cp06-12-2000 cA Am
JUNE
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
2000
-11-
-12
-13-
7:00 am. — Leadership Team
LEAGUE OF
HUTCHINSON
Meeting in City Center Main
MINNESOTA CITIES
CITY
JAYCEE WATER
Conference Room
CONFERENCE
CALENDAR
CARNIVAL WEEK
1:30 p.m. — Management Team at City
IN ST. CLOUD
Center Main Conf erence Room
June 13-16
3:30 p.m. —Open Bids for Two Fire
WEEK OF
Trucks in Council Chambers
June 11 -17
4 s
4:00 p.m. — City Council Workshop in
Main Conference Room
1
2
5:30 p.m. — City Council Meeting in
`
Council Chambers
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
-14-
-15-
-16-
-17-
CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/
FLAG DAY
TRAINING/VACATION
6/12 -16 Marilyn J. Swanson (V)
45
6/12 Ken Merrill (Nn
�'
C -Conference
M = Meeting
S = Seminar
T =Training
V = Vacation
W = Workshop
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2000
2. INVOCATION — Pastor Jonathan Rathjen, Peace Lutheran Church
3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of May 23, 2000 and Bid Opening Minutes of June 9, 2000
Action - Motion to approve as presented
i . O
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
1. BUILDING OFFICIAL'S REPORT FOR MAY 2000
2. PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY
BOARD MINUTES OF MAY 4, 2000
3. LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF MAY 22, 2000
4. CIVIL SERVICE POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES OF MAY 12,
2000
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 00-269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31;
MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE
FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 27, 2000)
2. ORDINANCE NO. 00-274 - REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM R -I TO
C-4 LOCATED NORTH OF AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS
REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. (WAIVE SECOND READING AND
ADOPT)
3. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 - REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTH OF EDMONTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S THIRD
ADDITION FROM R -1 TO R -2 AND R -3 AS REQUESTED BY
DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY (WAIVE SECOND READING
AND ADOPT)
4. ORDINANCE NO. 00-276 - REZONING FROM UC TO R -2 (106
MONROE STREET SE) AS REQUESTED BY TODAY'S PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT (WAIVE SECOND READING AND ADOPT)
(c) DANCE PERMITS:
r JOSE PALACIOS ON AUGUST 12 & AUGUST 26, 2000
• > HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION ON JULY 1, 2000 (WAIVE
FEE)
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JUNE 12, 2000 •
(d) SHORT -TERM "ON SALE" NON- INTOXICATING 3.2 BEER LICENSE ON
JUNE 30 — JULY 2, 2000 FOR HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION AT
FAIR GROUNDS (WAIVE FEE)
(e) TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE ON JUNE 30 — JULY 2, 2000 FOR
HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REUNION AT FAIR GROUNDS (WAIVE
FEE)
(f) TOBACCO LICENSE FOR POTTERS PASTIMES
(g) OUT -OF -STATE TRAVEL FOR DIRECTOR RANDY DEVRIES TO ATTEND
ANNUAL WATER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 14-18,2000 IN ANAHEIM, CA
Action — Motion to approve consent agenda
5. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M.
(a) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 00-01; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SANITARY
SEWER - PHASE 1
Action — Motion to close hearing - Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt
Resolutions No. 11491 & No. 11492
(b) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00-02; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER —
PHASE 2 •
Action — Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt
Resolutions No. 11493 & No. 11494
(d) PETITION TO VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS LOCATED
IN OUTLOT A OF ISLAND HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION
Action — Motion to close hearing — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and waive
first reading of Ordinance No. 00-277 and set second reading for June 27, 2000
6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS
(a) PRESENTATION BY JEFFREY J. BLOOM REGARDING INTERNET GAMING
PARTY AT FAIR GROUNDS ON AUGUST 4 & 5, 2000
Action -
7.
(a) CONSIDERATION OF DEFERRING RESCUE VEHICLE BID OPENING UNTIL
SPRING 2001
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve postponement
MINNFU ICI
(a) CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FROM HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER •
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA — JUNE 12, 2000
OF COMMERCE FOR THE 26 ANNUAL ARTS & CRAFTS FESTIVAL TO BE
HELD SEPTEMBER 15 & 16. 2000
• USE OF LIBRARY SQUARE PARK FOR EXHIBITORS
• CLOSING OF DESIGNATED STREETS AND MUNICIPAL PARKING LOTS
• RESERVE ALL CONCESSION RIGHTS IN DOWNTOWN AREA AND
CONTROL OF FOOD EXHIBITORS FOR TASTE OF HUTCHINSON
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(b) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BID FOR LETTING NO. 7, PROJECT NO.
00 -20, SOUTH GRADE ROAD (DALE STREET TO SCHOOL ROAD) MSA
PROJECT
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolution No. 11495
awarding bid
(c) CONSIDERATION OF RENAMING WAL- MART'S FINAL PLAT
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Revised Resolution No.
11453
(d) CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING BROCHURE WITH
PROCEDURE AND PRACTICES
• Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(e) CONSIDERATION OF OBTAINING A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR
PREPARATION OF COMMUNITY CENTER PREDESIGN PROPOSAL
Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve
(a) COMMUNICATIONS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B
Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds
� � 1: ►lu 1 ►r
L
• MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000
1. Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members
present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jim Haugen, , Kay Peterson and Duane
Hoversten. Absent: John Mlinar. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director
of Engineering John Rodeberg and City Attorney Marc A. Sebora.
2. Pastor Jon Lindekugel presented the invocation.
i u 1►l
The minutes of the regular meeting of April 25, 2000 and May 9, 2000 were approved as
presented.
(a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF APRIL 18, 2000
2. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE BOARD MINUTES OF APRIL
18, 2000
• 3. FINANCIAL REORT AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR APRIL 2000
(b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -269 — AMENDING SECTION 10.31;
MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY TO CITY OF HUTCHINSON
WEED ORDINANCE AND LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN (WAIVE
FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 12)
2. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -273 - PARTIAL VACATION OF BOSTON
STREET AND BALTIMORE AVENUE (WAIVE SECOND READING
AND ADOPT)
3. RESOLUTION NO. 11471 —RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING LOCATION
FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
(c) DANCE PERMIT FOR 2000 POLKA FESTIVAL AT MCLEOD COUNTY FAIR
GROUNDS ON JUNE 8-10,2000
(d) SHORT -TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ON
AUGUST 22, 2000
(e) APPOINTMENT OF SUSAN MARTI TO CIVIL SERVICE POLICE
COMMISSION
(f) LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 00-01; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SANITARY
SEWER - PHASE 1:
➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11476 — RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
3,
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - MAY 23, 2000
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11477 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00-02; SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER -
PHASE 2:
➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11478 - RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
➢ RESOLUTION NO. 11479 - RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS:
(g) LOT SPLIT REQUESTED BY HOERNEMANN TRUST (SECTION 7 OF
HASSAN VALLEY TOWNSHIP) WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11482)
(h) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE REQUESTED BY
MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11483)
(i) REZONING OF PROPERTY FROM R -1 TO C4 LOCATED NORTH OF
AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS REQUESTED BY MENARD INC.
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO.
00 -274 AND SET SECOND READING FOR JUNE 12, 2000)
(j) PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 4 -LOT SUBDMSION LOCATED NORTH OF
AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF TH 15 AS. REQUESTED BY MENARD INC.
WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11484)
(k) REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF EDMONTON AVENUE
AND SOUTH OF BROLL'S THIRD ADDITION FROM R -1 TO R -2 AND R -3 AS
REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE COMPANY WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE.FI ST
READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -275 AND SET SECOND READING FOR
JUNE 12, 2000)
(1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT UTILITY TRANSMISSION
LINE IN FLOODWAY (SECTION 8 OF HASSAN VALLEY) AS REQUESTED
BY HUTCHINSON UTILITIES COMMISSION WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDTAION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 11485)
(m) REZONING FROM PC TO R -2 (106 MONROE STREET SE) AS REQUESTED
BY TODAY'S PROPERTY MANAGEMENT WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (WAIVE FIRST
READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 00 -276 AND SET SECOND READING FOR
NNE 12, 2000) 1''
(n) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A FENCE HIGHER THAN 30'
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000
IN FRONT YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 795 COLORADO STREET AS
REQUESTED BY JOHN EWERT WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11486)
(o) 6" VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT OFFICE SPACE ADDITION AT 340
MICHIGAN STREET SE WHICH DOES NOT MEET REQUIRED SETBACK OF
30 FEET AS REQUESTED BY ALLIED MECHANICAL WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 11487)
(p) VARIANCE TO REDUCE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 30
FEET TO 5 FEET FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 945 FIFTH
AVENUE SE AS REQUESTED BY RICHARD MCCLURE WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 11488)
(q) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR GRADING WITHIN FLOODWAY OF
SOUTH FORK OF CROW RIVER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 10' BITUMINOUS
TRAIL AS REQUESTED BY CITY OF HUTCHINSON WITH FAVORABLE
RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 11489)
(r) LOT SPLIT LOCATED AT 760 CENTURY AVENUE SW AS REQUESTED BY
CURTIS AND JANEL REITER WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION
• WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11490)
Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve the consent agenda except for
item 4-(b)-I, Ordinance No. 00 -269, which was pulled from the agenda and items
(h), (i) and 0) pertaining to Menard Inc. which were pulled for discussion. Motion
unanim ously carried.
Items 4-(h), (i) & 6) — Rodeberg stated there were no particular issues with these
items, but he wanted to address the property in the Hoernemann Estate. The City
Engineer then showed the City Council a drawing of the proposed store to be built
in Hutchinson. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended a pre -cast
facility, which was an issue of aesthetics.
Jim Sheppard, a representative of Menard Inc., requested that the City Council look
favorably on the plan and approve the building as proposed in the drawing since it
is a standard design for Menards.
Haugen informed the Council that the Planning Commission voted unanim ously for
pre -cast panels as presented.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve: (h) — conditional use permit and
adopt Resolution No. 11483; (i) — rezoning of property and waive first reading of
. Ordinance No. 00 -274 and set second reading for June 12, 200; and 0) — preliminary
plat and adopt Resolution No. 11484. Motion unanim ously carried.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000
5. PUBLIC RIN — 6:00 P.M.
(a) ASSESSMENT HEARING ON ROLL NO. 5039, LETTING NO. 6; PROJECTS
NO. 99 -20, 00 -09, 00 -12 THROUGH 00 -14, 00-16 THROUGH 00 -19
The Mayor called the hearing to order at 6:00 p.m.
Rodeberg explained the purpose of the assessment hearing and the payment options
available. He stated that the assessment was based on actual project costs, and the
interest rate would be both the costs plus an additional one percent, which would
amount to approximately 6.5% or 7.5 %.
Project No. 00-09 — Griffin Avenue NE
The City Engineer reported that the actual street costs came in at $73.18 a front foot
which was significantly over the estimates. He stated the cost variance from the
estimate was due to the level of storm sewer reconstruction, cost of tile lines and
especially the higher cost of bituminous. Therefore, the proposed rate was 10% over
the estimated range given at the public hearing. The City would be paying two-thirds
of the project cost.
The property owner at 205 Griffin Avenue NE stated he favored the project.
However, he had a concern about the cost to the homeowner and felt it was a high
price for a city street. Although he didn't have an answer to the situation, he wanted
to express his opinion as a homeowner and taxpayer. •
Roger DeMeyer, 307 Griffin Avenue NE, also expressed concern about the cost to
the property owner. He inquired about the assessment policy for a comer lot.
Rodeberg was concerned that the City would be setting a precedent on this project
with the substantial increase in cost.
The Mayor suggested that the project not be awarded and be rebid in 2001.
Project No. 00-12 — Hilltop Drive NE
The City Engineer stated that this project would cover bituminous wear course and
sewer and water service. Like the previous project, the costs were higher than
expected because of the higher petroleum/bituminous prices. He noted that the
assessments would be on a per lot basis as stated in the Subdivision Agreement.
No one was present to be heard
Project No. 00-13 — Hunter's Ridge (Wear Course Paving)
Rodeberg commented that this project came in at a reasonable cost. The estimated
cost per lot was $1,100 to $1,300, and the final assessment rate will be based on the
bid price received.
No one was present to be heard.
Project No. 00-17 — Michael Court (Boyle's Addition)
• CITY COUNCII. MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000
The City Engineer reviewed the layout of the project. He noted that Chet Hoversten
owns five or six lots. Although the City saved money by runnin a street through the
area, it will have no value until the area is developed. Only the sanitary sewer,
watermain, street and storm sewer is included in the assessment. He suggested that
perhaps only the sanitary sewer should he completed in 2000 due to the need beyond
the immediate plat.
Attorney Jody Winters represented Chet Hoversten, a.k.a. Chet and Associates. She
stated that her client was in favor of the entire project and not just street and sanitary
sewer. Winters also claimed the assessments were not equal to the value of the five -
lot parcel at an assessment of $30,000 per parcel if the City cannot prove the value
and benefits. She also admonished the City for mailing Mr. Hoversten's notice to a
post office box in Glencoe when he resides in Wisconsin. In closing, Winters
inquired about the City's intent north of the cul -de -sac.
Rodeberg responded that there would he development to the north with a sewer into
the KDUZ property. Otherwise, there would be no other proposed development in
that area.
The City Attorney stated that it was the City's obligation to send a notice to the
address maintained by the County. He further remarked that the assessments were
valid. The objection of the party is to file a notice within 30 days.
The City Engineer closed his presentation by stating only sanitary sewer would be
• done in 2000.
Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to close the hearing at 6:27 p.m. Motion
unanim ously carried.
Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to rebid project No. 00 -09. Motion
unanim ously carried.
Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to approve project No. 00-12. Motion
unanim ously carried.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve project No. 00 -13. Motion
unanim ously earned.
Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson, to proceed with accepting sanitary sewer
only for project No. 00-17. Motion unanimously carried.
Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve and adopt Resolutions No. 11480
and No. 11481. Motion unanim ously tamed.
MEE MMT V MUM 5 X111i *5 vVICI 13 W WN 00► •
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SETTING NEW BID OPENING DATE OF JULY 17, 2000
AT 5:30 P.M. FOR CTTY/RLRAL SHARED RESCUE VEHICLE
• Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to approve the new bid opening date.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000
Motion unanimously carried.
8. NEW BUSINESS
(a) CONSIDERATION OF SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the sale of city surplus property.
Motion unanimously carved.
(b) CONSIDERATION OF CITY'S VISION STATEMENT AND CITY COUNCIL
VISION STATEMENTS
Plotz reported that the City Council reviewed the proposed City's vision statement
and City Council vision statement during a recent workshop. Some minor changes
were made at that time. In the future, the vision statements will be reviewed on an
annual basis.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve and adopt the two vision
statements. Motion unanim ously carried.
u I : ►1
(a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR
The Mayor read a letter received from Jeffrey Higginbotham, Assistant Director of
the U.S. Department of Justice that was addressed to the Chief of Police. In his
letter, Director Higginbotham expressed thanks for the use of the public safety
training facility for the North Central Law Enforcement Executive Development
Seminar.
(b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER KAY PETERSON
Peterson stated there was one opening on the local Library Board and two positions
on the Pioneerland Library System Board. Interested parties should contact the
public library or City staff.
(c) COMMUNICATIONS TO SET WORKSHOP DATES
> It was clarified that the workshop on June 12, 2000 at 4:00 p.m. was for the
purpose of reviewing the community survey final report with the Community
Needs Task Force.
> It was noted that the HRA had requested a joint meeting of the City Council with
the HRA Board on June 20, 2000 at noon.
Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to hold a workshop with the HRA
Board on June 20, 2000 at 12:00 noon. Motion unanimously carried.
P
• CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — MAY 23, 2000
➢ It was recommended to hold a budget workshop on August 22, 2000 at 4:00 p.m.
and continue it after the regular City Council meeting.
Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to approve the budget workshop on
August 22, 2000. Motion unanim ously carried.
10. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B
Motion by Haugen, second by Peterson to approve the verified claims A and
authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried.
Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the verified claims B and
authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion carved with Hoversten
abstaining from voting.
� � l: ►lul ►Y
• There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:32 p.m.
•
7
• MINUTES
BID OPENING
FRIDAY, JUNE 9, 2000
Finance Director Kenneth B. Merrill called the bid opening to order at 10:00 am. Also
present were Quentin Larson, SRF Consultant Dave Roedel, and Administrative
Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson.
Merrill dispensed with the reading of Publication No. 6174, Advertisement for Bids,
Letting No. 7, Project No. 00 -20.
The following bids were opened and read:
D & C Dozing
Montevideo, MN $825,806.82
Duininck Bros., Inc.
Prinsburg, MN 745,040.32
Juul Contracting Company
• Hutchinson, MN 874,931.20
Quam Construction Company Inc.
Willmar, MN 777,921.25
Wm. Mueller & Sons Inc.
Hamburg, MN 787,932.69
The bids were referred to staff for review and a recommendation. It was reported that
Letting No. 7 would be awarded at the June 12, 2000 City Council meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 10:10 am.
•
M
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
BUILDING / PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT
I I I HASSAN STREET S.E HUTCHINSON NN5535t 40NE:612- 234 -42-16 FAX:612.234 -0240
May 2000
NEW RESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBUCLY OWNED
HOUSEKEEPING
Itarn
`Axber of
valuabm of
Numeer of 1 1aluabon of
BUILDINGS
No.
carsWCtbn
Buildings HOU.SM . Strucbw
Bwtdirgs
Housing
Units
Onut cane
Unite mlf cenrs
I
(a)
of
(c)
(d)
(e) (1) 9)
Single -amdy twuses, detached
Erdipa n,00wa nar,a
101
12
12
1,144,000
Slrgle -fanny houses. altsched
= MaYTa�b b /OOl aa1.
- wuwsowao(we. a,e
SaQMYIrM aY✓°emadutaw n,ab,a
102
Tvro-amay buildnas
103
Three- and ford -farniiy buildinge
104
Frveor -more farts' buildings
105
TOTAL: Sun a 101 -105
100
12 12
, 144, 000
NEW RESIDENTIAL
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
NONHOUSEKEEPING
Ism
Nsabad
I valuation of
Number of
valuation or
BUILDINGS
No.
caneuction
corstrudtlon
&sltirgs
Roprns
8uibkge
Rooms
and Cana
Omd cents
(d)
(b)
fa
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Hot". motew ano tourat cabins
(trarwent a0wr modauons crew)
213
Other ranho sekeepirg shelter
214
NEW
PRIVATELY OWNED
PUBLICLY OWNED
NONRESIDENTIAL
lam
Number Vakaoon of
Numuer of Valuation Of
BUILDINGS
No.
of mmaactnn
B Mwv wrsmctpn
BnAdga true canes
orriecana
(A)
(b) (c)
(d) (al
Amusement, sodel- and recreational
316
Churches and other reagioua
316
Indstnal
320
2
3,736,000
Parking gsmgm (6W0rgs s open decked)
321
Service stations amt repel garages
322
Hospitals and kuae411tiorlN
323
OOkse, balls. and professional
324
Public aorls end utilities
in
2
1,459.000
Schools and other educational
326
Stores and cuslnner services
327
Omer nonresidential budOns
326
Structures other man buildings
326
1
7,500
ADDITIONS,
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBUCLY OWNED
ALTERATIONS,
Item
Number
VaMtipn of
Number of Vakatian of
AND CONVERSIONS
No,
of
construction
Buildings oarsvuctbn
Buddir s
OraPCena
Omd cenrs
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d) fe)
Residential - pegdt'addOwsof
434
gangw and cuowa n flow 438
4
13.000
NOW9114antlal and ncnhoueekeeping
437
1
1
112,500
1
3,000
Additions, of res lerobal garages and
436
tarpons (attached and detached)
DEMOLITIONS
PRIVATELY
OWNED
PUBLICLY
OWNED
AND RAZING
Item
Number
Number of
Number of
Number of
OF BUILDINGS
No.
of
Housing unite
Budd"
Housing units
Build gs
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
,el
SWOwlamly trouser (attessd orb
645
detaasd)
1
1
Two-family bui di ge
a"
Three and faa -amity burklkge
647
Fve-or -more family bu*kgs
me
Aa 10r buildings and atnlcrurae
649
non -ry, ono -o, awn -o, nn� -e, renux. -lv. unav ewnx -w. nnx�. n - - - -
SHED -1, SPRINKLER -3 Total Petmits 103 Total Valuation $6,519.877 Total :nsp. 259
44) -2
WfDFVIOUAL PElIIWTS AUTM FM3M LVNSTMIA:inAa YALYCU A
Plaaaa Ra.+da dr �9 rMOmurlon for sam oarrrm auror0q � vaard a1 f3D0.000 a more _
araared ti a tt.a aeoya aeNma
Ibm No
Irani
WIN*
Saco"
(a)
Oaaubrbr.
Na and addraaa of
awnar or addax
(c)
O.wrrsh4
Mark (X)
arr
(d)
yakwoon a
corrsuctan
Oral Cars
(a)
Nuroar
of
Houaaxl
unb
(0
uildrgs
(9)
320
p ry y y�dy,(b)
Induacr131
3M Com any
m Prt r
❑ Punk
3 3,500,000
905 AdalKs Sc SE
90
Hutchinson `.01
325
Kind Of bL"
City of Hutchinson
❑ PrNm
m Pneae
i 1,432,000
She addiwis
1300 Adams St SE
111 Hassan St SE
Hutchinson, MN
Ka.d of Wedng
❑ Pm.0
❑ Pubac
t
Skmaddimis
Ka.d of buddy
❑ PrNala
❑ P.DkC
1 f
Cmsnwaa
M you agars d any nm panlal -wq ❑ No O Yw • Rwe gw addNnrl ldwmmdm kr Cor r
Naar d param to aa.fad "EC6 q dw raporl
TaMpfror.a
rlraa rnW
NunnMr
Enrulon
Tr"
II I I II
NO POSTAGE
N F E MAILED
IN THE
UNITED STATES
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
r+vraur a�a rwrr.o. ®.o .aara�ww�oar�m
P AQE y 9a PAD BY ADMESS
F. W. Dodge
Huildlnn .11nuvna
I'U Hos Flri
LmnRlm .MA 02420 -9536
Ill ..... ... 1.1...11..11 „11,,,1,1.,11...1
MINUTES
Parks, Recreation & Community Education Advisory Board
• May 4, 2000
Members present: Jay Beytien, Mark Cormier, Bernie Miner, John Mlinar, Dolf Moon, Sonja Muellerleile,
Rich Pettet, Brett Rasmussen, Mike Schiesl, Theresa Sweeney.
Minutes dated April 6, 2000 were approved by Bernie Miner and seconded by Theresa Sweeney.
OLD BUSINESS
Teen Survey: No report.
School Aged Childcare: School Board passed 4 -8 grade program. Limited registration so far. Need to
have 14 enrolled year round for program to go. Will be ok for the summer. Splitting kids up seems to be
the biggest problem (i.e. 2°" & 4' grade).
Arena Wrap -up: Applying for MRPA Facility Award. Is a feel good opportunity for Skating & Hockey
Associations. Will meet with HYHA before June to discus finishing projects (landscaping, painting, water
seal, extend roofline).
NEW BUSINESS
Summer Registration: 525,000 in registrations, 55,000 down from last year. Lines were gone in Ya hour.
Longest line was Summer Discovery. Offering swimming lessons year round seems to help. People seem
to be registering closer to the event. Classes stay small in fall/winter /spring due to lack of staff, bigger in
summer. May not need 4 session of swimming in summer in future. Not concerned with budget at this
point with dollars being lower. Recreation baseball is concem. Down 3 50 from last year. HJLB has a good
evening program and have expanded age groups but affordability may be a problem.
Softball Fees: Hutchinson Leader article about sanctioned softball leagues. Comes out to about
S9 /team/game or 75¢/person/game. Sponsors sometimes pay for '' /z-all of fee. Sanctioned numbers are
down. A lot of teams are coaching their kids instead of playing ball. Co- Recreation numbers are up.
Fee breakdown includes: $198 (city gets for field maintenance)
$198 (umpire fees)
$ 52 (1 dozen softballs)
S 3 5 (goes to org. for state fees)
S 15 (optional trophies)
Total 5498
Summer Projects: Oddfellows bathroom done July 4; BMX track; Arena; Connecticut Park playground.
Will offer Menards the opportunity to donate playground equipment ($16,000- 20,000). They will still pay
parkland fees ($ 16,000) regardless. Meeting next week.; Basketball court at Jr Community Women's Park;
Dugout at Northwoods and Riverside Parks. HJLB is paying.; Landscape at schools with forestry grant;
Veteran's Park — moving along. Want county wide initiative, Glencoe not on board but all others in county
approve. Lots of representation at meetings. Want war memorabilia in park (i.e. tank).; Miscellaneous:
• Target donated $20,000 for trail plus a $12,000 check. They will maintain trail.
Summer Meeting Schedule: Normal meeting time for June. No July meeting, tour instead. Will notify
board members. August meeting may be one (1) week later. Will notify board members.
Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting
• Monday My 22, 2000
Members Present: Connie Lambert,Mary Henke, Larry Ladd, Newton Potter
Kay Peterson, Kay Johnson, Lois Carlson
Members Absent: Richard Peterson
Before the board meeting was called to order, president Connie Lambert
awarded the Pioneerland Library System Hall of Fame Award to Delores
Brunner and Barbara Whittenberg who were unable to attend the award
dinner in Graceville.
