Loading...
cp05-23-2000 cAh As A& MAY SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 2000 -21- -22- -23- HUTCHINSON 1:30 a.m. — Management Team 7:00 am. — Leadership Team CITY Meeting in Main Conf Room in Main Conference Room CALENDAR 11:00 a.m. & 1:00 p.m. - Back 4:30 p.m. - Library Board at Safety Training in Council Library Chambers 4:00 p.m. — City Council WEEK OF Receive RFP for Franchise Workshop on Capital Outlay Plan Applications in Main Conference Room May 21-27 5:30 p.m. — City Council Meeting in Council Chambers WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY -24- -25- -26- -27- CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/ 10:30 a.m. — Employee Safety 7:00 a.m. — HCDC/EDA Board TRATNiNG/VACATION Committee at City Center Main Meeting in Main Conf. Room Conference Room 22 Marilyn J. Swanson (V) 3:00 p.m. — Right -of -Way Task Force in Main Conference Room C =Conference M — Meeting S = Seminar T =Training V = Vacation • AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000 1 2. INVOCATION — Pastor Randy Chrissis of Christ the King Church 3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of April 25, 2000 and May 9, 2000 Action - Motion to approve as presented 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 2000 2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 18,2000 3. FINANCIAL REORT AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR APRIL 2000 i (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31; MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 13) 2. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -273 - PARTIAL VACATION OF BOSTON STREET AND BALTIMORE AVENUE (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 11471 — RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (c) DANCE PERMIT FOR 2000 POLKA FESTIVAL AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIR GROUNDS ON JUNE 8-10,2000 (d) SHORT -TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ON AUGUST 22, 2000 (e) APPOINTMENT OF SUSAN MARTI TO CIVIL SERVICE POLICE COMMISSION (f) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 00-01; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SANITARY SEWER - PHASE 1: ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11476 —RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - MAY 23, 2000 ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11477 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00-02; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER - PHASE 2: ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11478 -RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT ➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11479 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: (g) LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY HOERNEMANN TRUST (SECTION 7 OF HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11482) (h) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11483) 7 (i) REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM R -1 TO C -4 LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -274 AND SET SECOND READING FOR NNE 12, 2000) (j) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 4 -LOT SUBDIVISION LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY NIENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11484) (k) REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S THIRD ADDITION FROM R -1 TO R -2 AND R -3 AS REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 AND SET SECOND READING FOR NNE 12, 2000) (1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT UTILITY TRANSMISSION LINE IN FLOODWAY (SECTION 8 OF HASSAN VALLEY) AS REQUESTED BY HUTCHINSON . UTILITIES COMMISSION WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDTAION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11485) (m) REZONING FROM IIC TO R -2 (106 MONROE STREET SE) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY'S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -276 AND SET SECOND READING FOR NNE 12, 2000) (n) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE HIGHER THAN 30" S IN FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 795 COLORADO STREET AS 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — MAY 23, 2000 REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11486) (o) VARIANCE CONSTRUCT OFFICE ADDITION NUCHIGGANSTREET SE WHICH DOES NOT MEET REQUIRED SETBACK OF 30 FEET AS REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11487) (p) VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 945 FIFTH AVENUE SE AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD MCCLURE WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11488) (q) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING WITHIN FLOODWAY OF SOUTH FORK OF CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY CITY OF HUTCHINSON WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11489) (r) LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW AS REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11490) Action — Motion to approve consent agenda (a) ASSESSMENT HEARING ON ROLL NO. 5039, LETTING NO. 6; PROJECTS NO. 99 -20, 00 -09, 00-12 THROUGH 00-14, 00 -16 THROUGH 00 -19 Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 11480 & No. 11481 flooffrITS LZI I L6 1 4,13 m ' Y re► m (a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING NEW BID OPENING DATE OF JULY 17, 2000 AT 5:30 P.M. FOR CITY/RURAL SHARED RESCUE VEHICLE Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve 8. NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve sale 0 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — MAY 23, 2000 (b) CONSIDERATION OF CITY'S VISION STATEMENT AND CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENTS Action - 9. IMSCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 11. 4 MINUTES • REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2000 Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jim Haugen, John Mlinar, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. 2. Reverend Randy Chrissis presented the invocation. 3. MINUTES The minutes of the bid opening of May 2, 2000 were approved as presented. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2000 2. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 24, 2000 3. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT FOR ARIL 2000 . 4. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL 6, 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31; MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR MAY 23) 2. ORDINANCE NO. 00-271 - ANNEXATION REQUEST BY KDUZXKJR FOR 3.10 ACRES AND CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR 15.18 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION 30 OF HUTCHINSON TOWNSHIP (20132 HWY. 15 N.) (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 3. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -272 - MORATORIUM ON CELLULAR AND RADIO TOWERS TO UPDATE AND REVISE EXISTING PORTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 4. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -273 - SALE OF HCDC PROPERTY TO RASKE BUILDING CENTER (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 5. RESOLUTION NO. 11462 — RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE (c) RETAIL "OFF SALE" 3.2 BEER LICENSE FOR BUDGET MOBIL . (d) PEDDLERS LICENSE FOR GLEN KADELBACH, D.B.A. COUNTRY QUALITY MEATS INC. J, CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 9, 2000 • (e) LICENSES FOR POLKA FEST AT FAIR GROUNDS ON JUNE 8-10,2000 > "ON SALE" 3.2 BEER LICENSE > TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR SET -UPS (f) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS WAL =MART ADDITION TO HUTCHINSON • DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT • PARTIAL VACATION OF BOSTON STREET AND BALTIMORE AVENUE (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE AND SET SECOND READING FOR MAY 23, 2000) • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (ADOPT RESOLUTION 11452) • FINAL PLAT (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11453) 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE REQUESTED BY AMCON BLOCK/MARSHALL CONCRETE PRODUCTS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11463) (g) CONFINEMENT OF EASEMENT, ROLLING MEADOWS SUBDIVISION (h) LETTING NO. 9, PROJECT NO. 00-23 — ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5038 • RESOLUTION NO. 11464 - RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT • RESOLUTION NO. 11465 - RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT • RESOLUTION NO. 11466 -RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT • RESOLUTION NO. 11467 -RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT (i) LETTING NO. 6, PROJECTS 99 -20, 00-09, 00 -12 THROUGH 14, 00 -16 THROUGH 19 > RESOLUTION NO. 11468 - RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT > RESOLUTION NO. 11469 - RESOLUTION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the consent agenda except for 4- (b)-1 and 4-(g). Motion unanimously carved. Item 4 -(b) -1 — Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to continue to the next City Council meeting. Motion unanimously carved. Item 4-(g) — The City Engineer explained the easement. Motion by Peterson, second by Hagen to approve the easement. Motion unanim ously carried. PITRi I F RINC —NONE Iulul \I 1► 1 1 .►r Y11 (a) RECOGNITION OF C � PHOTOS TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 9, 2000 A representative from SRF Consultants presented Mayor Torgerson, Commissioner Grant Knutson of McLeod County and Dave Johnston of Hutchinson MN/DOT with framed aerial photos of the TH 22 Hutchinson East Bypass that were taken in November 1999. Dave Skaar and Bernie Knutson of the Civil Air Patrol were also recognized for taking the photograph for SRF Consultants. (b) FOLLOW -UP ON FINAL REPORT RECEIVED FROM COMMUNITY NEEDS TASK FORCE — JOHN PAULSEN John Paulsen, former member of the Community Needs Task Force, approached the City Council to inquire if any further consideration had been given to the final report on the City survey results. He reminded the Council that the Task Force did not want the report to be "shelved" and forgotten. Peterson suggested that a workshop be held to study and review the final report. Mlinar assured Paulsen that the report had not been forgotten, and he noted that its content surfaced at various meetings. (a) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO GAME AND FISH LICENSE AGENT . AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Motion by Mlinar, second by Hoversten to approve the agreement and adopt Resolution No. 11470. Motion unanimously carved. (b) CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM CITY SOLID WASTE COMMITTEE TO NARROW COLLECTION HAULERS TO THREE AND BEGIN NEGOTIATIONS Plotz reported that four haulers submitted request for proposals on April 17, 2000. Then the City Finance Director summarized the cost proposals for each hauler. It is the recommendation of the City Solid Waste Committee to negotiate with three fmalists, namely: Waste Management, Superior Service and Witte Sanitation. Rodeberg stated that damage to the street would go up with the additional weight of the vehicle. He inquired if the cost would be raised to compensate for the street damage. Motion by Hoversten, second by Mlinar to approve narrowing the bids down to three finalists and begin negotiations. Motion unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF FACILITTING OST OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN LOCA ONION OF HUTCHINSON U.S. Christie Rock, Director of Economic Development, gave a presentation on starting a process of retaining the U.S. Hutchinson post office in the downtown area. She 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 9, 2000 proposed to send a draft letter to the post office officials. Since the City wanted to 1W keep the facility in the downtown area, we would advise them how Hutchinson could assist in the process. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve sending the proposed letter to U.S. Post Office officials to recommend retaining the Hutchinson post office in a downtown location. Motion unanimously carved. (d) CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES The City Engineer stated that since different consultants were used for different projects, the choice was based on qualifications and the areas they specialize in. He requested authorization to secure proposals for general engineering consulting services. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve advertising for RFP for general engineering consulting services. Motion unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR SPECIAL MEETING ON JUNE 6, 2000 REGARDING LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO. 00-20 (SOUTH GRADE ROAD SW) Due to a time crunch to complete the project by fall, Rodeberg requested a special City Council meeting on June 6, 2000 to award the bid for Letting No. 7, Project No. 00-20. He noted the bids would be opened on June 5, 2000. • Motion by Peterson, second by Mlinar to approve a special meeting on June 6, 2000 at 5:00 p.m. Motion unanimously carried. em13 1 fYy 04 41Ma R811f.Y (a) COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTATION BY FINANCE DIRECTOR REGARDING AMENDED ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5031 FOR THE HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL PROPERTY Kenneth B. Merrill presented amended assessment rolls No. 5031 for Letting No. 7, Project No. 99 -10 and roll No. 5036 for Letting No. 9, Project No. 98 -18. He informed the City Council that the dollar amount had not changed; however, the method of assessment was divided out differently. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve the amended assessments and to adopt Resolutions No. 11474 and No. 11475. Motion unanimously carried. 2. REPORT BY CITY ADMINISTRATOR 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 9, 2000 Plotz reminded the City Council of a workshop on May 23, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. regarding capital improvement planning. He also suggested setting a workshop date for the end of August to review the Community Needs Task Force final report on the survey. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to set a City Council workshop on August 22, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. and continue the workshop after the regular City Council meeting. Motion unanimously carried. The City Administrator suggested changing the June 13, 2000 regular City Council meeting to June 12, 2000 inasmuch as the League of Minnesota Cities Conference will commence on the evening of June 13. Motion by Hoversten, second by Mlinar to change the City Council meeting to June 12, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to set a City Council workshop for June 12, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. Motion unanimously carried. The Council Members were reminded of the Board of Review scheduled for 4:30 p.m. on May 10, 2000 in the Council Chambers. 3. REPORT BY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Rodeberg reported that the Chamber of Commerce plans to install a fountain in the Crow River. He was approached with a request that the City provide electrical lighting on the fountain. The approximate cost would be $2,200 a year from April to October with the lights on 16 hours per day. It was the consensus of the City Council that the Kiwanis or some other civic/social group should fund the fountain lighting. �• "40 1X618 V a Zvdo l ►Y (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve the verified claims A and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Haugen, second by Mtinar to approve the verified claims B and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion carried with Hoversten abstaining from voting. CITY COUNCEL MINUTES — MAY 9, 2000 1 1:►luI There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, April 18, 2000 1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Jason Olsen, Dean Kirchoff, Dave Westlund, Jim Haugen, Brandon Fraser and Jeff Jones. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of PlanningBuildingiZoning; Holly Kreft, Planning Coordinator and Marc Sebora, City Attorney. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Haugen moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A VARIANCE TO PLACE A SECONDARY POLE SHED WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE SETBACK FROM THE SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER AS REQUESTED BY DEANE AND MAXINE DIETEL (845 2 ND AVE SE) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:31 p.m. with the reading of publication #6145 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, Apnl 6, 2000. Ms. Wischnack presented the request and layout of the existing and proposed buildings. She explained that the request was actually for three variances and a conditional use permit. The three requests are variances from the setback of the Crow River, setback from the bluff and allowance of more than one accessory building. The conditional use permit is required for the construction of a pole building. Staff recommends denial of the requests as presented, but did offer two options. Those options would include either removing the existing garage and building a larger garage that met the setbacks or attaching a garage to the house. Ms. VYschnack stated that there was an area of approximately 40' width, which would meet all setbacks. Mr. Kirchoff asked if the proposed building was outside of the 100 -year floodplain. Ms. Wischnack stated that it was. Mr. Dietel stated that he was living at the site during the 1965 flood event and the water did not come near his buildings. He added that the lot was almost 440' long. The Commission questioned if the building could be moved east to meet the setbacks. Mr. Dietel replied that it could not because extensive filling had been done in that area and that it would be a potential site for a new home. Mr. Olsen asked if he had explored the cost of the options presented by staff. Mr. Dietel stated that he had not nor would he. Mr. Fraser questioned if the proposed building could be moved further north. Mr. Dietel replied that it could but it would then encroach into an existing grove of trees. Mr. Haugen asked if there was a buildable area. Ms. Wischnack reiterated that there was a swath of approximately 40' that would be buildable with some earthwork. Mr. Jones questioned what the comprehensive land use plan indicated for this area. Ms. Wischnack stated that she was unsure as to the exact designation but was confident that industrial did not extend to the east side of the Crow River. Mr. Jones moved to close the hearing at 5:48 p.m. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the three variance requests and the conditional use permit with the conditions that the building may not exceed 16 feet in height, the building must be constructed above the 100 year flood elevation, and that items, currently stored outside, must be stored in the new structure. Ms. Wischnack suggesting adding the condition that the building must match the color of the principal structure, as has been required with other pole type buildings. Mr. Kirchoff added this condition to his motion. Mr. Fraser seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the above listed conditions passed 5 -2 with Mr. Haugen and Mr. Jones voting against. Minutes Planning Commission — April 18, 2000 Page 2 b) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER AND A FINAL PLAT AS REQUEST BY WAL -MART STORES INC. (BOSTON AND BALTIMORE) Chairman Arndt opened the heanng at 5:55 p.m. with the reading of publication #6148 for the condiboo use permit as published in the Hutchinson Leader an Thursday, April 6. 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request for a conditional use permit and a final plat. She updated the Commission as to the conditions of the preliminary plat and the status of those conditions. She explained that the vacation would not be finalized until the final plat is approved by the City Council. She also added that the right -of -way needed for Market Street is currently owned by the Fair Board, and that staff was working with them to purchase this. She stated that the stone water pond was revised to meet concerns staff had about flooding of the Clock Tower Plaza. Mr. Arndt asked what the depth of the pond would be. The engineer stated that it would approximately four feet deep. Ms. Wischnack added that this area was historically a low area, but that Wail -Mart had received a Certificate of Exemption from Roger Berggren, McLeod County Environmentalist. Ms. Wischnack stated that the plat designated a lease area in the southeast comer. She stated that it did not meet the lot size requirements, but that as long as it was not platted and only leased, it did not have lot size requirements. Mr. Arndt asked if the proposed Boston Street would be one block in kmVth. Ms. Wischnack replied that it would. Ms. Wischnack updated the Commission as to the status of the drainage ditch. She added that a consultant would be retained by the City to study the feasibility of filling the ditch and utilizing either a culvert or tile system. Rick Alben, owner of Champion Auto, questioned if he would have two access points after the reconstruction of the streets. Ms. Wischnack stated that this could be coordinated with the Engineering Department. Mr. Westlund moved to dose the hearing for the conditional use permit request at 6:13 p.m. Mr. Kirch seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Westiund moved to approve the conditional use permit with staff recommendations. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the condition that if the use changes or expands the permit must be amended carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve the final plat with staff recommendations and the additional condition that staff will work with Champion Auto to maintain two accesses. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the following conditions: the applicant must execute the subdivider's agreement prior to commencement of construction, the applicant must hold a preconstruction meeting with the City, the City must obtain a deed to the property for the street prior to work commencing on Market Street, the applicant must execute a maintenance agreement, and staff will work with Champion Auto to maintain two access points carried unanimously. Mr. Arndt questioned if there would be angled parking. The engineer stated that in the main parking lot it would be with 90 parking in the peripheral lots. c) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A DRIVE -UP BANK FACILITY AS REQUESTED BY CITIZENS BANK (NORTH OF EDMONTON AVE AND WEST OF TH 15) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:17 p.m. with the reading of publication #6149 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000- Ms. Kreft explained the request and location of the satellite office. She stated that the main floor would be the main banking area with the second floor being used as lease space. She added that the original plans indicated a two -way street at the southern entrance. Staff had concerns that the turning rim would not be feasible and therefore recommended that this entrance be made an eastbound one- moutes Planning Commission - April 18, 2000 Page 3 Jeffrey Pfilipsen of HTG Architects explained the project and presented a rendition of the proposed building. Mr. Jones questioned if all three facilities would be remain open. Tim Ulrich of Citizen's Bank stated that the south bank facility would be relocated to the proposed site. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 6:20 p.m. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve with the conditions that construction shall meet plans submitted on April 4, 2000 with one additional parking space to be located on the southeast comer of the building site and that the Summit Ash trees shall be changed to Black Ash species and Norway Maple to Common Hackberry as recommended by the City Forester. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the above conditions carried unanimously. d) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIAL (EXISTING USE) AS REQUESTED BY AMCON BLOCK INC (311 Hwy 7 EAST) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 7:12 p.m. with the reading of publication #6151 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request and that a conditional use permit had never been obtained for the outdoor storage. She listed the sections of the Ordinance which address outdoor storage and displayed photographs of the site. Ms. VVischnack also listed the proposed staff recommendations. Mr. Arndt questioned if the trees were on property owned by Amcon Block. Ms. Wischnack replied that they were and that there maybe property line issues. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if the sale of property was complete. Ms. Wischnack stated that to her understanding it would not be completed until the conditional use permit was obtained. David Pederson, president of Amcon Block, stated that the property had been surveyed this morning and that the west lot line was actually approximately 40 feet further west than first believed. Mr. Pederson indicated the area of the tile inlet. He added that there had been some repair done to the intake last fall and that a berm and silt fencing had been constructed at that time. Ms. Wischnack read a letter that a neighboring property owner had written regarding the dust issues along 6"' Avenue NE. Mr. Pederson stated that issues had been remedied last fall when that access had been barricaded. June Redman, 255 Hwy 7 East. stated that she felt the conditional use permit was not necessary because the plant had been in existence for so long. Mr. Arndt questioned her as to the existence of the ponds located in the northern portion of the property. She stated that they been in existence for many years. Bernadine Telecky, 321 Hwy 7 East, stated that there was often plastic and other materials that would cross into her property. She added that she would like to see a fence constructed. Clint Megard, 262 6" Avenue NE, stated that he had concems with the construction of a fence adjacent to his property because the entrance would then need to be moved. He stated that by moving the gate, access would be restricted to his garage and driveway. Mr. Jones questioned 0 the conditions along 6^ Avenue had improved. He stated that they had since ready mix trucks were no longer utilizing this route. Jay Miller, President of Marshall Concrete and potential owner, stated that the constriction of an interior fence, as recommended by staff, surrounding the block piles was not feasible for access to the block. Mr. Arndt questioned him as to the area needed for block storage. Mr. Miller replied that approximately 12 acres would be needed for block storage. Ms. Wischnack questioned if an approximate timeline could be set for removal of the scrap material. Mr. Miller stated that it could possibly be done by the • end of next season. Mr. Miller stated that they would reopen the access to 6 Avenue since a majority of the raw material would be transported from the northwest. Mr. Arndt questioned rf Marshall Concrete had plans to also do ready mix concrete. Mr. Miller stated that it was not in their plans at this time. Mr. Haugen Minutes Planning Commission - ADM 18. 