cp08-12-1997 cAUGUST
1997
HUTCHIlVSON
CITY
CALENDAR
WEEK OF
August 10 to Au ust 1
SUNDAY
-10-
MONDAY
-11-
10:00 a.m. - McLeod Regional Rail
Authority & Shippers Assoc.
Meeting in City Center Main
Conference Room
3:00 p.m. - HATS Joint Powers
Board Meeting at HATS
Facility
5:30 p.m. - Light Traffic Advisory
Board Meeting in Main
Conference Room
TUESDAY
-12-
5:30 p.m. - City Council Meeting at
City Center Council
Chambers
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
1
-13-
- 14-
- 15-
-16-
9:00 a.m. - Directors Meeting in
Staff Conference Room
10:00 a.m. -1:00 P.M. - Suite
Package Comparison
Presentation in Council
Chambers
CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/
VACATION
8/11 -22 Gary D. Plotz (V)
8/11 -15 Jim Marka (V)
8/11 -15 Dick Nagy (V)
8/14 -22 Randy DeVries (V)
C
= Conference
S
= Seminar
V
= Vacation
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 1997
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 P.M.
INVOCATION - Rev. Max Myers, Riverside Assembly of God Church
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES
MINUTES OF JULY 22, 1997
Action - approve as presented - approve as amended
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. SENIOR ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF MAY 19, 1997
2. HUTCHINSON LIGHT TRAFFIC ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF
JUNE 2, 1997 AND JULY 21, 1997
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. RESOLUTION NO. 10872 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
2. RESOLUTION NO. 10873 - RESOLUTION ADDING PLEDGED
SECURITIES WITH CITIZENS BANK OF HUTCHINSON, MN
3. RESOLUTION NO. 10851 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND
AWARDING CONTRACT, LETTING NO. I l/PROJECT NO. 97 -29
4. ORDINANCE NO. 97 -201 - AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO INCLUDE
CERTAIN LAND OWNED BY MAE A. JENSEN AND JULIE M. JENSEN
TO AND ABUTTING THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON PURSUANT TO
MINNESOTA STATUTES 414.033, SUBDIVISION 2(2) , 2(B) (SECOND
READING AND ADOPT)
5. ORDINANCE NO. 97 -202 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPBELL LAKE
ADDITION (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
6. ORDINANCE NO. 97 -203 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO AL AND
VIRGINIA KRAMER AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS,
CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
• (c) EXTENSION OF THREE YEAR CONTRACT WITH CITY AUDITING FIRM,
ABDO ABDO EICK & MEYERS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 12, 1997
• (d) GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE FOR HUTCHINSON HOCKEY ASSOCIATION
AT JONNY'S RESTAURANT & LOUNGE
Action - Motion to approve consent agenda
5. PUBLIC .ARIN , - NONE
6. COMMUNICATIONS REQUESTS AND PETITIONS - NONE
(a) UPDATE ON HAYDEN /OSGOOD PROJECT BY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
Action -
(b) STAFF COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING
STATUS OF ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR POSITION
STATUS OF TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND OPEN HOUSE
DISCUSSION OF CITY STAFF STATUS AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIR
Action -
(c) PRESENTATION REGARDING REFERENDUM PROPOSAL BY MICHAEL
RIBICH AND MICHAEL CAMPA, REPRESENTING "PEOPLE ADVOCATING
• RESPONSIBLE TAXATION"
Action -
7. UNFINISHED BUSINE - NONE
8. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING PROCEDURAL GUIDE FOR ADAMS
STREET NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION PROJECT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 10874
(b) CONSIDERATION OF 1998 MEMBERSHIP IN COALITION OF GREATER
MINNESOTA CITIES
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(c) CONSIDERATION OF BUS PURCHASE FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(d) CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL PAVING FOR CEMETERY
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
L
2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - AUGUST 12, 1997
• (e) CONSIDERATION OF PROPERTY ACQUISITION FOR IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
► FIFTH AVENUE SE BRIDGE AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
(LETTING NO. 3, PROJECT NO. 97 -08)
► NORTH - CENTRAL TRUNK SANITARY SEWER
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 10875 &
No. 10876
(f) CONSIDERATION OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND SUBDIVISION
AGREEMENT FOR ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION (SCENIC
HEIGHTS INVESTMENTS) (LETTING NO. IO/PROJECT NO. 97 -28)
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 10877 -
No.10880
(g) DISCUSSION OF ADOPTING "MODEL RIGHT -OF -WAY ORDINANCE"
Action -
(h) CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR BUDGET
DISCUSSION ON AUGUST 26, 1997 AT 4:00 P.M.
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve
(i) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING
COMMISSION TO RETURN TO SEVEN MEMBER BOARD
Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve - Motion to waive first reading of
Ordinance No. 97 -204 and set second reading for August 26, 1997
9. MISCELLANEOUS
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
10. CLAIMS APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
Action - Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds
0
3
0
Senior Advisory Board Minutes
Monday, May 19, 1997
Members Present: Les Smith, Lorin Pollman, Bob Meyers, Teresa Hatten, John
Aul
Members Absent: Harriet Wixcey and Loretta Pishney
Chair Leslie Smith called the meeting to order at 9:30 a.m. Minutes from the
March 17th meeting were read and approved. Treasurer Arnold Rotzien is ill and
suggests that it may be a long -term situation. The Board recommended that a
temporary replacement for the position of Treasurer be named. The Board voted
unanimously to name John Aul as treasurer until further notice.
City Finance Director, Ken Merrill, could not attend the meeting as planned, so the
Board will table discussion regarding the Building Fund.
• Staff discussed the benefits of formal recognition of volunteers and that an in -house
record - keeping of all volunteers hours be kept. It was reported that a local chapter
of AARP may be started up again in Hutchinson. The Board expressed concern
over co- sponsoring the chapter, that it could be repetitive programming, therefore
competing with Senior Center programs. The Board advised staff to proceed
cautiously.
Staff informed the Board regarding. Older American's Month and the special.
activities the Center was offering.
The Board requested that staff look into into improved signage for the Senior
Center entrance; the current signs do not identify the entrance well enough.
Staff reported on current and upcoming fund- raisers; the Leader Project, Helmet
Survey, the Popcorn Wagon and the Pool Concessions are major fund- raising
projects for 1997.
The Senior Advisory Board will make plans to tour one or two Senior Centers in
• early June. The meeting was adjourned at 11:15 a.m.
HUTCHINSON LIGHT TRAFFIC ADVISORY BOARD
1•
MINUTES
Members present: Rick Larson, Lucille Smith, Archie Woodworth, Richard Paxton, Brian Bonte and
Ed Doring
Members absent: Dave Conrad, Leslie Smith and Dave Radloff
Staff present: John Rodeberg, Dave Mueller and Bonnie Baumetz
Chairman Rick Larson opened the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
I. REVIEW COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS ON THE STRIPING PROJECT FOR
JEFFERSON ST., LINDEN AVE. AND DALE ST.
John Rodeberg reported staff will take another look at the striping proposed for Jefferson St. but do
propose the Linden Ave. and Dale St. striping. Ed Doring made a motion to recommend support for
the striping on Linden Ave. and Dale St. and review the Jefferson St. proposal in July, seconded by
Brian Bonte the motion carried unanimously.
H. UPDATE ON THE PRESENTATION BY MR. TOM GOTTFRIED
Bonnie Baumetz reported that Brenda Ewing will contact Mr. Gottfried for a presentation on July
21. 1997.
Monday, June 2, 1997
5:30 p.m.
Hutchinson City Center
M. OTHER ITEMS
Dave Mueller stated he will research policy and standards for the City to set regarding in-
line skating.
The following Craig Ave. residents were present to discuss the possible bike /ped path to be
proposed on Aveyron Home property:
Mary and Bill Carlson
Kirk Larson
Becky Jo Schmidt
Mike and Karen Shaw
Bruce Precht
Jennifer and Eugene S1
774 Craig Ave.
804 Craig Ave.
824 Craig Ave.
754 Craig Ave.
775 Craig Ave.
)eiser 814 Craig Ave
Don Lickfelt 745 Craig Ave.
Curt and Lois Asche 764 Craig Ave.
Dean and Ruth Gauer 755 Craig Ave.
Scott Powers 765 Craig Ave.
G.F. and Olive Goldschmidt 904 Craig Ave.
Terry Ruble 805 Craig Ave.
Deanna Puchalski 914 Craig Ave.
Mary Carlson was the spokesperson for the residents on Craig Ave. She presented a number
of concerns they have regarding the proposal of a bike path down their street. She also
presented a letter from Ms. Vicki Powers, a resident who was unable to attend the meeting.
John Rodeberg explained the route is being looked at because of access, safety issues and
•
background given by MnDot and the origin destination study. He stated the City has not yet
• made a determination if this will actually be the route but at this time there is an opportunity
to purchase an easement on the Aveyron Home property which may not be available in the
future. John again stated there are no plans at this time to construct the path, only to
purchase the easement for the possibility in the future.
Lois Asche, 764 Craig Ave., voiced her concern with having no input by the residents in the
event the path would be constructed. Another resident is concerned their property values
will decrease.
Ms. Carlson stated the residents want this stopped and will work toward that goal. John
Rodeberg explained he is looking at the city as a whole for the best and safest routes to
connect the school property to the Recreation Center property.
Ed Doring commented that city staff are trying to find the best way to get bicycle and
pedestrian traffic through the city. He stated we do not know at this time if the easement
will ever be used. Ed also noted the safety of individuals crossing streets at controlled
intersections.
John stated there is a possiblity of hiring a 3rd party consultant to give recommendation and
direction as to the best routes to consider.
Richard Paxton and Rick Larson both made traffic counts in the area and reported their
findings.
• Discussion followed on the possibility of hiring an outside consultant to determine a safe
route connecting the schools with the recreation center. It would be important to include
the residents in the meetings.
The consensus of the Light Traffic Advisory Board is to work with the residents and not to
construct a trail without input of the Craig Ave. residents but to purchase an easement across
the Aveyron property located at 851 Dale St., to protect the property for potential trail
crossing to connect Dale St. to Craig Ave.
IV. NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be held July 21, 1997, 5:30 p.m. in the Main Conference room at the City
Center. Agenda items for the meeting will be 1) presentation by Tom Gottfried, 2) review Jefferson
St. striping, 3) begin reviewing the standard and policy regarding in -line skating.
V. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
CJ
• HUTCHINSON LIGHT TRAFFIC ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES
Monday, July 21, 1997
5:30 p.m.
Members Present: Dave Conrad, Rick Larson, Lucille Smith, Ed Doring, Kay Peterson Archie
Woodworth
Members Absent: Richard Paxton, Dave Radloff, Les Smith, Brian Bonte
Staff Present: John Rodeberg, Dolf Moon, Dave Mueller, Bonnie Baumetz
I. COMMENTS FROM RESIDENTS ON THE STRIPING PROJECT PROPOSED FOR
JEFFERSON ST.
John Rodeberg commented on the revised proposal for striping of bike lanes on Jefferson St. with
no parking proposed for the west side of Jefferson St. from Washington Ave. to 5th Ave. and no
parking on the east side of Jefferson St. from 5th Ave. to Century Ave. He also commented on the
concerns expressed by 4 residents on Jefferson explaining their concerns can be dealt with
satisfactorily. John asked the Light Traffic Advisory Board to give a recommendation of support
for the bike lane to the City Council.
Ed Doring made a motion to recommend approval of the proposal, seconded by Lucille Smith the
• motion carried unanimously.
II. REVIEW THE BIKE/PED PATH TO CRAIG AVE. DISCUSSED ON JUNE 2ND
Rick Larson commented on the informational meeting held on June 2nd and the emotions that
surfaced. John Rodeberg stated SRF Consultants have been hired to review the route and will
initiate suggestions as to the most appropriate placement of a route crossing Dale. SRF Consultants
will be in Hutchinson to review their findings with the Board on August 5th at 5:00 p.m.
M. REVIEW THE STANDARD AND POLICY REGARDING IN -LINE SKATING
Dave Mueller distributed a draft ordinance created with input by the downtown business owners.
He stated State Law is to ban bicycling and in -line skating on downtown sidewalks.
Discussion followed on the draft. The Board asked for a better definition of "Downtown Business
District' and to simplify the definition of "bicycle ". They also discussed Subdivision 2 to add
permitting of walking bicycles on the downtown sidewalks. Dave will make the changes and bring
the draft back to the board next month. He stated beginning next Spring there will be media
coverage, education in the classrooms and signs to educate the community on the ordinance and also
the crosswalk laws.
Discussion followed on the crosswalk laws and Dave will contact the newspaper to do an article on
the new ordinance, bike patrol and crosswalks.
• In -line skates will follow the bicycle rules and regulations also.
A (z)
. Dave stated the Downtown Business owners will provide bike racks and better lighting in the back
of their businesses.
IV. OTHER ITEMS
A. TOM GOTTFRIED PRESENTATION WELL BE ON AUGUST 11, 1997
Tom will be present on August 11, 1997, for a 45 minute presentation on transit.
V. NEXT MEETING
Tuesday, August 5th, 1997, 5:00 p.m. a special meeting with SRF Consulting.
Monday, August 11, 1997, 5:30 p.m. regular Light Traffic Advisory Board. Agenda items will
include: 1) Presentation by Mr. Tom Gottfried, 2) Review of SRF recommendations and 3)
Ordinance review.
VL ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
cc: Dolf Moon
John Rodeberg
• Dave Mueller
Brenda Ewing
U
C
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Resolution Establishing Location of Traffic Control Devices
DATE: August 7, 1997
The attached resolution officially establishes the location of traffic control required
for the previously approved bike lane improvements.
We also need to discuss the potential for creating a 4 -way stop at Oakland Avenue
and Jefferson Street. This has been discussed in the past, and was in place during
construction in the area. Since this route is heavily used by 3M traffic at shift time,
and has a high accident rate (9 in 1996), Steve Madson and I would strongly
recommend consideration of this traffic control device.
• City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Hutchinson,,VN 55350.3097 Hutchinson,.NN 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -5151 (320) 587 -2975 (320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 2344240 Fax (320) 2344240 � —� Fax (320) 587 -6427
- Printed on recycled paper -
RESOLUTION NO. 10872
• RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering/Public Works and the Police Chief agree that the
following areas have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and;
WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locations as points where
traffic control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1 of the Hutchinson City
Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
14UTCHINSON:
That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control device known as a "NO PARKING" sign shall
be erected at the following locations:
1. On the east side of Jefferson Street between Century Avenue SE and 5th Avenue SE
2. On the west side of Jefferson Street between 5th Avenue SE and Washington Avenue
3. On the south side of Linden Avenue SW between Dale Street and Lynn Road
4. On the east side of Dale Street between Jull Road and Linden Avenue
• That the Council hereby establishes that a traffic control device known as a "BIICE LANE" sign shall be
erected at the following locations:
1. On Roberts Road between Dale Street SW and School Road SW
2. On Jefferson Street between Century Avenue and Washington Avenue E
3. On Linden Avenue between Dale Street SW and Lynn Road
4. On Dale Street between Linden Avenue and Roberts Road SW
Adopted this 12th day of August, 1997 by the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota.
Mayor - Marlin Torgerson
City Administrator - Gary D. Plotz
•
RTESOLUT�TRAFF ICTRAFCO 19RES
• RESOLUTION NO. 1087
AUTHORIZING SUBSTITUTION OF PLEDGED SECURITIES
FROM CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO., HUTCHINSON, MN
WHEREAS, Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of Hutchinson, Minnesota,
a city depository, has requested substitution of the following
security under the collateral agreement with the City of
Hutchinson:
Pledge of:
Fed Natl Mtg Association 11 -24 -99 $1,000,000.00
(cusip 31364BPYO)
Release of:
Freddie Mac Step Up 08 -04 -97 $ 500,000.00
( cusip 313400vw0)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
• MINNESOTA:
THAT the City Finance Director be authorized to release the
requested securities.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
•
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 10851
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO. 11 /PROJECT NO. 97.29
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the
improvement of North High Drive NW /TH 15 by construction of Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Upgrade and
appurtenances. and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received
complying with the advertisement:
Bidder Amount Bid
Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson MN 555,586.00
PCS, Allied Mechanical Systems of Hutchinson MN $77,991.00
Great Western Corp. of Forest Lake MN $99,000.00
and whereas, it appears that Juul Contracting of Hutchinson, MN is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Juul
Contracting Company of Hutchinson, MN, in the amount of $55,586.00, in the name of the City of Hutchinson,
for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City
Council and on file in the office of the Director of Engineering.
2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
• deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory
completion of the contract.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of August, 1997
City Administrator
Mayor
•
4-6(3)
PUBLICATION NO.
• ORDINANCE NO. 97 -201
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO INCLUDE
CERTAIN LAND OWNED BY MAE A. JENSEN AND JULIE M. JENSEN TO AND ABUTTING THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES 414.033, SUBDIVISION 2 (2),2(b)
WHEREAS, Mae A. Jensen and Julie M. Jensen have filed a petition dated June 10, 1997, requesting
that certain land, as legally described below:
Lot five (5) of the Auditor's Plat of the West Half (W 12) of Section Thirty -two (32), Township One Hundred
Seventeen (117), Range Twenty-nine (29)
be annexed to the City of Hutchinson, and
WHEREAS, Mae A. Jensen and Julie M. Jensen, represent that they are the sole owners of the property, that
the property is unincorporated, abuts the limits of the City of Hutchinson, is not included within any other municipality,
is not included in any area that has already been designated for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
414.0325, and is approximately 28.56 acres in size.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota does hereby ordain:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby determines and finds that the property abuts the municipality, that
the area to be annexed is 60 acres or less, that the property is not included in any area that has already been
designated for orderly annexation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 414.0325, that the municipality has received
a properly prepared Petition for Annexation from all of the owners of the property, and that the Petition
complies with all of the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 414.033, Subdivision 2b.
SECTION 2. The property is urban in nature or about to become so.
SECTION 3. The corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson are hereby extended to include the Property
and the same is hereby annexed to and included within the City of Hutchinson as if the property had originally
been part thereof.
SECTION 4. The City Administrator is directed to file certified copies of this ordinance with the
Minnesota Municipal Board, Hutchinson Township, the McLeod County Auditor, and the Minnesota Secretary
of State.
SECTION 5. This ordinance takes effect upon its passage and publication and the filing of the certified
copies as directed in Section 4 and approval of the Ordinance by the Minnesota Municipal Board.
Adopted this 12th day of August, 1997.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
u
4_//, ��)
• PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -202
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
LOCATED ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CAMPBELL LAKE ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
S ection I Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made
and was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interests
of the City to vacate the drainage and utility easement located on Lot 1, Block 1, Campbell Lake
Addition.
Se ction 2. That the drainage and utility easement to be vacated are described as follows:
The southerly 15' of the 30' easement along the northerly line
of Lot 1, Block 1, Campbell Lake Addition
• Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
ATTEST:
Crary D. Plotz
City Administrator
•
ORDINANCE NO. 97- 203, 2 N D SERIES
PUBLICATION NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, GRANTING A
FRANCHISE TO AL AND VIRGINIA KRAMER AND ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE
CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99, WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. Al and Virginia Kramer are the owner in fee simple of certain real estate located within the
City of Hutchinson.
