Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
cp04-28-1992 ci U TCH I IT 0 1\1
CITY
CALENDAR-
WEEK' OF
April 26 TO Mav 2
1
1992
WEDNESDAY
-29-
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meetinj
at City Hall
SUNDAY
-26-
� e
e
THURSDAY
-30-
MO
-27-
Noon - Safety Council Mee
at Heritage Center
1:00 P.M. - Utilities Commission
Meeting at Utilities
FRIDAY
-I-
APRIL SHOWER
TU`DAY
-28-
:00 P.M. - Open Bids on G.O.
Bonds at City Hall
:30 P.M. - Closed City Counci:
Meeting to Discuss
Potential Litigatia
:30 P.M. - City Council
Meeting at City
Hall
SATURDAY
-2-
TEVE MADSON - April 27 -30
(FBI Conf.)
M3
5:00 P.M. - Park S Recreatio
Board Meeting at
Library Conferen
Room
7
f
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1992
1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M.
2.
Invocation
-
Rev.
Harold McGowan,
Bethany Baptist Church
3.
Consideration
of Minutes
Bid Openings of March 17, 1992 and April 13, 1992; Continued
Regular Meeting of March 20, 1992; Special Meeting of April 1,
1992; and Regular Meeting of April 14, 1992
Action - Approve as Distributed - Approve as amended
4. Routine Items
(a) Reports of Officers, Boards and Commissions
1. Financial Report - March 1992
2. Senior Advisory Board Minutes of Feb. 13, 1992
• 3. Planning Commission Minutes of March 17 & March 24,
1992
4. Airport Commission Minutes of March 2, 1992
5. Park & Recreation Board Minutes of Feb. 26, 1992
6. Report of City Investments
(b) Reconfirmation of Approved Gambling License for Elks
Lodge As Requested By State Gambling Board
(c) Applications for On -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor
Licenses
1. Crow River Country Club
2. Godfather's Pizza
3. Gold Coin
4. Pizza Hut
5. Little Crow Bowling Lanes
6. Lamplighter's Lounge II
7. J's Sports Bar
40
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 •
(d) Applications for off -Sale Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquor
Licenses
1. Cash Wise Foods
2. Erickson Freedom Station (Hwy. 7 & 15)
3. George's Food & Fuel
4. Citgo - Quikmart
5. Southtown Mobil
6. Tom Thumb Food Market
7. SuperAmerica
(e) Application for Parade Permit
1. American Legion Post 96 - May 25, 1992
2. March of Dimes - May 17, 1992
Action - Motion to order report and minutes filed and
reconfirm and issue licenses and permit
5. Public Hearing - 8:00 P.M.
None
6. Communications Reauests And Petitions •
(a) Consideration of Request for Jaycee Water Carnival
Permits:
1. Parade Permit
2. Dance Permit
3. Fireworks Permit
4. Permission to close streets and use Library Square
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue
permits and waive fees and rentals
(b) Consideration of Request for Non - Intoxicating Liquor
License and Set -Up License for Jaycee Water Carnival,
June 18 -21, 1992
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and issue
license and waive fees
(c) Consideration of Request for City Donation to Jaycee
Water Carnival
Action -
is
2
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992
(a) Ordinance No. 92 -54 - Subdivision Ordinance, Public
Site And Open Spaces
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive first
reading and set second reading for May 12, 1992
(b) Resolution No. 9698 - Requesting MN /DOT For Cost
Participation On T.H. No. 22 Improvements, Letting
No. 3, Project No. 92 -05
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to waive reading and
adopt
8. Unfinished Business
(a) Consideration of Wellness Program Proposal
(DEFERRED JANUARY 14, 1992)
Action -
(b) Consideration of Transfer of Cable Television Franchise
• (DEFERRED JANUARY 28, 1992)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to schedule public hearing
(c) Update Status of Word of Life Issues
Action -
- r
(a) Consideration of Delinquent Water and Sewer Accounts
Action - Motion to authorize extension of payment
period - Motion to authorize discontinuation of service
(b) Consideration of Awarding Bids for:
1. $605,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1992
2. $325,000 General Obligation Refunding Recreation
Center Bonds, Series 1992
n
U
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 0
3. $1,200,000 General Obligation Refunding Improvement
Bonds, Series 1992
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution
(c) Consideration of Revokation of Issuance of Liquor
License to Mark Gaarder, dba The Hangar Bar & Grill;
Flyer's Night Club
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
revoke
(d) Consideration of Revokation of Issuance of Liquor
License to Steve Picha, dba Hutch Pizza, Inc.; J's
Pizza Garten /Sports Bar
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
revoke
(e) Review of 1992 General Fund Budget Adjustments
Action -
(f) Consideration of Licensing for Refuse Haulers •
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive first reading of Ordinance and set second
reading for May 12, 1992
(g) Consideration of Authorizing Staff to Advertise for
Bids for Interim Garbage Pickup for Service Between
July 1, 1992 to October 1, 1992
Action -
(h) Discussion of Policy Alternatives for Delinquent And
Deferred Assessments
Action -
(i) Consideration of Policy On Tax Forfeiture Assessments
Action -
(j) Consideration of Advertising for Bids to Purchase
Combination Jet And Vacuum Truck
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve •
4
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992
•
(k) Discussion of Hutchinson Area Transportation Services
Facility Report
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(1) Consideration of Receiving Report And Calling Hearing
On Improvement for Letting No. 9, Project No. 92 -14 &
92 -15
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and
accept report and set hearing for May 12, 1992 at 8:00
P.M. - Motion to waive readings and adopt Resolutions
No. 9699 & 9700
(m) Consideration of Approving Plans And Specifications And
Ordering Advertisement for Bids On Letting No. 4,
Project No. 92 -07
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9701
(n) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment
Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 1,
• Project No. 92 -01
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll
preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9702 & 9703
(o) Consideration of Ordering Preparation of Assessment
Roll And Setting Assessment Hearing for Letting No. 1,
Project No. 92 -03 & 92 -04
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve roll
preparation and hold hearing - Motion to waive reading
and adopt Resolution No. 9704 & 9705
(p) Consideration of Awarding Letting No. 1 /Part B for
Project No. 92 -03, Priebe Addition And Project No.
92 -04, Betker's Second Addition
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award
bid
0 5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992
(q) Consideration of Approving MN /DOT Traffic Control
Signal Agreement for Letting No. 5, Project No. 92 -08,
Main Street (TH 15) Traffic Control And Signal
Improvements
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter
into agreement
(r) Discussion of GIS /GPS Development
Action -
(s) Discussion of Trebelhorn/Brandt Encroachment And
Drainage Issue
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to begin legal proceedings
(t) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Francis Condon On Hwy. 15 North for Mini - Storage with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(u) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By •
Richard Smith On Roberts Road with Unfavorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(v) Consideration of Vacation of Utility Easement Requested
By Richard Smith In Stoney Point Third Addition with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(w) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Requested By
Jeff Munsell for Construction of Car Wash On Hwy. 7
West with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
2
is
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992
(x) Consideration of Preliminary And Final Plat of First
Addition to Peterson Terrace Submitted By Redman Real
Estate with Favorable Recommendation of Planning
Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion
to waive reading and adopt Resolution No. 9706
(y) Consideration of Preliminary Plat of Golf View
Subdivision Submitted by Kevin Compton with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(z) Consideration of Preliminary Plat Submitted By Skip
Quade, Acoma Township, Two Mile Radius, with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and refer
to County
(aa) Consideration of Sketch Plan Submitted By Dan Huebert,
Acoma Township, Two Mile Radius, with Favorable
• Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection
(bb) Consideration of One -Time Six Month Variance Extension
for Cedar Crest Estate with Favorable Recommendation of
Planning Commission
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(cc) Consideration of Rezoning from Agricultural to
Residential Requested By Skip Quade, Two Mile Radius,
with Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to refer to County with unfavorable
recommendation
(dd) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit for Feed Lot
Requested By Tim Albrecht, Two Mile Radius, with
Unfavorable Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to refer to County with unfavorable
recommendation
r 1
U
7
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - APRIL 28, 1992 •
(ee) Consideration of Conditional Use Permit to Move Mobile
Home Requested By Oliver Johnson with Favorable
Recommendation of Planning Commission
Action - Motion to refer to County with no objection
lo. Miscellaneous
(a) Communications from City Administrator
11. Claims, Appropriations And Contract Payments
(a) Verified Claims
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from
appropriate funds
12. Adjournment
0
•
8
MINUTES
BID OPENING
TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 1992
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 P.M. by City Administrator
Gary D. Plotz. Also present were Supervisors Doug Meier and Larry
Karg, as well as Administrative Secretary Marilyn Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 4343, Invitation for Bids, Purchase
of One New Double Drum Vibratory Asphalt Compactor, was dispensed
with. The following bids were opened and read:
The bids were referred to Supervisors Meier and Karg for review and
a recommendation at the March 24, 1992 City Council meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 2:17 P.M.
•
A
INTEREST
COMPANY
BID NO. 1
BID NO, 2
RATE
Aspen Equipment Co.
$22,033.00
$ 8,598.20
6.88
Savage, MN
1,333.00
5,514.80
7.02
Carlson Equipment Co.
25,898.00
10,027.92
10.00
St. Paul, MN
6,757.08
11.00
Case Power & Equipment
20,091.00
7,218.50
8.00
• Shakopee, MN
4,659.18
Mpls. Equipment Co.
24,500.00
9,274.00
11.00
Mpls., MN
5,979.00
14.02
Ruffridge - Johnson Eqmt.
22,989.00
--
--
Mpls., MN
Sweeney Bros. Tractor
23,950.00
8,520.01
7.02
Burnsville, MN
5,460.95
Vermeer Sales & Service
18,500.00
--
--
Burnsville, MN
Ziegler
21,864.00
--
6.5
Mpls., MN
The bids were referred to Supervisors Meier and Karg for review and
a recommendation at the March 24, 1992 City Council meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 2:17 P.M.
•
A
....... . . . . . n _,ti.__ �._._._._,w. 'vv ,'!c ,. ..
MINUTES
BID OPENING
MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1992
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz opened the meeting at 2:00 P.M.
Also present were Assistant Engineer Cal Rice and Administrative
Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson.
Mr. Plotz read Publication No. 4359, Notice of Advertisement for
Farm Land Rental. The following bid was opened and read:
Donald Sitz, Hutchinson, MN
Three -Year Bid: 1992 - -$35 /acre
1993 - -$40 /acre
1994 - -$45 /acre
Mr. Plotz dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 4342,
Letting No. 1, Project No. 92 -01, 92 -03, and 92 -04, Advertisement
for Bids. The following bids were opened and read:
Duininck Bros., Inc.
$360,771.65
- A
Prinsburg, MN
88,421.60
- B •
$449,193.25
- Total
LaTour Construction, Inc.
$355,097.30
- A
Maple Lake, MN
90,897.15
- B
$445,994.45
- Total
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
$318,319.90
- A
Hamburg, MN
86,149.10 -
B
$404,469.00 -
Total
The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 2:12 P.M.
•
• MINUTES
CONTINUED MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 12:00 noon by Mayor
Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland,
Councilmen Craig Lenz and Marlin Torgerson. Absent: Council-
men John Mlinar and Don Erickson. Also present: Finance
Director Kenneth B. Merrill, City Engineer John Rodeberg, City
Attorney G. Barry Anderson, Dean Wood of Planning Commission
and Jerry Cornell of Utilities Commission.
DISCUSSION OF DAKOTA RAIL ISSUES
Mayor Ackland stated he had invited members of the Planning
Commission and Utilities Commission to the meeting since the
railroad issues also pertained to them.
City Attorney Anderson reported on the four railroad issues:
(1) Les Kouba Parkway, (2) rail car rehabilitation between
Bluff Street and Main Street to do car repair work, (3)
assessments on Third Avenue N.W., and (4) dispute regarding
language and interpretation of two elevator leases.
• Attorney Anderson stated Dakota Rail would need a conditional
use permit to perform the car repair work. He further report-
ed the assessments in question were not attested at the public
hearing. The City Attorney suggested alternatives and options
regarding the issues. It was his recommendation to discuss
this matter further at the regular City Council meeting on
March 24 and for the Utilities Commission members to attend
the special Planning Commission meeting on March 24 at 5:00
P.M.
Attorney Anderson reported some of the options on Phase II
properties will expire April 1, 1992. It was necessary to
move forward with the Elks and Wigens options. The City At-
torney would have additional information for the March 24
Council meeting.
4.
The meeting adjourned at 12:50 P.M.
IN
• MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 1, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 12:15 P.M. by Mayor
Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L. Ackland,
Councilmen Craig Lenz, Marlin Torgerson and Don Erickson.
Absent: Councilman John Mlinar. Also present: Finance Direc-
tor Kenneth B. Merrill and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN ORGANIZED REFUSE
COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR RESIDENTIAL ONLY
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read the Notice
of Public Hearing, Publication No. 4356.
The Mayor stated he had appointed a refuse committee about a
month ago to consider alternatives. As of July 1, all commer-
cial and industrial refuse would be open to any private
hauler. There were several suggestions for residential haul-
ing.
• City Attorney Anderson reported the organized collection had
a two -phase process: (1) discussion with the existing licensed
hauler and consideration of proposal(s), and (2) proposals
from other haulers if phase one was not successful. The City
would need to hold a public hearing to move forward with the
Resolution.
Lucille Dufresne, 1000 Sunset Street, inquired if the resi-
dents would be billed according to the amount of garbage
accumulated. She had only one bag per week.
Mayor Ackland responded refuse pickup would be on a volume -
based garbage collection according to what was produced.
Mark Schnobrich, 545 Clinton, asked about the recycling pro-
gram.
The Mayor stated the Refuse Contract Committee had not
addressed the issue, but there would still be recycling.
Gentleman from 245 College Avenue commented on business and
residential being charged the same rate. He did not feel it
was fair. He asked if cardboard would be recycled.
• Mayor Ackland reported the committee was trying to determine
the definition of a business. If a residential unit could
qualify for up to a 90- gallon container, it would be classi-
fied under residential rate. Anything over that amount would
1�f
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING - APRIL 1, 1992 •
be negotiated with the hauler and categorized at a commercial
rate. State law dictated that after January 1 grass clippings
and leaves could not go to the landfill.
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman
Torgerson and unanimously carried, to close the hearing at
12:35 P.M.
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Councilman
Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and waive read-
ing and adopt Resolution No. 9691.
3. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR LIQUOR STORE
CONDOMINIUM UNIT WITH ERICKSON'S DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION
City Attorney Anderson reviewed the revised document.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman Tor -
gerson to approve the agreement as drafted, with the City At-
torney to address the proposed changes on page 9 (ii), page
11 -D regarding wording of "not less than," and the common roof
repair issue. Motion seconded by Councilman Erickson and •
unanimously carried.
The City Attorney reported on the closing with Krammer Enter-
prises. Following discussion, the motion was made by coun-
cilman Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve.
City Attorney Anderson updated the Council on the latest
developments regarding the railroad issues.
The meeting adjourned at 1:30 P.M.
•
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 1992
1. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor
Ackland. The following were present: Mayor Paul L.
Ackland, Councilmen Craig Lenz, John Mlinar, Marlin
Torgerson, and Don Erickson. Also present: City
Administrator Gary D. Plotz, City Engineer John Rodeberg
and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
• •
The invocation was given by the Reverend Harold McGowan.
3. MINUTES
The minutes of the public hearing of February 25, 1992,
regular meetings of March 10, 1992 and March 24, 1992,
and continued regular meeting of March 13, 1992 were
approved as distributed.
• (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1.
BUILDING
OFFICIAL'S
REPORT
- MARCH
1992
2.
AIRPORT
COMMISSION
MINUTES
OF MARCH
30, 1992
3. REFUSE CONTRACT COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 2, 1992
(b) USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE ON APRIL 25, 1992 FOR GREEN -UP
CLEAN -UP DAY
(c) RECONFIRMATION OF APPROVED GAMBLING LICENSE FOR 40 S 8
AT AMERICAN LEGION AS REQUESTED BY STATE GAMBLING BOARD
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to order
report and minutes filed, approve the request and recon-
firm license.
(a) INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR J'S PIZZA/
SPORTS BAR, STEVE PICHA OWNER
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order and read the
notice of hearing.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 9
Councilman Erickson moved to close the hearing at 8:01
P.M. Motion seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani-
mously carried.
Mr. Steve Picha stated Hutch Pizza, Inc. was dissolved,
and he would be the operator of both operations.
Following considerable discussion, the motion was made by
Councilman Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and
unanimously carried, to approve and issue a one -year
license.
(b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 92 -09 (OLD IVY LANE CONCRETE
APRON IMPROVEMENT)
Mayor Ackland called the hearing to order at 8:18 P.M.
and read the notice of hearing.
Engineer Rodeberg expressed concern regarding the speed
of traffic in the area. He stated a petition was re-
ceived from 11 of the 12 property owners opposing the
project. •
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to close the
hearing at 8:20 P.M.
Jerry Nass, 625 Main St. S., stated he attended two other
meetings regarding the alley project. He stated narrow-
ing up the apron would not cure the problem. The problem
started when Main Street was redone. Mr. Nass said he
understood the City would take care of the alley, but now
there was a cost involved. He questioned how the City
could assess residents without an Ivy Lane address for an
alley improvement. The people living on the street are
on fixed income. He signed the petition because he did
not feel the residents should pay the assessment. Mr.
Nass wanted it left the way it was, with the frost boils
dug out. He commented something should be done for
street control and divert some of the traffic.
The City Engineer reported the area was vacated to an
alley because no one was using it as a street. The land
was returned to the private property owners. It did not
look like a street since other streets had a 30 foot
apron. He stated someone had to pay for the assessment.
Engineer Rodeberg commented it would cost $3,000 for the
work the City could not do itself.
. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
Mr. Bloom, 605 Main St., questioned why he should pay
for the assessment.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to reject the project and to waive reading and
adopt Resolution No. 9696.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO CONDUCT CROP WALK FOR THE
HUNGRY ON MAY 2, 1992
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve.
(a) ORDINANCE NO. 92 -56 - SHORELAND MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE;
CITY CODE: CHAPTER 11, APPENDIX A
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to waive second
reading and adopt.
(b) RESOLUTION NO. 9692 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS,
LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NOS. 92 -01, 92 -03 & 92 -04
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt.
(c) RESOLUTION NO. 9693 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS,
LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NOS. 92 -02 & 92 -09
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt.
(d) RESOLUTION NO. 9694 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING $156,250 FROM
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
• reading and adopt.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
(e) RESOLUTION NO. 9695 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Erickson and unanimously carried, to waive
reading and adopt.
B. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING PUBLIC HEARING FOR INTOXICATING
LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION AT LAMPLIGHTER LOUNGE II
LOCATED AT PLAZA 15, GARY LANDREVILLE OWNER
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve and set a public hearing for April
28, 1992 at 8:00 P.M.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY KEITH GUNDERSON FOR
ASSESSMENT PAYMENT SCHEDULE FOR LOT LOCATED BY
VICTORIAN INN
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to table.
(c) DISCUSSION OF MAINSTREET REQUEST FOR POPCORN WAGON IN
LIBRARY SQUARE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve and authorize the City Attorney to
prepare a franchise agreement.
(d) DISCUSSION OF LOCATING FARMERS MARKET BY LIBRARY SQUARE
FOR 1992 SEASON
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve location.
(e) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING FUEL CONTRACT FOR 1992 -93
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman •
4
0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to award contract to low bid of Cenex.
(f) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR VIBRATORY ASPHALT
COMPACTOR
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unani-
mously carried, to award bid for $18,500 to Vermeer Sales
and Service.
(g) CONSIDERATION OF CRACKFILLING EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Erickson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve $21,070 for the purchase of crack -
filling equipment.
(h) CONSIDERATION OF 1991 WATER /SEWER FUND REIMBURSEMENT TO
GENERAL FUND
•
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to approve reimbursement.
(i) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING MAY 1 DEADLINE FOR PROPOSAL
FROM JUNKER SANITATION FOR REFUSE SERVICE
City Attorney Anderson stated the City had to comply with
the Statute of a 90 -day waiting period to negotiate with
the present hauler, Junker Sanitation. He suggested a
date of May 15. Attorney Anderson reported there was a
bill before the Legislature to extend the interim hauling
until October 1. On January 1, 1993 there will be an
ordinance to license all haulers.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously
carried, to give Junker until May 15, and then proceed.
(j) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING WATER STORAGE TANK ENGINEERING
CONTRACT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried, to approve and award the contract to RCM.
•
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
(k) DISCUSSION OF OLD MUNICIPAL LANDFILL MITIGATION
Engineer Rodeberg reported on the background of the
issue. He stated it would cost $8,800 to complete the
preliminary study and mitigation. The City had requested
funding from the McLeod County Solid Waste Abatement Fund
to help defray the cost of the study and to meet MPCA re-
quirements.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve subject to County funding.
(1) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING HEARING DATE REGARDING CROW
RIVER DAM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Lenz and unanimously car-
ried, to approve and set hearing for April 22, 1992 at
7:00 P.M.
A
(m) DISCUSSION OF 1992 AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT •
The Director of Engineering reported on the proposed air-
port expansion. He stated Federal Transportation funding
might be available later this year, with matching City
funds, to cover the $150,000 cost of the improvement.
The City Engineer requested approval of three items to
proceed with the project.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Mlinar and unanimously
carried, to approve the three items.
(n) CONSIDERATION OF MCLEOD COUNTY PURCHASE OF PROPERTY FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF CSAH 8 (AIRPORT ROAD)
(DEFERRED JANUARY 28, 1992)
Engineer Rodeberg recommended the easements be given to
McLeod County at a one dollar sum and the "other good and
valuable considerations" noted in the easements be nego-
tiated with the County.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve the recommendation and enter into
temporary slope easement with the County. is
6
Cl
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
(o) CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION REGARDING SPEED LIMITS ALONG
AIRPORT ROAD
The Director of Engineering commented on the speed limit
along the fringe road. He did not want it to be a resi-
dential speed or reduced less than 45 m.p.h. It would
require State approval to reduce the speed limit.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Torgerson, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimous-
ly carried, to approve and to waive reading and adopt
Resolution No. 9697.
(p) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR RENTAL OF FARM LAND BY
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to approve and enter into lease with Don Sitz.
•
(q) DISCUSSION OF REORGANIZATION OF LEGAL AFFAIRS FOR CITY OF
HUTCHINSON
City Attorney Anderson stated the bulk of the routine
issues were related to the Police Department. It was his
firm's proposal that the City increase its budget by
$10,000 for city attorney activities in 1992 and in sub-
sequent years. An assistant city attorney would be hired
by the law firm of Arnold & McDowell, including benefits,
but have an office in the Police Department.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried, to approve $10,000 a year for an assistant city
attorney and to provide staff support and an office in
the Police Department.
(r) CONSIDERATION OF EASEMENT RELEASE FOR BRUCE AND TRACI
FENSRE
Engineer Rodeberg stated the easement did not effect the
Fenske parcel and could be released.
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Lenz, seconded by Councilman Erickson and unanimously
carried, to approve and sign the release of easement.
•
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
(s) CONSIDERATION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONDOMINIUM
(LIQUOR STORE)
The City Attorney reported he was waiting for the final
copy of the agreement. No action was taken.
1 y •
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
City Administrator Plotz reported on the joint Council
and Utilities Commission meeting held last night. He
commented that the Utilities had offered the City a
suburban van and lawn mower tractor in exchange for free
mowing services.
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Torgerson and unanimously carried, to approve and
enter into agreement.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM FAIR BOARD REPRESENTATIVES
A
Tim Ulrich and Jim Haugen presented a drawing of the pro- •
posed fair grounds layout. Discussion followed regarding
some of the concerns related to the project.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN JOHN MLINAR
Councilman Mlinar commented on the letter from Briggs and
Morgan. He asked if there was some concern regarding the
members of the Refuse Committee. Councilman Mlinar also
inquired about the cable television issue.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN MARLIN TORGERSON
Councilman Torgerson stated it was brought to his atten-
tion that Pishney Lane had parking on both sides of the
street. Since emergency vehicles could not get through,
it was his suggestion to limit parking to one side of the
street.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCILMAN DON ERICKSON
Councilman Erickson commented on the letter received from
Word of Life. He inquired about the status of the issue.
•
0
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992
(f) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
The City Attorney reported he had met with D.D. Cable.
It appeared the company qualified from a legal stand-
point.
Attorney Anderson stated a disciplinary hearing would be
held on May 5. The Police Commission chairman requested
authorization to hire legal counsel for the Commission.
The motion was made by Councilman Lenz, seconded by Coun-
cilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the re-
quest, subject to $5,000.
City Attorney Anderson commented on the Dakota Rail is-
sues. He presented a two -part settlement with the Les
Rouba Parkway and the utilities land. The City could
take two approaches: (1) go back to Dakota Rail with the
suggestion of assessments as previously discussed as a
settlement offer, or (2) go to Dakota Rail with condem-
nation to enforce the original option.
• The City Attorney requested the City hire Dorsey &
Whitney as legal counsel in a lawsuit since he could be
called upon as a witness.
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve
Dorsey & Whitney as legal counsel.
(g) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Engineer Rodeberg reported he was working with the County
to rebuild the street after the detour was removed. An
agreement between the County and State would make it a
state aid highway while the detour is in effect.
The City Engineer stated McDonald Drive, which goes past
the trailer court, was being platted and would be re-
corded. The property owner would dedicate the land to
the City at no cost if the City would do the platting.
(h) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR
Mayor Ackland expressed concern regarding a newly opened
restaurant /bar which was not operating according to ordi-
nance requirements. He also questioned the name which
was different than the one given on the application.
9
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - APRIL 14, 1992 0
Following discussion, the motion was made by Councilman
Mlinar, seconded by Councilman Torgerson and unanimously
carried, to establish the date of April 17 for food to be
served or the operation would be shut down.
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion was made by Councilman Torgerson, seconded by
Councilman Mlinar and unanimously carried, to approve the
claims and authorize payment from appropriate funds.
/ / Ww W
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at
10:50 P.M.
i
•
10
MARCH 1992
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORTS
MARCH 1992
27,813.00
YOUTH CENTER - "DRY DOCK"
27.6%
OPERATING SUPPLIES
�EVENUE REPORT
CURRENT
YEAR TO
3,554.91
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
1,844.12
MARCH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
MEMBERSHIPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ERR
ADMISSIONS
68.00
283.00
863.00
580.00
32.8%
VIDEO GAMES
0.00
0.00
800.00
800.00
0.0%
POP
180.25
598.22
1,600.00
1,001.78
37.4%
CANDY
115.15
248.90
1,000.00
751.10
24.9%
CHIPS, ETC.
241.49
368.00
3,400.00
3,032.00
10.8%
INTEREST
144.05
144.05
500.00
355.95
28.8%
BLDG RENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FUND RAISERS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
0.00
29,250.00
41,900.00
12,650.00
69.8%
TOTAL
748.94
30,892.17
50,063.00
19,170.83
61.7%
EXPENSE REPORT
PERSONEL SERVICES
2,214.53
7,666.58
27,813.00
20,146.42
27.6%
OPERATING SUPPLIES
372.63
1,345.09
4,900.00
3,554.91
27.5%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
1,844.12
4,889.43
11,600.00
6,710.57
42.2%
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
0.00
500.00
500.00
0.0%
OUTLAY
750.00
3,865.83
5,250.00
1,384.17
• CAPITAL
TOTAL
5,181.28
17,766.93
50,063.00
32,296.07
35.5%
YOUTHCTR
ATTENDANCE
Y.T.D
21 DATES 372 871
•
. l A. (2)
MARCH 1992
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL FUND
•
TAXES
LICENSES
PERMITS AND FEES
INTER - GOVERNMENT REVENUE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
FINES & FORFEITS
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS
REVENUE FOR OTHER AGENCIES
TOTAL
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERAL FUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
CITY ADM. /CITY CLERK
ELECTIONS
FINANCE
MOTOR VEHICLE
ASSESSING
LEGAL
NNING
Y HALL
RECREATION BUILDING
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
BUILDING INSPECTION
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
SAFETY COUNCIL
FIRE MARSHALL
ENGINEERING
STREETS & ALLEYS
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
LIBRARY
SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
PARK /REC. ADMIN.
