of existing parks and recreational areas,
or debt retirement in connection with the land or equipment
previously acquired for parks, recreational areas, or open areas.
E. Soil and Water Conservation. Pursuant to State statute,
the following may be required: The subdivider shall be responsible
for providing site development plans with provisions for the
control of drainage, erosion, and siltation if said plans are
considered necessary by the City Engineer for the purpose of soil
and water conservation.
F. The Council, at its option, may require a developer to
create a private entity to maintain some form of on -site recreation
for use by the site's residents, particularly preschool children.
This requirement may be in addition to the dedication of land or
cash for park or recreation purposes.
Source: Ordinance No.
Effective Date:
CC: Dolf Moon, Director of Park and Recreation
Park Board
•
3
e
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: January 23, 1992
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL FOR DANCE STUDIO ON HWY 7 W
The Planning Commission recommends the Conditional Use Permit be
approved as a yearly review in July, however, if the blacktop of
the parking, handicap accessibility and the frost footing issues
are resolved by July 1, 1992 the review of the conditional use
• permit will continue to July 1, 1993.
0
9-&q.
MINUTES FOR YOUR INF_ORNI�O.1�
•
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, January 21, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bill Craig at 7, 30
p.m. with the following members present: Dean Wood, Clint Gruett,
Roland Ebent, Tom Lyke, Craig Lenz and Chairman Bill Craig.
Absent: E1Roy Dobratz Also Present: Gary Plotz, City
Administrator, John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering, Jim Harka,
Building Official and Mark Hensen, Building Inspector.
2. MINUTES
Mr. Lyke made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Tuesday, December 17, 1991. Seconded by Mr. Ebent the
motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Chairman Craig read a letter from Mr. Joe Dooley withdrawing
his request for Conditional Use Permit on Roberts Rd. City
Administrator Gary Plotz explained the owner of the property
. Mr. Richard Smith will be proceeding with the request for a
Conditional Use Permit.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR MINI- STORAGE
Chairman Craig reopened the hearing at 7 :35 p.m. with the
reading of Publication #4328 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, December 5, 1991. The
request is for the purpose of considering a conditional
use permit to allow for the construction of commercial
and mini- storage located at Hwy 15 North.
City Administrator Plotz explained the staff
recommendation and concerns regarding drainage.
Mr. Condon explained his contact with the hospital and
discussions with Mr. Gib Lehman. He also suggested the
conditional use permit be approved contingent on hospital
approval and the staff recommendations being met. Mr.
Condon would like the possibility of water and sewer
availability to the site. City Engineer John Rodeberg
stated the site is close to water and sewer and a smaller
line could service the area.
• Mr. Condon explained if the sewer and water were not
available then only storage will be in the site and 5
spaces will be added for storage. With sewer and water
1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
however, commercial will be added.
Discussion followed on the concerns with drainage and
liability issues.
City Engineer Rodeberg explained the land is useless to
the Hospital and Burns Manor. Mr. Condon explained his
not creating a deep pond but more of a swamp.
Mr. Lehman, Hutchinson Hospital, explained what the
hospital has received which very limited. He stated the
hospital is concerned with drainage problems and Burns
Manor, but they are open to discussion with Mr. Condon
and the City staff. He commented on elevations and a
site plan.
Chairman Craig suggested to continue the request to
February to work out drainage and surface water.
Mr. Condon questioned the new ordinance and the cost of
the plan. He would like the Planning Commission to
respond individually to the possible decision. Chairman
Craig stated the only issue he can see is drainage and
if that is approved by the city he is in favor of the
request. Mr. Lenz agrees with Chairman Craig's response. •
Mr. Lyke abstained from commenting. Mr. Wood agreed with
Mr. Lenz and Mr. Craig. Mr. Ebent agrees with the
drainage being resolved and added if the building were to
be used for anything other than storage, all criteria for
City Building Codes will have to be met. Mr. Gruett
commented on staff recommendations and all criteria also
has to be met and he would back the project.
Mr. Wood moved to continue the hearing to February,
seconded by Mr. Lenz the motion carried unanimously.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
#464 - CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 7 :55 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4334 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 9, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering the adoption of
the revision of the Zoning Ordinance #464 for the City of
Hutchinson.
City Administrator Plotz commented on addressing only
some issues in the final draft and not page by page.