2000 Page 4 questioned the timeframe of this transaction and what effect tabling the request would have. Mr. Miller stated that tabling the request would not be in the best interest of the purchase. Mr. Olsen asked if the only condition recommended by staff that would not be feasible would be intenor fence requirement. Mr. Miller replied that was the only requirement not feasible. Mr. Westlu questioned if Mr. Miller felt that the fence requirement was feasible. Mr. Miller stated that he did feel it was feasible if limited to those areas adjacent to residentially zoned areas. John Fisher, General Manager of Marshall Concrete Products, discussed the screening issues and felt that the neighbors would want to comment on the placement of the fence since there are boundary line discrepancies. He added that he did not feel that a long term clean up should be attached to the conditional use permit. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 7:12 p.m. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jones moved to approve the conditional use permit including the following conditions: the owners agree to install a fence (where needed to provided screening) along the western boundary of the property to effectively screen the outdoor storage of materials from the Residential Zoning Boundary (western property line) required in Section 10.01 Screening; all items currently stored on the site which are not connected to the primary use of the property (i.e. inoperable machinery shall be stored in the designated area or removed from the site; the owners submit any environmental information concerning the property; compliance with any regulation regarding filling of wetland areas (if found to be in violation). This may occur by the owner agreeing to a certain time line for compliance; and compliance with any requests for drainage reconstruction. The request would not be placed on the City Council's agenda until a dean up plan would be submitted. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion to approve with above listed conditions carded unanimously. e) CONSIDERATION OF ANNEXATION REQUEST BY LARRY GRAF OF KDUZ/KKJR FOR 3.10 ACA& AND THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FOR 15.18 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION 30 OF HUTCHIN TOWNSHIP (20132 HWY 15 N) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 7:25 p.m. with the reading of publication #6147 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000. Ms. Kraft displayed the location of the area proposed to be annexed. She explained that KDUZ/KKJR is needed of receiving City sewer services and since the City owned property adjacent to the request, this property is also proposed to be annexed. Larry Graf, President and General Manager of KDUZ/KKJR, reiterated that the property was in need of City sewer. Ms. Kreft explained that since this was less than 60 acres it could be annexed by ordinance. Mr. Kirchoff moved to close the hearing at 7:27 p.m. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion carded unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously. f) CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO GRADE AND FILL IN THE FLOODPLAIN FOR CONSTRUCTION POLE BUILDINGS IN THE VC DISTRICT AS REQUESTED BY CARLIE KARG (546 AND 579 2" AVE SE) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 7:28 p.m. with the reading of publication #6150 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request and location of the proposed projects. She stated that A Street north of 2" Avenue had been vacated in 1999. She added that the projects were on two separate lots and that grading and filling would need to be done on Lots 3 and 4. v,,.wtes Planning Commission — April 18. 2000 Page 5 Mr. Kirchoff questioned why the building on Lot 10 of Block 21 was so much higher than other buildings and if it was necessary to build it at this height. Ms. Wischnack stated that sometimes buildings were built at a higher elevation, but that is was not always necessary. Ms. Kathy Lindblom, 216 Huron Street SE, raised a number of questions regarding the proposed project. She stated that she would like a privacy fence built to protect her children from trucks. She added that the shed on their property is only one foot from the property line. Mr. Karg stated that he would be willing to split the costs of such a project. Ms. Lindblom also stated that she would Ike at least a ten -foot setback for the proposed building maintained. Ms. Wischnack replied that the survey does curreritty have a setback of ten feet. Ms. Lindblom stated that currently trucks are parked blocking their driveway and displayed photographs. Mr. Karg stated that he had proposed to set back the building 60 feet from Huron Street to allow for enough room for the trucks to park and back into the lot. Ms. Lindblom also questioned if there would be set hours for loading and unloading and if assessments will increase because of increased truck traffic. She also added that people are often rummaging through the garbage of the current businesses to find discarded chip bags. Mr. Karg stated he would be willing to pay for the costs of utilizing a locked dumpster. Mr. Kirchoff questioned if Mr. Karg knew what use the proposed building in question would be. Mr. Karg stated that he had not yet decided if it would be used as lease space to a distributor or for his own septic installation business. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 7:46 p.m. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve with staff conditions and an additional condition that the dumpster be locked. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Mr. Haugen amended the motion to also include that a fence, decided upon by both neighbors, be constructed and that a locked dumpster be in place before occupancy of the building. Motion to approve included the following conditions: the permit is valid for 6 months (if a building permit has not been requested within that period, the applicant must request an extension prior to expiration); the buildings must be constructed as proposed on the site plan, additionally, grading must also be constructed as proposed, the applicant must meet with the City Engineer prior to commencement of construction; the parking areas for the buildings must be paved prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for the buildings; no outside storage is allowed; building plans must be signed by a structural engineer; a locked dumpster must in place prior to occupancy of the building; and a fence, decided on by the property owners, shall be constructed. Motion carried unanimously. g) CONSIDERATION I INSTEAD OF REQU RED 6') AND CONSTRUCT DETACHED GARAGE GE WITH DRIVEWAY (3 TB SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS INSTEAD OF REQUIRED 6') AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD AND BARBARA PETERSON (24 GROVE STREET NW) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 7:55 p.m. with the reading of publication #6152 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request for three variances. She displayed photographs showing the existing home and proposed location for the garage and shed. She stated that the existing setback for the home is approximately 2.5 feet. The required setback is six feet. The proposed setbacks for the detached garage and shed is three feet. The required setbacks are also six feet for these structures. Ms. Wischnack explained that staff recommended a three foot setback for the addition to meet the requirements of the Building Code. She explained that the Building Code allowed for walls to be set back three feet with a one foot overhang into the setback, but that staff recommended that the entire • addition be placed outside the three foot setback. She also added that staff recommended denial of the variances for the garage and shed. Minutes Planning Commission - April 18, 2000 ?age 6 Mr. Peterson stated that they would be willing to construct the addition with the three foot setback and the allowance of the one foot overhang. He added that the staff recommendation would make the proposed addtion too narrow to be feasible. He stated that due to the small size of the lot, it would difficult to meet required setbacks for the garage. Mr. Richard Barrett, 415 Washington Avenue West, introduced himself as a neighbor of the Peterson's. He stated that he had no objections to the request. Mr. Jones moved to close the hearing at 8:31 p.m. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. The motion carved unanimously. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the requests for variances with the following conditions: construct the addition onto the home at least 3 feet from the northern property line with no more than a one foot overhang; the driveway must be five feet from the property line; and grading for the driveway and garage must address drainage to the neighboring property, which is slightly below this home. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the above listed conditions carried unanimously. i) CONSIDERATION OF A MORATORIUM ON CELLULAR AND RADIO TOWERS IN ORDER TO UPDATE AND REVISE THE EXISTING PORTION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 8:26 p.m. with the reading of publication #6153 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, April 6, 2000. Staff explained the process of adopting the moratorium. Staff recommended a moratorium of four months from the adoption of the ordinance. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 8:32 p.m. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. The motion carved unanimously. Mr. Westund moved to recommend adoption of a moratorium on all new telecommunication t a period of not more than four months. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS a) EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUESTED BY PAXTON ANDERSON Ms. Wischnack explained the request and stated that the extension would be for a time period of six months. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the extension. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion carved unanimously. OLD BUSINESS Discussion was held relative to enforcement of banner signs on Main Street. 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF Ms. Kreft presented the tentative agenda for May. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. • HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE • ANNUAL BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING — April 18, 2000 Hospital — Conference Room A/B — 5:30 PM Present Paulette Slanga, Chairperson; Steven Snapp, Secretary; Pastor Randy Chrissis, Trustee; Duane Hoversten, Trustee; Wayne Fortun, Trustee; Dr. Jim Allen, Chief of Staff/Trustee. Absent: Bob Peterson, Vice Chairperson ( excused) Others Present Phil Graves, President; Robyn Erickson, Care and Program Support Division Director, Jane Lien, Acute Care Division Director; Pat Halverson, Community Care Programs and Services; Pam Larson, Finance, Information and Material Services Division Director, Linda Krentz, Bums Manor Nursing Home Administrator; Elaine Schermann, Quality Consultant; Tom O'Connor, Vice President, Regional Health Services; Gary Plotz, City Administrator, Gordon Sprenger, CEO, Allina Health System; Jim Lammers, Facility Planners, and Corrinne Schlueter, Recorder. Chairperson Slanga called the meeting to order at 5:40 PM. Gordon Sprenger, Chief Executive Officer, from Allina Health Systems attended the meeting and provided a current update on the activities of Allina and described his transitioning role within the next year. David Strand, has been appointed as Chief Operating Officer of Allina Health System, effective May 1, 2000, and as Gordon Sprenger's successor as Chief Executive Officer effective July 1, 2001. Sprenger provided a 20- minute presentation on the work force and the problems health care is facing in the future as a result of the shortage of personnel. In addition he discussed the positive relationship that Allina enjoys with Hutchinson Area Health Care. He emphasized the breakthroughs in information technology and the impact of the internet on health care delivery. He discussed alternative medicine, the opinions of the health care consumer on the current delivery models as well as the influence of consumerism in the design of future models of care. I. Minutes of Past Meetings. The minutes of the March 21, 2000 were presented and discussed. • Following discussion, motion was made by Chrissis, seconded by Fortun to approve the minutes of the March 21, 2010, meeting. All were in favor. Motion carried. U. Medical Staff Meeting Minutes and Credentialing Dr. Allen reported on the activities of the Medical Staff Executive Committee. The credential files Dr. • Heather Hollender, Dr. Mark Hagberg, Lynn Artibee, and William Goodmanson Board of Directors Meetings — April 18, 2 .000 Page two were reviewed for initial reappointment. Credentialing recommendations were made for the following practitioners: Heather Hollender, MD Plastic Surgery Courtesy Mark Hagberg, MD ER Courtesy Lynn Artibee, CNM Allied Health Independent William Goodmanson CRNA Allied Health Dependent Reappointments• Douglas Drake, MD Orthopedic Active David Gesensway, MD Orthopedic Active Jay Johnson, MD Orthopedic Active Leslie Johnson Ortho Tech Allied Health Dependent Marc Pritzker, MD Cardiologist Courtesy Samuel Scholl, MA, EdS. LP Allied Health Dependent Gregory Wagman Ortho Tech Allied Health Dependent Joseph Wang DDS Allied Health Independent • r o ll ; 1 I ' • Z' i.. 1 1 Resianations: Dr. David Pollak Psychiatry Courtesy Dr. Kent Bentzin ER Active Dr. Kyusil Choi Anesthesiology Active • Following discussion, motion was made by Snapp, seconded by Hoversten, to grant membership and privilege to the above listed practitioners as recommended by the Executive Committee of the Medical Staff. All were in favor. Motion carried. III. Old Business, A. Plaza 15 Purchase. Graves provided an update on the current activities regarding the possible purchase of the Plaza 15 shopping center. He informed the Board about the appraisal presently being updated by the Robinson firm from Mankato. Gary Plotz, City Administrator provided an update on the one million dollars included in the State Bonding Bill. Plotz stated language was amended in the bill to include "acquiring and remodeling" of property. The original bill was to construct, remodel, and equip The next steps in the process will be to appoint a Board of Directors Meetings — April 18, 2000 . Page three small group of board members, City Council members, along with staff to continue to work on this project, along with legal council and Bill Able, from Colliers/ Towle Realty. The members appointed from the Hospital Board are Bob Peterson and Duane Hoversten. The alternate is Steven Snapp. IV. New Business, A. Facilities Planning Services. Lammers reported he started meeting with the managers and supervisors of the service areas in March. The list of requests was narrowed to four or five areas that needed remodeling or repair. They are Surgery, Radiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Room, and the Nursing Home. The space concerns in the areas are identified as follows: • A fourth room for surgery is needed to accommodate the increased demand for Orthopedics. • The Endoscopic procedure room needs to be expanded for patient privacy as well as for treatment space. • The needs of the Surgery waiting area as well as Post Anesthesia Care needs expansion. • The Intensive Care Unit is undersized and inadequate for the current requirements for care as well as for the efficient functioning of staff. • Space needs to be constructed for a new fixed MRI unit. • Waiting and patient receiving needs to be addressed in the are of Emergency Services as well as Radiology and Laboratory. • The Dining Room as well as the Kitchen at BMNH needs to be expanded. Fundamental questions need to be addressed regarding the Nursing Home such as: current location, the requirements of the residents today as well as into the future, availability of more private rooms, the current bathrooms needing to be handicap accessible, and the ability with the current space to sufficiently address these needs. • Medical Records needs to be expanded and consolidated from four storage locations into one. • Pharmacy space needs to be relocated and expanded. • Materials Services (Purchasing) needs to be expanded. • Business office space needs to be remodeled and expanded. • Outpatient Mental Health space needs to be expanded. Lammers discussed the next steps in the planning process. He provided a project estimate of 57,000,000 to address these expansion and remodeling requirements. B. ATM Machine There were four lending institutions in Hutchinson that responded to our bid process. We are recommending First Federal for the following reasons: there will be no monthly charge, rental income to Hutchinson • Area Health Care is proposed at 10 cents per transaction for the first 400 monthly ATM transactions. If transactions exceed this amount there will be an increase in Board of Directors Meetings — April 18, 2000 Page four the per transaction income back to HAHC, (to be negotiated at that point). All other bidders proposed something less favorable. • Following discussion, motion was made by Fortun, seconded by Chrissis to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Fast Federal bid. All were in favor. Motion carried. C. Ambulance Replacement The board reviewed a capital expenditure request to replace the 1989 Ford ambulance with a new ambulance. One of the reasons is to ensure reliability of fleet for optimal patient care. The 1994 ambulance has 94,000 miles so would like to move it to third rotation to slow down the rate of miles added to it. 1989 ambulance has 110,000 miles on it, and the new ambulances are more up-to -date in regards to infection control features, more user - friendly (patient friendly) features such as noise control and ride comfort, and space consideration for patient care equipment and supplies. • Following discussion, motion was made by Snapp, seconded by Hoversten to approve the authorization to bid a new ambulance. All were in favor. Motion carried. D. Legal Counsel Graves reported in the past we have had two firms providing legal work on the mall purchase (the Dorsey firm; and Arnold, Anderson, and Dove). The Arnold Anderson and Dove firm has agreed to provide the work on the Mall at $120 per hour, not to exceed $10,000. • Following discussion, motion was made by Hoversten, seconded by Allen to engage the services of the Arnold, Anderson, and Dove firm at a fee of $120 an hour, with a cap of $10,000. All were in favor. Motion carved. Lawn Tractor Replacement. The board reviewed a capital expenditure request for a replacement lawn tractor for BMNH The current unit has 1500+ hours on it. The engine is weak and bums excessive oil. The replacement will be the same as the unit at the hospital, and some attachments will be shared. • Following discussion, motion was made by Fortun, seconded by Chrissis, to approve the purchase of a tractor for either a leasing plan or purchase. All were in favor. Motion carried. F. First Quarter Strategic Plan. The fast quarter Strategic Plan report was presented by Graves and the Division Directors. Highlights consisted of recruitment of family physicians, recruitment of psychiatrists, and our goal is to improve the • health of our population in zip code 55350. Board of Directors Meetings — April 18, 2000 Page five Following discussion, motion was made by Chrissis, seconded by Allen, to approve the first quarter strategic plan as presented. All were in favor. Motion carried. G. Compliance. Slanga reported to the board about the Organization Compliance Plan and a letter that she will sign, along with Graves, to emphasize the importance of the standards of conduct for HAHC. She requested that board members receive, review and become familiar with the contents of the "Employee Standards of Conduct" handout. Organizational Reports. A. President. Nothing further to report, B. Acute Care Programs and Services. Nothing further to report. C. Care and Program Support Services The Board Retreat is scheduled for September 7'" and 8 at Riverwood at Monticello. It will begin at 5:00 PM on September 7' and adjourn following lunch on September 8 Erickson announced there will be a Job Fair on May 12 at the Mall in Hutchinson. D. Community Care Prog1 y, ms and Services Nothing further to report. E. Senior Care Report Nothing further to report. Qualit Rpprt Schermann reported they have received word from JCAHO regarding the Laboratory Survey. One Type I was issued and is in the process of appeal. The Bums Manor Recruitment and Retention Team are scheduled to report at the next board meeting. 4 1 11 WIRZI a I.• • - If - I ... I I . i . .. Accounts Payable The accounts payable and cash disbursements were presented for approval. • Following discussion, motion was made by Snapp, seconded by Fortun, to approve the accounts payable and cash disbursements, as listed, in the amount of $1,448,107.26. All were in favor. Motion carried. Statistics. The March statistics for admissions, newborns, emergency services, ambulance runs, radiology/ mammograms, same day surgical visits, inpatient surgical, average length of stay and cash mix were presented and discussed. Financial Report Larson reported the organization's financials for the month of March 2000, showed a net income of $201,785 compared to a budget of $143,044. Hospital Auxiliary Meeting Minutes, The Hospital Auxiliary meeting minutes were presented. No unusual comments were made. �� I Board of Directors Meetings — April 18, 2000 Page six 0 Bums Manor Auxiliary Meeting Minutes, The Bums Manor Auxiliary meeting minutes were presented. No unusual coments were made. Adioumment There being no further business, motion was made by Allen, seconded by Hoversten, to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:28 PM. Respectfully submitted, Corrinne Schlueter Steven Snapp Recorder Secretary �6 0 0 � J Smith Barney FNMA Smith Barney FNMA pass thru Prudential Fed Home Loan Citlzens Bank 29872 Citizens Bank Marquette Citizens Bank Braemer Firstate Federal 29860 29852 6.13% 03/10/99 03/10/06 7.50% 12/20/95 90381 CITY OF HUTCHINSON 6.00% 10/26/01 6.17% 04/13/00 CERTIF :'ATES OF DEPOSIT 05128/99 17- May -00 09 16 99 April 30, 2000 Date Date Interest Of Of Institution Description Rate Purchase Maturity Amount TREAS BONDS 644136 7.18% 12/12191 2/15/2001 364,500.00 Smith Barney GNMA 865M7 6.70% 9104/97 9/04/2002 200,000.00 Smith Barney 313400 S H 7 7.17% 04/03/00 04103/03 300,071.92 Smith Barney FHLB 3133m2 -u3 6.015% 02/05/98 02/05/03 300,000.00 Prudential pool 336914 7.226% 1231 96 0201 2026 168,935.62 Expected life 6.2 years (89,729.94) Smith Barney FNMA 6.100% 01 2098 01 2005 300,000.00 Prudentail pool 336399 7.270% 1231 96 0201 2026 161,617.93 Expected life 4.1 years (57,055.93) Citizens, Marquette 4.00% 04/25/96 06/01/2001 100,000.00 Firstate. First Minnesota Prudential Fed Home Laon 6.00% 01/28/98 07/28/03 200,000.00 Smith Barney FNMA Smith Barney FNMA pass thru Prudential Fed Home Loan Citlzens Bank 29872 Citizens Bank Marquette Citizens Bank Braemer Firstate Federal 29860 29852 6.13% 03/10/99 03/10/06 7.50% 12/20/95 90381 REPAYMENT 6.00% 10/26/01 6.17% 04/13/00 5.25% 05128/99 5.81% 09 16 99 29866 5.550% 90381 5.35% 6296 6.60% Prudential FHL 5.79% Call 2118/99 and therafter Marquette 6.29% Smith Barney Money Market 6.16% Firstate 6379 6.250% Marquette 5.95% Citizens Bank 297 5.850% Marquette 1231 ' 297 6.260% 08 1399 07 29 99 03 16 00 11 1898 0211 00 04 14 00 03 01 00 0211 00 02 10 00 01 2800 06/01/02 10/26/01 06/15/00 05131 /00 091300 081500 07 28 00 1. ri 11 1805 02 15 01 O6 09 00 072800 071300 06 15 00 01 3001 500,000.00 206,371.04 (144,201.10) 399,625.00 500,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400.000.00 .Ir IPI Ir 1 rr 1r 1rr r1 rr rrr 1r 1r rrr 1r rrr rrr rr 111 rrr r1 $9,995,709.30 4 -� 2000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 APRIL 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 APRIL REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL APRIL APRIL MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 154,370.67 (154,370.67) 0.00 1,852,448.00 1,852,448.00 0.00% LICENSES 4,395.00 2,860.00 2,883.33 (23.33) 21,025.00 34,600.00 13,575.00 60,77% PERMITS AND FEES 33,301.70 21,955.87 20,516.67 1,439.20 47,818.93 246,200.00 198,381.07 19.42% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,287.62 10,145.54 207,511.08 (197,365.54) 24,920.37 2,490,133.00 2,465,212.63 1 -00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 44,536.38 50,646.04 96,648.42 (46,002.38) 192,336.82 1,159,781.00 967,444.18 16.58% FINES 8 FORFEITS 4,390.12 4,389.35 5,000.00 (610.65) 14,94320 60,000.00 45,056.80 24.91% INTEREST 5,561.04 9,400.38 4,250.00 5,150.38 57,540.57 51,000.00 (6,540.57) 112.82% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 1,120.15 (64.43) 41.67 (106.10) 651.32 500.00 (151.32) 130.26% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 186,816.55 4,400.00 101,662.50 (97,262.50) 190,125.00 1,219,950.00 1,029,825.00 15.58% REIMBURSEMENTS 15,666.16 2,935.02 9,060.42 (6,125.40) 9,442.14 108,725.00 99,282.86 8.68% SALES 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 TOTAL 297,074.72 106,667.77 601,944.75 (495,276.98) 558,803.35 7,224,837.00 6,666,033.65 7.73% r� • 0 0 2000 CITY OF HUTCHINSON FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 APRIL 1999 2000 2000 2000 2000 APRIL EXPENSE REPORT - GENERAL APRIL APRIL MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED MAYOR & COUNCIL 3,472.20 4,598.90 4,983.25 (384.35) 15,045 %: 59,799.00 44,753.28 25,16% CITY ADMINISTRATOR 16,775.10 16,896.90 17,142.83 (245.93) 69,495.69 205,714.00 136,218.31 33.78% ELECTIONS 0.00 0.00 1,058.33 (1,058.33) 0.00 12,700.00 12,700.00 0.00% FINANCE 28,739.60 53,644.90 28,981.17 24,663.73 121,999.52 347,774.00 225,774.48 35.08% MOTOR VEHICLE 9,849.50 12,200.20 12,157.75 42.45 48,592.90 145,893.00 97,300.10 33.31% ASSESSING 0.00 0.00 2,758.33 (2,758.33) 0.00 33,100.00 33,100.00 0.00% LEGAL 8,238.60 7,766.00 7,708.33 57.67 31,103.76 92,500.00 61,396.24 33.63% PLANNING 9,072.10 10,212.00 10,048.58 163.42 39,502.59 120,583.00 81,080.41 32.76% INFORMATION SERVICES 9,072.10 6,362.60 5,140.17 1,222.43 17,541.60 61,682.00 44,140.40 28.44% POLICE DEPARTMENT 127,032.10 130,381.40 139,477.67 (9,096.27) 538,163.57 1,673,732.00 1,135,568 -43 32.15% SCHOOL LIAISON OFFICER 3,150.50 6.648.30 8,911.17 (2.262.87) 27,262.21 106,934.00 79,671.79 25.49% EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 10.70 10.70 333.33 (322.63) 89.49 4,000.00 3,910.51 2 24% SAFETY COUNCIL 250.00 0.00 20.83 (20.83) 0.00 250.00 250.00 000% FIRE DEPARTMENT 9,219.70 10,508.10 22,567.08 (12,058.98) 44,826.75 270,805.00 225,978.25 16.55% FIRE MARSHAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS 10,672.70 10,264.20 12,496.42 (2,232.22) 49,099.29 149,957.00 100,857.71 32.74% ENGINEERING 31,020.90 25.050.20 30,291.00 (5,240.80) 115,946.94 363,492.00 247,545.06 31.90% STREETS & ALLEYS 40,235.90 47,238.70 55,288.67 (8,049.97) 222,496.90 663,464.00 440,967.10 33.54% STREET MAINTENANCE A/C 8,306.40 10,023.40 8,735.00 1,288.40 77,796.27 104,820.00 27,023.73 74.22% CITY HALL 11,496.00 9,794.70 8,909.50 885.20 40,528.57 106,914.00 66,385.43 37.91% PARK/REC ADMIN. 