cp08-13-1996 cSUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAqF
-11-
-12-
-13-
1:00 P.M. - HATS Joint Powers
5:00 P.M. - CLOSED MEETING
HUTCHINSON
Board Meeting at HATS
of City Council Re.
CITY
Facility
Litigation in City
CALENDAR
Center Main Conf. Room
5:30 P.M. - City Council
Week of
Meeting in Council
Chambers
August 11 to August 17
1 9 9 6
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
-14-
-15-
-16-
-17-
CONFERENCE /VACATION
10:00 A.M. - Directors Meeting
Ken Merrill - August 12 S 13C
at City Center Staff
Conference Room
Dick Nagy - August 12 -16 V
Gary Plotz - August 12 -23 V
Pat Vander Veen - August 12 -1
V
Steve Madson - August 16 -26 V
• AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 1996
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
INVOCATION - Rev. James Hall, Word of Life Church
PRESENTATION OF RECOGNITION PLAQUES:
♦ DOUGLAS HEDIN
♦ DAN PROCHNOW
♦ TAMMY WENDLANDT
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 23, 1996 AND BID OPENfNG IMINUTES
OF JULY 31, 1996
Action - Approve as presented - Approve as amended
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS ARID COMMISSIONS
• 1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT -JULY 1996
2. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY
BOARD MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1996
AIRPORT CO_vIMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 29, 1996
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
ORDINANCE NO. 96 -170 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION
12.01, SUBD. 5, CONVEYANCE OF LAND BY ADDING THERETO
AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 2.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN
PENALTY PROVISIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 10715 - RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
RESOLUTION NO. 10716 - RESOLUTION RELATING TO $1,050,000
GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1996;
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING
THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND
LEVYING AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF
4. RESOLUTION NO. 10717 - RESOLUTION TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT
WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICE IN CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 13, 1996
5. RESOLUTION NO. 10718 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT "SAFE AND SOBER" PROJECT
6. RESOLUTION NO. 10720 - AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF PLEDGED
SECURITIES FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO., HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA
7. RESOLUTION NO. 10721 - RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT
ON BEHALF OF HANDS, INC. UNDER MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON ( SEPTEMBER 10, 1996 AT 6:00 P.M.)
8. RESOLUTION NO. 10722 - APPROVING PUBLIC AUCTION OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
REINSTATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON TAX FORFEITED LAND
(c)
BINGO LICENSE FOR ST. ANASTASIA CHURCH'S FALL FESTIVAL
(d)
NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR ST. ANASTASIA
CHURCH'S FALL FESTIVAL
(e)
NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MCLEOD COUNTY
AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION
(�
EXECUTE RESIDENTIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 186
AND 196 THIRD AVENUE NW
(g)
APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSIENT MERCHANT LICENSE BY CRAIG SCOTT
FISHER AND DARREN LEE HONES WITH RECOMMENDATION TO DENY
LICENSE
(h) APPOINTMENT OF DAVID WESTLUND TO PLANNING COMMISSION
Action - Motion to approve consent agenda
PUBLIC HE RIN - 6.00 P.M.
(a) SUBMISSION OF ADAMS STREET SMALL CITIES REHAB GRANT
APPLICATION
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) CONTINUED HEARING FROM JUNE 25, 1996 FOR TRANSFER OF
OWNERSHIP OF CITY CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE TO TRIAX
MIDWEST ASSOCIATES, L.P., OR DD CABLE PARTNERS, L.P., DD CABLE
HOLDINGS, INC. AND ITS VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES D,B /A MIDWEST
CABLEVISION
Action - Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt
Resolution •
•
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 13, 1996
6. COMMUNICATIONS. REQUESTS AND PETITIONS -- NONE
(a) PRESENTATION AND RECOMMENDATION BY HCDC TRANSPORTATION
TEAM REGARDING PRE - ENGINEERING FOR PHASE II OF AIRPORT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) PRESENTATION BY CHARLEEN ZIMMER OF SRF CONSULTING ON THE
LIGHT TRAFFIC PLAN FOR HUTCHINSON PROJECT
Action -
7. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES -- SEE CONSENT AGENDA
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FOR PURCHASE OF TWO
GROUNDS AND SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE MACHINES
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and award bid
9. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF CLOSING ARCH STREET BETWEEN HIGH STREET
AND RESIDENTIAL AREA TO SOUTHEAST DURING BLUFF /ADAMS
STREET CONSTRUCTION
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION OF LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 97 -01. 02,03 AND 04
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve project and adopt Resolution(s)
(c) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING HUSKI ADDITION SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(d) CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED 1997 HUTCHINSON AREA
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING STUDY
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 10719
(e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM SOLITRA U.S.A. TO EXERCISE
OPTION TO PURCHASE LOT 9, BLOCK 1, FIRST ADDITION IN INDUSTRIAL
PARK ACCORDING TO AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading of
Ordinance and set second reading for August 27, 1996
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 13, 1996
(� CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
TO REVIEW 1995 FINANCIAL AUDIT REPORT ON AUGUST 27, 1996 AT
4:00 P.M.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve special workshop
(g) CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
WITH EARL FITZLOFF TO DISCUSS INTERSECTION AT LYNN ROAD,
SOUTH GRADE ROAD AND HWY. 15 SOUTH
Action -
10. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
11. CLAIMS- PPROP iATIQNS AND CONTP ACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds
12. _ADJOURNMENT •
A
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1996
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Mayor Torgerson. Present: Mayor Marlin
Torgerson, Council Members Bill Craig and Don Erickson. Absent: Council Members John
Mlinar and Kay Peterson. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of
Engineering John Rodeberg, and City Attorney G. Barry Anderson.
In the absence of a pastor, there was no invocation.
MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting of July 9, 1996 were approved as presented.
CONSENT AGENDA
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
FINANCIAL/INVESTMENT REPORT - MAY & JUNE 1996
2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 18, 1996
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
• 1. RESOLUTION NO. 10706 - RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE
SALE OF $1,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT
BONDS, SERIES 1996
(c) SHORT -TERM ON SALE NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR
R. C. PROMOTIONS
(d) ONE -DAY OFF -SITE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR HUTCHINSON HOCKEY
ASSOCIATION ON AUGUST 17, 1996 AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS
(e) DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ACCOUNTS
(f) ANNUAL 8K RUN AND TWO MILE WALK ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1996,
SPONSORED BY HUTCHINSON ATHLETIC REHAB CENTER
(g) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY BETHANY BAPTIST CHURCH
TO CONSTRUCT CHURCH BUILDING IN R -2 DISTRICT WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 10707)
(h) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY ANNE HIRSCH TO MOVE
MOBILE HOME ONTO LOT 102 IN COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE WITH
FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION WITH
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 10708)
(i) AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464, SECTION 12.0 1, SUBD. 5,
• TO ADD LANGUAGE REGARDING REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT SPLITS
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 0
NO. 96 -170 AND SET SECOND READING FOR AUGUST 13, 1996)
0) PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF NORTH PARK RIDGE TOWNHOMES
LOCATED IN HELLAND'S EIGHTH ADDITION SUBMITTED BY DENNIS
KAHL, COMPTON ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 10709)
(k) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY DENNIS KAHL, COMPTON
ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION, TO CONSTRUCT FOUR PLEX TOWNHOME
LOCATED IN R -3 DISTRICT ON ARIZONA AND CAROLINA STREETS
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 107 10)
(1) VARIANCE REQUESTED BY DENNIS KAHL, COMPTON ANDERSON
CONSTRUCTION, TO REDUCE SfDEYARD AND FRONT YARD SETBACKS
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TOWNHOMES IN HELLAND'S EIGHTH
ADDITION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 10711)
(m) CHANGE OF STREET NAME FROM SUPERIOR AVENUE SE TO EASTGATE
DRIVE SE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING .
COMMISSION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION
NO. 10712)
The motion to approve the consent agenda with the exception of item 4 -(1) was made
by Council Member Erickson, seconded by Council Member Craig and unanimously
carried.
Item 4 -0) -- Council Member Craig explained that the deviance for the variance was
justified since it was a unique situation, and there had been an ordinance change. He
then moved to approve item No. (1) and adoption of Resolution No. 10711. Motion
seconded by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried.
(a) PRESENTATION AND RECOMMENDATION BY HCDC TRANSPORTATION
TEAM REGARDING PRE - ENGINEERING FOR PHASE II OF AIRPORT
It was requested to postpone the presentation until the August 13, 1996 meeting
when all the Council Members would be present.
9. NEW BUSINESS •
0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996
(a) CONSIDERATION OF COPS FAST GRANT APPLICATION
Police Chief Steve Madson explained that the grant would provide funding for one
police officer for a period of three years with a maximum of $75,000 toward salary
and fringe benefit costs. He reported there is a growing need for additional police
services, and the addition of another officer through the Cops Fast Grant would be
beneficial.
Following discussion, Council Member Erickson moved to approve the grant
application, seconded by Council Member Craig and unanimously carried.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF ROADWAY EASEMENT FOR IMPRESSIONS
INCORPORATED
It was reported that Impressions Incorporated may need an easement to cross the
lot adjacent to their property which belongs to the City. After discussion, it was
recommended to defer the item to the next City Council meeting.
Council Member Erickson moved to table, seconded by Council Member Craig and
unanimously carried.
(c) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM HCDC BOARD OF
DIRECTORS FOR BLOCK 50 PARKING LOT CONCEPT
• Mary Beth Schaufler presented the recommendation of the Downtown Planning Task
Force regarding the parking lot on Block 50 and the concept to use up to $5,000.00
of tax increment money on the development of green space and up to $5,000.00 from
the commercial loan fund for consultation. She requested authorization from the
City Council to proceed with both the green space concept and the consultation and
to use the funds for those purposes.
Following discussion, Council Member Craig moved to approve authorization,
seconded by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried.
• 04
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Administrator Plotz commented on a meeting held with Leonard and Dory Johnson,
owners of the Two Way Communications building directly east of the Dairy Queen.
The purpose of the meeting was to negotiate a price for the property so that the Dairy
Queen owners might be able to purchase the lot and expand its business. Mr. Plotz
noted that prior to negotiations, an appraisal was needed to determine the value of the
Two Way Communications property. It was recommended that Robinson Appraisals
conduct an appraisal at a cost of $500 to $600 at City expense.
Following discussion, Council Member Erickson moved to approve the appraisal at
the City's expense. Motion seconded by Council Member Craig and unanimously
carried.
•
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996 0
Administrator Plotz stated the City had been notified by the MPCA that the
Source Separated Commercial Organics Composting Facility Preliminary Grant
Application had passed the second stage. Another grant application will be
submitted in the near future.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CROW RIVER ARTS, INC.
Director Sue Gerver requested that the lease for the existing Crow River Arts
premises be renewed with the same terms as the current lease which expires
December 31, 1996.
Following discussion, Council Member Erickson moved to extend the Crow River
Arts, Inc. lease on an annual basis beginning January 1, 1997, with a six month
written notice required prior to lease expiration if it was not to be extended.
Motion seconded by Council Member Craig and unanimously carried.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY
Attorney Anderson reported that an exterminator visited the property at 536 Harmony
Lane. His report indicated that there might be other rodent sources besides that of
the property in question. The City Attorney commended the City Council for taking
prompt action to resolve a health issue.
City Attomey Anderson stated he had recently talked to Landwehr Construction, and •
he might see a need for a closed meeting prior to the next City Council meeting.
(d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
City Engineer Rodeberg noted that Resolution No. 10713 is required by MN /DOT
in conjunction with S.P. 133 - 104 -04, Bluff Street Bridge Project. The Resolution
will confirm that the City agrees to finance any cost in excess of the grant
($129,117.43) and return any monies not needed for the bridge construction.
Further, the City agrees to transfer the grant funds directly to the agency account.
Following discussion, Council Member Craig moved to approve and adopt Resolution
No. 10713, seconded by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried.
Engineer Rodeberg reported that since the State will be handling all of the funds. the
City will pay the cost up front and be reimbursed. He requested authorization of a
$22,758.15 expenditure to MN/DOT to cover the total project cost.
Following discussion, Council Member Erickson moved to approve the expenditure
to MN /DOT for $22,758.15, seconded by Council Member Craig and unanimously
tamed.
(e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR MARLIN TORGERSON
Mayor Torgerson commented on the need for striping and safety improvements
on Hwy. 7/22 West. He requested that a Resolution be sent to MN/DOT regarding
this matter. •
4
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 23, 1996
Following discussion, Council Member Craig moved to send Resolution No. 10714
to MN /DOT, seconded by Council Member Erickson and unanimously carried.
The Mayor mentioned that Hutchinson won the top award for bike safety as part of
the recent Bike Bonanza.
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
The motion to approve the claims and to authorize payment from appropriate funds
was made by Council Member Craig, seconded by Council Member Erickson and
unanimously carried.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:03 p.m.
•
CJ
• MINUTES
BID OPENING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 1996
The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m. by City Administrator Gary D. Plotz. Also present
were Supervisor Doug Meier and Planning Secretary Bonnie Baumetz.
The reading of Publication No. 4931, Invitation for Bids, Purchase of Two Combination Grounds
And Sidewalk Maintenance Machines, was dispensed with.
Following the reading of a letter from L & P Supply Co., the following bids were opened and read:
OPTION NO, I OPTION NO. 2 OPTION NO, 3
MTI Distributing Co. $37,946.20 $25,946.20 NO BID
Plymouth, MN 25,946.20 Net
LEASE #1
• $13,000.00
+ Tax
LEASE # 2
$13,000.00
+ Tax
Carlson Tractor & Equip. Co. $39,495.00 NO BID NO BID
Rosemount, MN 28,495.00 Net
The bids were referred to staff for review and recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 2:10 p.m.
E
h
e� i
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
• BUILDING / PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT
11 I HA,S'SAN STREET S.E. HUTCHIN.SON. MN 55350 PHONE 612234.4216 PAX b12.234 -4240
PPryff fnr the Imnth nf..ltrlts
•
•
NEW RESIDENTIAL
HOUSEKEEPING
BUILDINGS
barn
No,
a
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICL OWNED
NtaMar of
Valuation of
construction
Cher cent
Nurrt•ra
Valuatimof
oohs vanr
Omr cents,
Buildings
Housing
Units
c
Buldvrps
Houseig
Units
Smgl•- family Hoses. detached
e:ra.os m 4r
101
3
355,378
Sdgla- family rouses, attached
5•paarad a19'aand m r¢V wY.
Jvo use aGmn a. wb,r, asd
IM1 /YN lrM
102
Two4wnty buili
103
Three- and timm-larrmly buildings
104
Fivaarmare family bind-
105
TOTAL: Sun 04101 -1011
109
EIMEWNEW RESIDENTIAL
NONHOUSEKEEPING
BUILDINGS
Ism
No.
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
Nunberol
veVumiwof
mnatmcticn
Orn cards
N
of
VWumon of
mrutnrmon
Qnf ucto
Buidirgs
Pathos
c
Buildings
Roorrro
Hold& mass, and lowst whim
o-ansMnt secanmadaame
217
Other ionaoveekaapng sMher
214
NEW
NONRESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS
kern
No.
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
Nurrber
of
Buc6rgs
Valuation of
corratn cn
tlrid cents
c
Nanber of
Bindings
vak mice of
consinKtion
Qmaxxs
a
Ar,ussmer6, social, and renaallonal
716
Churches, and other re igkan
719
YMUstrul
320
Parlorg pampas (Wadings & open al d)
721
Service stations and rape` garages
772
Hospitals and ireVeNonr
723
Offices, bared, and profsssi w
324
Public works and W Boas
325
Schools and other educational
316
Stores and cus "aenAcaa
327
Other norvesNartal bindings
326
1
Stn t n other than buildings
320
ADDITIONS,
ALTERATIONS,
AND CONVERSIONS
R"
No,
w
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
Number
of
Buildings
rot
Vakmw d
ccnsoucUm
Cmif cants
(n
Number of
Buildings
(d)
valuation of
construcaw
Ornf cents
(a)
Resldarrtid . Clan* seldbors, of
gergr and Q.P'M1 in tam 436
434
13
136,729
Nonresidential and noNOuaukesping
477
13
246,275
Pddaons of reaAar" garages and reports
(attached and detached)
436
1
7-201711
DEMOLITIONS
AND RAZING
OF BUILDINGS
Iem
No
a
PRIVAT
LY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
Number
d
Buildings
Number of
Housing units
c
Number of
Buildings
Number of
Flousirg xvts
e
Sauaas (adacwd anal detached)
646
dings
646
r- Iamily buldiga
647
Frveor a twny bu4dings
bile
All other Wadrg9 and sa11GT n
60
RRR -17, RRS -1, RNR -2, SIGN -4, FENCE -3, MiI -3,
Total permits - 61 Valuation $746,212
Z/ -A (1)
MINUTES
Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
June 6, 1996
Members present were Mike Schall, Rev. Brian Brosz, Bruce Rosenow, Lee Cox, John Mlinar, Peggy
Westlund and Linda Martin. Also present were Dolf Moon and Karen McKay.
The meeting was called to order at 5:20 p.m.
The Minutes dated May 2, 1996 were approved by a motion made by Bruce Rosenow, seconded by Lee
Cox. The board unanimously agreed.
OLD BUSINESS
Middle School Pool - The pool was the largest issue to get passed. A committee will look at other
community pools. The bids will be let February, 1997. The pool will be used by the community besides
the school and other organizations. Lee Cox remarked this was a good opportunity for the School
Board to show the community that the pool is for the community. Dolf told the Board that the water
temperature is a concern of the community.
• Registration/Survey - The Board reviewed the results of the registration survey. The 42% of people
attending the mass registration were out the door 30 minutes after registration began. Some comments
are things that can be improved at no cost.
Mighty Ducks Grant - Hutchinson received a grant in the amount of $50,000 which will be used to
purchase new lighting and an Alumazorb ceiling curtain. A used dehumidifier has been donated from
H.T.I. and donated labor will be used for installation. The joists will be painted white.
Parkland Dedication - The city is seeking a recommendation from the Board regarding parkland
dedications with regard to churches. After brief discussion, John Mlinar recommended that churches be
exempt from parkland dedication, Peggy Westlund seconded the motion. The Board unanimously
agreed 7 -0.
NEW BUSINESS
CE Move/Staff- The history of the Community Education program will be going into longterm
storage. The move of the office will take place June 10th. The current programmer, Jo Black will retire
August 23rd. At this time there are three candidates for the position. The position will be advertised if
an internal candidate is not selected.
PRCE Bud¢et - Both the City and Community Education budgets are due by the end of June.
Community Education has a fund balance of $120,000.
�/_/_ '4, (_)
MINUTES •
Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
June 6, 1996
Page three
NEW BUSINESS CONT.
Middle School Activities - Community Education will handle the sports if the levy doesn't pass. Sports
associations are in place such as basketball and baseball, there is no football association at this time.
Activities for this age group is important.
Assembly of God Request - The Board received a request from Assembly of God Church for use of
Library Square Wednesday evenings in July from 7 -8 pm. It has been well attended in the past, this is
the fourth year for this event. Linda Martin made a motion to accept the request as written for use of
Library Square Wednesday evenings in July, Bruce Rosenow seconded the motion. The Board
unanimously agreed 7 -0.
Word of Life Cburgh Request - Word of Life Church has requested use of Library Square Sunday, June
16th 7 a.m. to 12 Noon. Linda Martin made a motion to accept the request of Word of Life Church for
Sunday, June 16th in Library Square. Peggy Westlund seconded the motion, the Board agreed
unanimously 7 -0.
July Meetin our - A tour of the parks with new construction has been scheduled for the next meeting, •
Wednesday, July 3rd. The tour will leave the Recreation Center at 5:15 p.m. for any Board members
who can attend.
V.F W Donation - The V.F.W. will be donating $8,000 to upgrade the play equipment in V.F.W. Park.
North Jaycee Park - There may be an addition of new play equipment in the former North Jaycee Park.
Staff will ask the Junior Baseball League for a contribution.
Band el - The City Council will adopt a resolution to close Library Square at 9:00 p.m. unless
otherwise reserved. The Chamber is trying to get the Band Shell refurbished. The parks in general
received over $6,000 of damage to vandalism in May. The Police Department locks the shelters after
10 P.M.
CAS Partnership - A developer from Sartell, Minnesota will be constructing Northview Acres, 137 unit
apartment complex. After brief discussion, Linda Martin made a motion that $4,500 be escrowed as a
parkland donation for each unit as it gets developed. Bruce Rosenow seconded the motion, the Board
agreed unanimously 7 -0.
1L 1
The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. by a motion made by Rev. Brian Brosz, seconded by John
Mlinar. The Board agreed unanimously.
• HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
MEETING
JULY 29, 1996
Meeting called to order at T40 p.m.
Members present: David Skaar, Joe Dooley, Mayor Torgerson, AI Koenig
Members absent Dennis Kahl
City Staff: Doug Meier
Guest: Tom Parker
Request was made by Joe Dooley that Robert Hantge to be notified of next meeting.
Next scheduled meeting will be August 26, 1996 at T30 p.m. in the Airport lobby.
Meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
. Report submitted by Doug Meier
•
,� -,�3>
• ORDINANCE NO. 96 -170 , 2ND SERIES
PUBLICATION NO.
E
•
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AMENDING CITY
CODE SECTION 12.01, SUED. 5, CONVEYANCE OF LAND BY ADDING THERETO
AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99
WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1: City Code Section 12.01, Subd. 5 is hereby amended
as follows:
Subd. 5. No conveyance of a parcel of land in which the
Parcel of land conveyed is described by metes and bounds, or
by reference of a plat made after adoption of these platting
regulations without recommendation by the Planning Commission,
approval by Council resolution, shall be made or recorded if
the parcel described in the conveyance is less than five (5)
acres in area and 300 feet in width unless such parcel is a
separate parcel of record on the effective date of this
Chapter or unless an agreement to convey such small parcel was
entered into prior to such time and the instrument showing
agreement to convey is recorded in the office of the County
Recorder within one year hereafter. A registered land survey
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions
and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including
Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as
though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption
and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this _ day of July, 1996.
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Published in the Hutchinson Leader:
First reading: July 23, 1996
Second reading:
.�z -6, �2)
RESOLUTION N0. 10715
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE
The Hutchinson City Council authorizes the purchase of the following:
ITEM
COST I PURPOSE I DEPT.I BUDGET
36 Lighting Fixtures & $
9,321
Replacement
Civic
Controls
Arena
Ceiling Curtain
5,350
Installation over Ice Shee
"
7396 Corrossion Inhibitor
9,798
Water Treatment
Water
Yes
Curb 6 Gutter
8,000
Replacement
Street
Yes
Manhole - 2
7,000
Installation on Grove St.
WWTP
Yes
Trees
9,330
Replace 6 New Planting
Park
**
* Mighty Duck Grant -- S to /Cit Financing
** Funding from Releaf Gr t and tilities Funding
The following items were authorized due to an emergency need:
ITEM
COST
Date Approved: August 13, 1996
• Motion made by:
Seconded by:
PURPOSE
VENDOR
usco Sports Lighti
assai Limited
alco Chemical
2nson 6 Vasek
iul Contracting
-ieve Landscaping
DEPT. I BUDGET I VENDOR
Resolution submitted for Council action
by :
Finance Director
��
11
AUG 13 '96 01:20PM EHLERS 3 ASSOCIATES
puss kifm�Ci721
$1,050,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996
RATING: Moody's "Baal"
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
26L E7 August 13, 1996
AWARD: JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY
P. 22
$$I: 5.67%
NET TRUE
NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY
Minneapolis, Minnesota
•
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
SMITH BARNEY, INC.
Chicago, Illinois
CRONIN & COMPANY, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
�J
4.00%
4.20%
4.35%
4.45%
4.50%
4.55%
4.70%
4.75%
4.80%
4.90%
4.00%
4.15%
4.30%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
4.10%
4.20%
4.30%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60°/6
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2008
2006
2007
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
51,038,604.45
$1,040,650.00
$1,038,660.00
5322,058.68
$323,005.42
$325,117.50
4.8610%
4.8665%
4.9047%
2950 G�W -� ■Ilw f _ Ws N IN 554 Gnur
[rl 9D Soum Soven t� Snet
MinntapOGE, MN 56102 -1100
*LEADERS IM ►DYIIC FINANCE • (6121338291 FAX(612)MM
0
City of Hutchinson, MN
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996
Date
Principal
HCifl
09/01/96
Discount:
11,395.55
08/01/97
� Final
02101/98
80,000
4.00
08/01/98
02/01199
90,000
4.20
08/01/99
Less:
02/01/2000
95,000
4.35
08/0112000
02/01/2001
95,000
4.45
08/01 /2001
Special
New
02/01/2002
100,000
4.50
08/01/2002
Annual
Interest
02101 /2003
105,000
4.55
08/0112D03
DAW
YAM
02/0112004
110,000
4.70
08/01/2004
02/0112005
120,000
4.75
08/01/2005
147,798.13
02/01 /2006
125,000
4.80
08/01 /2006
1,622,261
1997
02101 /2007
130,000
4.90
Notes
$1 050 000
Dated:
09/01/96
Interest Start:
08/01/97
Discount:
11,395.55
Interest
43,869.38
23,928.75
22,328.75
22,328.75
20,438.75
20,438.75
18,372.50
18,372.50
16,258.75
16,258.75
14,008.75
14,008.75
11,620.00
11,620.00
9,035.00
9,035.00
6,185.00
6,185.00
3,185.00
3,185.00
310,663.13 1,360 663.13 1 360 663.1
11,395.55 Discount
$322,058.68 Net Interest Cost
$367,312.50 Projected Net Interest Cost
$45,253.82 Savings
Bond Years:
Average Life:
Average Coupon:
Net Interest Cost:
True Interest Cost:
6,647.50
6.330952381
FhW Projected
4.67338%
4.84481% 5.52557%
4.86109% 5.54855
Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 08/13/96
•
� Final
$1,050,000
Less:
Less:
Total
Total
Capitalized
105%
Special
New
Existing
Total
Fiscal
P & I
Annual
Interest
Annual
Assess,
Dahl
Dept
DAW
YAM
43,869.38
75,000.00
103,928.75
147,798.13
76,438
37,102
39,336
1,582,925
1,622,261
1997
22,328.75
112,328.75
134,657.50
141,390
35,889
105,502
1,524,557
1,630,059
1998
20,438.75
115,438.75
135,877.50
142,671
34,675
107,996
1,453,733
1,561,730
1999
18,372.50
113,372.50
131,745.00
138,332
33,462
104,871
1,385,620
1,490,490
2000
16,258.75
116,258.75
132,517.50
139,143
32,248
106,895
1,230,880
1,337,775
2001
14,008.75
119,008.75
133,017.50
139,668
31,035
108,634
1,062,744
1,171,377
2002
11,620.00
121,620.00
133,240.00
139,902
29,821
110,081
894,675
1,004,756
2003
9,035.00
129,035.00
138,070.00
144,974
28,608
116,366
785,133
901,498
2004
6,185.00
131,185.00
137,370.00
144,239
27,395
116,844
535,217
652,061
2005
3,185.00
133,185.00
136,370.00
143,189
26,181
117,007
537,237
654,244
2006
310,663.13 1,360 663.13 1 360 663.1
11,395.55 Discount
$322,058.68 Net Interest Cost
$367,312.50 Projected Net Interest Cost
$45,253.82 Savings
Bond Years:
Average Life:
Average Coupon:
Net Interest Cost:
True Interest Cost:
6,647.50
6.330952381
FhW Projected
4.67338%
4.84481% 5.52557%
4.86109% 5.54855
Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 08/13/96
BID TABULATION •
$1,050,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
SALE: August 13, 1996
AWARD: JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY
RATING: Moody's "Baal" BBI: 5.67%
NET TRUE
NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY 4.00%
Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.20%
4.35%
4.45%
4.50%
4.55%
4.70%
4.75%
4.80%
4.90%
1998 $1,038,604.45 $322,058.68 4.8610%
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2008 •
2006
2007
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
4.00%
1998 $1,040,550.00 $323,005.42 4.8665%
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.15%
1999
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
4.30%
2000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.40%
2001
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.50%
2002
4.60%
2003
2002
4.70%
2004
4.60%
4.80%
2005
4.90%
2006
5.00%
2007
SMITH BARNEY, INC.
4.10%
1998
$1,038,660.00 $325,117.50 4.9047%
Chicago, Illinois
4.20%
1999
CRONIN & COMPANY, INC.
4.30%
2000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.40%
2001
4.50%
2002
4.60%
2003
4.70%
2004
4.80%
2005
4.90%
2006
5.00%
2007
YrNn and &jg@g p W& 90 2950 N ev e Center
South Seventh Street
L E A D E R S IN P U B L I C FINANCE (612) Minneapolis, 339&291 FAX (612))339 -0854
BID TABULATION 0
$1,050,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
SALE: August 13, 1996
AWARD: JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY
RATING: Moody's "Baal" BBI: 5.67%
NAME OF BIDDER RATE
YEAR
NET
PRICE INTEREST
COST
TRUE
INTEREST
RATE
JOHN G. KINNARD & COMPANY 4.00%
1998
$1,038,604.45 $322,058.68
4.8610%
Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.20%
1999
4.40%
2001
4.35%
2000
2002
4.45%
2001
4.70%
4.50%
2002
4.80%
2005
4.55%
2003
2006
4.70%
2004
4.75%
2008
4.80% 2006
4.90% 2007
FBS INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
4.00%
1998 $1,040,550.00 $323,005.42 4.8665%
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.15%
1999
NORWEST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
4.30%
2000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.40%
2001
4.50%
2002
4.60%
2003
4.70%
2004
4.80%
2005
4.90%
2006
5.00%
2007
SMITH BARNEY, INC.
4.10%
1998 $1,038,660.00 $325,117.50 4.9047%
Chicago, Illinois
4.20%
1999
CRONIN & COMPANY, INC.
4.30%
2000
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.40%
2001
4.50%
2002
4.60%
2003
4.70%
2004
4.80%
2005
4.90%
2006
5.00%
2007
Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 29 N ev e Center
90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis, MN 554024100
OLEADERS I N P U B L I C FINANCE (612) 339 -8291 FAX (612) 339 -0854
a�
-11,050,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Page 2
NET TRUE
NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST
COST RATE
FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA, N.A.
St. Paul, Minnesota
DAIN BOSWORTH, INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
0
PIPER JAFFRAY INC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
4.00%
4.20%
4.40%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
5.10%
4.00%
4.20%
4.35%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
5.10%
4.15%
4.30%
4.50%
4.60%
4.70%
4.80%
4.90%
5.00%
5.10%
5.20%
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
$1,038,481.50
$1,036,350.00
$1,039,500.00
$331,498.90
$333,468.54
$337,185.00
5.0005%
5.0368%
5.0829%
•
Cj
Moody& Investors Service
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
August 9, 1996
Mr. Kenneth Merrill
Finance Director
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street South
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2522
Dear Mr. Merrill:
99 Church Street
New Yak, NY 10007
We wish to inform you that our Rating Committee has assigned the rating of
Baal to the $1,050,000 Hutchinson, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds to be sold on
August 13, 1996.
In order that we may maintain the rating, we will require current updating
information. We will appreciate your continued cooperation in the future.
We would appreciate receiving a copy of the final Official Statement when
available.
Under separate cover you will be receiving a copy of our credit report on the
above referenced bond sale.
Should you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to
contact, Yaffa Rattner at (212) 553 -4429.
Sincerely,
Vice President/Assistant Director
Public Finance
YR:jr
cc: Ms. Sandy Ludford
Ehlers and Associates, Inc.
2950 Norwest Center, 90 South 7th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -4100
• CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
$1,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 1996A
Issuer: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on August 13, 1996,
at 5:30 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers at the Hutchinson City Center.
Councilmembers present:
Councilmembers absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 25
RESOLUTION NO. i o 7 t F
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $1,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1996; AUTHORIZING THE
is ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND
DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND LEVYING AD
VALOREM TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer
of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this
certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been
carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody,
from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and
complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said
corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions
taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far
as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was'duly held by the
governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members
indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by
law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of
1996.
