cp07-27-1999 c0 6 0
JULY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
1999
-25-
-26-
-27-
HUTCHINSON
7:00 a m. — Leadership Team Mtg.
CITY
in Main Conf. Room
CALENDAR
Noon — Hutchinson Safety Council
Meeting at Heritage Center
9:00 a.m. — Management Team
Mtg. in Main Conf. Room
WEEK OF .
5:30 p.m. — Airport Commission at
Civil Air Patrol Building
5:30 p.m. - City Council Mtg.
Ju4 25-31
in Council Chambers
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
-28-
-29-
-30-
-31-
CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/
TRAININGNACATION
26 -30 Christie Rock (V)
3:00 p.m. — Utilities Commission
2:00 p.m. —Open Bids for Civic
at Utilities Office
Arena Bleachers in City Center
Main Conf. Room
C =Conference
M = Meeting
S = Seminar
T = Training
V = Vacation
. AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, J ULY 27, 1
INVOCATION — Rev. James Hakes, Seventh Day Adventist Church
MIN'UTE„S — REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 13, 1999 AND BID OPENING OF JULY
14, 1999, JULY 16, 1999 AND JULY 23, 1999
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 15, 1999
2. HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OFJUNE 28, 1999
3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF JUNE 28, 1999
4. FINANCIAL REPORT AND CERTIFICATES INVESTMENT REPORT
FOR JUNE 1999
• (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 99 -262 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE,
DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF CERTAIN ASSETS TO RIDGEVIEW
CHANHASSEN CLINIC, A MINNESOTA NON - PROFIT
CORPORATION (SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
2. RESOLUTION NO. 11263 — RESOLUTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW
(c)
❖ MCLEOD COUNTY AG. ASSOCIATION FOR COUNTY FAIR
❖ UNFAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION DUE TO INADEQUATE
STAFFING:
➢ OSCAR MENA FOR ARMORY ON AUGUST 28, 1999
➢ JOSE A. PALACIOS FOR ARMORY ON AUGUST 21, SEPTEMBER 4
AND SEPTEMBER 18, 1999
(d) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR POLICE CHIEF TO ATTEND TRAINING
COURSE IN ARLINGTON, VA
(e) "ON SALE" NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MCLEOD
COUNTY AG. ASSOCIATION FOR BEER GARDEN AT COUNTY FAIR
(I) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
• 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH
CARLSON TO CONSTRUCT POLE TYPE GARAGE AT 426 HURON
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999 i
STREET SE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 11264)
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL
REITER TO CONSTRUCT VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATED IN I/C
DISTRICT AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11265)
3. VACATION OF DEDICATED STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY LOCATED IN
STUCKE'S FIRST ADDITION WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE
AND SET SECOND READING FOR AUGUST 10, 1999)
4. FINAL PLAT KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS FOURTH
ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11266)
Action — Motion to approve consent agenda
i 0 11 Lei :1 X1 5 11 ► LOM&I� '
(a) CONTINUED ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT NO.
99 -03 & 99 -04; CENTURY AVENUE SW AND DALE STREET SW
(CONTINUED FROM JULY 13, 1999) •
Action - Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt
Resolution No. 11268
(b) ASSESSMENT HEARING FOR LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 99 -10,
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5031; TH 15 SOUTH AND DENVER AVENUE SW
Action — Motion to continue assessment hearing to August 24, 1999 — Motion to
reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11269
(c) CABLE FRANCHISE TRANSFER FROM TRIAX TO MEDIACOM
Action — Motion to continue hearing
(d) BOARD OF REVIEW FOR A.W. DISPOSAL SANITATION SERVICES
Action — Motion to close hearing
6. COMMUNICATIONS. R EQUFSTS P .TITTONS
(a) BOND SALE REPORT ON 1999 IMPROVEMENT BONDS BY EHLERS &
ASSOCIATES
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11267
7.
I
— NONE
`a
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999
(a) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO CONTRACT WITH UNIVERSITY OF
MINNESOTA TO COMPILE, ANALYZE AND PRESENT COMMUNITY
NEEDSSURVEY
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve contract
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LETTING NO. 9,
PROTECT NO. 98 -18 (HOSPITAL/MEDICAL CENTER PARKING LOT)
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution
(c) DISCUSSION ON CENTRAL GARAGE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ISSUES
(CITY /COUNTY /STATE/HUTCHINSON UTILITIES)
Action —
(d) CONSIDERATION OF REFUSE CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH A. W.
DISPOSAL, INC.
!. Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION OF MIGHTY DUCKS GRANT AGREEMENT
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve agreement and adopt Resolution No.
11261
(I) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BIOSOLIDS DRYING
FACILITIES EQUIPMENT PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(g) UPDATE FROM PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF CONCERNING
CONSTRUCTION OF GARAGE AT 550 MILLER AVENUE SW
Action -
(h) CONSIDERATION OF LETTING NO. 14, PROJECT NO. 99 -35; WEST HALF
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION (CENTURY 7 CINEMA);
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11270, No.
11271 and No. 11272
3
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JULY 27, 1999 •
(i) CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING CENSUS 2000 PROCLAMATION
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
�u T.r�l� 1111:�►1 �Cili7.�
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS
Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds
�\ laf•111:7►`lu' 1 ICY N
• MINUTES
BID OPENING
JULY 14, 1999
Director Randy DeVries called the bid opening to order at 1:00 p.m. Also present were
Bill Chang of Earth Tech and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson.
The reading of Invitation to Bid, Biosolids Drying Facilities Equipment Procurement and
Installation was dispensed with. The following bid was opened and read:
McCormick Construction Co.
Rockford, MN $1,302,700.00
The bid was referred to City staff for review and a recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 1:05 p.m.
n
W
MINUTES
BID OPENING
JULY 16, 1999
Police Chief Steve Madson called the bid opening to order at 1:00 p.m. Also pr nt was
Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 6037, Notice of Public Sale of Forfeited V le (1998
Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z -34), was dispensed with. The following bids wer shed and
read:
Lynn Gemand
Lynn's Auto Sales
Hutchinson, MN $1 )0.00
Van Karg
Hutchinson, MN $12,651.00
R & R Auto Sales
Madelia, MN $14,500.00
The bids were referred to City staff for review and a recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 1:05 p.m.
W
•
0
•
MINUTES
BID OPENING
JULY 23, 1999
City Administrator Gary D. Plotz called the bid opening to order at 10:00 a.m. Also
present were City Engineer John Rodeberg and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J.
Swanson.
The reading of Publication No. 6036, Advertisement for Bids, Letting No. 9, Project No.
98 -18, was dispensed with. The following bids were opened and read:
Duininck Bros., Inc.
Prinsburg, MN $359,291.00 $ 85,559.00 Dec. 1, 1999
Wm. Mueller & Sons, Inc.
• Hamburg, MN $408,079.42 $ 60,865.22 No Date
Reiner Contracting Inc.
Hutchinson, MN $237,870.25 $ 56,467.49 60 Days
The bids were referred to City staff for review and a recommendation.
The meeting adjourned at 10:05 a.m.
0
N
MINUTES
HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, June 15, 1999
1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dean Wood at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present:
Dave Westlund, Jim Haugen, Jeff Jones, Bill Arndt, Dean Kirchoff, and Chairman Dean Wood. Absent: Jeff
Haag Also present: Julie Wischnack, Director of Planning and Zoning, Bonnie Baumetz, Planning and Zoning;
and Richard Schieffer, City Legal Counsel.
2. a) Consideration of minutes of regular meeting dated May 18, 1999.
Mr. Arndt made a motion to approve the minutes. Seconded by Mr. Haugen the motion carried
unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING REQUEST SUBMITTED BY JUNE REDMAN TO REZONE
PROPERTY FROM C-4 AND R -2 TO I/C LOCATED AT 255 AND 287 HWY 7 EAST
Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 5:34 p.m. with the reading of publication #6021 as published
in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Baumetz explained the property contains three structures: a home /office, a residence, and an
accessory building which is used for the brick and tile company. The property boundaries are oddly
shaped. Amcon Block abuts the north and eastern portions of the property. Staff recommends
approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The zoning district adjoins an industrial area
and uses within the I/C are controlled by conditional use permits. 2. The rezoning will not have a
negative impact on the surrounding properties. 3. The existing use of the property is more than
commercial use.
Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westlund. The hearing closed at 5:39 p.m.
Mr. Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Westlund . The motion carried unanimously.
b) CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ROLLING MEADOWS
AND REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM R -1 TO R -3 SUBMITTED BY BRUCE NAUSTDAL
LOCATED NORTH OF HUSKI ADDITION (TDM AVE.) AND SOUTH OF JOHNSON COURT (GOLF
COURSE RD.
Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 5:39 p.m. with the reading of publication #6022 as published
in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Wischnack explained the existing zoning of the property is R -1. The Comprehensive Plan guides
this area as Medium Density Residential, which allows for zoning of R -3. The property is
approximately 31 acres. The proposed density would be 2.7 units per acre.
The proposed preliminary plat provides for 84 single family lots. The final plat provides for 21 tots. The
lot saes range from 7,200 sq. ft. to 16,00 sq. feet. The R -3 Zoning District provides for a minimum
lot size of 7,200 sq. ft. The minimum lot widths and depths are met by the plan. Outlot A provides a
storm water ponding area. The pond elevations were provided by Barr, although, in discussing this
with the project engineer, the pond will be lowered because of the existing elevations of the homes
to the west. Outlot B is a swale type drainage area that leads to the storm water pond.
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning, preliminary and final plat with the following conditions:
1. The subdividers agreement be finalized and executed.
2. The identified utility easement be expanded.
3. Remove platted right of way on the southeastern portion of the plat.
4. Provide a resolution to the maintenance of Outlot B.
_ Jean Ward explained the affordable housing planned for this area. The lots are sized for single family
housing. The 60 ft. lot widths are needed to keep housing affordable . They are looking for effective
designs for single family with detached garages. They are asking to be rezoned R -3 so the 60 ft. lot
width w ll meet zoning requirements.
Bruce Naustdal, developer. said ( for comparison) the smallest lots in Parkside Additio is
currently c onsbucting homes, are 68 to 80 ft lots. Mr. Neustdal said his intent is to corm ( de
fandty homes.
Mr. LeRoy Hlavke, 925 Luadke Lane said he would like some type of buffer between . no
and R -3 development.
Marty Campion, civil engineer, Otto Associates, said ponding for the project and outside 6 ddng
up a lot area. Smaller lots are needed to make it profitable for the developer. Size of the was
determined by a city consultant from Barr Engineering. This is a regional pond.
Ms. Wischnack said cost of pond will be partially funded by the city — 31%.
Bob Williams, 945 Ludtke Lane, is concerned with water running through his back y,- His Is
concerned the water may back up into his back yard as it flows to the pond. He d n't want
apartment buildings in his back yard.
Ms. Wlschnack said in a R -3 zone the developer wltl have to go through the condition- >_ process
before constructing apartrnent houses.
Marty Campion said provisions with the grading have been made to maintain cur( 3vations for
drainage.
Jeff Borkenhagen, 920Golt Course Rd. asked If an environmental Impact study r -- ueen done.
Mike Van Ort- 920 Luedt ke Lane asked If Is It possible to have mobile homes : a R -3 zone district.
Jean Ward Bald a onvirornrenhl Impart study has been done and then was rro Impact. As part
of federal funding a study Is required. It was published In the newspaper. When Increasing the
sizes of the lots decreases afordability of the homes.
Diane Sorenson, reshot, said they wanted a ndxture of houses and have worked very hard to
dispurse 60' Iota with 70' kNa. The trend Is to smaller lots with a common area. The houses will have
double garages. it will be a mixture of designs of houses with basements. They need 84 units to meet
requirements for funding.
The pond will be a regional pond with a trail around It. Vegetation will be planted in and around lt.
BIN Arndt asked if the trail can be connected to existing trails.
Ms. Wlschnac k said the city park director did look at the development plans. Developer has offered
to put In a trail to make it a nicer neighborhood.
LuAnn Mueller, 711 California St., would like the pond fenced in on her side for safety reasons.
Marty Campion said the maximum depth slopes V verfical in 4-5 horizontal. They are designing a 10'
shelf. The first 10' will be relatively flat. Depth of permanent pool will be 5' after a storm event and
then back to 3'. The pond is placed on the western area because existing water flow drains to this
area.
George Gwerth, 955 Luadke Lane, said he was against R-3 zoning and would like it to remain R -1
Jill Corson, 910 Golf Rd., doesn't want the zoning changed to R -3.
Nathaniel Olson, 771 California SL , asked If the development is going to Increase traffic on California
St., the increased traffic may cause concern for safety.
Amy Anderson, said the potential for apartments in this area Is a concern. She felt apartment
complexes tend to devalue surrounding property.
Bruce Naustdal said he was willing to increase the size of lots on the northern portion of the plat to
meet criteria of the R -2 zoning requirements and make lot area 8400 sq. ft.
Jim Weckman, 761 California St., said he was concerned with R-3 zoning and asked if a covenant
could be attached to the property to protect present property owners. He would like the grade
changed on the pond, and he was also concerned with congestion on California St.
2
Marty Campion said the grades coincide with existing grades along the west property line providing
enough storage area for storms.
Bruce Naustdal said he would agree to include in covenants a statement limiting the lots to single
family dwellings.
Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westuad the hearing dosed at 7:05 p.m. Mr.
Jones made a motion to recommend approval of the consideration for preliminary and final plat with
staff recommendations, the lots north of 8th Ave NW meet the 8400 sq. ft. area requirement, wording
be added to the association agreement limiting construction to single family homes, and ft city staff
address roadway widths and maintenance around the pond. Seconded by Mr. Westund ft motion
carried unanimously.
Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Jones the hearing dosed at 7:05 p.m Mr. Arndt
made a motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning with staff recommendations.
Seconded by Mr. Jones. The motion carved unanimously.
C) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THERMAN ELIOTT, 984
CHURCH STREET TO CONSTRUCT A 8 FOOT FENCE ON A CORNER LOT.
Chairmen Wood opened the hearing at 7:22 p.m with the reading of publication #8024 as published
In The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1999.
Ms. Baumetz explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a conditional use permit to
constrict a 8' fence along the front yard of a comer lot The lot is located on the northwest corner of
Church Street S.W. and South Grade Road. The fence will be placed on South Grade Road. The
property Is very flat toward both streets. The fence is proposed to be located 20 feet from the sidewalk
area. The location has been checked by the City Engineer and will not create a visual problem for
accessing the roadway. Staff recomnwWs approval of the request.
Mr. Jones moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Haugen the hearing dosed at 7:25 p.m. Mr.
Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendation. Seconded
by Mr. Jones. The motion carried unanimously.
d) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY MARK RIEGER TO
CONSTRUCT A 1,104 SO. FT. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO BE LOCATED AT 888 ELM ST S.E.
Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:28 p.m. with the reading of publication #WM as published
in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1999.
Me. Baumelz explained the applicant has met the akerfa of Section 8.07 for issuance of a conditional
use perk. k should be noted that the maximum height of the building is 18 feet There is a storm
sewer catch basin to the north of the proposed garage. The required setback off at the adjoining
property line is 8 feet Staff recommends approval.
Mr. Kadhoff moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Arndt the heanmg dosed at 7:30 p.m. Mr.
Ktchoff made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded
by Mr. Arndt. The motion carried unanimously.
e) CONSIDERATION OF CONDMONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE BUILDING AND A CML AIR PATROL OFFICE
TRAILER LOCATED AT THE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ON HWY 15 SOUTH.
Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:30 p.m. with the readirg of publication #8025 as published
in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 8, 1989.
Ms. Wnachnack said the applicant is requesting a conditional use perk to locate a 24' x 80' office
trailer on airport property, 18713 Hwy. 15 South for use as a meeting and training headquarters. The
City is also required to obtain a conditional use permit to construct an arivaUdeparlure building on the
property.
Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Jones the hearing dosed at 7:35 p.m. Mr.
Haugen made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded
by Mr. Westund. The motion carried unanimously.
CONSIDERATION OFAMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PL, 4RDING THE
INFRASTRUCTURE STAGING PLAN.
Chairman Wood opened the hearing at 7:36 p.m. with the reading of publicaw as published
in The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Wischnack said staff is requesting allowance to amend the Comprehensw- !o un:'.,,a the
infrastructure staging plan (map). The map will indicate the direction of infras,. devC ument
and update the expected year of priority to service the city.
Mr. Arndt moved to dose the hearing, seconded by Mr. Westiund the hearing c1mv -i ,t 7:38 p.m. Mr.
Arndt made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recomme +, , :ens. Seconded
by Mr. Westlund. The motion carried unanimously.
4.
NEW BUSINESS
a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS HUNTER'S RIDGF :OND ADDITION- -_
SUBMITTED BY DENNIS KAHL
The final plat for the second addition consists of 6 lots. The tit configuration fanged slightly, but
has removed one lot. Staff recommends approval with the following con&
1. Execute Subdivider's Agreement
2. If the preliminary plat will not be followed in future platting, a n' plat must be
submitted.
3. Final grading and utility plan approval.
Mr. Westiund made a motion to approve the request with staff recommended conditions. Seconded
by Mr. Arndt. The motion carried unanimously.
5.
1-31
Discussion regarding changing the format of the minutes.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
9
4
+HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION
11
June 28, 1999
5 3 p.m.
Airport Lobby
MINUTES
Members present: Steve Crow, Joe Dooley, Robert Hantge, and Dave Skaar,
Members absent: Jim Faber
Others present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Bernie Knutson, HCDC;
Tom Parker, Airport F.B.O.;
John Olson, Asst Pub Wks Dir.
There was a quorum of members present.
OLD BUSINESS
A discussion was held regarding the update meeting held with representatives of the City,
TKDA, and contractors. The members were informed that progress was being made at near
expected pace, with some slight delays caused by wet weather. Mike Wassman is TKDA's
representative on -site. Members were encouraged to direct questions to Wassman or John
Olson.
Members discussed the fueling system. At this time, the commission recommended moving the
fueling system "as is ". Any plans for a new reel system will be deferred to a future date.
Members of the Civil Air Patrol informed the commission about the status of the double -wide
commercial building that they will be moving onto airport property in conjunction with Phase II
improvements. Member discussed the location of utilities to the building, particularly water and
sewer.
Members also discussed the location of the FBO's mobile home. Of concern were the locations
of utilities, particularly water and sewer, and the home's orientation with the runway /taxiway.
Members suggested that airport signs be erected on TH 15, Co. Rd. 8, and T.H. 22 to direct
traffic to the airport.
Olson reported that, with the exception of the fueling software, all other systems at the airport are
compliant for potential problems related to the Year 2000 computer problem. Mn/DOT
Aeronautics contacted the City, ensuring their systems pertaining to air traffic and safety are not
affected by the problem_
NEW BUSINESS
Commission members will contact donors toward the airport project to see whether they care to
be recognized with a bronze plaque.
Upon a motion made by Joe Dooley, seconded by Robert Hantge, the meeting adjourned.
Next Meeting: July 26, 1999 at 5:30 p.m.
Location: Airport Lobby
4 4) -°2
Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting
&nday, June 28, 1999
Members Present: Mary Henke, Paul Wright, Sue Munz, Kay Peterson
Connie Lambert, Newton Potter, Lois Carlson
Members Absent:Richard Peterson, Delores Brunner, Kay Johnson
The - May minutes were read and approved.
old Business: Mary Henke announced that Kay Johnson was appointed
to the PLS Board.
Mary Henke reported the trees by the library entrance will be replaced
by smaller ornamental trees and the city will handle this.
sue Munz reported on the banners
of the various selections it was
2 colors @ $1
Brackets
Set up fee
Total
for the library. After a discussion
decided to purchase eight banners.
23.00 = $984.00
$384.00
$130.00
$1498.00
Linda Goetz, the children's librarian presented an update on the
children's summer program. The program is progressing very well. In the
2 to 6 year old group, 86 have signed up, and the 6 to 14 year olds, 146
ve signed up for a total of 232 children. Linda reported on the need
r more shelving and reported that David Gehrke had been contacted and
ould match the present shelves for a price of $485.00. After a
discussion the motion was made by Sue Munz and seconded by Connie
Lambert to accept the bid of David Gehrke.
Mary reported on the stucco and ceiling repairs. An invoice from
Stacy Stucco Drywall Co. to repair stucco parapets and clean and paint
plaster ceiling was read for a total of $1325.00. Mark Hensen had
inspected the area and recommended the payment be made.
Mary updated the group on the Technology commitee meeting, (formerly the
Automation committee). Two libraries are automated and running, and
Hutchinson will be by fall or winter.
it was announced that five clay vases, a sculpture and a painting by
Ruth Merrill Petersen were presented to the library by Joey Willmert and
Walter Clay in memory of their mother, Elaine Clay.
ATTENTION BOARD MEMBERS: There will be no July board meeting
meeting will be August 30, the 5th Monday.
The meeting was adjourned.
Lois Carlson, Secretary
•
The next
`14ef) '�
u
Amount
364,5DO.00
200,000.00
300,071.92
300, 000.00
168,935.62
(80,504.90)
300,000.00
161,617.93
(46,640.56)
100,000.00
200,000.00
500,000.00
208,371.04
(131,120.09)
399,625.00
500,0017.00
600,000.00
400,000.00
400,1300.00
400,000.00
400,000.00
400,000.00
600,0130.00
199,750.0 --
200,000.00
300,000.00
1,211,3x8.60
200, 000.00
500,000.00
$9,253,994.56
- Y 'F
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
•
23- Jul -99
June 30, 1999
Date
Date
Interest
Of
Of
Institution
Description
Rate
Purchase
Maturity
TREAS BONDS
644136
7.18%
12112/91
2/15/2001
Smith Barney
GNMA 865M7
6.70%
9/04197
9/042D02
Smith Barney
313400 S H 7
5.00%
12130193
03110100
Smith Barney
FHLB 3133m2-u
6.015%
02/05/98
02/05103
Prudential
pool 336914
7.226%
12 31 96
02 01 2026
Expected life 6.2 years
Smith Barney
FNMA
6.100%
012098
01 2005
Prudentail
pool 336399
7.270%
1231 96
0201 2026
Expected life 4.1 years
Citizens, Marquette
4.00%
04/25196
06101/2001
Firstate, First Minnesota
Prudential
Fed Home Laon
6.00%
01/28/98
07/28/03
Smith Barney
FNMA
6.13%
03/10/99
03/10/06
Smith Barney
FNMA pass thru
7.50 0 /6
12/20/95
06/01102
REPAYMENT
Prudential
Fed Home Loan
6.00%
10/26/01
1026/01
Marquette
1847'1692
5.25%
04/15/99
04/14/00
Firstate
411235266
5.80%
05/14/98
06/17/99
Citizens Bank
29860
5.25%
052a/99
05/31/00
1St American
29852
5.60%
D9 10 98
09 16 99
Marquette
184T1721
5.750%
04/15199
10/14/99
Citizens Bank
29837
5.600%
11 1298
08 12 99
1 St American
88526
5.60%
09 10 98
07 29 99
First Federal
411252287
5.30 0 /6
10 30 98
081299
Prudential
FHL
5.79%
11 1898
11 1805
Cell 2/16/99 and therafter
First Federal
5.15%
020599
02 10 DO
First Federal
411252279
5.35%
103098
112999
Smith Barney
Money Market
5.01%
03 15 99
061699
Citizens Bank
1635
5.150%
02 25 99
02 28 00
First Federal
411252295
5.15%
02 11 99
02 10 DO
u
Amount
364,5DO.00
200,000.00
300,071.92
300, 000.00
168,935.62
(80,504.90)
300,000.00
161,617.93
(46,640.56)
100,000.00
200,000.00
500,000.00
208,371.04
(131,120.09)
399,625.00
500,0017.00
600,000.00
400,000.00
400,1300.00
400,000.00
400,000.00
400,000.00
600,0130.00
199,750.0 --
200,000.00
300,000.00
1,211,3x8.60
200, 000.00
500,000.00
$9,253,994.56
- Y 'F
1999P
JUNE 1998
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL JUNE
MONTH
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FI�CIAL REPORT
1999 1999
JUNE MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEARTO
MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL
1999
1999 1999 JUNE
ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE
BUDGET REMAINING USED
TAXES
600,000.00
654,302.22
1,787.73
652,514.49
654,302.22
1,685,972.00
1,031,669.78
LICENSES
135.00
457.00
4,114.38
(3,657.38)
24,967.00
30,200.00
5,233.00
PERMITS AND FEES
51,505.81
49,613.92
30,470.31
19,143.61
171,403.76
241,000.00
69,596.24
INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE
19,287.63
17,675.57
18,912.21
(1,236.64)
116,245.66
2,554,009.00
2,437,763.34
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
87,467.72
161,142.19
15,305.64
145,836.55
473,071.61
1,102,949.00
629,877.39
FINES & FORFEITS
3,798.07
4,200.81
6,012.01
(1,811.20)
19,172.73
65,000.00
45,827.27
INTEREST
15,239.79
46,234.13
4,864.18
41,369.96
129,832.51
50,000.00
(79,832.51)
SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
2,748.70
(2,365.86)
509.35
(2,875.21)
586.72
500.00
(86.72)
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUND
1,250.00
2,132.43
195.35
1,937.08
201,107.98
1,154,050.00
952,942.02
REIMBURSEMENTS
(7,938.59)
(8,579.62)
(2,241.44)
(6,338.18)
55,274.38
71,650.00
16,375.62
SALES
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
0.00
(500.00)
TOTAL
773,994.13
925,312.79
79,929.71
845,383.08
1,846,464.57
6,955,330.00
5,108,865.43
I
38.81%
82.67%
71.12%
4.55%
42.89%
29.50%
259.67%
117.34%
17.43%
77.14%
26.55%
! ! !
EXPENSE REPORT
GENERALFUND
MAYOR & COUNCIL
6,260.20
2,886.10
4,795.35
(1,907.25)
24,305.05
61,989.00
37,683.95
39.21%
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
16,056.80
15,835.40
15,795.65
39.75
99,226.83
195,945.00
96,718.17
50.64%
ELECTION'
111.80
246.20
0.51
245.69
246.75
4,300.00
4,053.25
5.74%
FINANCt
?4.562.20
22,602.70
18,154.55
4,448.15
150,956.88
329,343.00
178,386.12
45.84%
MOTOR VENICE
"7 90
9,924.60
12,810.96
(2,886.36)
65,196.31
138,015.00
72,818.69
47.24%
ASSESSING
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31,500.00
31,500.00
0.00%
LEGAL
7,225,00
8,800.90
7,248.70
1,552.20
47,149.87
87,900.00
40,750.13
53.64%
PLANNING
4,001.00
9,727.20
9,644.35
82.85
45,834.76
94,607.00
48,772.24
48.45%
POLICE DEPARTMENT
151,187.00
169,993.50
117,410.60
52,582.90
862,875.88
1,588,220.00
725,344.12
54.33%
SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER
1,502.80
4,558.50
3,861.81
696.69
30,423.33
105,100.00
74,676.67
28.95%
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
776.00
878.60
270.08
608.52
1,062.76
4,000.00
2,937.24
26.57%
SAFETY COUNCIL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
250.00
250.00
0.00
100.00%
FIRE DEPARTMENT
12,773.70
7,283.20
4,145.41
3,137.79
73,598.95
261,452. DO
187,853.05
28.15%
FIRE MARSHAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00%
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
14,749.20
11,227.60
11,397.33
32,860.17
67,513.74
143,15-4.00
75,640.26
47.16%
ENGINEERING
40,126.10
36,236.60
27,922.23
(18,530.93)
207,984.26
421,085.00
213,100.74
49.39%
STREETS & ALLEYS
75,245.80
44,257.50
37,789.72
(29,153.32)
311,006,30
648,737.00
337,730.70
47.94%
STREET MAINTENANCE A/C
13,810.40
9,391.30
8,697.33
2,032.47
68,456.62
93,830.00
25,373.38
72.96%
CITY HALL
8,054.30
8,636.40
8,891.95
27,446.25
48,543.39
99,062.00
50,518.61
49,00%
PARK/REC ADMIN.