Section 2. The owner of the above described property desires to secure from the City of Hutchinson an
easement for access purposes and the City of Hutchinson is willing to grant said easement.
Section 3. Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was
made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to grant a
franchise for said easement covering the following described real estate:
That part of Washington Avenue, NORTH HALF HUTCHINSON, according to the recorded plat
thereof, described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 48, NORTH HALF HUTCHINSON; thence North
89 degrees 31 minutes 14 seconds East (assumed bearing) 82.00 feet along the south line of said Lot 6;
thence South 0 degrees, 28 minutes 59 seconds East 0.76 feet; thence South 89 degrees 18 minutes 39
minutes West 82.00 feet; thence North 0 degrees 28 minutes 59 seconds West 1.06 feet to the point of
• beginning.
Section 4. This franchise is subject to the requirements of the Hutchinson City Charter and the franchise
and associated easement shall expire twenty (20) years from the date of publication hereof. Franchisee shall not
acquire, at any tire, rights as against the City by way of prescriptive easement, adverse possession or in any other
manner. .
Section 5. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire
City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and section 2.99 entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby
adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this _ day of .1997.
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
Attest:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Published in the Hutchinson Leader:
First reading:
• Second reading:
PROPOSAL FOR AUDIT SERVICES
FOR THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
FOR THE YEARS
DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
,U 1
1
1
1VJ_I 1 L' RS 1.1.11
I,riilr,d 15d,h� L,�,o,.n,mr,,C l
Z/ -G,
n
U
LLP
Certified Pwk Aaoun=w d Cmuisl
115 Fast Hickory Street
Suite 302
P.O. Box 3166
Mar"[%MY 56002 -3166
Mayor and Council Members
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson, Minnesota 55320
July 23, 1997
The following sets forth the engagement of our services for the certified audit of the accounts
of the City of Hutchinson.
We will audit the general purpose financial statements of the City of Hutchinson for the years
ending December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999 in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our audit will include tests of the
accounting records and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express an
• opinion that the financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
An audit includes ex aminin g, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of
transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. Also, we will plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we will not
perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is the risk that material errors, fraud,
or other illegal acts may exist and not be detected by us. However, we will inform you of any
material errors and any fraud that comes to our attention. We will also inform you of any
other illegal acts that come to our attention, unless clearly inconsequential.
We will perform the auditing services discussed above for the calendar years 1997, 1998 and
1999. If at any time during this period the Council is dissatisfied with our services for any
reason whatsoever, our services may be terminated by so informing us. Our firm, however,
shall be obligated at your continuing discretion to perform the audit services for the three -year
period at the following fees:
Audit
Year Fee*
1997 $ 16 325
• 1 998 $ 16 810
1999 $ 17 315
507.625.2727 • Fex 507388.9139
City of Hutchinson
July 23, 1497
Page Two
• p LVN
* Our fee for services quoted is a "not to exceed" fee. You will be billed at our normal per
diem rates and in all cases will not exceed the schedule fees, which include out -of- pocket
expenses.
* Our fee is all inclusive. That is, includes the City audit, the Management Advisory Letter,
and general consultation relating to the audit.
Other services beyond the scope of the basic audit service might include a single audit (if
required) and preparation of the Office of the State Auditor reporting forms. Estimated
additional costs for the reporting forms would be $175.
It is our belief that the proposed three -year audit engagement is in the best interest of the City
of Hutchinson. With the assurance of a three -year engagement, our firm can provide the City
with a fixed three -year fee schedule to facilitate the budgeting process. Further, our ability to
provide meaningful assistance through our Management Advisory Letter will improve with
each year of continued audit involvement.
Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Meyers maintains offices in Owatonna, Mankato and Bloomington with a
total professional staff of twenty-five accountants. Our firm utilizes an IBM computer system
for serving client needs in the data processing field. This system has improved our ability to
• audit clients who have computer systems and greatly extends our capacity for evaluating client
computer programs -and identifying new applications for computer service.
It is the policy of our firm to issue at the conclusion of each audit engagement, a Management
Advisory Letter. As independent auditors, we are in a position to acquire a detailed
knowledge of client financial and administrative procedures; the Advisory Letter serves to
summarize our recommendations toward improving the accounting and administrative controls,
strengthening financial structure and developing a more efficient business operation.
Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Meyers recognizes that its most important product is prompt and
effective service of the highest quality. We believe we can serve the City to its complete
satisfaction and will apply the highest level of skills available in our firm to that end.
Sincerely,
ABDO, ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountants
Y
Kyle W. Meyers, CPA
Mankato Office
10
HUTCHINSON HOCKEY ASSN.
• City of Hutchinson
FEE: � �tJ� APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING DEVICES LICENSE Approved by.
Building
Fire
Application shall be submitted at Police
least _ days prior, to the Gambling occasion
I , James Lobeck AND I, Michael Bissen
Name of Authorized Officer of Name of Designated Gambling
Organization Manager
Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct
the game of gambling in accordance with the provisions of the City of
Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 and Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349
for the license year ending 1998
Sigma , res:
0
thorized Officer of Organization Designat d Ga bling Manager of
organization
A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer
•
of the organization:
1.
True Name: Lobeck
James Conrad
(last)
(first) (middle)
2.
Residence Address:
946 Osgood
Ave Hutchinson MN 55350
(street)
(city) (state) (zip)
3•
Date of Birth:
7 -31 -48
4• Place of BirthM inneapolis, M N
(mo /day /year)
(city /state)
5.
Have you ever been
convicted
of any crime other than a traffic
offense? Yes
No x
If Yes, explain
B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manager
of organization:
1. True Name: Bissen Michael Joseph
(last) (first) (middle)
2. Residence Address: 600 Roberts St. S.W. Hutchinson, MN 55350
(street) (city) (state) (zip)
3. Date of Birth: 9 -28 -54 4. Place of Birth: Mason City, IA
• PAID (mo /day /year) (city /state)
aUG 4 1997
City of Hutchinson —�
• 5. Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a
traffic offense? Yes No X . If yes, explain
6. How long have you been a member of the organization? 6 yrs.
7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action
designating you gambling manager.
C. Game Information:
1. Place where gambling devices will be used 'Jonny's Restaurant- Lou nge
2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used Tuesday through Satur
(date and /or day(s)
3. Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: of week)
From 11:00 A.M. To 1:00 A.M.
P.M. P.M.
4. Maximum number of players One
5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? Cash
6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling
devices _will be used? Yes X No . If so, will a charge
be made for such refreshments? Yes X NO
Organization Information:
1. Address where regular meetings are held Hutchinson Fire Station
2. Day and time of meetings 2nd Wednesday monthly 7:30 p.m.
3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the
State of Minnesota? Yes X No
4. How long has the organization been in existence? 24 yrs.
4a. How many members in the organization? 280
5. What is the purpose of the organization? Youth Hockey
6. Officers of the Organization:
Name Address Title
James Lobeck 946 Osgood Ave S.W. President
Heidi Robb 1025 Sherwood Ave S.E. Treasurer
Dorothy Prahl 408 Boulder St. S.W. Secretary
7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services
to the organization:
Name Address Title
Michael Bissen 600 Roberts St. S.W. Gambling Manaver
a . Organization Information: (Continued)
8. In -whose custody will organization records be kept?
Name Michael Bissen Address 600 Roberts St. s.w.
9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate
the players in the event any injury is sustained by players
while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed
premises, please state the
Name of Insurer N/A and Policy No.
10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly
understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing the operation and use of gambling devices?
Yes
11. Attach a list of all active members of the organization.
E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity
bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization.
1. Name of bonding company Tri -State Ins. Co. of Minnesota
2. Address of bonding company P.O. Box 500 Luverne, MN 56156
3. Amount and duration of bond $10,000 _.
4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding
requirements. Yes No X
I declare that the information I have provided on this application
is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate
the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of
Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gamblia g,
and I will familiarize myse with the contents thereof.
�eGm�.- � d
ignature authorized officer of organization
S cribed and sworn
199`7
1 �-
Date: _
dbefore
1 7/31
aji,qtary pu
FL ir�c rw
S nature of No ar, o P
C mmission expires n
Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this
19
Signature of Notary Public
Commission expires on
N07ARY PUBLIC - MiNNESOTA
My Comm EXPAJ -31,2000
ay of
day of
C
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Staff Communications
DATE: August 7, 1997
Status of Assistant Public Works Director Position
John Olson of Bloomington has contingently accepted the position of Assistant Public Works
Director. This position replaces Doug Meier's position as Maintenance operations Supervisor, and
also supplants some of the duties of the Planning/Public Works Coordinator position formerly held
by Brenda Ewing. Mr. Olson was formerly the Finance Director fro Spicer, and is currently the
Public Works Financial Analyst for the City of Orono. He has a very strong financial background,
including a degree in Business Management, and several years of experience in Public Works
• Administration. He is expected to start September 2, contingent on meeting the requirements of the
City Policy.
Status of Transportation Plan and Open House
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan being completed by SRF Consulting in conjunction with
Mn/DOT and McLeod County, is at a point where a Public Open House is proposed. The Consultant
will discuss the information received so far, and will request feedback from the community. We will
let the Council know when the Open House is scheduled.
Discussion of City Staff Status at McLeod County Fair
City staff has volunteered to provide street and site maintenance services at the McLeod County Fair
for many years. The Fair Board has provided a limited number of passes in return for these services.
City staff is concerned about increasing requests for service, and apparently reduced enumeration
from the Fair Board. In addition, County Highway crews, and City and County Law Enforcement
Officials, are apparently all being paid overtime for doing this work.
The City Street and Park Departments have agreed to volunteer their services for this year, in
specific areas where they are needed. However, both the County and City staff will be reviewing
the cost and manpower needs of this service. With tight budgets and limited personnel, this service
is taking a higher and higher toll on City and County workers.
• City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522
(320) 587.5151
Fax (320) 2344240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350.3097
(320) 587 -2975
Fax (320) 2344240
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 587 -6427
Printed on recycled paper -
• MAIL BALLOT PROPOSAL
" THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON SHALL USE A MAIL BALLOT REFERENDUM IN
ANY AND ALL CITY REFERENDUM QUESTIONS WHATSOEVER, SO THAT
THE APPROVAL OF A SIMPLE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST ON THE
QUESTION, IN A BALLOT QUESTION WILL REFLECT THE WILL OF THE
PEOPLE. THE MAIL BALLOT REFERENDUM SHALL NOT BEGIN UNTIL EIGHT
WEEKS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE CITY COUNCILS
RECOMMENDATION ON SUCH A VOTE, SO AS TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME
FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION AND DEBATE."
NEW INFRASTRUCTURE AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CAP PROPOSAL
"THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, THE HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OR ANY CITY DEPARTMENT, AGENCY,
COMMISSION, OR BOARD, SHALL TRANSFER OR USE NO CITY RESOURCES
OVER $XXX XXX DOLLARS FOR THE FINANCING OF NEW BUSINESS OR
NEW INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENTS OR PROJECTS WITHOUT THE
• APPROVAL OF A SIMPLE MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST, ON THE
QUESTION, IN A BALLOT QUESTION, PUT TO THE PUBLIC IN THE FORM OF
A MAIL BALLOT REFERENDUM.
CITY RESOURCES ARE DEFINED AS: TAX INCREMENT FINANCING, BONDS,
LOANS, LAND PURCHASE OR PROCUREMENT, LAND OR SITE
PREPARATION, INCLUDING NECESSARY INFRASTRUCTURE SUCH AS
ROADS, PARKING DEVELOPMENT, SEWER, WATER, OR OTHER
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES,
ENTERPRISE FUNDS, SALES TAX OR OTHER TAXES, DEFERRED PAYMENT,
INTEREST FREE OR BELOW MARKET INTEREST RATE LOANS, THE
DONATION OR BELOW MARKE VALUE SALE OF ANY CITY RESOURCES OR
HOLDINGS OR ANY OTHER FREE OR BELOW COST CITY SERVICES.
•
HUTCHINSON HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
111 Hassan St. SE Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350
• (320) 234 -4251 • (320) 234 -4235 FAX: 320 - 234 -4240
EQUAL HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jean Ward, HRA Executive Director�'�� c�L
MEMO RE: Approval of Adams Street Neighborhood Rehab Procedural Guide
DATE: July 30, 1997
On July 18, 1997, the Department of Trade and Economic Development informed us that
the Adams Street Neighborhood Rehab Project Procedural Guide has been approved and
the contract conditions for the grant have been cleared.
Enclosed, please find the Adams Street Neighborhood Rehab Project Procedural Guide.
The Hutchinson HRA is asking for your approval and adoption of this Procedural Guide.
• Upon your approval of the Procedural Guide, the Adams Street Project will commence.
We currently have fifteen pre - applications on file at this time which appear eligible for
further processing. Clearance requests for these applications have been submitted to the
Historical Society after which housing inspections will be scheduled. The HRA projects
twenty homes will be completed by December 1998.
Finally, for your information, a Public Hearing will be required after implementation has
begun to obtain citizen views and to respond to any questions regarding the program.
This hearing is being tentatively planned for midway through implementation of the
program.
•
O /t
• RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION OF ADAMS STREET NEIGHBORHOOD
REHABILITATION PROCEDURAL GUIDE
Be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson hereby adopts the aforementioned Procedural
Guide and all the conditions contained within the Guide for the Adams Street
Neighborhood Rehabilitation Project.
I hereby certify that this resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of
Hutchinson on
SIGNED:
Signature
WITNESSED:
Signature
Title Date Title Date
U
•
� 21
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
HOMEOWNER HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM
ADAMS STREET NEIGHBORHOOD
PROCEDURAL GUIDE
The City of Hutchinson through the rehabilitation program will provide assistance to eligible
applicants for the rehabilitation of properties utilizing Small Cities Development Program funds.
The methods of program distribution and eligibility criteria are incorporated in this procedural
guide. There will be no discrimination of persons in the administration of the SCDP funds. No
person or business will be denied services or not awarded a bid for project services due to their
race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap or familial status.
The Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority, on behalf of the City of Hutchinson has
been appointed Project Administrator.
ELIGIBLE PROPERTIES
SCDP funds will be used to improve properties that meet the following criteria:
A. The property must be situated in the Adams Street Housing Rehabilitation Project Area.
The specific project boundaries are shown in Appendix A of this procedural Guide.
• B. The property must be a homeowner occupied residential structure.
C. The property to be improved must be a permanent structure.
D. The property must be determined feasible for rehabilitation. No property that meets the
definition, herein, as dilapidated may be rehabilitated through SCDP funds.
E. The property to be rehabilitated must be considered suitable for rehab under local
definition. The definition of what the City considers to be rehabitable is shown below:
Rehabilitation is not remodeling. Remodeling is for convenience or cosmetic purposes.
Rehabilitation deals with, in order of priority:
(1) health issues and safety issues and
(2) energy conservation, as well as certain long -term preservation of structures such as
siding, roofs and foundations.
Certain types of rehabilitation can be viewed as lack of maintenance or deferred
maintenance. Other types of rehabilitation needs can be viewed as items that wear out or
need replacements because of obsolescence.
C�
S -A
• Rehabitable Building:
A building is Rehabitable when it is structurally sound. To be rehabitable, a building
should be vertically plumb within three degrees and shall have no significant rot on the
majority of the floor joists, studs or rafters that are weight bearing. Foundations and
basement walls shall not be deteriorated to the extent or so out of alignment that they do
not adequately support the building and can not be corrected without complete
replacement.
Generally, if the improvement costs for a structure are 50% more than the County
Assessor's Office market value, the dwelling may be deemed not suitable for
rehabilitation. The City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, however, reserve
the right to provide rehabilitation assistance under certain circumstances where
improvements are in excess of 50% of market value. Such circumstances may include the
following:
• Additional costs to eliminate existing deficiencies that presently constitute an
immediate threat to household health and safety.
• Additional costs necessary to cover physical handicap accessibility improvements for
existing occupants.
It should be understood, however, in no event will the total rehabilitation costs necessary
• to satisfactorily address the above circumstances(s) exceed 75% of the estimated market
value of the structure.
Examples of accessibility improvements could be the typical porch or back door, inside
improvements including access from living room to an upstairs bedroom and /or bathroom,
etc.
In addition to the aforementioned 75% restriction, the City /HRA would be placing the
following two restrictions as to the use of SCDP funds:
1. A cap or maximum rehabilitation cost for a single family home in the amount of
$30,000
2. The structure, of course, would have to be rehabitable and not fall into the category of
"dilapidated ". A dilapidated unit is beyond feasible repair. It is a substandard unit with
serious defects; a dilapidated unit fails to meet a majority of local standards and
rehabilitation is neither practical or economically feasible.
F. The property must be occupied by low /moderate income households as defined herein
upon completion of the improvements.
G. Property that is rehabilitated under this program will meet the Generally accepted
• Community Standards inclusive of the Minnesota Energy Efficiency Standards.
H. No property located within a floodplain will be rehabilitated under this program.
VA
• I. No property may receive SCDP rehabilitation project funds if the property has real estate
taxes due and payable.
J. No property may receive SCDP rehabilitation project funds unless the building is insured.
ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements made with SCDP funds shall satisfy the following requirements:
A. Health and safety needs and concerns within the housing units to be rehabilitated will
always be considered the top priority for funding using SCDP funds.
B. Each improvement must be a permanent general improvement. Permanent general
improvements shall include alteration, renovation or repairs upon and in connection with
existing structures, which correct defects and deficiencies in the property affecting directly
the safety, habitability, energy consumption, or aesthetics of the property.
C. Upon completion of the improvements, the structure must comply with the Generally
accepted Community Standards inclusive of the Minnesota Energy Efficiency Standards
appended thereto and existing HUD Section 8 Housing Quality Standards.
• D. If the structure has been determined historically significant by the Minnesota Historical
Society, plans for exterior improvements to the structure must be reviewed and
commented on by the Minnesota Historical Society. Buildings participating in the
program and constructed prior to 1950 will be evaluated in accordance with the guidelines
received from the Minnesota Historical Society,
E. Each improvement must be made in compliance with 0 applicable health, fire prevention,
and building codes, provided, however, that no application shall be denied solely because
the improvement will not bring such property into full compliance with these codes.
F. No SCDP funds shall be used in whole or in part for the purpose of refinancing or paying
off an existing indebtedness. All such funds must be used to finance improvements begun
after application for such funds.
INELIGIBLE COSTS
The following fist of items are examples of what can not be funded with SCDP funds as part of
the rehabilitation program. Ineligible improvements include, but are not limited to:
1. Air conditioning
• Central, new installation.
• • Room air conditioning.
2. Landscaping.
3. Fireplaces.
3
• 4. New construction.
5. Wind generation devices.
6. Window/Door coverings: blinds, curtains, drapes, shades.
7. Odt buildings, including sheds, utility buildings, barns, silos, new garages, etc.
8. Wood burning stoves.
9. Heat systems located outside the structure.
10. Recreational or entertainment facilities including swimming pools, tennis courts, saunas,
decks and patios.
11. Assessments for public improvements.
12. Improvements begun before the date of the program application.
13. Other items deemed not appropriate to the program.
ELIGIBLE RECIPIENTS
A. The recipients must individually or in the aggregate have at least (1) a life estate or (2) a
one -third interest in the fee title or (3) a one -third interest as purchaser in a contract for
deed with respect to the structure to be improved.