President Connie Lambert called the meeting to order. The minutes were
approved as mailed.
old Business: A lengthy discussion was held about the openings on the
local and PLS boards. The board feels it is difficult to get people to
join the PLS board because of such frequent meetings and the long
distance required to travel to the meetings. It was suggested that the
full Pioneerland Board could meet bimonthly or quarterly to help
encourage participation. Kay Peterson will mention the situation to the
council meeting and Kay Johnson will include an article in the
Hutchinson Leader with the possibility that interested persons may
respond.
We purchased two planters from Jerry Brown and he will change the
• plantings three times during the summer. Trees will be planted next
month.
Mary Henke reported on the budget. A 4% increase was submitted.
Carpeting in the library needs replacing. Kay Peterson suggested we make
the request soon as budget planning will be discussed at the next
meeting.
Mary Henke and Kay Johnson attended the County Commissioners meeting in
Winsted. Pay equity problems were discussed and the 4% budget increase
will likely be accepted.
A thank you card was signed by the board for Paul Wright for his past
work on the library board.
A discussion was held about the Minneapolis library problems with
pornography on the internet. Mary said we have a policy here that must
be adhered to, and we have had no problem so far.
Kay Johnson gave a report on the May 18 PLS board meeting. Items
discussed were the 2001 budget; job description; pay equity issues;
by -laws; and problems with fines.
The next meeting will be Monday June 26,2000 at 4:30 PM
• There were no donations in April.
The meeting was adjourned. Lois Carlson, Secretary
J/ 4) - '�
0 HUTCHINSON POLICE COMMISSION MINUTES
0
The Hutchinson Police Commission held a meeting on May 12, 2000, at the Hutchinson
Police Department. Present at the meeting were Cheryl Dooley, Bob Bowen, Lt. Dave
Erlandson and Chief Steve Madson. The meeting was called to order.
Chief Madson stated that the commission needed to certify the eligibility roster for the
communication specialist position. He stated that oral interviews were conducted with all
applicants for the position. A written examination was also administered to the applicants
that suocessfully completed the first phase. Madson stated that Krystal Pass had been
appointed an emergency full -time position and Robin Shoen an emergency part-time
position. Both individuals are contained on the roster. A motion was made by Bob Bowen,
seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to accept the eligibility roster as presented to the commission.
Motion carried.
Chief Madson then stated to the commission that the number of applicants was low for this
position. He stated that he felt this was due to the saturated job market, the schedule of
7 / 24 and the pay rate.
With there being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Bob Bowen,
seconded by Cheryl Dooley, to adjourn. Motion carved.
Time of adjournment was 7:45 a.m.
Bo Bowen
PUBLICATION NO.
0
ORDINANCE N0. 00 -274
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -1 to C-i (proposed as Menard's Inc.) with
the following legal description:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7,
Township 116, Range 29, now being known as Lot 21 of
Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, McLeod
County, Minnesota;
The South 10 acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, being the South 10
acres of Lot 20 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116,
Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota;
And
That part of Lot 20 of the Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township
116. Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 20 and 340
feet North of the Southeast comer of said Lot 20; thence West,
parallel with the South line of said Lot 20, 1195.5 feet to the
Center of Minnesota Trunk Highway 15; thence Northerly along
said centerline 291.7 feet; thence East, parallel with said South
line, to said East line; thence South, along said East line 291.7
feet, to the point of beginning.
LESS AND EXCEPT that part of the West half of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Range 29, also known as
Lots 20 and 21 of Auditor's Plat of Section 7, Township 116,
Range 29, McLeod County, Minnesota shown as Parcel 250 on
Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat
numbered 43 -19, as the same is on file and of record in the office
of the County Recorder in and for McLeod County, Minnesota
LESS AND EXCEPT
Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28, files of the
Registrar of Titles, County of McLeod Minn., EXCEPTING
THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT TO-
WIT:
That part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28,
McLeod County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at
Resolution NO. _
Menards Rezoning
May 23, 2000
Page 2
the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assumed bearing,
along the north line of said Tract C to the northwest comer of
Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence
South, along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the
southwest comer of said Tract A. thence East, along the south line
of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of
said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 28; thence South, along
the west line of said Tract B and southerly prolongation 200.00
feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the
west line of said Tract C; thence North ) degrees 15 minutes 55
seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning.
Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
0
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
The following described real property is hereby rezoned from R -I to R2 and R3 as provided in Exhibit A and
with the following legal descriptions
LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R2 Area:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION for R3 Area:
See Exhibit B
See Exhibit C
Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
0
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO 00-275
Estebrook Area
May 23, 2000
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
oul
DEVELOPERS RESOIRCE
ORDINANCE NO 00-775
Estebrook area
0
May 23, 2000
Page 2
1 *3,'11:1 11�
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
That pat of Tract C, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28, files of the Registrar of
Titles, McLeod Coaoty, Mimmta, that ties east of the soruherly a¢endon of the east tine of
Sherwood Street, acoordmg to the record pier of SCHIVIIDT BAUER'S FOURTH ADDITION;
and north of tbn westerly erne mn of the north tine of the AUDITOR'S PLAT OF LOT 15 OF
THE AUDITOR'S PLAT OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 116 NORM RANGE 29 WEST,
according to the record plot thereof
0
•
ORDINANCE NO oo-27
Estebrook Area
Mav 23, 2000
Page 3
EXHIBIT B
R -2 ZONING -
That part of Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBEP A. files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod
County, Minnesota, that lies east of the southerly extension of the east line of Tract A of said REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28 and southerly and westerly of the following described line:
Beginning at the northeast comer of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28; thence
on an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West, along the east line, and its
southerly extension. of said Tract A, a distance of 264.37 feet; thence North 61 degrees 38 minutes 21
seconds East, a distance of 6.14 feet; thence 121.37 feet northeasterly along a tangential curve concave
northwesterly having a radius of 1290.55 feet and a central angle of 05 degrees 23 minutes 18 seconds;
thence 239.30 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of 405.00 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 51
minutes 17 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 53 minutes 41 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of
337.50 feet; thence 240.80 feet southwesterly on a tangential curve concave southeasterly having a radius of
150.00 feet and a central angle of 91 degrees 58 minutes 38 seconds; thence South 02 degrees 25 minutes 00
seconds West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 560.27 feet to the south line of said Tract A.
,�pt17 t 0
R -3 ZONING:
That part of Tract C REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28, files of the Registrar of Titles, McLeod
County, Minnesota, that lies west of the southerly extension of the east line of Tract A of said REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY NUMBER 28.
EXCEPT that part of Tract C of REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28, McLeod County, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest comer of said Tract C; thence East assum bearing, along the north line of said
Tract C to the northwest corner of Tract A of said REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 28; thence South,
along the west line of said Tract A 50.00 feet to the southwest comer of said Tract A; thence East, along the
south line of said Tract A 60.00 feet to the northwest comer of Tract B of said REGISTERED LAND
SURVEY NO. 28; thence South, along the west line of said Tract B and its southerly prolongation 200.00
feet; thence West parallel with the north line of said Tract C to the west line of said Tract C; thence North 00
degrees 15 minutes 55 seconds West, along said west line to the point of beginning.
0
PUBLICATION NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 00 -276
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING REGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON AND
THE OFFICIAL ZONING IM"
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
The following described real property is hereby rezoned from UC to R2 (Today's Property Management):
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
•
Lot 1, Block 16, in the south half of Hutchinson Townsite, McLeod
County, Minnesota
Adopted by the City Council this 23' day of May, 2000.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
/ol z-,
J / �
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
DBEs S0Wftd "*;b6 � r 9*b ptW ip der :. 1.
0
f�lnv ; U
HaettblFfl Sr »Mesh No
Y'R NO
No
Signature of Applicant
0
aID
MAY 2 3 mo 09/99
1:1FORMSIDANCEPERMIT
ftol
2 - Z
APPUCATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
Dade Subrv~ Wiat b64W604 PrW b�
•1 1 • � 1.1 r
s
AWa4e D"
Actimof /�'1Y{IE/�Ii1�
AID
1AFORMWANCEPERMJT MAY 2 3 2000 09199
QWGJkW
4 n ,
3 77
- Y.
omp*m.om NOW
*.
�.
r C. u
T
�`.
AM
�
,_
•1 1 • � 1.1 r
s
AWa4e D"
Actimof /�'1Y{IE/�Ii1�
AID
1AFORMWANCEPERMJT MAY 2 3 2000 09199
QWGJkW
4 n ,
APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT
FEE $50.00
DwW 8ubmftd Must bot 4_ Wooft pdW to done*dd*) 1 6 _ 1 - 0v
0
Narrr owppl[20 : jhForn A - 5 (R z Z) to K lC H-
Addtsas - CrT rZr N � a nd SS - 7 -�L 33
- �U l6ER :Loco �. C� QEUn)lo/J
$ _ .0.30 e /KSc� "' S '7 -1133
,� LA t- 00-0 :�, � .: AladA
Dawoy
hT
tlaathebcdOnz�� :w o No
Rave �txtrt•itit1!a Yes
Et68wt�ere ?' Yes o
Signature of Applicant
0
1AFORMWANCEPERMff
4 -2,
Fore No. � .w1. .
raa
REMEL "ON SALE"
0
0
Matt at AInne
COUA'TI' Or. _. McLeod tier rr Hucchinsoa
To the ........... .... city __Cauneil ................. ..of the ......... tics . ..... ............... d_Hk55h RR99........_ .......
............ ....................... I .................................................. _._ ... State d �:
HUTCH TIGER 2000 ALL CLASS REMON
hereby apps ;es -Js s ilawm far W Mew of— .. _th days
fre,ws M o f un 200010 ss7y
At RdsH Only, Non4atokattas Mak LWIS ar
as she same are, dsAnd by low, far awwwopilew "ON" thew eniaiw promises b Me
dewribsd d fouew.
Event to be held at McLeod County Fair Grounds
at which piw+s aid aYf...
as d is Mat wed r4raema amd •afa= feuaew:
Shat said appuesw — r. ,1u,a. ._ef As Una" of post s+erat ehasasler
wed repute; and he._ --zft the ape of 21 roan; that_------ poprtdar_o/ the
s+tabliehinow for which the Ue n will be iemd if this amw -&iian w praabd.
That w manrfaotw of suet ww�ntosirtlnp Matt Uquon has ear assnaehta to ndele or in Pori.
in said bwdwew of said appitmat_ or awe iwtwwt Uwe,*;
That rid apptioaat— .nsaka. -Mle apOtosttms pu+mant sad swbl" k a8 the low of the Btate of
X wwwwo - and she wdi awes, and re,pwiatiw of sold r. +t.JL
applicable Movie, which are hereby wads a part hwwf. and hwe,by apres_ -Se obmrw and oky W some;
mr. v mane a o.
Recommend approval.
Driver's license I.D. required for purchase,.
Steve nadson. Police Chief
Fach applicant farther states that —hew not now the holder of, nor has _he mats application for,
nor does —he intend to make application for a Federal Retail Deakr's special tax stamp for the safe of
intoxicalma ligAw. ,
The American Legion has been contracted to serve 3.2 beer
and intoxicating liquor at this event.
0
n.a.c_� / �'Cl
P. rr 0. ,,// C.'.go y� SI
11
9
J
. Minnt M Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Worcerneat Division
1 444 Cedar St -Suits 133
St Pahl, MN 55101 -5133
(651496.6439 TDD (651)282 -6555
APPUCATION AND PRRMPf
FOR A TEWORARY ON -SALT LIQUOR 1.1(YNSE
TYPE (M IMINT INIk"a
N OF f1RC NiZATION
c[ �' i s v� v;
Al OAM,
i
TAX F�CF7111'T NUMBFJt
$
TT Ai�NHtFSS S
Y
STATF / t' K
7JP cx)DB
i ��I / ��c
L etc:
NAME N MA1aN0
Bl13IIVl33 PFIOdB: 110ME P110NB
2 3'
c ? y
( )
DATER WILL L HK SOLD
OF ORGAN17.ATK)N
UCNARl7ABLU ORLDUGMS EER NONMO
p
CLUB
OR TIO O L FFN RR !s r ` -
_ (? ,.;�i` — , .c •_ /W1N e
O I7�T1pN NAME
/
C S ti 5 f iM1YC a.
O'T ON S NAMF.
t c 'r(2 .� acs'
J. C ,2,( L. I• M N S3 c
Location wham license Will be used. If an outdoor area. dnaibe
L2. `cr 1-7 I A.j ct H-
k
Will tlti; appKeanl eaouaet fGR ialwieaRie� BpKr iyrvicw' If a4 $iw the name sad M"M of uho ligror neaaree prow as tha trvioa
L t
u?lip ••. Lt= - r .f 3
License Code MCLONSS ID #966 -
Will Iho aMlicaut carry liquor liability innrm =? If ^ die eanior't moos aatoem of covarap
(N(TM. Inuffance is not mandatory.) C r3 G! 000
APPROVAL
AMJCATWK =Rt ARtOYm W CM43K CORRNDIMO gUOW10670AIAMOIW AUAaU1JNOWOIK�M
Cl'!"YICOUNry City of Hutchinson DATRAPPROVED
CITY M AMOUNT $50-00 1.1(7NM DATFS
DATE PAID
SKfel TA UM' aMtIt tl lC Afl'RO�Y ®AlCeblAnrraarR rtldaarss OYsrr
tMtt: M rat r'wrr e... e.. �arw. raa Mti pry N ea aaanw aaaw ar a4 rryrt lord b ei ei.rtte
.ia k rewar/ r M ae.r.laartt t. s. dt! w qtr r V ]s suss Mprr W wry.
. rt4ala» (Nli4
,j/ , E-7.
—fit—ate of Ainne"a. jr y
M cLeod
County of ....... .............................. . .................... dppU*atiom No ..... ... . .. ....
A C C 0
Application for License to Sell Zi� at Retail
The undersigned resident. of the. .__......._...... city_.._._....
in the county of............ . ........ . ..... Stage o f Minnesota, HBRZBr ir.4xz ...... dppzjci-
TIOXFOR LICENSE to be ism"d . .........
to sell cigarettes a" oijarette papers and wrappers at reftil dt.z ......
- — ------- ----- ----- --------------- . ...... .... - ------- — - --------- ------
.... .......
in tu ... ......... ULY ..... nann _._1a said couixty and state for the term of
..... .. 6--m-n-ths . . . ........... . ............. . ... beffinmixf w " A&_._L7 ........ - ..daV of ....... ........ . __'
subj t a l aws o f the Stat of Mimnsmotm and the ordinanm and rejukWom of so"
.. ....... . ...... ..... thereto, and herewith deposit
s .7-6 ......................... . . . ....... iA P a y .191141m of the fee therefor.
Da"..
DAM
.j u ri 720
L
k .q ..... R.ve ........ .
0
4';y)
I
To: Honorable Mayor & City Council
From: Randy DeVries, Utilities Director
Date: 06/07/00
Re: Water Environmental Federation Annual Conference on Water Quality &
Wastewater Treatment
Per City Council Policy I am requesting attendance at the Water
Environment Federation Annual Conference October 1418,2000 in Anaheim
California. There will be 79 technical sessions, and over 800 exhibits at the
conference. It has been two years since I attended this conference. It was
budgeted for 2000, and I recommend approval.
City Center
111 Hassan Street SE
Parks & Recreation
900 Harrington Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350-3097
(320) 587 -2975
Far (320) 234 -4240
Police Services
10 Franklin Street SW
Hutchinson, MN 55350.2464
(320) 587.2242
Far (320) 5874427 — G.
Hutchinson, .YIN 55350 -2522
(320) 587 -5151
Far (320) 234 -0240
Printed on recycled payer -
PUBLICATION NO. 6177
i
NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
LETTING NO. 11PROJECT NO. 00 -01
LETTING NO. 21PROJECT NO. 00-02
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will meet in the Council
Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN, at 6:00 PM on
the 12th day of June, 2000, to consider the making of an improvement of:
Project No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson
Project No. 00-02
St SE
South Area Trunk
West of TH 15
Sanitary Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson St SE to
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111. The area proposed to be assessed
for such improvement is the benefited property, for which property owners shall receive mailed
notice.
The estimated City Cost of said improvement is $ 3.693.000.00 , with an Assessable Cost of
$ 360.000.00 , for the total estimated cost of $ 4.053.000.00 .
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard
at this meeting.
Dated: May 23rd, 2000
PLEASE NOTE: IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND THIS HEARING, WHETHER YOU ARE
FOR OR AGAINST THE PROJECT, IN ORDER THAT YOUR COUNCIL CAN BE BETTER
INFORMED OF A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OPINION.
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 1ST, 2000 AND
THURSDAY, JUNE 8TH, 2000.
111 Hassan St SE, Hutchinson MN 55350- 2522/Phons (32U) Zj"2UWl - ax
ENGINEERING REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/Public Works
DATE: May 23, 2000
SUBJECT: Letting No. I/Project No. 00 -01 & Letting No. ?!Project No. 00 -02
I have studied the following areas and find that the proposed projects are feasible and recommend
they be constructed.
Letting No. 1 /Proj. No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 1 - WWTF to Jefferson St SE
Letting No. 2/Proj. No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 2 - Jefferson St SE to West of
TH 15
ESTIMATED COST
LettingNo.1
Proj. 00-01
Lofting No 2
Pry W-02
Tom
Construction Cost
$1,975,000.00
$1,225,000.00
$3,200,000.00
Engineering
$276,500.00
$171,500.00
$448,000.00
Administration
$98,750.00
$61,250.00
$160,000.00
FiscaULegal/lnterest
$59,250.00j
$36,750.001
$96,000.00
Other ( Properly Acquisition}
$18,000.00
$131,000.001
$149,000.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$2,427,500.00
$1,625,500.00
$4,053,000.00
ESTIMATED FUNDING
Letting No.1 /Proj. 00-01
Letting No. 21Proj.00-02
Assessable Cost
$60,000.00
Deferred Assessable Cost
$300,000.00
City Bonded
$1,800,000.00
City - Water /Sewer Funds
$1,893,000.00
City — TIF
$0.00
MSA
$0.00
Mn/DOT
$0.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL
$4,053,000.00
cc: Cal Rlce - Engmeenng Department
file: 0/00.01 & 17!00-02
RESOLUTION NO. 11491
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 00 -01
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of May, 2000, fixed a
date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of:
Project No. 00 -01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer - Phase 1 - WWTF to Jefferson St SE
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 23rd
day of IMay, 2000.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall
prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
9
Mayor
City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 11492 9
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NOS. 1
PROJECT NO. 00-01
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of:
Project No. 00-01 South Area Trunk Sanitary Sewer — Phase 1 — WWTF to Jefferson St SE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Administrator until
10:00 am on Friday, July 7th, 2000, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council
Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering,
will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, July 11th,
2000 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder
whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to
address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond
or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
Mayor
City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 11493
• RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
LETTING NO. 2
PROJECT NO. 00 -02
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of May, 2000, fixed a
date for a Council Hearing on the improvement of:
Project No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson Street SE to West of TH 15
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the resolution adopted the 23rd
day of IMay, 2000.
2. John P. Rodeberg is hereby designated as the Engineer for this improvement. He shall
prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement.
Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
11
Mayor
City Administrator
0
RESOLUTION NO. 11494 0
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NOS. 2
PROJECT NO. 00-02
WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has prepared plans and specifications for the
improvement of.
Project No. 00-02 South Area Trunk Sewer — Phase 2 — Jefferson Street SE to West of TH 15
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The Director of Engineering shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
newspaper, an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such
approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for three weeks, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Administrator until
10:00 am on Friday, July 7th, 2000, at which time they will be publicly opened in the Council 1 0 Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center by the City Administrator and/or Director of Engineering,
will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the Council at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, July 11th,
2000 in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Any bidder
whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to
address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
filed with the Director of Engineering and accompanied by cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond
or certified check payable to the City of Hutchinson for 5 percent of the amount of such bid.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
Mayor
City Administrator
PUBLICATION NO. 6176
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER: Thursday, June I, 2000
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
To Whom it May Concern:
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on Monday. June 12, 2000, at 5:30 p.m. in Council
Chambers at City Hall for the purpose of considering a petition to vacate drainage and utility easements
located in Oadot A of Island View Heights 2nd Addition.
This hearing will be held by the City Council of the City of Hutchinson. At such hearing, all interested
persons may be heard.
Ci Admini for
May 30, 2000
Date
0
u
S--9.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT
To: Hutchinson City Council
Prepared By: Julie Wischnack, MCP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building
Date: June 7, 2000 — Meeting Date June 12, 2000
Applicant: Scenic Heights Investment
Property
Location: Outlot A — Island View Heights Second Addition
Brief Description
Staff is requesting the City Council approve the vacation of drainage and utility easements for
Island View Heights Second Addition within Outlot A. The vacation is required as a part of the
filing for the plat of Island View Heights Fifth Addition. Staff has properly published notice of a
public hearing for the City Council meeting of June 12, 2000.
Cc: William Gilk, Scenic Heights Investment
s--c
E
ORDINANCE NO. 00 -277
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA VACATING DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN OUTLOT A, ISLAND VIEW HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1 . Notice of hearing was duly given and publication of said hearing was duly made and was
made to appear to the satisfaction of the City Council that it would be in the best interest of the City to vacate
the drainage and utility easements locates in Outlot A, Island`V iew Heights Second Addition. The petitioners
requesting vacation of the drainage and utility easements as a part of the platting process for Island View
Heights Fifth Addition.
Section 2 . That drainage and utility easements to be vacated are described as follows:
All the drainage and utility easements as dedicated in Outlot A, Island View Heights Second
Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, McLeod County, Minnesota
0
0
Section 3 . This ordinance shall take effect from and after passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 27thday of June. 2000.
ATTEST:
Cary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin D. Torgerson
Mayor
From: Jeffrey J. Bloom
(320)286 -5676
Cyberie(alrocketmail.com
To: City Counsel
DP2000 Executive Summary
This proposal would bring several hundred computer users together at the Mcleod County
fair grounds in a festive atmosphere. The media coverage and uniqueness of this interactive event
would provide excellent exposure for the City of Hutchinson
The nature of this gathering is to provide an interactive live networking event. This event will
last for a non -stop 24 -hour period. This timing would serve all shifts currently available to every
individual interested in participating.
The location of this event will be one or more large building at the Fair grounds. This building
will provide finnittue and access to power. Computer links will be provided by the local facilities.
The proposed date of the event will be August 4 with setup on the 3. An informational
meeting will be held on June 23a 12:00pm at the Victorian Inn (Coach).
Your representative presence at this developmental meeting is very important. As we value
your input. We recommend a combined sponsorship of several community agencies to assist with
all incumbent issues.
The proposed cost is set at $5000.00, your sponsorship would underwrite some or all of this
cost. We propose that an entry fee be charged to help defray and return a large portion of this
cost to the sponsors.
The unique attraction and educational value of this event, will benefit local commerce and
compliment the community as well This event will draw individuals from all age groups and
geographical areas, to provide exposer to current computer technology.
Our experience in this type of event leads us to predict the type of audience that this will bring
in. These people are in general a diverse population of male and female, and a typical age span of
16-106 for the majority of participants. We recommend a minimum age of 16 without adult
supervision The number of participants would be restricted too approximately 100 under this
proposal (an expansion of this number could be accommodated as funding and demand). We
propose a gallery be provided for visitors and significant others, VIPs etc..
A detailed proposal of this event is available upon request.
i
6 -�
AI I sponsors will be mentioned at prize giveaways, raffles and tournaments.
• Standard Package:
o Cost= provide prizes (minimum of one prize value $50 US)
o Advertisement on the sponsor page in the form of a link and logo.
• Bronze Package:
o Cost = $50.00 US per event
o Advertisement in the form of a 110 x 60 banner on the event web site
(banner must be provided by the sponsor- limit file size to approximately
9k please).
• Silver Package:
o Cost = $100.00 per event
o Advertisement in the form of a 350 x (banner must be provided by the
sponsor - limit file size to approximately 12k please), and a single leaf -let
brochure in the welcome packet (sponsor must provide materials).
• Gold Package:
o Cost = $150.00 per event and must provide (2) prizes [minimum prize
value $50 US]
o Advertisement in the form of a 468 x 60, located at the header of each
page rotating (banner must be provided by the sponsor - limit file size to
approximately 12 k please), and a triple leaf -let brochure in the welcome
packet (sponsor must provide materials).
• Platinum Package:
o Cost = $200.00 per event and must provide (4) prizes [minimums prize
value $50 US]
o .Advertisement in the form of a 468 x 60, located at the header of each
page rotating (banner must be provided by the sponsor - limit file size to
approximately 12 k please), and a two page advertisement or brochure in
the welcome packet (sponsor must provide materials).
o Sponsor table on site free (sponsor must provide materials and staff)
L
Hutchinson Fire Department
205 3` Ave SE
Hutchinson MN 55350
May 26, 2000
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Brad Emans
Re: Rescue Vehicle Bid Opening
In order not rush into anything that we will sorry for at a later date I have
instructed the rescue vehicle committee to take there time, research all
avenues, meet with manufactures and come up with a new approach to the
problem of cost overrun on this project.
I can tell you there are very concerned about losing the funding for this
project if they do not get bids in soon. I hope you do not object but I assured
them it was far more important to the city of Hutchinson to get the best bang
for the buck than to meet any time deadline on this project! It has become
very apparent that we will not be taking possession of this vehicle until the
spring of 2001.
Therefore we have NO date set at the present time for bid opening.