10,525.30
10,729.80
9,744.01
(2,623.91)
76,255.86
152,074.00
75,818.14
50.14%
RECREATION
37,528.70
36,338.20
8,079.11
(959.01)
93,373.40
209,908.00
116,534.60
44.48%
SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER
9,533.00
7,120.10
5,846.88
(2,234.18)
38,080.10
100,595.00
62,514.90
37.85%
CIVIC ARENA
7,205.40
3,612.70
13,217.78
(9,605.08)
89,406.25
189,100.00
99,693.75
4718%
PARK DEPARTMENT
76,676.00
81,025.50
59,060.28
21,965.22
388,608.15
671,916.00
283,307.85
57.84%
RECREATION BUILDING & POOL
12,183.50
13,817.50
5,368.86
8,448.64
53,724.82
99,064.00
45,339.18
54.23%
LIBRARY
2,334.90
22,563.70
22,420.58
143.12
73,939.05
112,227.00
38,287.95
65.88%
CEMETERY
8,703.90
6,801.90
8,018.77
(1,216.87)
45,914.60
90,414.00
44,499.40
50.78%
DEBT SERVICE
3,384.50
82,118.40
786.27
81,332.13
88,302.90
97,873.00
9,570.10
90.22%
AIRPORT
3,100.60
4,966.40
1,655.35
3,311.05
18,056.83
45,270.00
27,213.17
39.89%
TRANSIT
7,028.50
8,943.70
10,045.89
(1,102.19)
58,294.17
117,426.00
59,131.83
49.64%
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(2,552.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
#DIV /0!
UNALLOCATED
37,210.00
75,864.90
17,881.51
57,983.39
269,599.29
760,974.00
491,374.71
35.43%
TOTAL
598,642.50
716,391.10
450,961.81
228,697.89
3,398,187.10
6,955,330.00
3,557,142.90
48.86%
• 0 !
1999
CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT
JUNE
1998
1999
REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL
JUNE
JUNE
MONTHLY OVER (UNDER)
YEAR TO
ADOPTED
BALANCE
MONTH
MONTH
BUDGET
BUDGET
DATE ACTUAL
BUDGET
REMAINING
TAXES
600,000.00
654,302.22
1,787.73
652,514.49
654,302.22
1,685,972.00
1,031,669.78
LICENSES
135.00
457.00
4,114.38
(3,657.38)
24,967.00
30,200.00
5,233.00
PERMITS AND FEES
51,505.81
49,613.92
30,470.31
19,143.61
171,403.76
241,000.00
69,596.24
INTERGOVERNMENT REVENUE
19,287.63
17,675.57
18,912.21
(1,236.64)
116,245.66
2,554,009.00
2,437,763.34
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
87,467.72
161,142.19
15,305.64
145,836.55
473,071.61
1,102,949.00
629,877.39
FINES & FORFEITS
3,798.07
4,200.81
6,012.01
(1,811.20)
19,172.73
65,000.00
45,827.27
INTEREST
15,239.79
46,234.13
4,864.18
41,369.96
129,832.51
50,000.00
(79,832.51)
SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS
2,748.70
(2,365.86)
509.35
(2,875.21)
586.72
500.00
(86.72)
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUND
1,250.00
2,132.43
195.35
1,937.08
201,107.98
1,154,050.00
952,942.02
REIMBURSEMENTS
(7,938.59)
(8,579.62)
(2,241.44)
(6,338.18)
55,274.38
71,650.00
16,375.62
SALES
500.00
500.00
0.00
500.00
500.00
0.00
(500.00)
TOTAL
773,994.13
925,312.79
79,929.71
845,383.08
1,846,464.57
6,955,330.00
5,108,865.43
0.00
General Govt.
75,609.20
106,363.30
77,342.01
29,021.29
481,459.84
1,042,661.00
561,201.16
Public Safety
180,988.70
274,435.50
137,085.23
89,886.07
1,035,724.66
2,102,176.00
1,066,451.34
Streets & Alleys
129,182.30
28,757.50
74,409.28
(45,651.78)
587,447.18
1,163,652.00
576,204.82
Parks & Recreation
155,986.80
128,139.50
123,737.50
15,134.80
813,387.63
1,534,884.00
721,496.37
Miscellaneous
56,875.50
178,695.30
38,387.79
140,307.51
480,16779
1,111,957.00
631,789.21
TOTAL
598,642.50
716,391.10
450,961.81
228,697.89
3,398,187.10
6,955,330.00
3,557,142.90
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
23- Jul -99 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
UNAUDITED -1999
SALES
LIQUOR
WINE
BEER
MISCELLANEOUS
QUANTITY DISCOUNTS
TOTAL
COST OF SALES
GROSS PROFIT
ff`kF:]
05,297.66
143,531.94
702,818.57
52,929.80
(13,227.22)
.291,350.75
986,703.84
304,646.91
23.59%
OPERATING
EXPENSE
SALARIES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CLOTHING & PERSONAL EQUIPMENT
LOGIS - COMPUTER OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE - SUPPLIES
SMALL TOOLS
DEPRECIATION
COMMUNICA
UTILITIES
MAINTENANCE & ALARM & CONSULTING
PRINTING
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
TRAVEL, SCHOOL & CONFERENCES
ADVERTISING
DUES & SUBSCRITIONS
RENTALS
MISC.
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
OPERATING INCOME
OTHER REVENUES /EXPENSES
MISC. - Lottery
Sale of Property
Contributions & Donations
INTEREST - INCOME
INTEREST - EXPENSE
TOTAL OTHER
NET INCOME
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
JUNF
7.05% 91,090.01
1.62% 20,940.07
8,808.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
229.08
0.00
13,057.13
1,192.48
8,119.77
6,248.18
51.25
3,72"
6-
21,446.08
119.95
1,808.58
377.30
135,589.76 175,843.09
9.97% 128,803.83
(3,244.69)
0.00
801.12
3,667.36
(4,639.98)
(3,416.19)
125,387.64
0.00
• ORDINANCE NO. 99-262
PUBLICATION NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA,
AUTHORIZING THE SALE, DISPOSITION OR TRANSFER OF CERTAIN ASSETS
TO RIDGEVIEW CHANHASSEN CLINIC, A MINNESOTA NON -PROFIT
CORPORATION.
THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON ORDAINS:
Section 1. The City Council for the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the
sale, transfer and disposition of certain assets owned by the City of Hutchinson, to Ridgeview
Chanhassen Clinic, a Minnesota non -profit corporation, namely the W insted Family Practice
Clinic along with certain equipment, contracts and trade names associated thereto.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 27 day of July, 1998.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
Its City Administrator
Published in the Hutchinson Leader
First reading:
Second reading:
r�
Marlyn Torgerson
Its Mayor
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
RESOLUTION NO. 11263
Resolution for Exemption from Uniform Municipal contracting Law
Whereas, the City of Hutchinson recognizes the importance of Year 2000
remediation, planning, and preventative actions; and
Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has identified water plant control system as
having problems functioning in the year 2000, due to what is commonly referred to as a
Year 2000 problem; and
Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has determined that the actual failure of the
above mention controls are related to the delivery of water services; and
Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has identified planning, remediation, and
preventative actions for addressing the Year 2000 problems, as prepared by the supplier
of said control, Quality Flow Systems; and
Whereas, the costs of said actions would normally be subject to the Uniform
Municipal Contracting Law, Minn. Stat. Sec. 471.345; and
Whereas, the City of Hutchinson has determined that there is an urgency to
implementing these actions as identified in this resolution on order to prevent an impact
on the infrastructure or delivery of municipal services; and
Whereas, such urgency is heightened by the constrained time schedule given by Quality
Flow Systems; and
Whereas, any delay in the implementation of these actions would pose a threat to
the public and delivery of municipal water supply;
Therefore, be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson hereby determines that the
planning, remediation, and preventative efforts identified in this resolution shall be
exempt from the Uniform Municipal Contracting law, Minn. Stat. Sec. 471.345, pursuant
to 1999 Minn. Laws Ch. 250, Art. 2, Section 6; and
0
Resolution number 11263
Page 2
Be if further resolved, that staff shall take all necessary and appropriate
measures to implement the planning, remediation, and preventative actions for addressing
the Year 2000 problems as it relates to the municipal water supply.
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of Juy, 1999.
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
1. Name of Applicant e od Cc 7 tai' 4 S S V ( q 4
Address
2. Organization r� / fi/borfrc� //
Address �fou P ti -t�.�� �cit' ltu�cli,t�;o�i) s53 S z
3. Location & Time Z, Are' -/0" .0 q�y
4. Date of Dance c(Qu_ U
5. Band Already BoBooked Ak �e' C
G. Name of Band -dS Q17.,g y e -e oe x,, Misr
7. Have you run dances m Hutchinson before? S
Elsewhere? �t)
Signature of Applicant
8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: zxy"
Q �
9. Action of City Council:
10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *:
*(Payable in Advance) g vdj 46QW(„Q
-
6/99 0Aln DA1D
? ' 1999 1 1 - 1 , 1999
r: =.�
iuL 14 1999
CITY Ur HUTCHINSON
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
1. NameofApplicant
326 -ss L-2- 6'2
Address /3 C�
/G fl
ST /� <
_ ( 3LEi)r,6P
2. Organization
Address
�. Location &Time G014!?� RQ�,ihrQ1 0
4. Date of Dance A (1 <
5. Band Already Booked
6. Name of Band S O � ) N ot_
7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? N (�
Elsewhere?
Signature of Applicant
8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: - / Vd J � -
9. Action of City
10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *:
*(Payable in Advance)
- 6/99 to
RE-CEMED
IL 1 4 1494
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT Cl ui- HUTCHINSON
FEE $50.00
1. Name of Applicant _ �: `� , {1 L r� C 1 0 37.0 �6 5
Address
2. Organization
Address
3. Location & Time Aa A 1 0 t AL l'r ).g 2A n r, 0 ��
4. Date of Dance ,/�� /, _� Ti; �2z C4 (,L G,)
5. Band Already Booked \ y 1 U NN ��
6i - Name ofBand ! \ k C y N
7. Have you ran dances in Hutchinson before?
Elsewhere?
Signature of App 'cant
8 Recommendation of of Police:
ye �N _
9. Action of City Council:
10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired (S32/Hr.) *:
*(Payable in Advance)
6/99 X y K o � Sa
G —zg�9R
RECEIVED
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERT
FEE $50.00
--rn �-:`-HUTCHINSOry*
C°
1. Name of Applicant -� S E �� �� tF7C� /2 �(c ''- 3
1
Address
2. Organization
Address
3. Location & Time N DTI () N A J-
4. Date of Dance Sef- 1Ze P � S W Ito rytui
6. Name of Band
7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? 1
Elsewhere? \
Signature of Applicant
8 Recommendation of Chief of Police: LUM La
` Ap g�� &
C:
10.
Action of City Council:
Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32
*(Payable in Advance)
6/99
m
0
I - `!
RECioF+';?
UI. 3999
CITY pr HUI CHINSON
• APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
1. Name of Applicant —sOc�E ���L/'0 ( - ,5 -
Address �ri,F' 6iFR,r
2. Organization
Address
3. Location & Time N r11 co t4 t� A_i")1,,�
+. Date of Dance
5. Band Already Booked X E t o u Nf�s
6. Name of Band P I E)( ac> <.j N f�N
7. Have you run dances in Hutchinson before? N D
Elsewhere?
!1
P P lo
Signature of Applicant
8 Recom m mendation of Chief Police: PaOM� L�4J 4V-Zr � C 4d7 -
Nd JTa(' }J
9. Action of City Council:
10. Fees and Expenses of Police Officer Hired ($32/Hr.) *:
*(Payable in Advance)
. - 6/99 D --1
/� -2
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
POLICE SERVICES
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Steve Madson, Director of Police/Emergency Mgt.
DATE: July 16, 1999
RE: Out of State Training Request
Services'
I have been invited to attend the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children Chief
Executive Officer training course. The course will be conducted on September 19-20, 1999
at the Jimmy Ryce Law Enforcement Training Center in Arlington, VA.
The course relates directly as to how law enforcement should respond to child abductions
or exploited children cases, the resources that are available and how to deal with the high
impact of major media attention. The course fees are bome by the National Center and
most of the travel costs are also. I would anticipate driving my personal vehicle to the
course, which would require one night lodging out and back. The only expenses I would
ask the city to pay would be the two nights lodging.
I think this is a tremendous opportunity to obtain outstanding and relevant training in a very
sensitive area and, therefore, request approval to attend.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this memorandum, please contact me at
your earliest convenience.
/Ikg
cc: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
99 -01 -0005
111
'-p
cunov Tuom _ t 1 nn nn
turn ne.
PMAM "ON SALE"
11
*tote of jftnootd,
COUNTr OP..__t1 GSty
To the., .............. C.Ity .. GowRG.;U .................... Of the .......... G.Uy ...................... of .... m. Sc;h msn...............
.............................................................. ..............................+ to of Minnesota:
hereby appl*&.. for a hearse for the 6enw of-
L/ZL usF a
from
_-2
18 99_, to sell
At Retail Only, Non- intorieating Malt Liquors,
as the same am defined by law, for consumption ' 0,o a certain pm nbse her
denribed as follwa,
at whiah plea said applieant_yppuo,_ tU bud,,,
and to that and rspeant__cnd star. as fa3wos:
I 1
J
"se. r .n. ,.es� s o. a � .,ermbri
Reco®end approval with restrictions and requireniailts as in the past.
Driver's License I.D. to be required for purchase.
Se ve Hadsan, Police Chief
Each applicant further states that _he is not now the holder of, nor has —he mode application for,
nor does ___he intend to make application for a Federal Setaii Dealer's Special tax stamp for the sale of
intoxicating liquor.
•
That said applicant_' . ._.af the United Stabs; of joad maul aharaotor
and repute; and ha_..__ atinin r the ajs of 11 yeas; thud__.__._._..._...._._. proprietor_-..uf the
establishment for whrah the Uns as rill be issued if this applio am b jranead.
That no manufaotu er of soak nondnta —&kxjf malt liquors has any ownerddp, in whole or in part,
in said business of said applicant or any Ent~ therein;
That said applioa,t._maka._lhb appUoaU= pursuant and subfset so all the laws Of As State of
Minnesota and the ordinansM and rejalatia r of raid_.L
appiicable thereto, which are hereby made a part hereof, and hereby atm --io oiwroe and obey the some;
Doted_ ° jg am
ll 2 1 1999
crt«num ew
1ppl6sa,1._
P.O.
� "Z'
Hutchinson City Center
•
DATE: July 21, 1999
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, NIN 553542522
324587 -51S VFm 320-2344240
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH
CARLSON TO CONSTRUCT A 26' X 36' POLE TYPE GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON
STREET SE.
Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On June 16, 1999, Randy and Edith Carlson submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a 26' x
36' pole type garage on then property at 426 Huron Street. The property is zoned R2 and is approximately 8,712 square
feet (.20 acres). The site plan provides the pole building will be 6 feet from the adjoining property line, 10 feet off of
the alley, and 30 feet from the south property line. The extra distance on the south line is to allow for a side entrance
for the three -car building. The height of the building would not exceed 16 feet, as required by the code.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, July 8, 1999.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requirements of a conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The building materials be similar to the existing duplex.
2. The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly.
TERMS: City reserves the right to review all conditional use permits at their discretion.
Respectfully submitted,
William Arndt, Acting Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
C�
cc: Randy and Edith Carlson, 426 Huron St. S.E., Hutchinson, MN 55350
Printed on recycled paper -
0
d I H L
, Rk Ave SE
Indicates Location of Property
Aw
Higkkgktpd Properties
krdfcate motke area j3501
4
f ,4
OKI
Higkkgktpd Properties
krdfcate motke area j3501
0
3 q4- par sgu". -
I er Su 4k Y- �
fa
2<
0
7s -tW , 4S vo-v
W . r yvo
A/Z Numn Straf SZ^
V
C
77 -
�
C,
r
rt
M
y
L
,oS
I
1 �
I
i
y
7
U
'o
M
y
L
,oS
I
1 �
I
i
y
7
U
i
A
W z l.t �jo --:� C-\ OLX i Y\S�eCA 0 �),
Lo�oyc�- �De- -
-�(:) rv V ho+i se. Co�oA(5�
i
)1 -1
RESOLUTION NO. 11264
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 10.12 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON, TO CONSTRUCT A 26' x 36' POLE TYPE
GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON STREET S.E.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN:
FINDINGS
Randy and Edith Carlson, have made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit
under Section 10.12 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct a 26' x 36' pole type garage located in the
R -2 (Multiple family residence) District at 426 Huron St. S.E.. with the following legal description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 45 South 1 /2 City
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect
of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
0
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
The building materials be similar to the existing duplex.
The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly.
Adopted by the City Council this 27' day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
9
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
T _ I _
Hutchinson City Center
I 11
u
DATE: July 21, 1999
111 H---n Stmt SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522
320.587- 5151/Fu 320.230 -4240
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL
REITER TO CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL TO BE LOCATED IN AN VC
(INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT) AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW
Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its
findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit.
HISTORY
On June 17, 1999, Curtis and Janel Reiter submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a veterinary
hospital at 760 Century Avenue SW. The site is currently vacant. The proposed building is 4,800 square feet. • The
property is approximately 68,750 square feet or 1.58 acres. The theater is located to the west and Clock Tower Plan
is located to the east.
0 FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid.
2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, July 8, 1999.
3. The proposal is in conformance with the requ of a conditional use permit.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The plan was revised and submitted on July 20, 1999, to provide the required setback from the interior
property line; and additional tree location; and screening for the northern portion of the property.
2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building.
3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking requirements would need to be
reviewed.
TERMS: City reserves the right to review all conditional use permits at their discretion.
Respectfully submitted,
William Arndt, Acting Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
0 cc: Curtis and Janel Reiter, 715 Goebel St. S.W., Hutchinson, MN 55350
Primed on recycled paper- # �! .) —Z
Indicates Location of Property
N7ghHghted Properties
bdieate notice area (350')
L' krt,5 % -dane I2el 4ec-
0
`t rtV� .
L C''(1 tir
r�
�J
S
SITE PLAN
RESOLUTION NO. 11265
RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 8.13 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 464
REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER, TO CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY
HOSPITAL LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVE. S.W.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN:
FINDINGS
•
Curtis and Janel Reiter, have made application to the City Council for a Conditional Use Permit under
Section 8.13 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464 to construct an approximately 5,000 sq. ft. veterinary hospital
located in the I/C (Industrial/Commercial) District at 760 Century Ave. S.W. with the following legal
description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: East '' /z Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds Addition
2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the
proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect
of the use on the Comprehensive Plan.
3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent
•
of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the fo `Hawing conditions:
1. The plan was revised to provide the required setback from the interior property
line; and additional tree location; and screening for the northern portion of the
property. Submitted 7 -20-99
2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building.
3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking
requirements would need to be reviewed.
Adopted by the City Council this 27i day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
•
•
C
Center
11111 n Street SE
Hutchlmmn, MN 55350.2522
320.587- 5151/Fn 320.234 -4240
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 21, 1999
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF 130'X 30' PORTION OF STREET DEDICATED
FOR PUBLIC USE LYING SOUTH OF LOT 6, IN STUCKE'S 1 ST ADDITION.
Pursuant to Section 5.972 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planing Commission is hereby
submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request.
Legal Description: 130' X 30' portion of street lying south of Lot 6, Block 1, Stucke's 1st
Addition
l r�
u
HISTORY
The applicant is requesting the allowance of vacation of platted right of way located in Stucke's I st Addition.
It appears that there was a vacation of this right of way at some point in the past, but there is no
documentation of the vacation. The issue arose at the closing for one of the properties.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on
Thursday, July 8 and Tuesday July 13, 1999.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the vacation.
CONDITIONS:
None
Respectfully Submitted,
William Arndt, Acting Chairman
Hutchinson Planning Commission
cc: Ron McGraw
Printed on recycled paper -
� -�'F) ,-�
STUCKE'S ; st ADDITION TO
r '
t ,J '
W I
Y
6
J
49. 5
90.5 - _ LEWIS AVE
130 3 4 30 9
0 0 0
O 5 O I •
I
B I 10o
N 70.5
° m 4 2
0 7 I r 0 2 0
O 6 I
30 30 111 90.5
SCALE I inch a 100 fr'et
STATE OF MINNESOTA ��•
COUNTY OF- ?AcLEOD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, LEWIS H. MERRILL.
AND THIS PLAT IS A. CORRECT REPRESENTATION 0
CERTIFY THAT THS'OUTSIDE BOUNDARIES ARE CORF
WERE MADE ON THE GROUND AND ARE CORRECTLY S
0
r .�IV�r• a
oSVo o
2 o co
170
0 3 o eSSf
b m , v
e
a osby
o OSia
m
4 co
o '.7
so p '
It ,5 m �4's
rD O 4 t N
0700
X117.811 1 30
90
0
A A
• ` N V
� O
ST. ANASTASIA .
CA HOLIC
S HOOL
0
e
17
g
v � iuv
�1
o7Z o A
7 DST
o I ! 12 3
r • �[•:•
4 4�)--�
C
L-1
DATE: July 22, 1999
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson- NN 55350 -2522
320 - 587- 5151/Fa 320- 2344240
MEMORANDUM
TO: Hutchinson City Council
FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission
0
SUBJECT CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW
HEIGHTS 4 ADDITION SUBMITTED BY BILL GILK LOCATED WEST OF
ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 1 ST ADDITION.
The Planning Commission approved the final plat to be known as Island View Heights 4"'
Addition with the following conditions:
1. Adequate access must be maintained during construction for the purposes
of entering the property for emergency services.
0
cc: Bill Gilk, Scenic Heights Investments, Box 1176, Minnetonka, MN 55345
Pnntcd . recyd,d paper -
4 -(F) .4
i
ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION
5 534. O
e _ _..__.._.___- ___ ______ ___ ___ ___ a
x rvmdm {____ - - AC6f _ _
328
by
8 a 's
'S'p i - 0p•00° YA\ 3 \ � \
a *' ,,, ,� y"b s ,sm x•., a
-a 2108" t, 0
tr"� •A6a348'�
�.. «oxy st • „4ism 9 N i n "a:45g p3G8, j 1
7 .f tb 2� /
p ° Y� ° +• 8 v I ax°. C � . ?! �vj � °p v . i s3a� � ' �U fir i , \
w b s, isu °n I r" 2a ll # ns"'� 1{ 8.:4?, m .G 4 to i 1
32 es w ��� r � S7
O is a 8 Y el S a 12 G ' s ,rzK 43 ✓ " °` sµ�" ..
v ,.t { 8. °°° 1 „°aD° n31 8. a r l .f` � •8 p`�°1'�
Z x 3 8 "e p°a a a a� iY Z w
I 38
I C 40 J C ar r 50 axx : ' x _' S a a 6 °s.. rv. 51 t a w,
„� I -n
nt8 " ��'.2 8 esoo� un.'wY brxra B 3 @a �41
vn .. vLV A g RA IS g e. ^ ev M y2$ -p $a 5 Vim° .. ....
1 \ ° k a`e 3 C E 17S M lfl' _ - A $ ".271 R i � tk �;� 6 e w .r " � a.w H 4 R
_. e.^8'"xveT m a 4 5t• .e6 'Y3 ' ° a Car r ^s;`•�8458 • �8'a,n, °• k h/ I
4t ° "° •'
Jp,z7 "nos % e g $ E g 4'�s mo asa a ' ,r %rri 2. m.iro 8' S
17 44
N66' 9 52 - W
tie
�
- X87 f,p R �' r 4 � j 7 p � 0 ' 0
a '.� $� a +: , 4 , .s . ia'� ° avi I I r.�
- --- ----- — S 0171'35'26'
—`�a� 41 b. p,'"��,.9e m 1 i� \0,t•A/ e n I I /
821
228 4'. 8 ?� , �.�'C;" \ \ ; i I / / t'.AKE
1 � r
------------ I
II I I 1 I -� A_IOOVOY' Di i�l 1 i• / I I ae✓• ^.
1 I 1 I I I \ I I b l w l
w. Mw Ine weal BENa UMM M"
in IrAn x I, , 0 +I "� HEw ICGX6 Icp °I .h..°II °t IM Ir 4'( -i
0
0
F- -I
L __A
Cv �O
a�
0
Q
LYNN
T ->16N
R -3011
I�1
U
RESOLUTION NO. 11266
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAIN VIEW
HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION LOCATED ALONG PRAIRIE VIEW DRIVE S'
WHEREAS, Mr. Bill Gilk, Scenic Heights Investments., has submitted a fmal pi- . be known
as ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION of said subdivision in the manner required platting of
land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had there.. �r, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and tf� _alations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of 1 T. .:,son and
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-wit;
Legal Description: Oudot A, Island View Heights Third Addition, according to the plat thereof
on file and of record in the office of the McLeod Counth Recorder,
McLeod County Recorder, McLeod County, Minnesota
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
That said fmal plat of ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4TH ADDITION is hereby approved
and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans
and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to
the following conditions:
Adequate access must be maintained during construction for the purposes
of entering the property for emergency services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT such execution of the certification upon said plat by Mayor
and City Administrator, as required, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the
subdivider and City Officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on
record forthwith without further formality.
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Mayor
orgerson
0
# -(r)- �L
HUTCHI T e N PLL NNII G 1 MMISSION FOR YOUR
W
2.
The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Bill Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Dave
Westlund, Jim Haugen, Jeff Jones, Dean Krchoff, and Jeff Haag. Absent Dean Wood. Also present Julie Wischnack,
Director of Planning and Zoning; Bonnie Baumetz, Planning and Zoning; Richard Schieffer, City Legal Counsel; John
Rodeberg, Director of Engineering; Mark Hensen, Building Official; and Dolf Moon, Director of Parks and Recreation
CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M.
CONSENT AGENDA
a) CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING DATED JUNE 15, 1999
Mr. Westund made a motion to approve the minutes. Seconded by Mr. Haag the motion carried unanimously.
3.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY RANDY AND EDITH CARLSON TO
CONSTRUCT A 26'X 36' POLE TYPE GARAGE LOCATED AT 426 HURON ST.
Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:34 p.m. with the reading of publication 86038 as published in
The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Baumetz explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a conditional use permit to construct a 26'
x 36' pole type garage located at 426 Huron Street SE. The property is zoned R -2 and is approximately 8,712
square feet (.20 acres). The site plan provides the pole building will be 6 feet from the adjoining property line,
10 feet off of the alley, and 30 feet from the south property line. The extra distance on the south line is to allow
for a side entrance for the three-car building. The height of the building would not exceed 16 feet, as required
by the code.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions:
1. The building materials to be similar to the existing duplex.
2. The existing accessory building be removed and be disposed of properly.
Mr. Westiund moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Krchoff, the hearing closed at 5:40 p.m. Mr.
Westlund made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr.
Kirchoff. The motion carried unanimously.
b) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE-PERMIT _REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER TO
CONSTRUCT A VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATED IN AN VC DISTRICT AT 760 CENTURY AVE_ SW
Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:41 p.m. with the reading of publication #6039 as published in
The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Wischnack said the property owners are requesting a conditional use permit to construct a veterinary
hospital at the above listed address. The site is currently vacant. The proposed building is 4,800 square feet.
The property is approximately 68,750 square feet or 1.58 acres. The theater is located to the west and Clock
Tower Plaza is located to the east.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit because it meets the review criteria of Section 6.07
(132). Approval would be with the following conditions:
•
1. The plan is revised to provide the required setback from the interior property line; an additional tree
location; and screening for the northern portion of the property. (A revised plan was submitted July 20,
1999.)
2. A building permit must be acquired for construction of the building.
3. If the building is enlarged or the business expands in the future, parking requirements would need to
be reviewed.