B. All individuals having an ownership interest in such structure must join in the application-
In the event of a life estate, at least one -third of the said parties must join in the
application.
• C. The housing rehabilitation program is designed to be of 100 percent benefit to households
of low to moderate incomes. This will be achieved by following the gross income limits as
set by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the Section 8 Existing
Housing Program. The 1996 income limits as adjusted for fancily size are listed below.
These limits shall be adjusted periodically upon HUD notification of income revisions.
Household Size
Household Income
1
$23,600
2
$26,950
3
$30,300
4
$33,700
5
$36,350
6
$39,050
7
$41,750
8
$44,450
D. Eligible recipients for housing rehab must have household incomes that do not exceed the
above HUD Section 8 income guidelines.
E. Income for the purpose of this rehabilitation program shall be defined as gross annual
income including salary, commissions, bonuses, interest, dividends, tips, capital gains or
sale of securities, annuities, pensions, rental property income (adjusted as allowed by the
• IRS), partnerships, estate or trust income, child support, alimony, social security, aid for
families with dependent children and miscellaneous income. Gross annual income from
self employment shall be deemed to be the net profit from said self employment, as
4
declared by the applicant in Schedule C, F or E, Part III, as appropriate, of the United
States Internal Revenue Service Form 1040, or any other such schedule as may be
hereafter promulgated, but including all depreciation as income.
F. All income shall be verified in writing. The following examples listed below are
considered acceptable.
1. An income verification sheet that is signed by a third party at the source of income.
2. The previous two years tax returns shall be used for those applicants who are self -
employed or having variable incomes.
3. Signed third party verifications from banks, savings and loans, insurance
companies, etc.
G. There will be no asset limitation associated with the SCDP loans.
H. No member of the governing body of the locality and no official, employee or agent of the
local government or program administrator, who exercises policy, decision - making
functions or responsibilities in connection with the planning and implementation of the
Housing Rehabilitation Program shall directly or indirectly benefit from this program.
• IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES
The main and foremost improvement priority for this rehabilitation program is directed to the
health/safety of project residents. The priorities are as follows:
Priority No. 1
Health and safety improvements are the primary emphasis of the rehabilitation efforts
to be conducted in the project area. The improvements are risks to the occupants of a
household. As such, they are mandatory requirements. These improvements are as
follows in their sub- categorical ranking:
1. Fire detection/safe and obstructed egress
2. Electrical code violations
3. Surface impermeability to weather, water and rodents
4. Plumbing violations/deficiencies
5. Adequate and sanitary food preparation areas
6-* Lead based paint abatement in a home built prior to 1978 with peeling or
chipping paint, both interior and exterior, of households with children
under the age of 6.
7. Accessibility modifications for physically handicapped household
member(s).
• *At the time of the owner - occupant's application, each applicant will receive a Lead Based
Paint Warning information and sign off that they have read and understand the literature. At
the time of the property inspection, evidence of chipping and peeling paint will be noted and
M
• addressed in the bidding process so that Lead Based Paint Housing Quality Standards are met.
The specifications and scope of work related to painting include provisions that do not allow
the use of lead base paint on any rehabilitation project. The property will be inspected for
defective paint surfaces and will be identified on the inspection report and corrected as part of
the project.
Priority No. 2
Energy improvements are also a primary improvement to be conducted in conjunction
with health and safety improvements. Improvement priorities are based upon the
improvement's estimated energy cost savings per year that will be provided to the
household after rehab.
* 1. Furnace replacement
2. Attic insulation
3. Wall insulation
4. Storm doors
5. Storm Windows
6. Rim joist insulation
7. Door /window weather - stripping
*Furnace replacement could, very well, be placed as a No. 1 Priority depending
upon the nature and severity of the existing defects. If it is deemed to be a threat to
health/safety of the housing occupants, it will receive a No. 1 Priority.
Priority _No. 3
Basic housing quality components are secondary improvements to be conducted
after the health/safety and energy improvements are addressed. These improvements are
generally deferred maintenance items and major improvements which will need attention
to the immediate future, but which are functional at the present time. They include items
such as the following:
*I- Roofing could be a No. 2 Priority depending upon the nature and severity
of the project.
2. Painting
3. Window replacement
APPLICATION AND APPLICATION SELECTION
The City /HRA will not be approving applications from homeowners on a first come
first served basis Rather, the HRA will be approving applications based upon a RATING
SYSTEM which primarily focuses on HEALTH/SAFETY deficiencies associated with
owner - occupant single family homes.
The rating system is based upon a point scoring device which awards points
determined by the number of "yes" responses answered by the homeowner on
health/safety questionnaire. The questionnaire has twelve specific questions that will help
• homeowners to identify potential health/safety deficiencies in their home. Each "yes"
response will be awarded one point, therefore, each application will be assigned a score of
zero to twelve points. Applications will then be ranked first by score, then by date and
time of application. Those applications having scores of twelve would be accepted for
processing first, followed by ten, nine, etc., until SCDP funds are exhausted. The
following questions have been devised for ranking purposes:
1. Do you need additional smoke detectors per City code? (One in each sleeping
area, on each level and furnace room. If your furnace is in an unfinished basement,
only one detector is needed in the basement.) Does your home need safe and
unobstructed fire exists. All windows and doors should be operable and free from
any blockage. Windows in sleeping areas should be of size to allow a fully suited
fireman passage.
2. Do you have any knob and tube type wiring in your home?
3. Are you having trouble with your fuses blowing or is your electrical service under
100 amps and/or fuse serviced?
4. Do you need ground fault interrupter outlets? (Are required in all bathrooms,
within six feet of kitchen sinks, in laundry area and in outside outlets.
5. Is your roof leaking?
6. Do you have any leaking water or sewer pipes and is your plumbing properly
When applicant homeowners have been selected on the basis of the aforementioned RATING
SYSTEM, the following levels of funding assistance will be utilized by the HRA:
PROJECT FUNDING
LEVEL NO. 1 - VERY LOW INCOME - 50% of Median Area Income or Less
100% Deferred SCDP Loan - Forgiven after 10 years, as long as home remains
• principal residence of the recipient.
vented?
• 7.
Do you need to update/replace heating equipment so that it is free from cracks,
and capable of providing adequate heat to all rooms used for living?
8.
Is your furnace properly vented to the chimney and is there a six inch fresh air
intake?
9.
Is your chimney in need of repair ? (i.e. cracking, obstructed or in need of a new
liner)
10.
Is your foundation showing signs of deterioration resulting in substantial settling or
cracking?
11.
Do you have children age six or under in the household, and is there evidence of
interior or exterior chipped or peeling paint that may be lead based? (Painting done
prior to 1978). See enclosed lead based paint brochure for additional information.
12.
Do modifications need to be made to your home for accessibility that will increase
the ability of a physically handicapped person to function in the home setting?
When applicant homeowners have been selected on the basis of the aforementioned RATING
SYSTEM, the following levels of funding assistance will be utilized by the HRA:
PROJECT FUNDING
LEVEL NO. 1 - VERY LOW INCOME - 50% of Median Area Income or Less
100% Deferred SCDP Loan - Forgiven after 10 years, as long as home remains
• principal residence of the recipient.
• LEVEL NO. 2 - LOW INCOME - 50% - 65% of Median Area Income
80% Deferred SCDP Loan 10 Year Term - 20% Owner Match*
LEVEL NO. 3 - LOW INCOME - 65% - 80% of Median Area Income
70% Deferred SCDP Loan 10 Year Term - 30% Owner Match*
The following repayment schedule applies to all three levels, if the recipient sells
or vacates the home:
0 - 1 Years
100% Repayment
5 - 6 Years
50% Repayment
1 - 2 Years
90% Repayment
6 - 7 Years
40% Repayment
2 - 3 Years
80% Repayment
7 - 8 Years
30% Repayment
3 - 4 Years
70% Repayment
8 - 9 Years
20% Repayment
4 - 5 Years
60% Repayment
9 - 10 Years
10% Repayment
$24,625
$30,300
10 Years
Forgiven
* If a Level No.2 or Level No.3 applicant cannot obtain the required owner match and has
received two written denials from participating lenders,
the HRA Board reserves the right to
determine if the applicant may receive a 100%
SCDP loan.
•
HUD Section 8 Guidelines will be used to determine the LMI Status of the program
applicants as follows (Income cannot exceed figure under
each level according to family size):
Family Size Level No. l
Level No.
2 Level No. 3
1 $14,750
$19,175
$23,600
2 $16,850
$21,900
$26,950
3 $18,950
$24,625
$30,300
4 $21,050
$27,375
$33,700
5 $22,750
$29,550
$36,350
6 $24,400
$31,725
$39,050
7 $26,100
$33,925
$41,750
8+ $27,800
$36,125
$44,450
Non -SCDP financing shall be funds or financing received from private lenders,
weatherization programs, MHFA rehabilitation loan program funds, community action
agency funds, RD grant/loan funds, MHFA energy loan funds or any combination of these
and other sources of financing or funding. The use of Non -SCDP financing will help
promote cost effective use of SCDP funds.
• 1. Coordination of available "Program Funds" will be done by the HRA.
M
• 2. The decision as to which Non -SCDP funds may be available, will be based on each
applicant's individual financial situation and the requirements of the Non -SCDP
funding source.
The owner must agree to have all Non -SCDP funds for the rehabilitation work
deposited in an escrow account controlled by the project administrator for disbursements
to the contractor when the work is satisfactorily completed. Withdrawals can be made
only upon written authorization from both the property owner and the Project
Administrator.
REPAYMENT OF SCDP FUNDS
A. SCDP Deferred Loan/Grants shall be secured by a repayment agreement.
B. In the case of the deferred loan/grant, all persons who signed the application for a deferred
loan/grant must enter into an agreement with the City of Hutchinson for repayment of the
loan/grant. The agreement shall provide that:
In the event that the improved property is sold, transferred or otherwise conveyed within
ten years from the date upon which the application was approved, the recipient shall repay
all or a portion of such SCDP deferred loan/grant in accordance with the schedule below:
• L Level No I - Vea Low Income - 100% Deferred
Level No. 2 - Low Income - 80% Deferred - 20% Owner Match - Prorated
Level No. 3 - Low Income - 70% Deferred - 30% Owner Match - Prorated
If recipient sells or vacates the home the repayment terms are as follows:
0 - 1 Years
100% Repayment
1 - 2 Years
90% Repayment
2 - 3 Years
80% Repayment
3 - 4 Years
70% Repayment
4 - 5 Years
60% Repayment
5 - 6 Years
6 - 7 Years
7 - 8 Years
8 - 9 Years
9 - 10 Years
10 Years
50% Repayment
40% Repayment
30% Repayment
20% Repayment
10% Repayment
Forgiven
2. That deferred loan/grant funds due upon sale of the property prior to the official
close -out of the grant shall be paid directly to City of Hutchinson, to be used for
further rehabilitation projects and shall be deducted from the draw down requests
as required by DTED.
• 3. That deferred loan/grant funds due upon sale of property after the official close-
out of the grant shall be paid directly to the City of Hutchinson.
0
• 4. The repayment agreement shall be subordinate to funds provided by private
lending institutions and other leveraging sources-
5.1 That if the SCDP funds are used for purposes other than an eligible improvement
upon an eligible property, or if the application is found to contain a material
misstatement of fact, then the recipient of the deferred loan/grant shall be liable for
100 percent repayment of the deferred loan/grant.
6. That the recipient of a deferred loan/grant shall be required to notify the City of
Hutchinson immediately upon the sale, transfer or conveyance of the improved
property.
7. That if the recipient would change residence and the improved property would
become rental property, the recipient would be obligated to pay the deferred
loan/grant in full at that time.
C. SCDP deferred loans/grants shall be secured by a mortgage.
MARKETING
A. The program administrator, on behalf of the City of Hutchinson, will conduct outreach in
the targeted area and will solicit applications for the Adams Street Neighborhood Housing
• Rehabilitation Program utilizing the below listed methods as necessary and /or appropriate:
1. Issue press releases advertising community meetings regarding project both to
local print and broadcast media.
2. Direct mail program information to the homeowners in the target area, if
necessary, to generate additional applicants.
3. Develop posters and brochures and post them in prominent areas in the
community.
4. Place program flyers door to door in project area.
INSPECTION OF PROPERTY
A. Once an applicant has been determined eligible for SCDP funds:
Property inspection will be conducted by the HRA Housing Inspector.
2. The Housing Inspector wilt determine the work necessary to bring the property
into compliance with:
• a. Generally Accepted Community Standards
b. Minnesota Energy Efficiency Standards as is practical
10
• C. Other standards as required by the Grant Agreement
3.' The Housing Inspector will then prepare a Scope of Work (work write -up) that
will rectify violations to the housing standards, and local codes. Any ineligible cost
that is done during the rehabilitation process shall be paid for by the owner, over
and above what the SCDP funds are being used for. The Scope of Work shall
contain the following:
a. Instructions to the bidder
b. Bid proposal
C. Program warranties
d. General conditions
e. Special conditions
f Diagrams and layouts as appropriate or needed
REHAB LOAN REVIEW PROCEDURE
• A. Each individual rehabilitation project will be presented to the HRA Loan Review
Committee or designee for approval after eligibility requirements have been investigated,
the property has been inspected, work write -ups have been completed, bidding process is
complete, project cost has been determined and, if necessary, outside financing for owner
match secured. The HRA Loan Review Committee or designee will be presented with a
Project Presentation Form that will discuss the project, but not divulge any information
that would violate privacy requirements. The Project Presentation Form is attached to the
back of the procedural guide.
B. After approval by the HRA Loan Review Committee or designee, a date for loan closing
shall be set. If the project fails to meet an eligibility requirement or is not approved by the
HRA Loan Review Committee, the applicant shall be informed in writing by the Housing
Rehabilitation Loan Coordinator within ten working days and shall be informed of the
appeal process. At the time of loan closing, the owner match will be required and put
into an escrow account.
C. The HRA Loan Review Committee, or designee, will sign the Project Presentations form.
ELIGIBLE CONTRACTORS AND BIDDING PROCEDURES
A. All contractors participating in the Small Cities Development Program must have on file at
the HRA office, a contractor's application and must be licensed by the state. The
contractor will be responsible for securing insurance of the amounts specified on the
application form.
11
• B. The contract is between the applicant and the contractor. The applicant will be provided a
list of the HRA approved contractors to choose from. However, an applicant is free to
choose any contractor whom the applicant may desire.
C. In order for a contractor who is not approved by the HRA to be awarded a contract, the
contractor must furnish the HRA a Certificate of Insurance, Contractor's License Number
and must complete a contractor application. Upon doing so, the contractor may be
awarded a contract.
D. Contractors will be allowed to bid on any and all rehabilitation projects. However, no
single contractor will be allowed to work on more than three rehabilitation projects at one
time.
E. The contract shall be awarded to the lowest base bid unless one of the following
circumstances occurs:
1. The bid is determined to be unrealistically low by the HRA and the contractor
agrees to withdraw the bid.
2. The contractor has failed to follow the procedures as outlined in the instructions to
the bidders.
3. The homeowner does not want the low contractor to perform the work and agrees
to pay the difference between the lowest bid and the preferred contractor's bid.
4. There appears to have been collusion between two or more contractors in which
case all bids under question will be thrown out and different contractors solicited
for bids.
5. The contractor fails to bid according to the specifications and it proves impossible
to compare that contractor's bid with the other contractor bids.
F. A minimum of two bids shall be solicited for each improvement project. Bidding shall be
done on a general contractor basis, unless under certain cases, it will be a significant cost
benefit to the homeowner to bid out the individual projects separately. This decision will
be made by the HRA Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator.
G. The HRA will periodically do press releases about the project to encourage contractor
participation. Encouragement of women and minority -owned business to participate will
be included in the press releases.
H. All portions of the work must be performed by a contractor.
0
12
• BID SUMMATION AND FINANCIAL PACKAGING
A. Bids will be presented to the property owner.
B. Upon acceptance of a bid by an applicant, the HRA will, working with the property
owner, package the project according to:
1. Eligibility of the property owner
2. Availability of Non -SCDP program funds
3. Other available funds, and
4. The appropriate level of SCDP funding
C. The loan package shall include:
1. The applicant's household composition
2. Applicant's gross income
3. Estimated market value of the property
• 4. Property location
5. Applicant's equity in the property
6. Proposed rehabilitation activities
7. SCDP funding requested
S. Other funding to be used in the project
D. The necessary repayment agreements, mortgage and other legal necessary documentation
are prepared by the HRA Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator.
E. A mortgage shall be placed on the property for the full amount of the SCDP dollars spent
on the project.
F. The property owner shall be responsible for paying the recording fee of the mortgage.
G. Closing will then take place with the property owner and other appropriate parties to the
closing.
• H. Three days after closing the HRA will issue a Notice to Proceed to the accepted
contractor(s).
13
• CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
A. The Notice to Proceed allows the contractor 90 days to complete the contract except
under the following conditions:
1. The work is weather dependent and weather conditions have not allowed the
completion of the work.
2. The Notice to Proceed is issued too late in the building season to allow weather
dependent work to be completed on time.
3. The homeowner preferred contractor is too heavily committed to perform the
work within the allotted time and informs the homeowner and the HRA that he/she
is to heavily committed and a work schedule is established which is acceptable to
the homeowner, the HRA and the contractor.
4. Unforeseen difficulties develop with the approved work and force a delay.
B. Interim inspections will be performed by the HRA to monitor work progress and quality of
workmanship.
C. Change orders to the contract:
• 1. Require the signatures of the:
a. Homeowner
b. Contractor
c. HRA Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator
d. The Housing Inspector, and
e. The Project Director
2. Will be allowed only for the following reasons:
a. To rectify hidden deficiencies that are discovered once the work has begun
b. To change a specification due to unforeseen difficulties arising after the
work has begun
C. To address a deficiency that was inadvertently dropped from the project
during project packaging
• D. If a dispute arises between a property owner and a contractor, the HRA Housing
Rehabilitation Coordinator will attempt to find a means of resolving the dispute. If a
14
• solution cannot be found, either party may then appeal the HRA Loan Review Committee
and the Project Director- their decision will be final.
E. A' contractor's contract may be terminated by the HRA Housing Rehabilitation
Coordinator and the Project Director for any of the following reasons:
1. Poor work performance on the job site and the demonstrated inability to rectify the
poor workmanship. The cost of repairing poor workmanship shall be deducted
from any amount owed to the initial contractor for work completed.
2. Causing undue damages to a homeowner's property and the inability or
unwillingness to correct the damages. The cost of repairing the damages will be
deducted from any money owed the contractor for work already completed.
3. The contractor lacks sufficient insurance coverage.
4. The inability of the contractor to perform the work within the allotted time.
5. Unreconcilable and unreasonable differences between the contractor and the
property owner.
6. The contractor requests to be removed from the contract. There will be no penalty
• associated with this request as long as the request is made within 30 days of
receiving the Notice to Proceed.
7. Contractors who are removed from a contract shall be removed from the approved
contractor's list and shall be prohibited from being awarded any contracts with this
program until such time as the problem has been corrected and HRA might
reinstate their approved status.
PAYMENT
A_ All contractors will agree to the payment schedule contained within the contractor's
application which is as follows:
No pre - payments are allowed for any reason.