Please contact me direct with any questions at 234 -4211.
Thank You.
7 -A
HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
•
206 MAIN STREET NORTH. HUTCHINSON, MN 55350
PHONE: 324587 -5252 • FAx:320 -587 -4752
WEBSITE: WWW.HU7CHINSONCHAMBER.COM
EMAIL: HCHAMBER@HUTCHTEL.NET
RECEM
May 26, 2000
MAY 3 0 2000
City of HuOdtkam
0
The Honorable Marlin Torgerson
City of Hutchinson
I 11 Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mayor Torgerson,
The 26th Annual Arts & Crafts Festival of the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce will be held
Friday, September 15, 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday, September 16, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Our Arts &
Crafts Task Force would like to request the following:
• Use of Library Square Park for arts & craft exhibitors.
• Closing of 1st Ave SE between Main Stmt and Hassan Street for Taste of
Hutchinson. For emergency purposes the alley behind 101 Park Place will be
continued to the south side of the park. No obstructions will be allowed in this area.
• Closing of Hassan Street between Washington Ave E to 2nd Ave SE for arts & craft
exhibitors.
• Closing of the following municipal parking lots Friday morning, September 15
through Saturday, September 16.
1) Corner of Hassan Street and Ist Ave SE for restrooms, garbage, recycling.
2) The gravel lot between 1st Ave SE and 2nd Ave SE for Taste of
Hutchinson vendor parking.
• Close parking on the East side of Main Street between 1st Ave SE and Washington
Ave and along on the South side of Washington Ave between Main Street and
Hassan St.
All exhibitors receive a parking authorization card. This card identifies vehicles parked in the restricted
lots and allows exhibitors to replenish their inventory during the event.
If you would like additional information, please contact the Chamber at 587 -5252. Thank you for your
help in making the Festival an event of which our community can be proud.
Sincerely,
Tina Vorlicek
• Office Manager
&mmdmeet to &wun naV Since 1945... f
.MaA& 4 A ALr oan a 6etteu place to tkae, wesk, and & fiwm ao!
HUTCHINSON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
206 MAIN STREET NORTH, HUTCHINSON MN 55350
PHONE: 320587 -5252 # FAx: 320-587-4752
WEBSTTE: WWW.HUTCHINSONCHAMBER.COM
EMAIL: HCHAMBER@HUTCHTEL.NET
RECEp,;M
May 26, 2000
Mr. Gary Plotz
City Administrator
City of Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street Southeast
Hutchinson, MN 55350
Dear Mr. Plotz,
MAY 3 0 2000
Clty of HuWlkls
The 26th Annual Arts & Crafts Festival of the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce will be
held Friday, September 15, 10 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday, September 16, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
We have contacted Mayor Torgerson, the Hutchinson Police Department, the Park and
Recreation Department and the Street Department for their assistance. If you have any questions,
please call the Chamber at 587 -5252.
The Hutchinson Ambassadors also wish to reserve all concession rights in the downtown area as
well as the control of any and all food exhibitors for the Taste of Hutchinson. The Ambassadors
have an agreement with MainStreet- Hutchinson regarding the operation of the Popcorn Wagon
during the event.
Thank you for your cooperation and for all the help you've provided in the past.
Sincerely,
Tina Vorlicek
Office Manager
..�I��WWl�1►.. �!�
&vnm&n& - d CO eCUll uuat# Since 1948..
Makln#RIdchimon. alean place t4 f me, W4XA, and da. BJwbw6 J
•
PUBLICATION NO. 6174
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
LETTING NO. 7
PROJECT NO. 00 -20
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Hutchinson, Minnesota
Dated: May 25, 2000
The City Council of the City of Hutchinson, Minnesota, will receive bids at the Office of
the City Administrator, 111 Hassan St SE, Hutchinson MN, until 10:00 am on, Friday, June
9th, 2000, for the making of the following described local improvement under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429:
Project No. 00-20: South Grade Road SW from School Road SW to Dale Street SW by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain
and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous
base, bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and trail and appurtenances;
9
all in accordance with the Plans and Specifications on file in the Office of the Director of
Engineering.
Immediately following expiration of the time for receiving bids, the City Administrator and
Director of Engineering will publicly open bids, in the Council Chambers of the Hutchinson City
Center. The Council, will consider said bids at 6:00 pm on Monday, June 12th, 2000 in the Council
Chambers of the Hutchinson City Center.
The approximate major quantities of work involved are:
ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
21" Sanitary Sewer
LF
2,000
Common Excavation
Cu Yd
17,000
Aggregate Base
Cu Yd
6,000
HV Wear Course Bituminous Mixture
Ton
460
LV Non Wear Course Bituminous Mixture
Ton
2,300
15 ", 18" Storm Sewer
Ft
1,800
4" Sidewalk
Sq Ft
4,800
3" Bituminous Walk
Sq Ft
15,000
8618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
Ft
4,300
Preformed Striping
Ft.
4,000
Sodding
Sq Yd
8,000
All bids shall be made on the Proposal Forms of the City and shall be accompanied by a
cashiers check, bid bond or certified check, payable to the order of the City of Hutchinson,
Minnesota, for not less than five percent (5 %) of the amount bid. All checks or bid bonds will be
held for thirty (30) days or until a contract is signed. Subsequent to that time, all non - forfeited
checks or bid bonds will be returned to the bidders.
Q —4
PUBLICATION NO. 6174
LETTING NO. 71PROJECT NO. 00-20
PAGE 2
All bids shall also be accompanied by the required Insurance Certificates as noted in the
specifications, and Certificate of Compliance with the Minnesota Workers Compensation Law.
Bids shall be directed to the Director of Engineering, securely sealed and
endorsed upon the outside wrapper "LETTING NO. 71PROJECT NO. 00 -20 ".
The City Council reserves the right to reject all bids and to waive any informalities and
irregularities.
Copies of the Plans, Specifications and Proposal Forms are on file and are available from
the Office of the Director of Engineering, 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 55350, and will
be fumished on request to any prospective bidder upon payment of $53.25 per set (NOW
REFUNDABLE) The successful bidder will be furnished free of charge, additional adequate
number of specifications.
Irar� n. rlarz/
Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
PUBLISHED IN THE HUTCHINSON LEADER ON THURSDAY, JUNE 1ST, 2000, AND IN THE
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN ON FRIDAY, JUNE 2ND, 2000.
•
RESOLUTION NO. 11495
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING &D AND AWARDING CONTRACT
LETTING NO.7
PROJECT NO. 00-20
Whereas, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the furnishing of all labor and material for the
improvement of
Project No. 00-20: South Grade Road SW from School Road SW to Dale Street SW by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain and
services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base,
bituminous surfacing, sidewalk and trail and appurtenances;
and bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying
with the advertisement:
Bidder Amount Bid
Duininck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN $742,540.32
Quam Construction Company Inc of Willmar MN $776,82925
Wm. Mueller & Sons Inc of Hamburg MN $787,932.69
D & C Dozing of Montevideo MN $825,806.82
Juul Contracting Company of Hutchinson MN $874,931.80
and whereas, it appears that Dulninck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN is the lowest responsible bidder.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
go 1. The mayor and city administrator are hereby authorized and directed to enter Into a contract with
Duininck Bros Inc of Prinsburg MN, In the amount of $742,540.32, in the name of the City of Hutchinson, for the
improvement contained herein, according to the plans and specifications therefor approved by the City Council and
on file in the office of the Director of Engineering.
2. The Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the
deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall
be retained until a contract has been signed, and the deposit of the successful bidder shall be retained until
satisfactory completion of the contract.
Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
Administrator
•
Is) IV4
To: Hutchinson City Council
Prepared By: Julie Wivchnack, AICP, Director of Planning/ZoningBuilding
Date: June 7, 2000 — Meeting Date June 12, 2000
Applicant: Wal -Mart Stores, property owner
Property
Location: North and Northeast of Wal -Mart Store, West of State Highway 15
Brief Description
The Wal Mart Plat which was approved in May needs to be revised based, on review by the
County. The property is abstract and torrens. The County is requesting that the abstract and torrens
areas be divided into separate lots. llu County is also requesting a new name for the plat Staff
has prepared a revised resolution for your consideration.
CC: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2001 SE 10° Street, Bentonville AR 720712 -6489
Greg Frank, Mccombs, Frank, Roos
11
0
MAW
0
LL-MART SUBD "ION 2ND ADE
— mc cc
37Cl2 K MA
EXCEP110N
_
� R
I
u
SM'Y'lrE .f!
-
s
� �A
trH'u t
I
n
I
-
i g
_
4CP �L ��'.- T.•
0
REVISED RESOLUTION NO. 11453
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT TO BE KNOWN AS WAL-
MART SUBDIVISION 2" ADDITION LOCATED NORTH OF DENVER AVENUE AND
EAST OF PROPOSED MARKE STREET
WHERE AS, Wal -mart Stores Inc., have submitted a final plat to be known as WAL -MART
SUBDIVISION 2n ADDITION of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under
the Hutchinson Ordinance, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder, and
WHEREAS, said plat is in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and
requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinance of the City of Hutchinson and
wit;
WHEREAS, said plat is situated upon the following described land in McLeod County, to-
Existing Legal Description: Lots 3 and 4, Block 2 of Paden 1' Addition
is Lot 1, Block 3 of Paden 1" Addition
Lot 1, Block 1 of Wal -mart Subdivision
New Legal Description: Lots 1, 2, & 3, Block 1, Wal -Mart Subdivision
2" Addition, McLeod County, Minnesota
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
That said final plat of WAL -MART SUBDIVISION 2n ADDITION is hereby approved and
accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and
regulations of the City of Hutchinson and the laws of the State of Minnesota subject to the following
conditions:
The applicant must execute the developer's agreement prior to
commencement of construction.
2. The applicantlowner is responsible for all construction costs associated
with the new streets (Market and Boston.).
3. The applicant must hold a preconstruction meeting with the City.
• 4. The City must obtain a deed to the property for the street prior to work
W I
Revised Resolution No. 11453
Final Plat — Wal -mart Subdivision
June 12, 2000
Page 2
commencing on Market Street.
5. The applicant must execute the maintenance agreement within the
document of a drainage and utility easement to vacated portions of
Boston Street and Baltimore Avenue.
6. Champion Auto shall have one access onto the new portion of Boston Street
and maintain an access point onto Baltimore Avenue.
Adopted by the City Council this 12' day of June, 2000.
ATTEST:
Gary D. Plotz
City Administrator
Marlin Torgerson
Mayor
0 Memorandum
To: Mayor & City Council
CC:
From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Date: June 6, 2000
Re: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING BROCHURE WITH
PROCEDURE AND PRACTICES
The attached brochure is a draft that was reviewed by the staff and directors. Its
purpose is to assist the public in understanding the process and proceedings at a City
Council meeting.
0 The intent is to include the brochure in public hearing notices for improvements.
A similar brochure is being developed for the Planning Commission meetings.
/mjs
Attachment
�--7)
Hutcon City Staff
City Administrator .....................Gary Plotz
Directors of:
Economic
Development ................ Christie Rode
Engineering/
Public Works ..............John Rodeberg
Finance. . ... ....... ...... Kenneth Merrill
Fire Services .................. &ad Emans
Liquor Store ...................Neil Wegner
Parks/Recreation/
Community Education ......... Doff Moon
Planning /Building
Enforcement .............Jdie Wischnack
Police/Emergency Management
Services ...................Steven Madson
WaterANastewater ....... Randy DeVries
City Attorneys. . ................ ..... Marc Sebora
Richard Schieffer
Human Resources ................Brenda Ewing
Motor vehicle Deputy
Registrar... ...................... Marilyn Had
Contact Administrative Secretary
Marilyn J. Swanson regarding agenda
scheduling/ questions at 320 - 2344202.
For more bdtomradon about
On City of Hutchinson and
dw Cny Council Meetings,
Including recent meeting
m1nutes, contact our websit
www.cl.hutctdnsmmn.us.
/ Ir
a at
City Counci &tangs
Second and fourth Tuesday, 5:30 p.m.
City Council Workshops
Scheduled as needed. Normally held at 4:00
p.m. on Council meeting dates.
City Center Hours
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Hutchinson City Officials
Mayor ...... .........................Martin Torgerson
(H) 587 -3243
(0) 2344479
Council Members ..................James Haugen
(H)587 -8425
Duane Hoversten
(H) 587 -7570
John Minar
(H) 587 -8263
Kay Peterson
(H) 587 -2348
Hutchmmon, Mumesotn 55350
(320) 587 -5151 • Fax (320) 234 -4240
www.cLhutchimon.mn.us
F-DA webske: www.hutchinsoneds.com
Welcoine
t o t
HUTCHINSON
CITY CouNcm
MEErnNG
Coy Oj"
I
N'el� this Hutchinson City Council
tnee; Input from the residents is Important
This brochure will help you to understand the
process and procedures for this meeting.
Meeting Times
The Hutchinson City Council regularly meets
on the second and fourth Tuesday of each
month at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers
at City Center. The mayor serves as the
presiding officer. The mayor and council
members each have a single vote. Three
members constitute a quorum. Most council
motions require a majority vote for passage.
The council also holds frequent workshop
meetings. Most are held at 4:00 p.m. prior to
the regular council meeting. These
workshops are scheduled during preceding
council meetings. All meetings, unless
otherwise noted, are open to the public.
All regular council meetings are broadcast
live and replayed on Hutchinson Cable Video
Network (HCVN) Channel 10.
Procedures
• Copies of the meeting agenda are
available just outside the entrance to the
Council Chambers.
• Do you wish to address the council on an
agenda item? Typically, the mayor will
ask for public comments when
appropriate. To address the council,
approach the podium and state your
name and address for the record using
the microphone provided.
The Agen*
Special Matters — deals with items such as
awards, prodamations, special recognition,
etc.
Minutes — acceptance and approval of the
minutes from the council and other
proceedings such as bid openings.
Consent Agenda — covers routine
administrative matters and may include
recommended planning commission items.
These items are not discussed, and may all
be approved as recommended on the staff
reports. The mayor will provide an
opportunity for a council member or citizen to
ask that an item be pulled from the Consent
Agenda for discussion. Items pulled will
receive separate action. All items not
removed from the Consent Agenda will be
approved by a single motion of the council.
Public Hearing - held as a separate Item of
business on the agenda, generally
commencing at 6:00 p.m. The public hearing
segment is your opportunity to tell the council
how you feel about issues scheduled to be
heard. Typically, a hearing follows these
steps:
• Staff makes presentation regarding the
hearing item
• Council members ask questions for
clarification
• Mayor opens hearing to the public
• Council discusses the item
• Council takes action
When you are called upon for your
comments, please step to the microphone at
the podium and state your name and address
for the record.
Occasionally, the counA continue a
hearing to another meeting before taking
action.
For some items requiring a public hearing
(i.e. street Improvement projects, street
construction projects, sewer projects,
assessment hearings) an informational
meeting may be held prior to the council
meeting. The affected property owners will
be notif led of the meetings by the
Engineering/Public Works department.
Communications, Requests and Petitions
— requests, reports and presentations to the
council that may or may not require any
action.
Unfinished Business — agenda items
continued from previous council meeting(s).
New Business — items intended primarily fc
council discussion and action. The mayor
has the discretion as to what, if any, public
comments will be heard on these items.
Miscellaneous — provides the council
members and staff to report on items which
directly or indirectly relate to the city.
Individuals who wish to address the council
on subjects that are not part of the meeting
agenda may do so. Typically, the council wil
not take action on items presented at this
time, but will refer them to staff for review,
action and /or recommendation for further
council action.
Claims, Appro"tions and Contract
Payments — action is taken to approve and
authorize payment of city bills and purchaser
Your input is welcome and your participation is appreciated
Memorandmi
To: Mayor & City Council
CC: Ken Merrill, Finance Director
Philip G. Graves, President HAHC
Dolf Moon, Director of PRCE
Vi Mayer, Executive Director Chamber of Commerce
From: Gary D. Plotz, City Administrator
Dab: June 7, 2000
Re: REQUIREMENT FOR PREDESIGN UNDER MINNESOTA STATE
STATUTE FOR COMMUNITY CENTER GRANT
. Mr. Jerry Winter, of the Department of Trade and Economic Development, has
informed the City that a predesign manual pursuant to the attached is required before
grant approval.
Secondly, the Minnesota Department of Finance requires substantiation that a one-
for -one state/local valid match has been obtained.
Concerning the predesign, the guidelines indicate on page 22, section 6.2, that the
cost for preparing the predesign may be up to $10,000. It is recommended that we
solicit proposals from area/local architectural firms to assist us in meeting the
guidelines in the predesign manual.
� f ;
n
�J
Predesign Manual
for
Capital Budget Projects
•
Revised June 1997
•
�-E-
V
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
page #
SUMMARY v
SECTION 1 CO
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
SECTION 2 CONTEXT FOR PREDESIGN 11
2.1 What Comes before Predesign
2.2 Design Stage Definition
2.3 What Signals the End of Predesign
2.4 What Is the Relationship of Predesign to the First Point of Major
Funding
2.5 What Is the Role of Predesign as Defined by the Law
MPONENTS OF PREDESIGN
Predesign Summary Statement
Project Background Narrative
Financial Information- Capital Expenditures
Financial Information -Ongoing Operating Expenditures
Schedule Information
Project Description
SECTION 3 COST PLANNING IS A KEY ELEMENT OF PREDESIGN 17
3.1 Basis for Cost Planning
3.2 Cost Planning Versus Cost Estimating
3.3 Cost Plan Chart of Accounts
• 3.4 Capital Budget Chart of Accounts
3.5 Capital Budget Request Construction Type of Space Listing
SECTION 4 MOST USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF PREDESIGN 21
SECTION 5 EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN 23
PREDESIGN
SECTION 6 EX
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
APPENDIX
ECUTION OF PREDESIGN
Who Performs Predesign
Cost of Predesign
How Predesign Is Paid for
Results of Predesign
25
GLOSSARY
A: Minnesota Statutes 16B.241
B: Capital Request Project Costs Form
C: Capital Budget Request Construction Cost Detail Form
D: Inflation Factor Table
E: Operating Costs Form
F: Minnesota Statutes 16A.695
G: Minnesota Statutes 1613.335
H: Minnesota Statutes 15.95
27
47
Page 6
• SUMMARY
Predesign is a systematic planning process intended to improve the overall statewide building design,
construction and operational process. Predesign follows the strategic and operational needs of an
agency while it precedes all design and construction stages.
The main premise of predesign is to communicate essential project objectives with factual data before
the actual design process commences.
Predesign is typically calculated at or less than one -half of one percent of the total overall estimated
project cost and the project scope is well defined before the majority of capital finds are requested,
appropriated, and committed.
Predesign tests project feasibility by ex aminin g and answering the following questions
• What need does the proposed facility fill as defined by the requesting agency's long-
term strategic plan?
• What are the project capital costs?
• What is the proposed project schedule when the funding sequence schedule for
• legislative action on capital budgets is considered?
To answer the foregoing questions, predesign should be completed for each project. The following
are the components of predesign:
1. A predesign summary statement.
2. Project background narrative:
• Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the project's operational
program.
• Summary of the requesting agency's own operational program for the project.
• Summary of the requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process.
3. Financial information:
• Proposed project cost plan.
• Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets.
4. Schedule information:
• Proposed project schedule.
• Proposed funding sequence.
40
page 1
5. Project description:
ArchitecturaUengineering program.
Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated into
the project.
The preceding components are explained in this predesign manual.
A predesign requirement has been added to Minnesota Statutes 1613.335, the statute upon which this
manual is based. The Department of Administration is implementing the predesign requirement on
applicable projects that received appropriations in or since the 1994 Legislative Session.
Questions regarding this document may be directed to the Department of Administration at (612)
282 -5005 (Mr. Wes Chapman).
Examples of Suggested Appropriation Language for Different Stages of Capital Projects
1. An appropriation for predesign only might read:
This appropriation is for the execution of predesign only. The $300.000
agency will be expected to make submittals for M.S. 1613.335,
Subdivision 3. •
The predesign will develop a report establishing the needs for a new
Marine Education Center at the Minnesota Zoo to assist it in
"strengthening the bond between people and the living earth." The
project will focus on creating a facility that will support the education
of the public about marine environments. Increases in operating
expenses brought about by this project will be home by the Zoo's
Special Revenue Fund.
(additional language as required)
2. An appropriation for design only following the execution of predesign might read:
This appropriation is for the execution of all design stages. The $1,950,000
agency will be expected to make submittals for M.S. 16B.335,
Subdivision 1.
(additional language as required)
Page 2
• 3. An appropriation for construction only following the execution of predesign and design
might read:
This appropriation is for the execution of the construction stage. $20,500,000
(additional language as required)
4. An appropriation for both design and construction following the execution of predesign
might read:
This appropriation is for the execution of design and construction $22,500,000
construction stages. The agency will be expected to make
submittals for M.S. 1613.335, Subdivision 1.
(additional language as required)
•
Page 3
1. COMPONENTS OF PREDESIGN 0
The components of predesign are:
t. A predesign summary statement:
• ?. paragraph that clearly summarizes the scope of work, the cost plan. and the
anticipated project schedule.
2. Project background narrative:
• Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the project's operational
program.
• Summary of the agency's own approved operational program for the project.
• Summary of the agency's needs analysis and planning process.
3. Financial information - capital expenditures:
• Proposed project cost plan.
• Operating budget impact.
4. Financial Information- ongoing operating expenditures: •
• Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets (state
agencies).
• Summary of proposed operating revenues and expenditures (nonstate agencies and
grants).
i. Schedule inforration:
• Proposed project schedule.
• Proposed funding sequence if applicable.
6. Project description:
• .Architecturai/engineering program.
• Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated
into the project.
Page 4
• Considered individually and in more detail, the components art;:
1.1 PREDESIGN SUMMARY STATEMENT
• The summary statement will be composed of a project name and usually a four
sentence (or less) project description. The predesign summary statement is a
description that will stay with the project through its completion and occupancy.
This statement could serve as the introductory paragraph to both the appropriation
language and the project description section of the Capital Budget Request Forms.
The description detail should be expanded as appropriate for each subsequent
appropriation request.
Sample Evolution of Predesign Summary Statements
1. Marine Education Center:
• At the beginning of a project, predesign should frame a project without the
constraints of cost or scale. A summary statement for a predesign (only) capital
budget request might appear in this manner:
The project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between
• people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement. The project
will focus on creating a facility that will support the education of the public about
marine environments. Increases in operating expenses brought about by this project
will be bome by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund.
• At the completion of predesign, there should be a range of costs associated with
scope of work and a general time frame for the project. A summary statement for
a capital budget request that has completed predesign might appear in this manner:
This project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between
people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement.
The existing 191.000 gsf facility will be expanded by remodeling and new
construction. The changed facility will include new pools for six dolphins, regular
and wet classrooms, an indoor dolphin theater, shark exhibits, and a reception area
for revenue - generating events. An anticipated $800.000 in increased operating
expenses will be supported by the Zoo's Special Revenue Fund.
New space: 42.500- 46,000 gsf
Remodeled space: 4,200 -5,700 gsf
Anticipated project cost range: $18.425 million- $20.575 million
Anticipated substantial completion and occupancv: Mid 1997
0
Page 5
• At the time a project is ready to go to bid, specific numbers should identify project size,
cost goals, and delivery date. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has
completed predesign and design might appear in this manner.
This project is to support the mission of the Zoo to "strengthen the bond between
people and the living earth," according to the Zoo's mission statement.
The existing 191,000 gsf facility will be expanded by remodeling and new construction.
The improved facility will include new pools for six dolphins along with isolation and
neonatal pools, two regular and three wet classrooms, an indoor dolphin theater with
a 1,500 person seating capacity, eight shark exhibits, and a reception area for 300
people with adjacent catering kitchen for revenue generating events. An anticipated
$847,000 in increased operating expenses will be provided by the Zoo's Special
Revenue Fund upon project completion in FY 1997.
New space: 45,900 gsf
Remodeled space: 5,510 gsf
Estimated project cost: $20.500 million
Estimated substantial completion and occupancy: August 1997
2. Humanities Commission Headquarters:
• At the beginning of a project, predesign should flame a project without the constraints •
of cost or scale. A summary statement for a predesign (only) capital budget request
might appear in this manner.
The project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning
methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities
Commission's mission statement. The project will focus on the revitalization of an
historic hospital building donated to the commission by the city of St. Paul.
Approximately one -half of the construction costs will be requested for capital funding
by the state of Minnesota.
• At the completion of predesign, there should be a range of costs associated with scope
of work and a general time frame for the project. A summary statement for a capital
budget request that has completed predesign might appear in this manner.
This project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning
methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities
Commission's mission statement.
The hospital has been evaluated for structural matters and found to be in need of no
improvements. The existing structure offers an excellent fit between the programmatic
needs of the commission and the general layout of each of the two existing floors. It
Page 6
. is felt that there is no need to add to the facility. The upper floor will house the
a dministra tive offices, dieting room, and classrooms, while the lower floor will serve as
the housing component for the programs offered.
Cost for the construction will be divided between a request for capital funds from the
Legislature and private sources. The increased operating expenses of the facility are
estimated to be $150,000 that will be covered by the commission in its operating
budget.
Remodeled space: 22,000 gsf
Anticipated project cost range: $2.54 million
Anticipated substantial completion and occupancy: Mid 1995
• At the time a project is ready to go to bid, specific numbers should identify project size,
cost goals, and delivery date. A summary statement for a capital budget request that has
completed predesign and design might appear in this manner:
This project will enable the commission to "reward and encourage exemplary learning
methodologies within the state of Minnesota," according to the Humanities
Commission's mission statement.