10,867.30 10,892.40 13,155.33 (2,262.93) 49,089.88 157,864.00 108,774.12 31.10% RECREATION 8,895.10 11,798.80 18,371.83 (6,573.03) 49,821.21 220,462.00 170,640.79 22.60% SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER 6,631.70 5,585.90 8,556.92 (2,971,02) 25,643.01 102,683.00 77,039.99 24.97% CIVIC ARENA 11,454.90 21.537.20 19,960.67 1,576.53 111,591.03 239,528.00 127.936.97 40.59°% PARK DEPARTMENT 54,327.50 55,922.10 60,051.83 (4,129.73) 210,224.80 720,622.00 510,397.20 29.17% RECREATION BUILDING & POOL 5,128.60 5,671.60 8,539.17 (2,867.57) 33,414.34 102,470.00 69,055.66 32.61% LIBRARY 1,561.00 1,918.30 9,734.67 (7,816.37) 52,061.19 116,816.00 64,754.81 44.57% CEMETERY 5,145.70 18,700.20 8,227.50 10,472.70 33,924.12 98,730.00 64,805.88 34.36% DEBT SERVICE 700.00 0.00 7,806.08 (7,806.08) 4,704.50 93,673.00 88,968.50 5.02% AIRPORT 3,983.20 7,741.20 4,812.50 2,928.70 24,507.63 57,750.00 33,242.37 42.44% TRANSIT 8,144.20 16.30 0.00 16.30 31,151.63 0.00 (31,151.83) #DIV /01 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 #DIV /0! UNALLOCATED 81,060.70 14,714.70 65,843.83 (51,129.13) 71,679.83 790,126.00 718,446.17 9.07% TOTAL 524,514.00 516,099.90 602,069.75 (85,969.85) 2,157,305.14 7,224,837.00 5,067,531.86 29.86% t V� 2000 CITY Or HUTCHINSON rINANCIAL REPORT APRIL 1999 2000 2000 REVENUE REPORT - GENERAL APRIL APRIL MONTHLY OVER (UNDER) YEAR TO ADOPTED BALANCE ERCENTAGE MONTH MONTH BUDGET BUDGET DATE ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING USED TAXES 0.00 0.00 154,370.67 (154,370.67) 0.00 1,852,448.00 1,852,448.00 0.00% LICENSES 4,395.00 2,860.00 2,883.33 (23.33) 21,025.00 34,600.00 13,575.00 60.77% PERMITS AND FEES 33,301.70 21,955.87 20,516.67 1,439.20 47,818.93 246,200.00 196,381.07 19.42% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,287.62 10,145.54 207,511.08 (197,365.54) 24,920.37 2,490,133.00 2,465,212.63 1.00% CHARGES FOR SERVICES 44,536.38 50,646.04 96,648.42 (46,002.38) 192,336.82 1,159,781.00 967,444.18 16.58% FINES & FORFEITS 4,390.12 4,389.35 5,000.00 (610.65) 14,943.20 60,000.00 45,056.80 24.91 %, INTEREST 5,561.04 9,400.38 4,250.00 5,150.38 57,540.57 51,000.00 (6,540.57) 112.82% SURCHARGES - BLDG PERMITS 1,120.15 (64.43) 41.67 (106.10) 651.32 500.00 (151.32) 130.26% CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS 186,816.55 4,400.00 101,662.50 (97,262.50) 190,125.00 1.219,950.00 1,029,825.00 15.58% REIMBURSEMFNTS 15,666.16 2,935.02 9,060.42 (6,125.40) 9,442.14 106,725.00 99,282.86 8.68% SALES 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 %, TOTAL 297,074.72 106,667.77 601,944.75 (495,276.98) 558,803.35 7,224,837.00 6,666.033.65 7.73% General Govt. 96,715.20 121,476.20 98,888.25 22,587.95 383,810.35 1,186,659.00 802,848.65 32.34% Public Safety 150,335.70 157,812.70 183,806.50 (25,993.80) 659,441.31 2,205,678.00 1,546,236.69 29.90% Streets & Alleys 79,563.20 82,312.30 94,314.67 (12,002.37) 416,240.11 1,131,776.00 715,535.89 36.78% Parks & Recreation 98,866.10 113,326.30 138,370.42 (25,044.12) 531,845.46 1,660,445.00 1,128,599.54 32.03% Miscellaneous 99,033.80 41,172.40 86,689.92 (45,517.52) 165,967.91 1,040,279.00 874,311.09 15.95% TOTAL 524,514.00 516,099.90 602,069.75 (85,969.85) 2,157,305.14 7,224,837.00 5,067,531.86 29.86% PUBLICATION NO. 6173 ORDINANCE NO. 00 -273 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA FOR PARTIAL VACATION OF BOSTON STREET AND BALTIMORE AVENUE AND VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. That notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made, and it was made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to vacate a portion of Boston Street and Baltimore Avenue. SECTION 2. That certain street and public thoroughfares and drainage and utility easements in the City of Hutchinson located and described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATED STREETS: • That part of vacated Boston Street and Baltimore Avenue as dedicated in Paden First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota lying south of the westerly extension of the north line of Block 2, said Paden First Addition and lying west of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 4, said Block 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS: All the drainage and utility easements as dedicated in Lot 1, Block 3 and Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Paden First Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota. All the drainage and utility easements as dedicated in Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Wal -Mart Subdivision, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication and upon filing certified copy thereof with the proper County officers as required by law. Adopted by the City Council this 23 day of May, 2000. Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator Marlin Torgerson, Mayor 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11471 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES WHEREAS, The Director of Engineering and the Police Chief agree that the following areas have traffic control concerns which warrant traffic control devices, and; WHEREAS, the Hutchinson City Council has the authority to establish locations as points where traffic control devices shall be erected, pursuant to Section 7.04, Subdivision 1 of the Hutchinson City Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON: That the Council hereby establishes traffic control devices known as "NO PARKING," which shall be effective for the following locations: 1) On Century Avenue SW from Dale Street SW to T.H. 15. 2) On South Grade Road SW from School Road SW to Dale Street SW P Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 Date 8ubmtftd PlAnt be 4 weeks prior to dance date) , �7czoo • Nam - ofAppGcant ) 4ee j6A1rCkmQ1 - AddtW Ro. (� 1 L a( P rAt'ri•e Phone" SS3 S�f Ord WWon Name ZGO o p � �Ca e r a Address PWO Sao -S.7 -� Locaumtxftom- MCA C'�ouH Fa - 6 1 - cams DawsY 2{ a 9 4i ty e to end > l.Z'oo (Y1: do Hawow k< bead Yes No Have �/or Mndatkcs.in beNc�7- es No ElsevvCiet7e ?' S,tN No 0 LTORMSOANCEPERMIT 09/99 Signature of Applicant HABITAT FOR HDMMTY SHORT TERM City of Hutchinson FEE: = =3 APPLICATICN FOR GAMBLING DEVICES :.ICENSE Approved by: Building Fire Application shall be submitted at Police �Q least _ days prior to the Gambling o, VV c K /casiollnl I, f1Y111 (�G�� AND I, IV C1rIN - e(SS Name of Authorized Gfficer of :Jame of Designated Gambling Organization Manager Hereby submit in duplicate this application for a license to conduct the game ofgamblingin accordance with the provisions of the City of Hutchinson Ordinance NO. 655 ajid Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 for the license year ending Sigeatures: Authorized Officer of Organization Desi nate Gambling Manager of organization A. The following is to be completed by the duly authorized officer of the organization: 11�� �j 1. True Name: }�GUP.i� �C(}`�g " (last) /I (first) llII ��(middle) "f 2. Residence Address: I� �(,�I�Id)Q J`tUe N W I illll �R• street) (city) (state) (z p) 3 . :ate of Birth 4. Place of Birth l/ f4 �Qk M'q (mo /day /year) (city /state) 5. Have you ever been convi�ppted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No 7K • If Yes, explain B. The following is to be completed by the designated gambling manager of organization: ` f _ 5?7 1. True Name: 1�`e� �JS ' "Q nN 7?1 (last) / /� n(firls�Itl)I` (middle) 2. Residence Address: 1976 • J LLC I- ^ ' (street) (city) (stata� r(yzip)''''II 3. Date of Birth: / 4. Place of Birth: P lum G fy, Pal[) (mo /day /year) (city /stater - MAY 1 7 2000 a WWWAwn 5• Have you ever been convicted of any crime other than a traffic offense? Yes No '�,_. If yes, explain ID 6. How long have you been a member of the organization? 4% 7. Attach a copy of the official resolution or official action designating you gambling manager. C. Game Information: 1. Place where gambling devices will be used r6upd5 2. Date or dates gambling devices will be used S.1 [97) (date and /or day(s) 3. Hours of the day gambling devices will be used: of week) From A.M. To A.M. P.M. P. 14. 4. :Maximum number of players 5. Will prizes be paid in money or merchandise? yf/ 6. Will refreshments be served during the time the gambling devices will be used? Yes No ' _. If so, will a charge be made for such refreshments? Yes NO D. Organization Information: 1. Address where regular meetings MDA are � held 10 ?3 2. Day and time of meetings ,r ol e 3. Is the applicant organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota? Yes k No 4. How long has the organization been in existence? yL°Q�s 4a. How many members in the organization? A0 5. What is the purpose of the organization? 0 I S 6. Officers of the Organization: 0 r U) r-* FAmllle` Na ,�pp e 1 I Ad ess yy�� �� tle / fti\;'b �5ehwankg) qqq Orn 7. Give names of officers or any other persons paid for services to the organization: Name Address Title Organization :nformation: (Continued) 8. In whose II custody will or anization records be kept? Name - f�AN+a Er t�man� l C Ce Address a D Ful t5f k 9. If the organization carries sufficient insurance to compensate the players in the event any injury is sustained by players while gambling devices are used, or while on the licensed premises, please state the TT Name of Insurer Reoracm 1007 -CO• and Policy No. 10. Have you (Manager & Officer) read, and do you thoroughly understand the provisions of all laws, ordinances, and regulations governing the operation and use of,gambling devices? 11. Atta - a list of all activ me ber of th rga ization. Wei have, many volunfeuS Linda ; 6 ews E. The following information is provided concerning a fidelity bond given by the gambling manager in favor of the organization. 1. Name of bonding company 2. Address of bonding company • 3. Amount and duration of bond 4. Application is hereby made for waiver of the bonding requirements. Yes No I declare that the information I have provided on this application is truthful, and I authorize the City of Hutchinson to investigate the information submitted. Also, I have received from the City of Hutchinson a copy of the City Ordinance No. 655 relating to gambling, and I will familiarize myself with the cop -t*nLs thereof. S of authorized officer of organization Date: Subscribed and sworn to' before me a notary public on this day of , 19 Signaturp of Notary Public Commission expires on Subscribed and sworn to before me a notary public on this day of 19 Signature of Notary Public Commission expires on 0 - RESOLUTION NO. 11476 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 1 PROJECT NO. 00-01 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve: Project No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson St SE WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. Mayor City Administrator • 4 _F RESOLUTION NO. 11477 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 1 PROJECT NO. 00-01 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted May 23, 2000, the Director of Engineering has prepared a report with reference to the improvement of:: Project No. 00 -01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson St SE and said report was received by the Council on May 23, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to 4innesota Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of S 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 13th day of June, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 23rd day of May, 2000- Mayor City Administrator C • RESOLUTION NO. 11478 RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT LETTING NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 00 -02 WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve: Project No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson Street SE to West of TH 15 WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT, the proposed improvement be referred to the Director of Engineering for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. Mayor • City Administrator • RESOLUTION NO. 11479 RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT • LETTING NO. 2 PROJECT NO. 00-02 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council adopted May 23, 2000, the Director of Engineering has prepared a report with reference to the improvement of:: Project No. 00 -02 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson St SE to West of TH 15 and said report was received by the Council on May 23, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1, The Council will consider the improvements of such streets in accordance with the reports and the assessment of benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota - Statutes, Chapter 429, at an estimated total cost of the improvement of 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 13th day of June, 2000, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center at 6:00 P.M., and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. Mayor City Administrator 4 - F- Hutchinson Citv Center Ll 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchimoa. MN 55350.2122 320.587- 5151/F" 320.234 -1240 MEMORANDUM r 1 DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY HOERNEMANN TRUST (NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15) Pursuant to Section 12.01, of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a lot split. HISTORY On April 17, 2000, Hoememann Trust submitted an application for a lot split of property north of Airport Road and east of TH 15. The parcel currently consists of two tracts of land, one described as torrens and the other abstract. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. A joint resolution for annexation was approved by the City Council on April 4, 2000. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the lot split Respectfully submitted, Bill Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: John Asfeld, Hoememann Trust, U.S. Bank, 1015 West St. Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302 -0887 Ame Esterbrooks, Developers Resource, 15525 32" Avenue North, Plymouth, MN 55447 Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., 4777 Menard Drive, Eau Claire, Wl 54703 -9625 L!- —C ,— Printed on recycled MPee . 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11482 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY THE HOERNEMANN TRUST BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Hoememann Trust, property owner, made application to the City Council for a lot split under Section 12.01 to split a lot with the following legal description: EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West, parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15: thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East. parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet, to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota. RT Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO- WIT: That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, Resolution No. Hoernemann Trust Lot Split May 23, 2000 Page 2 McLeod County, .Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C. thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A; thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. Also, The South 260.2 feet of Lot 19 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota EXCEPT the parcel described below: That part of Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod County, Minnesota, that lies east of the southerly extension of the east line of Sherwood Street, according to the record plat of SCMIDTBAUER'S FOURTH ADDITION; and north of the westerly extension of the north line of the AUDITOR'S PLAT OF LOT 15 OF THE AUDITOR'S PLAT OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 116 NORTH, RANGE 29 WEST, according to the record plat thereof. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARCEL A (Menards) The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota. �I That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West, parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East, parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet, to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116. Range 29, also known a� Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office 0 Resolution No. Hoernemann Trust Lot Split May 23, 2000 Page 3 of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota. LESS AND EXCEPT Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles. County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO- WIT: That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28: thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A: thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION — PARCEL B (Estebrook) Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles. County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO- WIT: That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A: thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. U Resolution No. Hoernemann Trust Lot Split Mav 23, 2000 Page 4 CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the lot split. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin D. Torgerson City Administrator Mayor u Hutchinson City Center C III Hamaa stmt SE Hutchin .MN 55350.2522 320-587 -515 VFm 320-234 -4240 MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIAL AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. Pursuant to Sections 10.01 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit HISTORY On April 11, 2000, Menard Inc. submitted an application for a conditional use permit for outdoor storage of material in conjunction with the operation of a lumber and hardware sales center. FINDINGS OF FACT I. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4, 2000. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The fence surrounding the outside storage area must be 100% opaque. _. The plantings must be installed within three months of the certificate of occupancy for the building. 3. The fence detail is provided on the plans as a 14 foot high structure will 2' X 8' vertical wood siding. 4. Facade of the building may be submitted. 5. Signage must be similar to those in area (Target area). Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission • cc: Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., 4777 Menard Drive, Eau Claire, WI 54703 -9625 John Asfeld, Hoememann Trust, U S Bank, 1015 West St Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302 -0887 tided m rc ycled paM - CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, • Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock, Holly Kreft and Julie Wischnack, AiCP Date: May 18, 2000 — Meeting Date to May 23, 2000 Re: Menard's Conditional Use Permit As a point of clarification, the staff would still recommend the fagade on the building be improved to match the surrounding development. Previously, staff recommended the same fagade as the Maple Grove store. Staff is awaiting pictures from the new Mankato store to compare. Both sets of pictures will be available at the City Council meeting. cc: Mary Prochaska, Menards Inc. Hoernernann Estate (John Asfeld) property owner —4 i - CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT 0 To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, dark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock, Holly Kreft and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: May 4, 2000 —Meeting Date May 16, 2000 Applicant: Hoernemann Trust, property owner Menards, Inc., applicant Brief Description The applicants are proposing the following requests: I. Conditional Use Permit — Required for outside storage of materials. 2. Preliminary Plat— The plat provides for 10 lots. (A lot split application to divide the property into two separate platting areas, Menards and Estebrook, is considered later on the agenda.) 3. Rezoning— All newly annexed property is automatically annexed as Rl. The property owner and applicant are requesting rezoning to C -4. i 4-1-1. Menard's CUP/Preliminary Plat/Rezoning Planning Commission Review — May 16, 2000 Page 2 GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: RI (recently annexed) Property Location: Northeast comer of Airport Road and State Highway 15 Existing Land User Agricultural Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Rural homes to the south, commercial to the northwest, agricultural to the north. Zoning in the area is rural residential, agricultural, and commercial. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Zoning History: This property was reviewed during the annexation process. Applicable Regulations: Section 10.01, Chapter 11, Zoning Code; Section 12.10, Preliminary Plat SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation The property will have an access from Airport Road (CSAH 8) and from newly constructed Edmonton Avenue. Currently, Edmonton Avenue is • controlled with a semaphore. The development will be assessed for 25% of the cost for construction of the semaphore. The developer is required to install a right turn lane travelling west bound on Airport Road and a right turn lane travelling north bound on State Highway 15. North of Edmonton, a second lane and shoulder area must be graded (either at the time of this construction or when the two northern lots develop). Internally, the developer will be constructing the extension of Edmonton Avenue and a circulator street. Edmonton will be a five — lane, 10 ton design. The circulator street would be required to be a minimum of 9 ton. Parking The parking plan provides for 395 parking spaces. The code requires 1 space per 1,000 square feet for warehouse stores (104,374 square feet). It also requires 1 space per 2,000 square feet for warehouse area (43,356 square feet). Therefore; parking spaces provided on the plan meet the code requirements. The code requires 8.5 feet by 20 foot parking spaces. The depth of the parking spaces seem to be meeting the requirement. However, the width of the spaces are measuring too narrow. Signage and Facade The proposed signage equals 320 square feet for the pylon signs. The allowance, by code, is 4 square feet per front foot of building (480 feet), which equals 1,920 square feet. The applicant has not submitted the square footage amounts for the building signage. When this is submitted, staff could verify if it met the City Code. Staff is recommending a different type of sign be used (similar to the one at Target). it is important, as the gateway to the community, that signage Menard's CUP/Preliminary Plat/Rezoning Planning Commission Review — May 16, 2000 Page 3 and building fafade complement the existing development in the area. The Menard's store in Maple Grove seems to be a better prototype than other buildings in the Twin Cities Area. Lighting Lighting along the new circulator street should match the city lighting (atom type fixtures). Interior lighting is not required to be of similar type. Landscaping The C4 Zoning District requires a minimum of one tree per 800 square feet of landscaping area (2 inch minimum caliper or 6 feet for coniferous). The plan provides for 87 trees and 62 scrubs. Recommendation: Staff met to discuss the plan and recommend approval of conditional use permit with the following conditions: L The fence surrounding the outside storage area must be 100% opaque. 2. The plantings must be installed within three months of the certificate of occupancy for the building (opening of the store may take place prior to plant materials being available). 3. The fence detail is provided on the plans as a 14 foot high structure with 2 x 8 vertical wood siding. The fence encloses 3.49 acres of outside storage. 4. Facade of building must be similar to Maple Grove store. 5. Signage must be similar to those in area (Target area). Signage square footage allowance must still be reviewed. Staff also recommends approval of the preliminary plat with the following condition: 1. Lighting design.along new street must incorporate City lighting standards (atom style). 