RECREATION
CIVIC ARENA
PARK DEPARTMENT
CEMETERY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEBT SERVICE
AIRPORT
TRANSIT
ENERGY COUNCIL
C.D.P. COORDINATRO
ALLOCATED
TOTAL
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL
1992
CURRENT YEAR TO
MARCH DATE ACTUAL
0.00
7,478.09
6,340.00
10,679.00
26,803.93
48,408.44
0.00
34,472.28
34,081.48
88,328.39
3,624.83
7,260.64
18,758.78
41,768.80
103,750.00
106,552.00
(1,366.11)
58.18
STATEMENTS MARCH 1992
ADOPTED BALANCE PERCENTAGE
BUDGET REMAINING USED
1,804,470.00
22,645.00
122,400.00
1,328,208.00
697,348.00
50,800.00
134,195.00
517,000.00
250.00
191,992.91 345,005.82 4,677,316.00 4,332,310.18
2,936.95
10,317.19
13,192.16
48,470.44
1,418.84
2,719.71
15,222.85
72,151.33
6,607.06
24,190.92
0.00
0.00
3,347.00
9,941.60
210.10
539.60
3,038.82
11,572.64
1,631.98
6,532.67
77,537.32
268,945.89
13,295.32
27,115.77
2,685.78
8,998.46
7,009.44
25,388.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,024.96
13,721.37
18,374.12
65,229.07
24,556.22
88,034.66
5,485.76
17,911.38
918.96
18,788.75
5,930.24
20,305.13
9,288.61
29,220.01
4,983.26
22,132.50
18,020.82
54,866.59
27,603.67
98,004.04
2,958.92
11,825.86
2,458.48
8,553.08
700.00
2,100.00
2,846.15
17,892.39
8,112.71
30,459.73
0.00
0.00
16,038.23
96,079.17
21,662.84
92,867.54
0.00
322,097.57
1,204,875.62
49,520.00
170,428.00
10,400.00
258,629.00
75,027.00
22,532.00
43,800.00
7,450.00
47,626.00
61,513.00
1,096,460.00
142,789.00
34,686.00
92,817.00
1,750.00
250.00
51,335.00
256,713.00
431,035.00
77,200.00
78,069.00
93,196.00
113,845.00
161,351.00
126,967.00
463,829.00
63,412.00
33,580.00
43,235.00
212,026.00
115,074.00
50.00
41,129.00
392,748.00
1,796,991.91
11,966.00
73,991.56
1,293,735.72
609,019.61
43,539.36
92,426.20
410,448.00
191.82
39,202.81
121,957.56
7,680.29
186,477.67
50,836.08
22,532.00
33,858.40
6,910.40
36,053.36
54,980.33
827,514.11
115,673.23
25,687.54
67,428.87
1,750.00
250.00
37,613.63
191,483.93
343,000.34
59,288.62
59,280.25
72,890.87
84,624.99
139,218.50
72,100.41
365,824.96
51,586.14
25,026.92
41,135.00
194,133.61
84,614.27
50.00
(54,950.17)
299,880.46
4,870,471.00 3,665,595.38 24.7"
MARCH 1992
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT -
1992
MARCH 1992
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
0.00
0.00
RFfUE REPORT - LIQUOR FUND
CURRENT
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
PERCENTAGE
531,800.00
MARCH
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
USED
LIQUOR SALES
34,352.87
104,381.58
460,000.00
355,618.42
22.7%
WINE SALES
7,909.03
24,690.98
135,000.00
110,309.02
18.3%
BEER SALES
54,477.85
159,073.99
710,000.00
550,926.01
22.4%
BEER DEPOSITS
(9.60)
(114.69)
0.00
114.69
6,337.11
MISC. SALES
4,124.45
10,667.34
45,000.00
34,332.66
20,812.69
INTEREST
444.57
3,033.43
10,500.00
7,466.57
28.9%
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
743.50
CASH DISCOUNTS
(563.92)
(1,136.81)
(1,500.00)
(363.19)
7,796.67
TOTAL
100,735.25
300,595.82
1,359,000.00
1,058,404.18
22.1%
EXPENSE REPORT
2,156,003.54
25.4%
LIQUOR FUND
PERSONEL SERVICES
10,111.88
36,504.68
132,748.00
96,243.32
27.5%
SUPPLIES, REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
72.19
402.41
3,350.00
2,947.59
12.0%
OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES
4,311.95
7,220.97
38,600.00
31,379.03
18.7%
MISCELLANEOUS
50.00
355.00
8,800.00
8,445.00
4.0%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
0.00
0.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
0.0%
TRANSFERS
0.00
0.00
120,000.00
120,000.00
0.0%
COST OF SALES
85,405.74
245,022.90
1,026,776.00
781,753.10
23.9%
0W
0.00
0.00
4,500.00
4,500.00
0,0%
TOTAL
99,951.76
289,505.96
1,335,774.00
1,046,268.04
21.7%
REVENUE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
FEDERAL GRANTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0%
WATER SALES
47,855.76
118,727.14
531,800.00
413,072.86
22.3%
WATER METER SALES
315.00
1,405.00
8,000.00
6,595.00
17.6%
REFUSE SERVICES
63,306.60
161,607.37
666,000.00
504,392.63
24.3%
REFUSE SURCHARGE
5,277.36
13,459.96
0.00
(13,459.96)
SEWER SERVICES
149,095.35
382,261.02
1,504,000.00
1,121,738.98
25.4%
PENALTY CHARGES
1,104.56
6,337.11
15,000.00
8,662.89
0.0%
INTEREST EARNED
11,293.37
20,812.69
160,000.00
139,187.31
13.0%
S C 0 R E
20,646.00
0.00
(20,646.00)
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
107.00
743.50
3,000.00
2,256.50
0.0%
OTHER
71.35
7,796.67
2,000.00
(5,796.67)
389.8%
TOTAL
278,426.35
733,796.46
2,869,800.00
2,156,003.54
25.4%
EXPENSE REPORT - WATER
SEWER /FUND
D` SE 67,269.51 197,705.59 774,816.00 577,110.41 25.5%
R 134,350.20 200,925.73 760,750.00 559,824.27 26.4%
SEWER 44,629.02 227,622.07 2,014,561.00 1,786,938.93 11.3%
TOTAL 246,248.73 626,253.39 3,550,127.00 2,923,873.61 17.6%
• SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES
FEBRUARY 13, 1992
Board Members Present: Mildred Jensen, Ruby Krueger, Lloyd Mueller,
eelia Zeimer, Arne Heil, X- Officio - Arnold
Rotzein.
Staff Members Present: Barb Haugen, Ruby Hanner
Chair Mildred Jensen called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m.
Minutes were approved as read. Arnold Rotzein reported on the Board's
checking account.
A variety of fund raising projects were discussed: card recycling,
spring dinner, bake sale. A sub - committee including Barb Haugen, Ruby
Krueger and Lloyd Mueller was designated to develop plans for a spring
fund raising dinner. Barb was also directed to find out about hot dog
sales at Cashwise. Staff will be preparing for 1992 concession stand
next month. It was suggested to find out more about the summer band
concerts. The Board was unanimous in deciding against a spring bake sale.
A progress report was given on the Senior Transportation Program,
currently ticket distribution is on schedule. The Center anticipates
• maintaining a balanced program in regard to funding.
Barb Haugen reported that the Elder Mentor Program is off to a solid
start. The school system is slow with their requests, however, a few very
successful programs have taken place and have created a lot of positive
interest.
The Board will be deciding on a fund raising goal to reach for 1992
and will make efforts to create more awareness by the community towards
the building fund.
Staff reported on upcoming tours, programs and activities. The Board
will be touring Summit Center in Mankato.
Meeting was adjourned at 11 a.m.
•
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 17, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at
7,30 p.m. with the following members present, E1Roy Dobratz, Dean
Wood, Roland Ebent, Craig Lenz, Bill Craig, Tom Lyke (7,4o p.m.)
and Chairman Gruett. Also Present, Gary Plotz, City
Administrator, John Rodeberg, City Engineer and Jim Harka, Building
Official.
2. MINUTES
Hr. Craig made a motion to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting dated Tuesday, February 18, 1992. Seconded by Hr. Wood the
motion carried unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
• (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY FRANCIS CONDON ON HWY 15 N FOR MINI- STORAGE
City Administrator Gary Plotz explained the staff
recommendation to withdraw the request if Hr. Condon does
not provide more information by the end of March for the
April meeting.
Mr. Craig moved to continue the hearing to the April
meeting, seconded by Hr. Lenz the motion carried
unanimously.
(b &c) CONSIDERATION OF VARIANCE AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUESTED BY DWIGHT BORDSON FOR ADDITION TO NON-
CONFORMING HOUSE
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7,35 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4348 and #4349 as published in
the Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a request for
a variance and conditional use permit to allow for the
construction of an addition unto a non - conforming house
located at 56 Grove St.
• Hr. Dwight Bordson explained his request and stated his
hardship as the need for additional space in the kitchen
and back entry way.
There was discussion on the sketch of the home and the
two additions proposed.
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 17, 1992
City Engineer John Rodeberg, stated the neighboring home •
is set back 20 to 30'. Discussion followed on the
established setback.
Hr. Lenz moved to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Wood
the hearing closed at 742 p.m. Hr. Craig made a motion
to approve the variance, seconded by Hr. Wood, and the
conditional use permit for both additions, seconded by
Hr. Dobratz, the motions carried unanimously.
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY JEFF
HUNSELL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CAR WASH ON HWY 7 WEST
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 7144 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4350 as published 'in the
Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The request
is for the purpose of considering a request to construct
a car wash located on Hwy 7 W and Florida.
City Administrator Plotz commented on the proposal and
the staff recommendation for a detailed site plan or
continue to the April meeting. He presented Hr. Richard
Danielson's, neighboring property owner, objections and
concerns with the request.
Hr. Gary Wurdell, caretaker of a neighboring 4 -plex on •
Florida St., stated he and the owner had no objection to
the car wash but have concerns with an entrance being
placed on Florida St. He suggested that the dance studio
access be the same as the car wash onto Hwy 7 West.
There was discussion on Florida Street being a narrow
street and possible assessment costs.
Hr. Lenz moved to defer the request to the April meeting,
seconded by Hr. Dobratz the motion carried unanimously.
(e)' CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF ADDITION OF SHORELAND
ORDINANCE TO ZONING ORDINANCE
Chairman Craig opened the hearing at 8t10 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4351 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Tuesday, March 5, 1992. The request
is for the purpose of considering the adoption of the
Shoreland Ordinance as an addition to the Zoning
Ordinance.
City Administrator Plotz explained the purpose of the
2
•
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COHHISSION MINUTES
• MARCH 17, 1992
public hearing at the Planning Commission meeting and
staff is following the model provided by the state.
City Engineer Rodeberg explained the package from the
state is mandated but the city staff deleted the portions
not relevant to the City of Hutchinson. He stated the
State deadline was February 1, 1992. The people most
affected are the residents of the city with septic tanks.
Those septic systems will have to be recertified.
Building Official Harka commented on Section 6.3
regarding nonconforming sewage treatment systems.
Hr. Wood moved to close the hearing, seconded by Hr. Lyke
the hearing closed at 8:33 p.m. Hr. Lenz made a motion
to approve the Shoreland Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Wood
the motion carried unanimously.
4. NEW BUSINESS
(a) DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES TO BE PRESENTED BY
JOHN RODEBERG
. City Engineer John Rodeberg commented on several rezoning
areas within the city. He explained the Special
Protection District to protect environmentally sensitive
areas. The park areas are to be protected. It does not
change anything these are not buildable lots.
Hr. Rodeberg explained the area of the Festival Food
store should be rezoned C -3. He stated that I -2 or Heavy
Industrial should be were the grain elevators are and
along Hwy 22 for Municipal uses. The new County
Fairgrounds were annexed into the city as R -1 and should
by rezoned I -1 (Light Industrial).
(b) COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
Building Official Jim Marks presented the proposed city
hall plan.
5. OLD BUSINESS
NONE
6. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
9,15 P.M.
3
0
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, March 24, 1992
1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Clint Gruett at
5:00 p.m. with the following members present: E1Roy Dobratz, Dean
Wood, Roland Ebent, Craig Lenz, Tom Lyke and Chairman Gruett.
Absent, Bill Craig Also Present: John Rodeberg, City Engineer and
Jim Marka, Building Official.
2. PUBLIC HEARINGS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY
SIMONSON'S LUMBER CO. FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORAGE AND
LEAN -TO TYPE BUILDING
Chairman Gruett opened the hearing at 5 :00 p.m. with the
reading of publication #4355 as published in the
Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, March 12, 1992. The
request is for the purpose of considering a request by
• Simonson's Lumber to construct a 36' x 60' storage
building with at 20' x 60' lean -to west of the present
building located in an IC -1 District located at 295 1st
Ave NE.
City Engineer John Rodeberg explained reason for the
special meeting in regard to Phase II for Simonson's
Lumber to provide construction of a storage shed and the
floor elevation is to be 4' above the existing ground to
meet DNR standards. He commented on the staff
recommendations discussing access, overhead door and
elevation.
Hr. Dave McGee, Simmonson's, presented an elevation and
sketch of the proposed building. He stated they would
rather only raise the building 2' as opposed to 4' if
possible. Hr. Rodeberg stated the elevation is mandated
by the DNR and the city can not deviate from that for
insurance purposes.
Discussion followed on flood proofing, flood way and
elevations of street and buildings.
A motion was made by Mr. Lenz to close the hearing,
seconded by Hr. Wood the hearing closed at 5:1S p.m.
• Hr. Lenz made a motion to recommend approval of the
request and sited staff recommendations of elevation of
the finished floor being 1 foot higher than the 100 year
1
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 24, 1992 •
flood level and DNR approval, no off - loading from the
street right -of -way, address parking and move cold
storage overhead door to the west side of structure.
Seconded by Hr. Lyke who noted the gas service is to be
moved also the motion carried unanimously.
3. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at
5x30 p.m.
•
•
2
•-)
i
Made: Jim Faber seconded by: Joe Dooley
Passed: unaminously
Hutchinson City Airport Commission
Meeting Notes 2 March 92
Meeting called to order 8:10 PM by Dave Skaar
Members Present:
Joe Dooley, Jim Faber, Dave Skaar, Paul Acklund,
John Rodeberg, Doug Meier and Dennis Kahl
Additional: Bernie Knutson, Tom Parker
TKDA - R. Strege and J. Peterson
Motion:
Investigate private or city municipal funding and proceed
with project at new costs.
Motion:
Seek additional funding for airport project.
Made: Joe Dooley seconded by: Dennis Kahl
Passed: unaminously
Next meeting
30 March 92 8:OOPM
Motion:
To adjourn
Made: Dennis Kahl seconded by: Mark Lopac
passed 9:10 PM
MINUTES
Parks A Recreation Board
February 26, 1992
Members present were Mike Schall, Mike Cannon, John Mlinar and J.P. Auer. Also
present were Dolf Moon, John Arlt and Karen McKay.
The Minutes dated January 29, 1992 were approved with the addition of a '
clarification in the subdivision ordinance item. Mike Cannon made a motion to
approve the minutes, and John Mlinar seconded the motion. The board
unanimously agreed.
NEW BUSINESS
Annual Report - The board received a copy of the 1991 -92 Annual Report, it can
be used as a guildline for planning the budget and labor.
Subdivison Ordinance - The ordinance has been forwarded to Barry Anderson, the
City Attorney, to put together the proper verbage, and continue work on
changes int he percentages or formula. It is agree that the ordinance should
be simplistic. Dolf surveyed other cities, and their ordinances vary.
Park Adoption - Dolf told the board that there is a need for a committment
• for the future from the groups adopting parks. The inactive groups will be
contacted. Groups such as the Jaycees and Optimists have funded repairs
and replacements along with the addition of picnic tables in their
respective parks.
NEW BUSINE
L.C_M_R. Proposal/Review - The Board received and reviewed a copy of the three
grant proposals submitted to the legislative Committee on Minnesota's Resources
(L.C.M.R.). The projects included clean up and development of the Crow River,
the development of an urban fishing pier in the Tartan Park area, and the
development of Rotary Park as a barrier free area. If the grants are funded,
more specific paper work will be completed.
Donations - The Lions Club will be funding the second phase of their park
adoption in 1992 which will include a mini shelter and a mini playground with a
swing. The A.F.S. will be sponsor the installation of a foot bridge connecting
the Luce Line Trail and their park, they will continue to plant trees and
install plaques. A large boulder is in place for a sign.
Citizens Bank and Firstate Federal Savings and Loan donated counters,
furniture, kitchen utensils, booths and tables for the recently relocated Dry
Dock.
Firstate Federal also continues to sponsor the semi annual brochure, the
• monthly Senior Newsletter, and there is one year of planting in Library Square
before it is complete.
4 - I-q - (
MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Board
February 26, 1992
Page two
Dry Dock Cpen House - An open house is scheduled for the Dry Dock on Thursday,
March 5th. The public will be able to see the new location and equipment.
Special events will continue to be scheduled at various locations to
promote larger group activities.
The monthly rent is $750 with a six month agreement, then the lease will be
renogotiated for a 6 -12 month rental period.
N.Y_S_C_A. - National Youth Sports Coaches Association is run through the
Minnesota Recreation & Park Association. They train and certify coaches, and
provide insurance coverage on those coaches. John Arlt is a certified
clinician with N.Y.S.C.A. The program has been well received in many
communities in the United States. After a brief discussion, J.P. Auer made a
motion that the board support the concept of using national standards for
coaches to implement in youth sports and sports related programs. Mike Schall
seconded the motion, and the board unanimously agreed.
Partners i n Friendship - John Mlinar has been contacted by Partners in
Friendship. They are requesting funding of $500,000 for a program that
provides support for families. Right now they are working with volunteer help.
Tennis Court Repairs - The Tennis Association is requesting that an overlay be
Put on the tennis courts at Park Elementary. The cost would be $4,000, if
done, a major repair could be put off for 5 -10 years. This item was tabled at
the last City Council meeting.
Adjo - The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. by a motion made by John
Mlinar, and seconded by J.P. Auer; the board unanimously agreed.
klm
0
•
A
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
March 31, 1992
Amount
300,000.00
550,000.00
500,000.00
373,500.00
310,758.20
400,000.00
500,000.00
1,150,000.00
600,000.00
300,000.00
650,000.00
127,000.00
$5,961,258.20
S
11
4-A ( 6)
Date
Date
Interest
Of
Of
Institution
Description
Rate-
Purchase
Maturity
---------------------------
Firstate
42- 117168 -5
5.40%
11/14/91
4/16/92
Firstate
42- 120479 -1
5.35%
12/12/91
6/11/92
Firstate
017020942.6
5.35%
12/12/91
7/11/92
TREAS BONDS
644136
7.18%
12/12/91
2/15/2001
TREAS BONDS
644137
7.13%
12/12/91
10/15/98
Firstate
41- 121498 -0
4.30%
12/31/91
4/15/92
Firstate
41- 1214999 -8
4.60%
12/31/91
12/30/92
Firstate
42- 117375 -6
4.50%
1/16/92
4/30/92
Firstate
42- 118337 -5
4.20%
3/12/92
5/14/92
•
5/28/92
Firstate
42- 120527 -7
4.50%
1/16/92
Firstate
5017019886
4.38%
3/26/92
4/30/92
Firstate
41- 121442 -8
5.35%
2/13/91
4/16/92
Amount
300,000.00
550,000.00
500,000.00
373,500.00
310,758.20
400,000.00
500,000.00
1,150,000.00
600,000.00
300,000.00
650,000.00
127,000.00
$5,961,258.20
S
11
4-A ( 6)
i
Non- intoxicating on -sale and off -sate beer licenses to be acted on by City Council,
April 28, 1992:
I
1992
NON - INTOXICATING ON -SALE LIQUOR $350.00
Crow River Country Club
Godfather's Pizza
Gold Coin
Pizza Hut
Little Crow Bowling Lanes
* J's Sports Bar (new applicant)
_e�giw Y-B= -(Will no longer be selling beer on Sundays)
Lamplighters Lounge II (new applicant) -
NON- INTOXICATING OFF -SALE $200.00
Cash Wise Foods
Erickson Freedom Station Hwy 7
Hwy 15
George's Food & Fuel
• Citgo- Quikmart
Southtown Hobil
Tom Thumb Food Harket
SuperAmerica -
* There may be discussion of this license on another agenda item.
NOTE: The Underground Bar and Grill will no longer be selling beer on Sundays.
rZ -L�-.*>.
i
H E H O R A N D U H
April 21, 1992
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bonnie Baumetz, License Secretary
SUBJECT: NON - INTOXICATING ON AND OFF SALE LICENSES
Police Chief Steve Hadson has signed and approved the non -
intoxicating licenses for the establishments listed in the
attachment except for the new license requested by Steve Picha at
J's Sports Bar. •
40
APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT
•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: J/- /o- z
Approved:
1. Name of Organization r �(y�9 /�L cc..r, \ L� Q(Q
2. Address of Organization 35 3 S 1: Phone 587 X54
3. Authorized Officer's Name q
4- Officer's Address �jJ 3 c Phone $ 8
5. Parade Chairman � .�, {, angtia
6. Parade Chairman's Address �l30 �� n.oc —phone
7.
Date of Parad I q r19
Assembly Time r), ' p 0 0
8.
Location
and Description of Assembly Area Rq
�� n
, �, ,� JQoa S q
,� ,�J(
9.
Starting
Time of Parade `jL;,S Estimated
Time of Termination /o:U 0 - /o:i5
Time
10.
Starting
Point of Parade , co, i
O - L - ,
11.
Route of
p _
�
Parade Travel o y I - ��
�
�ilu ..vl dF
E
12. Termination Point of Pa
13. Approximate Number of Units, '- �'^ and Vehicles which will constitute Parade with
Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles cxtt ,,4 a.p c".3o�l cn-
14. Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units
15. Maximum Length of Parade
16. Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade MPE
17. Portion of Street Width Traversed LFA Yq,
Approved this [Q day of 19 9 Z upon compliance with the following terms
and conditions —7 ——
Chief of
,11-F. <2�
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
City Hall
37 Washington Ave. W.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
APPLICATION FOR PARADE PERMIT
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: 41- 10 -ftL
Approved:
1. Name of Organization �IWh DT DI'(YUS - Ce KJf6 l kl1 bf Vl
2. Address of Organization LL S� >1(x�,Q Ufl t_ Nl , 6U I tf I L Phone (pl LI G JL'l 1-(D
5 IpuO k M Fl SZo3D1
3. Authorized Officer's Name 7iVl}syr l �1
4:< Officer's Address ZZ,"A (1( (1v1" Phone 412 -1 52, -US7G
5. Parade Chairman 1 6y K-
, vv
6. Parade Chairman's Address 07P-M6 Pnt e N0. c l,lILF11O1t�Sillrinone (1��Z5� �D
7. Date of Parade S ,lnr. aLi M QLII 1902- Assembly Time jL 0J
8. Location and Description of Assembly Area W ')p R cit - f r PC&Y
9. Starting Time of Parade j A D t� Estimated Time of Termination
10. S
Starting P
Point o
of Parade W
WjjQ ±
± r
K Yf r�
11. R
Route of P
Parade T
Travel W R
RPIAYL n
r K�Vt K
3 { ,<b3?6l J
JD PCLI1 S
St +
+Ckaf
+Tl
y �L�
12. Termination Pbint of
VVG�i �1
13. Approximate Number of Units, Animals and Vehicles which will constitute
Type and Description of Animals and Vehicles 3P 1/f - m4 V
1 j rtGl,� W 0.1, -k' r r�
al VI - A -Tl to t u v�cL
14.
Maximum Interval of Space to be Maintained Between Units
15. Maximum Length of Parade
16. Minimum and Maximum Speed of Parade
17. Portion of Street Width Traversed
K
---- - - - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — --
Approved day of — ( 197i upon compliance with the following terms
and conditions
MWE
APR 1S92
m �=� A
8Y a
/ UkR��
Chief of
Tarade v
Yf;
tSh rV-
A to U
A [JUA
VAIaLIA/Ol
Vl
%'ULU=CA l:
A
. _ �
1
Ju
A
61 CROW RIVER
I
COUNTRY CLUB
Hutchinson,
MN
I,
[CON
AVE
fnaRlmaw
s
AO
CD
� a
6 °
1 IN A,
AV
I
-
-{
72
. MA
1
F0 TN Ar
g
I
!
12
N AV
AT
I
1
LA
H IV
F
5
CdT RY CLUB
TERRACE
I
1
1
`"
i
_
MOBILE HOME
r
.� 27 I
3
�p
PARK
_
•
•
r
AT(�
XIL
°`
AK
S ToCUngh
r
AUTN®
- A I
110 N
47 ri
A .I
1
t
�� TO
Ikhliea
TAA1
WEST RIVER J
1 ; ,
~
FIN
V X
A
1
E —•�"
PARK
G �
`�
XIXGF011
YF N 1
'
N AV
LA' R " 45
l
Ole,
.e 1 r� � r Y Av'
CROW *
M Y INf
''�•
[1°
L T — a S
4
�.
Yr F
+ AVE S 4
TO
.�
31
SCCOYO
IS V
i A HIND AVE N
IN
_
A
49 THI
O AV S
fl?* 42 SCHOOL
°
n
i
F
O �
4•N
4
ECOLO -Y PARK
G
RFN A'
O t a 4
LC
AVE 14'
AVE -
!N
uERL N
F F f FTH AVE
4
A,
F
L`
AA
K
FIAIA
W
36 ..
4 Ga1ff °
. VE
`
f?
11
_
MI L
x f
W
GO
MiL
�t
s rAF�
M H
-- J
JY
t
IM A, C IY
MO 1
VC YWA f A
O
AA
CRAIG
v[ 3
-
/ NEAL A
f A 1Y°
OAKLAND i
LLMEIERY
2
67
'I 511 Aw. N.W.... a 2
rl 4 clrr.w
�- •— I I
ov_ IS
i
" 7
W A
,
Slh Ave. S.E.....�. H A
R 11
Ali LP
FW FA 4
a o,w
FRf
[n0N AVE
_.
A to U
A [JUA
VAIaLIA/Ol
Vl
%'ULU=CA l:
A
. _ �
F AY
Ju
A
TO
�
rcHE --- -•
--
. _ �
F AY
Ju
b
[CON
AVE
AO
CD
_
H M
AV
-
-{
C
I
F0 TN Ar
AT
H IV
S E
Ae
V CO UNTYF�
Ole,
4
.�
0
Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
P.O. Box 624
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
2 d5 7 9�
Mr. Gary Plotz
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue
Hutchinson, MN. 55350
April 3, 1992 �� p}
N �1G1.1'.WED
r, BY
EZ
RE: Jaycee Water Carnival
Dear Gary:
It is that time of the year again to prepare for the
annual Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival. As you know, this will
be our 50th Water Carnival Celebration. In that regard, we would
request that permits be issued for the 1992 Water Carnival as
• follows:
1. Close Street and Issue Parade Permit for Kiddie Day
Parade on Saturday, June 20th from 12 noon until 1:30
p.m. The same route will be used this year, starting
at the South side of Park Towers and continuing around
South Park in a clockwise direction to Glen Street.
2. Close Street and Issue Parade Permit for Grande Day
Parade on Sunday, June 21st, from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. Again, the same route will be used this year
starting at Lake Street, continue down Second Avenue
to Franklin Street, then south on Franklin Street to
Linden Avenue.
3. Issue Permit for the Carnival Midway Show June 17th -
21st at West River Park. The Park and Rec Board has
been asked to approve this location again for this year.
An alternative site can be set for Optimist Park park-
ing lot if we have a wet season again this year, or
another sight agreeable with the Park and Rec Board.
4. Issue Permit to Sell Food at the Waterski Show and Mud
Volleyball Tournament on Sunday, June 21st at West
River Park and Les Kouba Park.
• 5. Issue Permit for Fireworks Display on Sunday, June 21st
at approximately 10:00 p.m. at Les Kouba Point. We
will arrange to have the Fire Department stand by if
any assistance is needed.
4'A-�B'
Gary Plotz
Page 2
0
April 3, 1992
6. Mini - Biffs. In the past, the City has taken care of
the Mini - Biffs needed for the weekend. We appreciate
your assistance with this matter.
7. A non - intoxicating liquor license for liquor sales on
the following days: Thursday evening, June 18th, at
West River Park; Saturday evening, June 20th at the
Civic Arena; and, Sunday afternoon, June 21st at Les
Kouba Park. We would also like to sell set -ups at
the Civic Arena and have attendees bring their own
bottles. The Jaycees would appreciate waiver of any
license fees.
The Jaycees, as a non - profit organization, would appre-
ciate waiver of permit fees and rentals to help defray our
expenses. We appreciate all the help and assistance we receive
from the City. This community celebration could not be run with-
out your help.
If you have any questions concerning any of these events, •
please don't hesitate to contact me at 587 -2272.
Very truly yours,
David K. Westlund
Commodore
DKW:lf
A
Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
P.O. Box 624
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
2/5 4 9
April 3, 1992
Mayor Paul Ackland
Hutchinson City Council
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, MN. 55350
ZZ
RE: Hutchinson Jaycee Water Carnival
Dear Mayor Ackland and City Council Member:
•
The Hutchinson Jaycees are well into the planning
stages for the 1992 Water Carnival, it will be our 50th Water
Carnival Celebration. This City wide event has enjoyed wonder-
ful support from the City and its residents. Last Fall Tim
Ulrich and I made a request for a donation from the City of
Hutchinson in the amount of $2,000 to help defray expenses on
sponsored community events. This amount is $800 higher than
prior years. This differance will help offset additional ex-
penses for this anniversary celebration.
The Jaycees appreciate the difficult decisions that
the Council has in allocating its budget, especially in light
of the proposed cuts in State funds. However, the Jaycees do
feel that this City wide event is a mainstay of the community
and surrounding area. The Jaycees sincerely hope that the
Council will continue to view the Water Carnival as a valuable
celebration for the City.
Since this is our 50th annual celebration, we are
planning some exciting additions this year. We are bringing back
past Royalty. Our parade is being expanded, (we already have
10 High School bands confirmed). We are doubling the size of our
fireworks display. There will also be an airshow before the boat
parade on Thursday night. These changes and others will make
this year special.
•
APP 1992
RECEDED
� -c
Mayor Paul Ackland Page 2 April 3, 1992
Hutchinson City Council
The Jaycees truely appreciate all of the assis-
tance and support that the Water Carnival receives from the
City of Hutchinson. Without the aid of the City staff, this
Community celebration could not be held.
Please let me know when the Water Carnival items are
on the City Council agenda. I will plan to attend along with
the Vice Commodore, Tim Ulrich to discuss this matter and to
answer any questions.
Thank you very much for your assistance and
consideration.
Very truly yours,
David K. Westlund
Commodore
DKW:If
0
— - s.
C
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jim Marka, Building Official
Dolf Moon, Park and Recreation Director
DATE: April 21, 1992
RE: Proposed Revision to Public Site and Open Space Dedication
•
•
The attached language for park land dedication has been
reviewed and approved by both the Park Board and Planning
Commission, excluding the precentage and dollar figures.
As directed by the City Council and after a series of
meetings with Alderman Erickson, the attached proposal
is in final draft for your consideration
CC: Gar Plotz, City Administrator
AWATilyn Swanson - City Council Packet
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
A
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
REVISED DATE: April 1, 1992 •
Subd. 6. Public Site and Open Spaces. The following requirements
are applicable to all subdivisions within the jurisdiction of the Park
Board, Planning Commission and City Council.