The upper floor will house the administrative suite of three offices, reception room, and
conference room. A dining room with capacity for 125 people and kitchen will be
•
located centrally to serve as a focus for interaction- Five classrooms, that will
accommodate 15 students each, will be located in the eastern wing of the main floor.
The lower floor will serve as the housing component, consisting of 45 single rooms
with a central lounge and laundry facility.
The entire facility will meet all applicable codes and incorporate new mechanical and
electrical systems. The anticipated operating cost increase, beyond current levels, is
estimated to be $110.000 in FY 1994 -95 and $280,000 in FY 1996 -97.
Remodeled space: 22,000 gsf
Estimated project cost: $2.500 million
Estimated substantial completion and occupancy: February 1995
1.2 PROJECT BACKGROUND NARRATIVE
Restatement of the statutory requirements that drive the operational program: This
listing should focus on the legislation that supports or demands the development of the
project either directly or in the form of the creation of programs requiring physical
accommodations and not simply indicate the appropriation that provided funding for
predesign. This is an opportunity to indicate the effect of expanding programs,
sentencing guidelines, or other directives creating the need to provide appropriate
Facilities.
40
Page 7
Summary of the requesting agency's own approved operational program for the project:
The requesting agency should provide the operational program to be supported by the
facility. The program should clearly identify the basic elements of what it is that will be
done, how, to whom, by whom, with what in terms of resources, and the results
anticipated and not record physical facility requirements.
Summary of the requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process for the project:
The requesting agency's needs analysis and planning process should define alternative
ways that were considered to meet the project's operational program requirements.
Alternatives may include using existing space, adapting existing space, performing new
construction, or leasing space. Collocation with other agencies for projects outside of
the metropolitan area must also be considered and a determination made and explained
(see Appendix A).
When alternatives have been defined, a preferred alternative should be selected that
maximizes program suitability and minimiz first cost and life cycle costs. The nature
and breadth of participation by user groups within the organization should be clearly
indicated.
1.3 FINANCIAL INFORMATION CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
1. Proposed project cost plan:
A budget using a chart of accounts with categories identified in Sections 33 and 3.4 and
following the formats shown in Appendix B and C should be provided. Costs indicated
in Appendix C should be divided into various construction types in Appendix B
according to categories indicated in Section 3.5. The source of these costs should be
clearly identified. The mflation factors required in Appendix C are found in Appendix
D.
• Actual cost histories, adiusted for program variations, that support the proposed budget
should be included if available.
1.4 FIN ANCIAL INFORMATION ONGOING OPERATING EXPENDITURES
Estimate of project impact on the requesting agency's operating budgets (for state
agencies): An estimate of project effects on operating budgets including statfing levels
and corresponding salaries and building repair, replacement. and maintenance should
be included This information should follow the format of information supplied in the
capital budget request forms (see Appendix E).
• Summary of proposed operating revenues and expenditures (nonstate agencies and
grants): A five -year estimate of operating budgets that identifies major categories of
expenditures and identifies associated revenue sources. if revenue sources include fee
Page 8
• generated revenue, a full description of these fees and the assumptions used in making
the projections and their justifications should be provided (see Appendix F).
1.5 SCHEDULE INFORMATION
Proposed project schedule: Predesign should include a realistic schedule for all stages
of the project. Site selection and acquisition, required government actions and
proceedings at all levels, designer selection, design approvals, construction, occupancy,
and commencement of operations ( commissioning) should all be included (if applicable).
• Proposed funding sequence: The schedule should include a funding sequence for the
project that reconciles the agency's needs with the alternate year capital budget cycle
if the project will receive funds from more than one appropriation cycle.
1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Architecttnai/engmeenng program: At least a summary level architectural/ engineering
program should be included Current conditions, adjacencies, special spatial issues, and
user needs should be noted where appropriate.
• Summary of information technology and telecommuting plans to be incorporated into
the project: Cost - effective information technology investments and telecommuting
plans that would enable an agency to reduce its need for office space, provide more
services electronically, and decentralize its services should be provided (see Appendix
G and IT). Notification from the Information Policy Office (IPO) of the Department of
Administration that such plans are or are not required shall be included.
ArchitecturaVEngineering Program Definitions
1. Types of Programs:
• The architectural/engineering program ( "a/e program ") compiles instructions to the
design professionals. The nature and extent of the instructions required are specific to
the project.
• Projects that have been built heretofore should not require an original program if the
previous work is still applicable. The existing are program can be used to direct the
design professionals.
• On the other hand, unique projects by definition require new instructions to guide the
design professionals. If the project is unique but simple and not costly, the are program
can probably be completed with the predesign work.
• At the other end of the spectrum, however, if the project is unique. complex, and
relatively costly, then the a/e program should be generally described during the
•
Page 9
predesign stage and the details added during schematic design. In this case. the capital
budget request should include finding for the detailed are program with the design work
but should be developed with the constraints established in predesign.
• The processes utilized to establish the program should strive to include methodologies
that strive to establish the greatest client consensus possible. These should be clearly
documented as a part of the program document.
2. Components of an ArchitecturaUEngineering Program:
• Summary of how the project will meet the requirements of the requesting agency's
strategic plan and operational program for the project.
• Summary of existing applicable master plans or other areawide (urban design,
architectural, or engineering) plans pertaining to the project.
• Definition of needs.
• The a/e program should define human and operational needs to be met by the project.
• Needs are derived from the operational program, programming interaction with
potential users, new or existing research, and standards for architecturallengineering
practice. The processes for deriving these needs should be clearly identified and
explained.
• Site selection criteria and site selection.
• If site selection has not been performed before predesign, then selection criteria should
be developed and site selection may be made during the predesign period.
• If schematic design of alternative solutions is both desired and highly dependent on site
characteristics, then final site selection may occur during schematic design and only the
selection criteria identified as part of predesign.
• Selection criteria should include collocation opportunities with other agencies.
• Audit of existing building's physical condition
• If the project involves modification of an existing building, the conditions to be changed
should be recorded. For example, if an existing building needs modifications to meet
code requirements for its intended use, then the required improvements should be listed.
• Differences from similar building types.
• If the proposed project is different from similar, well understood building types, the
Page 10
• differences should be highlighted. For example, if administrative offices are proposed
to have an unusually high potential for internal lavout change, the type of changes
expected should be defined.
• Design standards, guidelines, and performance characteristics for site and building
systems.
• The performance characteristics of physical components of the project should be
described. For example, with respect to heating, ventilation_ and air conditioning
performance: the inside summer and winter temperatures to be maintained, the
acceptable relative humidity range, and the outside fresh air ventilation rate should all
be defined.
• Individual space requirements.
• Size and characteristics of required spaces and rooms should be tabulated.
• Space and room adjacency requirements should be recorded.
• Special characteristics of rooms should be recorded.
• Extracts from the project budget and schedule that may apply to the work by design
professionals.
• Bibliography of applicable codes, standards, cited research, and other publications
referenced in the program. Current issues as applicable building codes, sun charts, and
building air quality guidelines are assumed.
Page l l
2. CONTEXT FOR PREDESIGN
2.1 WHAT COMES BEFORE PREDESIGN
Agency planting precedes predesign: Agency planning that precedes predesign is not bondable
because it is not project specific. After agency plannin B, the project process has three bondable stages
(see Figure 1):
• Predesign.
• Design.
• Construction.
Agency
Planning
Strategic
Operational
Program Bondable Activities
Needs Analysis
and Planning
Master Plan
Others
i
I
Predeslyn
Non-Bondable
Activities
Design
Schematic
Design
Development
contredt
Documents
construction
Administration
Construction
Bidding
Construction
Otxupency
Figure 1: Project Stages
Agency planning that precedes predesign includes:
• Agency strategic planning: Agencies are required in their capital requests to define the
long -term needs that drive capital budget requests. Long -tetra needs should relate to
the agency's total need for capital appropriations in the six -year cycle under
consideration.
• Project operational programming: The project operational program springs from the
Page 12
requesting agency's strategic planning and defines in functional and organizational terms
what the facility must do. The agencv should anticipate future changes in the present
operation for changes to be accommodated in altered or new facilities. However, the
program does not record physical facility requirements; the program describes what
activities the proposed facility will support.
• Needs analysis and planning: During the needs analysis and planning process, the
requesting agency estimates the amount and type of space required to satisfy the
operational program requirement. It also surveys its inventory of existing space to
identify alternative ways to meet its requirements.
When surveying its space inventory, the requesting agency should answer two
questions:
a. Is existing space available to meet the program requirements? If the answer
is yes, then reusing existing space is an alternative way to satisfy the program
requirements.
b. Is existing space, worthy of reinvestment, available for adaption to meet the
program requirement'? If the answer is yes, then adapting existing space
should also be considered an alternative way to satisfy the program.
In addition to using or adapting existing space, other alternatives such as leasing space
or new construction should be considered. Collocating with another agency is a
required alternative for projects outside of the metropolitan area.
When alternative methods for satisfying the operational program requirements have
been determined, a preferred alternative should be selected. Primary selection criteria
are program suitability, lowest first cost, and lowest life cycle cost.
Review of area, neighborhood. or campus master plans or other plans that may affect
the project: Project decisions should be made with the requirements of existing plans
in mind. These plans may include campus or area master plans or other plans prepared
and enforced by local levels of government.
• Identification of sites and definition of site selection criteria: Though alternative sites
should be identified and selection criteria proposed before predesign, actual site
selection may occur before predesign, during predesign, or as late as schematic design.
• Designation of applicable information technology: Before predesign begins, both the
type of information technology to be incorporated into the project and the
telecommuting plan for the facility should be defined. The desired results of these plans
should be determined. For example, questions such as: "What is the effect of
telecommuting on the size of full-time, on -site staff?" should be answered.
•
Page 13
2.2 DESIGN STAGE DEFINITION
Design follows predesign. Predesign defines the design problem to be solved. Design solves the
problem. The deliverables of the three stages of the design process are described below:
1. Schematic design:
The results of this stage are:
• a site lavout that satisfies the requirements of existing codes and ordinances and the
physical attributes of the site.
• an organization of the space list into two - dimensional plans and three - dimensional
stacking diagrams conforming to codes and the requirements of the
architectural/engineering program
• alternative schemes and a recommended preferred alternative that depict the general
relationships of spaces and the relationship of the building(s) to the site.
The deliverables of the schematic design stage are:
• diagrammatic site plan.
• diagrammatic plan layout.
• diagrammatic building elevations.
• diagrammatic longitudinal and transverse sections.
• outline specifications describing all physical systems including mechanical and
electrical systems.
• updated project cost plan.
2. Design Development:
The results of this stage are:
• a site plan that satisfies the requirements of existing codes and ordinances and the
physical attributes of the site.
• building plans. elevations, and sections defining all two - and three - dimensional
relationships.
• building plans, elevations, and sections depicting basic material and physical system
selections. .
Page 14
0
The deliverables of the design development stage are:
• site plans drawn to scale.
• plans, elevations, sections, and details drawn to scale depicting all physical systems.
• perspective drawings or models as required to explain the proposed design.
• revised outline specifications describing all physical systems including mechanical and
electrical systems.
• updated project cost plan.
3. Contract documents:
The results of this stage are drawing and specifications suitable to be contract documents for
the project.
The deliverables of the construction document stage are:
• certified, detailed drawings and specifications sufficient to bid, buy, and construct the
project.
• certified drawings and specifications that the local code officials will issue a building
permit.
• detailed cost estimate demonstrating that the work defined by the contract documents
can be performed within the project budget.
4. Construction administration:
2.3 WHAT SIGNALS THE END OF PREDESIGN
The boundary between predesign and design is marked by the completion of instructions to design
professionals (the architects and engineers) in a form sufficient to support commencement of
schematic design. These instructions are the architecturai/engineering program. A complete
definition of the architectural/engineering program is found in Section 1.6.
•
Page 15
2.4 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP OF PREDESIGN TO THE FIRST MAJOR
FUNDING
From the view point of the requesting agency, the question is: "What is the earliest time that it makes
sense to ask for capital funding for a project ?" From the view point of the Legislature, the question
is: "When can we understand the proposed project well enough so that an informed decision by the
governor and legislature can be made?'
A capital budget request can be made before predesign or it can be deferred until predesign is
complete. Not all projects with completed predesign will be funded for design and construction.
Nevertheless, the results of predesign provide essential information to elected officials while
minimizin cost to the requesting agency. This information forms the basis for a decision whether
a project should receive additional funding for design and construction. Therefore, it is not logical
to expect the Legislature to fund all three project stages at one time.
2.5 WHAT IS THE ROLE OF PREDESIGN AS DEFINED BY THE LAW
Minnesota Statute 166.335, Subdivision 3, requires the results of predesign to be submitted to the
Department of Administration before commencing design (see Appendix G). The Department of
Administration will review the results and make a recommendation to the appropriate chair of the
Senate Finance Committee and the chair of the House Ways and Means Committee with a copy to
the chair of the House Capital Investment Committee.
The Department of Administration will examine the predesign results for completeness before
performing its review. Completion of the projecPs operational program by the requesting agency will
be a prerequisite for consideration and a favorable recommendation by the Department of
Administration.
Page 16
0 3. COST PLANNING IS A KEY ELEMENT OF
3.1 BASIS FOR COST PLANNING
Cost planning is based on the principle that new project budget ranges should be derived from analysis of
historical data for similar projects. If the proposed project costs do not follow historical cost patterns, then
the reasons should be determined and explained in the proposed project budget.
3.2 COST PLANNING VERSUS COST ESTIMATING
Cost planning is different from cost estimating. Cost planning occurs very early in the planning process
before designs have been prepared. Cost planting relies on historical data and predicts all costs to be
attributed to the project. It answers the question: "Within what range will the project budget fall after the
project is fully designed ?"
Cost estimating starts after the design work has begun. usually during the design development stage. Cost
estimating is based on measuring material quantities actually shown in the design and deals with
construction costs. It measures only the project actually described in the drawings and specifications.
Estimating answers the question: "What is the estimated cost of the building as described in these plans and
specifications ?"
33 COST PLAN CHART OF ACCOUNTS
The project's cost plan should contain all project costs for a funding request. The capital budget chart of
accounts recommended for use during predesign is as follows:
1. Property Acquisition.
2. Predesign Fees.
3. Design Fees.
4. Project Management.
5. Construction Costs.
6. One Percent for Art (if applicable).
7. Occupancy.
8. Inflation.
9. Other.
(See Appendices B and C for detail.)
Relocation costs are included in item 49 and funded from the general fund and not bond sales.
Information regarding the Chart of Accounts will be presented when the Capital Budget Instructions are
prepared and forwarded to the agencies in advance of each bonding cycle.
i
Page 17
3.4 CAPITAL BUDGET CHART OF ACCOUNTS 0
All costs are to be quoted as of June l of the odd year prior to the even year that the Governor and
Legislature will consider the request.
1. Property acquisition:
• Land, land easements, options.
• Land and building.
3. Predesign fees.
3. Design:
• Schematic design.
• Design development.
• Contract documents.
• Construction administration.
4. Project management:
• State staff project management.
• Construction management.
• Other.
5. Construction costs:
• Site and building preparation.
• Demolitionidecommissioning.
• Construction (see project detail in capital budget forms item #5).
• Infrastructure /roads/utilities.
• Hazardous material abatement.
• Other.
• Construction contingency (unforeseeable issues only).
6. Percent for art (if applicable).
Occupancy:
• Furniture fixtures and equipment (not otherwise included in item 5).
• Telecommunications (voice & data).
• Security Equipment.
• Commissioning.
8. Inflation (Items 1 -7):
Page 18
• Midpoint of construction (date).
• Department of Finance Multiplier (percentl.
• Inflation cost.
9. Other (explain):
• Relocation Cost (funded from the General Fund)
3.5 CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF SPACE LISTING
•
Monumental office buildings.
•
Office buildings.
•
Computer facilities.
•
Library facilities.
•
Auditorium.
•
Cafetena/food service.
•
Medical facilities.
•
Parking structures.
•
Warehouse facilities.
•
Laboratories.
•
Higher education teaching/classrooms.
•
•
Office/adminis
Teachingilaboratories.
•
Maintenance facilities.
•
Heating/cooling plants.
•
Utility infrastructure facilities.
Is
Page 19
4. MOST USEFUL APPLICATIONS OF PREDESIGN !
Predesign is most useful for projects with the following characteristics:
• Unique projects (one -of -a -kind, or fast -of -a- kind).
• Complex projects (projects containing many interactive parts or systems).
• Relatively costly projects.
• Projects with unusually aggressive or complicated schedules (phased construction or
fast track construction).
All capital projects benefit by the clarity and condensation resulting from predesign. However,
predesign for relatively simple and low cost projects can easily be accomplished with relatively little
time, money, and effort.
Page 20
• 5. EXTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING PROGRAM IN PREDESIGN
The architecturaUengmeenng program ( "aie program") compiies instructions to the design
professionals. The nature and extent of the instructions required are specific ro the project.
Projects that have been built heretofore should not require an original program if the previous work
is still applicable. The existing ate program can be used to direct the design professionals.
On the other hand, unique projects by definition require new instructions to guide the design
professionals. If the project is unique but simple and not costly, the aie program can proiiably be
completed with the predesign work.
At the other end of the spectrum, however, if the project is unique. complex, and relatively costly,
then the ate program should be generally described during the predesign stage and the details added
during schematic design. In this case, the capital budget request should include funding for the
detailed ate program with the design work, but should be developed with the constraints established
in predesign.
The processes utilized to establish the program should strive to include methodologies that strive to
establish the greatest client consensus possible. These should be clearly docur. anted as a part of the
program document.
0
Page 21
6. EXECUTION OF PREDESIGN
6.1 WHO PERFORMS PREDESIGN
Depending on the size of the agency, in -house staff may perform the work or the agency may choose
to retain consultants. Some design firms (architects) are equipped and staffed to do the work-
However, a multidisciplined team should be considered where the project is particularly complex.
6.2 COST OF PREDESIGN
For most projects, the target cost for predesign should be one - quarter to one -half of one percent of
the combined project design and construction costs. The smaller amount (0.25 percent) applies to
large projects (costing more than $3,000,000 to 55,000,000) and the larger amount (0.50 percent)
applies to small projects (costing less than $1,000,000 to 52,000.000) or unusual projects. In
occasional circumstances higher percentages have been observed due to the relative size of the project
and complexity of the anticipated project. Achieving these cost ranges is highly dependent on the
agency's completing its agency planning before undertaking predesign.
6.3 HOW PREDESIGN IS PAID FOR
Predesign presently qualifies for funding by capital appropriation in the bonding bill. If the agency
is unable to await a capital appropriation, then the agency may perform the predesign using its own
operating funds.
Grant recipients who are required to provide matches for state funds are encouraged to include the
cost of predesign within their match portion.
6.4 RESULTS OF PREDESIGN
The main result of predesign is a clear definition of a project plan that, if implemented, will meet all
project objectives. The project plan is a reconciliation of the agency's operational needs with project
financial planning, scheduling, and the requirements of the capital budget legislative process.
Page 22
0
APPENDIX
•
L-1
Page 23
APPENDIX A
MINNESOTA STATUTES 16B.241
Sec. 40. [1613.241] COORDINATED FACILITY PLANNING. The commissioner of
administration shall develop a coordinated facility planning process for offices located outside the
metropolitan area for the following agencies: the departments of health, agriculture, and natural
resources; the pollution control agency and the board of water and soil resources. Any proposals
for consolidation or construction of facilities for these agencies that are included in budget documents
submitted to the legislature under section 16A.11 must fast be considered as part of the planning
process required by this section.
Page 24
i 0 r
APPENDIX B
CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST
PROJECT COSTS FORM
AGENCY CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST
Fiscal Years 1998 -2003
Dollars is Thouaods ($137,500 — $138 thousand)
CONSTRUCTION
TYPE OF SPACE
EXIS "PING
NEW ('ONS'I'RUC ION
REMODELED
RENEWAL(%,"I Prescrvatiaa)
Lip Major'I'ype of Space
(Office, Laboratory, Romp)
Gruss
Square Fra
Grow
Sgwre Feet
Cost
Cost Per
Square FoN
Gross
Square Feet
Cop
Coat Per
Sgaam Faot
Craw
Sgwre Feet
Coil
Cost Per
Sgare Fuwt
'I tyl Al.
COST
TOTAL
Page 25
APPENDIX C
CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST CONSTRUCTION
COSTS DETAIL FORM
AGENCY CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST
Fiscal Years 1998 -2003
Dollars is Thousands ($137,500 - $138 thousand
TOTA1. PROJECT COSTS
All Yu xnJ All Fm dln S(wrcce
Pnjed Carl
All Prior Y.
Project Cdr
F 19"-"
Pnjst Ce
Y
F 2UW UI
Prnjen C. r
1 Y. 2UU2 -03
TOTAL COM
All Yerrr
Projrtr Sun
IMux WYuQ
Pr�jrel F66h
(Mual✓Yor)
L Prpwy AcgdWlw
Lend, Lard hucmalls, ()nlwn9
_
Land and Buildings
SUBTOTAL
2. Preadp Fm SUBTOTAL
1. Duip Fw
Schemnic
Dmign Dcvclupm
Contwl Dacumenu
Cpuwction Admnutmion
SUBTOTAL
A. Prajm mksftz ed
Sole SuUPrcjecl Mara cmew
Conmmouo Mrm
Olhe .
SUBTOTAL
I Cr rwd. Cdr
So. & Duddin Ik alwn
DemlhlioVDecpv W
Com maion
InflrslrvclumJR ®de/llliliues
luardous Makrirl Abmnffl M
Olhu(cx Win}
-
ColWSuman Cw tmpwy
SUBTOTAL
6. One Peraenl 6r An SUBTOTAL
7. Occuprnry
Fumilure, Fialures and F:yul ..i
Tdmovrmnicrlioos (voice & dru)
Semrity
�
SUBTOTAL
& IaHtlam O len 1 -
Mi of Cao 'Ixw(dale)
Dagarmwni of Finv Mulli um(pe )
Inf6lioo Coo SUBTOTAL
1. 014r(aap6io) -
GRAND TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
Page 26
0 0 0
0
APPENDIX D
INFLATION FACTOR TABLE
J
u
Midpoint of Dept. of Finance
Construction MULTIPLIER
June 1997
1.000
July 1997
1.004
August 1997
1.008
September 1997
1.011
October 1997
1.015
November 1997
1.019
December 1997
1.023
January 1998
1.027
February 1998
1.031
March 1998
1.036
April 1998
1.040
May 1998
1.044
June 1998
1.048
July 1998
1.052
August 1998
1.056
September 1998
1.061
October 1998
1.065
November 1998
1.069
December 1998
1.073
January 1999
1.077
February 1999
1.081
March 1999
1.086
April 1999
l .090
May 1999
1.094
June 1999
1.098
July 1999
1.102
August 1999
1.106
September 1999
1.111
October 1999
1.115
November 1999
1. I l9
December 1999
1.123
January 2000
1.127
February 2000
1.131
March 2000
1.136
April 2000
1.140
May 2000
1.144
June 2000
t. 148
Julv 2000
1.152
August 2000
L 156
September 2000
1.161
October 2000
1.165
Nfidpoutt of Dept. of Finance
Construction WTLTIPLIER
November 2000
1.169
December 2000
1.173
January 2001
1.177
February 2001
1.181
March 2001
1.186
Apnl 2001
1.190
May 2001
1.194
June 2001
1.198
July 2001
1.202
August 2001
1.206
September 2001
1.211
October 2001
1.215
November 2001
1.219
December 2001
1.223
January 2002
1.227
February 2002
1.231
March 2002
1.236
April 2002
1.240
May 2002
1.244
June 2002
1.248
July 2002
1.252
August 2002
1.256
September 2002
1.261
October 2002
1.265
November 2002
1.269
December 2002
1.273
January 2003
1.277
February 2003
1.281
March 2003
1.286
Apn 1 2003
1.290
May 2003
1.294
June 2003
1.298
July 2003
1.302
August 2003
1.306
September 2003
i.3II
October 2003
1.315
November 2003
1.319
December 2003
1323
January 2004
1.327
Page 27
0
APPENDIX E
CAPITAL BUDGET REQUEST
STATE OPERATING COSTS FORM
3. CBANGES IN STATE
0"RATING COM I
Carreot Cwt
he)emd Can (Without Inlliam)
F.Y 19W"
F.Y. 2000.01
F.Y. 2002-43
F.Y. 2004-05
F.Y. 2006-07
Compuwdon (Progrun and
Building Oprndae)
O16a Progtun Mewd
Expettro
Bung Opmtirig Expenm
Sm&-( o Lase Evewa
'
Noonem-Oweed Load
Other Exprn : (rpenfy):
Revmte Ofrx
TOTAL
No. of F.T.E. Penomd
Page 28
• APPENDIX F
MINNESOTA STATUTES 16A.695
16A.695 PROPERTY PURCHASED WITH STATE BOND PROCEEDS
Subdivision 1 Definitions. (a) The definitions in this subdivision apply to this section.
(b) "State bond financed property" means property acquired or bettered in whole or in part with
the proceeds of state general obligation bonds authorized to be issued under article Yi, section 5,
clause (a), of the Minnesota Constitution.