2. Lots within the plat must be at least l acre in size. 3. Construction plans for storm water and streets must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. (This shall include construction details for turn lanes, Edmonton Avenue, and new street.) 4. Execution of a Subdivider's Agreement must coincide with the final plat. 5. Appropriate utility easements must be dedicated. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning request meets the comprehensive plan guidance for the area. 2. The rezoning is appropriate for highway uses. 3. The C4 District adjoins this parcel to the west. Therefore; the request would not be considered "spot" zoning. cc: Mary Prochaska, Menards Inc. Hoememann Estate (John Asfeld) property owner � CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock, Holly Kreft and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: May 9, 2000 —Meeting Date May 16, 2000 Re: ADDENDUM TO MENARD'S STAFF REPORT Additional information for the report includes the following: Park and Recreation Fees The subdivision code (12.40, subdivision 6) requires that there be a negotiated cash contribution based on fair market value of the land. Staff is proposing Menard's purchase park equipment valued between $16,000 and $20,000 (play structure) to be located in Connecticut Park. The structure would symbolize that Menard's has donated the play structure. Subdivision Fees There is a 6% improvement charge for all new development constructing their own improvements. The fee is 6% of the construction costs (minus grading). The fee must be paid prior to construction occurring and is required by the subdivider's agreement. Sewer and Water Fees There will be sewer and water access charges due at the time of building permit issuance. The Citv notifies the subdivider in advance to allow preparation for costs of the project. The fees for sanitary sewer access will be $2,000 per acre. Fees for water main access are $1.330 acre. (Fee schedule January 25, 2000.) A lateral assessment will also be charged to the property for the sanitary sewer line, which will be constructed from the east. The water main will be extended from west of Highway 15 to the proposed access road. The project will be assessed for this water main extension. cc: Mary Prochaska, Menards Inc. Hoememann Estate (John Asfeld) property owner 7 — #. Publication No 6158 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, May 4, 2000 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA I l l Hassan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, at City Hall on Tuesday, May 16, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Menard Inc., property owner, is requesting a conditional use permit for outdoor storage of material for a hardware and lumber retail center at property located north of Airport Road and east of TH 15. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: Proposed Menard's ^City Limit Boundary All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. 0 May 2, 2000 Date 2J & City Administrat&j 4 -!!. DETAIL TYPICAL LMGSC*PE SEE XTML M IN C r Zl i; .r. M&1 A R_DrS� BUILDING AREA 161,640 SO. FT. RETAIL AREA+ 102,693 SQ. FT. RECEIVING AREA 16,047 SO. FT. WAREHOUSE AREA 42,900 SQ. FT. wAm vAPEHDAE AKA ,= �� ,u.,,.* SO. Fr. as9* ACRO DOWm RACK r, ✓ ✓� SS 1; 1;1' !: S �i �. -m,L MEA • 0 0 T I LOT 20 .1 IV L LOT I c dp 4 ------ BL0CK .2' AVE"� 4-7 - --------- XL - ------- It I % AOV �= ....... .Kwin1! 9i LOCK OLOCK SW 1 ?4 dP lit LOT 2 ............. X 40 ,44 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11483 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTSIDE STORAGE OF MATERIALS AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN: FINDINGS 1. Hoememann Trust., owner, and Menard Inc., applicant have submitted an application for a conditional use permit for outside storage of materials at the following described property: E LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; UIL The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And That part of Lot M of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7. Township 116. Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Lot 20; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43-19, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota. . 2. The Ciiv Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. Resolution No. 11483 Ntenard Inc. May 23, 2000 Page 2 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use. with the listed conditions, will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. The fence surrounding the outside storage area must be 100% opaque. 2. The plantings must be installed within three months of the certificate of occupancy for the building. 3. The fence detail is provided on the plans as a 14 foot high structure will 2' X 8' vertical wood siding. 4. Signage must be similar to those in area (Target area). Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor C 0 Hutchinson City Center 111 Ha Street SE Hutchlnsaa- -MN 55350.2522 320.587.515 VFn 320234 -4240 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 FROM R -1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO C4 (FRINGE COMMERCIAL) AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. Pursuant to Section 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 11, Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HISTORY On April 11, 2000, Menard Inc. applied for rezoning of property located north of Airport Road and east of TH 15 from R• 1 to C -4. The property is currently owned by the Hoememann Trust which was recently annexed into the City of Hutchinson. FINDINGS OF FACT • 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4,2000. 3. A public hearing was held at which neighbors did have concerns that had been addressed by Menard's. 4. The property adjoins other commercially zoned property. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve the rezoning based on the following factors: 1. The rezoning request meets the comprehensive plan guidance for the area. 2. The rezoning is appropriate for highway uses. 3. The C4 District adjoins this parcel to the west. Therefore; the request would not be considered "spot" zoning. Respectfully submitted, Bill Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., 4777 Menard Drive, Eau Claire, WI 54703 -9625 John Asfeld, Hoernemann Trust, U S Bank, 1015 West St Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302 -0887 0 Nnl� m �icd PW" - 7 PUBLICATION NO. 0 ORDINANCE NO. 00 -274 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -1 to C-4 (proposed as Menard's Inc.) with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; Is And That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West, parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East. parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet, to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota. LESS AND EXCEPT Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO- WIT: 1 0 That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at Ll T, Resolution NO. _ Menards Rezoning May 23, 2000 Page 2 the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A; thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 0 Hutchinson City Center 0 Ill Haven Street SE Hu .hi � MN 55350-2522 320. 587- 5151/Fu 326274.4240 MEMORANDUM • DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A FOUR -LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. Pursuant to Section 3.20 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a preliminary plat. HISTORY On April 11, 2000, Menard Inc. submitted an application for a preliminary plat consisting of 10 lots (4 blocks). Applications for rezoning and a conditional use permit were simultaneously considered. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application and plat maps were submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4,2000. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended approval of the plat with following conditions: 1. Lighting design along the new street must incorporate City lighting standards (acom style). 2. Lot within the plat must be at least I acre in size. 3. Construction plans for storm water and streets must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. This shall include construction details for rum lanes, Edmonton Avenue and the new street. 4. Executions of a Subdivider's Agreement must coincide with the final plat. 5. Appropriate utility easements must be dedicated. Respectfully submitted, Bill Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., 4777 Menard Drive, Eau Claire, WI 54703 -9625 John Asfeld, Hoememann Trust, U S Bank, 1015 West St Germain St., St. Cloud, MN 56302- 0887 N."ea . mcycLd wa= - ✓ 1 • RESOLUTION NO. 11484 RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MENARDS INC. WHERE AS, Menards Inc., as applicant and Hoernemann Trust, as owner have submitted a preliminary plat for an I 1 lot subdivision. Said subdivision was submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the Hutchinson Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-wit; Legal Description: The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range • 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10 acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota; And That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340 feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West, parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East, parallel with said South line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7 feet, to the point of beginning. LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota. LESS AND EXCEPT Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO -WIT: �J Resolution No. 11484 Preliminary Plat — Menards Inc. May 23, 2000 That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C: thence East assumed bearing, along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A; thence East, along the south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28: thence South, along the west tine of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00 feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, ,VMNNESOTA: That said preliminary plat is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following conditions: L Lighting design along the new street must incorporate City lighting standards (acom style). 2. Lots within the plat must be at least 1 acre in size. 3. Construction plans for storm water and streets must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer. This shall include construction details for rum lanes. Edmonton Avenue and the new street. 4. Executions of a Subdivider's Agreement must coincide with the final plat. 5. Appropriate utility easements must be dedicated. Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 2000 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin Torgerson City Administrator Mayor 0 I • Hutchinson City Center 111 Hasson Street SE Hutchl000a..MN 55350.2522 320. 587- 51511Fo 320.2344240 MEMORANDUM DATE: May l7, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PROPOSED EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S 3" ADDITION FROM R -I (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO R -2 (MEDIUM DENISTY RESIDENTIAL) AND R -3 (MEDIUMIHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AS REQUESTED BY DEVELOPER'S RESOURCE INC. Pursuant to Section 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 11, Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HISTORY On April 14, 2000, Menard Inc. applied for rezoning of property located north of proposed Edmonton Avenue and South of Broll's 3r Addition from R- I to R -2 and R -3. The property is currently owned by the Hoememann Trust which was recently annexed into the City of Hutchinson. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4, 2000. 3. A public hearing was held at which there were neighbors objecting to the request. 4- The property adjoins other R -2 and R -3 zoned property. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to approve the rezoning with the adjustment that the most northerly and easterly blocks remain zoned R -1 (Low Density Residential). Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planting Commission cc: Ame Esterbrooks, Developers Resource, 15525 32i Avenue N, Plymouth, MN 55447 Marty Campion, Otto Associates, 9 West Division, Buffalo, MN 55313 CJ Primed M a lupin - 4— k' CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ; To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock, Holly Kreft and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: May 8, 2000 — Meeting Date May 16, 2000 Applicant: Hoernemann Trust, property owner Arne Estebrook, Developer Brief Description The applicant is proposing Rezoning of the other portion of the Hoememann Estate from Rl to R2 and R3. (R2 is medium density residential with a minimum lot size of 8,400 square feet. R3 is a medium to high density residential area with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet for single family, 5,000 for two family, and 4,2.00 for 3 to 8 unit buildings.) 4 -K Estebrook Rezoning Planning Commission Review — May 16,'_000 Page 2 GENERAL IlYFORMATION Existing Zoning: RI (recently annexed) Property Location: South of Bradford Street and Sherwood Street Existing Land Use: Agricultural Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Rural homes to the south and east, commercial to the west, variety of residential to the north Comprehensive Land Use Plan: See map Zoning History: This property was reviewed during the annexation process. Applicable Regulations: Section 6.05 of Chapter 11, Hutchinson City Code Recommendation: This request includes a possible sketch of the development potential of the property. This sketch is not included for review comments, as this will be accomplished at the preliminary plat stage. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning follows the guidance of the comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed zoning is consistent with the existing zoning in the area. 3. The proposed zoning will allow for similar single family units to be constructed next to existing single family. (The lots to the north of the proposed R2 area are between 13,500 square feet and 52,283 square feet.) cc: Ame Estebrook, Developer Marry Campion. Project Engineer Hoememann Estate (John Asfeld) property owner — ,� PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING M" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: 0 0 The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -I to R2 and R3 as provided in Exhibit A and with the following legal descriptions LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R2 Area: LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R3 Area: See Exhibit B See Exhibit C Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor i r ORDINANCE NO 00 -2; 5 Estebrook Area May 23, 2000 Page 2 EXHIBIT A dao��oo�� rra++ r��r rr + ++ V ♦ ♦ � eOv■ v i M11MM MMM t �O. 0 MMM �� � . s • • ■ ' WON MMM. � ' MMM MM 11111111 MM � MMMMM MMMM MMM MMMM MMMM 0►00000 D i MMM �. • i MMMMM MMMM y�y MMMM 0 MMMMM MMMM KI>t � +M� yy MMM � IIMMMM 1111~~ MM 4rM� MMMM 0 C�7 ow �pafe DEVELOPERS RESOURCE - /s�, Hutchinson Citv Center ❑1 Hawn Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350.2522 320- 567.5151/Fm 324234 -4240 MEMORANDUM r L_ DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A UTILITY TRANSMISSION LINE IN THE FLOODWAY AS REQUESTED BY THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION (SECTION 8 OF HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) Pursuant to Sections 10.01 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On March 27, 2000, Hutchinson Utilities Commission submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a utility transmission line in the floodway. Public hearings were previously held by the Joint Planning Board and the McLeod County Planning Commission regarding the proposed line and substation located outside of city limits. I. The required application was submitted and the fee waived. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4, 2000. FINDINGS OF FACT The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. Any permits required by other agencies (i.e. MN DNR, Corp of Engineers) shall be obtained and copies of such permits provided to the City. 2. Plans or documents certifying that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 3. Any topographic surveys shall be made available to the City Planning Staff for review, prior to construction. 4. Relocation of the line relative to this request shall be made by written documentation to the City Planning Staff. Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission E cc: Clarence Kadrmas, Director of Hutchinson Utilities Commission Robert Collett, MNDNR Area Hydrologist, 20596 Hwy 7 West, Hutchinson, MN 55350 ennted m r-ycka Pw - Publication No 6159 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, May 4, 2000 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OFMCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 l l Hassan Street. Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, at City Hall on Tuesday, May 16, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Hutchinson Utilities Commission, applicant, is proposing to construct a 11 5K transmission line within the floodway of the South Fork of the Crow River. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. City Addtinistratok) Mav 2, 2000 Date CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ----- v_ -------- F_.__�_._- �._.�_____,�_,.: • To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheitter, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: May 5, 2000 — Meeting Date: May 16, 2000 Applicant: Hutchinson Utilities Commission Brief Description Hutchinson Utilities Commission is proposing a 115 KV line. This line is covered by three jurisdictions: McLeod County, Joint Planning Area and City of Hutchinson. Both the County and Joint Planning Area require conditional use permits for major essential service lines. The City, however, only requires a conditional use permit for transmission lines constructed in the floodway. The public hearings for both of these requests were held in April. The proposed line would cross the South Fork of the Crow River in the south half of Section 8 of Hassan Valley (see map). The route outside of City limits may be changed and public hearings will be held again. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: I -1/I -2 Property Location: South half of Section 8, Hassan Valley Township Lot Size: N/A Existing Land Use: HATS, Wastewater Treatment Facility, Compost Site Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Farmland, I -2 to the west Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Zoning History: Applicable • Regulations: Industrial N/A Section 8.18 — Flood Plain Management Conditional Use Permit Hutchinson Utilities Commission Planning Commission Review — May 16, 2000 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Panting: N/A Physical Characteristics: Shoreland of the South Fork of the Crow River; riparian woodland Analysis: The zoning ordinance states that "utility transmission Lines" require a conditional use permit in the floodway district. Section 8.18.11 addresses the factors that the Planning Commission should take into consideration when reviewing the request. The Ordinance also states "all public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain shall be flood proofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation". Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Any permits required by other agencies (i.e. MN DNR, Corp of Engineers) shall be obtained and copies of such permits provided to the City. 2. Plans or documents certifying that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 3. Any topographic surveys shall be made available to the City Planning Staff for review, prior to construction. 4. Relocation of the line relative to this request shall be made by written documentation to the City Planning Staff. Cc: Clarence Kadrmas, Director of Hutchinson Utilities Commission Rob Collett, DNR Area Hydrologist 0 0 LM rmo 04TVAHM me EV rarrce �� d HMSES —%ST 0 d v� Z POSED iiw, uE PROPOSED 119RV 11K COMITY 67 MO GT!]R[TRn IYTN FOR wwo RREasm It rc ..ham A I, ,III .I i -I• , , �+� �I'r!�I; i, ,`, � 'I '! CITY I LIMITS I I OLD T.H. 22 I i JOINT i i I PLANNING BOUNDARY •I � i y � I! II � I ? AIRPORT ROAD PROPOSED ! 115KV LINE yy , ' 1 lil II I,i i y y , �4p pp , 0 RESOLUTION NO. 11485 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A UTILITY TRANSMISSION LINE IN THE FLOODWAY AS REQUESTED BY THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: FINDINGS 1. Hutchinson Utilities Commission, applicant, has submitted an application for a conditional use permit for the construction of a utilities transmission line in the floodway at the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see attached 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and ann- ipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of • the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use, with the listed conditions, will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1. Any permits required by other agencies (i.e. MN DNR, Corp of Engineers) shall be obtained and copies of such permits provided to the City. 2. Plans or documents certifying that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 3. Any topographic surveys shall be made available to the City Planning Staff for review, prior to construction. 4. Relocation of the line relative to this request shall be made by written documentation to the City Planning Staff. Adopted by the City Council this 23r day of May, 2000. • ATTEST: 4 -L, Gary D. Plotz Marlin D. Torgerson City Administrator Mayor Hutchinson Citv Center 0 I I I Hassan Sur t SE Hutchhmn, SIN 55350.2522 320.587.5151/Fu 320.734.4240 MEMORANDUM i DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM I/C (INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL) TO R -2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 106 MONROE STREET SW Pursuant to Section 6.05 of Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 11, Hutchinson City Code, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for rezoning. HISTORY On April 14, 2000, Today's Property Management applied for rezoning of property located at 106 Monroe Street SE from UC to R -2. FINDINGS OF FA L The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson leader on May 4, 2000. 3. The property is currently being utilized as residential. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 6-1 to approve the rezoning. Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Lori Bemis, Today's Property Management, 35 Main Street North, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Publication No 6160 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, May 4, 2000 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 234 -4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, at City Hall on Tuesday, .Way 16, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Today's Property Management, applicant, is requesting rezoning from the UC (Industrial/Commercial) District to R -2 (Medium Density Residential) for property located at 106 Monroe Street SE with the following legal description: Legal Description: Lot One (l) of Block Sixteen (16) in the South Half of Hutchinson Townsite The following is a map, which identifies the location of the property: 1 WASHINGTON AVE E 2 1 10 1 '0 ' 'G p 2 G 3 0 2 9 3 9 � 3 S S a • s G e � sc AVE SF 0 0 10 1 - 10 1 t0 1 2 0 2 G 2 GI 2 S 2 2 l S 3 ! 17 ] S 2 S f4 0 B 6 p • • ] y a 11 AVE SF 1 f0 1 0 t +0 1 f0 t V1 10 1 v 2 2 2 S 2 G 2 p 2 e a e a o ] S 0 B 32 2 • 4 r • ] ° e e a ' All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials at available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. May 2.'_000 Date 4 -� CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT __... w_. .________.�w.w___._._w_rM. To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Schieffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack Date: May 5, 2000 — Meeting Date May 16, 2000 Applicant: Today's Property Management, applicant Jay Freedlund, property owner Brief Description The applicant is proposing rezoning of this parcel from I/C (Industrial/Commercial) to R- 2 (Medium Density Residential). An existing single family dwelling is located on the lot and is in need of repair. Because residences are not allowed in the UC District, the residence would be considered a non - conforming use. Non-conforming structures may not be "enlarged, extended, converted, reconstructed or structurally altered unless the use of the structure is changed to one permitted within the district ". The applicants are proposing change of the district versus change of the use. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: I/C Proposed Zoning: R -2 Property Location: 106 Monroe Street SE Lot Size: 7,392 square feet (56' X 132') Existing Land Use: Single Family Dwelling Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: R -2 directly abutting to the south, all other sides zoned I/C Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Industrial/Commercial Zoning History: Lot to the south was rezoned from I/C to R -2 in 1992 Applicable Regulations: Section 8.13 I/C District Section 4.04 Non - conforming Structures 4—M Rezoning Today's Property Management —106 Monroe St. SE Planning Commission Review — May 16, 2000 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: N/A Parking: N/A Physical Characteristics: Flat lot Analysis: This area is unique in that many of the existing residences are non- conforming structures within the I/C District. Because most of the adjacent area is zoned I/C, staff questions if a more intense residential use of the property is appropriate with respect to the rest of the area. If the City's intention is to phase out residential uses in this area, then expansion of the existing residential district would not be in compliance with the comprehensive land use plan. Recommendation: Based on the above analysis, staff would recommend denial of the rezoning request. Cc: Today's Property Management, Lori Bemis, 35 Main Street North, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Jay Freedland, Hutchinson Iron and Metal, 1130 5' Avenue SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350 —/0, U .. _ 1 _ 2 6 3 SE 1 2 15 3 4 5 SE 2 25 3 4 5 _ L J 2 3 46 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 10 9 2 9 7 3 8 — -6- -� 7 4 w 7 6 5 6 i fn t/C 10 1 9 2 8 16 3 O 7 32 4 a � Z 6 5 —� 10 1 9 2 8 2 3 7 4 6 5 10 1 9 2 8` 17 3 7 4 6 5 -- 10 1 uwi 9 2 8 2 3 cn 7 4 w N li 6 5i w I S 1 9TH 2 0 F0, 2 3 5 4 6 3 5i 7 4 10 1 9 2 8 1 3 7 4 I 6 5 10 1 9 8 22 3 7 4 6 5 -! PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND THE OFFICIAL ZONING IMAP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: The following described real property is hereby rezoned from I/C to R2 (Today's Property Management): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 16, in the south half of Hutchinson Towttsite, McLeod County, Minnesota Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor 14- 111 ' C Hutchinson Citv Center 111 Ha Street SE Hutchhn .MN 553564522 320- SV-5151/Fm 3202344240 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE AT A HEIGHT GREATER THAN 30" IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AS REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT 795 COLORADO STREET) Pursuant to Sections 10.01 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit HISTORY On April 19, 2000, John Ewert submitted an application for a conditional use permit to construct a fence at a height greater than 30" in the front yard setback. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4, 2000. 3. A public hearing was held at which no neighbors who objected were present RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following condition: 1. If the proposed fence is built within any easement, the property owner shall be responsible for repair need for any fencing damage during the maintenance or improvement of utilities within said easement. Respectfully submitted, Bill Amdt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission cc: John Ewert, 795 Colorado Street, Hutchinson, MN 55350 E 4 -/V/ Pnaed m nsyelea papa - Publication No 6161 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday. May 44, 20ff Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA l l l Hassan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax (320) 2344240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will he holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, at City Hall on Tuesday, Slay 16, 2000, at 5:30 Am. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: John Ewert, property owner, is requesting a conditional use Permit to construct a fence higher than 30° in a required front yard setback at property located at 795 Colorado Street. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: i2 IB 3 3 ry 19 L RR F, 3 Ilr p? 20 3 71 3 5 9 32 3 TNw 23 4 1 6 7 B a 2 3 yv'1vi 3 1 I IIRFC 6 H OR EN bI Cs (!f ED (aj = 2 Or ER 3 1 n0.2 f E10 TH AVE R 1 2 3 A ! 7 R B E DI TI N H LANDS 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 a 01h ADD. HOP NO H OAK RI OE CAROLINA AVE NW f N�K 7 2 17 3 U 5 � 1 2 3 2 3 1 2 I 5 7 1 HEL KD EL D'3I NTH AVE NW All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. City A mPstra May 2, 2000 Date r � � —N CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT E To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff. Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, dark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack, AICP 0 0 Date: May 5, 2000 — Meeting Date: May 16, 2000 Applicant: John Ewert, property owner Brief Description Mr. Ewert is requesting to construct a fence in the front yard of his residence. The Ordinance states that fences in the required front yard setback, (30 feet from the property line) are allowed only by conditional use permit if greater than 30" in height (48" if chain link). Mr. Ewert is proposing a 5' to 6' high fence. Because of limited back yard area, he is proposing this fence be placed in the front yard. The fence would most likely be of aluminum material and look similar to a wrought iron fence. GENERAL INFORMATION Existing Zoning: R -1 Property Location: 795 Colorado Street Lot Size: 14.000 square feet (140' X 100') Existing Land Use: Single Family Dwelling Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Planned Development to the north, otherwise R -1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential Zoning History: Helland's 7 Addition platted in 1985 Home built in 1988 Applicable Regulations: Section 10.07 — Fences and Walls Conditional Use Permit John Ewert Planning Commission Review — May 16. 2000 Page 2 Parking: Physical Characteristics: i Analysis: N/A SPECIAL INFORMATION Flat lot with larger trees located in the southern portion of the lot The zoning ordinance states that "in any residence district, no opaque fence, hedge, wail or similar structure shall rise over 30 inches, and no chain link fence over 48 inches, in height in the front yard and along side lot line to a distance equal to the required front yard setback ". While the proposed fence is not opaque, it still is higher than the 48 inches allowed for a chain link fence. Since this requirement of the Ordinance is to provide for a clear line of sight. and the proposed fence will not prohibit that staff recommends approval with the following conditions: If the proposed fence is built within any easement, the property owner shall be responsible for repair need for any fencing damage during the maintenance or improvement of utilities within said easement. Cc: John Ewert, 795 Colorado Street, Hutchinson, MN 55350 • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN: �1 1. John Ewert, property owner, has submitted an application for a conditional use permit for the construction of a fence at a height greater than 30" in the front yard setback at the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot One (1) in Block Three (3) in HELLAND "S SEVENTH ADDITION according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Re of Titles in and for the County of McLeod and State of Minnesota • 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use, with the listed conditions, will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE AT A HEIGHT GREATER THAN 30" IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AS REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT (795 COLORADO STREET) RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: RESOLUTION N0. 11486 1. If the proposed fence is built within any easement, the property owner shall be responsible for repair need for any fencing damage during the maintenance or improvement of utilities within said easement. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgetson Mayor 4—W, o--- o n R T N —NO — n co r I G O r 1 i I. W Soh n 715 Colef,J. St. Ai. vi, /��tchnso; M►.1. 5535o — — — — — — -ce nc2, - - - - Se{ 6,( k r(c �o,a ho'A,u a • '♦rent, p P"F&'4 S}tKv '' O"A C11- ColorA o S t Al. W. Hutchinson Citv Center C Ill Hama Shvet SE Hatehimen. MN 55350.2522 320-5V-515t/Fa 320.2344240 0 0 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A 6' VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION FOR OFFICE SPACE WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 20 FEET AS REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL (340 MICHIGAN STREET SE) Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On April 19.2000. Allied Mechanical Systems submitted an application for a variance from the setback from Michigan Street from 30' to 29'6 ". The variance is for construction of an addition which will replace the existing temporary mobile home used for office space. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid. 2. Notices wen marled to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. 3. A public hearing was held at which then were no neighbors objecting to the request Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the variance with the following conditions: 1. Paving of the parking lot shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 2. Outdoor storage must be addressed either by fencing or storage in the new addition. Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Allied Mechanical Systems, 340 Michigan Street, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Pnraed on r k4 pyer. Publication No 6162 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER Thursday, :stay 4,'_000 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext. 258 fax(320)Z34-4240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers, at City Hall on Tuesday, :Nay 16, 2000, at 5:30AM. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Allied Mechanical. applicant, is requesting a variance to reduce the side vard setback from 30' to 29.5' for the construction of an addition to the existing building located at 340 Michigan Street SE. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: 2 XINOS MIC. NlTrl WN m J uc :: E . iy-�yplt BLOCK 1 v, t u MSION z W z h RIHARO wmuT C O 24 s e WTCNEISON a TELEPHONE 4 �. 2 ti x x e � S1X AVE SE ] , '3 o S Il l DD All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. Ciry minist for Mav 2.2000 Date 0 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT ; To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack Date: May 5, 2000 — Meeting Date: May 16, 2000 Applicant: Allied Mechanical Systems (Applicant) Allied Properties of Hutchinson (Property Owner) Brief Description The applicant currently has a conditional use permit for the allowance of a temporary mobile home to be used as office space. This conditional use permit was granted in January with the condition that it be removed within six months. In order to construct the additional office space to the existing building, a variance of 6" is needed (see site plan). The required setback from street right -of -way in the I -1 District is 30 feet; however, the proposed addition is 29.5' from right -of -way. GENERAL INFORMATION 0 0 Existing Zoning: I -1 Property Location: 345 Michigan Avenue Lot Size: 1.07 acres Existing Land Use: Allied Mechanical Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: Northern property owned also by Allied Mechanical Area Zoned IA Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Industrial Zoning History: Conditional Use Permit granted in February 2000 Applicable Regulations: Section 8.14 — Setbacks in Industrial District Section 6.04 — Variance Required Variance Allied Mechanical Planning Commission Review — Nlav 16, 2000 Page 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION Am Transportation: Access from Michigan Street and 5"' Avenue SE Parking: Current parking lot is gravel and approximately 80' Y 80' Physical Characteristics: Flat lot; still outdoor storage issues Analysis: The original conditional use permit for the temporary mobile home was approved in May, 1999. One of the conditions attached was that the building not be located there for more than six months. This deadline would have been in November of 1999. The conditional use permit was extended for an additional six months in February, 2000. The proposed addition does not meet the required setback from the right- of -wav from Michigan Street and therefore requires a variance. The hardship listed is that when the 5 Avenue bridge was done, Allied's lot size was reduced. Other items to consider include paving of the parking lot and outdoor storage. The Ordinance states that "all existing parking lots with sub - standard surfaces should be allowed to remain until either the property is sold or a building permit for an addition or remodeling is requested ". The standards for parking lots are "parking areas and access drives shall be covered with an all - weather surface. Said all- weather surface shall be a minimum standard of six (6) inch gravel base and two (2) inch plant mix bituminous surface ". Outdoor storage is addressed by 'open storage in Industrial or Commercial Districts shall be allowed only with a Conditional Use Permit...all other storage shall be maintained within an enclosed building or structure ". Staff recommends approval of the variance with the following conditions: Paving of the parking lot shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Outdoor storage must be addressed either by fencing or storage in the new addition. Cc: Allied Mechanical Systems, 340 Michigan Street, Hutchinson MN 55350 0 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ALLIED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS LOT 3, BLOCK 1, SWANSON'S SUBDIVISION IN HUTCHINSON INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT • D.nonr. Y.n mrnumm IourM O D.IIpi.. Yon IIIOn., ..I MLa cv 1111 In.r rnl. Sulvq. Plen a Mum .0 rruou Gs n. ..ec n.r el..cr .u.srrlau .n. In., n. L 1. u. n lurrry.r u4r In• l.0 •L rn. Suu .1 Ylnnu•u. .�, a ..... 0 15 1 0 50 .col• n 2 ° 1 0 \ 10 r I riot p�^ xaJ I I 2, I a 0 4 e � a I I = w All I o I I a I ze Lao" sla" m 0 3 a Q3 o V1 WIp.� tAQ! OII O �. IYI19 —I . L r� FIFTH AVENUE SE CITY OF HUTCHINSON STREET RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 3 Jas Ya a 7 3e P -Z% PG 32 to r. LLJ LLI LIJ cr H (n s' . z a c? � c.8 � z � I l� corm ".A RESOLUTION NO. 11487 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF ALLIED MECHANICAL SERVICES TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 30' AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 340 MICHIGAN STREET SE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN: F ING Allied Properties of Hutchinson. property owner, made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 6.04 to construct an addition which does not meet the required setback of 30' from Michigan Street on property with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 1. Swanson's Subdivision in Hutchinson Industrial District 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of • the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Hardship resulted from additional ri ght of way acquisition which was necessary to construct 5 Avenue. This acquisition made the,,---, smal er; thus limiting the building area of the property. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions: I. Paving of the parking lot shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. '_. Outdoor storage must be addressed either by fencing or storage in the new addition. Adopted by the City Council this 23" day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgetson Mayor • Hutchinson City Center ill H,n.a sheet SE Hutchim ..MN 55750.1522 320- 587.5131/Fu 720.2754240 MEMORANDUM is DATE: May 17,200-0 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR A 60' x 200' COMMERCIAL BUILDING AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD MCCLURE (945 5 ttr AVENUE SE) Pursuant to Section 8.05, of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planting Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendatton with respect to the aforementioned request for variance. HISTORY On February 17, 2000, Richard McClure submitted an application for a variance from the setback from the front yard setback of 30 feet to 5 feet for construction of a 60' X 200' commercial building. The plans originally submitted required additional information. FINDINGS OF FACT I. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee patd. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. 3. A public hearing was held at which there were no neighbors objecting to the request. Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the variance with the following conditions: Remove all outside storage items or apply for a conditional use permit. Items stored on City -owned property must be removed. Silt fencing must remain until the soil is stabilized and pavement of the lots completed. The paving of the parking lot must completed prior to the certificate of occupancy for the building. itespecrfully submitted, Bil Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Richard McClure, 384 School Road SW, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Pnaed m md pWW - 4 -P Publication No 6163 PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON • LEADER Thursday, May 4, '_000 Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OFMCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street. Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, ext._58 fax (320) 234 -1240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at 6WHall on Tuesday, May 16, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: Richard McClure. applicant, is requesting a variance to reduce the retired front yard setback from 30' to 5' for the construction of a 60' X 200' building to be located at 945 5 Avenue SE. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. A *` w May 2, 2000 Date 2 +anus ac. W1rJNM3 -Nuc 3 1 f.0 BLOCK UBDI SIGN P21 IN AAO MLSPNO SCN „C O IRO/ � 1ELHhVnE NUTC 2 Y � ti ] STN AVE SE p t N 1] All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. A *` w May 2, 2000 Date • CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared Bv: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Dolf Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack Date: May 8, 2000 — Meeting Date: May 16, 2000 Applicant: Richard McClure, owner Brief Description The applicant is requesting a variance from the minimum setback of 30 feet from a right of way for construction of a new building. Mr. McClure recently purchased the property from the City of Hutchinson Economic Development Authority. The building is proposed 5 feet from the property line. The I- I zoning district requires a 30 foot setback from street right of way and 20 feet of setback for parking area The parking area is located up to the street right of way. The proposed building would be 60 x 200 feet or 12,000 square feet in size. The building would be used for additional business, similar to the existing building to the south of this property. GENERAL INFORMATION 0 0 Existing Zoning: 1 -1 Property Location: 945 5" Avenue South East Lot Size: 36,940 square feet Existing Land Use: vacant Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: West — city property; North — college; East — Allied Mechanical e x w.c..e Ire + +0 �_ P, Variance Richard McClure Planning Commission Review —May 16, 2000 Page 2 Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Industrial Zoning History: NA Applicable Regulations: Section 8.14 — Setbacks in Industrial District Section 6.04 — Variance Required SPECIAL INFORMATION Transportation: access 5" Avenue SE through property owned by applicant. Parldng: The existing parking lot is gravel (properties to the south). This must be corrected with paving. The proposed lot must also be paved. There is a siltation problem in the area. Since the area is exposed, precipitation washes material into the river. The applicant has installed silt fencing, which has assisted in addressing the problem. Although, a permanent solution must be provided (paving). The parking requirements are I per 1.000 square feet of building. The plan provides for adequate parking area. Physical Characteristics: The lot has a fairly steep slope, dropping 18 feet over 220 feet. The grading and storm sewer plans must be reviewed by the City Engineer Analysis: The requested variance is appropriate in that Arch Street is undeveloped and will not be utilized in the future, as a City street. Setbacks from rights of way are intended to provide the City with enough area to reconstruct a street or utilities. Since the street will not be utilized, this is not present an issue. The hardship for the property could be that this property is unique because it is one of the smaller properties in the area. The property is also unique with respect to lot depth. This lot is more shallow than other properties in the area. Staff recommends approval of the variance. However, items needing completion as a part of this variance include: I . Remove all outside storage items or apply for a conditional use permit. The City Code requires that all outside storage must be located within an enclosed building or structure. There are also items being stored on City owned property, which must be removed. '_. Silt fencing must remain until the soil is stabilized and pavement of the lots completed. 3. The paving of the parking lot must be completed by the certificate of occupancy for the building. (The Ordinance states "parking areas and access drives shall be covered with an all- weather surface. Said • all- weather surface shall be a minimum standard of six (6) inch gravel base and two (2) inch plant mix bituminous surface'. Cc: Richard McClure, property owner 9 RESOLUTION NO. 11488 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VARIANCE REQUEST OF RICHARD MCCLURE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 945 5 TH AVENUE SE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MIN: FINDINGS Richard McClure, property owner, made application to the City Council for a Variance under Section 6.04 to construct a commercial building which does not meet the required 30' setback from Arch Street on property with the following legal description: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 6. Block 1, Swanson's Subdivision in Hutchinson Industrial District 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, eaysting and anticipated traffic conditions, and the effect on values of properties in the strrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The hardship for the variance is the small lot size, as compared to other properties in the area. 4. Granting this variance will not negatively impact the city purposes of the Arch Street right of way. =. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the variance with the following conditions: 1. Remove all outside storage items or apply for a conditional use permit Items stored on City- owned property must be removed immediately. 2. Silt fencing must remain until the soil is stabilized and pavement of the lots completed. 3. The paving of the parking lot must completed prior to the certificate of occupancy for the building. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. 0 ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz Marlin D. Torgerson ` f City A dministrato r Mayor Hutchinson Citv Center 111 Ha Street SE Hutchfroon. MN 55350-2522 324587.5151/Fn 324234 -4260 MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONDrrIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING AND FILLING WITHIN THE FLOODWAY OF SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON (NORTH OF SHOPKO) Pursuant to Sections 10.01 of Zoning Ordinance No. 464, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a conditional use permit. HISTORY On April 19, 2000, the City of Hutchinson submitted an application for a conditional use permit for grading and filling within the floodway of the South Fork of the Crow River for construction of a 10' bituminous trail. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the fee waived. 2. Notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners as well as published in the Hutchinson Leader on May 4,2000. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: Silt fencing must be installed during construction. 2. Restoration of the slope must be completed before silt fencing may be removed. Respectfully submitted, Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchhlson Planning Commission cc: John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering and Public Works r w.d m mytrd PW- - ) —�2' Publication No 6164 PUBLISHED IN THE THE CHINSON LEADER Thursday, May 4, ZZMU Notice of Public Hearing CITY OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY OF MCLEOD STATE OF MINNESOTA 111 Hassan Street. Hutchinson MN 55350 phone (320) 587 -5151, exL_58 fax (320) 234 -3240 Notice is hereby given the Hutchinson Planning Commission will be holding a meeting in the Council Chambers. at City Hall on Tuesday, .Nay 16, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. for the purposes of holding a public hearing regarding an application from: City of Hutchinson, applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to fill within the floodway of the South Fork of the Crow River for construction of a 10' bituminous trail on property located north of Shopko. The following is a map which identifies the location of the property: i PA e e FORK � 2ND AVE Rif - - -� NUTCN�1 {O�•'p O�MTOWM BOCK 1 - E _ ! 4 ' '2 3 e e iiReS AVE MW TiRST AVE HE 2 ' 04 0 _ 2 °] 2 D 2 D W REDS QE "'ERr PUT v0. 2 2 OLC �A e e ] D All persons wishing to be heard regarding this application should appear at this meeting or provide written comments no later than 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, May 16, 2000. Plans and materials are available at the city offices for review, by appointment. A complete agenda of the Planning Commission meeting is also available at the City offices. If you have questions about the proposal, you may contact the Planning Department at the number provided. Mav 2.2000 Date — 4� ---- _____ ----- .________ ------- _..____ ----- _._ ------ . ---- ___...______._�___.�_ CITY OF HUTCHINSON PL STAFF REPORT ; 0 To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff- Brad Emans, Dick Scheiffer, Doff Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Holly Kreft, Christie Rock and Julie Wischnack, AICP Date: May 5, 2000 —Meeting Date: May 16, 2000 Applicant: C-tv of Hutchinson Brief Description The City of Hutchinson is proposing to construct a 10' bituminous trail along the north side of Shopko. Because grading and filling within the floodway is needed to construct the trail. a conditional use permit is needed. The trail will start at the existing pedestrian trail which crosses the Bluff St. bridge and continue to Fireman's Park (see attached map). GENERAL INFORMATION 0 Existing Zoning: C -3 Property Location: North of Shopko; south side of South Fork of Crow River Lot Sae: N/A Existing Land Use: Vacant lot; floodplain of Crow River Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: C -3. Central Commercial Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Zoning History: N/A Applicable Regulations: Section 8.18 — Flood Plains SPECIAL INFORMATION 0 Parking: N/A Physical Characteristics: Shoreland of South Fork of Crow River 4 -Q� Conditional Use Permit City of Hutchinson - Trail Planning Commission Review — May 16, 2000 Page 2 Analysis: The zoning ordinance states that' placement of fill" is a conditional use in the floodway. The proposed trail would use a minimal amount, less than 35 cubic yards, mostly for bank stabilization. Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Silt fencing must be installed daring construction. 2. Restoration of the slope must be completed before silt fencing may be removed. Cc: John Rodeberg, Director of Engineering, City of Hutchinson Rob Collett, DNR Area Hydrologist • 0 ! N SIKLII o fv o 35 CL R -50' \ y CI k ='L 00' TYPICAL SECTION 300% CONSI 2" YIPNI MIMED BITUMIWN4 WEAR COUk SL SPLC 2350 TYPE LV• _ CONST. 0' CLASS 5 AGGRCGjATE BASE SPEC 2211 (25% CRUSHED) - C OMPACTCO SUBURADE SPECS 2105 AND 2112 RCL CICA I I I Il DkAN I (tl L' IMP IE VAI VI 6 UIh Iul S' v" UIP 6 CL R =150' i p �, cL R -55 I p SIIOPKII RiMOVE PGLkLUAII TkAO ONIADENIAI_) RESOLUTION NO. i1489 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING AND FILLING WITHIN THE FLOODWAY OF THE SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN: FINDINGS City of Hutchinson. applicant. has submitted an application for a conditional use permit to grade and fill within the floodwav of the South Fork of the Crow River for the construction of a 10' bituminous trail at the following described property: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see attached '_. The Citv Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existm' and anticipated traffic conditions. and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use. with the listed conditions, will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: L Silt fencing must be installed during construction. 2. Restoration of the slope must be completed before silt fencing may be removed. Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor Hutchinson City Center 0 I11 H—, Street SE Hutchfneaa. MN 35350.2522 320.587- 5151/Fu 320.234 -1240 MEMORANDUM L J DATE: May 17, 2000 TO: Hutchinson City Council FROM: Hutchinson Planning Commission SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER (760 CENTURY AVENUE SW) Pursuant to Section 12.01, of Subdivision Ordinance No. 466, the Hutchinson Planning Commission is hereby submitting its findings of fact and recommendation with respect to the aforementioned request for a lot split. HISTORY On April 17, 2000, Curtis and Janel Reiter submitted an application for a lot split of property located at 760 Century Avenue SW. This parcel is Lot I, Block I of the Fair Grounds Addition which was planed in 1992. A conditional use permit was granted in 1999 for the construction of a new veterinary clinic. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The required application was submitted and the appropriate fee paid 2. The parcel is located in the UC (Indusaial/Commercial) District which does not have required lot dimensions. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the lot split Respectfully submitted. Bill Arndt, Chairman Hutchinson Planning Commission 0 cc: Curtis and Janel Reiter, 715 Goebel Street SW, Hutchinson, MN 55350 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT • To: Hutchinson Planning Commission Prepared By: Planning Staff: Brad Emans, Dick Schieffer, Doff Moon, Don Nelson, Gary Plotz, Jean Ward, John Rodeberg, John Olson, John Webster, Marc Sebora, Mark Hensen, Mark Schnobrich, Steve Madson, Christie Rock, Holly Kreft and Julie Wischnack Date: May 5, 2000 — Meeting Date May 16, 2000 Applicant: Curtis and Janel Reiter (Applicant and Property Owner) Brief Description The applicant is requesting a lot split of Lot 1, Block 1 of Fair Grounds Addition. The existing lot is 68,750 square feet (1.6 acres) in size. The relocated Pet Hospital is being constructed on the western end of the existing lot (please see attached survey). The proposed lots would be 120' X 250' and 155' X 250'. This is located in the UC District and therefore there are no minimum lot sizes. GENERAL INFORMATION • Existing Zoning: UC Lot Size: existing — 68, 750 square feet (275' X 250') proposed, Parcel A— 29,998 square feet (120' X 250') proposed, Parcel B — 38,747 square feet (155' X 250') Existing Land Use: Vacant; new small animal veterinary clinic Adjacent Land Use And Zoning: C -4 adjacent; R -3 north of Century Avenue Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Commercial Zoning History: CUP granted in 1999 Applicable Regulations: Section 12.20 Hutchinson Subdivision Ordinance SPECIAL INFORMATION 0 Transportation: Access from Century Avenue Parking: N/A Lot Split Reiters — Lot 1 Block 1 Fair Ground Addition Planning Commission Review —May 16, 2000 Page 2 . Analysis: The Fair Grounds Addition was platted in 1992. The proposed lot contains a 35 foot easement on the east side as shown on the survev. Since this is located in the I/C District, there are no lot size requirements; however. the recommended setbacks are 20 feet from interior lot lines and 30 feet from street right -of -way. The applicants should be made aware that there will be an additional cost for the stub -in of services on the east side. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the lot split. Cc: Curtis and Janel Reiter, 715 Goebel St. SW, Hutchinson, MN 55350 SKETCH AND DESCRIPTIONS FOR CURTIS AND JANEL REITER CENTURY AVENUE 1 111 1 I LOT 1 sp „ t � jv 1 I 1 N N '1T00'E 270.00 - -- -J2QGD — - -- 155M— a BLOCK I PEUI NEY LAND SURIJUrM HUTCIeelepY IY1 JGe NG, C dI 1` 1 N 0 fJ 70 00 •CO /I /n / //I Z TOTAL DESCRIPTION 1 O The 1 _ ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. 10 I G+.ee• ew rxq wxru � I 1 Q r' i I— Y M The East Hall of LOT I, Block I. IMF[ GHOLNUS C � ADDITION, according to the recorded plat Hereof. O Except the easterly 150.00 feet of sold Lot I. ,J BUILDING UNDER z `J pppp W GONSTRUC110N The Eafurly 155.00 feel of Lot I. Block I, FAIR Q GROUNDS ADDITION, according to the recorded plot c thereof. t_ PARCEL 8 38747 Square Feel PARCEL A 29998 Square Feu 1 to f N88'IY00'E LOT 3 I BLOCK I PEUI NEY LAND SURIJUrM HUTCIeelepY IY1 JGe NG, C dI 1` 1 N 0 fJ 70 00 •CO /I /n / //I Z TOTAL DESCRIPTION O The East Half of Lot I. Block I. FAIR GROUNDS _ ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. AREA • 68745 Square Feel O Q r' DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A I— Y M The East Hall of LOT I, Block I. IMF[ GHOLNUS C � ADDITION, according to the recorded plat Hereof. O Except the easterly 150.00 feet of sold Lot I. ,J m z DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B W 1�) The Eafurly 155.00 feel of Lot I. Block I, FAIR Q GROUNDS ADDITION, according to the recorded plot c thereof. 1 r,.I .Yr tel Illy Ippl 1 \I. eu�r.r. Plen me ul e.pvl ea. er.Hne Ir� •r wll M al .orervla.. W lest 1 a 11 tm..a L.na sur ver.r un.0 1[. lul 01 In. slat. of Wnmela. SKETCH OF PROPOSED BUILDING FOR RICHARD MCCLW -OTS a, ° S 6, BLOCK SWANSON'S SUBDIVISION N HUTCHINSON INDUSTRIAL CISTRIC7 0 SWdIaO 'E =7.00 - - _ _ — — — — — PROPOSED DRIVE N ' � 6 `II PROPOSED PARKING 22, 8 8 200 b - ` � p = c s - ,cap• �- PROPOSED BOLDING D 2 e PROPOSED PARKING ! c 227.00 - _ i - - 469'40'00'E 297.00 = '- — — — — — — — — — — _ — — — — — — _ — — — _ _ 0 1 a __ --------- �1 I m II w ; 'a PROPOSED PARKING w SSW40'OO'E 269.49 -- .� _.I <..... E.utM Pukmg rI C � \ _-- -- - -_� Eannq Budo�nq PskMg I 9 ���€ I •� • /� (1111 a / t __________ _ _ __ _� � Y I I t V. I, ____— _ - - - -_i i l4. . it 4i.2—...... L m mol • . -- ,,,, —� —.. ,,._ PAVEMENT SECTI�Y! ' 1 GxM.Nkl[aWiwNn _ ___ - 1N1H IM 11EORAT CW W I SI•IS I11 K�IWC l4. . it 4i.2—...... 0229 L m mol 0229 RESOLUTION NO. 11490 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT SPLIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW AS REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON. MN: 1. Curtis and Janel Reiter, property owners, made application to the City Council for a lot split under Section 12.01 to split a lot with the following legal description: EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East Half of Lot 1. Block 1. FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A: The East Half of Lot 1, Block 1. FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Except the easterly 155.00 feet of said Lot 1. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B: The Easterly 155.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, FAIR GROUNDS ADDITION, according to the recorded p thereof. 2. The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use on the health. safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands. existing and anticipated traffic conditions. and the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Council has determined that the proposed use is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATION: The City Council hereby approves the lot split. Adopted by the City Council this 23" day of May, 2000. ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor / i HUTCHINSON PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday. Aoril 18. 2000 •1. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Arndt at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Jason Olsen, Dean Kirchoff, Dave Westlund, Jim Haugen and Jeff Jones. Absent: Brandon Fraser. Also present: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Building/Zoning; Holly Kreft, Planning Coordinator and Marc Sebora, City Attorney. 2. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Haugen moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion carried. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF PROPOSED EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S 3RD ADDITION AS REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY Chairman Amdt opened the hearing at 5:33 p.m. with the reading of publication #6167 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained that the current property owner was the Hoememann Trust. She added that this property had been recently annexed. She reminded the Commission that property annexed into the City automatically was zoned R -1, Low Density Residential. She presented that proposed sketch plan which indicated single - family homes on the east side of the property and higher density housing on the west. Ms. Wischnack explained the difference between R -1 (Low Density Residential) and R -2 (Medium Density Residential). She explained that the minimum lot size requirements for R -1 was 10,000 square feet versus 8,400 square feet for R -2. She added that the area north of the proposed R -2 zone is currently zoned R -213 and clarified that the "B" indicated that this area was platted prior to 1988. Gary Knudsen, 130 Orchard Avenue, questioned what other developments in the City were also zoned R -2. Ms. Wischnack replied that the recent development of Bridgewater 2nd Addition was rezoned to R -2. She also added that the majority of the residential zoning in the City is R -2. Mr. Jones questioned if the Comprehensive Land Use Plan had been changed following the public hearing for Broll's 3 Addition. He added that he recalled that a "buffer' zone had been created south of the existing homes of Schmidtbauers 4'" Addition. Ms. Wischnack explained that there was a buffer area shown on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and referred the Commission to the map in the staff report. There was discussion relative to the intent of creating the buffer zone. Mr. Haugen stated that he felt it was created to alleviate traffic congestion along Century Avenue, but with the extension of Denver Avenue and Edmonton Avenue, this would not be a concern. Marty Campion, Otto Associates project engineer, stated that he believed the intention was for the first phase of the development to be single family homes. He also added that the developer would be willing to have a single row of homes on north and east side of the development remain R -1. Forrest Cravens, 325 Jefferson Court, and Thomas Byrne, 330 Jefferson Circle, questioned how drainage would be addressed. Mr. Campion replied that the drainage plans had not yet been finalized. Ms. Wischnack explained that another public hearing would be held to discuss the preliminary plat and that the drainage plans would be reviewed at that time. • Mr. Jones moved to close the hearing at 5:46 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jones moved to approve the rezoning except for the perimeter lots on the north (east of Sherwood Street) and east sides which shall remain R -1. Mr. Westiund seconded the motion. Motion to approve, based on guidance of the comprehensive plan and consistency with existing surrounding zoning, carried unanimously. Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 Page 2 b) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 FROM R -1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO C-4 (FRINGE COMMERCIAL) REQUESTED BY MENARD'S Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of publication #6157 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained that this property also was currently owned by the Hoememann Trust. She displayed the location map and preliminary plat layout. She explained that the lot for the proposed Menard's building would be approximately 21 acres. She explained the proposed route of the Edmonton Avenue extension. She added that the plan indicated 395 parking spaces and that this number met the requirements for a furniture /warehouse facility. She added that the frontage road would be privately built. Ms. Wischnack displayed photographs of other Menard stores. She added that staff was concerned that the fagade of the building should compliment other stores in the area as this would be a gateway to the City. There was discussion as to the facades and fencing types of the other Menard stores. Ms. Wischnack added that staff recommended that signage also compliment other signage in the area, for example the County Fair Marketplace monument sign. Mr. Haugen asked for clarification of fencing height requirements and if the Ordinance addressed maximum heights. Ms. Wischnack explained that there was not a maximum height limit for fencing, but any height over six feet would need to meet Building Code. Mary Prochaska, Menard Inc., explained the fagade construction of the other stores. He stated that Menard's had planned to construct a building with precast concrete panels similar to stores in Elk River and Mankato. He also added that the proposed building would have two exits. Mr. Olsen questioned if the proposed building would be a scaled -down version. Mr. Prochaska stated that it would be* standard size building. Mr. Arndt stated that he would like to see wider driveways to allow more room for trailers. Mr. Prochaska stated that he agreed, but that many cities required a maximum width of 30 feet. Ms. Wischnack stated that she would research the requirements. Donald Sitz, 1570 Bradford Street, stated that he had concerns regarding the snowmobile trail and landscaping adjacent to his property. He added that he had met with representatives from Menard's earlier and his concerns were addressed. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:09 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the rezoning. Mr. Haugen seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously. c) CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR A 4 -LOT SUBDIVISION TO BE LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD'S Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of publication #6157 for the conditional use permit as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request with the rezoning. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:09 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve the preliminary plat with the following conditions: lighting design alorl the new street must incorporate City lighting standards (acom style); lots within the plat must be one acre in size; construction plans for stone water and streets must be submitted and approved by the City Engineer (this shall include construction details for turn lanes, Edmonton Avenue and the new street); execution of a subdivider's agreement must coincide with the final plat; appropriate utility easements Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 ,Page 3 must be dedicated. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve with listed conditions carried unanimously. • d) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE OF MATERIAL AS REQUESTED BY MENARD'S (NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 5:47 p.m. with the reading of publication #6158 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request with the rezoning. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:09 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the conditional use permit with the following conditions: the fence surrounding the outside storage area must be 100% opaque; the plantings must be installed within three months of the certificate of occupancy for the building; the fence detail is provided on the plans as a 14 foot high structure with 2' X 8' vertical wood siding; the far ade of the building must be similar to the Maple Grove store; and signage must be similar to those in the area. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Mr. Kirchoff moved to amend his motion to include the conditions that the fagade be submitted and that driveway curb cuts be wider, if possible. Mr. Olsen seconded the amendment. Motion to approve with the amended conditions carried unanimously. e) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A UTILITY TRANSMISSION LINE IN THE FLOODWAY AS REQUESTED BY THE HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION (SECTION 8 OF HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) • Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:15 p.m. with the reading of publication #6159 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Kraft presented the request and explained the govemmental agencies that have jurisdiction over the proposed transmission line. She added that the conditional use permit required by the City is only for those poles which will be located in the floodway. Mr. Haugen asked what the extent of the floodway was in this area. Ms. Kreft replied that this would need to be researched, and that it will be addressed by staff once a topographic survey is made available. Mr. Jones questioned the amount of vegetation that would need to be removed. Ms. Kreft again stated that this information was not yet available. Mr. Kirchoff questioned what the flood proofing measures entailed. Ms. Kreft replied that the Building Official had indicated to her that only substantial structures require flood proofing and that this would be reviewed if a building permit application is made. Richard Schieffer, legal counsel for Hutchinson Utilities Commission, presented information. He stated that the Utilities Commission had reviewed the staff report and was in agreement with the recommended conditions. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:25 p.m. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to move with the following conditions: any permits required by other agencies shall be obtained and copies of such permits provided to the City; plans or documents certifying that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area; any topographic surveys shall be made available to the City Planning Staff for review, prior to construction; and relocation of the line relative to this request shall be made by written • documentation to the City Planning Staff. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the listed conditions carried unanimously. f) CONSIDERATION OF REZONING FROM I/C (INDUSTRIAUCOMMERCIAL) TO R -2 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY'S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 106 MONROE ST. SE Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 Page 4 Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:28 p.m. with the reading of publication #6160 as publishedin the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Kreft presented the request and displayed a map showing the exist zoning of the area. She stat that the property currently has a non - conforming residence on it and in order for the property owne to do any structural alterations or additions, it would need to be rezoned. She stated that the area was originally rezoned to the I/C District in 1978. She added that the lot directly to the south had been rezoned from I/C to R -2 in 1992. Mr. Westlund questioned what could be done to the residence if it were not rezoned. Ms. Kreft replied that no extensions or additions would be allowed as well as structural alterations. Bob Sandstede, representing Today's Property Management, discussed the use of the lot. He stated that the lot to the west was previously used as Hutchinson Iron and Metal, but that the lot in question had always been used as a residence. Ms. Kreft stated that staff had been contacted about the possibility of using the adjacent lot as an antique shop. She added that this would not be an allowed use in the R -2 District, but would be allowed by a conditional use permit in the I/C District. Christine Haefner, Today's Property Management, stated that the potential buyer for that lot has decided not to purchase it. Mr. Olsen questioned if residentially zoned areas abutting industrial and commercial areas was common. Ms. Wischnack replied that it was somewhat common, especially in the older areas of the City such as this. Mr. Haugen stated that he felt this area was better utilized as residential. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 6:40 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haugen moved to approve the rezoning. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. Motion to approvg the rezoning carried 5-1 with Chairman Amdt voting against. io g) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE AT A HEIGHT GREATER THAN 30" IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AS REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT (795 COLORADO STREET) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:43 p.m. with the reading of publication #6161 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Kreft presented the request and displayed a sketch showing the proposed fence location. She explained the maximum height allowed within the front yard setback was 30 ". She added that the proposed fence would be similar to a wrought iron fence and that staff had recommended approval. Mr. Ewert stated that he had planned to construct the fence outside of the 6' easement located on the southern property line. He added that the fence would be approximately 54" in height. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 6:45 p.m. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the conditional use permit with the condition that if the proposed fence is built within any easement, the property owner shall be responsible for repair needed for any fencing damaged during the maintenance or improvement of the utilities within the said easement. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the above condition carried unanimously. h) CONSIDERATION OF A 6" VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION FOR OFFICE SPACE WHICH DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIRED SETBACK OF 30 FEET AS REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL (340 MICHIGAN STREET SE) I is Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 6:46 p.m. with the reading of publication #6152 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 Page 5 Mr. Kirchoff excused himself from the Commission because he would be representing Allied Mechanical. • Ms. Kreft presented the request and displayed an overhead showing the proposed additions. She stated that the addition would be for office space that is currently located in a temporary mobile home. She added that staff recommended approval of the variance. Mr. Kirchoff stated that they had reviewed the proposed conditions by staff and that they felt the conditions could be met. Mr. Olsen asked when Allied Mechanical planned to start construction. Mr. Kirchoff replied that they hoped as soon as possible. Mr. Eric Knutson, owner of Lynn Card, asked if the storage would be removed. Mr. Kirchoff replied that all of the current material stored outside is going to be stored inside the addition. Mr. Jones moved to close the hearing at 6:52 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Jones moved to approve with the following conditions: paving of the parking lot shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy and that outdoor storage must be addressed either by fencing or storage in the new addition. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the list conditions carried 5 -0 -1. i) CONSIDERATION OF A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 5 FEET FOR A 60'x 200' COMMERCIAL BUILDING AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD MCCLURE (945 5'" AVENUE SE) Chairman Amdt opened the hearing at 6:54 p.m. with the reading of publication #6163 as published in the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Wischnack explained the request. She stated that the City was not interested in vacating the • easements in Arch Street at this time. Mr. Kirchoff asked if Arch Street was a minimum maintenance road. Ms. Wischnack replied that it was not and that a storm water pond may be placed in the vacated street. She also added that the current parking lot is gravel and due to the significant slope in the area, there was a large amount of runoff to the Crow River. She also added that silt fencing had been installed and would need to remain in place at least until the parking lot is paved. Ms. Wischnack stated that currently there are materials stored on City property which will need to be removed immediately. Mr. Jones stated that he felt a better process could be written in the Ordinance regarding vacated streets. Mr. Haugen questioned if the parking lot needed to be paved immediately. Ms. Wischnack stated that due to the proximity of the Crow River, staff felt that paving should be done as soon as possible. Mr. McClure stated that the building he had constructed last year was completed late last fall and there had not been time to pave the parking lot. He also added that the outdoor storage was construction material that would be removed as soon as the proposed project was complete. Mr. Arndt asked Mr. McClure if he intended to use Arch Street as access. Mr. McClure replied that he did not. Mr. Westlund moved to close the hearing at 7:03 p.m. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve the variance request with the following conditions: remove all outside storage items or apply for a conditional use permit; silt fencing must remain until the soil is stabilized and pavement of the lots completed; and paving of the parking lot must be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Mr. Kirchoff seconded the motion. Motion to approve with the listed conditions carried unanimously. • j) CONSIDERATION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING WITHIN THE FLOODWAY OF THE SOUTH FORK OF THE CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 10' BITUMINOUS TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON (NORTH OF SHOPKO) Chairman Arndt opened the hearing at 7:05 p.m. with the reading of publication #6164 as published in Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 Page 6 the Hutchinson Leader on Thursday, May 4, 2000. Ms. Kraft presented the request and displayed photographs showing the area of the proposed trail. Tt� Commission discussed the trail route. Mr. Haugen moved to close the hearing at 7:06 p.m. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mr. Kirchoff moved to approve with the following conditions: sift fencing must installed during construction and restoration of the slope must be completed before silt fencing may be removed. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. Motion to approve with listed conditions carried unanimously. 4. NEW BUSINESS a) CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY HOERNEMANN TRUST (SECTION 7 OF HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) Ms. Wischnack explained that since the Hoememann Trust was still one parcel, a lot split was needed. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the lot split. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion to approve carried unanimously. b) CONSIDERATION OF A LOT SPLIT AS REQUESTED BY CURTIS AND JANEL REITER (760 CENTURY AVENUE SW) Ms. Kraft explained the request and displayed the survey showing the proposed split. She added that since this was in the I/C District, there were no minimum lot dimensions. Mr. Westlund moved to approve the lot split. Mr. Olsen seconded the motion. Motion to approv� carried unanimously. 5. OLD BUSINESS a) DISCUSSION OF HOME OCCUPATION REVISIONS TO ZONING ORDINANCE Ms. Wischnack stated that staff had received many requests asking about home occupations. She added that the current regulations probably do not are feasible and should be changed. She asked the Commission their feelings of pursuing amendments to the home occupation language in the Ordinance. Mr. Kirchoff moved to have staff draft possible changes to the home occupation language in the Ordinance. Mr. Jones seconded the motion. Motion carried. b) DISCUSSION OF ZONING OF SOUTH GRADE ROAD AREA NEAR DALE STREET (COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL MIX) Ms. Wischnack explained that in this newly annexed area there was a unique mix of residential and commercial properties. She gave the example of a cabinet shop with one employee who can not currently expand the business because it is a non - conforming use. John Slyter, the business owner, stated that he was assessed as commercial property and felt this was unfair since he could not expand this use. Ms. Wischnack stated that staff felt that many of the uses in the area would be too commercially intense to qualify as home occupations. She did suggest that this could be made a special zoning distre similar to the I/C in which all of the uses would be only conditionally permitted. There was discussion of what some the possible regulations for such a district could be. Mr. Slyter stated that he felt it was important that there be a limit on the number of employees. Mr. Jones suggested that the size of the business buildings could be proportionate to the size of the lots. Minutes Planning Commission — May 16, 2000 Page 7 6. COMMUNICATION FROM STAFF • Ms. Kraft presented the tentative agenda for June. 7. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, Mr. Jones moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 p.m. Mr. Westlund seconded the motion. Motion carried. • 1 1 ✓ v v bids if approved at Public Hearing ♦ An Assessment Hearing is to be held after bids, prior to award of contract ♦ Actual final assessment costs to be calculated for Assessment Hearing based on the actual project. costs. ♦ Interest rate will be determined by rate that city receives for the project bonds. The actual interest rate on the assessments will be 1% over the rate of the bond. Depending on changes in the economy, the rate is expected to be between 6.5 and 7.5% PAYMENT OPTIONS: ♦ Full payment without interest by November 15th ♦ After November 15th, the assessments are certified to tax rolls, with interest ♦ Assessment on Tax Roll, 10 years with interest, Equal Principal ♦ Deferment available for property owners, meeting income guidelines, who are either over 65 years old or disabled. p.m. PROJECT COST Construction Cost $158 Expenses $ 38,031.50 TOTAL $196 City Share Street/Storm Sewer $ 130,076.96 Assessable Costs Water Service $ 909.73 Street/Storm Sewer $ 65,509.40 TOTAL $196 Water Service: Street Assessment: ASSESSMENTS Estimated $800 - 950 /each $45 — 55 /front foot Typical Proposed Assessment Standard 66' Lot $2 — 3,630 Actual $909.73 $60.50' $3,993 Notes * Actual street costs came in at $73.18 /front foot, significantly over estimates. Cost variance from estimate due to level of storm sewer reconstruction, cost of tile lines and especially the higher cost of bituminous. Proposed rate is 10% over top of estimated range at Public Hearing. COUNCIL/NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT OPTIONS. 1. Approve Assessment Roll as proposed by Engineer. 2. Do not approve Assessment Roll for Project No. 00 -09. Readvertise Assessment Hearing at $73.18 /front foot or other rate Do not approve Assessment Roll. Do not award project. Rebid and complete new Hearing process in 2001. F:�(iR(JL�FSEIGINVI.pmewex Prgi�uVfmvrR110P01AVaa -l6.bc ,� / ( ` PROJECT COST Construction Cost $ 49,444.80 Expenses $ 11.866.75 TOTAL City Share 80% of Utility Cost` $ 37,414.27 Assessable Costs Street (Wear Course) $ 14,543.71 20% of Utilitv Cost' $ 9.353.57 111911.11 *Bituminous Wear Course: 'North side /per lot 2 North side /per unit (1/3) South Side Sewer and Water Service: $ 61,311.55 $ 61 ASSESSMENTS Estimated Actual $750- 880 /lot $1,211.98/lot $250- 295 /each $403.99 /unit $500 -580 $661.08/lot $690- 800 /lot $850.32/lot Notes: • Costs were higher than expected, mainly due to higher petroleum/bituminous prices. ' Assessment Agreement made with Developer due to extra costs of preliminary extension of utilities and street with no provisions to local service. 2 Assessments to be per lot, as noted in Subdivision Agreement. Units built on north side include 6 -unit structures over 2 lots. For the corner lots •pn Morningside Court, 3 units assigned (by parcel number) each lot. F: kiROUPSEM":fMli.po.e�n. Pry4�u'Neal.g11000UuuLb.dr April 4,2000 * 6:00 p.m. disturbance. Project expected to be completed in July or August. Assessments • As noted in the Subdivision Agreement, all costs associated with the development are assessed to properties within the plat on a per unit basis. • Based on expected bid prices, the Estimated Cost Per Lot is $1,100 to $1,300 • Actual final assessment rate will be based on the bid price received. n 6� GUmprovement Projec tsU-karing\2000\PUB- L6- 13.doc f I 1 1 �7 3 '1 5 • Construction of 3 /4" wear course bituminous surface. Requires minimal PROJECT COST Construction Cost $144 Expenses $ 34,711.38 TOTAL $179,343.93 Assessable Costs Sanitary Sewer $ 34 Watermain $ 42 Street and Storm $102,078.91 TOTAL $179,343.93 ASSESSMENTS 0 Estimated Actual Sanitary Sewer: $6,600- 7,500 /lot $5 Watermain: $9,300- 10,600 /lot $7 Street/Storm: $16,300 - 18,500 /lot $17O 13.15 TOTAL $32,200 — 36,600/lot $29,890.66 Notes 1. 1978 Subdivision Agreement requested complete construction of infrastructure in 1979 and assessments split per lot. 2. Owner of 5 of 6 lots unsure of potential future use of property. May be sold and/or replatted. Two options reviewed for street layout. Higher of 2 options shown based on existing plat. 3. Consideration should be given to only completing Sanitary Sewer in 2000 due to need beyond immediate plat. F:IGRMTYEYGfA'JwpowweM ProJeruV/eoinglS000Uucv -L6Jx �1 Gavin blson Sayre Ltd. GAVIN LAW BUILDING 1017 HENNEPIN AVENUE GLENCOE, MINNESOTA 55336 -2287 PHONE (320) 864 -5142 METRO LINE (612) 467 -2994 FAX (320) 864 -5146 JODY L. WINTERS Attorney at Law • RECENED MAY 2 6 2000 CRY of Hutchinson May 25, 2000 City Administrator Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: State of Minnesota v. Chet and Associates and the Property Known as Michael Court Dear Mr. Plotz: As you know, I represent Chet Hoversten also known as Chet and Associates with regard to the Michael Court property. On May 23, 2000, the City adopted a resolution to continue with the sanitary sewer for the Michael Court property but elected not to continue with the street and water main. Please send me a copy of the resolution so that I may have it in my file for appeal purposes. If you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, / �r Jody Winters JW /jd cc: Chet Hoversten ,j �1 OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT . TO: City of Hutchinson COPY FOR YOUR Honorable Ma and Council Members INFORMATION Please take notice that Chet & Associates as owners of Lot 2, Block 1, Boyle's Addition, City Parcel No. 30- 117 -29 -14 -0020 and County Parcel No. 23.398.0020 hereby makes its objection to the proposed Assessment Rule Number 5039 that pertains to Lot 2, Block 1, Boyle's Addition in the amount of $29,890.66 and all according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 particularly Section 429.061 Subd. 2. The basis for the objection is that; a. The City of Hutchinson has failed to give notice to Chet & Associates of the initial hearing concerning the establishment of this project in that notice was sent to a former address rather than the address shown on the McLeod County Tax Rolls as required by law, and accordingly the notice of the hearing was received after the hearing, thus depriving Chet & Associates of their opportunity to be heard in opposition to this project. • b. The City of Hutchinson has not conducted an appraisal of the property owned by Chet & Associates for the purpose of determining its fair market value, and the expected fair market value after the completion of the proposed improvement. C. The proposed amount of assessment is much greater than any resulting benefit to the property as measured by increase in the fair market value of the property by reason of the proposed improvement. The undersigned enters this objection with the City of Hutchinson for the purpose of forming the basis for the appeal to the District Court if the City adopts the assessment as proposed, including any adjusted amount which is greater than the increase than the value of the property resulting from the improvement. Dated this 23`" day of May, 2000. • CHET & ASSOCIATES By: Chet Hoversten, Its Authorized Partner UIUSERSV,erry0\CNff Chet & AssodatesV_d 2Jv OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT • TO: City of Hutchinson Honorable Mayor and Council Members Please take notice that Chet & Associates as owners of Lot 3, Block 1, Boyle's Addition, City Parcel No. 30- 117 -29 -14 -0030 and County Parcel No. 23.398.0030 hereby makes its objection to the proposed Assessment Rule Number 5039 that pertains to Lot 3, Block 1, Boyle's Addition in the amount of $29,890-66 and all according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 particularly Section 429.061 Subd. 2. The basis for the objection is that; a. The City of Hutchinson has failed to give notice to Chet & Associates of the initial hearing concerning the establishment of this project in that notice was sent to a former address rather than the address shown on the McLeod County Tax Rolls as required by law, and accordingly the notice of the hearing was received after the hearing, thus depriving Chet & Associates of their opportunity to be heard in opposition to this project. b. The City of Hutchinson has not conducted an appraisal of the property owned by Chet & Associates for the purpose of dete its fair market value, and the expected fair market value after the completion of the proposed improvement. C. The proposed amount of assessment is much greater than any resulting benefit to the property as measured by increase in the fair market value of the property by reason of the proposed improvement. The undersigned enters this objection with the City of Hutchinson for the purpose of forming the basis for the appeal to the District Court if the City adopts the assessment as proposed, including any adjusted amount which is greater than the increase than the value of the property resulting from the improvement. Dated this 23' day of May, 2000. 161 .1Z.YVV3.3.91N01 *1 • By: Chet Hoversten, Its Authorized Partner U:IUSERS\HsrryOlgMlChet & AssodsWe Iot 3.Iv OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT to TO: City of Hutchinson Honorable Mayor and Council Members Please take notice that Chet & Associates as owners of Lot 4, Block 1, Boyle's Addition, City Parcel No. 30- 117 -29 -14 -0040 and County Parcel No. 23.398.0040 hereby makes its objection to the proposed Assessment Rule Number 5039 that pertains to Lot 4, Block 1, Boyle's Addition in the amount of $29,890.66 and all according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 particularly Section 429.061 Subd. 2. The basis for the objection is that; a. The City of Hutchinson has failed to give notice to Chet & Associates of the initial hearing concerning the establishment of this project in that notice was sent to a former address rather than the address shown on the McLeod County Tax Rolls as required by law, and accordingly the notice of the hearing was received after the hearing, thus depriving Chet & Associates of their opportunity to be heard in opposition to this project. b. The City of Hutchinson has not conducted an appraisal of the property owned by Chet & Associates for the purpose of determining its fair market value, and the expected fair market value after the completion of the proposed improvement. C. The proposed amount of assessment is much greater than any resulting benefit to the property as measured by increase in the fair market value of the property by reason of the proposed improvement. The undersigned enters this objection with the City of Hutchinson for the purpose of forming the basis for the appeal to the District Court if the City adopts the assessment as proposed, including any adjusted amount which is greater than the increase than the value of the property resulting from the improvement. Dated this 23` day of May, 2000. CHET & ASSOCIATES n LJ By: Chet Hoversten, Its Authorized Partner UAUSERSW*ny0 ChMChet & Assowatms Lat 4Jv OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT TO: City of Hutchinson Honorable Mayor and Council Members Please take notice that Chet & Associates as owners of Lot 5, Block 1, Boyle's Addition, City Parcel No. 30- 117 -29 -14 -0050 and County Parcel No. 23.398.0050 hereby makes its objection to the proposed Assessment Rule Number 5039 that pertains to Lot 5, Block 1, Boyle's Addition in the amount of $29,890.66 and all according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 particularly Section 429.061 Subd. 2. The basis for the objection is that; a. The City of Hutchinson has failed to give notice to Chet & Associates of the initial hearing concerning the establishment of this project in that notice was sent to a former address rather than the address shown on the McLeod County Tax Rolls as required by law, and accordingly the notice of the hearing was received after the hearing, thus depriving Chet & Associates of their opportunity to be heard in opposition to this project. b. The City of Hutchinson has not conducted an appraisal of the property owned by Chet & Associates for the purpose of dete its fair market value, and the expected fair market value after the completion of the proposed improvement. C. The proposed amount of assessment is much greater than any resulting benefit to the property as measured by increase in the fair market value of the property by reason of the proposed improvement. The undersigned enters this objection with the City of Hutchinson for the purpose of forming the basis for the appeal to the District Court if the City adopts the assessment as proposed, including any adjusted amount which is greater than the increase than the value of the property resulting from the improvement. Dated this 23r day of May, 2000. 0 CHET & ASSOCIATES By: Chet Hoversten, Its Authorized Partner U:SUSERSU(erry0\CM1\Chet & AssockftsLLot 5.Iv OBJECTION TO ASSESSMENT TO: City of Hutchinson Honorable Mayor and Council Members Please take notice that Chet & Associates as owners of Lot 6, Block 1, Boyle's Addition, City Parcel No. 30- 117 -29 -14 -0060 and County Parcel No. 23.298.0060 (23.398.0060) hereby makes its objection to the proposed Assessment Rule Number 5039 that pertains to Lot 6, Block 1, Boyle's Addition in the amount of $29,890.66 and all according to the provisions of Minnesota Statute Chapter 429 particularly Section 429.061 Subd. 2. The basis for the objection is that; a. The City of Hutchinson has failed to give notice to Chet & Associates of the initial hearing concerning the establishment of this project in that notice was sent to a former address rather than the address shown on the McLeod County Tax Rolls as required by law, and accordingly the notice of the hearing was received after the hearing, thus depriving Chet & Associates of their opportunity to be heard in opposition to this project. b. The City of Hutchinson has not conducted an appraisal of the property owned by Chet & Associates for the purpose of dete its fair market value, and the expected fair market value after the completion of the proposed improvement. C. The proposed amount of assessment is much greater than any resulting benefit to the property as measured by increase in the fair market value of the property by reason of the proposed improvement. The undersigned enters this objection with the City of Hutchinson for the purpose of forming the basis for the appeal to the District Court if the City adopts the assessment as proposed, including any adjusted amount which is greater than the increase than the value of the property resulting from the improvement. Dated this 23` day of May, 2000. CHET & ASSOCIATES `J By: Chet Hoversten, Its Authorized Partner U:WSERSU,erry0NCN=het & AssociatwU-d 6.kr RESOLUTION NO. 11480 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6/PROJECT NOS. 00-09100-12100-13100-17 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of Project No. 00 -09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by constriction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00 -12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman's 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00-13 8th Avenue SW in Hunters Ridge by construction of bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: • 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made apart hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it- 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period often (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of pe rcent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31 st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. • Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11481 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT • LETTING NO. 6 PROJECT NOS. 99 -20, 00 -09, 00 -12, 00 -13, 00 -14, 00 -16, 00 -17, 00 -18, 00 -19 Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the improvement of Project No. 99 -20: 8th Avenue SW from School Road to West Termini by construction of trail completion and wear course, sidewalk and appurtenances; Project No. 00-09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00-12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman's 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -13 8th Avenue SW in Hunter's Ridge by construction of bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. GO-14 Crow River Recreation Area — Trail Head Improvements — Old Simonson Lumber Site by construction of parking lot, trail and sidewalk and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -16 Dale Street SW from South Grade Road SW to 8th Avenue SW by construction of trail, sidewalk and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, waterrnain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; Project No. 00-18 Fair Avenue SE from Adams Street SE to Jefferson Street SE by construction of storm sewer, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; Project No. 00-19 Sidewalk and Alley Panel Program - Citywide repair and maintenance program by removal, repair, and construction of concrete sidewalk, panels and appurtenances; and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Bidder Amount Bid Duininck Bros, Inc. of Prinsburg MN $567,723.02 Wm..Mueller & Sons, Inc. of Hamburg MN $585,146.25 and whereas, it appears that Duininck Bros., Inc. of Prinsburg MN is the lowest responsible bidder. RESOLUTION NO. 11481 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT LETTING NO. 61PROJECT NOS. 99 -20, 00 -09, 00 -12, 00 -13, 00 -14, 00 -16, 00 -17, 00 -18, 00 -19 PAGE 2 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract Duininck Bros., Inc. of Prinsburg MN, in the amount of $567,723.02, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the Director of Engineering. 2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until satisfactory completion of the contract. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 23rd day of May, 2000. Mayor City Administrator Hutchinson Fire Department 205 P Ave SE Hutchinson N N 55350 320 -234 -4211 May 12, 2000 To: Mayor, Council and City Administrator From: Brad Emans, Fire Chief Re: Bid opening for the city/rural shared rescue vehicle We were to have bid opening for this project on June 12, 2000. The committee has run into a problem with getting the specifications put together in a manor that the project could come in within the guide lines approved by • the council and the township. In other words we can't seem to find a way to get the vehicle we need for the money we have appropriated. I have instructed them to go back to the drawing board and find a way to shave cost and still get a nice, workable vehicle. It is my feeling the economy has something to do with the fact most of the manufactures are not real hungry for business right now. The new bid opening date will be July 17, 2000. We will accept bids for the vehicle until 5:00 p.m. and open the bids at 5:30 p.m. in the council chambers. If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact me directly at 234 -4211. Thank You. L 7 —A I Fo ✓ Mav 17, 2000 Citv of Hutchinson Engineenng/ Public Works MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS 1400 Adams St SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir. Subject: Sale of surplus property McLeod County and the City of Hutchinson routinely share equipment. Under this proposal, the County will purchase a unit no longer used by the City. The County is proposing to purchase a Rosco 8' pull-type power sweeper, which will not run without work and which their crews have been the only ones to use the sweeper in the last five years. They are offering to trade a main broom for our street sweeper (value $325 + for the pull-tvpe sweeper. The County uses the broom for sweeping up after sealcoats. Because of our construction methods, sealcoating is no longer a routine event in the City. We do, however, always have a need to purchase two or three main brooms for our street sweeper each year. This is another ezatnple of sharing and using equipment most effectively. The City wins by removing an unused piece from its inventory, and getting a main broom we would need to purchase. The County wins by g aining another unit that, with some work, will be used for sweeping sealcoat. 0 �'-74 VISION STATEMENT OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON We will make the best use of community resources to provide and d eliver quality services that are nexib a } *� the citizens o f H utchinso n , our 1�ustomer-s- r . e� -t _ .. We will limit barriers while facilitating positive and orderly growth through long range planning. We will be proactive with our customers, promoting their involvement while building trust and accountability. We will be a model to other communities by promoting innovation and cost efficiency through partnerships with private business, government and public entities. We will balance growth of the community and the protection of our natural surroundings. We will provide a positive environment to empower employees; this will be essential to plan, develop and deliver quality services. City Council Vision Statements HUTCHINSON will be the "Top Quality Place" to l live in Minnesota HUTCHINSON will be the best managed /motivated city in the. USA (city /school /industry) HUTCHINSON will be the model city for sound fiscal management HUTCHINSON will be the #wit apt 10 in o t greeter Minnesota for sa�i�d economic growth HUTCHINSON will be the are hub of choice for retail, h ok *, banking, dining, and entertainment 1 HUTCHINSON will be recognized as the leader in public safety programs that partnership with citizens, industry, and institutions HUTCHINSON parks, facilities, and programs will reflect the needs of residents, neighborhoods, and visitors HUTCHINSON will facilitate a planned approach to accommodate a full mix of housing - HUTCHINSON will have a convenient, accessible a state of th e ar transportation system that reflects the,nee& of .the community n HUTCHINSON -411 be the # city i outet .tu M inneso ta TAM i/ dustri -a gr owth HUTCHINSON will be the model city for - governmental and private partnerships HUTCHINSON will reflect concern for the environment in all decision - making processes City Of It OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 23 -MAY -2000 (15:411 page 1 __________ 16 _______ __ ______ ______-______-________-____-______ _____-- TIDS JOHNSON, LEONARD G. JUNE PAYMENT _- __________-- $812. _______ - -_ - 6 <.