2. Partial payments will be allowed only for completed portions of the project.
3. Payments will be made only after the work is completed according to the
specifications contained within the Scope of Work and meets with the approval of
the applicant and the HRA after inspection.
• 4. Payments will be made only upon presentation of the following documents:
a. Billing statement
15
• b. Lien waiver
C. Sworn Construction statement
d. Completion Certificate
PROJECT FILES
A. The Housing Rehab Coordinator shall maintain files on each applicant throughout the
duration of the project. Those files shall include the following:
Section A - File Checklist
1. Homeowner Application
2. Property Presentation Form/Approved by Rehab Committee
3. Replacement Cost Worksheet
4. Eligibility Verification
• 5. Income Verification Form
a. Employment Verification
b. Second Employment Verification
C. Self - employment Income
d. Bank Verification
e. Ul/General Assistance
f. AFDC Grant Verification
g. Social Security Verification
h. Pension/Retirement Verification
6. Historical Society Clearance
7. Property Tax Verification
8. Title Verification Form
9. Property Insurance Verification
10. Lead Based Paint Receipt/Photo Release Form
11. Privacy Act Release Form
• 12. Property Owner Conditions
13. Property Inspection Completed
16
• 14. Heartland Pre- application
13. Heartland Income Eligible/Not Eligible
7.
8.
• 9.
10
Se
Section B - File Checklist
1. Change Orders (if applicable)
2. Specifications for Rehabilitation (Notice to Bid)
3. Notice to Proceed
4. Contractor/Property Owner Agreement/Property Owner Conditions
5. Certificate of Contractor Insurance
6. Contractor Award Notice
Contractor Non -Award Notice
Proposal Form/Bid Specification
Copies of Proposals Received
Bid Tabulation
-tion C - File Checklist
1. SCDP Deferred Loan Repayment Agreement/Note
2. SCDP Mortgage
3. Work Program (if applicable)
4. Documentation of Non -SCDP Finances (if applicable)
Section D - File Checklist
1. Drawdown Form/Lien Waiver
2. Improvement Certificate
Section E - File Checklist
• 1. Owner Evaluation
2. Completion Certificate
17
• B. Copies of forms as appropriate are appended.
C. HRA at its option, may accept documentation and verification from other agencies
working with the same applicant. Other agencies at this time are:
1. MHFA
2. Heartland
3. Rural Development
APPEALS
A If an applicantlproperty owner's application is denied for any reason or is dissatisfied with
the level of assistance received, the following procedure is to allow for a standardized
appeal/complaint process for all applicants of the Small Cities Development Program.
B. In the event of denial or a complaint, the applicant/complaint:
Will be informed of the appeal process.
2. Will be given a copy of the appeal process.
• 3. Will be given a written notice clearly stating under what condition that the
application was denied.
C. The applicant who wishes to appeal the denial of benfits must submit their appeal within
14 days of receipt of denial either orally or in writing to the Housing Rehab Loan
Coordinator. That appeal must state:
I . The reason(s) for the appeal.
2. Information that the applicant believes is pertinent to the appeal.
D. If the applicant is not satisfied with the decision of the Housing Rehab Coordinator, an
appeal may made in writing to the Project Director within 14 days of decision by the
Housing Rehab Coordinator. The Project Director shall review all written appeals with
the HRA Loan Review Committee.
E. Further appeal may be made to the HRA Loan Review Committee by appearing in person
before the committee. The Project Director shall respond to the applicant in writing
within 15 working days of appearing before the committee:
1. The results of the review
• 2. An explanation of the findings
3. The next step the applicant can take if not satisfied with the response
IV
G. If the applicant is denied assistance by the HRA Loan Review Committee, final appeal
may be made to:
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development
500 metro Square
121 East Seventh Place
St. Paul, MN 55116
GENERAL CONDITIONS
A No project may be started until:
1. Grant dollars are made available
2. The program is officially up and running
• 3. The application process has been approved
4. HRA has issued a Notice to Proceed
B. Any work done on a project prior to these steps will mean that part of the project is
ineligible for funding.
C. The proceeds received from the repayment of Rehabilitation loans originated SCDP funds
will go toward establishing a revolving loan fund to provide funds for rehabilitation
projects on an ongoing basis.
A These procedural guidelines may be amended in whole or in part or supplemented by the
Hutchinson Housing and Redevelopment Authority as deemed appropriate and /or needed
and will be effective on the date of issue, and as long as DTED gives its approval.
Uproced2.gui
•
19
C
MEMORANDUM
July 31, 1997
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
SUBJECT: COALITION OF GREATER MN CITIES
I have surveyed all of the directors and the unanim recommendation is not belong to the Coalition
in 1998, considering budget constraints.
• Senator Steve Dille suggested passing on it for 1998, and reconsidering the Coalition in 1999. At
this time, I do not know how Representative Ness feels, however I have requested that he contact
Ken Merrill. Ken may have something to add at the Council meeting in my absence.
• City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -5151 (320) 587 -2975 (320) 587.2242
Fax (320) 2344240 Fax (320) 2344240 YYY Fax (320) 587.6427
- Printed on recycled paper -
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES
TACTICAL OPERATIONS CENTER PROJECT
Project Description: To purchase and renovate a 1989 Ford El Dorado Bus
(VIN 1 FDKE37M9KHB59331) into a Tactical Operations
Center for use by public safety response agencies in
the City of Hutchinson.
Project Need: The City of Hutchinson is currently using a renovated school bus as
the tactical operations center. The bus was purchased in 1991 from
local donations. At the time of purchase, the bus had over 250,000
miles. The vehicle is now experiencing transmission problems which
will cost more to repair than the vehicle is worth. Additionally, the
vehicle does not have adequate space to conduct tactical field oper-
ations which emergency management services has been called upon
• to perform in the past few months.
Project Cost: The cost of purchasing and renovating the 1989 Ford El Dorado Bus is
as follows:
PURCHASE OF VEHICLE $7,854.37
EXTERIOR REPAIR AND GRAPHICS $1,200.00
RADIO & TELEPHONE INSTALLATION $1,250.00
ELECTRICAL WIRING $2,000.00
INTERIOR MODIFICATIONS $4,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST $16,304.37
Project Information: This unit will replace an outdated vehicle which is in poor
mechanical condition. The new unit will have factory
installed heating and air conditioning and is powered with
a diesel engine which will allow for extended periods of
idling without damage to the engine.
This unit will be available to all public safety agencies (fire, ems,
police, public works, etc) to provide communications and
necessary planning area to manage a major emergency in our
community. This unit will also provide the necessary transport
capabilities for the police special response team and mobile
• trauma kits for the hospital.
• CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MEMO
Finance Department
August 8, 1997
kVOM .tI?M0 Aff- OPO • 1
1= 5 54 ow WUM 4 0 � .qRx
A request has been received from John Rodeberg to increase the
spending for 1997 on road construction in the cemetery. The budget
for 1997 contained $6,000 for this purpose. The request is to
increase this amount to $13,000. Funding would come from the
perpetual care fund.
• The city council is asked to consider and approve this request for
additional funding for 1997.
F. \D \MM"12.NPD
•
r-_vI
C,
•
•
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Property Acquisition for Improvement Projects
5th Avenue SE Bridge and Roadway Improvements
North - Central Trunk Sanitary Sewer
DATE: August 7, 1997
5th Avenue SE
Attached please find a memorandum to City Attorney Barry Anderson detailing properties needing
to be acquired for construction of the 5th Avenue Bridge and Roadway project. Estimated purchase
prices are based on an appraisal completed two years ago for similar industrial property. An
inflation factor has been figured in. A new appraisal is being completed by the City, and will be
used to verify the value of the taking.
In addition to these properties, we will need to purchase crossing/property rights from Dakota Rail.
This area is 9631.5 square feet, which at $0.61 /SF is $5,875.22. However, 4,944.4 SF of phis area
is originally platted street right -of -way. If this does not need,to be purchased, the area would be
4,687.1 SF ($2,859.13).
North - Central Sanitary Sewer Trunk
The site previously owned by Hormel on TH 7 West has been purchased by Brent Reiner. It is
proposed that the City acquire 20' of easement from this property, and E&T Contracting's property
to the west to allow for future construction of the North - Central Trunk Sanitary Sewer. Since a 10'
easement is normally given in commercial areas, and easement values are less than outright purchase
values, it is proposed to purchase 10' from each property owner. At $.61 /SF this sum would be
$1,230 for the Reiner property and $1,900 for the E &T parcel.
Action
We would like the Council to approve acquisition of these properties for improvement project
purposes. The acquisition will be funded through improvement bonds for the projects. A
verification of "Right -of- -Way" purchase certificate will also be required for 5th Avenue SE.
City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
(320) 587 -5151
Fax(320)234.4240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
(320) 587 -2975
Far (320) 234.4240
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
P J� (320) 587.2242
/2F
Fax (320) 587.6427
- Printed on recycled paper -
M E M O R A N
TO: Barry Anderson, City Attorney
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Right -of -Way Acquisition for 5th Avenue SE
DATE: August 4, 1997
We need to obtain the right -of -way for 5th Avenue SE ASAP as based on surveys completed by Pellinen
Land Surveying. This is proposed to be platted as "City of Hutchinson Street Right -of -Way Plat No.
3. All properties needed for the right -of -way except for the following are owned by the City.
The value per square foot is based on valuations completed for the Leonard Miller property, McGowan
Manufacturing and Consolidated Freightways. The 1995 value was determined to be $0.55 /square foot.
Based on a 5% increase per year, this would relate to a 1997 rate of $0.61 /square foot.
• Proper EM O wner Acquisition Total Value
Auditor's Plat of the west half of
Sec. 5, T116N, R29W
Lot 9 ? Goebel Fixtures 6663.0 SF $4,064.43
Lot 10 (Ranch Avenue) ? Goebel Fixtures 1100.1 SF $ 671.06
Lot 1 I ? Goebel Fixtures 2987.9 SF $1,822.62
Swanson's Subdivision in
Hutchinson Industrial District
Lot 3 05- 116-29 -05 -0031 Allied Mechanical 2406.8 SF $1,468.15
Lot 4 05- 116-29- 05 -003o Dick McClure 165.2 $100.77
First Addition to Hutchinson
Industrial District
Lot 2 05- 116-29 -05 -0070 Hutch. Telephone 264.6 $161.41
I understand that James Robinson will be completing an appraisal for HCDC on the Goebel property.
Based on that, I would recommend that these numbers be revised. I need these property owners to
agree to sell (with documentation) ASAP in order to set a date for the 5th Avenue SE Bridge and
Roadway project. Please let me know what it will take to complete this work within the next 2
weeks!!!
i s City Center Parks & Recreation Police Services
111 Hassan Street SE' 900 Harrington Street SW 10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -5151 (320) 587 -2975 �j (320) 587 -2242
Far (320) 234-4240 Fax (320) 234-4240 X — E, Fax (320) 587 -6427
Printed on recycled paper -
0
•
n
U
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 8, 1997
SUBJECT: Letting No. 3/Project No. 97 -08
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they
be constructed.
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
File: L3/97 -08
? -E (-1)
TO: Mayor and City Council
97 -08: 5th Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, watermain and services, sanitary sewer
and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base,
49 PUBLICATION NO. 5075
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 3
PROJECT NO. 97 -08
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in
the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson,
MN, at 6:00 P.M. on the 26th day of August, 1997, to consider the making of an
improvement of:
97 -08: 5th Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, watermain and services,
sanitary sewer and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and appurtenances;,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be
assessed for such improvement is the benefitted property, for which property owners shall
• receive mailed notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $114,000.00, with an Assessable Cost
of $110,000.00, and an estimate State Cost of $280,000.00, for the total estimated cost of
$504,000.00.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be
heard at this meeting.
Dated: August 12, 1997
City Administrator
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING,
WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT
YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE
REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, AUGUST
• 14TH, 1997 AND THURSDAY, AUGUST 21ST, 1997.
zL-
• RESOLUTION NO. 10875
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO.3
PROJECT NO. 97 -08
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve:
97 -08: 5th Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, watermain and services, sanitary sewer and
services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing,
sidewalk and appurtenances;,
WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE PT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is
instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to
whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 12th day of August, 1997
•
City Administrator
is
Mayor
8-x(1)
RESOLUTION NO. 1087 6
•
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO.3
PROJECT NO. 97 -08
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted August 12, 1997, a report has been prepared
by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of:
97 -08: 5th Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, watermain and services, sanitary sewer and
services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing,
sidewalk and appurtenances;,
and said report was received by the Council on August 12, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the
assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 504.000.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 26th day of Autust, 1997, in the
Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice
of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
�-E (I-)
0
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: August 8, 1997
SUBJECT: Letting No. 10/Project No. 97 -28
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they
be constructed.
•
•
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
file: 1,10P97 -28
T ' /
Project No. 97.28: Island View Heights 2nd Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb & gutter,
RESOLUTION NO. 10877
• RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 10
PROJECT NO. 97-28
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Island View Heights 2nd Addition by construction of storm sewer,
sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb & gutter, bituminous surfacing
and appurtenances, and
WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the
improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is
instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to
whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection
with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
U
Mayor
City Administrator
g -F
RESOLUTION NO. 10878
• RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 10
PROJECT NO. 97-28
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted August 12, 1997, a report has been prepared
by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of Island View Heights 2nd Addition by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb
& gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and said report was received by the Council on August 12, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the
assessment of benefitted property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $ 930.000.00.
waied.
CJ
2. This improvement was petitioned for by 100% of the property owners and public hearing is hereby
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
Mayor
City Administrator
u
9 ! '
RESOLUTION NO. 10879
• RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING NO. 10
PROJECT NO. 97 -28
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 13th day of August, 1996, waived public hearing
on the improvement of Island View Heights 2nd Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services,
watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb & gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 12th day of August, 1997.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall prepare plans and
specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 13th day of August, 1996.
•
•
Mayor
City Administrator
yl !
RESOLUTION NO. 10880
• RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 10
PROJECT NO. 97 -28
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement of
Island View Heights 2nd Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb & gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby
approve&
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official newspaper, an
advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The
advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be
publicly opened at 10:00 am on Monday, September 5th, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City
Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered
by the Council on September 9th, 1997, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson,
Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an
opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed
• with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check
payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid-
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of August, 1997.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
,�—
C
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Subdivision Agreement for Island View Heights 2nd Addition
DATE: August 7, 1997
Attached please find a copy of the proposed Subdivision Agreement for Island View Heights. The
Subdivider (Bill Gilk of Scenic Heights Investments) has an issue with some of what we have
proposed in this document. In particular:
1. We are proposing to assess all initial costs to the Subdivider. Since most of the storm sewer
improvements needed to serve the plat must be completed in the first phase, the cost of this work
makes the assessments to the first phase lots substantially higher than the 2nd phase lots will be.
• It has been the City's policy not to allow assessments within a new development to be deferred.
This has been discussed with City Attorney Barry Anderson and Finance Director Ken Merrill,
and it was agreed that, unless some type of financial assurance can be provided, this policy
should remain in effect.
2. The Subdivider would like the City to maintain the sanitary sewer and watermain laterals that
are located within easements, under private streets. In reviewing this issue with Randy DeVries
(Director of Water/Wastewater Operations) and other staff, it is our feeling that we can safely
maintain these lines without a significant potential for damage to private driveways, yards and
housing units. Any major repair work will require substantial restoration of private property, and
a significant potential for damage. Based on these issues, it is our recommendation that this
work be privately contracted. We have agreed to contract to do some of this work.
3. Park dedication is being reviewed by the Park Board and staff.
The Subdivider would like us to guarantee that trunk assessment rates will not increase. I could
not make that guarantee, and also noted that current projections indicate that these rates may be
increased substantially for 1998 construction. We will agree to either assess these fees, or collect
them with the building permit.
I would expect that Mr.
Gilk may want to be at the Council meeting to discuss these issues.
• City Center
Parks & Recreation
Police Services
Ill Hassan Street SE
900 Harrington Street S W
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2464
(320) 587 -5151
Fax (320) 2344240
(320) 587 -2975
Fax (320) 234 -4240
(320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 587 -6427
- Printed on recycled paper -
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
• ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION
CITY OFHUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into the day and year set forth hereinafter, by and
between Scenic Heights Investment, a Minnesota Corporation, owner and proprietor, hereinafter called
the "Subdivider ", and the City of Hutchinson, a Municipal Corporation in the County of McLeod, State
of Minnesota, hereinafter called the "City';
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Subdivider is the owner and developer of land situated in the City of Hutchinson,
County of McLeod, State of Minnesota, which has been surveyed and platted as ISLAND VIEW
HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION, and;
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 464 and 466 requires the Subdivider to make certain
improvements in the subdivision;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall be responsible for all work associated with site
• preparation and grading. All areas within the final plat, but outside of the rights -of -way, shall be
graded to within 0.5 feet of final grade to allow for proper drainage, and the installation of utilities.
The ponding area shall be constructed to within 0.2 feet of approved grades. The entire right -of-
way shall be graded to within 0.2 feet of final subgrade, as noted in the approved improvement
plans for the project. Any and all unstable soil conditions or soils unsuitable for construction in the
right -of -way shall be corrected and/or replaced. The Subdivider shall clear trees and/or debris from
utility easements and rights -of -way, as per the request of the City or utility, prior to installation of
the improvements. All soils shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% Standard Proctor Density.
All work shall conform with the approved Site Grading Plan, and shall be completed prior to the
commencement of construction on the site.
2. Subdivider shall complete all work noted in Paragraph No. 1, and provide a written verification
from a professional engineer or surveyor, prior to installation of utilities and/or issuance of building
permits. Any costs associated with these requirements shall be the sole responsibility of the
Subdivider, and are not financed through the City. Following written verification that the site work
has been completed has been received by the City, after ten days written notice, the Subdivider
agrees that the City may complete unfinished work within the Right -of -way or easements, and bill
or assess (at the City's discretion) the costs to complete the work, including City overhead. It is
agreed and understood that timely completion of this work is essential in order to complete the
infrastructure improvements within the plat.
3. It is agreed and understood that natural gas or electric distribution mains and services will not be
scheduled for installation until all utility and street construction has been completed in the plat, and
• all provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 of this section have been met.
IVH2 -Page 1 f /�
4. It is understood and agreed that it shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider to make topsoil
• available for backfill of the curb and gutter. If stockpiled topsoil is not available on the site, topsoil
may be required to be hauled to the site by the infrastructure contractor at the Subdivider's expense.
Seeding of the rights -of -way will be included in the improvement project However, the Subdivider
shall provide all turf establishment and erosion control necessary to protect the utilities and street
improvements beyond the boulevard areas. The Subdivider shall also provide all erosion control
during site grading work, prior to infrastructure construction, necessary to meet local and state
requirements. The entire site shall be planted with perennial rye grass, or other erosion control
plantings, following completion of site grading.
5. It is understood and agreed that it shall be the Subdivider's responsibility to provide survey control
points for all infrastructure and site construction. This shall include, but is not limited to, curve
points on all street rights -of -way, storm sewer structures and endpoints in all easement areas,
property comers, and other points determined as necessary to properly locate and construct the
infrastructure improvements on the development site. It is also understood and agreed that the
Subdivider shall replace all survey points disturbed by the Subdivider, or those under his control.