(c) "public officer or agency" means a state officer or agency, the University of Minnesota, the
Minnesota historical society, and any county, home rule charter or statutory city, school district,
special purpose district. or other public entity, or any officer or employee thereof.
(d) "Fair market value" means. with respect to the sale of state bond financed property, the price
that would be paid by a willing and qualified buyer to a willing and qualified seller as determined by
an appraisal of the property, or the price bid by a purchaser under a public bid procedure after
reasonable public notice.
• (e) "Outstanding state bonds" means the dollar amount certified by the commissioner, upon the
request of a public officer or agency, to be the principal amount of state bonds, including any
refunding bonds, issued with respect to the state bond financed property, less the principal amount
of state bonds paid or defeased before the date of the request.
Subd. 2. Leases and management contracts. (a) A public officer or agency that is authorized
by law to lease or enter into a management contract with respect to state bond financed property shall
comply with this subdivision.
(b) The lease or management contract may be entered into for the express purpose of carrying
out a governmental program established or authorized by law and established by official action of
the contracting public officer or agency, in accordance with orders of the commissioner intended to
ensure the legality and tax- exempt status of bonds issued to finance the property, and with the
approval of the commissioner. A lease or management contract, including any renewals that are
solely at the option of the lessee, must be for a term substantially less than the useful life of the
property, but may allow renewal beyond that term upon a determination by the lessor that the use
continues to carry out the governmental program. A lease or management contract must be
terminable by the contracting public officer or agency if the other contracting patty defaults tinder the
contract or if the governmental program is terminated or changed. and must provide for program
oversight by the contracting public officer or agency. Money received by the public officer or agency
under the lease or management contract that is not needed to pay and not authorized to be used to
pay operating costs of the property, or to pay the principal. interest, redemption premiums, and other
�J
Page 29
expenses when due on debt related to the property other than state bonds, must be: •
(1) paid to the commissioner in the same proportion as the state bond financing is to the total
public debt financing for the property, excluding debt issued by a unit of government for which it has
no financial liability;
(2) deposited in the state bond fund: and
(3) used to pay or redeem or defense bonds issued to finance the property in accordance with the
commissioner's order authorizing their issuance.
The money paid to the commissioner is appropriated for this purpose.
(c) With the approval of the commissioner, a lease or management contract between a city and
a nonprofit corporation under section 471.191, subdivision 1, need not require the lessee to pay
rentals sufficient to pay the principal, interest, redemption premiums, and other expenses when due
with respect to state bonds issued to acquire and better the facilities.
Subd. 3. Sale of property. A public officer or agency shall not sell any state bind financed
property unless the public officer or agency determines by official action that the property is no longer
usable or needed by the public officer or agency to carry out the governmental program for which it
was acquired or constructed, the sale is made as authorized by law, the sale is made for fair market
value, and the sale is approved by the commissioner. If any state bonds issued to purchase or better •
the state bond financed property that is sold remain outstanding on the date of sale, the net proceeds
of sale must be applied as follows:
(1) if the state bond financed property was acquired and bettered solely with state bond proceeds,
the net proceeds of sale must be paid to the commissioner, deposited in the state bond fund, and used
to pay or redeem or defense the outstanding state bonds in accordance with the commissioner's order
authorizing their issuance, and the proceeds are appropriated for this purpose; or
(2) if the state bond financed property was acquired or bettered partly with state bond proceeds
and partly with other money, the net proceeds of sale must be used: fast, to pay to the state the
amount of state bond proceeds used to acquire or better the property: second, to pay in full any
outstanding public or private debt incurred to acquire or better the property; and third, any excess
over the amount needed for those purposes must be divided in proportion to the shares contributed
to the acquisition or betterment of the property and paid to the interested public and private entities,
other than any private lender already paid in full, and the proceeds are appropriated for this purpose.
When all of the net proceeds of the sale have been applied as provided in this subdivision, this
section no longer applies to the property.
Subd. 3a. Involuntary sale of property. Notwithstanding subdivision 3, this subdivision applies
to the sale of state bond financed property by a lender that has provided money to acquire or better
the property. Purchase by the lender in a foreclosure sale, acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure,
Page 30
or enforcement of a security interest in personal property, by the lender, is not a sale. Following
purchase by the lender, the lender shall not operate the property in a manner inconsistent with the
governmental program established as provided in subdivision 2, paragraph (b). The lender shall
exercise its best efforts to sell the property by the lender. A sale by the lender must be made as
authorized by law and must be made for fair market value.
Subd. 4. Relation to other laws. This section applies to all state bond financed property unless
otherwise provided by law.
Subd. 5. Program funding. Recipients of grants from money appropriated from the bond
proceeds fund must demonstrate to the commissioner of the agency making the grant that the
recipient has the ability and a plan to fiord the program intended for the facility. A private nonprofit
organization that leases or manages a facility acquired or bettered with grant money appropriated
from the bond proceeds fiord must demonstrate to the commissioner of the agency making the grant
that the organization has the ability and a plan to fund the program intended for the facility.
History: 1994 c 643 s 36; 1 Sp 1995 c 2 Art 1 s 19 -22; 1996 c 463 s 32
u
0
Page 31
APPENDIX G 0
MINNESOTA STATUTES 16B.335
Sec. 42. Minnesota Statutes 19934 Supplement, section 16B.335, is amended to read:
16B.335 REVIEW OF PLANS AND PROJECTS.
Subdivision 1. CONSTRUCTION AND MAJOR REMODELING. The commissioner, or
any other recipient to whom an appropriation is made to acquire or better public lands or buildings
or other public improvements of a capital nature, must not prepare final plans and specifications for
any construction, major remodeling, or land acquisition in anticipation of which the appropriation was
made until the agency that will use the project has presented the program plan and cost estimates for
all elements necessary to complete the project to the chair of the senate finance committee and the
chair of house ways and means committee and the chairs have made their recommendations, and the
chair of the house capital investment committee is notified. "Construction or major remodeling"
means construction of a new building or substantial alteration of the exterior dimensions or interior
configuration of an existing building. The presentation must note any significant changes in the work
that will be done, or in its cost, since the appropriation for the project was enacted or from the
predesign submittal. The program plans and estimates must be presented for review at least two
weeks before a recommendation is needed. The recommendations are advisory only. Failure or •
refusal to make a recommendation is considered a negative recommendation. The chairs of the senate
finance committee, and the house ways and means committee must also be notified whenever there
is a substantial change in a construction or major remodeling project, or in its cost.
(b) Capital Projects exempt from the requirements of this section include construction,
renovation, or improvements to darns, highway rest areas, truck stations, storage facilities not
consisting primarily of offices or heated work areas, trails, bike oaths, sewer separation projects,
water and waste water facilities, campgrounds. roads, bridges, or any other capital project with a
construction cost of less than $200,000.
Subdivision 2. Other Projects. All other capital projects for which a specific appropriation is
made must not proceed until the recipient undertaking the project has notified the chair of the senate
Finance committee, the chair of the house capital investment committee, and the chair of the house
ways and means committee that the work is ready to begin. Notice is not required for capital projects
needed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act or funded by an agency's operating budget
or by a capital asset preservation and replacement account under section 16A.632, or a higher
education capital asset preservation and renewal account under section 135A.046.
Section 43. Minnesota Statutes 1993 supplement, section 16B.335, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subdivision 3. Predesign Requirement. A recipient to whom an appropriation is made for a
Page 32
• project subject to review under subdivision I or notice under subdivision 2 shall prepare a predesign
package and submit it to the commissioner for review and recommendation before proceeding with
design activities. The commissioner must complete the review and recommendation within ten
working days after receiving it. Failure to review and recommend within the ten days is considered
a positive recommendation. The predesign package must be sufficient to define the scope, cost, and
schedule of the project and must demonstrate that the project has been analyzed according to
appropriate space needs standards.
The definition in paragraphs (a) and (b) apply to this section.
(a) "Predesign" means the stage in the development of a project during which the purpose, scope,
cost, and schedule of the complete project are defined and instructions to design professionals are
produced.
(b) "Design' means the stage in the development of a project during which schematic, design
development, and contract documents are produced.
Section 44. %finnesota Statutes 1993 Supplement, section 16B.335, is amended by adding a
subdivision to read:
Subdivision 4. Energy Conservation. A recipient to whom a direct appropriation is made for
a capital improvement project shall ensure that the project complies with the applicable energy
• conservation standards contained in law, including sections 2160.19 to 216C.21, and rules adopted
thereunder. The recipient may use the energy planning and intervention and energy technologies units
of the department of public service to obtain information and technical assistance on energy
conservation and alternative energy development relating to the planning and construction of the
capital improvement project.
Subdivision 5. Information Technology. Agency requests for construction and remodeling
funds shall include money for cost -effective information technology investments that would enable
an agency to reduce its need for office space, provide more of its services electronically, and
decentralize its operations. The information policy office must review and approve the information
technology portion of construction and major remodeling program plans before the plans are
submitted to the chairs of the senate finance committee and the house of representatives ways and
means committee for their recommendations as required by subdivision 1.
Subdivision 6. Information Technology Review Precondition. No state agency or department
shall propose and the legislature shall not consider building or relocation projects without reviewing
implications of utilizing information technology on space utilization.
•
Page 33
APPENDIX H is
MINNESOTA STATUTES 1595
Subd. 10. Capital Investment No state agency may propose or implement a capital investment
plan for a state office building unless:
(1) the agency has developed a plan for increasing telecommuting by employees who would
normally work in the building, or the agency has prepared a statement describing why such a plan is
not practicable; and
(2) the plan or statement has been reviewed by the council' and approved by the information
policy office.
'Government Information Access Council.
Page 34
0 GLOSSARY
Agency Strategic Plan: A projection of agency facility needs based on trends, policies, and
standards that define the need.
Architectural/engineering program: A written statement setting forth design objectives,
constraints and criteria for a project, including space requirements and relationships, flexibility and
expandability, special equipment and systems, and site requirements, if applicable.
Building Operating Expenses: Costs related to the operations of the physical building such as
maintenance, utilities, security, repair and alteration, and any other costs associated with the building
operations. (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2A20,
2A30, 2A90, 2B0, 2D10, 2D20, 2D90, 2J00, 2K00, 2K30, 2K60, 2K70, 2K80, 2K90, 2M00, 2M50,
2500, 2520, 2590.)
Changes in State Operating Costs: Serves in the capacity of a facilities note that seeks
determination of the project's impact on the agency's operating budget over a six-year period. This
requirement is mandated by state statutes (M.S. 16A.105, sec. 5, subd. 5). Both direct and indirect
costs should be identified for the current and future biennia including, but not limited to, staffing
costs, progratniservice costs, and increased building operation and utility expenses. These costs
should reflect the agency budget associated with the request.
• Commissioning: Is a basic four -part processing verifying: the review of the project program
through design and construction, the interaction and training process for facility personnel, the
correction of project deficiencies, and the recordation of warranties and guarantees.
Compensation (Program & Building Operations): Refers to all the direct and indirect program
and building operations staffing costs associated with this request. (This cost information includes
but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 1A0 -1E0.)
Construction: The total cost or estimated cost to the Owner of all elements of the project designed
or specified by the architect. It does not include the compensation of the architect and the architect's
consultants, the cost of land, rights -of -way, financing, or other costs which remain the responsibility
of the owner.
Construction Contingency: An amount of money set aside for unforeseen conditions in a
construction project. The amount can vary from 2% to 3% in new construction to 5% to 10 9 /6 in
projects of a remodeling nature based on project size and complexity. Differences in localized costs,
design contingencies, or other items should be factored into the general construction cost.
Construction ;Management: Management services provided to an owner of a project during the
design and/or construction stage by a person or entity possessing requisite training experience. These
services may include advice on the time and cost consequences of design and construction decisions,
scheduling, cost control, coordination of contract negotiations and awards, timely purchasing of
•
Page 35
critical materials and long -lead items, and coordination of construction activities. i
Contract A The duties and responsibilities of the architect and owners representative
(state) during the construction stage.
Contract Documents: The agreement between the owner and contractor, conditions of the contract
(general, supplementary, and others), drawings, specifications, and addenda issued prior to execution
of the contract, other documents listed in the agreement and modifications issued after execution of
the contract.
Department of Finance Multiplier: Referenced in the most current Department of Finance Biennial
Capital Budget Instructions.
Demolition/Decommissioning: Cost for razing a facility or removing from service permanently.
Hazardous material abatement associated with this action shall be itemized separately under the
Hazardous Material Abatement category but included in the total cost of the project budget.
Design: The stage in the development of a project during which schematic, design development, and
contract documents are produced.
Design Development: The stage of the architect's services in which the architect prepares from the
approved schematic design studies the design development documents, for submission to the owner
for the owner's approval.
Design Fees: These design services include normal architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical
engineering services that cover the schematic, design development, contract documents, bidding, and
construction administration stages of a construction project. Reimbursable items, additional services
and specialty consultants should be added.
F.T.E. Personnel: The number of full time equivalent employees/students associated with this
request.
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF &E): Items not normally considered permanently attached
to the structure but are considered a bondable cost and not part of the construction costs. Office
systems furniture is an example.
Hazardous Material Abatement: Any costs associated with the encapsulation and/or abatement
of hazardous materials in structures associated with the construction project.
Inflation: The rate that cost of construction increases over the duration of the project calculated to
the mid point of construction.
Infrastructure/Roads/Utilities: Costs for the construction or enhancements to infrastructure/roads/
grounds/utilities beyond the site perimeter.
Page 36
Life-cVcle costing: Life -cycle costing is a method of calculating the total cost of ownership over the
life span of the asset. Initial cost and all subseouent expected costs of significance are included in the
calculations as well as disposal value and any other quantifiable benefits to be derived
Nonstate -Owned Lease Expenses: All the costs related to a commercially leased facility. This
would include the lease (rental) cost, tenant (leasehold) improvements. security, and any other costs
associated with an agency leasing a commercial facility. lThis cost information includes but is not
limited to the following MAPS codes 2A00. 2A20. 2A30, 2A40, 2BO.)
Needs analysis: Includes estimates of amount and type of space needed, survey of existing space,
investigating ways to utilize existing space as an alternative to new construction, investigating other
alternatives to new construction, and identifying the selection criteria for the preferred alternative.
Occupancy: The purpose for which a building, or part thereof, is used or intended to be used
lUniform Building Code).
One Percent for Art: An allocation of one percent of the construction costs only (MS 16B.35).
Allocations may be exempted or reduced depending on the project.
Operational program: The operational function of a facility described in terms of services provided,
products delivered, activities performed resources needed, and results expected.
Other (specify): Other cost related to the project not accounted for in the previous categories.
Other Program Related Expenses (other than compensation costs): (This cost information
includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2CO, 2DOO, 2D30 -2D90. 2EO, 2FO, 2GO,
2HO, 2JO, 2KOO, 2K30, 2K60, 2K70, 2K80, 2LO, 2M0. 2NQ 2P0, 2Q0, 2R0, 250, 4A0, 4B0, 4CQ
5DO, 6A0, 6BO, 6CO, 6DO.)
Predesign: The stage in the development of a project during which the purpose, scope, cost, and
schedule of the complete project are defined and instructions to design professionais are produced.
Predesign Fees: The fees consumed in the preparation of the predesign document that can range
from';,% to 014% of a construction amount depending on the scale and complexiry of the project.
Project Management: Is the process of planning, scheduling, and controlling the critical aspects
of the Owner's program. The quality, budget. and deadlines are protected through the use of agency
staff (Owner Administration) and/or outsourcing (Construction Management).
Property Acquisition: The use of funds to acquire land, easements, options, or land with buildings
or other improvements.
•
Page 37
Remodeling (Adaption)(Alterations): Expenditures required to adapt the physical plant as required
to the evolving needs of the institution and to changing standards.
Renewal: Expenditures required to keep the physical plant in reliable operating condition for its
present use.(SCUP)
Revenue Offsets: New or additional revenues that are a direct result of the project's construction/
renovation. (This revenue information includes but is not limited to user fees and increased gate
receipts.)
Schematic Design: Drawings and other documents illustrating the scale and relationship of project
components.
Security Equipment: Specialty equipment usually supplied by a separate contract from those of
construction or FF &E.
Site and Building Preparation: Work performed within the perimeter of the land parcel but beyond
five feet from the existing structure or new construction that would include infrastructure/ roads/and
utilities.
State -Owned Lease Expenses: The rents paid for leases of spaces in buildings under the custodial
control of the Department of Administration. Rates for leasing space in these buildings are set by the
Department of Administration, Plant Management Division and approved by the Department of
Finance. (This cost information includes but is not limited to the following MAPS codes 2A10.)
State Staff Project Management: Costs an agency charges to a construction project to cover
internal personnel administrative management.
Telecommunications (voice & data): Specialty equipment supplied by a separate contract from
those of construction or FF &E.
NOTES "Owner" refers to the State of Minnesota. Some deficiencies are adapted from the
American Institute of Architects, the Society of State College and University Planning.
Page 38
RECEIVED
JUN 9 2000
•
E
0
A Petition
City of HutchftM
This is a petition for any residents living on the section of
Lewis Avenue, starting from Lake Street and going to Dale
Street, requesting the direction be made into a one -way street.
2, �-
1. "Irrsap".0r. LIG"N%
- � 7v_
4. 7"
$.
Address
900 L EWIS kEWC
sl;z5 L2 V'
6.a
7. I J `� 1 tip/
8.
9.
10.--
G U�
1 7 0- /
-7 Leak5
9-4
13.
r J r
14./
15.,
�u kc� G�
q Uo Leal L A ve
1 J N 1b L.O. -1) A-H"t Ce,+Ntr
17.
19. c. I1 �l�rL d i ✓v
20.fcotib cam'
21.
22.
23
9 e Letidi3 +�
1 08 Aw - at, .
(61�& &L4- a We�t)
24.
RESOLUTION NO. 11496
RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT
• ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039
LETTING NO.61PROJECT NOS. 0049100-12!00- 13M0 -17
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the
proposed assessment for improvement of
Project No. 00-09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by construction of grading,
gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and
appurtenances.
Project No. 00-12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman's 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to
Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services
bituminous wear course and appurtenances;
Projed No. 00-13 8th Avenue SW in Hunter's Ridge by construction of biturninous wear course
and appurtenances;
Project No. 00-17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by
construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and
services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous
surfacing and appurtenances;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON,
MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment is hereby accepted with the following revisions: a) Griffin Ave NE
Is hereby rejected due to high cost and will be considered next year; b) Michael Court NW, North of North High
• Dr to KDUZ - construction is reduced to sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and shall constitute the special
assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against lt. A copy of the
revised assessment is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10)
years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear
interest at the rate of _percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To
the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31st day
of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all
unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to cadtfication of the assessment to
the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the
15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount
of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which
such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through
December 31, of the next succeeding year.
4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County
Auditor to be extended on the property tax fists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid
over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted by the Council this 12th day of June, 2000.
•
Mayor
City Administrator
0 0 9
COMPILED BY: J RODFRERG
ASSESSMENT ROIL NO. 5039
LETTING NO. OPROJECT NO. OP09
GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE,
BIHIMINOUS SDRFAC G AND APPURTENANCES
f -
STREET COST PER FROM FOOT
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBFRG
$ -
WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH
CELEC BY: P. VANDER VEEN
04/04/2000
1ST HEARING
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
05/23/2000
2ND HEARING
INTEREST RATE
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 6.12 -2000
ACCOUNT
NO.
CITY PLD NO.
NMIB & ADDRESS
Of PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
FRONT
FEET
STREET
WATER
SERVICE
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NO.
1
31- 117 -29 -07-0060
Roger & Peggy DeMeyer
307 Griffin Ave NE
0
307 Griffin Ave NE
Lot 3, Block 3
13.100.0100
Hutchinson MN 55350
Nybe 's 2nd Addition
75
f
2
31- 117 -29 -07 -0070
Jason & Niccole Schwartz
317 Griffin Ave NE
0
317 Griffin Ave NE
Fly 76.97' of Lot 5,
23.102.0040
Hutchinson MN 55350
Nyber 's 4th Addition
90
f -
S -
f -
3
31.11729 -07 -0190
Troy Boettcher & Lisa Berge
205 Griffin Ave NE
0
205 Griffin Avc NE
Lot 12, And. Plat of Lot 10, Audi Plat S 1/2
23.232.0140
Hutchinson MN 55350
Secion 30 & N 1/2 Section 31- 117.29
66
f
S -
f -
4
31- 117 -29 -07 -0200
Brian & Kathlmn Zimmerman
245 Griffin Ave NE
0
245 Griffin Ave NE
Lt 5, Block 2,
23.100.0070
Hutchinson MN 55350
Nyberg's 2nd Addition
66
S -
f -
f -
5
31 -117 - 29-07 -0330
Richard & Jane Femholz
105 Griffin Ave NE
0
105 Gruen Ave NE
Lot 5,
2}p99.0030
Hutchinson MN 35350
Nyberg's 1st Addition
66
$ -
f -
f -
6
31- 117 -29 -07 -0340
Cameron & Jill Hempel
131 Griffin Ave NE
0
131 Griffin Ave NE
Lot 6,
21099.0040
Hutchinson MN 55350
N r 's In Addition
66
S -
f -
f -
7
31- 117 -29 -07-0410
Jeffrey & Teresa Schmidt
805 Main St N
0
805 Blain St N
Lot 1, And. Plat of Lot 10, And. Plat S 1/2
23.232.0010
Hutchinson MN 55350
Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31- 117 -29
61.8
f -
f
8
31- 1172907 -0550
jainim & Teresa Alders
25 Griffin Ave NE
1
25 Griffin Ave NE
Lot 8, And. Plat of Lot 10, Aud. Plat S 1/2
21232.0100
Hutchinson MN 55350
Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31 -117 -29
66
f -
f
9
31. 117 - 29-07 -0560
Emil & Virginia Vozenilek
745 Maio St N
0
745 Main St N
Lot 1, Block 1,
23.088.0010
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
66
f -
$ -
$ -
10
31 -117- 29-07-0650
Russell & Doris Nelson
746 Oak St NE
0
746 Oak St NE
Lot 10, Block 1,
13.088.0100
Hutchinson MN 55350
CoB eAddition
66
f -
f -
f -
0 0 0
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039
LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00-09
GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE,
BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANCES
$
STREET COST PER FRONT FOOT
COMPUTED BY: J ROD ®ERG
f -
WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH
CHECKED BYe P. VANDER VEEN
04/04/2000
1ST HEARING
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
05/23/2000
2ND HEARING
INTEREST RATE-
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 6.12 -2000
ACCO
NO.
CITY PID NO.
NAME Y ADDRESS
OF PROPERTY OwNPR
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVLSTON
FRONT
FEET
STREET
WATER
SERVICE
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY Pm NO.
11
31.11729 -07 -0820
Craig & Tammy Lauer
106 Griffin Ave NE
0
106 Griffin Ave NE
Lot 1, Block 4,
23.088.0270
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
66
S -
f -
S -
12
31- 117 - 129 -07 -0910
Ursula K. Smith
744 Elm St NE
0
744 Elm St NE
Lor 10, Block 4,
23.088.0360
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
66
f -
f -
S -
13
31- 117 -29- 07-0920
Ryan T. Huls
200 Griffin Ave NE
0
200 Griffin Ave NE
Lot 1, Block 5,
23.088.0370
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
66
f -
f
14
31- 11729 -07 -1010
Robert Arthur Jr. & Brenda Arthur
246 Griffin Ave NE
0
246 Griffin Ave NE
N64' of Lot 10, Block 5,
23.088.0460
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
64
f -
S -
f -
15
31- 117 -29-07 -1190
Anna M. Paul
755 Ash St NE
0
755 Ash St NE
Lot 1, Block 8,
23.088.0640
Hutchinson MN 55350
College Addition
66
f -
f -
S -
16
31- 117 -29 -07 -1280
Stanley & Lorraine Ronnei
756 Maple St NE
0
756 Maple St NE
Lot 10, Block 8,
23.088.0730
Hutchinson MN 55350
1 College Addition
66
S -
f -
f -
TOTAL • PROJECT NO. 00-09
10818
S -
1
$ -
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039
LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00-12
HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICHIGAN ST NE TO PAIR'S RD NE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES,
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE AND APPIIRTFNANCFS
$ 661.08
STREET COST PER PARCEUSOUTH PARCELS
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG
$ 403.99
STREET COST PER UNIT /NORTH PARCELS
CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN
S 850.32
UTILITIES COST PER PARCEL./SOUTH PARCELS
NUMBEROFYFARS: 10
04/04/1000
1STHEARI14G
INTEREST RATE
05/23/2000
2ND HEARING
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 0611712000
ACCOUNT
NO,
CITY PID NO.
NAME 8 ADDRESS
Of PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
UNIT OR
PARCEL
STRITr
UTILITIES
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMEN T
COUNTY PtD NO.