• Gary D. Plotz
(SEAL) City Administrator
The City Administrator reported that proposals had been
received by the City prior to 10:00 A.M., Central Daylight Time today for the
purchase of the Bonds in accordance with the Terms of Proposal for the $1,050,000
General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996 of the City as previously
approved by a resolution of the City Council. The bids have been read and
tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows:
Total Interest
Bid for Interest Cost -Net Average
Name of Bidder Princi2al Rates Rate
0
•
0
• Councilmember introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption, the reading of which was dispensed
with by unanimous consent:
RESOLUTION NO. 10716
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $1,050,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1996; AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND
DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND LEVYING AD
VALOREM TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. Authorization. This Council has heretofore ordered various local
• improvement projects designated as Project Nos.
(the Improvements), to be constructed within the
City under and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The present estimated
total cost of the Improvements is as follows:
Project Costs . ............................... $2,235,311
Discount .... ............................... 13,650
Cost of Issuance ............................. 17,000
Capitalized Interest .......................... 75,000
TOTAL ...... ............................... ;, O9 1
This Council has previously determined to issue and sell $1,050,000 principal
amount of General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996, of the City (the
Bonds) to defray a portion of the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by
the City in making the Improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds
authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65, and $13,650 representing interest
as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.56. The remaining costs of the
Improvements will be paid from Federal and MSA Funds and from interest
earnings on proceeds of the Bonds.
• 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers and Associates, Inc.,
an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of
the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, •
Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and
Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds
were received at or before the time specified for receipt of bids. The bids have been
opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and
net interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined.
The most favorable proposal received is that of
of (the Purchaser), to purchase the
Bonds at a price of $ the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set
forth in Section 3.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City
Administrator are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of
the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the
unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith.
1.03. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things required by the
Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and
to be performed prior to the issuance of the Bonds have been done, do exist, have
happened, and have been performed, wherefore it is now necessary for this Council
to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide for the security thereof, and
to issue the Bonds forthwith.
1.04. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the •
maturities of the Bonds, as set forth in Section 3.01 hereof, are warranted by the
anticipated collection of the assessments and ad valorem taxes to be levied for the
cost of the Improvements.
1.05. Consolidation of Improvements. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 435.56, the Improvements are hereby consolidated and joined as
one project.
Section 2. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially
the following form:
•
-2-
• UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF McLEOD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BOND, SERIES 1996
Date of
Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP
September 1, 1996
REGISTERED
OWNER:
PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT: DOLLARS
• THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, McLeod County, Minnesota (the "City"),
acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay to
the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the
maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date of original hereof
specified above at the annual rate specified above computed on the basis of a 360 -day
year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each
year, commencing August 1, 1997, to the person in whose name this Bond is
registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of
the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred to herein
with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The
interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the City
Finance Director, in Hutchinson, Minnesota, as Registrar, Transfer Agent and
Paying Agent (the 'Bond Registrar "), or its successor designated under the
Resolution described herein, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of
the United States of America by check or draft of the City or the Bond Registrar if a
successor to the City Finance Director as Bond Registrar has been designated under
the Resolution described herein.
This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of
$1,050,000 (the 'Bonds "), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest
• rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution
-3-
adopted by the City Council on August 13, 1996 (the "Resolution ") to pay the cost of
construction of local improvements in the City (the "Improvements"), and is issued
pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws
of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes,
Chapters 429 and 475. This Bond is payable primarily from the 1996 Improvement
Bond Fund (the "Fund ") of the City, but the City is required by law to pay maturing
principal hereof and interest thereon out of any funds in the treasury if moneys on
hand in the Fund are insufficient therefor. The Bonds are issuable only as fully
registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of
single maturities.
Bonds maturing in the years 1998 through 2003 are payable on their
respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having
stated maturity dates in the years 2004 through 2007 are each subject to redemption
and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part and if in part, in
the maturities selected by the City and by lot, assigned in proportion to their
principal amount, within any maturity, on February 1, 2003 and on any date
thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus
interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set
for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the
Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his
address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such
mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the •
redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of
redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be
redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption
price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in
the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to
bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will
be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining
principal amount outstanding.
As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set
forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal
office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his
attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written
instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the
registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds
of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange, the City will
cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered
owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and
maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or
governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange.
-4-
•
The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in
whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this
Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other
purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice
to the contrary.
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED
that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State
of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in
the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation
of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have
been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied
or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the
Improvements and ad valorem taxes on all taxable property within the City,
collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than 5% in
excess of the principal of and interest on the Bonds as such principal and interest
respectively become due, and has appropriated the same to the Fund in the manner
specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 4; that, to take care of
any accumulated or anticipated deficiency in the Fund, additional ad valorem taxes
are required by law to be levied upon all taxable property in the City without
limitation as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause
the indebtedness of the City to exceed any charter, constitutional or statutory
• limitation.
This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be
entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Certificate of
Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual
signature of the Bond Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no
longer acting as Bond Registrar, one of the authorized representatives of the Bond
Registrar.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Hutchinson, McLeod County,
State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the
signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator and has caused this Bond to be
dated as of the date set forth below.
Date of Authentication:
City Administrator
•
-5-
Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution
mentioned within.
L-71
0
City Finance Director,
as Bond Registrar
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
the applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM -- as tenants UNIF TRANS MIN ACT .......... Custodian ..........
in common (Cult) (Minor)
TEN ENT -- as tenants
by the entireties •
under Uniform Transfers to
JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors
with right of
survivorship and Act .................... ...............................
not as tenants in (State)
common
Additional abbreviations may also be used.
•
-6-
• ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and
transfers unto , the within Bond and all
rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints
attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept
for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated:
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY
OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER
OF ASSIGNEE:
Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an
• "eligible guarantor institution'
meeting the requirements of the
Bond Registrar, which requirements
include membership or participation
in the Securities Transfer Association
Medalion Program (STAMP) or such
other "signature guaranty program"
as may be determined by the Bond
Registrar in addition to or in
substitution for STAMP, all in
substitution for STAMP, all in
accordance with the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NOTICE: This signature(s) to this
assignment must correspond with
the name as it appears upon the face of
the within Bond in every particular,
without alteration, enlargement or
any change whatsoever.
Section 3. Bond Terms. Execution and Delivery.
3.01. Maturities, Interest Rates, Denominations, Payment. The City
shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General
Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1996" and shall be payable primarily from
the 1996 Improvement Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof. The Bonds shall
bear a date or original issue as of September 1, 1996, shall be issuable in the
denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on
•
-7-
February 1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such •
years and amounts shall bear interest from September 1, 1996 until paid or duly
called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and
amounts as follows:
Year
Amount Rate
Year
Amoun t Rate
1998
$ 80,000
2003
$105,000
1999
90,000
2004
110,000
2000
95,000
2005
120,000
2001
95,000
2006
125,000
2002
100,000
2007
130,000
The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and,
upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by
check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. Each Bond shall be dated by
the Registrar as of the date of its authentication.
3.02. Dat ; Interest Payment Dates. Interest on the Bonds shall be
payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing August 1, 1997, to the
owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the
immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. Interest •
on the Bonds will be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30-
day months and will be rounded pursuant to the rules of the Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board.
3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond
registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration
and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as
follows:
(a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust
office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration
of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of
Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged.
(b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly
endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written
instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by
the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the
registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in
the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds
of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the
transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of
-8-
• any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest
payment date and until such interest payment date.
(c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the
registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver
one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as
requested by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in
writing.
(d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or
exchange shall be promptly cancelled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed
of as directed by the City.
(e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented
to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same
until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument
of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its
refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems
improper or unauthorized.
(f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar
may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the
• bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be
overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the
principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such
payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order
shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City
upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid.
(g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds
(except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar
may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the
Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid
with respect to such transfer or exchange.
(h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall
become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a
new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and
substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu
of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the
payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in
connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond
• was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon
-9-
furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, •
substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the
Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the
Registrar shall be cancelled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be
given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already
matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall
not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment.
3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints the
City Finance Director, as the initial Registrar. In the event that the City determines
to discontinue the book entry -only system for the Bonds as described in paragraph
(c) of Section 3.07, or DTC, as defined in Section 3.07, determines to discontinue
providing its services with respect to the Bonds and a new securities depository is
not appointed for the Bonds, the City will designate a suitable bank or trust company
to act as successor Registrar if the City Finance Director is then acting as Registrar.
The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and
upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor
Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar
and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar.
3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1998 through 2003
shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the
years 2004 through 2007 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the •
option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the
City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar
by lot, on February 1, 2003 and on any date thereafter at a price equal to the principal
amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At
least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City
Administrator shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the
Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in
or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of
proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure.
The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the
numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the
place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal
office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid,
the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date,
become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and
after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price)
such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest.
In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City
shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds
or portions thereof at least 35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or
-10-
Stelecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then in the
business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds
(such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New
York; Midwest Securities Trust Company, of Chicago, Illinois; Pacific Securities
Depository Trust Company, of San Francisco, California; and Philadelphia
Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more
national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal
bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to give any notice of
redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the
proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof.
Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part
in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall
receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of
such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the
unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered.
3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the
direction of the City Administrator and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the
signatures of the Mayor and the City Administrator. In case any officer whose
signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery
of any Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all
• purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery.
Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any
purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until
a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual
signature of the Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no longer
acting as Registrar, an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of
authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative.
The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence
that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the
Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City
Administrator to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price in
accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the
purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price.
•
3.07. Securities Depository. (a) For purposes of this Section the
following terms shall have the following meanings:
"Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond,
the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such
Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such persons subrogee.
-11-
"Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any S
successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds.
New York. "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York,
"Participant" shall mean any broker - dealer, bank or other financial
institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository.
City to DTC. "Representation Letter" shall mean the Representation Letter from the
(b) The Bonds shall be initially issued as separately authenticated fully
registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each
stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds
shall be registered in the bond register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of
DTC. The Registrar and the City may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and
exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of
the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to
be redeemed, if any, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered
owners of Bonds under this resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and for all
other purposes whatsoever; and neither the Registrar nor the City shall be affected
by any notice to the contrary. Neither the Registrar nor the City shall have any
responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial
ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or any Participant, or any
other person which is not shown on the bond register as being a registered owner of
any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any
Participant, with respect to the payment by DTC or any Participant of any amount
with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice
which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this
resolution, with respect to the selection by DTC or any Participant of any person to
receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with respect
to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds.
So long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the
Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on such Bond, and shall give all
notices with respect to such Bond, only to Cede & Co. in accordance with the
Representation Letter, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully
satisfy and discharge the City's obligations with respect to the principal of and
interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other
than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity
evidencing the obligation of the City to make payments of principal and interest.
Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has
determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be
transferable to such new nominee in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof.
•
-12-
• (c) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interest of the
Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds in the form of bond certificates,
the City may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the
Participants of the availability through DTC of Bonds in the form of certificates. In
such event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof.
DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds
at any time by giving notice to the City and the Registrar and discharging its
responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such event the Bonds
will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof.
(d) The execution and delivery of the Representation Letter to DTC by
the Mayor, in the form presented to this Council with such changes, omissions,
insertions and revisions as the Mayor shall deem advisable, is hereby authorized,
and execution of the Representation Letter by the Mayor shall be conclusive
evidence of such approval. The Representation Letter shall set forth certain matters
with respect to, among other things, notices, consents and approvals by registered
owners of the Bonds and Beneficial Owners and payments on the Bonds. The
Registrar shall have the same rights with respect to its actions thereunder as it has
with respect to its actions under this resolution.
• (e) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted
under paragraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished
upon receipt by the Registrar of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and
appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with
the provisions of this resolution. In the event Bonds in the form of certificates are
issued to owners other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as
owner of all the Bonds, or another securities depository as owner of all the Bonds,
the provisions of this resolution shall also apply to all matters relating thereto,
including, without limitation, the printing of such Bonds in the form of bond
certificates and the method of payment of principal of and interest on such Bonds in
the form of bond certificates.
Section 4. Security Provisions.
4.01. 1996 Improvement Construction Fund. There is hereby created a
special bookkeeping fund to be designated as the "1996 Improvement Construction
Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Construction Fund), to be held and
administered by the City Finance Director separate and apart from all other funds of
the City. The City appropriates to the Construction Fund (a) the proceeds of the sale
of the Bonds, and (b) all collections of special assessments levied for the
Improvements until completion and payment of all costs of the Improvements.
The Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Improvements,
• including but not limited to the transfer to the Bond Fund, created in Section 4.02
-13-
hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of interest and principal, if any, due •
upon the Bonds prior to the completion and payment of all costs of the
Improvements and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection
with the issuance of the Bonds set forth in Section 8 hereof. Upon completion and
payment of all costs of the Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Bonds
remaining in the Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in
part, of any other improvements instituted pursuant to the Act, as directed by the
City Council, but any balance of such proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid
to the Bond Fund.
4.02. 1996 Improvement Bond Fund. So long as any of the Bonds are
outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City Finance
Director shall maintain a separate and special bookkeeping fund designated "1996
Improvement Bond Fund" (hereinafter referred to as the Bond Fund) to be used for
no purpose other than the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds
and on such other improvement bonds of the City as have been or may be directed
to be paid therefrom. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Bond Fund (a) the
collections of special assessments and other funds to be credited and paid thereto in
accordance with the provisions of Section 4.01, (b) any taxes levied in accordance
with this resolution, (c) all income derived from the investment of amounts on
hand in the Bond Fund, and (d) all such other moneys as shall be received and
appropriated to the Bond Fund from time to time. If the balance in the Bond Fund
is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all bonds •
payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is
available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Bond Fund when the
balance therein is sufficient, and the Council covenants and agrees that it will each
year levy a sufficient amount to take care of any accumulated or anticipated
deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory tax limitation.
There are hereby established two accounts in the Bond Fund,
designated as the "Debt Service Account' and the "Surplus Account." All money
appropriated or to be deposited in the Bond Fund shall be deposited as received into
the Debt Service Account. On each February 1, the City Finance Director shall
determine the amount on hand in the Debt Service Account. If such amount is in
excess of one - twelfth of the debt service payable from the Bond Fund in the
immediately preceding 12 months, the City Finance Director shall promptly transfer
the amount in excess to the Surplus Account. The City appropriates to the Surplus
Account any amounts to be transferred thereto from the Debt Service Account as
herein provided and all income derived from the investment of amounts on hand
in the Surplus Account. If at any time the amount on hand in the Debt Service
Account is insufficient to meet the requirements of the Bond Fund, the City Finance
Director shall transfer to the Debt Service Account amounts on hand in the Surplus
Account to the extent necessary to cure such deficiency.
•
-14-
• 4.03. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional
bonds payable from the Bond Fund as may be required to finance costs of the
Improvements not financed hereby; provided that the City Council shall, prior to
the delivery of such additional bonds, levy or agree to levy by resolution sufficient
additional special assessments and ad valorem taxes, if any, which, together with
other moneys or revenues pledged for the payment of said additional obligations,
will produce revenues at least five percent (5 %) in excess of the amount needed to
pay when due the principal and interest on all bonds payable from the Bond Fund.
The additional special assessments, ad valorem taxes and moneys or revenues so
pledged, levied or agreed to be levied shall be irrevocably appropriated to the Bond
Fund in the manner provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61.
4.04. bevy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and
agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and
perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special
assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby
and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits
received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less
than twenty percent (20 %) of the cost of the Improvements. In the event that any
such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or
parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding
taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City's officers or
• employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any
condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree
that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings
as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon
such property. The Council presently estimates that the special assessments shall be
in the principal amount of $ payable in not more than
installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 199.
and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of percent
(_ %) per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until
December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable.
•
4.05. Ad Valorem Taxes. The full faith and credit and taxing powers of
the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of
and interest in the Bonds as the same become respectively due. For the purpose
there is hereby levied upon all of the taxable property of the City a direct, annual ad
valorem tax, which shall be spread upon the tax rolls prepared in each of the
following years and collected with other taxes in the following years and amounts as
follows:
-15-
Levy
Collection •
Year
Year Amount
1996
1997
1997
1998
1998
1999
1999
2000
2000
2001
2001
2002
2002
2003
2003
2004
2004
2005
2005
2006
The foregoing tax levies are such that if collected in full they will produce at least
five percent (5 %) in excess of the amount needed to pay when due the principal of
and interest on the Bonds. This tax shall be irrevocably appropriated to the Bond
Fund as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding and unpaid; provided that the City
reserves the right and power to reduce the levies in the manner and to the extent
permitted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61.
4.06. Full Faith and CrQdit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City
are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the •
interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Fund in
accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this resolution. It is
estimated that the taxes and special assessments levied and to be levied for the
payment of the Improvements will be collected in amounts not less than five
percent (5 %) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the
Bonds. If the money on hand in the Bond Fund should at any time be insufficient
for the payment of principal and interest then due, this City shall pay the principal
and interest out of any fund of the City, and such other fund or funds shall be
reimbursed therefor when sufficient money is available to the Bond Fund. If on
October 1 in any year the sum of the balance in the Bond Fund plus the amount of
taxes and special assessments theretofore levied for the Improvements and
collectible through the end of the following calendar year is not sufficient to pay
when due all principal and interest become due on all Bonds payable therefrom in
said following calendar year, or the Bond Fund has incurred a deficiency in the
manner provided in this Section 4.06, a direct, irrepealable, ad valorem tax shall be
levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City for the purpose
of restoring such accumulated or anticipated deficiency in accordance with the
provisions of this resolution.
Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as
provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this
•
-16-
• resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its
obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with
the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in
full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged
by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full
with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also at any time
discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law
now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably
in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or
securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United
States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest
payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be
required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due
thereon to maturity.
Section 6. Registration, Certification of Proceedings. Investment of
Moneys. Arbitrage and Official Statement.
6.01. Registration. The City Administrator is hereby authorized and
directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of McLeod
County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain
from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond
• register and that the tax required for the payment thereof has been levied and filed
as required by law.
6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the
County Auditor of McLeod County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare
and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel, certified
copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits,
certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the
legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and
records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all
such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished,
shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein.
6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from
time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its
officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the
Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), as
such are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issue of the Bonds, and
covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on
the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under such Code and Regulations.
The Improvements and any other improvements financed pursuant to Section 4.01
•
-17-
will be owned and maintained by the City and available for use by members of the •
general public on a substantially equal basis. The Citv shall not enter into any lease,
use or other agreement with any non - governmental person relating to the use of
such improvements or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the
Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" within the
meaning of Section 141 of the Code.
6.04. Arbitrage Rebate. For purposes of complying with the
requirements of Section 148(f)(4)(C) of the Code relating to the exemption of certain
small governmental units from the rebate requirements of the Code, the City
represents that:
(i) the City is a governmental unit with general taxing powers,
(ii) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" as defined in Section
141 of the Code (Private Activity Bonds);
(iii) ninety -five percent of the net proceeds of the Bonds are to be
used for the local governmental purposes of the City; and
(iv) the aggregate face amount of all tax - exempt bonds (other than
Private Activity Bonds) issued by the City in calendar year in
which the Bonds are to be issued is not reasonably expected to •
exceed $5,000,000.
Therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Section 148(f)(4)(B) of the Code, the City
shall not be required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs
(2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code.
6.05. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Administrator, being
the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds
pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the
Purchaser a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code,
and Section 1.148- 2(b)(2) of the Regulations, stating the facts and estimates in
existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to
expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause
the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of said Code and Regulations.
6.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as
"qualified tax - exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating
to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City
represents that in calendar year 1996 it does not reasonable expect to issue tax -
exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified
•
g
501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes
of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,000,000.
6.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds,
dated August 2, 1996, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and
Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. The officers of the City are hereby authorized
and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the
accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement.
Section 7. Continuing Disclosure.
(a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain
information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the
original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of
the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and
interpreted from time to time, the 'Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of
the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the
benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding
Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of
the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in
• respect of which continuing disclosure must be made.
If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 7, any person
aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take
whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce
performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this
Section 7, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance.
Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any
default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 7 constitute
a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution.
As used in this Section 7, "Owner" or "Bondowner" means, in respect of a
Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register
maintained by the Registrar or any 'Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined)
thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such
beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar.
As used herein, 'Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or
entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect
to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding
Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as
the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein,
•
-19-
"Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which •
have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have
been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been cancelled by the Registrar or
surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been
discharged as provided in Section 5 hereof.
(b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set
forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent
designated by the City, the following information at the following times:
(1) on or before 270 days after the end of each fiscal year of the City,
commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 1996 the following financial
information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information'):
(A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal
year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards
promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as
otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to
time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been
prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting
principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting •
the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to
accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of
the City; and
(B) To the extent not included in the financial statements
referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information with respect to the
City for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the
type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be
certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the
fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which
certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained
from governmental or other third party sources:
Current Property Valuations; Direct Debt; Overlapping
Debt; Debt Ratios; Tax Levies & Collections; Net Tax
Capacity Rates; Population Estimates;
Employment /Unemployment; Larger Employers; and
Larger Taxpayers.
Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements
are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date
-20-
unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial
statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt
thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements.
Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if
it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official
statements, which have been submitted to each of the repositories hereinafter
referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by
reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure
Information each document so incorporated by reference.
If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because
the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such
Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the
Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such
operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is
not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain
specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as
defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such
determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified
data regarding the replacement operations.
• If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 7 is amended as
permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the
next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an
explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the
type of financial information or operating data provided.
(2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following
events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined):
(A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies;
(B) Non - payment related defaults;
(C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial
difficulties;
(D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial
difficulties;
(E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to
perform;
(F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of
the security;
(G) Modifications to rights of security holders;
(H) Bond calls;
-21-
(1) Defeasances;
(J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the
securities; and
(K) Rating changes.
As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial
likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance
thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would
significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the
Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally
available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is
also an event that would be deemed "material" for purposes of the purchase,
holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as
interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event.
(3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following
events or conditions:
(A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure
Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at
the time specified thereunder;
(B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 7 .
pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment
or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under
paragraph (2) of subsection (d);
(C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this
Section 7 pursuant to subsection (d);
(D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the
financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information
are prepared; and
(E) any change in the fiscal year of the City.
(c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the
information described in subsection (b) to the following entities by telecopy,
overnight delivery, mail or other means, as appropriate:
(1) the information described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b), to each then
nationally recognized municipal securities information repository under the Rule
and to any state information depository then designated or operated by the State of
Minnesota as contemplated by the Rule (the "State Depository "), if any;
-22- •
(2) the information described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b), to
the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to the State Depository, if any; and
(3) the information described in subsection (b), to any rating agency then
maintaining a rating of the Bonds and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any
Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of transmission
under paragraphs (1) or (2) of this subsection (c), as the case may be, or, if such
information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such
information is to be released.
(d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation.
(1) The covenants of the City in this Section 7 shall remain in effect so long
as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however,
the obligations of the City under this Section 7 shall terminate and be without
further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of
Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or
administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the
requirements of this Section 7 will not cause participating underwriters in the
primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or
• laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof.
•
(2) This Section 7 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure
Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time,
without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the
consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the
office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond
Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be
subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or
supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises
from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of
the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better
complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 8 as so
amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of
paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving
effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming
that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or
supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such
amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the
Bondowners under the Rule.
-23-
If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, •
contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of
the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of
financial information or operating data being provided hereunder.
(3) This Section 7 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure
provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of
paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule.
Section 8. Authorization of Payment of Cerrain CQsts of Issuance of
the Bonds. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed on the date
of issuance and delivery of the Bonds to pay from the proceeds of the sale of the
Bonds, deposited in the Construction Fund the fees and expenses of the following
persons incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds up to the maximum
amount set forth opposite the name of such person upon receipt by the City of a
satisfactory statement therefor:
Service Maximum
Payee Perf_� Amount
Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota Financial Consultant
Moody's Investors Service, Rating of Bonds
Inc.
The claims of the above persons up to the maximum amount set forth opposite the
name of such person is hereby approved and no further action of this Council shall
be necessary in connection with the payment of such fees and expenses of issuance
of the Bonds.
Attest:
City Administrator
-24-
Mayor
•
0 The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following Councilmembers voted in favor thereof:
and the following Councilmembers voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, and was signed by
the Mayor, which was attested by the City Administrator.
0
0 -25-
C 1 I LIXICIIJIM
Resolved that the City of Hutchinson enter into Contract Number
with the state of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, to provide public
transportation service in the City of Hutchinson.
Further resolved that the City of Hutchinson agrees to provice 40 percent of the
total operating cost from local funds and 20 percent of the total capital costs.
Further resolved that authorization to execute the aforementioned Contract and
any amendments thereto is hereby given to the Mayor or the City Administrator.
Further resolved that the City Administrator or the Finance Director is hereby
authorized to execute requests for reimbursement from the Minnesota Department
of Transportation.
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented
to and adopted by the Hutchinson City Council at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the
13th day of August, 1996, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
Name
Title
0
• RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
Resolution No. 10718
WHEREAS, The City of Hutchinson Police Services and the McLeod County Sheriffs
Department are continuously seeking ways to improve cooperation in law enforcement
services in McLeod County;
AND WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Public Safety through its' "SAFE AND
SOBER" Program has specific grant monies available;
AND WHEREAS, The City of Hutchinson Police Services and McLeod County Sheriffs
Department have developed a cooperative enforcement program which meets the criteria
of the grant program;
AND WHEREAS, The McLeod County Board of Commissioners has authorized the City
of Hutchinson to serve as the fiscal agent;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. That the City Council authorized the Hutchinson Police Services, in
• cooperation with the McLeod County Sheriffs Department, enter into
a grant with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Office of Traffic
Safety, for the project titled "Safe and Sober Communities ", during the period
October 1, 1996, through September 30, 1997, in the amount of $23,200.00
(federal share).
2. That the City Council authorizes the Director of Police /Emergency
Management Services to execute such agreements as are necessary to
implement the project on behalf of the City of Hutchinson.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th Day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
11
Mayor
� —1,06' r-�
County of McLeod
830 11th Street East
Suite 106
Glencoe, Minnesota 55336
Fax (612) 864 -3410
COMMISSIONER RAY BAYERL COMMISSIONER ELOI A. HAMRE COMMISSIONER BEV WANGERIN
1 st District 3rd District 51h District
Phone (612) 485-2181 Phone (612) 562 -2129 Phone (612) 587 -6869
20778 Cable Avenue 600 Mobray - P O. Box 125 19369 Judson Circle -
Lester Praine MN 55354 Stewart . MN 55385 Hutchinson, MN 55350
COMMISSIONER MELVIN DOSE
COMMISSIONER SHELDON NIES
NAN CRARY
2nd Disincl
Phone (612) 864 -3304
41h District
Phone (612) 587 -5117
County Administrator
Phone
10782 State Hwy 261
1118 Jefferson Street South
(612) 864 -1324
Courthouse
Glencoe. MN 55336
Hutchinson. MN 55350
Glencoe. MN 55336
RESOLUTION / 96 -CB -41
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED, that McLeod County Sheriff's Department enter into
a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety,
Office of Traffic Safety for the project entitled SAFE & SOBER
COMMUNITIES during the period from October 1, 1996 through
September 30, 1997.
Duane Kopesky, Sheriff of McLeod County, is hereby authorized to
execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project
on behalf of McLeod County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Steve Madson, Hutchinson Police
Department, is hereby authorized to be the fiscal agent and
administer this grant on behalf of the McLeod County Sheriff's
Department.
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the McLeod
County Board of Commissioners on Julu 30,199E
— -
IGNED:
(Signature)
McLeod County
SheKi f
I " - I' Cf(4,
(Date)
WITNESSETH:
(Signature)
McLeod County Board Chair
(Date)
s-
9
•
N,4W �-� I" %4Minneso rt fb= c S c a
A #pliCafp oSO `f Kh
Agency (ies)
Hutchinson Police Department, McLeod County Sheriff's Department
Lead Agency:
Project Director's Typed Name:
'Hutchinson Police Department
Chief Steve Madson
Project Director's Mailing Address
10 Franklin St. Std
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Director's Tel pho
Directors FAX
320 -587- 42
320- 587 -6472
Projec Peri Sta Date: Oct. 1, 1996 End Date: Sept. 30, 1997
Sign cure t e Pro'e rector
Title
Date
e P irecto
Chief of Police
"-- ow
Via su. ro .the o"�ta a statements �_
Completed Resolution to apply for and expend Safe & Sober grant funds is attached.
_\
Resolution is in process. Briefly indicate where in the process the resolution is e.
P ( g., on the next
meeting's agenda;
awaiting additional council hearings; etc.) and an approximate date when the resolution will
be complete.
If more than one agency, indicate where in the process each resolution is.
Resolut
n i it Chief of Police and scheduled for approval by Hutchinson
City Co
n 06 -96.
Pesolu
is wit McLeod
ounty Sheriff Duane Ko eskv and is t^ be approved
b' _cL
Count-, card of
ommissioners.
Si natu f,
e P irecto
Date
L
Return completed proposals to:
Safe & Sober Campaign
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Office of Traffic Safety
. 444 Cedar Street
Suite 100 -13, Town Square
St. Paul, MN 551 01 -21 56
J/-
SAFE & SOBER PROJECT PROPOSED BUDGET
Lead Applicant Agency: Hutchinson Police jeo, mkt
Proposed Federal Bud et Onl
Federal Safe & Sober Budget Summary
Category Federal Amount Percent {Federal amount divided
by federal budget total)
1. Overtime Enforcement Hours Budget $ 23, 1-00
2. Discretionary Budget $ 1,900
8
Federal Budget Total $ 25,100
100
Note: Federally paid overtime enforcement hours should equal at least 85% of the total federal budget.
On all the following budget forms, "federal share" refers to the amount of money you are seeking in
Safe & Sober grant funds and "Agency share" refers to the cost commitment by your agency or
Private sources. The column "total cost" refers to the sum of the federal share and the agency share.
Part 1: OVERTIME ENFORCEMENT HOURS
Group' Overtime Fringe
Number of Total cost
Federal
Agency
rate/hour
hours
share
share
McLeod County s0 /0 25.00 0
384 9,600
9
600
0
Hutch PD /OT 25.00 0
544 13 600
13 600
0
ec Event OT /Hutt 25.00 0
287 7 175
0
7 175
L ke Bonanza Educa 25.00 0
10_ 2,550
0
2 550
Total overtime
'Rank
$32,925
§23,200
$9,725
or seniority -- groupings of officers with
similar salaries
PART 2: DISCRETIONARY BUDGET
Summary' of Discretionary Budget
Purpose Federal Share
Local Share
Total Cost
Administration
0
Equipment
15 523
15 528
Operating
Travel 910
�_)?
L
1,000
0
1 0
Incentives
TOTAL $
S
1,900
1c,480
18,190
Detailed on following page
i�
L
Pr"Icm Idenlifleation
McLeod County is located adjacent to the seven- county, metropolitan area, bordering
Career County's Nest side, The total area of the count% is approximateh 600 square miles. and
the population is 32.824. Hutchinson is the largest commtmit� in McLeod Countv with a
population of 13.000. It has been identified b% the state demographer's office as one of the
fastest growing cities in greater Minnesota.
Historically, McLeod County has been agriculturally based, however, there continues to
be a steady growth in the industrial job market. Hutchinson is the home of Hutchinson
Technology Inc. (HTI), a private company that produces approximately 90 percent of the world's
suspension drives for computers. The city is also the home of one of the largest 3M Co. plants in
the world. The two companies boast a combined employment base of nearly 5,000 people.
Among those are both local residents and commuters.
Hutchinson is also the economic hub of McLeod county. Many- county residents
commute to Hutchinson even day to work, shop. and spend their leisure time.
The primary highways in the county are state highways 7, 15 and 22 and U.S. Highway
• 212. State Highway 7 and U.S. Highway 212 are the main arteries into the metropolitan area.
State highways 15 and 22 are the main arteries to the north and are extremely busy on holidays
and weekends throughout the year.
Highway 7, with its two -lane design and numerous cures and hills, presents one of the
main traffic safety problems within the county. The combination of the highway's design and the
increasing amount of traffic from the metropolitan area has led to a number of fatal accidents.
Highway 7 is scheduled for reconstruction, a project that is designed to help alleviate some of the
problems created by its design, but until then. additional enforcement is our only tool to counter
the deadly combination of speed and lack of seat belt use.