Building Official Jim Marka commented on the staff •
meeting addressing concerns of Mr. Don Glas, President
Firstate Federal and Mr. John Bernhagen, HCDC Director.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
He read correspondence from Mr. Glas regarding minimum
g g
square footage. City Engineer Rodeberg explained the
request for a minimum size house and enforcement level
as far as discrimination. Building Official Marka
explained the previous zoning ordinance requiring 24'
width. He stated that in most cases covenants by the
developer now limit the sizes of homes.
Mr. Marka then commented on Mr. Bernhagen's concerns some
of which are semantics. In Section 7.10 regarding yard
space encroachment some changes in wording were made to
make the section more understandable. Section 7.14
should have read Utility sheds. Discussion followed on
Section regarding Annexation. of land and the timing of
rezoning being up to the developer. Section 8.03 was
changed from 960 sq. ft. to 720 sq. ft. Section 8.04
"employees" is in regard to In Home Occupations. Section
8.07 regarding swimming pools should read "private use"
not "exclusive ". Mr. Marka stated the Building Code has
adopted a swimming pool requirement. Section 8.12, City
Engineer Rodeberg explained the 25' setback in C -4 and
the difference with regard to C -1 and C -2. Grain
elevators are addressed throughout the zoning ordinance.
Mr. Marka explained the zoning map does not, at this
. time, include I -1, I -2 and Business Park Districts.
Mr. Wood moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr.
Gruett the hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. Hr. Ebent made a
motion to approve the final draft of the ordinance noting
the changes directed by staff, seconded by Mr. Gruett the
motion carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
RICHARD SMITH FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DUPLEX ON ROBERTS RD
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8121 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4335 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 9, 1992. The
request is for a conditional use permit to allow for the
construction of a duplex in an R -1 District.
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the request by
the owner of the property and not the applicant. He also
stated this as a land use question.
There was discussion on the lot in regard to the church
parking lot and the fact the church has chosen not to
purchase the lot. Mr. Smith commented on the lots in the
area being PUD and would be sill to continue to the
• February meeting. City Engineer John Rodeberg explained
that there is no sanitary sewer in front of the lot and
the property owner would be responsible for the service.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Mr. Lenz made a motion to continue the hearing to the
February, seconded by Mr. Gruett the motion carried.
Mr. Bruce Ohland, 404 Boulder, questioned the drainage
and commented on problems he presently has. Mr. Rodeberg
stated the drainage would be addressed in the site plan.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT IN STONEY
POINT 3RD ADDITION
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8 :35 p.m. with the
reading of publication # 4336 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, January 9, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a petition to
vacate a utility easement located in Stoney Point 3rd
Addition.
City Administrator Gary Plotz stated new easements must
be provided. Mr. Lyke explained the existing feeder must
be moved at the owner's expense. Mr. Smith, property
owner, commented on the letter for relocating the
utilities.
City Engineer explained the terms of an easement. There .
was discussion on the easement issue, present concerns
and providing a drawing showing the easement location.
Mr. Wood moved to continue the hearing to the February
meeting, seconded by Mr. Lyke the motion carried.
Staff was directed to research the conditional use
permits granted for duplexes in R -1.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY BUD MAYNARD
LOCATED ON HWY 15 N
City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on sewer and water
hookup. Mr. Maynard explained the hookup and easement.
Mr. Rodeberg stated that if sewer and water are available
the property owner must hookup.
Mr. Lyke stated that gas and electric may need future
easements for underground service. Discussion followed
on the need for easements in lot splits.
Mr. Lenz moved to table the item to February, seconded by
4 0
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Mr. Gruett the motion carried.
(b) DISCUSSION OF AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
REGARDING PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES WITH
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
There was discussion of the Subdivision Ordinance
regarding parkland. Building Official Marka explained
the proposal of parkland contribution and the percentages
suggested. He stated the park board did have input on
the ordinance changes. Some of the new proposals would
be: if no record on parkland shows on a lot split the fee
can be maintained, equipment purchase is addressed, cash
contribution and developing of parks.
There was discussion on maintaining a good park system
and look ahead to the future.
Mr. Lenz moved to recommend approval of the proposal to
City Council, seconded by Mr. Ebent the motion carried
unanimously.