A. In subdividing land or resubdividing an existing plat,
due cons iderat.ior) shall be. given to the subdivision and by the
Planning Committees upon review, to the dedication or reservation of
suitable sites for schools, conservation areas, or open spaces and
parks. Where a proposed public park, recreational area or open spaces,
as determined by the Comprehensive Plan, or the Planning Commission and
Council is located in whole or in part within a subdivision, the
subdivider shall dedicate such lands to the City; provided, however,
that the total dedication (exclusive of public streets, alleys, and
pedestrian ways, and exclusive of all other purchased sites such as
fire and police stations, water towers and treatment plants and sewer
lift stations), shall be consistent with the following requirements:
1. Residential Zoned Subdivisions. For land within a
residential zone, formulas for land dedications shall be as follows:
(a). Zoning Districts R -1. A land dedication of 7.5% •
of the undeveloped site or its fair market land
value.
(b). Zoning Districts R -2. A land dedication of 12%
of the undeveloped site or its fair market land
value.
(c). Zoning Districts R -3 and R-4. A land dedication
of 15% of the undeveloped site or its fair market
land value.
(d). Zoning District Commercial and I /CI a negotiated
percentage of land dedication of the undeveloped
site or its fair market land value.
(e). Business Park or Industrial Zoned Subdivision.
None required.
2. Infrastructure assessments costs incurred with any
of the land dedication above shall be calculated and levied against the
park or open space by lineal foot of frontage. In no case shall the
assessment cost levied againstt the park exceed 60% of the fair market
value of the land.
A
7- A,
3. For the purposes of this Subdivision, "fair market
land value" is defined as the market value of the land within such plat
or subdivision as of the date presented to the Council for preliminary
approval, as determined by the City Assessor or the sale price,
whichever is higher, in the same manner as they shall determine the
estimated market value of land for tax purposes, excluding from such
determination any value added to such land by improvements serving such
land, but including in such determination the highest and best force at
the time of the platting.
4. Payment in Lieu of Land Dedication. The City
shall have the option of requiring a cash contribution in lieu of the
land dedication set forth in item 1. Cash contribution shall be based
on the following schedule.
(a). Zoning District R -1. A cash contribution of $215
per unit.
(b). Zoning District R -2. A cash contribution of $175
per unit.
(c). Zoning District R -3 and R -4. A cash contribution
of $135 per unit.
(d). Zoning District Commerical and I /CI. A negotiated
cash contribution based on its fair market land
• value.
(e). Business Park or Industrial Zoned Subdivision.
None required.
5. Partial Dedication and Partial Payment. The City
may permit or require the subdivider to provide a partial dedication
and a partial payment in accordance with the requirments as set forth
above.
6. The cash and land dedication value set forth
above shall be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board on an annual
basis and a revised schedule, if any, shall be set forth by the
Council.
B. When structures are constructed on property which has
been previously platted and on which plat no park dedication on record
in cash or land was given to the City, a park dedication fee in
accordance with the schedules hereinafter set forth shall be paid at
the time of the Subdivision agreement or when the building permit is
issued. If the park dedication as indicated on record has been
previously satisfied at the time of platting in accordance with the
requirements then in existence, then no further fee shall be levied.
If a partial payment has been made, then the balance of the development
shall be charged the rate set forth in Item 1, above.
•
C. When the building permits are issued on property which
is not platted and is not required to be platted prior to receiving a
building permit, a fee shall be paid at the time of building permit •
issuance in accordance with the above schedule.
D. Sums of money so received by the City shall be placed
in a special account to be known as the Public Sites and Equipment
Fund and allocated by the Council solely for the acquisition of land
or purchase of equipment for public parks, recreation areas of open
spaces, development of existing parks and recreational areas, or debt
retirment in connection with the land or equipment previously acquired
for parks, recreational areas, or open areas.
E. Soil, Water and Wetland Conservation. Pursuant to
State Statute, the following may be required: The subdivider shall be
responsible for providing site development plans with provisions for
the control of drainage, erosion, siltation and wetlands restoration
if said plans are considered necessary by the City Engineer for the
purpose of soil, water and wetland conservation.
F. The Council, at its option, in high density zoning
districts, may require a developer to create a private entity to
maintain some form of on -site recreation for use by the site's
residents, specifically preschool children. This requirement may be
in addition to the dedication of land or cash for park or recreation
purposes. Reference Section 8.07 required play area of Hutchinson's
Zoning Ordinance.
Source: Ordinance No: is
Effective Date:
•
RESOLUTION N0. 9698
i REQUESTING Hn /DOT FOR COST PARTICIPATION ON T.H. NO. 22 IMPROVEMENTS
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 92 -05
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson proposes to make certain improvements on
a portion of Trunk Highway No. 22 located in the City of Hutchinson in McLeod
County, between Washington Avenue and Fair Avenue S.E., and
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson that the
State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, is requested to provide cost
participation for improvements on the aforesaid portion of Trunk Highway No.
22, consisting particularly of curb and gutter, sidewalk, storm sewer, and
roadway reconstruction and considered as construction and improvement of said
roadway.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that following approval by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation of plans and specifications for said improvements
on said trunk highway and before a contract is awarded for the construction of
said improvements, the Department of Transportation shall enter into an
agreement with the City of Hutchinson which shall provide that the Department
of Transportation shall pay its share of the cost of the requested
improvements as determined by the Department of Transportation in keeping with
its latest edition of Mn /DOT Directive - Basic Policies and Procedures,
Cooperative Construction Projects with Municipalities fa copy of which has
• been received from the Minnesota Department of Transportation's District
Engineer) and, that if the City of Hutchinson lets the construction contract,
the Departments of Transportation will deposit with the City of Hutchinson,
upon demand, after the execution of the agreement and before the start of
construction, a sum equal to an estimate of the Department of Transportation's
share as prepared by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April , 1992,
Mayor
City Administrator
C J
i
C
April 23, 1992
MEMO
TO: MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JOHN RODEBERG, STEVE MADSON, DOLF MOON, 8 KEN MERRILL -
WELLNESS COMMITTEE
SUBJECT: WELLNESS PROGRAM
The Wellness Committee has been meeting and proposed a list of
alternatives to a wellness program for City Employees. The
committee then meet with City Council representatives and employee
representatives. As a result of these meetings and an employee
survey the following is recommended for city council approval.
The committee recommends that the City enter into a wellness
• monitoring program with Hutchinson Community Hospital for all full
time employees. The program would be funded from revenues in the
self insurance fund which has accumulated due to interest earnings
and excess funds from previous years. We estimate a cost of $4,500
for the basic program before any additional classes or follow up.
The program would be evaluated on a periodic basis to insure
participation by employees and how effective the program is
performing. The purpose of the program is to keep people healthier
and aware of potential problems before these problems become more
serious.
We have attached a copy of the employee survey results as well as
information from Robyn Erickson, Director of Education and
Marketing, Hutchinson Community Hospital.
Robyn Erickson will be attending the meeting to explain the program
and alternatives to the program.
• City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
-Printed on recycled pnt•cr
10MIf
Hutchinson Community Hospital can provide a number of options for
you in determining an appropriate wellness program for the City •
of Hutchinson employees. Please consider the following in
choosing the option that best satisfies your needs.
AN EFFECTIVE WELLNESS PROGRAM SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING KEY
COMPONENTS.
B. Collection ion of Baseline DAta on Participants and Control Group
- Use of sick days
- Use of Health Care Insurance
- Incidence of tardiness
- Productivity
C. A Needp to determine the level and type of
interest /needs of prospective participants.
D. A com plete Health Riak Appraisal (HRA)
Any number of tools can be used. The best types include
height, weight, blood pressure, participant and family health
history, blood cholesterol level and environmental and
habitual risk factors. This HRA serves as a baseline to
measure effectiveness of participants' lifestyle changes and
the program itself. Each participant must be assured
confidentiality of the Health Risk Appraisal information.
Individual Consultation with a health professional to review
HRA results and provide insight into necessary lifestyle
changes to achieve wsllnesa.
F
LU
Follow un Prnaram to provide participants with effective
means /aesietance in lifestyle changes, i.e., quit smoking
classes, exercise programs, diet clubs, etc.
A continuing effort to promote healthy lifeetylea and
committment to the program at the employee's workplace
(Wellness Committee).
Eya,luationa at 1 year and 2 years (repeat HRA, height,
weight, blood presure) to provide participants with feedback
concerning lifestyle changes and measure effectiveness of
program.
Comparison of baseline data with current use statistics at
one and two year intervals to assess effectiveness of
program.
The following program is available for Components A -F.
•
P-A
Wellness Program - City of Hutchinson Page 2
1. A. *Collection of baseline data. This can be completed by
City of Hutchinson personnel /computer with the
assistance of Robyn Erickson.
B. deeds AnAcRamant done by Wellness Committee with
assistance of Robyn Erickson. COST
C. Health Ri.k Appraisal - "Health TracTH" by $8.00
Blue Cross and Blue Shield. Takes approximately
20 minutes to complete and is mailed to BC /BS.
Group reporting at no extra cost.
D. Total M ond Chemiat�ry (includes cholesterol level) $25.00
Performed by Hutchinson Community Hospital lab
on site.
E. 5 Loy2l Blood Cholesterol done by Hutchinson $10.00
Community Hospital lab. Drawn on site.
F. FollowIig Individual Cnnsultat. ion and referral $15.00
to appropriate classes - one half hour. Can be
done on site or at Hutchinson Community Hospital.
TOTAL $58.00
COMPONENT F: FOLLOW UP CL ASSES
Hutchinson Community Hospital has qualified personnel to
conduct /facilitate follow -up classes on stress, smoking,
exercise, diet, weight loss programs, safety and back care. The
cost for these classes and materials is proportionate to the
number of participants and class sessions.
(Also see attached listing of Health Related Classes.)
Promotion of the wellness effort can and should be accomplished
by a Wellness Committee comprised of City of Hutchinson
employees.
COMPONENT H:
Repeat HRA's and bloodwork should be completed at one year and
two Year intervals.
COMPONENT I: OVERALL PROGRAM RVALUATTON
Baseline data, ill time, use of insurance, etc., should be
compared at one year and two year intervals. This subsequent
data, again, can be collected by City of Hutchinson personnel or
Hutchinson Community Hospital (for a consultation fee).
r 1
LJ
Wellness Program - City of Hutchinson Page 9 9
The Hutchinson Community Hospital consultant, upon Obtaining data
will submit a comparative report, including a Group Health Risk
Profile and the impact of the Wellness Program on City of
Hutchinson at one year and two year intervals.
Respectfully submitted,
Robyn d. Eri kaon, RN
• Director of Education and Marketing
RGE:nla
0
• HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL /BURNS MANOR NURSING HOME
HEALTH RELATED CLASSES
Provided on a one -to -one basis through our Personal Nutrition
Counseling Program.
Cost: Weight Control and Three Month Weigh In $86.25
Weight Control only $34.50
Low Cholesterol /Low Salt Diet $34.50
Healthy thy Ra n HAbite
Seminars, group sessions on: Eating for a Healthy Heart,
Lowering Your Cholesterol, and How to Shop for Healthy Foods.
Customized to meet your organization's needs. Instructed by a
team of our Dietary Technicians.
Cost: $50.00 per hour
• Hutchinson Community Hospital's Mental Health Services has a
staff of Mental Health Therapists, Psychiatrists and Mental
Health Nurses who can tailor programs to meet your needs. Topics
include: stress and coping mechanisms, depression, eating
disorders, and chemical dependency. These can be offered as one
to two hour seminars. Individual referrals and counseling are
also available.
Cost: Dependent on Topic and Precentor $75.00 - $150.00 per hour
gesviratory Care / Quit Smoking Classes
Our Registered Respiratory Therapist can offer classes on Asthma,
Chronic Lung Problems and is a Freedom From Smoking facilitator.
Hutchinson Community Hospital also offers a program "21 Days to
Stop Smoking" developed with the American Cancer Society.
Cost: Classes $35.00 per hour
Freedom From Smoking $45.00 per person
21 Days to Stop Smoking $40.00 per person
Qther Health Related Topics
Hutchinson Community Hospital's Health Education Resource Center
employes four RN Health Educators who can speak on a variety of
• topics ranging from Cancer Prevention, Self- Breast Exam,
Teaticular Exam, First Aid /CPR, Hypertension and Healthy
Lifestyle Habits.
Cost: $35.00 per hour
David G. Rozzelle
General aarlml
April 21, 1992
��021222
G. Barry Anderson, Esq.
Arnold & McDowell
101 Park Place
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2563
/� Federal Expr
Dear Barry:
S
I am writing in follow -up to our meeting last Friday in Hutchinson in which we
discussed the issues of concern to the City and the Cable Advisory Committee. In
anticipation of the City Council Meeting of April 28, 1992, 1 would like to state the
position of D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. on the issues raised in the meeting.
1. HCVN Eauioment Fee In light of the voluntary nature of the
• $0.35 payment to HCVN by the subscribers, D.D. Cable Partners will
commit to collecting the fee for the City. As we discussed, this fee will
not constitute "gross revenues" for franchise fee purposes.
2. Coordinator Salary and Eauioment Charges D.D. Cable Partners
will, of course, continue to pay the $ 12,000 coordinator's salary and up
to $2,000 in equipment costs each year. 1 am aware of HCVN's desire
to increase these amounts, but as I stated at the meeting, changes in the
existing franchise agreement are more properly subjects to be discussed
during our renewal negotiations, which should begin shortly. On behalf
of D.D. Cable Partners, allow me to assure you that we are prepared to
enter into those negotiations as soon as we are through the franchise
transfer process.
3. Technical Audit Per our discussion with Mark, I am enclosing a
copy of the diligence form we completed for the Hutchinson system last
summer when we did our inspection. It appeared to me that a major
complaint concerned the quality of the upstream channel used to feed
Channel 10 to the headend. As I stated at the meeting, it is the
system's responsibility to deliver an acceptable signal to the headend.
We will undertake repairs to correct that problem. As for general
concerns about the system's technical state, the FC6 new technical
• standards require bi- annual proofs of performance which we will share
with the City. The new standards are tough. If the system meets them,
r ,
235 Montgomery, Suite 420 ■ San Francisco, CA 94104 ■ (415) 397 -4121 ■ FAX (415) 397 -3978
G. Barry Anderson, Esq.
April 21, 1992
Page 2
it will be in fine shape. I am hopeful sharing the test results will help
allay concerns over the system's general technical state.
4. Channel Offerings As you know, we met with the management
of the Appleton PBS station at City Hall following the cable meeting. It
appears that the station is located about 85 air miles from the cable
system headend. That is probably too far to receive an acceptable and
reliable signal for cable carriage. Nevertheless, we agreed to work
together to resolve the signal strength issue. Further, as I stated at the
meeting, the system will add Midwest Sports Channel jf a survey of the
subscribers supports the addition of this expensive basic service. As you
know, many Minnesota systems increased rates $1.50 to $2.00 per
month when MSC was added. While we may be able to absorb some of
the expense, it is likely that we too will have to adjust rates if MSC is
added. Our subscribers should know that in advance.
5. Service. As we explained at the meeting, as soon as the
transaction closes, D.D. Cable Partners will add a senior technician to
the area to focus on sweeping (balancing) the systems in the region.
The tech will also make certain that the system does not "leak" in the
aeronautical bands, which is prohibited by federal rule. The addition of
this technician will relieve the local technicians from these chores and
will give them more time to respond to trouble calls and focus on system
maintenance.
As I stated at our meeting, D.D. Cable Partners believes that the relationship
between the City and the cable operator must remain satisfactory to both sides in
order to work well. Accordingly, we will meet with the City at any time to discuss
any issue of concern, up to and including the renewal of the franchise. My staff and
I do only one thing -- we operate cable television systems and, as the Moss & Barnett
report concludes, we do a good job. We look forward to working with the City and
the Cable Advisory Committee to serve the citizens of Hutchinson.
I will see you on the 28th.
cc: John Brinker
Mark Machart
Alexandra Becker
Gary Nadolsky
Cordially,
4 David G. a le
Chief Executive Officer,
Cable Operations
40
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 5]3]0-2563
(612) 587 -7575
FA3 (612) 58T -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G BARRY AYDERSO.0
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Transfer of Cable Franchise
our File No. 3244 -92054
m COBSSSL
WILLIAM W. CAMSION
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
PAUL V.BEOICH
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL
5881 CEDAR LAE£ ROAD
MINNRAPOLIS,MINN'ESOTA 55416
1612) 545 -9000
MS TOLL FREE 500- 343 -4545
FAR(6121545 -1)93
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389 -2214
FAX (6121 389 -5306
DASTa n. A
ti
DO O
oA=Y a.>knowsv.
gI �
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
O. RABHT ANDEED(IN'
STEVEN S. HOGE
LIIBA S. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEOOSMANN
PAIIL D. DOVE"
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT
JAMES U 1.ZY
HICRARD O. WOEE
TIMOTHY W, FAFINSEI
MARY E. HORROCES
CATHRYN D. REBER
April 20, 1992
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARE PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 5]3]0-2563
(612) 587 -7575
FA3 (612) 58T -4096
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G BARRY AYDERSO.0
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
Re: Transfer of Cable Franchise
our File No. 3244 -92054
m COBSSSL
WILLIAM W. CAMSION
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
PAUL V.BEOICH
CHARLES R.CARMICHAEL
5881 CEDAR LAE£ ROAD
MINNRAPOLIS,MINN'ESOTA 55416
1612) 545 -9000
MS TOLL FREE 500- 343 -4545
FAR(6121545 -1)93
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389 -2214
FAX (6121 389 -5306
Dear Gary:
• This letter is with regard to the approval of the transfer of the
franchise for the provision of cable television services presently
held by Star Cable Systems.
I an enclosing the following which should be included in the next
Council packet:
1. A copy of the description of the key individuals of D.D.
Cable Partners;
2. A copy of the interview with David G. Rozzelle, which
interview was prepared by the law firm of Moss & Barnett.
This interview gives some insight into the plans for D.D.
Cable Partners.
3. A copy of interviews with Cable System Administrators.
4. The financial qualifications of the proposed franchisee.
5. A Notice of Public Hearing which should be approved by
the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City
Council meeting.
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION l / �f��(
"CERTIFIED AS A BEAL PROPERTY LAB SPECIALIST BY TH£ MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION l '�`/^'✓�)`�
r
ti
gI �
Dear Gary:
• This letter is with regard to the approval of the transfer of the
franchise for the provision of cable television services presently
held by Star Cable Systems.
I an enclosing the following which should be included in the next
Council packet:
1. A copy of the description of the key individuals of D.D.
Cable Partners;
2. A copy of the interview with David G. Rozzelle, which
interview was prepared by the law firm of Moss & Barnett.
This interview gives some insight into the plans for D.D.
Cable Partners.
3. A copy of interviews with Cable System Administrators.
4. The financial qualifications of the proposed franchisee.
5. A Notice of Public Hearing which should be approved by
the City Council at the next regularly scheduled City
Council meeting.
•
'CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAN ASSOCIATION l / �f��(
"CERTIFIED AS A BEAL PROPERTY LAB SPECIALIST BY TH£ MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION l '�`/^'✓�)`�
Mr. Gary Plotz
April 20, 1992
Page 2
As you know, we met and discussed at some length the status of
cable service in the community. Those discussions included
representatives of D.D. Cable Partners, Star, the Hutchinson
Community Video Network, Inc., and yourself.
The issues that were discussed included but were not limited to
the following:
1. Cable Reception, Don Hansen presented a report dealing
with the cable reception difficulties including the
problems involving the paging tower for the telephone
company. Commitments were made to make sure that the
cable reception problems were resolved and in particular,
cable reception problems involving Hutchinson Community
Video Network, Inc. I am reporting to you, as well, that
immediately following our meeting Star Cablevision
employees were in the process of attempting to correct
reception problems relating to HCVN, Inc.
Commitments were made to sweep the system at least once •
a year with a goal of eventually sweeping the system
twice a year. A significant capital budget has been set
aside for the system as a whole and Hutchinson will see
the benefit of the increased capital expenditures.
2. Additional Channels. There was discussion concerning
the possibility of additional channels. D.D. Cable
Partners indicated that they intended to survey the
community with respect to both the Midwest Sports Channel
(MSC) and other possible channels. I did introduce
represents of D.D. Cable Partners to Ansel Dahl of
Appleton Public Television and presumably something will
be worked out in that regard. There are probably
additional channels that we don't know about that could
also be added, assuming the market and expenses warranted
it.
3. Public Access Issues. D.D. Cable Partners did make a
commitment to continue the 35 cent HCVN fee until the
end of the franchise agreement. There was extensive
discussion concerning the non performance of the system
as it relates to public access and as noted above, D.D.
Cable Partners is investigating that issue.
4. Noncompliance Issues. In several respects, Star is not •
in compliance with the franchise agreement. Those areas
9
Mr. Gary Plotz
April 20, 1992
Page 3
of noncompliance are set out in Section 11 of the report
to the City of Hutchinson. D.D. Cable Partners agreed
to resolve those areas of noncompliance.
r�
There are a number of areas of concern that need to be addressed
relative to a new franchise agreement, but D.D. Cable Partners,
L.P. felt it was not appropriate to bargain on those issues in the
process of transferring the franchise. Since the franchise has
something less than two years to run, and since negotiations for
an extension of the franchise will begin within 90 to 120 days of
the completion of the acquisition, I do not believe it is necessary
to demand that these issues be resolved at the present time.
The biggest, and clearly most significant, concern has to do with
technical issues and I believe D.D. Cable Partners, L.P. left with
a very good understanding of the depth and extent of those present
problems.
I would recommend that we schedule the public hearing as soon as
possible and move this matter along.
At the present time, I am anticipating that I will recommend
approval of the transfer of the franchise. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
G.IwBarry Anderson
GBA:lm
Enclosures
CC HCVN Board of Directors (without enclosures)
Sue Potter
David Rozzelle
Moss & Barnett, Attention: Adrian Herbst
Leo J. Hindery, ]r. Da vid G. Rozzelle
Leo I. Hindery, Jr.. is the founder.
Managing General Partner and Chief
Executive Officer of InterMedia.
NIr Hindey 44. formed InterMedia in
1988. tcithm 18 months. the Company
had acquired ,able television systems
serving some 320.;.W subscribers in
Arizona. California. Hawaii. Georgia.
\crth Carolina. South Carolina and
Tennessee
By earl 1989. InterMedia Partners
had become one of the 30 largest operators
tit multiple cable television systems in the
Cmted States. leading Cablevision
Magazine to describe the young company
as - the success story of cable
entrepreneurs in 1989. -
The initial transactions were fonowed
by additional acquisitions in California.
South Carolina. Hawaii. Illinois. Iowa.
Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Before launching InterMedia. Mr.
Hindery was Chief Officer for Planning
and Finance of The Chronicle Publishing
Compam of San Francisco. which serves
more than 290.000 cable television
customers. operates three television
stations and owns 17 newspapers.
As the second most senior officer of
this privareh held media company. Mr.
Hindery was responsible for all
acquisitions. finance and development
ac uvities,
Prior to joining The Chronicle
Publishing Compan Mr. Hindery was
Chief Financial Officer and Managing
Director of Becker Paribas Incorporated
and a senior member of all the
cam mnment and credit comminees of this
major ceu fork -based investment
hanking firm. d
His career includes more Than l0 years
of e"periena at two Fortune 500
.ompames as the senior financial officer.
Mr. Hinder % graduated with honors
'ro m the Graduate School of Business of
Stanford University. where he earned the
degree of Master of Business
Administration in 1971. He graduated
with honors from Searde University. where
he now is a member of the Board of
Trustees and recently was honored as
Alumnus of the Year.
■
David G. Rozzelle is the General
Partner of InterMedia who is the Chief
Executive Officer of Cable Operations.
Mr. ROZZelle. 45. heads the team of
seasoned cable television executives who
helped build lnierMedia in less than two
years from a start-up enterprise into the
nation's 34th largest cable company. He
leads the budgeting process. directs
franchise relations. supervises system
operations. administers personnel policies
and evaluates potential acquisittons.
Prior to pining InterMedia.
Mr. Rozzelle was a Partner in the
communications law firm of Fletcher.
Heald S Hildreth in Washington. D.C..
which is the oldest such firm in the United
States..mr. Rozzelle. who joined the firm
in 1973 and became a full Partner in 1978,
spent much of his time administering the
60- person office.
Throughout his career..Mf. Rozzelle
represented many prominent companies
in the United States, particularly in the
cable industry. He was actively involved in
many of the key management decisions of
his clients, including acquisitions.
financings. day -to-day operating issues.
regulatory matters. personnel decisions.
technkal matters and programming
questions.
Mr. Rozzelle served for more than 10
Years as senior communications counsel
to %tstern Communications. Inc.. the
cable television division of The Chronicle
Publishing Company. In 1986, he also
served as Chief Operating Officer of one of
Western's subsidiaries.
A graduate of die University of
MarYland. Mt. Rozzelle obtained his law
egret from the National Law Center of
George Washington University.
■
Edward G. L Iebst, Jr.
Edward G_ Liebst. If a General
Partner of InterMedia and its Chief
financial Officer.
.Mr Liebst. 41. oversees the financial
performance of all InterMedia assets . as
well as the anal} sis and financing of
Potential acquisitions,
He brings to his position I I ,years of
developing and financing cable television
transactions as an investment banker and
a lender to media companies.
PnOr ro pining InterMedia as a
founding Partner in 1968. Mr. Liebst was
a Vice President in the investment banking
unit of the Bank of Amenca and
BankAmerica Capital Corporation. In his
four years with the bank. as wen as in
Previous positions, he became familiar
with many of the nation's leading muluple
able system operators. their finance
SUMS and the able properties themsei es.
Hr. Liebst began his career in media
finance in 1976 with Baker Paribas
Incorporated, where he was associated
with Baker Communications Assocurcs.
a cable investmenr partnership orgy nuto
by the firm. As an officer of Baker a
Partner in this loan and investment fund.
his responsiblities included industry and
transaction analysis, portfolio
administration and investment execution.
Mr. Liebst obtained a Bachelor of .Arts
degree with honors from Sr Norben
College and eamed a .Master of Business
Administration degree from DePaul
Universin• in Chicago.
■
-9-
IF
-10-
�_P•
On March 20, 1992, we met with David G. Rozzelle, a
general partner of InterMedia Capital Manaqement II, L.P., to
discuss D D Cable's plans and intentions with respect to the
cable television systems subject to the Stock Purchase
Agreement. The following summarizes these discussions, in a
question and answer format:
Adrian E. Herbst:
What changes do you plan to make locally as a result of
this acquisition?
David G. Rozzelle:
One of the first things we are doing is to create a
regional office, or a regional headquarters, in the
Prior Lake /Savage area. This office will also be a
local office from the standpoint that local services can
be accommodated at the office. It is important for you
to know that the regional office will include, here in
Minnesota on a regional basis, a division of the
corporate headquarters. John Brinker, formerly with
United Artists, will fill the newly- created position of
Regional Engineer. Four new senior technicians will be
'
hired.
AEH: What about existing Star personnel and individuals that
are now operating locally to provide service in
communities? Are you planning to eliminate jobs or
change personnel?
DGR: There will be changes; however, we are sensitive to the
needs of communities to have stability in the local
i
operations. Many Star individuals will remain and will
be employed by our company.
J
t
AEH: Will the sale of the Star Cable systems to your company
cause rates to increase?
DGR: I can tell you that our purchase of the cable systems
will not cause pressure on rates. The acquisition has
been carefully designed to keep pressure off rate
increases. Of course, rates may increase over the next
several years. However, those rate increases would be
related to our costs of doing business and providing the
services and not because of a leveraged buyout.
-10-
�_P•
AEH: Do you intend to increase tiering of programming?
AEH: Do you follow any particular set or code of consumer
protection standards? For example, have you
incorporated into your day -to -day operations in various
communities enforcement of the NCTA Customer Service
Standards, or have you developed your own separate
written customer service standards?
DGR: We do not have a written set of
our cable services. However,
incorporate into our activities
we have been a leader in
communities, where we have rece
for having done so.
standards applicable to
we are endeavoring to
the NCTA standards, and
the country in many
ived NCTA certification
AEH: Do you have separate customer service agreements or
contracts?
•
-11-
DGR: In many cases, it's a question of creating programming
tiers h+here none now exist. we do intend to create
tiering, because we believe services should be provided
for every budget. However, this will involve
rechannelling, so it won't happen right away.
r
AEH: Will the transfer create so much debt to the cable
system that the cable operator will not have flexibility
in the future to meet new technology?
DGR: Our company is committed to improving the quality of its
€
cable systems. For example, in a Tennessee system, you
would see that we have been involved in an upgrade of
=
the cable system. It is to our advantage to have the
latest state -of- the -art cable system and we are
committed to do so. Further, the reserves that we have
i
made in our finances will enable us to have the
j
flexibility necessary to incorporate new technology
gy when
it is appropriate to do so. This purchase will not
affect our ability to improve or to upgrade the cable
systems as they are needed in the various communities.
However, major improvements will be tied to renewals, in
many cases.
AEH: Will the manner in which you bill customers differ from •
that of Star Cable? In other words, do you break out
charges differently than what Star has done in the past?
DGR: We will be using a similar billing format to that of
Star Cable. The billing format we use is out of a
central billing service. Customers will not notice any
change in billings as a result of our acquisition of the
cable system.
AEH: Do you follow any particular set or code of consumer
protection standards? For example, have you
incorporated into your day -to -day operations in various
communities enforcement of the NCTA Customer Service
Standards, or have you developed your own separate
written customer service standards?
DGR: We do not have a written set of
our cable services. However,
incorporate into our activities
we have been a leader in
communities, where we have rece
for having done so.
standards applicable to
we are endeavoring to
the NCTA standards, and
the country in many
ived NCTA certification
AEH: Do you have separate customer service agreements or
contracts?