There have been 15 fatalities on Highway 7 in the last five ears. Last year alone, there
were six fatalities and 342 injuries in AN ing motor vehicle accidents countN wide.
Other problems law enforcement agencies regularly encounter are impaired drivers and
youth-alcohol- related offenses. The number of arrests for D'�ld offenses have nearh_ doubled in
Elie cite of Hutchinson since 1993.
0 A growing trend % %ith people younger than the legal drinking age is organizing their
--)6. 6!0
Parties in remote, niral arras of the county. After attending the parties, these same individuals
try to drive horse. The sheriff's department cannot possibly coyer such a wide physical area %%ith •
its regular patrol. Overtime hours and extra[ cnlivicentent are crucial in creating a highly visible
la%k entixcement presence, thereby demonstrating to these individuals that the chances of getting
caught are high.
When DWI checkpoints xt ere permitted. mcl.cod County had a strong show of support
from them. In one checkpoint alone, there were six DUI arrests and another 20 alcohol- related
citations.
During special events, such as youth and adult dances and community -wide celebrations,
law enforcement agencies have made numerous arrests for alcohol - related offenses after the
event has shut down. The problem we have experienced is that when an officer makes an arrest,
the processing of that individual requires that officer to be out of service while additional
offenders are left unchecked.
McLeod County is ranked higher than the state average in four out of the five categories.
One of the most disturbing statistics is the county's ranking of 81 for deaths involving failure to
use seat belts.
McLeod County ranks 29th stateAide in alcohol- related deaths and injuries per 100.000
residents, and 70th per 100 million miles traveled- Both of these figures are above the state
average.
•
nbjectivcs
• There are two main ohiecti%es for Our proposed Safe & Sober campaign program in 1997.
The first is to increase DWI arrests by 10 percent. The second is to increase seat belt use b% 10
percent. Data on the second would be ohtained by taking informal surveys on the main
highways. state highway 7. 15 and 22. and U.S. Highway 212. and within the city of Hutchinson.
During our Safe & Sober ov enime enforcement we will also strive to achieve the contact
goals. Both the McLeod Count} Sheriffs Department and the Hutchinson Police Department
have eery dedicated. aggressive officers. and we feel these goals will not only be attained. but
likely exceeded.
By the end of the campaign, our ultimate goal is to see a drop in our ranking for fatal
accidents compared with state averages. It is hoped that by increasing enforcement, we will be
able to decrease the average speed and increase seat belt usage. This combination should have a
positive effect in helping us reach our goal.
•
n
U
Description of .activi(ies
U
The cit) of I lu (Chin son and its police depart ment have ah%a%s been committed to
education as the first line of defense. The most visible indication of that commitment is the
Police Departments full -time school liaison officer and full -time intervention officer. The two
share the duties of teaching Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) and CounterAct
curriculums in the public and private schools. They also work with at -risk youth to prevent them
becoming serious offenders. These officers also work closely with families and with McLeod
County Social Services to ensure that the youth of the community are provided with safe
environments and to help families find resources to help them through difficult times.
The Police Department's dedication to protecting and educating the community's youth is
also evident in its safety education programs. An example of this is the overtime hours the
department has dedicated during the last two years to enable the Hutchinson Police Department
Mountain Bike Patrol to teach the rules of bicycling and in -line skating, and also how to bicycle
and in -line skate more safely. For the last two years. the department has hosted a "Bike and
Blade Bonanza." The program is focused on children and allows them to receive a free bicycle •
equipment safety check . The children also participate in an obstacle course that teaches them
how to ride safely and how to handle hazardous situations they ma} encounter while biking or
skating. Community support for this program has been exceptional. Everyone who has attended
the event for the last two years, both children and adults, who did not have a helmet, has received
a free one. More than 500 were given away in the last two years.
In fall of 1996, the department is planning a program to teach school bus safety to
kindergarten students, many of whom have never ridden a bus.
The local media has proven to be extremely supportive of the department's programs and
has printed and aired every request the department has made involving past Safe & Sober events.
Patrol Officer Eric Kilian of the Hutchinson Police Department has worked with the local
newspaper. the Hutchinson Leader, to educate area residents on the Safe & Sober campaign.
Kilian has also worked with two local radio stations. KARP Radio and KDUZ Radio. both of
which have dedicated air time for public safety messages. McLeod County Sheriffs Depute
\iron R iemiller will be working with another area newspaper during the Safe & Sober •
campaign to ensure all county residents are aware of both the goals and the results of the project.
• Kilian, a I lurchinson Iligh School graduate and former member of Students
Against Drunk Driving (S.A.D.D.), will be working closely with the local S.A.D.D. chapters to
increase awareness among area youth about the elTects of impaired driving. Wiemiller, a
Winsted native, has maintained contacts with youth and schools in the eastem portion of McLeod
County. Together, the two have a strong support and resource system within the county to assist
with the Safe & Sober campaign.
11
n
U
Period one: Impaired Drivine
Prior to the start of the campaign. the McLeod*County Sheriffs Department and •
Hutchinson Police Department will work with the local media to publicize plans for the
upcoming holidaN season. This will ensure that residents know law enforcement officers will be
out working on the campaign. and they will know whx.
The plan is to implement four (4) overtime shifts on each Friday and Saturday night.
Two of the shifts will be from the McLeod County Sheriffs Department and two will be from the
Hutchinson Police Department. Included in this plan are week nights that present a high
probability for people driving impaired, and also New Year's Eve. The overtime shifts will begin
at 8 p.m. and end at 4 a.m. This is to ensure an adequate law enforcement presence long after the
area bars have closed.
The plan includes working "saturations" involving the entire county. Concentration will
be the major state and county highways. There will also be a "zero - tolerance" rule in effect.
At the end, we will inform the media of our statistics during the program, statistics will
be maintained for just the Safe & Sober campaign, separate from the routine patrol. •
Period 2: Youth
As stated previously, the plan is to focus efforts on Friday and Saturday nights during the
Safe & Sober campaign. There are five school districts located either entirely or partially within
McLeod County, and each district has its own prom celebration. The plan is to saturate the area
of a school hosting a prom and the city of Hutchinson. Previous contacts with vouth have
revealed that a large number of students from other school districts gather in Hutchinson on
Friday and Saturday nights throughout the year. The time period for this would be from ? p.m to
3 a.m. This ensures law enforcement officers are present while the students are tra%eling to and
from their dinners as well as after the dances have ended.
Additional day shifts are also planned during Memorial Dav weekend which is
historically a busy traffic weekend.
Safe & Sober literature will be distributed to the schools %%ith the helpof the S. -y -[) 1).
chapters throughout the year and prior to prom. •
As stated previously. zero- tolerance will be in effect.
• Again. each day will consist of approximaick li)ur shifts, two from the Hutchinson Police
Department and two from the McLeod County ShcritTs Department.
Iva I- =I
As with the other portions of the program, the media will be contacted before and after
the campaign.
Approximately four extra shifts will be used each day. Those shifts will cover every day
of the July 4th holiday weekend, and a mix of day and evening shifts will be used. This will
enable officers to promote safe driving throughout the day.
Many people travel through the county during the day enroute to cabins, lake homes and
campsites in the northern part of the state. However, the county has its own share of lake activity
during the Fourth of July weekend. The night shifts will promote safe driving for those
individuals who celebrate within the county. Most of the patrol activity will focus on the west
side of the county where there are two county park campgrounds.
A zero - tolerance policy will again be in effect.
Once again, the media would be contacted both before and after the campaign.
This portion of the plan will involve approximately four shifts per day. The major
concentration will be during the Labor Day Weekend. Once again, we will work a mix of day
and afternoon shifts, thus providing ample coverage throughout the weekend. The other
enforcement period is the weekend prior to Labor Day, and a couple of weekdays. This will
allow us to determine seat belt usage during "normal" traffic conditions i during the .reek) versus
during holiday traffic weekends. The efforts will include rural and urban enforcement.
As with all of the other efforts. a zero- tolerance policy will be in effect.
Other enforcement areas would possiblN include saturations during, community -based
• celebrations such as Hutchinson's JayCee %'arer Camival in June. Sii�er Lake. Pola- Czech}
Days in August. and other special events throughout the year. These would be run with the same
specifications as the other saturations. I he percent of overtime ouside the Safe R Sober •
windows will only he about 5 percent.
Each period has roughh the same amount of coverage. The youth period has more than
the rest due to the greater number of weekends invoked and the number of school districts
within the county.
In the last five years. there have been a significant number of new officers added county-
wide. This would be a tremendous opportunity for everyone to get to know one another and
should also help in building camaraderie between different agencies.
The cost of dispatch and supervisory services for this program would be paid for by the
departments.
•
•
Training needs
• All officers With the Hutchinson Police Department have been trained in the Standardized
Field Sobriety Testing (SFS'F) course. Most of the Mcl,cod County Deputies have been trained
in SFSI as well.
All of the Hutchinson Police Department officers and most of the McLeod County
Sheriffs Deputies need to take the Occupant Protection Usage and Enforcement (OPUS) course.
Officer Kilian has received approval from Chief Steve Madson to have the Hutchinson Police
Department host an OPUE class. With this class, we would satisfy the training needs for the
Hutchinson Police Department and McLeod County Sheriffs Office. Officers who have not been
trained in SFST will be attending that class as soon as one is available. Chief Madson stated the
department will host a class regardless of whether the two departments receive the grant.
Also. there will be two representatives from each department who will attend the Safe &
Sober workshop. Money for this is available in the discretionary budget.
0
•
Evaluation
All contacts Hill be recorded on computer through the McLeod County and Hutchinson
Police Department dispatch. Officers who work on the Safe & Sober overtime campaign \\ill be
required to keep a log during their overtime shifts. This will enable us to accumulate accurate
statistics and to track our progress during the campaign and to determine whether the program is
meeting the stated objectives. It will also allow us to track the results of our pre- and post-
seatbelt surveys and our informational releases.
•
•
Reports and Plans
• Depuly Wiemiller and Officer Kilian will take responsibilitc for submitting all necessarc
paperwork during the Safe & Sober campaign.
Final plans will be submitted before each step is implemented. The dates for these are
November 22. 1996. March 26. 1997: June It. 1997. and August I. 1997. \\ "e will also submit a
plan prior to any enforcement outside the Safe & Sober periods.
We will turn in progress reports after the conclusion of every enforcement period. They
are due January 13. 1997; June 10. 1997; July 23. 1997: and September 13. 1997. We will
submit progress reports after the conclusion of any outside enforcement campaigns.
We will also turn in the results of the informal seat belt surveys taken throughout the
campaign. We plan on receiving assistance through youth organizations and driver's training
classes. These surveys will be done according to Safe & Sober deadlines.
The final report will be submitted by Novemter 15, 1997.
•
•
Equipment
fvery patrol deputy with the McLeod County Sheriffs Department has his or her own
marked patrol squad. I hese squads are equipped with radar units and preliminary breath testers.
The Hutchinson Police Department has six marked patrol squads equipped with radar units and
preliminary breath testers.
Both the sheriffs department and the Hutchinson Police Department have mobile
command posts which can be utilized.
Both departments also own intoxilyzer units. The sheriffs department is located on the
east side of the county and the Hutchinson Police Department on the west side, which can help in
decreasing processing time for DUIs b% enabling officers to take offenders to the nearest
available intoxilyzer.
•
0
• RESOLUTION NO. 10720
AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF PLEDGED SECURITIES
FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO., HUTCHINSON, MN
WHEREAS, Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
a city depository, has requested release of the following security
under the collateral agreement with the City of Hutchinson:
US Treasury Note 08 -15 -96 $ 500,000.00
(cusip 912827L75)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
• THAT the City Finance Director be authorized to release the
requested securities.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
• City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
�4(0
0
August 9, 1996
C
MEMO
We have been requested to call for a public hearing on the
financing of industrial development bonds for Hands Inc.. The
financing will be issued and in the name of Winthrop Minnesota.
• Jerry Gilligan, Dorsey Whitney, our bond counsel, is preparing a
resolution which would set the date for September 10, 1996 at 6
p.m.. The reason for this public hearing is that while the debt is
under the city of Winthrop property is owned in the city of
Hutchinson and by IRS regulation a hearing is required. It appears
there is no exposure for the City.
My understanding
consultant from
hearing.
doC \COMEMI3
isCitr Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hatchinson, 31h' 55350 -2522
(320) 587 -5151
Fax(320)234 -1210
is representatives from Hands Inc and a financial
Fahey Ward & Wiles Inc. will be present for the
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street Sli
llatchinson,ll.V 55750 -3097
(320) 587.2975
Fax (320) 234 -4240
Printed on recrrlad paper -
Police Senvrecs
10 Franklin Street S1$
Hutchinson, 11.A' 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 587 -6427
..., o,a "h�hl Hi UEI
CERTIFICATE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
I, the undersigned being the duly qualified City Administrator of the
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that-
1- As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original
which the attached resolution was transcribed. record from
2. I have carefully compared the attached resolution with the original
record of the meeting at which the resolution was acted upon.
3. 1 find the attached resolution to be a true, correct and complete copy
of the original:
RESOLUTION NO. 10721
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT ON BEHALF
OF HANDS, INC. UNDER THE MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT;
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TITEREON
4. I further certify that the affirmative vote on said resolution was
ayes' nayes, and absent/ abstention.
5. Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof, as
required by law, and a quorum was present.
WITNESS my hand officially as such Administrator and the seal of
said City, this day of 1996.
(SEAL)
Gary D. Plotz,
City Administrator
*�UU'
A
•
1, . ... _ ..,.. _ I „ llutkaL . aLl ?L1
• RESOLUTION NO. i 0 7 21 _
RESOLUTION RELATING TO A PROJECT ON BEHALF OF
HANDS, INC. UNDER THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT; CALLING FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING THEREON
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota (the "City "), as follows:
SECTION 1
I.I. Representatives of Hands, Inc., a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
"Corporation '% have advised this Council of their desire to refinance all or a part of
the outstanding indebtedness previously incurred by the Corporation to finance the
acquisition and improvement of facilities of the Corporation in the City and in the
City of Winthrop, Minnesota.
12. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through
469.165 (the "Act'), to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of
properties used and useful in connection with a revenue - producing enterprise. The
Corporation is proposing that the City of Winthrop issue its revenue bonds under
the Act to refinance the indebtedness of the Corporation incurred to finance the
acquisition and improvement of the facilities of the Corporation in the City and in
the City of Winthrop. The consent of the City is required in order for the City of
Winthrop to issue bonds under the Act to refinance indebtedness incurred to
finance facilities in the City.
SECTION 2
2.1. The Act requires that this Council conduct a public hearing on the
proposal that the City of Winthrop issue bonds to refinance the indebtedness of the
Corporation. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and
regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to the issuance of the
Bonds, this Council approve the issuance of the Bonds, after conducting a public
hearing thereon. A public hearing on the proposal to undertake and finance the
Project is hereby called and shall be held on September 10, 1996, at 6:00 o'clock p.m.
The City Administrator shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in
the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general circulation in the City,
at least once not less than fourteen (14) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the
date fixed for the public hearing.
0
,]aud
.. u,h DLI n :Itl 411004
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson on this 13th day .
Of August, 1996.
Attest
City Administrator
(SEAL)
Mayor
0
-2- 0
0
E
4OW4K *yd
RESOLUTION NO. 10722
APPROVING PUBLIC AUCTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
WITHIN CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
REINSTATING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON TAX FORFEITED LAND
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT the following property has been declared tax
forfeit by the McLeod County Auditor.
THAT the following property is authorized by this City
Council to be sold at public auction.
THAT the following property has assessments which have
been unpaid and declared delinquent
THAT the city wishes to reinstate all delinquent
assessment against the following parcel including interest from
time of delinquency
That the property declared delinquent by the McLeod
County Auditor is described as follows:
Lot
3
Block
1
California
2nd
Addition
23.312.0030
Lot
4
Block
1
California
2nd
Addition
23.312.0040
Lot
5
Block
1
California
2nd
Addition
23.312.0040
Lot
8
Block
1
California
2nd
Addition
23.312.0080
Lot
9
Block
1
California
2nd
Addition
23.312.0090
THEREFORE City hereby reinstates all assessments and
delinquent charges against the above described property from the
Page 2
Resolution no. 10729
date said property first became delinquent with interest added
from said date.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of August 1996
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
0
0
ST. ANASTASIA CATHOLIC CHURCH
• City of Hutchinson
Fee: APPLICATION FOR BINGO LICENSE Approved by:
Building
Fire
Application shall be submitted at least Police
days prior to the bingo occasion
I, flF_NV&Q C- &Qe62 AND I, �� yCrcj IV3TZ --4
Name of Authorized Officer Name of Designated Bingo Manager
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct
the game of bingo in accordance with the provisions of City of
Hutchinson Ordinance No. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 for
the license year ending
ature
Authorized Officer of Organization Zthe ignate Bingo Manager
A. The following is to be completed duly authorized officer
of the organizations:
1. True Name: YFC !L l
• last A l fC irst middJ�e�,�
2. Residence Address: O L,¢er S mow- CCl/N��✓ / t/
street city state zip code)
3. Date of Birth: 3 S 4. Place of Birth /
�-
(mo. day ear) city & state
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes NO If yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated bingo manager
of organization:
1. True Name: r<<
last first middle
2. Residence Address: 7'�ST, i�til1L9�✓/11N�'�3�C
street city state zip code)
3. Date of Birth: S _ -- 3 g 4. Place of Birth:. //A/.
(Mo., day & year) city & state
5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes —
NO If yes, explain
R
Cb cD $ 6. How long have you been a member of the organization?
CI
CI iR 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action
designating you bingo manager.
C. Game Information:
1. Place where bingo games will be played, gStAS f 4 •
2. Date or dates bingo will be played 3 yf7r
(date and or day s of week)
3. Hours of the day bingo will played: From L_C:� to Ay
—�
4. Maximum number of players P.M.
5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? O!1 Sf�
6. Will refreshments be served during the time the games are
being conducted? Yes No If so, will a charge be
made for such refreshments? Yes NO
D. Organization Information:
1. Address where regular meetings are held _�(� LAKC— Sf• - {�UrCrfll� /.
2. Day and time of meetings 3P0
3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the
state of Minnesota? Yes � No
4• H6w long has the organization been in existence?
4a. How many members in the organization? - -�
5. What is the purpose of the organization? 1GiCjcrs •
6. Officers of the Organization.:
Name Address Title
- 7y67C -•V -so AJ 01} PA �ti a2-
.�
niYl NONF� �' �C
7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services
to the organization:
Name Address Title
•
•
•
D. Organization Information: (Continued)
8. In whose custody will organization records be kept?
Name � r s LYC'� /_ -r Address 41(yG L ,4VE Si - 464r -crli iliv
9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by players whi_-
participating in the bingo game, or while on the licensed
premises, please state the
Name of Insurer (}}Rklle /447 -604and Policy No.
10. Have you (1-tanager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing the operation of bingo games?
11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization.
E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity
bond given by the bingo manager in favor of the organization:
1. Name of bonding company C,aTHCI-+(` illur0A
2. Address of bonding company
3. Amount and duration of bond
4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding
requirements. Yes No
I declare that the information I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance NO. 655 relating to bingo,
and I will familiarize myself with the contents thereof.
Signature of authorized officer of organization.
Date:
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this
Day of , 19_
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this
Day of 19_
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
0
E
suoiLr-TERN $50.00
JYITI"
RETAIL "ON SALE"
otate of AftitIC150ta,
COUXTY OF ,, 4cLe.o,d.. City Hutchinson
of _1 � . .. ......
To the City Council of the City of Hu.t.c..hi.n,s.o.n..... .. . ... I
State of Minnesota:
hereby appli 45_for a lloewe for the term of...-
J. (,J0_,C.. V..7
from the dayof.. ......... ... . ..... 0
At Retail Only, Non-Intoxicating Malt Lkaors,
as the came are defined by law, for consumption "OX" lbage *plain promises in tho,
.- . . I I . . . ...... ... . . ......... . . . Clay_.... . _..........of ...... --.Ji,,t,hjn,,n - - ------
described " follows, to-wit: 0A q..LA & L f
at which place ,,aldapplicant__. operate..
and to that end represent. and state. -as follows:
That said applicant _._...._.._is.. 4 of the United sfofW; of good moral oharaot4;r
and repute; and ha5 .... attained the age of f1 years; prvpritar_,f the
establishment for which the license wUl be iarwad if this application ij granted.
That W manufacturer of such ncn intozieatinjj mail liquors has any ownership, in w" air iiw part,
in said lnidbspe of said applicant... or any interest therein;
That said applicant ....make. _.this application pursuant and rabjea to all the laws of the Stats of
s,d the —dinar., and of wH
applicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby obeerv, and obey the same;
(e . tea.. I.a . V .. a r...1 rw.r.[r.)
Recommend approval with restrictions and requireme the past.
Driver's License I.D. to be required for purchase.� j
Steve Kadson—,--Police Chief
Each applicant further states that —he is not noa, the holder of, nor has --he made application for,
nor does --he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
1 Dated._._ 19_
•
P. O. efddreaw ......... . .
4-2),
•
0
•
/- Form No. 2J6- erd..e.M r..
au
�s.. dneu
RETAIL "ON SALE" �tJ I Jl1L o 0 FM
fltate of Ainne5ota,
COUXTY OF McLeod .
To the City Council
OF
of the Cit ). ..................._._....of.. Hutchinson
.... .. ..... _ .............. State of Minnesota:
McLeod County Agricultural Association
hereby aPPi -_.for a liocnse for the term. of 5 ... Days . - ___...- -- _ . _ ..... ... .._.__.
from the _ -_..A th ... _ _... ...... day of.- _. ... August_..._._ -__ ....... 1895__, to Sal
At Retail Only, Non - Intoxicating Malt Liquors,
w the same are de fined by law, for conau.mption "Oh"' those eeviain premises in the _..._- ._.._.._ .__......_.._
.. .....____ ...... ____._ __.... City .... .... . ... .._._.of ._.._....Hutahlnsan..__ ...
described a, fallowa, ea- wu:...._ McLeod _Count
y. F.a.%.rgr.0 s...-_.. 8. egr__ G. a.rdee_- _- ..- --- ,.-- -.._.___...
at which place said applicant, ..... operate bu4l s of.._. Sall .ing..dn- Sale_ tpal.i...l.iquors---- .._...._._
and to that end represent._.. and etaia__..a foiloeos:
That said applicant _...._._ is- a..._. _._._. _- _eitixn......_of the United States; of goad moral ellaraetsr
an4d repute; and ha _...attained the aje of 21 years; that_. ..__. ._ ........ ._._...propridoroJ the
establishment for which the license will be issued if this application is granted.
That no manufaetarw of such non- intaeicatin( molt liquors has any aanershlp, in whole or in part,
in said business of said applicant .. or any interest therein;
That said applicant .... make ... this application pursuant and rub /eel to all the kuse of the Stale of
.tlinnesota and the ordinances and rejuiationS of _ ----------
-- ...._— ......
applicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereef, and hereby aQree._-to obseroe and obey the same;
... ._ ..........................___ ..__....__.._._..._. .- _...__...__-- ..._ ..... _ ..... _
IHw .w w rgW,a.ru u ur. i 4mI �.NY1ae)
Recoamiend approval with restrictions and requirements as in the �ast.
—�
Driver's License I.D. to be required for purchase.
Steve Mddson, Police Chief
Each applicant further states that —he is not now the holder of, nor has—he made application for,
nor does _he Intend to make application for a Federal Retail Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
Datsd __July. 30 199.6.- - -, - -. 18,__
-F Ric. �Q/
Mrl eod o B1 v Aaric,Yjtu t soclation
- dppllemst......
P. O. dddaess. P:O.•__. Box 142
6.350_.._._._.. —_-
ze7
BESIDENTIar FURCHI-8E AGREEMENT
•this THIS RESIDENTIAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT is made and entered into
day of August,
Lorraine Wright, Selers and the City Oft Hutch Hutchinson, Wright
municipal corporation, Buyer. ght and
a Minnesota
RECITALS:
I. Lorraine Wright and Norman Wright are the fee owners of
certain real estate located at 196 Third Avenue North, Hutchinson,
Mn. 55350, legally described as follows:
Lot 91 Block 29, excepting railroad right of way thereof,
North One Half of the City of Hutchinson. Property
Identification No. 23- 0870 - 000 -01,
Identification No. 23- 423- 00- 00 -00. Property
2. Norman D. Wright is the owner of certain real estate
located at 186 Third Avenue N.W., Hutchinson, Mn
McLeod . 55350, which
property is located in County and is legally described as
follows:
Lot 8, Block 29, North One Half of the City of Hutchinson.
Property Identification No. 23- 0869- 000 -01, Property
Identification No. 23- 0423- 00- 00- 00 -00.
Of Hutchinson Norman Wright
chinsonwithan unsolicitednoffergto sell the above described
Property to the City of Hutchinson and the City desires to accept
the offer to sell the property.
4. The parties hereto have entered into this written purchase
agreement to memorialize this transaction.
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt
and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties do
agree as follows:
1 • FER AND ACCEp r n u[ F
agrees to Sellers offer to sell and Buyer
Purchase the above described real estate located in the
County of McLeod and State of Minnesota. Sellers may remove any
personal property or fixtures from the property so long as the
structural integrity of the buildings located on the above
described real estate is maintained. Any fixtures or personal
property remaining on the premises on the date Buyer takes
Possession shall be the property of the Buyer and the Buyer shall
be entitled to dispose of said property in whatever man er it sees
fit.
�-,,� {i.Crcc; ?e5 ?n�:: �7e ✓,o�.�( �J /o Elf /h
2. PRICF ANn S. Vl[ ETLq �
property included in this sale is Six e /elr, c
SixThousand and no /100 Dollars
($6,000.00) which Buyer shall pay by check in the full amount on 11(i
the date of closing.
-1-
3• DEED AND ARxETABLE TIT F
deliver a general warranty deed," Sellers shall execute and
parties holding an interest in spouses and other described
property, conveying marketable title, subject to:
a• Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and
federal regulations;
b. Restrictions relating to use or improvement of the
property without effective forfeiture provisions;
C. Reservation of any mineral rights by the State of
Minnesota;
d• Utility and drainage easements which do not
interfere with existing improvements;
4• REAL ESTATES AND SPErr 7
pay all real estate taxes due and A AaaFSC7rr,ame Sellers shall
and 1997. Buyer shall a Payable in calendar years 1996
subsequent pay all real estate taxes in 1998 and
years. Buyer shall be responsible for all special
assessments payable on or after the date of closing.
5 • E ' R BO fND RY LINF
A r�tt R STRlcTgl
WA88ANTIES Sellers warrant that buildings, if an Nn
r,.�
within the boundary lines of the property. Y. are entirely
there is a right of access to the real property Sellers warrant that
of way. Sellers warrant that there hae een no labor porlmaterial
furnished to the property for which payment has not been
Sellers warrant that there are no present violations of made.
restrictions relating to the use or improvements of the property.
Thane warranties shall survive the delivery of the deed.
6. S.ONDITroN OF PROPERTY
substance or Petroleum Sellers know of no hazardous
P products having been placed, stored or
released from the property by any person in violation of any law
nor of any underground storage tanks having been located on the
Property at any time. Sellers understand that Buyer's obligation
to complete this purchase agreement is contingent upon the absence
of any hazardous substance or petroleum products and that Buyer
may, at Buyer's sole option, withdraw from this purchase agreement
if any such substances are present on the premises. Sellers'
warranties and representations contain in this paragraph shall
survive the delivery of the deed. The property is sold As no express or implied representation or warranties b� with
physical conditions, quality of construction Y Sellers as to
fitness for a particular purposes. workmanship or
7 - NOTICE DIS[incrro
from any Sellers have not received an
governmental authority as to the violation of any olaw,
ordinance or regulation affecting the property. If the
subject to restrictive covenants, Sellers have not rce property ed any
notice from any person as to a breach of the covenants.
8. POS ON Sellers shall deliver •
property not later than the date of closin which of the
agreed shall be October 15, 1996. The g Parties have
parties have agreed that
Norman Wright shall be permitted to occupy 196 Third Avenue until
August 1, 1998. / Sellers shall be entitled to salv ge of 196 Third
Avenue no latef than August 1, 1998 in any event As a condition
of continued .'occupancy, Norman Wright agrees.' to maintain the
property in ,a safe and habitable condition.
V- ��L?'G2i;; >h pa55i;j� >;
9. EXAMINATION OF TITTF 9c p
Within a reasonable time after he
acceptance of this agreement, Sellers shall furnish Buyer with an
Abstract of Title or a Registered Property Abstract certified to
date including proper searches covering bankruptcies and State and
Federal judgments, liens and levied and pending special
assessments. Buyer shall have ten (10) business days after receipt
of the Abstract of Title or Registered Property Abstract either to
have Buyer's attorney examine the title and provide Sellers with
written objections or, at Buyer's own expense, to make an
application for a Title Insurance Policy and notify Sellers of the
application. Buyer shall have ten (10) business days after receipt
of the Commitment for Title Insurance to provide Seller with a copy
of the Commitment and written objections. Buyer shall be deemed to
have waived any title objection not made within the ten (10) day
period, except that this shall not operate as a waiver of Sellers'
covenant to deliver a statutory warranty deed, unless a warranty
deed is not specified above. If no Abstract can be found,
production of an Abstract shall be the responsibility of the Buyer.
10. TITLE CORRECTIONS AND REMEDIES,
from receipt of buyer's written title Sellers
objectsonsl to ake0ti ays
i tle
marketable. Upon receipt of Buyer's title objections, Sellers
shall, within ten (10) business days, notify Buyer of Sellers'
intentions to make title marketable within the 120 day period.
Liens or encumbrances for liquidated amounts which can be released
by payment or escrow from proceeds of closing shall not delay the
closing. Cure of the defects by Sellers shall be reasonable,
diligent and prompt. Pending correction of title, all payments
required herein and the closing shall be postponed.
a. If notice is given and Sellers make title marketable,
then upon presentation to Buyer and proposed lender of
documentation establishing that title has been made
marketable, and if not objected to in the same time and
manner as the original title objections, the closing
shall take place within ten (10) business days or on the
scheduled closing date, whichever is later.
b. If notice is given and Sellers proceed in good faith to
make title marketable but the 120 day period expires
without title being made marketable, Buyer may declare
this agreement void by notice to Sellers, neither party
shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other, and
earnest money shall be refunded to Buyer.
• C. If Sellers do not give notice of intention to make title
marketable, or if notice is given but the 120 day period
expires without title being made marketable due to
Sellers' failure to proceed in good faith, Buyer may
-3-
seek, as permitted by law, one or more of the following: •
1• Proceed to closing without waiver or merger in the
deed of the objections to title and without waiver
of any remedies, and may: (a) seek damages, costs
and reasonable attorneys, fees from Seller as
permitted by law (damages under this subparagraph
(a) shall be limited to the costs of curing
objections to title, and consequential damages are
excluded); or (b) undertake proceedings to correct
the objections to title;
2. Rescission of this purchase agreement by notice as
provided herein, in which case the purchase
agreement shall be void and all earnest money paid
hereunder shall be refunded to Buyer;
3. Damages from Sellers together with costs and
reasonable attorneys, fees as permitted by law;
4. Specific performance within six months after such
right of action arises.
d. If title is marketable, or is made marketable as provided
herein, and Buyer defaults in any of the agreements
herein, Sellers may elect either of the following
options, as permitted by law:
1• Cancel this contract as provided by statute and
retain all payments made hereunder as liquidated
damages. The parties acknowledge their intention
that any note given pursuant to this contract is a
down payment note, and may be presented for payment
notwithstanding cancellation;
2. Seek specific performance of this agreement within
six months after such right of action arises,
including costs and reasonable attorneys fees, as
permitted by law.
e• If title is marketable, or is made marketable as provided
herein, and Sellers default in any of the agreements
herein, Buyer may, as permitted by law:
1• Seek damages from Sellers including costs and
reasonable attorneys, fees;
2. Seek specific performance within six months after
such right of action arises.
TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE FOR ALL PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT. •
11. RELOCATTON ASSISTANCE Buyer and Sellers mutually agree to
the following:
-4-
a. Sellers hereby understand that Sellers may be eligible
for relocaiton assistance, services, payments, and
benefits in accordance with the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970, as amended, as well as the regulations implementing
this Act (hereinafter "URA") and Minnesota Statutes
§117.52 and $117.521.
b. Sellers acknowledge that relocation assistance, services,
payments, and benefits would include relocation advisory
services, comparable property referrals, moving payment
claims which could include a fixed payment or costs for
a professional mover, payment of closing costs for the
subject property and the replacement property, mortgage
differential payment which compensates an owner for
increased mortgage interest cost if a mortgage exists,
and a new one is taken on the replacement property, and
a housing replacement that would pay for increased costs
for replacement property. These and other assistance,
services, payments and benefits are provided for per the
URA. Subject payments could amount to $60,000.00.
C. Sellers acknowledge that they can receive additional
information relative to relocation assistance, services,
consultantni 800- 553 -2092. However, the if the Sellers do not make further inquiries to the Buyer, or the Buyer's
relocation consultant, than they in effect waive any
rights per Minnesota Statute 5117.521 and the URA.
d. Sellers expressly agree that this provision also applies
to any fixtures on the subject property which Sellers may
have an interest in pursuant to a lease or by reason of
law and which Sellers do not move from the subject
property. Sellers will provide a bill of sale if
necessary to the Buyer for any fixtures where such an
interest may exist and which Seller does not move from
the subject property.
e. Sellers shall make no further claims to the Buyer
involving the relocation from the subject property or for
any said fixtures in which Sellers have an ownership
interest and that Sellers do not relocate. Sellers
expressly declare and agree that all relocation and URA
related claims, past, present and future have been
settled. Sellers expressly agree that all statements
made herein shall bind it, its successors /or assigns.
Sellers further release the Buyer from any liability for
any additional claims they may be entitled to receive
under the URA.
f. Sellers have a clear intent to sell the subject property
by the Buyer through negotiation and Sellers' intent was
demonstrated by the Sellers' solicitation of the Buyer to
Purchase the subject property prior to any action by the
C&I=
Buyer involving property the purchase of said property.
g• Sellers expressly state and affirm that Sellers make all
statements herein under no threat or duress, and that
this clause and provision in this purchase agreement is
based on the Sellers' desire to sell the subject property
to the Buyer.
12• MINNESOTA LAW, This contract shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
13. WELL DISCLOSURE. Sellers certify that Sellers does know of a
well on the described real estate. Buyer shall seal said well at
Buyer's expense.
14. DEMOLITION, an`n upetherproperty which is a the Buyer ubjectt of this to
Purchase agreement. Buyer shall be responsible for all expenses
relating to clean up and removal of structures and Sellers shall
have no responsibility for any such expenses. Buyer agrees to use
its best efforts to save as many trees as possible.
Norman D. Wry ght
Lorraine Wr ght
i
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
By:_
Its Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator
/7-;,/" Ve /V07-2, 51rfkf Vl� Oc, 07-2,
pN Nr SeAr� e K erase : L
1Zae 7�o,d -t� AT rye C, >zy
;cJ ou �� t�4Ke C!li„� a-{ f' •rF�nSe o � %f(e Se��cli .f_ fG
i
Cc%e
WA-Alt -7'1 e 11K/ r` (.0 r`o Qc!` �� vw;l
To P (oG , <e i-/ e �iorxl ^ccS� O�tfjrc�C� % P ['�`� rl�Cue
UJ,4117' 710 c(U
(J� /9) io s MM /V e- r l if to ieloc-"o-7-e-
7� blues tia «-se fa�Uy/ -151)
-t -, 6;1e6dfdl O°
lJV CS lnl-i i5 4!R c'i��j e/}5 zrOerSe Q-110 �i/iv//tcc 1
TA, , ,$ i3 Very IMP - -7 +O A7T t6 lCS -�O l f- ✓ e- -7`/i ",5 /1
00
CJil( P.�p / "tciaf� T{.�s 'Cry M ,7�r5 I's /'� /(y /Yirsf
9
9
' CI>11r oo NIrtcNIRSO�
do CENTER
• 1I1 MASSAN SIREET SE
APPLICATION HUTOFUNSOK W1 553%2W
FOR
PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS
2" x 2" Picture NAME and DRIVER'S ICENSE INFORMATION
required _
NAME: Cc014 —IJt
• How many days?
0
PERMANENT ADO*�S5: - -DI 1 K
PERMANENT TELEPHONE: � 2!
- Cqn Tcr�,QR�M�✓
�
TEMPORARY LOCAL ADDRESS:
TEMPORARY TELEPHONE ACCESS:
DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER (STATE )_(/
HEIGHT_ WEIGHT_ EYE COLOR_
FEES E LENGTH OF PERMIT REQUESTED
Months?
Or year?
LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Application Fee of $25 applied towards the following permit fee(s)
Solicitors, per day ......... ............................... $ 25.00
Solicitors, per year ........ ............................... $200.00
Transient Merchants, per day ............................... $ 25.00
Transient Merchants, per year .............................. $200.00
Peddlers, per 'Aay ........... ............................... S 25.00
Peddlers, per year .......... ............................... $200.00
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR VIOLATION OF ANY
MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES 6X!E=,NO
IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PONISHMENT 0 PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE:
DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED: r
U 1IPmm+
DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY:
DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE OF SUPPLY - NAME & ADDRESS OF SUPPLIER:
A s
i
PROVIDE TWO (2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR CHARACTER REFERENCES:
NAME S ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
NAME b ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
STATE LAST CITY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY:
CITY /STATE NAME:
DATE OF ACTIVITY: FROM:
-2-
TO: � �]
L
• I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica-
tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.*
•
•
I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the
Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance No. 673 is guilty of
a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex-
ceeding $500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus,
in either case, the costs of prosecution.
Si SfWA,Re of ArDl ifcCnt Dat�
• No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one
week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required
Picture.
-3-
RELEASE OF IVFOR 'Mo-,
As an applicant for a PeddlersiSolicicorsiTransienc Merchants License from
t ^e Cit? of Hutchinson, Y,innesota, I am required to furnish inforration wni;:.h that
a3' • =ay use in deterrinin moral
3 my , physic =1, recta: and financial q� :3 :_fica-
ticns. In this connection, I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all i =-
.`or=ation which you may have concerning me, including inf3r=ation of a
or.privileged nature.
I hereby release the agency with which I am seeking application for license,
and any organization, company or person furnishing infor —.i tion to that agency as
e�ressly authorized above, from any liability for da =ay ^e which may result from
furnishing the information requested.
Applicant's Full
Printed Vaae:
Applicant's Address:
Applicant's Birth Date:
Applicant's Place of Birth:
0
(Month) Dav) r•_._�
Applicant's Social Security No.:
Applicant's Driver's License No.:
Dat.z: 1—�ac4
M-1 I Pa. ON W � , � / rj
CIR OF xurCMlNial
111 ! MNSTREET SE
APPLICATION "UTCHINSOKYN 5&1%=
FOR
PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS
2" x 2" Picture NAME and DRIVER'S LICENSE INFORMATION
required
NAME: �BjeRE-iJ k(ot�1 cz S .
PERMANENT ADDRESS: 10`` 2\3 � � oA�iV4q *`7
PERMANENT TELEPHONE: l b f 2 1 2 2, <{ FSO o ST PAu C
� S'SioS
TEMPORARY LOCAL ADDRESS:
TEMPORARY TELEPHONE ACCESS:
DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER (STATE)_(/
HEIGHT WEIGHT_ EYE COLOR
LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Application Fee of $25 applied towards the following permit fee(s)
Solicitors, Per day ......... ............................... S 25.00
Solicitors, per year ........ ............................... $200.00
Transient Merchants, per day ............................... S 25.00
Transient Merchants, per year .............................. $200.00
Peddlers, per day ........... ............................... S 25.00
Peddlers, per year .......... ............................... $200.00
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR VIOLATION OF 15pY�
MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES NO I/
IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PUNISHMENT OR PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE:
-e'-,
FEES
& LENGTH
OF PERMIT REQUESTED
.
How many days ?_
Months ?_
Or year?�
LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Application Fee of $25 applied towards the following permit fee(s)
Solicitors, Per day ......... ............................... S 25.00
Solicitors, per year ........ ............................... $200.00
Transient Merchants, per day ............................... S 25.00
Transient Merchants, per year .............................. $200.00
Peddlers, per day ........... ............................... S 25.00
Peddlers, per year .......... ............................... $200.00
BACKGROUND STATEMENT
HAVE YOU BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR VIOLATION OF 15pY�
MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES NO I/
IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PUNISHMENT OR PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE:
-e'-,
DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED:
a
DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY:
v
0
DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE OF SUPPLY - NAME & ADDRESS OF SUPPLIER:
L7 1,1 c7
0
PROVIDE TWO (2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR CHARACTER REFERENCES:
NAME 3 ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
NAME 6 ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
STATE LAST CITY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY:
CITY /STATE NAME:
DATE OF ACTIVITY: FROM: I S TO: 27
•
-2-
. I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica-
tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.*
I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the
Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance No. 673 is guilty of
a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex-
ceeding S500 or by imprisonment for a exceeding 90 days or both, plus,
in either case, the co pro
No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one
week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required
picture.
OFFICE USE
POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION:
C
U
-3-
RELEASE OF INFORXATIO.s
As an applicant for a Peddle rs /So licitors /Trans Len c )'erchants License from
t=e City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, I am required to f_r—.. :sh info ration which that
_„y use in deter — .fining my coral, phys'_cal n a: a fi :•
a r,anci l oca.__ ca-
ticns. In this connection, I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all i=-
forration which you may have concerning me, including info ration of a c:nf_'ent =a:
or privileged nature.
I hereby release the agency with which I am seeking application for license,
and any organization, company or person furnishing infor- -ation to that agency as
a- pressly authorized above, from any liability for da=age which may result from
furnishing the information requested.
Applicant's Full
Printed Nare:
Applicant's Address:
Applicant's Birth Date:
Applicant's Place of Birth:
�Firat) Al
I"
(uiddIa)
was
•
E"
Applicant's Social Security No.:
Applicant's Driver's License `:o.:
:)at:l G
S-
(Month) (Day) (`ear)
l- O►Q0oN EN�I�kN
(City) (State)
SJp.
•
• PUBLICATION NO. 4942
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER:
THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 1996
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, August 13, 1996
during the course of their regular meeting which starts at
• 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of City Hall for the
purpose of:
0
submitting the Adams Street Small Cities Rehab Grant application.
This hearing will be held by the City council
of the City of Hutchinson. At such hearing, all persons interested
may be heard.
July 26 1996
Date
K/j Y7, irl I'l tI . T�
�/ '
Ll
.055 A, SUSSMAN
NEAL J. SHAPIRO
SAUL A BERNICK'
THOMAS O. CREIOMTON
SCOTT A. LIFSON
OAVIO 1t. NIGHTINGALE'
PaVt J OUA5T*
THERESA M, KOWALSKI
111111. J. MELTSER
.0..RT -, v LOSE
BERNICK AND LIFSON
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 1200, THE COLONNADE
5300 WAYZATA 8011EV. -O
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5541E -1270
TELEPHONE 16121 5AO -1200
FACSIMILE I612) Sae -1003
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street South
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2422
Dear Mr. Plow
August 7, 1996
4UC :F 1y96
C', _
ALSO AOMITTCO IN WISCONSIN
sI_ SC CEATin CO PUeuC ACCOVNIANT
L(OAL A55191A111
JO GROWN
JOAN M, SCHUL.CRS
KATHRYN O, MASTCRMAN
Enclosed please find a revised Consent Resolution and Waiver, and a newly negotiated
• Merger Fee Reimbursement Agreement regarding the merger of Triax and DD Cable. The
revised Resolution and associated Waiver and Agreement ensure the company's payment of your
fees related to reviewing this transaction. The enclosed revised documents are acceptable to the
cable company. Further, these modifications do not affect the substance of our report.
If you have already adopted the original Resolution, please call our office to receive further
instructions from me or Robert Vose.
After adoption of the enclosed revised Resolution, and after signing the enclosed
documents in all places provided for city signature, please send the signed originals to our office.
We have already forwarded a counterpart of the Agreement signature page to the merging
companies for their execution. We will return a fully executed copy of the Agreement to you once
all signatures are secured. Please keep a copy of the Resolution for your records.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
BERNICK AND LIFSI P.A.
• Thomas D. Creighton
TDC /rs
Enclosures
cc: Ms. Jane E. Bremer h ` /e^
CONSENT RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE TRANSFER OF
CONTROL OF AND CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS IN
A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISEE; SUBJECT AND
CONDITIONED UPON COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
WHEREAS, the cable television franchise of Hutchinson (the "Franchise ") is currently
owned and operated by DD Cable Holdings, Inc. ( "Holdings "); and
WHEREAS, Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. ( "Triax "), DD Cable Holdings, Inc., DD
Cable Partners, L.P., and various subsidiaries of DD Cable Holdings, Inc. (collectively "DD
Cable ") and certain new investors have entered into a Contribution Agreement dated April 5, 1996
(the "Contribution Agreement ") wherein they will create a new entity ( "Merged Entity") to
assume the franchise obligations of Holdings, and Hutchinson (the "Authority") has received a
valid and complete request from Holdings for consent to the transfer of control of and certain
ownership interests in Holdings (the "Transaction "); and
WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that subject to certain conditions which must
be met, Holdings possesses the requisite legal, technical and financial qualifications:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Transaction is hereby consented to
by Authority and permitted subject to the following conditions:
1. Payment by Triax, DD Cable and/or the Merged Entity of all reasonable fees
related to this Transaction and incurred by Authority.
2. Triax and DD Cable, inclusive of Holdings, and the Merged Entity shall each
execute a waiver of any rights relating to supposed procedural defects regarding
the Authority's review of this Transaction; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, failure to comply with Paragraphs numbered 1 and 2
above shall convert this Consent in its entirety to a denial of the Transaction.
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, no notice of breach or default under the Franchise has
been issued by Authority within the past 12 months and none is outstanding; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Merged Entity may, at any time and from time
to time, assign or grant or otherwise convey one or more liens or security interests in its assets,
including its rights, obligations and benefits in and to the Franchise (the "Collateral ") to any
lender providing financing to the Merged Entity ( "Secured Party"), from time to time. Secured
Party shall have no duty to preserve the confidentiality of the information provided in the
Franchise with respect to any disclosure (a) to Secured Party's regulators, auditors or attorneys, •
(b) made pursuant to the order of any governmental authority, (c) consented to by the Authority
or (d) any of such information which was, prior to the date of such disclosure, disclosed by the
/n'
• Authority to any third party and such party is not subject to any confidentiality or similar
disclosure restriction with respect to such information subject, however, to each of the terms and
conditions of the Franchise; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that the consent to the Transaction herein provided shall
be effective upon and only effective concurrent with the closing of the transactions described in
the Contribution Agreement.
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that this consent shall be the final action required by the
Authority regarding the Transaction consented to herein, provided that nonmaterial, non-
substantive changes are authorized hereto if in the judgment of legal counsel to Authority such
changes are necessary to comply with local, state or federal law, or otherwise required to prevent
the necessity of this consent returning to Authority for action, thereby exceeding the federally
prescribed time requirement related hereto.
ADOPTED by this _ day of , 1996.
•
Attest:
Clerk - Treasurer
Hutchinson
Mayor
The undersigned, being the duly appointed, qualified and acting Clerk of Hutchinson,
Minnesota hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. is a true, correct and accurate
copy of Resolution No. _ duly and lawfully passed and adopted by Hutchinson on the
day of , 1996.
Clerk
•
EXHIBIT A •
WAIVER
This _ day of 1996, Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. ("Triax "), DD
Cable Holdings, Inc. ( "Holdings "), DD Cable Partners, L.P. ( "Partners ") do for themselves,
their general partners, and their heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, waive,
release and forever discharge the Authority and its directors, officers, employees, successors,
personal representatives, heirs, and assigns, relating to alleged procedural defects including, but
not limited to, the procedure outline in Minn. Stat. § 238.083 regarding the Authority's review
of the merger transaction described above. •
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Release on the day set forth above.
TRIAX MIDWEST ASSOCIATES, L.P. DD CABLE HOLDINGS, INC.
By: By:
By: By.
DD CABLE PARTNERS, L.P.
0
Its •
• MERGER FEE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the following municipalities or municipal consortia: The Cities of Prior
Lake, Waconia, Hermantown, Morris, Maple Plain, Brooten, Hancock, Hutchinson and Mound,
the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission and the Greater Grand Rapids Area Cable
Commission ( "Authorities'); have retained an independent legal consultant and have conducted
a thorough and complete review of the merger of Triax Midwest Associates, L.P., DD Cable
Holdings, Inc., DD Cable Partners, L.P., and various subsidiaries of DD Cable Holdings, Inc.
(collectively "Companies") as mandated by law; and
WHEREAS, the Authorities and the Companies agree that resolution of certain issues
related to the Companies' payment of the Authorities' fees incurred in reviewing such merger is
mutually beneficial.
NOW, THEREFORE:
1. The Companies agree to pay all reasonable fees incurred by and on behalf of the
Authorities in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for all of the Authorities (represented herein by
Bernick and Lifson, P.A.);
• 2. The Companies agree to not withhold or offset against current or future franchise
fee payments to the Authorities any amounts to recoup payment of the Authorities' reimbursement
herein except as is specifically set forth herein;
10
3. The parties agree that the Companies may withhold or offset amounts payable
pursuant to paragraph 1 herein from current or future franchise fee payments to the Authorities
only in the event of a final adjudication involving the parties hereto by a court of competent
jurisdiction requiring that such reimbursement for expenses be included in franchise fee payments;
4. The Companies reserve the right to seek such adjudication by a court of competent
jurisdiction;
5. The Authorities reserve the right to contest and appeal any such adjudication;
6. The Companies agree that any withholding or offsetting against franchise fees shall
not be made until after a final adjudication, if any, requiring the withholding or offsetting of such
franchise fee payments; and
cL ✓v\
7. Nothing herein shall limit or condition the merger consents issued by the
Authorities, if any, or any of the individual above - referenced municipalities or municipal
consortia.
City of Hutchinson
By_
Its
Triaz Midwest Associates, L.P.
a
CACABLE W UTCHINS \PAYMENT. AGM
DD Cable Holdings, Inc.
LO
DD Cable Partners, L.P.
By
Its
•
40
0
•
.033 A. SUS5MAN
N [AL J. SMArIRO
SAUL A. SCRNICK'
THOMAS D. CMEIGHTON
SCOTT A. LIFSON
DAVID K. NIGHTINGALE'
.AUL J. OUAST'
THERESA M. KOWALSKI
RCSCCCA J. HELTZCR
ROECRT J. V. VOSC
BERNICK AND LIFSON
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 1200. THE COLONNADE
SSOO WATLATA ROULCV.ARO
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 35416-1270
TCLE /HONE (6121 5.6 -1200
FACSIMILE (6121 SA6'1003
MEMORANDUM
4]O •OwlTr[O In wISCOnSIM
•LSO curinco Aunm AccounT•K+
LEGAL A ISTAMTS
JO SROWN
JOAN M. SCHULKCRS
KATHRYN O. MASTCMMAN
TO: Clients Currently Served By Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. and
DD Cable Partners, L.P.
FROM: Thomas D. Creighton, Robert J. V. Vose, Theresa M. Kowalski
RE: Request for Approval of Merger of Triax and DD Cable
DATE: July 31, 1996
FINAL REPORT, ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
Please find below a summary and analysis of the proposed transaction regarding the
merger of Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. and DD Cable Partners, L.P. (hereinafter referred to
as "Current Owners ") into Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as "Merged
Entity")
Federal Communications Commission Form 394 ( "FCC 394 ") dated April 13, 1996, was
received by the various Franchise Authorities (hereinafter "Authority" or "Authorities ") on dates
ranging from April 15 through April 19. The confidential supplemental information to FCC 394
was dated April 17, and received by Authorities on or about April 22 -23, 1996. Federal law
• provides for a 120 day review period from the date of receipt of FCC 394, together with all
5-i-
I
MEMORANDUM •
July 31, 1996
Page 2
exhibits and any additional information required by the terms of the Franchise Agreement or
operative state or local law. Although additional information was required and received from the
Merged Entity, for the purpose of this report, only the 120-day period is calculated from the date
of receipt of the confidential documents supplementing FCC 394. Authorities should therefore
conclude their review on or before August 20, 1996.
The purpose of this report is to provide the Authorities with an understanding of the
transaction and the standard for review
INNEWL nq0 •►
At the time of awarding the original Cable Communications Franchise and in subsequent •
transfers, if any, of the Franchise, the Authorities considered and approved the technical ability,
financial capacity, legal qualifications and character of the original and subsequent owners of the
cable system, as well as other appropriate factors. These same qualifications are to be considered
and reviewed as part of the review by Authorities of the merger of the Current Owners. The
sources of information used in examining these factors included FCC 394, its exhibits. the current
Franchise Ordinance, various FCC rules and regulations regarding cable communication systems,
the Merged Entity's Response to the Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for
Approval of Transfer of Control, and the Merged Entity's response to questions regarding
confidential information (Form M), along with direct oral communications with representatives
of Merged Entity.
U
• MEMORANDUM
July 31. 1996
Page 3
All levels of government have something to say about such mergers. The local franchise,
Minnesota state law, federal law and FCC rules all apply to this merger. Many Authority's
Franchises require that Authority review the merger pursuant to the same standards used to award
the original, Franchise. Minnesota law, Minn. Stat. § 238.083, provides that the local franchising
authority must consider a written request to approve a transfer of ownership, and the franchise
authority cannot unreasonably withhold such approval. Minnesota law also arguably requires a
shorter review period than the 120 days, with certain procedural requirements which have been
complied with by Authorities. However, in any event, we have opined that it is more probable
• than not that the federal statutory time of 120 days preempts those state statutory timelines which
are inconsistent with federal timelines.
2. STANDARD OF REVIEW.
The Authority's task in this process is to review the information provided regarding the
merger and to approve or deny the merger of the Current Owners. The Franchise Authorities
have the express right to approve or disapprove such a merger. The standard of review is that
the Authority's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the purpose of determining
whether it will consent to the merger, the Authority has made inquiry into the legal, technical and
financial qualifications of the Merged Entity, a well as other appropriate factors.
In analyzing the transaction, the Authority must consider whether the Merged Entity meets
all of the criteria originally considered in the granting of the Franchise. Note, however, that this
40 analysis is not a comparison between the Current Owners and the Merged Entity. Rather, this
MEMORANDUM •
July 31, 1996
Pace 4
analysis is an application of factors to determine whether the Merged Entity satisfies the standards
to the reasonable satisfaction of the Authority.
The Authority should focus on the following factors in determining whether to approve
or deny the merger:
Legal and character qualifications of the Merged Entity;
ii. Technical ability of the Merged Entity;
iii. Financial stability of the Merged Entity; and
iv. Other appropriate factors.
This office has conducted an extensive review of all relevant materials on behalf of the •
Authority. This report is a "shorthand" synthesis of that review in an attempt to fully inform the
Authority without overwhelming the decision - making body with detail and minutia. Obviously,
our review extended far beyond the summary of this report, and we will be available to further
expand on this summary should the Authority have any questions.
3. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSACTION.
The merger will place substantially all of the assets of the Current Owners under the
management and control of a restructured Merged Entity. The Contribution Agreement outlines
the terms of the merger between Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. and DD Cable Partners, L.P,
its wholly owned subsidiary, DD Cable Holdings, Inc., and all its wholly owned subsidiaries
( "DD Cable Group "). As a part of the merger, existing limited partners' interests will be
r1
U
• MEMORANDUM
July') 1, 1996
Page 5
redeemed and new equity investors (V5&A Communications Partners II, L.P., Equity - Linked
Investors, II, L.P., and DLJ Investment Partners, L.P.) will become limited partners.
The merger will be accomplished through the contribution of assets of the DD Cable
Group to Triax Midwest Associates, L.P., which will operate the cable systems. In addition to
the limited partnership interest, all existing liabilities of the DD Cable Group will be assumed by
the partnership and DD Cable Partners, L.P. will be paid $4,200,000 for out -of- pocket costs
associated with the merger. The current limited partners, whose interests are being redeemed,
are to be paid $44,500,000. The Agreement does not identify the current limited partners or
• specify how much is to be paid to each limited partner.
The Revised and Restated Partnership Agreement is the governing document for the post -
merger ownership of the cable franchises. The partnership is a limited partnership and the limited
partners have no management and control except for such issues as dissolution or replacing the
general partner. The existing general partner, Triax Cable General Partner, L.P., is to be
replaced by Triax Midwest General Partner, L.P.
The business of the partnership is run by the general partner in conjunction with an
advisory committee. The advisory committee is made up of people appointed by the general
partner and some of the new equity partners. The advisory committee has the power to
preapprove business decisions to the general partner before they are implemented. The
partnership is to be conducted in accordance with the five year business plan of the partnership.
•
MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Page 6
The Partnership Agreement provides that a priority return of 13 % internal rate of return will be
paid to Triax Cable and each limited partner.
The Partnership Agreement provides that its existence will end on December 31, 2006.
This raised some concern in analysis and the Merged Entity was asked to clarify the termination
of the Partnership Agreement. In its response, the Merged Entity stated that on or before
December 31, 2006, the Partnership Agreement could be extended or the systems divested to a
new entity. Any such divestiture would require the review and approval of the Franchise
Authority, therefore, this termination date is not of concern to this analysis.
n
�J
Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC, is providing management services for the •
partnership. Triax will provide such services for the operation of each of the cable systems
subject to this merger. Under the Agreement, Triax is required to oversee the operation of the
systems, but the work is actually performed by partnership employees. Triax Telecommunications
Company, LLC, will receive a management fee equal to 4% of the gross revenues of the
partnership. The fee is to be paid in monthly installments of $275,000, but is capped at an annual
amount equal to 4% of gross revenues. The analysis generated some concern over the magnitude
of this fee. Our concern is that the syphoning of such large amounts of money off the top of the
operations of a cable system might tend to leave less money available for those things important
to the City, such as system upgrade upon franchise renewal. It is, of course, impossible to tell
from the information available to us whether there would be upward pressure on the rate as a
result of such fees. Triax' response is that Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC, is an •
• MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Pase 7
experienced national company which has in the past and will continue to provide valuable
management and leadership expertise to the operating systems.
While this fee is of concern to this analysis, it does not rise to the level of a reasonable
basis for withholding approval of the merger. Suffice it to say, however, that the Franchise
Authorities should factor the existence of such fees into any responses received from the Merged
Entity that resources are simply not available to comply with franchise requirements or enhance
the operation of the system.
Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC, is responsible for keeping the books and
• records of the partnership and preparing the financial statements of the partnership. The cost of
Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC employees, as well as the cost of preparing the
financial statements, is to be paid by Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC. The partnership
is responsible for paying for an annual audit of the financial statements and the preparation of the
partnership tax return.
The term of the Management Services Agreement is equivalent to the term of the
partnership. Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC is not required under the Agreement to
devote all energies and resources to the partnership's system management. In addition, the
standard of liability for Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC is determined to be gross
negligence or fraud. The partnership will indemnify Triax Telecommunications Company, LLC
for any liability resulting from actions which do not arise to the gross negligence or fraud
• standard.
MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Pace 8
A chart showing the current ownership /control structure of DD Cable entities is attached
hereto as Exhibit 1. The current ownership /control structure of Triax entities is attached hereto
as Exhibit 2. A post -merge chart is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
4. LEGAL QUALIFICATIONS.
The legal qualifications standard relates primarily to an analysis of whether the Merged
Entity is duly organized and authorized to own the cable systems. It should be noted that current
federal law is shifting dramatically regarding the ownership of cable systems. However, this
transaction is not affected by those changes in federal law. Since you basically have Triax
0
absorbing the DD Cable holdings through a merger, you are not faced with many of the cross- •
ownership issues addressed in federal law. We have reviewed the current law and found that this
transaction is not affected by such rules. According to the FCC 394 and resulting responses to
inquiries, both original owners were qualified to transact business in the State of Minnesota as
is the Merged Entity. We have reviewed those corporate documents available to us and have
determined that the Merged Entity will be legally organized and constituted sufficient to pass the
standards of the lending institution such that further review on the Franchise Authorities' part
would be duplicative and an unnecessary expenditure of funds. The purchase documents require
that the Merged Entity be duly organized and qualified to operate the cable systems.
5. CHARACTER QUALIFICATIONS.
In response to our Request for Additional Information, the Merged Entity has represented
that it has not been convicted in a criminal proceeding relating to any of the usual inquiries •
• MEMORANDUM
July 31. 1996
Page 9
regarding character. The character qualifications of the Merged Entity, as well as the individuals
involved, are satisfactory.
Based upon our review of the information provided, it would appear that the Franchising
Authorities could not reasonably withhold approval of the merger based on the legal or character
qualifications of the Merged Entity or its principals.
6. TECHNICAL ABILITY.
The technical ability factor relates to the technical expertise and experience of the Merged
Entity in operating and maintaining a cable system. This analysis focuses on the current and
• former experience of the proposed owner. As to the management of the cable operations, it
appears that the overall Triax management structure will survive. Inquiries were made as to local
management, and the Merged Entity advised the Authorities that while they have tremendous
respect for current local managers, obviously this merger is taking place for the purpose of
consolidating such functions. No decisions have been made by the Merged Entity, but a review
of the existing management structure is promised post- merger.
Experience has shown that the Franchise Authorities can assume a consolidation of
management functions and no doubt a consolidation of local offices. The closing of a local office
is often a traumatic experience for an Authority, and those Authorities which require local offices
in their franchises will retain that authority to approve or disapprove the closing of such local
offices. That being said, however, it is often very difficult to withstand pressure from a new
is owner who is determined to close a local office.
MEMORANDUM •
July 31, 1996
Page 10
Experience has shown that the perpetuation of local management structures do not survive
for the long term, so it is necessary for the Authority to investigate the management abilities and
style of the parent entities.
Information has been provided concerning Triax' experience in owning, operating and
managing cable systems. We have reviewed the information provided by Triax as it relates to
cable management experience.
Triax is an experienced cable operator. The Merged Entity will pass 361,000 homes and
serve 242,000 customers under common management and control. The transaction is explained
as providing a significant opportunities for enhanced customer service and choice. is
Mr. James DeSorrento has served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Triax
since the company's formation in 1982. He has had cable television experience since 1970. He
has had various management and operational responsibilities through the cable industry. Mr. J.
R. Busch has served as President and a Director of Triax since January of 1988. He is a 20 year
veteran of the cable industry focusing on corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions. The rest
of the management team of Triax has significant experience in the cable television industry.
While Triax is not as large as many of the cable operations in the United States, its
principals have significant experience in the industry. The Triax organization appears to be
staffed from top to bottom with technical expertise in the cable industry.
•
• MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Patze I1
The Merged Entity has replied to the Franchise Authorities' Request for Additional
Information by stating that it will comply with all FCC technical standards and will comply with
all current franchise requirements regarding the technology of the cable system.
Based on our review of information provided, it would appear that the Franchise
Authorities could not reasonably withhold approval of the transfer based upon the technical ability
of the Merged Entity, its management and its principals.
7. FINANCIAL STABILITY.
The financial stability factor relates to whether the Merged Entity has the financial
• resources available or committed to not only acquire the system, but also whether its financial
plan, as presented, is reasonable and economically viable. In the interest of preserving financial
resources, the Authority has chosen not to engage a separate fmancial consultant to undertake a
comprehensive review of this factor. However, the financial information which was supplied has
been reviewed by this office and a cursory due diligence analysis performed.
The Authority can assume that if the Merged Entity does not have the financial resources
available to it to close the transaction, the closing will not take place. Therefore, further scrutiny
of the actual sale transaction has not been undertaken. However, of concem to the Authority is
whether the resources are available to the Merged Entity to comply with the franchise
requirements of the Authority now and in the foreseeable future. Since the review has focused
on information provided by the Merged Entity, it must be assumed that no material
• misrepresetitations of fact are present.
MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Page 12
A merger of this sort is different from the usual purchase of an entire entity by another
entity. In a purchase transaction, the new entity brings with it its own financial history and
financial situation which must be reviewed in detail regarding the new entity which will own the
franchises. In this merger, it may be assumed that the assets of the two previously existing
owners will be merged, logically presenting a situation where the sum of the parts could be
stronger than the individual parts.