5. OLD BUSINESS
• (a) CONSIDERATION OF ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL FOR DANCE STUDIO
City Administrator Plotz commented on the history of the
property and annual review of the conditional use permit.
Hr. Hunsell stated he is the owner of the property. Mr.
Plotz explained the building must meet code. Building
Official Harka stated there are questions of handicap
accessibility and the building code regarding permanent
structures.
Mr. Munsell stated the parking lot will be hardsurfaced
in the Spring and handicap access is not a problem.
Discussion followed on access to the property. There was
discussion of renewal being yearly.
Mr. Wood made a motion to recommend approval as a yearly
review in July, however, if the blacktop of the parking,
handicap accessibility and the frost footing issues are
resolved by July 1, 1992 and review of the conditional
use permit will continue to July 1, 1993. Seconded by Mr.
Gruett the motion carried unanimously.
0 5
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
(b) COMMUNICATION FROH STAFF 0
City Engineer Rodeberg presented for information proposed
annexation and the McLeod County Fair Grounds site.
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
9 :55 P.M.
•
6 0
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 28, 1992
WATER & SEWER FUND
1991
DPC
chemicals
55.00
Fadden Pump
o rings
4.00
Junker
add'1 fee Nov & Dec
3,098.48
Quade Electric
light fixtures
180.00
1992
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
723.39
*PERA
employer contribution
407.99
Aagard West
Jan recycling
5,968.00
Ag Systems
belting
10.00
Automation Supply
disks
98.46
Crow Chemical & Ltg
coveralls
35.00
DNR
permit
3,082.50
DPC
chlorine
365.40
Dyna Systems
bandsaw blade
60.91
First Trust Bank
principal & interest
68,175.00
Fisher Scientific
lab supplies
4,448.74
General Repair Sery
pump repair
708.32
Hach
lab supplies
180.15
Hanson, Scott
conference expense
17.85
Harris Mechanical
Hutch Utilities
boiler work
electricity
318.96
389.46
Ind Maintenance Supplies
parts
96.29
Industrial Door
reversing edge
218.30
Instrumentation Sery
oxygen cell
89.38
LMCIT
3rd qtr gen liability
9,193.75
Meece, Merle
conference expense
21.58
Mid America Plastics
pipe
93.05
MN Section CSWPCA
reg -Lanz & Smoger
50.00
MN Valley Testing
tests
160.25
Motor Vehicle
license tab renewal
90.00
Munitech
meterhead repair
336.89
Nalco Chemical
corrosion
6,870.80
Nu Tech Env Corp
counteractant
1,094.00
U of M
reg- M.Graham
100.00
WEF
memberships
138.00
TOTAL
$106,879.90
//- -A I
•
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
1991
Jerabek Machine
1992
*Withhold Tax Acct
*PERA
Boyer Ford
Champion Auto
Hutch Machine & Tool
Juul
Motor Vehicle
Sweeney Brothers
Wigen Motor
GENERAL FUND
• 1991
Dostal, Vlasta
EPA Audio Visual
Hutch Conv & Visitor Bur
MN UC Fund
Quade Electric
Shopko
Two Way Communications
UBC
1992
*Kahler Plaza Hotel
*MN NAHRO
*MN NAHRO
*Withhold Tax Acct
*Gov Trg Service
*DNR
*DNR
*MN Dept of Revenue
*DNR
*PERA
Ackland, Paul
Allied Mechanical
AmeriData
Arnold & McDowell
• Automation Supply
Bennett Office
Bernhagen, John
Bethke,S.& TEK Mech
BJ Booksellers
Camera Shop
welds 269.84
employer contribution
100.42
employer contribution
58.80
truck
41,836.34
supplies
300.97
blades
60.00
haul loader
200.00
license & sales tax
2,751.36
elements
202.15
switch
13.11
TOTAL
$45,792.99
tour refund
5.00
projector
292.00
Dec lodging tax
1,363.56
4th quarter
1,607.25
wire
35.70
exercise bike
186.74
battery
113.55
lumber
49.17
lodging- C.Mangan
79.00
conf reg- C.Mangan
199.00
membership
65.00
employer contribution
5,060.14
reg- B.Anderson
115.00
registration fees
37.00
registration fees
339.00
Dec arena sales tax
287.56
registration fees
538.00
employer contribution
4,937.11
per diem
300.00
check sprinkler system
55.50
maintenance contract
484.00
Jan comp
3,084.00
paper & ribbons
110.02
bindings
32.58
Jan comp
2,019.00