•
-11-
DGR: No. We do have work orders, but we do not require our
customers to enter into a service contract, and we do
not have any form of written agreement with our
customers.
r
AEH: Do your use Customer Satisfaction Surveys, either in
individual communities or on a national basis?
DGR: We regularly use Customer Satisfaction Surveys on a
local level. Generally, these are done annually. If a
Customer Satisfaction Survey dictates the need or
interest in a particular new program or service, we will
attempt to deal with that on a local basis. we have a
"subscriber creed" which states, in effect, that the
subscriber is the boss. We also employ a national
training director who visits various systems to give
customer service refresher courses annually, on such
things as courtesy and efficiency.
AEH: It's been said that your company has a niche or is in
the business of taking over distressed cable companies
and then holding them for a short time and selling
them. Does this apply to you?
DGR: I can tell you that it does not. Certainly we attempt
to make good purchase arrangements and, unlike the late
1980's when crazy prices were paid for cable systems, we
are in the business of trying to acquire systems on a
reasonable basis. However, you can be assured that it
is not our company philosophy to turn over cable
systems. We are in for the long term. Further, we have
assembled a team of knowledgeable and experienced cable
people, not merely investors. We are endeavoring to
operate cable systems on a long -term basis and to do a
good job at it. However, our investors eventually must
recover their investments.
AEH: What is your attitude about system maintenance?
DGR: We do have a very strong commitment to maintenance, and
take it very seriously. For example, we have worked on
the Federal Communication Commission's technical
standards and we have interjected ideas that I think
some of our peers in the cable industry might not be
totally appreciative of; on the other hand, it is the
type of thing that we think will be important to ensure
good quality cable systems.
One of our chief technicians, David Large, holds many
patents. He is well recognized for his technical
ability. He sets the tone for our company and we have a
very strong corporate philosophy towards maintaining the
cable systems to work well and to provide good service.
-12-
AEH: what is your attitude towards public access? .
DGR: we believe public access is an important part of a cable
televisi system and, in fact, believe some of the
programs that are now being developed are becoming more
valuable as cable system services. However, we do not
try to promote or to develop it and we do not serve as a
catalyst for making access happen. It's our belief that
if access is going to work, it is up to an individual
municipality and community interest.
If a community has a strong preference to have any sort
of access program, including public, educational or
governmental access services, we will help to develop
that and work together with the community to make sure
that it is very successful.
Because a number of communities in which we have cable
systems have developed access programs, and often times
access programs are of a nature that could be shared
with other areas, we believe it could be very beneficial
to have a data bank of information about access programs
that are available throughout all of our systems, and
make those access programs available between communities
on some sort of an exchange basis.
•
•
-13-
u Neither D D Cable nor its general partner, InterMedia
Partners II, owns, operates or controls any cable
communications system at this time. Franchises are currently
sought in one hundred forty -five (145) communities in Illinois,
Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa, ranging in size from 60 to 9,062
homes.
InterMedia Partners, formed in 1988, has as its general
partners Leo J. Hindery, Jr., David G. Rozzelle, and Edward G.
Liebst, Jr. These are the same individuals who are general
partners of InterMedia Capital Management II, which is the
general partner of InterMedia Partners II, D D Cable's general
' partner.
We contacted eight (8) communities with cable systems
currently operated by InterMedia Partners to ascertain:
(1) how the cable operator has worked with the
municipalities;
(2) if subscribers appear to be satisfied with the
service rendered; and
(3) the extent of support by InterMedia Partners for
public access programming and local programming.
-14 r_� I
At least one municipal official from each community was
contacted and asked the following questions, giving responses
as summarized below:
i
1. How many years has InterMedia Partners been operating the
cable system?
InterMedia has operated the systems for periods
ranging from approximately nine months to three years.
2. Did InterMedia Partners build the cable system?
In no case has InterMedia Partners built the cable
system.
3. How old is the existing system?
System age ranges from nine years to twenty -seven
years.
4. What type of cutbacks or amendments have been made since
InterMedia Partners took over?
•
-14 r_� I
Some communities noted no cutbacks and /or
amendments. One noted price increases and channel
changes. One community noted improvements in
customer service and repair work. Another community
added' penalties of $1,000 per day for "down time"
under the franchise terms. while the cable operator
protested this, it was accepted and no penalties have
been assessed, to date.
5. Is there a local office for the cable operator? If not,
how far away is the office?
In the Gainesville CableVision system, serving
suburban Atlanta, the local office is located in
Gainesville, between 6 and 13 miles from the suburban
communities we contacted. In all other cases,
InterMedia maintains a local office in the community.
6. How many basic cable channels are there?
Basic cable channels ranged from approximately 10 to
30.
7. Does the cable operator support public access
programming? Is there public access programming?
Most communities report the existence of and support •
for public access programming. Two indicated there
is no channel capacity on their systems dedicated to
public access programming.
B. Does InterMedia do any local programming?
The majority of the communities stated that
InterMedia does no local programming.
9. Do the schools use the system?
The majority of the communities indicated no use of
the system by schools.
10. Are most subscribers happy? Has the City received many
complaints?
Responses to this question ranged from positive
statements of subscriber satisfaction, to indications
of dissatisfaction with programming changes and rate
increases.
11. Does the cable operator satisfactorily resolve subscriber
complaints?
•
-15-
Most communities believe subscriber complaints are
satisfactorily resolved. However, one graded the
company "C+ and getting better."
i
12. what are the current subscriber rates?
Current subscriber rates range from approximately
$8.29 for 10 basic channels, to $32.60 for Basic plus
HBO.
13. Has InterMedia Partners made any changes in subscriber
rates?
All communities report rate increases since
InterMedia Partners acquired the system.
19. How would you describe the City's relationship with the
cable operator?
Most report relationships ranging from excellent to
pretty good. One stated the company "is aware of its
rights," and another that the relationship is
"frustrating."
15. What types of problems has the City experienced with
InterMedia Partners?
Rate increases, programming changes, and difficulty
in expanding the system into new subdivisions were
described as problems with the cable operator.
However, four communities reported problems as none
or minimal.
16. what were the franchise fees? Are they paid on time?
Franchise fees ranged from 3% to 5% of gross
revenues. Fees are paid timely.
17. what is the programming /picture quality?
Most communities responded that programming /picture
quality was at least good. However, two reported
picture quality problems.
18. Would you grant a new franchise to InterMedia Partners?
Why or why not?
Six of eight communities responded "yes." One
believes significant changes are necessary, and one
reported a need to negotiate regarding rates.
The specific responses for each community follow.
-16-
Flowery Branch, Georgia •
Spoke with Fvelp Swan- City Clerk (404) 967 -6715
Answers to survey questions:
1. November 1, 1989 letter states that Melanie will become
new owner. May 30, 1991 letter refers to Intermedia.
2. Already existed.
3. Approximately 10 years.
4. Price changes in April, 1991 and December, 1991 deleted
channels and added some - average increases.
5. N/A in Flowery Branch;
In Gainesville - 13 miles from City Hall.
6. 11 chs.
7.
Yes, yes enjoy very much.
8.
Doesn't know.
9.
Doesn't know.
10.
Yes, no.
11.
Speaking for herself, yes.
General Manager and ladies in
office easy to work with.
12.
$16.95 basic cable as of
December, 1991. Additional
outlets reduced 33% - flat fee
$5.00 per month for up to 3
additional outlets.
13.
Yes, 1991 effective in '92.
14.
Hasn't heard any complaints -
congenial relationship.
15. None.
16. 3%
Paid on time in February.
17. Very good picture quality.
Yes.
18. Yes, unless if charging outlandish fees at time, doesn't
know what legal ties City has with cable company.
•
-17-
COM - very good
Sunny Senecker, General Manager o utt cable comp in development
public relations - helped with p
areas.
to comment on D. D. Cable - not aware system sold to
Unable
them.
Oakwood, Georgia
s�sJs� w •
Mr�au ley, city manUar" (404) 534 -2365
Transferred to Melanie - Intermedia Partners II on July 8, 1991
- passed by City
Answers to survey questions:
1. Since summer of 1991.
2 A previous operator.
3, 1983.
4. No cutbacks.
No amendments.
5. Yes, in Gainesville - 6 miles away.
6. 28
7. Yes, not sure.
8. Some.
9. Doesn't know.
10. ups and downs
Basically yes
No, very few
11. Yes.
12. Do not have.
13. Yes, during changes or shortly thereafter.
14. Good.
15. Minimal - dug up temporarily.
-18-
16. $1,691.35, yes.
y
17. Good
18. Yes.
Santa Clara, California
Carol McCarthy, Deputy City Manager
(408) 984 -3105
Spoke with Carol McCarthy
(she gave my name to Ron Garratt,
Asistant City Manager)
COMMENTS FROM CAROL MCCARTHY:
On personal level:
Negotiated with in -house attorneys on cable T.V.
No agreement to complete public access.
No station for public access.
Annual report brought in for residents.
First cable system in area.
30 channel capacity.
Old cable wires.
In some areas you can go one block over in City and subscribers
are with a different cable operator or some with upgraded /new
system.
Nothing in contract to upgrade system.
Does not have proper language to hammer out certain changes.
Carol McCarthy is lobbying to upgrade system.
One system given to City - open.
No services with it.
1996 Franchise up.
Responsive to requests.
-19-
i
Use highend channels - grainy.
i Public Community Programs
Take 29 away - poor quality - put on 34.
City channel for fire station channel - sensor
Geared for small system.
Answers to survey questions:
1. 3 years
2. Existing system for Hearst (newspaper conglomerate).
3• 25 years.
4. Expanded. Receive a lot of abuse from Council to upgrade
system. Made improvements with customer service.
Repairs. Taken a lot more responsibility in the last
10 -18 months.
5. Yes, across street Keep in touch regularly to go over
reports.
6• 29. Basic service.
35. Premium service above 29.
•?• Yes, but unable to work with City because of limited
channel space. Access so limited. Time limited.
8. No.
9. would like to.
10. Improvement, old infrastructure. Average six a month.
11. C +. Getting better. Slow going.
12. Basic + HBO $32.60
34.95 with 2 premium channels ( ?)
44.55 with 2 premium channels
39.95 with 3 premium channels
Surrounding cities higher.
t
13. Three changes to rates. Changes are every 10 months since
took over.
1
14 • To City. General Manage. I
away. A lot of contact. Companyawae rightstl�an mile
15. Covered.
i
-20-
8
i
i
1�
1
!� 1
1:
i
I
i 1
1
�1
}
a
9
16. 31 Yea.' �I
17. Not good. i
18. If significdnt changes aren't made, will i
owner. Will open 3 90' with another
will cost millions to bring system up to to pa some changes.
years to make agreements with company, par' Take 1 1/2
COMMNTS FROM RON GARRATT:
South Bay fourth Franchise in 25 years.
Unique system.
Six communities in area. Santa Clara is at bottom of structure.
Cannot provide certain services which are provided to other
communities.
29 channels.
R=
Doesn't have community public access channel. Lack of access.
Need all 29 for programming.
Loosely conformed Franchise.
Now City talking with South Bay to put money into building up.
City wants revisions to Ordinance regarding customer service.
I
Evaluated cable company.
Went through rigorous progress with new company.
Sierra Vista, Arizona
City Clerk
Purchasing Department
(602) 958 -3315
with She handles complaints.
(Jenny answered survey questions 10 and 11):
10. No, changed programming 1/92. A lot of complaints
regarding channels taken off. Increased rates.
Recently received over 100 since change in January.
Before January 1, one complaint a week regarding service
and cost.
-21-
Complaints relate to:
a. had a lot of CA channels taken off.
People
complained a lot. CA transplants.
b. Mexican station. Receive complaints to take
off.
C. TBN taken off.
Far away from major city. Population 32,900.
Doesn't
know subscriber count.
11. Negotiating new Franchise with them.
25 year Franchise.
Called Purchasing Department - Mike Claussen, Purchasing
Agent.
Left message. He can answer questions regarding
technical
details. He referred me to City Manager, Jim
witlock.
Left message.
Spoke with Jim witlock, City Manager.
(Four months with City.)
Answers to survey questions:
1. Second or third owner of system.
At end of 25 year Franchise.
2. No.
3.
9.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
25
None aware of. [lave non - restrictive Franchise. Not in
detail.
Yes, 1 1/2 miles.
30
Not currently, governmental programming
public. Public is not resisting.
No.
Not at this time.
Negotiating in new Franchise $300,000
schools.
as opposed to
for studio for
-22-
10
11.
12.
13.
19.
Yes, 100 last 2 to 3 months regarding rates /programming
changes.
anges.
Retired people /military.
35,000 populaeion.
Conservative community.
Rate increases regularly.
1970's technology.
Depends, rate increase occurred within 60 days and channel
ch
Open ended. Pass onto company
(Will check into and call back.)
See above.
Frustrating.
Does not follow -up.
15. No. Say in rates.
Desert did extensive surveys with 8,000 customers.
10 -12% response rate.
Used survey responses to justify changes to system.
16. 2 %, yes.
Agreed to 5% in new Franchise.
June 30, Franchise expires.
17. 2 pay - per -view.
2 premium channels bring broadcast channels
miles.
Channel A:
1 - not used
2 - promote pay service
3 - Mexican channel
9 - home shopping
Based on survey. Reflects wishes of customers.
Los Angeles consultant says picture quality OK.
in from 70
18. Yes, in June.
Evaluation done. Yes (will call back with results.)
Marion, North Carolina
McDowell County Cablevision
Earl Daniels, City Manager
Referred to Charles Abernathy
(704) 652 -7127
-23-
Answers to survey questions:
1. Assigned several times last two years.
2. No, extended system.
3. October 5, 1965.
4. Not aware of any.
5. Yes, 1/2 mile.
6. Channels 3 -13 $ 8.29
Channels 3 -32
Full basic channels 20.62
Remote 3.15
HBO 13.08
Show 12.55
Cinemax 11.50
Disney 11.50
Encore 9,9
2 pay channels 18.85
3 pay channels 24.10
7. Have capability, do some local commercials, weather
channels. Not aware.
8. No.
9. Not aware of. (County Manager may be able to answer.)
10. Occasional complaint calls from people who cannot obtain
service from outlying area. Company unable to help
because of budget.
11. Yes.
1 2. January 1, 1992. See N6.
13. See N6.
1 4. Pretty good.
15. See N10 (County area) and rates.
16. Was collecting fees for County and City. Now just City,
which McDowell took over. 5 %, goes up based on amount of
gross revenues. Maximum 5 %.
17. Some channels can't pick up real well because of
electronic interference. Conflict with repeater bleed -in
and ghosts.
v
I�
1
1
I�1
I;
1
-24- i
18. Would have to negotiate regarding rates.
i
Peachtree City, Georgia
Cindy Price, Secretary to Mayor
(404) 487 -7657
iP91S w •
(She answered survey 9uestions R10 and till call the
10, Averages 10 calls ve mo nth.
one through a different ochannels.
City because they'
11. Yes. Makes sure they do. Stays on their back until they
take care of.
(She handles
Svoke__w! to Fra M ttPr Citv Clerk•
Franchise).
ComWNTS FROM FRANCES
Things running smoothly.
Answers to survey questions:
1. Approximately 2 years. 4 different owners over the years.
2. No.
3. Since 1978 - 1979.
4. Not aware. No control over since change with Cable Act.
City put penalties in Franchise t
time
- $1,000 per
Penalties in Franchise regarding d
day.
Company p rotested, but accepted. Has not assessed
City has not used. Threatened company.
penalty.
5. Yes, 2 to 5.
6. Doesn't know.
7. No channel dedicated to access programming.
City was recently allowed to use pay - per -view channel to
air programs.
Company reserves right to use. p r o ramming.
6 months company has not interrupted ; however, they
City ),as not insisted on channel; for renewal.
will negotiate when Franchise is up
-25-
C
1�
1
y
1
S. No.
9. No.
10. See above. 10
11 See above.
12. $50.00. 2 movie channels and basic.
13. Yes, at least 2 -3 times.
14. Good, City feels shouldn't oversee as much as they are.
15. Cable not buried. Rates. New City. Problem getting
cable in new subdivision.
16. 4 %, yes.
17. Fine, better than having regular T.V.
18. Yes.
COMMENTS FROM FRANCES
Renegotiating Franchise is 1992, up in 1994.
Receptive to new cable company coming in to have 2 companies in
City to create competition and keep rates down.
McKenzie, Tennessee
Mayor: Robert Putnam
City Clerk: Jane Thompson
(901) 352 -2292
Spoke with Robert Putnam Mavo
Answers to survey questions:
1 • 2 years.
2. No.
3 • Early 70's.
4 • No, expanded.
5. Yes, 1 mile.
6. 20 approximately.
-26-
7. Yes, yes.
8. No.
9, Yes, public service announcements.
School boards voted to promote classroom interaction.
10. Yes, 80% or more.
No, not at all.
At first, received a lot.
Routed to cable company.
11. Yes.
12. $17.95, approximately, for basic.
13. Yes. Minimal raise. Once in 3 years. 12 -13% raise.
14. Excellent.
15. None, lived up to promise with rate.
16. 5 %, yes, 1/4' 1 y.
17. Very good.
18. Yes.
Greenwood, South Carolina
City Manager: Steven Brown
(803) 942 -8400
Sooke wi Steven Brown
1. 3 changes in last 4 -5 years.
2 years.
2. No.
3. Approximately 20 years.
4 . No.
5• Yes, 2 - 3 miles.
6. Last year changed.
7 • Some, did have channel, but no longer. Need badly.
$• Some, but virtually none.
_27-
MW
L
9. No, used to, no longer. i
10. Elders dissatisfied, feel being charged too much.
Fixed income, dissatisfied.
Minimum increaese of 50% over 3 -4 years. Get complaints.
Receive complaints regarding not being able to expand into
new developments. ,
11. Most of the time.
12. $13.00."
13. Did not make changes when first took over. Minimum of 5% 1
every year.
14. Good.
Deals with person that has been there for 20 years.
Been with system since inception.
15. None.
16. 3 %, yes.
17. Excellent.
18. Yes.
System has improved over last 10 years.
COMtIENTS :
Had competition in City. New cable company charges $8.95 for
basic. TCI had to reduce basic charge from $14.95 to $8.95.
When TCI was sold, competitor sold out to same company. Basic
rate went back to $14.95.
-28-
FlNANCIAL QUALIFICATIONS
A. Overview
I
i
As described earlier in this Report, D D Cable is
the transferee of Star Cablevision is difficult
a
complex entity consisting of a general partner, InterMedia
Partners II, and a limited partner, Midwest Franchises Corp.
F
("Midwest Franchises "), each of which in turn is either owed
I�
by, or comprised of, numerous other entities.
own pro form income statement, D D
provided financial statements for InterMedia
Midwest Franchises is ultimately owned by General Electric
Company ( "GE "). Between Midwest Franchises and GE exist two
intermediate entities:
According to D D Cable, these are relevant because
Midwest Franchise's "parent ", General
Electric Capital Corporation ( "GE Capital "), which is
a
wholly -owned subsidiary of GE Financial Services, Inc. ( "GE
Partners II has been designed to perform in a
Financial Services "); and GE Financial Services, which owns all
of GE Financial Services and in turn is a wholly -owned
subsidiary of GE.
The composition of InterMedia Partners II is equally
complex. InterMedia Partners II has both a general partner,
InterMedia Capital Management II, and several limited
partners. The limited partners of InterMedia Partners II are
identified
1
only as ^various institutional investors."
According to a letter of David
G. Rozzelle dated March 3, 1992,
most of these institutional investors are "national banks
1'
or
Fortune 500 companies." The general partner of InterMedia
Partners II,
InterMedia Capital Management II, is itself a
limited
t
partnership. The general partners are identified as
Leo Hindery, Jr., Edward Liebst, Jr,
and Mr. Rozzelle. The
limited partner(s) are not identified.
y[
The other documents and financial records provided by D D
Cable and which form the basis of the financial analysis herein
are: GE Capital's 1990 Form 10 -K; the December 31, 1991
balance sheet of D D Cable's general partner, InterMedia
Partners II; the Stock Purchase Agreement; and D D Cable's
Agreement of Limited Partnership. With the exception of GE's
Form 10 -K, none of the submitted financial statements had been
audited.
-31-
Evaluating the financial wherewithal of D D Cable to
perform as
because it
the transferee of Star Cablevision is difficult
sheet. In
has provided only a I?r_Q f9rZa consolidated balance
lieu of its
i#
Cable has
own pro form income statement, D D
provided financial statements for InterMedia
Partners I.
"InterMedia
According to D D Cable, these are relevant because
similar
Partners II has been designed to perform in a
manner."
�.
The other documents and financial records provided by D D
Cable and which form the basis of the financial analysis herein
are: GE Capital's 1990 Form 10 -K; the December 31, 1991
balance sheet of D D Cable's general partner, InterMedia
Partners II; the Stock Purchase Agreement; and D D Cable's
Agreement of Limited Partnership. With the exception of GE's
Form 10 -K, none of the submitted financial statements had been
audited.
-31-
B. D D Cable's Pro Forma Concolid ted Balance S h e e t
D D Cable's pro forma balance sheet dated April 30,
is straightforward. Liabilities have 1992
two components: (1) two
loans, $30 million and $96.5 million, from GE Capital and
others; and (2) $672,000 of current liabilities. According to
D D Cable, the $30 million loan is, in fact, part of a $93.5
million revolving line of credit. The "partners' capital" 6
account of $81 million reflects equity investments of $71
million and $10 million from GE Capital and InterMedia
Partners I1, respectively. Finall
"investment in cable television systems is simply a asset,
figure, derived by adding liabilities and capitalp Y a "plugged"
While the median debt -to- equity ratio for the overall
cable industry is not known, D D Cable's ratio of 1.57.1
appears to be relatively conservative. By comparison, the
debt -to- equity ratio of Tele - Communications, Inc., the largest
cable system operator, was almost 17:1 as of December 31, 1990.
As a practical matter, the debt -to- equity ratio is
significant because it affects an entity's interest burden:
the larger the ratio, the more resources must be devoted to
p aying
umulative t negative cash flow fac
forD Ca
first several that its 1
its existence will be substantially less than Years of mlion
the additional credit available on its revvolvingllloan'
Assuming this projection is accurate, D D Cable will have
sufficient funds available from operations and /or additional
borrowing to repay its debt.
1 1L' • - v I�IFl1im Z1 11 1 =11 11
The only financial document provided in connection with
InterMedia Partners 11 is a balance sheet dated December 31,
1990. Tire key items on the balance sheet, accounts payable and
syndication costs, reflect the organizational costs associated
with launching D D Cable.
D D Cable has provided significantly more information on
the financial condition and performance of InterMedia
Partners II. According to D D Cable, InterMedia Partners I
serves as the model for InterMedia Partners II. For 1990,
InterMedia Partners I sustained a loss of $126.5 million on
revenues of $99,3 million. However, principally because
d epreciation and amortization totalled $112.7 million, negative
cash flow was only $2.8 million,. D D Cable characterizes the
foregoing loss and negative cash flow as "planned, important,
and expected" during the partnership's early years. Later, it
expects cash flow to become Positive due to revenue growth.
-32-
To the extent that the performance of InterMedia
Partners II follows that of InterMedia Partners II, it will
require additional funds to offset initial negative cash flow
from operations'. D D Cable has represented that working
capital and /or additional borrowing will be sufficient to meet
these needs.
D. GE Capital Fob f-g
GE Capital's equity ($71 million) and credit
($126.5 million) investments in D D Cable collectively
represent a tiny piece of GE Capital's total assets. At
December 31, 1990, GE Capital's total assets exceeded $70
billion; of this total, only .28 %, or substantially less than
1 %, related to D D Cable. Even if GE Capital were to write off
100% of its loans and equity investment in D D Cable, its total
equity of approximately $6.9 billion would scarcely be affected.
However, as a limited partner, GE Capital is not liable
for D D Cable's debts. By the same token, neither is it
obligated to contribute additional capital, except to avoid the
harsh tax consequences associated with violating the Treasury
Regulations which interpret Internal Revenue Code Section
704(b). Nevertheless, D D Cable believes that GE Capital's
investment in the entity is such that, if necessary, it will
make additional funds available to protect its initial
investment.
E. S.Q nClusion
Based on our review of the documents made available to its
as well as certain representations and projections made by D D
Cable, it appears that D D Cable will be financially able to
perform its duties as Star Cablevision's transferee.
The key representation concerns the credit line available
to D D Cable. According to D D Cable, the revolving line of
credit available to it, $43.5 million, will be more than
adequate to fund any negative cash flow sustained in the first
few years of operation. This presumes that D D Cable's
projections regarding revenue growth and operating performance,
which we have not analyzed, are in fact realistic. The
foregoing calculations indicate that D D Cable expects to have
sufficient resources to service its debt.
To the extent that D D Cable's projections prove to he
optimistic, it believes that GE Capital's resources give it
additional financial strength. However, as a limited partner,
GE Capital has no legal obligation to contribute additional
capital. GE Capital may, in fact, be predisposed to invest
additional sums to protect its initial investment, but this is
not guaranteed.
-33-
of Minneaota, willIhold I the City Council of the
act on the public hearin City
from the Proposed transfer of control of StartMidwest,s and
Cable present stockholder, Star Cablevision Inc'
Partners, L.P, a California Group, to D D
consisting of InterMedia Partners imite partnership
and Midwest Franchise Cor II, L.P. LP as general
P•, as limited partner. Partner,
The City Council will consider the legal, technical,
financial, and character qualifications of the above - referenced
entities to determine whether the proposed transfer of control
Will cause an adverse impact on the services provided to
cable
television subscribers.
The Public hearing is scheduled to begin at
at the City Hall located at
Minnesota. All interested m
Questions regarding Parties may attend and
city clerk's office this public hearing may be directed heard.
(phone p), to the
By;
City Clerk for the City of
Minnesota
PLEASE NOTE; This Notice should be published fourteen
days before the hearing in circulation
City area
in the n a newspaper of general (19)
.
-38-
FOBIF
On
NOTICE
OF PUBLIC MARM .
19
of Minneaota, willIhold I the City Council of the
act on the public hearin City
from the Proposed transfer of control of StartMidwest,s and
Cable present stockholder, Star Cablevision Inc'
Partners, L.P, a California Group, to D D
consisting of InterMedia Partners imite partnership
and Midwest Franchise Cor II, L.P. LP as general
P•, as limited partner. Partner,
The City Council will consider the legal, technical,
financial, and character qualifications of the above - referenced
entities to determine whether the proposed transfer of control
Will cause an adverse impact on the services provided to
cable
television subscribers.
The Public hearing is scheduled to begin at
at the City Hall located at
Minnesota. All interested m
Questions regarding Parties may attend and
city clerk's office this public hearing may be directed heard.
(phone p), to the
By;
City Clerk for the City of
Minnesota
PLEASE NOTE; This Notice should be published fourteen
days before the hearing in circulation
City area
in the n a newspaper of general (19)
.
-38-
FOBIF
C
M E M O R A N D U M
u
2- 350- 0705 -004
Gone Doherty
Apt #6D
1035 Texas Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
705 Dale St
174.51
cc: Larry Olson
705 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
3- 275- 0435 -236
J Schlumpberger
435 California St #2
Hutchinson MN 55350
435 California St #2
83.16
cc: Wayne Kenning
705 Milwaukee Av
Hutchinson MN 55350
• City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
D ATE:ARril 28, 1992
• Mayor City C• I
FROM: - 1• Departmen
Delinament water sewer • for / - month of A
Attached is a listing of the delinquent water and sewer accounts
for the month of Apr. Recommend service be discontinued on Monday,
May 4th, 1992 at Noon.
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
2- 035 - 0540 -023
Jay Henninger
540 Seconnd Av SW
Hutchinson MN 55350
540 Second Av SW
157.44
cc: Joseph Paffel
Rt 1
Hutchinson MN 55350
Promises Fri. 5/1/92
2- 350 - 0302 -072
Chris Doelger
302 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
302 Dale St
128.88
2- 470 - 0867 -092
Elvera Ahlbrecht
867 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
867 Harrington St
121.74
2- 585 -563 -081
Tim Kelly
563 Juul Rd
Hutchinson MN 55350
563 Juul Rd
93.18
cc: Bob Rasmussen
Rt 1 Box 55C
Darwin MN 55324
4W
L�
2- 670 - 0400 -019
2- 350 - 0325 -002
John Sandahl
Thomas Smith
400 Lynn Rd
325 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
400 Lynn Rd
325 Dale St
111.03
136.02
Promises 5/1/92
Promises 5/6/92
2- 700 - 1585 -001
Chris Johnson
2- 675 - 0544 -031
2- 350 - 0354 -044
Keith Krommenhoek
Geraldine Elliot
544 Madson Av
354 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
544 Madson Av
354 Dale St
146.73
157.44
1- 270 - 0715 -073
4W
L�
2- 675 - 0574 -063
2- 350 - 0505 -021
Harlan Emans
Richard Mattson
574 Madson Av
505 Dale St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
574 Madson Av
505 Dale St
121.74
189.57
Promises 4/30/92
2- 465- 0626 -081
2- 700 - 1585 -001
Chris Johnson
Michelle Healy
626 Harmony Ln
1585 McDonald Dr
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MM 55350
626 Harmony Ln
1585 McDonald Dr
143.16
126.00
Promises 4/30/92
1- 270 - 0715 -073
2- 470 - 0715 -031
Emans /Mueller
E Duesterhoeft
574 Madson Av
715 Harrington St
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hutchinson MN 55350
715 Brown St
715 Harrington St
15.73
171.72
Promises 4/30/92
4W
L�
April 22, 1992
M E M O R A N D U M
•
r
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Liquor License
There is a concern about whether or not the following two liquor
licenses have been in compliance with the city ordinance:
1. The Hangar Bar & Grill; Flyer's Night Club
2. J's Pizza Garten /Sports Bar
•
The matter is currently being reviewed by the Police Department and
City Attorney's office.