This philosophy permeates the information provided by the Merged Entity as it discusses
the economies of scale and the economies of consolidation of the management structures of the
0
two current owners. Additionally, emphasis is placed on the ability of the Merged Entity to •
continue to take advantage of such things as the affiliation with TCI for the purpose of purchasing
programming at a rate not otherwise available to a relatively small cable operator.
In a merger transaction such as this, it is necessary to investigate whether funds are being
taken out of the transaction at the time of merger which could weaken the financial stability of the
Merged Entity. In other words, is profit taking underway such that the resources remaining for
the Merged Entity are considerably diminished from those available to the original two owners?
Frankly, there was some initial concern in this area.
While the assumption of all existing liabilities of DD Cable group by the partnership was
merely a transferring of liabilities that the owning companies already had (although the DD Cable
group is strengthened by the assumption of its liabilities and Triax is weakened by such
assumption), this assumption of liabilities does not appear to significantly weaken the Merged •
• MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Paee 13
Entity. The payment of $4,200,000 out -0f -- pocket costs associated with the merger to DD Cable
Partners does appear to be excessive and is not significantly documented in the materials provided
to us. However, it does not appear to rise to the level of a problem sufficient to withhold
approval of the transfer.
The partnership is to obtain $375,000,000 of senior debt financing commitments for the
transaction to go forward and is to retire the existing bank obligations and redeem the current
limited partnership interest in the amount of $44,500,000. These monies are characterized as
sufficiently financed in the transaction and leaving money available for the Merged Entity to
• proceed with existing and future capital commitments to the systems. Since the Merged Entity
agrees to comply with all existing franchise requirements, all those Authorities with existing
capital commitments should seek compliance with those requirements. However, no specifics
were given as to the distribution of the retraining monies, and those areas in renewal and seeking
future capital upgrades will be in competition for the remaining funds available.
Additionally, monies are being paid by the partnership at closing to other entities. Almost
$2,000,000 in fees are being paid to various entities for closing fees and out -of- pocket costs. This
is not significant given the magnitude of this transaction.
Notice is again taken of the monthly fee of $275,000 to Triax as a management fee. The
Authority will need to monitor future developments in the system to be assured that the skimming
off of this money does not significantly impact the Merged Entity's ability to comply with existing
0 franchise requirements and to make the necessary commitments for future improvement of the
MEMORANDUM •
July 31, 1996
Page 14
systems. It should be noted that technological improvement of the systems are in the best interest
of the Merged Entity, and a number of the answers to our future inquiries indicate that they are
interested in such enhanced technological advancement of the systems. Therefore, the Authorities
must simply remain diligent to ensure that the systems keep pace with necessary technological
advancements, as promised by the Merged Entity.
Based upon our review of the information provided, it would appear that the Authority
could not unreasonably withhold approval of the transfer based on the financial stability of the
Merged Entity or its principals, provided that the Merged Entity agrees to comply with all local
franchise requirements, as it has done. •
8. OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS.
Other appropriate factors which have been reviewed for the purpose of determining
Whether to approve or deny this merger are contained in the information received for our review.
The most significant factor to be considered is whether the franchise will remain intact and
whether the Merged Entity will agree to comply with all existing franchise requirements promises
and representations of its predecessors.
With respect to the franchise requirements, the Merged Entity has indicated that it will
comply with all existing franchise requirements and obligations.
The Merged Entity has not proposed any modifications to the channel capacity or system
design. The Merged Entity has indicated in its responses that it intends to conduct a complete
review of all systems toward the possibility of technological upgrade and, where feasible, •
• MEMORANDUM
July 3l, 1996
Page 15
interconnection. After that review is completed, if franchise modifications are required. the
Merged Entity indicates that it will work with individual Franchise Authorities to accomplish
mutually acceptable goals.
The Merged Entity has also indicated that its review of the existing systems may involve
consolidation of local management structures as well as local offices. Those Authorities which
require local offices in their franchises should be vigilant in their position that closing a local
office would require the approval of the local Franchise Authority. The Merged Entity has
indicated that it would seek any approvals otherwise required by franchises, but often the battle
• is whether the franchise in fact requires such an approval. Any Authority with the requirement
for a local office should maintain the position that closing such a local office would require the
approval of the Authority.
The Merged Entity has indicated that it will comply with FCC technical specifications
regarding the location and length of subscriber drops. The Merged Entity will seek to
accommodate each subscriber's request for the location of drops and will restore property
damaged during an installation.
The Merged Entity has agreed to comply with all undergound installation policies as such
are established in existing franchises. If an Authority's franchise does not refer to underground
drops but does require compliance with local ordinances, and local ordinances require
underground construction, those ordinances should be enforced by the Authority.
0
MEMORANDUM •
July 31, 1996
Page 16
The Merged Entity will maintain normal business hours for the purpose of receiving
customer complaints. The customer service line will refer callers to a second number after normal
business hours which is answered by a person 24 hours a day, 365 days per year.
The Merged Entity has agreed to work with each community to meet its needs regarding
public education, government access and will continue current channel designations for public
education and government access channels unless a mutual agreement is reached with the affected
community or unless such a move is otherwise permitted by state or federal law.
Those systems which previously were owned and operated by DD Cable will be converted
to a new billing system, Cable Data. Cable Data is the largest cable billing service in the country.
The change will not affect billing policies.
The Merged Entity has indicated that franchise renewal negotiations will still be conducted
by the system manager responsible for the Authority, assisted by local legal counsel. All system
managers will report directly to Mr. Ric Hanson, who reports directly to Mr. NM Bambrough.
A final point of contention is in the payment of all fees incurred by the Authorities for the
purpose of this approval process. This office has opined that the parties requesting your approval
of this transaction are responsible for the payment of reasonable fees incurred in the Authorities'
review of this merger. Legal counsel for the parties requesting your approval has indicated that
no such obligation to pay such fees exists, however, fees would be reimbursed with the
qualification that the company reserves the right to withhold such fees from future franchise fee
payments or take other action. We have opined and communicated to you in previous •
I
• MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1996
Pase 17
correspondence that such withholding of franchise fees is inconsistent with federal, state and local
law, and would be unacceptable. Therefore, the proposed Resolution provides for the franchise
Authority approving the merger subject to the payment of all reasonable fees by the parties
requesting your approval. Should the payment of such fees not occur prior to closing, your
approval shall not be effective and your action shall be deemed a denial.
9. CONCLUSION.
As a result of the above analysis, and subject to the contingencies of the attached
Resolution and Waiver, there does not appear to be any reasonable basis for the Authority to deny
0 the request for approval of the merger.
TDC /rs
n
LJ
EXHIBIT 1
Intermedia Partners
II, LP
(CA Ltd. partnership)
General
Partner
DD Cable Partners, LP
(CA Ltd. partnership)
100% Ownership
9 Subsidiaries
Operating
Cable Systems
Intermedia Capital
Management II. LP
(CA Ltd. partnership)
General
Partner
LEO HINDERY, JR.
General
Partner
is
A
EXHIBIT 2
t • . t t . • t • WINTRaTMe t
JAMES OUSCH JAMES DeSORRENTO
Majority
Shareholders
Triax Communications Corporation
Triax Associates IV, Inc.
0 I Triax Cable General Partner, L.P.
Triax Midwest Associates, L.P.
Cable Systems
n
U
General Partner
General Partner
Parent
Corporation
W:
Clwnership/Coutrol Following Triax/DD . Mcrw
VS&A Communications
Partners II, LP
Equity Linked
Investors II
DLI Investment
Partners, LP
Unidentified
Limited Partners
DD Cable
Partners, LP
Limited
Partners
Triax C.
Partner,
JAY BUSCH JAMES DeSORRENTO
Members
Triax Telecommunications Company LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company
Member
0
Triax Midwest, LLC, a Delaware •
limited liability company
General Partner
ible General
LP
Nonmanaging
General Partner
Triax Midwest General Partners, LP,
a Delaware limited partnership
Managing
General Partner
Triax Midwest Associates, L.P.
Cable Systems
0
rIL
•
DATE: August 8, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson, City Council Members, and
City Administrator - Gary Plotz
FROM: Dick Lennes - HCDC Executive Director
RE: Airport Improvement Project
For the past several months the HCDC Transportation Team and the Airport Commission have been
working together to develop a recommendation for the City Council on Phase II of the Airport
Improvement Project.
At the Council meeting of Tuesday, August 13th a presentation will be made by this team recom-
mending the immediate implementation of the Phase II engineering work that must be done in order
to get Hutchinson positioned on the State and Federal calendar for future airport project funding.
The team has done a great deal of work in pulling together this recommendation. It is felt by the
transportation team and the HCDC Board of Directors that this project can not wait any longer. For
the benefit of the community and to promote economic development it is felt that this project be
given immediate attention.
6-
•
M
Cttll Ot
77 a
M E M O R A N D U M
August 8, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
Dolf Moon, Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Education
Hazel Sitz, Transit Coordinator
RE: Presentation by SRI Consulting of the Light Traffic Plan for the
Hutchinson Project
Charleen Zimmer of SRF Consulting will be presenting the completed Light Traffic
Plan with the staff. This is a detailed report covering pedestrian, in -line skates,
bicycles and transit. The presentation should take 45 -60 minutes. The final report
will be handed out at the meeting.
We are extremely impressed with the detail and scope of the report. The report was
completed through a grant from Mn/DOT, with the City providing in -kind services.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
City Center
III Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522
(320) 587 -5151
Far (320) 234 -4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, IIN 55350.3097
(320) 587.2975
Fax (3 20) 134 -4140
Printed on rec sled Paper -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SR'
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2414
(310) 587.2142
Y
Fax (320) 587 -6427
•
IQ: John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering
FROM: Doug Meier, Maintenance Operations Supervisor
SUBJECT: Recommendation for the Purchase of (2) two Grounds and Sidewalk Maintenance
Machines.
On July 9th and 16th, 1996, the City of Hutchinson advertised for (2) two new grounds and
sidewalk maintenance machines with attachments. Bids were publicly opened on the 31 st of July
1996, at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The results of that bid opening are as follows.
Carlson Tractor and Equipment Co.
• P.O. Boa 69
Rosemount, MN 55068
Total Bid Price for (2) two new Grounds Maintenance Machines
with attachments per specifications $ 39,495.00
Less trade -in allowance for (2) two 1989 Toro machines with
attachments (cab, mowing decks, snow blower, and hyd. broom). $ 11,000.00
Total Net Bid S 28,495.00 + tax
MT1 Distributing Company
14900 21st Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55447
Total Bid Price for (2) two new Grounds Maintenance Machines
with attachments per specifications $ 37,946.20
Less trade -in allowance for (2) two 1989 Toro Machines with
attachments (cab, mowing decks, snow blower, and hyd. broom). $ 12,000.00
----------------------------
Total Net Bid $ 25,946.20 + tax
Cit}' Center Parks & Recreation Police Sen ices
I II Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SIt'
Hutchinson, M,N 55950 -2522 Hutchinson, M.N 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, WN 55350 -'464
(612) 587 -5151 (612) 587 -2975 (612) 587 -J242
Fax(612)234 -4240 Far(612)234 -4240 1 Fax (611) W -6427
- P -;iced nn ren rled paper-
L & P Supply
1470 South Grade Road No Bid
Hutchinson, MN 55350
My recommendation is to award the contract to MTI Distributing Company to deliver (2) two
new Toro Grounds Maintenance Machines to the City of Hutchinson equipped per Specification
Publication No. 4931, for a total net bid price of $ 25,946.20 plus tax, MTI was the low bidder
by $ 2,548.80.
The units requested for replacement have between 4200 and 4500 hours of operation, which far
exceeds the recommended replacement schedule of around 3000 hours.
The units were budgeted for replacement in 1996.
11
•
•
M E M O R A N D U M
August 8, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
Steve Madson, Police Chief
RE: Consideration of Closing Arch Street Between High Street and the
Residential Area to the SE During BlufVAdams Street Construction
We are requesting that Arch Street be closed during construction of the Bluff Street
• Bridge to prevent the expected increase of detouring traffic from utilizing a gravel,
low maintenance road. We always receive complaints in this area about dust and
high speed traffic, both of which would significantly increase when Bluff Street is
closed. This is not an appropriate route for detouring traffic.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
City Center
III Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson,SLk 55350 -1512
(320) 587.5151
Far(320)234 -4140
Parks 8 Recreation
900 Harrington .Street S IV'
Hutchinson, IIN 55350.3097
(320) 587.2975
Fax(320)234 -4240
Printed on re, veled paper -
Police Services
10 Franklin Street Si:
Hulchinson, .VIN 55350 -2454
(320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 587 -6417
M E M O R A N D U M
August 8, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: REPORT OF IMPROVEMENT
Letting No. I/Project No. 97 -01, 97 -02, 97 -03 and 97-04
Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report on Improvement
Resolution Receiving Report and Waiving Hearing
Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans
Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids
Due to my secretary's vacation, the actual Resolutions will be presented on Tuesday night. We are
proposing to complete 4 small projects yet this year. These projects include the following:
• Project No. 97 -01 Pleasant Acres (North High Drivel
This improvement is for sanitary sewer extensions to serve the proposed Pleasant Acres Apartment
Complex. 100% of the costs are to be assessed. These apartments are proposed to be constructed
this year. This project was petitioned.
Project No. 97 -02 South Grade Road Street Improvements
This improvement includes constructing new curb and gutter and shoulder paving on South Grade
Road immediately east of Otter Lake on the south side of the road. 100% of the construction cost
is being assessed. The City share includes a credit for the expenses due to previous street
assessments. This project was petitioned.
Project No, 97 -03 Ontario Street Watermain Improvements
This was originally part of a project that was dropped earlier this year. It covers reconstruction of
watermain near Tartan Park and the old Park Garage. This work is required prior to construction of
5th Avenue SE. The sanitary sewer work that was previously proposed will be completed in a
separate project.
Project No, 97 -04 TH 7 and School Road Improvements
This project includes several safety improvements at the intersection of TH 7 and School Road. It
includes removing the frontage road west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance unto TH
• 7 and sidewalk and crossing improvements.
City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street S W
Hutchinson,,tLti 55350 -2522 Hutchinson,A 55350.3097 Hutchinson, SLV 55350.2464
(320) 587.5151 (320) 587.2975 (320) 587.2242
Fax (320) 234 -4240 Fax (320) 2344240 � � Fax (320) 587 -6427
�� i
- Printed on recycled paper -
We recommend approval of the project. Because the construction estimate is less than $100,000 we
will be able to bid the project sooner. We will be back at the next Council meeting to approve the
projects.
CC. Gary Plotz - City Administrator
Cal Rice - Engineering Supervisor
file: 97/L 1
•
C -1
PROJECT
COST BR AKDOW
•
PROJECT
COST
EXPENSES
TQTA ASSESSED
CITY SHARE
97 -01
$39,000
$9,400
$489400 $48,400
NA
97 -02
$13,600
$3,400
$17,000 $13,600
$ 3,400
97 -03
$27,000
$6,500
$33,500
$33,500
97 -04
$12,400
$3,000
$15,400
$15,400
TOTAL
$92,000
$22,300
$114,300 $62,000
$62,300
We recommend approval of the project. Because the construction estimate is less than $100,000 we
will be able to bid the project sooner. We will be back at the next Council meeting to approve the
projects.
CC. Gary Plotz - City Administrator
Cal Rice - Engineering Supervisor
file: 97/L 1
•
C -1
•
•
UTCH/NSON ENG/NEER/NG/PUBL& WORKS DEPARTMENT
Hutchinson City Center / I I I Hassan Street SE / Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2522 / Phone (612) 234-4209 / FAX (612) 234 -4240
ENGINEERINGREPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Letting No. 1/Project No. 97 -01
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be
constructed.
Project No. 97 -01 North High Drive extension of watermain, water services, sanitary sewer, sewer services,
restoration and appurtenances to serve Pleasant Acres apartment complex; and
TOTAL
Construction Cost $ 39,000.00
Engineering/Administraton $ 6,240.00
FiscaVLegaVlnterest $ 3,120.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
S 48.360.00
Assessable Cost
$ 48,360.00
Deferred Assessable Cost
$ 0,00
City Bonded
$ 0,00
City Other Funds
$ 0.00
MSA
$ 0.00
Mn/DOT
$ 0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
S48,360.00
ce: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
file: Ll/97 -01, 97 -02, 97 -03, 97 -04
/N -
Hutchinson City Center/ I I I Hassan Street SE /Hutch in son, Minnesota 55350 -2522 /Phone (612) 234 -4209 /FAX (612) 234 -4240
0 ENGINEERING]REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Letting No. 1/Project No. 97 -02
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be
constructed.
Project No. 97 -02 South side of South Grade Road east of Otter Lake by construction of concrete
curb and gutter, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
appurtenances; and
TOTAL
Construction Cost S13,600.00
• Engineering/Administraton S 2,176.00
Fiscal/Legal/Interest S 1,088.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
5 16.864.00
Assessable Cost
$ 13,491.00
Deferred Assessable Cost
S 000
City Bonded
S 3,373.00
City Other Funds
$ 0.00
MSA
$ 0.00
Mn /DOT
$ 0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Deparunent
file: Ll/97 -0I, 97 -02, 97 -03, 97-04
Hutchinson City Center/ III Hassan Street SE /Hutch in son, Minnesota 55350 -2522 /Phone (612)134 -4209 / FAX (612) 2344240
ENGINEERINGREPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Letting No. 1/Project No. 97 -03
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be
constructed.
Project No. 97 -03
Ontario Street near Tartan Park and old Park Garage by reconstruction of
watermain, bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances; and
Construction Cost
TOTAL
$ 27,000.00
• Engineering/Administraton S 4,320.00
FiscaVLegaVInterest
$ 2,160 00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
S33,480.00
Assessable Cost
$ 000
Deferred Assessable Cost $ 000
City Bonded
$ 33,480.00
City Other Funds
$ 0.00
MSA
$ 0.00
Mn/DOT
$ 0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
S 33.480.00
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
file: L 1/97 -01, 97 -02. 97 -03, 97 -04
•
0
•
is
Hutchinson City Center / I I I Hassan Street SE / Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2522 / Phone (612) 234 -4209 / FAX (612) 234 -4240
ENGINEERING]REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 13, 1996
SUBJECT: Letting No. I/Project No. 97 -04
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed project is feasible and recommend it be
constructed.
Project No. 97 -04 Hwy 7 and School Road safety improvements to include removal of frontage
road west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance onto Hwy 7 and
sidewalk and crossing improvements by construction of storm sewer, concrete
curb and gutter, sidewalk, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration
and appurtenances.
Construction Cost
Engineering/Adm inistraton
Fi sca l/LegaUlnterest
ESTIMATED TOTAL
Assessable Cost
Deferred Assessable Cost
City Bonded
City Other Funds
MSA
Mn/DOT
ESTIMATED TOTAL
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
file: L1/97 -01, 97 -02, 97- 03.97-04
$12,400.00
S 1,984.00
S 992.00
S 0.00
S 0.00
$15,376.00
S 0.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
/° I
• RESOLUTION NO. 10725
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 97-01, 97 -02, 97 -03 and 97 -04
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve:
Project No. 97 -01 North High Drive extension of watermain, water services, sanitary sewer, sewer
services, restoration and appurtenances to serve Pleasant Acres apartment complex;
and
Project No. 97 -02 South side of South Grade Road east of Otter Lake by construction of concrete curb
and gutter, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 97-03 Ontario Street near Tartan Park and old Park Garage by reconstruction of watermain,
bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -04 Hwy 7 and School Road safety improvements to include removal of frontage road
west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance onto Hwy 7 and sidewalk and
crossing improvements by construction of storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances;
• WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is
instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether
the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with
some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
•
Mayor
• RESOLUTION NO. 10726
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 97.01, 97 -02, 97 -03 & 97 -04
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted August 13th, 1996, a report has been prepared
by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of :
Project No. 97 -01 North High Drive extension of watermain, water services, sanitary sewer, sewer
services, restoration and appurtenances to serve Pleasant Acres apartment complex;
and
Project No. 97 -02 South side of South Grade Road east of Otter Lake by construction of concrete curb
and gutter, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -03 Ontario Street near Tartan Park and old Park Garage by reconstruction of
watermain, bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -04 Hwy 7 and School Road safety improvements to include removal of frontage road
west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance onto Hwy 7 and sidewalk and
crossing improvements by construction of storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
• appurtenances;
and said report was received by the Council on August 13th, 1996.
•
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the
assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $92,000.00.
2. The public hearing on the proposed improvements for Project No.s 97 -01 and 97 -02 is hereby waived,
as said improvements was petitioned for and hearing was waived by 100% of the property owners.
3. The public hearing on the proposed improvements for Project No.s 97 -03 and 97 -04 is hereby waived,
as said improvements are 100% city cost and non - assessable.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
Mayor
• RESOLUTION NO. 10727
RESOLUTION ORDERING HVIPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING NO. I
PROJECT NO. 97-01, 97 -02, 97.03 & 9 -04
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 13th day of August, 1996, waived public hearing
on the improvement of:
Project No. 97 -01 North High Drive extension of watermain, water services, sanitary sewer, sewer
services, restoration and appurtenances to serve Pleasant Acres apartment complex;
and
Project No. 97 -02 South side of South Grade Road east of Otter Lake by construction of concrete curb
and gutter, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -03 Ontario Street near Tartan Park and old Park Garage by reconstruction of watermain,
bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -04 Hwy 7 and School Road safety improvements to include removal of frontage road
west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance onto Hwy 7 and sidewalk and
• crossing improvements by construction of storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCFIINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 13th day of August, 1996.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
C�
Mayor
0 RESOLUTION NO. 10728
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 97 -01, 97 -02, 97 -03 & 97 -04
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of:
Project No. 97 -01 North High Drive extension of watermain, water services, sanitary sewer, sewer
services, restoration and appurtenances to serve Pleasant Acres apartment complex;
and
Project No. 97 -02 South side of South Grade Road east of Otter Lake by construction of concrete curb
and gutter, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -03 Ontario Street near Tartan Park and old Park Garage by reconstruction of
watermain, bituminous surfacing, restoration and appurtenances; and
Project No. 97 -04 Hwy 7 and School Road safety improvements to include removal of frontage road
west of School Road, reconstructing a park entrance onto Hwy 7 and sidewalk and
crossing improvements by construction of storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter,
sidewalk, grading, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, restoration and
0 appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby
approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
publicly opened at 2:00 pm on Monday, August 26th, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center
by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the
Council on August 27th, 1996, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to
address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the
Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to
the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
City Administrator
Mayor
0
c
M E M O R A N D U M
August 8, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Approving Huski Addition Subdivision Agreement
Attached please find a copy of the proposed Subdivision Agreement for Huski
Addition. This Agreement is slightly different than usual because the Developer is
completing the improvements, and no City financing is being used. We are however,
• charging the Developer for Engineering Services and have an agreement for Park
contributions.
We recommend approval.
cc: Gary Plotz - City Administrator
City Center
Ill Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson. NIN 55350 -2522
(320) 587 -5151
Fax (320) 234.4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street S I$
Hutchinson, MN 55350.3097
(320) 587 -2975
Fax (320) 2344240
Printed on recycled paper -
Police Seri-ices
10 Franklin Street S«
Hutchinson. SIN 55350 -2464
(320) 587.2242
��� �� Fax (320) 587 -6427
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
"Huski Addition"
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth hereinafter, by and
between Sand Properties, Minnesota Inc., a Minnesota corporation, owner, hereinafter called the
"Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal Corporation in the County of McLeod, State
of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of property situated in the County
of McLeod, State of Minnesota, which has been surveyed and platted as "Huski Addition ", and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires the Subdivider to make certain
improvements in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
I SITE PREPARATION ND GRADING
1. It is agreed and understood that the Subdivider shall be responsible for all work associated •
with site preparation and grading. All areas within the final plat, but outside of the rights -of-
way, shall be graded to within 0.5 feet of final grade to allow for proper drainage, and the
installation of utilities. The entire right -of -way shall be graded to within 0.2 feet of final
subgrade, as noted in the approved improvement plans for the project. Any and all unstable
soil conditions or soils unsuitable for construction in the right -of -way shall be corrected
and/or replaced. The Subdivider shall clear trees and/or debris from utility easements and
rights -of -way, as per the request of the City or utility, prior to installation of the
improvements. All soils shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density.
All work shall conform with the approved Site Grading Plan, and shall be completed prior
to the commencement of construction on the site. On -site ponding shall be constructed as
noted in the revised grading plan, including minimum slopes of 10:1 for 1 verticle foot on
either side of the ordinary high water elevation.
2. It shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to assure that the Site Grading Plan is being
conformed to during building construction within the plat. This responsibility shall include
the notification of contractors and builders as to the drainage and grading requirements,
lowest floor elevation requirements.
Huski Addition /August 8,1996/Page I
L�
•
3. It is agreed and understood that natural gas or electric distribution mains and services will
not be scheduled for installation until all utility and street construction has been completed
in the plat, and all provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this section have been met.
II. IMPROVEMENTS & ASSESSMENTS
The Subdivider hereby agrees to construct storm sewer and appurtenances, sanitary sewer
mains and appurtenances, sanitary sewer service leads, water-mains, water service leads,
concrete curb and gutter, street grading, aggregate base and bituminous street surfacing to
serve the entire plat.
2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider must have all plans and specifications for the
improvements approved by the City. It is understood that all work shall conform to City
Standards, as provided in the standard City Specifications. It is understood that the
Contractor agrees to contract all improvement construction services and pay all construction
costs for said improvements in Paragraph No. 1.
3. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay to the City a fee for plan and
specification review, on -site construction review and field staking services. This lump sum
fee shall not exceed $13,000. It is understood that all surveying required for ground control,
including staking of property comers and curve points, shall be completed by the Subdivider.
• 4. It is understood and agreed that sidewalk and bicycle trail improvements will be required to
be constructed through the site, at the Subdividers cost, when development occurs north of
Texas Avenue NW. A minimum of a 5' wide concrete sidewalk and 10' wide bike trail, or
a 13' combined trail, shall be constructed. If an on- street bicycle path can be designed, based
on City standards, the Subdivider shall only be required to construct the sidewalk
improvements. It is understood that the City will construct connecting improvements, as part
of the comprehensive plan, in coordination with the proposed improvements.
0. 01,41.ILOI MCI DMIZI I U 3111190 1 COM
It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall not be required to pay a municipal
electric service access charge, since the property is located within the original municipal
electric service boundary.
2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall, prior to installation of utilities, pay
connection fees for Electric and Gas Service to Hutchinson Utilities for all lots to be served
in the final plat. These costs for standard single - family house services for 1995 are $150 for
Electric Service, and $150 for Gas Service. These fees include the standard connection to
each house, and include required meters. Services larger than the standard residential sizes
will be at an additional cost. Fees for multi - family units shall be as determined by
• Hutchinson Utilities.
Huski Addrtion/August 8,1996/Page 2
3. It is understood and agreed, that a Parks and Playground Contribution shall be paid to the •
City prior to issuance of any Building Permits. For development of Block 2/1-ot 1 the
Subdivider will pay the full $135 per unit ($4.320.00) at the time of the building permit.
They will also be required to provide $4,000.00 worth of play equipment on site (tot lot).
If the Subdivider's costs exceed the $4,000.00, receipt must be provided so the City can
credit them the difference from the initial cash contribution. In any event the credit will not
exceed the cash contribution. This formula has been approved by the PRCE Board.
4. Block 1/Lot 1 shall pay an amount to be determined based on City policy at the time of
building construction. Additional consideration of parks and playgrounds facilities for Block
1 will be reviewed when development plans are submitted to the City.
IV. GENERAL
1. It is understood and agreed that no building permits will be issued for building construction
prior to the utility and street improvement project completion, unless the Subdivider provides
a separate access to the building site that does not interfere with utility and street
construction. Any damage that occurs to areas within the improvement project due to
building construction shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to correct.
2. It is understood and agreed that all local, state and federal permits required to be obtained
for the development shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider. •
3. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and
successors of the parties.
4. It is understood and agreed that the City shall record this agreement at the McLeod County
Recorder's Office or McLeod County Registrar of Titles Office, and that no Building Permits
will be issued until said Agreement is recorded and a certified copy of this agreement is
provided to the City. All costs associated with said recording shall be paid by the
Subdivider.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, has hereunto set its hand this _ day of
,19_
•
Huski Addition/August 8, ft/Page 3
• FEE OWNER:
Leo M. Sand, Chief Executive Officer
Sand Properties, Minnesota Inc.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this_
day of 19, by Leo M. Sand, Chief
Executive Officer of Sand Properties, Minnesota Inc., a
Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public,
My Commission Expires
APPROVED BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL THE
19_.
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MARLIN TORGERSON, MAYOR
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
John P. Rodeberg, PE
Director of Engineering(Public Works
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320 - 234 -4208
•
County, Minnesota
DAY OF
GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 19_, by Marlin
Torgerson, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator of the
City of Hutchinson.
Notary Public,
My Commission Expires
Huski Addition/August 8,1996/Page 4
County, Minnesota
G:'S( BAGRE'E1H(15K2ADD - AUgun 8.1996
��NNESpTq
vo Z�
• n a
n F
� p
F1,T 5Q
OF TFPa
August 2, 1996
Minnesota
Dc1mr1mcm of Transl()rlafion
BOX Ise
2505 TRANSPORTATION ROAD
WILLMAR. MINNESOTA 56201
Mr. John Rodeberg, City Engineer
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Dear John:
C
AUG 8 1996
Mn/DOT has set -aside 1997 consultant budget dollars to conduct transportation planning studies
in cities > 5,000 population, which includes the City of Hutchinson. The purpose of this letter is
to outline a preliminary scope of work, timeline and funding proposal for a joint study between
Mn/DOT, McLeod County and the City of Hutchinson.
Over the past several years, significant changes have occurred within and immediatel adjacent to
the city limits. In addition to multiple new housing areas, numerous other major tr2c generators
have occurred or are in various stages of development -- including our new HATS facility. I think
you will agree that Hutchinson's growth has accelerated the need for a 20 year Comprehensive
• Transportation Plan. That is why Mn/DOT is proposing to enter into a cooperative planning
partnership with McLeod County and the City of Hutchinson to provide technical and financial
support (see attached proposal).
At this time, we are asking Hutchinson City Officials to indicate their support for this proposal by
signing the attached "Resolution of Support" and return to this office by SeDtember 1. 1996
Please note that the Resolution is a nonbinding document that merely states the intentions of the
three parties to enter into an agreement. Upon favorable action by the City and County, Mn/DOT
Will initiate next steps, which would include the drafting of a formal Cooperative Agreement
requiring execution by the City of Hutchinson at a later date. If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact Cheryl Plathe, Transportation Planner, at 320/231 -5497.
Sincerely,
moo,.. .1.�..- e.a...
David G. Trooien
Transportation District Engineer
Attachments: Resolution of Support and Proposal
Copies:
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Donn Wmckler, Mid-Minnesota RDC
Nelrae Succio, Assistant District Engineer
• Tom Behm, District State Aid Engineer
Cheryl Plathe, District Transportation Planner
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Resolution of Support"
(1997 Hutchinson Area Transportation Planning Study)
WHEREAS: The City of Hutchinson wishes to enter into a partnership with The Minnesota
Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) and McLeod County to retain the services of a
professional consultant to perform a Hutchinson Area Transportation and Planning Study which
will result in the development of a 20 year transportation plan to address anticipated growth in the
area; and
WHEREAS: Said consultant study will be guided and directed by a Technical Advisory Team,
which shall include technical expertise in the areas of transportation planning and engineering; and
WHEREAS: Said Technical Assistance Team shall include two (2) representatives from the City
of Hutchinson; and
WHEREAS: The cost of the study will be limited to 575,000; and
WHEREAS: Mn/DOT is willing to fund 80% of the study's cost; the balance to be shared equally
by the City of Hutchinson and McLeod County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Hutchinson supports said study and
instructs Mn/DOT to assume responsibility for overall project management, which will include the
drafting of a Cooperative Agreement between Mn /DOT, McLeod County, and the City of
Hutchinson.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council on this _ day of 1996. •
Attest:
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor City Clerk
•
r
• "Proposed"
•
Hutchinson Area
Transportation Planning Study
A cooperative planning effort between:
r"
McLeod County
City of Hutchinson
Mid - Minnesota Regional Development Commission
• August 2, 1996
/, T
Hutchinson Area Transportation Planning Study •
Introduction•
Hutchinson is located in central Minnesota: 60 miles westerly from Minneapolis/St. Paul and sits
approximately in the center of a triangle formed by the regional centers of St. Cloud, Willmar and
Mankato. Although Glencoe is the county seat for McLeod County, Hutchinson is actually the
county's primary city.