housing rehab
2,750.00
travel book
24.00
reprints
24.48
•
Carney's
Century Labs
Chamber of Commerce
Charles Bailly
Com of Transportation
Cottage Corp
County Treasurer
Dataquest
Dept Labor & Ind
Dept Labor & Ind
Dept Public Safety
Digital Resource
Field, George
Fire Engineering
Fire Marshals Assc MN
Gov Fin Off Assc
Guardian Pest
Hutch Fire & Safety
Hutch Iron
Hutch Med Center
Hutch Pizza & Hexum Co
Hutch Utilities
Indep Info Services
ISIA
Johnson, Doug
K Mart
• Karg, Larry
Lee, Ernest
LMCIT
Loomis,L.& Skoog Co
McGarvey Coffee
MDRA
MDRA
Med- Compass
MN Dept Agriculture
MN Elevator
MN GFOA
MN Sports Fed
•
MN State Fire Dept Assc
MN Transportation Alliance
Motor Vehicle
MSSA
Mutoh America
Nat'l Arbor Day
Nat'l Inst Cert Eng
Nelson,D.& Menards
Old Log Theater
Olson's Locksmith
PC Express
Pioneerland Library
Popp, Ella
Rossell, Robert
Schmeling Oil
Schramm, Steve
Standard Printing
Templeton
Triarco
opalina
cleaners
1992 dues
audit work
hangar payment
boards
DL fees
renewal
exemption
license - Forcier
police plates
software
safety glasses & conf expen
subscription
membership
dues
service
inspections
steel
exam - Hanner
HCDC loan
electricity & gas
subscription
manuals
school expenses
supplies
meal expense
flags
3rd qtr gen liability
housing rehab
coffee
100 maps
dues
medical exams
pesticide license
elevator service
membership
league sanctioning
dues
1992 membership
license tab renewal
membership
repair
dues
membership
housing rehab
46 tickets & lunch
padlocks
xtree pro gold
1st quarter
theater refund
Star Tribune
used tank
battery stick
stamp
Jan contribution
art supplies
2.99
62.57
50.00
4,000.00
700.00
440.00
118.00
380.00
10.00
10.00
12.00
1,511.90
99.75
21.95
35.00
65.00
44.00
12.50
30.96
35.00
1,305.00
13,423.07
185.00
46.90
330.00
47.55
9.12
78.00
47,460.25
7,265.00
27.45
32.00
210.00
1,972.00
10.00
61.00
15.00
240.00
165.00
125.00
430.00
25.00
477.33
10.00
20.00
1,493.00
713.00
15.60
115.00
15,763.25
23.00
13.00
95.00
34.44
39.00
194.68
292.84
Turf Supply seed & milorganite 2,364.74
UBC supplies 109.30
Victorian Inn meeting 66.31
Viking Int Products canliners 242.53
Wieweck, Wendy gymnastics refund 11.00
Xerox transparencies 136.50
Youth Center Sp Rev Fund transfer 23,000.00
Zee Medical first aid supplies 49.10
TOTAL $150,575.94
BOND FUNDS
---------------------------
---------------------------
RURAL FIRE DEPT
1991
Dostal, Dean snowblowing 100.00
Two Way Communications siren repair 65.00
1992
• *Withhold Tax Acct employer contribution 273.11
TOTAL $438.11
YOUTH CENTER
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
70.46
*PERA
employer contribution
38.59
Coast to Coast
paint supplies
23.50
Fitzloff Hardware
screws
1.59
Farm & Home
supplies
33.45
UBC
window covers
47.00
K Mart
cleaning supplies
87.88
Star Cablevision
Feb service
23.10
Geyer Rental
rental
25.00
Hutch Utilities
elec & gas
516.08
Henry's Foods
supplies
276.26
TOTAL
$1,142.91
1992 TAX INC CONST
1991
Willard Pellinen survey blocks 400.00
1992
• *Farmers Elevator purchase building 84,500.00
TOTAL $84,900.00
f
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1992 Tax Inc Const
due to
84,500.00
1990 TAX INC CONST
1991
A & B Electric
build service
577.29
BONDS OF 1990
Alltech Engineering
est #2
7,177.59
1985 TAX INC DEBT SERV
First Trust Bank
principal & interest
24,000.00
BONDS OF 1985
First Trust Bank
principal & interest
178,500.00
BONDS OF 1981
First Natl Chicago
agent fees
418.75
BONDS OF 1988 DEBT SERV
American Natl Bank
matured bonds & interest
251,800.00
REC & POOL FUND DEBT SERV
American Natl Bank
matured bonds & interest
42,612.50
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV
L.Wakefield & MN Ext
HCDC loan
13,525.00
Hutch Pizza & Hexum Co
8% loan
495.00
TOTAL
$14,020.00
r:
1]
January 25, 1992 N VEDI
FOR YOU
Dear sirs:
Following is a concern about the Phase Two development
downtown project and its effect upon soverallocal small businesses and individuals.
