The URL can be used to link to this page

cp10-10-2000 cA A � OCTOBER SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY 2000 -8- -9- -10- COLUMBUS DAY HUTCHINSON Offices OPEN All City 7 :00 a.m. — Leadership Team CITY Meeting in City Center Main CALENDAR Conference Room 1:30 p.m. — Management Team at City Center Main Conference Room 9:00 a.m. —All -Day Budget Workshop at EOC/Training Center 5:00 p.m. — Charter Commission at City WEEK OF Center Staff Conference Room 5:30 p.m. — City Council Meeting in Council Chambers October 8-14 5:30 p.m. —Light Traffic Advisory Board Meeting at City Center Main Conf. Room WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY -11- -12- -13- -14- CONFERENCE /SEMINAR/ T AiN1NG/VACATION 9 -23 Marilyn Hed (V) C - Conference M = Meeting S = Seminar T = Training V = Vacation W = Workshop 0 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10. 2000 INVOCATION — Pastor Jim Devorak, St. Anastasia Catholic Church PRESENTATION OF APPRECIATION GIFT TO FORMER CITY COUNCIL MEMBER JEFF HAAG 3. MINUTES — Regular Meeting of September 26, 2000 Action - Motion to approve as presented 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 2. TREE BOARD MINUTES OF AUGUST 28, 2000 3. BUILDING REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 2000 C� 4. AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 28, 2000 AND SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 - (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -285 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.01 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE DELETING E.1306 SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (SECOND READING AND ADOPT) 2. RESOLUTION NO. 11583 — RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SOUTH GRADE TRAIL RESOLUTION NO. 11585 — RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LOCATION OF POLLING PLACE FOR ALL PRECINCTS AND APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE 2000 FEDERAL GENERAL ELECTION AND SPECIAL CITY ELECTION 4. RESOLUTION NO. 11596 — RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GRANT AGREEMENT WITH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 5. RESOLUTION NO. 11597 — RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE FOR THE 2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2001 6. RESOLUTION NO. 11598 — RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 16-22,2000 AS MINNESOTA MANUFACTURERS WEEK 7. RESOLUTION NO. 11584 — RESOLUTION CERTIFYING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON TO THE COUNTY OF MCLEOD (c) DANCE PERMIT FOR JOSE A. PALACIOS ON NOVEMBER I 1 & 25, 2000 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -OCTOBER 10, 2000 a a (d) TRANSIENT MERCHANT PERMIT FOR T.A.P. ENTERPRISES INC. ON NOVEMBER 1, 2000 (e) APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS /COMMISSIONS: � AIRPORT COMMISSION - CHARLES "CHUCK" BRILL (FIRST TERM) ➢ PARKS,/RECREATION/ COMMUNITY EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD TODD ERTSGAARD (SECOND TERM) DEBBIE KOGLIN (SECOND TERM) BRUCE PETERSON (FIRST TERM) (f) APPROVAL OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LOAN TO ALLIED MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Action - Motion to approve consent agenda PURL IC HEA_RINC. -NONE COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS (a) UPDATE ON BID OPENING RESULTS FOR FIRE TRUCKS BY FIRE CHIEF EM ANS • Y Action - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) DISCUSSION OF ANNEXATION AREA NEAR HWY. 7 EAST AND HWY. 22 Action - (b) CO MMUNITY E OIr VIDEO NETWORK, INC. (HCVN) TOTA CO INSTALL AN ANTENNA ASSEMBLY ON CITY CENTER ROOF Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve and enter into agreement NEW BUSINESS (a) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACTS WITH EARTH TECH FOR: (1) CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES FOR SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER; PHASE I (LETTING NO. 1, PROJECT NO. 1) (2) WATER TREATMENT PLANT DESIGN REPORT AND WELL HEAD PROTECTION PLANNING Action - Motion to reject - Motion to approve contracts • 2' • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA - OCTOBER 10. 2000 (b) CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS FOR: (1) MENARD ADDITION (2) SUMMERSET ADDITION (3) BEAU RIDGE SUBDIVISION Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions (c) DISCUSSION OF TH 7 CENTRAL PROJECT STATUS Action - (d) CONSIDERATION OF REVISED ASSESSMENT ROLLS (1) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5037; LETTING NO. 4, PROJECT NO. 00 -05 & 00 -06 RESOLUTION NO. 11586 — REVISED RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 11587 — RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT. LETTING NO. 4 (2) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039; LETTING NO. 6 • > RESOLUTION NO. 11588 —REVISED RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 6 ➢ RESOLUTIO NO LI5W — RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT. LETTING NO. 6 (3) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5046; LETTING NO.9 > RESOLUTION NO. 11590 — RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 9 > RESOLUTION NO, 11591 — RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 9 > RESOLUTION NO. 11592 — RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 9 (4) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5045, LETTING NO. 11 > RESOLUTION NO. 11593 - RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 11 > RESOLUTION NO. 11594 — RESOLUTION WANING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 11 RESOLUTION NO. 11595 — RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT, LETTING NO. 11 (e) CONSIDERATION OF OFFERING 850 DISCOUNT FOR COLUMBARIUM NICHES TO PARTICIPANTS IN UPCOMING INFORMATIONAL SEMINAR FOR CREMATION AND CREMATION - RELATED SERVICES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve CITY COUNCIL AGENDA —OCTOBER 10, 2000 (f) CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE TO PURCHASE ANESTHESIA MACHINES Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve (g) CONSIDERATION OF AWARDING BIDS FOR SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION YEAR 2000 BONDS 1. GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY PUBLIC UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000A (54,000,000) 2. GENERAL OBLIGATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000B (52,800,000) 3. GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2000C ($2,425,000) Action — Motion to reject — Motion to approve and adopt Resolutions 9. MISCELLANEOUS (a) COMMUNICATIONS 10. CLAIMS APPROPRIATIONS AND CONTRACT PAYMENTS (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Action — Motion to approve and authorize payment from appropriate funds 1 • 1:♦ 4 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26. 2000 1. Mayor Torgerson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. with the following members present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson. Council Members Jim Haugen. John Mlinar, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering John Rodeberg and City Attorney Marc A. Sebora. 2. Pastor Jim Hakes gave the invocation. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES TO HONORED GUESTS G. Barry Anderson, President of the HCVN Board, presented Sue Potter with a plaque in appreciation for her service during the past 15 years as Director of the Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. (HCVN). He wished her well in retirement. The Mayor presented former Council Members William Craig and Don Erickson with a shadow box in appreciation of the time they served on the Hutchinson City Council. _. MINUTES The minutes of the regular meeting of September 11. 2000, special meetings of September 14, 2000 and September 18, 2000 and bid opening of September 19, 2000 were approved as presented. • 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 1. HUTCHINSON AREA HEALTH CARE MINUTES OF AUGUST 15, 2000 2. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF AUGUST 15, 2000 (b) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 1. ORDINANCE NO. 00 -285 — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.01 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE DELETING E.1306 SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (WAIVE FIRST READING AND SET SECOND READING) (c) OUT OF STATE TRAVEL REQUEST FOR POLICE CHIEF TO ATTEND SEMINAR IN APPLETON, WISCONSIN (d) SHORT -TERM GAMBLING LICENSE FOR VFW AUXILIARY (e) PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO REMODEL EXISTING CEDAR CREST FACILITY LOCATED AT 225 SHADY RIDGE ROAD REQUESTED BY HENRY AND ROSALIND EWALD WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11577) • 2. FINAL PLAT FOR 4 -LOT SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS MENARD ADDITION REQUESTED BY MENARD INC. WITH FAVORABLE N CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 0 RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11578) 3. FINAL PLAT FOR 21 -LOT SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS SUMMERSET ADDITION REQUESTED BY DEVELOPERS RESOURCE CO. WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11579) 4. FINAL PLAT FOR 13 -LOT SUBDIVISION KNOWN AS BEAU RIDGE REQUESTED BY JEFF MUNSELL WITH FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11580) Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the consent agenda. Motion unanimously carried. PUBLIC HEARING — 6:00 P.M. (a) LETTING NO. 2, PROJECT NO. 00 -02; ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5043 The Mayor called the public hearing to order at 6:00 p.m. Rodeberg stated the hearing was for the second phase of the south area trunk sewer on Jefferson Street SE to the west of TH 15, Project No. 00 -02. He then reviewed the area involved and stated the total amount of the proposed assessment was $134,787.88. The City Engineer noted that the sanitary sewer was the major cost of the project. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to close the hearing at 6:10 p.m. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Hoversten, second by Mlinar to approve the project and assessment roll and to adopt Resolution No. 11582. Motion unanimously carried. 6. COMMUNICATIONS, REQUESTS AND PETITIONS - NONE 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (a) ONDS ((DEFERRED SEPTEMBER F GENERAL OBLIGATION YEAR 2000 (1) G E 00 (OBLIGATESOLUTIMPROVEMENT 7 BONDS, SERIES 2000C, (2) GENERAL OBLIGATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000B, $2,800,000 (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 11574) (3) BONDS, SERIES 2000A, $4,000,000 (ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.1 5 5) • Mr. Steve Apfelbacher, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. reviewed the three general obligation bonds being sold. The bond consultant stated that the interest rate was 0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 26. 2000 5% lower than four months ago. On October 10, 2000, Ehlers will receive the bids on the bonds, with a closing in October. A felbacher reported that the Series 2000A Bonds were being issued for the purpose of providing temporary financing for the construction of electric power lines and a substation in McLeod County for the City's electric system in anticipation of the issuance of long term debt. He stated that since the Series 2000B Bonds are general obligation, they would be paid from net revenues of the waterworks plant and system, sewage treatment plant, and sanitary sewer system. The bonds were being issued for the purpose of financing the construction of various improvements to the City's wastewater treatment plant. The bond consultant commented that the Series 2000C Bonds were being issued for the purpose of financing various public improvements within the City. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve the sale of bonds and to adopt Resolutions No. 11573, No. 11574 and No. 11575. Motion unanimously carried. 0 (a) CONSIDERATION OF ENTERING INTO ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT WITH MCLEOD COUNTY Plotz stated the cost of the County assessment service had increased due to a higher cost of living and an increase in the number of parcels to be assessed. He recommended approval of the agreement for 5,108 parcels at $7.00 per parcel. Motion by Hoversten, second by Peterson to approve the assessment agreement in the amount of $35,756. Motion unanimously carried. (b) CONSIDERATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND WADE AND TAMARA ROLF FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO REPLANT FOUR TREES Rodeberg reported that the property at 1440 Jefferson Street South was sold to Mr. and Mrs. Wade Rolf after the easement documents for the Edmonton Avenue sewer project had been negotiated with the previous owner. The Wades failed to recognize the fact that they would lose some mature trees and part of their hedge as a result of the City project. The City Engineer stated that in order to keep the project on schedule, City Attorney Richard J. Schieffer negotiated an agreement that provided Mr. and Mrs. Rolf with partial reimbursement for the loss of the trees. Rodeberg recommended that the City Council approve the proposed agreement. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Wade Rolf in the amount of $1,600. Motion unanimously carried. (c) CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTING CONTRACT WITH SRF CONSULTING FOR DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ISSUES Rodeberg requested that SRF Consulting be approved to conduct a Hutchinson downtown traffic study. He stated that the major issues pertained to left -turn lanes and the Second Avenue S. intersection. The City Engineer noted the total cost for • services on this project was estimated at $9,600, and the consulting company would not exceed that figure without City Council authorization. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 0 Motion by Mlinar, second by Hoversten to approve the contract with SRF Consulting. Motion unanimously carried. (d) CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDERS NO. 2 & NO. 3 FOR BIOSOLIDS DRYING ADDITION PROJECT Engineer Edward S. Nevers, Donohue & Associates, reported on the biosolids drying addition project. He presented the following two change orders for City Council approval. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2: Nevers explained that the existing electrical system is not of sufficient size, capacity, and configuration to provide electrical service to both the existing Solids Handling Building and the new Biosolids Drying Addition. The proposed changes under Change Order No. 2 are necessary to convert and expand the existing service to provide ample capacity and capability to operate all the systems within the building complex. A change order addition of $48,805 would be required to implement the change. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve change order No. 2. Motion unanimously carried. CHANGE ORDER NO. 3: Nevers reported the State electrical inspector determined the electrical service to the Solids Handling Building complex should be provided • by only one incoming service. Therefore, the existing electrical service is being revised and upgraded to operate all the systems within the building complex. The y change order will amount to a 55,135.81 addition to the contract. Motion by Peterson, second by Mlinar to approve change order No. 3. Motion unanimously carried. (e) CONSIDERATION OF SELLING 1988 PIERCE ARROW FIRE TRUCK Fire Chief Brad Emans informed the City Council that the Fire Department had begun the process for selling the 1988 Pierce Arrow fire truck. The bids will be accepted until 6:30 p.m. on January 8, 2001, and the bids will be opened at 7:00 p.m. at the Fire Station. Emans stated the revenue generated from the sale of the fire truck would be applied to the purchase of the new telescoping platform truck. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve advertising for bids on the 1988 fire truck. Motion unanimously carried. (f) MINNESOTA FOR RvIPLEMENTA STATE OF TION OF 2000 ENERGY CODE The Director of Planning/Zoning/Building requested authorization for the City to participate in the 2000 Energy Code grant process. A proposed grant application and resolution were presented to the City Council for consideration. Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the grant application and to adopt Resolution No. 11576. Motion unanimously carried. 9. MISCE , .ANEOUS M • CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 (a) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Rodeberg reported that bids were opened on September 19, 2000 for Project No. 00- 01, Letting No. 01 for the South Area Trunk Sewer, Phase I — WWTF to Jefferson Street SE. He recommended awarding the bid to the low bidder, R. L. Larson Excavating Inc., in the amount of S1,397,665. It was noted that work on the project would begin in two weeks. Motion by Haugen, second by Hoversten to approve the project, award the bid to R.L. Larson Excavating Inc. and to adopt Resolution No. 11581. Motion unanimously carried. (b) COMMUNICATIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBER KAY PETERSON Peterson stated there was an opening on the Library Board. She recommended to appoint Kay Johnson to fill the vacancy. Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to appoint Kay Johnson to the Library Board. Motion unanimously carried. {c) COMMUNICATIONS FROM DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING Rodeberg commented on a meeting with MN/DOT that was held today. Topics discussed included a pre- design, environmental issues, reconstruction of the Main Street bridge, and detour issues. The proposed bridge project would be done over a two -year period in two phases. Also, MN/DOT considered a service road to be extended past the Best Western Victorian Inn. (d) COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR MARLIN TORGERSON The Mayor read a letter from Representative Bob Ness in which he expressed appreciation for the plaque he recently received from the City of Hutchinson. Ness also expressed thanks for the support given to him from the City staff and City Council. (e) COMMUNICATIONS FROM CITY ATTORNEY RICHARD SCHIEFFER The City Attorney commented on a recent meeting held regarding Hwy. 7. He noted some of the problems had been worked out, and the Township Attorney will be taking certain issues back to the Township Board. The City and Township will try • to reach an agreement. Schieffer stated part of the problem was that the east property owners wanted annexation, while the west property owners did not want to be CITY COUNCIL MINUTES — SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 0 annexed. It was suggested to extend the sanitary sewer to the property owners on the east end in the near future since the Township did not want to approve the property located to the west for seven years. The City Attorney commented that the Township Agreement would expire by then, and it would be difficult to plan a sanitary sewer project without all the property owners involved. (a) VERIFIED CLAIMS A & B Motion by Mlinar, second by Peterson to approve the verified claims A and authorize payment from appropriate funds. Motion unanimously carried. Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to approve the verified claims B and authorize payment from appropriate funds. ?Motion carried with Hoversten abstaining from voting. CLOSED MEETING TO DISCUSS LITIGATION Motion by Peterson, second by Haugen to close the regular City Council meeting at 6:15 p.m. for a closecVtneeting to discuss litigation. Motion unanimously carried. The regular City Council meeting was called back to order at 6:27 p.m. Motion was made by Peterson, seconded by Hoversten to adjourn the meeting. Motion unanimously carried. 2 • MINUTES OF CLOSED MEETING HUTCHINSON CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 Present: Mayor Marlin Torgerson, Council Members Jim Haugen, John Mlinar, Kay Peterson and Duane Hoversten. Also present: City Administrator Gary D. Plotz, Director of Engineering John Rodeberg, City Attorney Marc A. Sebora, and Administrative Secretary Marilyn J. Swanson. The Mayor called to order the closed meeting at 6:15 p.m. Rodeberg reported the closed meeting pertained to litigation with Kuechle Underground regarding Letting No. IO/Project No. 97 -28 for the Island View Heights Second Addition. Kuechle started litigation in 1999 stating a damage amount of $41,000, and the figure escalated to over $170,000 in the most recent filing. The first amount did not include items that the City had already agreed they owed. The second number included all costs, of which many were fabricated. The City Engineer reported that the litigation process was begun earlier this year, but the City and contractor could not agree on the payment owed. Therefore, the City's attorneys (Paul Reuvers of Erstad & Reimer and Mark Rossow of LMC) held a mitigation conference with the City and Kuechle Underground on September 1, 2000 at the offices of Moore, Costello & Hart. The outcome of the mitigation was an agreement for the City to make a final payment to Kuechle in the amount of $56,000 for all monies due, subject to City Council approval. The mitigation fees would be split 50150 between the two parties involved. Rodeberg commented that Attorney Rossow of LMC (Berkley Risk) had noted LMC would probably provide approximately $10,000 toward the settlement cost. Sebora stated this was the first lawsuit in which he had been involved where the party pays more than the original cost. He commented that the League of Minnesota Cities should have been involved sooner before the mitigation was set up one year ago. The City Attorney was satisfied that the LMC would pay toward the settlement costs. Sebora also informed the City Council that Rodeberg had documented everything that pertained to the litigation in letters and reports. Rodeberg recommended that the City Council approve the $56,000 final payment and authorize finalizing the contract with Mr. Kuechle, based on the agreement provided. Motion by Mlinar, second by Haugen to approve the final payment and authorize finalizing the contract with Kuechle. Motion unanimously carried. is Motion by Peterson, second by Hoversten to re -open the regular City Council meeting at 6:27 p.m. Motion unanimously carried. W Hutchinson Public Library Board Meeting Monday, September 25, 2000 Members Present: Connie Lambert, Mary Henke, Larry Ladd, Kay Peterson, Newton Potter, and Richard Peterson Members Absent: Lois Carlson President Connie Lambert opened the meeting. The minutes were approved as mailed. Old Business: Connie reported that she had nothing further regarding teleconferencing of PLS board meetings. Motion was made by Larry Ladd and seconded by Rich Peterson and unanimously passed to recommend Kay Johnson to the City Council for the unfilled position on the local library board. The most recent Pioneerland Internet Policy was reviewed. New Business: Mary Henke reported on the plans for the budget presentation to the McLeod County Commissioner on Tuesday, October 3, 2000. Mary Henke reported on the plans for training of local library staff on the new interlibrary loan • system. Connie aM Mary discussed establishing a long -range plan for building maintenance and improvement. Connie appointed Newton Potter to work with the library maintenance man (Archie) and city personnel to inspect the facilities and set up a long -range plan. Mary reported that the book sale during the Arts & Crafts weekend netted $647, which will be matched by AAL. The funds are generated and administered by the Friends of the Library. The next meeting will be October 23, at 4:30 p.m. The meeting was adjourned. Richard A. Peterson, Acting Secretary • /-/_�) -2 • TREE BOARD MINUTES AUGUST 28, 2000 Members Present: Brain Wendlandt, Victor Schmidt, Rose Jergens, and Mark Schnobrich Absent: Mike Getzke, Deane Dietel June 26, 2000 Tree Board Minutes were approved. Energy Tree Project 2000 The board will meet Wednesday Sept. 20` at 5:15 P.M. City Center to review the final report of the Year 2000 Energy Tree Project. The board will then discuss the presentation to Hutchinson Utilities Commission and to seek additional funding for year 2001. The Utility • Commission meets Sept. 27, 2000 at 3:OOP.M. at Hutchinson Utilities. A total of 72 homes applied for trees with 65 of those homes receiving trees. The average home received 2 or more trees for energy conservation. A total of 165 trees went onto private property in 2000. Review of Tree Ordinance The board reviewed all the changes of the tree ordinance. The predominant changes were in the areas of ; 1.) Duties of tree board members 2.) Definitions of shade tree diseases 3.) Tree species allowed to be planted list 4.) Clearance above streets for tree height 5.) Arborist certification The board approved the revised ordinance and sent it on to the city attorney for final drafting. 40 Other Business • Randall. Bradford The board discussed the Randall, Bradford area and pending proposal to remove every other maple. The board agreed that a public hearing discussing the proposal be made and the neighborhood residents be invited to provide input into the project. Schnobrich will put together a plan for the presentation. - Electing a Chair Schnobrich brought up to the board the need to appoint a chair to the board. All board members are on their first term of 3 years with the possibility to be re- appointed. Dean Dietel's, Mike Getzke's term expires April 2001. Rose Jergen's and Brain Wendlandt's term expires April 2002. Victor Schmidt's term expires April 2003. This item was tabled to the next meeting. With no other business the meeting was adjourned at 7:001P.M. Respectfully submitted, Mark Schnobrich Forester CITY OF HUTCHINSON • BUILDING / PLANNING / ZONING DEPARTMENT 111 HASSAN STREET S.E., HUTCHINSON, MN 55350 PHONE: 612. 