It is also understood that survey points disturbed by the City, or parties contracted to the City, shall
be replaced by the Subdivider, but the cost of this work shall be paid by the City, or parties
contracted to the City, at the same rates charged to the Subdivider.
F1 E
MA
1. It is understood and agreed that all street construction and maintenance outside of rights -of -way,
• and all infrastructure construction and maintenance outside of rights -of -way, except for storm
sewer in utility and drainage easements, shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider. All
construction shall meet the appropriate standards of construction as relates to the construction being
completed (i.e. the City Engineer's Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications for Utility
Construction, Minnesota State Building or Plumbing Codes, or other). The City may, at its own
discretion, contract with the Subdividerr and/or the association to provide construction and
maintenance services.
2. Although the City may agree to construct sanitary sewer and watermain lines in easement areas
outside of public street rights -of -way, it is understood that these lines will be privately maintained.
Due to the limited work environment created by closely spaced buildings, the location of private
streets and abundant driveways, and other potential conflicts in excess of those usually found in
areas with public utilities, all duties and costs associated with maintenance, repair, and/or
reconstruction of these utilities will be the responsibility of the Subdivider or assignees.
3. It is agreed and understood that the all maintenance and/or reconstruction of private streets and
utilities shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider and/or heirs, association(s), representatives,
assigns and successors of the parties.
4. It is understood and agreed that it shall be the Subdivider's responsibility to locate, reconnect
and/or reconstruct all drain tile lines through the property. The neighboring property owner to the
west of this development has verified that a drain tile serving other properties runs through Island
• View Heights 2nd Addition. The City shall be notified if an existing drain tile is disturbed.
IVH2 -Page 2
5. It is agreed and understood that the Subdivider shall be responsible for assuring that building
• construction is completed in conformance with the preliminary plat and grading plan. It is essential
that the vertical and horizontal locations of the structure are verified to avoid conflict with
infrastructure and potential flood or drainage damage. Any costs associated with these conflicts
and potential relocations of utilities shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider.
The Subdivider hereby petitions the City to construct lateral and trunk sanitary sewer mains and
appurtenances, lateral and trunk watermains and appurtenances, sanitary sewer service leads, water
service leads, lateral and trunk storm sewer and appurtenances, curb and gutter, street grading,
street base, street surfacing, street signs and lighting, and appurtenances to serve the entire plat.
2. It is understood and agreed that the improvements in Paragraph No. 1 will be installed by the City
under one or more contracts. Phase 1 improvements are proposed for 1997. It is understood and
agreed that the City will have the right to extend watermain to complete the loop between West
Shore Drive and Prairie View Drive if an acceptable quality of the potable water, or quantity of
water for fire protection, can not be provided. These costs shall be assessed equally to all
properties not included in Phase 1. It is also agreed and understood that bituminous wear course
construction for Phase 1 shall be constructed and assessed after 60% of all homes are constructed,
but no later than December 31, 2000.
3. It is understood and agreed that the total cost of said improvements in Paragraph No. 1 shall include
contracted costs, city administration and engineering costs and capitalized interest cost.
• 4. It is understood and agreed that the total cost of said improvements in Paragraph No. 1 shall be
assessed on a per unit basis for all costs associated with said plat. All assessments will be divided
among the lots as follows:
Phase 1
Block 1, Lots 1 through I 1 (single- family)
2.5 units/each
27.5 units
Block 2, Lots 1 through 5 (single - family)
2.5 units/each
12.5 units
Blocks 3 & 4 (twin home, three -plex)
1 unit/each
5 units
Block 26 through 50 (52 twin homes)
1 unit/each
52 units
Total Units 101 units
2
Per unit, equally, based on the total units served
5. It is agreed and understood that each lot shall pay a Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain
connection fee. This fee will compensate the City for improvements required to provide Trunk
Sanitary Sewer and Watermain access to the plat property boundary. This fee shall be collected
at the time of building permit issuance, and shall be at the rate in place at the time of permit
issuance. The rates for 1997 twin homes and three plexes will be $490 per unit for Sanitary Sewer
and $260 per unit for Watermain, or as approved by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson.
• All single - family parcels under Yz acre in size will be at the same rates. All single - family parcels -
over Yz acre in size shall be assessed $540 for Sanitary Sewer and $320 for Watermain, or as
IVH2 -Page 3
approved by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson. Parcels over 3/4 of an acre may be
• charged higher rates.
6. It is understood and agreed that any agreements regarding the method and procedure for
assessments from municipal improvements shall, at the sole option of the City, cease to be effective
thirty six months following approval of the Subdivision Agreement by the City. The City may
exercise the option granted herein by giving written notice at any time, either before or after the
expiration of the thirty six month period, of the City's intention to nullify the method and procedure
for spreading assessments under the terms of the Subdivision Agreement. In the event the City so
elects, all assessments subsequent to the notice shall be spread and imposed pursuant to Chapter
429 of Minnesota Statutes or other applicable laws. The written notice called for by this paragraph
shall be given to the fee owner of the property as disclosed by the records of the McLeod County
Recorder or Registrar of Titles.
1. It is understood and agreed, that a Parks and Playground Contribution will be made to the City.
The contribution shall be partially based on dedication of park land, as noted in the preliminary
plat, and the remainder as payment in lieu of dedication. Open Space Dedication is 7.5% of the
gross acreage of R -1 zoning areas, and 12% of the gross acreage of R -2 zoning areas. In lieu of
additional land dedication, a cash contribution at the rate noted in the Municipal Code at the time
of construction shall be paid. The current ordinance calls for a payment in lieu of dedication of
$175 per unit in R -2 zoning areas and $215 in R -1 zoning areas. It is agreed and understood that
the Parks, Recreation and Community Education (PRCE) Advisory Board must provide approval
• for the final contribution.
2. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall pay a fee of $800 per lot for single family
residents and $800 /unit for structures with up to 4 units as a municipal electric service access
charge, as noted by agreements with McLeod Cooperative Power Association (Coop). These fees
shall be collected with the building permit for all properties, unless otherwise noted in the
agreement with McLeod Cooperative Power Association. The checks shall he made out directly
to the "McLeod Cooperative Power Association ".
3. It is understood and agreed that the Subdivider shall, prior to installation of utilities, pay
connection fees for Electric and Gas Service to Hutchinson Utilities for all units to be served in the
final plat. These costs are $200 /unit for Electric Service, and $150 /unit for Gas Service, or as in
effect with Hutchinson Utilities at the time of development. These fees include the standard
connection to each house, and include required meters. Services larger than the standard residential
sizes will be at an additional cost.
4. It is understood and agreed that all street lights not located within street rights -of -way shall be
individually metered and charged to the Association.
1. It is understood and agreed that no building permits will be issued for building construction prior
• to the utility and street improvement project completion, unless the Subdivider provides a separate
access to the building site that does not interfere with utility and street construction. Any damage
IVH2 -Page 4
that occurs to areas within the improvement project due to building construction shall be the
responsibility of the Subdivider to correct.
• 2. It is understood and agreed that all local, state and federal permits required to be obtained for the
development shall be the responsibility of the Subdivider.
3. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and
successors of the parties.
4. It is understood and agreed that the City shall record this agreement at the McLeod County
Recorder's Office or McLeod County Registrar of Titles Office, and that no Building Permits will
be issued until said Agreement is recorded and a certified copy of this agreement is provided to the
City. All costs associated with said recording shall be paid by the Subdivider.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, has hereunto set its hand this day of _ 1997.
Scenic Heights Investment
William H. Gilk, Partner
• STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
•
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of by
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , by
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
My Commission Expires
IVH2 -Page 5
APPROVED BY THE HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL THE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
DAY OF
GARY D. PLOTZ, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
STATE OF MINNESOTA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of
COUNTY OF 1997, by Marlin Torgerson, Mayor and Gary D. Plotz,
City Administrator of the City of Hutchinson.
Notary Public, County, Minnesota
• My Commission Expires
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
612- 234 -4208
•
IVH2 -Page 6
c
-ME M (
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
G. Barry Anderson, City Attorney
RE: Discussion of Adopting "Model Right -of -Way Ordinance"
DATE: August 7, 1997
Attached separately is a copy of the "Model Right -of -Way Ordinance" prepared
cooperatively by the City Engineer's Association of Minnesota and the League of
Minnesota Cities. This document is based on legislation recently passed that details
rules, rights and obligations of utility companies working in City right -of -way. We
believe that this ordinance is essential for protecting the quality of our infrastructure.
We propose to revise this ordinance to the needs of the community, and will be
presenting this document back to the Council at a date in the near future. We will
cooperatively work with Hutchinson Utilities and Hutchinson Telephone to make
sure that requirements are fair and reasonable.
Please let us know if you have any preliminary questions or comments.
• City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, AIN 55350 -1522
(320) 587 -5151
Fax (320) 2344240
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -3097 �(
(320) 587 -2975 1/
Fax (320) 2344240 Q
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2464
G (320) 587 -2242
Fax (320) 587 -6427
Printed on recycled paper -
CI
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MEMO
Finance Department
August 8, 1997
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
FROM: KEN MERRILL, FINANCE DIRECTOR
•I •::. ••
Budget requested numbers for 1998 are in place for the general fund
and under reviewed by the directors. New this next year are tax
• levy limits.
I would like to review the budget schedule, the new tax law and
answer any questions the council may have regarding the process.
One issue city directors are trying to deal with is how to
prioritize. Feed back from the council as to how they would see
priorities being set would be helpful. ,
It would be my request to set a city council workshop beginning at
4 p.m. on Tuesday,August 26, 1997 for the above purpose.
•
�J
• .MARILYN J SWANSON
From:
BONNIE J BAUMETZ
To:
MARILYN J SWANSON
Cc:
GARY D PLOTZ; JAMES MARKA
Subject:
ADDING A 7TH MEMBER ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Date:
Thursday, July 17, 1997 11:45AM
The Planning Staff is recommending that the planning commission return to a 7 member board. Jim has
discussed this with Marlin and was directed to ask you to begin the process of changing the ordinance to a
7 member board. We also would recommend that Joe Drahos be appointed to fill that position. Call me if
you have questions. Thanks.
r
L A
is
Page 1 ¢�
PUBLICATION NO. •
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -204
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.51 OF THE HUTCHINSON
CITY CODE ENTITLED "PLANNING COMMISSION' BY CHANGING
CERTAIN LANGUAGE THERETO AND ADOPTING BY
REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. City Code Section 2.51, Subd. 1, entitled "Establishment and Composition" is
hereby amended as follows:
SEC. 2.51
Subd. 1 "Establishment and Composition." A Planning Commission is hereby
established. The Planning Commission shall be composed of seven ai* members of which give
shall be residents of the City, but not members of a public body who shall serve staggered 5 -year
terms, and one member of the Council shall be appointed by the Mayor to serve terms expiring on
March 31 of each year. The Mayor and the City Attorney shall be ex- officio members. •
Section 2. City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to
the Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of August, 1997.
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
•
-1
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
TUESDAY, APRIL 15, 1997
• ORDINANCE NO, 97- 189.2` SERIES
PUBLICATION NO. 5020
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2.51 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE
ENTITLED "PLANNING COMMISSION' BY DELETING CERTAIN LANGUAGE THERETO
AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 2.99 WHICH,
AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY OF HUTCBTNSON ORDAINS:
Section 1: City Code Section 2.51, Subd. 1, entitled "Establishment and Composition' is
hereby amended as follows:
SEC. 2.51
Subd. 1 "Establishment and Composition." A Planning Commission is hereby
established. The Planning Commission shall be composed ofseven members of which five shall
be residents of the City, but not members of a public body who shall serve staggered 5 -year terms,
and one member of the Council and one menibe. of die Public Utilities Commission shall be appointed
by the Mayor to serve terms expiring on March 31 of each year. The Mayor and the City Attorney
shall be ex- officio members.
• Section 2: City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the
Entire City Code Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 2.99 entitled "Violation a
Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety, by reference, as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 8th day of April, 1997.
in Torgerson, ayor
Attest:
(?,qd,4 M4 JV
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
First reading: March 25, 1997
Second reading: April 8. 1997
Published in the Hutchinson Leader on: Tuesday, April 15, 1997
U
OPEN -HOLD
COUNCIL
REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997,
2:13 PM
$415.92
page 1
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
1988
IMPROV. BDS
FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA
INTEREST PAYMENT
$13,700.00
is
< *>
UNIFORMS
$13,700.00*
1995
IMPRO CONST
OSM
PROFESS SERV -LUCE LINE
$98.00
CREDIT
< *>
1
AUG LIFE
$98.00*
1996
IMPRO CONST
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP
PROFESS SERV - BRIDGE PROJECT
$225.00
REPAIR A/C
1,074.38
WM MUELLER & SONS
L7/96 EST 9
$9,323.62
ELEMENT
<*>
BED MAT
$9,548.62*
1997 IMPR. CONST QUAM CONSTRUCTION
SEH
WM MUELLER & SONS
CENTRAL GARAGE
• < *>
GENERAL FUND
•
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO
BRANDON TIRE CO
CARQUEST AUTO PARTS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FORTIS BENEFITS
G & K SERVICES
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
M.S. SHARPENING SERVICE
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
MN MUTUAL LIFE
MODERN MAZDA
MOTOR VEHICLE
PLOWMANS
RIDGEWATER COLLEGE
RMS
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
SUPERIOR FORD INC
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
TOWN & COUNTRY TIRE
TWO WAY COMM INC
US POSTAL SERVICE
A.J.SCHAAKE CO.
AAGARD WEST
ACCU FINANCIAL SERVICES
ADOLPH KIEFER
AG SYSTEMS
ALLEN OFFICE PROD
AMERICAN RED CROSS
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
BAHR, SUE
BAILEY NURSERIES
BCA /FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATOR
BENNETT OFFICE SUP.
BERKLEY RISK SERVICES
BIG BEAR
BONDHUS, DEBRA
BRAUN INTERTEC CORP
BREMIX CONCRETE CO
BRINKMAN STUDIO
BROWNELLS INC
BUSINESS ADVANTAGE INC
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY
CAMERA SHOP
CARLSON, CORY
CARLSON, KRISTIE
CARR FLOWERS
CASH WISE
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CENTRAL GARAGE
CENTURY LABS
CHRISTENSEN PIANO SERVICE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COAST TO COAST
L1/97 EST 5 $11,375.92
PROFESS SERV -MAIN ST SIGNALS $633.66
L6/97 EST 1 $20,214.86
$32,224.44*
COUPLER
$49.01
TIRE, MOUNT /DISMNT
$415.92
FILTERS
$534.72
AUG RED
$432.09
AUG LTD
$20.36
UNIFORMS
$69.55
SCREWS, CLEANER
$358.25
SHARPENING BITS
$21.23
CREDIT
$259.58
AUG LIFE
$7.14
TOW CHEV PICKUP
$17.04
LIC & REG -1998 FORD VAN -PARK
1,300.74
REPAIR A/C
1,074.38
WORKSTUDY
$198.75
ELEMENT
$69.68
BED MAT
,563.89
97 FORD TRUCK
$15,438.00
OPERATING SUPPLIES
$88.96
TIRE REPAIR
$14.20
RED WIRE, ANT & COAX
$103.76
JULY POSTAGE
$11.84
$20,549.09*
PLAQUE LOGO & LETTERS
$89.14
JULY PICKUPS- POLICE DEPT
998.31
HELMETS
280.50
T- SHIRTS & TANKS
185.71
1270.99
HOSE, CLAMP, COUPLER
BLACK STAMPER INK
$31.05
ADULT, JR, INF
$32.48
JULY COMPENSATION
$6,866.00
REFUND - MOTORCYCLE TRAIN
$85.00
TREES
$668.61
REG -ROGER BAKKEN
$360.00
CLEAN COPIER, MILEAGE, LABOR
$126.38
AUG PROFESS CONSULTING
$800.00
HARDWARE
$63.71
REFUND - CANCEL LIQUID LINE DNCE
$12.00
PROFESS SERV -PVMT MGMT SYSTEM
$7,811.00
CEMENT, TILE CAP, TYPE M MASON
38.09
FILM PROCESS
27.32
GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES
50.62
SUPPORT MATERIALS
243.08
TRANSPY FILM
179.99
MARS METRIC TRAAN. SCAL
126.72
DEVELOP & PRINT
$29.91
GAMES WORKED
$112.00
REFUND POOL RENTAL
$30.00
PLANT -P GRAVES
$27.44
POP
$319.94
LABELS, FOLDERS, BINDERS
$309.53
JULY REPAIRS
$6,203.47
LINERS
$455.46
TUNING
$60.00
JUNE LODGING TAX
$51,967.76
KEY
$91.80
/o -7 1
OPEN -HOLD
COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997, 2:13
PM
page 2
- ___- - - -___
GENERAL FUND
--------------------------------------------------
CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA GROUP
------- ------------------
JULY ADS IN BULLETIN
$198.80
------
-
•
CORWINE, BILL
COUNTRY KITCHEN
GAMES WORKED
MEALS
$208.00
$27.03
CRONIN, KIM
UMPIRE GAME
$16.00
CROSS, KARLA
REFUND - SWISHER CAMP CANCELLED
$22.00
CROW RIVER GLASS
GLASS
$1,132.65
CROW RIVER VET CLINIC
JULY SERVICES
$610.23
CULLIGAN WATER COND
SOLAR SALT
$14.06
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR REG FEES
$615.00
DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
INSPECTION
$10.00
DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY -OISM
CONNECT & OPERATIONS CHARGES
$390.00
DOMINO'S PIZZA
PIZZAS, POP
$163.92
DON HUME
BW BLK, GLOVE HOLDER
$783.60
EBERHARDT, SUE
REFUND- CANCEL CHILD'S PLAY
$16.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM
JULY SERVICE
922.37
EVESLAGE, JOE
TOURNAMENT WORKER
$35.00
FALLON, JAMIE
TOURNAMENT REFUND
$100.00
FAMILY RRXALL DRUG
PHOTOS
$42.24
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF MINNEA
REG -D LENNES, M SCHAUFLER
$40.00
FEED RITE CONTROLS
CHLORINE, LYNDE STAIN & SCALE
$342.27
FLESSLAND, LARRY
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$26.00
FLOM, BRIAN
REFUND - CANCEL FROM TWINS GAME
$9.00
FORTIS BENEFITS
AUG LTD
$1,646.21
FRASER, KAKI
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$18.00
FROEMMING, AMY
GYMNASTIC INSTRUCTOR
$80.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$1,339.41
GEMPLER'S INC
RAINWEAR
$221.55'
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO
STAPLER, BINDER
$134.32
GIESE, RICK
UMPIRE
$48.00
GOSNELL, GALE
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$13.00
GOVT TRAINING SER
REG -MARK HENSEN
$60.00
GREAT PLAINS SUPPLY
GLOBE SUPER SEALS
$202.30
GRIMM, DAVID
REFUND - MOTORCYCLE TRAIN
85.00
GRINA, LISA
REIMB -POST ITS, TAPE
60.66
HAGER JEWELRY
NAME TAGS
39.57
HAL AUAN PATRICK
GAMES WORKED
$255.00
HANSEN GRAVEL
1/2 YARD GRAVEL
$60.95
HANSEN TRUCK SERVICE
HOSE & ENDS
$13.34
HCVN -TV
APRIL -JUNE FRANCHISE PAYMENT
$8,181.84
HED, MARILYN
REIMB - OFFICE SUPPLIES
52.32
•
HENNEN, MIKE
REFUND - CANCEL FROM FOOTBALL
28.00
HEMMAH, LLOYD
REIMB - TRAVEL EXPENSES
26.00
144.00
HENDERSON -REED, KARI
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
HENRYS FOODS INC
CANDY, SLUSH BASE
$844.61
HIGGINBOTHAM, RUTH
HOURS WORKED
$50.00
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
TOWELS
$1,167.13
HUTCH COOP CENEX
LP GAS
$116.82
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
EXTING INSPEC
$263.76
HUTCH FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSC.