Early 1991 the city approached several businesses in the phase
two area with an optimistic sales pitch backed with some signed options to purchase.
The business dealings I wish to address is with Triad
Transportation and Auto Systems located on 21 Hasson Street. This small company
generated revenues from outside the state as well as from local customers to the
Hutchinson Area through trucking and car detailing. Many of these funds as well as
wages were spent here in the area.
In an effort to support the Hutchinson Area and Triad's future
growth, Triad signed an option with the city and initiated a move north of town. This
relocation effort was funded by Triad's own cashflow. The decision to relocate was
based heavily on a quick decision by the city to act upon their option.
This relocation facilitated their business with ample space and a
clean environment to detail vehicles. The reason being any future construction
associated with phase one would not accommodate Semi Tractors /Trailers traffic in
some cases totalling 75 ft in length nor provide a relatively dirt free environment for
detailing vehicles.
It is understood that the decisions made had some degree of
speculation, influenced by an optimistic attitude of the city (implied or direct). It is
also understood that legally the said business has no hold on the city for
compensation.
However, some act of monetary consideration wil /be appreciated
to those small businesses and individuals who are left with accounts still owed them
by Triad that has since gone out of business because of strains on their cashflow
brought on by the cost of relocation and debt load of both properties.
Following is a list of those parties seen to be beneficiaries of the
properties in question and those that stand to lose monies owed them due to the
resulting actions taken. A workable remedy as seen by this individual is to pay the
owner of 21 Hasson St. ( Marquette Bank ) at /east the option price offered Triad
assumed to be $15,000 to $20,000 above Marquette Bank's cost to foreclose on
Triad. This overage to then be prorated to the business and individual creditors of
Triad to offset some of their losses.
TION
companies and Per Who Stand
To Lose Monies:
$5
Hutchinson Telephone
4,418.43
Coast To Coast
504.95
Crow River Glass
239.04
Pro Maintenance
84.80
Allied Mechanical
1,707.80
Standard Printing
1,204.56
Arnold & McDowell
500.00
7 West Truck Stop
10,244.51
Frank L. Barrus
7,500.00
Hansen Gravel
989.83
Cenex Coop
586.69
Hutchinson Medical Center
286.32
Gilmar Law Office
1,285.00
City of Hutchinson Water /Utilities
653.27
Those in a more favorable situation:
Marquette Bank will retain down payment ($3,500) and recoup any expenses through
sale of properties ( 21 Hansen St.) to the City for (approx. $45,000).
— we rearze this property may have gone to a third party already — •
Citizen's Bank will retain down payment (57,500) and recoup expenses through sale
of properties north of town to which Triad relocated.
City of Hutchinson to acquire distressed Property ( 21 Hassen St. ) from Marquette
Bank for phase two development below Option Offer of (approx. $63,000.)
We realize the city has an interest in redeveloping the downtown at the lowest
cost possible. This decision - making effort inherently involves inexperienced residents
in bargaining over prices. In view of this and the possibility that the city's actions
later revealed minor hardships on businesses such as: Triad, The Elk's Lodge, or Mike
Commerford, we would appreciate any effort on the city's part to lighten (within
prudent judgement) any hardships caused to local residents /businesses.
Take the necessary time to research this matter and inform me to your course
of action if any and l will convey your response /intent to the others so listed.
Thank You.