Classified as a "Significant Regional Center" on the Market Artery System, Hutchinson is rated as
a `complete shopping center" by CURA. Major employers include Hutchinson Technology
(computer parts) with 4,600 employees, 3M (scotch/magnetic tapes) with 2,200 employees, and
Hutchinson Community Hospital with a workforce of 300. Hutchinson has 30 acres currently •
available for industrial development: Hutchinson Industrial Park with 20 acres available and
Airport Addition with 10 acres. City staff have been updating their Comp Plan, which includes
five elements: Sanitary Sewer System Expansion, Surface Water/Drainage Improvements, Park
and Recreation Open Space System, Land Use, and Street System Plans (see attachments).
McLeod County and the City of Hutchinson have experienced population growth of 15.8% and
43.5 %, respectively for the period 1970 -1990. The 1990 census shows Hutchinson with a
population of 11,523 and as a city of> 5,000 population, Hutchinson receives an annual state aid
construction allotment of approximately $300,000. McLeod County receives an annual state aid
allocation of approximately $1.2 million for regular and municipal construction.
Page 1 •
• State highways 7, 15 and 22 converge in Hutchinson: All carry a year-round 10 ton designation.
All of Highway 22 as well as Highway 7 west of Hutchinson are functionally classified as "Minor
Arterials" whereas Highway 15 north/south and 7 east of Hutchinson are "Principal Arterials ".
(Refer to map for additional Minor Arterials and Major Collectors on local system.)
Public Transportation services include the city- managed "Hutchmobile ", offering dial -a -ride and
route deviation with 3 small buses. Currently, Hutchinson is not served by an Intrastate Regular
Route Passenger Bus Authority.
Hutchinson has formed a Light Traffic Task Force (LTTF) to oversee the development of a
citywide bicycle/pedestrian/transit plan. SRF consulting firm was retained to provide
• recommendations to the LTTF and recently submitted 8 draft "Technical Memos", including a
•
"Short Term Implementation Action Plan ". Also, a McLeod County Trails Group has developed
a Master Plan, creating a countywide trail system. A 1995 ISTEA Enhancement project upgraded
3.5 miles of the Luce Line Trail running east/west through Hutchinson; additional Luce Line Trail
improvements have been approved for ISTEA funding in 1997 -98 between Hutchinson and Cedar
Mills (to the west) and Hutchinson and Winged (to the east).
Hutchinson is saved by Dakota Rail Inc. with 44 miles of piggy -back service. Hutchinson also
has a 3,200' paved runway with charter service available.
Page 2
Purpose and Scope of Work •
Purpose of Study; To conduct a 20 -year transportation planning study which will result in
orderly growth and development within the City of Hutchinson. The study shall include three
components: Needs Assessment, Alternative Analysis, and Implementation Plan.
Needs Assessment: The needs assessment will include a review and analysis of city
comprehensive plans, identify major transportation corridors within or immediately adjacent to the
city (existing and proposed) regardless of jurisdiction, and develop 2015 traffic forecasts at a
segment and intersection level. Examples of data to be studied include:
• Census Bureau Demographic and other Socio-Economic Data
' Traffic Volumes
• Accident Statistics
• Capital Improvement Plans
' Zoning and Land Use Plans
• Airport Master Plan
' Rail/Grade Crossing Improvement Plan
' Bike/Pedestrian Plan
' Infrastructure Plans (Street System, Sanitary Sewer System, Surface Water, Electrical/Lighting)
Alternative A ffb3th To develop and evaluate a range of alternatives to address existing and
future transportation system needs.
' Capacity and /or safety alternatives could include a bypass around the city, additional lanes, turn •
lanes, passing lanes, roadway widening, interchanges and signals
• Corridor preservation techniques and applications could include early acquisition of right -of-
way, regulatory controls under local police power, and voluntary cooperation by land owners
' Policy -level alternatives could include highway jurisdiction and functional classification changes
System Plan Development To develop a cooperative investment plan for implementing projects
in a timely and orderly manner
' Listed in priority order based on need
' Immediate (0-5 years), medium (5 -10 years) and long -range (10-20 year)
' Action steps for all levels of government (city, township, county and state)
' Based on criteria established by the Technical Advisory Team, including but not limited to:
Funding availability, need, com ty and regional support, and deliverability (i.e. realistic project
development timelines)
Page 3 0
• "Roles and Resnonsibilities"
Mn/DOT
1. Financial commitment of up to $60,000
2. Provide a Project Manager who shall (with Technical Advisory Team input and involvement)
' Prepare and Issue a Request for Qualifications/Interest (RFQ/1)
• Administer the Consultant Interview /Selection Process
• Administer the Consultant Contract
• Act as liaison between the consultant and the Technical Advisory Team
' Provide staff to the Technical Advisory Team (agenda, minutes, meeting
logistics, coordinate public involvement activities)
3. Appoint 1 representative to serve on the Technical Advisory Team (recommend District
Traffic Engineer or District State Aid Engineer)
City of Hutchinson
1. Financial commitment of up to $7,500
2. Appoint 2 representatives to serve on the Technical Advisory Team (recommend City
Administrator, City Planner, City Engineer and/or Police Chief)
McLeod County
1. Financial commitment of up to 57,500
• 2. Appoint 1 representative to serve on the Technical Advisory Team (recommend County
Enginer).
Regional Development Commission
1. Appointment 1 representative to serve on Technical Advisory Team (recommend
Transportation Planner)
Note: The Technical Advisory Team will be responsible for
- Providing a representative to serve on the Consultant Interview /Selection Panel
— Providing data to the consultant, including but not limited to traffic data and studies,
geometrics, as -built plans, planned or programrned project data, pavement and bridge
structural inventories and analysis, zoning, ordinances and land use plans, socio-
economic data, capital improvement plans, etc.
— Providing technical expertise in transportation planning and engineering issues
-- Providing local, regional or statewide perspective on transportation plans, policies,
standards and programs
— Ongoing communication with internal and external stakeholders and customers
• Page 4
Proposed Timeline"
•
September 1, 1996
RFP Released to Qualified Consultants
October 1, 1996
Deadline for RFQ/1 responses from interested consultants
October, 1996
Consultant Selection/Approval Process
November, 1996
Contract Negotiations and Contract Preparation
December 31, 1996
Contract Approval
January-June, 1997
Contract Execution
June 30, 1997
Final Report and Contract Completion
Page 5
August 8, 1996
Mayor Marlin Torgerson
and the City Council Members
City Center
111 Hassan Street S. E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members:
Solitra U.S.A. is interested in purchasing Lot 9 in the Industrial Park, which is adjacent to Lot 8
where we are currently located. In our Lease Agreement the option to purchase Lot 9 is spelled out
at a cost of $11,213.00.
Sincerely,
• -k3 - --
Lasse Ravaska
President
Solitra U.S.A.
LR/mbs
DATE: August 7, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson, City Council Members,
City Administrator - Gary Plotz
FROM: Dick Lennes - HCDC Executive Director
RE: Solitra U.S.A. ", 5
Solitra U.S.A. has a written agreement with the City of Hutchinson that they can exercise their
option to purchase Lot 9 in Block 1, First Addition to Hutchinson Industrial District at a price of
$11,213.00.
This option according to the agreement is exercisable only in the event that Solitra purchases Lot 8
which they are currently occupying. As I understand the sale of any property by the City must have
two readings. It is requested the first reading take place on Tuesday, August 13th and the second
and final reading on Tuesday, August 27th. This gives us some time to work with the HCDC Finance
Team and with the City Attorney - Barry Anderson to work out the details on the transfer of title from
HCDC to Solitra for Lot 8 and also the necessary paperwork for the acquisition of Lot 9. ,
At the time this memo is being written, HCDC does not have a formal written request from Solitra,
however, a letter is to be delivered in time for the mailing of the agenda.
0
August 9, 1996
City o f
77 j
1.a-W��]
The audit for 1995
has been completed. Last
year the council held
a workshop with the
auditors to review the financial report for
1995. The auditors
then would summarize the
report for the council
and public at their regular meeting.
If the council would like to follow this same procedure we would
ask for a motion
to approve a workshop
preceding the regular
meeting on Tuesday
August 27.
x:d « \Z.r 1.v d
City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street S15
10 Franklin Street S {l
Elutchinson, 61.x' 55350.2522
Hutchinson, UN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, N 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -5151
Far(320)234 -4240
(320) 587 -2975
Fax(320)234 -4240
(320)587.224'
Fax (320)
t
- Printed on recycled paper -
•
C]
MEMORANDUM
August 9, 1996
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Marilyn J. Swanson, Administrative Secretary
111 iii Jill! 1111 1
143-1103901
Since the copies of the photographs provided by Earl Fitzloff did not reproduce very well on the
copy machine, the originals will be available for viewing at the workshop.
I am in the process of obtaining copies of three petitions submitted in 1989 or 1990. Therefore, they
will provided in time for the workshop. Also, Mr. Fitzloff submitted additional background
information regarding the intersection issue which dates back to 1990. It will also be copied and
handed out for the workshop.
cc: Earl Fitzloff
_C
FA0G 1 1 9)
1 "o the mayor and to the council: C •
I believe traffic can be moved safely and conveniently for
today's convenience- minded shopper without creating an obstruction
and resulting negative reaction for the driver. We in retail cannot
have disgruntled customers frustrated by difficulty getting to or
away from our business.
Please note that the following sequence of changes took place
Previous to John Rodeberg's presence and he is not responsible for
the creation of this situation. But with his experience and
knowledge I believe he can encourage a solution.
In 1971 -72 property was given for construction of the street
that passes in front of Hardware Hank. In 1988 half of the street
was closed. Required assessments for the street were paid. Letters
from the public were sent to the Leader
(attached) and a petition gained approximately 300 signatures. The
county board's reaction is also attached.
The following is an observation of traffic flow on June 9. 1995
between 7AM and 12 noon (specifically a count of cars going north on
Lynn Rd.):
43 cars by way of Pizza Hut
10 cars by way of the Health Center
54 cars by Clinton Ave. (some came by way of highway 15)
107 TOTAL CARS FROM 7 -NOON �-
This could easily translate into 200 or more cars passing in front of
the store each day. This represents the lost business we would like
to regain.
Did the council know before construction that Lynn Road would be
closed to incoming traffic from the south and west? Was the council
advised of the effect this construction would have on the three
commercial properties?
The city has paid for a study but has not received from that
study any plans that would correct the situation -- no proposal to
accept or re.ject.
I have asked councilman Don Erickson to inquire of commercial
realtors as to estimates of the amount of property value that has
been lost. I have also asked him to contact retail managers as to
what they believe the effect would be on business to lose over 200
cars from the traffic passing their front door each day.
LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION
The following information highlights the history of hardware
stores in Hutchinson and the impact that location has had on their
success:
1. OK Hardware prospered near SHOPKO with the resulting traffic it is
provided in the Plaza 15 location. When SHOPKO left so did OK
0ardware. * TRAFFIC- LOCATION
2. Coast to Coast had tough going until the relocation of SHOPKO and
More 4 into the area and now it prospers. *TRAFFIC- LOCATION
3. Farm & Horne prospered on Lynn Road before the street construction
of 1988. Bill and Jackie tried to maintain business levels by among
other things, working double time. And yet this business no longer
exists. *LOSS OF TRAFFIC
4. Hardware Hank prospered on Lynn Road before the construction of
1988. Volume dropped and the business was unable to regain more than
inflation of 3: each year and is unable to generate a profit.
In response to the decrease of sales after construction year
1988 we had a market analysis conducted. Tim Anderson of United
Hardware conducted the in- market phase. Distribution America
prepared and collected the data for demographic reports, competitive
analysis, sales analysis, in store analysis by department and space
allocation.
It was concluded that we have a viable business with good growth
Potential. Strengths lie in location, proximity to other retail
draw, and high visibility. Weaknesses included in -store lighting,
merchandising of price leaders, and INGRESS and EGRESS to the store.
• The recommendation was signing: (2'X 4' signs minimum)
1 on South Grade Road
1 or 2 on Highway 15 to identify entrance
1 or 2 on the boulevard east of Hardware Hank parking lot
directing traffic to Highway 15 N., Highway 15 S. and the
mall
when examining the plan for work underway Tim Anderson found no
improvement to aid the business and property on Lynn Road. He did
detect a possible negative effect with the lare marking that will
discourage the reverse flow of traffic through Pizza Hut which has
proved to be a positive for us in the existing situation. Note has
been made that there was no positive instructions to improve access
to Lynn Road, hence all negative reaction to feasibility.
Dan Sarf of Bolton & Menk, Inc. says it is possible to open Lynn
Road however it is riot the preferred engineering option. The
conclusion of the recommendation labeled "Alternative D" states:
"Maintain the Lynn Road access as it presently exists and
provide additional signing to guide traffic to northbound T.H. 15.
This alternative is feasible and we recommend that it be implemented
regardless of whether other alternatives are pursued."
Let us consider a plan for better access. Pictures will show it
�eing done:
1. Lakeville, MN 35W East on #50.
Thi; is looking west. at 175th 5t. and #50.
Note the strip on the right which leads to Mills Fleet Farm. •
2. This is the start_ of strip mall on service road next to #50
goes west and north to Mills Fleet Farm.
3. The west end of the strip turns north to Mills Fleet Farm.
4.&
5. Looking at westbound traffic on #50.
This traffic can turn and 175th St. can enter Super America
on a short turn.
Eastbound can also have access to Super America via 175th
St. and enter.
6. Standing in the entrance to the strip mall at 175th St.
Showing proximity to #50.
Looking at entrance to Super America.
7.&
8.&
9. All show intersection of #50 & 175th St.
Note availability of all turns: Bank, Dairy Queen, Super
America and the strip mall.
10.&
11. Hutchinson -- School -Road to Highway 22 and Highway 7 going •
west.
NoLE� 3 breaks or turns available to the west and Super
America and also to the east to Happy Chef and the service
road.
Traffic is 2 -way in all cases.
Super America came after the 1988 construction of Highway 15
South,
12.&
13. Hutchinson- -Citgo -Quick Mart
Note proximity of entrances to lot and that all are 2 -way.
There are no restrictions even from the north to turn the
corner and enter.
This was built later than the 1988 construction of Highway
15 South.
14. Hutchinson- -AMOCO Intersection of Highway 15 and Highway 7
Note availability of in and out around corner - -no
restriction on eastbound or westbound traffic.
This intersection was redesigned and marked after 1988 the
construction of Highway 15 South.
15. South Grade Road & Highway 15
2 of 4 cars turned on Clinton Avenue to reach Lynn Road.
It could have been more convenient and safe.to turn at the
south end of Lynn Road.
16.&
• 17. Intersection of South Grade Road and Highway 15
Shows space available for changes- -more adequate
space and much less traffic than samples above.
18. Farm & Home location
We miss them and wonder if the street construction of 1988
was a large factor in their demise.
19. Standing at H.W. corner of Hardware Hank
This indicates the amount of traffic from the Health Center
by LOAM after an overnight snow in March.
20. Intersection in question
It can be reworked as per pictures. Please order a plan to
consider this.
Yours truly,
Earl E. Fitt fff
P.S. I desire a discussion with full council with press but prefer
0 n video for freedom of discussion. Please arrange a time and place.
U
i%1 LAKEVILLE, MN (35W East on #50)
#2 STRIP MALL ON SERVICE ROAD NEXT TO 1150
(Goes West and North to Mills Fleet Farm)
0
•
C�
J
r
WkNQ
Lip" ww
;r
Y; I
z'1 .
r
Irm
1)
'Itt ?� -
I�� `. l
' t / .�
�� � �5'.
4. "}414 �
�_ � -•� ••rte ^ I �� �'�
we'll"
�m
4th. .
_ ai
a
j_iIIR .(A
r X 1
•f
r 0. 1 a 1 1 I I
,r .•+ r s
F iYS ! 1i ✓ ! !+" ►t�1'`/Y'� ;i r. ri Y!, i`W'j!asrr;.
r� t - •d Cy_ "�f !`i ll� ��ry rj 'r. r i�r3
t. -Wal -711rr NW-
js
lot
lid
h
av
S eJ®
u
0
0
$19 STANDING AT NW CORNER OF FARDWARE HANK
1120 INTERSECTION IN QUESTION
0
RESOLUTION NO. 10723
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering and the Police Chief agree that the
following areas have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locations as
points where traffic control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision
1 of the Hutchinson City Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control device known as a "NO
PARKING" sign shall be erected at the following location:
• On the north and south side of Trunk Highway 7/22 (4th Avenue NW) from Trunk
Highway 15 (Main Street) west to a point 500 feet west of Kouwe Street.
Adopted this 13h day of August, 1996 by the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota.
City Administrator - Gary D. Plotz
• HARESOLUTTRAFFICITRAFC016RES
Mayor - Marlin Torgerson
/o -14 ,
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996, 11:55 AM
page
-- - - -- -
1980 TIDS
c *>
'---'------------------
COUNTY TREASURER
'-- "-X-IN - -'--'--"- '-- ----
SET-UP TAX INC #9 /CERTIFIED
---- -' -- '-- ----- --
$100.00
$100.00*
084 PARKING BDS JUUL CONTRACTING CO
< *>
ESTIMATE #2 -JULY 1996
$89,330.40
$89,330.40*
1995 IMPRO
CONST BOLTON F MENK INC.
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
PROFESS SERV- HAYDEN, OSGOOD
$1,803.34
EST #8
$3,694.20
$5,497.54*
1996 IMPRO
CONST BOLTON & MENK INC.
JUUL
PROFESS SERV -S GRADE ROAD
8.08
$67$678.16
CONTRACTING CO
EST #4
OSM
WM MUELLER � SONS
PROFESS SERV -LUCE LINE
$3
$22,144.93
< *>
EST 41
,$15,285.50
$41,236.67*
CAP.IMPRO.FUND
LOGIS
PHIL G PAINTING
WIRING, NETWORK
$14,051.39
*>
CLEAN, PRIME 6 PAINT TRUSSES
12,300.00
26,351.39*
B<
CENTRAL GARAGE BRANDON TIRE CO
CARQUEST
VALVE STEM, INSTALL
$1,279.48
AUTO PARTS
DISC PADS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AUG MED
$811.51
COAST TO COAST
EMED COMPANY
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS
$432.09
$1.11
FORTIS BENEFITS
LOCK -OUT KIT AUG LTD
$94.86
G 6 R SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$19.63
GEMPLER'S INC
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
LOCK -OUT TAGS, PLUG LOCK -OUTS
55.78
41.30
INK SPOTS
AIR FILTER, CIR TEST
$.14
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
PAPER - OPERATORS DAILY REPORT
RUBBER DIRT
$89
$89.90
MN BODY 6 EQUIPMENT
DEFLECTOR
INTERLOCK MODULE
363.54
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
LOCK -OUT KIT
106.50
MN MUTUAL LIFE
AUG LIFE
8.22
MTI DIST.CO
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
KEY SWITCH, CAP
6.93
$45.59
•
POSTAGE BY PHONE
MISC NUTS, WASHERS
JULY POSTAGE
$87.74
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
STEEL
$13.74
ST.JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC
WIPER BLADE
$101.16
< *>
W.D. COOLING CLINIC
RADIATOR REPAIR, LABOR 6 PARTS
$67.36
$971.58
$4,815.16*
GENERAL FUND
AAGARD WEST
AUG SERVICE
ABDO ABDO & EICK
ALLEN PRECISION
SERVICES THRU 7/31/96
$5 $947$947 .24
AMERICAN RED CROSS
STARE CHASERS, PR NAILS
POOL SAFETY, WATER POWER
.00 22
$89
ANDERSON, DOUG
ARNOLD
REFUND TREE APPLICATION
$458.32
$10.00
MCDOWELL
JULY COMPENSATION
$6,666.00
BAHR, SUE
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- 1996 -97
$84.00
BALTIMORE AIRCOIL
REFUND SOCCER CAMP
BELT FAN, GASKET
$48.00
BEACON BALLFIELDS
DRAG W /BAR
$134.19
BEE ARENA PRODUCTS
KIT PAPER LINE HOCKEY
$307.00
BENNNNET T OFFICE SUP.
SERVICE CONTRACT
$74.50
BENSHOOF, DEB
B RISK SERVICES
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$10.00
$13.00
BRRAUNAUN, , MARION
PROFESS SERV
REFUND SENIOR TOUR
$800.00
BRO STUDIO
PHOTO FINISH
$34.00
BROWWNN, , ANDY NDY
UNPIRE
$12.74
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
CADD /ENGINEERING
PAPER, PRINT CRTG
$12.50
$214.57
SUPPLY
CASH WISE
BLUELINE 250 /PK
$51.36
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
SUPPLIES
FILE
576.58
CENTRAL NEWSPAPER
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
AIRPORT NEWS, JULY ISSUE
227.16
125.00
CHRISTENSEN, R.B.
MUSIC IN THE PARK
PIANO TUNING
$1,500.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
JULY LODGING TAX
$58.00
COAST TO COAST
NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS
$50,062.00
COLLETTE, JESSE
REFUND POOL PASS
$1,219.04
COMM TRANSPORTATION
HANGAR PAYMENT- AUGUST
$24.00
$800.00
f
�J
11-Al
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996, 11:55 AM page
_________________________ _______________________________
GENERAL FUND COMPRESS AIR
______________________ ________
AIA QUALITY TESTS
_ _________
$300.00
COMPTON, KELLI
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
$12.75
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
REPL SUSP RATCHET
$71.93
COUNTY TREASURER
•
PARCEL CHANGE PRINTOUT
$4.90
CROW RIVER GLASS
DOOR WINDOWS, REINF PIVOTS
$382.80
DAAK, JEFF
DANIELS, SHARON
REFUND -CLASS C WINNER
$100.00
DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY
REFUND TWINS GAME
KEYBOARD CADDY
$6.50
DECKER, ANNIE
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
$$6.37
$19.25
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR FEES TO STATE
$520.00
DEPT OF LABOR 6 INDUSTRY
AIRPORT INSPECTION
$10.00
DEVRIES, NICK
CONCESSION STAND
$21.25
DJ'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
CABLE TIES, EAR MUFF
$30.86
DOMINO'S PIZZA
PIZZAS
$709.00
EINCK, E
TOURNAMENT WORKER
$50.00 75.00
ELLIG, TRACY
TRACY
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
EMME, LYLE
FAMILY REXALL DRUG
SPEAKER FEE - ADVENTURE CAMP
$$13.00
FEED CONTROLS
FILM
CHLORINE, SODA CAUSTIC LIQ
$54.71
$535.73
FESTIVAL FOODS
LUNCHES
$464.99
FITZI,OFF HARDWARE
SCREEN
$151.43
FOR Y SUSAN
REFUND SWIM CLASS
$30.00
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS
TAPE
$186.75
FORTIS BENEFITS
G
AUG LTD
$1,533.37
i K SERVICES
GALL'S INC
UNIFORMS
$812.13
GAME TIME
EMS PANTS
STANDARD GOAL
$101.92
GARBERG, MINCIA
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$65.29
$15.00
GENE'S S INC
GENE'S TOWING
HAND CLEANER, EYESALINE REFILL
$57.20
GI, CARRIE
TOWING SERVICE
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$53.25
$13.00
GIESESE, RICK
GREAT
AT PLAINS SUPPLY
MPIRE
2 X 4
$343.00
GRZEP, MEGAN
BTR SPF, NAILS
DANCELINE INSTRUCTOR
$130.49
$120.00
HAAS, TERESA
MALI -BRITE INC
PARTIAL REFUND
$15.00
HARTELT, ROBERT
LAMPS
REFUND LIFEGUARDING CLASS
$76.21
$30.00
HAYNES, TRICIA
DEPOSIT MUSICAL SHOW - 11/2/96
$200.00
HENRYS FOODS INC
HENSEN, MARK
GUM, CANDY, CHIPS
51,321.12
HEPOLA, BETH
SW CHAPTER MTG FEE, MEALS
$.11
• HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
REFUND DIVING CLASS
BROWN TOWEL
$17
$17.00
HOVDA, RACHEL
REFUND RIBBON 6 DANCE
$1,4$8.47
58.00
HUBIN PUBLISHING CO
HUTCH CONVENTION 6
SPONSOR BUFFALO LAKE FIRE AD
520.00
HUTCH COOP CENEX
JUNE LODGING TAX
JULY FUEL
$4,839.34
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
EXTING RECHARGE
$1,315.04
$210.98
HUTCH FIRE DEPT GENERAL ACCT
FIRE INVEST CLASS
$1,739.13
HUTCHINSON LEADER
ADS
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
AUG SERVICE
$807.67
$5,558.42
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
BULBS
$6,707.27
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
SWITCH
IDEAL SHOE SHOP
INK SPOTS
MATERIAL f LABOR- AWNING REPAIR
$9.60
5350.00
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
FOLDING, COLLATING- SURVEY
CHECK RUNWAY 6 TAXI LIGHTS
99.17
JOSS SPORT SHOP
SOFTBALL /BASEBALL RIBBONS
64.04
$322.80
JOHNSON, KERRY
JOHNSON, TORY
SUMMER GYMNASTICS CAMP
$140.00
KELLY, LEROY
REFUND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
575
$75.00
KING, TOM
UMPIRE GAMES
CARNIVAL, SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT
$180.00
KO JOANNE
A
REFUND SKATING CLASS
61.63
KOENIGNIG, KERRY
KE, MARY
REFUND RIBBON � DANCE
.00
.00
$ $88REFUND
KRUEGUEGER, MELISSA
PARTIAL REFUND
FOR OVERPAYMENT
$15.00
L P SUPPLY CO
LABOR- REPAIR WEED WHIP
.00
517
$$17.50
LADE, BRYAN
CARSON, LISA
REFUND - WINNING TEAM CLASS D
$100.00
LEHN, JEFF
LNNES,
PARTIAL REFUND
REFUND FIELD RESERVATION
$15.00
$10.00
RICHARD
LIND, CURT
JULY COMPENSATION
$2, .78
LINDER BUS COMPANY
REFUND ADVENTURE CAMP
BUS TRANSPORTATION
$18
$18.00
CINDER, CASSIE
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
51,497.10
LINDER, NIKI
LIQUOR HUTCH
TRACK FIELD, KIDDIE CARNIVAL
TROTBEER
$12.75
$23.50
LOGIS
JULY SERVICE
$29.70
LUND, SHERRY
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$5,$26.29
$26.00
r 1
L_J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996,
11:55 AM
page 3
------- _---- _____------- _------ __ __________---
GENERAL FUND MADSON, STEVEN
_____________ ______________________________
FBI SEMINAR- MEALS,PAR K,HOTEL
______
$411.42
MARCO BUS.PRODUCTS
LABOR, TRAVEL & PARTS
$216.08
MCKEEVER, LAURAL
MCKEEVER, LAUREL
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$13.00
• MCLEOD COOP POWER
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
JULY ELEC
$13.00
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
BALANCE OF TRANSFER FEE
$458.89
$90$90.07
MEMINDEK
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
CALENDAR
VOLLEYBALLS
.00
$
MID AMERICAN RESEARCH CHEMICAL SILICONIZED RELEASE AGENT
$126.31
$361.04
MILLS, JOHN & HELEN
REFUND SENIOR TOUR
$34.00
MINNCOMM PAGING
SERVICE & RENT - AUGUST
$27.16
MINNCOR CENTRAL
STRAIGHT EDGES
$144.69
MINNESOTA CLE
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
REG -DAVE ERLANDSON
$390.00
MN ELEVATOR INC.
KEYBOARD CADDY
ELEVATOR SERVICE
$82.41
MN MUTUAL LIFE
AUG COBRA- MATTSFIELD
$67.90
$542.43
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
MEMIBERSHIP DUES
$150.00
MN SPORTS FEDERATION
STATE TOURNAMENT
$100.00
MOON, DOLF
MR. MOVIES
MEALS- WILLAAR & WATERLOO TRIP
$31.31
MUETZEL, BRUCE
RENTAL
REFUND -TUES C WINNER
$11.75
$100.00
MUSEL, DAWN
NELSON, DENISE
REFUND SPORTS CAMP
$10.00
NELSON, STEPHANIE
REFUND WOMEN'S PENTACULAR
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
$75.00
NEW UTAS MONUMENT COMPANY
RESET & RESEAL MONUMENTS
$12.75
$2,420.00
NICKLASSON ATHLETIC CO
BASEBALLS, BATS
$324.11
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS
MISC NC NUT HX FIN
LASER JET TONER CARTR
$62.75
PANKAKE, MICHELLE
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
$108.94
$ 22.50
PAULSON, ADAIR
ICE SHOW ANNOUNCER
5250.00
PELLINEN, WILLARD
PETERSON, JEAN
PROFESS SERVICES
$`795.00
POSTAGE BY PHONE
REFUND SENIOR TOUR
JULY POSTAGE
$34.00
POWELL, MARVA
11 HOURS PREP & SUPV
$831.24
82.50
QUADS ELECTRIC
LAMPS
QUEEN OF EXELSIOR
CRUISE -AUG 24, 1996
65.39
$858.64
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
ICE BLADE GRIND
$26.00
RE- DUN -IT APPLIANCE
APPLIANCE PICKUP
$40.00
RECREONSTE
RINK SYSTEMS
UNIV HEAD IMMOBILIZER
$61.74
RODEBERG, JOHN
LABOR, MILEAGE, DRIVING TIME
MEALS, PARK, HOTEL- CONFERENCES
$442.20
ROMO, JOHN L.
•
HOURS WORKED
$489.16
$192.00
ROSENOW, BRUCE
ROSSITER, AMY
HOURS WORKED
$240.00
R ASSOC
P
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
ARCCAD UPGRADE
$36.00
RUNKENKE, BRUCE
RUNKE, MARGARET
BUS RODEO- MEALS,MILEAGE,HOTEL
$340.80
$197.53
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
PARTIAL REFUND
HDWE, GUARD CLIP
.00
$15$15.36
SALLY DISTRIBUTORS
,
CANDY, BALL, FLYING SAUCERS
$
291.14
JOHN
SCENIC
UMPIRE
SCENIC SIGNS
S
DECALS
SCHAEFER, DAVID
UMPIRE
$26.00
$26.80
SCHALL, GENELLE
REFUND POOL RENTAL
$.50
$7.50
$7
SCHWANS SALES ENTERPRISES INC
ICE CREAM PRODUCTS
$55.72
SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY
LAUNDRY
SHAW, KAREN
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
SENIOR LINE DANCE 5.5 HOURS
74.54
82.50
SMITH, JENNY
pOLy
REFUND SWIMMING LESSONS
$30.34
$13.00
STANDAR BUS PRINTING
STANDARD PRINTING
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
$803.85
STUCKE,
CARTRIDGE, LABELS
$$26.92
S LACY
LU
RECHARGE BATTERY
CANCEL SHELTER RESERVATION
$26.57
SUTTER, ATTER ROBERT
TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES
REFUND TREE APPLICATION
15.00
10.00
TILTON,ON INC
SOFTDESK CIVIL UPGRADES
JULY EMPLOYER CONTRIB -G PLOTZ
$608.00
TILTON, DAVID
UMPIRE
$238.90
TRI
TRI CO WATER
PROFESS SERV -PHASE II
$210.00
$1'877.37
TRIPLE G DISTRIBUTING INC
RIBA
JULY SALT DELIVERY
SNAPPLE -KIWI STRW
$15.66
TURCOTTE, TERESA
PARTIAL REFUND
TWO WAY COMM INC
U OF M RAPTOR CENTER
DPC SLIM, TRADE MIGHTY CELL
$$54.20
15.00
$397.43
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
SPEAKER FEES - ADVENTURE CAMP
RETURN CLEAR POLY
$140.00
UNIVERSITY OF MN
REG -JOHN RODERBERG
-$36.74
US WEST COMMUN
AUG SERVICE
$95.00
VIKING COCA COLA
JUNE POP PURCHASE
$207.21
$915.15
r 1
L_J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996, 11:55 AM
---------------------------------------------
GENERAL FUND
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
$87.05
VOSS LIGHTING
•
WAGNER, JEFF
WAGNER, JENNIFER
SKYJACK
REPAIR TOILET
WAL -MART
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
WALTER, MELVIN & DOROTHY
$75.15
$8$8
WEST PUBLISHING CO
REFUND SWIMMING
WILLIAMS, COLIN
$
WITTE SOD
GLITTER, PAINT,
WORD PERFECT CORPORATION
$$13.00
WRIGHT, LEE
REFUND SENIOR TOUR
XEROX CORP
.90
ZILLMER, RICK
AUG SERVICE
$61
HAT -FAC. CONST
< *>
HOUSING REDEV
HUTCH TRANS FAC
•
LIQUOR
•
STORE
BREMIX CONCRETE CO
KLEESPIE
HEIDECKER &, RICK
page
_______________ __
HP LASER CRTRDG
_______________________________
SERIES II
$87.05
__
FB40WW /6
SKYJACK
REPAIR TOILET
$481.29
KIDDIE CARNIVAL
WATER /SEWER THRU 6130196
$75.15
$8$8
REFUND SWIMMING
LESSONS
$
.50
GLITTER, PAINT,
EYES, PAPER
$$13.00
$152.90
REFUND SENIOR TOUR
$34.00
.90
MN ST AN V48
AUG SERVICE
$61
.91
UMPIRE
$1$205.12
.33
$$61.00
COFFEE
SOD
SUBSCRIPTION
.55
$12.60
$
UMPIRE
JULY POSTAGE
$24.00
.00
5355 JULY USAGE
$8
$150.00
$588.33
JULY SERVICE
UMPIRE
$195.00
$12,416.84*
AUG SERVICE
JULY GAS & ELECTRIC
$132,643.40*
ALLIED MECH.SYSTEMS
ALLIED SERVICES OF HUTCHINSON
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COAST TO COAST
ERICKSON & TEMPLIN
G & K SERVICES
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
METRO SALES
POSTAGE BY PHONE
SCHMELING OIL CO
WAL -MART
WITTE SANITATION
AAGARD WEST
AM.LINEN SUPPLY CO
AMERICAN LEGION POST 21
BERNICKS PEPSI COLA
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CHUCK'S REF
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COAST TO COAST
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
FESTIVAL FOODS
FORTIS BENEFITS
FRIENDLY BEVERAGE CO
GLENCOE ENTERPRISE
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
HENRYS FOODS INC
HERMEL WHOLESALE
HUTCHINSON LEADER
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
JORDON BEVERAGE INC.