234 -4216 FAX: 612- 234.4240 • • TOTAL' VALUATION $1,893,178 TOTAL PERMITS 71 TOTAL INSPECTIONS 204 -(a-) - -:� NEW RESIDENTIAL PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED HOUSEKEEPING twn Nrmberd I Vaka6unof NunOerd vakawof BUILDINGS No. Bu6dkpe Hnaky Units or"Ncanlw Bu9args H � On* w e ) c e ) dot" 1235.000 101 2 2 SsplrarNy horaM, e6■■INd S,Pr•adM pwNaad e■4 +a u,b dow aNU,r. rk 102 �• TWD-fWWY OjMngs 102 Tww ■ 4 tour -ww 104 Fhsa- 106 TOTAL' Sun d' 101.106 109 NEW RESIDENTIAL PRNATELY OVRVE0 PUBLICLY OW ED NONHOUSEKEEPING hem NumbVof Vakillow of Numbr O( Va mbonof BUILDINGS NO. OOrWns9on °On1°' Oominslbn Ome cents Om6 rape a c e H0404, moaa. ■no moot rabkw tr■ ak" som mnceYar 219 Odw mNawkeepkrp sh~ 214 N E WP RRIATELY OWNED PUBUCLYOWNED NONRESIDENTIAL hem Nw*w VWUWOnOf NU76WOf v■kmdcnd BUILDINGS No. Of ommbiwdcn Buldlrgs comtruction A-d" Om6 twits Caw ma e c Amuerrwi. eodsL end rsa Iowa 316 Chucme and dlw reN&w 319 mduW W 320 Psddn9 9Ya9as (h**W 6 qw drdad) 321 a as maum" aM mpar Pa0•• 322 Has00YS ■rid MdIWOra1 373 Olfl n banks. arid prdestlansl 324 Publlc works ■nd 061m 325 SCgds ■nd o6w ■dura6oml 326 1 450,000 Smm aM nWmw wvicw 377 O6w nouadder" brAdrps 179 Sbuc4■ra odw than bu9dkgs 329 ADDITIONS, PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICLY OWNED ALTERATK)US, hem Number vsludbnd Numbwof Vdratlard AND CONVERSIONS NO. Of Oar■ucdon B"o"o• condmolbn Bu9rarw OR* afore OrreC Una ' le) (b) (c) (d) (e) Raddemkl - Cypyy addb" of 434 preyes cw ods h ham 439 8 583 NawWtlNd r rid natraak •••Pkq 431 Additlaa of iaeldrwd orepas rid raven• Isdadad s id 436 2 22 500 DEWOLMNS PR IVATELY PUBLICLY OWNED AND RAZING hem Nunbm Nu blt Of Number d Nunhw of OF BUILDINGS No. of Hmeft miss BLlIl*w Hm" units ■ c Skfplrlem9/ haws (■Otlad rd deaawl 616 Twolydry bAd ps 616 Thnke- and k 4w* bu6a W 647 Fhs•a- aOity bull" 646 All o6w bukings ofd skn¢haee 6K N. TOTAL' VALUATION $1,893,178 TOTAL PERMITS 71 TOTAL INSPECTIONS 204 -(a-) - -:� NgVDUAL PERM AUTHOM M OONSTFNN:TION VALUED AT S MAW OR MORE PIaN pim dw Amy YrortnW on br sh PEA audwdzi'q oanAuctlan vabAd at 5600.000 a may. .nlrrrE Inanry olthembm ..auas ttrn No eh�ove svcd s (U � (b) w� buww (c) wk (X) orr (0) custucUm aMOxn (s) Number a urge (0 (9) •! 434' AM DARYANI Kprk-to o Pubm - t 534,000 1� 550 CLINTON AVE SW HUTCHINSON PLANO TX 65093 437 W prL%T 3M COMPANY PMea a P V 550,000 - - WIM ST SE HUTCHINSON, MN 909 ADAMS ST SE Km d . -.- y 0 P&N * 0 Pubic i wm of army a awre O Pt"W i comm.nh Am you e a erry rrrr Ponr*wry )ubddtarr4 O No. 0 Ym • PNae VW addbxW kftn n in opnnerw. Name a Perem to conted .0mcky_m. mpon TelePlgne Ara code Nxrbw ExWwiM Tm. II I I II � UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL A.. Q/J.1ML .e... W fob lOfrOl V,t4AQ.AlT, PfMfAOE LULL ee PAD ev APOP688@ F. W. Dodp A CAW /lYY�1t•d }W Bwldbv Sla ks PO Box 609 L=bom MA 0242095M 3tl3H 31"18 3O" +HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION 0 0 August 28, 2000 ::30 p.m. ArrivaLDeparture Building Minutes Members present: Joe Dooley, Steve Crow. Robert Hantge, Dave Skaar Members absent: Jim Faber Others Present: John Olson, City of Hutchinson There was a quorum of members present The minutes of July 31, 2000 were approved Coming activities: Airport promotion — Skaar reported that several individuals had toured the airport facilities in conjunction with a presentation made to the local "Breakfast Club ". Airshow — Commissioners were reminded of an airshow, sponsored by the Viking Council. BSA. that would be held from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Saturday September 23, 2000. Signs — Maintenance began the process of shaping the land at the old airport entrance in preparation for the "Hutchinson" sign at Pidgewater College that will be moved to the airport in August. Facilities: Utlilties — Motion by Hantge, seconded by Dooley that the City of Hutchinson request that Hutchinson Utilities install gas and electric services to the airport, as airport facilities are now within the corporate limits of the City of Hutchinson. Operations & Maintenance Capital Improvement Plan —Olson presented commission members with the Capital Improvement Plan for the airport (attached). Olson also reported that funding for general aviation airports, which is Hutchinson's classification, had improved. The Federal Aviation Administration will be funding general aviation airports at a greater level than in the past Commission meetings — Olson presented the option to the Commission for a schedule related to subjects, rather than having a monthly meeting. The Commission felt that because the Phase 11 project was completed, there would be no reason to meet on a monthly basis into the foreseeable future. A meeting schedule will be set up to address the following subjects: Budget, Capital Improvement Plan: Operations & Maintenance of the airport: Facilities: Navigation and safety systems: Last Monday in June of each year. Monday prior to'IhanUgiving each year. Last Monday of March each year. Last Monday in September each year. Commission membership — Olson reported that Joe Dooley's last meeting as an airport commission member would be in September 2000. Olson will contact persons who have filled out an application in the past to determine his replacement. Motion by Hantge and a second by Crow to adjourn. Next meeting: September 25, 2000 at 5:30 p.m. at the ArrivaVDeparture building. .Z/-4 r1 — +HUTCHINSON AIRPORT COMMISSION September 25, 2000 5:30 p.m. Arrival/Departure Building Minutes Members present: Joe Dooley, Jim Faber, Robert Hantge Members absent: Steve Crow, Dave Skaar Others Present: John Olson, City of Hutchinson; Tom Parker, Hutchinson Aviation: Berme Knutson, Civil Air Patrol; Charles Brill, Hutchinson resident: Jerome Burmeister, Maint. Ops. Tech., City of Hutchinson There was a quorum of members present. The minutes of August 28, 2000 were not available to be approved. Coming activities: Airport promotion — Bernie Knutson presented a letter of invitation to the dedication ceremony for the new Civil Air Patrol building, to be held Tuesday, October 3, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. The program will recognize contributors to the facility and refreshments will be provided- Robert Hantge requested that airport commissioners be available on Tuesday, October 10, 2000 starting at about 4:30 p.m. for a "Business After Hours ", sponsored by the Hutchinson Area Chamber of Commerce. The evening would include tours of the airport facilities and Skydive Hutchinson. Refreshments will be provided Airsbow — Dooley reported that Saturday's airshow, sponsored by the Viking Council, BSA, was a success, despite the cool temperatures. The airshow was held from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Saturday September 23, 2000. Signs — Electrical service was activated and the foundation was laid for installation of the "Hutchinson" sign at Ridgewater College that will be moved to the airport in August Commissioners requested signs at the stop signs coming onto the apron that read: "Aircraft owners and Pilots Only". The signs are available from aircraft suppliers. Parker will provide a catalog to City maintenance stat£ Facilities: Fueling facilities — Motion by Dooley, seconded by Hantge that the City of Hutchinson request make necessary upgrades to the Avgas system, including the installation of an updated card reader, monitor, pump, and reel for Avgas. The estimated cost of the project is approximately $15,000. The motion passed unanimously. Operations & Maintenance Commission membership — Charles "Chuck" Brill,))) Jefferson St SE, Hutchinson visited the meeting. Chuck has agreed to fill the vacancy left by Joe Dooley. Fire Department Training — The Hutchinson Fire Department will be getting a tour of the airport this evening. Knutson will be going over the potential hazards associated with aircraft and fire or rescue operations. Olson and Knutson will give the fire fighters a tour of the facility so they are familiar with the airport. Maintenance Operations Technician — Jerome Burmeister, Maint. Ops. Tech., was introduced to the airport commissioners and others present. Jerome's position is'' /] time at the airport and I/, time at the cemetery. Commissioners and others were encouraged to contact Burmeister with matters pertaining to maintenance. Motion by Dooley and a second by Hantge to adjourn. • Next meeting: Tentatively set for November 27, 2000 at 5:30 pun. at the Arrival/Departure building. Topic for the meeting will be: Operations & Maintenance of the Airport Y -(1 ) - 41 CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT To: Hutchinson City Council From: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Date: September 19, 2000 — Meeting Date September 26, 2000 Re: Deletion of portion of the building code In 1998, the City adopted the Uniform Building Code (UBC) of 1997 and the Minnesota Building Code of 1998. Within that adoption (Ordinance No. 98 -242), chapter 1306 Special Fire Protection Systems was adopted. After researching the code adoption history of the City, it was determined that this portion of the UBC was adopted in error. Not many chapters of the UBC are `optional ". The remaining portion of the list included with the code revision are required chapters if the community has adopted the UBC. There are other chapters (chapter 33 which addresses excavation) which are considered `optional ". I have discussed this issue with the Fire Chief and he concurs that the chapter is not necessary. Staff is recommending the City Code be amended as outlined in the proposed ordinance. 0 is PUBLICATION NO. ORDINANCE NO. 2000- 285 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 4.01 OF THE HUTCHINSON CITY CODE DELETING E. 1306 SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS Section 4.01. BUILDING CODE ADOPTED. The Minnesota State Building Code (SBC), including the following: The 1998 Minnesota State Building Code includes the following chapter of Minnesota Rules: A. 1300 Minnesota Building Code (1998) B. 1301 Building Official Certification C. 1302 Construction Approvals D. 1305 Adoption of the Uniform Building Code (1997), including Appendix Chapters: 1. 3, Division 1, Dentention and Correctional Facilities 2. 12, Division 11, Sound Transmission Control 3. 15, Reroofing' 4. 18, Waterproofing and Dampproofmg Foundations 5. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures F. 1307 Elevators and Related Devices G. 1315 Adoption of the National Electrical Code (1996) H. 1325 Solar Energy Systems 1. 1330 Fallout Shelters J. 1335 Floodproofmg Regulations K. 1341 Accessibility Code L. 1346 Adoption of the Uniform Mechanical Code (1991) M. 1350 Manufactured Homes N. ; 1360 Prefabricated Buildings O. 1361 Industrialized/Modular Buildings P. 1370 Storm Shelters (Manufactured Home Parks) Q. 4715 Minnesota Plumbing Code (1994) R 7670 Minnesota Energy Code (1994) EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall take effect upon is adoption and publication. Adopted by the City Council this day of September. 2000. Attest Gary D. Marlin Torgerson, Mayor • • September 25, 2000 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Hutchinson From: HUTCHINSON AREA SAFETY COUNCIL CC: John Rodeberg, Dir. of Engineering/Public Works, City of Hutchinson Joe DeJaeghere, MN DNR Trails, 20596 Hwy 7, Hutchinson, MN 55350 Subject: Petition for action to be taken by City Council A motion passed unanimously at the H utchinson Area Safety Council meeting of September 25, 2000 calls for the City Council to request a crossing signal at the intersection of Main Street North and the Luce Line Trail. The Safety Council identified this intersection as having the greatest potential for light and heavy traffic accidents. Some potential designs could include a pedestrian- activated wanting system or some combination of warning signs and illummation. The request for a crossing signal, of appropriate design, should be addressed to: Dave Johnston, MnIDOT Regional Engineer Hutchinson Area Transportation Services 1400 Adams St SE Hutchinson, MN • Phone: (320) 234 -4287; Fax: (320) 234-6971 Regardless of the final outcome of this petition, the resolve to bring safety at this intersection to the attention of the City Council and Ma DOT was unanimous. Every reasonable attempt to improve safety at this intersection should be made until the scheduled improvements to the Main Strut Bridge are made in future years. • RESOLUTION NO. 11583 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR SOUTH GRADE TRAIL Be it resolved that the City of Hutchinson will act as the sponsoring agency for a "Transportation Enhancement" project identified as the South Grade Trail and acknowledges herewith that it is willing to be the project sponsor. knowing full well that such sponsorship includes a willingness to secure and guarantee the local share of the costs associated with this project and responsibility for seeing this project through to its completion. with compliance of all applicable laws, rules and regulations. Be it further resolved that John Rodeberg, Director of EnOneerinW%blic Works, is hereby authorized to act as agent on behalf of this applicant. Agreement to Maintain WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration (FWHA) requires that states agree to operate and maintain facilities constructed with federal transportation funds for the useful life of the improvement and not change the use of right -of -way acquired without prior approval from the FHWA, and: WHEREAS, transportation enhancement programs receive federal funding from the Surface Transportation Program (STP) of the Transportation Efficiency Act (TEA -21) of 1997, and; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has determined that • for projects implemented with transportation enhancement funds. this requirement should be applied to the project sponsor; WHEREAS, the City of Hutchinson is the project sponsor for the transportation enhancement project identified as the South Grade Trail NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA hereby agrees to assume full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of property and facilities related to the aforementioned transportation enhancement project. Adopted this 10th day of October, 2000, by the City Council of Hutchinson, Minnesota. Mayor - Marlin Torgerson City Administrator - Gary D. Plotz E RESOLUTION NO. 11585 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE LOCATION OF POLLING PLACE FOR ALL PRECINCTS AND APPOINTING JUDGES FOR THE 2000 FEDERAL GENERAL ELECTION AND SPECIAL CITY ELECTION WHEREAS, Chapter 204B, Section 204B.16, Subd. 1 and Section 204B.21, Subd. 2 of the Laws of Minnesota states that the governing body of any municipality, by resolution adopted prior to the giving of notice of the election, may designate the location of polling place of all precincts (one, two and three) and naming of judges for the Federal General (November 7, 2000) Election and Special City Election (November 7, 2000). NOW THEREF BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That the polling place to be used during the 2000 Federal General Election and Special City Election for all precincts will be in the Recreation Center located at 900 Harrington Street S.W., Hutchinson MN. • That the Election Judges are hereby appointed in accordance with the attached list. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Marlin D. Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 0 �4-j -'� ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON FEDERAL GENERAL ELECTION 2000 NOVEMBER 7, 2000 PRECINCT 1 HARRIET SCHMIDT 587 -5466 45 SHERWOOD CR ROXANNE JENSEN 587 -8589 1239 BRADFORD SE ANNETTE KOEHLER 587 -6484 55 ORCHARD AVE SE PATSY WRIGHT 587 -4903 1300 SHERWOOD ST SE CLARA TEWS 537 -5235 714 JEFFERSON ST SE JUNE WICK 587 -6248 535 MAIN ST S ETHEL LARSON 587 -8193 115 JEFFERSON ST SE PRECINCT 2 RUTH HAGEN 587 -8109 554 CLARK ST SEDONA MILLER 587 -2205 1235 GOLFVIEW CT NW DORIS DAGGETT 587 -2382 978 ROLLING GREENS LN EVELYN PROCHNOW 587 -2723 250 FREMONT AVE SE DIANNE MARQUARDT 587 -8199 234 - 4TH AVE NW DEETTA MCLAIN 587 -6069 755 SPRUCE ST HARRIET BURICH 587 -5010 583 CARLISLE NE DORI•JOHNSON 587 -2985 1270 ROLLING OAKS LN PRECINCT 3 PEARL SEALE 587 -3083 569 MILLER DARLEEN KNIGGE 587-0961 674 HARRINGTON PHYLLIS WESELOH 587 -6318 1109 LEWIS AVE HARRIET WIXCEY 587 -2353 360 W. PISHEY LARRY LADD 587 -3119 965 OSGOOD AVE SW JOHN HASSINGER 587 -3150 546 2 TD AVE SW MARVA POWELL 587 -8042 684 HARRINGTON ST SW REGISTRATION TABLE DOLORES BRUNNER 587 -7258 968 HAYDEN AVE BILL ARNDT 587 -6882 1660 SOUTH GRADE RD. MARGARET OLSON 587 -6039 640 TYLER ST SW • RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GRANT AGREEMENT WITH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES RESOLUTION NO. iLUf WHEREAS, The City of Hutchinson has experienced an increase in the use of snowmobiles for recreational purposes; AND WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has grant monies available for enforcement and safety education; AND WHEREAS, The City of Hutchinson Police Services is planning to increase enforcement and safety education for snowmobile operation; AND WHEREAS, The Department of Natural Resources has awarded a $1,000 grant to the City of Hutchinson: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. That the City Council authorizes the Hutchinson Police Services to enter into • a grant with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, during the . a . period July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2001, in the amount of $1,000. 2. That the City Council authorizes the Director of Police/Emergency Management Services to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behaH of the City of Hutchinson. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator • CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 11597 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE FOR THE 2000 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2001 Be it resolved by the Council of the City of Hutchinson, County of McLeod, Minnesota, that the County Auditor is authorized to fix a property tax rate for taxes payable in the year 2001 that is higher than the tax rate calculated pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 275.078 for the city for taxes levied in 1999, collectible in 2000. Adoption of this resolution does not prohibit the city from certifying a final levy that will result in no tax rate increase or a tax rate decrease. The City Finance Director is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the county auditor of McLeod County, Minnesota 0 Adopt - M by the City Council this 10` day of October 2000 Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator L J #4) - 5 LEVY CERTIFICATION TAX RATE TAXES PAYABLE 2001 City of Hutchinson I, Cindy Schultz, County Auditor of McLeod County do hereby certify the 2001 "Levy Certification Tax Rate". Witness my hand and seal this 2nd day of October. McLeod County, Minnesota Column A Column B Payable 2000 Payable 2001 1. Certified Net Tax Capacity Levy $ 3,269,023 $ 3,900,000 2. Certified Referendum Market Value Levy $ - $ - 3. Total Certified Levy ( 1 + 2 ) $ 3,269,023 $ 3,900,000 4. Certified Levy for General Obligations Bonds $ 1,429,575 $ 1,361,775 5. Total Certified Non -Debt Levy ( 3 - 4 ) $ 1,839,448 $ 2,538,225 6. Payable 2001 Fiscal Disparity Distribution Tax $ - $ - 7. Total Fiscal Disparity Adjusted Non -Debt Levy ( 5 - 6) $ 1,839,448 $ 2,538,225 8. Payable 2001 HACA Net Tax Capacity Adjustment $ 38 N/A 9. Payab4e.2001 HACA Fiscal Disparity Adjustment $ - N/A 10. "Net Levy" (7 - 8 - 9 ) $ 1,839,410 $ 2,538,225 11. Payable 2001 Taxable Net Tax Capacity $ 8,378,588 $ 8,378,588, 12. Levy Certification Tax Rate ( 10 / 11 ) 21.950% 30.290% If line 10 of Column B Is greater than line 10 of Column A, a resolution approving a levy tax rate Increase must be adopted by the governing body and submitted to the certification County Auditor by October 20, 2000. I, Cindy Schultz, County Auditor of McLeod County do hereby certify the 2001 "Levy Certification Tax Rate". Witness my hand and seal this 2nd day of October. McLeod County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 11598 Manufacturers 200OWeek Whereas: Manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business sector in Minnesota Providing $18 billion in 1998 wages, and Whereas: Manufacturing produces $28.3 billion for the state economy and is the second largest single share (18.9 %) of our gross product, and Whereas: Manufacturing exports brought nearly $9.2 billion into the Minnesota economy in 1999, and Whereas: Manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs which significantly contribute to Minnesota's high standard of living and economic vitality; and Whereas: Manufacturing contributed nearly $232 million in corporate income taxes in Minnesota, more than any other business sector, about 30% of total corporate income taxes in 1999: Now Therefore, I Marlin Torgerson . Mayor of Hutchinson Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of October 16-22,2000 to be Minnesota Manufacturers Week In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the City of Hutchinson Minnesota to be affixed at the City Office this Tenth day of October, Two Thousand. Mayor • City Administrator RESOLUTION 11584 CERTIFYING ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY • OF HUTCHINSON TO THE COUNTY OF MCLEOD BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA COUNTY OF MCLEOD, STATE OF MINNESOTA That the following amoracea unpaid assessments levied try the City Ccurrct of Hutchinson, Minnesota, under Statutes Sec. 429.011 to 429.111 for the various asswaments of the City of Hutchlnson, to be levied and assessed upon the properties as listed for the following purposes for the current year, and that a copy thereof be sent to the County Audftw of said McLeod County, Mkmessta: WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER 10th Installment of 10 yr assessment Rd SM 91 -01 San, Storm, Wato n 10th Inehtlrtent of 10 yr assessment Roll #287 91-02 San, Watsmtain, Lift 1 Oth instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol #268 91.10 d 12 San, Storm, Water - 10th instalknemt of 10 yr assesenwt Rd #273 91 -24 San. Sewer, Watermaln 9th inafatiment of 10 yr assamrrom Rd #275A 92 -01 San, Storm, Watermaln 9th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol1#275B 92-03, 04 San, Storm, Water 9th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol #276 San, Storm, Watermam, St 9th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rd #277 San, Storm, Walarmakm, St 9th instalment of 10 yr assewnent Rd #278 San, Storn, Wetemish, St 9th instatrrent of 10 yr asaassrnwrt Roll #281 San, Storm, Watemein, St Stn installim of10yraseasunwd Rol #283 9314 San Sewer, Watermaln 8th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rd #285 93-02 San Sawn 8th installment of 10 yr sssemant Rd #287 9316 Stare, San, Watemtetn BM Installment of 10 yr assessrrna t Roll 0230A 93 Proles Salary Seam 7th InstaWrwt of 10 yr assessment Rd #299 Slam Ssvwr, San 6 Watermain 7th installment of 10 yr assessment Rd #221A Waterrrekm 94 Project • 7th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rd #290 94.02 Storm Sever, San, Water - 741o. irMaknent of 10 yr assessment Roll #291 94-05 Storm Sewer, San, Water 7th inststrtent of 10 yr assessment Rol #293 94-18 Storm Sewer, San, Water 7h installment of 10 yr assessment Rd #294 94-03 Storm Sewer, San, Water 7th instalment of 10 yr assessment: Rd #295 94-24 Storm Sever, San, Water 7th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #298 9409 Stern Sewer, San, Water 7th irnWknent of 10 yr assesmrsrt Rd #297 94-04 Storm Sewer, San, Water 7th Installment of 10 yr assessment Rd #299 94-10 Storm Sewer, San, Water 6th installment of 10 yr assessment Rd #2948 Storm Sewer, San & Wstemnin Sh instalment of 5 yr assessment Roll #121 D Walerrnaln 8th Iretallinent of 10 yr assessment Rol 0300 95435 Stamsewer, San 8 Water 611th instalknert of 10 yr asseesrnent Rd #301 95-09 Stcmmeewer, San 8 Water 6th installment of 10 yr assessment Rd 0302 95-04 Stommsewer, San 6 Water 6th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 9303 95-12 Stomeewwr, San d Water Stn inataWnsnt of 10 yr assessment Rd 9305 95-01 Stommsewer, San & Water 6th instalerent of 10 yr assessment Rd 11906 95-17 Slornsw~, San 6 Water 6th kntalment of 10 yr assewmerd Rd #310 9&01 San Sewer, Watenrreln, Sm 6th Installment of 10 yr asseserment Rd SM7 95-23 Stamsewer, San 6 Water 6th insfalknart of 6 yr assessrnert Rd 8240D 95 San Sewer, Wabw we 5th Installment of 9 yr esesumat Rd 0307A 95.24 San Sawn, Watw,nah Sm, St 5th krta4nent of 9 yr assessment Rd #309A 95-24 San Sawn, Water Connsotbn 5th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rd #5000 9607 Sm, San Sewer, Wdemm9n, St 5th f stalkttert of 10 yr assessrmmert Rd #5002 9617118 San Sewer, WeiislmWm 5th insta kne t of 10 yr assassnert Rd #5004 97-05M Waterman, Sat Sewer, St (r) 5th ketaNnent of 10 yr assessment Rd #221 B WaNrmaln MPs 5th IrMarrwt of 10 yr assessment Rd #2300 Sam, Storm 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Rd 05018 97 -28 Trunk Sm" Sewer g:yssesame12000collecVwVfi=bon 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5019 95 -04 San Sewer 4th Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5020 97 San Sewer 3rd installment of 9 yr assessment Roll #5018A 97 -28 Trunk Sanitary Sewer 3rd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5022 38.13 Sanitary Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #5025 99-08 Water Main 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 115029 9RW4 San Sewer, Water Main 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5031 99-10 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Rob #5032 99-35 Water Main Sanitary Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr aeaeesment Roll 0067A 76 Prof Water Main, def ease activated 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #291A 94 prof, Water Main, Sanitary Sewer 2nd Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #2938 94 proj, Water Main, Sanitary Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #295A 94 prof, Water Main, Sanitary Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roil #50158 97 pro], Water Main 2nd installment of 10 yr assesarnent Rol #5020A 97 pro!, Water Main 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 95034 99-38 Sanitary Sewer, Water Maln 1st installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5039 2000 -12 -13-17 Sanitary Sewer, Water main 1 at instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol #5040 2000 -17 Sanitary Sewer 1st installment of 10 yr assessment Rol 05044 2000 -13 Sanitary Sewer, Water Main 1st instalment of 10 yr assessment Rog # 221C Water main 94 Project 1 at instalment of 10 yr assessment Roll #290A 94-02 Storm Sewer, San, Water 1st unitalhment of 10 yr assesstnent Rol #291C 94-05 Stones Sewer, San, Watar 15t instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol #291 D 94-05 Storm Sewn, San, Water let installment of 10 yr assessment Rol 05034A 9316 San" Sewer, Water Main 1st Installment of 10yr assessment Rdl 2300 San, Storm STORM SEWER 10th instalment of 10 yr assessment Roll 0269 91 -04,05 & 06 Storm Sewer loth instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol 0271 91 -11 Storm Sewer 1 Oth installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #272 91 -07 Stone Sewer 1 Oth installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #274 91 -25 Storm Sewer 8th instalment of 10 yr assessment Roll 0059A 93 Project Waterman, San Saver 8th instaYment of 10 yr assessment Rol 0080B 93 Project 6th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #308 95 Project, San Sewer Trunk • 6th instalment of 10 yr assessment Rol #309 95 Project, San Sewer Trunk 61E installment of 10 yr assessment Roe 9311 96-02 Project Sm, Street 6th installment of 6 yr assessment Roll 0122C Stones Sesser Sign installment of 5 yr assessment Rol 0122D 95 Project San Sewer 5th installment of 10 yr assessment Roil #5001 96-12 Storm Sewer & St 4th instalbnent of 10 yr assessment Rol OW15 97 -25 San Sawer 4th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5016 97 -28 san Sewer 3rd installment of 9 yr assessment Rod #5016A 97 -28 San Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roil #5027 9313 Stones Sewer 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll #5028 9334 Stones Sewer tat Installment of 10 yr asseasment Roll #5037 2000.5.6 Stones Sewer 1 at installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #5038 2000 -23 Stones Sewer 1 at instalment of 10 yr assessment Rod #5041 2000.20 Storm Sewer tsl instadrnent of 10yr assessment Roll 05046 2000 -23 Storm Sewer 1st installment of Syr assessment Roll 050160 97 -28 San Sewer STREETIMPROVEMENTS 10th Instalment of 10 yr assessment Rod #264 90.116 U. SurUCurb/Gutter 10th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #270 91 -13 & 14 U. Surf & Appur Oth installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #073A 93 Project CtaW Gutter 8th Installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 0259A 93 Project BIL Surf/Gravel 8th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #284 93-07 Stre*Curb/GLLIer 8th installment of 10 yr assessment Roil 9286 93-09 Bit. SurffCU4/Gulter 8th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol 058A Grsde & Gravel 7th Installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #2308 San Sewer, St, Ls 7th installment of 10 yr assessment Rol #292 94.13 1 113 Wes course • g:lluwsamst2000colecicerfifieabm —2— 6th installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 1304 9520 Bit Baa 4th inalallnent of 10 yr assessment Roil 05007 97 -02AvidarnWgrsding 3rd installment of 10 yr assessment Rod 05021 98-04 Street 3rd instalment of 10 yr assessment Roil 05021 B 97 -30 Grading Bit and Baas 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Rol 05026 99.22 Bit -Base 2nd installment of 10 yr assessment Roll 05030 99-36 Bit War course 2nd installment of 10 yr aaaessmerd Roll 15033 99-39 Sub -grade E appur 2nd installment of 10yr assessment Roil 0069A 77 Prof, def asas activated 2nd installment of 1Cyr assessment Rog 0099A 81 pros, def asse adlvsted 1 at irstalk nevi of 1 Oyr assessment Roil 05042 2000 -24 Street TRUNK SANITARY SEWER 1 at InataLYnent of 10yr assessment Roil 05043 2000 -02 Tnmk Sewer 19t installment of 1 Dyr assessment Rol 05045 2000.25 Trunk, Storm Sewer OFF STREET PARKING Unpaid weed aftfing bills to be certified to tries Loup Brunner city ID031- 117 -29.12 -0120 301 4th Ave NW county ID0 058 0720 Hutdrkmson MN 55350 Amount $119.23 ALS WovaNral 12- 116.33- 0243451 SW CMveMrd Ave SW 421 0025 Hutch son MN 55350 Amount $183.94 State of MN Tent 12- 116. 