These items are on the regular City Council meeting agenda of
Tuesday, April 28, 1992, City Hall Council Chambers, 7:30 P.M.
cc: Steve Picha, J's Pizza Garten /Sports Bar
Mark Gaarder, The Hangar Bar & Grill
G. Barry Anderson, City Atty.
Steve Madson, Police Chief
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on xcyded paper -
Police Department
I0 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
C
M E M 0
•
DATE: April 23, 1992
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official
RE: Hangar & Flyer Liquor License [v
The attached list represents pending correction items to be completed prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy at the Hangar & Flyer Restaurant.
I would appreciate it, if this matter could be resolved prior to issuing the
liquor license or the license being issued contingent upon immediate
correction.
JGM /mms
cc: Mark Hensen
I
C \
J
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks &Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled pnper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
April 22, 1992
THE HANGAR
Air Gap Softener -
Condensate drain from cooler
Cover on floor drain in dining area
Remove deadbolt locks at panic hardware doors
Activate battery powered panic bars at restroom locations
Post occupant load sign by main door
Finish wall behind cashier top
THE FLYERS
Post occupant load sign by main door
Post "unlocked" sign by main door
Remove deadbolt locks at panic hardware doors
Exit signs must be lit at all times, not on switch!
Install emergency lights as required
Provide parking Gales. for future patio area
Patio door and patio by future permit
0
I
•
9 -0 .
DATE: April 21, 1992
TO: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
FROM: James G. Marka, Building official
RE: Flyers Nightclub /Hangar Restaurant Liquor License
M E M o
•
Prior to issuance of the Flyers Nightclub /Hangar Restaurant liquor license, I
suggest we add some continency language limiting parking o property only
under Mr. Dolder's ownership.
The Forbes business directly east, has e xperienced ongoing parking encroachmen
problems since the Flyers opened, and has r equested this matter be addressed
and resolved.
Along with the Building Department's documented plan review requirements, Mr.
Alex Gonzales, bar manager, has agreed to limit entry through the east door,
hopefully minimizing Mr. Forbes problem.
Also, Mr. Gonzales and Mr. Dolder are requesting a permit to install a
sliding glass door in the Flyers east wall for access to a volleyball court.
I have approved this permit and will document the parking encroachment
limitation.
Die '1bI�7
:i
cc: Marilyn J. Swanson
Mark Hensen
G. Barry Anderson
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
� - 64
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Prinled on recycled paper -
\k
MINNESOTA MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION
ROOM 4'00 733 SIB! 5Y ST.
ST. PAIR, MN 55101
PWNE 612496 -6168
CERTIFICATION OF AN ON SALE ANO?OR A SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE
HUTCHINSON
ANASAL INC. dba
TIIE HANGAR DAR AND GRILL
1150 IIHy 7 W
HUTCHINSON NN 55350
ONSL
$3,000.00
ISSUING AUTHORMY (Check only one)
^_ITYOF IIUTCHI NSON COUNTYOF M CLEOD
LK' Al NA'A OZ .IDW AflTNE115NIP, CDLORATIONI
A :,,,SAL INC.
l:f H�1PI
WSINESS ADDRESS
�IIUTCIIINSON
1 150 HS;Y 7 W
X5350
L41NSE TY" ICHEOt ONE OR aOiHI LICENSE PER GO
CWNTv
'?Da SALE CcZAV FROM 21_. TO 3131/93
1 Mc Laud
OAUUE fENSE NUM\ER oNsALEF'C SU'dID. LICENSE AVANNER
SUNDAT{EE aJSINESSI a
7 I S 3, 0001yr
If Pann e. FW. Scale1M tiryer,u 4aaan o1 Each , II•CQrpaalu Suu me Name Ma Aeavas Er EacH 016ur
M.TNEROf F'C-NN1N(
ADDRESS
Nary. Gaardar
RL 1, Box 124 Darwin i.a 55324 (612)275 -31:,
FARINEROFCC -':AME
AOOREaS
Julic Gaardar
Rt. 1, Box 124 Darwin MN 55324
PARTNERIOFFIC[RFAME
ADDRESS
The Ucerlsae must have am of the Idlowng:
CHECK ONE
❑ A. Liquor Uabaity Insurance (Dram Shop) — $50,CE0 per peon; $100,000 more then am Derson; $10,C00
property destruction; $50,000 and $100,000 fw lon Of means Of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF INSUR.
ANCE "TO THIS FORM
OA
❑ S. A Surety bond from a surety company With FridTnum coverages as apecifiod above in A.
OA
❑ C. A Cerfir.l. hem Ilx State Treasurer that the Licensee has deposited with the State, Trust Funds having
a
market vahue of $100,000 Dr S 100,000 In cash or rcOuntics.
1 CERTIFY THAT THIS LICENSE WAS APPROVED IN AN OFFICIAL MEETING BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE C;TY
ORCOUNTY.
Given Under My Hand and the Corporate
13th Fe
CIT YrL:UUNTY Seal thi day of 19 9
d rtl.
SEAL �.�J.rt
[y4 A, A1d,
During the past license yew has a sL rrFr Liquor ons been Issued under the Civil Liability
Law (DRAM SHOP)? E3 YES C NO N yes, atuch a copy of the 6utnnlons.
COh11.ETE THOSE ITEMS THAT APPLY
TPAHSACTIONTYFE rNEW 0REMORD[ANCEL
OATtSSUSP[NLON
h A[9FWAL D TRANSFER IT "PENSION
IFI TO
DAIS OF AEVDCATW 'CA04CFRAT10F1
ADDRSSSCNANCEFROM
TRANSF IN OF OWNERSHIP k" INANE AND ADORESSI
IMPORTANT NOTICE_
AL;R -T:. 1 -• ^n;,Erg L1UST IV. -- ACUITACIIT FEDEnAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL S,7A!P T4;S r,, 1 ;%rD O'!TPc
DU ?EAJ O= ALCOHOL RREA "'S AND 7;:3A000 FOR INFORMATION CALL 612 IN 14?6
0
9 -e .
11 1 111 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 in
"0. S'l,"• 4 111 M11IS1 co, minewavolls i
MUNICIPALITY OF ......
FIASUANT TO APPLICATION THEREFORO payment of a fee of ZZ.,.W ... the firing and approval of a bond in the sum of $Z,LXV.,.0tA
0 110" kwestigation and satisfactory evidence of the qualification of the licensee.,, herein named to receive the same and that the place of sale
syesflar described Is a proper and legal place therefor,
LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED
TO
.......... ............................ - ....... .........
... QA�. .... ......... I ................................................................ . ......... .............
46 4 en" .............. th*., '.—day of ..... r �a -rj, .... �, 191A, TO SELL INTOXICATING LIQUORS
by law AT RETAIL ONLY FOR CONSUMPTION "ON THE PREMISES" describ"'as ............. .... ..... ...............................................................
............ ..... . ................. ......................... .................. . .......................
j- .......... — ....... ............. ......................... .............................................................................................
.. . . ............... ......... I ....................... .. ... . ..................... .. ........ ....... .......... ................... ........... -- .. ............. ..........
WWCIPAUTY OF ala YN &17
. in said County and State, at which premises said licensee ... confrolS .. and operafe-S...
....... ...... I ........ ................................................................................. ...................
w; subjecf, however, to he laws of the United States, the laws of the State of Minnesota, the regulations and ordinances of sold munla
rules and regulations of the LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER, relating to the sale and distribution of intoxicating liquors, hereby
W hereof, and subject to revocation according to law for violation thereof.
106fte Is nontransferabl except by consent of the authority Issuing ...... * same.
S THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ...... jl%x� yi-`" Y1, ........ .. and the seal thereof this ..... ..
The ...... ... .... Co 4AI.C.i- V ......... .... ..... ......
of the ............ of... ;J71!.L. ..... . 0 .........
By ......... ..................... . .........................
..... A"Or ...... ..............................
.............. ............................ ....
No.
Ilitate of Minnesota,
COUNTY OF. ftk, Leod ......................
..J;....-- .,,.r
ISSUE DATE M0kDOIYV)
ord,
02/19/92_
PRODUCER
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER, THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW,
BLACKBUFN,NICKELS & SMITH INC.
___ r
P. D. BOX 367
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
MINNETONKA. MN 55343
COMPANY A ACCEPTANCE INDEr'NITY INS. COMP.
LETTER
COMPANY
LETTER B
INSURED
COMPANY
C
BANGER BAR & GRILL
LETTER
MARK GAARDER
COMPANY G
I :.050 WEST HGWY 7. PO BOX 203
LETTER
_
COMPANY E
IIUTCHINS'ON. MN 55350
7
LETTER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSU ED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, c
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY
BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDO =
TIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
'
• CO
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
17, Cr FIECTIVE
-_ c,o : _.,
- ,.
LIABILITY LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
.,,R
CC ^L RRE+YCE
AGGREGATE
LTR
_: �Me1 OGn`/1
,'r_�,rw. GC
GENERAL
LIABILITY
BODIL+
COMPREHENSIVE FORM
INdaR-
5
'
$
PREMISES OPERATIONS
UNDERGROUND
PROPE --Y
DAMAGE
5
$
EXPLOSION 6 COLLAPSE HA?ARO
I
PRODUCTS COMP, ETEC JPERATIONS
CONTRACTUk
BI A P_ S
$
COME .E.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOpS
BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE
PERSONAL INJURY
! PEPSONAL INJURY
$
AUTOMOBILE
LIABILITY
yx,.
ANY AUTO
�"'•
pEp
ALL OWED AUTOS IPP06' PASS I
BT p,
ALL OWNED AUTOS OTHER THAN)
'._ _` 15
PHI', PASS
HIRED AUTOS
NON-OWNED AUTOS
D AMAGE
DAMAGE
$
GARAGE LIABILITY
'i
BI 6 P]
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
BI d P.
CCMa •.EJIS
$
OTHER 'K. JMBRELLA FOP.:'.
I
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
:EACH ACCIDENT)
AND
,�,
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
S 1015EASE- POLICY LIMTI
$ (DISEASE EACH EMPLOYEE)
OTHER
POLICY LIMITS MEET
LigLLor Liability
LUMN334071
:/26/92
3/31/92 THE MINIMUM REQUIRE -
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS'LOCATIONSNEHICLES /SPECIAL ITEMS
ACT.
TAVERN
III Irsi
CITY OF HUTCH I NSON
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TIM
PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL YVk1O(f&
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
E
MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
hlUl'CHIN_0 MN 55350
LEFT' X} i9t 0( 4FE)E�d�AAd7i7R[PGA7Q1[]COS�701
ALITHOR17FD RFPRFSFNTATIVE 1 /J
..J;....-- .,,.r
0 0
The Hangars Restaurant
1150 W. Hwy. 7
Hutchinson, MN 55350
587 -4887
Cessna
$1.79
6reah gnound bee6
burger
794
Stealth
994
$2.19
6nesh gnound bee6
bungen with
Ameni.can cheese
Spi t6ine
994
• $2.39
6resh gnound bees
burger with
lettuce, tomato,
pickles and mayo
494
Pitcher Soda
B -17 Bomber
Pitcher Beer
$2.69
6nesh gnound bee6
burger with
lettuce, tomato,
pickles, mayo and
American cheese
Double Cessna
$3.39
Double Stealth
$4.19
Double Spit6in.e
$4.49
Double B -17 Bomber.
$4.99
French Fries
994
Bacon
504
Union Rings
$1.29
Mozzar.eU -a Sticks
$2.09
Breaded Mushroom6
$1.99
Breaded Cauli6lower
$1.99
Bu66alo Wings
$3.69
Chicken Drummiea
$3.49
21 Piece Shrimp
$3.49
Fi.ah Sandwich
$3.59
Chicken Sandwich
$3.59
Chicken Stnipa
$3.59
1 Chips
694
Bevenage6
Mitk
494
Soda
794
Ct.eanly Canadian Sparkting Water
994
Chocolate Matt
994
Stnawbenny Matt
994
Van.itta Matt
994
Glass o6 Been
$1.25
Wine Cooler
$2.25
Co66ee
494
Pitcher Soda
$2.99
Pitcher Beer
$4.50
Kids Meats
(10 6 undenl
Conn Dog $1.99
HambuAgen $1.99
Chicken Stni.ps $2.49
Ate kids meala include 6ries and small beverage.
Kids Matt 494
DARK A. CARRIGAN. ESO.
ATTOIMEY At LAW
CARRIGAN LAW OFFICE
Plans: 612-587-5900
227 SOUTH MAIN
HUTCHINSON. MINNESOTA 55350
� 23, 1992 APR 1902. REC
SY
Hutchinson City Council
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
RE: Steven R. Picha d /b /a J's Pizza and.Sports Bar
Gentleperson:
I am sending you this letter in response to a request for information
submitted by Sergant Ron Kirchoff to Mr.Steven Picha and relating to
the above matter.
With regard to that matter, I understand that Mr. Picha has been
• granted a liquor license by the City of Hutchinson by Council action
on April 14, 1992.
I further understand that sometime apparently subsequent to that April
14, 1992, council action, questions have arisen relating to the
continuing role that Mr. Gene Doherty may have in Mr. Picha's proposed
restaurant and bar operation.
You should be informed that Mr. Gene Doherty is the current owner of
the building which constitutes the business premises of that
restaurant and bar and several months ago Mr. Picha and Mr. Doherty
agreed that Mr. Picha will begin operation of that restaurant and bar
if and when Mr. Picha successfully obtains a liquor license from the
City of Hutchinson.
At the time of that agreement Mr. Picha agreed to lease the business
from Mr. Doherty and Mr. Doherty would then turn over the active
operation of what is now known as J's Pizza Garten to Mr. Picha.
In that regard, Mr. Doherty began winding down the operation of J's
Pizza Garten and by corporate resolution dated April 6, 1992, Hutch
Pizza, Inc. (referred to above as J's Pizza Garten) that corporation
resolved to cease active operations in order to complete the transfer
s
•
?--D'
of the business to Mr. Picha and at that time, since Mr. Picha was a
individual with no criminal record it was anticipated that the grant
of a liquor license to Mr. Picha was imminent and, in fact, that grant
took place by council action on April 19, 1992.
J.
Given the fact that Mr. Picha conditioned his purchase of what is now
known as J's Pizza Garten upon the grant of a liquor license to him,
and given the fact that J's was an ongoing operation with continuing
liabilities and expenses (since Mr. Picha wanted to purchase an active
business rather than a defunct one), fir. Doherty was left in a
difficult situation of having to-decide whether to cease active
operations fully and finally on April 6, 1992, and then try to sell an
inactive business to Mr. Picha or continue to make payments of normal
operating expenses until Mr. Picha successfully obtained a liquor
license. Since it appeared that that grant of a liquor license was
Imminent, Mr. Doherty continued to pay normal operating expenses for
obvious reasons.
Now Mr. Picha would like to begin operation of the bar and restaurant
with the benefit of that liquor license that he has been granted
(although for whatever reason City Officials now refuse to accept Mr.
Picha's draft of 61250 for that liquor license which has already been
granted) and Mr. Doherty would like to be able to sell his business to
Mr. Picha.
Mr. Picha is attempting to earn a living and I believe that unless •
there is some compelling concern relating to Mr. Picha continued
denial of that liquor license is wrongful and damages Mr. Picha and
Mr. Doherty.
Recently Mr. Picha and I had an opportunity to speak with Sergant
Kirchoff about this matter and Mr. Kirchoff indicated that there was
some concern that Mr. Doherty continued to receive money from the
operation. While It is true that Mr. Doherty has continued to draw
receipts from the business, that has been necessary to allow Mr.
Doherty to use those funds to pay expenses which continue to accrue
until this liquor license problem can be addressed.
In addition, and while certain individuals have questioned the
propriety of this conduct, I frankly cannot understand how Mr. Doherty
could continue to maintain an active operation without paying normal
operating expenses as they accrue. Moreover, even though Mr. Doherty
projected a termination of active operation of Hutch Pizza, Inc., on
or about April 6, 1992, when that day came and passed and Mr. Doherty
consulted me about the payment of normal operating expenses, despite
the corporate resolution ceasing operations on April 6, 1992,
•
0
•
I advised Mr. Doherty that I thought it would be prudent, moral, just
and plain old common sense to make payment of his debts as they cane
due pending the outoome of Mr. Picha's liquor license application.
Mr. Picha and Mr. Doherty both appreciate the city coucil's concern
relating to the grant of a liquor license to anyone and they
recognized that as a proper governmental function, however, both Mr.
Doherty and Mr. Picha believe that the grant of -a liquor license
absent compelling reasons for its denial, should be made in order to
allow Mr. Doherty to sell his business and in order to allow Mr. Picha
to make a living.
I personally believe that the city acted appropriately when it granted
a liquor license to Mr. Picha and it acted improperly when city
officials refused to accept Mr. Picha's $250 as payment for that
license without any legal Justification.
benefit of a liquor license since the council has continuing
Jurisdiction over this matter and since any future compelling problems
can be addressed by a revocation of that license.
I urge you to allow Mr. Picha to operate that business with the
Mr. Doherty would like to sell his business and Mr. Picha would like
to earn a living.
Will the council finally take steps to put
allowing Mr. Picha to obtain that license
problems and damages relating to delays in
license can also be put to rest?
Sincerely,
Mark A. Carrigan
MAC /kJh
this matter to rest by
and so that continuing
the issuance of that
•
0
•
C
April 21, 1992
Mr. Steve Picha
1035 Texas Avenue
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Picha:
The list below outlines the items to be corrected at J's Pizza, 16 Main Street
N., Hutchinson, MN within the specified time frame.
1) General clean up - immediate
2) Airgap ice cooler in basement - immediate
3) Install backflow preventers on pop and beer cabonators - immediate
4) Cap water well in basement - October 1, 1992
5) Protect and secure all electrical panels, ,junction boxes and
receptacles - May 1, 1992
6) Install exit lights and verify operation of emergency
lights - May 1, 1992
7) Install closures on bathroom doors - May 1, 1992
8) Vent kitchen plumbing fixtures - May 1, 1992
9) Compliance as per direction of Mr. Sheldon Christensen,
MN Dept. of Health - immediate
10) Compliance with Hutchinson liquor license conditions - immediate
11) General cleanup of basement - six months
Your cooperation of temporary closing and cleanup is very much appreciated.
Best regards,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
es G. Marka
JGM /mms
cc: Steve Madson, Chief of Police
+Gary Plotz, City Administrator
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
Sheldon Christenson, MN Dept of Health
City Hall Parks fr Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Pnnfed on recpded paper-
intoxicating un -sale lasses. uu
APPLICATION FOR ON -BALE IMTORICATINC LIQUOR LICENSE
• V
V
This form was prepared by the City of Hutchinson and the Minomota
Bureau of CriMinal Apprehension, Department of Publio safety, puraeent
to Minnesota Statutes, 1976, section 340.13, for purposes of bads-
. 1 ground investigation. It doss not supercede any Iwo, rules or
regulations of the Division of Liquor Control regarding the issuance
of liquor licenses. Failure to provide information requested my
result in denial of the applioaticn.
I. S -TS Lane MAAe,A IG. 1993
Trade N Date of Application
z. Ap(L L IS } 'C'
Licensing Period
3. Type of Application
f�, ® New Renewal r-1 Transfer .
4. SAe.uE 1J �. YZ.c 1 A _547 -0
Name of Applicant Phone
5 . 1035 - Ve)A $ Ave
Home Address
6. Citizenship, aMept".)
7 . _L oi.s. '7-4 -so
Place f Birth Date of Birth
Address of Business Location
9• NCB\ 0ucll:ea��`fa 1_ t, CoT4 U��ock �O TDw+ OF 11 J7C��yfgl UnrT N
Legal Desorip[LOn /�+
10. List owners of building or precise to be licensed, G �QAJf -
L1n 4rnT `/
11. List all partners, officers or directors, if corporation,
Name
Address
Date of Birth
13. Prior experience in this type of business, 5,, H n ,nr.� r n F LLQ,,a[
2.1 £waT ReTl..l_�h/u. �:na. 2V
13. Present ownership in any other liquor establishnent,
14. Present ownership in any other restaurant or food business,
15. Three Business References Y FiecEn 1L - LO.t9 ?64E If -scAL' '166- 6006
q0 Li Vgllr. 'go Of 9, LL Aam 1 -B0D- 261 -960U
M APZ 4'6 r�u.w g: uc a la.nl.`.Jc K 2 orm)
^ Sal -7SO3
16. 1 0. r- O. 7
Corporate or Partnership Title
•
9-'�>I
r
}'- 17. �` 1Je_ N A2A1
Corporate or Partnership Address
1S. If this is ■ transfer application give nmo address, of persons, partnership or
corporation holding license for the Peet year.
19. Who owns the bar /tavern fixturea7 42, ZA) A- AA
20. Are you a Minnesota resident? ®' Yes 0 No 7-450 Ni
From To
If not, where resident? Dates of Residency
21. Residential Address during past Five (5) Yeara, j Z acx'7bq U..D,or Q MAI 3, -
IU3- 161 °0 Lx is P NNE 3. I6 A)e Na b I �i _O-S HAI
r7D.S pp ID h, -n ilr
22. Three Personal References, A I)DDra T. V_h'zlCAk i19I -1131 ha 7 L--'ono
( 1pu , L Db�em'r�4
23. Employment for the Past Five Yaws, F Doe WAV ?h.n� 10,I ar
Sa t9 +� 51. N.W1 ke.� Baz Ua.) Nu.
1
• 1 ,_ 12 A G' A aTr AI / / 2 Vat
1, ii_ lA.._N cT
J
24. Any Convictions Other Than Minor Traffic,
25. This application must be accompanied by detailed statement of net worth and last year's
tax return and statement of method of payment for business, fixtures and inventory.
26. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all the
Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of.intoxicating
liquor, rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Control Cosssissioner, and
all ordinances of the municipality, and I hereby certify that I have read the fore-
going questions and that the ""era to said questions are true of cry own knowledge.
I further understand that an investigation fee not to exceed $500.00 shall be charged
an applicant by the city or county if the investigation is conducted within the state,
or the cost not to exceed $10,000.00 if the investigation is required outside the
state. I further understand the ordinances of the City of Hutchinson regarding the
operation of on -sale liquor licenses and agree to mabidby h em.
5 gnature of Applicant
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
day of 19_
(Notary Public)
My Commission Expires:
04/10/02 15:30 01 002 067 4433 GJ SULLIVAN OF A qbUO2
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP TRUCK INSURANCE EXCHANGE
THE SPECIAL RESTAURANT PACXAGE
CERTIFICATE AS TO EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE
LIQUOR LIABILITY
THIS IS NOT AN INSURANCE POLICY. THIS IS ONLY A VERIFICATION OF INSURANCE,
IT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY AMEND, EXTEND, OR ALTER THE COVERAGE PROVIDED BY THE
POLICY.
LOSS, IF ANY, TO BE ADJUSTED ONLY WITH THE INSURED NAMED HERE IN AND PAYABLE TO
THE INSURED AND THE INTERESTED PARTY NAMED BELOW, AS THEIR INTEREST MAY
APPEAR.
POLICY INFORMATION
POLICY NO.60123 -84 -00 STEVEN.R. PICHA
EFFECTIVE FROM: 04/30/92 DBA: J'S PIZZA-AND SPORTS BAR
TO: 04/30/93 16 MAIN ST. N.
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
LIMIT OF INSURANCE OR LIMIT OF LIABILITY
B U S I N E S S L I A B I L I T Y
LIABILITY $ 300,000
LIQUOR LAW LIABILITY $ 300,000
CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO:
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
UPON CANCELLATION OR TERMINATION OF THIS POLICY FOR ANY CAUSE, ADVANCE NOTICE
IN WRITING WILL BE SENT 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED.
THIS CERTIFICATE SUPERCEDES ANY PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CERTIFICTATE.
0
P'
0
MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF HUTCH PIZZA, INC.
lil
Held on the sixth day of January, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. to accept the resignations of Gene
Doherty and Barbara Doherty.
On motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was unanimously
adopted:
Resolved that the resignation of Gene Doherty and Barbara Doherty be
accepted.
On motion duly made and seconded, the following resolution was unanimously
• adopted:
Resolved that Steve Picha shall be made a member of the Board and elected
to the position of President of Hutch Pizza, Inc.
On motion duly made and carried, the meeting was adjourned.
Secretary
•
9 �.
AFFIDAVIT OF GENE L. DOHERTY
Affiant, Gene L. Doherty, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes
and says:
1. That Affiant prepares this Affidavit in connection withThis
application to the City of Hutchinson for a liquor license.
2. That, in that regard, Affiant states that neither he nor his wife,
Barbara Doherty, own any stock nor have any involvement with
Hutchinson Pizza, Inc..
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
Dated: March 19, 1992 C¢e.. 0 , L&
Gene L. Doherty - fiant
Subscribed and sworn before me
this 19th day of March, 1992.
"U1 , U,1'
Notary P b1c
J (W T1 1iTYl1 .IAME NEitEPoCK � 000NTY oowruox w� 6yam
1W
ri
9 --�).
MINUTES OF HUTCH PIZZA, INC.
16 North Main
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
On the 3rd day of April, 1992, at 5:00 p.m. at 16 North Main,
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350, a special meeting of the Board of
Directors of Hutch Pizza, Inc. was held at which time the Officers of
the Corporation, Barbara Doherty, Gene Doherty, and Warren Marmorine
met for the purpose of adopting a resolution relating to the
termination of active operations of the Corporation.
Gene Doherty moved that the Corporation Hutch Pizza, Inc. cease
all active operations as of April 6, 1992, and this Motion was duly
considered and unanimously approved by Barbara Doherty, Gene Doherty
and Warren Marmorine.
Dated: April 3, 1992
Gene Doherty - P ident
Hutch Pizza, I
Subscribed and sworn before me
•
this 3rd day of April 1992.
QUmpa
r �
•
9 -D�
Apri': 22, 1992
C
MEMO
TO: MAY & CITY COUNCIL
FR OM: KEN MERRILL, FINANC D IRECTO R__ -
SUBJEC 1992 ADJUSTMENTS GENERAL FUND BUDGET
We understand the governor will be signing the 1992 tax bill which
adjusts for the State's shortfall of 1992. As you recall the
original message the city received was proposing a reduction in LGA
(local government aids) of $321,000.
The bill passed by the legislature has changed the method of
balancing the budget. LGA will not be cut, but rather cities will
• now have to pay sale tax. The 6 1/2% adjustment of expenses will
be implemented and affect all funds. We are not sure of the date
of implementation either June 1, 1992 or July 1, 1992 is
anticipated.
We had earlier estimated the sales tax cost to the General Fund to
be about 36,000 based upon 1991 numbers for the entire year.
Depending on capital expenditures the number is therefore estimated
at $18,000.
We have discussed, at a special City Council Workshop, a list of
proposed cuts (which are attached) as possible reductions to
balance the budget. The City Council also had earlier approved
several actions at the March 10, 1992 meeting (see attached memo).
With action of the State now almost a sure thing, we would propose
the following action:
1. Reductions as proposed by City Directors would be set aside.
2. All actions of the March 10 meeting would be rescinded
* Budgeted Capital expenditures would be released
* Additional personnel budget would be released
* Expenditures as authorized by the budget would be
released.
* Merit and longevity pay would be reinstated and
• retroactive to employee anniversary date.
City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on wcyded paper -
Page 2 •
3. Cost of Sales tax increases would be authorized first from
department budgets, if sufficient dollars are not available
dollars would be made available from any additional re,enues
ccllected in 1992. If those revenue sources are not sufficient
the costs would be authorizec from cont ,ngenc, dollars cf the
General Fund.
4. The city council would look at cost of living adjustment at
this time. Possibly handing this discussion in the same
manner as previous cost of living adjustments by use of the
employee committee and acted upon at the next regular city
council meeting.
We do have two other items of concern in the General Fund for 1992.
We are working with the County in regard to the $65,000 budget for
reimbursement from McLeod County for police dispatch operations.
We have received a retrc workers compensation adjustment for the
1990 -1991 year. Total cost is some $121,000: the General Fund cost
is est� mated to be $17,000. Tnis amount was not budgeted.
If you need any additional information please give me a call, 1
will at the meeting to Discuss th memo and answer any questions.
•
•
r]
L
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1992 BUDGET CUTS
PER CITY DIRECTORS MEMOS
RECREATION ADMINISTRATION
190,930
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
(5,700)
(5,700)
185,230
RECREATION
185,230
TEMP WAGES
(3,000)
182,230
0. T. WAGES
(1,000)
181,230
Equipment
(500)
180,730
Supplies
(1,000)
179,730
(5,500)
179,730
SENIOR CENTER
179,730
Travel
(200)
179,530
EQUIPMENT
(300)
(500)
179,230
CIVIC ARENA
179,230
TEMP WAGES
(2,000)
(2,000)
177,230
PARK
177,230
TEMP WAGE
(10,000)
167,230
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
(38,000)
129,230
(48,000)
129,230
RECREATION BULDG
129,230
Capital equip.
(500)
128,730
(500)
128,730
AIRPORT
128,730
TEMP WAGE
(1
127,730
(1
127,730
TRANSIT
127,730
Dispatch time & 1 bus
only (512)
(512)
127,218
certain hours $1,280
40%
127,218
------------
- - - - --
127,218
(193,782)(193,782)
q' E- t
March 6, 1992
MEMO
TO: MAYOR 8 CITY COUNCIL
FROM: GARY PLOTZ CITY ADMINISTRATOR b
KEN MERRILL FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 1992 BUDGET SHORTFALL
As we all are aware the State of Minnesota revenue forecast are
showing another major revenue shortfall. The numbers being
discussed are over $500,000,000 and discussion of cuts necessary or
taxes increased are prevalent.
It would appear Hutchinson as well as other cities, schools,
counties, and state agencies are headed for cuts again this year.
We have read of percentages of over 7 percent of all agencies to
make up this revenue shortfall.