Frank L. Barrus
448 California Ave.
Hutchinson, MN. 85350
612 - 587 -2221
City D
i
TO: Gary Plotz
FROM: Solid Waste Advisory Committee i
DATE: January 27, 1992 Ff�. ' ,.,„ ..; ;.a,3'3r�!u
RE: 1992 Recycling Program
The Solid Waste Advisory Committee met on January 23,1992. Members'
present were Bob Bowen, Frank Mott, Pam Yost, JoAnn Jessen and.Mark
Schnobrich. The following items were discussed.
1.) A published list of items that can bed recycled should
again be distributed to-:resident recyclers. Either,
news ad or flier.
2.) Volume based pricing for refuse fees.. An example being'a
base fee for either a 30 gallon or 60 gallon container, acid
a set, additional fee for extra bags or stickers for refuse
exceeding the 30 or 60 gallon level. Questions revolving
around whether to use containers (garbage cans) or bags
as the choice of receptacle for the base'l.evel was dis-
cussed. Bags being the less expensive than -tile- cans. Also,`
as to whether the contracted hauler, the city or the cus-
tomer bares the cost of the cans.
3.) The Advisory Committee also showed interest in being repre-
sented on the Mayor's Refuse /Recycling Negotiation
Committee for 1992.
klm
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police,Departiiieut
37 IVashhigtoit A vetzue IVcst 900 Harringtott Street 10P k Streei Soitth
(612) 5S1 (612) 557 -2973 (612) '587-22 2 42
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Printed on n:cyeled paper -
•
•
2728 2g�
�`��Z 4
ti JAN 11 w
N L°COYED
gY
....... - --
l
< <`9` Sl V
ANASAL Incorporated
965 E. Frontage Rd.
Litchfield, MN 55324
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Mayor Paul Ackland
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn 55350
Dear Paul,
I have decided not to open the Hangar. I would like to thank you
and the city council for holding the special meeting for me.
Hutchinson is an excellent city and I plan on pursuing other
business opportunities there.
Please contact Bonny Baumetz and let haknow of my decision. She
was very helpful and informative.
Sin�c�
�
Mark Gaarder
40
DAVID B. ARNO LD
GARY D. MCDOWELL
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. BARRY ANDERSON'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LAURA K. PRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE'
M.PAIEMENT
JAMES UTLEY
RICHARD 0. McGEE
TIMOTHY W. FAFINSKI
MARY E. HORROCKS
CATHRYN D. REBER
January 28, 1992
ARNOLD & MCDO`VELL
ATTORNEYS AT LANV
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(612) 587 -7575
PAX (612) 587 -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
O. HARRY ANDERSON
Mr. Tim Nelson
The Everest Group, Ltd.
2685 Long Lake Road
P.O. Box 130190
Roseville, Mn. 55113
Re: Hutchinson Downtown Redevelopment - Phase II
(Site Purchase)
Our File No. 3244 -91046
Dear Tim:
OF COUNSEL
WILLIAM W.CAMERON
RAYMOND C. LALLI ER
PAUL M. BEGICH
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL"
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 53416
(612) 545 -9000
MN TOLL FREE 800-343-4545
PAX ( 612) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389-2214
PAX (612) 389-5506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
526 272 8
�Q?
qvsl � Zl l 0 6�ti
This letter is a follow up to our correspondence of Friday, January
24, 1992 regarding the lease between Erickson's and the City of
Hutchinson with respect to a potential liquor store. It appears
from our numbers that the liquor store will have gross sales of
something in excess of $1.5 million and more than 150,000 customer
"stops" per year, so design and construction issues are important
insofar as the liquor store is concerned.
However, most of this correspondence deals with issues relating to
the lease. I bring to your attention the following:
1. Thirty Day Window. It is important to the City to get
the development agreement completed immediately. We have
a number of critical decisions to make relative to this
development and the agreement is essential to those
decisions. Issues relating to the liquor store may not
get resolved immediately. Accordingly, a thirty day
window should be included during which negotiations with
respect to the liquor store should be completed.
Obviously, if the liquor store project did not move ahead
for some reason, Erickson 's would not be expected to
construct a 46,000 square foot store, but rather a 41,000
square foot store.
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. Tim Nelson
January 28, 1992
Page 2
2. Interior Cut. Store design should take into account an
interior cut next to a delicatessen. The City has
selected a consultant who is ready to meet with
Erickson's, or yourselves, immediately with regard to
planning issues.