BUDGETED CONTRIBUTIONS
$18,000.00
HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO
PVC ADAPTOR
$111.46
HUTCHINSON LEADER
ADS
$1,564.69
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
AUG SERVICE
$7,318.90
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JULY GAS & ELEC
$6,098.26
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
WIRE KIT
$26.26
ICMA
ADD'L PAYMENT
$36.00
IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES
UNIT SET UP, DELIVERY & RENT
$65.45
INK SPOTS
LINEN PAPER
$356.64
ISIA
ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP DUES
$175.00
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
REPAIR FLOURESC FIXTURES
$93.45
JERRYS TRANSMISSION
TWIST LOCK STROBE
$68.34
JOSS SPORT SHOP
SHIRTS
$179.00
JOHANSON, CINDY
REFUND - CANCEL RIBBON & DANCE
$8.00
JOKELA, DUACE
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$13.00
KERN, SUSAN
PARTIAL REFUND
KING, TOM
PARK CONCESSION
3 $15.00
72.50
KOTTKE, MARY
PARTIAL REFUND
$15.00
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
REMOTE CONTROL
$40.85
L & P SUPPLY CO
SCREW
$104.11
LARSON, QUENTIN
REIMB -MEALS
$4.40
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
DEDUCTIBLE OWED
$607.00
LEE, WALTER
REFUND- SWISHER CAMP
$35.00
LERN, GAIL
REIMB- TRAVEL FEES
$6.00
LENNES, RICHARD
JULY COMPENSATION
$2,407.42
LITTLE DUKES
CAR WASHES
$110.00
LONCORICH, BARB
REIMB- SHELTER RESERVATION
$15.00
LYKE, GREGORY
LIFEGUARD
$35.63
r - 1
LJ
OPEN -HOLD
COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997,
2:13 PM
page 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL FUND
MADSON, STEVEN
REIMB - MEALS, LODGING
$473.60
--
MARKA, JAMES
REIMB -MEALS
$36.23
•
MCCLURE, JASON
REIMB- EYEGLASS LENSE
$35.68
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
COFFEE
$142.52
MCGRAW, SHEILA
REFUND - SWISHER CAMP CANCELLED
$30.00
MCLEOD COUNTY - SHERIFF'S OFFI
SAFE & SOBER GRANT REIMB
$5,145.45
MCLEOD COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES
REFUND - CANCEL TWINS GAME
$14.00
MEEKER SAND & GRAVEL
SAND
$851.25
MEMINDEX
CALENDARS
$131.18
MERRILL, KENNETH B.
REIMB -GAS PURCHASED
$7.00
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
PLATE ANCHOR
$2,276.33
METRO SALES
TONER
$114.97
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
BLACK TOP
$3,223.24
MILLER, MARVIN
UMPIRE GAMES
$144.00
MINN BLUE DIGITAL -A
TONER
$
MINNCOMM PAGING
AUG SERVICE
152.25
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
KEYS TOT -4
$40.73
MN ELEVATOR INC.
ELEVATOR SERVICE
$71.02
MN MUTUAL LIFE
MATTSFIELD -COBRA LIFE
$578.97
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
MEMBERSHIP DEWS
$175.00
MN U C FUND
QTR 2 1997
$50.73
MORE 4 -
CLEANERS
$362.77
MRAZ, KIM
PARTIAL POOL REFUND
$30.00
MUELLER, BEV
PARTIAL REFUND
$15.00
MUSIC STORE, THE
SCANNER
$106.50
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO
ADJUSTING RING
$271.58
NICKLASSON ATHLETIC CO
BATS
$163.96
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
HARDWARE
$60.98
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
PUSH BROOM, DRYWALL SCREEN
$16.99
OAK 'CREEK PRODUCTS
UNIFORMS
$135.45
PANNING, LYNN
PARTIAL REFUND
$15.00
PARTIES PLUS
POM POMS, STARS
$54.99
PEARCE, JOSHUA
REIMB SAFETY BOOTS
$60.00
PEHLE, BRANDY
REIMB- CANCEL RIBBON & DANCE
$8.00
PIONEER
QUIK STRIPE ARCTIC
$303.53
PIZZA HUT
CHERRY DESSERT PIZZA
$30.31
PRIEVE LANDSCAPING
CRAB TREE
$32.00
Q MIDWEST INC
WIPER BLADES
$5.21
QUADE ELECTRIC
MATERIALS, LABOR -HUTCH SIGN
$140.29
QUANTUM LABS
QUANTUM BLUE LABEL
$74.10
•
R&R SPECIALTIES INC
HYD FILTER, ICE BLADE
$516.61
RAITZ, BARB
PARTIAL REFUND
$15.00
RESPOND SYSTEMS
SAFETY SUPPLIES
$153.70
RIDER BENNETT EGAN & ARUNDEL
PROFESS SERV THRU 6/30/97
$234.25
RIDGEWATER COLLEGE
WORKSTUDY
$486.25
RIGHT WAY BUILDERS
MATERIALS & LABOR VAULT DOOR
$75.00
RUNKE, BRUCE
REIMB- MILEAGE, MEALS, LODGING
$350.07
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
HOOKS, BELTS
$312.53
RYAN, SCOTT
GAMES WORKED
$240.00
SCHRADER, JEFF
UMPIRE GAMES
$96.00
SCHROEDER, RANDY
REFUND - CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$13.00
SCHULTE, DARLA
REFUND - TOURNAMENT FEE
$100.00
SCHULTZ, ERIC
REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS
$60.00
SCHWANS SALES ENTERPRISES INC
ICE CREAM
$417.90
SEVEN WEST WASH & DRY
LAUNDRY
$54.37
SHOPKO
STL PAD, WOOD NATURAL
$40.43
SICKMANN, CHRISTINE
REFUND- TRAVEL FEES
SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY
STUD, SPRING, BUFFER, LEVER
$ $43.00
22.70
STANDARD PRINTING
PENCILS, COLUMN PAD
70.34
STAR TRIBUNE
PAPER THRU 11/26/97
26.00
SUBWAY
PARTY PLATTER, CHIPS, POP
40.16
SURPLUS SERVICES
MONITOR, JACKET
$16.00
TEMPLETON INC
ER CONTRIB JULY 1997
$248.51
THE SALTMAN
SOFTNER SALT
$142.76
TKDA
PROFESS SERV- AIRPORT PHASE II
$31,907.86
TRI CO WATER COND
SALT
52.72
TRIPLE G DISTRIBUTING INC
POP
28.80
TWO WAY COMM INC
FILTER
99.35
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
$331.46
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
CONCRETE MIX
$701.29
US POSTAL SERVICE
JULY POSTAGE
$1,056.05
US WEST COMMUN
AUG SERVICE
$654.70
USI INC
CLEAR POUCH
$63.75
VALLEY ILLUMINATORS
ELEVATED EDGE MARKERS
$192.00
VIKING COCA COLA
POP
$909.50
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
LASER CRTRDG, FAX ROLLS
$97.96
r 1
�J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL
REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997, 2:13
PM
page 4
________________ _________
GENERAL FUND
___________ ___________
VIKING SIGNS
_______
SIGN FOR TENNIS COURTS
______- _---
$63.90
_________
VOSS LIGHTING
OPERATING SUPPLIES
$109.11
-
WAL -MART
FUSES, CONNECT, HOLDER
$30.08
WENDORFF, CINDY
REIMB -SWIM CLASS CHANGED
$5.66
WENDORFF, TRUDY
REFUND- CANCEL SHELTER RESERV
$15.00
WHITE, MARY
REFUND- CANCEL SHELTER RESERV
$13.00
WILLIAMS, COLIN
GAMES WORKED
$288.00
WITTE SANITATION
JULY SERVICE
$63.37
WOLLACK & ASSOCIATES INC
ALERT /PAF LAW ENFORC EXAMS
$822.58
WOODWORTH, SHERYL
REFUND- CANCEL SWIM LESSONS
$39.00
ZASKE, BARBARA
REFUND- CANCEL POWER SKATE
$20.00
ZILLMER, RICK
UMPIRE GAMES
$176.00
ZUMACH, LOUIE
EXTENSION FOR COMPUTER TABLE
$30.00
< *>
$193,757.20*
HUTCH TRANS FAC.
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$278.82
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
TOWELS
$96.13
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
EXTING INSPEC, RECHARGE, TESTS
$231.82
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
AUG SERVICE
$237.30
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JULY GAS & ELEC
$1,544.74
KLEESPIE
SUPPLIES, LABOR, TRIP CHARGE
$226.83
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
COFFEE
$35.63
QUADE ELECTRIC
LABOR - OVERHEAD DOOR
$79.56
SCHMELING OIL CO
AUTOMATIC SHUT OFF NOZZEL
,535.13
US POSTAL SERVICE
JULY POSTAGE
$0.32
< *>
$2,766.28*
LIQUOR STORE
AAGARD WEST
AUG PICKUP
$45.20
AM.LINEN SUPPLY CO
JULY DELIVERIES
$131.52
BERNICKS PEPSI COLA
POP PURCHASE
$317.95
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
JULY PURCHASES
$136.13
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
AUG MED
$1,053.13
COAST TO COAST
BULB
$6.81
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
JULY WINE PURCHASE
$3,713.80
FORTIS BENEFITS
AUG LTD
$39.70
GRIGGS & COOPER TOBACCO DIV
JULY TOBACCO PURCHASE
$349.96
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$14,520.48
HENRYS FOODS INC
JULY OPERATING SUPPLIES
$2,617.29
HERMEL WHOLESALE
JULY PURCHASES
$193.13
HUTCHINSON LEADER
JULY ADS
$154.31
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
AUG SERVICE
$127.27
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JULY GAS & ELEC
$1,200.48
INSURANCE PLANNERS
LIQUOR AUDIT
$399.00
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
JULY WINE PURCHASE
$13,634.61
JORDON BEVERAGE INC.
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$3,050.10
KARP RADIO _
JULY ADS
$6.00
LEHMANN FARMS
MISC PURCHASE
$100.31
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$4,681.10
LOCHER BROS INC
JULY MISC PURCHASE
$14,502.35
LUNDHOLM, LORI
CLEAN WINDOWS
$42.60
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
COFFEE
$33.25
MN MUTUAL LIFE
AUG LIFE
,514.07
MORE 4
TISSUE
$29.38
PINNACLE DISTRIB
MISC PURCHASE
$42.00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
AUG LIQUOR PURCHASE
$3,732.39
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY
JULY PURCHASES
$307.54
TOTAL REGISTER INC
SOFTWARE UPDATE
$78.52
TRI CO WATER COND
JULY WATER DELIVERIES
$57.98
TRIPLE G DISTRIBUTING INC
JULY BEER PURCHASE
$18,533.80
US POSTAL SERVICE
JULY POSTAGE
$20.56
VIKING COCA COLA
JULY POP PURCHASES
$477.10
< *>
$84,349.82*
PUBLIC SITES
MCLEOD COOP POWER
2 ELEC HOOK -UPS
$2,400.00
r
< >
$2,400.00*
RURAL F. D.
BRODD, JIM
RURAL MILEAGE
$21.30
EMANS, BRAD
RURAL MILEAGE
$36.90
FORCIER, GARY
RURAL MILEAGE
$13.20
HOMAN, ED
RURAL MILEAGE
$30.60
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
EXTINGUISHER, BRACKET
$113.93
HUTCH FIRE DEPT RELIEF ASSC.
BUDGETED CONTRIBUTIONS
$5,683.00
rI
L J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997, 2:13 PM page 5
--------------------- .-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RURAL F. D. NIES, JEFF RURAL MILEAGE $42.90
REDMAN, RANDY RURAL MILEAGE - $15.00
SCHRAMM, STEVE RURAL MILEAGE $8.70
STEELE, DAN RURAL MILEAGE $24.00
< *> $5,989.53*
SCDP 97 Heg Reh GRASAVAGE, BILL
WATER /SEWER FUND
40
AAGARD WEST
AG SYSTEMS
ALL SEASONS
BRANDON TIRE CO
BUCHEN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CARR FLOWERS
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CENTRAL GARAGE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CULLIGAN WATER COND
CURTIS 1000
D.P.C.IND.INC
DYNA SYSTEMS
ENVIROTECH PUMP SYSTEMS
ERICKSON & TEMPLIN
FAMILY REXALL DRUG
FARMERS ELEVATOR ASSN
FORTIS BENEFITS
G & K SERVICES
HACH COMPANY
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
HUTCHINSON LEADER
HUTCHINSON TEL CO '
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES
INFRATECH
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
JUUL CONTRACTING CO
KRUEGER, DAN
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
MCGARVEY COFFEE INC
METTLER TOLEDO INC
MID CON SYSTEMS INC
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MN MUTUAL LIFE
MN VALLEY TESTING LAB
NATURTECH COMPOSTING
NCL
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
QUADE ELECTRIC
RESPOND SYSTEMS
ROWEKAMP ASSOC
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
RUST ENVIRONMENT
SAFETY FIRST
SCHRAMM IMPLEMENT
SEMBLEX
SHOPKO
STANDARD PRINTING
TRI CO WATER COND
TWO WAY COMM INC
US FILTER /DAVIS PROCESS
US FILTER /WATERPRO
US POSTAL SERVICE
USA WASTE SERVICES INC
WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP -
WESTERN AUTO
WITTE SANITATION
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
JULY PICKUP
FITTING, HOSE
REIMB - OVERPAYMENT WATER KEY
TIRES, MOUNT /DISMNT
STORM & SANITARY INSPEC
PLANT -G IVERSON
LABELS
JULY REPAIRS
AUG MED
SOFTNER RENTAL
ENVELOPES
SULFUR DIOXIDE, CHLORINE
PIN LYNCH
SEALS, SLEEVE, O -RING
STANDPIPE - CHICAGO AVE LOCAT
MUSKOL
WEIGHING
AUG LTD
UNIFORMS
LAB SUPPLIES
LEAD METER SEALS, GASKETS
WATER REST ORD
AUG SERVICE
JULY GAS & ELEC
SPARK PLUGS
UNIT RENTAL
SANITARY & STORM LINES
LABOR, MATERIALS
HYDRANT, BACKHOE
REIMB- CLOSING BILL PAID TWI
WASTE BAGS
RETURN GRABBER WELD, CABLE
COFFEE
LABOR ELEC TOPLOADER
MULTI SEAL
WELDING TIPS, CASTERS
AUG LIFE
WATER TESTS
REIMB - TRAVEL EXPENSES
LAB SUPPLIES
WELDING TIPS, FUEL TANK
PLUG
SAFETY SUPPLIES
ARCVIEW FOR WINDOWS 3.0
GLOVES
LABOR - NORTH HIGH LIFT STAT
PROCEDURES & TRAINING #10
WHEEL
PLAY -DRY
COOLER, HAMPER, OUTLETS
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
SALT
BATTERY
MOBILIZATION FEE
ECR METER
JULY POSTAGE
LOADS 7/14 - 7/18
MECH SEAL, SLEEVE, GASKET
SOCKETS, WRENCHES, PLIERS
TRUCK TIME & LABOR
ION
CE
ION
$154.94
$154.94*
$28,409
$67
20
$408
$4,443
$21
$107
$148
$4,266
$916
$944
$16
$1,118
$45
$5
$25
$214
$479
93
93
35
$700
$25,207
$49
$800
$93
$1,269
$141
$ $40
325
176
1100
$74
B 136
338
$192
$310
$80
$115
$1,028
$220
$6,104
$632
$134
$33
86
84
35
179
$532
$9,914
$432
$3,960
$1,437
$85
$256
$97,098
$462,636
O8
93
00
83
30
30
07
49
71
00
30
65
40
75
39
10
00
16
45
14
05
97
91
50
31
53
00
32
00
29
95
81
80
00
18
73
97
00
74
64
82
99
80
79
50
74
00
12
39
18
67
96
88
50
10
23
08
99
02
25
14*
06*
C ,
J
IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT TUE, AUG 12, 1997, 2:13 PM
page 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL FUND
CELLULAR 2000
JULY CELL SERVICE
$911.74
COMM TRANSPORTATION
LOAN PAYMENT
700.00
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR FEES TO STATE
$1,477.00
GRINA, LISA
REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE
$59.33
HENSEN, MARK
REIMS- MEALS, MILEAGE
51,27
HUTCHINSON JAYCEES
WAL MART FOUNDATION
$4,000.00
MARKA, JAMES
REIMB -MEALS
.$8.34
MUELLER, DAVE
REIMB- MILEAGE
$40.30
RODEBERG, JOHN
REIMB- MEALS, PARKING
53.67
ST. CLOUD AREA CVB
SR. TOUR
5.00
ST. JOHN'S ABBEY -SR.
TOUR
46.00
ST. JOHN'S DINING SERVICE
SR. DINNER
$276.00
TRACY, ELLEN
GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR
$$175.00 -
TRIAX CABLEVISION
JULY SERVICE
$3..93
VAN KLEY, ALICIA
GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR
$107.50
< *>
$7,925.08* -
LIQUOR STORE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON - GENERAL FUN
PAYROLL 8/1/97
$7,364.46
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
LIQUOR FROM 2/11/97 INVOICE
$311.49
LUNDHOLM, LORI
CLEAN WINDOWS
$42`.60
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$2,1.06.83
TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE
BALANCE OF ADS
$243 .00 -
` *'
$10,068..38*
PAYROLL FUND
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS, CO.
BE CONTRIB
$850.00
AMERICAN EXPRESS
BE CONTRIB
904.71
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
BE CONTRIB
100.00
H.R.L.A.P.R.
BE CONTRIB
$164..00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
HE CONTRIB
$2,680.38
PERA LIFE INS CO.
BE CONTRIH
$118+.50
PERA- D.C.P.
BE CONTRIB
$52.02
PRUDENTIAL
BE CONTRIB
$180.00
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
BE CONTRIB
$30.00
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
BE CONTRIB
$15,265.44
TEMPLETON INC
BE CONTRIB
$458.46
WADELL & REED
BE CONTRIB
$150.00
< *�
_
$20,953 ^.51*
ER /SEWER FUND
CELLULAR. 2000
JULY CELLULAR SERVICE
$27.20 -
JONNY'S RESTAURANT
OPENING DINNER
$293.00
RED RIVER INN
MWOA 21ST ANNUAL CONFE
$150.00
US FILTER /DAMS PROCESS
BIOXIDE
$1,060.74
US FILTER /WATERPRO
26" VLV BOX TOP SECTION
$383.51
USA WASTE SERVICES INC
LOADS 7/7 TO 7
$2,258.13
< *>
$4,172.58*
$43,119.55*
WIRE TRANSFERS
Withholding Taxes - Payroll $36,701.28
MN Dept of Revenue - Payroll 7,326.25
HUTCHINSON
FIRE DEPARTMENT
205 Third Avenue South East
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350
MONTHLY COUNCIL UPDATE
JULY 1997
The Fire Department responded to 40 calls for service in July, 225 to date.