30-02-0430 1138 Cheyenne St 389 0390 Hutchinson MN 55350 Amount 5119.23 DsnsUs Groebns 36117 -3D- 11-0420 505 California St 312 0090 Hu m MN 55350 Amount 5 119.23 11 13th instalment of 15 yr assessment Roil 9152A 1984 Off Street Parking 5th Installment of 15 yr asseesmend Roil 05006 Prldrg 2nd inwfa9rnent of 10 yr aaaeprtamt Rd 05038 98-18 hospital paddrg lot REASSESSED ROLLS 4th installment of 5 yr assesamerd Rob 05009 4th installment of 5 yr aasaswrwd Rd 05010 4th Installment of 5 yr asaeaamart Roil 05011 4th Irshinent of 5 yr aaaassment Rdl 03012 4th Installmen t of 5 yr assessment Rd 05013 4th installment of 5 yr asseansnt Rd 05014 MISCELLANEOUS • 3rd IrstaOment of 10 yr assessment RoINSC24 1998 Mlsc ' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: ALL THESE UNPAID BILLS TO BE CERTIFIED TO 2001 TAXES Unpaid water and saver bills to be cartiflsd to taxes county 00 Jett Traider city ID012- 118.30-030090 1055 Dale St SW county ID0 012 1800 Hutd" n MN 553W Amount $306.00 Unpaid weed aftfing bills to be certified to tries Loup Brunner city ID031- 117 -29.12 -0120 301 4th Ave NW county ID0 058 0720 Hutdrkmson MN 55350 Amount $119.23 ALS WovaNral 12- 116.33- 0243451 SW CMveMrd Ave SW 421 0025 Hutch son MN 55350 Amount $183.94 State of MN Tent 12- 116. 30-02-0430 1138 Cheyenne St 389 0390 Hutchinson MN 55350 Amount 5119.23 DsnsUs Groebns 36117 -3D- 11-0420 505 California St 312 0090 Hu m MN 55350 Amount 5 119.23 11 Adopted by the CAy C ncrl ttue 1 Oth day of October, 2000. MARLIN TORGERSON, MAYOR ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11599 RESOLUTION REJECTING IMPROVEMENT . LETTING NO.5 PROJECT NO. 00-07,00-08,00-09, 00 -10 WHEREAS, pursuant to a Notice for Hearing for the improvement of : Project No. 00-07 College Avenue NE from TH 15 to Hillcrest Road NE by construction of storm sewer, watenmain, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and Project No. 00 -08 Hillcrest Road NE from 6th Avenue NE to Walnut Street NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00 -09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street Road NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00-10 Spruce Court NE, North of 6th Avenue NE by construction of sanitary sewer services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. a hearing was held on February 22nd, 2000. • AND WHEREAS, it has been found that this improvement is not feasible at this time. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Said improvement is hereby rejected. Adopted by the Hutchinson City Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator it • APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 • date Submitted (Must be 4 weeks Prior to'dance.date) / b Name of Ill Otnizaaon Names Acktress iOne . Location of Nance Arfv�� HeacthCfOrwd+bt► be�pr1�60olted -- L :rY f� _ : No Ftewe;�ron nun dances�n: befae? , :,,. y�, -; No No Signature of Applicant • 1VORMSTANCEPERW 09199 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT FEE $50.00 0abs- 8obmitt9d f K4ust boA weeks prior to dano date ho a Signature of Applicant 0 I.ToRMSIDANCEPERW .// -cr �. �� ?1 d Locatibryof Omm fl� (A -- 3 ,,.. 'Staff NO +klcft �� -i3ti No A No Signature of Applicant 0 I.ToRMSIDANCEPERW .// -cr 0 Memorandum To: Mayor & City Council CC: Gary D. Plotz, City Administra tor Steve Madson, Police Chief From: Marilyn J. Swanson, Administrative Secretary Dam: October 6, 2000 Re: TRANSIENT MERCHANT PERMIT FOR T.A.P. ENTERPRISES, INC. T.A.P. Enterprises, Inc. has held tool auctions in Hutchinson since 1994. The company was investigated and approved when their application was first submitted. There have been no known complaints regarding the company or the products sold. Since Police Chief Steve Madson is on vacation this week, I was unable to obtain a signature of approval on the application form. Attachment n =sue TO KI 1 10/05/00 11:18 FAX 402 209 3511 TAP.ENTEPRISES la 001 Doc -02 -99 09:67A City oP Hutchinson 320 234 4260 P_O1 mvw R IrIgIM l04 "js�leY�.wMI NASU SE K IN aim= APPLICATION FOR RaI: 32'0- 234 -4240 PEDDLERS. SOLICITORS. AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS 2" : 2" Picture required NAME and DRIVER'S LICENSE INFORMATION NAME: — 1. a/Q - L PERMANENT ADDRESS: +/ PERMANENT TELEPHONE: TEMPORARY LOCAL ADDRESS. jene4e.Y r _ TEMPORARY TELEPHONE ACCESS: A — 5 - 7 - ) DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBER (STATE) (P HEIGRIJJW WEIGHT.1 COLOR FEES A LENGTH OF PERMIT REQUESTED How many days? Months? Or year? LICENSE FEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: ppyiication Fee of SZ5 applied towards the following permit fee(s) Solicitors, per day ....... ..... .... S 25.00 S icitors, per year ................... . ":�' nsient Me per day Transient Merchants, Per year 5200.00 Peddlers, per day " Peddlers ." " " ".. "" S 25.00 Per Year .......... ............................... $200.00 BACKGROUND STATEMENT HAVE You BEEN CONVICTED OF ANY CRIME, MISDEMEANOR, OR VIOLATION OF ANY MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE, OTHER THAN TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS? YES N cj IF YES, STATE NATURE OF OFFENSE AND PUNISHMENT OR PENALTY ASSESSED THEREFORE. is i�� 10/05/00 11:19 FAX 402 289 3511 TAP ENTEPRISES Dec -02 -99 09 :47A City of Hutchinson 320 234 4240 DESCRIBE NATURE OF BUSINESS AND DESCRIBE ITEM OFFERED: 416' 2002 P -02 DESCRIBE METHOD OF DELIVERY: Sc ,yam DESCRIBE YOUR SOURCE OF SUPPLY - NAME & ADDRESS OF SUPPLIER: �d1A.✓ iSE �dfs /l 5.0-ID PROVIDE TWO (2) MCLEOD COUNTY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR CHARACTER REFERENCES: NAME S ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: NAME 4 ADDRESS; PHONE NUMBER: STATE LAST CITY YOU CARRIED ON SAME ACTIVITY: CITY /STATE NAME: GATE OF ACTIVITY: FROM: A Yj TO: a4 " -2- 10/05/00 11:19 FAS 402 289 3511 TAP EYMPRISES 4 003 o,ac 02' -99 09 :47A City Of Hutch'"Xon 320 234 4240 P_03 ® I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica- tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.' I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the — Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant ordinance No. 673 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex- ceeding 5500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Signature of Applicd t is r1 U • No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required picture. OFFICE USE nn� POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION; C /O - Y -Zoe O MD 10/05/00 11:19 FAX 402 289 3511 TAP ENTEPRISES Q003 oec -02 -99 09 :47A City of Hutchinson 320 234 4240 P_03 • I hereby certify I have completely filled out the entire above applica- tion and that the application is true, correct, and accurate.* I fully understand that any person who violates any provision of the Peddlers, Solicitors, and Transient Merchant Ordinance No. 673 is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not ex- ceeding 5500 or by imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in either case, the costs of prosecution. Signature of Applicirnt tete • No application will be forwarded to the City Council unless received one week prior to the regular Council meeting completely filled out with required picture. OFFICE USE POLICE CHIEF RECOMMENDATION; • -3- 10/05/00 11:19 FAX. 402 289 3511 TAP ENTEPRISES Q004 oac -02 -SS 09 :47A City oT Hutchinson 320 234 4240 P_04 RELEASE OF INFORMATION • As an applicant for a Pdddlers / lit /Transit-le `!erc.Nanrs Liainse from the city of Hutchinson, Minnesota, I am required to furnish i nforma tion which Cha; ae ar.c-: tea,. use in determining my moral, phvsical, Rr:1ra1 and fina_�c: al ricns. In this connection, I hereby expressly authorize release of any and all i - fo r_s[ion Which you cav have concerning me, including information of a con:ident___ or privileged nature. I hereby release the agency With Which I am seeking application for license, and any organization, company or person furnishing information to that agency as exz resslf authorized above, from ano liability for da=age Which c8v result from furnishing the infor=tion requested. Applicant's Foil Printed Vasa: Applicant's Address; tree ty Applicant's Birth Date: Applicant's Place of Birth: Late A Applicant's Social Security No.: Applicant's Driver's License t:o.: Appiicasz'"ignature • CITY OF HUTCHINSON PLANNING STAFF REPORT • To: City Council Prepared By: Julie Wischnack, AICP, Director of Planning/Zoning/Building Date: October 6, 2000 — Meeting Date October 10, 2000 Applicant: Frank Fay, representative of the property owners Re: Annexation request near Highway 7 and Highway 22 Neighborhood Meeting Staff held an additional neighborhood meeting to discuss the issues of annexation in the Highway 7 East area. The minutes of the meeting are attached. There were no new issues raised at the meeting. The discussion of utility services, timing and costs were discussed. Draft Joint Resolution The City Council requested that staff meet with the Township and their Attorney to arrive • at a mutually agreeable joint resolution document. Some of the minor issues in the document were resolved, although there is still a larger issue that remains unresolved. Tbeissue is the timing of annexation for the remaining parcels. The City Attorney is recommending not committing to a specific time frame within the document because of the potential problems that may create: construction of utilities; lack of assessable properties; individual annexation requests, etc. 40 / -A, Fay Annexation City Council Meeting — October 10, 2000 Page 2 Possible Course of Action The City received multiple time extensions from the Office of Boundary Adjustments. State Planning. If the City does not act on the annexation by October 13. 2000, the State will assign a procedure for what would be deemed a "disputed annexation'. The State uses two types of procedures to assist in deciding these matters: mediation and arbitration. Both services are paid for by the parties involved, the City and Township. The mediation process is less costly. The arbitration process involves an administrative law judge. Staff feels they have adequately attempted to come to an agreement with the Township. While staff understands the concern for the non - annexed land and timing of its inclusion into the City, staff must recommend what they believe is in the best interest of the City. That recommendation would be to not commit to a certain time frame within the joint resolution document. The mediation/arbitration process will be assigned automatically by the State after October 13, 2000, unless the City Council denies the annexation. Cc: Frank Fay Donna Wahl, Hutchinson Township Clerk Michael Couri, Attorney for Hutchinson Township 7-74, • Outline for neighborhood meeting Highway 7 East — Annexation proposal September 7, 2000 — 5: 00 p.m. 1. Overview of actions taken on the annexation 2. Overview of major issues: a. Staged Growth Plan b. Land Use Plan — Highway 22 Bypass Plan C. Joint Resolution Document d. Sewer costs and timing e. Water costs and timing f Other improvements (streets, storm sewer, etc.) 3. Review of decision date for the City Council - September 26, 2000 /-Al MINUTES • HWY 7 EAST NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Thursday, September, 2000 5:00 P.M. Hutchinson City Council Chambers Staff Present: Julie Wischnack, John Rodeberg, Holly Kreft and Richard Scieffer Also Present: Mike Couri, Donna Wahl, Jon Christensen, Terry Davis, Fred Seltz, Frank Fay, Tom Palmby, Sam Montgomery, Clay Montgomery, Bill and Gayle Christensen, Bob Wiehr, Craig Schmeling and Jim Heikes Ms. Wischnack gave a history of the project and the current status. She stated that the project had began in 1996. She added that the current petition had been denied by the township and that the township and city were attempting to draft a joint resolution. Mr. Rodeberg explained the utility costs and timing. He stated that although the City could provide water in the near future, but that sewer would not be available until the demand and assessable properties would be present. Ms. Wischnack discussed the pros and cons including the control by the City to enforce the • UBC and the costs associated with the improvements. Bob V uehr questioned why the township had originally approved the annexation with the condition that the properties to the east of the annexed area not be annexed for 7 years and then had changed it to 15 years. Mike Couri, the township attorney, stated that the error was made by him and that the township had intended 'to have 7 years as the timeframe. Mr. Schieffer stated that the wording currently implies that the City will have to provide services to the annexed areas. He had that this was not feasible because the properties could not afforded the potential assessments. He added that there were three options at this point: 1. No annexation would occur at this time; 2. The City and township could come to an agreement for a joint resolution; or 3. The City could approve the annexation of the eastern properties and not the western properties. If the township then denied the annexation request, the petition could be withdrawn or contested. Ms. Wischnack informed the audience that the City Council would need to make a decision prior to the October 13, 2000 deadline given by the Office of Boundary Adjustments. 7_ A [Mbank. Real Estate Asset Management P.O. Box 64142 St. Paul„MN 551640142 September 15, 2000 Ms. Julie Wischnack City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street Hutchinson, MN 55350 RE: Ag Systems Property 1180 Highway 7 E. Hutchinson, MN Dear Ms. Wischnack: U.S. Bank represents the Dick Lenz Trust, which owns three parcels along Highway 7. The property identification numbers are 080321100, 080321200 and 120230600. These parcels are currently leased to Ag Systems. The purpose of this letter is to explain opposition to the potential annexation of these parcels by the City of Hutchinson. It is my understanding that the City is co,nWmplating annexation in order to accommodate development of land at the new bypass. Annexation will provide no benefit to these parcels, while increasing costs considerably. The attendant extension of a water line to our property has no incremental benefit to the parcels or our tenant. Also, the annexation will increase real estate taxes, which costs are passed through to our tenants. Additionally, this type of leapfrog annexation and extension of services is unwise from a planning perspective. It sets a complicated and potentially expensive precedent for future development within the city. Please pass my concerns along to the appropriate City staff and elected officials. Regards, 4' 0(Z-'� Mike O'Rourke Cc: Craig Lenz, Ag Systems f7—Al 0 AGREEMENT This agreement is made and entered into this Is t day of August, 2000, by and between Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. (HCVN) and the City of Hutchinson, a Minnesota municipal corporation. RECITALS 1. Hutchinson Community Video Network, Inc. (HCVN) is a non -profit Minnesota corporation organized and operating for the purpose of providing public access television services to residents of the Hutchinson area; • 2. -14CVN seeks from the City of Hutchinson the right to locate a non - penetrating rooftop antenna assembly for the purpose of receiving signals from Minnesota Satellite and Technology, an organization formed by the Minnesota House of Representatives and the Minnesota Senate, which signals will allow Hutchinson residents to observe legislative floor debate, committee meetings and other public service oriented pro gramming ; 3. The City of Hutchinson is willing to accommodate the regriest of HCVN to locate an antenna assembly on city property subject to the terms of this agreement. • ,7-4 NOWTHEREFORE IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Grant of Permission. The city hereby grants to HCVN the right to locate a digital KU reception antenna along with a General Instruments 5200V IRD unit, along with associated supporting technology, on the roof of the Hutchinson City Center. 2. Conditions Associated with Grant of Permission. Both parties agree that all equipment associated with this agreement located on the roof of the city center shall be non - penetrating in character and that the City of Hutchinson assumes no risk or liability with the installation or maintenance of any of the equipment placed by HCVN on the roof of the city center. All • — expenses and work associated with installation of the equipment shall be the responsibility of HCVN or is assignee. 3. Duration of Agreement. Placement of the non - penetrating rooftop antenna unit and associated equipment, if any, shall not be considered permanent or semi - permanent in character and shall be removed by HCVN within ten (10) days following written notice by the city to HCVN. Both parties acknowledge and agree that the city shall at all times maintain full control of its premises and the decision as to whether or not the equipment which is the subject of this agreement r emains on the roof of the city center is a decision which rests with the city alone and the city shall have • 0 • full discretion at all times to decide in its sole and unfettered judgment as to whether or not said equipment remains on the roof of the city center building. 4. Amendment. All amendments to this agreement must be in writing and executed by the parties in order to bind any parry in any way. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this document the year and date first above written. THE CITY OF HUTCB3NSON By Marlin Torgerson Its Mayor Gary D. Plotz Its City Administra» or ATTEST: By HUTCHINSON COMMUNITY VIDEO NETWORK, INC. By G. Barry Anderson Its President • C • Hutchinson Citv Center Ill Hassan mmt SE Hutchinson. .YIN 55350.2522 320- 587.5151/Far 320-234-4240 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John P. Rodeberg, Director of Engineering/?ublic Works RE: Consideration of Consulting Contracts with Earth Tech 1. Construction Related Services for South Area Trunk — Phase 1 (Letting No. 1/Project No. 1) 2. WTP (Water Treatment Plant) Design ReportfWell Head Protection Planning DATE: October 5. 2000 Attached are copies of the above referenced project Consulting Contracts. 1. Construction Related Services/South Area Trunk Sewer - Phase 1 Time and materials contract with a "not -to- exceed" figure of 5143,000. It is our intent to complete a portion of the inspection services and coordinate the construction staking through SEH. 2. Water Treatment Plant DesigwWell Head Protection Page 5 of the report outlines the scope of the project, which generally includes planning and review for future improvements to the Water Treatment Plant. This is proposed as a Lump Sum contract of 563,900. The Preliminary Wellhead Protection Plan is proposed to be completed in conjunction with this work. This is proposed as a Lump Sum of $4,500 cc: Randy DeVries— Director of Water /WasrewateriResource Recovery Dick Nagy — Water Svsterns Supervisor t Pnnad oo rsycled paper - September 26. 2000 John Rodeberg, Director Engineering and Public Works City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson. MN 55350 -2522 Re: Draft Engineering Services Agreement Construction Related Services South Area Trunk Sewer, Phase I Dear Mr. Rodeberg: We have prepared the attached, draft agreement for your review and comment to expedite project progress. Until we receive firm quotations for the construction stakine services, we have included an allowance for the task in this draft document. As proposed, this agreement provides the City with one, full -time on -site project representative to oversee this project. as well as the composting projects, biosolids project and McDonalds Lift Station project. per our previous discussions with you, Randy DeVries and Gary Plotz. The total cost of engineering services for this project, from inception through project close -out equals about 20 of the as -bid construction cost. Please renew the attached document and let me know if any revisions are desired. Upon receipt of final quotations for the construction staking, we will finalize the agreement and forward it for your action. Very truly yours, E ch. Inc colt L. }C g, P Principal enc: Draft Agreement cc: Randy DeVries, Director of Water /Wastewater Operations LADau`C mWHutchinw \CRS Dmft Agreement Tree Ull • E A R R T T H= J J T E C ,� "74. 4J CONSULTING AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED This Agreement between EARTH TECH. Inc. a California comoranon. ( Farm Tech ") with offices at ?033 Campus Drive North. Suite I - Minneapolis. Minnesota 55441. and Ciry of Hutchinson ("CLIENT"), tin off at l 11 Hassan Street SE. Hutchinson. MN 5350 -2:22. l . Earth Tech agrees to perform the services described in Appendix A ( "SERVICES'). CLIENT authorizes Earth Tech to perform these SERVICES for the following project and location: Construction Related Services - South Area Trunk Sewer. Phase 1. Hutchinson. Minnesota. 3. Earth Tech is willing to perform the SERVICES in exchange for the following fee: CLIENT will pay on a time and Material basis, with an estimated maximum cost of 5143.200. Earth Tech will invoice monthly. 4. Billing: Earth Tech will submit invoices to CLIENT monthly. CLIENT recognizes that timely payment is a material part of this Agreement. Each invoice is due and payable within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the invoice. CLIENT will pay an additional charge of one and one -half percent (1 5 percent) per month not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law for any payment received by Earth Tech more than thirty ( hi30) calendar days from the date of the invoice. CLIENT will pay when due that portion of invoice. if any, not m dispute. If CLIENT fails to pay any undisputed invoiced amounts within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the invoice, Earth Tech may suspend its performance or terminate this Agreement without incurring any liability to CLIENT and without waiving anv other claim against CLIENT. Speciai Provisions: NONE ATTACHMENT 6. CLIENT RECOGNIZES THAT THE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OR POLLUTION ON OR BENEATH THE SLTIFACE OF A SITE MAY CREATE RISKS AND LIABILITMS. CONSULTANT HAS NEITHER CREATED NOR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS POLLUTION. CONSEQUENTLY, CLIENT RECOGNIZES THIS AGREEMENT WILL ACCORDINGLY LIMIT CONSULTANT'S LIABILITY. CLIENT confirms reading this document in full (including the terms 7 through 1S on the following page). This Agreement when executed by Eart4,Tech is an offer to perform the SERVICES. open for acceptance within 30 days. This Agreement becomes effective on the date CLIENT signs below: CLIENT - CITY OF HUTCHINSON. NIN L� Gary Plotz Title: Administrator Date: Earth Tech - EARTH TECH, Inc. By: Scott L. Young Title: Section Manager Date: Is ^^'' E A R T H = ) T C 14 n tyoa u.rzru.,rp 1 o Ca l ?