Our General Fund budget calls for local government aids of
$1.032,179 for 1992. A 7 percent cut would equal $72,000. The cut
could also apply to HACA and disparity aids for 1992. According to
a report received from the State of Minnesota in 1991 we were
programmed to receive $1,105,100. A 7 percent reduction of this
would equal $77,000. If the cut is applied to HACA and equalization
aid the revenue loss would affect our debt service funds.
In addition the city budget anticipated $65,000 to be received from
McLeod County for dispatch operations. This matter has yet to be
resolved.
It all adds up to potentially large deficit for 1992. The amount
of deficit will be unknown until probably late April, May or
possibly June. A situation which would give us a lot of problems
if the city would wait 6 months into the budget.
We would recommend to the city council the following:
1. Freeze all capital purchases with an exception being given for
budgeted computers and SCBA updates. (The computer purchases
will help office efficiency and help in time completion of
scheduled projects.) We would review with the City Council if
capitals purchases involve life and safety needs.
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
3714'ashington Az Nest 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
•
•
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Printed on mcvcled rarer F t
0
11
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON 1992 BUDGET CUTS
PER CITY DIRECTORS MEMOS
BUDGET CUTS $
1992
MAYOR X COUNCIL
Roll Back Salary
Travel
Meeting
CITY .ADM.
Office Supplies
Postage
Misc.
FINANCE
rajoul
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Misc rental etc
DOLLARS
(6 mos) (1,844)
(1,500)
(4,500) (7,844)
(400)
(1,200)
(175) (1,775)
(17,000)
(500) (17,500)
Reg Wages
o t wages
Cleaning Supplies
Clothing
Travel School & conf
Portable Radio
FIRE DEPT
Equipment
Revenue
ENGINEER
Office Supplies
CAPITAL OUTLAY
Temp Wages
STREET
TEMP WAGES
Street Maintenance
Signs & Stripping
MAINTENANCE
Contract R & M
CEMETERY
Capital Equpment
CITY HALL
Central Garage Repair
(64,826)
(1,950)
(250)
(500)
(1,500)
(3,000)
(72,026)
(1,975)
(750)
(2,725)
(200)
(1,000)
(3,000)
(4,200)
(4,000)
(6,000)
(2,000)
(12,000)
(4,000)
(4,000)
(7,000)
(7,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
21,000
319,156
317,656
313,156
313,156
312,756
311,556
311,381
311,381
294,381
293,881
293,881
229,055
227,105
226,855
226,355
2 24,855
221,855
2 ^_1,855
221,855
219,880
219,130
2 19, 130
219,130
218,930
217,930
214,930
214,930
214,930
214,930
210,930
204,930
202,930
202,930
202,930
198,930
198,930
198,930
191,930
191,930
191,930
190,930
190,930
947 I
1. License Requirement, This subdivision would require that
no person may haul or convey refuse from any premises or
businesses in the City, except for the person's own
refuse, without a valid license. We may wish to consider
whether or not we wish to license each individual
vehicle.
2. License Fee. The license fee will be set on an annual
basis by the City Council and the term of the license
shall run from January 1 through December 31 on an annual
basis.
i
' CERIIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPATE BAR ASSOCIATION
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
ILTm s. AANOI AT oRNEYs AT LAW a
Or OO6ESn
io
OANT a. WDOITELL 10 PARS PLACE
w.C"EMN
3TiVEM A. ANDERSON
RAYMOND C. I..I.LIEa
O. BARRY ANDEEDON' HuTCHSNSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -0'363
PAM Y. BEOLCB
STEVEN S. HOOE
(812) 587 -7575
CHARLES ■.CAEMICRAEL"
"DL E. rRETLAND
DAVID A. BRDEOOEMANN FA (SM) "7 -4096
m6N CEDAR L E ROAD
PAM D. DOVE
MINNEAPOLIS,MD SOTA 5'"16
(612) 545-9000
JOSEPH M. PAIEMENT RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G BABHY AND£ASON
MV TOLL FREE 600-343-4535
J AI[85 =LET
PAE(6C2)545- V93
EICHAHiI O. MCOEE
TIMOTHY W. FA N9El - —
3013013TH rOt1ETH STREET
MA1R E. HORROCES _
_PBINCMON, MINNESOTA 55371
(619) 369 -2214
CATHRYN D -REHEB
raz 16D1) 569 -5506
April 24, 1992
2P '-90
a L E27
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
r_
37 Washington Avenue West
o P.£OEIV ED
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
IC
Re: Licensing of Garbage Haulers
c,
�
1992 Refuse Contract Issues
Our File No. 3188 -92212
Dear Gary:
•
This correspondence will set out the rough draft of
the proposed
licensing program. In view of all of the issues, and the opinions
involved with the licensing of garbage haulers,
I thought it
appropriate to prepare this rough draft and then have the final
draft approved at our first meeting in May. For that
matter, if
agreement has been reached on the terms of the licensing ordinance,
the first and second readings could both be in May.
In my view, the licensing ordinance should include
the following
provisions:
1. License Requirement, This subdivision would require that
no person may haul or convey refuse from any premises or
businesses in the City, except for the person's own
refuse, without a valid license. We may wish to consider
whether or not we wish to license each individual
vehicle.
2. License Fee. The license fee will be set on an annual
basis by the City Council and the term of the license
shall run from January 1 through December 31 on an annual
basis.
i
' CERIIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
'CERTIFIED AS A HEAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA SPATE BAR ASSOCIATION
3. ADplications. The application form shall be approved by
the City Council and say be changed from time to time by
the CODUCil. This subdivision will also include some of
the standards to considered by the City council,—OF
public need, convenience, good order, ability to perform
on the part of the applicant, a commitment to comply with
all rules and regulations of the City.
4. Number of Licenses The statute does not restrict the
number of licenses the City can issue. I assume the City
will license an unlimited number of haulers for
commercial purposes and one - hauler for residential
purposes.
5. Disposal of Refuse. This subdivision will require the
appropriate and safe disposal of refuse, presumably in
a landfill.
6. FreauenCV of Collection_ I assume we will specify that
commercial collection shall be as often as necessary so
as to avoid the creation of. a nuisance. Residential
collection will be addressed in the organized collection
ordinance adopted on October 1.
7. Insurance. Liability insurance on the vehicles operated
by the licensee shall be required in the amount of
municipal tort liability as set by Chapter 466 of
Minnesota Statutes.
8. Recycling. The licensee will be required to comply with 0
all recycling requirements set forth by the City of
Hutchinson. I am unclear at the present time whether
businesses are recycling as well, but a general statement
requiring compliance with our recycling provisions should
be satisfactory.
9. Prohibitive Materials, Prohibitive materials will
include grass clippings, yard waste, hazardous waste and
such other material as the Council may by resolution
include from time to time.
Please give these issues some consideration. If there should be
additional terms that should be included in the licensing statute,
please contact me.
I.
Thank you. Best regards.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
&4z •
'G. Barry Ande
GBA:lm
C
M E M O R A N D U M
April 22, 1992
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Advertisement for Bid -- Interim Refuse Service
July 1, 1992 - October 1, 1992
Based on recent state legislature changes, the City Attorney has
• notified the City they can move forward to advertise for refuse
hauling bids for interim service starting July 1, 1992 through
October 1, 1992. Accordingly, I have put this on the City Council
agenda for the April 28 regular Council meeting at 7:30 P.M.
Also, please be aware of the attached April 15 letter from Barry
Anderson to Junker's attorney asking Junker again to submit a
proposal. At this time, I am D!2t aware of any proposal(s)
submitted to date. Please note the May 15 deadline.
/mj s
cc: James Junker, Junker Sanitation
Atty. John Cairns, Briggs & Morgan;
Attorney for James Junker
G. Barry Anderson, City Atty.
City Refuse Contract Committee
City Solid waste Management Committee
•
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks &Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled taper
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9- G
Y
DAVID H. ARROLD
GARY D. M•DO1I "
Rrsvv A. ANDRRRCM
9.3LAHRr A31mawwH
6TEVRN S. RODE
1AVRA E. PREITJIID
DAV:D A. RRIIEOOEMAI7N
PAUL D. DOVE ••
JDS2PR X. PASRMENT
JAMEs DTLEY
3ICRA3D O. McOEE
CATX%" D. REHER
April 15, 1992
ARN OLD & MCDOWELL
ATToRNEYs AT Lww
asst Cana= Iraq RoaD
MnlNY.AMLTe, XnFXZsorA 55410 -1492
(612) 545 -9000
MN You MzE 900- 940 - 4545
PAX (612) 5 5 -1799
APR 1992
RECEIVED
BY
John Cairns
Briggs and Morgan Law Firm
80 South Eighth Street, #2400
Minneapolis, MN 55402
W mmnsa
WRI " V. CAU ZO r
RAYMOIID C. • ALLM2 •
PAUL W.2"
C ZARLSS R. CARM ICH►EL"
SM SOOTR SODR7H STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55971
(614)969 -2914
PAE (6N1) 969 -5306
IOI PARE PUCE
HDTCRINSOR, MINNE60IA 55950
(am) 567 -7575
PAE (6@) 567 -4095
Re: ' Junker Sanitary Services, Inc. v. City of Hutchinson
Our File No. 3244 -87005
Dear John:
This letter is to advise you that I have heard nothing further
since our telephone conversation on Sunday, April 5, 1992 when you •
confirmed that our previously scheduled meeting had been scheduled.
As you know, the City of Hutchinson has been waiting patiently for
a proposal, any proposal, from Mr. Junker since you and I first
discussed this matter now almost two months ago.
The City Council has asked me to advise you that if they do not
hear from Junker by the 15th of May, they will have to assume he
has no interest in pursuing any further contract with the city and
the city will need to make alternative arrangements.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
ARNOLD LL
4
G. Barry Anderson
GBA /pb
cc: Gary D �J
oos- izr:)i .�
•
'CE2TIPIED As A CIVIL TRIAL S PECIALIST RY THE XTNNZAOTJ STATE EAR ASSOCIATIOX
''CERT "= AS A REAL PROPERTY LM SPECIALIST aY THE MINNESOTA 4TATi EAR A"M" TON
DATE:
TO:
NI:I4JV9A
SUBJECT:
and City Council
1 23. 1992
Randy De Vries
Advertise for b o a combination jet and vacuum truck
I request the Hutchinson City Council advertise for bids
on either a 1991 or 1992 demo -unit or a new production
model combination jet and vacuum truck.
• Doug Meier and myself will be working on a specification
for this unit. This truck was budgeted for the 1992 year.
RD /ds
11
City Hall Parks & Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recVcleApaper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -22
/ �Jl
V•
M E M O R A N D U M
April 22, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Discussion of Hutchinson Area Transportation Services
Facility Report
The preliminary report for the feasibility of a combined
city /county /state maintenance facility has been completed by WOLD
Architects. Larry Hoben of MnDOT and Rick Kjonaas of McLeod County
will be at the meeting to discuss the results.
The next step in this process would be to determine all site needs,
review the possibility of other collocation of agencies, and select
a site. I have noted to Larry and Rick that the original interest
by the City was due to the need to consolidate our Park and
Recreation equipment at a site near or in the Street Garage area.
In this respect, I feel that the City owned site between the
Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Composting area offers the
best potential of serving our needs. Some County Commissioners
appear to be supporting a site adjacent to the Fair Grounds.
Although this appears to be a very good site for a stand -alone
facility serving the County and State, it does not meet the City's
goal of consolidating our own facilities.
At this point we would like to have the authority to proceed with
potential site selection, and begin reviewing site layout, and the
financial and operation alternatives.
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
/ `/
•
•
CITY OF HUTCHDMOG
• 37 WASIEDETON AVENUE WEST
MTfCHMMU, MN 55350
E NGIINffit'S REPORT
DATE: April 22, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Letting No. 9, Project No. 92 -14 & 92 -15
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible
and recommend it be constructed. If acceptable, I recommend a hearing be held
on the 12th day of May, 1992.
Project No. 92 -14: Golf View Court from 8th Avenue N.W. to North by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain,
services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances;
and
Project No. 92 -15: 4th Avenue N.E. from Bluff Street to High Street by
• construction of bituminous surfacing, drain tile and
appurtenances.
Construction Cost $ 81,400.00
Engineering /Administration $ 11,400.00
Fiscal /Legal /Capitalized Interest $ 6,510.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL ------------------------- - - - - -- $ 99,310.00
Assessable Cost $ 70,460.00
Deferred Assessable Cost S 0.00
City Bonded S 28,850.00
City Other Funds $ 0.00
MSA $ 0.00
MNDOT $ 0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL ----- -- ----- ------------- - - - - -- $ 99,310.00
JPR /pv
r1
U
9 Z.
RESOLuTJOg 11D. 9699
RESOLUTION ORDffitDE PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT .
LETTDIG NO. 9
PROJECT NO. 92 -14 & 92 -15
WHEREAS, it is proposed to make the following improvements:
Project No. 92 -14 Golf View Court from Sth Avenue N.W. to the North by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, watermain,
services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances;
Project No. 92 -15 4th Avenue N.E. from Bluff Street to High Street by
construction of bituminous surfacing, drain tile and
appurtenances;
WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429,
NOW, THIs7tMM, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIW OF
HUTCHINSON, F@INESOTA:
THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering •
for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient
speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed
improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or
in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the
improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
A
9' k
�
• RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON
LETTING NO. 9
PROJECT NO. 92 -14 & 92 -15
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted April 28th, 1992,
a report has been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the
following improvements:
Project No. 92 -14: Golf View Court from 8th Avenue N.W. to North by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer,
watermain, services, grading, gravel base, curb
and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing
and appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -15: 4th Avenue N.W. from Bluff Street to High Street
by construction of bituminous surfacing, drain
tile and appurtenances,
and said report was received by the Council on April 28th, 1992.
NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HITPCHINSON, F1101ESOTA.
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in
• accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefitted property for all or
a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $99,310.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the
12th day of May, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City of Hutchinson at 8100
P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and
improvements as required by law.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
9 -/-
RESOLUTION NO. 9701
• RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 4
PROJECT NO. 92 -07
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications
for the improvement of First Avenue N.E. from Hassan Street to Adams Street by
the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, sewer service, watermain, water
service, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Administrator shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the
official newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such
improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall
state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 p.m. on May 22nd, 1992, in the
Council Chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and Director of
• Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council on
June 23rd, 1992, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid
will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of
responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City
Administrator and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or
certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 10 percent of the amount
of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
9 m,
Z 1; I 11 ND 970
1 I II EEC COST TO W ASSESSED AND
GROCRIM ' +' 11.' OF ' [' 1:•: 1 AI
ASSESS M T BOLL RD. 275A
LETT NO
�-X - 1
WIEREA,S, cost has been determined for the improvement of Roberts Road from
Dale Street to School Road by construction of watermain, storm sewer, grading,
gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid
price for such improvement is $ 319,319.90, and the expenses incurred or to be
incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $70,030.38, so that the
total cost of the improvement will be $388,350.28.
M 11.'+'1. 11 I I:•ti1
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $308,438.07, and the portion of the cost to be assessed
against benefitted property owners is declared to be S79,912.21.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Monday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of
6.2 (+ or -) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of •
Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within
the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Mayor
City Administrator
A
r
RESOLUTION 7 • 970
LETT RESOLUTION FOR HEARDE ON PROPOSED ASSESMW
ASSESSMENT BOLL MD. 275A
1
PRD NO 1
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 28th day of April,
1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment
of the cost of improving Roberts Road from Dale Street to School Road by
construction of watermain, storm sewer, grading, gravel base, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and
WHEREAS the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such
proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection;
NOW, T}MU21ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, lffHNfSOTA.
1. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of May, 1992, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the
• total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to
the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks
prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the
City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid October 1st, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the
City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Mayor
is City Administrator
I�
RESOdMr= YD. 9704
RE90LUTIM DECLABIM COST TO BE ASSOM) AND
ORDERM !REPARATION OF PROPOSED ASEESSMOP!
ASSES BOLL NO. 2758 •
L11TrM ND. 1
PROJECT MS. 92-03 & 92-04
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of:
Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel
Street by construction of sanitary sewer and services,
watermain and services, street improvements and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts
Road by construction of sanitary sewer and services,
watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel
base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances;
and the bid price for such improvement is $86,149.10, and the expenses incurred
or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $18,952.80, so that
the total cost of the improvement will be $105,101.90.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUMCM OF THE CITY OF
HLMCHI LSON, BAs
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is
hereby declared to be $0.00, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against
benefitted property owners is declared to be $105,101.90. •
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or
before the first Honday in January, 1993, and shall bear interest at the rate of
6.2 (+ or -) percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment
resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of
Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed
for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within
the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed
assessment, notify the Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
Hayor
City Administrator
•
/
RESOLUTION 110. 9705
RESOLUTION FOR HEARDE ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 275E
LETTING NO. 1
• PROJECT NOS. 92 -03 & 92-04
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 28th day of April,
1992, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment
of the cost of improving:
Project No. 92 -03 Priebe Addition from Betker's 2nd Addition to Goebel
Street by construction of sanitary sewer and services,
watermain and services, street improvements and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 92 -04 Betker's 2nd Addition - Hidden Circle, South of Roberts
Road by construction of sanitary sewer and services,
watermain and services, storm sewer, grading, gravel
base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such
proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public
inspection;
NOW, TfERM?ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCM OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, N 3INESOTA:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 12th day of Hay, 1992, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 8:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment and at
• such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvement will
be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment.
2. The City Administrator is hereby directed to cause a notice of the
hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper
at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the
total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to
the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks
prior to the hearing.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to
certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the
assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the
City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire
assessment is paid October 1st, 1992. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the
City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through
December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 28th day of April, 1992.
J
Mayor
City Administrator
9 �-
C
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Consideration of Awarding Letting No. 1 /Part B
Project No. 92 -03, Priebe Addition
Project No. 92 -04, Betker's 2nd Addition
The Public Hearing for Part A of the Project (Project 92 -01,
Roberts Road) is scheduled for May 12, 1992. Pending receipt of
waivers from the developer /owner of each property, and
acknowledgement and willingness to proceed by William Mueller &
Sons, Inc., the low bidder on the project, we would like to have
the ability to begin work on this portion of the project.
We recommend awarding Letting No. 1, Part A- Division I (Watermain)
and Part B (Priebe and Betker's 2nd Additions) contingent on
receipt of the following:
.Waiver of hearing from all property owners /developers
►Letter stating willingness to proceed without award of Part
A- Division II (Roberts Road construction) from William
Mueller & Sons, Inc.
►Resolution Awarding Letting No. 1, Part A- Division I, and
Part B in the amount of $108,483.10
City Hall Parks lr Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2
1]
0
M E M O R A N D U M
April 22, 1992
C
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Consideration of Approving MnDOT Traffic Control Signal
Agreement for Letting No. 5 /Project No. 92 -08 /Main Street
(TH 15) Traffic Control and Signal Improvements
Attached is a copy of the proposed Agreement (MnDOT # 69321)
regarding the above referenced project. This project involves
removal of existing traffic control signals and installation of new
traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect and
signing construction at 1st Avenue North (new), Washington Avenue
(replace) and 2nd Avenue South (replace).
MnDOT cost sharing policy for traffic signals involves the City
• paying for a percentage of the cost based on the number of
intersections involved, for example:
► 1st Avenue North has 2 state controlled portions (Main
Street North and South) and the City has 2 (1st Avenue NE
and 1st Avenue NW) so the cost sharing is 50% each
► Washington Avenue has 3 state controlled portions (TH 15
North and South, and TH 22) and the City has 1 (Washington
Avenue West) so the City pays 25% and the state 75%
► 2nd Avenue South has 2 state controlled portions (TH 15
North and South) and the City has 2 (2nd Avenue SE and SW)
so each pays 50%
Of the estimated City share of $116,600.95, 4 of the 5
intersections are on state -aid routes, therefore the City's State
Aid fund can pay for $93,280. We had estimated the City's share at
$80,000 so this amount came as somewhat of a shock, however the
final cost will be based on the actual bid, which will probably be
somewhere in between the two numbers.
We recommend approving entering into an agreement with the State as
noted in the Agreement.
• City Hall Parks &Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Printed on recycled paper -
M E M O R A N D U M
April 22, 1992
DEPARTMENT TRANSPORTATION - Room 317
Office of Traffic Engineering
STATE OF MINNESOU
Office Memorandum
DATE : April 14, 1992
To : Keith Voss •
District Traffic Engineer
District 8
FROM Sue Schwartz, Lighting Enginee
Office of Traffic Engineering
PHONE: (612) 296 -6997
SUBJECT Traffic Control Signal
Agreement No. 69321
With City of Hutchinson
S.P. 4304 -40
Attached are three copies of an agreement between the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation, and the City of Hutchinson
covering the cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control
signals on T.H. 15 (Main St. S.) at C.S.A.H. 7 (2nd Ave. S.W.) -
C.S.A.H. 25 (2nd Ave. S.E.), on T.H. 15 (Main St. S.)-
T.H.15/T.H.22 (Main St. S.) at T.H. 22 (Washington Ave.) -
Washington Ave., and on T.H. 15 /T.H. 22 (Main St. S.) at 1st Ave.
N.W.- 1st Ave. N.E. in Hutchinson.
Kindly review the agreement, and, if approved, arrange to have it •
presented to the proper officials for execution on behalf of the
City. They should be advised to sign all copies of the agreement,
making sure to affix the corporate seal to all copies thereof and
to all copies of the resolution.
To expedite matters, the agreement should be returned to you for
signature by the District Engineer under "Recommended for
Approval ", after which all copies are to be returned to Richard
Pientka for further execution on behalf of the Department. A copy
of the fully executed agreement will be returned to you for your
files, and an executed agreement will be sent to the City of
Hutchinson.
Attachments:
Agreement (3)
cc: Dave Trooien
G. Kopacek
R. W. Pientka
I �
9
MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL
AGREEMENT NO. 69321
BETWEEN
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
TO
•
I]
Remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new
Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Interconnect and
Signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County
State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid
Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and on Trunk Highway No.
15 (Main Street South) - Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No.
22 (Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington
Avenue) - Washington Avenue; and Install a new Traffic Control
Signal with Street Lights, Interconnect and Signing on Trunk
Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st
Avenue Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast in Hutchinson, McLeod
County, Minnesota.
S.P. 4304 -40
Prepared by Traffic Engineering
ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE
City of Hutchinson $116.600.95
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
None
Otherwise Covered
9 -�.
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the
State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter
referred to as the "State ", and the City of Hutchinson,
hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 161.20 authorizes the
Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of
constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system;
and
WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is
justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove
the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic
control signals with street lights, interconnect and signing on •
Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at County State Aid
Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway
No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main
Street South) - Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main
Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) -
Washington Avenue; and install a new traffic control signal with
street lights, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No.
15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue
Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast; and
69321 •
- 2 -
0
WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest
for the State to provide one (1) master controller and three (3)
new cabinets and control equipment to operate said traffic
control signals; and
WHEREAS, the City and State will participate in the
cost, maintenance and operation of the traffic control signals
with street lights, interconnect and signing as hereinafter set
forth;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan,
specifications and proposal which shall constitute "Preliminary
Engineering ". The State shall also perform the construction
• inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set
forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and
shall be so referred to hereinafter.
2. The contract cost of the work or, if the work is
not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment
rental required to complete the work, except the cost of
providing the power supply to the service poles or pads, shall
constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so
referred to hereinafter.
3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by
contract shall perform the traffic control signal work provided
• 69321
- 3 -
for under State Project No. 4304 -40 with the Construction Costs
shared as follows:
a. Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at
County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue
Southwest) - County State Aid Highway No. 25
(2nd Avenue Southeast). System "A ". Remove
the existing traffic control signal and
install a new traffic control signal with
street lights. Estimated Construction Cost
is $78,000.00 which includes State furnished
materials. Anticipated State's share is 50
percent. City's share is 50 percent.
b. Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - •
Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22
(Main Street South) at Trunk Highway No. 22
(Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue.
System "B ". Remove the existing traffic
control signal and install a new traffic
control signal with street lights. Estimated
Construction Cost is $79,000.00 which
includes State furnished materials.
Anticipated State's share is 75 percent.
City's share is 25 percent.
69321 •
- 4 -
n
U
C. Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22
(Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest -
1st Avenue Northeast. System "C ". Install a
new traffic control signal with street
lights. Estimated Construction Cost is
$80,000.00 which includes State furnished
materials. Anticipated State's share is 50
percent. City's share is 50 percent.
d. On Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South)
from County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd
Avenue Southwest) - County State Aid Highway
No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast) to 1st Avenue
• Northwest - 1st Avenue Northeast. Install
interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is
$27,000.00 which includes State furnished
materials. Anticipated State's share is
58.33 percent. City's share is 41.67
percent.
4. The State shall install or cause the installation
of overhead signing and shall maintain said signing all to no
cost to the City.
5. Upon execution of this agreement and a request in
writing by the State, the City shall advance to the State an
. 69321
- 5 -
0
amount equal to its portion of the project cost. The City's
total portion shall consist of the sum of the following:
a. The City's share (as specified in Paragraph
3) based on the actual bid prices and the
estimated State furnished materials costs.
b. Six (6) percent of its share [Item (a) above]
for the cost of Engineering and Inspection.
6. upon completion and final acceptance of the
project, the City's final share shall consist of the sum of the
following:
a. The City's share (as specified in Paragraph •
3) based on the final payment to the
Contractor and the actual State furnished
materials costs.
b. Six (6) percent of its final share [Item (a)
above] for the cost of Engineering and
Inspection.
The amount of the funds advanced by the City in
excess of the City's final share will be returned to the City
without interest and the City agrees to pay to the State that
69321 •
- 6 -
0
amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the
funds advanced by the City.
7. The City shall provide and /or perpetuate an
adequate electrical power supply to the service pads or poles,
and upon completion of said traffic control signals with street
lights installations shall provide and /or continue to provide
necessary electrical power for their operation at the cost and
expense of the City.
B. Upon completion of the work contemplated in
Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its
cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its
components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary;
• (2) relamp the traffic control signals and street lights; and (3)
clean and paint the traffic control signals, cabinets and
luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's
responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the
interconnect and to perform all other traffic control signal and
street light maintenance.
9. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work
to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of
the City and any all claims that may or might arise under the
Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said
employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any
• 69321
- 7 -
0
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part
of said employees while so engaged on any of the work
contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and
responsibility of the City. The State shall not be responsible
under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of the
City.
10. Timing of the traffic control signals provided for
herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner
of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except
with the approval of the State.
11. Upon execution by the City and the State and
completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this
agreement shall supersede and terminate any existing Agreements •
that may exist between the parties.
69321 •
- 8 -
n
�J
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
0
(City Seal)
By
City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA
•
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
District Engineer
Operations Division
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
M
Mayor
Assistant Commissioner
Dated
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Assistant Attorney
General -State of Minnesota
By
Dated
• 69321
- 9 -
0
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson enter into an
agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation
for the following purposes, to wit:
To remove the existing traffic control signals and install
new traffic control signals with street lights, interconnect
and signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) at
County State Aid Highway No. 7 (2nd Avenue Southwest) -
County State Aid Highway No. 25 (2nd Avenue Southeast), and
on Trunk Highway No. 15 (Main Street South) - Trunk Highway
No. 15 /Trunk Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at Trunk
Highway No. 22 (Washington Avenue) - Washington Avenue; and
install a new traffic control signal with street lights,
interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 15 /Trunk
Highway No. 22 (Main Street South) at 1st Avenue Northwest -
lst Avenue Northeast in accordance with terms and conditions
set forth and contained in Agreement No. 69321, a copy of •
which was before the Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and
hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume
for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations
contained therein.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of McLeod
City of Hutchinson
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and
correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council
of the City of Hutchinson at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on
the day of 1992, as shown by the minutes of
said meeting in my possession.
(Seal)
ty Administrator
•
C
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
RE: Discussion of GIS /GPS Development
As noted in the Annual Report for 1992, the City, County,
Hutchinson Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone have been discussing
development of a GIS (Geographic Information System) data base map
and system. I had planned on showing videos of the system
capabilities, but due to time limitations had just provided some
handouts. This system basically would eventually tie all City data
bases (planning, assessing, water billing, finance, design and
engineering, building permits, topography, parks, sewer and water
inventory, street system inventory, etc.) into one geographic
• orientated system. This system could tie into LOGIS, the County
data base files, the TIGER (Census Bureau) system, and other
compatible systems.
The Annual Report noted the following costs:
$ 2,500 Preliminary Needs Analysis
$ 5,000 Final Needs Analysis
S 6,000 Surveying /Field Work by County Surveyor
$14,000 Data Base Map Preparation
$27,500 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST
Clarence Kadrmas has received funding from the Hutchinson Utilities
Commission to complete the GIS Data Base Hap now so that his
personnel can utilize the system this year. We are in the process
of selecting a consultant to do the Preliminary and Final Needs
Analysis (see attached letter from Bolton and Menk) . Following that
process we plan on selecting a consultant to complete the Data Base
Map preparation. The City, County and Hutchinson Telephone, and
potentially other agencies, would then need to make a financial
arrangement with Hutchinson Utilities to pay for their share of the
costs at some point in the future.
Rick Kjonaas, who represents the McLeod County GIS Committee, will
also be at the meeting to discuss their interest in the system, as
• well as the plan to tie the system into the GPS (Global Positioning
System).
City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on mecgcled paper -
M E M O R A N D U M
April 22, 1992
BO L.TON 8,L M F:= N K ,
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
201 W. Travelers Trail • Burnsville, MN 55337
Phone (612) 890.0509 • FAX (612) 890 -8065
April 15, 1992
Mr. John Rodeberg
City Engineer
City of Hutchinson
37 Washington Ave. West
Hutchinson, NIN 55350
Re: GIS Needs Analysis - Proposal
Dear Mr. Rodeberg:
We are pleased to offer this proposal for professional consulting services to enable the City
of Hutchinson to commence implementation of its' Geographic Information System (GIS).