Curtis Reiter said the plan submitted is the final plan. In the future, they do have plans to sell off 120' for
another lot
Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Kirchoff the hearing closed at 5:46 p.m. Mr. Haag
made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommendations. Seconded by Mr. Kirchoff
the motion carried unanimously.
C) CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF DEDICATED STREET RIGHT OF WAY LOCATED IN STUCKE'S
FIRST ADDITION
Acting Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of publication 7!6040 as published in
The Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 6, 1999.
Ms. Baumetz said the request is for the allowance of vacation of platted right way located in Stucke'se
Addition. It appears that there was a vacation of this right of way at some por° in the past, but there is no
documentation of the vacation. The issue arose at the closing for one of the prop_rtfes. Staff is recommending
the vacation procedures be followed again, to provide a reaffirmation of the vacated right of way. The county
doesn't have record of vacation.
Virgil Antony, 335 Charles Street, asked if the vacation included the T strip on h;s property. Ms. Baumetz said
she would research the records and contact him. Mr. Antony was in favor of vacating the 7' strip.
Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing, seconded by Mr. Haag the hearing closed at 5:52 p.m. Mr. Haugen
made a motion to recommend approval of the request with staff recommenc;.:ons. Seconded by Mr. Westiund
the motion carried unanimou
4. NEW BUSINESS
a) CONSIDERATION OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS 4 TH ADDITION SUBMITTED
BY BILL GILK
Ms. Wrschnack explained the applicant is requesting the allowance of a final plat to be known as Island View
Heights 0 Addition. The preliminary plat provided for 28 - 2 unit structures and 1 -3 unit strictures. The final
plat presents 25 - 2 unit structures (50 units). Since the units have changed, staff has requested final grading
infomratlon. The location of the units are different than previously presented. Addftionalty, elevation infomtatton
must be provided for each unit A previously constructed storm water pond is located on the southeast portion
of the final plat
Staff recommends approval of the final plat with the following conditions:
1. A blanket easement must be granted for Lot 51, for access by the utility companies.
2. Setbacks for the Fourth Addition will be a 20 foot setback from right of way and a 5 foot setbacK f
the interior drainage and utility easement (private street).
3. Final grading information must be submitted to verify elevation information for the proposed units.
4. Verification that the bottom elevations of the storm water pond are at the same level as provided In the
grading plans. If the elevations do not match, the extra siltation must be removed. (Applicant stated
he was checking 7!6/99.)
5. Sedimentation on the existing streets and in the storm sewers due to construction activities must be
remedied and erosion control measures taken to protect existing infrastructure. --
6. Adequate access must be maintained daring construction for the purposes of entering Theproperty for
emergency services. - - --
Staff is recommending a 5' setback otherwise the conditions have been met Staff has verification of elevations,
sift fencing is in place and the streets are cleaned. No. 6 is a new condition.
Bill Gilk, developer, said this is a twin home development with lots 35' wide 70' deep. They are specialty
designed with 0" lot line setback. The request for 5' setback has been in the last 30 days. This is a untimely
request. He was not notified at the April 19"' preconstruction meeting. Mr. Gilk felt it is untimely change after
the city has approved 25 twin home sites. It is an added expense to correct a previously agreed upon utility
easement.
John Rodeberg said there is a potential risk allowing homes to be built very close totha utiltiy fine, but not a
major concern. If footings on the property within the 5' setback were back dropped it would be a reasonable
setback.
John Rodeberg said they would go back and address the lots in question on an individual basis.
Mr. Haag made a motion to recommend approval of the final plat with condition Item No. 6. Seconded by Mr.
Kirchoff the motion carried. Haag, Kirchoff, Jones, and Arndt casting approval votes and Wesbund and Haug
disapproval.
5. OLD BUSINESS
Accessory building at 546/550 Miller
Ms. Wschnack explained the building being constructed is 1,260 sf. on a vacant lot. A conditional use permit is required
for structures over 1,000 sf. The conditional use permit was reviewed at a public hearing at the Planning Commission
on May 18, 1999. No public comment was received. Planning Commission recommended approval. City Council
reviewed the information and approved the permit on May 25, 1999. The building permit was approved on June 18,
1999. Complaints were received regarding building size, height, possible siding, height of garage doors, possible use,
etc. She also explained the definition of a pole barn as a building with a frame made of wood or metal parts, with metal
panels covering three or more sides and without a full foundation. This building contains a full foundation: therefore is
not defined as a pole bam, regardless of its exterior materials.
Ms. Wischnack explained there are no violations of the code except for Height: 165 (6° too high). The size — over 1000
sf. has been approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are no restrictions on garage door
height. The applicant has stated it will be used for personal storage.
Bruce Briggs, 540 Miller Ave. SW, presented a petition objecting to the construction. He thought it was going to be a
garage that fits in the area. He feels construction equipment will be stored in the garage, and doesn't think steel siding
is consistent with a garage. He also thought this large building might have an adverse affect on their property values.
He doesn't want steel vertical siding.
A Bill K, neighboring property owner on Linden Ave., said he sees no probtem_with steel siding, and feels once grade
level is attained this structure follows city code.
Bruce Briggs said you cannot change grade level to negatively impact the drainage on neighboring property.
Bill Mathews said he is willing adjust the height of the building to 16' by cutting it down at the plate. He also said the
steel siding would be bordered at the bottom with a darker colored wainscoating for a more attractive appearance.
Bruce Briggs said water run off a huge building as this will cause a problem.
Roger Bakken, 750 Lynn Rd., said the city has a drain in the alley to remedy the drainage problem. He has read the
notices in the paper and does not have problem with the garage.
• Dick Schieffer, legal counsel, said the Planning Commission should pass along to the City Council the objections of
the neighboring property owners. There has been no request to revoke the permit so the Planning Commission cannot
make a recommendation to revoke the permit Their responsibility is to give an information report to the City Council.
Staff should prepare minutes to refect all concerns of the neighboring property owners.
Bill Mathews asked the stop work order be lifted, so he can make corrections.
Ms. Wschnack said the request for stop work order to be lifted should be in writing.
Mr. Hensen, Building Official said the framing inspection will be the point at which the height is reverified.
Mr. Westlund made a motion for staff to submit a report including Mr_ Mathews' resolutions to Council seconded
by Mr. Kirchoff. The motion carried unanimously.
6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF
a) PRESENTATION BY DOLF MOON, DIRECTOR OF PARK, REC AND COMMUNITY ED, AND JOHN
RODEBERG, DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, REGARDING FUTURE AND EXISTING TRAILS
b) DISCUSSION OF STREET NAME CHANGE ALONG ADAMS ST.lHWY 22
John Rodeberg is proposing existing Hwy 22 be changed to County Rd 7 and change Adams Street to Bluff
Street.
Staff will send out a survey regarding changing Adams Street to Bluff Street.
• Jeff Haag asked if Lewis Ave. SW could be considered for a one -way west bound street. Mr. Rodeberg said property
owners should submit a petition requesting the change.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business the meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
PUBLICATION NO. 6041
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029
LETTING NO. 41PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99 -04
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 6:00 P.M. on the 27th day of July,
1999, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed
assessment for the improvement of:
Project No. 99 -03 Century Avenue SW from Sunset Street SW to Dale Street SW by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain
and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances;
Project No. 99-04 Dale Street SW from Century Avenue SW Extension to South Grade
Road SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
services, watennain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous
base, bituminous surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances;
You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City
Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th,
• 1999. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such
payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged
through December 31 st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before
the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 10 percent (plus or minus) per year. The
right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until November 15, 1999.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office.
The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 745,552.58 . Written or oral objections will be
considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written
objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer
at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a
proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected
property owners as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will
be followed:
1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions.
This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has
• — further questions.
s--,A
PUBLICATION NO. 6041
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 6029
LETTING NO. 4/ PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99-04
PAGE 2
2. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witness:
or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure i
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objeci
witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, V ay
be considered and argued to the Council as
to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the C .;"cil.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final
presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new
evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30
days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten
days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion,
defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65
years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of
the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law,
all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner
meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the
confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed form for such deferral
of payment of this special assessment on his property.
/Gary D. Plotz/
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, JULY 13TH, 1999 AND TUESDAY,
JULY 20TH, 1999.
E
W
•
4
COMP BY, G IOCE
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029
TE TR , ?G NO.4/PROJP.CT NO.49-03 & 99-01
99-03: CENTURY AVE SW FROM SUNSET ST SW TO DALE ST SW
194h DALE ST SW FROM CENTURY AVE SW EXTENSION TO SOUTH GRADE RD SW
BY CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER Y SERVICES, WATERMAIN 6
SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, BITITKINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING,
7RATJSIDEWAI% AND APPURTENANCES
$ 30.00
SANITARY SEVER COST PER FRONT FOOT
COMPUTED BY: G RICE
$ 30.00
WATERMAIN COS[ PER FRONT' FOOT
CHECKED BYE 1. RODEBERG
S 65.00
STREET /STORM SEWER COST PER FRONT FOOT
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
$ 15.00
GRADTNG/PREP COST PER FRONT FOOT
ADOPTED,
INTEREST RATE,
ACCOUNT
NO.
CITY PI3 NO.
NAME ft ADDRESS
OPR OWNEL
LLGALDISIk@lDON
ADDITION OR SUWT'6iCN1
FRONT
14!Ei'
1N4.[. ARY
Y
WATEKhV0N
STREET&
516WM Z*m
GRADING
PRbNTEELT
GRADING
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY NO.
1
12.11630-02-0450
CROW RIVER APARTMENTS
575 CENTURY AVE SW
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
511 COLEFAX ST
LOT I EX TRACT APPROX 205' X 215'
P O BOX 367
IN NE CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2,
23.421.0020
AUGUSTA WI 54722
CENTURY COURT
70076
$ 21,022.91
S 45,549.40
700.76
S 10,511.40
$ 95,106.40
2
12- 11630039010
CHRIST THE KING LUTHERAN
1040 SOUT1i GRADE RD SW
1040 SOUTH GRADE RD SW
P O BOX 369
5.73 AC IN NE 1/4 NW 1/4 LYING EAST OF
M1,022.80
23.012.0200
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SAR /7, SECTION 12 -11630
235
$ 7,050.00
S 15,275.00
0
S -
$ 29,375.00
3
12- 11630039030
DOUGLAS K PAULA IVSELMANN
1010 DALE ST SW
1010DALESTSW
76 AC OF NE I/4 SW 1/4
23.012.1200
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12 -11630
149
$ 4,470.00
S 4,470.00
S 9,685.00
0
S -
$ 18,625.00
4
12. 11630034010
J. M. & L. E. DANIELSON TRUST
1060 DALE ST SW
J OSEPH K L.E. DANIP.LSON CO.
1060 DALE ST SW
1.50 AC OF I/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.012.1300
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12.11670
1405
f 4,215.00
S 4,215.00
$ 9,13250
0
S -
$ 17,562.50
5
12.11630930050
J. M. k L. E. DANIELSON TRUST
1085 DALE ST SW
J OSEPH K L.E. DANIELSON CO.
1060 DALE ST SW
5.90 AC I/ NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.012.1400
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12.11630
861.5
$ 25,845.00
S 25,845.00
$ 55,997.50
355.57
$ 5,33355
$ 113,021.05
6
12- 11630-034)060
RICHARD k TERISA DOSTAL
1020 DALE ST SW
1020 DALE ST SW
2.23 AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.0111300
HUI'CHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12.11630
117.9
$ 5,637.00
$ 5,637.00
$ 12,213.50
0
S -
S 23,48750
7
12.1163003-0070
PEARLY k G. CHRISTE SEN
1050 DALE ST SW
1050 DALE ST SW
1 AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.012-1600
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12 -11630
1405
$ 4,215.00
$ 4,215.00
$ 9,132.50
0
$ -
$ L7,%2-SO
8
12. 1163003-0080
PEARLY SI G. CHRLS7ENSFN
1040 DALE ST SW
1050 DALE ST SW
I AC OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.012.1700
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12 -11630
139.1
$ 4,173.00
$ 4,173.00
S 9,041.50
0
$ -
S 17}87.50
9
12- 11630-03-0110
IROBERT K KAREN PETERSON
IIODDDALESTSW
16 GROVE ST SW
12.42 AC OF W 112 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
SA- 5029 - Pop 1 of 2
i 0 s
COMPILED BY: G. RICE
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. SOD
LETTING N0.4 /PROJECT NO.55.03 lY ".04
99-05: CENTURY AVE SW FROM SUNSET ST SW TO DALE ST SV
99-06 DAIS ST SV FROM CENTURY AVE SW EXTH4AON TO SOUTH GRADE RD SW
3Y CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEVER, SANITARY SEVER & SERVICES, VAT'RMAIN It
SERVICES, GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING,
TRAIVSIDEVALK AND APPURTENANCES
S 50.00
SANITARY SEVER COST PER FROM FOOT
COMPUTED BY, C. RICE
$ 50.00
VATFRMAIN COST PER FRONT FOOT
CHECKED BY: J. RODERERG
S 65.00
STREET/STORM SEVER COST PER PROM FOOT
NUMBER OP YI I^
ADOPTED. _.. _ -.— ..
-
$ 15.00
GRADING /PREP COST PER FRONT FOOT
"UB It ADDRESS
. ^Tp
- J HUTC1i1NSO:
IEGAL DISOIFFIGN
ADDITION OR SUBI)rn% N
PRONE
FEET
SAEITART
SEVER
I VATTRMAIN
STREET It
STORM SEVER
GRADING
FRONT FEET
GRADING
TOTAL ACTIVE
AMZSSMHNT
T' •'.11430
- <- - TRACTS C k 6 OF
NC:i? - ?.:': :/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4 EX
180
$ 5,400.00
S 5,400.00
S 11,700.00
0
S -
f 22,500.00
10
12- 1143003-0120
WELCOME TO OUR HOME LLC.
44572230TH ST
27.0121200
MORGAN MN 56266
575 AC, SECC' -_ '-!2-11&3014.50 ACRES
719.07
3 21,572.10
$ 21,572.10
S 46,739.55
719.07
S 10 .786.05
S 100,669.50
11
12- 114304)40010
DERRICK INVESTMENT NO. 91 INC
7301 OHMS LN 8560
40.92 AC OF S V2 NW 1/4
23.012.2125
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55439
SECTION 12 -11430
1080.81
S 32,42430
S 32,424.30
S 70,252.65
1050.81
$ 16,212.15
$ 151,313.40
12
12- 1143007-0020
MCLEOD COUN'T'Y AG ASSN
880 CEN'TURY AVE SW
P O BOX 142
LOT 2 EX THE E200', BLOCK 1,
27.319.0020
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION
65071
S 20,421.30
S 20,42130
S 44,246.15
68011
5 10,210.65
S 95,299.40
13
12- 11430-03-0090
JEFFREY THOMAS TRAXLER
1055 DALE ST SW
1
1055 DALE ST SW
TRACT D OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
27.012.1800
HUICHINSON MN 55350
SECTION 12 -11430
187.9
$ 5,637.00
$ 5,637.00
S 12,213.50
0
$ -
$ 27,487 -50
14
12. 11430-03 -0100
MARY WHITE
1065 DAIS ST SW
1065 DALE ST SW
SUT F N820.64' OF W 1/2 NE 1/4 NW 1/4
23.0121900
HUTCHINSON MN 55350
LYING E OF CSAH /7, SECTION 12.11430
137
S 4,110.00
S 4,110.00
S 8,905.00
0
S -
S 17,125.00
TOTAL • ASSESSMENT ROLL 5029
553975
S 166,192.50
$ 166,192.50
$ 360,069.751
$ 53,053.80
$ 745,52258
SA -5029 - Page 2 of 2
C
11
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hu n Street SE
Hutchln m MN 55350 -2522
320 - 587 - 5151X• 320- 2444240
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Century Avenue and Dale Street (Letting No. 4/Project No. 99 -03 and 99 -04)
DATE: July 27, 1999
We have had a number of issues and concerns arise in verbal and written format that need to be
addressed. I though it would be best to respond to all issues in one memorandum for discussion
purposes. After discussion with the Council, individual responses need to be completed to the
appropriate parties. Related letters are attached for your information.
ASSESSMENTS
General Issues
• • The per foot rate proposed is at the very low end of the current cost to build complete residential
utility and street improvements. This rate does not reflect the added cost of the grading, which
is normally completed be the Developer prior to the City becoming involved. It also does not
include the removal of the existing roadway, or the extensive storm sewer improvements needed.
We are assessing added cost on Century Avenue for grading. The City is paying for
approximately half the actual cost to complete the work. I can not recommend lowering the per
foot cost, but understand that the Council may want to review issues related to benefit vs. cost.
• The assessments to properties are essentially high because of the size of the lots. Most lots are
140' or more in width, while a standard City lot is 66 to 80 feet in width. Most of these lots are
not subdividable, and do not meet the 250' lot width criteria in our policy for newly annexed lots
to have a portion of the lot deferred.
• Since the road is at an angle to the street, we in general utilized the narrowest measurement of
rectangular lots, and average widths of irregularly- shaped lots, to determine the assessable
footage. This policy reduced the potential frontage on virtually all properties.
• Most, if not all. of these properties have non - certified septic systems which are inadequately
treating sewage and/or depositing untreated sewage in the area.
Pearly and Genevieve Christiansen (1050 Dale Street)
The Christiansen's own two adjacent lots, each approximately 140' in width. Due to the way the
road splits the property, the northern lot has virtually no frontage on Dale Street, being separated by
a very small portion of property owned by the neighbor to the north. The Christiansen's do not feel
that the northern lot should be assessed at all. since it has no direct access and no direct frontage. In
• m discussions it was noted that the current lot is unbuildable without sewer and water, and without
some type of access. It is our proposal to make the assessment deferred until the lot is buildable.
Therefore if the lot remains undeveloped, no assessment is due. However, if the lot is developed the
cost of the assessments reflects the added value of the lot becoming buildable.
Primed m mycled paper - �— A
r '1
U
Lucille and Merlyn Danielson
The Danielson's own two properties, each with substantial frontage. The smaller lot with the 11,
on it fronts on Dale Street. The lot actually has several hundred feet of frontage, but the sou n
portion of the lot is lowland, and the lot has an irregular shape. We are proposing to assess the 1h
of that portion of the lot used for the house, which is similar in width to other residential lot .the
area.
The larger, undeveloped lot is east of Dale Street at the corner with Century Avenue. We gave the
lot a corner credit of 150' (not standard policy for undeveloped property) due to its unusual shape,
and also averaged lot widths. Upon further review we did not appropriately credit the parcel for
right -of -way width and would recommend reducing the deferred assessment on Dale Street by 60
front feet, and the assessment on Century Avenue by 33 front feet. This would reduce the assessment
from $113,021.05 to $100,901.05 (a reduction of $12,120). Residential lot rates have typical run in
the $45,000 to 60,000 /acre range based on '/< acre lots. This rate is well less than half of that cost.
We agree that it is a substantial sum, however it does not appear to he excessive in comparison to
value -added to the parcel for development purposes.
Richard and Teresa Dostal
The Dostal's have a large lot which has over 200 feet of frontage and over 400 feet of depth. The
parcel could be subdivided in the future into more than one lot. We adjusted (reduced) the front
footage to the narrowest width of the lot (187.9'). Since the lot is less than 250' in width it does not
qualify for the current deferral policy. We would recommend consideration of deferring a portion •
of the assessment due to he irregular shape of the lot, however the total value of the assessments to
the parcel does not appear to be in excess of the long -range value to the parcel.
Trail Location
The property owner's on the west side of the road have petitioned to move the trail to the east side
of the road. We believe that the west side is the appropriate location because:
• The sidewalk/trail location on Dale Street north of South Grade Road is on the west side of the
street. Since the road is shifted to the west to provide more room for the trail north of South
Grade Road, shifting the trail to the east side south of South Grade Road would cause the roads
to be misaligned.
• The Dale Street and South Grade Road intersection is at a skew, creating more difficult site lines,
and more complicated turning movements and pedestrian crossing locations. Moving the trail
to the east side would require two crossings at this intersection, while leaving it on the west side
would only require one crossing.
Based on our initial and follow -up review, we strongly support our original plan to have the trail on
the west side of Dale Street.
cc: Gary Plotz —City Adminis=or
Cal Rice. John Olson— Engineering/Public Works
file: 19991L4
•
• July 12,1999
To: City Council
City of Hutchinson, Mn
Dear City Council:
The subject of this letter is the proposed Project No.99 -04 Dale Street improvements and
to address the issues we have concerning the assessments on property at 1050 and 1040 Dale
Street. We own both lots, with our home located on the southern, 1050 Dale property. The 1040
Dale lot has always been vacant, connects to the 1050 lot, and is used only for gardening and for
our grandchildren's recreation. Our issue is that the proposed assessment is nearly identical (within
$175) on the two lots, while the value of the two is clearly not identical. The 1040 Dale property
has no street frontage, it is located behind (west of) the neighboring lot (1020 Dale), and no part
of the 1040 lot has any connection to the street, so it is not possible to build another home on this
lot.
We also believe that since there is no street frontage and no legal access, the proposed
improvements to Dale Street have no value to this property. We are retired seniors on a fixed
income and have no intention of selling, dividing or making access available to this lot, so no
additional city services will be required.When the time comes that these properties are sold, they
will be sold as one parcel.
We request that the assessment be reevaluated and reduced to only reflect the exposure of
the property to Dale Street. Comparisons to, assessments on other property in the area which also
• have conditions making an entire lot undividable and unbuildable convince us that adjustments
can be made fairly and without breaking precedent. The adjusted front footage process used on
other properties which have more actual front footage than being assessed for should also be
applied in the case here where we have less actual front footage than the proposed assessment.
By applying the logic used to arrive at the adjusted front footage on other properies due to
portions having an "unbuildable' ' status, the lot at 1040 Dale St should also be considered as
unbuildable since there is no access. If the lots were covered under one legal description rather
than individual ones, certainly adjustments to the front footage would be justified, so we believe
that should be the case here.
We feel we are unfairly being asked to pay for 279.6 ft of street frontage, when in fact we
only own 140.5 ft. The additional $17,387.50 is a tremendous amount to pay for improvements
and access to services which this property does not need and will not use, now or in the future,
regardless of who owns it.
Please consider these issues, as the proposed assessments are unacceptable to us.
Sincerely, f
Pearly and Genevieve Christensen
1050 Dale Street
• cc: John P Rodeberg, Gary Plotz
Objections to the high rate of assessments on the East side of .
Pale Street belonging to t-Terlvn & Lucile Danielson.
After the City is taking over an acre -+ for the new road :ent,r-r
Avenue) there is only 4 -5 acras left and that is not enough ;en;
the P117,000 that we are assess the road and storm sewer
We are on a fixed income being over 70 years old. All ur woT-Ing
days we managed to set aside a little savings to take us t ugh r„ r
"golden years." Now those "gold"7ears" are being taken c by the City
Council catering to big developers who have less frontage ut more
acreage, and therefore are not assessed as much as we are. Also because
of the big development Nest of Otter Lake, us small people alon, Dale
Street have to bear the biggest impact of assessments.
You said this assessment couli be deferred for 10 vears. Fine,
except over 10 years these assessments at 10% would grow by another
sizable amount, and on our fixed income, we would never be able to meet
those assessments,
originally, our property on the East side of Dale Street and the,
West side was one - piece of property. Then the road was cut through. Now
we are being penalized by having to pay twice for each side of the road.
C ,
-A
013J CGT o �ssf,�T relc
10dO &Z 51 S w.
":kh"17san . .4w17 55350
9 9,
o % -e uh&&r,5.yrred Aro,oP.�'�� spec, b od "c - 4-h e
u (O po.5cc1 �sse 1 J e
S �enfs ,di �s
' Un 's
Av our p ro perr -
0
P
i
/ � a W OAM
I
The following land owners that are against having a bicvcle
trail on the West side of Pale Street from South /trade Road to
Century Avenue.
2.,8
3 _ .
S.Vr mac.✓
6.
7. +�4
8,
4
10.
Reasons why:
1. A hazzard to Ret onto Dale St, because of Navin¢ to back
out of their driveways.
2. The trail will run awfully close to t homes o n the West
side, therefore taking away any privacv we had.
3. Zee build -up from a different type of traffic.
4. Yes, there is a need for a trail but whether thev cross
Pale St, on the South end or the North end, the car traffic will be
the same. And in the future, if a stop and go light is installed
on the corner of Pale and South Crade Road, then it would be safer to
cross over at that intersection.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 11268
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5029
LETTING NO. 4/PROJECT NOS. 99 -03 & 99 -04
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed
the proposed assessment for improvement of:
Project No. 99-03 Century Avenue SW from Sunset Street SW to Dale Street SW by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain
and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing, traiVsidewalk and appurtenances;
Project No. 99 -04 Dale Street SW from Century Avenue SW Extension to South Grade
Road SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, bituminous
base, bituminous surfacing, trail/sidewalk and appurtenances;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,
Is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period
of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of percent per annum as set down by the
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from November 1, 1999, until the 31st day of December, 2000. To each subsequent
installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if
the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 1999; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of
the next succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall
be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
A
Mayor
City Administrator
/ I
PUBLICATION NO. 6042
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5031
LETTING NO. 7/PROJECT NO. 99 -10
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council will meet at 6:00 P.M. on the 27th day of July,
1999, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at Hutchinson, Minnesota, to pass upon the proposed
assessment for the improvement of Trunk Highway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel
base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances.
You may at anytime prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the
entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City
Administrator. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th,
1999. You may, at anytime thereafter, pay to the City Administrator the entire amount of the
assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such
payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15th or interest will be charged
through December 31 st of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before
the date given above, the rate of interest that will apply is 10 percent (plus or minus) per year. The
right to partially prepay the assessment shall be until November 15, 1999.
The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Administrator's Office.
The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 736,104.12 Written or oral objections
will be considered at the meeting.
No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a signed, written
objection is filed with the City Administrator prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer
at the hearing. The Council may, upon such notice, consider any objection to the amount of a
proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected
property owners as it deems advisable.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will
be followed:
The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by
narratives or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each
witness has tested, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions.
This procedure will be repeated with each witness until neither side has
further questions.
After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses
or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for
questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's
witnesses.
9 - 3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
eI
PUBLICATION NO. 6042
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 6031
LETTING NO. 71 PROJECT NO. 99-10
PAGE_ 2
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, the , ay
be considered and argued to the Council as
to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Cu. al.
5. The entire proceedings will be tape recorded.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may mai 1 final
presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law ;o new
evidence may be presented at this point.
An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant t. oiesota Statutes
Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Admimstrator within 30
days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten
days after service upon the Mayor or City Administrator.
Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, in its discretion,
defer the payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owned by a person 65
years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferent of
the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law,
all amounts accumulated, plus applicable interest, become due. Any assessed property owner
meeting the requirements of the law and the resolution adopted under it, may within 30 days of the
confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk, for the prescribed for for such deferral
of payment of this special assessment on his property.
/Gary D. Plotz/
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON TUESDAY, JULY 13TH, 1999 ANDTUESDAY,-
JULY 20TH, 1999.
nU I L.1111VOy►y cnU11VJ= 11VU/rUbL1L VVUKt%O utrAK I MCnr
Hdchhroon City Center 1 11t Hum Stred SE I Hutchlmon, M1mesob 55350.25221 Phone (612) 234 2091 FAX (612) 23142A0 ;.
REVISED E N G I N E E R I N G=RtPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: July 20, 1999
SUBJECT: letting No. 7/1roject No. 99 -10
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they
be constructed.
Project No. 99 -10: Trunk Highway 15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm
sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base,
concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing and appurtenances.
ESTIMATED COST
99 -10
Construction Cost
$1,250.000.00
Engineering
$195,000.00
Administration
$75,000.00
Fiscal/Legal/Interest
$37,500.00
E T ATED;TOTAL
$1,557.500.00
ESTIMATED FUNDING
99=10
Assessable Cost'
$786,104.12
Deferred Assessable°Cost. _ -
$0.00
City Bonded _ _ _-
$771,395.88
City - Water /Sewer kinds
$0.00
City — TIF
$0.00
MSA
$0.00
Mn/DOT
$0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$1,557,500.00
0 — cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
CJ4
PUBLICATION NO.