- Standard of Care Earth Tech will perform the SERVICES in accordance with the standards of care and diligence normally practiced by consulting Firms perforining services of a simtiar nature in the same locale. S. Indemnity / limitation of Liability Subject to anv limitations stated in this Agreement. Earth Tech will indemnify and hold harmless CLIENT, its officers, directors. empiovees, and subcontractors, from and against all claims and actions. including reasonable attorneys fees, arising out of is damages or injuries to persons or tangible property ro the extent they are caused by a professionally negligent act, error, or omssmn of Earth Tech or any of its agents. subcontracors. or employees in the performance of SERVICES under this Agreement. Earth Tech will not be responsible for any loss, damage, or liability arising 8om any contributing negligent acts by CLIEN7, its subcontractors, agents, staff. or consuitants. Neither pan will be responsible to the other for consequential damages including, but not luruted to, loss of profit, loss of investrnent or business interruption. The CLIENT also agrees to seek recourse only against Earth Tech and not agatrsi its officers, employee& directors, or shareholders. The CLIENT agrees to limit Earth Tech's liability due to breach of contract. warranty or megiigent acts, errors or omissions of Earth Tech to 550.000 or the fee paid to Earth Tech under ihis.lgreement. whichever is greater. 9. Insurance: During the period that SERVICES are performed under this Agreement Earth Tech will maintain the following insurance ( 1) Workers' Compensation coverage in accordance with the laws of the states having lunsdiction over its emplovees engaged in the SERVICES and Employer's Liability Insurance I [unit of 5500.000 each occurrence.): (2) Commercial General Liability Policy with a limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence and a 52,000,000 aggregate; (3) Cominrercial Automobile Liability wtth a limit of S500.000 per occurrence and a $1,000.000 aggregate; and (4) Professional Liability coverage with a S500,000 limit on each claim and a S 1,000,000 aggregate. CLIENT agrees Earth Tech will not be liable for am Ion, damage, or liability arising our of this Agreement beyond the coverage and conditions of such inururarice with limits as stated above. 10. Hazardous SubstancevAaurdous Waste: CLIENT represents that if CLIENT knows or has reason to suspect that hazardous substances or pollution may exist at the project site, CLIENT has fully informed Earth Tech. In the event Earth Tech encounters hazardous subsum s or contamination significantly beyond that originally represented by CLIENT. Earth Tech may suspend its SERVICES and enter into good faith renegotiation of this Agreement. CLIENT acknowledges that Earth Tech has no responsibility as a generator, treater, starer, or disposer of hazardous or toxic substances found or identified at a site and CLIENT agrees to defend. mdernmfv, and hold harmless Earth Tech, from any clam or liability, arising out of Earth Tech's ocrtormance of work under this Agreement and made or brought against Earth Tech for anv actual or threatened environmental pollution or contamination except to the extent that Earth Tech has negligently caused or contributed to any such pollution or contamination. This indemnification includes reasonable attorney fees and expenses insured by Earth Tech in defense of such claim. 11. Sample Ownership: All samples and cuttings of materials containing hazardous contaminants are the property and responsibility of CLIENT. Removal of cuttings from the project site will remain the obligation of CLIENT. Absent direction from CLIENT, Earth Tech may return all contaminated samples and laboratory byproducts to the CLIENT for proper disposal or treamm t. 12. Buried Utilities: In those situations where Earth Tech perfornts subsurface exploration. CLIENT, to the extent of its knowledge, will furnish tole Earth Tech infoyakiinon identifying the type and location of utilities and other mean -made objects beneath the surface of the project sits Earth Tech will take reasoriabir precautions to avoid damaging these utilities or objects. Prior to penetrating the site's surface. Earth Tech will furntah CLIENT a plan indicating the locations intended for penetration. CLIENT will approve the location of these penetrations and authorize Earth Tech to proceed. t 3. Documents and Records: CLIENT acknowledges that Earth Tech's reports, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data. calculations, estimates and other similar documents ( "Records ") are instruments of professional service, not products. All data Earth Tech prepares for CLIENT under this Agreement wtll remau the property of Earth Tech. CLIENT will not use any Earth Tech data or report for any purpose other than its original purpose as defined in the PROPOSAL CLIENT has no rights to moormiee or pamal data. Earth Tech will retain these Records for a period of three (3) years following completion of this project. Dunng this time, Earth Tech will reasonably make available the records to the CLIENT. Earth Tech may charge a reasonable fee in addition to its professional fees for retrieving or copying such records. 14. Change Orders: Earth Tech will treat as a change order any wnnen or oral order (including directions, instructions, merpre ons or detemmnations) from CLIENT which request changes in the SERVICES. Earth Tech will give CLIENT notice within ten (10) days of the change order of any resulting increase in fee. Unless CLIENT objects in writing within five (5) days, the change order becomes a part of this Agreement 15. Thi Rights: Except as specifically stated in this Agreement, this Agreement does not create any rights or benefits to parties other than CLIENT and Earth Tech. 16. Assignment/ Status: The CLIENT will not delegate, assign, sublet, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the wittiest consent of Earth Tech. Earth Tech is an independent consultant and not the agent or employee of CLIENT. 17. Termination: Either party my terminate the SERVICES with or wuhout cause upon ten (10) days advance written notice. If CLIENT terminates without cause, CLIENT will pay Earth Tech costs incurred, noncancellable commitments, and fees earned to the date of termination and through demobilization, including any cancellation charges of vendors and subcontractors. 18. Complete Agreement The Parties acknowledge this Agreement, including the Proposal and any Attachments consmane the entire Agreement between them Unless stated otherwise in this Agrcertren, this Agreement may not be modified exce{x in a writing signed by both parties. The periaeo agree that California law governs this Agreement and any dispute involving the Agreement EADat&�Micnts\Hutchu ou,CRS Proposal -Phan 1 Trunk Sewer APPENDIX A • SCOPE OF SERVICES CONSTRUCTION RELATED SERVICES -SOUTH AREA TRUNK SEWER. PHASE I CITY OF HUTCHLNSON. MINNESOTA A. BACKGROUND The City of Hutchinson is constructing trunk sanitary sewer Improvements for which construction related services are required. This proposal addresses those services. which are based upon an eight month. or 35 week. construction contract B. SCOPE SERVICES to be provided for the project are as follows: Contract Administration, including: a. Coordination of Contractor and Owner questions. issuance of field directives and change orders, and project closeout. b. Attendance at monthly construction meetings by project manager /engineer. c. Review and approval of Contractor pay requests, with recommendation to the Owner. The cost of this task is based upon an average of 4 houmweek for coordination, 8 hoursimonth for • meetings, 2 hours per month for pay requests and 40 hours for project closeout, including record drawings, final inspection, and payments processing. 2. Construction Oversight, including: a. On -site Project Representative to assure that the work substantially complies with the Contract Documents. b. Construction staking The cost of this task is based upon 1.000 total hours. which includes 30 hours per week for the contract period. Construction staking is a sub - contract to SEH. Inc to maintain coordination with the Phase 2 portion of the project. 3. Shop drawing review for the lift station, including electrical, I &C, structural and mechanical components. 4. O&M and Start-up Services, including; a. Review and approval of standard, manufacturer O&M materials. b. Preparation of O &M Manual for Owner operations staff. c. Assistance with start -up of equipment and training of Owner staff. • r'4-( -f Page 1 oft E:\MMIC1i gi,whmma'CKS ProponW%W I Tank Sews ADDITIONAL SERVICES may be provided, as authorized by the Client: Other services as authorized by the Client. C. SCHEDULE Contract schedule incorporates construction activities from October 2000 through May 2000 to include project close -out activities. D. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES CLIENT, at its expense. shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the SERVICES: 1. Information/Reports Furnish Earth Tech the following information, reports, and drawings, all of which Earth Tech can rely upon without independent verification in performing the SERVICES: 2. Decisions Provide all criteria and full information as to CLIENT requirements for the project, attend project - related meetings, provide interim reviews onan agreed -upon schedule, make decisions on project alternatives. and generally participate in the project to the extent necessary to allow Earth Tech to perform SERVICES. • E. FE . The total cost for SERVICES associated with this Agreement shall not exceed S 143,200 without the prior, written approval of the Client. The breakdown of fees, for informational purposes only, includes: Task/Description Cost Construction Administration 530,500 Coordination/Closeout $17,200 Monthly Meetings $10,500 Pay Requests $2,800 Construction Oversight $99,000 On -Site Project Representative 1 $87,000 Staking Services 1 $12,000 Shop Drawings $5,700 O &M Mannal/Start-up $8,000 Total Estimated Cost $143,200 Page 2 of 2 E1D"Chvnr&Jatrilwm'CRS Pnopm k4%=1 Tnmk Sera 0 • RECEIVED September 25, 2000 John Rodeberg, Director Engineering & Public Works City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Re: Engineering Services Proposals WTP Design Report & Well Head Protection Dear W. Rodeberg: Last week you notified me that you had not yet received the referenced proposals. The original transmittal was dated September 6" and mailed on September 7'", so I am uncertain as to their fate. I have checked with both Randy DeVnes and Dick Nagy to see if they have received the documents. Since they haven't. I can only assume some error on this end for which you have my apologies. Enclosed`vou will find copies of the documents for your review and action. as appropriate. Again, my apologies for the delay in your receipt of this information. Very truly yours, Earth ch, Inc. �] colt L. Yo P.E �= Principal L� enc: WTP Design Report Proposal Well Head Protection Plan Proposal cc: Randy DeVries, Director of Water/Wastewater Operations Dick Nagy, Water System Supervisor CITY OF H UTCH1NS L:' ,Data \C l ients\Hutchin onTmposal Re -uan =ml E H T E C H Y-A'-(�z) A03 Campus Drive North. Suite 1 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55441 September 6, 2000 John Rodeberg, Director Engineering & Public Works City of Hutchinson 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 -2522 Re: Revised Engineering Services Proposals WTP Design Report Well Head Protection Planning Dear Mr. Rodeberg: We have revised our proposal for the WTP Design Report based upon our telephone conversation of August 25, 2000. Per your request, we have also included a proposal for developing the preliminary Well Head Protection (WHP) Plan for the City of Hutchinson. Telephone: 612- s5i.1oo, Based upon our telephone conference, we have tightened up the scope of services for the WTP Design Report and reduced the cost from $73,900 to $63,900. A detailed project F . c s i m i l e schedule has also been enclosed for your review and approval. G 1 x.551. a 499: The estimated cost to complete the preliminary WHP Plan is $4,500 based upon the enclosed scope of services. This effort will provide the City with the necessary background work to - • initiate the WHP Plan and implement the long -term protection measures required for your water.supply. We look forward to assisting the City of Hutchinson with these important projects. If the proposals are acceptable, please sign the documents and return one copy to our office. The second copy is for you records. Please let me know if you need any additional information regarding these proposals. Very truly yours, ech,Inc. � I 4 tt L o E. Principal enc: WTP Design Report Proposal (Revised) Well Head Protection Plan Proposal cc: Randy DeVries, Director of Water/Wastewater Operations Dick Nagy, Water System Supervisor E:Upat ),Uients51rutehinsor11W7P & Well Had Propo als Irmnsnitul E A R T H `) T E C H . h� NRWai1CMY l]G ed..M• � -A -Cz CONSULTING AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED 'his Agreement bemeen EARTH TECH. Inc, a California corporation. ( "Earth Tech ") with offices at 3033 Campus Drive North, suite 175, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441, and City of Hutchinson t "CLIENT "), with offices at 111 Hassan Street SE, Hutchinson, MN 5350 -2522. Earth Tech agrees to perform the services described in Appendix A ( "SERVICES "). _. CLIENT authorizes Earth Tech to perform these SERVICES for the following project and location: Water Treatment Study, Hutchinson, Minnesota. Earth Tech is willing to perform the SERVICES in exchange for the following fee: CLIENT will pay a lump sum of $63,900. Earth Tech will invoice monthly on a percent complete basis. 4. Billing: Earth Tech will submit invoices to CLIENT monthly. CLIENT recognizes that timely payment is a material part of this Agreement Each invoice is due and payable within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the invoice. CLIENT will pay an additional charge of one and one -half percent (1.5 percent) per month not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law for any payment received by Earth Tech more than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the invoice. CLIENT will pay when due that portion of invoice, if anv, not in dispute. If CLIENT fails to pay any undisputed invoiced amounts within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the invoice, Earth Tech may suspend its perfo or terminate this Agreement without incurring any liability to CLIENT and without waiving any other claim against CLIENT. :. Special Provisions: NONE ATTACHMENT 6 CLIENT REC0GNLZ S THAT THE PRESENCE OF HAZARDOUS MA TERIALS OR POLLUTION ON OR BENEATH THE SURFACE OF A SITE MAY CREATE RISKS AND LIABILITIES. CONSULTANT HAS NEITHER CREATED NOR CONTRIBUTED TO THIS POLLUTION. CONSEQUENTLY, CLIENT RECOGNIZES THIS AGREEMENT WELL .ACCORDINGLY LIMIT CONSULTANT'S LIABILITY. CLIENT confirms reading this document in full (including the terms 7 through 18 on the following page). This Agreement when •executed by Earth Tech is an offer to perform the SERVICES, open for acceptance within 30 days. This Agreement becomes effective on the date CLIENT signs below: CLIENT - CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MN Earth Tech - E H TECH, a By: S L. Yotmg Title: Section Manazer Date: Gary Plotz Title: Administrator Date: • E A R T H ` 1 T E C Atym �u � H 9 — A — 62/ I Standard of Care: Earth Tech will perform the SERVICES in accordance with the standards of care and diligence normally practiced by consulting firms periomdng services of a similar nature in the same iocale. S. Indemnity! limitation of LlabiEty: Subject to anv lunitations stated in this Agreement, Earth Tech will indemnity and hold harmless CLIENT, its officers, directors, employees, and subcontractors. from and against all claims and actions, including reasonable attorneys fees, [rising out of damages or mimes to persons or tangible property to the extent they are caused by a professionally negligent act, error, or emission of Earth Tech or any of its agents, subcontractors, or employees in the performance of SERVICES tinder this Agreement Earth Tech will not be responsible for any loss. damage, or liability arising from any contributing negligent acts by CLIENT, its subcontractors, agents, staff, or consultants. Neither party will be responsible to the other for consequential damages including, bur not limited to, loss of profit, loss of investment or business interruption The CLIENT also agrees to seek remorse only against Earth Tech and not against its officers, employees, directors, or shareholders. The CL=agrea to limit Earth Tech's liability due to breach of contract, warranty or negligent acts, errors or omissions of Earth Tech to $50,000 or the fee paid to Earth Tech under this Agreement, whichever it greater. 9. Insurance During the period that SERVICES are performed under this Agreement, Earth Tech will maintain the following insurance: (1) Worked Compensation coverage in accordance with the laws of the states having jurisdiction over its employees engaged in the SERVICES and Employer's Liability Insurance (limit of $500,000 each occurrence.); (2) Commercial General Liability Policy with a limit of 51,000,000 per occurrence and ■ $2,000,000 aggregate; (3) Commercial Automobile Liability with a lira[ of $500,000 per occurrence and a S 1,000,000 aggregate; and (4) Prolessiorial Liability coverage with a 5500,000 lin ut on each claim and a $1,000,000 aggregate. CLEW agrees Earth Tech will not be liable for any lath, damage, or liability arising our of this Agreemew beyond the coverage and conditions of such inmearwe with limits as stated above. 10. Hazardous SubstancewHaardoas Waste: CLIENT represents that if CLIENT Ivtows or has reason to suspect that hazardous substances or pollution may exist at the project site, CLIENT has fully informed Earth Tech. In the event Earth Tech encounters hazardous nrbatancta or comarnmanon significantly beyond that originally represented by CLIENT, Earth Tech may suspend its SERVICES and enter into gored faith renegotiation of this Agreernent CLIENT acknowledges that Earth Tech has no responsibility as a generator, treater, starer, or disposer of hazardous or toxic substances found or identified at a site and CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Earth Tech, from any claim or liability, arising out of Earth Tech's performance of work under this Agreement and made or brought against Earth Tech for any actual or threatened environmental pollution or con taminati on except to the extent that Earth Tech has negligently caused or contributed to my such pollution or contamination. This indermificamon includes reasonable attorney fees and expenses incurred by Earth Tech in defense of such claim. 11. Sample Ownership: All samples and cuttings of materials containing hazardous contaminants are the property and responsibility of CLIENT. Removal of cuttings from the project site will remain the obligation of CLIENT. Absent direction from CLIENT, Earth Tech may return all contaminated samples and laboratory byproducts to the CLIENT for proper disposal or ttttnneriL 12. Buried Utilities: In those situations where Earth Tech performs subsurface exploration, CLIENT, to the extent of its knowledge, will flattish to • Earth Tech information identifying the type and location of utilities and other man -made objects beneath the surface of the project site. Earth Tech will take ressonablaprecautions to avoid damaging these utilities or objects. Prior to penetrating the site's surface, Earth Tech will furnish CLIENT a plat indicating fheToeations intended for penetration. CLIENT will approve the location of these petictrmom and authorize Earth Tech to proceed 13. Documents and Records: CLIENT acknowledges that Earth Tech's repels, boring logs, field data, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates and other similar dorwnents ('Records ") are instruments of professional service, not products. All data Earth Tech prepares for CLIENT under this Agreement will remain the property of Earth Tech. CLIENT will not use any Earth Tech data or report for any purpose other dim its original purpose as defined in the PROPOSAL CLIENT has no rights to incomplete or partial data. Earth Tech will retain these Records for a period of three (3) years following completion of this project. During this time, Earth Tech will reasonably make available the records to the CLIENT. Earth Tech may charge a reasonable fee in addition to its professional fees for retrieving or copying such records. 14. Change Orders. Earth Tech will treat as a change order any written or oral order (including directions, instructions, interpretations or determinations) from CLMNT which request changes in the SERVICES. Earth Tech will give CLIENT notice within tin (10) days of the doge order of any resulting increase in fee. Unless CLIENT objects in writing within five (5) days, the change order becomes a part of this AgreemeaL 15. Tblyd -Party Rights: Except as specifically stated in this Agreement, this Agreement does not create any rights or benefits to parties other than CLIENT and Earth Tech. 16. Assignment/ Status: The CLIENT will not delegate, assign, sublet, or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the written consent of Path Tech. Earth Tech is an independent consultant and not the agent or employee of CLIENT. 17. Termination: Either party may terminate the SERVICES with or without come upon ten (10) days advance written notice. If CLIENT temninatsa without cause, CLIENT will pay Earth Tech toss incurred, noneanceklabke commitments, and fees earned to the date of termination and through demobilization, including any cancellation charges of vendors and subcontractors. 18. Complete Agtaeme•C The Portia acknowledge this Agreement, including rho Proposal and any Attachments con stitute the ewe Agreement between there Unless stated otherwise in this Agreement, this Agreement may not be modified except in a writing signed by both Ptnrtiea The Penes agree that California Jaw governs this Agreemernt and any dispute involving the Agreement • E1Da41C1iesuWuehimanlWlP D=W Report Proposal Revd E 11 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF SERVICES WATER TREATMENT STUDY CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA A. BACKGROUND Earth Tech has previously reported the results of investigations of water quality issues related to excessive chlorine demands and copper corrosion rates. It has been identified that these conditions are primarily related to the elevated ammonia concentrations and high alkalinity of the source water. The source water also has high concentrations of iron that is currently removed by aeration and gravity filtration treatment_ Several water treatment alternatives have been identified to potentially meet longterm treatment goals. However, a more complete analysis of factors impacting water treatment needs is necessary including future growth in residential and industrial development, regulations, water supply and storage, land availability for expansion of water treatment facilities, water quality goals, and treatment costs. This study evaluates the factors impacting treatment decisions and provides recommendations, costs, and a design basis for the two best long -term water treatment alternatives for the City of Hutchinson- B. SCOPE SERVICES to be provided for the project are as follows: Task 1 — Population and Growth Projections Obtain population and community growth projections from CLIENT. 2. Estimate future industrial and business growth estimates over a 20 -year planning period. Task 2 - Water Needs Analvsis 1. Obtain consumption and pumping data, and customer demand characteristics from CLIENT. 2. Recommend peak demand ratios that should be used for planning purposes. 3. Estimate future consumption and pumpage requirements, and quantify projections by major customer classification. 4. Recommend fire flow requirements or ranges to be used for planning purposes. 5. Provide supply and storage recommendations for current, 5 -year, and 20 -year time increments. F \DMCb= "utl =anWTP Drip A *PM Pnayod Pale i of s Task 3 - SDWA Compliance Audit • 1. Perform a Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Compliance Audit. This audit will consist of an analysis of the potential impacts of current or proposed future national drinking water regulations on utility operations or future water treatment requirements. Task 4 - Nitrogen Source Analysis 1. Interview government officials regarding nitrate and ammonia occurrence in groundwater in the Hutchinson region, and identify potential sources of nitrate and ammonia loading in the water supply aquifer. 2. Provide technical assistance for a sampling and testing program to determine the seasonal variability and impact of pumpage on ammonia and nitrate occurrence in the water supply wells. 3. Provide a summary of nitrogen source analysis findings and the impact on water supply and treatment. Task 5 - Water Quality and Treatment Analysis I . Tabulate and review available historical water quality data for existing wells. 2. Perform a desktop analysis of Total Trihalomenthane concentrations for up to four treatment alternatives. 3. Provide technical support for sample collection and laboratory analysis for the determination of I. ,,Total Trihalomenthane formation potential. 4. Perform a desktop analysis of anticipated copper corrosion rates based on the final water quality conditions of the four treatment alternatives. 5. S ummarize the impact of wastewater copper issues, and identify a target copper loading rate allowing for acceptable copper discharge to wastewater treatment facilities. Task 6 - Alternative Water Treatment Site Analysis 1. Provide trapping of the existing water treatment site including topography and facilities. Identify the available areas for future water supply wells and water treatment facilities. 2. Identify space needs for the administration and operation of the water system. 3. Identify site requirements for water supply, storage and treatment requirements. 