KARP RADIO
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
LEO'S TRANSFER
LOCHER BROS INC
MN MUTUAL LIFE
POSTAGE BY PHONE
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE
TRI CO WATER COND
TRIPLE G DISTRIBUTING INC
VIKING COCA COLA
PSI MIX, WINTER SERV CONCRETE $686.63
HATS FUEL- EXTRAS $6,425.88
$7,112.51*
ELECTRICAL WORK
$1,463.78
JULY DELIVERIES
$1,463.78*
SKYJACK
REPAIR TOILET
$481.29
WATER /SEWER THRU 6130196
$45.00
$516.71
CLEANING
$32$32.00
SCRAPER WORK ON 7/8/96
$1,
.35
UNIFORMS
$152.90
KITCHEN TOWEL
$32
AUG SERVICE
$$32
.91
JULY GAS & ELEC
$1$205.12
COFFEE
$30$30.00
.55
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$
.00
JULY POSTAGE
$133$133.43
.00
DIESEL FUEL
FAN
$8
.21
JULY SERVICE
17.00
$63.37
JULY ADVERTISEMENT
$12,416.84*
AUG SERVICE
$45.20
JULY DELIVERIES
$153.86
ADVERTISING -ST BASEBALL TOURN
$52.50
JULY POP PURCHASES
$115.40
JULY PURCHASES
$90.51
FILTERS, LABOR
$53.87
LOTTERY PAYMENT
$1,251.18
BULBS, TAPE, CORD GUARD
$29$29.43
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$5,
.63
SUPPLIES
$16.85
AUG LTD
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$36
$858.55
.93
JULY ADVERTISING
JULY WINE PURCHASE
$3
.00
JULY TOBACCO PURCHSES
,$78$78
$957.47
.43
JULY TOBACCO PURCHASES
$587.12
JULY ADVERTISEMENT
$121.77
AUG SERVICE
JULY GAS & ELECTRIC
$130.00
JULY WINE PURCHASE
$1,188.46
$3,990.54
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$713.15
JULY ADVERTISING
JULY BEER PURCHASE
.00
$7 $8$8.25
2ND HALF FREIGHT -JULY
$623
JULY BEER PURCHASE
AUG LIFE
.92
$3$623.30
JULY POSTAGE
$13.02
AUG BEER PURCHASE
$24.64
$6,485.22
ADVERTISING
$239.00
JULY WATER DELIVERIES
31.62
$$36.70
JULY BEER PURCHASE
JULY POP PURCHASE
$8,
$536.50
$40,354.02*
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996, 11:55 AM
page
---- ----- ------ ---- ------ - --------------------------------
PUBLIC SITES MCLEOD COOP POWER
5 ELECTRICAL HOOKUPS $4,000.00
$4,000.00*
I ..AL
WATER /SEWER FUND
E
I
HUTCH FIRE DEPT GENERAL ACCT
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
AAGARD WEST
AUMA ACTUATORS
BERG - JOHNSON ASSOC
BRANDON TIRE CO
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
CASH WISE
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COAST TO COAST
D.P.C.IND.INC
DEVRIES, RANDY
DYNA SYSTEMS
EBERT, RICHARD
ELECTRIC MOTOR CO
ELECTRO WATCHMAN
FAMILY REXALL DRUG
FEED RITE CONTROLS
FESTIVAL FOODS
FITZLOFF HARDWARE
FORTIS BENEFITS
G & K SERVICES
GOPHER STATE INC
GRAHAM, MARION
GRAINGER
GRAUPMAN, ROSE MARIE
HARRIS CONTRACTING
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
HUTCH COOP CENEX
HUTCHINSON LEADER
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES
INFRATECH
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
K MART
L & P SUPPLY CO
LAMPLIGHTER II
LOGIS
MACRO SCIENTIFIC
MCNELLY GROUP
METRO SALES
MIDWEST MACHINE TOOL SUPPLY
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN MUTUAL LIFE
MN SEC.AWWA
MN VALLEY TESTING LAB
NALCO CHEMICAL CO.
NCL
NOTT COMPANY
POSTAGE BY PHONE
QUADE ELECTRIC
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
RUTZ PLBG & HTG
SANIFILL INC
SOUTHERN MN CONSTRUCTION CO
TEK MECHANICAL
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
WATERPRO
WITTE SANITATION
TOWN BOARD MTG
BULB
JULY PICKUP
REPAIR AUMA ACTUATOR
PH SENSOR
MOUNT /DISMOUNT, TIRE
LABOR, ON -SITE CHARGE
SUPPLIES
CARTRIDGE, DISKETTE
AUG MED
SURGE STRIP
SULFUR DIOXIDE, CHLORINE
AIRLINE TICKET
CAPSCREW
MEALS, MI LEAGE, HOTEL -MWOA CONF
BEARING, INSTALL, CLEAN
SERVICE CALL -PUMP HOUSE 4 & 5
FILM
ACID HYDROFLOUS
BLEACH
CABLE TIES
AUG LTD
UNIFORMS
JUNE SERVICE
MEALS,MILEAGE,HOTEL -MWOA CONF
30 AMP POWER RELAY
CLOSING BILL PAID TWICE
JULY PREV MAINT
WINDOW BRUSH
TIRE REPAIR
ADS
AUG SERVICE
POSTAGE JULY 3
JULY RENT
LINK -PIPE
TROUBLESHOOT ELEM LIFT STN
MEALS, MILEAGE, HOTEL -MWOA CONF
PAPER, TACKS, SPKR MOUNT
RENTAL CHARGE
MEAL CHARGES
JULY SERVICE
CARTRIDGE NANOPURE
JULY COMPOSTING LEASE
SERVICE AGREEMENT
VANE
VIDEO, GLOVES, GUIDE
AUG LIFE
PEG -RANDY DEVRIES
WATER TESTS
NALCO 8325 LIQUID
M -FC BROTH
FOOT FOR 9* TROUGH
JULY POSTAGE
FILTERS
EXPRESS DIALER
GLOVES, SPRINKLER
LABOR & REPAIRS
LOADS 7/8 TO 7/12
TUB GRINDER
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
UNDERMOUNT SLIDES, MOUNT BRKTS
ECR TOUCH PAD
MOVE DUMPSTERS -TIME & LABOR
$15.93
$10.06
$25.99*
$26,475.38
$1,707.00
$262.72
$166.92
$757.94
$49.79
$290.68
$4,266.71
$417.86
$1,031.16
$251.00
$71.97
$127.66
$52.49
$275.00
$30.01
$809.42
$14.83
$5.28
$201.46
$295.60
$154.00
5145.34
$15.02
$16.94
$1,055.00
8450.06
107.01
$272.36
$627.66
$21,567.21
$49.53
$1,495.00
$793.00
$124.06
$59.15
47.93
40.00
$1,935.34
$990.09
$5,325.00
$194.00
$12.54
$4.84
$70.77
$50.00
$1,402.50
$574.63
$207.96
$76.76
$148.17
$94.26
$9,798.00
$45.29
$146.61
$5,862.40
$4,000.00
.74
M.59
$11,322.03
$396.88
$107,352.55*
$472,700.25*
IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 13, 1996, 11:55 AM
page
---- --- --- ------ ----- --------------- _ -'- ---
1996 IMPRO CONST COMM TRANSPORTATION
---"-FUND-'
'- _____ ----------
LOCAL - FUND - DEPOSIT _
- - ---" -'-- - - -_-
< h
$22,758.15
�NERAL FUND
DEPT
$22,758.15*
NATURAL RESOURCES
HARTLAND AVIATION
DNR FEES TO STATE
$914.00
MINNESOTA CLE
8501 GALS AV FUEL
REG -RON RIRCHOFF
$11,215.63
PRIEVE LANDSCAPING
170 TREES
$195.00
< *>
$9,330.00
$21,654.63*
HOUSING REDEV
MONTES 6, JOANN
ROOFING
< *>
3,900.00
13,900.00*
LIQUOR STORE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ED PHILLIPS
PAYROLL 7 -19 -96
$14,155.95
R SONS CO.
COOPER R CO
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$2,616.86
JOHNSON
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
BEVERAGE DIST.
LOCHER
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$10,073.45
$9,571.08
INC
LOCHER BWIN INC
B
JULY BEER PURCHASE
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$4,768.55
QUALITY WINE L SPIRITS CO.
SEGAL WHOLESALE
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$7,840.10
$3,795.53
TRIPLE G DISTRIBUTING INC
MISC TOBACCO PRODUCTS
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$2,431.55
7,437.35
N2,690.42*
PAYROLL FUND
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO.
GREAT WEST LIFE INS.
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$770.00
CO.
H.R.L.ETIRE
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$160.00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$160.28
PERA LIFE INS CO.
PRUDE D.C.P.
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
52,551.91
$$52.50
PRUDENTIAL
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
552.02
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
5$30.00
$30.00
TEMPLETON INC
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$14,413.93
WITHHO & REED
WITHHOLDING TAX ACCT
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$448.46
$150.00
< *>
EMPLOYEE CONTRIB 7 -27
$37,585.17
*ER
$56,566.27*
/SEWER FUND
EBERT, RICHARD
GRAHAM, MARION
CONF LODGING
$168.00
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
CONF LODGING
CONF LODGING
$168.00
< *>
$168.00
$073.47* 504.00*
Wire Transfers
$188,
Mn Dept of Revenue Electronic Transfer
7,422.50
Depository Trust Company - Interest
1991
Improvement Bonds
1990
Improvement Bonds
31,672.50
1990
Taxable Medical
39,037.50
1990
Medical Facilities
142,321.88
1992
Improvement Bonds
98,276.25
1993
Improvement Bonds
36,646.25
1994
Improvement Bonds
34,323.75
1995
G.O. Bonds 19958
86,923.13
1995
Improvement Bonds
39,188.75
101,818.75
Total Interest Paid
610,208.76
Depository
Trust Company
1990A
G.O. Med. Fac. - Principal
80 000.00
L]
MINNESOTA Department of Revenue
0
•
0
Commissioner's Office
August 9, 1996
Dear Mayor:
St. Paul, Minnesota 55146 -7100
AUG 1 21996
As you begin to finalize your budget decisions for 1997, I am writing to encourage
you once again to hold the line on spending and property tax increases. I also
want to provide you with some additional information about the "price of
government" resolution adopted in March of 1995.
If you recall, the resolution established revenue "targets," expressed as a
percentage of Minnesota personal income. The revenues incorporated in these
targets include all state and local taxes, fees, charges, and other own - source
revenues. The resolution that was adopted by the Governor and the Legislature
calls for a reduction in the price of government from 18.2 percent for the fiscal
year 1996/97 biennium to 17.8 percent in the fiscal year 1998/99 biennium. The
adopted revenue targets also incorporate a declining ratio for cities, as a group,
through the next biennium. Specifically, the statewide city "price of government"
target ratio declines from 2.87 percent for the fiscal year 1996/97 biennium to 2.84
percent for the fiscal year 1998/99 biennium.
The price of government law also requires me, as Commissioner of Revenue, to
inform the Governor and the Legislature, as part of the February forecast, about
the performance of local governments (i.e. cities as a group vs. counties as a
group) with respect to their revenue targets. I want to be able to report that all
groups of local governments are performing within their respective revenue
targets. But, this will require continued vigilance wherever spending and taxing
decisions are made.
As you may recall, last year just prior to your truth -in- taxation hearings it was
suggested that cities, as a group, should hold their levy increase to about 4 percent.
This guideline was presented to you as a way to keep city levy increases consistent
with the levy increase that was incorporated into the price of government
resolution. Last year, cities initially proposed levy increases of 6.8 percent or $44
million. In the end, final 1996 levies, for all cities combined, showed an increase
of 5.1 percent or $33 million. This increase was approximately $7 million over the
suggested guideline.
An equal opportunity employer
TDD: (612) 297 -2196
Mayor
August 9, 1996
Page 2
Preliminary information on other city revenues and state personal income suggests
that cities are currently performing within their overall price of government
targets. However, the price of government ratio is quite sensitive to variations in
personal income and, while recent forecasts indicate stronger income growth than
originally anticipated, the slightest economic downturn combined with current
rates of increase in city revenues could put the achievement of price of
government goals in jeopardy.
Minnesota's overall fiscal environment remains very uncertain. Although recent
reports from the Department of Finance indicate that state tax revenues are
currently nerf -rming above forecast, the long term stnrctural imbalance between
revenues and spending still looms. In addition, continued actions taken by the
federal government to withdraw aid and entitlement support will increase fiscal
pressures on both state and local government budgets.
The November 1996 forecast will provide the first real opportunity to begin
assessing how state and local governments are performing with respect to the price
of government resolution. The November forecast will also provide planning
estimates of state and local revenues and the projected price of government
through the fiscal year 2000/01 biennium. This forecast will, in effect, set the
stage for a new price of government resolution which is required, by law, to be
adopted by the Governor and the Legislature in March of 1997.
Because of these economic and policy constraints, it is important for all public
officials, at both the state and local levels, to do all they can to hold the line on
government spending. Both the Governor and Legislature are committed to
reducing the overall price of government in Minnesota as reflected in the price of
government resolution targets. By each of us making tough decisions today, it
will make it easier for all of us to adapt to the tighter fiscal conditions that loom in
the future.
Sincerely,
/Jai mes L. Girard
Commissioner
0
r\
LJ
•
DAVID B. ARNOLD'
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON'
LAURA K. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE**
JANE VAN VALKENBURG
RICHARD G. MDGEE
CATHRYN D. REHER
WALTER P. MICHELS, III
'ALSO ADMITTEO IN TEXAS AND NEW YORA
ARNOLD, ANDERSON & DOVEORYOURE�
PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(320) 587 -7575
FAX (320) 587 -4096
Mr. Rob Gordon
Midwest Cablevision
P.O. Box 563
103 East Second Street
Redwood Falls, Mn. 56283
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
July 29, 1996
OF COUNSEL
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
ARTHUR L. DOTEN
TERRI A. BLOMFELT
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
16121 545.9000
FAX 1612) 545 -1793
FAX (612) 542 -9210
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389.2214
FAX (612) 389 -5506
Re: Cable Television Services to City of Hutchinson
Our File No. 3244 -93054
is Dear Mr. Gordon:
It has come to my attention by way of complaints from several
property owners that Midwest Cablevision has provided for cable
television services to a portion of the Hunters Ridge addition to
the City of Hutchinson but not, unfortunately, to the balance of
Hunters Ridge addition. Further, it has been reported to me by at
least a couple of individuals that no extensions are planned
because "we don't have the money" and when an additional complaint
was registered, the response was "sorry, that's life."
The properties in question most specifically are at 1435 8th Avenue
S.W., 1441 8th Avenue S.W. and 850 Hunter Street S.W., but I
understand other homes on the north side of Hunters Ridge are
affected and as the development fills up, additional homes will
also be affected by the apparent refusal of Midwest Cablevision to
provide cable services within the city limits of the City of
Hutchinson as required by the franchise agreement by and between
Midwest Cablevision and the City of Hutchinson.
I would appreciate it if you would look into this matter and make
provisions for the extension of service to the addresses given
above.
Additionally, both the Council and myself remain concerned about
the status of the planned rebuild of the cable system in
Hutchinson. As you know, under Ordinance No. 95 -131, the plan
rebuild must be completed no later than April 25, 1998 and we are
now nearly a year and a half into that process with no sign that
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
Mr. Rob Gordon
July 29, 1996
Page 2
any construction will commence int he near future. Further, the
perspective merger partner for DD Cable Holdings, Inc., doing
business as Midwest Cablevision, has had difficulties in at least
one area community.
I would appreciate it if you would look into these matters as soon
as possible. The City has property owners who have invested in
excess of $200,000 in homes located within the city limits and
virtually within rock throwing distance of the public schools and
to argue that it is technically or economically not feasible to
provide service to them does not appear to me to be a supportable
position. Perhaps there is simply some confusion on this point and
you will be able to assure this office, so that I can pass along
those assurances to the property owners, that service will be
immediately forthcoming.
Thank you for your time and attention to these matters. Best
personal regards.
Very tru
ARNOLD,
G. Barry ADVersorf
GBA:lm
CC Tom Creighton
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Alan Krumrey, 850 Hunter Street
Dennis Kahl, Compton /Kahl
S.W., Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
9
L�
0
0
DAVID S. ARNOLD'
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON*
LAURA K. FRETLAND
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE"
JANE VAN VALKENBURG
RICHARD G. MDGEE
CATHRYN D. REHER
WALTER P. MICHELS, III
1AL50 ADMITTED IN TE. AMD .0 YORk
ARNOLD, ANDERSON & DOVE
PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 -2563
(320) 587-7575
FAX (320) 587 -4096
Mr. Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street S.E.
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
G. BARRY ANDERSON
July 24, 1996
JUL 2 5 1996
C'
OF COUNSEL
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
ARTHUR L. DOTEN
5881 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545-9000
FAX (612) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
1612) 389 -2214
FAX (612) 389 -5506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Dear Gary:
I am enclosing herewith a copy of an article from Phil Schweizer at
• Spruce Ridge Resource Management Facility entitled "USA Waste,
Sanifill to Merge." As you know, Sanifill is the owner of the
existing landfill facility here in McLeod County which does
business under the name of Spruce Ridge Resource Management
Facility.
r�
L
It is too early to tell whether this merger has any impact at all
on McLeod County operations, but it would appear, at least
initially, that any such impact would be very minimal because the
new entity has relatively few assets in Minnesota and surrounding
states and thus any effect, at least at this early juncture is more
likely to be positive than negative.
In any event, I wanted to pass this information along to the
Council although no action is required.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions
in connection with the foregoing. Best regards.
GBA:lm
L. P.
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
0 0
Reporting on solid -waste management,
0
A Gain puhlicll
1996
from product design to disposal and recovery
USA Waste, Sanifill to merge
By John Russell
DAiLAS —Two fast - growing waste
companies, USA Waste Services `
Inc. and Sanifill Inc., plan to
merge their operations in a deal
they say will allow them to ac-
celerate their growth and profits
even faster.
USA Waste plans to pay Sani-
fill about $1.6 billion in a stock
deal. The combined companies,
with estimated 1996 revenues of
$1.3 billion, would represent the
third- largest waste company in
North America.
Several analysts said the deal,
announced June 24, would maxi-
mize ench company's strengths
rind geographic operations. USA
Waste is regarded as a lean,
profitable collection company,
while Sanifill is one of the most
efficient operators of landfills in
the country.
"It's a combination that makes
tremendous sense," said 13nrry
Mannis, an analyst with Gold-
man Sachs & Co. in Now York.
"I call it a June wedding, full of
promise."
. For Sanifill, the merger mnrks
an end to six years of indepen-
dent growth and numerous
courtships by other companies
interested in a merger.
For USA Waste, the den] is
the fourth time it has combined
with another public company in
the past three years, including
F.nvirofil Inc. and Chambers De-
velopment Corp. USA Waste
completed the last of the three
deals, its $525 million merger
with Western Waste, just seven
weeks ago.
USA Waste's growth, despite
its blistering pace, is under con-
trol, and the company is ready
for another big step, said John
Drury, chairman and CFO.
See Merger, Page 23
Merger
ntinued from Pape 1
The other deals are done," he
id. "We have digested them.
e are ready to move on."
Drury will retain his titles af-
r the merger. Rodney Proto,
esident and chief operating of-
_er of Sanifill, will assume
ose positions at the combined
mpanies. Lorne Bain, chair -
an and CEO of Sanifill, will
sign after the merger is done.
Under the deal, Sanifill stock -
)lders will receive 1.7 shares of
SA Waste common stock for
ch Sanifill share.
Officials expect to wrap up the
,al by October, barring any an-
--rust problems or objections by
iareholders.
Drury said he expected the
mbined companies to increase
:rnings per share by 25 percent
er the next three years.
Drury said he-began making
oves toward Sanifill in Janu-
y, shortly after USA Waste
inounced its Western Waste
erger plans.
"We've had conversations with
anifill since I became CEO, but
. one way or another they were
)orted," Drury said. 'But in
anuary, I said if it's going to
appen, it will happen in 1996,
let's get the Western Waste
- erger behind us and get in se-
aus discussion."
As with many corporate deals,
:is one involved people who
yew each other for several
cars, on both sides of the table.
Drury and Proto had worked
gether at Browning -Ferns In-
.istries Inc for several years,
rury as company president and
roto as president of the com-
any's European operations.
Drury left BFI in 1991 to go
.to investment banking for a
mall Houston rum. In 1992, he
:ceived a call from Bain, the
ew chairman and CEO of Sani -
11, who asked to get together
,r lunch. Bain wanted some
.rategic ,advice and,:some sug-
astions for a capable 'eiecutive
handle the company s opera -
ons.
"I gave him a couple of names,
nd one was Rod Proto, ",Drury
aid. "Rod is a very good'friend-
nd a well - respected leader."
Prato shortly was named pres-
lent of Sanifill, and the iwu
ept up their friendship. Drury,
,r his part, joined USA Waste
1 1994.
"Our organizations know each
.her well," Bain said. "We're es-
�ntially both pursuing what are
ent that the best thing to do is
to combine our companies."
A year ago, many on Wall
Street wondered if USA Waste
was growing too fast, cutting too
many deals too soon together,
without focusing on profitability.
But many of those doubts
have died since USA Waste
proved it didn't waste time cut-
ting overlapping operations.
"If there's one thing USA
Waste has demonstrated, it's re-
markable skill at integrating ac-
quisitions rapidly," Mannis said.
'They're running well ahead
of schedule on integrating West-
ern, and that's probably why
they were comfortable turning
their sights on Sanifill so quick-
ly."
Sanifill, for its part, said it
hasn't sought out a merger but
found itself on the receiving end
of many merger talks.
Sanifill and USA Waste have
substantial overlapping opera-
tions in Houston, Denver, Vir-
ginia and Atlanta. The merger
will allow the combined compa-
nies to save up to $35 million
and about 50 jobs.
USA Waste said it expects to
see many of those job cuts come
from its own ranks, unlike sev-
eral recent mergers it conducted
where the majority of cuts came
from the other company.
That's because USA Waste
agreed to move the headquarters
of the combined companies to
Houston, Sanifill's home base, as
a condition of the deal. Both
companies have large operations
there, while USA Waste doesn't
do much business in Dallas, its
backyard.
"Not all of the people from our
corporate office will be going to
Houston," Drury said. "There
were a lot of tears when we an-
nounced it. It was a tough deci-
sion. But it made sense."
Several analysts agreed.
"They are sort of the premium
players in the industry," said
Angus Macdonald, an analyst
for Fahnestock & Co. in Boston.
'Both of their management
teems are thoroughly respected.
They both have high- perfor-
mance cultures. And there are a
lot of geographical reasons they
•
•
I
•
0
[' WASTE NEWS July 1 1996
0 0
EWE,
MON
Oudlook-,,good
for, this merger
The waste industry's mega -
mergers just keep on coming.
The latest union, between
USA Waste Services and Sani-
fill, involves two of the indus-
try's more acquisitive players.
For USA Waste, this is the
fourth merger in three years, fol-
lowing partnerships with Envi-
ronfil, Chambers Development
and Western Waste Industries.
Sanifill has been involved in fre-
quent, albeit smaller, purchases.
All signs point to a successful
venture between USA Waste
and Sanifill. Their operations
complement each other well:
USA Waste is strong in hauling-,
Sanifill has thrived as a landfill
operator.
A key point is USA Waste's
past record for successful merg-
ers. The company already is
ahead of schedule in integrating
its last merger partner, Western
Waste. That deal was an-
nounced just last December.
The ability to successfully
meld companias'with:overlap-
ping offices and difi'erent`corpo-
rate cultures has eluded many a
firm. But USA Waste has dem-
onstrated that it's an old hand
at it.
As always, there will be grow-
ing pains. The firms know oper-
ations and jobs need.to be cut.
Already, USA Waste agreed to
move its headquarters to Sani-
fill's home base, Houston.
The fact that USA Waste has
been successful down'that road
before should help greatly in
paving the way again ■
HAVe You even See"
SuCO 'A NeAT COuP4e?
M�(IbLibi' Ye wwa News
I L
>L
�
L�
-Lr i
.s
+ d.n
L
f
.d ■
M
By John Russell
Duus — Don't look to officials at
USA Waste Services Inc. or San -
ifill•Inc. for an explanation of
the stock activity before their
merger announcement.
Executives at both companies
said-they don't know why Sani-
fill's stock rose about 7.6 percent
the "week before the merger was
unveiled „ from -$44.50 on June
17 to $47.876 on June 21.
Trading was especially-heavy
the Friday before the'announce-
ment, pushing the stock'up $2
that day alone. Options trading
on Sanifill's stock: also- was
heavy.
"You look at the trading going
on, and it looked like there had
to be some sort of leak, `said
John Drury, chairman and CEO
of USA Waste Services.
"I know our board and [Sani-
fill'sl board were very concerned
rise,
about keeping-everything confi -,
dential. It wasn't really an ex -,
panded group; in those discus(
sions at all.”
Stock, in .a company thnt is
being merged into another com-
pany'tende'toiriso after an an-
nouncement;;.;as'r?ipvesters buy
more' shares tiwjhe hope the
merged "'company .will be pared
back and•'inad0mord profitable,
translating ,into more valuable
stock
lr /Asm NEaa, Jury f, 1996
fuirms..-saiv
But that usually doesn't hap-
pen before a merger announce-
ment, unless investors are trad-
ing on rumors or confidential
information.
Executives at both sides de-
nied they had traded on the
stock or leaked the information
to others in advance of a public
announcement, which is illegal.
"I really don't have an expla-
nation for it," said Larne Bain,
chairman and CEO of Sanifill.
"It wasn't until [the day of the
announcement[ that .I under-
stood there was a lot of activity
in the options. You can imagine
we were very busy concluding
the terms of our arrangement.+
and meeting with our board."
If the Securities and Exchange
Commission Is looking into the
matter, it's keeping quiet about
it. A spokesman declined to say
whether an investigation was
under way. 11
• s
ARNOLD, ANDERSON & DOVE
•
PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
101 PARK PLACE
DAVID B. ARNOLD'
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55 350 -2 56 3
STEVEN A. ANDERSON
G. BARRY ANDERSON'
(320) 567 -7575
LAURA K. FRETLAND
FAX (320) 587 -4096
DAVID A. BRUEGGEMANN
PAUL D. DOVE**
RESIDENT ATTORNEY
JANE VAN VALKENBURG
G. BARRY ANDERSON
RICHARD G. McGEE
CATHRYN D. REHER
WALTER P. MICHELS, III
IAL]O ADMITTED IN TE1W2 AND NEW YORK
July 30, 1996
Mr. Gary Plotz
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, Mn. 55350
AUG 2 1996
l;
OF COUNSEL
RAYMOND C. LALLIER
ARTHUR L. DOTEN
5661 CEDAR LAKE ROAD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
(612) 545 -9000
FAX (612) 545 -1793
501 SOUTH FOURTH STREET
PRINCETON, MINNESOTA 55371
(612) 389 -2214
FAX (612) 3835506
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
Dear Gary:
I am enclosing herewith a Wall Street Journal article for Tuesday,
July 2, 1996 entitled "Colorado town condemns city hall in effort
• to avoid lease payments." This is certainly an interesting use of
the city's eminent domain power!
I would appreciate it if you would pass along a copy of this
correspondence and the article to the City Council as a for your
information item.
•
Best personal regards.
Very ,XruXy yours,
ANDERSON & DOVE, FILLIP
G jl$�fry Anderson
G 7m
enc.
CERTIFIED AS A CIVIL TRIAL SPECIALIST BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
"CERTIFIED AS A REAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALI5T BY THE MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
B6 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL TUESDAY, JULY 2, 1996
Col`orad'o Town Condemns
City Hall
In Effort to Avoid
Lease Payments
d
By MAacx LAMM
imade it Impossible for Sheridan to con-
' Staff Reporter of Tx Ww LSr Ee JOum:
tfnue meeting the lease payments. The
It is hard to fight city hall when it's so
city's financial problems began in 1993,
ready to condemn itself.
whip the city's Pace Membership Ware-
When Sheridan, Colo., population 5,330,
- bouse dosed, cutting off a major source of
decided it no longer could afford the S200,-
_ sales -tax revenue for the city. The city's
000-a -year lease payment to hundreds of
dale -tax revenue in 1994 fell to $1.6 million
investors who financed its $3.5 million City
, from S2.4 million in 1990.
Hall building in 1998, it tried to get out of its
Natalie Cohen, editor of the Fiscal
lease. When the offer was rejected, the city
Stress Monitor newsletter, which tracks
condemned its own City Hall through its
local government's financial conditions,
power of "eminent domain," or its right to
warned In a recent issue that condemns-
take property in private use and utilize It
lion . is a risky step for cities to take, but
for public purpose.
may begin "occurring with greater fre-
Sheridan says the investors have no
quency."
choice but to accept Its $642,000 offer — and
For now, though, other municipalities
to say goodbye to the 52.6 million that one
don't appear to be embracing Sheridan's
investor says they are still owed.
approach. Ken Bueche, executive director
"Something in your heart says that's
of the Colorado Municipal League, an
just wrong to condemn a facility you
advocacy group for Colorado's towns and
designed, built and Invested in," said
cities, said he isn't aware of other cities
bondholder David Isaak, who personally
takingsimilar action, adding that "this is a
stands to losq $30,000: He said Sheridan
unique circumstance in Colorado."
"can't afford Rio just throw [Its] rights
around like that."
Sheridan Plan May Set Precedent
Springs to Shut Down
' Under the city's plan, Mr. Isaak and
other investors would receive about 20
3 South Carolina Sites
cents on the dollar for their investments,
which were to be repaid through the an-
And'Pake a Charge
nual lease payments. The building was
-
financed through the sale of "certificate's
of participation," which are used by local
Staff Rep
By a Ww Sra Jovaw orter
governments when they are unable to get
FORT MILL, S.C. — Springs Industries
bondissues approved. They are considered
Inc. said it will close three manufacturing
riskier because the city must appropriate
,
plants In South Carolina as part of a
funds for them each year.
restructuring and consolidation of its fab-
Some municipal- finance , specialists
fear that if Sheridan is successful, other
ric manufacturing operations.