17
32- 117 -29- 14-0490
Kermeth Santelman Trust
106 Pauls Rd NE
106 Pains Rd NE
Lot 3, Block 1,
23251.0030
Hutchinson MN 55350
Santelman's Second Addition
1
$ 661.08
$ 661.08
18
32. 117.29- 14-0500
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
504 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Sieve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot I, Block 1,
21253.0010
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
I
S 661.08
$ 850.32
S 1,511.40
19
32- 117 -29- 14-0510
Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
512 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 2, Block 1,
23.253.0020
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
1
S 661.08
S 650.32
$ 1,511.40
20
32. 117 -29- 14-0520
Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
520 Hilltop Dr NE
I
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 3, Block 1,
23.253.0030
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
I
IS 661.08
S 850.32
$ 1,511.40
21
32- 117 -29- 14-0530
Momin side Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
530 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 4, Block 1,
23.253.0040
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Thud Addition
1
$ 661.08
$ 850.32
S 1,511.40
22
32- 117 -29- 14-0540
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
540 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 5, Block 1,
23.253.0050
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Thud Addition
1
S 661.08
$ - 850.32
$ 1,511.40
23
32- 117 -29- 14-0550
Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
550 Hilltop Dr NE
1
-
C/O Steve Klabunde
P O Box U
Lot 6, Block 1,
23.253.0060
Redwood Fags MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
1
S 661.08
$ 850.32
S 1,511.40
21
32- 117 -29 -140560
Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
560 Hilltop Dr NE
1
-
c/o Steve Klabtmde
P O Box 13
Lot 7, Block 1,
23.253.0070
Redwood Fags MN 56283
Santelman's Thud Addition
1
S 661.08
S 850.32
S 1511.40
• •
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. M39
LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00.12
HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICILIGAN ST NE TO PAUL'S RD NE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES,
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE AND APPURTENANCES
S 661.08
STREET COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PARCELS
COMPUTED BY: JRODEBERG
S 403.99
STREET COST PER UNITMORTH PARCELS
CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN
S 850.32
U [UT1IS COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PARCELS
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
04 /04/2000
1ST HEARING
tN1YRFST KATE:
05/23/2000
2ND HEARING
-
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 08/17/2000
ACCOUNT
NO.
CRY Pm NO.
NAME k ADDRFSS
OF PROPERTY OW14R
LEG AL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
UNIT Olt
PARCEL.
I SI7PPT
UIRLIDB
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NO.
25
32- 117 -29. 14-0570
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
570 Hdkop Dr NE
1
c/o Stew Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 8, Block 1,
23.253.0080
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Samelmm's Third Addition
1
$ 661.08
$ 850.32
S 1,511.40
26
32 -117- 2914-0580 ,
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
580 Hilho Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 9, Block 1,
23.253.0090
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelmm's Third Addition
1
S 661.08
$ 850.32
S 1,511.40
27
32- 117-29- 14-0590
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
590 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 10, Block 1,
23.253.0100
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Samelman's Third Addition
1
$ 661.08
$ 85032
$ 1,511.40
28
32- 117 -29- 144600
Mornin ide Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
600 Hilltop Dr NE
1
c/o Steve Klabunde
-
P O Box 13
Lot 11, Block 1,
23.253.0110
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Smulmm's Third Addition
1
S 661.08
$ 850.31
S 1,51140
29
32- 117 -29- 14-0610
Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
505 Hilltop Dr NE
0
_
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 1, Block 2,
23.253.0120
Redwood Falls MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
3
$ 1,211.97
S -
S 1,211.97
30
32- 117 -29- 14-0620
Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson
515 Hilltop Dr NE
0
c/o Steve Klabunde
P O Box 13
Lot 2, Block 2,
23.253.0130
Redwood Fags MN 56283
Santelman's Third Addition
3
S 1,211.97
S -
S 1,211.97
31
32- 117 -29- 14-0830
Margaret Shaffer
111 Mornside Dr NE
0
111 Morningside Dr NE
Unit Ill be .167% Common Area
23.255.0040
Hu¢hintan MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate
1
S 403.99
$ -
S 403.99
32
32- 117 -29- 14-0840
Delbert k Janice Klabunde
113 Morningside Dr NE
0
113 Morningside Dr NE
Unit 113 be .166% Common Area
23.255.0050
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Mormapide Estate
1
S 403.99
S -
$ 403.99
33
32- 117 -29- 14-0850
Sandra Bonniwell
1115 Morningside Dr NE
0
115 Morningside Dr NE
jUnu 115 bt .167% Common Arm
23.255.0060
lHutchimon MN 55350
lCondomi No. 6, Morningside Estate
1
$ 403.99
S -
S 403.99
0
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5079
LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00.12
HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICHIGAN ST NE TO PAUL'S RD NE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES,
BITUMINOUS V EAR COURSE AN D APPURTENANCES
S 661.08
STREET COST PER PAR PARCELS
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG
$ 403.99
STREET COST PER UNIT/NORTH PARCELS
CHECKED BY: P. V ANDER VEIN
$ 850.32
UTTIIHES COST PER PARCEL/SOUTH PAR c
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
04/04/2000
IST HEARING
INTEREST RATE
05/23/2000
2ND HEARING
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 08172/2000
ACCOLU
NO.
cnT PID NO.
NAME & ADDRESS
OF PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
UNIT OR
PARCEL
STREET
UTILITIES
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PH) NO.
34
32- 117 -29 -14 -1010
JiU Marie Forbes
104 Morningside Dr NE
0
104 Morningside Dr NE
Unit 104,
23.255.0220
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate
l
S 403.99
S -
f 403.99
35
32- 117 -29- 14-1020
Roben & Charlotte Hanson
106 Morningside Dr NE
0
106 Morningside Dr NE
Unit 106,
23.255.0230
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Mornin ide Estate
1
f 403.99
S -
f 403.99
36
32- 117 -29-14 -1030
Lori Waldera-Tarafa
108 Morningside Dr NE
0
108 Morningside Dr NE
Unit 108 & .167% Common Am,
23.255.0240
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate
1
f 403.99
f -
f 403.99
37
32- 117 -29 -14 -1070
Thu & Guynh Nguyen
515 Hilltop Dr NE
0
525 Hillto Dr NE
Unit 525 &. 167% Common Area,
23.255.0280
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Esuw
1
$ 403.99
f -
S 403.99
38
32- 117 -29 -14 -1080
Ardis & Leola Hoversten
527 Whop Dr NE
0
527 Hilltop Dr NE
Unit 527 & ,167% Common Area,
23.255.0290
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate
1
S 403.99
$ -
f 403.99
39
32- 117.29 -14 -1090
Cheryl Lobar
529 Hilhop Dr NE
0
-
529 Hilko Dr NE
Unit 529 &,167% Common Area,
23.255.0300
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate
1
S 403.99
S -
f 403.99
40
32- 117 -29- 14-1100
Alm Cook
535 Hilltop Dr NE
0
535 Hilltop Dr NE
Unit 535 &.167% Common Area
23.255.0310
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No, 6, Morningside Esnre
1
f 403.99
f -
S 403.99
41
32 -117 -29-14 -1110
Verdella Demen a
537 Hilltop Dr NE
0
537 Hilltop Dr NE
Unit 537 &.167% Common Area,
23.255.0320
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Morningside Emote
1
S 403.99
$ -
f 403.99
42
32- 117.29- 14-1120
Linda Rick
539 Hilltop Dr NE
0
539 Hilltop Dr NE
Unit 539 &.167% Common Area,
23.255.0330
Hutchinson MN 55350
Condominium No. 6, Mornin side Emote
1
f 403.99
S -
S 403.99
TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00.12
30
f 15,204.78
S 9,364.52
$ 24,558.30
0
0 9
COMPILED BY: ) RODEBPRG
ASSESSMENT' ROLL NO. 5039
LE `r1NG NO.6/PROJECT NO. 00-13
LTH AVENUE SW IN HUNTER'S RIDGE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE k APPURTENANCES
S 1,137.39
STREET COST PER EACH
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG
CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN
04/0412000
1ST HEARING
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
03/23/2000
IND HEARING
INTEREST RATE-
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 611212000
ACCOUNT
NO.
CIIY PID NO.
NAlB Y ADDRESS
OF PROPERTY OWN"
LEGAL DCSCRIPIION
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
EACH
STREET
CREL)rr
TOTAL ACII M
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NO.
43
02- 11630 - 16-0050
Mark & Ruth Senn
1447 8th Ave SW
1447 8th Ave SW
Lot 1, Block 1,
23.420.0010
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
S 1,137.39
S -
f 1,137.39
44
02116- 30160060
Joe[ & Karen Dettman
1441 8th Ave SW
1441 8th Ave SW
Lot 2, Block 1,
23420.0020
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
f 1,137.39
$ -
S 1,13739
45
02- 11630- 16-0'r0
Bruce Elhg
1435 8th Ave SW
1435 81h Ave SW
Lot 3, Block 1,
_
23.420.0030
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ride
1
f 1,137.39
f
S 1,137.39
46
02- 1163016-0080
Kevin Compton
1431 8th Ave SW
18482 202nd
Cir
Lot 4, Black 1,
23.420.0040
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ri e
1
f 1,137.39
f -
$ 1,13739
47
02- 11630.160090
David & Pamela Johnston
1427 81h Ave SW
1427 8th Ave SW
Lot 5, Block 1,
23.420.0050
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
f 1,137.39
f -
S 1,137.39
48
02- 11630-16-0100
Todd & Marie Petsinger
1423 8th Ave SW
•
1423 8th Ave SW
Lot 6, Block 1,
23.420.0060
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
S 1,13739
S -
S 1,137.39
49
02.11630160110
Kevin & Darla Keith
1417 8th Ave SW
1417 8th Ave SW
Lot 7, Block 1,
23.420.0070
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
f 1,137.39
f -
f 1,137.39
50
02- 11630160120
Darwin & Lorine Maus
1448 8th Ave SW
1448 8th Ave SW
Lot 1, Block 2,
23.420.0080
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ri e
1
f 1,137.39
f -
f 1,137.39
51
02- 11630.1601.:0
Ronald & Susan McKinnon
1444 8th Ave SW
1444 8th Ave SW
Lot 2. Block 2,
23.420.0090
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
S 1,137.391
f
f 1,137.39
52
02- 11630.16-0140
Janet Krumrey
850 Hunters St SW
850 Hunters St SW
Lot 3, Block 2,
23.420.0100
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
f 1,137.39
IS
f 1,137.39
0 0
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039
LEMNG NO. 6/PROJECT NO. DD-13
STH AVENUE SW IN HUNTER'S RIDGE
BY CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE & APPURTENANCES
$ 1,137.39
STREET COST PER EACH
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG
CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN
04/04/2000
1ST HEARING
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
05/23/2000
1ND HEARING
INTEREST RATE
05/23/2000
ADOPTED REVISED 8!77!7000
A
NO.
CRY PID NO.
NAME &ADDRESS
OF PROMMTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRUMON
ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION
EACH
STREET
CItPDrr
TOTAL ACHVR
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY Pm NO.
53
02.11630160150
Karen Cr ago
1404 8th Ave SW
1404 8th Ave SW
Lot 1, Block 3,
23.420,0110
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ride
1
S 1,137.39
f -
S 1,137.39
54
02- 11630 - 160166
Mark & Robin Liun ren
1408 8th Ave SW
1408 8th Ave SW
Lot 2, Block 3,
21420.0120
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
I
S 1,137.39
f -
f 1,137.39
55
02. 11630160170
Loren & Deborah Ra ow
1414 8th Ave SW
1414 8th Ave SW
Lot 3, Block 3,
23.420.0130
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ride
1
S 1,137.39
f -
f 1,137.39
56
02- 1163016-0180
Dennis & Kuen Ingle
1418 8th Ave SW
1418 8th Ave SW
Lot 4, Block 3,
23.420.0140
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
f 1,137.39
f -
f 1,137.39
57
02- 1163016-0190
Dean & Kimberly Brehmer
Lot 5, Black 3,
1424 8th Ave SW
1424 8th Ave SW
23.420.0150
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's R4,
1
S 1,13739
f -
S 1,13739
58
02- 11630160200
Richard Nay & Sherry Mischel-Nagy
Lot 6, Block 3,
1430 8th Ave SW
1430 8th Ave SW
23,420.0160
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ride
1
f 1,137.39
f -
$ 1,137.39
59
02 -11 &30160210
jKathy Hintze
Lot 7, Block 3,
855 Hunters St SW
855 Hunters St SW
23.420.0170
Hutchinson MN 55350
Hunter's Ridge
1
S 1,137.39
f -
$ 1,137.39
TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 0013
1 7
f 19,335.63
f -
f 19,335.63
9
0 0
COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG
ASSESSMENT ROLL. N0. 5039
IETTMG NO. 6/PROJECT NO. 00.17
MICHAEL COURT NV: NORTH OF NORTH HIGH DR TO KDUZ
BY CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER & SERVICES
$ .
STREET COST PER EACH
COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG
$ -
W ATIRMAIN COST PER EACH
CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN
$ 13,485.98
SANITARY SEVER COST PER EACH
NUMBER OF YEARS: 10
04/04/2000
1ST HEARING 2ND HEARING 05/23/2000
INTEREST RATE
05/23/2000 -
ADOPTED REVISED 06172/2000
ACCOUNT
NO.
CM Pm NO.
NAME & ADDRESS
OF PROPERTY OWNER
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADDITION OR SUBDIYMN
EACH
SIREEr
WATERMU4
SANITARY
SEWER
TOTAL ACTIVE
ASSESSMENT
COUNTY PID NO.
60
30117 -29- 14-0010
Golden Oaks Investment Co.
45 North High Dr NW
C/o Eaem
610 Virginia Shores Cir
Lot 1, Block 1,
23.398.0010
Excelsior MN 55331
Boyle's Addition
1
$ -
S -
S 13,485.98
f 13,485.98
61
34117.29- 14-0020
Chet & Associates
110 Michael Ct NW
163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd
Lot 2, Block 1,
23.398.17020
MinonK WI 54859 -9463
Boyle's Addition
1
$ -
f -
f 13,485.98
S 13,485.98
62
30117.29.14 -0030
Chet & Associates
120 Michael Ct NW
163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd
Lot 3, Block 1,
23.398.0030
Minong WI 54859 -9463
Boyle's Addition
1
S -
$ -
$ 13,485.98
$ 13,485.98
63
30117- 29- 14-DAO
Chu & Associates
125 Michael Ca NW
163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd
Lot 4, Block 1,
23398.0040
Minong WI 54859 -9463
Boyle's Addition
1
$ -
$ -
f 13,485.98
S 13,485.98
64
30-117 -29- 14-0050
Chet & Associates
115 Michael Ct NW
163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd
Lot 5, Block 1,
23.398.0050
Minong WI 54859.9463
Boyle's Addition
1
S -
$ -
$ 13,485.98
$ 13,485.98
65
30-117 -29-14 -0060
Chet & Associates
105 Michael Ct NW
163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd
Lot 6, Block 1,
23. 398.0060
Minong WI 54859 -9463
Boyle's Addition
1
$ -
$ -
$ 13,485.98
S 13,485.98
TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00-17
6
SO.00
50.00
$80,915.88
$80,915.88
PROJECT NO. 00-12
$24,558.30
PROJECT NO. 00.13
$19,335.63
'
PROJECT NO. 0017
$80,915.88
TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROLL 5039
f 124,809.81
Proposed Market
As we discussed at our meeting, the defined marketplace for different levels of the organization will
change. The purpose of this list is to propose those jurisdictions which should play a role in further
discussions:
Jurisdiction
Based on...
Classifications...
McLeod County
Geography
All
Meeker County
Geography
All
Carver County
Geography
All
Sibley County
Geography
All
Renville County
Geography
All
Wright County
Geography
All
Glencoe
Geography
Non- exempt
Litchfield
Geography
Non- exempt
Norwood Young America
Geography
Non - exempt
Cokato
Geography
Non - exempt
Olivia
Geography
Non- exempt
Chaska
Population
All
Chanhassen
Population
All
Shakopee
Population
Prof/Managerial
Prior Lake
Population
Prof/Managerial
Farmington
East Bethel
Population
Population
Prof/Managerial
PF004onageriel
FTT R#X x
Popntatipn
rrof/Mtrpagex l
Champlin
Population
Prof/Managerial
Owatonna
Population
Prof/Managerial
Albert Lea
Population
Prof/Managerial
St. Cloud
Population
Prof/Managerial
Mankato
Population
Prof/Managerial
Hastings
Population
Prof/Managerial
Savage
Population
Prof/Managerial
Northfield
Population
Prof/Managerial
From our discussions, we understand that the list of jurisdictions to comprise the City's
chosen market place may have longevity; that is, the City will use this list again in the
future.
I,'
A,
HHPOP Homebuyer Funds Requested
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
11
Loan #
XXXX
X_UX
8 700
87
XXXX
XXXX
8702_
8703
8704
8705
8
Closing
CAS A_
PROGRAMS
ECHO
Total
Fu nding _
$1,040
$86,514
$105,055
$114,500
$
$1
$11 5,625
$_11_3,425
$1 _
$1
$11
Com-
ments
DON E_
site _
Island View Heights
Island Vie H
Rolling Me
Island View H
I sland Vi ew Heights
Isla V iew He ights
Roll M eadows
Rolling Meadow
Rolling Meadows
Rolling Meadows
Rolling Meadows
R ollin g_ M
_ Date
8/19/99
9130/9
1/28/00
1/31/00
_21
2/1/00
3/16/0
3/30/00
3/31/00
3/31/00
4/21/00
D TED
D iscount
HRA GA_P
MC
HAF /ECL_
$9
_
$18,000
_
$18, 000
$18,000
_
$18,0
$1,040
$ 2,000
$2,000
_
$2,000
_$2
$2,000
$2,0 __
$2,000
_
DONE
DONE
DONE
_
D
DONE
_D O N N E_
DO
DONE
DO
DO
12
8707
4/28/00
$20,000
$1,040
$21,040
,DON
13
14
8708
'--
8709
Rolling Meadows
--- -- - --- - --
Rol M eadows
4128/
$93,065
$18,000
$2,000
$2,000
_
_
$113,065_
_
$ 115,625
DON _
DONE
-_.__.
5/ 24/00
$113,62
15
8710
Is lan d Vie H eights
5 /31/00
$9
$
$ 2,000
_
$115,445
_
DONE
1 6
8711
Island View Heights
6 /19/00
$
$ 20,00 0
$2,000
$10,00_0
$ 102,599
R_e
17
18
8712
8713
Island View Heights
Rolling Meadows
Island Vi ew Heights
Rolling Mead
Rol Mea dows
Island Vi ew Heights
6/23/00
$109,000
$
$7,750
$11 6,750
_
Re
6 /30/0 0
$18,000
$121,531
_
19
20
21
22
87
6
6/30/00
6/3
7/3
$112,D00
$1 _
__
$18,000
_
__$2,000
$2,0
$2,0 0_0
$_
_
$114,00
$109,12
$_1 17,600
$ 115,225
A ppr.
Appr.
Appr.
bb
8 715
87
23
871
Rolling Meadows
8/1100
$ 85,345
$20 ,000
$2,000
$10,000
$117,345
24
25
26
27
8718
Island View Heights
Rolling Meadows
Rolling Meadows
Island View Heights
CASA 1999 Funds
8/15/00
$113,625
$ 2,00 0
$ 115,625
_App_r
XXXX
8719
M
8/16/00
$115,593
$2,000
$115,593
$1 15, 6 25
$705,525
$2,830,202
Res.
S ept.
$113,625
_
$211,750
10/12/00
$103,525
$2,558,772
$2,
Totals
$2,080
$37,600
$0 $20,000
Revised 6/1212000
G: /HRA/1999 SCDP /HHPOP Funding Log (nameless)
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT A
12 -JUN -2000 (15:54) page 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL FUND BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS RIBBONS $862.07
• < *> $862.07*
WATER /SEWER FUND BUSINESSWARE SOLUTIONS CABLE $2,437.46
< *> $2,437.46*
$3,299.53*
•
•
i
,OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 1
--- -------
1990
- - - - -- __-- - - - -__ _ - - -__ ___- _----------
TIDS FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA AGENT FEES
- - - -__ __
$461.76
GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES
•
< >
$461.76*
$15.59
CAP.IMPRO.FUND
BAILEY NURSERIES TREES /SHRUBS
$368.79
CROW RIVER GLASS
< *>
$368.79*
HANDBOOK
CMaIdYY;l \ \Rel: \ ;7
ENERGY LOAN FD
R:�17
•
BRANDON TIRE CO
TIRES
$761.97
GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES
CAMERA SHOP
DEVELOPE & PRINT
$29.41
$15.59
COAST TO COAST
SUPPLIES
$16.29
CROW RIVER GLASS
WINDSHIELD
$436.59
HANDBOOK
FARM -RITE EQUIPMENT
PARTS, LABOR
$916.03
$10.00
FAYE & DAVE'S UPHOLSTERY
UPHOLSTER BUCKET SEAT
$203.90
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$71.83
FLOWERS
GARD SPECIALISTS
GARDSERT
$52.62
$45.00
HARPEL BROS.INC
PUMP KIT
$144.04
HART'S AUTO SUPPLY
FRONT PADS, CLIPS
$95.14
SR CENTER BLDG SUPV
HUTCH AUTO SALVAGE
LEAF SPRING
$63.90
$11.00
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
CREDIT RETURN
$2,098.63
INTERSTATE BATTERIES
BATTERIES
$644.91
SLANT FILE
JERRYS TRANSMISSION
PARTS, LABOR -1996 MACK CL713
$2,178.18
$1,006.43
L & P SUPPLY CO
REPAIR TIRE
$954.03
LTP ENTERPRISES
1" CHECK VALVES
$19.70
CREDIT
MACQUEEN EQUIP INC
HANDLE WELDMENT
$35.11
$51.37
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
SHOP PARTS
$33.09
PENSKE AUTO CENTER
OIL CHANGE
$86.14
REFUND- CANCEL DEFENSIVE DRIVE
PLOWMANS
PARTS
$158.87
$190.49
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
JACK
$79.65
SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GROUP
PIPE MOUNT
$178.33
GLOVE HOLDER, PHONE CASE
SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
AIR RATCHET
$106.50
$360.00
ST.JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC
PARTS
$6.71
SUPERIOR FORD INC
2000 FORD EXPEDTION
$27,393.00
REIMB- HOLSTER
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
SHOP PARTS
$262.49
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$12.54
$37,041.80*
LANG &, RANDY
A -1 BIKE SHOP
ACTION ACCENTS
AG SYSTEMS
ALLIED MECH.SYSTEMS
AMCON BLOCK
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC
ANDERSON, JANET
ANOKA COUNTY COURT ADMINIS
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
B & R GROWERS
SAUCKHAM, MELISSA
BAUERLY BROS INC.
BERNICKS PEPSI COLA
BLUHM, MARGIE
BRANDON TIRE CO
CADD /ENGINEERING SUPPLY
CARR FLOWERS
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CENTRAL LANDSCAPE SUPPLY
CENTURY LABS
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
COAST TO COAST
COBORN ENTERPRISES INC.
CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP
CRIPPS, CLAIR
CROW RIVER PRESS INC
CROW RIVER VET CLINIC
DAKOTA GOURMET
DON HUME
DONALD SITZ CUSTOM FARMING
DUENOW, RUSSELL
ELECTRO WATCHMAN
ERLANDSON, DAVID
STORE FRONT WORK $2,128.00
$2,128.00*
BIKE REPAIRS
$68.65
GUARD SUITS, WHISTLES
$879.25
SPRAYER PARTS
$15.59
LABOR, MATERIALS
$240.70
GARDENWALL UNIT ROCKFACE GRY
$2,692.62
HANDBOOK
$80.62
REFUND - OVERPAYMENT -SWIM PASS
$10.00
TRAT BAIL MONEY - ACKERMANN
$220.00
MAY COMPENSATION
$7,250.00
FLOWERS
$65.10
REFUND SWIM LESSONS
$45.00
REROD - BASEBALL DOUGOUTS
$54.34
POP PURCHASE
$525.62
SR CENTER BLDG SUPV
$50.00
OFF VEHICLE REPAIR
$11.00
COATED BOND PAPER
$60.03
BLOOMING PLANT- TREVOR JOHNSON
$25.51
SLANT FILE
$108.15
HARDWOOD MULCH
$1,006.43
WEED KILLER
$296.25
MAY & JUNE H.A.T.S. CONTRIB
$15,297.76
CREDIT
$4,029.18
COFFEE, TAPE
$51.37
FREIGHT CHARGES - ATHLETIC GOODS
$312.00
COIL CLEAN, PAIL PUMP
$186.68
REFUND- CANCEL DEFENSIVE DRIVE
$8.00
BUSINESS CARDS
$190.49
MAY SERVICE
$211.40
DG GIANTS
$135.00
GLOVE HOLDER, PHONE CASE
$345.00
SER AIRPORT MOWING
$360.00
LEAD INSTRUCTOR -6 CLASSES
$600.00
PLASTIC PIPE & CONNECTORS
$112.69
REIMB- HOLSTER
$112.20
I� �
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 2
GENERAL FUND FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSN OF MN
FORCIER, ANDREW
G & K SERVICES
GALL'S INC
GEHLEN, JEANNINE
GLAESER, CHERYL
GRANIT -BRONZ
GRUFRUFF DESIGN
GRUHLKE, BRAD
GULF STATE DISTRBUTORS
HAGEN, RUTH
HAGER JEWELRY
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP
HCVN -TV
HEMMAH, KATHY
HENSEN, MARK
HILARY, KRISTIN
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
HOESCHENS, DUANE
HUTCH CONVENTION &
HUTCH COOP CENEX
HUTCH FIRE & SAFETY
HUTCH FIRE DEPT GENERAL ACCT
HUTCH MEDICAL CENTER
HUTCH SPORT SHOP
HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE
HUTCHINSON LEADER
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
JACK'S UNIFORMS & EQUIPMENT
JACKSON & GIBBENS
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
JOES SPORT SHOP
JOHNSON, LISA
JUREK, SUE
KIESER, SUE
KLOSS, TOM
KREFT, HOLLY
L & P SUPPLY CO
LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY
LEEWES DISTRIBUTING INC
M & N INTERNATIONAL
MANKATO MOBILE RADIO
MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA
MCLEOD COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT.