4. Assist the City in identifying additional sites for future water facilities. Provide a site map, in AutoCADD 14, to the City for future use. Pale 2 of 5 E�DW Wif ramp Rq— Fmpoad ae.sed Task 7 - Treatment Performance Evaluation Evaluate up to four treatment alternatives for addressing future water treatment goals. This task includes engineering evaluations and coordination of bench testing with equipment manufacturers. Should pilot testing be recommended and/or required, additional services would be necessary. The four preliminary treatment alternatives identified include: 1. Lime Softening 2. Membrane Filtration 3. Biological Nitrification Treatment 4. Electrodialysis Removal (EDR) Provide a summary of the evaluation to identify the two best treatment alternatives. Task 8 - Design Concepts For the two best treatment alternatives prepare: 1. Process flow diagrams 2. Facilities layout and sizing diagrams 3. Conceptual diagrams for primary treatment processes including but not limited to processes such as sedimentation, softening, filtration, chemical facilities, waste handling and disposal, and water storage. TME9 - Water Treatment Cost Analysis For the two best treatment alternatives, prepare cost estimates of 1. Construction and contingencies 2. Engineering and administrative 3. Land acquisition 4. Electrical pumping costs 5. Chemical usage 6. Waste disposal 7. O&M materials and labor Task 10 -Study Report 1. Prepare a draft study report including the following discussion and related documentation: a. Study objectives b. Planning estimates, assumptions, and projections c. Present and future service area characteristics d. Existing deficiencies e. Findings and conclusions from analyses EtpyCh=&*WxWnmhWTP DwW&-Papan P. Rcvmd Pape 3 of 5 f. Recommended future improvements to supply, storage, and treatment g. Report exhibits showing existing conditions and proposed recommended improvements h. Future capital improvement plan 2. Forward five copies of the draft study report to the CLIENT for review. 3. Attend one meeting with the CLIENT to review the draft study report. 4. Incorporate comments from the draft review meeting. 5. Provide 15 copies of the final study report for the CLIENT's use and future reference. 6. Attend one meeting with the City Council to present the findings and recommendations of the final study report. C. SCHEDULE Based on an award date by October I, 2000, the schedule to complete the scope is estimated to be March 15, 2001. D. CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES CLIENT, at its expense, shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the SERVICES: • 1. Information/Reports Furnish Earth Tech the following information, reports, and drawings, all of which Faith Tech can rely upon without independent verification in performing the SERVICES: a. Copies of available reports, drawings, specifications, design, and operational data pertinent to the project. b. An up to date system map showing the locations and sizes of mains and water towers. c. Design and operating data for facilities such as well pump stations and storage reservoirs. d. Copies of latest MDH reports and correspondence regarding the water system. e. Planning information regarding current and futtne land use and development within and adjacent to the City. f The latest ISO rating survey. g. Collect and s ummarize the following data: 1) Historical water sales and pnmpage 2) Manufacturer's well pump curves Pap 4 of S F-Ji,d [bn&041MieoMW Deep Ropon Proposal Rewind • 2. System Access a. Provide access to all components of the existing water system u 3. Representative Designate a representative for the project who shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define CLIENMs policies, and make decisions with respect to the SERVICES. 4. Decisions E. FEES Provide all criteria and full information as to CLIENT requirements for the project, attend project - related meetings, provide interim reviews on an agreed -upon schedule, make decisions on project alternatives, and generally participate m the project to the extent necessary to allow Earth Tech to perform SERVICES. The total cost for SERVICES associated with this Agreement is $63,900. The breakdown of fees includes: Task Description Cost 1 Population and Growth Projections $2,400 2 Water Needs Analysis $3,100 3 SDWA Compliance Audit $1,500 4 Nitrogen Source Analysis $3,000 5 1 Water Quality and Treatment Analysis $4,400 6 Alternative Water Treatment Site Analysis $9,500 7 Treatment Performance Evaluation $12,000 8 Design Concepts $12,500 9 Water Treatment Cost Analysis $7,500 10 Study Report $8,000 Total $63,900 EOM1cbM&MWMkMMMMWTP De1P ROPM PmPaad Rwind Pala 5 of 5 n.trna. r.y.a.r Ia Yw '... p.y Eywg3 to e.n Viq.eM. 54., m a3. p.y Cy.cWn laa.n E..I. FNV. Dwwq. 5 Yn Sygryrslu.a wgwaw. 5 dry. C:1'PMw 50n SAtlAAUSa 5 d •.aryayw aovq M.!/.1. aldry. idwd pl.rp.l adq. to bn Pm.tl.TwA aaaw 45an ' atmiue: f1.erq. 13 bn Iwort.wr +.wry.t. �sM. .. ... INAQ ttM to Yn ' ToW rnu Er.FUWn 15 an CY(gM Ev.twb� 15e.n 30Yy. EnpYwMq 15 e.n '1 [gnV.eyn Oa.n , C*ga.n. ra a.p - M M.!/e.m is ay. is.aua 1501. eae n.Va..�+a 5Yn . alY(.Ingl.liwb SYn Mpn C� t3 ary. Pmu.. Fb. Cap.m. to e.n 1 +n.e 3 amen tol.n c.ueuwyr tsar ;' Coa ewnw 13 b ft*do Pat. Gp.1111.P:n loan ut w.... iaat. P1attYpl san � Xu1cM.en w!P C. an n.PY P-Js I3ew All subdivider's agreements will be available for the City Council on Tuesday, October 10, 2000 • • • 6. RESOLUTION NO. 11586 REVISED RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5037 LETTING NO. 41PROJECT NO. 00 -05 & 00 -06 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Project No. 00 -05 Jorgenson Street SE from Hassan Street SE to Century Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and Project No. 00 -06 Oak Lane SE, East of Jorgenson Street SE by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base. bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and and the bid price for such improvement is $377,941.50 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $90,705.96 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $468,647.46. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $201,4ee.57 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $267,178.89. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000 CJ Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11587 • RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5037 LETTING NO. 4 PROJECT NOS. 00 -05 & 00 -06 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of Project No. 00-05 Jorgenson Street SE from Hassan Street SE to Century Avenue SE by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and Project No. 00 -06 Oak Lane SE, East of Jorgenson Street SE by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period often (10) years, thifirst of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of _percent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31 st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged d the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor is City Administrator r N C BYI CR10E BY: CRICE ASSESSMFNTROL 7 LETT ING NO. 4MROJECT &88-86 0045; JORGENSON ST SE FROM HASSAN S'f SE TO CENTURY AVE SE 00 -06: OAK LN SE - EAST OF JORGENSON ST SE BYCONSTRU IONOTnORMSME R,MANITARYSEWMR&SERVICES.WATER MN&SKRVICE$ GRADIX GRAYELBAS CURB&OMT BIPINUX B SU ACIKC&APPURTENANCM f 3,91&75 f 5,225.00 S 868.62 SIVEPTCOSTPERUNI'1'- Oe'SEIA11OW STRFET COST' PER GNIT- F WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH CHEC® BY: 1 RODEBERG NUAB713t OF YEAR&: If f 737.18 SEWER SERVICE COST PER EACH ADOPTED: HIM/" f 557.62 DRIVEWAY COST PER UNIT D4TERIMT RATE: R� IM Ix HRH t.]I -OwtW 11a *MM ACCOWH NQ CRY MDXO XAML&A110RES7 OF ROPERTY OWXMe LEGAL DtiCRImm APMTI ORSUBWVIMION UNIT SIRMEr WATER SER VICK SEWER SERVICE VRI \'EW, \Y I01AI.ACPVE A MMEIIT COLN"RD XO. 1 06- 116 -29- 14-0010 lar,Ia N. Karl 15 S,4,-Low AVc SE 0 0 0 _ 15 Sddow Aw SE Lot 1, Block 2 23- 154.0170 HurchiOSon MN 55350 Selchow - o e n Subd. 0 f f S f $ 2 06-116 -29- 140020 Robert & Laura Wittn= 985jorymson St SE 1 1 1 925 lo St SE Lot 2 Block 2 $50 Credit 23.154.0120 Hutchinwn MN 55750 Selchow- o croon Subd. 1 f 3918.75 f 868.62 f 737.18 $ 507.62 $ 6,032.17 3 06. 116-29.14 -0030 lavenle Bred. 975 u enwn St SE 1 1 I 975 jomm n St SE I.ot 3 Block 2, $50 Cndil 23.154.0190 Hutchirtsoo MN 55350 Selchow -o croon SuW. I S 3918.75 f 868.62 f 737.18 f 507.62 f 6,032.17 4 116 -29- 140040 Warren & Elva Wendorff %5 jorgemon St SE 1 1 1 %5 lorKmtori St SE Lot 4 Block 23.154.0200 Browntnn MN 55312 Selchowjorgenwn S.W. 1 S 3918.75 f 868.62 f 737.18 S 557.62 S 6082.17 5 06- 116 -29. 14-0050 IAW r ce & Kmhryn LaLonde 955 lomcroon St SE 1 1 1 955 lorZamn St SE 1 M 5 Biwk 2 23.154.0210 Hutchiruon MN 55350 Secow- o croon S.6d. I f 3 $ 868.62 f 737.18 $ 557.61 f 6 6 116 - 29.14 -060 jer2Jd & Elizabeth - Friedrich 945 jorgtoon St SE 1 1 1 94 5 St SE Lot 6 Block 23.154.0220 Hurchiruon MN 55350 Selchow - o croon Subd, 1 $ 3 f 868 -62 f 737.18 S 557.62 $ 6,08217 7 06. 116 -29- 14-0070 Ger dd & Mildred Messner 935 lorg St SE 1 1 1 935 lo St SE Lot 7 Block 2 23.154.0230 Hutchiruon MN SS }50 Selchow - o enwn Subd. 1 f 3,918.75 f 868.62 $ 737,18 f 557.62 1 f 6 8 06. 116 -29- 14-0080 swe ensen 925 lorgomon St SE 1 1 1 925 jo St SE Lot 8 Block 23.154.0240 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd 1 S 3 f 868.62 $ 737.18 f 557.62 S 6 9 06- 116 -29. 140090 Muy K. White 936 Hnvatt St SE 0 0 0 936 HM Sc SE Lot 9 Block 23.154.0250 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow- o enson Subd. 0 f f f $ f 10 116 -29- 14-0180 Erland & Madurrna lablimki 1016 J.rr St SE 0 0 0 1016 St SE WI 10.1'of S50' of Lot 10 AP 1/2 Sec6 &NS 23.216,0080 HutchimorI MN 55350 of WI10.1' Lot 4 AP Lot 15 AP Sec 7- 116.29 1 f 5X5.00 f f f f 5 11 06- 116 -29- 14-0190 Stafford & Delores nortw; 1006 lorg croon St SE 0 0 0 1006 St SE Lott Block 3 23.154.0340 JH=Wrlsen MN 55350 Selchow- o n Subd, f f - S - f S SA 5037 - Pop t of 5 Co BY: C-R10E COMPUTED BY: CRICE CHECKED BY: J. RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL LErnNG NO, YPROJECT NO. •0606 00-05: JORGENSON ST SE FROM HAMAN ST SE TO CENTURY AVE BE 00416: OAR LN SE - EAST OF JORGENSON ST BE BY CONBPRUCT0l4 OF STORM SLWSR, BArHtARY SEWER A SLRVICFA WATLRNWK A SLRVICEA. GRADWQ GRAVEL BASE CURB A OUTTEF, BITUMINOUS RAW, SURFACDIG A APPURTENANCES S 1 &75 S 5,315 S 869.63 SIREETCOSTPER@HT -N SELCHOw STREET COST PER UNTT- wATER 1QYVHZ COBT PER EACH NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 S 737.18 SEWEtt SIRVRZ COST PER EACH ADOPTED: 10110/00 S 557.62 D RMMVAY COST nit UMT INTEREST RATE: RerA IWB0 IAH Y3141BM 41540 ACCOUNT NO. CITYPIDNO. NAME A ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEOALD]wwPTION ADDITIONORSUSDIVISION UNIT STREET WATER SERVICE lLw6R SERVICE DRIVEWAY TOTAL ACTIVE ASSPI8MENT COUNTY Pin NO. 12 06- 116 -29- 14-0200 Rog & Sharon Mumm 1000 lorzenson St SE 0 0 1 1000 Jorgenson St SE Lot 2 Block 3 $50 Credit 21.154.0350 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow-jorgenson Subd. I $ 5,225.00 $ S $ 507.62 $ 5 13 06- 116 -29- 14-0210 layson & Cori Ewen 998 jorgelmn St SE 1 1 1 998 jorgenson St SE Lot 3 Block 3 '3.154.0 ,�0 I lm, hinxm MN 55350 Salchow- .. unani Sui'l. I S 3918.75 S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 082.17 14 06- 116- 29- 1 -L0_'0 Nathan & Snuh Ubbon 992 o enson St SE 1 1 1 992 Jorgenson St SE Lot 4 Block 3 13.154.0370 l lumhinson MN 55350 Selchow-jorgerison Subd. 1 S 3 S 868.62 $ 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 15 06- 116 -29 -14 0230 Dennis & Bubam Burkstrand 988 jorgeri,ton St SE 1 I 1 988 jorgernon St SE Lot 5 Block 3 23.154.0380 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd. 1 S 3,918.75 S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 16 06- 116 -29- 14-0240 IPatrick Hiltner 978 jorgcnson St SE 1 1 1 978 o enson St SE Lot 6 Block J 21.154.0390 l lutchinson MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd. 1 $ 3,918.75 $ 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6,082.17 17 06- 116 -29 -14 -0250 Sheldon & Sli ril nn Crouse 968jorgcnson St SE 1 I 1 %8 lorgcnson St SE Lot 7, Block 3, '1154.0400 I lutchumm, MN 55350 Selchow - jorgcnson Subd, I S 3 $ 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6,082.17 18 06- 116 29 -14 -02(,0 Ave ron Iion a Inc 958 Jorgenson St SE 1 1 1 9 Nnrth woods Ave NE P P B,,.< 17 Lot 8, Block J 21154.0410 1 Iutchinstm MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd. 1 $ 3,918.75 S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 19 06 116 -29 -14 -0270 ILawrence &1 948 lorgenson St SE 1 1 1 948 jorgermon St SE Lot 9, Block 3 23.154.0420 Hutchinson MN 55350 Scichow- o enson Subd. 1 $ 3,918.75 S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 20 06- 116 -29 -14 0280 Casey & S=y Stout 938 jo eon St SE 1 1 1 938 jorgerison St SE Lot 10 Block 3 21154.0430 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd. S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 082.17 21 06- 116 -29- 14-0290 Dean & can Wei el 928 o enson St SE 1 I 928 o enson St SE Lot 11 Block 3, 23.154.0440 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow - o enson Subd. pi !3,918.75 S 868.62 S 737.18 S 557.62 S 6 08217 22 06- 116 -29- 14-0500 Melvin & Henriena Wentworth 918 or euson St SE 1 1 918 o etrson St SE Lot 12 Block 3 23.154.0450 1lutchi Ram MN 55350 Sd,N,w -o cnson Subd. S 969.621 S 737.18 1 S 557.62 1 S 6082.17 SA 5037 - Pape 2 of 5 AOL CdEEIRD BY: C- RICE COMPL)TED BY: CRICE CIIECKED BY: A RODEBERG AMESSMENT ROLJJW7 LETTING NO. 4R'ROTECT maBldf W) US, .R)RGT:NSON ST SE FROM RASRANI ST SE 1'0 CENT'I IRY AVE SE b -na: OAR IJ SF, - EAST OF JORGENSON S SE BY CANS] RI IPTRIN UE S IORM EEWER SANITARY SEWER A SERVICES, WAI ERFIAIN S SERI IC ES, GRAUINO GRAVEI. BASE, CURB & GOT T BIIMINOIB BASE, SURFACING A,"PURI EN ANCES $ 3,91&75 f 5,225.00 S E68.62 STREET COSTPERIINIT- OF SEI.C'IIOW STREET COST PER UNIT- OP WATER SERVICE COST PER RACII NUMBER OF YEARS) 1B S 737.18 SEWER SERVICE, COST PER FACII ADOPIEI), IB/lBM f 5_57,62 w A Y COST'YER UNIT INTEREST RATE: Rw IMIVIO UaH 1- 22 -0MW"e 41 5-Oa ACCOUNT NO. CITY PIDNO NAME &ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER Lt D fflPOOH ADDITIONORSUBdVWON UNIT STREET WATER SERVICE SEWER SERVICE DRIVEWAY 101 At, ACI IVL ASSEiSMF,Ni COIORY PID BO. 23 06- 116.29- 140310 Fred & Barbara Barlau 926 Hassan St SE 1 1 1 926 Hassm St SE Lot 13 Block 3 23.154.0460 Hutchinson MN 55350 Selchow-jorgenson Subd- f S 868.62 f 737.18 f 557.62 f 2,163.42 24 06- 11629- 14-0350 Alice jensm 16 Selchow Ave SE 0 0 0 16 Selchow Ave SE Lot 1, Block 4 Hurchinson MN 55350 S.4chow-lorycown Subd. 0 S f $ f S 25 07- 116 - 2943-0020 Swule & G. S,ieszka 1019 O etuon St SE 0 0 1 1019 o s)xx) SE SE EI04.92' of W281.02' of S50' of Lot 10 All S 112 Hutchinson MN 55350 Sec. 6 -11629 & E104.92' of W281.02' of N57' of 23.216.0090 Lot 4 AP Lot 15 AP Sec. 7- 116 -29 1 $ 5 f f S 557.62 S 5 26 07- 11619 43-0030 Swale & G. Scinzka 25 Sherwood Gr SE 0 0 0 1019joyEmson St SE Oudot A 23.220.0010 Hutchirsou MN 55350 Schrarnn's Addition $ f f f S 27 07. 11629 -03'1040 Robert & Dime Homan 1035 o enson St SE 0 0 1 1035 Jorgenson St SE Lot 1 ock 1, 23.222.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 Batkei s Addition - 1 f 5,225.00 f f f 557.62 f 5,782.62 28 7- 116 -29 -03-0051 Mark & and Prior 1039 jorge on St SE 0 0 0 1039 Jor&mFon St SE Lot 14 EX SE'ly Tma 13.10'x 214.40'x 35' 23.159.0170 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition I f 5,225.00 f S - f $ 5, 225.00 29 07. 116. 29-03-0060 Howard & Helen Popp 1045 jorEmson St SE 0 0 0 1045 jorimson St SE NW'ly Tract 77.33' x 214.4' x 12' of Lot 13 & Hurchinson MN 55350 SE'ly Tract 13.10'x 214.40' x 35' of Lot 14 23.159.0160 Oak Park Addition 1 f 5,225.00 $ S f f 5 30 07.116-29 -03-0070 lovm Clctluvsky 1055 jorlmuni St SE 0 0 0 1055 Jorgenson St SE Lot 13 EX NW'ly Tract 77.33' It 214.40' x 12' 23.159.0150 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition I S 5,225-00 f f f f 5, 225.00 31 07- 11629 -03-0080 Richard & Elaine Blade 1065 Jorgenson St SE 0 0 0 922 Hagan St SE Lot 1 23.159.0140 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 f S 225.00 f f f S 5,225.00 32 07.11629-0344 Larry & Donn Schuette 1026 jorEmson St SE 0 0 0 1026jorgertson St SE Wl16.Tof Lots AP Lot 15 23.224.0020 Hutchinson MN 55350 Aud. Plat Section 7 -11629 1 f 5 225.00 f - S f - f 5,225M] 33 7. 11629 -03 -0100 Walter & Selnn Braun 1036 lor2mson St SE 0 0 0 1036 St SE Lot 15 23.159.9180 Hlachineon MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 f 5 f f f SA 3031- Pap& 3 0( 5 BY: C. RICE COMPUTED BY: C. RICE CHECKED BY: 1 RODEBERG ASSESSMENT R 5077 . LETTING NO, 4/PR 0045 a 0046 00. W; .IORGENSON ST SE FROM HASSAN ST BE TO CENTURY AVE BE 00-06: OAK IN SE - EAST OF.IORGBNSON ST SE BY CON■TXUCT10N OF STORM■EWEIA SANITARY&EWER A SERVICES, W.ATERMAIN a SERVICES. G"DIN GRAWLB&Sr, CURB A MITTER. MI SURFACING a APPURTLNANC f 7.918.75 $ 5,225.08 S 865.62 ETRTST COBT PER ONTI D; Vl. ®ow STREET COST PER mum OF WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH NUMBER OF YEARS. 10 S 777.18 SEWRR SERVICE COST I= EACH ADOPTED: 1N10/W $ 557.62 DRIVEWAY COST PER UNIT INTEREST RATE: RnW - Imt 1MH -a1 -00'1M 41]-00 A' COUNT NO, CITY PHI NO. NAME &MnR OF PROPERTY OWNER LROALDESCRIPTION ADDD ION OR S"WVMION UNIT STREET WATER SERVICE ■EWER SERVICE DRIVEWAY TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT POnXIY I'In NO. 34 07 -1 I6 -29 -03 -0110 Gary & Yvonne Brinkmeier 1046 Jorgetison St SE 0 0 0 1046 lommmm St SE Lot 16 23.159.0190 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 $ 5,225.00 E E S S 5 35 07- 11629 03 -0120 Daniel & Deborah Vi neu 1056 Jorzen.son St SE 0 0 0 1056 lorvmson St SE Lot 17, 2 3,159.0200 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 S 5,225.00 S S E Is 5 36 07- 116 -29 -03 -0130 Newton & Waneva Potter 1066 - jorzeruson St SE 0 0 0 1066 lorEevsori St SE Lot 18 23.159.0210 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 f 5,225.00 $ S f S 5 37 07- 116 -29 -03 -0140 Tornow &Brenda Wumberge, 1076 - jorEenson St SE 0 0 0 1076 Jorgenson St SE Lot 19, ' 1.159.02_ Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 f 5,225.00 f S $ f 5 38 07- 116 -`9 -01 0150 Lim Lnrvn. & Scott T.4-bin , erlc 1086 o m..wn St Sr. 1 0 0 1 1086 jorgen.son SL SE Lot 20 13.159.02)0 l lutd.iuson MN 55 }5p Oak Park Addition 1 E $ 225.00 E S E 557.62 S 5,752.62 39 07- 116 -29 -03 0160 Ro &Barbara Tho son 1096 - jorgenson St SE 0 0 0 10%jorymwnSESE Lot 21, 23,159.0240 Hutchinwn MN 55350 Oak Park, Addition 1 E 5,225.00 E f E f 5 225.00 40 07- 116 -29 -02 -0280 Ro &Loretta ohnsen 1135 jorzenwn St SE 0 0 1 1135 joreervson St SE Lot 4, 23.159.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 S 5,225.00 f f S 557.62 S 5 41 07- 116 -29 -02 -0290 Raymond &Karla Wolter 112U2rgenson St SE 0 0 0 1125 JorEemon St SE Lot 5 23.159.0050 1lutchinwn MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 E 5 S E $ S 5 25.00 42 07 116 -29 -02 -0300 Steven & Kristen Snapp 1115 jorgeIison St SE 0 0 0 1115 Jorger St SE Lot 6 23,159.0060 I lutchin.wu MN 55350 Pak Park Addition I S 5,225.00 S - E S S 5,225.00 43 0, 116 -:1 -02 0310 G. Barry Anderwn 1105 P,re euwn St SE 0 0 0 1105 I.Menson SL SE Lot 7 23.159.0070 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 S 5 S - E f - E 5,225.00 44 07- 116 -29 -02 -0720 Dale & Michelle Inschrmn 1095 lom.enson St SE 0 0 1 1095 o eason St SE Lot il is 23.124.0160 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 1 E 5,225.00 S - is 557.621 S 5,78262 SA 5037 - Page 4 of 5 F- r-I I N BY: C RICE COMPUTED BY: C. RICE CH[® BY: S. RODEBF.RG A8WWAENT B 7 LE MNG NO. 41PROJER P7MWM ■ W-06 DD -OS: JORGENSON 3T 9E FROM HASSAN 5T 6E TO CENTURY AVE SE 5604: OAK LN SE - EAST OF JORGENSON ST SE BY CONSTRUCTION OF STORM WWTp SANITARY SEWER A SERVICES, WATERMAIN s SERI ICES, GRADRI GRAVELB L'URB A OMTER BDt1MJNOM BAK 6UIVACING A APPURT ENANM S 3,918.75 S 5,22500 f 868.62 STREET COST PER I1NTT - P SFJ.CIIOW SIRF3.T COPT PER 11NTt F WATER SERVICE C06T PER EACH NM OF YEARSr 10 S 737.18 SEWER SERVICE COST PER EACH ADORED. Maw S 557.62 DRIVEWAY COST PER UNIT ENTEREST RATE: R�IWM IYH 2-12 "11a 13100 ACCOUNT NO. CIT'PIDN NAMEAADOR72S OF PROPERTY OWNE0. LEOALDESCRIPTION ADDITON ORSUEDTVp10N UNIT STREET WATER SERVICE SE R SERVICE DRR'EWAY IGTALACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTYPIDNO. 45 07 116 - 29 - 0_' - 0770 Ter & DIA, r,A 1 h kd 1085 or a-nvm St S 0 0 1 1085 o mson St SE Lot 9 23.159.00% Hutchinson MN 55750 Oak Park Addition I f 5 S f S 557.62 f 5,782.62 46 07.116.29 -02 -0360 Leonard EC D. Lewandowski 1106 Jorgenson St SE 0 0 0 1106 Jorgenson St SE Lot a I - 23.159.0250 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition I S 522500 f - f f - f 5 225.00 47 7- 116 - 29-02 -0370 Donald & Karen Poirot 1116 lontenson St SE 0 0 0 1116 forzenson St SE Lot 23 23.159.0260 Hurchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 S 5,225.00 $ f S - $ 5,225.00 48 07.116 -29 -02 -0380 Dennis ,k Colleen Piechowski 1126 Jorgen&an St SE 0 0 1 1126 formcruwan St SE Lot 24, 23.159.0270 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 I S 5,225.00 $ E f 557.62 f 5,782.62 49 07- 116 -29 -02 -0230 Roselin J.nas Trust 175 Oak Ln SE 0 0 0 175 Oak LnSC Iof3 Bh,k1 ___ __ 27.221.0030 l lutchiruon MN 55750 13='s Addition 1 f 5 225.00 f f S S 5,!!5.00 50 07- 116 -29 -02 -0240 Venwn K Linda Meyer 116 O k Ln SE 0 0 0 116 Oak Ln SE W200' of Lot 6 AT Lot IS Aud Plat 23.224.0060 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 7 -116 -29 EX Tract to Gty 1 f 5 225.00 f f f f 5,225.00 51 07 -116 -29-02 -0340 John k Vickie Curtiss 110 Oak Ln SE 1 0 0 1 110 Oak Ln SE La 10 EX Triangular Tract in NE Comer, 23.159.0110 - Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition I f 5,225.00 f - E f 557.62 S 5,782.62 52 07- 116 -29 -02 -0343 William ,Y Susan Corby 112 Oak Ln SE 0 0 0 112 Oak Ln SE Put of Lou 7 & 8 of AP of Lot 15 Aud. Plat 73.224.0090 Hurchirlwn MN 55350 Section 7- 116-29 1 f 5,225.00 1 S f f E 5,225.00 53 7- 11629 -02 -0350 Alan k Cortuulce Weber 105 Oak Ln SE 0 0 0 105 Oak Ln SE Lot 11 EX Tract for Street 23.159.0120 Hutchinson MN 55350 Oak Park Addition 1 S 5,225.00 f f f f 5 TOTAL • ASSFSSMENT ROLL 5037 47 $ 223 368.75 f 15,653.16 S 13 S 14,932.74 S . &15037 - Pap 5 d 5 RESOLUTION NO. 11588 REVISED RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NOS. 00 -09100 - 12100- 13100 -17 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Project No. 00 -09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00 -12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman s 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -13 8th Avenue SW in Hunters Ridge by construction of bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; and the bid price for such improvement is $283,842.78 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $68,122.27 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $351,965.05. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUT&INSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $270,891.88 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $81,073.17. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a penod of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. • Mayor City Administrator �4 RESOLUTION NO. 11589 RESOLUTION ADOPTING REVISED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 61PROJECT NOS. 00 -09100- 12100- 13100 -17 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and notice of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of Project No_ 00 -09 Griffin Avenue NE from TH 15 to Maple Street NE by construction of grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances. Project No. 00-12 Hilltop Drive NE in Santelman's 3rd Addition from Michigan Street NE to Paul's Road NE by construction of water services, sanitary sewer services bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00-13 8th Avenue SW in Hunter's Ridge by construction of bituminous wear course and appurtenances; Project No. 00 -17 Michael Court NW, North of North High Drive (CSAH 12) to KDUZ by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watennain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment is hereby accepted with the following revisions: a) Griffin Ave NE • is hereby rejected due to high cost and will be considered next year, b) Michael Court NW, North of North High Or t4 KDUZ - construction is reduced to sanitary sewer and appurtenances; and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. A copy of the revised assessment is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period often (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of _p ercent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment. to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000: and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31 st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator 0 i 0 N COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. M39 LE'FITNG NO, 6 /PROJECT NO. 00 09 GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE BY CONSTRUCTIONOF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFA('ING AND APPIfRTENANC.E3 S - STREEf COST PER FROM FOOT COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG $ - WATER SERVICE COST PER EACH CHECRFD BY: P. VANDER VEEN NUMBEROFYEARS: 10 ISTHE MNG04RN /M.2NDIIAKING05 /23/1= INTEREST RATE: ADDP(ED 0 /13 /r00 EVISm N /Ir /roJOntEVISW t)/I0 /ro ACCOENT NO. CITY P83 NO. NAME &ADDRESS OF PROPPRTT OWNER UfAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION FRONT ITIFT S'IALff WATER SFRVICL TOTAL ACTIVE AS COUKfT PID NO. 1 31- 117 -29 -07-0060 lRoter & PeTu DeMeyer 307 Griffin Ave NE 0 307 Griffin Ave NE Lot 3, Block 3 23.100.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyberg's 2nd Addition 75 f 2 31- 117 -29 -07-0070 anon & Niccole Schwartz 317 Griffin Ave NE 0 317 Griffin Ave NE Ely 76.97' of Lot 5, 23.102.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nybtrg's 4th Addition 90 S - S f - 3 31. 117 -29 -07 -0190 Troy Boettcher & Lisa Berge 205 Griffin Ave NE 0 205 Griffin Ave NE Lot 12, And. Plat of Lot 10, And. Plat S 1/2 23.232.0140 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31- 117 -29 66 S - f - f - 4 31- 117 -29 -07 -0200 Brian & Kathleen Zimmerman 245 Griffin Ave NE 0 245 Griffin Ave NE Lot 5, Block 2, 23.100.0070 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyberg's 2nd Addition 66 $ - f - $ - 5 31- 117 -29 -07 -0330 Richard & Jane Fernholz 105 Griffin Ave NE 0 105 Griffin Ave NE Lot 5, 23.099.0030 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyberg's ISL Addition 66 f 6 31- 117 -29 -07 -0340 Cameron & Jill Hempel 131 Griffin Ave NE 0 131 Griffin Ave NE Lot 6, 23.099.