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 7
PROJECT NO. 99 -10
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the ancil
Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at, 3 PM
on the 10th day of August, 1999, to consider the making of an improvement of Trunk Iz ;ghway
15 South and Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer am, ervices,
watermain and services, grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic
signals, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed for such improvement is the
benefited property, for which property owners shall receive mailed notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $771,395.88, with an Assessable Cost of
$786,104.12, for the total estimated cost of $1,557,500.00.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard
at this meeting. .
Dated: July 27, 1999
City Administrator
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING,
WHETHER YOU ARE FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR
COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF
OPINION.
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JULY 29TH, 1999.
0
RESOLUTION NO. 11269
REVISED RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 7
PROJECT NO. 99-10
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted January 12th, 1999, the Director
of Engineering has prepared a report with reference to the improvement of Trunk Highway 15 South and
Denver Avenue SW by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services,
grading, gravel base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete islands, traffic signals, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances; and said report was received by the Council on July 27, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HiTCCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and
the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,557,500.00.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 10th day of August,
1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give
mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
_City Administrator
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
TUESDAY, JULY 20, 1999 AND
TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999
1 Col. x 2" Box Ad
(Do not put in Classified Section)
PUBLIC HEARING
July 27,1999 — 6:00 p.m.
at City Center
i Discussion of Cable Franchise Transfer
from Triax to Mediacom
Public Input Welcomed
If there are any questions regarding the ad, contact:
Marilyn J. Swanson
City Center
234 -4202
0
5---C31
BERNICK AND LIFSON
TFD iN WISCON91N
'ir 1LIC ACCOUNTLNT
•1 ) IN FLORIDA
COAL ASSISTANT
M RYN O. MASTERMAN
OF COVN6CL
ICHACL R, BRADLEY
0
n n n —1999
July 2, 1999
Mr. Gary Plotz
Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan St. S. E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Re: Triax/Mediacom Cable Franchise Transfer
Dear Mr. Plow
Under Minnesota law, a franchising authority has thirty (30) days to conduct a hearing after it
notifies the transferee that a public hearing is necessary. On behalf of the franchising authority,
our firm notified Triax that a hearing was necessary on June 17, 1999. While we believe federal
law preempts state law requiring such a hearing, Triax has insisted on a public hearing, Triax
will be required to pay all of your notice and hearing expenses. Therefore, the franchising
authority must schedule a hearing on or before July 17, 1999. When you open the public
hearing, continue it, do not close it, We will continue to review the FCC 394 and make a
recommendation. Once the franchising authority acts on our recommendation, it may close the
hearing.
REMEMBER: OPEN then CONTINUE, DO NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Should you have any questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
BERNICK AND LIFSON, P.A.
/�412?5 >
Michael R. Bradley
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
A
A PROFE35IONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
NCAL J. SHAPIRO
SUITE 1200. THE COLONNADE
SAUL A. YCRNICN'
5500 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
THOMAS D. CREIGHTON
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 66416 -1270
SCOTT A. LIFSON
DAVID N, NIOHTINOALEt
TELEPNONC 16121 6.6 -1300
PAUL J. OUAST
FACSIMILE (613) 5 <6 -1009
R062RT J. V. VOSE
WILLIAM S. RORSECRO
TFD iN WISCON91N
'ir 1LIC ACCOUNTLNT
•1 ) IN FLORIDA
COAL ASSISTANT
M RYN O. MASTERMAN
OF COVN6CL
ICHACL R, BRADLEY
0
n n n —1999
July 2, 1999
Mr. Gary Plotz
Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan St. S. E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Re: Triax/Mediacom Cable Franchise Transfer
Dear Mr. Plow
Under Minnesota law, a franchising authority has thirty (30) days to conduct a hearing after it
notifies the transferee that a public hearing is necessary. On behalf of the franchising authority,
our firm notified Triax that a hearing was necessary on June 17, 1999. While we believe federal
law preempts state law requiring such a hearing, Triax has insisted on a public hearing, Triax
will be required to pay all of your notice and hearing expenses. Therefore, the franchising
authority must schedule a hearing on or before July 17, 1999. When you open the public
hearing, continue it, do not close it, We will continue to review the FCC 394 and make a
recommendation. Once the franchising authority acts on our recommendation, it may close the
hearing.
REMEMBER: OPEN then CONTINUE, DO NOT CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Should you have any questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
BERNICK AND LIFSON, P.A.
/�412?5 >
Michael R. Bradley
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
A
0 BOXED AD — 4" X 5"
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
A.W. DISPOSAL
SANITATION SERVICES
6:00 P.M.
TUESDAY, JULY 27,1999
0
The City Council of the City of Hutchinson
will meet to hold a Board of Review regarding
solid waste services provided by A. W. Disposal
sanitation services. The hearing will take place
at the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street
SE, on Tuesday, July 27, 1999 at 6:00 p.m.
Public input from city residents is invited.
PUBLICATION NO. 6046
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER
TUESDAY, JULY 27, 1999
AND
HUTCHINSON SHOPPER
4 14
•
BOND SALE REPORT
$4,350,000
General Obligation
improvement Bonds, Series 1999
City of Hutchinson, Minnesota
11
July 27, 1999
0 Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
to -�
. -,, 7Y7 J. 1': rIVI II.�N' n'. fit,.
• OVERVIEW
This report describes the proposed plan for the City of Hutchinson to issue
$4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds. Series 1999. This report has
been prepared by Ehlers Sc Associates, in consultation with City Staff and bond
counsel. This report deals with:
• Purpose and components of bond issue.
• Structure.
• Other considerations in issuing bonds.
• Market conditions.
• Issuing process.
PURPOSE
• The $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999 are being
issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 429 and 475, for the purpose of
financing the public improvement projects listed on Exhibit 1.
Financing these projects requires a bond issue in the amount of $4,350,000. The
proposed finance plan consists of the following sources and uses of funds:
Sources
Par Amount of Bonds $4,350,000
Interest Earned 36.836
Total Sources $4,386,836
Uses
Total Project Costs $4,306,636
Discount Allowance 52,200
Capitalized Interest 0
Finance Related Expenses 28.00
Total Uses $4,386,836
0 Page 1
"U . [ ;. YYY ) . .rvi _ '.) � �aNU .
STRUCTURE AND REPAYMENT
', U. DL"uq IB
The Bonds are general obligations of the City of Hutchinson and as such are secured •
by a pledge of the City's full faith, credit, and taxing powers. It is the intent of the
City to use the special assessments levied against the benefitting property owners i
the years 1999 through 2008, at the NIC rate received on the Bonds. The remainirg
balance will be paid by from a tax levy.
The repayment schedule has been structured to fit around the existing tax levies or
debt service. Principal payments maturing in 2001 through 2011 are structurcu to
wrap around outstanding debt and provide the ability to add future debt without
increasing the debt service levy.
The Bonds would be sold August 24, 1999 and be dated September 16, 1999. The
first interest payment on the Bonds will be August 1, 2000, and semiannually
thereafter on February 1 and August 1. Principal on the Bonds will be due on
February 1 in the years 2001 through 2011.
The projected debt service and flow of funds can be found in Exhibit 2.
O THWR CONSIDERATIONS
Following is a summary of key factors in the finance plan: •
• We recommend the following call feature:
Bonds maturing February 1, 2007 and thereafter will be subject to prepayment
at the discretion of the City on February 1, 2006.
We anticipate that the City (in combination with any subordinate taxing
jurisdictions or debt issued in the City's name by 501(c)3 corporations) will not
issue more than a total of $10,000,000 in tax- exempt debt during this calendar
year. This will allow the Bonds to be designated as bank qualod. Bank qualified
status broadens the market and achieves lower interest rates.
Because the City is not issuing more than $5,000,000 in tax- exempt obligations
during calendar year 1999, the debt will qualify for the small issuer exemption
from arbitrage rebate.
The Bonds will be global book cntry. As "paperless" bonds, you will avoid the costs
of bond printing and the need for registrar/paving agent.
Page 2 0
4 V.;zz4
• Moody's Investors Service will be asked to rate this issue. The City currently has
• a 'Baa -1" rating on its outstanding general obligation bonds.
• New regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission on the continuing
disclosure of municipal securities apply to long -term securities with an aggregate
principal amount of $1,000,000 or more.
Because the aggregate amount of this issue is over $1,000,000 and the City has
more than $10,000,000 in total municipal obligations outstanding, you will be
obligated to comply with Full Continuing Disclosure requirements as required by
paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You will be required to
provide certain financial information and operating data relating to the City
annually and to provide notices of the occurrence of certain material events. The
specific nature of the Undertaking, as well as the information to be contained in
the notices of material events will be set forth in the Continuing Disclosure
Covenants that you will enter into at the time of closing for this issue.
You are responsible for reporting any of the material events listed below
and in the Undertaking.
1. Principal and interest payment delinquencies;
• 2. Non - payment related defaults;
3. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial
difficulties;
4. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial
difficulties;
5. Substitution of credit of liquidity providers, or their failure to
perform;
6. Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of
the securities;
7. Modification to rights of holders of the Securities;
8. Securities calls;
9. Defeasances;
10. Release, substitution or sale of property securing repayment of
the Securities;
11. Rating changes;
12. Failure to provide annual financial information as required; and
13. Other material events.
• Page 3
.Ll. IYyr M LdL '�na & AJ�UC.
N0. X2'4
REFUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
We have reviewed all outstanding indebtedness for the City and find that th are •
no immediate refunding opportunities for the City at this time. We will cont a to
monitor the market and the call dates for the City and alert you to any ure
opportunities.
MARRY CONDITIONS
Current interest rates provide an excellent environment for issuing the Bonds. The
Bond Buyer's 20 -Year G.O. Index (BBI) has remained relatively constant since late
August, 1998. Rates in 1998 continued a multi -year downward trend. During the
year, the BBI fell to 4.82%, the lowest point in almost 30 years- In recent weeks, the
BBI has been on a slight upward trend. The BBI currently stands at 5.36%. The
graph on the following page shows the trends for tax - exempt rates in the BBI since
1990.
Page 4 0
Ehlers & Associates. Inc.
•
Bond Buyer's Index
20 -Year G.O. Bonds
�J
8.00%
7.50%
7.00%
6.50%
6.00%
5.50%
5.00 °k
1
4.50%
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999
wd
• 07/22/99
.0 LI - yry D:I i - v ��.,: � r�aaUU. W.,io4 r. 20
ISSUING PROCESS
Following is a tentative schedule for the steps in the issuing process_
July 27, 1999 City Council adopts resolution calling for
sale of the Bonds
Week of August 9, 1999 Submit draft Official Statement and ratis B
materials to Moody's Investors Service for
credit rating
Week of August 9, 1999 Distribute Official Statement
Week of August 16, 1999 Receive credit rating
August 24, 1999 Bond We
September 16, 1999 Bond closing (estimated)
NAM OAWQWUWMOw,\BtSUM1l 999$4600MJCP(G0ImP)W,rnk
Page 6 •
,� [( .:7
'_t52 S �
w. ;Z34 L.
Resolution No.
•
Council Member
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Resolution Providing for the Sale of
$4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1999
r1
\_J
A. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, has heretofore determined that it
is necessary and expedient to issue the City's $4,350,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series
1999 (the "Bonds "), to finance the construction of various improvements in the City; and
B. WHEREAS, the City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc.. in Roseville, Minnesota ( "Ehlers "), as its
independent financial advisor forthe Bonds and is therefore authorized to solicit proposals in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2(9);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE ITRESOLVED by the City Council of City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Authorization: Findin¢s The City Council hereby authorizes Ehlers to solicit proposals for the sale of
the Bonds.
2. Meetine: Proposal QpeninH The City Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Terms
of Proposal for the purpose of considering sealed proposals for, and awarding the sale of the Bonds. The
City Administrator, or designee, shall open proposals at the time and place specified in such Terms of
Proposal.
3. Terms; of Propg4. The terms and conditions of the Bonds and the sale thereof are fully set forth in the
Bond Sale Report and are hereby approved and made a pan hereof.
4. Official Statement In connection with said sale, the officers or employees of the City are hereby
authorized to cooperate with Ehlers and participate in the preparation of an official statement for the
Bonds and to execute and deliver it on behalf of the City upon its completion.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member
and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the
following Council Members voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Dated this _ day of
am
City Administrator
(SEAL)
1J
I . rry L [rry .rl L.nJ d h)au6.
City of Hutchinson, MN
General ObrpabDn Improvement Bonds of 1999
Siang worksheet
South Area Trunk San Sewer
Industrial Park Switery Service
Century AvenueNale Street
Block 50 Alley
TH 15 SouttdDenver & Edmonton Avenues
HasaanJSeichow
Street Overlay Projects
Boulder r Stoney Point
South Lakewood Estates 2nd
Street lights
Project Costs
Less: SewerMlater
Project Costs for Borrowing
Finance Related Expenses
Discount Allowance
Less: Interest Earnings
laaue size
Prepared by Ehlers and Associates
MT-TWOM
2,042,400
248.000
1,558,661
164,035
1,857,360
718.239
129.821
26,767
115,246
60,000
6,920.546
(2.613.910)
4.306,836
28,000
52,200
4.386,836
(38,636)
K350.000
W . ; [ , or C t tsion Only
EXHIBIT 1
786.104
62,933
746,104
337.891
129,821
26,767
115,245
2.204.866
$0.69'/0
New
" $2,400
248,000
30.000
30.000
43,510
2,613,910
07126M •
Prepared by Ehlws and Associates 07/27M
•
For Discu* Only .
City of Hutchinson, NN
(u
General Oblgaflon Improvsrnent Bonds
of 1999
$4,360,000
a
Rau: 5.05%
105%
Total
Total
S2,204AU
NOW
New
Existing
Total
Fiscal
pate
I
R�1
II
Pte, J
i ll
Spec. Aaaess.
22!2!
29M
Q"
-D"
year
09/16/99
1,617,800
1,617,600
1999
08mimo
187,884.38
187,864.38
187,884.38
331,832
0
0
1,541,900
1,541,900
2000
02101;17
200,000
4.35
107,382.50
307,362.50
08101/01
103,012.50
103,012.50
410,375.00
320,696
89,677
94,161
1,418,100
1,572,261
2001
02101!02
175,000
4.40
103,012.50
278,01250
08101102
99,16250
99,162.50
377,175.00
309,563
67,612
70.993
1,339,200
1,410,193
2002
02101;13
225,000
4.50
99,162.50
324,162.50
DBMM
94,100.00
94.100.00
418,262.50
298,428
119,834
125,826
1,233,200
1,359,026
2003
02/01/04
275,000
4.80
94,100.00
369,100.00
OWUN
87,775.00
87,775.00
458,675.00
287,294
169,581
178,060
1,128,100
1,308,160
2004
021oiM
325,000
4.70
87,775.00
412,775.00
OB/0UD5
80,137.50
80,137.50
492,91250
276,159
216,753
227,691
1.28,700
1,257,291
2005
02/01108
300,ODO
4.80
80,137.50
380,137.50
06101/06
72,937.6D
72,937.50
453,075.00
265,025
188,050
197,453
1,020,400
1,217,853
2006
02/01.7
350,000
4.90
72,937.50
422,937.50
08101/07
54,362.50
64,362.50
487,300.00
253,890
233,410
245,080
939,500
1,184,580
2007
02/01/06
550,000
5.00
64,362.50
614,36260
08/01/08
50,612.50
50,812.50
664,975.00
242,756
422,219
443,330
367,000
81D,330
2008
ui
02101M
725,000
5.10
50,612.50
775,612.50
08!01/09
32 ,125.00
32,125.00
507,737.50
231,621
576,116
604,922
166,300
770,222
2009
CE
D21DII10
675,000
5.20
32,125.00
707,125.00
0110111D
14,575.00
14,575.00
721,700.00
143,846
577,752
606,840
154,400
761,040
2010
02/01111
550,000
5.30
14,575.00
564,575.00
0&01!11
0.DO
0.00
564,575.00
564,575
592,604
156,600
749,404
2011
04
7 k 350,000
_
1,8
_ 6.0 W I 88
6 04 2.846.88
-
Assessments in
2010 reflect the ranainog 2000 assessment collection after 2000 debt service has been paid.
Dated:
09110199
Bond Years:
33,558.25
Interest start:
Owim
Average life:
7.71408
Discount
62,200.00
Av"aCoupon:
5.04480%
Not Interest Cost:
5.20038%
Prepared by Ehlws and Associates 07/27M
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
• twin Cities Campus
Minnesota Center for Survey Research
July 14, 1999
Suite 141
2331 University Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN55414 -3067
612- 6274282
RECEIVED
JUL 16 1999
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
Gary Plotz, City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
Hutchinson City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350-2522
Dear Mr. Plotz:
Enclosed are two topies of the University of Minnesota Departmental Services Agreement,
the University's external sales contract which I am required to use.
If the terms of this agreement and the attached Schedule A, concerning the description of
services and compensation, are acceptable to you, please sign on the designated page and
return one copy to me. The second copy is for your files.
Sincerely,
03
• -.
Rossana Armson
Director
Al
• DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AGREE EENT
THIS DEPARTMENTAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (the 'Agreement ") is by and between
the Regents of the University of Minnesota (the 'University") and the City of Hutchinson
(the "Company ").
WHEREAS the University desires to provide services to the Company as set forth herein;
and
WHEREAS the Company desires to retain the University for such services on the terms and
conditions set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the University and Company
agree as follows:
Description of Services. (See Schedule A)
2. Term. July 14 through September 30, 1999.
3. Compensation. (See Schedule A)
4. Independent Contractor. The University's personnel are independent contractors
for, and not employees of, the Company. The Company will not pay or withhold
income taxes or other payroll taxes of any kind on behalf of the University or its
personnel.
Indemnification. The Company agrees to indemnify and hold the University
harmless from all claims, losses, expenses, fees including attorney fees, costs, and
judgments that may be asserted against the University that result from the acts,
omissions, or providing inaccurate information of or by the Company, the Company's
employees, and the Company's agents, including:
5.1 Rendering prompt, complete, accurate information to the University; or
5.2 Advising the University promptly of any changes affecting the University's
ability to perform the services described.
6. Confidentiality. All data and information submitted or made available to the
University by the Company or any other person, unless otherwise publicly available,
and all data and information and other work developed by the University under this
Agreement shall be utilized by the University in connection with this Agreement
only. Except as required by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (Minn.
Stat. 13.01, et seq.), such data shall not be made available by the University to any
• other person without the prior written consent of the Company.
�_(A
7
Publications. The Company recognizes that under University policy the results of
Services must be publishable and agrees that researchers engaged in Services shall be
permitted to present at symposia, or national or regional professional meetings and to
publish in journals, theses, or dissertations, or otherwise of their own choosing,
methods and results of Service, provided, however, that Company shall have been
furnished copies of any proposed publication or presentation at least two (2) months in
advance of the submission of such proposed publication or presentation to a joun ,s,
editor, or other third party. Company shall have one (1) month, after receipt of ;,dd
copies, to object to such proposed presentation or proposed publication either b.:-�use
there is patentable subject matter which needs protection and/or there is Confidrr!ial
Information of Company contained in the proposed publication or presentation. It a the
event that Company makes such objection, the parties shall negotiate an acceptable
version, and the said researcher(s) shall refrain from making such publication or
presentation for a maximum of six (6) months from date of receipt of such objection
in order for Consultant to file patent application(s) with the United States Patent and
Trademark Office and/or foreign patent office(s) directed to the patentable subject
matter contained in the proposed publication or presentation.
8. Intellectual Property. The following provisions shall apply with respect to
copyrightable works, ideas, discoveries, inventions, applications for patents, and
patents, trademarks, trade names, trade secrets, and other intellectual property
(collectively, •Intellectual Property'):
B.I. Title to all Intellectual Property made by an employee or agent of University
resulting from the work performed hereunder shall reside in University;
8.2. Title to all Intellectual Property made by Company resulting from the work
performed hereunder shall reside in Company;
8.3. Title to all Intellectual Property made jointly by University and Company
resulting from the research performed hereunder shall reside jointly in
University and Company. Inventorship and authorship shall be determined in
accordance with U.S. law.
9. Use of Names. The Company shall not state or imply in any publication,
advertisement, or other medium that the test results, or any product or service bearing
any of the Company's names or trademarks and manufactured, sold, or distributed by
the Company, has been approved or endorsed by the University. The Company will
not use the name of the University, nor any of its employees or agents, in any
publicity, advertising, or news release without the prior written approval of the
University.
10. Termination. The Company may terminate this Agreement at any time without
cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the University and upon payment of
amounts owing the University through such termination date. The University may
retain amounts, if any, paid by the Company under this Agreement prior to
termination. The obligations imposed by Sections S and 6 of this Agreement as well
as any licenses granted hereunder shall survive termination under this Agreement.
•
•
•
11. General Provisions.
11.1. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by any party without the
prior written consent of the other.
11.2. Force ANeure. Neither party to this Agreement shall be responsible for any
delays or failure to perform any provision of this Agreement due to acts of
God, strikes or other disturbances, war, insurrection, embargoes,
governmental restrictions, acts of governments or governmental authorities, or
other causes beyond the control of such party.
11.3. Limitation of Liabilities. The University shall not be liable to the Company
for any incidental or consequential damages, regardless of the legal theory
asserted, including negligence and strict liability.
11.4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state
of Mmnesota.
11.5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the
parties and may not be modified except by written agreement of the parties and
supersedes all prior written and/or oral agreements.
11.6. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared void or
• unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed severed from this Agreement,
which shall otherwise remain in full force and effect.
11.7. Notices. Each notice, request, or demand given or required to be given
pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently
given if deposited in the United States mail, first class, postage pre-paid, and
addressed to the address of the intended recipient set forth below or to such
other address as may be specified in writing by the parties.
11.8. Authority. The parties warrant that they have the authority to enter into this
Agreement and that entering into this Agreement is not restricted or prohibited
by any existing agreement to which they are parties.
la�ef�.rr.Z�7�ra 71:i►ii�:��rr � „u.i.i r
Recommended for Approval:
I / \ C Q ✓ �^ ¢ r�
Responsible Faculty Member 1
u�
Office of the General Counsel 2
Approved:
By:
Dated:
Sul': i
B
Name printed/typed
Title
Dated:
1 Signature is required for all Agreements. Department is to forward copy of Agreement less than $50,000 to
the Office of External Sales.
2 This format has been approved by the University's Office of the General Counsel. Office of the General
Counsel approval is required if them am any additions or changes to the standard provisions. Unmodified
standard agreements do not require signature by the Office of General Counsel.
0
0
c 1998 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota. •
Policy and Process Development Office. All Rights Reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity ediaxtor and employer.
Form Updated: Marsh 30, 1999
A- I/HUTCHINSON.DSA
• DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
The Minnesota Center for Survey Research (MCSR) will conduct a Community Needs -
Survey for the City of Hutchinson. Tasks to be performed include sample selection, data
collection, coding and editing, data processing and analysis, and presenting the survey results
to the Hutchinson City Council.
The total cost for these services will not exceed $13,500. You agree to pay half of this
amount to the Minnesota Center for Survey Research when the project is initiated and to pay
-- the balance due when the project is completed. A detailed cost estimate is attached for your
information. If this project is completed for less than the estimated costs, you will only be
billed for the costs incurred.
This cost estimate assumes that the survey will be printed in 12 page small booklet form, that
the City will provide an electronic listing from which a random sample of 800 households
will be selected, that the first mailing and reminder postcard will be sent to the entire
sample, that the third mailing will be sent to 60% of the initial sample, that the City will
provide the printed materials and first class postage (est $1,126), that up to 520 surveys will
be completed and returned, that coding/editing will average 12 minutes for each completed
survey, and that supplies and other expenses will be reimbursed for the actual costs incurred.
If, during the project, these assumptions prove to be substantially in error, it may be
necessary to revise the cost estimate or to revise the delivered product.
The first mailing is scheduled for July 19 and all work will be completed by September 30.
At the completion of the project you will receive the completed survey forms, a brief report
on the numeric results and technical details, and an SPSS Windows data file. In addition, a
presentation of the survey results to the Hutchinson City Council is scheduled for September
14, 1999.
41 -"l 1 .
COMPENSATION
-- - - -- 1999 BILLING RATES
HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY
12 PAGE MAIL SURVEY SENT TO 800 HOUSEHOLDS
DIRECT COSTS (based on approved 1999 Billing Rates)
PERSONNEL (Object 7301)
TOTAL PERSONNEL 12,213
SUPPLIES AND OTHER EXPENSES
Object
Hourly rate
Not. Hours
Total Cost
Executive management
62.00
60
3,720
Project management
43.50
77
3,350
Data processing
34.50
70
2,415
Student workers
14.75
185
2,729
TOTAL PERSONNEL 12,213
SUPPLIES AND OTHER EXPENSES
Object
7310
Printing /duplicating (1 9 env & postcards)
127
Object
7301
Sample
0
Object
7340
Courier
12
Object
7341
Postage (800 postcards and $20 misc)
188
Object
7301
Data entry (subcontracted)
850
Object
7351
Long distance telephone
45
Object
7300
Local travel
65
TOTAL SUPPLIES /OTHER EXPENSES
1,287
TOTAL COSTS
$13,500
A
ASSUMPTIONS: 12 page -mall booklet survey form for mailing
First mailing and postcard reminder sent to entire sample
Third mailing sent to 60% of initial sample
Printed survey forms and cover letters, 0 10 envelopes, first class
postage for lot and 3rd mailings (eat $1,126) provided by client
Up to 520 completed s urveys
12 minutes coding /editing for each completed survey
supplies and other expenses will be reimbursed for actual costs incurred
A- 1 /HUTCHINSON
0 MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir.
RE: Central Garage, growth and changes
DATE: 07/22/1999
CC: JOHNRODEBERG, DIR OF ENGR/PUB WKS, KIN WICIMAMAKI,=ANIC.
CHANGES AND GROWTH IN THE CENTRAL GARAGE
Several factors are leading to tremendous changes and growth in the Central Garage operation.
One is the addition of state and county mechanics to the HATS facility. McLeod County has had
a mechanic at HATS since February 1999. County mechanics vacated their shop in Glencoe
because of air quality issues.
Mn/DOT District 8 has been expanding their regional staff, and will be adding on to HATS.
Mn/DOT expects to add a welder /equipment maintenance position at HATS beginning August 1,
1999 or shortly thereafter.
Hutchinson Utilities and the Central Garage have explored combining their light vehicles for
purposes of contracting oil/frlter/lube services. The City has 37 light vehicles, and Hutchinson
Utilities has 20 light vehicles. By contracting for these services together, we expect the best
possible price from local vendors.
The City Attorney has reviewed the draft agreement for these services. I am anticipating
advertising for quotations this week. We expect there will be about 140 service visits per year
from the combined fleet. We are expecting to contract with two vendors for
oil/filter /lube/inspection services.
ADDITION OF HUTCHINSON UTILITIES FLEET TO CENTRAL GARAGE OPERATION
During discussions about the common service contract, maintenance for the rest of Hutchinson
Utilities' fleet became an issue. Hutchinson Utilities does not employ anyone in a mechanic
position, dedicated to the truck and contractor equipment fleet. Because of the size of their fleet,
this would not be financially feasible. Their fleet is, however, of the size and complexity that
requires significant maintenance each year.
J C
Using current Public Works staffing, adding Hutchinson Utilities fleet to the City's Central •
Garage operations would not be feasible. This is especially true because the Fire Departmet.
vehicles were added in April 1999. Adding the Hutchinson Utilities fleet would require
approximately a %, FTE mechanic position.
Sharing a % FTE position between Central Garage and Public Works department would be
feasible, considering changes in the City that have recently taken place.
There are, however, some changes in the City's operation that would make adding Hutchin
Utilities fleet to the Central Garage operation not only possible, but beneficial.