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
MCLEOD COUNTY TREASURER
MCLEOD SOCIAL SERVICES
MERRILL, KENNETH B.
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
MID -MN HOT MIX INC
MIKESH, MARCELL
MINI BIFF
MINN BLUE DIGITAL -A
MINNCOMM PAGING
MITCHELL, WILLIAM
MN ELEVATOR INC.
MN REC & PARK ASSC
MN SPORTS FEDERATION
MODERN MAZDA
MORE 4
NO STATES SUPPLY INC
NORTH STAR CHAPTER ICBO
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
OFFICEMAX
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO.
OLSONS LOCKSMITH
PALACIOS, JOSE
PARTIES PLUS
PASTOR DICK GRUBER
PIONEER
PIZZA HUT OF AMERICA INC
QUANTUM LABS
R & T SPECIALTY
MEMBERSHIP DUES
$10.00
REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS
$49.97
UNIFORMS
$1,082.45
UNIFORMS ACCESSORIES
$969.57
REFUND- CANCELLED GOLF LESSONS
$33.00
COMPUTER CLASS
$270.00
POLISHED SEAT
$346.13
BOWLING T- SHIRTS
$235.25
REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS
$60.00
HOLSTER, SHIRTS, POUCH
$84.60
REFUND- CANCELLED SHELTER
$25.00
PLATES
$125.00
POOL CHEMICALS
$1,311.47
FRANCHISE PYMT
$7,195.34
REIMB - BRIDGE CLUB PRIZES
$5.67
REIMB - MILEAGE
$11.38
LEAD INSTRUCTOR -4 CLASSES
$475.00
POWER DOLLY
$533.80
LEAD INST -12 CLASSES, ADMIN
$1,950.00
APRIL LODGING TAX
$4,273.91
CHEMICALS
$203.45
EXTING RECHARGE
$78.28
TUITION REIMB -FIRE SCHOOL
$1,100.00
PHYSICAL, TESTING
$434.00
SHOES
$271.98
CPR ANNIE RENTAL
$1,376.44
LEGAL NOTICES
$1,925.07
JUNE SERVICE
$6,674.60
MAY UTILITY
$5,706.52
LAMP
$13.33
CREDIT RETURNS
$4,042.60
PATROL JACKET
$58.95
75W INCDESANT BULBS
$48.00
SCREENED T- SHIRTS
$522.00
REFUND - CANCELLED SWIMMING
$22.00
LEAD INSTRUCTOR, FR TESTER
$425.00
LEAD INST -3 CLASSES, ADMIN WK
$700.00
REIMB -BLOOD TYPE TESTING
$9.37
REIMB- PARKING CHARGES
$4.25
PLUG, OIL, FILTER
$130.50
PAINT
$564.10
CONCESSION SYRUP
$1,035.00
ALOHA BANNER, LEIS
$28.27
BATTERY
$249.21
BAIL MONEY- ACKERMANN
$300.00
SAND & SALT
$6,672.50
FILING FEES
$28.50
JOINT PLAN -L &P SUPPLY /C.U.P.
$839.00
REFUND - OVERPYMT OF FEES
$146.00
REIMB - PARKING, REGISTRATION
$38.00
MESH NETS
$683.98
41 B WEAR, IN FINES
$440.27
REFUND -SR TOUR
$30.00
UNIT RENTAL- ARMORY & PARK
$87.86
LINEAR FOOT CHARGE
$14.42
JUNE -AUG SERVICE
$54.32
UMPIRE GAMES
$210.00
ELEVATOR SERVICE
$73.65
SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATION
$252.00
TEAM MEMBERSHIPS
$121.00
VEHICLE TOW
$63.92
SUPPLIES
$348.59
JACK STANDS
$131.73
REG -LENNY RUTLEDGE
$65.00
SUPPLIES
$305.74
ENVELOPE WALLET
$20.72
SIGNMASTER JUMBO
$15.10
ALLOY CHAIN W/ CLEVIS
$152.98
MATERIALS, LABOR, SERV CHG
$111.29
REFUND -DANCE PERMIT
$50.00
ANTS
$3.46
GUEST SPEAKER FEE- D.A.R.E.
$100.00
BRITE STRIPE WHITE
$436.65
PIZZA, POP
$31.39
GLOVES
$74.71
DAREN BEANIE BUDDY
$62.98
•
•
•
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
12 -JUN
-2000 (15:57) page 3
____
GENERAL FUND
_- - - - - -_ - -_____
REGION VI CHIEFS ASSC
MEMBERSHIP DUES
___ - - -__
$30.00
-
REINER IRRIGATION & SEPTIC
SERVICE CALL- SPRINKLER HEADS
$45.00
REINER LANDSCAPING
4' FABRIC
$183.18
•
REMUND, GENE
REFUND - CANCELLED SHELTER
$25.00
RIDER BENNETT EGAN & ARUNDEL
PROFESS SERV
$115.50
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
SHOOT HOUSE MATERIALS
$1,393.73
RUTHLEDGE, LENNY
REIMS- MILEAGE
$71.38
SCHMELING OIL CO
DIESEL FUEL
$704.70
SCHMELING, MEGAN
REFUND- CANCELLED SWIM LESSONS
$44.00
SCHROEDER KYLE
WEB PAGE DEVELOPING
$275.00
SEWING BASKET
ALTER UNIFORMS
$178.92
SHARE CORP
PROPDXY, SOLVENT, LUBRIGEL
$389.23
SHOPKO
BATTERIES
$15.92
SHRED -IT
SHREDDING SERVICE
$54.95
SIMONSON LUMBER CO
COMMON NAILS
$3.67
SLABJACKING SPECIALITIES
FILLED CATCH BASIN
$310.00
SR.CENTER ADVISORY BD
REIMB -SR NEWSCASTER POSTAGE
$165.00
STANDARD PRINTING
RUBBER BANDS
$268.12
STARK, THERESA
REFUND -ADV CAMP -CLASS FULL
$25.00
STOTTS, CASEY
LEAD INSTRUCTOR -1 CLASS
$100.00
STURGES, JASON
LEAD INSTRUCTOR -1 CLASS
$100.00
SUBWAY
PORTION PLATTER
$32.80
SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS
COFFEE
$117.00
TELECKY, JOSH
REIMS- SAFETY BOOTS
$60.00
TILTON, DAVID
UMPIRE GAMES
$180.00
TRAF 0 TERIA SYSTEM
CUSTOM PRINTING
$192.39
TREE TRUST
REG FEE -MARK SCHNOBRICH
$25.00
TRI CO WATER COND
WATER
$163.18
TWO WAY COMM INC
CELL PHONE
$664.06
UNITED BLDG CENTERS
DOOR BOTTOM, SILICONE
$214.42
US OFFICE PRODUCTS
CABINET
$8.79
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$1,137.81
US WEST COMMUN
JUNE SERVICE
$166.20
USI INC
CARRIERS
$19.24
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
STAMP, FAX ROLLS
$25.50
VOELKER, KATHIE
CANCELLED- CHEERLEAD, DISCOVERY
$44.00
WAL -MART
CRAFT SUPPLIES
$156.13
•
WARNING LITES OF MN
MN /DOT VEST
$554.42
WASTE MANAGEMENT
JUNE SERVICE
$1,600.61
WISCHNACK, JULIE
REIMB- MILEAGE
$39.00
WRIGHT, LEE
UMPIRE GAMES
$126.00
XEROX CORP
COPIER LEASE
$723.44
<*'
$103,041.34*
HUTCH COMM DEV.0
HUTCHINSON LEADER
PROPERTY SALE
$42.51
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
JUNE SERVICE
$141.82
MCLEOD COUNTY RECORDER
FILING FEES
$78.00
MORE 4
POP, ROLLS
$18.15
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$37.63
< *'
$318.11*
HUTCH TRANS FAC.
CENTRAL MCGOWAN
FACESHIELD
$27.55
COAST TO COAST
KEY, THREAD ROD
$67.52
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$392.19
HUTCH COOP CENEX
FUEL
$10,232.79
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
JUNE SERVICE
$568.09
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
MAY UTILITY
$1,772.18
INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM SERVICE
FUEL CARDS W/ ENCODING
$97.71
JERABEK MACHINE SERV
FLAT & ANGLE CUTS
$8.68
KLEESPIE
SWITCH, LABOR, MILEAGE
$218.24
NELSON CONSTRUCTION CO.
FLOOR PATCHING
$276.56
SNAP ON TOOLS CORP
TOOLS
$158.43
SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS
COFFEE
$78.00
TEK MECHANICAL
LABOR, FREON
$221.68
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$8.36
WITTE SANITATION
MAY SERVICE
$62.86
$14,190.84*
OJRA� FUNDS
MORE 4
SHAPE UP CHALLENGE
$108.56
*'
$108.56*
LIBRARY FUND DS FIRSTAR SANK OF MINNESOTA AGENT FEES $218.38
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL
REPORT
12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 4
< *>
- - -__
_
___________
$218.38*
LIQUOR STORE
AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL
LAUNDRY DELIVERY
$162.55
BELLBOY CORP
MAY MISC
$2,078.55
BERNICKS PEPSI COLA
POP PURCHASE
$580.50
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL ETC
RENEWAL REGISTRATION
$250.00
C & L DISTRIBUTING
MAY BEER
$34,917.39
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
STAMPS
$204.03
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
LIQUOR PAYMENT -TO W/S FUND
$37,540.00
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN
PAYROLL 6/2/00
$8,023.04
CROW RIVER PRESS INC
BUSINESS CARDS
$13.61
DAY DISTRIBUTING
MAY BEER
$1,781.40
ED PHILLIPS & SONS CO.
MAY WINE
$271.40
GLENCOE ENTERPRISE
MAY ADVERTISEMENTS
$225.00
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
MAY MISC
$17,911.92
HANSEN DIST OF SLEEPY EYE
MAY BEER
$2,955.70
HENRYS FOODS INC
TOBACCO PURCHASE
$786.54
HERMEL WHOLESALE
TOBACCO
$150.68
HUTCHINSON LEADER
NEWSPAPER ADS
$1,221.64
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
JUNE SERVICE
$220.70
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
MAY UTILITY
$1,245.93
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
MAY MISC
$2,136.61
K D U Z
MAY RADIO ADS
$149.00
KKLN
RADIO ADS
$560.00
LENNEMAN BEVERAGE DIST. INC
MAY BEER
$6,174.50
LOCHER BROS INC
MAY BEER
$29,395.05
MORE 4
CHEESE, SUPPLIES
$72.66
NORTH STAR ICE
20# ICE
$132.00
PAUSTIS & SONS
MAY WINE
$696.00
PINNACLE DISTRIB
TOBACCO
$398.11
PRO AUTO CLEAN
AUTO CLEAN
$95.00
SLEEPY EYE FLORAL & GREENHOUSE
FLORAL ARRANGEMENT- HANSEN
$31.95
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$616.61
STANDARD PRINTING
CASSETTES
$109.07
TRI CO WATER COND
WATER
$81.48
TWO WAY COMM INC
BATTERY
$47.93
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$119.35
VIKING COCA COLA
POP PURCHASE
$542.80
WASTE MANAGEMENT
APRIL SERVICE
$52.35
WINE COMPANY, THE
MAY WINE
$392.00
< *>
$153,143.05*
PUBLIC SITES
MCLEOD COOP POWER
APRIL ELECTRICAL HOOKUPS
$4,800.00
< *>
$4,800.00*
RURAL F. D.
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MAY FUEL
$48.17
< *>
$48.17*
WATER /SEWER FUND
ALL -MICRO INC
INSTALL SOFTWARE, UPGRADE UNIT
$2,652.68
AM.PAYMENT CENTERS
JUNE -AUG SERVICE
$76.0D
CDI OFFICE PRODUCTS LTD
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$178.92
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
MAY FUEL
$1,042.01
COAST TO COAST
SUPPLIES
$543.17
CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS
FREIGHT CHARGES -PLT GEAR CASE
$599.72
CUSTOM MADE EQUIP
WELDING DRILL
$5.00
CZECH, RANDY
REIMB- RECERTIFICATIONS
$46.00
D.P.C.IND.INC
150# CYL
$275.77
DONOHUE & ASSOC
PROFESS SERV - BOISOLIDS DRYING
$8,461.95
DYNA SYSTEMS
HARDWARE
$672.93
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORMS
$608.48
HANSEN TRUCK SERVICE
PUNCH CLIPS
$26.63
HARRIS COMPANIES
MAY SERVICE MAINT
$1,280.00
HILLYARD FLOOR CARE / HUTCHINSON
FILTER BAGS, ASSURANCE
$38.89
HUTCH COOP CENEX
SUPPLIES
$307.18
HUTCH PLBG & HTG CO
PARTS, LABOR -WWTP
$119.70
HUTCHINSON LEADER
BAG COMPOST
$118.92
HUTCHINSON TEL CO
JUNE SERVICE
$855.74
HUTCHINSON UTILITIES
MAY UTILITY
$23,272.67
•
HUTCHINSON WHOLESALE
BELT
$28.70
INFRATECH
BLUE MARKING FLAGS
$34.49
JEFF'S ELECTRIC
LABOR -WWTF
$40.00
JLR GARAGE DOOR SERVICE
CAPACITAR
$84.81
OPEN -HOLD COUNCIL REPORT
12 -JUN -2000 (15:57) page 5
- - ------
WATER /SEWER FUND
--- - -- --- ---
JUDI, CONTRACTING CO
--- ---- ------- -------
HYDRANT, ROCK, BACKHOE, LABOR
-
$2,483.00
---
K MART
PHONE
$10.64
L & P SUPPLY CO
OIL, FILTER, KNOB
$98.46
LAMPLIGHTER II
CHARGED MEAL
$42.51
LIP ENTERPRISES
REPAIRS TO WELL #6
$9,418.79
MCC INC
BIOSOLIDS DRYING FACILITY
$137,988.00
METTLER TOLEDO INC
LAB PREVENTIVE MAINT
$384.00
MN DEPT OF HEALTH
QTR 2 CONNECTION FEES
$5,070.00
MN VALLEY TESTING LAB
LAB TESTS
$322.75
MPCA
OPTION D REGISTRATION PERMIT
$804.33
NCL
LAB SUPPLIES
$120.93
RICE LAKE CONTRACTING CORP
BIOSOLIDS DRYING ADDITION #1
$221,041.80
ROSENOW, PAUL
REIMB- SAFETY BOOTS
$49.99
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
WRENCH
$33.14
RUTZ PLBG & HTG
1" BLK T -C PIPE
$43.61
SEH
PROFESS SERV -SOUTH TRUNK II
$23,717.69
SPRUCE RIDGE LANDFILL
MAY LOADS
$12,144.87
STANDARD PRINTING
CARDSTOCK
$42.60
STAR TRIBUNE
NEWSPAPER SERVICE THRU 6/2001
$111.80
STRUCTURAL SPECIALTIES
P &H HOIST LABOR
$230.00
SUPERIOR COFFEE & FOODS
COFFEE
$41.60
TRI- COUNTY ELECTRIC MOTOR SERV
BEARINGS, REWND MATRL, LABOR
$1,569.74
TWO WAY COMM INC
BATTERY
$47,93
US FILTER /WATERPRO
METER PARTS
$2,926.13
US POSTAL SERVICE
MAY POSTAGE
$1,115.31
WAL -MART
BATTERY
$38.78
WARNING LITES OF MN
MN /DOT VEST
$161.49
WASTE MANAGEMENT
MAY SERVICE
$31,114.16
WELCOME NEIGHBOR
APRIL LISTING
$60.00
*�
$492,604.41*
$808,473.21*
•
2
IMMEDIATE PAY COUNCIL REPORT 12 -JUN -2000 (16:05) page L
-_ ---------------------------- ------------------------------- --------------------
1-'� _.:2ROV. BDS FIRSTAR BANK OF MINNESOTA PAYING AGENT FEES $268.38
<-> $268.38*
GENERAL FUND
ARNOLD & MCDOWELL
REIMB- WITNESS EXPENSES
$66.00
CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS
SHIPPING ATHLETIC GOODS
$312.00
DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES
DNR FEES TO STATE
$2,527.00
GOV FINANCE OFFICERS ASSC
1999 APPLICATION FEE
$480.00
HIRSHFIELD'S DECORATING CENTER
PAINT
$92.66
HUTCHINSON SENIOR DINING
REFUND MONEY RECEIVED IN ERROR
$29.99
HUTCHINSON, CITY OF
FISH & GAME
$533.50
MCLEOD COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA
BAIL MONEY
$490.00
MEEKER CTNY SHERIFF'S DEPT
CIVIL PROCESS
$20.00
MN ORCHESTRAL ASSOC.
ADAP REC TOUR -30 TICKETS
$1,440.60
MNAPA
REG- J.WISCHNACK
$40.00
MPCA
PERMIT APPLICATION
$240.00
NEW LIFE INDUSTRIES
T- SHIRTS
$236.50
SIBLEY COUNTY COURT ADMINISTRA
BAIL MONEY
$74.80
STATE TREASURER
AIRPORT LICENSE RENEWAL
$15.00
STEARNS COUNTY COURT ADMINISTR
BAIL MONEY
$168.00
STONE, SUSAN
REIMBURSE - WITNESS EXPENSES
$28.70
< *>
$6,794.75`
;IQUOR STORE
CITY OF HUTCHINSON- GENERAL FUN
PAYROLL 5/19/00
$8,538.42
MN DEPT OF REVENUE
MARCH TAX PAYABLE
$19,095.00
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS CO.
LIQUOR PURCHASE
$7,229.75
<`>
$34,863.17*
PAYROLL FUND
AETNA VARIABLE LIFE ASS. CO.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$545.00
AMERICAN FAMILY INS CO.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$27.88
CITY OF HUTCHINSON
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$1,974.16
GREAT WEST LIFE INS. CO.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$100.00
H.R.L.A.P.R.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$213.13
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
EE CONTRIB 5/27
$2,238.46
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE
CHILD SUPPORT
$162.89
PERA LIFE INS CO.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$132.00
PERA- D.C.P.
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$52.02
PRUDENTIAL
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$75.00
PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUNDS
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$30.00
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$17,124.93
TEMPLETON INC
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$270.00
WADELL & REED
EE CONTRIB 6/2
$150.00
< *>
$23,095.47*
SCOP 97 Hsg
Reh EVEN -TEMP CONSTRUCTION
WRAP EXT WINDOW & DOOR TRIM
$2,200.00
< *>
$2,200.00*
WATER /SEWER
FUND ANDERSON,SCOTT
PAINTING & BLASTING SERVICE
$1,310.00
EBERT, RICHARD
RUTTGER'S BAY DEPOSIT
$160.00
GOPHER STATE CONTRACTORS
REFUND PLAN & SPEC FEE
$53.25
GOPHER STATE INC
APRIL CALLS
$86.40
HUTCH COOP CENEX
SUPPLIES
$102.64
MN DEPT OF HEALTH
REG -DICK EBERT
$68.00
RUNNING'S SUPPLY
CHARGER
$330.56
RUTTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE
LODGING- R.EBERT
$617.96
<`>
$2,728.81*
$69,950.58*
i
•
•
Hutchinson Fire Department
Monthly Council Update
May 2000
The fire department responded to 35 calls for service in May, this is the
breakdown of those calls:
City Calls -
Residential 1
Commercial/Industrial 7
Multi - family 6
School Type 3
Rescue 3
Hazardous Material 2
Vehicle I
Grass Type 1
Carbon Monoxide 3
Sky -Warn 1
Rural Calls -
Rescue 2
Farm Buildings 1
Medicals 1
Grass Type 3
Drills/Meetings/Goodwill
SCBA Maintenance
Emergency Driving Certification
Annual Hose Testing
Live Burn with the Dassel Fire Department
Work on the training site
McLeod County Chiefs Meeting
Memorial Day Parade
E
H.F No. 4078, 4th Engrossment
hctp:; /w . revisor. leg. state.mn.us ... dbil1.pl ?bill- H4078.4&session =ls8
77.25 13, is amended to read:
77.26 Subd. 13. Hutchinson Community
77.27 Civic Center ,000,000 C�
77.28 For a grant of up to S1.000.000 to the l J
77.29 city of Hutchinson to design,
77.30 ^---t_.._� ., ac- - --
77.31 and remodel facilities for e community e \
77.32 civic center, subject to the
77.33 requirements of Minnesota Statutes, G y
77.34 section 16A.695. This appropriation is
77.35 not available until the commissioner �Q
77.36 has determined that an equal amount has
77.37 been committed from nonstate sourc
. r 404, section 27, is amended to
77.39 read:
77.40 Sec. 27. [BOND SALE AUTHORIZATIONS.]
77.41 Subdivision 1. [BOND PROCEEDS FUND.] To provide the money
77.42 appropriated in this act from the bond proceeds fund, the
77.43 commissioner of financ -- Fa q uest of the -- i er, shall sell
77.44 and issue bonds of the state in an amount up to $463,795,000 in
77.45 the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect prescribed by
77.46 Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.631 to 16A.675, and by the
77.47 Minnesota Constitution, article XI, sections 4 to 7.
77.48 Subd. 2. [TRANSPORTATION FUND.] To provide the money
77.49 appropriated in this act from the transportation fund, the
78.1 commissioner of finance en - ~ o f _ ^ _c j r e, shall sell
78.2 and issue bonds of the state in an amount up to$34,000,000 in
78.3 the manner, upon the terms, and with the effect prescribed by
78.4 Minnesota Statutes, sections 16A.631 to 16A.675, and by the
78.5 Minnesota Constitution, article XI, sections 4 to 7. The
78.6 proceeds of the bonds, except accrued interest and any premium
78.7 received on the sale of the bonds, must be credited to a bond
78.8 proceeds account in the state transportation fund.
78.9 Sec. 79. Laws 1999, chapter 223, article 1, section 2,
• 78.10 subdivision 2, is amended to read:
78.11 Subd. 2. Business and Community
78.12 Development 38,488,000 28,186,000
78.13 Summary by Fund
78.14 General 25,338,000 15,486,000
78.15 TANF 1,500,000 1,500,000
78.16 Environmental Fund 700,000 700,000
78.17 Workforce
78.18 Development Fund 10,950,000 10,500,000
78.19 $5,017,000 the first year and
78.20 $4,017,000 the second year are for
78.21 Minnesota investment fund grants. Of
78.22 this amount, $1,000,000 in the first
78.23 year is a one -time appropriation and is
78.24 not added to the agency's budget base.
78.25 $400,000 the first year is for a
78.26 one -time grant to Advantage Minnesota,
78.27 Inc. The funds are available only if
78.28 matched on at least a dollar- for - dollar
78.29 basis from other sources. The
78.30 commissioner may release the funds only
78.31 upon:
78.32 (1) certification that matching funds
78.33 from each participating organization
78.34 are available; and
78.35 (2) review and approval by the
78.36 commissioner of the proposed operations
78.37 plan of Advantage Minnesota, Inc. for
78.38 the biennium.
78.39 $14,067,000 the first year and
• 78.40 $14,073,000 the second year are for the
78.41 job skills partnership program. If the
78.42 appropriation for either year is
78.43 insufficient, the appropriation for the
78.44 other year is available. Of this
53 of 59 05/22/2000 11:38 AN
Memorandum
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Brenda Ewiuman Resources Coordinator
RE: Pay Equity Notice of Compliance
DATE: June 5, 2000
i 1 1111;
I am pleased to report that the City of Hutchinson has received from the Minnesota Department
of Employee Relations (DOER) notification of compliance with the Local Government Pay
Equity Act. Information was submitted to DOER in January and was reviewed for compliance.
The compliance letter and certificate received from DOER are herein attached.
We have been notified that our next pay equity report is due January 31, 2003,
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at your convenience.
Enc.
t_
Minnesota
4 Department of
Employee
Relation
Srace of iNtinnesora: Employer of Choice
May 30, 2000
Brenda Ewing
H.R. Coordinator
Hutchinson
111 Hassan Street S.E.
Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522
Dear Ms. Ewing:
Congratulations! I am very pleased to send you the enclosed notification of compliance with
the Local Government Pay Equity Act. Since the law was passed in 1984, jurisdictions
throughout Minnesota have been working diligently to meet the requirements of the act, and I
• commend your hard work and commitment to achieving compliance.
As you know, Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920 specifies the procedure and criteria for
measuring compliance, and information about your situation is enclosed. If you have any
questions about the materials or about pay equity in general, please contact me at
(651) 296 -2653.
One of the things the rule requires is that our department notify each jurisdiction when the
next pay equity report is due. In your case, this date is January 31, 2003, and we will be
sending you forms and instructions at a later time. Also, this notice and results of the
compliance review are public information and must be supplied upon request to any interested
party-
Again, congratulations on your achievement!
Sincerely,
Faith Zwemke
Pay Equity Coordinator
• Attachments
200 Centennial Office Building • 658 Cedar St. • St. Paul, MN 55155 -1603 • (651) 297 -1184 • M (651) 282.2699
An equal opportunity employer
Notice of
Pay Equity Compliance
presented to
City of Hutchinson
for successfully meeting the requirements of the Local Government Pay Equity Act M.S.
471.991 - 471.999 and Minnesota rules Chapter 3920. This notice is a result of an
official review by the Minnesota Department of Employee Relations of your 2000 pay
equity report.