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Nyberg's ht Addition 66 S 7 31-117 -29- 07-0410 Jeffrey & Teresa Schmidt 805 Main St N 0 905 [Main St N Lot 1, Aud. Plat of Lot 10, And. Plat S 1/2 23.232.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 30 & N 1/2 SmLion 31. 117.29 61.8 f S S - 8 31- 117 -29 -07 -0550 James & Teresa Ah[ers 25 Griffin Ave NE 1 25 Griffin Ave NE Lot 8, And. Plat of Lot 10, And. Plat 5 1/2 23.232.0100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Section 30 & N 1/2 Section 31. 117 -29 66 f - S 9 31- 117 -29 -07 -0560 Emil & Virginia Vozenilck 745 Main St N 0 745 Main St N Lot 1, Block I, 23.088.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - $ - $ - 10 31- 117 -29 -07-0650 Russell & Doris Nelwn 746 Oak SL NE 0 746 Oak St NE Lot 10, Block 1, 23.088.0100 lHutchinsim MN 55350 lCoBege Addition 66 f - $ - f - • COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO.67PROJECT NO. 00-09 GRIFFIN AVE NE FROM TH 15 TO MAPLE ST NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER- BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING AND APPURTENANCES S SIREEI COST PER FROMPOOT COMPUTED BY, JRODEBERG S - VATFR SERVICE COST PER EACH CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN NUMBEROFYEARS: 10 1ST Ea 01/01/ - 2WHEARING 1I3l INTEREST RATE: ADDP 03123 12N] /REVISID W a /2000n1¢VIS ®10/ ACCOUNT NO. CITY PID NO. NAME & ADDRESS OF PROPPRIY OWNER LEG AL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SURDIVIAON FRONT FEET STREET PATER SERVICE TOWAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY LID NO. 11 31- 117 -29 -07 -0820 Craig & Tammy Lauer 106 Griffin Ave NE 0 106 Griffin Ave NE Lot 1, Block 4, 23.088.0270 Hutchinson MN 55350 CoNgc Addition 66 f - f - S - 12 31- 11;� 129 - 07-0910 Ursula K. Smith 744 Elm St NE 0 744 Hut St NE Lot 10, Block 4, 23.088.0360 Hutchinson MN 55350 Collcgc Addition 66 S - f - S - 31- 117 -2907 -0920 Ryan T. Huls 200 Griffin Ave NE 0 200 Griffin Ave NE Lot 1, Block 5, 23.098 -0370 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 66 S - f - S - J 14 31- 117 -29 -07 -1010 Robert Arthur. Jr. &Brenda Arthur 246 Griffin Ave NE 0 246 Griffin Ave NE NW of Lot 10, Block 5, 23.088.0460 Hutchinson MN 55350 College Addition 64 S - S - f 15 31- 117 -29 -07 -1190 Aura M. Paul 755 Ash St NE 0 755 Ash St NE Lot 1, Block 8, 23.088.0640 Hu¢hinsnn MN 55350 College Addition 66 f - f - S - 16 31- 117 -29 -07 -1280 Stanley & Lorraine Runnei 756 Maple St NE 0 756 Ma Ic St NE Lot 10, Block 8, 23.088.0730 Hutchinson MN 55350 lCollege Addition 66 S f TOTAL - PR OJECT NO. 00-09 1082.8 S - I f - N 0 a a C OMPILE D BY: 3RODEB ASSESSMENTROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 00.12 UILLTOP DR NE PROM MICHIGAN ST NE'TO PAIIL S RD NE BY CONSTRUCTIONOF WATER SERVICES ,SANTI'ARYSEWERSFRVICES, BnU NOUS WFAR COARSE AND APPURTENANCES ' $ 661.08 STREET COST PER PARCEUS45MH PARCELS COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG S 403.99 STREET COST PER UNIT/NORTH PARCELS CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN $ 850.32 ILMLICIES COST PER P ARCEL/SOUT11 P ARCELS NUMBEROFYEARS: 10 TNTFRESI'RATE-- 1ST IIFARIN4 W /w /toao.lrvD llEnalrvt; os //) /xoa A[K)PIID OS /a) /IOCP/REVISFD OUI) /M00 /REVISED 10 /ID /i0J0 ACCOUNT NO. CRY PID NO. NAME N ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DFIRTPHON ADDTHONO UBDLVIAON UNIT OR PARCEL SIREET uTL- " TOTAL ACTNE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 17 32- 117 -29 -14 -0490 Kenneth Sanrelman Trust 106 Pauls Rd NE 106 Paula Rd NE Lot 3, Block I, 23.251.0030 Hutchinson MN 55350 Santelman's Second Addition I f 661.08 f 661.08 18 32.11729- 14-0500 Morningside Dev. Co, of Hutchinson 504 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o St Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 1, Block 1, 23.253.0010 Redwood PoIL MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 S 850.32 f 1 ,51140 19 32- 117 - 2914-0510 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 512 Hilltop Dr NE I c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 2, Block 1, 23.2510020 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition I f 661.06 f 850.32 S 1,511.40 20 32- 117 -29. 140520 Mornin de Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 520 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 3, Block 1, 21253.0030 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Thiel Addition I f 661.08 S 850.32 f 1,511.40 21 32- 117 -29- 14-0530 Morningsidc Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 530 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 4, Block 1, 23-253.0040 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 f 850.32 f 1,511.40 22 32- 117 -29- 14-0540 Morningside Dev, Co. of Hutchinson 540 Hilltop Dr NE I c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 5, Block 1, 23.253.0050 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 1 f 661.081 S 850.32 f 1,511.40 23 32417 -29- 14-0550 Morningsidc Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 550 Hilltop Dr NE 1 Jo Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Int 6, Block 1, 53.0060 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Thud Addition 1 f 661.08 S 850.32 f 1,511.40 [322-117-29-1+40560 24 Mornin side Dev. Cu. of Hutchinson 560 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Stove Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 7, Block 1, .53.0070 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition I f 66L08 f 850.32 f 1,511.40 0 s COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5079 LETTING NO.6 /PROJECT NO. M12 HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICI-UGAN ST NE TO PAUUS RD NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES, In1UMINOUS WEAR('( IURSP. AND APPUR'ITNANTS S 661.08 BEREFT COST PER PARCEL)SOUTH PAR COMPUTED BY: f RODEREAG S 403.99 STREET COST PER UNITE /NORTH PANCFLS CHECKFD BYt P. VANDER VEEN S 850.31 JUTILTITIES COST PER PARCE1JSOUTFI PARCELS NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 W11- RP-sTRAI'F: ISTIWAMNGN =. )TARING 4 AIUMMn 01 /]) /lY0 /RQVL4pn N /13 1]LW ID /10 /M ACCOUNT' NO. CT' ND NO. NAME It ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNFA UGAL DE5CRIPDON ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION UNIT OR PARCFl SIRm UnLMU TOTAL ACTIVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY 1'M NO 25 32- 117 -2914 -0570 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 570 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 8, Block 1, 23.253.0080 Redwood Fills MN 56283 Sanmlman's Third Addition 1 5 661.08 $ 850.32 $ 1,511.40 26 32 -117- 2914 -0580 Momingside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 580 Hilltop Dr NE 1 c/o Steve Klabunde - P O Box 13 Lot 9, Block 1, 23.253.0090 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition I S 661.08 S 850.32 f 1,511.40 27 32 -117- 2914 -0590 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 590 Hilhop Dr LYE I c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 LuL 10, Block 1, 23 251.0100 Redwu,xl Falls MN %283 Santdrn.n's Third Addition I S 661.08 $ 850.32 f 1,511.40 28 T 2- 11 - 29 -14 - Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 6001 lilhop Dr NE 1 C/o Steve Klabunde - — P O Box 13 Lot 11, Black 1, 23,253.0110 Redwood Fills MN 56283 Sandman's Third Addition 1 S 661.08 S 850.32 f 1,511.40 29 32- 117 -29- 14-0610 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 505 Hilltop Dr NE 0 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lut I, Block 2, 23.253.0120 Re"ool Falls MN 56283 Santelmn's Third Addition 3 $ 1,211.97 f $ 1,211.97 30 32- 117 -29- 14-0620 Morningside Dev. Co. of Hutchinson 515 Hilltop Dr NE 0 c/o Steve Klabunde P O Box 13 Lot 2, Block 2, - 23253.0130 Redwood Falls MN 56283 Santelman's Third Addition 3 S 1,211.97 S - f 1,211.97 31 12- 117 -29 -14 -0870 Margaret Shaffer I I I Morninside Dr NE 0 I I I Morningside Dr NE Unit 111 &. 167% Common Area 21.255.00.10 1 lutdtins MN 55350 C... don inium No. 6, Morningside Enate 1 f 40399 f - f 407,99 32 32- 117 -29 -14 -0840 Delbert & Janice Klabunde 113 Morningside Dr NE 0 113 Morningside Dr NE Unit 113 &.166% Common Alria 23.255.0050 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningskle Estate I 5 40199 S - f 403.99 33 32- 117 -29 -H -0850 Sandra Bonniwell 1115 Morningside Dr NE 0 115 Morningside Dr NE Unti 115 &. 167% Common Ara 23.255.0060 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No 6, Morningside Estate 1 S 403.99 f S 403.99 a Ah Ah COMP Y: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO, 5039 MW LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. M12 HILLTOP DR NE FROM MICI IIGAN ST NE TO PAUL'S RD NE BY CONSTRUCTION OF WATER SERVICES, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES, RHIINIMOUS WEAR COURSE AND APPURTENANCES f 661.08 f 403.99 STREET COST PER PARCH SOUTH PARCE STREET COST PER UNIT /NORTH PARCELS COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VENN S 850.32 UTILITIES COST PER PARCELISOUTH PARCELS NUMBER OF YEARS: 10 TNTFABST RATE: ISn1FAMNG w /a /z W9 1MnIIAxtNG OSm /iaoa AIh1PIFP 05 /731SN] /REVISW CUIlflN /RTVISED I0 /10 /1W ACCOUNT NO. CM PLO NO. NAME &ADDKE.SS UP PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION AUDTONOFfSUBUMSION UNIT OR PARCPI. STBI'EI uninl TOTAL ACOVF. _ ASSrSSMIIN'I' COUN4 PID NO 34 32- 117 -29 -14-1010 Jill Man' R,nccs - — _ 104 Morning Dr NE 104 Morningside D1 NE Unit 104, 23.255.0220 Hutchinson MN 55350 Conduminiunt No. 6, Morningside Estate I S 407.99 $ - f 40397 35 32- 117 -29 -14 -1020 Robert & Charlotte Hanson 106 Morningside Dr NE 0 _ 106 Morningside Dr NE Unit 106, 23.255.0230 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium Nu. 6, Morningside Estate 1 f 403.99 S - f 403,99 36 32- 117 -29- 141030 Lori Waldera -Tanfa 109 Morningside Dr NE 0 108 Morningside Dr NE Unit 108 &. 167% Common Area, 23.255.0240 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estue 1 f 403.99 f - $ 403.99 37 32. 117 -29 -14 -1070 Thu & Guynh Nguyen 515 Hilltop Dr NE 0 525 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 525 &.167% Common Area, 23.255.0280 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No 6, Morningside Estate 1 f 403.99 f - S 403.99 38 32- 11729 -14 -1080 Ardis & Leola Hoverter 5271 Whop Dr NE 0 _ 527 Hilltop Dr NE Una 527 &.167% Conlmun Area, 23,255.0290 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium Nu_ 6, Morningside Estate 1 S 403.99 f - S _ _ 401 99 39 32.117 -29 -14 -1090 Cheryl Labat 529 Hilltop Dr NE 0 529 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 529 &.167%Common Area, 23.255.0300 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Momingside "te 1 S 403.99 f - f 403.99 40 32- 117 -29 -14 -1100 Alan Cook 535 Hilltop Dr NE 0 535 Hdltop Dr PIE Unit 535 &.167% Common Area 23.255.0310 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 f 403.99 $ - f 403 99 41 32- 117 -29.14 -1110 lVerdefla Demenge 537 Hilltop Dr NE 0 537 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 537 &.167% Common Area, 23.255.0320 Hutchinson MN 55350 Condominium No. 6, Morningside Estate 1 f 403.99 $ - f 403.99 42 32- 117 -29- 141120 Linda Rick 539 Hilltop Dr NE 0 539 Hilltop Dr NE Unit 539 &.167 %Common Area, 23.255.0330 Hutchmsun MN 55350 Condominium No 6, Morningside EsLaw I S 403 f - f 401 99 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00.12 30 S 15,204.78 S 9,364,52 f 24,558.30 \r COMPILED BY: I RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5039 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. 0615 8TH AVENUE ST IN HUNTER'S RIDGE BY CONSTRUCTION OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE It APPURTENANCES S 1,137.39 STRELff COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG CIIEC BY: P. VANDER VEEN NUMBER OP YEARS: 10 IST IIRKR /woo - IMP HEARING INTEREST RATE ADOPT71) 0S/i1 /=0/REVMW U /II /300D/IIEVISZn IWI ACCOUNT NO. CRY PID NO. NAME It ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION EACH STRPPr CREDIT TOTAL. ACTTVE ASM591PHT COUNTY PID NO. 43 02- 11&30- 16-0050 Mark & Ruth Senn 1447 Bth Ave SW 1447 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 1, 23.420.0010 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 S - S 1,137.39 44 02 -I d.30 x(.0060 Joel & Karen Drumm 1441 Atli Ave SW 1441 8th Ave SW Lot 2, Block I, 23.420,0020 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,137.39 1 - S 1,137.39 45 02- 11630- 16-0070 Bruce Ellig 1435 8th Ave SW 1435 8th Ave SW Lot 3, Block 1, 23.420.0030 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 $ 1,137.39 f - S 1,137.39 46 02 -116 -30-16 -0080 Kevin Compton 14318th Ave SW 18482 202nd Cir Lot 4, Block 1, 23.420.0040 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,13739 S - S 1,137.39 47 02-11630 -16 -0090 David & Pamela Johnston 1427 8th Ave SW 1427 8th Ave SW Lot 5, Block 1, 23.420.0050 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunters Ridge I S 1,137.39 f - $ 1,137.39 48 02- 11630- 16-0100 TcxU & Marie Pecsinger 1423 8th Ave SW 1423 8th Ave SW Lot 6, Block 1, 23.420.0060 Iutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,137.39 S - S 1,137.39 49 02- 11630- 160110 Kevin & Dada Keith 1417 Bth Ave SW 1417 8th Ave SW Lot 7, Block 1, 23.420.0070 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 $ 1,137.39 S - $ 1,137.39 50 02- 11630 -16 -0120 Darwin & Lorine Maus 1448 8th Ave SW 1448 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 2, L7.420.0080 Hutchinsom MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 S 1,137,39 S - $ 1,137.39 51 02- 11630 - 16-0130 Ronald & Susan McKinnon 1444 8th Ave SW 1444 8th Ave SW Lot 2, Block 2, 23.420.0090 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 $ 1,137.39 S - $ 1,137.39 52 02 -1 16-30 16 -0140 Janet Krumrey 850 Hunters St SW 850 Hunters St SW Lot 3, Bloc 2, 23.4200100 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hu nter's Ridge 1 S 1,137.79 f - S 1,137.39 • COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO, 5039 LETTING NO. UPROJECT NO. W -13 8TH AVENUE SW IN HUNTER'S RIDGE BY CONSTRUCITON OF BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE &APPURTENANCES I 5 1,137.39 STHEET COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG CHECKED BY: P. VANDER VEEN NUMBEROFYEARS: 10 uT UFA0.mc a /ana00. 7NDIIaRwa05 /23 /m INTEREST RATE: At10PIFl> 03 /23 /M /RIMSPD % /I2 /30A /AENSFD 10/10/2D ACCOUNT NO. CRY PID NO. NAME&ADDRESS OPPROPERTYOWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION EACH STIum CREDIT TOTAL AC UVE ASSESSMENT COUNTY PU3 NO. 53 02-11 6 -0150 lKaren Cra o 1404 8th Ave SW 1404 8th Ave SW Lot 1, Block 3, 23.420.0110 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge I 5 1,137.39 S - f 1,137.)/ 54 02- 11630 - 16-0160 Mark & Robin Ljungren 1408 8th Ave SW 1408 Srh Ave SW Lot 2, Block 3, 23.420.0120 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride 1 f 1,177.39 55 02. 11630-16.0170 Loren & Deborah Rannow 1414 8th Ave SW 1414 8th Ave SW Lot 3, Block 3, 21420.0130 lHutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride I S 1,137.79 S - S 1,137.39 56 02. 11630 - 160180 Dennis & Karen Ingle 1418 8th Ave SW 1418 8th Ave SW Lot 4, Block 3, 23.420.0140 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge 1 f 1,177.39 f - f 1,137.79 57 02- 11&30- 16-0190 Dan & Kimberly Brehmer Lot 5, Block 3, 1424 8th Ave SW 1424 8th Ave SW 23,420.0150 Hutchinson MN 55750 Hunter's Rid e 1 S 1,17739 f - f 1. 07.39 58 02. 116 -30- 16-0200 Richard Nay & Sherry Mischel -Nay Lot 6, Bl,.k 3, -- 1430 8th Ave SW 1430 8th Ave SW 23.420.0160 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ride I f 1,137,39 $ - $ 1,137.19 59 02 -11 &30-16-0210 Kathy Hintze Lot 7, Block 3, 855 Hunters St SW 855 Hunters St SW 23.420.0170 Hutchinson MN 55350 Hunter's Ridge I f 1,137.39 S - _ S -__ I, 137 19 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. DO-13 17 f 19,335,63 S - f 19,335.67 I • 0 COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5019 LETTING NO. 6 /PROJECT NO. M 1 MICHAEL COURT NW: NOR 'III OF NORTH HIGI I DR TO RDIR BY CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER & SERVICES $ STREET COST PER EACH COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG $ - WATFRWJN COST PER EACH CIIECRED BY: P. VANDER VFFN S 6,19654 ISANITARY SEWER COST PER EACH NUMBFR OF YEARS: 10 1ST HEARING N/N /7000 - 7ND HEARING 05 /D /3000 INTEREST RATE: ADOPTED 05 /73/7000 - REVISED 06 /12/7000 - REVISED 10/10/2000 ACCOUNI NO. CITY Pit) NO. NAME&ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER LEGAL DP.SCRIPHON ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION EACH STREET WATERMAIN SANITARY SEWER TOTAL ACHVE ASSES94EN1' COLNITPIDNO. 60 30- 117 -29- 140010 Golden Oaks Investment Co. 45 North High Dr NW Jo Eggers 610 Virginia Shores Cir Lot I, Block 1, 23.398.0010 Excelsior MN 55331 Boyle's Addition I S - S - S 6,1 %.54 S 6,1 %.54 61 30-117-29-14-0020 Chet & Associays 110 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 2, Block 1, 23.398.0020 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Bayles Addition 1 $ - $ - f 6,196.54 $ 6,1 96.54 62 30.117 -29- W 0030 Chet & Associates 120 Michael Ct NW 163775 $o. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 3, Block 1, 2 1.398.0030 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Bayles Addition I S - S $ 6,1 S 6,196.54 63 10-11719- 14-0040 Chet & Associates 125 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 4, Block 1, 23.39R.D040 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Bayles Addition 1 $ - S f 6,196,54 f 6,196.54 64 30- 117 -29- 14-0050 ICha & As i2tes 115 Michael Ct NW 163775 So. Bond Lake Fs to Rd Lot 5, BI «k 1, 23398 0050 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Boyles Addition 1 S - S - f 6,196.54 S 6,196.54 65 30-117 -29-14 -0060 Chet & Associates 105 Michael Ct NW 163775 So- Bond Lake Estate Rd Lot 6, Block 1, 23.398.0060 Minong WI 54859 -9463 Boylc's Addition 1 f - f $ 6,1 96.54 S 6,1 %.54 TOTAL - PROJECT NO. 00.17 6 $0.00 50.00 $37,179.24 S37,179.24 PROJECT NO. OD-12 $24,558.30 PROJECT NO. 00.13 $19,335.63 PROJECT NO. 00-17 (37,179.24 TOTAL - ASSESSMENT ROLL 5039 $81,073.17 RESOLUTION NO. 11590 RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5046 LETTING NO. 9 /PROJECT NO. 00 -23 /CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of: Project No. 00 -23 Louisiana Avenue NW, Lots 1 through 5 in Rolling Meadows Second Addition, by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $41,659.45 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $9,998.27 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $51,657.72. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $0.00 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $51,657.72. • 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years,-the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor • City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11591 RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT • ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 4046 LETTING NO. 9/PROJECT NO. 00- 231CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 9th day of May, 2000, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Project No. 00 -23 Louisiana Avenue NW, Lots 1 through 5 in Rolling Meadows Second Addition, by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The owners of the affected properties have waived hearing on said proposed assessment. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 2000. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator n RESOLUTION NO. 11592 • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5046 LETTING NO. 9/PROJECT NO. 00- 231CHANGE ORDER NO. WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of: Project No. 00 -23 Louisiana Avenue NW, Lots 1 through 5 in Rolling Meadows Second Addition, by construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period . of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of _p ercent per annum as set down by the adoptiorrof this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. City Administrator Mayor COMPILED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT ROLL N0.5046 LETTING NO. 9 /PROJECT NO. 00.23 /CHANGE ORDER NO. I ROWNG MEADOWS 2ND ADDITION BY CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING, GRAVEL BASE, CURB AND GUTTER, BITUMINOUS BASE, BITUMINOUS SURFACING ANDARVRIFNANCES $ 10,331.54 COST PER UNIT COMPUTED BY: J RODEBEAG S ' CHECKED BY, P. VANDER VEEN WAIVED IST HEARING NUMBER OF YEARS. 10 WAIVED 2ND HEARING BEST RA TE. 10/10/2000 ADOPTED ACCOUNT NO. CrIY Pm NO. NAME U ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OVNIft I"AL DFSCRIPDON - ADDMON OR SUBItIVtRON MIT OR TAT U-mm /SITPET ASSESSMFNr (1REINI TOTAL ACTIVE ASSFSSMENT COUNTY PID NO. 1 36-117. 30-07 - Sorensen & Nau.RdA Propcnies 1352 Heritage Ave NW Lt 1, Blxk I, 23 Hutchinson MN 55350 Second Addition to Roiling Meadows 1 $ 10,331.54 $ - $ 10,331 -54 2 34 117 - 30-07 - Sorensen 6t Naustdal Properties; 1352 Heritage Ave NW Lot 2, Block 1, 23 Hutchinson MN 55351 Second Addition to Rolling Meadows 1 S 10,331.54 S - $ 10,331.54 3 34 117 -30-07- Sorensen k Naustdal Propmie,s 1352 Heritage Ave NW Lut 3, Block 1, 23 Hutchinson MN 55351 Second Addit1011 to Rolling Meadows I S 10,331.54 S - S 10,331.54 4 34117.30-07- Sorensen K Natwdal Properties 1352 Heritage Ave NW Lot 4, Block 1, 23 Hutchinson MN 55351 Second Addition to Rollin Modows 1 S 10,331.54 S - $ 10,331.54 5 36- 117 - 30-07. Sorensen K Naustdal Pru rties 1352 Henta a Ave NW Lot 5, Block 1, 23 Hutchinson MN 55351 Secorud Addition to Rollin Meadows 1 $ 10,331.54 $ - $ 10,331.54 TOTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5046 1 5 $ 51,657.72 S - $ 51,657.72 5�5(04 PAW PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT (100% OF PROPERTY OWNERS) • CITY OF HUTCHINSON LETTING NO. 9 1 CITY PROJECT NO.00- 231CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Otto Project No. 0020 Hutchinson, Minnesota Dated: October 5, 2000 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: We, all owners of real property known and described as: Louisiana Ave NW, Lots 1 through 5 in Rolling Meadows Second Addition, hereby petition for improvement by construction of stone sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and that the City assess the entire cost of the improvement against our property described below, and we hereby agreed to pay the entire cost as apportioned by the City. This petition shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. OWNERS SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 1) Bruce Naustdal 2) Degise L Naustdal 3) Kon R. Sorensen 4) Diane M. Sorensen Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for. Gary 0. Plotz, City Administrator r] g -�J 3 AGREEMENT OF ASSESSMENT, WAIVER OF HEARING AND WAIVER OF IRREGULARITY AND APPEAL CITY OF HUTCHINSON LETTING NO. 91 CITY PROJECT NO. 00 -23 1CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Otto Project No. 0020 This Agreement, is made this 5th day of October, 2000, between the City of Hutchinson, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and Bruce Naustdal, Denise L. Naustdal, Kon R. Sorensen & Diane M. Sorensen of McLeod County, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as Owner. In consideration of the action of the City Council, at the owners' request, to cause the construction of storm sewer, sanitary sewer and services, watermain and services, grading, gravel base, curb and gutter, bituminous base, bituminous surfacing and appurtenances on Louisiana Ave NW, Lots 1 through 5 in Rolling Meadows Second Addition, and to assess 100% of the cost to the Owner. Owner agrees to pay said percentage, as may be determined by the Council of the City to be a fair apportionment of the costs of said improvement not to exceed $51,657.72, plus interest, over a period ten (10) years. Owner expressly waives hearing and objection to any irregularity with regard to the said improvement assessments and any claim that the amount thereof levied against owner's property is excessive, together with all rights to appeal in the courts. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the heirs, representatives, assigns and successors of the parties. In testimony, whereof, said Owner has hereunto set his hand, the day and year first above written. OWNERS SIGNATURE: ADDRESS: IN PRESENCE OF: • 1) Bruce Naustdal 2) Denise L. Naustdal 3) Kon R. Sorensen 4) Diane M. Sorensen 8 �() RESOLUTION NO. 11593 • RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5046 LETTING NO. 111PROJECT NO. 00 -25 WHEREAS, cost has been determined for the improvement of Market Street SW by construction of trunk storm sewer extension and appurtenances, and appurtenances, and the bid price for such improvement is $101,047.05 and the expenses incurred or to be incurred in the making of such improvement amount to $24,251.30 so that the total cost of the improvement will be $125,298.35. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The portion of the cost of such improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $96,298.35 and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $30,000.00. 2. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001 and shall bear interest at the rate of 10 percent (plus or minus) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. • 3. The City Administrator, with the assistance of the Director of Engineering, shall forthwith calculate the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and he shall file a copy of such proposed assessment in his office for public inspection. 4. The City Administrator shall, upon the completion of such proposed assessment, notify the Council thereof. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator 0 9 -mow -�L RESOLUTION NO. 11594 RESOLUTION WAIVING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5045 LETTING NO. 11 /PROJECT NO. 00 -25 WHEREAS, by a resolution passed by the Council on the 10th day of October, 2000, the Director of Engineering was directed to prepare a proposed assessment of the cost of improving: Project No. 00 -26 Market Street SW by construction of trunk storm sewer extension and appurtenances. WHEREAS, the Director of Engineering has notified the Council that such proposed assessment has been completed and filed in his office for public inspection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. The owners of the affected properties have waived hearing on said proposed assessment. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Administrator, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15th, 2000. He may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Administrator, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before • November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of October, 2000. Mayor City Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 11595 • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5045 LETTING NO. 11 /PROJECT NO. 00 -25 WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution and waiver of hearing the Council has met and reviewed the proposed assessment for improvement of: Project No. 00 -26 Market Street SW by construction of trunk stone sewer extension and appurtenances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted, and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. . 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of _pe rcent per annum as set down by the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from November 1, 2000, until the 31st day of December, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by the 15th day of November, 2000; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to the 31 st day of December, of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15, or interest will be charged through December 31, of the next succeeding year. 4. The Administrator shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County, and such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the Council this 1 Oth day of October, 2000. Mayor • City Administrator �-Z4 —T COMPUED BY: J RODEBERG ASSESSMENT 901.1, NO. 5015 LETTING NO 114PROJECT NO. N 7 NIARAEI' NTRF" NW III ('ONN'1'RIR'I'IONOP MUN'ESTOHIN NEWER ANDAPPUR'I'FNANl' IS " " S 30,IMMIJMI COSI I'M LOT COMPUTED BY: J RODEBERG 5 CRECIJD BY: P.VANDERVF.EN WAIVED IN'I' III'ARING NIIMBEROFYEARS: If WAIVED =ND HEARING QVTERM RATE: 10/102000 ADOPTED ACCOUNT NO. CITY PID NO. NAMEAADDR OF PROPERTY OWnR LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITION OR SUBDIVISION LOT UTD.UY/STREET ASSE55MENT CRFDII TOTAL ACTIVE AMMMENT COUNTY PID NO. 1 12- 116.30 -07 -0030 McLeod County Agriculture Assn Lot 3 Block 1 H.tchinson MN 55350 Nirlround3 Addition 1 $ 30,000.00 S $ 30,000,00 OTAL ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 5045 1 5 30,000.00 5 f 30,000.00 SM Of 1 • October 5, 2000 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir. Floyd Groehler, Cemetery Supervisor Subject: Upcoming informational seminar for cremation & cremation- related services Oakland Cemetery, together with Dobratz- Hantge Funeral Chapels, is planning to host an afternoon seminar on cremation, the process, and options available to the consumer. The date of the s eminar has not yet been finalized, but will be advertised in the local paper. As part of the seminar, we would like to offer a discount on niches in the recently installed columbarium to those participating in the seminar. This discount would be $50 for purchases that day or the following day. This offer would only be made once to those attending the seminar. This s eminar offers a unique opportunity to market the new columbarum to the public, as well as inform them of other options available to those choosing cremation. • Requested action: Authorize a $50 discount for columbarium niches to those participating in the cremation seminar, which must be used within 24 hours of the conclusion of the seminar. Hutchinson Area Health Care Hutcbinson Community Hospital Burns Manor Nursing Home • Dassel Medical Center • Winsted Family Practice Clinic 1095 Highway 15 South Hutchinson, MN 55350 (320) 234 -5000 October 6, 2000 The Honorable Mayor Marlin Torgerson and Members of the City Council Hutchinson City Center 111 Hassan Street SE Hutchinson, MN 55350 Dear Mayor Torgerson and City Council Members: RECEIVED OCT 6 - P000 City of Hutchinsw The Board of Directors of Hutchinson Area Health Care (HAHC), as part of their regular meeting on September 19, 2000, considered a capital expenditure request from staff that requires City Council approval. The purchase would be made through our major buying group, VHA, and as a result would not be advertised for bid. The following is an excerpt from the minutes of that meeting: " Purchase of Anesthesia Machines. The board reviewed the Capital Expenditure Request for the purchase of four Aestvia 3000 anesthesia (gas) machines and four monitoring systems from Datex - Ohmedia. The machines that are currently in use are 11 years old and have gone beyond their useful life. The new equipment is modular in nature and will allow for easier replacement and/or purchase of parts in the future. The expected life of these machines is seven years. This purchase would be made through our VHA contract. The proposed purchase price for four machines and monitors is $265,368 including a trade -in allowance. Following discussion, motion was made by Chrissis, seconded by Snapp to request approval from the City Council to purchase four Aestiva 3000 anesthesia machines and four monitoring systems from Datex - Ohmedia in the amount of $265,368. All were in favor. Motion carried." Thank you, in advance, for consideration of this request. Duane Hoversten will be able to address questions you may have regarding this item at your meeting on Tuesday. Sincerely, HINSON ZZ7 Philip G. Graves President • /cs W 10/01 12000 15:50 ET RU: N0002591.0000 FR:N000T5 T0:7202511210 hN 1 of 5 ATTNI Kenneth Merrill Hutchinson O JOODY'S ASSIGNS A3 RATING TO HUTCHINSON'S (MN) SERIES 2000A, 2000B AND 2000C G.O. BONDS $40.2 MILLION IN DEBT AFFECTED Hutchinson (City of) MN Municipality Minnesota Moody's Rating Issue Rating General obligation Temporary Public Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000 A A3 Sale Amount $4,000,000 Expected Sale Date 10/10/00 Rating Description General Obligation Unlimited Tax General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B A3 Sale Amount $2,800,000 Expected Sale Date 10 /10 100 Rating Description General Obligation Unlimited Tax general Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C A3 • Sale Amount $2,425,000 Expected Sale Date 10 /10 /00 Rating'DTscription General Obligation Unlimited Tax NEW YORK, October 4 9 2000 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A3 rating, with a stable outlook, to Hutchinson, Minnesota'e $4 million General Obligation Temporary Public Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A; $2.8 million General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B; and $2.425 million General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C. In addition, Moody's affirms the A3 rating on the city's outstanding $31 million in general obligation bonds, and affirms the Al rating on the city's outstanding $8.7 million in Public Utility Revenue Bonds. Proceeds from the bonds, all secured by the city's general obligation unlimited tax pledge, will be used to finance transmission upgrades to the utility system, two area trunk sanitary projects, and various special assessment improvements, respectively. The A3 rating reflects the city's rapidly expanding tax bass - which is expected to continue despite cutbacks at a major local employer, satisfactory financial position - including maintenance of favorable reserves, and an above average, but manageable debt burden receiving significant support from non -levy sources. MOODY'S EXPECTS CONTINUED TAX BASE GROWTH AS ANNEXED LAND DEVELOPS; RECENT CUTBACK BY LARGEST EMPLOYER NOT EXPECTED TO HAMPER O VERALL GROWTH Moody's expects continued tax bass growth related to ongoing development of land annexed over the past several years, as well as continued economic stability due to its capacity as a small, regional economic hub. Steady and s ignificant growth in the city's $581 million tax base, averaging 7.1x' growth Annua over the last four years, reflects residential and commercial development as well as property appreciation. Additional commercial development is expected south of a now Target store on newly annexed land. The 10101/2000 15:30 ET RU: N0102591.0000 FN:N000T5 70:3202311210 rep cara city is also experiencing housing growth which includes assisted living units as well as single and multifamily housing. The city'e local economy includes two relatively large employers, Hutchinson Technology, Inc. (HTI) and 3M, 1ich comprise almost 112 of the city's valuation. While approximately 700 . employees were recently released from HTI, primarily through attrition, the company still employe approximately 2,300 employees and the company's operations are reportedly stabilizing. City officials anticipate minimal impact as an extremely tight labor market is expected to absorb most of the employees who choose to stay in the community. HTI recently expanded its Hutchinson campus where it will continue to maintain its headquarters and research and product development operations. Wealth indices for the city are moderately below state averages. SATISFACTORY FINANCIAL POSITION Moody's expects the city to maintain a satisfactory financial position, given officials' adherence to plane to increase the General Fund balance to offset unanticipated operating deficits experienced in 1996 and 1997. The fiscal 1999 General Fund `alance exceeded $1.9 million, or 30.72 of General Fund revenues) fiscal 1993 a recorded an operating surplus in excess of $300,000. Ongoing transfers fron the self - supporting enterprise funds continue to provide support, apprcximately $1 million in fiscal 1999, to the city's general fund operations. r`_ficials project a slight operating surplus for fiscal 2000. ABOVE AVERAG^ DEBT BURDEN HAS SIGNIFICANT SUPPORT FROM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Debt burden, .t 6.12, is above average given the infrastructure needs associated ^'_ -h a growing local economy. Hovever, moody's believes the debt burden rema5::z; manageable given that in recent years tax base growth has outpaced ad,_'tions to debt and debt burden has actually declined from 9.12 in 997. Additi:.:ally, the use of non- property tax revenues such as water and sever revenue::, hospital revenues, and special assessments for almost 902 of all general ;-- ligation debt mitigates the impact upon the city -wide tax base. Moody's expects the city -ovaed 66 -bed hospital to continue supporting hospital general obl.'.g debt due to demonstrated market demand and the hospital's alliance wit'._. „ llina Health System, a major multi - hospital system located in the Twin Ci'.:'._s. While debt service claims nearly a third of the operating budget, this _a partially due to rapid amortization, vhich pays 75.42 of the principal tai =_.in ten years. While the Series 2000A bonde are characterized by a balloon pa?nent in 2003, officials expect to pay the bonds using proceeds from the sal< Df an asset, which is pending. if the sale doesn't occur, the bonds will ' refinanced to extend the maturities. In 2001, the city may issue approximate - - -” ^7 million in general obligation debt for a hospital expansion, subject to :ar approval. Additionally, in 2002, an expansion to the utility's p -line may require approximately $14 million in borrowing of a $17 million pro;e,;t. Both projects would receive support from enterprises that have histori.;_11y been self- supporting, potentially mitigating the impact on the general vy. KEY STATIST7"S: 2000 estima populations 13,307 2000 full -- ._ Lationl $581 million 2000 estimate. full value per capita: $439643 100 unemplu meat (McLeod County)i 2.72 0 Debt burde:L: .12 1010112000 15:30 ET REF: N0002591.0000 MUM T0:32023WA0 hN 3 of 3 Payout of p - _:1cipal (10 years): 75.4% 0 99 General _'und balance: $1.95 million (30.7% of General Fund revelm 8) ANALYSTS: Jonathan Nor.:, Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service Dianne Golul). Backup Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service Linda Ebrah'r.j. Senior Credit Officer, Public Finance Group, Moody's Inveetore Service CONTACTS: Journalists: X212) 553 -0376 Research Clients: (212) 553 -1625 • • • FREERS 8 ASSOCIATES INC 0 To: Mayor and City Council, City of Hutchinson 2 From: Jim Prosser W Subject: Bid Results for $4,000,000 G.O. Temporary Utility Revenue Bonds, C Series 2000A G Date: October 10, 2000 Ehlers & Associates is pleased to provide the following bid results for the $4,000,000 G.O. Temporary Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A which were received on October 10, at 10:00 A. M. $4,000,000 G.O. Bonds, Low Bidder Temporary Public Utility Revenue Bonds Series 2000A True Interest Rate Number of Bids Range of Bids Rating Hanifen Imhoff, Inc. (Denver CO) 4.8796% 4 4.8796% to 5.2118% Moody's "AY MBIA Insured (purchased by underwriter) Moody's Investors Service Aaa Council Action Adopt "A Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Sale of $4,000,000 G.O. Temporary Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A, and Providing For Their Issuance" Awards sale to low bid. • Attachments ■ Bid Tabulation ■ Revised Debt Service Analysis ■ Bond Index for October 10, 2000 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINA 3060 Centre Pointe Drive 651.697.8503 fax 651.697.8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jimQehlers- inc.com BID TABULATION $4,000,000 General Obligation Temporary Public Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A City of Hutchinson, Minnesota SALE: October 10, 2000 AWARD HANIFEN, IMHOFF DIVISION OF STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED RATING MBIA Insured (Moody's Investors Service'Aaa °)' BBI: 5.64% 0 NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE HANIFEN, IMHOFF DIVISION OF STIFEL, 5.00% 2003 NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED Denver, Colorado MILLER, JOHNSON & KUEHN, INC. 4.70% 2003 Minneapolis, Minnesota U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY 5.00% 2003 Minneapolis, Minnesota WELLS FARGO BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC Minneapolis, Minnesota DAIN RAUSCHER, INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota 'MBIA insurance purchased by Han'Ifen, Imhoff 5.00% 2003 $4,011,320.00 $505,346.67 4.8796% $3,968,080.00 $517,586.67 5.030 $3,993,400.00 $523,266.67 5.0664% $3,979,520.00 $537,146.67 5.2118% • FREERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 & ASSOCIATES Inc 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehlers - inc.com Offices in Roseville, MN, Brookfield, WI and Naperville, IL Final • • • of Hutchinson, MN $4,000,000 General Obligation Temporary Public Date Principal 12/1/00 100,000.00 6/1/01 216,666.67 12/1/01 100, 000.00 6/1/02 100,000.00 12/1/02 200,000.00 6/1/03 4,000,000 TOTAL 4,000,000 Dated Delivery Date Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) True Interest Cost (TIC) November 1, 2000 November 1, 2000 Rate Bonds, Series 2000 Annual Interest P &I 12/1 116, 666.67 116, 666.67 10,333.33 100,000.00 100,000.00 216,666.67 100,000.00 100, 000.00 4.89045% 100,000.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 5.000% 100,000.00 4,100,000.00 4,100,000.00 516,666.67 4,516,666.67 4,516,666.67 Final Projected 10,333.33 2.583 Years 5.00000% 4.80000% 4.89045% 5.10968% 4.87969% 5.13220% 505,346. Interest Cost Premium Total Interest Cost Projected Total Interest Cost Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/10/00 [temp.xls] 0 0 0 BOND INDEX Bond Buyer Index (20 Bond, 20 Years) Regiona/ Index (20 Bond, 10 Years) Revenue Bond Index (25 Bond, 30 Years) 610% - l II As of October 6, 2000 l March 1999 through October 2000 -i '' 509/0 Revenue Bond Index............ 5.85% - - - 0.30% - Bond Buyer Index ..... 5.64% 4, Regional Index. ... ... 4.71% - - - M . - .. .dµ be k RBI BBI i 5% .30 - t IriT' W 4,9G% 'mss r 4 51..', i � +`S� .e .�,l�l : "-�-z F�� '� 3 r 5• l 1 1 3 5 S l 2 ± 4 1 2 2 1 2] r] 12 i 1 5 1 Z 3�� l ti 5 5 1 p J 4 1 3 3 i 1 2 9�1 1 3 3 4 5 1 3 3 4 1 2 3 4 5�1 2 3 4 1 3 1 1 3 1 5 1 3 4 1_ A M J J • A 5 p Ir J G M 4 M J J 0 0 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 10/6/00 BBI -B &W Chart 1 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $4,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY PUBLIC UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000A Issuer: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 10, 2000, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers at the Hutchinson City Center. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting including (pages): 1 through 20 RESOLUTION NO. 11601 • RESOLUTION RELATING TO $4,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY PUBLIC UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000A; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR • I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this i oth day of October 1 2000. Gary D. Plotz City Administrator • • FREERS 6 ASSOCIATES INC Q To: 2 From: C W subject: G Date: Mayor and City Council, City of Hutchinson Jim Prosser Bid Results for $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B October 10, 2000 Ehlers & Associates is pleased to provide the following bid results for the $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B which were received on October 10, at 10:00 A. M. $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B Low Bidder True Interest Rate Number of Bids Range of Bids Rating Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (Chicago IL) 5.1564% 7 1564% to 5.2962% Moody's "AY MBIA Insured (purchased by underwriter) Moody's Investors Service Aaa Council Action Adopt "A Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Sale of $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B, and Providing For Their Issuance" Awards sale to low bid. Attachments ■ Bid Tabulation ■ Revised Debt Service Analysis • ■ Bond Index for October 10, 2000 LE IN PUBLI F I N A N C E 3060 Centre Pmte Drive Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 F - G - ( - 2 -) 651.697.8503 fax 651.697.8555 jim @ehlers- inc.com • BID TABULATION $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B City of Hutchinson, Minnesota SALE October 10, 2000 AWARD MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER RATING MBIA Insured (Moody's Investors Service "Aaa ")' BBI: 5.64% NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER Chicago, Illinois CRONIN & CO., INC. Minneapolis, Minnesota PAINEWEBBER, INC. Chicago, Illinois SALOMON SMITH BARNEY Chicago, Illinois CIBC WORLD MARKETS Ohi ew York, New York G MASON WOOD WALKER, INC. cago, Illinois KIRLIN SECURITIES, INC. Syosett, New York HANIFEN, IMHOFF DIVISION OF STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED Denver, Colorado 4.50% 4.55% 4.60% 4.65% 4.70% 4.75% 4.80% 5.00% 5.10% 5.20% 5.25% 4.45% 4.50% 4.55% 4.60% 4.65% 4.70% 4.80% 4.85% 4.90% 5.00% 5.10% 5.20% 5.25% 5.30% 2002 -2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -2009 2010 2011 -2013 2014 2015 2016 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 MMI-IMA MBIA Insurance purchased by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. r FREERS 8 ASSOCIATES INC $2,762,906.80 $1,333,773.20 $2,763,436.05 $1,343,054.58 5.1898% g- G - ( z) L E A D E R S I N P U B L I C F I N A N C E 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 551131105 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehiers- inc.com Offices in Roseville, MN, Brookfield, WI and Naperville, IL $2,800,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B City of Hutchinson, Minnesota P& NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE EBOND TRADE, LLC 4.50% 2002 -2003 $2,771,596.75 $1,355,435.75 5.2254% Walnut Creek ,California 4.60% 2004 4.65% 2005 4.70% 2006 4.75% 2007 4.80% 2008 4.85% 2009 4.90% 2010 5.00% 2011 5.10% 2012 5.20% 2013 5.25% 2014 5.375% 2015 5.40% 2016 U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY 5.00% 2002 -2014 $2,771,483.30 $1,355,119.20 5.2367% Minneapolis, Minnesota 5.30% 2015 WELLS FARGO BROKERAGE 5.40% 2016 SERVICES, LLC • Minneapolis, Minnesota MORGAN KEEGAN & CO., INC. Memphis, Tennessee STEPHENS INC. 4.875% 2002 -2004 $2,760,800.00 $1,363,109.69 5.2790% Nashville, Tennessee 4.90% 2005 -2009 5.00% 2010 -2011 5.05% 2012 5.15% 2013 5.20% 2014 5.25% 2015 -2016 DAIN RAUSCHER, INC. 4.40% 2002 $2,761,780.00 $1,369,980.63 5.2909% Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.45% 2003 4.55% 20D4 4.60% 2005 4.65% 2006 4.70% 2007 4.80% 2008 4.85% 2009 4.90% 2010 5.00% 2011 5.10% 2012 5.20% 2013 5.30% 2014 5.40% 2015 5.50% 2016 • 00,000 General Obligation Wastewater Treatment Revenue Bonds, Series 20008 of Hutchinson, Minnesota Page 3 NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE MILLER, JOHNSON & KUEHN, INC. 4.40% 2002 Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.50% 2003 4.60% 2004 4.65% 2005 4.70% 2006 4.75% 2007 4.80% 2008 4.85% 2009 4.90% 2010 5.00% 2011 5.10% 2012 5.20% 2013 5.30% 2014 5.40% 2015 5.45% 2016 $2,760,800.00 $1,370,581.87 5.2962% • r� U 'K - c� -ra) Final of Hutchinson, MN General Obligation Wastewater Bonds, Series 2000 Date Principal 2/1/01 265,812.50 2/1/02 95,000 2/1/03 135,000 2/1/04 145,000 2/1/05 150,000 2/1/06 160,000 211107 165,000 2/1/08 175,000 2/1/09 185,000 211110 195,000 211111 205,000 211112 215,000 2/1/13 225,000 2/1/14 235,000 2/1/15 250,000 2/1/16 265,000 TOTAL 2,800,000 Rate Interest P &I 4.500% 170,812.50 Delivery Date 265,812.50 First Coupon Date 4.500% 132,375.00 Final 267,375.00 $25,995.00 4.550% 126,300.00 Average Coupon 271,300.00 Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.600% 119,702.50 5.15644% 269,702.50 4.650% 112,802.50 272,802.50 4.700% 105,362.50 270,362.50 4.750% 97,607.50 272,607.50 4.750% 89,295.00 274,295.00 4.800% 80,507.50 275,507.50 5.000% 71,147.50 276,147.50 5.000% 60,897.50 275,897.50 5.000% 50,147.50 275,147.50 5.100% 38,897.50 273,897.50 5.200% 26,912.50 276,912.50 5.250% 13,912.50 278,912.50 1,296,680.00 4,096,680.00 Dated 11/01/2000 Delivery Date 11/01/2000 First Coupon Date 8/01/2001 Projected Total Int. Final Bond Year Dollars $25,995.00 Average Life 9.284 Years Average Coupon 4.98819% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 5.13088% True Interest Cost (TIC) 5.15644% Interest Cost 1,296,680.00 Discount Allow. 37,093.20 Total Interest Cost 1,333,773.20 Projected Total Int. 1,402,940.00 Difference $ 5.24616% 5.39696% 5.42959% L n LJ C , J Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10 /10 /00 [Sewer.xls] 0 0 0 BOND INDEX C 7 0% }- March 1999 through October 2000 As of October 6, 2000 r, 5015 Revenue Bond Index..... ..... 5.85% - - Bond Buyer Index ................ 5.64% Regional Index ............... 4.71% 5 70 I i RBI ' � BB , - t - �f 4 1011111 5 11)'�Ja m`�' •� s s'"�u � �'�'. _ ! 7k`��F,� '" - r11 J [ A ri r k y4 kC(' -. F4 REG if"�!' I 1•�a��{r� 1�. n't�} 4 50 V, .v e, t �ggf M , d :4.?. � 4�i,k d 4s r •1�y� ��flSti„'�5 r11Jy�w -�`i�� .w,� 1�y fi / k yA"r},r.,yy`'k..h'+�r ! '`?at f"'rf # 6 r d^' 9 b 1 3 3. 1 2 �! 4 1 2 3• b 1 2 J • b 12 5 4 1� 2 9 1 5 1 Y J 1 1 2 J. 12 3 4 1 2 3. 5 1:! 4 1 J i 5 1 L J 4 1 2 9 4 1 4 4 5 12�] 5 A M J J h 5 O IJ J C M A M J J 1 O I t Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 10/6100 BBI -B &W Chart 1 Bond Buyer Index (20 Bond, 20 Years) Regional Index (20. Bond, 10 Years) Revenue Bond Index (25 Bond, 30 Years) CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO • $2,800,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000B Issuer: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on October 10, 2000, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers at the Hutchinson City Center. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting including (pages): 1 through 20 RESOLUTION NO. 11602 • RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,800,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WASTEWATER TREATMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2000B; AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND SECURITY THEREFOR I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this 10th day of October 2000. • Gary D. Plotz City Administrator 6 C2-) • • FREERS b ASSOCIATES INC Q To: 2 From: W Subject: 2 Date: Mayor and City Council, City of Hutchinson Jim Prosser Bid Results for $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C October 10, 2000 Ehlers & Associates is pleased to provide the following bid results for the $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C which were received on October 10, at 10:00 A.M. $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C Low Bidder True Interest Rate Number of Bids Range of Bids Rating 4.9414% 0 4.9414% to 5.0665% Moody's "AY MBIA Insured (purchased by underwriter) Moody's Investors Service Aaa Council Action Adopt "A Resolution Accepting Proposal on the Sale of $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C, and Providing For Their Issuance" Awards sale to low bid. U Attachments ■ Bid Tabulation ■ Revised Debt Service Analysis ■ Bond Index for October 10, 2000 LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 Hanifen Imhoff, Division of Stifel Nicolaus & Company, Inc. (Denver CO) 651.697.8503 fax 651.697.8555 JimQehlers- inc.com S- C�5- (3) BID TABULATION $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C City of Hutchinson, Minnesota SALE: October 10, 2000 AWARD HANIFEN, IMHOFF DIVISION OF STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED RATING MBIA Insured (Moody's Investors Service "Aaa ")' BBI: 5.64% NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE HANIFEN, IMHOFF DIVISION OF STIFEL, 4.45% 2002 $2,403,557.15 $716,218.48 4.9414% NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 4.50% 2003 Denver, Colorado 4.55% 2004 4.60% 4.60% 2005 Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.65% 2006 4.70% 2007 2007 4.80% 2008 -2009 4.75% 4.85% 2010 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY 4.90% 2011 • 5.00% 2012 EBOND TRADE, LLC 4.50% Walnut Creek, California 4.55% 4.60% 4.65% 4.70% 4.75% 4.60% 4.875% 5.00% 2002 $2,404,473.45 $720,561.55 4.9702% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 -2009 2010 2011 -2012 MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER 4.50% 2002 -2003 $2,398,075.45 $721,195.80 4.9833% Chicago, Illinois 4.55% 2004 CRONIN & COMPANY, INC. 4.60% 2005 Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.65% 2006 PAINEWEBBER, INC. 4.70% 2007 Chicago, Illinois 4.75% 2008 -2009 SALOMON SMITH BARNEY 4.80% 2010 Chicago, Illinois 5.00% 2011 -2012 CIBC WORLD MARKETS New York, New York LEGG MASON WOOD WALKER, INC. Chicago, Illinois • v -G-63> 'MBIA insurance purchased by Hariffen, Imhoff E H L E R S L E A D E R S I N P U B L I C F I N A N C E 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, 55113 -1105 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.e hlers- inc.COm 6 ASSOCIATES I R C Offices in Roseville, MN, Brookfield, WI and Naperville, IL $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000C City of Hutchinson, Minnesota P`2 NET TRUE NAME OF BIDDER RATE YEAR PRICE INTEREST INTEREST COST RATE U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY 5.00% 2002 -2012 $2,421,691.40 $730,621.20 5.0229% Minneapolis, Minnesota WELLS FARGO BROKERAGE SERVICES, LLC Minneapolis, Minnesota DAIN RAUSCHER, INC. 4.625% Minneapolis, Minnesota 4.65% 4.70% 4.80% 4.85% 4.90% 5.00% 5.10% 2002 -2005 $2,395,171.45 $732,024.49 5.0621% 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 STEPHENS, INC. 4.60% 2002 -2003 $2,400,265.00 $733,659.37 5.0665% Nashville, Tennessee 4.65% 2004 4.70% 2005 . 