For winter 1999/2000, there will be several added snow removal routes:
1. Fifth Ave SE (from the new bridge to TH 22)
2. Dale St SW (from Co Rd 7 to South Grade Road)
3. Century Ave SW (west of the fairgrounds)
4. Denver Ave SW (west of TH15)
5. Edmonton Ave SW (west of TH15)
6. Added road, apron, parking lot, and extension of the taxiway at the airport.
7. Street(s) east of California Street NE
8. Extensions of other local streets
Initially I anticipated contracting for snow removal at the airport, which would free up enough
time to cover the new, added routes. I was unable to find a contractor willing to do snow removal
at the airport. Contractors are busy serving their current snow removal customers.
In another development, the seasonal employee who has been providing snow removal services at
the airport will not be available. He has indicated that he will be gone more during the winter
months, and will be unavailable to plow snow.
By eliminating part-time positions, and adding a %: mechanic, 'h operator, we will be able to serve
Hutchinson Utilities fleet and cover every snow removal route, including the new routes, with
full -time employees.
We are anticipating beginning the search process for a mechanic/operator position as soon as
practicable. It is expected that the candidate will have mechanic training or experience, which
would add to the department's flexibility. We currently have employees who could augment the
Central Garage operation, but another employee with those skills would be helpful.
EXPANSION OF HATS FACILITY TO HOUSE MECHANICS
At its last meeting, the HATS Joint Powers Board discussed the future of mechanics at HATS.
The HATS facility was designed for one mechanic, the City's Central Garage mechanic. With all
of the expansion, there could be as many as 4.5 FTE mechanics working out of the HATS facility. ` -
Temporary changes are being made to accommodate the new mechanics.
The HATS Joint Powers Board agreed that a study be done to look at the impact adding this many
mechanic positions will have on the building, and whether remodeling or a building addition
should be planned for the near future.
0
• HATS is a desirable location for mechanic services. It is located the same place as fuel and is an
inter- agency building, which lends itself well to the additional mechanics. Each mechanic brings
particular skills and resources to the job, and by putting the all three mechanic positions in the
same location, the transfer of skills is inevitable.
McLeod County is currently studying their options for a mechanics shop in Glencoe. The County
Engineer is willing to add the HATS facility to that study, while looking at the possibility of a
permanent presence in Hutchinson.
The greatest issue, however, remains that the building was designed for one mechanic, and there
could be as many as 4.5 mechanics working on over 300 vehicles out of the HATS facility. The
HATS Joint Powers Board will be reviewing the findings of the consultant at an upcoming
meeting.
The HATS Joint Powers Board expects to formulate a plan for future mechanic bays soon after _-
reviewing the consultant's study.
0
•
TITLE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC/OPERATOR jobdesc
1999
DEPARTMENT CENTRAL GARAGE /STREETS & MAINTENANCE
• SUPERVISED BY CENTRAL GARAGE MECHANIC; ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUMMARY THIS IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE IN THE CENTRAL DRAFT
GARAGE AND GENERAL MAINTENANCE WORK IN THE STREET 7123199
DEPARTMENT
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.
CENTRAL GARAGE
1 Performs general maintenance on all equipment operated by the City of Hutchinson and Hutchinson Utilities Commission.
a Identifies problems, repairs, and performs preventive maintenance on vehicles and equipment. Advises on repairing,
modifying, or maintenance of vehicles and equipment.
b Makes mechanical repairs on city vehicles and equipment by maintaining, repairing, adjusting, and/or replacing: air
conditioning and heating system components, electrical system components, fuel system components, hydraulic
system components, transmissi system components, mechanical system components, diesel, gas, and small engines
and other power producing components, body panels, windshields, mirrors, and other body appurtenances, mechanical
equi pment (e.g., bearings, shaft sleeves, gears, impellers).
c Makes appropriate equipment modifications; rebuilds or builds equipment from scratch. Reads blue prints and
fabricates items as necessary.
d Orders and installs repair parts.
2 Updates maintenance schedules, prepares inspection forms and various reports, as necessary. Maintains and uses library
of equipment information and manuals.
3 Operates, inspects and maintains the fuel, oil and lubricants delivery system, shop equipment and tools including, cutting
torches, welders, soldering irons, and other related equipment
4 Performs metal work and welds metals.
• STREET MAINTENANCE
1 Responsible for snow removal and mowing at the City Municipal Airport Operates appropriate equipment
2 Operates any or all equipment used in maintenance on municipal infrastructure. Equipment includes: Tractor, motor
grader, trucks, wheel loader, sweeper, snowplow truck, backhoe, skidsteer loader, and other light vehicles and power tools.
3 Performs routine servicing and care of equipment or supplies.
GENERAL
1 Assists other department as directed. Assists others by teaching them proper and safe use of vehicles and equipment
2 Performs related duties as assigned or apparent
3 Follows all safety rules, department policies, and other related regulations.
IP ul W
All equipment and supplies of the street department and all machinery and equipment used by the City of Hutchinson and the
Hutchinson Utilities Commission. Commmications equipment.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Training and substantial experience in the mechanical maintenance of a variety of construction equipment and heavy trucks.
Training and experience operating trucks and construction equipment Ability to communicate well verbally, and in writing.
Physical strength and stamina. Willingness to accept a variety of duties. Ability to work well with fellow employees,
customer departments, and the public.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
Commercial drivers license (CDL) class B w/ tanker and hazardous waste endorsements.
j • WORKING CONDITIONS
Inside and outside work in all weather. Scheduled and unscheduled hours related to maintenance as required by supervisors or
as dictated by weather conditions. Scheduled for on-call hours during winter months.
STARTING RATE: S 12.48 / hour �— c ,
0
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
CC:
Date: July 23, 1999
Re: REFUSE CONTRACT EXTENSION WITH A.W. DISPOSAL
I have met with Tom Worlunan of A. W. Disposal, and their firm is willing to
extend the refuse contract through October 1, 2000 with the same contract
conditions/price.
Tlu4 ension will give us additional time to implement the composting project and
c4ushUotion that has a "tentative start -up date" of October 1, 2000.
• The lard of Review at the Council meeting tonight is pursuant to the contract to
heat`,a1Xy complaints on the service, if any. Tom Workman will be in attendance at
fhe Gotincil meeting.
1
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Mary Haugen — P.R.C.E. Operations Manager
Date: July 21, 1999
Re: Mighty Ducks Grant Agreement
The construction of the addition to the Civic Arena is proceeding on schedule. The
cooperation and communication among the Hockey Association Building
Committee, the general contractor and city staff has been very good, which has
enhanced the decision-making process and has kept the project on track.
We received word from the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission that we are to
"ve-an additional $66,500 "Mighty Ducks" grant. This is in addition to the
$125,000 award. Together, these two grants total $191,500 - still $58,500
'h f# bie possible total of $250,000 that our grant proposal made us eligible for.
**I[ receive funding in 1999 for this amount, but it is more likely that we
u
0AM &ce to conti ive it in year 2000, if the state legislature votes n e the "Mighty
......................
..................... P gram.
ity Council action is required for us to receive the additional $66,500 grant. The
id4ched resolution authorizes execution of the grant agreement and certifies
incumbancy. We ask that you pass this resolution so that we can execute the grant
agreement with the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission.
J 11 "
,e7.
RESOLUTION #11261 0
CERTIFICATE OF
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
and
CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBANCY
Be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson enter an agreement with the State of
Minnesota, for the Hutchinson Civic Arena Expansion Project, to be conducted
during the period from November 1, 1998 through November 1, 1999.
Marlin Torgerson is hereby authorized to sign and execute such agreements as are
necessary to implement the project on behalf of the Grantee.
I certify that the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of
Hutchinson on July 27, 1999. I further certify that Marlin Torgerson is the present
Mayor of the -City of Hutchinson and that the following is a specimen-of his or_her •
signature.
SIGNED: WITNESSED:
(Signature Representing
Executive Body)
(Title)
- (Date)
(Signature)
(Title)
(Date)
11
�-F' -
• THIS grant contract, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State of Minnesota,
acting through its Amateur Sports Commission (hereinafter STATE) and the City of Hutchinson
(hereinafter GRANTEE), witnesseth that:
WHEREAS, the STATE, p ursuan t to Minnesota Statutes Section 240A.09 and 1997 Minn. Laws ch.
202, art. 1, sec. 26 is empowered to promote the development of proposals and award grants for new
statewide public ice facilities and for renovation of existing ice arenas; and
WHEREAS, on or about March 10, 1997, the STATE issued a Request for Proposals ( "RFP')
seeking proposals from eligible GRANTEES interested in building or renovating public ice arenas;
and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE's proposal was among those selected to receive grant funds to finance the
construction or renovation of an ice arena; and
WHEREAS, GRANTEE represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set
0 forth herein,
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed:
I. GRANTEE'S DUTIES GRANTEE shall construct a new public ice arena or
renovate an existing public ice arena in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications set
forth in the STATE's RFP and GRANTEE's proposal, which shall be read together, attached hereto
and incorporated by referenced as Exhibit A.
;_4M• a & we) ; r Xj Uhl
A. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursements
to GRANTEE's shall be and shall not exceed sixty six thousand five hundred dollars ($66,500).
B. Terms of Payment Payment shall be made by the STATE promptly after
GRANTEE's presentation of evidence documenting that at least twenty-five percent (25 %) of the
construction or renovation of the public ice arena has been completed and paid for with funds other .
than this grant award. Such evidence shall be submitted in a manner prescribed by the STATE, and
shall constitute compliance with the match requirement set forth under Minn. Stat. 240A.09(b).
III. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT All services provided by GRANTEE pursuant to
this grant contract shall be performed to the satisfaction of the STATE, as determined at the sole
discretion of its authorized representative, and in accord with all applicable federal, state, and local
laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. GRANTEE shall not receive payment for work found by
the STATE to be unsatisfactory, or performed in violation of federal, state or local laws, ordinances,
�;' E
rules or regulations.
IV. TERMS OF CONTRACT This grant contract shall be effective on Ju- :8, 1999
or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, p ursuan t to .inn. Star
16B.06, subd. 2, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until June 30, 2000. : until all
obligations set forth in this grant contract have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever :urs first
V. CANCELLATION Prior to disbursements of funds, this grant cori: Xt may be
canceled by the STATE or GRANTEE at any time, with or without cause, upon th. -. ( 30) days
written notice to the other party. If the STATE finds that there has been a failure to ct..iply withthe
provisions of this agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made, or that t purposes for
which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled, the STATE m: take action to
protect its interests, including requiring the return of all or part of the funds already: disbursed.
VI. STATE'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE The STATE's authorized
representative for the purpose of administration of this grant contract is Paul Erickson or his
successor in office. The GRANTEE's authorized representative for purposes of administration of
this grant contract is . The GRANTEE's authorized
representative shall have full authority to represent GRANTEE in its fulfillment of the terms,
conditions and requirements of this grant contract.
VII. ASSIGNMENT GRANTEE shall neither assign no transfer any rights or obligations
under this grant contract without the prior written consent of the STATE.
VIII. AMENDMENTS Any amendments to this grant contract shall be in writing, and
shall be executed by the same parties who executed the original grant contract, or their successors
in office.
IX. LIABILITY GRANTEE agrees to indemnify and save and hold the STATE, its
representatives and employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action, including. all
attorney's fees incurred by the STATE, arising from the performance of this grant contract by
GRANTEE or GRANTEE's agents or employees. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal -
remedies GRANTEE may have for the STATE's failure to fulfill its obligations p ursua nt to this
gran[ contract.
X. STATE AUDITS The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and
- practices of the GRANTEE relevant to this grant contract shall be subject to examination by the
STATE and the Legislative Auditor.
M. DATA PRACTICES ACT The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the Minnesota
Data Practices Act as it applies to all data provided by the STATE in accordance with this grant
contract and as it applies to all data created, gathered, generated or acquired in accordance with this
grant contract.
XII. PUBLICITY Any publicity given to the program, publications, or services provided
resulting from this grant contract, including, but not limited to, notices, informational pamphlets,
press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the GRANTEE
or its employees individually or jointly with others, or any subgrantees shall identify the STATE as
a sponsoring agency and shall not be released without prior approval by the STATE's authorized
representative.
XM. ANTITRUST GRANTEE hereby assigns to the State of Minnesota any and all
claims for overcharges as to goods and/or services provided in connection with this contract resulting
from antitrust violations which arise under the antitrust laws of the United States and the antitrust
laws of the State of Minnesota
XIV. PREVAILING WAGE GRANTEE hereby acknowledges that acceptance of this
grant expressly subjects its construction or renovation or prevailing wage rate statutes (Minn. Stat.
177.41, et seq.).
XV. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This grant contract, and amendments and
supplements hereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. Venue for all legal
proceedings arising out of this grant contract, or breach thereof, shall be in the state or federal court
with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota
XVI. GRANTEE SIGNATURES GRANTEE certifies that authorized person(s) have
executed the grant contract on behalf of the GRANTEE as required by applicable articles, by -laws
or resolutions.
XVII. OTHER PROVISIONS (Attach additional pages as necessary.)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this grant contract to be duly executed.
APPROVED:
1. GRANTEE: 2. STATE AGENCY:
0
Title
Date
LM
Date
As to form and execution
3. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Title
M
L1
•
10 ONOHUE
July 23, 1999
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
Hutchinson City Center
I I I Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Re: I,euer of Recommendation
Biosolids Drying Facilities
Equipment Procurement and Installation
Donohue Pmject No. 101 17
Dear Mr. Plotz:
.1 :,1 I C)I.:II IG'q UR IWIM
,, FLU! h'f,AN, ,Y ],1181
1111N:; 1 121I J0Ab1+M,
IAx 1 04 1118- II411/
Pursuant to the Official Notice to Bidders, sealed bids for the above referenced project were received in
the City Council Chamber on July 10, 1999 at 1:00 pm. and publicly opened and reed aloud. We have
reviewed the Bid received for the Equipment.
�— One sealed bid was received. The bid was submitted by McCormick Construction Company
of Rockford, Minnesota in the amount of 51,302,700. The budgetary allocation for the equipment was
SI.214,200. The bid was 7.3% above this allocation.
It is our opinion that the Bidder, McCormick Construction Company, submitted a responsive bid and is
qualified and capable of performing the Work as specified. It is therefore recommended that the Conttaa
be awarded to McCormick Construction Company, in the amount of SI,302,700_
We respectfully present these recommendations for City review and consideration Award of contract
should be made by Resolution followed by official notification to the successful bidder. It is good practice
to send the Notice of Award by certified mail or other delivery service that can verify that the document
has been delivered.
We will be pleased to answer any questions concerning the recommendations set forth herein.
Sincerely,
t �•�-J S. ltn„�
Edward S. Nevers
Professional Engineer
r
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
._______,__.�
To: City Council
From: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning /Zoning /Building
Date: July 22, 1999 — Meeting Date July 27, 1999
Re: Bill Mathew's Accessory Building at 5461550 Miller Avenue
There have been numerous complaints received about the above - identified building. A
petition was submitted by some of the residents in the neighborhood. The Planning
Commission discussed this issue at their July 21, 1999 meeting and requested staff
report the concerns of the neighbors.
The petition outlines 5 areas of concern: height of the building and overhead doors;
"pole barn" type appearance; height, building size and framing is not customary for
residential areas; safety concerns based on potential use of the property; and adverse
affect on property values. Staff has provided additional information regarding the
concerns.
• Height and Doors
The height of the building was measured and was found to be exceeding the
maximum height restriction of 16 feet. Definition of Height of Building: The
vertical distance measured from the sidewalk level, or its equivalent ground
surface .... to the mean height level (between eaves and ridge) for gable or hip
roofs. A "stop -work" order was issued to determine the solution to the height
problem. The applicant agreed to cut down the height of the building to not
exceed 16 feet. The "stop- work" order was lifted after the Planning Commission
meeting, under advisement from the City Attorney. The City has no regulations
concerning garage door height. Below is a diagram of the building height:
Accessory Building Issue
546/550 Miller Avenue — Bill Mathews
Page 2
Appearance Of A "Pole Barn" Type Building
The City Code defines a Pole Barn as: a building with a frame made of r. ood or
metal parts, with metal panels covering three or more sides and without' a full
foundation. This building contains a full foundation; therefore is not d+ ? :ned as a
pole bam, regardless of its exterior materials. The property owner stated he will
be using metal siding and metal roofing materials. The property owne also
explained that there would be a different color border around the bor n of the
building. Horizontal siding would require some reconstruction and athing to
be added to the building.
Building not Customary in Residential Areas
- The property owner applied for a conditional use permit for t vi reasons: the
property does not contain a principal structure and the building exceeded 1,000
square feet. The building is 32 feet by 40 feet (1,260 square feet). The
Conditional Use Permit was reviewed with a public hearing at the Planning
Commission on May 18, 1999. No public comment was received at the hearing
or in writing. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The City
Council reviewed the information and approved the conditional use on May 25,
1999. The Conditional Use Permit criteria were considered in the decision-
making. A building permit was approved June 18, 1999.
Safety Concerns with Potential Use of the Building
The petition states that there would be construction equipment housed on the
property. The property owner stated, at the Planning Commission meeting, the
he may occasionally use a trailer, which would be stored in the building. The
property owner stated the building is to be used for personal items. If problems
occur when the building is in use, enforcement procedures can be used to halt
violations.
Property Value Concern
Section 6.0 (B, 2, a), specifically considers adverse effects on adjacent property,
prior to issuance of a conditional use permit. This was considered during review
of the permit.
Cc: Bill Mathews, property owner
0
\�
�
Y^
-_-- ''-'-------'-_��---_�___----------
�
` �
w t lle.r Ave.
N
T
•
Q�
0
g- c-
Nermiumim,1601t.t. W 10 •
The homeowners surrounding the property of William Mathews, 550 Miller Ave. SW, originally
received notification of a request for a building permit to build a garage on the indicated
property. Upon notification, Bruce Briggs, 540 Miller Ave. SW, inquired with city hall about
the specifications of the proposed garage. He expressed concern, that due to the size, the garage
may not be intended for residential purposes but rather for commercial purposes since Mr.
Mathews owns a construction business. Julie at city hall informed him that the building permit
request was for a residential garagi. She also assured him that *s was a conditional use permit
and the structure could not be nsed to house construction 4quipment. Mr. Briggs inquired about
the construction material and was told that this information had not been requested or disclosed
but it was believed that customary'residential construction materials would be used. Based on
this information, the homeowners surrounding the property had no objection to the issuance of
the permit to construct a customary residential garage.
Based on completion of preliminary construction, the homeowners surrounding the site would
like to express renewed concerns as follows:
The height of the building and overhead doors are not consistent with a residential
garage.
. The framing of the structure suggests that use of vertical siding consistent with that used
in the construction of an industrial "pole barn" will be used on the surface.
The height, building size and framing is not customary construction for a residential
neighborhood:.
Since the structure suggests industrial use, there are safety concerns to the residents Df
the surrounding properties, especially to children who reside in the area. If construction
equipment is housed on the property, this will heighten safety concerns since entrance
would occur through an alley access which runs parallel to residential play areas.
Since the structure is not customary for a residential neighborhood, the existence of the
structure as it is curre4tly constructed would have an adverse affect on neighboring
property values.
The homeowners surrounding 550 Miller Ave. SW have no objection to the construction of a
standard residential garage which conforms with the othef structures in the neighborhood n�/
Signature 1- 9)4- d� e M�lG Signatur
Address $yo Poe v 1 Address 2
0-
-61�
F I M MMYroll iTXv =#o ,1 1 col I 1 I' � .
• .. - � �r 77a►i
Si g n atur e / AM y
A ddress
VIM ,
� Jj,
Address
i
Si gnature�
Signature
Address ,
Signature
A .
Si gnatu r e
��.� ♦ �I
A d ♦ •
-
Si gnat ure /.. .
Address
Signature
Address
Signature
Signature
/
Signature k
Address S 3S -e+,) v 2�
Signature / 0" /� / (/ r m i 4 Z
Address -z 7 / Z 1, ., r7 fe r4
Signature
Ir!
Signature
Address
Signature
Address
Signature
Address
Signature
Address
Signatur#
Address
Signature
Address
Signature
Address
! Signatur e _ Q , � .� Signature
7�ddress 3 '�? L,' a., 4ize . Address_
W Lill a�1 4.dlt. -
i/
0 9
0
COMPILED BY: C. RICE
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032
LETTING NO. 14/PROJECT NO. 99-35
CENTURY 7 CINEMA
STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN
k APPURTENANCES
07/27/99
ADOPTED
COMPUTED BY: C. RICE
1999
BOND FUND
CHECKED BY: J. RODEBERG
INTEREST RATE
1ST HRG WAIVED
10
NUMBER OF YEARS
2ND HRG WAIVED
$19,659.10
COST PER UNIT
ACCOUNT
NO.
CITY PID NO.
NAME k ADDRESS
OF PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
UNIT
ASSESSMENT
CREDIT
DEFERRED
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL. ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NO.
01
12- 116 -30- 07-0010
Cinema I LLP
5425 84th Ave N
Wen 1/2 of Lot I, Block 1,
23.319.0010
Brooklyn Puk MN 55443
Fair Grounds Addition
1.00
$19,659.10
$0.00
$0.00
$19,659.10
TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032 $19,659.10
1 l
ARA PAGE 10 1
RESOLUTION NO. 11270
RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032
LETTING NO. 14 /PROJECT NO. 99 -35
WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of West ! f2 of Lot 1, Block 1,
Fair Grounds Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer sear r:es and watermain
services and appurtenances and appurtenances, and the bid price for s�;ch improvement is
$15,589.49 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making rf such improvement
amount to $4,069.64 so that total cost of the improvement will be $19.659.10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be
$0.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to
be $19,659.10.
2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2000 and
shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the
adoption of the assessment resolution.
3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith
calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every
assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation,
as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public
inspection.
4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the
Council thereof.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
r1
RESOLUTION NO. 11271
RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032
LETTING NO. 14 /PROJECT NO. 99 -35
WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 27th day of July, 1999, the Director
of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving West 1/2
of Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds Addition by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer services
and watermain services and appurtenances and appurtenances.
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed
assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The owner /owners of the affected properties have waived hearing on said proposed
assessment.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged
if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 1999. He may at any time thereafter, pay to
the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued
to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before
November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
0 Y,
RESOLUTION NO. 11272
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5032
LETTING NO. 14/PROJECT NO. 99-35
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met ano awed
the proposed assessment for improvement of West 1/2 of Lot 1, Block 1, Fair Grounds A:'.' .on by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer services and waterrnain services and appu` - anoes
and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TF 4TY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made; ' L)art hereof,
is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands r,r_,-ned therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period
of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in
January, 2000, and shall bear interest at the rate of pe rcent per annum as set down by the
adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest o n the entire
assessment from November 1, 1999, until the 31 st day of December, 2000. To each subsequent
installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest
accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if
the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 1999; and he may, at any time
thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with
interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such
payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of
the next succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the
County Auditqr to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall
be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
0
10
0
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
[ -9
Data: July 23, 1999
Re: MCLEOD COUNTY STEERING COMMITTEE FOR CENSUS 2000
Bonnie Baumetz has been coordinating the census updates for the City of
Hutchinson.
meeting took place with Tammy Kassler, a census "partnership specialist," to
dig forming a multi - jurisdictional steering committee called a "Complete count
Co ee."
urreYttl} the ad -hoc committee consists of Nan Crary and Tersa (County), Mark
Laitft (Glencoe), Bonnie Baumetz and Gary Plotz (Hutchinson).
It is recommended the City of Hutchinson adopt the attached proclamation that
Glencoe and the County also intend to adopt
We will immediately start activities that will focus on the census, and perhaps one of
the first will be to have a booth at the County Fair. It is estimated that for every
person counted in a local community, it has a value of $2,500 /person over a 10 -year
period. This would be in the form of local, state and federal aids/grants.
/mjs
Attachment
1
Census 2000 Proclamation
City of Hutchinson
(city, Town, County, State, etc.) (Name of Government Entity)
WHEREAS, the 2000 Census will determine apportionment of seats in the United States House of
Representatives, state legislatures and local governments, and Is the basis for the allocation of billions of
dollars of Federal funding: and,
WHEREAS. Census information is confidential and protected by law, prohibiting any pubric or private
agency from gaining access to confidential Census data; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is committed to a full and accurate Census
count and is placing special emphasis on enumerating members of traditionally undercounted
population groups: and,
WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson has agreed to be one of the 39,000
governmental entities in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau; and.
WHEREAS, the City o f Hutchinson shall form a Complete Count Committee
consisting of members from the local government, business, religious, civic, and media communities; and.
THEREFORE,I Marlin - Torgerson Mayor of the City of
Hutchins— _ hereby proclaim Census 2000 as a top priority for all elected and
appointed officials, and encourage the community to place an emphasis on partnering with the U.S.
Census Bureau in achieving and accurate and complete count in Census 2000.
Signed this 27th day of July . 199
Marlin Torgerson, Mayor
ATTEST: SEAL
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
— T
Hutchinson City Center
•
111 Hassan street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
320 - 587- 5151/F" 320 - 2344240
O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
RE: Consideration of Revised "Trunk Access Charge Rates"
DATE: July 22, 1999
We have had issues arise regarding the fairness of charging full Sanitary Sewer and Watetmain
Trunk charges for Nursing Home /Assisted living facilities. We agree that our current policy does
not take into account these types of projects and would potentially be charging these properties the
same rate as apartments that can utilize significantly more capacity of the system.
We reviewed the rates and information received from Welcome To Our Home and other sources and
propose to create a new, lower rate for Nursing Home /Assisted Living units. Our basis for this
• revision:
• Nursing Home/Assisted Living units generally have only 1 person per unit vs. about 2 people
in an average apartment
• People in Nursing Home /Assisted Living units generally use less water per person than
apartments. An average person uses 80 to 100 gallons per day, while information indicates that
people in Nursing Home /Assisted Living units use 20 to 40 gallons per day
• Many Nursing Home /Assisted Living units do not have full bathrooms with showers/tubs or
kitchens
We have therefore proposed a revised and reduced rate that reflects the average usage of the system
in comparison to regular apartment and house usage. We have also revised the wording of the policy
to clarify how the rates are calculated and collected.
We recommend approval of the revised Policy regarding Trunk Access Rate Charges.
cc: Gary Plotz— City Administrator
Julie Wischnack — Director of Planning
Mark Hensen— Building Official
file: Assessments
0
Printed on recycled paper - q- A.
M E M
1999 TRUNK ACCESS CHARGE `TES
CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNES
SANITARY
LOT TYPE SEWER W: ERMAIN
RESIDENTIAL (Low to Mid- Density/R -1 R - 2, R - 3)
0 to' /z acre $ 550 /unit u- 25 /unit
'/z to 3/4 acre $ 600 /unit 375 /unit
3/4 to 1 acre $ 680 /unit 440 /unit
Over 1 acre $1,100 /acre 600 /acre
HIGH = DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (114, R -5)
All parcels ((except as applies below) $ 475/un' � 275 /unit
Nursing Home /Assisted Living' $ 225/ur. $ 130 /unit
COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL
Negotiated' $ 1,700 /acre $ 1,200 /acre
1 Must meet standards in policy and receive approval of Planning Staff
Z Varies due to diversity in utility use. Rate shall be no lower than those noted under
"Residential -Over 1 acre".
Trunk Storm Sewer Rates will be determined per project. A base rate of $0.05 /SF, or
$2,200 /acre will be assumed for all low -to -mid density residential development, although the
actual rate will be based on the actual costs needed to provide service to the property. High
density residential, commercial and industrial rates may be higher. Credit will be given to
properties providing trunk storm water improvements as part of privately funded improvements
for oversized storm sewer, and quality or quantity ponding.
Rates apply to all properties, unless previously assessed for trunk services. All
funds collected will be utilized to pay off trunk sanitary sewer, watermain and
storm sewer costs incurred by the City. The City shall collect the fee(s) with
the building permit, unless otherwise approved.