The bed and bath products maker
cities hard - pressed for cash may try sim•
said the plants' closure will result in a
filar measures.
pretax charge of $30.4 million In the
Both Sheridan and the trustee for the
second quaiter, which ended June 29.
Investors, First Trust Co., a Stl Paul,
Some of the production capacity from these
Minn., subsidiary of First Bank, System
plants which employ 850 people, will
Inc of Minneapolis, hired firm€ to ap-
be transferred to other facilities. In the
praise City Hall. First Trust's:'appraisal
year- earlier quarter, Springs earned $14.4
valued the building at $2.8 0. But the
million; or T8 cents a share, on sales of
city's own appraisal put th value at
E532.7 million.
"around 5600.000; " said Lee hillips, an
The company said the decision to dose
attorney for Sheridan. The ci claims that
the plants is the first part of a "two-phase,t
because the building was' isfgned for
major renovation program." Two of the
government use, it has a mu lower value
than a private building.:.''
plants are at least 80 years old, the com-
now
The city's eminent domain case 1s now
s
pany noted. The plan's second phase,
yet to be finalized, will Involve investing in
before a three member tjowm
manufacturing technology, and the com-
pointed -by the Arapahoe County District
p ny
Patty said it plans riT.3 million 1n capital
Court, which will determine the value of
building. A hearing is set for Nov 18 ""r -
c
investments. In addition, Springs will In ;
cur Tufure expenses of $23 miWonf for
�d
1 A'Morally Flawed' Move t
equipment relocatlon and to other'
The city's move 1tea alarmed'some
restructuring costs. rs�{ f 9
authorities and sparked feats that-other
j
cities to financie _'4stress `ralght take
i ii7 c f
Kmart Ends Singapore Venture;
similar steps: In a letter last month to
Sheridan Mayor bale Paftonf Colorado
' ' TROY, Mich. - Imam Corp: said it
3 State Treasurer Bill bwens'said the action
ended °a joint venture with Metro Private'
was "morally flaweO and fiscally Irrespon-
, Ltd, which operated three Kmart storeslq
sible." '' - ' S v , . -
Singapore. ;
But Mr. Phillips, Sheridan's attorney,
A spokeswoman for Kmart said the
said the investors "are going to lose money
three- year-old operation had proved un-
no matter what" because hard times have
profitable.
\
J
F_ .
0
C,
pt
0
tra
edt
T1n
r
0
•
Hutchinson Safety
1996 MCLEOD CO. FAIR
Police/ Fire /
Safety Council
Booth
This year the Hutchinson
Safety Council will be
having a booth at the
McLeod County Fair
(August 16th thru the 20th)
in cooperation with the
Hutchinson Police and Fire
Department. We need as
many volunteers from our
organization as possible to
assist in handing out safety
literature and answering
questions during fair hours.
If you have some
extra time and would like to
volunteer, contact Casey at
234 -3211, and let him know
what times you would be
available.
• SEE YOU AT THE
FA/R111
Council
[HUTCHINSON SAFETY, JOB M1 1
NEXT MEETING
WILL BE AUGUST
25TH, AT THE
V.F.W.
"BRING A GUEST
AS A
PROSPECTIVE
MEMBER"
[HUTCHINSON EMERO. SERVICES r
Disaster Drill
The city of Hutchinson'
Emergency Service
will be testing its emergenc
preparedness on Sept. 23r
(starting at approx. 5:30 PN
at the Hutchinson Wast
Water Treatment Plant.
Numerous public
private emerger
organizations will
assisting with this drill, a
the members of the Safi
Council have been asked
participate as eitt
evaluators or victims. Ti
experience looks to be a f
and exciting event.
If you would like
assist in this drill, cons
Casey at 234 -4211.
couNCl L ev�Aws August meeting agenda
By -Laws
Committee
At the last meeting, it
Vvas decided to form a
;ommittee to redefine the
goals and objectives of the
4utchinson Safety Council.
The committee will be
meeting at the Hutchinson Fire
Station (at 1:00 pm on August
12th) to review the current
Constitution and By -Laws, and
to make any changes that need
to be made to make the Safety
Council a more productive
group for the City of
Hutchinson.
I would like to thank the
owing council members for
unteering their time to serve
this committee:
- Mark Hensen
- Tom Kloss
- Les Smith
- Reading of the previous
j imeeting minutes.
New business.
Old business.
- Discussion.
Next meeting program
!update.
Adjournment
KEEP ON THE
LOOKOUT FOR A
NEW
(REASONABLY
PRICED)
LOCATION TO
HOLD FUTURE
SAFETY COUNCIL
MEETINGS.
LUNCH
,'Noon Meal
,for meetings
I'm sure that many of you
have probably already heard
the bad news of the "long time"
cook for the Safety Council,
Betty Johnson, not being able
Ito spoil us once a month with
:her GREAT noon meals.
Betty contacted me
jabout two months ago,
informing me of her very tough
decision to have stop cooking
'for us because of ongoing
health problems with her hands.
I'm sure that everyone from the
Safety Council will miss the
delicious contribution Betty has
given to us over approximately
15 years. j
THANK YOU
BETTYII
DON'T
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
FORGET TO
State Fair will s a wing the MN
year, be sure to stop
BRING A GUEST
land visit the State safety Council
booth.
TO THE AUG.
MEETING.
An appreciation gift will be
presented to Betty Johnson at the
August meeting 0oln us in sayingl
"thanks" for all she's done.
- Lunch for the August meeting wn
cost $4.90 per person, covers cost 01
sandwich, soup, and coffee.
- CONQRATULATIONS111 to Officer,
!Dave Mueller, for receiving an award
from the National Safety Council, for
the City of Hutchinson, for
recognition of his annual bike rodeo)
bike
•
• HUTCHINSON SAFETY COUNCIL
Name Address Phone number
John Arlt
111 Hassan St SE
234 -4228
Barry Anderson
101 Main St S
587 -7575
Dennis Asay
19874 Major Ave
587 -8510
Gale Boelter
531 Grove St SW
587 -9590
Bob Bowen
216 - 5th Av NE
587 -2750
Dave Conrad
100 Glen St SW
587 -2837
Jim Faber
317 Circle Drive SW
587 -4037
Jim Haasl
535 Lakewood Dr SW
587 -5535
Mark Hensen
111 Hassan St SE
234 -4220
Dick Higgins
12.10 Carolina Av NE
587 -3797
Duane Hoeschen
83 - 5th Av NE
587 -0772
Myron Johnson
907 Lewis Ave SW
587 -2692
Craig Johnson
237 - 4th Av NE
587 -9472
Larry Karg
111 Hassan St SE
587 -3771
• Tom Kloss
111 Hassan ST SE
234 -4245
Larry Ladd
965 Osgood Av SW
587 -3119
Les Linder
709 Madson Av SW
587 -2962
Dave Mueller
10 Franklin St SE
587 -2242
Jeff Nies
436 Monroe St SE
587 -7198
Loretta Pishney
380 Pishney Ln SW
587 -6828
John Reynolds
140 Illinois St NW
587 -3998
Carl Runke
17868 Noble Rd
587 -5148
Mark Schnobrich
111 Hassan St SE
234 -4459
Les Smith
346 Monroe St SE
587 -4663
Casey Stotts
111 Hassan St SE
234 -4211
Earl 'Taylor
1505 Hwy 22 S
587 -4434
Kay Peterson
16 Grove St S
587 -2348
Joyce Rix
1035 Texas Ave NW IOC
587 -2202
John Rodeberg
111 Hassan St SE
234 -4208
Vi Viesselman
23304 Twin Point Ave
587 -5763
June Wick
535 Main St S
587 -6248
Marilyn Swanson (city council secretary) I I I Hassan St SE 234 -4202
08.96
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING,
June 20, 1996
The PLS Board meeting was held at the Kandiyohi County Highway Department building in
Willmar. Meeting was called to order at 7:30 by President Orville Rudningen. Roll call
was given with __.g members present, 9 excused and a absent. The agenda was
approved as printed. McDonald/Dennis moved and seconded acceptance of Minutes of
May 16, 1996 meeting, approved
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Leroy Sanders gave the finance Committee report. Corrections were made to the April
1996 and May 1996 financial reports. M/S/P Sandets/G,abrielson to accept as corrected
The Revised 1996 budget was introduced. M/S/P Sanders/Schweiss to accept the revised
budget Director Houlahan explained the 1997 Budget and auditors recommendations.
M/S/P Sanders/Gabrielson accept budget as printed M /Si? Sanders/Canfield that we pay
the bill for Directors -and o$'ieers,insurance. M/S/P Sanders/Berg-Perry that we establish
a separate fund for Vacation/sick leave. Sanders explained the Service Center checking
account. $200 charge for a Genealogy research. M/S/P Gabrielson/Canfield that we
accept the report. M/SJ? Sanders /Anderson that we allow $3 sfor flowers for funeral of
Steve Boehlke, former chair ofPLB.
Ivev Vonderharr gave the Persomiel Committee report Mental health and chemical
dependency treatment must now be covered and there must be maternity coverage in our
health insurance. M/S/P Vonderha[r /Schweiss that we accept this change. Congress is
looking at $4.75 for minimum wage. M/S/P VonderharrrAnderson that we implement this
increase on the bottom step of the pay scale if and when its passed Marlene Canfield
accepted replacing Sheri Rudy on the Personnel committee and we welcome her.
Committee is reviewing.;nd updating the personnel policy. Recommend that there be a
workshop for all supervisors on hiring, discipline and termination of job and review the
new personal policy with them when it is completed
Orville Rudningen gave the Policy Committee report Amendments to the 1994
Agreement were approved at the May 16 meeting. 7 of the 17 cities and 1 of the 9
counties are left to comply with the Agreement
Dennis Hauer gave the Automation Committee report . John Houlahan explained the coat of
.installing the system and the Graut available. Each library will have 2 computers for
automation. Partial fimding for $705,000 project will be provided by $93,000 (taut
which we have alreadv received, $46.051 if averybodv participates. and $65,100 other.
Pioneer will be setting up internet in January 1997. We will get bids from Vendors and •
possibly select Co. in November then will be able to definitely state costs. Berg -Perry
explained the new brochure for PIS on -line 2000 with a time line for providing the
systems 31 libraries with on -line access. Demos commended Ramona for all her work in
revising and designing the brochure. M/S/P Hauer /Canfield that we send this out to all
cities and counties to approve this proposal implementing PLS On -line 2000.
Dennis Hauer gave the S%em Study Commfttee report The PLS Long Range Plan for
1997 -2001 was presented. M/S/P Sandem/Canfield that we accept this plan Kathy
explained the projected expenditures of the State and Federal and some of the Programs of
FY 1997 Regional Library Basic System Support Grouts and our application to participate
in the Regional Library Basic System Support Grant Program in Fiscal Year 1997. M./ST
Sanders/Berg -Perry accept report as printed M/S/P Sanders/Schweiss to authorize the
President to sign Grant agreements of (a) State and federal basic system support grants (b)
Librarians of Color grant, (e) Children's Library Services collaboration grants (PLS and
Bens9n Public Library) M/S/P Sanders/Berg -Pent' that we accept the reciprocal
borrowing agreement with State Library of Michigan. This is mostly for Genealogy
material. M /S/P Sanders/Canfield that we take membership in P.A.C.T. 4 Families •
collaborative.
John Houlahan and Kathy Matson gave the report of Director and Assistant Director.
John distribgeg995 Annual Statistical Report - Admin. Unit. The Summer 1996
library hours were given. Kathy announced all our libraries will be open at least 20 hours
per week. The Public Library Newsletter was distributed and the April and May 1996
circulation statistics were reviewed 80,332 articles were circulated in April and 75,487
in May by our 31 libraries.
OLD BUSINESS
M/S/P/ Sanders/Berg -Perry that we send a letter of appreciation to the Appleton prison for
the tour we had on May 16.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
The committee chaimm-aldgiam will meet July
The next Board meeting is Thursday, September 19,
Health & Human Services Building, Willmar.
Meeting adjourned 9:20.
18 at Simon's Restaurant at Willmar.
1996, 7:30 p.m., Kandiyohi county
n" All
Ivey Vond rharr. Secretary
0
0
6/20/96 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
PAGE 1
BALANCE SHEET
MAY 31, 1996
w ■ w • TOTAL • ■ • ■
ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT - AT COST
LAND 6 LAND RIGHTS
891,734.73
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT
32,469,811.32
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
33,361,346.27
LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(18,171,933.32)
_ _
- - _ - TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION -
(18,171,933.32)
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
161,177.69
_
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
161,177.69
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
33,330,770.44
RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
INVESTMENT - GAS RESERVES
738,426.33
MEDICAL INSURANCE - -- -
100,000.00..
BOND 6 INTEREST PAYMENT 1993
324,999.73
BOND RESERVE - 1993
1,3891320.00
- -- - -.- .._ .- - CATASTROPHIC FAILUN2£ FUND - .._.. _ _ - -
730,000.00 .
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
3,372,746.30
- CURRENT 8 ACCRUED ASSETS -
CASH IN BANK
1,493,931.73
INVESTMENTS 6 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
380,361.63
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1,8601369.91
INVENTORIES
737,618.33
PREPAID INSURANCE
48,163.78
MISC - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
79.48
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
4,720,747.12
DEFERRED CHARGE -
BOND DISCOUNT 1993
160,016.63
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE
160,016.63
TOTAL ASSETS
43,734,280.31
E
0 0
6/20/96 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
BALANCE SHEET
MAY 31, 1996
MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIABILITIES
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
LNJAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINGS
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY
LONG TERM LIABILITIES -HET OF
CURRENT MATURITIES
1993 BONDS
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
CONSTR CONTRACTS & ACCTS PAY RETAIN
ACCRUED EXPENSES - RETAINAGE _
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 6 ACCTS PAY
CURRENT 8 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
INTEREST ACCRUED
_ ACCRUED PAYROLL
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND
ACCRUED REC PAYMENT
CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
OTHER CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIAS
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY & LIAB
PAGE 2
• M w • TOTAL • ■ M w
28,894,611.41
(173,683.01)
28,718,928.40
i3,3OO1OOO.00
13,300,000.00
100,000.00
..
100,000.00 - -
1,254,290.74 - -- - --
(29.57)
41, 414.44
130,332.53
64,524.41
983.84
73.260.00 - ...
48,633.72
- _ -- -- .1.635, 332.11
43,754,280.31
0
7/26/96
0
HUTCHIW30N UTILITIES COMMISSION
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 1996
ASSETS
UTILITY PLANT - AT COST
LEWD Q LAND RIGHTS
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLEAT
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
TOTAL ACCUHULATED DEPRECIATION
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
INVESTMENT - GAS RESERVES
MEDICAL INSURANCE
BOND 6 INTEREST PAYMENT 1993
-- ---_ -_- _ BOND RESERVE - 1993
CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
., -- - - ---- - _, - - CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
CASH IN BANK
-- INVESTMENTS 6 SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
INVENTORIES
PREPAID INSURANCE
TOTAL CURRENT 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
_ DEFERRED CHARGE
BOND DISCOUNT 1993
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE
TOTAL ASSETS
PAGE 1
M w w w TOTAL « w • w
891,734.73
52,469,811.52
53,361,546.27
(18,292,988.52)
(18,292,988.52)
223,749.91
223,749.91
35,292,307.66
758,426.55
100,000.00
665,781.00
11389,320.00
7550,000.00
3,663,527.55
1,196,611.51
588,768.39
1,854,068.12
899,236.94
32,690.48
4,571,375.44
158,612.99
158,612.99
43,685,823.64
C�
i
,
7/26/96 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION
BALANCE SHEET
JUNE 30, 1996
MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIABILITIES
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
UNAPPROPRIATED RETAINED EARNINCS
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY
LONG TERM LIABILITIES —WT OF
CURRENT MATURITIES
1993 BONDS
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
CONSTR CONTRACTS 8 ACCTS PAY RETAIN
_- ACCRUED EXPENSES — RETAINAGE
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 8 ACCTS PAY
CURRENT 8 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
INTEREST ACCRUED
_ ___ - -- -- ACCRUED PAYROLL
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
ACCRUED MEDICAL. FUND
-_ -. - ACCRUED REC PAYMENT
CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
OTHER CURRENT Q ACCRUED LIABILITIES
TOTAL CURRENT & ACCRUED LIAB
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIAB
PAGE 2
• w w• TOTAL r w w r
28,894,611.41
125,468.80
29,020,080.21
131300 1 000. 00
13,300,000.00
100,000.00
:e e0: ee
867,865.83
55,241.57
40,929.02
150,332.53
67,143.21
1,183.28
73,125.00
9,922.99
1,265,743.43
43,685,823.64
u
OPERATING EXPENSES
PRODUCTION OPERATION
STATEMENT
OF INCOMOEXF'ENSES
441,816.00
1,927.05
1,160,015.00
PRODUCTION MAINTGNAN't'
135,648.26
MAY 31, 6
251,435.00
(1UB,776.49)
•
PURCHASED POWER
PREVIOUS
CURRENT
BUDGETED
BUDGET
ANNUAL
TRANSMISSION OPERATION
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
YEAR TO DATE
DEVIATION
BUDGET
INCOME STATEMENT
4,330.39
11,043.21
11,020.00
(23.21)
29,000.00
OPERATING REVENUE
106,947.85
88,516.07
90,448.00
1,931.93
217,000.00
SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY
4,342,222.33
4,562,472.64
4,271,800.00
290,672.64
11,000,000.00
SALES FOR RESALE
14,186.00
222,400.50
100,000.00
122,400.50
i00,000.00
NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES
18,588.32
17,674.11
22,170.00
(4,495.89)
54,000.00
SECURITY LIGHTS
4,542.00
5,400.50
5,460.00
(59.50)
14,000.00
POLE RENTAL
.00
1,657.25
.00
1,657.25
4,000.00
SALES - GAS
2,302,340.75
2,902,815.71
2,541,600.00
361,215.71
5,600,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
6,681,879.40
7,712,420.71
6,941,030.00
771,390.71
16,772,000.00
OPERATING EXPENSES
PRODUCTION OPERATION
395,229.74
439,868.95
441,816.00
1,927.05
1,160,015.00
PRODUCTION MAINTGNAN't'
135,648.26
360,211.49
251,435.00
(1UB,776.49)
303,500.00
PURCHASED POWER
2,084,964.85
1,516,657.53
1,476,860.00
(39,797.53)
2,099,650.00
TRANSMISSION OPERATION
95.82
.00
.00
.00
3,400.00
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE
4,330.39
11,043.21
11,020.00
(23.21)
29,000.00
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
106,947.85
88,516.07
90,448.00
1,931.93
217,000.00
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
68,136.12
104,398.92
89,940.00
(14,458.92)
150,900.00
MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION
271.50
627.04
310.00
(317.04)
11000.00
MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
703.73
38.50
1,000.00
961.50
2,000.00
PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE
2,458,061.22
3,714,669.39
3,001,844.90
(712,824.49)
7,960,790.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
103,406.72
88,095.03
101,275.00
13,179.97
226,000.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
18,024.40
28,283.73
18,6i9.00
(9,664.73)
49,400.00
CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING &COLLECTIONS
90,634.92
83,868.10
82,288.00
(3,580.10)
198,800.00
ADMINISTRATIVE 4 GENERAL EXPENSES
642,285.95
549,509.45
554,611.48
5,102.03
1,473,056.00
DEPRECIATION
724,999.50
605,175.00
751,800.00
146,625.00
1,790,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES-
6,833,740.97
7,592,982.41
6,873,267.38
(719,715.03)
i5,664,5ii.00
OPERATING INCOME
(151,861.57)
119,438.30
67,762.62
51,675.68
1,107,489.00
OTHER INCOME
OTHER - NET
13,364.45
8,832.00
23,150.00
(14,318.00)
125,000.00
INTEREST INCOME
87,049.94
83,339.63
90,300.00
(6,960.37)
210,000.00
MISC INCOME
30,635.64
75,478.21
23,534.00
51,944.21
28,700.00
GAIN ON DISPOSAL
.00
.00
.00
.00
1,500.00
MISC INCOME - GAS
102,490.33
110,018.23
118,500.00
(8,481.77)
395,000.00
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
233,540.36
277,668.07
255,484.00
22,184.07
760,200.00
OTHER EXPENSES
DEPLETION - GAS WELLS
.00
.00
.GO
.00
125,000.00
MISC EXPENSES
19,495.58
25,133.13
21,120.00
(4,013.13)
72,000.00
INTEREST EXPENSE
272,605.00
266,406.25
267,592.50
1,186.25
640,875.00
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
292,100.58
291,539.38
288,712.50
(2,826.88)
837,875.00
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
162,500.00
281,250.00
283,500.00
2,250.00
675,000.00
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
162,500.00
281,250.00
263,500.00
2,250.00
675,000.00
NON-OPERATING INCOME
(221,060.22)
(295,121.31)
(316,728.50)
21,607.19
(752,675.00)
NET INCOME (372,921.79) (175,683.01) (248,965.88) 73,282.87 354,814.00
..
- —. ..._.. ... ..oa.. .. r
r.HbG 1
STATEMENT
OF INC 6 EXPENSES
•
JUNE 340 996
PREVIOUS
CURRENT
BUDGETED
BUDGET
ANNUAL
YEAR TO DATE
- ------- --- ---
YEAR TO DATE
--------------
YEAR TO DATE
------ - ---- --
DEVIATION
------ -- - - - ---
BUDGET
--------------
STATEMENT
OPERATING REVENUE
SALES - ELECTRIC ENERGY
5,247,879.77
5,543,171.62
5,186,000.00
357,171.62
11,000,000.00
SALES FOR RESALE
14,486.00
230,338.00
100,000.00
130,338.00
100,000.00
NET INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES
21,953.81
22,539.72
26,400.00
(3,860.28)
54,000.00
SECURITY LIGHTS
5,452.00
6,474.50
61580.00
(105.50)
14,000.00
POLE RENTAL
1,293.25
1,657.25
4,000.00
(2,342.75)
4,000.00
SALES - GAS
2,598,146.08
3,267,280.10
2,878,100.00
389,180.10
5,600,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE
7,889,210.91
9,071,461.19
8,201,080.00
870,381.19
16,772,000.00
OPERATING EXPENSES
PRODUCTION OPERATION
484,056.45
527,868.10
538,103.35
10,235.25
1,160,015.00
PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
153,613.38
406,956.56
256,715.00
(150,241.56)
303,500.00
PURCHASED POWER
2,241,307.68
1,575,287.37
1,476,860.00
(98,427.37)
2,099,650.00
TRANSMISSION OPERATION
95.82
.00
.00
.00
3,400.00
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE
4,959.54
14,454.40
15,530.00
1,095.60
29,000.00
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
126,255.10
103,650.41
103,875.00
224.59
217,000.00
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
75,078.58
109,898.12
L03, 665.00
(6,233.12)
150,900.00
MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION
271.50
627.04
310.00
(317.04)
1,000.00
MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
703.73
38.50
1,000.00
961.50
2.000.00
PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE
3,118,343.52
4,250,335.30
3,804,855.30
(445,479.80)
7,960,790.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
119,809.17
106,668.79
117,350.00
10,681.21
226,000.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
20 ,474.30
30,810.70
21,640.00
(9,170.70)
49,400.00
CUSTOMER ACCOUNTING 8 COLLECTIONS
106,833.22
1(10,652.12
96,671.00
(3,981.12)
198,800.00
ADMINISTRATIVE 6 GENERAL EXPENSES
759,985.42
636,870.21
676,306.74
39,436.53
1,473,056.00
DEPRECIATION _
869,999.40
726,210.00
895,000.00
168,790.00
11790,000.00
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
8,081,786.81
8,590,327.62
8,107,901.59
(482,426.03)
15,664,511.00
OPERATING INCOME
(192,575.90)
481,133.57
93,178.41
387,955.16
1,107,489.00
OTHER INCOME
OTHER - NET
15,254.42
27,978.84
25,750.00
2,228.84
125,000.00
INTEREST INCOME
101,935.07
98,979.09
107,100.00
(8,120.91)
210,000.00
MISC INCOME
42,i6B.35
75,688.79
23,534.00
32,154.79
28,700.00
GAIN ON DISPOSAL_
.00
.00
.00
.00
1,300.00
MISC INCOME - GAS
125,456.31
142,196.22
1971300.00
(55,303.78)
395,000.00
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
284,834.15
344,842.94
353,584.00
(9,041.06)
760,200.00
OTHER EXPENSES
DEPLETION - GAS WELLS
.00
.00
.00
.00
125,000.00
MISC EXPENSES
23,423.62
40,819.03
25,300.00
(15,519.05)
72,000.00
INTEREST EXPENSE
329,652.58
322,LB8.66
320,475.00
(1,713.66)
640,875.00
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
353,076.20
363,007.71
345,773.00
(17,232.71)
837,875.00
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
325,000.00
337,500.00
337,500.00
.00
675,000.00
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
325,000.00
337,500.00
337,500.00
.00
675,000.00
NON -OPERATING INCOME
(393,242.05)
(355,664.77)
(329,391.00)
(26,273.77)
(752,675,00)
_T INCOME
(585,517.95)
125,468.80
(236,212.59)
361,681.39
354,814.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JULY 1995
MISC.
TOTAL
TOTAL
BY WEEK
561
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JULY 19%
JULY
805
357
8,160
TOTAL
JULY
22,758
1995
LIQUOR BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1996
LIQUOR BEER
1
4,187
9,034
1,591
173
14,985
1
2,006
3,801
5,013
340
227
4,608
14,985
2
2,043
4,955
3
3,941
8,757
1,470
642
14,810
12.412
3
5,707
14,037
4
HOLIDAY
0
442
4
1,747
4,853
5
1,763
2,145
489
208
4,605
6.625
5
3.602
6,880
6
2,357
3,560
624
289
6,830
1,275
6
2,964
6,573
7
3,117
6,139
1,008
621
10,885
5,499
395
298
8
2,927
6,234
836
697
10,694
669
8
1,591
2,664
1,538
668
13,475
940
730
47,624
9
1,306
2,735
10
1,500
2,964
350
255
5,069
418
10
1,511
3,232
11
2,136
3,319
532
353
6,340
11
2,394
3,581
12
1,618
3,885
437
432
6,372
9
12
3.481
6,946
13
2,236
4,875
690
502
8,303
13
3,355
7,151
14
2,835
6,829
804
665
11,133
15
3,157
5,874
1,188
738
10,957
15
1,894
3.049
48,174
16
1,330
3,468
17
1,475
2,659
462
242
4,838
17
1.744
4.005
18
1,318
2,474
369
279
4,440
18
2,255
4,763
19
1,584
3,241
549
236
5,610
19
3,481
7,917
20
1,741
4,176
639
2,259
8,815
20
3,220
7,795
21
2,851
7,244
1,236
511
11,842
22
3,097
6,111
860
800
10,868
22
1,749
2,952
46,413
23
1,299
2,979
24
1,362
2,680
423
551
5,036
24
1,470
3,005
25
1,099
2,273
430
248
4,050
25
2,382
4,566
26
1,465
3,601
448
346
5,860
26
3,445
7,824
27
1,865
3,919
486
328
6,598
27
3,207
6,628
28
3,675
7,616
1,062
842
13,195
29
1,880
3,773
29
3,553
7,622
1,380
997
13,552
48.291
30
1,415
3,479
31
1,719
2,394
238
201
4,552
4,552
31
1,909
4,357
TOTAL
58,598
119,625
18,601
13,415
210,239
TOTAL
64,387
137,968
94 TOTALS
53,667
102,756
15,351
8,828
180,602
95 TOTAL
58,598
119,625
% OF SALE
28
57
9
6
100
% OF SAL
27
58
SALES INC
OR DEC
29,637
16
%
SALES INC OR DEC
VINE
MISC.
TOTAL
TOTAL
BY WEEK
561
299
6,667
805
357
8,160
2,106
908
22,758
594
524
7.718
1.252
586
12.320
990
778
11,305
68,928
544
214
5,013
340
227
4,608
492
262
5,497
691
257
6,923
1,152
833
12.412
1.257
835
12,598
47,051
442
321
5,706
488
242
5,528
556
320
6.625
702
396
8,116
1,164
736
13.298
1,275
940
13,230
52,505
488
310
5,499
395
298
4,971
412
263
5,150
669
482
8,099
1,538
668
13,475
940
730
11,505
48.699
510
308
6,471
418
283
5,595
515
334
7.115
19,181
21.296
12,713
236,364
18,601
13,415
210,239
9
5
100
26,125
12
%
me. 16:3162,
'LIQUOR MONTH OF:
HUTCH' JULY, 96
'te�D Glue vaSCr:Ct ion
DEPTNO - iBEER)
Lollat 612 SCbtc C3;5—i
,cunt 9sg Subtotai =-
DEPT% - -:: 5 (ICE)
Laint Z Subtntai
DEPTIO —i 9 (RENTALf
Gout 2 Subtota,
DUN] 10 (TOBXM FR30f'Si
Count 260 Subtotals -->
DEPTNO - 91 iMI BttRl
Dout 1 Subtotals - ->
91 (MISC LlDffT
C: -sent 1 Subtotal
DEP?Q 92 (MISC WINE)
,-sun` I Subtotals —;
DEPTNO - -; 41 (?.'Sr' 6.1.X1
07uat 332 Sub;otals—
Cant 3191 Totals —)
I*
� of 9 --F! •.756
8813 560,`.14
- -20760 70706.40
9tY
6958
15361
419;
1549
91
'GARY'
-- - Mcn"h to
- -- :oat ,ar -- --
4v7r,�,2: 795.65
t;�756.49 562.95
1397e.171 — 426 -9=
3t2.75
tats Sal -- - --- - --
- ,P
&3W. 81
1374071.46 27646X ni.1
- 81869. ^19 - -be9l 33 -0
2 99.55 tS8 .81 86.4
1.1.0.'. 121,01
23•')1 544x, =,96 te'N1 3754'.62 61.26 5069.:1 17t�9.58 25.5
rw=
tr�t�
- -5061 -- 751).69
t(0 N227.66
}.:'q 4784..)
--
28.4
62VA 3W', .711
31%9 IGOK6.SJ
1627.9: 2'.1519.64
5•77582.74
22.5
Data:
'YEAR -TO -DATE'
Paya:
-ez i.6a Descriution
24873
88854.67
,uot 10;;
tt
p&bbt,ctals
'.'cant 6ic
Subtotal;--,,
DEPTte --
3 (WINE)
Cwnt 949
Subtotals —±
DEPTNO - ->
5 (ia)
Count 3
subtotals
aEPTNO - ->
9 (RENTAL)
Cunt 2
Subtotals )
DEPTIC - -)
10 (TOBACCO PRODIXTS)
Scant 2u)
Subtotals - ;
DEPTNO - -)
90 (MI.SC BEERi
Count 1
Subtotals -)
YPTNO -:, 91 (MISC L:Alx3R)
unt 1
scbtotal; - -:
DEPRC - -; 92 (MISC WINE)
xmt 1
subtatals -
:EPTNO -; 93 (MISC 6.58)
a I C, -
4
f SGrtS: L{PTNJ
/kangas: DEPTP)0
5aawar.r: Ye;
— rear to Cate Sales - - - -- -- -- --
Gust 4moDwns ,ale Pr-3f Its ;
- - - - - --- _
- - --- --- --- - - - - - -- -- - - --
25391 165366.12 40663 305.x8.76 4134.22 390029.66 84690.9<)
9873 56075,14 83999 563995.94 :480.76 7t TOZ,93 I5 307.99 21.
i')7 &) 70'08.40 --
24873
88854.67
2629.42 132706,32
4.36,45.70
3.,.,
4707
ICA6.15 -
- - - -- - 6816.35
5770.2(1
84.7
Ml
.301 5=4:) .96 - 9168 ;94:19.23 3 ".78 - M75.29 6466.;:, 25,5
atxar 0
+retir
Yj61 7510,69 9915 16974.24 ;21.99 23728.24 6754.CmD 28,5
:ant 3191 Totals —i -- - --- -- -- --- --- ---
614,'l6 3CM01.31 174146 995118.94 10094.23 1297283( 302164,91 3
91