As discussed previously, the initial step in beginning a GIS will be a completion of a Needs
Analysis. This will be conducted in two stages, preliminary and final.
PRELIMINARY NEEDS ANALYSIS
The preliminary stage will begin to determine the extent of the land base data available to
you in the city departments of engineering, public works, utilities and assessor, including
formats of the data, i.e. machine readable, tabular forms, maps, etc.
An over -view will be obtained relating to installed computer hardware, the location of each
platform and the compatibility with the GIS (proposed). Interviews will be conducted with
department heads to determine the direction each would like to take in solving today's and
tomorrow's data needs. (At this preliminary stage of the Needs Analysis, the interview
process will be limited in scope and length but will be sufficient to chart the direction of
future policy.)
A preliminary report on the scope and integrity of existing data and on your future
requirements will be developed to establish a direction for the City of Hutchinson to follow
in developing a GIS program. Specific data requirements, development procedures and
hardware and software recommendations will be detailed in the final Needs Analysis to
follow.
Preliminary Needs Analysis Fee $2,500.00
•
•
•
I N(=.
MANKATO, MN FAIRMONT, MN SLEEPY EYE, MN BURNSVILLE, MN AMES, IA
An Equal Ccccn -- '. ITC CVC r
Mr. John Rodeberg
• City of Hutchinson
April 15, 1992
Page 2
TTNAL NEEDS ANALYSIS
Follow up interviews will be conducted with department personnel to determine specific
needs for information, both present and future. Data integrity and connectivity will be
determined as they relate to the utilization of the proposed GIS.
An inventory of present computer hardware and peripheral equipment will be undertaken
to determine its availability to and compatibility with the GIS.
A review of data available to the City of Hutchinson but proprietary to other local agencies,
(i.e. County surveyor, engineer, auditor, etc.) will be conducted. A determination will be
made as to utility and integrity of the data to the GIS and to Global Satellite Positioning
(GPS) needs.
A Final Needs Analysis report will be prepared detailing our findings relating to the
sufficiency of existing data and recommended departmental information goals. A GIS
• Development program will be outlined with recommendations as to additional hardware and
software, connectivity to existing data bases, base map construction and a management
structure within the City to add to and maintain the GIS. The report will deal with both
the short and long term aspects of the GIS including projected equipment and personnel
costs for the next three to five years.
Final Needs Analysis Fee (additional) $4,000.00
Upon completion of the Final Needs Analysis we will then be in a position to more
accurately determine the costs associated with base map production (the initial stage of
actual GIS data conversion production). Preliminarily however, we have estimated the cost
to provide this service to you at approximately $12,000+ and have earmarked an additional
$6,500 for GPS and conventional surveying in order to tie the control network together
geodetically to insure map accuracy. This control survey phase will be seen to have been
crucial when later attempts are made to do spatial analysis, overlays and edge matching.
SCHEDULE:
We anticipate the preliminary stage of the needs analysis will be completed within 30
working days of notice to proceed. The Final Needs Analysis report will follow within an
additional 60 working days. Base map development could begin concurrently with Final
• Needs Analysis on a limited basis and assuming it is coordinated closely with us.
Mr. John Rodeberg
City of Hutchinson
April 15, 1992
Page 3
Thank you for your consideration of Bolton & Menk and this proposal. Should you have
any questions or wish to proceed, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Since
Gary R. s, L.S.
VP /Metro GIS Division Manager
•
•
40
(612) 587.5151
ITY Of HUTCHINSON
✓ASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
:MNSON, MINN. 55350
M E M 0
DATE: September 20, 1991
TO: G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
FROM: James G. Marka, Building Official
RE: Trebelhorn /Brandt Encroachment and Drainage Issue
The attached documents represent the "encroachment and drainage issue" between
Mr. Phil Trebelhorn and Mr. Robert Brandt.
Mr. Trebelhorn's attorney, Mr. Pete Rasal has requested I forward this
information to you prior to issuance of a citation or consideration of such for
discussion of possible resolutions.
• Please note that the concrete drive along side Mr. Trebelhorn's existing garage
was placed without benefit of a building permit. (See attached permit No.
10346.) The approved driveway parking area addition represents a 6' -0" setback
on the Building Permit. Mr. Brandt's survey represents approximately a 3' -0"
setback with fill enccachment of 3 feet.
I believe the Brandts are in the process of selling their home and would
appreciate the City of Hutchinson expedite our legal position on this matter.
With the documents provided, it is my opinion that the drive is in violation
of Hutchinson's Zoning Ordinance 10.01 (copy attached) which requires a 5' -0"
side yard setback for parking spaces.
The thirty day limitation represented on Building Inspector, Mark Hensen's
letter to Mr. Trebelhorn dated August 13, 1991, has not been
complied with.
Please begin legal proceedings as necessary to resolve this matter.
JGM /mms
cc: Pete Rasal
Philip Trebelhorn
Robert Brandt— �3- rG4fu"64
• Mark Hensen
Planning Staff
9- s'
(612)587-5151
%CITY OF HUTCHINSON
37 WASHINGTON AVENUE WEST
HUTCHINSON. MINN. 55350
August 13, 1991
Mr. Phil Trebelhorn
725 Church Street
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Trebelhorn:
It was brought to our attention that your new concrete pad along your garage
does not comply with the required setbacks from property lines.
Any hardsurface area must be set back a minimum of 5' -0" and drainage must be
maintained on your own property. After receiving a land survey from your
neighbor Robert Brandt and a visual investigation by us, it is obvious that the
concrete slab is closer than 5' -0" and the grading and underground roof drain
the outlet is encroaching onto the neighbor's property.
The building permit was issued showing the slab 6' -0" from the line and not
extending past the front of the garage. It is every homeowners responsibility
to know where the property lines, easements, utilities and such, are located.
To correct the issues at hand, the concrete slab must be out back to 5' -0" from
the side property line and the grading and roof drain outlets must be changed
and relocated to not drain water onto neighboring property. These items must
be corrected within 30 days from date of this letter.
Enclosed is a copy of the survey from the Brandts and the drawing submitted on
the building permit application.
Please contact me if you have any questions and thank you for your
understanding.
Sincerely,
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Mark Hensen
Building Inspector
MH /mms
ce:"�James G. Marka, Building Inspector
Robert Brandt
G. Barry Anderson
Mike Glieden
9
A
A
9 - s.
LOT 5 PETERSON'S SUBDIVISION
C�
F
W
Cr.
� F —
A
I
N!w concrete
1
MOUSE
NO. 725
(garoge)
-7.4
mouth edge o(f
lacavalion c «�� v
32
•
•
•
1
V
T �
1
V
30
lb
115.00
LINDEN
N
t 0
. , VC `,
C
r� M
Q�
115.00
3 5
South end of 4 inch
pioslic droln file
10 9
STORAGE
SHED
•
•
•
L7
AVENUE
• denotes Iron monument found. 0 denotes Iron monument set. (I Inch by 14 Inch
0 10 20 40 Iron pipe, unless otherwise noted.)
SCALE IN FEET CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for ROBERT B R A N O T
1 hereby certify that this Survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I as a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the IMS of the State of Minnesota. EVA;Gt-i n.d P.c- Q.G. .
Oat• AUGUST 7, 1991 WIIlard Pal I[non, Minnesota Registration No. 9626.
� PELLINE N L AND SURV Minnesota. Book P 1 2 2 Page 5 Job No. 9 11 7 5L AND SUR V EYINO ,Nut c hlnson, Minnesota. Book P 1 2 2 Page 5 Job No. 9 11 7 5
9- -
SECTION 10: SPECIAL PROVISIONS
• 10.01 OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING FACILITIES
A. Minims Size Regulations. Each space shall contain a minimum area of
not less than three hundred (300) square feet including access drives, a
width of not less than eight and one -half (8 112) feet, and a depth
of not less than twenty (20) feet. Each space shall be adequately
served by access drives. All loading spaces shall be sufficient to
meet the requirements of each issue and shall provide adequate space
for storage and maneuvering of the vehicles it is designed to serve.
The minimum dimensions allowable for a loading space or truck berth
shall be twelve (12) feet in width and sixty -five (65) feet in depth.
B. Reduction and Use of Parking and Loading Space. Off- street parking
facilities existing at the effective date of this Ordinance shall not
subsequently be reduced to an amount less than that required under.
this Ordinance for a similar new building or use. Off- street parking
facilities provided to comply with the provisions of this Ordinance
shall not subsequently be reduced below the requirements of this
Ordinance, except as provided in section 6.05(C)(3)(c). Such re-
quired parking or loading space shall not be used for storage of
goods or for storage of vehicles that are inoperable or for sale or
rent.
C. Computing Requirements. In computing the number of such parking
• spaces required, the following rules shall govern:
1. Floor space shall mean the gross floor area of the specific use..
2. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall
be construed to be the nearest whole number.
3. Other Uses: For uses not specifically listed in this Ordinance,
uses for which a specific number of spaces have not been defined
or for joint parking facilities serving two or more different
uses, the Zoning Enforcement Officer shall determine the number
of spaces to be required by utilizing the requirements of the most
similar use listed in Sub - section N below. Issuance of building
permits for the above situations shall be subject to approval of
all site plans.
D. Yards. Off- Street parking and loading facilities shall be exempt
from the front yard and rear yard regulations for the use district in
which the parking is located, except that:
1. In any of the Residence Districts, no parking space shall be
located within fifteen (15) feet of any front property line, or
within five (5) feet of any side or rear property line, unless
enclosed as an accessory use.
2. In an Industrial District, no parking or loading space shall be
• located in any front yard; or in any side yard or rear yard that •
abuts any of the Classes of Residence Districts, and in no
82
q- s
l
MIR IN
0
a
f +l a C �1
Z .
I
II}( ><
Y
L
N I N
Street Ia•a: L
• • R11L ►IRO
PERMIT Be.
OFFICE USE OMIT
; � PAS[
TM
•A PP RS I 1 :
/. — 1 I
TYPE IF COIS7ROCTIDN:
RATE
. IX.
ARE
LOT CORNERS
11 EVIOIRCEI o
_ VOR If Not. .AV [Doll have property sere Q'N
OCCUPANCY CROUPS
by a
t eglatored
Lied %or or rise l0 I@Seance of permit.
17.
INSTALLATION
IF
NIRUFACTURED EONL: Sir jai N.Mpor: _ A�
•
REJECTIONS
Mali
/Model:
NA Year
1,4.
PLOT
PLAN: 1I
Oro. a. afro. pa is t l.g north i. the
-
PAYMENT IF FEES
D ISSUANCE
Z)
Fill In street sue11) ass locatla.l al.
AND EXCAVATION
PERMITS.
FIRE SPNINCLEAS REOUIRE$I TES sO
f)
Fill 1. the front. fall Are 71de nee setback dl.eas lest from
property line to house and 411 .....Lee, str Yct", .411 llsn.
al
Ora. 1s proposes o. 1 I 1.9 Ore aelblcl 4 bars lost from proposes
paldlog to all proper., list, are 1.I6ting Itr.el.res,
S)
Oro. la e,l,tisp c @rb c.t.
E)
Store at@, doe Image Chabot be All 1w14 eat@ aslghior, lard.
Streit Name:
.re w•ee el tww
l
MIR IN
0
a
f +l a C �1
Z .
I
II}( ><
Y
L
N I N
Street Ia•a: L
♦ilia. 11111111111111111111 .1111 H 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 .11111111111•
PLDMIIMG PERMIT 19. A%. EXCAVATION PERMIT 16. NJSL
PLEASE REAB .z Fit LOVING REFIRE 5101110 APPLICATION:
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 MAT[ READ AND EIAMINEI iNIS APPLICATION A.J KNOW 711E SAME If
If TRVE AMO CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAYS All 01e11ANCIS GOVERNING INIS TYPE OF
WORE DILL BE COMPLIED VETO. VVETMER SPECIFIED MEOEIN 01 NOT. TOE 6RA11194 Of 7111
PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME 10 GIVE Aurmsa17T TO VIOLATE 01 CANCEL ]ME PROVISIONS IF ANY
ITNER STATE ON LOCAL LAW AEGVLATING CINSTIUCTl O1 OR TW[ PERFORMANCE IF CONSTRUCTION.
•
1
2
I
1 fl'( 1
BWILDIAG DFFICI L AffIICANT
✓1
THIS SPACE FOR
OFFICE USE OMIT
'7 q
•A PP RS I 1 :
/. — 1 I
TYPE IF COIS7ROCTIDN:
RATE
OCCUPANCY CROUPS
REJECTED:
BATE
SIZE OF BIRO: S.F.
REASON FOR
REJECTIONS
FIRE ZONES
NALINUM OCCUPANCY LOADS
(-SUBJECT TO
PAYMENT IF FEES
D ISSUANCE
NUMBER DUELLING MOITSS
OF FLONNING
AND EXCAVATION
PERMITS.
FIRE SPNINCLEAS REOUIRE$I TES sO
♦ilia. 11111111111111111111 .1111 H 111111111111 1111111111111111111111111 .11111111111•
PLDMIIMG PERMIT 19. A%. EXCAVATION PERMIT 16. NJSL
PLEASE REAB .z Fit LOVING REFIRE 5101110 APPLICATION:
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 MAT[ READ AND EIAMINEI iNIS APPLICATION A.J KNOW 711E SAME If
If TRVE AMO CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAYS All 01e11ANCIS GOVERNING INIS TYPE OF
WORE DILL BE COMPLIED VETO. VVETMER SPECIFIED MEOEIN 01 NOT. TOE 6RA11194 Of 7111
PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME 10 GIVE Aurmsa17T TO VIOLATE 01 CANCEL ]ME PROVISIONS IF ANY
ITNER STATE ON LOCAL LAW AEGVLATING CINSTIUCTl O1 OR TW[ PERFORMANCE IF CONSTRUCTION.
•
1
2
I
1 fl'( 1
BWILDIAG DFFICI L AffIICANT
✓1
City 0f
7 IF
I a
H E H 0 R A N D U H
Cl
0
DATE
T0: Hutchinson Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, H.
Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF 1ST
ADDITION TO PETERSON TERRACE SUBMITTED BY REDMAN REAL
ESTATE
Staff recommend approval noting Lot 3 is a buildable lot, developer
should state intentions in writing for Lot 3.
April 8, 1992
Recommendation is subject to a subdivision agreement regarding
future assessments etc. Also, plat is to show a 12' easement on
Lots 1 & 2 to accommodate existing infrastructure.
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
q / x
f
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
. Printed on recycled paper -
FIRST ADDITION ' TC
N s. .
\t _
tibi(�
I -
\BO
t /
1
m
" /TERRA :E N
�'cT ERSG J 5
— Vii 'Ir a Y � e� P 095
CD
1 U N 0
l p
J/ 8B 4J
3ep .
,( •
/c 3• /
b
oC) 3 /
b
r ?4..
s ja a
a /
r„na9e oM uUltly easemenh ore arovi mus
_ 2 0 _ _
_
11 119 6 het in .,din, unless on,e1wne " ndicarea,
a adjoining mr lines. 10 het in *,din end
W ,imna sheer lines
r
1
I dUrotes ran rmtwrMnt lOand
O densities V2 inch by 19 Inch iron PiPe Ht,
marked by License No. 9626.
The southeasterly N" of PETERSON '$ TERRACE
Is assumed to hors a Waring of 530'00'00 "w
w / s •
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rodney W. Saar and Rebecca J. Saar, husband and wife, fee owners and First
sate Federal Savings and Loan Association, Hutchinson, Minnesota, a United States corporation, mortgagee, of the
following described property situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, to Vitt
Lot 8, Block 1, PETERSON'S TERRACE, according to the recorded plat thereof.
And that Dwayne L. Briese and Dianne S. Briese, husband and wife, fee owners, and First Stets Federal Savings and
Loan Association, Hutchinson, Mlnneaota, a United States corporation, mortgagee of the following described proper
situated in the County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, to Wit:
mot_ - , ncTrucnv1c Tva PAU1 . nrrnrdtna to the recorded Plat thereof.
C
DATE: April 8, 1992
•
I
TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, M.
Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GOLF VIEW
SUBDIVISION SUBMITTED BY KEVIN COMPTON
Staff recommends the following:
- Rear yard setbacks on 42 and 04 are directly opposite of
front setback
- Parkland dedication is paid
- Separate water and sewer services required to each unit.
- 5' 0" setback for each driveway required provide drawing
- Original P.U.D. has lapsed
- 105' is not maintained at building line on lots 2, 3, and
4
- A subdivision agreement is required
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
H E H 0 R A N D U H
i
N
m
�m
r
J
II
I
m �
e
e
--f
- I!
I
v'E. "•Tip
`y Ly
`S,0'55'00 "E 296.93
156 141
I 6
&:ti -1 8
I '
-
., I li 11 �I
0
I �
I —�1
i
� 11
1
o I
I _
Ul
`
p oi �-- -`---- - - - - - -
----
m 176
m
CD
o
LA
m ° . VI E W - COURT
No•5T.00" w IQ7..56
O O
O
0
x
DIo W
o I
o
p4 / �\
`I o
11 q :
N •
.a
I� 1
0
e
�
1
,............... i
e1
- I
16 6 11 e - 11
8
m 142
T
P SOO55'00'E 298.24 1
I
I
i
I
I
I
i I
V4 .: ` vJ L..YL.I }1 ; r �.. 4 r•r_. 1
Y:�' ) .+ � 1 1 i ' • , 'ti•.+ 5 ° •� �,� • I +
t•sf , ° ` -. f t 'Y 1 f � r �� ` ly v f' " - t, � ^' � � ; 1 .: ti t � '� w�' 1
�J a �. +r �. r � �►' _ z rr. � j ,� X
O 00 E, .. 296 93
j 6
F
x 25 t.. '-I 9
1
� / I
FCD
® r0 '
n
m ° V E VIi? C0 R pr
M- DRICT
rn
NO•55:00 "'M IQ73�, Fa Jim p
`
�_ >
mo , X'/Y
' w � •� f, ,I —_` �'� � �
m
4P'
o a �- z
m I4I`m
p 176 _
SO.55 298.24
/ m
SHGCY _ 14 .7
A { .
•
9 -X,
e
i, fir,
Area to be
Platted
r,.TF AvE NEE N W
-
'
_
g _
..
ABC LCN
_
..
[Ln
° c F �
' N 3c
njDC�
y
6
•E✓
a
e
I I�
�
I cEi cz - J - •
�_ Y[- y
• J
,
e
...
i=
••° �
• °� •
avENUE N W
_
••• S/
� S 1 EvENiN
6 el vmT IRD j
2
° ..a B, FvIJFiM Z..
4
_
-'
' v
..... e
2 I
a
'
' Cmi�ION AD
_5-
r
`1 . I Je
•
9 -X,
city of
E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE:
TO: Hutchinson Planning Commission
April 10, 1992
FROM: Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Marka, H.
Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SIOUX HILLS NO 2
SUBMITTED BY SKIP QUADE, 2 MILE RADIUS, ACOMA TWP
Staff recommendSAas plat is laid out due to the following:
This is an urban development in a rural area, the McLeod
County Comprehensive plan page 29 states: Let the cities
be urban and the townships be rural. Promote cost
efficient and attractive urban development in the cities
and agricultural(or agriculturally - related) or very low
density residential development in the townships.
• - It is understood all infrastructure costs would be
assessed to property owners including trunk water /sewer
lines and lift stations.
- Municipal service availability may be financially
unfeasible.
- The city has concerns of adequate fire protection to a
densely populated rural area without fire hydrants.
- If development occurs, city staff recommends larger lots
with ghost platting for the potential of urban size
lots.
- The city requires a subdivision agreement to cover all
improvement costs related to municipal utility costs if
development occurs.
Shows no dedicated parks areas.
Drainage concerns due to urban development in rural
setting.
• City Hall Parks & Recreation Police Department
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street 10 Franklin Street South
(6I2) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -2142
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on recycled paper -
f - 23021 Ulm Court
Hutchinson, Mn 55350
April 6, 1992
Edwin E. Homan
McLeod County Zoning Administrator
830 E 11th Street
Glencoe, MN 55336
Gary Plotz i
City Administrator
City Hall - i -
Hutchinson,'MN 55350
i
Re: Sioux Hills No 2 Preliminary Plat
Dear Sirs
This is to inform you that'Skip Quads made an appearance
before the Board of Supervisors of Acoma Township at our
monthly meeting on Thursday,'April 2, 1992, seeking approval
of Sioux Hills No. 2 Preliminary Plat in Section 35, Acoma
Township. After much discussion the Board approved the
platting of the first 1,000 feet from the high water mark
of Campbell lake with the remaining area not being approved
due to the fact it is zoned agricultural.
Please note 'that in a letter to you dated October 2, 1991,
it stated that the Board :of Supervisors came to the same
decision in regard to the sketch plan.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please
feel free to contact Virgil Goetz, Chairman of the Board
of Supervisors.
Yours truly
,\
1
•
t
s
C l
I� c
io
d
a
LYNN
1p O ]I
5
ACOMA
TOWNSHP 117 NORTH _ CODE-I RANGE 30 WEST
MEEKER Do'
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
K
K
Ka. K
_`
�
7.
C
• LT.. er.
Y.I�.
V w
�
•
�
• ( µ�
� �.~
a ll
L ulu
•.h r...
•
vr.YU�
.l
lti+ �
rs
i
ACOMA
TOWNSHP 117 NORTH _ CODE-I RANGE 30 WEST
MEEKER Do'
Lp l�
.. ms F d ii'
NARY
SIOUX HILLS NO. 2 PRELIh11 PLAT
M
4 ` i ••� l,� - : 7 OWNER HOWARD (SNIP) OVADf 19928 SIOa1111111 Road Nulchlnlan, Min"010 '�,� y °`� '-. Ir r•y��` f l ,
=K.4 1 __ r? '•; ., .r � i. ,��r i �t �_l�! % 1111
; �,p,) a l% '"� ,�. - 'w i -�•[ ' '�IC �.'1'�
14 1
MTY W. •.1. `�• lili n r, �/ r I % ��. ,� / ', '�, / ii .� I ' 9
61X1
n� ,..- ` t \ BOG . ' �y •' � J l r I, f� 1 � " / �% � / I : . � /`
• 1 � �\ � —•Z'c V \ r � � � � ll� Al I � i � l 1'
49 I ` i •-� J :'.
,r 1. - r 1 / - •]
:I; ,«. I i �., L,,) X1 1'', 3 1� ♦' -- lI � � =_` —! it I . I � _ � I I r ;_� o
.,0 9/ `4..25
��� ' 2. I'1 1 �� \; \ .'° ff ! 1\ / ('fit . J3�'/ it I J 1 �` I \ I �� � /,\ �-+L _�• -• \ r /.��� � - G _
' I A . � (< r �� f � �t � . i � ,9m i ✓ l \ 1 1 I � % /.' 2 - r � :''� � Y - � � \ , � ' `-'-\ + 1 .,, � 1 - ci'
8 �\ +' 1 a t li I iT\, .l -+, �, r� i1 \ \ R. `� ,.. t t t i
} fli'3 s} �L fr^ . nl f ���F` � \ \ / a. � _C I ' / /� 4 r ), ♦ \\(', 2
4
4 1 cl 1.. T 1 I ,n' ,, \11 n• V 1'%%/
.1. -.t 28
'
I
I
S : 7 A ' 1 ` ;. 1 \ } \� / ,°" II it Icsm•. l II' q , Y'.
X �� D
i • • % 1 1 \ �1 i`�i /' 8. 1 �\ `� 14t 1 L_ - r .l L d >~ !� .. •:
.� j II I llf ,. t Ya
II 12 \II, tii1 /' h
•z I I V '� \„ •! I %: J I I I :f• a f ^ FI�:L. II 47
I 141
I.L '- L... e7 _ 1 • 1 '' , , /all II J ; \ I % �
1
a_ —�lr -` y .,1d,r
In I _ q
IT
1 E s { � T , 1J RJ:- 11 Pt � )n�a�.. 1 , 1: �{ � i. 1 I 1 (I.� J • _ ' r _..X ' �• l ' �f'"'t. ♦ 1 d4��+� �
I� =- ar � w i J '� `� r..wn..r I `� 1 I �:r•t _r ,fA'y+4'1 a L, ;.
• �-� T T ..,.., .. .�..n. ., Y , e t c - ',.� ?A I: � ;v
:i
M E H O R A N D U H
DATE
April 10, 1992
T0, Hutchinson Planning Commission
FROMi Planning Staff- G. Plotz, J. Rodeberg, J. Harka, H.
Hensen, G. Field and B. Anderson
SUBJECTS CONSIDERATION OF SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTED BY DAN HUEBERT,
ACOHA TWP, 2 MILE RADIUS
Staff recommends approval subject to township approval.
11
City Hall - Parks G Recreation
37 Washington Avenue West 900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
9 -/&:Qr
I�
IF." !1
Tt•
SMALL TRACT OWNERS
i
K �I
Pv.
•L•I K
�I Av.
Yl1 i
Yfl �.I
<•1 S
![I M.
1 •
u 1
fu
•�.
.
u
u
f
y..r�l�
I
1
•u.Y�
•�
li •
•
•
•�r.4��
N
1
V. u�
IJ
li 1
1
i
Vo ws
L� X
1
y. ...
f �V.
`
v.,.
IJ
•
I
.T
I
pvw•..�
I
ti�
� _.
!J.
•
.� ?.. t+�
I�a(�_
X is
I
•i.w
.��
J
•
•
I
I
w� •�Y�.r
fr(•.. rw Y..
a
.s
1
•r •�
•COL
.l
IJ
•
1
�
u
u
•."��
u X
:
•�.....
a
•
.�..:�.`.�
is
9 -12a -,
ACOMA
TOWNSHIP 117 NORTH CODE- I RANGE 30 WEST
RR[k[R W.
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY fo* DR. DAN HUEBERT
NYJ corner of NE 1/4
; 'Cost iron monument
Cj
M „
O lO
MD
M
z v
z
3
0
North line or NE I/4 of Sec. 26, T 117 N., R. 30 W. , NE car. of NW 1/4 of NE 1/4
Wesi, assumed bearing 322.1 T —
-
31 24�
-
OWN2"IR.. ROAD--- -Je- -t
- -- 8 T' tk DI. _
- - -- -- - _ -� 3 NE cor ner of Section 26 Cost iron monument
ARCEL B ` On �- 88 ACRES ro? N W 0 z
PAR EL A
° 10.4 ACRES
d N
hss s
1 9 w 429 9B
N B 5.01.
• denotes iron monument found
0 denotes iron monument set
112 inch diam. iron pipe
M •
z
N
N
' T
�.
o
296.55
1 I `..\
0
0
N
East
N
I
N
N O
V O
C
O V
0
`-
al
a
LL r
N , N
1p et
✓7
O
�
u
z
N s ?•
3
\ ��
S
0 100 200
scale to feet
N81 '13 -
o
I
V
c
N
0
w
' T
PRELIMINARY SKETCH
OF
PROPOSED
PLAT
PART OF SE 114 OF NE 114 OF
SEC.
26, T. 117 HL, R.
30 W.
DAN HUEBERT, DEVELOPER
Y_
`^ 100
? in
j
i
. April 17,1992
To the Attention of: The Hutchinson City Planning Commission.
In Regards to: Permit issued to Cedar Crest Estate, 225 Shady Ridge Rd.,
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350.
On October 29, 1991, Henry and Rosalind Ewald were granted a permit for
remodeling and an addition to Cedar Crest Estate. Because of financing
difficulties we were unable to start the addition at that time. However,
we are very hopeful that the financing will be going through very soon and
we will be able to start the addition this spring.
At this time we would like to request an extension on the variance. The
plans for the addition and remodeling will be the same as what was approved
last fall.
Respectfully,
•
is
Henry and Rosalind Ewald
67498 205th St.
Darwin, Mn. 55350
q" I 4
AP919
RECEIVED
STATE OF MINNESOTA r a� 2` `EQ£6
COUNTY OF MCLEOD
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County
Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m.,
in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota.
THE Pf1RPOSE OF SAID M EETING is to con sider the applications fcr Platting
and Rezoning h eretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Skip
(Howard) Quade.
Said application for Platting relates to Sioux Hills No. 2. Said Rezoning
Application has been submitted for a Rezoning from an Agricultural District to
a Rural Residential District to allow single family non -farm dwellings.
• THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Platting and Rezoning is anticipated and
situated in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows
to wit:
The Wz of the NW; of Sec 35, Twp 117N, Range 30W. Except the S 720' thereof and
except the N 550' of the W 792' thereof. Also that part of Govt Lots 7 and 8 of
said Sec 35, described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of said Govt Lot
8; thence S 89 degrees 25 minutes 03 seconds E, assumed bearing, along the N line
of said Govt Lot 8 a distance of 1317.91' to the N} corner of said Sec 35; thence
S 0 degrees 37 minutes 26 seconds W 677.24'; thence S 28 degrees 35 minutes 36
seconds E 565.63'; thence S 89 degrees 37 minutes 58 seconds E 381.07' to the
W'ly line of SIOUX HILLS; thence SE'ly and S'ly, along said W'ly line, to the
• (continued on reverse)
most S'ly corner of said SIOUX HILLS; thence S'ly 73.77' along a tangential curve •
concave to the W, having a radius of 558.52' and a central angle of 7 degrees 34
minutes 05 seconds; thence S'ly, tangent to said curve, 254.18' to the N line of
the S 720' of said Govt Lot 7; thence W'ly, along said N line, to the W line of
said Govt Lot 7; thence N'ly, along said W line and along the W line of said Govt
Lot B, to the point of beginning.
THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which
time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in
opposition to or support of the proposed Plattin; and Rezoning. Thereafter, the
McLeod County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County
Board of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's
recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the
power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission. .
DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
Edwin E. Homan
McLeod County Zoning Administrator
•
•
1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County
11 � 130
i
APR 1992
m RECEPIW
m
rn Br�, � —
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF MCLEOD
Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m.,
in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota.