NOTE: 1999 Sanitary Sewer Rates baud on incrmu of appiournmely 5% from 1999 based on ENR Co "ion cost ratio and Consultant Review. Water mm
increased 10°/ due to information derircd from Water Rata Cost of Service Study preparation.
Appro.ed By Ciry C.0 don July 7 - , /999' HA4rsesalthmk99 •
q — A 1,
V 9 TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES
f I T Y OF HUTCHINSO.l; MINNESOTA
•
CUrdeE�uT
RESIDENTIAL (Low to Mid- Density/R -1, R -2, R -3)
0 to 1 /2 acre
$ 550 /unit
$
325 /unit
'/2 to 3/4 acre
$ 600 /unit
$
375 /unit
3/4 to 1 acre
$ 680 /unit
$
440 /unit
Over 1 acre
$1,100 /acre
$
600 /acre
HIGH - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R -4, R -5)
All parcels
$ 475 /unit
$
275 /unit
COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
Negotiated*
$ 1,700 /acre
S
1,200 /acre
* Varies due to diversity in utility use. Rate shall be no lower than those noted under
"Residential -Over 1 acre".
Trunk Storm Sewer Rates will be determined per project. A base rate of $0.05 /SF, or
$2,200 /acre will be assumed for all low -to -mid density residential development. High density
residential, commercial and industrial rates may be higher.
Rates apply to all properties not previously assessed for trunk services provided All funds
collected will be utilized to pay off trunk sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer costs
incurred by the City. Connection fees will be added to Assessment Rolls when done in
conjunction with improvement projects. The City shall have the option to collect the fee with
the building permit in other areas.
NOTE: 1999 Sanitary Sewer Retei based on increase of approximately i% from 1998 based on ENR Consuucuon cost ratio and Consultant Review. Water rates
inaeaxd 10%d. to information derived from Wata Rate/Cost of Service Study preparation.
0 kMsiwr fate *February 1 1999 * N: LLSS'ESSITRUNK98.RAT
� _/ .
U II U411 JJ4 14: tl1
on l24J24Jb
WELCal- TO OUR HOME
Srwi/r H//Fiwp D//tI•)wrwe LY.
July 22, 1999
Mr. John P. Rodeberg
Director of Engineering. City of Hutchinsoe
111 Hum St SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Delivered via fax: 320 - 234 -4240
Dear Mr. Rodebexg;
PAGE 01
As you requested, I researched our records over the past four months for our .. c dMge
at Ridgeway on German in New Ulm. As we suspected, there is a very strops' correlation
between ntmlbet of clients living in the btdld'ssg and water usage and the usage rate is
considerable lower than in a typical home.
Mouth # of Meter # 1 Meter # 2 Total Avg
Match
30
300
300
600
20
April
35
300
500
800
22.85
May
40
400
400
800
20
June
45
400
500
900
20
i also asked the average usage for a typical home wad they indicted it was approximately
70 to 80, spin depending on the number of people living in a home. Our mix is 90%
single perinea and IM /a couples. There ate so extra persons permitted to live in our units
longer then seven days in a year to accommodate the occasional visitor or someone who
wishes to My with a friend who is ill.
The number quoted above includes the kitchen usage, but does not include the lawn
sprinkler. We do not have adcelCrase number of reliable numbers on lawn sprinkling to
detumm a trap&
It would appear that an assisted living facility would use somewhere in the 30% arcs of a
typical home. I would suggest then a WAC and SAC of some similar relationship.
Thank you for your eoosWlecn ion If you regim any additional information, please let
me know.
S�in
Dean R. Bloemke
swrreas
. a
CO. Box 403 - Redwood Falls, MN 56283 • Phone: 50 -3235 - 1 SO- : (') : , :(
is
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT (100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS)
•
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 99-36
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dated: July 27, 1999
•
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
We, all owners of real property known and described as Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for
improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows by construction
of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous
base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and that the
City assess the entire cost of the improvement against our property described below, and we hereby agreed to
pay the entire cost as apportioned by the City.
This petition shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the
parties.
OWNERS SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
SORENSEN & NAUSTDAL PROPERTIES, LLC
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4;
Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7;
Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and
1352 Heritage Ave NW Outiots A & B,
1) Hutchinson MN 55350 Rolling Meadows Addition
Bruce Naustdal, Partner
1352 Heritage Ave NW
2) Hutchinson MN 55350
Denise Naustdal, Partner
3)
15589 620th Ave
Litchfield MN 55355
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4;
Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7;
Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and
Outlots A & B,
Rolling Meadows Addition
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4;
Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6; Lot 1, Block 7;
Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and
Outlots A & B,
Rolling Meadows Addition
Kon Sorensen, Partner
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 4;
Lots 1, Block 5; Lot 1, Block 6, Lot 1, Block 7;
Lot 1, Block 8; Lots 1 & 2, Block 9; and
15589 620th Ave Outlots A & B.
4) Litchfield MN 55355 Rolling Meadows Addition
Diane Sorensen, Partner
Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of
property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for.
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
9 -4
AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT, WAIVER OF HEARING AND •
WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 99-38
This Agreement, is made this 27th day of July, 1999, between the City of Hutchinson.: ate of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and Sorensen & Naustdal Properties, LLC, Bruce -
and Denise Naustdal, Partners, of McLeod County, State of Minnesota, and Kon Sorensen ano Diane
Sorensen, Partners, of Meeker County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as Owner.
In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owners' request, to cause :, improvement
of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW In Rolling Meadows Addition !% construction of
storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter,
bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances; and to assess 100% of the cost to the
Owner. Owner agrees to pay said costs of said improvement not to exceed 9 660,000.00. plus interest,
over a period ten (10) years. Owner expressly waives hearing and objection to any irregularity with regard
to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owners
property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts.
This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and
successors of the parties.
In testimony, whereof, said Owner has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first above written.
OWNERS SIGNATURE:
IN PRESENCE OF:
SORENSEN & NAUSTDAL PROPERTIES, LLC
1)
Bruce Naustdal, Partner
2)
Denise Naustdal, Partner
3)
Kon Sorensen, Partner
4)
Sorensen, Partner
Date: July 27, 1999
RESOLUTION NO. I' a' 4
RESOLUTION DECLARING ADEQUACY OF PETITION
AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 99-38
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
A certain petition requesting the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and
Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel
base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances,
filed with the council on July 27th, 1999, is hereby declared to be signed by the required
percentage of owners of property affected thereby. This declaration is made in
conformity to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.035.
2. The petition is hereby referred to the Director of Engineering and that person is instructed
to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way
as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost- effective, and feasible and
as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other
improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended.
Adopted by the council this 27th day of July, 1999.
City Administrator
Mayor
49
1 111 Hassan SU W SE 1 Hutchlneon WnneeWS 5L1W25Z21 Phone (612)23442661 FAX (614) 234.4M
E NGINEERINGW
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: July 27th, 1999
SUBJECT: Letting No. 16/Project No. 99 -38
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend they
be constructed.
Project No. 99 -38: 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition
hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing, trail and appurtenances
ESTIMATED FUNDH*M
9434
Assessable Cost
$426,000.00
Deferred Assessable Cost (30% of Assessable)„
$180,000.00
City Bonded (Storm Water)
$30,000.00
City - Water/Sewer Funds
$0.00
City — TIF
$0.00
MSA
$0.00
Mn/DOT
$0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$636,000.00
is
cc: Cal Rice - Engineering Department
RESOLUTION NO. 1 7
• RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT
AND WAIVING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO.16
PROJECT NO. 99 -38
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted July 27th, 1999, a report has
been prepared by the Director of Engineering, with reference to the improvement of 7th Avenue
NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for
improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services,
gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances; and
said report was received by the Council on July 27th, 1999,
WHEREAS, this improvement was petitioned for by 100% of the property owners and said
property owners have waived hearing on said improvement,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the
reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement
• pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of
$636,000.00.
2. The public hearing on said improvement is hereby waived.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
is
RESOLUTION NO.11 2 76 •
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 99 -38
WHEREAS, a certain petition requesting the improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue
NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows Addition hereby petition for improvement by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb
and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing , trail and appurtenances, was duly presented
to the council on the 13th day of April, 1999; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the council adopted July 27th, 1999, a report has been
prepared by the Director of Engineering with reference to the improvement, and this report was
received by the council on July 27th, 1999.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. The council finds and determines that said petition was signed by all owners of real
property abutting upon the street(s) names as the location of the improvement.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted July •
27th, 1999
3. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall
prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
• RESOLUTION NO. /I �277
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 16
PROJECT NO. 99 -38
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of 7th Avenue NW, 8th Avenue NW, and Shiloh Street NW in Rolling Meadows
Addition hereby petition for improvement by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and
services, watermain and services, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing , trail and appurtenances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be publicly opened at 2:00 pm on
• Monday, August 23rd, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the
City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering, will then be tabulated, and will be considered
by the Council on August 24th, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center,
Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of
the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No
bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Director of Engineering and
accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the City
of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 27th day of July, 1999.
Mayor
City Administrator
•
CITY OF HUTCHINSON CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
3run -98 3un -99
____ _ __ __ _ ______ ___ ___ ______ _ __ _ _____ ___ ______ ____ _ __ _ __ --------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- -- _------
TOTAL TOTAL
LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY MEEK LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEER
----- -- - -- --- - --- -- ---- --- - -- ----- - --- -- --- -- -- - - -- " "- - ---- ---- - -------- `--- "" -- - - -- "' ---"'-` - - -" -- ___-- -_
1 1,775 2,856 481 194 5,306 1 1,847 2,896 . 609 229 5,581
2 1,941 3,110 597 237 5,685 2 - 2,173 - 4,057 1,554 273 8,057
3 2,283 3,922 1,066 231 7,502 3 2,559 4,620 765 341 8,285
4 2,052 3,838 752 418 7,060 4 4,517 9,893 1,508 896 16,814
5 3,581 7,557 1,193 757 13,088 5 4,341 12,277 1,604 3,715 21,937
6 3,588 9,252 1,803 2,913 17,556 60,674
56,397 7 2,149 3,720 656 322 6,847
8 1,572 2,640 355 182 4,749 8 1,324 3,664 711 226 5,945
9 1,479 2,980 658 231 5,248 9 2,098 2,913 676 218 5,905
10 3,344 3,392 739 303 7,778 10 2,962 5,371 1,026 437 9,796
11 3,168 4,816 946 613 9,543 11 5,272 9,620 1,531 628 17,051
12 5,287 8,790 1,676 784 16,537 12 3,797, 9,982 1,532 1,557 16,868
13 3,920 8,909 1,684 1,641 16,154 62,412
60,009 14 2,540 3,319 584 276 6,719
15 2,130 3,905 513 234 6,782 15 1,788 3,048 659 195 5,690
16 1,676 3,330 399 309 5,714 16 2,530 4,369 757 312 7,968
17 1,998 3,527 714 355 6,594 17 2,666 5,706 1,121 635 10,128
18 2,671 4,835 788 369 8,663 18 4,962 9,333 1,516 591 16,402
19 4,198 8,301 1,247 642 14,308 19 4,814 12,488 1,997 1,174 20,473
20 4,913 11,188 1,678 1,248 19,027 67,380
- 61,168 21 2,291 3,328 459 312 - 6,390 -
22 1,884 3,090 563 290 5,827 22 1,568 4,213 614 208 6,803
23 1,654 2,934 389 287 5,264 23 2,355 4,321 662 339 7,677
24 1,937 3,855 455 309 6,556 24 2,346 5,711 715 376 9,148
25 2,543 4,710 654 372 8,279 25 4,442 10,495 1,348 805 17,090
26 3,887 9,177 1,053 950 15,067 26 3,877 9,020 1 1,115 15,623
27 4,009 8,547 1,268 881 14,705 62,731
55,696 26 2,218 2,881 594 191 5,884
29 2,242 3,561 457 637 6,897 29 2,332 4,276 663 262 7,755
30 1,907 3,421 678 .401 6,407 30 2,700 5,384 899 279 9,262
22,901
13,304 TOTAL 76,468 156,927 26,791 15,912 276,098
71,639 136,343 22,806 15,788 246,576
98 TOTAL 71,639 136,343 22,606 15,788 246,576
97 TOTAL, 62,881 135,497 21,616 15,743 235,737
%OF SALE 28 57 10 _ 6 100
8OF SALE 29 55 9 6 100
SALES INC OR DEC 29,522 12 4
SALES INC OR DEC 10,839 5 8
0
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JUNE 1997
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
LIQUOR
BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
TOTAL
BY WEEK
2
1,851
3,132
626
290
5,899
TOTAL
3
2,030
3,584
486
338
6,418
BY MEEX
4
2.171
4,307
- 612
433
7,523
5
2.302
6.050
855
397
9,604
8
3,808
8,873
1,457
971
14,909
7
3,959
8.861
1,253
3,214
17,287
5
3,511
7,557
1,193
757
13,081
61,440
9
2,692
3,375
344
377
6,788
10
1,719
3,122
533
251
5,825
56,397
11
1,894
3.894
699
317
6,804
12
1,819
5,170
793
553
8,335
13
4,819
9,024
1,359
1,435
16,638
14
4,105
12,430
1,845
1,243
19,623
12
5,217
0,790
1,676
714
16,537
63,813
16
1,354
3,512
1,023
238
6,127
17
1,582
3,190
427
284
5,483
60,009
16
1,785
3,208
529
284
5,806
19
2,158
4,201
1,280
316
7,953
20
3,752
7,734
1,314
632
13,432
21
3.421
7,695
1,289
667
13,273
19
4
8,301
1,247
642
14,388
52074
23
1.803
3,269
479
320
5,871
24
1,287
2,778
329
271
4.665
61,161
25
1,398
3,424
499
414
5,735
26
2,526
4,528
758
4e9
8.299
27
3,850
9,159
1,051
764
14,834
28
3,214
7,078
1,217
694
12,203
26
3,807
9
1,053
950
15,067
51,807
30
1,974
3,698
581
350
6,803
6,803
TOTAL
62,881
135,497
21,618
15,743
6,897
235,737
96 TOTALS
59.902
135,587
20,911
13.325
6,407
229.705
% OF SALE
27
57
9
7
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
6,032
3
%
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
71,639
97 TOTAL 62,801
%OF SALE Z9
SALES INC OR DEC
136,343 22,840 - '49
135,497 21,616 15,743
55 9 6
10,039
5 1
13,304
246,576
235,737
100
Sun -9e
-----
--- ---- ----
- - ----
------ --
-- ------ -------------
--
TOTAL
-
LIQUOR
BEER
MINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY MEEX
1
1,775
2,856
101
194
5,306
2
1,941
3,110
597
231
5,885
3
2,283
3,922
1,066
231
7,502
4
2,052
3,138
752
Ile
7,060
5
3,511
7,557
1,193
757
13,081
6
3,588
9,252
1,803
21913
17,556
56,397
8
1,572
2,640
355
182
4,749
9
1,479
21 ego
654
231
5,241
10
3,344
3,392
739
303
7,778
11
3,168
4,116
946
613
9,S43
12
5,217
0,790
1,676
714
16,537
13
3,920
1,909
1,684
1,641
16,154
60,009
15
2,130
3,905
513
234
6,782
16
11676
3,330
399
309
5,714
17
1,998
3,527
714
355
6
11
2,671
4,835
708
369
8,663
19
4
8,301
1,247
642
14,388
20
4,913
11,116
1,678
1,241
19,027
61,161
22
1,884
3,090
563
290
5,127
23
1,654
2,934
319
217
5,264
24
1,937
3,85S
455
309
6,556
25
2,543
4,710
654
372
8
26
3,807
9
1,053
950
15,067
27
4,009
1,547
1,261
111
14,705
55, 690
29
2,212
3,561
457
637
6,897
30
1,907
3,421
670
401
6,407
71,639
97 TOTAL 62,801
%OF SALE Z9
SALES INC OR DEC
136,343 22,840 - '49
135,497 21,616 15,743
55 9 6
10,039
5 1
13,304
246,576
235,737
100
e
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
LIQUOR STORE
COMPARISON
JUNE 1996
JUNE 1997
JUNE
TOTAL
TOTAL
1996
LIQUOR BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
LIQUOR
BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1
3,251
8,249
1,296
999
13,795
2
1,651
3,132
626
290
5,699
13,795
3
2.030
3.584
466
338
6,418
3
2,311
2,748
594
297
5,950
4
2,171
4,307
612
433
7,523
4
1,530
3,001
416
183
5,130
5
2.302
6,050
855
397
9,604
5
1,727
2,857
478
264
5,328
6
3,808
8,873
1,457
971
14,909
6
2,221
4,812
781
260
8,074
7
3,959
8,861
1,253
3,214
17,287
7
3,506
7,889
1,263
769
13.437
9
2,892
3,375
344
377
8,788
61.440
B
3,526
10,691
1,467
2,346
18.030
10
1,719
3,122
533
251
5,625
10
1,425
3,246
494
299
5,464
55,947
11
1.894
3;894
699
317
8,804
11
1,902
3,501
530
316
6,249
12
1,819
5,170
793
553
8,335
12
1,688
3,735
478
349
8,230
13
4,819
9,024
1,359
1,436
16,638
13
2,332
5,077
841
484
8,734
14
4,105
12,430
1,845
1,243
19,823
14
3,320
9,899
1,747
682
15,648
16
1,354
3,512
1,023
238
6,127
63,813
15
3,796
10,389
1,526
1,103
16,814
17
1,582
3,190
427
284
5,483
17
1,373
2,196
327
168
4,084
59,139
18
1,785
3,208
529
284
5,606
18
1,397
2.374
468
202
4,441
19
2,156
4,201
1,280
316
7,953
19
1,698
3,037
612
299
5,646
20
3,752
7,734
1,314
632
13,432
20
1,676
4,105
529
298
6,608
21
3,421
7,896
1,289
867
13,273
21
3,129
7,299
1,030
728
12.186
23
1,803
3,269
479
320
5,871
52.074
22
3,097
7,141
1,086
647
11,971
24
1,287
2,778
329
271
4,665
24
1,556
2,789
482
166
4,993
44,916
25
1,398
3,424
499
414
5,735
25
1,554
3,145
533
247
5,478
26
Z5+26
. 4,528
756
489
8,299
26
1,774
4,250
580
251
6,855
27
_ 3,860
9,159
1,051
764
14,834
27
2,198
5,564
961
416
9,139
28
3,214
7,078
1,217
894
12,203
28
4,141
8,558
1,200
828
14,525
30
1,974
3,898
581
350
6,803
51,607
29
3,794
9,007
1,192
924
14,917
6
55,9118
TOTAL
62,681,
135,497
21,616
15,743
235,737
TOTAL
59,902
135,667
20,911
13,325
229,705
96 TOTALS
59.902
135,567
20,911
13,325
229,705
95 TOTAL
58,786
125.729
20,146
11,350
216,011
% OF SALE
27
57
9
7
100
,% OF SAL
26
59
9
6
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
8,032
3
%
SALES INC OR DEC
13,694
6 %
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JUNE 1995
3,251
8,249
1,298
999
JUNE
3
2,311
2,748
594
297
TOTAL
1995
LIQUOR BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1
2,066
4,189
828
292
7,375
8
2
3278
7,723
1,301
719
13,019
3,508
3
3,649
8,784
1,277
2,141
15,851
10,691
1,467
2,346
18.030
10
1,425
3,246
36,245
5
1,189
2,537
431
184
4,341
316
6
1,290
2,946
378
228
4,842
6,230
7
1,539
2,507
424
151
4,621
14
8
1,870
2,969
528
278
5,643
3,796
9
3,186
5,849
905
500
10,440
2,196
10
3,157
5,594
949
539
10,239
468
202
4,441
19
t,698
3,037
812
40,126
12
2,244
2,939
462
226
5,871
6,608
13
1,503
3,859
951
410
6,723
22
14
2,091
3,825
483
391
6,790
1,556
15
2,023
4,939
676
364
8,002
3,145
16
3,093
8,375
1,193
611
13,272
580
17
3,817
11,193
1,638
1,208
1708
416
9,139
28
4,141
8,558
1,200
628
58,514
19
1,277
2,688
451
212
4,628
20
1,072
2,605
340
240
4257
21
1,976
3,372
558
297
8,203
22
1,753
4,295
702
355
7,105
23
3,204
6,870
1,063
176
11,313
24
2,871
6,983
1,002
176
11,032
44,538
26
1,198
2,322
381
239
4,140
27
1,378
2,368
515
262
4,521
28
1,686
3,067
415
287
5,455
29
2,333
4,566
912
274
8,085
30
4,045
8,367
1,363
592
14,387
36.588
TOTAL
58,786
125,729
20,146
11,350
218,011
94 TOTALS
47,655
102,951
15,059
8,397
174,062
% OF SALE
27
58
9
5
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
41,949
24%
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JUNE 1998 1996
0
JUNE TOTAL
1996 LIQUOR BEER WINE MISC. TOTAL BY WEEK
1
3,251
8,249
1,298
999
13,795
3
2,311
2,748
594
297
5,950
4
1,530
3,001
416
183
5,130
5
1,727
2,857
478
264
5,328
8
2,221
4,812
781
260
8,074
7
3,508
7,899
1,283
789
13,437
8
3,526
10,691
1,467
2,346
18.030
10
1,425
3,246
494
299
5,464
11
1,902
3,501
530
316
8,249
12
1,888
3,735
478
349
6,230
13
2,332
5,077
841
484
8,734
14
3,320
9,899
1,747
682
15,648
15
3,796
10,389
1,528
1,103
16,814
17
1,373
2,196
327
168
4,064
18
1,397
2,374
468
202
4,441
19
t,698
3,037
812
299
5.646
20
1,676
4,105
529
298
6,608
21
3,129
7,299
1,030
728
12,188
22
3,097
7,141
1,088
647
11,971
24
1,556
2.789
482
168
4,993
25
1,554
3,145
533
247
5,479
28
1,774
4,250
580
251
6,855
27
2,198
5,564
981
416
9,139
28
4,141
8,558
1,200
628
14,525
29
3,794
9,007
1,192
924
14,917
TOTAL 59,902 135,587 20,911 13,325
95 TOTAL 58,786 125,729 20,146 11,350
% OF SAL 26 59 1 6
SALES INC OR DEC 13,694
13,795
55,947
59,139
44,916
55,908
229,705
218,011
100
%
R
i
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JUNE 1994
1995
,
JUNE
JUNE
TOTAL
1994
LIQUOR BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1
2,169
2,314
179
195
4,857
828
2
1,786
3,451
441
249
5,927
1,301
3
2,452
6,778
1,009
489
10,728
1,277
4
2,667
7,808
1,040
1,090
12,605
36,245
5
1,189
2,537
34,117
6
1,192
2,577
349
201
4,319
378
7
1,164
1,836
363
121
3,484
424
8
1,133
2,081
406
157
3,777
528
9
1,454
3,176
566
288
5,484
905
10
2,379
5,691
719
388
9,177
949
11
2,646
6.247
1,039
630
10,562
40,126
12
2,244
2,939
36,803
13
1,274
2,577
438
169
4,458
951
14
1,331
2,978
404
213
4,926
483
15
1,300
2,475
368
132
4,275
676
16
1,796
3,906
487
257
6,446
1,193
17
2,601
6,226
820
414
10,061
1,638
18
3,305
7,633
1,170
680
12,988
58,514
19
1,277
2,688
43,154
20
1,110
2,053.
286
157
3,606
340
21
1,286
2,763
353
214
4,616
558
22
1,186
2,417
413
207
4,223
702
23
2,005
3,351
453
209
6,018
1,063
24
2,426
6,429
845
490
10,190
1,002
25
2,489
5,940
1,087
552
10,068
44.538
26
1,198
2,322
38,721
27
1,086
2,391
299
152
3,928
515
28
1,255
2,366
339
186
4,146
415
29
1,425
3,054,
566
213
5,258
912
30
2,738
4,233
620
344
7,935
1,383
592
14,387
21,267
TOTAL
47,655
102,951
15,059
8,397
125,729
174,062
93 TOTAL
41,523
80,941
12,836
6,644
102,951
141,944
% OF SALE
27
59
9
5
58
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
100
32,118
OR DEC
23
%
0 r •'
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
JUNE
1995
JUNE
TOTAL
1995
LIQUOR
BEER
WINE
MISC.
TOTAL
BY WEEK
1
2,066
4,189
828
292
7,375
2
3,276
7,723
1,301
719
13,019
3
3,649
8,784
1,277
2,141
15,851
36,245
5
1,189
2,537
431
184
4,341
6
1,290
2,946
378
228
4,842
7
1,539
2,507
424
151
4,621
8
1,870
2,969
528
276
5,643
9
3,186
5,849
905
500
10,440
10
3,157
5,594
949
539
10,239
40,126
12
2,244
2,939
462
226
5,871
13
1,503
3,859
951
410
6,723
14
2,091
3,825
483
391
6,790
15
2,023
4,939
676
364
8,002
16
3,093
8,375
1,193
611
13,272
17
3,817
11,193
1,638
1,208
17,856
58,514
19
1,277
2,688
451
212
4,628
20
1,072
2,605
340
240
4257
21
1,976
3,372
558
297
6,203
22
1,753
4,295
702
355
7,105
23
3,204
6,870
1,063
176
11,313
24
2,871
6,983
1,002
176
11,032
44.538
26
1,198
2,322
381
239
4,140
27
1,378
2,366
515
262
4,521
28
1,686
3,067
415
287
5,455
29
2,333
4,566
912
274
8,065
30
4,045
8,367
1,383
592
14,387
36.588
TOTAL
58,786
125,729
20,146
11,350
216,011
94 TOTALS
47,655
102,951
15,059
8,397
174,062
% OF SALE
27
58
9
5
100
SALES INC
OR DEC
41,949
24
%
0
Dater 07/01/99
Time: 09:57:34
Paget I
Item code Description
DEPTNO -) I (LIM)
Cant 1277 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -) 2 (BEER)
Count 626 Subtotals -)
DEPTND - -) 3 ININEI
Cant 1160 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE)
Cant 2 Subtotals-).
DEPTNO -) 9 MENIAL)
Cant 3 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -> 10 IT09ACCO PHOD(%:IS)
•t 425 Subtotals -)
DEPTNU -> 90 (MISC BFER)
Count I Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -) 91 (MISC LIM)
Cant 1 subtotals - ->
DEPTNO -> 92 (MISC NINE)
Cant 1 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Cant " 471 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 94 (MISSY.' NU 1A1)
Count 89 subtotals - -)
Cant 3056 Totals -)
(TUES)6 /01 /99-
MTD Sales Report (WED)6/30 /99
LIM HUTCH
on Extended - -- Month to date sales - -
Cls ordr Q-" cost Qty Cast Markdowns Sales Profits 61) %
29637 210586.28 7266
10283 70489.02 16257
20956 107174.57 4692
1787
189
2308 7383.36 1248
59237.84
123361.37
17471.22
499.81
25.00
3103.51
773.26 75696.46
985.74 155940.73
600.33 26190.70
3015.13
567.00
15.90 4223.34
16458.62 21.7
32579.36 20.9
8719.48 33.3
2525.26 83.8
542.00 95.6
1119.83 26.5
fill!
!!!!!
2534 4038.42 1804 5155.57 56.85 7165.68 2010.11 28.1
905 1621.87 268 560.74 5.97 860.25 299.51 34.8
........ xcsr...... ... =Z= =S ] CCC .... =9 224th. aO ........ a. cfuausas ...C[
66623 401293.52 33511 209405.12 2438.05 273659.29 64254.17 23.5
•
r
Date: 07/01N9
Time: 08:47:40
Page 1
YTD Sales Report
LIQUOR HUTCH
(SAT)1. ?/99-
(WED) AO/99
Extended------- - - - - -- -Year to Deis Sales --- -- -- --
Item Coda Description Q-O -H Cost Qty Cost Markdowns Sales Profits OP%
DEPTH04 I (Liquor)
Comet 1277 Subtota1 29637 21058628 40305 313284.86 3441.12 401856.48 85571.62 22.0
DEPTNOi (Beer) ...... ».. _ .. ....... ....... .... ._.. ......... ........ ......