> $612.76' BAKKEN, ROGER 1998 IMPROV. D.S FIRSTAR BANK OF MIl ITES'JTA AGENT FEES $150.:0 BARCLAY, STACY <,> $150.00• BAUERLY BROS INC. 1999 IMPR. CONS SRF CONSULTING GROUP 2000 IMPR. CONST DUININCK BROS INC. OTTO ASSOCIATES PELLINEN, WILLARD AIRPORT RENOVAT. HUTCHINSON TEL CO CAP.IMPRO.FUND B & R GROWERS CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY DLT SOLUTUIONS E.J. PINSKE BLDRS NEUBARTH, JULI CENTRAL GARAGE APWA BRANDON TIRE CO CARQUEST AUTO PARTS DYNA SYSTEMS GARD SPECIALISTS HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY INTERSTATE BATTERIES JERRYS TRANSMISSION • MANKATO MACK SALES NO STATES SUPPLY INC PENSKE AUTO CENTER PLOWMANS REINER CONTRACTING SNAP ON TOOLS CORP TERMINAL SUPPLY CO WICHTERMAN, KEN ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS PROFESS SERV- CENTURY, DALE L4/99 EST 47 CONST OBSERV- ROLLING MEADOWS LAND SURVEYING- ROLLING MEADOWS TRAINING ROOM CHAIRS & TABLES 28 FLATS FLOWERS TREES /SHRUBS UPGRADE SUBSCRIPTION FRONT EDGE OF BLEACHERS MATERIALS /LIONS PARK SIGN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TIRES, MOUNT, BALANCE CREDIT RETURNS SHOP PARTS SHOP PARTS HYDRO TESTS, PIN, BAR SHOP PARTS PARTS, LABOR- REPAIR TACT VAN PARTS HARDWARE PARTS, LABOR- POLICE #3 PARTS, LABOR JD DOZER PG PLIER SET FLASHERS REIMB -MEALS BAFFLE STRIP ENERGY LOAN FD LANG &, RANDY DOORS GENERAL FUND ADULT TRAINING & HABILITATION REFUND -COND USE PERMIT AG SYSTEMS PARTS AMCON BLOCK CONC BLOCK, DELIVERY AMERICAN BOTTLING CO, THE POP PURCHASE ANDERSON'S DECORATING CENTER PAINT ANOKA COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRAT BAIL MONEY -SEE ATTACHED APWA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARNOLD & MCDOWELL MILEAGE /TIME -SUSAN STONE MEMBERSHIP DUES -J RODEBERG DOCK CAPS MN POLICE BRIEFS SUBSCRIPTION TRAVEL EXPENSES REIMS- SAFETY SHOES REFUND TREE APPLICATION PROFESS SERV- SURFACE WATER PLN FOOTING REG -JASON MATHWIG PROFESS SERV - FRANCHISE RENEW MAY POP PURCHASE BEDDING PLANTS TRIANGULAR SCALE DEVELOP & PRINT $17,016.36 $17,016.36* $15,582.00 $2,669.69 $708.00 $18,959.69" $3,727.50 $3,727.50' $238.00 $412.07 $276.00 $9,952.00 $300.00 $11,178.07• $13.00 $44.24 $328.30 $113.11 $306.85 $35.89 $58.52 $2,038.15 $201.75 $120.43 $391.03 $64.54 $170.00 $67.84 $101.30 $5.31 $114.81 $4,175.07+ $3,302.01 $3, 302.01* $300.00 $50.74 $1,353.26 $64.45 $56.45 $520.00 $13.00 $94.70 $92.00 $22.37 $85.00 $230.00 $39.97 $15.00 $189.00 $1,464.74 $200.00 $667.50 $793.00 $86.49 $51.91 $7.86 /O - / G ' ASQC B & B SPORTS BAERTSCHI & ASSC BAKKEN, ROGER BANDASS, SARAH BARCLAY, STACY BARR ENGINEERING CO BAUERLY BROS INC. is BCA /TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT BERNICK & LIFSON BERNICKS PEPSI COLA BROWNS GREENHOUSE CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY CAMERA SHOP MEMBERSHIP DUES -J RODEBERG DOCK CAPS MN POLICE BRIEFS SUBSCRIPTION TRAVEL EXPENSES REIMS- SAFETY SHOES REFUND TREE APPLICATION PROFESS SERV- SURFACE WATER PLN FOOTING REG -JASON MATHWIG PROFESS SERV - FRANCHISE RENEW MAY POP PURCHASE BEDDING PLANTS TRIANGULAR SCALE DEVELOP & PRINT $17,016.36 $17,016.36* $15,582.00 $2,669.69 $708.00 $18,959.69" $3,727.50 $3,727.50' $238.00 $412.07 $276.00 $9,952.00 $300.00 $11,178.07• $13.00 $44.24 $328.30 $113.11 $306.85 $35.89 $58.52 $2,038.15 $201.75 $120.43 $391.03 $64.54 $170.00 $67.84 $101.30 $5.31 $114.81 $4,175.07+ $3,302.01 $3, 302.01* $300.00 $50.74 $1,353.26 $64.45 $56.45 $520.00 $13.00 $94.70 $92.00 $22.37 $85.00 $230.00 $39.97 $15.00 $189.00 $1,464.74 $200.00 $667.50 $793.00 $86.49 $51.91 $7.86 /O - / G ' CFEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 23 -MAY -2000 (15:41) page 2 ___ ____ ____ _______ _ _____ _ _______-___________-___-_____________-______-__--________- 3ENERAL FUND CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD REPORT COVERS $9.59 CENTRAL GARAGE APRIL REPAIRS $27,336.25 CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY TREES $224.46 • CHAMPLAIN PLANNING PRESS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $190.00 CHRISTENSEN, KATHY REFUND - CANCELLED DEF DRIVING 516.00 CITY ENGINEERS ASSC OF MINNESO 2000 MEMB DUES- RODEBERG :40.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON BP #15540 - SURCHARGE ONLY $13.50 COAST TO COAST SUPPLIES $302.15 COSORN ENTERPRISES INC. SUPPLIES $41.11 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN LETTING #4 ADVERTISEMENT $1,464.90 CROW RIVER AREA QUALITY COUNCI MAY SESSION $60.00 CROW RIVER VET CLINIC ROUTINE EXAM - $350.24 CUSTOM HEADSETS INC HEADSET, EARMOLDS, AMPS $511.78 DAAK REFRIGERATION REPAIR /SERVICE AIR CONDITIONER $85.28 DAKOTA CTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE REG -JACOB MAY $250.00 DANIELSON CONSTRUCTION COUNTER TOP MATERIALS & LABOR $360.00 DEAN, TERRY REFUND TREE APPLICATION $15.00 DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES DNR FEES TO STATE $946.00 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY EXEMPTION BILLING 530.00 DLT SOLUTUIONS AUTOCAD UPC; SUBSCRIPTIONS $748.00 DOMINO'S PIZZA PIZZA, POP $27.70 DOOR SERVICE OF ST. CLOUD LABOR $80.00 DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE CO ID CHECKING GUIDES $24.95 ECK, JOE REFUND TREE APPLICATION $60.00 ECOLAB PEST ELIM MAY SERVICE $40.79 ELECTRO WATCHMAN QTRLY CHARGE $175.73 ERGOMETRICS VIDEO TEST $318.60 EVIDENCE COLLECTION & PROTECTI EVIDENCE BAGS $186.88 FAMILY REXALL DRUG PHOTOS $8.41 FREIDRICH, JERRY REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS $57.77 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE & RESCUE ADAPTERS $31.00 GALL'S INC GUARD $99.03 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS CO LATERAL FILE $1,346.50 GREG LARSON SPORTS BOCCE SET $42.35 GULF STATE DISTRBUTORS HOLSTERS, BELT KEEPERS $268.75 GUSTAFSON, SHARON REFUND- CANCELLED SKILLS /DRILLS $33.00 HAGER JEWELRY ENGRAVE PLATE $6.25 HANSON, DORI REFUND -TREE APPLICATION $15.00 HARRIS COMPANIES MAY SERVICE INSPECT $525.00 HCVN -TV FRANCHISE PAYMENT $6,958.32 HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT HOODS $170.00 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE /HUTCHINSON KAIKVJR NO TOUCH SYSTEM $791.06 HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER ENDUCRYL $185.32 HOLIDAY INN- EXPRESS BANDANA SQ LODGING -R BAKKEN /L MUELLER $804.56 HUTCH CONVENTION & ADDITIONAL LODGING TAX -MARCH $35.28 HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY EXTING RECHARGE $42.12 HUTCHINSON TEL CO MAY CHARGES $1,129.31 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES STREET LIGHTING $9,823.87 HUTCHINSON, CITY OF FISH & GAME $304.00 IC4A PRODUCT FULFILLMENT CENTE LOCAL GVMT ON -LINE $54.50 IMPERIAL PORTA THRONES UNIT RENTAL- NORT14WOODS PARK $32.48 IND.SCHOOL DIST. #423 MARCH DARE PGM- COFFEE $6,224.00 INDIANHEAD SPECIALTY CO SELF INKING STAMP $32.25 INSTITUTE FOR PROFESSIONAL BUS REG -SONJA MUELLERLEILE $39.00 JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT UNIFORMS $506.06 JEFF'S ELECTRIC OUTDOOR FLOOD LAMPS $138.00 JOHNSON, SANDY REFUND- CANCELLED BASEBALL $28.00 KEITH, KEVIN REFUND -TREE APPLICATION $30.00 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED PROFESS SERV -TOWER ORDINANCE $275.58 KREFT, HOLLY REIMB - MILEAGE $81.90 L & P SUPPLY CO PARTS $457.51 LANG, STEVE HOURS WORKED -BIKE BONANZA $60.00 LASER GRAPHICS SHIRT ORDER $710.02 $343.73 LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY URETHANE 1999 CEAM STANDARD SPECS $35,779.75 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LOEHIZER, ROBERT REIMB - TRAVEL EXP /LESS ADVANCE $40.29 LOGIS APRIL SERVICE $9,$60.02 LUTHENS, MINDY REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS $2,7607.26 MANKATO MOBILE RADIO SHOP SUPPLIES $ 1,501.59 MCLEOD COOP POWER APRIL UTILITY $279.00 MCLEOD COUNTY CHAPTER SKILLS VIDEOS OWNERS & ENCUMBRANCES REPORT $65.00 MCLEOD COUNTY TITLE MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER JOINT PLAN- REZONE NEUBARTH $100.00 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. MAY SERVICE $264.31 $1,925.00 MINDSHARP ASSESSMENT & CONSULTING $5.86 MINI RIFF UNIT RENTAL OPEN -HOLD - OUNCIL REPORT 23 -MAY -2000 (15:41) page 3 _____________________________________________ _________ ERAL FUND MITCHELL, WILLIAM _______ ______ __ ______ UMPIRE GAMES MLINAR, JOHN REIMB- MEALS, MILEAGE MN BOARD OF AELSLAID LICENSE RENEWAL -J RODEBERG MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTA °IC: AIRPORT LICENSE RENEWAL MN REC & PARK ASSC SANCTIONING 14 TEAMS MODERN MAZDA VEHICLE TOW MOLLER, PAM REFUND ADAPTIVE REC EVENT MONAHAN RENO, MICHELLE REFUND- OVERPAID T -HALL MORRISON, MICHELLE REFUND SHELTER RESERVATION MOTOR VEHICLE RELICENSE 2 UNMARKED SQUADS NAGEL, JOSEPH REIMB - MEALS, LODGING, PARKING NAIL REC & PARK ASSC RENEWAL-DOLF MOON NO STATES SUPPLY INC HARDWARE NORA WOMEN'S SOCIETY SR TOUR -24 +2 DINNERS NOTCH, JERRY REFUND - CANCELLED GARDEN PLOT OFFICEMAX INK CARTRIDGES PANKAKE, GARY B HOURS /BIKE BONANZA PAULSON, CLIFF REIMB - SAFETY BOOTS PEDERSON, RYAN REIMB -MEALS PETERSON BUS SERVICE MOTOR COACH TO OLD LOG PETSINGER, MARIE REFUND TREE APPLICATION QUADE ELECTRIC MATERIALS, LABOR -MAINT BLDG R & T SPECIALTY DARE ITEMS RANGE SYSTEMS MATERIALS -SHOOT HOUSE RODEBERG, JOHN REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS & GLOVES RUTHLEDGE, LENNY REIMB- MILEAGE SCHNOBRICH, MARK SCAFFOLDING SECTIONS SCOTT PUBLISHING INC SAFETY CHECK NLS SERVICEMASTER CLEAN CARPETS & FLOORS SHAFFER, GARRISON DRAFT & DESIGN WORK -TRAIN SITE SHERATON INN- MIDWAY LODGING -M HAMMOND- JOHNSON SHOPKO AUDIO CASSETTES SHRED -IT SHREDDING SERVICE SIMONSON LUMBER CO TREATED SMITH, JENNIFER REFUND - REIMBURSED SWIM LESSONS SORENSEN FARM SUPPLY EQUIPMENT RENTAL SOUTHWEST CHAPTER MSPE REG - QUENTIN LARSON ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY REG- BENJAMIN ERLANDSON STANDARD PRINTING NOTARY STAMP, INK STAR TRIBUNE • NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIP THRU 8/23 STEARNS, ROSELLA REFUND SENIOR CLASS STREICHERS HOLSTER SUBWAY BOX LUNCHES SUN LEASING TENT RENTAL SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS COFFEE SWANSON, MARILYN M. REIMB- REGISTRATION, MILEAGE TRI CO WATER COND SALT TWO WAY COMM INC DEC SERVICE U. S. COMPOSTING COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP DUES UNITED BLDG CENTERS REBAR US OFFICE PRODUCTS TASK STOOL VIKING SIGNS PARK SIGNS VULCAN INC SIGNS W.W. SMITH INN SR TOUR -46 PEOPLE WAL -MART CRAFT SUPPLIES WASTE MANAGEMENT MAY EXTRA FURNITURE PICKUP WEST GROUP PAMPHLET WILLIAM MITCHELL COLLEGE OF LA REG - MICHELLE HAMMOND- JOHNSON WISCHNACK, JULIE REIMB- TRANSPARANCIES WORD OF LIFE OUTREACH CENTER REFUND - PARKING LOT PERMIT XEROX CORP COPIER LEASE $175,953.89- HOSPITAL BONDS FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA c�> F [ COMM DEV.0 GRUFRUFF DESIGN LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. e *> AGENT FEES INFO FOLDERS & INSERT PRINTING LEAGUE CONFERENCE MAY SERVICE $105.00 $100.13 $104.00 $15.00 $252.0C $47.91 $5.00 $5.00 $25.00 $10.00 $146.14 $215.00 $277.41 $180.00 $13.00 $323.95 $97.50 $60.00 $70.20 $267.00 $15.00 $93.68 $348.38 $35,292.50 $70.64 $40.95 $700.00 $156.84 $910.58 $225.00 $267.81 $273.67 $54.95 $106.81 $72.00 $310.25 $35.00 $394.00 $253.74 $27.95 $18.00 $257.53 $52.60 $255.60 $119.25 $213.03 $84.67 $2,962.05 $250.00 $924.96 $583.45 $501.40 $283.80 $587.88 $187.53 $70.84 $60.17 $995.00 $129.56 $918.47 $283.75 $175,953.89- $150.00 $150.00' $7,760.00 $295.00 $24.48 58,079.48" HUTCH TRANS FAC. CENTRAL GA RAGE TCHINSON APRIL WATER /WASTEWATER $358.61 C ITY OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 23- MAY -2070 X15:411 page 4 ____________ HUTCH TRANS FAC. _____ ___________ _ _ _ ___ HUTCH FIRE SAFETY H U Y ___--_--____---_______----_-_______-_---_-- EXTING RECHARGE $29.13 HUTCHINSON UTILITIES APRIL "JTILITY $128.77 SCHMELING OIL CO ID TAGS, PUMP FILTERS 5144.83 oi;PERIOR CCFFEF & FOODS COFFEE $78.00 =EK MECHAN =_'.L PLBG MATERIALS $1 -66.15 «� $573.44` NSURANCE FUNDS SUBWAY-SOU­ PLATTER $74.55 < . 1 $74.55* ;,IQUOR STORE & L DISTRIBUTING MAY BEER 532,399.59 DAY DISTRIBUTING MAY BEER 31,662.70 ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO. WINE CREDIT $14,472.08 GRIGGS COOPER & CO MAY LIQUOR $28,373.15 HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE MAY BEER $4,145.00 HENRYS FOODS INC MAY TOBACCO $895.87 HERMEL WHOLESALE TOBACCO PURCHASE $149.18 COHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. MAY WINE $9,783.52 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES QTR 3 OEN LIAR $9 LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC MAY BEER $3, 00.50 LEO'S TRANSFER APRIL /MAY FREIGHT $1,021.95 LOCHER BROS INC MAY BEER $40,252.30 LUNDHOLM, LORI CLEAN WINDOWS $42.60 PAUSTIS & SONS MAY WINE $1,371.38 QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO. MAY LIQUOR $9,461.14 SCENIC VALLEY WINERY MAY WINE $432.00 SIBLEY COUNTY HOLSTEIN ASSOC MN STATE HOLSTEIN SHOW AD $57.50 TRAVELERS DIRECTORY SERVICE HOTEL ADVERTISING $355.00 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY MAY BEER $316.90 WINE MERCHANTS INC MAY WINE $45.50 �.� $149,403.86* PAYROLL FUND AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO. EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $545.00 AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO. EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $54.30 CITY OF HUTCHINSON EE MED INS CONTRIS 5/13/00 $1,972.68 GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO. BE CONTRIB S/13/00 $100.00 H.R.L.A.P.R. EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $213.13 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $2,238.46 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE MN CHILD SUPPORT PYMT 5/13/00 $162.89 PERA LIFE INS CO. EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $132.00 PERA- D.C.P. EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $52.02 PRUDENTIAL EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $75.00 PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $30.00 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $16,811.25 TEMPLETON INC EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $270.00 WADELL & REED EE CONTRIB 5/13/00 $150.00 �.� $22,806.73• SCDP 97 Heg Reh _ROW RIVER TITLE DTED GAP EQUITY -A ERDMAN 518,000.00 HRA ADMIN FEES -A fiRDMAN $700.00 «� 518,700.00* WATER /SEWER FUND AM.WATER WORKS ASSN REVERSE OSMOSIS & NANOFILTER $66.75 BIOCORP 20 GAL BAGS - COMPOSTING PRJCT $3,239.00 CABADA, MIQUEL REFUND - OVERPYMT WATER ACCT $26.89 CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD LINERS, CUPS $146.11 CENTRAL GARAGE APRIL REPAIRS $1,838.89 CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY TREES /SHRUBS $400.00 CITY OF HUTCHINSON POPULUS SIOUXLAND $277.50 D.P.C.IND.INC S02 150# CYLINDER $30.00 DEHLER, CINDY REFUND - OVERPYMT WATER ACCT $15.85 CEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY ENG LIC RENEW- DOUGLAS JOHNSON $10.00 CEVRIES, RANDY REIMB -MEALS $38.49 DYNA SYSTEMS PARTS $1,397.24 EAST CENTRAL SOLID WASTE COMMI LANDFILL CHARGES $247.83 ELECTRIC MOTOR CO BEARINGS, FAN $171.39 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAIN REFUND -PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 - LECTRO WATCHMAN MAGNET $200.56 FASTENAL COMPANY HDWE $31.69 GGPHER STATE CONTRACTORS APRIL CALLS $139.65 GRAMBOW, BOB REFUND- OVERPYMT WATER ACCT $47.82 OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 23 -MAY -2000 (15:41) page 5 ---------------------------------------------------------- WATER /SEWER FUND HACH COMPANY ----- --- - - -- - LAB SUPPLIES $474.57 ` - - - - -- HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CONTAINER IEMURPAGE $45.00 • HENP.Y S, ASSGCIATES METER PARTS $269.90 HUT"H PLBG & HTG CO PLBG PARTS $90.10 HUT_HINSON '-TILITIES APRIL UTIL:T"7 $491.22 INFRATECH MATERIALS, LABOR- MANHOLES $4,176.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES INC ENMET OXYGEN $120.93 JEFF'S - -LE - -'o IC MATERIALS, LABOR-WWTP $976.13 KHC CCNTRU_7IQN REFUND PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 LAE SAFETY SUPPLY INC SAFETY SUPPLIES $138.58 LA.MPLIGHTEP. II MEAL $202.54 LEAGUE OF YN CITIES LEAGUE CONFERENCE $4,205.00 LOGIS APRIL SER`112E $2,849.16 LTP ENTERPRISES PARTS $31.63 MAPLEWOOD ACADEMY REFUND- DOUBLE PYMT CLOSED ACCT $19.89 MCC INC SIOSOLIDS DRYING FACIL -48 $66,186.00 MET -CON COMPANIES REFUND -PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 MID -MN HOT MIX INC 41 B WEAR $166.97 MIDWEST WIRELESS COMM. MAY SERVICE $78.97 MINNESOTA BIOSOLIDS RECYCLING STATE FAIR EXPENSES $75.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH REG -DICK EBERT $68.00 MN RURAL WATER ASSC. MEMBERSHIP $175.00 MN VALLEY TESTING LAB LAB TESTS $419.25 NALCO CHEMICAL CO. CORROSION INHIBITOR $6,025.26 NCL LAB SUPPLIES $509.16 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP SERVICE WORK $120.00 PRECISION SCIENTIFIC TEMP CONTROL $355.04 PROCHASKA, JOYCE REFUND- OVERPYMT CLOSED ACCT $31.44 PASKE BLDG SYSTEMS REFUND PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 REALTY PLUS REFUND- OVERPYMT CLOSED ACCT $7.77 REMEDIATION MGMT CONSULTANTS WWTF ER DOCUMENT $337.50 RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE LODGING -DICK EBERT $371.82 SALONEK CONCRETE & CONST REFUND -PLAN & SPEC FEE $53.25 SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL APRIL LOADS $10,652.95 STARKE, MARK CHISEL PLOWING $160.00 T.I.P. INC TELESCOPING RADIAL CONVEYOR $39,355.00 TRI CO WATER COND SALT $16.93 UNITED BLDG CENTERS PLYWOOD $50.16 US FILTER /WATERPRO WATEROUS EXTENSION KIT $1,102.54 • USA BLUE BOOK PARTS $303.93 VWR SCIENTIFIC INC FURNACE $1,385.65 WATERMAN INDUSTRIES PARTS $840.54 +> $151,677.44* H.A.T.S. FUND M DEPT OF REVENLZ- ffi. SALES TAX LIQ" Fm MN DEPP OF REVHMe-LIQUOR SALES TAX $587,140.85* $346.00 20.454.00 6.970.00 247.00 is MEMO 05/19/00 TO: CITY STAFF & BANK OFFICIALS FROM: KEN MERRILL , FINANCE DIRECTOR SUBJECT: JUNE WIRE TRANSFER The following funds need to be wired - interest payments 62,117.50 Chase NYC ABA # 021 - 000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & Co. c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Dividend Deposit Account # 066 - 026776 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 DDA # 00503179 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 14,763.75 1994 Wastewater Refunding 47,353.75 62,117.50 i The following funds need to be wired - PRINCIPAL payments Chase NYC ABA # 021 -000 -021 to credit the account of Cede & • Co. c/o THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY for Redemption Deposit Account # 066 - 027 -306 OBI FIELD - PA 50317950 1992 Tax Increment Bonds 1994 Wastewater Refunding 30,000.00 525,000.00 555,000.00 (FAX of bond document must be made at same time for principal payment) PAYROLL ACCOUNT - PAYROLL OF MAY 19, 2000 PERIOD ENDING: 05!13100 FOR COUNCIL LIST ONLY - ELECTRONIC TRANSFER TO STATE AND IRS DO NOT ISSUE CHECKS FOR THIS PAGE AMOUNT $17,322.26 $9,718.88 $443.61 $27,484.75 $ 6,034.68 $4,127.81 $10,162.49 $37,647.24 $6,810.31 Finance Director Approval PEID ACCT# NAME 0140 9995 -2081 WITH. TAX ACCOUNT 0140 9995 -2226 0140 9995 -2228 Sub -Total - Employee Contribution 0140 9995 -2226 0140 9995 -2228 Sub -Total - Employer Contribution Grand Total - Withholding Tax Account DESCRIPTION Employee Contribution - Federal Tax Employee Contribution - Soc. Security Employee Contribution - Medicare Employer Contribution - Social Security Employer Contribution - Medicare 9995 -2082 MN DEPT OF REVENUE IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT 23 -MAY -2000 (15:56) page GENERAL FUND _ ____ DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ---- ---------- -------- DNR FEES TO STATE - - - - -- $1,974.00 __- HUTCHINSON, CITY OF FISH & GAME TO STATE $905.50 MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA BAIL MONEY -SEE ATTACHED $250.00 MN DEPT OF HEALTH PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION $150.00 MPCA PERMIT APPLICATION $480.00 SIBLEY COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA BAIL MONEY -SEE ATTACHED $525.00 STEARNS COUNTY COURT ADMINISTR BAIL MONEY -SEE ATTACHED $165.00 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES PHONE SUPPORT $94.00 < *> $4,563.50* LIQUOR STORE AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY ROLL DIVIDERS $482.04 CITY OF HUTCHINSON LOTTERY PAYMENT TO STATE $3,215.31 CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN PAYROLL 5/5/00 $9,109.07 < *> $12,806.42* WATER /SEWER FUND ASHBROOK ROLLER,BASIC COMP KIT $185,544.00 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS FREIGHT- BAGGED COMPOST $2,717.59 MEEKER COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA FINE PYMT- JOHNSON $735.00 < *> $188,996.59* $206,366.51* 4 V In Reply, Please Refer to ^\ File No. a \ ` � U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Academy Quantico, Virginia 22135 May 11, 2000 Mr. Steven C. Madson Chief of Police Hutchinson Police Services 10 Franklin Street, SW Hutchinson, Minnesota 55350 -2464 Dear Chief Madson: I am writing to thank you and the people of Hutchinson for opening your public safety training facility to the North Central Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar, Supervisory Special Agent Robert E. Lee, Jr., has advised me of your gracious assistance to the program and the quality of your training facility. As a Law Enforcement Executive Development Seminar graduate, you know that this training fills a much needed gap in executive training for law enforcement. Without the help of partners like you, backed by a community which cares, such seminars could not be provided. I thank you for allowing the influence of leadership training to be extended into the heartland where it is so vitally needed. Your support and guidance to the group is, itself, an example of the kind of leadership needed in our profession. Your community should be proud of you and the efforts of your agency. Sincerely yours, ( � Llefy Inbotham� Assistant Director F- I c_oneerlana Library System Board Meeting March 16, 2000 The March meeting was called to order by Chair Harlan Madsen at ?:34 p.m. in the Willmar Public Library. Roll was taken. Motion by Marleen Canfield to approve the agenda with the following changes and additions: iV.A.3. IV.B.4. 199 MN Public Library Rpt moved to S. Law Library and 6. Auditors letter added to IV.B. by Al Clouse. Book fines topic added to VI. New Business Carried. New members were introduced. Motion by Gary Johnson to approve February minutes. Second by Francis Schweiss. Carried. The Executive Committee report was presented by Chair Harlan Madsen. There were no objections or comments to the committee appointments so committees will stand as appointed. The attendance roster for the year has been added to the standard mailing packet. LDS On-Line report presented as an FYI. The Finance Committee report was presented by Al Clouse Revenue/ Expenditure reports for January/ February reports are not complete as the auditors have just finished 1999. They will be available next month. Al Clouse motioned to approve the December `99 Revenue/ Expenditure report. Second by Robin deCathelineau. Ivey Vonderharr questioned the equipment rental jump. Al Clouse noted that the legal fees due to the new Joint - Powers agreement were due largely in December. Carried. Motion by Al Clouse to send Kathy, Beth and Jean to the American Library Association conference in Chicago for about $1100. Second by Ramona Berg - perry. Carried. Motion by Al Clouse to sign the LSTA Grant contract. Second by Amy Wilde. Carried. Auditor will be at May meeting for questions. Dir. John Houlahan commented on the Revenues and the grant income/ expenditures portions of the audit. Kandiyohi County has hired a person to work the Law Library. Motion by Al Clouse to sign the Law Library Service Contract. Second by Marleen Canfield. There was discussion on what the law library is and how it works. Nancy Grussing briefly explained the contract. Carried. Al Clouse motioned to sign the auditors letter. Second by Robin deCathelineau. Carried. Policy Committee - The agreement has been updated in Art. V. Sec. 2 Y2. There are no further changed to the bylaws. There was some discussion on the agreement. Motion by Gary Johnson to accept the agreement with additional change to the last sentence of Art. V. Sec. 2 i 2 to state, "The board shall distribute the systems unallocated reserves in a manner consistent with the source from which the SYSTEM acquired such reserves." Second by Art Abel. Carried. A corrected copy will be mailed to the governing bodies. Marleen Canfield made a motion to approve the By -laws. Second by Bob Fleegel. Carried. Copy of by -laws will be mailed with the agreement. Ivey Vonderharr presented the Personnel Committee report. She noted that as a public agency, PLS falls under the Federal Fair Labor Law and therefore must pay overtime in accordance with that Act so our policy has to be amended. Ivey Vonderharr motioned to approve amendment to the policy. Second by Marleen Canfield. Gary Johnson questioned who's to be included in this. Does not include contract employees. Carried. Ivey Vonderharr motioned to accept the revised pay schedule. Second by Al Clouse. Bob Fleegel questioned whether there were significant changes for employees. Personnel is working on this issue. Carried. Ivey Vonderharr motioned that the board approve the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust renewal amendment for our health insurance. Second by Marleen Canfield. There was discussion on the increase. Carried. The awards dinner will by held at the Graceville Community center on April 25. Brent Olson will be the guest speaker. There was no old business. New Business. Mark Dahl brought up concern over the new fine -� schedules on over due books and materials and the possibility of them discouraging library use especially by younger members. There was discussion over this. Automation committee intends to look at the schedules and may form a new policy. John Boulahan presented the Directors Report. The next meeting will be in Graceville on April 25. The meeting adjourned at 9:03 Stacey Schuette Secretary 0