4.75% 2006 4.80% 2007 4.85% 2008 -2009 5.00% 2010 5.05% 2011 -2012 0 City of Hutchinson, MN $2,425,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 2000 Data Principal 2/1/01 November 1, 2000 8/1/01 Final 2/1/02 255,000 8/1/02 5.998 Years 2/1 /03 210,000 8/1/03 4.92373% 211/04 215,000 8/1 /04 261,262.50 2/1/05 225,000 8/1 /05 46,537.50 2/1 /06 235,000 8/1 /06 4.550% 2/1/07 250,000 8/1107 93,364 2/1/08 270,000 8/1 /08 303,183.75 2/1/09 210,000 8/1/09 266,646.25 2/1/10 210,000 8/1/10 36,471.25 2/1/11 210,000 8/1/11 4.650% 2/1112 135,000 TOTAL 2,425,000 ^ 1 �, Dated November 1, 2000 Delivery Date November 1, 2000 89,675 Final Bond Year Dollars 14,546.25 Average Life 5.998 Years Average Coupon 4.77632% Net Interest Cost (NIC) 4.92373% True Interest Cost (TIC) 4.94146% Ehlers & Assaiates, Inc. Annual 105% Me Interest w 5/1 Annual 5.27166% 5.30432% 10/10/00 • Rate: 5.94% $1,658,131 85,404.38 85,404.38 85,40438 89,675 4,450% 56,936.25 311,936.25 1,541,900 51,262.50 51,262.50 363,198.75 381,359 4.500% 51,262.50 261,262.50 1,404,000 1,530,902 244,608 46,537.50 46,537.50 307,800.00 323,190 4.550% 46,537.50 261,537.50 224,909 93,364 1,251,000 41,646.25 41,646.25 303,183.75 318,343 4.600% 41,646.25 266,646.25 1,178,700 1,294,937 195,361 36,471.25 36,471.25 303,117.50 318,273 4.650% 36,471.25 271,471.25 175,662 68,077 756,100 31,007.50 31,007.50 302,478.75 317,603 4.700% 31,007.50 281,007.50 145,294 25,132.50 25,132.50 306,140.00 321,447 4.800% 25,132.50 295,132.50 18,652.50 18,652.50 313,785.00 329,474 4.800% 18,652.50 228,652.50 13,612.50 13,612.50 242,265.00 254,378 4.850% 13,612.50 223,612.50 8,520.00 8,520.00 232,132.50 243,739 4.900% 8,520.00 218,520.00 3,375.00 3,375.00 221,895.00 232,990 5.000% 3,375.00 138,375.00 138,375.00 145,294 694,775.63 3,119,775.63 3,119,775.63 Interest Cost 694,775.63 Discount Allowance 21 442.85 PrQkcted Total Interest Cost 716,218.48 Projected Total Interest Cost 766 829.88 5.06328% Difference $ 50,611.40 5.27166% 5.30432% 10/10/00 • Rate: 5.94% $1,658,131 Projected New Existing Projected Spec. Assess, Debt L evy Debt Lew Total Debt 1,541,900 264,306 - 1,566,200 1,566,200 254,457 126,902 1,404,000 1,530,902 244,608 78,582 1,352,700 1,431,282 234,758 83,585 1,299,800 1,383,385 224,909 93,364 1,251,000 1,344,364 215,060 102,543 1,211,700 1,314,243 205,210 116,237 1,178,700 1,294,937 195,361 134,113 805,000 939,113 185,512 68,867 765,900 834,767 175,662 68,077 756,100 824,177 174,632 58,358 748,600 806,958 145,294 145,294 llmprovement.xls) BOND INDEX Bond Buyer Index (20 Bond, 20 Years) Regional Index (20 Bond, 10 Years) Revenue Bond Index (25 Bond, 30 Years) March 199; ZZah October 2000 As of October 6, 2000 Revenue Bond Index ............. 5.85% Bond Buyer Index ................. 5.64% Regional Index ..................... 4.71% I I f REG LILA 3 A 4 b 1 2 3 ♦ 1 2 ♦ 3 1 5 1 2 i 1 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 23 4 1! 3 1 1 1 1 4 IA A Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 1016/00 BBI-B&W Chart 1 it "e 131311 RBI 4 90% 4 70% REG LILA 3 A 4 b 1 2 3 ♦ 1 2 ♦ 3 1 5 1 2 i 1 1 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 23 4 1! 3 1 1 1 1 4 IA A Prepared by Ehlers and Associates 1016/00 BBI-B&W Chart 1 • CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $2,425,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2000C Issuer: City of Hutchinson, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on October 10, 2000, at 5:30 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers at the Hutchinson City Center. Councilmembers present: Councilmembers absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 23 RESOLUTION NO. 11603 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $2,425,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION • IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 2000C; AUTHORI7ING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR AND LEVYING AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this loth day of October , 2000. Gary D. Plotz (SEAL) City Administrator F_G43) • ft SRF No. 0983142 September 26, 2000 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 • • CITY OF HUTCHINSON I I 1 Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 PROJECT: South Grade Road City Project No. 00 -20 Letting Ho. 7 CONTRACTOR: Duininck Bros., Inc. 408 Sixth Street P.O. Box 208 Prinsburg, MN 56281 WHEREAS: The City of Hutchinson wishes to have Duininck Bros. install street lighting including wiring on South Grade Road. THEREFORE: In accordance with the terms of the Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the improvements as follows: 9 --A (1) South Grade Road Change Order No. 1 Letting No. 7 /Project No. 00 -20 -2- "INCREASE" Item No. Item Description Unit 2545.501 Electric Light System LS NET INCREASE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT CONTRACT SUMMARY Original Contract Amount Change Order No. l Revised Contract Amount Unit Price $18,500 September 26, 2000 Esumated Q uanti ty I Amount $18,500.00 $18500.00 $742,540.32 $ 18,500.00 $761,040.32 • • ISSUED: �Qa4-4;0A. '� SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ACCEPTED BY: 6uininck Bros., Inc APPROVED BY: City of Hutchinson f,Z6 fZ00a Date / cn -� -0 0 Date Date • 08/08/ ;000 08:08 FAZ 0 • ,tll 9000L DUININCK BROSC F�QVINQ 'THE WAY FOF t AMERICA City of Hutchinson Quentin Larson Fax 320 - 234 -4140 �PA9e- 5 RE: South Grade Road Street Lights Dear Quentin: la 00 r Our price for the work, detailed on the attached sheet, is $ 18,500. Note that retainage can not apply to this extra work. It will have to be paid, in full, within thirty days of completion. Sincerely, Tom Monson DUININCK BR08„ INC., 406 8TH STREET, P.O. BOX 200, PRINSOW10, MINNESOTA 68281.0208 TELEPHONE (320)670-0011 m.s...►o�a.l.lpe�r� CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 CITY OF HUTCHINSON - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 111 HASSAN ST SE, HUTCHINSON MN 55350 (612) 234 -4209 Sheet 1 of 1 CONTRACTOR: Dulninck Bros Inc Letting No. 7 Project No. 00 -20 408 6th St, P O Box 208, Prinsburg MN 56281 -0208 Project Location: South Grade Road SW DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Street Lights Dated: 0812712000 Item No. Spec. Ref. Item Name Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount INCREASE ITEMS: Division IV-Street Construction and Restoration 1 Install 12 Hutchinson Utilities fumised poles, luminairs, lamps, fusing, splice blocks, etc, along north and south side of South Grade Road as per attached quote from Duininck Bros Inc. Lump Sum 1 $18,500.00 $18,500.00 TOTAL INCREASE ITEMS $18,600.00 TOTAL INCREASE $18,500.00 NET DECREASE $18,500.00 In accordance with the Contract and Specifications, the contract amount shall be adjusted In the amount of $ 14,000.00 (add)1(deduct). An extension of -0- days shall be allowed for completion. The original completion date shall not be changed. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT PREVIOUS ADDITIONSMEDUCTIONS THIS ADDITIONIOSOUC4IOM TOTAL $742,540.32 $0.00 $18 600.00 $761,040.32 PROVED' C tractor DATED: �� j — � APPROVED: Mayor DATED: PPROVED: Director of Engineering DATED: APPROVED: City Administrator DATED: 09/0812000 08:09 FAX FROM Gaade Electric 9000L P1KI NO. : 320 5137 5574 Quade's Inc. Electrical Conbuctors 35 - 4th Ave NE Hutchinson MN 55350 Office: 320 -587 -3030 Fax: 320 -587 -5574 Q002 Sap. 01 2000 02:29PH P1 FAX TRANSMITTAL. COVER SHEET DATE: August 30, 2000 TO: Tom Mtanson @ Duh ick Brothers I= FAR: FROM: Mark ® Quade's NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 1 Subject+ South Grade Road Ligbtiog complete eloobj9al ioatallaBon as per your bond sheet speoffiosbOns6 my job wear thru wtrh Quentin Lsnoa (City of Hutchinson), Don Nelson (Hut LW iw), andthe IbBowins soope ofwork: 1) Ina" Qty. 12 Hutchinson Utilities fimdsbed poles; hmlioains, lamps„ fiaing, SPEW blocks: etc. along north and south aide of South Grade Road, as per their drawhtg. 2) Quade's to provide the neoessery boring contractors to get ands do W&vda s and driveways. 3) Quade'a to roll back the sod, WOA the oondmtws, light poles6 repLca and tamp the dht and non out the sod. Watering of the god by othe rL Quentin Larson to sign off that the sod is soc eptabie when we leave an area 4) As per Don Nclaoa of1ba dmuou LTtlHtles, the wire size is 06 dupkK between tights ad #2 — 2 — 4 for a honrraa cuouit, from the nortbeeat comer of vmeywd United Mamodist Chm-ch to South Grade Road following the utility eels 5) No retsinage to be withheld $om this project 6) Completion datewill be the and of September. If the boring contractor can get in sooner, the completion date Will move up. 000 in �, 0 SRF No. 0983142 September 26, 2000 CHANGE ORDER NO.5 • E CITY OF HUTCHINSON 111 Hassan Street Southeast Hutchinson, MN 55350 PROJECT: Century Avenue/Dale Street City Project Nos. 99 -03 and 99 -04 Letting No. 4 CONTRACTOR: Duininck Bros., Inc. 408 Sixth Street P.O. Box 208 Prinsburg,NIN 56281 WHEREAS: The City of Hutchinson wishes to have Duininck Bros. perform additional grading work in the boulevards on Dale Street, THEREFORE: In accordance with the terms of the Contract, you are hereby authorized and instructed to perform the improvements as follows: V 4 - (2) Dale Street Change Order No. 5 -2- Letting No. 4 /Project No. 99 -03 6 99 -04 "INCREASE" Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Price 2105.603 Embankment Special m3 $4.60 NET INCREASE IN CONTRACT AMOUNT CONTRACT SUMMARY Original Contract Amount Previous Change Orders Change Order No. 5 Revised Contract Amount ISSUED: BOA. r.-O SRF Consulting Group, Inc. ACCEPTED BY: September 26, 2000 0 Estimated Q uanti ty Amount 757 $ 3,482.20 $ 3,482.20 $1,256,984.85 $ 13,051.67 $ 3,482.20 $1,273,518.72 • 912612000 Date m -3 -0e) Date APPROVED BY: City of Hutchinson Date 0 i CITY OF HUTCHINSON RESOLUTION NO. 1160 RESOLUTION SETTING INTEREST RATE FOR 2000 ADOPTED ASSESSMENT ROLLS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA: THAT all assessment rolls, which have been adopted and will be adopted relating to 2000 improvement bonds, are hereby changed to read an interest rate of 5.9 This rate is the true interest rate of the 2000 Improvement bonds plus 1%. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of October 2000 6 A Marlin Torgerson Mayor ATTEST: Gary D. Plotz City Administrator L W October 5, 2000 To: Honorable Mayor & City Council From: John Olson, Asst. Public Works Dir. Floyd Groehler, Cemetery Supervisor FOR r01I /NFO Ru w Subject: Potential for an Addition to the Oakland Chapel Dobratz -Hantge Funeral Chapels, has expressed an interest in budding a significant addition to the existing Oakland Chapel. They are still in the planning stage and no decision has yet been made by them The construction they propose would be done at no cost to the City. The building would be designed to hold more than twice the capacity currently available in the chapel. The design to be used would be dignified and beautiful, and would be a tribute to the community, as well as to the donors. The building would be available for cemetery- related use by the public. Similar situations with buildings on City property have come up recently, the first is the Oakland Chapel in its current configuration, the second is the Civil Air Patrol building at the airport. In both cases, entities not associated with the City have put together facilities far beyond our department's ability in exchange for a long -term agreement for their use. As more details become available, a draft agreement will be written. The agreement will outline the responsibilities of each of the parties, including the assurance that no construction costs will be bome by the City. Many other issues will also be addressed by this agreement as well. The agreement will likely be based on the current Oakland Cemetery Agreement This memo is to introduce you to this issue and no action by you at this time is requested. • RECEIVED 0 0 South Skyview Estates 15 Orchard Ave SE Hutchinson, Mn 55350 City of Hutchinson I I I Hassen St SE Hutchinson, Mn 55350 Re: Vehicle Traffic on Bradford St SE and Orchard Ave SE OCT 4 - 2000 City of HutchirksM FOR YOUR !NF_4RMklio �, Since the Prairie Senior Cottages, the home for people with memory loss, has opened there is much more vehicle traffic on these streets. And we believe that some of them are speeding, going both ways. The worst offenders are traveling on Bradford St from Century Ave to Orchard Ave and into the parking lot of Prairie Cottages. It is both the workers from the home, and people visiting the home. It is traveled like a highway. We are wondering if something can be done about this, before someone gets hurt? ?? Prairie Cottages, can you please have a talk with your employee's? Could the Police Deptartment patrol more often, and maybe catch some of the offenders? After all it is a city residential street, and there must be speed limits for these streets. Also is it possible to have signs showing the speed limit posted ? Thanks for hearing our concern. from South Skyview Estates Association President, Warren Schwarz Secretary Arlene Schwarz cc: Hutchinson Police Dept South Skyview Estates File Prairie Senior Cottages L� • Hutchinson Fire Department 205 Third Avenue SE Hutchinson MN 55350 320 - 234 -4211 Monthly Council Update September 2000 The Fire Department responded to 30 calls for service in the month of September: Breakdown of the calls- City Residential 2 Commercial / Industrial 3 Multi - Family 2 School Type 5 Rescue 1 Hazardous Material 3 Grass Type 1 Good Will 1 Mutual Aid 1 Rural Rescue 1 Medical 2 Vehicle 1 Grass Type 6 Carbon Monoxide 1 Drills / Meetings SCBA maintenance for the month Small tool use drill Airport tour and pre -plan Held several truck committee meetings Scheduled 31 fire prevention classes in schools, early childhood centers and elderly housing centers for September / October. We will teach over 1000 people about fire safety Held an open house for the public Completed our annual fund- raiser, it was our most successful ever! Our fire department has been chosen to put on a seminar at the Fire Chiefs Conference this year in Rochester. The seminar will be on how we have reorganized our fire • department in Hutchinson. • • HUTCHINSON PIONEERLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT AUGUST 31, 2000 REVENUE: M -T -D Y -T -D - 98,050.00 % OF % OF HEALTH INSURANCE AMOUNT AMOUNT BUDGET BUDGET YEAR RESERVE 0.00 87,556.00 87,556.00 100.00% 67% CITY OPERATING 0.00 65,247.00 88,998.00 75.00% 67% COUNTY OPERATING 0.00 23,876.00 47,35200 50.00% 67% GIFTS 0.00 1,222.53 1,000.00 0.00% 87% CHARGES, FINES 0.00 10.90 10.00 109.00% 67% COPY MACHINE 191.40 1,218.40 1,500.00 0.00% 67% EQUIPMENT RENTALS 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00% 67% BOOK SALES 0.00 1,800.00 3,000.00 80.00% 87% OTHER 8.00 234.20 250.00 93.88% 67% TOTAL REVENUES 199.40 180,974.03 227,866.00 79.49% 67% EXPENDITURES: SALARIES - 7,855.98 - 63,281.84 - 98,050.00 84.52% 67% HEALTH INSURANCE -2.00 -16.00 52.00 30.77% 87% HEALTH INSURANCE- DEDUCTIBLE 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00% 67% PAYROLL TAXES - 881.57 - 7,077.01 - 11,200.00 83.19% 87% BOOKS - 1,934.98 - 14,284.39 - 27,340.00 52.25% 67% PERIODICALS 55.00 - 3,214.96 - 4,180.00 77.28% 67% VIDEOS _ 0.00 0.00 -417.00 0.00% 67% BINDINGS 0.00 0.00 - 100.00 0.00% 87% POSTAGE & SHIPPING -53.00 - 172.00 -O00.00 28.67% 67% NEW EQUIPMENT 0.00 5,353.00 - 10,000.00 0.00% 67% MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS 0.00 589.75 - 1,200.00 49.15% 67% SUPPLIES -98.84 - 1,278.49 - 2,245.00 56.86% 67% PROMOTIONAL & PROGRAMS -29.93 - 220.77 - 1,145.00 19.28% 87% INSURANCE 0.00 - 938.17 - 940.00 99.81% 87% ADS & LEGAL NOTICES 0.00 0.00 - 108.00 0.00% 67% AUDITING 0.00 -84.38 -81.00 104.17% 67% BOOKKEEPING -39.92 - 355.73 - 416.00 85.51% 67% CONTINUING EDUCATION 0.00 0.00 - 411.00 0.00% 87% SALES TAX 0.00 -0.31 - 218.00 0.14% 67% TOTAL EXPENDITURES - 10,931.22 -98,844.60 158,681.00 61.03% 67% FUNDS AVAILABLE - 10,731.82 84,129.43 88,985.00 - 121.95% 87% • 0 CITY OF NUTCNINBON LIQUOR STORE COISP MON SEPTEKBER 1999 OS2:I: 1 2,237 2 2,568 3 3,661 6 S,271 1 1,882 0 2,249 9 2,171 10 1,278 11 3,132 13 1,699 16 1,647 15 1,733 16 2,297 17 4,540 16 3,610 20 1,111 21 1,801 22 2,111 23 1,931 26 3,993 25 6,158 27 1,508 28 1,473 29 1,590 30 2,358 7173000911 3,720 592 5,909 826 11,122 1,869 11,512 1,125 3,067 656 2,552 166 3,632 972 7,699 1,156 7,932 1,508 3,769 632 2,521 536 2,986 595 1,157 1,020 7,713 1,115 6,090 1,892 2,700 692 2,816 856 3,216 613 6,092 731 0,019 1,731 8,650 1,372 2,853 787 2,362 639 2,036 665 1,176 653 TOTAL 61,127 98 TOTAL 66,626 %OF SALE 29 SALES INC OR DEC 128,028 21,657 121,210 20,677 56 11 11,961 IQSC. TOTAL 218 6,767 609 9,690 630 19,062 696 19,231 265 5,650 207 5,171 370 7,165 560 13,793 671 13,516 218 6,518 217 4,924 265 5,659 331 7,008 693 13,899 665 16,295 176 6,701 166 5,669 230 6,100 221 - 6,970 669 16,192 621 11,801 209 5,637 156 1,630 239 5,308 213 7,398 0,979 10,631 6 5 6 TOTAL BY WEEK 56,753 15,808 53,133 52,826 22,573 229,091 217,150 100 CITY OF HUMXM30N LIQUOR STORE CMO?ARISON SEPT 2000 1 2 / 5 6 7 6 9 11 12 13 16 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 LIQUOR 5,927 5,208 11,129 12,710 HOLIDAY 2,662 2,186 2,313 1,127 6,516 1,861 1,744 2,181 2,137 5,185 6,221 1,883 1,740 1,932 2,111 1,021 3,607 1,519 1,710 1,922 2,250 6,171 1,280 TOTAL. 77,176 99 TOTAL 67,427 %OF SALE 29 SALES INC OR DEC 3,709 3,026 6,161 9,000 10,118 3,065 2,658 3,532 6,089 10,106 9,229 3,697 2,612 3,003 1,615 9,361 1,253 3,976 2,786 3,316 6,580 9,168 9,019 WINE MISC. U 1,561 669 19,269 1,626 692 20,636 0 711 190 7,695 692 266 6,268 1,612 221 8,090 1,266 119 16,512 1,616 911 17,666 396 207 5,567 388 176 6,966 976 316 7,206 961 169 7,356 1,657 672 17,622 1,722 591 15,766 666 199 6,663 662 157 6,971 715 119 5,879 1,063 296 6,198 1,613 696 16,291 2,051 671 13,660 1,066 256 6,795 165 167 6,826 857 265 6,360 1,050 215 8,198 1,368 681 15,391 11561 617 15,507 150,133 27,681 128,028 26,651 57 10 35,131 9,123 8,979 3 15 6 TOTAL BY LEER 39,70S 53,809 58,679 55,250 57,079 266,522 229,091 100 Monday OCTOBER 9, 2000 aml - a B SECTION Garbage haulers keep eye on Shakopee As Waste Management continues to buy up smaller companies, a city looks for ways to improve residential service after complaints. By Mlle Kaszuba Star Tribune Staff Writer By midsummer, Waste Man- agement had wom out its wel- come in Shakopee. After complaints about messy and spotty garbage pickup and dis- organized billing, city officials decided not to renew the contract that had given Waste Management, the nation's largest garbage com- pany, the exclusive right to haul Shakopee's garbage for a decade. "In light of the problems that we had, it would have really been unfair to our residents to just re- new the contract," Mayor Jon Brekke said. The city turned down Waste Management's last- minute request that the company be given a chance to redeem itself under the existing contract and decided to put the contract out for bid. But the story is hardly over. Next month, the city is expected to vote on a new hauling contract, and Waste Management is among those competing for it. The garbage - hauling industry is watching Shakopee closely to see whether a small hauler can com- pete for a large contract, or whether Waste Management's vig- orous attempt to win back the contract will prevail. Some small haulers, such as Skyline Waste Systems, also see Shakopee's five - year contract as a steppingstone from which they might win more business in the Twin Cities' south- ern suburbs, where Waste Man- agement is a big player. Waste Management's problems in Shakopee are familiar to cus- tomers, haulers and industry observers who complain that Waste Management has gotten too big and is more interested in pleasing Wall Street than Main Street. Andy Schweizer, who sold three small Twin Cities -area haulers to Waste Management last year, said Waste Management's philosophy was to "tolerate cus- tomers and employees to obtain a greater stock price." GARRM cad an BL — Shakopee uses "closed "system. GARBAGE from Bi After problems, Shakopee may break with Waste Management Since 1995, the company has bought at least 24 midsized inde- pendent haulers in the Twin Cities area and is increasingly domi- nating the local market. There also is debate over Sha- kopee's decision to remain one of the few area cities that operates a so -called closed system, meaning that the city's estimated 6,000 households must have their gar- bage hauled by the companyhold- ing the city contract Many cities operate so- called open systems, letting residents chose whichever hauler they want But Shakopee officials said they remain committed to a closed sys- tem because residents can turn to City Hall when they have com- plaints and the city, because of the contract, can force changes. Garbage in disarray Shakopee officials said the de- cision to seek other bidders was inevitable. Things are in such dis- array in Shakopee that Waste Management and the city are at odds over basic issues. Neither, for instance, seems certain of how much garbage is collected or how many people have 30- gallon garbage cans, as opposed to 60- gallon or 90 -gallon cans. In a letter to the city only last month, a Waste Management of- ficial said the city needs to tell the companies bidding exactly how many tons of garbage are involved. The city's reply. Waste Management, which has hauled the garbage for years, should al- ready know that information. The company, according to city offi- cials, has in the past given the city only "estimates." In preparation for the expected Nov. 6 contract award, six compa- nies sent representatives to a meeting two weeks ago at City Hall. They ranged from Waste Management and BFI, another large national company, to Dick's Sanitation in Lakeville. With 46 trucks, Dick's Sanitation has roughly one garbage truck for every five of Waste Management's in the Twin Cities area. "It's an excellent opportunity," said David Domack, a manager at Dick's Sanitation. "The concern I have ... is Waste Management is going to come back with a lower rate... and [the city will simply] negotiate." Some small haulers have com- plained that because Waste Man- agement also owns many nearby landfills and transfer stations where local haulers must pay to take garbage, other companies can't compete with Waste Man- agement's pricing. Waste Management officials say they're confident. "We've been assured by the city all the issues they've had with us have been resolved," said Andy Carr, a com- pany regional sales manager. "It's not unusual for a city to say, 'Hey.. . we want to test the waters.' " Appearing before Shakopee's City Council in August, one Waste Management official cautioned the city not to be too enamored of the smaller haulers. Mike Trulson told the City Council that he used to own Quality Waste Control before selling to Waste Manage- ment, where he now works. "I'm one of the guilty parties that sold out to the big conglom- erates," said Trulson, who said he owned Quality Waste for 30 yyears. He said small haulers often do not have the equipment or expertise to meet the garbage, recycling and special pickup demands of today's customers, whom he said "want perfection." "The small family [business] cannot operate in that envelope anymore," he said. And, contrary to popular belief, there is not "any difference" in the customer service provided by the small and large haulers, he said. Fewer choices Brekke, the mayor, isn't sure. "I am concerned about the in- creasing number of consolida- tions," he said. "In the long run, that's not good for the choices for the city." City officials also said a survey of residents found Waste Man- agement's customer service lack- ing. Forty-three percent of those surveyed said they were dissatis- fied with the neatness of the gar- bage collection, and only 54 per- cent were satisfied with the cour- tesy of the driver. Of those who contacted the company this year with a com- plaint, only 25 percent were satis- fied with the outcome, according to the survey. While 79 percent of those sur- veyed were satisfied with the ser- vice, city officials said, the figure was below the 90 percent satis- faction rating that is the industry standard for effective service. Some residents, according to city officials, are still smarting from problems that ensued when Waste Management took over the billing for garbage service from a utility company that serves the city. In a few cases, according to Tracy Coenen, a city management assistant, residents went for months without getting anybill for garbage hauling and then sud- denly were sent bills for $500 to $600. But even some who support seeking a new garbage contract say the problems — and the sur- vey results — need to be put into context. "Surveys, typically by their nature, produce the answers that you're looking for," said Bob Sweeney, a City Council member. Of garbage collection in gener- al, Sweeney said: "It's an insur- mountable problem to try to get it to anything where everybody's happy." So what happens if Waste Man- agement, despite the problems and survey results, wins the new contract? City officials insist they feel no pressure to choose a com- pany other than Waste Man- agement Mark McNeill, Shakopee's city administrator, said the city has not promised "to guarantee a change" away from Waste Management. "Waste Management may get it, it may be one of the [others]," he said. Mike Kaszaba can be contacted at mkaszuba@startribune.com , Smithsonian le Me,