Count 616 Subtota14 10283 70499.02 76620 55233399 3281.77 703220.80 152186.81 21.7
DEPTH04 (Wme) .. ....... ....... ....... ........ .... -... ......•. .....
Count 1160 Subtotal4 20956 10717457 23142 9422528 2616b1 140903.37 346677.49 33.1
DEPTNO4 $(Ice)
DEPTNO-+ 92 (Misc wine)
51055.39
6311.69
5256.30
83.3
-
33.00
........ .........
1033.01
........
1020.01
.....
96.7
16143.73
119.80 22287.66
6143.93
274
(Msc iquor) .......... ....... ....... ....... ........
Count 1 Sukota14 •••••••••••••�••••�••
Comt 2 subtotals
4131
DEPTH04 9 (Rental) ------ ----
....... .......
Count 3 subtotal4
318
DEPTNO410 (Tobacco Products) --- - - - - --
- - - - - -- .......
CoWt42S Subt o tal4 2308
7383.36 6318
DDTN0490 (Misc Beer) --- - - - - --
....... .......
Count 1 Subtotals
•••
DEPTNO-3 91 I
Coat 1 SObtota14
DEPTH04 93 (Misc 6.5%)
Count 271 Subtotal4 22334 4038.42 6843
DEPTNO-� 94 (Mize No Tax) .......... .... .....
Count 00 Subtotal-) 90S 1621.87 1369
COUNTS: 3856 TOTALS-
» ».
13130.72
........
263.22
---- ----
18796.40
3645.68
30.0
.......
2682.43
........
21.15
.........
4084.83
........
1402-38
.....
34.3
_.._... _. » _. ........ .........
66623 40129331 158849 992914.02 9745.73 110051624 30760222 23.7
7
0
DEPTNO —> 9 (RENTAL)
Cant 3 Subtotals - -) - - -- -`
9 40 —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Cant 425 Subtotals - -) -- - - -- - --
7383.36 29.2 2308
7373.71 10435.16
DEPTNO - -> 90 (MISC BEER)
Cant I Subtotals —) --
+++++
DEPTNU —> 91 IMIS'C LIgl )
"AS OF: 10PM"
07/01/99
--- -' -
- -` - -- - --
'—
10:00:07
quantity On Hand Report
MH
(WED)06 /30/99
Page: 1
LIM HITCH
Cant 1 Subtotals —)
CIS Ave. Cost
Ext p1/ Cost
Price I Dn Kit /
Item Code Description
Vendor Cross reference Last Cost
Ext L Cast
Ext Price 1 Bp % Min ordr q-O-H Trnsfr
DEPTNO —) 1 (LIQUOR)
Count 1277 Subtotals —)
- -'-
-- --
' - --
4038.42
2105&6.28
23.2 29637
4025.83
210354.77
274023.68 _
DEPTNO - -> 2 (BEER)
Count 626 Subtotals-->
- - --
---' -
—
1621.87
70489.02
22.2 10283
1598.06
70560.10
90574.60
DEPTNO —) 3 (WINE)
:...:..::.. .. ... .... =- �_...
:C. :n.:
Count 1160 Subtotals —>
26.9
- -- -- --
- - - -- - ---
400190.49
548771.04
107174.57
35.0 20956
106218.02
164843.57
DEPTNU —> 5 (ICE)
Cant 2 Subtotals —)'
--
- —
DEPTNO —> 9 (RENTAL)
Cant 3 Subtotals - -) - - -- -`
9 40 —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Cant 425 Subtotals - -) -- - - -- - --
7383.36 29.2 2308
7373.71 10435.16
DEPTNO - -> 90 (MISC BEER)
Cant I Subtotals —) --
+++++
DEPTNU —> 91 IMIS'C LIgl )
Cant l Subtotals - -)
--- -' -
- -` - -- - --
'—
MH
DEPTNO —> 92 (MISC WINE)
Cant 1 Subtotals —)
- - --
- - -- -^
MR
DEPTNO —) 93 (M15'C 6.5 %)
Count 271 Subtatals—>
- -'-
' - - --
4038.42
35.1
2534
4025.83
6223.08
DEPTNO —> 94 (MISC NO TAX)
Count 89 Subtotals - ->
- - --
�-
1621.87
38.3
905
1598.06
2626.95
0t 3856 Totals —>
:...:..::.. .. ... .... =- �_...
:C. :n.:
401293.52
26.9
66623
400190.49
548771.04
Date: 07/01/98
Tice: 06:39:17
Page: l
Item code Description
DEPTNO - -) 1 (LIQUOR)
Count 1146 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -) 2 (PEER)
Count 565 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 3 (WINE)
Count 1109 Subtotals - ->
DEPTNO - -> 5 (ICE)
Count 2 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO ) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 3 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROOUCTS)
Count 403 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count I Subtotals ->
DEPTNO -) 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count 1 Subtotals - ->
DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC WINE)
Count I Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO -) 93 (MISC 6.5%)
Count 286 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -) 94 (MISC NO TAX)
Count 86 Subtotals - -)
Count 3603 Totals - -)
(MON)6/01 /98-
(TUES)6 /30/98
Sorts: DEPTN'
MTD Sales Report Ranges: DEPRA:
LIM HUTCH Summary: Yes
on Extended - - Month to date tales --
Cis ordr Q -D-H Cost Qty Cost Markdowns ! Sales Profits GP %
24157 113334.32 7216 55432.01 672.67 70965.20 15533.19 21.9
10761 704Bb.41 14979 106700.07 749.67 135594.86 2BB94.79 21.3
17608 90485.89 4034 14990.92 455.86 22351.01 7360.09 32.9
1502 401.80 2500.98 2099.18 83.9
- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - ---- - - - --- - -- - - --
174 5.00 525.00 520.00 99.0
3186 9741.26 1850 4545.76 111.98 6179.55 1633.79 26.4
ttf#t
tffff
t # #ft
3931 b020.32 1610 4123.56 54.02 5624.23 1500.67 26.7
935 1867.55 250 496.04 7.46 784.42 288.38 36.8
_3 p L]LGLiCi _iiSGii C:GS G i iG 3 L L
b0578 351935.75 31615 186695.16 2051.66 244525.25 57830.09 23.6
4
0
Date: 07/01/98
Time: 06:40:00
Page: I
Item code Description
DEPTND - -) 1 (LIM)
Count 1146 Subtatals-->
DEPTND -> 2 (DEER)
Count 565 Subtotals - ->
DEPTND -> 3 (NINE)
Count 1109 Subtotals -)
DEPTND - > 5 (ICE)
Count 2 Subtotals - -)
DEPTND -> 9 (RENTAL)
Count 3 Subtotals -)
DEPTND - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
•nt 403 Subtotals-)
DEPTND - -> 90 (M1SC BEER)
Count 1 Subtotals - ->
DEPTND - -> 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count I Subtotals--)
DEPTND i 92 (MISC WINE)
Count 1 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO - -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 286 Subtotals ->
DEPTND - -) 94 (MISC NO TAXI
Count B6 Subtotals ->
Count 3603 Totals - ->
(FR 01 /02/98 -
(TUES )6/30/98
YTD Sales Report
LIQUOR HUTCH
Extended - - - - - --
Cle Q cost qty
Sorts: DEPTNB
Ranges: DEPTND
Summary: Yes
- Year to Date Sales - - -- - -- -
Cost Markdowns Sales Profits BP %
24157 173334.32 37676 289640.25 3337.67 370768.54 81128.29 21.9
10761 70486.41 75484 501988.33 2608.37 647342.39 139354.06 21.5
17608 90485.89 21643 86108.92 2297.26 128302.34 42193.42 32.9
4004
991.20
5867.96
4876.76
B3.1
-- - -- - - ---- - - - - --
324
- - - - - --
10100
-
1152.00
1142.00
99.1
- - -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- --
3186 9741.26 9449
- -- - -- --
21868.46
515.01 30112.72
8244.26
27.4
at+a+
** Ha
taaaa
- -- ----- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - --
3931 6020.32 7115 11905.46 204.83 16852.96 4947.50 29.4
935 1867.55 1210 2424.39 24.55 3734.22 1309.83 35.1
== =- = = == = -= ---- = =-- === -== =-_ ___ _____ ___ :__ :__: = = =-_
60578 351935.75 156905 920937.01 8987.69 1204133.13 283196.12 23.5
9
i
Date: 07/01/98
Time: 06:36 :17
Page: t
Item Code Description
quantity On Hand Report
LIQUOR HUTCH
CIS Ave. Cost
Vendor Cross reference Last Cost
Ext Av Cost
Ext L Cost
"AS OF: 10PM
(TUES)6 /30/98"
Price 1 On
Ext Price 1 Sp % Min : ^dr q-O -H
Kit /
Trnsfr
DEPTNO —) I (LIQUOR)
--- - - - --
- - --
- -- -- —
---
- - --
Count 1146 Subtotals - ->
- - --
- - - - - -- --
- --
173334.32
23.3
24157
172724.47
226119.92
DEPTNO —) 2 (BEER)
Count 565 Subtatals—)
-- -- —
- - --
70486.41
22.4
10761
70644.95
90842.58
DEPTNO —) 3 (WINE)
Count 1109 Subtotals —>
-
-- --
--
90485.89
35.3
17608
90231.20
139854.61
DEPTNO —) 5 (ICE)
Count 2 Subtatals —)
-
--
ttt +t
DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 3 Subtotals —)
--
-- - --
tt +++
•
DEPTNO —) IO (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Count 403 Subtotals —)
- - --
- - -- --
9741.26
29.5
3186
9761.51
13826.53
DEPTNO —) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count 1 Subtotals —)
—
- - --
- --
DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count 1 Subtatals—)
—
- - -- - --
--
t++++
DEPTNO - -) 92 (MISC WINE)
Count 1 Subtotals —)
—
- - - -- —
tt+ ++
DEPTNO - -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 286 Subtotals —)
- --
- - --
6020.32
32.7
3931
5992.49
8945.19
DEPTNO - -) 94 (MISC NO TAX)
Count 86 Subtotals —)
— — —
- - --
1867.55
35.6
935
1838.49
2900.65
Count 3603 Totals - -)
_xzC- = = = = :_
__ = -=
_ :._ : =,
351935.75
27.1
60578
351193.11
482489.48
r
0
Date: 07/01/97
Time: 10:47:05
Page: 1
Item cads Description
DEPTNO -) t (LIgl10H)
Count 1069 5ubtotali- -i
DEPTNO -> 2 (BEER)
Count 560 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO - -) 3 (WINE)
Count 1059 8ubtotals-
DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE)
Count 2 Subtotals - -)
DEPTHO -) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 5uhtatals -)
DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
O wnt 343 Subtotals -)
DEPTHO -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count l Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 91 IMISC LIQl10R1
Count 1 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO - -i 92 (MISC WINE)
Count 1 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 279 Suhtatais - ->
DEPTNO -> 94 (MISC NO TAX)
Count 6+) Subtotals -)
Count '7 latals - -i
HUTCH'
On Extended - - --
Cls ordr [---H cost Qty
(MON)$ 11 /97-
(MONO30/97
- Manth to date sales
Cast Markdowns Sales Profits BP %
25851 tGO021.61 6270 48677.36 703.49 62174.42 13497.06 21.7
10176 64568.54 15100 106477.93 598.36 134896.48 28418.55 21.1
17079 79518.13 4099 14114.57 467.11 21147.38 7032.81 7.3.3
- �- - 1776 449.00 2734.62 2285.62 83.6
-- - - -- - 148 452.02 452.02 100.0
2753 7571.86 1963 4242.33 120.27 5650.77 1408.44 24.9
t
0.92 0.92 100.0
tt#{rrt
3590 5856.79 1767 4444.15
89.87 61(24.78 1660.63 27.2
852
L589.52 --
- 207
399.35
4.94
586.78
187.43
31.9
607e)7
7 .:9126.45
31M
178&)4.69
1984.04
253748.17
54943.48
23.5
0
x
•
Date: 07101/97
Time: 10 :53:08
Page: t
0LIOLPR L
HUTCH"
Extended -
Cls Q -O-N cost qty
(FRI) 1 /3/97 -
(MON)0/30/97
-- Year to Date Bales - - --
Cost Markdowns Sales Profits 8P %
Itea code Description
DEPTNO -i 1 (LIQUORI
Count 1089 S'ubtotals--)
DEPTNO - -> 2 (BEEJI)
Count 560 Subtotals - ->
DEPTNO -> 3 (WINE)
Count 1059 uubtotals- ->
DEPTNO - -> 5 LICE)
Count 2 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO - -> 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 Subtotals - ->
DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Count 343 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO - -7 90 (MISC BEER)
Count t Subtotals-)
DEPP - M -i 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count 1 Subtatals-i
DEPTNO - -i 92 (MISC Wilk)
Count 1 Subtotals - ->
DEPTNO -> 93 (MLSC 6.5%)
Count 279 Subtatals-->
DEPTNO -> 94 IMISC M TAXI
Count 60 Wbtotals--}
Count 3397 Totais ->
25857
IM121.61
36062
272805.35
3420.73
349254.77
76449.42
21.9
10176
64568.54
70895
472973.64
2531.77
601243.96
128270.32
21.3
17079 79518.13 21071 00470:52 2404.86 121002.20 40523.68 33.5
3603 858.95 5238.97 4380.02 63.6
2 266 663.02 663.02 100.0
2753 7571.86 9357 2yJI01.11 305.52 27407.53 7306.42 26.7
+t+++
3540 5856.79 7t59 122t1.56 U447. 4y) 17111.56 4900.02 28.6
852 1589.52 968 1916.98 21.57 2834.04 917.06 32.4
6CJ307 3MI26,45 149381 861346.11 6991.65 1124976.07 263629.96 23.4
•
DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 Subtatal� >
0 - - - -- -- --' -- - --
+ t+tt
DEPTNO - -) 16 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Count 343 Subtotals —> -- -- — — —' -- - -- ' ---
7571.86 9.8 2753
7602.61 10787.48
DEPTNG - -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count i Subtotals - =: - --- --- ' - -- — ' - - -- - --
DEPTNO —> 91 (MISC LIM)
Count l Subtotals—? -- -- - - -' - - -- ' - -'
tt + +t
DEPTND - -) 92 (MISC WINE)
Count t Subtotals--) --- -- '— '—
DEPTNO —) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 279 Subtotals - ->
i
'LIQUOR
5886.E 8841.56
DEPTNO - -> 94 (MISC NO TAX)
HUTCH'
taunt Ea) Subtotals— :
-- - - -- - - - -- -- - --- - - - --
-
te: 97!(11/97
1569.52 31.8 852
Ov - nt 397 Totals - -i
AS OF: 10PM
Lae: 11:5':10
quantity On Hand Report
(MQN)6 130/97
Page: 1
LIQU(Il WICK
r_ls AVG. Cost
Ext Ay Cost Price
1 On kit t
Item Cade Description
Vendor Crass reference Last Cast
Ext L Cost Ext Price t Gp X Min ordr Q-0--H Trnsfr
DEPTNO - -> 1 (LIM)
Count 1069 Subtotals --i
--�— -
' - - - "- -- ' --
180021.61
13.3 25857
119866.47
234774.73
DEPTNO --> 2 (BEER)
Gaunt 56ti Subtotals--,
-- --
- -' -- - -- "-
64568.54
u. 10176
64576.49
& 3M 7 .64
DEPTNO - -) 3 (WINE)
Count 1059 Subtotals - ->
- --
- -- -- --
79518.13
34.6 17079
79815.90
121526.29
DEPTNO - -) 5 (ICE)
Count 2 Subtotals —)
-- —"
- -- - - -- - --
FNH
DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 Subtatal� >
0 - - - -- -- --' -- - --
+ t+tt
DEPTNO - -) 16 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Count 343 Subtotals —> -- -- — — —' -- - -- ' ---
7571.86 9.8 2753
7602.61 10787.48
DEPTNG - -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count i Subtotals - =: - --- --- ' - -- — ' - - -- - --
DEPTNO —> 91 (MISC LIM)
Count l Subtotals—? -- -- - - -' - - -- ' - -'
tt + +t
DEPTND - -) 92 (MISC WINE)
Count t Subtotals--) --- -- '— '—
DEPTNO —) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 279 Subtotals - ->
- ---- - - - - - -- - -- - - --
5856.79 33.8 3590
5886.E 8841.56
DEPTNO - -> 94 (MISC NO TAX)
taunt Ea) Subtotals— :
-- - - -- - - - -- -- - --- - - - --
-
1569.52 31.8 852
Ov - nt 397 Totals - -i
1559.16 7364.28
= _'________ ___'_______ - = ===
7 7.39126.45 26.5 6ON7
339306.85 461328.98
i
['ate: 96!30196
lime: 09 :45 :57
Faoa: I
Itea code Description
DEPTNO - -> I ILIMI
Gaunt 992 Subtotals -)
CEPTN7 -) 2 (BEER)
Crnmt 602 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO -) 3 (WINE)
Count 936 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO -} 5 )ICE)
Caint 3 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO --> 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 Subtotals -7
DEPTNO - -> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
Count 228 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -> 90 (M1SC BEER)
Count t Subtatals ->
DEPTNO -) 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count 1 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -> 92 (MISC WINE)
Count t Subtotals -)
DEPTHO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 330 Subtotals ->
'LIQUOR
(SAT)6/l/96-
HUTCHO
(SAT)6/29/96
On Extended -
--- -
-
Month to date sales
Cls ordr Q-O-H cost
Qty
Cost
Markdowns Sales Profits
6P %
23320 160915.61
553.67 59347.58 13156.41
22.2
46191.17
6412
8524 51268.83
14969
106483.45
537.59 135030.96 28547.51
21.1
21269 715B1.35
4124
13682.58
338.59 20570.43 6887.85
33.5
1609
468.20
2545.29 2077.09
81.6
97
589.03 589.03
1*
1823 3834.73
1715
3166.65
39.39 4275.90 1109.25
25.9
+t+t*
5134 7670.47 1812 4127.78 109.61 5767.01 1639.23 28.4
Carat 3096 Totals -7
- --- --- - -- - - - --- -
60070 VK71.25 30758 174119.83 1579.05 228126.20 54006.37 23.7
0
Gat ?: 06130!96
Tine: 09:46:39
Pa:go: I
Item code Description
DEPTN7 - -i I (LIM)
CDjnt 992 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO --) 2 (BEER)
Count 602 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 3 (NINEI
Count 936 Subtatals- -)
DEPTtd] i 5 (ICE)
Count 3 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO -i 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 5ubtatals-)
*
PTNO -7 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
ount 228 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 90 (MISC EEER)
Count 1 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -i 91 (MISC LIQUOR)
Count 1 Subtotals - -)
DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC WINE)
Count 1 Subtotals- -)
DEPTNO - -7 93 (MISC 6.5%)
Count 330 Subtatals -)
Count 3096 Totals -)
'LIQUOR
HUTCH'
Extended --
Cls 9-0-N cost qty
(WED)1/3/96-
(SAT)6/29/96
- -- Year to Date Sales -- -
Cost Markdowns Sales Profits BP X
23320
160915.87
33705
255636.55
3428.59
326361.85
70725.30
21.7
8524
51268.83
68638
454239.45
1917.81
579900.47
125661.02
21.7
21269 71581.35 20680 74876.45 2402.50 111831.03 36954.58 33.0
3158 733.40 4516.80 3783:40 83.8
130 909.04 909.04 100.0
1823 3834.73 7878 15149.61 261.52 20306.09 5156.48 25.4
+l +t+
* ++t*
R *+*#
5134 7670.47 7988 13546.58 255.90 18938.94 5392.36 28.5
-----
60070 295271.25 142177 814182.04 8266.32 1062764.22 248582.1B 23.4
0
DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROIXICTS)
Count 228 Subtatals-->
3834.73 29.3 1823
3946.40 5425.08
DEPTNO - -> Sri (MISC BEER)
Count l Subtotals—> _ -- —_ _ — - --
M**
DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIM)
Count I Subtotals —) _ - -- ___ - -- —_
DEPTNO —) 92 (NISC NINE)
Count 1 Subtotals —>
DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Corot 330 subtotals —) - - -- - - - -- —
7670.47 32.6 5134
7527.31 11376.36
Calint 3096 Totals _____ ,_,___:
295271.25 26.9 60070
292921.81 404203.37
"LIQU0R
0
HUTCH"
Date: 06730796
AS OF: 10PM
rime: 09 :47:12
quantity On Hand Report
(SAT)6/29/96
Pace: t
CIS Ave. Cost
Ext Av Cost
Price l
On Kit I
Item Code Description
Vendor Cross reference Last Cost
--- - - --
Ext L Cost
Ext Price 1
8p X Min ordr q-O-H Trnsfr
OEPTNO - -i l ILI0.JOR1
- -- - --
-- - - - - --
- --- --
-- — — -- - -_—
Count 992 Subtatals—>
—
- - --
-- - -_
160915.87
23.5 23320
158967.66
210391.78
DEPTNO - -) 2 (BEERI
Count 602 Subtotals —)
- --
- - - --
—
51268.83
i.6 8524
51312.94
66197.56
DEPTNO —> 3 (MINE)
Count 936 Subtotals —)
--
____ - -__
_ —_
71581.35
35.4 21269
71167.50
110812.59
DEPTNO —) 5 (ICE)
Count 3 Subtatals—)
-----
— _
—__
DEPTNO —) 9 (RENTAL)
Count 2 Subtotals—)
- - --
--
_ —__ --
DEPTNO - -) 10 (TOBACCO PROIXICTS)
Count 228 Subtatals-->
3834.73 29.3 1823
3946.40 5425.08
DEPTNO - -> Sri (MISC BEER)
Count l Subtotals—> _ -- —_ _ — - --
M**
DEPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LIM)
Count I Subtotals —) _ - -- ___ - -- —_
DEPTNO —) 92 (NISC NINE)
Count 1 Subtotals —>
DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Corot 330 subtotals —) - - -- - - - -- —
7670.47 32.6 5134
7527.31 11376.36
Calint 3096 Totals _____ ,_,___:
295271.25 26.9 60070
292921.81 404203.37
wo
0
Date: 07/01/95
'one: 13:46:28
Te: 1
Item code Description
DEPTNO - -) 1 (LIQIIDR)
Count 858 Subtatals -)
DEPTNO -> 2 (BEER)
Count 551 Subtatals-->
DEPTNO - -> 3 (MINE)
Count 791 Subtotals ->
DEPTNO -) 5 (ICE)
Count 3 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 9 (RENTAL)
Count I Subtotals ->
# TNO -) 10 (TOBACCO PROg1CTS)
nt 150 Subtotals -)
HFTNO - -) 90 IMISC BEER)
ImInt 1 Subtotals -)
.cPTNO - -> 91 (MISC LlgllC4t)
Calnt 1 Subtotals -)
DEPTNO -) 92 (MISC NINE)
Count I Subtotals -)
DEPTNO - -) 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 262 Subtotals -)
Gwnt 2619 Totals - -)
"LIQUOR (THURS)6 /l /95-
HUTCH" (FRI.)6/30/95
On Extended Month to date sales
Cls ordr Q-0-H cost qty Cost Markdmms Sales Profits 6P %
21610 151902.34 5981 45635.13 446.67 58139.05 12503.92 21.5
9196 50986.69 15014 98645.14 480.93 125249.49 26604.35 21.2
15593 58380.71 4163
13427.81
310.97 19843.69
6415.813
32.3
1595
294.93
2356.05
2061.12
87.5
31
1538 2648.49 1501 2687.98
2
4
310.00 310.00 100.0
37.70 3605.63 917.65 25.5
saaas
1.00 1.00 100.0
-7.19 -7.19 100.0
4726 6738.41 1970 4078.48 90.76 5741.37 1662.89 29.0
aesasasa aaases - -saa .aria..• seasseeaas vaasamaa ...sass ea • ....... as aaaa
52663 270656.64 30261 164769.47 1367.03 215239.09 50469.62 23.4
0
r
Date: 07/01/95
-`ae` 13`5006
qe: l
Item code Description -
Cls Q-O-H
'LIQUOR
HUTCH'
Extended - --
cost Qty
(MON)1 /2/95 -
(FRI)6130/95
- -- Year to Date Sales
Cast Markdowns Sales Profits
0
8P %
DEPTNO --)
1 (Ligl10R)
-
-
-- --
- -- -
-
Count 858
Subtotals -)
--
_
-
21610
151902.34
37136
244009.80
3361.08 309978.87
65969.07
21.3
DEPTNO -)
2 (BEER)
Count MI
Subtotals -)
-
-- - --
--
-
9196
50986.69
65471
402877.36
1412.55 512444.46
109567.10
21.4
DEPTNO - -)
3 (MINE)
Cant 791
Subtotals ->
-
--
-
-
- --
-
15593
58380.71
17215
60582.85
992.58 89762.12
29179.27
32.5
DEPTNO - ->
5 (ICE)
Count 3
Subtotals-)
-
3092
667.45
4517.28
3849.83
85.2
DEPTNO -)
9 (RENTAL)
Count 1
Subtotals ->
-
-
-
-
60
600.00
600.00
100.0
DEPTNO - -)
10 (TOBACCO PROD(1CTS)
Count 150
Subtotals -)
- --
-
-- -
-�
1538
2648.49
6963
12047.82
163.50 16061.08
4013.26
25.0
DEPTNO - -)
90 (MISC BEER)
Count t
Subtotals - -)
- --
- - - --
-
- - -- - - --
-
--
2
H"I
_.PTNO -)
91 (MISC LIU")
Cant I
Subtotals -)
-
- - --
-
--
- -- - - --
-
- --
4
1.00
1.00
100.0
DEPTNO -)
92 (MISC MINE)
Count 1
Subtotals ->
--
- --
--
--
-
-
-7.19
-7.19
100.0
DEPTNO - -)
93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 262
Subtotals -)
--
- - - --
- -- --
-
4726
6738.41
7973
12583.86
225.67 17994.18
5410.32
30.1
Count 2619
Totals -)
.... 8
......seae
- =. .... =
eavc ;ussa
......... ..........