P.M. , 1 1. 1 1 VITTORK M
5 Residential
6 Commercial/Industrial
7 Multi - family
2 Rescue
1 Hazardous Material
1 Vehicle
2 Carbon Monoxide
2 Sky Warn
p ral T T 1 0 1. 1 1' I
2
Residential
• I
Commercial/Industrial
2
Farm Buildings
4
Rescue
2
Medical
1
Grass
I
Carbon Monoxide
1
Good Will
Drills/Meetings for July
SCBA's
Fire Prevention
High Level Rescue
Live Burn/House
Regional Meeting
•
C�
Hutchinson Safety Council
Issm 497 -1 •,July 1997
9
Meeting
Agenda:
County Fair
Minutes
Noon Meal
Special Guest
Speaker
Discussion
THE MONTHS
MEETING WILL BE
HELD ON
July 28th
AT
THE ELKS LODGE
The Safety Council will be
sharing an information
booth with the Fire
Department, State Patrol,
local and County Law
Enforcement this year at
the 1997 McLeod County
Fair. It is very important
that we get as many
volunteers as possible this
year to work at the booth
from the Safety Council.
There will be a sign up at
the July meeting for
members to choose the times
they would like to work.
Times that are not filled,
w I I be
assigned to
members by
the Safety
Council
President.
The June meeting of the
Hutchinson Safety Council
was held on the 30th at the
Elks 'Lodge, with the
following topics being
discussed:
- Safety recall due to a
possible fire hazard on '95-
96 Mitsubishi Eclipse (model
5731 cars made 3/94 -
7/96.
- Safety recall on 21,000
"Master Tech" 6' white
extension cords due to a
possible fire and
electrocution hazard (the
cord is marked "SPT -1
18AWGX2X 80*q.
- Booth at the county fair on
Aug. 15th -19th.
•
0
•
Hutchinson Safety
FAIR
1997 McLeod
county fair
® reminder that the safety
council will having a joint
booth this year with the
fire department, state patrol,
local and county law
enforcement.
Attached to this
monthly newsletter are the
times members will need to be
at the booth. If you are unable
to meet the times assigned,
you will be responsible for
locating a replacement to
cover the shift.
It is very Important
that the booth have a member
present during open hours of
the fair to answer questions.
}
Council
(SEPTEMBER MEETING 11
THE NEXT
MEETING WILL BE
SEPTEMBER 29th,
AT THE ELKS
LODGE.
[JULY MEETING MINUTES 11
- Discussion on the following
topics:
• County Fair booth.
• Site problem at Jorgenson
and Hassan intersection.
• Possible new ordinance on
bikes and roller blades on
main street.
• Parking regulations in front of
Jefferson apartments.
• Progress of new paved path
near river.
• Operation false alarm.
• Recalls on extension cords.
• October 5 — 11, National Fire
Prevention week this year.
• Severe weather siren policy
and procedures.
• Blood mobile In Hutch. In
August.
JULY ATTENDANCE
10 Members Total
Tom Kloss, Jim Haasl,
Myron Johnson, Kay
Peterson, Loretta Pishney,
James Popp, Les Smith,
Lucille Smith, Casey Stotts,
June Wick.
THERE WILL NOT BE A
AUGUST MEETING DUE T
THE MCLEOD COUNTY FAI
BOOTH.
HUTCHINSON SAFETY, JO N 1
Administrative Office
John M. Houlahan, Director
410 Fifth Street SW
L O. Box 327
Ilmar, Minnesota 56201 -0327
Phone: (320) 235 -6106
Fax: (320) 235 -6106
PIONEERI A LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD MEETING
June 19, 1997
P ik ee�and
nnnu�i i�mi�ii
wilmarpl@myal.cfa.org
The Pioneeriand Lbrary system regular Board meeting was held on Tbarsday, June 19, 1997 at the
Kandiyohi County Health & Human Services Building in Willmar, MN. Secretary Evey Vonderharr called
the meeting to order at 7:00 and conducted the meeting until President Orville Rudoingen strived Roll
call was taken with 22 present, 7 excused, 13 absent, and 3 positions sell vacant. Quorum of
representatives from 13 governing units was present.
Following items were added to agenda: N. Committee Reports A4. Ink Net; VL New Business, C.
Facilities Committee
MSP Sanders/Sneer for approval of the financial reports for March, Aped, May 1997. Sanders
explained major atuuments in income and expenditures in the revised 1997 budget. MSP
Sanders/Canfield for approval of the revised 1997 budget. The 1998 budget was discussed extensively.
The proposed amount would put some counties above the 2% levy the state says we can do. Letter will be
sent out along with the ani mation request MSP Sanders/Clouse for approval of the 1998 budget.
Director Hon s an explained the Ink Net bill. MSP Sanders/McDonald we pay tee Inc Net bill
Assistant Director Matson summarized the FY 1998 Regional Li nary Basic system Support grant
program (state funds) and the Fy 1998 Iabrary Services and Technology Act grant application (Federal
fmxds). MSP Madsen/Clouse we approve the signing of these 2 grant applicatiam
Houlihan explained the upcoming needs of the Facilities Committee in negotiating with the city of
Willmar for space for Pioneerland headquarters in the new Willmar library. MSP Sanders/McDonald
give the committee the power to negotiate with the city of Willmar for lease agreement in the new
library. MSP Fieegel/Madsen amended to bring agreement to a special fall BUM meeting in July
before final decision is made.
Houlahan summariz the results and bearing the passed legislation will have on our libraries. The
Federal Ad implements universal service fining for schools and hbrades. MSP Kofthdcl /Sanders the
PIS Board delegate the Automation Committee to apply for FCC grant and approval of the plan
Vonderharr gave the Personnel Committee report. Health insurance: will incimse to 578.74 per month for
single coverage an $183.26 per month for family coverage. This is a 9% increase in our rates MSP
Vouderharr /Canfield we approve the health care contract effective July 1, 1997 to Jame 30, 1998. It
was requested that the contract be pat out on bids next year.
HALL OF FAME applications will be taken until the end of July. Matson summarized the fuV staff
inservice.
Matson and Houlihan were asked to leave the room while 1998 asiaries for the 4 top positions were
discussed. Vonderharr reminded the board that these 4 salaries come only from state and federal flans.
• No city or county t3mds go for these 4 salaries. The 1997 salary survey of West North Central grates was
used as a guide for an average salary. The Personnel Committee recommended $65 ,072 for Director. MSP
VeaderharriSaeden the PIS Board.approvea the nxeuonendatiao of 563.072 salary for Dh ter
• Plan payment of accrued coo4mmuttory dime. HouWhan had submitted his recommendation for the
salaries of the 3 top positions to the Personnel Commutes. MSp Vwderharr/Cadidd the PIS Board
approves these 1998 Worm= S48,M for Anbtiu t Direeeor, 536,218 for Pteayalq Center
Coordinator and 536,248 for Aftoundom Coordinator phas payment of accrued conpeazatory time.
The Personnel Committee is wodang on developing combacts for these 4 tap posbonL MSP Ladd/Jaii
that it go on record the PIS Board commends Kathy Matme, Askant Director, Jean Clark,
Proceamg Center Coordinator, and Beth Luan, Automation Coordinator, for their dedication mod
outstanding job performance. They, along with the Director provide PLS with a distinguished leadership
team
It was recommended that an ad hoc connowee be formed to we haw we can work doses with the krona
and communities as we move two the automation age. Members are to come with ideas to the July
Anne
July 1997 Special PIS board mewing
July 17 Finance Committee meeting, 6:30, PLS office
August 7 Personnel Committee mewing, 5:00, PIS office
August 21 Finance Committee mewing, 6:30, PLS office
September 18 Finance Committee meeting, 6:30, HHS Building, WMnw
September 18 PLS board meeting, 7:30, HHS Building, WiDmar
MSP Sanders/Canfield we adjourn at 9:03 p m.
Ivey Vonderhaa
• 9
•
• HUTCHINSON
fu
REVENUE,
PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM
REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT
JUNE 30, 1987
M -T -D Y -T -D % OF % OF
AMOUNT AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET YEAR
RESERVE
54 ,808.37
54,808.37
46,803.00
117.10%
50%
CITY OPERATING
0.00
38,670.50
77,341.00
50.00%
50%
COUNTY OPERATING
22, 235.00
22,235.00
44,470.00
50.00%
50%
GIFTS
200.00
1,046.56
600.00
174.43%
50%
CHARGES, FINES
54.80
339.78
350.00
97.08%
50%
EQUIPMENT RENTALS
0.00
11.00
25.00
0.00%
50%
BOOK SALES
0.00
0.00
1,500.00
0.00%
50%
OTHER
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00%
50%
TOTAL REVENUES 77,298.17 117,111.21 171,089.00 68.45% 50%
EXPENDITURES:
SALARIES
-6, 511.81
-08,781.28
-83,0D0.00
46.72%
50%
HEALTH INSURANCE
-82.74
-463.94
- 1,084.00
42.80%
50%
HEALTH INSURANCE- DEDUCTIBLE
- 320.00
- 320.00
- 320.00
100.00%
50%
PAYROLLTAXES
- 707.57
- 4,202.39
- 9,130.00
46.03%
50%
BOOKS
- 826.73
- 10,561.46
- 29,000.00
36.42%
50%
PERIODICALS
-67.50
- 2,670.80
- 5,000.00
53.42%
50%
VIDEOS
0.00
350.00
350.00
100.00%
50%
BINDINGS
0.00
0.00
- 100.00
46.72%
50%
POSTAGE & SHIPPING
-72.00
- 454.35
- 1,000.00
45.44%
50%
NEW EQUIPMENT
0.00
- 2,710.43
- 12,000.00
22.59%
50%
MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS
0.00
0.00
- 500.00
0.00%
50%
SUPPLIES
-13.70
-072.41
3,000.00
22.41%
50%
PROMOTIONAL & PROGRAMS
0.00
0.00
- 200.00
0.00%
5D%
INSURANCE
0.00
- 1,134.46
- 1,157.00
98.05%
50%
ADS & LEGAL NOTICES
0.00
0.00
- 100.00
0.00%
50%
AUDITING
0.00
-70.97
-64.00
110.89%
50%
BOOKKEEPING
-30.00
- 180.00
- 360.00
50.00%
50%
CONTINUING EDUCATION
0.00
0.00
365.00
0.00%
50%
SALES TAX
-0.06
-0.06
- 200.00
0.03%
50%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
- 8,632.11
- 82,572.55
- 146,930.00
42.59%
50%
FUNDS AVAILABLE
88,666.06
54,538.66
24,159.00
- 225.75%
50%
NUNNESOTA Department of Revenue
Property Tax Division Mail Station 3340 St. Paul. MN 55146 -3340
Phone (612) 296 -5141 Fax (612) 297 -2166
• JULY 30, 1997
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
TO: CITIES
AUG i - 1997
RE: NOTICE OF 1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID C!7. OF HUTCH11\!1Q0N
The amount of your city's 1998 local performance aid (LPA) has been determined and is
shown on the enclosed notice. The notice also lists the factors used to determine your
city's 1998 local performance aid. Following is an explanation of these factors.
1. 1996 P0Piii,ATI4N- This is yo,Lir city'-- Ap t 1996 p estimate as
determined by the State Demographer for cities outside of the seven -county metropolitan
area or by the Metropolitan Council for cities within the seven - county metropolitan area.
2. ELIGIBLE POPULATION: If your city responded positively to questions 1 and 2
on the Certification of Local Performance Measures for Local Performance Aid Payable
in 1998 (Form LPA -CI REVISED), this is your city's total April 1, 1996 population
estimate. For all other cities, this amount is zero.
3. TOTAL LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID PER CAPITA: This is the result of
• dividing the total amount of LPA available for cities (1997 LPA adjusted for inflation,
$4,210,365, plus the additional appropriation amount of $440,000) by the total eligible
population for all cities, 3,717,497.
4. TOTAL 1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID: This is your city's total 1998 LPA,
determined by multiplying your city's eligible population (line 2) by the total LPA per
capita (line 3).
Your city's 1998 local performance aid will be paid in two equal installments. The first
half installment will be paid on or before July 20, 1998, and the second half installment
will be paid on or before December 26, 1998.
If yorl have anv questions regarding this letter, please call me at (612) 296 -5141. ,
Sincerely,
Larry L.tewley
Research Analysis Specia iist
Enclosure
An equal opporrunity employer TDD.: (612) 215 -0069
MIIVN ATESO
•
•
•
Department of Revenue
Property Tax Division
1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID NOTICE
HUTCHINSON CITY OF
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY HALL
111 HASSAN ST SE
HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, MN 55146 -3340
Phone(612)296 -5141 Fax(612)297 -2166
THE 1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID FOR YOUR CITY IS:
JULY 30, 1997
$ 16,683
THE FOLLOWING IS A LISTING OF THE FACTORS USED IN THE CALCULATION
OF YOUR CITY'S 1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID. SEE THE ENCLOSED
LETTER FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE FACTORS AND FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF YOUR CITY'S LOCAL
PERFORMANCE AID.
1. 1996 POPULATION:
2. ELIGIBLE POPULATION:
3. TOTAL LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID PER CAPITA:
4. TOTAL 1998 LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID (20):
An equal opporlunity employer
12,587
12,587
$ 1.32543591
$ 16,683
TDD: (612) 215 -0069
C
Final Certified Change
1997 LGA 1998 LGA 1997 -1998
ensack
13,8611
13,843
18
Hadley
3,892
4,069'
177 i
Halb&
291,313
301,288
9,975'
Halma
1 8,457
6,616
3591
Halsted
99,494
103,195 1
3,701
Ham Lake
173 400
179,982
6,582'
Hamburg
35,931
36,7971
866'
Hammond
11,327
11,994
292,036,
Hamp ton
15,996
16,130
134
Harxock
108,877
113,098
.4,221
Hanley Fells
52,510
53,362
j 852
Hanover
22,911
25,7301
2,819
Henske
68,9311
71,247
2,316
Hardin
1 014
896
118
Hardwick
1 31,074
32,1391
1,065'
Harmony
Harris
238,270
34,538
242,587
38,498
4 ,317
3,960
Hartland
48,235
48,789
554'
Hastings
1,308,a46
1,331,853
23,007]
Hatfield
1208
1,446
238'
HaWe
185,217
195,484
10,267'
Hayfield
Hayward
190,632
1 38,121
196,889
' 36,8
1 6, 251; ;
1 735
Hazel Run
9,094
9,4 14
3201
Hector
213,7591
220,028'
6,2691
Heidelberg
1,0451
1,227
182'
Henderson
156,199
160,069
i 3,870
Hendricks
136,557
139,609
3,052'.
Hendrum
43 711
45,029'
1,318
Hbnnln
Bette
n
144,640
1,764
124 795
147 876'
2,014
127,652
3,236
250
2,857
Hennantown
1 486,314
480,135
6,179
Heron Lake
i 144,256
148,273
4,017'
Hewitt
i 31,782
32,708
926
Hibbing
4,235,169
4,316,433
81,264
Hill City
50.794
52,239
1,445
Hillman
1,760
1,7821
22
Hills
96,783
98,846
2,065
FWRo
59,261
60,965
1704
Hinckley
133,576
136,1061
2,5281
Hltterdal
42,719
43,1071
388 1
Hoffman l 84.9181
Hokah 150,091
HNdingford 4 114,107]
Holland 36,856
87,1981
153,4681
115,822
37,5331
2,2801
3,3771
1,7151
677',
( Howard Lake_
Hoyt _Lakes
Hugo
Humboldt
-j Hutchinson
Ihlen
Independence
Intl Fells
Inver Grove Heights
na
Junction _
1 6 ton
i Isanfi
- P4 --
1 14,5541
8,103
834,1951,
191,6921
175,014]
268,152
28,679
6,583
1 1,407,5381
13,379
0
2,243,163
474,9061
33,413
4,1671,
105,699
243,3461
Jb, tbJ
14,642!
8,252
827,4641
198,812
274,217'
28,4781
6,9571
1,444,0321
13,7571
'
2,274,34
464,130
34,392
4,438
108,827,
253,966
Jb9
288
149
(6,731)
7,120 j
8,402
6.065
(201
374;
36,494 F
378
0
31,186
(10,776)
979,
271
3.128
10.-12r
Final Certified Change
City 1997L A 1998 LGA 1 1997.19981
Isle
67,434
69,107
1673
Nanlwe
140 800
144,168
3,368
'Jackson
896,528
916,377
19 849
'Janesville
280,504
295 538
15 032
Ja er
119,316
122,863
3 547
.Jeffers
77130
78,903
1773
Jenkins
11,780
12,070
290
Johnson
2 980
3,122
142
.Jordan
292,036,
302,529
10,493
'
45,748
47,497
1,749
Kanstad
137
141,196
3776
Kasola
61,496
_
65,185
3,689
Kasson
438,568
455,494
16
,Keewatin
384,113
391,549
7436
Kelliher
27
29
1,506
'Kellogg
45,470
46,602
1132
IKenne
39,5491
40,916
1,369
Kenneth
10,795
11,078
1 283
Kensington
37,847
38,918
1,071
, Kent
16
16,332
291
'Ken on
226,191
235
9,339
Kerkhovan
121
125,024
3,449
Kerrick
3,310
3,412
102
•Kettle River
27805
26,166
361
Kiester
128,417
130,965
2,548
-- ,Kilkenn
27,639
28,392
753
'Kimball
Kinbrae
47,586
9891
49,998
992
2,412
3
n ton
2
3,436
522
Kin ne
74
75,702
1,063
Lacrescent
297,779
302,636
4,859
Lafayette
84,104
86,346
2,242
Lake Benton
185,290
189,018
3,728
Lake Bronson
50
51,332
794
Lake Ity
740,096
756,104
16,D08
Lake Crystal
286
300,818
14
Lake Elmo
4,494
4,488
6
Lake Henry
4,3771
4,538
161
'.Lake Lillian
45,061
45,920
859
Lake Park
108 442
109,780
3 338
Lake Saint Croix Beach
19,865
21,769
1,904
Lake Shore
0
0
0
ILake Wilson
lakefield
( Lakeland
Lakeland Shores
Lakeville
I,Lamberlon
Lancaster
]Landfall
'Lanesboro
Lapone
1Lapraine
, ,Lasalle
Lastrup _
(Lauderdale
�Lecenter
ILengby
',Leonard
Leonidas
,Leroy
Lester Prairie
!Lesueur
Lewiston
51,677
480,054
20,716
0
485,409
179,320
1 59,796
5,170
195,306
} 6,205
38,401
I 6,930
4,304
53,494
298,723
22,007
1,882
43,971
118,3381
1 147,497!