Your cooperation in complying with the local government pay equity requirements is
greatly appreciated.
May 30, 2000
Date
0U
Julien C. Carter
Commissioner
N Gr i 1c),
is,
HUiCHINSON LIGHT TRAFFIC ADVISORY BOARD
Minutes
May 8, 2000
Present: Ed Doring, Rick Larson, Leslie and Lucille Smith, Brian Bonte, and Dave Conrad
Absent: Timm Grages, Archie Woodworth, John Mallak, and Kay Peterson
Staff Present: John Rodeberg, Dolf Moon, Brenda Ewing and Holly Kreft
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Rick Larson at 5:37 p.m.
UPDATE BY BRENDA EWING ON COUNTY -WIDE TRANSIT TRANSITION
Brenda updated the Board of the Transit Transition. She stated that the process was continuing and that the dispatch
was still utilizing space in City Center. She added that some staff was still needed including a couple of dispatchers
and an operations manager. She also stated that there was a toll -free number available and that pick -ups outside of
city limits were starting. She explained that marketing would probably not be done until they were at full staff.
Both Brenda and John stated that MNDOT's long term goal was for a regional transit system. Brenda added that
MNDOT has already recommended software to use that would be consistent throughout the transit systems.
tL REVIEW OF BIKE AND BLADE BONANZA
Dolf stated that 281 participants had registered for the event with an additional forty for the lunch and obstacle course.
He added that there were no waiting lines this year and that the number of volunteer staff seemed to be sufficient. He
did explain that they might consider a two-hour event in the future, instead of the three -hour event. He also added that
they might consider a timeline of 10:15 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. with the drawing at noon.
Dolf stated that there were few complaints listed on the evaluation forms, but did comment that the obstacle course
may not be challenging enough for the 9 and older age group. He added that hopefully next year there would be a law
enforcement officer in the classrooms to present information prior to the event.
He estimated that about 2,800 helmets and 3.200 participants have been part of the event over the last six years. The
Board questioned if something could be done to present the history of the event. Dolf stated that it could be part of
the spring brochure which is sent to over 8.000 households.
r�
Page 2
III. NEW "GUIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BICYCLE FA CILITIE S"
John presented the 1999 guide and added that he did have it available for copying. He stated that it was developed
as a national guide over many years, and it is the first comprehensive. National (AASHTO) manual. He also
added that the Public Works Department would be changing the diamond shape on the paths to a bicycle shape
with an arrow indicating the direction. Discussion was held relative to how and when updates should be given to
the City Council. It was decided to propose a joint meeting be held some time in January.
It was decided that John would provide black and white copies for the Board member, except Dave Conrad who will
have a color copy.
IV. "SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL" INITIATIVE
John updated the Board of the national push for legislation of safe school routes. He added that it was a
large discussion item at the state bicycle conference. The Board questioned where money for such projects
could be obtained. John replied that there could be federal monies available from sources that are
currently recreational oriented. He also added that the City would be applying for a grant for the trail
from Island View Heights to South Grade Road.
V. OTHER ISSUES
John distributed a letter that he drafted to possibly be mailed to commercial property owners, specifically
those along Hwy 15 South, requesting a trail connection. He explained that with the increased use of the
Hwy 15 trail, there was a greater need for connections. He also explained that this letter would be sent
merely as a suggestion at this point. There was discussion as to the wording of the letter. The Board
suggested that the letter be sent on letterhead and envelopes with the Advisory Board logo.
VI. NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be held on October 9 Discussion points will include 2000 project updates and
proposed projects for 2001.
VII. DISCUSSION
Discussion was held regarding the Tartan Park development. Dolf stated that a grant had been recently
applied for, but the status of that grant was not known at this time. Discussion was also held regarding the
Dakota Rail Line Corridor and that the Board would support maintenance of this corridor.
tI t I I: u,.l .rt
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
CI
Memo
TO: Mayor and City Council Members
Frorre Brad Emans, Fire Chief
cc: Gary Plotz, City Administrator
Datm 06/02100
Rio: Need for additional career firefighters
This memo is to inform you of the Hutchinson Fire Department's ongoing recruitment and retention
problem. It will provide you with a clearer understanding of this serious public safety issue, as well as
explain the need for career firefighters in our growing community.
In the not so distant past, the Hutchinson Fire Department had 45 paid, on call firefighters (volunteer)
• on its roster when functioning at full strength. Financial constraints, the struggle to recruit qualified
firefighters and difficulty retaining trained firefighters forced the department to downsize this number to
40. Over the last several months, the department has lost sic firefighters due to job relocation, reducing
the number to 34. This leaves the department operating at 85% of full strength. There is also the real
possibility of losing one more firefighter in the next month.
Looking at the personnel the department has currently, the average years of service is four. Nine
firefighters or 26% of the department have one year of training or less. If the department is able to
recruit enough qualified people to return to full strength, 38% of the department will have one year of
training or less.
One of the problems the department faces when recruiting new firefighters is finding enough people
who have the time to complete all of the training requirements. It takes a minimum of one year to
complete the classroom part of firefighter training. New firefighters are expected to attend 120 hours
(each session is four hours in length) of classroom training at a technical college. In addition, new
firefighters are also required to take 48 hours of First Responder training and 12 hours of Hazardous
Materials training within the first year of service. This training is not cheap. The department covers
only classroom and equipment expenses. It is a waste of department monies to continue training new
people only to have them leave after one or two years of service.
People simply do not have the time to donate like they once did. Jobs, families and recreational
activities consume most people's lives. Furthermore, once a new firefighter finds out what the job is all
about, he or she often quits. Television and the movies have glamorized the job of a firefighter.
Unfortunately, being a firefighter is not all red lights and siren. It requires a lot of training, and it is hot,
dirty work. Work that is often times unappreciated.
E
• Page 1
The Hutchinson Fire Department is not the only fire department dealing with recruitment and retention
problems. In fad, d is a nationwide problem. Marry articles have been written that address this subject
(see attached LMC article). Fire departments across the country are struggling to identify a positive
solution to this seemingly intractable problem.
The Hutchinson Fre Departrnent has taken measures to make sure the shortage in paid, on call
firefighters does not endanger the lives of people who live in this community and the sunn ending area.
The department has implemented an aggressive safety inspection program, as well as a
comprehensive fire prevention program. Nevertheless, these temporary solutions will become less and
less effective as thi$ community grows.
As you are aware, the crty of Hutchinson has been experiencing tremendous growth over the past ten
years and the trend is expected to continue over the next decade. The population growth has
facilitated an increase in the number of calls for service, as well as diversified the types of calls. This in
turn has changed the expectations placed on the department's personnel.
As the community continues to grow to the south and west, the demand for better services and the
need to maintain minimal response times will become critical. The Hutchinson Fire Department has
had no choice but to consider and plan for a small, daytime career department The Hutchinson Fire
Department would like to add one career firefighter in 2001 with fire inspection responsibilities and FMO
(fire motor operator) capabilities. The department would like to add another career fuefghter in 2003
with fire prevention responsibilities.
In closing, the Hutchinson Fire Department appreciates the City Council's willingness to consider its
request for two, additional full-time people. If you have arty questions, please feel free to contact me at
234 -4211.
• Page 2
I
Municipal Fire Response: Time to Reconsider?
By Kirby E. Kiefer
t a recent workshop, Fire Chief
Rick Lasky of Coeur d'Alene,
Idaho, discussed rescuing trapped
firefighters. In light of the recent
firefighter deaths in Massachu-
setts and Iowa, his subject was
especially timely.
At a time when recruitment
and retention of volunteers is a critical
challenge, a serious injury or firefighter
death could mean the end of a volun-
teer fire department. Demographic and
economic factors nationwide are work-
ing against traditional paid -on -call or
"volunteer" fire departments. As fire
chiefs struggle to fill their parr -rime
ranks, one serious incident could chnu-
nate this popular, traditional, and
economical way of providing a vital
public service.
What was apparent in Lasky's pre-
sentation was that in every building
where a firefighter required rescue, the
structure became a total loss. Stopping
the spread of fire became secondary to
I rescuing the downed firefighter. From
a city manager's perspective, we are
confronted with two unacceptable sce-
narios simultaneously: the serious injury
or fine- of-dury death of an employee
and an uncontrolled fire.
If firefighters intend to make rescues
and prevent the brain -death of victims,
they must be on the emergency scene
within four minutes. If they hope to
perform significant property conserva-
tion, they must be performing all the
fire suppression tasks, simultaneously,
before the five - minute point of "flash-
over." In the Twin Cities merro area,
suburban volunteer departments have
trouble assembling six volunteers, espe-
cially during daytime work hours. In
rural areas, the situation may be worse.
Strategies to consider. City managers
are not without options. First, you can
fund and implement aggressive fire pre-
vention programs that target high -risk
populations and behaviors. The Na-
tional Fire Academy has produced fire
protection program management classes
both on campus in Emmitsburg (cost to
the city: $100 /week for meals; travel,
lodging and tuition are subsidized by
the feds) and in weekend classes in
Minnesota. The benefit -to -cost ratio
of prevention programs is high.
Automatic sprinklers, especially in
residential structures, reduce the need
for rescue and suppression activities by
Elie fire department. Supporting a resi-
dential sprinkler ordinance may spark
political resistance from developers, but
sprinklers' contributions to life safety
are _legendary.
Another strategy can be combined
with any other intervention: prepare
to write off any building wi[h an ad-
vanced fire and accept the fallout. For
years, the military considered structures
to be expendable resources not worth
risking firefighters in aggressive interior
fire attacks. While resources for dealing
with aircraft foes were awesome, the
investment in structural firefighting
equipment was meager.
Creative solutions involving auto-
matic mutual aid from neighboring
departments can be arranged. An alb -
ance between St. Louis Park, Hopkins,
and Golden Valley uses career fire-
fighters through the day and volunteers
at night. If the response can be timely,
this can be a great solution. If the entire
team cannot be assembled within about
eight minutes (and certainly within that
24- minute window), however, fire-
fighter rescue and fire confinement
might be impossible.
Before entering into such an agree-
ment, city managers should ask what
will happen when the city's entire day-
time response force (often as few as a
half dozen firefighters) is at an incident
in a neighboring community. Remem-
ber, similarly lean forces from surround-
ing communities are likely to be at the
same incident, so you would be left
with no response to an alarm in your
own town. This situation is statistically
predictable and is an entirely foresee-
able factor for the administrator's risk
management plan.
If local employers are willing to
cooperate, an appeal to their commu-
rriry- mindedness may yield some sort
of emergency work release of their
employees who are also firefighters. In
the past, it was quite common for busi-
nesses to allow non - essential employees
to leave work to assist with an emer-
gency. With today's right labor market,
employers may be reluctant to enter
into such an agreement, but it is an
option worth investigating.
When all other options have been
exhausted, and an adequate team of
volunteers still cannot be assembled,
force augmentation with career fire-
fighters may become necessary. Costs
could be controlled by creating a joint
powers fire protection district to fund a
small number of daytime career fighters
who respond into any of several ad-
joining jurisdictions. Local volunteers
could fill our the required assignment
and the neighboring communities
could provide coverage for a second
incident.
Demographic changes are impacting
the volunteer fire service nationwide.
City managers have several options for
fulfilling their responsibilities for mu-
nicipal fire protection. Maintaining the
status quo is probably no longer one of
those options. r
Kirby E. Kiefer is a specialist at the Minne-
sota State Colleges & Universities' FIRE/
ENIS /Safety Center and a member of the
International City/County Management
Association. He has been afire service
administrator since 1977.
MAY/JUNE 2000 MINNESOTA CITIES 17
CITY OF RUTCHINSON
LIQUOR STORE COMPARISON
TOTAL 75,809
99 TOTAL. 70,568
AOF SALE 28
SALES INC OR DEC
153,233 26,251 11,159
145,973 23,678 12,750
59 10 4
13,463
5 \
2,400
266,452
252,969
100
H UTCHINSONZ etfrr*r, I
IQUOR ORE COMPARISON J
MAY 200
LIQUOR BEER NINE MISC.
---- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - ----- -------
1 1,781 3,213 536
2 1,498 3,582 713 231
3 1,681 3,967 648 271
4 2,242 5,308 871 270
5 4,223 11,004 1,522 655
6 4,306 10,843 2,004 797
8 2,229 3,054 597 222
9 1,807 2,890 658 196
10 2,452 3, B19 650 134
11 2,990 5,561 1,022 300
12 4,865 11,011 1,804 704
13 4,403 9,011 2,411 506
15 1,626 2,864 418 278
16 1,848 2,565 379 213
17 1,993 3,945 668 179
18 2,802 4,728 1,050 216
19 5,229 12,698 2,315 756
20 3,845 9,616 1,491 766
22 1,709 4,000 705 194
23 1,928 3,186 492 206
24 2,805 4,979 918 271
25 3,974 9,887 1,539 421
26 6,620 14,711 2,364 818
27 6,053 13,911 2,635 770
29 HOLIDAY
30 2,052 3.423 700 185
31 2,414 1,414 710 277
TOTAL 79,435 166,189 29,818 9,978
99 TOTAL 75,809 153,233 26,251 11,159
\OF SALE 28 58 10 3
SALES INC OR DEC 18,968
1
tp ,
TOTAL
TOTAL BY KEEN
____ __________
5, 672
6,024
6,567
8,691
17,404
17,950
62, 308
6,102
5,551
7,054
9,873
18,384
15,331
62,295
5,186
5,005
6,785
8,796
20,998
15, 71B
62,488
6,608
5,802
8,973
15,621
24,513
23,169
85,086
0
6,360
6,083
13,243
285,420
266,452
100
• i �
May -99
_________ __________
_________
_________
_________ __________
TOTAL
LIQUOR
BEER
WINE
_________
MISC.
TOTAL
__________
BY MEEK
__________
1
___________________
4,547
_________
10,982
2,045
826
18,400
18,400
3
2,083
3,279
359
208
5,929
4
1,791
2,743
502
149
5,185
5
1,910
3,036
824
172
5,942
6
2,550
3,749
1,025
208
7,532
7
4,291
7,556
1,500
594
13,941
B
3,661
7,450
1,950
526
13,587
52,116
10
1,580
5,238
661
391
7,670
11
1,440
2,395
544
221
4,600
12
2,084
2,737
507
165
5,493
13
2,434
4,797
714
263
8,208
14
4,759
10,617
1,652
677
17,705
15
3,556
7,612
1,362
675
13,205
57,081
17
2,089
3,016
451
166
5,722
18
1,951
3,329
402
216
5
19
2,035
3,373
623
281
6,312
20
2,508
4,469
896
217
8,090
21
4,735
9,771
1,634
796
16,936
22
3,746
7,650
1,158
708
13,264
56,222
24
2,160
3,215
486
137
5,998
25
1,709
3,313
558
214
5,794
26
1,975
5,313
708
294
8,290
27
3,948
7,326
1,455
494
13,273
28
5,917
14,443
5,644
854
23,058
29
5,552
14,435
2,262
1,571
23,820
80,233
31
746
1,389
129
136
2,400
TOTAL 75,809
99 TOTAL. 70,568
AOF SALE 28
SALES INC OR DEC
153,233 26,251 11,159
145,973 23,678 12,750
59 10 4
13,463
5 \
2,400
266,452
252,969
100
H UTCHINSONZ etfrr*r, I
IQUOR ORE COMPARISON J
MAY 200
LIQUOR BEER NINE MISC.
---- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - ----- -------
1 1,781 3,213 536
2 1,498 3,582 713 231
3 1,681 3,967 648 271
4 2,242 5,308 871 270
5 4,223 11,004 1,522 655
6 4,306 10,843 2,004 797
8 2,229 3,054 597 222
9 1,807 2,890 658 196
10 2,452 3, B19 650 134
11 2,990 5,561 1,022 300
12 4,865 11,011 1,804 704
13 4,403 9,011 2,411 506
15 1,626 2,864 418 278
16 1,848 2,565 379 213
17 1,993 3,945 668 179
18 2,802 4,728 1,050 216
19 5,229 12,698 2,315 756
20 3,845 9,616 1,491 766
22 1,709 4,000 705 194
23 1,928 3,186 492 206
24 2,805 4,979 918 271
25 3,974 9,887 1,539 421
26 6,620 14,711 2,364 818
27 6,053 13,911 2,635 770
29 HOLIDAY
30 2,052 3.423 700 185
31 2,414 1,414 710 277
TOTAL 79,435 166,189 29,818 9,978
99 TOTAL 75,809 153,233 26,251 11,159
\OF SALE 28 58 10 3
SALES INC OR DEC 18,968
1
tp ,
TOTAL
TOTAL BY KEEN
____ __________
5, 672
6,024
6,567
8,691
17,404
17,950
62, 308
6,102
5,551
7,054
9,873
18,384
15,331
62,295
5,186
5,005
6,785
8,796
20,998
15, 71B
62,488
6,608
5,802
8,973
15,621
24,513
23,169
85,086
0
6,360
6,083
13,243
285,420
266,452
100
• i �
0 •
is &7PU
7:77 PM
Final
(A) (B) (A)-(B)
APRIL MARCH APRIL Charlpa
2000 2000 1988 CY vs PY
$622,750 $564.644 $341,215 281,535
1,681.441 1,530483 - 1,114454 669,980
762,682 911,376 853,336 (90,651)
592,843
486,165
417,282
115.561
I IU I GIIINSON AREA IIEALTII CARE
1068,857
1,024,036
81,230
165,832
COnparatrve Baanca §Imm
255,188
(x6.358)
452.402
497.614
304.041
As of Aprl 30. 1999,)
U •
103.087
67.008
(A)
68.741
(B)
(A) (B)
20.330
(5.167)
(5,167)
APRIL
MARCII
APRIL
Charge
2000
2000
1999
CY vs PY
LIABILITIES AND FI INn _ an ANCES
Sdule!il9ii!!!
Curren LWWin
1
Cash and mveslmuls Operations
$4,121,274
$4.411.969
S3,070.605
1.042.469
Cu rem malureles of
2
I:asb And aweslinGtls Selllimmed
4/1.659
496.629
426.182
50877
Laglear debt
3
SuL401al cash 8 hlxee6nente
$4,598,933
$1,808,598
$3.505,5117
1.093.346
Accanls payable - trade
EsWralad canhaaual
4
PahenUResdani receivables
12.811,518
11,664,765
11,151.150
1660.428
selltamerds -real
5
Allowances for bad debts
(2,708,379)
(2643,713)
(3,042.991)
334,612
Accrued expenses -
6
Advances OW cmlratlral sll wan es
(2,334 6151
(1.797,775)
(767,121)
Selarles
7
Nab Pahm hesidenl and Ilwd party
— 12,564,696)
PTO
5
parrot recewabes
$1.538.303
$6,606437
$6,310,384
1,227,919
h4wasl
9
Sal Inured peOW wru
10
011w. wcmvdbtus cal
210,852
263,625
59.556
121,096
UN Cara tax payable
I1
Invemo,,ea
643,986
644,600
603,597
40,369
Delarred lablines
12
Peeped expenses
132,572
120,649
90,042
52,530
Deterred revenue
13
Tolal Current Assets
$13,124,446
$12,623,909
$10,589.166
2.535,280
Total CuneM Lwblltes
14
BOard DeamWedrFuntled Veo:ecialroc Invagilments
$6,099,044
$6,247,721
$7.930,046
(1,831,002)
15
Investment m Joint Vadwes
$77,385
$77,385
$83,160
(5.775)
PM II A$$91!
16
Land
3165,696
$165.696
$165,696
0
17
Bungs
23,427,042
23,401,398
18,627,072
4,799,970
18
Aculmulated deprecralion
(8,724 760)
(B 645 965)
(7,935.1221
(789836)
Low term Debt (less current
19
Buildings less depreciahan
$14,702,282
$14.761,433
$10,691,950
4.010.332
rrahrliesl
20
Egmpnard
12 605,176
12,565.321
12,110.466
494, 112
21
Mmuen4mod dopac,.duwe
(8646.487)
(8,553,957 )
(0 454009)
(1 91,678)
22
Equymeem less delxeaelxxe
$3,856,691
$4,011.38.1
$3,655,857
302,834
23
Cahn cunslnxaxxl 6 ee„xlxieernt
0
0
0
0
24
Conalwcliae in prOWess
40,756
40,757
2,460,568
(2 419 812)
25
Total Plane Assets
118.667,425
$18,979,250
$16,974,071
1,893,354
Fund Balance
01 f Sam
26
Deferred&anciig costs
$108.084
$107085
$120608
(11524)
27
Total Funds
$36,274,384
$
$35,697,051
2,577,333
Total Funds
is &7PU
7:77 PM
Final
(A) (B) (A)-(B)
APRIL MARCH APRIL Charlpa
2000 2000 1988 CY vs PY
$622,750 $564.644 $341,215 281,535
1,681.441 1,530483 - 1,114454 669,980
762,682 911,376 853,336 (90,651)
592,843
486,165
417,282
115.561
1.105.266
1068,857
1,024,036
81,230
165,832
99.925
255,188
(x6.358)
452.402
497.614
304.041
148,361
96.033
103.087
67.008
29.025
68.741
65,530
48.411
20.330
(5.167)
(5,167)
(4,931)
4236)
$5,548,826 $5,322,614 $4.450,040 1,066,786
$14,609.885 $14,810,922 $14,762,008 (152123)
$18,117,673 $17901814 $16455003 1,862,870
$ 36, 2 74,36 1 $36,035,360 $35.887,061 2,577,733
Fm17nl
Pam I Arson
• 1: PM
PM
F9d
I IUl CIIINSON AREA HEAL TI I CARE
Cwnparatuve Balance"
As of April 30. )999, u . •
Frn9m1
Pam I arson
(A)
A
(A) (0)
(A)
(B)
(A) -(B)
APRIL
MARCII
APRX
Change
APRIL
MARCH
APRIL
Charge
2000
2000
1999
CY are PY
2000
2000
1999
CY ve PY
ASSE
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
_SWiF!0 Aiseli
CllrreM LlahfYes
1
Cash end meshoeols Operallors
$4,121,274
54.411.969
53.078,805
1,042.469
Curets meprllles of
2
Cesh mxl rrveseuelrs Fell ensued
_ 4 11,659
496.629
426.782
50,8
Lung helm debt
1622,750
1564,644
1341,215
281,536
J
Su1MWal cash 8 inveshaerds
54.598,933
14,908.598
$3.505,587
1,093,346
Accords payable - bade
1,884 .444
1,530,483
1,114,454
569.980
Estimated conhadral
4
Paeenl/Resudenll iecervables
12.811,578
11,664,765
11.151,150
1660.428
sollema8s -nel
762.882
911,376
853.336
(90.654)
5
Allowances for bad debts
(2,708.379)
(2.643,713)
(3.042,991)
334,612
Acauedaxpsrues-
6
Advances and conhadual allowances
(2,584,a86)
(2.334 615)
(1
(767
Salaried
592,843
466,165
477,282
115.561
7
Nei pall"ies: dent and Osid party
PTO
1,105,266
1 088,857
1,024,038
81,230
a
pays lecavables
$1.538.303
16686.437
$6,310,384
1,227,919
allerast
165,832
99,925
255,1118
(80,356)
9
SOB I aursd pog wile
452,402
407,614
304,041
148,381
10
Ouw, iewrvWaes lane
210,652
263.625
89.556
121,096
MN Cara lax payable
96,033
103,087
67,005
29,025
11
Inverrorues
643,9N
644,800
603,597
40,389
Delerred fi kwidies
68,741
65,530
48.411
20,330
12
Prepaid expenses
132,572
120,649
80042
52
Deterred revoraie
(5,167)
(5,167)
(4,931)
(236)
13
Taal Currerui Assets
_ $13
$12,623,909
$10,589
2
To1W Ciarenl Liab"ied
- 0,546,826
$5,322,514
$4,450,040
1,066,786
14
Board Ues:= aleeNFurirdwl L 'Wec.al_ L^vesL
16,099,044
$6,247,721
$7 , 930 , 0146
(1, 831 , 002)
15
Inveslmarr in JQHA yntlues
$77,385
$77
$83.160
(5
. -MW As
16
Land
$165,696
$165,696
$165.696
0
17
Buddugs
23,427,042
23,407,395
18,627,072
4,799,970
18
Acnmulated de "whon
(8,724,760)
(8
(7
(789
Lone -term Debt (leas curenl
Is
BmMlirgs less depre alarr
$14,702,202
$14,761,433
110.691,950
4,010,332
mallribaral
$14,609,sa5
$14,810,922
$14,762,008
(152123)
20
Lqugxland
12,605,178
12.565,321
12,110.466
494,112
21
Accmni4alad rWlx.n:�.nlxm
_ (8,640,467)
(5. 553,951 )
(9, 454,609)
/5)
22
EqugxneW leas depinaalxxl
$3,858.691
- -- $4011,361
$3655,857
_1191,6
302,834
23
Case cursluxaxrr 8 etpx(vnand
0
0
0
0
24
Colswwlxn in prugiess
40,166
40
2
(2 418 91
25
loat Plenl Assels
_ $18,867,425
$18.978250
$16974071
1
Fund Be
$18.117,673
$17901914
$16455003
1.662,670
Oft 951m
26
Delened financing costs
$105,084
$107,085
$120606
(14524)
27
Trial FLmds
$38.274,384
$38,035,350
$35,697,051
2,57
Trial Funds
_ X38,
$
$ 35,89 7, 05 1
2.5
Frn9m1
Pam I arson