ao•vim•e
v.ev
52663
270656.64
133016
732769.14
6155.58 951351.80
218582.66
23.0
0
DEPTHO —) 9 (REMTAL)
mt 1 Subtatals —) -- --
+ttt+
PTNO —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
.aunt 150 Subtatals —) -- — -- _-
2648.49 27.3 1538
2650.61 3642.96
DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count I Subtotals —) — — -- --
tt+ ++
DEPTNO —) 91 (MISC LIQUM)
Count 1 Subtatals —) — — —
t + + ++
DEPTNO —) 92 MISC NINE)
Count I Subtotals - ->
ttt ++
DEPTMfJ —> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 262 Subtotals - -> —_
6738.41 31.7 4726
6732.65 9667.37
Count 2619 Totals --) ::veeav vvevssva.. xeevv at�uva
270656.64 25.7 52663
242081.10 364476.66
'LIQUOR
ete:
HUTCH"
07/01/95
AS OF: 10PM
�me: 14:06:21
quantity On Hand Report
(FRI)6/30/95
ge: 1
Cis Ave. Cost
Ext Ay Cast Price I
On Kit /
Item Cade Description
Vendor Cross reference Last Cost
Ext L Cost Ext Price l
Sp % Min ordr q-Wi Trmfr
--
Cook 858 Subtatals —)
-- - --
— --
151902.34
23.0 21610
132747.40 197304.38
DEPTNO —> 2 (BEER)
Cant 551 Subtotals—)
- --
--
50986.69
21.9 9196
49895.11 65301.53
DEPTNO - -) 3 (NINE)
Count 791 Subtotals —)
- -
—
58380.71
33.9 15593
50055.33 88360.62
DEPTHO —> 5 (ICE)
Count 3 Subtotals —)
— —
— --
DEPTHO —) 9 (REMTAL)
mt 1 Subtatals —) -- --
+ttt+
PTNO —> 10 (TOBACCO PRODUCTS)
.aunt 150 Subtatals —) -- — -- _-
2648.49 27.3 1538
2650.61 3642.96
DEPTNO - -) 90 (MISC BEER)
Count I Subtotals —) — — -- --
tt+ ++
DEPTNO —) 91 (MISC LIQUM)
Count 1 Subtatals —) — — —
t + + ++
DEPTNO —) 92 MISC NINE)
Count I Subtotals - ->
ttt ++
DEPTMfJ —> 93 (MISC 6.5 %)
Count 262 Subtotals - -> —_
6738.41 31.7 4726
6732.65 9667.37
Count 2619 Totals --) ::veeav vvevssva.. xeevv at�uva
270656.64 25.7 52663
242081.10 364476.66
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -
:980 TIDS JOHNSON, LEONARD G. AUGUST PAYMENT $812.76
< *> $812.76*
19 LI3.CONST GEHRKE, DAVID LIBRARY BOOKCASE $485.00
< *> $485.00*
1999 IMPR. CONST SRF CONSULTING GROUP
WSB & ASSOC
AIRPORT RENOVAT. MATHIOWETZ CONSTRUCTION
PROFESS SERV -TH 15 $10,051.59
PROFESS SERV -2ND AVE BRIDGE $3,600.00
$13,651.59*
AIRPORT PROJECT -THRU 6/26/99 $159,831.25
$159,B31.25*
CAP.IMPRO.FUND KNOWLEDGE POINT
SOFTWARE LICENSES, UPGRADE $3,249.00
$3,249.00*
CENTRAL GARAGE
B & B SPORTS
PARTS, LABOR -77 LUND REPAIR
$112.46
BRANDON TIRE CO
TIRES
$397.64
CENTRAL HYDRAULICS
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
$10.82
CROW RIVER AUTO
PARTS, LABOR- POLICE 4
$171.63
DOYLE INCORPORATED
REPLACEMENT FAN MOTOR
$236.61
HOLT MOTORS INC
CREDIT CORE
$769.33
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
BATTERIES
$381.04
L & P SUPPLY CO
BELT
$203.78
MN BODY & EQUIPMENT
FAN & BLADE
$149.27
SCHRAMM IMPLEMENT
CLEANER
$67.03
STEPP MFG CO INC
HEATER, HOLD DOWN
$216.75
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
FUSES, SHRINK TERMINALS
$133.42
VIKING SIGNS
VINYL LOGOS ON TRUCK
$420.00
< *>
$3,269.78*
GENERAL FUND
AMERICAN BOTTLING CO, THE
JULY POP
$25.00
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
PROFESS SERV THRU 6/30/99
$429.11
•
B & B SPORTS
BARR ENGINEERING CO
CARBUTETOR KIT
PROFESS SERV - SURFACE WATER
$15.14
$248.08
BAUMETZ, BONNIE
REIMB- MILEAGE
$55.49
BERGLUND, JAY
UMPIRE
$629.00
BERKLEY RISK SERVICES
PROFESS CONSULT -JUNE, MILEAGE
$1,442.60
BERNICKS PEPSI COLA
POP PURCHASE
$75.60
BLOCK, MARGIE
REFUND -SR TOUR
$10.00
BROWNS GREENHOUSE
4 PKS FLOWERS
$200.13
BRY -AIR
CONTROL RELAY
$119.75
BRYGGER, SCOTT
REFUND- CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$20.00
BUFFALO LAKE /HECTOR BOOSTERS
DUNK TANK RENTAL
$25.00
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
PATCH CORD
$1,440.20
CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY
COATED BOND, 20LB BOND
$265.08
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
INKJET CARTRIDGES
$49.52
CENTRAL GARAGE
JULY VEHICLE RENT
$14,600.00
CENTURY LABS
WEED KILLER, VULKEM 116 TUBE
$112.83
CERES ENVIRONMENTAL
HARDWOOD MULCH
$914.74
CHIEF SUPPLY CORP
BATTERIES
$326.12
COAST TO COAST
OPERATING SUPPLIES
$97.38
COMM TRANSPORTATION
LOAN PYMT
$700.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
CONNECT & OPERATIONS CHARGES
$390.00
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR FEES TO STATE
$634.00
DEPT OF COMMERCE
NOTARY RENEWAL -JEAN GRAY
$240.00
DESIGNERS UNLIMITED
COUNCL RETREAT & EXPENSES
$512.40
DISPLAY SALES
EXECUTIVE ALUM POLE 35'
$1,165.33
DOMINO'S PIZZA
PIZZAS, POP
$45.55
DOOLEY CONSTRUCTION
LABOR, MATERIALS- REMODEL
$329.55
DORIVAL, SHARON
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$22.00
DRAHOS, ROBERT
REPURCHASE CEMETERY LOTS
$320.00
ECOLAB PEST ELIM
JULY SERVICE
$3,9.41
ESS BROTHERS & SONS
ADJ RINGS
$889.35
EVESLAGE, JOE
HOURS WORKED
$31.50
FASTENAL COMPANY
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
$312.03
FERNANDEZ, CHERYL
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$40.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$38.34
GARCIA, JESUS
REFUND DANCE PERMIT FEE
$50.00
GEHRKE, LEROY
CHAPEL -SPRAY TEXTURE
$175.00
•
/ �q -'�,
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
------------------------------------------------
GENERAL FUND GRINA, LISA
GROEHLER, FLOYD
• GRUFRUFF DESIGN
HALI -BRITE INC
HANKE, MICHELLE
HARRIS COMPANIES
HAUGEN, MARV
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HEMMAH, LLOYD
HENRYS FOODS INC
HENSEN, MARK
_ HILARY, KRISTIN
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
HUTCHINSON MOTORSFORTS
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
JOES SPORT SHOP
KRISHNAMOORTHI, CHITRA
- L & P SUPPLY CO
LUND, SHERRY
M R SIGN
MANKATO MOBILE RADIO
MCKAY, KAREN
MCLEOD COOP POWER
MCLEOD COUNTY CHAPTER
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
MEMINDEX
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
MILLER, DIANE
MILLER, MARVIN
MINI BIFF
MISTY & FRIENDS MOBILE ZOO
MITCHELL, WILLIAM
-_ MN ELEVATOR INC.
- - -- MN SAFETY COUNCIL
• MN U C FUND
MODERN MAZDA
MOON, DOLF
MURPHY GRANITE CARVING
NACKERUD, NANCY
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
OLSONS LOCKSMITH
PANKAKE, GARY
PERFORMANCE COMPUTER FORMS
PETERSON BUS SERVICE
PLOTZ, GARY D.
QUADE ELECTRIC
R & R EXCAVATING
RADISSON HOTEL PLAZA
RECREONICS
REDING, PEGGY
RUTZ PLBG & HTG
SAFETY LEAGUE
SALLY DISTRIBUTORS
SANDEEN, NANCY
SCHRADER, JEFF
SCHROEDER, KYLE
SCHWANS SALES ENTERPRISES INC
SCHWEIZER, JAN
SEWING BASKET
SHOPKO
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY
STANDARD PRINTING
SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS
SUSSNER, DION
SWANSON, MARILYN
TELECKY, MATT
TWO WAY COMM INC
UHL CO.
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 2
REIMB -POST IT'S, FILE FLAGS
$23.51
REIMB - MILEAGE, PARKING
$49.00
T- SHIRTS
$184.25
LAMPS
$217.48
REFUND - CANCELLED BALLET DANCE
$13.00
MAY SERVICE MAINT INSPECT
$499.00
REFUND - CANCELLED SKATE LESSONS
$15.00
CHLORINE, LY- STABILIZER
$581.90
UMPIRE GAMES
$221.00
CREDIT STIR STICK
$1,071.51
REIMS- MEALS, MILEAGE, LODGING
$652.98
REFUND - CANCELLED GYMNASTICS
$28.00
TOWELS, TISSUE, CLEANERS
$1,385.47
EXTING RECHARGE
$16.93
PHYSICAL -VASKO
$337.50
1999 PERA AID
$39,856.50
TORO WORK MASTER RENTAL
$275.00
BUBLS
$17,914.49
-
870 CAP W /SLING SWIVEL
$1,056.66
MATERIALS, LABOR- AIRPORT
$1,696.59
PLAQUE
$45.00
REIMB - MILEAGE, EXPENSES
$50.53
PLUG
$357.46
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$40.00
SIGNS
$667.29
RAPID CHARGER, SPRING CLIP
$77.85
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$20.00
JUNE UTILITY
$384.22
LIFEGUARD BOOKS, CPR BOOKS
$223.00
J KEPLER /VARIANCE APPLIC
$538.50
WALL PLANNERS
$141.39
FINES
$237.48
JULY CELL PHONE
$1,134.01
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$22.00
UMPIRE GAMES
$102.00
UNIT RENTAL- ARMORY
$79.88
TOUR
$244.00
UMPIRE GAMES
$398.00
JUNE ELEVATOR SERVICE
$73.65
REG- BRENDA EWING, JO RUNKE
$170.00
QTR 2 PAYMENT
$124.94
VEHICLE TOW
$17.04
REIMB- PARKING /LMC CONFERENCE
$19.26
MEMORIAL CARVING
$123.00
REFUND- CANCELLED GYMNASTICS
$13.00
HOSE
$33.75
KEYS
$5.59
UMPIRE GAMES
$285.00
PAPER
$96.83
JUNE COACHES
$589.55
REIMB -MEALS
$16.00
BALLASTS, WIRE NUTS
$209.20
INSTALL HYDRANT -NORTH JC PARK
$600.00
INC HOUSING
$2,037.95
PADDED HAND BARS
$130.12
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$22.00
MATERIALS, LABOR -AC REPAIR
$183.00
UNIFORM
$144.85
TICKETS, PRIZES
$72.30
REFUND - CANCEL MUSIC & RHYTHM
$20.00
UMPIRE GAMES
$170.00
MILEAGE
$40.92
SCHWAN'S PURCHASE
REFUND - CANCEL MUSIC & RHYTHM
$ $55.93
10.00
UNIFORM REPAIR
$122.02
HUGGIES PULL UPS
$100.85
STORAGE SHED
$399.38
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
$55.92
CREDIT /RETURN KEYBOARD DRAWER
$468.33
COFFEE
$144.77
UMPIRE GAMES
$102.00
REIMB - VIDEOTAPES FOR COUNCIL
$12.72
REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS
$60.00
MOTOROLA CELL PHONE
$4,114.88
MATERIALS, LABOR -CITY CENTER
$1,631.98
BRACING MATERIAL, TRTD PINE
$252.20
F_
L_ J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL
REPORT
27 -JUL -1999
(14:46)
page 3
_____________________________________________________________________
GENERAL FUND
US OFFICE PRODUCTS
_______________________________
REPORT COVERS
$12.41
•
WAL -MART
WINZER CORP
CALCULATOR, BUG SPRAY
OPERATING SUPPLIES
$227.19
$284.52
WISCHNACK, JULIE
REIMB- INSTANT CAMERA FILM
$12.77
WITTE SOD
33 YARDS SOD
$29.70
XEROX
COPIER LEASE
$908.75
ZILLMER, RICK
UMPIRE GAMES
$255.00
< *>
$112,352.88*
HUTCH COMM DEV.0
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
JULY CELL PHONE
- $18.75
< *>
- $18.75*
.:TCH TRANS FAC.
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE /HUTCHINSON
HAND CLEANER
$14.53
KLEESPIE
LABOR, MILEAGE, SUPPLIES
$192.46
L & P SUPPLY CO
COVER
$18.05
QUADE ELECTRIC
MATERIALS, LABOR -HATS BLDG
$768.72
SCHMELING OIL CO
FUEL
$7,703.35
SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS
COFFEE
$35.63
< *>
$8,732.74*
LIQUOR STORE
BELLBOY CORP
JULY MISC
$2,591.66
BUFFALO CREEK ENTERPRISES
BLOODY MARY SEASONING
$59.52
C & L DISTRIBUTING
JULY BEER
$50,512.90
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CALCULATOR
$95.84
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
JULY LIQUOR
$5,411.44
GRIGGS & COOPER TOBACCO DIV
JUNE MISC
$191.72
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
JUNE LIQUOR
$24,580.04
HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
JULY BEER
$2,806.50
HUTCHINSON WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP
RODEO SPONSORSHIP
$150.00
INSURANCE P LANNE RS
LIABILITY RENEWAL
$6,883.49
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
JULY LIQUOR
$14,817.63
JORDON BEVERAGE INC.
JULY BEER
$2,283.65
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
JULY BEER
$10,186.60
LOCHER BROS INC
JULY BEER
$37,128.40
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
JULY CELL PHONE
$0.32
MMBA
1999 -2000 DUES
$550.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
JULY WINE
$183.00
•
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
JULY LIQUOR PURCHASE
$2,413.27
TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE
DIRECTORY ADVERTISING
$249.00
TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY
JULY BEER
$99.30
< *>
$161,194.28*
PUBLIC SITES
MCLEOD COOP POWER
JUNE 1999 ELEC HOOKUPS
$7,200.00
RYAN COMPANY
REFUND -PARK & PLGD -PAID TWICE
$11,809.80
< *>
$19,009.80*
SCDP 97 Hsg Reh
HOLMQUIST LUMBER
ROOF, WINDOW, DUCT WORK
$6,885.31
<*>
$6,885.31*
TAX INCREMENT
AUGUSTA BUILDING CORP
JUNE SETTLEMENT
$24,024.90
PRINCE OF PEACE SENIOR APT. IN
JUNE SETTLEMENT
$11,044.60
< *>
$35,069.50*
WATER /SEWER FUND
AAGARD WEST
TANK & CART PICKUP
$1,921.50
AM.WATER WORKS ASSN
REG- RICHARD NAGY
$150.00
AM.WELDING SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES
$16.99
BENNETT OFFICE SUP.
METER READINGS
$15.00
BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS
LABOR
$45.00
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CALCULATOR, PROTECTOR
$13.42
CONVEYOR DESIGN
CONSULTING, MILEAGE
$4,514.24
CULLIGAN WATER COND
SOFTNER RENTAL
$49.20
DEVRIES, RANDY
REIMB -MEALS
$48.17
DYNA SYSTEMS
HDWE
$200.34
EARTH TECH /RUST
PROFESS SERV- COMPOST FACILITY
$66,131.41
ELECTRIC PUMP /WALDOR GROUP
ROTO FLOAT, LABOR, MILEAGE
$789.80
FASTENAL COMPANY
MACH LIFE EYE
$63.59
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
LAB SUPPLIES
$148.05
FLO- AMERICA
EXCHANGE TANKS
$205.00
GOPHER STATE INC
JUNE CALLS
$164.50
F_
L_ J
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 4
WATER /SEWER
FUND HACH COMPANY
LAB SUPPLIES
$2D6.08
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER
VALVE BOX RISER
PHYSICAL- BURMEISTER
$64.97
$112.50
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
JUNE UTILITY
$363.26
IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES
UNIT RENTAL- COMPOST SITE
$54.05
INDUSTRIAL MAINT SUPPLIES
BITS
$38.39
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
MATERIALS, LABOR -WWTP
$61.90
LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORP
SHAFT MOUNT REDUCER
$6,999.00
MCKIMM MILK TRANSIT INC
MOVE BOXES 1 & 2
$90.00
MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM.
JULY CELL PHONE
$31.76
MN VALLEY TESTING LAB
WATER TESTS
$232.00
NALCO CHEMICAL CO.
CORROSION INHI
$3,964.98
NCL
LAB SUPPLIES
$441.90
PRAIRIE COUNTRY RC & D COUNCIL
PROFESS SERV -JOHN MADOLE
$1,435.50
QUADE ELECTRIC
LAMP HOLDER
$2.08
RADISSON HOTEL PLAZA
LMC HOUSING
$253.72
SCHMELING OIL CO
RYKON MV
$69.86
SERV -O -CAL
MATERIALS, LABOR, MILEAGE -WWTP
$385.00
SMITH & LOVELESS
RETROFIT /PARTS
$8,221.80
STAR TRIBUNE
INVIT TO BID - 7/4/99
$369.34
TWO WAY COMM INC
CASE REPLACEMENT
$50.00
USA WASTE SERVICES INC
LANDFILL LOADS 7/1 - 7/16
$5,678.52
WAL -MART
BLEACH
$14.57
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
JUNE LISTING
$60.00
ZD JOURNALS
SUBSCRIPTION
$49.00
<
$103,726.39+
WIRE TRANSFERS
.A.T.S. FUND FIN DEPT OF REVENUE -JUNE FUEL TAX
ATER /SEWER FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX
ENERAL FUND MN DEPT OF REVENUE -SALES TAX (ARENA)
• 177R$I96
ADDITIONAL WIRE
PRANSFERS
T* CITY STAFF A BANK CWFKXAL S
FR06t N= NEReeu,FftAMZ DRLCTDR
SIAICT: ALMWV RETRANSFER
Tte lobloiq M1de need to be wied - Y�Or.t payrtrmb
oemm
Cher NYC ABA 1021-000.02110 credit to so=" of Cede B
Co. cro TFIE DEPOSITORY TRUST CO6PANY IN DNWmtd Deptelt
Almaai N 055- 020778 OBI FIELD - PA 30317950
(1) 1990A G. O Medical FmdMMs
1996A O. O Taxable Medical Fau3flse
1990 knbru mnam Sonde
1991 Im"mmtsa Bonds
1992 krRlaaeme d Bonds
19951 m mmraaK Sable
1994 kmbi ove melt sonde
1995I.."a,etn s Saba
19968 Gmerm r, A FIATS
199e Ynpouer11m4 Bantle
1997 kmmvwnmt Saba
1 me kmrtwwnmd gabs
(1) Ir1Wem of $90,076.75 will be vied ken Flreet
90X7173
1]
58,006.00
10X70.00
17,307.50
27,31123
7!X10.73
07,110.03
00.178.76
3390! 73
70,430.73
40=75
52,177.08
440,77021
440.77021 670443M
The folbwig funds need m be wietl - PRMQPAL Patwrca
Chase NYC ABA 0 021-000-021 to credit to somnt Of Code &
Co. Uo THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY 1m 11e4nplbn DePUei
Aaount a 066-027-306 O& FIELD - PA 50317950
1998A G. O Taxable Meacal FedlOw 15.000.00
16X00 00
2,09$X00.00 WIRl FROM FRSTAR
$628,251.53*
476.00
6,991.00
2,154.00
(FAX of bab doa,ment must be made at some are Na oacpal polomme)
IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT
27 -JUL -1999 (14:46) page 1
__ -___ ----------- - - - - -- __------ __________ - _----- _ - - -_ --
CAP.IMPRO.FUND HUTCHINSON YOUTH HOCKEY ASSC. PER AGREEMENT $191,500.00
< *> $1911500.00*
CORAL GARAGE
GENERAL FUND
HOSPITAL BONDS
LIQUOR STORE
PAYROLL FUND
0
FIRST CHOICE REPAIR
AAGARD WEST
CHILD'S PLAY THEATRE
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
FOREPAUGHS
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
MN TWINS
MPCA
MRPA
US POSTAL SERVICE
FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA
INSTALL SHORT BLOCK
JULY PAPER RECYCLE
40 TICKETS RUMPELSTILTSKIN
DNR FEES TO STATE
SR TOUR -45 GUESTS
JULY SERVICE
56 TICKETS
STORM WATER PERMIT FEE
MN LYNX 7/23/99 28 TICKETS
POSTAGE FOR COMM NEED SURVEY
INTEREST PAYMENT
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN PAYROLL 7/16/99
LEO'S TRANSFER - JUNE & JULY FREIGHT
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. LIQUOR PURCHASE
WEGNER,NEIL REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE, EXPENSES
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS.
CO. EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
H.R.L.A.P.R.
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
EE
CONTRIB
7/1D/99
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT
CENTE MANDATORY CHILD SUPPORT
PERA LIFE INS CO.
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
PERA- D.C.P.
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
PRUDENTIAL
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
TEMPLETON INC
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
WADELL & REED
EE
CONTRIB
7/10/99
WATER /SEWER FUND AAGARD WEST
MINNCOMM PAGING
NAGY, RICHARD
c *>
JULY SERVICE
JULY SERVICE
TRAVEL EXPENSE
$2,000.92
$2,000.92*
$1,528.61
$195.00
$776.00
$553.50
$1,087.14
R 168.00
240.00
196.00
$995.50
$5,739.75*
$220,453.43
$220,453.43*
$8,156.77
$1,119.94
$3,755.88
$75.05
$13,107.64*
$690.00
$54.30
$100.00
$177.74
$2,651.15
$169.35
$126.00
$52.02
$75.00
$30.00
$17,821.62
$250.00
$150.00
$22,347.18*
$264.99
$24.25
$1,272.47
$1,561.71*
$456,710.63*
E
EMPLOYEE SAFETY COMI HTTEE
HIINUTES: NNE I7 1999
PRESENT: Brad Emans, Radny Starke, Mark Wies, Mark Larson, Dave Telecky
May Minutes were approved
• Police department will be making the employee safety badges in July
• Picnic will be at 12 noon in August — Bring your alternate along
• There will be a training meeting from 8:30a.m. — 10:30a.m. July 10 titled"How'd
they Do That — Los Control Workshop
• Discussion of shorts worn for part time employee's. Safety commtittee is not in favor
of this. Also Steel toe boots '
• There will be a loader certification class before the end of the year for all operators of
this piece of equipment
• Everyone is using Respond for their first Aid supplier
• NEXT MEETING JULY 19 KUM MESSNER IS TAKER OF THE MINUTES
•
RECEIVED
II II 2 01999
CITY OF HU I Qmir4soN
July 16, 1999
Hon. Marlin Torgerson
Mayor of Hutchinson
Hutchinson Cary Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Torgersm
Municipal services am sometimes controversial and there are those who are not supportive of municipal
capital improvement projects.
Occasionally however, we Ww those services, and the people who provide them, for granted without
appreciating what they mean to us.
I am enclosing for the council's review a copy of an article which appeared in the Wall Street Journal of
June 18, 1999 which outlines whet happens in communities that don't have, for example, adequate fresh
water supplies.
With warm personal regards and best wishes for continned m=ess, I remain
1105 Jorgenson
Hutchinson, MN 55350
320 587 7049
651 297 1007 W
gba@hut net
•
= 3mmmm g �' ag E: N Ng�
� 3a�BoA p�AN���mo3A���,�A
(� s•� e b ^— a o-a rf
7a�C, a — V, G- ra nmAap'��E 2, ..'�� C � �
'Jm `�ip Fr. wEp+aE s o r-' ,»o ww m r �. °»� E w P C /}�
a'n. ♦ "+-.'V mF'B, N w�� �"C�• ^��Sgw a. ,���•.' lV ✓ �. �.
oo�m•�� a��� ���`�°�w5o3
N ` n gxgo g £ �.,
m ar�a'q.d. y w fi S� n_ w��t %%%%4SSS i
d a H' g w m i° N A I F p7 I �
`G'O G
a,w 35 ,� o a '�• om•e '+ gJC' p"'f
° ic r" 5CaR E ` °�Fn"'a.F'^v
amr
•
FL N
Nestle Aims to Sell Bottled Water in Developing Nations
Continued From Page Bl
made its debut In Pakistan late last year and
will soon go to Brazil, with megamarkets
like India and China under consideration.
The launch of Pure Life raises delicate
issues about the business of selling water
In developing countries, at a time when an
estimated one billion people lack access to
basic water services. In Pakistan, that has
tragic consequences: 40`Y, of deaths of chil-
dren below the age of five here are caused
by waterborne diseases.
"Nestle steps In and fills a need, but rums
water into a luxury," says Peter Gleick, direc-
tor of the Pacific Institute, a think tank based
in Oakland, Calif. Others worry that the ar-
rival of private- sector products fake Pure Life
could encourage governments to curtail fur-
ther investments in water Infrastructure.
Nestle already has stirred controversy
in the developing world, with allegations
that it engages in overly aggressive tac-
tics to market its powdered baby formula.
"We don't want Nestle going In and saying
to women, 'Bottled water is safe,' to dis-
suade them from breast- feeding," says
Patty Rundell, a campaigner at Baby Milk
Action, an activist group In Cambridge,
England.
Nestle says It strictly adheres to World
Health — nization marketing guidelines
on bttst�rnWa. There Is no evidence in
Pakist, t , fosuggestthatNestleisusingPure
Life to cross- market baby formula.
Peter Brabeck, Nestle's chief execu-
tive, says Pure Life Isn't intended to be "a
solution" to the world's water problems. He
says the idea sprang partly from his expe-
rience living in Latin America where "the
water tasted terrible."
'I said, 'Why not create a product that
fulfills basic needs like taste, safety and
high mineral content, but which is made lo-
cally to reduce costs?'" he recalls.
So far, Pakistanis are reaching for Pure
Life in record numbers. After six months,
the brand has taken over 503b of the coun-
try's small bottled -water market of 33 mil-
lion liters (35 million quarts) a year, accord-
ing to Nestle. Pure Life is everywhere—at
roadside stalls, gas stations and rest slops.
It's hawked at street corners in traffic -
clogged Lahore. Middle -class shoppers buy
it by the case In supermarkets. On the re-
mote mountain road leading from Islam-
abad to the hill town of Murree, Pure Life
billboards urge drivers to "drive only Nes-
tle Pure Life." At small stores along the
way, a flurry of banners proclaim: "Pure
Safety, Pure Trust. The ideal water. From
Nestle with love."
The potential is enormouo-_ Currently,
per capita consumption of bortied water in
developing countries like India and Pak -
Istan Is less than half a liter a year, co r
pared with 111 liters in Fran( nd 45life
in the U.S., according to Euromonitor, a
market research company. And with the
once -strong European market now flat,
the fastest - growing markets for bottled
water are developing countries like India,
where volume nearly quintupled between
1993 and 1997. Nestle has about 16% of the
global market for bottled water, concen-
trated mainly In Europe and the U.S., but
only 1% in Asia.
Still, making Pure Life a global block-
buster won't be easy, even for a marketing
machine like Nestle. local competitors In
Pakistan are already scrambling to protect
their turf. Nestle's main rival, France's
Damon SA, the world's No. 2 water com-
pany and owner of the Evian brand, is eye -
Ing emerging markets, too.Nestle's Pure
Life marketing strategy stumbled at first
Two months before its launch, Nestle asked
Its Lahore ad agency, Interflow Communi-
cations Ltd., to raise public awareness of
waterhygiene issues, which resulted In a se-
ries of "awareness seminars." Pakistani
health'officials appeared, saying that urban
water supplies were contaminated and that
even 14 bottled waters were tainted, accord-
ing to tests by the country's environmental
agency.
Nestle's name wasn't mentioned. But a
spokesman said the company soon grew un-
P happy with the "tone" of the seminars and
asked Interfiow to discontinue lherr;. "We
didn't want to be perceived as stirring ul
controversy, although what Was said by UP
officials was factually correct and no
planted by Nestle," explains Francois Per
rood, the Nestle spokesman in Switzerland.
Mr. Perroud acknowledges that medii
coverage of the seminars helped Pure life
though he maintains that Nestle didn't vin
late ethical marketing standards. Still, hr
says the company won't repeat the semi
nars in other launch countries.
Regardless, the seminars leave a No
taste In the mouths of some Pakistanis.
"These foreign companies are misleading
the people to make money," charges Mw
hammed Amin, managing director of the
Lahore Water Supply Company, after
learning of the seminars. He says the local
wst ^r is basically good when it is pumped
out, but •, •- ety pipes and leaking
sewage deg,,: y '.y the time it
comes out of the tap. That's why water bills
carry a warning to customers to broil it be-
fore drinking, Mr. Amin says.
Pure Life won't reach everyone in Pak-
istan, where the per capita annual income is
roughly $495. "The fact that everybody
can't afford Pure Life is unfortunate, but
does that mean we shouldn't sell it at all?"
asks Hans - Dieter Karischeuer, director of
Paris -based Perrier-Vlttel SA 's wa-
ter division. "We can't than world.
We can onlytry toimproveita le."