634,761
125,2851
52,313
491,514
27,173
0
477,449
184,146
61,3501
0
198,962
6,561
38,396
7,522
4,614
54,689
311,784
22,407
2,019
44,229)
122,5401
153,050
- 648,3471
133,178
_ 436
11,460
_ 6,457
0
_ (7,980
4,626
1,554
15,170
3,656
356
5
_ _ 592
_ __ 310
_ 1,195
_ 13,061
40
137
258
4,202
� 5,553
13,566
7,8931
LMC Cities Bulletin
•
7/23/97
HUICFIINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION PAGE 1
STATEMENT OF INCO6 EXPENSES
JUNE 30, 1997
PREVIOUS CURRENT BUDGETED BUDGET
YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE DEVIATION
INCOME STATEMENT
OPERA REVENUE
SALES — ELECTRIC ENERGY
SALES FOR RESALE
NET INCOME FROM OT HER SOURC
SECURITY LIGHTS
POLE RENTAL
SALE — GAS
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE — - - - - -—
5,543,171.62
230,338.00
22,5
6,474.50
1,657.25
3,267,280.10
9,07!,46!.19
•
ANNUAL
BUDGET —
3,547,315.18
5,642,900.00
(95,584.82)
Y1,300,000.00
393,043.50
393,300.00
(256.50)
570,000.00
45, !10.52__—
21,38
_ 23,356.52
_ _._;,41 000.40 -__
6,354.50
6,500.00
(145.50)
13,000.00
1,640.25
2,160.00
(519.75)
4,000.00
4 058,_899_39,
3 ,320.9000
968,856.90
10,052,363.34
9,395,514.00
656,849.34
17,941,000.00
OPERATING EXPENSES _
_
k
PRODUCTION OPERATION
527,868.10
521,220.03
584,802.15
63,582.12
1,155,395.00
61,258.49
PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
406,956.56
330,007.52
348,090.00
18,082.48
486,100.00
(1,558.20)
RCH ASED POWER_
1,575
968,856.90
96
(6,216,90)
1,719,000
L.
_ K
TRANSMISSION OPERATION
.00
_
.00
.00
.00
3,400.00
"I
TRANSMISSION MAINTENANCE
14,454.40
12,281.82
13,250.00
968.18
84,000.00
L N
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUT OPERATION
1 03 650.41
133,284.81
125,798,50
(7,486,31)
.9
�e
_
ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE
109,898.12
_
114,570.08
104,935.00
(9,635.08)
170,100.00
MFG GAS PRODUCTION OPERATION
MFG GAS PRODUCTION MAINTENANCE
627.04
38.50
881.22
573.
440.00
1!0.00
(441.22)
(463.72)
1
— — 2,000.Q4
_
PURCHASED GAS EXPENSE
4,250,335.30
5,148,4!3.19
4,319,895.00
(828,518.19)
8,360,790.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION OPERATION
106,668.79
111,556.63
118,630.00
7,073.37
244,120.00
GAS DISTRIBUTION MA
30,810.70
33,363.19
34, 951, QQ
1,587,8
- _54,44000
CUSTOMER ACCIXFIT ING 8 COLLECTIONS
100,652.12
118,129.69
___
110,809.00
(7,320.69)
220,800.00
t
ADMINISTRATIVE 6 GENERAL EXPENSES
636,870.21
923,026.49
784,688.66
(138,337.83)
1,425,116.20
DEPRE
726,210.00
729,360
770.600.00
49,240.00
_1,562,QQQ,QQ
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
8,590,327.62
9,145,525.29
8,287,639.31
(857,885.98)
15,698,171.20
OPERATING INCOME
_ 481, 133.57
906,838,05
l .lQZ, @74 69
(2O IQ36164)
___ 2,242.828
OTHER INCOME
OTHER - NET
27,978.84
_ 79,762.29
27,050.00
52 ,712 .29
_0 ,000.00
d
INTEREST INCOME
98,979.09
135,913.92
96,600.00
39,313.92
210,000.00
MISC INCOME
75,688.79
83,251.08
55,800.00
27,45!.08
60,000.00
GAIN ON D ISPOSAL
.00
.00
.
.00 —
_._._
MISC INCOME - GAS
142,196.22
230,276.04
127,530.00
102,746.04
` 1,500.OQ
327,000.00
-
TOTAL OTHER INCOME
344,842.94
529,203.33
306,980.00
222,223.33
688,500.00
r
OTHER EXPENSES
_
DEPLETION - GAS WELLS
.00
.00
.00
.00
MISC EXPENSES
40,619.05
61,258.49
31,297.00
(29 ,961.49)
INTEREST EXPENSE
322,188.66
301,434.20
299,876.00
(1,558.20)
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSES
363,007.71
362,692.69
331,173.00
(31,519.69)
CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
337,500.00
337,915.00
337,500.00
(415.00)
TOTAL CONTRIBUTION TO CITY
337,500.00
337,915.00
337,500.00
(415.00)
105,000.00
599,400.00
775,700.00
675,000.00
675,000.0.0
NON- OPERATING'INCOME (355,664.77) (171,404.36) (361,693.00) 190,288.64 (762,200.00)
NET INCOME 12 _ 735,433.69 746,!81.69_____ (10,748.00) 1,480 ,28.80
7/23/97 HUTL,NINSUN UTILITIES COMMISSION
• BALANCE
JUNE 30, 997
f
MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIABILITIES —1
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
MUNICIPAL EQUITY
IINARPkfIF•RTATFD RFTATNf - FARNTNr..S
PAGE 2
•
_� ■ +t • ■ TOTAL ■ w • r
29,722,477.20 --
735.433.69 r--
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY
30,457,910.89 -
LONG TERM LIABILITIES –NET OF
—
CURRENT MATURITIES
1993 BONDS
12,250,000.00
TOTAL LONG TERM LIABILITIES
I
12,25
000.00
CONSTR CONTRACTS 8 ACCTS PAY RETAIN
ACCRUED EX PENSES – RE
TOTAL CONSTkUCTION 8 ACCTS PAY
2,976.1
CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
-
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE - -
- _ -- i,248,859.73
"1
INTEREST ACCRUED
52,060.78
z�
ACCRUED PAYROLL
50.653.16
ACCRUED VACATION PAYABLE
-
_
152,755.52
"I
ACCRUED MEDICAL FUND
106,e55.eB
ACCRUED REC PAYMENT
_ 3,393.60
CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
91,700.00
y
OTHER CURRENT 6 ACCRUED LIABILITIES
(1,100.61)
TOTAL CURREN 6 ACCRUED LIAB
1,705,178.06
_.._
TOTAL MUNICIPAL EQUITY 6 LIAR
1
44,416,065.07
i
l
ar
- - --j
7/23/97 HUTCHINSON UTI:L.ITIES COMhISSION
• BALANCE T
JUNE 30, 997
_ASSE _
-- UTILITY PLANT - AT COST
LAND d LAND RIGHTS
DEPRECIABLE UTILITY PLANT
PAGE I
■ r r r TOTAL M x•*
S91, 734.75
53.019.070.13
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT
53,vi0,n0a.ed
LESS A CCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(19,
TOTAL ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
(19,724,294.23)
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
32 _
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS
i
327,285.65
a�
TOTAL UTILITY PLANT DEPREC VALUE
-
34,51
_ -
s
RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
INVESTMENT - GAS RESERVES
675,454.69
_ _
MEDICAL INSURANCE
108,800.00
BOND & INTEREST PAYMENT 1993
706,074.75
BOND RESERVE 1993
1,389
-
_
CATASTROPHIC FAILURE FUND
1,250,000.00
TOTAL RESTRICTED FUNDS 6 ACCOUNTS
4,120,849.44
x
CURRENT 8 ACCRUED ASSETS
N
CASH IN BANK
2,677,307.49
]5
INVESTMENTS A SAVINGS ACCOUNTS
_.
70,332
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1,902,396.00
INVENTORIES
914,715.25
A
PREPAID INSURANCE
70 937
ACCRUED INTEREST RECEIVABLE
2,811.12
MISC - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
1,149.83
TOTAL CURREN 6 ACCRUED ASSETS
5,639,650.26
DEFERRED CHARGE
-
BOND D 1993
141 769.07
_
_ _
TOTAL DEFERRED CHARGE
141,769.07
TOT ASSETS
_ 44,416,065.07
r.
61
•
•
0:33 AM
Final
(A) (B) (A) -(B)
JUNE MAY JUNE Charge
1997 1997 1996 CY vs PY
$520,598 $387,238 $557,466 ($36.869)
1.330.048 1,360,224 730.432 599,616
1,095,261 1,054,481 908,705 188,557
394,556
457,578
272,075
122,481
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
938,659
738,824
191,084
334,312
Comparative
Balance Sheet
(1,987)
556,751
567,620
683,929
As of June 30, 1997
64,123
67,584
64,248
(A)
51,230
(B)
(A) - (B)
(204,770)
3,676
8,965
JUNE
MAY
JUNE
Charge
1997
1997
1996
CY vs PY
ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
1
Cash and investments - Operations
$2,510,207
$2,439,616
$3,132,066
(621,859)
Current maturities of
2
Cash and investments - Self- Insured
1,077,642
1,095,342
1,158,844
(81,202)
Long term debt
3
Subtotal cash 6 Investments
$3,587,850
$3,534,958
$4,290,910
(703,061)
Accounts payable - trade
Estimated contractual
4
Patient/Resldenl receivables
6,604,576
6,428,702
6,131,984
672,592
settlements -net
5
Allowances for bad debts
(1,103,338)
(1,057,805)
(864,632)
(238,706)
Accrued expenses -
6
Advances and contractual albwances
(1,957,273)
(1,670,982)
(1,570,428)
(386,844)
Salaries
7
Net patienUresident and third -party
PTO
8
payor receivables
$3,743,966
$3,699,915
$3,696,925
$47,041
Interest
9
Se8- Insured program
fe
10
Other receivables - net
7,177
9,222
110,613
(103,436)
MN Care tax payable
11
Inventories
426,827
455,299
507,020
(80,192)
Deterred liabilities
12
Prepaid expenses
94,376
139,911
50,236
44,140
Deferred revenue
13
Total Current Assets
$7,860,196
$7,839,304
$8,655,703
($795,507)
Total Current Liabilities
14
Board DesionatedlFunded Depredation Investmems
$6,109,085
$6,074,423
$4,710,961
$1,398,125
15
Investment in Joint Ventures
$108,884
$108,984
$50,DD0
$58,984
Plant Assets
16
Land
$165,896
3165,686
$165,696
$0
17
Buildings
18,104,719
17,965,315
17,713,656
391,063
18
Accumulated depredation
(6,625,612)
(6,567,267)
(5,947,400)
(678,213)
Lora -term Debt (less current
19
Buildings less depreciation
$11,479,107
$11,398,048
$11,766,256
($287,150)
mehinties)
20
Equipment
9,753,098
9,726,503
8,894,124
858,973
21
Accumulated depredation
(6,820,029)
(6,755,019)
(6,091,666)
(728,364)
22
Equipment less depredation
$2,933,068
$2,971,484
$2,802,459
$130,610
23
Cash - construction 8 equipment
0
0
0
0
24
Construction in progress
326,236
402,345
162,173
161,063
25
Total Plant Assets
$14,904,108
$14,937,573
$14,896,585
$7,523
Fund balance
Other Assets
26
Deferred financing costs
$234,280
$236,026
$261,974
($27,694)
27
Total Funds,
$29,216,652
$ 29,196, 309
$
$
Total Funds
0:33 AM
Final
(A) (B) (A) -(B)
JUNE MAY JUNE Charge
1997 1997 1996 CY vs PY
$520,598 $387,238 $557,466 ($36.869)
1.330.048 1,360,224 730.432 599,616
1,095,261 1,054,481 908,705 188,557
394,556
457,578
272,075
122,481
929,908
938,659
738,824
191,084
334,312
259,047
336,298
(1,987)
556,751
567,620
683,929
(127,179)
64,123
67,584
64,248
(125)
51,230
51,230
256,000
(204,770)
3,676
8,965
(9,253)
12,930
$5,280,462 $5,152,646 $4,536,724 $743,738
$11,829,067 $11,961,676 $13,457,132 ($1,628,065)
$12,107,123 $12,081,987 $9,019,120 $3,088,003
$29,218,652 $29,196,309 $27,012,976 $2,203,676
Finstmnt
Pam Larson
i
Revenue
1 In patient revenue
2 Ancillary services
3 Total in patient revenue
4 Out patient revenue
5 Resident Revenue
6 Total pabenl/residem revenue
Discounts
7 Governmental 8 Policy Discount
8 Free Care
9 Total deduction from revenue
10 Net patient/resident revenue
11 Other operating revenues
12 Net operating revenue
Expensas
13 Salaries
14 Employee Benefils
15 Professional Fees
16 Medical Fees
17 Utilities, Mt nca Contracts & Rbpalrs
18 Food. Dugs 8 Supplies
19 Olhar expense
20 Minnesota Care
21 Bad debt
22 Interest
23 Depredation
24 Total expenses
Excess of net operating revenue
25 over (urder) operating expenses
Nonotwatm Revenues
26 Investment ncorne
27 Other nonoparating revenue (net)
28 Total nonopersting revenue
29 Net Income
HUTCHINSON 9 HEALTH CARE
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Month and Period Ended June 30, 1997
30
CURRENT MONTH
717
665
YEAR -TO -DATE
7.8%
YEAR -TO -DATE
4,510
98
Over (Under)
Budget
0.3%
31
Over (Ur6m) Budget
3,559
3,657
VARIANCE %
Actual
Budget
Dollars
Percent
Actual
Budget
Dollars
Percent
Jun -96
1997 vs 1996
$510,421
$525,383
(314,962)
-2.8%
$3,228,070
$3,443133
(5215,063)
-62%
$2,997,831
7.7%
841,917
823,567
18,351
22%
4,888,218
5,308,725
(420,508)
-7.9%
4,477,016
92%
$1.352,339
$1,348,950
$3.389
0.3%
$8,116,288
$8,751,858
($635,571)
-7.3%
$7,474,847
8.6%
1,741,837
1,562,775
179,061
11.5%
10,118,079
9,856,486
261,593
2.7%
8,579,848
17.9%
356,694
383,485
(26,791)
.7.0%
2,269,173
2,313,041
(43,868)
.1.9%
2,222,317
21%
$3,450,869
$3,295,210
$155,659
4.7%
$20,503,540
$20,921,385
($417,845)
-2.0%
$18,277,012
12.2%
1,332,889
1,130,319
202,570
17.9%
7.210,731
7,220,407
(9,675)
-0.1%
5,711,562
26,2%
0
8,333
(8,333)
- 100,0%
4,805
50,000
(45,195)
-90.4%
7,132
.32,6%
$1,332,889
$1,138,653
$194,236
17.1%
$7,215,537
$7,270,407
($54,870)
-90.5%
$5,718,694
26.2%
$2.117,980
$2,156,558
($38,578)
.1.8%
$13,288,004
513.650,979
($362,975)
-2.7%
512,558,318
5.8%
22,877
13,992
8,886
63.5%
81,030
83,950
(2,920)
-3.5%
82,177
-1.4%
$2,140,857
$2,170,549
($29,692)
-1.4%
$13,369,033
$13,734,929
($365,895)
-2.7%
$12,640,495
5.8%
49.5 ,
55.0
-5.5
- 10.0%
$1025,338
$1,006,850
$18489
1.8%
$6,114,892
$6,239,331
($124,439)
-2.0%
$5,636,627
84%
213,882
210,672
3,210
1.5%
1,281,277
1,304,188
(22,911)
-1.8%
1,208,295
60%
97,589
107,032
(9,443)
-8.8%
695,527
721,173
(25,646)
-3.6%
588,713
18.1%
128,260
139,648
(11,588)
-8.3%
855,846
641,152
14,695
1.7%
671,378
27.5%
102,241
131,096
(28,855)
-22.0%
633,049
699,096
(66,047)
-9.4%
542,630
16.7%
313,650
290,294
23,356
8.0%
1,792,589
1,823,209
- (30,621)
-1.7%
1,621,065
10.6%
61,778
83,792
(22,014)
-26.3%
463,817
514,757
(50,940)
-9-9%
422,276
9.8%
20,235
23,083
(2,648)
-12.3%
127.106
138,498
(11,392)
-8.2%
108,818
16.8%
38,362
33,739
4,623
13.7%
184,188
213,813
(29,625)
-139%
195,597
-5.8%
54,111
61,275
(7,165)
-11.7%
396,147
373,021
23,126
6.2%
357,136
2.3%
113,027
114,021
(994)
-01%
661,261
659.923
1,338
0.2%
668,570
-1.1%
$2,168,474
$2,201,702
(533,228)
-1,5%
$13,205,699
$13,528,161
($322,462)
.24%
$12.053,105
9.6%
($27,617)
($31,153)
$3,536
-11.3%
$163,335
$206,768
(543,433)
-21.0%
$587,390
-72.2%
$58,567
$37,463
$21,104
56.3%
$251,827
$224,778
$27,048
12.0%
$128,805
95.5%
(5,814)
(3,499)
(2,315)
66.2%
(15,785)
(21,563)
5,777
-26.8%
(54,860)
-71.2%
$52,753
$33,964
$18,789
55.3%
$236,041
$203,216
$32,825
16.2%
$73,945
219.2%
$25,136
$2,811
$ 22, 324
794.1%
$3 99,376
$ 409,983
(
-2.6%
$861,335
-39 .6%
30
Pahentdays
717
665
52
7.8%
4,608
4,510
98
2.2%
4,595
0.3%
31
Resdent days
3,559
3,657
(98)
-2.7%
22,049
22.068
(19)
-0.1%
22.328
-1.2%
32
Out patient services
3,819
3,829
-10
-0.3%
25,079
23,411
1,668
7.1%
22,186
13.0%
33
Percent occupancy - budget beds - Hospital
39.8%
36.9%
2.9%
7.9%
42.4%
41,5%
0.9%
2.2%
42.1%
0.7%
34
Percent occupancy -bud tat bads - Nursing Horne
93.4%
96.0%
-2.6%
-2.7%
95.9%
96.0%
-0.1%
-0.1%
97.0%
-1.1%
35
FTE's
387.4
379.4
8.0
2.1%
381.2
3794,
1,8
0.5%
360.5
5.7%
36
Adm ssions (aclit d) - Hospital only
438
403
34
8.5%
2,764
2,596
168
6.5 %
2,583
7.0%
37
Expenses (net) Der admission (adjualed) - Hospital only
3.937
4,292
(355)
-8.3%
3.754
4,122
(368)
-8.9%
3,627
3.5%
38
Revenue par admmalon(lydpmted) - Hospital only
6,935
7.063
(127)
-1,8%
6,467
7,024
(557)
-7.9%
6,082
8.3%
39
Not Revenue per admission (adRalad) - Hospital only
3,918
4,301
(383)
-8,9%
3,904
4,280
(378)
-8.5%
3,917
-0.3%
40
Discounts as a penxn of revenues
38,6%
34.6%
41A%
11.6%
35.2%
34.8%
0.4%
1.3%
31.3%
12.5%
41
FTE's par 100 adnussions (ed)usted) - Hospital any
5.0
5.4
-0.3
-6.3%
4.6
5.0
-0.3
-6.7%
4.7
-1.7%
42
Days in Net Accounts Receivable
49.5 ,
55.0
-5.5
- 10.0%
50.5
-2.0%
43
Case Mix - Horne only
2.44
140
0.04
1.7%
2.44
2.40
0.04
1.7%
2.35
3.8%
Fnstmnt