THE PURPOSE OF SAID MIEETING is to consider an application for a Ccndi*_
Use Permit heretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Timothy
Albrecht. Said application for a Conditional Use Permit relates to a confined
feedlot (dairy farm) exceeding one animal unit per acre.
THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Conditional Use is anticipated and situated
•
in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit:
That part of Lot 24 of the Auditor's Plat of Lot 15 of the Auditor's Plat of Sec
7, Twp 116N, Range 29W of the 5th P.M., described as follows: Commencing at the
SE corner of said Sec 7; thence N 89 degrees 18 minutes 13 seconds W, assumed
bearing, along the S line of the SE} of said Sec 7 a distance of 1032.94'; thence
N 0 degrees 41 minutes 26 seconds E 1699.71' to the S line of said Lot 24 (being
the S line of said Lot 15 of the Auditor's Plat of Sec 7) and the point of
beginning of the land to be described; thence continuing N 0 degrees 41 minutes
26 seconds E 297.57' to the intersection with a line parallel with and 400.00'
S'ly of, as measured at a right angle to, the N line of said Lot 24; thence E'ly,
along said parallel line and its E'ly prolongation, 358.15' to the center line
of Cty Hwy No. 25; thence SE'ly, along said center line, a distance of 329.76'
to said S line of Lot 24; thence W'ly along said S line, to the point of
• beginning. Subject to an easement for roadway purposes over the S'ly 66.00'
thereof. NE i�.a caar c« i n� e ct+r
(continued on reverse) A.I Aczc C -AW rN�Y+C- t zCA
AA s w 22 Mtrs
2L �-.T, Dn nJ1
THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which
time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in
opposition to or support of the proposed Conditional Use. Thereafter, the McLeod
County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board
of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's
recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the
power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission.
DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
Edwin E. Homan
McLeod County Zoning Administrator
•
HASSAN VALLEY
TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH 000E 6 RANGE 29 WEST
YYTDIrR3Dn - lags ZI Tra
M•M r A }
` 1 0 [ w• .�I.— • . 1 . i iiv:�.a Y 'u• I Q � .ua llpJ�iL° uI I u
n i
I _ I t_ If /// / _ '° • ' Cf� Rf IG{. / y 1 1 • it S] +l lf�l v U f� Y I 0 A
I \ \ ,� =.ry y � - _ - tUBaG 1 • • IRm l LI] 0., pY I[F• � l
•.Ar•L � .[Si
YA LDI
I ,! Sp .w . fe YRS •LCEN JCN CTTE !11•}Zlr[ `• .c YMr OA�OS
\ p "u;. MO[. 1 r STNa2Y 101EL WMC1H L - a •
1 • Rf^ , QiCCAR E5` VCIIETIE K RI••fA ^� }te
1 r AJAA O lv� I
�o• [w JO. iVALE] IN•Cx0 ••IZDD •[ Cn �C '�: � ei t
rm •� ® .. n
• []i 4 PnaL+ l aE6CCa
I sr
' a0 'vlvw a MEKCA
a "' NOII II(( E �� ELSQ . Yye 'AE • ,N ]EL L[RS
'In Qa GW � �' ilCr� •' •' I }VYCY .•<F IQS(fl •' F'E ��F O 1
• NA NE , ^°` •, "ERT
OA FILK I"
..Y �'/i/ /_ es 4 c \: ^\^ or
•x
< — JCU � �, . 7 xruLD ` E.e ` ' •q LIC[N �s. e. •nsr
emw ICD � naw
� JAYES MavIN a L �, •a A a InNUO .�
FJO CL rNE p am (G�IAHfN] Lfl ELD _4rYA PYMER OAS R4
e - pl I 1 I
[..., .RS GauLEA ra Ml] Illwll a �AI•Dr' j. I I
a wLRIN/ nu •••www THE 35 s
D(YVILD R t ULMET I re , .I rapl • (•'
'In a I
a O R13 OMSr �' / . a . R N llil _ �J a`'L fY1 ••lD IW Y
I ES . sa •—L RWHT urr •'1i D'Jr40 H aGER] a ME ILL
1 'T,
E A A
nEll : - r •'. S)1_ �J zx IM f 1 ! MYH•OY
• An I KYIrVI -OJ Lr ARLES e 1 . l z
��. LAn a •T�idEETER la ea A� 9a NItEN • aL a aA[' ME
LGRES
2'JGIW ILLS •a REIfCR ` M ]
<0.1NC I u uL
M FALf6
ALL I :. 1REEN Q' YME] I f / _ GRLEY p�
u ReAH J am . / IRIEWE
. 11 7 EPER . I 1 �, L W_
.r •NW ' - DYAAD s EDw•ac J J
Eu�EK 1 ' 1•�
r5T,,E,, E a J : ]w•EtElr- \ L LnaN •ELLLI O ••l C jpl 4
` •i£D �iIE a bl
- 11 I EVLEIE [ST =
erPa EDr}H o I YlY plgOpt - .I
A.
L 1 EPSQr
w�.A • lU • A- ' N� a
T NAM a _ LEOI'Y 11D T { � t + R � • L E FAAMS
aoc LeAUI I • �]L,E_aL I
rx.
. � � =_a I
.. 1 VEPNI]N [mss'• V REN ILL.LAN f a ■.MINI im a
/ e
:CCMIiZ DRE]SEL atr+L �n•• PETER]ep R•�N • r..0 =CBE�I �� {
n rt0 9 MLOA Q �r WANI
^N rl
'' • moo lq V H 5[NrARZC ,ISLE• U•.D D a •i ' K• a u..AI
• @I RED LLA rw[[.L "m [LEEK YCLA[ • 'Q [A kt ) a ®Q E-0W9•IA
6E`3 E L" n
I ]T a
• R
32 VI! e DITO Q ' l.n•U• OIWLES Y
PMN WN SCN'Naa xf •RD ME
- DAL[ �' 0 ' JD1a6O•
ARGrF aAH{O'w l "_ L NAII aE iEA] : a•
gam. LST APC] vC OR a [�n M•i. ' [EAEO cr> I RIVER CARL
. �� ETaL - `RRAiME . r <. CM TE99 w ^ m Cni
Sa H1IEN
:��� ?OL . �S �I . ?SZ� •O 4 J
SIMTER MLLE 101 TVa
SMALL TACT OWN[ES
� o...
.� ..... .r —
T7
T- 129q
�j
LL 2170
ATT
1rt
tc
IT
44K
T
I ql�
'i ?4
0
APR 1992
m RECEIVED
• STATE OF MINNESOTA BY_
LO
COUNTY OF MCLEOD Sae2 18pE6j
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a regular meeting of the McLeod County
Planning Commission will be held on the 29th day of April, 1992, at 8:30 a.m.,
in the County Commissioners' Room at the Courthouse, Glencoe, Minnesota.
THE PURPOSE OF SAID MEETING is to consider an application for a Conditional
Use P ermit heretofore filed with the County Zoning Administrator by Oliver
Johnson.
Said application for a Conditional Use Permit relatesto the placement of a mobile
home as an accessory to another dwelling for the care of another family member.
THE PREMISES UPON WHICH said Conditional Use is anticipated and situated
in the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota is described as follows to wit:
• Beginning at a point on the W'ly 75' right -of -way line of MN State Trunk Hwy No.
15, 939.2' S of the N line of the NEI of Sec 13; thence W'ly on a line parallel
with the N line of said NE$, 325'; thence S'ly on a line parallel with the said
W'ly 75' right -of -way line, 603.1'; thence E'ly on a line parallel with the N
line of said NE} 325' to the said W'ly 75' right -of -way line; thence N'ly along
said right -of -way line 603.1' to the point of beginning; said tract containing
4.70 acres more or less, all in Twp 116N, Range 30W, subject to that certain
mortgage to the Hutchinson Federal Savings and Loan Association which parties of
the second part assume and agree to pay according to its terms excepting
therefrom the N 200 feet thereof.
(continued on reverse)
L
9 __R_*L1_ I
THIS HEARING will be held by the McLeod County Planning Commission at which
time you may appear if you desire, either in person or by agent or attorney, in
opposition to or support of the proposed Conditional Use. Thereafter, the McLeod
County Planning Commission shall forward its recommendations to the County Board
of Commissioners. If you desire to appeal the Planning Commission's
recommendations, you can take your request to the County Board which has the
power to overrule the decision of the Planning Commission.
DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
Edwin E. Homan
McLeod County Zoning Administrator
F 11 L
T
LYNN
COOE•s HASSAN VAL1
r.A[i I, Tti.
R AW E 30 WESTowNSHp 06 NORTH COOE-6
MUTCHNSON
M,HI w M r (.•DC a
r t r au / Orrp L
DART, a
w0 . • OS ] JPw50. C.a[F wvti.w \ \ I - • Y_ r �'. YRS 4E£N " MIE
wNNET TE
'\, \ \\ \\ �\ I \ D a • J ) GYEGOII L[ISEL WTIENi
_ c I a aME
r • L (p ''C
1 �<
L E,
IIKN4,J 4t •Qa M' uEllY11 WCFD.NS
,1 Iq I aYSwC)7 .MU O r .cw�L o. . Y ' O� e
g ss5 _ �_ — Eo r `. -<'•. e
MS•1 I( °1°'� I aw � m + 'a r 7l
-r � nm icti]o... luYaw TT Mr�v
i• ''� 5 1
x00 a IM 1 nSr+'rNCNOfrr 'r r.. v IiBEM ELLA x IR(.�
' 1 x� ]o ll+•xllA" /� /n =.n, . '/— I• rILC
or C
WIIiCNi
ENT
X'� ' t MRrO� �" DONALD
r '3 x a BRINK ED 4E£RTSS. rLF lC�gyl
MEL \IN a
C ARS �\
. IRE [ \
! '. .. -f' -"', 1 q • Orr
I rr!-rC,C a 15CV r • t r v0.A r e Rr
�.�'• � , � I LDJ< GmJf CA Ta t
zm
II , WM.H
Ac 7 t0_rq n . ti. r CARTER r a••IETZ
''OS•fY rl .[r° -. LirsJ•a L
f A DORIS - - �\'i 1 adrr[_W� `�• 6
( RCY T • .D .0 .
[ :.LSJ- f 1 S rJ T�11GE5
DL A, -•� b
= C'_1_! fwM fy� y rrw�Rl. C n J SI/. I] n MMGrrT [ (.
NI. Y W ]r_�R.in /. .VI•t At..rWl.\ Z •.0 L �1
J f 1- r] . C5 (.r6 114 Y y�4 —OM a RR NE
m MO �. x � IC 5 I 1U911CCE MEII
CARL nl_ )t •J I ••_1 KRNp. L
..J r+a• f1] [...a ° LN. a .ER I)S Ne
A E T _ e;Jb«N ELVa�
CD f� `• REllfif
x` le•x �i r,w , W'•rfi'� " +' a �: ie. I EVER" a� aM ;.
rr- /..E)• • ^wYC J a
ELLR n L " EuctxE • `r IN
�� jrQr N "
J , USM��•rN - i+�r/" II aA)n C'J 'E:Kfrf � STE VEx e
IKlu,/.� r1 - � r ,i ab r . Mr INf.c 5]R. ] •� own L r D MRAN
_ C.. _ I C EUGEH CNO _
Il]O Dam 0150 0Mb ' ��,�`(FhE • _
.r )• ' ECRi.r. ELY I ( WRIC Ems
2 Mo I o l c � �� A
, tlIiCNS �.� LJ4 ` r .•l. 9: !i[ LC 1P J torpor [ 7 �J r
1.0 .•fPt •( ISO
R ANSLN ' _ fO 1 T ,." '
,`✓�• ( t NARYET C IF[ Imulm
ws:ER.aw I ,• "O , l ` [ ��D LD
DE. • ao. raRM�
f� xRDy Leaol I b0(t:sL m
I \ n.EY.N ` vERNON �A
D L.L£ a' a /RYrN ME95F1 • I T611REN
OI v.s.• • S'. 1 O n I .. Ql N1PM C
C9L Jl-- -- [
SI D
I rVx( i f n YEYrTZ
T m[i4 _ C"API-= L
�o I +.: .L.
SGT • 1Kli I mrY. JOG ^ e li mu[4 TN 3�� `[LCD ONO.•
rl! vE3 EL' n E ElEM
c..r.r 3 m.
L . •. Al a
CI:o: Tat NaORCN.L a0• / �.. - RGN DOM •' - S RZJ DAL
ORD/ [
jL�.�. •L '[ :�DE?x I"'D h. • n'. ��L. IE 1161N9• • NAb .EiEltl
`� r JLCSJI LTD. Iw (• R.n IIOI- T r[- '
IO.Lr[• !•D \E MTS ID • lH( rrC.[ C� .ROT � R. VAL LOIR.wE
x • [42.t
r r.'rrV + . MMEI R nra.tl0
INIlE II mm :a
SIMTER I.Afd MI
SMALL 72ACT OWNERS SMALL TRACT OWNERS
ti
Nor- llffmqlm.Lp�
A c L G o 13 Co , Nor; TG sc �►! c
l
7 q�v�
a} y
Al
I 3Y a r j
� �L2_ 7
t
J �
I
•
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
a a a��e
APRIL 28, 1992
_ = c�= a�- asaaae = c =�moca
WATER & S EWER FUND
*Withhold Tax Acct
employer contribution
797.71
Aagard West
April Services
5,968.00
Bro Tex
Towels
74.10
Central Garage
March Repairs
1,691.72
Citizens Bank & Trust
Savings Bond
50.00
Devries, Randy
Dinner Expense
13.82
Doug Johnsn
Safety Shoes
46.87
DPC
Containers & Chemicals
345.00
Feed Rite
Acid
834.92
Hach
Lab Supplies
66.90
Hutchinson Hospital
Inv. 889154 -1
35.00
Hutchinson Utilities
March Services
267.85
Ingman lab
Lab Test
126.00
League of MN Cities
Retro Adjustment
2,283.00
MN Valley Testing
Testiing
159.50
NCL
Lab Supplies
94.90
PERA
Employer Contribution
467.82
SVEN
95414 Repairs
110.00
Vessco
Parts
294.09
Water Products
Meters
432.00
Total
14,159.20
•
C ENTRAL GARAGE FUND
*Withholding Tax Account
Employer Contribution
102.39
Ag Systems
Valve
17.50
Carquest
Filters
70.02
Case Equipment
Repair Kits
339.98
C.E. Meyers Truck Service
Freight
636.00
Hutch Wholesale
Supplies
36.76
PERA
Employer Contribution
59.96
Schramm Implement
Motor
79,19
Twin City Garage Door
Transmitters
78.00
Total
1,419.80
•
// -A'
1 .
GENERAL FUND 1 •
*Dept. of Nat. Res.
Title Reg. Fees
58.00
*Dept. of Nat. Res.
Registration Fees
421.00
*Madden's Resort
Registration -K. Johnson
275.00
*MN Dept of Revenue
Sales Tax - Civic Arena
608.26
*Withholding Tax Account
Employer Contribution
5,454.33
AM Hotel Register Co.
Waxed Bags
75.60
American Risk
April Services
800.00
Arnold & McDowell
April Compensation
3,230.00
Athletic Technologies
Maintenance
99.00
Beadell, J. & Ewert, J.
Housing Rehab. Loan
2,283.00
Bennett Office
Binders
74.00
Berger, M. & Schlect Const.Housing Rehab. Loan
2,123.27
Bernhagen, John
April Compensation
2,019.00
Bethke, Sherry & TEK
Housing Rehab. Loan
1,565.00
Bethke, S. & Bonn. Elect.
Housing Rehab. Loan
772.00
Brown's Floral
Plant- Holman
20.00
Camera Shop
Prints
18.20
Central Garage
March Repairs
10,058.54
Christenson, Dorothy
Sr. Expo Refund
8.00
Copy Equipment
Ammonia
28.85
County Treasurer
Driver's License Fees
191.50
Crow River Glass
Glass
20.00
Curtis Ind.
Blades
57.24
Dept. of Nat. Res.
DNR Reg. Fees
341.00
Field, Wanda
Class Refund
8.00
•
Floor Care Supply
Mats
355.00
Forbes Auto
Repairs & Supplies
413.05
Gregor, John
Electrical Supplies
21.62
G.F. Nemitz
Stain
18.95
Haasl, James
Velcro
4.32
Home Bakery
Inv. 4356
24.00
Hutch Cellular
2 Cellular Phones
800.00
Hutch Fire & Safety
Extinguisher Rechg.
26.30
Hutch Iron & Metal
Inv. 22010
8.28
Hutch Iron & Metal
Iron
3.00
Hutch Plbg & Htg
Repairs
83.10
Hutchinson Utilities
March Services
9,135.77
Hutch. Conv. & Vistor B.
March Lodging Tax
1,734.32
Hutch. Police Dept.
Film
15.66
Kirby Co.
Parts
15.70
Krsiean, Eileen
Sr. Expo Refund
8.00
K -Mart
Supplies
14.75
Law Enforement Equip.
Name Bar
16.70
League of MN Cities
Retro Adj. - Work Comp.
110,155.00
Marco
Maintenance Contract
1,071.00
Mark I
Calendar Refill
26.91
McGarvey Coffee
Coffee
27.45
Merrill, Kenneth B.
LOGIS Training
63.64
Miracle Rec Equipment
Hangers
123.31
MN Blueprint
Inv. 1138493
39.42
•
MN Chapter IAAI
Dues
10.00
MN Playground
Modular Playsystem
3,464.55
MN UC Fund
1st Qtr Unemployment
1,768.56
Mogard, Steven
Glasses
70.95
Motor vehicle
Mueller, Lloyd
National Fire Protection
Northern States Supply
•
Paulsen, Adair
PC Express
PC Express
Pearce, Lorraine
PERA
PERA -DCP _
Peterson, Folmer
Pioneerland Library
Prints Charming
Quill Corporation
Schewe, Brett
Schnobrich, Mark
Schramm Imp.
Service Master
Shopko
Stepp Mfg.
Templeton, Inc.
Turf Supply
Twin City Garage Door
UBC
Urban Communications
Victorian Inn
West Publishing
Xerox
Zee Medical
Sales Tax & License
509.00
Ordway Refund
72.00
Renewal
75.00
Screws
5.34
Show Announcer
150.00
Modules
90.00
Inv. #128218
64.00
Ordway Refund
36.00
Employer Contribution
4,850.28
Employer Contribution
28.71
Class Refund
16.00
2nd Qtr Payment
15,763.25
T- Shirts
1,980.90
Opti -Fluid
38.72
Refund - Shelter
13.00
Lunch Expense
10.00
Shipping
(2.65)
Cleaning
80.25
Photos & Frames
49.74
Repairs
987.00
Employer Contribution -April
194.68
Inv. #36371
738.88
Transmitters
40.00
Supplies
97.15
Equipment Rent
145.00
Rent & Mtg.- Luncheon
488.92
Books
182.75
March Useage
416.96
Supplies
241.90
Total
187,490.88
•
BOND FUNDS
RURAL FIRE DEPT
Engle Fabrication
YOUTH CENTER
*Withhold Tax Acct
Coast to Coast
Farm & Home
Henry's Foods
Hutch Leader
MN State Treasurer
PERA
Scott Wakefield
Tombstone Pizza
Viking Coca Cola
tools
employer contribution
supplies
supplies
supplies
advertising
food license
Employer Contribution
June rent =
pizzas
supplies
TOTAL
1980 TAX INC DEBT SERV
E.Quast & Rutz Plbg
HCDC loan
s
65.26
65.91
24.67
16.17
275.78
29.04
50.25
38.60
750.00
78.45
22.75
$1,351.62
12,000.00
•
Triple H & O
CD payment
2,037.60
•
•
Block /8
21 Hassan Street
45 Hassan
126 lot AV* N E
Lot 1 2 4 S - Migen
Lot 3 - Jandusek
Lot 47
Farmer elevator
Fare Service
Elks
Laundromat
Christopher Trucking
Simonson's
Railroad
Dakota Rail /State of Mn
Total Acquistion
eal Estate Taxes
lition
Asbestos Removal
Consultant
Cost of Financing
Bond Discount
Capitalized Interest
Ads. A contingency
Total
Funding source
Resale/ trade bldg.
Bond Sale
Total
-/)aU,A, ti
�umMA 4
ti.
�
y 1 r� ` \
37,500
65,000
253,853 233,853
40,000 40,000 Estimate
283,853 438,853
85,000
85,000
90,000
90,000
215,000
215,000
40,000
40,000
1,000
1,000
5,2501
5,250
96,321
98,321 Condemnation
4,878
4,878
537,449
537,449
531,302 iJ
976,302
20, DOD ��
20,000
110,000-
20,000 - 7
110,000
20,000
43.000
45.000
19,000
19,000
9,000
9,000
75,000
75,000
40,698
40,698
1,170,000 1,315,000
595,000 595,000
575,000 {85,000
150,000
__ ___ ___ _ _ ____ --------------
1,170,000 1,230,000 Wib �_) / Urli
(es,000) �FX /iva/Z
e
L
•
C.
April 21, 1992
Mr. Dan Huebert
P.C.S.
1110 Hwy. 7 East
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Dan:
I believe City Council approval and /or direction is required regarding the
consumption of liquor near the proposed vollyball courts which will likely
increase the required parking, due to the increased serving area.
Building Permit No. 10677 to install a patio sliding door in the Flyers
Nightclub is being placed on hold until the Flyers liquor license and parking
issue is resolved.
•
•
Best regards,
` ^CI\TYY OF HUTCHINSOSON� Q,
��Q/plgp � I ' K"vc(..
James G. Marka
Building Official
JGM /ms
cc: Tom Dolder
an Prochnow
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Steve Madson, Chief of Police
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
City Hall
37 Washington Avenue West
(612) 587 -5151
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street
(612) 587 -2975
Police Department
10 Franklin Street South
(612) 587 -2242
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
- Printed on w"cled ralxr -
HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL
MINUTES
• The monthly Hutchinson Safety Council meeting was held at
noon, March 29, 1992 at the McLeod County Heritage Center.
There were 13 members attending.
The program was presented by Jim Faber who showed the video,
Driveline (PTO) Safety and You. The video was produced last
year at a cost of $70,000.
President George Field opened the meeting. The February
minutes were approved as submitted.
Old Business
Leslie Smith did not look into reserving a booth on April 13
& 14 at the Home Show to be held at the Civic Arena because
we would need somone to "man" the booth.
New Business
AA bill was submitted by Joyce Rix in the amount
of $29.00 and was approved for payment.
Because of the excellent quality and safety message and low
cost of $7.00, a motion was made by Les Smith and seconded
by Joyce Rix that the video viewed today on Driveline Safety
be purchased and loaned to the City Maintenance Dept, 4 -H
• Clubs, the Vo -Tech School and other interested groups. The
motion carried unanimously; Jim Faber will order the video.
President George Field presented the $25.00 annual renewal
notice payable to the Minnesota Safety Council. Les Smith
moved that the membership dues be paid; Marlin Torgenson
seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Safety concerns noted:
Look into the feasibility of having a crosswalk located on
South Grade Road between the Civic arena and the mall.
The pigoen droppings have become a problem and health
concern to residents located near downtown.
Streets near the rec fields on Linden Ave are the only
parking areas for these fields and become congested with
children and parents and are a safety concern. It was noted
that parents must be responsible for their children in these
areas.
The next meeting will be held on Monday April 27, 1992 at
noon at the Heritage Center. John Rodeberg, City Engineer
will present the program.
• Checking Balance: $408.36 Savings Balance: $194.47
Y
Board of Directors Meeting -- Crow River Arts, Inc. April 2, 1992 -
t"h
7:00 pi I
The meetin was called to order by Chra. Bob Wilde. He introduced our ex Executive
Direcf n.+ Schuh Others present were: Bette Hubin, Brian Brosz, Joy Berg,
Joyce Young and SMAHC DirectorRob Ross. Missing were teachers /brd. members Kimberly
Liedel, Shanda Landes and Mavis Schwanke who.had conferences.
Minutes of the last meeting were accepted as corrected.
The financial report was approved and subject to audit at the end of the fiscal year -
Bette /Joy. Bills were submitted for approval totaling $1113.64 - Joyce /Brian.
Balance in checking is 649.27 and in saving $6243.42 as of 3/31/92.
Correspondence: Information only - Red Wing Arts, Grand Marias Art Colony and Nat'l
Arts Placement. Bette Hubin will complete survey for M. Ass'n of Community Theaters.
Mn. Citizens for Art (MCA) material will be sent to the attention of Butch hereafter.
COMMITTEES:
Program Registration of classes for Summer - Sign up with Park and Rec Activities.
Joyce will contact teachers on Summer flyer to be at the registration table. Bette
Hubin will be available to help if needed.
Summer Theater - MSF Bette /Brian - We will hold Summer Theater in July with
State Arts H.S. students if it has a proper Director and funding becomes available.
We can apply for Guarantee against loss funding one month before the program starts.
This will assist in planning.
Any.future programming (after July) for September and beyond can be applied
for through SMAHC.
Chamber of Commerce - Bette /Brian - to have Butch meet with Nel Gilman to
seek a joint Chamber /Arts liaison person, namely Nel. D"ette&Butch will check
• files to participate in Water Carnival Activities as best we can. MSP - Bette /Brian.
Featured Artist - Joyce will write up an article. Butch and Joy will get
out publicity in SMAHC, Newspaper - Shanda and Turid can get info in ARTBEAT.
Networking Exhibits - Bette will contact Steve Menze for April and work with him to
set up future exhibits.
Workshop - Gwen Leopaldt should be contacted if at least 5 are committed to
attend. Charges are to include an amount to Crow River Arts (CRA) with total $120.00
brought in. MSP - Joyce /Bette
Volunteer - Ardeane Summerfi6ld has scheduled a Training session on Thurs, May 7 in morn.
Publicity Butch will talk to Shanda about Artbeat, etc.
Nominating - Ann Reid and Ellie Becker will serve on committee. Joyce will try to
find one more.
Membership - MSP Brian/Joy to insert the word "minimum" at each classification level.
A goal of 250 new individual and business members was set. $4,000.00 Will be the target
level to be reached. The strategy will be introduced at the next meeting.
BUSINESS:
Annual meeting and election - Tentative date - Thursday, June 4, 1992 Butch will review
old By -Laws for rotation and length of term for board members. MSP Brian/Joy
To be completed by meeting - Past year report by secretary and treasurer) new programs
for action, budget.
0 Information notes - Linda Baysinger Peck - to be taken home to look over.
Director report - Butch
Director report - Butch
1. Key control - will check on who has keys and how it could be handled by volunteers.
2. MSP Brian /Joyce to give Butch authorization to purchase supplies within guidelines
of the budget. •
3.Butch has board approval to purchase and place bulletin -type boards for display, etc.
4.MSP Joyce /Joy - Butch may have printed business cards with his title - Consultant Directo
5. Communications with Park and Rec, Chamber of Commerce, etc. have begun. Butch will
speak to groups in other communities, to Hutch Optimists and in time to establish membershi
growth.
6. Joyce will contact Letty Bernhagen regarding the Hutch Women's Club Art Center project.
It is believed that of the 2500.00 pledged 900.00 was spent for the piano and 1400.00
remains to come in towards a computor. This information is necessary for planning.
7. MSP Joyce /Brian to authorize Butch to participate in JTPA, CETA, & /or other training
or summer youth programs that may be available for state funded monies for youth training.
8. MSP Joyce/Brian to ratify the Board's action of the working agreement on March 16,1992
Butch will bring a base one, percentages and so forth to the next board meeting.
Other business - Board rotation - and election was discussed further. Tentatively Bob
Wilde, Joyce Young, Stemple Johnson and Kimberly Liedel are eligible to go off the
board. Length of term and status of board members was also discussed.
Next meeting Thursday, May 7, 1992 at 7100 p.m.
Brian moved to adjourn.
Submitted by Joyce Young, Secretary
�u� �lL�Lli7�
o �
•
' TENTATIVE BUDGET REF 0
ITEM
BUDGETED
ADD'L REV. TOTAL FUNDS AV.
MONTHLY M.
EXP TO DATE
BALANCE
OVER�nq
7$00.00
- 7500.00
625.00
6250.00
1250.00
Insurance
250.00
- 250.00
-
250.00
-
Utilities
900.00
- 900.00
61.27
625.77
274.23
Bldg. Rep. k Faint.
100.00
- 100.00
-
26.80
73.20
Postage
300.00
- 300.00
-
214.70
85.30
Equipment
1100.00
- 1100.00
-
1100.00
-
Off. Supplies k Exp
600.00
- 600.00
37.39
325.87
271.13
Fed. /State Fees
100.00
- 100.00
-
60.00
40.00
Ass'n Fees
150.00
- 150.00
-
75.00
75.00
Advertising
750.00
- 750.00
-
723.06
26.94
Prof. Training
150.00
- 150.00
-
30.00
120.00
Contract Labor
7200.00
- 7200.00
-
2804.63
4 395.37
TOTAL
19100.00
- 19100.00
770.66
12485.83
6614.17
PROGRAM /ACTIVITIES
Art -
439.98
439.98
- 278.37
161.61
Children's Theat. -
2741.00
2741.00
- 3201.92
(460.92
Classes -
965.90
965.90
47.00 1409.86
(443.963
Concert /Symphony -
3545.00
3545.00
- 3996.
(451.40)
Nalkathon -
244.00
244.00
- 158.78
85.22
TOTAL -
7935.
7935.88
47.00 9
(1109.45)
ioinn nn
22a5.88
27035.88
817.66 21531 16
5504.72
DUES
GRANTS
380.00
15000.00
Fund Raisers
60.00
Rent
10.00
Refunds
65.00
Interest
41.68
Scholarship Fund
3
TOTAL
15881.68
Checking Acc't Bat. as of
Checking Acct Bal. 649.27
Saving Acct Bal. 6243.42
YEAR TO DATE 23817.