3. Advertising, Restrictions relating to advertising in
windows and exterior signage need to be removed. (See
Section 14, page 20).
4. Sublease. It is my understanding that the City may
sublease the premises with the consent of Erickson's
which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. In
addition to the escape "windows" provided in the lease,
the City needs to have a clause that allows the City to
get out from under the lease if the City is required to
close the liquor store by referendum, state law or if
grocery stores are allowed to sell liquor or wine in a
municipality. I don't expect any of these things to
happen, but at various times, they have all been .
discussed at the legislature.
5. Store Size. Given our cooler requirements, it is
beginning to look like we might need 6,000 square feet.
This issue should be discussed.
6. Liquor Store Loading Dock. There will need to be a
separate liquor store loading dock.
7. Hazardous Substances. Note paragraph 8 (3) which
prohibits Hutchinson from having distillates on the
premises. For obvious,reasons, that reference will need
to be deleted.
8. Incinerator. The main agreement and also the lease
should include a prohibition against having an
incinerator on the premises. I neglected to mention this
point in my letter to you of last Friday, but you may
recall, it is an issue that we discussed and was part of
the last package of material received from Erickson's.
9. vending Machines. No pop or vending machines should be
located outside the main store or the liquor store.
These are a significant source of revenue for the City •
liquor operation. Obviously, there would be no
f
Mr. Tim Nelson
January 28, 1992
Page 3
prohibition on such vending machines within the store.
The City would also like to be involved in issues
relating to the location of outdoor garden centers,
Christmas tree sales and the like, although those issues
are properly within the jurisdiction of the landlord.
10. Alterations. Clarification is required. Interior
alterations should be at the sole discretion of the City
and all interior alterations should remain the property
of the City (shelves, coolers, fixtures and the like) .
11. Parking. The City will need liquor store only and 11 15
minute" type parking and will need to have the ability
to place signs to allow such parking. (See paragraph 9
(a) .
12. Outdoor Sales. Unless authorized by the City, selling
of goods would not be permitted in front of the proposed
liquor store. (This could be part of a larger paragraph
dealing with parking lot sales and other similar issues.
Some of the language from the much maligned cross
easement agreement between the City and ShopKo may be
helpful in this regard).
13. Changes in Common Areas. The City should have approval
rights if there are changes or alterations in exterior
common areas, driveways, parking, traffic directional
flows, loading zones, etc., since they may effect the
tenancy. See page 13, Section C.
14. Minimum Rent and Building Maintenance Issues._ The City
is going to want an agreement in advance on the maximum
amount to be charged for rent and building maintenance
issues. I recognize, in this connection, that you may
need to know more information regarding the interior of
the store to determine that amount. It is also my
understanding that the proposed construction plan would
include interior improvements and we need to make clear
in the agreement whidh interior improvements are
included. (Electrical panels, lights, walls, ceilings
and other similar issues).
15. Personal Property Taxes. Paragraph 11A dealing with
personal property taxes can be deleted.
16. Metering Issues. The City of Hutchinson would agree that
s
Mr. Tim Nelson
January 28, 1992
Page 4
gas, electricity and water service to the City's building
would be separately metered.
17. Insurance Coveracte Issues. (Pages 18 and 19) . The
City's insurance coverage will be in the amounts required
by Chapter 466 of Minnesota Statutes.
18. Common Area Cost Charges. With the exception of taxes,
obviously undetermined, the common area cost charges
should be determined. This charge, incidentally, should
be fairly minimal in view of the fact that the City will
be paying all of the utility expenses and taxes
attributable to its building.
19. Change in Use. The City would have the option to
terminate the lease if the grocery store ceases to
operate or if use changes.
}
20. Financial Information. Delete Section 30, page 38 unless
Erickson's wishes to do the same. (As a practical
matter, information relating to the City's liquor store •
is part of the City's annual budget).
21. Security Deposit. I thipk we have previously agreed that
a security.deposit makes no sense in this case.
22. Security Agreements. The City should have the option to
install a separate security system at no expense to
Erickson's.
No doubt there are matters that I have forgotten, but these seem
to be the issues at the present time.
Thank you. Best regards.
Very yours /
ARN & cDOWEZ
G. y 'Anderson
G A:lm
CC Gary D. Plotz
Paul Ackland
Council Members
i
Liquor Store Comparison
Liquor Store Comparison
